HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013 10 02NOTICE AND CALL
OF A
SPECIAL MEETING
OF THE
CITY COUNCIL
TO THE MEMBERS OF THE AFOREMENTIONED AGENCIES AND THE CITY CLERK OF
THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Special Meeting is hereby called to be held on
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 2, 2013 at 6:30 PM. at City Hall — 3rd Floor Conference Room 307,
14403 East Pacific Avenue, Baldwin Park, CA 91706.
Said Special Meeting shall be for the purpose of conducting business in accordance with
the attached Agenda.
NO OTHER BUSINESS WILL BE DISCUSSED
Dated: September 26, 2013
Manuel Lozano
Mayor
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
I, Alejandra Avila, City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, certify that I caused the
aforementioned Notice and Call of a Special Meeting to be delivered via email (hard copy to
follow) to each Member and e -mail to the San Gabriel Valley Tribune, and that I posted said
notice as required by law on September 26, 2013.
Alejandra Avila
City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL MEETING
Please note
time and
meeting
OCTOBER 2, 2013 location
E:3® PIS
CITY HALL — 3rd Floor, Conference Room 307
14403 FAST PACIFIC AZ'E.",►'UE
BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706
(626) 960 -4011
Manuel Lozano
Monica Garcia
Marlen Garcia
Ricardo Pacheco
Susan Rubio
- Mayor
- Mayor Pro Tern
- Councilmember
- Councilmember
- Councilmember
PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES AND PAGERS WHILE MEETING IS IN PROCESS
POR FAVOR DE APAGAR SUS TELEFONOS CELULARES Y BEEPERS DURANTE LA JUNTA
PUBLIC COMMENTS COMENTARIOS DEL PUBLICO
The public is encouraged to address the City Se invita al publico a dirigirse al Concilio o cualquiera
Council or any of its Agencies listed on this otra de sus Agencias nombradas en esta agenda,
agenda on any matter posted on the agenda or para hablar sobre cualquier asunto publicado en la
on any other matter within its jurisdiction. If you agenda o cualquier tema que este bajo su jurisdiccidn.
wish to address the City Council or any of its Si usted desea la oportunidad de dirigirse al Concilio a
Agencies, you may do so during the PUBLIC alguna de sus Agencias, podra hacerlo durante el
COMMUNICATIONS period noted on the periodo de Comentarios del Pdblico (Public
agenda. Each person is allowed three (3) Communications) anunciado en la agenda. A cada
minutes speaking time. A Spanish- speaking persona se le permite hablar par tres (3) min utos. Hay
interpreter is available for your convenience. un interprete para su conveniencia.
CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL MEETING — 6:30 PM
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL: Council Members: Marlen Garcia, Ricardo Pacheco,
Susan Rubio, Mayor Pro Tern Monica Garcia
and Mayor Manuel Lozano
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
Three (3) minute speaking time limit
Tres (3) minutos sera e/ limite para hablar
THIS IS THE TIME SET ASIDE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
PLEASE NOTIFY THE CITY CLERK IF YOU REQUIRE THE SERVICES OF AN INTERPRETER
No action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances
exist. The legislative body or its staff may: I) Briefly respond to statements made or questions asked by persons; or 2) Direct
staff to investigate and/or schedule matters for consideration at a future meeting. [Government Code §54954.2]
ESTE ES EL PERIODO DESIGNADO PARA DIRIGIRSE AL CONCILIO
FAVOR DE NOTIFICAR A LA SECRETARIA S1 REQUIERE LOS SERVICIOS DEL INTERPRETE
No se podra tomar acci6n en alg6n asunto a menos que sea incluido en la agenda, o a menos que exista algOna
emergencia o circunstancia especial. El cuerpo legislativo y su personal podran, - 1) Responder brevemente a
declaraci6nes o preguntas hechas por personas; o 2) Dirigir personal a investigar y10 fijar asuntos para tomar en
consideraci6n en juntas proximas, [Codigo de Gobierno §54954.2]
RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION
1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR (GC §54957.6)
Agency Negotiators: Vijay Singhal, Chief Executive Officer and other
representatives as designated
Employee Organizations: SEIU; Clerical; Professional and Technical Employees;
Police Management Employees; Confidential Employees-,
Confidential Management and the Baldwin Park Police
Officer's Association-, Un-represented employees-, and part-
time employees.
2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION
(GC §54956.9 (d)(1)
Adams et. al. v. City of Baldwin Park et. al., USDC Case No.: CV12-00512 GAF(AJWx)
BPPOA v. City of Baldwin Park et al., USDC Case No: CV1 3-01534 DMG (VBKx)
BPPOA v. City of Baldwin Park, LASC Case No: BS140802
RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION
REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION
J
ADJOURNMENT
CERTIFICATION
I, Alejandra Avila, City Cleric of the City of Baldwin Park hereby certify under penalty of perjury under
the laws of the State of California that the foregoing agenda was posted on the City Hall bulletin board
not less than 24 hours prior to the meeting on September 26, 2013.
Jj
y
y
r t F
Alejandra Avila
City Clerk
PLEASE NOTE: Copies of staff reports and supporting documentation pertaining to each item on this agenda are
available for public viewing and inspection at City Hall, 2"d Floor Lobby Area or at the Los Angeles County Public Library
in the City of Baldwin Park. For further information regarding agenda items, please contact the office of the City Cleric at
(626) 813 -5204 ore -mail rcaballeroCcDbaldwinpark.com.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please
contact the Public Works Department or Risk Management at (626) 960 -4011. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting
will enable staff to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. (28 CFR 34.102.104 ADA
TITLE ll)
I
r •
OCTOBER r
00 PM I
COUNCIL CHAMBER
14403 E. Pacific Avenue
Baldwin Park, CA 91706
(626) 960 -4011
BALDWIN
b - _R
Manuel Lozano
Monica Garcia
Marlen Garcia
Ricardo Pacheco
Susan Rubio
- Mayor
- Mayor Pro Tern
- Council Member
- Council Member
- Council Member
PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES AND PAGERS WHILE MEETING IS IN PROCESS
POR FAVOR DE APAGAR SUS TELEFONOS CELULARES Y BEEPERS DURANTE LA JUNTA
PUBLIC COMMENTS
The public is encouraged to address the City
Council or any of its Agencies listed on this
agenda on any matter posted on the agenda or
on any other matter within its jurisdiction. If you
wish to address the City Council or any of its
Agencies, you may do so during the PUBLIC
COMMUNICATIONS period noted on the
agenda. Each person is allowed three (3)
minutes speaking time. A Spanish speaking
interpreter is available for your convenience.
COMENTARIOS DEL PUBLICO
Se invita al publico a dirigirse al Concilio o cualquiera
otra de sus Agencias nombradas en esta agenda, para
hablar sobre cualquier asunto publicado en la agenda o
cualquier tema que este bajo su jurisdiccidn. Si usted
desea la oportunidad de dirigirse al Concilio o alguna de
sus Agencias, podrJ hacerlo durante el periodo de
Comentarios del Publico (Public Communications)
anunciado en la agenda. A cada persona se le permite
hablar por tres (3) minutos. Hay un interprete para su
conveniencia.
CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING — 7:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
INVOCATION
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL_
Council Members: Marlen Garcia, Ricardo Pacheco,
Susan Rubio, Mayor Pro Tern Monica Garcia
and Mayor Manuel Lozano
ANNOUNCEMENTS
This is to announce, as required by Government Code section 54954.3, members of the City
Council are also members of the Board of Directors of the Housing Authority and Finance
Authority, which are concurrently convening with the City Council this evening and each
Council Member is paid an additional stipend of $30 for attending the Housing Authority
meeting and $50 for attending the Finance Authority meeting,
PROCLAMATIONS, COMMENDATIONS & PRESENTATIONS
• Certificate recognition for years of service to Outgoing Planning Commissioner George
Silva.
0 Oath of Office for new Planning Commissioners Gustavo Huizar and Edwin Borques.
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
Three (3) minute speaking time limit
Tres (3) minutos sera el limite para hablar
THIS IS THE TIME SET ASIDE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
PLEASE NOTIFY THE CITY CLERK IF YOU REQUIRE THE SERVICES OF AN INTERPRETER
No action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special
circumstances exist. The legislative body or its staff may. - 1) Briefly respond to statements made or questions
asked by persons; - or 2) Direct staff to investigate and /or schedule matters for consideration at a future meeting.
[Government Code §54954.2]
ESTE ES EL PERIODO DESIGNADO PARA DIRIGIRSE AL CONCILIO
FAVOR DE NOTIFICAR A LA SECRETARIA SI REQUIERE LOS SERVICIOS DEL INTERPRETE
No se podra tome acci6n en alg6n asunto a menos que sea incluido en /a agenda, o a menos que exista algOna
emergencia a circunstancia especial. El cuerpo legislativo y su personal podran, - 1) Responder brevemente a
declaraci6nes o preguntas hechas por personas,- o 2) Dirigir personal a investigar y10 fijar asuntos para tomar en
consideraci6n en juntas proximas, [Codigo de Gobierno §54954.2]
City Council Agenda — OCTOBER 2, 2013 Page 2
CONSENT CALENDAR
All items listed are considered to be routine business by the City Council and will be approved with one motion. There will be
no separate discussion of these items unless a City Councilmember so requests, in which case, the item will be removed from
the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda.
1. WARRANTS AND DEMANDS
Staff recommends City Council ratify the attached Warrants and Demands.
2. PURCHASE OF MOBILE IN CAR CAMERA SYSTEMS
Staff recommends that City Council grant approval to:
1) Waive the formal bidding process pursuant to §34.23(C) of the Baldwin Park
Municipal Code for the purchase of L3 Mobile- Version Inc. system,
2) Designate an amount not to exceed $29,430.00 from Cost Center 205-30-
1310-513390-00000-2 for the restricted purchase of the new police department
equipment, and
3) Authorize the Chief of Police, or her designee, to complete all appropriate
documentation to complete the purchases.
3. INTRODUCE ORDINANCE NO. 1360 AMENDING SECTION 125.010 AND 125.020
OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE TO PROHIBIT THE SALE OF SINGLE
CIGARS
Staff recommends that the City Council introduce by first reading by title only Ordinance
No. 1360, "AN ORDINANCE OF CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
AMENDING SECTIONS 125.010 AND 125.020 OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL
CODE TO PROHIBIT THE SALE OF SINGLE CIGARS (APPLICANT: CITY OF
BALDWIN PARK) ."
SET MATTERS - PUBLIC HEARINGS (7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard), If in the future you
wish to challenge the following in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing
described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk and /or City Council at or prior to the public hearing.
4. HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE (AGP -116)
It is recommended that the City Council open the public hearing, receive any public
comments, and following the public hearing adopt Resolution 2013 -034 entitled, "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
APPROVING AN UPDATE TO THE HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN
FOR THE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE 2014 -2021 PLANNING PERIOD AND
ADOPTING THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT (APPLICANT: CITY OF BALDWIN PARK; CASE NO. AGP - 116)."
City Council Agenda — OCTOBER 2, 2013
Page 3
5. AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY'S MUNICIPAL CODE ADDING SECTION
153.170.107 RELATING TO THE CREATION OF A COMPREHENSIVE SIGN
PROGRAM; AND THE ADOPTION OF THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (APPLICANT: KAISER PERMANENTE; CASE
NUMBER: AZC -174)
Staff recommends City Council to adopt Resolution 2013 -035 titled "A RESOLUTION
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK APPROVING AND
ADOPTING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR
AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY'S MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO
COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PROGRAMS. (APPLICANT: KAISER PERMANENTE;
CASE NUMBER: AZC - 174)." and
Staff recommends City CvunGii introduce �y first reading by title only Ordinance 1359,
"AN ORDINANCE OF CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ADDING
SECTION 153.170.107 TO THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO
COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PROGRAMS. (LOCATION: ALL COMMERCIAL,
INDUSTRIAL AND MIXED USE ZONES; APPLICANT: KAISER PERMANENTE;
CASE NUMBER: AZC- 174)."
CITY COUNCIL ACTING AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
CONSENT CALENDAR
All items listed are considered to be routine business by the City Council and will be approved with one motion. There will
be no separate discussion of these items unless a City Councilmember so requests, in which case, the item will be
removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda.
1. APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. SA- 2013 -002 APPROVING THE LONG RANGE
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR EACH OF THE REAL PROPERTY ASSETS
OF THE FORMER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION BY THE
GOVERNING BOARD OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
It is recommended that the Successor Agency of the Community Development
Commission of the City of Baldwin Park adopt Resolution No. SA -2013 -002 entitled: "A
RESOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK APPROVING A
LONG -RANGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLAN PREPARED PURSUANT TO
HEALTH & SAFETY CODE, SECTION 34191.5 FOR THE DISPOSITION OF REAL
PROPERTY ASSETS OF THE FORMER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK"
City Council Agenda — OCTOBER 2, 2013
Page 4
CITY COUNCIL / CITY CLERK / CITY TREASURER / STAFF REQUESTS &
COMMUNICATIONS
Request by Mayor Manuel Lozano for discussion & direction to staff on the following:
• Contact Baldwin Park Police Association to inform them the City Council would like to
have all present MOU negotiations done in public session to ensure the public is aware
of all aspects of the negotiations and to seek their consent for that.
CERTIFICATION
I, Alejandra Avila, City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park hereby certify under penalty of perjury
under the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing agenda was posted on the City Hall
bulletin board not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting. Dated this 26th day of September
2013.
r"
Alejandra Avila
City Clerk
PLEASE NOTE: Copies of staff reports and supporting documentation pertaining to each item on this agenda are
available for public viewing and inspection at City Hall, 2nd Floor Lobby Area or at the Los Angeles County Public
Library in the City of Baldwin Park. For further information regarding agenda items, please contact the office of
the City Clerk at (626) 813 -5204 or via e -mail at rcaballeroCcbbaldwin park. com.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this
meeting, please contact the Public Works Department or Risk Management at (626) 960 -4011. Notification 48
hours prior to the meeting will enable staff to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this
meeting. (28 CFR 34.102.104 ADA TITLE II)
City Council Agenda — OCTOBER 2, 2013
Page 5
i
e�
BALDWIN
P . d P . K
TO:
FROM:
Date:
SUBJECT:
PURPOSE:
r.
CITY OF BALDWIN PARK STAFF REPORT
ITEM M0.
October 02, 2013
Warrants and Demands
The purpose of this report is for the City Council to ratify the payment of Warrants and
Demands against the City of Baldwin Park.
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION:
The attached Claims and Demands report format meets the required information in
accordance with the Government Code. Staff reviews requests for expenditures for
budgetary approval and for authorization from the department head or its designee. The
report provides information on payments released since the previous City Council meeting,
the following is a summary of the payments released:
1. The payroll of the City of Baldwin Park consisting of check numbers 195792 —
195818. Additionally, Automatic Clearing House (ACH) Payroll deposits were made
on behalf of City Employees from control numbers 231 088 — 231 342 for the period
of September 01, 2013 through September 14, 2013 inclusive; these are presented
and hereby ratified, in the amount of $348,408.72.
2. General Warrants, including check numbers 197041 to197170 inclusive, in the total
amount of $448,063.88 constituting claims and demands against the City of Baldwin
Park, are herewith presented to the City Council as required by law, and the same
hereby ratified.
Pursuant to Section 37208 of the Government Code, the Chief Executive Officer or
designee does hereby certify to the accuracy of the demands hereinafter referred to and to
the availability of funds for payment thereof.
Staff recommends City Council ratify the attached Warrants and Demands.
No w MAWWWO
MA no
I C"WK004 Now
o"o
a gums 2 hex
?
g,o, 11mg. a. Pj.
wzw
5 mn, Zo —"4AQK2 0
go ;I NEVVIV
ov
i 08120*
09 1; 40 1 H
"Wo how
2. 91 "W
� I w v
4 too t o 1 w I w
mmw w w
I I t
w w
w w w w Q
9 1 i
car Cx ca
No F1'
No
WMV —0
Q of 6§
UP A
<<m Qw
G
y z
nn
9 . w t4
um
ww wm
Aw Am Who Q.
so *6
to to
MON 00 ON
fivaAP &W ww
w low go
lo
rs
w
21
so 0 : Ii
0
Ell
Lr.
ee
Rya
4 i3
K lvPi
Era' o
Arms& 40 n" cJ
99 9 9W
I
Ki No ..P.O KW= WP up W, �O moo ^0 wo Nw"W"O W, wo
me 4t it vi M IM As
P-6 jS its is iz M 4 0
I
in
105
GA MW omw ow A 55MMAW
wo
wn y MW W �WWWW o
4_
nw 0Q
no I o" H
&A 0 w on, 19 A 0
0 w """tot
vi 71 vi ?0
01, 0''
No 0 40000 v
z 9 o ff 505ow Q
w ..
Il 8 49A awIoAO a P� N . V. . l K n . . g
Ix Q Z" gly; go a ij'w
A 0 a H z og XV joOh Y�4 9 t :,0.
a a IN RP 80y a, 82 QqN ii I
Z' rz
45 Ri WE 12
00 E
M 82 V4 20 C' +-I K ;
""a eq a". so no WHO I No a Ys
or
am wo H
81
Her c bra ct 14
CAS No
is
on
M&AW
w W IN,
loop
MOM= wo
is to as A t too 99 M
Now AgKg1:2mqq,q "S
n MyloA wwwwwwo
?
Ii W f
f
pow" o mm
0 00000 00000
QW000104
0 0 w0*0wWwo
qN
No
tW
ut
I Rog"
f
low
T. W - W =:WWW
to
N to
IX 0 OW0000 W 0 m
0;v "-gRy ev""P"PQ MW 0
al mAgun 4- V- -
MINIMS= 0
oiX M 9m VP WALLOW= P; ri
0 1= v ww"We" z
K notion 0�1 0 '0
MO 9CCM91 c R2 i
80V At 9 - P 4 T m- Y" -
v vcvv x
KKV 00 1 p q m to
w.V coal'' 19 vv
QWM%YM,3 W2 P- 0
550 a
mommm Ow
IN In 2001MVIVIV,
yvv Q Hp m mmn
mm a Nava A
or 0 VOW 94 ... HUM
HIM""
mg " M du
Sal
.0-00-0000000
a7a s3@ A Y. *00*4- M. so saw%mowwo 0
n- =00AW000"
40
m
In
0
cs V, W z
31
0,
n n w all C, an 0 " m on- "Aw W m w m
0 � woo p 00 M W O Oems t it ! Y? v 't
sl 66r i 4 n 1.4y 11,
Wad Ing TOM M.; 0.
swo "'T 00 OR *A, &As A
sw on .,. O W W Mo%
Vv xt� It 2
TO
4a1 ad: n m"MSTUAnsw WW &W cow low W I
In Wm
W w Q W, WWWW=5452 0, WWI W Wp
WWWQW� --g m Ki M
Of *00 12 9 1 Ali 990 91
MOMMAOS299 9 00 COOK&
41B &7 00=91. 00 ow 0
Q 00 0 ISM 92999
9 W Q =10
"ONuvww"W"
moo
&ohm
us 00
Am p --KIMM, go &Z XAN MO
WO Mo x v z
z
A
Q
I IMP go 'F
-- V WHY,
8 8Mx -a A n gas Ri -
mmg 2
492 M95-
i 9 v m 1421 as
"Woo I son W
01
OW A
f-0
Wns
I 7j
ON
Wows gt
W 4
slow WW
Ins a,
wf
T?T
SH!
oil" SEW S" MEW
I to ??i?
1M
too" it* A*
as
Ell
it it
j, W ll
to still'' WW''
11 topic! MM!
rfi S99s2z
W-UHI HIM:
V Hiss ''M
HIH 111111
441014 1=411.
mom, nn, 122 !- !!!!1- 111111
1 M H ill'! N,
1 1.
Mo; to
wwo 0 Not
RUN I hill
SAM 88040
as-, an
1111" Oil
_WU QWW8 Q wly g q W W, W MMA&KA
"rJ` 'Reg 5 EEI a W M11 Mao-
M L:
I
4
I
Ci
M
WEE- R- is
lnE
M I t It Ell-
801: a M
MPIE aj 1 8m
go .24
A K
i Ymn
lip m 0 11
Q N MEN
pm p.s
Oil
HR
Ell
4t 3t? 3d3
E E E
SAW
list! 11 1
Vim F5 s
MV
EIEE.
v,
A 7 v
EMU humm Owl
-1,; poppy& mv,
z It
i F
za
tik
m
1
BP, -4 J
t
'0 ;.
:021
THAM99WON low On ana"Wav
Its it igiygiz ?z I Toyfuss''
Mo 0, a, A
91192s?
0 1 1 9 1 i A I t 0
pox
v p y N=ymny. 4
- v 440v
v i HUMMV W
11 Mw_"Wx W< "n ID
&&As, " ''I M&KNEVVI IQ �j
WARM f" mm VMS 02 M.4 runnon"Wh
15v n MWN ow
Urlow • HIM to 0�6 ev 0 Q
"4112" q , 9' Az
qfif� aff IJA 2 TZ
A
iWWvQWvvW9vTT 90 jS SHP
iv"O", "Mgt" 0% 0c ng penmy
s=_W" E rK rappyro z
2z z
z .`x.? 0 4
j Im Imp Ad
x HIM i
I
Q00000
WMIiii ON !!!ywy 0 W 0 &&&W-
zoom 0"PAIM W WWW M A
sow& W W 0 ,a . . . . HP
INV WA`W&W&W= "W A W"WOW-14 0
I slog
to"" Mto to
ffi
10 14 Irl
GA �m -4 15 m"o
w
C* Irz
In 1Pa
tm kn 0 &A o'n
fft 0 'o
0 o,
T4 W
E RE -C 0
to a
in
rA
W:A
011
mJ
Svl
0
0 A^# po.
ej 15 c 0 231
+J"w
" � W 00 o 4o ac�,X,
m ON q, {FY ..O Q, t, 0
0000 O'o 000
0
0 oc�
0 0 0
?
St
Qj M
"to, X t-
CPCis 0 wo to) oo om
M M M 99 mmmmm
74" w x 'M
mm m 1p,
to m tN 44i'
ir, 0 1A 0 �A �A
- w - 0 v
k4 ko -� ch AA Ilb, �11 �p A.
dJ
0 IA C,
as ma
'C' 0-
ti
0 -c' va
CP
K ff
G,
ry
w ' e9
0 4h, � 'a j
&I In ol ill 011 eA oll m M MVI
4� a, 1�11 w 'o In 0% oll m
0 bd1 Q, V,
0.
0
10 0 0 ot>
010 C>
O 0 10 0
f4 fj
hi In �01
W 14 t�l
w ;c 40 01
Xl
14
016W
W
15T
im IT, w 10 10 ID ka
w W w AA �m 0 W
lb 11:1 9l, 1*1 u w - Q
10 g, 4' - t�
It-
4A an w
x 24
13 -4
w
I't
W4
0
El
0
gist R M bid ES
Gk W -J y
4{Y. pill m 11,11
5E
iq- g- PEER-
MF
oil- P Mh
1% A HIS
911 N Whyn,
EE 1 YR pad
73 S3 4d
Yt am
Own
tit
Egli
no i-'
ESi
ALL
ti IN
W9 Sa
53 d
Opt
< 8
n
ion
ra ::ywx ows
ka; No: A its, hq�'
Ex oil m 2i nig 111
H 111
21
so
A.A. as
WIN
gn
V, oil! R1
,S'. oil 11;
esx
as
dsS
13
t3 R:X 0 won -.0 . .. . . . N
.0 wow st-it W P, F
V IN .5 .W, I
NASA: khm- mv 009 Wz &WS"Ab 3 0
Ub MMM 11H MIMI HIR 119 11 HIM 11
lots 1 w Az A AZ to
.c3 .+;a � . willow MEW 11" as
1. Hit
ap !MMII HII Mh HE
a Sm MIMI 1777M ME m
000 11111 ill! !I i` - , :
i i i i i2' 77-
nice-
!!%
131111 ph NO 11CHIM 9i
E VAN ASIA ggaji H
W p2ij I I I - 2 ,g :; 11MY
f""W"Awym Q K F-ralli or spok, -0
?let HAII i 9.eg:oiZ H UP SM gh Cy W 8 0 w —W
NI I S, I
Q! 55
41
toss 1112
w kA
ire. . WW i Ant,
I m 0 Otto O s T r y ?I
10
0 WNW W-0-0 NO WWWWO m . . . W W Q W a a "Y.
mm 0"m 000000W Ow 9000W W=QQ0Wm Q ov 7m-
g I
WWWWnw
mo� 001000� 00v
nQ is is A&I �1�141&45 11—W k& —
119wW wwwwmw WW 022
0 &&&pop W &I
W: &0 W. WOOL OWOO&W 0 A A Now
00 m Sll W "H WWW-W& W wwww ww-www' Wo -S wo
-00 WWWW"'y wo wwwwy P-""- - 11 �� I.,
W W tl 4mw low
N I "a T� 9 1 i 999 all Is is "TO
i'm — — w —f 4l 1 1
W W n w =05000 Q 0 0
P"-K 000000 A
as "t"
"1 0 9 2 . .
0 mg sss---
000002 2 1. M229 9 2 1
AAL4i4 4 4 A ii, i
IN
Ki CS go 2. 24W HH"HwUl A. IR190 WgIv. ;W iN u VA.w k
3 1 "8 Wait 8 n I'lHal 2 9 2 NMI
MO mnocw Qm— mmw m< m< M =v
p vs Ago moo...E "=199 g A
so 19t %p99% ;v "10 80 OF g. F
I to x I mo mn got
'Y m 12 i 2
4fiff2" " 1900 n 0
W 12 own "mmlown IV W m m qu
egg cenc cm 0 �4 g
it A 44 U
g 2 W
gAi
9RT mm
0 . W
004
xai
I
as,
19
SZE
8,6
aft
ag9:
4>
RO
sh
is.
1.
WIC
mm
Cs
I
Purpose
The purpose of this staff report is to provide data and recommendations relative
to the purchase and installation of four police unit in car L3 Mobile Vision camera
systems and accessories.
Background /Discussion
In 2011, the police department purchased 28 L3 mobile cameras systems for
police cars and police motorcycles. The department also purchased a server
and technical hardware to facilitate the program.
To date the program has been an asset to the department in terms of capturing
valuable video to assist in the prosecution of criminal cases. The cameras also
increase officer safety and deescalate situations that officers felt were becoming
confrontational by informing citizens that they were being recorded.
Four of the in car camera systems purchased have become inoperable and
cannot be repaired. Six of the officer worn microphones also need replacement.
Staff recommends the cameras and microphones be replaced with the same L3
Mobile Vision cameras and microphones to utilize the established L3 Mobile
Vision department infrastructure.
Staff requests that Council approve the purchase of the related equipment from
L3 Mobile- Vision Inc. pursuant to Baldwin Park Municipal Code § 34.23 (C).
Putting this purchase out to formal publicized bid is uneconomical as choosing a
new vendor would require a new system and supporting infrastructure.
Staff has determined sufficient funds for this purchase exist in the department's
Federal Asset Forfeiture cost center. The use of such funds to purchase this
equipment and system is permitted through federal law.
Fiscal Impact
There will be no negative impact to the general fund. The police department will
utilize federal asset forfeiture funds.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that City Council grant approval to:
1. Waive the formal bidding process pursuant to §34.23(C) of the Baldwin
Park Municipal Code for the purchase of L3 Mobile- Vision Inc. system,
2. Designate an amount not to exceed $29,430.00 from Cost Center
205 -30 -310- 53390- 00000 -2 for the restricted purchase of the new police
department equipment, and
3. Authorize the Chief of Police, or her designee, to complete all
appropriate documentation to complete the purchases.
Attachments
• L3 Mobile Vision, Inc. Quote
c.
Mobile-Vision, In
SO Fanny Rd, Boonton, NJ 07005
T, 800-336-8475 F�B73-25,-3O24
Sold To
Baldwin Park Police Department
DovidRuynoun
144O3E Pacific Avenue
Baldwin Pa/k, CA 91706
Phone 620'98-01955388.227
Fax 626-338-5545
QUOTE
Number 23783222
Date September 0l2013
Ship To
Baldwin Park Police Department
DaxidReynono
144U3E Pacific Avenue
Baldwin Park, CA 91706
Phone 028'96-0.1955 398.227
Fax 626-338-5545
Signing below ism lieu ofu formal Purchase Order.
Your signature will authorize acceptance of both pricing and product:
Signed: Dated:
L-a Shipping Terms are FOB Boonton, NJ. ey signing below you agree m
waive vourohippmn terms and ship this order FOB Boonton, NJ.
Signed: Dated:
SubTotal
Salesperson
P.O. Number
Ship Via
Terms
Mike Ries
$29,430.00
None
Line
City SKU
Description
Unit Price
Ext-Price Comments
4 MVD-FB3DVS
Flashback 3 Digital Video System
$5,295.00
$21,180.00
»
^ m«D-«'p2-o/
Option, Flashback Dual Voice Link
$565.00
m2,26000
Plus 2 Wireless Microphone
System
o
«mvovLpu-rnx
Assembly, Voice Link Plus u
$255.00
m1.530.00
Transmitter wYBo|t Clip, VLP2S''&
4O'' Lapel Microphones
4
4 IVIvoow2-24/5513x
Stud mount antenna 1O'cables
m119.00
*».»«
(RF'1S5&RG'174) with SmA0MA
bolt configuration (not magmount)
black Dome Antenna
a
* mvo-pa'ox»
Cable Kit, DVR. trunk w/o OHCnr
m180.00
$».»»
VVindshie|dMnt
a
*Mvo'/n-u^Mu
Option, Flashback |R Camera 2
$295.00
$1.180.00
w/14Ftcable
r
* mvusnxo*'aAru
Collision Sensor: Triggers
a198.00
mreu.«»
Flashback DvR into Record mode
in the event vfacollision.
u
4 //worxLLAnow
»572.00
m2.288.00
Signing below ism lieu ofu formal Purchase Order.
Your signature will authorize acceptance of both pricing and product:
Signed: Dated:
L-a Shipping Terms are FOB Boonton, NJ. ey signing below you agree m
waive vourohippmn terms and ship this order FOB Boonton, NJ.
Signed: Dated:
SubTotal
$29,230.00
Tax
TBlEh
Total
$29,430.00
QmOtatl,011 is valid for 60 days hrorn date issued. -These cornioodities.technology or software were exportedhrorn the United
States in accordance with the Export AdministrsdcmregU|ations Diversion contrary mU8law is prohibited.
n+�f"n ",=/rar,��="^ r,,�= " =,."°^.x=*
0910612013 3-50 prn Page I of I
LILLCL/
;1 r
B
ITEM N0, 3
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Marc Castagnola, AICP, Community Development Manager, a
DATE: October 2, 2013
SUBJECT: Introduce Ordinance No. 1360 Amending Section 125.010 and
125.020 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code to Prohibit the Sale of
Single Cigars
.•
This report requests the City Council consider adopting Ordinance No. 1360, amending
Sections 125.010 and 125.020 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code to prohibit the sale
of single cigars.
In the past several years, the City Council expressed interest in adopting measures to
continue to improve the quality of life for the residents of Baldwin Park. The City has
made efforts to promote health in the built environment and to make becoming a
healthier community an integral part of how the City does business.
On October 1St, 2008, the City Council adopted Ordinance 1321, adding Chapter 125 to
the Baldwin Park Municipal Code requiring a tobacco retail license. The local tobacco
retail licensing ordinance reduces youth access to tobacco products and limits the
negative public health effects associated with tobacco use. However, other tobacco
products have entered the market including single cigars often sold in attractive colorful
packaging with original names. Those little cigars and cigarillos are available in various
flavors (such as grape, cotton candy,) and are appealing to price- sensitive youth.
Currently, the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) permits the sale of single cheap
cigars, which can be priced as low as $0.39 -$1.00 each.
According to a survey of tobacco retail stores in Baldwin Park conducted by the Los
Angeles County Department of Health Services, 78% of stores sold single cigarillos,
with price ranging from $0.49 to $2.00 per cigarillos; 40% of stores placed the cigarillos
within 3 feet of candy displays; in addition, 46% of stores placed little cigars near the
candy displays, and 57% of stores sold tobacco leaf cigar wraps (see Attachment 1).
Again, according to the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, research
shows youth are frequently exposed to tobacco ads at retail stores, which may increase
October 2, 2013
Ordinance No. 1360
Page 2 of 4
their smoking initiation rate. Cigarillos and some little cigars are sold individually and,
thus, do not carry the Surgeon General's warning which appears on the pack. As a
result, consumers may not be exposed to health messages about tobacco's harms,
further exacerbating misconceptions there are few, if any, associated health
consequences from cigar smoking.
Ordinance No. 1360:
The proposed ordinance would prohibit tobacco retailers, except significant tobacco
retailers for which the principal core business is selling tobacco, to sell any single
cigars, whether or not packaged for individual sale, any number of cigars fewer than the
number contained in the original packaging, and any package of cigars containing fewer
than five cigars.
The proposed ordinance further defines cigar to mean any roll of tobacco wrapped
entirely or in part in tobacco or substance containing tobacco, including products such
as cigarillo, tiparillo, little cigars, blunt or blunt wrap.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no adverse impact to the General Fund other than routine Code Enforcement
time to enforce the ordinance.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council introduce by first reading by title only Ordinance
No. 1360, "AN ORDINANCE OF CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
AMENDING SECTIONS 125.010 AND 125.020 OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL
CODE TO PROHIBIT THE SALE OF SINGLE CIGARS (APPLICANT: CITY OF
BALDWIN PARK)."
ATTACHMENT:
1) Survey Report — City of Baldwin Park
2) Ordinance No. 1360
� f � � o � � w
R,
m
2)
cu
ui
O
U)
0
C)
cu
cn
(n
O
(n
cu
.0
cn
a_ U)
I-- a)
0 U)
U)
a)
cu
> a)
a)
C/)
_0
X
O 0 cu
O 0
E -0
2
-a C:
D
O U
0
as
E
c
IT
C
2 m
O 0
.1
== 0 (3)
co U)
co
(D 2) a)
ca .o T)
C- (n 0-0
m E 0)
0 0 a)
— :3
cn o E
0
O 0 -0
2 O 8
CL
0 Cc m
0 0 a) C: •C 0 0 m
M 0 a)
ai -0 C
0
® a)
0
mc
M O.S 0 0
m
-0 o
0 C:
U) (D a)
C .0
O Ca
2 (D :3
a) > _0
Q C C 0 0 0
O E 0)
a) co
O m ca
Q-
E
o O 0
0- 0 0
:3 0 00
u) Op 0 0 E N
m
0
C: (D C:
0 CL 0
o E
cl, @ co E
0a) >, > Nit
a) n
N oa
E 0 c)
U-
a)
a a) . 0
0 > (n
CL CU -
a) Lo
to o
C)
E 0 0-
0 0-
0mC
En L 0
a) co -0 :3 0 0-
0),r C
C: E
2
- cu -
< 0 00 m U-)
to (n E > Z3 04
0 a) CY) 6n,
-i a)
E
c
a) a) cu
C:
(D
O
U)
0 U E
0) U) C U)
C: a) CU C:
0 o o
E a)
U)
moo) b) a) E
0 2
0 CU m
Ov- CL o 0.2 m
a) cc a) 2
a) E 'U-) E -E
U) u)
::l CL
>
>
U, a) _0 c -0
0 a) M m cu
C:
0
C
U) -a
C: -O
i 2
.0 =: 0
E
E
(D
76 E E
:3 0
0
(A L) L)
a) C:
_0 a)
0 (D
< u) 0
C:
a) Q- a)
a)
0 :F as
.2 70 c cu
C 0 -05
0
(D M
CD-
0 D
E L) L) w
co
a)
-0 0)
0 c a)
a) o 'E
U) - -
Ca CU a)
a)
0
Co 0
E
-r- a:3) (D
.0
IZZ (D 0
> w
O)o
N cu
-C! U)
0 -C a)
'n Cl E
E
a) u)
0 co 'P-
() CU
E --p
O a)
-U) 0
ca 0 (a
o x
a)
0
0 'o
0 U)
cu
U)
-0'- T E
a) a)
u) Z5 (u
0
CL -�; >
CL —
a) -0 0
8)
Cc
n
0 0
D u)
cr vi T 15
m 0
C:
E
.0 a)
0 0
0 u) a) umi
5, U t U)
(D E
2 E
ch CL 0
�: 0 70 U)
0 L)
�c L) r-
M m 0
0
(D
0) (n
'n ca 0
U) 0 a)
x
I
■'N
2 a5
cu m
O E
C: D
cu 07
12 E-
cu
O
.0)
Fj
0 cp
O
-j 0
0
U)
cu
a)
0
0
- . a)
K}
Ca
Cl) a)
6i U)
(A —
O
U
0
Cl)
O
_0
CL
-0 0
CU
0 0 CU
!E >
cu
U 0
OL
L a)
(,
O 0
L)
Ca
a) cn
Q-
ca. ID
0 cu m
a) (D
cu
70
Cc -0
>, a)
_0
E S
-C
0 co 2
C OL
0 a)
= >
LL 0 ca
-0 <
0
a) C6
m a)
.E -2
-0 0)
< ai
C3)
L) CO
0
>
75
4) 0
U- =
a) cu
>
E = >
co U)
CU Co
>
cu
CL
U
CL
(Y)
Lao
O
C\l
U
0
'A
to >
:p
m
CD
70
0
0
0')
m
m
ua
to
691
E
O
0
cu
aD
Ui
LID
0
0 0
CD CD 0 CD
0 co
Q
A
0 0 0
0
0 0
0 ca
0 w LD
't
r14
(D
0 CL
— cn
ui
O
(n
cu
.0
cn
a_ U)
I-- a)
0 U)
U)
a)
cu
> a)
a)
C/)
_0
X
O 0 cu
O 0
E -0
2
-a C:
D
O U
0
as
E
c
IT
C
2 m
O 0
.1
== 0 (3)
co U)
co
(D 2) a)
ca .o T)
C- (n 0-0
m E 0)
0 0 a)
— :3
cn o E
0
O 0 -0
2 O 8
CL
0 Cc m
0 0 a) C: •C 0 0 m
M 0 a)
ai -0 C
0
® a)
0
mc
M O.S 0 0
m
-0 o
0 C:
U) (D a)
C .0
O Ca
2 (D :3
a) > _0
Q C C 0 0 0
O E 0)
a) co
O m ca
Q-
E
o O 0
0- 0 0
:3 0 00
u) Op 0 0 E N
m
0
C: (D C:
0 CL 0
o E
cl, @ co E
0a) >, > Nit
a) n
N oa
E 0 c)
U-
a)
a a) . 0
0 > (n
CL CU -
a) Lo
to o
C)
E 0 0-
0 0-
0mC
En L 0
a) co -0 :3 0 0-
0),r C
C: E
2
- cu -
< 0 00 m U-)
to (n E > Z3 04
0 a) CY) 6n,
-i a)
E
c
a) a) cu
C:
(D
O
U)
0 U E
0) U) C U)
C: a) CU C:
0 o o
E a)
U)
moo) b) a) E
0 2
0 CU m
Ov- CL o 0.2 m
a) cc a) 2
a) E 'U-) E -E
U) u)
::l CL
>
>
U, a) _0 c -0
0 a) M m cu
C:
0
C
U) -a
C: -O
i 2
.0 =: 0
E
E
(D
76 E E
:3 0
0
(A L) L)
a) C:
_0 a)
0 (D
< u) 0
C:
a) Q- a)
a)
0 :F as
.2 70 c cu
C 0 -05
0
(D M
CD-
0 D
E L) L) w
co
a)
-0 0)
0 c a)
a) o 'E
U) - -
Ca CU a)
a)
0
Co 0
E
-r- a:3) (D
.0
IZZ (D 0
> w
O)o
N cu
-C! U)
0 -C a)
'n Cl E
E
a) u)
0 co 'P-
() CU
E --p
O a)
-U) 0
ca 0 (a
o x
a)
0
0 'o
0 U)
cu
U)
-0'- T E
a) a)
u) Z5 (u
0
CL -�; >
CL —
a) -0 0
8)
Cc
n
0 0
D u)
cr vi T 15
m 0
C:
E
.0 a)
0 0
0 u) a) umi
5, U t U)
(D E
2 E
ch CL 0
�: 0 70 U)
0 L)
�c L) r-
M m 0
0
(D
0) (n
'n ca 0
U) 0 a)
x
I
■'N
2 a5
cu m
O E
C: D
cu 07
12 E-
cu
O
.0)
Fj
0 cp
O
-j 0
0
U)
cu
a)
0
0
- . a)
K}
Ca
Cl) a)
6i U)
(A —
O
U
0
Cl)
O
_0
CL
-0 0
CU
0 0 CU
!E >
cu
U 0
OL
L a)
(,
O 0
L)
Ca
a) cn
Q-
ca. ID
0 cu m
a) (D
cu
70
Cc -0
>, a)
_0
E S
-C
0 co 2
C OL
0 a)
= >
LL 0 ca
-0 <
0
a) C6
m a)
.E -2
-0 0)
< ai
C3)
L) CO
0
>
75
4) 0
U- =
a) cu
>
E = >
co U)
CU Co
>
cu
C:
O
C)
Q
O
C:
0
C) 0
a 0
U)
.2-
0
O
LO
0
C,4
E'�
(U
ca
CL 0
C_
mU)
2
0 0
>, 7�5
()
a)
00
O N
cu
0
CL C:
0
U)
2
0.0
00
CL
U
CL
(Y)
Lao
O
C\l
U
0
'A
to >
:p
m
CD
70
0
0
0')
m
m
00
n
to
691
E
O
0
cu
aD
a
U)
LID
0
0 0
CD CD 0 CD
0 co
tD
C:
O
C)
Q
O
C:
0
C) 0
a 0
U)
.2-
0
O
LO
0
C,4
E'�
(U
ca
CL 0
C_
mU)
2
0 0
>, 7�5
()
a)
00
O N
cu
0
CL C:
0
U)
2
0.0
00
CL
CL
(Y)
Lao
O
C\l
U
0
(1)
to >
:p
m
CD
70
0
0')
m
0
691
E
E
0
cu
aD
a
U)
LID
0
Q)
0 0 0
0
0 0
0 ca
0 w LD
't
r14
(D
0 CL
— cn
ui
C:
O
C)
Q
O
C:
0
C) 0
a 0
U)
.2-
0
O
LO
0
C,4
E'�
(U
ca
CL 0
C_
mU)
2
0 0
>, 7�5
()
a)
00
O N
cu
0
CL C:
0
U)
2
0.0
00
CL
CL
(Y)
(.0
O
C\l
0
E
0
:p
0
CD
70
0
0')
m
691
E
E
0
cu
aD
a
U)
0)
0 ca
(D
0 CL
— cn
ui
CL
L
.C-
7!--
co
c
C
cu
m
W,
0
CY)
a)
ca
a)
U)
O c6
Ca
a)
-M
0)
0)
-
0
c',) uc):
U
O
U)
U)
_0
-6
-a
U)
0)
a=
0
w
m
L
U)
a)
U)
a)
W-0
w 0
W
2
0
2
W
T
8
8
8 0
-a
o
o
o
(n C;
-
U)
(n
0. =
0•2)
0
0 0
0
0
0
(D
CC)
0
r--
0)
-q-
0
T U)
V)
N
LO
C:
O
C)
Q
O
C:
0
C) 0
a 0
U)
.2-
0
O
LO
0
C,4
E'�
(U
ca
CL 0
C_
mU)
2
0 0
>, 7�5
()
a)
00
O N
cu
0
CL C:
0
U)
2
0.0
00
w
�.
� • '^ ♦ • �'
WHEREAS, State law explicitly permits cities and counties to enact local
tobacco retail licensing ordinances, and allows for the suspension or revocation of a
local license for a violation of any state tobacco control law (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §
22971.3); and
WHEREAS, California courts in such cases as Cohen v. Board of Supervisors,
40 Cal. 3d 277 (1985), and Bravo Vending v. City of Rancho Mirage, 16 Cal. App. 4th
383 (1993), have affirmed the power of the City of Baldwin Park to regulate business
activity in order to discourage violations of law; and
WHEREAS, despite the State's efforts to limit youth access to tobacco, minors
are still able to access smoking products; and
WHEREAS, research demonstrates local tobacco retail ordinances dramatically
reduce youth access to smoking products; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has a substantial interest in promoting compliance
with Federal, State, and local laws intended to regulate tobacco sales and use, in
discouraging the illegal purchase of tobacco products by minors, in promoting
compliance with laws prohibiting sales of tobacco products to minors and finally, and
most importantly, in protecting children from being lured into illegal activity through the
misconduct of adults; and
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City Council, in enacting this ordinance, to
ensure compliance with the business standards and practices of the City of Baldwin
Park and to encourage responsible tobacco retailing and to discourage violations of
tobacco-related laws, especially those which prohibit or discourage the sale or
distribution of tobacco and nicotine products to minors, but not to expand or reduce
the degree to which the acts regulated by Federal or State law are criminally
proscribed or to alter the penalties provided therein.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARI
NOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Section 125.010 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code (BPMC)
hereby amended • adding the following definitions, in the correct alphabetical order,
read:
"Cigar" means any roll of tobacco wrapped entirely or in part in tobacco or in any
substance containing tobacco, and includes all of the component parts of the Cigar
Ordinance 1360 - Page 2
(including but not limited to tobacco, filters, or wrapping). For the purposes of this
chapter, "Cigar" includes, but is not limited to, tobacco products labeled "cigar,"
�4cigarillo," "tiparillo," "little cigar," "blunt," or "blunt wrap."
"Significant Tobacco Retailer" means any Tobacco Retailer for which the
principal or core business is selling Tobacco Products, Tobacco Paraphernalia, or both,
as evidenced • any • the following: (i) twenty percent (20%) • more floor or display
area is devoted to Tobacco Products, Tobacco Paraphernalia, • both, (ii) sixty-sev-
•- - 67%) • more • the gross sales are derived from Tobacco Products, Tobacco
Paraphernalia, • both, • (iii) fifty percent (50%) • more • completed sales
transactions include Tobacco Products • Tobacco Paraphernalia.
SECTION 2. Section 125.020 of the BPMC is amended by adding a new
subsection (H) to read as follows:
(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, no tobacco retailer shall
sell, offer for sale, or exchange for any form of consideration:
(a) Any single cigar, whether or not packaged for individual sale,
(b) Any number of cigars fewer than the number contained in the
manufacturer's original consumer packaging designed for retail sale to a
consumer or
(c) Any package of cigars containing fewer than five cigars.
(2) This subsection (H) does not apply to the sale or offer for sale of a single
cigar or multiple individual cigars by a significant tobacco retailer.
SECTION 3. This ordinance shall go into affect and be in full force and operation
from and after thirty (30) days after its final reading and adoption.
PASSED AND APPROVED ON THE — day • 2013
I Jyj FAI i
FAV
. if.V11
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY • LOS ANGELES ss:
CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
1, ALEJANDRA AVILA, City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that
the foregoing ordinance was regularly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council on 1 2013. Thereafter, said Ordinance
No. 1360 was duly approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on
• the following vote:
MMANTAF011"01
KK#1 I 104 Is] I I IVA I
FAI 0
r k
il /1/ 414%
BALDVtIIN
P � A - R - K
Im
I
ITEM NO. .......... 0-aza Public Hearinq
;Iiiii���]��i]��]ii�i[l���ill�m:r���y,�1,1!!!I
,III IN I 11111 11; . - A •
This report recommends the City Council approve an update to the City's Housing Element
of the General Plan for Planning Period 2014-2021.
CEQA/NOTICING
The Planning Division has completed an environmental analysis, and prepared an Initial
Study for the proposed project. On the basis of that Initial Study, staff concluded that all
potentially significant effects of the project could be mitigated to a less-than-significant
level, and a Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact has been
prepared. The Planning Commission has recommended the City Council adopt said
document.
A Notice of Public Hearing was posted on September 12, 2013 at City Hall, Esther Snyder
Community Center. A notice of public hearing was also published in the San Gabriel
Valley tribune on September 19, 2013.
_fAT 5[ ISM rel 0
M& el 11 11 4411.
The Housing Element is one of the seven mandatory elements required for the City's
General Plan, and it specifies ways in which housing needs of existing and future resident
populations can be met. State law requires that each city and county update their Housing
Element on a pre-determined cycle; for this cycle Housing Element updates must be
adopted by mid-February 2014. If this adoption deadline is met, the Planning Period for
this cycle extends from adoption to 2021. If adopted after mid-February 2014, the City must
update the Housing Element again in four (4) years.
The Housing Element is comprised of five sections: (1) Needs Assessment; (2) Housing
Constraints; (3) Housing Resources; (4) Review of previous Accomplishments from the
2008-2014 Housing Element; and (5) Housing Plan. This update to the Housing Element
is essentially a modification to the existing 2008-2014 Housing Element, adopted in 2012,
AGP-1 16
October 2, 2013
Page 2
which addresses the California Department of Housing and Community Development
("HCD") comments and concerns and new State legislation related to Housing Elements.
