The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2005 02 16TO THE MEMBERS OF THE AFOREMENTIONED AGENCIES AND THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Special Meeting of the aforementioned agencies is hereby called to be held on WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 2005 at 6:00 P.M. in the Council Chamber, 14403 E. Pacific Avenue, Baldwin Park, CA 91706. Said Special Meeting shall be for the purpose of conducting business in accordance with the attached Agenda. 11exeAMIA IN a -4:11111-91 R14111*13 # Dated: February 10, 2005 ORIGINAL SIGNED Manuel Lozano Mayor AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING 1, Rosemary M. Ramirez, Chief Deputy City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, certify that I caused the aforementioned Notice and Call of a Special Meeting to be delivered via email (hard copy to follow) to each Member and to the San Gabriel Valley Tribune, and that I posted said notice as required by law on February 10, 2005. Rosemary CMC Chief Deputy City Clerk City Council, Community Development Commission Special Meeting Agenda - February 16, 2005 11 I — BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION 44MR;LATZAVA • CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER 6:00 P.M. it i i1 27- Maiuel Lozaito N ri F1r;1W IT k 9TV =_1 Marlen Garcia David J. Olivas Bill Van Cleave Mayor/Chair Mayor Pro Tern/Vice Chair Councilmember/Member Councilmember/Member Councilmember/Member PUBLIC COMMENTS The public is encouraged to address the City Council or any of its Agencies listed on this agenda on any matter posted on the agenda or on any other matter within its jurisdiction. If you wish to address the City Council or any of its Agencies, you may do so during the PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS period noted on the agenda. Each person is allowed five (5) minutes speaking time. A Spanish-speaking interpreter is available for your convenience. City Council, Community Development Commission Special Meeting Agenda - February 16, 2005 COMENTARIOS DEL PUBLICO Se invita al p6blico a dirigirse a/ Concilio o cualquiera otra de sus Agencias nombradas en esta agenda, para hablar sobre cualquier asunto publicado en la agenda o cualquier terra que est6 bajo sujurisdicci6n. Si usted desea la oportunidad de dirigirse al Concilio o a1guna de sus Agencias, podri hacerlo durante el periodo de Comentarios del P(iblico (Public Communications) anunciado en la agenda. A cada persona se le permite hablar por cinco (5) minutes. Hay un int6rprete para su conveniencia. K CITY COUNCIL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING — 6:00 P.M. Five (5) minute speaking time limit Cinco (5) minutos sera el limite para hablar THIS IS THE TIME SET ASIDE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL PLEASE NOTIFY THE CITY CLERK IF YOU REQUIRE THE SERVICES OF AN INTERPRETER No action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances exist. The legislative body or its staff may: 1) Briefly respond to statements made or questions asked by persons; or 2) Direct staff to investigate and/or schedule matters for consideration at a future meeting. [Government Code §54954.2] ESTE ES EL PERIODO DESIGNADO PARA DIRIGIRSE AL CONCILIO FAVOR DE NOTIFICAR A LA SECRETARIA S1 REQUIERE LOS SERVICIOS DEL INTERPRETE No se podra tomar acci6n en a1g6n asunto a menos que sea incluido en la agenda, o a menos que exista algana emergencia o circunstancia especial. El cuerpo legislativo y su personal podran: 1) Responder brevemente a declaraci6nes o preguntas hechas por personas; o 2) Dirigir personal a investigar y1d fUar asuntos para tomar en consideraci6n en juntas proximas. [Codigo de Gobierno §54954.2] ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND COMFkINITT DEVELOP 1. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT (GC §54957) Title: Finance Director Title: Chief Executive Officer Title: Assistant Chief Executive Officer 2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION (GC §54956.9(a)) Name of Case: Baldwin Park Community Development Commission vs. Sicairos, et al., Case Number: Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC326071 Name of Case: Catalina Taylor vs. City • Baldwin Park Case Number: 001-03-00022 Name of Case: Daniel Montanez vs. City of Baldwin Park Case Number: 01-012A 3. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (GC §54956.8) Properties: 3119 Baldwin Park Boulevard 3139 Baldwin Park Boulevard 3159 Baldwin Park Boulevard 3163 Baldwin Park Boulevard Negotiators: Sid Mousavi, Stephanie Scher and Jack Wong Negotiating Parties: M & A Gabaee LP and Jesus R. and Bertha Sicairos, Lucas and Sandra Leroy, and Elazequi Nonatc, Under Negotiation: Price and terms of conveyance of property City Council, Community Development Commission Special Meeting Agenda - February 16, 2005 "i-pX011111 kill I X MMI I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing agenda was posted on the City Hall bulletin board not less than 24 hours prior to the meeting. Dated this 10th day of February, 2005. Ro� amirez, CMC Chi='pl—Uralty Clerk PLEASE NOTE: Copies of staff reports and supporting documentation pertaining to each item on this agenda are available for public viewing and inspection at City Hall, 2nd Floor Lobby Area or at the Los Angeles County Public Library In the City of Baldwin Park. For further information regarding agenda items, please contact the office of the City Clerk at 626.960.4011, ext. 108 or 626.960.4011, ext. 466 or via e-mail at rramirezQbaldwinpark. com or Inieto(o-)_baldwinpark.com In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the Public Works Department or Risk Management at 626.960.4011. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable staff to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. (28 CFR 34.102.104 ADA TITLE /1) City Council, Community Development Commission Special Meeting Agenda - February 16, 2005 4 A" 0 N*L1 Imuslawlip UITY MALL GUIRGIL GAA111 7:00 P.M. Manuel Lozano - Mayor Ricardo Pacheco - Mayor Pro Tern Marlen Garcia - Councilmember David J. Olivas - Councilmember Bill Van Cleave - Councilmember PUBLIC COMMENTS The public is encouraged to address the City Council or any of its Agencies listed on this agenda on any matter posted on the agenda or on any other matter within its jurisdiction. If you wish to address the City Council or any of its Agencies, es, you may do so during the PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS period noted on the agenda. Each person is allowed five (5) minutes speaking time. A Spanish speaking interpreter is available for your convenience. COMENTARIOS DEL PUBLICO Se invita al p6blico a dirigirse al Concilio o cualquiera otra de sus Agencias nombradas en esta agenda, pars hablar sobre cualquier asunto publicado en la agenda o cualquier terra que est6 bajo sujurisdicci6n. Si usted desea la oportunidad de dirigirse al Concilio o a1guna de sus Agencias, podri hacerlo durante el periodo de Comentarios del POblico (Public Communications) anunciado en la agenda. A cada persona se /e permite hablar por cinco (5) minutos. Hay un int6rprete.para su conveniencia. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING — 7:00 P.M. • • � ROLL CALL Councilmembers: Marlen Garcia, David J. Olivas, Bill Van Cleave, Mayor Pro Tern Ricardo Pacheco and Mayor Manuel Lozano 1: 21w14[Weel►i1►Yi1 k,1 1mgk Five (5) minute speaking time limit Cinco (5) minutos sera el limite Para hablar THIS IS THE TIME SET ASIDE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL PLEASE NOTIFY THE CITY CLERK IF YOU REQUIRE THE SERV ICES OF AN INTERPRETER No action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances exist. The legislative body or its staff may: 1) Briefly respond to statements made or questions asked by persons; or 2) Direct staff to investigate and /or schedule matters for consideration at a future meeting. [Government Code §54954.2] ESTE ES EL PERIODO DESIGNADO PARA DIRIGIRSE AL CONCILIO FAVOR DE NOTIFICAR A LA SECRETARIA Sl REQUIERE LOS SERVICIOS DEL INTERPRETS No se podra tomar accion en algun asunto a menos que sea incluido en la agenda, o a menos que exista aiguna emergencia o circunstancia especial. El cuerpo legislativo y su personal podran: 1) Responder brevemente a declaraciones o preguntas hechas porpersonas; o 2) Dingir personal a investigary /o fijar asuntos para tomar en consideracidn en juntas proximal [Codigo de Gobierno §54954.21 CONSENT CALENDAR All items listed are considered to be routine business by the City Council and will be approved with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a City Councilmember so requests, in which case, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. 1. MINUTES Staff recommends City Council approve the minutes of February 2, 2005 (Special); January 19, 2005 (Special); and January 5, 2005 (Special). 2. WARRANTS & DEMANDS Staff recommends City Council receive and file. City Council Agenda — February 16, 2005 Page 2 3. TREASURER'S REPORT Staff recommends City Council receive and file. 4. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 1256 Staff recommends City Council adopt Ordinance No. 1256 on second reading entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF AND ADDING SECTION 93.12 TO CHAPTER 93 OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO FIREWORKS SALES AND PERMITS." 5. • i READING OF OR NO. 1251 Staff recommends City Council adopt Ordinance No. 1251 on second reading entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK APPROVING . CHANGE OF • FROM • ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3773-3779 BRESEE STREET; APPLICANT: BOWDEN DEVELOPMENT; • 6. CLAIM REJECTIONS Staff recommends City Council reject the claims of Maria Garcia Martinez (11.04.04) and Jean - Pierre Modena (01.10.05) and direct staff to send the appropriate notice of rejection to claimants. 7. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE FORMATION OF CRAGMONT STREET IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2005-01 Staff recommends City Council waive further reading, read by title only and adopt Resolution Nr 2005-012 entitled, RESOLUTION OF • OF DISTRICT CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS IN PROPOSED CRAGMONT STREET ASSESSMENT • . 2005-01 . AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR THE DESIGN OF THE RESTORATION AND EXPANSION OF THE EXISTING SENIOR CENTER Staff recommends City Council: 1) Award a design contract for the restoration and expansion of the existing senior center to Pickard Architects in the amount of $86,300; and 2) Authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement; and 3) Authorize the Director of Public Works to execute any necessary change order in an amount not to exceed ten percent (10 %) of the original contract amount; and 4) Authorize the Finance Director to appropriate $94,930 ($86,300 + 10 %) from the Community Center bond proceeds. S. PROPOSED RECOGNITIONS BY THE MAY•- AND CITY COUNCIL FOR THE PERIOD FEBRUARY 16,2005 TO MARCH 1, 2005 Staff recommends Cit• p • the preparation an• presentation of • outlined in staff report. 10. REPORT ON STORM DAMAGE TO CITY BUILDINGS AND FACILITIE%`1-5 Staff recommends City Council and file the report. 11. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR A NEW CITYWIDE TELEPHONE SYSTEM Staff recommends City Council approve the Agreement with RealTime Communications/Siemens and authorize staff to appropriate $16,000 of the unused City Council Agenda - February 16, 2005 Page 3 DO8iDteO8OQe charges, $10'000 Of estimated CO[D[nUOiC@fOO S8ViOgS and the [8Dl8iOiOg $14,000 from unallocated Information Services Fund for a new City telephone system. SET MATTERS — PUBLIC HEARINGS (7:O0P.M.oree soon thereafter as the matter can beheard). If in the future you wish to challenge the following in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk and/or City Council etur prior to the public hearing. 12. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT, AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN (AGP- 108), APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE (Z-542); APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT PLAN (DR-28), AND APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TM-62166); LOCATION: 4958 MAINE AVENUE; APPLICANT: PEDRO AND MARTHA MALTOS (Continued from February 2, 2005) Staff recommends City Council continue the public hearing to March 2, 2005. 13. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN (AGP-109), A ZONE CHANGE (Z-544), A DEVELOPMENT PLAN (DR-29), A ZONE VARIANCE (ZV-696) AND A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TM-61346); LOCATION: 819 FRAZIER STREET; APPLICANT: D.C. CORPORATION (To be discussed concurrently with Community Development Commission Item No. 4) (Continued from February 2, 2005) Staff recommends City Council following the public hearing, waive further reading, read by title only and adopt Resolution No. 2005-006 entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DENYING REQUESTS FOR: 1) AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT TO RE- DESIGNATE PROPERTY FROM SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL; 2) A ZONE CHANGE FROM 01, OFFICE INDUSTRIAL TO R-3 (PD), MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT; 3) A DEVELOPMENT PLAN ALLOWING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TWELVE (12) UNIT SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND COMMON LOT; 4) A ZONE VARIANCE TO ALLOW LESS THAN THE MINIMUM REQUIRED PARKING SPACES FOR A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND 5) A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO SUBDIVIDE TWO LOTS INTO SIX LOTS FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES; APPLICANT: D.C. CORPORATION; CASE NOS.: AGP-109, Z-544, ZV-696, DR-29 AND TM-61346; LOCATION: 819 FRAZIER STREET." City Council Agenda - February 10.2OO5 Page RESIDENTIAL TO R -3, MULTI- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL; 3) A SPECIFIC PLAN WITH INCLUDED DEVELOPMENT PLAN ALLOWING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NINETEEN (19) UNIT SINGLE - FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND 4) A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO SUBDIVIDE FIVE (5) LOTS INTO NINETEEN (19) LOTS FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES; APPLICANT: D.C. CORPORATION; CASE NOS.: AGP110, Z -545, SP 04 -01, DR -30, AND TM- 61345; LOCATION: 3940- 3948 WALNUT STREET." 15. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTING A RESOLUTION APPROVING FEES FOR POLICE RELATED SERVICES (Continued from February 2, 2005) Staff recommends City Council following public hearing, waive further reading, read by title only and adopt Resolution No. 2005 -001 entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK APPROVING FEES FOR POLICE RELATED SERVICES." 16. PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THE USE OF FISCAL YEAR 2005 -06 FEDERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) AND HOME INVESTMENT Staff recommends City Council following public hearing: 1) Consider the approval of the proposed FY 2004 -05 CDBG Public Service Activities as presented; and 2) Receive and file the minutes of the Joint Commission /CDBG Advisory Committee meetings of January 6 and February 5, 2005. 7: I 1 i] 17. VACATION OF EXISTING RIGHT -OF -WAY ALONG KENMORE AVENUE (To be discussed concurrently with City Council Public Hearing Item No. 14) (Continued from February 2, 2005) Staff recommends City Council review D.C. Corporation's request to vacate the existing right -of -way along Kenmore Avenue and either deny or approve the construction of a substandard street. 18. HOUSING COMMISSION APPOINTMENT TO FILL THE UN- EXPIRED VACANCY OF OFFICE NO. 5 (SALLY IECK) (Continued from January 5, 2005) Staff recommends City Council either: 1) Waive further reading, read by title only and adopt Resolution No. 2005 -003 entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 2003 -046 APPOINTING TO OFFICE NO. 5 OF THE HOUSING COMMISSION FOR THE UN- EXPIRED TERM TO JUNE 30, 2007;" OR 2) Provide staff direction on the manner in which to proceed with filling said vacancy. 19. REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO SEND OUT REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS RELATED TO AN EVIDENCE AND PROPERTY MOBILE HIGH - DENSITY STORAGE SYSTEM & COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR A PROPERTY AND EVIDENCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Staff recommends City Council: 1) Authorize the Police Department to send out Request for Proposals regarding an evidence and property mobile, high- density storage system; 2) Authorize the Police Department to send out Request for Proposals regarding a Property and Management computer system; 3) Authorize the Interim Finance Director to make a budget amendment in the amount not to exceed $135,000. from trust account 150.00.2159 and to appropriate those funds to the general fund cost City Council Agenda — February 16, 2005 Page 5 center 100.24.5745; and 4) Direct Police staff to bring any recommendations for awards of contract to the City Council for final approval. 20. MEGAN'S LAW UPDATE Staff recommends City Council: 1) Receive the Police Department's oral update, 2) Review and comment on the newly developed draft policy that was provided to Council under separate cover; 3) Direct the Police Department to change any portion of the policy to coincide with Council's intent to proactively notify the community of a high risk or serious offender who is residing with the community; and 4) Direct staff to bring back the completed policy for council review at the March 2, 2005 Council meeting. COUNCIL / STAFF REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 21. REQUEST BY COUNCILMEMBER MARLEN GARCIA FOR DISCUSSION AND CITY COUNCIL CONSIDERATION TO RE-ESTABLISH THE BALDWIN PARK STREET MARKET WX91--m CERTIFICATION I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing agenda was posted on the City Hall bulletin board not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting. Dated this 10th day of February, 2005. Rosemary !��_�ez, CIVIC Chief Deputy City Clerk PLEASE NOTE: Copies of staff reports and supporting documentation pertaining to each item on this agenda are available for public viewing and inspection at City Hall, 2nd Floor Lobby Area or at the Los Angeles County Public Library in the City of Baldwin Park. For further information regarding agenda items, please contact the office of the City Clerk at 626.960.4011, ext. 108 or 626.960-4011, ext. 466 or via e-mail at rramirez @baldwinpark.com or lnieto(a-),baldwinpark.com In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the Public Works Department or Risk Management at 626.960.4011. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable staff to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. (28 CFR 34.102.104 ADA TITLE 11) City Council Agenda — February 16, 2005 Page 6 CITY • BALDWIN PARH SPECIAL MEETING City Council Community Development MINUTES WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 2, 2005 City Council Agenda Feb 16 2•05 Item No Manuel Lozano, Mayor/Chair Ricardo Pacheco, Vice-Chair Marlen Garcia, Member David J. Olivas, Member Bill Van Cleave, Member Maria Contreras, City Treasurer Kathryn Tizcareno, City Clerk The CITY COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION of the City of Baldwin Park met in SPECIAL SESSION at the above time and place. • �T Present: Members: Marlen Garcia (arrived at 6:14 p.m.), David J. Olivas (arrived at 6:17 p.m.), Bill Van Cleave, Vice-Chair Ricardo Pacheco and Chair Manuel Lozano Also Present: Sid Mousavi, Interim Executive Director; Stephanie Scher, Attorney; Mark Kling, Chief of Police; Hennie Apodaca, Interim Finance Director; Shafique Naiyer, Public Works Director; Jack Wong, Interim Community Development & Housing Director; Manny Carrillo, Recreation and Community Services Director; Maria A. Contreras, Kathryn Tizcareno, City Clerk; Laura Nieto, Deputy City Clerk and Rosemary M. Ramirez, Chief Deputy City Clerk The Council/Agency recessed to Closed Session at 6:03 p.m. and reconvened at 7:00 p.m., with all members present. City Attorney Scher reported the action as follows: PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT (GC §54957) Title: Chief Executive Officer Title: Finance Director Title: Assistant Chief Executive Officer Action: Matters were not discussed. Property: 15000 Badillo Street Negotiators: Sid Mousavi, Stephanie Scher and Jack Wong Negotiating Parties: Baldwin Park Masonic Lodge Under Negotiation: Price and terms of conveyance of property Action: Direction provided to pursue negotiations. No final action taken. Nothing further to report. Property: Parking at Ramona Boulevard from Baldwin Park Boulevard to Sterling Way Negotiators: Sid Mousavi, Stephanie Scher and Jack Wong Negotiating Parties: M & A Gabaee LP Under Negotiation: Price and terms of conveyance of property Action: Direction provided to pursue Owner Participation Agreement. No final action taken. Nothing further to report. I�MA CITY OF BALDWIN PARK — SPECIAL MEETING WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 2, 2005 City Council COUNCIL CHAMBER, 7:00 PM Community Development Commission Minutes Property: Site bounded by Dalewood Street, Gardien View Lane & Merced Avenue Negotiators: Sid Mousavi, Stephanie Scher and Jack Wong Negotiating Parties: Jacobsen Family Holdings Under Negotiation: Price and terms of conveyance of property Action: Direction provided on price and terms. No final action taken. Nothing further to report. OXMININMAI'm There being no other matters before the Council/Agency, the meeting was adjourned at 6:00 p.m. Approved as presented by the Council/Agency at their meeting held February 16, 2005. Rosemary M. Ramirez, CMC Chief Deputy City Clerk 9�Mj CITY OF BALDWIN PARK SPECIAL MEETING Housing Authority • JRVRW? WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 19, 2005 Council Chambers 11403 E. Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park. CA 91706 Manuel Lozano, Mayor /Chair Ricardo Pacheco, Vice -Chair Marlen Garcia, Member David J. Olivas, Member Bill Van Cleave, Member Maria Contreras, City Treasurer Kathryn Tizcareno, City Clerk The CITY COUNCIL, COMMUNITY AUTHORITY AND HOUSING AUTHORITY SESSION at the above time and place. DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION, FINANCE of the City of Baldwin Park met in SPECIAL Present: Members: Marlen Garcia, Bill Van Cleave, Vice -Chair Ricardo Pacheco and Chair Manuel Lozano Also Present: Sid Mousavi, Interim Executive Director; Stephanie Scher, Attorney; Jack Wong, Interim Community Development & Housing Director; and Rosemary M. Ramirez, Chief Deputy City Clerk REPORTS OFFICERS RESIDENTIAL 1. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION PROCEDURES RELATING TO HOUSING PROJECTS WITHIN ALL • -. from January 5, 2005) (Please Development Subject matter was not discussed. Matter deferred for discussion of Community Development C• • Agenda Item No. There being no other matters before the Council /Agency, the meeting was adjourned at 6:0 p.m. Approved as presented by the Council /Agency at their meeting held February 16, 2005. Rosemary M. Ramirez, CMC Chief Deputy City Clerk CITY OF BALDWIN PARK SPECIAL MEETING City Council and WEV111W WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 5, 2005 Council Chambers 11403 E. Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park. CA 91706 Manuel Lozano, Mayor/Chair Ricardo Pacheco, Vice-Chair Marlen Garcia, Member David J. 011vas, Member Bill Van Cleave, Member Maria Contreras, City Treasurer Kathryn Tizcareno, City Clerk The CITY COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION of the City of Baldwin Park met in SPECIAL SESSION at the above time and place. Present: Members: Marlen Garcia, David J. Olivas, Bill Van Cleave (arrived at 6:10 p.m.), Vice-Chair Ricardo Pacheco and Chair Manuel Lozano Also Present: Sid Mousavi, Interim Executive Director; Stephanie Scher, Attorney; and Rosemary M. Ramirez, Chief Deputy City Clerk The Council/Agency recessed to Closed Session at 6:05 p.m. and reconvened at 7:00 p.m., with all members present. City Attorney Scher reported the action as follows: PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT (GC §54957) Title: Chief Executive Officer Title: Finance Director Title: Assistant Chief Executive Officer Action: No final action taken. Nothing further to report. There being no other matters before the Council/Agency, the meeting was adjourned at 6:59 p.m. Approved as presented by the Council/Agency at their meeting held February 16, 2005. Rosemary M. Ramirez, CMC Chief Deputy City Clerk 1�� City Council Agenda DATE: February 16, 200W SUBJECT: Warrants and Demands The purpose of this report is for the City Council to allow the payment of Warrants and Demands against the City of Baldwin Park. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: The payroll of the City of Baldwin Park consisting of check numbers 161117 to 161521, inclusive, voids: 161117, 161120, 161128, and 161138, for the period of January 16, 2005 through January 29, 2005 inclusive, have been presented and hereby ratified, in the amount of $519,985.06. General Warrants, including check numbers 148627 to 148909 inclusive, in the total amount of $606,196.51, constituting claims and demands against the City of Baldwin Park, are here with presented to the City Council as required by law, and the same hereby ratified. Pursuant to Section 37208 of the Government Code, the Chief Executive Officer or designee does hereby certify to the accuracy of the demands hereinafter referred to and to the availability of funds for payment thereof. Receive and file. City of Baldwin Park ` Feb 00, 2005 08:34am Page Y Payment History. Bank AP Payment Bates 00/00/0000 to 91/99/9999 Check/ACHI's 148627 to 140909 Payment Type Check ________________________________________ Vond0 Vendor Name Rem|t0 Payee 7098 10'0 RETROFIT Cla\ml General Description 651145 MAINT-POLICE EQUIP '------------------------'----------' Bank Checki Chk Date Chock Amount Sep AP *808 01/27/05 77.29 PO0 3tat Cootrati Immion# Imc 8t Gross Amount Discount Amt 0inCmmt Used Net Amount 12054 O 273 12/08/04 77.29 0.00 77.29 0' Distribution Gross Amount Work OrderV ACt0 Description 130'58-5270 77.29 1 E6 ^ANNUX -R2O04/05^ MAINTENANCE OF POLICE EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT ON PATROL VEHICLES PO Liquidation Amount 130-58'5270 77.0 ----------''—'-------'—`'''----'---''------------'--'-------------------'-----'-----'--'''''------- VondA Vendor Name Romiti Payee Bank Ck8uk8 Chk Data Check NmuUDt Soy 11 AAD DOOR REPAIR 2 A60 O[0R REPAIR . AP 148629 01/27105 928,28 Claiml General Description 65565 GATE REPAIRS PO# Stat Cont0uW ImvoiQe# Inm Dt 12039 C 10235/5A9 01/07/05 GL Distribution Gross Amount 100_57-5000 20.02 127'57-5000 0.00 PO Liquidation Amount 100-57-5000 A.(N 127'57-5000 716.86 ' OaN@ General Description 65566 GATE REPAIRS Gross Amount Discount Amt 0iSom0t Used Net kmDoht 20.42 0.00 20.42 Work Order Act0 Description i EA ^ANNUkL FY2004/05* SERVICE/REPAIRS OF ELECTRIC SATES @ CITY FACILITIES, GENERAL FUND PORTION 1 EA PARKS MAINTENANCE PORTION PO#Stat ContractOInvoim# Inve Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Met Amount I2165 0 10235/5A0 01/07/05 171.50 0.00 171.58 10246/5A21 01/12105 736.28 0.08 736.28 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work Urden# AotCd 08SC;iytimD 100'57'5000 007.86 i [A ^ANKU8L'FY2004/05* ELECTRIC GATES @ CITY FACILITIES, GENERAL FUND PORTION 127-57-5000 0.00 1 EA PARKS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PORTION PO Liquidation Amount 100-57-5000 ________________________________________________________________________ 007,00 Vond0 Vendor Nome Remit# Payee Bank Omoki Ckk Date Check Amount Sep 6 A-1 EVENT & PARTY RENTALS AP 140630 01/27105 233.10 Q3iml General Description 65573 SUPPLIES PO# 3tat Con rad# Invo1(m0 Invc Ut Gross &0uKUt Discount Amt Discount Used Net ANuUVt 0 N/26N5 233.10 0.00 233.10 .. 0- Distribution GmaS Amount Work 0rderf kCtCd Description 100-73-5210 233.10 SUPPLIES _—____-_--________—_'__________________—,____-_--__—_______-__________' GCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Feb 08, 2005 09:34am Page 2 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dabm 00/00/0000 to 90199/9998 Ch8ok/ACNI'o 14807 to 140900 Payment Type Check _ --- _ --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- _ ----------- ------ --- --------- --- --- ------ --- --- --- _ --- ------ ------ --- --- --- --- _ --- ------ _ Van 0 Vendor Name Remitt Payee Bank Chexki Chk Date Check Amount Sep 076 ABU-LASHIK MOBIL SERVICE AP 148631 01/27/05 405.32 Cl8inl General Description 65560 EMERGENCY FUEL PO# Stat Contract8 Invoicn# 11828 O K4283532 K06000 K4283440 K42934531 K42H33W8 K*283263 K403241 8L Distribution 1S0-58-010 P8 Liquidation 130-59-5210 Cla1ml General Description 65561 EMERGENCY FUEL PURCHASE PO#Stad CnntrxctlInvOicef 11828' O K4283123 K4283015 K42830S1 K/2U3N4% 8325085 - � - 8029096- 8330000 1-3679 SL Distribution 130-58'5210 Iwm Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12/01N4 49.55 0.00 40.55 12/06/04 38J2 0.00 38.72 12/09/04 58.74 0.00 58.74 12/01/04 11.88 0.00 11.88 12/13/04 38.0 0.00 33.78 12/16/04 15.00 0,00 15.00 12/17/04 54.44 0.00 54.44 SnsS Amount Work 0rderV ActCd Description 20,11 1 EA ^ANNUUL'FY2004/05^ EMERGENCY FUELING OF POLICE DEPT UNITS & CITY VEHICLES A0OUDt Inm 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12/22/04 44.94 0,00 44.94 12/23/04 43.10 0.00 43.10 12/28/04 16.00 0.08 16.00 12/28/04 27.00 0.00 27.00 12/29/04 21.94 0.00 21.94 12/29/04 29.50 8,40 29.50 12/28/04 21.35 0.00 21.35 12/29/04 19.30 0.00 10,38 Gross Amount Work Urder0 A(tCd Description 223.21 i EA *kNN0AL-FY004/051 EMERGENCY FUELING OF POLICE npnr ourriZ L rrry vcurnry PO Liquidation Amount 130-58'5210 Z28.21 _____-_-'________'_______-__-____'______-______-____-___-_____________ Vond0 Vendor Name R80itf Payee Bank ChmCk0 Chk Date Check Amount 3oy 7594 ACE COMMERCIAL INC. AP 148632 01/27/05 0.50.00 Cla1ml General Description 65562 BP NOR-JAN PofStat Contract#lnvoicef Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 114431 01/26/05 �.502.00 0.00 5,502.00 GL Distribution Gnmn Amount Work Order8 A(t0 Description 100'81-5000 6,50.00 J6W'DP NOW _______________________________________________________________ CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 0.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of 0aldw1n Park Feb 0[ Z005 U8:34am Page J Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 59/99/9999 Check/ACHI's 148627 to 140909 Payment Type Check --- --- ---- --------------- --- --- --- --- --- --- ------------------------ ------ --- ------ --- --------------------- --- --------- --- ------ ------ Vend0 Vendor Name Rem|tt Payee Bank 0eck0 Chk Date Check Amount Sep 3706 JAMES R STONE DBA; ACTION LOCK & 5 AP 140633 01/27/05 607.09 Claim# General Description 65563 KEYS/LOCK3 PO#Stat Contract#Immicef Invc Ot Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11704 0 0 01/05/05 '321.11 0,00 321.11 5.565,95 08 01/05/06 25.98 0.00 25,58 Description 000 01/13/05 82.50 0.80 82.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES 0000 01/13/05 56,52 0.00 56.52 8L Distribution Gross Amount Work OrderX AdCd Description Amount 100-57'5210 435.94 114-53'5020-880 -''-''—'-'----'----'----'—'--' '------'-----'-'''--''--'----'-----'-----------'----'-----'^------'---'' i E6 *ANNUAL-R2004/05^ REPAIR 0 REPLACEMENT OF KEYS & LOCKS IN CITY FACILITIES, GENERAL FUND PORTION 127'57-5210 50.17 1 EA PARKS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PORTION PD Liquidation Amount 100-57-5210 435.94 127-57-5210 50.17 SI3im# General Description 65564 LOCKS/KEYS SRV PO#Stat Contract0Invo1ce# lnvc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11705 O 00000 01/13/05 100.98 0.00 10.98 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Orden# hdt0 Description 100'57-5000-211 120.88 1 GA ^6NN0N--R2004/05* REPAIR & REPLACEMENT OF KEYS � LOCKS AT TEEN CENTER FACILITY P0 Liquidation Amount 100-57'5000-211 120.08 _-______'_._-__-____--____________—__--________—___________________—'_- V8Od0 Vendor Name RHm t0 Payee Bank Cheok0 0k 08to Check Amount 3oy 6189 ADVANCED APPLIED ENGINEERING, INC. Nn 148634 01/27/05 9'923.30 Claiml General Description POI StatContract0Invoice0 Invc Ot Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 1207 0 13013 12/06/04 4`357.35 0.00 4'55735 1376 01/05/05 5.565,95 0.00 5,58535 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Orderl AdCd Description 114-0'500-880 9.923.30 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2004/05^ PROVIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR GRAIGMONT STREET IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSMENT DISTRICT, CIP 800 PO Liquidation Amount 114-53'5020-880 -''-''—'-'----'----'----'—'--' '------'-----'-'''--''--'----'-----'-----------'----'-----'^------'---'' 9,923.50 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Feb 08, 2005 08,34am Page 4 Payment History. Dank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9909 Check /AGH #'s 148627 to 148909 Payment Type Check --------..--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Dank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 42 AIRGAS AP 148635 01/27/05 243.28 Claim# General Description 65569 OXYGEN TANKS PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11627 0 103180267 11/30/04 21.90 0.00 21.90 103912694 12/22/04 199.00 0.00 199.00 103201988 12/31/04 22.38 0.00 22.38 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 130 -58 -5210 243.28 1 EA °ANNUAL- FY2004/05' OXYGEN, ACETYLENE AND WELDING SUPPLIES PO Liquidation 130 - 58-5[10 Vend# Vendor Name 4016 AIRGAS WEST Claim# General Description 65567 HELIUM TANKS PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 11667 C 103205230 GL Distribution 150 -00 -2172 100-73 -5210 100 -76 -5210 PO Liquidation 100- 73-5210 100 -76 -5210 150-00 -2172 Vend# Vendor Name 7631 ALFONSO PRADO Claim# General Description 65568 REFUND C&D SECURITY Amount 243.28 Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 140636 01/27/05 22.32 Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12131/04 22.32 0.00 22.32 Gross Amount Work Order# ActC4 Description 12.75 1 EA 'ANNUAL- FY2004/05$ HELIUM FOR SPECIAL EVENTS, TRUST DEPOSIT PORTION 638 1 EA SENIOR SERVICES PORTION 3.19 1 EA TEEN CENTER PORTION Amount 0.00 0.00 36.85 Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 148637 01127/05 1,195.00 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/26/05 11195.00 0.00 11195.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 129-00-2075 1,195.00 REFUND C &D SECURITY CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 NIAPR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Feb NL 2005 08:346m Page 5 payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 9S/99/9999 Check/ACHI's 148627 to 140909 Payment Type Check _________________________________________________________________________ Vond8 Vendor Name Remit& Payee Bank CheCk# Chk Date 08Ck Amount Sep 5748 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY, INC. 1 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY AP 148638 01/29/05 07.59 Claim# General Description 05570 MISC SUPPLIES POI 3bt CoDtrmt# Invo|m0 IoYC[t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12301 C 46159 10/08/04 637.59 0.00 637.59 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work Ordm^ A(tCd Description 100-57-5210 318.79 1 UZ MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES (LUBRICANT, ODOR ELIMINATOR & SANITIZING TOWElS), GENERAL FUND PORTION 127'57'5210 318.80 1 [& PARKS MAINTENANCE PORTION P0 Liquidation Amount 100'57-5210 318.80 127'57'5210 ' 918.80 --'-'--'-'''----'''-----'----------'----'----'-'—'---'-----'---'---'—'--''-----'---'---''-------'--'--'' Vond0 Vendor Name Rw0|t# Payee Dank Chmok# Chk UBt8 Check Amount Sop 7632 ANY YASQU[Z AP 14809 01127/05 15.00 Cbtml General Description 65571 REFUND-MAGIC HT POI 3tat CDotract0 Imm1cel Invc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Uioom0t Used Net Amount 0 01/26/05 0.00 0,00 15.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order0 AntCd Description 150-00-2172 15.00 REFUND—MAGIC MT _______-_________-__-_'________________-_—____________—___________—_- Vond0 Vendor Name ' Remit0 Payee Bank Ch8Ck0 Chk Date Check Amount Sop 7560 ARAM&KK REFRESHMENT SERVICES AP 148640 01/27/05 28.50 Qo1ml General Description 65572 COFFEE SERV PO# Stat COUt[act# I00icel IUvC 0t SrmG Amount Discount Amt NoC00t Used Net Amount 6054-913365 12/17/04 0.50 0.00 28.50 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rder0 AotCd Description 100-91'5330 28.50 COFFEE SERV --------- Vendor Name Re0it0 Payee Bank ChoCk# Chk Date Check Amount Sop 70 ARBOR NURSERY A9 148641 01/27105 541,25 ClaimlGennml Description 65557 NURSERY STOCK P0# &tad Contract# lnvoito# Invn Lt 8[mm Amount Discount Amt Uinnmmt Used Net Amount 12278 0 23644 11/30/04 541.25 0.00 541.25 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work Orderf ACtCd Description 121-68'5210 541.25 ' 1 E& *ANNUAL-R2004/054 STREET TREE INVENTORY (REPLACES PO#11602 CLOSED IN ERROR BY SYSTEM) PO Liquidation Amount 121'68'5210 541.25 ----'-''--'----''---------'------'-----'-----'—'—''-----'----'—'-----'-'---''—''---'---'-'----''-'---'-'' CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N^APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Ualdwm Parx Veb UU, 00 oU:34am Y3ge h Payment History. Bank 8P Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 05/90/9990 Skock/AC #'o 14807 to 10009 Payment Type Check _________________________________________________________________________ Vondl Vendor Name Remi0 Payee Bank Cheo 8 Ckk Date Check Amount Sep 5163 ASHTOR8H 9T PETER AP 14960 01/27/05 18.00 Cl8im# General Description 65574REFUND-TDUANA TRIP POI 3tat COntrmcti Invnixo0 Imo Nt 8rnnn Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount V 01/26/05 18.00 0.00 18.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Orden# AotCd Description 150-00-2169 18.00 REFUND-TJ ____________________________________________________________________ Vond# YorNor Name Remitt Payee Bank 0oCk0 Ckk Date Check Amount Sop 101 8ALDWlN COOKE CO. 8P 148643 01/27/05 370.87 Claim8 General Description 65575 '05 WEEKLY PLANNERS PON3tat Contract#Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 8500404 12/01/04 370.87 0.00 370.07 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# Ad0 Description 100'45-010 46.38 '05 WEEKLY PLANNER 100-46'5210 46.21 '05 WEEKLY PLANNER 100-53-5210 46.39 '05 WEEKLY PLANNER 100-57'5210 61.84 '05 WEEKLY PLANNER 114-50-010'094 77.30 '05 WEEKLY PLANNER 121-69'5210 92'76 '05 WEEKLY PLANNER --'-----------'—'--------------------------------------'-----'-----'—'---------'—'—'--'— Y8ndA Vendor Noxm R8mit0 Payee D68k Chonk# Ckk Cato Check Amount Soy 113 0AL0NIN PARK UNIFIED SCHOOL 0I3TRI Nz 148644 01/27/05 775.05 C}a1a& General Description 65577 LATCHKEY SNACKS-DEC '04 PO#8tat Cont[act0Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Not Amount 11670 O 689 01/11/05 779.85 0.00 770,05 0L Distribution G0uo Amount Work Order# Ant0 Description 100-75-5000 779,05 1 EA *kNN0AL-FY2004/05* SNACKS FOR LATCHKEY PROGRAM P0 Liquidation Amount 100'75'5000 ____________________________________________________________________ 779.05 V8Od0 Vendor Name Romit0 Payee Bank 08oki Ckk Date Check Amount Sep 2450 06L0NIN PARK HIGH SCHOOL YEARBOOK 1 8ALUWIN PARK HIGH SCHOOL AP 148045 01/27/05 200.00 Qaim0 General Description 65576 FULL PAGE AD HIGH SCHOOL YR BOOK POI 3tat CoDtrac i InvO1ce.# Imm 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Not Amount 0 01/76/05 200.00 0.00 200.08 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rder0 kCtCd Description 100'75-5240 200,00 SCHOOL Y8 BOOK _____________________________________________________________________ CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) city of tsaiawin Nara reD Un, coos ua:.)gam gage r Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #`s 148627 to 140909 Payment Type Check ------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7439 BROTHERS PRINTING # LITHOGRAPHY AP 148646 01/27/05 259.80 Claim# General Description 65578 ENVELOPES PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12254 C 214914 07/26/04 259.80 0.00 259.80 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 131 -14- 5440-060 259.80 ENVELOPES PO Liquidation Amount 131 -14- 5440 -060 259.80 -------- ..--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 5133 BUENA VISTA PICTURES DISTRIBUTION AP 148647 01/27/05 208.00 Claim# General Description 65579 PURCHASE TICKETS SR TRIP 2/17/05 POI Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/26/05 208.00 0.00 208.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 150- 00-2169 208,00 SR TRIP 2/17/05 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 2424 C.P.O.A. AP 148648 01/27/05 173.00 Claim# General Description 65582 TUITION-M STEHLY 02 /24/05- 02/25/05 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/26/05 173.00 0.00 173.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Rork Order# ActCd Description 106 -25 -5340 173.90 M STEHLY Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7633 CALIFORNIA CHAPTER FBI-NAA AP 148649 01/27/05 5530 Glaim# General Description 65585 15 DUES FBI NTL ACADEMY ASSOC PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/26/05 55.00 0.00 55.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -25 -5240 55.00 '05 DUES-FBI NTL ACADEMY ASSOC CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N'APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Feb VR' Z00 08:34am P3Um 8 Payment History. Bank AP Payment 0otoo 00/00/0000 to 99/95/9099 Omok/ACH#'S 14807 to 140909 Payment Type Check _________________________________________________________________________ VeDdl Vendor Name Remit0 Payee Bank 08ok0 Ckk Date Check Amount Soy 201 CALIFORNIA DISCOUNT GLASS AP 148650 01/27/05 1'767.79 Cbinl General Description 65587 GLASS REPLACEMENT POI Stad Controo i Immiue0 l2163 0 0087 02105 SL Distribution 127-57'5210 PO Liquidation 127-57-52I0 Clainl General Description 65598 GLASS REPLACEMENT PO# Stat Conbac 8 Invoicel 11709 O 02105 ` 0106 02107 02108 02115 GL Distribution 100-57-5210-211 Invc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 01/03/05 290.91 0.00 29031 01/12/05 16,57 0.00 16,57 G0SS Amount Work Drder0 AotCd Description 307,48 i EA °ANK&AL'FY2004/051 GLASS REPLACEMENT Amount 307.48 Invc Dt Gross Amount 01/12/05 0.43 01/10/05 115.00 01/06105 192.48 01/05/05 304.40 01/05/05 755.00 Gross Amount Work Order#6d NoCm0t Amt 0ioommt Used Net Amount 0.00 93.43 030 115.00 0.00 192.48 0.00 304.40 0.00 755.00 Cd Description i EA *ANNUALFY2004/05* GLASS REPL6GEMEWT AT TEEN CENTER FACILITY PO Liquidation Amount 100-57'5210-211 1,<68.51 __________________________________________________________________________________ VoDd0 Vendor Name ` — Romi 0PJy8V Bank CheuM Ckk Date Check Amount Sep 1573 CALIFORNIA PEACE OFFICERS ASSOC AP 148651 01/27105 355,00 Qainl General Description 65039 DUES JAN-DEC '05 MEMBER lDI 1225 PO#Stat Contract0Invoicel Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 46748 01/05/05 363.00 0.00 365.00 SL Distribution @moo Amount Work 0rder0 AotCd Description 100'26-040 365.00 "AN-DEC `05 003 _____________________________________________________________________ VondV Vendor Name. R8miti Payee Bank ChmCk0 Ckk Date Check Amount Soy 3205 CALSAFE AP 148652 01/27/05 650.00 Qoiml General Description 65584 ASSAULT EXAM POI Stat Contracti Invoicel Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11568 U 934 01/05/05 650.00 0.00 650.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# kdW Description 100'23-5000 650,00 1 EA ^ANNNAL-R2004/05* SEXUAL ASSAULT EXAMINATIONS PO Liquidation Amount 100'23-5000 650.00 __________________________________________________________________ GGS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) G11y of HAM rarx reo uu, on un. ,)gam rage v Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00 /00 /0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #'s 148627 to 148909 payment Type Check Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 4544 CAR QUEST AUTO PARTS - DISTRIBUTION AP 148653 01/27/05 2,665.32 Claim# General Description 65591 NISC AUTO SUPPLIES PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12302 0 170 - 031772 11/29/04 17.40 0.00 17.40 170- 031775 11/29/04 82.90 0.00 82.90 170-031849 11/30/04 25.67 0.00 25.67 170- 031051 11/30/04 96.41 0.00 96.41 110- 031850 11/30/04 25.08 0.00 25.08 170- 031922 11/30/04 8.58 0.00 8.58 130- 032035 12/01104 1538 0.00 15.88 170- 032241 12/02/04 7.34 0.00 7.34 170-033536 12/16/04 5.85 0.00 5.85 170- 031392 11/23/04 299.52 0.00 299.52 170- 032239 12/02/04 26.92 0.00 26.92 170- 032289 12/03/04 399.96 0.00 399.96 170- 032302 12103/04 78.31 0.00 78.31 170- 032314 12/03/04 76.25 0.00 76.25 110- 032570 12/06104 103.34 0.00 103.34 170-032981 12/10/04 56.46 0.00 56.46 170- 033322 12/14/04 244.95 0.00 244.95 170-033335 12/14/04 46.90 0.00 46.90 170- 033380 12/14/04 142.58 0.00 142.58 1110- 033395 12/14/04 28.60 0.00 28.60 170- 033473 12/15/04 75.45 0.00 75.45 170- 033407 12/15/04 13.46 0.00 13.46 170- 033488 12/15/04 47.88 0.00 47.88 170- 033535 12/15/04 20.67 0.00 20.67 170-033544 12/16104 38.67 0.00 30.67 170-033560 12/16/04 49.92 0.00 49.92 170-033735 12/17/04 34.02 0.00 34.02 170-033901 12/20/04 100.01 0.00 108.81 170- 033904 12/20/04 62.44 0.00 62.44 170-034248 12/22104 46.80 0.00 46.08 170-034249 12/22/04 46.08 0.00 46.88 170-034250 12/22/04 46.88 0.00 46.80 170- 034743 12/29/04 282.86 0.00 282.86 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 130-58 -5210 2,665.32 1 EA 'ANNUAL-FY2004 /05' AUTO PARTS & SUPPLIES PO Liquidation Amount 130 -58 -5210 2,665.32 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of 0aldw)D Park Feb (N, 2005 08:34am Page 10 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/89/9900 Omok/A0 0'o 14807 to 140909 Payment Type Check __________________________________________________________________________ Vondl Vendor Name Ro@ tt Payee ` Bank Check Chk Date Check Amount Sep 5544 CAR WASH DEPOT No 148656' 01/27/05 54.50 Claixl General Description 65592 NOV CAR WASHES PO# Stat Q0tractl INmicm# Iom 0t Gross Amount 0immmd Amt Uionmmt Used Not Amount 11633 O NOV CAR WASHES 11/22/04 54.50 ' 0.00 54.50 8L Distribution Gross Amount Work Orden# 6ctCd Description 130-58'5210 54.50 1 [A 'ANNUAL-FY2004/05* CAR WASHES FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT VEHICLES PO Liquidation Amount 130-58'5210 54,50 ___________________________________________________________________ Vend# Vendor Name Remdt Payee Dank Cheok& Chk Date Qmok Amount 3oy 7141 CCPON AP 148657 01/27/05 60,00 Cloim0 General Description 65501 Z005 RENEWAL LILIANA RUBIO MARICELA MONTENEGRO PO#Stat ContractiInvo1cel Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/26105 60.00 0.00 60.00 SL Distribution Smno Amount Work N"der8 kotCd Description 150'00-2151 60.00 K RU0I01M MONTENEGRO __—_'__________'--'____—_______'___—'_______—__—___—___—__—_____—_—_' V8nd0 Vendor Name RRN1ttP6yeo Bank ChOokV Chk [gtV Check Amount Sep 6007 CEH RECOVERY SERVICES AP 148658 01/27/05 3.750.00 Cloim0 General Description 65580 JULY-DEC POI 3tatContracti Invohce# Dnvc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12231 U 0 01/26/05 3,750.00 0.00 3.750,00 SL Distribution NnSS Amount Work Urder# Ad[d Description 10-43-5050'071 3,750,00 JLY'0EC PO Liquidation Amount 120-43'5050'071 3.750.00 _______________________________________________________________ Wmd# Vendor Name R80%8 Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Soy 2033 C[LSOC AP 148658 01/27/05 88,51 Cla|ml General Description 65593 SUBDIV MAP ACT PO# Stat Coo ra±0 Im0ice# Invc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net AN0Uot 0 01/26/05 88.51 0,00 88.51 SL Distribution 8mS8 Amount Work Urdor# A(tCd Description 100-52-5340 88,51 '05 SU0DIV MAP ACT ____________________________________________________________ CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) QTy Ct oaiawm vmg P(* VU, Zuub VV:34aN Page 11 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check/AGHI's 148627 to 140909 Payment Type Check _____________________________________________________________________________ V»ndf Vendor Name R9m t8 Payee Bank Check# Qkk Date Check Amount Sep 7654 CHARLOTTE MADRIGAL AP 148660 01/27/06 15.00 C&imK General Description 65594 REFUND TEEN TRIP MAGIC NT Claiml General Description 65596 KOV/DECD0 WASHES PO# Stat Contract0 lnvo1cel Invc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt 0no00t Used Net Amount 1106 U ^- 0 12/01/04 481.95 0L00 481.95 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rdnr@ AotCd Description 130-50-010 401.95 1 EA *ANNUAL-R2004/05^ WASHING POLICE DEPARTMENT AND CITY VEHICLES P0 Liquidation Amount 138-58'9210 481.05 -----'—'-'---'--''—'---'--''------''-'-------'-'--'''--------------'-----------'--'---'-''-----'-'- Vond0 Vendor Name Rem\t# Payee Bank Ch8ck# Ckk Date Check Amount Sep 247 CLIPPlNSEK CHEVROLET AP 14860 01/27/05 770,50 Cbin# General Description 6507 AUTO PARTS/REPAIRS POI8bd Conr8C0I0mim0 PO# 3bd Cootraci0 Invoice# Iovu 0t Snm» Amount Discount Amt 0ioommt Used Net Amount CVN 10439 11/01/04 V 01/u/05 15.00 CVW014541 0.00 0.00 CVC3406229 12122/04 SL Distribution 8moS Amount Work Orderf &dCd Description Gross Amount 130-58'5270 770.59 150'00'2172 15,00 REFUND-MAGIC MT ___________________________________________________________________ Vond# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Chootf Qhk 0ot8 Check Amount Sep 7635 CHIN CH0N YEE AP 148661 01/27/05 18.00 CI8i0# General Description 85595 REFUND-SR TRIP (TI.0AW6) PO# Stat Cuntr3ot# Imm|oef Invo 0t SrnSo Amount 0ia(muot Amt 8iunnuot Used Not Amount 0 01/26/05 18.00 0,00 18.00 0L Distribution Gross Amount Work Ordor# AntCd Description 150'00-2169 18.00 REFUND-TJ ' _____________________________________________________________________ Vend# Vendor Name Remit0 Payee Bank 0wck# Ckk [mto Check Amount Sop 3054 CITRUS CAR WASH Nz 140662 01/27/05 481,95 Claiml General Description 65596 KOV/DECD0 WASHES PO# Stat Contract0 lnvo1cel Invc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt 0no00t Used Net Amount 1106 U ^- 0 12/01/04 481.95 0L00 481.95 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rdnr@ AotCd Description 130-50-010 401.95 1 EA *ANNUAL-R2004/05^ WASHING POLICE DEPARTMENT AND CITY VEHICLES P0 Liquidation Amount 138-58'9210 481.05 -----'—'-'---'--''—'---'--''------''-'-------'-'--'''--------------'-----------'--'---'-''-----'-'- Vond0 Vendor Name Rem\t# Payee Bank Ch8ck# Ckk Date Check Amount Sep 247 CLIPPlNSEK CHEVROLET AP 14860 01/27/05 770,50 Cbin# General Description 6507 AUTO PARTS/REPAIRS POI8bd Conr8C0I0mim0 Imm0 12O33 0 CVW010161 10/25/04 CVN 10439 11/01/04 CVCS405505 12/02/04 CVW014541 12/13/04 CVC3406229 12122/04 CV0406561 12/22/04 GL Distribution Gross Amount 130-58'5270 770.59 PO Liquidation Amount 130-58'5270 770.59 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 119.13 0.00 10.13 114.81 0.00 114.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 64,78 0.00 04.79 39439 0.00 304.80 76,08 0.04 76.88 Work 0rderf AntCd Description 1 [k 'ANNUAL—R2004/05' POLICE AND CITY VEHICLE PARTS AND REPAIRS By SANDRA A (SANDRA) GUY Of batOolin FarK Feb Ud, Z005 UU :J4am rage 13 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00 /00 /0000 to 90/99/9999 Check /ACH # °s 148627 to 148909 Payment Type Check ----------------------------------------------------_------_-------_-----------__-------------------------------------------.-------- Vend# Vendor dame Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 3827 COLLEGIATE PACIFIC AP 148664 01/27/05 884.92 Claim# General Description 65598 FOX40 CLASSIC WHISTLE BLK POI Stat Contract# Invoice# 0227108 GL Distribution 150 -00 -2154 Claim# General Description 65599 YTH SOCCER /BSKTBL SUPPLIES Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 01117/05 37.90 0.00 3730 Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 37.90 FOX 40 CLASSIC WHISTLE BLK PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12293 C 0246698 12/29/04 847.02 0.00 847.02 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 150 -00 -2154 847.02 1 EA YOUTH SOCCER & BASKETBALL SUPPLIES PO Liquidation Amount 150 -00 -2154 847.02 Vend# Vendor dame Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 2388 COMMUNICATIONS CENTER AP 148665 01/27105 1,906.25 Claim# General Description 65590 RADIO MAINT PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11578 0 50071 01/01/05 1,350.00 0.00 1,350.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -28 -5000 1,350.00 1 EA °ANNUAL- FY2004/05* MONTHLY MAINTENANCE OF POLICE RADIO EQUIPMENT PO Liquidation Amount 100 -28 -5000 11350.00 Clair# General Description 65600 RADIO SERV /SUPPLIES PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Ot Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12274 C 44888 12109/04 47.50 0.00 47.50 44871 12/08/04 541.25 0.00 541.25 44825 12/02/04 47.50 0.00 47.50 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100-28 -5210 636.25 1 EA INVOICE #44825 & 444871 SERVICE & SUPPLIES FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT RADIO SYSTEM PO Liquidation Amount 100 - 28-5210 588.75 _..-_----------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N'APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) ^/^y v' v*^ nm nu« nm "o, mm vo`ivum rdqu /v Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check/ACHI's 148627 to 148909 Payment Type Check ___________________________________________________________________________ V8Odf Vendor Name Re0it0 Payee Bank Cheo # Chk Uoh/ 0*xk Amount Sep 2466 COMPLETE CHARTER LINES AP 148666 01/27/05 250.00 CIaix0 General Description 65601 SR TRIP 2/3/05 POI Stad Contract# Immicef Invc [t Gross kmnUDt Discount Amt 8ioummt Used Not Amount V 01/26/05 250.00 0.00 250.00 8L Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# kctCd Description 117'55-5000-055 250.00 SR TRIP 2/3/05 ______________________________________________________________________ Vond8 Vendor Name RoNit8 Payee Bank Ck8Ck0 Chk BQto Qmok Amount Sop 7660 C0HSERY AP 148667 01/27/05 65.75 Claiml General Description 65761 STOPWATCH REPA�S PO#3tat Contract#Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount KJ-4532754 01/14/05 65.75 0.00 65.75 8L Distribution GmoS Amount Work Ordm^ AotCd Description 100-72-5210 65,75 STOPWATCH REPAIRS ' ____-______—____—____—____-___________-_________-____________—_-____' V0nd0 Vendor Name Rem%X Payee Bank Omuk0 Chk Date Omok Amount Sep 6506 COOPER DDIVERY SERVICE AP 148668 01/27/05 94.50 Cb1N0 General Description 65602 DELIVERY SRV POI Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11775 O - 200500000 01/04/05 94.50 0.00 94.50 GL Distribution SmoS Amount Work Order# kCtCd 0nocr|yt1nO 100-04-5010 &4.50 1 EA ^AKNUAL-FY2004105^ WEEKLY DELIVERY T0 THE CITY ATTORNEY (MAIL & 6SEN0k PACKETS) P0 Liquidation Amount 100-04'5010 94.50 --'_'-''---____'_-_-_'_'-'--_'__-_-_'_'----'-__-_'-__-_'_'_--__-_-_-____-____-_-_'_-_---'-'- V0Od# Vendor Name Rom|t8 Payee Bank Ckmnk0 Chk Date Check Amount Sep 2127 CORRECTIONAL SYSTEMS, INC. C/O FIR AP 148688 01/27/05 34,47036 Quiml General Description 85603 DEC JAIL 3ERV POI Stad Omb^mt# Immioo0 Invc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Not Amount 11562 0 8PARK 123104 01/05/05 34,47036 0~00 34,470.96 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order0AutCdDescription 100'22-5000 34,470.06 i E6 ^kNNUA -FY 004/05^ JAIL SERVICES PO Liquidation Amount 108-22'5000 34.470,96 _____________________________________________________________________ CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 fl*APR1100 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) uty ct oamwm mrx ron vo, mo ou-,)9dfU I'dge m Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 90/99/9909 Chmnk/A0#'o 14007 to 140900 Payment Type Check -------'—'-------------------'--------------------------'----'----------'—' Vendf Vendor Name Remit&Payee BankCheck0 ChkDato Check Amount Sep 509 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT OF LOS AP 148670 011217/05 03.60 Clo|m0 General Nmm^iPtioU 65677 WASTEWATER SERV 04/05 P0# 5tat CuVtroo # I0m|ce# Iwm [t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0K15-8544019917'021 01/07/05 633,60 0,00 633.60 GL Distribution 8mnS Amount Work Urdorf AdCU Description 102'42-5050-013 03.60 WASTEWATER 88V 04/05 ____________________________________________________________________ Vond# Vendor Name Romit0 Payee Bank Chook0 Ckk Date Check Amount Soy 7598 COURTYARD UN0I0TT 06LUWIN PARK AP 148671 01/27/05 91920.00 Oa|UN General Description 65604 EUPLY REC DINNER 1/21/05 PO#3tat Contract0 Dnvoicef Iwm Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12155 01/21/05 9,920.00 0.00 9'920.00 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order0 ACtCd Description 100'81-5330 91920.00 EMPLY REC DINNER 01/21/05 ____________________________________________________________________ Vondf Vendor Hamm Re@it0 Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 181 CPR3 2 CPR5 AP 148672 01/27/05 20.00 Claimf General Description 65583 KE6lSl-PKISCILA 0NIb\ CP85 DISJ IX |RN6 01/20/05 POI Stat Contract#Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount . ' A 01/26/05 20.00 0.00 20.00 8i Distribution &mem Amount Work Order# ACtCd Description 100'02-5330 0.00 P D&YILA 01/20/05 _____________________________________________________________________ V8Od0 Vendor Name Romitt Payee Bank Q`8ok0 Ckk Date Check Amount Sep 7045 CYNTHIA KEIFl[R FLOR0 0U&; MAHIAC AP 148673 01127/05 144,A ClaiU0 General 0mmriNLk0 65606 MAR XCHO CLASSES 01117/04-02/07105 PON Stad Cootract# Imm1ceW Invc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11576 O 0 01/26/05 144.58 0.00 144.38 SL Distribution GmoS Amount Work Order# 8CtCd Description 1150'00-2172 1144.38 1 EA *ANNUAL-R2004/05^ CONTRACT SERVICES TO PROVIDE MXRIACHI CLASSES PO Liquidation 8n0KDt 150-00'2172 144.38 --'---''-------'-'-----'---'''--'----'---'-''''--''---'---'-----'-----------'—'-----'----------'-'' GCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.5 N^APR A0 By SANDRA & (SANDRA) Qty of 0aidwm parK Feb oU, Zmm vu:54am Page it Payment History. Bank AP Payment Bates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check/ACH#'s 140627 to 140909 Payment Type Check _______________________________________________________________________________ Wend0 Vendor Name Remitt Payee Bank Check8 Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7147 08R OFFICE WORKS ZNG AP 140674 01/27fO5 647.34 O3im# General Description 65607 STORAGE CABINET POI Stat Contract# Invo|cel Imc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net k0Ou0t 12292 C 0063986 12/09/04 647.34 0.00 647.34 8L Distribution 6muo Amount Work 0rder# AdCd Description ` 100-0-5409 647.34 i Eh INVOICE #0063986-IN STORAGE CA8IMET FOR POLICE DEPT STAFF P0 Liquidation Amount 100-24'5409 08.00 -''-''-------'------'-''—'—'---'---'----'-----'----'-'—'----'------''-----------'---'-----------'''-'- Vond# Vendor Name Rnmit0 Payee Bank Chook# Chk Date Check Amount Soy 2704 DAVID REYK8SO AP 148675 01/27/05 55.56 Claim# General Description 65608 REIMB MONTHLY EXPENSES PO#Stad Contract# Immiuo# Imm[t 0 0i/26/05 GL Distribution Gross Amount 150-00-2187 50.96 _______________________________ VeOd0 Vendor Q3No ReN1t0 Payee 7636 DELORA MARS Claim# General Description 65Q0 REFUND-SR TRIP O3JUAN6 � Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 50.96 0.00 0.00 Work Order0 kCt0 Description RElM8 0P ______________________________________________________ Bank Ch8Ck0 Chk Date Check Amount Sep 6P 148676 01/27/05 18.00 POI Stat Contracti Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Not Amount 0 01/26/05 18.00 0,00 18.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Orderf Act0 Description 150-00-2169 18.00 REFUND _________________________________________________________________________________ VoDd# Vendor Name Rem|t0 Payee Bank QmCk0 Chk Date Check Amount Sep 296 DEPT OF CONSERVATION DIV OF ADMIN AP 148677 01/27/05 472.00 Cla1n0 General Description 65586 SNO OCT '04-DEC '04 PO# 3tad Con racti Immiuo& {mm Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/26105 472,00 0.00 471.00 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order0 Aot0 Description 100-00-068 211.00 SKI OCT-DEC 104 100-00-070 01.00 SUI OCT-DEC `04 _'_____________'__—____-_-____'—___-________________—__-__________-_-_' CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of UaidWiA Y6rk �eb UU, ZND 08:34am Page D Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check/ACHI's 149627 to 140909 Payment Type Check ----------------------------------`—`—`----~-------------------`-------------`—`--- Vend# Vendor Kamm Rem|t0 Payee Bank (hunky Chk Date Check Amount Soy 707 DONALD TH0UPS0N AP 148678 01/27/05 15.00 ClaimA General Description 65610 REFUND-MAGIC MT P00 Stot Cmntr3o # INmiCo0 Ims Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt 0ioCm0t Used Net Amount � N/26/05 15.00 0,00 15.00 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rderV &otCd Description 150'00-2172 15,00 REFUND _____________________________________________________________________ Vond0 Vendor Name RB0it# Payee G6Uk 0eok0 Chk Date Omok Amount Soy 74,56 EDWARD A LULEYITCH AP 148679 01/27/05 21800.00 CIaixl General Description 65760 CONSULTING SRN 01/10105-01/13/05 01/17/05-01/20/05 PO0 Stat CODtrmtW I0miceW Invc [t Gross Amount 01aommt Amt Discount Used Net 60OUnt CBP0120 01/20/05 1.400,00 0.00 1'400.00 CBPOi13 01/13V05 1,400.00 0.00 1,400,00 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work Drder# Act0 0oSCriytinD 100-12-5030 1,848,00 1/10-13/05 1/17-1/20/05 101'12-5030-020 224.00 1/10-13105 1/17'1/20D05 101-12'5030-025 224.00 1/10'13/05 1/17'1/20/05 117'12'5030-050 112.00 SRN 1/10-13/05 1/17-20/05 118-12'5030-005 112.00 SRV 1/10-13/05 1117-20/05 131'12-5030-000 00,00 SRV 1/10-13/05 1/14-20/05 __—____--__—_—'_'__—_—'—__--___'_--_-___-_—_--_-________—__'_--__-___--_'____— Vend Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank 08ck0 Chk Date Check Amount Sep 6994 EL JACAL AP 140680 01/27/05 270.63 Cl3ix# General Description 65611 CATERING SRV POI 8tad C0n racti IDvuio80 IDvC Ut Gross Amount Discount Amt Uinommt Used Net A00UUt 0 O1/26/05 270.63 0.00 270.0 SL Distribution GmSu Amount Work Order# AdCd Description 100'75-5210 270.65 CATERING SRV ___________________________________________________________________ Vnnd8 Vendor Name Ramit# Payee Dank Omok0 Chk Date Check Amount Sop 7638 ESTELLA J/WREGHI AP 148681 01/27/05 15J0 QaNW General Description 65612 REFUND-MAGIC MT PO#Stat Contract#I00ice# IwmDt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/26/05 15.00 0,00 15.00 SL Distribution Gmon Amount Work N~der# ACtCd Description 150-00-2172 15,00 REFUND --------------------------------------------------------------------- CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3N*APR708 8y SANDRA 4 (SANDRA) city of oatawin warx reb uu, zuu� uosjuam page 18 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Oates 00 /00 /0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #'s 148627 to 148909 Payment Type Check ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7089 ESTRADA'S SMOG CHECK AP 148682 01/27/05 1,029.00 Claim# General Description 65613 SMOG TESTS PO# Stat Contract6 Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12282 0 5416 12/25/04 36.75 0.00 36.75 5042 12/24/04 36.75 0.00 36.75 5398 12/27/04 36.75 0.00 36.75 5396 12/27/04 36.75 0.00 36.75 5409 12/28/04 36.75 0.00 36.75 5411 12/28/04 36.75 0.00 36.75 5419 12/28/04 36.75 0.00 336.75 5423 12/28/04 36.75 0.00 36.75 5427 12/28/04 36.75 4.00 36.75 5428 12/29/04 36.75 0.00 36.75 5433 12/29/04 36.75 0.00 36.75 5435 12/29/04 36.75 0.00 36.75 5438 12/29/04 36.75 0.00 36.75 5439 12/29/04 36.75 0.00 36.75 5440 12/29/04 36.75 0.00 36.75 5441 12/29/04 36.75 0.00 36.75 5455 12/30/04 36.75 0.00 36.75 5456 12/30/04 36.75 0.00 36.75 5459 12/30/04 36.75 0.00 36.75 5460 12/30/04 36.75 0.00 36,75 5461 12/30/04 36.75 0.00 36.75 5462 12/30/04 36.75 0.00 36.75 _5463 12/30/04 36.75 0.00 36.75 5472 12/31/04 336.75 0.00 36.75 5473 12/31/04 36.75 0.00 36.75 5475 12/31/04 36.75 4.00 36.75 5479 12/31/04 36.75 0.00 36.75 5485 01/03105 36.75 0.00 36.75 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 130 -58 -5270 1,029.00 1 EA 'ANNUAL-FY2004 /05* SMOG CHECKS (30 TOTAL) PO Liquidation Amount 130- 58-5270 1,029.00 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 797 EXPERIAN AP 148684# 01/27/05 75.84 Claim# General Description 65615 CREDIT REPORTS PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Grass Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount CD5090006441 12/31/04 75.84 0.00 75.84 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 120 -43- 5030 -030 75.84 CREDIT REPORTS CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) r,zry ur Luiiuwiii raiA rvu vu, cvvi vua,rnaw ra +v 19 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00100 /0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACHI`s 148627 to 148909 Payment Type Check ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------ - - - - -- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 3810 EXXON MOBIL FLEET /GECC AP 148685 01/27/05 807.05 Claim# General Description 65614 FUEL PURCHASES POI Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12157 0 6399807 12/15/04 807.05 0.00 807.05 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 130 -58 -5210 807.05 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2004 /05' FUEL PURCHASES (CREDIT CARDS ISSUED TO POLICE DEPARTMENT & DETECTIVE PERSONNEL) PO Liquidation Amount 130-58-5210 807.05 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.----------------------------------------- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 348 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP AP 148686 01/27/05 113.48 Claim# General Description 65616 EXPRESS MAIL TRKGI843267609094 POI Stat Contract# Invoice# 7131 -59832 GL Distribution 100 -12 -5210 Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12/31/04 53.39 0.00 53.39 Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 53.39 B43267609094 Claim# General Description 65617 EXPRESS MAIL 823089753232- $32.93 823088753254- 27.16 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 7- 956 -37234 01/14/05 60.69 0.00 60.09 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Orderl ActCd Description 106 -25 -5210 32.93 023088753232 100 -25 -5210 27.16 823088753254 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.-------- Vendl Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 379 GALLS /L.B. UNIFORM CO AP 140687 01/27/05 2,003.79 Claim #General Description 65618 UNIFORM SUPPLIES . PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12275 C 652151 11/29/04 3.23 0.00 3.23 645940 10/29/04 432.95 0.06 432.95 645654 10/29104 107.63 030 107.63 645652 10/29/04 432.95 0.00 432.95 64564B 10128/04 165.47 0.00 165.47 652919 12/02/04 941.56 0.00 941.56 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -25 -5210 2 ,083.79 1 EA UNIFORM SUPPLIES FOR POLICE OFFICERS PO Liquidation Amount 100-25 -5210 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2,083.79 - - - - -- CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N'APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) city of r }aidwin rarK ! eb os, Z00b Uit AH Page 20 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACHI's 148627 to 148909 Payment Type Check ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vendt Vendor Name Remitt Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 1510 GCS WESTERN POWER EQUIPMENT AP 148688 01/27/05 918.87 Glaimt General Description 65619 SERV /PARTS POt Stat Contractt Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11640 0 X60319 12/20/04 893.17 0.00 893.17 X68345 12/20/04 25.70 0.00 25.70 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 130 -58 -5270 918.87 1 EA 'ANNUAL- FY2004 /05* SERVICE & PARTS FOR UNIT 15091 PO Liquidation Amount 130 -58 -5270 918.87 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remitt Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 4328 GE CAPITAL AP 148689 01/27/05 211.09 Claimt General Description 65620 JAN -LEASE PMT CANON IR3300 POt Stat Contractt Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11759 0 60523480 12/22/04 211.09 0.00 211.09 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 131 -14- 5760-062 211.09 1 EA 'ANNUAL- FY2004/05' LEASE PAYMENTS FOR CANON IR3300 IN FINANCE AREA, ACCOUNT 14204136-001, SERIAL #MPH46607 PO Liquidation Amount 131 -14 -5760 -062 211.09 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7614 GENERAL PUMP COMPANY AP 148690 01/27/05 2,241.09 Claim# General Description 65621 EMERGENCY ELECTRICAL REPAIRS PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12283 C 8010 11/30/04 2 ,241.09 0.00 2,241.09 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActC4 Description 114 -61- 5210 -094 2,241.09 1 EA EMERGENCY ELECTRICAL REPAIRS @ PUENTE AVE PUMP STATION (NOT TO EXCEED $2,250) PO Liquidation Amount 114 -61 -5210 -094 2,250.00 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 5438 GLENDALE CENTRE THEATRE AP 148691 01/23/05 448.00 Claim# General Description 65622 SR TRIP 02/10/05 POt Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/26/05 448.00 0.00 448.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 150 -00 -2169 440.00 SR TRIP 2/10/05 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) Uty Of Ua1NwD FarX �uo vo, mou vu:�qam Page O Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check/ACHI's 140627 to 149909 Payment Type Check ______________________________________________________________________________ V*nJ0 Vendor Name Remitf Payee Bank Omck# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7639 GLORIA SUUGZ AP 148692 01/27/05 15,00 Oaim# General Description 65623 REFUND-MAGIC MT PO# Stat Con rm±# Immie0 lmc 0L Sr8oa Amount Discount Amt 0ioommt Used Net Amount V 01/26/05 15.00 0.00 15.00 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work N.dnr0 AotCd Description 150-00-2172 15.00 REFUND-MAGIC MT ___________________________________________________________________ Vendf Vendor Name Remitf Payee Dank CheCk# Chk [late Check Amount Sep 7640 GLORIA OLIVES AP 148693 01/27/05 18.00 Cl3ixl General Description 65624 REFUND SR TRIP (TIJUANA) POI Stad Sont0o f IVvOice# Invc [t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Not Amount 0 01/26/05 18.00 0.00 18.00 SL Distribution 8nmG Amount Work 0rderU AotCd Description 150-00-2169 0.00 REFUND ____________________________________________________________________ Vond# Vendor Name ReN|t# Payee Bank CkoCkf Chk Date Check Amount Soy 3608 GMF SOUND, INC AP 148604 01/27/05 450.00 QaiV# General Description 65651 RELOCATE-0SI TIYE LISTENING/INTERPRETATION ARRAY POI Stat Contractf Invo/ce# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 2ffi0 10/22/04 450,00 — 0,00 450.40 SL Distribution G0So Amount Work Order8 AriCd 88oCriyiiOO 131-13-5724-145 450.00 RELOCATE LISTENING ARRAY _____________________________________________________________________ Vend# Vendor Name Rom|tf Payee Bank 08ok8 Chk Date Check Amount Sep 400 SKAlNGER, INC. 1 GRAINGEB DEPT 440-823334693 AP 148695 01/27/05 857.54 Claia0 General Description 5505 MISC SUPPLIES POfStat Contract0Invoicef lnvc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11641 C 457'058415-3 12/08/04 38.90 0.00 36.98 457-126708-1 12/09/04 86.07 0,00 86,0 457'361345'4 12/13/04 6.90 0.00 6.98 SL Distribution 8rmm Amount Work 0rdnrV AutCd Description 130'58-010 130.03 1 EA ^ANNDA -FY2NN/0S^ SMALL TOOLS RN MAINTENANCE & REPAIR ITE MS 0R THE CITY YARD GARAGE PO Liquidation Amount 130-59-5218 129.76 0ainN General Description 65626 MISC SUPPLIES PO# Stat Co8tr6C # Invninef Ime 0L Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11714 0 457'023/2'3 12/20104 71.72 0.00 71.72 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) Wly 4Y D'dIOWlll Fdf'H reD Va, LUUD Va :,qdW rage LL Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/9919999 Check /ACH #'s 948627 to 148909 Payment Type Check Claim[ General Description 65629 SRV 1/20/05 - 02/99/05 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 44884 GL Distribution 131 -13 -5260 ---------------------------------------- Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 01/20/05 17.00 0.00 17.00 Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 17.00 02120105- 02/19/05 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - -- CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) 457- 266596 -8 12/28104 244.79 0.00 244.79 457- 4337173 -0 01103/04 41.76 0.00 41.76 457 - 541320 -1 01/04/05 42.11 0.00 42.11 457-45 3643-3 01/07/05 53.13 0.00 53.13 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100-57-5210 0.00 1 EA °ANNUAL- FY2004/05' ELECTRICAL PARTS # SUPPLIES, GENERAL FUND PORTION 127 -57 -5210 453.51 1 EA PARKS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PORTION PO Liquidation Amount 127-57 -5210 453.51 Claim# General Description 65627 NISC SUPPLIES POI Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 19715 0 457- 853683 -3 01/07/05 94.23 0.00 94.23 457-174640-5 01/12/05 55.32 0.00 55.32 457- 144750 -5 09/15104 124.85 0.00 124.85 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -57- 5210 -211 274.40 1 EA #ANNUAL- FY2004 /05t ELECTRICAL PARTS & SUPPLIES AT TEEN CENTER PO Liquidation Amount 100-57- 5210 -211 274.40 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7641 GUADALUPE RODRIGUEZ AP 148696 01/27/05 15.00 Claim# General Description 65628 REFUND -MAGIC MT POI Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/26/05 15.00 0.00 15.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 150 -00 -2172 15.00 REFUND Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 4182 GUS NETWORKS, INC. AP 148697 01/27/05 17.40 Claim[ General Description 65629 SRV 1/20/05 - 02/99/05 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 44884 GL Distribution 131 -13 -5260 ---------------------------------------- Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 01/20/05 17.00 0.00 17.00 Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 17.00 02120105- 02/19/05 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - -- CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) ,..1 ~ ~~.... .~. .= ,", ^",^ ,".~=m ,az1~ ^" Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check/ACH#'s 149627 to 148909 Payment Type Check ___—_---'__'_-_'_____-__-_-______—__--_____--__---__—_---_'__-__-_'____-_-__— V8nd0 Vendor Name ' Remit0 Payee Dank 0eckf Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7565 GYNSOURCE AP 146698 01/27/05 5.474.51 Ooim# General Description 65630 CY0EX SIGMA-R RECUMBENT CYCLE POW Stat Cmntroc # Im0icel Imc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt 0iaC0mt Used Net Amount 12179 C 491943 12/22/04 5.474.51 0.00 5,474.51 SL 0iotr\kotimU SmSS Amount Work Urder# Act0 Description 100'72-5220 5'474.51 2 [A CY0% SIGMA-R RECUMBENT CYCLE PO Liquidation Amount 100'72'5220 ___________________________________________________________________ 5,474.51 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Ckooki Chk Date Check Amount 3wP 5062 HARRIS COMPUTER SYSTEMS AP 148699 01/27/05 1,405,00 Claiml General Description 65832 FED TECH ASSISTANCE PO# Stad CVotract# Invuice# Invx Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11560 0 MH000549 01101/05 1,405.00 0.80 1'405.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order0 ActCd Description 131-13-5260 1,405.00 1 EA ^&NNU&L'FY2004/051 FINANCIAL AND PAYROLL SYSTEM TECHNICAL SUPPORT I MAINTENANCE, CUSTOMER ID #BAL01 P0 Liquidation Amount 131-13'5260 1,40500 _______--_-__-_-_-_—_--____--_____--_'_-_—_'_---___-__--____''-_—__-_—_—___-_—___ Vend0 Vendor Name RemitU Payee Bank CWmk# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7642 HERMAN WEISSLER, INC ATTN: STEVE D AP 148700 01/27/05 330.00 Claim0 General Description 65633 REFUND CID PRG (ATIT HUT DEMO FOSTER AV) PO0Stat Contract0Dnvo|ce# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount V 01/26/05 330.00 0.00 330.00 SL 8iotr1hotimo S0Sn Amount Work 0rderV AntCd Description 129'00-2075 31A .00 REFUND C&0 PRG ___________________________________________________________________ V8ndf Vendor Name Remit& Payee Bank OmCkV Chk Date 0mCk Amount Sep 7643 H[RMILA HEBNANDE2 8P 148701 01/27/05 15,00 Claiml General Description 65634 REFUND-MAGIC MT P00 3tat Contract0 INmicef Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net &0oUVt 0 01/26/05 15.00 0.00 15,00 SL Distribution 8mSu Amount Work Nrder# AotCJ Description 150-00-2172 15.00 REFUND _________________________—_____________________________-__________- CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA (SANDRA) I, 16y Ut Vd1UWIII rdf K fCU VUy GUVU V0;J4dflf rdUt 14 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /AGH #`s 140627 to 148909 Payment Type Check ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 4878 HOME DEPOT AP 148702 01/27/05 1,227.98 Claim# General Description 65635 (1ISC SUPPLIES POI Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12244 0 8596495 11/29/04 82.10 0.00 82.10 7226689 11/30/04 194.55 0.00 194.55 7226690 11/30104 199.92 0.00 199.92 7226691 11/30/04 27.02 0.00 27.02 6575600 12/01/04 39.44 0.00 39.44 6581843 12/01/04 138.13 0.00 138.13 5575679 12/02/04 26.72 0.00 26.72 4226832 12/03/04 54.47 0.00 54.47 4238102 12/03/04 25.87 0.00 25.87 106461 12/07/04 96.62 0.00 96.62 9106483 12/08/04 2836 0.00 28.86 9166943 12/08/04 54.00 0.00 54.00 7107049 12/20/04 98.99 0.00 98.99 7107050 12/20104 161.29 0.00 161.29 GL Distribution Grass Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100-72 -5210 371.08 1 EA 'ANNUAL- FY2004/05' MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES, RECREATION SERVICES PORTION 100-73 -5210 96.62 1 EA SENIOR SERVICES PORTION 100-76 -•5210 260.28 1 EA TEEN CENTER PORTION 150 -00 -2172 500.00 1 EA DONATIONS PORTION PO Liquidation Amount 100 -72 -5210 371.08 100 -73- 5210 96.62 100 - 76-5210 260.28 150.00 -2172 500.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7644 HORTENSE & LOUIE COLMENERO AP 148703 01/27/05 336.00 Claim# General Description 65636 (REFUND SR TRIP (TIJUANA) PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/26/05 36.00 0.00 3630 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 150 -00 -2169 36.00 REFUND --------..--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 452 HOSE-MAN INC AP 148704 01/27105 36.16 Claim# General Description 65637 MISC SUPPLIES PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11642 0 2106511-0001 -02 12/21/04 36.16 0.00 36.16 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 130 -58 -5270 36.16 1 EA 'ANNUAL-FY2004 /05' EMERGENCY HYDRAULIC HOSE REPAIR CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N'APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) 41 LY UP Dd IOW III I'd[ K ruu VO, LVVU V0;J4d111 t'd�C L"J Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Cheek /ACH #'s 148627 to 145909 Payment Type Check PO Liquidation Amount 130 -58 -5270 36.16 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 346 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING RIGHTS AP 148705 01/27/05 1,18230 Claim# General Description 65638 DECEMBER SRV PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12235 0 0 01/26/05 1,182.00 0.00 1,18230 GL Distribution Gross Amount Rork Order# ActCd Description 120 -43- 5050 -160 1,182.00 1 EA °ANNUAL- FY2004/05t FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL PO Liquidation Amount 120 - 43-5050 -160 1,182.00 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 469 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHIEF AP 148706 01/27/05 200.00 Claim# General Description 65639 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL LT MICHAEL H DAVIS PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 418591 GL Distribution 100 -25 -5240 Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12/31/04 100.00 0.00 100.00 Gross Amount Work Order# ActC4 Description 100.00 DUE; -M DAVIS Claim# General Description 65644 MEMBERSHIP '05 MARK P KLING ID# 1582496 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 1582495 12/31/04 100.00 0.00 100.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -25 -5240 100.00 DUES -M KLING Vend# Vendor (dame Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 3795 IGTC AP 146707 01/27/05 240.00 Claim# General Description 65640 REGIST 02/09/05 JACK WONG MELECIO PICAZO POI Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/26/05 240.00 0.00 240.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 101- 415330 120.00 J BONG, M PICAZO 101-40-5330 -025 120.00 M PICAZO CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) �,ny m oamwm f1dr-K rxo on' cmo oo;»*om I'dge m Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0080 to 08/90/5999 Chank/8CH#'o 14007 to 140909 Payment Type Check ____________________________________ Vend Vendor Name Remit0 Payee 463 INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF UUNlCIP Claim0 General Description 65041 MEMBERSHIP THRU 3/31/05 ROSEMARY RAUIREZ _________________________________________ Bank ChoCk8 Ckk Date Check Amount Say AP 148708 01/27/05 91.00 PO# Stat Coo rutf Inv ice# Invc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 19719 01/10/05 91.00 0.00 91.00 SL 8|s%rik8timo Gross Amount Work Nrder# kCtCd Description 100-03-5240 91.00 DUES-R RAUI0EZ ___________________________________________________________________ Vond0 Vendor Name Remitf Payee Bank ChmCk8 Ckk Date Qmok Amount 8oy 5751 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES AP 148789 01/27/05 29�.54 Claimf General Description 65642 RENT IMAGRNR 10/15/03-11/14/04 PO# Std COn ractA Immico0 Imm [t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11973 O 64206796 12/71/04 164.44 0.00 164.44 8L Distribution Sruoo Amount Work Urder8 AotCd Description 131-14-6760'00 0.00 1 [k ^ANNUA -PD(N4/05^ CANON IR1600 COPIER LEAS P&YMENTS, SERIAL IMQS02343[841S, CITY YARN 131-14-600-060 164.44 1 EA MAINTENANCE PORTION PO Liquidation Amount 131-14-5260-060 164.44 Cla{m0 General Description 65643 RENT-PAPER CUTTER 01/15/04-02/14/05 PO0StatContractfInvoice# Invc Dt ' Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11974 O 64200708 12/21/04 135.10 0,00 135.10 0L Distribution G0SS Amount Work 8rderf ActCd Description 131-14'5760'060 135.10 1 0 ^8NNUAL-FY2004/05^ PAPER CUTTER LEASE-TO-OWN PAYMENTS, ACCOUNT 1i060027-87089 P0 Liquidation Amount 131'14-5760-060 135.1* --'--'-''—'--------'------'-----------'---'-------''---'-----'—'------------'''------------'--'--- V8nd0 Vendor Name R8mit8 Payee Bank Ck8CkU Chk Date Check Amount Sep 477 INDEPENDENT CITIES ASSOCIATION C/0 AP 148710 01/27/05 000.00 Claixf General Description P80 3bd Cmntrad# lmmioV# lnvC 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount A 01/27/05 000.00 0.00 000,00 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0^der0 AxtCd Description 100'01-5330-102 450.00 RICA00 PACHECO 02/0-0/05 100'01'5330 450.00 SID M0USkVI 02/18'20/05 _____________________________________________________________________ CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) 1,1 Ly m, nuIowm rur^ rm vn. Lmo oo; ^*uIII ,d9v u Payment Hiotory, Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9099 0eok/A0#'o 149027 to 143900 Payment Typo Check ________________________________________________________________________ Y8Dd0 Vendor NoNo Hamit8 Payee Bank Chook0 Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7343 INITIAL TROPICAL PLANTS AP 148711 01/27/05 40.50 cla|m# General Description 65546 PLANT MAlUT PO#Jtat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11722 8 0N089LA15J3106 01/01/05 441,00 0.00 441.00 005989LA157307 01/01/05 0.50 0.00 0.50 005089LA157388 01/01/05 25.00 0.00 25.00 SL Distribution 6nmo Amount Work Order# A(tCd Description 100-57-5000 492.50 1 E6 *hNNUAL RONN/05^ MAINTENANCE OF INTERIOR PLANT PO Liquidation Amount 100'57-5000 402.50 _'__—__--__'_-_--___—'_-_'_-_—_-----____-_-_'_'____--____-_-_—_'_—_'_—__________ VoOd0 Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk 06be Check Amount Sep 500 INTERSTATE BATTERIES NP 148712 01/27/05 301.18 CluimU General Description 65645 BATTERIES PO# 3tat Cuo ract0 lnvo|Co# Invc 0t Gross Amount 0oCm0t Amt 0ioom0t Used Net Amount 11643 O 20047039 12/20/04 361.18 0.00 301.18 Si Distribution 8moS Amount Work Urdm^0 kotCd Description 130'58-5210 361.18 1 B\ ^ANN0N--H2004/05* REPLACEMENT BATTERIES 00 POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY MAINTENANCE VEHICLES muqU/O^/On Amouu 1130+58'52110 301.18 ' _________________________________________________________________________________ Vond0 Vendor Name Re0it& Payee DoDk CheoN| Chk Date Check Amount Sep 2917 INTERSTATE FILTER SERVICE INC, AP 148713 01/27/05 149.60 C%8im0 General Description 65647 OVERPAYMENT-ANNUAL IND WASTE FEE PO#Stat Contract# Invoicef Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/76105 149.60 0.00 149.60 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work Drder0 ActCd Description 100'00-4719 149.50 OVERPAY-ANNUAL IH0 WASTE B[ ___________________________________________________________________ V8n60 Vendor Name R80itf Payee 06Dk Chook8 Chk Date Check Amount Sep 502 INTOXIMETER AP 148714 01/27/05 70.25 Claio# General 0mmri[tiuO 65605 ALCO SENSOR POI Stat Cootrmt# Invoicef lnvC Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Not Amount 12148 C 156682 11/23/04 726,25 0.00 720.25 GL Distribution @maS Amount Work 0rd6r# 8otCd Description 139'25-5745'090 726.0 i EA ALC0 SENSOR D/ GREEN DOT PAS I8TOyIMBER P0 Liquidation Amount 139-25-5745'090 725.55 -------''-'-'----------'-----''-------'-------'--'-'--------------'----'—'---'---'---'----'—'--- CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) ^.^/ V ""^"=. .~. .~ ... ^,.' ,Qju ^" Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 fheck/ACHI's 148627 to 140905 Payment Type Check ________________________________________________________________________ V8nd0 Vendor Name Rem\t# Payee Bank Cheoki Qkk Date Check Amount Sep 2386 lkMA Q0OA AP 14015 01/27/05 500.00 Claiml General Description 66640 CHINESE NEW YR SUPPLIES PO0 Sbt CUDtrmt& Immice# Inm 0t Gross Amount 0ioommt Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/26/05 300,00 0,00 300.00 SL Distribution Smoa Amount Work Drder# AotCd Description 100'73'5210 300.00 CHINESE NEW YR SUPPLIES ______________________________________________________________________ Vond0 Vendor Name R8m|t# Payee Bank Ch8ok0 Ckk Date Check Amount Sep 7307 IRON MOUNTAIN AP 148716 01/27/05 7534 Cl3in# General Description 65040 SERVICE FEE P00 Stat CnAtraC # I00ixm# Invc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount AM70142 12131/04 75.94 0.00 75.94 SL Distribution WnSS Amount Work 0rdo f kCt0 Description 100-03-5000 75.94 8RV FEE _-__'___-_--___-___-__-________________-__-____--___________-_____--_- Vond0 Vendor Name R8mit# Payee Bank CheCki 0k Date Check Amount 38y 657 J H MITCHELL & SONS Np 148717 01/27/05 52,50 Cla1mf General Description 65652 SHELL TURBO 0L POfStat ContractfInvoicef Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11644 V 108046 12/27/04 0.50 0.00 52.50 GL Distribution &0oS Amount Work Drd8r# ACCCd Description 130'58-5210 52.50 i EA ^ANN0AL'FY2004/05* ENGINE OD- AND LUBRICANTS PO Liquidation Amount 130-58-5210 52.50 ___________________________________________________________________ Vond# Vendor Name R8mitf Payee Bank 08Ck0 Ckk Date 0ook Amount Sep 2544 JC'S PLUMBING & DACKFLUN SYC AP 148710 01/27/05 963.30 Claim0 General Description 65650 PLUMBING 0N PO# Std Contract# Imm1Co# 1243 C 5453 5454 5457 5461 5462 S/05 5467 Q' Distribution 100-57'5000 127-57-5000 PO Liquidation CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 I0m [t Gross Amount Discount Amt 0ioommt Used Net Amount 12/31/04 76.22 0.00 76.22 12/31/04 67.84 0.00 67.84 12/51/04 96.00 0.00 96.00 01/05/05 0.00 0.00 63,00 01/05/05 96.00 0.00 96,00 01/11/05 501,24 0.00 501.24 01/11/05 63.00 0.00 63.00 Gross Amount Work Ordo 8 &CtCd Description 960,86 1 [& ^ANNUAL R2004/05^ PLUMBING SERVICE & PARTS' GENERAL FUND PORTION 2.45 1 EA PARKS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PORTION Amount By SANDRA A (SANDRA) .__ ._. _,__ Payment History. Dank AP Payment Dates 00 /00 10000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #'s 148627 to 148909 Payment Type Check 100 -57 -5000 950.85 127- 57-5000 3.64 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - -- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Dank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 2063 JD AUDIO VISUAL AP 148119 01127/05 312.09 Claim# General Description 65651 REPAIR SPEAKER /MIC PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Ot Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12291 C 81996 12/21/04 312.09 0.00 312.09 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -72 -5210 201.27 1 EA REPAIR 15" WOOFER ON SPEAKER 100-72 -5210 110.82 1 EA ARCHOR MIC WITH CORD PO Liquidation Amount 100 -72 -5210 327.46 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Dank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 2896 JOHN SINCLAIR VINYL LETTERS & GRAP AP 148720 01127/05 97.42 Claim# General Description 65653 LETTERING PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 11833 0 117 GL Distribution 130 -58 -5210 PO Liquidation 130 -58 -5210 Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12/08/04 97.42 0.00 97.42 Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 97.42 1 EA $ANNUAL- FY2004/05* VINYL LETTERS AND GRAPHICS Amount 97.42 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee 3215 JOHNNY PATINO Claim€ General Description 65654 REIMS MONTHLY EXPENSES Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 148721 01/27/05 33.00 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/26/05 33.00 0.00 33.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 106 -25 -5340 33.00 REIMB EXP Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7645 JOSE LUIS FERNANDEZ AP 148722 01/27/05 35.00 Claim# General Description 65655 REFUND - BASKETBALL PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt 0 01/26/05 35.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 150 -00 -2154 35.00 REFUND ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- Discount Used Net Amount 0.00 35.00 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 NIAPR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) t, i Ly ur vd uwttt rctt r rt:u vu, cuva va: l'tctut rdjtl M Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00 /0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #'s 148627 to 148909 Payment Type Check ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7646 JULIO & JOSEPHINE MELENDEZ AP 148723 01/27/05 36.00 Claim# General Description 65656 REFUND -SR TRIP (TIJUANA) POI Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/26/05 36.00 0.00 36.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 150 -00 -2169 36.00 REFUND ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7317 JRA URBAN CONSULTANTS INC. AP 148724 01127/05 25,977.50 Claim# General Description 65657 CONSULTING SRV 1/10105- 01122/05 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 12068 0 BP -17 GL Distribution 120 -41- 5000 -030 101 - 41-5000 -020 101- 41-5000 -022 101 -41- 5000 -023 101-41-5000 -024 101 -41 -5000 -025 109 -41 -5000 102 -42 -5000 -014 PO Liquidation 101 -41- 5000 -020 101 -41- 5000 -022 101 -41- 5000 -023 101 -41- 5000 -024 101 -41- 5000 -025 102 -42- 5000 -014 109 -41 -5000 120 -41 -5000 -030 Vend# Vendor Name 520 K & V BLUEPRINT SER. Claim# General Description 65660 REPRODUCTION SRV Invc Ot Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 01/10/05 25,977.50 0.00 25,977.50 Grass Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 6,494.30 1 EA 'ANNUAL- FY2004/054 CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & HOUSING DEPARTMENT, CDBG PORTION (25 %) 2,597.75 1 EA SAN GABRIEL RIVER PORTION (10 %) 2,597.75 1 EA PUENTE - MERCED PORTION (10%) 2,597.75 1 EA CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT PORTION (109) 2,597.75 1 EA DELTA PORTION (10 %) 2,597.75 1 EA SIERRA VISTA PORTION (10%) 1,298.88 1 EA AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PORTION 0) 5,195.49 1 -EA- HOUSING PORTION (20 %) Amount 2,597.75 2,597.75 2,597.75 2,597.75 2,597.75 5,195.49 11290.88 6,494.38 Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 1 KV BLUEPRINT, INC. AP 148725 01/27/05 266.12 POI Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11099 0 1032 01/10/055 80.64 0.00 00.64 GL Distribution Gross Amount Rork Order# ActCd Description 100 -52 -5210 80.64 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2004 /054 REPRODUCTION AND PRINTS, ROLLS OF PAPER, AND MAINTENANCE OF XEROX MACHINE PO Liquidation Amount 100 - 52-5210 80.64 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) uw m m"^"°." ,"." ."° ,°, ^°~ =,^,"= ,azi= ^. Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 08/00/0000 to 90/99U9999 Omok/ACHI'o 14807 to 148009 Payment Typo Check Claiml General Description 65661 PRINTING SRV PO0StatContracNImm|cef InmDt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount P3109961 01/17/05 64.73 0.00 64.73 PS10019 01/10/05 120.75 0.00 120,75 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order0AotCd Description ` 1072 118'53'500'632 185.48 PRINTING SRV 1<6.55 SL Distribution ________________________________________________________________________ Vond# Vendor Name Rem|tf Payee Work Order# AotCd bank Ch8ckf Chk Date Check Amount Sep 4075 KATHRYN Y TIZCAREN0 516.78 AP 148726 01/27/05 74.47 Claim0 General Description 65662 REIMB TRAVEL EXPENSES P00 &tot Cmntr8ctf 7OvO|Co# IoVo [t Srmm Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount V 01/26/05 74.47 8.00 74.47 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rderf A:t0 Description 100-03'5330 74.47 REIM8 TRAVEL ____________________________________________________________________ Vond# Vendor Name Romit# Payee D6Dk CheCkf Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7555 K0M TRANSCRIBING KIM MOWRY AP 14027 01/27/05 132.00 Qaiml General Description 65658 TRANSCRIBING SRV NNStat Contract0 Dnvoice# Invc Ot Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 03 01/17/05 132,00 0.00 132.00 SL Distribution &noS Amount Work Ordo # kotCd Description 100'25-5000 132.00 J R[YES ____'_'____—___________'__________-____—_—________-______—__—_'_____— V8Ddf Vendor Name Rem1t# Payee 88Dk CkoCk0 Chk Date Check Amount Sep 4503 KELLY EQUIPMENT AP 14028 01/27/05 516.78 CbNN General Description 05663MISCPARTS/SERV PO0Stat Contract0Invoicef ImmOt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11545 O 14188 12/03/04 531,81 0.00 351.01 ' 14318 12128/04 18.0 0.00 18.0 1072 01/06/05 146.35 0.00 1<6.55 SL Distribution Smuo Amount Work Order# AotCd Description 130'58-5270 516.78 1 EA ^AWNUk -FY2004/VS* FACTORY SERVICE MAINTENANCE AND REPLACEMENT PARTS FOR SCHNARZE k400 STREET SWEEPER P0 Liquidation Amount 130'58'5270 --'_-'__-_-_'_'-_-__-_-_--'-_-__--_--_-__-_-_--_'__-_'_'_'__--_-_-_-_'_''__'___-''--' 516.78 CCS.6P Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) 4,Ly UT DdIOW III I'd[ A M U0, LUUD U1i,a#dIn I'dy$ 3L Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 60/00/0040 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #`s 148627 to 148909 Payment Type Check -- - ----- - -- - ------ ------ --- --- --- ------ ------------ --- --- --- ------ --- --- ------ - -- --- ------ --- ------ --- --- --- --- - - - - -- --- --- --- ---- -- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 6521 KIMBERLY A PALMER AP 148729 01/27/05 231.00 Claim# General Description 65664 TRANSCRIPT SRV POI Stat Contract# Invoice# invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount BP 65-61 41/63165 231.44 6.60 231.60 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -25 -5000 231.00 TRANSCRIPT SRV ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 4669 KING BOLT COMPANY AP 148730 01/27/05 319.28 Claimil General Description 65665 MSC SUPPLIES POl Stat Contractl Invoicel 41443 GL Distribution 100 -57 -5210 Claiml General Description 65666 NISC SUPPLIES Invc Ot Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12/27/04 215.21 0.40 215.21 Gross Amount Work Order# ActGd Description 215.21 SUPPLIES POl Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11726 C 41443 12/27/04 104.07 0.00 104.07 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -57 -5210 104.07 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2004 /05« MISCELLANEOUS "SUPPLIES PO Liquidation Amount 100 -57 -5216 104.07 Vend# Vendor Name Remitl Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 4022 KEVIN SALES DBA. KJ SERVICES ENVIR AP 148731 01/27/05 476.00 Claim# General Description 65659 PROFESSIONAL SRV USED OIL BLOCK GRANT POI Stat Contractl Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11764 0 5816 01/05/05 470.00 0.00 470.60 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 107-52 - 5006-447 474.66 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004/05$ PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR USED OIL BLOCK GRANT PO Liquidation Amount 107-52 - 5000 -047 470.00 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) tatty of Ddiawin rare reu uu> tuo uu:34am gage ss Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99199/9999 Check /ACH #'s 148627 to 148909 Payment Type Check ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 533 KLEEN KRAFT UNIFORM SUPPLY AP 148732 01127/05 754.20 Claim# General Description 65667 UNIFORM RENTAL -DEC PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 11759 0 228685 229811 231112 232044 228684 229810 231111 232043 228683 229808 231109 232041 GL Distribution 100 -57 -5210 100 -64 -5210 114 -59 -5210 -094 114 - 61-5210 -094 117 -69- 5210-052 121 -65 -5210 121 - 66-5210 121- 67-5210 121- 68 -52io 129 -54- 5210 -049 129-63- 5210 -873 130 -58 -5210 PO Liquidation 100 -57 -5210 100 -64 -5210 114 -59- 5210-094 114 -61- 5210-094 117 - 69-5210 -052 121-65 -5210 121 -66 -5210 121 -67 -5210 121- 68-5210 129 -54 -5210 -049 129 -63- 5210 -873 130- 58-5210 Invc Dt 12/07/04 12/14104 12/21/04 12/28/04 12/07/04 12/14/04 12/21/04 12/28/04 12/07/04 12/14/04 12/21/04 12/28/04 Gross Amount 109.12 79.43 67.98 49.02 41.50 56.53 18.96 49.02 116.63 22.90 75.13 67.98 Amount 109.12 79.43 67.98 49.02 41.50 56.53 18.96 49.02 116.63 22.90 75.13 67.98 Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 76.06 0.00 76.05 66.06 0.00 66.06 71.06 0.00 71.06 71.06 0.00 71.06 92.68 0.00 92.68 56.68 0.00 56.68 56.18 0.00 56.18 68.68 0.00 68.68 48.56 0.00 48.56 40.56 0.00 48.56 50.06 0.00 50.06 48.56 0.00 48.56 Work Order# ActCd Description 1 EA 'ANNUAL- FY2004/05' RENTAL OF UNIFORMS FOR THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, MAINTENANC ADMIN PORTION 1 EA GRAB PORTION 1 EA TRAFFIC CONTROL PORTION 1 EA ASPHALT PORTION 1 £A TRANSIT FACILITY MAINT PORTION 1 EA TREES PORTION 1 EA IRRIGATION PORTION 1 EA COURT REFERRAL PORTION 1 EA LANDSCAPE PORTION 1 EA MAINT ADMIN /ENVIRONMENTAL SERV PORTION i EA STREET SWEEPING PORTION 1 £A FLEET SERV PORTION CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 NIAPR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) uly ur oamwm mm teo oo, mvo vuomm page m Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 98/98/9090 Qmok/ACH#'o 14007 to 140909 Payment Type Check ___________________________________________________________________ Vand8 Vendor Name Romit# Payee Bank Omoki Chk Dade Check Amount Sep 6328 KNIGHT C0KMNNIQK0NS Nz 14033 01127/05 8.080.00 Claixf General Description 65660 JAN SERV P80 Stat ControC 0 Inv |ce# Imc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11805 O 2005'001 01/03N5 8.000.00 0,00 0,000.00 8L Distribution 8moo Amount Work Orden# AotCd Description 106-25-5000 2.852.00 1 EA ^ANHUAL-FY2000051 INFORMATION SERVICES SUPPORT FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT, PROP 172 PUBLIC SAFETY PORTION 110-25-5000 4,043.83 1 EA TRAFFIC SAFETY PORTION 112-25'5000 1,104.17 1 [8 FEDERAL ASSET FORFEITURE PORTION PO Liquidation Amount 106-25'5000 2,852.00 110-25'5000 4.043,83 112-25'5000 1.104.17 _________________________________________ V0nd8 Vendor Name Remit0 Payee 535 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC. ClaimN General Description 65669 SMART RADAR TRAILER ___________________________________ Bank CNmk0 Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 148734 01/27/05 20'900.