Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005 02 02AGENDA BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 2, 2005 REGULAR MEETING CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER 7:00 P.M. Marlen Garcia David J. Olivas Bill Van Cleave PUBLIC COMMENTS The public is encouraged to address the City Council or any of its Agencies listed on this agenda on any matter posted on the agenda or on any other matter within its jurisdiction. If you wish to address the City Council or any of its Agencies, you may do so during the PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS period noted on the agenda. Each person is allowed five (5) minutes speaking time. A Spanish speaking interpreter is available for your convenience. Mayor - Mayor Pro Tern - Councilmember •: •- Councilmember I • A COMENTARIOS DEL PUBLIC Se invita al pOblico a dirigirse al Concitio o cualquiera otra de sus Agencias nombradas en esta agenda, Para hablar sobre cualquier asunto publicado en la agenda o cualquier tema que est6 bajo su jurisdicci6n. Si usted desea la oportunidad de difigirse al Concilio o a1guna de sus Agencias, podra hacerlo durante e/ periodo de Comentarios del POblico (Public Communications) anunciado en la agenda. A cada persona se /e permite hablar por cinco (5) minutos. Hay un int6rprete Para su conveniencia. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING — 7:00 P.M. Wv• •,1 Diell:telff-Al ROLL CALL Councilmembers: Marlen Garcia, David J. Olivas, Bill Van Cleave, Mayor Pro Tern Ricardo Pacheco and Mayor Manuel Lozano 1:2 &N Wa 171 • Introduction of Newly appointed Deputy City Clerk Laura Nieto • Presentation of Certificates of Appreciation presented to sponsors of the City's Annual Employee Recognition Awards Ceremony Five (5) minute speaking time limit Cinco (5) minutos sera el limite para hablar THIS IS THE TIME SET ASIDE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL PLEASE NOTIFY THE CITY CLERK IF YOU REQUIRE THE SERVICES OF AN INTERPRETER No action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances exist. The legislative body or its staff may: 1) Briefly respond to statements made or questions asked by persons; or 2) Direct staff to investigate and /or schedule matters for consideration at a future meeting. (Government Code §54954.2] ESTE ES EL PERIODO DESIGNADO PARA DIRIGIRSE AL CONCILIO FAVOR DE NOTIFICAR A LA SECRETARIA S1 REQUIERE LOS SERVICIOS DEL INTERPRETE No se podra tomar acci6n en algOn asunto a menos que sea incluido en la agenda, o a menos que exista algclna emergencia o circunstancia especial. El cuerpo legislativo, y su personal podran: 1) Responder brevemente a declaraci6nes o preguntas hechas por personas; o 2) Difigir personal a investigar y10 fijar asuntos para tomar en consideraci6n en juntas proximas. [Codigo de Gobiemo §54954.2] City Council Agenda Page 2 CONSENT CALENDAR All items listed are considered to be routine business by the City Council and will be approved with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a City Councilmember so requests, in which case, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. 1. CLAIM REJECTIONS Staff recommends City Council reject the claims of Mauricio Arzate (7.05.04); and Carrie Roper (01.10.05) and direct staff to send the appropriate notice of rejection to claimants. 2. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 1258 Staff recommends City Council adopt Ordinance No. 1258 on second reading entitled, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING SECTION 33.05 OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE TO PLACE THE POSITION OF ASSISTANT CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER IN THE UNCLASSIFIED SERVICE." 3. AWARD OF • -ACT — CONVERSION OF - ON POLICE PATROL VEHICLES Staff recommends City Council award the contract for the conversion on police patrol vehicles to Pursuit Technology, Inc., in the amount of $4,306.60 and authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement and authorize the Director of Public Works to execute any necessary change orders in an amount not to exceed ten percent (10 %) of the original contract amount. 4. APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE LETTER OF AGREEMENT WITH METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY FOR THE PURCHASE OF TRANSIT VEHICLES Staff recommends City Council approve Amendment No. 1 to the Letter of Agreement with the Metropolitan Transportation Authority dated February 1, 2005. 5. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF MAINE AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS, CIP 632 Staff recommends City Council 1) Award a contract in the amount of $1,219,939.25 to Gentry Brothers, Inc., for the construction of Maine Avenue Improvements; 2) Authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement; 3) Authorize an additional $35,000 for the inspection and construction management of this project; 4) Authorize staff to carry over Gas Tax funds in the amount of $235,000 and Prop "C funds in the amount of $500,000 from F Y 2 003 -04 t o F Y 2 004 -05; a nd 5) A uthorize t he F inance D irector t o make the necessary budget amendments and appropriations in the amount of $419,379 (Gas Tax Funds of $69,379 and Prop C funds of $350,000) to the Capital Improvement Project No. 632 (Maine Avenue Improvements) for FY 2004 -05; and 6) Authorize the Director of Public Works to execute any necessary change orders in an amount not to exceed ten percent (10 %) of the original contract amount. 6. WARRANTS & DEMANDS Staff recommends City Council receive and file the report. 7. PROPOSED RECOGNITIONS BY THE MAY•- r CITY COUNCIL FOR THE PERIOD FEBRUARY 2, 2005 TO FEBRUARY 15, 2005 Staff recommends City Council approve the preparation and presentation of the proposed certificates, proclamations and plaques. City Council Agenda Page 3 8. INDEPENDENT CITIES LEASE FINANCE AUTHORITY — HOMEBUYER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM Staff recommends City Council receive and file the report. 9. TERMINATION OF EXISTING HELICOPTER AGREEMENT AND APPROVAL OF A NEW AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF EL MONTE FOR HELICOPTER SERVICES (Continued from January 19, 2005) Staff recommends City Council terminate the existing Agreement and approve the new Agreement between the City of Baldwin Park and the City of El Monte for helicopter services and authorize execution of the Agreement. 10. MEGAN'S LAW UPDATE Staff recommends City Council receive and file the report. SET MATTERS — PUBLIC HEARINGS (7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard). If in the future you wish to challenge the following in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk and /or City Council at or prior to the public hearing. 11. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO FISCAL YEAR 2004 -05 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN (Continued from January 19, 2005) Following public hearing, staff recommends City Council reallocate CDBG and HOME funding, and approve the draft Amendment to the FY 2004 -05 Annual Action Plan. HEARING 12. PUBLIC APPROVAL OF DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AN -. COUNCIL 108), APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE (Z-542); APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT PLAN (DR-28), AND APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TM-62166); LOCATION: 4958 MAINE AVENUE; APPLICANT: PEDRO AND MARTHA MALTOS (Continued from January 19, 2005) Staff recommends City Council conduct the public hearing and following the public hearing, 1) Approve the Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact; and 2) Adopt Resolution 2005-011 amending the City's General Plan Land Use Element, redesignating a portion of the subject property from Single-Family Residential to Garden Multi-Family Residential; and 3) Waive further reading, read by title only and introduce for first reading Ordinance No. 1253 entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ♦ PARK APPROVING . ZONE DEVELOPMENT R-1, S INGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO RG (PD), RESIDENTIAL GARDEN M ULTI- O. PROPERTY 4958 MAINE AVENUE; APPLICANT: PEDRO AND MARTHA MALTOS; CASE NO.: 0: and and 4) Waive further reading, read by only • adopt Resolution No. 2004�092 entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF A FOUR (4) UNIT SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED PLANNED DEVELOPMENTAND COMMON LOT AND A TENATIVE TRACT MAP TO SUBDIVIDE • (2) LOTS INTO FIVE (5) LOTS FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES; APPLICANT: PEDRO AND MARTHA MALTOS; CASE NO.: DR-28 AND TM-62166; LOCATION: 4958 !• City Council Agenda 13. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT, A ZONE CHANGE (Z- 541), A DEVELOPMENT PLAN (DR-27), AND A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TM- 61281) — LOCATION: 3773-3779 BRESEE STREET; APPLICANT: BOWDEN DEVELOPMENT; CASE NO.: Z-541, DR-27 & TM 61281) (Continued from January 19, 2005) Staff recommends City Council following public hearing, 1) Adopt the Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact; and 2) Waive further reading, read by title only and introduce for first reading Ordinance No. 1251 entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK APPROVING A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM RG, RESIDENTIAL GARDEN TO RG (PD) RESIDENTIAL GARDEN PLANNED DEVELOPMENT; (APPLICANT: BOWDEN DEVELOPMENT; CASE NUMBER: Z-541; LOCATION 3773-3779 BRESEE STREET);" and 3) Waive further reading, read by title only and adopt Resolution N o. 2 004-089 entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN ALLOWING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NINE (9) UNIT SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED PLANNED D EVELOPMENT A ND C OMMON L OT, A ND A TENTATIVE TRACT M AP TO SUBDIVIDE TWO (2) LOTS INTO TEN (10) LOTS FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES; (APPLICANT: BOWDEN DEVELOPMENT; CASE NOS.: DR-27 AND TM- 61281; LOCATION 3773-3779 BRESEE STREET)." 14. PIIBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN (AGP-109), A ZONE CHANGE (Z-544), A DEVELOPMENT PLAN ZONE VARIANCE (ZV-696) AND A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TM-61346); LOCATION: 819 FRAZIER STREET; APPLICANT: D.C. CORPORATION (To be discussed concurrently with Community Developmeni Commission Item No. 4) (Continued from January 19, 2005) Staff recommends that following the public hearing, the City Council waive further reading, read by title only and adopt Resolution No. 2005-006 entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DENYING REQUESTS FOR: 1) AN AMENDMENT • THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT TO RE-DESIGNATE PROPERTY FROM SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL; 2) A ZONE CHANGE FROM 01, OFFICE INDUSTRIAL TO R-3 (PD), MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT; 3) A DEVELOPMENT PLAN ALLOWING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TWELVE (12) UNIT SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND COMMON LOT; 4) A ZONE VARIANCE TO ALLOW LESS THAN THE MINIMUM REQUIRED PARKING SPACES FOR A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND 5) A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO SUBDIVIDE TWO LOTS INTO SIX LOTS FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES; APPLICANT: D.C. CORPORATION; CASE NOS.: AGP-109, Z-544, ZV-696, DR-29 AND TM-61346; LOCATION: 819 FRAZIER STREET." Staff recommends that following the public hearing, the City Council waive further reading, read by title only and adopt Resolution No. 2005 -007 entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DENYING REQUESTS FOR: 1) AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT TO REDESIGNATE PROPERTY FROM SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO MULTI - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL; 2) A ZONE CHANGE FROM R -1, SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO R -3, MULTI- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL; 3) A SPECIFIC PLAN WITH INCLUDED DEVELOPMENT PLAN ALLOWING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NINETEEN (19) UNIT SINGLE - FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND 4) A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO SUBDIVIDE FIVE (5) LOTS INTO NINETEEN (19) LOTS FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES; APPLICANT: D.C. CORPORATION; CASE N OS.: AGP110, Z -545, S P 04 -01, D R -30, AND TM- 61345; LOCATION: 3940- 3948 WALNUT STREET." 16. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION APPROVING FEES FOR POLICE RELATED SERVICES (Continued from January 19, 2005) Staff recommends City Council waive further reading, read by title only and adopt Resolution No. 2005 -001 entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK APPROVING FEES FOR POLICE RELATED SERVICES." 17. VACATION OF EXISTING RIGHT -OF -WAY ALONG KENMORE AVENUE (To be discussed concurrently with City Council Agenda Item No. 15) Staff recommends City Council review D.C. Corporation's request to vacate the existing right -of -way along Kenmore Avenue and either deny or approve the construction of a substandard street. 18. APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 1256 AND RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -010 RELATING TO FIREWORKS SALES PERMITS Staff recommends City Council: 1) Waive further reading, read by title only and introduce for first reading, Ordinance No. 1256 entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF AND ADDING SECTION 93.12 TO CHAPTER 93 OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO FIREWORKS SALES AND PERMITS; and 2) Waive further reading, read by title only and adopt Resolution No. 2005 -010 entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ESTABLISHING THE CITY'S POLICY FOR THE ISSUANCE OF FIREWORKS PERMITS PURSUANT TO SECTION 93.06 OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE." •r APPROVAL OF BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT •' . . (Continued from January • ' Staff recommends Council approve the Business • • Program Guidelines • Program Documents. CLOSED SESSION RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION ■ .' FROM CLOSED SESSION ADJOURNMENT City Council Agenda .•- f I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing agenda was posted on the City Hall bulletin board not less than 72 hours prior to the p meeting. Dated this 27 " day of January, 2005. Rosemary M. Ramirez, CIVIC Chief Deputy City Clerk PLEASE NOTE: Copies of staff reports and supporting documentation pertaining to each item on this agenda are available for public viewing and inspection at City Hall, 2"d Floor Lobby Area or at the Los Angeles County Public Library in the City of Baldwin Park. For further information regarding agenda items, please contact the office of the City Clerk at 626.960.4011, ext. 108 or 626.960 -4011, ext. 466 or via e -mail at rramirez@baldwinpark.com or Inieto a�baldwinpark.com In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the Public Works Department or Risk Management at 626.960.4011. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable staff to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. (28 CFR 34.102.104 ADA TITLE II) City Council Agenda Page 7 This report requests that the City Council reject the claims filed against the City by claimants Mauricio Arzate (7.05.04), and Carrie Roper (1.10.05). In order for the statute of limitations to begin on subject claims, it is necessary for the City Council to reject the claims by order of a motion and that the claimants be sent written notification of said action. It is recommended that the City Council reject the above referenced claims and direct staff to send the appropriate notices of rejection to claimants. Report prepared by: Michelle Cardona, Administrative Clerk I on 11U Me WhrArbliff.-Till AP Honorable Mayor and City Council Members FEB ITEM NO, V�• rJ,5 Sid Mousavi, Interim Chief Executive Officer 0� � SUBJECT: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO ' 1258 RELATh%G • • AMENDING SECTINS 33.05 • THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD THE POSITION OF ASSISTANT CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER The purpose of this report is to request the City Council adopt, on second reading, Ordinance No. 1258, amending sections 33.05 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code to add the position of Assistant Chief Executive Officer in the Unclassified Service and to conform the Ordinance relating to Department Head Employment to the current practices. mzmzglo� At the City Council meeting held on January 19, 2005, Ordinance No. 1258 was introduced for the first reading. In order for the ordinance to become effective, it must be adopted on second reading. Once adopted, the ordinance will add the new position of Assistant Chief Executive Officer to the Unclassified Service position list. This new position will manage politically sensitive, confidential, and complex assignments under the direction of the City Council and the Chief Executive Officer. In addition, The Assistant Chief Executive Officer will represent the City Council and the Chief Executive Officer and the City of Baldwin Park at meetings, hearings, and at specified functions. It is recommended that the City Council waive further reading, read by title only and adopt on second reading, Ordinance No. 1258 entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING SECTION 33.05 OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO UNCLASSIFIED SERVICE EMPLOYEES." Attachment: • Ordinance No. 1258 Is] ION011,42M ilk W2111111 01 LO IS AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING SECTION 33.05 OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE TO PLACE THE POSITION OF ASSISTANT CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER IN THE UNCLASSIFIED SERVICE WHEREAS, the Baldwin Park Municipal Code currently provides that all employees of the City, unless otherwise specified, are included within the Classified Service of the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to create the position of Assistant Chief Executive Officer and to make such position not be subject to the Classified Service of the City; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Subsection A of Section 33.05 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding thereto the following position as a City Council appointee: "(6) Assistant Chief Executive Officer" SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this ordinance and shall have it published in accordance with the provisions of state law. PASSED AND APPROVED this day • 2005. MANUELLOZANO MAYOR Ordinance No. 1258 Pa e 2 g ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss: CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ) I, Rosemary Ramirez, Chief Deputy City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was regularly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on , 2005. That thereafter said Ordinance was duly approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on , 2005, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: ROSEMARY RAMIREZ CHIEF DEPUTY CITY CLERK This report requests City Council approval for the award of contract to Pursuit Technology, Inc. for the above referenced work. With the approval of the FY2004-2005 budget the City Council authorized the purchase of four (4) police patrol vehicles as replacement for 1999-2002 models. It is now necessary to have the various items of special equipment transferred from the outgoing vehicles to the new replacements. In accordance with City Codes a bid package was prepared and noticed publicly. On January 18, 2005 at 11:30 a.m., bids were opened for the subject work. Bids were received from two (2) contractors in the following amounts. 1. Pursuit Technology, Inc. $4,306.60 2. 10-8 Retrofit $5,732.96 The lower bidder, Pursuit Technology, Inc. is an experienced firm who has performed identical work for the City over the previous twenty (20) years. They are consequently familiar with our requirements and will be able to complete the work in accordance with the contract specifications. Sufficient funds have been allocated in FY 2004-2005 in account 130.58.5270 to provide funding for this work. It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Award the contract for the conversion of equipment on Police patrol vehicles to Pursuit Technology, Inc. in the amount of $4,306.60; and 2. Authorize the Mayor to execute the attached Agreement; and 3. Authorize the Director of Public Works to execute any necessary change orders in an amount not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the original contract amount. Jim Dart Public Works Operations Supervisor Attachment Agreement — Pursuit Technologies SN/JD/In THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 2nd day of 20O5.b» and between the CITY {}FBALDW|N PARK, a municipal corporation (hereinafter "CITY") and Pursuit Technology, Lnc. (hereinafter "CONTRACTOR"): The parties hereto do agree as follows: (1) RECITALS: This Agreement is made and entered into with respect to the following facts () That CITY has heretofore solicited sealed public bids for equipment conversion of police patrol vehicles as specified herein and accordance with the plans and specifications in said [:ih/' and ^. /hJ That CONTRACTOR has submitted bid to accomplish said work; and /C\ That the City Council Of CITY has huna1ofons determined, in accordance with all applicable |avva' that CONTRACTOR'S said bid constitutes the )OVveat responsible bid and has heretofore awarded said bid io said CONTRACTOR; and (d) That CONTRACTOR is fully qualified to perform the work as hereinafter described. (D) The following documents, incorporated herein bvUlia reference shall constitute the contract documents referred to in this Agreement. (a) Notice Inviting Sealed Bids dated (h) Contractor's Bid (u) Bid PnJpOS8|S (d) Instructions to Bidders (e) Specifications MU Bidder's Bond orGuarantee (g) Workers Compensation Certificate (h) Liability Insurance Certificate (3) CONTRACTOR agrees to furnish all materials, tools, equipment, apparatus, facilities, transportation, labor and services necessary to perform and complete in a good and workmanlike manner the services in the manner designated in the Agreement and the Contract documents. (4) This Agreement ShoU commence after receipt of the "Notice to Proceed". The work shall be performed iO8 workmanlike manner iD8 reasonable period of time. The Agreement may be terminated 8t any time by8 written letter fn}m any Of the parties iOV0|Vad. The Agreement shall not be assignable or transferable by either party without the express written consent [f the other party. FA . (5) The CONTRACTOR shall hold hG0nkeGs the CITY and th8`C|TY'S ' off icers, agents and employees against all claims, demands, actions and suits brought against any of them arising from the CONTRACTOR'S work under this Agreement. |N WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed on the day and year first above written. ATTEST: City Clerk Date Mayor Date 0y: Title FUFF-P-TA-r-TEM The purpose of this report is for the City Council to approve amendment No. 1 to the original Letter of Agreement for funds for the purchase of transit vehicles. BACKGROUND: On December 15, 2004, the City Council approved a Memorandum of Understanding with the MTA for the use Proposition C funds that will be passed through to El Monte for the purchase of transit vehicles as a part of a joint grant. As was noted at that time, the agreement was necessary as the Proposition C funds were a change in funding source from the original Letter of Agreement. DISCUSSION: After reviewing the MOU approved by the City Council on December 15, 2004, MTA County Counsel determined that it was necessary to amend the original LOA between the City and the MTA to ensure that the change in funding was noted in the LOA. Therefore, Amendment No. 1, attached for the City Council's review, reflects a reduction in federal funding consist with the amount that is funding through Proposition C MOU. Staff recommends that this Amendment, which cleans up inconsistencies between the two agreements with MTA, be approved by the City Council. 1961MA NIOT This agreement does not have a fiscal impact on the City of Baldwin Park. I V 9-416J & I & 1:4 ill I DIA 1101 It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Amendment No. 1 to the LOA with the MTA dated February 1, 2001. Amend No. One, LOAT0007012 AMENDMENT NO. ONE TO LETTER OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AND THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY This Amendment No. 1 to Letter of Agreement (this "Amendment"), is dated as of September 30, 2004, by and between City of Baldwin Park ("Project Sponsor"), and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority ("MTA"). RECITALS: A. Project Sponsor and the MTA entered into that certain Letter of Agreement No. LOA.P0007012, dated February 1, 2001 which was amended on September 30, 2004 (as amended, the "Existing LOA"), which Existing LOA provides for the Local NTD Reporters' Bus Fleet Expansion Program, CFP #7012, PPNO 07-2898 (the "Project"); and B. Whereas, due to the State of California Budget impact on Los Angeles County transportation funding and a State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) amendment request to enable high priority projects to move forward, the MTA and Project Sponsor desire to change the source of funds for the Project. The MTA Board at its February 27, 2004 meeting authorized the grant of Proposition C funds for the Project to replace some of the STIP funds previously programmed to the Project in the Existing LOA. C. Whereas, the MTA and Project Sponsor desire to change the existing funding from a total of $2,958,000 in STIP/RIP funds to $689,000 in Proposition C funds and $2,269,000 in STIP/RIP funds, which have been allocated. D. Whereas, the MTA and Project Sponsor intend to enter into a separate MOU to specify the terms and conditions of the $689,000 Proposition C Funds. E. Project Sponsor and MTA desire to amend the Existing LOA as provided herein. NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows: AGREEMENT: ' 1. Part 1, Paragraph 2 of the Existing LOA is hereby amended by deleting the paragraph in its entirety and replacing it with the following new Paragraph 2: "Amount of Funds Programmed (the "Funds"): $2,269,000 in STIP FUNDS reference as PPNO 07-2898. MTA Board action of July 27, 2000 and Rev.8.19.04 Amend No. One, LOAT0007012 February 18, 2004 programmed the Funds to Project Sponsor for the Project over one year, for Fiscal Year (FY) 2003 — 04." The Funds plus the $689,000 in Proposition C funds granted under the separate MOU result in the total amount of $2,958,000 for the Project." 2. Attachment A to the Existing LOA is hereby amended by deleting it in its entirety and replacing it with the following Attachment A-1 attached hereto. 3. Attachment B to the Existing LOA is hereby amended by deleting it in its entirety and replacing it with the following Attachment B-1 attached hereto. 4. Attachment C to the Existing LOA is hereby amended by deleting it in its entirety and replacing it with the following Attachment C-1 attached hereto. 5. Part 1 of the Existing LOA, is hereby amended by adding the following new sections to the end thereof: "13. Should MTA determine there are insufficient Funds available for the Project, MTA may terminate this LOA by giving written notice to Project Sponsor at least thirty (30) days in advance of the effective date of such termination. If the Project is terminated pursuant to this section, MTA will not reimburse Project Sponsor any costs incurred after the termination date, except those necessary to return any facilities modified by the Project's construction to a safe state. The MTA's share of these costs will be consistent with the established funding percentages outlined in the LOA. 14. The obligation for MTA to program the Funds for the Project is subject to sufficient Funds being made available for the Project by the MTA Board, the United States Government or the State of California, as applicable. If such Funds are not made available for the Project, this LOA shall be void and have no further force and effect, and MTA shall have no obligation to program the Funds for the Project, unless otherwise agreed to by the MTA." 6. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Existing LOA remains in full force and effect as originally executed. All rights and obligations of the parties under the Existing LOA that are not expressly amended by this Amendment shall remain unchanged by this Amendment. Rev.8.19.04 Amend No. One, LOAT0007012 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment No. 1 to be duly executed and delivered as of the above date. LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY By: Roger Snoble Chief Executive Officer Approved as to form: Approved as to form: Raymond G. Fortner, Jr. County Counsel City of Baldwin Park U91A Manuel Lozano Mayor Date: Approved to form: Stephanie Scher City Attorney Date: Rev.8.19.04 Opp • r ii l 1 i r • • • U) U O U O O CL L- 10 U Qi .0 U tIS E (6 N C O E (B U O 0 O N m U) O i 0- a) i O U C O i i O U r r �r 1 r' 4w :op, �1 � r • tl s r 0 0 0 l > ? ?: Lo N 00 C\T C4 .. ... c`�a u. 0 0 L 0 0 6-r 0 c» ;»• O O 0o 0 O O (}: 00 66, Ci "q- Ff3 � 0 M O O O O OLoU)O N N t .� M F- -r, W .2.0.2.2 •V •� •� .� Q C� O m J OO 00 -� as aat9 O WQ„ �QF- t1� ¢ O J OR CL Q.Q.J.r <�.., �UPL~L �. (n LL F- s r ATTACHMENT C -1 SCOPE OF WORK Acquire 16 buses for four cities that voluntarily report National Transit Database (NTD) statistics. The four cities include Baldwin Park, Compton, Monterey Park and West Covina. New expansion buses for these cities will add transit capacity and improve the consolidation NTD reporting program by encouraging additional participation and ensuring continued reporting. The purpose of his report is to request that the City Council award a contract for the construction of Maine Avenue Improvements, CIP 632, to Gentry Brothers, Inc. in the amount of $1,219,939.25. Presently Maine Avenue, between Ramona Boulevard and Clark Street, is a two-lane road with a concrete median. This causes traffic congestion and creates serious problems for emergency vehicles attempting to pass through. The Maine Avenue Improvement includes the removal of the concrete median and widening of the street on both sides to provide two lanes in each direction (four lanes total) to relieve traffic congestion, the construction of traffic signals, landscaping, streetlights, curb and gutter, sidewalk, asphalt pavement and striping. In accordance with the provisions of the Government Code, the Notice Inviting bids was published and seven (7) bids were opened on January 12, 2005 and declared publicly. A summary of bids is attached for Council's review (see Attachment "A"). Gentry Brothers, Inc. was the lowest responsible bidder and has performed satisfactorily on similar projects for the City of Pomona, Covina Federal Insurance Co. and the City of Baldwin Park. Under this project the City solicited three options and the lowest responsible bidder (Gentry Brothers, Inc.) has submitted the following: 1 Demolition & Construction during regular hours $1,219,939.25 Demolition during nighttime hours and construction 2. during regular hours $1,270,939.25 3. Demolition & Construction during nighttime hours $1,340,93925 Construction during nighttime hours will create noise issues and will disrupt the residents surrounding the project area, therefore, staff recommends that the City Council award a contract to Gentry Brothers, Inc. for Option No. 1 (Demolition and Construction during regular hours). This project is part of the Capital Improvement Projects for FY 2004-2005 and the Engineer's Estimate was $1,190,000. The lowest bid submitted by Gentry Brothers, Inc. is $1,219,939.25. Advanced Applied Engineering, Inc. will provide inspections and project management. In FY 2003-2004, the City was awarded a grant in the amount of $98,000 from the Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration for the construction of this project. This grant is re-appropriated by Congress every year but due to deficits, the Congress has not re-appropriated the Transportation funds. According to Diane Teece, Federal Highway Administration Official, it is uncertain when Congress will take action on this item, so we will not receive this grant this fiscal year or even in the future. FISCAL IMPACT The following are the funds budgeted for this project: Prop "C" funds from FY 03-04 Prop "C" funds FY 04-05 Gas Tax funds from FY 03-04 Gas Tax funds FY 04-05 Total funds available this year Funds needed for this project: Design costs of the project Construction costs of the project 10% Contingencies Inspection and Management Soils Testing Southern California Edison (streetlights) Total $500,000 $350,000 $235,000 $75,000 $1,160,000 $97,440 $1,219,939 $122,000 $80,000 $10,000 $50,000 $1,579,379 Additional Funds Needed $419,379 It is recommended that a portion of the additional funds required in the amount of $419,379 be appropriated from Gas Tax funds ($69,379) and Prop "C" funds ($350,000). There is no impact on the General Fund. It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Award the contract for the construction of Maine Avenue to Gentry Brothers, Inc. in the amount of $1,219,939.25; and 2. Authorize the Mayor to execute the attached Agreement; and 3. Authorize an additional $35,000 for the inspection and construction management; and 4. Authorize staff to carry over Gas Tax funds in the amount of $235,000 and Prop "C" funds in the amount of $500,000 from FY 2003-2004 to FY 2004-2005; and 5. Authorize the Finance Director to make the necessary budget amendments and appropriations in the amount of $419,379 (Gas Tax funds of $69,379 and Prop "C" funds of $350,000) to the Capital Improvement Project No. 632 (Maine Avenue Improvements) for FY 04-05; and 6. Authorize the Director of Public Works to execute any necessary change orders in an amount not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the original contract amount. Arjan Idnani Assistant Public Works Director Attachments Exhibit "A" — Bid Results Agreement — Gentry Brothers, Inc. Exhibit "A" BID OPENING Project: Maine Avenue Improvements, CIP 632 Date: January 12,2005 Time: 11:00 a.m. 2ND FLOOR LOBBY- BALDIN PARK CITY HALL , A71 Signafu e Date Name of Bidder Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 1. Gentry Brothers, Inca 19 /,270 9 / a 2. Sully- Miller Contracting Co. (� � 4 a5 3. Los Angeles Engineering, Inc. 1 7. '-I,94 W `Is 4. E.C. Construction Co. 3 1 C)97 I J 5. Sequel Contractors, Inc. !! 6. All American Asphalt God 9 7. Excel Paving Company ) I 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. , A71 Signafu e Date - This Agreement (hereafter "4g[e8menr\iS made and entered into hv and between the City Of NTQYOROTHB8S, im B@|UvNO Park, @ g8D6r8| law city (hereafter "Citv") and ~~ (hereafter "Contractor"). - _ -- _- The parties hereto agree 8Sfollows: SECTION 1. Recitals. This Agreement is [O8d8 and SQt8[8d into with respect to the following facts: /8\ That City has heretofore solicited sealed public bids for Maine Avenue Improvements C|PG32 (hereafter "Project"); and (b) That Contractor has submitted a timely bid proposing to accomplish the work and material required for said Project; and (c) That the City Council ofCity has determined, iO accordance with all applicable laws, that COn1[OCt0r'S said bid constitutes the lowest responsible bid and has awarded said bid to said Contractor; and ' ' kj\ That Contractor iS fully qualified tO perform the work required k) complete the Project, aDd has agreed to d0SO upon the terms set forth iO this Agreement; and (8) That the City Council has determined that the public interest, convenience and necessity require the execution of this Agreement. SECTION 2. Contract Documents. The Contract Documents, are as set forth in Exhibit A hereto, which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this Agreement as though set forth iDfull. Any discrepancies or ambiguities between Contract Documents shall be resolved by the City Engineer. SECTION 3. Work. Contractor agrees t0 perform all work, and supply all material, necessary and convenient to cause the Project to be timely completed in accordance with the Contract Documents, SECTION 4. Change Orders, Change VrdB[S Sh8U be approved only in 8CCOrdaOSe with the (a) City Sh8| notify the Contractor of all pertinent data and 8 UeSCrbtiOO Of the addition Or deletion; and 35 (b) Contractor shall submit to City in writing, ten (10) days in advance, quotations of the increased price for items added, if any, or decrease for items of work proposed to be deleted. If the parties agree upon the terms of a change order, it shall be reduced to writing and executed by the parties hereto. Quotes for items of work added or credits for items of work deleted shall be based upon the Contractor's Bid Proposal for the same or similar items of work set forth therein, provided such costs shall be adjusted to take into account any cost of living adjustment, based upon cost of living calculations issued for the Los Angeles- Anaheim area by the U.S. Department of Labor. The method of payment for _ additional work shall be made as provided in the Contract Documents. (c) No payment shall be made for any work not included and described in the Contract Documents unless a signed change order exists authorizing the same. SECTION 5. Term. This Agreement shall be in effect for a period of one hundred - twenty (120) consecutive working days, commencing on ESL& 2 B, J` The term may be extended by mutual agreement of the parties hereto, expressed in a written amendment to this Agreement. SECTION 6. Compensation. Contractor shall accept as full compensation for his /her services rendered hereunder in the amounts set forth in the Contract Documents, together with any amount authorized by an approved change order. Contractor shall be entitled to progress payments in accordance with the Contract Documents. SECTION 7. Warranty. The parties hereto represent and warrant to each other that the persons executing this Agreement on their behalf are fully authorized and empowered to enter this Agreement and that no consent or approval from any other person, group, or entity is necessary to the enforceability of this Agreement. SECTION 8. Binding Effect. This Agreement and each and every covenant, condition and term herein, shall be binding upon an inure to the benefit of the respective successors in interest to the parties to this Agreement. SECTION 9. Severability. If any term, condition or covenant of this Agreement, or the application hereof to any person or circumstance shall be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement, other than those paragraphs held invalid or unenforceable, shall be unaffected thereby and each remaining term, covenant or condition of this Agreement shall be valid and shall be enforced to the fullest extent permitted by law. SECTION 10. Indemnity. Contract does hereby indemnify and hold the City, it's appointed and elected officials, agents and employees free and harmless from any claim, demand or judgment arising out of the activities of Contractor's officers, agents or employees in performing services pursuant to this Agreement. SECTION 11. Insurance. Notwithstanding the provib a.f relating to required insurance coverage, Contractor's indemnity obligation z C J _ � MC;U�an W of this Agreement shall not be deemed satisfied solely by Contractor's compliance with this Section 11. At all times during the term or any extended term of this Agreement, Contractor shall maintain in force a policy 09 or policies of liability insurance in minimum coverage's, amounts and companies as approved by the City Engineer. Contractor shall maintain all insurance required by this Agreement, and by applicable law including, but not limited to, a policy of Workers' Compensation Insurance covering all his /her employees or be self- insured with respect to such Workers' Compensation in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Certificates evidencing the existence of such insurance coverage shall be filed with the City prior to the effective date -0f this Agreement, and correct certificates shall be maintained on file with the City Clerk during the term hereof. Each such certificate shall bear endorsements naming the City, it's elected and appointed officers, agents and employees, as additional insured on all such policies of -liability insurance. Each said certificate shall also provide -that the policy to which it relates shall not be materially altered or terminated except after thirty (30) days notice to City. SECTION 12. Liquidated Damaqes. The parties agree that any delay in the completion of work required pursuant to this Agreement by Contractor will result in substantial damage to City. The parties also have agreed that the nature and extent of damage to City in the event of delay in completion of such work would be difficult if not impracticable to ascertain with any degree of accuracy. Accordingly, the parties have agreed that this provision for liquidated damages is reasonable and necessary. The parties have agreed, as a part of the bid process, that the sum of $500.00 per calendar day for each day's delay in the performance by Contractor of the work hereunder, is a reasonable sum as and for liquidated damages and shall not be deemed a penalty. SECTION 13. Compliance with all Laws. Contractor does hereby agree to comply with the Baldwin Park Municipal Code and all other applicable laws. SECTION 14. Amendment. This Agreement shall not be modified except by an agreement in writing signed by both parties. SECTION 15. Assignment. This Agreement shall not be assigned, in whole or in part, by Contractor, without the prior written consent of City. SECTION 16. Notices. All notices pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing, and shall be given by personal service upon the person to be notified or by depositing the same in the custody of the United States Postal Service or it's lawful successor, postage prepaid, addressed as followed: City: Director of Public Works City of Baldwin Park Agency 14403 East Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, CA 91706 37 SECTION 17. E}ffective Date. The effective date of this Agreement shall be i - � 2, 20 ,V S- . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first written above. DATED: ,20 - ATTEST: City: City of Baldwin Park rMIdNE IF, I ' " D I T U TT �. T CITY OF BALDWIN PARK & F.TKY.—T.-T�-T;3wo FEB - 2 The purpose of this report is for the City Council to allow the payment of Warrants and Demands against the City of Baldwin Park. The payroll of the City of Baldwin Park consisting of check numbers 160733 to 161114, inclusive, voids: 160733, 160738, 160744, and 160789 for the period of January 2, 2005 through January 15, 2005 inclusive, have been presented and hereby ratified, in the amount of $478,347.34. General Warrants, including check numbers 148369 to 148626 inclusive, in the total amount of $928,115.17, constituting claims and demands against the City of Baldwin Park, are here with presented to the City Council as required by law, and the same hereby ratified. Pursuant to Section 37208 of the Government Code, the Chief Executive Officer or designee does hereby certify to the accuracy of the demands hereinafter referred to and to the availability of funds for payment thereof. City v| Baldwin Park Jan '116.20C15 09.31am Page 1 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check/ACH#'s1�83169 to 1Q626 Payment Type Check Vend# Vendor Name Remit#Paye 821 POSTMASTER PO BOX FEE PAYMENT Cloim# General Description 65514 CALL BOX FEE ' PO4 Stat Comtnact#{mmice# 6L Distribution 131-14-5430-064 Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 148369 01/111/05 4,12.00 Imc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 81/11/105 412.00 4112.00 Gross Amount Work 0nder% Actfd Description 412.00 CALL BOX FE[ Vemd# Vendor- Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7615��IG��@ OF CODE ENFORCEMENT AP 148-372 01/1205 120.00 Claim# General Description 65193 MEMBERSHIP DUES GAIL BISHOP GEORGE R0DRlGUEZ PO# Stat Contract# ]mmice# }nvc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount AACE101844 10/14/04 60.00 0.80 60.OU 0 1O/14/84 68.O0 0.80 bU.00 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rden# ActCd Description 120-47-5240-031 120.00 6 BISHVP, 6 R00RIGUEZ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# C6k Date Check Amount Sep 1499 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEER AP 148373 01/12/05 120.00 I'laim# General Description 65192 MEMBERSHIP DUES GEORGE NELSON SUZlE AYALA P0# Stat Contract# lnvvicc4 1nvc Df Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount AACE102208 81/111/05 60.80 0.08 60.00 AACE101845 10/14/04 68.00 0.00 60.00 6L Distribution Vend# Vendor Name 878 BEVERLY J HERNAN0EI 2oim# General Description 65349 REIMB MONTHLY EXPENSES PO#St8t&mtract# I��u� GL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rde»# Act-Cd Description 120.00 S AYALA. G NELSON Remit# Payee Bank Check# Ohk, Date Check Amount Sep AP 148374 01/12/05 132.00 Imn Df Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Piet Amount 01/12/05 11321.00 8.00 132.00 Gross Amount Work Orden ActCd Description 132.00 REIMB EXPENSES `S-AP Accounts Payabl Re�as �.1.5 N*APR708 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26.2005 09/31am Page 2 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check/ACH#'s1�8369 to 14-8626 Payment Type Check Vemd# Vendor, Name Remit# Payee Bank Chcck# Chk Date Check Amount Sep �1 �� 2�� � i��5 U��� 40.� Claim# General Description 65194 REGISTRATION 01/20V05 6IN# KNIGHT MICHELLE ALVES PV# Sfat Contract# lnvoice# {nvc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/11/05 40.00 0.00 4Q.00 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work Vnden# ActCd Description 132-16-5330 40.00 6 KN{GHT, M ALVES 81/20/05 _-__-_______-_________--___-___________-----__---__-__----__--_-_____--_----_____--__-_____ ` 3%.AP Accounts Payable Release 6,1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26,2005 09.3lam Page 3 Payinent History. Bank Ap Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check/ACH#'s1q36Yto 1�860 Payment Type Check Vemd# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Ohk Date Check Amount Sep 41336 CPSRpTC AP 14830 01/12/05 3.757.00 Claim# General Description 65195 MANUELCARRIL0. JR. CONF 31/1005-3/12/05 PO4 Stat Comtoact# Immice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount O 0/11/05 289.00 Gross Amount 0.00 289.00 Q- Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rJen# ActCd Description Claiw# General Description 100-71-5330 289.00 65199 ARMANDO NAVA 3/10-12/05 MCARR[LLO 3/10-12/135 Clain# General Description Ime 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used 0 01/11/05 65196 MARIA MOREN 3/10-112/05 0.80 6L Distribution Gnoss Amount Work 0»den# ActCd Description PO4 Stat Contract# lmmice# lnvc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/11/05 289,00 0.00 289.00 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rden4 ActCd Description 100-72-5330 289.80 M MORENV 31110/05-3/12/05 C]aim# General Description 65197HHERNANDEZ3/10-1205 PO# Stat Dmtract# Immice# ]nvc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 81/11/05 289.00 0.00 289.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0nder# ActCd Description 100-76-5330 289.08 H HERNANDEZ Claim# General Description 65198 lRMA 6ARClA 03/111+12/05 PO# Stat Comtnact# }mmiceg {nvc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used U 0/11/05 289.00 0.00 Q- Distribution Gross Amount Work 0ndeA Act"I'd Description 1OO-73-5330 289.00 I GARCIA 3/10+12/05 Claiw# General Description 65199 ARMANDO NAVA 3/10-12/05 PO# Stat Contract# lmoice# Ime 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used 0 01/11/05 289.00 0.80 6L Distribution Gnoss Amount Work 0»den# ActCd Description 100-72-5330 289.00 A NAVA 3/1003-3/12/05 Claim# General Description 65200 IMBALVARB3/10-12/05 PO# Stat Contract8 Immice# {nyc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used 0 01/11/05 0.00 0.00 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work Vrder# ActCd Description 1OO-72-5J30 0.00 l ALVAREZ 31110-12/05 C}aimK General Description 65201 MONICAKlLLIAH 3/10-12/05 .,1,3.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 Net Amount 289.00 Net Amount 289.00 Net Amount By SANDRA A (SANDRA) 'ity of Baldwin Park �n�. �� �:�� �� 4 ayment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check/ACH#'s148369 'LO 148626 Payment Type Check PO# Stat CvntractK lnvobce# lmm Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 8 01/11/05 4-189.00 0.00 289.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rden# AchCd Description 100-74-5330 289.00 M KlLL1AM 3/10-12/05 "laim# General Description 652202 MARTHA REYES 3/10-12/05 PO# Stat Contract4 Invoioe# GL Distribution 100-71-5330-253 2aim# General Description 65203 RITA VAZQUEZ 3/10-12/05 PO4 Stat 0mtract# Immice# GL Distribution 'laim# General Description 6520�0MA TARANGO 3/0�2-1/05 PO#S+at&mtract# Immioe# GL Distribution 100-71-5330-251 2aim# General Description 65205 ANA LUJAN 3/10-12/05 lnvr Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Met Amount 01/11/D5 289.00 0.00 289.08 Gross Amount Work 0rder# ActCd Description 289.00 N REYES 3/10-12/05 Imc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0/11/05 289.00 0.00 289.00 Gross Amount Work 0rden# ActCd Description ' 28900 R VAZQUEZ 3/10-12/05 ' lnvc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 01/11/05 280.00 0.08 289.013 Gross Amount Work 0rdeA ActCd Description` 289.80 I TARAN60 3/10-12/05 PO# Stat Dmtua t# Invoce4 lmc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount O 01/11/05 189.L11 0.80 289.08 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd bescpiptmn 100-71-5330-252 289.00 A LUJAN 3/10-12/05 2aim# General Description 65206 G CONDE 3/10-12/05 PO# Stat &:tnact# Immice# ]mn 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 0/11/05 289.80 0.00 2,80.00 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rden# ActCd Description 100-71-5330-250 ��,00 G C0NDE 3/10-12/05 Jaim# General Description 6520 RALPH 6ALVAN71/10-12/05 PO# Stat Gmtranf# Immice# lmn 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount D 01/11/05 0.00 0.80 0.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rderN AcfCd Description 100-71-5330-255 0.00 R GALVAN 3/10-12/05 2aim# General Description 65208 GEORGE CAMACHO 3/10-12/06 2S.AP Accounts Payable Rel--ase 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2005 09:31am Page 5 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 0000/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check/ACH#'a 148369 to 14860 Payment Type Check PO#Stat0mtract# Invoine# GL Distribution C,laim# Genera] Description 652139 CANDICE OROZ0J7/10-12/05 PO#Stat0mtrant#Immice# 6L Distribution 100-71-5330-257 Vend# Vendor Name '7620 DAILY BULLETIN Imm Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 01/11/05 289.00 0'00 289.00 6poaa Amount Work 0»dcr# ActCd Description 289.00 6 CAMACHN 3/10-12/05 Imn 0f Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 81/11/05 289.00 0.00 289.00 Gross Amount Nvnk 0rdev0 ActCd Description 289.00 COROZCO 3/10-12/05 -__---__----______-________---____-__---_____-___-_-___-___--___ Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 148378* 01/12/05 306.36 C"laim# General Description 65210 AD-DEPUTY CITY CLERK 11/14/04-11/18/04 A/C# 026875 R# Stut Comtract# {mwice# lnvc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount S055555B18A 11/14/O4 306.36 0.00 J[N.Jh 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rden# AcfCd Description 100-15-5239 306.36 AD-DEP CITY CLERK 11/1�-18/O4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vend# Vendor Nome Remjt# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 2301 DEPT OF JUSTICE ACCOUNTING OFFICE- AP 148379 01/12/05 51.80 Claiw% General Description 65211 FINGERPRINT APPS PO:#StatCmtract# Invoioe# 11 Distribution 100-'125-5000 Yend# Vendor Name 71621 0IAZ & ASSOCIATES Claim# General Description 65212 SALARY SURVEY (CITY CLERK/ASSIST) PO# Sfa� Cvn�ec�� Invnioe# 70 6L Distribution 100-15-5008 lmc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12/0/04 51.00 0.00 51.00 Gross Amount Work 0nden# ActCd Description 51I0 FINGERPRINTS ��i' Bank Check# Chk D8te Check Amount Sep AP 148380 01/1205 5700.00 lmn 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11/23/04 500.00 0.00 5110.00 Gross Amount Work 0rden% ActCd Description 500.00 SURVEY-CITY CLERK/ASSIST ZS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1,3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park .Jan 26, 2005 09:31am Page 6 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #'S 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check Vend# Vendor Dame Remit# Payee Bank Check# Ch'K bate Check Amount Sep 7501 DIMENSIONS UNLIMITED INC AP 148381 01/12/215 21,677.84 Claim# General Description 65213 HAZ MITIGATION PLAN SRV DEPT -OCT 114 PO# .tat Contract# invoice# rnvc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12075 O 2004 -60 12/01/04 21,677.84 0.00 21,677.84 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Ctrder# ActCd Description 132 -16- 5000 21,677.84 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY20041'05* CONTRACT TO PREPARE THE HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN PO Liquidation Amount 132 -16 -5000 21,677.84 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 1919 DOWNEY VENDORS AP 148382 01/12/05 216.43 Claim# General Description 65350 COFFEE SUPPLIES PO# !tat Contract# Invoice# 11604 U 61709 GL Distribution 121 -68 -5210 PO Liquidation 121 -68 -5210 Invc Dt Grass Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 09/28/04 216.43 0.00 216.43 Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 216.43 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004/05* COFFEE SERVICE AT THE CITY YARD Amount 70.99 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 6247 EMAE INTERNATIONAL AP 148383 01112105 175,744.13 Claim# General Description 65351 PROGRESS BILLING #6 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Inve Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11799 C 6 12/31/04 31,917.45 0.00 31,917.45 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 120 -53 -5020 -619 31,917.45 1 EA *ANNUAL FY2004/05) CONSTRUCTION OF BARNES PARK IMPROVEMENTS, CIEP 619, PO Liquidation 120 -53 -5020 -619 Claim# General Description 65352 PROGRESS BILL #6 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 11800 O 6 GL Distribution 139 -53 -5020 -619 PO Liquidation 139 -53 -5020 -619 Amount 31,917.45 Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11/31/04 I- Q,826.58 0.00 143,826.58 Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 143,826.58 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY20041'05* CONSTRUCTION OF BARNES PARK IMPROVEMENTS, CIP 6190 Amount 143,826.58 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2005 09;31am Page 7 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check/ACH#'s 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7500 EQUIPMENT TRUCK ELECTRIC AP 148384 01/12/05 474.44 Claim# General Description 652214 MISC REPAIRS PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12056 0 2600 11/04/04 172.41 0.00 172.+0 ..) 6j '19 L 12/10/04 96.98 0.00 96.98 2645 12/16/04 205.06 0.00 205.06 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 130-58-51, 270 474.4 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY12004/05* REBUILD ELECTRICAL LIFT MOTORS FOR STREET SWEEPERS PO Liquidation Amount 130-58-5270 4*74.44 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 797 EXPERIAN AP 148385 01/12/05 75.96 Claim# General Description 65215 CREDIT REPORTS PO# 'tat Contract# invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Piet Amount CD5080006314 11/26/04 75.96 0.00 75.96 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 120-43-5030-030 75.96 CREDIT REPORTS Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount 'Sep, 1233 FRED PRYOR SEMINARS AP 148386 01/12/05 10.00 Claim# General Description 65216 SEMINAR-MICHAEL TERAN 1/12/05 EVENT# 29417 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/11/05 149.00 0.00 149.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100-46-5340 149.00 M TERAN 1/12/05 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 370 FRED'S RADIATOR SERVICE AP 148387 01/12/05 354.03 'Iaim# General Description 65217 MISSC REPAIRS PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 118712 0 08972 11/23/04 184.03 0.00 184.03 08973 12/01/04 80.00 0.00 80.00 118474 2/11/04 90.00 0.00 90.00 13L Distribution 130-58-5270 PO Liquidation 130-58-5270 Gross Amount Work Opdep# ActCd Description 354.03 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2004/05* RADIATOR REPAIRS Amount 354 .13 --------------------- By SANDRA A (SANDRA) "CS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 City of Baldwin Park Jan 0.2005 09:31am Page 8 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 'L0 991199/9999 Check/ACH#'s 1�8369 to 148626 Payment Type Check Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 4465 FUTURE DATA SYSTEMS` INC. AP 148388 01/12/05 1,325.12 Clain# General Description 65218 PC LOAN-JAMES KOLBACH PO# Stat Cont»act% Invoice# Invc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 81/11/05 1.325.12 0.08 1.325.12 6L Distribution 6z*aa Amount Work Vrden# ActCd Description 100-00-1125 1.325.12 PC LOAN-JAMES K0LBACH ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bonk Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 413 G.K. HALL PRINTING AP 148389 01/12/05 228.41 Claio# General Description 65219 BUSINESS CARDS PO# Stat Contoac(# }mwice4 [mr 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 35852 12/09/04 117.99 0.00 117.99 Q- Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rden% ActCd Description 131-14-5440-00 117,99 BUS CARDS C]aim# General Description 65220 BUSINESS CARDS PO# Stat Comtract# lmmice# Invr 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 35869 12Y16/04 118.42 0.00 118.42 @- Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rder# ActCd Description ____-___-_-___----_--__--_-_-__-____--_--_-___---__-_______----_---_--__--_____-__-__--_--_-_____--__-_ 131-14-544}-06] 110.42 BUS CARDS Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bonk Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 382 6F0A AP 148390 01/12/05 560.00 Claio# General Description 65222 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 0301/05-2/28/06 HE@NIE APODACA PO4 Stat Contnact% Invoice# lnvc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0051001 12/15/04 560.00 0.00 560.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0nden# ActCd Description 100-12-5240 560.00 REINEWAL-H APO0ACA 3/1/05-2/28/06 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Veoo# Vendor- Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 3608 GMF SOUND, INC AP 148391 01/12/05 705.00 Claim# General Description 65221 HEADSET SYSTEM R# Stat Contnact# lnvvice# Imr 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12146 C 27051 12/03/04 705.80 8,00 705.00 6L Distn4bution Gross' Amount Work Or6er# ActCd Description 131-13-5724-145 705.00 1 EA EXCHANGE HEADSET USED IN COUCIL CHAMBER T0 RF HEADSET SYSTEM P0 Liquidation Amount 131-13-5724~145 705.00 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 M*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2005 09:31am Page 10 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 001100/0080 to 99/99/9949 Check/ACH#'s 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check Vend4 Vendor Name 400 GRAINGER, INC. Claim# General Description 65223 MISC SUPPLIES Remit#Payee Bank Checkt Ohk0ate Check Amount Sep 1GRAlNGER DEPT440-82333�693 AP 148392 01/1-2/05 2.718.76 PO# Stat Contract# InmioL-4 11714 0 457-345510-� 11/29/04 �57-345511-2 0J0 457-375171-8 11/29/04 457-375172-6 0.00 457-542985-9 11/30/0� 45T-542Y86r7 0.00 457+031592-1 11/3084 457+054841-1 0.00 457-058417-9 1201/% 970-071886-7 0.00 457-245718-4 12/01/04 457-245719-2 GL Distribution 30.54 100-57-5210 �8.57 127-57-5210 P0 Liquidation 100-57-5210 127-57-5210 Clain# General Description 65224 MT.CC SUPPLIES Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11/29/04 76.21 0J0 76.2111 11/29/04 72.29 0.00 72.29 11/30/0� 164.01 0.00 i64.01 11/3084 19.54 0.00 19.54 1201/% 37.89 0.00 37,89 12/01/04 "A7.54 0.00 30.54 12y08/04 �8.57 0,00 4&57 12/00/04 29.42 0.00 29.42 12108104 61.81 0.00 61.81 12/09/04 52.05 ` 0,00 52.05 12110104 105.98 0.00 105.98 12/113/04 176.72 0'00 176.72 Gross Amount Wonk0ndev% AcfCd Description P0 Liquidation 490.74 Amount 1 EA *ANMUAL-FY2004/85* ELECTRICAL PARTS & SUPPLIES~ i80-57-521O-211 GENERAL FUND PORTION 304.41 384.29 1EAPARKS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PORTION Amount 490.74 384.29 PO# Stat Gmtrant4 Invv ;-e4 Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11715 0 457-245719-2 12/1004 92.17 0.00 92,17 457-361544-7 12Y13/04 61.23 0.00 61.23 457-435435-5 12/14/04 121.21 0.00 121.21 01321-446346-5 12/14/04 16.94 0.80 16.94 001-459056'6 12/14/84 12.86 0.00 12.86 GL Distribution @mso Amount Work 0nden# ActCd Description 100-57-5210_211 304.41 i EA *ANNUAL-fY2084/85* ELECTRICAL PARTS & SUPPLIES AT TEEN CENTER P0 Liquidation Amount i80-57-521O-211 304.41 Claiu# General Description 65225 MTSC SUPPLIES PO#StafContract#Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12218 C 934-874120-9 12/06/04 1,539.32 0.00 1,5319.32 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0nden# Act-Cd Description 150f0-2172 1,539.32 60 EA BOX, 18%18X18 P0 Liquidation Amount 150f0-2172 1,539.32 ___-_-_------__--___-_-______________---___-_-__--__-_____---_---_____----__----_---____----_-__-__ CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 20115 09:31am Page 11 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Gates 00/00/C000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #'s 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check 'lend# Vendor game Remit# Payee Bank C }-peck# Chk Gate Check Amount Sep 5647 GRAND PARK INN AP 148394* 01112105 500.00 Claim# General Description 65353 FAMILY SRV CENTER VOUCHER PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/12/05 500.00 0.00 500.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work; order# ActCd Description 120 -43 -5000 -0185 500.00 FAM SRV CTR VOUCHER ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk irate Check Amount Sep 7581 GRANICUS AP 148395 01/12/05 800.00 Claim# General Description 65227 JAN SERV P0# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 579 12/15/04 800.00 0.00 800.00 GL Distribution Cross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 131 -13 -5734 800.00 JAN SERVICE'] Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank: Check# Chk Gate Check Amount Sep 7452 GRANICUS, INC AP 148396 01/12/05 800.00 Claim# General Description 65226 NOVEMBER SERV PO# Stat C €_ontract# Invoice# Inv€_ Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12172 O 542 10/15/04 800.110 0.00 800.1110 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 131-13-5260 800.00 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004/05# MANAGEMENT SERVICE ON THE RECORDING SYSTEM IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 0800 /MONTH FOR 7 MONTHS) PO Liquidation Amount ------------------------------------------------------------------_------------------------------------------------------------ 131 -13 -5260 800.00 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 4182 GUS NETWORKS, INC, AP 148397 01/12/05 17.00 Claim# General Description 65228 SERV 12/20/04- 01/19/05 PO# Stat Contra {t# Invoice# Invc Dt gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 84379- 12/20/04 17.00 0.00 17.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 1311-13 -52601 17.00 SERV 12/20/04- 01/19/115 ':CS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR7Ctt} By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2005 09c31am Page 12 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 9919919999 Check /ACH #'s 148369 to 14.8626 Payment Type Check Vend# vendor, game Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk mate Check Amount ;:yep 3842 HALBERT BROTHER'S, INC, AP 148398 01/12/05 185.00 Claim# General description 65229 RECITAL SERV PO4 'Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11569 O S003224 1113a i/04 185.00 0.00 185.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order'# ActCd Description 100 -24 -5210 185.1_10 1 EA *ANNUAL -FY2 104105 ' MONTHLY RENTAL FEES FOR EVIDENCE STORAGE PO Liquidation Amount 1011 -24 -5210 185.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------_--_------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor, Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check. Amount ''Sep 5062 HARRIS COMPUTER SYSTEMS AP 148399 01/12/05 1,405.00 Claim# General Description 65230 JAN TECH ASSIST PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Inve Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11550 0 MN000512 12/01/04 1,405.00 0.00 1,405.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work OrdeE# ActCd Descr,iption 131 -13 -5260 1,405.00 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004 /05* FINANCIAL AND PAYROLL SYSTEM TECHNICAL SUPPORT & MAINTENANCE, CUSTOMER ID #BAL01 PO Liquidation Amount 131 -13 -5260 1,405.00 Vend# Vendor dame Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount 'yep 6186 HIRSCH & ASSOCIATES, INC. AP 148400 01/12/05 2,104.78 Claim# General Description 65231 BARNES PARK RENOVATION PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11966 0 0226E PB #5 12/21/04 2,104.78 0.00 2,104.78 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work €i -deE#1 ActCd Description 139 -53- 5020 -619 2,104.78 1 EA *ANN UAL- FY2004/05* PROVIDE ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVICES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF BARNES PARK, CiP 6190 BO Liquidation Amount 139 -53- 5020 -619 2,104.78 CC'S.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1 .3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2005 09:31am Page 13 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #`s 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Punk Check# Chk Date Check Amount ':yep 4878 HOME DEPOT AP 148401 101112/05 2,380.18 Claim# General Description 65233 MISC SUPPLIES POI Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12097 0 00910101 121/28/04 320.11 0.00 320.11 3225574 11/04/04 137.42 0.00 137.42 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work tlyder# ActCd Description 121 -68- 5210 -211 457.53 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004/05* LUMBER AND HARDWARE SUPPLIES FOR TEEN CENTER/'.`KATE PARK Pty Liquidation Amount 121 -68- 5210 -211 457.53 :Iaim# General Description 65234 MI SC SUPPLIES PC1# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 1,1792 0 8091799 11/019/04 27.01 0.00 27.00 0272248 12/17/04 21.63 0.00 21.63 0167994 12/17/04 104.92 0.00 104.92 GL Distribution Gross Amount Mork Order# ActCd Description 1'14 -61- 5210 -i X94 153.55 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004/05* LUMBER AND MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES PO Liquidation Amount 114 -61 -5210 -094 153.55 vlaim# General Description 65236 MISS SUPPLIES PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12121 0 7249251 11/10/04 79.40 0.00 79.40 3020474 11/24/04 59.49 0.00 59.49 8226622 11/29/04 87.23 10.100 87.23 901 1005 12/08/04 103.00 0.00 1103.00 8273185 12/09/04 74.510 0.00 74.51 31193787 1_2/14/04 325.30 0.00 325.310 322741190 12/14/04 144.04 0.00 144.04 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 121 -68 -5210 872.96 1 EA #ANNUAL- FY2004/015g LUMBER AND HARDWARE SUPPLIES PO Liquidation Amount 19-1 -68 -5210 872.96 Maim# General Description 65237 MISC SUPPLIES PO4 ':,tat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11591 D 8162777 11/09/04 41.14 0.00 41.14 0595762 11/17/04 108.47 10,00 1.08.47 62 26717 12/01/114 67.91 (1.00 67.91 9226719 12/01/114 78.62 0.00 78.62 7107039 12/20/04 96.50 0.00 96.50 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work tlyder# ActCd Description '.CS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park .Jan 26, 20L15 09:31am Page 14 Payment History. Bank AP Payment bates 10/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #rs 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check 121 -67 -5210 392.64 MISC SUPPLIES PO Liquidation Amount 121 -67 -5210 392.64 Claim# General Description 65238 MISC SUPPLIES PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Inuc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11792 O 9162617 11/08/i% 35.98 0.00 35.98 6021014 12/01/04 80.80 0.00 80.80 4021149 12/03/04 81.10 0.00 81.10 0019948 12/07/04 81.39 0.00 81.39 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 114 -61 -5210 -094 279.27 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004/05* LUMBER AND MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES PO Liquidation Amount 114 -61- 5210 -094 279.27 Claim# General Description 65367 RISC SUPPLIES PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11591 O 7282787 11/30/04 163.72 0.00 163.72 3021241 12/04/04 60.51 0.00 60.51 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 121 -65 -5210 0.00 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004/05* LUMBER AND HARDWARE SUPPLIES, TREES PORTION 121 -66 -5210 0.00 1 EA IRRIGATION PORTION 121 -67 -5210 0.00 1 EA COURT REFERRAL PORTION 121 -68 -5210 0.00 1 EA LANDSCAPE PORTION 117 -69- 5210 -052 224.23 1 EA TRANSIT FACILITY MAINTENANCE PORTION PO Liquidation Amount 117 -69 -5210 -052 224.23 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 4528 HONEY14ELL SECURITY MONITORING AP 148403* 01/12/05 20,912.75 ;laim# General Description 65232 MAINT 01/01/05 - 03/31/05 Pty# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11755 O 3104541 12/02/04 20,912.75 0.00 20,912.75 GL Distribution Gross Amount Mork Order# ActCd Description 100 -57 -5000 -156 20,912.75 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004/05* MAINTENANCE CONTRAT FOR HVAC SYSTEM, CITY HALL 100 -57- 5000 =211 0.00 1 EA TEEN CENTER PO Liquidation Amount ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 100 -57 -5000 -156 20,912.75. -CS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) ,ity of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2005 09:31am Page 15 Dayment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check/ACH#'5 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 452 HOSE-MAN INC AP 148404 01/12/05 29.43 "lain# General Description 65239 MISI, SUPPLIES PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Inve Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11642 0 2104370-0001-02 11/151104 29.43 0.00 29.43 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 130-58-5270 29.43 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2004/05* EMERGENCY HYDRAULIC HOSE REPAIR PO Liquidation Amount 130-58-5270 29.43 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee 346 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING RIGHTS 'laim# General Description 6.52LO NOV SERVICES RVICES I PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 122,35 0 0 GL Distribution 120-43-5050-160 PO Liquidation 120-43-5050-160 '!aim# General Description 65241 JULY-OCT SERVICES Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 148405 01/12/05 5,910.00 Inve Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 01/111,05 1,168.00 0.00 1,168.00 Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 1,168.00 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2004/'05* FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL Amount 1,168.0► PO4 Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12235 0 0 01/11/05 4,742.00 0.00 4,742.00 GL Distribution I Gross Amount Work Opdep# ActCd Description 120-43-5050-160 4,742.00 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2004/05* FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL PO Liquidation Amount 120-43-5050-160 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4,742.00 ---------- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 5568 HUR HARDWOOD FLOORING CO. AP 148406 01/12/05 1,980.00 '.laim# General Description 65242 MISC REPAIR-3 PO4 Stat Conthract# Invoice# Inyc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11720 0 2168 12/10/04 1,980.00 0.00 1,980.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Opderg ActCd Description 1,980.00 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2004/05* SERVICE OF THE COMMUNITY CENTER GYM FLOOR PO Liquidation Amount 127-57-5000 1,980.00 _-CS.A-P Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2005 09.31am Page 16 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/01'0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #'s 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount 'Sep 5751 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES AP 148407 01/12/05 299.54 Claim# General Description 65243 RENT iMAGRNR 9/15/04- 10/14/04 P0# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11973 U 63957686 11/19/04 164.44 0.00 164.44 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 131 -14- 5760 -062 0.00 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2004 /05* CANON IR1600 COPIER LEASE PAYMENTS, SERIAL #fiQS02343 E841S, CITY YARD 131 -14- 5260 -060 164.44 1 EA MAINTENANCE PORTION PO Liquidation Amount 131 -14- 5260 -060 164.44 ;lain# General Description 65244 RENT -PAPER CUTTER 12/15/04 - 01/14/05 P0# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11974 0 63957689 11/19/04 135.10 0.00 135.10 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 131-14- 5760 -060 135.10 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004J05* PAPER CUTTER LEASE -TO -OWN PAYMENTS, ACCOUNT #1060927 - 876289 Pit Liquidation Amount 131- 14-5760 -060 135.10 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check, Amount Sep 1179 INLAND EMPIRE STAGES, LTD. AP 148408 01x12/05 951.00 ;Iaim# General Description 65245 TRANSPORTATION SR TRIP PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11662 0 16150 11/09/04 441.00 0.00 441.00 16450 12/08/04 510.00 0.00 510.000 GL Distribution dross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 117 -55- 5000 -055 951.00 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004/05* PROVIDE TRANSPORTATION FOR SENIOR CITIZEN TRIPS PO Liquidation Amount 117 -55- 5000 -055 951.00 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Ci-eck# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7.307 IRON MOUNTAIN AP 148409 01/12./05 80.00 w "Iaim# General Description 65246 MONTHLY SRV FEE AJC# 07215 K14 Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount AH35681 11/30/04 80.00 0.00 80.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 100 -03 -5000 80.00 MONTHLY SERV FEE ,CS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) 'City of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2335 09.31am Page 17 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99Y9999 Check/ACH#'s 148369 to 1�8626 Payment Type Check Vend# Vendor Name Remit#Payee Amount Bank Check# Ohk Date Check Amount Sep 1584 IRV[N S 0AWS0M 60.72 108621 AP 148410 01/12/05 2'528.00 Claim# General Description GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Ovdev# ActCd Description 65354 DEC CONSULTING SRV 815.65 1EA* ENGINE OIL AND LUBRICANTS PV Liquidation PO# "tat Contract# Iovoice# lnvc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 815.65 11577 V U 01/12Y05 2.520.00 0.00 2,520.00 @- Distribution Gross Amount Work Vrder# ActCd Description 100-26-5000 2.520.08 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2004/85* EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS CONSULTING FEES P0 Liquidation Amount _--_--__-_------_—_—_____-_____--__-__--_-____-__---_-_-_-_--_____--_-_-____-_-_--__---_-__----__ 100-26r5000 2.520.00 Vpnd# Vendor Name Remit# Payee � Bank eck# Chk Date Check, Amount � 643 }SABEL MVlSES AP 148411 81/12/05 75.00 Cloim# General Description 66247 TRANSLATION SRV 12/23/04 PO4 Stat Cvntract% lovoice# lnvc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 1102 O 0 12/23/04 75.00 0.00 75.00 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rdeA ActCd Description 1��1��0 10.88 1��N�&fY2�4/85*��S�lVM��IQBRENDERED FOR BALDWlN PARK NOW NEWSPAPER, GENERAL FUND PORTION ��-81-5000-01� 10.68 1 EA HOUSING CLEARING PORTION 103-81-5000 10.68 1 EA AB 1693 PORTION 109-81-500 10.69 1 EA AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PORTION 117-81-50O0 1 EA PROPOSITION ^A^ PORTION 118-81-5000 10,69 1 EA PROPOSITION "C" PORTION 1210-81-5000-030 10.69 1 EA C08G PORTION P0 Liquidation Amount 10-81-5000 1O.88 102-81-500O_014 10,68 103-81-5000 -10.68 109-81-5000 10.69 117-81-5008 10.69 118-81-5000 10.67 120-81-500-030 10.69 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep hJT J H MITCHELL & SONS AP 14841 01/12/05 815.65 C]aio# General Description ' 65249 MISC MATERIALS PO4 Stat Contoact4 Immice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 1164 0 1.08207 11/1-S/04 60.72 0.00 60.72 108621 12/004 754.93 0.00 754.0 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Ovdev# ActCd Description 130-58-5210 815.65 1EA* ENGINE OIL AND LUBRICANTS PV Liquidation Amount 130-58-5218 815.65 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release b.1.JN*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2CL15 09.:31am Page 18 Payment Histrmy. Bank AP Payment Gates 00 /00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #'s 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Gate Check Amount Sep 2544 JC'S PLUMBING & BACKFLOW SVC AP 148413 01/12/05 241.90 Claim# General Description 65248 MISC PLUMBING REPAIRS PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gro55 Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11943 O 5430 1'2/07/04 49.74 0.00 49.74 54:37 12/07/04 150,16 0.00 150.16 5438 12YO7/04 Q.FIJ 0.00 42.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 103 -57 -5000 42.00 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY200 /05* PLUMBING SERVICE FARTS, GENERAL FUND PtRTION 127 -57 -5000 199.90 1 EA PARKS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PORTION PO Liquidation Amount 100- 57 -50i �0 Q.00 127 -57 -5000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 199.90 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk mate Check Amount Sep 996 Jt HNS I ONE SUPPLY AP 148414 01/12/05 62.44 Claim# General Description 65250 MISC ' UPPLIES PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 636650 12/01/04 62,44 0.00 62.44 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -57 -5210 31,22 SUPPLIES 127 -57 -5210 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 31.22 SUPPLIES Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 1682 KANE, BALLMER & BERKMAN AP 148415 01/12/05 19,889.67 Maim# General Description 65252 NOV -LEGAL SERVICES PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 1104 -275 11/30/04 19,889.67 0.00 19,889.67 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -i �4 -5010 15,549.67 NOV EFERV 120-43-5010 -O30 945.00 NOV SERV 150 -00 -2163 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 3,395.00 NOV ':ERVf Vend# Vender Name Remit# Payee Bank C }-neck# Chk Date C }-peck Amount Sep 4669 KING BOLT COMPANY AP 148416 01/12/05 67.99 laim# General Description 65254 MISC MATERIALS PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11726 O 41223 11/18/04 67.99 0.00 67.99 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100-57 -5210 67.99 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004/05* MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES PO Liquidation Amount ;'CS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) Ci�of�ld�n�� Jan 26, �/�� �� � 3ayment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/000 to 99/99/9999 Chcck/ACHV5148369 to 14806 Payment Type Check "CS-AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) 100+57-52,10 67.99 Ve»���o Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 1O87 LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPART AP 148417 0/12/05 1,869.28 Claim# General Description 65255 OCTOBER SERVICES PO# Stat Contxact# }mmice# Imc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11579 O 72422 12/07/04 1.869.28 0.00 1.869.28 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work Opdcr# ActCd 0escniption 100-25-5008 1,869,28 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2D84/O5* ARRESTB PROCESSING FEES FOR INMATE HOUSING P0 Liquidation Amount _________________________________________________________________________________________________ 10F25-5000 1,869.28 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 583 LOS ANGELES COUNTY ASSESSOR AP 148418 01/12/05 21,29 Claim# General Description 65282 MAPS/POSTAGE P{# Stat Contoact# Invoice# lnvc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11898 V 30�64 12/10/04 21,29 0.00 21.29 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0ndev# ActCd Description 121-56-5000 21.29 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY"1004/05* UPDATED MAPS P0 Liquidation Amount 121-56-50010 210 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 543 LAGUNA DAY CO. AP 148419 01/12/05 424.84 Claim# General Description 65257 NISC SUPPLIES PO# Stat Contpert# }mmice# {nve Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11866 C 54434 12/16/04 42�.84 0.00 42 84 6L 0i5tribution Gross Amount Work 0ndez# ActCd Description 100-72-5218 424.84 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2004/05* CERAMIC SUPPLIES FOR THE COMMUNITY CENTER CERAMICS PROGRAMS PO Liquidation Amount ----___-_-__-_-__---__---_-___-____-___-___-___--_-----_---_-____________--______--_-_______ 10+712-5210 500.88 Vend8 Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 388 LAND AMERICA GATEWAY TITLE AP 148420 01/12Y05 140.80 Claim# General Description 65251 TITLE REPORTS PO# Stat Confract# Invvice# lnvc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 08157526 12/01'04 70.00 0.00 70.00 00157546 12/02/04 70.00 0.00 78,08 6L Distribution 6mas Amount Work Vnder# ActCd Description 120-43-507Jg-030 140.00 TITLE REPORTS "CS-AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2005 09:31am Page 20 Payment Histony. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0080 to 99/99/9999 Check/ACHUs 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check Vend4 Vendor Name 3295 LAWl INDUSTRIES 2ajm4 General Description 65258MlSC SUPPLIES PO#StatComtraot# Immice# 6L Distribution 100-72-5210 Vend# Vendor Name 2392 LAWN MOWER CORNER Claim# General Description 65256 PARTS/LABOR PO# Stat &mtnact# Invvice# 11693 O 51534 @- Distribution 114-61-5210-094 P0 Liquidation 114-61-5210-09+ ------------------------------- Vend# Vendor Name 558 LEAGUE OF CA. CITlES. Claim8 General Description 65259 ANNUAL DUES '05 PO# Stat Contract# Invoiceg 2-545 GL Distribution 100-81-524U -------------------------------------- Vznd# Vendor Name VbO LEWIS ENGRAVING Claim# General Description 65260 NAME BADGE PO4 Stut Contract# Invoice# 01452 6L Distribution &emit#Payee BankCheck8 Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP lq421 01/12/05 8.65 ` Imm 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12/82/04 8.65 0.00 8.65 Gross Amount Work 0rden4 ActCd Description 8.65 SUPPLIES Remit# Payee BanhCheck# Ohk Date Check Amount Sep AP 148422 01/12/05 100.76 lmn 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 10/07104 100.76 0.00 100.76 Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description ' 10036 1 E REPAIR 0F POWER TOOLS Amount 100.76 ---____-___-_____--__--_--_-_-_-_____-_-_--____---_-_____-----_-__ Remit# Payee . Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 148423 01/12/05 17,964.80 {me 0t Gross Amount Discount Amit Discount Used Net Amount 12/13/84 17.964.00 0.00 17,964.00 Gross Amount Work 0nden# ActCd0eacripti*n 17.96A.00 '05 DUES &emit# Payee Bank Check# Chk0ate Check Amount Sep AP 148424 01112-'10.5 48.17 lmr 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used 12/020 �8.17 0.00 Gross Amount Work Orderg ActCd Description q. 17 NAME BADGES Net Amount 48.11"?, CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR78U By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 0.2005 09.31am Page 21 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/000 to 99/99/9999Check/ACH'5 1069 to lq626 Payment Type Check Vend# Vendor Name Remit#Paye 1975 LIGHTNING OIL CO., INC. & VACUUM S Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 148425 01/12/05 160.00 Ooim# General Description 65261 HAZ WASTE DISPOSAL FEE ` PO# Stat Comtoact# Imnice# lmz 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11900 8 38464 12/02/04 168.00 U.00 160.00 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rden# ActCd Description 107-52-5210-047 160.00 1 EA *AN1NUALfY2004/05* HAULING AND PROPER DISPOSAL OF USED MOTOR 0}L P0 Liquidation Amount 10-52-5210-6147 160.00 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ Vend# Vendor Name Remit& Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 615 MARTlN & CHAPMAN AP 148426 01112105 2.733.91 Claim# General Description 65264 MAILING OF NOTICE OF ELECTION DAY POST CARDS PO# Stat Contnact# Invoice4 Tnvc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 24898 11/16/04 2.7371.91 0.00 2.733.91 6L 0i atrihution 6nms Amount Work 0nder# ActCd Description '----_-__-__-__-___----_-__-_____-_-_______---_____--__-----___--__---_--__-__--__--___--__-____ 100-03-5000 2,733.91 NOTICE OF ELECTION DATE POST CARDS Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 064 MASTER SOLUTION INC AP 148427 01112105 1.439.73 ClaimS General Description 65265 VISION FOR WINDOWS NODE LICENCE PO# Stat Contract# Imwice# Imm Df 6nvaa Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12162 C 5750 11/30/04 1'439.73 0.80 1,439.73 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 131-13-5724-145 1.�39.73 19 EA VISION FOR WIN 85X NODE LICENSE (TECH CENTER � COMMUNITY CENTER) PO Liquidation Amount 131-13-5724-145 1,330.00 Vend# Vendor Name - - -- ---------------------------.--------------------------------------------------------- Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 1238 MCI AP 148428 01/12/05 696.00 Claim# General Description 65263 SRV PO# Stat Comtrectk lmwice4 lmc Dt Gross Amount Di scvunt Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12173 V 2244124 12/01/04 596.00 0.80 596.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0»den# Ac{-Cd Description 131-14-5430-064 596.00 1 EA *ANNUALfY2004/05* DATA T-1 CONNECTION FOR CITY'S INTERNET ACCESS ($600/MONTH FOR T MONTHS) P8 Liquidation Amount 131-14-5430-064 596.00 ZS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 11005 09:31am Page 22, Ilayment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check/ACH#' a 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk0ate Check Amount Sep 7585 MID VALLEY RECOVERY SERVlCBINC AP 1�BQ9 U1/12105 1,368.76 'laimg General Description 65266 JULY-NOV SERVICES Vend# Vendor Name Rein it# Payee BankCheck# Chk, Date Check Amount Sep 3871 MOTOROLA C0MNUN CATIONS & ELECTRON AP 148432 0/12/O5 �0.0O Claix# General Description 65269 RADIO REPAIRS PO# Stat Cvntnari# Immice# P14 Stat Contaart% Immice# Invc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount @- Distribution 12233 V U 01/11/05 1.368.70 300.00 0.00 1.368.76 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description By SANDRA A (SANDRA) 12043-5050-183 1,368.76 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2804/05* SUBSTANCE ABUSE RECOVERY AND C0UNCELIMG P0 Liquidation Amount 120-43-5050-183 1.368.76 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Cl* Date Check Amount Sep 7399 MID-CITIES HONDA/ KAWASAKl/SEA-00 ` AP 148430 01/12/05 612.64 Claim# General Description 65267 HISC PARTS/LABOR P0# Stat Contnact# Imwioe# lnvc 0t 6msa Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11835 V 93650763 11/10/04 449.31 0 .013 449.J1 0651746 11/1��� 163.33 0.00 163.33 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work VrderK AcfCd Description 130-58-5270 612.64 1 EA *ANNUALfY2004/85* POLICE DEPARTMENT MOTORCYCLE PARTS & REPAIRS P0 Liquidation Amount i330-58-527O 612.64 _---_-__-___---_----__-------__________-_____--______-__--_-__________-___----_-__-_--__-____-___ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 633 JOSE M}6UEL NER[Y 08A; MIKE'S A00 AP 148431 01/1205 524.02 C}aimK General Description 652 A 68 MIS REPAIRS P0# Stat Contnaot# Invoice# Invc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12004 C 1038 11/08/84 369.90 0.08 364,90 1058 11/29/04 154.12 0.08 154.12 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 1��58-527O 524.02 1 EA *AMNUAL-FY20041105* UPHOLSTERY REPAIRS P0 Liquidation Amount 1130-58-51170 522.21 Vend# Vendor Name Rein it# Payee BankCheck# Chk, Date Check Amount Sep 3871 MOTOROLA C0MNUN CATIONS & ELECTRON AP 148432 0/12/O5 �0.0O Claix# General Description 65269 RADIO REPAIRS PO# Stat Cvntnari# Immice# ler 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12035 V W0782762 12/004 J00,08 0.00 3100.00 @- Distribution Gross Amount Work Vnden# ActCd Description 1�-58-521 300.00 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY�N4/O5* EX�N WORK OR PARTS NOT COVERED BY GENERAL MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR 2-WAY RA0I0 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2005 09:31am Page 23 Dayment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 ChL-ck/ACH#'s 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check COMMUNICATION SYSTEM AT CITY YARD PO Liquidation Amount 130-58-5210 300.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Vend# Vendor, Name Remit# Payee 3871 MOTOROLA COMMUNICATIONS & ELECTRON "laim# General Description 65270 SRV 01/01/05-03/31/05 Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 148433 01112105 1,770.33 Y PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11647 0 S0781177 12/03/04 1,770.33 0.00 1,770.33 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 0.00 317.50 130-58-5210 1,770.33 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2004/05* SERVICE AGREEMENT #615002104 Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd FOR TWO-WAY RADIO SYSTEM @ CITY YARD PO Liquidation Amount 317.50 130-58-5210 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1,770.333 Vendor Name Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 6739 MUSEUM OF TOLERANCE AP 1484714 01/11/175 317.50 -'Iaim# General Description 65271 FIELD TRIP-BOOT CAMP 12/19/04 ---------------------------------------------------- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee 5.286 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS "laim# General Description 65273 EOC PH SRV Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 148436 01/12/05 58.64 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# InVC Dt G1`055 Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 932287317-036 12/08/04 58.64 0.00 58.64 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 131-14-5430-064 58.64 EOC SIERV ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _'CS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) PO# Stat Contrlact4 Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 11/23/0 317.50 0.00 317.50 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 120-23-5050-083 317.50 BOOT CAMP FIELD TRIP 12/19/0+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 71960 NEOPOST LEASING A, AP 148435 01/12/05 688.57 -laim# General Description 65272 LEASE MAILPRO 12/31/04-01/30/05 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 115+9 0 3677436 12/02/04 688.57 0.00 688.57 GL Disty-ibution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 131-14-5760-061 688.57 T 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2004/05* MAIL PRO 7-140/2 POSTAGE MACHINE MUNICIPAL LEASE PROGRAM PAYMENTS, LEASE #02101898 PO Liquidation Amount 131-14-5760-061 688.57 ---------------------------------------------------- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee 5.286 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS "laim# General Description 65273 EOC PH SRV Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 148436 01/12/05 58.64 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# InVC Dt G1`055 Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 932287317-036 12/08/04 58.64 0.00 58.64 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 131-14-5430-064 58.64 EOC SIERV ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _'CS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 005 09:31am Page 24 Payment His��.��� ���t�t�U��/�������� �e��C�'a������� ���t����k Vend# Vendor Name 683 NlCHOLS LUMBER & HARDWARE Claim# General Description 65274 MISC SUPPLIES PO#StatComtmct%lmmice# 1i733 V 385356 Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12/01/04 385724 8.00 57.82 12/01/04 386830 0.00 19.27 12/02/04 387093 0.80 387480 12/03/04 387708 0.00 387794 12/06/04 38818� 0.00 '188213 12/06/04 388820 0.00 388876 12/07/04 389178 0.00 389604 12/138/04 389968 8.00 390328 12/08/04 390799 0.08 390819 6L Distribution 74.92 100-57-5008 . 127-57-5000 46.59 Claim# General Description 65275 SUPPLIES Remit# Payee BankOeck# Qhk Date Check Amount Sep AP 1�8437 01/12/C15 1,645.-J6 Imc 0t 6noaa Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12/01/04 57.82 8.00 57.82 12/01/04 19.27 0.00 19.27 12/02/04 42,3b 0.80 42.36 12/03/04 29.37 0.00 29.37 12/06/04 98.15 0.00 98.15 ' 12/06/04 31.93 0.00 31.93 12/07/04 18.71 0.00 18.71 12/138/04 56.67 8.00 56.67 12/08/04 37.0 0.08 37.0 12/09/04 74.92 0.00 74.92 12/10/0� 46.59 0.80 46.59 12/10/04 9.71 0.00 9.71 12/13/04 32.65 0.00 32.65 12/13/04 45.39 0.80 45.39 12114/04 34,34 0.00 34,3� 12/15/84 15.12 0.00 15.12 12/16/04 14.85 0,00 14.05 12/17/04 4,63 0.80 4.63 12/20/04 43.70 0.00 43.70 12/28/04 37X8 0.00 37.08 Gross Amount Work 0nder# ActCd Description 750.08 1 EA *ANNUALfY200'r/05* FACILITY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES, ' GENERAL FUND PORTION 0.80 ` 1 EA PARKS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PORTl0N ' RO# StatCmtract#lnvoice# Imc 0t Invc0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11734 0 39081 12/20/04 10,18 0.00 10.18 J9150 1��2/O4 14�^19 0.00 146.19 Amount J91618 12/22/04 45.35 0.00 45.35 6L Distribution %S.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 Gross Amount Work 0nden# #ctCd Description 100-57-3210-211 201.72 1 EA *ANNUALfY2004/05* FACILITY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES AT TEEN CENTER FACILITY P0 Liquidation Amount 10-E7-52IO+211 201.72 'laim# General Description 65276 SUPPLIES PO# Stat Dmtraot# lmmice# Imc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11588 0 385000 11/30/04 53,98 0.00 53.98 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work Orden ActCd Description 114-64-5210-094 53.98 1 E STAINS AND PREMIUM 00 PAINTS P0 Liquidation Amount 114-64-5210-094 53.98 %S.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 0, 2005 09:31am Page 25 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00008 to 99/99/9999 Check/ACHVs 148369 to 1�806 Payment Type Check Claim# General Description 65277 SUPPLIES PO# Sfat Cootract8 }nwdce# Invc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11791 0 385988 12/02/04 �16.31 0.00 416.31 0.00 J�2� �NB� 9.98 8.� Y.� 6L Distribution 11/15/04 Gross Amount Work 0rder# ActCd Description 22.72 114-61-5210-094 6.75 426.29 1 EA *AHMUAL-FY2004/05* SMALL TOOLS AND MISCELLANEOUS 7.11 0.00 7.11 RARDWARE AND SUPPLIES 11.81 PO Liquidation 11.81 Amount 41.10 0.08 11461-5210-09 12y18/0� 426.29 0.O0 7.57 Claiw# General Description 65278 SUPPLIES PO#Stat ComtractnImmiceg 11689 0 38451 387866 6L Distribution PV Liquidation Claim� General Description 65279 SUPPLIES PO# Stat Contract# Immice# 11661 V 386055 388419 6L Distribution 100-72-5210 150-1-10-2154 PO Liquidation Cbim% General Description 65280 MISC SUPPLIES POS Stat Contract4 lmmice# 11887 0 374652 381108 ,-3,81132 ]82187 384814 385866 388114 388307 Invr 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11/29/04 8.93 0.80 8.93 12/06/04 11.45 0.08 11.45 12/09/04 11.91 0.U0 11.91 Gross Amount Work Vrder# ActCd Description 32.29 1 EA *ANNUALfYJ-1N4/05* SMALL TOOLS AND MISCELLANEOUS HARDWARE &SUPPLIES Amount 32.29 lnmDt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12/02/0� 12.95 8.00 12.95 12/1804 16.45 8,013 '16.45 Gross Amount Work 0»derK ActCd Description 29.4-0 1 EA *ANNUALfY2004/05* SUPPLIES FOR RECREATION & ADULT/YOUTH SPORTS PROGRAMS, GENERAL FUND PORTION 0,00 1 EA TRUST DEPOSIT PORTION Amount 2Y.1T0 Imo 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 10/25/04 26.15 0.00 26.15 10/26/04 14,80 0.00 14.80 11/1504 13.59 0.00 13.59 11/15/04 22.72 0.00 22.72 11/18/04 6.75 0.08 6.75 11/29/04 7.11 0.00 7.11 12/02/04 11.81 0.00 11.81 12/10/04 41.10 0.08 41.10 12y18/0� 7.57 0.O0 7.57 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order#AchCd Description 130-58-521 1-51.60 i EA MATERIALS & SMALL TOOLS PO Liquidation Amount �CS.APAccounts Payable Release 6.i.JH*APR7U ' 8y SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26, "2005 09:31am Page 26 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check/ACH#'s 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check 130-58-5210 151.60 Vend# Vendor, Name Remit# Payee 686 NORM & BOBS TIRES Claim# General Description 65282 TIRE REPAIRS PO# 3-tat Contract# invoice# 11650 0 43879 43880 43889 43890 43903 43911 GL Distribution 1730-58-5270 PO Liquidation 130-58-5270 Bank. Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 148440* 01/12/05 1,002.26 Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11/19/04 86.013 0.00 86.110 11/19/04 150.00 0.00 150.00 11/30/04 120.66 0.00 120.66 11/30/04 45.00 0.00 45.00 121/03/04 330.80 0.00 330.80 12/06/04 269.80 0.00 269.80 Gross Amount Work Ordep# ActCd Description 1,002.26 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2004/ !OC J * TRUCK RUCK TIRE REPAIR & ALIGNMENT Amount 1,002-26 --- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee 4078 NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT CO. '-!aim# General Description 65281 CANVAS TARP Bank Check# Chk Date Check, Amount Sep **VOID** AP 148441 01/12/05 673.74 PO# Stat Contract4 Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12223 C 11112703 01/02/05 673.74 0.00 673.74 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 127-57-5210 673.74 5 EA 39503-21503 16'X24' CANVAS TARP PO Liquidation Amount 127-57-5210 948.74 ---------------------------------------------------- Vend# 'Vendor Name Remit# Payee 4107 OFFICE DEPOT, INC. --laim# General Description 65366 MISC SUPPLIES Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 148442 01/12/05 61.94 PU# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 265547874-001 11/22/04 61.94 0.00 61.94 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 150-00-2187 47.66 SUPPLIES 100-23-5210 14.28 SUPPLIES ---------------------------------------------------- Vendg Vendor Name Remit# Payee 7622 PANDA EXPRESS INC. ATTN: DAVID WAN Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 14843 01111121105 6,170.00 ­I a i, m# General Description 65283 REFUND SECURITY DEPOSIT C&D PROGRAM PO# Stat Contract4 Invoice# Inve Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used 0 01/11/05 6,170.00 0.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Orderg ActCd Description 129-00-2075 6,170.00 REFUND C&D PPG "CS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 Net Amount 6,170.00 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) "'ityvf Baldwin Park Jan 26.2005 09:31am Page 28 DaymenfHiatory, Bank AP Payment Dates 00/0008111 h99/99/999 Check/ACHUs148369 to I't8626 Payment Type Check Vendg Vendor Name Remit#Payc Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP It8444 01/12/05 730,00 �aim# General Description 65555 REGIST-6l14A KNIGHT MICHELLE ALVES 02Y07/05-82/09/05 PO# Stat Dmtract# Immice# lmm Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount U 01/12/05 730.00 0.80 7,70.