The California Government Code at Section 65583(c)(8) states: "The local government
shall make a diligent effort to achieve public participation of all economic segments of the
community in the development of the housing element." As a result, the City held a public
participation workshop on January 30, 2013 with both the Housing and Planning
Commissions to introduce and discuss the Draft Housing Element. Invitation letters were
sent to agencies and organizations that serve low-income, moderate- income, and special
needs communityins Baldwin Park. Additionally, the public workshop was publicized in the
San Gabriel Valley Tribune. Finally, a public hearing was held by the Planning
Commission wherein the Commission recommended the City Council adopt the proposed
Housing Element.
F-71116JIM-1
(1) Needs Assessment
This section addresses demographic characteristics, employment patterns, and income
levels. These patterns and trends are used to assist in defining the City's housing policies
and programs. Projections are utilized to show how Baldwin Park is expected to change in
the coming years.
(2) Housing Constraints
There are many factors that constrain the provisions of adequate and affordable housing in
a city. This section analyzes the potential and actual constraints including, governmental
and non - governmental, which impact production and maintenance of housing for all
persons regardless of income or disability. If there are constraints that impact the
achievement of the housing goals, the City should address the constraints and where
appropriate remove those constraints which affect the maintenance, improvement, and
development of housing.
(3) Housing Resources
Resources that are available for the development, rehabilitation, and preservation of
housing are analyzed in this section. This includes the availability of land, financial
resources, and administrative resources. This section also includes the City's Regional
Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) which was allocated to the City by the Southern
California Association of Governments (SCAG) in accordance with California State Law.
For the 2014-2021 Planning Period, the City was assigned 557 units over four (4)
economic categories. The table on the next page identifies the number of affordable
housing units by economic category which shall be planned for during the 2014-2021
planning period.
CAAmy\AMY\W0RDXReports\Counci1 Reports\AGPA 16 HE #2.doc
AGP-1 16
October 2, 2013
Pa,qe 3
TABLE#1
CITY'S REGIONAL HOUSING NEEDS ALLOCATIOK
FOR 2014-2021 PLANNING PERIOD
INCOME GROUP
% OF
COUNTY MFI*
NUMBER OF
UNITS
PERCENTAGE OF
TOTAL UNITS
Above-Moderate Income
120%+
242
43.1
Moderate Income
81-120%
90
16.2
Low Income
51-80%
83
15.3
Very Low Income
0-50%
142
253
TOTAL
209(28%)
557
100%
-meciian Famity income
Since the current RHNA projections use January 1, 2014 as the baseline year for the
current 2014-2021 planning period, jurisdictions may count units constructed beginning in
2014 toward the current RHNA. Units built or issued certificates of occupancy prior to 2014
are counted toward the previous RHNA planning period, 2008-2014.
(4) Review of Previous Accomplishments from the 2008-2014 Housing Element
Housing Element Law requires each community assess the achievements under adopted
housing programs as part of the update to their current housing element. While the results
can be qualitative where necessary, the results should be quantified and need to be
compared with what was projected. If there are significant shortfalls between the
projections and actual achievements, the reasons for the discrepancies must be discussed
in this section. The table below demonstrates the progress made during the 2008-2014
period.
TABLE#2
PROGRESS TOWARD 2008-2014
REGIONAL HOUSING NEEDS ALLOCATION
C�Amy\AMYMORD\Reports\Gouncil Reports\AGP-1 16 HE #2.doc
INCOME LEVEL
VERY LOW
LOW
MODERATE
ABOVE
MODERATE
TOTAL
Construction Objectives
Goal
185
115
123
321
Progress
1 1
9
31
168
209(28%)
Owner-Occupied Rehabilitation Objectives
Goal
150
150
Progress
26(17%)
26(17%)
Rental Rehabilitation Objectives
Goal
13
53
66
Progress
16(123%)
16(24%)
At-Risk Preservation Objectives
C�Amy\AMYMORD\Reports\Gouncil Reports\AGP-1 16 HE #2.doc
AGP-1 16
October 2, 2013
Paqe 4
INCOME LEVEL
VERY LOW LOW MODERATE ABOVE TOTAL
MODERATE
Goal 174 174
Progress 174(100%) 174(100%)
The 2008-2014 Housing Element was found to be in compliance with Housing Element
Law by the State in 2012, however, as a result of the economic downturn in recent years,
the City experienced very little residential growth between the years 2006-2012. However,
the City was able to facilitate the development of 41 new affordable housing units through
the use of density bonuses and the construction of second dwelling units.
Although the Cit did not show 100% progress for each objective shown in T able #2, as
/if ILY
long as the Housing Element is found to be in compliance with the State Law, across all of
the mandated requirements, there is no consequence to the City for not constructing the
designated units at their respective income levels.
(5) Housing Plan
The goals and polices contained in the Housing Element address the City's identified
needs and are implemented through housing programs offered through various City
departments including the City's Planning and Housing Divisions. In order for the City to
make adequate provisions for the housing needs of all income levels, the programs
identified in this section shall do the following:
1) Conserve the existing affordable housing stock; and
2) Assist in the development of affordable housing, and
3) Provide adequate sites to achieve a variety and diversity of housing, and
4) Remove governmental constraints as necessary-, and
5) Promote equal housing practices.
The housing programs contained in the Housing Element include current programs which
will address the City's unmet housing needs and respective changes to State Laws.
The City received a letter on April 25, 2013, from HCD indicating that the Draft Housing
Element (for the period 2014-2021), submitted for their review along with revisions, meets
the statutory requirements of State housing element law. (See Attachment "Y). HCD
requires that the City finalize the adoption of this Element.
The City received letters from the following entities listed in the table below relating to the
Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact:
C \Amy\AMY\W0RD\Reports\Cound1 Reports\AGP-1 16 HE 92.doc
AGP-1 16
October 2, 2013
Page 5
"I
FROM
DATE
RECEIVED
SUMMARY
CITY'S RESPONSE
Add language to the Housing
Element update that any
Railroad safety is out of
Public
future housing development
the scope of the Housing
Utilities
June 13, 2013
adjacent to or near the
Element and language
Commission
railroad right-of-way is
was not added.
planned with the safety of the
rail corridor in mind.
Conducted a sacred ed lands file
search and indicated that
Native
there is not a presence of
Receive and filed letter
American
June 14, 2013
Native American traditional
for future use if local
Heritage
cultural place(s) in the
Indian tribes need to be
Commission
immediate project area of
contacted.
potential effect.
Provided information
The City currently
County
regarding sewage service and
provides the Sanitation
Sanitation
requested the opportunity to
District the opportunity to
Districts of
July 1, 2013
review individual
comment on potential
Los Angeles
developments within the City
developments within the
County
to determine if there is
City limits and will
sufficient sewer capacity.
continue to do so.
At the Planning Commission meeting on August 28th, there was no comment on either the
Initial Study or the draft Housing Element. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the
Planning Commission voted 4-0 to recommend the City Council approve the Mitigated
Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact and the updated Housing Element for the
2014-2021 Planning Period.
This report has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney's Office as to legal form
and content.
It is recommended that the City Council open the public hearing, receive any public
comments, and following the public hearing adopt Resolution 2013-034 entitled, "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK APPROVING
C:\Amy\AMY\W0RD\Reports\Couna1 Reports\AGP-1 16 HE #2Aoc
AGP-1 16
October 2, 2013
Paae 6
AN UPDATE TO THE HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE 2014-
2021 PLANNING PERIOD AND ADOPTING THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (APPLICANT: CITY OF BALDWIN
PARK; CASE NO. AGP-1 16)."
ATTACHMENTS
#1, Draft Housing Element
#2, Environmental Information—initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration of
Environmental Impact
#3, Letter of Compliance dated April 25, 2013 from the State Department of Housing
and Community Development.
#4, Comment Letter-. from: 1) California Public Utilities Commission; 211 Native American
Heritage Commission; and 3) Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County
#5, Resolution of Approval 2013-034
REPORT PREPARED BY: Amy L. Harbin, AICP, City Plan k1A'=,3N_
C:\ArnytAMYMORD\Reports\Council Reports\AGP-1 16 HE #Zdoc
J i
1 ' 1 l� ► J
CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
14403 East Pacific Avenue
Baldwin Park, CA 91706
This page intentionally left blank.
Baldwin Park 2014-2021 Housing Eleme
Table of Contents
DM
Community Needs Assessment ..................................................................................................... HE-7
PopulationTrends .................................. ............................................................................ DB'7
Household Characteristics ............................................................................................. B8-lZ
HousingProfile ............................................................................................................. ..... BB-33
Housing Constraints
Governmental Constraints ................................................... ......................................... BE-42
MarketConstraints ........................................................................................................... 8E-66
Environmental Constraints ... . ................. ............. ..................................................... BB-69
Housing Resources .~~~~.~~. —_____—_8E-73
Availability o[ Sites for Housing .................................................... .................. ......... BE-73
Regional Housing Needs Allocation (R8NA) ......................................................... RE-73
Residential Sites Inventory ................................ .......................................................... BE-74
Administrative and FL000cbsRroourceo---------------------..8E-84
OWNIFIRMITE
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan Housing Element
List of Tables
fim
Em
B'I Population Growth: Baldwin Park and Surrounding Cities, l99U-ZOI0 ..... 8E-8
B'Z
Population and Growth l94O'2O35 ............................................................................. BE-8
U'3
Age Distribution .......... ........................................................................................................
BE-9
8-4
Race and Ethnicity -------------------'--_--_----BB'lO
8-S
Household Characteristics ............................................................. ...............................
8E-l3
8'6
Households hvIncome Category ------_—'--'------------'RB'14
H-7
Tenure BvIncome Category hm Household Type ............................................. 'R2-25
E[-8
Employment hv Occupation ..........................................................................................
BG-16
8-9
Median Earnings hm Occupation ..................................................... ...........................
8B-l6
D-IO
Disability 6w Age ............................................................................................................ ...
BE-l8
8-12
Developmentally Disabled Residents hv Age ........................................................
BE-19
8'12
Special Needs Households ........................................... ................................................. B8'ZO
8-13
Housing Unit Growth ...... ................................................................................................
BE-23
H'I4
Housing Unit Types ----- ........................................................................................
BE-Z4
8-15
Tenure and Vacancy ......................... ...............................................................................
HB-2G
H-16
Age nfHousing Stock, 30ll ............................................................................... ...........
BE-Z6
8'17
Overcrowding 6n Tenure ...............................................................................................
BE-27
B-18
Median Home Prices, Z0l1 ............................................................................................
BE-2R
U-19
Rental Unit Rates ........................................................... ................................................ ..8E-29
B-ZO
2OI2 Los Angeles County Fair Market Rents .............................. .........................
8E-29
B'21
Households Experiencing Cost Burden ............................................................... ...
88-3U
8-22
Housing Affordability ......................................................................................................
85-3l
R'23
Assisted Housing ...................................................... .........................................................
HE-33
B'24
Market Value of At-Risk Projects ......... ................................................. ....................
BE-37
8'25
Rent Subsidies Required toPreserve At-Risk Rental Units ............................
RB-37
B'26
Summary of Existing Housing Need ..........................................................................
8E-38
8'27
Housing Assistance Needs of Low- and Moderate-Income Households ....
BE-39
B-28
General Plan Residential Land Use Designations ................................................
R8-44
R-29
Permitted and Conditionally Permitted Uses within Residential Zones ...
HE-46
B-30
Development Standards for Residential Zones ....................................................
8B-47
8-31
Development Standards for Small-Lot Single-Family Developments ........
HE-48
8'32
Development Standards for Mixed-Use Zones .................................................... .8B-50
B'33
Parking Requirements ........ ......................................................................... ..................
BE-5l
B'34
Open Space Requirements ......................................................................... ...................
8E-5Z
B-35
Density Bonus Opportunities .......................................... ............................................
BE-57
R-36
Planning Permit Fees ...... ................................................................................................
BE'59
R-37
Z013 Baldwin Park Impact Fees ....... ..................................................... ...................
RB-6O
R'38
Total Impact Fees (S»»»ple) ......... ........... ................... ................................................
RE-0l
H-39
Development Review Time Frames ...........................................................................
8E'04
8-40
Disposition of Conventional Home Purchase Loan Application for the
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan Housing Element
List QfTables
Table
Em
H-41 Disposition of Government-Assisted Home Purchase Loan Application for the
List of Figures
Figure
Page
8'1 Median Earnings hnAnce/Btbnkjty,3011 ............................... ............................. BE-1l
D-J Baldwin Park Median Age hv icitv2OlO-----._-----BE-ll
H-3 Household Income Distribution, ZU1l ..................................................................... 8E-l4
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan Housing Element
Los Angeles Long Beach Glendale MSA ................................................................ BE-88
B-42
Southern California Notices nf Default ................................... .................................
B8-69
8-43
Baldwin Park 8B0A .........................................................................................................
BE-74
B-44
Summary of Residential Capacity oo Vacant Land .............................................
BE-75
B-45
Summary of Residential Capacity on Underutilized Residential Laod
..... 8E'76
8'46
Mixed-Use Opportunity Areas ......................... ...........................................................
88-77
8-47
Sample History of Lot Consolidations ....................................................... ..............
BE-78
B-48
Sample History of Realistic [aoacity. ............................................. .........................
8E-8l
B'49
Comparison nf Sites Inventory and KDNA ..............................................................
R8-83
B'50
Summary of2OO8'2O14 Quantified Objectives and Progress ........................
BE-89
H-5I
Dousing Program Accomplishments ........................................ ...........................
.... BE-9Z
List of Figures
Figure
Page
8'1 Median Earnings hnAnce/Btbnkjty,3011 ............................... ............................. BE-1l
D-J Baldwin Park Median Age hv icitv2OlO-----._-----BE-ll
H-3 Household Income Distribution, ZU1l ..................................................................... 8E-l4
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan Housing Element
This page intentionally left blank.
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan Housing Element
i i •
The California Legislature identifies the attainment of a decent home and a suitable
living environment for every Californian as the State's major housing goal.
Recognizing the important role of local planning programs in the pursuit of this goal,
the Legislature mandates that all cities and counties prepare a housing element as
part of their comprehensive General Plan.
The Baldwin Park Housing Element identifies the existing and projected need for
housing in the community in terms of affordability, availability, adequacy, and
accessibility. The Element sets forth a strategy to address the City's identified
housing needs, including specific implementing programs and activities.
The Housing Element is one of the seven mandatory elements of the General Plan,
and it specifies ways in which the housing needs of existing and future resident
populations can be met. It must be updated every eight years, consistent with State
Housing Element laws; this Housing Element covers a period extending from
adoption to October 1, 2021.
The Housing Element is comprised of five sections:
■ Needs Assessment
■ Housing Constraints
■ Housing Resources
■ Review of Previous Accomplishments from the 2008 -2014 Housing Element
■ Housing Plan
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -1 2014 -2021 Housing Element
The Element begins witbanovrnipw/o[dbeCitv's housing needs, identified inthe
Needs Assessment. The Housing Constraints Section provides a review of potential
noadcot, governmental, and environmental constraints to meeting the City's
identified housing needs. The Housing Resources section evaluates land,
administrative, and financial resources available to address the City's housing goals.
In the Review of Previous /\rcornp|isbcocnts section, the City identifies the progress
made toward goals established in the prior Housing Element. The Housing Plan
addresses the identified housing needs, and includes a series of housing goals,
policies, and programs.
The California Legislature states that a primary housing goal for the State is
ensuring every resident has a decent home and suitable living environment. Section
65580of the California Government Code describes the goal indetail:
�
The availability of housing is of vital statewide importance, and the early
attainment of decent housing and a suitable living environment for every
Californian, including farm-workers, is a priority ofthe highest order.
=
The early attainment of this goal requires cooperative participation of
government and the private sector in an effort to expand housing
opportunities and accommodate the housing needs of Californians of all
economic levels.
�
The provision of housing affordable to low- and modrraLc'iuroouc
�
Local and state governments have uresponsibility to use the powers vested
in tbcnn to facilitate the improvement and development nf housing to make
adequate provision for housing needs of all economic segments of the
�
The Legislature recognizes that in carrying mut1his responsibility, each local
government also has the responsibility to consider economic, environmental,
and fiscal factors and community goals set forth in the general plan and to
cooperate with other local governments and the state in addressing regional
housing needs.
State law requires housing elements to be updated periodically to reflect
community's changing housing needs, The Government Code also requires that each
draft Housing Element be reviewed by the California Department of Housing and
Community Development and that the Department's findings be incorporated prior
Baldwin Park 2U30 General Plan R8-2 2014-2021 Housing Element
to adoption, or that specified findings be made in response to the Department's
In response to changing State law pertinent to housing elements, this updated
Housing Element addresses new State law Senate Bill 812 (Chapter 507, Statutes of
2010), vvbicb amended Government Code 8ccdoo 65583 to require housing
elements to include analysis of the special housing needs of persons with
developmental disabilities.
Senate Bill 37G (Steinberg, 2O0GA extends the housing element planning period from
five years to eight years in order to link the Regional Transportation Plan (RIP)
process with the Regional Housing Needs Allocation [DBNA] and housing element
process. 0oro a jurisdiction receives its BBNA objectives, it has 18 months to
prepare its housing eleozcot and submit it to the Department of Housing and
Community Development (BCD). The deadline for jurisdictions within the region of
Southern California Associated Governments [3C.4G), vvbicb includes the City of
Baldwin Park, is within 1ZU days nf October lS,20l3. jurisdictions that do not meet
this housing element schedule are penalized and must prepare housing elements
every four years instead (Government Code Section 65588).
The Baldwin Park General Plan consists nf nine elements: Land Use, Urban Design,
Economic Development, Circulation, Housing, Open Space and Conservation, Public
Safety, Noise, and Air Quality. The Housing Element complements other General
Plan elements and is consistent with the policies and proposals yet forth by the
Plan. For example, residential densities established in the Land Use Element are
incorporated within the Housing Blcoomnt and fnon the basis for establishing the
residential rapacity within the City. Environmental constraints identified in the
Safety Element, such as areas of the City in which potential residential development
could be impacted by flood waters, are recognized in the Housing Element.
The City has received grant funding to initiate a new General Plan element related to
fostering healthy and sustainable corornuudv The City will ensure consistency
between the Housing Element and the General Plan, and as new policies are
introduced, the Housing Element will be assessed to ensure continued consistency
with existing elements. As General Plan c\eozeoto are updated and/or added, the
Housing Element will be reviewed to ensure continued consistency vdtbio the
General Plan.
Baldwin Park 28CO General Plan BE-3 ZO14-ZOZl Housing Element
A number of local and regional plans and programs relate to the Housing Element.
Brief descriptions of these plans and programs follow.
State Housing Element law requires the HCD, in consultation with the local regional
planning agency (SCAG) to periodically create a plan that summarizes regional
housing needs for both existing conditions, as well as for an eight -year planning
period. This plan, known as the Regional Housing Needs Assessment, or RHNA,
allocates regional housing needs by income level among member jurisdictions. SCAG
has determined the City's housing needs for the period 2013 -2021 is 557 new
housing units.
The Consolidated Plan is a five -year planning document required of all jurisdictions
receiving federal Housing and Urban Development (HUD) funding. Baldwin Park's
2010 -2014 Consolidated Plan fulfills the City's statutory requirements for the City's
two entitlement programs: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and
HOME Investment Partnership (HOME).
The major purpose of the Consolidated Plan is to encourage jurisdictions to develop
a plan for addressing the needs for low income groups that are the intended
beneficiaries of HUD programs. The Plan is required to describe the jurisdiction's
housing and community development needs, set out a strategy that establishes
priorities, and establish a short -term investment plan that outlines the intended use
of resources. The Housing Element builds upon and is consistent with the City's
Consolidated Plan,
The Zoning Code is the key device for implementing the General Plan. The General
Plan, when adopted in 2002, introduced a new mixed -use (Mixed -Use) category to
allow for integrated retail, office, and residential uses within in the City's downtown
area and selected corridors. To implement the General Plan, the City completed a
comprehensive revision of the Zoning Code in 2012 to include two mixed -use zones
(Mixed -Use 1 and Mixed -Use 2) that provide opportunities for medium- and high -
density residential mixed -use developments, with limited commercial, institutional,
office, and service uses. The updated Zoning Code implements higher densities in
the Mixed -Use areas, up to 30 units per acre. As such, all sites identified in this
Housing Element are determined to be adequate and sufficient sites available to
meet the City's regional housing needs by income level.
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -4 2014 -2021 Housing Element
■ .
The Housing Element must reflect the values and preferences of the residents, and
therefore, citizen participation is an important component of the development of
this Element. The City encourages and solicits the participation of its residents and
other local agencies in the process of identifying housing and community
development needs, and prioritizing expenditure of funds. Section 65583(c)(8) of
the Government Code states that the local government shall make "a diligent effort
to achieve public participation of all economic segments of the community in the
development of the housing element." This process not only includes residents of
the community, but also participation from local agencies and housing groups,
community organizations, and housing sponsors.
All segments of the Baldwin Park community were encouraged to participate in the
preparation of the Housing Element through a combination of general public notices
and direct contacts with organizations serving low - income and special needs
groups. They were invited to participate in a public workshop with the Planning
Commission and members of the Housing Commission on January 30, 2013. To
ensure that the housing concerns of low- and moderate - income and special needs
residents were addressed, individual invitation letters were distributed to agencies
and organizations that serve the low- and moderate- income and special needs
community in Baldwin Park. These agencies were invited to review and comment on
the 2014 -2021 Housing Element and to attend the study session. Included in the
invitations were;
• Baldwin Park Community Center
• Baldwin Park Family Service Center
■ California Family Counseling Network
■ The San Gabriel /Pomona Parents Place
■ The Family Center
■ Children's Bureau (Baldwin Park Office)
■ Housing Rights Center
■ East Valley Community Health Center
■ East San Gabriel Valley Coalition for the Homeless
■ La Puente Valley Mental Health Center
■ Los Angeles County Public Social Services
■ New Hope Christian Counseling Centers
■ Project Sister
■ ABILITY FIRST /Lawrence L. Frank Center
■ Richard D. Davis Foundation /Developmentally Disabled Inc.
■ Esperanza Charities, Inc.
■ Center for Aging Resources Heritage Clinic Pasadena
■ Catholic Charities - San Gabriel Valley Region
• Asian Youth Center
• Baldwin Park (L.A.)Bilingual Seventh Day Adventist Church Food Bank
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -5 2014 -2021 Housing Element
■ SPIRITT Family Services
■ Santa Anita Family Services and Senior Services
■ Serenity Infant Care Homes, Inc.
■ San Gabriel /Pomona Regional Center
■ YWCA San Gabriel Valley
In addition, the City provided a Spanish translator at the study session in case any
members of the public required clarification of information or assistance with
communicating questions and comments.
At the beginning of study session, a brief description of the Housing Element and the
purpose for its update were given. Members of the Planning and Housing
Commissions had questions relating to the types of services offered by the Housing
Authority, including Fair Housing programs, and how those services are advertised
to the community. Comments were also received from the public regarding the
Section 8 Program and the program waiting list. A representative from the Baldwin
Park Housing Authority was available to respond to program- specific questions
from the public and the Commissions. Topics including funding sources and
methods to facilitate the development of affordable housing were also discussed
during the study session. City staff was available to describe various incentives that
the City provides, such as density bonuses, flexible development standards, fee
waivers, and technical assistance, to encourage and facilitate the development of
different housing products for all income levels within the community.
The Draft Housing Element was available for review at City Hall starting January 24,
2013 The public was invited to comment on the Element. In addition, once HCD has
reviewed the Draft Element, public hearings will be held before the Housing
Commission, the Planning Commission, and City Council to review the Final
Element.
i
Data from a variety of resources inform the crafting of the Housing Element. One of
the most cited sources is the 2010 Census; the Census provides consistent
demographic characteristics that are widely accepted. American Community Survey
is a new feature offered by the U.S. Census, and includes one -year, three -year, and
five -year estimates on population and demographic characteristics. Because the
five -year estimates draw from a larger sample size and are therefore more accurate,
where that data are available over other ACS estimates, the five -year estimate is
used in this document. California Department of Finance Population and Housing
estimates also supplement the 2010 Census data. Additional information has been
drawn from the 2005 -2009 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS)
data, which is based on special tabulations for the HUD from sample Census data.
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -6 2014 -2021 Housing Element
The Housing Needs Assessment addresses population characteristics, employment
patterns, income levels, and illustrates bovv Baldwin Park has grown and changed.
This assessment identifies patterns and trends that serve as the basis for defining
the City's housing policies and programs. Projections are provided to show how the
community is expected to change iu the coming years.
The data used in this needs assessment have been collected from a variety of
sources, including the U.S. Census Bureau (2000 and 2010 Census and American
Cornozuobv Survey), California Department of Finance, and 3Q\O` Some
demographic data estimates (such as the American Community Survey) are obovvn
solely as percentages, as the raw numbers may carry a significant margin of error,
especially for smaller geographical areas such as cities. Nonetheless, the
percentages Qinc a general indication of population and employment troods. The
information contained inthe 2005-2009 CHAS for Baldwin Park is based oospecial
tabulations from /\nucricao Community Survey data for ROD. Because of this,
interpretations of CU/\3 data should also focus on proportions and percentages,
rather than oo precise numbers.
As with any other built-out city, Baldwin Park will have to address housing needs
through such tools as infill development, neighborhood revitalization, and planned
density. To clarify the type of housing that will be needed to meet anticipated future
demand, Housing Element |avv rcguiorn an assessment of population and
employment trends. Characteristics such as age, ethnicity, and employment
influence the type and cost of housing needed or in high demand. Tracking
demographic changes helps the City better plan for, respond to, and/or anticipate
changing housing demand.
Since 8a\dvviz Park incorporated in 1956^ there have been two periods of
substantial growth. Between 1960 and l970, the population increased 3gpercent,
to 47,385 residents, due to single-family housing construction. During the 1970 to
2980 period the population grew another 37 percent to 69,330 due to nuu1ti-[acoik/
housing construction and an increase in household size. In 2000, the Census Bureau
indicated that the City had reached apopulatioo of 7S,753. Between 1990 and
2010, Baldwin Park's population increased by9.3 percent, the majority ofwhich
occurred between 1990 and 2000. However, between 2000 and 2010, Baldwin
Park's population had virtually no change, as indicated by the 2010 Census
population oounuerotino of 7S,390 residents. This stagnation in population growth
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-7 2014-2021 Housing Element
closely paralleled the experiences of many surrounding communities in the region.
Most communities in Los Angeles County had either small population declines or
experienced minimal growth during this period. Demographic researchers have
hypothesized that the decline in population growth rates in the region may due to
Statewide simultaneous out - migration, lack of in- migration, and aging. With a high
cost of living and a suffering economy, fewer people are migrating to California, and
more and more people are leaving to live in other states.
Table H -1
Population Growth: Baldwin Park and Surrounding Cities, 1990 -2010
Jurisdiction
1990
2000
2010
% Change
1990 -2010
% Change
2000 -2010
Baldwin Park
69,330
75,753
75,390
9%
0%
Azusa
41,333
44,371
46,361
12%
4%
Covina
43,207
47,144
47,796
11%
1%
EI Monte
106,209
1.16,249
113,475
7%
-2%
Industry
580
1,004
219
-62%
-78%
Irwindale
1,050
1,472
1,422
35%
-3%
La Puente
36,9551
41,009
39,816
8%
-3%
West Covina
96,086
104,893
106,098
10%
1%
Los Angeles County
8,863,1641
9,519,338
9,818,605
11%
3%
Source: U.S. Census 1990, 2000 and 2010
Estimates of future growth indicate a minimal increase in population over the next
25 years. SCAG estimates that the population of Baldwin Park will reach 82,200 by
the year 2035, representing a less than a 10 percent increase over 25 years.
Table H -2
Population and Growth 1940 -2035
Year
Population
Number
% Growth from Previous
Decade
1960
33,951
--
1970
47,285
39%
1980
50,554
7%
1990
69,330
37%
2000
75,753
9%
2010
75,390
0%
2020 (projection)
78,200
4%
2035 (projection)
82,200
5%
Sources: California Department of Finance Historical Populations, U.S. Census 2010; 2012
SCAG RTP Projections
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -8 2014 -2021 Housing Element
a
Population age distribution serves as an important indicator of housing needs, as
housing needs and preferences change as individuals or households grow older.
Young families tend to focus more on cost and the ability to become first -time
homebuyers. Cost and access to services are important to seniors because they may
be on fixed incomes and have mobility limitations. Table H -3 shows the age
distribution of Baldwin Park residents, as reported by the Census between 1990 and
2010.
Table H -3
Age Distribution
Age group
1990
2000
2010
Number
Percent
Number
Percent
Number
Percent
Preschool (0 -4 years)
7,471
11%
7,324
10%
5,905
8%
School Age 5 -17 ears
16,912
24%
19,153
25%
16,666
22%
College Age (18 -24 years)
9,428
14%
9,000
12%
8,849
12%
Youn Adult 25-44 ears
22,626
33%
23,231
31x/0
21,588
29%
Middle Age (45 -64 years)
9,029
13%
12,463
16%
16,323
22%
Senior Adults 65+ ears
3,864
6%
4,666
6%
6,059
8%
Total
69,330
100%
75,837
100%
75,390
100%
Median Age
26.9
30.5
Source: U.S. Census 1990, 2000 and 2010
In 2010, young adults (25 -44 years old) constituted the largest age group, at 29
percent, followed by the middle -age group (45 -64 years old) and school -age
children (5 -17 years old), both at 22 percent. Since 1990, the proportion of
residents within the preschool and young adult age groups has been declining, a
trend seen nationwide.' The middle -age group (45 -64 years old) and seniors (65
years and older), on the other hand, has increased consistently. This trend shows
that the City's residents are becoming older in general, as evidenced by the
increasing median age in the City. An aging population indicates that in the future,
demand will be higher for smaller housing units and housing programs such as
housing repair services for seniors.
-, . rmn TI 1:
Table H -4 shows the racial and ethnic distribution of the population in Baldwin
Park. Over the last decade, Baldwin Park's ethnic composition has been gradually
shifting, reflecting a trend seen throughout California. In 1980, the two most
prevalent groups in the community were Whites (35 percent) and Hispanics (58
percent), but by 2000, the population of Whites had declined to only seven percent,
i Profile of the California Young Population (Age I6 -24). California State Library. Rosa Maria Moller
Ph.D. 2004
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -9 2014 -2021 Housing Element
while the Hispanic po ubadiocreoscdtn 79 percent The Asian population
also experienced a dramatic increase, nearly tripling, from 4 percent to 12 percent
inZ0O0. Since 2O00,the Asian population has continued to gradually increase, while
the White population has continued to decline; however, changes over the post
decade have not been substantial. The proportion of Hispanics in the City had very
little change, increasing only one percent bctvvccu 2000 and ZOlO. The slight
changes in populations correlate to the overall |ovv population growth in the City
and region, which were zero percent and two percent respectively during the last
decade, 2000-2010.
Table H-4
Race and Ethnicity by Person
Racial/Ethnic Group
2000 Population
2010 Population
2000 to 2010
Population Change
Baldwin
Park
Los
Angeles
County
Baldwin
Park
Los
Angeles
County
Baldwin
Park
Los
Angeles
County
Asian/Pacific Islander
12%
12%
14%
14%
2%
2%
Source: U.S. Census 2000 and 2010
Figure B-1 shows the income disparity between ethnic/racial groups iu the City and
County. Asian households earned a median household income of $58,S92 in Baldwin
Park as of 2011, an income 12 percent higher than total households in the City.
White households in Baldwin Park earned incomes that were approximately 18
percent lower than White households countywide. Hispanic and Black households in
Baldwin Park earned more, but were still below the County average income of
$S2,Z80.
Baldwin Park 2UZ0 General Plan 8S'10 ZO14-2O2I Housing Element
Figure H-1
Median Earnings by Race/Ethnicity, 2011
� Los Angeles County M Baldwin Park
Age distribution also varies significantly hvrace and ethnicity (Figure U-Z)' as the
average age of White and Asian residents tends to be older than that of Hispanic and
Black residents.
Figure H-2
Baldwin Park Median Age by Race/Ethnicity, 2010
All
White alone lnot Hispanic/Latino)
mspamic/Launoa|one
Asian alone
Blucx/Amrona|one
Source: U.S. Census 2010
Baldwin Park 20ZO General Plan BE-11 2014-2021 Housing Element
Household type and size, income level, the presence of persons with special needs,
and other household characteristics may affect access to and demand for housing
and housing programs. This section details the various household characteristics in
Baldwin Park.
RRWZI
Household characteristics and types can impact the type of housing needed. For
instance, single-person households often occupy srna]|cr apartment units or
condominiums, such as studio and one-bedroom units. Married couples often prefer
larger single-family homes, particularly if they have children. This underscores the
oocd to provide J diversity of housing opportunities to provide households of
different ages and types the opportunity to live in Baldwin Park The D.S. Census
Bureau defines a household as all of the people who occupy a housing unit. /\
household is different than a housing unit, as housing units are living quarters
(homes, apartments, mobile homes, etc.). A household refers to the group of persons
living ina housing unit.
According to the 2010 Census, the average household size in Baldwin Park is 4.36
people. This represents atvvo percent decrease over the 4.44 average size in ZOOO.
Baldwin Park's average household size is nourb higher than that of Los Angeles
County axa whole, which averaged 2.98 persons per household.
The data in Table 8-5indicate that Baldwin Park appears to beastable, family-
oriented community, with 88 percent of all households classified as families. This
proportion has remained very stable between 2000 and 2010 (89 percent in 2000).
The City has a much higher proportion of family households than the County (08
percent), the State (69 percent), and the nation (66 percent).
Household size and composition are often interrelated. Communities with alarge
proportion of families with children tend to have a large average household size. In
Baldwin 9zdc however, the proportion of families with children has increased
recently, vvhi\c at the same time the average family size decreased slightly since
2000.
Baldwin Park ZO2D General Plan 82-12 20l4-Z02l Housing Element
Table H -5
Household Characteristics
Household Type
2000
2010
Percent Change
Number
Percent
Number
Percent
in Household
Total Households:
16,961
100.0%
17,189
100.0%
1.3%
Families
15,069
88.8%
15,155
88.2%
0.6%
with children
9,481
55.9%
9,845
57:3%
3.8%
with no children
5,588
32.9%
5,310
30.9%
-5.0%
Non - Families
1,892
11.2%
2,034
11.8%
7.5%
Singles
1,379
8.1%
1,474
8.6%
6.9%
Others
513
3.0%
560
3.3%
9.2%
Average Household Size
4.44
4.36
-1.8%
Average Family Size
4.53
4.45
-1.8%
Renter - Occupied
39%
40%
1.3%
Owner - Occupied
61%
60%
-1.5%
Source: U.S. Census 2000 and 2010
Income Profile
Household income is a critical, although not the only, factor affecting housing
opportunity because it determines a household's ability to purchase or rent housing
and balance housing costs with other necessities. Income levels can vary
considerably among households, affecting preferences for tenure, location, and
housing type. While higher - income households have more discretionary income to
spend on housing, low- and moderate- income households have a more limited
choice in the housing they can afford.
The estimated 2011 median household income in Baldwin Park was $49,664,
slightly below the median household income for Los Angeles County ($52,280).
Figure H -3 shows that overall, Baldwin Park has a larger proportion of residents (33
percent) earning less than $35,000 per year. In other income categories, though, the
proportion of City residents earning between $35,000 and $74,999 is slightly higher
than the County average. However, the proportion of residents earning above
$75,000 is substantially lower in the City (27 percent) than in the County (36
percent)
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -13 2014 -2021 Housing Element
$200,000+
$125,000-$199,999
$75,000-$124,999
$50,000-$74,999
$35,000- $49.999
$25,000-$34,999
$15,000-$24,999
$0- 14,999
Figure H -3
Household Income Distribution, 2011
Los Angeles C=ounty N Baldwin Park
0% 5% 100,, 151/0 20% 25 °l
Source: U.S. Census American Community Survey 2011.
For housing planning and funding purposes, HCD uses five income categories to
evaluate housing need based on the Area Median Income (AMI) for each county:
• Extremely Low- Income Households earn between 0 and 30% of AMI
• Very Low - Income Households earn between 31 and 50% of AMI
• Low - Income Households earn between 51 and 80% of AMI
• Moderate - Income Households earn between 81 and 120% of AMI
• Above Moderate - Income Households earn over 120% of AMI
The CHAS special Census tabulations developed for HUD provide a specific
breakdown of household income adjusted for family size. As shown in Table H -6,
moderate- and above moderate - income households comprise the largest share of alt
households in Baldwin Park, and the low- income households comprise the second
largest category. According to the 2005 -2009 CHAS, less than 12 percent of the
City's total households are classified as extremely low income (0 -30 percent of AMI),
almost 20 percent are classified as very low income (31 -50 percent of AMI), and
approximately 23 percent are classified as low income (51 -80 percent AMI).
Table H -6
Households by Income Category
Source: 2005 -2009 HUD CHAS Data Book,
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -14 201.4 -2021 Housing Element
Extremely
Very Low-
Moderate /Above
Low- Income
Income (31-
Lour- Income
Moderate -
Household Type
0 -30%
50% )
(51 -80%
Income (81 %+
Baldwin Park
1.6.8%
19.6%
22.6%
41.0%
Source: 2005 -2009 HUD CHAS Data Book,
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -14 201.4 -2021 Housing Element
Housing tenure refers to whether a unit is owned or rented. Tenure is closely
correlated with income, as those households with lower incomes most usually
cannot afford to buy a home. Consistent with this fact, renters in Baldwin Park
earned lower incomes overall, with about 55 percent earning less than half the
median income for the County. There was a significant difference between renter
and owner households, as the proportion of owners earning less than half the
median income was just under 40 percent. Elderly renters are shown to be in the
most precarious financial situation, with nearly 80 percent earning less than half of
the median income.
Table
Household Type
Extremely Low
Income
(0 -30% AMI)
very Low
Income
(31 -50% AMI)
Low Income
(51 -80% AMI)
Moderate /Above
Moderate - Income
(81% +AMI)
Renter - Occupied Households
Elderly (62+ years)
590/0
19%
15%
7%
Small Families (2 -4 persons)
23%
29%
25%
23%
Large Families (5+ persons)
22%
24%
27%
26%
Others
33%
34%
12%
21%
Total Renters
27%
27%
24%
22%
Owner - Occupied Households
Elderly (62+ years)
27%
19%
17%
36%
Small Families (2 -4 persons)
8%
14%
22%
56%
Large Families (5+ persons)
9%
11%
27%
53%
Others
9%
38%
7%
46%
Total Owners
11%
15%
22%
52%
Total Households
17%
20%
23%
41%
Source: HUD CHAS Data Book, 2005 -2009 (Based on 2005 -2009 American Community Survey Estimates)
• t ! • r' #'
Current and future housing needs in Baldwin Park are impacted by the labor and
employment characteristics of residents. Different occupations often translate into
different wage levels. Wage directly impacts a household's ability to afford certain
types of housing, the ability to rent or own housing, and the ability to adequately
maintain housing.
The 2011 American Community Survey estimates that 31,256 Baldwin Park
residents are employed, representing nearly 60 percent of the City's population over
18 years of age. This number was significantly higher than in 2000, when 26,153
residents reported having jobs. This increase is significant, especially considering
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -15 2014 -2021 Housing Element
that the City's overall population decreased slightly, but may be partly due to the
proportional increase in working age populations (ages 18 -64) which make up more
than 60 percent of the City's population.
Table H -8 shows the types of occupations held by Baldwin Park residents. Between
2000 and 2010, there was an increase in the proportion of residents in service
occupations and a decrease in sales and office jobs. This is an important trend, as
service occupations have typically have significantly lower wage earnings (Table H-
9).
Table H-8
a
Occupation
2000
2010
Employees
% of all jobs
Employees
% of all
jobs
Managerial /Professional
3,936
15%
4,693
15%
Service occupations
4,740
18%
7,801
25%
Sales and office occupations
6,899
26%
7,200
23%
Farming, fishing, forestry
69
0%
404
1%
Construction, maintenance
2,804
11%
3,138
10%
Production /Transportation
7,705
29%
8020
26%
Total
26,153
100%
31,256
100%
Source: U.S. Census 2000 and American Community Survey 2011
Table H -9 shows that the median earnings for Baldwin Park residents were slightly
lower than in the County as a whole in all employment categories.
Table H -9
Median Earnings by Occupation
Occupation
Baldwin Park
Los Angeles
County
Managerial /Professional
$ 36,975
$ 65,568
Service occupations
$ 20,080
$ 23,785
Sales and office occupations
$ 35,951
$ 36,345
Farming, fishing, forestry
$ 15,326
$ 18,283
Construction, extraction
$ 29,463
$ 31,317
Installation, maintenance, repair
$ 36,037
$ 36,184
Production /Transportation
$ 28,511
$ 26,696
Source: American Community Survey 2011
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -16 2014 -2021 Housing Element
Certain groups have more difficulty finding decent, affordable housing due to their
special circumstances. Special circumstances may be related to income earning
potential, family characteristics, the presence of physical or mental disabilities, or
age - related health issues. As a result, certain groups typically earn lower incomes
and have higher rates of overpayment for housing, or overcrowding. A central goal
of the Housing Element is to assist persons with special needs in meeting their
housing needs.
ArAfm
The elderly are a large and rapidly growing segment of the population in Baldwin
Park. Specific housing needs of the elderly include affordable housing, supportive
housing (such as assisted living facilities), and other housing that includes a planned
service component. According to the 2010 Census, eight percent of the population,
or 6,059 persons in Baldwin Park, are over the age of 65, compared to 11 percent in
the County.
Many elderly persons have limited income potential, as they are most often retired
and have fixed incomes (retirement funds and Social Security income). This poses a
special problem with regard to housing affordability. Per CHAS estimates, 1,469
elderly households in Baldwin Park earn low and moderate incomes (less than 80
percent AMI).
t - r
Both mentally and physically disabled residents face housing access and safety
challenges. Disabled residents often need affordable, conveniently located housing
which, where necessary, has been specially adapted for wheelchair accessibility,
along with other physical needs. The living arrangements for persons with
disabilities can depend on the severity of the disability. Many disabled persons live
at home in an independent environment and receive the assistance they need
through the help of other family members. To maintain independent living, disabled
persons may require other kinds of assistance. This can include special housing
design features for the physically disabled and in -home supportive services for
persons with medical conditions.
Disabled people, in many cases, may be of limited incomes, often receiving Social
Security income only, with housing costs taking the majority of their monthly
income. Because people with disabilities spend a higher percentage of income on
housing, overcrowding is frequent as housing expenses are shared with others,
oftentimes live -in caretakers. In addition, adults often have the problems of securing
and paying for childcare. They may have the further burden of obtaining an
education or training for themselves to increase their incomes. In addition, disabled
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -17 2014 -2021 Housing Element
persons may face difficulty finding accessible housing (housing that is made
accessible to people with disabilities through the positioning of appliances and
fixtures, the heights of installations and cabinets, layout of unit to facilitate
wheelchair movement, etc.).
Many Baldwin Park residents have personal disabilities that prevent them from
working, restrict their mobility, or make it difficult to care for themselves. In 2011,
eight percent of the population reported a disability. A significant proportion of the
senior population (42 percent) is disabled.
Table H -10
Disability by Age
Age Group
2011
Total
Persons
Persons
with a
Disability
% of Total
Age Group
Under S
5,183
0
0%
5 -17 Years
16,155
673
4%
18 -64 Years
48,206
3,095
6%
Over 65 Years
6,044
2,509
41.5%
Total
75,588
16,327
8%
Source: 2011 American Community Survey
California State Code Title 24 requires all multiple- family residential developments
of three or more units, and stacked condominium developments of four or more
units, to be accessible to disabled persons. However, because Title 24 regulations
were not in effect at the time that many of the City's housing units were constructed,
it is likely that there exists a shortage of housing units accessible to people with
disabilities. The City's home improvement program provides funding to eligible
residents to assist in the construction of improvements to provide access to housing
for disabled persons. In addition, Baldwin Park does not require special building
codes or onerous project review to improve or convert housing for persons with
disabilities. Both the federal Fair Housing Act and the California Fair Employment
and Housing Act impose an affirmative duty on local governments to make
reasonable accommodations (i.e., modifications or exceptions) in their zoning and
other land -use regulations when such accommodations may be necessary to afford
disabled persons an equal opportunity to use a dwelling. Baldwin Park adopted a
reasonable accommodation ordinance as part of the comprehensive Zoning Code
update in 2012.
According to Section 4512 of the California Welfare and Institutions Code a
"developmental disability" means a disability that originates before an individual
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -18 2014 -2021 Housing Element
attains age 18 years, continues, or can be expected to continue, indefinitely, and
constitutes a substantial disability for that individual, which includes rucota|
retardation, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, and autism, This term also includes disabling
conditions found to be closely related to mental retardation or to require treatment
similar to that required for individuals with mental retardation, but does not include
other handicapping conditions that are solely physical iunature.
Many developmentally disabled persons can live and work independently within a
conventional housing environment. More severely disabled individuals require a
group living environment where super-vision is provided. The most severely affected
individuals may require an institutional environment where medical attention and
physical therapy are provided. Because dcVel8pon8otul disabilities exist before
adulthood, the first issue in supportive housing for the developmentally disabled is
the transition from the person's living situation as a child to an appropriate level of
independence osanadult.
The California Department of Developmental Services (DDS) currently provides
community-based services to approximately 243,000 persons with developmental
disabilities and their families through a statewide system of 21 regional centers,
four developmental centers, and two community-based facilities. The San
Gabriel/Pomona Regional Center is one of 21 regional centers in the State of
California that provides point of entry to services for people with developmental
disabilities. The center is a private, non-profit community agency that contracts with
local businesses to offer a wide range of services to individuals with developmental
disabilities and their families.
Table Q-ll provides information from the San Gabriel/Pomona Regional Center on
the number of developmentally disabled individuals in Baldwin Park As of October
2012, 716 Baldwin Park residents were cnosuroocs of the services provided at the
local Regional Ccnter
Table H-11
Baldwin Park Developmentally Disabled Residents By Age
Age Group
Number of
Individuals
Percent of Total
0-14 Years
243
34%
5-22 Years
115
16%
23-54 Years
267
37%
55-65 Years
60
8%
65+ Years
31
4%
Total Mth DisabiliLy
716
100%
Source: California Department vf Developmental Services, 2Ozz
Note: Information m this table indicates the number vf developmentally disabled
residents /oualdvmo Park receiving assistance from the San Gabriel /Pvmoou
Regional Center
Baldwin Park ZO2U General Plan HE-19 2014-2021 Housing Element
According to the ARC of United States (formerly known as the Association of
Retarded Citizens), the nationally accepted percentage of the population that can be
categorized as developmentally disabled is estimated to be one to three percent.
Several housing types are appropriate for people living ' with a developmental
disability: rent-subsidized homes, licensed and unlicensed single-family homes,
Section 8 vouchers, special programs for bonuc purchase, HUD housing, and
residential care facilities. The design of housing-accessibility modifications, the
proximity to services and transit, and the availability of group living opportunities
represent some of the types of considerations that are important in serving this
need group. /\ majority of the City's affordable housing units are reserved for
seniors and disabled persons. Incorporating barrier-free design in all new
rou|dtauzi\y housing [as required by California and Federal pair Housing laws) is
especially important to provide the widest range of choices for disabled residents,
Special consideration should also be given to the affordability of housing, as people
with disabilities may be living ooa fixed income.
To assist meet the housing needs for persons with developmental disabilities, the
City will implement programs to coordinate housing activities and outreach with the
San Gabriel/Pomona Regional Ceutmraodcncooragcbousiogprovidacstodmsigoate
a portion of new affordable housing developments for persons with disabilities, and
assist interested developers in the pursuit of funding sources designated for persons
with special needs and disabilities.
State law identifies two specific family groups as having special housing needs: large
families/households and families with female heads of households. The reasons for
their special needs status varies and may include lower income status, the presence
of children, and the need for financial assistance, as well as the available of suitably
sized housing.
Table H-12
Special Needs Households
Data Year
Characteristics
Large
Households
Female-Headed
Households
Households with
Children
2010
Total Households
7,162
3,358
2,664
% of all households
42%
20%
16%
Renters
39%
49%
640/(ol
Owners
51%.
36%
Source: V� Census 2010 and American Community Survey 2010
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-20 2014-2021 Housing Element
In general, large households (with five or more members) are identified as a group
with special housing needs based on the limited availability o[ adequately sized,
affordable housing units. Larger oohs are often fairly expensive, As such, large
households are often forced to reside in smaller, less expensive units or double up
with other families or extended family tnsave on housing cost. This can result in
The %OlO Census reported 7,262 large households with five ormore members in
Baldwin Park, of which 61 percent owned a home. These households are usually
families with more than two children or families with extended baruik/ rncnibera
such as in-laws or grandparents living in the same housing unit, According to CHAS
data, 73 percent of large-family owners and 85 percent of large-family renters
experienced one or more housing problems. Housing problems include
overcrowding, cost burden, and substandard conditions.