�8 Cloi0V General Description 65676 BUS PASS SALES-JAN POI Stad Cuntrac 8 Inv iu*0 Invc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11663 0 1050253 12/25/04 2,189.50 0.00 2.189.50 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 NIAPR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) POI Stat Cootract# I00iCe8 Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net k0OUnt 12150 C 217657 12/08/04 20,909.69 0.00 20,909.68 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work Or4erf ACtCd Description 139-25-5745'009 0,414.68 i EA SMART VMS RADAR TRAILER 139-25'5745'095 1,495.00 i EA SOLAR PANEL N/$ ADDITIONAL 6 VDC BATTERIES PO Liquidation Amount -----'-'--'------''-''----'--'--------'--------'-----''—'---------------'--------''------'—'---'—' 139-25'5745'095 0^909.88 Vond0 Vendor Name R8Nitt Payee Bank ChoCk# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 580 L.A. CO METROPOLITAN TR&NSP00ATIO AP 1*8735 01/27/05 11,454.00 CIaim& General Description 85556 0j9 PkJ3 SALES-0[C P80 St6t ControCt# IDm1ce0 Iovu 0t Gross Amount Discount 80t Discount Used Net Amount 11663 O 12040560 11/25104 3.505.00 0,00 ` 31505.00 12040559 11/25/04 2.480.50 0.00 2,489.50 SL Distribution SmSo Amount Work O[dor# AotCd Description 100-00-2056 3.596.70 1 [A 'ANNUAL-FY2004/05* BUS Pk33 SALES @ COMMUNITY CENTER & CITY HALL, 00E TO MTA PORTION 117-55-5000'054 2,397.80 1 [8 PROPOSITION "A" PORTION PO Liquidation Amount 100-00'2066 3,596.70 117'55-5000-054 2,30.80 Cloi0V General Description 65676 BUS PASS SALES-JAN POI Stad Cuntrac 8 Inv iu*0 Invc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11663 0 1050253 12/25/04 2,189.50 0.00 2.189.50 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 NIAPR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) uLy m oomwm ,*,x ,n vo. Lwo vo:^°om Fage 3x Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check/ACHf's 140627 to 148909 Payment Type Check 1050254 12/25/04 3.270,00 0.00 3,270.00 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rdmr# AdCd Description 100'00-2066 3.275,70 1 EA ^ANNUA 'FY2004/05^ BUS PASS SALES A COMMUNITY CENTER & CITY HALL, DUE TO UTA PORTION 117'55-5000-054 2.183.80 i EA PROPOSITION "&" PORTION PO Liquidation Amount 100-00-2066 3,275.70 117-55'5000'054 2.188.80 _____________________________________ V8nd# Vendor Name Rem|t0 Payee 3538 L.A. COUNTY DEPT OF ANIMAL CARE AN Oaimf General Description 85678 NOVEMBER ANIMAL 3ERY ` --------------------------------------------------------------- Bank Check0 Chk Date Check Amount Sep Ns 149730 01/27/05 8,459.01 CCJ.NP Accounts Payable Holn6x8 0.1.3 N^APR AV By SANDRA A (SANDRA) POI Stad Con rax # Invoim0 lmm Nt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net A0uUUt 11814 O 0 12/08/04 8,459.01 8.00 8,459.01 GL Distribution 603o Amount Work Order ActCd D0mriybOO 100'21-5000 8'00.01 1 EA ^6KNUAL R2N)4/0S^ PICK-UP & HOUSING PO Liquidation Amount 100-21-5000 __—'_'__'________--___-__________—__-_—_____-_____-____—____'__-___' 8,459.01 V8Od# Vendor Name Re0it0 Payee Bank Ch9d# Chk Date Check 8muuD% Sep 539 LA PUENTI AUTO ELECTRIC Nn 148737 01/27/05 285.00 CIoim0 General Description ` 65670 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS PO0 St6t CODtract& lm0ice# lnvc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11646 0 5040 10/28/04 285,00 0.00 285.00 8L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rd8r0 8:tCd Description 130-58-5270 285,00 1 [A «ANNUN.'FY2004/051 AIR CONDITIONER K ELECTRICAL REPAIRS FOR CITY VEHICLES P0 Liquidation Amount 130'50'5270 285,00 ----''-''--'_-_'--_-_-'---''_--__-_-_'_-_'_--'--'_----_-_-_-_-_'_'_-_-_-_'_-_-_-_-___-_-_--__'-'' V8nd0 Vendor Name R8m|t0 Payee Bank Ck8Ckf Chk Date Check k0VUOt Sep 3580 L6W3ON PRODUCTS AP 148738 01/27/05 91.44 Cl8im0 General Description 05671 MISC SUPPLIES PO0 Jtat Cuotmut# InvniCo0 Iovc Dt Gross Amount 0iooDuUt Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12071 0 2732704 12/15104 91.44 0.00 91.44 SL Distribution SrOSo hmuoot Work 0rd8r0 6otCd Description 130'50-5210 91.44 i [A *ANNUAL-FY2003/04" TOOLS AND SHOP SUPPLIES PO Liquidation Amount '''----''_-_-_---'_'_--'_'_-_-_-_'_-_-_-_--_'_—'_-_''--_'_-_'_-_'_-_'_-'''_-_-_'_'_-_'_-_-_'_- 130-58-5210 91.44 CCJ.NP Accounts Payable Holn6x8 0.1.3 N^APR AV By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Feb VU, 1005 MAam Page 36 Payment History. Dank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Chock/ACH0's 14807 to 140909 Payment Type Check _____--_'____-_-_-____-___-_'_-___-_-_-_-_-_-____-__'_-_--__-_-_-___-_--'--___ V8nJf Vendor Name Remitt Payee Bank Chemk0 Ckk Date Check Amount Sep 960 LEWIS ENGRAVING AP 148730 01/27/05� 49.78 Claiml General Description 65672 BADGESiDESK PLATES 03iml General Description 65074 REFUND-MAGIC MT AN 3tat Contract0 Dnvoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/26/05 15,00 0.00 15.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Orderl AotCJ Description 150-00-2172 15.00 REFUND _____________________________________________________________________ VoOJ# Vendor Name Remit0 Payee ` Bank 0oCk# Ckk &1to Check Amount Sep 1312 L0RENk JOANNE FAT8-WILSON AP 148742 01/27/05 2.076.90 CIaim8 General Description 65675 GYMNASTICS 01/04/05-02/12/05 PO# Stad Contractl Contract I0m|oe# Imc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount IZ187 O 0 01/26/05 2,076.88 8.00 2,078.90 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order0 ACtCd Description 150-00'2172 2.06.90 1 EA *AKNUAL-PQ0041105^ PROVIDE GYMNASTICS CLASSES PO Liquidation Amount 150'00-2172 2,076.90 --'--'-''-''-----'---'--''--'-'----'-'''-------'----------'-''----------'---'----'--'---'---'-'' CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3N*APR700 By SANDRA A(3kNDRA) PO# 3bt COntnmt8 Invnicef Invc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 014675 01/05/05 ' 35.72 0.00 35.72 014719 01/12105 14.0 0.00 14.07 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Orderl AdCd Description 100-25'9210 49.70 DESK PLATES _______________________________________________________________________ 0end# Vendor Name Remit0 Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 5215 LIFESISN ^ INC. AP 140740 01/27/05 775.00 Qaim#Seneral Description ' 65673 lNTERPRETE SRV 12/12/04-12/30104 PO0 Stot Cmntrat# Imw1cel Inm 0t Srma Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Not Amount 182126 12/13/04 112,50 0,00 112.50 182137 12/14/04 112.50 0.00 112.50 182140 12/16/04 100.00 8.00 100.00 182138 12/17/04 112.50 0.00 112,50 182130 12/20N4 112.50 0.00 112.50 04085 12/29/04 112.50 0.00 112.50 184096 12/30/04 112.50 0.00 112.50 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Or4erf ActCd Description 100-72-5000 775.00 INTERPRETER 5RY _-___'_--_-__-_'____'_'_'--_----___-____-___'_-_--__'___-_--___'----_-____'___-____ VoDd# Vendor Name ReQit0 Payee ' Bank Check Ohk Date 08ok Amount Sop ` 7647 LIMD8EY GAGNON AP 148741 01/27105 15.00 03iml General Description 65074 REFUND-MAGIC MT AN 3tat Contract0 Dnvoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/26/05 15,00 0.00 15.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Orderl AotCJ Description 150-00-2172 15.00 REFUND _____________________________________________________________________ VoOJ# Vendor Name Remit0 Payee ` Bank 0oCk# Ckk &1to Check Amount Sep 1312 L0RENk JOANNE FAT8-WILSON AP 148742 01/27/05 2.076.90 CIaim8 General Description 65675 GYMNASTICS 01/04/05-02/12/05 PO# Stad Contractl Contract I0m|oe# Imc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount IZ187 O 0 01/26/05 2,076.88 8.00 2,078.90 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order0 ACtCd Description 150-00'2172 2.06.90 1 EA *AKNUAL-PQ0041105^ PROVIDE GYMNASTICS CLASSES PO Liquidation Amount 150'00-2172 2,076.90 --'--'-''-''-----'---'--''--'-'----'-'''-------'----------'-''----------'---'----'--'---'---'-'' CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3N*APR700 By SANDRA A(3kNDRA) uiLy ur aasmu rata rco uo, cuwa vu.,;watn raja �i Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00 /00 /0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #'s 148627 to 148909 Payment Type Check ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 984 LOS ANGELES COUNTY RECORDER AP 148743 01/27/05 13.00 Claim# General Description 65764 RECORD - WITHDRAWAL OF ORDER OF ABATEMENT 1313 BIG DALTON AV BLALWIN PARK 101- 0006785 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/27105 13.00 0.00 13.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100-00 -4591 13.00 1313 BIG DALTON ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I-------- Vend# Vendor Naas Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 984 LOS ANGELES COUNTY RECORDER AP 148744 01/27/05 13.00 Y Claim# General Description 65763 RECORD LEASE OF LIEN 4621 BALDWIN PARK BLVD 02- 1629536 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/27/05 13.00 0.00 13.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -00 -4591 13.00 4621 BP BLVD Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7648 LUCINA GALICIA AP 148745 01/27/05 15.00 Claim# General Description 65675 REFUND-FOLKLORICO PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 _ __ 01126/05 15.00 0.00 15.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 150 -00 -2172 15.00 REFUND Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7651 MARIA CASTILLO AP 148746 01/27/05 9.00 Claim# General Description 65682 REFUND- FOLKLORICO PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/26/05 9.00 0.00 9.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 150 -00 -2172 9.00 REFUND Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7652 MARIA HERNANDEZ AP 148747 01/27/05 79.75 Claim# General Description 65683 REFUND BUS LIC PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/26/05 79.75 0.00 79.75 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -00 -4030 57.25 REFUND BUS LIC CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N¢APR70 -0 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) uTty of baiawIn NarK tea ub, IM UU;Aam Vage. H Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00 /00 /0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACN #`s 146627 to 148909 Payment Type Check 103 -00 -4530 22.50 REFUND BUS LIC ----------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7649 MARIA MARTINEZ AP 148748 01/27/05 1,300 >00 Claim# General Description 65680 REFUND CID PROD PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/25/05 11300.00 0.00 1,300.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 129 -00 -2075 1,300.00 REFUND CID PRG ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7650 MARIA MENDOZA AP 148749 01/27/05 15.00 Claim4 General Description 65681 REFUND -MAGIC MT PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/26/05 15.00 0.00 15.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 150 -00 -2172 15.00 REFUND Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 2765 MARLEN GARCIA AP 148750 01/27105 186.69 Claim# General Description 65684 REIMB -DSL LINE JULY -NOV '04 POI Stat Contract# Invoice4 Invc Dt 0 01/26/05 GL Distribution Gross Amount 100 -02 -5210 186.69 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee 5898 MAXIMUS INC. Claim# General Description 65685 PREPARATION 03104 ST CONTROLLER'S I RDA REPORTS Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 186.69 0.00 186.69 Work Order# ActCd Description REIMB -DSL JLY -NOV '04 Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 148751 01/27/05 6,500.00 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 1025979 -001 12131/04 6,500.00 0.00 61500.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100-81 -5000 6,500.00 03/04 ST CONTROLLERS /RDA REPORTS CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N'APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) Ully Ot Galttk H warts reo uu, MD uu:a4am wdge 5J Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #'s 148627 to 148909 Payment Type Check ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 908 MELISSA STEHLY AP 148752 01/27 /05 84.00 Claim# General Description 65686 PER DIEM 02/24/05 - 02/25105 Claim# General Description 65609 MISC SRV PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 5301 GL Distribution 100 -57- 5000 -211 Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12131/04 39.77 0.00 39.77 Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 39.77 MISC SRV --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) P0# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/26/05 84.00 0.00 84.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 106- 25-5340 84.00 PER DIEM 2/24- 25/05 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7399 MID- CITIES HONDA/ KAWASAKI /SEA -DOD AP 148753 01/27/05 29.43 Claim# General Description 65687 ! DISC FARTS /SRV P0# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11835 0 2004004668 11/29/04 29.43 0.40 29.43 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 130 -58 -5270 29.43 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2004 /05# POLICE DEPARTMENT MOTORCYCLE PARTS & REPAIRS PO Liquidation Amount 130 -58 -5270 29.43 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 634 MILLER'S & ISHAMS FIRE EXTINGUISHE AP 148754 01/27/05 130.05 Claim# General Description 65688 EXTINGUISHER SRV PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12055 0 5337 12/02104 90.28 0.00 90.20 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 130-58- 5210 90.29 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004/05' SERVICE FOR VEHICLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS PO Liquidation Amount 130- 58-5210 90.28 Claim# General Description 65609 MISC SRV PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 5301 GL Distribution 100 -57- 5000 -211 Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12131/04 39.77 0.00 39.77 Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 39.77 MISC SRV --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) t Jjy Ot DdIOW111 Ydf'K M VD, IM UU;34ff Fd1 e 4U Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00 /0000 to 99/99/9999 Check/ACH #'s 140627 to 148909 Payment Type Check ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 2592 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES INC. AP 148755 01/27/05 1,000.00 Claim# General Description 55691 ENG SERV POI Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount used Net Amount 12204 C 2 01/05/04 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 12/29/04 118 -53- 5020 -882 1,000.00 1 EA PREPARE TIME CHART AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR 5384 12/29104 THE TURN ON TRAFFIC SIGNAL N RAMONA & EARL, CIP 882 PO Liquidation Amount 01/04/05 263.00 118- 53-5020 -882 11000.00 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7653 MISSION VALLEY HILTO AP 148756 01/27/05 205.09 Claim# General Description 65692 LODGING - MELISSA STEHLY 02/24/05 - 02125/05 POI Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/26/05 285.09 0.00 285.09 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 106 -25 -5340 285.09 M STEHLY 2/24 -25/05 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 4280 mITY -LITE, INC. AP 148757 01/27/05 962.38 Claim# General Description 65690 LECTERN MICROPHONE POI Stat Contract# Invoice# 12197 C 427750 GL Distribution 100 -72 -5210 100 -73 -5210 100- 76-5210 PO Liquidation 100- 72-5210 100 - 73-5210 100-76 -5210 Vend# Vendor Name 649 MONTY'S ELECTRIC Claim# General Description 65693 ELECTRICAL SRV Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Not Amount 12/21/04 962.38 0.00 962.30 Gross Amount Work Orden ActCd Description 240.60 1 EA REPLACEMENT PODIUM NICS, RECREATION SERVICES PORTION 240.60 1 EA SENIOR SERVICES PORTION 481.18 1 EA TEEN CENTER PORTION Amount 240.00 240.00 480.00 ------.----------.----------......------------------- ....------------ -- - - -'-- -- -- - - ---- Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 148758 01/27/05 1,059.00 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12083 0 5380 12/29/04 328.00 0.00 328.00 5383 12/29/04 338.00 0.00 336.00 5384 12/29104 130.00 0.00 130.00 5385 01/04/05 263.00 0.00 263.00 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of oaiawin varK reo ua, zuva UU:Aam Gage 41 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00 /00 /0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #'s 148627 to 148909 Payment Type Check GL Distribution 131 -14 -5430 -064 Claim# General Description 65700 SRV 12/12/04 - 01/11/05 A/C #510397312 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 518397312 -038 GL Distribution 100 -25 -5430 Claim# General Description 65701 SRV 12103/04-01102/05 Gros: Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 58.80 CELL PH USE Invc Ot Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 01/16/05 1,136.29 0.00 1,136.29 Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 1,136,29 12/12/04 °01/11/05 POI Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 788726221-019 01/07/05 96.52 0.00 96.52 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 102-42- 5430 -014 48.26 12/03/04- 01/02/05 120 -43 -5430 -030 48.26 12/03/04-01/02/05 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100- 57-5000 666.00 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004/054 ELECTRICAL SERVICE # PARTS, GENERAL FUND PORTION 127 -57 -5000 393.00 1 EA PARKS MAINTENANCE PORTION PO Liquidation Amount 100 - 57-5000 666.00 127 -57 -5000 393.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Nam Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7654 NANCY GAGNON AP 148759 01/27/05 45.00 Claim# General Description 65694 REFUND -MAGIC HT PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/26105 45.00 0.00 45.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 150 -00 -2172 45.00 REFUND Vend# Vendor Name Remit( Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 5286 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS AP 148760 01/27/05 1,291.61 Claim# General Description 65699 CELL PH SRV A/0932287317 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 932287317 -037 01/08/06 58,80 0.00 58.80 GL Distribution 131 -14 -5430 -064 Claim# General Description 65700 SRV 12/12/04 - 01/11/05 A/C #510397312 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 518397312 -038 GL Distribution 100 -25 -5430 Claim# General Description 65701 SRV 12103/04-01102/05 Gros: Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 58.80 CELL PH USE Invc Ot Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 01/16/05 1,136.29 0.00 1,136.29 Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 1,136,29 12/12/04 °01/11/05 POI Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 788726221-019 01/07/05 96.52 0.00 96.52 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 102-42- 5430 -014 48.26 12/03/04- 01/02/05 120 -43 -5430 -030 48.26 12/03/04-01/02/05 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) Qlym DaIdWmmrx �eo uu, zuuo uu:.54aa ege 41 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check/ACHf's 140627 to 140909 Payment Type Check _ --- 0md# --- --- ------ Vendor --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Kamm Remit# Payee --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Bank --- --- --- Omok# ------ --- Chk Date --- --- ___ Check Amount --- --- Sep 5286 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS AP 148761 01/27/05 45,28 Y ClaimO General Description ' 6502 SRY 1210IN4r011/02/05 PO# Stat Cmntr8o # Immicef Invc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 421873621'006 01/07/05 49.28 0.00 49.28 SL Distribution Smon Amount Work 0rder# AdCd Description 150-00-2169 43.28 12/03/04'01/02/05 ___________________-_______-__________________-_-__'____--_-_-___-_' VoOd# Vendor Name Romitf Payee Bank Qmnk0 Ckk 03t8 Check Amount Soy 6412 &lCH0LE H[NURICKS AP 14870 01/27105 103.15 Cb1ml General Description 65655 REIMB EXPENSE ClaiVN General Description 65897 MISC SUPPLIES PO# Stat Cun [8C # Imm|m# POI Stat Contrat0 Immjm0 Invc Ut Gross Amount Discount Amt UisOnUDt Used Net Amount 394334 01/07/05 V 01/00/05 103.16 01/10/05 0.00 103.16 39470 SL Distribution 6.05 Gross Amount Work Ordm^ ActCd Description 34.60 0.00 394767 150'00-2172 32.41 103,16 SL Distribution RElM8 EXP Work OrJer0ActWDescription ___________________________________________________________________ Vand0 Vendor Name Rem|tf Payee Bank Qmckf Chk Date Check Amount Sep 683 NICH0L3 UMBER & HARDWARE ' AP 148703 01127/85 773.30 ClaiNl General Description 05696 Ml3C SUPPLIES PO# Stat Cootractf lnvuim0 IUvc Dt G0nS Amount Discount Amt UinoUont Used Net Amount 11733 O 392394 12/27/04 121,73 0.00 121,73 ' '1y2395 12/27/04 22,54 0.00 22.94 39052 12/29/04 65.58 0.00 65.50 593043 12/30/04 116.60 0.00 116.60 303337 01/03/05 78.98 0.00 78.98 393507 01/04/05 28.10 0.00 0.10 393033 01/05/05 58.76 0.00 58,76 Si Distribution 80ms Amount Work 0rdor8 ACtCd Description 100-57-5000 0.00 i EA ^kNN0N'-FY2004/054 FACILITY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES, GENERAL FUND PORTION 127-57-5000 492.67 i EA PARKS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PORTION PO Liquidation Amount 127-57-5000 492,67 ClaiVN General Description 65897 MISC SUPPLIES PO# Stat Cun [8C # Imm|m# Invc [t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used 11734 D 393033 01/05/05 0.71 0.00 394334 01/07/05 70.27 0.00 39076 01/10/05 90,28 0.00 39470 01/11/05 6.05 0.00 304705 01/11/05 34.60 0.00 394767 01/11/05 32.41 0.00 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work OrJer0ActWDescription CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 Net Amount 0.71 70,27 99.28 6.05 34.60 32.41 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) m^' ". """='" '"'" ."° .", =.~ ""`^=w ,a�r .~ Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check/ACHi's 148527 to 148909 Payment Type Check 1O0-57-5210'211 243,32 1 0 ^AWNUk 'R2004/V5^ FACILITY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES AT TEEN CENTER FACILITY PO Liquidation Amount 100-57'5210-211 243,32 CIoim8 General Description 65698 SUPPLIES P0# Stad Contr8o f Invn|ceO Invc [t Snmo Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 390174 12/23/04 22.72 0.00 22.72 0- Distribution Smau Amount Work Orden# ACtCd Description 100'27-5210 22.72 SUPPLIES CIa|0# General Description 65705 UISC SUPPLIES OaN# General Description 65558 CANVAS TARP POf Stad CoUtrao # Iovoicef Invc 0t Gross Amount Uinommt Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11117703 01/02/05 675.74 0.00 673.74 SL Distribution SrOSn Amount Work 8yderV AdCd Description 127-57-5210 673.74 CANVAS TARP _—'___—_______-_—______—__—_—____________—_______--_—_______—__' CGS.APACmunts Payable Release 6.1.3N^APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) POI Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Ot Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 1037 0 389989 12/16/04 8.09 0.00 8.00 384128 01/06/05 6.50 0,00 0.50 SL Distribution Gmoo Amount Work 0rder# ACtCd Description 130-58'5210 14.59 1 EA °ANN0Al-R2004/05^ MATERIALS & SMALL TOOLS PO Liquidation Amount 130'58'5210 14.50 --'_'-''-'''_'_'-'_''_'_-'---'_-_______'_'--_'_'-'--_-__-_----_-_-_-_'_'_-_'--_-_-_-_--__-_'-'' V8Dd0 Vendor Name R8mitt Payee Bank ChoCk# Ckk 0a%8 Check Amount Soy 686 NORM & BOBS TIRES AP 140765^ 01/27/05 50.00 CIaim# Smnoml Description 65704 TIRE SRY ' PO# Stat (oAtrm±X Immiuo# lovc 0t GmSo Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Met Amount 11650 0 43810 12/00/04 20,00 0.00 20,00 43942 12/26/04 38.00 0.00 36.00 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work O[d8r# k(tCd 0mooriytinD 130'58-5270 58.00 i EA ^ANKUAL-FY2004/05^ TRUCK TIRE REPAIR & ALIGNMENT PO Liquidation Amount ___________________________________________________________________ 130-58'5270 56.00 Kond# 0oOdNr Name Remit8 Payee Bank Ckuxk0 Chk Date 0mCk Amount Sep 4078 NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT CO. 1 HJ0C BUSINESS SOLUTIONS AP 140766 01/27/05 673.74 OaN# General Description 65558 CANVAS TARP POf Stad CoUtrao # Iovoicef Invc 0t Gross Amount Uinommt Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11117703 01/02/05 675.74 0.00 673.74 SL Distribution SrOSn Amount Work 8yderV AdCd Description 127-57-5210 673.74 CANVAS TARP _—'___—_______-_—______—__—_—____________—_______--_—_______—__' CGS.APACmunts Payable Release 6.1.3N^APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) uIy ct Du/ will rdf-x nm oo. Zovo vo;»4dffl Fdge qo Payment History. Bank A0 Payment Bates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Chmok/ACH0'a 148627 to 140909 Payment Type Check __________________________________________________________________________ Vondf Vendor Hamm Remi0 Payee Bank CheC # Ckk Date Check Amount Sep 407 OFFICE DEPOT, INC. AP 148767 01/27105 354.02 Claiml General Description 65706 SUPPLIES POI 8tad Cu8traC # InvnioV# 12276 C 266137050-001 266657292'001 266557075-001 SL Distribution N0-22-5N)9 100-21-5210 100-23-5210 Imc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11/29/04 324,/5 0.00 324.75 12/06/04 12.50 0.00 12.50 12/06/04 16.77 0.00 10.77 Gross Amount Work OrdenO A:tCd Description 524.75 1 EA INVOICE #266137050-001 OFFICE CHAIR 16.77 1 [A INVOICE #268657075'001 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLlES 12.50 i EA INVOICE #266557292-001 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES PO Liquidation Amount 100'21'5Z10 16.77 100-22-5409 324.75 100-23'5ZN 12,50 ________________________________________________________________________________ VondV Vendor Name Remit0 Payee Bank 0oCk0 Chk Date Omok Amount Sep 136 OFFICEMAX- BOISE CO **VOID** AP 148769 01/27/05 342.09 Cl3)m# General Description 65527 SUPPLIES PON Stat {ontrai0 Immicel lmm 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11603 O 1006 11/04/04 111.87 0,00 111.87 653457 12/06/04 63,57 0,00 0.57 153517 12/08/04 -49.40 0.00 +0.48 824145 12/14/04 51,60 0.00 51.60 0i Distribution S0mS Amount Work 0rder0 ACtCd Description 121-60-5210 177.58 1 EA ^&NNUALFY2004/051 REPLACEMENT FAX CARTRIDGES P0 Liquidation Amount 121-68'5210 177.56 Claiml Snoora} Description 65705 SUPPLIES PO0 St3t Contmot0 Invnicn# IDVC 0t Gross 60nu0t Discount Amt 0ioonont Used Net Amount 86&454 12/31/04 5.69 0.00 5.68 8L Distribution S0xS Amount Work Ordorf kotCd Description 100-76-5210 5.69 SUPPLIES Qoim# General Description 65707 SUPPLIES POf Stat Contractf Invoicef Invc Ot Gross Amount Discount Ant Discount Used Net Amount 00444686-001 12/27/04 129.0 0.00 128.63 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rder8 AxtCd Description 100-24-6210 10.0 SUPPLIES Oa1m0 General 0emr1[tiuO CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.0) N*APR7100 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) city of Uamwm parx �eb \0' ZM VU:J4am page 4� Payment History. bank AP Payment 03toS 00/00/0000 to 99/90/0999 Omd/6N0'o 14807 t0 140900 Payment Type Check 65708 SUPPLIES P0tStat Cmntrad0 Inv ice# 035099 GL Distribution NO'23-S210 Oa|m8 SoOorol Description 65762 SUPPLI715 Invc Ut Gross Amount Discount Amt 0iSommt Used Net Amount 12/29/04 12.90 0.00 12.80 8moS Amount Work 8rdm.8 &otCd Description 12.80 SUPPLIES Pot Stat C0ntrac # Immice# I0m 0t Gnmo Amount Discount Amt Uiox0mt Used Net Amount 11777 O 821030 12/14/04 17.55 0.00 17.55 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# AotCd Description 100-02-5210 17.35 i EA ^ANNUA -FY2004/VO^ OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR ADMINISTRATION P0 Liquidation Amount 100'02'5210 17.35 ' __—___-__--_'_—_____-____--_-__'--_'___-_____'_-___--_'_,____-_---__-_'__-__'_' Wend0 Vendor Name Remit8Payee Bank Check0 Chk Date Check Amount Sep 765.5 OL[6AR0 GARCIA 8P 148769 01/27/05 15,00 Cbimf General Description 65709 REFUND-MAOIC MT PoNStat Contract# Invoicef lnvc Ot Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/26/05 15.00 0.00 15.00 GL Distribution GmeS Amount Work Drder8 ACtCd Description 150-00-2172 15.00 REFUND _-__''_'___—____—____—_--__—_______'______________—___—____—_-_-__—___ VonJV YeDdO[ Name Rem|t8 Payee 86ok CkoCk0 Ckk Date Check Amount Sop 7656 0UAR MU0ILLO #P 140770 01/27/05 15.00 Slaimf General Description 65711 REFUND-MAGIC UT N@Stat Contract#Dnvo1u# Invc Ot Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Met Amount 0 01/26/05 15.00 0.00 15.00 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work N^derl ActCd Description 150-00-2172 15.00 REFUND _____________________________________________________________________ Vondf Vendor Name Romit0 Payee Bank CheCk# Chk U8t8 08Ck Amount Sep 1446 ORANGE C0 SHERIFF'S, DEPT A0 148771 01/27/05 5,0 Clai0l General Description 65710 TUITION-BRANDON SkEN 02/23/05 PO& Stat Co8trxd& Immice# Invn 0t SAmn Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Not AN8Uot 0 01/26/05 5.0 0.00 5.20 SL Distribution 8moS Amount Work 0^der# AotCd Description 106-25-5340 5.20 BRANDON S6ENZ ----'--------------------------------------------------------------- CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) ".^y". "~~~...... .==.`."^ ... '_= ,uju 4 Payment History. bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check/ACHI's 140627 to 140909 Payment Type Check -----------------`-----`—`---^-----`—`----------`---------------------------- VoD f Vendor Name Remitf Payee Bank CheokV Chk Date Check Amount Sep 1446 ORANGE CO SHERIFF'S DEPT AP 148772 01/27/05 5.20 Y C]aiml General Description 65712 TUITION-EDDIE AVAKIAN 02/23/05 PO#StatContract0Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/26/05 5.20 0.00 5.20 SL 0iStri�utioo 8mos Amount Work OrdenV AotCd Description 106-25-5340 5.20 E0}IE 6VA&IAN __________________________________________________________________ Vand# Vendor Name Rem\tf Payee Bank ChmCkf Chk Date Omok Amount Sep 1446 ORANGE C8 SHERIFF'S DEPT AP 148773 01/27/05 89~00 Y Cla<m# General Description POI StatContractiInvoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Aint Discount Used Net Amount V 01/26105 89,00 0,00 89.00 0L 0intrihmt1mo 60ao Amount Work Orderf AotCd Description 106'25'53,40 89.00 8BURA, MERSk8U. FL0R[S -'-_-'_-'---''__-_-_-_-_'_-'_''-_-_-_-_'_-_-_'_-'_—'''-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_'_-_----_'_'_-_- VoDd0 Vendor Koxm Rnm1t0 Payee Bank Cheokf Chk Date Check Amount Sep 713 PAP8RD0ECT INC. NP 148774 01/27/05 55.91 Cla|mf General Description 65710 VALENTINES DAY DANCE INVITATIONS PO# Shat Con r@ct# lm0ice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Not Amount 3420545000017 12/30/04 06,91 ' 0.00 86.91 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ACtCd Description 100-73'5210 95.91 INVITATIONS-VALENTINES DAY DANCE ___________________________________________________________________ Vond0 Vendor Name Rn0\t0 Payee Bank Ch8ok0 Chk Date QmCk Amount Sop 86 P6TTON SALES CORP (6R80N PIPE & 3T AP 148775 01/27/05 24.17 Claimf General Description 65720 MI3C SUPPLIES PO# Jtat Coo rm±f Immim8 TDm Nt 11039 O 987640 12/05/04 GL Distribution Gross Amount 1310'58-5210 24.17 PO Liquidation Amount 130-58-5210 24,17 Cross A0nUDt 0iynmmt Amt Discount Used Net Amount 24.17 0.00 24.17 Work OrderfActGd Description 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2004/054 STEEL TO REPAIR EQUIPMENT CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of miawin FdrK re6 UU, 4M VU: )4dIII Faye of Payment History, Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99199/9999 Check /ACH #'s 148627 to 148909 Payment Type Check ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 864 PERS - RETIREMENT AP 148776 01/27/05 831.07 Glaim# General Description 65716 PERS BUY BACK PRG PP #02 PIE: 01/15/05 RAMIREZ, KOLBACH, HART & DELGADO PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/26/05 831.07 0.00 9331.07 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100- 00 -2Z05 354.26 BUY BACK 102 1/15/05 RAMIREZ 100 -00 -2205 58.00 BUY BACK #02 1/15/05 HART 100-00-2205 325.62 BUY BACK #02 1/15/05 KOLBACH 100-00-2205 92.39 BUY BACK #2 01/15/05 DELGADO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 864 PERS - RETIREMENT AP 148777 01127/05 130,498.74 Y Glaim# General Description 65717 PP #02 PIE: 01/15105 SVC PER: 01-05-4 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/26/05 130,498.74 0.00 130,498.74 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -00 -2205 48,681.57 PP #02 01/15/05 SRV 01 -05 -4 100-00 -2223 183.21 PP #02 01/15/05 SRV O1 -05-4 100- 00-2305 81,633.96 PP #02 01/15/05 SRV 01 -05 -4 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Checkfi Chk Date Check Amount Sep 728 SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, I AP 148778 01/27/05 3,358.95 Claim# General Description 65730 METROLINK STATION 12/31/04 - 01/13/05 POI Stat Contract# Invoice# 11776 0 W0405258 GL Distribution 117 -55- 5000 -053 PO Liquidation 117 - 55-5000 -053 Claim# General Description 65731 METROLINK STATION 12/17/04- 12/30/04 Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 01/14/05 1,810.95 0.00 1,810.95 Grass Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 11810.95 1 EA 'ANNUAL-FY2004 /05' METROLINK SECURITY SERVICES Amount 1,810.95 POI Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11776 0 W0308997 12/31/04 1,548.00 0.00 1,548.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 117 -55- 5000-053 1,548.00 1 EA 'ANNUAL-FY2004 /05' METROLINK SECURITY SERVICES PO Liquidation Amount 117 -55- 5000 -053 1,548.00 -- -----....--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- GCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N'APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) city OY £idiowin rdlh rev vv, Gvvu B0:J9d81 F'dge qO Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00 /00 /0000 to 09/99/9999 Check /ACH #'s 148627 to 148909 Payment Type Check ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7567 PROJECT SISTER 713042 AP 148779 01/27105 544.80 Claim# General Description Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -57 -5000 1,300.00 55719 SRV OCT -DEC 12/07/04 136.24 0.00 FACILITIES, GENERAL FUND PORTION 127 -57 -5000 POI Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Ot Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount Amount 12234 0 0 01126/05 544.80 0.00 544.80 154.18 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 62.18 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee 120 -43 -5050 -182 544.80 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004/054 INTERVENTION PROGRAM FOR 14.15 0.00 AP 148781 01127/05 545.55 VICTIMS OF RAPE OR SEXUAL ASSUALT 12/15/04 PO Liquidation Amount 110.92 2002 12/17/04 120 - 43-5050-182 544.80 6.79 GL Distribution Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 3702 RALPH VILLASENIOR PAINTING 1 EA 'ANNUAL- FY20041054 AUTO AP 148780 01/27/05 1,800.00 Claim# General Description 65721 PAINTING SRV PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12079 0 713040 01/18/05 500.00 0.00 500.00 713042 01/24/05 1,300.00 0.00 1,300.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -57 -5000 1,300.00 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004/05" MAINTENANCE PAINTING FOR CITY 12/07/04 136.24 0.00 FACILITIES, GENERAL FUND PORTION 127 -57 -5000 500.00 12/00/04 1 EA PARKS MAINTENANCE PORTION PO Liquidation Amount 1988 100 -57 -5000 1,300.00 0.00 154.18 127-57-5000 500.00 12110/04 62.18 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 732 RAMONA AUTO PARTS,IN 14.15 0.00 AP 148781 01127/05 545.55 Claims# General Description 65722 MISC AUTO PARTS PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11654 0 1974 12101/04 18.28 0.00 18.28 1977 12/02/04 20.32 0.00 20.332 1981 12/07/04 136.24 0.00 136.24 1986 12/00/04 22.59 0.00 22.59 1988 12/OB/04 154.18 0.00 154.18 1991 12110/04 62.18 0.00 62.18 1094 12/13104 14.15 0.00 14.15 1997 12/15/04 110.92 0.00 110.92 2002 12/17/04 6.79 0.00 6.79 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 130 -58 -5210 545.65 1 EA 'ANNUAL- FY20041054 AUTO PARTS AND SUPPLIES PO Liquidation Amount 130 -58 -5210 - - - -- ..---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 545.65 - - - - -- CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) city of 0a1 wm mrK wm vo, zom' owm401 Page 49 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 80/00/000* to 991199/9999 Ck9ok/A0 #'u 14807 to 140900 Payment Typo Check _—___—_____—_____—_—__-__—__—____—__________________—__—__________- VomN Vendor Name Remit0 Payee Bank 0eok# Chk Date Check Amount Sap 6460 RIVERSIDE CO FAIR G NATIONAL FE3TI WP 140782 01/27/05 164.00 Claiml General Description 65723 SR TRIP 02/24/05 P0f Stat Cmntrut# Immicef Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/26/05 164.00 0.00 164.00 SL Distribution Srunu Amount Work NrderU 8d[d Description 150-00-2160 164.00 SR TROP 2/24105 _______________________________________________________________________ Vand0 Vendor Name R8mitt Payee Bank Ckwok0 Chk Date Check Amount 3oy 5899 RO8A CABALLERO AP 148783 01/27/05 125.17 ClainW General Description 651125 REIMB MONTHLY EXPENSES P0O 3t6\ Contract# IDvnice# Invc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt 0ionm0t Used Net Amount 0 01/27/05 125.17 0,00 125`17 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Ordm08xtCd Description ' 100'81-5000 10.17 RBMO BP ` ________________________________________________________________________________ Von # Vendor Nome Rem%# Payee Bank Chemk0 Chk Date Check Amount Sep 967 &.C.A,C.E.0. AP 148794 01127/05 40.00 Claiml General Description 65728 REGIST-SUZIE AYALA GEORGE NELSON GCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) POf &tat Cootract0 Immicm0 Imc 0t Srma Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 2095 01127/05 20.00 0.00 20.00 2094 12/08/04 20,00 0,00 20.00 SL Distribution SmSo Amount Work Drderf AdCd Description 100'47'5180 /N,(N SUOIE AYAL6/S20RGE NELSON --'_----_-'--_'_-_----_----'__-_'_-_'_-_-_-_'_-_-_-_--__-_--__-_-_--__-_-_-_-_--'-_-_-_'_'_-'-- Vond0 Vendor Name HnNitf Payee 868k ChoCk8 Chk [$to Check Amount Sop 5872 SAN DERNAR0INO CO EY0C AP 148785 01127/05 175.00 Claim8 General Description 6570 TUITION-R&W0#LL MORRIS "DRIVER TRN8 UPDATE" 03/11/85 PO# Stat Contraot0 Invo1Co# lnvn Ut Gross Amount Discount &0t Discount Used Not Amount 0 01/27/05 175.00 0.00 175.00 GL Distribution 80oS Amount Work 0rdar0 ActCd Description -----'-''-'-----'-'--'----'-''-----------------'-----------'—'-------'—'-----'-''-------'-------'-'' 106-25-5340 175.00 R MORRIS 5/11/05 GCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of baldwin YarK heir UU, LUU3 UU:34am rage �u Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00 /00 /0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #`s 148627 to 140909 Payment Type Check ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Dame Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7657 SAN GABRIEL BASIN WATER QUALITY AU AP 948786 01/27/05 20.00 Claim# General Description 65724 LUNCHEON MTG 11/10/04 NARLEN GARCIA POI Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 11/12/04 20.00 0.00 20.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100-01-5330-103 20.00 N GARCIA 11/10/04 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 3224 SANTA ANITA FAMILY SERVICES AP 148787 01/27/05 420.00 Claim# General Description 65729 DEC SERVICES Claim# General Description 65727 NARLEN GARCIA LUNCHEON 1/26/05 POI Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Ot Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/27/05 25.00 0.00 25.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -01- 5330 -103 25.00 i1ARLEN GARCIA 1/26/05 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N °APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12230 0 0 01/27/05 420.00 0.00 420.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 120 -43- 5050-137 420.00 1 EA 'ANNUAL-FY2004 /05' SENIOR COUNSELING PROGRAM PO Liquidation Amount 120 -43- 5050 -137 420.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 6917 SAN GABRIEL VALLEY PAN AP 148788 01/27/05 25.00 Claim# General Description 65715 RESERV -DAVID OLIVAS 01/26/05 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/26/05 25.00 0.00 25.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -01- 5330 -101 25.00 RSERV -DAVID OLIVAS --------..--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 6917 SAN GABRIEL VALLEY PAN 1 SGV PBLIC AFFAIRS NETWORK AP 148789 01/27/05 25.00 Claim# General Description 65727 NARLEN GARCIA LUNCHEON 1/26/05 POI Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Ot Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/27/05 25.00 0.00 25.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -01- 5330 -103 25.00 i1ARLEN GARCIA 1/26/05 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N °APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) .',/ ~ ~._' . — _ _ __ Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check/ACHI's 148627 to 148909 Payment Type Check Ven 8 Vendor Name Remit0 Payee Bank Chmd0 Ckk Date 0mdk Amount Sep 767 SIERRA INSJNlAJIUNS, INC. AP 140790 01/27/05 955.00 Claiml General Description 65535 INSTALL 8 REMOVE RECYCLING BANNERS PU0 Stat Contraut0 Invo1cef lnvC 0t Gross Amount 0ioonont Amt Discount Used Not Amount 12029 C 3I-24541 12/30/04 955.00 0.00 955.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rJer# AdCd Description 120'54-5000-049 955'00 1 EA INSTALLATION, REMOVAL AND ONE YEAR STORAGE OF RECYCLING BANNERS P0 Liquidation Amount 120-54-5000'045 955.00 ------------------------------------------ VendV Vendor Name ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rn01t8 Payee Bank Ck8Ck# Ohk Date Check Amount Sep 2055 STRCHIE FINGER PRINT LABORATORIES AP 148791 01/27/05 745.54 ClaimV General Description 65714 EVIDENCE SUPPLIES PO# Stat CVotmot# lnvo1ce# Invo Ut Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Not Amount 0361142 11/22/04 745.54 0.00 745.54 8L Distribution Sr8oS Ax0UDt Work 0rdur0 &ct0 Description 100-24-5210 -'--__-_'__--_--_-'-_'____'_'-__'_'_-_-----___'-_-_'_-_-_'_----_'_-_'_-_-_'_-_'-_--'_' 745.64 EVIDENCE SUPPLIES GCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 0.1.3 M*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) 61 L or n*iOw,/ nux rvo "o, 4m vnuqdm ruUL' :k Payment History. Bank AP Payment Bates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check/ACHI's 148627 to 148909 Payment Type Check ____________________________________________________________________________ Vun 8 Vendor Name Rem t0 Payee Bank Chemk8 Qhk Date Check Amount Sep 1009 SMART & FINAL AP 148792 01/27/05 893.84 OoimA General Description 65528 SUPPLIES (VOLLEYBALL BANQUET) PO#Stad CuNbmt#Immicef 5yS42 SL Distribution 150-00-2154 Claim# General Description 65529 SUPPLIES (SANTA CLOTHES PRG) Pof Stad Contrao 0 Invoice# 11664 O 2106 99557 59624 SL Distribution 150'00'2172 P0 Liquidation 150-00'2172 Cla1ml General Description 65530 SUPPLIES (TEEN CENTER_ PO#St6t Conrmt0 Imo|ce# 1207 O 99463 1373 �ffi/ SL Distribution 100'76'5210 PO Liquidation 10V-76'SZM Claiml General Description 65531 supplies lmm 0 Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12/14/04 25.74 0.00 25.74 Gross Amount Work Ordenf AdCd Description 25.74 SUPPLIES Ixvc [t Gross Amount Discount Amt 8|oomunt Used Net Amount 12/17/04 6.69 0.00 6.69 12/13/04 79.90 0.00 7930 12/13N4 -17.50 0.00 -17.50 8mSS Amount Work Order0 8Ct0 Description 05.08 1 EA ^ANNUW--P/2004/05* SUPPLIES FOR SMACK BAR & SPECIAL EVENTS Amount 60,09 IovC 0t 0muo Amount Discount Amt 0|ommQt Used Net Amount 12/13/04 1.00 0.00 1.00 12/10/04 90.13 0.00 90.13 12/09/04 53.29 0.00 53.29 Gross Amount Work Order ActCd Description 144.42 1 EA °kNNUAL RO(N4/05* MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES FOR TEEN CENTER PROGRAMS Amount i44.0 PO# Stat Co0 rmt# IDvnice# Imc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net &0OQRt 12245 O V 12/29/04 272,26 0.00 272.26 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order0 kdCd Description 100'73-5210 272.0 i EA ^ANWUAL'R2004/05* MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES FOR SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS PO Liquidation 100-7S'52N Claim# General Description 65532 SUPPLIES Amount 272.26 PO#Stat ContractfInvo1cef lnvc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11664 D 8583 12/20/04 8.54 0.00 8.54 0590 12129104 58.58 0.00 58.58 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) 6 1 LY VT L(11UP4 III rain rtu V0, LVVU VD; j4clw mist Da Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check/AGHI's 140627 to 140909 Payment Type Check 8970 12/30/04 -27.55 0.00 -27.55 CL Distribution Gross Amount Work Orderf ActCd Description 150-00-2172 39.57 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2004,105* SUPPLIES FOR SNACK BAR & SPECIAL EVENTS PO Liquidation Amount 150-00-292 39.57 Glaiml General Description E5732 SUPPLIES Claiml General Description 65735 SUPPLIES POI Stat Contractf Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11602 0 15253 01/13105 45.71 0.00 45.71 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 150-00-2172 45.71 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2004/05* MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES FOR SWIM TEAM PROGRAMS PO Liquidation Amount 150-00-2172 45.71 Claim# General Description 65736 SUPPLIES-TEEN CENTER PO# Stat Contractl Invoice# Invc Ot Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12247 0 0 01/14/05 62.01 0.00 62.01 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11953 01/05/05 17.30 0.00 17.30 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100-74-5210 17.30 SUPPLIES Claimf General Description 65733 SUPPLIES (SR CENTER) PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Not Amount 12245 0 11739 01/05/05 29.16 0.00 29.16 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Orderf ActCd Description 100-73-5210 29.16 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2 004/0 5* MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES FOR SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS PO Liquidation Amount 100-73-5210 28,16 Claiml General Description 65734 SUPPLIES (SR CENTER) PO# Stat Contract# Invoicel Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12245 0 15470 01/14/05 159.56 0.00 159.56 16739 01/17/05 7.97 0.00 7.97 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100-73-5210 167.53 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2004/051 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES FOR SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMS PO Liquidation Amount 100-73-5210 167.53 Claiml General Description 65735 SUPPLIES POI Stat Contractf Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11602 0 15253 01/13105 45.71 0.00 45.71 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 150-00-2172 45.71 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2004/05* MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES FOR SWIM TEAM PROGRAMS PO Liquidation Amount 150-00-2172 45.71 Claim# General Description 65736 SUPPLIES-TEEN CENTER PO# Stat Contractl Invoice# Invc Ot Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12247 0 0 01/14/05 62.01 0.00 62.01 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Dainrurn rfar'K rer, Ud, 00 M-54am Nage b4 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #`s 10627 to 148909 Payment Type Check 100-76-5210 62.01 PO Liquidation Amouirt 100 -76 -5210 62.01 Claim# General Description 65757 SUPPLIES 1 EA "ANNUAL-FY2004 /05' MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES FOR TEED CENTER PROGRAMS PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Ot Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12246 0 2107 12/17/04 22.05 0.00 22.05 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -81 -5210 22.05 1 EA {ANNUAL- FY2004/05° SUPPLIES FOR CITY COUNCIL COST FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS MEETINGS, SPECIAL MEETINGS AND EVENTS PO Liquidation Amount 0.00 1 EA ENERGY COST FOR METROLINK 100 - 81-5210 22.05 LOTS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 4651 SMS SYSTEMS MAINTENANCE SERVICES, 121-56 -5433 AP 140794* 01/27/05 598.00 Claim# General Description 65534 JANUARY MAINT PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11551 0 0175183 -IN 01/01/05 598.00 0.00 598.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 131 -13 -5260 598.00 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004/05k POLICE CAD /RMS SYSTEM HARDWARE MAINTENANCE, 24/7, CONTRACT 10170325-IN PO Liquidation Amount 131 -13 -5260 598.00 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 779 SO. CALIF. EDISON AP 148795 01/27/05 10,642.10 Claim# General Description 65738 ENERGY TRAFFIC SIGNALS POI Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11761 0 0 01119/05 92.25 0.00 92.25 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 121 -56 -5433 92.25 1 EA °ANNUAL- FY2004/05* ENERGY COST FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND STREET LIGHTS 117 -56 -5433 -053 0.00 1 EA ENERGY COST FOR METROLINK STATION AND PARK-N -RIDE LOTS PO Liquidation Amount 121-56 -5433 92.25 Claim# General Description 65739 SRV 11/08104 - 12/10/04 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11557 0 0 01/27/05 144.83 0.00 144.63 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 102 -42- 5433 -013 144.03 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2004 /05° MONTHLY ELECTRICITY SERVICE FOR MCNEILL MANOR PO Liquidation Amount CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N'APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) r;Tty of uaiawin NarK teb VU, IM UB:Aam I"aRe a Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00100 /0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #`s 148627 to 140909 Payment Type Check 102-42-5433 -013 144.03 Claim# General Description 65740 SRV- PARR /TEEN CENTER PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11750 0 0 01/19/05 10,405.02 0.00 10,405.02 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 127 -57 -5433 194.55 1 EA 'ANNUAL- FY2004/05* ENERGY COST FOR PARK BUILDINGS 100 -57- 5433 -211 10,210.47 1 EA ENERGY COST FOR TEEN CENTER PO Liquidation Amount 100 -57- 5433 -211 4,093.43 127- 57-5433 194.55 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 779 SO. CALIF. EDISON AP 148796 01/27/05 329.54 Y Claim# General Description 65741 SRV -HSG AUTH 2- 20-031 -7031 Claim# General Description 65744 PLAY STATION /GAMES PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/27/05 251.32 0.00 251312 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -76 -5210 251.32 PLAY STATION /GAGES CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11700 0 0 01/13/05 329.54 0.00 329.54 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 102 -42- 5433 -014 329.54 1 EA < ANNUAL- FY2004/05' MONTHLY ELECTRICITY SERVICES @ THE HOUSING AUTHORITY BUILDING PO Liquidation Amount 102-42-5433-014 329.54 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 3900 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPT OF TRANSP 1 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CASH AP 140797 01/27/05 277.86 Claim# General Description 65533 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11895 0 169334 12/17/04 277.06 0.00 277.86 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 121 -56 -5000 277.06 1 EA 'ANNUAL- FY2004/054 PARTICIPATING SHARES OF ELECTRICAL MAITNENANCE AND /OR OPERATION OF STATE HIGHWAY CONTROL & SAFETY INSTALLATIO (TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT RAMPS) PO Liquidation Amount 121-56 -5000 277.86 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 3520 TARGET AP 148790 01127/05 251.32 Claim# General Description 65744 PLAY STATION /GAMES PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/27/05 251.32 0.00 251312 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -76 -5210 251.32 PLAY STATION /GAGES CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of baldwin rarK teb 08, ZM 08:34am Page 56 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00 /00 /0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #'s 148627 to 145909 Payment Type Check ------------------------------------------------------------- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee 1396 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS Claim# General Description 65742 MISC S(PPLIES ----------------------------------------------------------------- Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 148799 01127/05 675,72 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12201 0 896190 11/10/04 125.72 0.00 125.72 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 11/15/04 121 -68 -5210 125.72 1 EA 'ANNUAL- FY2004/05$ SPRAY EQUIPMENT & CHEMICALS Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd (REPLACES PO #11608 CLOSED IN ERROR BY SYSTEM) PO Liquidation Amount 1 EA 'ANNUAL-FY2004 /05& SPRAY EQUIPMENT & CHEMICALS 121-68-5210 125.72 (REPLACES PO #11608 CLOSED Claim# General Description 65743 MISC SUPPLIES PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12214 C 896190 11/10/04 294.14 0.00 294.14 696966 11/15/04 455.86 0.00 455.66 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description PO Liquidation 121 -68 -5210 750.00 1 EA 'ANNUAL-FY2004 /05& SPRAY EQUIPMENT & CHEMICALS 1,950.00 (REPLACES PO #11608 CLOSED IN ERROR BY SYSTEM) PO Liquidation Amount 3932 TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL AP 148801 121-60 -5210 750.00 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7584 TELECOMMUNI CATIONS MANAGEMENT AP 140800 01/27/05 1,950.00 Claim# General Description 65746 CABLE TV CONSULTANT SRV (DEC) PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12210 0 9569-02 12/30/04 1,950.00 0.00 1,950.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 125.00 100 -02 -5000 11950.00 1 EA °ANNUAL-FY2004 105x CABLE TELEVISION CONSULTANT 125.00 0.00 SERVICES AGREEMENT Work Order# ActCd Description PO Liquidation Amount 100 -02 -5000 1,950.00 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 3932 TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL AP 148801 01/27 /05 525.00 Claims# General Description 65536 PEST CONTROL TEEN CENTER /CITY HALL OCT, NOV & DEC PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt 12289 0 101082873 10/18/04 146251975 11/22/04 171065075 12/13/04 101062923 10/16/04 146252025 11/22/04 171065125 12/13/04 GL Distribution Gross Amount CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 50.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 125.00 030 125.00 125.00 0.00 125.00 125.00 0.00 125.00 Work Order# ActCd Description By SANDRA A (SANDRA) 4l sy ur uatuwiif rai R rea UU, cova U ,) adM rage Dt Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00 /00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #'s 148627 to 148909 Payment Type Check 100 -57 -5000 375.00 1 EA 'ANNUAL- FY2004/05' PEST CONTROL AT CITY HALL 100 -57- 5000-211 150.00 1 EA 'ANNUAL- FY2004/05' PEST CONTROL AT TEEN CENTER PO Liquidation Amount 100 -57 -5000 375.00 100 -57- 5000 -211 150.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 3932 TERfMINIX INTERNATIONAL 1 TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER AP 148802 01/27/05 412.00 Claim# General Description 65537 TERMITE BAITING 3111/05- 3/31/06 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12290 C 0 12/31/04 412.00 0.00 412.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100-57-5000 412.00 1 EA SUBTERRANEAN TERMITE BAITING AT CITY HALL, 3/1/05 - 3/31/06 PO Liquidation Amount 100 -57 -5000 412.00 --------..----------------------------------------------------- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee 5862 THE COUNSELING TEAM Claim# General Description 65747 E PERIDA "PEER SUPPORT TRNG° 04/04/05 - 04/07105 ---------------------------------------------------------------- Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 148803 01/271105 195.00 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 4 01/27/05 195.00 0.00 195.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 106 -25 -5340 195.00 E PERIDA 04/04/05 - 04/07/05 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 15,862 THE COUNSELING TEAM AP 148804 01/27/05 195.00 Y Claim# General Description 65748 TUITION -R ESPARZA 04 /04/05 -04 /07/05 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/27/05 195.00 0.00 195.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 106 -25 -5340 195.00 R ESPARZA 4/4/05- 04/07/05 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N'APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) uiyct oaiawmpam nm vo, /mm mzo4am Page A Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 80/00/0000 to 99/93/9909 ChoCk/ACH#'o 14807 to 148909 Payment Type Check -___—_--_'__--_--______—____—____'__-___'—_—_'____-_____-_-______-______'_- Vend Vendor Name RemKf Payee Bank Chmki Chk Date Check Amount Sep 780 T8E GAS COMPANY AP 140805 01/27/05 38.48 CIaim0 General Description 65749 SRV'HSG NDH 067-018-4100'6 0GS,AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) PO08tat Contract#lnvoicef Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11556 8 0 12/31/04 23.84 0.00 25.84 8L Distribution . Gross Amount Work @,dor0 kotCd Description 102-42-5434'013 23.84 1 8\ ^ANNUXL FY20 4/0S* MONTHLY GAS SERVICE FOR MCNEDl ' MANOR PO Liquidation Amount 102-42'5434-019 23.84 CIoim8 SaDoraI Description 65750 3RV'HSS kUTH 148'910-4074'7 PO# St6t COotraCt# InvOiCe0 lnvo 0t 0rUoS Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Not Amount 11555 0 0 12/31/04 14.64 0.00 14.64 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rdVr# 6CtCd Description 102-42-5434'014 14.64 1 EA ^6NNU&L-FY2004105^ MONTHLY GAS SERVICE FOR THE ' HOUSING AUTHORITY BUILDING P0 Liquidation Amount ____'_____—_________—___—___________________-_____-__________-______ 102-42-54 14-014 14.64 V8nd8 Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Cknok0 Ckk Date Check Amount Soy 7658 TONY G8U8UA No 148806 01/27/05 171,95 CIaim# General 0myoriPtiOO 65751 R[IMD MONTHLY EXPENSES POI Stat CuUtraot# IovO|CoW lnYu 0t Gross Amount Discount 60t Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/27/05 171,95 0.00 171.05 8L Distribution Gross Amount Work &rd8r0 ACtCd Description ___________________________________________________________________ 106'25-5340 171.95 RElMO EXP VoDd8 Vendor Name R801t0 Payee Bank Cheuki Ckk Date Check Amount Sep 058 TRANSCONTINENTAL SALES CU &P 148807 01/27/05 262.72 Clai0# General Description ' 65539 UKBO8U ACCESSORIES PO# 8tat COUtramt0 Invwixof IovC 0t 8r0nu Amount Discount Amt 01VCu8Dt Used Met Amount 1015*5 12/15/04 262.72 0.00 262.72 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work 8rJor# AotCd Description 100-25-5210 ___________—_--___________—_'__________—_____--__—__________-__— 20,72 UNIFORM ACCESSORIES 0GS,AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) ul; or oamwm rum roo ou. Zmm ouuqdm poU :o Payment History. Bank &P Payment Dat8o'00/00/0000 to 90/99/9909 Cheuk/ACQ8'o 14807 to 140909 Payment Type Check ______________________________________________________________________ Vend Vendor Name Remitf Payee Bank Chemk0 Chk Date Check Amount 38y 814 TROPHY WORLD AP 140808 01/27/05 540.54 Claiml General Description 65540 VOLLEYBALL MEDALS POI3tat Contractf Immimf Dnvc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 3%7 12/14/04 540.54 0.00 549.54 SL Distribution 8moo Amount Work OrderV AdCd Description 150'00-2154 549.54 YOU EY0ALL MEDALS ____________________________________________________________________ VonJf Vendor Name Rnm1t0 Payee Bank 0ook0 Chk Date OmCk Amount 3oy 1116 UMI30URCE &P 148809 01/27/05 2'976.88 CI6im0 General Description 65543 REFUSE BAGS NN Shat Con ract8 Invnice# Imm 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12107 C 752 46740525 12/02/04 1.488,44 0.00 1,488.44 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work OrderV 6dCJ Description 117-69-5210-052 1.40U.44 50 C3 35 GALLON MRL-86 REFUSE BAGS PO Liquidation Amount 117'69'5210'052 1,472.20 Qaim#Seneral Description 65544 REFUSE BAGS POI St8t Con ractV Immiva# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12102 C 70 467/0495 12/02/04 1,408,44 0.00 1'408,44 SL Distribution GmoS Amount Work Order# AotCd Description 121-68-5210'211 1,488.44 50 C8 115 GALLON MRL'86 REFUSE BAGS PO Liquidation Amount 121-68-5210'211 1.472.20 ______-_____—___—_________—_________--__—______—_______________—___ VOnd0 Vendor Name Rem|t0Payne Bank Omd:f Chk Date Qmok Amount Sop 7659 UNITED DESK MFG. INC XP 148810 01/27/05 340.99 ' Cbim0 General Description 65752 FILE CABINET POf Std CoU r6C f IDvniCo# Invc Ut Gross Amount Discount Amt 0xnmmi Used Net Amount ' 1 01/17/05 340.99 0.00 340.90 SL Distribution &noS Amount Work Order0 8d0 Description 100-24-5210 340`99 FILE CABINET ___________________________________________________________________ CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) "'", ~ '~~~^' '~^ '^~ ``' ~^^ ^^~~~ 'jp `" Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check/ACH#'s 148627 to 140909 Payment Type Check __________________________________________________________________________ Voodf Vendor Name Remitf Payee Bank Chmk# Ckk Date Check Amount 3oy 5010 UNITED MAINTENANCE SERVICES AP 148811 01/27/05 9,725.00 Claim# General Description 65S41 JAN MAINT-TEEN CENTER POV Stad C0d0ct# lnvoicu0 lnvc [t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount ` 11730 O 6062 01/04/05 7,925.00 0.00 7.925.00 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rder# 6otCJ Description 100'57-5000 3.90.50 i EA *ANNU6 -R2004fD5^ JANITORIAL SERVICE, FOR CITY F6CILITIE8, GENERAL RJN0 POTION 127-57-5000 3,90.50 1 EA PARKS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PORTION ;O Liquidation Amount 100-57-5000 5.962.50 127'57-5000 3.90.50 Claimf General Description 05542 "NN MkINT-TEN CENTER POI Sbat Contrac f lmmicef lnvc Ut Gross Amount Discount Amt 0iuommt Used Net Amount 11740 O 600 01/04/05 1,300.00 0.00 1,300.00 8L Distribution Gross Amount Work Orden0 AutCd Description 100-57-000-211 1.300.00 1 EA ^ANNUAL'R2004/05^ JANITORIAL SERVICES AT TEEN CENTER PO Liquidation Amount 180-57-5000-211 1.300,00 CIaim8 S000rxl Description 65753 JAN MQNT PO#Stat Contrm±fImmice0 ImmDt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11558 O 6063 01/04/05 500.00 0.00 500.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order0ActCd Description 102-42-5420-014 500.00 1 EA ^ANNUAL FY2004/05^ FACILITY MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR THE HOUSING AUTHORITY BUILDING P0 Liquidation Amount 102-42'5420-014 500.00 __—_'_—___—_-_—___'---______—__________--___—_________—____—________' Vend# Vendor Name Remitt Payee 8aukChRuk# Qkk Date 09Ck Amount Sop 4329 UNITED RENTALS AP 148812 01/27/05 457.34 Claiml General Description 65545 STAKE TRUCK RENTAL POI Stat CooUrac 0 Immice# Invc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 45068315-001 12/14/04 301,46 0.00 301.40 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Urder# AotCd Description 100'72-5210 301.46 STAKE TRUCK RENTAL Cla1m0 Genera Description 6550 DRIH RENAL POI %tat Con ractl Immicef IDvC 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11741 0 4/434794-001 11/08/04 15538 0.00 155.88 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of 0a]dw|n Park Feb VU, Z005 08:346m Page N Payment History. Bank AP Payment 0nt8o 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9099 0ook/kCH0'o 14807 to 148809 Payment Typo Check SL Distribution Srmm Amount Work 0rder# AdCd Description 100'57-5ZM 155.88 1 [A ^ANNUNL-FY2004/05^ EQUIPMENT RENTAL FEES PO Liquidation Amount 100-57'5210 155.88 ______________________________________________________________________ Vondk Vendor Ham* Romit8 Payee Bank 0wck# Chk Dade Omok Amount So; 828 VALLEY COUNTY WATER AP 148813 01/27/05 59.04 Claiml General Description 65754 SR,i-HSG AUTH 2005-3 PO0 Stat Con rmt# Immicel Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount I1M4 O V 12/23/04 59.04 0.00 59.04 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rdur# ActCd Description 102-42-5432-013 58.04 1 EA ^ANNUAL R2004/05^ SERVICE FOR MCN[IL MANOR PO Liquidation Amount 102-42-5432'013 59.04 ___________________________________________________________________ Vord# Y8mNr Name Rem|t0 Payee Bank 0ock0 Ckk Date Check Amount Sep 391 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 1 VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 140014 01/27/05 1,195.78 Claim# General Description 65547 KAISER PERM ANTENNA A/C#011412121920684206 PO#Stat CoUtraci lnvmiuN 8L Distribution 100'23-5745 Imm Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net A0OU8t 12/19/04 43.32 0,00 43.32 Gross Amount Work Order0 AdCd Description 43.32 KAISER PERM ANTENNA Qa\0& General Description ' 65540 PAC 50 DATA 001 1412 1165750915 00 PO#Stat COUractl Immice# 8L Distribution 100-25-5430 ClaixN General Description 55549 PAC 54 DATA 01 1412 1189750010 00 POOStat Cmtrao0Imm1ce# SL Distribution 100'25-5430 Cla)m# General Description 65550 MOBILE PH LINE 01 1412 1160770115 01 P01 Stat Cunrad0Iov ice# SL Distribution 100'25-5430 Invc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12/25/04 258.32 0.00 258.32 8moS Amount Work Qrder0 kdC,d Description 258.32 181'3269 InmDt Gross Amount Discount Amt 0n0Unt Used Net Amount 12/25/04 42.34 0.00 42.34 Gross Amount Work Order# kdCd Description 42.34 337'509 lDvC Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12/07/04 104.23 0.00 104.23 Gross Amount Work Order0 &(tW Description 104.23 167-1383 Oaim# General Description 65551 SRV'0114i2i2073908M10 $126.53 011412122125346804 $432.56 01141212952475 2606 S 04.23 01141212892/75008 $ 84.24 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR1100 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of 0aidwin Parx Feb 08, 2005 08:34am Page 6Z Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #'s 148627 to 148909 Payment Type Check PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt 11770 0 0 12/13/04 GL Distribution Gross Amount 131 -14- 5430 -064 126.53 131 -14- 5430 -064 432.56 131 -14- 5430-064 94.24 131 -14 -5430 -064 94.24 PO Liquidation Amount 131 -14- 5430 -064 747.57 ---------------------------------------------------------- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee 3797 VERIZON WIRELESS MESSAGING SRV 100 -74 -5210 Claim# General Description 65552 PAGERS -INFO SRV A /C# L8- 454996 Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 747.57 0.00 747.57 Work Order# ActCd Description 334 -0615 197 -0343 472-0034 460 -1399 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 148816# 01/27/05 9.82 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Ot Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11621 0 L8454996FA 01/01/05 9.82 0.00 9.82 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 131 -13 -5210 9.82 1 EA •ANNUAL- FY2004/05* PAGER SERVICE FOR DAVID VILLELA (256 -5333) & NARK HSU €255 -0991) PO Liquidation Amount 131- 13 -5Z10 9.82 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 3797 VERIZON WIRELESS MESSAGING SRV AP 148817 01/27/05 11.92 Y Claim# General Description 65551, PAGERS SRV -JAN A /C# L8- 454956 POI Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11668 0 L0454956FA 01/01/05 11.92 0.00 11.92 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -71 -5210 0.00 1 EA 'ANNUAL- FY2004/05* PAGER RENTALS, PARKS & RECREATION DIRECTOR PORTION 100 -72 -5210 11.92 1 EA RECREATION SERVICES PORTION 100-73 -5210 0.00 1 EA SENIOR SERVICES PORTION 100 -74 -5210 0.00 1 EA FAMILY SERVICE CENTER 100 -75 -5210 0.00 1 EA CHILDRENS SERVICES PORTION 100 -76 -5210 0.00 1 EA TEEN CENTER PORTION PO Liquidation Amount 100 -72 -5210 -----..---.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11.92 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 3797 VERIZON WIRELESS MESSAGING SRV AP 148818 01/27/05 40.10 Y Claim# General Description 65554 PAGERS SRV - PUBLIC WORKS JANUARY L8- 454995 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt 11758 0 L8454995FA 01101105 GL Distribution Gross Amount 100 -57 -5210 20.05 CGS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 Grass Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 40.10 0.00 40.10 Work Order# ActCd Description 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004/05* PAGERS FOR THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, MAINTENANCE ADMIN PORTION By SANDRA A (SANDRA) 616y Qt +DdION111 FdrK rtu UU, LVU3 UO:J4dlfl rd�U OJ Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #'s 148627 to 148009 Payment Type Check 114 -59 -5210 -094 10.05 1 EA TRAFFIC CONTROL PORTION 117 -69- 5210-052 10.00 1 EA TRANSIT FACILITY MAINT PORTION 121- 67-5Z10 0.00 1 EA COURT REFERRAL PORTION 121- 68-5210 0.00 1 EA LANDSCAPE PORTION 130- 58-5210 0.00 1 EA FLEET SERV PORTION PO Liquidation Amount 100 -57 -5210 20.05 114 -59- 5210 -094 10.05 117-69 -5210 -052 10.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 3796 VIVIAN OLIVAS AP 148819 01/27/05 122.00 Claim# General Description 65755 REIMS MONTHLY EXPENSES POI Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/27/05 122.00 0.00 122.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount ;Mork Order# ActCd Description 106 -25 -5340 122.00 REIMB EXP --------..--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 3748 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SAN GABRIEL /PO AP 148820 01/27/05 323.26 Claim# General Description 65555 TRASH BIN SRV (SOFTBALL FIELD) A/C #012- 0099417 - 2519 -5 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11672 O 4666719 - 2519 -9 01101/05 138.58 0.00 138.58 GL Distribution Grass Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 150 -00 -2154 138.58 1 EA 'ANNUAL- FY2004/05' TRASH BIN SERVICE N SIERRA VISTA HIGH SCHOOL (3600 FRAZIER) FOR ADULT SOFTBALL PROGRArl PO Liquidation Amount 150-00 -2154 138.58 Claim# General Description 65756 JAN SERVICE POI Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11818 0 4666528- 2519 -4 01/01/05 184.68 0.00 184.68 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 102 -42- 5431 -013 184.68 1 EA 'ANNUAL- FY2004105' WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR MCNEILL MANOR PO Liquidation Amount 102 -42- 5431 -013 184.68 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 NIAPR700 By SANDRA A (.SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Feb 08, 2005 OU:34am Page 54 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00 /0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #'s 148627 to 148909 Payment Type Check --------------------------------------------------------- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee 831 WEST COVINA AUTO BODY INC. Claim# General Description 65757 AUTO BODY REPAIRS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 148821 01127/05 3,209.97 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12003 0 3124 11/30/04 426.66 0.00 426.66 1154143 12/10/04 2,691.24 0.00 2,691.24 284756 12123/04 60.99 0.00 60.99 3127 12/30/04 31.08 0.00 31.08 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 130 -58 -5270 3,209.97 1 EA 'ANNUAL- FY2004/05' AUTO BODY REPAIR AND PAINT PO Liquidation Amount 130 - 58-5270 -------..---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3,209.97 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 6467 WEST PAYMENT CENTER AP 148822 01/27/05 244.38 Claim# General Description 65538 SUBSCRIPTION PENAL CODE '05 PAMPHLET POI Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 107987423 12/20/04 244.38 0.00 244.38 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100-24 -5240 244.30 SUBSCRIPTION Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 6829 WIRELESS SPECIALISTS GROUP AP 141823 01127/05 21.64 Claim# General Description 65758 SUPPLIES POI Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 15245 12/02/04 21.64 0.00 21.64 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -23 -5210 21.64 SUPPLIES Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7092 JOHN PANIQUE AP 140824 01/27/05 2,358.50 Claim# General Description 65857 2 }2005 ADVANCED IND DISAB PNT PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12216 0 0 01/27/05 2,358.50 2,358.50 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -00 -1100 2,358.50 1 EA 'ANNUAL- FY2004/05" ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL DISABILITY PENSION PAYMENTS (TO BE REIMBURSED BY CALPERS ONCE RETIREMENT PAPAERS ARE FILED) PO Liquidation Amount 100 - 00-1100 2,358.50 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Feb 08, 2005 08:34a0 Page 65 Payment History. Bank AP Payment 0abm 00/00/0000 to 89/99/0909 Chook/6CH#'o 14807 to 149009 Payment Type Check __________________________________________________________________ Vnnd0 Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank CheCki Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7196 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMIN 6P 148825 01/27/05 2.546.13 CIoixN General Description 65856 INTEREST EARNED ON SEQUESTERED FUNDS IN LAIF ACCT POI Std Cootrmt0 I0m|mN Invc [t Gross Amount Discount Amt 8ioommt Used Met Amount 0 01/24105 2'546.13 2'546.13 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work OrJerl kdCCd Description 119-00-2040 2.540,13 INT'LklF FUNDS __________________________________________________________________ V8n6# Vendor Name R8mt# Payee Bank Chemk0 Chk Date Check Amount Sep 570 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE AP 148826 01/27/05 2,565.63 Cbim# General Description 65867 NOW MAILING Cla|m& General Description PO# StatContract# Invoicei Invc Ot Gross Amount Discount Ait,0iscount Used Net Amount A 02/01/05 70.77 0,00 763,77 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100'00-2231 688.00 K MART NEZ PP803 P/E: 01/20/05 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 8.\.3N"APR700 By SANDRA A(SANDRA) POI 3tatContracti Invoicel Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount ' 0 01/27/05 2,565^03 2.565,63 0L Distribution Gross Amount Work Ordert krtCd Description 100-81-5000 2.565.63 NOW MAILING ______'_____—___________---_____-__—______'__-_____—_—__________—___' Von60 Vendor Kamm Remit0 Payee Bank QmCk# Chk Date Qmok Amount Sep 1660 AMY HA@0lN WP 1488291 02/01/05 26,25 Cl6im# General Description 65765 KOV/D[C KIU[SHARE PRS P0# St6t CV8troCt# Invoioo# lmc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net 60oU8t 0 02/01/05 0.25 0.00 26.25 Si Distribution Gross Amount Work Orderl ACtCd Description 100-45-5335 0.25 NOV/DEC RIDESHkRE -----'----''_-'_'--'--_------_'--'_--_-_-_-_-__--__'_-_----__-'_-_-_'---_'_-_---'-__---'_-_----_'_--'' Vond# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Cheok# Chk Cato Omok Amount 3gy 6604 ANA ROSALES AP 148030 0201/05 0.00 ClaioN General Description . 65766 NOV/0EC KI0ESH�E PRS P00 Stat Co8trm±0 I00iC00 Imm 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt 01ocmmt Used Net 6No8Dt 0 02/01/05 29.00 0.00 29.00 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rdor0 ACtCJ Description ---'--''-'''_-_--'---'__'_------___-_-_-_-_'_'---_--_-_-_'__'—'_-_'_'_--''_'_-_-'-------'_-_'_'''---- 109-45-5335 29.00 NOV/DEC RIDESHARE PRS VonJK Vendor Wonm RVmit# Payee Bank Ch8Ck# Chk Unta Chock Amount Soy 7463 ANNA HARRIS AP 148831 02/01/05 70.77 Cla|m& General Description PO# StatContract# Invoicei Invc Ot Gross Amount Discount Ait,0iscount Used Net Amount A 02/01/05 70.77 0,00 763,77 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100'00-2231 688.00 K MART NEZ PP803 P/E: 01/20/05 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 8.\.3N"APR700 By SANDRA A(SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Feb 08, Z008 08:343M Page 66 Payment Kistmy, Bank AP Payment 0otao 00/00/0000 to 00/99/9990 0mok/AC Fn 14807 to 149909 Payment Type Check 100-00-2231 75.77 _____________________________________ Vond8 Vendor Name Remitt Payee 5238 ANTHONY VAZQUEZ Claim# General Description RUNRTINEZPPN)3 P/E: 01/29/05 ________________________________ Hank Qmd0 Chk Date 0mCk Amount Sop &P 140832 02/01/05 *5.00 POfStat ContractiImmicel lmm0 Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 02/01/05 45.00 0,00 45.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order0 &ct0 Description 100-45-5335 45.00 NOR/DEC RIDESHAKE PRG -----'---------------------------'----------------'-------'—'--------- Vnnd# Vendor Name Remit0 Payee Bank Ch8oki Chk Date Chock Amount Sep 006 ABJAK ID>&UI AP 148833 02/01/05 25.00 CIaim0 General Description PD1Stat Contract8Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt, Discount Used Net Amount A 02/01/05 25.00 ` 0.00 25.00 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work Order0 AotC4 Description 109-45-5335 25.00 NOV/DEC RIDESHARE PRG --'_'--'-''_-'_--------'--_'-',_-_-_-_-_-_'_-_'_-_-_-_-_-_-_''_-__'_--__'-__-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_'-'- V9nd# Vendor Name R8m\t0 Payee Bank CkBoki Chk 8ato Check Amount Sep 898 ART CAST8lkHO AP 148034 02/01/05 40.00 Cl8100 General Description PO# 3bd Cootract# INmiCe# IUvC [% Gross Amount Discount Ast Discount Used Net 6NVVnt 0 02/01/05 40.00 0.00 40.00 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work Urder0 AotCd Description 109-45-5335 40.00 NOV/DEC RI0ESHARE PRG _-_'__—__________________________________________—_-__-________—____- VenJf Vendor Name Re01t# Payee Bank Ckuuk* Chk Date Check Aammt Sop 6743 CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTIONS FRANCHIS AP 148835 82/01/05 25.00 Oa1ml General Description 65795 C83E# (S562-0609 0 FIBRR0 PPI03 P/E/ 01/29/05 PO#3tat Contracti Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount V 02/01/05 25,00 0.00 25.00 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work 8rder# AotCd Description 100'00'2231 25.80 G BERRO PP003 P/E/ 01/26105 ____________________________________________________________________ CCS.6P Accounts Payable Release 0.1.3 N*APR 00 By SANDRA k (SANDRA) City of %31dw}n Park Feb 08, ZN)k VH;Aam Page 67 Payment History. Bank &P Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 09109/9999 Check/ACH8'n 14807 to 140900 Payment Type Chock -___—_'--____—___--'_'_—____'__—___'_________'_-_---_---_-_'______—__-_____' Verdi Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank CNmk0 Chk Date Check Amount Sep 267 COURT TRUSTEE AP 140836 0/01/05 956.25 ClaiN4 General Description 65796 C6SE# N'0049165 D KOSAKA PP#03 P/E: 01/M/05 ' POI Stat Cootrmt8 Invoice0 IDvC Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Uinommt Used Not 60mmt A 02/01/05 956.25 0.00 956,25 GL Distribution SmSa Amount Work Order# kCt0 Description 100'00-2231 956,25 0 KOSAKA PPN03 P/[- 01/28/05 __________________________________________________________________ Vond# Vendor Name Remi0 Payee Bank 0wCk# Chk Date Qmok Amount Sop 267 COURT TRUSTEE AP 148837 0/01/05 586.48 Y CIaim# General Description 6570 1V'A3EA G00020435 A LOPEZ PP#M P/[/ 01/28/05 PO# Stat Cootract# lmmino# lovC 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Not Amount ' A 02/01/05 5D0,48 0.00 586,48 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rder# A:tCd Description 100-00-2231 586.48 A LOPEZ pP#03 01/29/05 '--_'-''-'--__'---_-_-_---'--'__---_-_--___-'--_'------_-_-'--_---_-_'---_---'_----_-_'_^_--__-_--'_- VOnd0 Vendor Nx0o Re0itt Payee 08Uk Ck8d0 Chk Date Check Amount Sep 267 COURT TRUSTEE AP 148838 02/01/05 207.76 Y Claim# GonomI Description 65790 CkSEf 8Y0594077 J 3ANCHEZ PP0A3 P/E: 81/29/05 PO& 8tat Cootraot0 Immioe# Invx 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 02/01/05 207.76 0.80 07.76 8L Distribution 8mSn Amount Work @rd8r0 8otCd Description 100-00-2231 ` 207.76 J 3ANCH[Z PP0O3 01/29/05 -------''--'-__'------_-_''----'_-_-_-_-__-'---__'_-_--__-__---__-_--'-_'_-_-_'--'_-'_-__-_----_'--- VoodA Vendor Name R8mit0 Payee Bank Ckoxk0 Chk 0@to Check Amount Sep 1417 DAVID VILLIL& AP 148839 02/01/05 52.50 C]aiml General 0000riytiOO 65770 NOV/DEC KI0ESHAKE PRS ' POV Stat Cowtrat# IUvoice# Invo Ut 00oS Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount V 02/01/05 32.50 0.80 32.50 SL Distribution 8r0on Amount Work Ord8rV hctCd Description 109-45-5335 32.6V NOV/DEC RT0ESHNRE PRS --------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- VonJl Vendor Name R8m|tf Payee Bank Ckock0 Chk Data Chock Amount 3nP 410 DON RODRlSU[Z AP 148840 02/01/85 42,50 Claim0 General Description 65771 M0V/0EC RID[3HARE PRS PO# Stat C8Utraoti IoVnicn0 Invc 0t SrOoS Amount Discount Amt QiDCoQDt Used Net Amount 0 02/01/05 0,50 0.00 42.50 GL Distribution 8rnoS Amount Work Ordnr0 AdCd Description 100'45-5335 42.54 NOV/DEC RIDEBHARE CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N^kPR70O By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Feb 08, 2005 08:34am Page 59 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #'s 148627 to 148909 Payment Type Check -- - ------ --------- --- ------ ------ ------ --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ------ ------ --- ------ --- --- --- ------------ --- - ------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7099 DORENE GARAY AP 148841 02101105 450.00 Claim# General Description 65799 CASE# 198989 H GARAY PP #03 PIE: 01/29/05 POI Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 02/01/05 450.00 0.00 450.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -00 -2231 450.00 H GARAY PP #03 PIE: 01/29/05 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 879 ELLEN PARKS AP 148842 02/01/05 40.00 Claim# General Description 65772 ROV /DEC RIDESHARE PRG PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 02/01/05 40.00 0.00 40.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 109 - 45-5335 40.00 NOV /DEC RIDESHARE PRG ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 6919 FERNANDO GRANADOS AP 148843 02/01/05 55.00 Claim# General Description 65773 NOV /DEC RIDESHARE PRG POI Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 02/01/05 55.00 0.00 55.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 109 -45 -5335 55.00 NOV /DEC RIDESHARE PRG Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 6650 GEORGE NELSON AP 148844 02/01/05 66.25 Claim# General Description 65774 NOV /DEC RIDESHARE PRG PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 02/01/05 66.25 0.00 66.25 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 109 -45 -5335 66.25 NOV /DEC RIDESHARE PRG Vend# Vendor Nam Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 1486 GUADALUPE VILLELA AP 148845 02/01/05 31.25 Claim# General Description 65775 NOV /DEC RIDESHARE PRG PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Ot Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 02/01/05 31.25 0.00 31.25 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 109 -45 -5335 31.25 NOV /DEC RIDESHARE CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Feh 00. 2005 00:34am Page 71 Payment History, Bank AP Payment [gtoo 00100/0000 to 99/99/9998 0ed/ACHI'n 14007 to 148909 Payment Typo Check ____________________________________________________________________________ Vondf Vendor Name Remitl Payee Bank Cheo 0 Okk Date Omok Amount Sep 6335 JESSE UHDZ @/ 140846 02/01/05 48.75 Oaim# General Description POf Stat Cmntrao 0 Invoioo# Imm 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 02/01/05 48.75 0.00 40.75 8L Distribution Gman Amount Work Nrdor# AciCd Description 100-45-5335 48.75 NOV/DEC RIUESHARE PRG __________________________________________________________________ VonJO Vendor Name Rem{t# Payee Dank Chmoki Ckk Date Check Amount Soy 7661 JOSE ALVAREN&A AP 14880 02/01/05 21.25 Cbiml General Description Oa\xN General Description ' 65779 KOV/DEC 0DESHARE PRG POI Stad COo root0 Iov i{m0 Invc Ni Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 02/01/05 43.75 0.00 43.75 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rdVr# ActCd Description 109-45-5335 43,75 NOV/0[C RI0ESHARE PR8 __________'________—________________-______—___—_—_—_____—________'' Vondl Vendor Nome RH0it& Payee Bank Ch8cki Ckk Date Qmok Amount Sop 5552 MICHELLE CkRDOKA Nz 148850 02/01/05 36.25 Cbim# General Description POI Sbd C0otroc 8 Iuv |cm# Invc Dt SnmS Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount V 02/01/05 36.25 0.00 36.25 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Orderl AdCd Description 100'45-5335 36.25 NOV/DEC RIDESHAR[ CC3.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N^kPR700 By SANDRA k (SANDRA) PO0 Sbd Contnact0 ImmiCn# Iovo 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 02/01/05 21.25 0.00 21.25 SL Distribution Smee Amount Work N.der8 ActCd Description 109'45-5335 21.25 NOV kIUESHARE PRG '----'-''-''--'----''—'-'-''-'-'''—'—'------'------'-----------''--'----'---'----------''----'—''---' Vond0 Vendor Name Remit0 Payee Bank Chooki Ckk Date Check Amount Sop 6707 LAURA AGUILERA AP 148848 02/01/05 41.26 CloimU General Description 85778 NOV/DEC KI0SKARE PRS PO# 3tat ContrxxtA Invnico# Invo 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used get Amount 0 02/01/05 41.20 0.00 41,26 SL Distribution 6mno kHmUut Work UrJurO kotCd Description 109-45-5335 41.0 NOV/DEC RIUESHAHE --'—' VVndV ''--''---'-'-'-----------'--'----'-------'—'---''—'---'---'-----'-----------'--'—'--------'-- Vendor Name R8mit# Payee Bank Ckwok@ Ckk Date Check ATioUOt Sep 4023 MARTHA ALYARE2 AP 148049 02/01/05 43.75 Oa\xN General Description ' 65779 KOV/DEC 0DESHARE PRG POI Stad COo root0 Iov i{m0 Invc Ni Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 02/01/05 43.75 0.00 43.75 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rdVr# ActCd Description 109-45-5335 43,75 NOV/0[C RI0ESHARE PR8 __________'________—________________-______—___—_—_—_____—________'' Vondl Vendor Nome RH0it& Payee Bank Ch8cki Ckk Date Qmok Amount Sop 5552 MICHELLE CkRDOKA Nz 148850 02/01/05 36.25 Cbim# General Description POI Sbd C0otroc 8 Iuv |cm# Invc Dt SnmS Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount V 02/01/05 36.25 0.00 36.25 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Orderl AdCd Description 100'45-5335 36.25 NOV/DEC RIDESHAR[ CC3.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N^kPR700 By SANDRA k (SANDRA) City Of Uabiwm YerK Feb U8, ZNU 08:}4am Page 13 Payment Hiotmy, bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Ckeok/ACHI'o 14807 to 140009 Payment Type Check __ ------------ Vond# ------------------------------ Vendor Name --------- --------- Rom t# Payee --------------------------------------------------------------------- Ka* Omd8 0k Date Check Amount Sep 606 MIKE MADRID AP 148851 0101/05 40.75 ClaioN General Description 65780 NOV/DEC 00ESHARE PRG PU8 Stot Contr3Ct# Immioe# Iw/o 0t Gross Amount 0io(muot Amt Discount Used Not Amount 0 02/01/05 48.75 0.00 48.75 6L Distribution 8ruao Amount Work Ordor# AdCd Description _______________________________________________________________________ 109'45-5335 48.75 NOV/DEC RI0ESHARE VOnd0 YordOr Name Romit0 Payee Hank CkoCk# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 6122 PATRICIA ADTEASA AP 148852 02/01/05 225.00 CIaimf General Description PO08tat Contracti Invoice# I�� Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 02/01/05 225,00 0.00 225.00 SL Distribution 6meS Amount Work Order0 AdCJ Description 100'00'2231 225.00 k RAMIREZ PP003 P/[: 01/29/05 -------- Vnndf Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Ckock0 Ckk Date Check Amount Soy 864 P[R3-RETIREMENT AP 148853 02/01/05 035 CI8iN0 General Description 65800 RETRO PMTS PP# 02 P/E: 01/15/05 SVC PER: 01-05-4 PO# Sbd Contrmt0 Imm1m# InvC Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt 8ioum0t Used Net Amount U 02/01/05 87.95 0.00 97.95 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work Drder# ActCd Description 100'00-2205 0.95 R[00 PMT PP#0 P/[: 01/15105 01-05-4 ____'____-_—_-__'—_—___—_______—__________-__________—______________' Vond0 Vendor Name Romit& Payee Dank CkwCk0 Ckk 08t0 Check Amount Sep 864 PER8-RETIREMENT 8P 140854 0/01/05 1,315.43 Y Ooiml General Description 65801 PERS RETRO PMTS PP# 3 P/E 01/29/05 SYC PER: 0-05-3 PO& Stot CnDtra t# l0mice8 Imm Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt 0iSCm0t Used Net Amount 0 0/01/05 1,315.43 0.00 1,315.43 SL Distribution @0oa Amount Work 8rder# AotCd Description 100'00'2205 722.33 RETRO PP003 01/29/05 SRV 0'05-3 100'00-2305 593.10 RETRO PP003 01/21108 SRV 02-05-3 _____________________________________________________________________ CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Daidwm Park Feb 08' ZND 0U:34am Page 74 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check/ACH#'s 148627 to 148909 Payment Type Check _______________________________________________________________________ &end0 Vendor Name Remit8Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 727 PETTY CASH AP 148855 02/01/05 776.55 CIaio# General Description 65793 REPLENISH PETTY CASH PO# Sbt Contrau i lmmiuo# Imm Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt UiSCmmt Used Net Amount 0 0101/05 776.53 0.00 776.55 SL Distribution SmuS Amount Work Order# Aot0 Description 100-12'5330 58.49 H APUD 0\ 100'72-5210 1.08 A R0JO 100-23-5210 30,28 C H0FFORD 100-76'5210 39.81 H HERN&KDEZ 100'73-5210 30.26 I GARCIk 100-72'5210 2.07 A MAYA 100-71-5210 25.74 M CARRILLO 100-71'5330 22,38 M CARROLLO 101-48-5210'025 30.80 M PI0ZO 150-00-2187 30.39 0 REYK03O 100'73-5210 35.0 l S&RCIA 100-71-5330 ' 10,00 M 0\R0LLD 100-72-5530 10.00 M CARRILL8 106-25'5340 8,66 D MkDSEN 100'25-5210 15,0 0 MADSEN 150-AV-2187 15.09 0 REYM03O 100'73-010 2.24 I 6ARCl6 100-81'5000 34.17 R CABALLERO 100-03-5210 71,38 R RAMIREZ 100-52-5340 15.00 A IDMANI ' 100'21-5330 40.34 M MONTENEGRO 100-21'5330 40.18 L RUUI0 101-12-5320 12.08 L YlL8N 150-00'2169 45.00 l SkRClA 132-16-5000 30.40 K BOUT ON 100-02'5330 0.O9 K 80UTON 100'81-5330 _-__—_—____—________-_____-______—______—_—___-_'_---_-_-________—_-__— 56,51 S SA1C[80 Vend Vendor Nam RemiC# Payee 8eDk Cheok0 Chk Date Check Amount Sep 5560 R6FAEL PENA AP 148056 0/01/05 47.50 Ouim& General Description PO#Stat Contracti Invoicel lnvc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 02/01/05 47.50 0.00 47,50 GL Distribution S0uu Amount Work 0rder0 &xtCd Description 100-45-5330 47.50 NON/DEC RIDESHAKE __________________________________________________________________ CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Feb 00, 2005 08:34am Page 75 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/9919999 Check /ACH #'s 148627 to 148909 Payment Type Check ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 4191 RAMON BURGOS AP 146857 02/01/05 47.50 Claim# General Description 65783 NOV /DEC RIDESHARE PRG PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 02/01105 47.50 0.00 47.50 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 109 -45 -5335 47.50 NOV /DEC RIDESHARE PRG ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 719 RAY PAQUIN AP 148858 02/01/05 22.50 Claim# General Description 65784 NOV RIDESHARE PRG PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 02/01/05 22.50 0.00 22.50 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 109 - 45-5335 22.50 NOV RIDESHARE PRG ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Nare Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 4406 RIVERSIDE CO DIST ATTORNEY AP 148859 02/01/05 326.00 Claim# General Description 65803 CASE# 404477DAl K KIRKMAN PP 03 P /E: 01/29/05 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 02/01/05 326.00 0.00 326.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -00 -2231 326.00 K KIRKMAN PP #03 P /E; 01/29/05 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 5899 RO°SA CABALLERO AP 148860 02/01/05 20.63 Claim# General Description 65785 NOV /DEC RIDESHARE PRG PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 02/01/05 20.63 0.00 20.63 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 109 -45 -5335 20.63 NOV /DEC RIDESHARE Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 5724 RUGEN T GARCIA AP 148861 02/01/05 35.00 Claim# General Description 65786 NOV /DEC RIDESHARE PRG POI Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt 0 02/01/05 GL Distribution Gross Amount 109-45 -5335 35.00 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 NIAPR700 Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 35.00 0.00 35.00 Work Order# ActC4 Description NOV /DEC RIDESHARE PRG By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Feb 08, 2005 08:34am Page 77 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check/ACH#'s 148627 to 148909 Payment Type Check _____________________________________________________________________________________ Vend Vendor Name Rom 0 Payee Bank ChemkV Ook Date 0ook Amount Sep 4105 SAN BERNARDINO CHILD SUPPORT PMTS AP 140862 02/01/05 25.00 Oaim& General Description 55804 0SE1 000037753 S BERR0 PPA 3 P/E� 01/29/05 POf Stat ContBcti Invoioe# InmDt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 0/01/05 25.00 0.00 0.00 GL Distribution &non Amount Work Orderf AdCd Description 100'00-2231 25.00 S BERRO PP# 3 01/20/05 ___________________________________________________________________ Vard0 Vendor Name Remitt Payee Bank Omck0 Ckk 06ta Check Amount Soy 14507 SHARON RIY[RA AP 148863 02/01/05 36.25 Claim0 General Description 65787 K0V/0EC kl0[SHkRE P8S POI Jtat CnDtrJc # InvO m0 lUvo Ut Gross Amount 0ioommt Amt 0ioommt Used Met Amount 0 0/01/05 36.25 0.00 36.25 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work 0rderV AdCd Description 109-45-5335 36.25 NOV/DEC HlUESHAHE PRG __-_'_—__________________—__________—_______-__________'_____—_—___— Vond0 Vendor Wemo R8mitt Payee Bank 0uck0 Ckk 08to Check Amount Soy 4283 SHARON THOMPSOM AP 148864 02/01/05 103.45 Cla|08 General Description PO#Stat Contractl Immice0 Invc0 Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 02/01/05 103,45 0.00 103,45 SL Distribution Qnno Amount Work Order# ACtCd Description 100-45-5335 103.45 NON/DEC RIDESHARE PR6 __________________________________________________________________ Vond0 Vendor K8N8 Remit# Payee Bank CkaukV Ckk Date 0mok Amount 38y 7274 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION CENTRA AP 148065 02/01/05 058.51 Cl3in# General Description 05805 A/C#cjR AP 017731279 WILLIAM E VAN CLEAVE SS# 555981650 PP#03 P/E: 01/29/05 PO0 Stat Con ract0 IDvnico0 Iwc [t Gross Amount Discount Aid Discount Used Net Amount 0 02/01/05 658.51 0.00 668,51 8L Distribution Gross Amount Work Ordor# AotCd Description 100-00-2231 658.51 VAN CLEAVE PP#03 01/25/05 ________________________________________________________________________ Vandf Vendor Name Remit0 Payee Bank Chod# Ckk Date Check Amount Soy 4159 SUZlE KUBAS AP 148866 02/01/05 24.38 Oaim0 General Description PO# Stat Cmntmc# IovmimN Imm[t � A2/01/V5 SL Distribution Gross Amount 100-45-5335 24.30 CGS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Not Amount 24.38 0.00 24.38 Work 0rderX &ot0 Description By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Feb 0H, Z005 UH:34am Page 79 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/0010000 to 99/99/9949 Check /ACH #'s 148627 to 148909 Payment Type Check ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Naas Remit! Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 2463 TIN KINNAN AP 148867 02/01/05 41.25 Claim# General Description 65790 NOV /DEC RIDESHARE PRG PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 02/01105 41.25 0.00 41.25 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 109 -45 -5335 41.25 NOV /DEC RIDESHARE PRG ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 856 VICTORIA VALVERDE AP 148868 02/01/05 31.25 Claim# General Description 65791 NOV /DEC RIDESHARE PRG POI Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Ot Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 02/01/05 31.25 0.00 31.25 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 109 -45 -5335 31.25 NOV /GEC RIDESHARE PRG Vend Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 2462 WENDY S LENN HARRIS AP 148869 02/01/05 18.75 Claim# General Description 65792 NOV SUBSIDY PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 02/01/05 18.75 0.00 18.75 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 109 -45 -5335 18.75 NOV RIDESHARE PRG Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 6231 ACC BUSINESS AP 148871' 02/02/05 1,141.30 Claim# General Description 65806 LONG DISTANCE PH SRV 11/11/04-12/10/04 A/000001146915 POs Stat Contracts Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11772 O 0433451487 12/27/04 1,141.38 0.00 1,141.30 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Orders ActCd Description 131-14 -5430 -064 1,141.38 1 EA 'ANNUAL- FY2004/05' LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES PO Liquidation Amount 131-14-5430 -064 1,141.38 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N'APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin park Feb 08, 2005 08:34am Page 80 Payment history. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #'s 148527 to 148909 Payment Type Check ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check! Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7615 AMERICAN ASSOC OF CODE ENFORCEMENT AP 148872 02/02/05 120.00 Claim# General Description 65807 DUES-SUZIE AYALA GEORGE NELSON PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Ot Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount AACE102208 02/02/05 60.00 0.00 60.00 AACE101045 10/14/04 60.00 0.00 60.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description Chk Date Check Amount Sep 100-47 -5180 120.00 AP 148874 S AYALA /G NELSON ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Nam Remit# Payee Bank Check# - - - - -- Chk Date Check Amount Sep 1180 DURHAM SCHOOL SERVICES AP 148873 02/02/05 2,059.34 Claim# General Description 65808 TRANSPORTATION CAMP GILMORE P0# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0217658 10/29/04 2,099.34 0.00 2,099.34 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 117 -55- 5000 -172 2,099.34 CAMP GILMORE Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 4107 OFFICE DEPOT, INC. AP 148874 02/02/05 128.63 Claim# General Description 65813 DISC SUPPLIES PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 269444686 -001 12127/04 129.63 0.00 128.63 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -24 -5210 128.63 MISC SUPPLIES CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N'APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Feb 08, 2005 08:34am Page 81 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #'s 148627 to 148509 Payment Type Check ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 136 OFFICEMAX-A BOISE CO AP 148875 02/02/05 213.40 Claim# General Description 65809 MSC SUPPLIES PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Ot Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11603 0 139486 11/04/04 111.87 0.00 111.87 0.00 653457 12/06/04 63.57 0.00 63.57 Description 153517 12/08/04 -49.48 0.00 - 49.48 824145 12/14/04 51.60 0.00 51.60 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 65811 SUPPLIES 121 - 68-5210 177.56 1 EA 'ANNUAL- FY2004/051 REPLACEMENT FAX CARTRIDGES PO Liquidation Invoice# Amount Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used 121 -68 -5210 11777 O 11.01 12/14/04 17.35 Claim# General Description 65810 NISC SUPPLIES PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0.00 2,807.34 035899 12/29104 12.80 0.00 12.80 GL Distribution 10/23/04 SRV: 10 -04 -4 Gross Amount Rork Order# ActCd Description 10/23/04 SRV: 10 -04 -4 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 100 -23 -5210 12.80 MISC SUPPLIES Claim# General Description 65811 SUPPLIES PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Ot Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11777 O 821036 12/14/04 17.35 0.00 17.35 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100-02 -5210 17.35 1 EA 'ANNUAL- FY2004105' OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR ADMINISTRATION PO Liquidation Amount 100 -02 °5210 17.35 Claim# General Description 65812 SUPPLIES PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 969464 12131/04 5.69 0.00 5.69 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -76 -5210 5.69 SUPPLIES Vend# vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 864 PERS- RETIREMENT AP 148876 02/021/05 2,807.34 Claim# General Description 65814 PART TIME RETIREMENT PP #22 P /E: 10/23/04 SRV PER: 10-04 -4 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 02/02105 2,807.34 0.00 2,807.34 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100-00 -2205 2,644.25 P/T 122 PE: 10/23/04 SRV: 10 -04 -4 100- 00 -Z223 93.93 P/T 122 PE: 10/23/04 SRV: 10 -04 -4 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Feb 08, 2005 08:34am Page 82 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #'s 148627 to 148909 Payment Type Check 100 -00 -2305 69.16 P/T #22 PE: 10/23/04 SRV: 1014-4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 5025 REPCO CONST AP 148877 02/02/05 350.00 Claim# General Description 65815 i1ISC REPAIRS PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 211204 12/21/04 350.00 0.00 350.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 102 -42- 5211-013 350.00 REPAIRS ----_----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 6640 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC AP 148878 02/02/05 8,436.76 Claim# General Description 65816 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12119 0 1680 01/07/05 1,668.66 0.00 11668.66 1681 01/07/05 2,419.76 0.00 2,419.76 1754 01/09/05 1,771.55 0.00 1,771.55 1755 01/09/05 1,654.83 0.00 1,654.83 1756 01/09/05 921.96 0.00 921.96 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 121 -56 -5000 8,436.76 1 EA ¢ANNUAL- FY2004105' REPAIR OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND CITY -OWNED STREET LIGHTS THROUGHOUT THE CITY PO Liquidation Amount 121 -56 -5000 8,436.16 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 2256 ROYAL COACHES AUTO BODY AP 148879 02/02/05 760.00 Claim# General Description 65817 TOWING SERVICE PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11840 0 057015 12/01/04 70.00 0.00 70.00 057045 12/13/04 70.00 0.00 70.00 056783 12/16/04 620.00 0.00 620.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 130 -58 -5270 760.00 1 EA 'ANNUAL- FY2404/05' COLLISION DAMAGE REPAIR AND TOWING PO Liquidation Amount 130 -58 -5270 760.00 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N'APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Feb 08, 2005 08:34am Page 83 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACM #'s 148527 to 148909 Payment Type Check ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7662 SAMUEL VARELA AP 148880 02102105 50.00 Claim# General Description 65818 DEPOSIT REFUND C&D PRG PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 02/02105 50.00 0.00 50.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 129-00 -2075 50.00 REFUND C &D PRG --------..--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 754 SAN GABRIEL VALLEY NEWSPAPER GROUP AP 148881 02/02/05 177.40 Claim# General Description 65824 AD4 118478 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11896 0 118478 01/14/05 86.00 0.08 86.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -52 -5240 86.00 110478 PO Liquidation Amount 100 -52 -5240 86.00 Claim# General Description 65825 AD# 112896 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11860 0 112896 01/07/05 91.40 0.00 91.40 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100- 03-5240 91.40 112896 PO Liquidation Amount 100 -03 -5240 91.40 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of 06b1wm Yarx �mk oU, ZU0 06:34am Page Ug Payment History. Bank AP Payment 0uton 00/00/0000 t8 99/9919999 Qmok/ACH0'o 14807 to 140909 Payment Typo Check ___________________________________________________________________ VorN0 Ymndn, Name Rom t& Payee Bank Qmok0 Ckk Date Qmok Amount Sop 3253 SAK 8ABRI8- VALLEY TRIBUNE AP 148882 0/02/05 1.220.70 Claim# General Description 65819 PUBLICATION A00 39085 A/C0iL9604011 POI Stat CootmCt# Immiom0 Invo 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 30085 01/14/05 174.20 0.00 174.20 8L Distribution Gross kNoUUt Work 0rder0 AotCd Description 100'45-5240 174.20 3SV05 Claim0 Son8ml Description 05820 k0{39275 P00 Stat Cuntract8 I0mica# Invo [t Gross Amount Discount Amt 8iaom0t Used Net Amount 39275 41/07/05 167.00 0.00 167,00 8L Distribution Gross Amount Work Ordurf ActCd Description 116-53-5000'804 167.00 A0# 39275 Claim0 General Description 658Z1 A8010506 PD0 St6t COntraCt# lnvnicm8 lnvo 0t SmSu Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 105806 12/30/04 284.00 0.00 284.00 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work Ordor8 AotCd Description 100'45-5240 284.00 A09105006 Cloi0# General Description 65822 AD#4360 ' P00 St3t Contr6Ct0 lnvoioo# Iovc Ut SrOSe Amount Discount Amt D|SnoUQt Used Net Amount 43697 11/00/04 115.70 0.00 115.70 SL Distribution 8rOS8 Amount Work OrdorO ACtCd Description 120-43'5240-030 115.70 143697 CIaixN General Description 65823 PUBLICATIONS A0&30892-144.50 41005'335.30 P00 Sbt Wntract# Immim;# Inv: 0t Sruoo Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 30092 01/05/05 479.80 0.00 479.80 SL Distribution @0uS Amount Work 8rder8 AotCJ 0mmripUnO 100-45'5240 144.50 30832 -''__—_-_______-_______-____-_-_-_______--_______________—__-_____—_-___ 100-45'5240 335.30 41005 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baidwin Park Feb 08, 2005 08:34am Page 85 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00 /00 /0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #'s 148627 to 148909 Payment Type Check _----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 5191 SCHOOL TECH, INC. AP 148883 02/02/05 157.64 Claim# General Description 65826 REPLACEMENT ITEMS PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 155984 GL Distribution 100 -25 -5210 Claim# General Description 65827 MISC SUPPLIES Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12/28/04 26.70 0.00 26.70 Gross Amount Work Order# Acted Description 26.70 REPLACEMENT ITEMS POI Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 157536 01/13/05 130.94 0.00 130.94 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# Acted Description 100 -25 -5210 130.94 SUPPLIES ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 5439 SERVICE FIRST CONTRACTORS NETWORK, AP 148684 02/02/05 272.65 Claim# General Description 65828 POOL SUPPLIES PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11737 0 1770 01/17/05 197.65 0.00 197.65 1794 01/18/05 75.00 0.00 75.00 GL Distribution Grass Amount Work Order# Acted Description 127 -57 -5000 272.65 1 EA 'ANNUAL- FY2004/05' SWIMMING POOL EQUIPMENT REPAIR PO Liquidation Amount 121 -57 -5000 272.65 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Ghk Date Check Amount Sep 5129 30. CAL TRACTOR SALES, INC. AP 148885 02/02/05 400.22 Claim# General Description 65833 MISC PARTS /SERVICE PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11842 0 41973 12/07/04 400.22 0.00 400.22 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# Acted Description 130 -58 -5210 400.22 1 EA 'ANNUAL- FY2004/05' PARTS & SERVICE FOR BOBCAT TRACTOR UNIT #5069 PO Liquidation Amount 130 -58 -5210 400.22 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N'APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Feb 00. 2005 00:34am Page 86 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Bates 00/00/0000 to 9S/09/9999 Cheok/ACH#'» 148627 to 140909 Payment Type Check ________________________________________________________________________ Vend# Vendor Name Remit[ Payee Bank Check# ChkData Check Amount Sep 7663 0TERO R8U RB AP 148886 02/02/05 15.00 CIaim# General Description 65820 REFUND-MAGIC MT PU0 Stat Cuntroct# Im0icn0 Iovx 0t Gross Amount 0io(oUMt Amt 0iummUt Used Net Amount 0 02/02/05 15.00 0.00 15.00 SL 8iat[i4otioU Gross Amount Work 0rdort hotCd Description 150-00-2172 15,00 REFUND-MAGIC MT ________________________________________________________________________ Vond& Vendor KaN8 R00|tt Payee Bank 0onk0 Chk Cato Check Amount Sop 783 'STAMP OUT' AP 140807 0/02/05 223.10 Qa1ml General Description 65830 ENGRAVED SIGNS PO# Stat Cun ract0 Im0ice# Iwm 0t SnsS Amount Discount Amt 0inom0t Used Net Amount 5S80 01/12/05 63.22 0,00 0.22 5969 01/13105 159.88 0.00 159.88 SL Distribution S0oo Amount Work Urdorf AdCd Description 100-57'5210 223.10 ENGRAVED SIGNS _'_-____-___--_—__'_________—______-_-_'____-_-_-__—__—_'__________-_-_-_- VmuJf Vendor Name RoNit0 Payee Bank (hook0 Ckk Date Check Amount Soy 7461 STEINY AND COMPANY INC AP 140888 02/02/05 314,207.15 Qaiml General Description PO# Stad Cmdrad# Immie# Iovx [t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 1061 O 470-00 01/13/05 16,07.36 0.00 18.077.36 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work @rder# AutCd Description 118'53-5020-881 16'077.36 1 EA ^ANN06L-FY2004/05^ INSTALLATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT FR&NClS[NITO & SARVEY, CIP 881 118-55-500-081 0.00 1 EA 10% CONTINGENCIES PO Liquidation Amount 118-53-5020'881 16,077.36 Claw General Description 65832 B0 SRV 8AL0W N PK/RAMONk POI StatContract#Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11963 8 470-003 01/13/05 10,129.79 0.00 18'129.79 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order0 AotCd Description 118-55-5020'882 0.128.70 1 EA *kHNU6L-FY2004/054 INSTALLATION OF TRAFFIC, SIGNAL AT EARL I RAMONN, CIP 892 1Y8'0-5020-882 0.00 1 EA 109 COK IW8EQCIES PO Liquidation Amount 118-53-5020'882 18'125.79 ___________________________________________________________________ CCS.8P Accounts Payable KoIeaS8 6.1.3 N^APR 00 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) Qty of Baldwin Part Feb 08. Z008 08:34aN Page 87 Payment History. Bank 8P Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 90/99/9909 Chook/ACH8's 148627 to 140909 Payment Type Check _________________________________________________________________________ Von # Vendor Name ReN|t# Payee Bank Check0 Ckk Data Check Amount Sep 3932 TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL AP 140989 02102/05 45.00 Claiml General Description 65834 PEST CONTROL SRV PON Stad Contrmt# Immicm0 lwm 8t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Not Amount 11918 U 194228475 01/05/05 45.00 0.00 45.00 GL Distribution &nsu Amount Work OrdorU AdCd Description 102'42'5030-014 45.00 i EA GENERAL PEST CONTROL 0 HOUSING AUTHORITY PD Liquidation Amount 102'42-5030-014 45,00 _____________________________________________________________________ Verdi Vendor Name Romit0 Payee Bank 0uck# Ckk Date Check Amount Sep 2685 THE SHREDDERS NP 148890 02/02/05 84.50 Claim# General Description 65835 SHREDDING SRV PO# Stat Cootron # Immicel 61315 SL Distribution 100-12-5210 Claim0 0oDorol 0mmri;tinD 65836 SHREDDING SRV POf Stat Contmct0 Immice# 61404 SL Distribution 100-29-5210 _______________________ V8n 0 Vendor Name 958 TRANSCONTINENTAL SALES CO CIaim0 General Description 65B40 UNIFORM SUPPLIES lmc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt 0iSo00t Used Net Amount 12/31/04 29.50 0.00 0.50 8mus Amount Work Nrderl 6otCd Description 29.50 SHREDDING SRV Imm0t Gross Amount NomUnt Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12/31/04 55.08 0.00 55.00 Gross Amount Work 0[der# AdCd Description 55.00 SHREDDING SRV _______________________________________________ ReN1t# Payee Bank C&8nk0 Chk 86t8 Chock Amount Soy Nm 148801 02/02/05 123.25 PO0 Stat COn mo # Invo1Ce0 Invc NL Gross Amount 0SCm0t Amt Discount Used Net Amount 18170 01/11105 123.25 0.00 123.25 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work OrderlAd0 Description 100-25-5210 123.25 UNIFORM SUPPLIES ________________________________________________________________________ GCS.NP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*XPR700 by SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Feb 08, 2005 08:34am Page 88 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #'s 148627 to 148909 Payment Type Check --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee 814 TROPHY WORLD Claim# General Description 65837 PRIDE PLATOON PLAQUES --------------------------------------------- Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 148892 02/02/05 446.00 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount Net Amount 3999 01/14/05 102.30 0.00 102.30 GL Distribution 267.92 Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description Gross Amount 150- 00-2187 Description 102.30 PRIDE PLATOON PLAQUES 100 -81 -5210 Claim# General Description CITY TILE PLAQUES ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name 658.338 PLAQUES -SR CTZ VOLUNTEERS Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount Claim# 3988 01/05/05 75.78 0.00 75.78 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -73 -5210 75.78 PLAQUES -SR VOLUNTEERS Claim# General Description 65839 CITY TILE PLAQUES CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 3904 12/28/04 267.92 0.00 267.92 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -81 -5210 267.92 CITY TILE PLAQUES ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7011 UNITED TRAFFIC SERVICES AP 148893 02/02/05 667.90 Claim# General Description 65841 TRAFFIC CONES PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12298 C B893 01/12105 667.90 0.00 667.90 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActC4 Description 100 -27 -5210 303.40 50 EA 18" TRAFFIC CONE, ENGRAVED "BALDWIN PARK PD" 100 -27 -5210 364.50 30 EA 28" TRAFFIC CONE, ENGRAVED "BALDWIN PARK PD" PO Liquidation Amount 100 -21 -5210 667.90 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) Gity of Uaidwin ParK Feb 08, ZU09 08:34am Page 89 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00 /00 /0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH#'s 148627 to 148909 Payment Type Check ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 3895 USA ALARM SYSTEMS, INC. AP 148894 02/02/05 1,323.00 Claim# General Description 65842 SECURITY MONITORING (FEB) PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11742 0 58150 02/01105 1,190.00 0.00 1,110.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -57 -5760 555.00 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004/05$ LEASE OF ALARM EQUIPMENT & MAINTENANCE SERVICES AT CITY FACILITIES, GENERAL FUND PORTION 127 -57 -5760 555.00 1 EA PARKS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PORTION PO Liquidation Amount 100 - 57-5760 555.00 127 -57 -5760 555.00 Claim# General Description 65843 SECURITY MONITORING 02 /01105- 02/28/05 FIR SRV /MONITORING 02/01/08 - 02/28105 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 NIAPR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) POI Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11743 0 58410 02/01/05 105.00 0.00 105.00 58416 02/01/05 108.00 0.00 108.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -57- 5760 -211 105.00 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2004/05$ LEASE OF ALARM EQUIPMENT & MAINTENANCE SERVICE FOR TEEN CENTER 100 -57- 5000 -211 108.00 1 EA BI- ANNUAL FIRE INSPECTION SERVICE PO Liquidation Amount 100 -57- 5000 -211 36.00 100 -57- 5760 -211 105.00 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 391 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 1 VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 148895 02/02 105 6,158.68 Claiml General Description 65844 CITY PH SRV- 6126.17 M CONTRERAS- 32.51 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Grass Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11770 0 0 12/19/04 6,158.68 0.00 61158.58 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 131 -14- 5430 -064 32.51 M CONTRERAS 131 -14- 5430 -064 6,126.17 CITY PH SRV PO Liquidation Amount 131 -14 -5430 -064 6,158.68 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 NIAPR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of 0a1dwm Park �8k VU. Z005 08:34am Page 90 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99199/9999 Check/ACHI's 148627 to 140909 Payment Type Check ___________________________________________________________________________ Vend# Vendor Name Remit0 Payee Bank CheckU Chk Dada Omok Amount Sep 391 VERIZON CALIFORNIA I VERIZON CALIFORNIA AP 148996 02/02/05 208.60 Y ClaimA General Description 65845 P.D. MOBILE PH SRV 011412116077011501 POI Stat Contract#INm1m# Dnvc Ot Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/07/05 208.60 0.00 208.60 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order0 ActCd Description 100'25-5430 208,60 i67-i,393 ______________________________________________________________________ Vondf Vendor Name Romit# Payee Bank ChOCk# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 3707 VERI20N WIRELESS MESSAGING SRV AP 148897 0/02/05 19.65 Claim# General Description PO# Stad CuOtrmt# Inv ioo# Imc Ut Gross Amount Discount Amt 0ioxmmt Used Net Amount 11870 O L8454947FA 01/01/05 10.65 0,00 19.65 GL Distribution S0SS Amount Work Drde[f kct0 Description 100'46-5210 9.82 i 0 ^ANNN&L-FY2004/05* PAGER SERVICE FOR BUILDING INSPECTORS (P LlM & M TER8W) 120-47-5210-031 9.83 1 [A PAGER SERVICE FOR C08[ ENFORCEMENT (S 8YAL6) PO Liquidation Amount 100-46-5210 9.82 120'47'S210-031 9.83 ` _____________________________________________________________________ V8nd# Vendor Name Remit#Payee Bank 0ock0 Chk Date Check Amount Sep 3797 V[RIZ0N WIRELESS MESSAGING SRV AP 148898 02/02/05 0.81 Y ClaioN General Description 65047 PAGER SRV 1/15/05-2/14/05 A/C1 LO-612529 POI Stat Contracti Invo|ce# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 1_8812929FA 01/15/05 9.81 0.00 9.81 8L Distribution Gross Amount Work UTderV ActCd Description 102-42-5210'014 9.91 SRV 1/15/05'2/14/05 ______________________________________________________________________ Vendl Vendor Name Ro0|t0 Payee Bank Ckook0 Chk Date Check Amount 8oP 7664 VERONICA EKRI0UEZ AP 148899 02/02/05 15,00 CI8iN0 General Description 05840 REFUND-MAGIC MT` PO8 Stat Co0tr3ct0 InvOiCe4 lnvo Dt 6mSS Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Not Amount 0 02102105 15.00 0.80 15.00 8L Distribution 8rnSo Amount Work Drder# AotCd Description 150'00-2172 15,00 REFUND-MAGIC MT __________________________________________________________________ GCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6,13 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) city of oaiamin NarK reD un, MD un:aqam rage V1 Payment History. Dank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #'s 148627 to 148909 Payment Type Check ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ V'end# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Dank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7051 WANKUEI MAO AP 148900 02102/05 18.00 Claim# General Description 65849 REFUND -SR TRIP (TIJUANA) PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 02/02/05 18.00 0.00 18.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 150 -00 -2169 18.00 REFUND- TIJUANA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Dank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7665 WENDY AVILA AP 148901 02/02/05 15.00 Claim# General Description 65852 REFUND -MAGIC NT POI Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 02/02/05 15.00 0.00 15.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 150 -00 -2172 15.00 REFUND ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Uend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Dank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7411 WILMA MARTIN DEL CAMPO AP 148902 02/02/05 18.00 Claim# General Description 65850 REFUND SR TRIP (TIJUANA) CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 02/02/05 18.00 0.00 18.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 150 -00 -2169 18.00 REFUND Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Dank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 5500 WOODCREST UNIFORMS AP 148903 02/02/05 111.78 Claim# General Description 65851 UNIFORM SUPPLIES PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount OE242560 01113105 25.83 0.00 25.83 OE242555 01/13/05 40.33 0.00 40.33 OE241406 01/05/04 45.62 0.00 45.62 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 100 -25 -5210 111.78 UNIFORM SUPPLIES CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) Qty of 0aIdwm Part Feb VU, ZM 88:34am Page 9Z Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/08/0000 to 09/99/9999 0pok/AC #'S 14807 to 140909 Payment Type Check ___________________________________________________________________ Vond# Vendor Name Remit0 Payee Bank Chook& Chk Date Omok Amount Soy 047 Y'TIRE SALES &P 148904 02/82/05 3,474.67 Cbimf General Description 658-54 TIRES PO#Stat Contracti Invo|ceV Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12034 0 00288 11/10100 425.32 0.00 425.32 100-72'5220 00436 11/19/04 236.30 0.00 236'30 0040 11/22/04 425.32 0.00 425,32 Vondl Vendor Nome 00740 12/08/04 2.387.73 0.00 2'387.73 SL Distribution 02/03/05 119'441.01 0muS Amount Work Drdor0 AotCJ 0mmriytiOo 130-58'5210 3'474.67 ( [A ^&NNUAL-R2004105^ VEHICLE TIRES P0 Liquidation Amount 130-50'5210 _____________________________________________________________________ 3,474.67 Vond# Vendor Name R00it# Payee Bank 0oCt# Chk Date Check Amount Soy 7666 YOLANU6 MIRANDA XP 148905 02/02/05 15.00 Cloim4 General Description 65853 REFUND-MA61C MT P0Stat Contract#lnvoice# ]nvc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount V 02/02/05 15.00 0.00 15.00 SL Distribution Smuo Amount Work Orden& A:tCd Description 150'00-2172 15.00 REFUND _____—_—___________-_—_____'__—__________--_-_____—_______'__—______ VmN# Vendor Name Ro0|t# Payee Bank Chook& Chk Date Check Amount 3oy 7611 IUKIGA'S FORKLIFT SERVICE AP 148906 02102/05 325,00 CJ3i00 General Description 65855 PALLET JACK NOI3tat Contract# lnvoicef Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12208 C 1001 12/11/04 325.00 0.00 325.00 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work Orden0 8CtCd Description 100-72'5220 525.00 i 0 PALLET JACK, 5500 L8 CAPACITY PO Liquidation Amount 100-72-5220 ____________________________________________________________________ 325.00 Vondl Vendor Nome Remitl Payee Bank Oeoki Chk Date 0wok Amount Sep 05 P.E.R.1 /JTN: HEALTH BENEFITS AP 148907 02/03/05 119'441.01 Claiml General Description POfStat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 02/03/05 119.441.01 11S,441.01 6L Distribution Gross Amount Work Ordenl kd(d Description 100-00+2204 90.28 FEB HEALTH PPM01-02 100-00'2804 111,971.53 FEB HEALTH PPI01-02 100'00'2211 6'841.92 FEB K[kLTK PP|01-02 100-81-5140 5117.20 FEB HEALTH PPI01-02 ______________________________________________________________________ GCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) (;/ty o| Uauwm mm roo vo, zm) m/xoam ,a0o m Payment History. Bank AP Payment Uotpn 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9909 (hook/ACH#'s 14807 to 148909 Payment Type Check _______________________________________________________________________________ y*ndf Vendor Note Rmm t0 Payee Bank Omok0 Qkk Date Check Amount Sep 186 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EMPLOYMENT 8EY AP 148908 0/03/05 16,1S8.29 Claimf General Description 65869 ST TAX DEPOSIT PP#03 P/E: 01/29/05 (IHCL: COUNCIL, SEMI-MO & BI-WKLY) PO# S{6t Co,tractf Immicof Invc 0t 8rnSS Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Not Amount 0 02/03/05 16'198.29 16.198.29 0L 0iotr\hUtiOo Gross Amount Work Ordorf AotCd D8oxr1ytiuD 100-00'2221 26.86 PP003 P/2: 01-29-05 CNCL.SEMl-MO'0l'WKLY 100'00-2221 205.68 PP403 P/E: 01-29-05 CN(l.SEMI'M8,8I-NKLY 100-00-2221 15.965.75 PPO03 P/[: 01-0'05 CN(l,SEMl-MO.0I-WKLY ____________________________________________________________________________ Vond# Vendor Komm Remit0 Payee Bank ChoCk0 Chk Date Check Amount So; 3866 VISION SERVICE PLAN (CA) AP 148989 02/03/05 4.724.08 Claim# 0nnoml Description 65868 JAN PREMIUM PPA 25-26 COBRA-SANCHEZ A/3001160610001 PO# Stat ContraotV Imoiuo& Iovo 0t Gmau Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 02/03/05 4.724.08 4'724.08 8L Distribution SrOuo 8mmUot Work Order0 kotCd Description 100-00-2320 4.724.08 JAN PREU PP025-26 C00RA'SANCHEZ --'--'-''—'--'--'—'------'--'---'—'---'----'----------------------'-----'''--'--'------'----'--'—'----- GCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) City of Baldwin Park Feb N], 200 08:34am Page S4 Payment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/9919099 Check/&HU'n 14807 to 14]9(0 Payment Typo Check __________________________________________________________________ Paid Checks: Pages purposely omitted: Non—issued "VOID'-" checks: Check Count 27S 12 �8 70 7% 76 7& 148656 � " � ° , � Chook Total 606,196.51 I48683 PQ Liquidation Total 262,900.02 .0�8.82 - I48764 Backup Withholding Total 0.00 I48768 148793 Paid by ACH: 148815 ACH Count 0 148827 ACH Total 0,00 I48828 PO Liquidation Total 0,08 148870 . ' 06okuP Withholding Total 0.00 1-48627 Total Payments: Payment Count 273 Payment Total 606.196,51 PO Liquidation Total 252.908.82 Backup Withholding Total 0.00 Void Checks: Check Count 0 Check Total 0.00 PO Liquidation Total 0,00 Backup Withholding Total 0,00 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) CITY OF BALDWIN PARK TREASURER'S REPORT JANUARY 2005 City Council Agenda Feb 16 2005 Item No. 3 ESTIMATED INVESTMENT INTEREST PURCHASE MATURITY PAR CURRENT BOOK MARKET DESCRIPTION RATE DATE DATE VALUE PRINCIPAL VALUE VALUE Certificate of Deposit 2.663 01/24/2005 04/25/2005 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 Ahern Assessment District 8.50 03102/89 09/02/08 52,433.22 10,222.56 10,222.56 10,222.56 Improvement Bond Bonds Federal Home Loan Bank 2.701 12/02/04 12115105 500,000.00 497,710.00 497,710.00 497,710.00 2.270 12/20/04 12/20/06 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 Federal Home Loan Mort. 3.004 12102104 07/14/06 500,000.00 498,000.00 498,000.00 498,000.00 3.050 12/15/04 06115/06 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 2.890 12/15104 03/15/06 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 State of California Local Agency Investment Fund City 2.26 Varies Varies 4,848,370.96 4,848,370.96 4,848,370.96 4,848,370.96 Redevelopment Agency 2.26 Varies Varies 6,441,508.95 6,441,508.95 6,441,508.95 6,441,508.95 Housing Authority 2.26 Varies Varies 448,683.00 448,683.00 448,683.00 448,683.00 Fiscal Agent Mutual Funds Varies Varies Varies 2,070,023.41 2,070,023.41 2,070,023.41 2,070,023.41 $16,861,019.54 $ _16 814 518.88 $ 16,814,518.88 Total Investments $ 16,814,518.88 Cash City General Checking 1,173,758.40 City Miscellaneous Cash 73,152.91 Redevelopment Agency 534,422.69 Housing Authority 60,323.85 Financing Authority 77,627.52 Total Cash $ 1,919,285.37 Total Cash and Investments $18 733 ,804.25 Schedule of Cash and Investments includes all financial assets as included in the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. There were no investment transactions made for the month of January, except for deposits /withdrawals made with the Local Agency Investment Fund. Market value for the Federal National Mortgage Association was obtained from Bank of the West. Market values for other investments approximate cost. The weighted average maturity of the investment portfolio is 1.828% months. In compliance with the California Government Code Section 53646 et seq., I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the City's expenditure requirements for the next six months that all investments are in compliance to the City's Statement of Investment Policy. Prepared by: Susan Camp q - -- Herinle E. Apodaca Executive Secretary Interim Finance Director City Council Agenda Feb 16 2005 ® Item No. BALDWIN CITY OF BALDWIN PARK STAFF REPORT P I A R� K TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Sid Mousavi, Interim Chief Executive Officer DATE: February 16, 2005 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 1256 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF AND ADDING SECTION 93.12 TO CHAPTER 93 OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO FIREWORKS SALES AND PERMITS PURPOSE: This report requests that the City Council approve on second reading Ordinance No. 1256 amending the current fireworks ordinance to ensure compliance with the City's policies for the issuance of fireworks permits and the ways in which the funds are expended. BACKGROUND: At their meeting of February 2, 2005, the City Council, after a discussion and recommendation of minor changes, introduced Ordinance No. 1256 to ensure compliance with the City's fireworks sales permit policies. DISCUSSION: As a result of the Council's consensus, Ordinance No. 1256 has been revised to ensure that all fireworks stands in Baldwin Park are made of metal. This change is reflected in Section 6 of the Ordinance. Section 7 of the Ordinance reflects the City Council's direction that monies can be allocated or expended by October 31St of the year in which fireworks were sold. FISCAL IMPACT: There is not a fiscal impact associated with this Ordinance. However, Resolution No. 2005 -010 will generate an additional $2,800 annually to offset the cost of processing and reviewing the fireworks applications and year -end reports. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve on second reading, Ordinance No. 1256 entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF AND ADDING SECTION 93.12 TO CHAPTER 93 OF THE BALDWINPARK MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO FIREWORKS SALES AND PERMITS AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF AND ADDING SECTION 93.12 TO CHAPTER 93 OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO FIREWORKS SALES AND PERMITS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 93.01 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code shall be amended by adding, in the correct alphabetical order, a definition of "applicant" and "fireworks bank account" to read as follows: APPLICANT. Shall be defined as the qualified organization (as defined below) or the qualified organizations, if a joint application is filed, upon whose behalf an application for a permit (as defined below) is filed. Fireworks bank account. Shall mean an account at a financial institution within the city used solely for moneys related to the sale of safe and sane fireworks pursuant to a permit granted pursuant to this Chapter. SECTION 2. Section 93.02 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code shall be amended to read as follows: § 93.02 SALE OF SAFE AND SANE FIREWORKS. No person shall sell or offer to sell any safe and sane fireworks within the city (i) without first having obtained a valid permit issued pursuant to the terms of this subchapter and (ii) without complying with all state and local laws, rules and regulations and all the conditions of approval applicable to that permit. SECTION 3. Section 93.03 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code shall be amended to read as follows: (A) Applications for permits shall be accepted only from qualified organizations, and shall be in writing upon the form prescribed therefore by the Chief Executive Officer. A filing and processing fee as set by resolution of the City Council shall be paid at the time of filing the application. The application shall be submitted to the Business License Division on or before the first day of May of the calendar year for which a permit shall first be issued. The person named pursuant to subparagraph (3) of subsection (B) of this section 93.03, Ordinance No. 1256 Page 2 shall sign the application and certify, under penalty of perjury, it is accurate and complete. (B) The application shall contain the following information: (1) The exact location of the proposed stand, together with the written permission of the owner of the property if the property is not owned by the applicant; (2) The name and location of the principal place of business of the applicant (or applicants for joint applications), the names and addresses of the members thereof (including any minors; provided, that to assist with protection of individual privacy, to the extent permitted by law, personal identifying information contained in the application, including, but not limited to, home addresses, home /cell phone numbers and the names of minors, will not be disclosed to the public), the name and place of business of the safe and sane fireworks vendor the applicant proposes to use and whether that vendor has, within the immediately preceding five (5) years, been convicted of a violation of any laws or regulations related to safe and sane or dangerous fireworks; (3) The name of the person and an alternate to be responsible for filing all financial reports required by this Chapter. Each of those persons shall also be designated as the only individuals authorized to withdraw money from the applicant's applicable fireworks bank account; (4) A statement of the purposes for which the applicant is organized; (5) A copy of the California Secretary of State certificate approving the organization and a copy of the last annual information return filed by the organization or other similar proof of the validity of the organization to operate within California; (6) How and where the net proceeds from the sale of the fireworks are to be expended; (7) For joint applications, (i) a designation of the single qualified organization responsible for filing the reports required by Section 93.12, (ii) the written agreement between the joint applicants regarding the joint application (iii) a designation as to which of the joint applicants shall be the primary applicant and which shall be the secondary applicant; and (8) Such other information as may be required by the Chief Executive Officer. Ordinance No. 1256 Page 3 (C) No person shall file an application which knowingly contains false information. SECTION 4. Section 93.06 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code shall be amended to read as follows: § 93.06 ISSUANCE OF PERMITS. (A) All timely filed applications for a fireworks permit shall be reviewed by the Chief Executive Officer for the purpose of determining whether an applicant is qualified to hold a permit. An applicant qualifies for a fireworks permit if the following criteria are satisfied: (1) The application contains all the information required by the provisions of this subchapter; (2) The applicant is a qualified organization, as defined in this subchapter; (3) The applicant will conduct all operations in accordance with all applicable laws; (4) The safe and sane fireworks vendor proposed to be used by the applicant has not, within the immediately preceding five (5) years, been convicted of a violation of any laws or regulations related to safe and sane or dangerous fireworks; and (5) At least 50% of the net proceeds from the sale of fireworks will be expended in the city on a program or programs consistent with the veteran, patriotic, religious, civic betterment or charitable purpose for which the applicant is organized; and (B) The City Council, by resolution, shall establish the policy and procedure for the issuance of permits, to qualified applicants, for the sale of fire- works. Such policy and procedure shall be implemented by the Chief Executive Officer. (C) In the absence of an appeal filed as prescribed in this subchapter, the determination of the Chief Executive Officer with reference to the qualification of the applicants and the issuance of the fireworks permits shall be final and conclusive. SECTION 5. Subsection (1) of Section 93.10 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code shall be amended to read as follows: Ordinance No. 1256 Page 4 (1) Deposits required. To ensure compliance with subsections (G) and (H) of this Section and Section 93.12, prior to issuance of any permit, the applicant shall deposit a cashier's check or cash in the amount of Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) (the "Deposit") with the Chief Executive Officer or her/his designee. No earlier than August 31 of the calendar year for which the permit is applicable, the Deposit shall be returned to the applicant; provided, that the Chief Executive Officer has reasonably determined the applicant has complied with all the terms of the permit and this Code. SECTION 6. Subsection (A) of Section 93.11 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code shall be amended by adding to the end of that subsection the following: provided, that the stand shall be constructed of metal". SECTION 7. Section 93.12 is hereby added to the Baldwin Park Municipal Code to read as follows: § 93.12 REPORTING OF REVENUES AND EXPENSES. (A) No later than August 6 of the year for which the permit is applicable, the applicant shall file with the Business License Division a written report ("Sale End Report"), which identifies the revenues and expenses relating to the sale of fireworks conducted during that year and a description of how the applicant intends to spend the revenues remaining after deduction of expenses (the "net proceeds"). Proof the proposed expenditure of the net proceeds has been officially approved by the applicant shall be submitted with the Sale End Report and could be shown by official minutes of the applicant. (B) No later than October 31 of the year in which the Sale End Report, was required to be filed, the applicant shall file, with the Business License Division, a written report showing proof the net proceeds have actually been expended or allocated and of how the net proceeds identified in the applicant's most recent Sale End Report were actually expended, with proof the expenditure(s) were officially approved by the applicant, which could be shown by official minutes of the applicant. (C) If the applicant fails to comply with Subsection (A) of this Section, then the Chief Executive Officer shall retain Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($250.00) of the Deposit. (D) If the applicant fails to comply with Subsection (B) of this Section, then the Chief Executive Officer shall assess a fine of Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($250.00) on the applicant. The applicant will not be permitted to apply for another permit or use a permit whose term has not yet expired unless and until that fine is paid in full. The fine may be collected through whatever legal and equitable means are available, including, but not limited to, rescinding a permit, Ordinance No. 1256 Page 5 or requesting equitable relief to prevent the applicant from using a permit, whose term may not yet have expired. (E) The person named pursuant to subparagraph (3) of subsection (B) of section 93.03, shall sign all reports required by this section and certify, under penalty of perjury, each is accurate and complete. SECTION 8. Sections 93.04 and 93.07 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code shall be amended so that the title "Chief Executive Officer" shall replace the titles "City Manager' and "City Executive Officer," whenever either of those latter two titles appears in those sections. SECTION 9. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance, and the City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be posted or published as prescribed by law. APPROVED and ADOPTED this, , day of 200 Manuel Lozano Mayor Ordinance No. 1256 Page 6 ATTEST: M 61g $1 ff W X01 Na WA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ss. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK 1, ROSEMARY M. RAMIREZ, Chief Deputy City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was regularly introduced for first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on February 2, 2005. That thereafter said Ordinance was duly approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on February 16, 2005 by the following vote: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ROSEMARY M. RAMIREZ, CIVIC CHIEF DEPUTY CITY CLERK City Council Agenda Feb 16 2005 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Jack Wong, Community Delul,el e Director DATE: February 16, 2005 SUBJECT: Adopt on second reading, Ordinance No. 1251, an ordinance approving a change of zone on property located at 3773-3779 Bresee Street, Location: 3773-3779 Bresee Street; Case Number Z- 541; Applicant: Todd Bowden, representing Bowden Development. Staff requests the City Council, adopt on second reading, Ordinance 1251, approving a zone change on the property located at 3773-3779 Bresee Street. laiTel"I"i • At the City Council meeting on February 2, 2005, Ordinance No. 1251 was introduced for first reading, read by title only and further reading was waived thereof. It is now appropriate to adopt the ordinance on second reading. Once adopted, the subject ordinance will take effect 30 days from the date of adoption. ATTACHMENTS * Ordinance 1251 Report Prepared by: Amy L. Harbin, Principal Planner C:\Amy\AMY\W0RD\Reports\Counci1 Reports\Z-541 2nd reading.doc AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK APPROVING A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM RG TO RG(PD) ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3773-3779 BRESEE STREET (APPLICANT: BOWDEN DEVELOPMENT; CASE NUMBER Z-541). THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby find, determine and declare as follows: a) That the owner of certain real property filed an application for a change of zone from RG, Residential Garden to RG(PD), Residential Garden Planned Development on real property located at 3773-3779 Bresee Street, described more particularly in the said application which is on file in the office of the Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City; and b) That pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Planning and Zoning Law (Sections 658000 et seq. Of the Government Code of the State of California) studies were commenced for the purposes of amending the Zoning Map of the City of Baldwin Park; and c) That a duly noticed public hearing was held upon said matter by the Planning Commission, and based upon the evidence presented, it was determined that the public necessity, convenience, and general welfare warranted that it recommend approval of the reclassification to RG(PD); and d) That the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said matter and based upon the evidence presented and each member of the Council being familiar with the site, it was determined that the public interest, necessity, convenience and general welfare warrant the approval of the Planning Commission recommendation and approval of the change in zone classification, herein described from RG to RG(PD). SECTION 2. That notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 153.630- 153.646 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code, the Zoning Classification of the property be and is hereby reclassified from the RG zone to the RG(PD) zone. SECTION 3. That the City Council at the time of the public hearing on the above matter reviewed and considered the proposed Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact, and comments relating thereto. That the City Council, based Ordinance 1251 Page 2 on its public review, does hereby approve the proposed Negative Declaration, since there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant impact upon the environment. SECTION 4. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause a copy of the same to be published in a manner prescribed by law, and shall forward a copy of the same to the Secretary of the Planning Commission. The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall file the Notice of Determination and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact. PASSED AND APPROVED ON THE 2nd day of February 2005 MANUEL LOZANO, MAYOR ATTEST: ROSEMARY M. RAMIREZ, CMC CHIEF DEPUTY CITY CLERK C:\Amy\AMY\WORD\ResolutionsOrdinances\CounciI Ordinances\Z-541.doc Ordinance 1251 Page 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ss: CITY OF BALDWIN PARK 1, ROSEMARY M. RAMIREZ, Chief Deputy City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was regularly introduced and placed upon it's first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on February 2, 2005. That there after said Ordinance 1251 was duly approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on February 16, 2005 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBER: NOES: COUNCILMEMBER: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBER: ROSEMARY M. RAMIREZ, CIVIC CHIEF DEPUTY CITY CLERK C:\Amy\AMY\WORD\ResolutionsOrdinances\CounciI Ordinances\Z-541.doc City Council Agenda Feb 16 2005 PURPOSE This report requests that the City Council reject the claims filed against the City by claimants Maria Garcia Martinez (11.04.04), and Jean-Pierre Modena (1.10.05). BACKGROUND In order for the statute of limitations to begin on subject claims, it is necessary for the City Council to reject the claims by order of a motion and that the claimants be sent written notification of said action. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council reject the above referenced claims and direct staff to send the appropriate notices of rejection to claimants. Report prepared by: Michelle Cardona, Administrative Clerk 11 City Council Agenda Feb 16 2005 Fm7Ez.T---T*L;q—= This report requests that the City Council authorize the formation of the Cragmont Street Improvement Assessment District 2005-01 by adopting Resolution 2005-012. 1-21.1m,"I"I Cragmont Street is located east of Heintz Street and is an unimproved private residential street. The pavement is in poor condition and does not meet the City standard. There are no curb and gutter. Eighty percent (80%) of the property owners who reside within the project area on Cragmont Street have signed a petition requesting that the City initiate an assessment district (a copy of the petition is attached). An assessment district would allow the City to construct street improvements. Normally, the property owners should bear the entire cost for the improvements, but in an effort to make it less burdensome for the property owners, the City is sharing the cost with the property owners. This project is part of the Capital Improvement Projects for FY 2004-2005. Advanced Applied Engineering is working on the design of the street and specifications for this project. The property owners will share the cost for construction of these improvements under the Assessment District. Gas Tax funds in the amount of $60,000 have been set aside for the City's share. It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Waive further reading, read by title only and adopt Resolution No. 2005 -012 entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS IN PROPOSED CRAGMONT STREET, ASSESSMENT NO. 2005 -01." REPORT PREPARED BY Arjan Idnani Assistant Director of Public Works SN:ai:an Attachment: Resolution No. 2005 -012 Petition for the Assessment District It is recommended that the City Council 1. Authorize the formation of Cragmont Street Improvement Assessment District 2005 -01; and 2. Adopt the attached Resolution 2005 -012 and direct staff to prepare an Engineer's report. REPORT PREPARED BY Arjan Idnani Assistant Director of Public Works SN:ai:an Attachment: Resolution No. 2005 -012 Petition for the Assessment District RESOLUTION NO. 2005-012 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS IN PROPOSED CRAGMONT STREET, ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2005-01 WHEREAS, in accordance with the Provisions of Section 2804 of the California Streets and Highways Code, the owners of more than 60 percent in area of the property subject to assessment for the proposed collection of fees for certain improvements, hereinafter described, have signed and filed with the Clerk of the City Council a written Petition for the construction of Cragmont Street Improvements in proceedings to be taken by the City Council, pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, and for the issuance of bonds in the proceedings under the Improvement Act of 1911 or the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 and by the Petition waived all proceedings required by the Provisions of Division 4 of said Streets and Highways Code (being the Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931, Streets and Highways Code Sections 2800-3012); and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park appoints the City Engineer to work to do and perform all engineering work necessary in and for the proceedings, including the description and improvements to be constructed, estimate of costs and assessment; and WHEREAS, the public interest and convenience requires the construction of said improvements; and M 0 a a Me] I 0A C &11104 1 SX91 M04 101 : I M&INT11 M a 01 a SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and the City Council so finds and determines. SECTION 2. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the Petition has been signed by the owners of more than 60 percent in the area of the property subject to assessment for the proposed fee collections hereinafter described and hereby grants the Petition and hereby determines that the situation described in Clause 3 of Section 2804 of the Streets and Highways Code exists and that the Majority Protest Act of 1931 shall not apply to the proceedings hereinafter provided for. SECTION 3. The public interest and convenience require the construction of the improvements hereinafter described. Resolution No. 2005-012 Page 2 SECTION 4. It is the intention of the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park to order the work, acquisitions and improvements to be made for an assessment district (hereinafter provided for) designated Assessment District No. 2005-01, the exterior boundaries of which are hereinafter specified and described in Section 5 hereof, the work, acquisitions and improvements being as set forth on Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Except as in this resolution otherwise specifically provided all the work and improvements shall be made and done pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913. SECTION 5. The City Council hereby declares that the territory within the boundaries hereinafter specified and described is the district to be benefited by the work, acquisitions and improvements is hereby made chargeable upon the district are hereby specified and described to be as shown on that certain map now on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, entitled "Proposed Boundaries Assessment District, City of Baldwin Park", which map indicates by a boundary line the extent of the territory included in the proposed district and shall govern for all details as to the extent of the assessment district. On the original and copy of the map of such assessment district on file in the Clerk's office, the Clerk shall endorse the certificate evidencing the date and adoption of the resolution. The Clerk shall file the original of such map in her office and, within fifteen (15) days after the adoption of the formation and extent of the assessment district, the Clerk shall file a copy of such map so endorsed in the records of the County Recorder, County of Los Angeles, State of California. SECTION 6. All public streets, alleys, easements and ways, and all publicly owned property in the assessment district in use in the performance of a public function shall be omitted from the assessment hereafter to be made to pay the cost and expense of the acquisitions. SECTION 7. Notice is hereby given that serial bonds to represent unpaid assessments, and which bear interest at a fixed or variable interest rate of not-to- exceed eight (8%) per annum, or such higher maximum interest rate as may be provided in the resolution of issuance, will be issued hereunder in the manner provided in either Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code (Improvement Act of 1911) or in Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Code (improvement Bond Act of 1915) and the last installment of such bonds shall mature in not-to-exceed 39 years from the second of September next succeeding 12 months from their date. The alternate procedure for collecting assessments and advance retirement of bonds as set forth in Part 11.1 of Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Code shall apply herein. Pursuant to Section 8650.1 of said Code, the City Council may determine to issue said bonds so that other than an equal annual proportion of the principal amount shall mature each year. SECTION 8. The City Council further hereby declares that it is its intention to covenant that, upon default of any assessment payment due it will cause foreclosure proceedings to be brought within 150 days of such default, as permitted by Section 8830 (b) of the Streets and Highways Code. Resolution No. 2005-012 Page 3 SECTION 9. The City Council further declares that it is its intention to create a special reserve fund to provide for the purchase of tax delinquent property by the City and for other advances contemplated to be made by the City under Part 13 of Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Code, as permitted by Section 8880-8886 of the Streets and Highways Code. SECTION 10. The City Council hereby finds and determines that if the assessment proposed herein results in a surplus from the proceedings to be provided for in the proceedings hereafter taken pursuant to this resolution, after the improvements are acquired, the surplus shall be applied to call debt or as a credit on the assessment, unless the City Council hereafter otherwise provides by resolution, all in accordance with the provisions of Sections 10427 to 10427.2, inclusive, of the Streets and Highways Code. SECTION 11. Whenever, in the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 or in the Improvement Bond Act of 1915, a notice, resolution, order or other matter relative to said proceedings for the work, acquisitions and improvements in said assessment district is required to be published, the City Clerk is hereby ordered to publish such notice, resolution or other matter in the bulletin which is hereby selected by the City Council for that purpose. SECTION 12. The City Council hereby refers the proposed acquisitions and improvements to the Engineer of Work, and hereby directs the Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk a report in writing containing the matters specified in Section 10204 of the Streets and Highways Code. SECTION 13. Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 8769, this Council hereby determines that the City will not obligate itself to advance available funds from the City treasury to cure any deficiency which may occur in the bond redemption fund; provided, however, this determination shall not prevent the City from, in its sole discretion, advancing funds for such purpose as otherwise provided in the Improvement Bond Act of 1915. SECTION 14. The bonds to be issued pursuant hereto under the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 may be refunded pursuant to the Refunding Act of 1984 at the maximum interest rate and term permitted by law and any reassessment for refunding shall be done on a pro rata basis. SECTION 15. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Resolution No. 2005-012 Page 4 APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of February, 2005. Manuel Lozano Mayor rA V . &M*jfi to] [$MA i t [to] L i" j COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES f ss: CITY OF BALDWIN PARK 1, Rosemary M. Ramirez, Chief Deputy City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, hereby certify that Resolution No. 2005-012 was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held February 16, 2005, by the following vote: I PJ CO' RCILITIEITIBERS,� NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE WA 4 " I M91 4 M PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS AND WAIVER OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF DIVISION 4 OF THE STREETS AND CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA The undersigned, are the owners of more than sixty (60%) of the area of real property in the City of Baldwin 'Park, generally located along properties along, 9 31 as is more particularly shown on that certain map attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference marked Exhibit "A". Said properties will be subject to assessments for the improvements hereinafter requested, and said,owners'do hereby. request the institution of proceeding I s pursuant to Chapter 27 -of th . e Improvement Act of 1911 (Sections 10000 et. seq. of the Streets and Highway Code) for the purpose of constructing public utilities and all appurtenances thereto, said improvements to include the acquisition acquisition of all necessary rights-of-way so as to facilitate the construction of the said improvements. Each of the signatories hereto expressly waive the proceedings required, and all limitations, under the "Special Assessment I , nvestigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931" (Sections Z000 et seq. of the Streets and Higfiways Code), This Petition may be signed in counterpart and shall constitute one Petitions and Waiver, and may be consolidated with similar Petitions and Waivers for the improvements and rights-of-way herein mentioned. y PETITIONER'S STREET ADDRESS OR OTIIER NAME OF PETITIONER SIGNATURE DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AND RESIDENT ADDRESS PROPOSED FOR INCLUSION (Please print 01 type) IN THE PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSMENT, DISTRICT C411 t -t Pfte-K- oraqi cal 6't tu PAY WCUIS CYCJ�Mon,� -jz�cjj tj w j vi pn (�fi 7U 6o 7T -2�� Z' --------- - . OUN Y L___. sT. - BORFL ST. ca Y f� I� � yr D Z' ulty council Agenda Feb 16 2005 Fdlf.q 093 ff � This report requests that the City Council award a contract for the design of the restoration and expansion of the existing Senior Center to Pickard Architects in the amount of $86,300. On November 22, 2004, the Engineering Division mailed Requests for Proposals for the design of the restoration and expansion of the existing Senior Center to twenty consultants. On December 21, 2004, the Engineering Division received five (5) proposals. On January 18, 2005, all five consultants were interviewed by a panel of six members (two department heads and four senior staff members). The panel performed a careful and thorough review and evaluation of each of the five presentations to determine the most qualified and experienced firm in this type of work. The panel also looked at the qualifications and similar design experience, the key personnel who would be assigned to the project and the firm itself. Each firm gave a good presentation and it was obvious that all of the firms had more than adequate experience in designing senior centers. The panel selected Pickard Architects for their in depth presentation and for offering their services at a very reasonable cost. Staff also checked their references and found them to be good. Cost comparison of all the other consultants is attached as Exhibit "C". The cost of design services for the above project is $86,300. Proceeds from the Community Center bond refinancing will be used for this project. There is no impact on the General Fund. It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Award a design contract for the restoration and expansion of the existing senior center to Pickard Architects in the amount of $86,300; and 2. Authorize the Mayor to execute the attached agreement; and 3. Authorize the Director of Public Works to execute any necessary change order in an amount not to exceed ten percent (10 %) of the original contract amount. 4. Authorize the Finance Director to appropriate $94,930, ($86,300 + 10 %) from the Community Center bond proceeds. SN :an Attachments: Agreement Proposal for Professional Design Services Exhibit "B" Scope of Services - Exhibit "A" Cost comparison — Exhibit "C" I'7 CITY •.. BALDWIN PARK SENIOR EXPANSION °. • r CONSULTANTS CONSULTANT BASE BID Dante G. Aguilos, AIA, Architects and Associates $114,000 Garo V. Minassian, Architect, Inc. 96,000 Construction Fees: 15% Osborn Architecture 132,000 11 % of the final actual cost of construction (current fee is based on the $1.2 budget as provided on the RFP Pickard Architects 86,300 The Neiman Group Hourly Rate See attachment A B 'k 0 Anox/Tccro EXHIBIT "A" January 31, 2005 Mr. ShafiouoN i Director ufPublic Works City of Baldwin Park 14483 East Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, CA 91706 Re: Julie McNeil Senior Center Expansion and Improvement Morgan Park, City of Baldwin Park, CA Dear Mr. Naiyer: Per your request, the fees for the referenced project are: Professional Design Services 879900.00 Reimbursable Expenses $-G^4CK}lX} Total $86,300.00 Also per you request, the following is an outline of the services to be provided for each phase of the project. Schematic Design • Design Concept of the Site and Floor Plans and one Alternate • Two Public Meetings. • Architect's Estimate uf Probable Construction Cost. • Owner shall provide all as-built drawings of the existing conditions/improvements • Landscape Design if required shall bn treated as Additional Services. • Drawings reflecting the design concept based on Public Hearings and Client input and unno\oUng of Site Plan, Floor P|an, Reflected Ceiling Plan and Exterior Elevations and Miscellaneous Interior Design Details. • One Public Hearing Meeting. • An updated Architect's Estimate nf probable Construction Cost. • Preliminary Structural, Mechanical, Plumbing and Electrical Plans. • Interior Color Materials Board. • One Color Rendering of the Building Exterior and two color Interior Sketches. • Final Submission for Client Review and Approval. ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN ARCHITECTS David W. Pickard Jr., ALA cc David Pickard III, Esq..xm E. Fay Rippon, A[A pns South pomfe,Avenue Construction Documents Whiffief, CA 90602-2440 Tel. e2.94e.8821 • Construction Drawings consisting of Architectural, Structural, Maohanioa|. Plumbing and Fax sm»*s11w BedTioa| Disciplines. • Make correcionsaa needed based on the various Agencies Comments and ba ready to»�mp��mnom ' obtain Building Permits. E-mail mm@nickard.com • Technical Specifications. City shall provide Boiler Plate nout*rie|. • Submission to Client at80% completion. ` PICKARD Construction Administration • Attend a weekly meeting during Construction. • Respond to RFI's. • Process Contractor Submittals. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give us a call. cc: Jack Azantian, RA Cindy Lai t November 22, 2004 • 1111 . 1 0. IN] LIM Ki to] 0 _X'EQUEST FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROPOSAL AND QUALIFICATIONS To: Interested Consulting Firms From: Shafique Naiyer, Director of Public Works Re: Senior Center Expansion and Improvements Congratulations, your firm is among a group of consultants selected by the City of Baldwin Park to participate in a unique and innovative project. At this time the City of Baldwin Park requests the submittal of your firm's proposal no later than 5:00 p.m. on December 21, 2004 for the City's consideration. On the following pages we have outlined for you the detailed description of the existing building and its surroundings. The scope of your work is related to upgrade and expansion of this building and to comply with the American with Disabilities Act (ADA). We have also listed the items which your proposal should include. It is important that you include all the requested items. A panel selected by the City will rate each firm related to their experience and performance. The finalist will be invited to appear before this panel. The City would initiate the contract negotiation with the top firm selected by the panel. Please contact me at (626) 813-5251 if you have any questions regarding the RFP and the selection process. CITY OF BALDWIN PAkK,14403 EAST PACIFIC AVENUE•BALDWIN PARK, CA, 91706• (626)960-4011, FAX(626)962-262S i1111111111111111111W4 RifflLell 40 U-91IN10101 The existing building, type V 1 HR (wood trellises, decorative pre-cast concrete trim columns, exterior plaster walls, mission tile roofing, store front doors and windows) is located adjacent to the Community Center in Morgan Park. The size of the existing building is 4,664 square feet (Type B-2) and 3,136 square feet (Type A-3) making it a total of 7,800 square feet, for the entire building. In September 1995 the building was slightly remodeled. ffl•' • 9 �Ull A. The project consists of upgrade the existing Senior center to comply with American with Disabilities Act (ADA). The existing structure will be upgraded to include the following items: • Re-configure the front counter, staff offices and delete the sub station • In general add more rooms, offices to conduct additional classes/meetings. • Larger lobby area with wall big screen/plasma television. • Re-configure patio area for additional space and amenities. W SO a 1=0 4 M_ NO WTO 154 • Add a library (quiet room/board games). • Re-configure the front entrance. • Re-surface front door (slope) entry way adjacent to the amphitheater (it puddles when it rains). • Automatic sliding doors to both entrances. • Add a fire alarm (if needed) • Add a central paging system. • Additional storage space for supplies and equipment. 2 A. During the schematic design phase, the consultant will meet with Staff and attend at least three (3) public meetings to receive input from the public, Planning Commission, Park and Recreation Commission, Council members and City Staff. B. Consider possible design alternatives in response to public meetings and site consideration. C. Refine selected schematic design to meet all agencies' requirements including the Health Department and Fire Department. D. Obtain all necessary permits and licenses. Fees will be paid by the City. E. Get approval of final drawings and specifications from all related public agencies. F. During the construction phase, interpret plans and specifications, review and approve shop drawings and change orders. G. Visit the site at least once every week during construction. If more visits are required and requested by City Staff, they will be considered extra. H. Establish a good working relationship with Staff and work within the City's financial constraints. A. The Consultant shall prepare schematic plans for various options based on the input received (limited to a maximum of two options). B. Present schematic plans to the Planning Commission and the public for I review and review their input. C. Present preliminary drawings of the selected option to the Planning Commission, Park and Recreation Commission and the public for final review. D. The Consultant shall provide a cover sheet with the required standard construction notes and location map that must be approved by the City. E. The Consultant shall prepare plans, technical provisions and specifications for the project. A boiler plate for general requirements of the City of Baldwin Park shall be furnished by the City. 3 F. The Consultant shall prepare cost estimates and the schedule for this project. The work shall be completed within a maximum of one hundred and fifty (150) calendar days from the date of the official Notice to Proceed. Six sets of the proposal must be submitted on 8 Y2" x 11" paper. Elaborate bindings are not necessary. The proposal must contain the following information in the order listed below: A. Describe background of the firm. B. The firm's experience in the improvement and modernization of existing structures. Emphasis on any of those such as public buildings, city halls, senior, community or teen centers, etc. C. The firm's experience with successfully completed recreational public works projects. D. Provide a very brief description of up to 3 unique public works projects for which the firm has conducted extensive community meetings and a very brief outline of groups involved and your approach to successfully dealing with the community. E. Outline very briefly the architectural design team and provide evidence of the key members' special ability to deal with projects such as this. F. Project approach. G. Organizational chart. H. Provide a proposed sub-consultant list, your work history with them and a brief description of how you will be better able to respond to needed "onsite" problem solving situations during construction. I. Statement of Qualifications including the resumes of principal(s) and staff members who will be assigned to the project and recent experience pertinent to this project. I The Consultant's proposed work plan including a preliminary work schedule. M K. Identification of the individual who will be in charge of the project and his/her related experience. L. Indicate your firm's design and construction management fees and miscellaneous charges and submit them in a separate sealed envelope. M. A copy of a sample agreement is attached for your review. All requirements related to insurance must be met before the contract is awarded. N. For the purpose of establishing a fee schedule use $1.2 million as the estimated construction cost. FA t( THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 7 day of rei3agw.j c , by and between the City of Baldwin Park, ( "City "), and -etc p Agc,e4 crec—s, ( "Consultant "). In consideration of the following mutual covenants, provisions and agreements, and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, City and Consultant agree as follows: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES. Consultant shall perform all services reasonably necessary and required in order to complete the Project set forth in its proposal, which is attached hereto, marked, Exhibit "A ", and incorporated herein by this reference. 2. TIME FOR PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall perform the services above described !so 15-c ctC�t2. Time is of the essence in the performance of this D 11s contract. All services to be performed by Consultant shall be timely performed in accordance with a detailed Project schedule which shall be submitted by Consultant and approved by the City prior to commencement of any work by Consultant. 3. COMPENSATION. Consultant shall be compensated for the services rendered hereunder in accordance with the proposed fee schedule attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A ", and incorporated herein by this reference. Consultants' compensation shall not exceed } g a W.co . 4. STATUS OF CONSULTANT. For the purpose of this Agreement, Consultant shall be deemed, for all purposes, an independent Consultant. Consultant shall provide all necessary personnel, equipment and material, at its sole expense, in order to perform the services required of it pursuant to this Agreement. on 5. COMPLIANCE WITH LAW. Contract services shall be provided in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations of all governmental agencies that are in force at the time services are performed. Consultant shall be responsible for becoming aware of and staying abreast of all such laws and ensuring that all services provided hereunder conform with such laws. When applicable, Consultant shall not pay less than the prevailing wage and Consultant shall obtain the prevailing wage rates from the Director of Industrial Relations of the State of California directly, or through the City. 6. LIABILITY. Consultant shall indemnify, and hold harmless City, its officials, officers, and employees against any and all actions, claims, damages, liabilities, losses or expenses of whatsoever kind, name or nature, including legal costs and reasonable attorneys' fees, whether or not suit is actually filed, and any judgment rendered against City and/or its officials, officers, or employees that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm, or entity arising out of Consultants' negligent performance, or the negligent performance of its agents, employees, sub Consultants, or invitees, as well as, negligent acts or omissions of Consultant, it's agents, employees, sub Consultants or invitees, however, this indemnity clause shall not apply if there is concurrent passive or active negligence on the part of City, or its officials, officers, agents or employees. 7. INSURANCE. Consultant shall maintain insurance coverage in accordance with the following during the course of its performance hereunder: (A) Comprehensive General Liability Insurance (including premises and operations, contractual liability, personal injury and independent Consultants' liability) with the following minimum limits of liability: 7 (1) Personal or Bodily Injury -- $1,000,000, single limit, per occurrence; and (2) Property Damage -- $1,000,000, single limit, per occurrence; or (3) Combined single limits of $2,000,000. (B) Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insurance including as applicable own, hired and non-owned automobiles with the following minimum limits of liability: (1) Personal or Bodily Injury -- $1,000,000, single limit, per occurrence; and (2) Property Damage -- $1,000,000, single limit, per occurrence; or (3) Combined single limits of $2,000,000. (C) Professional Liability Insurance with annual aggregates of $1,000,000 or such other amount as may be approved in writing by the City. (D) Worker's Compensation Insurance that complies with the minimum statutory requirements of the State of California. (E) Prior to commencement of services hereunder, Consultant shall provide City with a certificate of Insurance reflecting the above, and an endorsement for each policy of insurance which shall provide: (1) the City, and its officials, officers, agents and employees are named as additional insured; N. (2) the coverage provided shall be primary as respects to City, its officials, officers, agents or employees; moreover, any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City or its officials, officers, agents or employees shall be in excess of Consultants' insurance and not contributed with it. (3) the insurer shall provide at least thirty (30) days prior written notice to City of cancellation or of any material change in coverage before such change or cancellation becomes effective. (F) With respect to Workers' Compensation Insurance, the insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against City and City personnel for losses arising from work performed by Consultant for City, and the insurer's agreement in this regard shall be reflected in the Workers' Compensation Insurance endorsement. 8. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. All of the documents required to be prepared pursuant hereto shall, upon the completion thereof, be deemed for all purposes to be the property of City. 9. NOTICES. Notices pursuant to this Agreement shall be given by personal service upon the person to be notified, or upon deposit of the same in the custody of the U.S. Postal Service, postage prepared, addressed as follows: (A) City of Baldwin Park Civic Center 14403 East Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, CA 91706 Attention: Shaft gue Naiver, Director of Public Works 9 (B) CONSULTANT ?%C-te-A� xzc,4k-rei 1- -+`� t5 5-;-c4TA. ?AIAITCe AVE- k-L,t+)TT1,F-z eA, CIO C- 0 -z 10. ENFORCEMENT. In the event any party institutes any action to enforce the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to it's court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the day first above written. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK By: Manuel Lozano Mayor ATTEST: C \fo—lagrec=nt - C-5.1=1 City Clerk 10 CONS TAN By: Ati iifitINIf,�1' Feb 16 2005 DATE: February 16, 2005 SUBJECT: Proposed Recognitions • the Mayor and City Council for the period February 16, 2005 to March 1, 2005 WE"M9 The purpose of this report is to seek approval of the City Council of requests for plaques, proclamations and certificates; and to recap approved emergency requests. As of February 16, 2005, the following request has been received for the period from February 16, 2005 to March 1, 2005. Requested By List of Honorees Time/Date/Place of Presentation Date Needed American Heart February 4, 2005 National Proclamation will be Proclamation Association Wear Red Day for Women; picked up by 2/17/05 February is American representative of 2/10/05 Heart Month American Heart Asn. Mayor Lozano San Gabriel Valley Tribune Proclamation will be Proclamation 50th Anniversary on March mailed to Tribune for 2/17/05 21, 2005 display in their lobby The following emergency requests for plaques and certificates were approved by the Interim Chief Executive Officer and have been ordered and/or prepared: Tirne/Date/Place of Needed RequestedBy List of Honorees Presentation '[ice' Mayor Lozano Helford Clinical Research 11:00 am, Sunday, Plaque Hospital February 13, 2005 2/10/05 City • Hope RECOMMENDATION ItiS recommended that the City Council approve the preparation and presentation Ofthe above plaque. Prepared By: Sharon Thompson, Executive Secretary mCEO 2 � City Council Agenda Feb 16 2005 F: a ".- a's R U This report provides City Council an update on storm damage to the building and other City facilities in recent storms. Before I describe the storm damage to the building and facilities, I would like to briefly describe the mechanics of storm runoff. Even though the method to calculate the quantities of storm runoff is quite complex, I would make an attempt here so that it can easily be understood. During the past 12 months, we have experienced very heavy storms which have caused some serious damage to city buildings and facilities. The City had to spend a substantial amount to repair them. Some have alleged that because roof gutters were not cleaned, that caused the flooding. We wish that it were that simple. The power of a storm can be tremendous as we have recently witnessed the massive damage in life and property in Southeast Asia. There are several factors which contribute to the volume of storm water and its movements. As the volume exceeds the norm, its movement turns into rapids causing damage. The bigger the volume of storm runoff, the bigger the damage that is caused to life and property. Below are the factors which contribute to storm runoff: 1. Frequency (n) — This factor relates to accumulation of volume of water related to time. As we know, some years it rains more than others and sometimes we have no rain for a long period of time. All these data is collected and compiled to produce rainfall intensity curves. Based on the rain data collected over the years for a particular area, we can determine whether it is a 10, 50 or 100 year storm. A 50 year storm means its probability of occurring is once every 50 years. Most storm drain systems are designed for 10 year storms and in some cases for 25 years like channels, etc. Because the cost becomes too prohibitive to provide protection for a 50 or 100 year storms, it means that even if there is a storm drain system in the area, a 50 or 100 year storm will cause some flooding. Now you imagine not having a storm drain system and being faced with a 50 or 100 year storm; the damage will be extensive. 2. Coefficient (C) - It is the ratio of storm runoff to the rainfall which is determined by the water retention quality of the ground. A landscaped area will absorb more water as compared to a paved area, thus reducing the quantity of water. 3. Intensity (1) — Quantity of rainfall is measured in inches related to time. Rainfall sometimes falls very heavy and other times it is sprinkling. This provides another way to measure the quantity of storm runoff related to time. 4. Area in Acres — Water flows downhill and can be calculated at different intervals. The runoff at a particular point takes into consideration all the areas upstream. In the calculation of storm runoff and storm drain facilities all these factors are calculated. When all these four factors are combined, it gives us volume of water moving with a certain speed. Please note that certain facilities are not designed for all these factors being considered at their peak. For example, the third floor of City Hall had never been flooded since the building was built. I MGM= City Hall: The east patio on the 3rd floor used to be open and has a four inch (4") high curb. Half of roof drainage and the rain falling on the patio begins accumulating as the volume increases because the curb is holding the runoff. There is an existing two inch (2") diameter grate which can discharge a small quantity of water. But because of its small size, it can easily get plugged. During the heavy rain which occurred last year, water got trapped up to four inches (4") and forced itself to the third floor and flooded most of the third floor causing extensive damage to the floor and walls. Water from the third floor seeped through to the second floor causing some damage on the second floor. Even in the best of conditions the rate at which the water was accumulating and had no outlet to get out, except through the doors to the third floor which flooded the third floor up to four inches (4") deep. After the rain we examined the situation and took immediate steps to insure no future flooding. We punched four — 4" diameter holes in the concrete curb at the third floor patio which allowed water to get out at a much faster rate resulting in increase of outlet capacity, 64 times greater than the existing 2" diameter grate. Later we covered the patio so now almost no water can accumulate at this location. We are confident that no future storm damage is anticipated. Family Center: Again the slabs around the building slope towards the building and there are boundary walls around it. During rain, the accumulated water has no place to go but towards the building. Once the water reached more than one half inch deep (1/2"), it began entering the building through the doors During the last heavy rain large amounts of water got in the building causing heavy damage to the floor and walls. To resolve the drainage problem, we removed the existing slabs from two sides of the building, and re-graded it sloping away from the building. Then we intercepted this water with a series of catch basins and carried it in a pipe outlet to the parking lot. We also punched some additional holes in the boundary walls so that if there is any surface runoff it can get out through these holes. Senior Center: Here again the grounds and floors outside the building in many areas slope towards the building. This allows water to go through the walls and do some damage to the walls and floors. We have not been able to find a proper solution yet, except patch work. Again it will require extensive removal of slabs in all areas which are sloping towards the building, then re-grading it so that it slopes away from the building and then paving it. Here we do not want to spent a sizeable amount in repairs as we are in the process of restoration and expansion of this building. Whenever a development or construction of a building takes place, drainage is the most critical item to pay attention to. To resolve a poor drainage condition is a very difficult task and shall be handled at the development stage. It is important not to create a situation in the building like the curb in the patio area on the third floor with no opening for water to get out. No thought was given to it. Also, it is very important to grade the ground sloping away from the building, not sloping towards the building as is the case in the Family Center and the Senior Center. These are very simple drainage concepts and must be followed in any future design. It appears when the City facilities were constructed, very little attention was paid to drainage. The steps we have taken for solving flooding conditions for the City Hall or Family Center will avoid any water retention which in turn will eliminate any flooding. During the restoration and expansion of the Senior Center, we will take care of all the drainage problems as part of the project. FISCAL IMPACT The contractor was paid approximately $205,000 for storm damage repairs to the City Hall. Most of it was covered by insurance. Repairing the storm damage at the Family Center we have already spent a $75,000 in drying and drainage of the facility. $150,000 is expected to be spent in reconstruction of walls and floor. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council receive this report, review and file it City Council Agenda Feb 16 2005 BALDWIN P I A - R • K TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Sid Mousavi, Interim Chief Executive Officer,�� DATE: February 16, 2005 mnl wMar-Tim EM= The purpose of this report is for the City Council to approve the agreement with RealTime Communications for the installation and maintenance of a Siemens telephone system for all City facilities. During last year's goal setting and budgeting processes, the City Council indicated their desire to improve the telephone communications systems throughout the City. As a result of this direction, a committee of staff members was convened to identify the specific communications needs for all City facilities and departments. Once that list was compiled, a Request for Proposals (RFP) specifying the City's needs was sent to eight vendors who were interviewed by the Committee. The vendors were Mitel Communications; Nortel Networks; Shoreline; NEC; Comdial; Avaya; Cisco and RealTime Communications/Siemen. At the first interviews, committee staff members voiced their concerns and improvement 'wish list' to the vendors. The second interview was for the vendors to present their solutions to committee staff members. Then the committee members selected the top three vendors who met with the Executive Team and a final selection was made. The three finalists were NEC ($153,883.88), Nortel Networks ($151,715.51), and RealTime Communications/Siemens ($137,570.11). The identified telephone needs were: 1. One system for all City facilities 2. Connectivity between facilities 3. Increased lines for facilities 4. Uniform operation of phone systems for all facilities 5. Lower operations and capital costs 6. More efficient telephone operations and traffic flow The top three finalists were interviewed by the Executive Team and E-Team unanimously recommended RealTime Communications/Siemens team. RealTime Communications offering Siemens telephone equipment was found to best meet the City's need. After their selection the CEO, Finance Director and IT Support met with RealTime/Siemens and negotiated their price to be $120,000. The total cost of the system is $120,000. The proposed system provides the City with the capabilities identified as well as enhancing the overall phone operations. As a part of the agreement, the City will be provided with digital phones and the opportunity to make phone calls and fax over data lines, which can reduce long distance calling costs. This phone system will also provide the City with a variety of calling features including centralized voice mail, call accounting, centralized maintenance, desktop faxing, 911 interface, multiple extension lines and information hotlines. Based on the system that is being proposed by RealTime Communications/Siemens, the City anticipates annual call savings of approximately $20,690. These savings are achieved by the fact that all facilities will be on the system eliminating the local telephone service costs of calling to each facility. In addition, with the assistance of RealTime, the City will be changing its service provider so that local calls are charged at a reduced rate and only actual phone time is charged. The City's current provider charges for a minute of service even if the call only extends 10 seconds into that minute. In addition, the $120,000 cost for the system includes an 18-month warranty for parts and labor. This will save the current maintenance costs of approximately $16,000 for the first year and $10,000 for the second year the phones are in service. Staff also anticipates lower overall maintenance costs for the life of the system resulting in $8,000 of savings in the third and fourth year the phones are in service. The total anticipated savings for the first four years with the new phones is $124,761. Thereby offsetting the cost of the system. rg16-101--1 In order to limit the impact on the City's budget, staff has negotiated a lease with the option to purchase agreement with RealTime Communications/Siemens to make payments on the phones in three years. Therefore, the impact to the Information Services Fund for this Fiscal Year will be $40,000. Another $40,000 will be due at the start of Fiscal Year 2005-06 in July and another $40,000 due at the start of Fiscal Year 2006-07 in July 2006. 2 It is recommended that the City Council approve the agreement with RealTime Communications/Siemens and authorize staff to appropriate $16,000 of the unused maintenance charges, $10,000 of estimated communication savings and the remaining $14,000 from unallocated Information Services Fund for a new City telephone system. M01191901W1111*11 A MY01 I 1 0 1.-1 Oil N 0 1 A 1 -6 ki kj This Agreement for Lease ("Agreement") is made and entered into , 2005, by and between the City of Baldwin Park ("City") and B.C., Inc., a California corporation, doing business as RealTime Communications ("Contractor") for the provision of telephone equipment and services. This Agreement is made and entered into with respect to the following facts: a. The City is desirous of leasing telephone equipment, with an option to purchase, and obtaining the services of a qualified consultant to provide project management, software design and programming, installation, cutover, telco testing and user training relating to such equipment. b. Contractor has submitted a proposal to provide such equipment and services which is attached hereto as Attachment A and incorporated herein by this reference. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of performance by the parties of the covenants and conditions herein contained, the parties do hereby agree as follows: Contractor shall lease to City and City agrees to lease from Contractor the equipment specified in Attachment A (the "Equipment"). The period of said lease shall from the date of installation on City property until July 1, 2006. Contractor hereby grants City the option to purchase the Equipment for the sum of One Dollar. City shall exercise said option by providing Contractor said sum together with the lease payment due on July 1, 2006. Contractor agrees to provide City with all labor and services necessary to provide project management, software design and programming, installation, cutover, and telco testing necessary to render the Equipment usable for the City's purposes as have previously been explained to Contractor. Such work shall be completed no later than May 30, 2005. Contractor further agrees to provide user training in the amounts specified in Attachment A for such persons as are designated by City. Such training shall occur at one or more of the City properties identified in Attachment A, as designated by City. This Agreement shall commence on March 1, 2005, and shall expire on July 1, 2006. Contractor shall, at all times, faithfully, competently and, and to the best of its ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described in Attachment "A." Contractor hereby agrees that all work products produced and provided by Contractor during and upon completion of this Agreement shall be the sole property of the City and ownership of said work product shall be retained by the City. Contractor further agrees that upon City's exercise of the option to purchase the Equipment, the Equipment shall become the sole property of the City. Contractor hereby warrants that the Equipment shall perform as represented to City for a period of not less than eighteen (18) months following the date of cutover. Contractor shall provide at its sole cost and expense any and all parts and labor required during such period, provided, however, that any work necessitated by moves, additions or changes to the Equipment shall not be included within this warranty. Contractor agrees to provide any additional work requested by City which is not covered by the warranty granted in this Section V11 on a time and material basis. Time shall be charged at the following rates: Monday through Friday (non-holiday), 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., $100.00 for the first hour and $80.00 for each additional hour; all other times, $120.00 for the first hour and $100.00 for each additional hour. Except for such additional work as requested by City, Contractor shall render no extra services beyond the scope of services described under this Agreement unless such extra services first shall have been duly authorized in writing by the Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"). Additional services shall be subject to terms agreed to in writing by the City and Contractor. City agrees to pay Contractor in the amounts and at the times set forth in Attachment "A." SECTION IX — NON-LIABILITY • OFFICIALS, AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY No official, employee or agent of the City shall be personally liable to Contractor in the event of any default or breach by the City, or for any amount that may become due to Contractor. 