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rderg ActCd Description 132-16-3330 730.00 G KNl6HT/M ALVES 2/7-9/05 Vend# Vendor, Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# OhkDate Check Amount Sep 86PATTON SALES CORP (A RROW PIPE &ST AP 14844 0/12/05 258.81 Claim# General Description 65284 MILSC SUPPLIES PO# Stat Dmbact# Immice# lmm 0f Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11839 V 98094 12/02/04 90.28 0.00 90.28 990534 -12Y09/04 151.23 0.00 151.23 993920 12/16 ' 84 17.30 0.00 17.30 6L Distri6u{ion 6rv55 Amount Work 0nderg ActCd Description` 130-58-5210 258.81 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2004/05* STEEL T0 REPAIR EQUIPMENT PV Liquidation Amount 130-58-5210 258.81 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# 8k Date Check Amount Sep 864 PERS-RETIPEMENT AP 148446 01/12/05 129.50 -luim8 General Description 65290 COUNCIL RETIREMENT JAN '05-PP#01 PO4 Stat Ombaotk }mmice# Imm 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount O 01/12/05 129.50 0.00 129.50 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rder# ActCd Description 100-00-2205 115.50 COUNCIL RETIREMENT JAN '05 1100-00-2223 14 .00 COUNCIL RETIREMENT JAN '05 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ Vendg Vendor Name kemitS Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 864 PERS-RETIREMENT AP 1�8447 01/12105 798.81 Y Jaim¢ 6ener 1 Description R4 Stat Omtraotk lnvo ce# Inm Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount O 01/12/105 798,81 O.00 798.81 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rder# ActCd Description 180-00-22L6 286.63 RETR0 PMTS PP901 01/01/05 PER/ 01/05/3 100-0I-2305 __________________________________________________________________________________________ 512.18 RE7R8 PMTS PP%01 01/01/05 PER: 01/05/03 'CS-AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) 'ity of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2005 09:31am Page 29 'ayment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 ChEck/ACH#'s 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check Vendg Vendor Name Remit#Paye 864 PERS-RETIREMENT 'laim# General Description 65292 RETIREMENT PP#01 P/E: 81/01/05 SVC PER: 01-05-3 Bank Check# Chk, Date Check Amount Sep AP 14848 01/12/05 130,360.68 Y PO4 S+at Contnaci4 Immice# {mm Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount U 01/12/03 130.360.68 0.00 130.1160.68 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work VndennActCd Description 100-00-2205 4G,571.84 PP901 P/E: 01/01A0 SVC PER: 01-05- 100F00-2223 182.28 PF#01 P/E: 01/01/05 SVC PER: 01-85-3 180-0-2305 81,606.56 PPtO1 P/E: 81-/01/05 SVC PER: 01-05-3 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Vend% Vendor Name Remit% Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 864 P[RS-RETIREMENT AP 148449 01/12/05 21873.39 Y 2aim# General Description 65293 RETIREMENT PP124 P/E: 11-20-04 SVC PER; 11-04-4 . P0# Sfat Contoact# Invnice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount Q 81/12/05 2.873.39 0.00 2'873.39 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order#ActCd Description 100-0-2205 2.591.20 P/T PERS PP#24 P/E; 11-20-04 10-0+2223 91.14 P/T PP#24 P/E: 11-21+04 100+0-2305 191.05 P/7 PPK4 P/E: 11-201-04 _-_-----___-_____-__---_____--_-_____-__-_____-______---__-__---_____--_-__-____--__---_-_____ Vend0 Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank CheckK 0k Date Check Amount Sep 884 PERS-RETIREMENT AP 148458 01/12/05 2.828.75 Y 'laim# General Description 65294 P/T PP#26 P/E: 12-18-04 SVC PER; 12-044 PU# Stat ContnactA lnvoice# Invc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 2,828.75 U 81/12/85 2,�.75 0.00 2,828.75 @- Distribution Gross Amount Work 0nden# ActCd Description 100f0-2205 2.737.61 P/7 PP#26 P/E: 12-18-0� SRV 12-04-4 10-00-2223 91.14 P/T PP#26 P/E: i2-18-84 SRY 12-04-4 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 864 PERS-RETIREMENT AP 148451 01/12/05 2,503.10 Y ."laix.# General Description 65295 PART TIME RETIREMENT PP425 P/I: 12-04-04 SRV PER: 12-04-3 PO# Stat Comtant# [mmice# Invc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount D 0/12/05 2,503.10 0.00 2.503.10 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0v6er# ActCd Description 100+00-2205 2,411.03 PF425 P/E: 12-04-04 SRV 12-04-3 100-00-2223 92,07 PP#25 P/E: 12-%-4 SRV 12-04-3 �.AP Accounts Payable Release b.1.3 N*APRT8O 8 � y SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park .Jan 26, 20015 09n31am Page 30 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00 /00 /€000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #`s 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Pate Check Amount Sep 864 PER'S RETIREMENT AP 148452 01/12/05 :3,157.76 Y Claim# General Description 65296 P/T PP 423 P /E: 11 -06 -04 SVC PER: 11 -04 -3 POI Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 0111211,35 3,157.76 0.00 3,157.76 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -00 -2205 3,016.13 PPt23 11 -06 -04 11-04-7) 100 -00 -2223 98.58 PP #23 11 -06 -04 SVC: 11 -04 -3 100 -00 -2305 43.05 PP#23 11 -06 -N SVC. 11 -04 -3 ---- - - - - -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 864 PER'S- RETIREMENT AP 148453 01/121/05 1,47736 Y Claim# General Description 65297 PERS BUY BACK PRG PP 421 -22 RAMIREZ, KOLBACH, HART PO4 ':,tat Contract# Invoice# Inve Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Miscount Used Net Amount 0 €11/12/05 1,477.36 0.00 1,477.36 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 10 €1 -00 -2205 1,477.36 BUY BACK #21 -22 RAMIREZ,KOLBACH,HART Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount 'Sep 864 PERS - RETIREMENT AP 148454 01/12/€15 831.07 Y Maim# General Description 65298 PER BUY BACK PRII PP #Oi RAMIREZ, KOLBACK, HART # DELGADO PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/12,105 831.07 0.00 831.07 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100- 010 -2205 831.07 BUY BK t 01 RAMIREZ,KOLBACH,HART,DELGADO -------------------------------------------------------------_----------------------------------------------------------------------- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount `_yep 724 PERVO PAINT COMPANY AP 148455 €11/1:2/05 514.19 Claim# General Description 65_53 TRAFFIC PAINT Pty# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11795 O 30098 12/07/04 514.19 0.00 514.19 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 114 -59- 5210 -094 514.19 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY20% /05* TRAFFIC PAINTS PO Liquidation Amount 114 -59- 5210 -094 514.19 CC' .AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR.700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2005 09-31am Page 31 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check ACH#'s 1�8369 to 148626 Payment Type Check Vend#Vendor Name Remit# Payee BankCheck# Ohk0ate Check Amount Sep 7456 PHOTOGRAPHY BY DON AP 148456 01/12/05 211.09 ClaimK General Description 65285 COUNCIL PORTRAIT PU# Stat &mbact4 lmmice# {mr 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 4770 12/121'04 1173.2U 0.08 173.20 4770 12Y12/04 37.89 0.00 37.84 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rder# ActCd Description 100-01-52113-102 211.89 COUNCIL PORTRAIT __-______--_____-________-____--__---_--_--___-___--__—__---___-_--_____-__-_-__-___--____ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check,# ChV Date Check Amount Sep 728 SECURlTAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, I AP 148457 01/12/05 1,730.02 Claim# General Description 65315 SECURITY METROL{NK STA 12/03/04-12/16/04 P08 Stat Contract4 Invvice# lnvc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Het Amount 11776 0 W0375925 12/17/04 1.730.02 0.00 1J30.02 6L Distribution ' Gross Amount Work 0nden# ActCd Description 117-55-5OU0-1353 1,730.02 12Y01/04-12/16/0� PV Liquidation Amount 117-55-500-053 1,730.82 ______-_______-----_-_-_-_--_---_-_-____-----___---_-----_-_--__--~____-_-___-____-__--__-_-----_---___ Vend# Vendor Name Remitt Payee Bank Cherk# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 5459 PLATINUM PLUS FOR BUSINESS AP 148458 01/12/05 06,26 Claim# 6cncru) Description 65286 DECEMBER STATEMENT PO4 St8t Contract# Invoice# lnvr,0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount O 12/U6/04 786.26 0.00 786.26 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rdzn# ActCd Description iOO-23-57330 786,26 DEC-MARK KL{N6 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bonk Check# Chk Date Check Amount ' p 7587 PROJECT SISTER AP 1�8459 01/12/05 1,865.57 ` Claim# General Description 65287 SERY JLY-SEPT 110# Stat Contpact# Immice# Imc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12234 O 0 01/11/05 1.865.57 0.00 1,865.57 Q- Distribution Gross Amount Wowk 0pden% ActCd Description 120-43-5050-182 1.865.57 1 EA *ANNUALfY2004/05* INTERVENTION PROGRAM FOR VICTIMS OF RAPE OR SEXUAL ASSUALT P0 Liquidation Amount 120-43-5050-182 1.E65.57 DCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3N*APR00 By SANDRA A(SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2CIL15 09.31am Page 32 Payment History. Bank AP Payment [sates 00 /00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #'s 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check Mend# Vendor Game Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount '.yep :226 PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRIS AP 148460 01/12105 4,959.03 Claim# General Description 65288 SRV _!LY -OCT PO# 'tat Contract Invoice# lnvc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12229 O 0 01/11/05 4,959.03 0.00 4,959;03 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 120 -43-5050 -159 4,959.03 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY23'004 /05* OUTREACH, PREVENTION AND EDUCATION ON RELATIONSHIP VIOLENCE PO Liquidation Amount 12043-5050-159 4,959.03 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank C }-peck# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 731.1 PURSUIT 1 ORANGE COMMERICAL CREDIT AP 148461 01/12/05 715.35 Claim# General Description 65289 MISC POLICE EQUIPMENT PO# Stat Contract# Invoice#1 Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11653 0 36299 11/16/04 439.31 0.00 439.31 36352 12/03/04 276.04 0.013 276.04 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 1:30 -58 -5270 715.35 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004 /05* MAINTENANCE OF POLICE EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT ON PATROL VEHICLES PO Liquidation Amount 1.311 -58 -5270 7115.35 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank C }peck# C}-ik Date Check, Amount '_yep 3702 RALPH VILLASENIOR PAINTING Claim# General Description 65356 PANTING SRV AP 148462 01/12/05 1,91-cl.00 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Inve Dt isross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 120179 0 713032 12/30/04 1,20O.Co 0.00 1,20.00 713034 011106 /05 700.00 0.00 700.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount fork order# ActCd Description 1LIL -57 -5000 0.00 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY213O4 /O5* MAINTENANCE PAINTING FOR CITY FACILITIES, GENERAL FUND PORTION 127 -57 -5000 1,9CIO.lo 1 EA PARKS MAINTENANCE PORTION PO Liquidation Amount 127 -57 -5000 1.900.00 uCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N #AF`R7O11 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2005 09:31am Page � Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0,300 to 99/99/99990ecWACH15 148369 to 1�860 Payment Type Check Vemd# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank CheckK C1-,k Date Check Amount Sep 6640 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC AP 1lt8463 0/12/85 3,523.50 Claim% General Description 65299 TRAFFIC SIGNAL REPAIRS 7623 RlTA F BUCHANAN Cloim# General Description 65301 REIMB-NSF P0 PO# Stat 0mtnacL# Immice4 6L Distribution 100-00-4690 _-___---____----_-__--____-___- AP 1�8�65 0/12/05 20.00 Imc 0t 6r055 Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 81/12/05 20.00 0.00 20.00 Gross Amount Work Order# AchCd Description 10.00 RElMB-NSF PMT Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee 7624 R080TR0NIB INC. C!aim# General Description 65302 ANl�����F��� PO# Stat Omtr-acf# Immice# GL Distribution Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 148466 01/12/05 3,084.85 lmm Dt 6nvos Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11D9/% 3,08�.85 0.00 3,08�.85 Gross Amount Work 0nder4 ActCd Description J,084.85 ANIMATED MCGR0TCOSTUME "CS-AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) PO# Stat Contract# Iovo ce# Imc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12119 0 1390 12/21/04 1,854.84 0,00 1.854.84 1391 12/21/04 1.668.66 0.00 1.668.66 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rder# ActCd Description 121-56-500 3.523.50 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY204/05* REPAIR OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND CITY-OWNED STREET LIGHTS THROUGHOUT THE CITY PV Liquidation Amount ----------- 121-56-5000 3,523.50 --- Vend# Vendor Nome Remit0 Payee ---------------------------------------- Bank ChedkK Chk Date Check Amount Sep 1442 RESOURCE DIRECTORY AP 148464 01/12/05 68.17 ClaimK General Description ` 65300 DIRECT0RY FAM SRV CTR P0# Stat Contpact# Invoice# {nvc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/12/05 68.17 0.08 68.17 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Orden# ActCd Description 100-74-5240 ___- 68.17 DIRECTORY-FAM SRV CTR Yend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# ___-_ Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7623 RlTA F BUCHANAN Cloim# General Description 65301 REIMB-NSF P0 PO# Stat 0mtnacL# Immice4 6L Distribution 100-00-4690 _-___---____----_-__--____-___- AP 1�8�65 0/12/05 20.00 Imc 0t 6r055 Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 81/12/05 20.00 0.00 20.00 Gross Amount Work Order# AchCd Description 10.00 RElMB-NSF PMT Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee 7624 R080TR0NIB INC. C!aim# General Description 65302 ANl�����F��� PO# Stat Omtr-acf# Immice# GL Distribution Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 148466 01/12/05 3,084.85 lmm Dt 6nvos Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11D9/% 3,08�.85 0.00 3,08�.85 Gross Amount Work 0nder4 ActCd Description J,084.85 ANIMATED MCGR0TCOSTUME "CS-AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2LI15 09:31am Page 34 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #`s 148369 to 948626 Payment Type Check Vend# Vendor Game Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 2256 ROYAL COACHES AUTO BODY AP 148467 01/12/05 1,245.100 Claim# General Description 65303 TOWING 'SERV P0# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11840 O 56372 11/08/04 75.00 0.00 75.00 065519 11/10/04 250.00 0.00 250.00 065645 11/17/04 75.00 0.00 75.00 065790 11/30/04 845.110 0.00 845.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Under# ActCd Description 130 -58 -5270 1,245.00 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004/05* COLLISION DAMAGE REPAIR AND TONING PO Liquidation Amount 130 -58 -5270 1,245.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 967 F C.A.C.E.O. AP 148468 01/12/05 200.00 Claim# General Description 65304 MEMBESHIP DUES GEORGE NELSON SUZ.IE AYAL.A PO4 Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/12/0 �5 100.00 0.00 100.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -47 -5180 1110.00 G NELSON, S AYALA Claim# General Description 65305 MEMBERSHIP DUES GAIL BISHOP GEORGE RODRIGUES PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/12/! {5 10o .0O 0.00 100.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description ---------------------------------------------------------------------_-------------------------------------------------------------- 12047 -5240 -031 100.00 G BISHOP /G RODRIGUES Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep ;49 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM, INC. AP 148469 01/12/05 1,452.81 Claim# General Description 65309 BROOM REPLACEMENT 'O# ';tat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11656 O 235883 11/17/04 153.72 0.00 153.72 235984 11/241/04 311.43 0.00 311.43 236091 12/01104 311.43 0.00 311.43 236193 12/08/04 153.72 0.100 153.7 2 236302 12/15/04 522.51 0.00 522.51 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 130 -58 -523.0 1,452.81 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004/05* REPLACEMENT SWEEPER BROOMS FOR TWO (2) STREET SWEEPERS PO Liquidation Amount ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ IJO -58 ,210 1,452.81 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 4.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) :ity of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2005 09:31am Page 35 Jyment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #'s 143369 to 148626 Payment Type C }-peck ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 4186 SAN GABREIEL VALLEY ECONOMIC PARTM AP 148470 01112105 7,5 =tB.00 Maim# General Description 65310 MAP WORKSHOP AMY HARBIN MELECIO PICAZO PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Inv{_ Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount MBR1216.230 11/15/04 40.!_3!_1 0.00 40.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 101-4.8-5330-025 20.00 AMY HARBIN 100 -45 -5338 20.00 MELECIO PICA 70 Whim# General Description 65311 RENEWAL JLY '04 -,AY '05 MBR1216.180 PO# ,,tat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount MBR1216.180 07/01/04 7,500.00 0.00 7,500.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 10148- 5240 -025 7,500.00 RENEWAL JLY '04 -.AY '05 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 758 SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER AP 148471 01/12/05 3,812.67 Maim# General Description 65357 WATER SRV PUBLIC BLDG'S /PARKS / SPRINKLERS PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Cat Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Piet Amount 11753 O 0 01/04/135 3,812.67 0.00 3,812.67 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -57 -5432 239.50 1 EA *ANNUAL-FYZ004 /05# COST OF MATER FOR BUILDINGS 127 -57 -5432 831.50 1 EA COST OF WATER FOR PARKS 121 -68 -5432 2,741.67 1 EA COST OF WATER FOR 'SPRINKLERS Pit Liquidation Amount 00 -57 -5432 ';_'39 <50 121 -68 -5432 2,741.67 127-57 -5432 831.50 Vend# 'Vendor (dame Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check amount Sep 3253 SAN GABRIEL VALLEY TRIBUNE AP 148472 01/12/335 347.47 Iaim# General Description 65:.3,12 AD- CLERICAL DEP CITY CL RK PCP# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount S059578818A 11/14/04 347.47 0.00 347.47 GL Distribution Grass Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -15 -5239 347.47 S059578B18A -DEP CITY CLERK �CS,AF' Accounts Payable Release 6.13 N*APR7 00 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2005 09:31am Page 36 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates LIO /00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /Al,H #`s 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank aleck# Chk Date Check Amount '.:yep 3224 SANTA ANITA FAMILY SERVICES AP 148473 01/12/05 2,100.00 Claim# General Description 65314 SRV JLY -NOV PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Inve Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12230 O 0 01/12/05 2,100.00 0.01) 2,100.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 120 -43- 5050 -137 1,100.00 JLY -NOV PO Liquidation Amount 110 -43 -5050 -137 2,100.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vend# Vendor Game Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 4206 SCPMA -HR AP 148474 01/12/05 8111.00 Claim# General Description 65306 MEMBERSHIP 01/01- 12/31/05 GINA KNIGHT MICHELLE ALVES PO# Stat Contr=act# Invoice# Inve Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount I i 01/12/05 80.130 0.00 80.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 1013 -15 -5240 80.00 G KNIGHT /M ALVES 1/1/05 - 12/31/05 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep '667 SCS ENGINEERS AP 148475 01/12/05 4,336.58 Claim# General Description 65308 NOVEMBER SERVICES PO# Stat Contr=act# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 121107 O 0032890 11/30/04 4,336.58 0.00 4,336.58 13L Distr=ibution Gross Amount Work O der'# ActCd Description 129 -54 -5000 -873 4,336.58 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004/05* (NTE: 166,000) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RELATED TO AB939 COMPLIANCE PO Liquidation Amount _----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 129 -54- 5000 -873 4,336.58 Vend# Vendor Flame Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount 'yep 7062 SELECT OFFICE SOLUTIONS AP 148476 0'1/12/05 .353.40 ,laim# General Description 6.5316 TONER /CARTRIDGE Pia# Stat Contract# invoice# Inve Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11771 O 1� X25715 12/01/04 353.40 0.00 353.4CI GL Distr'iF�utit }n Gross Amount Work irder# ActCd Description 131 -14 -5260 -060 3.53.40 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004/05* MAINTENANCE SERVICE CONTRACT INCLUDING DRUMS, DEVELOPER 8 TONER FOR KONICA 7082 (SERIAL #56GE10441) # KONICA 7022 (SERIAL #26WE21200) PO Liquidation Amount 131 -14- 5260 -060 353.40 ,CS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2005 09:31am Page 37 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #'s 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check Vendl Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7558 SHAUNA ESPERICUETA` AP 148477 01/12/05 94.50 ,laim# General Description 65358 BATON CLASSES 11/30/04 - 01/04/05 PO4 Stat tContract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount iJ 01/12/015 94.50 0.00 94.50 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0-r -der# ActCd Description 150 -0N) -2172 94.50 BATON CLASSES 11/30/04 - 01/04/05 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vend# Vendor NarP_ Remit# Payee Bank Che{.k# Chk Date Check Amount veep 1099 SMART & FINAL AP 148478 01/12/05 63.99 S,aim# General Description 65317 MISC SUPPLIES (COUNCIL) PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amwunt Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 6441 10/08/04 57.66 0.00 57.66 31229 10/08/314 5.03 0.00 5.03 312'39 10/08/04 1.30 0 <' O 1.30 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Or <der# ActCd Description 100 -81 -52401 63.99 SUPPLIES Vend# Vendor Fume Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 4651 SMS SYSTEMS MAINTENANCE SERVICE, AP 148479 01/12/05 598.00 -laim# General Description 65307 COMPUTER HARDWARE MAINT (DEC) PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11551 0 0174478 12/01/04 598.00 01.00 598.010 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 131 -13 -5160 598.00 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004/05* POLICE CAD /RMS SYSTEM HARDWARE MAINTENANCE, 24/7, CONTRACT #0170:325 -IPA PO Liquidation Amount 131- 13--5260 598.10 wCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park ,Jan 26, 21005 09:31am Page 38 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00 /1j(1/0000 to 9919919499 t;f,ecklACH #`s 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check Vend# Vendor Flame Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk mate Check Amount Cep 779 SO. CALIF. EDISON AP 148480 01/12/05 27,826.28 Claim# General Description 65360 SRV -PARK FACILITIES PO# Stat Contract# invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 117510 0 0 12/16/04 9,680.85 0.00 4,680.85 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 127 -57 -54.33 4,680.85 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004/05* ENERGY COST FOR PARK BUILDINGS 1130 -57- 5433 -211 111.00 1 EA ENERGY COST FOR TEEM CENTER Pia Liquidation Amount 127 5� -54.33 4,680.85 .Maim# General Description 65361 ENERGY- TRAFFIC SIGNALS/ METROLINK STA /PARK N RIDE PO4 Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11761 O 0 12/30/04 4,682.37 0.001 4,692.37 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 121 -56 -5433 4,181.48 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004/05* ENERGY COST FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND STREET LIGHTS 117 -56- 5433 -053 500,89 1 EA ENERGY COST FOR METROLINK STATION AND PARK -N -RIDE LOTS PO Liquidation Amount 117 -56- 5433 -053 500.84 121 -56 -5433 4,181.48 Claim# General Description 65362 SRV- PUBLIC BLDGS PO# Stat Contract# Invc =ice# Invc Lit Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11744 O 0 12/30/04 12,987.42 0.00 12,487,42 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100-571-5433 12,487.42 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY20WO5* ENERGY COST FOR PUBLIC BUILDINGS PO Liquidation Amount 100- 57-5433 12,987.42 'iaim# General Description 65363 SRV- PUMPHOUSE STATION/ SPRINKLERS PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11756 0 0 12/30/04 475.64 0.00 475.64 GL Distribution Gross Amount Wopk order# ActCd Description 114 -61- 5433 -0144 46.18 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004/05* ENERGY COST FOR F'UMPHOUISE STATION ON PUENTE @ SAN BERNARDINO FWY 121 - 68-5433 429.46 1 EA ENERGY FOR 'SPRINKLERS THROUGHOUT THE CITY PO Liquidation Amount 114 -61 -5433 -094 46.18 --------------------------_------_-_------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 121 -68 -5433 429.46 'CS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) Cityof Baldwin Park Jan 26`2005 09-31am Page 39 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 110/00/0008 to YV/VY/PPPY Check/ACH8's 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check Vend# Vendor, Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 2����IF�lA�I��� � i�81 ��� 2Y.� Claim# 6enenal Deacripbon 65359 TEMP POWER POLE #2-25-110-1960 PO4 Staf Gmtract# Imwice# Invc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount U 12/11/0� 29.29 8.00 29.29 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0nden# ActCd Description 100-23-5210 29.29 TEMP POWER POLE ________________________________________________________________________________________ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bunk Oeck# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 1014 SOUTHERN C�NTIES 0IL, COMPANY AP 148482 U1/12/U5 2S.794.55 Claim� General Description 65318 FUEL PURCHASE PA# Stat Contnact# lnvoice4 Invc 8t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12226 C 164649 11/23/04 7.305.08 0.00 7.305.08 163258 11/2J/04 16.48Y.47 0.00 16.489.47 6L Distribution &mas Amount Work 0ndenK Actf,d Description 130-58-52113 5,909.48 ' 2500 GL PREMIUM GASOLINE 130-58-5210 450.00 1 EA CALIFORNIA GASOLINE EXCISE TAX 17J0-58-5210 2.98 1 EA ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 130-58-5210 1.90 1 EA CHILDHOOD LEAD POISONING FEE 138-58-5210 1,980.00 12110 Q' CLEAR CARB DIESEL 130-58-5210 216.00 1 EA CALIFORNIA DIESEL EXCISE TAX 130-58-5210 1.43 i EA IHYIR0NHENTAL FEE 130-58-5210 13.600.37 8477 6L PREMIUM GASOLINE 130-58-5210 i,525.86 i EA CALIFORNIA GASOLINE EXCISE TAX 130-58-5210 18.09 i EA ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 1310-58-5210 6.44 1 GA CHILDHOOD LEAD POISONING FEE P0 Liquidatzvn Amount __-----_____---_-___--___-----_-__--___-_____---___--_-_____---__-_-_-___-_---_____-__-_----______- 130-58-6210 23,794.54 Vcnd# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7421 SPORTS ILLUSTRATED AP 148483 01/121/05 3V.88 Claim# General Description 6531.35 SUBSCRIPTION K# Sfat Cvotpact4 {mwice8 Invc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 2052928799 01/12/05 39.00 0.00 .3P.O8 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rden# AcfCd Description 100-76-524U 39.00 SUBSCRIPT-ION CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 8.1,JN*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2005 09:31am Page 40 Payment History. Sank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #`s 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Sank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 783 `STAfMp OCT" AP 148484 11112/05 16, "�4 vlaim# General Description 65319 ENGRAVED SIGN Ptah Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 5834 12/20/04 16.24 0.00 16.24 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description !CIO-57 -5210 16.24 ENGRAVED SIGN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Sank: Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 6447 SUN TRUST AP 148485 01/12/05 18,579.13 'laim# General Description 65320 LEASE - PATROL CAR' PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gress Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 111685 U 965385 12/24/04 5,230.51 0.00 5,230.51 GL Distribution Gross Amount fork Order# ActCd Description 130 -58 -5733 5,079.15 1 EA #ANNUAL- FY2004 /05* LEASE PAYMENTS FOR SEVEN (7) PATROL CARS, PRINCIPAL PORTION 130 -58 -5629 151.36 1 EA INTERESI PORTION PO Liquidation Amount 130 -58 -5629 151.36 130-58 -5733 5,079.15 Iaim# General Description 65121 LEASE- TRANSIT BUSS=:! CAPT VEHICLE POI Stat %ontra"_t4 Invoice# Invc Dt Cross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12186 0 965386 12/24/04 13,348.62 0.00 13,348.62 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Girder# ActCd Description 117 -55- 5733 -172 12,980.29 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004/05* LEASE PAYMENTS FOR 5 TRANSIT BUSES (12,980.29 /MONTH) 130 -58 -5133 368.33 1 EA LEASE PAYMENTS FOR POLICE CAPTAIN'S VEHICLE 0368.33 11MONTH) PGA Liquidation Amount 117 -55- 5733 -172 12,980=29 ---------------------------_------------------------__----------------------------------------------_---- 130 -58 -5733 368.3.3 `vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Sank Check# _--- _- _- _------------ - - - - -- CI-,k Date Check Amount Sep 6241 T- MOBILE AP 148486 01/12/05 28.76 Jlaim# General Description 65326 OCT SERVICES A /C# 35201137677 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12174 0 0 11141 % 28.76 0.00 28.76 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 131 -14- 5430 -064 28.76 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY200C /05* CELLULAR PHONE USAGE FOR I.T. SUPERVISOR AND STAFF (2 PHONES @ $90 /MOf11TH FOR 7 MONTHS) PO Liquidation Amount CS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Sian 26, 2005 09;31am Page 41 . ayment History. Bank AP Payment Crates 00/ 0/0000 to 99/99/9999 Che6�/ACH #`s 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Ctreck 131 -14- 5430 -064 28.76 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank CI-eck# Chk Elate Check Amount Sep 5069 TECS ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SERV AP 148487 01/12/05 1,848.75 Claim# General Description 653 22 NPDES STORM WTR FRG PO# `:tat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11763 O Bpk -1204 12/20/04 1,848.75 0.00 1,848.75 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -52 -5000 -079 1,848.75 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004/05* PROFESSIONAL °SERVICES FOR NPDES STORM DATER PROGRAM PO Liquidation Amount 100 -52- 5000 -079 1,848.75 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount 'Sep 3932 TERMTNIX INTERNATIONAL AP 148488 0r1/12/05 85.02E Claim# General Description 65327 PEST CONTROL SERV PO# Stat Contract# invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11918 O 158139425 12/02/04 45.00 0.00 45.00 IL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order'# ActCd Description 102 -42- 5030 -014 45.00 1 EA GENERAL PEST CONTROL 12 HOUSING AUTHORITY PO Liquidation Amount 102-42-5030-014 45.00 Claim# General Description 65328 PEST CONTROL SERV PO# ;tat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11917 €1 158102475 12/02/04 40.00 0.00 40.0€0 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work, €.lyder# ActCd Description 102 -42- 5030 -013 40.2€0 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004/05* GENERAL PEST CONTROL ld PUBLIC HOUSING PO Liquidation Amount --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 102 -42 -5030-013 40.00 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 780 THE GAS COMPANY AP 148489 01/12/05 44.84 ,,Iaim# General Description 65324 SRV -HSG RUTH 148 - 918 - 40174 -7 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11555 0 0 11/29/04 17.81 0.00 17.81 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order'# ActCd Description 10242-5434 -014 17.81 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004/05* MONTHLY GAS SERVICE FOR THE HOUSING AUTHORITY BUILDING PO Liquidation Amount 102 -42- 5434 -014 17.81 'Maim# General Description -S.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *;APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldiain Park Jan 26, 2005 09.31am Page 42 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/1000 to 99/19/9999 Check /ACH #`s 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check 65325 SRV -HSG RUTH 067 - 0184100 -6 Psi# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11556 O 0 11/29/04 27.03 0.00 27.03 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Birder# Acted Description 102 -42- 5434 -013 27.03 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004/05* MONTHLY GAB SERVICE FOR MCNEILL MANOR PO Liquidation Amount .1102-42-54714-013 27.03 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# 0* [late Check Amount Sep 2585 THE SHREDDERS AP 148490 01/12/05 137.50 'claim# General 'Description 65323 DOrUMENT DESTRUCTION PO# '_tat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 59661 11/30/104 137,50 0.00 137.50 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work order# Acted Description 100 -29 -5210 137.50 DOC DESTRUi TI(Pd Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 814 TROPHY WORLD AP 148441 01./12!05 944.65 !Maim# General Description 65329 PLAQUE PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 3970 12/16/04 42.87 0.00 42.87 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Birder# Actf d Description 1041 -81 -5210 42.87 PLAQUE Claim# General Description 65330 ENGRAVE AWARD PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 3968 12/15/04 17.87 0.00 17.97 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order'# Acted Description 101 -41 -5210 17.87 ENGRAVE AWARD Clain# General Description 65 731 PLAQUE -!SARA BOUTON PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 3983 12/28/04 17.87 0.00 17.87 GL Distribution Gross ?mount Work Order# Acted Description 100 -81 -5210 17.87 PLAQUE -KARA BOUTON !aim# General Description 65332 YTH FOOTBALL TROPHY Pt I# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount used Piet Amount 12219 C 3934 12/01/04 814.64 0.00 814.64 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Birder# Acted Description 150 -00 -2154 627.59 87 EA YOUTH FOOTBALL TROPHY CC:.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2005 09.31am Page 43 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Gates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #'s 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check 150 -00 -2154 52.50 6 EA TEAM TROPHY 150 -03 -2154 134.55 39 EA ALL STAR MEDAL PO Liquidation Amount 150 -00 -2154 814.64 Claim# General Description 65333 PLAQUES PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Grass Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 3964 12/14/04 56.40 0,01 56.40 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Opder# ActCd Description 100 -81 -5210 56.40 PLAQUES ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk. [late Check Amount `_yep 5530 TURF STAR AP 148492 01/12/05 204.97 Claim# General Description 65334 NISC SUPPLIES PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# ` Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11802 0 3210397 -00 07/21x'04 204.97 0.00 2 %.97 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 121 -68 -5210 204.97 1 EA ANNUAL- FY2004 /05* PARTS AND SERVICE FOR TORO MOWERS PO Liquidation Amount 121 -68 -5210 204.97 Vend# Vendor Dame Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount ,yep 5018 UNITED MAINTENANCE :SERVICES AP 148493 01/12/05 500.00 Maim# General Description 65338 DEC MiAINT Pt1# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11558 O 5971 12/01104 500.00 0.00 500.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work tinder# ActCd Description 102- 42 -5QO -014 500.O0 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004/05* FACILITY MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR THE HOUSING AUTHORITY BUILDING PO Liquidation Amount 102-42-5420-014 500.00 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check. Amount Sep 4329 UNITED RENTALS AP 148494 01/12/05 75.00 Maim# General Description 65339 STRUCK RENTAL PO# :Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 4-5068315 12/10/04 75.00 0.00 75.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 130 -72 -5210 75.00 TRUCK RENTAL C'S.AP Accounts Payable Release 6,1.3 Cd APR70lJ By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City vf Baldwin Park Jan 26.20L15 09:31am Page A Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/80/0800 to 99Y99/9999 Check/ACH#'s 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Ohk Date Check Amount Sep 6LI92 UNITED ����.l�. � ��� 0��� 3.J�.� ` Claim# General Description 65340 CLEAN RCP INLET PO# Staf Omtnact¢ lnwdce# lmo 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12065 C SWI6407 1015/04 708.00 0.00 708.00 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work Orden ActCd Description 114-61-5210-094 708.00 1 EA CLEAN RCP 'INLET, PIPE AND OUTLET TO WASH P0 Liquidation Amount 114-61-51210-094 708.00 JaieK General Description 65541 SERV-PUEMTE AV PO#Sbat0mt-re:t# lmmice# 11797 0 SWI6671 GL Distribution ' PO Liquidation 132-16-5000 VemN Vendor Name 3895 USA ALARM SYSTEMS, INC. 2aim# General Description 65335 SRV 01/01-01/31/05 PO4Stat ComtnactVImmice# 11742 V 57626 GL Distribution 127-57-5760 P0 Liquidation 100-57-5760 2aimO General Description 65336SRV PO#StatComtract4 lmmicE4 117Q 0 57966 .57984 ' 6L Distribution 10] 57-576O-211 100-57-500-211 PO Liquidation 100-57-5760-211 ` Imc Ut Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12/07/04 2,651.50 0.08 2.651.50 Gross Amount Nvnk 0nden# ActCd Description 2.651,50 ` 1 EA *ANNUAL_FY1?004/05* DOCUMENTATION AND DISPOSAL OF HAIARDOUS WASTE MATERIALS Amount 2.651.50 ------------------------------------------------------------------- RemifK Payee Bark Check# Chk Date Check Amount Siep AP 148496 01/12/05 1'32311.00 ` }mc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 01/01/05 1,110.00 0.00 1.110.00 Gross Amount Work 0rder# ActCd Description 555.00 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2004/05* LEASE OF ALARM EQUIPME14T & MAINTENANCE SERVICES AT CITY FAClLITlES, GENERAL FUND PORTION 555,00 1 EA PARKS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PORTION Amount 555.00 555.00 lnvr 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount O1/01/ 105.00 � O5 �.00 U.0O �.80 01/0i/05 0.00 108.00 Gross Amount Work 0rden# ActCd Description 213.00 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2004/05* LEASE OF ALARM EQUIPMENT & MAINTENANCE SERVICE FOR TEEN CENTER 0.00 1 EA BI-ANNUAL FIRE INSPECTION SERVICE Amount 21J.00 ZS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jam 26, 2885 09:31am Page 45 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/999/999 Chcck/ACH#'s 148369 to 1�8626 Payment Type Check Vend# Vendor Name Remit#Paye e DankCheck# Chk Date Check Amount Sep ��U�M�IT���IR AP 148497 01/121105 550.00 Claim# General Description 65337 CERTIFY TAW MONITORING SYSTEM PO# Stat Comtrant4 Invo ce# lnvc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11657 V 7882 11/24/0 21-5.00 0.1-10 225.00 7803 11/24/04 325.0O 0.01-1 '.3 25.0U GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Orden# ActCd Description 130-58-5210 550.00 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2004/85* REPAIR & CERTlFICAT0N FOR FUEL MONITORING SYSTEM P0 Liquidation Amount 130-58-5210 550.00 Vend# Vendor Name Remit#Payee 828 VALLEY COUNTY WATER Bank Check8 0hk Date Check Amount Sep AP 148498 01/12/05 6,928.334 Claim# General Description 65342 SRV-HSG AUTH 201-15-3 PO# Stat 0mtoact# lmmice# Imc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11914 0 0 11/22/04 5.41 0.00 5.�1 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order ActCd Description 10242-5432-013 5.41 i EA «ANNU4L-FY2004/05* SERVICE FOR MCNEIL MANOR P0 Liquidation Amount 10242-5432-013 5.41 Claim0 General Description 6F364 WATER SERV PUBLIC BLDGS/TEEN CNTR PO# Stat Comtmct#Immice4 11751 0 0 6L Distribution 100-57-5432-211 P0 Liquidation 00-57-5432 100-57-5432-211 �laim0 General Description 65365 WATER SRV PARK BLI.0/SPRlNKLERS PO#S6atCont-ac!# Immice# 11752 0 0 GL Distribution 127-57-502 121-68-5432 P0 Liquidation 121-68-5432 127-57-5432 _______________________________ lmr Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12/21/04 655.32 0.00 6.55.32 Gross Amount Work, Orden ActCd Description 1 EA COST OF WATER FOR CITY BUILDINGS 427.72 1 EA COST OF WATER FOR TEEN CENTER Amount . 227.60 427.72 Imc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12/21/04 6.267.61 0.00 6.267.61 Gross Amount Work Order ActCd Description 1,793.16 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY'l-1004/05* COST OF WATER FOR PARKS 4,474.45 1 EA COST OF WATER FOR SPRINKLERS Amount 4,474.45 1,793.16 -'CS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2005 09:3,1am Page 46 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check/ACH#'a 148369 to 1486226 Payment Type Check Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 5462 VERI0NSEBCT SERVICES INC. AP 148499 0112105 113.84 Claim# General Description 65343 NOV SERVICES A/C#9453 PO4 Stat Contractu lnvvice4 lnvc 0t 6mes Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 568887 12/10/0A 13.84 0.00 13.84 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work Vrder# ActCd Description 131-14-5430-064 13.84 NOV SERV ________________________________________________________________________________________ VendK Vendor Name Rcmit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 3797 VERIZ0N WIRELESS MESSAGING SRY AP 148500 01/12/05 59.80 Claim# General Description 65344 PAGERS-CITY CLERK PO# Stat Confnact# }nvoice8 {nvc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount L8454952EK 11/01/04 . 59.88 ` 0.00 59.80 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rden# ActCd Description 100-03-5210 59.80 CITY CLERK -----_________--_--______--_-_----__-----___-_____--___--__--_-_______________-_____-_______- Yend# Vendor, Name Remit# Payee Bonk Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 5767 Y}KlM6 OFFICE PRODUCTS AP 148501 01/1205 82.25 Cloim# General Description 65345 DESK CALENDARS PO# Stat 0mtract# lnvoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Piet Amount 26757091001 12/07/04 . 82.25 0.00 82.25 6L Distribution ` Gross Amount Work 0rder4 ActCd Description 131-14-5200-063 82.25 DESK CALENDARS ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ` Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 3748 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SAN GABRlEL/PO AP 148502 01/12/05 184.68 Claim# General Description ' 65347 SRY MCNEILL MANOR #012-0026639-2519-2 P0# Stat Contracf% Invoice# Invc ;t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11818 0 �621104-2519-8 12/01/04 184.68 0.00 184.68 6L 0l'afribution Gross Amount Work ;rder% ActCd Description 102-42-5431-013 184.68 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2004/05* WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR NCNEILL MANOR P0 Liquidation Amount "CS Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A(SAN0RA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2005 09:31am Page 47 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00 /3000 t© 99/99/9999 Check /ACH#`s 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check Vend# Vendor fume Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep =:1638 WEST END UNIFORMS AP 148503 01/12/05 2,994.44 Claim# General Description 65346 UNIFORM SUPPLIES Pti# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11573 it 631.67 11/01/04 90.51 0.00 90.51 63163 11/01/04 157.32 0.00 157.32 63176 11/02/04 4.85 0.00 4.85 63177 11/02/04 136.13 0.170 136.13 63181 11/03/04 490.59 0.00 490.59 63192 11/05/04 329.72 0.00 329.72 43245 11/12/04 342.65 0.00 342.65 63243 11/12/04 171.32 0.00 171.32 63250 11/15/00 199.88 0.113 199.88 63253 11/15/04 88.89 0.00 88.89 63260 11/16/04 4.85 0.00 4.85 63305 11/22/04 43.64 0.00 43.64 63310 11/27'7 4 178.87 0.00 178.87 03312 11x'23/04 11.77 0.101 11.77 63317 11/23/04 147.62 0.00 147.62 63324 11626/04 17.40 0.00 172.40 63341 11/29/04 254.29 0.00 254.19 63347 11/30/04 87.28 0.00 87.28 63351 11130/04 81.86 0.00 81.86 GL Distribution Gross Amount bark: order# ActCd Description 100 -25 -5210 2,994.44 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004/05# POLICE DEPARTMENT UNIFORMS PO Liquidation Amount 100 -25 -5210 2,994.44 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 850 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC. P.D. BOX 288 AP 148505# 01/12/05 489.62 Claim# General Description 05348 MISC SIGNS P1# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt (Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11793 D 0071981 12/06/04 214.23 0.00 214.23 0072091 12/09/04 275.39 0.00 275.39 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work order# ActCd Description 114 -59 -5210 -094 489.62 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY21O04/05* TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGN, WARNING & REGULARTORY DEVICES PD Liquidation Amount ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 114 -59 -5211-094 489.62 - - - - -- "CS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of BaldwIn Park Jan 26, 2005 09:31am Page 48 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 0000/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check/ACHO's 148369 to 1�8626 Payment Type Check Vend Vendor Name Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Remit# Payee 12181 0 1 12/31/0� Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 8AARDVARK TACTICAL Work Orden# ActCd Description 11-3-53-5020-801 8�,6�1.04 AP 148507* 01/13/05 7121.05 Claim# General Description STREET IMPROVEMENTS - ClP 801, PROGRAM PORTION 65369 TACTICAL SUPPLIES 1 EA GAS TAX PORTION ' P0 Liquidativn Amount 113-53-5020-801 PO4 Staf Contract4 Immiceg lnve Dt Gross Amount Discount Ami Discount Used Net Amount ,-CS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 i1808 0 13025372 12/21/04 170.80 0.00 170.80 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rder# ActCd Description 100-25-5210 170.80 1 EA *ANNUALfYZA04/05* POLICE SAFETY EQUIPMENT PV Liquidation Amount 100-25-5218 170.80 Claim# General Description 65370 POLICE SAFETY EQUIP P0% Stat Contract# lnvoioe# lnvc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11808 V 0825325 12/15/04 541,25 0.08 541.25 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Vrdep# ActCd Description 100-25-5210 541.25 ' 1EA*ANNUAL-FY20WG5* POLICE SAFETY EQUIPMENT P0 Liquidation ' Amount 100-25-5210 541,25 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Claim# General Description 65371 C014CRETE IRR BOX Bank Check# Ohk Date Check Amount Sep AP 148508 01/13/05 195.00 PO# S6at Comtract# lmwice# Inm 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12089 0 80408 12/0304 1Q5.00 0.00 195.00 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work Vnder% ActCd Description 121-68-5001-1 195.00 1 E REMOVAL OF BEEHIVES IN CITY PV Liquidation Amount 121-68-5000 195.00 ______---__-____-__-_____-_________--___-_____--__----_-_-___-___------_______-_-_-_--__-__--__- VendK Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk, Date Check Amount Sep 7212 AMERICAN ASPHALT soNTH INC AP 148589 011113/05 99.577.69 Claim# General Description 65372 STREET SLURRY SEAL PR.# CIP 801 PO#StatContjaCtg InVoice# }nmDt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12181 0 1 12/31/0� 99.577~69 0.00 99,577.69 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work Orden# ActCd Description 11-3-53-5020-801 8�,6�1.04 1 EA CONSTRUCT THE 2003-200 lSTEA STREET IMPROVEMENTS - ClP 801, SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM PORTION 114-53-5020-801 14'936.65 1 EA GAS TAX PORTION P0 Liquidativn Amount 113-53-5020-801 84,641.04 114-53-50213-801 _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 14,936.65 ,-CS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 20305 09.31am Page 49 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 80/00/0800 to 94/99/9999 Check/ACH#'s 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk0ate Check Amount Sep 85 ARROW PARKING UD� AP 148510 0/13/05 6,200.00 Claim8 General Description 65373 ASPHALT PAVEMENT SEALER & RESTRIPING PO# Stat Conbact# Imwice% Imn Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12200 C 0001215 12/15/04 6.200.00 0.00 6.200.00 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rdex4 ActCd Description 117-61-5000-O96 6.200.03 1 EA 86,550 SF ASPHALT PAVEMENT SEALER & RESTRlPlN6 (NOT TO EXCEED $7.800) P8 Liquidation Amount 117-61-5000-096 7.00.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 6759 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER PR AP 148511 01/13/05 75.85 Claim# General Description 65374 DRINKING WATER ` PO# Stat Conbactg lmmice# lmc 0f Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11707 0 04LO02�861742 12121/04 75.85 0.00 75.85 6L Distribution 6msa Amount Work 0ndcr# ActCd Description 100-57-5210 75.85 1 EA *ANMUALfY200�/05* DRINKING WATER AT CITY HALL P0 Liquidation Amount 10O-57-5210 75.85 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 229 AT&T WIRELESS SERVICE AP 148512 01/13/05 1,176.00 ' Claim# General Description 65375 DEC SERVICE PO# Stat Cvntnactk Immice4 Imm Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11575 0 U 12/25/04 1,176,00 0.00 1,176.00 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work VrdeP4 ActCd Description 100-25-5430 1.176.00 i EA *ANNUALfY20O4/05* WIRELESS SERVICE P0 Liquidation Amount 11130-25-5430 1.176.00 ___-_-__--___---__-- -__-_-_____-_-__---__-----_-_____---____________--_-___--__- Vcmd#Vendor Name Remit#Payee BankCheck# Chk Date Check Amount biep 117J BALD WIN PARK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRl AP 148513 01/13/05 957.25 ClaimK General Description 65376 NOV SNACKS-LATCHKEY PRG ` POW Stat Conbract# Immice# Invc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11670 0 684 121/28/04 957.25 0.00 Y157--5 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rder# ActCd Description 0O-75-5OOO Y57.25 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2004/05* SNACKS �R LATCHKEY PROGRAM P0 Liquidation Amount 100-75-50CIO 957.25 __ _ ___ OCS.�A��n���bleR�e�e6.1JN��0O �S��AA(�0�) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2005 09:31am Page 50 Payment Hiatory. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00V130100 to 99.199/9999 Chpck/ACH#'s 148369 to 1�8626 Payment Type Check, Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee BankCheck# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 76008NNKENSHIP POLICE SUPPLY AP 148514 0/1305 1.492.77 Claim% General Description 653717 VEST COVERS PO# Stat ComtractK Invoice# lmo 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount ` 12250 C 430235 11/06/04 1.492.77 0.00 1,02.77 GL 0iatnibution Gross Amount Work 0rdenV AcfCd Description 10+23-5210 1.02.77 1 EA INVOICE #4330235 TACTICAL BALLISTIC VEST COVERS PO Liquidation Amount ______--______________-----__--_______-______-____-___--_---________-___--_-----_-___ 100-23-5210 1.4921.77 VendK Vendor Name Remit0 Payee Bank CheckK Chk Date Check Amount Sep 5774 BLUE VIOLET NETWOPK AP 148515 81/13/05 460.80 Claim# General Description ` 65378 MISC REPAIRS ` PO# Stat 0mtaa tk }mnire# lnvc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount ` 00027627 , 12/13/0� 165.00 0.00 165.00 0002760 22/13/04 65.08 0.00 65.00 0002742� ` 12/01/04 65.F10 0.00 65.1-10 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rder# AcLLCd Description 131-14-5210�m4 2Y5,00 MlSC REPAIRS Claim% General Description 65381HlSC REPAIRS PO#StatGmtract# lmmiue# Jnm0t _ Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 00827423 12/01/04 165.00 0.00 165.00 ' 6L Diatvihution Gross Amount Work Vrder# ActCd Description 100-23-521.0 165.00 REPAIRS -__---_-_ Vend# Vendor Name --_-__--___--_-_--____--_________—_-__---___________--_-____-___ Remit# Payee Bunk Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 3205 CALSAFE AP 148516 81/13/05 1.300.00 C}aimK 6enepal Description 65385 ASSAULT EXAMS _ PO4 Stat Contract Invo ce# lnvc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11568 0 929 12!15/04 050.00 0.00 650.00 930 12Y15/04 650.00 0.00 650.00 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 10-23-5800 1.300.O0 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2004/05* SEXUAL ASSAULT EXAMINATIONS P0 Liquidation Amount 100-23-5000 .1,3ari.00 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2005 09:31am Page 51 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 0000/000 h99/99/9999 Check/ACH's14069 to 1�806 Payment Type Check Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank.Check# Ohk0ate Check Amount Sep 5185 CAPE 200 CONFERENCE HILPITAS POL{ 10PE 2005 CONFERENCE AP 148517 01/13/05 210.00 Claix# General Description 65383 TUITION-EVA 0EL6AD0 ' PO# Stat ContoactK lmmice# Invc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/13/05 210.00 0.00 20.00 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0nden# ActCd Description 106-25-5340 210.00 EDELGAN3/1/05-3/4/05 _________________________________________________________________________ YendK Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check _ Amount Sep 5185 CAPE 2002 CONFERENCE NlLPlTAS P0LI 1 CAPE 2005 CONFERENCE AP 148518 01/13/015 210.00 Y Claim# General Description 653,84 EDWARD LOPEZ 3/l/05-3/5/05 PO# Stat Contract% Invoioe# INC 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/13/05 210.00 0.00 210.00 GL Distribution Gpmm Amount Work 0rden% ActCd Description _-_______---___---__--_--__-_------___--__-_--_-_----___-_-----_________--_---_--_______--_____---_- 106-25-5340 210,00 E LOPEZ 3/14/05 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee ' Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 4544 CAR QUEST AUTO PARTS-DISTRIBUTION AP 148519 01/13/05 28A.92 C1aim# General Description 65380 MISC. AUTO PARTS PO# Stat Cootxa:t4 }nvvice# Imr Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11632 C 170-030130 11/10/04 284.92 0.00 284.Y2 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0ndep# ActCd Description 130-58-5210 284.92 1 EA *ANNU#L-FY200405* AUTO PARTS AND SUPPLIES P0 Liquidation Amount _____---____-_--__-___-_____--______----________----__-____---__--__---_-_-_________-_---_-----____ 130-58-5210 237.31 VendK Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Dote Check Amount Sep 7203 CHlCA'S GRAPHICS, INC. #P 148520 01/13/05 703.63 Claim# General Description 65386 TEMP NO PARKING SIGNS P0# Stat Contnact# Invvice4 Imc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12194 C 81301 01/05/85 783.63 0.00 703.63 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0nder4 ActCd Description 114-59-5210-094 703.63 1 N TEMPORARY "NV PARKING" SIGNS, 5AM-5PM PV Liquidation Amount 114-59-5210-894 703.63 - !.CS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2CIL15 09.31am Page 52 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Bates 00/0010000 to 99/99/9999 Check/ACH #`s 148369 to 148626 Payment Type C }-peck ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Seep 250 COLEN & LEE AP 148521 01/13/05 5,800.00 Claim# General Description 65387 GEN & AUTO LIAR/ WRKRS COMP 01/01/05 -01 /31/05 PO# ;tat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11544 O 11544 01/04/05 5,800.00 0.00 5,800.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Mork Order-4 ActCd Description 132- 16-5000 5,800.01 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004/05* LIABLITIY & WORKERS; COMPENSATION ADM INISTRATIOIN FEES (t58001MO) PO Liquidation Amount 132 - 16 -5000 5,800.00 ----------------------------.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.------.---- Vend# Vendor game Remit# Payee Bank Check# irk Date Check Amount Sep 4655 CONFIDENTIAL INVE'=TIGATIVE SERVICE AP 148522 01/13/05 1,689.90 Claim# General Description 65379 BACKGRffl4D INVESTIGATION PO# Stat Cont_ract# Inv {rice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12251 C 0 11/03/04 1,689.90 0.00 1,689.90 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work, Order# ActCd Description 100 -25 -5000 1,689.90 1 EA INVOICE PI 22471 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION, 5 OSEGUERA & J ALVERAZ PO Liquidation Amount 100 -25 -50020 1,689.90 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7045 CYNTHIA REIFLER FLORES DBA: MARIAC AP 148523 01./13/05 341.25 Claim# General Description 65390 MARIACHI CLASSES 12/06/05 - 01/10/05 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11676 0 0 01 /13/05 341.25 0.00 341.5 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 1501 -00 -2172 341.25 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004/ J5* CONTRACT SERVICES TO PROVIDE MARIACHI CLASSES PO Liquidation Amount 250 -00 -2172 341.25 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Seep 7147 D &R OFFICE WORKS INC AP 148524 01/13/05 5,005.48 Claim# General Description 65389 FURITURE P-04 Stat Contpact# Invoice# Inve Dt Gross Amount Discount Art Discount Used Net Amount 12248 C 0E+63878 11/22/04 5,005.48 0.00 5,005.48 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 112 -25- 5409 5,005.48 1 EA INVOICE #0063878 -IN COMPUTER CORNER W /ROLL KEYBOARD, BOOKCASE W/4 SHELVES, BRIDGE RIGHT, CLOSED DOOR HUTCH, TASK CHAIR GRAVEL CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR70f! By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2005 09:31am Page 53 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/002 /0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /AfCH #`s 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check PO Liquidation Amount 112-25 -5409 _---------------------`----:------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5,015.48 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank €,heck# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 876 DARRYL KOSAKA AP 148525 01/13/05 84.96 Claim# General Description 65391 REIMS MONTHLY EXPENSES PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/131,05 84.94 0.130 84.96 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work tinder# ActCd Description 104 -25 -5340 ---------------------------------------_------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 84.94 REIMB EXP Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check amount Sep 5784 DAVID LOPEZ AP 148526 01/13/05 85.45 Claim# General Description 65393 REIMB MONTHLY EXPENSES PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc: Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/13; 015 85.44 0.00 85.44 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work tinder# ActCd Description 100 -53 -5210 85.46 REIMS EXP Vend# Vendor name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 2704 DAVID REYNISO AP 148527 01/13/05 344.36 Claim# General Description 65394 REIMB MONTHLY EXPENSES PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/13/05 81.36 0.00 81.36 GL Distribution Gross Amount (pork tinder# ActCd Description 106 -25 -5340 81.36 REIMB EXP Claim# General Description 65395 REIMB MONTHLY EXPENSE'.. PO# .tat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 1.11/13/05 263.021 0,00 263.03 GL Distribution Gross Amount ()orb, Order# ActCd Description 150 -00 -2187 243.00 REIMB EXP Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7466 EDWARD A LULEVITCH AP 148528 01/13/105 1,345.00 Claim# General Description 65368 SRV 1/3/05 -1/6/05 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount CBPO106 01/06/05 1,365.00 0.00 1,365.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work tinder# ActCd Description 1013 -12 -50313 900.90 SRV 1/ -6/05 101 -12- 5030 -020 109.20 SRV 1/3 -6/05 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR7010 By 'SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2005 09:31am Page 5't Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/08/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check/ACHK's 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check OCS,AP Accounts Payable Release h.i.3N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) 101-12-5030-025 109.20 SRV 1/37-6/05 118-12-5030-056 54.60 SRV 1/03-06/C6 118-12-5030-056 54.60 SRV 1/03-06/05 131-12-507JO-000 136.50 SRV 1/03-06/05 __---__-___--______---_______-__-----_--_____--___--_____--__---___-_____------_____-__ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 5084 EDWARD LOPEZ AP 148529 01/13/05 168.00 ClaimK General Description 65404 PER 0I[H 03/01/05-03/0 4/05 PO4 Stat Cvnbact4 Immice# {nvr 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/13/05 168.00 0.00 168.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rder# ActCd Description 106-25-334O 168.00 PER DIEM 3/14/05 _______________________________________________________________________________________________ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 2122 EVA �l�&0 AP 148530 01/13/05 168.00 Claim# General 0escoqdbm 65405 PER DIEM 3/1-4/05 ' PO# Stat Comtaact# Immiceg lnvc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/1305 168.00 0.00 168.00 6L Distribution 6nvaa Amount Work Orden# ActCd Description 106-25-53Q 168.80 PER 0lEH 3/14/05 ----- Vend# ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Vendor Name Remit8 Payee Bank Chcck# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 462 HYATT REGENCY SACRMENTD 1 HYATT REGENCY AP 148531 01/13/05 413.60 ClaimK General Description ` 65406 LODG1NGEVA DELGAD 3/l/05-31104/05 ' PO# Stat Comtnacf4 Immice# Invc 0f Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount U 81/137kO5 413,60 0.001 413.60 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rdeA ActCd Description __--------______--________-_-_-_---______--__--___---_-__-__--____--__---_-________---___--_-____ 106-25-5340 413.60 EVA 0EL6ADO 3/1/05-3/4/05 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 462 HYATT REGENCY SACRMENTO i HYATT REGENCY AP 148532 01/13/05 413.60 Y C>aim# General Description 65407 LODGING-EDWARD LOPB3/1/04-3/�/05 P0# Stat Cvntnact# Iovoice# lnwc 8t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/13/05 �13.60 8.00 413.60 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rder# ActCd Description __________________________________________________________________________________________________ 106-25-5340 413.60 E LOPEZ OCS,AP Accounts Payable Release h.i.3N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2005 09.31am Page 55 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00 /00 /0100 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #`s 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Cl* Date Check Amount 'yep 7149 JOSEPH ESCANDON AP 148533 01/13/05 2011.00 Claim# General Description 65408 DJ SERVICES 02/11105 PO# Stat Contract# invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/13/05 201.00 0.00 200.00 GL Distribution Grass Amount Mork Carder# ActCd Description 150 -00 -2172 200.00 DJ 2/11105 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vend# Vendor Fume Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk mate Check Amount Sep 3268 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE AP 148534 €11/13/05 112.00 Claim# General Description 65409 TRAINING 1/12/05 G KNIGHT M PICAZO R RAMIREZ M ALVES PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount used Net Amount 0 01/13/05 112.IJL 0.00 '.12.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 1s_1O -15 -5330 56.00 G KNIGHT, M ALVES 100-03 -5330 28.00 R RAMIREZ 101 -48- 5330 -025 28.01 M PICAZO Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 1312 LORENA JOANNE FATA- WILSON AP 148535 01/13/05 580.00 Claim# General Description 65410 GYMNASTICS 12/7 -14/05 PCB# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12187 0 0 01/133/05 580.00 0.00 580,00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 150 -00 -2172 580.00 1 Eli #ANNUAL- FY20041105* PROVIDE GYMNASTICS CLASSES PO Liquidation Amount 150 -00 -2172 580.00 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Punk Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 4997 METRtOPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHOR AP 148536 311/13/05 28,050.00 Claim# General Description 65413 SERV RENDERED ON GRANT PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 800027923 05/19/04 28,050.00 0.00 28,050.0 €0 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 117 -55 -5000 -172 28,050.00 SERVICE CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) "ity of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2005 09:31am Page 56 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates CIO /00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #'5 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check Vend# Vendor, flame Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 2494 MICHAEL HEMENWAY AP 148537 01/13/05 240.69 Claim# General Description 65411 REIMB EXPENSES PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Inve Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/13/015 37.57 0.00 37.57 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 106 -25 -5340 37.57 REIMB EXP Claim# General Description 65412 REIM MONTHLY EXP PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Cat Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01' 13/05 203.12 0.00 203.1 "2 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 106-125-5344) 203,12 REIMB EXP Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 5459 PLATINUM PLUS FOR BUSINESS AP 1485:38 01/13/05 500.00 Claim# General Description 65396 JANUARY STATEMENT BILL VAN CLEAVE PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gress Amount Miscount Amt Discount Used Net Amount O 01/%/05 500.00 0,00 500.00 GL distribution Gross Amount Work Order•# ActCd Description 100 -1,10 -2800 500.00 JAN STATEMENT Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 5459 PLATINUM PLUS FOR BUSINESS AP 148539 01/13/05 267<30 Y Claim# General Description 65397 JANUARY STATEMENT MANUEL LOZANCa PO# ''tat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/04/05 267.30 0.C1! 267,30 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd [Description 100 -01- 5330-100 67.80 JAN- MANUEL LOZANO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 100 -15 -5239 194.50 JAN- MANUEL LOZANO Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check - - - - -- Amount Sep 5459 PLATINUM PLUS FOR BUSINESS AP 148540 01/13/05 311.17 Y "Iaim# General Description 65398 JANUARY STATEMENT SID MOUSAVI PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/04/05 311,17 0.00 311.17 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -15 -5239 259.50 .IAN -SID MOUSAVI 100 -02 -5210 51.67 JAN -'SID MOUSAVI MC'S.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) Cityof Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2005 09:31am Page 57 nayment Hi5tmwy. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to YY/YV/YYVP Check/ACHO'a 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check Vemd# Vendor, Name Remit#Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 5459 PLA TINUM PLUS FOR BUSINESS AP 148541 01/13/05 50.0 Y Claim# General Description 65399 JAN STATEMENT RlCARDO PACHEC0 . PO4 Stat Cvnfnact% lnvvice# lnvc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount O 01/04/05 50.87 0.00 50.87 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rder8 ActCd Description ____ 180-01-5210 __________________________________________________________________________________ 50.87 ' JAN-R PACHEC0 Vend Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check8 Chk Date Check Amount Sep 5459 PLATINUM PLUS FOR BUSINESS AP 148542 01/13/05 113.95 Y Claim8 General Description 654LILI JAN STATEMENT MARLEN GARCIA P0# Stat Contract3 lnvoice# . lnvc 0t 6ro5a Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/04/05 113.95 8.08 113.95 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rde»# ActCd Description 100-01-5330-103 113.95 M 6ARCIA-JAN __- VendK Vendor Name _---_--__-____--_-___-----__-_---___--_--_---____---____-____- Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 5459 PLATINUM PLUS FOR BUSINESS AP 148543 01/13/05 280.44 Y Claim# 6enen81 Description ' ` 65481 JAN STATEMENT MAMUEL CARRILLO PO# Stat Qmtnact# lmmice# }mc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/04/05 280,44 0.00 280,44 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0nden# ActCd Description 100-71-5210 Q.28 . JAN-M CARRlL0 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ 100-81-5218 237.16 JAN-M CARRILL0 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 6447 SUN TRUST AP 1�8544 01/13/85 14.570.07 Claiw4 General Description ' 65Q2 VEHICLE LEAS ' ,"0# Stat Cowtranf# Immice# lmr Dt 6rv5s Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 1109 0 968561 01/04/05 14,50.07 8.00 14.570.07 6L Di5tribution Gross Amount Work Vrde»% ActCd Description 130-58-5733 1�,018.33 1 EA *ANNUALfY2884/05* LEAS[ PAYMENTS FOR 22 VEHICLES ($14.010.35/MN) 120-47-5733-031 559.74 1 E *ANNUAL-FY2004/05* LEAS[ PAYMENT,,' FOR CODE ENFORCEMENT VEHICLE (1559.74/1110) P0 Liquidation un Amount 120-47-5733-051 559.74 130-58-5733 14,010,33 -'CS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR7LIfj By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26' 12.00.5 09-31am Page 58 Payment History. 800k AP Payment Dates 00/00/8000 to 99/9919999 Chedk/ACH#'a 14836 to 148626 Payment Type Check Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Qhk Date Check Amount Sep 780 THE GAS COMPANY AP 148515 01/13/05 6,030.76 Claim0 General Description 65414 SERV-PURLIC BLD6, TEEN CENTER, PARK BLDG PO# Stat Contract# Immice# {nvc 8t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11754 O 0 01/O4/05 6.030.76 0.80 6.038.76 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rden# ActCd Description 180-57-5434 �.O�8.69 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY20134/05* GAS CAST FOR PUBLIC BUILDINGS 127-57-5434 1.686.66 1 EA GAS COST FOR PARK BUILDINGS 108-57-5434-211 303.41 1 EA GAS COST FOR TBN CENTER P0 Liquidation Amount 100-57-5434 4.048.69 1L113-57-54J4-211 303.41 127-57-5434 1,686.66 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ Vemd#Vendor Name Remit#Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7625 TRANSWVRLD SYSTEMS AP 148546 01/13/05 1.199.08 Claim# General Description 65403 C0LLECTI0N SERVICES P0# Stat Contract% Invoice# lnvc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 1009679 01/10/05 1.199.00 0.00 1.199.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rder# ActCd Description 132-16-500 1,199.08 COLLECTION SERVICES ---_-_--__-_----__--__--_--___-__-___---__--_____--_-__--____--_---__--_-_----_______-__-_____-_--__--_ Vend4t Vendor Name kemit% Payee Bank Checkf Chk Date Check Amount Sep 5052 ACTION DESlGNI AP 1Q548* 01/18/05 943.94 Claim% General Description 65392 UNIFORMS-BOOT CAMP PO# Stat Confo* t# Immice# {mr Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/14/05 94J.94 0,80 943.94 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0nder# ActCd Description 150-00-2187 943.94 UNIFORMS-BOOT CAMP ___---__-_--_---__--_--_-_-______-___-_-_-_____--_-___-_--________----________________-____ Vend# Vendor Name RemitO Pa�e Bank Chpd� Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7628 BARBARA VRNELAS AP 148549 01/1005 20.00 -laim# General Description 65436 REFUND ADULT HIP HOP CLASS ' PO# Siat Comtract# lmwice# lmc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/17/05 20.00 8.80 20.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0nden# ActCd Description 150-CICI-2172 20.00 REFUND-HIP HOP CLASS _-____---_---___--____-_--_--_--___--__-_--_-__------_____---___---_____--____---__-__--__-----_-__ CCS.AP A(-counts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2005 09.31am Page 59 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/000 to 99/99/9999 Check /KH #'s 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk [fate Check Amount Sep 1521 CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AP 148550 01/18/05 750.00 "laim# General Description 65417 CASH -EMPLY AWARDS 1OL475.00EA EMPLY REC DINNER '05 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/17/05 750.00 0.00 750.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 100-81-5330 750.00 CASH AWARDS EMPLY REC DINNER 1/21/05 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 3291 COMMERCIAL LANDSCAPE SUPPLY, INC AP 148551 01/18/05 23.73 Claim# General Description 65420 MISC SUPPLIES PO# Stat Contra;_1 Invoice# Invc_ Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11599 0 126260 11/18/04 23.73 0,00 23.73 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 121 -67 -5210 0.00 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004 -05* SAFETY 'SUPPLIES, GOGGLES, VESTS, HARD HAT'S, MISCELLANEOUS SAFETY EQUIPMENT AND COMMERCIAL LANDSCAPE TOOLS, COURT REFERRAL PORTION 121 -68 -5310 23.73 1 EA LANDSCAPE PORTION PO Liquidation Amount 121 -68 -5210 23.73 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7132 CRYSTAL BY DESIGN CO. INC. AP 148552 01/18/05 444.91 "laim# General Description 65434 GLASS AWARD'S PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 14 -19105 01/13/05 444.91 0.00 444.94 GL Distribution gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -81 -5330 444.91 GLASS AWARDS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 5836 DEL REY CHEMICAL COMPANY AP 148553 01/18/05 584.06 laim# General Description 65422 GRAFFITI REMOVER PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12260 C 34137 11/30/04 584.06 0.00 584.06 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work tinder# ActCd Description 1010 -64 -5210 584.126 4 CS NO MAS GRAFFITI REMOVER PO Liquidation Amount 100 -64 -5210 584.06 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) CS.AP Accounts Payable Release id 6,1.3 APR700 -.ityvf Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2005 09:31am Page 00 Jayment Hi5tm-y. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/01-100 to YV/VV/YYYV Check/ACH#'a 1&8369 to 1�&626 Payment Type Check Vend# Vendor, Name Remit# Payee BankCheck# Qhk Date Check Amount Sep �91&EPT OF JUST}CE ACCOUNTING OFFICE- AP 148554 01/18/05 Claim# General Description 65423 FINGERPRINT SRV CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) PO4 Stat ContPaotg Immice#' Imr 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/17/05 32,00 0.00 32.00 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work Onder# ActCd 0escniptimn ' 100-15-5008 32.00 FINGERPR[NTSRV Vemd# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 4181 EMBLEM ENTERPRISES, INC. AP 148555 01/18/O5 321.65 Claim# General Description 65424 POLICE PATCHES PO4 Sbat Contrect# Immice% {nvc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11810 0 22-39.213 12/10/04 321.65 0.00 321.65 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rden# ActCd Description 100-25-5210 321.b5 1 EA »ANNUALfY2004/05* PATCHES & CPL CHEVRONS P0 Liquidation Amount ' 100-25-5210 321.65 __________________ VendO Vendor Name Remit# Payee __________________________________ Bank Chcck# Cl* Date Check Amount Sep 364 FOOTHILL TRA8IT AP 148556 01/18/85 4&5.00 Claim# General Description 65415 BUS PASS SALES PO4 Stat Conbact# Invoice4 {nvc 0t 6nv55 Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount ' 1550 01/13/05 0,00 0.00 ` 485.0rl 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rder# ActCd Descniptivn 10U-00-2062 0,00 BUS PASS SALES __-_________-_____-_---__-______-_-__-__-_--_---_-___------___--___------_-____----____-__--___- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 4465 FUTURE DATA SYSTEM8, INC. AP 148557 01/18/05 233.33 C}aim# General Description 65425 INK CARTRIDGE Pol Stat Contaact# Immiceg Imc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12206 C 16845 12/17/04 233.33 0.00 233.33 @- Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rden% ActCd Description 100-57-5210 81.33 2 E #57 HP INK CARTRIDGE, TRI COLOR 100-57-5210 42.00 2 EA #56 HP INK CARTRIDGE, BLACK 100-57-5210 52,08 2 EA #45 HP INK CARTRlDGE, LARGE BLACK 10-57-5210 58.08 2 [A #78 HP INK CARTRIDGE, TRl COLOR P0 Liquidation Amount 100-57-5210 233.33 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Fart; .Jan 26, 2005 69.31am Page 61 Dayment H- Istory. Banff; AF Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99,/99/9999 Check /ACH #'s 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check Vend# Vendor, Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount 'Sep 179 GALLS /L.B. UNIFORM CO AP 148558 01/18/€15 50.77 `llaim# General Description 65426 MISC SUPPLIES PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 62.3064 -01 12/08/04 50.77 0.00 50.77 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 1C €O -25 -5210 50.77 'SUPPLIES ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 4328 GE CAPITAL AP 148559 01/18/05 1,187.36 "laim# General Description 65428 COPIER LEASE -DEC (SR CENTER) #MRYiO'7328 ID #90133320390 FO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12266 O 60481358 12/15/€54 137.48 0.00 137.48 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 131 -14- 5760 -062 137.48 1 EA #ANNUAL- FY2004/05* COPIER LEASE, 'SENIOR CENTER CANON 201 €:iF PO Liquidation Amount 131 -14- 5760 -062 137.48 Claim# General Description 65429 COPIER LEASE -TEEN CENTER SER# 26WE21200 Ptl# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11778 O 40828872 12/12/04 133.37 0. 00 1:33.37 GL Distribution Gross Amount Wopk Order# ActCd Description 131 -14- 5760 -060 0.€50 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2004 /05# LEASE PAYMENTS FOR KONICA 7 €.€82 COPIER, SERIAL #56GE10441, ACCOUNT #72253281 - €02 131 -14 -5710 -062 1 33.37 1 EA KONICA 7022 COPIER, SERIAL #26NE2112110, ACCOUNT #7253281 -001 PO Liquidation Amount 131 -14 -5760 -€562 133.37 Claim# General Description 65430 COPIER LEASE -PRINT SHOP SER# 56GE10441 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11778 O 40828978 12/12/04 916.51 0.00 916.51 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work (order# ActCd Description 131 -14 -5760 -060 916.51 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2064 /= €5* LEASE PAYMENTS FOR KONICA 7082 COPIER, SERIAL #56GE10441, ACCOUNT 47253281 -€102 131 -14- 5760 -062 0. €10 1 EA KONICA 7022 COPIER, 'SERIAL #26WE21200, ACCOUNT #7253281.001 PO Liquidation Amount 131 -14- 5760 -060 916.51 CCJ.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR70O By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 0.2005 09:31am Page 62 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check/ACH#'s1�8369h1�8626 Payment Type Check Vemd# Vendor Name Remit#Payee BankCheck# OhkDate Check Amount Sep 400 GRAINGER, INC. 1 GRAlNGER DEPT 440-82333460 AP 148560 01/18/05 2117.28 ClaimK General Description 65427 MTSC SUPPLIES "laic# General Description 65433 MISC SUPPLIES PO#0atContract# }nvoioe# 11716 0 8165476 1055302 582134 G1[W4Y7 7191192 2564914 71864T0 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1,3 N*APR700 Inve Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used 111'2904 PO# Sfat ComtaactK ]mmice# Invc 0t 6»oaa Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12/86/0 11819 0 457-087665-8 11/23/04 85,93 0.00 85.93 12/09/04 233.69 457-722233-6 12/03/04 121.35 0.00 121.35 12/15/0� 6L Distribution 0.00 Gross Amount Work 0nder# ActCd Description 0.00 117-69-5218-052 207.28 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2084/05* SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT P0 Liquidation Amount 117-64-5210-052 207.28 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 3338 KARRINGT0N 6E0I8NICAL EN6INEERIK AP 148561 01/18/05 931.00 Claim# General Description 65431 DECEMBER SERV PO# Stat Contract% lnvviceg Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12048 V 10111 01/07/05 667.00 0.00 667.08 GL Distnihution Gross Amount Work 0rder# ActCd Description 114-53-5028��4 667.00 1 EA *ANHUAL-FY2004/05* SOILS ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR BLBCKBKNU0IA STREET STORM DRAIN, CIP 89 P0 Liquidation Amount 114-53-5020-884 667.00 Claim# General Description 65432 DEC SERV BARNES PARK PO* Stat Contracf# lmmioe# Invc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount i1801 V 10110 81/07/05 264.0U 0.00 264,O0 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0ndez# ActCd Descniption i39-�-5U-110-619 264,00 1 E *ANNUALfY2004/05* SOILS ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR BARNES PARK IMPROVEMENTS, ClP 619C P0 Liquidation Amount _________________________________________________________________________________________________ 139-53-5020-69 264.00 Vend# Vendor Name Remif# Payee Bank Check# C�hk Date Check Amount Sep 4878 HOME DEPOT AP 148562 01/18/05 649.36 "laic# General Description 65433 MISC SUPPLIES PO#0atContract# }nvoioe# 11716 0 8165476 1055302 582134 G1[W4Y7 7191192 2564914 71864T0 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1,3 N*APR700 Inve Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used 111'2904 132.97 0.00 12/03/0 19.41 8.00 12/86/0 114,72 0.00 1207/04 130.24 0.00 12/09/04 233.69 0.813 12/1004 73.42 0.00 12/15/0� 23.41 0.00 12/20K04 34.14 0.00 Net Amount 132.97 1Y,4i 114.72 23.69 73^42 2J.�1 J4.1� By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2005 09.31am Page 63 "aymen,t History. Bank AP Payment Gates 00/00/00 00 to 99,99/9999 Check /ACH #`s 148369 to 1486?6 Payment Type Check CC'_.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1 .3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) 7576489 12/20/04 97.36 0.Cf0 97.36 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -57 -5210 167.11 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004/05* HARDWARE SUPFLIES, GENERAL FUND PORTION 127 -57 -5210 482.25 1 EA PARKS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PORTION PO Liquidation Amount 100 -57 -5210 167.11 127 -57 -5210 482.25 .------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Cheek Amount Sep 477 INDEPENDENT CITIES ASSOCIATION C/O AP 148563 01/18/05 450.00 Claim# General Description 65443 REGIST- MARLEN GARCIA WINTER SEMINAR Z/18/05- 2/20/05 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# love Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/ 17/05 456.00 0.0r i 450.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -01- 5330 -103 450.00 M GARCIA2 /18 -20/05 Vend4 Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Cheek# Chk Date Check Amount :=yep 1179 INLAND EMPIRE STAGES, LTD, AP 148564 01/18/05 1,754.00 Claim# General Description 65435 SR TRANSPORTATION PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# love Dt gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11662 O 16572 12/21/04 615.00 0.00 615.00 16571 12,'21/04 582.1,10 0.00 582.00 16312 11/29/04 557.00 0.00 557.00 GL Distribution dross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 117 -55 -5000 -055 1,754.00 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004/05* PROVIDE TRANSPORTATION FOR SENIOR CITIZEN TRIPS PO Liquidation Amount -------------------------------------------------------------------------_------------------------------------------------------- 117 -55- 5000 -1355 1,754.00 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank C }heck# Chk Date Cheek Amount Sep 505 J.G. TUCKER & SONS AP 148555 01/18/05 164.97 Claim# General Description 65418 FIRST AID NITS PO# ' =tat Contrast# Invoice# Inve Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11692 0 439614 07/02/04 164.97 0.00 164.97 GL Distribution Gross Amount Word order# ActCd Description 114 -61- 5210 -094 164.97 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004/05* SAFETY 'SUPPLIES PO Liquidation Amount 114 -61- 5210 -094 164.97 CC'_.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1 .3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2005 09:31am Page 64 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates OO /CfT /0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #'s 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check Vend# Vendor game 7317 JWA URBAN CONSULTANTS INC. Claim# General Description 65491 CONSULTING SRV 12/26/04- 01/08/05 PO# Stat Contrract# Invoice# 12068 0 BP -16 GL Distribution 12041- 5000 -030 Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 148566 01/18/05 22,270.00 Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 01/10/05 22,270.00 0.00 22,270.00 rosy Amount Work Order# Act' :d Description 5,567.50 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY20N/05* CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & H10USING DEPARTMENT, CDBG PORTION (25 %) 101 - 41-5000 -020 2,227.00 1 EA SAN GABRIEL RIVER PORTION (10%) 101 -41- 5000 -022 2,227.00 1 EA PUENTE - MERCED PORTION (107.) 10141 -5000 -023 2,227.00 1 EA CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT PORTION (107.) 1.0141 -5000 -024 2,227.00 1 EA DELTA PORTION (107.) 10141- 5000 -0215 2,227.10 1 EA SIERRA VISTA PORTION (10 %) 109 -41 -5000 1,113.50 1 EA AIR ;UALITY IMPROVEMENT PORTION (51) 10242- 5000 -014 4,454.00 1 EA HOUSING PORTION (20'/,) PO Liquidation Amount 101- 41-5000 -020 2,227.00 10141- 5000 -022 2,227.00 101 -41- 5000 -023 2,227.00 101 -41- 5000 -024 2,227.00 101-41-5000-025 2,227.00 102 -42 -5000 -014 4,454.00 109 -41 -5000 1,113.50 120 -41 -5000 -030 5,567.50 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee 520 k & V BLUEPRINT SER. 1 KV BLUEPRINT, INC. Claim# General Description 65438 PRINTING SRV Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 148567 01/18/05 1,390.52 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount PS109561 101/06/05 120.75 0.00 120.75 GL Distribution Gross Amount Mork Order# ActCd Description 118 -53 -5020 -632 120.75 PRINTING SRV Claim# General Description 65439 TONER PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11899 O 76597 12/23/04 545.25 0.00 51f5.25 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -52 -5210 545.25 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004/05* REPRODUCTION AND PRINTS, ROLLS OF PAPER, AND MAINTENANCE OF XEROX MACHINE PO Liquidation Amount 110 -52 -5210 545.25 Claim# General Description 65440 PRINTING SRV :CS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 24105 09:31am Page 65 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/08/8088 to 99/99/9999 Check/ACH4's 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check PO# Stat 0mtrant# Imwice# Imn 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12263 C PSIO8518 12/06/04 724.52 8.00 724.52 GL Distribution Gross Amount WorkOrder# ActCd Description 118-53-5020-632 724.52 1 EA PRINTING SERVICES FOR MAINE AVE IMPROVEMENTS, ClP 632 PO Liquidation Amount 118-53-5020-632 724.52 __________________________________________________________________________________________ Vend# Vendor, Name RemitK Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 526 KEYSTONE UNIFORMS DBA/ UNIFORM HEA AP 148568 01/18/05 917.69 Claim# General Description 65492 UNIFORM SUPPLIES PO# Stat C;ntna,t# In:oice# {nvc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 2780 ' 12/15/04 172.98 0.00 172.98 2781 12/15/04 168.33 U.U0 168.33 2789 12/15/04 221.64 0.80 221.64 @- Distribution Gross Amount Work Vrder# ActCd Description 100-25-5210 562.95 UNIFORM .90PPLIB ' C]aim4 General Description 65493 UNIFORM SUPPLIES (B ROOT) PO# Stat Contract# Immice# lmn Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11572 C 2791 12/21/04 354,7f 0.80 354.74 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rder4 ActCd Description 100-25-5210 354'74 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2104/05* POLICE DEPARTMENT UNIFORMS P0 Liquidation Amount . 100B5-52,10 _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 212,18 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 6872 KNIGHT & ASSOCIATES AP 148569 81/18/05 �0.00 Claim# General Description 65444 POLYGRAPH SRV ` PO# Stat Contject# Imwice# }mc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount BPP0 0�-126 12/061'04 225.00 0 .00 225.00 BPP0 O4-127 12/09/04 225.00 0.00 'IL5.00 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work Order& ActCd Description 100-25-5000 -__---___--__ 450.00 --__-_--______-___--_-_-_-_-----_-_______--___-__-___------_-___ POLYGRAPH SRV Venog Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# ChA Date Check Amount Sep 7536 KNOW GANGS AP 148570 01/18/05 810.00 '.laim� General Description ` �45L���0�'O'tiD02/04-1203/04 PO# Stat Conbac#t Immice# lnvc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 1220 C 1013 10/24/04 810,801 0.80 810.80 @- Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 106-25-5330 810.00 1 EA INVOICE #1013 LAS VEGAS CONFERENCE, 12D&3/2004 P; Liquidation Amount 106-25-5330 810.00 ' 'CS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 ' By SANDRA A (SANDRA) 'ity of Baldwin Park Jan 26.2005OP:31am Page 67 Dayment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/000 to 99/94/9999 Check/ACH4'5 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check Vendg Vendor Name Remit#Payee Bank Check4 Ohk0ate Check Amount Sep 24�0S���S��Y�����lC � ��71 0��O 1,4�.4� '1aim# General Description 65446 NOVEMBER SRV 0# Stat Controct# Invvice# Iovr 0t 6r9ss Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11897 0 AR316811 12/28/04 1.473.44 0.00 1.473.44 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rden# ActCd Description ' 121-56-5000 1,473.A 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2004/05* ROUTINE AND EXTRAORDINARY MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND HIGHWAY SAFETY LIGHTS. INCLUDING lNTERESECTIONS SHARED WITH CITY OF lRWIN0ALE PV Liquidation Amount 121-56-50013 1.473.44 ` Vemd# Vendor- Name Remit8Payee Bank Check# Ohk Date Check Amount Sep 7150 LAURANIB0 AP 148572 01/1805 1,500.00 2aim% General Description 65489 GIFTS/CERTIFICATES EHPLY RE% DINNER '05 PO4 Stat Cvntruct# Invoice# Invc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/1T/05 1,500.00 0.00 1,50N.O8 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rcen8 ActCd Description 150+0-2176 1.80.00 GIFTS/CERTIFICATES EMPLY RE% DINNER '85 __-_-___--__--_---_-__-_-_----_-___--_-_-______----_----___-_____--_-_-_--____----________-______- VcndA Venri"or Name Remit# Payee Bank Chedk# Chk Date Check. Amount Sep 2392 LAWN MOWER CORNER AP 148573 01/18/1-15 360.62 Claim# Gen-pal Description ' 65447 PARTS/LABOR POW Stat Contoact% Invvice# lhvc 0f` Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11590 0 52810 11/10/04 98.02 0.00 98.02 52179 ii/24/04 30.31 0.00 30.31 Q- Distribution 6cvsa Amount Work 0rder# ActCd Description 121-65-5210 0.00 i EA *AHNUAL-FY20O4/05* PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF SMALL LANDSCAPE EQUIPMENT, TREES PORTION 121-67-5210 0.00 1 EA COURT REFERRAL PORTION 121-68-5210 i28.33 1 EA LANDSCAPE PORTION 117-69-5210-052 0.00 1 EA THANSlT FACT MAINTENANCE P0 Liquidation Amount 121-68-5210 128.33 [laim# General Description 65448PARJS/SRV P0# Stat Contnact# Immjce# lnvc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11590 V 51978 11/08/04 141.68 0.00 141.68 52181 11/2�/04 90.61 8.00 90.61 6L Distribution Gross Amount WvnA 0rdc»# ActCd Description 121-65-5210 8.00 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2004/05* PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF SMALL LANDSCAPE EQUIPMENT, TREES PORTION CCS'AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR780 � ` By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2005 09:31am Page 68 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Bates 00/00 /0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #'s 148369 to 1486.26 Payment Type Check 121 -67 -52110 32.29 1 EA COURT REFERRAL PORTION 121 -68 -5210 0.00 1 EA LANDSCAPE PORTION 117 -69- 5210 -052 0.00. 1 EA TRANSIT FACILITY MAINTENANCE Pit Liquidation Amount 121 -67 -5210 22.29 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vend# 'vendor Fume Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk hate Check Amount Sep 5215 LIFESIGNS, INC. AP 148574 01/18/05 1,525.00 Claim# General Description 65449 INTERPRETER JOSHUA RaDRIGUEZ SWIM TEAM PRACTICE PD# Stat Contract# Invoice# Irvc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 187732 11/30/04 100.00 0.00 100.00 187740 12/01/04 100.01 0.00 100.00 182119 11/29/04 125.00 0.00 125.00 182129 12/1.12/04 112.50 0.00 112.50 182133 12/03/04 112.56 0.013 112.50 179098 12/04/04 412.50 0.00 412.50 182136 12/06/04 112.50 0.00 112.50 186530 12/08/04 112.50 0.00 112.50 168100 12/07/04 112.50 0.00 112.50 18682 12/09/04 112.50 0.00 112.50 186829 12/10/04 112.50 0.00 112.50 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -72 -5000 1,525.00 INTERPETER -J RtODRIGUEZ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank C }-peck# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 6.565 MARIA BADILLtt AP 148575 01/18/05 1,5101.1.00 Maim# General Description 65490 GIFTS /CERTIFICATES EMPLY REC DINNER '05 P(14 Stat Contract# Invoice# Inve Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 10 01/17/05 1'500.00 0,00 1,5000.1-10 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 150 -00 -2176 1,500.1:10 GIFTS/CERT EMPLY REC DINNER 105 - - ---- 'CS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 HIAPR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 20L15 09:31am Page 09 jayment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 80/00/000U to 99/99Y9199 CheckAA(,-H 'o lq369 to 148626 Payment Type Check Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payer Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 617 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL AP 148576 0/18/05 12.474.578 2aim# General Description 65450 LANDSCAPE SRV (EXTRA WORK) PO# Stat Contnact# Invoics# Invc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11885 O 30591 12/31/04 1.255.0U 0.08 1 00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rdexk ActCd Description 121-68-5000 1.255.00 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2004/05* EXTRA WORK NOT COVERED BY GENERAL LANDSCAPE CONTRACT PV Liquidation �cm zon Amount �mn 121-68-5000 1.255,00 Claim# General Description ' 65451 LANDSCAPE SRV (LITTLE LEAGUES) PO# Stat Contnact# Invoice¢ Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11884 O 30590 12/31/84 M00.00 0.110 1,60.00 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rder% ActCd Description 126-68-5000-120 1,600.00 1 E *ANNUALfY200�/05*LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE FOR . LITTLE LEAGUE FIB-DS P0 Liquidation Amount 126-68-500-120 1.6110.80 ` Claimg Genera} Description 65452 LANDSCAPE SRV � ' PO# Stat comtranf# lmmice# Imc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11887 0 30587 2131/04 5,473.25 0.00 5,473.25 GL Distribution 6mso Amount Work Onder% ActCd Description 121-68-500 2^800.00 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2884/05* CITY WIDE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICE 118-68-500-056 2.673.25 i EA BUS ROUTES AND FREEWAY FRONTAGES P8 Liquidation Amount 118-68-5080-056 2.673.25 121-68-5000 2.800.00 Claim% General Description 65453 LANDSCAPE SRV SyHRE PARK PO# Stat Contract# lmmice# lnvr 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11883 0 30589 12/31/04 1.083.33 0.00 1.083.33 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0nder# ActCd Description 121-68-5008 0.00 1 EA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICE AT SYHRE PARK, STREET LIGHT/LANDSCAPE PORTION 127-68-500 1.083,33 1 EA PARKS MAINTENANCE PORTION P0 Liquidation Amount 127-6-8-5000 1.083.33 C}aim# General Description 65454 LANDSCAPE SERV IRRIGATION PO# Stat Conbact# lmmice# lmc &t Gross Amount Discount Amf Discount Used Net Amount CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 200.5 09:31am Page 70 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99Y99/9999 Chec /ACH#'a iq7A4 to 1�8626 Payment Type Check 12123 0 JU5V2 12/31/04 300.80 0.08 -300.00 30593 3U594 12/31/04 12/31/04 2.228.00 1715.00 0.00 2.228,00 0.00 135.80 GL Distribution Q- Distribution . Gross Amount Work 0»derK ActCd Description 121-66-50O0 118-68-5080-056 2.663.08 A0,00 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2084./O5* IRRIGATION REPAIRS AND RENOVATION THROUGHOUT THE CITY AND PARKS PO Liquidation Amount BY GENERAL LANDSCAPE CONTRACT 1.21-66-5000 PO Liquidation 2,663.00 Amount Claim# General Description 65455 LANDSCAPE SRV EXTRA WORK-FRWY P0 Liquidation . '. Amount 10-57-5000 27.87 Vend# Vendor Name Remitt Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7438 MOBILE MODULAR MANAGEMENT CORP AP 148578 01/18/05 360.48 'laim# General Description 65457 DEC RENTAL PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11920 0 2141500 12/20/04 76(j.48 -1 . CIO GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Opder# ActCd Description 112-215-5250 360.48 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2?004/05* MONTHLY RENTAL OF 12'X4` TRAILER FOR HOUSING OF THE GANG ACTIVITY PREVENTION UNIT P0 Liquidation Amount 112-25-5250 360.48 'CS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) R4 Sfat Cont11ant# Immice# Imc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11886 0 30595 12/31/04 A0.00 0.0O �CN.00 ' Q- Distribution . Gross Amount Work 0nden0 ActCdDescriptioo 118-68-5080-056 A0,00 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2004/05* EXTRA LANDSCAPE MAINTENA14CE SERVICE AT BUS ROUTES AND FREEWAY FRONTAGES NOT COVERED BY GENERAL LANDSCAPE CONTRACT PO Liquidation Amount _________________________________________________________________________________________________ 118-68-5001,1-856 400.00 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# ()* Date Check Amount Sep 634 MILLER'S & lSHAMS FIRE EXTINGQlSHE AP 148577 81/18/05 27.87 C]aim# General Description 65456 EXTINGUISHER SRV CALL PO4 Stat Confracf4 lnvvice# {nvc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11730 8 5377 12/27/04 27.87 030 27.87 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work Ovder# ActCd Description 10-57-5000 27.87 1 EA *ANMUAL-FY2004/05* FIRE EXTINGUISHER SERVICE FOR CITY HALL, CITY YARD & PARK BUILDINGS, GENERAL FUND PORTION 127-57-5000 O.08 1 G4 PARKS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PORTION P0 Liquidation . '. Amount 10-57-5000 27.87 Vend# Vendor Name Remitt Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7438 MOBILE MODULAR MANAGEMENT CORP AP 148578 01/18/05 360.48 'laim# General Description 65457 DEC RENTAL PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11920 0 2141500 12/20/04 76(j.48 -1 . CIO GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Opder# ActCd Description 112-215-5250 360.48 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2?004/05* MONTHLY RENTAL OF 12'X4` TRAILER FOR HOUSING OF THE GANG ACTIVITY PREVENTION UNIT P0 Liquidation Amount 112-25-5250 360.48 'CS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) �tyof Baldwin Park Jan 26, .31305 09:31am Page 71 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates OO/CR0 to 99/99/9999 Check/ACH'alq369 to 1q626 Payment Type Check Vcmd# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank0eck# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 5286 NEXTELL COMMUNICATIONS AP 148579 01/18/05 1,541.16 Claim# General Description 65458 SRV 1i/12/U4-12Yi1/U4 PO# Stat Contract* lmwice# Inm 0f Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 518397312-037 12/16/04 1,021.0 0.00 1.021.62 GL Distribution Cross Amount Work 0rden# ActCd Description 100-25-5340 1.U21.62 SRY 11/12/04-12/1i/0f 2aimW General Description 65459 SRV 11/27/04-12/2604 P0# Stat Contnact# Invvice# Imc Dt 6rvaa Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 613404029 12/31/84 519.54 0.00 519.54 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Vn6er# ActCd Description 108-25-5430 51Y.5� SRV 11/27/04-12/29/04 _--_-_--__-___---____-_----_-__--___-______________---__-___________-_-__-----___--_`____-_- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 5286 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS AP 148580 01/18/85 489.07 Y C}aim# General Description 65495 SRV 18/27/04-11/2604 A/C#61304029 PO# Stat 0mbactk lmwice# {mm Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 11/2704 ' 489.0 0.00 489.07 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Vrdev# ActCd Description 100-25-5430 469.07 10/27-11/26/04 #/C%613404029 __-___-_-______-_-_--___--____-____________--________--_-_--______----__--___-______--_ ` ' ' ' %S.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) Cityof Baldwin Park Jan 26.2005 09:31am Page 172 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check/ACH4'5 148369 to 1�8626 Payment Type Check Vend!4 Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 683 NICHOLS LUMBER & HARDWARE AP 148581 01/18K05 1.10N.24 ClaimO General Description 6546Q MISC SUPPLIES ` PO# Stat Comtoact% Immice# Inm 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11606 C 376716 11/01/04 A,05 0.00 4.05 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rdcn# ActCd Description 121-68-5210 44.85 1 EA *AN4UAL-FY2004/05* MATERIALS AND SMALL TOOLS, P0 Liquidation Amount 121-68-5210 44.05 Claim� General Description 651461 SUPPLIES PO4 Stat Conbact# Imwice# /mc 0t . Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12202 0 11/011,04 4.46 0.00 �,46 384589 11/29/04 102.10 0.00 102.10 38561� 12/01/84 23.92 0.00 23.92 385974 12/02/04 46.47 0.00 46.47 38V575Q 12/15/U4 54.10 0.08 54.10 6L Distribution 6noaa Amount Work Vrderg ActCd Description 121-68-5210 231.05 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY21104/05* MATERIALS & SMALL TOOLS ' P0 Liquidation Amount 121-68-5210 231'0 ` C}aim4 General Description 65462 MISC SUPPLIES PO4 Stat Cmtract#Invoice# . lnvc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used ' Net Amount 12122 0 38-9119 11/18/04 62.51 0.00 62.51 J�1� 11/18/04 34.82 0.00 34.82 382587 11/1004 69.71 0.00 69.71 ' 383206 11/22/04 22.14 0.00 22.14 383830 11/24/0� 31�6,14 0.00 36.14 3�1� 1��� �.� O.� �.