19MW 0=114
In 2010, 3,358 female-headed households lived in 8aJdvviu Park representing 20
percent of all households. Female-headed households with children made up 16
percent of all households. Single-parent households require special consideration
and assistance because of the greater need for day care, health care, and other
services. Female-headed households with children in particular tend tn have lower
incomes, thus limiting housing availability for this group. In addition, these
households have a greater oncd for accessible daycare and other supportive
services, The City's Housing Authority and Recreation and Community Services
Department provide housing and supportive services that offer support programs to
female-headed households. The Housing Authority provides rent subsidies through
the Section 8 Voucher program, The Recreation and Community Services
Department offers affordable childcare and recreation programs to lovv'iocnrue
families. Additionally, the City supports the Teri G. Muse Family Service Center,
vvbicbisacen1rolfacUityfnznoo'profi1agcnciesofferiogsocia\,bna|Lb,ondbunoao
services to the residents of Baldwin Park. Services include various types of
counseling and health programs for individuals and families. All services are offered
at low oroo cost to participants.
Homelessness continues to be a regional and national issue The City of Baldwin
Park is part nf the county-wide Los Angeles Continuum of Care [LACo[]toprovide
assistance to bornc|eso persons at every level of need and assist in the move from
homelessness to permanent housing. The continuum of care begins with
assessment of the needs of the homeless individual or family. The person/family
may then be referred to permanent housing or to transitional housing where
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-21 2014-2021 Housing Element
supportive services are provided to prepare them for independent living. The goal
of a comprehensive homeless service system is to ensure that homeless individuals
and families move from homelessness to self - sufficiency, permanent housing, and
independent living. The LACoC services and facilities available for the homeless in
Baldwin Park are coordinated by the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority
(LAHSA).
Because of the transient nature of homelessness, gauging an estimate of homeless
persons is difficult. One source of information on homelessness in the City of
Baldwin Park is the 2011 Greater Los Angeles Homeless Count Report. The Greater
Los Angeles Homeless Count is a point -in -time study and demographic survey
conducted by LAHSA every two years, and includes sheltered and unsheltered
homeless individuals and families in the county. The survey identified
approximately 3,918 homeless persons, a 20 percent increase from 2009, in the San
Gabriel Valley (SPA3), which includes the City of Baldwin Park and 30 other cities.
The LAHSA survey does not include City - specific information for Baldwin Park.
However, during the 2010 Census, no homeless persons were counted in Baldwin
Park.
In addition to LAHSA and as part of the Los Angeles Continuum of Care, the East San
Gabriel Valley Coalition for the Homeless (ESGVCH) provides services for the
homeless and those at risk of homelessness in the East San Gabriel Valley, which
includes the City of Baldwin Park. ESGVCH is a non- profit organization that
provides its services to the area's homeless and at -risk populations through a series
of facilities. These facilities include a Homeless Emergency Assistance Center in the
neighboring City of Covina, a Services Access Center housed in the West Covina
Community Services Center, and emergency winter shelters established in local
churches on a rotating basis. In addition, homeless persons in Baldwin Park are
provided with transportation to these facilities from the Family Service Center in
Baldwin Park. The Center provides community resources to individuals who need
social services such as food, transportation, and referrals.
In 2008, the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments commissioned a homeless
strategy report, which included an estimate of local homeless persons by
jurisdiction. The report estimated 361 homeless persons reside in Baldwin Park.
The City of Baldwin Park relies upon the services provided by ESGVCH and LAHSA,
and allocates CDBG funds to financially assist the operations of the ESGVCH, which
works to adequately serve the needs of the local homeless population.
The City of Baldwin Park is an urban community within a metropolitan area. No
farming operations exist in the City. As such, the City has no seasonal housing needs
for crop - related farmworker jobs.
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -22 2014 -2021 Housing Element
This section addresses characteristics of the housing supply in Baldwin Park,
including type, age, condition, costs, and availability.
Baldwin Park is a built -out city and as expected, has experienced only a modest
growth in its housing stock in recent years. The 2000 Census reported 17,179
housing units in Baldwin Park, representing an increase of approximately one
percent since 1990 (Table H -13). Year 2010 estimates show a two percent growth
rate since 2000. Overall, the City has experienced a growth of three percent since
1990. The Ievel of growth in Baldwin Park is similar to that experienced in the
majority of nearby cities and closely paralleled the housing growth of the County of
Los Angeles as a whole.
Table H -13
Housing Unit Growth
jurisdiction
1990
2000
2010
% Change
2000 -2010
% Change
1990 -2010
Baldwin Park
17,179
17,430
17,736
2%
3%
Azusa
13,232
13,013
13,386
3%
1%
Covina
16,110
16,364
16,576
1%
3%
El Monte
27,167
27,758
29,069
5%
7%
Industry
139
124
73
-41%
-47%
Irwindale
282
378
390
3%
38%
La Puente
9,285
9,660
9,761
1%
5%
West Covina
31,112
32,058
32,705
2%
5%
Los Angeles County 1
3,163,343
3,270,9091
3,445,076
S%
9%
Source: U.S. Census 1990, 2000 and 2010
Diversity in the types of housing available within a community promotes equal
housing opportunity for persons of all income levels. A balanced housing stock
allows households of all income levels, age, and size the opportunity to find housing
suited to their needs. In the 1950s, Baldwin Park housing unit mix was
predominantly single - family, but over the years, the community has matured and
the housing stock is gradually becoming more diversified, providing for a wider
range of housing choices. Although much of the multi - family housing growth
occurred during the 1950s, 1960s, and 1980s, it slowed from 1990 on. The table
below summarizes the housing mix in 1990, 2000, and 2010.
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -23 2014 -2021 Housing Element
As shown io the Table 8-14, the majority ofbousinguodsinBadvvoParkcoosistnf
single-family homes, making up 74 percent of the City's housing stock, with multi-
family housing comprising 24 percent and mobile bouocs filling out the remaining
two percent. According to the American Community Survey estimates, the City's
housing stock has grown by three percent since 1990. K4ubi-bznzih/ units increased
by 26 percent since 1990, while the number of single-family units decreased by less
than one percent. The Mobile Homes, Trailers, and Other category ("Other" refers to
cars, campers, oU:] experienced 47 percent reduction since 1990. The reduction
that occurred to this group of housing units is primarily due to the elimination of
two nonconforming mobile home parks within the City. These parks were closed by
the property owners; one was converted to a conforming use and one remains
vacant. Iboro two other existing, nonconforming mobile bocuo parks in the City
containing 56 residential units.
Table H-14
Housing Unit Types
Housing Type
1990
2000
2010
2000-
Percent
Change
in Units
Number
of Units
Percent
of Total
Number
of Units
Percent
of Total
Number
of Units
Percent
of Total
Single-Family
13,154
77%
13,608
78%
13,130
74%
-4%
Multi-Family 2-4 Units
562
3%
601
3%
644
4%
7%
Multi-Family S+ Units
2,766
16%
2,878
17%
3,538
20%
19%
Total Multi-Family
3,328
19%
3,479
20%
4,182
24%
17%
Mobile Homes, Trailer&
697
4%
343
2%
366
2%
6%
Total
0%1
1%1
Source: C& Department vf Finance, z990 and Z000 Z0z0 American Community Survey
Housing tenure refers to whether a unit is owned nr rented. Table 8-15 shows that
the ratio of owners to renters in Baldwin Pack remained steady between 2000 and
2010, with 60 percent of Baldwin Pack residents owning the home in v9birb they
live. This speaks to the stability of the City's residential neighborhoods. The housing
stock was developed with the intention of providing reasonably priced, detached
single-family home ownership opportunities. It remains owner-predominate today,
with only 39 percent of units in Baldwin Park occupied by renters; however, as new
housing in the City is built, the majority of these are renter-occupied units.
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-24 2014-2021 Housing Element
Table H-15
Tenure and Vacancy
Tenure
2000
2010
Percent Change
in Units
Number
Percent of
Total
Number
Percent of Total
Total Housing Units
16,961
100.0%
17,736
100.0%
3.18%
Renter-Occupied
6,612
38.5%
6,836
38.5%
3.39%
Owner Occupied
10,349
60.2%
10,353
58.4%
O04%
Rental Vacancy Rate
1.9%
3.3%
Owner Vacancy Rate
1.2%
1.3%
Source: VI Census zO0O and z0zK
Note: Overall vacancy rates include other vacancies in addition to owner/rental, including seasonal, other, and rented o,
sold but not occupied.
The vacancy rate indicates a relationship between supply and demand. According to
SCAG, a certain level of vacancies in the housing market is desirable. Four percent is
considered to be a healthy vacancy rate - one that permits sufficient choice among a
variety of housing units - o|tboueb a healthy rate can be as |ovv as two percent for
ownership units and as high as five to six percent for rental units.. A limited vacancy
rate is an indication that demand for housing is outpacing supply and usually results
in higher housing costs, reducing housing opportunities for low-income households.
With a housing stock comprised of 39 percent rental units and 58 percent owner
-
occupied units in Baldwin Park, the weighted oodonuon vacancy rate should be
approximately 3.09 percent. Although the vacancy rate increased to 3.08 percent in
2010 from 2.69 percent in Z0O0, the City's overall vacancy rate is still considered
healthy.
The age and condition of Baldwin Park's housing stock is an indicator of potential
rehabilitation needs. Commonly, housing over 30 years of age may need some form
of major rehabilitation, such as a new roof, foundation vvodc plumbing, etc. The
housing stock in the City is aging. The age of the housing stock as defined by the
year the units were built, is sbovvo in Table B-16. As of 2011, approximately 64
percent of all housing units in the City were built prior tol9RO, and are now over 30
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-2S 2014-2021 Housing Element
years old. Only about 26 percent of the units in Baldwin Park were built between
199O and 20ll.
Table H-16
Age of Housing Stock, 2011
Age
Year Built
% of All Housing Units
6 years or less
2005 or later
2%
7-11 years
2000 to 2004
6%
1.2-21 years
1990 to 1999
7%
22-31 years
1980 to 1989
19%
32-51 years
1960 to 1979
23%
S2-71 years
1940 to 1959
32%
72 years or more
1939 or earlier
4%
Source: American Community Survey 2Oo
Most of the housing stook in Baldwin Park remains in good condition. Very bevv
housing units in the City are considered substandard, and the City oc1h/e|v
addresses those that are through code enforcement and housing rehabilitation loans
and grants. Between 2000 and 2012, City building inspectors and code enforcement
officers estimate that approximately 23 units were red-tagged. Red-tagged units
were severely damaged to the extent that the structure was too dangerous to
inhabit. Of these units, approximately 85 percent were demolished, while the other
l5 percent were rehabilitated.
Overcrowding is an indicator of lack of affordable housing. The prevalence of
overcrowding varies significantly by income, type, and size of household. Generally,
very low- and low-income households and large [on)Uias are disproportionately
affected by overcrowding. However, cultural differences also contribute to
overcrowding conditions since some cultures tend to have larger household sizes.
The Census defines overcrowded households as units with more than one person
per room, excluding bathrooms, kitchens, hallways, and porches. Severely
overcrowded households are households with more than 1.5 persons per room.
Overcrowding io Baldwin Park has become a problem over the years. As the number
of residents increases, so does the demand for City services (i.e., schools, police, and
fire). Moreover, overcrowding also presents negative impacts to neighborhoods and
housing, such as an increase io traffic, deterioration of homes and infrastructure,
and increased levels of on-street parking.
Table 8-17displays the prevalence of overcrowding iu Baldwin Park. As indicated
by the 2011 American Community Survey, over 25 percent of households were
overcrowded (4,220 units). The incidence of overcrowding was significantly higher
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-26 2014-2021 Housing Element
in Bak±vvbz Park than in the County (11.9 percent). The percentage of severely
overcrowded households in Baldwin Park was 6.6 percent [1,109 units) in 201I,
which is also higher than that of the County (4.8 percent).
Overcrowding is typically more prevalent among renters than among owners, Over
33 percent of renter households experienced overcrowding in 2011 (2,]05 units),
compared to only 19.5 percent of owner households (1,915 units). Given that
population growth is expected to continue to exceed housing opportunities, the
issue of overcrowded housing will remain pcdioxn1 to Baldwin Park. As such, a
need exists in Baldwin Park for the development of larger units and the
rehabilitation of existing units to accommodate large families.
Table H-17
Overcrowding by Tenure
Source: zVlz American Community Survey
The City has resources in place to address overcrowded conditions. Because most
new developments in Baldwin Park consist of three- and four-bedroom units,
encouraging overall residential development and removing constraints to
development are important goals that will help increase the supply of housing for
large families and bc|p anucUoraic overcrowded conditions. The primary financial
resource available to assist overcrowded households is funding through the City's
Boroo Improvement Residential Program CHIRP). This program can provide
financial assistance for the construction of bedroom additions to eliminate
overcrowding conditions. Information about this resource is available on the City's
vvobsitc and a1 public counters.
The cost of housing in a community is often directly correlated to the number of
housing problems and affordability issues. High housing costs can price low-income
families out of the market, cause extreme cost burdens, or force households into
overcrowded or substandard conditions.
Ownership Housing
The median home price in Baldwin Park in 2011 was $235,750,. This was nearly four
percent lower than the median home price in 2010, revealing a drop in home prices
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-27 2014-2021 Housing Element
Housing
Units
Housing
Units
Renter
Units
Ovrner
Units
Severely Overcrowded (>I.S persons/room)
1,109
6.6%
11.5%
3.3%
Total Overcrowded (>1 persons/room) 1
4,220
25.3%
33.7%,
19.5%
Source: zVlz American Community Survey
The City has resources in place to address overcrowded conditions. Because most
new developments in Baldwin Park consist of three- and four-bedroom units,
encouraging overall residential development and removing constraints to
development are important goals that will help increase the supply of housing for
large families and bc|p anucUoraic overcrowded conditions. The primary financial
resource available to assist overcrowded households is funding through the City's
Boroo Improvement Residential Program CHIRP). This program can provide
financial assistance for the construction of bedroom additions to eliminate
overcrowding conditions. Information about this resource is available on the City's
vvobsitc and a1 public counters.
The cost of housing in a community is often directly correlated to the number of
housing problems and affordability issues. High housing costs can price low-income
families out of the market, cause extreme cost burdens, or force households into
overcrowded or substandard conditions.
Ownership Housing
The median home price in Baldwin Park in 2011 was $235,750,. This was nearly four
percent lower than the median home price in 2010, revealing a drop in home prices
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-27 2014-2021 Housing Element
during that one -year period. Home prices in Baldwin Park, and across the nation,
have decreased dramatically from the heights prior to the sub -prime mortgage
market collapse of 2007. In 2006, the median home sale price in Baldwin Park was
$429,750, almost twice as high as 2011 prices. However, as the nation recovers from
the recession, overall home sale prices throughout Southern California are
anticipated to increase, and will continue to be dramatically higher than in other
parts of the country. In 2011, the median home price for Los Angeles County at large
was higher than in Baldwin Park, at $315,000. However, the median home prices in
Los Angeles County were nearly six percent lower in 2011 than in 2010.
Median Table H-18
- Prices, 2011
County /City /Area
2011
2010
2006
2010-
2011 %
Change
2006-2011%
Change
Baldwin Park
$235,750
$245,000
$429,750
-3.78%
- 45.14%
Azusa
$389,000
$432,500
$429,500
- 10.06%
-9.43%
Covina
$300,000
$320,000
$485,750
-6.25%
- 38.24%
El Monte
$280,500
$305,000
$455,000
-8.03%
- 38.35%
La Puente
$240,000
$255,000
$459,250
-5.88%
- 47.74%
West Covina
$320,000
$350,000
$519,000
-8.57%
- 38.34%
Los Angeles County
$315,000
$335,000
$515,000
-5.97%
- 38.83%
Source: California Home Sale Activity by City Chart, DataQuick, 2006/7 and 2010/11
The National Association of Home Builders (NAHB), together with Wells Fargo,
compiles and publishes a quarterly NAHB /Wells Fargo Housing Opportunity Index
(HOI). The index calculates the percentage of homes (on a scale from 0 to 100) that
were sold during a three -month period that would be affordable to a family earning
the region's median income. The index assumes buyers will finance 90 percent of
the purchase price with a 30 -year fixed -rate mortgage, and takes into account
prevailing interest rates, property taxes, and insurance costs. The Los Angeles -Long
Beach - Glendale metropolitan statistical area has been ranked among the least
affordable metropolitan areas in the country for the past several years (222 out of
226). However, according to the HOI, the percentage of the Los Angeles
metropolitan area population that could afford a median- priced home has steadily
increased in recent years. During the first quarter of 2010, less than 36 percent of
homes sold were affordable to a family earning the local median income. During the
first quarter of 2011, however, 43.1. percent of homes sold were affordable at the
local median income. And, during the first quarter of 2012, the percentage of
affordable homes increased to just under 50 percent.
Rental Housing
Current data on rental housing were compiled from internet rental sources (Table
H -19). The survey indicated that the majority of apartments available are one to
two - bedroom units and that only a small number of single - family homes, generally
three bedrooms, are available for rent. Because four - bedroom apartments are rare,
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -28 2014 -2021 Housing Element
many large families may need to rent single-family home to avoid overcrowded
conditions. As Table 8'2O shows, rental units in the City o[ Baldwin Park fall within
the range of HUD-determined fair market rents for the County of Los Angeles.
Table H-19
Rental Unit Rates
Unit Size
Rental Housing
Median
Three-Bed
Four-Bed
Source: Craigslist.mo,*notioLA.mm,
apartmentHxoterz.com'WestsideRentalxzvm.Search
performed on October l0,z01l
Table H-20
2012 Los Angeles County Fair Market Rents
Efficieng
On -Bed
Two-Bed
Three-Bed
Four-Bed
Source: HUD User 2012
Overpayment and Affordability
State and federal standards specify that households spending more than 30 percent
of gross annual income on housing experience a housing cost burden. Housing cost
burdens occur when housing costs increase faster than household income. When a
household spends more than 30 percent of its income on housing costs, it has less
disposable income for other necessities such as health care. In the event of
unexpected circumstances such as |nos of employment and health problems, lower-
income households with a burdensome housing cost are more likely to become
homeless or double upwith other households. Homeowners with a housing cost
burden may have the option of selling the homes and become renters, although
many owners have limited equity in their homes due to the decline in home prices.
Renters are also vulnerable and subject to constant changes in the housing market.
Table B-Z1 shows the connection between income, household type, and cost burden.
The proportion of households experiencing coot burden declined significantly as
income increased. Overall cost burden was most prevalent among renter
households in all income categories. In particular, extremely low-income large
[azui>n renters []00 percent) and extremely low-income large tuozil« owner
households (89 Pcrreut) had the highest proportion of cost burden compared with
the proportion experiencing cost burden citywide (50percent).
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-29 2014-2021 Housing Element
Table H -21
Households Experiencing Cost Burden
Household Type
Extremely
Low
Income (0-
30 %)
Very Low
Income
(31 -50 %)
Low Income
(51 -80 %)
Moderate/
Above
Moderate
(81 % +)
All Income
Categories
Renter - Occupied Households
Elderly (62+ years)
56%
71%
47%
0%
54%
Large Families (5+ persons)
100%
81%
52%
0%
56%
Total Renters
84%
75%
45%
7 %
55 %
Owner - Occupied Households
Elderly (62+ years)
52%
61%
44%
21%
41%
Large Families (5+ persons)
89%
88%
64%
19%
45%
Total Owners
74%
71%
64%
28%
48%
Total Households
80%
73%
57%
24%
50%
Source: HUD CHAS Data Book, 2005 -2009
Affordability
Affordability is determined by comparing the cost of housing to the income of local
households. The high housing costs in Los Angeles County impact communities far
beyond the affordability problem. The lack of affordable housing contributes to high
levels of housing cost burden, overcrowding, and even homelessness. In assessing
housing affordability, the California Health and Safety Code Section 50052.S
provides the following definition of affordable housing cost based on the area
median income level (AMI) adjusted by family size and income level:
Using these updated affordability thresholds, current housing affordability, at the
County level, can be estimated for the various income groups (Table H -22).
Comparing housing costs and maximum affordable prices for low- income
households shows that low- income households are being priced out of the Los
Angeles County rental and ownership market. Given the median home prices
presented in Table H -18, single - family homeownership is beyond the reach of all
extremely low- and very low - income households; however, lower- income four-
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -30 2014 -2021 Housing Element
Calculation of
Affordable
Housing Cost for
Owner
Calculation of
Affordable Housing
Cost for Renters
Extremely Low Income(0 -30% MFI)
30% of 30% AMI
30% of 30% AMI
Very Low Income (0 -50% MFI)
30% of 50% AMI
30% of 50 % AMI
Lower Income (51 -80% MFI)
30% of 70% AMI
30% of 60 % AMI
Moderate Income (81 -120% MFI)
35% of 110% AMI
30% of 110% AMI
Using these updated affordability thresholds, current housing affordability, at the
County level, can be estimated for the various income groups (Table H -22).
Comparing housing costs and maximum affordable prices for low- income
households shows that low- income households are being priced out of the Los
Angeles County rental and ownership market. Given the median home prices
presented in Table H -18, single - family homeownership is beyond the reach of all
extremely low- and very low - income households; however, lower- income four-
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -30 2014 -2021 Housing Element
person and large family households, and moderate- income households should be
able to afford a median - priced home in Baldwin Park.
Table H -22
Housing Affordability
Income Group
AMI adjusted
by size
Affordable
Payment
Dousing Costs
Maximum
Affordable Price
Renter
Owner
Utilities
Taxes &
Insurance
Home
Rental
Extremely Low (0 -30% MFI)
30 % AMI
One Person
$17,750
$444
$444
$50
$80
$68,802
$394
Small Family
$22,800
$570
$570
$100
$90
$83,330
$470
Four Person Family
$25,300
$633
$633
$125
$95
$90,457
$508
Large Family
$27,350
$684
$684
$150
$100
$95,117
$534
Very Low (30 -50% MFI)
50% AMI
One Person
$29,550
$739
$739
$85
$11S
$118,143
$654
Small Family
$37,950
$949
$949
$125
$130
$152,133
$824
Four Person Family
$42,150
$1,054
$1,054
$175
$140
$162,001
$879
Large Family
$45,550
$1,139
$1,1.39
$200
$145
$174,062
$939
Lower (50 -80% MFI)
60 %AMI
70 %AMI
One Person
$44,325
$41,370
$1,108
$1,034
$100
$1.65
$168,689
$1,008
Small Family
$56,925
$53,130
$1,423
$1,328
$150
$190
$216,714
$1,273
Four Person Family
$67,450
$59,010
$1,686
$1,475
$200
$210
$233,599
$1,486
Large Family
$72,850
$63,770
$1,821
$1,594
$250
$220
$246,537
$1,571
Moderate Income (81 -120%
MFI)
110% AMI
One Person
$49,885
$1,247
$1,455
$100
$215
$249,986
$1,147
Small Family
$64,130
$1,603
$1,870
$150
$260
$320,264
$1,453
Four Person Family
$71,280
$1,7821
$2,079
$200
$280
$350,645
$1,582
Large Family
$77,000
$1,925
$2,246
$250
$300
$371,880
$1,675
Notations:
1. Small Family = 3 persons; Large Families = 5 persons
2. Property taxes and insurance based on averages for the region
3. Calculation of affordable home sales prices based on a down payment of 10 %, annual interest rate of 4.5 %0,
30- year mortgage, and monthly payment 30% of gross household income
4. Based on Los Angele County MFI $64,800 and 2012 HCD State Income Limits
S. Monthly affordable rent based on payments of no more than 30% of household income
In the rental market, lower - income households generally cannot afford the market
rents in Baldwin Park unless they find a modestly priced studio apartment.
Moderate- income households should be able to afford one - bedroom units, and some
two - bedroom units in the City. Large moderate - income households may also be able
to afford three - bedroom units; however, larger units may not be attainable.
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -31 2014 -2021 Housing Element
Furthermore, there is a limited number of housing units in the City that have more
than three bedrooms,
The 8a\dvvu Park Housing Authority (BPRA) is responsible for the administration
of Public Housing and Section 8 Rental Assistance Programs iu the City. The Section
8 Rental Assistance Program provides rental subsidies to low-income families which
spend more than 30 percent of their gross income on housing costs. The program
pays the difference between 30 percent ufthe recipients' monthly income and the
federally approved payment standard. Eligibility for the distribution of Section 8
assistance is determined bythe 8P8/\based on the total annual gross income and
family size, and is limited to D.S. citizens and specified categories of non-citizens
who have eligible immigration status. As of October 2012, 55O 8oldvvio Park
households received rental assistance under the HUD Section 8 program and 2SO
applicants were on the waiting list.
The City of Baldwin Park contracts with the Housing Rights Center OHRCl for the
provision of fair housing services to residents in the community. During the 2011
2012 fiscal year, DRC assisted 158 Baldwin Park residents and investigated 17
allegations of housing discrimination. The top reported discrimination complaints
were based on physical and/or mental disability and familial status. Between 2009
and 2012, HBC received 55 discrimination inquiries resulting in 23 cases [47
percent based on disability and 31 percent bases on familial status). Programs and
services provided by 88C include a landlord/tenant counseling program,
investigation services, outreach and education program, and litigation services.
BRC is instrumental in combating discriminatory housing practices in the City of
Baldwin Park.
State lnvv requires an analysis of existing assisted rental units that are at risk of
conversion to market rate. This includes conversion through termination of a
subsidy contract, mortgage prepayment, or expiring use restrictions, The following
at-risk analysis covers the period of 2013 through 2023.
The City can assist with various funding sources, including HUD funding sources,
affordability agreements, and 3ecbno 8 rental assistance to preserve and increase
the supply of affordable housing in Baldwin Park through the acquisition and/or
rehabilitation ofrzo1cr'occupied units and the rehabilitation of owner-occupied
units. Financial assistance is provided to both non-profit and for-profit housing
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-32 2014-2021 Housing Element
developers. Table H -23 presents the inventory of affordable housing developments
in Baldwin Park. In 2012, nine affordable rental housing projects were located in
Baldwin Park, providing approximately 498 affordable units to lower - income
households. Of these units, 40 percent are reserved for seniors and 60 percent are
reserved for families. The following is a summary of the assisted developments
projects listed in Table H -23.
Table H -23
Assisted Housing
Assisted
Year
Tenant
Affordable
Total
Funding program
Earliest
Developments
Built
Type
Units
Units
Conversion
Date
Clark Terrace
1979
Elderly
77
78
HUD Section 221 (d)(4)
14315 Clark St.
HUD Section 223(a)(7)
6/1/2019
Baldwin Park, CA 91706
HUD Section 8
1/31/13
Foster Avenue
1974
Family
40
40
HUD Section 241 (f)
5/1/2035
13630 Foster Ave.
Baldwin Park, CA 91706
Frazier Park
1982
Family
60
60
HUD Section 221 (d)(4)
5/18/13
3243 Frazier St.
HUD Section 8
Baldwin Park, CA 91706
Ramona Park
1980
Family
49
49
HUD Section 8
11/2/20
13870 Ramona Blvd.
CHFA
Baldwin Park, CA 91706
Robert H. McNeill Manor
1987
Elderly
12
12
Public Housing
Not Applicable
Syracuse Park
1972
Family
36
36
HUD Section 236(j) (1)
1/31/13
12728 Syracuse Park
HUD Section 8
Ave.
Baldwin Park, CA 91706
TELACU Las Palomas
2001
Family
75
75
HUD Section 202
2041
3834 Monterey Ave.
Baldwin Park, CA 91706
TELACU Senior Complex
1991
Elderly
74
74
HUD Section 202
2031.
14442 E. Pacific Ave.
Baldwin Park, CA 91706
Villa Ramona
2004
Elderly
70
71
TCAC
2047
13030 Ramona Blvd.
Family
Baldwin Park, CA 91706
Bella Vita
2009
Family
3
52
Density Bonus
2039
13643 Foster Ave.
Baldwin Park, CA 91706
Vineland /Idaho
2011
Family
1
15
Density Bonus
2041
3346 -3354 Vineland
Ave.
Baldwin Park, 91706
Source: California Housing Partnership Corporation, National Housing Trust, and City of Baldwin Park 2012
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -33 2014 -2021 Housing Element
Clark Terrace: Clark Terrace is a 78 -unit apartment complex owned by Goldrich
and Kest. Built in 1979, the complex is assisted under HUD's Section 221(d)(4)
program, which provides mortgage insurance to private developers to facilitate the
development of rental housing. In 1999, the 20 -year Section 8 contract expired. The
property owner has filed for renewal of the contract yearly since then. The current
Section 8 contract expires January 31, 2013. The project was refinanced with a
223(a)(7) loan; the maturity date for that loan is 2019.
Foster Avenue: Foster Avenue is a 40 -unit apartment complex owned by Foster
Apartments Corporation, a community based organization This project was initially
funded with a HUD Section 2360)(1) loan. In 1995, the original owner, Southern
California Industries, transferred ownership to Foster Apartment Corporation,
which received funding from HUD Section 241(f) to purchase the property. The
project will remain affordable until the year 2035.
Frazier Park: Frazier Park is a 60 -unit apartment complex also owned by Goldrich
and Kest. Built in 1982, the complex is assisted under HUD's Section 221(d)(4)
program, and affordability of the project is governed by the Section 8 Contract. The
Section 8 contract will expire on May 18, 2013 and will require renewal at that
point. According to the management company, it is the owners' intent to retain all
units in this project as affordable housing for the foreseeable future.
Ramona Park: Ramona Park is a 49 -unit apartment complex owned by Goldrich
and Kest. Built in 1980, the complex was financed under HUD's Section 8 New
Construction and the California Housing Finance Agency (CHFA) programs. The
CHFA funding imposes affordability controls on the project until November 2020.
The Section 8 contract is also due to expire November 2020,
Robert H. McNeill Manor: The Baldwin Park Housing Authority (BPHA) owns and
administers Mc Neil Manor, a project -based public housing unit. McNeiI Manor is a
12 -unit low- income senior (62 years or older) housing development.
Syracuse Park: Syracuse Park is a 60 -unit apartment complex owned by Syracuse
Park LDP. Built in 1972, this project was financed by HUD Section 2360)(1)
program, which offers reduced interest loans to developers to construct multi-
family projects. In return for preferential financing, the project is subject to a low -
income restriction, with the option of paying off the Ioan after 20 year and
eliminating the affordability controls. Syracuse Park also received public assistance
with Section 8 contract; however, that contract expired in 1999. The Section 8
contract has been renewed on an annual basis. The current Section 8 contract will
expire January 31, 2013.
TELACU Las Palomas: Built in 2001, this 75 -unit apartment complex is owned by
the East Los Angeles Community Union (TELACU), a non - profit entity. The project
was financed by HUD's Section 202 program, which offers direct loans to agencies
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -34 2014 -2021 Housing Element
that develop housing for elderly and disabled. In return, low - income use restrictions
on the project are secured for the full 40 -year mortgage term due in 2041.
TELACU Senior Complex: This project is a 74 -unit apartment complex also owned
by TELACU and financed by HUD's Section 202 program. Built in 1991, the low -
income use restrictions on the project are secured for the full 40 -year mortgage
term, due in 2031. The 20 -year Section 8 contract expired in November 2011.
Villa Ramona: Built in 2004, this project offers 70 total units of affordable housing,
of which half are reserved for seniors and the remainder are reserved for families.
The developer, Thomas Safran, received tax credits from the State to assist with the
construction costs. At the time of approval, the Baldwin Park Community
Development Commission (now obsolete) approved $1,555,000 in assistance to the
developer, of which $200,000 was utilized for off -site, surrounding neighborhood
improvements. The $200,000 accrues no interest and is due and payable in 2048.
The remaining $1,355,000 matures in 2047 and accrues 3.49 percent simple
interest per annum.
Bella Vita: Built in 2009, this 52 -unit condominium project includes three
affordable units for low- income households. This project was approved with a
density bonus and required a recorded agreement to maintain each of the three low -
income units affordable for 30 years. The City's Housing Authority is responsible for
reviewing proposed owners to determine their eligibility and conducts yearly
evaluations. Each time ownership of an affordable unit changes, the City's Housing
Authority is required to be notified. The 30 -year affordability agreement will expire
in 2039.
Vineland /Idaho: Built in 2011, this project consists of 15 single - family residential
units and includes one affordable unit for a very low - income household. This
project was approved with a density bonus and required a recorded agreement to
maintain the very low- income unit affordable for 30 years. The City's Housing
Authority is responsible for reviewing proposed owners to determine their
eligibility and conducts yearly evaluations. Each time ownership of the affordable
unit changes, the City's Housing Authority is required to be notified. The 30 -year
affordability agreement will expire in 2041.
At -Risk Units
Over the next 10 years (2013 - 2023), four federally assisted developments that
provide 222 affordable units have expiring Section 8 contracts and upcoming loan
maturity dates. These projects - Clark Terrace, Frazier Park, Ramona Park, and
Syracuse Park - are owned by for - profit corporations, and as such are considered at
high risk of conversion. The likelihood of each project not continuing their Section 8
contracts would depend on whether the owners can command higher rents on their
units in the open market than by continuing their Section 8 contract.
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -35 2014 -2021 Housing Element
Preservation and Replacement Options
Preservation ofat-risk projects can be achieved ino variety of ways, with adequate
�
Transfer ofownership to nonprofit developers and housing organizations
�
Providing rental assistance inrenters through other funding sources
~
Purchase affordability covenants
�
Refinance mortgage revenue bonds
AUterozbvch\ units that are converted to market rate may be replaced with new
assisted multi-family units with specified affordability timeframes,
Transfer ofOwnership
Transferring ownership of the affordable units to a nonprofit housing organization
is a viable way to preserve affordable housing for the long term and increase the
number of government resources available to the project. The feasibility of this
option depends upon the willingness of the owner to sell, funding sources available
to buy the property, and the existence of nonprofit organization with sufficient
administrative capacity to manage the property. Additionally, projects in which all
of the units are affordable, rather than just aportion, are more likely tobe feasible
because they can participate in ownership transfers more simply. A list of qualified
agencies that have indicated interest in purchasing projects that are at-risk of
converting to market rate is attached ao Appendix }\.
In Baldwin Park the estimated market value for the 222 affordable units in the at'
risk projects is evaluated in Table H-24; estimated to be approximately $20 million.
Rental Assistance
State, local, or other funding sources can also be used to provide rental subsidies to
maintain the affordability of at-risk projects. These subsidies can be structured to
mirror the Section 8 program, whereby the subsidy covers the cost of the unit above
what is determined to be affordable for the tenant's household income (including a
utility allowance) up to the fair market value of the apartment. Given the mix of unit
sizes of the at-risk developments, the total annual subsidy to maintain the 222 at-
risk units is estimated at over $Z million each year (Table H-25). Finding funding
sources to make this o viable preservation option can 6edifficult,
Purchase Affordability Covenants
Another option to preserve the affordability of at-risk projects is to provide an
incentive package to the owners Lo maintain the projects as low-income housing.
Incentives could include writing down the interest rate on the remaining loan
balance and/or supplementing the Section R subsidy received to market levels. The
feasibility of this option depends on whether the complexes require rehabilitation
or are too highly leveraged, as well as the availability o[funding,
Baldwin Park 2D20 General Plan 8E'35 2014-2UZ1 Housing Element
Table H-24
Market Value of At-Risk Projects
Type of Units
Units at Risk
Fair Market
Rents
Very Low-
Income
(<SO%AMI)
1-bdrm
ISO
2-bdrm
53
3-bdrm
19
Total
222
Annual Operating Costs
($877,500)
Gross Annual Income
$2,681,063
NetAnnual Income
$1,803,563
Market Value
$19,839,197_
1. Median Rent: Studio = $750,1-bcd=$93S,2-bcd= $1,200 3-bcd=$1,6*9 +hod~$1,950
z. Average Size: Studio ~50Osgft, 1-hed~700x@t,Ihcd=900sqft3'bnd=1200 ;gtt,4-bed�
z300sqft
3.S«h vacancy rate and annual operating expenses per square foot ~$5.00
4. Market value = Annual net project income * multiplication factor (ratio of the price of a real estate
investment u, its annual rental income)
5. Multiplication factor for a building /n moderate condition =ll
Table H-25
Rent Subsidies Required to Preserve At-Risk Rental Units
Unit Size
Total
Units
Fair Market
Rents
Very Low-
Income
(<SO%AMI)
Affordable
Monthly
Cost
(30%AMI)
Affordable
Annual Cost
(30% AMI)
Cost of
Utilities
Per Unit
Subsidy
Total
Annual
Subsidy
Total
222
$2,016,606
Source: ovglemgaud,Inc.
Construction of Replacement Units
The construction of new low-income housing can be a means to replace at-risk units,
The cost of developing new housing depends on a variety of factors including
density, size of units, construction quality and type, location, and land cost.
Assuming a development cost of $200,000 for a multi-family rental unit, the cost of
replacing all 222 affordable at-risk units would be approximately $44.4 million.
Baldwin Park ZOZ0 General Plan HE-37 2014-2021 Housing Element
s s VWq
Several factors influence the degree of demand, or need, for housing in Baldwin
Park. The four major needs categories considered in this element include:
• Housing needs resulting from population growth, both in the City and the
surrounding region
• Housing needs resulting from the overcrowding of units
• Housing needs that result when households pay more than they can afford
for housing
• Housing needs of "special needs groups" such as elderly, large families,
female- headed households, households with a disabled person, farm
workers, and the homeless
Table H -26 summarizes the existing housing needs in Baldwin Park.
Table H -26
Summary of Existing Housing Need
Overpaying Households
Special Deeds Groups
Renter
4,565
Elderly Persons
6,044
Owner
6,340
Disabled Persons
6,277
Total
10,905
Large Households
7,162
Extremely Low- Income (0 -30% MFI)
84%
Female Headed Households
3,358
Very Low- Income (31 -50% MFI)
82%
Female Headed Households with Children
2,664
Low - Income (51 -80% MFI)
67%
Developmentally Disabled
716
Overcrowded Households
4,220
Homeless
0
Renter
2,305
Owner
1,915
Affordable Units At -Risk of Conversion
222
Source: 2010 Census, 2005 -2009 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy, 2011 American Community Survey
CHAS data, developed by the Census for HUD provide detailed information on
housing needs (e.g., housing cost burden) by income level for different types of
households in Baldwin Park. The CHAS defines housing problems to include:
• Units with physical defects (lacking complete kitchen or bathroom)
• Overcrowded conditions (housing units with more than one person per
room)
• Housing cost burden, including utilities, exceeding 30 percent of gross
income
• Severe housing cost burden, including utilities, exceeding 50 percent of gross
income
The CHAS data indicate that specific households in Baldwin Park have
disproportionate housing needs. In general, renter - households have a higher level of
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -38 2014 -2021 Housing Element
housing problems (70 percent) compared to owner households (57 percent).
Among the 634 elderly renter - households in the City, 93 percent were at or below
80 percent of Area Median Income. Nearly 53 percent of elderly renters had one or
more housing problems. Large renter families, which were by far the category most
affected by housing problems, constituted about 12 percent of all households in the
City. Approximately 85 percent of large renter families reported having some
housing problems.
Table H -27
Housing Assistance Bleeds of Low- and Moderate- Income Households
Household by Type, Income,
and Housing Problem
Renters
Owners
Total
Households
Elderly
Large
Families
Total
Renters
Elderly
Large
Families
Total
Owners
Extremely Low Income (0 -30%
MFI)
375
460
1755
375
325
1215
2970
with any housing problems
55%
100%
88%
53%
100%
78%
84%
Cost Burden >30%
56%
100%
84%
52%
89%
74%
80%
Cost Burden >50%
37%
82%
75%
28%
88%
60%
69%
Very Low Income (31 -50% MFI)
119
505
1765
270
410
1705
3470
• with any housing problems
71%
100%
90%
63%
99%
74%
82%
• Cost Burden >30%
71%
81%
75%
61%
88%
71%
73%
• Cost Burden >50%
50%
21%
31%
46%
67%
49%
40%
Low Income (50 -80% MFI)
95
565
1530
235
990
2480
4010
• with any housing problems
47%
85%
59%
45%
82%
71%
67%
• Cost Burden >30%
47%
520/6
45%
44%
64%
640/,
57%
• Cost Burden >50%
0%
0%
1%
14%
31%
31%
19%
Total Households
634
2075
6510
1385
3640
11200
17710
% with any housing problems
53%
85%
70%
43%
72%
57%
62%
% Cost Burden >30
54%
56%
55%
41%
45%
48%
50%
% Cost Burden >50 1
32%
23%
29%
19%
27%
24%
26%
Note: Data presented in this table is based on special tabulations from sample Census data. The number of households in each
category usually deviates slightly from the 100% count due to the need to extrapolate sample data out to total households.
Interpretations of this data should focus on the proportion of households in need of assistance rather than on precise numbers.
Source: HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) Databook, 2005 -2009.
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -39 2014 -2021 Housing Element
This page intentionally left blank.
Baldwin Park ZU20 General Plan B8-40 2014-2021 Housing Element
Governmental, market, infrastructure, and environmental factors may constrain the
provision of adequate and affordable housing in a city. State law/ requires that
Housing G1urouotx analyze potential and actual governmental and non-
governmental constraints to the production, maintenance, and improvement of
housing for all persons of all income levels and disabilities. 3bnu|d constraints
preclude the acbirvcrnout of housing goals, State Housing E!eooeo\ law requires
jurisdictions to address and, vvhcro appropriate and legally possible, remove
governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and dovc1oyonaut of
housing. This section addresses these potential constraints that affect the supply of
housing in Baldwin Park.
Government constraints are policies, regulations, processing procedures, and/or
fees n jurisdiction may impose for the maintenance, development and improvement
of housing. Local governments have the inherent power to impose those
restrictions that are reasonably related to the promotion and maintenance of public
health, safety, and general welfare; Lbcsc powers are referred to as police powers.
However, many policies and regulations that are put into place have an unintended
consequence that may indirectly affect local housing development. Restrictions on
property that are too overbearing or too costly may restrict affordable housing
development, as an example, This section reviews governmental constraints in the
City of Baldwin Park that may relate to housing development.
Local government housing regulations are necessary to ensure: (l) that housing is
constructed and maintained in a safe manner, (%) that the density and design of
housing is consistent with community standards, and (3) that adequate
infrastructure to support new housing is provided. Local policies and regulations
can also affect the price and availability of housing and, in particular, the availability
o[ affordable housing. Land use controls, site improvement requirements, fees and
exactions, permit processing procedures, and other factors may constrain the
maintenance, development, and improvement ofhousing.
The City of Baldwin Park has not adopted growth control measures or taken
measures to reduce potential housing development. The City has acted to preserve
existing high-density, multiple-family projects and has provided development
opportunities for a variety o[ housing types,
Consistent with State law (Section 65683), this section addresses five potential
constraints to housing development:
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-41 2014-2021 Housing Element
• Land use controls
• Building codes and their enforcement
• Fees and exactions
• Processing and permit procedures
• Housing for people with disabilities
Land use controls are policies, regulations, plans, and other methods ofregulating
the possible uses and development of property, including such things as zoning,
subdivision regulations, and floodp]ain regulation. The two primary regulatory
documents in Baldwin Park are the General Plan and the Zoning Code (Title XV,
Chapter l53of the Municipal Code).
The General Pb/n, required by Government Code 8ecdnu 65000 et scg, is a
comprehensive, long-range policy document that guides physical development in
Baldwin Park. General Plan law requires seven elements or chapters, which includes
the Housing E|ozucot. Although all of the oic0000tn provide policy guidance no the
built environment, the Laud Use Element has a direct relationship to uses on
property. The Land Use Element provides the long-term vision and direction for
land uses and development through a series of goals, policies, and implementation
measures. The Land Use Element also includes a map with land use designations
that describes the distribution of types, amounts, and location of land uses.
Bddvvo Park's Land Use Element was adopted in 2002 and contains goals and
policies specifically for residential development. The Zoning Code serves to
implement these policies through development standards and zoning districts. In
2012, Baldwin Park completed and adopted a comprehensive update of the Zoning
Code and citywide design guidelines.
According to the Land Use Element, approximately half o[ the land iothe City is
designated for residential use, including mixed-use development. The majority of
adndog housing consists n[lovv deosity, single-family units (averaging close to 7.8
dwelling units per acre). This pattern reflects Baldwin Park's origins anaxuburbao
community, where many subdivisions developed immediately following World War
[lto accommodate a burgeoning middle class and rising incomes.
According to the [i3. Census, between ZO0O and 20l0, the housing stock ioBaldwin
Park increased from 17,430 to 17,736 units, an increase of two percent.
Implementation of the General Plan Land Use Plan allows for devc|npruuot of an
additional 1,4S2 dwelling units beyond the 2010 level, which is an average of fewer
than 73 units per year over a2O-ycarperiod.
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-42 2014-2021 Housing Element
General Plan Land Use Classifications
The [and Use Element provides for three residential land use classifications, with
allowable densities ranging from 87 units per acre in low-density areas to over 30
units per acre in the higher-density ruu)dp|e family designations. In addition, one
mixed-use land use category is intended for development of mix of commercial,
office, and residential uses.
Single-Family Residential (0-8.7du/ac)
This category is established to allow traditional single-family homes, with one
dwelling permitted per legal lot. Residences in this category consist generally of
single-family detached houses with private yards. Permitted density is 0.0 to 8.7
dwelling units per acre. Additional uses considered appropriate within this
category include religious and educational institutions, group bncocs, community
care facilities, and parking lots for adjacent commercial and industrial uses,
provided any such use meets development and use criteria set forth in the City's
zoning regulations. Second units may also bc permitted within this designation zsan
accessory use.
Garden Multi-Family (8.8-12du/oc)
This category provides for moderate density housing either as attached or detached
units at a density range of 8.8 to 22.0 dwelling units per acre. These residences
must include usable private and cnnnouoo open space. Additional uses considered
appropriate within this category include religious and educational institutions,
group homes, community care facilities, and parking lots for adjacent commercial
and industrial uses, provided any such use meets development and use criteria set
forth in the City's zoning regulations, and allows for planned developments and
small-lot single-family developments.
Multi-Family (12.1-20du/ac)
The Multi-Family Residential category allows dwelling unit types similar to Carden
Multi-family, but at higher densities. Dwellings typically consist of apartments and
condominiums built ata density range of 12.1 to 20.0 dwelling units per acre. These
residences must include usable private and common open space. Additional uses
considered appropriate within this category include religious and educational
institutions, group homes, community care facilities, and parking lots for adjacent
commercial and industrial uses, provided any such use meets development and use
criteria set forth io the City's zoning regulations.
Mixed-Use (D-3Odu/ao)
The Mixed-Use category has been established to provide opportunities for mixtures
of commercial, office, and residential uses io the same building, on the same parcel
of land, or side by side within the same area. Allowable uses include those identified
in the Multi-Family Residential and General Conooncrcjo| categories. The General
Commercial category includes opportunities for a broad range of retail, office, and
service-oriented commercial uses. Multi-family residential development isallowed
at densities up to 30 units per acre without a requirement for commercial uses.
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-43 2014-2021 Housing Element
Commercial development is allowed up to an FAR of 1.5 without a requirement for
accompanying residential uses. Commercial uses are also permitted on the ground
floor of an otherwise residential building. If a site in an area designated Mixed -Use
includes both residential and commercial uses, a density incentive of 25 percent
may be granted, permitting an overall FAR of 2.0.
Table H -28
General Plan Residential Land Use Designations
Source: Baldwin Park General Plan, 2002; Baldwin Park Zoning Code, 2012
1 i / '
In 2012, the City of Baldwin Park updated its Zoning and Subdivision Codes, and
prepared citywide design guidelines to complement the zoning regulations. The
revised Zoning Code was designed to be easier to use, consistent with new State
laws, and consistent with the General Plan. In particular, the Zoning Code
introduced two mixed -use zones, described below, as well as small -lot subdivisions
to increase home ownership opportunities.
Development standards for housing are established in the Zoning Code and are not
considered excessive. The following provides a general description of some of the
residential development standards set forth in the Zoning Code.
0 10
MS
The Zoning Code provides for four residential zones and two mixed -use zones.
Low- Density Single - Family Residential Zone (R- 1- 7,500)
The R -1 -7,500 zone provides areas for the development of detached single - family
dwelling units on lots greater than or equal to 7,500 square feet in size. The zone is
intended to protect and stabilize desirable characteristics of single - family
residential areas, including larger lot sizes and separation from incompatible land
uses.