2 Contractor is and shall, at all times, remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. Neither the City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Contractor except as expressly set forth in this Agreement. Contractor shall not at any time or in any fashion represent that Contractor is in any manner an officer, employee or agent, of the City. No employee benefits shall be available to Contractor in connection with performance of this Agreement. Except as provided in this agreement, City shall not pay salary, wages or other compensation to Contractor for performance hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation to Contractor for injury or sickness arising out of performance services hereunder. Also, City does not provide Workers' Compensation to Contractor. Contractor shall at all times observe and comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, codes and regulations of the federal, state and local governments including, but not limited to, the Baldwin Park Municipal Code. The City, and its appointed or elected officers, employees or agents shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure to Contractor to comply with this section. Contractor agrees to and shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless, the City, its elected and appointed boards, officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, lawsuits defense costs, civil penalties, expenses, causes of action and judgments at law or in equity or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its elected and appointed boards, officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be imposed on them for injury or deaths of persons or damage to property arising out of Contractor's negligent or wrongful act or omission under this Agreement. This section does not apply to liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City. Prior to the beginning of and throughout the duration of this Agreement, Contractor shall maintain insurance in the amounts and of the type set forth below. Contractor may use existing coverage to comply with these requirements, provided that if existing coverage does not meet the requirements set forth herein, Contractor agrees to amend, supplement or endorse the existing coverage to do so. Contractor acknowledges that the insurance coverage and policy limits set forth in this section constitute the minimum amount of coverage required. Any insurance proceeds available to City in excess of the limits and coverage required in this Agreement and which is applicable to a given loss, will be available to City. 3 1. Commercial General Liability Insurance in an amount not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000). There shall be no cross-liability for claims or suits by one insured against another. 2. Business Auto Coverage in an amount not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per accident. If Consultant or Consultant's employees will use personal autos in any way on work under this Agreement, Consultant shall provide evidence of personal auto liability coverage for each such person. 3. Workers' Compensation on a state-approved form providing statutory benefits as required by law. • This Agreement contains the entire understanding between City and Contractor. Any prior agreements, promises, negotiations, or representation not expressly set forth herein are of no force or effect. Subsequent modifications to this Agreement shall be effective only if in writing and signed by each party. If any term, condition or covenant of this Agreement is held by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall be valid and binding. Waiver by any party hereto of Agreement shall not constitute the covenant hereof. F� any term, condition, or covenant of this waiver of any other term, condition or This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the successors of each of the parties hereto. This Agreement shall be interpreted and construed according to the laws of the State of California and venue shall be in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. If litigation is reasonably required to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to an award of reasonable attorney's fees in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitle. 4 SECTION XVIII — NOTICE All notices shall be personally delivered or mailed to the addresses listed below: CONTRACTOR RealTime Communications 5450 Katella Ave., Suite 101 Los Alamitos, CA 90720 Attn: Karin S. Poole CITY: City of Baldwin Park 14403 East Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, CA. 91706 SECTION XIX — ASSIGNMENT Neither party may assign any right or obligation under this Agreement without the express written approval of the other party. IN WITNESSETH WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first written above. City of Baldwin Park RealTime Communications By: Sid Mousavi Its. Interim Chief Executive Officer Approved as to Form: HOW= 5 EXHIBIT A [ATTACH PROPOSAL] 6 Voh-20 and CoMa Ketwm* Specfallats February 7, 2005 The following Schedule A provides parts and pro services lists and costs to deploy this solution. By signing this document you agree to select RealTime Communications as your Communications Solution partner and to the payment terms described below. Total price, including material, Taxes, End User Training and Pro Services is: $ 120,000 $40,000 Down Payment Due with Initial Signed Contract and Purchase Order by March 1, 2005 $40,000 Due July 1, 2005 $40,000 Due July 1, 2006 $1.00 $1.00 Purchase, Option Buyout Due July 1, 2006 Siemens Promotional Pricing Available for shipments from Siemens thru March 31, 2005. Contracts must be signed and Leasing Terms met no later than March 1, 2005. I hope you find the Schedule A complete and to your satisfaction. If you have any questions or need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Customer Contract Acceptance Date Respectfully, Karin S. Poole VP Sales and Marketing/COO REALTIME COMMUNICATIONS All contracts are subject to credit approval. Quote Prepared By: Karin S. Poole, VP Sales and Marketing/COO Rearrime Communications 5450 Katella Ave, Suite 101 Los Alamitos, CA 90720 (562) 431-1300 Fax: (562) 431-3577 Veto* and Data Network Specialists SITE 1: CITY HALL The RealTime Communications proposal features the Siemens HiPath 3700/3750 2 Cabinet Communication Platform, 5OOORSyW Enterprise Management Sofbwans. 10GoptiPoint5OODigital telephones, 10 opbPoint41O Economy |P Phones, 1 Operator Console (PC Software), 2 T1 Cards and 2 CSU'a^ 1-8 Port CO Card. 120 digibsK24ana|og ports, 2-HG1500Vo|P Cards inclusive of 20 B Channels for Site-to-Site Connectivity and IP Users, 20-Port Callegra Unified Messaging System Software with 125 Client Licenses and 4 Fax Channel Licenses, and Music on Hold Adapter. All documentation will be provided onCDor electronically unless otherwise HBPath3700/2750 System boinclude: $ 9,300 HiPoth37O0/375U Cabinet 1 (7-slots) $ 4000 OTW1F Card, CMS, MK8C. MOH Adapter $ 4800 ` HiPot 37DO/375U Cabinet 3(8-o|ot ) $ 1950 2-TMGT1T1/PR|/CorNet Interface Cand(o)($185Oea) $ 3700 1-TK8GL88 Port CO Card ($ObOea) $ 650 5-GLKAD2424 Port Digital Cards ($1850 ea) 8 9250 1-SLA2424 Port Analog Card ($185Oea) $ 1850 2-CSU'e $ 400 VmUP iteCunneotionn\ $ 9,300 2-15OO Card v/4 Voice Channels $ 4500 8-Exoansionof2 Voice Channels $ 4800 5000 RSK8 Software (Customer Provided Hardware)* $ N8C Worhpo(nbs ¢17,080 1O-opt(Point5OO Entry Phones vv8NaUrnount Kits ($1OOea) $ 1000 9G-opUPoint5OO Standard G/L Phones (313Oea) $12480 1 -PC Based Attendant Console (Phone and Software CD)° $ 1500 1O'optiPoint41O Economy |P Phones ($21Oea) $ 2100 41O Pricing Includes: power supply, LAN Cable and {PLicense Centralized Vo[oemmaiUUnifb*d Messaging Application* 2O-PortCalleony Unified Messaging Software Uphu1O.00OVN1Boxes 125 Client Licenses Included 1-BasicTTS Session Included 4 Fax Licenses Included $ 3750 Product Subtotal Professional Services Inclusive of: Project Mgmt, Gofhwnre Deeign/prognamnninQ. Installation, Cutover Telco Testing On-Site End User Phone and VK8 Training: 2.5Days On-Site Admin Training: .S Day City Hall Total "Plus Tax *Customer Provided Hardware not included inpricing. Quote Prepared Karin m. Poole, vp Sales and Marketing/COO, RoaD3moCommmunicaUonu 545OKuteno Ave, Suite 101 Los Alamitos, CA8V72n (562) 431-1300 Fax: (562) 431-3577 SITE 2: COMMUNITY CENTER The RealTime Communications proposal features the Siemens HiPath 3550 communication platform, 12 optiPoint 500 Digital telephones, 3 optiPoint 410 Economy IP Phones, 1 Operator Console, 8 CO Connections, 16 digital/4 analog ports, 1-HG1500 VoIP Card inclusive of 8 B Channels for Site-bo-Gite Connectivity and |PUsers. All documentation will be provided onCDor electronically unless otherwise requested. HlpATH3S5O $ 7,300 Component Include: 1-HiPoih 3550 Cabinet, Control Board, 14.4 Modem, $ 1975 Power Supply, Option Adapter Cable, Ribbon Cable for V.24 Interface, External Music On Hold K]t, N1DF Adapter Cable 1.2.3.8-DiQiha[4-4no|oQConnections, MMC. CMS, Ventilator Kit 2-4 Channel CO Trunk Connections (S325ea) $ 650 1-MOF $ 65 1-GLU88-Port Digital Card ` $ GSO 1-15OOVo|P Card with 2 Voice Channels $ 2160 3-Expanoionof2 Voice Channels $ 1800 xxormpo/nta $ 2,690 12'opUPont5OO Standard G/L Phones ($13Oea) $ 1550 1 -Attendant Console A\dvw/16-buUonModule) $ 500 3-opUPoint41O Economy |P Phones ($21Oea) $ 630 410 Pricing Includes: power supply, LAN Cable and |PLicense Product Subtotal Professional Services Inclusive of: Project Mgmt, Gofbvana Design/Programming, Installation, Cutover Telco Testing On-Site End User Phone and VK8Training: .5 Day Community Center Total *Plus Tax Quote Prepared By: Karin n. Poole, vP Sales and Marketing/COO mua|TimoCommuninatipno 545OKoteUu Ave, Suite 1O1 Los Alamitos, CA8nr20 (562) 431-1300 Fax: (562) 431-3577 SITE 3: TEEN CENTER The ReaRlnmm Communications proposal features the Siemens HiPath355Ocommunication platform, 4 optiPoint 500 Digital telephones, 1 optiPoint 410 Economy IP Phones, 8 CO Connections, .8digibsK12 analog ports, 1-HG15OO Vol P Card inclusive of4B Channels for Site+ to+8ibaConnectivitvond|PUsec All documentation will be provided onCOorelectronically unless otherwise requested. H|PATH3SSO $ 6,100 Components Include: 1-HiPoth355OCabinet, Control Board, 14.4 Modem, $ 1975 Power Supply, Option Adapter Cable, Ribbon Cable for V.24 Interface, External Music On Hold Kit, K8DF.Adapher Cable 1,2.3, 8-Digital, 4-Analog Connect/ons, K8yNC, CMS, Ventilator Kit 2-4 Channel CO Trunk Connections ($325ea) $ 650 1-SLA8 $ 650 I-K8DF $ 65 1-1SOOVo|P Card with 3 Voice Channels $ 2160 1 -Expansion of2 Voice Channels $ GUO ' Worhpoioba $ 730 4-optipoint5OO Standard S/L Phones ($13Oea) $ 520 1-optiPoint41O Economy |P Phones /$21Oea) $ 210 41O Pricing Includes: power supply, LAN Cable and |PLicense Product Subtotal $ 6,830 Professional Services $ 2.500 Project Mgmt, Sofbmons Design/Programming, Installation, Cutover Telco Testing On-Site End User Phone and VK8Training: .5 Day ` Community Center Total $ 9'330° *Plus Tax Quote Prepared Karin S. Poole, vP Sales and Marketing/COO Roa|Tlme Communications 5450Kate||o Ave, Suite 1O1 Los Alamitos, CA9Or2D (562) 431-1300 Fax: (562) 431-3577 Voice and Data Hatwork spocial;rds SITE 4: CITY YARD The RealTime Communications proposal features the Siemens HiPath 3550 communication platform, 10 optiPoint 500 Digital telephones, 1 optiPoint 410 Economy IP Phone, 4 CO Connections, , 16 digital/4 analog ports, 1- HG1500 VoIP Card inclusive of 6 B Channels for Site- to-Site Connectivity and 1 IP User. All documentation will be provided on CD or electronically unless otherwise requested. HIPATH 3550 $ 6,375 Components Include: 1- HiPath 3550 Cabinet, Control Board, 14.4 Modem, $ 1975 Power Supply, Option Adapter Cable, Ribbon Cable for V.24 Interface, External Music On Hold Kit, MDF Adapter Cable 1,2,3, 8- Digital, 4- Analog Connections, MMC, CMS, Ventilator Kit 1 -4 Channel CO Trunk Connections ($325 ea) $ 325 1 -MDF $ 65 1 -SLU8 8 -Port Digital Card $ 650 1 -1500 VolP Card with 2 Voice Channels $ 2160 2- Expansion of 2 Voice Channels $ 1200 Workpoints $ 1,510 10- optiPoint 500 Standard S/L Phones ($130 ea) $ 1300 1- optiPoint 410 Economy IP Phones ($210 ea) $ 210 410 Pricing Includes: power supply, LAN Cable and IP License Product Subtotal $ 7,885 Professional Services $ 3,000 Project Mgmt, Software Design /Programming, Installation, Cutover Telco Testing On -Site End User Phone and VM Training: .5 Day Community Center Total $ 10,885* *Plus Tax and Shipping Quote Prepared By: Karin S. Poole, VP Sales and Marketing /COO RealTime Communications 5450 Katella Ave, Suite 101 Los Alamitos, CA 90720 (562) 431 -1300 Fax: (562) 431 - 3577 Voice and Date ftetwwk Speologisto Investment Analysis Location Product Pro Services Site Totals Site 1: City Hall $ 66,930 $ 9,600 $ 76,530 Site 2: Community Ctr $ 9,990 $ 3,000 $ 12,990 Site 3: Teen Center $ 6,830 $ 2,500 $ 9,330 Site 4: City Yard $ 7,885 $ 3,000 $ 10,885 5- Liberator Dig Cordless 2,500 $ inc above 2,500 Pre -Tax Totals $ 94,135 $18,100 $ 112,235 Tax 1 7,766 Labor -No Tax 1 7,766 Total $ 101,901 $ 18,100 $120,000 Payment Terms $40;000 Down Payment (Due with Initial Order) $40,000 Due July 1, 2005 $40,000 Due July 1, 2006 Siemens Promotional Pricing Available for shipments from Siemens thru March 31, 2005. Contracts must be signed no later than Feb 28, 2005. Maintenance 1.5 Yrs Maintenance and Parts Warrantee are included in this Contract. MAC (Moves, Adds and Changes) work is not included in maintenance. Maintenance begins the day following Cutover. Yearly Maintenance Contract Cost after 1.5 Years = $19,347 T &M Labor Rates M -F, Non - Holiday, 8 -5PM = $100.00 for first hr, $80.00 for each additional hr. Holidays and Weekend Rates = $120 for first hr, $100.00 for each additional hr. Quote Prepared By: Karin S. Poole, VP Sales and Marketing /COO RealTime Communications 5450 Katella Ave, Suite 101 Los Alamitos, CA 90720 (562) 431 -1300 Fax: (562) 431 -3577 n' CITY OF BALDWIN PARK .City Council Agenda Feb 16 2005 STAFF Item No V BALD IN P. A, R, K TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Jack Wong, Director of Housing t o " munity Development DATE: February 16, 2005 SUBJECT: CONTINUE TO MARCH 2, 20053 A request for consideration of a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact, an amendment to the General Plan (AGP -108), a Zone Change (Z- 542), a Development Plan (DR -28), and a Tentative Tract Map (TM- 62166) - Location: 4958 Maine Avenue; Applicant: Pedro and Martha Maltos. M-e" This report requests that the City Council continue this item to their March 2, 2005 Meeting. BACKGROUND /DISCUSSION This case was first heard by the City Council on December 1, 2004. At that meeting, the Council directed the Applicant to reduce the number of units within the project to four (4). At the City Council Meeting on February 2, 2005, members of the City Council expressed concern about the General Plan amendment and directed staff to look at possible alternatives that would allow for the construction of four (4) separate units (that would be for sale) without requiring the General Plan Amendment. Due to time constraints, staff is requesting additional time to complete the report in consultation with the City Attorney. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council continue this item until their meeting on March 2, 2005. Report Prepared By: Salvador Lopez Jr., Associate Planner `- r A . City Council Agenda Feb 16 2005 STAFF Item No. 13 Honorable Mayor and Members he City Council Jack Wong, Director of Housing an unity Development February 16, 2005 PURPOSE This report discusses a request for: 1) An Amendment to the City's General Plan Land Use Element to redesignate the subject property from Single- Family Residential to Multi- Family Residential; and 2) A Zone Change from OI, Office Industrial to R- 3(PD), Multi- Family Residential Planned Development; and 3) A Development Plan to allow the construction of a twelve (12) unit single- family detached planned development and common lot; and 4) A Zone Variance to allow less than the minimum required amount of guest parking spaces for a planned development; and 5) A Tentative Tract Map to subdivide two (2) lots into thirteen (13) lots for residential purposes. This report recommends that the City Council deny the requests, consistent with the Planning Commission's recommendations for denial. CEQA/NTICIN A Notice of Public Hearing was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and mailed to all property owners within a 300 -foot radius of the subject properties on December 30, 2004. AGP -109, Z -544, ZV -696, DR -29 and TM- 61346 February 16, 2005 Page 2 The Planning Division has completed an environmental analysis, and has determined that the project will not have a significant impact upon the environment. Pursuant to that information, a Draft Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact has been prepared pending approval by the City Council. AMOIKelaomp The subject property has a current General Plan Land Use designation of Single- Family Residential and is inconsistently zoned OI, Office Industrial. (Staff had anticipated that the zoning would be made consistent with the General Plan in connection with other zoning amendments in approximately six months.) The property is irregular in shape and contains approximately 38,469 square feet (.73 acres) of net area. The total site area is essentially flat and contains an existing single - family residence, which will eventually be demolished. The adjacent zoning and land uses are listed in the table below. Table 1 Adjacent Zoning & Land Use North- 1 -10 FWY San Bernardino Freeway South R -1 Single-Family Residences East R -1 Single-Family Residences West Athol St. Overpass — R -1 Single-Family Residences Currently, there is an existing billboard on the property that will result in an overhang onto a residential property (Lot #7). This billboard will be highly visible from the residences thereby creating a non-conducive _ living environment and exposure to continual illumination during the evening hours. The Applicant has not addressed issues concerning maintenance of the billboard. DISCUSSION - - 0 The General Plan Amendment and Zone Change are prerequisites to the preparation of the subject property for the proposed construction of a twelve (12) unit single- family detached planned development and common lot. In order for the development to take place, both the General Plan designation and zoning on the property will need to be changed to permit density consistent with Multi- Family Residential use of the property as well as a PD overlay to alter the otherwise required development standards. If the requested General Plan and Zone change are not approved, the existing density of the current general plan designation (single- family residential) would allow for seven (7) single - family detached units. However, since the City is still in process of updating AGP -109, Z -544, ZV -696, DR -29 and TM- 61346 February 16, 2005 Paae 3 the Zoning Code and Zoning Map to be consistent with the newly updated General Plan, a zone change from OI, Office Industrial to R -1, Single- Family Residential would still be required at this location. Recently, the City Council adopted an update to the General Plan that redesignated the subject property's land use designation from Office Industrial to Single - Family Residential. This change was consistent with the surrounding properties. These areas are fully built out with well- maintained housing developed at densities consistent with their Single Family Residential General Plan and zoning designations. The requested General Plan amendment does not compliment the existing neighboring properties nor is the proposed zoning in compliance with the newly updated General Plan. This zone change will also create a situation that is called "spot zoning ", in that a small area of land will be zoned in a manner incompatible with the immediate R -1 zoned and single - family residential designated properties surrounding it. Spot zoning has been held to be illegal when the City Council acts "unreasonably or without substantial evidence because no public benefit exists for the classification. Therefore, staff is of the opinion that the General Plan amendment and zoning requests be denied based on incompatibility with the adjacent single - family residential uses. In addition to the change in zoning, to multi - family, the applicant is requesting a zone change for the entire site to add the planned development (PD) overlay. The Planned Development (PD) designation allows for flexible development standards to encourage - -and achieve innovative developments exhibiting -a superior architecture and site design quality. Planned Development projects must, however, be compatible with, and enhance the surrounding neighborhood. Because the density proposed for this project significantly exceeds that of the surrounding neighborhood, staff is of the opinion that this project does not accomplish the objectives of the Planned Development overlay zone. DEVELOPMENT PLAN The applicant is proposing a twelve (12) unit single- family detached housing development with a common lot. According to the plans submitted to the Planning Division, the twelve (12) single - family homes will have access from a private driveway entering from Frazier Street. The private driveway is twenty -six (26) feet wide; a public street would be required to be at least forty (40) feet wide. Each residential unit will have its own enclosed private open space, ranging between 261 square feet and 1,529 square feet, which will be directly accessible from within that unit. This particular design will orientate one of the homes toward Frazier Street. Additional features of the project include: colored stamped `concrete within the driveway area, decorative block walls and landscaping within common open space areas. According to the floor plans and elevations, all residential units will be two -story with livable floor areas ranging from 1,416 square feet to 2,009 square feet (excluding the garages) and consist of four (4) bedrooms, 21/2 bathrooms and a two -car garage, with AGP -109, Z -544; ZV -696, DR -29 and TM -61346 February 16, 2005 Paae 4 the exception of Plan T, which contains three (3) bathrooms. The table below provides detailed information on unit floor areas (including garages), private open space areas and lot sizes: Table 2 Unit Floor Areas and Open Space Lot Number Floor Area Private Open Space Area Lot Size 1 2,066 532 2,459 s .ft. 2 1,877 444 2,170 s :ft. 3 2,066 525 2,480 s .ft. 4 1,877 461 2,170 s .ft. 5 2,066 525 2,440 s .ft. 6 1,877 482 2,071 s .ft. 7 1,877 804 3,231 s .ft. 8 1,925 651 2,277 s .ft. 9 2,469 842 3,233 s .ft. 10 2,469 1529 4,128 s .ft. 11 2,264 261 2,667 s .ft. 12 1,925 792 2,560 s .ft. 13 NA NA- 6,582 s .ft. - Building Height and Architectural Design The applicant has proposed to employ different designs and materials that will provide variety and aesthetic interest throughout the project. The exterior elevations of the proposed homes will have a mix of classic Spanish Mediterranean style architectural design. Design elements include a mixture of stucco- finished elevations, faux shutters, wrought iron and decorative veneers. Roofing material will consist of concrete tile. Although there are only five different floor plans proposed, each of the proposed units has been designed to avoid a "monolithic" appearance. The exterior walls and rooflines are staggered along both the vertical and horizontal planes. The roof and wall variations, along with the subtle changes in colors, help to visually reduce the mass and bulk of the buildings. Varying materials are utilized along the front elevation to emphasize an appealing view from the common areas. The project will involve the construction of six (6) foot high block walls around the perimeter of each unit to enclose the private open space areas. Any walls that are visible from the public right -of -way will be decorative block with a cap. ZONE VARIANCE Under the requested zoning designation, the City's Zoning Code requires that the development provide a total of fifteen (15) guest parking spaces on -site. However, the AGP -109, Z -544, ZV -696, DR -29 and TM -61346 February 16, 2005 Paae 5 site plan identifies only two parking spaces. The zone variance is being requested in order to allow less than the minimum required number of spaces for a twelve unit planned development. This type of variance request has been approved in the past for a residential project developed with a PD overlay. However, in the previous cases, there existed minimum driveway depths of eighteen feet, which can accommodate two vehicles without encroaching into the common driveway area. Only 3 of the 12 driveway areas meet the minimum dimension of eighteen feet needed to accommodate parked vehicles. Therefore, staff is unable to recommend an approval for the requested variance. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP — TM- 62166' The Tentative Tract Map illustrates the twelve (12) building footprints for the residential units, front yard areas and private rear yards. The thirteenth lot represents the common areas accessible to all owners within the development such as the guest parking stalls and the common private driveway. Approval of the tract map is possible only if the General Plan amendment, zone change and zone variance are approved, since the tract map is otherwise inconsistent with both the General Plan designation and zoning ordinances applicable to the property. Planning Commission Meeting At the December 16, ' 2004 - Planning Commission Meeting, the Commission recommended that the City Council deny all requested entitlements for the proposed development. Some of the Commission concerns are as follows: - Potential unsafe traffic conditions as a result of the entrance to the project being in close proximity to the Frazier St. off, ramp. - Deficient in guest parking spaces. Density is too high. Limited amount of usable private open space. RECOMMENDATION Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council: Adopt Resolution 2005 -006, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDIN PARK DENYING REQUESTS FOR (1) AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT TO REDESIGNATE PROPERTY FROM SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO MULTI- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, (2) A ZONE CHANGE FROM 01, OFFICE INDUSTRIAL TO R- 3(PD), MULTI- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, (3) A DEVELOPMENT PLAN ALLOWING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TWELVE (12) UNIT SINGLE - FAMILY DETACHED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND COMMON LOT, (4) A AGP -109, Z -544, ZV -696, DR -29 and TM -61346 February 16, 2005 Paae 6 ZONE VARIANCE TO ALLOW LESS THAN THE MINIMUM REQUIRED PARKING SPACES FOR A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, AND (5) A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO SUBDIVIDE TWO LOTS INTO SIX LOTS FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES (APPLICANT: D.C. CORPORATION; CASE NO.: AGP -109, Z -544, ZV -696, DR -29 and TM 61346; LOCATION: 819 FRAZIER STREET)" FINDINGS OF FACT —ZONE VARIANCE 1. That there are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of such property, which do not generally apply to other property in the same zone in that the property is flat and undeveloped, and the proposed development can be modified to provide the number of required guest parking spaces; and 2. That such variance is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property similarly situated, but which is denied to the property in question because there is no topographic or other conditions which prevent it from being developed with the required number of parking spaces. 3. That the granting of the variance will be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the adjacent property since the lack of guest parking would place the burden of parking on adjacent neighborhood streets; and 4. That the granting of the variance will adversely affect the General Plan of the City in that the General Plan designation of the subject property is single - family residential and the proposed multi- family development will generate significant amounts of extra vehicles. FINDINGS OF FACT — TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 1. That the site for the proposed development is not physically suitable for the development of twelve (12) single- family detached residential dwelling units unless an Amendment to the City's General Plan, a Development Plan and Zone Change (to R -3(PD) Residential Garden Planned Development for the entire site) are approved; and 2. That the design of the subdivision will create a threat to the Health, Safety and Welfare of the citizens of Baldwin Parkas the proposed density of the project is not compatible with the surrounding single- family residential zoning designations and uses which are well - established and well - maintained at a significantly greater density; and 3. That the Tentative Tract Map is not consistent with the City of Baldwin Park's General Plan, in that the land use designation of the subject property is single= AG P- 109, Z-544, ZV-696, DR-29 and TM-61346 February 16, 2005 Page 7 family residential and the requested zone change will not be in compliance or compatible with the General Plan land use designations; and 4. That development of the site in accordance with the Tentative Tract Map will not affect future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities for the area as the natural topography of the site is flat and the future development of twelve (12) 2-story dwelling units will therefore not affect said opportunities; and 5. That the proposed Tentative Map is in an area serviced by San Gabriel Valley Water District and the District has indicated that the proposal will not violate any water quality standards for the Water District. Although the Planning Commission and staff are recommending denial, if the City Council determines to approve the General Plan amendment and zone change, the following Conditions of Approval are recommended: XORIN 0 0 10=6 A 1 That the subject Property shall be developed and maintained in substantial compliance with Exhibit "A", dated January 19, 2005, except as modified herein by these conditions; and 2. That electric garage door openers shall be provided for each unit; and 3. That sectional roll-up garage doors shall be provided for each unit; and 4. That all landscaped areas must be separated from vehicular areas by a 6" continuous concrete curb; and 5. That a decorative block wall shall be provided surrounding the property. Decorative block walls with brick cap will be required along all exterior property Lines that are visible from the public right-of-way and the common driveway, proposed materials are subject to Planning Division approval. Interior property line delineator walls shall be precision block with a brick cap; and 6. Each of the homes shall be provided with decorative motion sensor lights at each garage and main level entrance door. Exterior lighting shall be decorative and automatically controlled. Manufacturer's literature shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval when plan are submitted to the Building Division for plan check; and 7. Each unit shall be pre-wired for an alarm system; and 8. A detailed landscaping plan shall be provided indicating the size, location, and species of all trees, shrubs, ground cover, and any other plan life proposed. This plan shall be submitted during plan check phase; and AGP -109, Z -544, ZV -696, DR -29 and TM -61346 February 16, 2005 Page 8 9. All Landscaping shall be automatically irrigated and a detailed irrigation plan shall be submitted during the plan check phase; and 10. That the applicant shall submit a copy of the proposed covenants, conditions and restrictions to the Planning Division prior to obtaining building permits. Said CC &Rs must be approved by the City Attorney for satisfaction with City requirements prior to issuance of such permits; and 11. That the CC &R's shall reflect that any future addition to individual units shall be limited to a patio cover which shall not exceed 25% of the rear yard area and shall meet all zoning code requirements; and 12. That the CC &R's shall reflect that vehicular parking within identified guest parking stalls shall not exceed 24 consecutive hours; and 13. That all utilities shall be undergrounded. This includes utility connections to each individual unit, as well as along the frontage of the property along Frazier Street; and 14. Provide the following information upon the Plan Check submittal: A. Three (3) architectural plans and one (1) extra site plan for the Fire Department B - Three (3) complete sets of Plans for the City. C. Two sets of the following are required: i. Soil Reports ii. Structural Calculations iii. Title 24 Energy Calculations 15. The conditions of the State Map Subdivision Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance must be met prior to recordation; and 16. All conditions of the Los Angeles County Fire Department must be met prior to recordation. A written notification or approval plan from the Fire Department must be submitted to the City; and 17. All special assessments and utilities or sewer connection fees are to be paid prior to recording the final map; and 18. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including water, gas, electricity, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the respective utility companies' standards. Easements shall be provided as required; and AGP -109, Z -544, ZV -696, DR -29 and TM -61346 February 16, 2005 Paae 9 19. Prior to recordation of the final map, a written certification from the Water District, GTE, SCE, SCG and Adelphia Cable stating that adequate facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed development shall be submitted to the City. The utility companies must issue such letter at least 30 days prior to final map approval; and 20. A title report/guarantee showing all fee owners and interest holders must be submitted when a final map is submitted for plan check. This account must remain open until the final map is filed with the County Recorder. An updated title report/guarantee must be submitted ten (10) working days prior to final map approval; and 21. The final map shall be based on a field survey; and 22. All surveying for the proposed development will be done by the developer, including the establishment of centerline ties; and 23. The surveyor's closure sheets must be enclosed with the final map; and 24. New boundary monuments must be set in accordance with City standards and subject to approval by the City Engineer; and 25. All easements existing prior to final map approval must be identified. If an easement is blanket or indeterminate in nature, a statement to that effect must be shown on the final map in lieu of its location; and 26. The following improvement plans, prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and drawn in accordance with the conditions of approval and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, must be submitted to the City's Engineering Division; a. Grading Plan b. Sewer Plan C. Street Plan d. Street Light Plan (per City Master Plan) 27. That the Developer shall submit a complete Hydrology study of the Project area and surrounding area affected by the development; and 28. That if the Los Angeles County Fire Department required additional hydrants or water pressure in addition to what already exists, or if the Los Angeles County Fire Department require a fire access road during construction, no building permits shall be issued by the City's Building Division (except demolition or grading permits) prior to written approval from the Los Angeles County Fire Department that either the conditions have been met or that the City may go ahead and issue building permits; and AGP -109, Z -544, ZV -696, DR -29 and TM -61346 February 16, 2005 Page 10 29. That no grading, building, demolition or construction permits shall be issued by the City prior to the applicant having ownership of the entire site; and final map approval; and 30. Submit to the office a Soils Report signed by a Registered Soils Engineer /Registered Civil Engineer; and 31. The following off -site improvements must be existing or guaranteed for: a) Construct new driveway approaches per plan. All driveway approaches shall meet ADA (American with Disability Act) requirements. b) Plant one street tree for each unit on the proposed development project. c) All parcels must have separate and independent connections to the main sewer line. d) Install water services and gas services for the development area per water and gas company. e) Provide maps in digital format to the County of Los Angeles per County requirements. f) Provide street lights for the proposed street per city master plan. g) Construct (2) two handicap ramps per City standard at the intersection of proposed street and Frazier Street. h) Apply for vacation of sanitary sewer easement. 32. The developer shall submit to the City Engineer the total cost estimate for bonding purposes of all off -site improvements prior to approval of the final map; and 33. All existing and proposed structures shall meet current zoning code requirements; and 34. If the City accepts approval of the final map prior to the completion of all required public improvements, the developer shall enter into a subdivision agreement with the City and shall post the appropriate security; and 35. A copy of the final map reduced to 8 1/2 x 11 ° shall be submitted to the Engineering Division prior to final tract map approval; and 36. Approval of this tentative map does not constitute approval of the site plan or building footprints; and 37. The City is being served by a cable TV franchise awarded to Adelphia Cable. All residential units constructed shall be prewired and made ready for cable TV connections; and 38. After the final map records, a mylar and two blueline prints shall be submitted to the Engineering Division at no cost to the City. Final occupancy will not be AGP -109, Z -544, ZV -696, DR -29 and TM -61346 February 16, 2005 Page 11 granted until the recorded map is received by the Engineering Division; and 39. Provide a copy of the final map on a disc in PC format; and 40. The developer is required to obtain a General Construction Storm Water Activity Permit (GCASWP) from the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board; and 41. The developer is required to submit a Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board approved Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) copy to the Department of Public Works for review. The SWPPP must always be kept on site and must be made available for review by the City inspection staff and the State of California Regional Water Quality Control Board upon request; and 42. An Erosion Control Plan (ECP) must also be submitted to the Engineering Division for review and approval; and 43. A Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) must be submitted along with other project plans for City approval. The project plan shall contain requirements specified by the City based on a project Standard Urban Water Mitigation Plan Evaluation Form to be provided by the Engineering Division; and 44. The approval of the proposed project shall be contingent upon provision of an - assessment by a- certified Traffic Engineer, of access road(s) to the subject properties. Traffic conditions shall be analyzed for the opening year. Occupancy permits shall be issued upon approval of sufficient and effective circulation at entry and exit points. In conjunction with the aforementioned assessments a warrant assessment shall be conducted to evaluate any potential installation of stop signs or traffic signal at the proposed entry /exit points. The developer shall implement, prepare submittals and pay for all costs /fees related to the Traffic Engineer's recommendations; and 45. The developer shall assure access for maintenance of the advertisement freeway billboard; and 46. The final map must be recorded within 24 months or all proceedings shall be terminated. ATTACHMENTS: #1 Exhibit "A" - Development Plan, dated February 16, 2004 #2 - Exhibit "B" - Existing Zoning and Land Use Designations #3 - Exhibit "C" - Proposed Zoning and Land Use Designation #4 - Environmental Data Draft Negative Declaration and Initial Study #5 - Application Form and Statements #6 - Resolution 2005 -006 $ =7 h � /* CA z LL E E 9E G zaa' I / A o� F 9�fl �t4�l ................ �. ,i I Yi3:ii�:.1a353..�51169�d:' .S.iit.iS;1� 1 #�Sd5191'�165 1 <3yi1711 x,`-, I; n I. c 4 Q �I 5y E �a t Y � i e 3�� VI §� - z 0 NI W� it . n � �f - -- IT a' Q �I 5y E �a t §� it Q �I 5y E �a t j x 8 � o Ay H. ✓ /I'� f ti J mdz ag U. I oa i �a _ i R a F v g w H zo 9 2 L < < o gill �� s f• ��° � �S� y2o �R m z.� e LL 0 Ey�m 1 � TiL. i : H �i i o 11 < ° i _ i R a F v g w H zo 9 2 L < < o gill Y � 4 �� a �� f• ��° � �S� y2o �R Se Y � 4 �� a 313 3116 3029 ® ® 12910 12918 30T ® ■ ® `�� 29. 29 129. 12961 3021 2cb 1 ® ■ ® ® 12946 12969 �v 3011 ® ` 3026 1< 12905 12911 12921 ®� 1 29 296 12971 12999 ® ® 12843 ■ =Q 12953 12819 ol ®� ■ ■ ■ ■ • ■ A • ■ ®®■ SAN ®® ®® 00000 ®® • ® ■® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® 1301 ®s ®L ♦ ®+ ®® L ®F ®1 soon ■ ■ 000 30 30 ®. ® ,too ^®n'oCp5 V D�GV 12911 ®® ®® 1302 c 128 ® ® 130 92 ® 1301 130 921 ® 130 ® 6 80 ® ® 1301 ® 919 1301 ® 12912 761 129 ® 130 130 130 ® 130 1292.0 755 749 QQ 760 765 � 130 A 1301 1130 130 \Q 130 1130 745 ? 754 759 1301 �� 91 130 739 \O 750 733 744 55 7 760 ' t 130 130 130 1� 13p 1283 28 28 2B 128 727 738 749 743 130 V 1 13D 130 732 - -, 130 131 LOCATION OF PROJECT: 819 Frazier Street, Baldwin Park DESRIPTION OF PROJECT: A request for consideration of an amendment to the City's General Plan Land Use Element, to redesignate the subject property from Single-Family Residential to Multi-Family Residential, a zone change from 01, Office Industrial to R-3(PD), Multi-Family Residential Planned Development, a development plan to allow the construction of a twelve (12) unit single-family detached planned development and common lot, a zone variance to allow less than the minimum required amount of guest parking stalls for a planned development and a tentative tract map to subdivide two (2) lots into thirteen (13) Tots for residential purposes. It is the opinion of the F__1 Zoning Administrator ❑ Planning Commission F_x_1 City Council ❑ Other that, upon review of the project, it has determined that the project will not have a significant effect upon the environment. Mitigation Measures are attached 8 are not required (Signature) -Principal Planner (Title) Date(s) of Public Notice: Legal advertisement - December 30, 2004 Posting'of the properties Written notice - December 30, 2004 (tnsw\forms\negdec) 1/97 DRAFT INITIAL STUDY. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 1. Project Title: A request for approval of an amendment to the City's General Plan Land Use Element, to redesignate the subject property from Single - Family Residential to Multi - Family Residential and a zone change from OI, Office Industrial to R- 3(PD), Multi - Family Residential Planned Development. A Development Plan to allow the construction of a twelve (12) unit single - family detached planned development and common lot. An additional request is for approval of a zone variance to allow less than the minimum required amount of guest parking spaces for a planned development. A related request is for approval of a tentative tract map to subdivide two (2) lot into thirteen (13) lots for residential purposes. - 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Baldwin Park 14403 E. Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, CA 91706 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Salvador Lopez Jr., Assistant Planner (626) 813 -5261 4. Project Location: 819 Frazier Street 5. Assessor's Parcel Number: 8559 - 011 -002 & 008 6. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: D. C. Corporation 2149 E. Garvey North, Suite A -12 West Covina, CA 91791 7. General Plan Designation: Single - Family Residential (current) Multi- Family Residential Planned Development (proposed) 8. Zoning: OI (current) R -3(PD) (proposed) 9. Surrounding Land Uses Incorporated in 1956, the City of Baldwin Park is located and Settings: approximately 17 miles east of downtown Los Angeles. The intersection of the 1 -10 (San Bernardino) and 1 -605 (San Gabriel River) freeways lies near the southwest corner of this 6.8 square mile City. Although Baldwin Park is predominantly a residential bedroom community, recent efforts have placed a greater emphasis on promoting commercial and industrial land uses. However, the City is near "build- out", focusing efforts on the Redevelopment of land, especially within close proximity to the freeway. According to the 2000 Census, Baldwin Park has approximately 75,900 persons. This is more than double the population in 1960. Baldwin Park is predominantly a Hispanic working class community, although between the 1990 and 2000 Census has experienced a recent increase in its Asian population. Furthermore, the City has a considerably larger than average household size than the County average, suggesting increased pressure on the City's housing stock and the provision of services. ,0-"" $ ld---- �AT.Yof 'JuDaldwin Park ��Q �� Introduction, Purpose and Need for the Project: Recently, the Planning Division has received an application fora Development Plan to develop a tv«8|vg (12) unit single-family detached residential development. CunenUy, the zoning for the subject property is [)[ Office Industrial and the General Plan designation is Single-Family Residential. In order for the development to take place, an Amendment to the City's General Plan and a ZDng Change will be required t0 redesignate the property from single-family residential to rDulti'h]nnUyresidenUa{. Additionally, 8Zone Change to add a Planned Development /PD\overlay is required. - Project Characteristics: A request for approval of an amendment to the City's General Plan Land Use Element, to redesignate the subject property from Single-Family Residential to Multi-Family Residential and e zone change from C)|'Office Industrial to R-3/PC), Multi-Family Residential Planned Development. A Development Plan to allow the construction of e twelve (12) unit single-family detached planned development and common lot. An additional request io for approval 0fa zone variance to allow less than the minimum required amount of guest parking spaces fora planned development. A related request is for approval of a tentative tract mop to subdivide two /2\ |obo into thirteen /13\ lots for residential purposes. 11' Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g.,permits, financing approval, mr participation agreement) No additional public approvals beyond Planning Commission and City Council will be required for this project. 12. References ' The following are also referenced where appropriate in the Environmental Checklist Form: a. General Plan b. Municipal Code C. Zoning Code d. Emergency Coordinator e. Geological Map—Liquefaction Zones 1\ A brief explanation is required for all 8navverG' except "N0 |nnpaoC anavvgra that are adequately supported by the iOf0nn8Uon sources 8 }8eU agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "N0 |rn 8of answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls ouhSido 8haU|t rupture zuO8). A ''No {nnpacf' answer should be explained where itia based oD project-specific f8ctQraem/eUaS8enena|StandandS'(e.g.. the project will nOt expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis.) 2\ All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including offsite as well as onmK*' cumulative aa well asp jeot|ave[iOdi[eot8Svv8Uasdir8Ct and construction aawell as operational impacts. 3\ Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact' is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact' to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross - referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiring, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. C) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures, which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site - specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate , - include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: Explanation of Checklist Judgements: I(a). No Impact. The project will not have an adverse affect on a scenic vista or result in the obstruction of any scenic views. I(b). No Impact. This project will not result in the damage or destruction of scenic resources or historical buildings. I(c). No Impact. This project will not substantially degrade the existing visual character and quality of the site and its surroundings. Through the Design Review process, the project has been designed so as to ensure no aesthetic offensive site, building or mechanical equipment will be open to public view. I(d). No Impact. This project will not create any new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the residential zones. Less Than Less Than Potentially Significant Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With AESTHETICS Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Impact Mitigation Impact In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are Incorporation Would the project: El a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? El 1:1 C) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Explanation of Checklist Judgements: I(a). No Impact. The project will not have an adverse affect on a scenic vista or result in the obstruction of any scenic views. I(b). No Impact. This project will not result in the damage or destruction of scenic resources or historical buildings. I(c). No Impact. This project will not substantially degrade the existing visual character and quality of the site and its surroundings. Through the Design Review process, the project has been designed so as to ensure no aesthetic offensive site, building or mechanical equipment will be open to public view. I(d). No Impact. This project will not create any new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the residential zones. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: II(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not convert any type of farmland to a non - agricultural use. II(b). No Impact. The proposed project will not conflict with zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than II AGRICULTURE RESOURCES Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project. a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? C) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: II(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not convert any type of farmland to a non - agricultural use. II(b). No Impact. The proposed project will not conflict with zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract. II(c). No Impact. The project will not result in the conversion of farm land to non - agricultural uses. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: III(a). No Impact. The proposed project does not conflict with any applicable air quality plan. The City of Baldwin Park is located within the South Coast Air Basin which is a non - attainment area for selective pollutants. Air pollution is a regional problem. Pollution levels in Baldwin Park are a result of not only local emissions, but also of those throughout the region. Ill(b). No Impact. The project will not result in a cumulative net increase of pollutants for which the region is in non- attainment. III(c). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the region is in non - attainment. The Southern California Association of Governments and the South Coast Air Quality Management District have adopted a South Coast Air Quality Management Plan ( SCAQMP). The proposed project is consistent with that plan and will not have a significant impact upon air quality. However, there will be temporary increases in air pollutant emissions during the construction phase. Construction dust and air pollution, however, will be reduced with the following procedures. Procedures to reduce air pollution include the following: 1) That the applicant adhere to the SCAQMD Rule 403 insuring the clean up construction related dirt on approach routes to the site. 2) The watering techniques shall be employed to partially mitigate the impact of construction generated dust particles. 3) Maintenance and servicing of construction equipment to minimize exhaust emissions. 4) Halting of construction activities during Stage 1 and Stage 2 smog alerts. III(d). No Impact. The proposed project will not expose any nearby sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Potentially Less Than Significant With Less Than III AIR QUALITY Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact p Incorporation Impact p Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relief upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: El El N a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? El El 11 0 b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? C) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air El 0 El quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? 11 11 El 0 e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: III(a). No Impact. The proposed project does not conflict with any applicable air quality plan. The City of Baldwin Park is located within the South Coast Air Basin which is a non - attainment area for selective pollutants. Air pollution is a regional problem. Pollution levels in Baldwin Park are a result of not only local emissions, but also of those throughout the region. Ill(b). No Impact. The project will not result in a cumulative net increase of pollutants for which the region is in non- attainment. III(c). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the region is in non - attainment. The Southern California Association of Governments and the South Coast Air Quality Management District have adopted a South Coast Air Quality Management Plan ( SCAQMP). The proposed project is consistent with that plan and will not have a significant impact upon air quality. However, there will be temporary increases in air pollutant emissions during the construction phase. Construction dust and air pollution, however, will be reduced with the following procedures. Procedures to reduce air pollution include the following: 1) That the applicant adhere to the SCAQMD Rule 403 insuring the clean up construction related dirt on approach routes to the site. 2) The watering techniques shall be employed to partially mitigate the impact of construction generated dust particles. 3) Maintenance and servicing of construction equipment to minimize exhaust emissions. 4) Halting of construction activities during Stage 1 and Stage 2 smog alerts. III(d). No Impact. The proposed project will not expose any nearby sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. III(e). No Impact. The proposed project will not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. Explanation of Checklist Judgements IV(a). No Impact. The project will not have any effect on any species identified by the California Department of Fish and Game or the US Fish and Wildlife Service. IV(b). No Impact. The project will not have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in any local or regional plans, policies regulations or by the California Department of Fish and game or by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. IV(c). No Impact. The project will not have a substantial effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. There are no federally protected wetlands within the City of Baldwin Park. IV(d). No Impact. The project will not interfere with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites as the City of Baldwin Park is within an urbanized area and not within five (5) miles of a wildlife corridor. IV(e). No Impact. The proposed project does not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, as the City of Baldwin Park does not have any ordinances protecting trees, wildlife, etc... IV(f). No Impact. The project proposal will not conflict with any provisions of an adopted habitat conservation plan, natural community conservation plan or any local, regional or state habitat conservation plan, as the City's General plan does not indicate any of the referenced plans which could be affected by the project proposal Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than IV BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. C) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, El 11 0 etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan; Natural Community Conservation Plan, El El 11 0 or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation Ian? Explanation of Checklist Judgements IV(a). No Impact. The project will not have any effect on any species identified by the California Department of Fish and Game or the US Fish and Wildlife Service. IV(b). No Impact. The project will not have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in any local or regional plans, policies regulations or by the California Department of Fish and game or by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. IV(c). No Impact. The project will not have a substantial effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. There are no federally protected wetlands within the City of Baldwin Park. IV(d). No Impact. The project will not interfere with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites as the City of Baldwin Park is within an urbanized area and not within five (5) miles of a wildlife corridor. IV(e). No Impact. The proposed project does not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, as the City of Baldwin Park does not have any ordinances protecting trees, wildlife, etc... IV(f). No Impact. The project proposal will not conflict with any provisions of an adopted habitat conservation plan, natural community conservation plan or any local, regional or state habitat conservation plan, as the City's General plan does not indicate any of the referenced plans which could be affected by the project proposal Explanation of Checklist Judgements: V(a), No Impact. The project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. V(b). No Impact. The project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource. V(c). No Impact. The project will not directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or geological feature. V(d). No Impact. The project is not expected to disturb any human remains. The City of Baldwin Park does not have any cemeteries. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than V CULTURAL RESOURCES Significant With Significant No Impact ' Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: ® ® ❑ a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical adverse effects; including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: resource as defined in Section 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geological feature? substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred formal outside of cemeteries? Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. El 11 El El 11 El Explanation of Checklist Judgements: V(a), No Impact. The project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. V(b). No Impact. The project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource. V(c). No Impact. The project will not directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or geological feature. V(d). No Impact. The project is not expected to disturb any human remains. The City of Baldwin Park does not have any cemeteries. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than VI GEOLOGY AND SOILS Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects; including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. El 11 El El 11 El 11 El 11 0 ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic - related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? C) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and El potentially result in on or offsite landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 -1 -B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risk 11 El El to life or prope ? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? VI(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects involving the rupture of a known earthquake fault. According to the City's General plan, there are no active faults within the City of Baldwin Park, therefore no Alquist- Priolo Special Study Zones are within the City. Although there are no active faults within the City of Baldwin Park, there are several major faults surrounding the City, which have the potential for causing major damage; however, the occurrence of direct ground rupture is not likely according to the City's General Plan. Potential for this type of activity is similar throughout Southern California and no unique or unusual risk is posed by the proposed project. According to the Seismic Hazard Zones Map dated 3/99 from the State Department of Geology and Mines, the project area is not within a liquefaction zone. VI(b). No Impact. The City is located in a relatively flat urbanized area with a very low potential for wind and water erosion of soils. VI(c). No Impact. The City is not located on a geological unit or soil that is unstable and could . result in landslide, spreading liquefaction or collapse according to the Seismic Hazards Zone Map dated March 25, 1999 from the State geologists Office. VI(d). No Impact. The City and the project area are located on a very low -to -low expansive soil as defined in Table 18 -1 -B of the UBC (1997). Therefore the project will not create any risk to life or property. VI(e). No Impact. The proposed project's location does have sewers available for the disposal of wastewater. Furthermore, the soils at the proposed location can adequately support the use of the sewers. Less Than 1/111 HAZARDS AND Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact HAZARDOUSMATERIALS Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? C) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one- quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code El 11 0 Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: VII(a). No Impact. The project will not create a significant hazard to the public through the routine transport use or disposal of hazardous materials. It is not anticipated that there will be any hazardous materials associated with the proposed project. VII(b). No Impact. There will be no significant hazard to the public or the environment regarding the upset or release of hazardous materials into the environment. VII(c). No Impact. The project will not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous material, substances or waste within one - quarter of an existing school. VII(d). No Impact. The proposed project is not located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous materials sites. VII(e). No Impact. The project is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public airport, and therefore would not create a hazard to people residing or working in the area. VII(f). No Impact. Since the project is not within the vicinity of a private airstrip, the project would not create a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area. VII(g). No Impact. According to the City's Emergency Operations Coordinator, the project proposal will not impair implementation or physically interfere with the City's adopted emergency plan or emergency evacuation plan. VII(h). No Impact. The project proposal is within a highly urbanized area and will therefore not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires. Less Than VIII HYDROLOGY AND WATER Potentially Significant Less Than QUALITY Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? C) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on or offsite? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on or offsite? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: VU/(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements, as the facility will generate minimal amounts of solid vv8ote typical for this particular residential use. In addition, the applicant will be required to implement the requirements of the National Pollution Elimination Discharge Gyaborn (NP[}EE), which regulates water quality runoff. yU|(b). No )nnp8nt. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies or interfere with groundwater recharge. VU|(c). NO |nnoaot. The proposed project will not substantially alter the course of an adjacent Stnaann or rive[ which vvuu|d result in erosion, or siltation of the site as there is no atnaann or river running through the City, which the exception of the channelized San Gabriel River. V|U(d).No Impact. The proposed project wiUDOtSubSt8ntia/k/aU*rthednyin8gepatt8rnaofUloCdv and will not alter the course ofestream or rive[, as there are no streams or rivers in the City with the exception of the channe|ized San Gabriel River. VUKe\. No Impact. The project will not create or contribute nuD'Dff, which would exceed the capacity of the existing storm drain ayainnn. Nor will the proposed project provide any polluted run-off. N11A0. No Impact. The project will not degrade the existing water quality because of the limited amount of impervious surfaces associated with the project. \4Ukd. No Impact. The project proposal will not place housing within a1 r flood hazard area. Furthermore, the City is not within a Flood Zone. Federal Emergency Management Association (FEMA) has the City of Baldwin Park classified as Zone C-0601 00. NU(h).NnImpact. The proposal is not within 81 flood hazard area. BMA has classified the City Vf Baldwin Park 8s Zone C—OOO100. \4U(0. No |rnoaoL The project proposal will not expose people or structures tQa significant risk VY loss involving flooding oaa direct result Of the failure of@ levee ordam. Although the Santa Fe d8no is located directly adjacent bJ the City across Arrow Highway, large-scale flooding as a result Of failure of this particular d@nn is negligible due to the design of the d8on in that water iS present in the dam only a few months of the year. V1110. No Impact. Since Baldwin Park is an inland City, dcould not experience e tsunami and the few bodies of water in Baldwin Park are small enough that they would not be able to produce 8aeicho large enough to cause any damage. Furthermore, Baldwin Park is an urbanized Less Than Vill HYDROLOGY AND WATER Potentially Significant Less Than QUALITY Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Ma2 or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? El 1:1 j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow ? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: VU/(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements, as the facility will generate minimal amounts of solid vv8ote typical for this particular residential use. In addition, the applicant will be required to implement the requirements of the National Pollution Elimination Discharge Gyaborn (NP[}EE), which regulates water quality runoff. yU|(b). No )nnp8nt. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies or interfere with groundwater recharge. VU|(c). NO |nnoaot. The proposed project will not substantially alter the course of an adjacent Stnaann or rive[ which vvuu|d result in erosion, or siltation of the site as there is no atnaann or river running through the City, which the exception of the channelized San Gabriel River. V|U(d).No Impact. The proposed project wiUDOtSubSt8ntia/k/aU*rthednyin8gepatt8rnaofUloCdv and will not alter the course ofestream or rive[, as there are no streams or rivers in the City with the exception of the channe|ized San Gabriel River. VUKe\. No Impact. The project will not create or contribute nuD'Dff, which would exceed the capacity of the existing storm drain ayainnn. Nor will the proposed project provide any polluted run-off. N11A0. No Impact. The project will not degrade the existing water quality because of the limited amount of impervious surfaces associated with the project. \4Ukd. No Impact. The project proposal will not place housing within a1 r flood hazard area. Furthermore, the City is not within a Flood Zone. Federal Emergency Management Association (FEMA) has the City of Baldwin Park classified as Zone C-0601 00. NU(h).NnImpact. The proposal is not within 81 flood hazard area. BMA has classified the City Vf Baldwin Park 8s Zone C—OOO100. \4U(0. No |rnoaoL The project proposal will not expose people or structures tQa significant risk VY loss involving flooding oaa direct result Of the failure of@ levee ordam. Although the Santa Fe d8no is located directly adjacent bJ the City across Arrow Highway, large-scale flooding as a result Of failure of this particular d@nn is negligible due to the design of the d8on in that water iS present in the dam only a few months of the year. V1110. No Impact. Since Baldwin Park is an inland City, dcould not experience e tsunami and the few bodies of water in Baldwin Park are small enough that they would not be able to produce 8aeicho large enough to cause any damage. Furthermore, Baldwin Park is an urbanized City with no hillsides to speak of and therefore, damage caused by mudflow would be negligible. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: IX(a). No Impact. The proposed Zone Change and General Plan Amendment will not physically divide an established community but will increase the allowable density previously allowed in the single - family residential zone. The maximum permitted density for the current single- family zoning is 0 to 8.7 du /ac. The maximum permitted density for the newly created multi - family zoning will be 12.1 to 20 du /ac. This increase in density will allow for the construction of a twelve (12) unit residential planned development provided that the development meets all standards and criteria set forth in the City's Zoning Code and Design Guidelines for a residential planned development IX(b). No Impact. The proposed project, if approved, will not be in conflict with any land use plan, policy or regulation of an agency that has jurisdiction over the project adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. ' Thus, not creating any conflict with the land use map (proposed to be amended) if the request is approved.: IX(c). No Impact. Currently the City has no habitat conservation plans or natural community conservation plans which would possible be affected by the proposed project. Less Than Less Than Potentially Significant Potentially Significant Less Than Significant IX LAND USE AND PLANNING Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Would the project: Incorporation a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents Would the project: El 0 a) Physically divide an established community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? C) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: IX(a). No Impact. The proposed Zone Change and General Plan Amendment will not physically divide an established community but will increase the allowable density previously allowed in the single - family residential zone. The maximum permitted density for the current single- family zoning is 0 to 8.7 du /ac. The maximum permitted density for the newly created multi - family zoning will be 12.1 to 20 du /ac. This increase in density will allow for the construction of a twelve (12) unit residential planned development provided that the development meets all standards and criteria set forth in the City's Zoning Code and Design Guidelines for a residential planned development IX(b). No Impact. The proposed project, if approved, will not be in conflict with any land use plan, policy or regulation of an agency that has jurisdiction over the project adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. ' Thus, not creating any conflict with the land use map (proposed to be amended) if the request is approved.: IX(c). No Impact. Currently the City has no habitat conservation plans or natural community conservation plans which would possible be affected by the proposed project. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: X(a). No Impact. The project will not result in the loss of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region or the residents of the State. There are no known mineral resources located within the City of Baldwin Park according to the City's General Plan. X(b). No Impact.- The project will not result in the loss of a locally important mineral resource recovery site, as the City's General Plan does not indicate any known mineral resources. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than MINERAL RESOURCES Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally - important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, s ecific plan, or other land use plan? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: X(a). No Impact. The project will not result in the loss of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region or the residents of the State. There are no known mineral resources located within the City of Baldwin Park according to the City's General Plan. X(b). No Impact.- The project will not result in the loss of a locally important mineral resource recovery site, as the City's General Plan does not indicate any known mineral resources. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XI(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not result in the exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the City's General Plan, noise ordinance or applicable standards of other agencies. Should the project be approved, noise levels would increase temporarily during the construction phase of the project. Construction is regulated by the City and is addressed in the Municipal Code to limit overall noise levels to an acceptable range. Increased population and development will result in increasing noise from a variety of sources commonly found in an urban environment (human activities, mechanical equipment, automobiles, pets, etc.). This increase is considered to be less than significant. XI(b). No Impact. The project will not result in the exposure of persons to generation of excess ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels. XI(c). No Impact. The project will not result in a substantial permanent increase of ambient noise levels. XI(d). No Impact. The project will not result in a substantial or periodic increase in ambient noise levels above levels that exist. XI(e). No Impact. The City of Baldwin Park is not located within an airport land use plan not within two miles of an airport. Therefore, the amendment will not expose people to excessive noise levels. XI(f). No Impact. The City of Baldwin Park is not within the vicinity of a private airstrip. Therefore, the amendment will not expose people to excessive noise levels. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Xf NOISE Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project result /n: El El N 11 a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or apelicable standards of other agencies? El 11 El 0 b). Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground bome vibration or ground borne noise levels? El 11 C) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XI(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not result in the exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the City's General Plan, noise ordinance or applicable standards of other agencies. Should the project be approved, noise levels would increase temporarily during the construction phase of the project. Construction is regulated by the City and is addressed in the Municipal Code to limit overall noise levels to an acceptable range. Increased population and development will result in increasing noise from a variety of sources commonly found in an urban environment (human activities, mechanical equipment, automobiles, pets, etc.). This increase is considered to be less than significant. XI(b). No Impact. The project will not result in the exposure of persons to generation of excess ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels. XI(c). No Impact. The project will not result in a substantial permanent increase of ambient noise levels. XI(d). No Impact. The project will not result in a substantial or periodic increase in ambient noise levels above levels that exist. XI(e). No Impact. The City of Baldwin Park is not located within an airport land use plan not within two miles of an airport. Therefore, the amendment will not expose people to excessive noise levels. XI(f). No Impact. The City of Baldwin Park is not within the vicinity of a private airstrip. Therefore, the amendment will not expose people to excessive noise levels. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XII(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The provision of twelve (12) residential units will increase the population of the area, which will result in higher levels of traffic and increased demands on municipal agencies. The increase in population will create a less than significant impact. According to the Population and Housing Estimates for Individual Counties from the Department of Finance, an increase would be expected to occur with an average of 4.636 persons per dwelling, which creates an approximate increase of fifty -six (56) persons. The potential result of increased manpower and equipment needed to serve citywide demands are evaluated annually. The provision of twelve (12) residential units is considered less than a significant impact. The zone change will not increase the population by 56 people but rather is only a net increase of twenty -three (23) persons (5 units) based on the thirty -three (33) persons (7 -R -1 units) allowed under the R -1, Single - Family Zoning. XII(b). No Impact. The proposed project will not displace any existing housing units that will necessitate the replacement or construction of residential units. XII(c). No Impact. The proposed project will not displace substantial number of individuals /families necessitating the construction of replacement housing. Less Than Less Than Potentially Significant Potentially Significant Less Than Significant X11 POPULATION AND HOUSING Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Would the project: result in substantial adverse physical impacts Incorporation Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of 11 El roads or other infrastructure)? service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for El 11 b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing any of the public services? elsewhere? El El 11 a) Fire protection? C) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the housing C) Schools? construction of replacement elsewhere? e) Other public facilities? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XII(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The provision of twelve (12) residential units will increase the population of the area, which will result in higher levels of traffic and increased demands on municipal agencies. The increase in population will create a less than significant impact. According to the Population and Housing Estimates for Individual Counties from the Department of Finance, an increase would be expected to occur with an average of 4.636 persons per dwelling, which creates an approximate increase of fifty -six (56) persons. The potential result of increased manpower and equipment needed to serve citywide demands are evaluated annually. The provision of twelve (12) residential units is considered less than a significant impact. The zone change will not increase the population by 56 people but rather is only a net increase of twenty -three (23) persons (5 units) based on the thirty -three (33) persons (7 -R -1 units) allowed under the R -1, Single - Family Zoning. XII(b). No Impact. The proposed project will not displace any existing housing units that will necessitate the replacement or construction of residential units. XII(c). No Impact. The proposed project will not displace substantial number of individuals /families necessitating the construction of replacement housing. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XIII(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project should not result in the additional need for new or altered fire protection and will not alter acceptable service ratios or response times. The net increase of 23 persons is considered less than significant. Currently Station Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than X111 PUBLIC SERVICES Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services? El 0 El a) Fire protection? b) Police protection? C) Schools? d) Parks? e) Other public facilities? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XIII(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project should not result in the additional need for new or altered fire protection and will not alter acceptable service ratios or response times. The net increase of 23 persons is considered less than significant. Currently Station 29 serves the City, which is located at Los Angeles Street and Maine Avenue. Whether or not the project would require additional police service or fire staff depends on the total requirements of the City and County. XIII(b). Less Than Significant Impact. Public services are already in place to serve this development. Although the project may result in some increase in police calls, the net increase of 23 persons is considered less than significant. XIII(c). Less Than Significant Impact. The net impact of the project on the school facilities will have less than a significant impact. There would be an increase in local school enrollment. However, the project would only result in,an estimated net increase in population of up to 23 persons with up to nine (9) school -aged children (40% of the total between the ages of 0- 20). School impact fees collected prior to occupancy are intended to offset any potential demand for new school facilities. School Development fees in the amount of $2.14/s.f. shall be paid to the Baldwin Park Unified School District prior to obtaining building permits. These fees are considered to provide full and complete school facilities. Therefore, the net increase of 23 persons and nine (9) school -aged children is considered less than significant. XIII(d). Less Than Significant Impact. Although residential development for this proposed project will provide an estimated net increase of 23 persons and up to nine (9) school -aged children to the population, the project is not expected to significantly impact the City's existing parks or recreational facilities. The City's Development Tax collected prior to occupancy is intended to offset any potential demand for recreational facilities. Therefore, the estimated net increase of 23 persons and up to nine (9) school -aged children is considered less than significant. Xill(e). No impact.- The proposed project will not require the need for new or physically altered public facilities. XIV(a). No Impact. The proposed project is not expected to significantly impact the City's existing parks or recreational facilities. XIV(b). No Impact. The proposed project does not require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than XIV RECREATION Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation a) Would the project increase the use of existing a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in relation neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the congestion at intersections)? facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? XIV(a). No Impact. The proposed project is not expected to significantly impact the City's existing parks or recreational facilities. XIV(b). No Impact. The proposed project does not require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than XV TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC Significant With significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project. a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XV(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will result in an estimated increase in traffic generated by the net gain of 5 residential units, which will be less than a significant impact. According to the Trip Generation Handbook by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (5th ed.) each dwelling unit will generate approximately 9.55 trip ends per dwelling unit on a weekday, 10.19 trip ends on Saturday, 8.78 trip ends on Sunday with an average of about 9.5 trip ends per day. According to the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan, continued development in Baldwin Park consistent with land use policy will create additional vehicle trips over the long term. To identify how new trips will place increasing demands on the City's constrained roadway system, estimates were made on long term growth both in Baldwin Park as well as surrounding communities, since nonresidents travel through Baldwin Park to reach other destinations. This analysis revealed that absent any improvements to the local roadway system, the City could be expected to experience declines in service levels on may local streets, meaning increased congestion and delays. Dalewood Street north of Judith Street (directly adjacent to the proposed development) is an area identified as a particular concern. This analysis identifies a need for the City to continuously and closely monitor conditions over time and to make adjustments to the circulation system incrementally. The net gain of 5 residential units at this location is not substantial and thus will not require large -scale physical improvements. Approval of the proposed project shall be contingent upon provision of an assessment by a certified Traffic Engineer, of access road(s) to the subject properties. Traffic conditions shall be analyzed for the opening year. Occupancy permits shall be issued upon approval of sufficient and effective circulation at entry and exit points. In conjunction with the aforementioned assessments a warrant assessment shall be conducted to evaluate any potential installation of stop signs or traffic signal at the proposed entry /exit points. The developer shall implement, prepare submittals and pay for all costs /fees related to the Traffic Engineer's recommendations. XV(b). No Impact. The proposal will not exceed a level of service standard established by the County Congestion Management Agency for designated roads or highways. XV(c). No Impact. The proposal will not result in a change or increase in air traffic patterns or levels that result in substantial safety risks. XV(d)'. No Impact. The proposal will not increase hazards due to a design feature or incompatible uses, as the project does not include new construction of streets. XV(e). No Impact. The project will not result in inadequate emergency access. b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? C) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses e.., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicvcle racks)? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XV(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will result in an estimated increase in traffic generated by the net gain of 5 residential units, which will be less than a significant impact. According to the Trip Generation Handbook by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (5th ed.) each dwelling unit will generate approximately 9.55 trip ends per dwelling unit on a weekday, 10.19 trip ends on Saturday, 8.78 trip ends on Sunday with an average of about 9.5 trip ends per day. According to the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan, continued development in Baldwin Park consistent with land use policy will create additional vehicle trips over the long term. To identify how new trips will place increasing demands on the City's constrained roadway system, estimates were made on long term growth both in Baldwin Park as well as surrounding communities, since nonresidents travel through Baldwin Park to reach other destinations. This analysis revealed that absent any improvements to the local roadway system, the City could be expected to experience declines in service levels on may local streets, meaning increased congestion and delays. Dalewood Street north of Judith Street (directly adjacent to the proposed development) is an area identified as a particular concern. This analysis identifies a need for the City to continuously and closely monitor conditions over time and to make adjustments to the circulation system incrementally. The net gain of 5 residential units at this location is not substantial and thus will not require large -scale physical improvements. Approval of the proposed project shall be contingent upon provision of an assessment by a certified Traffic Engineer, of access road(s) to the subject properties. Traffic conditions shall be analyzed for the opening year. Occupancy permits shall be issued upon approval of sufficient and effective circulation at entry and exit points. In conjunction with the aforementioned assessments a warrant assessment shall be conducted to evaluate any potential installation of stop signs or traffic signal at the proposed entry /exit points. The developer shall implement, prepare submittals and pay for all costs /fees related to the Traffic Engineer's recommendations. XV(b). No Impact. The proposal will not exceed a level of service standard established by the County Congestion Management Agency for designated roads or highways. XV(c). No Impact. The proposal will not result in a change or increase in air traffic patterns or levels that result in substantial safety risks. XV(d)'. No Impact. The proposal will not increase hazards due to a design feature or incompatible uses, as the project does not include new construction of streets. XV(e). No Impact. The project will not result in inadequate emergency access. XV(f). No Impact. The proposed project will not have an impact on existing parking facilities or create a need for new parking as the site meets the required parking standards contained within the Municipal Code. Private parking areas contained within the required two car garages will be provided for each dwelling unit as well as guest parking. XV(g). No Impact. The proposed project will not conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XVI(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. XVI(b). No Impact. The proposed project will not require the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or the expansion of existing facilities. XVI(c). No Impact. The project site is not within a flood zone area. The increase in impervious surfaces primarily due to the proposed street will marginally increase runoff from the project area. The project will be required to provide satisfactory drainage to available storm drains. XVI(d). No Impact. The project will not affect existing water supplies provided to the City. XVI(e). No Impact. The proposed amendment does not involve a project that will result in a determination by the watershed treatment provider that it has adequate capacity to serve a demand. XVI(f). Less Than Significant Impact. A gain in 12 residential units will increase the demand for solid waste disposal; however, the level of solid waste generation is small in comparison to total solid waste disposal on a regional level. The City in an effort to reduce the amount of solid waste disposed, currently provides recycling containers to residents for the recycling of paper, glass, plastic and aluminum. Waste Management, the City waste hauler utilizes the Puente Hills landfill which has enough permitted capacity to accommodate the proposed project's waste disposal needs. Less Than XVI UTILITIES AND SERVICE Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact SYSTEMS Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? C) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XVI(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. XVI(b). No Impact. The proposed project will not require the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or the expansion of existing facilities. XVI(c). No Impact. The project site is not within a flood zone area. The increase in impervious surfaces primarily due to the proposed street will marginally increase runoff from the project area. The project will be required to provide satisfactory drainage to available storm drains. XVI(d). No Impact. The project will not affect existing water supplies provided to the City. XVI(e). No Impact. The proposed amendment does not involve a project that will result in a determination by the watershed treatment provider that it has adequate capacity to serve a demand. XVI(f). Less Than Significant Impact. A gain in 12 residential units will increase the demand for solid waste disposal; however, the level of solid waste generation is small in comparison to total solid waste disposal on a regional level. The City in an effort to reduce the amount of solid waste disposed, currently provides recycling containers to residents for the recycling of paper, glass, plastic and aluminum. Waste Management, the City waste hauler utilizes the Puente Hills landfill which has enough permitted capacity to accommodate the proposed project's waste disposal needs. XVI(g). No Impact. The proposed project will comply with all federal, state and local statutes relating to solid waste. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XVII(a). No Impact. The proposed project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of major periods of California history or prehistory. XVII(b). No Impact. The project does not have impacts that are individually limited but cumulatively considerable. A majority of the environmental factors analyzed within this initial study will not have an impact by the proposed project. XVII(c). No Impact. The project does not create 'environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. Less Than XVII MANDATORY FINDINGS OF Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact SI GNIFICANCE Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Does the project: a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ( "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future ro'ects. C) Does the project have :environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either direct) or indirect) Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XVII(a). No Impact. The proposed project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of major periods of California history or prehistory. XVII(b). No Impact. The project does not have impacts that are individually limited but cumulatively considerable. A majority of the environmental factors analyzed within this initial study will not have an impact by the proposed project. XVII(c). No Impact. The project does not create 'environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. Less Than XVII MANDATORY FINDINGS OF Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact SI GNIFICANCE Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Does the project: a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ( "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future ro'ects. C) f CITY OF BALDVIHN PARK ® PLANNING DIVISION ' 14403 E. PACIFIC AVE pq BALD AN PARK, CA 91Ta6 / / . (626) 8'13 -5261 BALD P - A- tt- K TYPE OF APPLICATION . General Plan Amendment � Zwe Variance Zone Change Conditional Use Permit Cale Amendment Administrative Adjustment _ _ Development Plan Specific Plan CRA Conceptual Approval ____ Other APPLICA110N INFO - COTOration Name of ksy 2I49 E. Garvey North Address Phone Phone No. a Owner(s) of Record P N Location P AsseSSOr Parcel NU s) sus Sq p k - 00--L- Tract and Lot Nurntsegs) _- Existing Gmwal Plan Designation Existing Zoning %r each parcel o �- Existng Land Use !2� Code Section to be amended Purpose of request r /�L'/lirr ILt- /Jl S CERTIFICATION STATEMENT: llwe acknowledge the filiq of this application and c eT* that all the above inbMiatim is true and accurate and brat UWe have farrMarzed my es with fife relevant provision of the Bakhmin Park Planning giYes (Note: a as of fhe owner of re=d must cwtpleete and have notafted the attached. I .) LOCO D.C. Corporation ` Sli{3'"'c�jSF}.