� 38090 12/1304 18.4 0.00 18.1714 12/20/04 20.5N 0.010 20.99 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0vdev# ActCd Description 121-66-5210 295.14 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2004/05* MATERIALS AND SMALL TOOLS PV Liquidation Arriomnt 121-66-5210 295.14 Claim# General Description 65-463 MISC SUPPLIES ' PO# Stat 0mtaact# lmmice# Imc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12088 0 �4120 11/1804 62.10 0.00 0.10 �-3905 i1/2,14/04 46.52 0.00 46'52 385364 12/01/8� 115.05 0.00 115,05 385371 12/01/04 18.03 0.08 18,03 389953 12/16104 80.23 0.00 80.23 391062 12/20/04 32.42 0.00 32.42 'CS-AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 _ By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2005 09:31am Page 73 �ymentHiatory. Bank AP Payment Dates O0/Cfl)/0OC1O to 99/99/9999 Oheck/ACH 's lt'87,69 'To 148626 Payment Type Check XS.AP Accounts `Payable Release 6.1,3 N*APR700 ` By SANDRA A (SANDRA) 39*1765 12/22/04 11 7.28 0.013 17.4-18 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0nden# ActCd Description 121-67-5210 371.63 1 EA MATERIALS AND SMALL TOOLS P0 Liquidation Amount 121-67-521O 371.63 Claim# General Description 65464 SUPPLIES PO# Stat 0mtaacf# lmwice# ` Imm 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11820 0 7186185 12/03/04 158,37 0.00 158.37 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rden# ActCd Description 117-69-5218-052 158.37 1 EA *ANNUALfY2O04/05* MATERIALS & SMALLL T(0LS PV Liquidation Amount 117-64-5210-052 158.37 _-__--___-__________--___--_-_-______-__------__---__----___-_--__----______--____--_--_______ Vemd# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 687 NIXON EGLl EQUIPMENT COMPANY AP 148583* 01/18/05 3,998.45 Claim# General Description 65465 HlSC REPAIRS M% Stat ContaactK lnvo ce4 {mr Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 116�4 0 104103318 12/071'04 820.66 0.00 820.66 11141U678 12Y16/04 2.555.69 0.00 2.555.64 ` 10410751 12/28/84 622.10 0.00 622.10 11 Distribution Gross Amount Work Vrder# ActCd Description 130-58-5270 ' 3.998.�5 1 EA *AMNU&L-FY2004/05* SERVICE AND REPLACEMENT PARTS FOR jOHHSTONE STREET SWEEPERS PA Liquidation Amount 1370-58-5270 3.998.45 Vend# Vendor Name ` Remit# Payee Bank0-teck# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 410 OFFICE DEPOT, INC. AP 1�8584 0/18/05 57.8� C}aim# General Description 65470 MISC SUPPLIES PO#StatCont-ract#lnvoice# Invc Dt 6ro5s Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 267556308-001 12/13/0+ 57.84 0.00 57.84 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0nder# ActCd Description 100-21-5210 57.84 SUPPLIES XS.AP Accounts `Payable Release 6.1,3 N*APR700 ` By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2005 09.31am Page 74 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #`s 148369 to 148826 Payment Type Check Mend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 1336 OFFICEMAX -A BOISE CO AP 148585 001/18/05 2,050.82 Claim# General Description 65382 MISC SUPPLIES PJ# Stat Contract# invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11603 O 0 12/14/04 0.00 0.00 0.010 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work COrder# ActCd Description 121- 68-5210 0.00 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004/05* REPLACEMENT FAX CARTRIDGES "laim# General Description 65467 SUPPLIES -COMM FORUif PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Piet Amount 271493 11/15/04 165.86 0.00 165.86 395351 11/18/04 165.86 10.00 165.86 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 120 -v3 -5330 -030 331.72 SUPPLIES -COMM FORUM MTG :alarm# General Description 65468 MISC SUPPLIES PO# ':tat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12[25 C 434886 11/22/04 1,297.39 0.00 1,297.39 GL Distribution Gross Amount Mork Ctrder# ActCd Description 131 -14- 5210 -062 1,134.89 40 CT #P1OX9001 XEROX PAPER, 8.5X11 131 -14- 5210 -062 162.50 5 CT #P1OX90[04 XEROX PAPER, 8.5X14 PO Liquidation Amount 131 -14 -5210 -062 1,297.39 Claim# General Description 65469 MISC SUPPLIES Ptt# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 575959 11/30/04 280.17 0.010 280.17 477122 11/23/04 134.32 0.00 13432 02840 12/28/04 7.22 0.00 7.22 GL Distribution Gross Amount Wopk Order -# ActCd Description 100 -23 -5210 13432 SUPPLIES 100 - 24-5210 280.17 SUPPLIES i0U -21- 5210 7.22 '_SUPPLIES, ------------------------------------------._.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Cork Date Check Amount Sep 727 PETTY CASH AP 148586 01'18/05 748.31 Claim# General Description 65471 REPLENISH PETTY CASH PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/17'05 748.31 0.00 748.31 GL Distribution dross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -24 -5210 42.96 E DELGADO 121 -68 -5210 42.21 M ALVAREZ CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By ;SANDRA A (SANDRA) "ity of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2035 09:31am Page 75 jayment History. Bank AP Payment Dates OOX0/OC1Fj0 to 99/99/999 0eck'/A08'5 lq369 to 1�8626 Payment Type Check 111-68-5210 32.11 N ALVAREZ 100+24-52110 13,00 C KUBERRY 100-81-5330 31.04 S SALClDV 10046-5210 3.24 S AYALA 1OLI-76-521U 21.51 H HERNANDEZ 150-00-2172 42.00 A N)JO iOLI-52-5330 ' 8.80 A l0NAKl 180-24-5210 43.28 R FlNDLEY 100-24-5210 21.64 R FlN0LEY 100-24-5210 39.49 S BLACKBURN ` 101-48-5210-025 36.27 H PlCAZ0 100-72-5210 27'01 8 HERNA140EZ 10-03-5210 54.00 R RAMlREZ 108-24-5210 23.85 D REYNVSO 100+72-5210 8.64 M CA03ILLA 100-73-5210 19.99 l 6ARClA 100-57-5210 27.53 A HlCH0LS 100-45-5210 28.90 F SALCE0A 150-LILI+218T 27.96 0 REYN)S* 150-00-2154 9.05 A NAVA 100+12-5210 27.79 S CAMP 00-76-5210 10.00 HHERNANDE ' 10-73-5210 16.00 I 6ARCIA 100-03-5330 3 O.17 R RAMIREZ 100-45-5210 27.69 F SALCE0A _--_____--____---__-_--_--_______-_______---_—____-----____--___-______-_-____---__-----____- 100-81-5000 32.48 R CABALLERO Venol Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank �l ��AP Chk Date Check Amount Sep 5459 PLATINUM PLUS FOR BUSINESS 1�8587 01/18/05 1.50.70 Claiw# General Description 6549� JAN STATEMENT MARK KLlNG PU# Stat Cvntna t# Immice# {nvc 0{ Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Met Amount U 01/04/05 150.70 . 8.00 . 150,70 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Vrden4 ArtCd Description 180-23-5330 150.70 JAN-M KLIN6 ----------------------------------- Vend8 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vendor Name RemitK Payee Bank Chedk# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7589 PES GROUP INC dba: PR0TEC ENGINEER AP 148588 01/18/05 18,315.00 Claix# General Description 65472 ENGINEERING SRV P0# Stat Contracf# lmmice# {nvc Dt' Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12192 C 24070 12/28/0f 15.500.00 0.00 15.508.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rden% AcfCd Description 120-53-5020-827 15.%N.O0 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY-2'004/05* REMOVAL OF ASBESTOS AND LEAD-BASED PAINT FROM CITY AUDITORIUM, PROJECT #2804-81 128-53-5028-827 8,00 1 EA 10X CONTINGENCIES PV Liquidation Amount 120-53-50220-827 15,5(10.80 Claiw# General Description 65475 EN@ SERV 0CS.AP AcmunL's Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26.2005OY:31am Page 76 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9499 Check/ACH#'a148369 to 14860 Payment rype Check Z3.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) PO# Stat Contract#lnvoice# lnveDt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12288 0 24876 12/28/04 2.815.O8 8.80 2.815.00 6L Distribution 6r055 Amount Work 0nde»# AcfCd Description 120-53-5020-827 2.815.00 1 EA REMOVE ADDITIONAL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND TWO (2) CYCL{N0ERS CONTAINING AMONIA, CIP 827 P0 Liquidation Amount _____________________________________________________________________________________ 120-53-5020-827 2.815.00 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk. Cate Check Amount Sep 7629 PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER, INC, AP 148589 01/18/05 213.89 Claim# General Description 65474 PAPPER SPRAY STREAM PO4 Stat Cvntrac1 lnvoice% Invc 0t @msa Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 63161 12/09/04 213.89 0.08 213.8p 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rder# ActCd Description -----_------_-__-_-__--_-___--____________-----___-__-__--__------_--___-_-----_--_-__------____--__ i00-25-5218 213.89 PEPPER SPRAY Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 5969 QUEEN OF THE VALLEY DEPT #0147 AP 148590 01/18/05 332.85 Claim# General Description 65475 BLOOD ALCOHOL SCREENING T R0JAS R 06AS C 0JE0ASALDANA PON Stat Contract# lmmice# Inm 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount On, 827417 06/2604 47.55 0.00 47.55 0030093617 0Y07/04 47.55 0.8U 47.55 003027JB43O 10/14/04 47.55 0.00 47.55 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work Ord*er% ActCd Description 10-23-50LIN 47.55 R 0GAS 100-23-500 47.55 C OJEDASAL0ANA 100-23-5800 47.55 T ND#S Claim# General Description 65476 BLOOD ALCOHOL SCREENING V LOPEZ C HERNANDEZ C C0NTRERAS B AVAL0S ` PO# Stat COntr8Ct# lnvoice# lnve Ut Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 1008898322 12/13/04 47.55 . 0.00 47.55 1008719932 081111504 47.55 0.00 47.55 0029797503 06/17/04 47.55 0.08 47.55 0030090419 00/05/04 47.55 0.88 47.55 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Opden# ActCd Descriptivn 100-23-5000 47.55 V LOPEZ 100-23-5000 47.55 C HERNMAN0EZ 100-23-50U0 47.55 C CONTRERAS 1OLI-23-5000 47.55 B AVAL0S Z3.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) Otyof Baldwin Park Jan 26.2005 09:31am Page 77 'ayment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 08/00/0000 to VY/VV/YYYY C6eck/ACH#'s 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check Vendit V--ndor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Ohk Date Check Amount Sep 7630 RAQUEL THOMAS AP 1�8591 0/18/05 10.00 .,laim# General Description 65477 REFUND METROLlNK PRKG PO# Stat Contract8 Immice# lnvc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount O 01/17/05 10.00 0.00 10.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rder# ActCd Description 117-004190 10.00 REFUND ________________________________________________________________________________________ Vend# Vendor Name RemitK Payee Bank Check# Chk Dote Check Amount Sep 2519 R0BBINS PRECAST, INC AP 148592 01/18/05 3,484.64 Claim# General Description 65478 TRASH RECEPTACLES ` PO# Stat 0mbact# lmwice# Imn Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12262 C 7990 11/10K04 1,939.80 0.00 1,939.58 7991C 11/18/04 1.545.14 0.013 1,545.14 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rd er # ActCd Description 117-69-521O-052 2.800.64 34 EA DOME LID - CONTINENTAL #4455 117-69-5210-052 684.110 3 EA RECEPTACLE - NATURAL EXPOSED PO Liquidation Amount 117-69-5210-052 3.484.64 ' ___-_____---_____-__---_____----______________--_-__---_------___--_____----_--_--_----_---______ Vend# Vendor, Name Remit# Payee Bank Check8 Chk Date Check Amount Sep 6477 RU0Y CARDENA8 **VOID** AP 148593 01/18/85 350.08 Claim# General Description 65416 ENTERTAINMENT 1/21/05 EMPLY RE% DINNER PO# Stat 8mtmactk Immice# Imc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/17/05 350.00 8.00 350,00 Q- Distribution Gross Amount Work, 0rdenK ActCd Description 100-81-5330 ' �QJ0 EMPLY �I DlNNER 1/21/05 D.J. __--__-_--_-_____-_-_--_____-_--__-____--__-___-___--__---_____--_---_--__-__------__--_-----_-_-----__-__-- YendO Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7554 SAN GA0RIEL VALLEY NEWSPAPER GROUP AP 148594 01/18/05 iT4.70 Claim# General Description 65481 PUBLICATIONS F85 49/j7295 PO4 Stat 0mtract4 lmwice# Inyc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11896 0 158549 12/310/0� 88,0 0.00 88.70 197295 12/30/04 ` . 86.00 0.00 86.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Wonk 0rden# ActCd Description 1013-52-5240 174.70 i EA *ANMUAL-FY2004/05* PUBLICATIONS FOR PARCEL MAPS, TRACT MAPS, ETC. PO Liquidation Amount 100-52-5240 ' D4.70 CCS.APAccounts Payable Release 6.1]N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2005 09;31am Page 0 :1ayment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check/ACH#'s 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check Vend4 Vendor Name Remit# Payee BankCheck# OhkUate Check Amount Sep 710 SBC/PAClF]CBELL AP 1�859 01/18/05 48.89 2aimu General Description 65479 PH SRV 12/7/04-1/6/11--15 A/%# 331 254-5633 P0# Stat Confract# Invvice# Invc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 12/07/0� 48.89 0.00 48.89 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work OrdenO ActCd Description 100-25-5�30 �8.89 SRV12/7/04-01/06/05 __________________________________________________________________________________________ Vend# Vendor Nome Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 3860 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORATION 1 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORATION AP 148596 811/18/05 287.68 ' Claim# General Description 65484 SRV 1/01/05-1/31/05 PO4 Stat 0m'Uact# Tmwice# Invc 0{ Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11952 V 81012116462 01/01/05 287.68 0.00 287.68 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work Vrder# ActCd Description 100-S7-500 2O7.68 1 EA *ANHUAL-FY2004/05* MAINTENANCE OF ELEVATORS AT ` CITY HALL P0 Liquidation Amount 100-57-5008 ' 287.68 __--_ VendO Vendor Name --____--_-___-_____-_____--___-- Rrmit# Payee Bank Chech# _____-_---_---_--_ Chk Date Check Amount Sep 5791 SCHOOL TECH, INC. AP 1485q7' 01/18/05 783.22 C}aim# General Description 65482 CROSSING GUARD UNIFORM SUPPLIES PO# Stat Comtoact# lmmice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12256 C 149842 11/24104 632.0 0.00 632.70 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description ' 100-25-5210 632.70 1 EA INVOICE #149842 CROSSING GUARD UNIFORM SUPPLIES ' P0 Liquidation Amount 100-2-5210 632.70 Claim# General Description 65483 SUPPLIES PO# Sfat Contract# {mmice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 155518 12/22/04 150.52 0.00 150.52 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rden# ActCd Description 100-25-5210 150,52 SUPPLIES CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1] N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) 'ity of Ba'd �n �� �n 0, �� 0Y/�� �� 79 jaymcnt History. Bank AP Payment Dates 0K0y8000 to 99Y9Y/9999 Cherk ACH#'o 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee 7062 SELECT OFFICE SOLUTIONS Zaim# General Description 65480 COPIER MAINT (NONICA) PO# Stat 0mfrac1 lmmice# 11771 0 S82111 6L Distribution Bank0eck# Ohk Date Check Amount Sep AP IL48598 01/18/05 874.11 lmn 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12/20/04 87�.11 0.00 874.11 Gross Amount Work 0rden% ActCd Des.-ription 87�.11 1 EA *ANNUALfY2004/05* MAINTENANCE SERVICE CONTRACT INCLUDING DRUMS, DEVELOPER & TONER FOR K0NlCA 7138-2 (SERIAL F,66E1041) & K0N{CA 7022 (SERIAL 426WE21200) PO Liquidation A�U n 131-14-5260-060 874.11 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee BankCheck# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 5439 SERVICE FIRST CONTRACTORS NETWORK, AP 148599 01/1005 88.86 �laim8 General Description 65485 BULK CHOLORlNE ' PO# Stat 0mtract# Imwice4 }nvr 0t 6nvsa Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11737 0 1738 12/27/04 88.&6 0.00 88.86 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rder# ActCd Description 1�-��0� �.86 1EA*����Y2�4/0��l�IN6��B�IP�NTR6�IR P0 Liquidation Amount 127-57-5000 88.86 Vemd# Vendor, Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 6917 SAN 6A8RIEL VALLEY PAN AP 148600 01/18/05 25.80 Cloim# General Description 65442 RESERVATION SID M0USAY{ 01/26/85 PO4 Stat Comtract# lmmice# 7nvc 0t 6nvsa Amvunt` Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/17/05 25.0U 0.00 25.CH) 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work Vnder# ActCd Description __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 100-82-5330 25.00 S0 M0USAVl 01/26/05 VendK Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 779 S0. CALIF. EDIS0N ' AP 148601 01/18/05 28.042.00 '-laim# General Description 65419 SRV-ST LIGHTS P0# Stat Cvntract% Immice# Imn 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11761 O 8 01/07/05 28.042.08 0.00 28.U42.0O GL Distribution Gross Amount Work O»den% ActCd Description 121-56-5433 28.042.130 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2004/05, ENERGY COST FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND STREET LIGHTS 117-56-5433-053 0.00 1 EA ENERGY COST FOR METROLINK STATION AND PARK-N-RIDE LOTS P0 Liquidation Amount 121-56-5433 28.042.00 "CS Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N«APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) Cityof Baldwin Park Jan 26,2LIC15 09:31am Page 81 Dayment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/000000 to 99/99/9999 Check/ACH 's 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee BankOecK# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 1378 SPRINT AP 1486CF2 01/18/05 508.69 2uim# General Description 65486 SRV 11/1i/04-12Y1O/O4 PO# Stat Contract# Invoioe8 lovc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12176 V U 12/11/04 5138.69 0.80 508.69 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0nder# ActCd Description 131-14-5430-064 363.35 1 EA *A101UALfY2004/85* WIRELESS DATA ACCESS, 00E ENFORCEMENT PORTION 10242-5724-014 i45.34 1 EA HOUSING AUTHORITY PORTION P0 Liquidation Amount 10242-5724-014 145.34 , 131-14-5430-064 363.35 _-____-____--__---______----_-__-_-____-___-___--______--__-_________--_____---_-_____-_ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 6241 T-MOBILE AP 148603 01/18/05 256.72 Cloim# General Description 65487 PH SERV11/20-12/19/0164,7311/110-12/090448J7 PO# Stat ContractA lmmice# lmm 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11932 V 0 12/09/04 113,50 0.08 113.50 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rder# ActCd 0escpiptioo 108-53-5210 113.50 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2004/O"55* TELEPHONE SERVICE FOR A lDNANI P0 Liquidation Amount 1110-53-5210 113.150 'laim# General Description '5488 PH SRV 11/19-112yi8/04 ��.78 11/ 8-12/07/04 72.88 11/08-12/07/04 24.58 ' PO# Stat Combact# lmmice# lme 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12174 8 0 12Y18/04 143.22 0.00 143.22 @- Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rderO ActCd Description 131-14-6430-064 45.78 i1/1V-12/i8/04 131-14-5430-064 72.86 11/88-12/07/04 131-14-5430-064 24.58 11/08-12/87/04 PO Liquidation Amount 131-14-5430-064 143.22 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ VeodK Vendor Name Remit# Pa �� Bank Che�� �� 0ate Chpck Amount Sep 1657 Y8LANDA PERB AP 148604 01/18/055 28.00 ]aim# General Description 65437 REFUND-ADULT HIP HOP CLASS PO# S{af Comtaactk Imwice# Imm 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount U 01/17/05 20'00 0.00 20.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Orden# ActCd Description 150-00-2172 9-13. CIO REFUND ZS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1] N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) �ty of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2005 09:31am Page 82 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00V000 to 99/99/9999 Check/ACH#'a 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# GhkDute Check Amount Sep 13304SGVCITY MANAGER'S ASSOC AP 148605 01/19/05 30.00 Claim# General Description 65513 REGISTRATION SID M0USAYl 01/19/05 PO# Stat Contract8 Immice# {mn 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount O 01/19/05 38.0O 3U.00 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0ndenO ActCd Description 100-02-5330 30.00 RE6lST-SID MONSAYl 01/19/05 _______________________________________________________________________________________ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 1767 AAE INCORPORATED AP 148606 01/20/05 11.321.00 C)aim8 General Description 65511 CONSULTANT-SID M0USAVl 01/03/05-01/13/05 DEP CITY CLERK SRV 12/01/04-12/31/04 P00 Stat Contract# lovvice# lnvc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount ' 1378J 81/17/05 7,161.08 7.161.00 ' 13746 01/04/05 4.160.00 160. DO 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rder# ActCd Description 100-02-500 7.161.00 CEO 01/03/O5-81/13/05 -------__-_________-_--___-____________--_-__---____--__________--_____-_--_-___---_---____--__ 100-03-5000 4.160.00 CITY CLERK SRV 12yOi/O4-12/J1/U4 Vend4 Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# 0k Date Check Amount Sep 7463 ANNA HARRIS AP 1'f8611Op 01/20/85 75-55.91 Claim4 General Description 65496 CASE# SFBSS61350 R MARTlNB PP402 P/E: 0/15V05 ' PO# Stat Contrac t# Invoice# Invc 0{ Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount U 81/210/05 755.91 0.00 755.91 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rden# ActCd Description 100-00-2231 688.00 R NARTlNEZ PP91-12 01/15/105 ' _________________-___--_--___--______----___--___-____________-____---__--_---__-______ 1N}00+21231 67.91 R MARTlNE2 PP4U2 01/15/05 Vend4 Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 267 COURT TRUSTEE ' AP 148611 01120105 586.48 Claim# Genera] Description 65497 0SE# GD0N20433A LOPEZ PP#02P/E: 01/1505 ' PO# Stat Contnact# Immice# Invc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/28/05 586.48 0.00 .586.48 GL Distribution ' Gross Amount Work Opderg ActCd Description ` 100-08-2231 526.48 A LOPEZ PP#02 P/E/ 01/1505 ��.AP Accounts Payable Release 6,1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2005 89'31am Page 83 Payment History. Bank, AP Payment Dates 00/00/01300 to 99/99/9999 Check/ACH#'a 14-8369 to 14806 Payment Type Check __ Vemd# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank CheckK Chk Date Check Amount Sep 267 COURT TRUSTEE AP 148612 81/20/05 207.76 Y Claim# Genera] Description 654980SE# BY059077J8ANCHEZPP#0201/15/05 PO# Stat Confnoct# lnvvice# lnvc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/20105 207.76 0.00 207.76 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work Vnder# ActCd Description 10-011-2231 207.76 J SANCHB PP#02 81/15/05 __________________________________________________________________________________________________ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 71,199 DORENE GARAY AP 1+8613 01/0/05 458.00 Claim# General Description 6509 CASE# 198989 H GARAY PP#02 P/E: 01/15/85 PO# Stat 0mtmct¢ lmmice# Imc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/20y05 450.80 0.00 450.80 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rdcrg ActCd Description 100+0-21,31 450,00 H GARAY P10402 P/E: 01/15/05 _-_---__-__--_____--___--________-_-________-__--_--_-__-_-___________--_____---__-___--_- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 6443 F&A FEDERAL CREDIT UNION AP 148614 01/20/05 2.475.00 Claim# General Description 65500 EMPLY REC DINNER '05 225 AMC-NOVIE TICKETS 225 REGAL-MOVIE TICKETS PO# Stat Combact8 Innice# Imc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount U 01/20/05 2,475.013 0.00 2.475.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 150-0-2176 2.475.00 pNY{[ TICKETS-EMPYY REC DINNER '05 ______--_-_-_---___-____--__---_--____------_-__-___-_____-_-______-__________---_-__-___----_ Vend4 Vendor Name RemitA Payee Bank Check# 0k Date Check Amount Sep 6565 MARIA BA@lLL0 AP 1�8615 01/20/05 134.86 Claim# General Description 65501 GIFTS/CERTIFICATES ENPLY RE% DINNER '05 PO# Stat Contract# Immice# lnvc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/20/05 134.86 0. 00 134.86 @- Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rdcr# ActCd Description 150-0-2176 134.86 GlFTS/CERT EMPLY DlNINER '05 ____-_____--_____--____-______---__---___------____--________--_____-____-_-_-___---______- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee' Dank 0eck# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 5286 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS AP 148616 01/20105 545.610 Y ClaimK General Description 65466 SRV 12/84/04-01/03/05 P8# Stat Contruct4 invoice% lnvc 0{ Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 111757 0 862686311-03 01/08/05 545.60 0.80 545.60 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rdcr# ActCd Description 100-57-5210 163.70 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY20A/05* CELLULAR PHONES FOR PUBLIC CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR708 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) Cityof Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2005 09:31am P8ge 84 layment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 C1-k-ck/ACH#'s148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check WORKS DEPARTMENT, MAINTENANCE ADMIN PORTION 114-61-5210-894 38.19 1 EA ASPHALT PORTION 117-69'5210-052 38.19 1 EA TRANSIT FACILITY MAlNT PORTION 118-64-5210-056 76.38 1 EA GRAB PORTION 121-67-5210 38.1; 1 EA COURT REFERRAL PORTION 121-68-5210 76.38 1 EA LANDSCAPE PORTION 129-54-5210-873 76.38 i EA NAlNT ADMIN/ENVlRNVMENTAL SERV PORTION 130-58-5210 38.19 1 EA FLEET SERV PORTION PO Liquidation Amount 100-57-5210 163.70 ' 114-61-5210-094 38.19 117-69-5210-052 38.19 118-64-5210-056 76.38 121-67-5210 38.19 121-68-5218 76.38 129-54-5210-873 76.38 150-58-5210 38.19 -----__-_-___- -___--__-_--__-____-_-__-_--_-___--_-___-_--___--_-_---_---__-____-__-________-_ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 6122 PATRICIA ARTEAGA AP 148617 01120105 2215.80 Claim# General Description ' ` 65502 CAS[# KD845836 A RAMlREZ PP#02 01/15/05 PO# Stot Conh.act# Immice# Inve 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount O 01/20/05 225.00 0.00 225.0) 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work Vndcr# ActCd Description 100-00-2231 ___--__-__--____-_-----_-------_------_-------_-_--__-_____--_------_-__--_______-----__-_---__--__---____ 225.00 A RAMIREZ PPtG2 01/15/05 Vpnd# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Chezk# CJ-fk Date Check Amount Sep 864 PERS-RETIREMENT AP 148618 01/2U/05 2.824.82 Claim# General Description 65503 PART-TIME PERS PP#20 P/E/ 89/25/04 SVC PER. 09-04-4 PO# Stat Comtract# lmmice# Imm Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount U 01/20/05 2.824.82 0.00 2,824.82 Q- Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rdev% ActCU Description 100-00-2205 2.730.89 P/T PP#2O P/E: 9/25/04 SRY 09-04-4 100+0-2223 . _____________________________________________________________________________________ 93.93 P/T PP#20 P/E: 9/23/04 SR; 09-04-4 Veod# Vendor Name Remi(# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 864 PERS-RETIREMENT AP 148619 01/20/05 1.980.08 Y Claim� General Description 65504 PART-TIME PERS PP#01 P/E/ 01/01/05 SVC PER: 01-05-3 PO# Stat Comtract# lmmice# lmm Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount U 01/2005 1.98r.m 0.00 1.980.08 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rden# ActCd Description 10-00-2205 1.906.01 P/T PP#01 P/E: 01/01/05 SRV 01-05-3 100-00-2223 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ 737.47 P/T PP901 P/E: 01/01/05 SRV 01-08-3 DCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR00 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) CityofBaldNinPark Jan 2h.2CIL15 09:31am Page 85 »ayment History. Bank AP Payment Dotes OU/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check/ACH#'s 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check Vend# Vendor Name Remit#Payee Bank Check C-ik Date Check Amount Sep 6477RUDYCARDENAS AP 148620 01/20/05 450.00 Claim% General Description 65505 DJ-Fj1PLY REC DINNER '05 01/21/85 PO# Stat Contnacf# /nvoice% lnvc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/20V05 450.00 0.00 450,00 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work Vnden# ActCd Description 180-81-5330 450.08 DJ EMPLY REC DINNER '05 ______________________________________________________________________________________ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Cherk# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 4185 S'AN BERNAR0{N0 CHILD SUPPORT PMTS AP 148621 01/20/05 25.80 Claim# General Description 65506 CASE# 000037793 G FIERRV PF#02 P/E: 01/15/05 PV# Stat Cvntnact# Invoicc8 lnvc 0t 6r055 Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/20/05 25.00 8.00 25.00 @- Distribution 6nma Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100-00-2231 25.00 6 FIERRO PP482 01/15/85 -_-___---__-__-___-_---______--_---_--____-_____--___-_--_____--__-___-_____---________-_----___- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank CheckM Chk Date Check Amount Sep 186 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EMPLOYMENT DEV AP 148622 01/20/05 14,789.72 Claim# General Description 65508 ST TAX 0EP PP#02 R/E: 01/15/105 (INCL: BI-WKLY & SEMI-MO) PO# Stat Dmhart# Immice# Imc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/20/0-5 14.789.72 0. 00 14.789.72 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0vder# ActCd Description 10-00-2221 14,762.86 PP#02 P/E: 01/15/05 Dl-WKLY/SEMI-MV 100-00-2221 26.86 ` PP#02 P/E: 01/15/05 B{-WKLY/SEMI-M0 _-_---____-__-__-____-----_____----____---___--__---__-_-___--_-_______---___-_-____--__--_-_____-_ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Chedk# Chk Dote Check Amount Sep 856 VICTORIA VALYER0E AP 148623 01/20/05 650.00 Claim# General Description 65587 iOO IN-N-,'-)UT GIFT CERT & TABLE DECORATIONS PO# Stat 0mtmcf# Invoice% }nvc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/20/05 650.00 0.00 650,0U 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0nder# ActCd Description 100-81-530 650,00 IN-N+0T CERT/DEC0RATlONS EMMY REC '05 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3M*APR700 ` By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Jan 26, 2005 09c31am Page 86 Payment History. Punk AP Payment Dates 00100/0000 to 99/99/9999 Checl, /ACH #`s 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Banff, Check# Chk Date Check. Amount Sep 7132 CRYSTAL BY DESIGN CO. INC. AP 148624 01/20/15 8731 Claim# General Description' 65512 EMPLY RECOGNITION CLOCK Pt)# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 19860 01/05/05 87.31 87. GL Distribution Gross Amount Work O -Pder# ActCd Description 100 -72 -5210 87.31 EMPLY REC CLOCK Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount 'Sep 6471 CALNENA AP 14865 01/24/05 195.00 Claim# General Description 655:10 ANNUAL CONFERENCE 01/31/05 - 02/02/05 PD# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/24/05 195.00 195.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Opder# ActCd Description 100 -25 -5330 195.60 ANNUAL CONF 01/31/05-02/02/5 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Chen;# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 6690 NATIONAL EMERGENCY NUMBER ASSN AP 148626 01/24/05 95.00 Maim# General Description 65509 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Inve Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/24/05 95.00 95.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100- 25 -52 O 95.00 MEMBERSHIP CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park .ien 26, 2005 09.31am Page 87 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9949 Check /ACH #`s 148369 to 148626 Payment Type Check : Pa i d Checks: Blank a urosel omitted: es P g 15 9 Non— issued "VOID" checks: }Lech Count 244 9, 27, 66, 80 87 148370 Check Total 928,115.17 148371 0 Liquidation Total 626,406.32 148377 Backup Withholding Total 0.00 148393 148402 'Paid by ACHa 148438 - 148439 ACH Count 0 148441 ACH Total 0.00 148504 PO Liquidation Total 0.00 148506 3ackup Withholding Total 0.00 148547 148582 Total Payments; 148593 Payment Count 244 148607- 148609 Payment Total 928,115.17 PO Liquidation Total 626,406.32 Backup Withholding Total 0.00 Void Checks: Check Count 0 "heck Total 0.00 PCB Liquidation Total 0.00 3ackup Withholding Total 0.00 "'CS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) Requested By List of Honorees Time /Date /Place of Presentation Date Needed BPACE Baldwin Park Adult and 7:00 pm, Wednesday, Proclamation Community Education February 16, 2005 Program observing City Council Meeting California Adult Education Week The following emergency requests for plaques and certificates were approved by the Interim Chief Executive Officer and have been ordered and /or prepared: RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the preparation and presentation of the above plaque. Prepared By: Sharon Thompson, Executive Secretary to CEO 2 Time/Date/Place of Date Needed Requested By List of Honorees Presentation Councilmember Honorable Bill Lockyer 12:00 noon Plaque Olivas California. State Attorney Wednesday 1/25/05 General January 26, 2005 Courtyard Marriott Employee John Wood, Retiree 7:00 pm, Friday, Plaque Recognition January 21, 2005 1/21/05 Dinner Courtyard Marriott Committee Employee Contributors to Employee 7:00 pm, Friday, Certificates Recognition Recognition Dinner January 21, 2005 2/2/05 Dinner Courtyard Marriott Committee RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the preparation and presentation of the above plaque. Prepared By: Sharon Thompson, Executive Secretary to CEO 2 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FEB 2 e ITEM NO. ,® CITY OF BALD IN PARK STAFF REPORT BALDWIN P A,R K TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Jack Wong, Director of Com evelopment and Housing DATE: February 2, 2005 SUBJECT: Independent Cities Lease Finance Authority Agreement (ICLFA) PURPOSE To provide the City Council with an overview of the Independent Cities Lease Finance Authority Agreement (ICLFA) Homebuyer Assistance Program. BACKGROUND /DISCUSSION The ICLFA oversees the program for the National Homebuyers Fund (NHF). The NHF has three different types of down payment and closing costs programs; 1) The Access Program, 2) NHF Gold Program, and 3) First House Program. Each program can be used in conjunction with the City programs, however, they all require the City to take a third position to their second mortgage loan. Attached is the brochure with the program details. Below are the basic details to the NHF programs: • Funds to be used for down payment and closing costs. • Loans are provided in the form of a 20 year term Second Mortgage. • Fixed Interest Rate (currently at 8 %), amortized monthly (will be included into the first loan payment). • May assist up to 7% of sales price. • NHF approved lenders, Countrywide and City Mortgage, must be utilized. • Program is not restricted to low income buyers. The maximum income level is moderate- income (120 %-140% of the median income). However, if the City program is used in conjunction with the NHF, the most restrictive requirements will be met. • Lenders also have specific first loan interest rate which varies with each program • In order to utilize City's loan programs, the NHF Lenders must approve the City's programs. (Both lenders are currently reviewing the new City guidelines approved by the City Council on January 5, 2005). • City staff does not administer these programs. Although City staff does not directly administer this program, brochures are provided to interested homebuyers along with information regarding the City's other programs, which includes the City's First Time Homebuyer Program and the Lease to Purchase program. Because the City acts only as a referral center for this program, it is difficult to estimate the number of residents who have contacted the NHF. However, staff contacted the NHF and was informed that 22 people purchased a home in the City of Baldwin Park using the NHF program in the last three years (14 in 2002, 7 in 2003 and 1 in 2004). RECOMMENDATION The City Council is requested to receive and file this report. CITY COUNCIL AGENR FEB 2 CITY OF BALDWIN PARK CONSENT I4 BALDIN P . A , R. K TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Mark Kling, Chief of Police �Poc DATE`: February 2, 2005 SUBJECT: TERMINATION OF THE CURRENT HELICOPTER AGREEMENT AND THE INITIATION OF A NEW AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF EL MONTE Purpose The purpose of this report is to request Council approval for the termination of the current contractual agreement, and the initiation of a new one, between the City of Baldwin Park and the City of El Monte, for the delivery of helicopter services. Background /Discussion This item was presented to Council at the January 19, 2005, City Council meeting and carried over to this meeting. The City of Baldwin Park currently receives helicopter services through a contractual agreement with the City of El Monte. The specifications of the existing contract provide for a shared use and shared expense operation between the cities of Baldwin Park, El Monte, and Montebello. The helicopter has proven itself to be a substantial resource in the prevention and suppression of criminal activity, provides unequaled coverage in area searches, is highly effective in rapid responses to calls for service, and is a significant asset in maintaining the safety and security of our citizens. The new agreement allows the City of Baldwin Park 10 days from date of receipt to issue a written objection to El Monte's certificate of insurance. If the City of Baldwin Park does not object within 10 days, the insurance certificate maintained by the City of El Monte will be accepted in full. Also, the City of El Monte has added a requirement that the City of Baldwin Park provide either a Tactical Flight Officer or a Pilot to the program. The previous contract only required a Tactical Flight Officer. This is not a concern as we still have the option of only providing a Tactical Flight Officer. The City Attorney has approved the contract as to form and content. Helicopter Agreement/ Prepared by Sgt. D. Reynoso Page 9 of 1 Fiscal Impact Pursuant to the provision of the proposed contractual agreement, the City of Baldwin Park would continue to remit a flat rate of $67,500 per year with no change in the terms of the contract. This is a budgeted item that is already included in the FY 2004/05 "police budget in cost center 106.25.5000. Recommendation 1. Staff recommends that council terminate the existing contractual agreement, and approve the new agreement between the City of Baldwin Park and the City of El Monte for the delivery of helicopter services. 2. Direct the Chief Executive Officer to obtain necessary signatures for execution of the agreement. Attachments • City of El Monte Certificate of Insurance • Amended Helicopter Agreement Helicopter Agreement/ Prepared by Sgt. D. Reynoso Page 2 oft This policy is issued by NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA 70 PINE STREET NEW YORK, NY 10270 PART 2 DECLA TIONS Policy Number AV 3224873 -10 Previous Policy Number AV 3224873 -09 This page with "Policy Provisions -- Part 1" Form CAV01 (1/01) and all endorsements attached hereto completes this numbered aviation physical damage and liability policy, issued by the company as indicated above (hereinafter called the Company), ITEM 1. NAMED INSURED CITY OF EL MONTE ADDRESS 11333 VALLEY BLVD. EL MONTE, CA 91731 ITEM 2. Policy Period: From MAY 19. 2004 to MAY 19, 2005 12 :01 A.M. Standard Time at the address in Item 1. The insurance afforded is only with respect to such and so many of the following coverages as are indicated by specified premium charge or charges. The limit of the Company's liability against such coverage shall be as stated herein, subject to all of the terms of this policy having reference thereto. If more than one aircraft is insured hereunder, the terms of this policy shall apply separately to each. ITEM 3. Liability Coverages LIMITS OF LIABILITY LIABILITY PREMIUMS A. Bodily InjuI)t — exQluding Passengers ('- assenger Liability D. Single Limit -- Including Passengers with Passenger Liability limited integially too X X X X 500,000, 5,000,000. X X X X 50,850. LIAB. TOTAL $ 50,890. ITEM 4. Description of Aircraft and Physical Damage Coverage hereunder: DEDUCTIBLES F.A.A. CERT. No MAKE AND MODEL YEA I BUIL FATS INSURED VALUE PHYSICAL DAMAGE COV. PHYSICAL DAMAGE PREMIUMS NOT IN MOTION IN MOTION, INGESTION, OR MOORING crew pass N171WO ROBINSON 1997 1 * N/A ROBINSON R -44 1200.11 1 3 PHYSICAL DAMAGE Coverage Identified F. All Risks: Ground & Flight. * NOT COVERED G. All Risks: Not In Flight. H. All Risks: Not In Motion, PHYSICAL DAMAGE TOTAL $ N/A POLICY PREMIUM $ 50 890. ITEM 5. When in flight the aircraft will be operated only by pilots meeting the requirements endorsed in this policy. ITEM 6. The aircraft will be used only for the purposes indicated by "X" below (see Definitions). "PLEASURE AND BUSINESS" I El " CHARTER/ AtIZTAXI I "COMMERCIAL" X I AS ENDORSED HEREON ITEM 7. The Named Insured is and shall remain the sole owner of the aircraft and the aircraft is not subject to any encumbrance other than as indicated herein. Endorsements and forms forming a part of this policy on its effective date: CAV01(1 /01), AV347, AV122, AV117, AV27, AV16, AV118, AV67, AV12, AV02, AV07, AV33, AV882, AVN48B, AV856, AVN46B, AVN38B, SE52133, 71223 Producer MARSH RISK INSURANCE SERVICES. ONE CALIFORNIA STREET SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111 M00250 Countersigned .+o At Approved By (Authorized Representative) By Date of Issue May 4, 2004 (MA i ut onzo presen ateve CAV04 (1/01) - 1 PILOT WARRANTY ENDORSEMENT This policy is amended as follows: it is a condition of this insurance that when in flight, the aircraft will be operated only by pilot(s) specified below. ROBERT W. MUSE ROBERT DEAN MCCLUNG, JR. JEFFERY A. GIRGLE GARY FRANCIS HAIDET CARL HOWARD GARLICK ANY PILOT PROPERLY CERTIFIED AND APPROVED BY THE CHIEF PILOT OF THE NAMED INSURED OR HIS /HER DESIGNEE. All other provisions of this policy remain the same. This endorsement becomes effective MAY 19, 2004 to be attached to and hereby made a part of Policy No. AV 3224873 -10 issued to CITY OF EL MONTE By NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA Endorsement No. 1 Date of issue May 4, 2004 (MA) By (Authorized Representative) AV347 (1/01) PURPOSE OF USE ENDORSEMENT This policy is amended as follows: The Purpose of Use set forth in the Declarations is completed as follows: AS RESPECTS AIRCRAFTS N171 WC AND N544PD Purpose of Use shall be only as follows: "AS REQUIRED BY THE NAMED INSURED All other provisions of this policy remain the same. This endorsement becomes effective MAY 19, 2004 to be attached to and hereby made a part of Policy No. AV 3224873 -10 issued to CITY OF EL MONTE By NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA Endorsement No. 2 +-� --�— Date of Issue May 4, 2004 (MA) By (Authorized Representative) AV122 (1/01) POUCY TERRITORY ENDORSEMENT In consideration of an additional premium of $ INCLUDED , this policy is amended as follows: The POLICY PERIOD, TERRITORY INSURING AGREEMENT is amended to read as follows: (Only the clause(s) indicated by an "X" shall apply.) ❑ Worldwide ❑ Western Hemisphere Excluding ALASKA AND HAWAII. All other provisions of this policy remain the same. This endorsement becomes effective MAY 19, 2004 to be attached to and hereby made a part of Policy No. AV 3224873 -10 issued to CITY OF EL MONTE By NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA Endorsement No. 3 Date of Issue May 4, 2004 (MA By (Authorized Representative) AV117 (12/03) CANCELLATION CLAUSE AMENDMENT ENDORSEMENT This policy is amended as follows; This policy may be cancelled by the Named Insured by mailing to the Company, or the Aviation Managers, written notice stating when thereafter such cancellation shall be effective. This policy may be cancelled by the Company or the Aviation Managers, by mailing to the Named Insured at the address shown in this policy written notice stating when not less than 60 days (ten (10) days if for non- payment of premium) thereafter such cancellation shall be effective. The mailing of notice as aforesaid shall be sufficient proof of notice and the effective date and hour of cancellation stated in the notice shall become the end of the policy period. Delivery of such written notice, either by the Named Insured, the Company or the Aviation Managers shall be equivalent to mailing. If the Named Insured cancels, earned premium shall be computed in accordance with the customary short rate table and procedure. If the Company or the Aviation Managers cancel, earned premium shall be computed pro rata. Premium adjustment may be made at the time cancellation is effective and, if not then made, shall be made as soon as practicable after cancellation becomes effective. The Company's or the Aviation Managers' check or the check of their representative mailed or delivered as aforesaid shall be sufficient tender of any refund of premium due to the Named Insured. All other provisions of this policy remain the same. This endorsement becomes effective MAY 19, 2004 to be attached to and hereby made a part of Policy No. AV 3224873 -10 issued to CITY OF EL MONTE By NATIONAL. UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA Endorsement No. 4 Date of Issue May 2004 (MA By (Authorized Representative) AV27 (1/0-1) AUTOMATIC ATTACHMENT ENDORSEMENT FOR NEWLY ACQUIRED AIRCRAFT This policy is amended as follows: 1, Coverages D & E shall attach with respect to PISTON ROTOR WING AIRCRAFT having a designed seating capacity of no more than 4 total seats acquired by the Insured, as owner or exclusive lessee, during the policy term provided that the Company is advised of the full particulars within 30 days of acquisition and the applicable premiums paid therefor. 2. As respects Physical Damage coverages: (a) The insured value of such aircraft shall be the actual price paid including engine(s) as evidenced by the records of the Insured unless a different value is accepted by the Company after notification as required above. (b) The maximum amount of insurance automatically provided for any one aircraft shall not exceed $ NOT COVERED ; and in the event an acquired aircraft shall have a value in excess of this amount, the Company shall not be liable in the event of loss for an amount greater than the percentage this limit bears to the actual value unless such actual value shall have been specifically approved on the particular aircraft by the Company in writing. (c) The amount of insurance automatically provided hereunder is subject to deductibles of: Not in Motion $ NOT COVERED In Motion, Ingestion, $ NOT COVERED or Mooring 3. Item 1. of this endorsement shall not apply to, and Coverages NOT APPLICABLE shall not automatically attach, with respect to any aircraft scheduled below: Schedule: 4. The AUTOMATIC INSURANCE FOR NEWLY ACQUIRED AIRCRAFT SPECIAL INSURING AGREEMENT set forth in the policy is hereby deleted. All other provisions of this policy remain the same. This endorsement becomes effective MAY 19, 2004 to be attached to and hereby made a part of Policy No. AV 3224873 -10 issued to CITY OF EL MONTE By NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA Endorsement No. 5 Date of Issue May4, 2004 (_MA } By (Authorized Representative) AV 1 G (1/01) PREMISES AMENDMENT ENDORSEMENT In consideration of additional premium of $ INCLUDED this policy is amended as follows: The definition of Premises set forth in the policy is deleted and replaced with the following: "Premises" means such portions of airports as are designated and used for the parking or storage of aircraft inclusive of premises owned, operated or maintained by the Insured. However, the insurance provided by this endorsement shall be secondary to and excess over any other valid and collectible insurance available to the Insured. All other provisions of this policy remain the same, This endorsement becomes effective MAY 19, 2004 to be attached to and hereby made a part of Policy No. AV 3224873 -10 issued to CITY OF EL MONTE By NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA Endorsement No. 6 . Date of Issue _ _ May 4, 2004 (MA By (Authorized Representative) AV 118 (1/01) HOST LIQUOR LIABILITY This policy is amended as follows: The Company will promptly pay on behalf of the Insured all sums which the Insured becomes legally obligated to pay as damages because of bodily injury or property damage caused by an occurrence during the policy period arising out of the serving or giving of alcoholic beverages at or from the Insured °s premises or any aircraft covered by this policy. The insurance provided by this coverage section is excess insurance. The Limit of Liability with respect to coverage provided by this endorsement is $ 1,000,000. aggregate. All other provisions of this policy remain the same. This endorsement becomes effective MAY 19, 2004 to be attached to and hereby made a part of Policy No. AV 3224873 -10 issued to CITY OF EL MONTE By NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA Endorsement No. 7 Date of Issue May 4, 2004 (MA) By (Authorized Representative) AV67 (1/01) LAY -UP RETURN ENDORSEMENT In the event of an aircraft insured in this policy being laid up and not in use for any purpose, the in motion coverage under all sections of this policy will be suspended during the period of such lay -up and credit will be allowed upon expiration of the policy, subject to the following conditions: 1. Notice must be furnished by the Insured to the Company prior to commencement of, and also upon termination of, the lay -up. 2. No return of premium shall be made: (a) for the period of any "Annual", "100 Hour ", or "Progressive" inspection for renewal of the Certificate of Airworthiness; (b) unless the period of lay -up is of at least 30 consecutive days, but should the period defined in (a) occur during lay -up then the Insured shall be entitled to add the lay -up days prior to and subsequent to which a return may be made; (c) if any claim in respect of the aircraft concerned has been made on this insurance. But, this condition (c)_ shall not apply in the event such claim is not covered under the policy to which this endorsement is attached. Subject always to the foregoing conditions, the return premium shall be equal to 100 % of the pro rata of the difference between the annual full flight premium and the annual ground risk premium for the actual period of lay -up as defined above: For the purpose of this endorsement, the annual ground risk premium shall be computed based on the following rates: Physical Damage Rates N/A Annual Liability Premium $ *40 % OF LIABILITY PREMIUM In the event of the aircraft being laid up for a period of at least 30 consecutive days of which only a part of those days attaches to this insurance and part to the annual renewal, then the Aviation Managers shall return premium for those days for which coverage was suspended. All other provisions of this policy remain the same. This endorsement becomes effective MAY 19, 2004 to be attached to and hereby made a part of Policy No. AV 3224873 -10 issued to CITY OF EL MONTE By NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA Endorsement No. 8 Date of Issue _ May 4, 2004 (MA) By (Authorized Representative) AV12 (1101) ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENT This policy is amended as follows: (Only the clause(s) indicated by an "X" shall apply.) ❑ The scheduled persons or organizations are included as additional Insured. ❑ The scheduled persons or organizations are the registered owner of and are included as additional Insured. ❑ The scheduled persons or organizations are included as additional Insured but only as respects liability coverages The scheduled persons or organizations are included as additional Insured under liability coverages, but only as respects operations of the Named Insured. ❑ The scheduled persons or organizations are included as additional Insured but only as respects operations of the Named Insured. ❑ Workmanship Exclusion - Coverage does not apply to any occurrence arising from the design, manufacture, modification, repair, sale, or servicing of the aircraft other than ground handling. Schedule: Name CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, ATTN: POLICE DEPARTMENT Address 14403 PACIFIC AVENUE BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 Name CITY OF IRWINDALE, ATTN: POLICE DEPARTMENT Address 5050 IRWINDALE AVENUE IRWINDALE, CA 91706 Name CITY OF MONTEBELLO, ATTN: POLICE DEPARTMENT Address 1600 BEVERLY BOULEVARD MONTEBELLO, CA 90640 All other provisions of this policy remain the same. This endorsement becomes effective MAY 19, 2004 to be attached to and hereby made a part of Policy No. AV 3224873 -10 issued to CITY OF EL MONTE By NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA Endorsement No, 9 Date of Issue May 4, 2004 (MA) By (Authorized Representative) AV02 (7/03) AIR AMBULANCE CLAUSE This policy is amended as follows: While the aircraft is used for (a) air ambulance or (b) the transportation of cadavers or body organs, tissues, or fluids (including derivatives thereof) this policy shall not apply to and the Company shall not be liable for any: A) Claims resulting from bodily injury or property damage due to: i) The rendering of or failure to render a) medical, surgical, dental, x -ray, or nursing service or treatment, massage, physiotherapy, chiropractic, hearing aid, optical, optometrical services or treatments or the furnishing of food or beverages in connection therewith; b) any professional service, test or treatment conducive to health or of a professional nature; c) any cosmetic or tonsorial service or treatment. ii) The handling or furnishing of body organs, body_ tissue, or fluids (including derivatives thereof) or the handling, furnishing or dispensing of drugs or medical, dental, or surgical supplies or appliances or equipment. iii) The handling of or performing of autopsies on cadavers. iv) The aggravation of existing injuries, unless arising out of an occurrence involving the covered aircraft. B) Legal obligation of the Insured to pay any sum as damages because of mental anguish arising out of the transportation of cadavers, body organs, tissue or fluids (including derivatives thereof). C) Damage to any cadaver, body organ, tissue or fluids (including derivatives thereof) is deemed to be property damage and is not covered herein. All other provisions of this policy remain the same. This endorsement becomes effective MAY 19, 2004 to be attached to and hereby made a part of Policy No'. AV 3224873 -10 issued to CITY OF EL MONTE By NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA Endorsement No. 10 Date of Issue May 4, 2004 (MA } By (Authorized Representative) AV07 (9/99) CONSEQUENTIAL LOSS EXCWSION This policy will not cover any claim for damages arising from, or in consequence of interruption of service from the following: A) Power transmission lines B) Television broadcasting C) Radio broadcasting D) Microwave transmissions E) Telegraph or telephone transmission lines F) Gas, steam, oil or any other instruments of power or fluid transmissions This policy also excludes any loss arising or in consequence of changes or variations in such transmission. All other provisions of this policy remain the same. This endorsement becomes effective MAY 19, 2004 to be attached to and hereby made a part of Policy No. AV 3224873 -10 issued to CITY OF EL MONTE By NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA Endorsement No. 11 Date of Issue _ May 4, 2004 (MA By (Authorized Representative) AV33 (8/99) ASBESTOS EXCLUSION ENDORSEMENT This policy does not cover any claims'of any kind whatsoever directly or indirectly relating to, arising out of or in consequence of: 1. The actual, alleged or threatened exposure to or presence of asbestos in any form whatsoever, including, but not limited to, asbestos fibers or asbestos dust, or any material or product containing, or alleged to contain, asbestos; or 2. Any obligations, request, demand, order, or statutory or regulatory requirement that any Insured or others test for, monitor, clean up, remove, contain, treat, neutralize, protect against or in any other way respond to the actual, alleged or threatened exposure to or presence of asbestos in any form whatsoever, including, but not limited to, asbestos fibers or asbestos dust, or any material or product containing, or alleged to contain, asbestos. However, the exclusion shall not apply to any claim for asbestos exposure caused by or resulting from a crash, fire, explosion, or collision or a recorded in flight emergency causing abnormal aircraft operations. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Policy, Insurers will have no duty to investigate, defend or pay defense costs in respect of any claim excluded in whole or in part under paragraphs 1. or 2. hereof. All other provisions of this policy remain the same. This endorsement becomes effective MAY 19, 2004 to be attached to and hereby made a part of Policy No. AV 3224873 -10 issued to CITY OF EL MONTE By NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA Endorsement No. 12 Date of Issue May 4, 2004 (MA By (Authorized Representative) AV882 (3104) WAR, H1- JACKING AND OTHER PERILS EXCLUSION CLAUSE (AVIATION) This policy is amended as follows: In the event any of the provisions of this endorsement are in conflict with any provisions, exclusions, conditions or terms forming part of this policy, this endorsement shall take precedence. This policy does not cover claims caused by: (a) War, invasion, acts of foreign enemies, hostilities (whether war be declared or not), civil war, rebellion, revolution, insurrection, martial law, military or usurped power or attempts at usurpation of power; (b) Any hostile detonation of any weapon of war employing atomic or nuclear fission and /or fusion or other like reaction or radioactive force or matter; (c) Strikes, riots, civil commotions or labor disturbances; (d) Any act of one or more persons, whether or not agents of a sovereign power, for political or terrorist purposes and whether the loss or damage resulting therefrom is accidental or intentional; (e) Any malicious act or act of sabotage; (f) Confiscation, nationalization, seizure, restraint, detention, appropriation, requisition for title or use by or under the order of any Government (whether civil, military or de facto) or public or local authority; (g) Hijacking or any unlawful seizure or wrongful exercise of control of the aircraft or crew in flight (including any attempt at such seizure or control) made by any person or persons on board the aircraft acting without the consent of the Insured. Furthermore, this policy does not cover claims arising whilst the aircraft is outside the control of the Insured by reason of any of the above perils. The aircraft shall be deemed to have been restored to the control of the Insured on the safe return of the aircraft to the Insured at an airfield not excluded by the geographical limits of this policy, and entirely suitable for the operation of the aircraft (such safe return shall require that the aircraft be parked with engines shut down and under no duress). All other provisions of this policy remain the same. This endorsement becomes effective MAY 19, 2004 to be attached to and hereby made a part of Policy No. AV 3224873 -10 issued to CITY OF EL MONTE By NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA Endorsement No. 13 Date of Issue —May 4, 2004 (MA By (Authorized Representative) AVN48B (1 /02) TERRORISM EXCLUSION (Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002) This policy is amended as follows: This policy does not cover claims caused by any losses, damages, or injuries arising directly or indirectly as a result of a certified "Act of Terrorism" defined by Section 102. Definitions of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 and any revisions or amendments. Solely with respect to this endorsement and to ensure compliance with the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002, an "Act of Terrorism" shall mean: (1) Act of Terrorism: (A) Certification' The term "act of terrorism" means any act that is certified by the Secretary of the Treasury of the United States, in concurrence with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General of the United States: (i) to be an act of terrorism; (ii) to be a violent act or an act that is dangerous to: (1) human life; (II) property; or (III) infrastructure; (iii) to have resulted in damage within the United States or outside of the United States in the case of: (1) an air carrier or commercial vessel defined as one principally based in the United States, on which United States income tax is paid, and Whose insurance coverage is subject to regulation in the United States; (11) the premises of a United States mission; and (iv) to have been committed by an individual(s) acting on behalf of any foreign person or interest, as part of an effort to coerce the civilian population of the United States or to influence the policy or affect the conduct of the United States Government by coercion. (B) Limitation - No act shall be certified by the Secretary as an act of terrorism if: (i) the act is committed as,part of the course of war declared by the Congress, except that this clause shall not apply with respect to any coverage for workers' compensation; or (ii) property and casualty insurance losses resulting from the act, in the aggregate, do not exceed $5,000,000. (C) Determinations Final - Any certification of, or determination not to certify, an act of terrorism under this paragraph shall be final, and shall not be subject to judicial review. (D) Nondelegation - The Secretary may not delegate or designate to any other officer, employee, or person, any determination under this paragraph of whether, during the effective period of the Program, an act of terrorism has occurred. THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ENDORSEMENT SHALL APPLY SOLELY TO THE TERRORISM RISK INSURANCE ACT OF 2002 AND SHALL 1N NO WAY CONFLICT WITH THOSE OF AVN48B AND AMENDMENTS THERETO. All other provisions of this policy remain the same. This endorsement becomes effective MAY 19, 2004 to be attached to and hereby made a part of Policy No. AV 3224873 -10 issued to CITY OF EL MONTE By NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA Endorsement No. 14 Date of Issue MAY 19, 2004 AV856 (1103) By (Authorized Representative) NOISE AND POLLUTION AND OTHER PERILS EXCLUSION CLAUSE This policy is amended as follows: In the event any of the provisions of this endorsement are in conflict with any provisions, exclusions, conditions or terms forming part of this policy, this endorsement shall take precedence. ,- 1. This policy does not cover claims directly or indirectly occasioned by, happening through or in consequence of: (a) noise (whether audible to the human ear or not), vibration, sonic boom and any phenomena associated . therew ith, (b) pollution and contamination of any kind whatsoever, (c) electrical and electromagnetic interference, (d) interference with the use of property; unless caused by or resulting in a crash, fire, explosion or collision or a recorded in- flight emergency causing abnormal aircraft operation. 2. With respect to any provision in the policy concerning any duty of the Company to investigate or defend claims, such provision shall not apply and the Company shall not be required to defend: (a) claims excluded by paragraph 1., or (b) a claim or claims covered by the policy when combined with any claims excluded by paragraph 1 (referred to below as "Combined Claims "). 3. In respect of any Combined Claims, the Company shall (subject to proof of loss and the limits of the policy) reimburse the Insured for that portion of the following items which may be allocated to the claims covered by the policy: (a) damages awarded against the Insured and (b) defense fees and expenses incurred by the Insured. 4. Nothing herein shall override any radioactive contamination or other exclusion clause attached to or forming part of this policy. All other provisions of this policy remain the same. This endorsement becomes effective MAY 19, 2004 to be attached to and hereby made a part of Policy No. AV 3224873 -10 issued to CITY OF EL MONTE By NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA Endorsement No. 15 Date of Issue _ May 2004 MA By (Authorized Representative) AVN46B (1/02) NUCLEAR RISKS EXCLUSION CLAUSE This policy is amended as follows: In the event any of the provisions of this endorsement are in conflict with any provisions, exclusions, conditions or terms forming part of this policy, this endorsement shall take precedence. 1. This policy does not cover: (i) loss or destruction of or damage to any property whatsoever or any loss or expense whatsoever resulting or arising therefrom or any consequential loss (ii) any legal liability of whatsoever nature directly or indirectly caused by or contributed to by or arising from: (a) the radioactive, toxic, explosive or other hazardous properties of any explosive nuclear assembly or nuclear component thereof; (b) the radioactive properties of, or a combination of radioactive properties with toxic, explosive or other hazardous properties of, any other radioactive material in the course of carriage as cargo, including storage or handling incidental thereto; (c) ionizing radiations or contamination by radioactivity from, or the toxic, explosive or other hazardous properties of, any other radioactive source whatsoever. 2. It is understood and agreed that such radioactive material or other radioactive source in paragraph 1. (b) and (c) above shall not include: (i) depleted uranium and natural uranium in any form; (ii) radioisotopes which have reached the final stage of fabrication so as to be usable for any scientific, medical, agricultural, commercial, educational or industrial purpose. 3. This policy, however, does not cover loss of or destruction of or damage to any property or any consequential loss or any legal liability of whatsoever nature with respect to which: (i) the Insured under this policy is also an insured or an additional insured under any other insurance policy, including any nuclear energy liability policy; or (ii) any person or organization is required to maintain financial `protection pursuant to legislation in any country; or (iii) the Insured under this policy is, or had this policy not been issued would be, entitled to indemnification from any government or agency thereof. AVN38B (1/02) Page 1 of Fj)dorsement No. 16 4. Loss, destruction, damage, expense or legal liability in respect of the nuclear risks not excluded by reason of paragraph 2. shall (subject to all other terms, conditions, limitations, warranties and exclusions of this policy) be covered, provided that: (i) in the case of any claim in respect of radioactive material in the course of carriage as cargo, including storage or handling incidental thereof, such carriage shall in all respects have complied with the full International Civil Aviation Organization "Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air ", unless the carriage shall have been subject to any more restrictive legislation, when it shall in all respects have complied with such legislation; (ii) this policy shall only apply to an incident happening during the period of this policy and where any claim by the insured against the Company or by any claimant against the Insured arising out of such incident shall have been made within three years after the date thereof; (iii) in the case of any claim for the loss of or destruction of or damage to or toss of use of an aircraft caused by or contributed to by radioactive contamination, the level of such contamination shall have exceeded the maximum permissible level set out in the following scale: Emitter Maximum permissible level of non - fixed radioactive (IAEA Health and Safety Regulations surface contamination (Averaged over 300 cm2) Beta, gamma and low toxicity alpha emitters Not exceeding 4 Bequerels / cry (10 - 4microcuries / cm2 ) All other alpha emitters Not exceeding 0.4 Bequerels / cry (10- 5microcuries / cm2) (iv) the cover afforded hereby may be cancelled at any time by the Company giving seven days' notice of cancellation. All other provisions of this policy remain the same. This endorsement becomes effective MAY 19, 2004 to be attached to and hereby made a part of Policy No. AV 3224873 -10 issued to CITY OF EL MONTE By NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA Endorsement No. 16— Date of Issue May 4, 2004 (MA) By (Authorized Representative) AVN38B (1/02) Page 2 CALIFORNIA CANCELLATION 1 NONRENEWAL ENDORSEMENT- AVIATION Wherever used in this endorsement: 1) "we ", "us ", "our ", and "Insurer" mean the insurance company which issued this policy; and 2) "you ", "your ", "Named Insured "First Named Insured ", and "Insured" mean the Named Corporation, Named Organization, Named Sponsor, Named Insured, or Insured stated in the Declarations page; and 3) "Other Insured(s)" means all other persons or entities afforded coverage under the policy. in consideration of the premium charged, the cancellation clause is replaced with the following: CANCELLATION The First Named Insured shown in the declarations may cancel the policy by mailing or delivering to the Insurer advance written notice of cancellation. If the policy has been in effect for more than sixty (60) days or if it is a renewal, effective immediately, the Insurer may not cancel the policy unless such cancellation is based on one or more of the following reasons: 1.. Nonpayment of premium, including payment due on a prior policy issued by the Insurer and due during the current policy term covering the same risks. 2. A judgement by a court or an administrative tribunal that the named Insured has violated any law of this state or of the United States having as one of its necessary elements an act which materially increases any of the risks insured against. 3. Discovery of fraud or material misrepresentation by either of the following: a) The Insured or Other Insured(s) or his or her representative in obtaining the insurance or b) The named Insured or his or her representative in pursuing a claim under the policy. 4. Discovery of willful or grossly negligent acts or omissions, or of any violations of state laws or regulations establishing safety standards, by the named Insured or Other Insured(s) or a representative of same, which materially increase any of the risks insured against. 5. Failure by the named Insured or Other insured(s) or a representative of same to implement reasonable loss control requirements which were agreed to by the Insured as a condition of policy issuance or which were conditions precedent to the use by the Insurer of a particular rate or rating plan if the failure materially increases any of the risks insured against. 6. A determination by the commissioner that the loss of, or changes in, an insurer's reinsurance covering all or part of the risk would threaten the financial integrity or solvency of the Insurer. 7. A determination by the commissioner that a continuation of the policy coverage could place the Insurer in violation of the laws of this state or the state of its domicile or that the continuation of coverage would threaten the solvency of the Insurer: 8. A change by the named Insured or Other Insured(s) or a representative of same in the activities or property of the commercial or industrial enterprise which results in a material added risk, a materially increased risk or a materially changed risk, unless the added, increased, or changed risk is included in the policy. Notice of cancellation shall be delivered .or mailed to the producer of record and the Named Insured at least thirty (30) days prior to the effective date of cancellation. Where cancellation is for nonpayment of premium or fraud, notice shall be given no less than ten (10) days prior to the effective date of cancellation. SE52133 (1/99) Page 1 of Endorsement No. 17 NQNRENEWAL If the Insurer decides not to renew the policy, the Insurer shall mail or deliver to the producer of record and the named Insured notice of nonrenewal at least sixty (60) days but no more than 120 days prior to the end of the policy period. The notice shall contain the reason for nonrenewal of the policy. REN EW A L If a policy has been in effect for more than sixty (60) days or if the policy is a renewal, effective immediately no increase in premium, reduction in limits, or change in the conditions of coverage shall be effective during the policy period unless based upon one of the following reasons: 1 Discovery of willful or grossly negligent acts or omissions, or of any violations of state laws or regulations establishing safety standards by the named Insured or Other Insured(s) which materially increase any of the risks or hazards insured against. 2. Failure by the named- Insured or Other Insured(s) to implement reasonable loss control requirements which were agreed to by the Insured as a condition of policy issuance or which were conditions precedent to the use by the Insurer of a particular rate or rating plan, if the failure materially increases any of the risks insured against. 3. A determination by the commissioner that loss of or changes in an insurer's reinsurance covering all or part of the risk covered by the policy would threaten the financial integrity or solvency of the Insurer unless the change in the terms or conditions or rate upon which the premium is based is permitted. 4. A change by the named Insured or Other Insured(s) in the activities or property of the commercial or industrial enterprise which results in a materially added risk, a materially increased risk, or materially changed risk, unless the added, increased, or changed risk is included in the policy. Written notice shall be mailed or delivered to the named Insured and the producer of record at least thirty (30) -days prior to the effective date of any increase, reduction or change. All other provisions of this policy remain the same. This endorsement becomes effective MAY 19, 2004 to be attached to and hereby made a part of Policy No. AV 3224873 -10 issued to CITY OF EL MONTE By NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH PA Endorsement No. 17 Date of Issue May 4, 2004 (MA) By (Authorized Representative) SE52133 (1/99) Page 2 AVIATION DATE RECOGNITION ENDORSEMENT WITH LIMITED COVERAGE GRANT AIRCRAFT OPERATORS OPTION 4 This Policy does not cover any claim, damage, injury, loss, cost, expense or liability (whether in contract, tort, negligence, product liability, misrepresentation, fraud or otherwise) of any nature whatsoever arising from or occasioned by or in consequence of (whether directly or indirectly and whether wholly or partly): a) the failure or inability of any computer hardware, software, integrated circuit, chip, computer component or other information technology equipment or system (whether in the possession of the Insured or of any third party) accurately or completely to process, recognize, exchange or transfer year, date or time data or information in connection with: - the change of year from 1999 to 2000; and /or - the change of date from 21 August 1999 to 22 August 1999; and /or - any other change of year, date or time; whether on or before or after such change of year, date or time; b) any implemented or attempted change or modification of any computer hardware, software, integrated circuit, chip, computer component or other information technology equipment or system (whether in the possession of the Insured or of any third party) in anticipation of or in response to any such change of year, date or time, or any advice given or services performed in connection with any such change or modification; c) any non -use or unavailability for use of any property or equipment of any kind whatsoever resulting from any act, failure to act or decision of the Insured or of any third party related to any such change of year, date or time; and any provision in this Policy concerning any duty of the Company to investigate or defend claims shall not apply to any claims so excluded. HOWEVER, in consideration of the additional premium of $ INCLUDED it is hereby understood and agreed that this endorsement shall not apply to: 1. any accidental loss of or damage to an aircraft defined in the policy schedule (Insured Aircraft); and 2. any sums which the Insured shall become legally liable to pay, and (if so required by the Policy) shall pay (including costs awarded against the Insured) in respect of: (a) accidental bodily injury (fatal or otherwise) to passengers directly caused by an accident to an insured aircraft; and /or (b) loss of or damage to baggage and personal articles of passengers, mail and cargo directly caused by an accident to an insured aircraft; and /or (c) accidental bodily injury (fatal or otherwise) and accidental damage to property directly caused by an insured aircraft or by any person or object falling therefrom. 71223 (6/99) Page 1 of Endorsement No. 18 PROVIDED THAT; 1 Coverage provided pursuant to this endorsement shall be subject to all terms, conditions, limitations, warranties, exclusions and cancellation provisions of this Policy (except as specifically provided herein), and nothing in this endorsement extends coverage beyond that which is provided by the Policy, 2. Nothing in this endorsement shall provide any coverage in respect of grounding and /or loss of use of any aircraft which has not been physically damaged or destroyed in the accident giving rise to a claim under the Policy. All other provisions of this policy remain the same. This endorsement becomes effective MAY 19, 2004 to be attached to and hereby made a part of Policy No. AV 3224873 -10 issued to CITY OF EL MONTE By NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA Endorsement No. 18 Date of Issue May 4, 2004 (MA) By (Authorized Representative) 71223 (6199) Page 2 CA Agmt No. 04PS069 AMENDEI? HELICOPTER AGREEMENT This Helicopter Agreement (hereinafter "Agreement ") is made and entered this day of 2005, by and between the City of El Monte, a municipal corporation ( hereinafter "El Monte ") and the City of Baldwin Park, a municipal corporation ( hereinafter 'Baldwin Park "), collectively referred herein as "Parties ". WITNESSETH: Whereas, the cities of El Monte and Baldwin Park are located in the County of Los Angeles, State of California; and Whereas, both El Monte and Baldwin Park have and maintain their own police departments; and Whereas, over the years El Monte and Baldwin Park have cooperated on policing matters and desire to continue to do so in the manner and time described in this Agreement; and Whereas, El Monte is the owner of two R -44 Police Equipped Helicopters, Serial No. 331 and Serial No. 1060 ( hereinafter "Helicopters "); and and Whereas, El Monte has placed the Helicopters in use as a part of its policing function; Whereas, Baldwin Park desires to continue to utilize the Helicopters in aiding its policing function; and Whereas, El Monte and Baldwin Park have previously entered into an agreement dated Tune 13, 2001, regarding the use of the Helicopters; and Whereas, the Parties hereby agree to terminate the previous helicopter agreement by the execution of this Agreement; and Whereas, the Parties have agreed that they will participate in a Helicopter Program to provide assistance to the contracted Police Departments (hereinafter "Cities" or "Agencies"), subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement; and Whereas, the legislative bodies of each of the cities has heretofore determined that the public interest, convenience and necessity require the execution and the implementation of this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual benefits to be derived by the parties and the promises herein contained, the Parties do hereby agree as follows: C: \Documents and Settings \366\Deslctop\Pending\City Contacts 12- 10 -04W Helicopter Agmt- 9 -8 -04 - amended.doc 1 CA Approval Date CA Agmt No. 04PS069 Section 1. Obligations of El Monte. El Monte agrees to make available the Helicopters to Baldwin Park for use in its policing functions. In addition, El Monte shall provide full -time police officers (hereinafter "El Monte Pilots ") to pilot the Helicopters, except as provided in Section 2. El Monte shall be responsible for payment of all of the El Monte Pilots' wages and benefits as employees of the City of El Monte, and shall comply with all requirements pertaining to employer's liability, worker's compensation, unemployment insurance, and social security. El Monte shall procure and maintain at all times during the Initial Term or any Renewal Term of this Agreement all appropriate liability insurance coverage on the Helicopter to which El Monte will deliver to Baldwin Park a certificate of insurance evidencing such insurance coverage upon demand. All applicable insurance policies shall name Baldwin Park as an additional insured. The Parties agree that Baldwin Park's failure to issue a written objection to the certificate of insurance within ten (10) days from its receipt by Baldwin Park shall be interpreted to mean that Baldwin Park is satisfied as to the adequacy of the insurance coverage procured and maintained by El Monte and accepts the coverage of El Monte in full. Further, El Monte shall be responsible for all maintenance or repairs to the Helicopters. Section 2. Obligations of Baldwin Park. Baldwin Park shall pay El Monte for the use of the Helicopters pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. In addition, Baldwin Park shall provide one full -time employee. It shall be Baldwin Park's option if that employee will be a Baldwin Park Tactical Flight Officer (hereinafter "BPTFO ") or a Baldwin Park Pilot (hereinafter "BPP "). If the BPTFO/BPP is absent from work due to vacation, sick time, personal leave, or compensatory time, Baldwin Park shall make every reasonable effort to provide a replacement. If Baldwin Park is unable to provide a replacement BPTFOBPP, the City of El Monte shall have the option of providing a TFOIP or ceasing flight operations until such time as a TFO/P is available for flight duty. Baldwin Park shall be responsible for payment of all of the BPTFOs'/BPPs' wages and benefits as employees of the City of Baldwin Park, and shall comply with all requirements pertaining to employer's liability, worker's compensation, unemployment insurance and Social Security. Section 3 Reciprocal Indemnification and Hold Harmless Provisions. El Monte agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Baldwin Park, its elected and appointed officers, employees and agents from and against any damage or injury to persons, including death, and /or property due to the negligence or willful acts by El Monte, their elected and appointed officers, employees and agents in performing its duties and obligations, pursuant to this Agreement. Any claim for indemnification must be submitted in writing to the person set forth for notice contained in this Agreement. Baldwin Park agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City of El Monte and its other contract cities, its elected and appointed officers, employees and agents from and against any damage or injury to persons, including death, and/or property due to the negligence or willful acts by Baldwin Park, their elected and appointed officers, employees and agents in performing its duties and obligations, pursuant to this Agreement. Any claim for indemnification must be submitted in writing to the person set forth for notice contained in this Agreement: C.; \Documents and Settings \366\Desktop\Pending \City Contacts 12- 10 -04\BP Helicopter Agmt- 9 -8 -04 - amended.doe 2 CA Approval Date CA Agmt No. 04PS069 Section 4. Mission. The mission of the Helicopter Program established by this Agreement shall be to provide police air support services for the Police Department of Baldwin Park and such other Cities which participate. Such services shall include, but is not limited to, response to emergency calls for surveillance relating to in-progress felonies, crimes against persons, vehicle pursuits and similar activities. The Helicopter Program will be based upon a planned seven (7) day availability per week basis, primarily for nighttime operations. When operations are cancelled due to weather, maintenance or any other matter causing cancellation, the personnel of the parties will be reassigned to their respective police departments for deployment. In such occasions where there is a request or need for air support from more than one (1) city, the mission of the Helicopter Program is to provide air support to the city with the highest priority (nature) of call. Said determination as to which agency shall receive air support shall lie within the sole discretion of the Tactical Flight Officer and/or Pilot in Command. If air support cannot be provided by El Monte to Baldwin Park for "priority call," El Monte shall attempt to secure air support from another agency at no additional cost or liability to Baldwin Park. Section 5. Costs. Baldwin Park shall pay to the City of El Monte as and for its proportionate share of the costs to use the Helicopters the maximum of sum of Sixty-Seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($67, 500.00) per year payable in monthly installments of Five Thousand Six Hundred and Twenty Five dollars or more ($5,625.00) commencing thirty (30) days following the execution of this Agreement. Section 6. Special Missions. Baldwin Park shall be entitled to the use of the Helicopters for special missions such as narcotics service, and/or community events (hereinafter "Special Missions"). For any Special Mission requested by Baldwin Park, Baldwin Park shall pay El Monte the total cost of the operation of the Helicopter, computed at $134.00 per hour. There will be a minimum charge of one (1) hour. Special missions shall be billed separately and in addition from the costs set forth in Section 5. Section 7. Non-Liabilily. of Official or Employee of Baldwin Park. No official or employee of Baldwin Park shall be personally liable to El Monte in the event of any default or breach by Baldwin Park for any amount of monies which may become due to El Monte under paragraphs 5 and 6 Section 8. Term. The term of this Agreement shall be for a period of one (1) year from and after the effective date hereof (hereinafter "Initial Term"). Subject to the same terms of the Agreement and provided that neither Party is in material default under this Agreement, this Agreement may be renewed in writing by the Parties for additional terms of one (1) year each (hereinafter "Renewal Tenn") upon written notice of intention to renew not less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the Initial Tenn or any Renewal Term. Section 9. Termination. At any time during the Initial Term or any Renewal Term of this Agreement, either Party hereto shall have the right to terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other Party. The effective date of such C:\Documents and Settings\366\Desktop\Pending\Cit7y Contacts 12-10-04\BP Helicopter Agmt-9-8-04 - arnended.doc 3 CA Approval Date CA Agmt No. 04PS069 termination shall be the thirty-first (31st) day following the date of the notice of termination. Baldwin Park shall pay El Monte any costs which would otherwise be payable to El Monte for utilization of the Helicopters, which have accrued up and including the last day of service of the Helicopter. Section 10. Notices. Whenever notices are required to be given pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement, the same shall be in writing, served upon the Parry to the address and recipient designated below and conclusively deemed served when delivered personally or on the third business day after the deposit thereof in the United States Mail, postage prepaid. All notices, demands, requests or approval hereunder shall be given to the following addresses or such other addresses as the parties may designate by written notice: EL MONTE: City of El Monte 11333 Valley Boulevard El Monte, California 91731 Attn: City Manager BALDWIN PARK: City of Baldwin Park 14403 E. Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, Calif. 91706 Attn: Police Chief Section 11. Compliance with Laws: In administering the Helicopter Program., the Parties agree at all times to observe and comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, codes and regulations of the federal, state and local governments. Section 12. Binding Effect. The provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon the Parties hereto and their respective successors in interest. Section 13. Section Headings. The section headings contained in this Agreement are for convenience and identification only and shall not be deemed to limit or define the contents of the sections to which they relate. Section 14. No Presumption Re: Drafter. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the terms and provisions of this Agreement have been negotiated and discussed between the Parties and their attorneys, and this Agreement reflects their mutual agreement regarding the same. Because of the nature of such negotiations and discussions, it would be inappropriate to deem any Party to be the drafter of this Agreement, and therefore no presumption for or against validity or as to any interpretation hereof, based upon the identity of the drafter shall be applicable in interpreting or enforcing this Agreement. Section 15. Assistance of Counsel. Authority to Execute. Each Party to this Agreement agrees and acknowledges to the other Party that (1) that each Party either had the assistance of counsel in the negotiation for, and execution of, this Agreement, and all related documents; and (2) that each Party has lawfully authorized the execution of this Agreement. C: \Documents and Settings \366\Desktop\Pending\City Contacts 12- 10 -04\BP Helicopter Agmt- 9 -8 -04 - amended.doc 4 CA Approval Date CA Agmt No. 04PS069 Section 16, Dispute Resolution. Disputes regarding the interpretation or application of any provision of this Agreement shall, to the extent feasible, be resolved through good faith negotiations between the Parties. If any action at law or equity is required to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing Party in such litigation shall be entitled to an award of reasonable attorney's fees in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled. Section 17. Arbitration. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, the parties hereto agree that any claim or dispute between them, arising out of or relating to the terms of this Agreement, shall be resolved by compulsory binding arbitration conducted by a retired Superior Court Judge of the State of California or other qualified person the parties mutually agree upon, provided such arbitration is approved by the legislative bodies of the respective parties. The claim or dispute being arbitrated shall be resolved in accordance with California law. If applicable, the arbitration proceedings shall be governed by the laws and procedures governing civil judicial proceedings, including, but not limited to, discovery statutes. Each Party shall comply with all applicable laws relating to binding and compulsory arbitration, the directions given by the Arbitrator and the provisions of this Agreement. The determinations made by the Arbitrator, if within the scope of the Arbitration and the Arbitrator's function, shall be binding and conclusive on the Parties and shall be enforceable in the manner provided by law. The Arbitrator shall be selected in the following manner: (1) The Party initiating the arbitration ( "Initiating Party") shall prepare and submit to the other Party a list ("List") containing the names of not less than three (3) retired Superior Court Judges all of whom the Initiating Party believes are qualified to serve as Arbitrator. The names of the judges on the List shall be numbered consecutively. (2) The Party upon whom the List is served, within ten (10) calendar days after service of the List, shall either: (a) select one of the named retired judges to act as Arbitrator, in which case that retired judge shall serve as the Arbitrator; or (b) strike one (1) name from the List. (3) Upon expiration of said ten (10) day period, if no selection is made, the Arbitrator shall be the retired judge on the List with the lowest number next to his name, unless that judge's name was stricken during the ten (10) day period by the non- initiating Party. (4) If, for any reason, the retired judge designated as the Arbitrator is unwilling or unable to serve as the Arbitrator, the judge on the List with the next lower number whose name was not stricken shall be the Arbitrator. In the event that none of the three retired judges named on a List, are willing or able to serve as the Arbitrator, C:\Documents and Settings \366\Desh -top\Pending \City Contacts 12- 10 -04\BP Helicopter Agmt- 9 -8 -04 - amended.doc $ CA Approval Date CA Agmt No. 04PS069 the Initiating Party shall prepare and submit a new List, containing the names of not less than three (3) different retired judges, and the above described procedure shall be followed until an Arbitrator is selected. Each Party hereto hereby agrees to pay one -half of the compensation to be paid to the Arbitrator, and except as otherwise expressly provided herein, each Party shall bear its own costs and expenses of arbitration, including, but not limited to, attorneys' fees and related costs. By way of illustration, if the List served by the Initiating Party, upon the other Party, has the name of three (3) retired judges, A, B, and C, numbered 1, 2 and 3, respectively; and number 1 is stricken, then B, Number 2, shall be deemed, for all purposes, to be the selected Arbitrator. Section 18. Severability. This Agreement shall not be deemed severable. If any provision or part hereof is judicially declared invalid, this Agreement shall be void and of no further effect. Section 19. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be interpreted and construed according to the laws of the State of California and venue shall be in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. Section 20. Waiver. Waiver by any Party of any term, condition or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute the waiver of any other term, condition or covenant hereof. Section 21. Modification. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the Parties. Any prior agreements, promises, negotiations or representations not expressly set forth herein are of no force or effect. Subsequent modifications to this Agreement shall be effective only if in writing and signed by each Party: Section 22. Effective Date. Unless otherwise specified herein, this Agreement shall become effective as of the date both Parties execute this Agreement. Section 23. Supersedes All Prior Agreements This Agreement shall supersede all previous agreements written and approved prior to the effective date of this agreement. CITY OF EL MONTE Date: Ernest G. Gutierrez Mayor of the City of El Monte ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Lorene Gutierrez, E. Clarke Moseley City Clerk of the City of El Monte El Monte City Attorney C: \Documents and Settings \366\Desktop\Pending\City Contacts 12 -10 -04\131' Helicopter Agmt- 9 -8 -04 - amended.doe 6 CA Approval Date CA Agmt No. 04PS069 CITY OF BALDWIN PARK Date: Manuel Lozano Mayor of the City of Baldwin Park ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kathryn Tizeareno Stephanie Scher City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park City Attorney for Baldwin Park C: \Documents and Settings \366\Desktop\Pending \City Contacts 12- 10 -04\BP Helicopter Agmt- 9 -8 -04 - amended.doc 7 CA Approval Date CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FEB 2 CITY OF BALDWIN PARK CONSENT A B_ALDWIN P A, R, K TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council t FROM:. Mark Kling, Chief of Police Pw i DATE: February 2, 2005 SUBJECT: MEGANS LAW UPDATE Purpose To inform City Council of the various classification levels of sexual predators and to seek direction in establishing a City policy on community notification. Background At the January 19, 2005, City Council meeting, Council requested information from the police department relative to sexual predator classification and notification. Staff has determined that the issue of community notification will involve a policy decision by the City Council and is preparing a draft for your review. However, the draft was not completed, due to its complexity, priorto the deadline requirements for this agenda notice. Staff is presently examining a variety of notification processes and will submit the draft policy for Council discussion at the February 2, 2005, City Council meeting. Fiscal Impact None Recommendation City Council receive and file this information memorandum. � r! FEB ITEM N0. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: CONTINUED FROM JANUARY 19, 2005 - Public Hearing to Consid Approval of Amendment to Fiscal Year 2004-2005 Annual Action Plal PURPOSE Per City Council request, this staff report was prepared to provide additional information regarding the amount of CDBG funds available to reallocate as part of the Amendment to the FY 2004 -2005 Annual Action Plan. The City Council is also requested to continue the public hearing to consider the approval of the proposed Amendment to the FY 2004 -2005 Annual Action Plan. BACKGROUND In May 2004, the City of Baldwin Park submitted its FY 2004 -2005 Annual Action Plan, which allocate CDBG and HOME funds to activities approved by the City Council. HUD approved the document on August 9, 2004. In accordance with HUD regulations the City is required to allocate its funds to specific projects. HUD recommends that mid -year amendments to the annual plan be made to reallocate program income funds and unexpended funds that were allocated to projects the previous year. Eligible Uses and Calculation of Available CDBG Funding The amount of available of funding must be reallocated to eligible CDBG projects. CDBG projects must meet one of the following National Objectives: ■ Benefit to low and moderate income persons; ■ Aid in the prevention and elimination of slum and blight; and ■ Meet a need of having a particular urgency _I_ This amendment proposes allocations to projects using uncommitted CDBG Program Income at the end of FY 2003 -2004 and unexpended FY 2003 -2004 CDBG projects (expenditures based on actual drawdowns in)DIS): CDBG Funds Proposed Reallocations At the January 19, 2005 City Council meeting, staff was requested to review funding options for CDBG activities. Below are staff's funding recommendations: Proposed CDBG Substantial Changes CDBG ACTIVITY Proposed Amendment Public Improvements/ Rehabilitation $109,000 of the Family Service Center Commercial Rehabilitation Program / $271,000 Business Improvement Program Residential Rehabilitation Grant Program $20,000 Public Improvements / Rehabilitation of the Family Service Center This amendment is requested to provide funding for the necessary rehabilitation of the Family Service Center. This funding would allow for repair of the water damages caused to the family service center by the recent rainstorms. Commercial Rehabilitation Loan / Business Improvement Program This program will aim to reverse the physical and economic decline of the City's existing commercial and industrial buildings and sites located in Redevelopment Project Areas and in low and moderate income areas within the City of Baldwin Park. Guidelines had been prepared and were considered by the City Council at its January 19, 2005 meeting. Residential Rehabilitation Grant Program Due to goal of having four Neighborhood Pride Day events a year, the need for funding of the rehabilitation grants has increased. The goal of four Neighborhood Pride Days would include providing grants to at least two property owners per event. Neighborhood Pride Days would cause the current budget in the amount of $50,000 to be insufficient to meet the needs of the other property owners in need of grants for improvements. To -2- Balances from unexpended FY 03/04 projects $ 245,918 Uncommitted Program Income from FY 03/04 $ 154,082 Amount available to reallocate $ 400,000 Proposed Reallocations At the January 19, 2005 City Council meeting, staff was requested to review funding options for CDBG activities. Below are staff's funding recommendations: Proposed CDBG Substantial Changes CDBG ACTIVITY Proposed Amendment Public Improvements/ Rehabilitation $109,000 of the Family Service Center Commercial Rehabilitation Program / $271,000 Business Improvement Program Residential Rehabilitation Grant Program $20,000 Public Improvements / Rehabilitation of the Family Service Center This amendment is requested to provide funding for the necessary rehabilitation of the Family Service Center. This funding would allow for repair of the water damages caused to the family service center by the recent rainstorms. Commercial Rehabilitation Loan / Business Improvement Program This program will aim to reverse the physical and economic decline of the City's existing commercial and industrial buildings and sites located in Redevelopment Project Areas and in low and moderate income areas within the City of Baldwin Park. Guidelines had been prepared and were considered by the City Council at its January 19, 2005 meeting. Residential Rehabilitation Grant Program Due to goal of having four Neighborhood Pride Day events a year, the need for funding of the rehabilitation grants has increased. The goal of four Neighborhood Pride Days would include providing grants to at least two property owners per event. Neighborhood Pride Days would cause the current budget in the amount of $50,000 to be insufficient to meet the needs of the other property owners in need of grants for improvements. To -2- date, the City has provided two Neighborhood Pride Day grants for exterior improvements and one grant for bathroom repairs. Staff is in the process of selecting a date and neighborhood for Neighborhood Pride Day events possibly in March and June. An increase of an additional $20,000 is being requested to ensure the availability of funds for future Neighborhood Pride Day events and also meet the needs of other residents for the remainder of FY 04/05. Proposed HOME Substantial Chances Eligible Uses and Calculation of Available HOME Funding Although HOME funds are also Federal Entitlements Funds, they are a completely separate source of funds from CDBG Entitlement funds and are much more restrictive. Unlike CDBG funds, HOME funds may only be used for affordable housing projects. Types of eligible HOME projects include acquisition, development, rehabilitation and rental assistance'. All acquisition and development projects must create affordable' housing units. Similar to CDBG funds, HOME funds must also benefit low to moderate- income households (80 % of the County's median income as defined by HUD). - HOME funds must be committed in two years and expended in five years. Committal is defined as commitment of funds to an actual address or site. For example, although the City commits $300,000 in the City budget to the First Time Homebuyer Program, HUD does not consider the funds committed until a buyer is approved to purchase an actual property /address. Based on the HUD HOME Fund Production Report as of December 31, 2004, the City must commit $364,416 of HOME funds by July 31, 2005 or HUD could recapture funds. This amendment proposes allocations to projects using' uncommitted HOME program income that was reported in IDIS at of the end of FY 2003 -2004 and unexpended FY 2003 -2004 HOME projects (expenditures based on actual drawdowns in IDIS): HOME Funds Balances from unexpended FY 03/04 projects $ 370,024 Uncommitted Program Income from FY 03/04 $ 239,976 Amount available to reallocate $ 610,000 HOME ACTIVITY Proposed Amendment Tenant Based Rental Assistance $610,000 -3- Tenant Based Rental Assistance Staff is in the process of preparing guidelines for a new program to assist low and very low- income households with preferences for those who have been involuntarily displaced by the City for redevelopment purposes. Citizen Participation Requirements In accordance with the City of Baldwin Park's approved Citizen Participation Plan, prior to amending an Annual Action Plan, the City shall provide residents with a notice of proposed change(s) and the opportunity to comment on such proposed change(s). A Public Notice was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune on December 20, -2004, and again on January 5, 2005 Attached for your review are the draft amended sections to be inserted into the FY 2004 -2005 Annual Action Plan upon approval by the City Council. RECOMMENDATION Following the public hearing, it is recommended that the City Council reallocate CDBG and HOME funding and approve of the draft Amendment to the FY 2004 -2005 Annual Action Plan. Attached Draft Amended Sections to the FY 2004 -2005 Annual Action Plan -4- 1) Rehabilitation of the City's Family Service Center, the Teri Muse Center — This activity will provide funding for the necessary rehabilitation of the Family Service Center. The family service center was damaged during the recent rainstorms. This funding would allow for a new storm drain system for the building. The Teri Muse Center is a resource center to provide a variety of social services to the extremely low to moderate- income residents. Geographic Distribution: The Teri Must Center is Located in a CDBG Eligible Census Tract and Block Group and provides services to all residents Citywide. However the types of services provided are focused on the needs of the extremely low to moderate- income residents Service Delivery and Management: The Public Works will oversee the rehabilitation of the Teri Muse Center and Community Development Department will provide the oversight of the CDBG requirements. 