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -44 2014 -2021 Housing Element
Permitted
Consistent
General Plan Designation
Densities
Zoning District
Typical Residential Types
Single- Family Residential
0 -8.7 du /ac
R- 1- 7,500, R -1
Detached single - family dwellings on
individual lots with private yards
Garden Multi - Family
8.8-12 du /ac
R -G
Attached and detached units usable
private and common open space
Multi- Family
12.1 -20 du /ac
R -3
Apartment and condominiums
Mixture of commercial, office, and
Mixed -Use
30 du /ac
MU -1, MU -2
residential uses in the same building, on
the same parcel of land, or side by side
within the same area
Source: Baldwin Park General Plan, 2002; Baldwin Park Zoning Code, 2012
1 i / '
In 2012, the City of Baldwin Park updated its Zoning and Subdivision Codes, and
prepared citywide design guidelines to complement the zoning regulations. The
revised Zoning Code was designed to be easier to use, consistent with new State
laws, and consistent with the General Plan. In particular, the Zoning Code
introduced two mixed -use zones, described below, as well as small -lot subdivisions
to increase home ownership opportunities.
Development standards for housing are established in the Zoning Code and are not
considered excessive. The following provides a general description of some of the
residential development standards set forth in the Zoning Code.
0 10
MS
The Zoning Code provides for four residential zones and two mixed -use zones.
Low- Density Single - Family Residential Zone (R- 1- 7,500)
The R -1 -7,500 zone provides areas for the development of detached single - family
dwelling units on lots greater than or equal to 7,500 square feet in size. The zone is
intended to protect and stabilize desirable characteristics of single - family
residential areas, including larger lot sizes and separation from incompatible land
uses.
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -44 2014 -2021 Housing Element
Single-Family Residential Zone /R-1\
The R-1 zone provides areas for the development of detached single-family dwelling
units. The zone is also intended to protect and stabilize desirable characteristics of
single-family residential areas. The minimum lot size is 5,000 square feet.
Garden Multi-Family Residential Zone (R-G)
The K'G zone provides an environment suitable for both small-lot detached or
attached dwelling units where more than one unit may be built ooalot. The intent
is to promote desirable characteristics for medium-density neighborhoods.
K1axinuuno density is 12.0 units per acre, and allows for plan developments and
small-lots single-family devrloproeots.
High Density Multi-Family Residential Zone (R-3)
The R-3 zone provides opportunities for persons to live higher-density, multiple-
unit developments, such as apartments or condominiums with common open space
and other shared amenities, and allows for planned developments and small-lot
single-family developments.
[Nixed-Use Zone 1(K4U-1)
The MU-1 zone provides opportunities for primarily cororoorcioL office,
institutional, and business uses emphasizing retail, entertainment, and service
activities at grade io addition to medium- and high-density residential uses. Such
development is intended to facilitate an internally oriented group of activities that
are functionally integrated through the relationships between location and types of
uses and structures, the efficient use of land and optimal site planning, and various
design elements. The ooaxirounu residential density is 30 dwelling units per acre'
with a roioicouru lot area of 15,000 square feet.
Mixed-Use Zone 2(KVU-2)
The MU-2 zone provides opportunities for primarily medium- and high-density
residential mixed-use developments, with limited commercial, institutional, office,
and service uses distributed in a manner sensitive in scale and design to the street
environment and adjacent residential areas. Commercial uses are oriented toward
meeting local neighborhood needs. The maximum residential density is 15 dwelling
units per acre, with a coioicouno lot area of 1S,000 square feet. However, lots with a
noioiruuro of 20,000 square feet may be developed up to a density of 30 units per
acre. This zone allows for horizontal and/or vertical ouixed-uso.
An incentive k0.5 increase in FAR) is offered for commercial projects that include a
residential component in Mixed-Use areas.
Permitted Uses within Residential Zones
Detached single-family residential dwelling units are permitted in all residential
zones by right, including K-G, B-3, MU-1, and MU-2. Duplexes and nouiLi'bucoik/
dwelling units are not permitted in R-1-7,500, and B-l. Manufactured housing is
permitted in single-family zones consistent with State law. 01obUr home parks
Baldwin Park 2O20 General Plan BE-45 2014-2021 Housing Element
require a conditional use permit in all residential zones (see Table H -29). Second
dwelling units are allowed as an accessory use in the R -1 zone.
Table H -29
Permitted and Conditionally Permitted Uses within Residential Zones
Notes: P = permitted by right; CUP = conditional use permit; A = accessory use
Source: Baldwin Park Zoning Code, 2012.
The Code allows for Planned Developments (PDs), implemented via an overlay zone.
The PD provides a mechanism to put in place more flexible development regulations
on an individual project basis. Any property owner wishing to use the PD approach
is required to apply for a zone change. The PD provisions do not allow underlying
use regulations or densities to be modified.
Residential neighborhoods in Baldwin Park are very well established, and future
development activity in this fully developed community is expected to occur outside
of the low- density residential neighborhoods. In particular, the City promotes
development in mixed -use areas of downtown. The City's strategy is to intensify and
promote residential opportunities in downtown to leverage access to transportation
and encourage higher - density development in a mixed -use setting.
Residential Development Standards
The development standards summarized in Tables H -30 and H -31 include the most
pertinent development standards of the non - specific plan areas in Baldwin Park.
These regulations can affect the ability of property owners to construct and
maintain housing.
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -46 2014 -2021 Housing Element
P
CUP
A
--
Permitted use
Conditional use permit required
Accessory use
Use not allowed
Land Use
R -1
7,500
R -1
R -G
R -3
MU -1
MU -2
Adult Day Care Facilities
CUP
CUP
CUP
CUP
-
-
Condominiums
-
P
P
P
P
Dwellings, Duplex
-
--
P
P
Dwellings, Multi- Family
--
P
P
P
P
Dwellings, Single- Family
P
P
P
P
-
-
Dwellings, Live -work Units
-
-
P
P
Residential Care Homes (6 or fewer residents)
P
P
P
P
-
Residential Care Facilities (more than 6
residents)
CUP
CUP
CUP
CUP
CUP
CUP
Mobile Homes
P
P
P
P
-
Mobile Home Parks
CUP
CUP
CUP
CUP
-
Second Dwelling Units
-
A I
-
--
-
-
Notes: P = permitted by right; CUP = conditional use permit; A = accessory use
Source: Baldwin Park Zoning Code, 2012.
The Code allows for Planned Developments (PDs), implemented via an overlay zone.
The PD provides a mechanism to put in place more flexible development regulations
on an individual project basis. Any property owner wishing to use the PD approach
is required to apply for a zone change. The PD provisions do not allow underlying
use regulations or densities to be modified.
Residential neighborhoods in Baldwin Park are very well established, and future
development activity in this fully developed community is expected to occur outside
of the low- density residential neighborhoods. In particular, the City promotes
development in mixed -use areas of downtown. The City's strategy is to intensify and
promote residential opportunities in downtown to leverage access to transportation
and encourage higher - density development in a mixed -use setting.
Residential Development Standards
The development standards summarized in Tables H -30 and H -31 include the most
pertinent development standards of the non - specific plan areas in Baldwin Park.
These regulations can affect the ability of property owners to construct and
maintain housing.
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -46 2014 -2021 Housing Element
Table H -30
Development Standards for Residential Zones
Source: Baldwin Park Zoning Code, 2012.
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -47 2014 -2021 Housing Element
R -1-
Specific
Development Standards
7,500
R -1
R -G
R -3
Regulations
Lot Area - Minimum
7,500 sf
5,000 sf
S,000 sf
5,000 sf
153.040 Part 2
Lot Depth - Minimum
50 ft
50 ft
50 ft
50 ft
Lot Width - Minimum
SO ft
SO ft
50 ft
50 ft
Corner lot
55 ft
55 ft
55 ft
SS ft
Lot Coverage - Maximum
40%
45%
SO %
60%
Front Yard Setback - Minimum
General
20 ft
20 ft
15 ft
15 ft
Lot with a side entry garage
15 ft
15 ft
153.130.030
Lot adjacent to R- 1 -7,SOO or R -1
20 ft
20 ft
Side Yard Setback - Minimum
General
5 ft
5 ft
loft
loft
Corner lot
10 ft
loft
15 ft
15 ft
- with a side entry garage
20 ft
20 ft
-
153.130.030
Reversed corner lot
15 ft
15 ft
15 ft
15 ft
- with a side entry garage
20 ft
20 ft
Lot adjacent to R- 1 -7,SOO or R -1
20 ft
20 ft
Rear Yard Setback - Minimum
General
20 ft
20 ft
loft
loft
153.130.030
Lot adjacent to R -1 -7,500 or R -1
-
-
20 ft
20 ft
Open Space Area, Common -
—
250 sf /du
250 sf /du
Minimum
153.040.040
Open Space Area, Private - Minimum
20% of
20% of
200 sf /du
200 sf /du
netlot
netlot
153.040.040
area
area
Density - Maximum
5.8 du /ac
8.7 du /ac
12 du /ac
20 du /ac
Building Height - Maximum
27 ft
27 ft
27 ft
35 ft
153.130.040
Building Length - Maximum
-
125 ft
125 ft
Building Width - Minimum
20 ft
20 ft
-
Distance between Buildings -
Minimum
loft
10 ft
Floor Areas - Minimum
Efficiency
-
500 sf
500 sf
One Bedroom
900 sf
900 sf
700 sf
700 sf
Two Bedrooms
1,050 sf
1,050 sf
900 sf
900 sf
Three Bedrooms
1,200 sf
1,200 sf
1,100 sf
1,100 sf
Each Additional Bedroom
200 sf
200 sf
200 sf
200 sf
Source: Baldwin Park Zoning Code, 2012.
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -47 2014 -2021 Housing Element
Table H -31
Development Standards for Planned Development Overlay Zone
Development Standards
R -1
R -G
R -3
Project Lot Area - Minimum
1.5 acres net
40,000 sf net
30,000 sf net
Project Lot Depth - Minimum
Single- Loaded: 150 ft
Double - Loaded: 200
N/A
N/A
ft
Density- Maximum
8.7 du /ac
12 du /ac
20 du /ac
Individual Lot Area - Minimum
4,000 sf
3,700 sf
3,000 sf
Individual Lot Width - Minimum
Interior Lot
40 ft
38 ft
35 ft
Corner Lot
45 ft
43 ft
40 IT
Individual Lot Depth - Minimum
80 ft
75 ft
70 ft
Front Yard Setback - Minimum
Habitable portion of structure
15 ft
15 ft
15 ft
Garage with roll -up door
18 ft
18 ft
18 ft
Garage without roll -up door
20 ft
20 ft
20 ft
Side Yard Setback - Minimum
Interior Lot
5 ft
5 ft
5 ft
Corner Lot
loft
loft
10 ft
Rear Yard Setback - Minimum
15 ft
15 ft
15 ft
Open Space Area, Private - Minimum
600 sf /du - minimum
300 sf /du - minimum
300 sf /du -
dimension 15 ft
dimension 12 ft
minimum
dimension 10 ft
Open Space Area, Common -
400 sf /du - minimum
300 sf /du - minimum
250 sf /du -
Minimum
dimension 40 ft
dimension 30 ft
minimum
dimension 30 ft
Minimum Floor Areas
One Bedroom
900 sf
900 sf
900 sf
Two Bedrooms
1,250 sf
1,250 sf
1,250 sf
Three Bedrooms
1,400 sf
1,400 sf
1,400 sf
Four Bedrooms
1,600 sf
1,600 sf
1,600 sf
Each Additional Bedroom
200 sf
200 sf
200 sf
Building Width - Minimum
30 ft
20 ft
20 ft
Building Height - Maximum
27 ft
27 ft
27 ft
Public Street Width - Maximum
40 ft curb to curb
40 ft curb to curb
40 ft curb to curb
with60 ft right -of-
with 60 ft right -of-
with 60 ft right -of-
way including
way including
way including
sidewalks and
sidewalks and
sidewalks and
parkway
parkway
parkway
Individual Lot Site Coverage -
50%
60%
65%
Maximum
Guest Parking - Minimum
1.5 spaces /du
1.5 spaces /du
1.5 spaces /du
Source: Baldwin Park Zoning Code, 2012.
The City of Baldwin Park regulates the type, location, density, and scale of
residential development to protect and promote the health, safety, and general
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -48 2014 -2021 Housing Element
welfare of residents, as well as implement the policies of the Coocra/ Plan. The
Zoning Code establishes restrictions on lot size and area, yards and setbacks, lot
coverage, building height, parking, and minimum unit size.
Baldwin Park isa predominantly built-out community, Development iu the City io
recent years has most often been achieved through recycling of existing uses;
therefore, compatibility with surrounding uses is important. These standards in
Baldwin Park are similar tothose established for surrounding communities in the
San Gabriel Valley, and dnnot pose a constraint to residential development. The City
has tailored the standards to allow properties to achieve oouxirnocn permitted
densities vvbi)c retaining neighborhood character and amenities. As demonstrated
in the Housing Resources Section of this Housing Element, all recent developments
surveyed have achieved residential densities that are near or above ooaxicnocn
permitted densities. /\o such, Baldwin Park's cumulative development standards are
not considered o constraint todevelopment
To address the prevailing problem of overcrowding in the City [over a quarter of all
housing units - 25.3 percent - are overcrowded), 8uidvvo Park has adopted
nojuiruono unit sizes in the Zoning Code. The ruioinuunn unit sine requirements are
not a constraint to development, as they are generally lower than unit sizes of
recent developments. Recent developments that included affordable units have also
provided unit sizes in excess of these requirements. In addition, the City has
procedures available, including the Specific Plan and Planned Development Overlay
processes, whereby these requirements could bcmodified.
Table 8-32 identifies development standards applicable to all development in the
mixed-use zones. Certain development standards may be subject to special
conditions. |o the MU-1 zone, on more than Z5 percent of the ground floor istobe
developed with and dedicated to residential uses. Pedestrian access sboU be
incorporated into all development within the MU-1 and MU-2 zones, and parking
betvvcro the sidewalk and buildings is prohibited. In addition, the housing portion
nf horizontal mixed use is not allowed at intersection corners.
Baldwin Park ZO%O General Plan 8E'49 2014-2021 Housing Element
Table H -32
Development Standards for Mixed -Use Zones
Development Standards
MU -1
MU -2
Specific
Regulations
Lot Area - Minimum
15,000 sf
15,000 sf
Lot Depth - Minimum
100 ft
100 ft
Lot Width - Minimum
Soft
40 ft
Lot Coverage - Maximum
70%
60%
Front Yard Depth - Minimum*
Oft
0 ft
153.130.030
Side Yard Width - Minimum
0 ft
loft
153.130.030
Rear Yard Depth - Minimum
10ft
15 ft
153.130.030
Common Open Space Area - Minimum
100 sf /du
100 sf /du
Private Open Space Area - Minimum
36 sf /du
36 sf /du
Density - Maximum
30 du /ac
15 -30 du /ac
Building Height - Maximum
50 ft
35 ft
Building Length - Maximum
125 ft
125 ft
Floor Areas - Minimum
Efficiency
One Bedroom
Two Bedrooms
Three Bedrooms
Each Additional Bedroom
500 sf
700 sf
900 sf
1,100 sf
200 sf
500 sf
700 sf
900 sf
1,100 sf
200 sf
Source: Baldwin Park Zoning Code, 2012.
*Note: Stand -alone residential uses have a minimum front yard depth of 10 feet.
Parking Requirements
City parking standards for residential developments are tailored to the vehicle
ownership patterns associated with different residential uses. However, some
jurisdictions can impose excessive parking requirements, which limit the overall
production of housing. Parking is very expensive to provide and can consume
valuable space that could have been otherwise used for additional housing or
amenities such as common or private open space. jurisdictions may implement
greater parking requirements to avoid parking spillovers in adjacent
neighborhoods. This is a common issue related to denser, multi- family residential
uses that are adjacent to single - family areas.
The Zoning Code requires the provision of parking based on the number of units on
the property. Parking requirements for residential uses are listed in Table H -33. For
single - family detached, duplexes, condominiums, and townhouse developments, the
Zoning Code requires two enclosed parking spaces plus one additional garage or
surface space where a dwelling unit contains five or more bedrooms. Apartment
requirements for parking include one carport space per dwelling unit, plus one
other space per dwelling unit. Senior housing requires only one space per dwelling
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -50 2014 -2021 Housing Element
unit. Guest parking requirements for all residential projects, not including single -
family detached units, require one guest parking space per three dwelling units.
Table H -33
Parking Requirements
Land Use
Minimum Number of Spaces Required
Caretaker Housing
1 space/dwelling
unit
Day Care Facilities
a. Small- Family Day Care Home
a.
No requirement beyond standard single- family use
b. Large - Family Day Care Home
b.
2 spaces for single - family dwelling plus 1 space /employee not
residing in the home plus 1 space for drop -off and pick -up
c. Day Care Facility
c.
1 space /employee plus 1 space /facility vehicle plus 1 space /8
children or adult, if adult day care at facility licensed capacity
Dwelling:
a. Single - family Detached,
a.
2 garage spaces /dwelling unit, plus 1 additional garage or surface
Duplex, Condominium, and
space where dwelling unit contains 5 or more bedrooms
Townhouse
b.
1 carport space /dwelling unit, plus 1 other space /dwelling unit
b. Apartments
c.
1 space /dwelling unit
C. Efficiency Apartments
d.
1 space /dwelling unit
d. Senior Housing
e.
1 enclosed space /dwelling unit
e. Second Units
For
all but single - family detached, Guest Parking shall be provided at 1
space/3
dwellin units
Mobile Home Park 12
s aces mobile home site plus 1 guestspace/5 sites
Source: Baldwin Park Zoning Code, 2012.
Notes: Building area defined as gross usable area
If more than one use is located on a site (mixed -use), the number of required off -
street parking spaces is equal to the sum of the requirements prescribed for each
use. However, the shared use of parking facilities may be permitted where
nonresidential uses that are primarily utilized in the daytime share parking facilities
with a primarily nighttime use and /or primarily Sunday use, and vice versa. These
uses must be located within 300 feet of each other. Shared parking provides
opportunities for mixed -use development to maximize available land, by developing
parking that can be used by both residents and visitors to commercial
establishments, consistent with City standards.
Open Space Requirements
To improve the living environment of residential neighborhoods, communities
typically require housing to have a certain amount of open space, such as yards,
common space, and landscaping. In Baldwin Park, open space is reflected in
setbacks and lot coverage requirements, as well as minimum square footage
requirements per dwelling unit. The Baldwin Park Zoning Code divides open space
into two categories: common open space and private open space. Common open
space area is available for the common use or enjoyment of all persons residing on
the lot upon which such open space is located. Private open space area, other than a
required yard area, consists of that which is immediately adjacent to the dwelling
unit served, and which is available for the exclusive use of the occupants of the
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -51 2014 -2021 Housing Element
dwelling unit. Table H -34 identifies the different open space requirements for
residential and mixed -use zones.
Table H -34
Open Space Requirements
Open Space Area
R 2 -7,500
R -1
R -G
R -3
MU 1
MU-2
Specific
Requirements
Regulations
100 sf per unit
Common - Minimum
-
250
250 sf /du
(Minimum
153.040.040;
sf /du
dimension shall be
153.070.030
20 ft)
20% of
20% of
36 sf per unit
Private - Minimum
net lot
net tot
200
200 sf /du
(Minimum
153.040.040;
sf /du
dimension shall be 6
153.070.030
area
area
ft)
Small -Lot Single - Family
15% of
Developments: Private -
net lot
15% of net
153.040.110;
Minimum
area
lot area
153.040.040
Source: Baldwin Park Zoning Code, 2012.
Site Improvements
Site improvements and property dedications are important components of new
development and contribute to the creation of decent housing. These may include:
■ Reservation of sites for parks, recreation facilities, fire stations, libraries, or
other public uses
Dedication for streets, highways, alleys, access rights, bikeways, walkways,
equestrian trails, rights -of -way for drainage and erosion control facilities,
and other public easements.
Baldwin Park has the authority to impose conditions of approval on a final tract map
or parcel map, requiring the subdivider to dedicate real property for streets, alleys,
drainage, public utility easements and other public easements, as indicated in
Section 152.12 of the Subdivision Code.
The Zoning Code also requires site planning and general development standards for
new residential development, including standards for architectural design, fences
and walls, refuse collection facilities, property maintenance, and street dedications.
The requirements are further articulated in the Zoning Code and citywide design
guidelines.
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -52 2014 -2021 Housing Element
I !ill 1111 1
The Land Use Element and Zoning Code contain the basic standards that allow for
the development of variety of housing types. The ZnojnQ Code development
standards are considered standard for suburban communities in Loo /\uge/os
County and Southern California and do not impede the ability to develop housing at
appropriate densities.
Second Units
Baldwin Park permits the construction of second dwelling units consistent with
State law. The Zoning Code allows for attached or detached second residential units
to be constructed in the B-1, R-C, and 8-3 zones as an accessory use, Additional
conditions are standard and do not impede the creation of second units, including:
• The owner of the property must reside vvbbbo the primary or second
dwelling unit, and may rent, but not sell the second unit.
• Second dwelling units roust be located within the rear 50 percent of the lot,
and should incorporate similar architectural features as the primary
dwelling.
• The second unit must meet all roiuinounn development standards for the
zoning district in vvbicb it is located, including but not limited to height,
setbacks, lot coverage, and distance from animal-keeping areas.
• Each detached second dwelling unit io limited in height to one story. For
second unit attached to the existing single-family unit, the height must not
exceed the height of the existing structure.
• For a detached second unit, the total floor space of the unit must not exceed
1,000 square feet. Fora second unit attached to the existing single-family
dwelling unit, the floor area of the second unit must not exceed 30 percent of
the floor area of the existing unit, provided, however, that a minimum of 400
square feet o[ habitable area shall bepermitted.
• One enclosed parking space is required for the second unit, in addition to any
other parking required for the primary unit.
The Zoning Code defines asecond dwelling unit asao attached or detached dwelling
unit which provides complete, independent living facilities for one or more persons,
including permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation
oo the same parcel asaa existing dwelling unit.
Multi-Family Housing
Multi housing is permitted by right in the R-C and R-3residential zones.
Two-family units kdup)exesl are only permitted io the R-G and R-3residential zones,
and not in the R-1-7,500 and R-1 zones.
Mixed-Use Development
Mixed-use development, specifically the integration of residential and commercial
uses, is a relatively new housing concept in Baldwin Pork The General Plan, when
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-53 2014-2021 Housing Element
adopted ioZ00Z, introduced the new Mixed-Use category allowing for the potential
of integrated retail, office and residential uses in the City's historic downtown area
and along a section of North Maine Avenue.
Complementing the General Plan, the Zoning Code introduces two mixed-use zones
(K4D-I and KYD-2) that provide opportunities for pdonadh/ medium- and high-
density residential mixed-use developments, with limited commercial, institutional,
office, and service uses. The Zoning Code implements higher densities in the Mixed-
Use areas.
Manufactured and Mobile Homes
The Baldwin Park Zoning Code defines a manufactured or mobile home as 3
transportable structure that is built on a pc0000cnt chassis and designed to
function as a dwelling when connected to the required utilities, including plumbing,
heating, air conditioning, and electrical xystcoos. Manufactured housing is permitted
by right ou all residential zoned properties, pursuant to State law. Mobile home
parks developments, (defined as any area or tract of land where two or more lots
are rented or leased, held out for rent or lease to accommodate manufactured
homes or mobile homes) are conditionally permitted in all of the residential zones
except K4U-1 and MO'3.
Residential Care Facilities
Residential care facilities serving six or fewer persons are considered a regular
residential use and are permitted in all residential districts pursuant to State lovv
The Zoning Code, under Section 153220.190, defines residential care homes as
residential homes that provides 24-hour non-medical care for six or fewer persons
lO years of age or older, or emancipated minors, with chronic, life-threatening
illness in need of personal services, protection, supervision, assistance, guidance, or
training essential for sustaining the activities of daily living, or for the protection of
the individual. This classification includes group homes, residential care facilities
for the elderky, adult residential facilities, wards of the juvenile court, and other
facilities licensed by the State ofCalifornia.
The code also defines and conditionally permits residential care facilities, defined to
be those fndldjos that provide 24-hour ono'nnedicz} care for more than 6 persons of
the same service population. Such facilities may provide nursing, dietary and other
personal services, but not surgery or other primary medical treatments that are
customarily provided in convalescent facilities or hospitals. This classification
includes retirement homes.
Furthermore, the Zoning Code also defines an adult care facility as a facility that
provides supervision and non-medical care to more than 6 adults, including elderly
persons, ooa less than 24-bourbasis. Au adult day care home is defined asahome
that provides supervision and non'roodiroi care to 6 or fewer adults, including
elderly persons, io the provider's home ooa less than 24'bourbasis.
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-54 2014-2021 Housing Element
Under the 9cookted and CoodiU000\|v Permitted Uses within Bcsidcuda| Zones
table, Adult Day Care Facilities and Croup 8000us (six or fewer residents) are listed.
Adult Day Care Facilities are conditionally allowed in each residential zone, while a
Croup Boolm, with six or few residents, is permitted by right within each residential
zone. Adult Day Core Facilities are also conditionally allowed in the Commercial
Neighborhood Commercial (C 1), General Commercial (C2), 04irad-Uao l (MU l),
and Mixed-Use 2 (MO 2) zones.
Residential care homes are permitted iu all residential zones, and residential rare
facilities (more than six persons) are cuudidooa}k/ permitted in all residential and
mixed-use zones.
Supportive Housing
In a supportive housing development, housing can be coupled with social services
such as job training, alcohol and drug abuse programs, and case management for
populations in need of assistance, such as the homeless, those suffering from mental
illness or substance abuse problems, and the elderly or medically frail, A supportive
housing development in the form of residential care facility serving six of fewer
persons is treated as o residential use, consistent with State law, but is subject to
development standards for the zoning district in which they are located. Similarly,
supportive housing that functions as an apartment would be treated as such in the
permitting process. Large supportive housing developments that function like an
apartment are processed in the same manner as other types of large multi-family
developments.
Emergency and Transitional Housing
The City's Zoning Code makes generous provisions for housing opportunities for
special needs residents. Emergency shelters and transitional shelters are allowed in
the City based ou the type and character nfdevelopment.
Emergency shelters provide short-term shelter for homeless persons. Transitional
housing provides longer-term housing (up to two years), coupled with supportive
services such as job training and counseling, to individuals and families who are
transihooiugto permanent housing. Siting for emergency and transitional housing
is based on the character of development (residential, commercial, etc.), not the
population these developments serve. Consistent with State |avv small transitional
housing serving six or frvvcr people is considered a regular residential use and
permitted io all zones where residential uses are permitted. Transitional housing
for more than seven people that is operated as a residential rare facility is
conditionally permitted in all residential zones and the C1 and C-Z zones.
Transitional housing that functions as a regular multi-family use (such as
apartments) is permitted where multi-family uses are permitted.
To facilitate the development of emergency housing and comply with State |avv the
City's Zoning Code permits emergency shelters by right in the Industrial-
Commercial
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-55 2014-2021 Housing Element
industrial uses, with the emphasis oouses that provide manufacturing and technical
skills employment. The I-C zone is located along the 1-10 and 1-60S freeways, along
Arrow Highway at the City's northern border, and an area in the eastern part of the
City at Ramona Boulevard. Allowed uses in the l-C zone include offices,
manufacturing, assembly, industrial, storage, fabrication, research, and Loadog
establishments. Areas zoned |-C present opportunities for land recycling and the
establishment ofao emergency shelter.
The l-C zone was created as part of the comprehensive Zoning Code update to
consolidate the prior Commercial- Manufacturing, Office- Industrial, and Industrial-
Commercial zones, and to reflect General Plan land use policy. The consolidation
substantially expanded }-C zoned properties throughout the City, for a total of
approximately 185 acres. The l C zone responds to land use trends and City
objectives to phase out heavy, dirty industrial uses and accommodate lighter
manufacturing uses that include a commercial cuonpnocot. The new focus on
commercial activities within this zone will facilitate access tu commercial services
and goods for residents of any future emergency shelters.
Properties zoned i-C are served by regional transportation options, with ready
access to the loterstatc-10 and nno}or roads such as Ramona Boulevard, as well as
regional bus routes and the dnvvotovvo K4eLroUuk commuter rail station. Realizing
the expense associated with new construction, Baldwin Park identified areas zoned
l-C to have a mix of medium- 10 large-sized buildings that would lend tberuoc|vcs to
reuse as homeless shelters. There are multiple lots that are underutilized,
containing only asmall commercial storefront ouaportion of the lot. Some lots have
a primary use as storage. In addition, the City has identified approximately 16.8
acres of vacant land zoned for |'C development, based on Los /\oOc\es County
Assessor data.
The development and management standards for emergency shelters in the Baldwin
Park Zoning Code were drafted to be consistent with revised State law. Specific
provisions for emergency shelters in Baldwin Park include:
• The emergency shelter may contain a maximum o[30beds;
• One parking space is required for every five beds, in addition to two spaces
for employees;
• Interior oosite waiting and client intake areas must be at least 2OO square
feet. Outdoor onsite waiting areas may be a maximum of 100 square feet, and
must be located within 58 feet o[ the public rigbt-of-vvay;
� 8ositc management is required during hours ofoperation;
�
No more than one emergency shelter is permitted within a radius of 300 feet.
�
Temporary shelter may be provided to residents for no more than six
months;
�
Adequate external lighting shall be provided for security purposes. The
lighting shall be stationary, directed away from adjacent properties and
Ba1dvvbz Park 2020 General Plan 8B'56 2014-202I Housing Element
publicrights- and ufan intensity compatible with the neighborhood;
and.
�
The emergency shelter provider/operator shall have a written management
plan including, as applicable, provisions for staff training, neighborhood
outreach, security, screening of residents to ensure compatibility with
services provided at the facility, and for training, counseling, and treatment
programs for residents. Parking and outdoor facilities shall be designed to
provide security for residents, visitors and employees.
FarnlworherHousng
Only one percent of Baldwin Park residents held "Farming, Forestry, and Fishing"
occupations at the time of enumeration of the 2010 Census. These persons are most
likely employed in plant nurseries, landscaping, or gardening companies. No
agricultural operations occur in Baldwin Park, and the Zoning Code does not permit
any agricultural uses. Thus, the City does not foresee a need to provide tarnovvorker
housing pursuant to the State Employee Housing Act (Section 17000 of the Health
and Safety Code).
Density Bonus
The Baldwin Park Zoning Code establishes housing incentives to assist in the
provision of affordable housing for low- and moderate-income households (see
Table H-35).
Table H-35
Density Bonus Opportunities
Source: Baldwin Park Zoning Code Section 153.040.130; CA Government Code Section 65915
Consistent with State law (California Government Code 05915), developers in
Boldvvbu Park can receive density bonuses of 20 to 35 percent, depending on the
amount and type of affordable housing provided, and "concessions", exceptions
from normally applicable zoning and other development standards.
Developers may seek a waiver or modification of development standards that have
the effect of precluding the construction of a housing development meeting the
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-57 2014-2021 Housing Element
Additional Bonus
for Each 1%
% Target Units
Minimum %
Bonus
Increasein Target
Required for
Group
of Units
Granted
Units
Maximum 35% Bonus
Moderate Income
(Condo or PUD Only)
10%
5%
1%
40%
Senior Citizen
Housing
100%
20%
Development
Source: Baldwin Park Zoning Code Section 153.040.130; CA Government Code Section 65915
Consistent with State law (California Government Code 05915), developers in
Boldvvbu Park can receive density bonuses of 20 to 35 percent, depending on the
amount and type of affordable housing provided, and "concessions", exceptions
from normally applicable zoning and other development standards.
Developers may seek a waiver or modification of development standards that have
the effect of precluding the construction of a housing development meeting the
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-57 2014-2021 Housing Element
density bonus criteria. The developer must show that the waiver or modification is
necessary to make the housing units economically feasible.
State density bonus regulations also include incentives and concessions. A
developer can receive an incentive or concession based on the proportion of
affordable units for target groups. Incentives or concessions may include, but are
not limited to, a reduction in setback and square footage requirements and a
reduction in the ratio of vehicular parking spaces that would otherwise be required
that results in identifiable, financially sufficient, and actual cost reductions.
The City of Baldwin Pack uses the California Building Code, 2010 Edition, as the
basis of its building standards, including rules and standards pertaining to the
construction, alteration, repair, moving, demolition, conversion and maintenance of
all buildings and structures. No restrictions or amendments have been adopted that
would constrain the development of housing. Enforcement of building code
standards does not constrain the production or improvement of housing in Baldwin
Park, but instead serves to maintain the condition of the City's neighborhoods.
7lde 24 of the California Administrative Code mandates uniform energy
conservation standards for new construction. K4ioirnuru energy conservation
standards implemented through Title Z4 and the City's Zoning Code may increase
initial construction costs, but reduce operating expenses and expenditure of natural
resources over the long run.
The City of Baldwin Park charges planning fees to process and review permits for
residential developments, Some Baldwin Park fees were adjusted in 2008 for the
first time in 18 years. These fee increases are reflective of higher costs to complete
administrative review of documents and applications. In order for fee increases and
proposed fees to meet legal standards, those fees cannot exceed the actual cost to
provide the related services (including staff time and overhead). Devised fees in
Baldwin Park are consistent with State law and do not exceed actual costs of
administrative processing. Fees charged in Baldwin Park are, in general, lower than
many surrounding cnooroouitieo in Los Angeles County. /\ survey of neighboring
jurisdictions (Azusa, E| Monte, and West Covina) indicates that permit fees in
Baldwin Park are less than all jurisdictions surveyed (see Table H 36).
The City also charges a limited number nfimpact fees Lo ensure that services and
infrastructure are in place to serve the planned developments (see Table 8-37).
Although impact fees and requirements for offsite improvements add to the cost of
Baldwin Park 3020 General Plan BE-58 ZO14-J02I Housing Element
housing, these fees and requirements are necessary to maintain the quality of life
within a community. Baldwin Park's impact fees include a traffic congestion relief
fee, flood control protection fees, public art fees, park fees, and school fees. Los
Angeles County provides sewer to the City and charges a related sewer connection
fee.
Table H -36
Planning Permit Fees
Permit Type
Baldwin Park Fees
Neighboring
jurisdiction Pees
Administrative Adjustment
$500
N/A
Zone Variance or Conditional Use Permit (CUP)
$1,500
$2,000 to $4,583
Amendment to the Zoning Code or General Plan
$2,900
$4,000 to $15,000
'Lone Change only
$2,400
$4,000 to $5,000
Development Plan
Costs incurred by staff,
$2,500 min. deposit
N/A
Specific Plan
Costs incurred by staff,
$2,500 min. deposit.
$2,000 to $10,000
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) - Modification
$500
$2,144
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) - Renewal
$500
N/A
Design Review Fees
$350 to $3,850
$1,228 to $10,000
Categorical Exemption
$60
$75 to $211
Negative Declaration
$800
$3,877
EIR (Review Only)
$70 /hour
$10,000
EIR (Preparation)
Actual costs incurred
plus 15% of total costs
Actual costs
incurred plus 15%
P
admin fee
Tentative Parcel Map
$3,000
$2,000 to $12,212
Tentative Tract Map
Starts at $3,500
$2,000 to $6,043
Site Plan Review
$2,500
N/A
Parcel Map - Final Map
$3,000 + 75 /parcel
N/A
Tract Map - Final Map
$3,500 + 75 /lot
N/A
Appeals to the Zoning Administrator, Planning
Commission or City Council
$800
$1,200 to $2,666
Building Permit Fees (Single - Family)
$1,156 to $2,465
N/A
Building Permit Fees (Multi- Family)
$1,084 to $2,825
N/A
Source: City of Baldwin Park. City of Azusa, City of El Monte, and City of West Covina, 2012
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -59 2014 -2021 Housing Element
Table H -37
2012 Baldwin Park Impact Fees
Impact Fees
Single Family
Condominium
I Multi - Family
I Mobile )!'come
Flood Control Protection
$0.90 per square foot of roof area, not to exceed $50,000
Fees
Traffic Congestion Relief
$46.63 per unit
Fees
The Parkland Impact Fee or In -Lieu fee is based on the amount of land to
be dedicated that provides three (3) acres of park area for 1,000
Parkland Fees
residents. Park area is based on the number of dwelling units to be
constructed and the density factor of 4.44 persons per dwelling unit
(Chapter 154: Development Fees, of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code).
Parkland fees generally are approximately $6,900 per unit.
Sewer Connection Fee
$4,090 J$3,068
1$2,454
$2,454
School Fee
$3.20 per square feet
Art in Public Places Fee'
One Percent (1 %) of the Total Building Valuation
Source: City of Baldwin Park, 2012; Sewer Fee: Los Angele County Sanitation District, 2012.
Notes: Art in Public Places Fee only applies to residential development projects with more than four (4)
dwelling units, and the fee is based on the amount that is equal to one percent (1 %) of the total building
valuation.
Fees charged in Baldwin Park are comparable to, and even less than, those of
surrounding communities in Los Angeles County. A 2012 National Impact Fee
Survey surveyed 37 California jurisdictions and estimated an average total impact
fee of $31,014 for single family residences and $18,807 for multi- family units within
the state. The same study included two Los Angeles County jurisdictions: Lancaster
and Long Beach. The chart below indicates that Baldwin Park's impact fees are
comparable to, though slightly higher than both of these other cities, due mostly to
the City's parkland fee of approximately $6,900 per unit.
The Quimby Act allows the legislative body of a city or county, by ordinance, to
require the dedication of land, the payment of fees in -lieu of, or a combination of
both, for park and recreational purposes as a condition to the approval for a final
tract map or parcel map.
The Baldwin Park General Plan sets clear goals for the expansion of public parks in
the City. As of 1999, the City had 27 acres of parkland, an estimated 0.4 acres of park
space per 1,000 residents. This is significantly less than established guideline
recommendations of between 2.5 and 3.0 acres of parks per 1,000 residents. While
the park fee is high, Baldwin Park's highly urbanized nature in conjunction with the
limited amount of parkland justifies this impact fee.
In an effort to promote second dwelling units, affordable housing, and senior
housing, the City does have parkland fee exemptions and fee reductions for these
uses. New second dwelling units, on a property with one existing single - family
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -60 2014 -2021 Housing Element
house, only have to pay half of the required in -lieu parkland fees. Residential
development restricted by covenant to occupancy for low- and moderate - income
households and /or senior citizens are exempted from parkland fees. Affordable
housing projects are also exempt from the art in public places fee. Affordable
housing projects in Baldwin Park pay substantially less in impact fees, as indicated
in Table H -38.
Table H -38
Total Impact Fees (Sample)
City
Total Impact Fees
Single Family
Multi- Family
Baldwin Park
$19,236.63
$16,550.63
Baldwin Park - Affordable Housing
$12,336.63
$8,650.63
Lancaster
$13,881
$12,162
Long Beach
$16,817
$10,543
Source: Clancy Mullen, Duncan Associates, 2012 and City of Baldwin Park, 2012
Notes:
1. Impact fees include flood control fee, traffic impact fee, Quimby /parkland fee,
sewer fees, school impact fees, and art in public places fee (residential projects
with 4 or less units, including single family residential units, are exempt from
art in public places fee).
2. Assumes an average unit size of 2,000 square feet for single family units and
an average unit size of 1,500 square feet for multi - family units.
3. Art in public places fee assumes a building valuation of $1 million and a 10 unit
building (Single Family and any projects with 4 or less units exempt)
4. Quimby fee assumptions ($6,900) are drawn from September 1, 2004 Baldwin
Park Staff Report recommending adoption of the Quimby fees and related
calculations.
The development review process is an important tool that helps ensure that new
housing meets all necessary health and safety codes and is supplied with all
necessary utilities and infrastructure. Yet, the development review process can also
constrain opportunities for the development of lower - income housing, particularly
through the indirect cost of time in the process and the direct cost in fees.
The Planning Division, under the Community Development Department, is the lead
agency in processing residential development applications, and as appropriate,
coordinates the processing of these applications with other City departments and
agencies. The City uses various development permits to ensure quality housing
while minimizing the costs associated with lengthy reviews, and provides a
procedural guide to facilitate the submittal process. Such permits include Plan
Review /Design Review, Conditional Use Permit, Variances, and Administrative
Adjustments. The Planning Division also reviews tentative tract and parcel map
applications.
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -61 2014 -2021 Housing Element
The Plan Review/Design Review portion of the development process ismandatory
for all development and subdivision projects, excluding single-family residential
projects that are not a port of subdivision of five or more lots. The intent of Plan
Review/Design Review is to promote and enhance good design and site
relationships in order to provide for more orderly development within the City. It
includes ozvjevv of design, layout, and other features of proposed developments. In
addition, the process aids the developer and/or designer by permitting staff to
identify design and code deficiencies prior to the submittal of more costly
construction drawings required by the Building Division. The process for Plan
Review/Design Review includes the following:
1. Pre-submittal review of conceptual drawings is recommended before an
application is submitted to the Planning Division.
Z. Plan Review/Design Review application is required before review can
begin. Incomplete applications will delay process.
3. Proposal will be reviewed by staff committees with a decision of
approval, approval with conditions, or denial made on the basis of
completeness of the application, conformance with applicable Codes, and
aesthetic considerations,
4. Decision letter will be nnoUed out within 30 days from the day that the
completed application was submitted.
S. Denials can be appealed to Planning Commission, Approved drawings
may proceed &z request any additional approvals or permits, including
plan check with the Building Division.
Conditional use permits (COPs, variances, tentative tract maps, and zoning and
general plan amendments requirements all require Planning Commission
recommendations or approvals, These requirements are similar to those of the
ruagozih7 of California cities. Development permits such as tentative tract maps and
zoning and general plan arunodrneots require City Council approval, following a
Planning Commission recommendation. The process for Planning Commission
and/or City Council approval includes the following process:
l. The Planning Commission and City Council typically conduct public
hearings twice a month. Applications must be submitted approximately
45to6O days before the scheduled Planning Commission public hearing.
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-62 2014-2021 Housing Element
Specific submittal deadline dates are available iothe Planning Division
2. When an application is received, it is date-stamped and checked for
completeness within 30 days. If the permit required a Plan
Review/Design Review permit, required components for cozop}otoocxs
should be provided at that time.
3. Coordination reports are prepared and a copy of the plans and/or
elevations is forwarded to the appropriate City departments and non-City
agencies for review and comment.
4. After submittal, the permit application is considered by the Planning
Division and other departments. All agency concerns regarding the
application are discussed as well as necessary design changes,
recommended conditions of approval, and environmental findings,
5 When the Planning Division determines that Negative Declaration or an
Environmental Impact Report is required, the appropriate process must
be completed prior to scheduling the item for public hearings.
fi Prior Lo the Planning Commission meeting, Notices of Hearing are mailed
to all property owners within three hundred foot radius nf the property.
Prior to the cncctioO, notices are posted on-site, at City Hall, and at the
Baldwin Park Community Center. Concerned residents may contact the
Planning Division and submit written conu0000ts regarding the
application. They may also formally address the Planning Commission at
the Public Hearing regarding the proposal.
7. Staff prepares a report for each item oo the Commission agenda. At their
meeting, the members of the Planning Commission review/ staff
recommendations, public testimony and the applicant's presentation. The
Commission either approves or denies the permit.
8. Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting are prepared for public
9. The Commission's decision is final unless appealed. The owner/applicant
or any concerned person may file an appeal of the Commission action
with the City Clerk for hearing hv the City Council. Any such appeal must
be filed within ten calendar days of the Cnoonoinoioo action; the appeal
process begins at City Clerk and must be accompanied by the appeal fee.
10. If required, the permit is osnnUn scheduled for Council action after the
C000rub;siou meeting. The City Clerk prepares the Council agenda and
may be contacted regarding the scheduling of agenda items.
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-63 2014-2021 Housing Element
a TMAMMINT"WE
From submittal to Planning Commission hearing, a subdivision request (tract map
or parcel map) takes on average 4 to 6 weeks (see Table H -39). Other entitlements
required for the project are processed concurrently with the subdivision request. A
project that requires a variance, zone change, or general plan amendment adds
approximately 8 to 10 weeks to the process. Additionally, building permits generally
take 6 to 8 weeks to process. Processing times may be substantially longer if an
environmental impact report (EIR) is required for a project.
Table H -39
Development Review Time Frames
Application
Estimated Processing Time
Plan Review /Design Review
30 days
Conditional Use Permit
6 -8 weeks
Planning Commission Review
6 -8 weeks
Variance
6 -8 weeks
Parcel Map or Tract Map
6 -8 weeks
Zoning Map Amendment
8 -10 weeks
General Plan Amendment
8 -10 weeks
Environmental Review
(not including an environmental impact report)
Processed in conjunction with the application. It's
included in the overall processing time.
Building Permit
6 -8 weeks for plan check
Source: City of Baldwin Park Staff, 2013
Due to City budget constraints, the Planning Department has recently eliminated
multiple staff positions. The City will continue to make every effort to maintain
these estimated processing times.
Pursuant to State law, Baldwin Park permits state - licensed residential care facilities
serving six or fewer persons in all of its residential zoning districts by right.
Residential care facilities (defined as having more than six persons) require a CUP in
all residential zones.
As stated previously, the City has adopted the 2010 California Building Code.
Standards within the Code include provisions to ensure accessibility for persons
with disabilities. These standards are consistent with the Americans with
Disabilities Act. No local amendments that would constrain accessibility or increase
the cost of housing for persons with disabilities have been adopted. To
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -64 2014 -2021 Housing Element
accommodate disabled persons in public facilities, the City defers to Title 24 of the
California Handicap Accessibility Code.
The definition of "family" may limit access to housing for persons with disabilities
when municipalities narrowly define the word, illegally limiting the development of
group homes for persons with disabilities, but not for housing similar sized and
situated families. The Baldwin Park Zoning Code includes the following definition of
family: A group of persons, whether related or unrelated, who live together in a
nontransient and interactive manner, including the joint use of common areas of the
premises which they occupy and sharing household activities and responsibilities such
as meals, chores, and expenses. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any group of persons
required to be considered as a °fannily° for zoning purposes pursuant to California
Health & Safety Code Sections 1267.8, 15663, 1568.0831, 1569.85, 11834.23, or any
other state law shall be deemed to be a family for purposes of this code. This definition
does not discriminate nor limit access to housing for persons with disabilities.
The Fair Housing Act, as amended in 1988, requires that cities and counties provide
reasonable accommodation to rules, policies, practices and procedures where such
accommodation may be necessary to afford individuals with disabilities equal
housing opportunities. While fair housing laws intend that all people have equal
access to housing, the law also recognizes that people with disabilities may need
extra tools to achieve equality. Reasonable accommodation is one of the toots
intended to further housing opportunities for people with disabilities. For
developers and providers of housing for people with disabilities who are often
confronted with siting or use restrictions, reasonable accommodation provides a
means of requesting from the local government flexibility in the application of land
use and zoning regulations or, in some instances, even a waiver of certain
restrictions or requirements because it is necessary to achieve equal access to
housing. Cities and counties are required to consider requests for accommodations
related to housing for people with disabilities and provide the accommodation when
it is determined to be "reasonable" based on fair housing laws and the case law
interpreting the statutes.
State law allows for a statutorily based four -part analysis to be used in evaluating
requests for reasonable accommodation related to land use and zoning matters and
can be incorporated into reasonable accommodation procedures. This analysis gives
great weight to furthering the housing needs of people with disabilities and also
considers the impact or effect of providing the requested accommodation on the
City and its overall zoning scheme. Developers and providers of housing for people
with disabilities must be ready to address each element of the following four -part
analysis:
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -6S 2014 -2021 Housing Element
• The housing that is the subject of the request for reasonable accommodation
is for people with disabilities as defined in federal or state fair housing laws;
• The reasonable accommodation requested is necessary to make specific
housing available to people with disabilities who are protected under fair
housing laws;
• The requested accommodation will not impose an undue financial or
administrative burden oo the local government; and
• The requested accommodation will not result in a fundamental alteration in
the local zoning code.
To create a process for making requests for reasonable accommodation to land use
and zoning decisions and procedures regulating the siting, funding, development,
and use of housing for people with disabilities, the City adopted a reasonable
accommodation ordinance as part of the 2012 comprehensive Zoning Code update.
Many factors that relate to housing costs are related to the larger housing market in
general. Land costs, construction costs, and labor costs all contribute tn the cost of
housing, and can hinder the production of affordable housing, Additionally, the
availability of financing can limit access to homeownership for some low-income
households. Market-related constraints are part of regional trends related to
housing and local jurisdictions seldom have any control over these.
Construction costs vary widely according to the type of development, mithmuld-
familybousi generally being less expensive to construct than single-family homes,
relative to the number of dwelling units. However, there is wide variation within
each construction type, depending on the size of the unit, the number and quality of
amenities provided, quality of construction, and the types and quality of materials
used. f\ootbnr factor related to construction costs is the number of units built at one
time. As the number increase, overall costs generally decrease as builders can
benefit from the economies o[scale. Additionally, manufactured housing (including
both mobile homes and modular housing) may provide for lower-priced housing by
reducing construction and labor costs.