` it xpf -m -FOR CITY USE ONLY: File too.: Fee" Received by Date: F /Pf anning1ForTnV1.andapp .. ZONE CHANGE 1. The zone. change from 0 -I, Office Industrial to R -3(PD) Multi- Family Residential Planned Development will benefit the adjoining neighborhood by removing a blighted home and developing a vacant lot. This development can be expected to increase property values for the surrounding properties and increase tax revenues for the City. 2. The use under the current zoning, Office Industrial is inconsistent with the General Plan designation of Single - Family Residential. The property involved in the proposed change is more suited for the zone requested because the surrounding area is primarily single- family detached homes and the proposed change will enable the construction of single- family detached homes. 3. The uses permitted by the.proposed zone would not be detrimental to surrounding properties. The proposed project can be expected to increase property values for surrounding properties and generate tax revenues for the City. 4. There are no deed restrictions which affect development of the property. ZONE VARIANCE DC Corporation is requesting a Zone Variance to allow less than the minimum required guest parking stalls for a planned development. 1. There are two extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property which do not generally apply to other properties in a R -3 (PD) zone and they both relate to CALTRANS. CALTRANS has requested that 12,348 square feet of the Site not be developed at this time so that CALTRANS may take this land in the future for expansion of the 10 Freeway. Additionally, CALTRANS has request an additional 8,315 sq, ft for use during the future construction. The loss of 35% of the gross site to CALTRANS has significantly impacted our ability to provide guest parking. 2. The requested variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property similarly situated, but which is denied to the property in question because of the CALTRANS requests. 3. The granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the adjacent properties because on -site and off -site parking is adequate to meet normal demands. 4. The granting of the variance will not adversely affect the Gentu' c `' t F> ` iiv- City of Baldwin Parka JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT FRAZIER PROJECT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 1. DC Corporation is requesting a General Plan Amendment changing the General Plan designation from Single- Family Residential to Multi - Family Residential in orderto eliminate blight, increase property values for surrounding properties and change an underperforming property into a revenue generating property for the City. DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1. DC Corporation is requesting a Development Plan in order to eliminate blight, increase property values for surrounding properties and change an underperforming property into a revenue generating property for the City. 00) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DENYING REQUESTS FOR (1) AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT TO REDESIGNATE PROPERTY FROM SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO MULTI - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, (2) A ZONE CHANGE FROM OI, OFFICE INDUSTRIAL TO R- 3(PD), MULTI- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, (3) A DEVELOPMENT PLAN ALLOWING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TWELVE (12) UNIT SINGLE - FAMILY DETACHED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND COMMON LOT, (4) A ZONE VARIANCE TO ALLOW LESS THAN THE MINIMUM REQUIRED PARKING SPACES FOR A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, AND (5) A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO SUBDIVIDE TWO LOTS INTO SIX LOTS FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES (APPLICANT: D.C. CORPORATION; CASE NO.: AGP -109, Z -544, ZV -696, DR -29 and TM- 61346; LOCATION: 819 FRAZIER STREET) COUNCIL THE CITY OF OF PARK DO RESOLVE FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby find, determine, and declare as follows: a) That an application ( "Application ") for a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Zone Variance, Development Plan and Tentative Tract Map was submitted on behalf of the owners of certain real property, located at 819 Frazier Street in the City of Baldwin Park (the "Property "), described more particularly in the Application on file with the Planning Division; and b) That the Application is requesting the required legislative and administrative approvals necessary to allow the construction of a twelve (12) unit Single- Family Detached Planned Development on the Property; and c) That on December 16, 2004, a duly noticed public hearing was held on the Application by the Planning Commission, at the conclusion of which the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council deny the Application; and d) That on February 16, 2005, a duly noticed public hearing was held on the Application by the City Council; and e) That each fact set forth in the staff report presented to the City Council on February 16, 2005, is true and correct and accepted as a fact by the City Council. Resolution 2005-006 Page 2 SECTION 2. Based upon information provided, including but not limited to the Negative Declaration, the staff report presented to the City Council regarding the Application, and the testimony received at the hearing, the City Council hereby finds and determines: a. That the amendment to the General Plan and the change of zone sought in the Application would be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare; and b. That the findings required for approval of the Development Plan cannot be made since the density proposed exceeds that permitted by the General Plan and consistent zoning regulations, and required off-street parking is not provided; C. That the findings required for approval of the variance cannot be made since the Property is flat and there are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the Property involved or the intended use of such Property which do not generally apply to other single-family zoned property, a variance is not necessary for the preservation or enjoyment of a substantial property right, the granting of the requested variance would be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the adjacent properties in that it would place the developer's parking obligations on the public, and the granting of the variance would adversely affect the General Plan by promoting density not permitted therein; d. That the findings required for approval of the Tentative Tract Map cannot be made, as the Project is inconsistent with the General Plan and zoning which would be consistent with the General Plan, SECTION 3. Based upon the findings set forth above, and its legislative discretion, the City Council hereby finds and determines that the Application shall be denied. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and forward a copy hereof to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and the Applicant. MANUELLOZANO MAYOR Resolution 2005 -006 Page 3 ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SS. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK I, ROSEMARY RAMIREZ, Chief Deputy City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park at a regular meeting of the City Council on February 16, 2005, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN COUNCIL MEMBERS: ROSEMARY RAMIREZ, CIVIC CHIEF DEPUTY CITY CLERK roTi" 411111111111111 919�7 PURPOSE mum February 16, 2005 uity uouncii Agenaa Feb 162005 STAFF Item No. 1 - - 4 t_Council ) 11 munity Development This report discusses City Council consideration of a request for: 1 An Amendment to the City's General Plan Land Use Element to redesignate the subject property from Single-Family Residential to Multi-Family Residential; and 2) A Zone Change from R-1, Single-Family Residential to R-3, Multi- Family Residential; and 3) A Specific Plan with included Development Plan criteria to allow the construction of a nineteen (19) unit single-family detached residential development; and 4) A Tentative Tract Map to subdivide five (5) lots into nineteen (19) lots for residential purposes. This report recommends that the City Council deny the requests, consistent with the Planning Commission's recommendations for denial. CEQA/NOTICING A Notice of Public Hearing was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the subject properties on December 30, 2004. The Planning Division has completed an environmental analysis, and has determined that the project will not have a significant impact upon the environment. Pursuant to that AG P-1 10, Z-545, SP 04-01, DR-30 and TM-61345 February 16, 2005 Paae 2 information, a Draft Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact has been prepared pending approval by the City Council. BACKGROUND The subject property has a current General Plan Land Use designation of Single-Family Residential and is consistently zoned R-1, Single-Family. The property is irregular in shape and contains approximately 66,528 square feet (1.53 acres) of net area. The total site area is essentially flat and contains two existing single-family residences, one of which will be retained in a newly created lot and the other of which will eventually be demolished. The adjacent zoning and land uses are listed in the table below. Table 1 Adjacent Zoning & Land Use Adjacent Property Location Zoning Property Use North R-1 Single-Family Residence South R-1 Single-Family Residence East R-1 Single-Family Residences West R-1 Single-Family Residences DISCUSSION GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTIZONE CHANGE I The General Plan Amendment and Zone Change are prerequisites to the preparation of the subject property for the proposed construction of a nineteen (19) unit single-family detached residential development because the existing density under the General Plan and consistent zoning would permit only thirteen (13) units on the property. In order for the development to take place, both the General Plan designation and zoning of the property will need to be changed to Multi Family Residential use designations as those designations would permit the density required to develop nineteen (19) units on this sized parcel. This zone change will create a situation that is called "spot zoning", in that a small area of land will be zoned in a manner incompatible with the immediate single-family zoned neighborhood surrounding it. These neighborhoods are fully built out with well- maintained housing developed at densities consistent with their Single Family Residential General Plan and zoning designations. Spot zoning has been held to be illegal when the City Council acts "unreasonably or without substantial evidence" because no public benefit exists for the classification. Because the increased density provides no public benefit, but only a private benefit to the property developer, and the street width proposed to achieve the requested density will be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare, staff is of the opinion that General Plan amendment and zoning request should be denied. AGP-1 10, Z-545, SP 04-01, DR-30 and TM-61345 February 16, 2005 Paae 3 In addition to the change in zoning, the applicant is requesting approval of a Specific Plan, which includes maps and other specific criteria in a Development Plan. According to California Government Code Section 65454, no Specific Plan may be adopted or amended unless the proposed plan is consistent with the General Plan. A Specific Plan allows for flexible development standards to encourage and achieve innovative developments exhibiting a superior architecture and site design quality. Where such a plan has been approved, inconsistent development standards of the underlying zone shall be excluded and superceded by the conditions and standards of the Plan. Specific Plans must, however, be compatible with and enhance the surrounding neighborhood. Because the density proposed for this project significantly exceeds that of the surrounding neighborhood and the design of the project results in substandard street widths, this project does not accomplish the objectives of the Specific Plan Further, aside from the increased density, this particular request as it is proposed does not complement nor does it enhance the surrounding neighborhood for the following reasons: - A portion of the development is utilizing a previously dedicated portion of Kenmore Ave., which the City owns for future street expansion purposes. The dedication was accepted anticipating the need for a wider street than presently is in place. The developer, however, is proposing a narrower street in order to use the land under that portion of Kenmore Ave. to obtain the density sought. (The applicant has requested the City to vacate those portions of the street to accomplish this. If this project is approved, that request will be brought back to the City Council in conformance with the requirements of State law). - The Kenmore Ave. extension proposed by the applicant does not complement the design and direction shown on the zoning map for the proposed street. Furthermore, it does not meet the Engineering Division's requirements (reference Exhibit "D"). - Proposed Lots 5, 6 and 7 are accessed from an easement, which was previously a single-family flag lot. According to the Subdivision Map Act, easements are no longer allowed as acceptable access for such lots and each lot is required to have its own driveway access. - If the public street extension is created as proposed by this project, property owners to the east of the street extension will have new opportunities to take advantage of the newly created street frontage, should they decide to split their lots for future residential developments, but this will have a negative circulation impact due to the substandard width (30') of the street, both for conflicts between drivers and pedestrians and the lack of potential on-street parking. - The proposed density and limited lot sizes are not well integrated with the surrounding neighborhood in that the immediate single-family area provides for lot sizes that well exceed the minimum required lot area. AGP-1 10, Z-545, SP 04-01, DR-30 and TM-61345 February 16, 2005 Paae 4 ligill � 11111� 111 111 jillpill p1l I I I The applicant is proposing to construct a nineteen (19) unit single-family detached housing development. According to the plans submitted to the Planning Division, six (6) of the homes will have access from Walnut Street with the other thirteen (13) homes having access from the newly proposed 30 foot wide public street extension of Kenmore Ave. Each residential unit will have its own enclosed private open space, ranging between 472 square feet and 1,263 square feet, which will be directly accessible from within that unit. The Specific Plan also proposes that the required guest parking be eliminated which would otherwise be required for a PD overlay. According to the floor plans and elevations, all residential units will be two-story with livable floor areas ranging from 1,636 square feet to 2,173 square feet (excluding the garages and balconies) and consist of four (4) bedrooms, 21/2 bathrooms and a two-car garage, with the exception of Plan T containing three (3) bathrooms. Lot #15 will retain an existing residence that will be modified to meet the development standards proposed by the Specific Plan. The table below provides detailed information on unit floor areas (including garages), private open space areas and lot sizes: Table 2 Unit Floor Areas and Open Space Lot Number Floor Area* Private Open Space Area Lot Size 1 2,497 sq.ft. 674 2,952 sq.ft. 2 2,497 sq.ft. 955 3,269 sq.ft. 3 2,066 sq.ft. 472 2,508 sq.ft. 4 2,497 sq.ft. 512 3,028 sq.ft. 5 2,636 sq.ft. 1,045 7,878 sq.ft. 6 2,636 sq.ft. 893 3,240 sq.ft. 7 2,636 sq.ft. 822 2,992 sq.ft. 8 2,636 sq.ft. 1,035 3,400 sq.ft. 9 2,066 sq.ft. 902 2,763 sq.ft. 10 2,636 sq.ft. 831 3,270 sq.ft. 11 2,066 sq.ft. 690 2,924 sq.ft. 12 2,066 sq.ft. 678 2,850 sq.ft. 13 2,066 sq.ft. 887 3,084 sq.ft. 14 2,066 sq.ft. 1,117 3,110 sq.ft. 15 Existing home 1,263 7,888 sq.ft * 16 2,414 sq.ft. 800 3,166 sq.ft. - 17 2,414 sq.ft. 795 3,023 sq.ft. 18 2,066 sq.ft. 545 2,600 sq.ft. 19 2,066 sq.ft. 542 2,600 sq.ft. ' Includes garage square footage AGP-1 10, Z-545, SP 04-01, DR-30 and TM-61345 February 16, 2005 Paqe 5 - Building Height and Architectural Design The applicant has proposed to employ different designs and materials that will provide variety and aesthetic interest throughout the project. The exterior elevations of the proposed homes will have a mix of classic Spanish Mediterranean style architectural design. Design elements include a mixture of stucco-finished elevations, faux shutters, wrought iron and decorative veneers. Roofing material will consist of concrete tile. Although there are only five different floor plans proposed, each of the proposed units has been designed to avoid a "monolithic" appearance. The exterior walls and rooflines are staggered along both the vertical and horizontal planes. The roof and wall variations, along with the subtle changes in colors, help to visually reduce the mass and bulk of the buildings. Varying materials are utilized along the front elevation to emphasize an appealing view from the common areas. The project will involve the construction of six (6) foot high block walls around the perimeter of each unit to enclose the private open space areas. Any walls that are visible from the public right-of-way will be decorative block with a cap. Wall material and any treatment shall be subject to Planning Division review and approval. TEN TA TI VE TRA C T MAP — TM-62166 As a prerequisite for the proposed development, approval of a tentative tract map to subdivide five (5) lots into nineteen (19) lots for residential purposes is required. The Tentative Tract Map illustrates the nineteen (19) building footprints, respective lot sizes and a substandard street width and cul-de-sac. The City's Engineering staff is not able to recommend approval of the proposed street in that it does not provide the minimum standard requested width of fifty (50) feet (includes sidewalk and parkway) and cul-de-sac radius of 32'. Staff recommends that the project maintain the density at an R-1 level, which is consistent with the City's General Plan designation. The R-1 zoning designation would allow for a maximum of thirteen (13) dwelling units as opposed to the proposed eighteen (18) new units. If the density were maintained at the single-family residential (maximum of 8.7 dwelling units per acre) level it would have the following effects: i) Larger front yard areas (i.e. more privacy); ii) Wider and deeper rear yards (i.e. larger, more usable private open space areas) iii) Larger lot sizes iv) Wider and deeper lots v) Lower Floor Area Ratio vi) Less Site Coverage vii) More landscaping throughout the front yard areas AGP-1 10, Z-545, SP 04-01, DR-30 and TM-61345 February 16, 2005 Page 6 Approval of the Tract Map is possible only if the General Plan amendment, zoning amendment, and Specific Plan with included Development Plan are approved. WE= At the December 16, 2004 Planning Commission Meeting, the Commission recommended that the City Council deny all requested entitlements for the proposed development. Some of the Commission concerns are as follows: - The direction and width of the new cul-de-sac street is inconsistent with the General Plan and does not complement the Zoning Map - Density is too high. - Limited amount of usable private open space. - Potential to create unsafe conditions. RECOMMENDATION Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council: FJQZ�_�* MUM 1 That the site for the proposed development is not physically suitable for the development of nineteen (19) single-family detached residential dwelling units unless an Amendment to the City's General Plan, a zone change to R-3, and a Specific Plan with included Development Plan criteria are approved; and 2. That the design of the subdivision will create a threat to the Health, Safety and Welfare of the citizens of Baldwin Park as the project proposes nineteen (19) single-family detached residential dwelling units on lot sizes which are not compatible with the surrounding large-lot single-family residential zoning AG P-1 10, Z-545, SP 04-01, DR-30 and TM-61345 February 16, 2005 Paae 7 designations and uses and utilizing a street width which can create problems for the public health, safety, and welfare; and 3. That the Tentative Tract Map is not consistent with the City of Baldwin Park's General Plan, in that the land use designation of the subject property is single- family residential, the requested General Plan amendment and zone change will not be in compliance or compatible with the remaining General Plan requirements; and 4. That development of the site in accordance with the Tentative Tract Map will not affect future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities for the area as the natural topography of the site is flat and the future development of nineteen (19) 2-story dwelling units will therefore not affect said opportunities; and 5. That the proposed Tentative Map is in an area serviced by Valley County Water District and the District has indicated that the proposal will not violate any water quality standards for the Water District. If the City Council approves the General Plan amendment and zone change, the following Conditions of Approval are recommended. Staff will then return with a separate report to the Planning Commission requesting consideration of a Specific Plan and Development Plan. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL I 1 That the subject Property shall be developed and maintained in substantial compliance with Exhibit "A", dated January 19, 2005, except as modified herein by these conditions; and 2. That electric garage door openers shall be provided for each unit; and 3. That sectional roll-up garage doors shall be provided for each unit; and 4. That all landscaped areas must be separated from vehicular areas by a 6" continuous concrete curb; and 5. That a decorative block wall shall be provided surrounding the property. Decorative block walls with brick cap will be required along all exterior property lines that are visible from the public right-of-way and the common driveway, proposed materials are subject to Planning Division approval. Interior property line delineator walls shall be precision block with a brick cap; and 6. Each of the homes shall be provided with decorative motion sensor lights at each garage and main level entrance door. Exterior lighting shall be decorative and automatically controlled. Manufacturer's literature shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval when plan are submitted to the Building Division for plan check; and AGP-1 10, Z-545, SP 04-01, DR-30 and TM-61345 February 16, 2005 Paqe 8 7. Each unit shall be pre-wired for an alarm system; and 8. A detailed landscaping plan shall be provided indicating the size, location, and species of all trees, shrubs, ground cover, and any other plan life proposed. This plan shall be submitted during plan check phase; and 9. All Landscaping shall be automatically irrigated and a detailed irrigation plan shall be submitted during the plan check phase; and 10. That the applicant shall submit a copy of the proposed covenants, conditions and restrictions to the Planning Division prior to obtaining building permits. Said CC&Rs must be approved by the City Attorney for satisfaction with City requirements prior to issuance of such permits; and 11. That the CC&R's shall reflect that any future addition to individual units shall be limited to a patio cover which shall not exceed 25% of the rear yard area and shall meet all zoning code requirements; and 12. That all utilities shall be undergrounded. This includes utility connections to each individual unit, as well as along the frontage of the property along Frazier Street; and 13. Provide the following information upon the Plan Check submittal: A. Three (3) architectural plans and one (1) extra site plan for the Fire Department B. Three (3) complete sets of Plans for the City. C. Two sets of the following are required: i. Soil Reports ii. Structural Calculations iii. Title 24 Energy Calculations 14. All conditions of the State Map Subdivision Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance must be met prior to recordation; and 15. All conditions of the Los Angeles County Fire Department must be met prior to recordation. A written notification or approval plan from the Fire Department must be submitted to the City; and 16. All special assessments and utilities or sewer connection fees are to be paid prior to recording the final map; and 17. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including water, gas, electricity, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the respective utility companies' standards. Easements shall be provided as required; and AGP-1 10, Z-545, SP 04-01, DR-30 and TM-61345 February 16, 2005 Paae 9 18. Prior to recordation of the final map, a written certification from the Water District, GTE, SCE, SCG and Adelphia Cable stating that adequate facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed development shall be submitted to the City. The utility companies must issue such letter at least 30 days prior to final map approval; and 19. A title report/guarantee showing all fee owners and interest holders must be submitted when a final map is submitted for plan check. This account must remain open until the final map is filed with the County Recorder. An updated title report/guarantee must be submitted ten (10) working days prior to final map approval; and 20. The final map shall be based on a field survey; and 21. All surveying for the proposed development will be done by the developer, including the establishment of centerline ties; and 22. The surveyor's closure sheets must be enclosed with the final map; and 23. New boundary monuments must be set in accordance with City standards and subject to approval by the City Engineer; and 24. All easements existing prior to final map approval must be identified. If an easement is blanket or indeterminate in nature, a statement to that effect must be shown on the final map in lieu of its location; and 25. The following improvement plans, prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and drawn in accordance with the conditions of approval and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, must be submitted to the City's Engineering Division; a. Grading Plan b. Sewer Plan C. Street Plan d. Street Light Plan (per City Master Plan) 26. That the Developer shall submit a complete Hydrology study of the Project area and surrounding area affected by the development; and 27. That if the Los Angeles County Fire Department required additional hydrants or water pressure in addition to what already exists, or if the Los Angeles County Fire Department require a fire access road during construction, no building permits shall be issued by the City's Building Division (except demolition or grading permits) prior to written approval from the Los Angeles County Fire Department that either the conditions have been met or that the City may go ahead and issue building permits; and AGP -110, Z -545, SP 04 -01, DR -30 and TM- 61345 February 16, 2005 Paqe 10 28. That no grading, building, demolition or construction permits shall be issued by the City prior to the applicant having ownership of the entire site; and final map approval; and 29. Submit to the office a Soils Report signed by a Registered Soils Engineer /Registered Civil Engineer; and 30. The following off -site improvements must be existing or guaranteed for: a) Construct new driveway approaches per plan. All driveway approaches shall meet ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) requirements. b) Plant one street tree for each unit on the proposed development project. c) All parcels must have separate and independent connections to the main sewer line. d) Install water services and gas services for the development area per water and gas company. e) Provide maps in digital format to the County of Los Angeles per County requirements. f) Provide hydraulic study and design and construct storm drain for the development area if necessary. g) Provide street lights for the proposed street per city master plan, h) Obtain 30 -foot wide strip of land from APN# 8546- 004 -059 on Kenmore Street for the construction of street "A ". 31. The developer shall submit to the City Engineer the total cost estimate for bonding purposes of all off -site improvements prior to approval of the final map; and 32. All existing and proposed structures shall meet current zoning code requirements; and 33. If the City accepts approval of the final map prior to the completion of all required public improvements, the developer shall enter into a subdivision agreement with the City and shall post the appropriate security; and 34. A copy of the final map reduced to 8 '/2 " x 11 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division prior to final tract map approval; and 35. Approval of this tentative map does not constitute approval of the site plan or building footprints; and 36. The City is being served by a cable TV franchise awarded to Adelphia Cable. All residential units constructed shall be prewired and made ready for cable TV connections; and AGP-1 10, Z-545, SP 04-01, DR-30 and TM-61345 February 16, 2005 Paae 11 37. After the final map records, a mylar and two blueline prints shall be submitted to the Engineering Division at no cost to the City. Final occupancy will not be granted until the recorded map is received by the Engineering Division; and 38. Provide a copy of the final map on a disc in PC format; and 39. The vacation of 30 foot wide street right-of-way must be approved by the City Council in accordance with the procedure required by law; and 40. The developer is required to obtain a General Construction Storm Water Activity Permit (GCASWP) from the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board; and 41. The developer is required to submit a Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board approved Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) copy to the Department of Public Works for review. The SWPPP must always be kept on site and must be made available for review by the City inspection staff and the State of California Regional Water Quality Control Board upon request; and 42. An Erosion Control Plan (ECP) must also be submitted to the Engineering Division for review and approval; and 43. A Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) must be submitted along with other project plans for City approval. The project plan shall contain requirements specified by the City based on a project Standard Urban Water Mitigation Plan Evaluation Form to be provided by the Engineering Division; and 44. The approval of the proposed project shall be contingent upon provision of an assessment by a certified Traffic Engineer, of access road(s) to the subject properties. Traffic conditions shall be analyzed for the opening year. Occupancy permits shall be issued upon approval of sufficient and effective circulation at entry and exit points. In conjunction with the aforementioned assessments a warrant assessment shall be conducted to evaluate for any potential installation of stop signs or traffic signal(s) at the proposed entry /exit points. The developer shall implement, prepare submittals and pay for all costs/fees related to the Traffic Engineer's recommendations; and 45. The final map must be recorded within 24 months or all proceedings shall be terminated. AGP -110, Z -545, SP 04 -01, DR -30 and TM -61345 February 16, 2005 Paae 12 #1 - Exhibit "A" - Development Plan, dated February 16, 2005 #2 - Exhibit "B" - Existing Zoning and Land Use Designations #3 - Exhibit "C" - Proposed Zoning and Land Use Designation #4 - Exhibit "D" Engineering Division's requirements for street expansion #5 - Environmental Data — Draft Negative Declaration and Initial Study #6 - Application Form and Statements #7 - Resolution 2005 -007 Report Prepared By: Salvador Lopez Jr., Associate Planner fill EL tt$ A MO j '<2A t � 0 IT11 i i - fill -- - - - - -� b:iJ r a —� IL goo CS �8 iE od I ;, —�- ------ - -- -r.._._.. —. 0 N N�Q W << I 2 00 Ho EL 3: ® 0 e LL m,�8��g �$ �4��s� €I��QQe��i�� 9� v »ya33:nsa3s3Js�a�aEs,+r_:a dii�: sc4a�::�f�s:�s�aiy:s�_sa•.:::3i � _ � 4 � .13603 13607 13611 115 1361 1362 136 31 4047 4052 40� 4030 4045 4042 4024 4041 C. ELWYN DR 40 �� 4038 4040 4027 4035 rn 13638 4039 4036 4037 4038 4023 4016 4018 4031 < 36 361 361 361 36 136 3630 4035 D < 4011 4025 4031 40 401 403 4012 P16 4021 13601 36 361 361 3621 36 136291 4027 4005 m 4015 13637 402:3 4016 4016 BELLGREEN ST 4016 ,�� ^Y x� 49 39W 13821 4009 4 136 6 4015 I` Z 4004 .�' m ' ... :ii�� 4003 4 36 36 3608 1 362 3628 1 C, 4011 cn 4000 -i 3939 LUBICAN ST 3951 l 13603 13611 136 36 3952 3930 38 382138 138 13 T 13627 3924 3946 3923 4022 13618 122 13603 13607 13611 13615 1351 1362 136 31 4047 4030 f.4041 `x`62 4042 4033 4024 ELWYN DR 40 4040 ao3e 4o3s 4040 4027 136 36 361 361 361 36 136ollWal33CM361X361713621 13538 4039 -'< 4035 4037 4038 4023 4016 4018 136 X30 4035 4031 D 4028 4011 4025 4031 40 401 402, 4072 ^ 4012 4021 136291 4027 4005 m 4015 13637 4023 4016 4016 4016 0 CL CL 00 (0 w 44� ogoo ' iQ ! 1 44$ O naafi N co �i �� . a 0. '' N p ! (U U o�4aom 4 t N J' co ..J. J: ro U V i N a� • � wig< 0 0 cp _ ICN 4 w `* l.L '-N n mON m co r o of 4B a.e G0a �i H CO p— Om I d Nab m i/i J' �oOm —08 —� 1I1 mO �c Ss W _ N. ('!) 1 \ CJs 5'9 9 0i7/ Q 05 Og I Y 9g k i O W o S < 6L � z� b — �• /8 m e s7i 371 /or hON 09 t 091 '�. 8So 68 %Y w h h M 4Sr OM — tr•isa :�r,sso6g •s �ti N$ V LO m s o co 0B UJ co O f l t 90� al 59 0!/ 9 W 0 ooi 0 v O J Ln V b 0/1 L 09 OL oz OP %E/ 6790 of I °1P of ±T 915, : O/ _ O9Z OLb'9e o5 $ o N Li LLI u lsi t' /6l i SS< - (�'' LB m o N° A I i i- -_ - - -- ' 09 LOO OL ( k- 9b ( 0.99 co Q o oco oN (D ° U N w LO . L9 LOCATION OF PROJECT: 3940-3948 Walnut Street, Baldwin Park DESRIPTION OF PROJECT: A request for consideration of an amendment to the City's General Plan Land Use Element to redesignate the subject property from Single-family Residential to Multi-Family Residential, a zone change from R-1, Single-Family Residential to R-3, Multi-Family Residential, a development Plan and specific plan to allow the construction of a nineteen (19) unit single- family detached residential development and a tentative tract map to subdivide five (5) lots into nineteen (19) lots for residential purposes. It is the opinion of the r_j Zoning Administrator ❑ Planning Commission 0 City Council ❑ Other that, upon review of the project, it has determined that the project will not have a significant effect upon the environment. Mitigation Measures are attached 8 are not required (Signature) -Principal Planner (Title) Date(s) • Public Notice: Le al advertisement — December 30, 2004 Posting of the properties Written notice — December 30, 2004 (msw\forms\negdec) 1/97 CITY OF BALD IN PARK NEGATIVE DECLARATION BALDWIN P -A A. R. K DATE: December 1, 2004 APPLICANT: D.C. Corporation TYPE OF General Plan Amendment (AGP), Zone Change (Z), PERMIT: Development Plan (DR), Specific Plan (SP), and Tentative Tract Map (TM) FILE NO.: AGP-1 10, Z-545, DR-30, SP 04-01 and TM-61345 LOCATION OF PROJECT: 3940-3948 Walnut Street, Baldwin Park DESRIPTION OF PROJECT: A request for consideration of an amendment to the City's General Plan Land Use Element to redesignate the subject property from Single-family Residential to Multi-Family Residential, a zone change from R-1, Single-Family Residential to R-3, Multi-Family Residential, a development Plan and specific plan to allow the construction of a nineteen (19) unit single- family detached residential development and a tentative tract map to subdivide five (5) lots into nineteen (19) lots for residential purposes. It is the opinion of the r_j Zoning Administrator ❑ Planning Commission 0 City Council ❑ Other that, upon review of the project, it has determined that the project will not have a significant effect upon the environment. Mitigation Measures are attached 8 are not required (Signature) -Principal Planner (Title) Date(s) • Public Notice: Le al advertisement — December 30, 2004 Posting of the properties Written notice — December 30, 2004 (msw\forms\negdec) 1/97 1. Project Title: A request for approval of an amendment to the City's General Plan Land Use Element, to redesignate the subject property from Single - Family Residential to Multi - Family Residential and a zone change from R -1, Single - Family Residential to R -3, Multi - Family Residential. A Development Plan and a Specific Plan to allow the construction of a nineteen (19) unit single - family detached residential development. A related request is for approval of a tentative tract map to subdivide five (5) lots into nineteen (19) lots for residential purposes. 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Baldwin Park 14403 E. Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, CA 91706 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: - Salvador Lopez Jr., Assistant Planner (626) 813 -5261 4. Project Location: 3940 -3948 Walnut Street 5. Assessor's Parcel Number: 8546- 004 -078, 079, 107, 108 & 109 6. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: D. C. Corporation 2149 E. Garvey North, Suite A -12 West Covina, CA 91791 7. General Plan Designation: Single- Family Residential (current) Multi- Family Residential (proposed) . Zoning: R -1 (current) R- 3(proposed) with a Specific Plan overlay 9. Surrounding Land Uses Incorporated in 1956, the City of Baldwin Park is located and Settings: approximately 17 miles east of downtown Los Angeles. The intersection of the 1 -10 (San Bernardino) and 1 -605 (San Gabriel River) freeways lies near the southwest corner of this 6.8 square mile City. Although Baldwin Park is predominantly a residential bedroom community, recent efforts have placed a greater emphasis on promoting commercial and industrial land uses. However, the City is near "build- out", focusing efforts on the Redevelopment of land, especially within close proximity to the freeway. According to the 2000 Census, Baldwin Park has approximately 75,900 persons. This is more than double the population in 1960. Baldwin Park is predominantly a Hispanic working class community, although between the 1990 and 2000 Census has experienced a recent increase in its Asian population. Furthermore, the City has a considerably larger than average household size than the County average, suggesting increased pressure on the City's housing stock and the provision of services. Ulty of Baldwin Park 13603 13607 13611 13615 136611352 136 31 4047 x5 4042 ELWYN DR 4043 4040 4038 403e 4040 136a 136 361 13614 T,-I" 13601 Ma 36 361 351 3521 City of Baldwin Park 4033 1 4045 4024 4041 f 4035 4027 4023 4016 4018 -� 4031 � G 4025 111 JJJm 4012 4021 4015 3950 4009 4 13B21 - :3942 1�1 4003 4 City of Baldwin Park Recently, the Planning Division has received on application for 8 Specific Plan to develop 8 nineteen (19) unit single-family detached residential development. Currently, the zoning and GHDgre/ Plan designation for the subject property is R-1. SiOA|e+F8rni|y Residential. In order for the development to take p|8oe. an Amendment tOthe City's General Plan and azone change will be required to redesignate the property from single-family residential to OnU|ti-fBrni|y residential. Additionally, a Specific Plan and Development Plan are required in order for this type Of development tooccur. Project : A request for approval of an amendment to the City's General Plan Land Use E]ennond, to redesignate the subject property from Single-Family Residential to Multi-Family Residential and a zone change from R-1' Single-Family Residential to R-3, NYu|U'Fonoi|y Residential, pursuant to Sections 153.630 and 153.831 of the City's Municipal Code. A Development Plan and g Specific Plan to a/|ovv the construction of a nineteen (1S) unit single-family detached residential dove(opnnent, pursuant to SeoUnD 153.271 of the City's Zoning Code. A related request is for approval of a tentative tract map to subdivide five (5) |o1a into nineteen (19) lots for residential purposes, pursuant b} Section 152.O7Of the City's Municipal Code. ' 11. Other public agencies whose approval is required /e.g., pmrnm|ts, financing approval, or participation agreennent\ No additional public approvals beyond Planning Commission and City Council will be required for this project. 12. References The following are also referenced where appropriate in the Environmental Checklist Form: a. General Plan b. Municipal Code C. Zoning Code d. Emergency Operations Coordinator e. Geological Map—Liquefaction Zones 1\ A brief explanation is required for all anavvona' except "No |nnoac/ answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites iD the parentheses foUVvvnQ each question. A "Nn |[npaof answer in adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No |nop8cf' answer should b* explained where itiu based on project-specific factoraSvve/|aageOera/atandanjS(9.g.' the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis.) 28 All 8nnvvera must take account ofthe whole ' uCdon involved, including 0f�;�e as well as omad8, cumulative as vveU as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well ea operational impacts. 0 Once the lead agency has determined that particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact' to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross - referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiring, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. C) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures, which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site- specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: Explanation of Checklist Judgements: I(a). No Impact. The project will not have an adverse affect on a scenic vista or result in the obstruction of any scenic views. I(b). No Impact. This project will not result in the damage or destruction of scenic resources or historical buildings. I(c). No Impact. This project will not substantially degrade the existing visual character and quality of the site and its surroundings. Through the Design Review process, the project has been designed so as to ensure no aesthetic offensive site, building or mechanical equipment will be open to public view. I(d). No Impact. This project will not create any new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the residential zones. Less Than Less Than Potentially Significant Potentially Significant Less Than Significant I AESTHETICS Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Impact Mitigation Impact In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are Incorporation Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? El 11 11 C) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? El 11 d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Explanation of Checklist Judgements: I(a). No Impact. The project will not have an adverse affect on a scenic vista or result in the obstruction of any scenic views. I(b). No Impact. This project will not result in the damage or destruction of scenic resources or historical buildings. I(c). No Impact. This project will not substantially degrade the existing visual character and quality of the site and its surroundings. Through the Design Review process, the project has been designed so as to ensure no aesthetic offensive site, building or mechanical equipment will be open to public view. I(d). No Impact. This project will not create any new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the residential zones. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: II(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not convert any type of farmland to a non - agricultural use. II(b). No Impact. The proposed project will not conflict with the zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than 11 AGRICULTURE RESOURCES Significant With significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the prcject. a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? C) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: II(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not convert any type of farmland to a non - agricultural use. II(b). No Impact. The proposed project will not conflict with the zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract. II(c). No Impact. The project will not result in the conversion of farm land to non - agricultural uses. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: III(a). No Impact. The proposed project does not conflict with any applicable air quality plan. The City of Baldwin Park is located within the South Coast Air Basin which is a non - attainment area for selective pollutants. Air pollution is a regional problem. Pollution levels in Baldwin Park are a result of not only local emissions, but also of those throughout the region. III(b). No Impact. The project will not result in a cumulative net increase of pollutants for which the region is in non - attainment. III(c). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the region is in non - attainment. The Southern California Association of Governments and the South Coast Air Quality Management District have adopted a South Coast Air Quality Management Plan (SCAQMP). The proposed project is consistent with that plan and will not have a significant impact upon air quality. However, there will be temporary increases in air pollutant emissions during the construction phase. Construction dust and air pollution, however, will be reduced with the following procedures. Procedures to reduce air pollution include the following: 1) That the applicant adhere to the SCAQMD Rule 403 insuring the clean up construction related dirt on approach routes to the site. 2) The watering techniques shall be employed to partially mitigate the impact of construction generated dust particles, 3) Maintenance and servicing of construction equipment to minimize exhaust emissions. 4) Halting of construction activities during Stage 1 and Stage 2 smog alerts. III(d). No Impact. The proposed project will not expose any nearby sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Potentially Less Than Less Than III AIR QUALITY Significant Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relief upon to make the following determinations. Would the project. a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? C) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? El 11 1:1 e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: III(a). No Impact. The proposed project does not conflict with any applicable air quality plan. The City of Baldwin Park is located within the South Coast Air Basin which is a non - attainment area for selective pollutants. Air pollution is a regional problem. Pollution levels in Baldwin Park are a result of not only local emissions, but also of those throughout the region. III(b). No Impact. The project will not result in a cumulative net increase of pollutants for which the region is in non - attainment. III(c). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the region is in non - attainment. The Southern California Association of Governments and the South Coast Air Quality Management District have adopted a South Coast Air Quality Management Plan (SCAQMP). The proposed project is consistent with that plan and will not have a significant impact upon air quality. However, there will be temporary increases in air pollutant emissions during the construction phase. Construction dust and air pollution, however, will be reduced with the following procedures. Procedures to reduce air pollution include the following: 1) That the applicant adhere to the SCAQMD Rule 403 insuring the clean up construction related dirt on approach routes to the site. 2) The watering techniques shall be employed to partially mitigate the impact of construction generated dust particles, 3) Maintenance and servicing of construction equipment to minimize exhaust emissions. 4) Halting of construction activities during Stage 1 and Stage 2 smog alerts. III(d). No Impact. The proposed project will not expose any nearby sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. U|(e). No Impact. The proposed project will not create objectionable odors affecting 8substantial number of people. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: K/(a). No Impact. The project will not have any effect on any species identified by the California Department of Fish and Game or the US Fish and Wildlife Service. K/0d. No Impact. The project will not have e substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in any |000| or regional plans, policies regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Qenn8 or by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. |V(c). Nu Impact. The project will not have a substantial effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. There are nb federally protected wetlands within the City of Baldwin Park. K(d). No Impact. The project will not interfere with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites as the City of Baldwin Park is within an urbanized area and not within five (5) miles ofawildlife corridor. |V(e) No Impact. The proposed project does not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, as the City of Baldwin Park does not have any ordinances protecting trees, wildlife, etc... K/(f). No |nmoanL The project proposal wiU not conflict with any provisions of an adopted habitat conservation plan, natural COnnnnundv cOOSSnvatiOD plan or any |oo8|. regional Or state habitat conservation plan, as the City's General plan does not indicate any of the referenced plans which could be affected by the project pvopna8|. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than IV BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California El Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife C) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, El 11 11 N etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or E] f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, 11 El 11 0 or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? I I Explanation of Checklist Judgements: K/(a). No Impact. The project will not have any effect on any species identified by the California Department of Fish and Game or the US Fish and Wildlife Service. K/0d. No Impact. The project will not have e substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in any |000| or regional plans, policies regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Qenn8 or by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. |V(c). Nu Impact. The project will not have a substantial effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. There are nb federally protected wetlands within the City of Baldwin Park. K(d). No Impact. The project will not interfere with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites as the City of Baldwin Park is within an urbanized area and not within five (5) miles ofawildlife corridor. |V(e) No Impact. The proposed project does not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, as the City of Baldwin Park does not have any ordinances protecting trees, wildlife, etc... K/(f). No |nmoanL The project proposal wiU not conflict with any provisions of an adopted habitat conservation plan, natural COnnnnundv cOOSSnvatiOD plan or any |oo8|. regional Or state habitat conservation plan, as the City's General plan does not indicate any of the referenced plans which could be affected by the project pvopna8|. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: V(a). No Impact. The project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. V(b). No Impact. The project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource. V(c). No Impact. The project will not directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or geological feature. V(d). No Impact. The project is not expected to disturb any human remains. The City of Baldwin Park does not have any cemeteries. Less Than A GEOLOGY AND SOILS Potentially Significant Less Than No Impact V CULTURAL RESOURCES Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Would the project Incorporation a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial Would the project: effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of the most recent Alquist - Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? C) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geological feature? substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. El Explanation of Checklist Judgements: V(a). No Impact. The project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. V(b). No Impact. The project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource. V(c). No Impact. The project will not directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or geological feature. V(d). No Impact. The project is not expected to disturb any human remains. The City of Baldwin Park does not have any cemeteries. Less Than A GEOLOGY AND SOILS Potentially Significant Significant With Less Than Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist - Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. El 11 11 ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic - related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? C) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on or offsite landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 -1 -B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risk to life or roe ? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? VI(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects involving the rupture of a known earthquake fault. According to the City's General plan, there are no active faults within the City of Baldwin Park, therefore no Alquist- Priolo Special Study Zones are within the City. Although there are no active faults within the City of Baldwin Park, there are several major faults surrounding the City, which have the potential for causing major damage; however, the occurrence of direct ground rupture is not likely according to the City's General Plan. Potential for this type of activity is similar throughout Southern California and no unique or unusual risk is posed by the proposed project. According to the Seismic Hazard Zones Map dated 3/99 from the State Department of Geology and Mines, the project area is not within a liquefaction zone. VI(b). No Impact. The City is located in a relatively flat urbanized area with a very low potential for wind and water erosion of soils. VI(c). No Impact. The City is not located on a geological unit or soil that is unstable and could result in landslide, spreading liquefaction or collapse according to the Seismic Hazards Zone Map dated March 25, 1999 from the State geologists Office. VI(d). No Impact. The City and the project area are located on a very low to low expansive soil as defined in Table 18 -1 -B of the UBC (1997). Therefore the project will not create any risk to life or property. VI(e). No Impact. The proposed project's location does have sewers available for the disposal of wastewater. Furthermore, the soils at the proposed location can adequately support the use of the sewers. Less Than VII HAZARDS AND Potentially Significant Less Than -H AZARDOUSMATERIALS Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project. a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? C) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one- quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? El El N g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: VII(a). No Impact. The project will not create a significant hazard to the public through the routine transport use or disposal of hazardous materials. It is not anticipated that there will be any hazardous materials associated with the proposed project. VII(b). No Impact. There will be no significant hazard to the public or the environment regarding the upset or release of hazardous materials into the environment. VII(c). No Impact. The project will not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous material, substances or waste within one - quarter of an existing school. VII(d). No Impact. The proposed project is not located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous materials sites. VII(e). No impact. The project is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public airport, and therefore would not create a hazard to people residing or working in the area. VII(f). No Impact. Since the project is not within the vicinity of a private airstrip, the project would not create a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area. VII(g). No Impact. According to the City's Emergency Operations Coordinator, the project proposal will not impair implementation or physically interfere with the City's adopted emergency plan or emergency evacuation plan. VII(h). No Impact. The project proposal is within a highly urbanized area and will therefore not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires. Less Than VIII HYDROLOGY AND WATER Potentially Significant Less Than QUALITY Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: El 11 1:1 a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? C) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in El El El substantial erosion or siltation on or offsite? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount El El ED of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on or offsite? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: VIII(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements, as the facility will generate minimal amounts of solid waste typical for this particular residential use. In addition, the applicant will be required to implement the requirements of the National Pollution Elimination Discharge System (NPDES), which regulates water quality runoff. VIII(b). No Impact. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies or interfere with groundwater recharge. VIII(c). No Impact. The proposed project will not substantially alter the course of an adjacent stream or river, which would result in erosion, or siltation of the site as there is no stream or river running through the City, which the exception of the channelized San Gabriel River. VIII(d). No Impact. The proposed project will not substantially alter the drainage patterns of the City and will not alter the course of a stream or river, as there are no streams or rivers in the City with the exception of the channelized San Gabriel River. VIII(e). No Impact. The proposed project will not create or contribute run -off, which would exceed the capacity of the existing storm drain system. Nor will the proposed project provide any polluted run -off. VIII(f). No Impact. The project will not degrade the existing water quality because of the limited amount of impervious surfaces associated with the project. VIII(g). No Impact. The project proposal will not place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area. Furthermore, the City is not within a Flood Zone. Federal Emergency Management Association (FEMA) has the City of Baldwin Park classified as Zone C- 060100. VIII(h). No Impact. The proposal is not within a 100 -year flood hazard area. FEMA has classified the City of Baldwin Park as Zone C- 060100. VIII(i). No Impact. The project proposal will not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss involving flooding as a direct result of the failure of a levee or dam. Although the Santa Fe dam is located directly adjacent to the City across Arrow Highway, large -scale flooding as a result of failure of this particular dam is negligible due to the design of the dam in that water is present in the dam only a few months of the year. VIII(j). No Impact. Since Baldwin Park is an inland City, it could not experience a tsunami and the few bodies of water in Baldwin Park are small enough that they would not be able to produce a seiche large enough to cause any damage. Furthermore, Baldwin Park is an urbanized Less Than VIII HYDROLOGY AND WATER Potentially Significant Less Than QUALITY Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: VIII(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements, as the facility will generate minimal amounts of solid waste typical for this particular residential use. In addition, the applicant will be required to implement the requirements of the National Pollution Elimination Discharge System (NPDES), which regulates water quality runoff. VIII(b). No Impact. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies or interfere with groundwater recharge. VIII(c). No Impact. The proposed project will not substantially alter the course of an adjacent stream or river, which would result in erosion, or siltation of the site as there is no stream or river running through the City, which the exception of the channelized San Gabriel River. VIII(d). No Impact. The proposed project will not substantially alter the drainage patterns of the City and will not alter the course of a stream or river, as there are no streams or rivers in the City with the exception of the channelized San Gabriel River. VIII(e). No Impact. The proposed project will not create or contribute run -off, which would exceed the capacity of the existing storm drain system. Nor will the proposed project provide any polluted run -off. VIII(f). No Impact. The project will not degrade the existing water quality because of the limited amount of impervious surfaces associated with the project. VIII(g). No Impact. The project proposal will not place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area. Furthermore, the City is not within a Flood Zone. Federal Emergency Management Association (FEMA) has the City of Baldwin Park classified as Zone C- 060100. VIII(h). No Impact. The proposal is not within a 100 -year flood hazard area. FEMA has classified the City of Baldwin Park as Zone C- 060100. VIII(i). No Impact. The project proposal will not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss involving flooding as a direct result of the failure of a levee or dam. Although the Santa Fe dam is located directly adjacent to the City across Arrow Highway, large -scale flooding as a result of failure of this particular dam is negligible due to the design of the dam in that water is present in the dam only a few months of the year. VIII(j). No Impact. Since Baldwin Park is an inland City, it could not experience a tsunami and the few bodies of water in Baldwin Park are small enough that they would not be able to produce a seiche large enough to cause any damage. Furthermore, Baldwin Park is an urbanized City with no hillsides to speak of and therefore, damage caused by mudflow would be negligible. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: IX(a). No Impact. The proposed Zone Change and General Plan Amendment will not physically divide an established community but will increase the allowable density previously allowed in the single - family residential zone. The maximum permitted density for the current single- family zoning is 0 to 8.7 du /ac. The maximum permitted density for the newly created multi - family zoning will be 12.1 to 20 du /ac. This increase in density will allow for the construction of a nineteen (19) unit residential planned development provided that the development meets all standards and criteria set forth in the Specific Plan. IX(b). No Impact. The proposed project, if approved, will not be in conflict with any land use plan, policy or regulation of an agency that has jurisdiction over the project adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. Thus, not creating any conflict with the land use map (proposed to be amended) if the request is approved. IX(c). No Impact. Currently the City has no habitat conservation plans or natural community conservation plans which would possible be affected by the proposed project. Less Than Less Than Potentially Significant Potentially Significant Less Than Significant IX LAND USE AND PLANNING Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Would the project: Incorporation a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents Would the project: 1:1 El El b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general a) Physically divide an established community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? C) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: IX(a). No Impact. The proposed Zone Change and General Plan Amendment will not physically divide an established community but will increase the allowable density previously allowed in the single - family residential zone. The maximum permitted density for the current single- family zoning is 0 to 8.7 du /ac. The maximum permitted density for the newly created multi - family zoning will be 12.1 to 20 du /ac. This increase in density will allow for the construction of a nineteen (19) unit residential planned development provided that the development meets all standards and criteria set forth in the Specific Plan. IX(b). No Impact. The proposed project, if approved, will not be in conflict with any land use plan, policy or regulation of an agency that has jurisdiction over the project adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. Thus, not creating any conflict with the land use map (proposed to be amended) if the request is approved. IX(c). No Impact. Currently the City has no habitat conservation plans or natural community conservation plans which would possible be affected by the proposed project. X(a). , No Impact. The project will not result in the loss of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region or the residents of the State. There are no known mineral resources located within the City of Baldwin Park according to the City's General Plan. X(b)., No Impact: The project will not result in the loss of a locally important mineral resource recovery site, as the City's General Plan does not indicate any known mineral resources. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than X MINERAL RESOURCES Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general Ian, specific plan, or other land use Ian? X(a). , No Impact. The project will not result in the loss of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region or the residents of the State. There are no known mineral resources located within the City of Baldwin Park according to the City's General Plan. X(b)., No Impact: The project will not result in the loss of a locally important mineral resource recovery site, as the City's General Plan does not indicate any known mineral resources. XI(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not result inthe exposure of persons to or generation of noise |avgkS in exoaaa of standards established in the City's General Plan, noise ordinance or applicable standards Of other agencies. Should the project be approved, noise levels vvoukj increase h8nnponah|y during the construction phase of the project. Construction ia regulated bv the City and ia addressed in the Municipal Code to limit overall noise |gve|S to an acceptable olDg8. |nony8aed population and development will result in increasing noise from a variety of sources oornnnon/y found in an urban environment (human ootivitiea, mechanical equjprneDt, automobiles, pets, etc.). This increase io considered b]be less than significant. 0/b\` No Impact. The project will nVt result in the exposure of persons to generation of eXo»oa ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels. }{|(o). No Impact. The project will nud result in 8 substantial permanent increase of ambient noise X]k8. No Impact. The project will not result in a substantial or periodic increase in ambient noise levels above levels that exist. X](e). No Impact. The City of Baldwin Park is not located within an airport land use plan not within two miles of an airport. Theneforg, the amendment will not expose people to excessive noise levels. X|0. NO Impact. The City of Baldwin Park is not within the vicinity of8private airstrip. Therefore, the amendment will not expose people bJ excessive noise levels. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than X11 NOISE Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project result in: El 11 0 1:1 a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? El 1:1 b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? E] C) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located Wthin an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project E] expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? El El El 0 f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? XI(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not result inthe exposure of persons to or generation of noise |avgkS in exoaaa of standards established in the City's General Plan, noise ordinance or applicable standards Of other agencies. Should the project be approved, noise levels vvoukj increase h8nnponah|y during the construction phase of the project. Construction ia regulated bv the City and ia addressed in the Municipal Code to limit overall noise |gve|S to an acceptable olDg8. |nony8aed population and development will result in increasing noise from a variety of sources oornnnon/y found in an urban environment (human ootivitiea, mechanical equjprneDt, automobiles, pets, etc.). This increase io considered b]be less than significant. 0/b\` No Impact. The project will nVt result in the exposure of persons to generation of eXo»oa ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels. }{|(o). No Impact. The project will nud result in 8 substantial permanent increase of ambient noise X]k8. No Impact. The project will not result in a substantial or periodic increase in ambient noise levels above levels that exist. X](e). No Impact. The City of Baldwin Park is not located within an airport land use plan not within two miles of an airport. Theneforg, the amendment will not expose people to excessive noise levels. X|0. NO Impact. The City of Baldwin Park is not within the vicinity of8private airstrip. Therefore, the amendment will not expose people bJ excessive noise levels. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XII(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The provision of nineteen (19) residential units will increase the population of the area, which will result in higher levels of traffic and increased demands on municipal agencies. The increase in population will create a less than significant impact. According to the Population and Housing Estimates for Individual Counties from the Department of Finance, an increase would be expected to occur with an average of 4.636 persons per dwelling, which creates an approximate increase of eighty -eight (88) persons. The potential result of increased manpower and equipment needed to serve citywide demands are evaluated annually. The provision of nineteen (19) residential units is considered less than a significant impact. The zone change will not increase the population by 88 people, but rather is only a net increase of twenty -eight (28) persons (6 units) based on the sixty (60) persons (13 -R -1 units) allowed under the R -1, Single - Family Zoning. XII(b). No Impact. The proposed project will not displace any existing housing Units that will necessitate the replacement or construction of residential units. XII(c). No Impact. The proposed project will not displace substantial number of individuals /families necessitating the construction of replacement housing. Less Than Less Than Potentially Significant Potentially Significant Less Than Significant XII POPULATION AND HOUSING Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Would the project: result in substantial adverse physical impacts Incorporation Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable roads or other infrastructure)? service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for El F1 0 b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing any of the public services? elsewhere? El El El 0 C) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the C) Schools? construction of replacement housing elsewhere? e) Other public facilities? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XII(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The provision of nineteen (19) residential units will increase the population of the area, which will result in higher levels of traffic and increased demands on municipal agencies. The increase in population will create a less than significant impact. According to the Population and Housing Estimates for Individual Counties from the Department of Finance, an increase would be expected to occur with an average of 4.636 persons per dwelling, which creates an approximate increase of eighty -eight (88) persons. The potential result of increased manpower and equipment needed to serve citywide demands are evaluated annually. The provision of nineteen (19) residential units is considered less than a significant impact. The zone change will not increase the population by 88 people, but rather is only a net increase of twenty -eight (28) persons (6 units) based on the sixty (60) persons (13 -R -1 units) allowed under the R -1, Single - Family Zoning. XII(b). No Impact. The proposed project will not displace any existing housing Units that will necessitate the replacement or construction of residential units. XII(c). No Impact. The proposed project will not displace substantial number of individuals /families necessitating the construction of replacement housing. XIII(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project should not result in the additional need for new or altered fire protection and will not alter acceptable service ratios or response times. Currently Station 29 serves the City, which is located at Los Angeles Street and Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than X111 PUBLIC SERVICES Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services? El El El N N El El a) Fire protection? b) Police protection? C) Schools? d) Parks? e) Other public facilities? XIII(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project should not result in the additional need for new or altered fire protection and will not alter acceptable service ratios or response times. Currently Station 29 serves the City, which is located at Los Angeles Street and Maine Avenue. The net increase of 28 persons is considered less than significant. Whether or not the project would require additional police service or fire staff depends on the total requirements of the City and County. XIII(b). Less Than Significant Impact. Public services are already in place to serve this development. Although the project may result in some increase in police calls the net increase of 28 persons is considered less than significant. XIII(c). Less Than Significant Impact. The net impact of the project on the school facilities will have less than a significant impact. There would be an increase in local school enrollment. However, the project would only result in an estimated net increase in population of up to 28 persons with up to eleven (11) school -aged children (40% of the total between the ages of 0- 20). School impact fees collected prior to occupancy are intended to offset any potential demand for new school facilities. School Development fees in the amount of $2.14/s.f. shall be paid to the Baldwin Park Unified School District prior to obtaining building permits. These fees are considered to provide full and complete school facilities. Therefore, the net increase of 28 persons and eleven (11) school -aged children is considered less than significant. XIII(d). Less Than Significant Impact. Although residential development for this proposed project will provide an estimated net increase of 28 persons and up to eleven (11) school -aged children to the population, the project is not expected to significantly impact the City's existing parks or recreational facilities. The City's Development Tax collected prior to occupancy is intended to offset any potential demand for recreational facilities. Therefore, the estimated net increase of 28 persons and up to eleven (11) school -aged children is considered less than significant. XIII(e). No Impact. The proposed project will not require the need for new or physically altered public facilities. • •: • • XIV(a). No Impact. The proposed project is not expected to significantly impact the City's existing parks or recreational facilities. XIV(b). No Impact. The proposed project does not require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. Less Than Less Than Potentially Significant Potentially Significant Less Than Significant IV RECREATION Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Would the project. Incorporation a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in relation a) Would the project increase the use of existing vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational congestion at intersections)? ® ❑` facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? • •: • • XIV(a). No Impact. The proposed project is not expected to significantly impact the City's existing parks or recreational facilities. XIV(b). No Impact. The proposed project does not require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than XV TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project. a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? C) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? 0 Result m inadequate parking capacity? g) Conflict with adopted nolioies, plans, or programs supporting anumat*o transportation (e.g., bum mmomv. Explanation of Checklist Judgements XV(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will result inan estimated increase in traffic generated by the net gain of S residential units, which will be |*Sn than a significant impact. According to the Trip Generation Handbook by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (5"' ed.) each dxv8||iOQ unit will generate approximately 9.55 trip 8OdG per dwelling unit on 8vVegkd8y' 10.19 trip ends on Saturday, 8.79 trip ends OO Sunday with GD average of about 9.5 trip ends per day. The net, gain Of 8 [eSideOb8| units at this |0o8UOO is not substantial and thus will not require |3[g8-SC8|H physical inlpnDV8rngDtS. Approval of the proposed project shall be contingent upon provision Of8Dassessment by @ certified Traffic Engineer, of aCC8SS [08d(S) to the subject p[Opg[b8S. Traffic _ COOditiOOS shall be analyzed for the opening year. [lCCUp8DCy permits Sh8U be iSSU8d upon 8pp[OVa| Of sufficient and effective CiFCU|8dOD 81 entry and 8Xh points. In CODUOC1ioO with the 8ƒO[erDgDbOD8d 8SSeSSrneD1S @ vv8[raOt aSSSSS[DeDt shall be COOdUCtgd t0 evaluate any pDteDd8| iDSt8||atiOD of stop signs or traffic signal at the pFOpOS8d entry /exit points. The developer shall iD0p|80gDt' p[gpG[8 submittals and pay for all costs/fees related tO the Traffic Engineer's recommendations. XV8d. No Impact. The proposal will not exceed a level of service standard established by the County Congestion Management Agency for designated roads orhighways. XV(). No |moaoL The proposal will not result in a change or increase in air traffic patterns or levels that result in substantial safety risks. XVkU. NO |nlo8Ct. The proposal will not increase hazards due to a design feature or incompatible uses, GS the project doeonotino|udenevvcVnotnuobonofotreeha. XV(e). No Impact. The project will not result in inadequate emergency access. XV(f). No |nnoucL The proposed project will not have an impact on existing parking facilities or create aneed for new parking as the site meets the required parking standards contained within the Municipal Code. Private p£ddDg @ra8S contained within the required two car garages will be provided for each dwelling unit as well as guest parking. XVkz . No |rnoect The proposed project will not conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation. F� �� F� �� F� �� Fl �� ' �� m�u �� F� �� F� �� F� �� XV(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will result inan estimated increase in traffic generated by the net gain of S residential units, which will be |*Sn than a significant impact. According to the Trip Generation Handbook by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (5"' ed.) each dxv8||iOQ unit will generate approximately 9.55 trip 8OdG per dwelling unit on 8vVegkd8y' 10.19 trip ends on Saturday, 8.79 trip ends OO Sunday with GD average of about 9.5 trip ends per day. The net, gain Of 8 [eSideOb8| units at this |0o8UOO is not substantial and thus will not require |3[g8-SC8|H physical inlpnDV8rngDtS. Approval of the proposed project shall be contingent upon provision Of8Dassessment by @ certified Traffic Engineer, of aCC8SS [08d(S) to the subject p[Opg[b8S. Traffic _ COOditiOOS shall be analyzed for the opening year. [lCCUp8DCy permits Sh8U be iSSU8d upon 8pp[OVa| Of sufficient and effective CiFCU|8dOD 81 entry and 8Xh points. In CODUOC1ioO with the 8ƒO[erDgDbOD8d 8SSeSSrneD1S @ vv8[raOt aSSSSS[DeDt shall be COOdUCtgd t0 evaluate any pDteDd8| iDSt8||atiOD of stop signs or traffic signal at the pFOpOS8d entry /exit points. The developer shall iD0p|80gDt' p[gpG[8 submittals and pay for all costs/fees related tO the Traffic Engineer's recommendations. XV8d. No Impact. The proposal will not exceed a level of service standard established by the County Congestion Management Agency for designated roads orhighways. XV(). No |moaoL The proposal will not result in a change or increase in air traffic patterns or levels that result in substantial safety risks. XVkU. NO |nlo8Ct. The proposal will not increase hazards due to a design feature or incompatible uses, GS the project doeonotino|udenevvcVnotnuobonofotreeha. XV(e). No Impact. The project will not result in inadequate emergency access. XV(f). No |nnoucL The proposed project will not have an impact on existing parking facilities or create aneed for new parking as the site meets the required parking standards contained within the Municipal Code. Private p£ddDg @ra8S contained within the required two car garages will be provided for each dwelling unit as well as guest parking. XVkz . No |rnoect The proposed project will not conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation. Explanation mfChecklist Judgements: XVKa\. No Impact. The proposed project will not exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. XV|Ud.No Impact. The proposed project will not require the construction Of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or the expansion of existing facilities. . XV|(c). No Impact. The project site is not within a flood zone area. The increase in impervious surfaces primarily due to the proposed street will marginally increase runoff from the project area. The project will be required to provide satisfactory drainage to available storm drains. XV/(d).No Impact. The project will not affect existing water supplies provided to the City. XV{(e).NV |nnpaot does not involve a project that will result in e determination by the watershed treatment provider that it has adequate capacity to aen/o o demand. XV|/O. Loua Than Significant Impact. A gain in 19 residential units will increase the demand for solid waste disposal; however, the level of solid vvoabe generation is anne|| in comparison 03 total solid vvaotm disposal on 8 regional level. The City in an effort to reduce the amount of solid waste disposed currently provides recycling containers to residents for the recycling of paper, g/8eS, p/aoUo and aluminum. VV8atg Management, the City waste hauler utilizes the Puente Hills |8Ddfi|| which has enough permitted capacity to accommodate the proposed project's waste disposal needs. XVKg\. No |rnpoot The proposed project will COnnpk/vvith all federal, state and local statutes n}|Gbng to solid waste. Less Than XVI UTILITIES AND SERVICE Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact SYSTEMS Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: D a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? C) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? — f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? El g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Explanation mfChecklist Judgements: XVKa\. No Impact. The proposed project will not exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. XV|Ud.No Impact. The proposed project will not require the construction Of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or the expansion of existing facilities. . XV|(c). No Impact. The project site is not within a flood zone area. The increase in impervious surfaces primarily due to the proposed street will marginally increase runoff from the project area. The project will be required to provide satisfactory drainage to available storm drains. XV/(d).No Impact. The project will not affect existing water supplies provided to the City. XV{(e).NV |nnpaot does not involve a project that will result in e determination by the watershed treatment provider that it has adequate capacity to aen/o o demand. XV|/O. Loua Than Significant Impact. A gain in 19 residential units will increase the demand for solid waste disposal; however, the level of solid vvoabe generation is anne|| in comparison 03 total solid vvaotm disposal on 8 regional level. The City in an effort to reduce the amount of solid waste disposed currently provides recycling containers to residents for the recycling of paper, g/8eS, p/aoUo and aluminum. VV8atg Management, the City waste hauler utilizes the Puente Hills |8Ddfi|| which has enough permitted capacity to accommodate the proposed project's waste disposal needs. XVKg\. No |rnpoot The proposed project will COnnpk/vvith all federal, state and local statutes n}|Gbng to solid waste. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XVII(a). No Impact. The proposed project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of major _periods of California history or prehistory. XVII(b). No Impact. The project does not have impacts that are individually limited but cumulatively considerable. A majority of the environmental factors analyzed within this initial study will not have an impact by the proposed project. XVII {c). No Impact. The project does not create environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. Less Than XVII MANDATORY FINDINGS OF Potentially Significant Less Than SIGNIFICANCE Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Does the project: a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ( "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) C) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XVII(a). No Impact. The proposed project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of major _periods of California history or prehistory. XVII(b). No Impact. The project does not have impacts that are individually limited but cumulatively considerable. A majority of the environmental factors analyzed within this initial study will not have an impact by the proposed project. XVII {c). No Impact. The project does not create environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. m Signature Date FOR C[TY USE ONLY: File No.: Fee: Received by: Dater F /Planninp,/Form,0, ?ndapp JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT WALNUT/KENMORE PROJECT SPECIFIC PLAN DC Corporation is requesting a Specific Plan in order to subdivide two acres (87,199 sq. ft) into 19 Lots. Eighteen of the lots will have new homes and one lot, Lot 15, will require the remodeling of an existing home. 1. The project site has unique circumstances which justify the need for a specific plan. These circumstances include: a. Desire of seller to remain in existing home. b. Unusual shape of project site. c. Need to extend Kenmore Street as part of General Plan d. Unwillingness of a specific property owner to sell a portion of his property at a reasonable price to allow construction of Kenmore Street. e. Requirement to ensure access to adjacent property to permit future development. 2. This property is the logical place for the uses contemplated by the Specific Plan because the property is currently used for single family detached homes and will continue to be used for single family detached homes. 3. The proposed Specific Plan will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City because the contemplated use is consistent with the General Plan and includes implementation of a part of the General Plan, the extension of Kenmore Street. 4. There are no deed restrictions which affect development of the property. 1. The zone change from R-1 to R-3 will benefit the adjoining neighborhood by removing two blighted homes and remodeling an existing home, and extending Kenmore Street in accordance with the General Plan. 2. The use under the current zoning, single family detached homes, and the proposed use of single-family detached homes is the same. The property involved in the proposed change is more suited for the zone requested because it will revitalize the existing home, remove two blighted homes, and as a result of the construction of 18 new homes increase property values for surrounding properties and increase the tax base for the City. 3. The uses permitted by the proposed zone would not be detrimental to surrounding properfles in any way. The proposed project can be expected to increase property values .r I ia.g I operties and allow future development through the extension of Kenmore Street. 4. There are no deed restrictions which affect development of the property. M. 7 JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT WaYbRA 11054,44 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 1. DC Corporation is requesting a General Plan Amendment changing the General Plan designation from Single-Family Residential to Multi-Family Residential in order to adopt the requested Specific Plan. 00-99 IM*0111[1100jilk 11X A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DENYING REQUESTS FOR (1) AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT TO REDESIGNATE PROPERTY FROM SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO MULTI - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, (2) A ZONE CHANGE FROM R -1, SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO R -3, MULTI - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, (3) A SPECIFIC PLAN WITH INCLUDED DEVELOPMENT PLAN ALLOWING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NINETEEN (19) UNIT SINGLE - FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND (4)) A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO SUBDIVIDE FIVE LOTS INTO NINETEEN LOTS FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES (APPLICANT: D.C. CORPORATION; CASE NO.: AGP -110, Z -545, SP 04 -01, DR -30 and TM- 61345; LOCATION: 3940 -3948 WALNUT STREET)" THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby find, determine, and declare as follows: a) That an application ( "Application ") for a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Specific Plan, Development Plan and Tentative Tract Map was submitted on behalf of the owners of certain real property, located at 3940 -3948 Walnut Street in the City of Baldwin Park (the "Property "), described more particularly in the Application on file with the Planning Division; and b) That the Application is requesting the required legislative and administrative approvals necessary to allow the construction of a nineteen (19) unit Single- Family Detached Residential Development on the Property; and c) That on December 16, 2004, a duly noticed public hearing was held on the Application by the Planning Commission, at the conclusion of which the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council deny the Application; and d) That on February 16, 2005, a duly noticed public hearing was held on the Application by the City Council; and e) That each fact set forth in the staff report presented to the City Council on February 16, 2005, is true and correct and accepted as a fact by the City Council SECTION 2. Based upon information provided, including but not limited to the Negative Declaration, the staff report presented to the City Council regarding the Application, and the testimony received at the hearing, the City Council hereby finds and determines: Resolution 2005-007 Page 2 a. That the amendment to the General Plan and the change of zone sought in the Application would be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare; and b. That the findings required for approval of the Specific Plan and Development Plan cannot be made since the density proposed exceeds that permitted by the General Plan and consistent zoning regulations, and required off-street parking is not provided; C. That the findings required for approval of the Tentative Tract Map cannot be made, as the Project is inconsistent with the General Plan and zoning which would be consistent with the General Plan, SECTION 3. Based upon the findings set forth above, and its legislative discretion, the City Council hereby finds and determines that the Application shall be denied. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and forward a copy hereof to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and the Applicant. PASSED AND APPROVED this 16th day of February 2005. MANUELLOZANO MAYOR ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SS. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK 1, ROSEMARY M. RAMIREZ, Chief Deputy City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park at a regular meeting of the City Council on February 16, 2005, by the following vote: City Council Agenda Feb 16 2005 Item No. PUBLIC HEARING This item continues the public hearing that commenced at the January 5, 2005, City Council meeting. This report requests the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2005 -001, which establishes new fees and increases existing fees for police related services. The fees for the issuance, processing and filing of various police related services have not been amended to meet the rise in costs of these services since May 2000. Since that time, new City police services have been added and the compensation rates for all police employees have increased. At the current rate, police employees routinely process public fingerprint requests. The existing administrative and rolling fee for this service is $12.00. Staff recommends an increase to $15.00. This is a practical increase considering the time it takes to complete the fingerprinting and the administrative portion of the request (approximately 40 minutes). In addition, two new administrative services are now required of the police department, due to recent legislation. The first service deals with the recovery of cost for the completion of Live Scan Fingerprint Rolling public requests. This service takes approximately 45 minutes to complete. Staff recommends a fee of. $20.00. Resolution 2005-001 Staff Report Another new service allows the department to establish a fee for the release and storage of confiscated firearms. This fee is mandated by AB 2431. This allows the police department to recover the cost of processing, releasing, and storing of firearms by the police department. Staff recommends a $50.00 fee if the owner acts within the first calendar year of receipt. Staff also recommends an additional $2.00 firearm storage fee assessment thereafter in the event the owner ig'nores our requests to release the firearm(s). As a matter of clarification, firearms will only be released to owners who have acquired a California Department of Justice Firearm release form. There will be no fee charged if the firearm is reported stolen by the owner within five days of the date of theft. At the current time, the release of a firearm takes approximately one hour to process. Department staff recently completed an updated time and motion study to establish rates for completing vehicle storage and maintaining the towing program. The previous time and motion study had not been amended since May 2000, and did not take into consideration dispatch communication's time associated with vehicle storage and the time in maintaining the towing program. The processing steps and time for the completion/processing of a vehicle have increased with the added police administrative and operations procedures. The compensation rates for all police employees involved in the storage of a vehicle and maintaining the towing program have also increased. The combination of these two rates substantially increases the time and motion rates for a vehicle storage processing. Currently, the City Municipal Code allows the Department to establish a franchise agreement with a City authorized towing company. The towing company, as part of the franchise agreement, reimburses the City $25.00 per towed vehicle as allowed per California Vehicle Code § 12110 for maintaining the towing program. This rate was based on the May 2000 time and motion study and the police employee compensation rates for that period. Furthermore, in addition to the franchise fee the Police Department charges the legal owner of a stored/impounded vehicle an administrative fee as allowed per California Vehicle Code § 22850.5 for the removal, impound, storage or release of the vehicle. This fee is $90.00 for regular storage and $100.00 for a 30-day storage. The towing program time and motion study and current police and other City employee compensation rates establishes a basis for the City Council to consider revising rates for the franchise agreement fee not to exceed $52.48 per vehicle towed. The updated time and motion study and current police employee compensation rates establish a basis to increase the public administrative release fee not to exceed $113.22. Staff recommends that City Council consider increasing both the Towing Franchise Agreement Fee and the legal owner administrative impound/storage release fee. Prepared by Sergeant D. Reynoso Resolution 2005 -001 Staff Report The City Council has the discretion to accept these fees or a lower amount, so long as any one amount does not exceed the amount reflected by the time and motion studies. The City attorney has reviewed these fees and services and approved them as to form and content. Staff estimates the City's General Fund will receive an annual revenue enhancement of approximately $3,300.00 from the revision of the time and motion study, and for establishing new police services and fees associated with these services. These fee increases will recover costs associated with processing such services. Additionally, staff estimates the City' General Fund will receive an additional $85,808.80 annual revenue enhancement from the increase of the Franchise tow program and the legal owner administrative impound /storage associated fees. These fee increases will recover costs associated with processing such services: RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends City Council: 1) Review the current fees and staff recommended fees outlined in proposed Resolution No. 2005 -001; 2) Set the adopted fee schedules for police related fees outlined in Resolution No. 2005 - 001 and 3) Waive further reading, read by title only and adopt Resolution No. 2005 -001 entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK FEES FOR POLICE RELATED SERVICES." • Resolution No. 2005 -001 • Resolution 2005 -001 Fiscal Impact Attachment • Schedule of Police Compensation Rates • AB 2431 • California Vehicle Code § 12110 and §22850.5 • Surrounding Police Agency Impound /Storage Fee Survey Prepared by Sergeant D. Reynoso RESOLUTION NO. 2005-001 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK APPROVING FEES FOR POLICE RELATED SERVICES WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2005-001 generally sets forth the costs for the ssuing and processing and filing of various City services; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to revise the fee schedules relating to police related fees as set forth in Resolutions 2000-39; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was duly noticed and published on December 20, 2004. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the cost of issuing, processing, and the use of City Police Services and the time and motion rates for vehicle storages shall be in accordance with the attached Schedule of Fees and Charges, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit `A'; and Section 2. That the fee schedules and time and motion rates set forth in Exhibit `A' supercede those fee schedules provided in Resolution 2000-039 relating to Police schedule of fees and cost of Police services; and Section 3. That all fees set forth in Resolution 2000-039 that are not in conflict with those established by this Resolution shall remain in full force and effect; and Section 4. That development related fees shall become effective sixty (60) days after the effective date of this resolution; and Section 5. That the City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of the Resolution and shall cause the same to be processed in the manner required by law. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 16 th day of February, 2005. Manuel Lozano Mayor Resolution No. 2005 -001 Page 2 ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ss. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK I, ROSEMARY M. RAMIREZ, CIVIC, Chief Deputy City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park at a regular meeting thereof held on the 16t" day of February, 2005 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: ROSEMARY M. RAMIREZ, CIVIC CHIEF DEPUTY CITY CLERK Resolution No. 2005-001 Page 3 Exhibit "A" Baldwin Park Police Department Processing Steps and Time for the processing of the towing program described in California Vehicle Code § 12110 to establish a towing franchise fee Processing time for a Police Captain: 15 minutes Steps Involved in the Towing Program: Review of the monthly towing report, to include the franchise fee check, and the review of the disposition of all vehicles towed/impounded during the month Processing Time for the Chief of Police: 10 minutes Steps Involved in the Towing Program: Review of the monthly towing report, to include the franchise fee check, and the review of the disposition of all vehicles towed/impounded during the month Processing Time by the Administrative Secretary (Records Spec. 11): 10 minutes Steps Involved in the Towing Program: Delivery and deposit of the monthly franchise fee check with the finance clerk Processing Time for a Finance Clerk: 10 minutes Steps Involved in the Towing Program: Deposit of the monthly franchise fee check Processing Time for a Sr. Finance Clerk: 10 minutes Steps Involved in the Towing Program: Deposit of the monthly franchise fee check and verification of the deposit Resolution No. 2005 -001 Page 4 Compensation Rates Position Hourly Rate Benefits Total Police Captain* $50.78 $39.03 $89.81 Chief of Police $57.69 $46.64 $104.33 Records Spec II ** $15.44 $8.43 $2187 Finance Clerk* $14.66 $8.24 $22.90 Sr. Finance Clark* $19.77 $9.47 $29.24 ** = Calculated @ Hourly Rate for Step 5 Employee ** = Calculated @ Hourly Rate for Step 4 Employee Time and Motion Rates for the Processing of the Towing Program Position Time Pay Rate Cosh Police Captain * 15 minutes $89.81 $22.45 Chief of Police 10 minutes $104.33 $17.38 Records Spec II ** 10 minutes $23.87 $3.97 Finance Clerk* 10 minutes $22.90 $3.81 Sr. Finance Clark* 10 minutes $29.24 $4.87 Total Cost $52.48 All time and motion rates calculated at Pay Rate / 60 (for minutes) x Time Resolution No. 2005-001 Page 5 Baldwin Park Police Department Processing Steps and Time for the completion/processing of a vehicle storage as described in California Vehicle Code § 22850.5 Processing time for a Patrol Officer: 45 minutes Steps Involved in Handling CHP 180.- Request registration/stolen information via the radio Inventory vehicle/complete CHP 180 report Deliver report to police station Obtain and attach computer printout to report Have report reviewed and approved Log report into report ledger Processing Time in Communications: 40 minutes Steps Involved in Handling CHP 180: Obtain vehicle information from officer or citizen Complete DMV registration check and dispatch call if necessary Relay vehicle/case information to officer Telephone Tow Agency Add vehicle information to tow ledger Input vehicle status information into CAD Input vehicle information into CLETS Monitor call on CAD screen for duration of the call Processing Time by Watch Supervisor: 5 minutes Steps Involved in Handling CHP 180: Review report for accuracy/completeness Log report as approved in ledger Assist records/approve release of vehicles Processing Time in Records Section: 70 minutes Steps Involved in Handling CHP 180: Processing: 5 minutes Accept report and pull case folder Complete registration to verify report information Notification: 10 minutes Complete notification form and mail R/0, L/O and Storage facility File with case Entry of Report: 10 minutes Enter case and RIO into computer system Resolution No. 2005 -001 Page 6 Release: 20 minutes Search CAD for case number Verify R/O information and license status Get supervisor approval for release of the vehicle Complete form for R/O signature Make copy of release for R/O to present at storage facility Supply R/O with directions to storage facility Re -file report Paperwork not current: 10 minutes Send new R/O to DMV for registration update Send R/O to DMV to pay expired registration. Upon return perform release again. Telephone Contact: 5 minutes Obtain license number from R/O Search CAD for case number Obtain case and determine cause of storage Tell R/O what is necessary to obtain release Re -file report Notice of impound returned: 10 minutes Pull case to determine if vehicle has been released Mark notification form of non - release and send copy to DOJ Attach returned envelope to original storage form Re -file case Resolution No. 2005-001 Page 7 Compensation Rates Position Hourly Rate** Benefits' Total Police Officer* $40.81 $34.68 $75.49 Dispatcher $18.64 $7.90 $26.54 Police Sergeant $33.76 $27.60 $61.36 Police Lieutenant $39.91 $31.77 $71.68 Records Spec. 11 $15.44 $8.43 $2187 = Calculated @ 1.5 Police Officers = Step 4 Employee = Calculated @ Hourly Rate for Step 4 Employee Rate of One Police Officer for Reference $27.2124 $23.12 $50.33 Time and Motion Rates for a Vehicle Storage Processing Position Time Pay Rate Cost Police Officer* 45 minutes $75.49 $56.61 Dispatcher 40 minutes $26.54 $17.69 Police Sergeant 5 minutes $61.363 $5.11 Police Lieutenant 5 minutes $71.68 $5.97 Records Specialist 70 minutes $23.87 $27.84 Total Cost $113.22 Calculated @ 1.5 Police Officers All time and motion rates calculated at Pay Rate/ 60 (for minutes) x Time Resolution No. 2005 -001 Page 8 Current Recommended Adopted Police Reports: Includes crime reports, collision $20 $20 reports, clearance letters repossession forms, SDTs and log cards Photograph Copy Release $10.00 (per $10.00 (per photograph) photograph) Release and Storage of New Service *$50 release Firearms to the Public and storage fee if * Mandated by AB 2431 completed within one There will be no fee charged to calendar year reclaim a recovered firearm if the of receipt. An gun was additional $2 reported stolen, within five (5) storage fee for . days of theft. every month after the first calendar year. Police Background Service no Investigations -Civil longer provided Citation Verifications- $15.00 $15.00 equipment Violations Fingerprints: Applicant supplies cards & Service no forwards to DOJ for clearance longer provided Administrative and rolling fee for $12.00 $15.00 public fingerprint request Live Scan Rolling Fees New Service $20.00 Vehicle Impounds: Impound /Stored vehicles - release $90.00 $113.22 Impound /Stored vehicles for 30 $100.00 $113.22 days- release DUI Stored vehicle - release $250.00 $250.00 Resolution No. 2005 -001 Page 9 Current Recommended Adopted Towing Franchise Fee Per $25.00 Not to exceed Vehicle $52.48 Vendor Carts (human powered) $120.00 $120.00 Vendor Merchandise (post court $45.00 $45.00 disposition) Shopping Cart retrieval (per cart) Service no longer provided Civil Subpoena Service for *$40.00 for $40.00/$150.00 Police Officers: federal subpoenas and * Mandated by 28 U.S.C, Section $150 for all 1821 others. Bold Recommendations indicates change in fee or new service. Fiscal Impact Attachment The increase fingerprint rolling fee, the new PLiblic live scan request and the new firearm release and storage fees will provide a revenue enhancement to the City. The Department's Police Records Specialists complete approximately 25 public fingerprint requests a month. Staff recommends a $5.00 increase in this service, which could generate an additional $1500.00 per fiscal year. The public live scan request fee is a new service yet to be used by the public. This new service provides the public with a Department of Justice clearance fingerprint request for employment purposes. Staff anticipates a revenue enhancement, however, the annual amount depends upon the needs of this service by the public. The fee for the cost of processing, releasing and temporarily storing of confiscated firearms by the police department is a new service. Currently the Police Property/Evidence Bureau releases approximately three firearms per month. Staff estimates this service would generate a revenue enhancement of an additional $1800.00 per fiscal year. TIME AND MOTION STUDY: The previous time and motion study, which established a basis for police related rates for processing vehicle storage calculated the total processing cost at $29.51. The City Council approved Resolution No. 2000-039, which established a basis for the franchise fee agreement. This amount was used to implement the current Towing Franchise Agreement Fee of assessing $25.00 per vehicle reimbursed to the City. Currently, the City Municipal Code allows the Department to establish a franchise agreement with a City authorized towing company. The towing company, as part of the franchise agreement, reimburses the City $25.00 per towed vehicle as allowed per California Vehicle Code § 12110 for maintaining the towing program. This rate was based on the May 2000 time and motion study and the police employee compensation rates for that period. Furthermore, in addition to the frarchise fee the Police Department charges the legal owner of a stored/impounded vehicle an administrative fee as allowed per California Vehicle Code § 22350.5 for the removal, impound, storage or release of the vehicle. This fee is $90.00 for regular storage and $100.00 for a 30-day storage The towing program time and motion study and current police and other City employee compensation rates establishes a basis for the City Council to consider revising rates for the franchise agreement fee not to exceed $52.48 per vehicle towed. The updated time and motion study and current police employee compensation rates establish a basis to increase the public administrative release fee not to exceed $113.22. During fiscal year 2003-2004, the Police Department stored 1784 vehicles. At the current franchise rate of $25.00 per vehicle, the City received approximately $44,600.00 in franchise fees. At the proposed rate of $52.48 per vehicle imposed on the franchise fee, this would be $93,624.00, an increase of $49,024.32 (109 % increase) annually. Of the 1784 vehicles stored approximately 444 (37 monthly average) were 30- day storages that the City received approximately $44,400.00 in release fees on ($100.00 per release). At the proposed rate of $113.22 per vehicle release fee, this would be $50,269.68, an increase of approximately $5669.68 (7.8% increase). The remaining vehicles were regular storages with a $90.00 release fee. The City received approximately $120,600.00 in release fees from this service. At the proposed rate of $113.22 per vehicle release fee, this would be $151,714.80, an increase of approximately $31,114.80 (3.8% increase). The three potential increases involved with the towing program and vehicle release fees, have an approximate $85,808.80 annual revenue enhancement. Compensation Rates Hrly Rate Benefits - - Cost -- Police Ofcer (1.5) 40.8124 34.68 75.4924 Dispatcher 18.6447 -- 7 -9 26.5447 Police Sgt. 33.7607 27.6 61.3607' Police Lt. 39,91211 71.6821 Records Spec. 11 - 15.4498 8.4311 1 23.8798' Police Chief 57.6923' 1 46.64 104 3323 Police Captain 50 78961 I 39.03 89.8196 Finance Clerk 14.66 8.24 22.9000 i Sr. Finance Clerk 19.77681 9.47 29.24681 Benefits -Non Sworn - Benefits- Sworn'`* Police Ofcr: Based on Hrly Rate Dispatcher Cafe 4.03 I 4.03 City Paid Vision 0.171 - - 0.17 - - - PERS% 57.572 15.66 PIERS 14% 1.301 ER /EE Pd Wrkr's Comp 8% 2.17 . 1.49 - Disability Ins 210% 0.57 - -- 0.39 Life Insurance 0.40 0.401 Unemployment p y ment ns 0.12 - 0.121 1 - -- 23.12 7.90 Police Sgt. - , Records Spec. Il Caf6 ( 4.031 4.03i - - City Paid Vision_ 0.17 - 0.17 o PERS /0 57.572 19.48 0 PERS 14% 2.1611 Wrkr's Comp 8 % 2.70 1.231 - Disability Ins. 2.10% - 0.70 _ 0.321 _0.40 Life Insurance 0.40 I Unemployment Ins. 0.121 _ 0.12 27.6 - - 8.43 Finance Clerk Cafe - 4 Compensation Rates City Paid Vision - 0 - Hrly Rate { I_ - Benefits Cost Police Lt. Police Captain Cafe 4.03 4.031 City Paid Vision 0.17 0.17: PERS 57.572 % 2103; - 29.24! Wrkr's Comp 8% 3.19' 4.06 Disability Ins. 2.10% 0.83 1.01 Life Insurance 0.4 0.41 1 Unemployment Ins. 0.12 0.12 31.77 39.03 Police Chief - - - - -- - Sr. Finance Clerk - - - - - -- -- Cafe 6.92 4.03, City Paid Vision 0.17 0.17 - PERS 57.572% - - 33.21 PERS 14% - 2.761i(ER /EE PD) Wrkr's Comp 8% 4.61 1.58; Disability Ins, 2.10% 1.21 0.41 Life Insurance 0.41 0.41 Unemployment Ins. 0,121 0.12' 46.64 9.47 Finance Clerk Cafe - 4 4.03 City Paid Vision - 0 0. 17 I . ....... ....... M Sep 2- - -- - - ........... _. rut' -VIII UNA`i'E RELEASE September 20, 2004 04_1{}g Contact: Hallye Jordan {9 Z 6} 798 -4249 (SACRAMENTO) — Attorney General Bill Lockyer today announced the Governor signed a bill he sponsored to assist law enforcement agencies in returning firearms seized by officers. "This legislation will protect public safety and prevent gun violence by keeping guns out of the hands o f individuals who are prohibited by law from possessing them," Lockyer said. "The bill will require law enforcement agencies to take appropriate steps to determine the legal status of an individual before returning a firearm that has been seized or held as evidence by the law enforcement agency." n AB 2431 by Assemblyman Darrell Steinberg, D- Sacramento, provides a streamlined process for ensuring seized firearms are returned to owners who are legally able to possess them, and provides law enforcement agencies with policies on destroying unwanted or unclaimed weapons._ The bill codifies the California Department of Justice's (DOJ) recommended practices, which have been adapted by most of the state's law enforcement agencies. Although cun•ent law allows law enforcement agencies to return a gun without first determining whether the individual is prohibited from possessing a firearm, the DOJ has encouraged agencies to conduct background checks on the owners and enter information about the firearms into the Automated Firearms System before returning the guns. The DOi also encourages local agencies to establish procedures for disposing of firearms when the owner is prohibited from having the weapon returned. Currently, the DOJ conducts about 500 background checks a month on behalf of 300 law enforcement officers seeking information before returning seized firearms to their owners. Of those background checks, the DOJ found that about 14% of the individuals seeking the return of their guns from law enforcement agencies are prohibited from owning a firearm because they are a convicted felon, have been convicted of spousal abuse, are the subject of a domestic violence restraining order, or have been deemed to have a mental condition that poses a danger to themselves or others. In contrast, about I% of the background checks conducted on individuals seeking to purchase weapons from Iicensed gun dealers show the individual is prohibited from purchasing or possessing a firearm. (MORE) 'S- 20 2004 21'.02:33 Via Fax 6263305545 Richard LoGdrrd, Chi Page 002 Of E102 ep Page 2 AB 2431 The bill prohibits law enforcement agencies from returning firearms unless the individual has passed a firearms eligibility background check. Agencies also will be required to establish a procedure for disposing of firearms when the person from whom they are seized is prohibited from possessing them, or if the person chooses to not have the firearm returned. Under AB 2431: 0 Individuals seeking the return of their firearm will be required to obtain a firearms eligibility check from the DOJ before retrieving a firearm taken into custody by a law enforcement agency. 0 The individual will submit a request form to the DOJ that lists the serial number, model and make of each handguns the individual seeks to have returned. The individual will be charged $20 to submit the form, plus an additional $3 for each handgun to cover the costs of the background check. • The DOJ will have 30 days from receipt of the background check request to conduct the check. The DOJ will query the appropriate federal and state databases, including California's mental health, restraining order and criminal history databases. 0 The DOJ will enter all handgun record information into the California Automated Firearms System. 0 The DOJ will send a letter to the owner informing them of whether they are eligible to possess a weapon. 0 The individual will be required to present that letter to the law enforcement age cy to n retrieve the firearm, or, if prohibited from or no longer interested in possessing the firearm, to request that the firearm be sold on consignment through a licensed gun dealer. In addition, law enforcement agencies and courts will be authorized to charge a fee for storing and transferring the firearms and to destroy firearms that are not claimed within six months after they seizure. If the firearm was reported stolen, the law enforcement agency will be required to inform the person who reported the theft that the agency has the firearm in custody. The owner will be able to claim the gun only after obtaining a background check from the DOJ. There will be no fee charged to reclaim a recovered firearm if the gun was reported stolen within five days of the theft. In 2001, Lockyer sponsored legislation authored by then Senate Republican Leader Jim Brulte, R-Rancho Cucamonga, that established the California Armed and Prohibited Program (CAPP) to identify individuals who legally purchased firearms but subsequently fell into a prohibited category and did not relinquish their firearms as required by law. Since CAPP began in July 2002, the Attorney General's Firearms Division has made more than 250 arrests and seized more than 3,600 firearms, including more than 1,000 assault weapons, from individuals prohibited by law from possessing firearms. "This program has removed guns from spousal abusers, convicted felons and others deemed to pose a danger to society," Lockyer said. "This bill will ensure many of the guns never ever get into the hands of ARVINN ,.,. dangerous individuals to begin with." WAN Document Retrieval Page I of I 12110. (a) Except as provided in subdivision (b), no towing service shall provide and no person or public entity shall accept any direct or indirect commission, gift, or any compensation whatever from a towing service in consideration of arranging or requesting the ,services of a tow truck. As used in this section, "arranging" does not include the activities of employees or principals of a provider of towing services in responding to a request for towing services. (b) Subdivision (a) does not preclude a public entity otherwise authorized by law from requiring a fee in connection with the award of a franchise for towing vehicles on behalf of that public entity. However, the fee in those cases may not exceed the amount necessary to reimburse the public entity for its actual and reasonable costs incurred in connection with the towing program. (c) Any towing service or any employee of a towing service that accepts or agrees to accept any money or anything of value from a repair shop and any repair shop or any employee of a repair shop that pays or agrees to pay any money or anything of value as a commission, referral fee, inducement, or in any manner a consideration, for the delivery or the arranging of a delivery of a vehicle, not owned by the repair shop or towing service, for the purpose of storage or repair, is guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable as set forth in subdivision (d). Nothing in this subdivision prevents a towing service from towing a vehicle to a repair shop owned by the same company that owns the towing service. (d) Any person convicted of a violation of subdivision (a) or (c) shall be punished as follows: (1) Upon first conviction, by a fine of not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000) or imprisonment in the county jail for not more than six months, or by both that fine and imprisonment. If the violation of subdivision (a) or (c) is committed by a tow truck driver, the person's privilege to operate a motor vehicle shall be suspended by the department under Section 13351.85. The clerk of the court shall send a certified abstract of the conviction to the department. If the violation of either subdivision (a) or (c) is committed by a tow truck driver, the court may order the impoundment of the tow truck involved for not more than 15 days. (2) Upon a conviction of a violation of subdivision (a) or (c) that occurred within seven years of one or more separate convictions of violations of subdivision (a) or (c), by a fine of not more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) or imprisonment in the county jail for not more than one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment. if the violation of subdivision (a) or (c) is committed by a tow truck driver, the person's privilege to operate a motor vehicle shall be suspended by the department under Section 13351.85. The clerk of the court shall send a certified abstract of the conviction to the department. if the violation of either subdivision (a) or (c) is committed by a tow truck owner, the court may order the impoundment of the tow truck involved for not less than 15 days but not more than 30 days. http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-binlwais2ate?WAISdoclD=712928.5796+0+0+OkWATqn(-ti 1 /7 s /1? nn 1; WAIS Document Retrieval 22850.5. (a) A city, county, or city and county, or a state agency may adopt a regulation, ordinance, or resolution establishing procedures for the release of properly impounded vehicles and for the imposition of a charge equal to its administrative costs relating to the removal, impound, storage, or release of the vehicles. Those administrative costs may be waived by the local or state authority upon verifiable proof that the vehicle was reported stolen at the time the vehicle was removed. (b) The following apply to any charges imposed for administrative costs pursuant to subdivision (a): (1) The charges shall only be imposed on the registered owner or the agents of that owner and shall not include any vehicle towed under an abatement program or sold at a lien sale pursuant to Sections 3068.1 to 3074, inclusive, of, and Section 22851 of, the Civil Code unless the sale is sufficient in amount to pay the lienholder's total charges and proper administrative costs. (2) Any charges shall be collected by the local or state authority only from the registered owner or an agent of the registered owner. (3) The charges shall be in addition to any other charges authorized or imposed pursuant to this code. (4) No charge may be imposed for any hearing or appeal relating to the removal, impound, storage, or release of a vehicle unless that hearing or appeal was requested in writing by the registered or legal owner of the vehicle or an agent of that registered or legal owner. In addition, the charge may be imposed only upon the person requesting that hearing or appeal. No administrative costs authorized under subdivision (a) shall be charged to the legal owner who redeems the vehicle unless the legal owner voluntarily requests a poststorage hearing. No city, county, city and county, or state agency shall require a legal owner or a legal owner's agent to request a poststorage hearing as a requirement for release of the vehicle to the legal owner or the legal owner's agent. The impounding agency shall not require the legal owner or the legal owner's agent to produce any documents other than those specified in paragraph (3) of subdivision (f) of Section 1-4602.6 or paragraph (3) of subdivision (e) of Section 14602.7. The impounding agency shall not require any documents to be notarized. Page I of I httD://vr,,vw.leginfo.ca.gov/cpi-bin/w,qig(ynfp.?WATqtir)r,ln=71 ?77,1570A-�-(,4-0-4-ORIkV A T'Qnnf, 1 /1) 1Z /1) () f) 4Z Surrounding Police A(eney Impound /Storage Fee Survey Release Fees Impound /Storage Release 30 -Day Release Fees DUI Release Fee Azusa P.D $60.00 $60.00 $178.00 Claremont P.D $124.25 $12425 $1.24.25 Covina P.D $60.00 $60.00 (&- Time & Motion rate El Monte I'D $ 120.00 $120.00 $340.00 Glendora P.D _ $60.00 $60.00 $60.00 Irwindale P.D $50.00 $150.00 $350.00 Ontario P.D $125.00 $125.00 $125.00 Pomona P.D $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 Monrovia P.D $90.00 $110.00 $275.00 Average Fees $87.69 $101.02 $194.03 BPPD Fees $90.00 $1.00.00 $250.00 BPPD $113.00 $113.00 $250.00 Recommended Fees Survey Completed by Sgt. D. Reynoso 1 -10 -05 City Council Agenda Feb 16 2005 Item No. I & The City Council is requested to: ■ Hold a public hearing to for the City's proposed Fiscal Year 2005-2006 CDBG and HOME funding as required by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. ■ Consider using projected CDBG Program Income as part of the 15% Public Service maximum allocation restriction. ■ Consider the approval of the proposed FY 2004-2005 CDBG Public Service activities. i 7-11 mrfe- • NW% On January 5, 1995 The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) established the Final Rule for Consolidated Submission for Community Planning and Development Programs. Essentially, the Federal government established a requirement that all state and local governments prepare a five-year strategy designed to address the housing needs of extremely low, low and moderate-income households within the community. Local governments are only provided federal funds when they prepare a five-year Consolidated Plan and obtain approval from HUD. Also required is the submission • a City's Annual Action Plan to be submitted 45 days prior to the beginning of the fiscal year. The Annual Action Plan (Plan) describes the proposed funding amounts and activities to be undertaken for the new program year. This year, the FY 2005-2006 Annual Action Plan and FY 2005-2010 Five Year Consolidated Plan will be due to HUD • May 15, 2005. Public Hearing Re: Use of FY 05/09 Federal CDBG & HOME Investment February 16, 2005 Page 2 of 3 For FY 2005-2006, the City of Baldwin Park expects to receive $1,702,938 in Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, $537,657 in HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) funds, $150,000 in CDBG projected Program Income, and $150,000 in HOME projected Program Income. Of the $1,702,938 Entitlement and $150,000 in projected Program Income for CDBG funding, 15%, approximately $277,941, may be allocated to Public Service Agencies. The agencies must provide services to the residents of the City of Baldwin Park and be able to document that at least 51 % of the clientele served by the program is considered low to moderate income as defined by HUD. Under consideration during this public hearing is the projected use of these funds. On December 9, and December 23, 2004, a Public Notice was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune informing the community of the availability of CDBG and HOME funds for the purpose of requesting proposals by public service organizations. The Public Notice also provided information regarding the scheduled community meetings to be held on January 6, February 3 and February 16, 2005. On January 6 and February 3, 2005, the Joint Housing and Community Services Commission, who form the CDBG Advisory Committee, held community meetings at the Esther Snyder Community Center. At those meetings, the Commission heard presentations by public service agencies requesting funds from the City. Based on their review of services being offered by interested agencies, Joint Commission made recommendations regarding funding for Public Service Agencies (Please see Attachment "A" — Commission/Committee Recommendations and Attachment "B" - Commission/Committee Minutes from January 6 and February 3, 2005), On February 7, 2005, an additional Public Notice was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune for the purpose of informing residents of the Public Hearing scheduled for February 16, 2005 providing them with opportunity to comment on the activities and priorities to be considered in the development of the FY 2005-2006 Annual Action Plan to be submitted to HUD by May 15, 2005. On April 5, 2005, a Public Notice will also be published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune notifying the community of the opportunity to comment on the Draft FY 2005- 2006 Annual Action Plan. The required 30-day comment period will begin on April 4, 2005 and conclude with a second Public Hearing before the City Council on May 4, 2005. During this 30-day public comment period, the draft Plan will be available for review at the Baldwin Park Public Library, the City Clerk's office located on the 2nd floor in City Hall and the Housing Department located at 4141 N. Maine Avenue. DISCUSSION As stated above, approximately $277,941 of FY 2005-2006 CDBG funds may be allocated to public service agencies. However, the $227,941 includes 15% of FY 2005- 200• program income projected at $150,000. Program income is generated through the repayment of rehabilitation loans and varies from year to year. Public Hearing Re: Use of FY 05/09 Federal CDBG & HOME Investment February 16, 2005 Page 3 of 3 While it is eligible to include the estimated program income when calculating the amount available to be allocated for public service agencies, it can result in an audit finding from HUD if the estimated program income was not generated. However, based on the previous amounts of program income, which averages $198,000 for the past three years, and the current activity in the housing market with refinancing and home sales, staff is comfortable with the projected program income of $150,000 for FY 2005-2006. The City Council has the option to include the estimated Program Income of $150,000 to its Public Service Cap. If the City Council elects not to include the program income, the amount available to allocate to public service agencies will be reduced to $255,441, which is less than the amount deliberated by the Joint Commission. The recommendations from the Comm ission/Committee include the estimated Program Income. For complete details regarding the Comm ission/Committee's recommendations please refer to the attached minutes from the meetings of January 6 and February 3, 2005 meetings. The program description of each public service agency application is also attached for your review. (Please see Attachment "C") Proposed HUD Reductions As part of the 2005-2006 Federal Budget, President Bush is proposing to reduce CDBG funds by up to 50%. The amounts identified in this staff report were generated by HUD. If the CDBG entitlement allocations are reduced by 20% or less, program income generated may be sufficient to cover the reduction. However, if HUD reduces its annual allocations in October 2005, staff will bring the CDBG budget back to the City Council for reconsideration and reallocation of funds for FY 2005-2006 budget year. N zKol LTAI Following the public hearing, it is staffs recommendation that the City Council: • Consider the approval of the proposed FY 2004-2005 CDBG Public Service activities as presented in Attachment "A". ■ Receive and file the minutes of the Joint Commission/CDBG Advisory Committee meetings of January 6 and February 5, 2005 in Attachment "B". Aftachments Attachment "A" - Joint Commission/CDBG Advisory Committee Recommendations (PSA's) Attachment "B" - Joint Commission/CDBG Advisory Committee Minutes Attachment "C" — Public Service Applications/Program Descriptions e 0 e f 1 T- Q U I� ° N N EA O C O O ml O H s i rr�l \:LJ co p� Cl) � N Jd I NT ®i LO �K® 4 1 .a+ 1 [� ta 1 w. O 1 1 0 1 LO � N �- CN M IT LO (.D ice- W Q-) (D m Q U) Cv 1` W 0 N O � �+ O Q V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O 6H �- d O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O r ep 00 LO to O m 0 LO O � O O to O 0) _, 0 4, tf h N h I- N M N O N O V � y E N1 O E O U V O O CO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O d' L O CO O O O O O O O O N O 0 0 L C M CD LO 1` O h O h LO O V) O O O O O c1 to r- DD O IT M tP 00 CO M — N — — M CO N In w O i LL lu UH1 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0— 0 cc r 0 0 O O O O O O O 00 O O Lo O cc Lj) r C 0 0 O O O O to O O Lr L O Ui O r Lo 00 LO O Cl) 0 O M M 1` ti O O M rP Ln M d' a) = N y_O V ® L L L CO i U N' O Z O d O O O O H>4 C E O ,r O V a'rW Q L = +: Z O O O O as O E w w m .� _ ' d IL 'O E �. L6. W p® O o ®% v (n W 0 LL U ®$ U O a) a w � U) W w v U a) y 0 (n r 0 U) ICL - Vo S O �' a o O w d mUU U�-C7 �'UUw�°-daa��n,n�rrzt- W gn �- CN M IT LO (.D ice- W Q-) (D m Q U) Cv 1` W Meeting of the Joint Commission /CDBG Advisory Committee MINUTES January 6, 2005 The Regular Joint Meeting of the Baldwin Park Joint Commission /CDBG Advisory Committee was held on January 6, 2005, at the Esther Snyder Community Center, 4100 Baldwin Park Boulevard, Baldwin Park, CA 91706. Meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Members Present: Margarita Vargas, Oscar Marin, Ruth Davila, Rose Acosta, Mario Ventura, Ana Lujan, Martha Reyes, Irma Tarango, Greg E. Conde, George Camacho, Ralph Galvan, Candace Orosco Members Absent: Marisela Weil, Rita P. Vasquez Others Present: Council Member David J. Olivas, Director of Recreation and Community Services Manuel Carrillo, Housing- Programs Coordinator Suzie Ruelas, Programs Coordinator Helen Hernandez, and Administrative Clerk II Nancy Garcia APPROVAL OF CERTIFICATE OF AGENDA POSTING FOR January 6, 2005 A motion was made to approve the Certificate of Posting for January 6, 2005. M /S /C: Galvan /Conde Motion Carried APPROVAL OF MINUTES None UNFINISHED BUSINESS None NEW BUSINESS a. Selection of Chairperson and Vice Chairperson Nominations were received for the Joint Commission /CDBG Advisory Committee Chairperson. Commissioner Tarango nominated Commissioner Vargas for Chair. In response to Commissioner Marin's nomination, Commissioner Galvan declined his nomination for Chair. A motion was made to approve Commissioner Vargas as Chairperson for the Joint Commission /CDBG Advisory Committee. M /S /C: Lujan/Tarango Motion Carried Nominations were received for the Joint Commission /CDBG Advisory Vice Committee Chairperson. Commissioner Vargas nominated Commissioner Tarango and Commissioner Marin nominated Commissioner Galvan for Vice Chair. After votes were received and tallied, Commissioner Tarango was elected Vice Chair to the Joint Commission /CDBG Advisory Committee. Motion Carried b. Overview of Community Development Block Grant Consolidated Plan Process Housing Programs Coordinator Ruelas presented the Commission /Committee with a PowerPoint presentation providing an overview of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding process. The following topics were covered: • Oversight of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), and HOME Investment Partnership (HOME) Funds including the creation of the CDBG 5 -Year Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan. • The Five Year 2005 -2010 Consolidated Plan and FY 2005 2006 Annual Action Plan are due to HUD on May 15, 2005. • The importance of citizen input and participation through Joint Commission /CDBG Advisory Committee meetings. • Examples of programs funded with CDBG and HOME Funds such as street and sidewalk improvements, storm drain projects, construction of the Teen Center, First Time Homebuyer and Rehabilitation Programs, and Public Service Agencies. • Recommendations from the Commission /Committee for Public Service funding will be presented to the City Council. Housing Programs Coordinator Ruelas informed the Commission /Committee that in an effort to have sufficient time to create the Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan, Director of Community Development and Housing Wong requests that the recommendations for funding be completed by February 3, 2005. Housing Programs Coordinator Ruelas stated that Director Wong also requests that the Commission/Committee consider a minimum limit of funding allocated to public service agencies. Because Federal allocations awarded to agencies require a great deal of paper work and documentation for the agency and staff, the low amounts of allocations are not always sufficient or effective enough for this extra workload. In response to Chair Vargas' concerns with this recommendation, Housing Programs Coordinator Ruelas stated that this item could be discussed at the next meeting. Housing Programs Coordinator Ruelas informed the Commission/Committee that they would be receiving the FY 2005-2006 Public Service Agency applications by January 24, 2005. If any applications require additional documentation, these applications will be sent separately once everything is received. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, MEMBERS, COMMISSIONERS, OR COMMITTEES- NONE ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Programs Coordinator Helen Hernandez informed the Commission /Committee that the Community Services and Recreation Department would be requesting funds for the following programs: • Child Care Subsidy • City Wide Computer Lab • Family Service Center ■ Youth Employment • Camp Everest ■ Sports Scholarship Executive Director of the Down Syndrome Association of Los Angeles Gail Williamson informed the Commission /Committee that their association is requesting funding to provide outreach services for residents with children, minors and/or adults diagnosed with Down Syndrome. Project Sister Education & Outreach Coordinator Bernie Dillon thanked the Commission /Committee for last year's funding and provided an overview of services provided to date. She also informed the Commission/Committee that Project Sister is requesting funds for FY 2005-2006. Rev. Elmer Jackson representing CEH Recovery Services stated that their organization provides a residential drug and alcohol rehabilitation program and would be requesting funds for FY 2005 -2006. He also stated that CEH would be increasing their request due to an increase in their monthly rent for the units that house their clients. Council Member Olivas introduced himself and thanked the Joint Commission for their attendance. He also reminded them of the importance of their participation as representatives for all the residents of the City of Baldwin Park. ADJOURNMENT A motion was made to adjourn the meeting. M /S /C: Reyes/Tarango Motion Moved. Meeting was adjourned at 6:00 PM The foregoing minutes were approved as at the Joint Commission /CDBG Advisory Committee meeting of ATTEST: Nancy Garcia Chair Vargas Administrative Clerk II CDBG Advisory Committee Meeting of the Joint Commission/CDBG Advisory Committee TA Iff T1 [gym February 3, 2004 The Regular Joint Meeting of the Baldwin Park Joint Commission/CDBG Advisory Committee was held on February 3, 2005 at the Esther Snyder Community Center, 4100 Baldwin Park Boulevard, Baldwin Park, CA 91706 Meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Members Present: Oscar Marin, Mario Ventura, Margarita Vargas, Ruth Davila, Ana Lujan, Martha Reyes, Irma Tarango, Greg E. Conde, Ralph Galvan, Candace Orosco Members Absent: Marisela Weil, Rosa Acosta, Rita Vasquez, George Camacho Others Present: CDBG Coordinator Suzie Ruelas, Programs Coordinator Helen Hernandez, and Administrative Clerk 11 Nancy Garcia APPROVAL OF CERTIFICATE OF AGENDA POSTING FOR February 3, 2005 A motion was made to approve the Certificate of Posting for February 3, 2005. M/S/C: Reyes / Lujan Motion Carried APPROVAL OF MINUTES A motion was made to approve the minutes for January 6, 2005. M/S/C: Reyes / Lujan UNFINISHED BUSINESS-NONE None NEW BUSINESS The following Public Service Agencies presented their proposals before the Baldwin Park Joint Commission/CDBG Advisory Committee. 1. Alicia Cardenas representing Santa Anita Family Service stated that there agency provides services to the Seniors & Disabled Adults. Their services include the following: • Information and Referral • Comprehension Assessment • Care Management • Home Chore • Personal Care • Light Housekeeping 2. Paul Hebblethwaite representing Project ACHIEVE stated that there agency currently provides services to families and individuals throughout the San Gabriel Valley who are homeless. Their primary tool for helping homeless and low-income individuals and families is to achieve and sustain self-sufficiency. 3. Bernie Dillon representing Project Sister stated that their agency assists victims of Sexual Assault Crisis and Prevention Services. Their mission is to reduce the trauma and risk of sexual violence and child abuse. They provide a 24-hour hotline, accompaniment/advocacy services and counseling for individuals and groups. The counseling hours primarily include services to the students in a group program at Sierra Vista High School, although other eligible resident of Baldwin Park who have experience sexual violence or child abuse may receive counseling as well at no extra cost. 4. Executive Director of the Down Syndrome Association of Los Angeles Gail Williamson informed the Commission/Committee that their association is requesting funding to provide outreach services for residents with children, minors and/or adults, diagnosed with Down Syndrome. The agency was able to verify that there are currently 6 families from Baldwin Park listed with their agency and 57 families with Down Syndrome children not yet listed. Their goal is to begin assisting the 6 families and reach out to the other 57. 5. Programs Coordinator Helen Hernandez informed the Comm ission/Committee that the Community Services and Recreation Department is requesting funds for the following programs: • Child Care Subsidy • City Wide Computer Lab • Family Service Center ■ Youth Employment • Camp Everest ■ Sports Scholarship 6. CDBG Coordinator Ruelas stated that through staff's oversight, the City's Graffiti Removal and PRIDE Platoon administrators were not informed of this meeting. However, she provided the following information regarding each program: Graffiti Removal: ® Abated over 50,000 Graffiti hits citywide * 25% (12,500) of those abated were in CDBG eligible areas ■ The request for an increase in funding amount is to reflect 25% of the program's total budget ■ 45 Youth were assisted with last year's funding • Program was recently made available to Jr. High School Age Youth • During the City Council meeting on February 2, 2005, Holland Jr. High Principal Mr. Cruz thanked the City for the program stating that the program has made a noticeable positive impact to the youth that have participated. ■ The request for an increase in funding is to meet the demand to provide more boot camps ■ In response to Commissioner Marin's concern with salary charges reflected as overtime in the application, CDBG Coordinator Ruelas stated that overtime charges are not eligible and salary will be based on a regular hourly rate for this project. 7. CDBG Coordinator Ruelas informed the Commission /Committee that Colleen Castellano, with the East San Gabriel Valley Coalition for the Homeless, phoned stating the she had every intention of making a presentation at this meeting. However, she was in Los Angeles with car problems. She asked that her appreciation of the funds allocated to this program for the past few years be expressed and that the Commission/Committee be informed of the need for funding this organization. b. Minimum Limit Amount of Annual Allocatiori CDBG Coordinator Ruelas reminded the Comm ission/Committee of the request by Director Jack Wong to consider setting a minimum limit of funding allocated to public service agencies. Because Federal allocations awarded to agencies require a great deal of documentation for the agency and staff, the low amounts of allocations are not always sufficient or effective enough for this extra workload. In response to Commissioner questions, CDBG Coordinator Ruelas stated that although in past years the City had received approximately $1.8 million in CDBG funds, HUD has been reducing the amount of funding to all jurisdictions for the past three years. This year, the City is expected to receive an estimate $1.7 million. Thus, requiring the City to reduce its amount available to fund public service agencies. She reminded the Comm ission/Committee of the public service cap of 25% of the annual entitlement and the option to include the estimated program income. The program income for FY 2005-2006 is estimated at $150,000. Including the estimated program income, the total amount of available funding is $277,941. A motion was made to not set a minimum limit of funding allocated to the public service agencies M/S/C: Reyes / Lujan c. Funding Recommendations for CD1BG FY 2005-2006 Public Service Agencies The following items were discussed / mentioned: CDBG Coordinator Ruelas informed the Commission/Committee that based on the FY 2000-2005 Five Year Consolidated Plan the City has not meet it's goal in regards to the Number of Youth Assisted and Food Services provided to the low Income individuals/families. Based on those objectives, it is imperative that the City continue to provide CDBG funds to youth and food service programs to meet the goals submitted to HUD in the Five Year Plan. It was the consensus of the Commission /Committee that due to the reduced amount of available funding, funds would be allocated to one drug prevention/treatment agency this year. The Commission/Committee elected to fund CEH Recovery. This decision was based on the past history with CEH providing excellent services and because CEH is located in Baldwin Park which makes it more convenient for Baldwin Park residents to receive assistance. The Commission/Committee also appreciates how CEH is very active in the Community. It was also the consensus of the Commission/Committee that funds would be allocated to one homeless service agency this year. Although the Commission/Committee is aware that Project ACHIEVE in El Monte and the East San Gabriel Coalition has similar services, they decided to fund the East San Gabriel Coalition due to their significant Winter Shelters, years of experience and continued services and outreach to the Homeless individuals/families in the City of Baldwin Park. The Commission/Committee elected to fund the Crystal Cuevas Down Syndrome as a result of not having a Public Service Agency to assist the Disabled for the past 2 years. Although the five-year goal for assistance to the disabled has been met, the Commission/Committee felt there was still a need to for this program. During the recommendation process the Commission/Committee decided not to fund the Parents Place Family Resource Center because they felt the School District's current special education programs are successful and sufficient enough to meet the needs of the residents. In order to have sufficient funding for the Santa Anita Family Service, the Commission /Committee decided to reduce allocations from the following City Programs, BPPD Pride, Childcare Subsidy, Family Service Center, Sports Scholarships and Youth Employment. They felt that the Santa Anita Family Service Center has been a reliable organization to the many Baldwin Park senior citizens residents. REPORTS OF OFFICERS MEMBERS COMMISSIONERS OR COMMITTEES - CDBG Coordinator Ruelas notified the Commission /Committee that due to an unscheduled vacancy on the Housing Commission, the City of Baldwin Park is accepting applications. She requested the Commission /Committee to assist in seeking residents who might be willing to submit an application for the Housing Commission. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS CDBG Coordinator Ruelas thanked the Commission /Committee for their participation as representatives of the residents during- this process. She also encouraged the Commission /Committee to attend the February 16, 2005 Council Meeting. ADJOURNMENT A motion was made to adjourn the meeting. M /S /C: Tarango / Reyes Motion Moved. Meeting was adjourned at 7:30 PM The foregoing minutes were approved as at the Joint Commission /CDBG Advisory Committee meeting of ATTEST: Nancy Garcia Chair Vargas Administrative Clerk 11 CDBG Advisory Committee City of Baldwin Park Housing Department FY 2005-2006 Community Development Block Grant Funds Request for Funds Contact Person: David Reynoso, Phone Number/Ext. 626 813-5235 (Previous Year Allocation): CDBG Amount Requested: $45474.00 Other Funds: $ Total: $45474.00 (Please attach a copy of your proposed budget) Project Name: PRIDE Platoon At-Risk Juvenile Boot Camp Project Description: The Baldwin Park Police Department is requesting funding for two at risk juvenile boot camp programs. This program is designed to provide at risk youth with proactive and innovative techniques for positive redirection. The nine session eight week long program is designed for middle school and high school students. The program uses professionals from varying fields to act as role models and provide the youth with a variety of choices and examples of the results of good conduct. The program is facilitated by Baldwin Park Police Officers. The program starts with one two day overnight outing and continues with eight hour sessions for seven Saturdays thereafter. Community Development Grants funded one boot camp class each of the last two years. With the success of the boot camp class, the need and demand for future classes by the public is great. We recently turned away 45 students and their families due to lack of funds for an additional middle school boot camp program this school year. The majority of the families are low income and we are proud to be able to provide this program at no cost to them. The Baldwin Park Police Department has worked in conjunction with the Baldwin Park Unified School District to fund other Boot Camp classes. The funding will significantly be reduced in the 2005-2006 school year, limiting us to one or two programs. Our goal is to complete four Boot Camp programs during the school year. Community Development Block Grant Funds can assist us in meeting this community goal. Our department staffing levels do not allow any of the officers to work the program as part of their normally assigned duties. The only way our department can staff the boot camp program is on an overtime basis for the officers. I have attached invoices from one of our previous classes to show the cost of one Boot Camp Class for approximately 45 students to be $22737.33. This costs includes all meals, uniforms, insurance and other supplies for the students and the officer's salaries. I also attached testimonials written by previous students and the curriculum from the most current class. Projected Number of Beneficiaries Served: Individuals or 45 Households , 0 7J ---- --- ---- City of Baldwin Park f6�7 Housing Department FY 2005-2006 Community Development Block Grant Funds Request for Funds Contact Person: Manuel Carrillo, Jr. Phone Number/Ext. (626) 813-5269 (Previous Year Allocation): 0 CDBG Amount Requested: $7,500.00 Other Funds: $8,515.00 General Fund Total: $16,015.00 (Please attach a copy of your proposed budget) Project Description: The Camp Everest program is for members of the community who are between the ages of 8 years to 17 years of age. The Camp Everest Resident Camp is a weeklong program (6 Days) held in the Wrightwood area of the San Bernardino Mountains. The purpose of the program is to guide and safeguard children in their exploration of nature. The program provides a healthy, happy, secure, and creative environment for children to experience "time away at camp." Camp Everest also provides an atmosphere of caring and trust for the participants to form a brother /sisterhood, with their cabin mates. Program activities consist of educational activities, recreational opportunities, social/emotional activities, enrichment activities, and time in the openness of nature. For many participants this is the only opportunity they have to go camping, and also their first trip away from home for a significant amount of time. Staff is re guesting a grant in the amount of $7,500 to offset costs for Camp Everest. The $7,500 allocation will allow for scholarships to participants who are low to moderate income and could provide proof of residence and income verification. The entire allocation will be used to provide assistance for the cost of attendance. Recreation will absorb the remaining costs which include camp supplies, printing, registration, transportation to and from camp as well as the administration of the program_ Projected Number • Beneficiaries Served: 75 Individuals • Households WIMM• For Housing Department Use Only., Recommendation: ApprovedFl Deny $ Comments: Reviewed B Approved., V E "D ------- - ------ JAN 13 2005 10W;1N( A(1010141)y Contact Person: Manuel Carrillo Jr. Phone Number /Ext. (626) 813 -5269 (Previous Year Allocation): $30,000.00 CDBC Amount Requested: $30,000.00 Other Funds: 16,598.40 General Fund Total: $46,598.40 (Please attach a copy of your proposed budget) Project Description: This program provides working parents with financial assistance to offset the cost of child care services Parents and participants must be Baldwin Park Residents to qualify for the subsidy, and meet low to moderate - income levels. Parents are allowed to select a childcare center of their choice to enroll their children as long as the care provider is licensed or a City operated program Scholarships are set on a sliding scale based on the number of children and the total amount paid for the childcare services as well as total family size and income. To participate in the program parents are required to provide proof of address and income verification. To date there are 125 children participating in the program This year we have exhausted over $8,000.00 by December 2004. We are on target to exhaust the funds allocated. The Department of Recreation and Community Services would like to request the same amount of $30,000 to assist the department in funding participating families for the full twelve -month cycle in FY 05 -06 The entire amount of $30,000 goes directly to participating families and the department absorbs the remaining costs and /or expenses for utilities materials and supplies, building maintenances outside printing expenses and part time staffing. Reviewed Approved JAN 1 3 2005 City of Baldwin Park 4� 4 -Housing Department FY 2005-2006 Community Development Block Grant Funds Request for Funds Contact Person: Manuel Carrillo, Jr. Phone Number/Ext. (626) 813-5269 (Previous Year Allocation).NIA CDBG Amount Requested: $7,636.00 Other Funds: $17,290.00 General Fund Total: $24,926.00 (Please attach a copy of your proposed budget) Name of Project: Community Center —Computer Lab Project Description: The Computer Lab at the Community Center offers introductory classes to community at a reduced cost. Currently a Part-time Instructor who has an extensive background working with children and adults, teaches the fundamentals of computer navigation and supervises the class. The pro-gram consists of various classes that offer computer recreation programs, and services to a low to moderate-income area. Homework assistance, Internet Navigation, and basic how to's of a computer are just a few of the benefits of having this program. The requested funding will cover the cost of the lease of the computers, while the department will absorb the staffing costs, materials and supplies, outside printing, advertising, and administration costs. Projected I Number of Beneficiaries Served: 1664 Individuals or Households Estimated Project Completion Date: Year —round project July 1 -June 30. For Housing Department Use Only. Recommendation: Approved Deny= Comments: Reviewed B 2 Approved; RECENED JAN 1 3 2005 AU I I 1()I it I Y 4 11 N "AA NI AVL BAU llVvtrj 'AnK. CA 91706 City of Baldwin Park lid Housing Department FY 2005 -2006 Community Development Block Grant Funds Request for Funds`, Contact Person: Manuel Carrillo Jr. Phone Number /Ext. (626) 813 - 5269' (Previous Year Allocation) : $40,000 CDBG Amount Requested: $ 40,000 Other Funds: $63,632.70 General Fund Total: 103,632.70 (Please attach a copy of your proposed budget) Project Name: Baldwin Park Family Service Center Project Description: The Family Service Center offers a variety of social service assistance to the residents of Baldwin Park. The FSC is centrally located and easily accessible to all residents. The services offered at the FSC include but not limited to: medical access referrals food bank referrals emergency shelter vouchers, emergency food vouchers, domestic violence counseling and mental health referrals, emergency transportation, case management, tutoring, and immigration assistance. Over 200 clients are assisted monthly at the center. Many of our clients face severe hurdles in re- establishing themselves as part of our community; our staff is committed to assisting those clients in need. Our target service area is the Low to Moderate Area of Baldwin Park. Staff is requesting a grant in the amount of $40,000.00 to offset the staffing costs for the facility. As noted above, the General Fund contributes to the success of the Family Service Center by covering expenses for utilities, materials and supplies, building maintenances, outside printing expenses, and part time staffing_ Projected Number of Beneficiaries Served: 1,168 Individuals or Households Reviewed By: � ✓� Approved: RECEIVED JA N 1 3 2005 11( UW;ING AI 1IIIlH it 1Y q 111 N MAINZ AVE. HAI I'WIN PAHK. CAW 7% -1b City of Baldwin Park Housing Department FY 2005-2006 Community Development Block Grant Funds Request for Funds CDBG Amount Requested: $87,000 Other Funds: $261,000 Total: $ 348,000 (Please attach a copy of your proposed budget) Project Description: Rapid removal of graffiti from public property and on private property where visible from the street. Graffiti is a very serious problem that continues to grow with each passing year. The City currently provides services to abate nearly 50,000 taggings on an annual basis. While more than 25% of graffiti occurs within CDBG eligible areas we realized that funds are limited for "public service". For that reason we are requesting a minute increase to allow for 25% funding of the program through CDBG funds combined with general fund and gas tax. *** represents all CDBG eligible areas Estimated Project Completion Date: On-going (Please attach additional sheet to provide additional Information that may be pertinent to your request.) For Housing Department Use Only. Recommendation: Approved Den;:::] IN I Reviewed B Approved.. dfl I Contact Person: Manuel Carrillo, Jr. Phone Number/Ext. (626) 813-5269 (Previous Year Allocation): $35,000.00 CDBG Amount Requested: $35,000.00 Other Funds: 16,598.40 General Fund Total: $51,598.40 (Please attach a copy of your proposed budget) Name of Project: The Sports Scholarship Program Project Description: The Sports Scholarship Program provides children of low and moderate-income families in the community with scholarships that will allow them to participate in organized youth sports programs. The City offers 70% of a child's registration fees in an amount not to exceed $100.00 per child regardless of family size. Staff requires that all participants provide proof of address and income verification. Youth organizations that have participated in the Sports Scholarship program include: Jr. All American Football (Roadrunners), Lucky Baldwin Pony League, Eastside Little League, Baldwin Park Little League, National Little League, Baldwin Park Youth Soccer League, Baldwin Park Divas, Wolf Tae Kwon Do, City of West Covina, Street Hockey Program, La Puente All American Football and Cheer as well as the Department of Recreation and Community Services. The Sports Scholarship program has been instrumental in providing children with an opportunity to receive positive recreational experiences, regardless of their ability to pay. The Scholarship program has provided an essential service to the youth of our community. From July 2004 through December 2004, the Sports Scholarship Program has exhausted $16,797.70 (47.9%) of the $35,000 allocated. In comparison, from July 2003 through December 2003, the SSP had exhausted only $16,080.80 (45.94%) of the $35,000 allocated. The entire amount of $35,000 goes directly to participating families and the department absorbs the remaining costs and/or expenses for utilities, materials and supplies, building maintenances, outside printing expenses, and part time staffing. Projected Number of Beneficiaries Served: 570 Individuals or Households Estimated Project Completion Date: Year Round Project/ or until funds are exhausted For Housing Department Use Only. Recommendation: Approved F-1 DenyEl Comments: Reviewed By.,. Y< s Approved._ JAN 1 3 2005 HOUSING At I I I 101111Y City • Baldwin Park Housing Department FY 2005-2006 Community Development Block Grant Funds Request for Funds Contact Person: Manuel Carrillo, Jr. Phone Number/Ext. (626) 813-5269 (Previous Year Allocation): $30,000.00 CDBG Amount Requested: $30,000.00 —Other Funds: $18,661.32 General Fund Total: $48,661.35 (Please attach a copy of your proposed budget) of • 0 of I a a •• , Project Description: The program works to provide job opportunities for youth in our community who need positive alternatives for our youth during the summer months, as well as throughout the year. Our Youth Employment program compliments our Department by acting as a feeder program to our regular part- time staffing needs. The program provides job opportunities for low-moderate income youth between the ages of 16-21 years in the community. Last year the program was very successful, we had 20 participants, who exhausted the entire allocation of $30,000 for the program. This year we are on track to spend all allocated monies as well. Several of the youth have been hired as permanent part-time staff now that they have reached the proper ages for their various duties. The youth gained valuable work experience after being placed in various job locations throughout the City. The reguested amount of $30,000 will go towards funding the program, the department will use other funds to absorb the administration costs of the program including, expenses for utilities, materials and supplies, uniforms, outside printing expenses, participant supervision and program management. Projected Number of Beneficiaries Served: 20 Individuals or Households Estimated Project Completion Date: Year Round Project/ or until funds are exhausted For Housing Department Use Only: Recommendation: Approved DenyE] $ Comments: Reviewed By. RECEIVED J A N 1 3 2005 Al I i 101 !11 Y 4141 N MAIM AVE I 'AlIK, GA 91706 FUNDING APPLICATION BALDWIN PARK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FY 2005 -2006 PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT I. AGENCY INFORMATION Agency Name: CEH Recovery Services Agency Address: 426 Addleman Ave. W. Covina 91792 Number Street City Zip Code Administrator: Dr. Elmer E. Jackson Title: President Administrator Telephone No. 626- 814 -9477 Fax: 626 -960 -8830 Project Site Address: Adm /Classroom: 13212 Francisguito Ave., Baldwin Park Residences: 3060 Feather Ave & 13904 n ak Baldwin park ai7n6 Number Street City Zip Code Project Manager: Dr. Elmer E. Jackson Title: President, Program Director Project Manager's Telephone No. 626- 814 -9477 Fax: 626- 960 -8830 Describe Agency's overall function or purpose. Include history and experience in providing thisservice. (if more room is needed, please attach an additional sheet). See Attached Has the Agency previously received funding from the City of Baldwin Park? x Yes No If yes, please provide number of years 4 1 I. AGENCY INFORMATION (page 1) Describe Agency's overall function or purpose. Include history and experience in providing this service. CEH Recovery Services (CEH Recovery Services) is a residential substance abuse recovery program for low income and other marginalized members of society. Recovery treatment such as Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) and Narcotic Anonymous (NA) and counseling by a certified Chemical Dependency counselors is provided in a safe, structured, residential environment. Each client's recovery is monitored closely so that the chance for successful reintegration into society is maximized. We provide an opportunity for change of lifestyle for non - violent and usually very low- income drug offenders and alcoholics. The program is also open to the disabled and homeless who may not be in need of substance abuse treatment, but need mental and emotional counseling and/or assistance in identifying available social services. For these individuals, we provide transitional housing and for a period of 1 day up to several months. The rehabilitation program was started in Sept. 1993 by Christ Extended Hand Church as an outreach to the community to meet the needs of these people. In March 2000, the recovery services were incorporated separately from the church with plans to expand operations and enhance the program with added counseling, teaching and vocational training. After eleven years of a successful program, our goal is to expand services and to increase the numbers of clients served. -.r PROJECT PROPOSAL AND DESCRIPTION In this section, briefly describe the project proposal, including cost estimates. Grant Amount Requested $_15 , 0 0 0 .0 0 Briefly describe your proposed Project/Program and the objectives. Your response should describe the scope of services for the project. See a f'AC`hed Briefly describe the clientele that will benefit from your services (i.e. homeless youth, the elderly, disabled, handicapped, etc.) See Attached How do your services benefit the above listed clientele? See attached If your agency has been previously funded through Baldwin Park's CDBG program, will this request: (Please check only one) X Increase service. If so, how? Enable mor scholarships with a higher Continue the existing CDBG fug eaEprog am a current service levels. Replace a previous source of funding. If so, list source Create new activity for FY 2005 -2005 funding. 2_ II. PROJECT PROPOSAL AND DESCRIPTION (from page 2) Briefly describe your proposed project /program and the objectives. Your response should describe the scope of services for the project. CEH Recovery is a nine to twelve month rehabilitation program for recovering alcoholics and addicts with the objective of providing a safe drug and alcohol free environment while enabling them to make a lifestyle change. Our immediate objective is to provide scholarships to a few Baldwin Park residents who are in need of our services but are unable to afford a program fee and to provide a partial salary for our program manager /senior counselor. • Currently, many of our clients must apply for General Relief (GR) or be employed to cover the program. fee. GR has required attendance at various classes, meetings and appointments, and the client must seek employment. This does not allow the client to concentrate on their recovery. Ideally, studies have proven that the client's immediate need is for a stress -free environment and to learn what can be done to heal the body and mind and rebuild their lives to become productive citizens. A scholarship for some of these individuals would provide the time needed for a lasting recovery to be effected. • The majority of our counseling and administrative services are volunteered and we are in need of some remuneration in order to be able to continue the work. • Scope of Services ✓ Provides individual and group counseling by certified Chemical Dependency counselors. - Provide Anger Management, Relapse Prevention and Domestic Violence counseling are by counselors certified in those areas. ✓ Provide 12 -Step meetings (AA, NA mtgs and other process groups to help facilitate client's recovery. ✓ Referrals to medical and dental services Transitional housing for disabled and homeless individuals. ✓ Residential services which includes payment of the home utilities, rent, insurance, telephone bills; ✓ Partial salaries, and worker's compensation insurance. Briefly describe the clientele that will benefit from your services Adults who are addicted to alcohol and/or drugs, some of whom are disabled, elderly and/or homeless; also, adults without an addiction problem who are homeless and/or in need of transitional housing, usually because of loss of job and/or family problems. How do your services benefit the above listed clientele? • Provides a safe and sober environment free from alcohol/drugs. • Individuals who often would not receive any medical care are provided with physicals, are seen by a nurse and medications monitored regularly. • Intercede on the client's behalf with the various courts; e.g., Family and Children's Court, Superior and Municipal Court. Most clients have received the Court's favor because of the client's residency in our program, • Restoration from the brokenness of lives destroyed by drug and alcohol addiction. Help with reconciliation of the family through structured, intensive individual and family counseling. 4WO FUNDING APPLICATION BALDWIN PARK COMM-UNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FY 2005-2006 1. Agency Information Agency Name: Down Syndrome Association of Los Angeles, Inc. (DSALA) Agency Address: 315 Arden Avenue, Glendale, CA 91203 Administrator: Gail Williamson Title: Executive Director Project Site Address: Baldwin Park Community Center Project Manager: Claudia Cuevas Title: Crystal Cuevas Foundation Coordinator Project Manager's Telephone No. 323-496-9769 Fax: 626-337-1440 Describe Agency's overall function or purpose. Include history and experience in providing this service. (If more room is needed, please attach an additional sheet). The Down Syndrome Association of Los Angeles's Mission is to enhance the welfare of people with Down syndrome and their families through the development and promotion of education, counseling, employment and recreational programs and to increase public awareness, understanding and acceptance of Down syndrome. The Down Syndrome Association of Los Angeles (DSALA) is a non-profit organization, which has provided support to individuals with Down syndrome and their families for the past 30years. A major mission of DSALA has been to increase public awareness, understanding and acceptance of individuals with Down syndrome. As an affiliate of both the National Down Syndrome Society and the National Down Syndrome Congress, DSALA provides families with the link to a nationwide community that supports individuals with Down syndrome. DSALA provides up-to-date information about Down syndrome through its quarterly newsletters, resource library and annual conferences. In addition, DSALA works on behalf of individuals with Down syndrome both at a local and national level. The association's speaker's bureau provides training to medical professionals and others who work with individuals with Down syndrome so that they can be better served. The staff, volunteers and members of DSALA are dedicated to enhancing the lives of individuals with Down syndrome by promoting opportunities for them to participate in the community. For new parents of children with Down syndrome, DSALA is a lifeline connecting them to experienced families and other community organizations that offer support and provide them with important information on educational, medical and community services. Through the Peer Counseling Service, DSALA offers parents comfort and optimism about the future. The association's peer counselors provide support to approximately 100 - 150 new families annually. History of Success The Down Syndrome Association of Los Angeles began in 1975, with 15 parents of children with Down syndrome. At that time, many parents were receiving poor or very negative information about their child's future. DSALA was borne out of the desire of a small group of families to raise their children with Down syndrome at home rather than to institutionalize them, as was the common practice at the time. Parents began working together to change a system and a philosophy from one that focused on what was deemed negative about an individual with Down syndrome to one that focuses on what individuals with Down syndrome can achieve. The group began meeting monthly and quickly grew to include 70 parents and professionals. In January of 1976 the group organized as a non - profit corporation. By 1990, seven sub - groups were formed to accommodate the growing number of families throughout Los Angeles County. Since it's inception in 1975, DSALA has grown from serving 15 families and their 14 children to serving over 1,600 families in 2005. DSALA collaborates with other organizations in the Los Angeles area regarding common concerns about the developmental disability community. In 1990, DSALA became one of the first affiliates of the National Down Syndrome Society (NDSS). Headquartered in New York, NDSS was established in 1979 to ensure that all people with Down syndrome have an opportunity to reach their full potential in community life. NDSS continues to increase public awareness about Down syndrome and discover its underlying causes through research, education and advocacy. DSALA's association with the NDSS provides a direct means of support for Down syndrome research. Enhancing the lives of individuals with Down syndrome and supporting their families remains the primary focus of the organization, just as it was 30 years ago. What began as a small effort on behalf of a few familie an t e dren in4975 --?gas ��the thousands of individuals with Down yndrome and their families. The Fu r Is Now DSALA's mission focuses on the development and prOMQttion of five specific areas of need including, 1) Education, 2) Counseling, 3) Employment, 4) Recreational Prn_ a,m and-S) Public Awareness. 1) Education: Down syndrome is the most common type of genetic disorder, occurring once in every 800 to 1,000 live births. In the United States each year there are approximately 5,000 to 6,000 babies born with Down syndrome and it affects individuals of all races, ethnicity and economic levels. Much of the information that is available is out -dated and inaccurate. DSALA has developed a comprehensive educational program for families, health care professionals and members of the community to dispel some of the myths concerning Down syndrome and to demonstrate the opportunity for individuals with Down syndrome to have a meaningful life. Our families benefit from the knowledge and experience of professionals, who work with individuals with Down syndrome, by attending sub -group meetings each month. DSALA currently has thriteen sub -groups located in Los Angeles and San Bernardino County. Each group hosts a series of speakers to address the needs of individuals with Down syndrome and their families. Sub -group meetings also allow families to network with each other, sharing valuable information, resources and support. 2) Counseling: Families who learn of their child's diagnosis, whether parentally or at birth, are usually in need of emotional support and access to resources. Many of their questions and concerns have to do with the health and the future of their child. DSALA's peer counseling program is comprised of experienced parents trained by professionals to address these concerns. Because the peer counselors have had similar experiences, they can provide new parents with the support, encouragement and important information they need regarding educational programs and community services. The counselors speak a variety of languages and are usually available within 24 hours of a prenatal diagnosis or birth of a child. -3) Employment: Because there are so many misconceptions about individuals with Down syndrome, finding meaningful employment is difficult. Parents are provided information on how to prepare children for employment through home training and educational programs and material made available through the association. 4) Recreational Programs: Just as it is difficult for individuals with Down syndrome to find employment, it is also difficult for them to find recreational programs in which to participate. DSALA maintains a current resource list of recreational programs, which is available to all members of the organization. Each year, DSALA is able to match individuals who have Down syndrome with recreational programs in the community. Recreational programs are also made available through the newsletter so that families can contact programs on their own. Families are able to learn how to access programs that meet their needs through mini - conferences hosted by the association. Future plans include posting a list of programs on the association's website. 5) Public Awareness: Creating understanding and acceptance of individuals with Down syndrome in the community is by far the most challenging task for the association. Individuals with Down syndrome are more like the rest of society than they are different. They have the same emotions and needs as people without Down syndrome, yet each person is unique. DSALA's goal is for individuals with Down syndrome to be accepted as useful members of society rather than segregating them. DSALA works to provide opportunities for inclusion in school and in our communities. The annual Buddy Walk, co- sponsored by DSALA and the National Down Syndrome Society is one way the organization works to raise the level of awareness in our community. DSALA has sponsored a local walk for the past ten years, attracting thousands of families, friends and volunteers. This event provides all our members and parents the opportunity to talk with their co- workers, neighbors, and families about the exciting prospects for individuals with Down syndrome. The association also partners with NDSS on a Luncheon held annually in Beverly Hills. The luncheon brings together over 400 people from throughout Los Angeles County, to learn about Down syndrome and the value that an individual with Down syndrome brings to society. Several well -known actors with Down syndrome, including Chris Burke and Andrea Freidman, participate in the event, demonstrating how individuals with Down syndrome can have successful careers. 6) Media Consultation: The DSALA has a history of providing consultation to film and television productions about Down syndrome issues and accurate portrayal of characters with Down syndrome. DSALA staff has provided expert consultation to many productions who have sought them out because of their excellent reputation with- in the Hollywood Community. Many actors with DS have gotten their start through contacts from the DSALA, some have gone on to have nice part time careers. Has the Agency previously received funding from the City of Baldwin Park? No PROJECT PROPOSAL AND DESCRIPTION In this section, briefly describe the project proposal, including cost estimates. Grant Amount Requested $20,000 Project Name: Crystal Cuevas Down Syndrome Project of Baldwin Park (CC -DSP of BP) Briefly describe your proposed Project/Program and the objectives. Your response should describe the scope of services for the project. The Crystal Cuevas DS Project of Baldwin Park would provide support to children and adults with Down syndrome and their families in the Baldwin Park Community. Most new parents and parents of children with DS benefit from monthly support group meetings where they can share their concerns receive support and ideas from their peers along with having the opportunities to hear from professionals in a warm and caring atmosphere. The CC -DSP of BP Staff would contact families, organize meetings, originally one meeting per month, and when necessary two per month, one is Spanish and one in English, arrange for space, contact speakers, and arrange for childcare and refreshments. The larger DSALA organization would continue to make new parent packets available to the project when babies with DS are born in BP. This project would help teach parents to reach out to other parents and prepare their children to be included and productive citizens of the Baldwin Park Community. A large concern of the Crystal Cuevas Foundation is to enable parents to be with their children with DS when they require hospitalization. Funds would be available to be requested to help enable a parent to stay with their child during such a time. Individuals with DS have health issues associated with the Syndrome that often requires hospitalization. It can be difficult for a parent to take a day off from work or purchase several meals out, yet is so important for the health of the child to have their parent present not only for the child's emotional health, but for the parent to monitor the health care given to the child. Staff would also contact businesses such as restaurants and lodging in proximity of hospitals where a child was treated requesting discounts and gift certificates for parents. This is already a practice of the Crystal Curevas Foundation. We would also like to plan one awareness activity for the 2005 — 2006 year. This would be planned by the parents assisted by the staff and would include community participation sometime close to the end of the year, also as a celebration to the accomplishments of the program. If the program develops and parents find it to be helpful the DSALA would like to see the Crystal Cuevas DS Project of Baldwin Park grow even larger in the future. We would like to bring in some additional programs such as our "Parents as Their Child's First Teacher Reading Readiness " program, Music Therapy, Drama Therapy and many other successful teaching programs once we have identified a consumer base and developed a trusted relationship with them. PROJECT P L AND DESCRIPTION In this section, briefly describe the project proposal, including cost estimates. Grant Amount Requested $ &KO as Briefly describe your proposed Project/Program and the objectives. Your response should describe the scope of services for the project. CL �- iiflin•ai� �3Q.e�.�is� C',L. C�m�t" G[- Briefly describe the clientele that will benefit from your services (i.e. homeless youth, the eld9dy, disabled, handicapped, etc.) How do your services benefit the above listed clientele? If your agency has been previously funded through Baldwin Park's CDBG program, will this request: (Please check only one) Increase service. If so, how. � 1 S Continue the existing CDBG funded program at current service levels. Replace a previous source of funding. if so, list source Create new activity for FY 2005 -2006 funding. 2 PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT t. AGENCY INFORMATION Agency Name: Mid Valley Recovery Services Inc. Agency Address: 3430 Cogswell Road El Monte Ca 91732 Number Street City Zip Code Administrator: Beverly A. Stiles Title: C.E.O. Administrator Telephone No. 626 -453 -3417 Fax: 626- 453 - 3422 Project Site Address: The C.O.U.R.T. Program Number Street City Zip Code 2000 Tyler Avenue South El Monte, Ca: 91733 Project Manager: David Jackson Title: Director Non Residential Services Project Manager's Telephone No. 626 4533414 Fax: 626 453 3422 Describe Agency's overall function or purpose. Include history and experience in providing this service. (If more room is needed, please attach an additional sheet) Mid Valley Recovery Services Inc. Has provided treatment recovery services to low income and indigent men who suffer from alcoholism and drug addiction since 1969. Located in El Monte California since 1978, the agency has grown and expanded services to include ,women, pregnant women and families. The style of service we provide includes, self help support, behavior modification, drug and alcohol testing, advocacy, individual substance abuse counseling, employment skill building; life style changes and much effort is placed on self responsibility. Supportive low cost housing in a alcohol and drug free living center is also offered in order for individuals to maintain long term recovery. Sober social recreational activities is also an important part of the treatment strategies. The modalities of treatment we provide are non- residential/out patient, Residential treatment, (6 months to 1 year), supportive low income housing, on- site child care for individuals who are in treatment while attending groups and individual sessions, and a collaborative project with the El Monte Superior Court. We are the treatment provider of the Court. The agency's programs are all certified and the residential programs are licensed and certified by the State of California Alcohol and Drug Programs Administration to provide alcohol and drug treatment services. The agency has an excellent reputation in the City of El Monte and surrounding communities. We receive funds through the County of Los Angeles Office of Alcohol and Drug Programs Administration, (pass through funds from Substance abuse Block federal grants) but additional funds are needed to provide services in order to meet the unmet needs of Baldwin Park residents that receive treatment at our programs. See attached letters of support and agency brochures. Has the Agency previously received funding from the City of Baldwin Park? X Yes No If yes, please provide number of years 2004 - 2005 . PROJECT PROPOSAL AND DESCRIPTION In this section, briefly describe the project proposal, including cost estimates. The proposed project is to provide drug treatment services for citizens that reside in the Baldwin Park Community. This project is created for individuals who have been arrested on felony drug charges and are eligible to attend the year long intensive El Monte Superior Krug Court Program. Mid Valley Recovery Services is the treatment provider for the Court. Grant Amount Requested $ 10,000` Briefly describe your proposed Project/Program and the objectives. Your response should describe the scope of services for the project. The goal of the C.O.UR.T. Program is to ensure the best possible outcome for the addicted individual. To reduce the incidents of drug addiction and the impact it has on the community, while improving the quality of life for the individual. This is program is developed to ensure sobriety, work enhancement, self responsibility, self awareness, community service, healthy life style, sober recreational activities, and family reunification. Measurable objectives: To have 75% of all who enter the drug court complete the one year program. To have 95% of those completing the program, be working or attending vocational training. To have 100% of those completing living a healthy life style, free of drugs and alcohol. To have 70% of those completing attending the Alumni Activities. Treatment services to be provided. 1) Case Management 2) Group alcohol and drug education 3) Individual Counseling and Treatment/Recovery planing, 4) Referrals and follow up case management to vocational counseling 5) Body fluid testing for drug and alcohol screening. 6) Residential Treatment for those who are homeless or living in an environment that is not conducive to sobriety. 7) Social Recreational Activities 6) Referrals for Communicable disease screening, including TB testing and HIV testing. 7) Education on sexually transmitted diseases and healthy life style changes, 8) Alumni Activities and one year completion of this intense program.their felony drug cases are dismissed giving the opportunity of the addicted person a new clean start on life, 9) additionally we provide parenting classes. The Community Outreach United Recovery Taskforce (C.O.U.R.T) program provides the treatment services for the El Monte Superior Court Drug Court. Many of the clients we service are from Baldwin Park. The project provides for year long treatment in the drug court. We experienced a reduction in funds from our primary grant to provide these services. In order to continue to provide and not cut services, we look to the communities CDBG funds to augment these badly needed services. Men and women are held in County jail awaiting space availability to enter the C.O.U.R.T. Program. The C.O.U.R.T. Program has been in existence since 1994, and has been able to provide statistics through the Drug Court ;Management Information System (DCMIS), which qualifies the Drug Court method of treatment as one of the most successful treatment models known to the professional recovery community. Monitored urine collection five days per week on a random basis insures that each participant is physically clean and sober. The process of change begins with a chemically free body and mind. Individual and group counseling, self -help meetings and weekly supervision by Commissioner Jose Rodriguez, Division 2 of the El Monte Superior Court, and the program staff all help to create lasting change for the participants. Baldwin Park has been a recipient of our recovery minded graduates since the beginning of the agency's existence. All though our program is located in the City of El Monte, (moving to South El Monte in April 2005) drug offenders from all over the San Gabriel Valley have found recovery at our door. A person need only have committed a drug offense within the jurisdiction of the El Monte Superior Court to be initially eligible for the C.O.U.R.T. Program. Upon graduation, each recovering graduate has the opportunity to become an active member of the C.O.U.R.T. Alumni Association. This association is active in community affairs and has as its mission to help reduce the incidents of drug and alcohol use throughout the San Gabriel Valley. This alumni association is the largest of its kind in Los Angeles County. The client is the recipient of services then becomes a giver of services. Raising funds through the alumni to help individuals get their auto licensee, partial rent, food and transportation. At Christmas they helped collect gifts for the children of clients who have just become a client of the program and usually do not have any resources to help their families. The residential site located at 3430 Cogswell Road, El Monte, Ca is used for clients who are homeless or live in housing that is not conducive to recovery. In some cases the individual needs to be placed in residential as they are unable to maintain their sobriety in the non residential program. By removing the individual from the environment that he has been accustomed to which often is with other addicts, his or her chances of staying sober are improved while living in a structured treatment program. � L FUNDING APPLICATION BALDWIN PARK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FY 2005 - 2006_ PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT I. AGENCY INFORMATION Agency Name: ' Mo,J A,-ri— ' B� /AeE Mte R SJJf cc: t? o" Agency Address: �W &,15 jr &VIA ✓� 6AexzVAY > -0jr7 d�7 tleJr L'o1r /yA �'� 9® 91 Number street . Zip Cod Administrato & Title: Administrator Telephone No. Fax: Project Site Address: /acto W647- Vl,� .rv/r�.a�o -i,sr Gov /�v+ e",a 9®i Number Street City Zip Code Project Manager: , ®o o4 Ar >a&) Title D ,o >oL Project Manager's Telephone No. epw, -944 - 286 / Fax: fgLlo 3Y'7^ a--MA Describe Agency's overall function or purpose. Include history and experience in providing this service. (If more room is needed, please attach an additional sheet)_ t ,r4AJ 0,10 elCG 1,00pfPeJA sA125- 127'.i t PAL^ -G FAr/ /Ly /2cdOcl1 GrEsCJT� AAS _pcz' --, Q ,/j opgG CN f IOJ t5/ A.%e a % ! -f^ t" 9•S /Q C% 0° 12-d D e ® /fit Ot: /e y 'Lr �yP+- Q�nt -rT s�P d ®P1H.4r ®.t_ n.lt P'i /_Lf /lla3 BS 7a J�IT-02 Qr'onlo E AR)a 6XJ44UEL ;G'AM/ fv Foeas-'D ' � Hleq ztY 3c,w /cGs F�� Mlcc-- ;! J' L it/Eid.r CN>ed zcd Has the Agency previously received funding from the City of Baldwin Park? Yes X No If yes, please provide number of years s F l PROJECT, PROPOSAL AND DESCRIPTION In this section, briefly describe the project proposal, including cost estimates. Grant Amount Requested Briefly describe your proposed Project/Program and the objectives. Your response should describe the scope of services for the project. Briefly describe the clientele that will benefit from your services (i.e. homeless youth, the elderly, disabled, handicapped, etc.) J11 ro WiT-A-1 11V M u JE Tk� 9= faJAaceAC 1 EsAS or MS AMLL? S Toz OIJ AFilC, SS$ or d, "a 94A *rC> oB?<inJ se"'Cas, ' *NCB AAZ 0v &cr, Pave Ftee�s -� r�o�r+uo zy r �+cu How do your services benefit the above listed clientele? E-t c �s — z '7 ' �U r �AMt l` Rr4sJ4CE <Pc�rAUSc ►D�a+�a 'tii� S�CCfF�G NEcDS CX- 'n•% +7aMtLy, ACt_ FeES Q r Can,Ac, 1+OtirATED �rZvM Tt+C- etOST ALL 2aE life tJ D ®F'T rWI L-1 ew+ a Tt H6(9 MavNQ a If your agency has been previously funded through Baldwin Park's CDBG program, will this request: (Please check only one) Increase service. If so, how? Continue the existing CDBG funded program at current service levels. Replace a previous source of funding. if so, list source Create new activity for FY 2005 -2006 funding. IA 4..� - _, �,,. -r !; t4Aa r.4& ♦ ti i / tee: Briefly describe the clientele that will benefit from your services (i.e. homeless youth, the elderly, disabled, handicapped, etc.) J11 ro WiT-A-1 11V M u JE Tk� 9= faJAaceAC 1 EsAS or MS AMLL? S Toz OIJ AFilC, SS$ or d, "a 94A *rC> oB?