2) Business Improvement Program /Commercial Rehabilitation Grant: The City is preparing guidelines for the Commercial and Industrial Rehabilitation Program that will be established as an incentive for property owners and /or business owners of commercial and industrial properties located in eligible areas within the City of Baldwin Park to improve the exterior of their business. Businesses may be eligible to receive rebates of up to the maximum amount of $15,000 for business improvements. Business owners with multiple businesses may apply for a maximum of $95,000. Businesses seeking rebates for site improvements will be required to meet the job retention /creation regulations. The City of Baldwin Park has set aside a $340,000 of its Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) allocation to fund the Commercial Rehabilitation Loan Program and plans to assist 22 businesses in the City of Baldwin Park, Geographic Distribution: The rebates will be available to the businesses located in eligible CDBG service areas and Redevelopment Project Areas. Service Delivery and Management: The City's Housing Department and Community Development Department will work together to effectively complete this project. 3) Tenant Based Rental Assistance (T RA): The City is preparing guidelines for a new program utilizing HOME funds to assist low and very low- income households. Ninety- percent of the households assisted by this program will be at or below 60% of the areas median income. The remaining 10% can be at or below 80% of the areas median income. The City will adopt the Section 8 Housing Voucher Program rules to assist with the administration of the program. The TBRA in FY 2004 -2005 will be funded with $690,000 in HOME funds. The City of Baldwin Park plans to assist 15 families for the next four years. Geographic Distribution: the TBRA program will be available citywide to all residents with preference given to those who have been involuntarily displaced by the City for redevelopment purposes. Service Delivery and Management.- The daily administrative activities of the TBRA will be handled by the Housing Department. 4) Residential Rehabilitation Grant Program (RGP) - If necessary, a very low, low and moderate- income (80% of median income) homeowner may be eligible for a grant to improve their property. Grants may range from as low as $500 to a maximum of $5, 000 depending on need and work the property requires. Typically, the RGP provide funding for non - substantial home repairs such as exterior improvements. The primary objective of the RGP is to provide financial assistance to very low, low, and moderate - income homeowners for the effective maintenance of the City's quality single family housing stock. The RGP will be funded with $70,000 in CDBG funds. The City of Baldwin Park has approved 3 of the annual goal of providing 14 grants during FY 2004 -2005. Geographic Distribution. The HIRP and RGP is available citywide as long as the homeowner's income is at or below 80% of median income, unless funded with 20% Housing Set Aside Funds. Service Delivery and Management. The City's Housing Department administers the HIRP and the RGP. The Housing Programs Coordinator and Rehabilitation Housing Specialist are responsible for the daily activities involved with this program. Essentially, the City's Housing Director supervises the HIRP and RGP coordinator, and the City's Loan Committee ultimately approves all HIRP loans and RGP's. ) Residential Rehabilitation Administration - Funds to be utilized for loan and grant processing, inspections and other related services related to assisting owners, tenants, contractors or other entities participating or seeking to participate in the City's Rehabilitation Programs Geographic Distribution. The Rehabilitation Loan and Grant Programs are available citywide as long as the homeowner's income is at or below 80% of median income, unless funded with 20% Housing Set Aside Funds. Service Delivery and Management. The City's Housing Department administers the programs. "Only those approved by City Council will be included in the amended Annual Plan. AGP -108, Z -542, DR -28 and TM -62166 February 2, 2005 Page 2 project with a reduction in the number of units. As a result, the applicant has redesigned the project with one (1) less unit. Although the applicant has reduced the number of units as requested by the City Council, the applicant has indicated to staff that he would like the City Council to reconsider approving the project as originally designed with five (5) units. CEQA/NOTICING A Notice of Public Hearing was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and mailed to all property owners within a 300- foot radius of the subject properties on November 18, 2004. The Planning Division has completed an environmental analysis, and has determined that the project will not have a significant impact upon the environment. Pursuant to that information, a Draft Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact has been prepared pending approval by the City Council. BACKGROUND - Half of one lot of the subject property has a current General Plan Land Use designation of Single - Family Residential, and is consistently zoned R -1, Single - Family Residential; the other has a General Plan Land Use designation of Garden Multi - Family Residential and is consistently zoned R -G, Residential Garden. The property is irregular in shape and contains approximately 19,571 square feet (.45 acres) of area. The total site area is essentially flat and contains an existing single - family residence, which will eventually be demolished. The adjacent zoning and land uses are listed in the table below. Table 1 Adjacent Zoning & Land Use North R -G Attached Multi-Family Units South R -G Single-Family Residences East R -1 Single-Family Residences West R -G Attached Multi-Family Units DISCUSSION GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT /ZONE CHANGE The General Plan Amendment and Zone Change are prerequisites to the preparation of the subject property for the proposed construction of a four (4) unit single - family detached planned development and common lot. Currently, the subject property has two zoning designations. In order for the development to take place, the half portion to AGP -108, Z -542, DR -28 and TM -62166 February 2, 2005, Page 3 the rear of the property that is zoned R -1, single - family residential will need to be rezoned to RG, Residential Garden Multi Family, which corresponds to the existing zoning designation of the front portion. in addition to the change in zoning designation for that portion of the subject property, the applicant is requesting an additional zone change for the entire site to add the planned development (PD) overlay. The R -G zoning of " the property does allow for' residential developments but the Planned Development (PD) designation allows for flexible development standards to encourage and achieve innovative developments. This overall zone change will provide additional moderate density housing stock, take advantage of the underutilized deep lots and potentially eliminate blight in the area with new single- family detached homes developed at multi - family moderate density. The Planned Development Zone contains a provision that requires approval of a Development Plan before building permits can be issued. Where such a Plan has been approved, inconsistent development standards of the underlying zone shall be excluded and superceded by the conditions and standards of the Development Plan. DEVELOPMENT PLAN The applicant is proposing to construct a four (4) unit single - family detached housing development with a common lot. According to the plans submitted to the Planning Division, the four (4) single- family homes will have access from a private driveway entering from Maine Avenue. Each residential unit will have its own enclosed private open space, ranging between 537 square feet and 1,664 square feet, which will be directly accessible from within that unit. This particular design will orientate one the homes toward Maine Avenue, thus, creating a residential presence. Additional features of the project include: colored stamped concrete within the driveway area, decorative block walls and landscaping within common open space areas. According to the floor plans and elevations, all residential units will be two -story with livable floor areas ranging from 1,522 square feet to 1,597 square feet (excluding the garages and balconies) and consist of three (3) bedrooms, three (3) bathrooms and a two -car garage. The table below provides detailed information on unit floor areas (including garages), private open space areas and lot sizes: Table 2 Floor Area and Open Space Lot Number Floor Area.,, Private Open Space Area Lot Size 1 2,033 s.f. 537 s .ft. 2,156 s .ft. 2 2,033 s.f. 537 s .ft. 2,123 s .ft AGP -108, Z -542, DR -28 and TM -62166 February 2, 2005 Page 4 Building Height and Architectural Design The applicant has proposed to employ different designs and materials that will provide variety and aesthetic interest throughout the project. The exterior elevations of the proposed homes will have a mix of classic Spanish Mediterranean style architectural' design. Design elements include a mixture of stucco - finished elevations, faux shutters, wrought iron and decorative veneers. Roofing material will consist of concrete tile. Although there are only three different floor plans proposed, each of the proposed units has been designed to avoid a "monolithic" appearance. The exterior walls and rooflines are staggered along both the vertical and horizontal planes. The roof and wall variations, along with the subtle changes in colors, help to visually reduce the mass and bulk of the buildings. Varying materials are utilized along the front elevation to emphasize an appealing view from the common areas. The project will involve the construction of six (6) foot high block walls around the perimeter of each unit to enclose the private open space areas. Any walls that are visible from the public right -of -way will be decorative block with. a cap. Wall material and any treatment shall be subject to Planning Division review and approval. Staff is of the opinion that this project meets the purpose and intent of the Planned Development Overlay Ordinance and the City's adopted Design Guidelines for Single- Family Detached Planned Residential Developments. Approval of this project will result in the improvement of the overall neighborhood, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP - TM -62166 As a prerequisite for the proposed development, approval of a tentative tract map to subdivide two (2) lots into five (5) lots for residential purposes is required. The Tentative Tract Map illustrates the four (4) building footprints for the residential units and private rear yards. The fifth lot represents the common areas accessible to all owners within the development such as the guest parking stalls, common driveway and the common open space area. Planning Commission Meeting At the November 10, 2004 Planning Commission Meeting, the Commission discussed the various attributes of the project proposal and expressed concern regarding the AGP -108, Z -542, DR -28 and TM -62166 February 2, 2005 Paae 5 density of the project, limited open space areas, and emergency access. As a result, the Commission voted to recommend that the City Council approve the general plan amendment and zone change as requested by the Applicant and develop the project with four (4) dwelling units, instead of five (5). They reasoned that the reduction of one unit would allow for more common and private open space areas and easier ingress and egress while still allowing for a slight increase in the density. Furthermore, the Commission recommended that the Council adopt the Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact and approve the tentative tract map with the corresponding reduction in the number of lots. Staff also explained to the Commissioners that if this project did not seek the Planned Development Overlay and developed the project as a typical multi - family development, the developer could re- propose a five (5) unit attached apartment/condominium style project, which would not require Planning Commission or City Council review. Adding the Planned development Overlay allows each of the units to be developed in a detached manner creating more of a single- family environment and compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood. RECOMMENDATION' Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council: 1) Approve the Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact; and AGP -108, Z -542, DR -28 and TM- 62166 February 2, 2005 Page 6 PURPOSES; APPLICANT: PEDRO AND MARTHA MALTOS; CASE NO.: DR- 28 AND TM- 62166; LOCATION: 4958 MAINE AVENUE ". FINDINGS OF FACT — TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 1. That the site for the proposed development is physically suitable as the topography of the site is essentially flat and will be developed with four (4) single - family detached residential dwelling units at a density allowed by the City's Zoning Code provided that an Amendment to the City's General Plan (for a portion of the site), a Development Plan and Zone Change (to RG(PD) Residential Garden Planned Development for the entire site) are approved; and 2. That the design of the subdivision will not be a threat to the Health, Safety and Welfare of the citizens of Baldwin Park as the proposed project is a four (4) unit single- family detached residential dwelling units which is compatible with the surrounding single-family and multi- family residential zoning designations; and 3. That the Tentative Tract Map will be consistent with the City of Baldwin Park's General Plan, provided the General Plan amendment is approved; and 4. That development of the sites in accordance with the Tentative Tract Map will not affect future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities for the area as the natural topography of the site is flat and the future development of four (4) 2- story dwelling units will therefore not affect said opportunities; and 5. That the proposed Tentative Map is in an area serviced by Valley County Water District and the District has indicated that the proposal will not violate any water quality standards for the Water District. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. That the subject Property shall be developed and maintained in substantial compliance with Exhibit "A ", dated February 2, 2005, except as modified herein by these conditions; and 2. That electric garage door openers shall be provided for each unit; and 3. That sectional roll -up garage doors shall be provided for each unit; and 4. That all landscaped areas must be separated from vehicular areas by a 6" continuous concrete curb; and 5. That a decorative block wall shall be provided surrounding the property. Decorative block walls with brick cap will be required along all exterior property lines that are visible from the public right -of -way and the common driveway, AGP -108, Z -542, DR -28 and TM -62166 February 2, 2005 Page 7 0 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. proposed materials are subject to Planning Division approval. Interior property line delineator walls shall be precision block with a brick cap; and Each of the homes shall be provided with decorative motion sensor lights at each garage and main level entrance door. Exterior lighting shall be decorative and automatically controlled. Manufacturer's literature shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval when plan are submitted to the Building Division for plan check; and Each unit shall be pre -wired for an alarm system; and A detailed landscaping plan shall be provided indicating the size, location, and species of all trees, shrubs, ground cover, and any other plan life proposed. This plan shall be submitted during plan check phase; and All Landscaping shall be automatically irrigated and a detailed irrigation plan shall be submitted during the plan check phase; and That the applicant shall submit a copy of the proposed covenants, conditions and restrictions to the Planning Division prior to obtaining building permits; and That the CC &R's shall reflect that any future addition to individual units shall be limited to a patio cover which shall not exceed 25% of the rear yard area and shall meet all zoning code requirements; and That the CC &R's shall reflect that vehicular parking within identified guest parking stalls shall not exceed seven (7) continuous days within a thirty (30) day period; and That all utilities shall be undergrounded. This includes utility connections to each individual unit, as well as along the frontage of the property along Maine Ave; and 14. Provide the following information upon the Plan Check submittal: A. Three (3) architectural plans and one (1) extra site plan for the Fire Department B. Three (3) complete sets of Plans for the City. C. Two sets of the following are required: i. Soil Reports ii. Structural Calculations iii. Title 24 Energy Calculations 15. That the applicant shall comply with all Los Angeles County Fire Department comments; and AGP -108, Z -542, DR -28 and TM -62166 February 2, 2005 Page 8 16. All conditions of the State Map Subdivision Act and City's Subdivision Ordinance must be met prior to recordation; and 17. All conditions of the Los Angeles County Fire Department must be met prior to recordation. A written notification or approval plan from the Fire Department must be submitted to the City; and 18. All special assessments and utilities or sewer connection fees are to be paid prior to recording the final map; and 19. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including water, gas, electricity, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the respective utility companies' standards. Easements shall be provided as required; and 20. Prior to recordation of the final map, a written certification from the Water District, GTE, SCE, SCG and Adelphia Cable stating that adequate facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed development shall be submitted to the City. Such letter must be issued by the utility company at least 30 days prior to approval of the final map; and 21. A title report/guarantee showing all fee owners' and interest holders must be submitted when a final map is submitted for plan check. This account must remain open until the final map is filed with the County Recorder. An updated title report/guarantee must be submitted ten (10) working days prior to approval of final map; and 22. The final map shall be based on a field survey; and 23. All surveying for the proposed development will be done by the developer, including the establishment of centerline ties; and 24. The surveyor's closure sheets must be enclosed with the final map. 25. New boundary monuments must be set in accordance with the City standards and subject to approval by the City Engineer. 26. All easements existing prior to final map approval must be identified. If an easement is blanket or indeterminate in nature, a statement to that effect must be shown on the final map in lieu of its location. 27. All site grading, landscaping, irrigation, street improvements, sewer and storm drain improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to final map approval. AGP -108, Z -542, DR -28 and TM -62166 February 2, 2005 Page 9 28. Grading plan (24" x 36 ") must be designed in compliance with recommendations of the final detailed soils and engineering geology reports. All remedial earthworks shall be incorporated on the City's standard mylar. Plans shall be submitted on the City's standard mylar. 29. Grading plan must be signed and stamped by a registered Civil Engineer. 30. Provide a sewer plan signed by a registered Civil Engineer, designed and drawn to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Must be submitted if an main line facility is proposed. Each building must have a separate and independent connection to a main line sewer 31. Submit to this office a Soils Report signed by a Registered Soils Engineer /Registered Civil Engineer. 32. The following off -site improvements must be existing or guaranteed for: a) Parcel must have separate and independent connections to the main sewer separate connection of line. b) Install new 8" sewer Line and manhole for the 6" laterals going in each separate unit. c) Remove and replace sections of broken curb and gutter along the frontage of proposed property. d) Provide streetlights for proposed street per City Master Plan. e) Remove existing driveway approaches not being utilized and replace with full height (8" curb). f) All proposed driveway approaches shall meet the ADA requirements. g) Install water services and gas services for the proposed development area. h) Grind 1 1/2 AC and overlay 1 1/2 AC from curb to curb along Maine Avenue: i) Plant two trees along Maine Avenue per City Standard. j) Install Landscaped parkway and irrigation system along Maine Avenue (frontage of proposed development area). 33. The developer shall submit to the City Engineer the total cost estimate for bonding purposes of all off -site improvements prior to approval of the final map; and 34. If the City accepts approval of the final map prior to the completion of all required public improvements, the developer shall enter into a subdivision agreement with the City and shall post the appropriate security; and 35. A copy of the final map reduced to 8 1/2" x 11 " shah be submitted to the Engineering Division prior to meeting with the Zoning Administrator for the subject parcel map; and AGP -108, Z -542, DR -28 and TM- 62166 February 2, 2005 Page 10 36. Approval of this tentative map does not constitute approval of the site plan or building footprints; and 37. The City is being served by a cable TV franchise awarded to Adelphia Cable. All residential units constructed shall be prewired and made ready for cable TV connections; and 38. After the final map records, a mylar and two blue line prints shall be submitted to the Engineering Division at no cost to the City. Final occupancy will not be granted until the recorded map is received by the Engineering Division; and 39. CC & R must be reviewed and `approved by the City Attorney prior to map recordation; and 40. Provide maps in digital format to the County of Los Angeles per County requirement; and 41. The final map must be recorded within 24 months or all proceedings shall be terminated; and 42. That the applicant shall sign a notarized affidavit within twenty (20) days of the date of this resolution stating that the applicant has read and accepts all of the conditions of approval. ATTACHMENTS: #1 Exhibit "A" - Development Plan, dated February 2, 2005 #2 - Exhibit "B" Existing Zoning and Land Use Designations 43 - Exhibit "C" - Proposed Zoning and Land Use Designations #4 - Environmental Data — Draft Negative Declaration and Initial Study #5 - Ordinance 1253 #6 - Resolution 2004 -092 #7 - Resolution 2005 -011 3 ( o 41 Mr. Pedro Maltas s ■# r m-1 �� � cmc H 9959 Marne Avmue Baldwin Park CA 91706 ALTOS VILLAS Tract ® -8414, PG 11, Lot "2 AND 35 ® SANTIAGO CU OM - REMODEL - ADDITIONS ,� } p b � r I - r I 000 n c > I r I^ > I Cp > > } ---------------------------- I BALCONY cn z .H tj > t�> o i > zn I 17' c� z I - I ' i � c lVi9tl71fl H I t � H 0 0 x H • y El 1 _ M 1e I I Z � d w i�\V 5 KZ NZ o 0 n PORCH 0 1i I SANTIAGO DESIGN 1?Rk TiliG5EtiYICE Mc Pedro Maltos 4958 Mine Aveme 6aldu�in Park. CA 91706 z. ALTOS V ILL CLS7 Ot`4 REMODEL ADDITIONS � - n Tract * -8414, PG 11, Lot ^2 AND 35 _ - �" ' ' ' _ ° - °` r. 11111 -I In nlam.nl 11:41 1 ,y^ ---- 7 Rul W-j" DD I I j IT d � C� a a 12 1 1 I I 1 - i F Y I lltA s j 4 I I �� � ,g� t7' J Mc Pedro Maltos c F 4958 Ma , Avenue " SANIAGODESL(I�Ti�RFFTIDC.SRVECt iald«mParkGS9t706 - N�> 1� ALTOS VILLAS CUSTOM - REMODEL - ADDITIONS Tract "-8414, PC 11. Lot 12 AND 35 :.127 + k - rr ;" N7111 is lMM 9114 11%81 0.fe F-,,vil. 1 - 11- -:ircl rin. eo bvi C_ 9 .DWIN AVENUE 1024 5025 5022 5025 ® 144 442 443 443 450 450 451 451 45 452 453 4 018 5019 yJ18 5019 5012 5013 50 5013 A 3008 5009 ll—EO07 450 451 452 4 453 z 5002 5003 5002 14389 ® gAL ®WIN AVENUE ® ® 4976 134,14W 43 14360 > 437 4975 4972 1 442 14428 14436 1450,145D 451 14518 14526 453 453 , ® 4968 QQ� ® ` W 4,960 4964 4963 4956 qc 4954 4961 ® 4958 4959 4950 495; 4955 ® 4952 9 4952 4953 4948 4944 4: 4951 4949 4947 4946 4938 4938 4,942 4941 4942 453 4941 4935 4939 4934 School 4934 4,936 4937 4936 4935 . 49 4931 � 4,933 4.92 4925 4928 49A 4925 ® 4927 4920 4,922 4918 4921 ® 4920 4919 4919 4918 4916 4915. 4917 4914 4915 4912 4912 W4,91 4911 13 4910 4909 4908 4908 4903' 3 4902 SCHOOLST iri�� 4860 AO CITY OF BALDWIN PARK NEGATIVE DECLARATION DATE: February 2, 2005 APPLICANT: Pedro Maltos TYPE OF PERMIT: General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Development Plan and Tentative Tract Map FILE NO.: AGP -108, Z -542, DR -28 and TM- 62166 LOCATION OF PROJECT: 4958 Maine Ave., Baldwin Park, CA 91706 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: A request for approval of an amendment to the City's General Plan Land Use Element to redesignate the subject property from Single- Family Residential to Garden Multi- Family Residential. A Zone Change from R -1, Single- Family Residential to RG(PD), Residential Garden Multi- Family Planned Development. A Development Plan to allow the construction of a four (4) unit single - family detached planned development and common lot. A Tentative Tract Map to subdivide two (2) lots into five (5) lots for residential purposes. It is the opinion of the Zoning Administrator Planning Commission X City Council Other that, upon review of the project, it has determined that the project will not have a significant effect upon the environment. Mitigation Measures are attached RXare not required (Signature) Principal Planner (Title) Date(s) of Public Notice: X Legal advertisement — November 18, 2004 Posting of the properties X Written notice — November 18, 2004 (mswVornas\negdec) 1/97 INITIAL STUDY, ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION 1. Project Title. A request for approval of an amendment to the City's General Plan Land Use Map, to redesignate a portion of the subject property from Single - Family Residential to Multi- Family Residential; a zone change from R -1, Single - Family Residential and R -G, Residential Garden, to RG(PD), Multi- Family Residential Planned Development; a Development Plan to allow the construction of a five (5) unit single- family detached planned development and common lot; and a tentative tract map to subdivide two (2) lots into six (6) lots for residential purposes. 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Baldwin Park- 14403 E. Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, CA 91706 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Salvador Lopez Jr., Assistant Planner (626) 813 -5261 4. Project Location: 4958 Maine Ave. 5, Assessor's Parcel Number: 8414- 011 -002 & 035 6. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Pedro and Martha Maltos 3841 St. James Circle Baldwin Park, CA 91706 7. General Plan Designation: Garden Multi- Family Residential / Single - Family Residential (current) Garden Multi- Family Residential (proposed) 8. Zoning: RG / R -1 (current) RG(PD) (proposed) { 9. Surrounding Land Uses Incorporated in 1956, the City of Baldwin Park is located and Settings: approximately 17 miles east of downtown Los Angeles. The intersection of the 1 -10 (San Bernardino) and I -605 (San Gabriel River) freeways lies near the southwest corner of this 6.8 square mile City. Although Baldwin Park is predominantly a residential bedroom community, recent efforts have placed a greater emphasis on promoting commercial and industrial land uses. However, the City is near "build- out ", focusing efforts on the Redevelopment of land, especially within close proximity to the freeway. According to the 2000 Census, Baldwin Park has approximately 75,900 persons. This is more than double the population in 1960. Baldwin Park is predominantly a Hispanic working class community, although between the 1990 and 2000 Census has experienced a recent increase in its Asian population. Furthermore, the City has a considerably larger than average household size than the County average, suggesting increased pressure on the City's housing stock and the provision of services. gg 5- ulty of Baldwin a r ulty of Baldwin a r 605 _. Santa Fe Dam sy- i Recreation Area e 4 Hwy.. ,�`� Live Oak Ave. ow .. E Los A rgeles S<. a 4F IS 1 Nubu ONie SL— Ov�ova¢9�G® /n c rooks Dr.. �a 1 VJ—H: Ooemr0o-7 �I ! _. 33 .. E Los A rgeles S<. a 1 Ov�ova¢9�G® /n o] -LLt _ 1 �� ' Rartrona eNd / adil` NZ1 g a � / ♦ '� / /�. / City f Wes Co ma i WO�n�]'t G(0aK Wash / t / y / / E z FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION MAP 1024 5025 55022 5025 ® 1" l u 450 450 451 452 453 45 1018 5019 5018 5019 5020 5014 1442 442 443 443 5012 5013 501 5013 (45452 5008 5009 5007 ® 443 443 450 450 451 A4453 5002 5003 5002 14389 ® 14405 77 ® BAUM N AY ® 4,976 134 434 43 14360 > 437 4975 4972 1442 14428 144361450,'14508451 14518 14526 453 Q ® 4968 ® UJ 4960 4964 4963 4956 4� M E 4954 4961 ® 4958 4950 495 8848 4955 ® 4952 4949 4952 4F 4951 4944 - g463 4944 `� 4938 4947 4938 �1 4942 4941 4942 4934 453 ,, School 4934 4,936 4937 4936 C 4931 4933 492 4925 4928 49 4925 ® 4927 4920 4922 4918 4921 . ® 4920 4919 4919 4918 4914 4916 4915 4917 ® 4914 4915 - 4912 4,912 4910 4,911 ® 4910 4909 13 4908 4908 435 436 4903 3 4902 ® 4902 4861 4902 SCFI L T ® 4863 4866 ti 4860 4859 4860 Aa=7 10. Description of Project: Introduction, Purpose and Need for the Project: Recently, the Planning Division has received an application for a Development Plan to develop a five (5) unit single - family detached residential development. Currently, the zoning for the subject property is half RG, Residential Garden and half R -1, Single - Family Residential In order for the development to take place, an Amendment to the City's General Plan and a zone change will be required to redesignate the property from a dual zoning to multi- family residential garden. Additionally, a Zone Change to add a Planned Development (PD) overlay is required. The project will provide additional quality housing stock within the City. Project Characteristics: A request for approval of an amendment to the City's General Plan Land Use Element, to redesignate a portion of the subject property from Single - Family Residential to Multi- Family Residential and a zone change from R -1, Single - Family Residential and R -G, Residential Garden, to R- G(PD), Multi - Family Residential Planned Development. A Development Plan is required to allow the construction of a five (5) unit single- family detached planned development and common lot, pursuant to Section 153.271 of the City's Zoning Code. A related request is for approval of a tentative tract map to subdivide two (2) lots into six (6) lots for residential purposes. 11. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement) No additional public approvals beyond Planning Commission and City Council will be required for this project. 12. References The following are also referenced where appropriate in the Environmental Checklist Form: a. General Plan b. Municipal Code C. Zoning Code d. Emergency Operations Coordinator e. Geological Map— Liquefaction Zones' EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers, except "No Impact answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact' answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact answer should be explained where it is based on project- specific factor as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project- specific screening analysis.) 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including offsite as well as onsite, cumulative as well as project - level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant." "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect maybe significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross - referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiring, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, abrief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and - adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. C) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures, which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site- specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: Explanation of Checklist Judgements: I(a). No Impact. The project will not have an adverse affect on a scenic vista or result in the obstruction of any scenic views. I(b). No Impact. This project will not result in the damage or destruction of scenic resources or historical buildings. I(c). No Impact. This project will not substantially degrade the existing visual character and quality of the City of Baldwin Park. Through the Design Review process, the project has been designed so as to ensure no aesthetic offensive site, building or mechanical equipment will be open to public view. Furthermore, the project is compatible with the surrounding adjacent properties and consistent with the Design Guidelines developed by the City. I(d).. No Impact. This project will not create any new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the residential zones. Less Than Less Than Potentially Significant Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With AESTHETICS Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Impact Mitigation Impact In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are Incorporation Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? El El 1:1 C) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? 11 El 11 d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the 1 area? a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Explanation of Checklist Judgements: I(a). No Impact. The project will not have an adverse affect on a scenic vista or result in the obstruction of any scenic views. I(b). No Impact. This project will not result in the damage or destruction of scenic resources or historical buildings. I(c). No Impact. This project will not substantially degrade the existing visual character and quality of the City of Baldwin Park. Through the Design Review process, the project has been designed so as to ensure no aesthetic offensive site, building or mechanical equipment will be open to public view. Furthermore, the project is compatible with the surrounding adjacent properties and consistent with the Design Guidelines developed by the City. I(d).. No Impact. This project will not create any new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the residential zones. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: II(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not convert any type of farmland to a nonagricultural use. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than II- AGRICULTURE RESOURCES Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project. a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? El 0 b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? C) involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: II(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not convert any type of farmland to a nonagricultural use. II(b). No Impact. The proposed project will not conflict with the existing residential zoning designation, agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract. II(c). No Impact. The project will not result in the conversion of farm land to non - agricultural uses. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: III(a). No Impact. The proposed project does not conflict with any applicable air quality plan. The City of Baldwin Park is located within the South Coast Air Basin which is a non- attainment area for selective pollutants. Air pollution is a regional problem. Pollution levels in Baldwin Park are a result of not only local emissions, but also of those throughout the region. III(b). No Impact. The project will not result in a cumulative net increase of pollutants for which the region is in non - attainment. ILI(c). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the region is in non - attainment. The Southern California Association of Governments and the South Coast Air Quality Management District have adopted a South Coast Air Quality Management Plan (SCAQMP). The proposed project is consistent with that plan and will not have a significant impact upon air quality. However, there will be temporary increases in air pollutant emissions during the construction phase. Construction dust and air pollution, however, will be reduced with the following procedures. Procedures to reduce air pollution include the following: 1) That the applicant adhere to the SCAQMD Rule 403 insuring the clean up construction related dirt on approach routes to the site. 2) The watering techniques shall be employed to partially mitigate the impact of construction generated dust particles. 3) Maintenance and servicing of construction equipment to minimize exhaust emissions. 4) Halting of construction activities during Stage 1 and Stage 2 smog alerts. Potentially Less Than Less Than III AIR QUALITY Significant Significant With Significant No Impact Impact p Mitigation Impact p Incorporation Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relief upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? C) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air El quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: III(a). No Impact. The proposed project does not conflict with any applicable air quality plan. The City of Baldwin Park is located within the South Coast Air Basin which is a non- attainment area for selective pollutants. Air pollution is a regional problem. Pollution levels in Baldwin Park are a result of not only local emissions, but also of those throughout the region. III(b). No Impact. The project will not result in a cumulative net increase of pollutants for which the region is in non - attainment. ILI(c). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the region is in non - attainment. The Southern California Association of Governments and the South Coast Air Quality Management District have adopted a South Coast Air Quality Management Plan (SCAQMP). The proposed project is consistent with that plan and will not have a significant impact upon air quality. However, there will be temporary increases in air pollutant emissions during the construction phase. Construction dust and air pollution, however, will be reduced with the following procedures. Procedures to reduce air pollution include the following: 1) That the applicant adhere to the SCAQMD Rule 403 insuring the clean up construction related dirt on approach routes to the site. 2) The watering techniques shall be employed to partially mitigate the impact of construction generated dust particles. 3) Maintenance and servicing of construction equipment to minimize exhaust emissions. 4) Halting of construction activities during Stage 1 and Stage 2 smog alerts. III(d). No Impact. The proposed project will not expose any nearby sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. III(e). No Impact. The proposed project will not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: IV(a). No Impact. The project will not have any effect on any species identified by the California Department of Fish and Game or the US Fish and Wildlife Service. IV(b). No Impact. The project will not have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in any local or regional plans, policies regulations or by the California Department of Fish and game or by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. IV(c). No Impact. The project will not have a substantial effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. There are no federally protected wetlands within the City of Baldwin Park. IV(d). No Impact_ The project will not interfere with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites as the City of Baldwin Park is within an urbanized area and not within five (5) miles of a wildlife corridor. IV(e). No Impact. The proposed project does not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources as the City of Baldwin Park does not have any ordinances protecting trees, wildlife, etc... Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than IV BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive or special status species in local or El 11 11 regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. C) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, El 11 etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites El e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, El El El or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation Ian? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: IV(a). No Impact. The project will not have any effect on any species identified by the California Department of Fish and Game or the US Fish and Wildlife Service. IV(b). No Impact. The project will not have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in any local or regional plans, policies regulations or by the California Department of Fish and game or by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. IV(c). No Impact. The project will not have a substantial effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. There are no federally protected wetlands within the City of Baldwin Park. IV(d). No Impact_ The project will not interfere with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites as the City of Baldwin Park is within an urbanized area and not within five (5) miles of a wildlife corridor. IV(e). No Impact. The proposed project does not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources as the City of Baldwin Park does not have any ordinances protecting trees, wildlife, etc... IV(f). No Impact. The project proposal will not conflict with any provisions of an adopted habitat conservation plan, natural community conservation plan or any local, regional or state habitat conservation plan, as the City's General plan does not indicate any of the referenced plans which could be affected by the project proposal. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: V(a). No Impact. The project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. V(b). No Impact. The project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource. V(c). No Impact. The project will not directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or geological feature. V(d). No Impact. The project is not expected to disturb any human remains. The City of Baldwin Park does not have any cemeteries. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than V CULTURAL RESOURCES Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project. a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other C) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geological feature? El El El N d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred I outside of formal cemeteries? Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: V(a). No Impact. The project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. V(b). No Impact. The project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource. V(c). No Impact. The project will not directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or geological feature. V(d). No Impact. The project is not expected to disturb any human remains. The City of Baldwin Park does not have any cemeteries. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than VI GEOLOGY AND SOILS Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist - Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. El El N 0 ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic - related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? C) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on or offsite landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or colla se? d), Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 -1 -B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risk to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems Less Than where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? HAZARDS AND Explanation of Checklist Judgements: VI(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects involving the rupture of a known earthquake fault. According to the City's General plan, there are no active faults within the City of Baldwin Park, therefore no Alquist- Priolo Special Study Zones are within the City. Although there are no active faults within the City of Baldwin Park, there are several major faults surrounding the City, which have the potential for causing major damage; however, the occurrence of direct ground rupture is not likely according to the City's General Plan. Potential for this type of activity is similar throughout Southern California and no unique or unusual risk is posed by the proposed project. According to the Seismic Hazard Zones Map dated 3/99 from the State Department of Geology and Mines, the project area is not within a liquefaction zone._ VI(b). No Impact. The City is located in a relatively flat urbanized area with a very low potential for wind and water erosion of soils. VI(c). No Impact. The City is not located on a geological unit or soil that is unstable and could result in landslide, spreading liquefaction or collapse according to the Seismic Hazards Zone Map dated March 25, 1999 from the State geologists Office. VI(d). No Impact. The City and the project area are located on a very low to low expansive soil as defined in Table 18 -1 -B of the UBC (1997). Therefore the project will not create any risk to life or property. VI(e). No Impact. The proposed project's location does have sewers available for the disposal of wastewater. Furthermore, the soils at the proposed location can adequately support the use of the sewers. Less Than VII HAZARDS AND Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact HAZARDOUSIVIATERIALS Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident El 0 conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? C) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one- quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the 2roject area? f) For aproject within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an Less Than adopted emergency response plan or emergency VIII HYDROLOGY AND WATER evacuation Ian? Significant Less Than h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where Significant With Significant wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where Impact residences are intermixed with wildlands? Impact Explanation of Checklist Judgements: VII (a). No Impact. The project will not create a significant hazard to the public through the routine . transport use or disposal of hazardous materials. It is not anticipated that there will be any hazardous materials associated with the proposed project. VII(b). No Impact. There will be no significant hazard to the public or the environment regarding the upset or release of hazardous materials into the environment. VII(c). No Impact. The project will not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous material, substances or waste within one - quarter of an existing school. VII(d). No Impact. The proposed project is not located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous materials sites. VII(e). No Impact. The project is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public airport, and therefore would not create a hazard to people residing or working in the area. ' VII(f). No Impact. Since the project is not within the vicinity of a private airstrip, the project would not create a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area. VII(g). No Impact. According to the City's Emergency Operations Coordinator, the project proposal will not impair implementation or physically interfere with the City's adopted emergency plan or emergency evacuation plan. VII(h). No Impact. The project proposal is within a highly urbanized area and will therefore not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires. Less Than VIII HYDROLOGY AND WATER Potentially Significant Less Than QUALITY Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? C) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on or offsite? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on or offsite? � Explanation of Checklist Judgements: ' ' ' VU|(a)`No Impact. The proposed project will not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements, as the facility will generate minimal amounts of solid vvaohe typical ' for this particular residential use. In addition, the applicant will be nnqU/nod to implement the � requirements of the National Pollution Elimination Discharge System /NP[}ES\, which regulates water quality runoff. ` ` V|/|/b>. NV hnpaoL The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies or interfere with groundwater recharge. ^ VU|(c). NV Impact. The proposed project will not substantially alter the course of an adjacent .. stream or river, which vvou|U result in erosion, or siltation of the site as there is no stream or ' river running through the City, which the exception of the channelized San Gabriel River. VU|(d). No Impact. The proposed project will not oubatanUe/k/ e|bur the drainage patterns 'of the City ~, and will not alter the course ofa stream or river, there are no streams or rivers in the City � with the exception of the ohonno|iz8U San Gabriel River. V|||(e). No Impact. The proposed project will nVtnrAato or contribute run-off, which would exceed ' the capacity ofthe existing storm drain system. Nor will the proposed project provide any ' polluted run-off. V|||(D. No Impact. The project will not degrade the existing water quality because of the limited amount uf impervious surfaces associated with the project. V|||(g). No Impact. The project pnopoea|vviUnoip|aoehoueinQwithina1OO'yeorOoodh@z8njana8. Furthermore, the City is not within a Flood Zone. Federal Emergency Management Association (FEK8A) has the City nf Baldwin Park classified as Zone C--O0O1O0. V!||(h). NO Impact. The proposal is not within 8 100'ye8r flood hazard area. FEK8A has classified the City Of Baldwin Park aS Zone C_-O0O10O. VUKU. No Impact. The project proposal will not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss involving flooding as a direct result of the failure of a levee or dam. Although the Santa Fe dam is located directly adjacent to the City across Arrow Highway, large-scale flooding as a result of failure of this particular dam is negligible due to the design of the dam in that water ia present in the dam only a few months of the year. Less Than Vill HYDROLOGY AND WATER Potentially Significant Less Than QUALITY Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. El 1:1 1:1 f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? El h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? El El j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: ' ' ' VU|(a)`No Impact. The proposed project will not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements, as the facility will generate minimal amounts of solid vvaohe typical ' for this particular residential use. In addition, the applicant will be nnqU/nod to implement the � requirements of the National Pollution Elimination Discharge System /NP[}ES\, which regulates water quality runoff. ` ` V|/|/b>. NV hnpaoL The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies or interfere with groundwater recharge. ^ VU|(c). NV Impact. The proposed project will not substantially alter the course of an adjacent .. stream or river, which vvou|U result in erosion, or siltation of the site as there is no stream or ' river running through the City, which the exception of the channelized San Gabriel River. VU|(d). No Impact. The proposed project will not oubatanUe/k/ e|bur the drainage patterns 'of the City ~, and will not alter the course ofa stream or river, there are no streams or rivers in the City � with the exception of the ohonno|iz8U San Gabriel River. V|||(e). No Impact. The proposed project will nVtnrAato or contribute run-off, which would exceed ' the capacity ofthe existing storm drain system. Nor will the proposed project provide any ' polluted run-off. V|||(D. No Impact. The project will not degrade the existing water quality because of the limited amount uf impervious surfaces associated with the project. V|||(g). No Impact. The project pnopoea|vviUnoip|aoehoueinQwithina1OO'yeorOoodh@z8njana8. Furthermore, the City is not within a Flood Zone. Federal Emergency Management Association (FEK8A) has the City nf Baldwin Park classified as Zone C--O0O1O0. V!||(h). NO Impact. The proposal is not within 8 100'ye8r flood hazard area. FEK8A has classified the City Of Baldwin Park aS Zone C_-O0O10O. VUKU. No Impact. The project proposal will not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss involving flooding as a direct result of the failure of a levee or dam. Although the Santa Fe dam is located directly adjacent to the City across Arrow Highway, large-scale flooding as a result of failure of this particular dam is negligible due to the design of the dam in that water ia present in the dam only a few months of the year. VIII(j). No Impact. Since Baldwin Park is an inland City, it could not experience a tsunami and the few bodies of water in Baldwin Park are small enough that they would not be able to produce a seiche large enough to cause any damage. Furthermore, Baldwin Park is an urbanized City with no hillsides to speak of and therefore, damage caused by mudflow would be negligible. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: IX(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Zone Change and General Plan Amendment will not physically divide an established community but will increase the allowable density previously allowed in the single- family residential zone. The maximum permitted density for the current single - family zoning is 0 to 8.7 du /ac. The maximum permitted density for the newly created residential garden zoning will be 8.8 to 12 du /ac. This increase in moderate density will allow for the construction of a five (5) unit residential planned development provided that the development meets all standards and criteria set forth in the City's Zoning Code and Design Guidelines. Once the zoning on the said parcel is changed, pursuant to this approval, the lots will share a common rear lot line with an R -1 zoned lot. In order to lessen the effects of multi - family developments, the City's Zoning Code requires, as part of the development standards, a rear yard depth of not less than twenty (20) feet. This project provides for the minimum twenty foot setback as required of the City's Zoning Code. IX(b). No Impact. The proposed project is not in conflict with any land use plan, policy or regulation of an agency that has jurisdiction over the project, in that the City has initiated an amendment to the City's General Plan Land Use Element to redesignate the adjacent properties from single - family residential to multi- family residential garden. Thus, not creating any conflict with the land use map (proposed to be amended) once the City initiated request is approved. IX(c). No Impact. Currently the City has no habitat conservation plans or natural community conservation plans which would possible be affected by the proposed project. Less Than Less Than Potentially Significant Potentially Significant Less Than Significant IX LAND USE AND PLANNING Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Would the project: Incorporation a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents Would the project: b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general a) Physically divide an established community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? C) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: IX(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Zone Change and General Plan Amendment will not physically divide an established community but will increase the allowable density previously allowed in the single- family residential zone. The maximum permitted density for the current single - family zoning is 0 to 8.7 du /ac. The maximum permitted density for the newly created residential garden zoning will be 8.8 to 12 du /ac. This increase in moderate density will allow for the construction of a five (5) unit residential planned development provided that the development meets all standards and criteria set forth in the City's Zoning Code and Design Guidelines. Once the zoning on the said parcel is changed, pursuant to this approval, the lots will share a common rear lot line with an R -1 zoned lot. In order to lessen the effects of multi - family developments, the City's Zoning Code requires, as part of the development standards, a rear yard depth of not less than twenty (20) feet. This project provides for the minimum twenty foot setback as required of the City's Zoning Code. IX(b). No Impact. The proposed project is not in conflict with any land use plan, policy or regulation of an agency that has jurisdiction over the project, in that the City has initiated an amendment to the City's General Plan Land Use Element to redesignate the adjacent properties from single - family residential to multi- family residential garden. Thus, not creating any conflict with the land use map (proposed to be amended) once the City initiated request is approved. IX(c). No Impact. Currently the City has no habitat conservation plans or natural community conservation plans which would possible be affected by the proposed project. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than X (MINERAL RESOURCES Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general Ian, specific plan, or other land use Ian? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: X(a). No Impact. The project will not result in the loss of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region or the residents of the State. There are no known mineral resources located within the City of Baldwin Park according to the City's General Plan. X(b). No Impact. The project will not result in the loss of a locally important mineral resource recovery site, as the City's General Plan does not indicate any known mineral resources. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XI(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not result in the exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the City's General Plan, noise ordinance or applicable standards of other agencies. Noise levels would increase temporarily during the construction phase of the project. Construction is regulated by the City and is addressed in the Municipal Code to limit overall noise levels to an acceptable range. Increased population and development will result in increasing noise from a variety of sources commonly found in an urban environment (human activities, mechanical equipment, automobiles, pets, etc.). This increase is considered to be less than significant: XI(b). No Impact. The project will not result in the exposure of persons to generation of excess ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels. XI(c). No Impact. The project will not result in a substantial permanent increase of ambient noise levels. XI(d). No Impact. The project will not result in a substantial or periodic increase in ambient noise levels above levels that exist. XI(e). No Impact. The City of Baldwin Park is not located within an airport land use plan not within two miles of an airport. Therefore, the amendment will not expose people to excessive noise levels. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than X11 NOISE Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? El El b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground vibration borne or ground borne noise levels? C) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XI(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not result in the exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the City's General Plan, noise ordinance or applicable standards of other agencies. Noise levels would increase temporarily during the construction phase of the project. Construction is regulated by the City and is addressed in the Municipal Code to limit overall noise levels to an acceptable range. Increased population and development will result in increasing noise from a variety of sources commonly found in an urban environment (human activities, mechanical equipment, automobiles, pets, etc.). This increase is considered to be less than significant: XI(b). No Impact. The project will not result in the exposure of persons to generation of excess ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels. XI(c). No Impact. The project will not result in a substantial permanent increase of ambient noise levels. XI(d). No Impact. The project will not result in a substantial or periodic increase in ambient noise levels above levels that exist. XI(e). No Impact. The City of Baldwin Park is not located within an airport land use plan not within two miles of an airport. Therefore, the amendment will not expose people to excessive noise levels. XI(f)., No Impact. The City of Baldwin Park is not within the vicinity of a private airstrip. Therefore, the amendment will not expose people to excessive noise levels. El El Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XII(a). Less Than Significant impact. The provision of five (5) residential units will increase the population of the area, which may result in higher levels of traffic and increased demands on municipal agencies. The increase in population will not create a significant impact. According to the Population and Housing_ Estimates for Individual Counties from the Department of Finance, a slight increase would be expected to occur with an average of 4.4 persons per dwelling, which creates an approximate increase of twenty -two (22) persons. The potential result of increased manpower and equipment needed to serve citywide demands are evaluated annually. The provision of five (5) residential units is considered a beneficial impact. The project is in compliance with the City's General Plan. XII(b). No Impact. The proposed project will not displace any existing housing units that will necessitate the replacement or construction of residential units. XII(c). No Impact. The proposed project will not displace substantial number of individuals /families necessitating the construction of replacement housing as the development will be in compliance with the General Plan and applicable zoning regulations: Less Than Less Than Potentially Significant Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Xi[ POPULATION AND HOUSING Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Would the project: result in substantial adverse physical impacts Incorporation Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable roads or other infrastructure)? service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing any of the public services? elsewhere? El 0 El 0 a) Fire protection? C) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the C) . Schools? construction of replacement housing elsewhere? e) Other public facilities? El El Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XII(a). Less Than Significant impact. The provision of five (5) residential units will increase the population of the area, which may result in higher levels of traffic and increased demands on municipal agencies. The increase in population will not create a significant impact. According to the Population and Housing_ Estimates for Individual Counties from the Department of Finance, a slight increase would be expected to occur with an average of 4.4 persons per dwelling, which creates an approximate increase of twenty -two (22) persons. The potential result of increased manpower and equipment needed to serve citywide demands are evaluated annually. The provision of five (5) residential units is considered a beneficial impact. The project is in compliance with the City's General Plan. XII(b). No Impact. The proposed project will not displace any existing housing units that will necessitate the replacement or construction of residential units. XII(c). No Impact. The proposed project will not displace substantial number of individuals /families necessitating the construction of replacement housing as the development will be in compliance with the General Plan and applicable zoning regulations: Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XIII(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project should not result in the additional need for new or altered fire protection and will not alter acceptable service ratios or response Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than X1111 PUBLIC SERVICES Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services? El El 0 El 0 a) Fire protection? b) Police protection? C) . Schools? d) Parks? e) Other public facilities? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XIII(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project should not result in the additional need for new or altered fire protection and will not alter acceptable service ratios or response times. Whether or not the project would require additional police service or fire staff depends on the total requirements of the City and County. Currently the City is served by Station 29, which is located at Los Angeles Street and Maine Avenue., XIII(b). Less Than Significant Impact. Public services are already in place to serve this development. An increase in public services would be considered less than significant. The project may result in some increase in police calls. XIII(c). Less Than Significant Impact. The net impact of the project on the school facilities will be minimal. There would be a slight increase in local school enrollment. If viewed as an isolated occurrence, the project would result in an estimated increase in population of up to 22 persons (5 units x 4.4 persons per unit) with up to nine (9) school -aged children (40% of the total between the ages of 0 -20). School impact fees collected prior to occupancy are intended to offset any potential demand for new school facilities. School Development fees in the amount of $2.14 /s.f. shall be paid to the Baldwin Park Unified School District prior to obtaining building permits. These fees are considered to provide full and complete school facilities. XIII(d). Less Than Significant Impact. Although residential development for this proposed project will increase the population, the project is not expected to significantly impact the City's existing parks or recreational facilities. The City's Development Tax collected prior to occupancy is intended to offset any potential demand for recreational facilities. XIII(e). No Impact. The proposed project will not require the need for new or physically altered public facilities. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XIV(a). No Impact. The proposed project is not expected to significantly impact the City's existing parks or recreational facilities. XIV(b). No Impact. The proposed project does not require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than XIV RECREATION Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or facility would occur or be accelerated? congestion at intersections)? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? management agency for designated roads or highways? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XIV(a). No Impact. The proposed project is not expected to significantly impact the City's existing parks or recreational facilities. XIV(b). No Impact. The proposed project does not require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than XV TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project. a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? C) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results Be served L in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses e.., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? . g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XV(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will result in an estimated increase in traffic generated by the net gain of 5 residential units, which will be less than a significant impact. XV(b). No Impact. The proposal will not exceed a, level of service standard established by the County Congestion Management Agency for designated roads or highways, XV(c). No Impact. The proposal will not result in a change or increase in air traffic patterns or levels that result in substantial safety risks. XV(d). No Impact. The proposal will not increase hazards due to a design feature or incompatible uses, as the project does not include new construction of streets. XV(e). No Impact. The project will not result in inadequate emergency access. XV(f). No Impact. The proposed project will not have an impact on existing parking facilities or create a need for new parking as the site meets the required parking standards contained within the Municipal Code. Private parking areas contained within the required two car garages will be provided for each dwelling unit as well as guest parking. XV(g). No Impact. The proposed project will not conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation. a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? f) B Be served L Less Than VI UTILITIES AND SERVICE Potentially significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact SYSTEMS Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? C) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the rovider's existing commitments? by f) B Be served L LJ Li Li Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XVI(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. XVI(b). No Impact. The proposed project will not require the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or the expansion of existing facilities. XVI(c). No Impact. The project site is not within a flood zone area. The increase in impervious surfaces primarily due to the proposed street will marginally increase runoff from the project area. The project will be required to provide satisfactory drainage to available storm drains. XVI(d). No Impact. The project will not affect existing water supplies provided to the City. XVI(e). No Impact. The proposed amendment does not involve a project that will result in a; determination by the watershed treatment provider that it has adequate capacity to serve a demand. XVI(f). Less Than Significant Impact. A net gain in 5 residential units will increase the demand for solid waste disposal; however, the level of solid waste generation is small in comparison to total solid waste disposal on a regional level. The City in an effort to reduce the amount of solid waste disposed, currently provides recycling containers to residents for the recycling of paper; glass, plastic and aluminum. Waste Management, the City waste hauler utilizes the Puente Hills landfill which has enough permitted capacity to accommodate the proposed` project's waste disposal needs. XVI(g). No Impact. The proposed project will comply with all federal, state and local statutes relating to solid waste: Less Than Less Than �(V[ UTILITIES AND SERVICE Potentially Significant Less Than Significant SYSTEMS Significant With Significant No Impact With Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Mitigation Incorporation g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations to waste? related solid LJ Li Li Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XVI(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. XVI(b). No Impact. The proposed project will not require the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or the expansion of existing facilities. XVI(c). No Impact. The project site is not within a flood zone area. The increase in impervious surfaces primarily due to the proposed street will marginally increase runoff from the project area. The project will be required to provide satisfactory drainage to available storm drains. XVI(d). No Impact. The project will not affect existing water supplies provided to the City. XVI(e). No Impact. The proposed amendment does not involve a project that will result in a; determination by the watershed treatment provider that it has adequate capacity to serve a demand. XVI(f). Less Than Significant Impact. A net gain in 5 residential units will increase the demand for solid waste disposal; however, the level of solid waste generation is small in comparison to total solid waste disposal on a regional level. The City in an effort to reduce the amount of solid waste disposed, currently provides recycling containers to residents for the recycling of paper; glass, plastic and aluminum. Waste Management, the City waste hauler utilizes the Puente Hills landfill which has enough permitted capacity to accommodate the proposed` project's waste disposal needs. XVI(g). No Impact. The proposed project will comply with all federal, state and local statutes relating to solid waste: Less Than X VII, MANDATORY FINDINGS OF Potentially Significant Less Than SIGNIFICANCE- Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Does the project: a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ( "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) C) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either direct) or indirect) Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XVII(a). No Impact. The proposed project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self - sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of major periods of California history or prehistory. XVII(b). No Impact. The project does not have impacts that are individually limited by cumulatively considerable. A majority of the environmental factors analyzed within this initial study will have an impact by the proposed project. XVII(c). No Impact. The project does not create environmental effects, which_ will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. ORDINANCE NO. 1253 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ADOPTING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT, REDESIGNATING A PORTION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO GARDEN MULTI- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND A ZONE CHANGE FROM R -1, SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO RG(PD), RESIDENTIAL GARDEN MULTI - FAMILY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR THE ENTIRE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4958 MAINE AVENUE (APPLICANT: PEDRO AND MARTHA MALTOS; CASE NO.: AGP -108 AND Z- 542),, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby find, determine and declare as follows: a) That the City of Baldwin Park filed an application for an amendment to the City's General Plan Land Use Element and a zone change from R -1, Single Family Residential RG, Residential Garden for real property located at 4958 Maine Avenue shown as Parcels 2 and 35 on page 11 of Map Book 8414 of the Los' Angeles County Assessor's Records, described more particularly in the said application which is on file in the office of the Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City; and b) That pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Planning and Zoning Law (Sections 658000 et seq. of the Government Code of the State of California), studies were commenced for the purposes of amending the Zoning Map of the City of Baldwin Park; and c) That a duly noticed public hearing was held upon said matter by the Planning Commission, and based upon the evidence presented, it was determined` that the public necessity, convenience, and general welfare warranted that it recommend approval of the reclassification to RG(PD); and d) That the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said matter and based upon the evidence presented and each member of the Council being familiar with the site, it was determined that the public interest, necessity, convenience and general welfare warrant the approval of the Planning Commission recommendation and approval of an amendment to the General Plan and a change in zone classification, herein described from R -1 to RG(PD). SECTION 2. That notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 153.630 - 153.646 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code, the Zoning Classification of the property be and is hereby reclassified from R -1 to zone RG(PD). Ordinance 1253 SECTION 3. That the City Council at the time of the public hearing on the above matter reviewed and considered the proposed Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact, and comments relating thereto. That the City Council, based on its public review, does hereby approve the proposed Negative Declaration, since there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant impact upon the environment. SECTION 4. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause a copy of the same to be published in a manner prescribed by law, and shall forward a copy of the same to the Secretary of the Planning Commission. The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall file the Notice of Determination and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact. PASSED AND APPROVED ON THE 2nd day of February 2005 MANUEL LOZANO, MAYOR ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss: CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ) I, ROSEMARY RAMIREZ, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was regularly introduced for first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on February 2, 2005. That thereafter said Ordinance was duly approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on , 2005 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBER: NOES: COUNCILMEMBER: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBER: ROSEMARY RAMIREZ, CMC CHIEF DEPUTY CITY CLERK RESOLUTION 2004 -092 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN ALLOWING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A FOUR (4) UNIT SINGLE- FAMILY DETACHED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO SUBDIVIDE TWO (2) LOTS INTO FIVE (5) LOTS FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES (APPLICANT: PEDRO AND MARTHA MALTOS; CASE NO.: DR -28 AND TM- 62166; LOCATION: 4958 MAINE AVENUE)" THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby find, determine, and declare as follows: a) That an application ( "Application ") for a Development Plan was submitted on behalf of the owners of certain real property, located at 4958 Maine Avenue in the City of Baldwin Park, described more particularly in the Applications on file with the Planning Division; and b) That the "Development Plan is requesting approval to allow the construction of a four (4) unit Single - Family Detached Planned Development pursuant to Government Code Section 65450; and c) That an application ( "Application ") for a Tentative Tract Map was submitted on behalf of the owners of certain real property, located at 4958 Maine Avenue in the City of Baldwin Park, described more particularly in the Applications on file with the Engineering Division; and d) That the tentative Tract Map is requesting approval to allow the subdivision of two (2) existing lots into five (5) lots for residential purposes; and e) That on November 10, 2004, a duly noticed public hearing was held on said Applications by the Planning Commission, and based upon evidence presented including applicable staff reports and each member of the Commission being familiar with the properties, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the Development Plan and Tentative Tract Map; and f) That a duly noticed public hearing was held on said Applications by the City Council, and based upon evidence presented including applicable staff reports and each member of the Council being familiar with the properties, it was determined that the facts as required by the Baldwin Park Municipal Code for the granting of such Applications are present and that the Development Plan and Tentative Tract Map should be approved. Resolution 2004 -092 Page 2 SECTION 2. That the Development Plan and Tentative Tract Map, as herein described by and the same hereby is approved subject to the following conditions of approval. a) That the subject Property shall be developed and maintained in substantial compliance with Exhibit "A", of the staff report dated February 2, 2005, except as modified herein by these conditions; and b) That electric garage door openers shall be provided for each unit; and c) That sectional roll -up garage doors shall be provided for each unit; and d) That all landscaped areas must be separated from vehicular areas by a 6" continuous concrete curb; and e)` That a decorative block wall shall be provided surrounding the property. Decorative block walls with brick cap will be required along all exterior property lines that are visible from the public right -of -way and the common driveway, proposed materials are subject to Planning Division approval. Interior property line delineator walls shall be precision block with a brick cap; and f) Each of the homes shall be provided with decorative motion sensor lights at each garage and main level entrance door. Exterior lighting shall be decorative and automatically controlled. Manufacturer's literature shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval when plan are submitted to the Building Division for plan check; and g) Each unit shall be pre -wired for an alarm system; and h) A detailed landscaping plan shall be provided indicating the size, location, and species of all trees, shrubs, ground cover, and any other plan life proposed. This plan shall be submitted during plan check phase; and i) All Landscaping shall be automatically irrigated and a detailed irrigation plan shall be submitted during the plan check phase; and j) That the applicant shall submit a copy of the proposed covenants, conditions and restrictions to the Planning Division prior to obtaining building permits; and k) That the CC &R's shall reflect that any future addition to individual units shall be limited to a patio cover which shall not exceed 25% of the rear yard area and shall meet all zoning code requirements; and Resolution 2004 -092 Page 3 1) That the CC &R's shall reflect that vehicular parking within identified guest parking stalls shall not exceed seven (7) continuous days within a thirty (30) day period; and m) That all utilities shall be undergrounded. This includes utility connections to each individual unit, as well as along the frontage of the property along Maine Ave; and n) Provide the following information upon the Plan Check submittal: 1. Three (3) architectural plans and one (1) extra site plan for the Fire Department 2. Three (3) complete sets of Plans for the City. 3. Two sets of the following are required: i. Soil Reports ii. Structural Calculations iii. Title 24 Energy Calculations o) That the applicant shall comply with all Los Angeles County Fire Department comments; and p) All conditions of the State Map Subdivision Act and City's Subdivision Ordinance must be met prior to recordation; and q) All conditions of the Los Angeles County Fire Department must be met prior to recordation. A written notification or approval plan from the Fire Department must be submitted to the City; and r) All special assessments and utilities or sewer connection fees are to be paid prior to recording the final map; and s) The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including water, gas, electricity, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the respective utility companies' standards. Easements shall be provided as required and t) Prior to recordation of the final map, a written certification from the Water District, GTE, SCE, SCG and Adelphia Cable stating that adequate facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed development shall be submitted to the City. Such letter must be issued by the utility company at least 30 days prior to approval of the final map; and • title repo • uarantee showing all fee owners and interest holders must " submitted .• is submitted for plan check. • i must remain open until the final map is filed with the County Recorder. A updated title repo • u arantee must be submitted ten f ) working days prior to approval of .r and Resolution 2004 -092 Page 4 v) The final map shall be based on a field survey; and w) All surveying for the proposed development will be done by the developer, including the establishment of centerline ties; and x) The surveyor's closure sheets must be enclosed with the final map; and y) New boundary monuments must be set in accordance with the City standards and subject to approval by the City Engineer; and z) All easements existing prior to final map approval must be identified. If an easement is blanket or indeterminate in nature, a statement to that effect must be shown on the final map in lieu of its location; and aa) _ All site grading, landscaping, irrigation, street improvements, sewer and storm drain improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to final map approval; and bb) Grading plan (24 x 36 ") must be designed in compliance with recommendations of the final detailed soils and engineering geology reports. All remedial earthworks shall be incorporated on the City's standard mylar. Plans shall be submitted on the City's standard mylar; and cc) Grading plan must be signed and stamped by a registered Civil Engineer; and dd) Provide a sewer plan signed by a registered Civil Engineer, designed and drawn to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Must be submitted if an on -site main line facility is proposed. Each building must have a separate and independent connection to a main line sewer; and ee) Submit to this office a Soils Report signed by a Registered Soils Engineer /Registered Civil Engineer; and ff) The following off -site improvements must be existing or guaranteed for: 1. Parcel must have separate and independent connections to the main sewer separate connection of line. 2. Install new 8" sewer line and manhole for the 6" laterals going in each separate unit. 3. Remove and replace sections of broken curb and gutter along the frontage of proposed property. 4. Provide streetlights for proposed street per City Master Plan. 5. Remove existing driveway approaches not being utilized and replace with full height (8" curb). 6. All proposed driveway approaches shall meet the ADA requirements. Resolution 2004 -092 Page 5 i. Install water services and gas services for the proposed development area. 8. Grind 1 1/2 AC and overlay 1 1/2 AC from curb to curb along Maine Avenue. 9. Plant two trees along Maine Avenue per City Standard. 10.lnstall landscaped parkway and irrigation system along Maine Avenue (frontage of proposed development area). gg) The developer shall submit to the City Engineer the total cost estimate for bonding purposes of all off -site improvements prior to approval of the final map; and hh) If the City accepts approval of the final map prior to the completion of all required public improvements, the developer shall enter into a subdivision agreement with the City and shall post the appropriate security; and ii) A copy of the final map reduced to 8 1/2" x 11 ° shall be submitted to the Engineering Division prior to meeting with the Zoning Administrator for the subject parcel map; and jj) Approval of this tentative map does not constitute approval of the site plan or building footprints; and kk) The City is being served by a cable TV franchise awarded to Adelphia Cable. All residential units constructed shall be prewired and made ready for cable TV connections; and II) After the final map records, a mylar and two blue line prints shall be submitted to the Engineering Division at no cost to the City. Final occupancy will not be granted until the recorded map is received by the Engineering Division; and mm) CC & R must be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney prior to map recordation; and nn) Provide maps in digital format to the County of Los Angeles per County requirement; and oo) The final map must be recorded within 24 months or all proceedings shall be terminated; and pp) That the applicant shall sign a notarized affidavit within twenty (20) days of the date of this resolution stating that the applicant has read and accepts all of the conditions of approval. SECTION 3. That the City Council at the time of the public hearing on the abova matter reviewed and considered the proposed Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact. .'. Council, based upon its public does •.• r said Negative D ' l r: ' . • has been prepared r •; was • • r r. •': pursuant • a. provisions and guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act, and hereby adopts the Resolution 2004 -092 Page 6 Negative Declaration since there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant impact on the environment. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the `adoption of this Resolution and forward a copy hereof to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and the Applicant. PASSED AND APPROVED this 2nd day of February 2005. MANUEL LOZANO MAYOR ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ) 1, ROSEMARY RAMIREZ, Chief Deputy City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park at a regular meeting of the City Council on February 2, 2005, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ROSEMARY RAMIREZ, CMG CHIEF DEPUTY CITY CLERK RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -011 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT, REDESIGNATING PROPERTY FROM SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO GARDEN MULTI- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (APPLICANT: PEDRO MALTOS; LOCATION: 4958 MAINE AVENUE; CASE NUMBERS AGP -108, Z -542, DR -28, AND TM- 62166). WHEREAS, the Applicant is proposing to develop the property located at 4958 Maine Avenue with a four (4) unit detached residential planned development; and WHEREAS, the project proposal requires approval of a general plan amendment and several other entitlements; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby find, determine, and declare as follows: a) That the request for approval to change the General Plan Land Use designation on a portion of the subject property from Single - Family Residential to Garden Multi - Family Residential was made by the Applicant, Pedro Maltos; and b) That this request for approval is one of the requisites to the development of the property with a four (4) unit planned development located at 4958 Maine Avenue in the City of Baldwin Park, described more particularly in the Applications on file with the Planning Division; and c) That a duly noticed public hearing was held by the City Council on a proposed Negative Declaration for the project, and based upon evidence presented, including applicable staff reports and each member of the Council being familiar with the property, project, and initial study, it was determined that the Negative Declaration be approved and that the proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment. SECTION 2. The City Council does hereby approve the amendment to the City's General Plan attached hereto as Exhibit A. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and forward a copy hereof to the Secretary of the Planning Commission. PASSED AND APPROVED this 2nd day of February 2005. MANUEL LOZANO, MAYOR ATTEST: ROSEMARY RAMIREZ, CMC CHIEF DEPUTY CITY CLERK STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) SS. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ) L, ROSEMARY RAMIREZ, CMC, Chief Deputy City Clerk, of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. PC 2005 -011 was duly and regularly approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 2nd day of February, 2005 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBER: NOES: COUNCILMEMBER: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBER: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER: ROSEMARY RAMIREZ, CMC CHIEF DEPUTY CITY CLERK 4 024 5025 �� ! ' • ! -M18 ' ! ! 015013 , 1144214421"4431"4 451 !! !, !, m — 144�)5 74631, BALDWIN AVENUE 134,14M 143,5114360 > 1437C 4975 . °' mw It'O 4964 4963 m ® r- �- ''w 1 - 4938 � m 4-%9 Mg 1]453 4934 School 4934 4936 4937 4936 LC1411 r-(0)T. R 'K 490 4925 , 4927 i •/ — OS ® ®® 4916 4915 - 4914 4,915 4912 ...• 4910 ® �9 ,�.. 4908 - • •!! 