Laud is perhaps the major variable cost component io producing new housing. A
very limited amount of vacant land is available in Baldwin Park. A survey of land
sales reveals that only two residential properties were listed in October 2012. One
of these lots, under an acre in size contains an approved project to develop 13
tnvvobonoos. The other property listed for sale isl.lZ acres, is zoned for multifamily
Baldwin Park 2O%U General Plan BE-66 2U14-ZUZl Housing Element
residential development, and is currently used as a parking lot, The average cost
per square foot for these sites isat $3625 per square foot, or$l.6 million per acre.
Mug no-W
The California Labor Code applies prevailing wage rates to public works projects
exceeding $1,000 in value. Public works projects include construction, alteration,
installation, demolition, or repair work performed under contract and paid for in
vvbn|m or in pod out of public funds. While the cost differential in prevailing and
standard wages varies based on the skill level of the occupation, prevailing wages
tend 10 add to the overall cost of development. In the case of affordable housing
projects, prevailing wage requirements could effectively reduce the number of
affordable units that can bc achieved with public subsidies.
The availability n[ financing for ahome greatly affects a person's ability Lopurchase
obocne nr invest in repairs and improvements. The Horne Mortgage Disclosure Act
<BMDAl requires lending institutions tn disclose information oo the disposition of
loan applications 6v income, gender, and race/ethnicity ofapplicants.
Table B-4O presents the disposition ofhome purchase loan applications ioZO20bn
income of the applicants. The data are for the Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale
K43A, of which Baldwin Park is a part. The data include purchases of one- to four-
unit homes as well as manufactured homes. Over 50 percent of the loan applications
were received from households that reported their income as above moderate-
income (earning greater than 120 percent of Median Family locncoo [K4PD).
Moderate-income households (80 to 120 percent of K4FU and lower-income
households (less than 80 yerccotK8Fll accounted for 18 percent and 12 percent,
respective/y. Almost two-thirds (63 percent) of the applications were originated
(approved by lenders and accepted by applicants) and over 14 percent were denied,
with the remaining 23 percent of the applications withdrawn, closed for
incompleteness, or not accepted bythe applicants. As expected, the denial rate was
lowest for the moderate- and upper-income groups.
Government-backed lending represents a significant alternative financing option for
Baldwin Park residents. While previously underutilized, government-assisted home
purchases now represent o significant portion of the market. Almost 37,900 Los
Angeles area households applied for government-backed lending io ZOlO [Table H-
41), compared to ooly33Z in 2006. Usually, low-income households have amuch
better chance of getting a government-assisted |nao than a conventional loan,
especially due to lower down payment requirements, As such, the proportion of
lower-income and moderate-income households applying for these types of
mortgages was higher than the proportions for conventional mortgages.
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-67 2014-2021 Housing Element
Both application rates and origination rates in conventional and government -
backed lending have contracted significantly in recent years; in 2006, nearly
300,000 households applied for a conventional mortgage, compared to only 56,868
in 2010.
Table H -40
Disposition of Conventional Home Purchase Loan Applications for the
Los Angeles -Long Beach- Glendale MSA (20 .0)
Applicant Income
Total
Apps.
Percent of
Total
% Orig.
% Denied
% Other*
Lower Income ( <80% MFI)
6,733
12%
57%
20%
23%
Moderate Income (80 to 1.20% MR)
10,416
18%
63%
15%
22%
Upper Income ( >120% MR)
30,683
54%
66%
12%
22%
All
56,868 **
63%
14%
23%
Source: Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA), 2010.
* "Other" includes applications approved but not accepted, withdrawn, and files closed for incompleteness.
* *Totals do not match up based on the unavailability of income data for some applicants.
Table H -41
Disposition of Government- Assisted Home Purchase Loan Applications for the
Los Angeles -Long Beach- Glendale MSA (2010)
Applicant Income
Total
Apps.
Percent of
Total
% Orig.
% Denied
% Other*
Lower Income ( <80% MR)
8,668
23%
59%
20%
21%
Moderate Income (80 to 120% MFI)
11,114
29%
64%
15%
20%
Upper Income ( >120% MR)
13,871
37%
68%
14%
18%
All
37,883 **
64%
16%
20%
Source: Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA), 2010.
* "Other" includes applications approved but not accepted, withdrawn, and files closed for incompleteness.
* *Totals do not match up based on the unavailability of income data for some applicants.
Interest rates substantially impact home construction, purchase, and improvement
costs. A fluctuation in rates of just 2.5 percent can make a drastic difference in the
annual income needed to qualify for a loan. In the recent past, Baldwin Park and the
country as a whole have experienced interest rates at historically low levels,
enabling many households to purchase a home. Even so, the availability and cost of
capital required for pre - development costs for new housing, such as land purchase
option money and project design and entitlement processing, as well as uncertainty
in the larger housing market, may remain a deterrent to development of affordable
multi - family housing.
The entire nation, and the Southern California region in particular, experienced
large numbers of foreclosures during the recent housing crisis. In many cases,
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -68 2014 -2021 Housing Element
financing for these homes was made through the sub -prime credit market. Sub -
prime loans are characterized by higher interest rates and fees than prime loans,
and are more likely to include prepayment penalties. Beginning in 2006,
foreclosures began a dramatic rise, indicative of the housing and larger economic
crisis of the Great Recession. In 2012, we are finally beginning to see a decrease in
new Notices of Default throughout California, as indicated in Table H -42.
Table H -42
Southern California Notices of Default
County/Region
201101
2012Q1
Percent Change
Los Angeles
13,957
11,443
-18.0%
Orange
4,652
3,733
-19.8%
San Diego
4,758
4,1.85
-12.0%
Riverside
6,769
5,542
-18.1%
San Bernardino
5,514
4,722
-14.4%
Ventura
1,437
1,255
-117%
Imperial
289
257
-11.1%
Southern CA
37,376
31,137
-16.7%
Source: DataQuick April 24, 2012 News Release, Further Decline in California Foreclosure
Activity
Baldwin Park has several environmental constraints that affect potential
development. These constraints - associated with seismic activity, liquefaction, and
potential dam failure - can preclude or restrict the development of housing. This
section examines these constraints.
The potential for seismic activity and ground shaking in Baldwin Park depends on
the proximity to the affected fault and the intensity of the seismic event along the
fault. Like many cities in Southern California and along the base of the San Gabriel
Mountains in particular, Baldwin Park lies near several fault zones, although no
Aquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones (active faults) had been mapped within the
Baldwin Park city limits. Movement along any of the regional faults or fault zones
(Whittier, Puente Hills, San Jose, Sierra Madre, Indian Hills, and Raymond) has the
potential to create groundshaking in the City. The severity of shaking depends up
the location of the earthquake, its intensity, and the duration.
The City has implemented the 2020 California Building Code seismic safety
standards for structural construction. The City will continue to enact these and
other seismic safety programs to minimize hazards from earthquakes and other
seismic hazards.
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -69 2014 -2021 Housing Element
A secondary effect from earthquakes includes liquefaction. Liquefaction is the loss of
strength that can occur in loose, saturated soil during or following seismic shaking.
This condition can produce a number of ground effects, including lateral spreading,
boils, ground lurching, and settlement of fill material. Liquefaction hazards can
occur in areas where groundwater exists near the ground surface. Data provided by
water service providers in Baldwin Park indicate that a depth to groundwater is
more that 50 feet, and therefore liquefaction hazards are generally low. However,
maps published by the State Division of Mines and Geology (1999) document areas
of historic liquefaction occurrence in the southwest portion of Baldwin Park
Liquefaction hazards, vvborc present, can generally be remedied by standard
engineering practices.
Failure of the Santa Fe Dam due to seismic activity has the potential to impact the
City of Baldwin Park, as well as other nearby communities. The dam is located on
the Sao Gabriel River, about four oni|ao downstream from the mouth of the San
Gabriel Canyon and approximately one-half mile north of Baldwin Pack. The San
Gabriel River originates on the southern slopes of the San Gabriel Mountains. It
flows through precipitous canyons to the base of the mountains, thence across a
broad alluvial cone to Santa Pc Reservoir, and through the Sao Gabriel Valley to
\Nbitbor Narrows Reservoir. Santa Fa Dam is an usscoda| o|ecnont of the Los
Angeles County Drainage Area flood control system. The primary purpose of the
dam is to provide flood protection for the densely populated area between the dam
and Whittier Narrows Reservoir. The dam is nvvoed and operated by the Los
Angeles District of the Army Corps o[Engineers,
Army Corps ofEngineers flood emergency plan data indicates that failure of the
Santa Fe Dam would result in the entire City ofBaldwin Park being flooded. Water
depths would range from 2 to 12 feet, with xba}lovv depths located at farther
distance from the dam.
State law requires every dam owner to develop and maintain an emergency plan to
be ioup1ccoxotnd in the event that the dam in catastrophically breached. Each dam-
specific emergency plan includes a map that shows the potential limits of the flood
that could result of flood that could result if the dam should fail vnbilc filled to
capacity. These flood maps are considered asa worst-case scenario. Since most
dams in Southern California are not normally filled to capacity, the possibility of
inundation io the City nf Baldwin Park isremote.
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-70 2014-2021 Housing Element
In planning for future residential development, it is important to cva1uate current
service levels provided to existing residents, deficiencies in the levels of services
provided, and the need for additional public services and facilities to support new
devc]opruent. This section addresses the ability of water and wastewater utilities to
serve an increase inpopulation.
Potable water io Baldwin Park is provided hn three water companies: Valley County
Water District, San Gabriel Valley Water Coozpaoy, and Valley View Mutual Water
Company. The Valley County Water District is the City's largest water supplier and
serves approximately 55,000 people in parts of Baldwin Pack and neighborhood
cities. Their main water source is supplied from wells beneath their service area
from the Upper San Gabriel Groundwater Basin, including four wells in Baldwin
Podc The San Gabriel Valley Water Company supplies water exclusively from
groundwater wells to customers in Baldwin Park and surrounding cities. Most of
the wells are located in Baldwin Park and 8l Monte, and six of the company's
reservoirs serve Baldwin Park. The City's smallest water supplier is the Valley View
Mutual Water Company, vvbicb supplies approximately eight percent of Baldwin
Park's population. 1t also receives water from wells.
A major issue these water companies confront is water contamination. Baldwin
Park is located in one of four Sao Gabriel Valley 3uperfuod sites identified by the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). High concentrations of volatile organic
compounds, cleaning solvents historically used by machine shops and dryc|eaners,
have been found in many of the wells in Baldwin Park. Water utilities have been able
to continue to provide their customers with clean water byshutting down wells in
contaminated areas, installing "vvaUboad" treatment systems, blending
contaminated water with clean water to oucct drinking water standards, and
obtaining water from neighboring utilizes. The EP/\, in conjunction with local
agencies, is working on a long-range plan to extract the contaminated water and
replace it with treated and cleaner water.
Valley County Water District, the main water supplier to Baldwin Park, has not
reached their maximum capacity for water production from wells. The 2010 Urban
Water Management Plan indicates they have the potential to increase their average
production of well water to meet an increase in water demand as a result of new
residential development.
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-71 2014-2021 Housing Element
Baldwin Park lies within the service area of Los Angeles County Sanitation District
No. 15. Wastewater generated mi1bio the [bv is discharged to local sewer hoes
maintained by the City for conveyance to the County Sanitation District of Los
/\uge|eo County truck sewer network, Wastewater is treated at the Sao Jose Creek
Water Reclamation Plant (SJCWRP) near the City of Whittier, where it is treated and
reused as groundwater recharge and irrigation of parks, schools, and greenbelts.
Authorities at the Los Angeles County Sanitation District No. 25 consider the trunk
system and treatment facilities adequate at the present droe. The Los Angeles
County Department of Public Works, 3mvver Maintenance Division, and the Baldwin
Park Engineering Division consider the sewer line system adequate to handle
foreseeable future development.
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-72 2014-2021 Housing Element
This section analyzes the resources available for the development, rehabilitation,
and preservation of housing in 8a1dvvu Park. This includes an evaluation of the
availability of land resources, the City's ability to satisfy its share of the ion's
future housing needs, the financial resources available to support the provision of
affordable housing, as well as the administrative resources available to assist in
implementing the City's housing programs.
3CAG has assigned cacbconamuobnasbaroofthc region's projected bousi need
for the period of 2014-3021. Therefore, an important component of the Housing
Element is the identification of land resources and assessment of these sites' ability
to meet the City's projected housing need. In Baldwin Park residential growth will
be focused in vacant and underutilized sites within the K8u|d'Farnik/ Residential
area (8'3 zone) and within areas designated as Mixed-Use by the Ceouro] Plan and
Zoning Code. The following discussion summarizes the residential growth potential
in these areas and concludes by demonstrating that these sites can address the
City's share of regional boosingoeeds.
California State law requires each city and county to have land zoned to
accommodate its fair share of regional housing need. This share for the SCAG region
is known as the Regional Housing Needs Allocation, or DBNA. The California
Department of Housing and Community Development determined that the projected
housing need for the Southern California region (including the counties of Los
Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, Ventura, and Imperial) is 412,137 new
housing units for this Housing Elooncot planning period. 5CAG allocated this
projected growth to the various cities and unincorporated county areas within the
3C/\C region, creating the 8ByJ& The R8NA is divided into four income categories:
very low, low, moderate, and above moderate. As determined by SCAG, the City of
Baldwin Park's fair share allocation in 557 new housing units during this planning
cycle, with the units distributed among the [our income categories as sbovvu in
Table 8'43. The City must demonstrate that its land inventory is sufficient to
facilitate and encourage the development of affordable housing that is accessible to
a variety of income groups.
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-73 2014-2021 Housing Element
Income Group
% of County MFI
RHNA
(Housing Units)
Percentage
of Units
Very Low
0-500/0
142
25.3%
Moderate
81-120%
90
16.2%
Above Moderate
120%+
242
43.1%
Total
557
1000/0
Since the RBNA uses January l'2O14as the baseline for growth projections for the
Housing Element planning period ofZ0l4tn2OZl, jurisdictions may not count units
built or issued certificates of occupancy in 2012 or 2013; these units are counted
toward fulfilling the previous RHNA.
IL 11I
State |avv requires that jurisdictions demonstrate in the Housing Element that the
land inventory is adequate to accommodate that jurisdiction's share ofthe region's
projected growth. This is accomplished through ao evaluation of the City's vacant
and underutilized residential and mixed-use land.
Baldwin Park is largely built out. The major constraint oo residential construction is
the lock of developable land and the resultant pnyouiunu cost of finished units as
demand exceeds supply. The inventory of vacant land designated for Multi-Family
Residential development totals 1.7 acres. In the Garden 04ultiPaooik/Residcnda|
zone, there is one vacant lot consisting of four contiguous parcels on Pacific Avenue
totaling 3Zacres.
As discussed in the Housing Constraints section of this Housing Element, the Multi-
Family Residential /and use category correlates with the B-3 zone in the Zoning
Code, and permits densities of up to 20 units per acre. These vacant sites are likely
to develop during the planning period, i especia|k/ due to the limited amount of
vacant residential land in the area. Two of the sites located on Ramona Boulevard
are adjoining (Figure H'4). Ibcsz two sites have the potential for lot consolidation
and the development of at least lO units. Conservatively assuming development at
RQ percent o[ maximum capacity, together all o[ the vacant properties located iothe
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-74 2014-2021 Housing Element
R,3 zone have the potential to yield 28 units. The densities that can beachieved in
this zone are appropriate to facilitate the production of housing that is affordable to
moderate-income households.
Table H'44
Summary of Residential Capacity on Vacant Land
Source: uogb'Irrbud Inc, 2012
Note: Realistic Potential Housing Units were calculated at 80 percent of maximum density
8aJdvvbn Park also has a limited number of properties zoned 8-3 that could
potentially be redeveloped at higher densities. These properties encompass over 12
acres, are transitional in nature, and can convert to nooid'faooil« residential use
without Planning Commission or City Council approvai iofi|l trends in the City
indicate that o)u)d'faoni|v developments such as apadrnco1 and condominium
developments are the most likely residential product tobcproduced. Recycling to
high cr'ioteuuity uses io very probable given the scarcity o/ land in Baldwin Park.
Table H-45 presents a summary of residential capacity on underutilized residential
land. /\ detailed listing of the underutilized properties is included in Appendix B.
The City has only identified properties that have the potential for sufficient added
capacity tn make recycling of land economically feasible. For all properties included
in this inventory, conservative realistic capacity (80 percent of maximum density)
was defined as more than twice the number of existing housing units for each
parcel. Further, four o[the sites involve adjoining parcels, increasing the likelihood
of lot consolidation and the development of new housing units. On lots with the
potential tohe consolidated, there is the capacity for 68 new units. One o[ the sites
consists of three contiguous parcels that can be consolidated with the potential for
29 units. Another parcel is currently used for industrial purposes, but is designated
in the General Plan and zoned for residential use. This site has the potential for 31
new dwelling units. See Appendix B for site specific details.
The densities that can be achieved in the R-3 areas are appropriate to facilitate the
production of housing that is affordable to moderate-income households. The
moderately sized properties in this zone consist of mix of multi-family and single-
family units. Recyclable land within the R-3 zone has the capacity to yield 188 units.
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-7S 2014-2021 Housing Element
Realistic
Maximum
Potential
Affordability
General Plan
Zoning
Density
Acres
Housing Units
Level
Garden
Above-
Residential
R-G
12 du/ac
12
30
Moderate
Multi-Family
Residential
R-3
20 du/ac
1.7
28
Moderate
Source: uogb'Irrbud Inc, 2012
Note: Realistic Potential Housing Units were calculated at 80 percent of maximum density
8aJdvvbn Park also has a limited number of properties zoned 8-3 that could
potentially be redeveloped at higher densities. These properties encompass over 12
acres, are transitional in nature, and can convert to nooid'faooil« residential use
without Planning Commission or City Council approvai iofi|l trends in the City
indicate that o)u)d'faoni|v developments such as apadrnco1 and condominium
developments are the most likely residential product tobcproduced. Recycling to
high cr'ioteuuity uses io very probable given the scarcity o/ land in Baldwin Park.
Table H-45 presents a summary of residential capacity on underutilized residential
land. /\ detailed listing of the underutilized properties is included in Appendix B.
The City has only identified properties that have the potential for sufficient added
capacity tn make recycling of land economically feasible. For all properties included
in this inventory, conservative realistic capacity (80 percent of maximum density)
was defined as more than twice the number of existing housing units for each
parcel. Further, four o[the sites involve adjoining parcels, increasing the likelihood
of lot consolidation and the development of new housing units. On lots with the
potential tohe consolidated, there is the capacity for 68 new units. One o[ the sites
consists of three contiguous parcels that can be consolidated with the potential for
29 units. Another parcel is currently used for industrial purposes, but is designated
in the General Plan and zoned for residential use. This site has the potential for 31
new dwelling units. See Appendix B for site specific details.
The densities that can be achieved in the R-3 areas are appropriate to facilitate the
production of housing that is affordable to moderate-income households. The
moderately sized properties in this zone consist of mix of multi-family and single-
family units. Recyclable land within the R-3 zone has the capacity to yield 188 units.
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-7S 2014-2021 Housing Element
Table H-45
Summary of Residential Capacity on Underutilized Residential Land
Source: Rvglc-lrdaod. Inc ,Ioz2
mmc: Realistic Potential �ums/ngDoitswcr calculated zu80 percent of maximum density
Taken together, there is currently a reserve of vacant and underutilized land in
residential zones that can accommodate 246 new multi-family units.
One of the greatest opportunities for infill development in Baldwin Park is found in
areas designated Mixed Oxo, including the greater downtown area and along North
Maine Avenue. The potential for creation of residential units in mixed-use areas is
predicated on the interest from developers - expressed to the City - and on the
limited opportunities for higher-density development elsewhere in the City or in the
immediate surrounding area.
Consistent with the Land Use Element, the City encourages residential uses in areas
designated as Mixed Use to support a viable pedestrian district in dovvutnvvn and
along North Maine Avenue. The Land Use Element vision for Mixed Use consists of
budb retail and commercial in conjunction with hiobrr'deosityreoidcoda| uses. In
the Mixed-Use 2 zone, vertically integrated mixed-use projects are allowed, or
stand-alone residential or stand-alone neighborhood commercial may be
constructed. /\ density incentive (O.S increase in FAR) is offered for commercial
projects that include arcsideoba1 component in Mixed Use areas. Dcvo]opnnrot
within the Mixed Use areas is permitted to achieve densities nf3Ounits per acre per
the General Plan.
Zoning regulations have been tailored to facilitate housing development atthese
densities. The rnoriruuro residential density in the K8U'1 zone is 30 dwelling units
per acre, with a required minimum lot area of 15,000 square feet. In the MU-2 zone,
the rnaxiruurn residential density is 30 dwelling units per acre on lots with a
nuioioouro of 20,000 square feet. Lots laoo than 20,000 square feet in size have a
nuazionuno density of 15 units per acre. These provisions encourage lot
consolidation to achieve greater densities.
The sites inventory analysis identifies 11 mixed-use sites with the potential
combined capacity for 774 units (7ab|c 8-46). Figure 8-4 indicates the location of
all sites identified in this Housing Element, and a detailed listing of parcels is
included in Appendix B. Due to the density at which the Mixed-Use sites are
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-76 2014-2021 Housing Element
Realistic
Maximum
Existing
Potential
Affordability
General Plan
Zoning
Density
Acres
Units
Housing Units
Level
Multi-Family
R-3
20 du/ac
12
25
188
Moderate
Source: Rvglc-lrdaod. Inc ,Ioz2
mmc: Realistic Potential �ums/ngDoitswcr calculated zu80 percent of maximum density
Taken together, there is currently a reserve of vacant and underutilized land in
residential zones that can accommodate 246 new multi-family units.
One of the greatest opportunities for infill development in Baldwin Park is found in
areas designated Mixed Oxo, including the greater downtown area and along North
Maine Avenue. The potential for creation of residential units in mixed-use areas is
predicated on the interest from developers - expressed to the City - and on the
limited opportunities for higher-density development elsewhere in the City or in the
immediate surrounding area.
Consistent with the Land Use Element, the City encourages residential uses in areas
designated as Mixed Use to support a viable pedestrian district in dovvutnvvn and
along North Maine Avenue. The Land Use Element vision for Mixed Use consists of
budb retail and commercial in conjunction with hiobrr'deosityreoidcoda| uses. In
the Mixed-Use 2 zone, vertically integrated mixed-use projects are allowed, or
stand-alone residential or stand-alone neighborhood commercial may be
constructed. /\ density incentive (O.S increase in FAR) is offered for commercial
projects that include arcsideoba1 component in Mixed Use areas. Dcvo]opnnrot
within the Mixed Use areas is permitted to achieve densities nf3Ounits per acre per
the General Plan.
Zoning regulations have been tailored to facilitate housing development atthese
densities. The rnoriruuro residential density in the K8U'1 zone is 30 dwelling units
per acre, with a required minimum lot area of 15,000 square feet. In the MU-2 zone,
the rnaxiruurn residential density is 30 dwelling units per acre on lots with a
nuioioouro of 20,000 square feet. Lots laoo than 20,000 square feet in size have a
nuazionuno density of 15 units per acre. These provisions encourage lot
consolidation to achieve greater densities.
The sites inventory analysis identifies 11 mixed-use sites with the potential
combined capacity for 774 units (7ab|c 8-46). Figure 8-4 indicates the location of
all sites identified in this Housing Element, and a detailed listing of parcels is
included in Appendix B. Due to the density at which the Mixed-Use sites are
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-76 2014-2021 Housing Element
available, the potential units are counted toward the lower- income categories for
the RHNA, consistent with State law.
Table H -46
Mixed -Use Opportunity Areas
Area
General
Zoning
Maximum
Acres
Parcels
Existing
Potential
Affordability
Plan
Residential
Housing
(lousing
level
Density
Units
Units
Site A
Mixed
MU -2
30 du /acre
2.52
7
1
61
Lower
Use
Site B
Mixed
MU -2
30 du /acre
0.75
4
1
18
Lower
Use
Site C
Mixed
MU -2
30 du /acre
0.91
3
2
22
Lower
Use
Site D
Mixed
MU -2
30 du /acre
0.64
2
0
15
Lower
Use
Site E
Mixed
MU -2
30 du /acre
2.80
6
0
68
Lower
Use
Site F
Mixed.
MU -2
30 du /acre
0.74
4
2
17
Lower
Use
Site G
Mixed
MU -1
30 du /acre
6.43
1
0
154
Lower
Use
Site H
Mixed
MU -1
30 du /acre
105
8
2
49
Lower
Use
Site I
Mixed
MU -1
30 du /acre
1.08
8
1
24
Lower
Use
Site J
Mixed
MU -1
30 du /acre
1.53
8
0
27
Lower
Use
Site K
Mixed
MU -1
30 du /acre
1334
15
0
319
Lower
Use
Total
32.79
66
9
774
Source: Hogle- Ireland, Inc., 2012
Notes:
1. Realistic Potential Housing Units were calculated at 80 percent of maximum density
2. All sites chosen involve more than 0.5 acres, some with lot consolidation of underutilized parcels
3. All sites chosen yield at least two times the number of existing units on site.
Many of the residential and mixed -use sites chosen are contiguous parcels and
provide opportunities for lot consolidation. The General Plan Land Use Element
includes several policies to encourage lot consolidation and reuse of existing
properties in the Mixed Use areas to facilitate integration of residential and
commercial uses.
Since 2000, a number of projects have joined contiguous parcels as part of project
development, many of which included affordable housing components, as indicated
in Table H -47. The City's history of approvals listed in Table H -47 demonstrates that
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -77 2014 -2021 Housing Element
there is developer interest in consolidating parcels in the City, and that Baldwin
Park has few constraints to lot consolidation associated with new projects.
The Mixed -Use Opportunity areas listed in Table H -46 include a number of adjacent
parcels to provide opportunities for lot consolidation. Because the City recognizes
the potential difficulties that may be associated with lot consolidations involving
multiple property owners, more than adequate sites have been identified.
Underutilized sites may be parceled together to provide the most appropriate
developments.
A tool to further incentivize tot consolidation is known as "graduated density
zoning." This tool offers increased density based on the size of the site, thereby
encouraging owners of adjoining properties to collaborate in development or to
package parcels for sale. The City of Baldwin Park's revised Zoning Code includes
this provision for the MU -2 zone. In MU -2, sites of less than 15,000 square feet may
develop up to a density of 15 du /acre, while those over 15,000 square feet may
develop at 30 du /acre. This incentive has proven extremely effective in other
Southern California jurisdictions, such as Simi Valley and Alhambra.
Table H -47
Sample History of Lot Consolidations
Source: Baldwin Park., 2012
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -78 2014 -2021 Housing Element
Total
Planning
Affordable
Total
Square
Commission
Project Name /Address
Zoning
Total Units
Units
Lots
Footage
Approval Date
Specific
71 attached
71 units
13022 -62 Ramona Blvd.
Plan
units
(low)
8
120,245
August 4, 1999
12800 -12806 Dalewood
Specific
34 detached
3 units
St.
Plan
units
(moderate)
3
159,429
June 4, 2001
14700 -14728 Badillo St.
Specific
36 detached
7 units
2
146,730
March 28, 2001
Plan
units
(moderate)
3722 -3736 Merced Ave.
PD (RG)
16 detached
2 units
3
61,803
October 9, 2002
units
(moderate)
3714 -3728 Maine Ave.
PD (R -1)
17 detached
1 unit
3
81,170
October 23,
units
(moderate)
2002
4751 Center St.
PD (R -1)
10 detached
2 units
2
54,542
April 23, 2003
units
(low)
3940 -3948 Walnut St.
PD (R -1)
16 detached
2 units
5
66,528
July 27, 2005
units
(low)
4229 -4294 Walnut St
PD (R 1)
12 detached
2 units
2
55,074
August 24,
units
(low)
2005
3427 -3421 Baldwin
Specific
53 attached
3 units
Park Blvd.
Plan
units
(moderate)
3
117,845
May 14, 2008
Source: Baldwin Park., 2012
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -78 2014 -2021 Housing Element
a
a�
w
a
N
O
N
O
N
ctS
a
c,
N
C7
O
N
O
N
c4
c�
cCS
O
bA
E
ap
E
O
O
CD
OP
W
as
cG
7z-
C\l
C:)
F5
To encourage and facilitate the development, redevelopment, restoration, and
intensification of high - density residential and mixed -uses within areas designated
Mixed -Use in the General Plan, the City amended the Zoning Code in 2012 to ensure
that the development standards, incentives, and the overall vision for mixed -use in
Baldwin Park is incorporated and furthered through appropriate development
standards.
Consistent with HCD Guidelines, methodology for determining realistic capacity on
each identified site must account for land -use controls and site improvements. The
Baldwin Park Sites Inventory utilized a conservative estimate of 80 percent of
maximum development to demonstrate realistic capacity for development.
However, most recent projects have achieved densities very near actual maximum
densities, and many have exceeded maximums due to the use of density bonuses in
exchange for the provision of affordable housing. Table H -48 outlines the results of a
survey of seven projects approved since 2000.
Table H -48
Sample History of Realistic Capacity
Project
Approval
Total
Permitted
Actual
Name /Address
Date
Zoning
Units
Density (1)
density
Difference
3346 -3354 Vineland
2011
R -1
15
8.7 du /ac
10.3 du /ac
+18%
Avenue
3427 -3421 Baldwin
Specific
Park BIvd.
2008
Plan
53
12 du /ac (Z)
19.26 du /ac
+60%
4229 -4294 Walnut St.
2005
PD (R -1)
12
8.7 du /ac
9.5 du /ac
+9%
13356 -13358 Ramona
2003
R -G
10
12 du /ac
14.9 du /ac
+24%
Boulevard
3714 -3728 Maine Ave.
2002
PD (R -1)
17
8.7 du /ac
9.14 du /ac
+5%
3722 -3736 Merced
2002
PD (RG)
16
12 du /ac
11.3 du /ac
-6%
Ave.
13022 -62 Ramona
Specific
Blvd.
1999
Plan
71
20 du /ac (3)
25.7 du /ac
+ 28.S%
Notes:
1. Permitted Density refers to the permitted density per Zoning Code and General Plan. Projects that were
approved at densities above these permitted densities were approved in conjunction with density bonuses.
2. The Specific Plan included a zone change, which allowed a higher density on this site. Prior to rezoning, the site
was Residential Garden, permitting densities of 12 units per acre.
3. The Specific Plan included a zone change on the majority of the parcels from C -2 and R -1 to residential. One
parcel was R -3 prior to the zone change.
Most projects achieved densities above maximum permitted limits through the use
of Planned Development Permits and density bonuses. Only one project surveyed
resulted in development at less than permitted maximum density, at 94 percent of
maximum density. In addition, the survey also revealed one successful project that
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE -81 2014 -2021 Housing Element
indicates the feasibility of development of both affordable housing and high-density
housing in Baldwin Park /\ 71-unit very low- and low-income housing project,
approved by Planning Commission in 1999 and completed in 200I' achieved a
density ofJ5.7 units per acre, inau area that generally permits 2O units per acre.
Based no development history in Baldwin Park the assumption that new
dcvalopznco1 may occur at 80 percent of maximum density (i.e. 16 units per acre in
R-3 areas and 24 units per acre in Mixed-Use areas) represents a conservative
estimate. However, because the City has approved a limited number of mixed-use
projects and is relying onMixcd-DscforcoauyoftbesiLes,tbiscouservaLivrcsticnate
was used for capacity analysis in this Housing Element. Both ''vcrhca[' and
"horizontal" mixed-use development may occur in Mixed-Use areas, although the
housing portion of mixed-use is not allowed at intersection corners. The City has
crafted the mixed-use standards so that nuadrouou densities may be achieved
through increased heights, decreased set-back requirements, and the potential for
horizontal mixed-use.
Baldwin Park's mixed-use areas do allow projects that do not include a residential
component. However, incentives are in place in the General Plan and Zoning Code to
encourage the inclusion of residential uses in new developments. Specifically, the
General Plan and Zoning Code provide an FAR incentive in mixed-use areas: if
residential uses are included, the permitted FAR for the commercial component is
2.0 rather than 1.5 for stand-alone commercial developments,
In order to account for the extent to which uses other than residential are allowed in
mixed-use areas, more than twice as many sites were identified iothe 2014-202I
Housing Element than were required to meet the 88N/\ [see Table R-49). The sites
identified represent the most realistic opportunities for redevelopment with
residential uses, due to their underutilized nature and location near transit and
services. In addition, these sites only represent approximately two-thirds of all
mixed-use areas in the City. As such, there are ample available opportunities for
residential, mixed-use, and commercial development within Baldwin Park's mixed-
use areas.
All residential and mixed-use udzs identified in the inventory are located within
urbanized areas, where infrastructure and public services are readily available.
Public services and facilities are available to adequately serve all of the potential
housing sites. Lateral water and sewer lines would be extended onto the properties
from the adjoining public rights-of-way as development occurs. Any missing public
improvements (e.g. curbs, gutters, sidewalks, etc] along property frontages would
also be constructed at that time. Site specific constraints are listed in the Sites
Inventory Table, located in Appendix O.
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-82 2014-2021 Housing Element
Combined, the underutilized residential areas and the opportunity sites identified io
the Mixed Use areas have the potential to accommodate 962 residential units. As
Table 8-49 indicates, these sites and the densities uUnvvcd will provide
opportunities to achieve remaining RB0A goals for all income categories.
The City has identified sites in Mixed-Use areas for 774 residential units and sites in
underutilized and vacant residential areas to accommodate 346 units. Together
these sites have the potential for 463 residential units beyond the BDN/\. This
surplus of units ensures that even if a fraction of the sites are developed, they will
meet the City's identified need for the planning period.
The opportunity areas identified bnxobe sites that can realistically be redeveloped
with residential units during the planning period. These areas are considered highly
likely to experience recycling for two key reasons: ll the bieb demand for more
affordable housing throughout [on Angeles County, and 2) the availability of
uodcrudlizodlaodinareasrecout|ydcsignatedforooixed-use'vvitbtbepotcnda|fnr
high-density residential development. The sites chosen are significantly
underutilized given their size and location. In addition, the new mixed-use zone in
the downtown area will serve as a catalyst for more intense development in the
surrounding neighborhoods. As market forces continue to yosb toward higher
densities, recycling of underutilized land is expected to occur at an increasing rate. If
the trend continues, the City can anticipate increased recycling of land, particularly
iu higher-density areas where economies of scale can berealized.
Table H-49
Comparison of Sites Inventory and RHNA
Category
RHNA
Vacant R-3
Sites
d R-3 sites
Sites
Remaining
accommodated
Very Low
142
387
0
Low
83
387
0
Moderate
90
28
188
0
Above
Moderate
242
30
0
Total Units
SS7 1
58
188
774
1
xovroe:um4c-Ir:laou Inc., 2012
Note: Realistic Potential Housing Units were calculated atV0 percent of maximum density
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-83 2014-2021 Housing Element
One of the major factors to consider in formulating programs to preserve affordable
multi-family housing is »vbctber sufficient resources exist. Specifically, it is
important to examine the availability and adequacy of the financial and institutional
resources to support such programs. The following provides an over-view of
financial and administrative resources available for preserving and creating new
assisted multi-family units.
Through the federal Community Development Block Grant Program (CDD(),HUD
provides funds to local governments for a wide range of community development
activities. These funds can be used for the acquisition or construction of affordable
housing units, rehabilitation through a non-profit organization for housing, and
public service activities. Baldwin Park receives approximately $1.3 million annually
in CDBG funds vvbicb are currently committed to a variety of housing and
community development programs.
Another source of federal funds is available under the HOME OHoonm Investment
Partnership) program. These funds can be used to assist tenants or boroenvvumcs
through acquisition, construction, reconstruction, or the rehabilitation ofaffordable
housing, as well as first-time bonnebuyer or rental assistance. A federal priority for
use of these funds is preservation of the at-risk housing stock. Baldwin Park receives
approximately $470,000 annually in HOME funds.
Section 8l1provides funding to nonprofit organizations to develop rental housing
with the availability of supportive services for very low-income adults with
disabilities, and provides rent subsidies for projects to help make them affordable to
residents.
Through the Section 202 program, HUD provides capital advances to finance the
construction, rehabilitation or acquisition with or without rzbobUitadno of
structures that will serve as supportive housing for very low-income elderly
persons, including the frail elderly, and provides rent subsidies for projects to help
make them affordable. This program helps expand the supply of affordable housing
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-84 2014-2021 Housing Element
with supportive services for the elderly. It provides very low-income elderly with
options that allow them to live independently but in an environment that provides
support activities such as cleaning, cooking, and transportation. The IEL&CD Las
Pa1onnas affordable housing project, completed in 200I, was funded with Section
202.
The Low Income Housing Tax Credit (L}BT[or Tax Credit) program provides each
state with atax credit based on the State's population that itcan allocate towards
funding housing that meets program guidelines. These tax credits are then used to
leverage private capital into new construction or acquisition and rehabilitation of
affordable housing. The approval process toreceive Ll8ICu is very competitive in
California. Villa Ramona, a 71-unit affordable housing project, was developed with
Ll8TCsio20U4.
MR-TINOWN1 =-
The Baldwin Park Housing Authority administers the 3edjoo 8 Housing Choice
Voucher Program, which extends rental subsidies to very low-income households.
The subsidy represents the difference between the excess of 30 percent of the
recipient's monthly income and the cost of the housing unit. As of October 2012, 550
households received housing choice vouchers under the DOD Section 8 program,
and 2S0 applicants were oo the waiting list.
Agencies with administrative capacity to implement programs contained in the
Housing Element include the public agencies and departments within the City of
Baldwin Park and local and national non-profit private developers.
CVrnrnunhv Development Department
The Community Development Department oversees the divisions of Economic
Development, Planning, Housing, Building and Safety, and Code Enforcement to
promote economic development and maintain a livable community. The
department's efforts in carrying out a nddo range of community development
activities are directed towards commercial revitalization, ensuring high-quality
development and building, creation of jobs, and maintaining strong neighborhoods.
The Planning Division of Community Development Department b responsible for
meeting the community's current and future land use, urban design, economic,
transportation and housing needs by updating and maintaining the City's General
Plan and Zoning Code, and utilizing these documents as guidelines for the
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-85 2014-2021 Housing Element
development of policies and programs, and to guide the physical development of the
City. The Code Enforcement Division is responsible for responding to code
violations for substandard housing issues. Compliance is accomplished by
cooperation and educating the public, treating all residents with courtesy and
respect, and by prosecuting all major violators.
Baldwin Park Housing Authority
The Baldwin Park Housing Authority is responsible for preserving, increasing, and
improving the supply of affordable housing in the community. This is accomplished
through administration of the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program. The
Department also manages the City's 12-unit public housing project, and works with
developers to create new affordable housing opportunities for lovv'iocnooe
households.
Ao alternative to providing subsidies to existing owners tu keen units available as
affordable housing is for public or nonprofit agencies to acquire or construct
housing units that would replace at-risk units lost to conversion to market rates.
Described below are aQoocico that can serve as resources in the implementation of
housing activities in Baldwin Park and Los Angeles County.
National CORE
National Community Renaissance (National CORE) is the new name for the
combined group of companies that includes National Community Renaissance of
California (formerly Southern California Housing Development Corporation),
National Community Renaissance Development Corporation (formerly National
Housing Development Corporation), and the Hope Through Housing Foundation.
This combined agency develops, manages, and provides supportive services to 109
affordable housing communities nationwide, with a total of 9,830 affordable units.
The East Los Angeles Community Union ([ELACU)
TE[/\CD is a non-profit community development corporation founded in 1968. The
non-profit in self-sustained by TEL^4CU Industries, a for-profit family of companies
vvbicb provides the economic means to fulfill IBL/\CU's mission. TELACO builds,
owns, and manages affordable housing in cities throughout Southern California,
including Alhambra, Baldwin Park, Hawthorne, Los Angeles, Montebello, Monterey
Park, Valley, National City, Pasadena, Pacoima and Whittier. Two ]-ELACU
developments are located in Baldwin Park: T8LACD Las Palocnas [75 senior
affordable units) and TELACU Senior Complex (74 senior affordable units).
Thomas Saf ran & Associates
Thomas Safran & Associates owns and manages over 3,000 units of affordable rental
housing in California. This organization specializes in developing multi-family and
senior housing projects, many of vvbicb have vvnu awards from prestigious
Baldwin Park 2O2U General Plan 8E-86 Z014-2O%I Housing Element
organizations, In Baldwin Pad, Thomas 3afrau &Assnciatos developed the Villa
Ramona senior and family affordable project in 2004.
Residential energy costs can impact the affordability of housing in that increasing
utility costs decrease the amount of ioronoc available for roots or mortgage
payments. Baldwin Park has many opportunities to directly affect energy use within
its jurisdiction. ]`it\o 24ofthe California Administrative Code sets forth mandatory
energy standards for new housing development, and requires adoption of an
"energy budgeL" There are o variety of ways t0 meet these eu8rf&/ standards. The
home building industry roust comply with these standards, while localities are
responsible for enforcing the energy conservation regulations. Additional
opportunities for energy conservation and related savings associated with energy
conservation can be achieved through the application oFC/\[Grezo. Applicable in
January 2011, the State of California set forth a set of construction regulations,
widely known an CA[Crceo' to reduce environmental impacts through better
planning, design, and construction practices. All new commercial and residential
buildings are required to adhere to CALGreeo regulations. C/\LOreen goes along
with all other California Building Codes and supersedes other Building Code
sections in areas where they might differ. VYbUe Title 24 primarily encompasses
energy efficiency and performance, CALGreen goes beyond to address things such as
reduced construction waste, water conservation, non-toxic sealants, and renewable
materials.
Baldwin Park updated its General Plan inZOO2 and included a variety ofmeasures
that will increase energy conservation opportunities. For example, the Open Space
and Conservation Element include policies to:
• Encourage innovative building designs that conserve and ooioiroizc energy
consumption; and
• Encourage the residential and business community to install energy-saving
features and appliances in existing structures.
Io addition, the Land Use Element includes a mixed-use land use designation, Yvbich
supports compact urban development and reduced automobile usage through the
combination of multiple land uses in one location. The City's downtown K8etToliok
station provides opportunities, as indicated in the General Plan, for transit-oriented
development and the facilitation of pedestrian district. The Circulation Element
sets goals and policies to accommodate and support alternative modes of
transportation, including public transportation and bicycles, and to facilitate
pedestrian movement. Each of these measures can contribute to a cumulative
reduction iu energy consumption io Baldwin Park.
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-87 2014-2021 Housing Element
Utility companies serving Baldwin Park also offer programs to promote the efficient
use of energy and assist lower-income customers. Southern California Edison (SCE)
offers a variety of energy conservation services as part of its Energy Savings
Assistance Program. The Energy Assistance Fund helps income-qualified residential
customers facing financial hardship manage their electricity bills. These services are
dcsigocdtobe|p!ovv-ioc000rhouscbn|ds,seniorcibzpos'yernoaneodydisabled,aod
non-English speaking customers control their energy use. The Residential
Multifamily Energy Efficiency Rebate Program offers property owners and
managers incentives on a broad list of energy efficiency improvements in )igbdnA'
8VAC, insulation and vvindnvv categories. These improvements are to be used to
retrofit existing multifamily properties of two or more units.
Additionally, SCE offers various rebate programs for energy-efficient appliances and
makes available to residents energy efficient kits at no cost. The Gas Company also
offers no-cost vvoatberizadon and furnace repair or rcp1accoucot services for
qualified limited-income customers. The Comprehensive Mobile Home Program
provides qualifying mobile home customers with no-cost cocrDy conservation
evaluations, installations of low-flow shovvcrbeads and faucet aerators, and gas
energy efficiency improvements, such as duct testing and sealing of HVAC systems.
The Designed for Comfort program provides energy efficiency design assistance,
training, and incentives for housing authorities and owners of multi-family
affordable and supportive housing projects (which offer bncoos to persons with
special needs).
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-88 2014-2021 Housing Element
State Housing Element law requires coronnuodjcs h/ assess the achievements under
adopted housing programs as part of the update to their housing elements. These
results should be quantified if possible (e.g. rehabilitation results), but may be
qualitative where necessary (e.g. mitigation of governmental constraints). I`heou
results then need to be compared with vvbaL was projected or planned. VVbcrc
significant shortfalls exist between planning projections and actual achievements,
the reason for such discrepancies must bcdiscussed.
The evaluation bdpo a jurisdiction identify the extent to which adopted programs
have been successful in achieving stated objectives and addressing local needs, and
bnvv such programs continue to be relevant in addressing current and future
housing needs. The evaluation provides the basis for recommended modifications to
policies and programs in the updated element, and provides meaningful guidance
for establishing new objectives.
This section summarizes Baldwin Park's accomplishments toward implementing the
2008-2014 Housing Element. Table B'SO summarizes the quantified objectives
contained in the City's 2008-2014 Housing Element and evaluates the progress
toward fulfilling these objectives. /\ program-by-program review is presented in
Table H Sl.
Table H-50
Summary of20O8-2O14 Quantified Objectives and Progress
For the bast Housing Element cycle, the City was assigned a R0NA of 744 for the
period of January 1, 2006 through June 30, 2014. Of these 744 units, 185 units were
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-89 2014-2021 Housing Element
Income Level
Total
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Above
Construction Objectives (RHNA)
Goal
185
115
123
1 321
1 744
Owner-Occupied Rehabilitation Objectives
Goal
150
150
Rental Rehabilitation Objectives
At-Risk Preservation Objectives
Goal
174
174
_Erogre
174(100%
For the bast Housing Element cycle, the City was assigned a R0NA of 744 for the
period of January 1, 2006 through June 30, 2014. Of these 744 units, 185 units were
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-89 2014-2021 Housing Element
allocated to be affordable 10 very low-income households, 115 units to low-income
households, 123 units to moderate-income households, and 321 units k7 upper-
income households.
The 2008'2014 Housing E&en000t was found to be in compliance with Housing
Element }avv by the State in 2012. The E|ccneot demonstrated that the City had
adequate zoning and sites to meet its 2008-2014 BRN/\ of 744. Baldwin Park
maintained adequate sites under existing land use policy to facilitate the
development of additional housing units throughout the planning period.
Due to the economic downturn of recent years, the City of Baldwin Park experienced
very little residential growth between 2006 and 2012. However, the City was able
to facilitate the development of 41 new affordable housing units through the use of
density bonuses for new projects and construction of second units. Based upon a
review of Building Department records, between 2006 and 2012, approximately 28
percent of regional housing construction needs in Baldwin Park were achieved.
Residential projects that incorporate some affordable oods in conjunction with
market-rate units avoid a concentration of poverty and provide social benefits for all
residents. The following projects received financial assistance or density bonuses
from the City in exchange for affordability covenants and resulted in mixed-income
developments:
• DC Walnut/Kenmore /I6totalunjts;Z]ow-inmmel
• DC C K4onterey(Rtota|unibs; Z low-income)
m DC Walnut/Monterey (1Z total units; Z\mw-iomme)
� DC Baldwin Park Boulevard (5Z total units; 3 moderate-income)
°
Vineland/Idaho [15 total units; } very low-income)
The City has residential rehabilitation programs in place for both owner-occupied
housing and nou|d-baooik/ rental housing, Baldwin Park offers low-interest loans,
deferred rehabilitation loans, and grants tu low-income owner households, seniors,
and handicapped or disabled residents for uacdod repairs and maintenance.
Between 2006 and 2011, the City has provided 26 rehabilitation loans and grants to
homeowners utilizing HOME and CDBCfunds.
Using HOME and CDBCfuods, the City also offered low-interest loans to noWd-uod
developments for rehabilitation and repairs through the Multi-Family Rehabilitation
Program. Between 2006 and 2011, the City assisted in the rehabilitation of 16 rental
Increasing homeownership is another important City goal. Between 2OO8 and ZOlZ,
the City assisted 24 households in the purchase of their first homes. The recession
that began in 2007, rising unemployment, lower interest rates on other
government-backed loans, and lack of funds decreased the number of eligible
participants for this program and availability of the program. However, many
Baldwin Park %820 General Plan BB-90 2014-2021 Housing Element
households were able to participate in the County's Mortgage Credit Certificate
program, providing another source for first-time homebuyers to enter into
homeownership in Baldwin Park.
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-91 2014-2021 Housing Element
N
Y
r_
.i
Ln
.a
ri O
LO V
� V
Q
as E
ttT
i— by
0
0-
bap
LO
0
a�
_N
W
O
N
CD
N
c—I
CD
N
N
W
C�
a
C�
L.