<inJ se"'Cas, ' *NCB AAZ 0v &cr, Pave Ftee�s -� r�o�r+uo zy r �+cu How do your services benefit the above listed clientele? E-t c �s — z '7 ' �U r �AMt l` Rr4sJ4CE <Pc�rAUSc ►D�a+�a 'tii� S�CCfF�G NEcDS CX- 'n•% +7aMtLy, ACt_ FeES Q r Can,Ac, 1+OtirATED �rZvM Tt+C- etOST ALL 2aE life tJ D ®F'T rWI L-1 ew+ a Tt H6(9 MavNQ a If your agency has been previously funded through Baldwin Park's CDBG program, will this request: (Please check only one) Increase service. If so, how? Continue the existing CDBG funded program at current service levels. Replace a previous source of funding. if so, list source Create new activity for FY 2005 -2006 funding. IA `tom f FUNDING APPLICATION BALDWIN PARK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FY 2005 -2006 PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT I. AGENCY INFORMATION Agency Name: CHOICES Organization Agency Address: 15701 E. Hill Street La Puente 91744 Number Street City Zip Code Administrator: Aida Feria Title: Director Administrator Telephone No. (626) 369 -1173 Fax: (626)369 -8727 Project Site Address: 14305 Morizan Street Baldwin Park 91706 Number Street City Zip Code Project Manager: Miriam Valenzuela Title: Program Coordinator Project Manager's Telephone No. (626) 960 -1334 Fax: (626) 369 -8727 Describe Agency's overall function or purpose. Include history and experience in providing this service. (If more room is needed, please attach an additional sheet). CHOICES is a non profit community- based organization that provides mental health services to ethnic minorities and their families. See Attachment Has the Agency previously received funding from the City of Baldwin Park? X_ Yes No If yes, please provide number of years 7 years 1 PROJECT PROPOSAL AND DESCFUPTION this section, briefly describe the project proposal, including cost estimates. :grant Amount Requested $ 30,000 :criefly describe your proposed Project/Program and the objectwE.,::. Your response ,,hould describe the scope of services for the project, :)ur proposed Healthy Families project aims to deliver client- man__3 qement, outreach, :prevention, and education services on the issues of relationship Ndofence, rape /sexual assault and child sexual abuse. Educational workshops on sexuaa abuse, relationship violence and child abuse will be conducted for any and all community members and :irganizations. Our project also provides a weekly bilingual dome;,tic violence ivomen's support group. 3riefly describe the clientele that will benefit from your services (i:ie. homeless ndividuats, youth, elderly, disabled, handicapped etc.) -he clientele that will benefit from our services include the youth, the elderly, women and men of all ages, the disabled /handicapped and all families affecia:Ad by relationship - ��iolence. How do your services benefit the above listed clientele? The above listed clientele will benefit from our case- managemeni: and educational workshops as well as from our ability to provide all services in Sp !inish. if your agency has been previously funded through Baldwin Park: CDBG program, wilt this request: (Please check only one) Increase service level. if so, how ?? X Continue the existing CDBG funded program at current service levels. Replace a previous source of funding. If so, list s;:ir.arce Create new activity for FY 2005 -2006 funding. 2 FUNDING APPLICATION PARK BALDWIN ! ! lR9 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FY 2005 -2006 PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT 1. AGENCY INFORMATION Agency game: Institute for Urban Research and Development - Project ACHIEVE El Monte Agency Address: 840 Echo Park Ave. Los An eles, CA 90026 Number Street City Zip Code Administrator, Jennifer Zambrano Title: Regional Director Los Angeles County Administrator Telephone No. 213 -482 -9300 Fax: 213- 482 -9301 Project Site Address: 11411 Valle Blvd. EI Monte, CA 91731 Number Street City 1p e Project Manager: Claudia Paredes Title: Director of Case Management Services Project Manager's Telephone No. 626 - 444 -9000 Fax: 626- 444 -9044 Describe Agency's overall function or purpose. Include history and experience in providing this service. (If more room is needed, please attach an additional sheet). The Institute for Urban Research and Development (TURD) founded in 1996 is anon- profit, non - partisan, community based research and development organization that assists public and private agencees with the advancement of strategic planning and model programs that respond to the economic, housing, and social needs of neighborhoods, cities and counties from local regional and national perspectives. See Attachment A for additional agency background information. Has the Agency previously received funding from the City of Baldwin Park? Yes x No If yes, please provide number of years 1 Institute for Urban Research and Development 2005 -2006 Baldwin Park CDBG Application Ra0, 1 - Over the last seven years, TURD has worked in collaboration with a broad base of community - based organizations and individuals to develop programs in the following areas: Community Development Programs: working with local governments, community - based organizations and faith -based institutions to identify community needs and establish strategies, tools and resources for developing solutions to meet social, economic, and cultural needs. Economic Development Programs: promoting sidewalk vending as means of facilitating neighborhood revitalization through entrepreneurial training and small business development in low- income communities. V.E.N.D. (Vital Economic Neighborhood Development) is a collaborative effort with public and private agencies that works towards overcoming decades of neglect in low income neighborhoods through a community assets reinvestment strategy including housing, businesses, education, leisure, recreation, and the arts. The Mac Arthur Park Sidewalk Vending District program is the first legal district for sidewalk vending in the history of the City of Los Angeles that focuses on creating worker owned, micro - business enterprises for vendors. Mama's Hot Tamales Cafe is the only combined commissary, restaurant, and food processing establishment that provides business and job training with hands on and classroom instruction designed to train sidewalk vendors to begin a career path towards success in the culinary world. Homeless Programs: working with community based organizations to break the cycle of homelessness, one person, and one family at a time in communities throughout Southern California. IURD's philosophy regarding the provision of services to homeless persons is founded on fulfilling the following four key objectives: 1) Providing safe, comfortable, service- enriched environment in which homeless residents acquire the tools necessary to achieve self - sufficiency and independent living through their participation in case management activities; 2) Forming collaborative relationships with other homeless service providers and units of local government. IURD collaborates with the East San Gabriel Valley Consortium on Homelessness and local social service providers. 3) Forming collaborative relations with the community. TURD also reaches out to local community residents and business operators to foster public understanding of, and participation in, the issues surrounding homelessness. 4) TURD also strives to achieve an accurate and comprehensive understanding of the issues that surround homelessness and builds community consensus to bring about needed change. This has been primarily done through homeless counts and surveys which includes the 2003 East San Gabriel Valley Homeless Count. TURD is committed to helping "break the cycle of homelessness" — one person, one family at a time — in communities throughout Southern California. The goal our homeless prevention and supportive services programs is to promote client self - sufficiency, positive self - esteem, individual dignity, and personal growth that will help people to achieve and maintain stable sources of income, positive social relationships, and long -term permanent housing. Case management is our primary tool for helping homeless and low - income individuals and families to achieve and sustain self - sufficiency. Our programs are structured to assist families and individuals through a case management approach designed to address the multiple needs and concerns of our clients and help them to identify and remove barriers to achieving self - sufficiency and successfully maintain independent living. PROJECT •. . AND • In this section, briefly describe the project proposal, including cost estimates Grant Amount Requested $.24,000 Briefly describe your proposed Project/Program and the objectives. Your response should describe the scope of services for the project. The Proiect ACHIEVE Street Outreach Team and the case management staff at the Access Center currently provide services to families and individuals who have become homeless and either reside in Baldwin Park or have an identifiable link to the community. The Street Outreach Team routinely navigates Baldwin Park seeking out and developing relationships with homeless persons in the city. In addition to our current activity, the Street Outreach Team is interested in expanding contact with the City of Baldwin Park and local civic groups as well as expanding routine contact opportunities to assist in reducing the total community cost of homelessness in Baldwin Park. The Street Outreach Team also facilitates homeless family and individual services at the Access Center in El Monte, An inter- disciplinary team of case managers provide services in the areas of employment, substance abuse treatment mental health and housing The long term outcome of case management is to increase a clients income and help them locate supportive housing. Briefly describe the clientele that will benefit from your services (i.e. homeless youth, the elderly, disabled, handicapped, etc.) Currently homeless families and individuals in Baldwin Park can access all Project ACHIEVE services free of charge The chronic homeless population we serve includes individuals with special needs such as a mental and/or physical disability. How do vour services benefit the above listed clientele? Homeless families and individuals through case management are able to overcome personal obstacles to a stable and safe living environment that includes stable income and affordable housing. Specialized case managerrient provides specific opportunities for clients to achieve outcomes that include access to mainstream resources mental health treatment, employment assistance, and affordable /supportive housing. if your agency has been previously funded through Baldwin Park's i.;UL3(3 program, will this request: (Please check only one) increase service. If so, how? Continue the existing CDBG funded program at current service levels. Replace a previous source of funding. If so, list source Create new activity for FY 2005 -2006 funding. 4 W iC�2 FUNDING APPLICATION BALDWIN PARK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FY 2005-2006 PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT 1. AGENCY INFORMATION Agency Name: Project SISTER Sexual Assault Crisis and Prevention Services Agency Address: 363 South Park Ave., Suite 303, Pomona, CA 91766 Number Street City Zip Code Administrator., Julie Boynton, LCSW Title: Executive Director Administrator Telephone No. ( 909) 623-1619 Fax: (909) 622-8389 Project Site Address: Project SISTER office and Sierra Vista High School: 3600 North Frazier St., Baldwin Park, CA 91706 Number Street City Zip Code Project Manager: Dina Dalep, Psy.D. Title: Clinical Services Director Project Manager's Telephone No.(909) 623-1619 Fax: (909) 622-8389 Describe Agency's overall function or purpose. Include history and experience in providing this service. (if more room is needed, please attach an additional sheet). Proiect SISTER was incorporated as an independent non-profit agency in 1972, following its founding in response to a series of violent rapes in the Claremont/Pomona area. Our mission is to reduce the trauma and risk of sexual violence and child abuse. We provide a 24-hour hotline, accompaniment/advocacy services, counseling for individuals and groups, support groups, teen prevention education classes, adult self-defense classes, community education, and Senior Safety programs. Has the Agency previously received funding from the City of Baldwin Park? x Yes No If yes, please provide number of years: 1 In this section, briefly describe the project proposal, including cost estimates. Grant Amount Requested $5,000 Briefly describe your proposed Project/Program and the objectives. Your response should describe the scope of services for the project. Project SISTER proposes to expand the hours of direct service to counseling clients in Baldwin Park from the current level of 70 hours per fiscal year to 100 hours for fiscal year 2005 -06, to be billed at $50 per hour. The total requested CDBG grant is $5,000. Counseling hours primarily include services to the students in our group program at Sierra Vista High School, although other eligible residents of Baldwin Park who have experienced sexual violence or child abuse may receive counseling as well. Our main obiective is to treat survivors of sexual assault and /or incest at Sierra Vista who have been referred to Project SISTER's on -site group by the school counselor, in order to alleviate the traumatic aftereffects of sexual violence. Although counseling is provided in a group setting at Sierra Vista, additional counseling is provided on an individual basis at Proiect SISTER's offices as needed. Briefly describe the clientele that will benefit from your services (i.e. homeless youth, the elderly, disabled, handicapped, etc.) Our services will benefit Baldwin Park residents, 15 -18 years of age, who are students at Sierra Vista High School. Clients for our program are referred to us for counseling by their high school counselor, and are all survivors of sexual assault or incest. How do your services benefit the above listed clientele? Protect SISTER's counseling services help young survivors of sexual assault and incest find their voices and become strong and productive members of the community again, by addressing the aftermath of sexual violence. Long - lasting psychological problems can include chronic anxiety and fear, low self- esteem leading to alcohol and drug abuse, submitting to abusive relationships in the future, developing suicidal tendencies and severe depression. Through our counseling services, survivors of sexual violence can become empowered to take control of their lives and heal, moving on to healthy and productive futures. If your agency has been previously funded through Baldwin Park's CDBG program, will this request: (Please check only one) X Increase service. If so, how? Increased number of hours of direct client service Continue the existing CDBG funded program at current service levels. Replace a previous source of funding_ If so, list source Create new activity for FY 2005 -2006 funding. 2 FUNDING APPLICATION BALDWIN PARK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FY 2005 -2006 PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT 1. AGENCY INFORMATION Agency Name. -- { rr� v✓t a� -fie- �Zedim lcock �i Agency Address: e Number treet ' City Zip Code Q Administrator: VC�1)(At10 k- �Of -e`� Title: cvr° \t4:6 Administrator Telephone No Z@ G1(p ®- aSQ Fax: `7 .Project Site Address: Wm 01 4 Nz- Number Street City Zip Code Project Manager: VQ& I�ay'l (6_ Title: �:C �ri� fGt �ir{ t tkp) c9 tnD -ct 5-00:;- Project Managers Telephone No ZtP �?.?�Ziv Fax: (1o2tp) W1,0'" el-SO-7 Describe Agency's overall function or purpose. Include history and experience in ppviding this service. (If more room is needed, please attach an additional sheet tow . PI1 �-p r oJer t'1 c1l'S Has the Agency previously received funding from the City of Baldwin Park? --t Yes No If yes, please provide number of years t P. JT PROPOSAL ND DESCRIPTION In this section, briefly describe the project proposal, including cost estimates. Grant Amount Requested $ —1 1.D O° 00 Briefly describe your proposed Project/Program and the objectives. Your response should describe the scope of services for the project. Briefly describe the clientele that will benefit from your services (i.e. homeless youth, the elderly, disabled, handicapped etc.) t -%a o yyx -c V PE. L v 1 C Yt'1 s tit t� 11_ y� How do your services benefit the above lis d clientele? If your agency has been previously funded through Baldwin Park's CDBG program, will this request: (Please check only, one) -- Increase service. If so, how? Continue the existing CDBG funded program at current service levels. Replace a previous source of funding. If so, list source Create new activity for FY 2005 -2006 funding. 2( CHURCH OF THE REDEEMER FOODPROGRAM This program was created with the purpose of helping the needy families of our community and Church. We serve food to over 100 families every month. The families need to have an application on file and the food is distributed the last Saturday of the Month with the exception of November, when the food is given the Tuesday before Thanksgiving Day because we add a turkey in the box of food. Everything that we give to all these families is free of charge. We also serve emergency food. That means that different agencies like In- foLine, Baldwin Park Family Services, different social workers, school, etc., refer to us people that are in need of emergency food. We help this people just one time with a box of food according to household size. We serve approximately 10 — 15 families per week. Every so often, people call to check on application avail - ability to file one with the Church Food Program. This program keeps running due to the generosity of the members of the Church that donate financial assistance and also with the help from the Los Ange- les Regional Foodbank that provides USDA assistance, but we need to purchase the rest of the food needed'. We also pick up once a week, bread from Albertson's Supermarket in Baldwin Park, and from Pizza Hut in La Puente. This program has been in place for over 1 years, under the direction of Mrs. Ruth Davila and all the volunteers that give their time and support. None of this people received a cent for their hours of work, its just a work of love; File: FoodProgram.sam 11 v n CHURCH OF THE REDEEMER 3739 N. Monterey Ave. • Baldwin Park, CA 91706 •My redeemer fives. Tel (626) 960 -9585 • Fax (626) 960 -9587 Job 18:25 �R3D Rev. Aureliano Flores, Pastor e- We e_ A4 °e `n f a m,`i e lrGg i err \2 -e►4J— 2�d� 4, X-- ,k,,s> PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT 1. AGENCY INFORMATION Agency Name: Santa Anita Family Service Agency Address: 605 S. Myrtle Monrovia, CA 91016 Number Street City Zip Code Administrator: Fred Lova.'Ph.D. Title: Executive Director Administrator Telephone No. (626) 359 -9358 Fax: (626) 35 -7647 Project Site Address: 603 S. Myrtle Monrovia, CA 91016 Number Street City Zip Code Project Manager: Jennifer Foote, Psv.D. Title: Director Senior Services Project Manager's Telephone No. (626) 359 -9358 ext.37 Fax: (626) 358 -7647 Describe Agency's overall function or purpose. Include history and experience in providing this service. (if more room is needed, please attach an additional sheet). mo 1 PROJECT P O L AND DESCRIPTION In this section, briefly describe the project proposal, including cost estimates. Grant Amount Requested $15,000 Briefly describe your proposed Project/Program and the objectives. Your response should describe the scope of services for the project. SEE ATTACHED SHEETS 2A (3 pages total) Briefly describe the clientele that will benefit from your services (i.e. homeless youth, the elderly, disabled, handicapped, etc.) Our target population is low income, inorily eiders (however we serve any older adult), and disabled and dependent adults age 1 +. How do your services benefit the above listed clientele? F Program Description and Objectives Program Title: Senior & Disabled Adults Care Management Program Santa Anita Family Service has been a social service contractor with the City of Baldwin Park, providing comprehensive assessment and care management services since 1999. The care manager links Baldwin Park's senior and disabled residents to many of the other services and programs that Santa Anita Family Service is able to provide. In addition, the care manager is an advocate and resource specialist who has expertise and knowledge about all other services that might be available to assist our senior clients. Santa Anita Family Service professional and paraprofessional staff will provide all care management services. The care manager assigned to the Baldwin Park site has over 10 years of experience in working with older and disabled adults in the city of Baldwin Park. In addition; she has been recognized and acknowledged by city officials and by the local press for her outstanding work on behalf of the senior and disabled population. The Project Director has a - doctorate degree in clinical psychology and will provide the clinical supervision and administrative duties to ensure project compliance for CDBG guidelines. Santa Anita Family Service's mission is to enable older adults and disabled adults above the age of 18 years to remain safely in their homes and within their community. We accomplish this by providing access to resources and services that will enable them to avoid moving into a more institutional residence. Our work with older and disabled adults is based upon a premise of respect and dignity. It is our policy to never make decisions for someone, rather we are there to assist and advocate. It is not our job to be intrusive or controlling. The independence, safety and autonomy of our clients is of the utmost concern and importance to us. If the older or disabled adults need more assistance than we can address these issues when they come to the community center and the care manager will arrange for an in -home visit. The care manager will then do .a more thorough assessment to ensure the older or disabled adult is getting all the assistance they may require. In addition, we always attempt to enlist the assistance of the person's family in working on solutions to problems. Our care manager is currently stationed at the Baldwin Park community center every Wednesday morning from 8:00 to 12:00. However, with an increase in funds we would be able to increase the hours a care manager is stationed at the Baldwin Park community center to a total of twelve hours a week, days to be determined by the Baldwin Park residents needs. While on site, our care manager assists clients by arranging for in home services (i.e. housekeeping, personal care, respite, etc.). She also advocates for her clients with the Social Security Administration, the Dept. of Social Services, INS, MediCal, HMO's, and Legal Services. In addition, she has worked side by side with the, Baldwin Park Housing Authority, Code Enforcement, and the Police department in meeting the needs of her clients. She also is knowledgeable and assists clients in filling out their rental and homeowners' rebate forms. The amount they receive is dependent upon their income but for low- income older and disabled adults this amount averaged over $340 last year. Furthermore, we offer the telephone reassurance program, which is run by 2A our volunteers. Our clients are contacted daily (Monday - Friday) by a volunteer who often is the only social contact that person may have that day. Santa Anita Family Service is also able to offer other services in order to provide the needed emotional and financial services to the residents of Baldwin Park. The following is a brief summary list of services Santa Anita Family Service will be able to provide to the residents of Baldwin Park: Service Definitions: s Information and referral: Answers simple questions and provides clients with referrals to various community services. Clients are responsible for contacting and arranging for services for themselves. Each unit reported represents a client contact. e Comprehensive Assessment: Assist clients with short term, moderately complex problems. Service includes the following: problem definition, developing a method or plan for helping the client, either helping the client make arrangement for services or making arrangements for the client, assistance with forms, translation services, and checking back with the client to be sure their needs were met. s Care Management: Assists frail, usually homebound older or disabled adults and their families with one or more long -term complex problems. Care management is a time intensive, individualized service that includes the following: 1.) Perform an in -depth in -home assessment with client, family members and support network; 2.) Development of a written care plan with input from client and family; 3.) Arranging for delivery of services; 4.) Client monitoring; and 5.) Reassessment if the case is closed and needs to be reopened during the same fiscal year. A client may be in this program from a few months to several years depending on the severity of the problems and the clients needs and abilities. ® Home Chore: Provides the clients with a onetime heavy cleaning of their home. ♦ Home Modification: Assists clients with a onetime minor adaptations to their homes or apartments (i.e. raised toilet seats, hand held showers, bathing benches, and safety grab bars) to improve safety and enhance accessibility. s Respite: Provides unpaid caregivers with up to 4 hours of respite care per week. The program is intended to provide care for clients while unpaid caregivers are freed up to attend to other activities and relief from care - giving. ® Personal Care: Provides clients with temporary in home personal care assistance while waiting for IHSS services (In Home Supportive Services from the state of California) to start up or while they are recovering from a recent hospitalization or illness. ® Light Housekeepiniz: Provides temporary light housekeeping assistance for up to 4 hours per week for clients who are waiting to receive IHSS or who need temporary help while recovering from an illness or recent hospitalization. 2A- ♦ In Home Services ReLyistry: Matches workers with clients who need help in their home. The client becomes the employer. The workers are screened (job references checked, proof of legal ability to work, current TB test) by our staff. Workers may accept IHSS hours or private pay and we have workers who are available for live -in positions. Clients are also given assistance, if needed, on tips on hiring and legal responsibilities, taxes, etc. ♦ Telephone Reassurance: Volunteers make phone calls to shut -ins to provide socialization and reassurance. Emergency contacts are called when the client does not answer for two days in a row. ♦ Family Caregiver Services: Assists family caregivers by increasing the number of services available to them as they attempt to help older adults remain in their home. Support groups, counseling, respite care, adult day care, etc. are just a few of the ways in which we are able to support non paid family caregivers. The care manager is a Santa Anita Family Service employee and is entitled to benefits including vacation, paid holidays, sick leave, and all State of California mandated insurances. Benefits are the responsibility of Santa Anita Family Service. When the care manager is absent other staff will provide back up for emergency cases and will be able to provide telephone assistance to clients during normal business hours. Santa Anita Family Service will provide liability insurance and add the City of Baldwin Park as "additionally insured The City of Baldwin Park will continue to provide office space and access to telephone, fax, and copier machines. No City Council Agenda Feb 16 2005 PURPOSE This report requests that the City Council deny the vacation of a portion of Kenmore Avenue. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION In 1991, Ruiz Brothers dedicated a strip of land (30'x 132) for the construction of Kenmore Avenue. They provided a bond of $42,000 for the improvements of Kenmore Avenue. Ruiz Brothers did not develop the land and recently, D.C. Corporation has acquired this land and some surrounding parcels. D.C. Corporation has submitted Tract Map No. 61345 for nineteen (19) lots and has requested that the City vacate the existing (30' x 132') right -of -way (see attached Exhibit "A "). D.C. Corporation wants to utilize the existing street right -of -way for their development and is proposing to construct a substandard City street, only thirty -feet (30) wide. In addition, D.C. Corporation is not constructing a parkway and sidewalk along the new proposed street, therefore, children and residents will have to walk in the street, which is unsafe. RECOMMENDATION Staff requests that the City Council review D.C. Corporation's request to vacate the existing right -of -way along Kenmore Avenue and either deny or approve the construction of a substandard street. REPORT PREPARED BY Arjan Idnani Assistant Director of Public Works Attachments Exhibit "A" — Kenmore Avenue Vacation Exhibit "B" - Proposed Kenmore Avenue Vacation SU APN 8546- 004 -105 30, 30, C uQ co co f APN 8546- 004 -108 w � m o � N — — M z m APN 8546 - 004 -109 CD APN 8546- 004 -079 3 ®, 3 ®, APN 8546 - 004 -061 30' ZL, 30` LEGEND: - DENOTES AREA TO BE VACATED. << PREPARED BY: AIM LAND PLANNERS DATE. SEPTEMBER 29, 2004 AvAmHaPACENT SURVEYORS AVENUE olix=! l&lvxw CFVIL ENGINEERS 1 �R AVENUE �aM C, LA, VACATION JOB PLO. 367 (714) 636 -6770 (714) &30-5773 FAX X: \JN367 \3575P -DWC XHIT ■ PROPOSED KENMORE AVENUE VACATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THE SOUTHERLY 132 FEET OF THE EASTERLY 30 FEET OF LOT 29 OF VALLEY VIEW ACRES, IN THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 12, PAGES 86 AND 87 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. KU N 367160 C U M ENTSl367 EXH -B.wp d �. 111110l" 11111111IN, TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Sid Mousavi, Interim Chief Executive Officer DATE: February 16, 2005 City Council Agenda Feb 16 2005 0% Item No. Zf •01 SUBJECT: Housing Commission Appointment to Fill the Un-expired Vacancy of Office No. 5 (Sally Wieck) BACKGROUND The Housing Commission consists of seven (7) appointed members. Office Nos. 1 through 5 are for a four-year term and Office 6 and 7, which are Tenant positions, are for a two-year term. The un-exprired term of office for Office No. 5 is June 30, 2007. On November 18, 2004, staff received a letter of resignation from Housing Commissioner Sally Wieck, whereby creating an un-expired vacancy in Office No. 5 of the Housing Commission. A public Notice of Vacancy was posted in three locations within the city and published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune on November 29, December 6 and 13th, 2004. The deadline for receipt of applications was December 22, 2004. At its meeting of January 5, 2005, staff presented a report to the City Council for consideration of appointment to fill the un-expired vacancy of Office No. 5 of the Housing Commission. At that time, there was only one (1) previous two-year application submitted for consideration of appointment at which time, the City Council directed staff to re-notice the vacancy. The vacancy was re-noticed and the deadline to apply was Tuesday, February 8, 2005. Three (3) additional applications were received during this period. It should be noted that residency for each applicant has been verified through review of driver's license and a current utility bill. Said documentation is on file in the City Clerk's office. Agenda Staff Report — Housing Appointment February 16, 2005 Page 2 The following is a list of the previous applications as well as the new ones: APPLICANTS ON FILE Previous 2 ears NEW APPLICANTS Luis Aurellano Martinez Abednego Del Rosario Gloria Garcia Ahmed H. Rubaii RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council either: 1) Waive further reading, read by title only and adopt Resolution No. 2005 -003 entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 2003 - 046 APPOINTING TO OFFICE NO. 5 OF THE HOUSING COMMISSION FOR THE UN- EXPIRED TERM TO JUNE 30, 2007;" or, 2) Provide staff direction on the manner in which to proceed with filling said vacancy. Attachments 1. Resolution No. 2005 -003 2. Applications (4) Report prepared by Rosemary M. Ramirez, Chief Deputy City Clerk Attachment Resolution No. 2005-003 RESOLUTION NO. 2005-003 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 2003-046 APPOINTING TO OFFICE 5 THE HOUSING COMMISSION FOR AN UN-EXPIRED TERM TO JUNE 30, 2007 WHEREAS, on November 18, 2004, Commissioner Sally Wieck submitted a letter of resignation from Housing Commissioner, whereby creating an un-expired vacancy in Office No. 5; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park is desirous of appointing a member to fill the vacancy of Office No. 5 for the un-expired term to June 30, 2007; and WHEREAS, A public Notice of Vacancy was posted in three locations within the city and published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune on November 29, December 6 and 13th, 2004. WHEREAS, the deadline for receipt of applications was December 22, 2004. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following named person is hereby appointed as member of Office No. 5 of the Housing Commission; and such appointee shall hold office at the pleasure of the City Council and serve for the term as follows: Office 1 — B. Oscar Marin Office 2 — Mario Ventura Office 3 — Marisela Weil Office 4 — Margarita R. Vargas Office 5 — Office 6 — Rose Acosta Office 7 — Ruth Davila for the term expiring June 30, 2005 for the term expiring June 30, 2005 for the term expiring June 30, 2005 for the term expiring June 30, 2005 for the term expiring June 30, 2007 for the term expiring June 30, 2005 (Tenant Commissioner) for the term expiring June 30, 2005 (Tenant Commissioner; 62+ yrs of age) Section 2. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and forward a copy to this resolution to all appointees and to the Housing Commission Secretary. Resolution No. 2005 -003 Page 2 ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ss. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK I, ROSEMARY M. RAMIREZ, Chief Deputy City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 16th day of February, 2005, by the following vote of the Council: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ROSEMARY RAMIREZ, CIVIC CHIEF DEPUTY CITY CLERK Previous 2-year Applicant (1) RECEIVED, ❑ Re- Appointment CITY OF BALDIN .PARK New. Application APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT MAY - 7,2003,-,, -TO CITY COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES And CITY OF BALDWIN PARK STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ciTYCLERK'sDEPARTMENT Consideration of Appointment Requested for the Following Commission: PERSONAL INFORMATION: Name i t1{�i �IU�t,lArlbAk'"�ItS�2 Residence Address t�7- I" (�1�� (Et�tr �17j' i�� U^ �� /� �, GA 917olY Length of time at this Address:- Previous Address: "I,& Home Phone Nkjl%p� Message Phone Na�l� Employer_ w' Tg1xN-T Business Phone No.rt �} Date of Birth ict - Marital Status: 'S4 r4(-;;t LE Do you have Children: If yes, their ages: r4 Do you currently serve as an elected official for any board and /or agency within the City of Baldwin Park ?1J!.� YE.Ts EDUCATION: Circle Highest grade you completed: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 l� High School Graduate? b3 P09. G.E.D.? Name and Location of Colle e or University Course of StudV Degree Name of Business/Technical[Technical School Course of Stud EMPLOYMENT INFORMATION / EXPERIENCE: (Begin with your most recent experience. List all experience in last seven years) Name and Address of Em to er s Position Title Duties REFERRALS: Please provide the names of three (3) persons, who are not City of Baldwin Park Elected or Appointed Officials and who can comment on your capabilities and character. Name w Address PA-J t Phone No. DIt Ic Tbk Nf its t. �i lou A ,5, BP IN- U2 I x ,5 S M b fl. %/6-5>73I X3� cv 340cfi i vim Date _ "':, Signature .. �. ,.. .. •<' .a a ,, ..,� G Name t� S " ;. ` Lk ,�/ t' I� Commission Requested:(�}Slt . ^ �GMN�K'lt r Use this space to list your goals and objectives and why you feel you should be appointed to the commission for which you are applying. Please include any additidnal information you feel will be beneficial to the Council in consideration of your appointment to this commission. Bi LITY �QP►,t�� rsFncr r1 cr�� _ ,5T -�--Th rL��T� Jl� �F�u, L,�� rJ±a INJ,- t t-U%fs AN ACIL In OiM-, dD f{7";XS A09 DIIA66 K�; -SiP�t �`f, T!_ P c,_�t i.lh.I ts. t hI— ,I A, s,.iL 1. �. iii ._Ir n... t_ e i in nt_. .r i.l r1 ! r.t._ 1. ei_Ir 0 �Me TAVCt4 tT s is Rs 5 �Uv(M I�l r� T ,�r�+� ' ®� 71 +cam vTIC r4& t4r'! ®ate: ',,�/ Ak Le 2C�� 7 % �- Signature Notice: Please be advised that you and your qualifications may be discussed by the City Council at an open meeting. This Application and Statement of Qualification will be kept on file for two (2) years and will be considered each time a vacancy occurs in the commission for which you have requested consideration of appointment. RTP LUIS A URELI.A.N0 TVIAR`I1NE OBJECTIVE To actively contribute to the efficient administration and running of the Housing Commission Office Number 7. EXPERIENCE 2000 -2002 Baldwin Park Academic Decathlon Treasurer, President ■ Supervised and motivated team towards high standards and goals. a Organized and led regular meetings. ■ Provided an assessment of individual and cooperative progress. e Oversaw team preparation Summer 2001 City of Baldwin Park Community Development/ Redevelopment /Administration Departments Executive Assistant ■ Completed resolutions and memorandums for a number of _ redevelopment projects. ■ Prepared purchase orders and requisitions. ■ Responsible for communications paraphernalia and alphanumeric archiving 2001 -'present day Baldwin Park High School Vice Principal's Office Offl-ce Assistant ■ Controlled all facets of alphanumeric archiving for students and teachers. ■ Communicated verbal and nonverbal skills impersonal and impersonal situations with faculty, parents, and students. 2001- Present Day Baldwin Park High School Students Against Violence ® One of 14 students selected to guide and motivates student body for. violence prevention. ■ Advised via philosophical ideals of community and communication, 2001- Present Day Student Aide Math Department Chairman ■ Recorded grades for over 180 Students Personal Assistant to Supervisor: Mr. Raymond Rosso. PERSONAL INFORMATION: Residence Address— 4. 3P,-L-D\4j Length of time at this Address:_ I (a Arevious Address: `49?�l AAAW?,kQ9 NJ6 , SkrL-DU)4-� ?A-?-� Employer F-0 Business Phone No. Date of Birthj 1&3 Marital Status: Do you have Children:—]— if yes, their ages: —L Do you currently serve as an elected official for any board and/or agency within the City of Baldwin Park? NO EDUCATION: Circle Highest grade completed: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 High School Graduate? G.E.D.? N(O °~~=" %.,L-4I of Business/Technical/TecHnic-al School Course of Study EMPLOYMENT INFORMATION /EXPERIENCE: (Begin with your most recent experience. List all experience in last seven years) REFERRALS: Please provide the names of three (3) persons, who are not City o/ Baldwin Park Elected or Appointed Officials and who can comment on your capabilities and character. Name AZEDNGGO.. D51- R054?110 Commission Requested: 4OUSINCR C'OIAM)SISIO14 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS: Use this space to list your goals and objectives and why you feel you should be appointed to the commission for which you are applying. Please include any additional information you feel will be beneficial to the Council in consideration of your appointment to this commission. Date: O Si n f r P Notice: Please be advised that you and your qualifications may be discussed by the City Council at an open meeting. This Application and Statement of Qualification will be kept on file for two (2) years and will be considered each time a vacancy occurs in the commission for which you have requested consideration of appointment. �•' PERSONAL INFORMATION: Name_ (f7Gv' /'� L�192�'1✓� Residence Address %�l t�r2� i 1/ l 1i3GJ� �v ✓�iP�? ��Z� �'/ %G� Length of time at this Address: °7 y !s Previous Address: �'£' 7,e f �-zij kf Home Phone Nod� Message Phone No. Qa7�a� Employer_ Zil%/r / /grime W,-, 15 Business Phone No. Date of Birth Y _io -:Z I - Marital Status:_ Do you have Children: If yes, their ages: Do you currently serve as an elected official for any board and /or agency within the City of Baldwin Park ?� 5 EDUCATION: Circle Highest grade completed: 1 2 3 4 5 6 709 10 11 12 High School Graduate? wv G.E.D.? �J Name and Location of College or University Course of Study Degree Name of Business/Technical/Technical School Course of Stud ...,_ _ ------------ EMPLOYMENT INFORMATION / EXPERIENCE: (Begin with your most recent experience. List all experience in last seven years) Name and Address of Em to er s Position Title Duties ` �/ Zcill i rvv 1;�41 5 .V /S� jars REFERRALS: Please provide the names of three (3) persons, who are not City of Baldwin Park Elected or Appointed Officials and who can comment on your capabilities and character. Name Address Phone No. d! % 5 lle, e- 94 PL ASE ATTACH A CURRENT COPY OF A UTILITY BILL AND A COPY OF A PHOTO ID. Date Signature m Name � � j !� � C� j Commission Requested: �G'Gl� ✓, 1771 5S1p� Date. STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS: Use this space to list your goals and objectives and why you feel you should be appointed to the commission for which you are applying. Please include any additional information you feel will be beneficial to the Council in consideration of your appointment to this commission. ,7 V M ,r -� �L �/ `� cry �! i C t k57L- e V, r 402 Z2f ale ) fi� 1/7 A2 t-ue h6f Ve -117 e- r7 C Signature Notice: Please be advised that you and your qualifications may be discussed by the City Council at an open meeting. This Application and Statement of Qualification will be kept on file for two (2) years and will be considered each time a vacancy occurs in the commission for which you have requested consideration of appointment. PERSONAL INFORMATION: Name :Lu�,Gd Residence Address 3 3 Y Length of time at this Address: alo J t Previous Address: Home Phone No. n 2 L ! G �` �� d S� Message Phone No. Employer Business Phone No. Date of Birth 7- - Marital Status: )�Do you have Children: If yes, their ages: 7 Do you currently serve as an elected official for any board and /or agency within the City of Baldwin Park? !� EDUCATION: Circle Highest grade completed: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 High School Graduate? G.E.D.? Name and Location of College or University Course of StudV Degree clip Name of Business/Technical/Technical School Course of Stud EMPLOYMENT INFORMATION / EXPERIENCE: (Begin with your most recent experience. List all experience in last seven years) Name and Address of Em to er s Position Title Duties 7_&2,x y C - UU `y 72 _ l 1- Z----b - e REFERRALS: Please provide the names of three (3) persons, who are not City of Baldwin Park Elected or Appointed Officials and who can comment on your capabilities and character. Name Address Phone No. ayLo e ff t 9_, PLEASE ATTACH A CURRENT COPY OF A UTILITY BILL AND A COPY OF A PHOTO ID. Date Signature P Name A Commission Requested: STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS: Use this space to list your goals and objectives and why you feel you should be appointed to the commission for which you are applying. Please include any additional information you feel will be beneficial to the Council in consideration of your appointment to this commission. R Date: - -� Si natu te Notice: Please be advised that you and your qualifications may be discussed by the City Council at an open meeting. This Application and Statement of Qualification will be kept on file for two (2) years and will be considered each time a vacancy occurs in the commission for which you have requested consideration of appointment. City Council Agenda PURPOSE This report requests the City Council give the police department authorization to send out a notice of Request for Proposal (RFP) for a mobile, high-density storage shelving system for the department's four (4) Property & Evidence storage rooms and a notice of RFP for computer hardware and software for a property and evidence management system. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The police department is currently assessing the layout and design of the Property & Evidence storage room(s) as it relates to the temporary and long-term storage of property and evidence. It is evident that the size, design, and layout of the property room(s) has become too small for the size of the agency and the type and volume of evidence and property currently stored. Property and evidence items that come into the custody of the police department should be entered into an appropriate quality storage system in order to comply with law enforcement industry standards as outlined by the International Association for Property and Evidence (IAPE), the California Association for Property and Evidence (CAPE), and the California Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST). Therefore, the department intends to address this situation by having an authorized vendor design and install a mobile, high-density storage system, after being purchased, that will optimize storage capacity ensuring the overall integrity of the property room system. By mounting storage units on wheeled carriages that run on tracks, this system eliminates the need for fixed aisles. This would save about 50% of the floor space for other uses or doubling the capacity of existing space. A high-density storage system will have a direct impact on labor cost and will help ensure the overall integrity of the system. REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL RELATED TO AN EVIDENENCE AND PROPERTY MOBILE HIGH- DENSITY STORAGE SYSTEM Page 2 Additionally, suitable barriers will be constructed and installed by the selected vendor in order to segregate certain types of evidence and property (i.e., guns, narcotics, homicide evidence, DNA evidence, etc.) to ensure that only authorized personnel have access to the restricted areas. A proper storage system in the Property and Evidence room will make it much easier to conduct a more efficient operation. Also under assessment are the inventory, control, and management of the Property & Evidence Section. The most recent audit by Evidence Control Systems, Inc., an independent property room systems control company, highly recommended the need for a contemporary computer system, which will enable the proper management of property and evidence. A new system would address top priorities in running an efficient Property & Evidence Section in areas of time management, chain of custody, quickly retrieving information, audits and inventories, and creating reports. FISCAL IMPACT There is no negative impact to the General Fund. Staff suggests an appropriation of funds from account 150.00.2159 (evidence, found, and safekeeping currency, which is in police custody that meets the legal requirement for disposition of property and purging) for the proposed expenditures not to exceed $135,000.00. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council (1) authorize the police department to send out Request for Proposal regarding an evidence and property mobile, high - density storage system, (2) authorize the police department to send out Request for Proposal regarding a Property and Management computer system (3) authorize the Interim Finance Director to make a budget amendment in the amount not to exceed $135,000.00 from trust account 150.00.2159 and to appropriate those funds to the general fund cost center 100.24.5745, (4) direct police staff to bring any recommendations for awards of contract to the City Council for final approval Mel & AV&SIX :,V� Y 4 10 • InN&KRI TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Mark Kling, Chief of Polico(pll) DATE: February 16, 2005 M City Council Agenda Feb 16 2005 Item No.-40 Purpose To inform City Council of the current police department policy relating to Megan's Law, the various classification levels of sexual predators, and to seek direction in establishing a City policy on community notification. Background At the January 19, 2005, City Council meeting, Council requested information from the police department relative to sexual predator classification and community notification of high risk and serious offenders. At the February 2, 2005, City Council Meeting, staff informed Council that the report would be delayed due to various changes in Meagan's Law with the State's notification system that was launched via the internet in November 2004. The police department has had a Megan's Law policy in place for the past four years. The policy had been developed in accordance with the State penal code, and Department of Justice (DOJ) guidelines for dissemination of information, and is found in the police department manual § 356, entitled Megan's Law. Included in the policy is a section (356.41), specifically detailing the dissemination of information to the community, depending on the classification of the offender. It is City Council's intent to proactively develop an efficient notification process to strengthen community safety. The Council has requested that a city policy be developed to notify the community in the event a high risk, or serious offender, is released from custody, or takes up residence in the community of Baldwin Park. In addition, Council is proactively exploring development of policy to improve community notification in the event a sexually violent predator is scheduled for release into the community of Baldwin Park. MEGANS LAW UPDATE Page 2 Staff is recommending that Council review and discuss the police department's existing Megan's Law policy, and to review and comment on the newly developed draft policy. Fiscal Impact The fiscal impact is not known at this time. Recommendation Staff is recommending that Council (1) receive the police department's oral update, (2) review and comment on the newly developed draft policy that was provided to council under separate cover, (3) direct the police department to change any portion of the policy to coincide with Council's intent to proactively notify the community of a high risk or serious offender who is residing within the community, and (4) direct staff to bring back the completed policy for council review at the March 2, 2005 Council Meeting. PUBLIC COMMENTS The public is encouraged to address the City Council or any of its Agencies listed on this agenda on any matter posted on the agenda or on any other matter within its jurisdiction. If you wish to address the City Council or any of its Agencies, you may do so during the PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS period noted on the agenda. Each person is allowed five (5) minutes speaking time. A Spanish speaking interpreter is available for your convenience. COMENTARIOS DEL PUBLICO Se invita al pOblico a dirigirse al Concitio o cualquiera otra de sus Agencias nombradas en esta agenda, Para hablar sobre cualquier asunto publicado en la agenda o cualquier tema que est6 bajo sujurisdicci6n. Si usted desea la oportunidad de dirigirse al Concitio o a1guna de sus Agencias, podr6 hacerlo durante e/ periodo de Comentarios del POblico (Public Communications) anunciado en la agenda. A cada persona se /e permite hablar por cinco (5) minutos. Hay un int6rprete para su conveniencia. COMMUNITY O' MENT COMMISSION REGULAR 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL Members: Marlen Garcia, David J. Olivas, Bill Van Cleave, Vice -Chair Ricardo Pacheco and Chair Manuel Lozano ANNOUNCEMENTS PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Five (5) minute speaking time limit Cinco (5) minutos sera el limite pars hablar THIS IS THE TIME SET ASIDE TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION No action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances exist. The legislative body or its staff may: 1) Briefly respond to statements made or questions asked by persons; or 2) Direct staff to investigate and /or schedule matters for consideration at a future meeting. `Government Code §54954.2] ESTE ES EL PERIODO DESIGNADO PARA DIRIGIRSE AL COMIS16N No se podra tomar accion en algun asunto a menos que sea incluido en la agenda, o a menos que exists alguna emergencia o circunstancia especial El cuerpo legislativo y su personal podran: 1) Responder brevemente a declaraciones o preguntas hechas por personas; o 2) Dirigir personal a investigar y/o fiiar asuntos para tomar en consideracion en juntas proximas. [Codigo de Gobierno §54954.2] CONSENT CALENDAR All items listed are considered to be routine business by the Commission and will be approved with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests, in which case, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. 1. MINUTES Staff recommends Commission approve the minutes of February 2, 2005. 2. WARRANTS AND DEMANDS Staff recommends Commission receive and file the report. 3. EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATION AGREEMENT (ENA) WITH JACOBSEN FAMILY HOLDINGS FOR A RETAIL PROJECT AT DALE WOOD AND MERCED AVENUE Staff recommends Commission approve the Exclusive Negotiation Agreement with Jacobsen Family Holdings for a period of 120 -days for the potential retail development of a 5.8 -acre site at Dalewood Avenue and Merced Avenue and to accept $50,000 as a Good Faith Deposit. Community Development Commission Agenda — February 16, 2005 Page 2 4. CONCEPTUAL REVIEW BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION FOR A PROPOSED TWELVE (12) UNIT SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND COMMON LOT LOCATED WITHIN THE 01, OFFICE INDUSTRIAL ZONE (SIERRA VISTA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA); LOCATION: 819 FRAZIER STREET; CASE NO. PR 04-34; APPLICANT: D.C. CORPORATION (To be discussed concurrently with City Council Public Hearing Item No. 13) (Continued from February 2, 2005) Staff recommends Commission waive further reading, read by title only and adopt Resolution No. 408 entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION • THE CITY • BALDWIN PARK ADOPTING THE FINDINGS OF FACT AND DENYING THE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW PROPOSAL FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TWELVE (12) UNIT SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT LOCATED WITHIN THE SIERRA VISTA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA; LOCATION: 819 FRAZIER STREET; CASE NO.: PR 04-34; APPLICANT: D.C. CORPORATION." REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS ADJOURNMENT I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing agenda was posted on the City Hall bulletin board not less than 72 hours prior to the meetin ated t is 10th day of February, 2005. Rosemary M. irez, CMC Chief Deputy City Clerk PLEASE NOTE: Copies of staff reports and supporting documentation pertaining to each item on this agenda are available for public viewing and inspection at City Hall, 2nd Floor Lobby Area or at the Los Angeles County Public Library in the City of Baldwin Park. For further information regarding agenda items, please contact the office of the City Clerk at 626.960.4011, ext. 108 or 626.960.4011, ext. 466 or via e-mail at rramirezp_baidwinpark.com or InietoQbaldwinpark.com In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the Public Works Department or Risk Management at 626.960.4011. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable staff to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. (28 CFR 34.102.104 ADA TITLE 11) Community Development Commission Agenda— February 16, 2005 Page 3 CITY OF BALD IN PARK MINUTES WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 2 2005 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION ®�%�L a 1.9� Council Chambers 11403 E. Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, CA 91706 Tfn,aec� *pyM1�` COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Manuel Lozano, Chair COMMISSION AGENDA Ricardo Pacheco, Vice -Chair Marlen Garcia, Member David J. Olivas, Member Bill Van P e, e ter Maria Contreras, City Treasurer Kathryn Tizcareno; City Clerk j' 2005 • The COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION of the City of BaldwiinE REGULAR SESSION at the above time and place. ROLL CALL Present: Member Marlen Garcia, David J. Olivas, Bill Van Cleave, Vice - Chair Ricardo Pacheco and Chair Manuel Lozano Also Present: Sid Mousavi, Interim Executive Director; Stephanie Scher, Commission Attorney; Mark Kling, Chief of Police; Hennie Apodaca, Interim Finance Director; Shafique Naiyer, Public Works Director; Jack Wong, Interim Community Development & Housing Director; Manny Carrillo, Recreation and Community Services Director; Maria A. Contreras, Kathryn Tizcareno, City Clerk; Laura Nieto, Deputy City Clerk; and Rosemary M. Ramirez, Chief Deputy City Clerk Councilmember Olivas requested that the following items be removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion: Item #3 — BUXTON COMPANY COMMUNITY ID RETAIL A motion was made to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 -4 (with the exception of Item No. 3) as presented, and as follows: MOTION: Vice Chair Pacheco SECOND: Chair Lozano Carried 1. MINUTES The minutes of January 19, 2005 were approved as presented. 2. WARRANTS AND DEMANDS Commission received and filed the report. ., �. Page 1 of 1 Community Development Commission Minutes WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 2, 2005 5. CONCEPTUAL APPROVAL FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF A FAST FOOD RESTAURANT WITH A DRIVE-THRU ENCOMPASSING APPROXIMATELY 1,660 SQUARE FEET OF FLOOR AREA. LOCATION: 4312 MAINE AVENUE; APPLICANTS: EMAD NABIH AND TAHANY ISKANDER; CASE NO.: PR 04-59 (Continued from January 19, 2005) A motion was made to conceptually approve the design review proposal of a 1,600 foot fast food restaurant with a drive-thru located within the Central Business District Redevelopment Project Area provided that the project obtain tentative approval from the Design Review Committee. MOTION: Member Van Cleave SECOND: Vice Chair Pacheco Carried gL$j ZJk I M 1:8 1 k4 &I I&I q WAY • It AJOK M I Ifielk', 9];r • :• There being no other matters for discussion, the meeting was adjourned at 10:55 p.m. Approved as presented by the Commission at their meeting held February 16, 2005. Rosemary M. Ramirez, CMC Chief Deputy City Clerk UZOMEM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AGENDA -• 1i WARRANT REGISTER NO. 614 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7667 EARTHCURE, INC. RA 12209 01/26/05 4,200.00 Claim# General Description 65816 PREPARATION OF CITY WIDE BROWNFIELD INVENTORY PO# Stat Contract #Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 01 -03 -05 -001 -0 01/03/05 4,200.00 4,200.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 206- 36A -5020A 700.00 BROWNFIELD INVENTORY 202- 32A -5020A 700.00 BROWNFIELD INVENTORY 201-31A-5020A 700.00 BROWNFIELD INVENTORY 203-33A -5020A 700.00 BROWNFIELD INVENTORY 204- 34A -5020A 700.00 BROWNFIELD INVENTORY 205- 35A -5020A 700.00 BROWNFIELD INVENTORY Vend# Vendor Naw Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7667 EARTHCURE, INC. RA 012211$ 02/08/05 3,100.00 Claim# General Description 65871 PREPERATION OF CITY WIDE BROWNFIELD INVENTORY PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 01- 24 -05- 003 -003 01/24/05 31100.00 0.00 3,100.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 206-36A -5020A 516.66 BROWNFIELD INVENTORY 202 - 32A -5020A 516.66 BROWNFIELD INVENTORY 201- 31A -5020A 516.67 BROWNFIELD INVENTORY 203- 33A -502OA 516.67 BROWNFIELD INVENTORY 204 - 34A -5020A 516.67 BROWNFIELD INVENTORY 205 - 35A -5020A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 516.67 BROWNFIELD INVENTORY Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 4899 KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATE, INC. RA 012212 02/08/05 524.71 Claims# General Description 65872 DEC SERVICES FISCAL CONSULTING RPT SIERRA EXP PRJ PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0011355 01/12/05 524.71 0.00 524.71 GL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# ActCd Description 204 - 34A -5020A 524.71 DEC SERV ' VVndf Vendor Name ' Rem|t0 Payee Bank CNmk0 Chk Date Check Amount Sep 6300 OLIVER, YO0E' SANDIFER MURPHY & LE RA 012213 02/08/05 204,00 CIoim@ General Description 65874 R[DV LAWIEMINENT DOMAIN S[RV SEPT '04 ^ POI Stat Contrm±0 Invoioof Invc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Not Amount V 09/30/04 204.00 0.00 204.00 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work DrJur# ACtCd 0nooriyti0O 205'37A'5020& 204.00 SEPT '04 RDA LAW/EMINENT DOMAIN 5RV ____'_______—_--________—'_________—_-____________-_______—______-___ Vond# Vendor Hamm Romit0 Payee Bank Ch8ok# Ckk 0otu Check Amount 3oP 6905 OVERLAND PACIFIC & CUTLER, INC. RA 012214 02/08/05 5.525.00 ClaixN General Description 55873 DEC SERV RELOCATION SERV'SDERHA EXPANSION PRJ PO# Stat Contract0 Immice# Invc Dt Gross Amount DiomoDL Amt 8ioCm0t Used Not Amount 0412078 12/31/04 5'525.00 0.00 5.05.00 SL Distribution Gross Amount Work Order# AutCJ Description 200-39A-5080A 5'525.00 DEC SE8V _-_'-''-''_-_-_---_'_''''---'__-'_--''----_-_-_--__-_-_--__-_-_-'__''''_-- —''_--_'''-_-'__-_'-'' Vund# Vendor Name Romit# Payee Bank CkoCt0 Ckk Date Check Amount Soy 7583 PARAGON PARTNERS LTD RA 012215 02/0D/05 5,318.57 CIoiml General Description 65875 3RV 12/15/04-12/31/04 SIERRA EXP PRJ . POI Stat 00troot# Immioof Invc 0t SrnnS Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Not Amount 0001745 12/31/04 5.318.57 0.00 5,318.57 8L Distribution Smm Amount Work OrderV AdCd Description 206'30-5050N 5,318.57 DEC S[RV --------------------------------------- ---------- PURPOSE To enter into an Exclusive Negotiation Agreement, for a period of 90 days, with Jacobsen Family Holdings for a proposed retail project at Dalewood Avenue and Merced Avenue. BACKGROUND On December 28, 2004 and January 11, 2005, staff received development proposals from Jacobsen Family Holdings and The Festival Companies, respectively, requesting to enter into Exclusive Negotiation Agreements (ENA) with the Community Development Commission for the potential development of a block located at Dalewood Avenue, between Garden View Lane and Merced Avenue, south of the 1-10 freeway. The site is zoned Freeway Commercial (FC) and is located within the Sierra Vista Redevelopment Project Area. The two main differences between the two proposals are: 1) Project Size: Jacobson Family Holdings is proposing to redevelop the entire 5.8- acre block from Garden View Lane to Merced Avenue. The Festival Companies proposal (4.5-acres) excludes the Garden View Convalescent property; 11) Project Type: Jacobson Family Holdings is proposing a retail project while The Festival Companies is proposing a "restaurant row" project. DISCUSSION At its meeting on January 17, 2005, the Economic Development Committee reviewed the proposals submitted by The Festival Companies and Jacobsen Family Holdings for the potential development of the site. ENA with Jacobsen Family Holdings February 16, 2005 Page 2 of 2 After reviewing the two proposals, the Economic Development Committee recommended that a staff report be presented to the Community Development Commission (CDC) to consider entering into a 90-day ENA with Jacobson Family Holdings for the potential development of the 5.8-acre site. On February 2, 2005, the CDC authorized staff to proceed with the preparation of a 90-day ENA with Jacobsen Family Holdings for the potential retail project at Dalewood Avenue and Merced Avenue for consideration on February 16, 2005 by the CDC and to reduce the Good Faith Deposit to $50,000, of which $15,000 is non-refundable. The reduction is justified should the project site be reduced by the possible exclusion of one of the project site parcels. The Jacobsen Family Holdings conceptual site plan proposes a two-story 98,000 square foot retail use (showing Kohl's as a possible scenario), retail shop pad at 2,400 square feet and one casual dining restaurant of approximately 6,000 square feet. The Developer believes that potential tenants that would be interested in the site includes retailers such as Sports Chalet, Circuit City, Office Depot, Staples, Comp USA, Pet Smart and Trader Joe's. Jacobsen Family Holdings has project experience in the cities of Pasadena, Glendora, West Covina, Alhambra, San Gabriel, El Monte and most recently in the City of Duarte. Their proposal provides a list of approximately 30 projects developed or under development. On February 8, 2005, subsequent to the completion of the ENA and while this report was being completed, the developer made a second request for a reduction of the GFD (see attached letter). The developer is seeking a reduction of the non-refundable portion of the GFD from $15,000 to $10,000 and if that is not agreeable, then to increase the ENA period from 90 days to 150 days. Since the GFD has already been reduced, a possible alternative would be to extend the ENA period from 90 days to 120 days. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Community Development Commission approve the Exclusive Negotiation Agreement with Jacobsen Family Holdings for a period of 120-days for the potential retail development of a 5.8-acre site at Dalewood Avenue and Merced Avenue and to accept $50,000 as the Good Faith Deposit. Attachment #1 — Exclusive Negotiation Agreement Attachment #2 — Jacobsen Family Holdings Proposal February 8, 2005 Mr. Jack Wong, Director Baldwin Park Community Development Department 14403 East Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, Ca 91706 �; 4 2) RE: Good Faith Deposit - 5.79 acres, Dalewood/Mereed Project Dear 1�&. Wong I am very pleased that the Baldwin Park City Council has selected Affiliated Jacobsen Family Holdings as the developer for the Datewood/Merced Project, We have a team of professionals including architects, engineers, financial consultants and property acquisition agents poised to vigorously pursue this project and make it a success. We are anxious to finalize the ENA so the work can begin. In reviewing the terms of the ENA with my associates Jesse Duff- Brad Talt and Jeff Timbers, we continue to be concerned about the amount of the good faith deposit and the length of time the ENA is effective. Given the chaflengeszad-uncertainty of this project, we feel the $15,000, non-refundable portion of the deposit is trot reasonable for a 90 day ENA term. Respectfully, Affiliated Jacobsen FaMily Holdings requests a reduction in the non-refundable portion of the deposit to $10,000, In the a..Itemative, if that is, not acceptable, please consider increasing the term of the ENA to 154 days, Sincerely, Douglas Jacobsen, Principal C WY)CUMENTS AND UYN Y D( OCUMENT.WA 1.1A, INPI,,RKL)ALEIVCOD-MERC.F.r)PR(IJ V.Ct OEYQ< f IXEDUCTION1 . F TTTT? DOC: Td WdVt?:TT SOOE 60 =9+26S 606 : 'ON 3NOHd OiOHddHdOi : WOad EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATION AGREEMENT THIS EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATION AGREEMENT ("ENA") is entered into by and between the BALDWIN PARK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION, a public body, corporate and politic (the "Commission") and JACOBSEN FAMILY HOLDINGS, LLC, a California limited liability company ("Developer") under the terms and provisions set forth below. WHEREAS, in furtherance of the goals and objectives of the Redevelopment Plan for the Sierra Vista Redevelopment Project (the "Project Area"), which was adopted and amended by ordinances of the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park (the "Redevelopment Plan"), incorporated herein by this reference, and the Community Redevelopment Law of the State of California (California Health and Safety Code §§33000, et seq.), Commission and Developer desire to enter into negotiations concerning the development of certain land (defined below as the "Project Site") related to the Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, the Project Site is designated as such on the Project Site Map ("Exhibit A"); and WHEREAS, the parties recognize and acknowledge the purpose of this ENA is to provide Developer an opportunity to further develop, refine, and analyze their redevelopment proposal and to negotiate the terms of a Disposition and Development Agreement ("DDA") or an Owner Participation Agreement ("OPA"), which will accomplish the objectives described in Paragraph 1 below. NOW, THEREFORE, FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Commission and Developer hereto mutually agree as follows: 1. PURPOSE The purpose of this ENA is to provide for the negotiation by the parties of a DDA or OPA providing for, among other things, the following: A. The acquisition by Developer of the Project Site for redevelopment in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan and the General Plan and for the development and construction of a retail project with related parking (the "Proposed Development"). The development shall be subject to and consistent with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and related State Guidelines ("CEQA"). The Project Site is proposed to consist of property generally bounded by Merced Avenue, Dalewood Avenue and Garden View Lane. The Project Site is approximately 5.8 acres and consists of a total of eight (8) parcels, all of which are owned by third parties. The Project Site is completely within the Project Area. By entering into this ENA, the parties intend to implement the Redevelopment Plan and General Plan. Nothing herein shall obligate or be deemed to obligate Commission to commence any action or actions, including, but not limited to, eminent domain proceedings, for voluntary or involuntary acquisition of real or personal property, or any interest therein. The parties understand and agree Commission cannot be obligated to commence any action for acquisition or convey any interest in any portion of the Project Site to Developer, unless and until, among other legal requirements and as applicable, all necessary steps for acquisition are met, including, but not limited to, opportunities for owners to participate in the redevelopment as approved by Commission, offers to purchase, good faith negotiations, due process conducted by Commission's Board and in Commission Board's sole discretion, after duly noticed and conducted public meeting, a determination the public necessity and interest is best served by such acquisition. B. The coordination of the planning, design and construction of Proposed Development on the Project Site and to maximize its compatibility with the abutting and adjacent uses and to minimize environmental, traffic and other impacts on the abutting and adjacent uses. C. Provisions related to the City of Baldwin Park ("City") and Commission's potential assistance, if any, through disposition of property and financial participation. D. Such other provisions regarding the participation and responsibilities of the Developer and Commission necessary to further the purpose of developing the Project Site, including, but not limited to, provisions for processing approvals and permits. 2. EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO NEGOTIATE A. Commission hereby grants to Developer, and Developer hereby accepts this ENA for a period of ninety (90) days, commencing on the date this ENA is signed on behalf of Commission, and continuing in full force. With no expectation, or express or implied intent, any extension to the term of this ENA will be accepted by either party, by mutual agreement of the parties and by formal written amendment, the term of this ENA may be extended for up to an additional ninety (90) days. B. Commission and Developer agree, for the period set forth in this Paragraph 2, to negotiate diligently and in good faith to prepare a DDA or OPA to be entered into by Commission and Developer with regard to the objectives described above. During the term of this ENA, Commission agrees not to -2- negotiate for the development of the Project Site, or portion thereof, with any party other than the Developer, or approve or conduct a public hearing for any other development of the Project Site, or portion thereof. During the term of this ENA, Developer agrees as partial consideration for this ENA not to negotiate with any other party at any other property within a 5-mile radius around the Project Area for uses similar to those contemplated for the Project Site; provided, that the parties understand City and Commission must process requests for entitlements duly submitted by, or on behalf of, owners or tenants of some or all of the Project Site. 3. TERMS Commission and Developer hereby agree to the following terms: A. Negotiating Fee. Prior to Commission signing this ENA, Developer shall deposit the amount of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00) with Commission (the "Good Faith Deposit"). Fifteen Thousand Dollars ($15,000.00) of the Good Faith Deposit is non-refundable and is to compensate Commission for agreeing to the exclusivity of this ENA. The remaining Thirty-five Thousand Dollars ($35,000.00) of the Good Faith Deposit shall be retained by Commission and shall be returned to Developer upon termination of this ENA, and evidence of Developer's good faith efforts and diligence in completing its responsibilities, within thirty (30) days after Developer's written request. However, if this ENA is not approved and signed by Commission at its meeting of February 16, 2005, and staff has received Developer's Good Faith Deposit, the entire Good Faith Deposit shall be returned to Developer within thirty (30) days. B. Monthly Status Reports. On or before the tenth (10th) day of each month starting with the first full month after the effective date of this Agreement, Developer shall provide monthly status reports to Commission's Interim Assistant Executive Director in a format reasonably requested by the Interim Assistant Executive Director. These reports, at a minimum, will include status reports regarding progress associated with the schedule of performance and information regarding Developer's efforts to work with current owners and tenants on the Project Site and Developer's efforts to secure quality retail commercial tenants for the Proposed Development. C. Market Feasibility Study. Developer shall submit to Commission a market feasibility study for all aspects of the Proposed Development, including a retail specific market study and retail marketing strategy. D. Financial Feasibility 'Prospectus. Developer shall submit to Commission a pro forma showing the fiscal feasibility for all aspects of the Proposed Development. -3- E. Necessary Debt and Equity Financing. Developer shall submit evidence reasonably satisfactory to Commission, including the financing structure and preliminary commitments, demonstrating Developer can and will obtain the necessary debt and equity financing in an amount sufficient to pay for acquisition and development of the Project Site. F. Submittal and Review of Conceptual Plans. Developer shall submit to Commission conceptual plans for the development of the entire Site (the "Conceptual Plans"). Commission staff and the Economic Development Committee shall review and provide preliminary comments on the Conceptual Plans. G. Financial Investment. Commission and Developer, in entering into this ENA, have directed their respective representatives to undertake negotiations regarding the public and private investment required to accomplish the objectives intended by a proposed DDA or OPA. H. Commission's Right to Additional Information. Commission reserves the right, during the term of this ENA, to request reasonable additional information and data from Developer necessary for review and evaluation of the proposed development. Developer agrees to provide such additional information or data as requested in a timely manner. All information regarding the Developer's business practice which may be provided to Commission, shall remain confidential to the extent permissible by law. 1. Hazardous Materials. Commission shall not be responsible for conducting or financing any testing of the Project Site for hazardous materials pursuant to any applicable laws, statutes, rules and regulations. As between Commission and Developer, Developer shall also be responsible for making site conditions suitable for the Proposed Development, including, but not limited to, flood zones, Alquist-Priolo, and similar matters. For purposes of this ENA, "hazardous materials" shall mean asbestos; polychlorinated biphenyls (whether or not highly chlorinated); radon gas; radioactive materials; explosives; chemicals known to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity; hazardous waste, toxic substances or related materials; petroleum and petroleum product, including, but not limited to, gasoline and diesel fuel; those substances defined as a "Hazardous Substance", as defined by section 9601 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. 9601, et seq., or as "Hazardous Waste" as defined by section 6903 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. 6901, et seq.; an "Extremely Hazardous Waste," a "Hazardous Waste" or a "Restricted Hazardous Waste," as defined by The Hazardous Waste Control Law under sections 25115, 25117 or 25122.7 of the California Health and Safety Code, or is -4- listed or identified pursuant to section 25140 of the California Health and Safety Code; a "Hazardous Material", "Hazardous Substance," "Hazardous Waste" or "Toxic Air Contaminant" as defined by the California Hazardous Substance Account Act, laws pertaining to the underground storage of hazardous substances, hazardous materials release response plans, or the California Clean Air Act under sections 25316, 25281, 25501, 25501.1 or 39655 of the California Health and Safety Code; "Oil" or a "Hazardous Substance" listed or identified pursuant to section 311 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. 1321; a "Hazardous Waste," "Extremely Hazardous Waste" or an "Acutely Hazardous Waste" listed or defined pursuant to Chapter 11 of Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations sections 66261.1 - 66261.126; chemicals listed by the State of California under Proposition 65 Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 as a chemical known by the State to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity pursuant to section 25249.8 of the California Health and Safety Code; a material which due to its characteristics or interaction with one or more other substances, chemical compounds, or mixtures, materially damages or threatens to materially damage, health, safety, or the environment, or is required by any law or public agency to be remediated, including remediation which such law or government agency requires in order forthe property to be put to the purpose proposed by this ENA; any material whose presence would require remediation pursuant to the guidelines set forth in the State of California Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Field Manual, whether or not the presence of such material resulted from a leaking underground fuel tank; pesticides regulated under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.; asbestos, PCBs, and other substances regulated under the Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.; any radioactive material including, without limitation, any "source material," "special nuclear material," "by-product material," "low-level wastes," "high-level radioactive waste," "spent nuclear fuel" or "transuranic waste" and any other radioactive materials or radioactive wastes, however produced, regulated under the Atomic Energy Act, 42 U.S.C. 2011 et seq., the Nuclear Waste Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. 10101 et seq., or pursuant to the California Radiation Control Law, California Health and Safety Code sections 25800 et seq.; hazardous substances regulated under the Occupational Safety and Health Act, 29 U.S.C. 651 et seq., or the California Occupational Safety and Health Act, California Labor Code sections 6300 et seq.; or regulated under the Clean AirAct, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. or pursuant to The California Clean Air Act, sections 3900 et seq. of the California Health and Safety Code. Any studies and reports generated by Developer's testing for hazardous materials shall be made available to Commission upon Commission's request. J. Owner Participation Procedures. Notwithstanding this ENA, the proposed development of the Project Site remains subject to any applicable owner participation procedures. K. No Obligation by Commission or City. Nothing herein shall obligate or be deemed to obligate Commission to approve or execute a DDA or OPA, commence any actions for voluntary or involuntary acquisition of real or personal property, or any interest therein, or convey any interest in any portion of the Project Site to Developer. The parties understand and agree Commission cannot be obligated to approve or execute a DDA or OPA, commence any action for acquisition or convey any interest in any portion of the Project Site to Developer unless and until, among other legal requirements and as applicable, (i) CEQA requirements are met, (ii) all necessary steps for acquisition are met, including, but not limited to, opportunities for owners to participate in the redevelopment as approved by Commission, offers to purchase, good faith negotiations and public meetings, and (iii) a DDA or OPA satisfactory to Commission is first negotiated, executed by Developer, approved by Commission's Board and City Council, in each of their sole discretion, after duly noticed public hearing, and executed by Commission. Developer acknowledges and agrees City is not a party to this ENA. The parties each agree to negotiate in good faith to accomplish the objectives described in this ENA. L. Commission Not Responsible for Costs. Except as expressly set forth in the DDA or OPA, Commission shall not be liable for any costs associated with the planning and development of the Project Site pursuant to or arising from this ENA. M. DDA or OPA to Supersede this ENA. This ENA will be superseded by the DDA or OPA, if and when the proposed DDA or OPA is executed by Developer and approved by Commission and City in the manner required by law, and executed by Commission. N. Commission Responsible for CEQA Compliance. Commission, at Developer's costs, shall be responsible for complying with CEQA in connection with the Project Site and the development of the Project Site. Promptly following the execution of this ENA, Developer shall pay for the services of all necessary consultants to comply with CEQA requirements (including, but not limited to, the preparation and issuance of any required environmental impact report, negative declaration, or mitigated negative declaration). Developer shall cooperate fully and in a timely manner to requests for information from Commission's consultants. O. Real Estate Commissions. Neither Commission nor Developer shall be liable for any real estate commissions or brokerage fees, which may arise herefrom. Commission and Developer each represents it has not engaged a broker, agent or finder in connection with this transaction. Each party agrees to hold harmless the other party from any claim by any broker, agent or finder retained, or claimed to have been retained, by that first party. -6- P. Conflicts of Interest. For the Term of this ENA, no member, officer or employee of City or Commission, during the term of his or her service with City or Commission, shall have any direct or indirect interest in this ENA or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising, therefrom. Q. Chanqe in Ownership or Control of Developer. Developer understands Commission is entering into this ENA based on the prior experience and qualifications of Developer. Therefore, Developer shall not assign, sell or otherwise transfer any or all of its rights under this ENA to any party not owned, in the majority, or controlled by Douglas Jacobsen, without the prior written approval of Commission, at its sole discretion. R. Indemnity. Developer agrees to and hereby does defend, hold harmless and indemnify Commission, City and each of their officers, agents and employees (the "Indemnified Parties") from damages arising from Developer's acts or omissions; provided, that the obligation to defend does not apply to actions arising solely from the Indemnified Parties' acts or omissions; and provided, further, that the obligation to indemnify and hold harmless applies only to the extent damages are the result of Developer's, or Developer's agents or employees, negligent acts or omissions or willful misconduct. S. Governing Law. This ENA shall be interpreted and enforced in accordance with the provisions of California law in effect at the time it is executed, without regard to conflicts of laws provisions. T. No Third Partv Beneficiaries. Commission and Developer expressly acknowledge and agree they do not intend, by their execution of this ENA, to benefit any persons or entities not signatory to this ENA, including, without limitation, any brokers representing the parties to this transaction. No person or entity not a signatory to this ENA shall have any rights or causes of action against either Commission or Developer arising out of or due to Commission's or Developer's entry into this ENA. Commission and Developer shall meet regularly with each other in order to negotiate a proposed DDA or OPA to include, without limitation, the following provisions: A. A single master development plan comprised of one phase (scope of development) that is functional, aesthetic, and minimizes conflicts with, and is sensitive to, adjoining and adjacent properties. Architectural and site design issues to be resolved shall include, but not be limited to, acceptable architectural and landscape quality, initial size and maturity of plantings, access and circulation, determination of parcel boundaries, on-site and off- site improvements, Project Site-perimeter treatment, landscaped buffers, parking, signage, lighting, and easements, if applicable. -7- B. The design and configuration of the site plan shall maximize the potential to attract national credit retail tenants, comparable in national /regional stature, and business volume, as those identified in Exhibit "B ". C. The acquisition procedures that may include use of eminent domain, the time schedule for conveyance, if any, of portions of the Project Site from Commission, the financing plan, and the cost of the Project Site. D. The timing and conditions precedent for the conveyance, if any, of the Project Site or portions thereof. E. The performance guarantees, amount of liquidated damages, and good faith deposit to be required. The proposed DDA or OPA shall require Developer to pay when due, on all those parcels owned by Developer, all taxes, assessments, and special taxes levied on the Project Site and all debt service on all bonds outstanding from time to time which have a lien or encumbrance on the Project Site. Any deposit shall be returned to Developer upon the completion of the development as evidenced by a Certificate of Completion issued by Commission. F. A schedule of performance encompassing appropriate and necessary legal, administrative, financial and construction benchmarks to be met by the appropriate party. G. The responsible party to prepare a subdivision tract map subdividing the Project Site into parcels as appropriate and necessary. H. The responsible party for all costs associated with the removal or remediation of any potentially hazardous materials from the Project Site and demolition of all improvements on the Project Site. I. Ownership of all plans, drawings and specifications prepared by Developer in the event of termination of the DDA or OPA. J. Appropriate controls to limit the use of the Project Site, including, but not limited to, Commission, or its representative having the right of pre - approval of all tenants entering into leases on the Project Site, to ensure the uses meet the criteria set forth in Exhibit B, and retaining that right forthe length of time the Redevelopment Plan remains effective. K. Operational and maintenance plans for the development, including the parking. L. A financing plan to address any financial participation, if any, by Commission, City, and any other public agency. 8- 5. LIMITATION ON REMEDIES FOR BREACH OR DEFAULT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS A. Neither party would have agreed to any part of this ENA if it were to be liable to the other party for any amount of monetary damages. Accordingly, both parties acknowledge and agree each party's exclusive right and remedy upon any breach or default of the other party to negotiate in good faith, as set forth in this ENA, is to terminate this ENA or seek specific performance regarding the exclusivity provisions of this ENA, as applicable. The prevailing party in any action brought pursuant to this subparagraph A. shall also be entitled to an award of reasonable attorney's fees and costs. B. Each party acknowledges it is aware of the meaning and legal effect of California Civil Code Section 1542, which provides: A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by him would have materially affected his settlement with the debtor. C. Civil Code Section 1542 notwithstanding, it is the parties' intention to be bound by the limitation on remedies set forth in this Section, and each party hereby releases any and all claims against the other party for monetary damages or other legal or equitable relief, whether or not such released claims were known or unknown to the releasing party as of its entry into this ENA. Each party hereby waives the benefits of Civil Code Section 1542 and all other statutes and judicial decisions (whether state or federal) of similar effect. Commission Initials Developer Initials Commission shall have the right to terminate this ENA in the event Developer proposes provisions in the proposed DDA or OPA, which materially vary from the development generally described in Paragraph 1 of this ENA. Commission's right of termination shall be subject to a fifteen-day (15-day) notice. Developer shall have the right to terminate this ENA in the event Commission proposes provisions in the proposed DDA or OPA, which materially vary from those described in this ENA. Developer's right of termination shall be subject to a fifteen-day (15- day) notice. 8. NOTICES. A. Any notice, request, approval or other communication to be provided by either party shall be in writing and dispatched by first class mail, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return-receipt requested, or by electronic facsimile transmission followed by delivery of a "hard" copy, or by personal delivery (including by means of professional messenger service, courier service such as United Parcel Service or Federal Express, or by U.S. Postal Service), to the addresses of Commission and Developer set forth below. Such written notices, requests, approvals or other communication may be sent in the same manner to such other addresses as either party may from time to time designate. B. Any notice that is transmitted by electronic facsimile transmission followed by delivery of a "hard" copy, shall be deemed delivered upon its transmission; any notice personally delivered (including by means of professional messenger service, courier service such as United Parcel Service or Federal Express, or by U.S. Postal Service), shall be deemed received on the documented date of receipt; and any notice that is sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return-receipt requested shall be deemed received on the date of receipt thereof. C. If to Commission: Baldwin Park Community Development Commission Attn: Interim Executive Director 14403 East Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, California 91706 Telephone 626.960.4011, ext. 482 Facsimile 626.337.2965 With a copy to: Kane, Ballmer & Berkman Attn: Joseph W. Pannone 515 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 1850 Los Angeles, California 90071-3301 Telephone 213.617.0480 Facsimile 213.625.0931 -10- D. If to Developer: Jacobsen Family Holdings Attn: Douglas Jacobsen 4733 Westchester Drive Woodland Hills, CA 91364 Telephone 818.340.6961 Facsimile 818.340.1965 9. COUNTERPART ORIGINALS. This ENA may be executed in two (2) counterpart originals which, when taken together, shall constitute but one and the same instrument. 10. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This ENA represents the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes all negotiations or previous agreements between the parties with respect to development of the Project Site. This ENA may not be amended unless agreed as such in writing and certified by the signatures of the parties hereunder. 11. EFFECTIVE DATE The effective date of this ENA shall be the date it is signed on behalf of Commission. Dated: APPROVED AS TO FORM: KANE, BALLMER & BERKMAN General Counsel - 11 - By: Manuel Lozano, Chairman Ao fair V- -1 U EXHIBIT B Retail uses to be operated on the Project Site shall be limited to businesses, which generate sales taxes (some of which are payable to City), such as Kohls, Office Depot, CompUSA, Staples, Sports Chalet, Circuit City, Bed Bath and Beyond, Comp USA, Barnes & Noble, Borders, REI, Lazy Boy, Macaroni Grill, Mimi's Cafk Olive Garden, Buca di Beppo, Acapulco's, Island's and similar businesses; provided, that Developer may seek and rely upon a written determination from Agency's Executive Director whether a retail use proposed by Developer complies with these criteria. 4733 Westchester Drive, Woodland Hills, CA 91364 Jacobsen Email. douglas(kiacobsenholdings.com Family Phone (310) 505-1954 Phone (818) 340-6961 HOOV Fax (818) 340-1965 December 27, 2004 Mr. Jack Wong, Director Baldwin Park Community Development Commission 14403 East Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, Ca 91706 RE: 5.79 acres, Dalewood[Mereed Project Dear Mr. Wong: Affiliated Jacobsen Family Holdings 1, LLC is extremely interested in pursuing the redevelopment of the 5.79 acres at Dalewood and Merced in the City of Baldwin Park. Our local real estate development projects include the design and development of the Staples Office Supplies store in Pasadena, the Hollywood Video in Glendora, the Stater Brothers/Savon/Starbucks Center in West Covina, the Office Depot/Blockbuster center in Alhambra, the Longs Drugs Shopping Center in San Gabriel, the CVS Drug Store in El Monte and the new Savon in southwest Pasadena. Our most recent effort, a 3.5 acre retail project that includes IHOP, La-Z-Boy Furniture Gallery, and 12,000 square feet of retail shops, is currently under construction at the intersection of Mountain Avenue and Hamilton Road in Duarte. Our shop tenants include Panda Express, Payless Shoesource, EB Games, Verizon, Great Clips, etc. After carefully researching the commercial development potential of the Dalewood/Merced site, we feel we can help the City/Agency achieve its future plans to redevelop this area into an extension of the new, high quality destination retail north of the 10 Freeway. We have attached a conceptual plan that demonstrates that the site can accommodate up to 90,000 square feet of retail space including the development of at least one casual dining restaurant of approximately 5,000 square feet. Our plan is to engage the architectural firm of K.L Charles & Associates to design an open-air, pedestrian friendly shopping center. The project would provide an opportunity for tenants to move into this underutilized property and create a shopping and dining convenience for area residents, as well as, securing new sales tax sources. We feel this project offers numerous benefits to the continuing revitalization of the area by: creating a fresh, new esthetic feel through the 10 Freeway view corridor. Additionally, the project will serve to compliment the existing destination Home Depot and Wal-Mart Centers. C:\DOCLTMFNTS AND SETTINGSUEFF TR%dBERS\WDOCLTNffiNTS\IROLTTE66\]M BROCHURE\BALDWIN PARK DALEWOOD-MERCED PROJECT LETTER-DOC 5.59 acres, Dalewood/Merced Project December 27, 2004 Page 2 4733 Westchester Drive, Woodland Hills, CA 91364 Email. douglas(4jacobsenholdings.eom Phone (310) 505-1954 Phone (818) 340-6961 Fax (818) 340-1965 Given the complexity of coordinating the required pre-leasing commitment with the timing of the property acquisition, the Planning/Entitlement/Zoning issues, and the recordation of the parcel map, we feel the only viable method to pursue this project would be with the cooperation and assistance of the City's Redevelopment Agency. We anticipate this development opportunity can be realized provided 1) the property is zoned for commercial/retail development, 2) the total cost to acquire the land is reasonably close to the market value (validated by an appraisal), and 3) the overall project return is reasonably acceptable to a third party developer. Accordingly, we respectfully request the opportunity to obtain a ninety day Exclusive Negotiating Agreement in order to immediately begin the Disposition and Development Agreement process. Our intent would be to enter into a DDA that would provide us adequate time to meet our pre-leasing commitment while obtaining the necessary Planning and Entitlement approvals prior to taking title to the property. Our goal is to have the project break ground by summer, 2006. Our team is available to meet with City officials to further discuss this proposed project and to answer any questions you may have. To better acquaint you with the team, I have enclosed brief resumes. Please contact us after you have had an opportunity to review our proposal. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Douglas Jacobsen Principal Enclosures: Conceptual Site Plan Potential Tenant List Team Profile CADOCUNIENTS AND SETTINGSVEFF TINMERSMY DOCUNMNTS\IROUTE66VF14 BROCHURE\BALDWIN PARK DALEWOOD-NIERCED PROJECT LETTERDOC r �s r9 � +mss QN Ilk, lk v g w �U) n pq G p N • \• �ul d �m %---A11 Z r N D / s ,ow, m tai r 1. Kohl's* 2. Sports Chalet 3. Circuit City 4. Pacific Sales 5. Office Depot 6. Staples 7. Bed Bath and Beyond 8. Sit IN Sleep 9. White Cap Industries (Home Depot), 10. Comp USA 11. PetSmart 12. Trader Joe's 13. Longs 14. Major Auto Rental /Sales a. Budget b. Enterprise *Site plan shows 2 story, 98,000 sq.ft. Kohl's as a possible scenario. RI-2 A limited Partnership affiliated with Jacobsen Family Holdings, Douglas C. Jacobsen, CEO. Mr. Jacobsen was previously a principal of the well-known Western U.S. development company, Realty Bancorp Equities. At RBE, Mr. Jacobsen was the Partner in charge of every facet of development. Projects Completed or Under Development include projects by Jacobsen Family Holdings, Realty Bancorp Equities, and JFH affiliated partnerships: Projects I thru 16 are owned & managed by Jacobsen Family Holdings 1) Duarte South Shopping Center; Lazy Boy, IHOP and 12,025 Sq. Ft of Shops, Under Construction for Completion April, 2005. 2) San Gabriel Gateway; Longs anchored Shopping Center; 15,000 Sq. Ft. Longs Drugs and 13,000 Sq. Ft. of Shops (Fully Entitled; in Design)-2005 project. 3) El Monte/SWC Peck & Lower Azusa- 13,000 Sq. Ft. CVS Drug Store; 2005 4) Corona; Sav-on Drug Store (Albertson's); 16,689 square feet; Bank of America; ATM Drive Through 5) Stockton; Safeway/Safeway Gas/Shops; 65,000 square foot shopping center 6) Stockton; Big Lots/Blockbuster; 33,600 square foot shopping center 7) Pasadena; Pacific Clinics; 22,600 square foot medical bldg — Single Tenant 8) Apple Valley; 16 Acres of Land to be developed as a Home Depot Center 9) Grand Terrace; 2 Acres of Land to be developed a Sav-on Drug Store and 3,000 Sq. Ft. shops; Fully Entitled, Construction start January 2005. 10) Grand Terrace; 18 acre Redevelopment project; Proposed Lowe's and Stater Bros. 11) Glendora; Hollywood Video; 4,836 square feet — Single Tenant (now Sold) 12) Agoura Hills; Teradyne (2 Story Office Bldg) — 103,000 square feet — Single Tenant 13) Corona; Wendy's International Inc.; 3,184 square feet — Single Tenant Drive Through 14) Modesto; Petco Pet Supplies; 17,700 square feet — Single Tenant 15) Norco; ARCO AM/PM Mini Mart — plus future development shops. 16) Redlands; Walgreens/Ranch Market; 80,000 Sq. Ft. shopping center Projects 17 through 27 are owned by RBE Affiliated companies 17) Glendora; Sav-on Drug Store; 26,884 square foot shopping center 18) Agoura; Line 6 Systems; 7 acre R&D park 19) Alhambra; Office Depot/Blockbuster; 31,006 square feet (Office Depot now Sold) 20) Pasadena; Sav-on Drug Store; 14,884 square feet — Single Tenant 21) Redlands; Walgreens/Ranch Market/Howie's Pizza; 66,000 square foot shopping center 22) Riverside; Sav-on Drug Store; 16,640 square feet — Single Tenant 23) Santa Fe Springs; Sav-on/McDonalds; 29,000 square foot shopping center 24) TuJunga; Sav-on/McDonalds/IHOP; 44,000 square foot shopping center 25) Van Nuys; Los Angeles Unified School District; 7.5 Acre Bus Depot 26) Van Nuys; Hydra Warehousing; 11.5 Acre Industrial Park — Single Tenant 27) West Covina; Sav-on/Stater Bros/Starbucks; 106,000 square foot shopping center PROJECTS DEVELOPED AND SOLD 28) Pasadena; Staples Office Supply Superstore; 24,027 square feet (now Sold) 29) Thousand Oaks; Conexant Systems; 16 acre R&D park (now Sold) Project Details and Pictures Available on our web site - http://vAvw.jacobsenholdings.com/ • Mike Reed, Albertson's/Sav-on Drugs Real Estate Department: 714-300-6303 • Brandon Farrell, Safeway's Real Estate Department: 925-467-2617 • Norman Morales, Vineyard Bank — Chief Executive Officer: 909-987-0177 • Marchell Hilliard, Bank of America Vice President - Relationship Manager: 213-228- 5086 • Janine Peck, Loan Officer/Underwriter, Wells Fargo Private Mortgage Banking: 818- 889 -3018 ��, r. ,Ir DOUGLAS C. JACOBSEN - douglas @jacobsenholdings.com ® In 1998, Douglas Jacobsen and Dr. Dennis Jacobsen formed the real estate development company, Jacobsen Family Holdings. Prior to JFH, Mr. Jacobsen was a principal of the well -known Western U.S. development company, Realty Bancorp Equities. At RBE, Mr. Jacobsen was the Partner in charge of every facet of development, from site acquisition to anchor leasing, from entitlements to construction. Before forming Realty Bancorp Equities, LLC in 1994, Douglas Jacobsen was President of the West Los Angeles division of Lee & Associates, a national real estate brokerage firm. 11"?WDLEY :.111_ _ n . • Principal of B.A.T. Ventures, formed in 2002 to develop and hold Commercial Retail Properties. Before forming B.A.T. Ventures, Brad was a Commercial Real Estate Broker First Vice President CB Richard Ellis, Los Angeles — Retail Division, from 1983 to 2002. During his tenure with CB Richard Ellis, Brad Talt worked exclusively within the San Gabriel Valley market; building up sales, leasing and development transactions in excess of twenty million square feet and 500 Million dollars. JEFFREY C. TIMBERS - jtimh17 @ade1phia.net • Prior to joining JFH Retail Development partners, Jeff Timbers spent the last 20+ years as a Real Estate Executive in Southern California with several high profile retail companies, with extensive development experience, including 1995 -2003, Albertson's /Sav -on Drug; 1991 -1995, Pic'N'Save Stores; 1987 -1991, Thrifty Drug Stores and 1983 -1987, Payless Shoe Stores. Prior to that, Jeff spent 10 years in various Finance positions with May Department Stores. JESSE H. DUFF Muff0waol.com • The newest member of the JFH Retail Development Partners team; Jesse Duff recently retired as City Manager of the City of Duarte, serving as City Manager and Executive Director of the Redevelopment Agency for 17 years and in various capacities with the city for over 25 years. During his tenure with the city, Mr. Duff presided over the Development /Redevelopment of over 1.5 million Sq. Ft. of commercial and industrial space, including Retailers Wal -mart, Target, Staples, Ralph's; and Nissan, Ford, Mitsubishi and Car -Max automobile dealerships, resulting in the increase of over 350% of taxable sales in the city. © t I&L San Gabriel Glendora Ho kyrim, PRO ^��`� ~�� \\ A U R--A San Gabriel Glendora Ho kyrim, PRO A U R--A San Gabriel Glendora Ho kyrim, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AGENDA TO: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Commission v4h FROM: Jack Wong, Director of Community Dev *ent and Housing DATE: February 16, 2005 SUBJECT: Continued from February 2, 2005; Conceptual review by the Community Development Commission for a proposed twelve (12) unit single-family detached planned development and common lot located within the 01, Office Industrial Zone (Sierra Vista Redevelopment Project Area); Location: 819 Frazier St.; Case No.: PR 04-34; Applicant: D. C. Corporation. PURPOSE This item is before you for conceptual review only. Should the Commission approve this project in concept, the applicant must still obtain all necessary City permits, approvals andlor entitlements, as they apply in proceeding with the project development. This report requests conceptual denial by the Community Development Commission for a proposed single family detached planned development with common lot. This property is located within the Sierra Vista Redevelopment Project Area and the Redevelopment Plan requires that any new construction be reviewed and conceptually approved by the Redevelopment Agency prior to the issuance of any building permits. MAMA The Planning Division has completed an environmental analysis of the project and has recommended that the City Council issue a negative declaration. That consideration will be made by the City Council the night this matter is heard by the Commission. SUBJECT PROPERTY I The subject property has a current General Plan Land Use designation of Single-Family Residential and is inconsistently zoned 01, Office Industrial. The property is irregular in shape and contains approximately 31,887 square feet (.73 acres) of net area. The total site area is essentially flat and contains an existing single-family residence, which will eventually be demolished. The adjacent zoning and land uses are listed in the table below. Conceptual Approval PR 04-34 Paqe 2 of 3 Table 1 Adiacent Zoni and Use Adjacent Property Location Zoning Property Use North 1-10 FWY San Bernardino Freeway South R-1 Single-Family Residences East R-1 Single-Family Residences West Athol St. Overpass — R-1 Single-Family Residences Currently, there is an existing billboard on the property that will result in an overhang onto a residential property (Lot #7). This billboard will be highly visible from the residences thereby creating a non-conducive living environment and exposure to continual illumination during the evening hours. The Applicant has not addressed issues concerning maintenance of the billboard. DISCUSSION This conceptual review request is for the construction of a twelve (12) unit single-family detached planned development and common lot. In order for the development to take place, the applicant has requested approval by the City Council to redesignate and rezone the property from single-family residential to multi-family residential. These entitlement requests, which also include an additional zone change to add the planned development overlay, a zone variance to allow less than the minimum required amount of guest parking spaces and a tentative tract map, will be heard by the City Council on February 2, 2005. The requested General Plan amendment does not compliment the subject properties nor is the proposed zoning in compliance with the newly updated General Plan without such an amendment. The zone change will also create a situation that is called "spot zoning", in that a small area of land will be zoned in a manner incompatible with the immediate R-1 zoned and single-family residential designated properties surrounding it. Therefore, staff is recommending that the General Plan amendment and zoning requests, to be heard by the City Council, be denied based on incompatibility with the adjacent single-family residential uses. At the December 16, 2004 Planning Commission Meeting, the Commission recommended that the City Council deny all requested entitlements for the proposed development. Some of the Commission concerns were as follows: - Potential unsafe traffic conditions as a result of the entrance to the project being in close proximity to the Frazier St. off ramp. - Deficient in guest parking spaces. - Density is too high. - Limited amount of usable private open space. Conceptual Approval PR 04-34 Paqe 3 of 3 If the City Council denies the General Plan amendment and zone change, the conceptual approval should be denied by the Commission, as the necessary finding of consistency with the General Plan and zoning cannot be made. 1. That the proposed improvements will not be compatible with the standards and other requirements set forth in the Sierra Vista Redevelopment Plan and the design proposed by the Commission in that the proposed development is not consistent with the City's General Plan, or the existing zoning on the site. Proposed changes to those standards are not compatible with the surrounding single-family residential zoning designations and uses; and 2. That the proposed improvements would require a modification in design features in order to meet the requirements of the Sierra Vista Redevelopment Plan and the Design Guidelines for the Sierra Vista Redevelopment Project Area to comply with the permitted density of development; and 3. That the Applicant has not entered into an agreement with the Commission for the development of said improvements. ATTACHMENTS I • #1 Vicinity Map • #2 Resolution No. 408 Report Prepared By: Salvador Lopez Jr., Associate PlannerA_ 31 ® �\ / 1293 / 3116 3029 ® ® 12910 12318 3077 ® ® 2330 32 129 12961 3021 ® ■ 293 29�� 12969 1 ® ■ ® 3011 ® r 12946 ® ! 3025 1: ® ® ®� 13011 `C 12905 12911 12921 ®� 1 29 296 12971 12999 VI Islas ()1 12843 ®�Q 12963 12819 it WOONO ■ SERNAO j_jO SAN ■ ® ® ' ,.■■'' °® 00000 ♦ 1301 12911`' ♦ ® 130 130 92 13) anm Conceptual Approval ; A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ADOPTING THE FINDINGS OF FACT AND DENYING THE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW PROPOSAL FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TWELVE (12) UNIT SINGLE- FAMILY DETACHED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT LOCATED WITHIN THE SIERRA VISTA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA; LOCATION: 819 FRAZIER STREET; CASE NO.: PR 04-34; APPLICANT: D.C. CORPORATION. WHEREAS, the property described herein is located within the Sierra Vista Redevelopment Project Area and the Redevelopment Plan requires that any new construction be reviewed and conceptually approved by the Community Development Commission prior to the issuance of any building permits; and WHEREAS, an application ("Application") for Design Review was submitted on behalf of the owners of certain real property, located at 819 Frazier Street in the City of Baldwin Park; and WHEREAS, the Design Review Application is requesting conceptual approval to allow the construction of a twelve (12) unit single-family detached planned development, pursuant to the Sierra Vista Redevelopment Plan. THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION • THE CITY • BALDWIN PARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the Community Development Commission of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby find, determines, and declare as follows: a) That an application for Design Review was submitted on behalf of the owners of certain real property, located at 819 Frazier Street in the City of Baldwin Park, described more particularly in the Application on file with the Planning Division; and b) That the Design Review application is requesting conceptual approval to allow the construction of a twelve (12) unit single-family detached planned development, pursuant to the Sierra Vista Redevelopment Plan; and c) That on February 16, 2005, the Community Development Commission, based upon evidence presented including applicable staff reports and each member of the Commission being familiar with the properties, it was determined that the facts as required by the Sierra Vista Resolution 408 Page 2 Redevelopment Plan, for the granting of such Applications are present and that the Design Review proposal should be denied. SECTION 2. That the Design Review proposal, as herein described be and the same hereby is approved subject to the following findings. a) That the proposed improvements will not be compatible with the standards and other requirements set forth in the Sierra Vista Redevelopment Plan and the design proposed by the Commission in that the proposed development is not consistent with the City's General Plan, or the existing zoning on the site. Proposed changes to those standards are not compatible with the surrounding single-family residential zoning designations and uses; and b) That the proposed improvements would require a modification in design features in order to meet the requirements of the Sierra Vista Redevelopment Plan and the Design Guidelines for the Sierra Vista Redevelopment Project Area to comply with the permitted density of development; and c) That the Applicant has not entered into an agreement with the Commission for the development of said improvements. SECTION 3. This conceptual denial shall not constitute approval by the Community Development Commission of any funding of or monetary participation in this project, nor shall it be deemed to be a waiver by the Community Development Commission of any right or power, which is otherwise available to the Commission. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and forward a copy hereof to the Secretary of the Community Development Commission and the Applicant. PASSED AND APPROVED this 16 th day of February 2005. Resolution 408 Page 3 ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SS. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK I, ROSEMARY M. RAMIREZ, Chief Deputy City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution 408 was duly and regularly approved and adopted by the Community Development Commission of the City of Baldwin Park at a regular meeting thereof, held on February 16, 2005 by the following vote: AYES: MEMBER: NOES: MEMBER: ABSENT: MEMBER: ABSTAIN: MEMBER: ROSEMARY M. RAMIREZ, CIVIC CHIEF DEPUTY CITY CLERK LL 12 X 14 A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ADOPTING THE FINDINGS OF FACT AND DENYING THE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW PROPOSAL FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TWELVE (12) UNIT SINGLE- FAMILY DETACHED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT LOCATED WITHIN THE SIERRA VISTA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA; LOCATION: 819 FRAZIER STREET; CASE NO.: PR 04-34; APPLICANT: D.C. CORPORATION. WHEREAS, the property described herein is located within the Sierra Vista Redevelopment Project Area and the Redevelopment Plan requires that any new construction be reviewed and conceptually approved by the Community Development Commission prior to the issuance of any building permits; and WHEREAS, an application ("Application") for Design Review was submitted on behalf of the owners of certain real property, located at 819 Frazier Street in the City of Baldwin Park; and WHEREAS, the Design Review Application is requesting conceptual approval to allow the construction of a twelve (12) unit single-family detached planned development, pursuant to the Sierra Vista Redevelopment Plan. THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION • THE CITY • BALDWIN PARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE • FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the Community Development Commission of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby find, determines, and declare as follows: a) That an application for Design Review was submitted on behalf of the owners of certain real property, located at 819 Frazier Street in the City of Baldwin Park, described more particularly in the Application on file with the Planning Division; and b) That the Design Review application is requesting conceptual approval to allow the construction of a twelve (12) unit single-family detached planned development, pursuant to the Sierra Vista Redevelopment Plan; and c) That on February 16, 2005, the Community Development Commission, based upon evidence presented including applicable staff reports and each member of the Commission being familiar with the properties, it was determined that the facts as required by the Sierra Vista Resolution 408 Page 2 Redevelopment Plan, for the granting of such Applications are present and that the Design Review proposal should be denied. SECTION 2. That the Design Review proposal, as herein described be and the same hereby is approved subject to the following findings. a) That the proposed improvements will not be compatible with the standards and other requirements set forth in the Sierra Vista Redevelopment Plan and the design proposed by the Commission in that the proposed development is not consistent with the City's General Plan, or the existing zoning on the site. Proposed changes to those standards are not compatible with the surrounding single-family residential zoning designations and uses; and b) That the proposed improvements would require a modification in design features in order to meet the requirements of the Sierra Vista Redevelopment Plan and the Design Guidelines for the Sierra Vista Redevelopment Project Area to comply with the permitted density of development; and c) That the Applicant has not entered into an agreement with the Commission for the development of said improvements. SECTION 3. This conceptual denial shall not constitute approval by the Community Development Commission of any funding of or monetary participation in this project, nor shall it be deemed to be a waiver by the Community Development Commission of any right or power, which is otherwise available to the Commission. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and forward a copy hereof to the Secretary of the Community Development Commission and the Applicant. PASSED AND APPROVED this 16th day of February 2005. Resolution 408 Page 3 ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) SS. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ) I, ROSEMARY RAMIREZ, Chief Deputy City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution 408 was duly and regularly approved and adopted by the Community Development Commission of the City of Baldwin Park at a regular meeting thereof, held on February 16, 2005 by the following vote: AYES: MEMBER: NOES: MEMBER: ABSENT: MEMBER: ABSTAIN: MEMBER: ROSEMARY RAMIREZ, CIVIC CHIEF DEPUTY CITY CLERK 41109•I+ To approve a contract with the Buxton Company to provide retail marketing analysis within the City. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: At the February 2, 2005 meeting, Community Development Commission requested that a presentation by Buxton Company on the Community ID analysis be added to the February 16, 2005 CDC agenda. As instructed by CDC at the February 2, 2005 meeting, staff has further contacted Community ID clients regarding their experience with the company (Attachment "D"). The clients expressed a high level of satisfaction with the work performed for their cities by the Buxton Company. They noted that the work performed was exactly what their cities needed to attract quality retailers. Furthermore, the results of the study have enabled most of the cities to secure a number of retailers identified by the Buxton Company to a specific site. For example, the City of Lancaster has been successful in the attraction of national credit tenants such as Lowe's Home Improvement and Wal-Mart. The City of Paramount has been successful in attracting the attention of Office Depot to locate within the City. In addition, the City of Duncanville, Texas in partnership with a developer acquired a 28-acre site to develop a $30 million mix-use retail/multifamily project. The CDC also requested a comparison between the Community ID proposal with Downtown/ Main Street Visions ("DMSV") Retail Analysis, completed in July 22, 2002 (Attachment "E"). The DMSV report focused on demographic conditions, comparative retail purchasing power and actual retail sales for the year 2000. DMSV suggested a retail mix of chain stores based on store size and site requirements and recommended additional steps towards the attraction of retail tenants. The recommended steps included a preparation of cash flow analysis for targeted retailers, promotional materials, contacts with retail brokers, and attendance and participation at the International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC). While DMSV's report lists a mix of potential chain stores for the downtown, the Community ID analysis proposes to identify twenty (20) specific retail Buxton Community ID Staff Report February 16, 2005 Page 2 of 3 tenants based on trade area, product demand and site conditions and will provide marketing packages for the specific retail targets. The Community ID data is more current and will update the information presented in DMSV's report. Previously, at the January 19, 2005 meeting, City Council requested clarification between the services provided by Buxton and the services to be provided as a part of the image campaign. While the image campaign will include market research, the data collected will be swayed towards perceptions of the City, satisfaction with City services, and expectations of the City. This data will complement the information to be generated by Buxton which will consist of quantitative data that will match the spending power and shopping preferences of the City's market area specifically with nationally recognized businesses based on their spending requirements. The proposed image campaign consultant has been contacted regarding the services Buxton is proposed to provide and agrees that the data available from Buxton will compliment the data to be collected through the image campaign. Community ID is an economic planning tool used to effectively analyze local and regional trends. The Community ID analysis will present site-specific data that will assist future project development. The analysis will provide information and deliverables that can be used to successfully attract the desired mix of business tenants to Baldwin Park, sustaining thereafter the essential goal of long-term growth. Community ID is a two-phase process: (1) Retail Potential and Retail Site Determination, 2) Identification of Retail Matches for the Site, accompanied by retail recruiting packages. The deliverables will provide data on customer purchasing habits, lifestyles, and information of trade areas and businesses. The data obtained will be further analyzed to provide specific retailer matches. A marketing package containing specific data on the City of Baldwin Park and on the particular retail site will be mailed to each of the twenty identified retailers. The consultant will make the initial contact prior to City contact. Descriptions of the two Community ID phases and what they entail, follows: Phase I (Attachment "B") — Retail Potential and Retail Site Determination: ■ identification of the potential retail zones analysis of the viability for retail development in each identified zone and its trade area. Factors considered include, but are not limited to: • analysis of psychographics and demographics of households • identification of product demand and drive time trade area • analysis of existing retail and retail trends • growth plans and relevant developments recommendation of the retail site and trade area with the most potential discussion and approval of a site with which to proceed for retail matching CAW1NDOWS\Desktop\Buxton Agreement\CommunityiDProposai3.doc Buxton Community ID Staff Report February 16, 2005 Page 3 of 3 Phase 11 (Attachments "B") — Identification of Retail Matches for the Site: ■ comparison and analysis of existing similar local and regional trade areas ■ identification of preliminary target list of matching retailers and determination of recommended list ■ research reports (household profiles, dominant household segments) ■ discussion and approval of final list of matching retailers ■ publishing of a marketing binder that can be used to attract potential tenants ■ delivery of retailer specific marketing packages that can be used to market the community to the prospective retail tenant or developer The League of California Cities endorses Community ID and sponsors quarterly workshops on the program. The list of Buxton Company references includes the cities of Paramount, Perris and Lancaster among others. (Attachment "C") jamou, 0 The City of Baldwin Park is eligible to receive a ten (10) percent discount if the agreement is executed prior to the expiration date of February 28, 2005. If approved by the City Council prior to February 28, 2005 the fees for this assignment will be $63,000. The funding for this analysis has been allocated from the following City accounts: 1. $34,600 - Community Development Commission/Redevelopment 2. $17,900 - Community Image Campaign (AB 1693 Funds) 3. $10,500 - Baldwin Park Chamber of Commerce (AB 1693 Funds) 0 1 WIN 9 M i" Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Buxton Community ID Retail Analysis Proposal and Contract (Attachment "A") in the amount of $63,000. Attachment "A" — The Buxton Community ID Proposal and Contract Attachment "B" — Phase I- Retail Potential and Retail Site Determination — Phase 11- Identification of Retail Matches for the Site Attachment "C" — Client References Attachment "D" — List of Contacted Clients Attachment "E" — Downtown/ Main Street Visions Retail Analysis REPORT PREPARED BY: Maribel Aldana, Economic Development Consultant CAW1ND0WS\Desktop\Buxton Agreement\CommunityiDProposal3.doc Buxton Community ID Staff Report February 16, 2005 Page 4 of 3 Communityu Buxton appreciates the opportunity to propose its services to the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission. The objective of this proposal is to summarize and outline the comprehensive scope of work Buxton will provide as the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission pursues its retail attraction and expansion goals. Please note that in this proposal the term "retail" is inclusive of restaurants. Utilizing data, methods and proprietary technologies developed specifically for matching retailers with communities; Buxton will assess the potential for the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission to recruit and expand its retail sector, and will identify and provide marketing packages for specific retail targets. Buxton's initial analysis of up to three (3) distinct retail locations, selected by the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission, will yield a recommendation of the site best positioned for retail recruitment. With that recommendation, the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission will make a final determination of the retail site to be selected for retail matching. Once the site for retail matching is determined, Buxton will compare the site's trade area with the established locations of individual retailers. This analysis results in a preliminary list of matched retailers. Only retailers with locations in trade areas similar to the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission's trade area will be identified as potential matches. The preliminary Fist is then refined by Buxton on the basis of other retail location criteria to yield a list of up to twenty (20) specific, matched retailers for the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission. Buxton will provide the list of matched retailers to the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission for review and discussion. A marketing package will be prepared for each targeted retailer. The marketing packages are intended for presentation to retailers, as well as developers, potential franchisees, or other persons in a position to support the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission's retail goals. Each marketing package is unique to the specific targeted retailer, providing compelling and precise information that demonstrates the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission's qualifications as a location. Additionally, Buxton will contact each targeted retailer on behalf of the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission. Buxton will notify the retailer that the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission has been identified as a potentially viable location. Following is an outline of the scope of work for this project. Buxton is pleased to propose its support and looks forward to identifying retail opportunities for the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission. Btrxtoff 2 r4l Community/9 SCOPE OF SERVICES RETAIL POTENTIAL AND RETAIL SITE DETERMINATION 1. Establishment of retail trade areas for each site based upon drive times 2. Analysis of the suitability of each site and its trade area. Factors considered include but are not limited to: a. Psychographic analysis of households b. Demand for retail goods and services c. Existing retail and retail trends in the trade area and surrounding region d. Site setting, situation and configuration e. Growth plans and relevant developments f. Retail goals of the community 3. Buxton recommendation of the retail site and trade area with the most potential 4. Discussion and approval of a site with which to proceed to retail matching IDENTIFICATION OF RETAIL MATCHES FOR SELECTED SITE 1. Comparison of site trade area with existing retail location trade areas 2. Identification of preliminary target list of matching retailers 3. Additional analysis of preliminary targets 4. Determination of recommended list of matching retailers 5. Discussion and approval of final list of matching retailers for which marketing packages will be prepared t3 rM Community/9 SCHEDULE OF SERVICES This schedule is sequential and cumulative. It is based from the day following the project launch meeting. The project launch meeting is usually a conference call between the city and Buxton teams. The project launch meeting occurs after a contract and initial payment is received, and after Buxton receives requested and necessary information from the city (such as the three sites selected for study). This schedule is nominal, and does not account for periods during which the city reviews Buxton's recommendations. The schedule does not consider additional or custom research that may be required, or other unusual circumstances. 1. Delivery of large map with sites and trade area 5 business days 2. Retail site determination 5 business days 3. Recommended list of matching retailers 10 business days 4. Retail marketing packages 15 business days Buxton agrees to complete the CommunitylD analysis and deliver all final reports and retail marketing packages on or before April 27, 2005, provided the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission supplies Buxton with the data related to the scope of work as defined on page 8 of this agreement no later than February 23, 2005. Additionally, the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission agrees to work in a diligent and expedient manner with Buxton to complete the site selection phase and agree upon retailer matches. d- 5 rM unit l FEE FOR SERVICES The cost of Community /D is $70,000. The Baldwin Park Community Development Commission is eligible to receive a ten (10) percent discount if this agreement is executed prior to the expiration date of February 28, 2005; for a discounted price of $63,000 payable as follows: 1. $20,000 due upon execution of this agreement 2. $20,000 due on or before April 26, 2005 3. $23,000 due on or before July 15, 2005 The Baldwin Park Community Development Commission agrees to pay Buxton the pre- arranged, mutually agreed actual cost of travel associated with services rendered. This does not include travel associated with the presentation or negotiation of this agreement. It only includes travel costs incurred by Buxton at the request of the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission; such as for a community presentation or workshop following completion of the project. For services specifically requested by the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission and performed by Buxton outside the scope of this agreement, an hourly rate of $200 will apply. For additional copies of a retailer marketing package or reference binder, a fee of $200 will apply. xit * O—O g lhaKy This agreement is between the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission and Buxton (the "Parties ") for the performance of services described in this proposal. The Parties agree that an independent contractor /employer relationship is created as a result of this agreement. Buxton will not be considered an agent or employee of the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission for any purpose. The term of this agreement is one (1) year. This agreement may be terminated by either party at any time upon written notice of thirty (30) days. If this agreement is terminated, Buxton will be paid for services performed up to the date the written notice is received. Agreed and accepted this day of , 200_. Baldwin Park Community Development Commission 14403 East Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, CA 91706 (Signature) The Buxton Company 2651 S. Polaris Drive Fort Worth, TX 76137 (Signature) 7 THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission, a public body, corporate and politic, (hereinafter referred to as the "CDC") and, THE BUXTON COMPANY, a Texas corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Contractor"), collectively referred to herein as the Parties. 1:1*41 This Agreement is made and entered into with respect to the following facts: a. CDC has considered the Community ID Proposal, dated February 8, 2005 (the "Proposal"), from the Contractor for professional services including but not limited to, providing the services as described below in Section 1 of this Agreement. b. Contractor is qualified to provide such services and Contractor has agreed to perform such services, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. SECTION 1. SERVICES. The CDC's intent is to provide an in-depth retail marketing analysis for purposes of identifying business attraction and expansion opportunities within the City of Baldwin Park. Contractor will diligently perform the tasks in a good and workmanlike manner, which is more specially identified in the Scope of Services (Exhibit "A"), unless otherwise instructed in writing by the CDC. a. This Agreement shall commence on February 16, 2005, and shall expire upon satisfactory completion of the Scope of Services (as defined below), unless the Parties agree in writing to extend this Agreement; provided, that the parties anticipate the services being completed after February 16, 2006 (the "Expiration Date"), after commencement. b. Contractor shall devote such time to the performance of services pursuant to the Agreement as may be reasonably necessary for the satisfactory performance of Contractor's obligations pursuant to this Agreement. SECTION 3. PERFORMANCE. a. Contractor shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of its principal's abilities, experience and talents, perform all tasks described in this Agreement. I b. Contractor shall perform all tasks and responsibilities described in the Scope of Services (Exhibit "A"). Contractor agrees to complete the analysis and deliver all final reports and retail marketing packages on or before April 27, 2005, provided the CDC supplies Contractor with data related to the Scope of Services as defined in the Project Requirements (Exhibit "B") no later than February 23, 2005. CDC further complies to work diligently and expediently with Contractor on all appropriate processes during the scope of services in order for Contractor to meet the April 27, 2005 deadline. C. Contractor shall be knowledgeable of and subject to all CDC rules and regulations, standard operating procedures and the supervisory chain of command. SECTION 4. WORK PRODUCT. Contractor hereby agrees all work products produced pursuant to this Agreement shall be the sole property of CDC and ownership of said work products shall be retained by CDC. Contractor shall provide those products within ten (10) days after a written request from CDC. Contractor may retain copies of those work products. SECTION 5. EXTRA SERVICES. Contractor shall render no extra services beyond the Scope of Services described under this Agreement unless such extra services first shall have been duly authorized in writing by the Executive Director (the "ED") of CDC. Additional services shall be subject to terms agreed to in writing by the CDC and Contractor. SECTION 6. CDC SUPERVISION. The ED or his/her designee shall have the right of general supervision of all work performed by Contractor. No payment for services rendered under this Agreement shall be made without the prior approval of the ED or his/her designee. SECTION 7. PAYMENT. a. Fees for services shall be paid in accordance with the Proposal with a deposit in the amount of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) to be paid to the Contractor upon execution of this agreement, an additional twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) to be paid to Contractor upon completion of Section 3b due on or before April 26, 2005, and the final payment in the amount of twenty-three thousand dollars ($23,000.00) due on or before July 15, 2005. For satisfactory completion of the services described in Exhibit A, CDC agrees to pay Contractor a fee not to exceed sixty-three thousand dollars ($63,000.00). b. Contractor shall not be entitled to any additional benefits such as health insurance, uniform allowance, retirement benefits, sick leave or vacation. 2 C. Contractor shall provide an itemized bill to CDC before payment request for work completed for that period. The total amount of fees billed and paid shall not exceed the maximum set forth in 7.a., above, unless otherwise approved in writing by the Parties. Payment is due within thirty (30) days after approval of the bill by CDC. d. CDC shall not be required to make any payment until the insurance documents described in Section 12 have been submitted by Contractor and approved by CDC's general counsel. CDC shall have the right to terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, for any reason, with thirty-days' (30-days) written notice. Termination shall become effective thirty (30) days after delivery of written notice to Contractor. In the event CDC does not exercise the right to terminate as set forth herein, the Agreement shall automatically terminate on the Expiration Date. SECTION 9. NON-LIABILITY OF OFFICIALS AND EMPLOYEES OF THE CDC. No official or employee of CDC shall be personally liable to Contractor in the event of any default or breach by CDC or for any amount, which may become due to Contractor. SECTION 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. Contractor is and shall at all times remain, as to CDC, a wholly independent Contractor. Neither CDC nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Contractor except as expressly set forth in this Agreement. Contractor shall not at any time or in any fashion represent Contractor is in any manner an officer, employee or agent of CDC. No employee benefits shall be available to Contractor in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except as provided in this Agreement, CDC shall not pay salary, wages or other compensation to Contractor for performance hereunder for CDC. CDC shall not be liable for compensation to Contractor for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. SECTION 11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. Contractor shall at all times observe and comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, codes and regulations of the federal, state and local governments including, but not limited to, the Baldwin Park Municipal Code. CDC and its appointed or elected officers, employees or agents shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of Contractor to comply with this section. 3 Contractor agrees to and shall defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless CDC, the City of Baldwin Park and each of their elected and appointed boards, officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers (the "Indemnified Parties") from and against any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, defense costs, civil penalties, expenses, causes of action, judgments at law or in equity or liability of any kind or nature ("Claims") which the Indemnified Parties may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injuries or deaths of persons or damage to property arising out of Contractor's performance related to this Agreement. This section does not apply to liability arising out of the sole negligence of any of the Indemnified Parties. A copy of a certificate of insurance insuring Contractor and an endorsement naming the Indemnified Parties as additional insureds shall be provided for reasonable approval by CDC's general counsel. SECTION 13. INSURANCE. a. Contractor shall obtain and maintain at its expense, during the term of this Agreement, all necessary insurance for its employees engaged in the performance of this Agreement, including, but not limited to worker's compensation insurance. b. Contractor shall obtain and maintain at its expense, during the term of this Agreement, comprehensive general liability insurance with coverage of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) combined single limit per occurrence (and not "claims made") for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. Contractor shall cause City, CDC, its officers, employees, and agents, to be named as an additional insured on said policy and shall obtain a waiver of the insurer's right of subrogation against City and CDC. C. Contractor shall obtain and maintain professional liability (errors and omissions) insurance in an amount of not less $1,000,000.00. d. Contractor shall provide City with written proof of the existence of such insurance and the commitment of the insurance carrier (either by policy endorsement or similar agreement) to notify City in writing 30 days before any reduction in coverage or the cancellation of such insurance. • This Agreement contains the entire understanding between CDC and Contractor related to the Scope of Services discussed herein and any prior agreements, promises, negotiations or representations not expressly set forth herein regarding that work are of no force or effect. Subsequent modifications to this Agreement shall be effective only if in writing and signed by each party. If any term, condition or covenant of this Agreement is held by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or 4 unenforceable, then the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall be valid and binding. Waiver by any party hereto of any term, condition or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute the waiver of any other term, condition or covenant hereof. SECTION 16. BINDING EFFECT. This Agreement shall be binding upon and,shall inure to the benefit of the successors of each of the Parties hereto. SECTION 17. GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement shall be interpreted and construed according to the laws of the State of California and venue shall be in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. SECTION 18. ATTORNEY'S FEES. If litigation is reasonably required to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, then the prevailing party in such Litigation shall be entitled to an award of reasonable attorney's fees in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled. SECTION 19. NOTICE. All notices shall be personally delivered or mailed to the addresses listed below: "CONTRACTOR" The Buxton Company 2651 S. Polaris Drive Fort Worth, TX 76137 Attn: Patricia Bell, Territory Business Manager "CDC" Baldwin Park Community Development Commission` Attn: Executive Director 14403 East Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, CA 91706 SECTION 20. ASSIGNMENT. Neither party may assign any right or obligation under this Agreement without the express written approval of the other party; provided that CDC may assign its rights and obligations to the City of Baldwin Park. 5 IN W1TNESSETH WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be executed an the date identified below. TDC" BALDWIN ' PARK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Dated. Sid Mousavi Interim Executive Director APPROVED AS TO n-Rhii. h Agency Counsel "Co ra r" TH U ON Y Dated: David Glover — Chief Financial Officer [dated; Its 6 Exhibit "A Scope of Services Contractor shall provide an in- depth retail marketing analysis for purposes of identifying business attraction and expansion opportunities within the City of Baldwin Park. The Contractor will be responsible for performing all required services, generating all documents and participation in all relevant processes including but not limited to: • the identification of the potential retail zones • analysis of the viability for retail development in each identified zone and its trade area. Factors considered include but are not limited to: • analysis of psychographics and demographics of households • identification of product demand and drive time trade area • analysis of existing retail and retail trends • growth plans and relevant developments ■ recommendation of the retail site and trade area with the most potential ■ discussion and approval of a site with which to proceed for retail matching ■ comparison and analysis of existing similar local and regional trade areas ■ identification of preliminary target list of matching retailers and determination of recommended list research reports (household profiles, dominant household segments) ■ discussion and approval of final list of matching retailers ■ publishing of a marketing binder that can be used to market to potential tenants ■ delivery of retailer specific marketing packages that can be used to market the community to the prospective retail tenant or developer ■ presentations, as requested, before the City Council, 'CDC, Planning Commission and community groups The scope of work' shall be prepared and processed pursuant to the requirements of the State of California Community Redevelopment Health and Safety Code, Section 33000 et. seq. Exhibit «B,, Project Requirements In order to effectively engage and complete the scope of work, the following is requested by The Buxton Company ( "The Contractor ") Project Liaison ■ The City of Baldwin Park ( "The City ") will designate a project manager who will serve as Contractor's primary contact during the project. Information and Reports • Logo (electronic version) • Addresses and description information for up to three (3) sites that will be evaluated • Current traffic count data • Digital street data • List of major, national or regional retailers present in the community • List of planned retail, either proposed or in development, in the community • List of planned residential developments • Housing start information • Zoning and comprehensive plan documents • General community marketing data and reports Buxton Community ID Staff Report February 16, 2005 Page 5 of 3 C:\ WINDOWS \Desktop\Communityl DProposalMoc 3 Buxton Community ID Staff Report February 16, 2005 Pacie 6 of 3 Attachment "C" Client References C:\ WINDOWS\ Desktop \CommunitylDProposal3.doc Btrawy +o rng c +ors ComlCttlunitylD References 2004 City ofDenton,, TX City of iVl[il Creek, WA Linda Ratliff Robert Stowe Director of Economic Development City Manager 100 West Oak, Suite 101 15728 Mill Creek Boulevard Denton, TX 76201 Mill Creek, WA 98012 (940) 349 -8305 (425) 921 -5724 ibratliff @cityofdenton.cotn bob@cityofmillcreek.com City of Dahcaneille, 'Irk City of New Braunfels Earle Jones Mike Meek' Director of Economic Development President 203 E. Wheatland Road Greater New Braunfels Chamber of Commerce Duncanville, TX 75138 390 South Seguin (972) 780 -5093 New Braunfels, TX 78131 elones @ci:duncanville.tx.us (830) 625 -0441 City of Cary, N )< meeK Ua)newbrauntepschamber.corta Ben CIement City of PammgR pt, CA' Director of Economic Development Patrick West, City Manager 504 'Broadway, Suite 625 Joe Perez, Community Development Director Gary, rN 46402 16400 Colorado Avenue (219) 881 -5235 Paramount, CA 90723 ben—clement-99@yahoo.com (562)220 -2225 Cite of Perris, CA City of Keller, TX Michael McDermott Woody Mitchell Director, Real Estate and Development Director of Economic Development 101 North "D" Street 1 100 Bear Creek Parkway Perris, CA 92570 A1Gt2Gt, A,(1, J(PLL`t (9U9) 943 -6100 ext 245 (817) 743 -4020 mmcdermott@pe[ris- ca.org wmitchell@cityofkeller.com City of 1F8i+rhland, 'WA City of Lancaster, CA Rita Mazur Mark Bozigian (pronounced $o 'zeegin) Council Member Assistant to the City Manager 505 Swift Boulevard 44933 Fem Avenue Richland, WA 99352 Lancaster, CA 93534 (509) 942 -7390 (661) 723 -6030 rmazur @ci.richland.wa.us mbozigian@cityoflancasterca.org . 11' laoreline, WA C[IY oJan City o cKirtne T K. Knudson John Kessel Economic Development City Manager's Office Director of Development Services 17544 Midvale Avenue North 222 North Tennessee Shoreline, WA 98133' McKinney, TX 75070 (206) 546 -0959 (972) 547 -7402 jknudson @ci.shoreline.wa.us jkessel@mckinneytexas.org Btr,,Ltoiy lbng t C:ommunitylD References 2004 City Of Watertown, SD Richard Benda President 1200 Mickelson Drive Watertown, SD 57201 (888) 898 -6767 rbenda @focuswatertown.com ,A;dditional reference who tools another city mapaer �ositiaia at a different city Qy of Na Cqgyddocbes. TX Jim Jeffers City Manager 202 East PiIaS' Nacogdoches, TX 75963 (936) 559 -2501 jjeffCrs@ci.nacogdoches.tx.us Iiu�fc1n _ Buxton Community ID Staff Report February 16, 2005 Page 7 of 3 Community ID Contacted Clients City Direct Contact Independent Contact Landscater, CA Mark Bozigian, Robert S. LaSala, Assistant to the City Manager City Manager Paramount, CA Patrick West, Joe Perez, City Manager Community Dev. Director Perris, CA Michael McDermott, Real Estate and Dev. Director Gardena, CA Mitch Lansdell, Kathy Ikari, City Manager Community Dev. Director Mill Creek, WA Robert Stowe, Redevelopment Rep. City Manager McKinney, TX John Kessel, Director of Dev. Services Duncancille, TX Earle Jones Kent Cagle, Director of Econ. Dev. City Manager Keller, TX Woody Mitchell, Dir. of Economic Dev. Buxton Community ID Staff Report February 16, 2005 Page 8 of 3 Document1 Table of Contents Listof Tables ...................................................... - ii Chapter I Introduction ....................................... I ........ 1 1.1 Background ......................................... 1 1.2 Approach to the Retail Analysis ........................... I 1.3 Overview ............................................ 2 Chapter 2 Retail Supply-Demand Analysis .............................. 3 2.1, Approach to the Retail Supply-Demand Analysis ............. 3 2.1 Baldwin Park Household Retail Conditions ................. 3 2.2 Regional Retail Analysis ................................ 6 Chapter 3 Retail Opportunities for Downtown Baldwin Park ............... 9 3.1 Focused Retail Analysis ................................ 9 3.2 Preliminary Target Retail Mix ........................... 12 3.3 Store Types, Site Requirements and 'Chain Stores .......... 12 Chapter 4 Implementation Issues .................................... 19 4.1 Completion of Target Retail Mix ......................... 19 4.2 Further Steps ................................... .... 19 List of Tables Table 2 -1 City of Baldwin Park and Regional Retail Trade Area Estimated Households by Income ..... . ............ 4 2-2 2000 Retail Demand, Supply and Sales Leakage .................. 5 2 -3 2000 Retain Composition of Baldwin Park Trade Area .............. 7 3 -:1 Comparative Composition of Specialty Retailing ................. 10 3 -2 Comparative Composition of Home Furnishings and Appliance Retailing ................... 11 3 -3 Comparative Composition of General Merchandise Retailing ........ 13 3-4 Comparative Composition of Apparel Retailing ................... 14 3-5 Estimated Sales Leakage and Supportable Square Feet ........... 15 3 -6 Store Sizes in Gross Leasable Area .............. .... ...... 16 3 -7 Chain'Stores .... ................. .......... 18 tl Chapter 1 Introduction report 1.1 Background This provides a r- analysis - City of Baldwin Park and its downtown. downtown - includes the of Baldwin • _ of businesses and shops, and housing. The purpose of the analysis is to define appropriate retail target `: • • for The overall leakaae and capture analysis is supplemented with a focused retail analysis, which examines more detailed store types. detailed composition • 1 Baldwin Park sales is compared to the composition of sales statewide to determine opportunities within each category. For example, for the major retail category of household furnishings, the analysis will show opportunities for such detailed store types as miscellaneous home furnishings, household appliances and home electronics. Based on the focused retail analysis, a target retail mix will be identified for the downtown area of Baldwin Park. This target retail mix is then translated into space requirements for stores of different types. Finally, some representative chain stores are identified, including store sizes and propensities to locate in downtown and streetfront sites. 1.3 Overview Chapter 2 presents the overall leakage and capture analysis for Baldwin Park and the regional trade area. In Chapter 3, the focused retail analysis and the target retail mix are presented. Chapter 4 discusses implementation issues: 2 Chapter 2 Retail Supply - Demand Analysis 2.1 Approach to the Retail Supply- Demand Analysis The.retail supply - demand analysis includes a number of steps. • First, retail demand of households in Baldwin Park is estimated. These estimates are based on the number of households by income levels, and by retail spending patterns for each income category. Second, the actual retail sales in Baldwin Park are compiled based on taxable sales data from the California State Board of Equalization. • Third, the retail capture and leakage for each retail category are estimated by comparing demand and actual retail sales in Baldwin Park. The retail` supply- demand analysis represents the starting point in identifying retail opportunities for the City of Baldwin Park. Next, a focused retail analysis identifies more detailed retail types. These latter analyses, beyond the overall retail supply- demand analysis, are presented in Chapter 3. 2.2 Baldwin Park Household Retail Conditions The retail demand within Baldwin Park is estimated on the basis of the number of households, the household incomes and the composition of retail expenditures by households of differing income levels. Households by income levels for the year 2000 are presented in Table 2 -1. Baldwin Park comprises 16,953 households out of a trade area total of 113,382 households, or approximately 15 %. The median household income in Baldwin Park of $41,629 is slightly below the regional median of $43,567. Table 2-2 presents the retail /supply demand analysis for the City of Baldwin Park. The analysis covers the following retail categories: Apparel. This category includes all types of apparel stores, including women's ready -to- wear, women's clothing and accessories, men's apparel, family apparel and shoe stores. General merchandise. This category comprises department stores, including full -line stores, discount stores and warehouse stores. n Food stores. This includes supermarkets and specialty foods, such as meat markets, bakeries and health foods. Eating and drinking places. This category include all types of restaurants, including dinner restaurants, family restaurants and fast food. 3 Number of Households by Income Range Total Less than $30,000 $30,000 to $49999 $50,000 to $69,999 $70,000 and More Median Household Income Households by Income Baldwin Park 16,953 5,709 4,510 2,724 4,011 $41,629 West Covina 31,409 7,666 6,886 5,630 11,228 53,002 Covina 15,953 4,708 3,507 2,648 5,092 48,474 El Monte 27,094 _12,241 6,900 3,218 4,736 32,439 City of Industry 140 28 45 38 29 49,423 La Puente 9,444 3,393 2,168 1,623 2,260 41,222 Azusa 12.E 4.527 3JA.Q 2.003 2.719 39,191 Total 113,382 38,271 27,155 17,884 30,073 $43,567 Percent of Total Baldwin Park 100.0% 33.7% 26.6% 16.1 % 23.7% West Covina 100.0% 24.4% 21.9% 17.9% 35.7% Covina 100.0 %" 29.5% 22.0% 16.6% 31.9% El Monte 100.0% 45.2 %0 25.5% 11.9% 17.5% City of Industry 100.0% 20.0% 32.1% 27.3% 20.5% La Puente 100.0% 35.9% 23.0% 17.2% 23.9 %` Azusa 100.0% is 25.3% 16.2°!0 21.9% Total 100.0% 33.8% 23.9% 15.8% 26.5% Source: Land Use Economics 2000 Census Demographic Profiles NEWLEAK1.WK4 4 TABLE 2 -2 City of Baldwin Park 2000 Retail Demand, Supply and Sales Leakage (Thousands of Dollars) Retail Sates Demand- Apparel Leakage -- Ratio of Citywide Retail Supply Sales to Purchasing Supply— Minus Purchasing Power Citiwide Sales Demand Power 1 2 3 4 Retail Categories Apparel $13,900 $6,100 ($7,800) 43.9% General merchandise 50,500 37,200 (13,300) 73.7% Food stores 20,200 27,000 6,800 133.7% Eating and drinking 39,000 37,900 (1,100) 97.2% - Household furniture and appliances 14,400 2,800 (11,600) 19.4% Building materials/farm implements 26,800 48,100 21,300 179.5% Auto dealers and auto supplies 60,700 12,700 (48,000) 20.9% Service stations 27,200 25,500 (1,700) 93.8% Specialty retail stores 58.QQQ 64.600 fi&M 111.4% Total $310,700 $261,900 ($48,800) 84.3% Source: Land Use Economics U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Expenditure Survey U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 Census Demographic Profiles California State Board of Equalization, Taxable Sales in California, During 2000 NEWLEAK1.WK4 5 - I - 57- 1 6=1110 11 11 A V i "14 Q,uch as cutlery, china, carp6iing and draperies are included. Building materials. This category include building materials and hardware. Auto dealers and auto supplies include new and used car auto dealerships and auto parts and supply stores. 2.3 Regional Retail Analysis - Aj TABLE 2-3 City of Baldwin Park 2000 Retail Composition of Baldwin Park Trade Area On Thousands of Dollars) Sales in Retail Stores Apparel $6,100 $103,200 $6,400 $13,800 $33,400 $5,100 $1,800 $169,800 General merchandise 37,200 234,300 87,300 76,900 257,800 16,100 107,400 817,000 Food stores 27,000 43,600 26,600 35,200 11,800 24,300 18,500 187,000 Eating and drinking places 37,900 85,700 69,700 54,000 86,700 27,700 28,600 390,300 Household furniture and appliances 2,800 43,000 12,500 27,600 109,900 5,400, 2,400 203,600 Building materialsffarm implements 48,100 13,500 50,500 65,600 233,600 0 9,400 420,700 Auto dealers and auto supplies 12,700 291,300 111,000 813,500 ' 377,300 59,300 21,700 1,686,800 Service stations 25,500 43,900 47,500 57,800 20,500 11,700 24,700 231,600 Specialty retail stores 64,600 135.440 106 400 55 -094 ' 1; 2L= 22" 506,300 Total- $261,900- $993,500 $517,900 $1,199,400 $1,326,600 $176,900 $236,900 $4,713,100 Percentage of Total Sales within Cities Apparel 2.3% 10.4% 1.2% 1.2% 2.5% 2.9% 0.8% 3.6% General merchandise 14.2% 23.6% 16.9% 6.4% 19.4% 9.1% 45.3% 17.3% Food stores %3% 4.4% 5.1% 2.9% 0.9% 13.7% 7.8% 4.0% Eating and drinking places 14.5% 8.6% 13.5 %° 4.5% 6.5% 15.7% 12.1% 8.3 % Household furniture and appliances 1.1% 4.3% 2.4% 2.3% 8.3% 3.1% 1.0% 4.3% Building materialstfarm implements 18.4% 1.4% 9.8% 5.5% 17.6% 0.0% 4.0% 8.9% Auto dealers and auto supplies 4.8% 29.3% 21.4% 67.8% 28.4% 33.5 %_ 9.20/6 35.8% Service stations 9.7% 4.4% 9.2 % 4.8% 1.5% 6.6% 10.4% 4.9% Specialty retail stores 24.7% 130% 24.5% AS& 14.7% 15-4% 2.5% � °� Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0 %° 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Cities' Sales Share of Regional Total 3.6% 60.8% 3.8 %; 8.1 % 193%0 3.0% 1.1% 100.0% Apparel General merchandise 4.6% 28.7% 10.7 % 9.4 %° 31.6% 2.0% 13.1% 100.0% Food stores 14:4% 23.3% 14.2% 18.8% 6.3 %° 13.0% 9.9% 100.0% Eating and drinking places 9.7% 22.0% 17.9% 13.8% 22.2% 7.1% 7.3% 100.0% Household furniture and appliances 1.4% 21.1% 6.1% 13.6% 54.0 %° 2.7% 1.2% 100.0% Building materialstfarm implements 11.4% 3.2 %° 12.0 %° 15.6% 55.5% 0.0% 2.2% 100.0% Auto dealers and auto supplies 0.8% 17.3% 6.6% 48.2% 22A% 3.5 % 1.3% 100.0% Service stations 11.0% 19.0% 20.5 % 25.00/6 8.9% 5.1% 10.7% 100.0% Specialty retail stores 10.7% 22.3% 17.5% 9.1% 32.3% 4.5 %' 3.7 %° 100.0% Total 5.6 %° 21.1% 11.0% 25.4% 28.1% 3.8% 5.0% 100.0% Source: Land Use Economics Cafdomia State Board of Equ&zrkva, TanaVe SaI s i 3 i a4,,bmi ., wring 2000 NEWLEAKI.WK4 % With regard to Baldwin Park, the City has captured only about 5.6 %Q of the regional sales, while it represents approximately 15% of the regional purchasing power in all categories. Notably, the City only captures 3.6% of the apparel sales and 1.4% of the household furnishings and appliance sales: The above analysis shows that Baldwin Park experiences substantial retail leakage, providing opportunities for new retail development in the City and the Downtown. The following chapter focuses on the specific categories of retail leakage, with more detailed identification of retail opportunities. 8 Chapter 3 Retail Opportunities for Downtown Baldwin Park 3.1 Focused Retail Analysis This chapter uses the leakage analysis of Chapter 2 as a guide to evaluation of retail opportunities for the Downtown Baldwin Park. When viewing target retail opportunities, several considerations must be kept in mind. • First, what are the subcategories of retail which constitute particular voids in the Baldwin Park retail base? • Second, are the retail types suitable for the Baldwin Park downtown area, in terms of site sizes, store sizes and parking? • Third, are the retail types suitable in terms of City goals and preferences for the area? • Finally, do competing stores in other cities constitute significant competition which may be difficult for downtown area to overcome? Based on the above analysis, target sectors are discussed in the sectors of specialty retailing, home furnishings and appliances, general merchandise and apparel. The target sectors are defined by comparisons between the retail mix of California compared to Baldwin Park. When the proportions of retail sales for subcategories are below the statewide average, opportunities may exist for new development in Baldwin Park and the Downtown Baldwin Park. Specialty retailing. While the City is well- served by specialty retail establishments, including some overall sales capture from outside, some opportunities for new stores may exist. Table 3 -1 presents the composition of specialty retailing in California and Baldwin Park, to help identify subcategories of opportunity. As shown in Table 3 -1, the City shows higher than average shares for the subcategories of used merchandise, stationery stores, jewelry stores, florists, tobacco stores and stands and optical goods. Lower than average shares, indicating opportunities for new retail development, are shown for sporting goods and bicycle shops, gift, novelty and souvenir shops, sewing, needlework and piece goods. Home furnishings and appliances. The City is capturing only about 19% of resident demand for home furnishings and appliances. Table 3 -2 shows the comparative composition of subcategories between California and Baldwin Park. The City's composition is less than that of the State for the categories of furniture stores, floor coverings, television and electronics and computer and software stores. The City's capture exceeds that of the State in the categories of drapery and upholstery, miscellaneous home furnishings and record and prerecorded tape stores. 9 TABLE -1 Comparative Composition of Specialty Retailing State of California and City of Baldwin [park C! of State ®f- Gal ornla l Baldwin Park cialty Retail SubCat oriel Used merchandise stores 11.3% 13.6% Sporting goods and bicycle shops 17.4% 10.6% Stationery stores 2.8% 4.5% Jewelry stores 10.6 % 13.6% Gift,, novelty, and souvenir shops 16.5% 15.2% Sewing, needlework, and piece goods 4.8% 0.0% Florists 8.3% 9.1% Tobacco stores and stands 0.9% 9.1% Optical goods stores 4.8% 10.6% Miscellaneous retail stores, n.e.c. YQ ya Total 100.0% 100.0% Source: Land Use Economics County Business Patterns ZIP Code Business Patterns BAL.WK4 10 TABLE 3 -2 Comparative Composition of Home Furnishings and Appliance Retailing State of California and City of Baldwin Park ��= State of California Home Furnishings and Appliano 5 eaories_ Fumiture stores 23.90® 13.3% Floor covering stores 7.9% 6.7 %° Drapery and upholstery stores 1.0% 15.6% Misc. homefumishings stores 18.2% 31.1% Radio, N, and electronic stores 23.3% 6.7% Computer and software stores 14.7 %° 13.3% Record and prerecorded tape stores 119% 13.3-°lsl4 Total 100.0% 100.0% Source: Land Use Economics County Business Patterns ZIP Code Business Patterns General Merchandise. As shown in Table 3-3, the City of Baldwin Park has a share of department stores far below the statewide average-1.6% vs. 61.1%. The City's Share of miscellaneous general merchandise stores is also well above the state-57.4% vs. 25.6%. While it may b I e difficult to accommodate a major department store downtown, there may be opportunities for smaller general merchandise stores. Apparel. As presented in Table 3-4, the City shows significant leakage in apparel, with local stores satisfying only 6.0% of demand. The best opportunities for apparel stores are estimated in family clothing stores. C. Preliminary Target Retail Mix Based on the above focused analysis, a target retail mix for the Downtown Baldwin Park is defined. This retail mix is based • sales leakage estimates, a target capture rate for the Downtown Baldwin Park, and representative sales generation factors, Table 3-5 presents th ' e preliminary target retail mix for the Downtown Baldwin Park. This retail mix includes four major categories: 3.3 Store Types, Site Requirements and Chain Stores Site requirements. Site requirements are presented in Table 3-6. These estimates are derived from the Urban Land Institute, Dollars and Cents • Shopping Centers 2000. Square feet per store are shown for the median store size. 12 TABLE 3 -3 Comparative Composition of General Merchandise Retailing State of California and City of Baldwin Park S#a #e of City of Califomia Baldwin Park [;pnarai Merr°haneiice Rgtall Subcategories Department stores 61.0% 1.6% Variety stores 1.5% 18.6% Miscellaneous general merchandise stor 25.6 % 57.4% Drug stores 11.9% 22.3%s Total 100.0% 100.0% Source: Land Use Economics County Business Pattems ZIP Code Business Pattems BRL.WK4 13 TABLE 3-4 Comparative Composition of Apparel Retailing State of California and City of Baldwin Park State of City of Calefomia I Baldwin Park rawa I Rail Subc-ateaories Men's and boys' clothing stores 10.1% -- 13.3% Women's clothing stores 28.7% 35.6% Family clothing stores - 40.4% 6.7 °l® Shoe stores 16.7% 31.1% Misc. apparel and accessory stores ° 13.31s Total 100.0% 100.0% Source: Land Use Economics County Business Pattems ZIP Code Business Pattems BAL.WK4 14 Specialty retailing Downtown $8,100 $350 Citywide Area Sates 3,480 Sates Target @ 30% per Square Leaks a of city S . Foot Feet Specialty retailing n/a $8,100 $350 23,100 Home furnishings and appliances $11,600 3,480 260 13,400 General merchandise 13,300 3,990 250 16,000 Apparel LM IMQ M 8,100 $32,700 $17,910 $288 60,600 Source: Land.Use Economics NEWLEAK1.WK4 15 Table 3-6 Store Sizes in Gross Leaseable Area Median Square Feet per Store Specialty retail stores - Cameras 1,300 Arts and crafts 1,800 Game store 1,200 Sporting goods 5,000 Household furniture and appliances Furniture 5,300 China and glassware 3,100 Home accessories 3,700 Cutlery stores 700 . Kitchen stores 3,300 Gourmet cookware 3,000 Apparel - Women's specialty 3,600 - Women's ready to wear 4,300 Children's wear 2,600 Men's wear 3,100 Family wear 4,000 Source: Land Use Economics Urban Land Institute, Dollars and Cents of Shopping Centers 2000 TABL 36.WK4 16 m Table 3 -7 Chain Stores Downtownistreefront Typical Store Size among Square Feet Preferred Locations 1N Specialty retail stores Cloth World 13,500 N Michaels Arts & Crafts 18,000 N Coach House Gifts 3,000 N Hallmark Cards 3,000 Y Ritz Cameras 2,000 N Home furnishings and appliances ColorTyme 4,000 N Mattress Discounters 4,000 N Apparel Fashion Bug 12,000 Y Ross Dress for Less 28,000 Y One Price Clothing Stores 3,500 N Dress Barn 6,000 Y Clothestime 4,500 Y Susies Deals 2,400 Y Restaurants and Fast Food ICBY (1 Can't Believe Its Yogurt) 1,000 Y Cocos 5,000 N Subway Sandwiches 1,000 Y Hometown Buffet 10,000 N Koo Koo Roo 3,500 Y Panda Express 1,600 Y Starbuck's Coffee 1,500 Y Soup Plantation 7,000 Y Togo's Eatery 1,600 N Source: Crittenden Directory of Retail Space Users TABL 36.WK4 18 Chapter 4 Implementation Issues 4.1 Completion of Target Retail Mix and evaluation of competitive stores. Consensus on • retail r et retail mix involves the retail •! of apparel, specialty retailing and home furnishings and appliances. These categories should be correlated with exyressed goals of the CiN, and committees which have ?,�qated in planning for the Downtown Possible omissions • • be identified, and necessary revisions ! the target retail prepared. Consistency of target retail mix with physical opportunities in the Downtown. The • _ sizes and total square footages identified in Chapter • • be compared with potential new retail space opportunities in the Downtown. 4.2 Further Steps After confirmation and refinement of the target retail mix, the City may take further steps toward attraction of retail - • will include preparation of • analysis for target retailers, and identification of additional financial support which may be required to attract retailers. As the physical planning and revisions to the Downtown take place, the City may attract • • • - • . • • • ! . • ! • - brokers, Manuel Lozano Chair Ricardo Pacheco - Vice Chair Marlen Garcia - Member David J. Olivas - Member Bill Van Cleave - Member PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES AND PAGERS WHILE MEETING IS IN PROCESS POR FAVOR DE APAGAR SUS TELEFONOS CELULARES Y BEEPERS DURANTE LA JUNTA PUBLIC COMMENTS The public is encouraged to address the City Council or any of its Agencies listed on this agenda on any matter posted on the agenda or on any other matter within its jurisdiction. If you wish to address the City Council or any of its Agencies, you may do so during the PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS period noted on the agenda. Each person is allowed five (5) minutes speaking time. A Spanish speaking interpreter is available for your convenience. COMENTARIOS DEL PUBLICO Se invita al p6blico a dirigirse al Concilio o cualquiera otra de sus Agencias nombradas en esta agenda, para hablar sobre cualquier asunto publicado en la agenda o cuaIquier terra que est6 bajo su jurisdicci6n. Si usted desea la oportunidad de dirigirse al Concilio o a1guna de sus Agencias, podri hacerlo durante e/ periodo de Comentarios del P(iblico (Public Communications) anunciado en /a agenda. A cada persona se le permite hablar por cinco (5) minutos. Hay un int6rprete para su conveniencia. FINANCE AUTHORITY REGULAR MEETING — 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER IP►1TL•Ti7e�L�71 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: Members: Marlen Garcia, David J. Olivas, Bill Van Cleave, Vice -Chair Ricardo Pacheco and Chair Manuel Lozano ANNOUNCEMENTS c Five (5) minute speaking time limit Cinco (5) minutos sera el limite para hablar THIS IS THE TIME SET ASIDE TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION No action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances exist. The legislative body or its staff may: 1) Briefly respond to statements made or questions asked by persons; or 2) Direct staff to investigate and /or schedule matters for consideration at a future meeting. [Government Code §54954.2] ESTE ES EL PERIODO DESIGNADO PARA DIRIGIRSE AL COMIS16N No se podra tomar action en algun asunto a menos que sea incluido en la agenda, o a menos que exista alguna emergency o circunstancia especial. El cuerpo legislativo y su personal podran: 1) Responder brevemente a declaraciones o preguntas hechas por personas; o 2) Dirigir personal a investigar y/o fijar asuntos para tomar en consideration en juntas proximas. [Codigo de Gobierno §54954.2] CONSENT CALENDAR All items listed are considered to be routine business by the Commission and will be approved with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests, in which case, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. 1. MINUTES Staff recommends Authority approve minutes of January 19, 2005 (Regular). Finance Authority Agenda — February 16, 2005 2 Rosefnar'TM Ra rez, CIVIC Chief beputy ity Clerk PLEASE NOTE: Copies of staff reports and supporting documentation pertaining to each item on this agenda are available for public viewing and inspection at City Hall, 2"a Floor Lobby Area or at the Los Angeles County Public Library in the City of Baldwin Park. For further information regarding agenda items, please contact the office of the City Clerk at 626.960.4011, ext. 108 or 466 or via e -mail at rramirezQbaidwinpark.com or Inieto@baldwinpark.com In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the Public Works Department or Risk Management at 626:960.4011. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable staff to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. (28 CFR 34.102.104 ADA TITLE II) Finance Authority Agenda — February 16, 2005 3 CITY OF BALDWIN PARK FINANCE AUTHORITY FITRIF144.9 FINANCING AUTHORIP W AGENDA Manuel Lozano, Chair FEB 1 6 2005 Ricardo Pacheco, Vice-Chair Marlen Garcia, Member David J. Olivas, Member Bill Van Cleave, Member Maria Contreras, City Treasurer Kathryn Tizcareno, City Clerk .. _M NO, The FINANCE AUTHORITY of the City of Baldwin Park met in REGULAR SESSION at the above time and place. Tell= Present: Member Marlen Garcia, David J. Olivas, Bill Van Cleave, Vice-Chair Ricardo Pacheco and Chair Manuel Lozano Also Present: Sid Mousavi, Interim Executive Director; Stephanie Scher, Commission Attorney; Mark Kling, Chief of Police; Hennie Apodaca, Interim Finance Director; Shafique Naiyer, Public Works Director; Jack Wong, Interim Community Development & Housing Director; Manny Carrillo, Recreation and Community Services Director and Rosemary M. Ramirez, Chief Deputy City Clerk CONSENT CALENDAR APPROVED A motion was made to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1 as presented, and as follows: MOTION: Chair Lozano SECOND: Member Garcia Carried 1. MINUTES The minutes of December 15, 2004 (Regular) were approved as presented. There being no other matters for discussion, the meeting was adjourned at 9:25 p.m. Approved as presented by the Commission at their meeting held February 16, 2005. Rosemary M. Ramirez, CMC Chief Deputy City Clerk PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES AND PAGERS WHILE MEETING IS IN PROCESS POR FAVOR DE APAGAR SUS TELEFONOS CELULARES Y BEEPERS DURANTE LA JUNTA PUBLIC COMMENTS The public is encouraged to address the City Council or any of its Agencies listed on this agenda on any matter posted on the agenda or on any other matter within its jurisdiction. If you wish to address the City Council or any of its Agencies, you may do so during the PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS period noted on the agenda. Each person is allowed five (5) minutes speaking time. A Spanish speaking interpreter is available for your convenience. COMENTARIOS DEL PUBLICO Se invita al p6blico a dirigirse al Concitio o cualquiera otra de sus Agencias nombradas en esta agenda, para hablar sobre cualquier asunto publicado en la agenda o cualquier terra que est6 bajo su jurisdicci6n. Si usted desea la oportunidad de dirigirse al Concilio o a1guna de sus Agencias, podri hacerlo durante el periodo de Comentarios del POblico (Public Communications) anunciado en la agenda. A cada persona se le permite hablar por cinco (5) minutos. Hay un int6rprete para su conveniencia. HOUSING AUTHORITY REGULAR MEETING — 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION W44 -Bm4ra7 ROLL CALL Members: Marlen Garcia, David J. Olivas, Bill Van Cleave, Vice- Chair Ricardo Pacheco and Chair Manuel Lozano ANNOUNCEMENTS PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Five (5) minute speaking time limit Cinco (5) minutos sera el limite Para hablar THIS IS THE TIME SET ASIDE TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION No action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances exist. The legislative body or its staff may: 1) Briefly respond to statements made or questions asked by persons; or 2) Direct staff to investigate and /or schedule matters for consideration at a future meeting. [Government Code §54954.2] ESTE ES EL PERIODO DESIGNADO PARA DIRIGIRSE AL COMIS16N No se podra tomar accion _en algun asunto a menos que sea incluido en la agenda, o a menos que exista alguna emergencia o circunstancia especial. El cuerpo legislativo y su personal podran: 1) Responder brevemente a declaraciones o preguntas hechas por personas; o 2) Dirigir personal a investigar y/o fyar asuntos Para tomar en consideracion en juntas proximas. [Codigo de Gobiemo §54954.2] CONSENT CALENDAR All items listed are considered to be routine business by the Commission and will be approved with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests, in which case, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. 00- ._ to] - e CLOSED SESSION Housing Authority Agenda — February 16, 2004 0 Rosen) a!ry1M,—,Raf,3i rez, CMC Chief Deput y Clerk PLEASE NOTE: Copies of staff reports and supporting documentation pertaining to each item on this agenda are available for public viewing and inspection at City Hall, 2"d Floor Lobby Area or at the Los Angeles County Public Library in the City of Baldwin Park. For further information regarding agenda items, please contact the office of the City Clerk at 626.960.4011, ext. 108 or via e-mail at rramirez@baldwingark.com In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the Public Works Department or Risk Management at 626.960.4011. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable staff to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. (28 CFR 34.102.104 ADA TITLE //) Housing Authority Agenda — February 16, 2004 3 CITY OF BALD IN PARK MINUTES WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 19 2004 HOUSING AUTHORITY Council Chambers 11403 E. Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park jfD JANVaQyM1 HOUSING AUTHORITY Manuel Lozano, Chair AGENDA Ricardo Pacheco, Vice -Chair Marlen Garcia, Member David J. Olivas, Member Bill Van Cleav b,,r �e �3 Maria Contreras, City Treasurer Kathryn Tizcareno, City Clerk ! ® 200 5 ITEM NO. The HOUSING AUTHORITY of the City of Baldwin Park met in REGULAR SESSION at the above time and place. ROLL CALL Present: Member Marlen Garcia, David J. Olivas, Bill Van Cleave, Vice -Chair Ricardo Pacheco and Chair Manuel Lozano Also Present: Sid Mousavi, Interim Executive Director; Stephanie Scher, Commission Attorney; Mark Kling, Chief of Police; Hennie Apodaca, Interim Finance Director; Shafique Naiyer, Public Works Director; Jack Wong, Interim Community Development & Housing Director; Manny Carrillo, Recreation and Community Services Director; and Rosemary M. Ramirez, Chief Deputy City Clerk A motion was made to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1 -2 as presented, and as follows: MOTION: Chair Lozano SECOND: Member Garcia Carried 1. MINUTES The minutes of December 15, 2004 were approved as presented. 2. HOUSING DEPARTMENT STATUS REPORT — DECEMBER, 2004 Report received and filed. There being no other matters for discussion, the meeting was adjourned at 9:26 p.m. Approved as presented by the Authority at their meeting held February 16, 2005 Rosemary M. Ramirez, CMC Chief Deputy City Clerk Page 1 of 1 PURPOSE To provide a status report on the Housing Department's: • Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME program activities and • Housing Authority's Section 8 and Public Housing Operations. DISCUSSION The following is a brief description of Housing Department activities and accomplishments for the month of January 2005: 1. 2005 -2010 Five Year Consolidated Plan and FY 2005 -2006 Annual Action Plan The second joint meeting was held with the Parks and Recreation and Housing Commissions on February 3, 2005 at 5:00pm at the Esther Snyder Community Center. The joint Commissions form the CDBG Advisory Committee. At this meeting, Public Service Agencies who submitted a complete, application presented their proposals to the Commission /Committee. The Commission /Committee made their final decision for recommendations for the FY 2005 -2006 CDBG Public Service funding allocations to be presented to the City Council on February 16tH The Public Service Agencies will also be invited to present their proposals to the City Council during the public hearing on February 16tH 2. Amendment to the FY 2000 -2005 Five Year Consolidated Plan — On March 2, 2005, a public hearing will be held to propose an amendment to the FY 2000 -2005 Five Year Consolidated Plan. The City submitted its Consolidated Plan to HUD in May 2000. In accordance with HUD regulations, at the beginning of each year during the five year period, the City is to submit its Annual Action Plan specifying how each goal and objective will be met and identify projects and activity's approved to meet these goals. Included in the goals set are actual beneficiaries that are estimated to be assisted with the funds. Types of beneficiaries include, but are not limited to individuals, households, housing units and streets. At the end of each year, the City is required to submit to HUD its Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER). This end of the year report details the actual amount of funding expended, the total beneficiaries assisted for that year and the cumulative amount for the five -year period. Because the last CAPER completed included four of the five -year accomplishments, staff is able to clearly identify which goals will be met. As evident in the FY 03/04 CAPER, the following goals will most likely not be met and will need to be revised: Activity Current Goal Proposed Goal Assistance with Food Distribution 55,000 Persons 20,000 Persons Residential Rehabilitation Program 180 Households 60 Households Homeownership Opportunities 100 Households 25 Households At the Public Hearing on March 2, 2005, a staff report will be presented to the City Council further detailing the proposed amendments. 3. Residential Rehabilitation Loan Program (RRP) — Two of the approved loans and grants in FY 03/04 are under construction. Three substantial rehabilitation loans were approved in January for FY 04/05. ' Improvements include bedroom and bathroom additions, code violations corrections and basic home improvements. 4. The following represents the Rehabilitation Loan Program activities for the month of January 2005: RRP / LEAD PROGRAMS PROGRESS REPORT FOR FY 03/04 and FY 04/05 ;.:Pro ectDescrc taon,, " . ConimenC ,_4'. , "... , _; ..... _;., . „s. Tlate`cif Coazi ieton> Substantial 17 9 Approved Loans in FY 03/04 Rehabilitation Loans ■ 7 Rehabilitation Completed N/A ■ 2 Under Construction Mid February 8 Approved Loans in FY 04/05 ■ 1 Pending Funds Disbursement Beginning of February ■ 1 Pending Loan CDC Document Revisions Mid February ■ 2 Pending Renewal of Contractor's License Mid February ■ 3 Under Construction Mid May ® 1 Construction to begin February 14 Rehabilitation Grants 14 11Approved Grants in FY 03/04 ■ 10 Rehabilitation Completed N/A ■ 1 Under Construction Beginning of February 3 Approved Grants in FY 04/05 ■ 2 Neighborhood Pride Day Grants Completed N/A ■ 1 Underway in conjunction with substantial rehab Beginning of February loan Rehabilitation Loan Application Phase for Approval in FY 04/05 Applications 12 ■ 5 pending bids submittal from contractors Beginning of February ■ 1 Pending Work Write -up Beginning of February ® 1 Initial Inspection Mid February ■ 4 Initial Review Process Mid February is 1 Client denied due to credit unworthiness Mid January Inquiries 18 Rehabilitation Application Packages issued Pending Client Response Loans Repaid 1 1 Loan Repaid $8,655 Total Monthly Activ?_0 62 $8,655 The following table represents the total FY 04/05 budget for the Residential Rehabilitation Programs: Substantial Rehabilitation Loans $250,000 5 $150,000 $100,000 HOME Funds (Low Income) 20% Housing Set -aside RDA $100,000 3 $100,000 $0 (Moderate Income) Loans Repaid 1 1 loan re aid $8,206 Rehabilitation Grants 58 $8,206 FTHB 20% Set -aside RDA CDBG (Very Low /Low Income) $50,000 3 $13,520 $36,480 Lead Testing- Clearance CDBG $20,000 6 $2,125 $17,875 Lead Testing - Clearance 20% $2,000 4 $1,345 $655 set aside Lead Abatement — CDBG $25,000 0 0 $25,000 Lead Abatement - 20% set aside Pending 1 2,500 Pending TOTALS $447,000 22 $269,490 $180,010 5. First Time Homebuyer Program (FTHB)— GOOD NEWS! - As of January 2004, HUD increased the Los Angeles County maximum purchase price of a home from $290,319 to $312,895. This increase should have a positive impact in the City's First Time Homebuyer Program. FTHB PROGRESS REPORT FOR January 1 — January 31, 2004 Pro`ect Deseri tion ;; t ,, `Comment -: Pro ram Tbeame Generated Inquires 55 Telephone and walk -in inquires from lenders and potential homebu ers. N/A First Time Homebuyer Application 2 0 1 Initial Application in Review a 1 Cancelled due lender not re s ondin Mid February End of January Loans Repaid 1 1 loan re aid $8,206 Total Months Activit 58 $8,206 The following represents the total FY 04/05 budget for the First Time Homebuyer Program: Protect Description Approved ; ,Number of ,.., Amount -'° .. . Balance et Pro'ects A roved Committed' FTHB HOME Funds $250,000 0 $0 $250,000 Low Income FTHB 20% Set -aside RDA $300,000 0 $0 $300,000 Moderate Income TOTALS 1 $550,000 01 $0 $550,000 HOUSING CHOICE VOUCHER PROGRAM INSPECTIONS �Aeti�rt c , ame I3escri ptio' ,..,,. Annual Inspections 61 Annual inspections conducted on assisted units on an annual Incoming portables 9 Active Section 8 families initially from other Housing Annual Follow -ups 4 Authorities throughout the USA porting in to BPHA. 0 New admissions either from the waiting list or New Admissions 13 incoming portables. Annual Reexamination Annual reviews of participants' income and family Initial Follow -ups 141 composition. Interim Reexamination Changes made to participants' income /rent 36 increases/change of ownership, etc. Portability Move -in 4 Participants who transferred their assistance to BPHA Propose Terminations 7 and leased a unit. Portability Move -out Participant who transferred outside agency's Abatement 4 jurisdiction and a HAP Contract was executed. Port -out update 6 Changes made to the outgoing billable portables. End of Participation 2 Participants that are no longer receiving Section 8. Other (Change of Unit) 4 Current participants moving from one unit to another. Vouchers issued 7 Participants who were issued vouchers (excludes families selected from waiting list with issued vouchers.) Vouchers expired 0 Applicants from the waiting list with expired vouchers. Total activity 216 INSPECTIONS �Aeti�rt c , ame I3escri ptio' ,..,,. Annual Inspections 61 Annual inspections conducted on assisted units on an annual basis to ensure they meet Housing Quality Standards (HQS) Annual Follow -ups 4 2d performed to ensure that all deficiencies were corrected. Initial Inspections 13 Inspection performed prior to the execution of a new Housing Assistance Payment Contract. Initial Follow -ups 4 2° Inspection performed to ensure all deficiencies were corrected prior to executing a Housing Assistance Payments Contract with a landlord. Special Inspections 4 Inspections conducted at the request of the owner or tenant. Propose Terminations 0 Participants who failed to be present on the date of the scheduled inspection. These are called "no- show's" Abatement 0 Landlord's who are in breach of the HAP Contract for failure to correct HQS deficiencies and Housing Assistance payments are suspended. Total activity 86 Activi Name uantit Descri foe`° Non - emergency work orders 1 Minor required repairs reported by the Public Housing tenants at McNeill Manor Senior Apartments. Annual certifications completed 2 Annual review of the Public Housing tenant's income and family composition. Emergency work order 1 Work orders requiring immediate repair within 24- hours. Total Activity 4 7. Section 8 Waiting List — Staff is in the process of updating the Section 8 waiting list. The waiting list application line was open from January 6, 2003 — July 29, 2003. There are currently 3,310 applicants listed in the Housing Authority's Elite HUD software system. Interest letters were mailed to each applicant on the waiting who reside in the Baldwin Park Housing Authority's jurisdiction, which includes Baldwin Park, South El Monte, El Monte, Monrovia and West Covina. Applicants are requested to return the Interest letters verifying that there are still interested in the Section 8 Voucher Program. It is anticipated that the amount of applicants on the waiting list will be reduced once the update is completed. 8. The Resident Advisory Board Appointments for Five Year PHA Fiscal and Annual Plan for the years 2005-2009 is scheduled for the February 16, 2005 Meeting. The PHA Plan is a comprehensive guide to Public Housing Agency (PHA) policies, programs, operations and strategies for meeting local housing needs and goals. One of the first stages of the process is to establish a Resident Advisory Board. Letters inviting participants of the HCV Program to participate on the board have been mailed out. We have received five letter of interest from concerned citizens. The deadline to submit letters of interest was February 1, 2005. 9. A Special Public Hearing for the Housing Authority Board will be requested for April 6th. A special meeting is needed in order to submit the PHA"S Five Year Fiscal and Annual Plan for the years 2005-2009 by HODS deadline date of April 15, 2005. 10. The Section 8 staff has purchased the HS Inspections Module. This purchase of this module has been implemented and staff is looking forward to utilizing the new software. This module will provide complete workflow design that will allow us to streamline day-to-day processes through automation. Manual processes such as generating quality assurance inspections, producing correspondence, tracking inspections history, scheduling appointments, and automatic re-inspections can be automated within this new system. RECOMMENDATION, It is recommended that the City Council receive and file this report. Total number of active applicants in the Applicants listed in the Section 8 waiting list. Section 8 waiting list 3,310 Total number of active applicants in the Applicants listed in the Public Housing Waiting List. Public Housing waiting list 75 (Last months count: 77) Total active Housing Assistance Payments Unit Month Report 743 (HAP) Contract as of September 30, 2004. (Last month's count: 744) 7. Section 8 Waiting List — Staff is in the process of updating the Section 8 waiting list. The waiting list application line was open from January 6, 2003 — July 29, 2003. There are currently 3,310 applicants listed in the Housing Authority's Elite HUD software system. Interest letters were mailed to each applicant on the waiting who reside in the Baldwin Park Housing Authority's jurisdiction, which includes Baldwin Park, South El Monte, El Monte, Monrovia and West Covina. Applicants are requested to return the Interest letters verifying that there are still interested in the Section 8 Voucher Program. It is anticipated that the amount of applicants on the waiting list will be reduced once the update is completed. 8. The Resident Advisory Board Appointments for Five Year PHA Fiscal and Annual Plan for the years 2005-2009 is scheduled for the February 16, 2005 Meeting. The PHA Plan is a comprehensive guide to Public Housing Agency (PHA) policies, programs, operations and strategies for meeting local housing needs and goals. One of the first stages of the process is to establish a Resident Advisory Board. Letters inviting participants of the HCV Program to participate on the board have been mailed out. We have received five letter of interest from concerned citizens. The deadline to submit letters of interest was February 1, 2005. 9. A Special Public Hearing for the Housing Authority Board will be requested for April 6th. A special meeting is needed in order to submit the PHA"S Five Year Fiscal and Annual Plan for the years 2005-2009 by HODS deadline date of April 15, 2005. 10. The Section 8 staff has purchased the HS Inspections Module. This purchase of this module has been implemented and staff is looking forward to utilizing the new software. This module will provide complete workflow design that will allow us to streamline day-to-day processes through automation. Manual processes such as generating quality assurance inspections, producing correspondence, tracking inspections history, scheduling appointments, and automatic re-inspections can be automated within this new system. RECOMMENDATION, It is recommended that the City Council receive and file this report.