3 4902 4902 4861 4902 SCHWL ! - 86 PURPOSE This report requests City Council consideration of a request for approval of: 1) A Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact; and 2) A Zone Change- from R -G, Residential Garden, to R -G (PD), Residential Garden Planned Development, pursuant to Sections 153.630 and 153.631 of the City's Municipal Code; and 3) A Development Plan to allow the construction of an nine (9) unit single- family detached planned development and common lot, pursuant to Section 153.271 of the City's Zoning Code; and 4) A Tentative Tract Map to subdivide two (2) lots into ten (10) lots for residential purposes, pursuant to Section 152.07 of the City's Municipal Code. CE NOTICING The requisite 21 -day notice period as required by State Law is evidenced by a Notice of Public Hearing published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune on September 22, 2004, and mailed to all property owners within a 300 -foot radius of the subject properties on September 22, 2004. The Planning Division has completed an environmental analysis, and has determined that the project will not have a significant impact upon the environment. Pursuant to that Z -541, DR -27, and TM -61281 February 2, 2005 Page 2 information, a Draft Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact has been prepared pending approval by the City Council. BACKGROUND INFORMATION FOR SUBJECT PROPERTY The subject property's General Plan Land Use designation is Garden Multi- Family Residential and is consistent with the R -G, Residential Garden zoning designation. The properties are rectangular in shape and contain approximately 45,002 square feet (1.03 acres) of combined area. The total site area is essentially flat and contains four (4) dwelling units. The adjacent zoning and land uses are listed in the table below. TABLE 1 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON ORIGINAL ELEVEN UNIT SUBMITTAL The Developer's original submittal consisted of eleven (11) detached units in a Planned Unit Development setting. Each unit would have access from a common driveway with access to Breese Street. Two common open space areas totaling 2,230 s.f. were identified on the site plan as well as fourteen (14) guest parking stalls. The average lot size for the eleven (11) unit project is approximately 2,252 s.f. and the average size of the private open space areas for each of the units is 1,183 s.f. Additional specifics regarding the proposal are shown on the next page. TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF BRESEE STREET ELEVEN UNIT PROJECT Square Footage Private Open Lot # of lots Space Area Square Footage of Homes Ist Level * ** 2nd level - Total 1 2,019 700 866 1,197 2,063 2 2,483 1,064 913' 998 1,911 3 , 2,482 1,064 759 1,121 1,880 4 1,962 545 913 998 1,911 5 ` 2,509 1,134 759 1,121 1,880 6 2,210 860 913 998 1,911 7 2,362 1,250 759 1,121 1,880 8 1,958 545 913 998 1,911 9 2,478 1,889 759 1,121 1,880 CAArnyWMY\WORD \Reports \Council Reports\Z -541 and DR- 27 -3.doc Z -541, DR -27, and TM -61281 February 2, 2005 Page 3 * *Only includes usable open space areas: ** *Does not include garage area. After the City Council considered all of the information presented, including staff reports, and public testimony, they directed the Developer to reduce the number of units within the project from eleven (11) units to nine (9) units. DISCUSSION As a result of the prior City Council meeting, the Developer submitted a schematic nine (9) unit project for staff to review prior to their architect completing the final drawings. As shown in Table #2, each of the proposed lots has a net area in excess of 3,000s.f. Compared against the lot sizes shown in Table #1, there is an average increase in- net lot size of approximately 1,018s.f. per lot. Table #2 also shows that each lot (with the exception of Lot #9) has over 1,200s.f. of private open space area. This is an average increase of approximately 300s.f. when compared against the eleven (11) unit project. Furthermore, there is a substantial distance between the homes, an average of approximately 22 feet, which is shown on Exhibit `A', Development Plan. TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF BRESEE STREET NINE UNIT PROJECT Square Footage Private Open Lot # of lots Space Area Square Footage of Homes 10 2,292 1,911 913 998 1,911 11 2,021 2,063 866 1,197 2,063 Average 2,252.36 1,183.27 Common Area* 20,209 Usable Common Ist Level * ** 2nd level Areas ** 1 2,230 *lnrhA -.q vehicular rlrivec nnect narkinn nnrt ucahla nnon anaca nraac * *Only includes usable open space areas: ** *Does not include garage area. After the City Council considered all of the information presented, including staff reports, and public testimony, they directed the Developer to reduce the number of units within the project from eleven (11) units to nine (9) units. DISCUSSION As a result of the prior City Council meeting, the Developer submitted a schematic nine (9) unit project for staff to review prior to their architect completing the final drawings. As shown in Table #2, each of the proposed lots has a net area in excess of 3,000s.f. Compared against the lot sizes shown in Table #1, there is an average increase in- net lot size of approximately 1,018s.f. per lot. Table #2 also shows that each lot (with the exception of Lot #9) has over 1,200s.f. of private open space area. This is an average increase of approximately 300s.f. when compared against the eleven (11) unit project. Furthermore, there is a substantial distance between the homes, an average of approximately 22 feet, which is shown on Exhibit `A', Development Plan. TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF BRESEE STREET NINE UNIT PROJECT CAAmy\AMY\WORD \Reports \Council Reports\Z -541 and DR- 27 -3.doc Private Open Square Footage Space Area Lot # of lots Square Footage Square Footage of Homes Ist Level * ** 2nd level Total 1 4,000 1,222 866 1,197 2,063 2 3,462 2,003 913 998 1,911 3 3,024 1,680 759 1,121 1,880 4 3,161 1,784 759 1,121 1,880 5 3,097 1,554 913 998 1,911 6 3,108 1,750 759 1,121 1,880 7 3,018 1,692 759 1,121 1,880 8 - 3,063 1,349 913 998 1,911 9 3,503 580 866 1,197 2,063 Average 3,270.67 1,512.67 CAAmy\AMY\WORD \Reports \Council Reports\Z -541 and DR- 27 -3.doc Z-541, DR-27, and TM-61281 February 2, 2005 Page 4 Common Area* 15,546 Usable Common Areas" 1,800 Includes vehicular drives, guest parking, and usable open space areas **Only includes usable open space areas. ***Does not include garage area. ALTERNATIVE In the alternative of the developer's request, the developer has the option to construct a maximum of twelve apartments or condominiums, provided that he meets all of the zoning requirements (i.e. common and private open space, guest parking, setbacks, etc...) and design guidelines. Furthermore, if the developer meets all of the requirements and design guidelines, the project would not require any entitlements and would therefore not be scheduled for Planning Commission or City Council review. ZONE CHANGE The Zone Change is the prerequisite to the preparation of the subject property for the proposed construction of a nine (9) single-family detached planned development and common lot. The current R-G zoning of the property does allow for residential developments but the Planned Development (PD) designation allows for more flexible development standards to encourage and achieve innovative developments exhibiting a superior architecture and site design quality. Furthermore, the construction of a nine (9) unit single-family housing project and a common lot will provide adequate residential sites through appropriate land use and zoning designation to accommodate the City's regional share of housing needs which is consistent with Goal 1.0 of the Housing and Land Use Elements of the General Plan. The Planned Development Zone contains a provision that requires approval of a Development Plan before building permits can be issued. Where such a Plan has been approved, the development standards of the underlying zone shall be excluded and superseded by the conditions and standards of the Development Plan. The applicant is proposing to construct a nine (9) unit single-family detached housing development with a common lot. According to the plans submitted to the Planning Division, the nine (9) single-family homes will have access from a private driveway entering from Bresee Street. Each residential unit will have its own enclosed private open space, ranging between 580 square feet and 2,003 square feet, which will be directly accessible from within each of the homes. This particular design will orientate two of the homes toward Bresee Street, thus, creating a residential presence while keeping the garages out of direct view of Bresee Street. Additional features of the project include: colored stamped concrete within the driveway area, decorative block walls and landscaping within common open space areas. Furthermore, the Applicant is CAArny\AMY\W0RD\Reports\Counci1 Reports\Z-541 and DR-27-3.doc Z -541, DR -27, and TM -61281 February 2, 2005 Page 5 proposing to retain and work around a large, existing oak tree that will be incorporated into the larger common open space area. According to the floor plans and elevations, all residential units will be two -story with floor areas ranging from 1,880 square feet to 2,063 square feet and consist of four (4) bedrooms, three (3) bathrooms and a two -car garage. - Building Height and ,Architectural Design The applicant has proposed to employ different designs and materials that will provide variety and aesthetic interest throughout the project. The exterior elevations of the proposed homes will have a mix of classic Spanish and Craftsman style architectural design. Design elements include a mixture of stucco- finished elevations, siding, faux shutters, and decorative veneers. Roofing material will consist of concrete tile. Although there are only three different floor plans proposed, each of the proposed units has been designed to avoid a "monolithic" appearance. The exterior walls and rooflines are staggered along both the vertical and horizontal planes. The roof and wall variations, along with the subtle changes in colors, help to visually reduce the mass and bulk of the buildings. Varying materials are utilized along the front elevation to emphasize an appealing view from the common areas. The project will involve the construction of six (6) foot high block walls around the perimeter of each unit to enclose the private open space areas. Any walls that are visible from the public right -of -way will be decorative block with a cap. Wall material shall be subject to Planning Division review and approval. Staff and the Design Review Committee are of the opinion that this project meets not only the requirements set forth in the Zoning Code (i.e. on -site parking, setbacks, open space, etc...) but also the purpose and intent of the Planned Development Overlay Ordinance and the City's adopted Design Guidelines for Single- Family Detached Planned Residential Developments. As a prerequisite for the proposed development, a request for approval of a tentative tract map to subdivide two (2) lots into ten (10) lots for residential purposes is required. The Tentative Tract Map illustrates the nine (9) building footprints for the residential units and private rear yards. The tenth lot represents the common areas accessible to all owners within the development such as the guest parking stalls, common driveway, front yard areas and common open space areas. PLANNING I 1 14l At the October 13, 2004 Commission meeting, an adjacent property owner spoke against the project because of easement issues affecting his property located at 3763 Sresee Street. As a result, the Commission directed the Applicant to work with the C:Wmy\AMY\WORD \Reports \Council Reports\Z -541 and DR- 27 -3.doc Z-541, DR-27, and TM-61281 February 2, 2005 Paqe 6 adjacent property owner on a solution to their concerns and continued the public hearing to October 27, 2004. At the October 27, 2004 meeting, the Applicant presented a revised site plan which provides an easement (15' by 29') to the 3763 Bresee Street property owner. Although the easement area was originally designated common open space area for the project, the area still maintains the square footage required by the City's Zoning Code. Furthermore, the private open space areas for the adjacent lots will be increased slightly. As a result of the proposed modification, staff has included conditions of approval that relate directly to the proposed easement, including signage stating 'No Parking' and a revised site plan. The Planning Commission voted to recommend that the City Council approve the Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact, Z-541, DR-27 and TM-061281 with the modification to the site plan to include the proposed easement to the property owner at 3763 Bresee Street. RECOMMENDATION Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council: Introduce Ordinance 1251, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK APPROVING A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM RG, RESIDENTIAL GARDEN TO RG(PD) RESIDENTIAL GARDEN PLANNED DEVELOPMENT; (APPLICANT: BO DEN DEVELOPMENT; CASE NUMBER: Z-541; LOCATION 3773-3779 BRESEE STREET); AND 1. That the site for the proposed development is physically suitable as the topography of the site is essentially flat and will be developed with nine (9) single-family dwelling residences at a density allowed by the City's Zoning Code provided that a Development Plan and Zone Change (adding the Planned Development (PD) Overlay) are approved; and 2. That the design of the subdivision will not be a threat to the Health, Safety and Welfare of the citizens of Baldwin Park as the proposed project is a nine (9) unit single-family detached residential subdivision which is compatible with the surrounding single-family and multi-family residential zoning designations; and CAArny\AMY\W0RD\Reports\Counci1 Reports\Z-541 and DR-27-3.doc Z -541, DR -27, and TM -61281 February 2, 2005 Paae 7 3. That the Tentative Tract Map will be consistent with the City of Baldwin Park's General Plan, provided approval of the Development Plan and Zone Change will allow for the site to be developed with detached single - family residences which is consistent with the project proposal; and 4. That development of the sites in accordance with the Tentative Tract Map will not affect future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities for the area as the natural, flat topography of the site and the future development of nine (9) 2 story dwelling units will not affect said opportunities; and 5. That the proposed Tentative Map is in an area serviced by Valley County Water District. The District has indicated that the proposal will not violate any water quality standards for the Water District. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. That the subject Property shall be developed and maintained in substantial compliance with Exhibit "A ", dated February 2, 2005, except as modified herein by these conditions; and 2. That electric garage door openers shall be provided for each unit; and 3. That sectional roll -up garage doors shall be provided for each unit; and 4. That all landscaped areas must be separated from vehicular areas by a 6" continuous concrete curb; and 5. That a decorative block wall shall be provided surrounding the property. Decorative block walls with brick cap will be required along all exterior property dines that are visible from the public right -of -way and the common driveway, proposed materials are subject to Planning Division approval. Interior property line delineator walls shall be precision block with a brick cap; and 6. Each of the homes shall be provided with decorative motion sensor Lights at each garage and main level entrance door. Exterior lighting shall be decorative and automatically controlled. Manufacturer's literature shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval when plan are submitted to the Building Division for plan check; and 7. Each unit shall be pre -wired for an alarm system; and detailed landscaping plan shall be provided • • the size, location, species of • ground cover, and any other plan life proposed, This plan shall be submitted during plan check phase; and 9. All Landscaping shall be automatically irrigated and a detailed irrigation plan shall be submitted during the plan check phase; and C:\Amy\AMY\WORD \Reports \Council Reports\Z -541 and DR- 27 -3.doc Z -541, DR -27, and TM -61281 February 2, 2005 Page 8 10. That the applicant shall provide a letter from Waste Management agreeing to provide individual refuse pick -up services to each residential unit in lieu of providing a trash enclosure; and 11. That the applicant shall submit a copy of the proposed covenants, conditions and restrictions to the Planning Division prior to obtaining building permits; and 12. That the CC &R's shall reflect that any future addition to individual units shall be limited to a patio cover which shall not exceed 25% of the rear yard area and shall meet all zoning code requirements; and 13. That the CC &R's shall reflect that vehicular parking within identified guest parking stalls shall not exceed seven (7) continuous days within a thirty (30) day period; and 14. That any walls surrounding the proposed easement area shall be decorative and shall match any proposed and /or existing walls. Decorative walls shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Division; and 15. That the Applicant shall work with Planning Division staff to provide a small recreational amenity within the smaller common open space area; and 16. That the Applicant shall work with the Planning Division to provide a decorative entry statement along both sides of the driveway entry area. At a minimum the entry statement shall provide the address range for the units within the project; and 17. That the Applicant shall provide verification from the Engineering Division that the proposed easement for the properties at 3763 -3767 Bresee Avenue will not affect the Tentative Tract Map 61281; and 18. That the Applicant shall provide two (2) revised site plans identifying the proposed easement area; and 19. The Applicant shall provide a complete set of construction drawings, site plans, elevations, floor plans, landscaping plans, irrigation plans, etc. in a digital format to the Building and Planning Divisions. Any changes in the field during the construction phase to the approved set of plans will result in `as- built' plans being submitted in digital format to the Building and Planning Divisions; and 20. That the `guest parking' stalls located adjacent to the open space areas in the rear and the larger open space area shall be treated with grasscrete, which will soften the appearance of concrete and yet allow vehicular parking; and 21. That the Applicant shall stripe the proposed easement area and label the area as CAAmy\AMY\WORD \Reports \Council Reports\Z -541 and DR- 27 -3.doc Z -541, DR -27, and TM- 61281 February 2, 2005 Page 9 `No Parking ". Signs shall also be posted within the easement area which state that the area shall not be utilized for parking purposes; and 22. That all utilities shall be undergrounded. This includes utility connections to each individual unit, as well as along the frontage of the property along Bresee Street; and 23. Provide the following information upon the Plan Check submittal: A. Three (3) architectural plans and one (1) extra site plan for the Fire Department B. Three (3) complete sets of Plans for the City. C. Two sets of the following are required: i. Soil Reports ii. Structural Calculations iii. Title 24 Energy Calculations 24. That the applicant shall comply with all Los Angeles County Fire Department comments; and 25. All conditions of the State Map Subdivision Act and City's Subdivision Ordinance must be met prior to recordation; and 26. All conditions of the Los Angeles County fire Department must be _met prior to recordation. A written notification or approval plan from the Fire Department must be submitted to the City; and 27. All special assessments and utilities or sewer connection fees are to be paid prior to recording the final map; and 28. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including water, gas,. electricity, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the respective utility companies' standards. Easements shall be provided as required; and 29. Prior to recordation of the final map, a written certification from the Water District, GTE, SCE, SCG and Adelphia Cable stating that adequate facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed development shall be submitted to the City. _ Such letter must be issued by the utility company at least 30 days prior approval to final map; and 30. A title report/guarantee showing all fee owners and interest holders must be submitted when a final map is submitted for `plan check. This account must remain open until the final map is filed with the County Recorder. An updated title report/guarantee must be submitted ten (10) working days prior to approval of final map; and C:\Amy\AMY\WORD \Reports \Council Reports\Z -541 and DR- 27 -3.doc Z -541, DR -27, and TM -61281 February 2, 2005 Page 10 31. The final map shall be based on a field survey; and 32. All surveying for the proposed development will be done by the developer, including the establishment of centerline ties; and 33. The surveyor's closure sheets must be enclosed with the final map. 34. New boundary monuments must be set in accordance with the City standards and subject to approval by the City Engineer. 35. All easements existing prior to final map approval must be identified. If an easement is blanket or indeterminate in nature, a statement to that effect must be shown on the final map in lieu of its location. 36. All site grading, landscaping, irrigation, street improvements, sewer and storm drain improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to final map approval. 37. Grading plan (24" x 36 ") must be designed in compliance with recommendations of the final' detailed soils and engineering geology reports. All remedial earthworks shall be incorporated on the City's standard mylar. Plans shall be submitted on the City's standard mylar. 38. Grading plan must be signed and stamped by a registered Civil Engineer. 39. Provide a sewer plan signed by a registered Civil Engineer, designed and drawn to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Must be submitted if an on -site main line facility is proposed. ` Each building must have a separate and independent connection to a main line sewer 40. Submit to this office a Soils Report signed by a Registered Soils Engineer /Registered Civil Engineer. 41. The following off -site improvements must be existing or guaranteed for: a) Parcel must have separate and independent connections to the main sewer separate connection of line. b) Install new 8" sewer line and manhole for the 6" laterals going in each separate unit. c) Install landscaped parkway and irrigational system for the entire frontage of the property (Bresee side). d) Remove and replace sections of broken curb and gutter along the frontage of proposed property. e) Provide streetlights for proposed street per City Master Plan. f) Remove existing driveway approaches not being utilized and replace with full height (8" curb). C:\Amy\AMY\WORD \Reports \Council Reports\Z -541 and DR- 27 -3.doc Z -541, DR -27, and TM -61281 February 2, 2005 Page 11 g) All proposed driveway approaches shall meet the ADA requirements. h) Install water services and gas services for the proposed .development area. i) Grind 1 1/2 AC and overlay 1 1/2 AC from curb to curb along Bresee Avenue. j) Plant two trees along Bresee Avenue per City Standard. k) Install landscaped parkway and irrigation system along Bresee Avenue (frontage of proposed development area). 1) Conduct traffic study and submit to the Engineering Department for review and approval. 42. A complete hydrology study will be required; and 43. The developer shall submit to the City Engineer the total cost estimate for bonding purposes of all off -site improvements prior to approval of the final map; and 44. If the City accepts approval of the final map prior to the completion of all required public improvements', the developer shall enter into a subdivision agreement with the City and shall post the appropriate security; and 45. A copy of the final map reduced to 8 1/2 x 11 " shall be submitted to the Engineering Division prior to meeting with the Zoning Administrator for the subject parcel map; and 46. Approval of this tentative map does not constitute approval of the site plan or building footprints; and 47. The City is being served by a cable TV franchise awarded to Adelphia Cable. All residential units constructed shall be prewired and made ready for cable TV connections; and 48. After the final map records, a mylar and two blue line prints shall be submitted to the Engineering Division at no cost to the City. Final occupancy will not be granted until the recorded map is received by the Engineering Division; and 49. CC & R must be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney prior to map recordation; and 50. Provide maps in digital format to the County of Los Angeles per County requirement; and 51. The final map must be recorded within 24 months or all proceedings shall be terminated; and CAAmy\AMY\WORD \Reports \Council Reports\Z -541 and DR- 27 -3.doc Z -541, DR -27, and TM- 61281 February 2, 2005 Page 12 52. That the applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval within six (6) months after the date of the approval of DR -27 or the entitlements shall become null and void. 53. That the applicant shall sign a notarized affidavit within twenty (20) days of the date of this resolution stating that the applicant has read and accepts all of the conditions of approval. ATTACHMENTS: #1 - Exhibit "A" - Development Plan, dated February 2, 2005 #2 Exhibit "B" - Existing Zoning and Land Use Designations #3 - Exhibit "C - Proposed Zoning and Land Use Designation #4 - Environmental Data — Draft Negative Declaration and Initial Study #5'- Application Form and Statements #6 - Ordinance 1251 #7 - Resolution 2004 -089 REPORT PREPARED BY: Amy L. Harbin, Principal Planner C:\Amy\AMY\WORD \Reports \Council Reports\Z -541 and DR- 27 -3.doc r.� N'dtd�I.[S L16L-EO£ (9Z9) l(� VD NNVcl N[M(FIV i 91016 VD'VIAO -d NOW o oY U�P QA19IIIH.1.00.3 MZIZ TAV TTStlX9 `t8Zt90,L3V'd,l. a r ii��77� L DNI `lN"4MIO"13AW1 NICIMO6 a n i Q f� d IINfl (6) li.?3fONd ;iNV_lillitli NNNMO O Tf1NgAK TTSINO Llsari, —� s ¢I r 6 Gi O —� OLr \ ,aril LL. "' �p o D N Uj c a.m co ry i m U) M C i 0 O p C i C` 1` Uj O cV �. - — °— F- W I co K! r �. -Q'4 �C7 _ co c� Gn 1 9 § �@ 1 — - -I t , a Nouvn3 ?3 a Nouvn313 , \3N - £ Nv l� /GN - Z NY'W Y N0llivA '13 't U) In U) co U) DEG 0a) Oo �C J� cli Cl) E) 0 0- �2 L) -Ujj > i <�z < "r 0 z W < LL CL 0 CO < � 0 ' F- CL Z QQ � U w 9 wo� -j U) EL 0 w W x < wag w z 1! F, > 0 W w 0 W , 101, w (000 < c) L) z It 0 W Z E) 0 0- �2 L) -Ujj > i <�z < "r 0 w U)(D WU) — < LL CL 0 CO < � 0 ' F- CL Z QQ � U w 9 wo� -j U) I L O 16 MO 1W ZOO Z x < 1- Z It z 41� U- F— 0 F, > 0 W w 0 w (000 < c) L) z UJ M W CC W Z M20 00 xw w g (L U- z < a: w D N CO w cn U- < 0 w z w C, T— L-jJJ (D Z mm w:r co C\1 U) < 6z :D 0 (A 0 0 -J IS Zfi �-o C) 0� x< 0, � 3nN3AV 33S3�19 zo < LZL, I-- uj z 2 2 z 0� LL CC :3 D- ou-0 o bi E) 0 0- �2 L) -Ujj > i <�z < "r 0 w U)(D WU) — < LL CL 0 CO < � 0 ' F- CL Z Z uj § �- (0 UJ o wo� -j U) I L O 16 MO 1W ZOO Z >9 O-L) z Lmj, U- F— 0 F, > 0 W mom- :3 w (000 < c) L) z UJ M W CC W Z CL �- cu- < LL M20 w 0 LU to O D S Z LU 0 09t m .99.60.ot N w D z LL1 W LLJ x m C, Cl) uj O O W t- U) CO w z O W (j) 0 CL 0 •�_ LY6LE0£ f9Z9) 91016 YJ `YfAOUMvq 1i' UTIRLLOOV&rTz D%Rriataa Naahloa s z � ®d E^� w w t Q a ® ®❑ y w 000® w EEI 0 000 w w 0000 000® w o ®®® ,,c �►. a r. acs►, `ie '' . t: �� ... • t1 • S t r<-t a W W t 3 t ■ • 1lra� mug 4s` �i ` 'dtiuiQZ�'H v� 9ItlY6 L164-�D (M) gg iili'��SM IM901. M 'QA't$TY>�p3� L g 19 E f Z PIV'Id '� `�Q taau�ri � W' O W W W W H ® ®® EM t W' O W W W W H fl .4 a a ' • 11111 r � !�-�'' . ;� � �- » . { w • .t d IT, W F W W FY 3IU8 01 3702 37 S'C 5 ��,tE� 75 74 2 730 37 73 74 t 1725 7 1372 137 13745 FExhibit 7 3718 N_ 3848 CD Q .n ..r T�' 3843 3679 3 C:\AmyWMY\WORD \Reports \Council Reports\Z -541 and DR- 27 -2.doc \I -- lla4 tt CITY OF BAL:DWIN PARK BAL I N NEGATIVE DECLARATION P> A, R— K DATE: September 2, 2004 APPLICANT: Todd Bowden, representing Bowden Development TYPE OF Zone Change, Development Plan and Tentative Tract Map PERMIT: FILE NO.: Z -541, DR -27 and TM -61281 LOCATION OF PROJECT: 3773 -3779 Bresee Street, Baldwin Park DESRIPTION OF PROJECT: Request for approval of a zone change from R-G to R- G(PD), a development plan and a tentative tract map to subdivide two lots into twelve lots. The Applicant is proposing the construction of eleven single- family detached dwelling units and a common lot: It is the opinion of the ❑ Zoning Administrator ❑ Planning Commission ® City. Council ® Other that, upon review of the project, it has determined that the project will not have a significant effect upon the environment. Mitigation Measures ® are attached are not required (Signature) Principal Planner (Title) Date(s) of Public Notice: September 22, 2004 ® Legal advertisement ❑ Posting of the properties ® Written notice (msw\forms\negdec) 1/97 INITIAL STUDY, ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION 1. Project Title: Z -541 DR -27 TM- 6128.1 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Baldwin Park 14403 E. Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, CA 91706 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Amy L. Harbin, Principal Planner (626) 813 -5261 4. Project Location: 3773 -3779 Breese Avenue 5. Assessor's Parcel Numbers) 8553- 003 -020 8553- 003 -033 6. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Bowden Development Attention: Todd Bowden 212 West Foothill Blvd. Arcadia, CA 91016 7. General Plan Designation: Multi- Family Residential 8. Zoning: R -G (current) R -G (PD) (proposed) 9. Surrounding Land Uses Incorporated in 1956, the City of Baldwin Park is located and Settings: approximately 17 miles east of downtown Los Angeles. The intersection of the 1 -10 (San Bernardino) and 1 -605 (San Gabriel River) freeways lies near the southwest corner of this 6.8 square mile City. Although Baldwin Park is predominantly a residential bedroom community, recent efforts have placed a greater emphasis on promoting commercial and industrial land uses. However, the City is near "build- out ", focusing efforts on the redevelopment of land, especially within close proximity to the freeway. %ccording to the 2000 Census, Baldwin Park has approximately 75,900 persons. This is more than double the population in 1960. Baldwin Park is predominantly a Hispanic working class community, although between the 1990 and 2000 Census has experienced an increase in its Asian population. Furthermore, the City has a considerably larger than average household size than the County average, suggesting increased pressure on the City's housing stock and the provision of services. uity of Baldwin �l . -� i � Z-541 and DR-27 ----September 22, 2004 4 10_ Description nf Project: ' Introduction, Purpose and Need for the Project: ' Recently, the Planning Division has received 8O application for eZone Change, Development Plan, and Tentative Tract Map to develop an eleven M1\ unit single-family detached residential development and common lot. |O order for the planned unit development bJbe constructed, 8zone change i8 required tOredesignate the property from F7-G Residential Garden Planned Development to R-G(PO) Multi-Family Residential Planed Development an well as a development plan and tentative tract `map. The project vviUprov)dequaUty.noorkutnatodvvaUingunitSvvithinthe{|itv. ' Project Characteristics: ' The following entitlements are required for the project: 1) & Zone Change from R-G, Multi-Family Residential toR-SUzO\.Multi-Family ` Residential Planned Unit Development, pursuant to Sections 153.631 and 153.W38of the City's Zoning Code; and 2\ A Development Plan to 3Unw the construction of an eleven (11) unit single ' family detached planned development and cnrnnnon lot, pursuant to Section 153.271of the City's Zoning Code; and 3) A Tentative Tract Map to subdivide two /2> lots into twelve (12) lots for residential purposes, pursuant to Section 152.07 of the City's Municipal Code. _ 11. Other public agencies whose approval hs required ke.o', permits, financing approval, or participation agreement) ` ' Other than thm.Ca|ifomio Department of Real Estate, which needs to approve the Covenants, ' Conditions and Restrictions (CC&F<'V) for the project, no additional public approvals beyond Planning Commission and City Council are required for this project. ' 12' References The following are also referenced where appropriate in the Environmental Checklist Form: @' General Plan b. Municipal Code C. Zoning Code ' d. Emergency Operations Coordinator e. Geological Map—Liquefaction Zones 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers, except "No Impact" answccz ��ot are adequately by information sources � k��d agency c��m ����� ��nazd�e�eS � ` following each question. /\ ^N0 Impact" answer is adequately auppor".&J A u r��renced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should ' be explained where it is based on project-specific factor as weU as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to poUutanto, based on a project—specific, screening analysis.) � ' ' �md��oowue"n-mm*/oR-27.doo.`� � Z -541 and DR -27 September 22, 2004 Page 5 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including offsite as well as onsite, cumulative as well as project - level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant impact' to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross - referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiring, program EIR, or other GEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used.. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures, which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's, environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. CAAmyV,MY\WORD\cEQA \tnitial Studies\13OwdewZ- 5414 DR- 27,doc Z -541 and DR -27 Page 6 - - -- — ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: Explanation of Checklist Judgements: I(a). * No Impact. The City is essentially flat and devoid of any scenic vistas or views. Therefore, the project will not have an adverse affect on a scenic vista or result in the obstruction of any scenic views. I (b). No Impact. This project will not result in the damage or destruction of scenic resources or historical buildings as the property is void of any structures and scenic resources. [(c). No Impact. This project will not substantially degrade the existing visual character and quality of the City of Baldwin Park. Through the Design Review process, the project has been designed so as to ensure no aesthetic offensive site, building or mechanical equipment will be open to public view. Furthermore, the project has been deemed by the City's Design Review Committee compatible with the surrounding adjacent properties and consistent with the Design Guidelines developed by the City. I(d). No Impact. This project will not create any new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the residential zones. New light from the project will be emitted from exterior elevation lighting which is meant to be decorative and /or provide security. Less Than Less Than Potentially Significant Potentially Significant Less Than Significant I AESTHETICS Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Impact Mitigation Impact In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are Incorporation Would the project: ® ® " a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an within a state scenic highway? optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and X C) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or farmland. Would the project: quality of the site and its surroundings? a) Convert Prime Farmland, unique Farmland, or Farmland of d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- Explanation of Checklist Judgements: I(a). * No Impact. The City is essentially flat and devoid of any scenic vistas or views. Therefore, the project will not have an adverse affect on a scenic vista or result in the obstruction of any scenic views. I (b). No Impact. This project will not result in the damage or destruction of scenic resources or historical buildings as the property is void of any structures and scenic resources. [(c). No Impact. This project will not substantially degrade the existing visual character and quality of the City of Baldwin Park. Through the Design Review process, the project has been designed so as to ensure no aesthetic offensive site, building or mechanical equipment will be open to public view. Furthermore, the project has been deemed by the City's Design Review Committee compatible with the surrounding adjacent properties and consistent with the Design Guidelines developed by the City. I(d). No Impact. This project will not create any new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the residential zones. New light from the project will be emitted from exterior elevation lighting which is meant to be decorative and /or provide security. C>\Amy\AMY\WORD \CEQA\Initial Studies \Bowden Z =54-1 , & =DR- 27.doc •` Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than II AGRICULTURE RESOURCES Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact {nco oration In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the Califomia Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? ® ® " b) Conflict with existing. zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? J` C>\Amy\AMY\WORD \CEQA\Initial Studies \Bowden Z =54-1 , & =DR- 27.doc •` Z -541 and DR -27 - September 22, 2004 Page 7 Explanation of Checklist Judgements: II(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not convert any type of farmland to a non- agricultural use. ' II(b). No Impact. The proposed project will not conflict with the existing residential zoning designation, agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract. II(c). No Impact. The project will not result in the conversion of farmland to non - agricultural uses. III AIR QUALITY Potentially Significant Less Than Less Than Significant No Impact Potentially Significant Less Than lI AGRICULTURE RESOURCES Significant With Significant No Impact applicable air quality management or air pollution control district Impact Mitigation Impact may be relief upon to make the following determinations. 'Would the incorporation C) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air Explanation of Checklist Judgements: II(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not convert any type of farmland to a non- agricultural use. ' II(b). No Impact. The proposed project will not conflict with the existing residential zoning designation, agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract. II(c). No Impact. The project will not result in the conversion of farmland to non - agricultural uses. III AIR QUALITY Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Less Than Significant No Impact Im act p Mitigation Incorporation Impact p Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relief upon to make the following determinations. 'Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? ❑ ❑ b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? C) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air : quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? ® `! d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? J� e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: IIl(a). No Impact. The proposed project does not conflict with any applicable air quality plan. The City of Baldwin Park is located within the South Coast Air Basin; which is a non - attainment area for selective pollutants. Air pollution is a regional problem. Pollution levels in Baldwin Park are a result of not only local emissions, but also of those throughout the region. 111(h). Nct Impact. The project will not result in a net increase of which the region is in non - attainment. III(c). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the region is in non- attainment. The Southern California Association of Governments and the South Coast Air Quality Management District have adopted a South Coast Air Quality Management Plan (SCAQMP). The proposed project is consistent with that plan and will not have a significant .impact upon; air quality. However, there will be temporary increases in air ?,: C:1Amy! °AMY\ WORD \CEQA\Initial Studies \Bowden Z- 54'1 &:DR27.doc Z -541 and DR -27 September 22; 2004 -- - - -- —= - - - - - -- Page 8 — - - -- pollutant emissions during the construction phase.. Construction dust and air pollution, however, will be reduced with the following procedures. Procedures to reduce air pollution include the following: 1) That the applicant adheres to the SCAQMD Rule 403 insuring the clean up construction related dirt on approach routes to the site. 2) The watering techniques shall be employed to partially mitigate the impact of construction generated dust particles. 3) Maintenance and servicing of construction equipment to minimize exhaust emissions. 4) Halting of construction activities during Stage 1 and Stage 2 smog alerts. III(d). No Impact. The proposed project will not expose any nearby sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. 111(e). No Impact. The proposed project will not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: IV(a). No Impact. The project will not have any effect on any species identified by the California Department of Fish and Game or the US Fish and Wildlife Service. IV(b.). -No: Impact-:The project will not have a.su.bstantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat ., GaAmyFAMI 'tWORD10EQA \Inttial'Studies \Bowden Z- 54.1 =& DR- 27.doe - � Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than IV BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES significant With significant No impact - Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. C) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or Impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f} Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation Ian? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: IV(a). No Impact. The project will not have any effect on any species identified by the California Department of Fish and Game or the US Fish and Wildlife Service. IV(b.). -No: Impact-:The project will not have a.su.bstantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat ., GaAmyFAMI 'tWORD10EQA \Inttial'Studies \Bowden Z- 54.1 =& DR- 27.doe - � Z -541 and DR -27 September 22, 2004 _. - -- Page 9 - -- - -- -- or other sensitive natural community identified in any local or regional plans, policies regulations or by the California Department of Fish and game or by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as there are no riparian habitats or otherwise located within Baldwin Park. IV(c). No Impact. The project will not have a substantial effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. There are no federally protected wetlands within the City of Baldwin Park. IV(d). No impact. The project will not interfere with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites as the City of Baldwin Park is within an urbanized area and not within five (5) miles of a wildlife corridor. IV(e). No Impact. The proposed project does not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, as the City of Baldwin Park does not have any ordinances protecting trees, wildlife, etc. IV(f). No Impact. The project proposal will not conflict with any provisions of an adopted habitat conservation plan, natural community conservation plan or any local, regional or state habitat conservation plan, as the City's General plan does not indicate any of the referenced plans which could be affected by the project proposal. Explanation of Checklist Judgements; V(a). No Impact. The project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. V(b). No Impact. The project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource. V(c). No Impact. The project will not destroy a unique paleontological resource or geological feature. V(d). No impact. The project is not expected to disturb any human remains. The City of Baldwin Park does not have any cemeteries nor have any Indian burial sites been identified within the City. C;1Amy1AMY\WORD\CEQA \Initial Studies \Bowden Z-541:& DR- 27.doc Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than V CULTURAL RESOURCES Significant with Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation impact Inco oration Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? X C) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geological feature? X `/ d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred formal outside of cemeteries? Explanation of Checklist Judgements; V(a). No Impact. The project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. V(b). No Impact. The project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource. V(c). No Impact. The project will not destroy a unique paleontological resource or geological feature. V(d). No impact. The project is not expected to disturb any human remains. The City of Baldwin Park does not have any cemeteries nor have any Indian burial sites been identified within the City. C;1Amy1AMY\WORD\CEQA \Initial Studies \Bowden Z-541:& DR- 27.doc Z -541 and DR -27 September 22, 2004 Page 10 Explanation of Checklist Judgements: VI (a). No Impact. The proposed project will not expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects involving the rupture of a known earthquake fault. According to the City's General plan, there are no active faults within the City of Baldwin Park; therefore no Alquist - Priolo Special Study Zones are within the City. Although there are no active faults within the City of Baldwin Park, there are several major faults surrounding the City, which have the potential for causing major damage; however, the occurrence of direct ground rupture is not likely according to the City's General Plan. Potential for this type of activity is similar throughout Southern California and no unique or unusual risk is posed by the proposed project. According to the Seismic Hazard Zones Map dated 3/99 from the State Department of Geology and Mines, the future development of these lots as a planned unit development is not within the noted liquefaction zone, however it is on the edge of the noted boundary. Appropriate measures will be taken to ensure that grading and - onstruction standards are met for the proposed project. VI(b). No Impact. The City is located in a relatively flat urbanized area with a very low potential for wind and water erosion of soils. VI(c). No Impact. Although the location of this project is on the edge of the Liquefaction zone boundary, but not within the zone, measures will be taken to ensure that grading and construction. standards are met for the proposed project. C \Arny\AMY\WORD \CEQA\Initial Studies \Bowden Z- 54'1'& DR- 27.doe Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than VI GEOLOGY AND SOILS Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Inca oration Would the project. a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist -Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ® ® ® `i ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic- related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv)Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? C) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and ® ® f�l 1:1 v X potentially result in on or offsite landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 -1 -B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risk to life or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: VI (a). No Impact. The proposed project will not expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects involving the rupture of a known earthquake fault. According to the City's General plan, there are no active faults within the City of Baldwin Park; therefore no Alquist - Priolo Special Study Zones are within the City. Although there are no active faults within the City of Baldwin Park, there are several major faults surrounding the City, which have the potential for causing major damage; however, the occurrence of direct ground rupture is not likely according to the City's General Plan. Potential for this type of activity is similar throughout Southern California and no unique or unusual risk is posed by the proposed project. According to the Seismic Hazard Zones Map dated 3/99 from the State Department of Geology and Mines, the future development of these lots as a planned unit development is not within the noted liquefaction zone, however it is on the edge of the noted boundary. Appropriate measures will be taken to ensure that grading and - onstruction standards are met for the proposed project. VI(b). No Impact. The City is located in a relatively flat urbanized area with a very low potential for wind and water erosion of soils. VI(c). No Impact. Although the location of this project is on the edge of the Liquefaction zone boundary, but not within the zone, measures will be taken to ensure that grading and construction. standards are met for the proposed project. C \Arny\AMY\WORD \CEQA\Initial Studies \Bowden Z- 54'1'& DR- 27.doe Z -541 and DR -27 September 22,_ 2004 - -- Page 11 — - -- VI (d). No Impact. The City and the project area are located on a very low to low expansive soil as defined in Table 18 -1 -B of the UBC (1997). Therefore the project will not create any risk to life or property. VI(e). No Impact. The proposed project's location does have sewers available for the disposal of wastewater and each dwelling unit will have a lateral connected to the main sewer line for the disposal of waste. Furthermore, the soils at the proposed location can adequately support the. use of the sewers. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: VII (a). No Impact. The project will not create a significant hazard to the public through the routine transport use or disposal of hazardous materials. It is not anticipated that there will be any hazardous materials associated with the proposed project. VII(b). No Impact. There will be no significant hazard to the public or the environment regarding the upset or release of hazardous materials into the envi.1- 01i7m.nt. VII(c). No Impact. The single - family residential project will not emit emissions or handle hazardous material, substances or waste within one - quarter of an existing school. VII(d). No impact. The proposed project is not located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous materials sites. Vll(e). No Impact: The project is not located within an airport land use plan or within two CAAmytAMY\ WORD \CEQA \Initial Studies \Bowden Z =541 & DR- 27.doc Less Than VII HAZARDS AND Potentially Significant Less Than HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Significant Significant rJolmpact - lImpact Mitigation Inco oration Would the project: ®_ a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident ® ® ® �/ X conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment) c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one - X quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code �/ X Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project ® ® 1:1 �/ X result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project areal g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency ® X evacuation Ian? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where X wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where L_ residences are intermixed with wildlands? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: VII (a). No Impact. The project will not create a significant hazard to the public through the routine transport use or disposal of hazardous materials. It is not anticipated that there will be any hazardous materials associated with the proposed project. VII(b). No Impact. There will be no significant hazard to the public or the environment regarding the upset or release of hazardous materials into the envi.1- 01i7m.nt. VII(c). No Impact. The single - family residential project will not emit emissions or handle hazardous material, substances or waste within one - quarter of an existing school. VII(d). No impact. The proposed project is not located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous materials sites. Vll(e). No Impact: The project is not located within an airport land use plan or within two CAAmytAMY\ WORD \CEQA \Initial Studies \Bowden Z =541 & DR- 27.doc Z -541 and DR -27 September 22, 2004 Page 42 _ - - - -- - miles of a public airport, and therefore would not create a hazard to people residing or working in the area. VII(f). No Impact. Since the project is not within the vicinity of a private airstrip, the project would not create a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project. area. VII(g). No Impact. According to the City's Emergency Operations Coordinator, the project proposal will not impair implementation or physically interfere with the City's adopted emergency plan or emergency evacuation plan. VIL(h). No Impact. The project proposal is within a highly urbanized area and will therefor not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: VILI(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements, as the facility will generate minimal amounts of solid waste typical. for this particular residential use. In addition, the applicant will be required to .implement and comply, with the requirements of the National Pollution Elimination Discharge System, (NPDES), which regulates water quality runoff: CAArny.1AMY\WORD \CEQA \Initial Studles \Bowden -Z -541 & DR- 27.doc Less Than VIII HYDROLOGY AND WATER Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact QUALITY Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: ❑ ® ® \� X a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b} Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of ® ❑ ® pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would /�. not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? C) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or 'river, in a manner which would 'result in ® ® ®` substantial erosion or siltation on or offsite? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount ' x of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on or offsite? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage ® ❑ ❑ �/ X systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. ® ® ® X f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? _ j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or, v Explanation of Checklist Judgements: VILI(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements, as the facility will generate minimal amounts of solid waste typical. for this particular residential use. In addition, the applicant will be required to .implement and comply, with the requirements of the National Pollution Elimination Discharge System, (NPDES), which regulates water quality runoff: CAArny.1AMY\WORD \CEQA \Initial Studles \Bowden -Z -541 & DR- 27.doc Z -541 and DR -27 September 22, 2004 Pape 13 VIII(b). No Impact. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies or interfere With groundwater recharge. - VIII(c). No Impact. The proposed project will not substantially alter the course of an adjacent stream or river, which would result in erosion, or siltation of the site as there is no stream or river running through the City, which the exception of the channelized San Gabriel River. Two washes traverse the City (the Big Dalton Wash and Walnut Creek Wash), and the project is not located within '/ mile of either wash. VIII(d). No Impact. The proposed project will not substantially alter the drainage patterns of the City and will not alter the course of a stream or river, as there are no streams or. rivers in the City with the exception of the channelized San Gabriel River. VIII(e). No Impact. The proposed project will not create or contribute run -off, which would exceed the capacity of the existing storm drain system. Nor will the proposed project. provide any polluted run -off. VIII(f). No Impact. The project will not degrade the existing water quality because of the limited amount of impervious surfaces associated with the project. VIII(g). No Impact. The project proposal will not place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area. Furthermore, the City is not within a Flood Zone. Federal Emergency Management Association (FEMA) has the City of Baldwin Park classified as Zone C- 060100. Vill(h). No Impact. The proposal is not within a 100 -year flood hazard area. FEMA has classified the City of Baldwin Park as Zone C- 060100. VIII(i). No Impact. The project proposal will not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss involving flooding as a direct result of the failure of a levee or dam. Although the Santa Fe dam is located directly adjacent to the City across Arrow Highway, large- scale flooding as a result of failure of this particular dam is negligible due to the design of the dam in that water is present in the dam only a few months of the year. Vlli(j). No Impact. Since Baldwin Park is an inland City, it could not experience a tsunami and the few bodies of water in Baldwin Park are small enough that they would not be able to produce a seiche large enough to cause any damage. Furthermore, Baldwin Park is an urbanized City with no hillsides to speak of and therefore, damage caused by mudflow would be negligible. ar. >Than t Less Than IX LAND USE AND PLANNING significant No Impact impact Mitigation Impact Incorpo ration Would the protect: divide an established community? C:\AmyiAMY\WORD \CEQA \Initial Studies\Bowden Z -541 & DR- 27.doc El El El X Z -541 and DR -27 September 22_2Q04 - -- -- - - -. Page 14 Explanation of Checklist Judgements: IX(a). No Inipact. The proposed Zone Change will not physically divide an established community nor will the proposed development increase the allowable density allowed within the existing zoning designation. IX(b). No Impact. The proposed project is not in conflict with any land use plan, policy or regulation of an agency that has jurisdiction over the project. Thus, not creating any conflict with the land use map (proposed to be amended) once the City initiated `request is approved. IX(c). No Impact. Currently the City has no habitat conservation plans or natural community conservation plans which would possible be affected by the proposed. project. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than IX LAND USE AND PLANNING significant With Significant No Impact Impact, Mitigation Impact Incorporation b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or El 11 El X regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, of the State? local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general I? Ian, s ecific Ian, or other land use an purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? El \� X C) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: IX(a). No Inipact. The proposed Zone Change will not physically divide an established community nor will the proposed development increase the allowable density allowed within the existing zoning designation. IX(b). No Impact. The proposed project is not in conflict with any land use plan, policy or regulation of an agency that has jurisdiction over the project. Thus, not creating any conflict with the land use map (proposed to be amended) once the City initiated `request is approved. IX(c). No Impact. Currently the City has no habitat conservation plans or natural community conservation plans which would possible be affected by the proposed. project. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: X(a). No Impact. The project will not result in the loss of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region or the residents of the State. There are no known mineral resources located within the City of Baldwin Park according to the City's General Plan; X(b). No Impart. The project will not result in the loss of a locally important mineral h. :VE' 4 r site, as the City's General Plan does not indicate any known G tAM AWORDICEQA1lnitial Studies \Bowden Z_541:& DR -27 doc Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than X (MINERAL. RESOURCES Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: El 11 El X a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the. region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general I? Ian, s ecific Ian, or other land use an Explanation of Checklist Judgements: X(a). No Impact. The project will not result in the loss of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region or the residents of the State. There are no known mineral resources located within the City of Baldwin Park according to the City's General Plan; X(b). No Impart. The project will not result in the loss of a locally important mineral h. :VE' 4 r site, as the City's General Plan does not indicate any known G tAM AWORDICEQA1lnitial Studies \Bowden Z_541:& DR -27 doc Z -541 and DR -27 September 22, 2004 Page 15 - - -_ ---- - - - - -- - - Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XI(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not result in the exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the City's General Plan, noise ordinance or applicable standards of other agencies. Noise levels would increase temporarily during the construction phase of the project. Construction is regulated by the City and is addressed in the Municipal Code to limit., overall noise levels to an acceptable range. The City's Code limits construction to between the hours of 7:OOa.m. and 7:0Op.m. Increased population and development- will result in increasing noise from a variety of sources commonly found in an urban environment (human activities, mechanical equipment, automobiles, pets, etc.). XI(b). No Impact. The project will not result in the exposure of persons to generation of; excess ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels. XI(c). No Impact. The project will not result in a substantial permanent increase of ambient noise levels. XI(d). No Impact. The project will not result in a substantial or periodic increase in ambient noise levels above levels that exist. XI (e). No Impact. The City of Baldwin Park is not located within an airport land use plan not within two miles of an airport. Therefore, the amendment will not exposee! to excessive noise levels. XI(f). No Impact. The City of Baldwin Park is not within the_ vicinity of a private airstrip. Therefore, the amendment will not expose people to excessive noise levels. CVWsny1AMY\ WORD \GEQA \Initial Studies \Bowden Z -541: & DR- 27.doc: "' Less Than XI NOISE Potentially Significant Significant With Less Than Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Inco oration Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or ® ® X noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? ® ® ® !, X b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? C) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? x d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? .e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XI(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not result in the exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the City's General Plan, noise ordinance or applicable standards of other agencies. Noise levels would increase temporarily during the construction phase of the project. Construction is regulated by the City and is addressed in the Municipal Code to limit., overall noise levels to an acceptable range. The City's Code limits construction to between the hours of 7:OOa.m. and 7:0Op.m. Increased population and development- will result in increasing noise from a variety of sources commonly found in an urban environment (human activities, mechanical equipment, automobiles, pets, etc.). XI(b). No Impact. The project will not result in the exposure of persons to generation of; excess ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels. XI(c). No Impact. The project will not result in a substantial permanent increase of ambient noise levels. XI(d). No Impact. The project will not result in a substantial or periodic increase in ambient noise levels above levels that exist. XI (e). No Impact. The City of Baldwin Park is not located within an airport land use plan not within two miles of an airport. Therefore, the amendment will not exposee! to excessive noise levels. XI(f). No Impact. The City of Baldwin Park is not within the_ vicinity of a private airstrip. Therefore, the amendment will not expose people to excessive noise levels. CVWsny1AMY\ WORD \GEQA \Initial Studies \Bowden Z -541: & DR- 27.doc: "' Z -541 and DR -27 _September 22, 2004 Page 16 Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XII(a). Less Than Significant Impact. There are currently four (4) existing dwelling units on the subject properties. The net increase of seven (7) residential units will increase the population of the area, which will result in higher levels of traffic and limited, but increased demands on municipal agencies, The increase in population will not create a significant impact. According to the Population and Housing Estimates for Individual Counties from the Department of Finance (dated 11112004), a slight. increase would be expected to occur with an average of 4.6 persons per dwelling,, which creates an approximate increase of thirty -two (32) persons in the area. XII(b). No Impact. The four (4) exiting dwelling units Located on the properties will be demolished to allow for the development of an eleven unit planned unit development. Since the project is not within a redevelopment project area, it is not necessary to provide replacement housing. XII(c). No Impact. Although the proposed project will displace four (4) households, displacement of the households will be conducted in accordance with the various State and Local laws. The project proposal is in accordance with the City's General Plan and the regulations established within the Zoning Code. Less Than Less Than Potentially Significant Potentially Significant Less Than Significant X11 POPULATION AND HOUSING significant With Significant No Impact Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts Incorporation Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and ® ® V X businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable roads or other infrastructure)? service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing any of the public services? elsewhere? ® ® ® X C) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the housing construction of replacement elsewhere? El ® ® El " C) Schools? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XII(a). Less Than Significant Impact. There are currently four (4) existing dwelling units on the subject properties. The net increase of seven (7) residential units will increase the population of the area, which will result in higher levels of traffic and limited, but increased demands on municipal agencies, The increase in population will not create a significant impact. According to the Population and Housing Estimates for Individual Counties from the Department of Finance (dated 11112004), a slight. increase would be expected to occur with an average of 4.6 persons per dwelling,, which creates an approximate increase of thirty -two (32) persons in the area. XII(b). No Impact. The four (4) exiting dwelling units Located on the properties will be demolished to allow for the development of an eleven unit planned unit development. Since the project is not within a redevelopment project area, it is not necessary to provide replacement housing. XII(c). No Impact. Although the proposed project will displace four (4) households, displacement of the households will be conducted in accordance with the various State and Local laws. The project proposal is in accordance with the City's General Plan and the regulations established within the Zoning Code. C:\ Amy\ AMY\ WORD \GEQq \Initial Studies \Bowden Z -543 & DR 27.doc• Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than XIII PUBLIC SERVICES Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services? El El El El X X a) Fire protection? b) Police protection? El El ® ® El " C) Schools? d) Parks? e) Other public facilities? C:\ Amy\ AMY\ WORD \GEQq \Initial Studies \Bowden Z -543 & DR 27.doc• Z-541 and DR-27 -September 22, 2004 Paae 1 Explanation of Checklist Judgements: X111(a). No Impact. The proposed project should not result in the additional need for new or altered fire protection and will not alter acceptable service ratios or response times. Currently the City is served by Station 29, which is located at Los Angeles Street and Maine Avenue. XIII(b).No Impact. Public services are already in place to serve this development. Although the project may result in some increase in police calls, it is anticipated that there will be no impact upon Police Services. X1 I I(c). Less Than Significant Impact. The net impact of the project on the school facilities will be minimal. There would be a slight increase in local school enrollment. if viewed as an isolated occurrence, the project would result in an estimated increase_ in population of up to thirty-two persons (7 units (net increase) x 4.6 persons per unit) with up to ten (10) school-aged children (30% of the total between the ages of 5-19). School impact fees collected prior to occupancy are intended.to off_ set any potential demand for new school facilities. School Development fees in the amount of $2.141s.f. shall be paid to the Baldwin Park Unified School District prior to obtaining building permits. These fees are considered to provide full and complete school facilities. XIII(d).Less Than Significant Impact. Although residential development for this proposed . project will increase the population, the project is not expected to significantly impact the City's existing parks or recreational facilities as more than adequate private yard areas will be required as part of the development. Furthermore, the City's Development Tax ($1,000 per unit for a total of $11,000) collected prior to occupancy is intended to offset any potential demand for recreational facilities. XIII(e).No Impact. The proposed project will not require the need for new or physically altered public facilities. ,7.1 Checklist Judgements: XIV(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project is not expected to significantly impact the City's existing parks or recreational facilities. The City has a very low parks to people ratio, however, private open space areas are required and provided with each dwelling unit. Furthermore, a common open space area is provided which will have amenities such as a shade structure and BBQ area. :GftAMY�AMY\WORD\CEQA\Initia1 Studies\BoWden Z-54.1 & DR- 27.doc; Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than XIV RECREATION Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational X facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would or-cur or be accelerated? b) Does the project Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which X "' ht have an adverse physical effect on the environment? ,7.1 Checklist Judgements: XIV(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project is not expected to significantly impact the City's existing parks or recreational facilities. The City has a very low parks to people ratio, however, private open space areas are required and provided with each dwelling unit. Furthermore, a common open space area is provided which will have amenities such as a shade structure and BBQ area. :GftAMY�AMY\WORD\CEQA\Initia1 Studies\BoWden Z-54.1 & DR- 27.doc; Z -541 and DR -27 .September 22, 2004. XIV(b).No Impact. The proposed project does not require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. i Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XV(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will result in an estimated increase in traffic generated by the net, gain of seven (7) residential units, which will, be less than a significant impact. According to the Trip Generation Handbook by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (5th ed.) each dwelling unit will generate:. approximately nine (9) trip ends per dwelling unit on a weekday and an average of. about 9.5 trip ends on Saturday and Sunday. XV(b). No Impact. The proposal will not exceed a level of service standard established by the County Congestion Management Agency for designated roads or highways. XV(c). No Impact. The proposal will not result in a change or increase in air traffic patterns or levels that result in substantial safety risks. XV(d). No Impact. The proposal will not increase hazards due to a design feature or incompatible uses. As part of the project, the Applicant is required to dedicate thirty feet to widen Dart Street the City's Standards. XV(e). No Impact. The project will not result in inadequate emergency access as the Los Angeles County Fire Department is required to review and approve the project. XV(f). No Impact. The proposed project will not have an impact on existing parking facilities or create a need for new parking as the site meets the required parking standards contained within the Municipal Code. Private parking areas contained within the required.:two.car garages: Furthermore, a total of fourteen (14) guest- ;i. C:1ArnylAMY\WORD \CEQA\IniBal Studies\Bbwden Z -541 & DR- 27.doc Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than XV TRANS PORTATIONITRAFFIC significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? El 1:1 / b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion mana ement agency for designated roads or highways? El ® ❑ X C) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including' either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? El El X d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses e.., farm equipment)? n E ®J El Q ® El ® 1:1 El /� X X e) Result in inadequate emergency access? f} Result in inadequate parking capacity? g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? i Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XV(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will result in an estimated increase in traffic generated by the net, gain of seven (7) residential units, which will, be less than a significant impact. According to the Trip Generation Handbook by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (5th ed.) each dwelling unit will generate:. approximately nine (9) trip ends per dwelling unit on a weekday and an average of. about 9.5 trip ends on Saturday and Sunday. XV(b). No Impact. The proposal will not exceed a level of service standard established by the County Congestion Management Agency for designated roads or highways. XV(c). No Impact. The proposal will not result in a change or increase in air traffic patterns or levels that result in substantial safety risks. XV(d). No Impact. The proposal will not increase hazards due to a design feature or incompatible uses. As part of the project, the Applicant is required to dedicate thirty feet to widen Dart Street the City's Standards. XV(e). No Impact. The project will not result in inadequate emergency access as the Los Angeles County Fire Department is required to review and approve the project. XV(f). No Impact. The proposed project will not have an impact on existing parking facilities or create a need for new parking as the site meets the required parking standards contained within the Municipal Code. Private parking areas contained within the required.:two.car garages: Furthermore, a total of fourteen (14) guest- ;i. C:1ArnylAMY\WORD \CEQA\IniBal Studies\Bbwden Z -541 & DR- 27.doc Z -541 and DR -27 - September 22, 2004 -- - - - - - - -- Paae 19 parking stalls are provided throughout the project, which meets the requirements of the Zoning Code. XV(g). No Impact. The proposed project will not conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XVI(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. XVI(b).No Impact. The proposed project will not require the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or th& expansion of existing facilities. XVI(c).No Impact. The project site is not within a flood zone area. The increase in impervious surfaces primarily due to the proposed street will marginally increase runoff from the project area. The project will be required to provide satisfactory drainage to available storm drains. XVI(d).No Impact. The project will not affect existing water supplies provided to the City. XVI(e).No Impact. The proposed amendment does not involve a project that will result in a determination by the watershed treatment provider that it has adequate capacity to serve a demand. XVI(f). Less Than Significant Impact. A net gain of seven (7) residential units will increase the demand for solid waste disposal; however, the level of solid waste generation is small in comparison to total solid waste disposal on a regional level. The City in an effort to reduce the. amount of solid waste disposed, currently provides recycling containers to residents: for the recycling of paper, glass, plastic and aluminum. G;\ Amy\ AMY\ WORD \CEQA\Initial Studies \Bowden Z 541.& DR- 27.doc a Less Than XVI UTILITIES AND SERVICE Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact SYSTEMS Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b)` Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing ® ® ® X facilities, the construction of which could cause significant /\ environmental effects? C) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental %! effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has ® ® X adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? ® \a f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? ® ® El \` J� g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XVI(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. XVI(b).No Impact. The proposed project will not require the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or th& expansion of existing facilities. XVI(c).No Impact. The project site is not within a flood zone area. The increase in impervious surfaces primarily due to the proposed street will marginally increase runoff from the project area. The project will be required to provide satisfactory drainage to available storm drains. XVI(d).No Impact. The project will not affect existing water supplies provided to the City. XVI(e).No Impact. The proposed amendment does not involve a project that will result in a determination by the watershed treatment provider that it has adequate capacity to serve a demand. XVI(f). Less Than Significant Impact. A net gain of seven (7) residential units will increase the demand for solid waste disposal; however, the level of solid waste generation is small in comparison to total solid waste disposal on a regional level. The City in an effort to reduce the. amount of solid waste disposed, currently provides recycling containers to residents: for the recycling of paper, glass, plastic and aluminum. G;\ Amy\ AMY\ WORD \CEQA\Initial Studies \Bowden Z 541.& DR- 27.doc a Z -541 and DR -27 September 22, 2004 - -- - — Page 20 XVI(g).No Impact. The proposed project will comply with all federal, state and local statutes relating to solid waste. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XVII(a). No Impact. The proposed project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of major periods of California history or prehistory. XVII(b). No Impact. The project does not have impacts that are individually limited by cumulatively considerable. A majority of the environmental factors analyzed within this initial study will have an impact by.the proposed project. XVII(c). No Impact. The project does not create environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. Less Than [I MANDATORY FINDINGS OF Potentially Significant Less Than SIGNIFICANCE Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Does the project: a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self - sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the /0 effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) C) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XVII(a). No Impact. The proposed project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of major periods of California history or prehistory. XVII(b). No Impact. The project does not have impacts that are individually limited by cumulatively considerable. A majority of the environmental factors analyzed within this initial study will have an impact by.the proposed project. XVII(c). No Impact. The project does not create environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. i &ne Vaft e coMftna! use Permit AUG 18 2004 �AdrrrinistratixeAdjusfinenE Cj Specific Plan P1" ANWiG ®WIIV pqR� _ Other bignamre Dais MY USE ONLY: Fite No.: 2-7 Fl C � Received by: Dais: F:/Pi an ing/Fo"s/Landapp. _. AUG 1 8 2004. City of Baldwin Park CITY BALDWIN PARK Justification Statement PLANNING ®NlsloN 3769 & 3779 Bresee Ave. August 18, 2004 This is an application for a zone reclassification in the form of a PD overlay for our property, which is in the RG zone. We are requesting the approval of our Development Plan and a Zone Re- Classification The property is currently located in the RG Zone. The property has been approved through Design Review for an eleven unit Planned Development consisting of eleven detached single - family homes and one common lot. Current Zoning codes and design guidelines allow for twelve homes to be built on these properties. Although we have a good design for a twelve home project, in an effort to retain an existing Coast Live Oak and increase common area open space, we have opted to submit a great eleven home design. The character of the neighborhood will be enhanced by the project, which incorporates Modem Craftsman architectural treatments and style, beautiful landscaping, and pride of ownership. The zone re- classification will not be detrimental to the surrounding properties as there is a current mix of high- density apartments and single- family homes with which our medium density proposal is consistent. Construction of the new units will be consistent with all applicable development standards in the PD and RG Zones. The City's General Plan designates the property as medium density residential. The Zone Re- classification will not change the dwelling unit density. Thank you for your consideration, Applicant: Bowden Development, Inc. Todd Bowden ORDINANCE NO. 1251 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK APPROVING A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM RG TO RG(PD) ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3773 -3779 BRESEE STREET (APPLICANT: BOWDEN DEVELOPMENT; CASE NUMBER Z -541). THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby find, determine and declare as follows: a) That the owner of certain real property filed an application for a change of zone from RG, Residential Garden to RG(PD), Residential Garden Planned Development on real property located at 3773 -3779 Bresee Street, described more particularly in the said application which is on file in the office of the Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City; and b) That pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Planning and Zoning Law (Sections 658000 et seq. Of the Government Code of the State of California) studies were commenced for the purposes of amending the Zoning Map of the City of Baldwin Park; and c) That a duly noticed public hearing was held upon said matter by the Planning Commission, and based upon the evidence presented, it was determined that the public necessity, convenience, and general welfare warranted that it recommend approval of the reclassification to RG(PD); and d) That the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said matter and based upon the evidence presented and each member of the Council being familiar with the site, it was determined that the public interest, necessity, convenience and general welfare warrant the approval of the Planning Commission recommendation and approval of the change in zone classification, herein described from RG to RG(PD). SECTION 2. That notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 153.630 - 153.646 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code, the Zoning Classification of the property be and is hereby reclassified from the RG zone to the RG(PD) zone. SECTION 3. That the City Council at the time of the public hearing on the above matter reviewed and considered the proposed Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact, and comments relating thereto. That the City Council, based Ordinance 1251 Page 2 on its public review, does hereby approve the proposed Negative Declaration, since there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant impact upon the environment. SECTION 4. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause a copy of the same to be published in a manner prescribed by law, and shall forward a copy of the same to the Secretary of the Planning Commission. The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall file the Notice of Determination and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact. PASSED AND APPROVED ON THE 2nd day of January 2005 MANUEL LOZANO, MAYOR ATTEST: ROSEMARY M. RAMIREZ, CMC CHIEF DEPUTY CITY CLERK C:\Amy\AMY\WORD\ResolutionsOrdinances\CounciI Ordinances\Z- 541.doc Ordinance 1251 Page 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss: CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ) I, ROSEMARY M. RAMIREZ, Chief Deputy City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was regularly introduced and placed upon it's first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on February 2, 2005. That there after said Ordinance 1251 was duly approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on February 16, 2005 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBER: NOES: COUNCILMEMBER: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBER: ROSEMARY M. RAMIREZ, CIVIC CHIEF DEPUTY CITY CLERK C:\Amy\AMY\WORD\ResolutionsOrdinances\CounciI Ordinances\Z- 541.doc RESOLUTION 2004 -089 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK APPROVING DEVELOPMENT PLAN ALLOWING THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN NINE (9) UNIT SINGLE- FAMILY DETACHED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND COMMON LOT, AND A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO SUBDIVIDE TWO LOTS INTO TEN LOTS FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES; (APPLICANT: BOWDEN DEVELOPMENT; CASE NO.: DR -27 AND TM- 61281; LOCATION: 3773 -3779 BRESEE STREET) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1 That the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby find, determine, and declare as follows: (a) That an application ( "Application ") for a zone change and development plan were submitted on behalf of the owner of certain real property, located at 3773 -3779 Bresee Street, shown as Parcels 8 and 20 on Page 3 of Map Book 8553 of the Los Angeles County Assessor's Records, in the City of Baldwin Park, described more particularly in the Application on file with the Planning Division; and (b) That the Application was sought to approve a Development Plan to allow the construction of an nine (9) unit single - family detached planned development and common lot, pursuant to Section 153.271 of the City's Zoning Code; and a Tentative Tract Map to subdivide two (2) lots into ten (10) lots for residential purposes, pursuant to Section 152.07 of the City's Municipal Code. (c) That a duly noticed public hearing was held on said Application by the City council, and based upon evidence presented including applicable staff reports, it was determined that the facts as required by the Baldwin Park Municipal Code for the granting of such Application are present and that the application should be granted, subject to the terms of this Resolution. SECTION 2. That the City Council does hereby adopt the following Findings of Fact applicable to the application for Tentative Tract Map Approval: (a) That the site for the proposed development is physically suitable as the topography of the site is essentially flat and will be developed with nine (9) single - family dwelling residences at a density allowed by the City's Zoning Code provided that a Development Plan and Resolution 2004 -089 February 2, 2005 Page 2 of 9 Zone Change (adding the Planned Development (PD) Overlay) are approved; and (b) That the design of the subdivision will not be a threat to the Health, Safety and Welfare of the citizens of Baldwin Park as the proposed project is a nine (9) unit single - family detached residential subdivision which is compatible with the surrounding multi- family residential zoning designations; and (c) That the Tentative Tract Map will be consistent with the City of Baldwin Park's General Plan, provided approval of the Development Plan and Zone Change will allow for the site to be developed with detached single- family residences which is consistent with the project proposal; and (d) That development of the sites in accordance with the Tentative Tract Map will not affect future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities for the area as the natural, flat topography of the site and the future development of nine (9) 2 -story dwelling units will not affect said opportunities; and (e) That the proposed Tentative Map is in an area serviced by Valley County Water District. The District has indicated that the proposal will not violate any water quality standards for the Water District. SECTION 3. That the City Council approve the Development Plan` and Tentative Tract Map, as herein described, subject to the following conditions; (a) That the subject Property shall be developed and maintained in substantial compliance with Exhibit "A" to the staff report, dated February 2, 2005, except as modified herein by these conditions; and (b) That electric garage door openers shall be provided for each unit; and (c) That sectional roll -up garage doors shall be provided for each unit; and (d) That all landscaped areas must be separated from vehicular areas by a 6" continuous concrete curb; and (e) That a decorative block wall shall be provided surrounding the property. Decorative block walls with brick cap will be required along all exterior property lines that are visible from the public Resolution 2004 -089 February 2, 2005 Page 3 of 9 right -of -way and the common driveway, proposed materials are subject to Planning Division approval. Interior property line delineator walls shall be precision block with a brick cap; and (f) Each of the homes shall be provided with motion sensor lights at each garage and main level entrance door. Exterior lighting shall be- decorative and automatically controlled. Manufacturer's literature shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval when plan are submitted to the Building Division for plan check; and (g) Each unit shall be pre -wired for an alarm system; and (h) A detailed landscaping plan shall be provided- indicating the size, location, and species of all trees, shrubs, ground cover, and any other plan life proposed. The submitted landscaping plan shall include the modified open space area. This plan shall be submitted during plan check phase; and (i) All Landscaping shall be automatically irrigated and an irrigation plan shall be submitted during the plan check phase; and (j) That the applicant shall provide a letter from Waste Management agreeing to provide individual refuse pick -up services to each residential unit in lieu of providing a trash enclosure; and (k) That the applicant shall submit a copy of the proposed covenants, conditions and restrictions to the Planning Division prior to obtaining building permits; and (1) That the CC &R's shall reflect that any future addition to individual units shall be limited to a patio cover which shall not exceed 25% of the rear yard area and shall meet all zoning code requirements; and (m) That the CC &R's shall reflect that vehicular parking within identified guest parking stalls shall not exceed seven (7) continuous days; and (n) That any walls surrounding the proposed easement area shall be decorative and shall match any proposed and /or existing walls. Decorative walls shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Division; and Resolution 2004 -089 February 2, 2005 Page 4 of 9 (o) That the Developer /Applicant shall work with Planning Division staff to provide a small recreational amenity within the smaller common open space area; and (p) That the Applicant shall work with the Planning Division to provide a decorative entry statement along both sides of the driveway entry area. At a minimum the entry statement shall provide the address range for the units within the project; and (q) That the Developer /Applicant shall provide verification from the Engineering Division that the proposed easement for the properties at 3763 -3767 Bresee Avenue will not affect the Tentative Tract Map 061281; and (r) That the Applicant shall provide two (2) revised site plans identifying the proposed easement area; and (s) The Applicant shall provide a complete set of construction drawings, site plans, elevations, floor plans, landscaping plans, irrigation plans, etc... in a digital format to the Building and Planning Divisions. Any changes in the field during the construction phase to the approved set of plans will result in `as- built' plans being submitted in digital format to the Building and Planning Divisions; and (t) That the `guest parking' stalls located adjacent to the open space areas in the rear and the larger open space area shall be treated with grasscrete, which will soften the appearance of concrete and yet allow vehicular parking; and - (u) That the Applicant shall provide two (2) revised site plans identifying the proposed easement area; and (v) That the Applicant shall stripe the proposed easement area and label the area as `No Parking'. Signs shall also be posted within the easement area which state that the area shall not be utilized for parking purposes; and (w) That all utilities shall be undergrounded. This includes utility connections to each individual unit, as well as along the frontage of the property; and (x) Provide the following information upon the Plan Check submittal: . Three (3) architectural plans and one (1) extra site plan for the Fire Department Resolution 2004 -089 February 2, 2005 Page 5 of 9 ii. Three (3) complete sets of Plans for the City. iii. Two sets of the following are required: 1. Soil Reports 2. Structural Calculations 3. Title 24 Energy Calculations (y) That the applicant shall comply with all Los Angeles County Fire Department comments; and (z) All conditions of the State Map Subdivision Act and City's Subdivision Ordinance must be met prior to recordation; and (aa) All conditions of the Los Angeles County Fire Department must be met prior to recordation. A written notification or approval plan from the Fire Department must be submitted to the City; and (bb) All special assessments and utilities or sewer connection fees are to be paid prior to recording the final map; and (cc) The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including water, gas, electricity, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the respective utility companies' standards. Easements shall be provided as required; and (dd) Prior to recordation of the final map, a written certification from the Water District, GTE, SCE, SCG and Adelphia Cable stating that adequate facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed development shall be submitted to the City. Such letter must be issued by the utility company at least 30 days prior approval to final map; and (ee) A title report/guarantee showing all fee owners and interest holders must be submitted when a final map is submitted for plan check. This account must remain open until the final map is filed with the County Recorder. An updated title report/guarantee must be submitted ten (10) working days prior to approval of final map; and (ff) The final map shall be based on a field survey; and (gg) All surveying for the proposed development will be done by the developer, including the establishment of centerline ties; and Resolution 2004 -089 February 2, 2005 Page 6 of 9 (hh) The surveyor's closure sheets must be enclosed with the final map. (ii) New boundary monuments must be set in accordance with the City standards and subject to approval by the City Engineer. (jj) All easements existing prior to final map approval must be identified. If an easement is blanket or indeterminate in nature, a statement to that effect must be shown on the final map in lieu of its location. (kk) All site grading, landscaping, irrigation, street improvements, sewer and storm drain improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to final map approval. (II) Grading plan (24" x 36 ") must be designed in compliance with recommendations of the final detailed soils and engineering geology reports. All remedial earthworks shall be incorporated on the City's standard Mylar. Plans shall be submitted on the City's standard Mylar. (mm) Grading plan must be signed and stamped by a registered Civil Engineer. (nn) Provide a sewer plan signed by a registered Civil Engineer, designed and drawn to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Must be submitted if an on -site main line facility is proposed. Each building must have a separate and independent connection to a main line sewer (oo) Submit to this office a Soils Report signed by a Registered Soils Engineer /Registered Civil Engineer. (pp) The following off -site improvements must be existing or guaranteed for: i. Parcel must have separate and independent connections to the main sewer separate connection of Fine. ii. Install new 8" sewer line and manhole for the 6" laterals going in each separate unit. iii. Install landscaped parkway and irrigational system for the entire frontage of the property (Bresee side). Resolution 2004-089 February 2, 2005 Page 7 of 9 iv. Remove and replace sections of broken curb and gutter along the frontage of proposed property. V. Provide streetlights for proposed street per City Master Plan. vi. Remove existing driveway approaches not being utilized and replace with full height (8" curb). vii. All proposed driveway approaches shall meet the ADA requirements. viii. Install water services and gas services for the proposed development area. ix. Grind 1 1/2 AC and overlay 1 '/2 AC from curb to curb along Bresee Avenue. X. Plant two trees along Bresee Avenue per City Standard. A. Install landscaped parkway and irrigation system along Bresee Avenue (frontage of proposed development area). xii. Conduct traffic study and submit to the Engineering Department for review and approval. (qq) A complete hydrology study will be required; and (rr) The developer shall submit to the City Engineer the total cost estimate for bonding purposes of all off-site improvements prior to approval of the final map; and (ss) If the City accepts approval of the final map prior to the completion of all required public improvements, the developer shall enter into a subdivision agreement with the City and shall post the appropriate security; and (tt) A copy of the final map reduced to 8 1/2" x 11 " shall be submitted to the Engineering Division prior to meeting with the Zoning Administrator for the subject parcel map; and (uu) Approval of this tentative map does not constitute approval of the site plan or building footprints; and (vv) The City is being served by a cable TV franchise awarded to Adelphia Cable. All residential units constructed shall be pre- wired and made ready for cable TV connections; and Resolution 2004 -089 February 2, 2005 Page 8 of 9 (ww) After the final map records, a Mylar and two blue line prints shall be submitted to the Engineering Division at no cost to the City. Final occupancy will not be granted until the recorded map is received by the Engineering Division; and (xx) CC & R must be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney prior to map recordation; and (yy) Provide maps in digital format to the County of Los Angeles per County requirement; and (zz) The final map must be recorded within 24 months or all proceedings shall be terminated; and (aaa) That the Applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval within six (6) months after the date of approval of DR -27 or the entitlements shall become null and void; and (bbb) That the applicant shall sign a notarized affidavit within twenty (20) days of the date of this resolution stating that the applicant has read and accepts all of the conditions of approval. SECTION 4. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and forward a copy hereof to the Planning Division and the Applicant. PASSED AND APPROVED this 2nd day of February 2005. MANUEL LOZANO, MAYOR Resolution 2004 -089 February 2, 2005 Page 9 of 9 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES)SS. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ) 1, Rosemary M. Ramirez, Chief Deputy City Clerk do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2004 -089 was duly and regularly approved and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 2nd day of February 2005 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ROSEMARY M. RAMIREZ, CIVIC CHIEF DEPUTY CITY CLERK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA IT OF L WIN PARK STAFF REPORT E N0. BALDWIN P . A - R • K TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Jack Wong, Director of Housi g d Community Developme DATE February 2, 2005 SUBJECT: Continued from January 19, 2005; A request for consideration of an amendment to the General Plan (AGP -109), a Zone Change (Z -544), a Development Plan (DR -29), a Zone Variance (V -696) and a Tentative Tract Map (TM- 61346) - Location: 819 Frazier Street; Applicant: D.C. Corporation. PURPOSE This report discusses a request for: 1) An Amendment to the City's General Plan Land Use Element to redesignate the subject property from Single - Family Residential to Multi- Family Residential; and 2) A Zone Change from OI, Office Industrial to R- 3(PD), Multi - Family Residential Planned Development; and 3) A Development Plan to allow the construction of a twelve (12) unit single- family detached planned development and common lot; and 4) A Zone Variance to allow less than the minimum required amount of guest parking spaces for a planned development; and 5) A Tentative Tract Map to subdivide two (2) lots into thirteen (13) lots for residential purposes. This report recommends that the City Council deny the requests, consistent with the Planning Commission's recommendations for denial. CE N TICING A Notice of Public Hearing was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and mailed to all property owners within a 300 -foot radius of the subject properties on December 30, 2004. AGP -109, Z -544, ZV -696, DR -29 and TM -61346 February 2, 2005 Page 2 The Planning Division has completed an environmental analysis, and has determined that the project will not have a significant impact upon the environment. Pursuant to that information, a Draft Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact has been prepared pending approval by the City Council. The subject property has a current General Plan Land Use designation of Single - Family Residential and is inconsistently zoned OI, Office Industrial. (Staff had anticipated that the zoning would be made consistent with the General Plan in connection with other zoning amendments in approximately six months.) The property is irregular in shape and contains approximately 38,469 square feet (.73 acres) of net area. The total site area is essentially flat and contains an existing single - family residence, which will eventually be demolished. The adjacent zoning and land uses are listed in the table below. Table 1 Adjacent Zoning & Land Use Adjacent Property Location Zoning Property Use North 1 -10 FWY San Bernardino Freeway South R -1 Single-Family Residences East R -1 Single-Family Residences West Athol St. Overpass — R -1 I Single-Family Residences yl,• GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT / ZONE CHANGE The General Plan Amendment and Zone Change are prerequisites to the preparation of the subject property for the proposed construction of a twelve (12) unit single - family detached planned development and common lot. In order for the development to take place, both the General Plan designation and zoning on the property will need to be changed to permit density consistent with Multi- Family Residential use of the property as well as a PD overlay to alter the otherwise required development standards. If the requested General Plan and Zone change are not approved, the existing density of the current general plan designation (single- family residential) would allow for seven (7) single - family detached units. However, since the City is still in process of updating the Zoning Code and Zoning Map to be consistent with the newly updated General Plan, a zone change from 01, Office Industrial to R -1, Single- Family Residential would still be required at this location. Recently, the City Council adopted an update to the General Plan that redesignated the subject property's land use designation from Office Industrial to Single- Family AGP -109, Z -544, ZV -696, DR -29 and TM -61346 February 2, 2005 Page 3 Residential. This change was consistent with the surrounding properties. These areas are fully built out with well- maintained housing developed at densities consistent with their Single Family Residential General Plan and zoning designations. The requested General Plan amendment does not compliment the existing neighboring properties nor is the proposed zoning in compliance with the newly updated General Plan. This zone change will also create a situation that is called "spot zoning ", in that a small area of land will be zoned in a manner incompatible with the immediate R -1 zoned and single - family residential designated properties surrounding it. Spot zoning has been held to be illegal when the City Council acts "unreasonably or without substantial evidence" because no public benefit exists for the classification. Therefore, staff is of the opinion that the General Plan amendment and zoning requests be denied based on incompatibility with the adjacent single - family residential uses. In addition to the change in zoning to multi - family, the applicant is requesting a zone change for the entire site to add the planned development (PD) overlay. The Planned Development (PD) designation allows for flexible development standards to encourage and achieve innovative developments exhibiting a superior architecture and site design quality. Planned Development projects must, however, be compatible with, and enhance the surrounding neighborhood. Because the density proposed for this project significantly exceeds that of the surrounding neighborhood, staff is of the opinion that this project does not accomplish the objectives of the _Planned Development overlay zone. A The applicant is proposing a twelve (12) unit single- family detached housing development with a common lot. According to the plans submitted to the Planning Division, the twelve (12) single - family homes will have access from a private driveway entering from Frazier Street. The private driveway is twenty -six (26) feet wide; a public street would be required to be at least forty (40) feet wide. Each residential unit will have its own enclosed private open space, ranging between 261 square feet and 1,529 square feet, which will be directly accessible from within that unit. This particular design will orientate one of the homes toward Frazier Street. Additional features of the project include: colored stamped concrete within the driveway area, decorative block walls and landscaping within common open space areas. According to the floor plans and elevations, all residential units will be two -story with livable floor areas ranging from 1,416 square feet to 2,009 square feet (excluding the garages) and consist of four (4) bedrooms, 21/2 bathrooms and a two -car garage, with the exception of Plan T, which contains three (3) bathrooms. The table below provides detailed information on unit floor areas (including garages), private open space areas and lot sizes: AGP -109, Z -544, ZV -696, DR -29 and TM -61346 February 2, 2005 Page 4 Table 2 Unit Floor Areas and Open Space Lot Number Floor Area Private Open Space Area Lot Size 1 2,066 532 2,459 s .ft. 2 1,877 444 2,170 s .ft. 3 2,066 525 2,480 s .ft. 4 1,877 461 2,170 s .ft. 5 2,066 525 2,440 s .ft. 6 1,877 482 2,071 s .ft. 7 1,877 804 3,231 s .ft. 8 1,925 651 2,277 s .ft. 9 2,469 842 3,233 s .ft. 10 2,469 1529 4,128 s .ft 11 2,264 261 2,667 s .ft. 12 1,925 792 2,560 s .ft. 13 NA NA 6,582 s .ft. - Building Height and Architectural Design The applicant has proposed to employ different designs and materials that will provide variety and aesthetic interest throughout the project. The exterior elevations of the proposed homes will have a mix of classic Spanish Mediterranean style architectural design. Design elements include a mixture of stucco- finished elevations, faux shutters, wrought iron and decorative veneers. Roofing material will consist of concrete tile. Although there are only five different floor plans proposed, each of the proposed units has been designed to avoid a "monolithic" appearance. The exterior walls and rooflines are staggered along both the vertical and horizontal planes. The roof and wall variations, along with the subtle changes in colors, help to visually reduce the mass and bulk of the buildings. Varying materials are utilized along the front elevation to emphasize an appealing view from the common areas. The project will involve the construction of six (6) foot high block walls around the perimeter of each unit to enclose the private open space areas. Any walls that are visible from the public right -of -way will be decorative block with a cap. ZONE VARIANCE Under the requested zoning designation, the City's Zoning Code requires that the development provide a total of fifteen (15) guest parking spaces on -site. However, the site plan identifies only two parking spaces. The zone variance is being requested in order to allow less than the minimum required number of spaces for a twelve unit planned development. This type of variance request has been approved in the past for a residential project developed with a PD overlay. However, in the previous cases, AGP -109, Z -544, ZV -696, DR -29 and TM -61346 February 2, 2005 Paae 5 there existed minimum driveway depths of eighteen feet, which can accommodate two vehicles without encroaching into the common driveway area. Only 3 of the 12 driveway areas meet the minimum dimension of eighteen feet needed to accommodate parked vehicles. Therefore, staff is unable to recommend an approval for the requested variance. The Tentative Tract Map illustrates the twelve (12) building footprints for the residential units, front yard areas and private rear yards. The thirteenth lot represents the common areas accessible to all owners within the development such as the guest parking stalls and the common private driveway. Approval of the tract map is possible only if the General Plan amendment, zone change and zone variance are approved, since the tract map is otherwise inconsistent with both the General Plan designation and zoning ordinances applicable to the property. AGP -109, Z -544, ZV -696, DR -29 and TM -61346 February 2, 2005 Page 6 applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of such property, which do not generally apply to other property in the same zone in that the property is flat and undeveloped, and the proposed development can be modified to provide the number of required guest parking spaces; and 2. That such variance is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property similarly situated, but which is denied to the property in question because there is no topographic or other conditions which prevent it from being developed with the required number of parking spaces. 