Q3
Qa
C.7
d
N
O
N
C�
Sts
o
�n C
C
}
cc
ILI
m
N
t�
'C O F "Ci
""'
bD
CD
U'D�
N
O V ¢>
w 'O O
.O
Ln
O
t3
a
a
m Ln
Ln
aI
wC
R
w
w.
bA u u O
s
.��
'O
V
O cll a=+ .� bD �
O
O by
�
�
In
i.,
w Ln
N
�
Ln
a o uD
a�
$
s V
T5
O
a u
O
O
.fi
O
SU.
CZ,
E R U C
C
U
U
5
O
v O C
Ln
V N
cn
N cn N �
p N w
a
vi
O
cz
V
V
-14 ..�
LIO
ri
cV6
®
C>
U TS
O
N
O
V
O .�"'� K -0
u C
O
U V
U
U
Ln
LO
u
b�D
'O
cs
,.O
ccz v
w
c� .0
o
O
Q O
o
r
N
>
N
O
(u
�6
p
O
cz
s-:
'C3
C6 .� cz
�
ti V
G)
G
U
'7- O
w Ln
U N
.�-. w S.U.
-^
y-+
U
cz
O
cO
O c4
U
O
N
O
QsQ, .V
U
S-.
Q S-i
Ri U
( Cff
u
r
V F�
Ql
p cn
tz
75
O" M N
O
.�
vl
>O
CA
^O'
O O p
r-
E5 M
w v�
N
V
.r.
0
U
j
y
O C
.0
r6
+-'
2r, p C
Q.
U
O O
U LJ
O �= cJ
aCi
O
�_
'tS
.�
;O cn 0
r
~
'r
-�
�''
V
'L5 .F...
cn
O
c[S N
> O z..
�''
a-> 0..
� O.'
7�
O
S�
�
C.3 Cl u �.
U
v ,^..
R'
t4
�,
U cV
u
CL s.
O
N
E
�
tn
O
? Ste.
tt
z
O by
QJ
a�
_N
W
O
N
CD
N
c—I
CD
N
N
W
C�
a
C�
L.
Q3
Qa
C.7
d
N
O
N
C�
Sts
T—i 0
LO
co
E
co ca
tn
0
a-
th
O
bQ
Ln
O
O
M
O
CN
L.
cz
C)
C)
cn
Ln
t
CZ E
U
m r-
CN
LZ
Ln
fD.
E
CD
73
C)
7-
CD (D
C)
Ln cc
C5
LO
Qj u
0 CL)
"I
Ln
ct
cz C)
60
cD ci S3 U O O 6
Ln
fn,
cc
'C5 r— u 0 "
CZ
=
0
Ln Ln
TZ 0
cz
0 -a
�D- ,
cz
'n
u
:z
Ci
11
C) M
Iz ET
-C
iz
0
N c o tD. 0 — m u
r:L�
u 7�
by
00
O :57 >
O Ln (D
0 C)
CJ
c.
U
Ln
L-
VI
C)
LO
C)
tX
7:5
(4
ca
C a)
CJ b-0
N
to
cz
>1
O
Ct
u
Ln
Ln
CD ca (D
, ;�.
CL
r-
tZ
z 71
cz
(1)
t4
N
ter, O O
tx
to
=
E cz
to
-t4
C)
C:)
Ln
= —M
>
-1Z
C)
Lo
Ln
C)
a)
cu
C) t, a5
= = "
0 �D� —
u
Iz
U L�
r- m P
ct
:t�
Ln Co
:E
"7,
Q)
Cl.
14
C) m
ca Ln CO
m
Ln
o°
CN
I
C)
O
L
cz
cu
Z5
O
>
E
O
Ln
77
bQ
Ln
O
O
M
O
CN
L.
cz
E
'a
E
0
LO 0
Co
0
Q_
bA
O
i's
cu
O
a.
cQ
N
Ln
T1 y
N
ca
CD
cn a)
ZE a)
10
E
4-� OJ
c
CL Z
R
-=
Q. ;-.
6.. -
o
(D CD
to
U
�L
En
0
uu
aj
U� Ln
CL
cz
tio
w
( a
ca
H w
Ln
C) -
m
CIL
t10
>,
C) ::5 S
CZ
6 tc
W
Ln 1,
C) -r. _r_
Ln u
C:)
Ln
C)
Lr�
75
Lr)
N
bjO
in O
u "D E
C'Q
U cz
Ln
<
to
U
U cn t
V)
V) :j - O N
= —
0 CA �
0—CS -CS
ctY
Cl)
0
bO
0 — < u
taD
V)
C)
>
C)
M
t.0
L)
cz bz a)
C5
co
V)
V) -Z� "
0
Lr)
tL
c
>
In
Ln
cz
E
C)
cz
cz
cz
L)
co
L6
>
-0
CZ C)
CIO bn
E
0 a
U (D M
I--
CO
C)
u
Ln
CN
u
�7
0
bp
(A X�
0
1
0 2 aj " to
0
cz 0
m
cc
4
0
bz
S- a.)
w V)
n5 a)
L) CZ Ln
C)
cn
7:5
by
a 0 0
v ff C)
ro
(z
0
75
cz
-0 Q)
a)
72
cn
m
> L� W 2
tx
,7 -73
0 o
>
z,
u
S-
6
ri
tz
0
7:1
tc
CO
>
v) CZ
0)
tx
0
Ln
C-)
O
i's
cu
O
a.
cQ
E
in
in
LO
E
ca to
tD
0
CL
tD
1:
0
O
O
Ln
as
RS
cu
C)
Ri
ei
V5
U
C)
wl
u
m
a)
m
>
Ln
I bz
u
VI
cx
U 0�0 U 0
ILI
aj
-0 U
Q..
cz
bt u 'u ca
72
a) fn
0 a)
Ln C)
iii
CA
cz 'n
aj
CE
bjo
--I
m 01)
u > o
I u - C:I+
0 C)
a) C) 0 � � a,
m
aj
C) a
y
a)
•o
Co as as
"I Qj
U
m
LO
aj
Ln
V u
2 o u `n
cz
O
in
Ln
v) �: cn
7:3
Ln Ln
V
a) U C)
E
O
14
to
in
O,
un
CD u
ol
cn
W a
t7 cz as
'n
tio CD
to
(D
03
O
> C) tc
7;
co Q�
LO
C�
U
CL) o
a)
'D
In
cz ,
U
CD
�n.
C) ci
Cq
t
2
U
C)
w u
a,
C4
> tn'
m r- m
u
M ID
u
'IZI
O ° w U
O(D
O
C) Q. 0 u s
Ca a c
Ln
n m
Ln 00
7�
u
�' u
u cz
vii C�
z" -C - bp F, E,
0
w -05
r-
u G)
IZ
Z3
Q)
U >
� cn
C)
E
cc
U
Ln
cif cn
cz ca
M 81
m
w w 00 lu
aj
'C�
CIO
C) C) 5� :E r- CS
r �D.
U
C)
u CC to m
a)
CZ
0 V, bz
cn
a) u
a)
biO M C3 >
Ln
r,
u
Ln
cz
cz
cn
<
Cb (D
CT
O
O
Ln
as
RS
cu
C)
Ri
E
'a
T-i E
0
LO 0
O
,*I
T!
bD
cli
CD
C"i
CD
•
EM
CLS
75 �
CD
C-j
v
CQ
v5
CD
-4
tz
(D
>
N
N
=L
bO Ln
>
�
N X� 6 tap
cz
z-;
CL
C� Ln at
u
r-
t:,c
t)D
cD
aj no cu
T,
V)
cz
c,
cS
l
al
al o
v)
cz
C)
c-Q
u
°J x co
0
u
0
aj (D C:)
�7 " c:,
" - (D
ca (D
U
0 co cN
a) a) o cD c)
>
tic
r. m
r-L
c)
ca
-7p
75 Q.)
O
>
c) ca
L)
to
r-
(u
bz
-c�
O
co
N
r-,
N
c)
cz cu
-0 >
m
cz
c) C)
> a)
O
>
Ln <
oz
o—
In c)
-E —, w 0
a)
> >
>
U C) 0 0
u u m
a)
oj 0
u u
cn N
O
Ln
O
12
c)
LI)
CL
aj
t)-o
�7.
0
>
m
(D
>
N
>
cz
Cc)
4
u
r- N N
>
ct
N
cD Ln
a)
to
Q)
Ln
Q)
a)
>
CD
(U a)
v
LI)
C, 0
-CS
cz O
0 C:)
: 2
u cn
m
>
0 r"
r: cl,
N
In U
C)
7�
E
C)
u
m
C)
I- cD
0
1 —
(1) -
u
"I m
m
7R
> U s..
N X
> (D
w :t--�
w 0
an'
a)
w
ct
0 cu
rz,
C)
m w U
0
L)
w
v u
CD C)
cz
cz .= P
C)
r"
�
C)
7�
<
as
L)
<
bz
o w Ln
•
cz
bD
cli
CD
C"i
CD
•
EM
CLS
E
'a
Tq
LO
+
E
FCc Cc
bb
0
L1.
tD
.s
Ln
0
m:
ew
O
CV
O
O
rl-
C:)
O
Ln
CD
ID
>
ol
t4
-0
bn
CL)
C>11
>
m
-p
r— CJ
Ln
(D
0
C.�, Ln
cz
cc
U
g_—
ca
CD
U QJ Q)
cz
u
>
Ln (D
co
Cc
LO
cz
Ln
> cz
ca
-Cc,
LE. uc,
Ln
Cl
cz
>
u
C)
CD
cz C)
-�
0 cu
$7
m
Ln
bt
:::5
>
a)
m m
>
C) cr
cz
0
C)
m
0
m 0
Ln
> bio
u�
>
m
44 aj
lu
U
(D
O
M Uj
C,
cz
> a, bn
_0
C) f„ C)
7� 0 cn >
L'� Ln
'n C)
'S
>
Ln a)
cl
bi
0
ew
O
CV
O
O
rl-
C:)
E
U)
CL
E
0
tf9 Cy
E
0
a_
O
Q)
W
be
O
O
O
I
ca
(D
O
C:)
C)
TZ
CN
"t
Q) rq
C:)
C)
5., C)
— —
Ln
tc
Ln
u
tz ="z
tc
75
bz
tz
C)
0 r. (z
C) 0
a
73
V
N
'R w
O
x u
a)
Cs.
C)
tl-O cq
M
bL r
f:l, nb
0 7;
tB
cl� Q, 0
u
0
Ln
cL) —
cz
.
C) �7
Ln
ct
7�
cn
m �D.
cz
u u
N
-C� — -c
r-
E tic
0
=
0 >
tD
ct
cz cz
r-
c)
U tn
7�
Ln
cz
bZ
N
cz co
cz
c) v�
cz c)
Ln u
0 ,
cn
:� cj
Qj
c, Ij
7:i -C"-
::: —
(D >
c�
_r_ La. W
-0
ou
t:,C
u
cu
e-i
M
7�
r
C?
r,
0
c) a)
cn a) p.
t4
L"
C)
Ln
0 0 U
11
u LO
= a) C
—
. — Ln
>, 2
cz
Ln
U
u
:t C
(U
C) C) 0�
>
'� fn.
0 C)
4.
U.
Ln
bb
a)
7�
E ra
E "
cz
7O
cz c6
cz
C)
cz
>
Ln
>
ID Ln
>
C)
>
C)
cD
@ Z
7� �A 7�
C) Ln
b
N v)
6
C-)
cu 121
tl�
(U
7�
tic
m tic
C)
cD
a) cj Ln
m
7�
u
u
U
CL, m
^^, >
2
L',
>
Ln .2
U
Ln
-F
Ln
cu
C)
-E
')
>
ILI
C)
>
CL)
.2
>
0)
P� Ln ca n <
75
L) A. v�
cz a
u C) 5. t
tr
cu
"E;
0
Ln
>
cu
>
Q)
W
be
O
O
O
I
ca
(D
O
C:)
C:L
Tq E
0
LO U
+
cu cu
tLo
tz
O
0
Lo
C)
rZ
C)
.may.
O
biO
im" C O u CV
Cl) —
CD
L
o
>
2-
O
O
C)
bl 0
�> " to
7:3
nn
p 0 U
o
c —bz
.— " 0
cc 0� .7, �: Z
®
CL)
-:2 Ln cn
> = w
00
CD c o ° °
U = Ln cc
p
c 5: 11 "
u M
O en >
LV)
Ts tz
Q)
c C >
C) ub
OiD �z b.0 0 u C)
o
C) C,5 to C) t:,
Ln Q) a)
C:) V)
'n C13
0 >
C
vi' -C�
C) C) m m >
> W = = 2
ul M '
w E a tx
Lo �:5 bjD C) 75
cu C) p V� tA M
tA CLO
tn N ctS Iz CG C
CA
M LI) c
Ln
O. V)
L" U ta
cc ..O -
>
CD CU C)
115 c cz O C) -C.-
5 t)O ct
tl > m
z CD �7 M
C
E
U u u
.... ........ .. .
0) CZ)
W
bi
cz
CO C) " m
Qi
CL
T-i E
0
LO
cu
cu cu
bD
0
CL
tz
0
O
O
O
O
O
RS
QJ
C
N
C)
N
ctS
Cl
�
tJ
U
S
45 Er 0
u
0 50
O
u
cu
0
cz C
a)
CD
0
cz w C)
(1)
M tn
cq
(1)
E
U"
>,
Ln m
CD
m
Qj
tc
s::
0 bz
u
te
Z 0 cz
O
(D L')
O ct u
u I--
CU
CD u tn Q)
a
L,
cn
O
O
O
O
O
RS
QJ
C
N
C)
N
ctS
The eoas and polices contained in the Housing Element address Bodvvo Park's
identified housing needs and are implemented through a series of housing programs
offered through City departments, the Redevelopment Agency, and the Housing
Authority. Housing programs define the specific actions the City will undertake to
achieve specific goals and policies. According Lo Section 65583 of the Government
Code, Baldwin Park must make adequate provision for the housing needs of all
income levels by identify programs tndo all of the following:
4] Conserve the existing affordable housing stock;
B) Assist in the development of affordable housing;
Cl Provide adequate sites to achieve a variety and diversity o[housing;
D) Remove governmental constraints am necessary; and
E) Promote equal housing practices
Baldwin Park's housing plan for addressing unmet needs, removing constraints, and
achieving quantitative objectives is described in this section according to the above
five areas. The housing programs introduced on the following pages include
programs that are currently in operation and new programs which have been added
to address the City's unmet housing needs and changes to State laws. Quantified
objectives identified in particular programs are estimates of assistance the City will
be able to offer, subject to available financial and administrative resources,
r 1111111� IIII 11111 1111111 11111 11111,
Preserving the existing housing stock in Baldwin Park is a top priority for the City,
and maintaining the City's older neighborhoods bvital to conserving the overall
quality n[ housing io the community. The City supports neighborhood preservation
through code enforcement and housing rehabilitation programs, as well as first-time
homebuyer programs aimed at improving neighborhood stability and pride.
In addition to maintaining the existing housing stock Baldwin Park must also
conserve affordable units in the community, including the preservation of assisted
housing and rental subsidies.
Goal 1.0 Maintain and improve the quality of existing housing and
residential neighborhoods.
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-101 2014-2021 Housing Element
Policy 1.1 Encourage the ongoing maintenance and repair of owner-occupied
and rental housing to prevent deterioration of housing in the City.
Policy 1.2 Promote the rehabilitation of substandard and deteriorating housing
in areas designated for long term residential use. Promote efforts to
remove substandard units which cannot berehabilitated.
Policy 1.3 Provide focused code enforcement and rehabilitation efforts in
targeted neighborhoods to achieve substantive neighborhood
improvements.
Policy 1.4 Work to alleviate unit overcrowding by encouraging owners to add
bedrooms, baths, and additional living areas in existing homes. Offer
financial assistance for room additions to income-qualified
households.
Policy 1.5 Work to alleviate illegal conversions of garages and patios through
code enforcement, supported by rehabilitation assistance.
Policy 1.6 Cooperate with non-profit housing providers in the acquisition,
rehabilitation, and maintenance of older apartment complexes as
long-term affordable housing.
Policy 1.7 Preserve low-income housing io the City at risk of converting to
market rate by monitoring the status o[prc'payrueot eligible projects
and identifying financial and organizational resources available to
preserve these units.
This program is a continuation of a CDBG code enforcement program and works in
roo)uodiou with the low-interest Rehabilitation Loan Program and Street
Improvements Program. Deterioration and bUQbL can be significant problems in
low-income areas. Code enforcement is essential to ensuring housing conservation
and rehabilitation. The City's Community Improvement Program is both proactive
and reactive; concentrating efforts on reducing blighted conditions on major
thoroughfares and io commercial, industrial, and residential areas,
• Continue to provide proactive code enforcement activities to maintain and
improve housing and neighborhood conditions, qualities, standards, and
property values.
• Concentrate efforts on removing blighted conditions from specific areas, such
as areas north of Ramona near Maine Avenue and in the southwestern
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-102 2014-2021 Housing Element
section near the freeways, through the eofbocc/oeut of ododnu building
codes.
Timeframe: Ongoing
Responsible Agency: Community Development Department, Code Enforcement
Division
Funding Sources Departmental Budget; CD8[fuodo
The goal of this program is to offer residents an opportunity to live in o safe
oovinounoeut by offering rehabilitation assistance to low- and moderate-income
single-family households. Three programs are included under the Housing
Improvement Residential Program, which provide amortized loans, deferred loans,
and grants. The Amortized Loan Program provides for substantial rehabilitation
through loans of up to $45,000 at a three percent interest rate for a roaxirounu term
ofZOyears. The Deferred Loan Program provides loans up to $45,000 (at oone
percent interest rate for 30 years orat the time the borno is sold or becomes a rental
property) for substantial rehabilitation to ez1roone|y low-, very low-, and low-
income households, seniors, and handicapped or disabled residents. The Residential
Rehabilitation Grants provides grants of up to $I0,000 to seniors, disabled, and
extremely low- and very low-income households.
• Rehabilitate owner-occupied housing units to remove substandard
conditions.
• Provide low interest and deferred loans and grants to lower-income families,
with a goal of providing assistance to 24 households per year, providing
assistance to a total of 192 households during the 2014-2021 planning cycle.
Prioritize grants for extremely }ovv-incnnnc households, with a goal of
providing grants to at least Z extremely low-income households (of the 24
total households Per year), if applications from eligible extremely low-
income households are submitted,
• Continue to provide assistance through 0lDP for the construction of
bedroom additions to ameliorate overcrowding conditions. Continue to
provide assistance through HIRP for home improvements that provide access
and safety for disabled residents.
• Continue to provide information on HIRP at public counters and on the City's
vvobsite. Encourage use of the program to eligible residents who visit the
planning department for permits or technical assistance on other types of
renovations nrremodels.
7imeframe: Ongoing
Responsible Agency: Community Development Department, Housing Division
Baldwin Park ZO3O General Plan BE-103 2014-2021 Housing Element
Funding Sources: CDBG; HOME, CalHOME
The goal of this program istoimprove the City's multifamily rental housing stock
while contributing to safe, decent, and sanitary living ' unvimoments. This program
focuses on investor-owned multi-family rental properties that can be renovated at a
modest price. Amortized loans at three percent interest rates are provided
contingent on the property owner maintaining 51 percent of the ccoLal units
affordable for the life of the 2O'yearloan.
m Rehabilitate J )ovv and moderate-income units anuualky, for a total of 36
during the 2Ol4-ZU2l planning cycle.
7imehr me: Provide loans annually t: qualifying applicants asapplications
are received
Responsible Agency: Community Development Department, Housing Division
Funding Sources: CD8C
Over the next 10 years C2013-2023l, four federally assisted housing projects that
provide 222 affordable units have expiring Section 8 contracts. These projects -
Clark Terrace, Frazier Park, Ramona Park, and Syracuse Park- are owned by for-
profit corporations, and as such are considered at high risk of conversion. While the
owners have reonvvod the 3ocboo 8 contracts in the past (three of these projects
were all at-risk during the last planning cycle), it is Vokoovvn at this time whether
the owners will continue to renew their Section 9 contracts in the future.
�
Monitor the status of the 222 affordable housing units that are at risk of
converting to market rate,
m
Work with owners and property managers to discuss preservation options of
affordable housing units ot risk of converting to market rate.
�
Monitor Section 8 legislation and provide technical assistance to property
owners aonecessary,
�
Inform non-profit housing organizations of opportunities to acquire and
continue affordability o[ at-risk units.
�
Inform residents in units that are converting to market rents of affordable
housing programs available in the City, including Section 8 and other
affordable housing developments.
Baldwin Park 2OZO General Plan 8E-104 2014-2021 Housing E)ccoeot
limcframe: Monitor the status of at-risk units annually; inform residents
and potential non-profit housing organizations upon learning
Vf pending conversion.
Responsible Agency: Community Development Department, Housing Division
Funding Sources: CDBC;HO0YB
Baldwin Park encourages the development of housing units affordable to all
segments of the community. However, the cost of new construction can be
prohibitive to the development of affordable housing. Incentive programs, such as
density bonuses and assistance with land assembly, offer cost-effective nuzaos of
providing affordable housing development. In addition, the Housing Element sets
forth several first-time booncbuycr programs aimed at moving renters into
homeownership and promoting neighborhood stability.
Goal 2.0 Assist in the development of housing affordable to low- and
moderate- income households.
Policy 2.1 Provide favorable bon)c purchasing options to }nvvapiucoouc
households,
Policy 2.2 Encourage developers of for-sale housing to utilize the City's first-time
homebuyer assistance program to qualify for lower income applicants.
Policy 2.3 Continue to provide rental assistance Lo very low-income households
who are overpaying for housing.
Policy 2.4 Offer financial and/or regulatory incentives vvbenc feasible to
encourage the development of affordable housing.
Policy 2.5 Assist residential developers in identifying and consolidating parcels
suitable for new housing development.
Policy 2.6 Actively pursue additional sources of funds for affordable housing
The Baldwin Park First-Time Bnru Program encourages the transition oflow-
and moderate-income renters into long-term homeownership. The Boroobuyer
Program provides low-income households the opportunity to purchase a home
through the use of gap financing and down payment assistance. Both new and
existing housing within established rnaxicnucn purchase prices are eligible. The
City's First-Time Bonucbuyer Program provides funds for low-income boouebuyers
to complete the difference between the sales price and the qualifying price up to
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-105 2014-2021 Housing Element
$70,000 through a second mortgage subordinate to the first roortgagr. At a
minimum, the prospective borucboyoris required to contribute 1.5 percent for the
purchase price as the down payment and pay all closing costs.
• Expand home-ownership opportunities tn low- and moderate-income first-
time honzcbuyecs.
• Provide homeownership assistance to 3 households annually, for a total of 24
households during the 2O24-ZO2I planning period.
Timrbrame: Ongoing^�
Responsible Agency: Community Development Department, Housing Division
Funding Sources: HOME
As a means offurther leveraging homeownership assistance, the City participates
with the Los Angeles County Cnonrnuohn Development Commission (CDC) in
innp|000eotetino of Mortgage Credit Certificate Program. An MCC is o certificate
awarded by the CDC authorizing the holder to take a federal income tax credit. A
qualified applicant awarded an MCC may take an annual credit against federal
income taxes of up to 20 percent of the annual interest paid on the applicant's
mortgage. This allows more available income to qualify for a mortgage loan and to
make the monthly mortgage payments. The value of the MCC must be 1aboo into
consideration by the mortgage lender in underwriting the loan and may be used to
adjust the borrower's federal income tax withholding,
�
Continue to participate in the regional MCC program, and encourage
applicants to City's first-time borucbuycr program to take advantage of the
7irnpfranue: Ongoing
Responsible Agency: Community Development Commission of the County of Lon
Angeles; Community Development Department, Housing
Division
Funding Sources: Federal Income Tax Credit
The Section 8 Rousing Choice Voucher Program extends rental subsidies to
exLrcozch/ low-income, very low-income, elderly, and disabled households who
spend more than 30 percent of their gross income on housing. Participants are able
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-106 2014-2021 Housing Element
to select any housing that meets the requirements of the program, and are not
limited to units located in subsidized housing projects. The program is funded by
HUD, and the Baldwin Park Housing Authority coordinates the program for Baldwin
Park residents. As of October 2012, SSO Baldwin Park households received Section 8
Housing Choice vouchers, and Z50 applicants were oo the waiting list.
• Participate in efforts to maintain, and possibly to increase, the current
number of Housing Choice Vouchers available to Baldwin Park residents, and
direct eligible households to the program.
• Encourage apartment owners t0 list their properties with the Baldwin Park
Housing Authority as eligible to receive Section 8tenants.
= Provide priority assistance to displaced households, households residing in
substandard housing, and households spending greater than 50 percent of
their income oo housing costs.
7iooebraune: Ongoing
Responsible Agency: Baldwin Park Housing Authority
Funding Sources: HUD Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program
III IN, ir
This program addresses housing and affordability and alleviates overcrowding by
expanding housing choice. The Tenant-Based Rental Assistance Program directly
assists individual low-income households by paying the difference between actual
housing costs and what a household can afford to pay. Tenants are free to select any
standard unit, whether or not dio HOME assisted.
� Provide rental assistance to 8 households per year that are currently on the
Scrhoo 8 waiting list. Prioritize assistance to extremely low-income
households.
TbueD�one: Ongoing
Responsible Agency: Community Development Department, Housing Division
Funding Sources: HOME
For-profit and non-profit developers play a significant role in providing affordable
housing. The City can assist in the provision of affordable housing through the
utilization of CDBG and HOME funds to write down the cost of land for development
of affordable housing. As part of the land write-down program, the City may also
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-107 2014-2021 Housing Element
assist in the acquiring and assembling property and in subsidizing ' on- and off-site
improvements.
• Continue to provide financial and regulatory incentives to increase the
supply of affordable housing, Provide technical and financial (as available)
assistance for the development of 20 new affordable housing units during the
2014-2021 Housing Element period using a combination of federal, state, and
local funds to provide land cost write-downs and other construction
assistance. Continue to meet with nonprofit developers to explore
partnerships oua regular basis.
• Assist developers in the uosucub)aAe of property and, as appropriate and
necessary, provide land write-downs for affordable housing developments.
• Provide technical assistance to developers to acquire and assemble
properties for affordable housing development.
• Focus a portion of assistance toward development projects that meet the
needs of extremely low-, very low-, and low-income renters and large
7imeframc: Ongoing; meet with nonprofit developers a1 least every other
your.
Responsible Agency: Community Development Department, Planning Division
Funding Sources: CDBC;BOME
C. Provide Adequate Sites to Achieve a Variety and Diversity
of Housing
/\ key dennoot to satisfying the housing needs of all segments of the community is
the provision of adequate sites for all types, sizes, and prices of housing. The City,
through the General Plan land use policies and the Zoning Code, is responsible for
ensuring adequate sites to accommodate its regional fair share of housing growth,
and facilitates the development of affordable housing through regulatory and
financial incentives.
Goal 3.0 Provide adequate residential sites through appropriate land use
and zoning designations to accommodate the City's regional
share of housing needs.
Policy 3.1 Provide for a range of residential development types in Baldwin Park,
including \ovv deoakn single-family homes, small lot single-family
subdivisions, medium-density tovvobonaes, and higher-density
apartments and condominiums.
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-108 2014-2021 Housing Element
Policy 32 Implement the Land Use Element, and facilitate development of
mixed-use residential projects near Downtown and along North Maine
Avenue.
Policy 3.3 Maintain consistency between General Plan land use policies and the
Zoning Code.
Policy 3.4 Continue to provide opportunities for iofU] housing development hzB,
3zonasaodioMixed-Usrarcas.
Policy 3.5 Promote mixed-use and higher-density housing in close proximity to
commercial areas and transportation routes for accessibility to
services.
Policy 3.6 Continue to encourage second units on single-family lots.
Program 10: Ensure Adequate Sites to Accommodate Regional Fair
Share of Housing Growth
As part of the 2OUO-2UI4 Housing Element update, a vacant and underutilized sites
analysis was performed. The analysis evaluated the development potential in the R-
3 zoneandioK4ixcd'Uscureas.Siorz000coftbeidentifiedsitesbasbocudwveloyud
as of the date of this current housing c|ocncot, the results of this analysis illustrate
that Baldwin Park has adequate sites to accommodate its share of regional housing
needs for the 2Ol4-2O2l Housing Element cycle.
VVbUc the City experienced limited housing unit growth during the past Housing
Element cycle, attributable to the economic downturn that began in 2007, regional
growth pressures and regional growth policies focused on providing opportunities
for new housing in urban Los Angeles County communities like Baldwin Park means
that local land use policy will need to continue to accommodate applications for
housing development through the next decade. The Housing Element represents the
City's efforts to provide housing opportunities for all segments of the community.
Objectives:
• Continue to provide appropriate land use designations and maintain an
inventory of suitable sites for residential development,
• Make the vacant and underutilized residential sites inventory available to
non-profit and for-profit housing developers ou the City's vveboite.
7lonefraoue: Ongoing; update sites inventory every two years asneeded
Responsible Agency: Community Development Department, Planning Division
Funding Sources: Departmental Budget
Baldwin Park 2O2U General Plan 8E-109 2014-2U2l Housing Element
Mixed-use development will add more residential uodo in the downtown area and
along Maine Avenue. Such development is expected to enhance the market for
downtown businesses and provide significant opportunities for affordable housing
development. Elderly, less-mobile residents, as well as employees of nearby
businesses will particularly benefit from such opportunities. The sites inventory
indicates a potential for 774 new residential units in mixed-use areas. The City's
development standards encourage the development of mixed-use in these areas and
interest ar000Q developers to rocop|cto such projects vviLbio Baldwin Park is high.
�
Continue to facilitate the construction of residences in mixed-use
developments.
=
Continue to provide incentives for lot consolidation in the MU-2 zone through
the use of graduated density zoning.
=
Provide technical assistance for interested developers, including land
development counseling by City planners, and the facilitation o[negotiations
between property owners to encourage lot consolidation.
�
Continue to monitor development interest, inquiries and, progress towards
mixed-use development. Periodically re-evaluate approach and progress.
Timeframc Ongoing; re-evaluate approach and progress annually.
Responsible Agency: Community Development Department, Planning Division
Funding Sources: Departmental Budget
Market and governmental factors pose constraints to the provision of adequate and
affordable housing, Factors that pose constraints on the provision of housing
include the coots of developing both ownership and rental housing, which are
ultimately passed to the consumers; the availability and cost of mortgage and
rehabilitation financing; and restrictive zoning or other development regulations.
These factors tend to disproportionately impact lower- and moderate-income
households due to their limited resources for absorbing the costs. To assist in
affordable housing development, Baldwin Park addresses, and where legally
possible, removes governmental constraints affecting the maintenance,
improvement, and development of housing. The City is committed to removing
governmental constraints that hinder the production of housing. In addition to the
density bonuses and flexible development standards already in place, the Zoning
Code encourages housing opportunities for extremely low-income households and
special needs persons, consistent with State law.
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-110 2014-2021 Housing Element
Policy 4.1 Periodically review City regulations, ordinances, departmental
processing procedures and residential fees related to rehabilitation
and/or construction to assess their impact on housing costs, and
revise as appropriate.
Policy 4.2 Continue to utilize density bonus incentives to encourage market rate
developments to integrate units affordable to lower income
households.
Policy 4.3 Continue to utilize the Specific Plan process as a means of providing
flexible development standards for affordable housing development.
Policy 4.4 Continue to utilize the Administrative Adjustment Process and
concurrent review process as a means of streamlining development
review procedures.
Policy 4.5 Designate appropriate zoning districts for the location of transitional
housing and emergency shelters, and maintain standards to enhance
the compatibility of these uses with the surrounding neighborhood.
Program 12: Land Use ControE
The Housing Element looks to provide flexibility in residential development
standards as a means of reducing the costs of development, thus enhancing unit
affordability. The City will continue to utilize the Administrative Adjustment and
Specific Plan processes to provide flexibility in height, setback, open space, and
parking requirements.
Provide flexibility in development standards such as open space, parking,
setback and height limits through the Administrative Adjustment and
Specific Plan processes.
Timeframe: Ongoing
Responsible Agency: Community Development Department, Planning Division
Funding Sources: Departmental Budget
MMINOMMMM
Density bonuses are granted in Baldwin Park if a development meets California
Government Code Section 65915. Pursuant to State law, the City offers density
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-111 2014-2021 Housing Element
bonuses of between %O and 35 percent for the provision of affordable housing,
depending on the amount and typo of housing provided. Financial incentives or
regulatory concessions may also be granted when a developer proposes to construct
affordable housing.
• Continue to comply with State law provisions for density bonuses as a means
to facilitate affordable housing development.
• Continue to exempt affordable housing projects from certain development
fees, such as Quimby and public art fees.
7lnoofraoze: Ongoing
Responsible Agency: Community Development Department, Planning Division
Funding Sources: Departmental Budget
A community's evaluation and review process for housing projects contributes to
the cost of housing because holding costs incurred by developers are u|dnnate|v
reflected in the unit's selling price. The City provides expeditious processing, which
includes pre-submittal multi-departmental roccdog with the project applicant to
help guide the applicant through the process; concurrent processing of applications;
and priority scheduling of affordable housing projects for public hearings.
Objectives:
• Minimize the time required for project approvals, and provide fast track
permit processing for projects with ao affordable component.
• Develop a process for concurrent processing of residential projects, and
priority processing for affordable housing developments,
Tiznefraruc: Ongoing; develop concurrent process 6n December 20l3
Responsible Agency: Community Development Department, Planning Division
Funding Sources: Departmental Budget
III IIIIIIIIII 111 111111111 OWN 111 111 111111 1 1.111111; 111,
Extremely |ovvbucunoo households and households with special needs, including
persons with developmental disabilities, have limited housing options in Baldwin
Park Housing types appropriate for these groups include: emergency shelters,
transitional housing, supportive housing, and single-room occupancy (SRO) units.
As part of the comprehensive Zoning Code update completed in 2012, the I-C zone
was modified to permit emergency housing byright. Specific siting standards and
�
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-112 2014-202I Housing Element
conditions for approval were developed to better facilitate the provision of
emergency housing.
• Continue to recognize housing opportunities for czLrennek/ low-income
persons hn allowing emergency shelters by right io the l-C zone, subject to
those conditions and standards as consistent with State law. Subject
emergency shelters to the same development standards as other similar uses
within the {-C zone, except for those provisions permitted by State law and
included iu the Baldwin Park Zoning Code for emergency shelters.
• Continue to allow the establishment 0[ transitional and supportive housing
that function as residential uses, consistent with similar residential uses and
pursuant to3B 2.
• Review the Zoning Code Lo ensure compliance with State law related to
zoning for transitional and supportive housing. As needed, modify zoning to
be in compliance with SB 2 to permit transitional and supportive housing, as
defined io Housing Element Law, io zones allowing residential uses asa
residential use of property, subject only to those restrictions that apply to
other residential dwellings of the same type io the same zone.
• Prioritize projects that include special needs housing or housing for
extremely/very low-income households in the development application
review process.
• Seek State and federal funds, as they may become available, for the support
nf housing construction and rehabilitation for persons with disabilities,
including persons with developmental disabilities.
• Meet with developers of supportive housing ao requested to help them
understand how housing for persons with disabilities, including
developmental disabilities, can best be constructed in Baldwin Park.
• Work with the San Gabriel/Pomona Regional Center to implement ao
outreach program informing families within the City of housing and services
available to persons with developmental disabilities. Make such information
available on the City's website and as printed information at appropriate
locations in the City.
7`imobanue: Ongoing for emergency shelters, funding, and meetings with
developers.
Review and revise, as needed, the %noiog Code within Z years
of Housing Element adoption,
Develop an outreach program with the Regional Center by
2014.
Responsible Agency: CoruozuoityDeve}opozentDupartonont - Planning Division
Funding Sources: Departmental Budget
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan 8E-I13 Z014_3U21 Housing Element
In accordance with Government Code Section 055897 as revised in 2085,
irncomdia1c|v following City Council adoption, the City must deliver to all public
agencies or private entities that provide water or sewer services to properties
within Baldwin Park a copy of the 2OI4-2O21Housing Element.
� |rnnuediaLmk/ following adoption, deliver the 20I4'2031 8a]dmdo Park
Housing Blco)cut to all providers of sewer and water service within the City
Uf Baldwin Park.
Tlnnoframo: Within 3O days ofadoption
Responsible Agency: Community Development Department, Planning Division
Funding Sources: Department Budget
To fully meet the community's housing needs, Baldwin Park must ensure that
housing is accessible to all residents, regardless of race, religion, family status, age,
or physical disability. Baldwin Park contracts with the Housing Rights Center to
provide fair housing services. Activities to support fair housing practices include
tenant/landlord activities such as mediation, information, investigation, counseling,
and referral services.
Policy 5.1 Continue to enforce fair housing laws prohibiting arbitrary
discrimination io the building, financing, selling, or renting ofhousing
on the basis of race, religion, [acoi|n status, national origin, physical
handicap or other such characteristics,
Policy 5.2 Continue to offer fair housing services to residents, including
tenant/landlord dispute resolution and discrimination complaint
investigation.
Policy 5.3 Provide that displacement oflow-income households is avoided uoci
where necessary, is carried out in an equitable manner.
Policy 5.4 Require o)obUc home and trailer pack owners proposing park
closures toadhere to State relocation requirements.
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-114 2014-2021 Housing Element
Policy 5.5 Encourage housing construction or alteration to meet the needs of
residents with special needs such as the elderly, disabled, and
developmentally disabled.
The City contracts with the Housing Rights Center to provide fair housing services to
renters and purchasers of housing in Baldwin Park Services include housing
discrimination response, landlord-tenant relations, and housing information
c000so|ioA
• Continue to assist households through the Housing Rights Center, providing
fair housing services and educational programs concerning fair housing
issues. Refer fair housing complaints to the Housing Rights Center and assist
io program outreach.
• Continue to support distribution of fair housing material and information
throughout the City 6vthe Housing Rights Center. Provide iofbnnabou on
fair housing resources on the City'svvebsitr.
• Continue to comply with all State and federal fair housing requirements
when icop1cozonbng housing programs or delivering housing-related
services.
• lnop|ororot recommendations from 20I0 Analysis of Impediments to Pair
Housing Choice related to fair housing.
7ioloframc: Ongoing
Responsible Agency: Community Development Department, Housing Division
Funding Sources: CDBG
The Fair Housing Act, as amended in1988, requires that cities and counties provide
reasonable accommodation to rules, policies, practices, and procedures where such
accommodation may be necessary to afford individuals with disabilities equal
housing opportunities. VVbilc fair housing laws intend for all people have equal
access to housing, the law also recognizes that people with disabilities may need
extra tools to achieve equality, Reasonable accommodation is one of the tools
intended to further housing opportunities for people with disabilities. Reasonable
accommodation provides a means of requesting from the local government
flexibility in the application of land use and zoning regulations or, in some instances,
even o waiver of certain restrictions or requirements because it is necessary to
achieve equal access to housing. Cities and counties are required to consider
requests for accommodations related to housing for people with disabilities and
provide the accommodation when it is determined to be "reasonable" based on fair
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-115 2014-2021 Housing Element
housing laws and case law interpreting the statutes. Baldwin Park has a reasonable
�
Provide information tn residents no reasonable accommodation procedures
via public counters and the City website.
]`imchamc: Ongoing
Responsible Agency: Community Development Department, Planning Division
Funding Sources: Departmental Budget
F. Ensure Compliance with Applicable Environmental
Regulations
In response to statewide concerns regarding water quality and flooding issues, in
recent years the State Legislature has adopted laws that require these issues to be
addressed as part of jurisdiction's General Plan update. Because the Housing
Elecnco1 is the cicrneot most b-ogueody updated, the laws cite Housing B|erncnt
updates in particular as the trigger point for dealing with water quality and flood
control issues.
With regard to water quality and compliance with State Regional Water Quality
Control Board requirements, Baldwin Park is a co-permittee under the Los Angeles
County National Pollution Discharge Elimination System [yJPDE3) permit. The
terms of the permit require that:
� Each Pmrmbtec shall amend, revise, or update its General Plan to include
watershed and storm water quality and quantity management considerations
and policies when any of the following General Plan elements are updated or
amended: U\ Land Use, (ii) Housing, (iii) Conservation, and (iv) Open Space.
=
Each Pcrmittee shall provide the Regional Board with the draft amendment or
revision when a listed G000cs| Plan e)concot or the Ceoeod Plan in noticed for
comment in accordance with Cal. Govt. Code 66S350ctseq.
Baldwin Park completed a comprehensive General Plan update ioZQO2. The Open
Space and Conservation Element includes policies that address protection of water
resources from pollution, Goal S and accompanying policies 5.4 and 5.5 are
incorporated into this Element by reference.
AB 162, signed into law bv Governor 3rbvvarzenoggerio 2007, requires cities and
counties to increase consideration of flood risks when making land use decisions.
The bill requires:
Baldwin Park Z02O General Plan DE-116 2U14'2U2I Housing Element
� Upon the next revision of the housing cloo\rotoo or after January 1' 2009, the
conservation c)ernznt shall identify rivers, creeks, streams, flood corridors,
riparian habitats, and land that may accommodate floodwater for purposes of
groundwater recharge and storm water management.
�
The safety element, upon the next revision of the housing c)enneot on or after
January 1, 2009, shall also do the following:
Identify information regarding flood hazards, including, but not limited to
flood hazard zones, National Flood Insurance Program maps published by
FBK4A, information about flood hazards, designated Ooodvvay maps, dam
failure inundation maps, areas subject to iouodxduo in the event of the
failure of levees or Ooodvva|ln, and other flood-related issues. [Coverorucut
Code Section 65302.g.2./l provides the complete list]
ii Establish a set of comprehensive goab, policies, and objectives for the
protection of the community from the unreasonable risks of flooding.
As part of the 2002 Genera) Plan update, the City prepared a new Public Safety
Element that addressed flooding. The Element states that federal flood maps
<FlBK0l designate all of Baldwin Park as Area C, oumaoiog that rnioicoaJ flood risks
exist in the City. Goal 2.0 and the accompanying policies in the Public Safety
Element are incorporated into this Housing Element byreference.
Table H-52 summarizes the City's quantified objectives for the 2014-2021 planning
period by income group.
• Construction of S57 new units, representing the City's 8DRA for the 2014—
3021 period, including 142 units for extremely low-/very low-income
households, 83 units for low-income households, 90 units for moderate-
income households, and 242 for above-moderate income households,
• Rehabilitation ofl9Z owner-occupied units during the planning period.
• Rehabilitation of 16 low- and moderate-income rental units during the 3014-
ZOZI planning cycle.
• Conservation of 222 affordable units at risk of conversion to market-rate
Baldwin Park ZU%0 General Plan f{E-117 2014-2021 Housing Element
Table H-52
Summary of2O14-2O21 Quantified Objectives
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-118 2014-2021 Housing Element
Income Level
Extremely
Very
Above
Low.
Low
Low
Moderate
Moderate
Total
1 Construction
Objective (RHNA)
142
83
90
242
557
Rehabilitation
192
192
Rental
Rehabilitation
8
8
16
At-Risk Units
Conservation
222
222
Objective
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan HE-118 2014-2021 Housing Element
0
Baldwin Park Housing Elemen
Appendix A
Qualified Agencies Interested in Purchasing At-Risk Projects
T
� C
.-
m -
C (p >
C N m 3 C m L ? m d
O O_
m m °i L m m >" N O C m "O m> � N U y C y y L d T m m O L C 7 U
FN C m C A m m C 3 m C¢ C C 3 0 m N
J 9 a J C° w m a m Q 3 O O C C, O N m
T 3 L
o N o a� U
O N E
U C7 U LL ¢ W -, (7 Y¢ m m -� t- U U CD m m U` -, Z U Y¢ i- ¢ w W 2 co I-- U U ¢ S'
M
X (p
M O
C
X
(0 r r r 0 0 0 0 0 0 (O D7
co fl
O) N N N O
O (O N W M T O
3 r� V N� (�- M M M r N Oi 1� c-
z
y
SL O
¢ O r r (O N N
� a L :� � °' C�
O t
O
J O 7 41 N O V O N
47 O m r r
¢ O O OS m O O O) m O � O O Q1 D7 61 Q7 d) d)
U) �
Z 61
W
w ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ > ¢ ¢
c:1lU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U z U O
w
O
LD
= r o
w U L L O> (q .0 C > ¢ U
o o U 0 0 o m o o s o a m o 9_
U) L O N m N N U1 N y O O O N N �! N N m a a LL •-
c N m o m °� m m u 6 m u c ? c c 'u . F m o Q m 'U a� °� o y U o Q ° v
EL- Z m a° -°° ai m a� .0 U .� i m Y 0 U m m c o m c m � c� o c� m m� __ c m
U) L m m c Q 1 p L w m Q fl- LL °a W m 'mo a� m m ti (¢ c ti Q m 0 E m N m ti Q m 0=
m c> z c 3 c m o '
Z W p m c 0 m m m m -Z p m m m m m p m L (� m m m m o o m Z m c o m (6 m m m p
V J O U) W J d w U) U) U) J Z U) Z co co > CD U co co U) U) W cn J O U) U) J U) �- U) w J 1- U) U) U U) U) J Z w U)
Q W c
w -
J O
G
Cl)
E 2 °
as U) : w W U) 0 O t
Ej
Q) 2 U) Q j m p U t m 'O O W m O co t D ) O W O > m m
¢ > a m p > o � U) o > m m U T F C7 Q p U uc m ¢ > c m m > m ¢ jE
> 1 m o o a d "w O w "� o a) o U) o o ¢ f—
F o m o U m
m N a) m E O O r >O X m r U z o ¢ 0 m m m w m U m w o O m o M S w o f CL N W Z o - .
D R O _ .E c � U) m ) O
Z - m W O U M O m U) O W m O U U) a 0 r n s Q O m M t tm 0 0
U) w d O 0 0 m M 7 t M 0 O U M r N M Cr M (O M N M 0 h �o m rn
wa oa
w U �
z_
m a
w
LZ
z
z
w
4
x
J U
C D C J C
m ° a °- O c E o U
¢ U O° O O N O C
N N U O> O O Q m 01 C Ci d
_m U C C O C T T T �- p` Q - C E
J EN m U U U O an d O> 01
O C C C C U O
7ff O J C m N O m ° m N && OS O. C O U O C V (/ = U �- U
V U m > o E y m¢¢ ¢ :c m� a_ c c o .� c o o ° c
_ C N o J J c m e m m m i N '� C E ci S S _ O m
E UI J J N @ O m '� w C m C C C C Q C N 6 O a J O-
m E m m Ui N W U C a. > w m m m m 0 m N S- J _ U O Q m C p O
E n° E Q m J 'N m m> c c c_ > U 2- E¢ m o E m J a m m E _ U
O.. c O C 0 ._ J U ° m O .0 LL W W d m O O_ co a m 0 C W C O C 1 O 'O
C �` [6 O C U Q N C N m Q O
> E a>i m E m "' _- c s 0- o c c c c c m m m F� E w� ti m c E E
m m E E U w c N o= E E N y y N m E c> c a m o d E m¢¢ c> E m u Q m
c m o o w 5 E E m m m "� m m a m E E c 0 c E u .N m o 0 0 .N c.� o m a .a m m m n w o n
m 0 0 0) -° m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 S S `o m m m o o m y p p- o
m U U E s = m o U U U S 2 2 S= c o y w 2 0 =° ° v° o>i Q d U c c Y m o a > =o
(0 (p m O C C -O ¢ C w UJ w m m L m m m m m m m m T C C C S N❑ U rA !/ w Y a O m m m Y m
c m w m a a U U m O°- "6 J O m J C C C C C C C C m 3 m> y C O-0 'B Q (6 R U S y U a
m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �+ m E E E O '- y - -� p m -O a Q c- a m t C
w W o m L m m m > ° m o a n-- - - - - -- m N E E E° m 3 E_ v m t o w E E J s L
w= a E E E m m m' m m m m m m m m m L 0 0 0 0° m o¢ m n m m o 0 0 m m w m m'w
O M¢¢¢¢¢¢¢ m m m m m m m m U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U O O O w w W W W L W CJ CD = S S S= s -0
O
O
W W W W W W U) W W W W W W W W m W W W W W W W U} U) W U) U) m W U) U) U) U) U) UI V) U) U) W U) W U) U) m w w w w w w o
W w W W_ W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W -6
Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z
S Z Z S S Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z S Z Z Z S S 7 S Z Z S Z Z Z Z Z Z Z S Z Z S S S S Z Z Z Z Z Z S Z Z S Z Z Z
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U
.1-..<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J
J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J
a
a
° N N
c c
T m r
J1
O d C
O N C
c y. c
o c 0 6 T v E o y-
m o m cv°,' in
ao o U (`a a o w S F O u U m
m o w w o
- v a c
u)
a o
° O J E :5 0 O m O m U m m n ) a ° Y io m S 0 U U UY C m
o
U U
0
0
(n (n 0 w 0 UI 0 U 0 0 co 0 w w 0 0 w (n (n U w w 0 0 0 0 U w w 0 (n U) m 0 W 0 0 W W m 0 W W n n n n n n V Oa
W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W _W W W W W W W W W W W W W _w W W W W W w w W W W W W W w w W W W W W w O-
F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F J J J J J J J J L
Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z W W W W W W w W
>>>> Q>>>> Q D Q Q Q D D D Q Q Q>>>> n U D Q D>> Q Q>>> Q D D Q Q Q Q O O 0 0 0 0 0 0
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000ZZZZZZZZ
c U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U Q Q Q Q Q 4 Q Q
O J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
U Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q C Q Q Q Q Q Q G Q Q Q C Q Q S Q F Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q J J J J J J J J
N
� N
x
X X
M
rn co rn O m r
O N m O rn V' O N N r rn N O O to O m CO rn t(y (V r m
z N m N M r M
r M Cp m� �- O N Q h ti M CO N N N M ifl I� Cp (7 to N O N CO M tp N m
o rn
ty, t0
2i
O
6S
a. v m m d' v d'
m L2 O N d' M 6t O V O rn rn f� �.n m rn m 6Y m V M m 0 to G O O N
c0
O
CL
N O N N N M M N
O O O m m 0 r m m V N •- �1 7 h O m r h r h �O M rn (n to r M r O N M O O M i-a V rn p (- (O
a
m m M M r N O
N N h to (O N N (D Cn
J
Q
Cn
N O r r .y' O rn
m rn m m m m m
M M r V N O N N �' C N
c v rn rn m m rn rn rn rn rn m m rn rn rn m m rn m m rn rn rn rn m rn rn rn rn rn rn rn m m rn rn rn rn w m
�
N
(R
a
W
F- Q Q Q Q Q O> C Q
S S Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q 2 C Q Q a Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q 4 Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
�
i
�UUUUUUZUUODUUUUUUUUUUUUU
oUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
0
M
=
z
r
(D r
c
o
E v v u
p
F ro
o a
m o c .0
o o o o
aai m a .v n °�
LL=
- 2
coo
N N QI i N
N m m m o o o a a� o o °� m a° °J
S] .Q O O m U E N N J @ l4 'C N O@ m N m (6 N a) - o
= E
u)
Q
d m m Q W> �-
C
co
E cLi c m L E �- c m ('- s n ti m y o Q W >, Q 6 a>i Q I.i Q o< L asi m Q Q
d
LLI
y C C C
N O O m N O] m
U Z U (� Q S U)
G C C C C C C N (n = = (O N
O O m> m m U} w m N (q m m m O m m m O° > m C o O
a J}
D
J J
U U S a Z> d? U) m F Z U1 O> Z co U) U) J U) U1 Cn u) U) (n J Z W Q U U
O Q
o m
} 'E
-� O
o O O (° � o o
s a
U
o o
LL N �i a o op o rn
r O
O U
Z
LL
_� 65 W
Z Z
N O a a
O
> O S a d N >� ° - (U O N m _ -
`� LL�> O
L N
Q
Q W
O O
w
.� a' U)
U
> U) (n
O QCy N Q N m .o
Q` O>° m cb -6>
S
O o
U 0
m
N¢ � N a T N L O r a> U o o U N S O x
C U > U1 C
F C7
�-^
0
m m U
C N N C C O.
C C C N .0 J E L C O N i m C ` a m
m m N m C m a E> d J O N M Q Qt > a C m O >. Cn N m @ E N a h
Q
F
> o > a
m ° m°
m m U m m ar Y Q '� Q c m .- m 2> c m m aci fl. o m m �' u>
U c U u� v S co m m �n m o y a
¢ m
Z F'
_m .c
> m m y Q m U
_
'C 'C X O M 'C O O ."- a 0 W x UJ } Y v m ° -° ✓i N v+ m X Q C cn
F O
z°
c U U w c m
Q m
m Oi m LU
°° U a ° x o° m> v m 7- z o > m U o x m c o (° L (n > a m
Z Z O Z U F W J U m a N a U L21 m U p
Oz .�
Q
d a m m
m m O U E
m y m O 0 m> r 0 p N> m°
a Q m
N h N O m m p 0 O O N U �- h r M m m O O 0 O N m O O O to m
o
F U}
If)
O O to to m W
M O M M M O m
< r r N N r m m V
a
M M O 0 U 0 O N O M 47 LL'1 r 0 r ey V M m m m r d- u7 07 h V M to 0 N O N
M M O '- 0 (p 0.m r h r O� to �f1 r O M O M M rn 0 'Q V N M N h M en N h O rn O
N N a rn �R a a Z a a
uj
W
0
w S
r r r r r N N N (p r r N m r m M r N N (O r rn r M r N a h M r a
U
w
=v
F
z
a
u>
a
w
F=
z
z
w
c
Q
N
C
X
`a
m
d
o_ m U
O ° E J
d
Q
76 C a' _ -Qo�
d Q N C
T E N
°` c m 18L- °3 E Q
m c y
d m m c a� c J a ° c a °- v
E C
o
C C C O> O J C C C C� .
N O O E °' E > Q. O O C p Z
U N m
C U Q J >• Q d- E Q a C O Q> c oO E N m F N Q a. (n
o m LT C N O U E -
° J d C U
O m
O N N J d E c (� a U U C ° O N = d C J U& , a O °
J
J U �_ J
'O
= y> i N E 0 m U ° tT E W m Q C J t/� ° w m" a `a U C U3 =
U
N d N C t6 C N J
'C U ->
N J (D : U a) C C _ a w W o W
(U Q F E U Qy U C Q) E m
L al tT U1 > N C N C° O m N tl� -C m i U C
QJ
'C U o E to 6) Q � N
�O C C
C N _C
-m U .0 C O� m w C E m= U 3 d N � � a) N N � C C� r/ j .- N>, C O °, m y m w m
Q (6 d rn W O C E O 4=
> O Q OI N° S p T
0
C a1 O Ol
_
O > >> E W U N O S O d O N N O w O N
E U E U m d S C S Q E a E S 2 C U
C U S S Q a C C U` @ C N J O a O 'C E O ° m m o
E N C O O .Y r2
"2 o o °_= a U
m U@ N C ,�_ C d a > a N
m m m m tf c° m o E a� � m� w° m o L E a° m° c° O° E� 0 9-a c
U
m
m U S E cTi i m a' .0
E m
O O O O d Q E_ .m O N E ... UI C rG Q) a O= F C a C a Q7 m E T N 'm6 a 3=
p c (Xa m a = o
c¢ m is m a�i (ten m m m m as aci m ° t Y o a' o ° (¢n m a`�i _ Z U v t2 � m aci w
O Y �
Z Z Z z z 0 a a m a cr m� a a w U U co (n o o n U F F F F 5 �5 �i 2 Q Q 0 0 0 U U
0
0
(n (n 0 w 0 UI 0 U 0 0 co 0 w w 0 0 w (n (n U w w 0 0 0 0 U w w 0 (n U) m 0 W 0 0 W W m 0 W W n n n n n n V Oa
W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W _W W W W W W W W W W W W W _w W W W W W w w W W W W W W w w W W W W W w O-
F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F J J J J J J J J L
Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z W W W W W W w W
>>>> Q>>>> Q D Q Q Q D D D Q Q Q>>>> n U D Q D>> Q Q>>> Q D D Q Q Q Q O O 0 0 0 0 0 0
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000ZZZZZZZZ
c U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U Q Q Q Q Q 4 Q Q
O J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
U Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q C Q Q Q Q Q Q G Q Q Q C Q Q S Q F Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q J J J J J J J J
0
0 > 7 E o C r
m 0 4)
E
in a: m— - - N E c
< ± �
> E �E 0 0 m �o -2 < W
0 V- c� o jE� o
< 0
s >
0 0 E cm om (D 0 =a) M U) co -,T 1 0
E
0 > ca
IL -E E
w _0 co T
< 0 :E U) u m V) (1) C) u a� -7, 0 < y C� 0 0
:�z (D - - 6 U) CL of
O
O
O
wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000000000000000000000000
C,
;<
x x
'T cp I T rn O r� c? C� C? ll� 1� fl� 1? 9 1� 1� I? C�
m 6 m A A M M 0 cr M W N m N 0 0
cc
2E
<
of
CD
0
a-
<
Lu
< < < < < < < < < < < Q < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Q < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < <
0
I--
Z
(D
f1f
0 E
< C)
U S
0
0 0 10 0 N 0 N cq w N M
N Q3 Ul N
L-
0 o 0 0 0 0 M U c N
> , - 0) - m , & E om M
0 L E 0 Do c
< E
0 o
co
a
<<<� < 0 < <
E
u
Ljj
0
° J ° 0 0 0 0
a- z <c To -0 -0 -m Um) cmo -0 - - - -0 0 0 0 -0 -0 co amf (D -0 -0 -0
C
co
W
z
z
-0
< E
C)
ON
CD LLJ
, :�i
Q N E: 0
" > a, 4t 0 03
4t --a
W
�: Z
cr
43 < w C)
- > < c) - �) ,
— , > 7 om = co - R 0
-0 -0
<
< LLJ
>
n 0 P cr >�
0 0
> U) > U) > 0 U) co m (L) 0 co o
> cu 3 ? m ? f Z a) co C�
T,
0
w
0
< <
< - i L- .
< < 75 > c ') w ,,, ,
E CO m > CO
-
> 0 u
Fo
<
3 E
_j= 6) . > < E
6, co
< w Z E E o m
> 0
<
<
a.
(Do C, 0
iz
>
<
> 3: 0
-M 'co 'a, m M 0 a) n
LLi < cl)
0 CO
E
IJD
a a .o
V)
LU
N 0 0 j
't N N N N
03
0
W L
LLJ
U)
LU
ui
E
0 :3 O
< LU
.(D o
0 S) c
0 M 'i T -
� 0 E
0 8
< E
6 e7
C) o' 0 D E
75
0 C) <D C) 0 0 o c > 0
Z u
m .0
0 m C) U) o' c' E T .�z >
0 0 = ";s - r 0 E - . 0 E
0 m E
To 0
< = (>D Co E 4) 2 2� m 0 m E
.2 0 0 u < E 0 0 0
< W
0 T -2
o
��L � a) E Of E 0 E
M 0 0 0
o
E
E E E .1 o -,5 E 0 0 C)
> S. '6 0 '2
ol m 10) �O E E E -E E m o E -E E
-2 0
R E E Ma 'o 0'
C LU < C) C) 2: 2 < 0
O 0 0
0 E 0 76 ca (D
0 n C)
E E < 4 > C) u
'E E - z < m m T z 2 LL u m
oc 0 0
tL
< 0
16 E E 16 Op Z w
0 v
E E w
w 0 0 0 w w c X
0 o o o �m < 6 m o 0 0 o 0 0 OE
0 0 C) 0
0 u T a: = T: S� y 0 0 0 0 0
:E :E Z Z 0- 0- 0, 0 00 Con F- FE 3:
O
O
O
wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000000000000000000000000
was
Baldwin Park Housing memen
Appendix B
Sites Inventory: Parcel Listing
Parcel Number
(APN)
General Plan
Designation
Zoning
Allowable
Density
du/ac
()
Acres
Potential Lot
Consolidation
Current
Use
Realistic
Capacity
Infrastructure
Capacity
On-Site
Constraints
8550-005-024
Multi -Farr Res
R3
20
0.4621
no
vacant
7
yes
none
8438-001-019
Multi -Farr Res
R3
20
0.3903
no
vacant,
6
yes
none
8552-004-018
Multi -Fain Res
R3
20
0-2984
no
vacant
5
yes
none
8552-004-022
Multi -Farr Res
R3
20
03592
yes
vacant
10
yes
none
8552-004-023
Multi -Farr Res
R3
20
0.2322
vacant
---
yes
none
8552-004-022
Multi -Farr Res
R-G
12
1.0791
yes
vacant
30
yes
none
8552-004-023
Multi -Farr Res
R-G
12
0.5347
vacant
yes
none
8552-004-022
Multi -Farr Res
R-G
12
0.5266
vacant
yes
none
18552-004-023
Multi -Farr Res
R-G
12
1.0532
vacant
yes
none
Table B -2: Baldwin Park 2014 -2021 Housinq Element - Residential Opportunitv Sites lnventory
Parcel Number
(APN)
General Plan
Designation
Zoning
Allowable
Density
(du /ac)
Acres
Potential Lot
Consolidation
Current Use
Realistic
Capacity
(du)
Infrastructure
Capacity
On-Site
Constraints
8460-005 -035
Multi - Family Res
R3
20
0.53
Yes
1 dwelling unit
17
yes
none
8460- 005 -018
Multi - Family Res
R3
20
0.57
4 dwelling units
yes
none
8544 -025 -030
Multi- Family Res
R3
20
0.20
Yes
1 dwelling unit
29
yes
none
8544-025 -900
Multi- Family Res
R3
20
1 0.98
commercial /public use
yes
none
8544 -025 -034
Multi- Family Res
R3
20
0.60
2 dwelling units
yes
none
8544-026 -016
Multi - Family Res
R3
20
036
Yes
3 dwelling units
11
yes
none
8544 -026 -017
Multi - Family Res
R3
20
0.29
2 dwelling units
yes
none
8550 - 005 -023
Multi - Family Res
R3
20
022
Yes
youth home
11
yes
none
8550 -005 -024
Multi - Family Res
R3
20
0.47
youth home
yes
none
8558 - 004 -907
Multi - Family Res
R3
20
1.91
No
industrial
31
yes
none
8544 -031 -034
Multi- Family Res
R3
20
1.76
No
church
28
yes
none
8544-026 -021
Multi- Family Res
R3
20
025
No
2 dwelling units
4
yes
none
8544-026 -019
Multi - Family Res
R3
20
0.24
No
2 dwelling units
4
yes
none
8544 -023 -028
Multi - Family Res
R3
20
1.07
No
church
17
yes
none
8542- 008 -017
Multi- Family Res
R3
20
0.26
No
1 dwelling unit
4
yes
none
8542 -004 -001
Multi- Family Res
R3
20
0.16
No
1 dwelling unit
3
yes
none
8542 -004 -009
Multi - Family Res
R3
20
0.45
No
1 dwelling unit
7
yes
none
8542 -004 -004
Multi- Family Res
R31
20
0.12
No
1 dwelling unit
2
yes
none
8554005 -002
Multi - Family Res
R3
20
0.97
No
commercial /industrial
16
yes
none
8437 -002 -029
Multi - Family Res
R31
20 1
0.28
No
commercialfindustrial
4
yes
none
Table B -3: Baldwin Park 2014 -2021 Housina Element - Mixed Use Onnortunity Sites Inventory
Site
Number
Parcel Number (APN)
General Plan
Designation
Zoning
Allowable
Density
durac
Acres
Potential Lot
Consolidation
Current Use
Realistic
Capacity
du
Infrastructure
Capacity
Site A
8543 - 019 -001
MU
MU -2
30
1.2896
yes
commercial
61
yes
8543- 019 -004
MU
MU -2
0.1623
commercial
yes
8543- 019 -005
MU
MU -2
0.1994
commercial
yes
8543- 019 -006
MU
MU -2
0.1945
restaurant
yes
8543- 019 -034
MU
MU -2
0.3347
grocery store
Iyes
8543- 019 -037
MU
MU -2
0.1783
commercial
yes
8543 - 019 -038
MU
MU -2
0.1620
commercial
yes
Site B
8415- 009 -026
MU
MU -2
30
0.2578
yes
restaurant
18
yes
8415- 009 -027
MU
MU -2
0.1705
parking
yes
8415- 009 -028
MU
MU -2
0.1705
commercial
yes
8415- 009 -029
MU
MU -2
0.1550
SFR
yes
Site C
8415 -011 -002
MU
MU -2
30
0.2190
yes
SFR
22
yes
8415 -011 -007
MU
MU -2
0.4509
SFR
yes
8415 - 011 -028
MU
MU -2
0.23951
vacant
yes
Site D
$415- 009 -033
MU
MU -2
30
0.1692
yes
vacant, parking
15
yes
8415- 009 -034
MU
MU -2
0.4661
commercial
yes
Site E
8554- 002 -001
MU
MU -2
30
0.3301
yes
light industrial
68
yes
8554- 002 -007
_ MU
MU -2
0.4536
light industrial
yes
8554- 002 -008
MU
--
MU -2
0.4572
commercial, parking
yes
8554 -002 -030
MU
MU -2
0.3443
light industrial
yes
8554- 002 -032
MU
MU -2
0.6049
office, parking
yes
8554- 002 -033
MU
MU -2
0.6051
auto related use
yes
Site F
8554 -009 -015
MU
MU -2
30
0.1386
yes
SFR
17
yes
8554- 009 -016
MU
MU -2
0.1425
SFR
yes
8554 -009 -027
MU
MU -2
0.3210
commercial, light
industrial
yes
8554 -009 -900
MU
MU -2
0.1418
parking
yes
Site G
8544 -018 -047
MU
MU -1
30
6.4335
no
commercial, parking
154
yes
Site H
8437- 003 -001
Mu
MU-11
30
0.3774
yes
gas station
49
yes
8437- 003 -002
MU
MU -1
0.1544
commercial
yes
8437- 003 -003
Mu
MU -1
0.1543
commercial
yes
8437- 003 -004
MU
MU -1
0.1545
commercial
yes
8437- 003 -027
MU
MU -1
0.8790
post office
yes
8437- 003 -028
MU
MU -1
0.1806
parking
yes
8437 -003 -029
MU
MU -1
0.1448
commercial
yes
Site I
8554 -001 -011
MU
MU -1
30
0.1746
yes
restaurant
24
yes
8554- 001 -012
MU
MU -1
0.2409
retail
yes
8554 -001 -013
Mu
- --
MU -1
0.1571
parking
yes
8554- 001 -901
MU
MU -1
0.1684
parking
yes
8554 -001 -904
MU
MU -1
0.1690
parking
yes
8554- 001 -907
MU
MU -1
0.1728
parking
yes
Site
8554- 001 -018
MU
Mu -1
30
0.6550
yes
commercial, parking
27
yes
8554 - 001 -019
MU
MU -1
0.2259
commercial, parking
yes
8554 -001 -803
MU
MU-11
0.2378
commercial, parking
yes
Site K
8437 -004 -064
MU
MU -1
30
1
2.5172
yes
commercial, parking
319
yes
8437- 004 -062
MU
MU -1
1.7771
vacant store, parking
yes
8437- 004 -061
MU
MU -1
2.5988
vacant store, parking
yes
8437- 004 -060
mul
MU -1
1.1024
commercial, parking
yes
8437- 004 -059
MU
MU -1
0.2305
commercial, parking
yes
8437- 004 -065
MU
MU -1
0.3835
commercial, parking
yes
8437- 004 -069
MU
MU -1
0.9155
commercial, parking
yes
8437- 004 -063
MU
MU -1
0.0330
commercial, parking
yes
8437 - 004 -063
MU
MU -1
0.0212
commercial, parking
yes
8437 - 004 -959
MU
MU -1
0.8458
commercial, parking
yes
8437 -004 -066
MU
MU -1
0.5962
commercial, parking
yes
8437 - 004 -070
MU
MU -1
0.1983
commercial, parking
yes
8437- 004 -069
MU
MU -1
0.3530
commercial, parking
yes
8437- 004 -067
MU
MU-11
0.7275
commercial, parking
yes
8437- 004 -068
MU
MU -T
F 1.0368
commercial, parking
yes
0
Baldwin Park Housing Elemen
Appendix C
Detailed Sites Analysis i
Toabovvtbopotenbalfbriofi|ldcvelopooenttonoestdbeRBNAo{557units,asite by
site analysis of the most suitable sites for residential development was conducted.
This section provides detailed information on the sites identified in the Mixed-Use
areas of the City. /\ total of 774 Mixed-Use sites were identified, more than ample to
meet the X8yJ/\ ufGS7 units. General Plan goals and policies are tailored to foster
lively, pedestrian-oriented mixed-use districts in areas designated Mixed-Use. These
Mixed-Use sites were identified as being most suitable for recycling based on the
unit-to-capacity potential and condition and maintenance of the existing buildings.
The density of the identified sites facilitates the development of housing affordable
to lower-income households. The City's Zoning Code contains provisions to
encourage the dnrc|opnocui ofooixud'use and higher density housing through the
MU-1 and MU-2 zones, These development standards were tailored to achieve
ruarinouon dcuoiL/zu and foster lively pedestrian and transit-oriented districts.
Sites [, l[ [ [ and }{are all located near the Bzddvvio Park downtown core. Site \{ is
located at a prime site in Baldwin Park in the heart of downtown. For several years,
the City has pursued the development of a specific plan in this area, including Site K
as the primary anchor area. The City's vision for this area is to reinvent downtown
as a mixed-use pedestrian and trans it-oriented urban village using a comprehensive,
coordinated approach to addressing physical and economic blight in downtown. To
pursue this vision, the City entered into an exclusive negotiating agreement with u
developer for Site l{ and neighboring parcels, but the significant national economic
downturn that began in late 2007 caused the developer to withdraw from the
process. Site y( remains an excellent candidate for redevelopment as mixed use.
Although originally constructed in 1989, the shopping center is aging, and the vast
majority of area is occupied by surface parking. The site vvnu)d be an excellent
candidate for higher intensity transit oriented development, as it is adjacent to a
Mctro)inkstadou. The developer formerly involved with the Specific 9)au for this
site estimated 340 new residential units on this site. The City's analysis estimates a
potential capacity for 329 new units. This site alone meets more than half ofthe
City's RBN&.
Site Ohas the potential to yield approximately lS4units, and is located at the
intersection of Maine Avenue and Clark Street, no the north end of the dovvotovvu
core. This site is under common ownership, and is currently occupied by an aging
commercial center, constructed in the onid-I960s. More than half of the site is
reserved for surface parking. In the past, there has been interest in development on
this site.
Site E[ with an estimated capacity of at least 49 units, is also located on the
prominent corner at Maine Avenue and Clark Street. The site provides opportunities
for further development based on the size of the area Cover two acres). The existing
uses include agas station, aging coourncrcial buildings (built iothe 1950s and 60sl
Baldwin Park 2O2O General Plan C-1 Housing Element Appendix C
containing retail and services including travel agencies and beauty salons, and a
post office. There is ample surface parking on each parcel identified. There are seven
parcels identified as part of this site, which are owned by four property owners.
Site I is located at the intersection of Ramona Boulevard and Maine Avenue, and has
a capacity ofat least 24units. Located adjacent to the Baldwin Park City Hall, this is
a superior location for mixed-use development. The parcels that comprise this site
currently contain u mix of low-intensity uses, including small restaurants, a
furniture store, and ample surface parking. The buildings oo the parcels were built
between 19%9 and 1955.
Site J has the capacity for atleast 27 new housing units. This site encompasses 12
acres and is located adjacent to the K4etro)iok station. This site is suitable for a
transit-oriented mixed-use development. Existing uses include a recently
constructed small commercial center and a bank building each with their ovvu
surface parking, in addition to ate|cphoue company building and surface parking
lots. At least two identified parcels are under cornrnoo ownership. As of 2012, a
paddoD structure was under construction adjacent to this site to serve the
Metroliok Station and surrounding uses, including City BaO. /\ mixed-use
development at Site 7 would bmappropriate.
Sites A,£L(, and D are located io the North Maine Avenue Corridor. The North Maine
Avauoo Corridor is currently characterized by an indiscernible land use pattern
which alternates between small commercial and residential uses. Two major public
facilities on Maine Avenue - the Performing Arts Center and the Baldwin Park
Continuing Education Center - present opportunities for establishment of
complementary land uses.
Sites A and B are located at the prominent corner ofMaine Avenue and Olive Street.
This corner is a focus area for the City where neighborhood serving retail and
services may be combined with higher-intensity residential development. These
sites' yrocuiocot location along one of the City's uzz;or corridors increases the
potential for development in the planning period. Site /\ is composed of seven
parcels, but ownership is split between only four persons/entities. Existing uses
include surface parking and aging commercial structures (built between 1939 and
1963). Site B is located on the southeast corner of Olive Street and Maine Avenue.
Composed of four parcels, two of these are currently under the uucoo ownership.
Existing uses include an aging restaurant with surface parking, a small commercial
building, and a single-family residence. All buildings were constructed between
194R and l97O.
Sites C and D are both located on the east side of Maine Avenue, at the intersection
of Cavette Place. Site C includes a vacant parcel of 0.24 acres. The other parcels each
contain a single-family home, both over 68 years old; two parcels are under
conucoou ownership. Site D contains two parcels, totaling over half of an acre.
Currently, one parcel is predominantly vacant, with a portion devoted to surface
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan C-2 Housing Element Appendix C
parking. The other portion has a small commercial building, containing services and
goods sales.
Sites E and F are located just south of the Baldwin Park K8etro|iuk station. Baldwin
Park recognizes the train station as one key component of its program to enhance
Downtown and create a mixed-use, vibrant community center. The parcels that
compose Site B have a combined capacity for at least 68 new housing units,
developed at a density that accommodates affordable housing. Existing uses on Site
E include light industrial buildings with outdoor storage, an aging medical office
building, and an automobile repair shop. All buildings were built between 1950 and
1983. Existing uses on Site F include two older single-family residences (built in the
1950s), a uouail commercial building built in 1989, and extensive surface parking
areas.
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan C-3 Housing Element Appendix C
This page intentionally left blank.
Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan C-4 Housing Element Appendix C
FAT
.. i &US]
City of Baldwin Park
2014-2021 Housing Element
Initial Study and
Mitigated Negative Declaration
Lead Agency
City of Baldwin Park
Planning Division
14403 East Pacific Avenue
Baldwin Park, CA 91706
Consultant to the City
MIG I Hogle-Ireland
169 N. Marengo Avenue
Pasadena, California 91101
44
May 2013
- This document is designed for double -sided printing -
Table of Contents
Section 1: Purpose and Authority of Initial Stud .......... ..............................1
1.1 -
Purpose and Authority ............................................................................... ..............................1
1.2 -
Contents ....................................................................................................... ...............................
2
1.3 -
Tiering .......................................................................................................... ...............................
2
1.4 -
Approach ..................................................................................................... ...............................
4
Section2:
Project Description ................................................................ ..............................7
2.1-
Project Title .................................................................................................. ...............................
7
2.2-
Lead Agency Name and Address ............................................................. ...............................
7
2.3-
Contact Person and Phone Number ......................................................... ...............................
7
2.4-
Project Location ........................................................................................... ...............................
7
2.5-
Project Sponsor's Name and Address ...................................................... ...............................
7
2.6-
General Plan Designations ........................................................................ ...............................
7
2.7-
Zoning Districts ........................................................................................... ...............................
8
2.8-
Project Description ...................................................................................... ...............................
9
2.9-
Project Objectives ........................................................................................ .............................15
2.10-
Surrounding Land uses .............................................................................. .............................16
2.11-
Environmental Setting ............................................................................. ...............................
21
2.12-
Required City Approvals ......................................................................... ...............................
22
2.13-
Other Agency Approvals ......................................................................... ...............................
22
Determination................................................................................................
.............................27
2.14 -
Environmental Factors Potentially Affected ......................................... ...............................
27
2.15 -
Determination ........................................................................................... ...............................
27
Section
3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts .............................. .............................29
3.1-
Aesthetics ................................................................................................... ...............................
29
3.2-
Agricultural Resources ............................................................................. ...............................
32
3.3-
Air Quality ................................................................................................. ...............................
34
3.4-
Biological Resources ................................................................................. ...............................
40
3.5-
Cultural Resources .................................................................................... ...............................
42
3.6-
Geology and Soils ..................................................................................... ...............................
44
3.7-
Greenhouse Gas ........................................................................................ ...............................
48
3.8-
Hazards and Hazardous Materials ........................................................ ...............................
55
3.9-
Hydrology and Water Quality ................................................................ ...............................
58
3.10-
Land Use and Planning ............................................................................ ...............................
63
3.11-
Mineral Resources .................................................................................... ...............................
64
3.12-
Noise ........................................................................................................... ...............................
65
3.13-
Population and Housing .......................................................................... ...............................
73
3.14-
Public Services ........................................................................................... ...............................
75
3.15-
Recreation .................................................................................................. ...............................
78
3.16-
Transportation and Traffic ...................................................................... ...............................
80
3.17-
Utilities and Service Systems .................................................................. ...............................
84
3.18-
Mandatory Findings of Significance ...................................................... ...............................
88
Section4:
References ............................................................................... .............................90
4.1 -
List of Preparers ........................................................................................ ...............................
90
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Table ofContents
List of Tables
Table Regional Housing Needs Assessment ..................................................................................... I
Table 2 Unit of Vacant and Underutilized Sites .................................................................. I2
Table 3Unit Capacity for Mixed-Use Opportunity Sites ................................................................... 13
Table Opportunity Sites Surrounding Existing Uses ....................................................................... 17
Table Opportunity Sites Surrounding Land Use Designations ------------------l9
Table Opportunity Sites: Existing Conditions .................................................................................. 2I
Table Opportunity Sikes Net Operational Daily Emissions bnlbo/ day ......................................... S7
Table 8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory ----------------------------.5U
Table 9 Human Reaction tn Vibration ................................................................................................... 67
Table 10 Noise Ordinance Standards .................................................................................................... 68
Table 11 Noise Impact from General Plan and Cumulative Traffic .................................................. 68
Table 12 Common Construction Vibration .......................................................................................... 7I
Table 13 Existing and General Plan Buildout Roadway Daily Operating Conditions .................. 81
List of Exhibits
Exhibit Regional Context and Vicinity Map ----------------------------.23
ii City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Section 1: Purpose and Authority of Initial Study
1 ,
The purpose of this Initial Study is to identify and assess the significance of the
environmental impacts that could result from any potential future physical change in
the environment resulting from the adoption and implementation of the Baldwin Park
2014 -2021 Housing Element.
This Initial Study has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) Statutes and Guidelines and the City of Baldwin Park's local rules
and regulations. The proposed project requires discretionary approval from the City
of Baldwin Park and review by the California Department of Housing and Community
Development (HCD). As the project initiator and because of the legislative approvals
involved, the City is the Lead Agency with respect to this Initial Study pursuant to
§15367 of the CEQA Guidelines. Specifically, this project requires City approval of a
General Plan Amendment. No other governmental agencies have discretionary
permitting authority with respect to approval of the proposed project, and there are no
Trustee Agencies, as defined in §21070 of the CEQA Statutes.
Pursuant to §15074 of the CEQA Guidelines, prior to approving this project, the City is
obligated to consider the findings of this Initial Study and to either adopt a Negative
Declaration (ND), a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), or to determine that an
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required. The findings of this Initial Study
support adoption of a MND, as discussed in Section 4 of this report. This means that
the long -term development of housing pursuant to the proposed Housing Element, in
accordance with the governing land use planning policies and zoning standards, could
potentially result in one or more significant environmental effects, but mitigation
measures to avoid or reduce those impacts have been incorporated, and the
consequences of the Housing Element update would be less than significant.
The environmental determination that is ultimately adopted or certified by the City is
part of the discretionary review process with respect to evaluating the merits and
disadvantages of the proposed Housing Element. The findings and determination of
impact significance presented herein neither presuppose nor mandate any actions by
the City concerning future decisions on the proposed Housing Element.
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Section 1: Purpose and Authori of Initial Stud
1.2 - CONTENTS
This report has been prepared to comply with Section 15063 of the State CEQA
Guidelines, which sets forth in the required contents of an Initial Study. These
include:
• A description of the project, including the location of the project (see Section 2)
• Identification of the environmental setting (see Section 2.11)
• Identification of environmental effects by use of a checklist, matrix, or other
methods, provided that entries on the checklist or other form are briefly
explained to indicate that there is some evidence to support the entries (see
Section 4)
• Discussion of ways to mitigate significant effects identified, if any (see Section 4)
• Examination of whether the project is compatible with existing zoning, plans,
and other applicable land use controls (see Sections 2.6 and 2.7)
• The name(s) of the person(s) who prepared or participated in the preparation of
the Initial Study (see Section 5.1)
1.3 - TIERING
Section 15152 et al of the CEQA Guidelines describes "tiering" as a streamlining tool as
follows:
(a) "Tiering' refers to using the analysis of general matters contained in a broader
EIR (such as one prepared for a general plan or policy statement) with later EIRs and
negative declarations on narrower projects; incorporating by reference the general
discussions from the broader EIR; and concentrating the later EIR or negative
declaration solely on the issues specific to the later project.
(b) Agencies are encouraged to tier the environmental analyses which they prepare
for separate but related projects including general plans, zoning changes, and
development projects. This approach can eliminate repetitive discussions of the same
issues and focus the later EIR or negative declaration on the actual issues ripe for
decision at each level of environmental review. Tiering is appropriate when the
sequence of analysis is from an EIR prepared for a general plan, policy, or program to
an EIR or negative declaration for another plan, policy, or program of lesser scope, or
to a site- specific EIR or negative declaration. Tiering does not excuse the lead agency
from adequately analyzing reasonably foreseeable significant environmental effects of
the project and does not justify deferring such analysis to a later tier EIR or negative
declaration. However, the level of detail contained in a first tier EIR need not be
greater than that of the program, plan, policy, or ordinance being analyzed.
(c) Where a lead agency is using the tiering process in connection with an EIR for a
large -scale planning approval, such as a general plan or component thereof (e.g., an
area plan or community plan), the development of detailed, site - specific information
may not be feasible but can be deferred, in many instances, until such time as the lead
agency prepares a future environmental document in connection with a project of a
2 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Section 1: Purpose and Authority of Initial Study
more limited geographical scale, as long as deferral does not prevent adequate
identification of significant effects of the planning approval at hand.
(d) Where an FIR has been prepared and certified for a program, plan, policy, or
ordinance consistent with the requirements of this section, any lead agency for a later
project pursuant to or consistent with the program, plan, policy, or ordinance should
limit the FIR or negative declaration on the later project to affects which:
(1) Were not examined as significant effects on the environment in the prior EIR; or
(2) Are susceptible to substantial reduction or avoidance by the choice of specific
revisions in the project, by the imposition of conditions, or other means.
(e) Tiering under this section shall be limited to situations where the project is
consistent with the general plan and zoning of the city or county in which the project
is located, except that a project requiring a rezone to achieve or maintain conformity
with a general plan may be subject to tiering.
(f) A later EIR shall be required when the initial study or other analysis finds that
the later project may cause significant effects on the environment that were not
adequately addressed in the prior EIR. A negative declaration shall be required when
the provisions of Section 15070 are met.
(1) Where a lead agency determines that a cumulative effect has been adequately
addressed in the prior EIR that effect is not treated as significant for purposes of the
later EIR or negative declaration, and need not be discussed in detail.
(2) When assessing whether there is a new significant cumulative effect, the lead
agency shall consider whether the incremental effects of the project would be
considerable when viewed in the context of past, present, and probable future projects.
At this point, the question is not whether there is a significant cumulative impact, but
whether the effects of the project are cumulatively considerable. For a discussion on
how to assess whether project impacts are cumulatively considerable, see Section
15064(i).
(3) Significant environmental effects have been "adequately addressed" if the lead
agency determines that:
(A) they have been mitigated or avoided as a result of the prior environmental
impact report and findings adopted in connection with that prior environmental
report; or
(B) they have been examined at a sufficient level of detail in the prior environmental
impact report to enable those effects to be mitigated or avoided by site specific
revisions, the imposition of conditions, or by other means u1 connection with the
approval of the later project.
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 3
Section 1: Purpose and Authority of Initial Study
(g) When tiering is used, the later EIRs or negative declarations shall refer to the
prior EIR and state where a copy of the prior EIR may be examined. The later EIR or
negative declaration should state that the lead agency is using the tiering concept and
that it is being tiered with the earlier EIR.
(h) There are various types of EIRs that may be used in a tiering situation. These
include, but are not limited to, the following:
(1) General Plan EIR (Section 15166).
(2) Staged EIR (Section 15167).
(3) Program EIR (Section 15168).
(4) Master EIR (Section 15175).
(5) Multiple - family residential development / residential and commercial or retail
mixed -use development (Section 15179.5).
(6) Projects consistent with community plan, general plan, or zoning (Section 15183).
This Initial Study for the Baldwin Park 2014 -2021 Housing Element has been prepared
through tiering from the City of Baldwin Park General Plan EIR (September 2002).
This document is available for public review at:
City of Baldwin Park
Community Development Department
14403 East Pacific Avenue
Baldwin Park, California 91706
1.4 APPROACH
The environmental analysis contained in this Initial Study is based on the following
assumptions:
General Plan Consistency: As the General Plan is updated and /or amended, the City
will ensure that such updates and amendments do not prevent implementation of the
policies contained in the Housing Element.
Project Specific Environmental Review: In the City of Baldwin Park, all housing
development proposals are subject to an environmental review process to determine if
CEQA review is required and if so, to identify potential impacts and impose
appropriate mitigation measures, if needed, to avoid significant impacts. This
includes both discretionary projects, subject to the requirements of CEQA, and
smaller -scale ministerial projects that require issuance of building permits.
Purpose of Housing Element Environmental Review: This project would not
authorize any plans for construction of new homes, or redevelopment of any
4 City of Baldwin Park Housing EIement Initial Study
Section 1: Purpose and Authority of Initial Study
properties to produce new homes. No direct environmental impacts, therefore, would
occur. This Initial Study addresses the assessment of potential environmental impacts
resulting from the cumulative effects of potential future housing development within
the Housing Element planning horizon (through 2021) in accordance with the City's
residential land use policies set forth in the General Plan. The purpose of the
environmental assessment is to determine whether there are any peculiar types of
impacts that could occur as an indirect result of the proposed Housing Element
strategies that were not examined in the General Plan EIR (September 2002), or if there
could be impacts that are more severe than those anticipated in the EIR.
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 5
Section 1: Purpose and Authority of Initial Study
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Section 2: Project Description
2.1 - PROJECT TITLE
City of Baldwin Park 2014 -2021 Housing Element
City of Baldwin Park
14403 East Pacific Avenue
Baldwin Park, CA 91706
Amy Harbin, City Planner
626- 960 -4011, Ext 475
aharbin @baldwinpark.com
2.4 - PROJECT LOCATION
The City of Baldwin Park 2014 -2021 Housing Element applies to all proposed and
existing residential and mixed -use zoning districts, as well as to General Plan land use
designations that allow residential or mixed -use development within the municipal
boundaries of the City of Baldwin Park. The City of Baldwin Park is located in the
County of Los Angeles and is bounded by the cities of Irwindale to the north, West
Covina to the southeast, unincorporated Los Angeles County land, and the Industry to
the south, and El Monte to the west. The San Bernardino Freeway (Interstate 10) on
the south side of the city and the San Gabriel River Freeway (Interstate 605) to the east
provide regional access. The planning area encompasses approximately 4,337 acres.
Exhibit 1 (Regional Location and Vicinity Map) illustrates the City's location within
Los Angeles County and its local context.
City of Baldwin Park
Community Development Department
14403 East Pacific Avenue
Baldwin Park, California 91706
The existing residential and mixed -use land use designations that support housing
development within the City of Baldwin Park include:'
' City of Baldwin Park. General Plan. November 2002.
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Section 2: Pro'ect Description
Single Family Residential. This category is established to allow traditional single -
family homes, with one dwelling permitted per legal lot. Residences in this category
consist generally of single - family detached houses with private yards. Permitted
density is 0.0 to 8.7 dwelling units per acre. Additional uses considered appropriate
within this category include religious and educational institutions, group homes,
community care facilities, and parking lots for adjacent commercial and industrial
uses, provided any such use meets development and use criteria set forth in the City's
zoning regulations. Second units are also permitted within this designation. Second
units may also be permitted within this designation as an accessory use.
Garden Multi - Family: This category provides for moderate density housing either as
attached or detached units at a density range of 8.8 to 12.0 dwelling units per acre.
These residences must include usable private and common open space. Additional
uses considered appropriate within this category include religious and educational
institutions, group homes, community care facilities, and parking lots for adjacent
commercial and industrial uses, provided any such use meets development and use
criteria set forth in the City's zoning designations.
Multi- Family: The Multi- Family Residential category allows dwelling unit types
similar to Garden Multi- Family, but at higher densities. Dwellings consist typically of
apartments and condominiums built at a density range of 12.1 to 20 units per acre.
These residences must include usable private and common open space. Additional
uses considered appropriate within this category include religious and educational
institutions, group homes, community care facilities, and parking lots for adjacent
commercial and industrial uses, provided any such use meets development and use
criteria set forth in the City's zoning regulations.
Mixed -Else: The Mixed Use (C /R) category has been established to provide
opportunities for mixtures of commercial, office, and residential uses in the same
building, on the same parcel of land, or side by side within the same area. Allowable
uses include those identified in the Multi- Family Residential and General Commercial
categories. The General Commercial category includes opportunities for a broad range
of retail, office, and service - oriented commercial uses. Multi- family residential
development is allowed at densities up to 30 units per acre without the requirement
for commercial uses.
Existing zoning districts that support residential development in Baldwin Park are
listed below.2
Low Density Single - Family Residential Zone (R- 1- 7,500): The R -1 -7,500 zone provides
areas for the development of detached single - family dwelling units on lots greater
than or equal to 7,500 square feet in size. The zone is intended to protect and stabilize
desirable characteristics of single- family residential areas, including larger lot sizes
and separation from incompatible land uses.
2 City of Baldwin Park. Zoning Code. 2012.
8 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Section 2: Project Deseri tion
Single- Family Residential (R -1): The R -1 Single- Family Residential zone provides
areas for the development of detached single- family dwelling units at a density of up
to 8.7 dwelling units per acre based on a single unit per lot with a minimum lot area of
5,000 square feet.
Garden Multi- Family Residential (R -G): The R -G zone provides an environment
suitable for both small -lot detached or attached dwelling units where more than one
unit may be built on a lot. Maximum density is 12 dwelling units per acre.
High Density Multi- Family Residential (R -3): The High Density Multi- Family
Residential (R -3) zone provides opportunities for persons to live higher - density,
multiple -unit developments, such as apartments or condominiums with common open
space and other shared amenities, and allows up to 20 dwelling units per acre.
Mixed -Use Zone 1 (MU -1): The MU -1 zone provides opportunities for primarily
commercial, office, institutional, and business uses emphasizing retail, entertainment,
and service activities at grade in addition to medium- and high- density residential
uses. The maximum residential density is 30 dwelling units per acre, with a minimum
lot area of 15,000 square feet.
Mixed -Use Zone 2 (MU -2): The MU -2 zone provides opportunities for primarily
medium- and high - density residential mixed -use developments, with limited
commercial, institutional, office and service uses distributed in a manner sensitive in
scale and design to the street environment and adjacent residential areas. Commercial
uses are oriented toward meeting local neighborhood needs. The maximum
residential density is 15 dwelling units per acre, with a minimum lot area of 15,000
square feet. However, lots with a minimum of 20,000 square feet may be developed
up to a density of 30 units per acre. This zone allows for horizontal and /or vertical
mixed -use.
The project is the adoption and implementation of the Baldwin Park 2014 -2021
Housing Element. The Housing Element is an integral component of the City's General
Plan as it addresses existing and future housing needs of persons in all economic
segment groups. The Housing Element serves as a tool for decision- makers and the
public in understanding and meeting housing needs in Baldwin Park. While the law
does not require local governments to actually construct housing to met identified
needs, it does require that the community address housing needs in its discretionary
planning actions by creating opportunities for housing in the land use plan and
facilitating housing development through policy.
Statutory Requirements
State law requires that all housing elements address four key topics: housing needs,
constraints to housing development, housing resources, and a housing plan. Analysis
of these topics provides the foundation for the preparation of a housing element.
Article 10.6, Section 65580 - 65589.8, Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 9
Section 2: Proiect Description
Government Code sets forth the legal requirements for a housing element and
encourages the provision of affordable and decent housing in suitable living
environments for all communities to meet statewide goals. This 2014 -2021 Housing
Element update is a policy document of the City of Baldwin Park regarding current
and projected future housing needs, and the City's goals, policies, and programs to
address those identified needs.
Government Code Section 65583 requires that housing elements include the following
main components:
An assessment of housing needs (including the needs of special needs groups),
analysis of constraints to housing development, and an inventory of resources related
to the meeting of these needs.
A review of the previous Housing Element's goals, policies, programs, and objectives
to ascertain the effectiveness of each of these components, as well as the overall
effectiveness of the programs in the previous Housing Element.
A statement of community goals, quantified objectives, and policies relative to the
maintenance, preservation, improvement, and development of housing.
Actions that the City is undertaking or intends to undertake, in implementing the
policies set forth in the Housing Element.
Housing Needs
Several factors influence the demand for housing in Baldwin Park. The four major
needs categories considered in the Housing Element include: 1) Housing needs
resulting from population growth, both in the City and the surrounding region; 2)
housing needs resulting from overcrowding of units; 3) housing needs that result
when households are paying more than they can afford for housing; and 4) housing
needs of "special needs groups" such as the elderly, large families, female- headed
households, households with a disabled person, farm workers, and the homeless.
The Baldwin Park 2014 -2021 Housing Element profiles key community demographics
and examines the related housing needs of various groups, including owners versus
renters, lower- income households, overcrowded households, elderly households,
special needs groups, and homeless persons. This information is detailed in the
Housing Element.
California housing element law requires that each city and county develop local
housing programs designed to meet their "fair share" of housing needs for all income
groups, based on projected population growth. The HCD Housing Policy Division
develops the Regional Housing Needs Assessments (RHNA) for each region of the
State represented by councils of governments. The Southern California Association of
Governments (SCAG) determines the housing allocation for each city and county
within its six- county jurisdiction. SCAG has assigned Baldwin Park a housing
allocation of 557 units for the 2014 -2021 planning period. Table 1 (Regional Housing
10 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Section 2: Project Description
Needs Assessment) identifies the total projected housing needs for the 2014 -2021
Housing Element.
Table 1
Regional Housing Needs Assessment
Source: SCAG 2013
Housing Opportunity Sites
The Baldwin Park Housing Element identifies sites and future housing development
opportunities for the 2014 -2021 planning period. Baldwin Park has identified eight
mixed use opportunity sites, as well as scattered vacant and underutilized R -3 and R-
G sites that can accommodate the RHNA allocation of 557 units. These sites are
described in detail in the following pages and identified in Exhibit 2.
Vacant and Underutilized Land
Baldwin Park is largely built out. The major constraint on residential construction is
the lack of developable land and the resultant premium cost of finished units. The
inventory of vacant land designated for Multi- Family Residential development totals
1.7 acres. In the Garden Multi- Family Residential zone, there is one vacant lot
consisting of four contiguous parcels on Pacific Avenue totaling 3.2 acres.
The Multi- Family Residential land use category correlates with the R -3 zone in the
Zoning Code, and permits densities of up to 20 units per acre. Two vacant sites on
Ramona Boulevard are adjoining. These two sites have the potential for lot
consolidation and the development of at least 10 units. Conservatively assuming
development at 80 percent of maximum capacity, vacant properties located in the R -3
zone have the potential to yield 28 units.
Baldwin Park has a limited number of properties zoned R -3 that could potentially be
redeveloped at higher densities. These properties encompass over 12 acres, are
transitional in nature, and can convert to multi- family residential use without
Planning Commission or City Council approval. Infill trends in the City indicate that
multi- family developments such as apartment and condominium developments are
the most likely residential product to be produced. Recycling to higher- intensity uses
is very probable given the scarcity of land in Baldwin Park.
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 11
Section 2: Project Description
The City has identified properties that have the potential for sufficient added capacity
to make recycling of land economically feasible. Four of the sites involve adjoining
parcels, increasing the likelihood of lot consolidation and the development of new
housing units. On lots with the potential to be consolidated, there is the capacity for
68 new units. One of the sites consists of three contiguous parcels that can be
consolidated with the potential for 29 units. Another parcel is currently used for
industrial purposes, but is designated in the General Plan and zoned for residential
use. Tlus site has the potential for 31 new dwelling units.
Table 2
Unit Capacity of Vacant and Underutilized Sites
Source: City of Baldwin Park 2014 -2021 Housing Element
Mired -Use Opportunity Sites
Opportunities for infill development are in areas designated Mixed Use, including the
greater downtown area and along North Maine Avenue. The potential for creation of
residential units in mixed -use areas is predicated on the interest from developers —
expressed to the City — and on the limited opportunities for higher - density
development elsewhere in the City or in the immediate surrounding area.
Development within the Mixed Use areas is permitted to achieve densities of 30 units
per acre per the General Plan.
Zoning regulations have been tailored to facilitate housing development at these
densities. The maximum residential density in the MU -1 zone is 30 dwelling units per
acre, with a required minimum lot area of 15,000 square feet. In the MU -2 zone, the
maximum residential density is 30 dwelling units per acre on lots with a minimum of
20,000 square feet. Lots less than 20,000 square feet in size have a maximum density of
15 units per acre. These provisions encourage lot consolidation to achieve greater
densities.