3. That the granting of the variance will be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the adjacent property since the lack of guest parking would place the burden of parking on adjacent neighborhood streets; and 4. That the granting of the variance will adversely affect the General Plan of the City in that the General Plan designation of the subject property is single- family residential and the proposed multi - family development will generate significant amounts of extra vehicles. FINDINGS OF FACT — TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 1. That the site for the proposed development is not physically suitable for the development of twelve (12) single - family detached residential dwelling units unless an Amendment to the City's General Plan, a Development Plan and Zone Change (to R -3(PD) Residential Garden Planned Development for the entire site) are approved; and 2. That the design of the subdivision will create a threat to the Health, Safety and Welfare of the citizens of Baldwin Park as the proposed density of the project is not compatible with the surrounding single - family residential zoning designations, and uses which are well- established and well - maintained at a significantly greater density; and 3. That the Tentative Tract Map is not consistent with the City of Baldwin Park's General Plan, in that the land use designation of the subject property is single- family residential and the requested zone change will not be in compliance or compatible with the General Plan land use designations; and AGP -109, Z -544, ZV -696, DR -29 and TM -61346 February 2, 2005 Page 7 4. That development of the site in accordance with the Tentative Tract Map will not affect future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities for the area as the natural topography of the site is flat and the future development of twelve (12) 2 -story dwelling units will therefore not affect said opportunities; and 5. That the proposed Tentative Map is in an area serviced by San Gabriel Valley Water District and the District has indicated that the proposal will not violate any water quality standards for the Water District. Although the Planning Commission and staff are recommending denial, if the City Council determines to approve the General Plan amendment and zone change, the following Conditions of Approval are recommended:' CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. That the subject Property shall be developed and maintained in substantial compliance with Exhibit "A ", dated January 19, 2005, except as modified herein by these conditions; and 2. That electric garage door openers shall be provided for each unit; and 3. That sectional roll -up garage doors shall be provided for each unit; and 4. That all landscaped areas must be separated from vehicular areas by a 6" continuous concrete curb; and 5. That a decorative block wall shall be provided surrounding the property. Decorative block walls with brick cap will be required along all exterior property lines that are visible from the public right -of -way and the common driveway, proposed materials are subject to Planning Division approval. Interior property line delineator walls shall be precision block with a brick cap; and 6. Each of the homes shalt be provided with decorative motion sensor lights at each garage and main level entrance door. Exterior lighting shall be decorative and automatically controlled. Manufacturer's literature shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval when plan are submitted to the Building Division for plan check; and 7. Each unit shall be pre -wired for an alarm system; and 8. A detailed landscaping plan shall be provided indicating the size, location, and species of all trees, shrubs, ground cover, and any other plan life proposed. This plan shall be submitted during plan check phase; and 9. All Landscaping shall be automatically irrigated and a detailed irrigation plan shall be submitted during the plan check phase; and AGP -109, Z -544, ZV -696, DR -29 and TM -61346 February 2, 2005 Page 8 10. That the applicant shall submit a copy of the proposed covenants, conditions and restrictions to the Planning Division prior to obtaining building permits. Said CC &Rs must be approved by the City Attorney for satisfaction with City requirements prior to issuance of such permits; and 11. That the CC &R's shall reflect that any future addition to individual units shall be limited to a patio cover which shall not exceed 25% of the rear yard area and shall meet all zoning code requirements; and 12. That the CC &R's shall reflect that vehicular parking within identified guest parking stalls shall not exceed 24 consecutive hours; and 13. That all utilities shall be undergrounded. This includes utility connections to each individual unit, as well as along the frontage of the property along Frazier Street; and 14. Provide the following information upon the Plan Check submittal: A. Three (3) architectural plans and one (1) extra site plan for the Fire Department B. Three (3) complete sets of Plans for the City: C. Two sets of the following are required: i. Soil Reports ii. Structural Calculations iii. Title 24 Energy Calculations 15. The conditions of the State Map Subdivision Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance must be met prior to recordation; and 16. All conditions of the Los Angeles County Fire Department must be met prior to recordation. A written notification or approval plan from the Fire Department must be submitted to the City; and 17. All special assessments and utilities or sewer connection fees are to be paid prior to recording the final map; and 13. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including water, gas, electricity, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the respective utility companies' standards. Easements shall be provided as required; and 19. Prior to recordation of the final map, a written certification from the Water District, GTE, SCE, SCG and Adelphia Cable stating that adequate facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed development shall be submitted to the City. The AGP -109, Z -544, ZV -696, DR -29 and TM -61346 February 2, 2005 Paae 9 utility companies must issue such letter at least 30 days prior to final map approval; and 20. A title report/guarantee showing all fee owners and interest holders must be submitted when a final map is submitted for plan check. This account must remain open until the final map is filed with the County Recorder. An updated title report/guarantee must be submitted ten (10) working days prior to final map approval; and 21. The final map shall be based on a field survey; and 22. All surveying for the proposed development will be done by the developer, including the establishment of centerline ties; and 23. The surveyor's closure sheets must be enclosed with the final map; and 24. New boundary monuments must be set in accordance with City standards and subject to approval by the City Engineer; and 25. All easements existing prior to final map approval must be identified. If an easement is blanket or indeterminate in nature, a statement to that effect must be shown on the final map in lieu of its location; and 26. The following improvement plans, prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and drawn in accordance with the conditions of approval and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, must be submitted to the City's Engineering Division; a. Grading Plan b. Sewer Plan C. Street Plan d. Street Light Plan (per City Master Plan) 27. That the Developer shall submit a complete Hydrology study of the Project area and surrounding area affected by the development; and 28. That if the Los Angeles County Fire Department required additional hydrants or water pressure in addition to what already exists, or if the Los Angeles County Fire Department require a fire access road during construction, no building permits shall be issued by the City's Building Division (except demolition or grading permits) prior to written approval from the Los Angeles County Fire Department that either the conditions have been met or that the City may go ahead and issue building permits; and 29. That no grading, building, demolition or construction permits shall be issued by the City prior to the applicant having ownership of the entire site; and final map approval; and AGP -109, Z -544, ZV -696, DR-29 and TM -61346 February 2, 2005 Page 10 30. Submit to the office a Soils Report signed by a Registered Soils Engineer /Registered Civil Engineer; and 31. The following off -site improvements must be existing or guaranteed for: a) Construct new driveway approaches per plan. All driveway approaches shall meet ADA (American with Disability Act) requirements. b) Plant one street tree for each unit on the proposed development project. c) All parcels must have separate and independent connections to the main sewer line. d) Install water services and gas services for the development area per water and gas company. e) Provide maps in digital format to the County of Los Angeles per County requirements. f) Provide street lights for the proposed street per city master plan. g) Construct (2) two handicap ramps per City standard at the intersection of proposed street and Frazier Street. h) Apply for vacation of sanitary sewer easement. 32. The developer shall submit to the City Engineer the total cost estimate for bonding purposes of all off -site improvements prior to approval of the final map; and 33. All existing and proposed structures shall meet current zoning code requirements; and 34. If the City accepts approval of the final map prior to the completion of all required public improvements, the developer shall enter into a subdivision agreement with the City and shall post the appropriate security; and 35. A copy of the final map reduced to 8 1/z " x 11" shall be submitted to the Engineering Division prior to final tract map approval; and 36. Approval of this tentative map does not constitute approval of the site plan or building footprints; and 37. The City is being served by a cable TV franchise awarded to Adelphia Cable. All residential units constructed shall be prewired and made ready for cable TV connections; and 38. After the final map records, a mylar and two blueline prints shall be submitted to the Engineering Division at no cost to the City. Final occupancy will not be granted until the recorded map is received by the Engineering Division; and 39. Provide a copy of the final map on a disc in PC format; and AGP -109, Z -544, ZV -696, DR -29 and TM -61346 February 2, 2005 Page 11 40. The developer is required to obtain a General Construction Storm Water Activity Permit (GCASWP) from the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board; and 41. The developer is required to submit a Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board approved Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) copy to the Department of Public Works for review. The SWPPP must always be kept on site and must be made available for review by the City inspection staff and the State of California Regional Water Quality Control Board upon request; and 42. An Erosion Control Plan (ECP) must also be submitted to the Engineering Division for review and approval; and 43. A Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) must be submitted along with other project plans for City approval. The project plan shall contain requirements specified by the City based on a project Standard Urban Water Mitigation Plan Evaluation Form to be provided by the Engineering Division; and 44. The approval of the proposed project shall be contingent upon provision of an assessment by a certified Traffic Engineer, of access road(s) to the subject properties. Traffic conditions shall be analyzed for the opening year. Occupancy permits shall be issued upon approval of sufficient and effective circulation at entry and exit points. In conjunction with the aforementioned assessments a warrant assessment shall be conducted to evaluate any potential installation of stop signs or traffic signal at the proposed entry /exit points. The developer shall implement, prepare submittals and pay for all costs /fees related to the Traffic Engineer's recommendations; and 45. The developer shall assure access for maintenance of the advertisement freeway billboard; and 46. The final map must be recorded within 24 months or all proceedings shall be terminated. ATTACHMENTS. #1 - Exhibit "A" - Development Plan, dated February 2, 2004 #2 - Exhibit "B" - Existing Zoning and Land Use Designations #3 - Exhibit "C" - Proposed Zoning and Land Use Designation #4 - Environmental Data — Draft Negative Declaration and Initial Study #5 - Application Form and Statements #6 - Resolution 2005 -006 PMAF I a pJAPI gill ............... it —.1—I....... ......... .......... I a C 1' Y q $ 4; J ®N¢ o \ u\ LL W F` TI LU p R 5 \\ W N S J \\ \•� \ *!IJ' U 5 LL 6 u BS BS oW I\ 283'/ 36.36' R ir K i / 4 fig, I till, r3e i$3 eeee a4 k @8C � I$ p R 5 BS BS oW Y n E € y i CITY OF BALD Ili PARK NEGATIVE DECLARATION BALDWIN P � A, R- IC DATE: December 1, 2004 APPLICANT: D.C. Corporation TYPE OF General Plan Amendment (AGP), Zone Change (Z), PERMIT: Development Plan (DR), Zone Variance (ZV), and Tentative Tract Map (TM) FILE NO.: AGP -109, Z -544, DR -29, ZV -696 and TM- 61346 LOCATION OF PROJECT: 819 Frazier Street, Baldwin Park DESRIPTION OF PROJECT: A request for consideration of an amendment to the City's General Plan Land Use Element, to redesignate the subject property from Single - Family Residential to Multi - Family Residential, a zone change from OI, Office Industrial to R- 3(PD), Multi - Family Residential Planned Development, a development plan to allow the construction of a twelve (12) unit single- family detached planned development and common lot, a zone variance to allow less than the minimum required amount of guest parking stalls for a planned development and a tentative tract map to subdivide two (2) lots into thirteen (13) lots for residential purposes. It is the opinion of the ® Zoning Administrator ® Planning Commission ® City Council ❑ Other that, upon review of the project, it has determined that the project will not have a significant effect upon the environment. Mitigation Measures are attached RX are not required (Signature) Principal Planner (Title) Date(s) of Public Notice: x Legal advertisement— December 30, 2004 Posting of the properties x Written notice — December 30, 2004 (msw\forms\negdec) 1/97 DRAFT INITIAL STUDY, ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 1. Project Title: A request for approval of an amendment to the City's General Plan Land Use Element, to redesignate the subject property from Single - Family Residential to Multi - Family Residential and a zone change from OI, Office Industrial to R- 3(PD), Multi - Family Residential Planned Development. A Development Plan to allow the construction of a twelve (12) unit single - family detached planned development and common lot. An additional request is for approval of a zone variance to allow less than the minimum required amount of guest parking spaces for a planned development. A related request is for approval of a tentative tract map to subdivide two (2) lot into thirteen (13) lots for residential purposes. 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Baldwin Park 14403 E. Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, CA 91706 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Salvador Lopez Jr., Assistant Planner (626) 813 -5261 4. Project Location: 819 Frazier Street 5. Assessor's Parcel Number: 8559- 011 -002 & 008 6. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: D. C. Corporation 2149 E. Garvey North, Suite A -12 West Covina, CA 91791 7. General Plan Designation: Single- Family Residential (current) Multi- Family Residential Planned Development (proposed) . Zoning: OI (current) R -3(PD) (proposed) 9. Surrounding Land Uses Incorporated in 1956, the City of Baldwin Park is located and Settings; approximately 17 miles east of downtown Los Angeles. The intersection of the 1 -10 (San Bernardino) and 1 -605 (San Gabriel River) freeways lies near the southwest corner of this 6.8 square mile City. Although Baldwin Park is predominantly a residential bedroom community, recent efforts have placed a greater emphasis on promoting commercial and industrial land uses. However, the City is near "build -out', focusing efforts on the Redevelopment of land, especially within close proximity to the freeway. According to the 2000 Census, Baldwin Park has approximately 75,900 persons. This is more than double the population in 1960. Baldwin Park is predominantly a Hispanic working class community, although between the 1990 and 2000 Census has experienced a recent increase in its Asian population. Furthermore, the City has a considerably larger than average household size than the County average, suggesting increased pressure on the City's housing stock and the provision of services. City of Baldwl"'n Park 10. Description ofProject: the Planning Division has received an application for Development Plan to develop e twelve (12) unit ainQ|n-hsnni|y detached residential development. Currently, the zoning for the subject property is [>|. Office Industrial and the General Plan designation is Single-Family Residential. In order for the development to take place, an Anl8Ddnngnt to the City's General Plan and a zone change will be required to redesignate the property from single-family residential to rnuUi'f8nni/y residential. Additionally, aZone Change toadd 8 Planned Development (PD) overlay is required. Project Characteristics: A request for approval of an amendment to the City's General Plan Land Use Bement, to redesignate the subject property from Single-Family Residential to Multi-Family Residential and a zone change from C)|' Office Industrial to R-3/pO\' MuUb'Fannik/ Residential Planned Development. A Development Plan to allow the construction of a hw8|va (12) unit single-family detached planned development and common lot. An additional request iu for approval [f8 zone variance hn allow less than the minimum required amount ofguest parking spaces fora planned development. A related request is for approval of a tentative tract rnep to subdivide two (2) lots into thirteen (13) |uhn for residential purposes. 11'' Other public agencies whose approval ia required /e-g', permits, financing approval, or participation agreement) , No additional public approvals beyond Planning Commission and City Council will be required for ` this project. i 12' References The following are also referenced where appropriate in the Environmental Checklist Form: a. General Plan ` . b. Municipal Code ` C. Zoning Code d. Emergency Operations Coordinator e. Geological Map—Liquefaction Zones EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1\ A brief explanation is required for all answers. except "No Impact" answers that are ` adequately supported by the information sources 8 lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced /nfonnabVO sources show that the impact simply does not apply tV projects like the one involved (e.g.' the project falls outside 8 fault rupture zone). A ''No |0pao[' answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factor as well 8S general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on 8 project-specific screening analysis.) 2) All answers must bake account of the vvho|g action involved, including offsite as well as VnSite' cumulative ae well aSp 'eot|ove|.|ndireotoavvaU8Sdireot and construction aswell 8S operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that @ particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, |eea than ' significant with nnh§oahon' or k»en than significant. "Potentially Significant |nnpaoy is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. |f there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an E}R is ' 4) ' "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant |nnp8nt toa"Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to 8 |8SS than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XV/|. "Earlier Analyses," may be cross- referBnoed). 5\ Earlier analyses may be used vvhara. pursuant b>the tiring, program BR, ov other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an aedierE}R or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) ` Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. '- ' b) , Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were . within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal nt8ndanJa' and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. ' C) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation K8oauuroS |noOrponeted'" describe the mitigation measures, which were incorporated ' or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site- specific conditions for the project. 0) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information ' sources for potential impacts (e.g., general p/ena' zoning ordinances). Reference to 8 previously prepared nroute/de document should, where eppropri8tg, include reference to the page or pages where the statement iosubstantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or ' individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. ` ` 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to 8 project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. . g\ The explanation Of each issue should identify: a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b\ The nnh§g8UoD measure identified, if any, t0 reduce the impact to |eea than ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: Explanation of Checklist Judgements: I(a). No Impact. The project will not have an adverse affect on a scenic vista or result in the obstruction of any scenic views. I (b). No Impact. This project will not result in the damage or destruction of scenic resources or historical buildings. 1(c). No Impact. This project will not substantially degrade the existing visual character and quality of the site and its surroundings. Through the Design Review process, the project has been designed so as to ensure no aesthetic offensive site, building or mechanical equipment will be open to public view. I (d). No Impact. This project will not create any new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the residential zones. Less Than Less Than Potentially Significant Potentially Significant Less Than Significant I AESTHETICS Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Impact Mitigation Impact In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are Incorporation Would the project: E] a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an within a state scenic highway? optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and C) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or farmland. Would the prpiect. quality of the site and its surroundings? a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Explanation of Checklist Judgements: I(a). No Impact. The project will not have an adverse affect on a scenic vista or result in the obstruction of any scenic views. I (b). No Impact. This project will not result in the damage or destruction of scenic resources or historical buildings. 1(c). No Impact. This project will not substantially degrade the existing visual character and quality of the site and its surroundings. Through the Design Review process, the project has been designed so as to ensure no aesthetic offensive site, building or mechanical equipment will be open to public view. I (d). No Impact. This project will not create any new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the residential zones. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: I I (a). No Impact. The proposed project will not convert any type of farmland to a non-agricultural use. I I (b). No Impact. The proposed project will not conflict with zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than 11 AGRICULTURE RESOURCES Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the prpiect. a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? C) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of El 11 1-1 Farmland, to non-agricultural use? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: I I (a). No Impact. The proposed project will not convert any type of farmland to a non-agricultural use. I I (b). No Impact. The proposed project will not conflict with zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract. II(c). No Impact. The project will not result in the conversion of farm land to non - agricultural uses. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: III(a). No Impact. The proposed project does not conflict with any applicable air quality plan. The City of Baldwin Park is located within the South Coast Air Basin which is a non - attainment area for selective pollutants. Air pollution is a regional problem. Pollution levels in Baldwin Park are a result of not only local emissions, but also of those throughout the region. 111(b). No Impact. The project will not result in a cumulative net increase of pollutants for which the region is in non - attainment. 111(c). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the region is in non - attainment. The Southern California Association of Governments and the South Coast Air Quality Management District have adopted a South Coast Air Quality Management Plan ( SCAQMP). The proposed project is consistent with that plan and will not have a significant impact upon air quality. However, there will be temporary increases in air pollutant emissions during the construction phase. Construction dust and air pollution, however, will be reduced with the following procedures. Procedures to reduce air pollution include the following: 1) That the applicant adhere to the SCAQMD Rule 403 insuring the clean up construction related dirt on approach routes to the site. 2) The watering techniques shall be employed to partially mitigate the impact of construction generated dust particles. 3) Maintenance and servicing of construction equipment to minimize exhaust emissions. 4) Halting of construction activities during Stage 1 and Stage 2 smog alerts. 111(d). No Impact. The proposed project will not expose any nearby sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Potentially Less Than Significant With Less Than III AIR QUALITY Significant Significant No Impact Impact p Mitigation Impact p Incorporation Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relief upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: El a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? El b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? C) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? El 1-1 11 e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: III(a). No Impact. The proposed project does not conflict with any applicable air quality plan. The City of Baldwin Park is located within the South Coast Air Basin which is a non - attainment area for selective pollutants. Air pollution is a regional problem. Pollution levels in Baldwin Park are a result of not only local emissions, but also of those throughout the region. 111(b). No Impact. The project will not result in a cumulative net increase of pollutants for which the region is in non - attainment. 111(c). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the region is in non - attainment. The Southern California Association of Governments and the South Coast Air Quality Management District have adopted a South Coast Air Quality Management Plan ( SCAQMP). The proposed project is consistent with that plan and will not have a significant impact upon air quality. However, there will be temporary increases in air pollutant emissions during the construction phase. Construction dust and air pollution, however, will be reduced with the following procedures. Procedures to reduce air pollution include the following: 1) That the applicant adhere to the SCAQMD Rule 403 insuring the clean up construction related dirt on approach routes to the site. 2) The watering techniques shall be employed to partially mitigate the impact of construction generated dust particles. 3) Maintenance and servicing of construction equipment to minimize exhaust emissions. 4) Halting of construction activities during Stage 1 and Stage 2 smog alerts. 111(d). No Impact. The proposed project will not expose any nearby sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. III(e). No Impact. The proposed project will not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: IV(a). No Impact. The project will not have any effect on any species identified by the California Department of Fish and Game or the US Fish and Wildlife Service. IV(b). No Impact. The project will not have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in any local or regional plans, policies regulations or by the California Department of Fish and game or by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. IV(c). No Impact. The project will not have a substantial effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. There are no federally protected wetlands within the City of Baldwin Park. IV(d). No Impact. The project will not interfere with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites as the City of Baldwin Park is within an urbanized area and not within five (5) miles of a wildlife corridor. IV(e). No Impact. The proposed project does not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, as the City of Baldwin Park does not have any ordinances protecting trees, wildlife, etc... IV(f). No Impact. The project proposal will not conflict with any provisions of an adopted habitat conservation plan, natural community conservation plan or any local, regional or state habitat conservation plan, as the City's General plan does not indicate any of the referenced plans which could be affected by the project proposal. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than IV BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project. a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive or special status species in local or ® ® ❑ regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. C) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation Ian? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: IV(a). No Impact. The project will not have any effect on any species identified by the California Department of Fish and Game or the US Fish and Wildlife Service. IV(b). No Impact. The project will not have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in any local or regional plans, policies regulations or by the California Department of Fish and game or by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. IV(c). No Impact. The project will not have a substantial effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. There are no federally protected wetlands within the City of Baldwin Park. IV(d). No Impact. The project will not interfere with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites as the City of Baldwin Park is within an urbanized area and not within five (5) miles of a wildlife corridor. IV(e). No Impact. The proposed project does not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, as the City of Baldwin Park does not have any ordinances protecting trees, wildlife, etc... IV(f). No Impact. The project proposal will not conflict with any provisions of an adopted habitat conservation plan, natural community conservation plan or any local, regional or state habitat conservation plan, as the City's General plan does not indicate any of the referenced plans which could be affected by the project proposal. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: V(a). No Impact. The project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. V(b). No Impact. The project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource. V(c). No Impact. The project will not directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or geological feature: V(d). No Impact. The project is not expected to disturb any human remains. The City of Baldwin Park does not have any cemeteries. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than V CULTURAL RESOURCES Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: El a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical adverse resource as defined in Section 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? C) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geological feature? issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside formal of cemeteries? substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Explanation of Checklist Judgements: V(a). No Impact. The project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. V(b). No Impact. The project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource. V(c). No Impact. The project will not directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or geological feature: V(d). No Impact. The project is not expected to disturb any human remains. The City of Baldwin Park does not have any cemeteries. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than VI GEOLOGY AND SOILS Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic - related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? C) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on or offsite landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 -1 -B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risk to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Explanation mf Checklist Judgements: V|(d. No |nnoaot. The proposed project will not expose people Or structures to potential substantial adverse effects involving the rupture ofa known earthquake fault. According to ` the City's General p/8D' there are no active faults within the {}ih/ of Baldwin P8rh, therefore no A/qu/at'Prioio Special Study Zones are within the City. Although there are no active hyu|ta within the Qty of Baldwin Park, there are several major feu|hy surrounding the City, which have the p0t8nU8/ for causing major damage; however, the occurrence of direct ground rupture is not likely according to the City's General Plan. Potential for this type of activity is similar throughout Southern California and no unique or unusual risk ie posed by the proposed project. According to the Seismic Hazard Zones Map dated 3/99 from the Gb\tg Department of . Geology and Mines, the project are8ionotvvithin8|iquefeohonzona. V|(b)' No Impact. The City is located in a relatively flat urbanized area with avery low potential for wind and water erosion of soils. VKc\' No |nnp8ot. The City is not located on u geological unit orsoil that is unstable and could result in landslide, spreading liquefaction or collapse according to the Seismic Hazards Zone ' Map dated March 25, 10S9 from the State geologists Office. V|(d)` No Impact. The City and the project anyu8na|ooatedonovery|ovv-to-|nvvexpuneivesoi|8a defined in Table 18-1-B of the UAC U987\. Therefore the project will ncdoreat8 any risk to ` life orproperty. V1Ae\ No Impact. The proposed project's location does have sewers available for the disposal of ` wastewater. Furthermore, the soils at the proposed location can adequately support the use of the sewers. Less han VII HAZARDS AND Potentially Significant Less Than HAZARDOUSMATERIALS Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous El El 0 b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident E] conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? C) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one- quarter mile of an existing or eroposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency El El evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: VII(a). No Impact. The project will not create a significant hazard to the public through the routine transport use or disposal of hazardous materials. It is not anticipated that there will be any hazardous materials associated with the proposed project. VII(b). No Impact. There will be no significant hazard to the public or the environment regarding the upset or release of hazardous materials into the environment. VII(c). No Impact. The project will not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous material, substances or waste within one- quarter of an existing school. VII(d). No Impact. The proposed project is not located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous materials sites. VII(e) No Impact. The project is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public airport, and therefore would not create a hazard to people residing or working in the area: VII(f). No Impact. Since the project is not within the vicinity of a private airstrip, the project would not create a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area. VII(g). No Impact. According to the City's Emergency Operations Coordinator, the project proposal will not impair implementation or physically interfere with the City's adopted emergency plan or emergency evacuation plan. VII(h). No Impact. The project proposal is within a highly 'urbanized area and will therefore not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires. Less Than VI11 HYDROLOGY AND ii1/ATER Potentially Significant Less Than QUALITY Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? C) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in El El 11 substantial erosion or siltation on or offsite? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount El of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on or offsite? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage El 0 systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: VIII(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements, as the facility will generate minimal amounts of solid waste typical for this particular residential use. In addition, the applicant will be required to implement the requirements of the National Pollution Elimination Discharge System (NPDES), which regulates water quality runoff. VIII(b). No Impact. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies or interfere with groundwater recharge. VIII(c). No Impact. The proposed project will not substantially alter the course of an adjacent stream or river, which would result in erosion, or siltation of the site as there is no stream or river running through the City, which the exception of the channelized San Gabriel River. VIII(d)_ No Impact. The proposed project will not substantially alter the drainage patterns of the City and will not alter the course of a stream or river, as there are no streams or rivers in the City with the exception of the channelized San Gabriel River. VIII(e). No Impact. The proposed project will not create or contribute run -off, which would exceed the capacity of the existing storm drain system. Nor will the proposed project provide any polluted run -off. VIII(f). No Impact. The project will not degrade the existing water quality because of the limited amount of impervious surfaces associated with the project. VIII(g). No Impact. The project proposal will not place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area. Furthermore, the City is not within a Flood Zone. Federal Emergency Management Association (FEMA) has the City of Baldwin Park classified as Zone C- 060100. VIII(h). No Impact. The proposal is not within a 100 -year flood hazard area. FEMA has classified the City of Baldwin Park as Zone C- 060100. Vlll(i). No Impact. The project proposal will not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss involving flooding as a direct result of the failure of a levee or dam. Although the Santa Fe dam is located directly adjacent to the City across Arrow Highway, large -scale flooding as a result of failure of this particular dam is negligible due to the design of the dam in that water is present in the dam only a few months of the year. VIII(j). No Impact. Since Baldwin Park is an inland City, it could not experience a tsunami and the few bodies of water in Baldwin Park are small enough that they would not be able to produce a seiche large enough to cause any damage. Furthermore, Baldwin Park is an urbanized Less Than V111 HYDROLOGY AND WATER Potentially Significant Less Than QUALITY Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: VIII(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements, as the facility will generate minimal amounts of solid waste typical for this particular residential use. In addition, the applicant will be required to implement the requirements of the National Pollution Elimination Discharge System (NPDES), which regulates water quality runoff. VIII(b). No Impact. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies or interfere with groundwater recharge. VIII(c). No Impact. The proposed project will not substantially alter the course of an adjacent stream or river, which would result in erosion, or siltation of the site as there is no stream or river running through the City, which the exception of the channelized San Gabriel River. VIII(d)_ No Impact. The proposed project will not substantially alter the drainage patterns of the City and will not alter the course of a stream or river, as there are no streams or rivers in the City with the exception of the channelized San Gabriel River. VIII(e). No Impact. The proposed project will not create or contribute run -off, which would exceed the capacity of the existing storm drain system. Nor will the proposed project provide any polluted run -off. VIII(f). No Impact. The project will not degrade the existing water quality because of the limited amount of impervious surfaces associated with the project. VIII(g). No Impact. The project proposal will not place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area. Furthermore, the City is not within a Flood Zone. Federal Emergency Management Association (FEMA) has the City of Baldwin Park classified as Zone C- 060100. VIII(h). No Impact. The proposal is not within a 100 -year flood hazard area. FEMA has classified the City of Baldwin Park as Zone C- 060100. Vlll(i). No Impact. The project proposal will not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss involving flooding as a direct result of the failure of a levee or dam. Although the Santa Fe dam is located directly adjacent to the City across Arrow Highway, large -scale flooding as a result of failure of this particular dam is negligible due to the design of the dam in that water is present in the dam only a few months of the year. VIII(j). No Impact. Since Baldwin Park is an inland City, it could not experience a tsunami and the few bodies of water in Baldwin Park are small enough that they would not be able to produce a seiche large enough to cause any damage. Furthermore, Baldwin Park is an urbanized City with no hillsides to speak of and therefore, damage caused by mudflow would be negligible. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: IX(a). No Impact. The proposed Zone Change and General Plan Amendment will not physically divide an established community but will increase the allowable density previously allowed in the single - family residential zone. The maximum permitted density for the current single- family zoning is 0 to 8.7 du /ac. The maximum permitted density for the newly created multi - family zoning will be 12.1 to 20 du /ac. This increase in density will allow for the construction of a twelve (12) unit residential planned development provided that the development meets all standards and criteria set forth in the City's Zoning Code and Design Guidelines for a residential planned development. IX(b). ` No Impact. The proposed project, if approved, will not be in conflict with any land use plan, policy or regulation of an agency that has jurisdiction over the project adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. Thus, not creating any conflict with the land use map (proposed to be amended) if the request is approved. IX(c). No Impact. Currently the City has no habitat conservation plans or natural community conservation plans which would possible be affected by the proposed project. Less Than Less Than Potentially Significant Potentially Significant Less Than Significant IX LAND USE AND PLANNING Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Would the project: El Incorporation El Would the project: of the State? El 11 a) Physically divide an established community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or Ian, specific plan, or other land use Ian? regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? El C) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: IX(a). No Impact. The proposed Zone Change and General Plan Amendment will not physically divide an established community but will increase the allowable density previously allowed in the single - family residential zone. The maximum permitted density for the current single- family zoning is 0 to 8.7 du /ac. The maximum permitted density for the newly created multi - family zoning will be 12.1 to 20 du /ac. This increase in density will allow for the construction of a twelve (12) unit residential planned development provided that the development meets all standards and criteria set forth in the City's Zoning Code and Design Guidelines for a residential planned development. IX(b). ` No Impact. The proposed project, if approved, will not be in conflict with any land use plan, policy or regulation of an agency that has jurisdiction over the project adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. Thus, not creating any conflict with the land use map (proposed to be amended) if the request is approved. IX(c). No Impact. Currently the City has no habitat conservation plans or natural community conservation plans which would possible be affected by the proposed project. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: X(a). No Impact. The project will not result in the loss of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region or the residents of the State. There are no known mineral resources located within the City of Baldwin Park according to the City's General Plan. X(b). No Impact. The project will not result in the loss of a locally important mineral resource recovery site, as the City's General Plan does not indicate any known mineral resources. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than X MINERAL RESOURCES Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: El 11 El a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general Ian, specific plan, or other land use Ian? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: X(a). No Impact. The project will not result in the loss of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region or the residents of the State. There are no known mineral resources located within the City of Baldwin Park according to the City's General Plan. X(b). No Impact. The project will not result in the loss of a locally important mineral resource recovery site, as the City's General Plan does not indicate any known mineral resources. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XI(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not result in the exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the City's General Plan, noise ordinance or applicable standards of other agencies. Should the project be approved, noise levels would increase temporarily during the construction phase of the project. Construction is regulated by the City and is addressed in the Municipal Code to limit overall noise levels to an acceptable range. Increased population and development will result in increasing noise from a variety of sources commonly found in an urban environment (human activities, mechanical equipment, automobiles, pets, etc.). This increase is considered to be less than significant. XI(b). No Impact. The project will not result in the exposure of persons to generation of excess ground borne vibration or ground borne noise Levels. XI(c). No Impact. The project will not result in a substantial permanent increase of ambient noise levels. XI(d). No Impact. The project will not result in a substantial or periodic increase in ambient noise levels above levels that exist. XI(e). No Impact. The City of Baldwin Park is not located within an airport land use plan not within two miles of an airport. Therefore, the amendment will not expose people to excessive noise levels XI(f). No Impact. The City of Baldwin Park is not within the vicinity of a private airstrip. Therefore, the amendment will not expose people to excessive noise levels. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than XI NOISE Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? El C) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? El 11 d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XI(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not result in the exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the City's General Plan, noise ordinance or applicable standards of other agencies. Should the project be approved, noise levels would increase temporarily during the construction phase of the project. Construction is regulated by the City and is addressed in the Municipal Code to limit overall noise levels to an acceptable range. Increased population and development will result in increasing noise from a variety of sources commonly found in an urban environment (human activities, mechanical equipment, automobiles, pets, etc.). This increase is considered to be less than significant. XI(b). No Impact. The project will not result in the exposure of persons to generation of excess ground borne vibration or ground borne noise Levels. XI(c). No Impact. The project will not result in a substantial permanent increase of ambient noise levels. XI(d). No Impact. The project will not result in a substantial or periodic increase in ambient noise levels above levels that exist. XI(e). No Impact. The City of Baldwin Park is not located within an airport land use plan not within two miles of an airport. Therefore, the amendment will not expose people to excessive noise levels XI(f). No Impact. The City of Baldwin Park is not within the vicinity of a private airstrip. Therefore, the amendment will not expose people to excessive noise levels. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XII(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The provision of twelve (12) residential units will increase the population of the area, which will result in higher levels of traffic and increased demands on municipal agencies. The increase in population will create a less than significant impact. According to the Population and Housing Estimates for Individual Counties from the Department of Finance, an increase would be expected to occur with an average of 4.636 persons per dwelling, which creates an approximate increase of fifty -six (56) persons. The potential result of increased manpower and equipment needed to serve citywide demands are evaluated annually. The provision of twelve (12) residential units is considered less than a significant impact. The zone change will not increase the population by 56 people but rather is only a net increase of twenty -three (23) persons (5 units) based on the thirty -three (33) persons (7 -R -1 units) allowed under the R -1, Single - Family Zoning. XII(b). No Impact. The proposed project will not displace any existing housing _units that will necessitate the replacement or construction of residential units. XII(c). No Impact. The proposed project will not displace substantial number of individuals /families necessitating the construction of replacement housing. Less Than Less Than Potentially Significant Potentially Significant Less Than Significant XII POPULATION AND HOUSING Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Would the project: result in substantial adverse physical impacts Incorporation Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable roads or other infrastructure)? service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing any of the public services? elsewhere? ® ® El a) Fire protection? C) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the housing C) Schools? construction of replacement elsewhere? e) Other public facilities? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XII(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The provision of twelve (12) residential units will increase the population of the area, which will result in higher levels of traffic and increased demands on municipal agencies. The increase in population will create a less than significant impact. According to the Population and Housing Estimates for Individual Counties from the Department of Finance, an increase would be expected to occur with an average of 4.636 persons per dwelling, which creates an approximate increase of fifty -six (56) persons. The potential result of increased manpower and equipment needed to serve citywide demands are evaluated annually. The provision of twelve (12) residential units is considered less than a significant impact. The zone change will not increase the population by 56 people but rather is only a net increase of twenty -three (23) persons (5 units) based on the thirty -three (33) persons (7 -R -1 units) allowed under the R -1, Single - Family Zoning. XII(b). No Impact. The proposed project will not displace any existing housing _units that will necessitate the replacement or construction of residential units. XII(c). No Impact. The proposed project will not displace substantial number of individuals /families necessitating the construction of replacement housing. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XIII(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project should not result in the additional need for new or altered fire protection and will not alter acceptable service ratios or response times. The net increase of 23 persons is considered less than significant. Currently Station Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than XIII PUBLIC SERVICES Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services? ® ® ® ❑ a) Fire protection? b) Police protection? C) Schools? d) Parks? e) Other public facilities? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XIII(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project should not result in the additional need for new or altered fire protection and will not alter acceptable service ratios or response times. The net increase of 23 persons is considered less than significant. Currently Station 29 serves the City, which is located at Los Angeles Street and Maine Avenue. Whether or not the project would require additional police service or fire staff depends on the total requirements of the City and County. XIII(b). Less Than Significant Impact. Public services are already in place to serve this development. Although the project may result in some increase in police calls, the net increase of 23 persons is considered less than significant. XIII(c). Less Than Significant Impact. The net impact of the project on the school facilities will have less than a significant impact. There would be an increase in local school enrollment. However, the project would only result in,an estimated net increase in population of up to 23 persons with up to nine (9) school -aged children (40% of the total between the ages of 0- 20). School impact fees collected prior to occupancy are intended to offset any potential demand for new school facilities. School Development fees in the amount of $2.14/s.f. shall be paid to the Baldwin Park Unified School District prior to obtaining building permits. These fees are considered to provide full and complete school facilities. Therefore, the net increase of 23 persons and nine (9) school -aged children is considered less than significant. Xlll(d). Less Than Significant Impact. Although residential development for this proposed project will provide an estimated net increase of 23 persons and up to nine (9) school -aged children to the population, the project is not expected to significantly impact the City's existing parks or recreational facilities. The City's Development Tax collected prior to occupancy is intended to offset any potential demand for recreational facilities. Therefore, the estimated net increase of 23 persons and up to nine (9) school -aged children is considered less than significant. XIII(e). No Impact. The proposed project will not require the need for new or physically altered public facilities. • • • ••- XIV(a). No Impact. The proposed project is not expected to significantly impact the City's existing parks or recreational facilities. XIV(b). No Impact. The proposed project does not require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. Less Than Less Than Potentially Significant Potentially Significant Less Than Significant XIV RECREATION Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Would the project: Incorporation a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in relation a) Would the project increase the use of existing El 0 11 vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational congestion at intersections)? facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? • • • ••- XIV(a). No Impact. The proposed project is not expected to significantly impact the City's existing parks or recreational facilities. XIV(b). No Impact. The proposed project does not require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than XV TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of El 0 11 vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of ❑ service standard established by the county congestion ❑ management agency for designated roads or highways? C) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an ❑ increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results ❑ in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ❑ (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or ❑ incom atible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ XV(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will result in an estimated increase in traffic generated by the net gain of 5 residential units, which will be less than a significant impact. According to the Trip Generation Handbook by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (5th ed.) each dwelling unit will generate approximately 9.55 trip ends per dwelling unit on a weekday, 10.19 trip ends on Saturday, 8.78 trip ends on Sunday with an average of about 9.5 trip ends per day. According to the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan, continued development in Baldwin Park consistent with land use policy will create additional vehicle trips over the long term. To identify how new trips will place increasing demands on the City's constrained roadway system, estimates were made on long term growth both in Baldwin Park as well as surrounding communities, since nonresidents travel through Baldwin Park to reach other destinations. This analysis revealed that absent any improvements to the local roadway system, the City could be expected to experience declines in service levels on may local streets, meaning increased congestion and delays. Dalewood Street north of Judith Street (directly adjacent to the proposed development) is an area identified as a particular concern. This analysis identifies a need for the City to continuously and - closely monitor conditions over time and to make adjustments to the circulation system incrementally. The net gain of 5 residential units at this location is not substantial and thus will not require large -scale physical improvements. Approval of the proposed project shall be contingent upon provision of an assessment by a certified Traffic Engineer, of access road(s) to the subject properties. Traffic conditions shall be analyzed for the opening year. Occupancy permits shall be issued upon approval of sufficient and effective circulation at entry and exit points. In conjunction with the aforementioned assessments a warrant assessment shall be conducted to evaluate any potential installation of stop signs or traffic signal at the proposed entry /exit points. The developer shall implement, prepare submittals and pay for all costs /fees related to the Traffic Engineer's recommendations. XV(b). No Impact. The proposal will not exceed a level of service standard established by the County Congestion Management Agency for designated roads or highways. XV(c). No Impact. The proposal will not result in a change or increase in air traffic patterns or levels that result in substantial safety risks. XV(d). No Impact. The proposal will not increase hazards due to a design feature or incompatible uses, as the project does not include new construction of streets. XV(e). No Impact. The project will not result in inadequate emergency access. XVUl. No |nopaoL The proposed project will nut have an impact on existing parking fao/dkeo or create need for new parking 8S the site meets the required parking standards contained within the Municipal Code. Private parking areas contained within the required two oar garages will be provided for each dwelling unit es well ea guest parking. XVkA. No |nop8oL The proposed project wiU not conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation. regu -, ons re ate LO SO d waste i o���h���|��Jm� � � Explanation XV|(a). NO Impact. The proposed project will not exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. � XV| (b).No |rnpaoL The proposed project will not require the construction of new � vvab*r or wastewater treatment facilities or the expansion of existing facilities. ' XV| No |nnp@o1 The project site ia not within afkood zone area. The increase in impervious � surfaces primarily due to the proposed street will marginally increase runoff from the project area. The project will be required to provide satisfactory drainage to available storm drains. XV|(d).No Impact. The project will not affect existing water supplies provided to the City.. XV!(e).No Impact. The proposed amendment does not involve o project that will result in a determination by the watershed treatment provider that it has adequate capacity to serve 8 demand. XVKf). Less Than Significant Impact. Ag8in in 12 residential units will increase the demand for solid vvaaba disposal; however, the level of solid waste generation is onno|| in comparison to b}t8| solid waste disposal on 8 regional |av8|. The City in an effort to reduce the amount of solid waste disposed, currently provides recycling containers to residents for the recycling of paper, glass, plastic and aluminum. yV8Ste Management, the City waste hauler utilizes the Puente Hills landfill which has enough permitted capacity to accommodate the proposed project's waste disposal needs. Less Than XVI UTILITIES AND SERVICE Potentially Significant Less Than SYSTEMS Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? C) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has F-1 adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? El 1:1 N n f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regu -, ons re ate LO SO d waste i o���h���|��Jm� � � Explanation XV|(a). NO Impact. The proposed project will not exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. � XV| (b).No |rnpaoL The proposed project will not require the construction of new � vvab*r or wastewater treatment facilities or the expansion of existing facilities. ' XV| No |nnp@o1 The project site ia not within afkood zone area. The increase in impervious � surfaces primarily due to the proposed street will marginally increase runoff from the project area. The project will be required to provide satisfactory drainage to available storm drains. XV|(d).No Impact. The project will not affect existing water supplies provided to the City.. XV!(e).No Impact. The proposed amendment does not involve o project that will result in a determination by the watershed treatment provider that it has adequate capacity to serve 8 demand. XVKf). Less Than Significant Impact. Ag8in in 12 residential units will increase the demand for solid vvaaba disposal; however, the level of solid waste generation is onno|| in comparison to b}t8| solid waste disposal on 8 regional |av8|. The City in an effort to reduce the amount of solid waste disposed, currently provides recycling containers to residents for the recycling of paper, glass, plastic and aluminum. yV8Ste Management, the City waste hauler utilizes the Puente Hills landfill which has enough permitted capacity to accommodate the proposed project's waste disposal needs. XVI(g). No Impact. The proposed project will comply with all federal, state and local statutes relating to solid waste. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XVII(a). No Impact. The proposed project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of major periods of California history or prehistory. XVII(b). No Impact. The project does not have impacts that are individually limited but cumulatively considerable. A majority of the environmental factors analyzed within this initial study will not have an impact by the proposed project. XVII(c). No Impact. The project does not create environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. Less Than V11 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF Potentially Significant Less Than SIGNIFICANCE Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Does the project: a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or El ED 11 animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ( "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future erojects . El 0 G) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XVII(a). No Impact. The proposed project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of major periods of California history or prehistory. XVII(b). No Impact. The project does not have impacts that are individually limited but cumulatively considerable. A majority of the environmental factors analyzed within this initial study will not have an impact by the proposed project. XVII(c). No Impact. The project does not create environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. w D.C. Corporation ` FOR CITY USE ONLY: File No.: Fee: Received by: Date: F /Planning/Forms/l.andapp CITY OF BALD WIN PARK ® PLANNING DIVISION 14403 E. PACIFIC AVE Be BALD WIN PARK, CA 91TO6 (626) 913 -5261 BALD N P - A- R- K TYPE OF APPLICATIDN ' X- ZGne Variance General Plan Amendment Zone Change A�-� Conditional Use Permit Code Amendment j Adrninistrainre Adjustment _ _ Developrnent Plan — Specific Plan CRA Conceptual Approval ____ Other APPLICATION C Oration I Narne of t(® 2149 EGarvey North Address sate A-12 P No. Owner(s) of R s PROPEMYWORMAWN L Res Assessor Parcel Ida s) Tract and Lot Nu s) ko` 3`§ ks Existing Geneiral Plan Designation R-1 E)dsWV Zoning for each parcel %�- Existing Land Use amended Purpose of request CERTIFICATION STATEMENT: Vwe acknowtedge the filing of this application and cerffy that all the above information is tnm and a=rat8 and that Vwe have ftT&Med my es with the ant Pvasm of the Baldwm Park PlannftV (Nofi�a�acting as agent of the owner of record must cornplete and have notarized the (-=i tbached ftorpylAgal •) w D.C. Corporation ` FOR CITY USE ONLY: File No.: Fee: Received by: Date: F /Planning/Forms/l.andapp NOWNHWUNDUM �VMVN 14 -2:1 k9MJ_aC0YA Wer= 1. The zone change from 0-1, Office Industrial to R-3(PD) Multi-Family Residential Planned Development will benefit the adjoining neighborhood by removing a blighted home and developing a vacant lot. This development can be expected to increase property values for the surrounding properties and increase tax revenues for the City. 2. The use under the current zoning, Office Industrial is inconsistent with the General Plan designation of Single-Family Residential. The property involved in the proposed change is more suited for the zone requested because the surrounding area is primarily single-family detached homes and the proposed change will enable the construction of single-family detached homes. 3. The uses permitted by the proposed zone would not be detrimental to surrounding properties. The proposed project can be expected to increase property values for surrounding properties and generate tax revenues for the City. 4. There are no deed restrictions which affect development of the property. DC Corporation is requesting a Zonb Variance to allow less than the minimum required guest parking stalls for a planned development. 1. There are two extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property which do not generally apply to other properties in a R-3 (PD) zone and they both relate to CALTRANS. CALTRANS has requested that 12,348 square feet of the Site not be developed at this time so that CALTRANS may take this land in the future for expansion of the 10 Freeway. Additionally, CALTRANS has request an additional 8,315 sq, ft for use during the future construction. The loss of 35% of the gross site to CALTRANS has significantly impacted our ability to provide guest parking. 2. The requested variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property similarly situated, but which is denied to the property in question because of the CALTRANS requests. 3. The granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the adjacent properties because on-site and off-site parking is adequatq to meet normal demands. 4. The granting of the variance will not adversely affect the Gener, I f-*`,a a ;. City of Baldwin Park. JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT FRAZIER PROJECT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 1. DC Corporation is requesting a General Plan Amendment changing the General Plan designation from Single - Family Residential to Multi - Family Residential in order to eliminate blight, increase property values for surrounding properties and change an underperforming property into a revenue generating property for the City. DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1. DC Corporation is requesting a Development Plan in order to eliminate blight, increase property values for surrounding properties and change an underperforming property into a revenue generating property for the City. AriA Q A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DENYING REQUESTS FOR (1) AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT TO REDESIGNATE PROPERTY FROM SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, (2) A ZONE CHANGE FROM 01, OFFICE INDUSTRIAL TO R-3(PD), MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, (3) A DEVELOPMENT PLAN ALLOWING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TWELVE (12) UNIT SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND COMMON LOT, (4) A ZONE VARIANCE TO ALLOW LESS THAN THE MINIMUM REQUIRED PARKING SPACES FOR A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, AND (5) A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO SUBDIVIDE TWO LOTS INTO SIX LOTS FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES (APPLICANT: CORPORATION; CASE NO.: AGP-109, Z-544, ZV-696, DR-29 and TM-61346; LOCATION: 819 FRAZIER STREET) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby find, determine, and declare as follows: a) That an application ("Application") for a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Zone Variance, Development Plan and Tentative Tract Map was submitted on behalf of the owners of certain real property, located at 819 Frazier Street in the City of Baldwin Park (the "Property"), described more particularly in the Application on file with the Planning Division; and b) That the Application is requesting the required legislative and administrative approvals necessary to allow the construction of a twelve (12) unit Single-Family Detached Planned Development on the Property; and c) That on December 16, 2004, a duly noticed public hearing was held on the Application by the Planning Commission, at the conclusion of which the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council deny the Application; and • That on February 2, 2005, a duly noticed public hearing was held • the Application • the City Council; and e) That each fact set forth in the staff report presented to the City Council on February 2, 2005, is true and correct and accepted as a fact by the City Council. Resolution 2005-006 Page 2 SECTION 2. Based upon information provided, including but not limited to the Negative Declaration, the staff report presented to the City Council regarding the Application, and the testimony received at the hearing, the City Council hereby finds and determines: a. That the amendment to the General Plan and the change of zone sought in the Application would be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare; and b. That the findings required for approval of the Development Plan cannot be made since the density proposed exceeds that permitted by the General Plan and consistent zoning regulations, and required off-street parking is not provided; C. That the findings required for approval of the variance cannot be made since the Property is flat and there are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the Property involved or the intended use of such Property which do not generally apply to other single-family zoned property, a variance is not necessary for the preservation or enjoyment of a substantial property right, the granting of the requested variance would be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the adjacent properties in that it would place the developer's parking obligations on the public, and the granting of the variance would adversely affect the General Plan by promoting density not permitted therein; d. That the findings required for approval of the Tentative Tract Map cannot be made, as the Project is inconsistent with the General Plan and zoning which would be consistent with the General Plan, SECTION 3. Based upon the findings set forth above, and its legislative discretion, the City Council hereby finds and determines that the Application shall be denied. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and forward a copy hereof to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and the Applicant. PASSED AND APPROVED this 2nd day of February 2005. s ffl�,* ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SS. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK Resolution 2005 -006 Page 3 I, ROSEMARY RAMIREZ, Chief Deputy City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park at a regular meeting of the City Council on February 2, 2005, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ROSEMARY RAMIREZ, CIVIC CHIEF DEPUTY CITY CLERK �W I U.61 ,SUBJECT: FEB "ORT PURPOSE This report discusses City Council consideration of a request for: 1 An Amendment to the City's General Plan Land Use Element to redesignate the subject property from Single-Family Residential to Multi-Family Residential; and 2) A Zone Change from R-1, Single-Family Residential to R-3, Multi- Family Residential; and 3) A Specific Plan with included Development Plan criteria to allow the construction of a nineteen (19) unit single-family detached residential development; and 4) A Tentative Tract Map to subdivide five (5) lots into nineteen (19) lots for residential purposes. This report recommends that the City Council deny the requests, consistent with the Planning Commission's recommendations for denial. CEQAINOTICING A Notice of Public Hearing was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the subject properties on December 30, 2004. The Planning Division has completed an environmental analysis, and has determined that the project will not have a significant impact upon the environment. Pursuant to that I AGP-1 10, Z-545, SP 04-01, DR-30 and TM-61345 February 2, 2005 Paae 2 information, a Draft Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact has been prepared pending approval by the City Council. : — a, The subject property has a current General Plan Land Use designation of Single-Family Residential and is consistently zoned R-1, Single-Family. The property is irregular in shape and contains approximately 66,528 square feet (1.53 acres) of net area. The total site area is essentially flat and contains two existing single-family residences, one of which will be retained in a newly created lot and the other of which will eventually be demolished. The adiacent zoning and land uses are listed in the table below. FAr PM Adjacent Property Location Zoning Property Use North R-1 Single-Family Residence South R-1 Single-Family Residence East R-1 Single-Family Residences West R-i Single-Family Residences DISCUSSION GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT IZONE CHANGE The General Plan Amendment and Zone Change are prerequisites to the preparation of the subject property for the proposed construction of a nineteen (19) unit single-family detached residential development because the existing density under the General Plan and consistent zoning would permit only thirteen (13) units on the property. In order for the development to take place, both the General Plan designation and zoning of the property will need to be changed to Multi Family Residential use designations as those designations would permit the density required to develop nineteen (19) units on this sized parcel. This zone change will create a situation that is called "spot zoning", in that a small area of land will be zoned in a manner incompatible with the immediate single-family zoned neighborhood surrounding it. These neighborhoods are fully built out with well- maintained housing developed at densities consistent with their Single Family Residential General Plan and zoning designations. Spot zoning has been held to be illegal when the City Council acts "unreasonably or without substantial evidence" because no public benefit exists for the classification. Because the increased density provides no public benefit, but only a private benefit to the property developer, and the street width proposed to achieve the requested density will be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare, staff is of the opinion that General Plan amendment and zoning request should be denied. AG P- 110, Z-545, SP 04-01, DR-30 and TM-61345 February 2, 2005 Pacie 3 In addition to the change in zoning, the applicant is requesting approval of a Specific Plan, which includes maps and other specific criteria in a Development Plan. According to California Government Code Section 65454, no Specific Plan may be adopted or amended unless the proposed plan is consistent with the General Plan. A Specific Plan allows for flexible development standards to encourage and achieve innovative developments exhibiting a superior architecture and site design quality. Where such a plan has been approved, inconsistent development standards of the underlying zone shall be excluded and superceded by the conditions and standards of the Plan. Specific Plans must, however, be compatible with and enhance the surrounding neighborhood. Because the density proposed for this project significantly exceeds that of the surrounding neighborhood and the design of the project results in substandard street widths, this project does not accomplish the objectives of the Specific Plan Further, aside from the increased density, this particular request as it is proposed does not complement nor does it enhance the surrounding neighborhood for the following reasons: - A portion of the development is utilizing a previously dedicated portion of Kenmore Ave., which the City owns for future street expansion purposes. The dedication was accepted anticipating the need for a wider street than presently is in place. The developer, however, is proposing a narrower street in order to use the land under that portion of Kenmore Ave. to obtain the density sought. (The applicant has requested the City to vacate those portions of the street to accomplish this. If this project is approved, that request will be brought back to the City Council in conformance with the requirements of State law). - The Kenmore Ave. extension proposed by the applicant does not complement the design and direction shown on the zoning map for the proposed street. Furthermore, it does not meet the Engineering Division's requirements (reference Exhibit "D"). - Proposed Lots 5, 6 and 7 are accessed from an easement, which was previously a single-family flag lot. According to the Subdivision Map Act, easements are no longer allowed as acceptable access for such lots and each lot is required to have its own driveway access. - If the public street extension is created as proposed by this project, property owners to the east of the street extension will have new opportunities to take advantage of the newly created street frontage, should they decide to split their lots for future residential developments, but this will have a negative circulation impact due to the substandard width (30') of the street, both for conflicts between drivers and pedestrians and the lack of potential on-street parking. - The proposed density and limited lot sizes are not well integrated with the surrounding neighborhood in that the immediate single-family area provides for lot sizes that well exceed the minimum required lot area. AGP-1 10, Z-545, SP 04-01, DR-30 and TM-61345 February 2, 2005 Pape 4 Mi The applicant is proposing to construct a nineteen (19) unit single-family detached housing development. According to the plans submitted to the Planning Division, six (6) of the homes will have access from Walnut Street with the other thirteen (13) homes having access from the newly proposed 30 foot wide public street extension of Kenmore Ave. Each residential unit will have its own enclosed private open space, ranging between 472 square feet and 1,263 square feet, which will be directly accessible from within that unit. The Specific Plan also proposes that the required guest parking be eliminated which would otherwise be required for a PD overlay. According to the floor plans and elevations, all residential units will be two-story with livable floor areas ranging from 1,636 square feet to 2,173 square feet (excluding the garages and balconies) and consist of four (4) bedrooms, 21/2 bathrooms and a two-car garage, with the exception of Plan T containing three (3) bathrooms. Lot #15 will retain an existing residence that will be modified to meet the development standards proposed by the Specific Plan. The table below provides detailed information on unit floor areas (including garages), private open space areas and lot sizes: Table 2 Unit Floor Areas and Open Space Lot Number Floor Area* Private Open Space Area Lot Size 1 2,497 sq.ft. 674 2,952 sq.ft. 2 2,497 sq.ft. 955 3,269 sq.ft. 3 2,066 sq.ft. 472 2,508 sq.ft. 4 2,497 sq.ft. 512 3,028 sq.ft. 5 2,636 sq.ft. 1,045 7,878 sq.ft. 6 2,636 sq.ft. 893 3,240 sq.ft. 7 2,636 sq.ft. 822 2,992 sq.ft. 8 2,636 sq.ft. 1,035 3,400 sq.ft. 9 2,066 sq.ft. 902 2,763 sq.ft. 10 2,636 sq.ft. 831 3,270 sq.ft. 11 2,066 sq.ft. 690 2,924 sq.ft. 12 2,066 sq.ft. 678 2,850 sq.ft. 13 2,066 sq.ft. 887 3,084 sq.ft. 14 2,066 sq.ft. 1,117 3,110 sq.ft. 15 Existing home 1,263 7,888 sq.ft. 16 2,414 sq.ft. 800 3,166 sq.ft. 17 2,414 sq.ft. 795 3,023 sq.ft. 18 2,066 sq.ft. 545 2,600 sq.ft. 19 2,066s 542 2,600 sq.ft. ' Includes garage square footage AGP-1 10, Z-545, SP 04-01, DR-30 and TM-61345 February 2, 2005 Paae 5 - Building Height and Architectural Design The applicant has proposed to employ different designs and materials that will provide variety and aesthetic interest throughout the project. The exterior elevations of the proposed homes will have a mix of classic Spanish Mediterranean style architectural design. Design elements include a mixture of stucco-finished elevations, faux shutters, wrought iron and decorative veneers. Roofing material will consist of concrete tile. Although there are only five different floor plans proposed, each of the proposed units has been designed to avoid a "monolithic" appearance. The exterior walls and rooflines are staggered along both the vertical and horizontal planes. The roof and wall variations, along with the subtle changes in colors, help to visually reduce the mass and bulk of the buildings. Varying materials are utilized along the front elevation to emphasize an appealing view from the common areas. The project will involve the construction of six (6) foot high block walls around the perimeter of each unit to enclose the private open space areas. Any walls that are visible from the public right-of-way will be decorative block with a cap. Wall material and any treatment shall be subject to Planning Division review and approval. TENTA T1 VE TRACT MAP — TM-62166 As a prerequisite for the proposed development, approval of a tentative tract map to subdivide five (5) lots into nineteen (19) lots for residential purposes is required. The Tentative Tract Map illustrates the nineteen (19) building footprints, respective lot sizes and a substandard street width and cul-de-sac. The City's Engineering staff is not able to recommend approval of the proposed street in that it does not provide the minimum standard requested width of fifty (50) feet (includes sidewalk and parkway) and cul-de-sac radius of 32'. Staff recommends that the project maintain the density at an R-1 level, which is consistent with the City's General Plan designation. The R-1 zoning designation would allow for a maximum of thirteen (13) dwelling units as opposed to the proposed eighteen (18) new units. If the density were maintained at the single-family residential (maximum of 8.7 dwelling units per acre) level it would have the following effects: i) Larger front yard areas (i.e. more privacy); ii) Wider and deeper rear yards (i.e. larger, more usable private open space areas) iii) Larger lot sizes iv) Wider and deeper lots v) Lower Floor Area Ratio vi) Less Site Coverage vii) More landscaping throughout the front yard areas AGP-1 10, Z-545, SP 04-01, DR-30 and TM-61345 February 2, 2005 Paqe 6 Approval of the Tract Map is possible only if the General Plan amendment, zoning amendment, and Specific Plan with included Development Plan are approved. K= At the December 16, 2004 Planning Commission Meeting, the Commission recommended that the City Council deny all requested entitlements for the proposed development. Some of the Commission concerns are as follows: - The direction and width of the new cul-de-sac street is inconsistent with the General Plan and does not complement the Zoning Map - Density is too high. - Limited amount of usable private open space. - Potential to create unsafe conditions. RECOMMENDATION Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council: FINDINGS OF FACT—TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 1 That the site for the proposed development is not physically suitable for the development of nineteen (19) single-family detached residential dwelling units unless an Amendment to the City's General Plan, a zone change to R-3, and a Specific Plan with included Development Plan criteria are approved; and 2. That the design of the subdivision will create a threat to the Health, Safety and Welfare of the citizens of Baldwin Park as the project proposes nineteen (19) single-family detached residential dwelling units on lot sizes which are not compatible with the surrounding large-lot single-family residential zoning AGP -110, Z -545, SP 04 -01, DR -30 and TM -61345 February 2, 2005 Page 7 designations and uses and utilizing a street width which can create problems for the public health, safety, and welfare; and 3. That the Tentative Tract Map is not consistent with the City of Baldwin Park's General Plan, in that the land use designation of the subject property is single - family residential, the requested General Plan amendment and zone change will not be in compliance or compatible with the remaining General Plan requirements; and 4. That development of the site in accordance with the Tentative Tract Map will not affect future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities for the area as the natural topography of the site is flat and the future development of nineteen (19) 2 -story dwelling units will therefore not affect said opportunities; and 5. That the proposed Tentative Map is in an area serviced by Valley County Water District and the District has indicated that the proposal will not violate any water quality standards for the Water District. If the City Council approves the General Plan amendment and zone change, the following Conditions of Approval are recommended. Staff will then return with a separate report to the Planning Commission requesting consideration of a Specific Plan and Development Plan. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1 That the subject Property shall be developed and maintained in substantial compliance with Exhibit "A ", dated January 19, 2005, except as modified herein by these conditions; and 2. - That electric garage door openers shall be provided for each unit; and 3. That sectional roll -up garage doors shall be provided for each unit; and 4. That all landscaped areas must be separated from vehicular areas by a 6 continuous concrete curb; and 5. That a decorative block wall shall be provided surrounding the property. Decorative block walls with brick cap will be required along all exterior property lines that are visible from the public right -of -way and the common driveway, proposed materials are subject to Planning Division approval. Interior property line delineator walls shall be precision block with a brick cap; and 6. Each of the homes shall be provided with decorative motion sensor lights at each garage and main level entrance door. Exterior lighting shall be decorative and automatically controlled. Manufacturer's literature shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval when plan are submitted to the Building Division for plan check; and AGP-1 10, Z-545, SP 04-01, DR-30 and TM-61345 February 2, 2005 Paae 8 7. Each unit shall be pre-wired for an alarm system; and 8. A detailed landscaping plan shall be provided indicating the size, location, and species of all trees, shrubs, ground cover, and any other plan life proposed. This plan shall be submitted during plan check phase; and 9. All Landscaping shall be automatically irrigated and a detailed irrigation plan shall be submitted during the plan check phase; and 10. That the applicant shall submit a copy of the proposed covenants, conditions and restrictions to the Planning Division prior to obtaining building permits. Said CC&Rs must be approved by the City Attorney for satisfaction with City requirements prior to issuance of such permits; and 11. That the CC&R's shall reflect that any future addition to individual units shall be limited to a patio cover which shall not exceed 25% of the rear yard area and shall meet all zoning code requirements; and 12. That all utilities shall be undergrounded. This includes utility connections to each individual unit, as well as along the frontage of the property along Frazier Street; and 13. Provide the following information upon the Plan Check submittal: A. Three (3) architectural plans and one (1) extra site plan for the Fire Department B. Three (3) complete sets of Plans for the City. C. Two sets of the following are required: i. Soil Reports ii. Structural Calculations iii. Title 24 Energy Calculations 14. All conditions of the State Map Subdivision Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance must be met prior to recordation; and 15. All conditions of the Los Angeles County Fire Department must be met prior to recordation. A written notification or approval plan from the Fire Department must be submitted to the City; and 16. All special assessments and utilities or sewer connection fees are to be paid prior to recording the final map; and 17. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including water, gas, electricity, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the respective utility companies' standards. Easements shall be provided as required; and AGP -110, Z -545, SP 04 -01, DR -30 and TM -61345 February 2, 2005 Page 9 18. Prior to recordation of the final map, a written certification from the Water District, GTE, SCE, SCG and Adelphia Cable stating that adequate facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed development shall be submitted to the City. The utility companies must issue such letter at least 30 days prior to final map approval; and 19. A title report/guarantee showing all fee owners and interest holders must be submitted when a final map is submitted for plan check. This account must remain open until the final map is filed with the County Recorder. An updated title report/guarantee must be submitted ten (10) working days prior to final map approval; and 20. The final map shall be based on a field survey; and 21. All surveying for the proposed development will be done by the developer, including the establishment of centerline ties; and 22. The surveyor's closure sheets must be enclosed with the final map; and 23. New boundary monuments must be set in accordance with City standards and subject to approval by the City Engineer; and 24. All easements existing prior to final map approval must be identified. If an easement is blanket or indeterminate in nature, a statement to that effect must be shown on the final map in lieu of its location; and 25. The following improvement plans, prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and drawn in accordance with the conditions of approval and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, must be submitted to the City's Engineering Division; a. Grading Plan b. Sewer Plan C. Street Plan d. Street Light Plan (per City Master Plan) 26. That the Developer shall submit a complete Hydrology study of the Project area and surrounding area affected by the development; and 27. That if the Los Angeles County Fire Department required additional hydrants or water pressure in addition to what already exists, or if the Los Angeles County Fire Department require a fire access road during construction, no building permits shall be issued by the City's Building Division (except demolition or grading permits) prior to written approval from the Los Angeles County Fire Department that either the conditions have been met or that the City may go ahead and issue building permits; and AGP -110, Z -545, SP 04 -01, DR -30 and TM -61345 February 2, 2005 Page 10 28. That no grading, building, demolition or construction permits shall be issued by the City prior to the applicant having ownership of the entire site; and final map approval; and 29. Submit to the office a Soils Report signed by a Registered Soils Engineer /Registered Civil Engineer; and 30. The following off -site improvements must be existing or guaranteed for: a) Construct new driveway approaches per plan. All driveway approaches shall meet ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) requirements. b) Plant one street tree for each unit on the proposed development project. c) All parcels must have separate and independent connections to the main sewer line. d) Install water services and gas services for the development area per water and gas company. e) Provide maps in digital format to the County of Los Angeles per County requirements. f) Provide hydraulic study and design and construct storm drain for the development area if necessary. g) Provide street lights for the proposed street per city master plan. h) Obtain 30 -foot wide strip of land from APN# 8546- 004 -059 on Kenmore Street for the construction of street "A ". 31 The developer shall submit to the City Engineer the total cost estimate for bonding purposes of all off -site improvements prior to approval of the final map; and 32. All existing and proposed structures shall meet current zoning code requirements; and 33. If the City accepts approval of the final map prior to the completion of all required public improvements, the developer shall enter into a subdivision agreement with the City and shall post the appropriate security; and 34. A copy of the final map reduced to 8 1/2 " x 11 ° shall be submitted to the Engineering Division prior to final tract map approval; and 35. Approval of this tentative map does not constitute approval of the site plan or building footprints; and 36. The City is being served by a cable TV franchise awarded to Adelphia Cable. All residential units constructed shall be prewired and made ready for cable TV connections; and AGP -110, Z -545, SP 04 -01, DR -30 and TM -61345 February 2, 2005 Page 11 37. After the final map records, a mylar and two blueline prints shall be submitted to the Engineering Division at no cost to the City. Final occupancy will not be granted until the recorded map is received by the Engineering Division; and 38. Provide a copy of the final map on a disc in PC format; and 39. The vacation of 30 foot wide street right -of -way must be approved by the City Council in accordance with the procedure required by law; and 40. The developer is required to obtain a General Construction Storm Water Activity Permit (GCASWP) from the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board; and 41. The developer is required to submit a Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board approved Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) copy to the Department of Public Works for review. The SWPPP must always be kept on site and must be made available for review by the City inspection staff and the State of California Regional Water Quality Control Board upon request; and 42. An Erosion Control Plan (ECP) must also be submitted to the Engineering Division for review and approval; and 43. A Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) must be submitted along with other project plans for City approval. The project plan shall contain requirements specified by the City based on a project Standard Urban Water Mitigation Plan Evaluation Form to be provided by the Engineering Division; and 44. The approval of the proposed project shall be contingent upon provision of an assessment by a certified Traffic Engineer, of access road(s) to the subject properties. Traffic conditions shall be analyzed for the opening year. Occupancy permits shall be issued upon approval of sufficient and effective circulation at entry and exit points. In conjunction with the aforementioned assessments a warrant assessment shall be conducted to evaluate for any potential installation of stop signs or traffic signal(s) at the proposed entry /exit points. The developer shall implement, prepare submittals and pay for all costs /fees rebated to the Traffic Engineer's recommendations; and 45. The final map must be recorded within 24 months or all proceedings shall be terminated. AGP -110, Z -545, SP 04 -01, DR -30 and TM -61345 February 2, 2005 Page 12 n- #1 - Exhibit "A" - Development Plan, dated February 2, 2005 #2 - Exhibit "B" - Existing Zoning and Land Use Designations #3 - Exhibit "C" - Proposed Zoning and Land Use Designation #4 - Exhibit "D" — Engineering Division's requirements for street expansion #5 - Environmental Data — Draft Negative Declaration and Initial Study #6 - Application Form and Statements #7 - Resolution 2005 -007 4 EL a a 00 i O:rr�a pp5a :R8 gg g R Rg Q z 3 m d g LL i MONEINM ®e z a H a Baca � b•i r i i I y� h� W Fi Fes„ ❑ °z� o I i 1 m� i R `� gt co ada 9 m - ' I - - i � -• i� � i � _ i• i i � J e is f i t 8 — CK N gN V W b2R� €i R 0101 Y Df t^ g y pp Z M i Q y ® a� p U) ® x f �� ` s �s € E LL Z 0 QZ �r i 0 V�E;E�Q� ��F3��e 5iagEE gdSa�d���Egg �� a A E.......az...... sE 4 € EdEt 6 z EkeQe a EE E �t s 13603 13607 13611 13615 1361 1362 136 4030 4045 , 31 4047 4052 4042 �� 4024 ELWYN DR - 4043 136 36 361 361 11 136 3601 36 361 361 3621 4040 4038 4038 4036 4037 coal m 4040 4027 4036 4023 4016 4018 4031 D 4028 4011 4025 4031 40 401 4027 ^ 4012 4021 35 13629 4027 �� 4005 m 137 �� 4015 4016 4016 4016 lj� 0 1 13?03 L13607 t13611 1 15 ,361 1362 1� gp47 4030 404 4042 4033 4024 4041 l ELN DR 4043 4027 4040 �7 13638 4039 4038 4023 4016 4018 4{131 4 036 III-1--mill 4 036 136 3630 4035 < 402B 4011 ]1402' 4031 40 401 40p �22 4012 21 136 136201 4027 4005 m 13637 4023 5 _ 4016 4016 4016 • ° . a V y \moo 0 0 0 o ne roo° 1LO p�a�ryp'q pa �N ti°j N (� h Off. P N ; —J4 N ui JW (2) J. V -1 W _j —J: .L V W LIT .y a * *qN i ' ^^ ^^ LL] (3) �� �• dN s d 09 r,r 0 _ o CC• /C/ ' a O O La N I- � c0 0 m � Em �M p6'/9 o e v m �o o r`ol ye — ., m N h N J f I ccr al �O — y a plroazo 1 V °. m n N\/ m r\j 58 U OB as 9B MM 0B 71 9B Ot/ O N 4 kD m 6BY!% min• _ O b 3 fj..i8 0 SZ/ z-d m` `z B dY'9l/ SW Sam— a t m 1 co LO co t ox — — — — — — — — — — — -- - - - - -- - -- Lij ' u o° I� o o _ S � ry m �, o/r ' �S+ W a i oo! /t •r9 09 o J h • ,p b n v O N b Orr i 09 OL D � 0Ti %F/ OE ' �) 0 ( m N ' _ __ o 0£ OL- i b'96 i -J— s —T SO/ -- O9J Uls, V16z ry j I f o/i o s5 ry __W 2'2 Yg !S'BL= - /6s6 c�v PNI I O N w n m m 09 — _. - - -- .. z I I W � i I � 08 L0£ Q m o Sq M c O W U O -. OL973 In ell DATE: December 1, 2004 APPLICANT: D.C. Corporation TYPE OF General Plan Amendment (AGP), Zone Change (Z), PERMIT: Development Plan (DR), Specific Plan (SP), and Tentative Tract Map (TM) FILE NO.: AGP -110, Z -545, DR -30, SP 04 -01 and TM -61345 LOCATION OF PROJECT: 3940 -3948 Walnut Street, Baldwin Park DESRIPTION OF PROJECT: A request for consideration of an amendment to the City's General Plan Land Use Element to redesignate the subject property from Single- family Residential to Multi - Family Residential, a zone change from R -1, Single - Family Residential to R -3, Multi - Family Residential, a development Plan and specific plan to allow the construction of a nineteen (19) unit single - family detached residential development and a tentative tract map to subdivide five (5) lots into nineteen (19) lots for residential purposes. It is the opinion of the ❑ Zoning Administrator ❑ Planning Commission ® City Council ❑ Other that, upon review of the project, it has determined that the project will not have a significant effect upon the environment. Mitigation Measures are attached RX are not required (Signature) Principal Planner (Title) Date(s) of Public Notice: x Legal advertisement— December 30, 2004 Posting of the properties x Written notice — December 30, 2004 (msw\fonm\negdec) 1197 � '_ • 1. Project Title: A request for approval of an amendment to the City's General Plan Land Use Element, to redesignate the subject property from Single - Family Residential to Multi - Family Residential and a zone change from R -1, Single - Family Residential to R -3, Multi - Family Residential. A Development Plan and a Specific Plan to allow the construction of a nineteen (19) unit single - family detached residential development. A related request is for approval of a tentative tract map to subdivide five (5) lots into nineteen (19) lots for residential purposes. 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Baldwin Park 14403 E. Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, CA 91706 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Salvador Lopez Jr., Assistant Planner (626) 813 -5261 4. Project Location: 3940 -3948 Walnut Street 5. Assessor's Parcel Number: 8546- 004 -078, 079, 107, 108 & 109 6. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: D. C. Corporation 2149 E. Garvey North, Suite A -12 West Covina, CA 91791 7. General Plan Designation: Single- Family Residential (current) Multi- Family Residential (proposed) . Zoning: R -1 (current) R- 3(proposed) with a Specific Plan overlay 9. Surrounding Lend LJmem Incorporated in 1956' the [|dv of Baldwin Park is located and Settings: approximately 17 miles east of downtown Los Angeles. The intersection of the 1-10 (San Bernardino) and 1-605 (San Gebha/ River) freeways lies near the southwest corner ofthis 6.8 square mile City. Although Baldwin Park is predominantly 8 residential bedroom oomnnuniiy, nBC8nt efhxhS have placed 8 greater emphasis on pn}noutiOg oonnnlen:ia| and industrial land uses. However, the City is near "bui|d-ouf', focusing efforts on the Redevelopment of |and, especially within u|Os8 proximity to the freeway. ` According to the 2000 [|onaua. Baldwin Park has approximately 75.900 persons. This is more than double the population in 1800. B3|Uvvin Park is predominantly 8 Hispanic working o|aaS community, although between the 1990 and 2000 Census has experienced a recent increase in its Asian population. Furthermore, the City has a considerably larger than average household size than the County average, suggesting increased pressure on the City's housing stock and the provision of services. ` ' ' ' ' ' ` ` ` ' ` ` ' ' ' ' ' ` ` ' ` ` ' ` ` ` City of Baldwin Park u►mR LLE M STA A 4040 4039 4039 4035 4037 City of Baldwin Park Recently, the Planning Division has received an application for a GpaCUOo Plan to develop 8 nineteen (19) unit single-family detached residential dev9/nprnard. Currently, the zoning and General Plan designation for the subject property is R-1' Single-Family Residential. In order for the development to take p|ocg. an Amendment to the City's General Plan and e zone change will be required to redesignate the property from single-family residential to multi-family residential. Additionally, 8 Specific Plan and Development Plan are required in order for this type of development tooccur. Project Characteristics: A request for approval of an amendment to the City's General Plan Land Use Element, to redesignate the subject property from Single-Family Residential to Multi-Family Residential and a zone change from R-1. Single-Family Residential to Fl-3' Multi-Family FleeidenUa|, pursuant to Sections 153.030 and 153.631 of the City's Municipal Code. A Development Plan and a Specific Plan to allow the construction of a nineteen (18) unit single-family detached residential development, pursuant to Section 153.271 of the City's Zoning Code. /\ related request is for approval of o tentative tract map to subdivide five (5} lots into nineteen (19) lots for residential puqpnama. pursuant to Section 152.07 of the City's Municipal Code. 11' Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement) No additional public approvals beyond Planning Commission and City Council will be required for this project. 12. References ' The following are also referenced where appropriate in the Environmental Checklist Form: a. General Plan b. Municipal Code ` C. _ Zoning Code d. Emergency Operations Coordinator e. Geological Map—Liquefaction Zones 1) A brief explanation is required for all onSwana' except "No Impact" anSvvoro that are adequately supported by the information sources lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply bJprojects like the one involved (e.g.' the project f8//S outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact' answer should be explained where it is based on project—specific factor as well as general St8OUendS (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based OO 8 project—specific screening analysis.) 2) All answers must take account ofthe whole action involved, including offsite as well as onaite. cumulative aS well 8Sp jeot{eve[indireutoSvveUaadireot.mndoonatruoUonoaweU ua operational impacts. , ' 8\ Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is pubenUu|k/ significant, /eaa than ` significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross - referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiring, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. C) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures, which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. - •' Explanation of Checklist Judgements: I(a). No Impact. The project will not have an adverse affect on a scenic vista or result in the obstruction of any scenic views. I(b). No Impact. This project will not result in the damage or destruction of scenic resources or historical buildings. I {c) I(d). No Impact. This project will not substantially degrade the existing visual character and quality of the site and its surroundings. Through the Design Review process, the project has been designed so as to ensure no aesthetic offensive site, building or mechanical equipment will be open to public view. No Impact. This project will not create any new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the residential zones. Less Than Less Than Potentially Significant Potentially Significant Less Than Significant I AESTHETICS Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Impact Mitigation Impact In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are Incorporation Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an within a state scenic highway? optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and C) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or farmland. Would the project: quality of the site and its surroundings? El El a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Explanation of Checklist Judgements: I(a). No Impact. The project will not have an adverse affect on a scenic vista or result in the obstruction of any scenic views. I(b). No Impact. This project will not result in the damage or destruction of scenic resources or historical buildings. I {c) I(d). No Impact. This project will not substantially degrade the existing visual character and quality of the site and its surroundings. Through the Design Review process, the project has been designed so as to ensure no aesthetic offensive site, building or mechanical equipment will be open to public view. No Impact. This project will not create any new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the residential zones. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: II(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not convert any type of farmland to a non - agricultural use. II(b). No Impact. The proposed project will not conflict with the zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than II AGRICULTURE RESOURCES Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? C) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of El Farmland, to non-agricultural use? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: II(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not convert any type of farmland to a non - agricultural use. II(b). No Impact. The proposed project will not conflict with the zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract. II(c). No Impact. The project will not result in the conversion of farm land to non - agricultural uses. III AIR QUALITY Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Less Than Significant No Impact Impact p Mitigation Impact Incorporation Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relief upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? C) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: III(a). No Impact. The proposed project does not conflict with any applicable air quality plan. The City of Baldwin Park is located within the South Coast Air Basin which is a non - attainment area for selective pollutants. Air pollution is a regional problem. Pollution levels in Baldwin Park are a result of not only local emissions, but also of those throughout the region. - III(b). No Impact. The project will not result in a cumulative net increase of pollutants for which the region is in non - attainment. III(c). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the region is in non - attainment. The Southern California Association of Governments and the South Coast Air Quality Management District have adopted a South Coast Air Quality Management Plan (SCAQMP). The proposed project is consistent with that plan and will not have a significant impact upon air quality. However, there will be temporary increases in air pollutant emissions during the construction phase. Construction dust and air pollution, however, will be reduced with the following procedures. Procedures to reduce air pollution include the following: 1) That the applicant adhere to the SCAQMD Rule 403 insuring the clean up construction related dirt on approach routes to the site. 2) The watering techniques shall be employed to partially mitigate the impact of construction generated dust particles. 3) Maintenance and servicing of construction equipment to minimize exhaust emissions. 4) Halting of construction activities during Stage 1 and Stage 2 smog alerts. Ili(d). No Impact. The proposed project will not expose any nearby sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. III(e). No Impact. The proposed project will not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: IV(a). No Impact. The project will not have any effect on any species identified by the California Department of Fish and Game or the US Fish and Wildlife Service. IV(b). No Impact. The project will not have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in any local or regional plans, policies regulations or by the California Department of Fish and game or by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. IV(c). No Impact. The project will not have a substantial effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. There are no federally protected wetlands within the City of Baldwin Park. IV(d). No Impact. The project will not interfere with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites as the City of Baldwin Park is within an urbanized area and not within five (5) miles of a wildlife corridor. IV(e). No Impact. The proposed project does not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, as the City of Baldwin Park does not have any ordinances protecting trees, wildlife, etc... IV(f). No Impact. The project proposal will not conflict with any provisions of an adopted habitat conservation plan, natural community conservation plan or any local, regional or state habitat conservation plan, as the City's General plan does not indicate any of the referenced plans which could be affected by the project proposal Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than IV BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California El Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. C) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with El 11 11 E established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, El 11 El or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: IV(a). No Impact. The project will not have any effect on any species identified by the California Department of Fish and Game or the US Fish and Wildlife Service. IV(b). No Impact. The project will not have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in any local or regional plans, policies regulations or by the California Department of Fish and game or by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. IV(c). No Impact. The project will not have a substantial effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. There are no federally protected wetlands within the City of Baldwin Park. IV(d). No Impact. The project will not interfere with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites as the City of Baldwin Park is within an urbanized area and not within five (5) miles of a wildlife corridor. IV(e). No Impact. The proposed project does not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, as the City of Baldwin Park does not have any ordinances protecting trees, wildlife, etc... IV(f). No Impact. The project proposal will not conflict with any provisions of an adopted habitat conservation plan, natural community conservation plan or any local, regional or state habitat conservation plan, as the City's General plan does not indicate any of the referenced plans which could be affected by the project proposal Explanation of Checklist Judgements: V(a). No Impact. The project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. V(b). No Impact. The project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource. V(c). No Impact. The project will not directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or geological feature. V(d). No Impact. The project is not expected to disturb any human remains. The City of Baldwin Park does not have any cemeteries. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than V CULTURAL RESOURCES Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project. a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other C) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geological feature? substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred formal outside of cemeteries? Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: V(a). No Impact. The project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. V(b). No Impact. The project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource. V(c). No Impact. The project will not directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or geological feature. V(d). No Impact. The project is not expected to disturb any human remains. The City of Baldwin Park does not have any cemeteries. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than A GEOLOGY AND SOILS Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project. a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist - Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic - related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? C) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on or offsite landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 -1 -B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risk to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? ..- VI(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects involving the rupture of a known earthquake fault. According to the City's General plan, there are no active faults within the City of Baldwin Park, therefore no Aiquist- Priolo Special Study Zones are within the City. Although there are no active faults within the City of Baldwin Park, there are several major faults surrounding the City, which have the potential for causing major damage; however, the occurrence of direct ground rupture is not likely according to the City's General Plan. Potential for this type of activity is similar throughout Southern California and no unique or unusual risk is posed by the proposed project. According to the Seismic Hazard Zones Map dated 3/99 from the State Department of Geology and Mines, the project area is not within a liquefaction zone. VI(b). No Impact. The City is located in a relatively flat urbanized area with a very low potential for wind and water erosion of soils. VI(c). No Impact. The City is not located on a geological unit or soil that is unstable and could result in landslide, spreading liquefaction or collapse according to the Seismic Hazards Zone Map dated March 25, 1999 from the State geologists Office. VI(d). No Impact. The City and the project area are located on a very low to low expansive soil as defined in Table 18 -1 -B of the UBC (1997). Therefore the project will not create any risk to life or property. VI(e). No Impact. The proposed project's location does have sewers available for the disposal of wastewater. Furthermore, the soils at the proposed location can adequately support the use of the sewers. Less Than VII HAZARDS AND Potentially Significant Less Than 14AZARDOUSMATERIALS Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous El materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? C) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one- quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency El EJ El 0 evacuation plan? h) Expose people m structures ma significant risk of loss, injury or uoam m,uwno wimla^d xrem, including wxom wimlamdo are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wim|anuo, F� 1:1 [� 0 Explanation mfChecklist Judgements: VIKo]. No Impact. The project will nVtcr88te 8aignifiC8nt hazard to the public through the routine transport use or disposal Of hazardous materials. It is not anticipated that there will be any hazardous materials associated with the proposed project. V||/b>. No Impact. There will Ueno significant hazard to the public Orthe environment regarding the upset Or release of hazardous materials into the environment. V||/c\. NV Impact. The project will not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous material, substances or waste within one-quarter ofan existing school. V|Kd\. No Impact. The proposed project is not located on a site that is included On a list of hazardous materials sites. VII/e). No Impact. The project is not located within an airport land use plan or within two nnUou of public airport, and thenahJn* vvnu|d not create a hazard to people residing or working in the area. VUUl. No Impact. Since the project is not within the vicinity of private airstrip, the project would not create a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area. VI|(g). No Impact. According h} the City's Emergency Operations Coordinator, the project pnopoae/ will not impair implementation Or physically interfere with the City's adopted emergency plan or emergency evacuation plan. V||/h\. No Impact. The project pnopoaa| ia within a highly urbanized area and will therefore not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wild/and Less Than Vill HYDROLOGY AND WATER Potentially Significant Less Than 51JALITY Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project. a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? C) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on or offsite? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount E] El of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on or offsite? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. Explanation ofChecklist Judgements: VU|(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements, as the facility will generate minimal amounts of solid waste typical for this particular residential use. In aUUition, the applicant will be required to implement the requirements of the National Pollution Elimination Discharge System (NPDES)' which ' regulates water quality runoff. V|/|(b). No Impact. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies or interfere with groundwater recharge. V|||(C). No |mpooL The proposed project will not substantially alter the ooucu8 of an adjacent atn8orn or river, which vvVu|d result in erosion, or siltation 0f the site ao there is no etnaann or river running through the City, which the exception of the channelized San Gabriel River. VU|k0. No Impact. The proposed project will notsubstantially alter the drainage patterns of the City and will not alter the course of a stream or river, as there are no streams or rivers in the City with the exception of the chann8|iz8d San Gabriel River. VU|bA. No Impact. The proposed project will not create or contribute run-off, which would exceed the capacity of the existing storm drain system. Nor will the proposed project provide any polluted run-off. ' V|||Ul. No Impact. The project will not degrade the existing water quality because of the Unnhed amount Vf impervious surfaces associated with the project. VU|kA. No Impact. The project proposal will not place housing within a1 r flood hazard area. Fudhomoon*. the City is not within a Flood Zone. Federal Emergency Management Association (FEMA) has the City of Baldwin Park classified as Zone C-060100. ' NU(h).NoImpact. The proposal is not within o100-yearflood hazard area. FEMA has classified the City of Baldwin Park as Zone C-0601 00. VU|A8. No Impact. The project proposal will not expose people or structures to o significant risk of koao involving flooding as a direct result of the failure of levee or dam. Although the Santa Fe d8nn is located directly adjacent to the City across Arrow Highway, large-scale flooding as a r9au|L of failure of this particular darn is negligible dug to the design of the darn in that water iu present in the dam only a few months Vf the year. VU|A0` NO Impact. Since BakjvvD Park is an inland CUm. it could not experience a tsunami and the few bodies uf water in Baldwin Park are anlaU enough that they would not be able to produce 8 eeioho large enough to cause any damage. Furthermore, Baldwin Park is an urbanized Less Than Vill HYDROLOGY AND WATER Potentially Significant Less Than QUALITY Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which impede would or redirect flood flows? I) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? Explanation ofChecklist Judgements: VU|(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements, as the facility will generate minimal amounts of solid waste typical for this particular residential use. In aUUition, the applicant will be required to implement the requirements of the National Pollution Elimination Discharge System (NPDES)' which ' regulates water quality runoff. V|/|(b). No Impact. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies or interfere with groundwater recharge. V|||(C). No |mpooL The proposed project will not substantially alter the ooucu8 of an adjacent atn8orn or river, which vvVu|d result in erosion, or siltation 0f the site ao there is no etnaann or river running through the City, which the exception of the channelized San Gabriel River. VU|k0. No Impact. The proposed project will notsubstantially alter the drainage patterns of the City and will not alter the course of a stream or river, as there are no streams or rivers in the City with the exception of the chann8|iz8d San Gabriel River. VU|bA. No Impact. The proposed project will not create or contribute run-off, which would exceed the capacity of the existing storm drain system. Nor will the proposed project provide any polluted run-off. ' V|||Ul. No Impact. The project will not degrade the existing water quality because of the Unnhed amount Vf impervious surfaces associated with the project. VU|kA. No Impact. The project proposal will not place housing within a1 r flood hazard area. Fudhomoon*. the City is not within a Flood Zone. Federal Emergency Management Association (FEMA) has the City of Baldwin Park classified as Zone C-060100. ' NU(h).NoImpact. The proposal is not within o100-yearflood hazard area. FEMA has classified the City of Baldwin Park as Zone C-0601 00. VU|A8. No Impact. The project proposal will not expose people or structures to o significant risk of koao involving flooding as a direct result of the failure of levee or dam. Although the Santa Fe d8nn is located directly adjacent to the City across Arrow Highway, large-scale flooding as a r9au|L of failure of this particular darn is negligible dug to the design of the darn in that water iu present in the dam only a few months Vf the year. VU|A0` NO Impact. Since BakjvvD Park is an inland CUm. it could not experience a tsunami and the few bodies uf water in Baldwin Park are anlaU enough that they would not be able to produce 8 eeioho large enough to cause any damage. Furthermore, Baldwin Park is an urbanized City with no hillsides to speak of and therefore, damage caused by mudflow would be negligible. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: IX(a). No Impact. The proposed Zone Change and General Plan Amendment will not physically divide an established community but will increase the allowable density previously allowed in the single - family residential zone. The maximum permitted density for the current single - family zoning is 0 to 8.7 du /ac. The maximum permitted density for the newly created multi - family zoning will be 12.1 to 20 du /ac. This increase in density will allow for the construction of a nineteen (19) unit residential planned development provided that the development meets all standards and criteria set forth in the Specific Plan. IX(b). No Impact. The proposed project, if approved, will not be in conflict with any land use plan, policy or regulation of an agency that has jurisdiction over the project adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. Thus, not creating any conflict with the land use map (proposed to be amended) if the request is approved. IX(c). No Impact. Currently the City has no habitat conservation plans or natural community conservation plans which would possible be affected by the proposed project. Less Than Less Than Potentially Significant Potentially Significant Less Than Significant IX LAND USE AND PLANNING Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Would the project: Incorporation a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents Would the project: b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally - important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general a) Physically divide an established community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, El El local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? El C) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: IX(a). No Impact. The proposed Zone Change and General Plan Amendment will not physically divide an established community but will increase the allowable density previously allowed in the single - family residential zone. The maximum permitted density for the current single - family zoning is 0 to 8.7 du /ac. The maximum permitted density for the newly created multi - family zoning will be 12.1 to 20 du /ac. This increase in density will allow for the construction of a nineteen (19) unit residential planned development provided that the development meets all standards and criteria set forth in the Specific Plan. IX(b). No Impact. The proposed project, if approved, will not be in conflict with any land use plan, policy or regulation of an agency that has jurisdiction over the project adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. Thus, not creating any conflict with the land use map (proposed to be amended) if the request is approved. IX(c). No Impact. Currently the City has no habitat conservation plans or natural community conservation plans which would possible be affected by the proposed project. Explanation of ••- X(a). No Impact. The project will not result in the loss of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region or the residents of the State. There are no known mineral resources located within the City of Baldwin Park according to the City's General Plan. X(b). No Impact. The project will not result in the loss of a locally important mineral resource recovery site, as the City's General Plan does not indicate any known mineral resources. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than X MINERAL RESOURCES Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally - important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use Ian? Explanation of ••- X(a). No Impact. The project will not result in the loss of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region or the residents of the State. There are no known mineral resources located within the City of Baldwin Park according to the City's General Plan. X(b). No Impact. The project will not result in the loss of a locally important mineral resource recovery site, as the City's General Plan does not indicate any known mineral resources. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: ><|(a). Lnaa Than Significant |nnp8oL The proposed project will not result in the exposure of persons toorgeneration of noise levels in excess of standards nebsb|iahod in the City's General Plan, noise ordinance or applicable standards of other agencies. Should the project be approved, noise levels would increase temporarily during the construction phase of the project. Construction io regulated by the City and ia addressed in the Municipal Code to limit overall noise levels to an acceptable range. Increased population and development will result in increasing noise from a variety Of anun:ne commonly found in an urban environment (human acUvihoe, mechanical equipment, ` automobiles, pets, etc.). This increase iS considered tobo less than significant. X|(b). No Impact. The project will not result in the exposure of persons to generation of excess ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels. )(|/o\. No Impact. The project will not result in aeubatsntia/ permanent increase Of ambient noise levels. 0/d\. No Impact. The project will nod naeu|t in a substantial or periodic ino/oeoe in ambient noise levels above levels that exist. X/(e). No Impact. The {}bv of Baldwin Park is not located within an airport land use p|8D not within two miles of an airport. Therefore, the amendment will not expose people to excessive noise levels. ){|/0. No Impact. The City of Baldwin Park is not within the vicinity of a private airstrip. Therefore, the amendment will not expose people to excessive noise levels. ess Than Potentially Significant Less Than X11 NOISE Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or El El N El noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? 0 D El b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? 0 C) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing F] D without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: ><|(a). Lnaa Than Significant |nnp8oL The proposed project will not result in the exposure of persons toorgeneration of noise levels in excess of standards nebsb|iahod in the City's General Plan, noise ordinance or applicable standards of other agencies. Should the project be approved, noise levels would increase temporarily during the construction phase of the project. Construction io regulated by the City and ia addressed in the Municipal Code to limit overall noise levels to an acceptable range. Increased population and development will result in increasing noise from a variety Of anun:ne commonly found in an urban environment (human acUvihoe, mechanical equipment, ` automobiles, pets, etc.). This increase iS considered tobo less than significant. X|(b). No Impact. The project will not result in the exposure of persons to generation of excess ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels. )(|/o\. No Impact. The project will not result in aeubatsntia/ permanent increase Of ambient noise levels. 0/d\. No Impact. The project will nod naeu|t in a substantial or periodic ino/oeoe in ambient noise levels above levels that exist. X/(e). No Impact. The {}bv of Baldwin Park is not located within an airport land use p|8D not within two miles of an airport. Therefore, the amendment will not expose people to excessive noise levels. ){|/0. No Impact. The City of Baldwin Park is not within the vicinity of a private airstrip. Therefore, the amendment will not expose people to excessive noise levels. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XII(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The provision of nineteen (19) residential units will increase the population of the area, which will result in higher levels of traffic and increased demands on municipal agencies. The increase in population will create a less than significant impact. According to the Population and Housing Estimates for Individual Counties from the Department of Finance, an increase would be expected to occur with an average of 4.636 persons per dwelling, which creates an approximate increase of eighty -eight (88) persons. The potential result of increased manpower and equipment needed to serve citywide demands are evaluated annually. The provision of nineteen (19) residential units is considered less than a significant impact. The zone change will not increase the population by 88 people, but rather is only a net increase of twenty - eight (28) persons (6 units) based on the sixty (60) persons (13 -R -1 units) allowed under the R -1, Single- Family Zoning. XII(b). No Impact. The proposed project will not displace any existing housing units that will necessitate the replacement or construction of residential units. XII(c). No Impact. The proposed project will not displace substantial number of individuals /families necessitating the construction of replacement housing. Less Than Less Than Potentially Significant Potentially Significant Less Than Significant XII POPULATION AND HOUSING Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Would the project: result in substantial adverse physical impacts Incorporation Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable roads or other infrastructure)? El b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing any of the public services? elsewhere? El El 11 a) Fire protection? C) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the housing elsewhere? C) Schools? construction of replacement e) Other public facilities? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XII(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The provision of nineteen (19) residential units will increase the population of the area, which will result in higher levels of traffic and increased demands on municipal agencies. The increase in population will create a less than significant impact. According to the Population and Housing Estimates for Individual Counties from the Department of Finance, an increase would be expected to occur with an average of 4.636 persons per dwelling, which creates an approximate increase of eighty -eight (88) persons. The potential result of increased manpower and equipment needed to serve citywide demands are evaluated annually. The provision of nineteen (19) residential units is considered less than a significant impact. The zone change will not increase the population by 88 people, but rather is only a net increase of twenty - eight (28) persons (6 units) based on the sixty (60) persons (13 -R -1 units) allowed under the R -1, Single- Family Zoning. XII(b). No Impact. The proposed project will not displace any existing housing units that will necessitate the replacement or construction of residential units. XII(c). No Impact. The proposed project will not displace substantial number of individuals /families necessitating the construction of replacement housing. XIII(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project should not result in the additional need for new or altered fire protection and will not alter acceptable service ratios or response times. Currently Station 29 serves the City, which is located at Los Angeles Street and Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than XIII PUBLIC SERVICES Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services? El El El 11 El El E 0 11 R 11 a) Fire protection? b) Police protection? C) Schools? d) Parks? e) Other public facilities? XIII(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project should not result in the additional need for new or altered fire protection and will not alter acceptable service ratios or response times. Currently Station 29 serves the City, which is located at Los Angeles Street and Maine Avenue. The net increase of 28 persons is considered less than significant. Whether or not the project would require additional police service or fire staff depends on the total requirements of the City and County. XIII(b). Less Than Significant Impact. Public services are already in place to serve this development. Although the project may result in some increase in police calls the net increase of 28 persons is considered less than significant. XIII(c). Less Than Significant Impact. The net impact of the project on the school facilities will have less than a significant impact. There would be an increase in local school enrollment. However, the project would only result in an estimated net increase in population of up to 28 persons with up to eleven (11) school -aged children (40% of the total between the ages of 0 20). School impact fees collected prior to occupancy are intended to offset any potential demand for new school facilities. School Development fees in the amount of $2.14/s.f. shall be paid to the Baldwin Park Unified School District prior to obtaining building permits. These fees are considered to provide full and complete school facilities. Therefore, the net increase of 28 persons and eleven (11) school -aged children is considered less than significant. XIII(d). Less Than Significant Impact. Although residential development for this proposed project will provide an estimated net increase of 28 persons and up to eleven (11) school -aged children to the population, the project is not expected to significantly impact the City's existing parks or recreational facilities. The City's Development Tax collected prior to occupancy is intended to offset any potential demand for recreational facilities. Therefore, the estimated net increase of 28 persons and up to eleven (11) school -aged children is considered less than significant. XIII(e). No Impact. The proposed project will not require the need for new or physically altered public facilities. Explanation of •• XIV(a). No Impact. The proposed project is not expected to significantly impact the City's existing parks or recreational facilities. XIV(b). No Impact. The proposed project does not require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. Less Than Less Than Potentially Significant Potentially Significant Less Than Significant XIV RECREATION Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Would the project: Incorporation a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in relation a) Would the project increase the use of existing El 0 El vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational congestion at intersections)? facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Explanation of •• XIV(a). No Impact. The proposed project is not expected to significantly impact the City's existing parks or recreational facilities. XIV(b). No Impact. The proposed project does not require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than XV TRANSPORTATION%TR FFIC Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incor oration Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of El El 0 El vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of ❑ service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? C) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an ❑ increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results ❑ in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ❑ (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or ❑ incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ XV(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will result in an estimated increase in traffic generated by the net gain of 6 residential units, which will be less than a significant impact. According to the Trip Generation Handbook by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (5th ed.) each dwelling unit will generate approximately 9.55 trip ends per dwelling unit on a weekday, 10.19 trip ends on Saturday, 8.78 trip ends on Sunday with an average of about 9.5 trip ends per day. The net gain of 6 residential units at this location is not substantial and thus will not require large -scale physical improvements. Approval of the proposed project shall be contingent upon provision of an assessment by a certified Traffic Engineer, of access road(s) to the subject properties. Traffic conditions shall be analyzed for the opening year. Occupancy permits shall be issued upon approval of sufficient and effective circulation at entry and exit points. In conjunction with the aforementioned assessments a warrant assessment shall be conducted to evaluate any potential installation of stop signs or traffic signal at the proposed entry /exit points. The developer shall implement, prepare submittals and pay for all costs /fees related to the Traffic Engineer's recommendations. XV(b). No Impact. The proposal will not exceed a level of service standard established by the County Congestion Management Agency for designated roads or highways. XV(c). No Impact. The proposal will not result in a change or increase in air traffic patterns or levels that result in substantial safety risks. XV(d). No Impact. The proposal will not increase hazards due to a design feature or incompatible uses, as the project does not include new construction of streets. XV(e). No Impact. The project will not result in inadequate emergency access. XV(f). No Impact. The proposed project will not have an impact on existing parking facilities or create a need for new parking as the site meets the required parking standards contained within the Municipal Code. Private parking areas contained within the required two car garages will be provided for each dwelling unit as well as guest parking. XV(g). No Impact. The proposed project will not conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XVI(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. XVI(b). No Impact. The proposed project will not require the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or the expansion of existing facilities. XVI(c). No Impact. The project site is not within a flood zone area. The increase in impervious surfaces primarily due to the proposed street will marginally increase runoff from the project area. The project will be required to provide satisfactory drainage to available storm drains. XVI(d). No Impact. The project will not affect existing water supplies provided to the City. XVI(e). No Impact. The proposed amendment does not involve a project that will result in a determination by the watershed treatment provider that it has adequate capacity to serve a demand. XVI(f). Less Than Significant Impact. A gain in 19 residential units will increase the demand for solid waste disposal; however, the level of solid waste generation is small in comparison to total solid waste disposal on a regional level. The City in an effort to reduce the amount of solid waste disposed currently provides recycling containers to residents for the recycling of paper, glass, plastic and aluminum. Waste Management, the City waste hauler utilizes the Puente Hills landfill which has enough permitted capacity to accommodate the proposed project's waste disposal needs. XVI(g). No Impact. The proposed project will comply with all federal, state and local statutes relating to solid waste. Less Than XVI UTILITIES AND SERVICE Potentially Significant Less Than SYSTEMS Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the Regional applicable Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? C) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XVI(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. XVI(b). No Impact. The proposed project will not require the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or the expansion of existing facilities. XVI(c). No Impact. The project site is not within a flood zone area. The increase in impervious surfaces primarily due to the proposed street will marginally increase runoff from the project area. The project will be required to provide satisfactory drainage to available storm drains. XVI(d). No Impact. The project will not affect existing water supplies provided to the City. XVI(e). No Impact. The proposed amendment does not involve a project that will result in a determination by the watershed treatment provider that it has adequate capacity to serve a demand. XVI(f). Less Than Significant Impact. A gain in 19 residential units will increase the demand for solid waste disposal; however, the level of solid waste generation is small in comparison to total solid waste disposal on a regional level. The City in an effort to reduce the amount of solid waste disposed currently provides recycling containers to residents for the recycling of paper, glass, plastic and aluminum. Waste Management, the City waste hauler utilizes the Puente Hills landfill which has enough permitted capacity to accommodate the proposed project's waste disposal needs. XVI(g). No Impact. The proposed project will comply with all federal, state and local statutes relating to solid waste. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XVII(a). No Impact. The proposed project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of major periods of California history or prehistory. XVII(b). No Impact. The project does not have impacts that are individually limited but cumulatively considerable. A majority of the environmental factors analyzed within this initial study will not have an impact by the proposed project. XVII(c). No Impact. The project does not create environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. Less Than XVIII MANDATORY FINDINGS OF Potentially Significant Less Than SIGNIFICANCE Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Does the project: a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or El 11 El animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ( "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) C) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either El El El directly or indirectly? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XVII(a). No Impact. The proposed project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of major periods of California history or prehistory. XVII(b). No Impact. The project does not have impacts that are individually limited but cumulatively considerable. A majority of the environmental factors analyzed within this initial study will not have an impact by the proposed project. XVII(c). No Impact. The project does not create environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. Ink CITY OF BALDWIN PARK .•l l��J f!! r_— Lill Ld�Lllt1 l�r'�J /��f�Ii /�'hL!`.!/LA� /ri CERTIFICATION Vwe acknowledge the ffmg of this application and certify that all the above infbrrnatim is true arW accurate Signature Date FOR C[TY USE ONLY: Fife No.: Fee: Received by: Date: F /P1anninp/Form.0- andapp 9 14403 ', BALDWIN 91706 ♦�?i BALDMN TYPE OF • )L General Plan Amendment _ Zone Change Conditional Developrnmt Plan Specific Plan Approval Other APPLICATION •• , f. s , .J Owner(s) of RecoFd O. • . 1 ...:ti PROPEkTY**;01RMATI9m Location r Assessor ParcW Number(s) 7F,10-7 Z�-gf 107 Existing General Plan Designation Existing Zoning • each parcel Existing Land Use _f..f.: .�:MI f.t I:f • _ t1._t t _.• .•l l��J f!! r_— Lill Ld�Lllt1 l�r'�J /��f�Ii /�'hL!`.!/LA� /ri CERTIFICATION Vwe acknowledge the ffmg of this application and certify that all the above infbrrnatim is true arW accurate Signature Date FOR C[TY USE ONLY: Fife No.: Fee: Received by: Date: F /P1anninp/Form.0- andapp 9 0 MWHIM��_ LIM-Al 41 HIA ri M 011 M LO]"M • a 37-EMM SPECIFIC PLAN DC Corporation is requesting a Specific Plan in order to subdivide two acres (87,199 sq. ft) into 19 Lots. Eighteen of the lots will have new homes and one lot, Lot 15, will require the remodeling of an existing home. 1. The project site has unique circumstances which justify the need for a specific plan. These circumstances include: a. Desire of seller to remain in existing home. b. Unusual shape of project site. c. Need to extend Kenmore Street as part of General Plan d. Unwillingness of a specific property owner to sell a portion of his property at a reasonable price to allow construction of Kenmore Street. e. Requirement to ensure access to adjacent property to permit future development. 2. This property is the logical place for the uses contemplated by the Specific Plan because the property is currently used for single family detached homes and will continue to be used for single family detached homes. 3. The proposed Specific Plan will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City because the contemplated use is consistent with the General Plan and includes implementation of a part of the General Plan, the extension of Kenmore Street. 4. There are no deed restrictions which affect development of the property. 1. The zone change from R-1 to R-3 will benefit the adjoining neighborhood by removing two blighted homes and remodeling an existing home, and extending Kenmore Street in accordance with the General Plan. 2. The use under the current zoning, single family detached homes, and the proposed use of single-family detached homes is the same. The property involved in the proposed change is more suited for the zone requested because it will revitalize the existing home, remove two blighted homes, and as a result of the construction of 18 new homes increase property values for surrounding properties and increase the tax base for the City. 3. The uses permitted by the proposed zone would not be detrimental to surrounding properties in any way. The proposed project can be expected to increase property values our-d'i; -_.-_,operties and allow future development through the extension of Kenmore ,,w sairr ng: Street. 4. There are no deed restrictions which affect development of the property. W) Q Q A A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 1. DC Corporation is requesting a General Plan Amendment changing the General Plan designation from Single-Family Residential to Multi-Family Residential in order to adopt the requested Specific Plan. ATTACHMENT RESOLUTION 2005-007 RESOLUTION 2005 -007 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DENYING REQUESTS FOR (1) AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT TO REDESIGNATE PROPERTY FROM SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO MULTI - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, (2) A ZONE CHANGE FROM R -1, SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO R -3, MULTI - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, (3) A SPECIFIC PLAN WITH INCLUDED DEVELOPMENT PLAN ALLOWING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NINETEEN (19) UNIT SINGLE- FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND (4)) A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO SUBDIVIDE FIVE LOTS INTO NINETEEN LOTS FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES (APPLICANT: D.C. CORPORATION; CASE NO.: AGP -110, Z -545, SP 04 -01, DR -30 and TM- 61345; LOCATION: 3940 -3948 WALNUT STREET)„ THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1 The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby find, determine, and declare as follows: a) That an application ( "Application ") for a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Specific Plan, Development Plan and Tentative Tract Map was submitted on behalf of the owners of certain real property, located at 3940 -3948 Walnut Street in the City of Baldwin Park (the "Property"), described more particularly in the Application on file with the Planning Division; and b) That the Application is requesting the required legislative and administrative approvals necessary to allow the construction of a nineteen (19) unit Single- Family Detached Residential Development on the Property; and c) That on December 16, 2004, a duly noticed public hearing was held on the Application by the Planning Commission, at the conclusion of which the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council deny the Application; and d) That on February 2, 2005, a duly noticed public hearing was held on the Application by the City Council; and e) That each fact set forth in the staff report presented to the City Council on February 2, 2005, is true and correct and accepted as a fact by the City Council. SECTION 2. Based upon information provided, including but not limited to the Negative Declaration, the staff report presented to the City Council regarding the Application, and the testimony received at the hearing, the City Council hereby finds and determines: Resolution 2005 -007 Page 2 a. That the amendment to the General Plan and the change of zone sought in the Application would be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare; and b. That the findings required for approval of the Specific Plan and Development Plan cannot be made since the density proposed exceeds that permitted by the General Plan and consistent zoning regulations, and required off - street parking is not provided; C. That the findings required for approval of the Tentative Tract Map cannot be made, as the Project is inconsistent with the General Plan and zoning which would be consistent with the General Plan, SECTION 3. Based upon the findings set forth above, and its legislative discretion, the City Council hereby finds and determines that the Application shall be denied. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and forward a copy hereof to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and the Applicant. PASSED AND APPROVED this 2nd day of February 2005. MANUEL LOZANO MAYOR ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK I, ROSEMARY RAMIREZ, Chief Deputy City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park at a regular meeting of the City Council on February 2, 2005, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS, ABSENT; COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ROSEMARY R s s DEPUTY CHIEF FAA 6W BALDWIN P A, R, K TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Mark P. Kling, Chief of Polic 3PA DATE: February 2, 2005 SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION 2005 -001 APPROVING FEES FOR POLICE RELATED SERVICES PURPOSE This item continues the public hearing that commenced at the January 5, 2005, City Council meeting. This report requests the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2005 - -001, which establishes new fees and increases existing fees for police related services. BACKGROUND The fees for the issuance, processing and filing of various police related services have not been amended to meet the rise in costs of these services since May 2000. Since that time, new City police services have been added and the compensation rates for all police employees have increased. At the current rate, police employees routinely process public fingerprint requests. The existing administrative and rolling fee for this service is $12.00. Staff recommends an increase to $15.00. This is a practical increase considering the time it takes to complete the fingerprinting and the administrative portion of the request (approximately 40 minutes). In addition, two new administrative services are now required of the police department, due to recent legislation. The first service deals with the recovery of cost f or t he completion of L ive Scan Fingerprint Rolling public requests. T his service takes approximately 45 minutes to complete. Staff recommends a fee of $20.00. Another new service allows the department to establish a fee for the release and Resolution 2005 -001 Staff Report Another new service allows the department to establish a fee for the release and storage of confiscated firearms. This fee is mandated by AB 2431. This allows the police department to recover the cost of processing, releasing, and storing of firearms by the police department. Staff recommends a $50.00 fee if the owner acts within the first calendar year of receipt. Staff also recommends an additional $2.00 firearm storage fee assessment thereafter in the event the owner ignores our requests to release the firearm(s). As a matter of clarification, firearms will only be released to owners who have acquired a California Department of Justice Firearm release form. There will be no fee charged if the firearm is reported stolen by the owner within five days of the date of theft. At the current time, the release of a firearm takes approximately one hour to process. Department staff recently completed an updated time and motion study to establish rates for completing vehicle storage and maintaining the towing program. The previous time and motion study had not been amended since May 2000, and did not take into consideration dispatch communication's time associated with vehicle storage and the time in maintaining the towing program. The processing steps and time for the completion /processing of a vehicle have increased with the added police administrative and operations procedures. The compensation rates for all police employees involved in the storage of a vehicle and maintaining the towing program have also increased. The combination of these two rates substantially increases the time and motion rates for a vehicle storage processing. Currently, the City Municipal Code allows the Department to establish a franchise agreement with a City authorized towing company. The towing company, as part of the franchise agreement, reimburses the City $25.00 per towed vehicle as allowed per California Vehicle Code § 12110 for maintaining the towing program. This rate was based on the May 2000 time and motion study and the police employee compensation rates for that period. Furthermore, in addition to the franchise fee the Police Department charges the legal owner of a stored /impounded 'vehicle an administrative fee as allowed per California Vehicle Code § 22850.5 for the removal, impound, storage or release of the vehicle. This fee is $90.00 for regular storage and $100.00 for a 30 -day storage. The towing program time and motion study and current police and other City employee compensation rates establishes a basis for the City Council to consider revising rates for the franchise agreement fee not to exceed $52.48 per vehicle towed. The updated time and motion study and current police employee compensation rates establish a basis to increase the public administrative release fee not to exceed $113.22. Staff recommends that City Council consider increasing both the Towing Franchise Agreement Fee and the legal owner administrative impound /storage release fee. Prepared by Sergeant D. Reynoso Resolution 2005 -001 Staff Report The City Council has the discretion to accept these fees or a lower amount, so long as any one amount does not exceed the amount reflected by the time and motion studies. The City attorney has reviewed these fees and services and approved them as to form and content. FISCAL IMPACT Staff estimates the City's General Fund will receive an annual `revenue enhancement of approximately $3,300.00 from the revision of the time and motion study, and for establishing new police services and fees associated with these services. These fee increases will recover costs associated with processing` such services. Additionally, staff estimates the City' General Fund will receive an additional $85,808.80 annual revenue enhancement from the increase of the Franchise tow program and the legal owner administrative impound /storage associated fees. These fee increases will recover costs associated with processing such services. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends City Council: _1) Review < the current fees and staff recommended fees outlined in proposed Resolution No. 2005 -001; 2) Set the adopted fee schedules for police related fees outlined in Resolution No. 2005 001 and 3) Waive further reading, read by title only and adopt Resolution No. 2005 -001 entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK APPROVING THE MODIFYING AND SETTING FEES FOR ISSUANCE, PROCESSING, AND FILING OF VARIOUS CITY SERVICES IN THE CITY, SPECIFICALLY THOSE FEES RELATING TO POLICE RELATED SERVICES AND MODIFYING THE POLICE TIME AND MOTION RATES FOR VEHICLE STORAGES." ATTACHMENTS • Resolution No. 2005 -001 • Resolution 2005 -001 Fiscal Impact Attachment • Schedule of Police Compensation Rates • AB 2431 • California Vehicle Code § 12110 and § 22850.5 • Surrounding Police Agency Impound /Storage Fee Survey Prepared by Sergeant D. Reynoso RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -001 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK FEES- FOR POLICE RELATED SERVICES WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2005 -001 generally `sets forth the costs for the issuing and processing and filing of various City services; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to revise the fee schedules relating to police related fees as set forth in Resolutions 2000 -39; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was duly noticed and published on December 20, 2004. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the cost of issuing, processing, and the use of City Police Services and the time and motion rates for vehicle storages shall be in accordance with the attached Schedule of Fees and Charges, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit `A'; and Section 2. That the fee schedules and time and motion rates set forth in Exhibit `A' supercede those fee schedules provided in Resolution 2000 -039 relating to Police schedule of fees and cost of Police services; and Section 3. That all fees set forth in Resolution 2000 -039 that are not in conflict with those established by this Resolution shall remain in full force and effect; and Section 4. Than development related fees shall become effective sixty (60) days after the effective date of this resolution; and Section 5. That the City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of the Resolution and shall cause the same to be processed in the manner required by law. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of February, 2005. MANUEL LOZANO MAYOR Resolution No. 2005 -001 Page 2 MANUEL LOZANO MAYOR ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ss. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK I, ROSEMARY M. RAMIREZ, CIVIC, Chief Deputy City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park at a regular meeting thereof held on the 2nd day of February, 2005 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: ROSEMARY M. RAMIREZ, CIVIC CHIEF DEPUTY CITY CLERK Resolution No. 2005 -001 Page 3 Exhibit "A" Baldwin Park Police Department Processing Steps and Time for the processing of the towing program described in California Vehicle Code § 12110 to establish a towing franchise fee Processing time fora Police Captain: 15 minutes Steps Involved in the Towing Program: Review of the monthly towing report, to include the franchise fee check, and the review of the disposition of all vehicles towed /impounded during the month Processing Time for the Chief of Police: 10 minutes Steps Involved in the Towing Program: Review of the monthly towing report, to include the franchise fee check, and the review of the disposition of all vehicles towed /impounded during the month Processing Time by the Administrative Secretary (Records Spec. II): 10 minutes Steps Involved in the Towing Program: Delivery and deposit of the monthly franchise fee check with the finance clerk Processing Time for a Finance Clerk: 10 minutes Steps Involved in the Towing Program: Deposit of the monthly franchise fee check Processing Time for a Sr. Finance Clerk: 10 minutes Steps Involved in the Towing Program: Deposit of the monthly franchise fee check and verification of the deposit Resolution No. 2005 -001 Page 4 Compensation Rates Position Hourly Rate Benefits Total Police Captain* $50.78 $39.03 $89.81 Chief of Police $57.69- $46.64 $104.33 Records Spec II ** $15.44 $8.43 $23.87 Finance Clerk* $14.66 $8.24 $22.90 Sr. Finance Clark* $19.77 $9.47 $29.24 * = Calculated @ Hourly Rate for Step 5 Employee ** = Calculated @ Hourly Rate for Step 4 Employee Time and Motion Rates for the Processing of the Towing Program Position Time Pay Rate Cost Police Captain * 15 minutes $89.81 $22.45 Chief of Police 10 minutes $104.33 $17.38 Records Spec Il ** 10 minutes $23.87 $3.97 Finance Clerk* 10 minutes $22.90 $3.81 Sr. Finance Clark* 10 minutes $29.24 $4.87 Total Cost $52.48 All time and motion rates calculated at Pay Rate 160 (for minutes) x Time Resolution No. 2005 -001 Page 5 Baldwin Park Police Department Processing Steps and Time for the completion /processing of a vehicle storage as described in California Vehicle Code § 22850.5 Processing time for a Patrol Officer: 45 minutes Steps Involved in Handling CHP 180: Request registration /stolen information via the radio Inventory vehicle /complete CHP 180 report Deliver report to police station Obtain and attach computer printout to report Have report reviewed and approved Log report into report ledger Processing Time in Communications: 40 minutes Steps Involved in Handling CHP 180: Obtain vehicle information from officer or citizen Complete DMV registration check and dispatch call if necessary Relay vehicle /case information to officer Telephone Tow Agency Add vehicle information to tow ledger, Input vehicle status information into CAD Input vehicle information into CLETS Monitor call on CAD screen for duration of the call Processing Time by Watch Supervisor: 5 minutes Steps Involved in Handling CHP 180: Review report for accuracy /completeness Log report as approved in ledger Assist records /approve release of vehicles Processing Time in Records Section: 70 minutes Steps Involved in Handling CHP' 180: Processing: 5 minutes Accept report and pull case folder Complete registration to verify report information Notification: 10 minutes Complete notification form and mail R /O, L/O and Storage facility File with case Entry of Report: 10 minutes Enter case and R/O into computer system Resolution No'. 2005 -001 Page 6 Release: 20 minutes Search CAD for case number Verify R/O information and license status Get supervisor approval for release of the vehicle Complete form for R/O signature Make copy of release for R/O to present at storage facility Supply R/O with directions to storage facility Re -file report Paperwork not current: 10 minutes` Send new R/O to DMV for registration update Send R/O to DMV to pay expired registration. Upon return perform release again. Telephone Contact: 5 minutes Obtain license number from R/O Search CAD for case number Obtain case and determine cause of storage Tell R/O what is necessary to obtain release Re -file report - Notice of impound returned: " 10 minutes Pull case to determine if vehicle has been released Mark notification form of non - release and send copy to DOJ Attach returned envelope to original storage form' Re -file case Resolution No. 2005 -001 Page 7 Compensation Rates Position Hourly Rate* Benefits * ** Total Police Officer* $40.81 $34.68 $75.49 Dispatcher $18.64 $7.90 $26.54 Police Sergeant $33.76 $27.60 $61.36 Police Lieutenant $39.91 $31.77 $71.68 Records Spec. 11 $15.44 $8.43 $23.87 * = Calculated @ 1.5 Police Officers ** = Step 4 Employee * ** = Calculated @ Hourly Rate for Step 4 Employee Rate of One Police Officer for Reference $27.2124 $23.12 $50.33 Time and Motion Rates for a Vehicle Storage Processing Position Time Pay Rate Cost Police Officer* 45 minutes $75.49 $56.61 Dispatcher 40 minutes $26.54 $17.69 Police Sergeant 5 minutes $61.36 $5.11 Police Lieutenant 5 minutes $71.68 $5.97 Records Specialist 70 minutes $23.87 $27.84 Total Cost $113.22 • = Calculated @ 1.5 Police Officers All time and motion rates calculated at Pay Rate / 60 (for minutes) x Time Resolution No. 2005 -001 Page 8 Current Recommended Adopted Police Reports: Includes crime reports, collision $20 $20 reports, clearance letters; repossession forms, S'DTs and log cards Photograph Copy Release $10.00 (per $10.00 (per photograph) photograph) Release and Storage of New Service *$50 release Firearms to the Public and storage fee if Mandated by AB 2431 completed within one There will be, no fee charged to calendar year reclaim a recovered firearm if the of receipt. An gun was additional $2 reported stolen, within five (5) storage fee for days of theft. every month after the first calendar year. Police Background Service no Investigations -Civil longer provided Citation Verifications- $15.00 $15.00 equipment Violations Fingerprints: Applicant supplies cards & Service no forwards to DOJ for clearance longer provided - Administrative and rolling fee for $12.00 $15.00 public fingerprint request Live Scan Rolling Fees New Service $20.00 Vehicle Impounds: Impound /Stored vehicles- release $90.00 $113.22 Impound /Stored vehicles for 30 $100.00 $113.22 days- release DUI Stored vehicle- release $250.00 $250.00 Resolution No. 2005 -001 Page 9 Current Recommended Adopted Towing Franchise Fee Per $25.00 Not to exceed Vehicle $52.48 Vendor Carts (human powered) $120.00 $120.00 Vendor Merchandise (post court $45.00 $45.00 disposition) Shopping Cart retrieval (per cart) Service no longer provided Civil Subpoena Service for *$40.00 for $40.00/$150.00 Police Officers: federal subpoenas and * Mandated by 28 U.S.C, Section $150 for all 1821 others. Bold Recommendations indicates change in fee or new service. Fiscal Impact Attachment The increase fingerprint rolling fee, the new public live scan request and the new firearm release and storage fees will provide a revenue enhancement to the City. The Department's Police Records Specialists complete approximately 25 public fingerprint requests a month. Staff recommends a $5.00 increase in this service, which could generate an additional $1500.00 per fiscal year. The public live scan request fee is a new service yet to be used by the public. This new service provides the public with a Department of Justice clearance fingerprint request for employment purposes. Staff anticipates a revenue enhancement, however, the annual amount depends upon the needs of this service by the public. The fee for the cost of processing, releasing and temporarily storing of confiscated firearms by the police department is a new service. Currently the Police Property/Evidence Bureau releases approximately three firearms per month. Staff estimates this service would generate a revenue enhancement of an additional $1800.00 per fiscal year. TIME AND MOTION STUDY: The previous time and motion study, which established a basis for police related rates for processing vehicle storage calculated the total processing cost at $29.51. The City Council approved Resolution No. 2000-039, which established a basis for the franchise fee agreement. This amount was used to implement the current Towing Franchise Agreement Fee of assessing $25.00 per vehicle reimbursed to the City. Currently, the City Municipal Code allows the Department to establish a franchise agreement with a City authorized towing company. The towing company, as part of the franchise agreement, reimburses the City $25.00 per towed vehicle as allowed per California Vehicle Code § 12110 for maintaining the towing program. This rate was based on the May 2000 time and motion study and the police employee compensation rates for that period. Furthermore, in addition to the franchise fee the Police Department charges the legal owner of a stored/impounded vehicle an administrative fee as allowed per California Vehicle Code § 22850.5 for the removal, impound, storage or release of the vehicle. This fee is $90.00 for regular storage and $100.00 for a 30-day storage The towing program time and motion study and current police and other City employee compensation rates establishes a basis for the City Council to consider revising rates for the franchise agreement fee not to exceed $52.48 per vehicle towed. The updated time and motion study and current police employee compensation rates establish a basis to increase the public administrative release fee not to exceed $113.22. During fiscal year 2003 -2004, the Police Department stored 1784 vehicles. At the current franchise rate of $25.00 per vehicle, the City received approximately $44,600.00 in franchise fees. At the proposed rate of $52.48 per vehicle imposed on the franchise fee, this would be $93,624.00, an increase of $49,024.32 (109 % increase) annually. Of the 1784 vehicles stored approximately 444 (37 monthly average) were 30- day storages that the City received approximately $44,400.00 in release fees on ($100.00 per release). At the proposed rate of $113.22 per vehicle release fee, this would be $50,269.68, an increase of approximately $5669.68 (7.8% increase). The remaining vehicles were regular storages with a $90.00 release fee. The City received approximately $120,600.00 in release fees from this service. At the proposed rate of $113.22 per vehicle release fee, this would be $151,714.80, an increase of approximately $31,114.80 (3.8% increase). The three potential increases involved with the towing program and vehicle release fees, have an approximate $85,808.80 annual revenue enhancement. Compensation Rates - Hrly Rate Benefits Cost Police Ofcer (1.5) 1 40.8124 34.68', 75 49241 Dispatcher 18.6447 7.9 26.5447 _._ Police Sgt. 33.7607 , 27.6 61.36071 Police Lt. 1 39.9121 31.77 _ 71.6821 I - Records Spec. 11 - 15.44981 8.431 I 23.8798, - - Police Chief _ ! 57.6923 -- � 46.64, _104.3323 _ - - -- Police Captain I � 50.7896 1 39 03 _ 1 89 8196 Finance Clerk 14.66 8.24 - 22.9000 Sr. Finance Clerk 19.7768! i 9.471 29.2468 Benefits -Non Sworn *Benefits - Sworn ** I Police Ofcr: Based on Hrly Rate Dispatcher Cafe 4.03 4.03' City Paid Vision 0.171 0.17; PERS% 57.572 15.66 PERS 14% 1.301(ER /EE Pd} _ Wrkr's Comp 8% 2.17, 1.49' '- Disability Ins 2.10% 0.57 0.39 Life Insurance 0.40 0.40 _ Unemployment Ins 0.121 0. 12 23..12 7.90 Police Sgt. Records Spec. II Cafe 4.031 4.03 - City Paid Vision 0.17 0.17' - PERS %57.572 19.48 2PERS 14% 2.16' Wrkr's Comp 8% 2.70 . 1.23i: _ Disability Ins. 2.10% - 0.70 -_. 0.32 - Life Insurance 0.40i 0.401 Unemployment Ins. 0.121 0.12 -_ - - 27.6 8.43 - I Schedule of Police � !Compensation Rates I - Hrly Rate ;Benefits Cost j Police Ofcer (1.5) 40'.81241;1 34.68 75.4924 Dispatcher 18.6447 7.9 1 26.5447 Police Sgt. 33.7607 27.6 61.3607 Police Lt. 39.9121 J 31.771 - , 71.6821 Records Spec. II 15.4498 I 8.43 23.8798 Benefits -Non Sworn *Benefits- Sworn ** - - - -- - -- - - - - -- Police Ofcr: Based on Hrly Rate Dispatcher Cafe - 4.03 - - -- - 4.03 City Paid Vision 0.17 - -- 0.17 - - _ _ PERS %57.572 -- 15.661 i PERS 14% - - - - -� 1.30 (ER /EE Pd) - - Wrkr's Comp 8% 2.17 1.4 Disability Ins 2.10% 0.57' -- - - - -- 0.391 Life Insurance 0.40 0.40, Unemployment Ins 0.12 0.121 7.90 Police Sgt. j - Records Spec. II Cafe 4.03 4.03 City Paid Vision 0.17 0.17 - - PERS% 57.572 19.48; PERS 14% 2 .161 Wrkr's Comp 8% 2.70 1.23 Disability Ins. 2.10% 0.70 -- - - - -- 0.32 Life Insurance 0.40' I 0.40� , Unemployment Ins. - 0.12 0.12 L 27.6 8.43, Police Lt. Cafe 4.031 1 City Paid Vision 0.17 - - - -' -- - -- - - -_ PERS 57.572% Wrkr's Comp 8% 1 23.03{1 3.19; Disability Ins. 2.10% 0.83 Life Insurance 0.4 Unem to ment Ins. i? Y 0.7 3 (SACRAMENTO) — Attorney General Bill Lockyer today announced the Governor signed a bill he sponsored to assist law enforcement agencies in returning firearms seized by officers. "This legislation will protect public safety and prevent gun violence by ke epmg guns out of the hands of individuals who are prohibited by law from possessing them," Lookyer said. "The bill will require law enforcement agencies to take appropriate steps to determine the legal status of an individual before reiurnning a firearm that has been seized or held as evidence by the law enforcement agency." AB 2431 by Assemblyman. Darrell Steinberg, D- Sacramento, provides a streamlined process for ensuring seized firearms are returned to owners who are legally able to possess them, and provides law enforceme agencies with policies on destroying unwanted or unclaimed weapons. nt The bill codifies the California Department of Justice's (DOJ) recommended practices, which have been adopted by most of the state's law enforcement agencies. Although current law allows law enforcement agencies to return a gun without first determining whether the individual is prohibited from possessing a firearm, the DOJ has encouraged agencies to conduct background checks on the owners and enter information about the firearms into the Automated Firearms System before returning the guns, The DOJ also encourages local agencies to establish procedures for disposing of firearms when the owner- is prohibited from having the weapon returned. Currently, the DOJ conducts about 500 background checks a month on behalf of 300 law enforcement officers seeking information before returning seized firearms to their owners. Of those background checks, the DOJ found that about 14% of the individuals seeking the return of their guns from law enforcement agencies are prohibited from owning a firearm because they are a convicted felon, have been convicted of spousal abuse, are the subject of a domestic violence restraining order, or have been deemed to have e mental condition that poses a danger to themselves or others. In contrast, about 1% of the background checks conducted on individuals seeking to purchase weapons from licensed gun dealers show the individual is prohibited from purehasiing or possessing a firearn . (MORE) 'Sep 20 2004 21:02.33 Via Fax -> 6263305545 Richard LeGarra, Chi Page 002 of 002 4 Page 2 AB 2431 11 The bill prohibits law enforcement agencies from returning firearms unless the individual has passed a firearms eligibility background check. Agencies also will be required to establish a procedure for disposing of firearms when the person from whom they are seized is prohibited from possessing them, or if the person chooses to not have the firearm returned. Under AB 2431: • Individuals seeking the return of their firearm will be required to obtain a firearms eligibility check from the DOJ before retrieving a firearm taken into custody by a law enforcement agency. • The individual will submit a request form to the DOJ that lists the serial number, model and make of each handguns the individual seeks to have returned. The individual will be charged $20 to submit the form, plus an additional $3 for each handgun to cover the costs of the background check. • The DOJ will have 30 days from receipt of the background check request to conduct the check. The DOJ will query the appropriate federal and state databases, including California's mental health, restraining order and criminal history databases. • The DOJ will enter all handgun record information into the California Automated Firearms System. • The DOJ will send a letter to the owner informing them of whether they are eligible to possess a weapon. • The individual will be required to present that letter to the law enforcement agency to either retrieve the firearm, or, if prohibited from or no longer interested in possessing the firearm, to request that the firearm be sold on consignment through a licensed gun dealer. In addition, law enforcement agencies and courts will be authorized to charge a fee for storing and transferring the firearms and to destroy firearms that are not claimed within six months after they seizure. If the firearm was reported stolen, the law enforcement agency will be required to inform the person who reported the theft that the agency has the firearm in custody. The owner will be able to claim the gun only after obtaining a background check from the DOJ. There will be no fee charged to reclaim a recovered firearm if the gun was reported stolen within five days of the theft. In 2001, Lockyer sponsored legislation authored by then Senate Republican Leader Jim Brulte, R- Rancho Cucamonga, that established the California Armed and Prohibited Program (CAPP) to identify individuals who legally purchased firearms but subsequently fell into a prohibited category and did not relinquish their firearms as required by law. Since CAPP began in July 2002, the Attorney General's Firearms Division has made more than 250 arrests and seized more than 3,600 firearms, including more than 1,000 assault weapons, from individuals prohibited by law from possessing firearms. "This program has removed guns from spousal abusers, convicted felons and others deemed to pose a danger to society," Lockyer said_ "This bill will ensure many of the guns never ever get into the hands of � dangerous individuals to begin with." WAIS Document Retrieval 12110. (a) Except as provided in subdivision (b), no towing service shall provide and no person or public entity shall accept any direct or indirect commission, gift, or any compensation whatever from a towing service in consideration of arranging or requesting the services of a tow truck. As used in this section, "arranging" does not include the activities of employees or principals of a provider of towing services in responding to a request for towing services. (b) Subdivision (a) does not preclude a public entity otherwise authorized by law from requiring a fee in connection with the award of a franchise for towing vehicles on behalf of that public entity. However, the fee in those cases may not exceed the amount necessary to reimburse the public entity for its actual and reasonable costs incurred in connection with the towing program. (c) Any towing service or any employee of a towing service that accepts or agrees to accept any money or anything of value from a repair shop and any repair shop or any employee of a repair shop that pays or agrees to pay any money or anything of value as a commission, referral fee, inducement, or in any manner a consideration, for the delivery or the arranging of a delivery of a vehicle, not owned by the repair shop or towing service, for the purpose of storage or repair, is guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable as set forth in subdivision (d). Nothing in this subdivision prevents a towing service from towing a vehicle to a repair shop owned by the same company that owns the towing service. (d) Any person convicted of a violation of subdivision (a) or (c) shall be punished as follows: (1) Upon first conviction, by a fine of not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000) or imprisonment in the county jail for not more than six months, or by both that fine and imprisonment. If the violation of subdivision (a) or (c) is committed by a tow truck driver, the person's privilege to operate a motor vehicle shall be suspended by the department under Section 13351.85. The clerk of the court shall send a certified abstract of the conviction to the department. If the violation of either subdivision (a) or (c) is committed by a tow truck driver, the court may order the impoundment of the tow truck involved for not more than 15 days. (2) Upon a conviction of a violation of subdivision (a) or (c) that occurred within seven years of one or more separate convictions of violations of subdivision (a) or (c), by a fine of not more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) or imprisonment in the county jail for not more than one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment. If the violation of subdivision (a) or (c) is committed by a tow truck driver, the person's privilege to operate a motor vehicle shall be suspended by the department under Section 13351.85. The clerk of the court shall send a certified abstract of the conviction to the department. If the violation of either subdivision (a) or (c) is committed by a tow truck owner, the court may order the impoundment of the tow truck involved for not less than 15 days but not more than 30 days Page 1 of 1 http: / /www.leginfo. ca. gov /cgi- bil,i/waisgate ?WAISdocID= 7128285796 +0 +0 +0& WAI Sacti... 1/25/2005 WAIS Document Retrieval Page 1 of 1 22850.5. (a) A city, county, or city and county, or a state agency may adopt a regulation, ordinance, or resolution establishing procedures for the release of properly impounded vehicles and for the imposition of a charge equal to its administrative costs relating to the removal, impound, storage, or release of the vehicles. Those administrative costs may be waived by the local or state authority upon verifiable proof that the vehicle was reported stolen at the time the vehicle was removed. (b) The following apply to any charges imposed for administrative costs pursuant to subdivision (a): (1) The charges shall only be imposed on the registered owner or the agents of that owner and shall not include any vehicle towed under an abatement program or sold at a lien sale pursuant to Sections 3068.1 to 3074, inclusive, of, and Section 22851 of, the Civil Code unless the sale is sufficient in amount to pay the lienholder's total charges and proper administrative costs. (2) Any charges shall be collected by the local or state authority only from the registered owner or an agent of the registered owner. (3) The charges shall be in addition to any other charges authorized or imposed pursuant to this code. (4) No charge may be imposed for any hearing or appeal relating to the removal, impound, storage, or release of a vehicle unless that hearing or appeal was requested in writing by the registered or legal owner of the vehicle or an agent of that registered or legal owner. In addition, the charge may be imposed only upon the person requesting that hearing or appear. No administrative costs authorized under subdivision (a) shall be charged to the legal owner who redeems the vehicle unless the legal owner voluntarily requests a poststorage hearing. No city, county, city and county, or state agency shall require a legal owner or a legal owner's agent to request a poststorage hearing as a requirement for release of the vehicle to the legal owner or the legal owner's agent. The impounding agency shall not require the legal owner or the legal owner's agent to produce any documents other than those specified in paragraph (3) of subdivision (f) of Section 14602.6 or paragraph (3) of subdivision (e) of Section 14602.7. The impounding agency shall not require any documents to be notarized. R http:// www. leginfo. ca. gov /cgi- bin/waisgate ?WAISdocID= 7127745704 +6 +0 +0 &WAISacti... 1/25/2005 Surrounding Police Aaency Impound /Storage Fee Survey Release Fees Impound /Storage Release 30 -Day Release Fees DUI Release Fee Azusa P. $60.00 $60.00 $178.00 Claremont P.D $124.25 $124.25 $124.25 Covina P.D $60.00 $60.00 @ Time & Motion rate El Monte P.D $120.00 $120.00 $340.00 Glendora P.D $60.00 $60.00 $60.00 Irwindale P.D $50.00 $150.00 $350.00 Ontario P.D $125.00 $125.00 $125.00 Pomona P.D $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 Monrovia P.D $90.00 $110.00 $275.00 Average Fees $87.69 $101.02 $194.03 BPPD Fees $90.00 $100.00 $250.00 BPPD $113.00 $113.00 $250.00 Recommended Fees Survey Completed by Sgt. D. Reynoso 1 -10 -05 Arjan Idnani Assistant Director of Public Works Attachments Exhibit "A" — Kenmore Avenue Vacation Exhibit "B" — Proposed Kenmore Avenue Vacation X: \JN367 \367SP.DWr .. .. __.._.. _.. _. �.. � ■ ®■ J.J. - _. _ _ ._._ ._... _. _ _ .. ... .. _.. PROPOSED KENMORE AVENUE VACATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THE SOUTHERLY 132 FEET OF THE EASTERLY 30 FEET OF LOT 29 OF VALLEY VIEW ACRES, IN THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 12, PAGES 86 AND 87 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. K1JN367lD0C U M ENT61367 EXH -B.wpd CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FEB rr BALDWIN CITY OF BALDWIN PARK STAFF a - P A.R,_K TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Sid Mousavi, Interim Chief Executive Officer DATE: February 2, 2005 SUBJECT: Approval of Ordinance No. 1256 and Resolution No. 2005 -010 Relating to Fireworks Sales Permits PURPOSE: This report requests that the City Council introduce for first reading Ordinance No. 1256 which will amend the current fireworks ordinance to ensure compliance with the City's policies for the issuance of fireworks permits and the ways in which the funds are expended. BACKGROUND: Over the past two years of fireworks sales, the City has received complaints that organizations being granted fireworks were not what they claimed to be and that funds collected by organizations were not being spent in compliance with City, guidelines. As a result of those concerns, staff has been working with the Fireworks Sub- committee made up of Mayor Pro Tem, Ricardo Pacheco and Council Member Marlen Garcia, to tighten the City's ordinance as relates to fireworks sales permits. DISCUSSION: The goal of the Sub- committee was to develop policies and procedures that would ensure that only legitimate organizations receive permits and that the fund received from the sale of fireworks are spent in the City of Baldwin Park for the purposes specified in their fireworks sales application. Ordinance No. 1256 has been structured to achieve this. The Ordinance requires groups to provide the City with identification of both the primary and secondary person responsible for the groups' financial matters. It also requires that groups file their most recent articles of incorporation or similar proof of the validity of the organization to operate in the State of California. Groups are also required to leave a deposit with the City to help guarantee that they accurately report how the funds are expended following the sale of fireworks. To report how funds are being spent, groups must provide the City with a Sale End Report indicating the amount of revenues earned from the fireworks sales and how these revenues are to be spent. This can be indicated through minutes from Board Meetings noting the organizations' Board approved plans for spending the money. In addition, the groups must file a report showing that the funds have actually been expended for the approved purposes indicated in the Sale End Report. If groups fail to make these final reports, the group's deposit will be retained by the City and the offending group will be prohibited from receiving a fireworks sales permit in the future. Resolution No. 2005 -010 is being presented to increase the fireworks sales application fee from $50 to $250. This change is being recommended as a result of the staff time necessary to review all the documentation required in the fireworks application process. This fee will only be charged to those organizations that are successfully issued permits through the lottery process. FISCAL IMPACT: There is not a fiscal impact associated with this Ordinance. However,_ Resolution No. 2005 -010 will generate an additional $2,800 annually to offset the cost of processing and reviewing the fireworks applications and year -end reports. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council 1. Introduce for first reading, Ordinance No. 1256 entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF AND ADDING SECTION 93.12 TO CHAPTER 93 OF THE BALDWINPARK MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO FIREWORKS SALES AND PERMITS; and 2. Approve Resolution No. 2005 -010, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ESTABLISHING THE CITY'S POLICY FOR THE ISSUANCE OF FIREWORKS PERMITS PURSUANT TO SECTION 93.06 OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE. ORDINANCE NO. 1256 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF AND ADDING SECTION 93.12 TO CHAPTER 93 OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO FIREWORKS SALES AND PERMITS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 93.01 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code shall be amended by adding, in the correct alphabetical order, a definition of "applicant" and "fireworks bank account" to read as follows: APPLICANT. Shall be defined as the qualified organization (as defined below) or the qualified organizations, if a joint application is filed, upon whose behalf an application for a permit (as defined below) is filed. Fireworks bank account. Shall mean an account at a financial institution within the city used solely for moneys related to the sale of safe and sane fireworks pursuant to a permit granted pursuant to this Chapter. SECTION 2. Section 93.02 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code shall be amended to read as follows: 93.02 SALE OF SAFE AND SANE FIREWORKS. No person shall sell or offer to sell any safe and sane fireworks within the city (i) without first having obtained a valid permit issued pursuant to the terms of this subchapter and (ii) without complying with all state and local laws, rules and regulations and all the conditions of approval applicable to that permit. SECTION 3. Section 93.03 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code shall be amended to read as follows: 93.03 APPLICATION FOR PERMIT; INFORMATION REQUIRED. (A) Applications for permits shall be accepted only from qualified organizations, and shall be in writing upon the form prescribed therefore by the Chief Executive Officer. A filing and processing fee as set by resolution of the City Council shall be paid at the time of filing the application. The application shall be submitted to the Business License Division on or before the first day of May of the calendar year for which a permit shall first be issued. The person named pursuant to subparagraph (3) of subsection (B) of this section 93.03, shall sign the application and certify, under penalty of perjury, it is accurate and complete. (B) The application shall contain the following information: (1) The exact location of the proposed stand, together with the written permission of the owner of the property if the property is not owned by the applicant; (2) The name and location of the principal place of business of the applicant (or applicants for joint applications), the names and addresses of the members thereof (including any minors; provided, that to assist with protection of individual privacy, to the extent permitted by law, personal identifying information contained in the application, including, but not limited to, home addresses, home /cell phone numbers and the names of minors, will not be disclosed to the public), the name and place of business of the safe and sane fireworks vendor the applicant proposes to use and whether that vendor has, within the immediately preceding five (5) years, been convicted of a violation of any laws or regulations related to safe and sane or dangerous fireworks; (3) The name of the person and an alternate to be responsible for filing all financial reports required by this Chapter. Each of those persons shall also be designated as the only individuals authorized to withdraw money from the applicant's applicable fireworks bank account; (4) A statement of the purposes for which the applicant is organized; (5) A copy of the California Secretary of State certificate approving the organization and a copy of the last annual information return filed by the organization or other similar proof of the validity of the organization to operate within California; (6) How and where the net proceeds from the sale of the fireworks are to be expended; (7) For joint applications, (i) a designation of the single qualified organization responsible for filing the reports required by Section 93.12, (ii) the written agreement between the joint applicants regarding the joint application (iii) a designation as to which of the joint applicants shall be the primary applicant and which shall be the secondary applicant; and (8) Such other information as may be required by the Chief Executive Officer. CADocuments and Settings \Kara \My Documents\Admin \Fireworkg \fireworks- 11- 22.DOC (C) No person shall file an application which knowingly contains false information. SECTION 4. Section 93.06 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code, shall be amended to read as follows: § 93.06 ISSUANCE OF PERMITS. (A) All timely filed applications for fireworks permit shall be reviewed by the Chief Executive Officer for the purpose of determining whether an applicant is qualified to hold a permit. An applicant qualifies for a fireworks permit if the following criteria are satisfied: (1) The application contains all the information required by the provisions of this subchapter; (2) The applicant is a qualified organization, as defined in this subchapter; (3) The applicant will conduct all operations in accordance with all applicable laws; (4) The safe and sane fireworks vendor proposed to be used by the applicant has not, within the immediately preceding five (5) years, been convicted of a violation of any laws or regulations related to safe and sane or dangerous fireworks; and (5) At least 50% of the net proceeds from the sale of fireworks will be expended in the city on a program or programs consistent with the veteran, patriotic, religious, civic betterment or charitable purpose for which the applicant is organized; and (B) The City Council, by resolution, shall establish the policy and procedure for the issuance of permits, to qualified applicants, for the sale of fire- works. Such policy and procedure shall be implemented by the Chief Executive Officer. (C) In the absence of an appeal filed as prescribed in this subchapter, the determination of the Chief Executive Officer with reference to the qualification of the applicants and the issuance of the fireworks permits shall be final and conclusive. SECTION 5. Subsection (1) of Section 93.10 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code shall be amended to read as follows: CADocuments and Settings \Kara \My Documents\Admin \Fireworks \fireworks- 11- 22.DOC (1) Deposits required. To ensure compliance with subsections (G) and (H) of this Section and Section 93.12, prior to issuance of any permit, the applicant shall deposit a cashier's check or cash in the amount of Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) (the "Deposit ") with the Chief Executive Officer or her /his designee. No earlier than August 31 of the calendar year for which the permit is applicable, the Deposit shall be returned to the applicant; provided, that the Chief Executive Officer has reasonably determined the applicant has complied with all the terms of the permit and this Code. SECTION 6. Subsection (A) of Section 93.11 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code shall be amended by adding to the end of that subsection the following: provided, that the stand shall not be constructed of wood or wood products ". SECTION 7. Section 93.12 is hereby added to the Baldwin Park Municipal Code to read as follows: § 93.12 REPORTING OF REVENUES AND EXPENSES. (A) No later than August 6 of the year for which the permit is applicable, the applicant shall file with the Business License Division a written report ( "Sale End Report"), which identifies the revenues and expenses relating to the sale of fireworks conducted during that year and a description of how the applicant intends to spend the revenues remaining after deduction of expenses (the "net proceeds"). Proof the proposed expenditure of the net proceeds has been officially approved by the applicant shall be submitted with the Sale End Report and could be shown by official minutes of the applicant. (B) No later than October 31 31 of the year in which the Sale End Report was required to be filed, the applicant shall file, with the Business License Division, a written report showing proof the net proceeds have actually be expended and of how the net proceeds identified in the applicant's most recent Sale End Report were actually expended, with proof the expenditure(s) were officially approved by the applicant, which could be shown by official minutes of the applicant. (C) If the applicant fails to comply with Subsection (A) of this Section, then the Chief Executive Officer shall retain Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($250.00) of the Deposit. (D) If the applicant fails to comply with Subsection (B) of this Section, then the Chief Executive Officer shall assess a fine of Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($250.00) on the applicant. The applicant will not be permitted to apply for another permit or use a permit whose term has not yet expired unless and until that fine is paid in full The fine may be collected through whatever legal and equitable means are available, including, but not limited to, rescinding a permit, CADocuments and Settings \Kara \My Documents\Admin \Firework4 \fireworks- 11- 22.DOC or requesting equitable relief to prevent the applicant from using a permit, whose term may not yet have expired. (E) The person named pursuant to subparagraph (3) of subsection (B) of section 93.03, shall sign all reports required by this section and certify, under penalty of perjury, each is accurate and complete. SECTION 8. Sections 93.04 and 93.07 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code shall be amended so that the title "Chief Executive Officer" shall replace the titles "City Manager" and "City Executive Officer," whenever either of those latter two titles appears in those sections. SECTION 9. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance, and the City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be posted or published as prescribed by law. APPROVED and ADOPTED this _ day of , 200_. Mayor Manuel Lozano ATTEST: KATHRYN TIZCARENO, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY C: \Documents and Settings \KaraWy Documents\ Admin \Firework5\fireworks- 11- 22.DOC RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -010 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ESTABLISHING THE CITY'S POLICY FOR THE ISSUANCE OF FIREWORKS PERMITS PURSUANT TO SECTION 93.06 OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE WHEREAS, at its March 27, 2002 Meeting, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1185, amending Section 93.06 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code which sets forth the procedures and guidelines for the issuance of permits to sell fireworks in the city; and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 1185, effective April 27, 2002, requires the City Council to set by resolution the policy for issuing fireworks sales permits to qualified applicants. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DOES HEREBY 'RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That, pursuant to Section 93.06(B) of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code, the policy and procedure for the issuance of permits to qualified applicants for the sale of fireworks shall be in accordance with the attached Policy For The Issuance Of Fireworks Permits, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit «A SECTION 2. That the City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of the Resolution and shall cause the same to be processed in the manner required by law. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of February 2004. MANUEL LOZANO Mayor Resolution No. 2005 -010 Page 2 ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ) I, ROSEMARY RAMIREZ, Chief Deputy City Clerk, of the City of Baldwin Park do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park at its regular meeting of the City Council on February 2, 2004, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: ROSEMARY RAMIREZ, CIVIC Chief Deputy City Clerk Resolution No. 2005 -010 Page 3 EXHIBIT A FIREWORKS PERMITS ISSUED ON A LOTTERY BASIS BY CATEGORY 1. The lottery will be drawn from all qualified organizations (as defined in Section 93.01 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code) that have submitted applications on or before the first of May and have met all application requirements. 2. All qualifying organizations will be grouped into a category based on the services they provide. Each organization will be qualified for only one ; category. The categories will be: Youth /Youth Sports Culture Service Other In the case that the category for an organization is not clearly defined as a youth /sports organization, a cultural improvement organization or a recognized service club, that organization will be included in the category deemed appropriate by staff. 3. There will be a separate drawing for each category of permitee. Permits will be issued by category in following numbers (not to exceed fourteen total permits): Youth /Youth Sports 10 Culture 2 Service 1 Other 1 The first names chosen in each category will be assigned a permit until there are no longer permits available in that group. In the event that there are not enough applicants in a group for the number of permits available, the remaining permit or permits will be allocated in a general lottery of all the applicants who did not receive permits in the group drawings. Applicants will not be moved between groups once they have been assigned. 4. Names will be chosen, at a public drawing, no later than the fifteenth day of May. Resolution No. 2005 -010 Page 4 5. All fourteen organizations will be granted permits for the sale of fireworks for the current year only. 6. A filing and processing fee of Two Hundred and Fifty Dollars ($250.00) shall be paid at the time of filing the application. Cffy COUNCIL AGENDA r F , llf IT OF L / A STAFF EP F BALDWIN TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Honorable Chairman and Members of the Commission FROM: Jack Wong, Director of Community Development and Housin DATE: February 2, 2005 SUBJECT. Approval of the Business Improvement Program (BIP) Guidelines and Program Documents PURPOSE The purpose of this report is to request City Council to consider approval of the Business Improvement Program (BIP) Guidelines and Program Documents. BACKGROUND The City of Baldwin Park is committed to neighborhood revitalization and business growth. This commitment manifests itself in the implementation of various successful revitalization efforts. A vital component to the success of these efforts is to strong public- private partnerships. To stimulate this approach, staff wishes to further enhance continued revitalization within commercial and industrial areas of the City. Regrettably, the commercial and industrial exterior structures have suffered from physical obsolescence and deteriorating conditions, and are in need of significant revitalization measures. In an effort to improve the appearance of the City's business community, the proposed Business Improvement Program (BIP), which assists in the rehabilitation of business building facades, particularly those Located in low -to- moderate income areas, will encourage aggressive private investment and economic vitality within the City's commercial and industrial areas. The "BIP" program will work in conjunction with the City's Shopping Center Improvement Committee and code enforcement efforts. DISCUSSION The purpose of the "BIP" is to provide an economic incentive to improve the physical appearance of the commercial and industrial properties located in eligible areas within the City of Baldwin Park through restoration, renovation and redesign. These businesses may be eligible to receive rebates of up to the maximum amount of $15,000 for exterior business improvements. Property owners with multiple businesses may apply for a maximum of $95,000. The rebates will represent 75% of actual construction costs. Properties located within redevelopment project areas are eligible to receive twice the rebate amount. Property owners and business tenants of commercial and industrial property located in the City of Baldwin Park are eligible to apply for assistance under one or both of the following circumstances: (1) The business is a neighborhood business that serves an area where at least 51 percent of the residents are low and moderate- income persons (2) The businesses are located within Baldwin Park's Redevelopment Project Areas The program procedures consists of three phases: (1) the Application, (2) the Construction and the (3) Post - Construction phase. During the Application Phase, basic information is gathered to begin the process of determining if the project qualifies under program guidelines. During the construction phase, staff closely monitors and inspects the construction process of the project. The Post - Construction Phase is the third phase and consists of submittal of all cost documentation and reimbursement is made to the eligible applicant. For program guidelines and documentation, see Attachment "A ". Grants will be prioritized by using the following criteria: (1) upgrading any blighted commercial or industrial building and /or structure; (2) bringing non - conforming elements into conformance with the City's municipal codes; and (3) revitalizing either block -long, multiple storefront, or corner projects. City reimbursement will occur "after" the improvements are completed and approved by the City as part of their normal permitting and inspection process, and all expenses have been verified by the Community Development Department. Reimbursement request must be accompanied with a copy of the invoice, work contract, and receipts for the completed improvement. The "BIP" is an innovative economic development tool that is intended to have considerable success across the City. The City will benefit from this program by having more viable shopping districts, increased private reinvestment, increased property values and tax assessment, and an improved City image for visitors and residents. FISCAL IMPACT This program will be funded entirely with federal CDBG funds. The funding for the program has been allocated from the following City account: ® $271,000 - Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Fund C:\WINDOWS\DesktopWaribel's Docs \Staff Reports \CommLoan rpt.doc RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Business Improvement Program (BIP) Guidelines and Program Documents ATTACHMENTS: Attachment "A" - Business Improvement Program (BIP) Guidelines and Procedures Attachment "B" — Low and Moderate Income Map Attachment "C" Redevelopment Project Areas Map REPORT PREPARED BY: Maribel Aldana, Economic Development Consultant CAWINDOWS \TEMP \CommLoan rpt.doc CAWI N DOWS\TEMP\Comm Loan rpt.doc TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ... 2- II. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION ................................. ............................... 2 III. ELIGIBLE REQUIREMENTS .................. ............ .. . .................. 2 IV. TYPES OF ELIGIBLE IMPROVEMENTS .................. ............................... 3 Building Improvements ............................................................... 3 Site Improvements ...................................... ............................... 3 V. FINANCING PROVISIONS ................................... ............................... 4' VI. OTHER PROVISIONS ....................................... ............................... 5 VII. PROGRAM PROCEDURES ............................... ............................... 6 Phases: Application .............................................. ............................... 6 Construction ...................................... ............................... .... 6 Post- Construction ..................... ............................... . ........... 7 APPENDIX Business Improvement Program (BIP) Application City Low and Moderate - Income Map City Redevelopment Areas Map City of Baldwin Park Business Improvement Program Guidelines m�m 1. PROGRAM OBJECTIVE- -he program aims to reverse -the physical and economic decline of the City's existing commercial and industrial buildings and sites located in Redevelopment project areas and in low and moderate - income areas within the City of Baldwin Park. II. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION The Business Improvement Program (BIP) has been established as an incentive to improve the physical appearance of commercial and industrial properties located in eligible areas within the City of Baldwin Park through restoration, renovation and redesign (see attached maps). These businesses may be eligible to receive rebates of up to the maximum amount of $15, 000 for exterior business improvements. Property owners with multiple businesses may apply for a maximum of $95,000. Properties located within redevelopment project areas are eligible to receive twice the rebate amount. The City of Baldwin Park has set aside a portion of their Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) allocation to fund the Business Improvement Program (BIP), III. ELIGIBLE REQUIREMENTS Property owners and business tenants of commercial and industrial property located in the City of Baldwin Park are eligible to apply for assistance under one or both of the following circumstances: A. The business is a neighborhood business that serves an area where at least 51 percent of the residents are low and moderate- income persons, and the business is able to demonstrate the boundaries of its service area. The City will determine if the area served is a low and moderate- income area. (See attached map) B. Commercial and Industrial businesses that are located within Baldwin Park's Redevelopment Project Areas (See attached map) ** Project improvements started prior to City approval of 131P application will not be eligible. City of Baldwin Park Business Improvement Program Guidelines m2® A. Building Improvements • Exterior Wall Finishes- Certain exterior repair, cleaning, painting /stucco application and certain decorative finishes • Signs = Repair /replacement of existing business signage conforming to the current sign ordinance • Doors, Windows, Security Mesh Grill and Awnings - Repair of windows and doors, installation of exterior security lighting, security mesh, and installation of new canvas awnings over windows and entries B. Site Improvements • Fencing - Correction or repair of property fencing, screening walls, and access gates • Paving - Patch, repair and slurry coat existing on -site asphalt paving, repave existing on -site asphalt, provide on -site asphalt or concrete paving to upgrade or create new parking • Parking - Provide new parking striping and handicapped signage • Trash Enclosures - Trash enclosures -will only be funded in conjunction with other exterior property improvements • Landscaping — Landscaping projects will only be funded as a complement to a fagade improvement project All Site Improvement projects require that one job be created or retained for two years after project completion for every $25,000 awarded. At least 51 % of the jobs created and /or retained must be from the Target Income Group (TIG). The TIG is a love and moderate- income person whose household income does not exceed 80% of county median household income. *Program funds may not be used for interior improvements or roof repairs. New construction and build,;ngs occupied by ineligible uses are not eligible for the program City ol'Bald�Nin Park -3� Business Improvement Program Guidelines V. FINANCING PROVISIONS ash rebates for exteri ®r buelding and -site irnproverrients lisfed above, apps ®ved by City staff will be reimbursed as follows: A. Business tenants are eligible to receive 75% of the total improvement costs, with a maximum rebate of $15,000. Property owners with multiple tenant spaces are eligible to receive 75% of the total improvement costs, with a maximum rebate of $95,000. - However, businesses located within redevelopment`project areas are eligible to receive twice the amount of rebate. For Business Tenants ■ If the total cost of business and site repairs made by the applicant totals $20,000, the City will reimburse 75% of this cost, which in this example is $15,000, the maximum rebate amount per business tenant. For Property Owner: ■ Property owners with multiple tenant spaces are eligible to receive up to a maximum rebate of $15,000 per tenant space improvement. Rebate amount cannot exceed $95,000per retail location. B. City reimbursement will occur "after" the improvements are completed and approved by the City as part of their normal permitting-and inspection process, and all expenses have been verified by the Community Development Department. Reimbursement request must be accompanied with a copy of the invoice, work contract, and receipts for the completed improvement. C. City permit fees may be included in the total improvement costs. D. After applicant has signed the CERTIFICATE OF EXPENSE and the required permits have been finalized on the improvement, the City will then process a request for the 50 % reimbursement of the authorized actual cost. E. Reimbursements shall be made directly to the Applicant within 35 days from the RELEASE OF LIENS date. F. Any expenditure that exceeds the approved grant shall be the sole responsibility of the applicant. City oi'Baldwin Park Business Fmprownient Progr�irn Guidelines —4— Vi. OTHER PROVISIONS A. All receipts, copies of cancelled checks for work completed, copies necessary permits, and proof of ownership must be submitted with the Program Application. Business tenants must have written approval from the property owner(s) before rebate check is issued. B. Projects found to be the most blighted and having the most non - conforming conditions will be given priority. C. All receipts must contain the business name and address of the licensed contractor(s) who performed the improvements. D. Signage, trash enclosures, paint/stucco colors and improvements, shall comply with applicable planning and building codes and City ordinances. E. Business owners must possess a valid City of Baldwin Park business license. F. Applicant must begin improvements within 45 days of authorization or forfeit said authorization. G. All loan recipients awarded $25,000 or more, agree to document the creation or retention of one (1) full -time job that is to be held by or made available to low- and moderate - income persons and agree to give first consideration in filling job openings to low- and moderate- income persons. H. Projects exceeding $2,000 must comply with the Davis Bacon Wage Act. The act requires contractors to pay their employees a specified minimum wage determined by the Secretary of Labor to be prevailing for similar work in any given area. City ol'Baldwin Park Business Improvement Program Guidelines M he program procedures consist of three phases. During the Application Phase, basic information is gathered to begin the process of determining if the project qualifies under program guidelines. During the Construction Phase, staff closely monitors and inspects the construction process of the project. The Post - Construction Phase is the third phase and consists of submittal of all cost documentation and reimbursement is made to the eligible applicant. APPLICATION: A. Applicants must complete an Application Form. All applicants must attach conceptual plans to the Application showing proposed project improvements. E. Consultation meetings will be arranged between the applicant and City staff to assess proposed improvements. Staff will review and provide preliminary architectural recommendations based on design and on any existing code deficiencies or violations, which are hazards to health or safety. Code violations must be corrected when requesting assistance under this program: C. The applicant shall present to City staff a preliminary cost estimate(s) from a State licensed contractor(s) or subcontractor(s). The Commercial Program staff will examine estimates for completeness and cost reasonableness. D. City-staff shall determine if proposed improvements conform to the City's design standards. Applicant will be notified in written form if their application was approved or denied. If application is approved, they will be required to submit their plans for review and approval by the Planning and Building and Safety Divisions. E. After obtaining Planning and Building and Safety approval, applicant and contractor(s) will attend a Pre - construction meeting with City staff. CONSTRUCTION: A. City staff will make periodic, informal inspections of work to assure compliance with approved design. B. Changes to the originally approved design shall require prior approval by the City. Changes to be submitted in the form of change - orders. City of Baldwin Park Business €rnprovement Program Guidelines — 6 _ POST - CONSTRUCTION: .- Once work iS coffipleted, applicant Shall sub- it detailed cost documentation, which may include all receipts, copies of cancelled checks, paid invoices for work completed and copies of necessary permits submitted in Pre - Construction Phase. B. Presentation of cost documentation will also require that the applicant sign a CERTIFICATE OF EXPENSE, which verifies that all documentation submitted is true and complete. C. City staff will make final on -site inspection to confirm improvement compliance with the improvement plans and if the required permits have been FINALIZED. D. City will then process a request for the 75% reimbursement of the authorized actual cost. Payment will be processed within 35 days from the release of liens. CONTACT INFORMATION: To learn more about this program or to obtain a Request for Approval Form, contact: City of Baldwin Park Community Development Department 14403 E. Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, CA 91706 (626) 960 -4011, extension 483 City oi'Baldwin Park Business Improvement Program Guidelines 7 Applicant Name: Mailing Address: Zip Code: Business Phone: ( ) Home Phone: ( ) Date: Business Name: Business Address: Business License Number: Assessor Parcel Number of Property to be Improved: Note: Consult your tax advisor regarding potential tax A Zip Code: Applicant Is: Sole Proprietor Partnership Corporation Owner Owner /Occupant Tenant If tenant, what is expiration date of lease? Applicant's Social Security Number or Employer Identification Number(s) Note: Consult your tax advisor regarding potential tax implications. IV. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT COSTS: ITEM COST 1. Repair /replace signage 2. Fence repair or construction 3. Exterior paint/stucco, building repair 4. Install exterior lighting 5. Repair window(s) 6. Patch, repair and slurry coat parking lot 7. Repave on -site asphalt 8. Provide new parking striping and handicapp signage 9. Landscaping/ Exterior Improvement 10. Awnings 11. Other (please describe) TOTAL 1 I C: \WINDOWS \TEMP \Comm Loan rpt.doc COMMUNITY • ' MENT COMMISSIM REGULAR MEETING — i P.M. CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL Members: Marlen Garcia, David J. Olivas, Bill Van Cleave, Vice -Chair Ricardo Pacheco and Chair Manuel Lozano ANNOUNCEMENTS PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Five (5) minute speaking time limit Cinco (5) minutos sera el limite para hablar THIS IS THE TIME SET ASIDE TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION No action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances exist. The legislative body or its staff may: 1) Briefly respond to statements made or questions asked by persons or 2) Direct staff to investigate and /or schedule matters for consideration at a future meeting. [Government Code §54954.2] ESTE ES EL PERIODO DESIGNADO PARA DIRIGIRSE AL COMISION No se podra tomar accion en algun asunto a menos que sea incluido en la agenda, o a menos que exista alguna emergencia o circunstancia especial. El cuerpo legislativo y su personal podran 1) Responder brevemente a declaraciones o preguntas hechas por personas; o 2) Dirigir personal a investigar y/o fijar asuntos para tomar en consideracion en juntas proximas. [Codigo de Gobierno §54954.21 CONSENT CALENDAR All items listed are considered to be routine business by the Commission and will be approved with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests, in which case, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. 1. MINUTES Staff recommends that the Commission approve the minutes of January 19, 2005. 2. WARRANTS AND DEMANDS Staff recommends that the Commission receive and file the report. . BUXTON COMPANY COMMUNITY ID RETAIL ANALYSIS PROPOSAL AND CONTRACT (Continued from January 19, 2005) Staff recommends that the Commission accept the Buxton Community ID Retail Analysis Proposal and approve the Agreement in the amount of $63,000. Community Development Commission Agenda - Page 2 •e! !. • ,...• CERTIFICATION I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing agenda was posted on the City Hall bulletin board not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting. Dated this 27th day of January, 2005. Rosemary M. Ramirez, CIVIC Chief Deputy City Clerk PLEASE NOTE: Copies of staff reports and supporting documentation pertaining to each item on this agenda are available for public viewing and inspection at City Hall, 2nd Floor Lobby Area or at the Los Angeles County Public Library in the City of Baldwin Park. For further information regarding` agenda items, please contact the office of the City Clerk at 626.960.4011, ext. 108 or 626.960.4011, ext. 466 or via e -mail at rramirez(a)baidwinpark.com or Inieto(a)baldwinpark.com In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the Public Works Department or Risk Management at 626.960.4011. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable staff to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. (28 CFR 34.102.104 ADA TITLE II) Community Development Commission Agenda Page 4 CITY OF BALD WIN PARK MINUTES WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 19 2005 SpLD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Council Chambers 11403 E. Pacific Avenue C` tnf ELOPMENI COMMISSION AGENDA Manuel Lozano, Chair �Q �y�o� Ricardo Pacheco, Vice -Chair Marlen Garcia, Member David J. Olivas, Member Bill Van Cle em rL Maria Contreras, City Treasurer Kathryn Tizcareno, City Clerk ' MAA KtA The COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION of the City of Baldwin Park met in REGULAR SESSION at the above time and place. ROLL CALL Present: Member Marlen Garcia, David J. Olivas, Bill Van Cleave, Vice -Chair Ricardo Pacheco and Chair Manuel Lozano Also Present: Sid Mousavi, Interim Executive Director; Stephanie' Scher, Commission Attorney; Mark Kling, Chief of Police; Hennie Apodaca, Interim Finance Director; Shafique Naiyer, Public Works Director Jack Wong, Interim Community Development & Housing Director; Manny Carrillo, Recreation and Community Services Director; Maria A. Contreras, Kathryn Tizcareno, City Clerk; and Rosemary M. Ramirez, Chief Deputy City Clerk CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Olivas requested that the following items be removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion: Item #3 — BUXTON COMPANY COMMUNITY ID RETAIL A motion was made to approve Consent Calendar Item Kos. 1- 4.(with the exception of Item No. 3) as presented, and as follows: MOTION: Vice Chair Pacheco SECOND: Chair Lozano Carried 1. MINUTES The minutes of January 5, 2005 were approved as presented: . WARRANTS AND DEMAND Commission received and filed the report. 3. BUXTON COMPANY COMMUNITY ID RETAIL ANALYSIS PROPOSAL AND CONTRACT A motion was made to continue this matter to February 2, 2005.`: MOTION: Vice Chair Pacheco SECOND: Chair Lozano: Carried 4. FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR NEW EDEVEL PMENT PROJECT AREAS CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ROSENOW SP V CEK GROUP (RSG), INC. Commission approved an Agreement with the Rosenow Spavacek Group in the amount of $19,000. Page 1 of 1 Community Development Commission Minutes Rosemary M. Ramirez, CIVIC Chief Deputy City Clerk Page 2 of 2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AGENDA FEB - 2005 ITEM NO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION CITY OF BALDWIN PARK February 2, 2005 ARRANT REGISTER NO. 613 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk 'mate Check Amount Sep 7264 BI'XBY- SIERRA CENTER, LLC RA 012204 01/25/05 306.00 Maim# General Description 65520 .JAN SUB - STATION RENT PO# Stat Contract# Invoi {_e# Invc Dt Grass Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Piet Amount B 01/17/ZI.5 306.00 0.00 306.03 GL Distribution Gross, Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 206- 36A -5010A 306. DO JAN SUB- STATION RENT Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank C1-ieck# Ctk Date Check Amount Sep 348 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD RA 012205 01/25/05 98.17 Claim# General Description 65521 EXPRESS MAIL A /C# 1021- 7854 -9 TRKG# 843267610225 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Inve Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 7- 931 - 59832 12/31/04 16.71 0.00 16.71 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 206- 39A- 5Cd50A 16.71 # 843267610225 Claim# General Description 65522 EXPRESS MAIL TRHG# 843267610155 843267610166 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 7 -920- 10555 12/24/04 52.64 0.00 52.64 , GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Or'der,# ActCd Description 226- -5220A 29.71 #843267610155 226- OOA -5220A 22.93 #843267610166 Claim# General Description 65523 #843267609894 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 7 -931 -54832 12/22/04 28.82 0.00 28.82 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 226- 00A -5220A 28.82 843267609894 Vend# Vendor Name < Remit# Payee 2397 GRC ASSOCIATES, INC. Warrant Register No. 613 Page 2 ------------------------------------- - - - --I Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep RA 012206 01/25/05 5.7501.0101 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/11/015 5,750.00 0.11 511750.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 201- 31A -5020A 958.33 CONSULTING SRV TNRU 1/1/05 202- 32A -5020A 95833 CONSULTING SRV TNRU 1/1/05 203- OfJA -5020A 958.33 CONSULTING SRV TNRU 1/1/05 204- 34A -5020A 958.33 CONSULTING SRV TNRU 1/1/05 205- 35A -5020A 958.33 CONSULTING 'SRV TNRU 1/1/015 2216- 36A -5020A 958.35 CONSULTING ;ARV TNRU 1/1/05 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR,00 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) - ---- - - - - -- - --------------- - - - -- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 6714 LAIDLAW O.P. REALTY ASSOCIATES, LL RA 012207 01/25/05 23,566.00 Claim# General Description 65525 QTR'LY PMT - AGENCY ASIST 07/01/04- 09/30/04 P0# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/25/05 23,566.00 0.00 23,566.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 226- 00A -4245A 23,566.00 OTRLY PMT 7/11'014 - 9/30/14 ------- - - - - -- - - -------------------- - - - - -- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee. -----Bank -- Chk Date Check Amount Sep 6905 OVERLAND PACIFIC & CUTLER, INC. RA 012208 01/25/05 5,485.00 Claim# General Description 65526 NOVEMBER SERVICES PO# ;tat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 00411157 11/30/04 5,495.100 01.00 5,485.000 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 20:06- 39A -5080A 5,485.00 NOV SERV CMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN' _.."w4pte COMMISSION AGFNnA 9.0 .e, To approve a contract with the Buxton Company to provide retail marketing analysis within the City. BACKGROUND /DISCUSSION: At the January 19, 2005 meeting, the City Council requested clarification between the services provided by Buxton and the services to be provided as a part of the image campaign. While the image campaign will include market research, the data collected will be swayed towards perceptions of the City, satisfaction with City services, and expectations of the City. This data will complement the information to be generated by Buxton which will consist of quantitative data that will match the spending power and shopping preferences of the City's market area specifically with nationally recognized businesses based on their spending requirements_ The proposed image campaign consultant has been contacted regarding the services Buxton is proposed to provide and agrees that the data available from Buxton will compliment the data to be collected through the image campaign. Community ID is an economic planning tool used to effectively analyze local and regional trends. The Community ID analysis will present site- specific data that will assist future project development. The analysis will provide information and deliverables that can be used to successfully attract the desired mix of business tenants to Baldwin Park, sustaining thereafter the essential goal of long -term growth. Community ID is a two -phase process: (1) Retail Potential and Retail Site Determination, 2) Identification of Retail Matches for the Site, accompanied by retail recruiting packages. The deliverables will provide data on customer purchasing habits, lifestyles, and information of trade areas and businesses. The data obtained will be further analyzed to provide specific retailer matches. A marketing package containing, specific data on the City of Baldwin Park and on the particular retail site will be mailed to each of the twenty identified Buxton Community ID Staff Report February 2, 2005 Page 2 of 3 retailers. The consultant will make the initial contact prior to City contact. Descriptions of the two Community ID phases and what they entail, follows: Phase I (Attachment "B ") — Retail Potential and Retail Site Determination: identification of the potential retail zones ® analysis of the viability for retail development in each identified zone and its trade area. Factors considered include, but are not limited to: • analysis of psychographics and demographics of households • identification of product demand and drive time trade area • analysis of existing retail and retail trends • growth plans and relevant developments • recommendation of the retail site and trade area with the most potential • discussion and approval of a site with which to proceed for retail matching Phase l l (Attachments "B ") - Identification of Retail Matches for the Site: comparison and analysis of existing similar local and regional trade areas identification of preliminary target list of matching retailers and determination of recommended list ■ research reports (household profiles, dominant household segments) ■ discussion and approval of final list of matching retailers ■ publishing of a marketing binder that can be used to attract potential tenants ® delivery of retailer specific marketing packages that can be used to market the community to the prospective retail tenant or developer The League of California Cities endorses Community ID and sponsors quarterly workshops on the program. The list of Buxton Company references includes the cities of Paramount, Perris and Lancaster among others. (Attachment "C ") • The City of Baldwin Park is eligible to receive a ten (10) percent discount if the agreement is executed prior to the expiration date of January 31, 2005. If approved by the City Council prior to January 31, 2005 the fees for this assignment will be $63,000. The funding for this analysis has been allocated from the following City accounts: 1. $34,600 - Community Development Commission /Redevelopment 2. $17,900 - Community Image Campaign (AB 1693 Funds) 3. $10,500 - Baldwin Park Chamber of Commerce (AB 1693 Funds) CAWINDOWS \Desktop \Maribel's Docs\Staff Reports \CommunityiDProposal2.doc Buxton Community ID Staff Report February 2, 2005 Page 3 of 3 I.q:xoj AEU411 HoUly"I[OW F Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Buxton Community ID Retail Analysis Proposal and Contract (Attachment "A") in the amount of $63,000. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment "A" — The Buxton Community ID Proposal and Contract Attachment "B" — Phase I- Retail Potential and Retail Site Determination — Phase I I- Identification of Retail Matches for the Site Attachment "C" — Client References REPORT PREPARED BY: Maribel Aldana, Economic Development Consultant C:\WINDOWS\Desktop\Maribel's Docs\Staff Reports\Community[DProposal2.doc C: \WINDOWS \Desktop \Maribel's Docs \Staff Reports \CommunitylDProposal2.doc Community/9 Buxton appreciates the opportunity to propose its services to the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission. The objective of this proposal is to summarize and outline the comprehensive scope of work Buxton will provide as the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission pursues its retail attraction and expansion goals. Please note that in this proposal the term "retail" is inclusive of restaurants. Utilizing data, methods and proprietary technologies developed specifically for matching retailers with communities; Buxton will assess the potential for the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission to recruit and expand its retail sector, and will identify and provide marketing packages for specific retail targets. Buxton's initial analysis of up to three (3) distinct retail locations, selected by the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission, will yield a recommendation of the site best positioned for retail recruitment. With that recommendation, the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission will make a final determination of the retail site to be selected for retail matching. Once the site for retail matching is determined, Buxton will compare the site's trade area with the established locations of individual retailers. This analysis results in a preliminary list of matched retailers. Only retailers with locations in trade areas similar to the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission's trade area will be identified as potential matches. The preliminary list is then refined by Buxton on the basis of other retail location criteria to yield a list of up to twenty (20) specific, matched retailers for the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission. Buxton will provide the list of matched retailers to the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission for review and discussion. A marketing package will be prepared for each targeted retailer. The marketing packages are intended for presentation to retailers, as well as developers, potential franchisees, or other persons in a position to support the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission's retail goals. Each marketing package is unique to the specific targeted retailer, providing compelling and precise information that demonstrates the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission's qualifications as a location. Additionally, Buxton will contact each targeted retailer on behalf of the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission. Buxton will notify the retailer that the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission has been identified as a potentially viable location. Following is an outline of the scope of work for this project. Buxton is pleased to propose its support and looks forward to identifying retail opportunities for the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission. Btrxtoir 2 communityla SCOPE OF SERVICES RETAIL POTENTIAL AND RETAIL SITE DETERMINATION 1. Establishment of retail trade areas foreach site based upon drive times 2. Analysis of the suitability of each site and its trade area. Factors considered include but are not limited to: a. Psychographic analysis of households b. Demand for retail goods and services c. Existing retail and retail trends in the trade area and surrounding region d. Site setting, situation and configuration e. Growth plans and relevant developments f. Retail goals of the community 3. Buxton recommendation of the retail site and trade area with the most potential 4. Discussion and approval of a site with which to proceed to retail matching IDENTIFICATION OF RETAIL MATCHES FOR SELECTED SITE 1. Comparison of site trade area with existing retail location trade areas 2. Identification of preliminary target list of matching retailers 3. Additional analysis of preliminary targets 4. Determination of recommended list of matching retailers 5. Discussion and approval of final list of matching retailers for which marketing packages will be prepared 8:��.� 3 a��;.�� ��.�n 4 i SCHEDULE OF SERVICE This schedule is sequential and cumulative. It is based from the day following the project launch meeting. The project launch meeting is usually a conference call between the city and Buxton teams. The project launch meeting occurs after a contract and initial payment is received, and after Buxton receives requested and necessary information from the city (such as the three sites selected for study). This schedule is nominal, and does not account for periods during which the city reviews Buxton's recommendations. The schedule does not consider additional or custom research that may be required, or other unusual circumstances. 1. Delivery of large map with sites and trade area 5 business days 2. Retail site determination 5 business days 3. Recommended list of matching retailers 5 business days 4. Retail marketing packages 15 business days Buxton agrees to complete the Community/D analysis and deliver all final reports and retail marketing packages on or before April 10, 2005, provided the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission supplies Buxton with the data related to the scope of work as defined on page 8 of this agreement no later than February 14, 2005. Additionally, the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission agrees to work in a diligent and expedient manner with Buxton to complete the site selection phase and agree upon retailer matches. BmIon u FEE FOR SERVICES The cost of Community /D is $70,000. The Baldwin Park Community Development Commission is eligible to receive a ten (10) percent discount if this agreement is executed prior to the expiration date of January 31, 2005; for a discounted price of $63,000 payable as follows: 1. $20,000 due upon execution of this agreement 2. $20,000 due on or before April 10, 2005 3. $23,000 due on or before July 15, 2005 The Baldwin Park Community Development Commission agrees to pay Buxton the pre- arranged, mutually agreed actual cosh of travel associated with services rendered. This does not include travel associated with the presentation or negotiation of this agreement. It only includes travel costs incurred by Buxton at the request of the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission; such as for a community presentation or workshop following completion of the project. For services specifically requested by the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission and performed by Buxton outside the scope of this agreement, an hourly rate of $200 will apply. For additional copies of a retailer marketing package or reference binder, a fee of $200 will apply. 6 FIN i SIGNATURE PAGE This agreement is between the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission and Buxton (the "Parties ") for the performance of services described in this proposal. The Parties agree that an independent contractor /employer relationship is created as a result of this agreement. Buxton will not be considered an agent or employee of the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission for any purpose. The term of this agreement is one (1) year. This agreement may be terminated by either party at any time upon written notice of thirty (30) days. If this agreement is terminated, Buxton will be paid for services performed up to the date the written notice is received. ` Agreed and accepted this day of 200_. Baldwin Park Community Development Commission 14403 Cast Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, CA 91.706 (Signature) *For signature, please see Consultant Services Agreement The Buxton Company 2651 S. Polaris Drive Fort Worth, TX 76137 (Signature) Buxrorr a. 7 CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission, a public body, corporate and politic, (hereinafter referred to as the "CDC ") and, THE BUXTON COMPANY, a Texas corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Contractor "), collectively referred to herein as the Parties. RECITALS. This Agreement is made and entered into with respect to the following facts: a. CDC has considered the Community ID Proposal, dated January 10, 2005 (the "Proposal "), from the Contractor for professional services including but not limited to, providing the services as described below in Section 1 of this Agreement. b. Contractor is qualified to provide such services and Contractor has agreed to perform such services, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. SECTION 1. SERVICES. The CDC's intent is to provide an in- depth retail marketing analysis for purposes of identifying business attraction and expansion opportunities within the City of Baldwin Park. Contractor will diligently perform the tasks in a good and workmanlike manner, which is more specially identified in the Scope of Services (Exhibit "A "), unless otherwise instructed in writing by the CDC. SECTION 2. TERM. a. This Agreement shall commence on January 19, 2005, and shall expire upon satisfactory completion of the Scope of Services (as defined below), unless the Parties agree in writing to extend this Agreement; provided, that the parties anticipate the services being completed on or before January 19, 2006 (the "Expiration Date "), after commencement. b. Contractor shall devote such time to the performance of services pursuant to the Agreement as may be reasonably necessary for the satisfactory performance of Contractor's obligations pursuant to this Agreement. SECTION 3. PERFORMANCE. a. Contractor shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of its principal's abilities, experience and talents, perform all tasks described in this Agreement. 1 b. Contractor shall perform all tasks and responsibilities described in the Scope of Services (Exhibit "A"). Contractor agrees to complete the analysis and deliver all final reports and retail marketing packages on or before April 10, 2005, provided the CDC supplies Contractor with data related to the Scope of Services as defined in the Project Requirements (Exhibit "B") no later than February 14, 2005. CDC further complies to work diligently and expediently with Contractor on all appropriate processes during the scope of services in order for Contractor to meet the April 10, 2005 deadline. C. Contractor shall be knowledgeable of and subject to all CDC rules and regulations, standard operating procedures and the supervisory chain of command. SECTION 4. WORK PRODUCT. Contractor hereby agrees all work products produced pursuant to this Agreement shall be the sole property of CDC and ownership of said work products shall be retained by CDC. Contractor shall provide those products within ten (10) days after a written request from CDC. Contractor may retain copies of those work products. Contractor shall render no extra services beyond the Scope of Services described under this Agreement unless such extra services first shall have been duly authorized in writing by the Executive Director (the "ED") of CDC. Additional services shall be subject to terms agreed to in writing by the CDC and Contractor. • IMTZMM The ED or his/her designee shall have the right of general supervision of all work performed by Contractor. No payment for services rendered under this Agreement shall be made without the prior approval of the ED or his/her designee. SECTION 7. PAYMENT. a. Fees for services shall be paid in accordance with the Proposal with a deposit in the amount of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) to be paid to the Contractor upon execution of this agreement, an additional twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) to be paid to Contractor upon completion of Section 3b due on or before April 10, 2005, and the final payment in the amount of twenty-three thousand dollars ($23,000-00) due on or before July 15, 2005. For satisfactory completion of the services described in Exhibit A, CDC agrees to pay Contractor a fee not to exceed sixty-three thousand dollars ($63,000.00). b. Contractor shall not be entitled to any additional benefits such as health insurance, uniform allowance, retirement benefits, sick leave or vacation. 2 C. Contractor shall provide an itemized bill to CDC before payment request for work completed for that period. The total amount of fees billed and paid shall not exceed the maximum set forth in 7.a., above, unless otherwise approved in writing by the Parties. Payment is due within thirty (30) days after approval of the bill by CDC. d. CDC shall not be required to make any payment until the insurance documents described in Section 12 have been submitted by Contractor and approved by CDC's general counsel. CDC shall have the right to terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, for any reason, with thirty-days' (30-days) written notice. Termination shall become effective thirty (30) days after delivery of written notice to Contractor. In the event CDC does not exercise the right to terminate as set forth herein, the Agreement shall automatically terminate on the Expiration Date. SECTION 9. NON-LIABILITY OF OFFICIALS AND EMPLOYEES OF THE CDC. No official or employee of CDC shall be personally liable to Contractor in the event of any default or breach by CDC or for any amount, which may become due to Contractor. SECTION 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. Contractor is and shall at all times remain, as to CDC, a wholly independent Contractor. Neither CDC nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Contractor except as expressly set forth in this Agreement. Contractor shall not at any time or in any fashion represent Contractor is in any manner an officer, employee or agent of CDC. No employee benefits shall be available to Contractor in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except as provided in this Agreement, CDC shall. not pay salary, wages or other compensation to Contractor for performance hereunder for CDC. CDC shall not be liable for compensation to Contractor for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. SECTION 11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. Contractor shall at all times observe and comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, codes and regulations of the federal, state and local governments including, but not limited to, the Baldwin Park Municipal Code. CDC and its appointed or elected officers, employees or agents shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of Contractor to comply with this section. 3 SECTION 12. INDEMNIFICATION. Contractor agrees to and shall defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless CDC, the City of Baldwin Park and each of their elected and appointed boards, officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers (the "Indemnified Parties") from and against any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, defense costs, civil penalties, expenses, causes of action, judgments at law or in equity or liability of any kind or nature ("Claims") which the Indemnified Parties may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injuries or deaths of persons or damage to property arising out of Contractor's performance related to this Agreement. This section does not apply to liability arising out of the sole negligence of any of the Indemnified Parties. A copy of a certificate of insurance insuring Contractor and an endorsement naming the Indemnified Parties as additional insureds shall be provided for reasonable approval by CDC's general counsel. 6-1 Contractor shall obtain and maintain at its expense, during the term of this Agreement, all necessary insurance for its employees engaged in the performance of this Agreement, including, but not limited to worker's compensation insurance. Contractor shall obtain and maintain at its expense, during the term of this Agreement, comprehensive general liability insurance with coverage of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) combined single limit per occurrence (and not "claims made") for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. Contractor shall cause City, CDC, its officers, employees, and agents, to be named as an additional insured on said policy and shall obtain a waiver of the insurer's right of subrogation against City and CDC. Contractor shall obtain and maintain professional liability (errors and omissions) insurance in an amount of not less $1,000,000.00. Contractor shall provide City with written proof of the existence of such insurance and the commitment of the insurance carrier (either by policy endorsement or similar agreement) to notify City in writing 30 days before any reduction in coverage or the cancellation of such insurance. SECTION 14. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between CDC and Contractor related to the Scope of Services discussed herein and any prior agreements, promises, negotiations or representations not expressly set forth herein regarding that work are of no force or effect. Subsequent modifications to this Agreement shall be effective only if in writing and signed by each party. If any term, condition or covenant of this Agreement is held by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or 4 unenforceable, then the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall be valid and binding. SECTION 15. WAIVER. Waiver by any party hereto of any term, condition or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute the waiver of any other term, condition or covenant hereof. SECTION 16. BINDING EFFECT, This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the successors of each of the Parties hereto. SECTION 17. GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement shall be interpreted and construed according to the laws of the State of California and venue shall be in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. SECTION 16. ATTORNEY'S FEES. If litigation is reasonably required to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, then the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to an award of reasonable attorney's fees in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled. SECTION 19. NOTICE. All notices shall be personally delivered or mailed to the addresses listed below: "CONTRACTOR The Buxton Company 2651 S. Polaris Drive Fort Worth;.TX 76137 Attn: Patricia Bell, Territory Business Manager "CDC" Baldwin Park Community Development Commission Attn: Executive Director 14403 East Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, CA 91706 SECTION 2. ASSIGNMENT. Neither party may assign any right or obligation under this Agreement without the express written approval of the other party; provided that CDC may assign its rights and obligations to the City of Baldwin Park. 5 Exhibit "A" Scope of Services Contractor shall provide an in -depth retail marketing analysis for purposes of identifying business attraction and expansion opportunities within the City of Baldwin Park. The Contractor will be responsible for performing all required services, generating all documents and participation in all relevant processes including but not Limited to: ■ the identification of the potential retail zones analysis of the viability for retail development in each identified zone and its trade area. Factors considered include but are not limited to: o analysis of psychographics and demographics of households o identification of product demand and drive time trade area o analysis of existing retail and retail trends o growth plans and relevant developments recommendation of the retail site and trade area with the most potential discussion and approval of a site with which to proceed for retail matching ■ comparison and analysis of existing similar local and regional trade areas ■ identification of preliminary target list of matching retailers and determination of recommended list ■ research reports (household profiles, dominant household segments) discussion and approval of final list of matching retailers ® publishing of a marketing binder that can be used to market to potential tenants ■ delivery of retailer specific marketing packages that can be used to market the community to the prospective retail tenant or developer ■ presentations, as requested, before the City Council, CDC, Planning Commission and community groups 1 The scope of work shall be prepared and processed pursuant to the requirements of the State of California Community Redevelopment Health and Safety Code, Section 33000 et. seq. Exhibit "B" Project Requirements In order to effectively engage and complete the scope of work, the following is requested by The Buxton Company ( "The Contractor") - - Project Liaison The City of Baldwin Park ( "The City ") will designate a project manager who will serve as Contractor's primary contact during the project. Information and Reports • Logo (electronic version) • Addresses and description information for up to three (3) sites that will be evaluated • Current traffic count data • Digital street data • List of major, national or regional retailers present in the community • List of planned retail, either proposed or in development, in the community • List of planned residential developments • Housing start information Zoning and comprehensive plan documents • General community marketing data and reports communitylu SCOPE OF SERVICES RETAIL POTENTIAL AND RETAIL SITE DETERMINATION 1. Establishment of retail trade areas for -each site based upon drive times 2. Analysis of the suitability of each site and its trade area. Factors considered include but are not limited to: a. Psychographic analysis of households b. Demand for retail goods and services c. Existing retail and retail trends in the trade area and surrounding region d. Site setting, situation and configuration e. Growth plans and relevant developments f. Retail goals of the community 3. Buxton recommendation of the retail site and trade area with the most potential 4. Discussion and approval of a site with which to proceed to retail matching IDENTIFICATION OF RETAIL MATCHES FOR SELECTED SITE 1. Comparison of site trade area with existing retail location trade areas 2. identification of preliminary target list of matching retailers 3. Additional analysis of preliminary targets 4. Determination of recommended list of matching retailers 5. Discussion and approval of final list of matching retailers for which marketing packages will be prepared n 3 b . - DHarir�y Q- Buxton Community ID Staff Report February 2, 2005 Page 6 of 3 7d to�mry,� Communi ID References 2004 City of Deittoii TX City of li!iil Cieelc, WA Linda Ratliff Robert Stowe - Director of Economic Development City Manager 100 West Oak, Suite 10I 15728 Mill Creek Boulevard _ ......__ Denton, TX 76201 Mill Creek, WA 98012 (940) 349 -8305 (425) 921 -5724 ibratliff@cityofdenton.com bob @city ofmillcreek.corra City of Duncanville. TX City of New BMaiimfeLs, Earle Jones - Mike Meek Director of Economic Development President 203 E. Wheatland Road Greater New Braunfels Chamber of Commerce Duncanville, TX 75138 390 South Seguin (972) 780 -5093 New Braunfels, TX 78131 ejones @ci.duncaoville.tx.us (830) 625 -0441 meeK(a),newtsraunteischamber.com City of Garv. IN Ben Clement Clty of Pammoug, CA Director of Economic Development Patrick West, City Manager 504 Broadway, Suite 625 Joe Perez, Community Development Director Gary, IN 46402 16400 Colorado Avenue (219) 881 -5235 Paramount, CA 90723 ben—clement-99@yahoo.com - (562) 220 -2225 . City of Perris. CA City of Ketler, T% Michael McDermott Woody Mitchell Director, Real Estate and Development Director of Economic Development 101 North "D" Street I 100 Bear Creek Parkway Perris, CA 92570 K ciicr, xT"n 'v`L2 + (909) 943 -6100 ext 245 (817) 7434020 mmcdermott@perris- ca_org wmitchell@cityofkeller.com City of Richland. WA City of Lancaster, CA Rita Mazur Mark Bozigian (pronounced Bo 'zeegin) Council Member Assistant to the City Manager 505 Swift Boulevard 44933 Fern Avenue Richland, WA 99352 Lancaster, CA 93534 (509) 942 -7390 (661) 723 -6030 rmazur@ci.richland.wa.us mbozigian @cityoflancasterca.org - City of Shoretuae, WA City ofilcl{iiinev. T3a�' .fan K- Knudson John Kessel Economic Development City Manager's Office Director of Development Services 17544 Midvale Avenue North 222 North Tennessee Shoreline, WA 98133 McKinney, TX 75070 (206) 546 -0959 (972) 547 -7402 jknudsoa@ci.shoreline.wa.us- jkessel@mckinneytexas.org Development • • Mi Jack Wong, Director of Community Development and Housing February 2, 2005 SUBJECT: Continued from January 19, 2005; Conceptual review by the Community Development Commission for a proposed twelve (12) unit single- family detached planned development and common lot located within the Ol, Office Industrial Zone (Sierra Vista Redevelopment Project Area); Location: 819 Frazier t.; Case No.: PR 04 -34; Applicant: D. C. Corporation. PURPOSE This item is before you for conceptual review only. Should the Commission approve this project in concept, the applicant must still obtain all necessary City permits, approvals and /or entitlements, as they apply in proceeding with the project development. This report requests conceptual denial by the Community Development Commission for a proposed single family detached planned development with common lot. This property is located within the Sierra Vista Redevelopment Project Area and the Redevelopment Plan requires that any new construction be reviewed and conceptually approved by the Redevelopment Agency prior to the issuance of any building permits. CEQ The Planning Division has completed an environmental analysis of the project and has recommended that the City Council issue a negative declaration. That consideration will be made by the City Council the night this matter is heard by the Commission. SUBJECT PROPERTY The subject property has a current General Plan Land Use designation of Single - Family Residential and is inconsistently zoned OI, Office Industrial. The property is irregular in shape and contains approximately 31,887square feet (.73 acres) of net area. The total site area is essentially flat and contains an existing single- family residence, which will eventually be demolished. The adjacent zoning and land uses are listed in the table below. Conceptual Approval PR 04-34 Page 2 of 3 Table 1 Adjacent Zoning & Land Use Adjacent Property Location Zoning Property Use North 1-10 FWY San Bernardino Freeway South R-1 Single-Family Residences East R-1 Single-Family Residences West Athol St. Overpass — R-1 Single-Family Residences 170 RIN i 0 .- t This conceptual review request is for the construction of a twelve (12) unit single-family detached planned development and common lot. In order for the development to take place, the applicant has requested approval by the City Council to redesignate and rezone the property from single-family residential to multi-family residential. These entitlement requests, which also include an additional zone change to add the planned development overlay, a zone variance to allow less than the minimum required amount of guest parking spaces and a tentative tract map, will be heard by the City Council on February 2, 2005. The requested General Plan amendment does not compliment the subject properties nor is the proposed zoning in compliance with the newly updated General Plan without such an amendment. The zone change will also create a situation that is called "spot zoning", in that a small area of land will be zoned in a manner incompatible with the immediate R-1 zoned and single-family residential designated properties surrounding it. Therefore, staff is recommending that the General Plan amendment and zoning requests, to be heard by the City Council, be denied based on incompatibility with the adjacent single-family residential uses. At the December 16, 2004 Planning Commission Meeting, the Commission recommended that the City Council deny all requested entitlements for the proposed development. Some of the Commission concerns were as follows: - Potential unsafe traffic conditions as a result of the entrance to the project being in close proximity to the Frazier St. off ramp. - Deficient in guest parking spaces. - Density is too high. - Limited amount of usable private open space. If the City Council denies the General Plan amendment and zone change, the conceptual approval should be denied by the Commission, as the necessary finding of consistency with the General Plan and zoning cannot be made. Conceptual Approval PR 04 -34 Page 3 of 3 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Community Development Commission adopt Resolution No: 408 entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ADOPTING THE FINDINGS OF FACT AND DENYING THE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW PROPOSAL FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TWELVE (12) UNIT SINGLE- FAMILY DETACHED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT LOCATED WITHIN THE SIERRA VISTA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA; LOCATION: 819 FRAZIER STREET; CASE NO: PR 04 -34; APPLICANT: D.C. CORPORATION ". FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the proposed improvements will not be compatible with the standards and other requirements set forth in the Sierra Vista Redevelopment Plan and the design proposed by the Commission in that the proposed development is not consistent with the City's General Plan, or the existing zoning on the site. Proposed changes to those standards are not compatible with the surrounding single- family residential zoning designations and uses; and 2. That the proposed improvements would require a modification in design features in order to meet the requirements of the Sierra Vista Redevelopment Plan and the Design Guidelines for the Sierra Vista Redevelopment Project Area to comply with the permitted density of development; and 3. That the Applicant has not entered into an agreement with the Commission for the development of said improvements. ATTACHMENT #1 Vicinity Map #2 Resolution No. 408 Report Prepared By: Salvador Lopez Jr., Assistant Planner RESOLUTION NO. 408 A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ADOPTING THE FINDINGS OF FACT AND DENYING THE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW PROPOSAL FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TWELVE (12) UNIT SINGLE - FAMILY DETACHED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT LOCATED WITHIN THE SIERRA VISTA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA; LOCATION: 819 FRAZIER STREET; CASE NO.: PR 04 -34; APPLICANT: D.C. CORPORATION. WHEREAS, the property described herein is located within the Sierra Vista Redevelopment Project Area and the Redevelopment Plan requires that any new construction be reviewed and conceptually approved by the Community Development Commission prior to the issuance of any building permits; and WHEREAS, an application ( "Application ") for Design Review was submitted on behalf of the owners of certain real property, located at 819 Frazier Street in the City of Baldwin Park; and WHEREAS, the Design Review Application is requesting conceptual approval to allow the construction of a twelve (12) unit single - family detached planned development, pursuant to the Sierra Vista Redevelopment Plan. THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the Community Development Commission of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby find, determines, and declare as follows: a) That an application for Design Review was submitted on behalf of the owners of certain real property, located at 819 Frazier Street in the City of Baldwin Park, described more particularly in the Application on file with the Planning Division; and b) That the Design Review application is requesting conceptual approval to allow the construction of a twelve (12) unit single - family detached planned development, pursuant to _ the Sierra Vista Redevelopment Plan; and c) That on February 2, 2005, the Community Development Commission, based upon evidence presented including applicable staff reports and each member of the Commission being familiar with the properties, it was determined that the facts as required by the Sierra Vista Resolution 403 Page 2 Redevelopment Plan, for the granting of such Applications are present and that the Design Review proposal should be denied. SECTION 2. That the Design Review proposal, as herein described be and the same hereby is approved subject to the following findings. a) That the proposed improvements will not be compatible with the standards and other requirements set forth in the Sierra Vista Redevelopment Plan and the design proposed by the Commission in that the proposed development is not consistent with the City's General Plan, or the existing zoning on the site. Proposed changes to those standards are not compatible with the surrounding single - family residential zoning designations and uses; and b) That the proposed improvements would require a modification in design features in order to meet the requirements of the Sierra Vista Redevelopment Plan and the Design Guidelines for the Sierra Vista Redevelopment Project Area to comply with the permitted density of development; and c) That the Applicant has not entered into an agreement with the Commission for the development of said improvements. SECTION 3. This conceptual denial shall not constitute approval by the Community Development Commission of any funding of or monetary participation in this project, nor shall it be deemed to be a waiver by the Community Development Commission of any right or power, which is otherwise available to the Commission. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and forward a copy hereof to the Secretary Of the Community Development Commission and the Applicant. PASSED AND APPROVED this 2nd day of February 2005. MANUEL LOZANO, CHAIR Resolution 403 Page 3 ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA } COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) SS. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ) I, ROSEMARY RAMIREZ, Chief Deputy City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution 408 was duly and regularly approved and adopted by the Community Development Commission of the City of Baldwin Park at a regular meeting thereof, held on February 2, 2005 by the following vote: AYES: MEMBER: NOES: MEMBER: ABSENT: MEMBER: ABSTAIN: MEMBER: ROSEMARY RAMIREZ, CIVIC CHIEF DEPUTY CITY CLERK PURPOSE This item is before you for conceptual review only. If the Agency Board approves this project in concept, the applicant must still obtain all necessary City permits, approvals and /or entitlements, if they intend to proceed with project development. This report requests conceptual review by the Community Development Commission for the proposed development of a fast food restaurant with a drive -thru encompassing approximately 1,660 square feet of floor area. The property is located within the Central Business District Redevelopment Project Area and the Plan for that redevelopment area requires that any new construction be reviewed and conceptually approved by the Community Development Commission prior to the issuance of any building permits. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MEETING OF JANUARY 19, 2005 At the Community Development Commission meeting on January 19, 2005, the members briefly discussed the project and were concerned about the proliferation of `Hamburger Restaurants', especially since the proposed restaurant is adjacent to Maine Burger. Since that meeting, the Applicant has resubmitted for design review and addressed all of the Design Review Committee's comments. Furthermore, the floor area of the building has been reduced to accommodate the amount of parking stalls required for the use (reference the discussion below ). Staff also contacted the Applicant and inquired about the type of restaurant. The Applicant, Mr. Nabih, indicated that the business will be `family owned' as opposed to a national chain. Mr. Nabih also stated that4he restaurant's menu will encompass a variety of food, including chicken dishes, gyros, Italian and Mediterranean cuisines. PR 04-59 February 2, 2005 4312 Maine Avenue Paqe 2 On November 16, 2004, the Applicants submitted a design review package to the Planning Division encompassing site plans, elevation plans and conceptual landscaping plans for a proposed fast food restaurant with a drive-thru at 4312 Maine Avenue. Plans were distributed to City departments /divisions including Police, Building, Engineering and the County Fire Department for comment. SUBJECT PROPERTY There are two (2) properties that encompass the total project site. Overall the properties contain approximately 12,232 square feet of area and are located on Maine Avenue. The General Plan designation on the subject property is Neighborhood Commercial and is consistently zoned C-1, Neighborhood Commercial. This zoning designation allows for lower intensity commercial uses that residents in neighborhoods commonly frequent (i.e. clothing stores, restaurants, bakeries). SITE DESIGN According to the plans submitted for design review, the applicant is proposing to locate a fast food restaurant with a drive-thru totaling approximately 1,539 square feet of floor area. The proposed restaurant will seat 36 patrons inside, and have a drive-thru vehicular stacking area for approximately six (6) automobiles. The total number of parking stalls provided throughout the site is sixteen (16), which meets the current Zoning Code requirements. Since the reduction in floor area was to the rear of the building, the elevations along the street side will remain the same as presented before. The improvements proposed exhibit a Spanish Mediterranean architectural theme that includes stucco-covered elevations with stone veneer along the lower portion of the elevations. A cornice line dominates the top of the walls while the primary entries include an architectural popout. There is also a popout which accentuates the drive-thru pick up window along the north elevation. The concrete roof tile is a curved variety which is a reddish, orange color. Green awnings are proposed above the entry doors along Maine Avenue. Exterior architectural lighting is proposed along the elevations. Decorative hardscape is utilized along the outdoor pedestrian walkways around the building. DESIGN REVIEW The Design Review Committee has reviewed the Applicant's resubmittal and tentatively approved the project. CEQA The project has been reviewed by Planning Division staff in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and it has been determined that the project proposal is Categorically Exempt pursuant to Section 15303, Class 3 Subsection c of the CEQA Guidelines. C:\Amy\AMY\WORD\Reports\Agency Reporls\RDA Reports\4312 Maine.doc PR 04 -59 February 2, 2005 4312 Maine Avenue Pape 3 Staff recommends that the Community Development Commission conceptually approve the design review proposal of a 1,539 square foot fast food restaurant with a drive thru located within the Central Business District Redevelopment Project Area. (Applicant: Emad Nabih and Tahany Iskander; Location: 4312 Maine Avenue; Case Number 04 -59). ATTACHMENTS #1 Vicinity Map #2 Site Plan and Elevations REPORT PREPARED BY: Amy L. Harbin, Principal Plannt C:\Amy\AMY\WORD \ReportsWgency Reports \RDA Reports \4312 Maine.doc ■ 1" i a r r r r r r r r r 0 r r r r r r r r s r r r r r r r r r Scale bject Properlym PLANNI E)IVISICPN 4258 :11441q 14420 14496 14508 494A Scale bject Properlym PLANNI E)IVISICPN Q�z Vicinity Map Conceptual Approval CASE i 0, ADDRESS-J D. January ,., Scale i 38_7„ 0- -III II II II II III tll II II II II Ilr- � � ---- _____ II II II II II Ili- III II II II II II - - - - - - -- L J)— - - - - - -� I I I I II I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I iI L I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II S A L E S A R E A ` I ----------- I / t I / I ® I i / G O O< I N G A R E A - 'I GI I —\ ------ - - - - -- --- / rn A 1 z / PAY PHONE z / rn 20 m 20 r I N m A rn -LX-j Lxi= re y= Mz I ➢z I �� Z I I x L - - -� 38,_x„ uj -14 ( r m Ul -(r- > TT Ili D j5 4. -a ('% 0 r Q!y 1 m X 0 (ffi -1 > low —>, r 0 r> r- (p k) m --I - udo a ci (3 13 > Z Q% > > 6 - > :K z UN 13 -4 tj (p < > O>Z -i m ZOID > z ri > F rrtri_z M m Lo z , m > Z TR 0 m r r ul A ;a m > z m O IN" m F, Cil z A T- m r IV- ra < CD :1110:1613t This item is before you for conceptual approval only. If the Commission approves this project in concept, the applicant must still obtain all necessary City permits, approvals and /or entitlements, including approval from the Los Angeles County Fire Department, as they apply in proceeding with the project development. In this case, the applicant must obtain approval from the Los Angeles County Fire Department Petroleum Chemical Division prior to obtaining a City permit from the Building Division. This report requests conceptual approval by the Community Development Commission for the installation of an outdoor above ground carbon dioxide tank in an Industrial Business Park within the 1, Industrial Zone. This property is located within the San Gabriel River Redevelopment Project Area and the Redevelopment Plan requires that any new construction be reviewed and conceptually approved by the Commission prior to the issuance of any building permits. As required by the Building Division, the applicant will obtain approval from the Los Angeles County Fire Department before the issuance of a city permit. MERIAO-V In accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an environmental analysis has been completed for this case. As a result of that assessment, it has been determined that this case will not have a significant impact upon the environment, and is Categorically Exempt. SUBJECT PROPERTY The subject property is located on the southeast corner of Live Oak Avenue and Stewart Avenue. Overall, the site is irregular in shape and contains approximately Conceptual Approval 5100 Rivergrade Road Page 2 of 2 85,813 square feet (2 acres) of land, which is part of a greater and overall Industrial Business Park. The General Plan land use designation of the subject property is General Manufacturing and the zoning designation is 1, Industrial. The closest residential structure and zoning is approximately 1000 feet southeast of the site, while the nearest school building (Olive Junior High School) is approximately 2000 feet south of the site. a- &�* ► The applicant, Robert Willits, representing New York Frozen Foods Inc., is requesting approval to install an outdoor above ground carbon dioxide tank within the existing parking area. According to the site plan and elevations, the new tank will measure 24' high with a 9' diameter and be placed on a foundation surrounded by an 8' high security fence. An aboveground valve from the tank to the building will transport the carbon dioxide supply into the building. The tank will be visually screened from the public right- of-way by a 30' plus mature tree located within an existing landscaped planter. The proposed change will not directly affect the number of available on-site parking spaces required for the facility as the site provides more than the minimum required amount of on-site parking spaces. According to the applicant, the carbon dioxide will be used for processing frozen foods. The new tank will not emit fumes or odors that could be considered objectionable, detrimental or incompatible with the surrounding land uses. Enclosed as Attachment #3 is a Materials Safety Data Sheet provided by the applicant identifying safety information about carbon dioxide refrigerated liquid. According to the document, this product does not contain toxic chemicals nor does it contain any ingredients known to the State of California to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity. Although the liquid is non-flammable, the cylinder may vent rapidly or rupture violently from pressure when involved in a fire situation. . The proposed facility will not result in conditions or circumstances contrary to the public health, safety and the general welfare. The City's Design Review Committee has tentatively approved the project. Prior to issuing a city permit the applicant must obtain approval from the Los Angeles County Fire Department Petroleum Chemical Division. Staff recommends that the Redevelopment Agency conceptually approve the installation of an outdoor above ground carbon dioxide tank for the business located at 5100 Rivergrade Road. ATTACHMENTS #1 -Vicinity Map #2 - Site Plan and Elevation #3 — Material Safety Data Sheet Report Prepared by: Salvador Lopez Jr., Assistant Planner J�_ 5101 13700 13800 5150 5175 0 �o Gz Cl) Z f � s ® m °s ArA Z BOC GASES MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET Pt Q UCT NAME. -, CAR- D.IOXIDE : E-MGEF TED 1. 'Product and Company Identification HOC Gases, BOC Cases Division of, Division of The BCD£' Group, Iae. HOC Canada Limited 575 Mounttaio Avenue 5975 FafWurne Street, Unit 2 Murray tilt, N3 07"4 Mississauga, Ontario LSR 3W6 TELEPHONE ?NUMBER: (908) 464 -8100 TELEPHONE NUMBER: ('905) 501 -1700 24-HOUR EMERGENCY TELEPHONE NUMBER: 24 -HOUR EMEEdUi ?NCY TIELEPHONE NUMBER: CHEMTREC (800) 424 -9300 (w-)) 5t)t -0 tt12 EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN NO: 2 -0101 PRODUCTNAME: CARB©NDIOXTDE,REFRIGERA =LIQI -TILT CHEMICAL NAME: Carbon Dioxide COMMON NAMEStSY NONY MS: C:arbnnic Anhydride, Ref —rigerasted Liquid TDC (Canada) CLASSIFICATION: 2.2 WHMISCLASSIFICATION: A PREPARED BY: Loss Cosltrol (908y464- 81001(905)501 - 1700 PREPARATION DATES: 6 /1195 REVIEW DATES: 06/18/04 2. Composition, information on ingredients E:kPGSLIRE LIMITS': ' 1teCce to indi4idiial slate os provincial r�uialintrv, ns ag+Plia�i +le, f'ryr li�nilx which. uaw}' Ae n� n +e xLruogerd. Ihai+ tli��.yr listed here. As stated in L C'R 1910,.Subpart 7 (ruvixud July i, 1993) As atatrd in the A011H 2004 llu-eAhold Limit Values for C.hmnicat SkiltatAmeea and Physical Agentu. OSHA Rcgulatoly Status: This inattnial is classified as liazarE ous rindor OSt [A regii1ations. 3. Hazards identification SIDS: G -99 Revised: 06118/04 Page 1 a1''7 = RasaE�iS' ears= :. Carbon bloxide 99.8 TO 99.999 5000 pp m-. TWA- 5000 ppm TWA Not Available FORMULA: CQZ 30000 ppm STEL CAS: 124 -38 -9 RTECS #: FF6400000 ' 1teCce to indi4idiial slate os provincial r�uialintrv, ns ag+Plia�i +le, f'ryr li�nilx which. uaw}' Ae n� n +e xLruogerd. Ihai+ tli��.yr listed here. As stated in L C'R 1910,.Subpart 7 (ruvixud July i, 1993) As atatrd in the A011H 2004 llu-eAhold Limit Values for C.hmnicat SkiltatAmeea and Physical Agentu. OSHA Rcgulatoly Status: This inattnial is classified as liazarE ous rindor OSt [A regii1ations. 3. Hazards identification SIDS: G -99 Revised: 06118/04 Page 1 a1''7 - - - - - - - - - - Let] 'CAPBON I - DE � REFRiGERATE.D;LtQiJ[DL-.' - '-*.:�.-L- :--7-.*-.: ...-.-.*. *.-! ..... [�RRODQNM VTAIE; ROUTE OF ENTRY: Skirt Contact Skin Absorption Eye Ctmtact Trihalation Ingestion yes No yes Y09 No I I. I ZVI am Is it niniNrAW-ka Exposure Limits Irritant Sensitimtion Yes No No Teraiogen Reproductive Hazard M-utagen No No NO Synergistic Effects None reported ('arcinogenicity- - NTP: No TARO: No OSHA- No EYE EFFECTS: Contact with evaporatiaig liquid may cause frostbite. SKIN EFFECTS: Contact with liquefied Product may cause frostbite upon evaporation. Frostbite effects area change in color of dic skin to gray or while: possibly fulluwod by bliswring. Skin inay becow-c inflatriod and painful. INGESTTON EFFECTS: Ingestion is unlikely, Contact with liquid may cause frostbite. INHALATION EFFECTS: Depending on concentration and duration of exposure carbon dioxide may cause increased rcspiration, bundache, Tnitil narcotic efficcLs, increased blood pressure and pulse, and asphyxiation. Symptoms of overexposure to carbon dioxide become, more apparent when atmospheric oxygen is decreased to Chronic han-nful effects are not known firoin repeated inhaJadon of concentrations below the 1'111],FTLV. Product may also act as asphyxiant. Effects of oxygen deficiency may include: rapid breathing, diminished mental alertness, impaired muscular coordination, faulty Judgement, depression of all sensations, emotiond inswbilitv and. fatigue. As asphyxiation progrer,%es., nausea, vomiting, prostration, and loss of consciousness may result, cventuully leading to convulsions, coina, and death AIEDWAL CONDITIONS AGGRAVATED BY EXPOSURE: None known, POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS: Not expected to be (oxic to fish and wildlife.. 4. First Aid Measures EYES: Nuver introduce ointr ent or oil into the eyes without medical advice! In case of freezing or cryogenic "bums" caused by rapidly cyaporating liquid, DO NOT WASH THE EYES WITH HOT OR EVEN TEPID WATER! Remcrvevictim from the source of contaminatiori. For contact with small amounts of liquid, open tht-, cyclids r,vidc to ullow the liquid to evaporate. For contact with large arn-oitnM, rinse -,%ith a low prvk%ure stream of cool water For 15 minutes. Refer the victim to an ophthalmologist for treatment and follow -up. If the victim cannot tolerate light, protect the eyes with dark- glasses. ThL use oC bandages is not rccommended- as kccpipg the eyelids closed or exerting pressure on the eyelid may cause further damage. STUX. For dermal contact or fro4bite: Rmove contaminated clothing and fhi,-,h affected areas with lukewarm %awr. DO NOT USE HOT WA= A physician should see the patient promptly if contact with the product has resulted in blistering of the dermal surface, frostbite, or in deep tissue freezing. INGESTION: A physician should see the patient promptly if frostbite has occurred- NISUS: G-99 Revised: 06/18/04 Page 2 of 7 PRi3L7tJt� _ftiA#VE �A9E5.0N.is3[OKIQE ;_I E R1 1= ATEQLI4€kiC3 __ INHALATION: PROMPT MEDICAL ATTENTION IS MANDATtaRY TN ALL CASTS OF OVEREXPOSURE TO CARBON t)IOXTDF— RESCUE PERSONNEL SHOULD B£ EQUIPPED V►'ITIl SELF- CONTADgM BREATI]ING APPARA.•i`t I S. ConscimLg moons should he assisted to an uncontmninuted area and inhale: fresh air. Quick removal from the oontaminated area is most important 1. inconseious persons should be moved to an uncontaminatuxl area, given motrtit -to -mouth resuscitation and supplemental oxygen. Further treatment sho-ukt be symptomatic and supportive. 6. Fire Fighting Measures Contiitivns of Flamurability: Nonflammable Flash point: lone Mefhrxi- Nvt Applicable AutxAiKrrition Ten ature: Namn LEL( %): i4vne 11I:1.(n /�.) Ntme Hazardous combustion roducts_ None Sensititi itY to mechanical shack: None Sensitivity in st1atiF diwctzirrt�,c: Novi FIR F. AND EXPLOSION HAZARDS: Nonflammable. Cylinder tnay vent rapidly or rupture violently horn pressure when involved in a fire situation. EXTINGUISHING MEEDIA: None required. Use as appropriate for suarounding materials. FIRE hIGHTING INSTRUCTIONS: firefighters should wLar respiratory protection (SCBA) and fill! torix 1ri or Bunker gear. Continue to cool tire- exposed containers until well -after flames. are es0ingeeishi�. 6. Accidental Release Measures 1(vacuate all personnel f rorn afCecLed area. Use appropriate protective equipment (See Section 13). Step the flow of gas or remove cylinder to outdour location if this can be done without risk. Ventilate enclosed areas. if lertk is in coulairter or container valve, contact the appropriate emergency tcic -phone number listed in Section 1 nr call your closest HOC location. 7. Handling and Storage Electrical Classification: Non- Ifir/Ardous. This liquefied gas is noncorrosive and may lit. rasa F with all common stn.tetural materials. Dry carbon dioxide eau be handled in most common structural materials. Moist carbon dioxide is generally corrosive by its formation of carbonic acrid. For applications with moist Carbon dioxide, 316, 309 and 31 n stainless steels may he used aR well a3 I iasta lloy (D A, B, & C, and Mouel ®. Ferrous Nrickel alloys are siiphil � susceptible to corrosion At normal temperatures carrion diotiidc is compatible with mo,�t plastics and elastomers. Somc rnet:sls (i.e.: carbon steel) will become brittle at love- temperatures and easily iructurc. Use only 1 m� " . �'. �t. (Y fi�i. S;_ r.�£ti ,. .9 s. 4':' anal 1300 rrLStimetion_s. Do not tip, drag, slide or rot i ;'z . ,`Y::. r. �� ti�att,s� + <� 1]t�E.. �. c,�'i i e .:z �.. . �t .,,. i ,... ±".',I�t.. Valve pT:tAection caps roust remain in place unless container is aecured with valve nt t t r �u use PoiaL if user experiences any difiicult.v operatiug container valve discontinue use and contact supplier. Do not inst -'rt arty object {i.e.: screw(river) into valve cap openings as this can damage the valve causing leakage. NISIM G -99 Revised: 06!18104 Page 3 of 7 Vill Z:V/ Vu ItIL 11;U0 VAA U4UO004JOU 11LIUL111A nrILLA PLO f7" , QUOTMAW CAI �Wwojbx[M .. PE"IF—W-G—E, RAMD UQUID, Use a pressure reducing Tegulat(Fr when f.-onnccting cylinder to lower pressure piping or sys(.cms. Dormtheal containers by any means to increase the discharge rate of product from the cylinder. Use a cheek-aM. or trap in the discharge line to prevent hazurdous buck flow into the systmi- PrulccL contaimm from physic.-al damage. Store in cool, dry-, well-Ycntikt;,d w-Lu away from heavily trafficked areas and emergency exits. Containem should be stored upright and firmly secured to prevent Ming or being knocked over. Full. mid empty cylinders shoidd be segregated. Use a 'T" in-rust out" inventory system to girvent full containers being sLmcd for cxczs-3iv,: periods of time. Never allow any unprotected part of the body to touch untitisidated pipes or vessels coutaking cryogenic fluids. The Cxtreinely cold metal Nivill cawvc the flesh to stick and tear when you attemlA to mnovu it. Stationary customer site vessels should be operated- in a"(Yrdince vvith the manufaoturer's and BOC's instructions. Do not attempt Lo rcpzdr, adjust or in any rather way inodify the WLration of these vessels. If there i- a malfunction or other type of operations problem %Nith the vessel, contact the closest BBC location iminediately for assistance. Dtie to the extremely cold liquid, uninsulated transfer lines may condense air. The liquefied air may flash off nitrogen, leaving an oxygen enriched liquid- Do not allow the liquefied air to wjitmt oils, greases, or other' com bustible materials such as asphalt and motor oil. For additional .hiforination, consult the Compressed Gas Association z(CGA'i pamphlets P-1, G-6 Carbon Dioxide. CY-6.1 Sunidard for Low Pressure Carbon Dioxide Systems at Coniu.mer Sites, CT-6.3 Carbon Dioxide Filling and Handling Procedures for lieveraCe plants, and SB-7. Never carry Roompre.s.wd gas cvjiiideror.9 container of u gas in cryogenic liquid forni in an euclowd space such as U car Uunk-, vita or Station wagon. A leak can result in H fire, explosion, asphyxiatimt or at toxic exposure_ ENGINEERING CONTRO 1,S: Uqe local exhaust in, combination with general ventilation to control air contaminants to at or below acceptable exposure guidelines aiul modiltain almospheric; oxygen at 19.5%. EYVFACE PROTECT]LON: Wear chemical goggles with faceshields where contact with liquid is possible. SKIN PROTECTION: IrisuluLed gluves are rucouttaunded for cryogenic liquids. =RESPIRATORY PROTECTION: For emergency release use a positive PM3,jum- MOSH approved air-supplying respirator *Yaxtuls (SCBi's- or airlinw'Lscape bottle' uiiing a Dull -face mask and at a minimum Grade D air. OTHER/GENEMALL PROTECTIOM Safety shoes, cmurguney eyewash stations XMDS: 0-99 Revised: (.16;1911'14 Page 4 of? U. VV0 F'ROEiUC -t- -1 A E;.. CAP 8C?i #}lf? PE3 ,. �EEE�iGERFii EEC -LICE It3 ' . Physical and Chemical Properties PARAMETER, VALUE (UNITS PhysiL=l sLdLc (gas, liquid, solid) Cyvagenie liquid Vapor precw-e at 70'F 856 psis Vapor density at 70V, I atm (Air _ I) 1.53 €vapuraLion point Not Available 13oilitV point (CO, 14ublkes) -109.3 `T -78.5 L,C 1'rcc7ing point -69.9 PH Not Available Specific gravity : Not Available Oillwater partition eoeTiicienr Not A", ilabie Solubility (13.0) : 4rory soluble Odor threshold :}'pint Applicable (kior and appearance A colorless, clear liquid -Aliieh evaporates to a Co6rIess, odorless gas. 10. Stability and Reactivity STABILITY: Stable INCOMPATIBLE MAiTERIALSICON:DITIONS: Certain reactive metals, hydrides, moist ecssium monoxide, or lithntn acetylene carbide diamina may ignite. Passing carbon dioxide over a tnimuie of sodium peroxide and alueainum orinagnesiuni may explode. HAZARDOUS POLYMERIZATION: Will not occur. 11. Toxicological Information SKIN AND EYE: Gas is non - irritating. Liquid may cause tissate dal age. INHALATION. Acidosis. adrenal cortical. exhaustion, and other metabolic stresses have resulted from prolonged continuous exposurc: to 1 -2% carbon dioxide (10,_0042) ppin — 20,000 ppin). The ACGTH TL V of 5,0110 ppm is expected to provide a gu<xi margin of saCuty Crum asphrxialion and undue; metabolic stress provided sufficient oxygen levels are maintained in the air. Increased physical activity, duration of c%posure. mud deereused oxy geu content can affect systemic and resltirttort efTects resulting from exposure to carbon dioxide. GATHER: Oxygen. deficiency during pregnawy has produced developmental abnormalities in humans and experimental animals. Exposure of feruale mats to 60,0000 &pm carbon dioxide for 24 hours has produced toxic effects tp the einbryo and lulus in pregnant TfiN, Toxic effects to the re.°Im)dtu.tive syxWyn have bean obsu ved in olhur mammalian species at similar concentrations. Chronic, hannhil effects are not k-novn from repeated inhalation of low f3 to 5 molar ,o) concentrations. MSDS: 0' -99 Revised: 06,118104 Page 5 of 7 "vj v v v 01;"20;'05 THC 11:56 FAX 6263384530 ALODLi BELL, FUS a007 ?Ft3U!C,Itiftilli _E} IMF :C4r`fRf} >__F_f�'IEF:ED�40 ifC%_ 12. Ecological information Prodw does noc contain Class I or Class U ozone depleting sD bswAoes. Not tonic. Will not bioconcuntrutc. 13. Disposal Considerations Do not actempt to dispose of residtial waste or tmused quantities. Return in the shipping container PROPERLY LABELED, WITH ANY VALVE OUTLET PLUGS OR CAPS SECURED AND VALVE PROTECTION, CAP IN PLACE to BOO Gases or authorized distributor for proper disposal. 14. Transport Information lea :A R : PROPER SHIPPING NAME: Carbon Dioxide, refrigerated liquid Carbon Dioxide, refrigerated liquid HAZARD GLASS: 2.2 22 IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: UN 2197 UN 2187 S111PPING LASCL: NOhif t.AMMADLC GAe NONFLAMMABLE GA.:, Regulatory Information SARA TITLE TIT NOTIFICATIONS AND INFORMATION SARA. TITLE III IiAZARD CLASSES: Acute Health Hazard Suddern l cleric of Pressurc: I Iazarcl SARA TITLE III - SECTION 313 SUPPLIER NOTIFICATION: This product docs not contain ioxic clirfa kats subject to r4-porting mil airc.munt -,of wrtion 323 of the 11mergency Planning and C:omratinhy Right -To --Know Act (EPCRA) of 1986 aixi of 40 CFR 372, U.S. TSCA/Canadian DSL,: All ingredients are listod. on thu U.S. 'Toxic- Substance:; Control Act(.l•SCA:j inventory or exempt from listing and oil the Canadian Domestic Substance List (DSL). California Proposition 65: 'Iiiis prgoduci does not contain ingrudie.°nt(s) known to the State of C a- liCornin to cause cancer or reproductive Toxicity. Canadian Cnetrt ►lied Products Regalittions (CPR): This ppmduct has been clasaiFied in acc:acrdance v,ith the hazard criteria of the CPR and the NIS17S contains all the information required bp- the CPI;L MSOS. U-99 Revised. 06/18/04 Page 6 of 7 ol,'20i UG THC it : G7 F,LT 6263334530 NAMNA BELLA FDS 2008 16. Other Information NFPA HAZARD CODES HAITS HAZARD CODES RATIl` GS SYSTEM Health: 3 Health: 3 0 = No hazard Lilammability: 0 Flanin>ability: (} 1 = Slight Hazard Instability: 4 Physical hazard: 2 2 = Moderate hazard 3 = Seri,,-us Hazard 4 = Scv= Hazard Nntc: I:adngs were asligncd in aecordwice with Compressed Gas Association (CGA) guidelines as published in CGA Pamphlet P- 19- 2()f)4, f 'C:.4 Recommended Hazard li'ntings fir C.. nmpreeced Gave., ?"' Fditlon _ACQM American Contimmet; of (ioN=umenial Industrial Hygwnists DOT Ov- partmcnt of Transp Ttation IARC International Agency for ttcsearc6 on Canccr V 11' National Toxicning 1hogam CISHA Occupational Safety and Health .Adminktratinn pi-A, Pe niciihleRxpaaw•eLimit SARA SuperfiunJ Anteudinenis and Reaufhorizetion Act STFI. Short Term Exposure Limit TT)G Transportation ofDaiigerous Goods TIN Threshold Limit Valve «i i \3P5 WDrkplacc Iiazardous Matcsials information System Compressed gas cylinders sball not be refilled without the eXpress ATitwn pennission of dill: o!siier. Shlpiucia of a winpressed gas cylinder which has not been filled by the owner or with his/her (,.tTi&n) consent is a violation of transportation regulations_ DISCLAIMER OF EXPRE&SED AND IMPLIED WARRANTIES: Although reasonable care has been taken in the preparation of'this document, we extend nn -warranties and make no representations as to the accuracy or coinplewntss of the infotination contained here.itiL and assume no responsibility regarding the suitability of this information for the users intended purposes or for the consequences of its use. Eaeh individual should make a determination as to the suitability of the information for their particular piupo4e(s). MSLDS: G -99 Revised: 06,'18)04 Page7of7