The Baldwin Park Housing Element identifies 11 mixed -use sites with the potential
combined capacity for 774 units (Table 3, Unit Capacity for Mixed -Use Opportunity
Sites). Exhibit 2 indicates the location of all sites identified in the Housing Element.
Due to the density at which the Mixed -Use sites are available, the potential units are
counted toward the lower- income categories for the RHNA, consistent with State law.
12 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Section 2: Project Description
Table 3
Unit Capacity for Mixed -Use Opportunity Sites
Source: City of Baldwin Park 2014 -2021 Housing Element
The Opportunity Sites serve as the primary basis for environmental impact analysis in
this Initial Study. This is based on the fact that specific policies and direction within
the proposed Housing Element are guiding these parcels to be developed or recycled
and therefore could lead to a future physical change in the environment.
Housing Plan
For the City of Baldwin Park, the objective is to facilitate and encourage housing that
fulfills the diverse needs of the community. To achieve this goal the Housing Plan
identifies long -term housing goals and shorter -term policies to address housing needs.
The goals and policies are then implemented through a series of housing programs.
Programs identify specific actions the City plans to undertake toward achieving each
goal and policy.
Goal 1: Maintain and improve the quality of existing housing and residential
neighborhoods.
Policy 1.1: Encourage the ongoing maintenance and repair of owner-
occupied and rental housing to prevent deterioration of housing
in the City.
Policy 1.2: Promote the rehabilitation of substandard and deteriorating
housing in areas designated for long term residential use.
Promote efforts to remove substandard units which cannot be
rehabilitated.
Policy 1.3: Provide focused code enforcement and rehabilitation efforts in
targeted neighborhoods to achieve substantive neighborhood
improvements.
Policy 1.4: Work to alleviate unit overcrowding by encouraging owners to
add bedrooms, baths, and additional living areas in existing
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 1.3
Section 2: Project Description
homes. Offer financial assistance for room additions to income-
qualified households.
Policy 1.5: Work to alleviate illegal conversions of garages and patios
through code enforcement, supported by rehabilitation assistance.
Policy 1.6: Cooperate with non - profit housing providers in the acquisition,
rehabilitation, and maintenance of older apartment complexes as
long -term affordable housing.
Policy 1.7: Preserve low- income housing in the City at risk of converting to
market rate by monitoring the status of pre - payment eligible
projects and identifying financial and organizational resources
available to preserve these units.
Goal 2: Assist in the development of housing affordable to low- and moderate -
income households.
Policy 2.1: Provide favorable home purchasing options to lower - income
households.
Policy 2.2: Encourage developers of for -sale housing to utilize the City's first -
time homebuyer assistance program to qualify for lower income
applicants.
Policy 2.3: Continue to provide rental assistance to very low - income
households who are overpaying for housing.
Policy 2.4: Offer financial and /or regulatory incentives where feasible to
encourage the development of affordable housing.
Policy 2.5: Assist residential developers in identifying and consolidating
parcels suitable for new housing development.
Policy 2.6: Actively pursue additional sources of funds for affordable
housing.
Goal 3: Provide adequate residential sites through appropriate land use and
zoning designations to accommodate the City's regional share of
housing needs.
Policy 3.1: Provide for a range of residential development types in Baldwin
Park, including low density single - family homes, small lot single -
family subdivisions, and medium - density townhomes, and
higher- density apartments and condominiums.
Policy 3.2: Implement the Land Use Element, and facilitate development of
mixed -use residential projects near Downtown and along North
Maine Avenue.
Policy 3.3: Maintain consistency between General Plan land use policies and
the Zoning Code.
Policy 3.4: Continue to provide opportunities for infill housing development
in R -3 zones and in Mixed -Use areas.
Policy 3.5: Promote mixed -use and higher- density housing in close proximity
to commercial areas and transportation routes for accessibility to
services.
14 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Section 2: Project Description
Policy 3.6: Continue to encourage second units as accessory structures on
single - family lots.
Goal 4: Mitigate governmental constraints to housing production.
Policy 4.1:
Periodically review City regulations, ordinances, departmental
processing procedures and residential fees related to rehabilitation
and /or construction to assess their impact on housing costs, and
revise as appropriate.
Policy 4.2:
Continue to utilize density bonus incentives to encourage market
rate developments to integrate units affordable to lower income
households.
Policy 4.3:
Continue to utilize the Specific Plan process as a means of
providing flexible development standards for affordable housing
development.
Policy 4.4:
Continue to utilize the Administrative Adjustment Process and
concurrent review process as a means of streamlining
development review procedures.
Policy 4.5:
Designate appropriate zoning districts for the location of
transitional housing and emergency shelters, and maintain
standards to enhance the compatibility of these uses with the
surrounding neighborhood.
Goal 5: Promote equal housing opportunity for all residents.
Policy 5.1: Continue to enforce fair housing law prohibiting arbitrary
discrimination in the building, financing, selling, or renting of
housing on the basis of race, religion, family status, national
origin, physical handicap or other such characteristics.
Policy 5.2: Continue to offer fair housing services to residents, including
tenant /landlord dispute resolution and discrimination complaint
investigation.
Policy 53: Provide that displacement of low - income households is avoided
and, where necessary, is carried out in an equitable manner.
Policy 5.4: Require mobile home and trailer park owners proposing park
closures to adhere to State relocation requirements.
Policy 5.5: Encourage housing construction or alteration to meet the needs of
residents with special needs such as the elderly, disabled, and
developmentally disabled.
The goals, policies, and programs in the Housing Element build upon the identified
housing needs in the community, constraints confronting the City, and resources
available to address the housing needs. Baldwin Park's housing goals, policies, and
programs address the following five major areas:
Conserve the existing affordable housing stock;
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 1s
Section 2: Project Description
Assist in the development of affordable housing;
Provide adequate sites to achieve a variety and diversity of housing;
Remove governmental constraints as necessary; and
Promote equal housing practices.
2.10 - SURROUNDING LAND USES
Opportunity Sites A through K identified in the Housing Element each has specific
surrounding land uses that must be noted because those conditions serve as a portion
of the baseline for environmental analysis in this Initial Study. The existing
surrounding land uses for each potential mixed -use site are summarized in Table 4
(Opportunity Sites Surrounding Existing Uses). The vacant and underutilized R -3
sites are generally surrounded by residential uses and a identified individually in the
following tables.
16 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
V
Q
v
Cj
O
V
T
N
bA
W
bA
"LS
cr �
di O
H (n
v
.0
I3
O
a
i
"
U
bbD
�bbp G
~bhp
V
ba
o
co
� m
v
lz
It
by >
U
oo
bt
Eli
v
It
w w
w
0 >
by
on
a
v
m
>
>
It
o
v
hp
7—
ct
°DO
~b�°o
� �
a
J, U
�7, U
o
U
b°
0
U
Nm�cn
�
mNmo�
moNr+N
MN
..o0
000
oo�'diOM��'d'
O p 0 tf)
O O O O O
0 0 0 0 0
0 0
Ol cy m
CD o d oN
01 Ol C3, m
HCCN�n
O, i-1 N m cl w
Ol O,
N O; O
0
m N N
omo�°�
0 ? 0
In X00
n°�co
0
��N
O �n to pi
�N
0 0
woo °��co
d^ ti
� (� w d, O?
rn
M Ln In
'A
N
41
w w c-+
w o o d,
to t1)
w w w �n
d+ N in to
w p o w o w°
tiK Mal �a
v > N�a o
,tN
m m C- in ti
O C O c C f °
H M m
4 0 0 0 0
CO
m V3 N p N
0 0 4 O� O w
m N h
0 0
O O
6� p 0 �i
C H c
O� 0 0
Cl) o o m H r O
O O O O O N
D O� c+7
H M H do
'� O� h th
c-+ �-'� O M U"
O� N tYJ
O O N . N
O� .-I w
O N
N �y d+ t1) c,
C p �n w°
C- Oi O
0 0 cr
cti L� ri
O M M H d+ tdn
C� C O� O
C:j
0 0 0 0
4 4
O O O p� p
0 0
A
O p p
H 'l, O,
N N H
N
o � N p O
m In �
m
�
00 0
O
p
00
W N
O
W T
C O °
d
m
U
Q
w
U
bD
bo
O
N
ti
O
W.,
O
U
U
b-0
Er
CD
0
C)
U
c
UU
:5 C)
6 4
c�L
4
I
" X c
oo �
O
In In
.6
A 5
4
c� M,
u) L"
W oc cc
O ° p O
c In
Ic IN C,
A In
.o
cc C) C� ON
c al
ti
O
W.,
O
O
O
7Z
r.
Ln to
,u q.
CPS
O
u
0�
r-q
wn
U
wn
U�
Ln r.
U')
U)
m U-)
ur)
u
V u
ti
In
U')
J")
L14,
CD O
C=�
C:, -0
m m
000
mHr
11 2
In
C:�
LI)
I= —
C?
m 9) C� �4
C, m
1100
C:I .0
C� C)
C� m I
C-4 C'�
4 CD C) C� 4
V� t-� ,
U) Le) In Lf)
(N
4 C�
C?
0 m co
5
C? 'R, 1�1
C)
L, I I 1 4 11)
-, -4 06 o
.0 oc W°
-.z o M
.0 C:) C� C?
P,
5
't
4 4 0,
- - - 8
c C)
?
C� Ci
CD
L�) J 4 -,
L� 'j,
:�
m
cq 't
., 't (11 Cl
jI
A 9,
4
In 0� 41,
Lr) Le)
CD
t .0
q
,q
In Le)
oc C�
L'o
f
C� 51
If)
In
C), rn I,
- IN
C:)
In In
�:?
m
C? C?
n
n
cc C
x oc
C C
Hoorn
I
0
=
C
t
-0 t
0
u
q
w
w
u
z
0�
r-q
O
bA
WE
I
VJ
hOh
101
L
O
O
U-)
UC4
0
0
0
0
0
0
u
Ln
m y
6 ono or
oo°
ono
cl
Ln
In In In In
oc
o o o o o oc ,o
m U,
Ln In
c
8,
,to c-D In
4
It M
c,4
4 o
lrql
,D
1� 91
o� -
,D In In
91
In LA
b c� In In u-S C?
z M
11
q,
Izl 4
c <r In
=
0
cD
A
0c5
Q
ovto
In
tZ
i, In
c:) N 4 Zb c:,
O
U u
O
O
Section 2: Project Description
2.11 - ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
Baldwin Park is located in the San Gabriel Valley, approximately 15 miles east of
downtown Los Angeles. Situated in the Los Angeles Basin, the San Gabriel Foothills
and Los Angeles National Forest lie in the distance to the north.. The City is traversed
by two major interstate freeways: I -10 to the south and the I -605 to the west. The
Baldwin Park is highly urbanized and built out, with a suburban character. Cities
surrounding Baldwin Park are also fully developed and with similar layout, design,
and character.
The mixed -use Opportunity Sites identified in the Housing Element each has specific
environmental settings that must be noted because those conditions will serve as the
primary baseline for environmental analysis in this Initial Study. The existing
environmental settings on these sites are summarized in Table 6 (Opportunity Sites:
Existing Conditions). Several vacant and underutilized sites scattered throughout the
City have the potential to provide future housing. These sites are all designed for
residential use and are not listed in the following table.
Table 6
Opportunity Sites: Existing Conditions
* See Exhibit 2 for general locations
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 21
e ® s
A
Commercial/ Industrial
Commercial Retail
I Single Family Home
Single Family Residential
B
Commercial/ Industrial
Commercial Retail
1 Single Family Home
C
2 Single Family Homes
Single Family Residential
Vacant
Vacant
D
Vacant
Vacant
E
Commercial/ Industrial
Industrial
Commercial Retail
F
Commercial/ Industrial
Single Family Residential
2 Single Family Homes
Industrial
G
Commercial/ Industrial
Commercial Retail
2 Single Family Homes
H
Commercial/ Industrial
Commercial Retail
1 Single Family Home
Commercial Office
I
Commercial/ Industrial
Commercial Retail
Vacant
Public Facility
J
Commercial/ Industrial
Public Facility
Open Space
K
Commercial/ Industrial
Commercial Retail
Commercial Office
Open Space
* See Exhibit 2 for general locations
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 21
Section 2: Project Description
The City Council must approve a General Plan Amendment to incorporate the 2014-
2021 Housing Element into the General Plan.
2.13 - OTHER ...O
The State of California, Department of Housing and Community Development will
review the Housing Element for compliance with State law and indicate whether the
adopted Element is in substantial compliance (Article 10.6 of the Government Code).
The Department of Housing and Community Development has reviewed the draft
Housing Element and found it compliant.
22 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Region ontext Map
Vicinity Map
a15 0
N
Not to $6*
Exhibit I - Regional Context and Vicinity Map
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Section 2: Project Description
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
24 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
7E
CL;
11
le E
UJ
ca
u
0
7E
CL;
11
a
s
x
a
c
3
z
m
0
x_
m
Q7
R
0
v
m
a
F
DETERMINATION
2.14 - ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTiALLYAFFECTED
❑
Aesthetics
❑
Agriculture Resources
❑
Air Quality
❑
Biological Resources
❑
Cultural Resources
❑
Geology /Soils
❑
Hazards & Hazardous Materials
❑
Hydrology / Water Quality
❑
Land Use / Planning
❑
Mineral Resources
❑
Noise
1 ❑
Population / Housing
❑
Public Services
❑
Recreation
❑
Transportation/Traffic
❑
Utilities / Service Systems
❑
Mandatory Findings of Significance
2.15 — DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a
❑ NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will
not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to
by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
❑ 1 find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant
unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed
❑ in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by
mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to
be addressed..
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because
all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE
❑ DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant
to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that
are imposed o the proposed project, nothing further is required.
A I - (" E51 L3
Amy Harfin x y Plaimer Date
City of B ark
City ol'Baldwin Park dousing Element Initial Study 27
Section 3: Determination
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
28 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
3.1 - AESTHETICS
Would the project:
a) No Impact. A scenic vista is defined by a generally uninterrupted view of the horizon,
creating an aesthetic viewpoint. Scenic vistas can be impacted by development in two
ways. First, a structure may be constructed that blocks a vista. Second, the vista itself
may be altered (i.e., development on a scenic hillside). There are no scenic vistas visible
from any Opportunity Site or from anywhere else in Baldwin Park. Therefore, future
potential housing guided by the policies of the Housing Element update could not affect
or otherwise directly disturb a scenic vista.3 No impact will occur.
b) Less than Significant Impact. No State or County designated scenic highways exist in
Baldwin Park; therefore, scenic resources as seen from such highways could not be
impacted. Because the City is largely built out, the visual character of the City is
suburbanized; therefore, scenic resources such as rock outcroppings or distinctive trees
will not be impacted. The General Plan has identified several structures and buildings
as locally significant throughout the City; however, these are not located on the National
Register of Historic Places (NRHP), the California Register of Historic Resources
(CRHR), or a local register of historic resources. The visual character of these sites can
3 California Department of Transportation. California Scenic Highway Mapping System. San Bernardino
County. www.dot.ca.gov /hq /LandArch/ scenic _highways /index.htrn [January 2013].
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 29
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant
Significan
Impact
Impact
with Mitigation
t Impact
Incorporation
a)
Have a substantial adverse effect on a
❑
❑
❑
scenic vista?
b)
Substantially damage scenic resources,
including, but not limited to, trees, rock
❑
❑
®
El
outcroppings, and historic buildings
within a state scenic highway?
c)
Substantially degrade the existing visual
character or quality of the site and its
❑
❑
®
❑
surroundings?
d)
Create a new source of substantial light
or glare which would adversely affect
❑
❑
®
❑
day or nighttime views in the area?
a) No Impact. A scenic vista is defined by a generally uninterrupted view of the horizon,
creating an aesthetic viewpoint. Scenic vistas can be impacted by development in two
ways. First, a structure may be constructed that blocks a vista. Second, the vista itself
may be altered (i.e., development on a scenic hillside). There are no scenic vistas visible
from any Opportunity Site or from anywhere else in Baldwin Park. Therefore, future
potential housing guided by the policies of the Housing Element update could not affect
or otherwise directly disturb a scenic vista.3 No impact will occur.
b) Less than Significant Impact. No State or County designated scenic highways exist in
Baldwin Park; therefore, scenic resources as seen from such highways could not be
impacted. Because the City is largely built out, the visual character of the City is
suburbanized; therefore, scenic resources such as rock outcroppings or distinctive trees
will not be impacted. The General Plan has identified several structures and buildings
as locally significant throughout the City; however, these are not located on the National
Register of Historic Places (NRHP), the California Register of Historic Resources
(CRHR), or a local register of historic resources. The visual character of these sites can
3 California Department of Transportation. California Scenic Highway Mapping System. San Bernardino
County. www.dot.ca.gov /hq /LandArch/ scenic _highways /index.htrn [January 2013].
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 29
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Im acts
be impacted if incompatible residential uses are developed on neighboring sites.
Implementation of Conservation policies for Goal 8.0 listed below will ensure that
damage to historic buildings will be less than significant.
Goal 8.0 Promote the preservation of historic resources in Baldwin Park.
Policy 8.1 Implement provisions contained in the City's Historic Resources
Code to protect historically significant structures.
Policy 8.2 Encourage restoration of historic structures.
Policy 8.3 Maximize public awareness about Baldwin Park's history and
historical resources.
c) Less Than Significant Impact. Future housing development could change the on- and
off -site visual character of the area in which it is constructed. Regarding the
Opportunity Sites, the change would generally be from single- family, vacant, and
commercial to medium - density residential and mixed -use development. Future housing
development guided by the policies of the proposed Housing Element will be subject to
the policies of the General Plan. The Urban Design Element requires the
implementation of good design based upon adopted development standards and
guidelines. Pursuant to the following policies, future housing and mixed -use
constructed pursuant to the Housing Element update will have a less than significant
impact on the visual character and quality of the City.
Goal 4.0 Enhance the aesthetic quality of development in the City.
Policy 4.1 Require that signage on commercial structures be compatible and
integrated within the structure's architecture.
Policy 4.2 Review and revise, as necessary, the City's development standards to
improve the quality of new development and to protect public health and
safety.
d) Less Than Significant Impact. Future housing development would result in new
sources of lighting. Typical light sources from a single- family home would be outdoor
security lighting. Multiple- family residential developments would generally include
outdoor security lighting and parking lot lights, depending on the type of development.
Future housing development will be required to conform to the lighting standards
outlined in the City's Zoning Code. Section 153.140.040 (Light and Glare) of the
Municipal Code requires that all outdoor lighting shall be located and shielded so as to
prevent the spill of light onto adjacent lots. Pursuant to this standard, day and
nighttime views will not be adversely affected because lighting will be appropriately
shielded.
With regard to glare, building materials such as metal and other reflective materials
would be a typical source associated with residential and mixed -use development. The
Zoning Code strictly prohibits the use of metal reflective materials such as metal siding
and corrugated plastic or metal (Section 153.130.050) for all buildings and structures. In
addition, the Zoning Code specifies the allowed exterior building colors for all uses
(Section 153.130.110). The primary color on all buildings shall be limited to an earthen
30 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
hue that has subdued tones. Brighter colors may be used for architectural accents such
as ornaments, trims, fascias inlays, tile, ironwork, and awnings). Residential and mixed -
use development will be evaluated during the City's standard design and
environmental review processes to ensure that future development does not include
features that could result in excessive glare pursuant to Municipal Code Section 153.210
Part 2 (Design Review) which establishes a design review process to improve the general
standards and orderly development of the city through the review of the design, layout,
and other features of proposed developments and their environs prior to submission of
plans to the Building Division for plan check. This could include limiting the use of
metal building materials, requiring non - reflective metals, or minimizing use of high -
efficiency windows. Impacts will be less than significant.
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 31
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
3.2- AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES
In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental
effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site
Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional
model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether
impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead
agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire
Protection regarding the state's inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range
Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement
methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board.
Would the project:
e) Involve other changes in the existing
environment which, due to their location
or nature, could result in conversion of ❑ ❑ ❑
Farmland, to non - agricultural use or
conversion of forest land to non- forest
use?
32 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant
Significant
Impact
Impact
with Mitigation
Impact
Incorporation
a)
Convert Prime Farmland, Unique
Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
Importance (Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the
❑
❑
❑
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring
Program of the California Resources
Agency, to non - agricultural use?
b)
Conflict with existing zoning for
agricultural use, or a Williamson Act
❑
❑
❑
contract?
c)
Conflict with existing zoning for, or
cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined
in Public Resources Code section 12220
(g)), timberland (as defined by Public
❑
❑
❑
Resources Code section 4526), or
timberland zoned Timberland
Production (as defined by Government
Code section 51104 (g))?
d)
Result in the loss of forest land or
conversion of forest land to non - forest
❑
❑
❑
use?
e) Involve other changes in the existing
environment which, due to their location
or nature, could result in conversion of ❑ ❑ ❑
Farmland, to non - agricultural use or
conversion of forest land to non- forest
use?
32 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
a) No Impact. No land in Baldwin Park is designated as Prime Farmland, Unique
Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance according to the California Department
of Conservation, Division of Land Resource Protection. No impact would occur.4
b) No Impact. Implementation of the proposed Housing Element will not conflict with
existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract since, according to the
California Department of Conservation, no land in the City is under a Williamson Act
contract. No impact could result.5
c) No Impact. No properties in Baldwin Park are zoned for forest land, timberland, or
Timberland Production. No impact will occur.
d) No Impact. Due to the urban character of Baldwin Park, there is no forest land.
Therefore, there will be no loss of forest land or conversion of forest land as a result of
implementation of the proposed Housing Element.
e) No Impact. There are no agricultural operations or forest land within the City. No
impact related to the conversion of agricultural or forest lands would occur.
4 California Department of Conservation. Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program. Los Angeles
County Important Farmland 2010. ftp: / /ftp.consrv.ca.gov/ pub /dlrp /FMMP /pdf /2010 /1os10.12df
[January 2013].
5 California Department of Conservation. Agricultural Preserves 2004: Williamson Act Parcels, Los
Angeles County, California. fW: / /ftp.consrv.ca.gov /pub /dlrp /wa /LA11.1.2 WA.pdf Danuary 201.31.
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 33
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management
or air pollution control district may be relied upon to
make the following determinations.
Would the project:
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant
Significant
Impact
Impact
with
Impact
Mitigation
Incorporation
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation
❑
0
❑
of the applicable air quality plan?
b) Violate any air quality standard or
contribute substantially to an existing or
❑
❑
®
❑
projected air quality violation?
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net
increase of any criteria pollutant for
which the project region is non -
attainment under an applicable federal
❑
❑
or state ambient air quality standard
(including releasing emissions which
exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone
precursors)?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial
❑
❑
®
❑
pollutant concentrations?
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a
❑
❑
substantial number of people?
a) No Impact. The City of Baldwin Park is located within the South Coast Air Basin
(basin) under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District
( SCAQMD). SCAQMD and the Southern California Association of Governments
(SCAG) are responsible for formulating and implementing the Air Quality
Management Plan (AQMP) for the basin. The AQMP is a series of plans adopted for
the purpose of reaching short- and long -term goals for those pollutants the basin is
designated as a "nonattainment" area because it does not meet federal and/or State
Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS). To determine consistency between the
project and the AQMP, the project must comply with all applicable SCAQMD rules
and regulations, comply with all proposed or adopted control measures, and be
consistent with the growth forecasts utilized in preparation of the Plan.
A significant impact could occur if the proposed project conflicts with or obstructs
implementation of the South Coast Air Basin 2022 AQMP. Conflicts and obstructions
that hinder implementation of the AQMP can delay efforts to meet attainment
34 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
deadlines for criteria pollutants and maintaining existing compliance with applicable
air quality standards. Pursuant to the methodology provided in Chapter 12 of the
1993 SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook, consistency with the South Coast Air
Basin 2012 AQMP is affirmed when a project: 1) does not increase the frequency or
severity of an air quality standards violation or cause a new violation and 2) is
consistent with the growth assumptions in the AQMP. Consistency review is
presented below.
1. The project (including potential future housing development facilitated by the
Housing Element policy on proposed Opportunity Sites) implements land use policy
previously analyzed in the General Plan EIR. Thus, no impacts beyond those
previously identified will result from Housing Element adoption and implementation.
2. The CEQA Air Quality Handbook indicates that consistency with AQMP growth
assumptions must be analyzed for new or amended General Plan elements, Specific
Plans, and "significant projects." Significant projects include airports, electrical
generating facilities, petroleum and gas refineries, designation of oil drilling districts,
water ports, solid waste disposal sites, and off -shore drilling facilities. The project
consists of a General Plan amendment to update the proposed 2014 -2021 Housing
Element; therefore consistency analysis is required.
The Housing Element identifies vacant and underutilized opportunity sites for future
residential development. The Opportunity Sites could result in approximately 1,020
new dwelling units and 3,876 new residents (1,020 dwelling units at 3.8 persons per
household). SCAG provides population projection estimates in five -year increments
from 2005 to 2035. According to the latest growth forecast (2012), SCAG estimates that
the City would have a population of 82,200 and the County would have a population
of 11,353,000 in 2035.6 SCAG growth projections are utilized as the basis for both the
Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and the AQMP. Build -out of the General Plan
would accommodate a population of 85,291 persons in 2020, slightly higher than
projected by SCAG, and thus provides sufficient residential land uses to accommodate
growth projections for the City. In addition, the proposed Housing Element and
Opportunity Sites are projected to meet the City's allocated RHNA, which is a function
of the City's projected long -term growth. Therefore, by providing sites for housing
sufficient to achieve the RHNA, the Housing Element is contributing in the short term
toward consistency with long -term growth projections and the 2012 AQMP. The
proposed Housing Element does not propose densities higher than already permitted
in the General Plan (which were utilized in preparation of the 2012 RTP); thus,
implementation will not result in an increase in population and households over that
contemplated in the RTP and AQMP. These increases are within the growth
assumptions estimated by SCAG and therefore would not result in a conflict with or
obstruction of the AQMP.
Based on the consistency analysis presented above, the proposed project will not
conflict with the AQMP; no impact will occur.
6 Southern California Association of Governments. Adopted Growth. Forecast.
http: / /www.scag.ca.gov /forecast /index.htm [February 201.3].
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 3S
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
b) Less than Significant Impact. Because the proposed Housing Element does not
authorize any development project or land altering activity that would involve
construction of new or redevelopment housing, it will not result in any direct
emissions that could contribute to an existing or potential violation of an air quality
standard. The Housing Element update would have no effect on rules and procedures
governing assessment or control of air pollutant emissions.
The proposed Housing Element will not directly result in construction of any
development or infrastructure; however, future residential development supported by
the policies of the updated Housing Element will result in short -term criteria pollutant
emissions. Short -term criteria pollutant emissions will occur during site preparation,
grading, building construction, paving, and painting activities associated with new
development. Emissions will occur from use of equipment, worker, vendor, and
hauling trips, and disturbance of onsite soils (fugitive dust). Pursuant to CEQA, short -
term, project - specific construction - related emissions will be analyzed as development
proposals are submitted. Mitigation will be applied, where necessary. Such
mitigation typically includes requirements for use of low -VOC paints, installation of
diesel particulate filters on older construction equipment, and limitations on hauling
distances and /or daily trips.
To address operational emissions from a typical development project, an air quality
modeling analysis is typically performed to determine if a project could regionally or
locally cause a violation of any air quality standard. Using the California Emissions
Estimator Model (CalEEMod), long -term emissions from the planning area were
modeled. The analysis of operational emissions also takes into consideration the
reduction of emissions from the demolition of the existing opportunity site uses. The
emissions estimated for these were also calculated utilizing CalEEMod. These
operational emissions from the uses /buildings to be demolished are then subtracted
from the operational emissions for the proposed development, providing a net
increase in emissions. Table 7 (Opportunity Sites Net Operational Daily Emissions in
lbs /day) summarizes the net operational daily emissions. There are no established or
daily emissions thresholds for program -level environmental analysis. Analysis of
program -level air quality impacts are assessed through consistency with the AQMP
and identification of policies, regulations, and rules that will reduce pollutant
emissions from future development projects. The following emissions summaries are
provided solely for disclosure purposes.
36 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Table 7
Opportunity Sites Net Operational Daily Emissions in Ibs /day
Any future proposed development project would also be subject to SCAQMD's rules
and regulations. The Baldwin Park General Plan Air Quality Element includes goals
and policies that encourage mixed -use development and pedestrian- oriented design to
reduce pollutant emissions. With application of SCAQMD rules and the following
General Plan Air Quality goals and policies, no new or more significant impacts
relative to air quality standards would result from implementation of the Housing
Element update beyond those analyzed in the General Plan EIR. Because the proposed
Housing Element is consistent with the AQMP (see Section 4.3.a) and future
development projects supported by the Housing Element will be subject to
environmental review to ensure that daily criteria pollutant thresholds will not be
exceeded, impacts will be less than significant.
Goal 1.0 Improve air quality by reducing the amount of air pollution through
proper land use planning.
Policy 1.1 Establish a new Mixed Use land use category for Downtown which
provides for the integration of residential and commercial uses. Establish
Downtown as a pedestrian district through development regulations,
public improvements, and street design.
Policy 1.2 Locate multiple family developments close to commercial areas to
encourage pedestrian rather than vehicular travel.
Policy 1.3 Encourage the development of higher density housing in close proximity
to the City's Metrolink station.
Policy 1.4 Provide for the enhancement of neighborhood commercial centers to
provide services within walking distance of residential neighborhoods.
Policy 1.5 Encourage the design of new residential and commercial areas to foster
pedestrian circulation.
Goal 2.0 Improve air quality by reducing the amount of vehicular emissions
through planning for alternative forms of travel.
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 37
"44
1110i
•
5Q
WO
Summer
Area Sources
80.01
0.78
71.24
-0.03
0.03
0.01
Energy Demand
0.66
5.69
2.77
0.04
0.45
0.45
Mobile Sources
332.72
747.62
2,790.95
7.8
853.36
49.37
Summer Total
413.39
754.09
2,864.96
7.81
853.84
49.83
Winter
Area Sources
80.01
0.78
71.24
-0.03
0.03
0.01
Energy Demand
0.66
5.69
2.77
0.04
0.45
0.45
Mobile Sources
347.66
787.07
2,797.41
7.34
853.57
49.65
Winter Total
428.33
793.54
2,871.42
7.35
854.05
50.11
Any future proposed development project would also be subject to SCAQMD's rules
and regulations. The Baldwin Park General Plan Air Quality Element includes goals
and policies that encourage mixed -use development and pedestrian- oriented design to
reduce pollutant emissions. With application of SCAQMD rules and the following
General Plan Air Quality goals and policies, no new or more significant impacts
relative to air quality standards would result from implementation of the Housing
Element update beyond those analyzed in the General Plan EIR. Because the proposed
Housing Element is consistent with the AQMP (see Section 4.3.a) and future
development projects supported by the Housing Element will be subject to
environmental review to ensure that daily criteria pollutant thresholds will not be
exceeded, impacts will be less than significant.
Goal 1.0 Improve air quality by reducing the amount of air pollution through
proper land use planning.
Policy 1.1 Establish a new Mixed Use land use category for Downtown which
provides for the integration of residential and commercial uses. Establish
Downtown as a pedestrian district through development regulations,
public improvements, and street design.
Policy 1.2 Locate multiple family developments close to commercial areas to
encourage pedestrian rather than vehicular travel.
Policy 1.3 Encourage the development of higher density housing in close proximity
to the City's Metrolink station.
Policy 1.4 Provide for the enhancement of neighborhood commercial centers to
provide services within walking distance of residential neighborhoods.
Policy 1.5 Encourage the design of new residential and commercial areas to foster
pedestrian circulation.
Goal 2.0 Improve air quality by reducing the amount of vehicular emissions
through planning for alternative forms of travel.
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 37
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Policy 2.1 Continue to operate the City's fixed route shuttle system, and evaluate
expansion of the route as necessary to serve additional centers of activity
in the City.
Policy 2.2 Cooperate and participate in regional air quality management planning,
programs, and enforcement measures.
Policy 2.3 Utilize TDM to influence transportation choices related to mode and time
of travel.
Policy 2.4 Create the maximum possible opportunities for bicycles as an alternative
transportation mode and recreational use.
Policy 2.5 Encourage non - motorized transportation through the provision of bicycle
and pedestrian pathways.
Policy 2.6 Review the zoning regulations annually to identify whether revisions are
require to accommodate and encourage the use of alternative -fuel
vehicles (e.g. electric cars).
Goal 3.0 Improve air quality by reducing the amount of vehicular emissions
through transportation planning that encourages trip reduction.
Policy 3.1 Utilize incentives, regulations and/or Transportation Demand
Management (TDM) programs in cooperation with other jurisdictions in
the South Coast Air Basin to eliminate vehicle trips which would
otherwise be made.
Policy 3.2 Utilize incentives, regulations and/or Transportation Demand
Management in cooperation with other jurisdictions to reduce the vehicle
miles traveled for auto trips which still need to be made.
Goal 4.0 Improve air quality by reducing vehicular emissions through
transportation planning improvements that improve the flow of traffic.
Policy 4.1 Promote and establish modified work schedules which reduce peak
period auto travel.
Policy 4.2 Participate in efforts to achieve increased designation, construction, and
operation of High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes on local freeways.
Policy 4.3 Encourage employer rideshare and transit incentive programs by local
businesses.
Policy 4.4 Encourage businesses to alter truck delivery routes and local delivery
schedules during peak hours, or switch to off -peak delivery hours.
Policy 4.5 Implement citywide traffic flow improvements outlined in the
Circulation Element.
Policy 4.6 Adopt and implement the required components of the Congestion
Management Plan, and continue to work with Los Angeles County on
annual updates to the CMP.
Policy 4.7 Promote State and federal legislation which would improve
vehicle/ transportation technology.
Goal 5.0 Reduce particulate emissions to the greatest extent feasible.
38 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Policy 5.1 Adopt incentives, regulations, and /or procedures to minimize particulate
emissions from paved roads.
Policy 5.2 Adopt incentives, regulations, and /or procedures to minimize particulate
emissions from unpaved roads, parking lots, and staging areas.
c) Less than Significant Impact. SCAQMD has prepared an Air Quality Management
Plan to set forth a comprehensive and integrated program that will lead the Basin into
compliance with the federal 24 -hour PM2.5 air quality standard, and to provide an
update to the SCAQMD's commitments toward meeting the federal 8 -hour ozone
standards. The Basin is currently in non - attainment for State and Federal criteria
pollutants ozone, nitrogen dioxide and fine particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10)?
New development facilitated by the Housing Element update will be required to
comply with SCAQMD rules and regulations aimed at reducing construction- related
pollutant emissions, including fugitive dust and other particulates, as well as reactive
organic compounds and other ozone precursors found in paints and other coatings.s
Considering that the proposed Housing Element is consistent with the development
projections of the Baldwin Park General Plan and the breadth of existing standards
and regulations, implementation of the proposed housing policies and implementation
programs of the Housing Element update would not change or otherwise interfere
with the regional pollutant control strategies of the AQMP. The project's impact on
cumulative levels of regional ozone or particulates is therefore less than significant.
d) Less than Significant Impact. Common sensitive receptors include children under
age 14, the elderly over age 65, athletes, and people with cardiovascular and chronic
respiratory diseases. The project promotes development of housing that could likely
accommodate children and the elderly; however, the Housing Element update does
not authorize construction or redevelopment of any housing units. Through its
standard development review process that includes review pursuant to State CEQA
statutes and guidelines, the City will ensure that any future housing projects
developed pursuant to proposed Housing Element policies and programs provide
adequate protection for residents from any local air pollution sources. Project impacts
on sensitive receptors would be less than significant.
e) No Impact. Residential land uses typically do not create objectionable odors. No new
odor sources would result from adoption of the Housing Element because it does not
authorize construction of any new housing project or redevelopment of existing
housing. No impact will occur.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. The Green. Book Nonattainment Areas for Criteria
Pollutants. "rww.ega.gov /oar /oagps /oTeenbk /index.html [January 201.31.
8 City of Baldwin Park. General Plan Environmental Impact Report. September 2002.
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 39
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
3.4 - BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Would the project:
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Significant Significant Significant Impact
Impact with Impact
Mitigation
Incorporation
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either
directly or through habitat
modifications, on any species identified
as a candidate, sensitive, or special status
El
❑
species in local or regional plans,
policies, or regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Game
or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any
riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional
❑
El
❑
plans, policies, regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Game
or US Fish and Wildlife Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on
federally protected wetlands as defined
by Section 404 of the CIean Water Act
(including, but not limited to, marsh,
❑
vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct
removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the
movement of any native resident or
migratory fish or wildlife species or with
❑
El
❑
established native resident or migratory
wildlife corridors, or impede the use of
native wildlife nursery sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or
ordinances protecting biological
❑
resources, such as a tree preservation
policy or ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an
adopted Habitat Conservation Plan,
Natural Community Conservation Plan,
El
El
or other approved local, regional, or
state habitat conservation plan?
40 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
a) No Impact. Biological resources in Baldwin Park are almost non - existent due to the
suburban nature of the City and surrounding area. Future housing development will
not impact any species identified as candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local
or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and
Wildlife Service. There will be no impact.9
b) No Impact. Biological resources in Baldwin Park are almost non - existent due to the
suburban nature of the City and surrounding area.10 Future housing will not have a
substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community
identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service.71 No impact will occur.
c) No Impact. The National Wetlands inventory has no data for the City of Baldwin Park;
thus, it does not identify any wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
within the City boundaries.12 No impact to Section 404 wetlands from potential future
housing development constructed pursuant to the policies of the proposed Housing
Element could occur.
d) No Impact. Biological resources in Baldwin Park are almost non - existent due to the
suburban nature of the City and surrounding area.13 There are no migratory wildlife
corridors or nature wildlife nursery sites. Future housing will not interfere with the
movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors or impede the use of native
wildlife nursery sites. There will be no impact.
e) No Impact. The City of Baldwin park has no local ordinances or policies protecting
biological resources.14 Biological resources in Baldwin Park are almost non - existent due
to the suburban nature of the City and surrounding area. Future housing will not
conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources; therefore,
there will be no impact.
f) No Impact. According to the Conservation Plans and Agreements Database no Habitat
Conservation Plans or Natural Community Conservation Plans apply within the
planning area.15 No impact would occur.
9 City of Baldwin Park. General Plan. November 2002.
11 City of Baldwin Park. General Plan. November 2002.
u California Department of Fish and Game. Natural Community Conservation Planning (NCCP).
http: / /www.dfg.ca.gov /habcon /nccp /status.html [January 2013].
12 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. National Wetlands Inventory.
http: / / www.fws. o ov/ wetlands / Data / State -Down] oads.html [January 201.3].
13 City of Baldwin Park. General Plan. November 2002.
14 California Department of Fish and Game. Natural Community Conservation Planning (NCCP).
http: / /www.dfg.ca.gov /habcon /nccp /status.htn-d [January 2013].
15 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. Conservation Plans and Agreements Database.
http: / /ecos.fws.gov /consery plans /PlanReportSelect ?region =8 &type =HCP [January 2013].
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 41
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
3.5 - CULTURAL RESOURCES
Would the project:
a) No Impact. No buildings or other structures that are considered significant or historic
occupy any of the Opportunity Sites.16
b) Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. Although the City of
Baldwin Park is built out, the presence of significant subsurface archaeological resources
is always a possibility in areas where only surface inspections have taken place.
Implementation of the proposed Housing Element could result in the development of
vacant land and land identified as underutilized. Ground - disturbing activities
associated with subsequent development of land within the City could unearth
previously unknown archaeological resources. Therefore, implementation of the
proposed Housing Element has the potential to disturb or destroy undocumented
archaeological resources. Mitigation Measure C -1 will be applied to ensure that future
development projects guided by the policies of the Housing Element do not
inadvertently impact buried cultural resources by requiring examination, curation, and
documentation of any resources uncovered on a project site. With implementation of
Mitigation Measure C -1, impacts to archaeological resources will be less than significant.
Mitigation Measure
C -1 During excavation and grading activities of any future development project, if
archaeological resources are discovered the project contractor shall stop all work
and shall retain a qualified archaeologist to evaluate the significance of the
16 Robert H. Benbow, President/ Curator. Baldwin Park Historical Society. Personal Communication.
April 16, 2013.
42 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant
Significant
Impact
Impact
with
Impact
Mitigation
Incorporation
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in
the significance of a historical resource
❑
❑
❑
as defined in Section15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in
the significance of an archaeological
❑
®
❑
❑
resource pursuant to Section 15064.5?
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or
❑
❑
❑
unique geologic feature?
d) Disturb any human remains, including
those interred outside of formal
❑
❑
®
❑
cemeteries?
a) No Impact. No buildings or other structures that are considered significant or historic
occupy any of the Opportunity Sites.16
b) Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. Although the City of
Baldwin Park is built out, the presence of significant subsurface archaeological resources
is always a possibility in areas where only surface inspections have taken place.
Implementation of the proposed Housing Element could result in the development of
vacant land and land identified as underutilized. Ground - disturbing activities
associated with subsequent development of land within the City could unearth
previously unknown archaeological resources. Therefore, implementation of the
proposed Housing Element has the potential to disturb or destroy undocumented
archaeological resources. Mitigation Measure C -1 will be applied to ensure that future
development projects guided by the policies of the Housing Element do not
inadvertently impact buried cultural resources by requiring examination, curation, and
documentation of any resources uncovered on a project site. With implementation of
Mitigation Measure C -1, impacts to archaeological resources will be less than significant.
Mitigation Measure
C -1 During excavation and grading activities of any future development project, if
archaeological resources are discovered the project contractor shall stop all work
and shall retain a qualified archaeologist to evaluate the significance of the
16 Robert H. Benbow, President/ Curator. Baldwin Park Historical Society. Personal Communication.
April 16, 2013.
42 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
finding and appropriate course of action. Salvage operation requirements
pursuant to Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines shall be followed and the
treatment of discovered Native American remains shall comply with State codes
and regulations of the Native American Heritage Commission. Emphasis shall
be placed on avoidance of the discovered resource, where feasible, prior to
consideration of other treatment methods.
c) No Impact. The City of Baldwin Park is located on the San Gabriel Valley Groundwater
Basin.17 Soils of the basin consist of unconsolidated to semi - consolidated alluvium
deposited by streams flowing out of the San Gabriel Mountains. These alluvial deposits
are too young geologically to contain scientifically significant fossils in their original,
undisturbed location and therefore are not considered paleontologically sensitive. Thus,
paleontological resources could not be uncovered during future development on the
Opportunity Sites. No impact could occur
d) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Housing Element does not authorize any
construction of new homes or redevelopment of existing sites, and therefore would not
result in any direct impacts to human remains. Procedures to notify the County Coroner
and Native American representatives, as required by California Health and Safety Code
Section 7050.5, would be followed should human remains be found during the course of
any future development project constructed pursuant to the proposed Housing Element
update. Impact is less than significant.
17 CIVILTEC Engineering Inc. Valley County Water District 2010 Urban Water Management Plan. June
2011.
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 43
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
3.6 - GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Would the project:
44 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant
Significant
Impact
Impact
with
Impact
Mitigation
Incorporation
a) Expose people or structures to potential
substantial adverse effects, including the
risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake
fault, as delineated on the most
recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake
Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based
❑
❑
®
❑
on other substantial evidence of a
known fault? Refer to Division of
Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
❑
❑
®
0
iii) Seismic - related ground failure,
❑
❑
®
F]
including liquefaction?
iv) Landslides?
❑
❑
F
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the
❑
®
El
of topsoil?
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that
is unstable, or that would become
unstable as a result of the project, and
El
❑
®
❑
potentially result in on- or off -site
landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined
in Table 18 -1 -B of the Uniform. Building
❑
❑
®
❑
Code (1997), creating substantial risks to
life or property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately
supporting the use of septic tanks or
alternative wastewater disposal systems
❑
❑
❑
where sewers are not available for the
disposal of wastewater?
44 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
a.iji) Less Than Significant Impact. The State of California Department of Conservation does
not have data showing an Alquist - Priolo Fault Hazard Zone in Baldwin Park; therefore,
no Alquist - Priolo Fault Hazard Zones are located within the Planning Area. No impacts
related to fault rupture could occur.1$
Several potentially active faults in the region could affect the City. Earthquakes along
the Newport - Inglewood, Whittier, and Palos Verdes Faults are the most likely to cause
high ground acceleration. The San Andreas Fault has the highest probability of
generating a maximum credible earthquake in California. The General Plan includes
policies to reduce the risk associated with seismic activity by ensuring new structures
are safe through proper design and construction to include the requirements of the
Uniform Building Code. The policies also implement emergency procedures as well as
encourage emergency preparedness programs. With continued implementation of the
General Plan Policy 1.2, impacts associated with seismic activity will be less than
significant.
Goal 1.0 Protect the community of Baldwin Park from seismic hazards.
Policy 1.2 Implement Uniform Building Code's seismic safety standards for
construction of new buildings and maintain seismic safety of existing
structures.
Policy 1.3 Continue to implement emergency procedures contained in the City's
Multihazard Functional Plan and Emergency Preparedness Plan.
Policy 1.4 Support City's participation in local, county, and state -wide emergency
preparedness programs.
Policy 1.5 Promote earthquake preparedness within the community by participation
in quake awareness programs, including distribution of brochure
materials in Spanish and English. Encourage property owners to anchor
buildings to their foundations, bolt water heaters to walls, and implement
other preventative measures.
a.iii) Less Than Significant Impact. According to the Baldwin Park General Plan. FIR, the
southwest portion of the City is located in a liquefaction hazard zone.19 As noted above,
the City of Baldwin Park is located within a seismically active region of Southern
California. Liquefaction hazards occur in areas where groundwater exists near the
ground surface. According to the General Plan FIR, the depth to groundwater is more
than 50 feet, resulting in low potential for liquefaction. Future housing could expose
residents to risk associated with liquefaction, as two underutilized and three vacant
residential opportunity sites are located in the area subject to liquefaction. Development
of future housing would require investigation for liquefaction potential. General Plan
Safety Policy 1.2 above implements the Uniform Building Code's seismic safety
standards for construction of new buildings and the maintenance of seismic safety for
existing structures. Furthermore, the California Building Code (CBC) requires
preparation of soils reports for new development that would identify and provide
18 State of California Department of Conservation. Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone Maps.
http : / /www.guake.ca.gov /gmaps /ap /ap maps.htm [January 20131.
19 City of Baldwin Park. General Plan Environmental Impact Report. September 2002.
City of Baldwin Park Housing EIement Initial Study 45
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
structural remedies for liquefaction potential. Compliance with the goals and policies of
the Baldwin Park General Plan Safety Element and existing State regulations will reduce
impacts associated with liquefaction or other ground failure to less than significant
levels.
a.iv) No Impact. According to the General Plan EIR, Baldwin Park is not susceptible to
dangers from slope instability because the terrain is relatively flat. Therefore, future
housing development on the Opportunity Sites will not expose people or structures to
potential substantial adverse effects, including risk of loss, injury or death involving
landslides.
b) Less Than Significant Impact. Erosion is the condition in which the earth's surface is
worn away by the action of water and wind. Baldwin Park is relatively flat and built
out. Because the Opportunity Sites proposed for future residential development are
primarily infill sites covered by urban landscaping or impermeable surfaces, the
potential for soil erosion or loss of topsoil of topsoil is minimal. Therefore, future
housing and mixed -use development pursuant to Housing Element policies will not
result in the substantial loss of topsoil or substantial erosion.
c) Less Than Significant Impact. Liquefaction and seismically induced settlement or
ground failure are generally associated with strong seismic shaking in areas where
ground water tables are at relatively shallow depths (within 50 feet of the ground
surface) and /or when the area is underlain by loose, cohesionless deposits. During a
strong ground shaking event, saturated, cohesionless soils may acquire a degree of
mobility to the extent that the overlying ground surface distorts. In extreme cases,
saturated soils become suspended in groundwater and become fluid -like. Seismic
settlement often occurs when loose to medium dense granular soils settle during ground
shaking, and can cause structural damage to buildings when settlement is non - uniform.
Such ground settlement hazards may be identified by on -site geologic investigations
that are required of individual developments.
According to the General Plan EIR, the depth to groundwater is more than 50 feet.
Therefore, the potential for liquefaction hazard is low, even in areas that have been
designated as being subject to liquefaction (see Section 3.6.a.iii above). There are no
known ongoing or planned large - scale extractions of groundwater, gas, oil, or
geothermal energy that would cause subsidence within Baldwin Park. Therefore,
impacts associated with subsidence would be less than significant.
Lateral spreading is unlikely to occur within the City due to the lack of topography and
unchannelized water bodies. Topsoil, recent alluvium and weathered bedrock are
typically porous and may be subject to hydro - collapse; therefore, these materials can be
considered unsuitable for the support of engineered fills and structures. General Plan
Safety Element Policy 1.2 requires the implementation of Uniform Building Code
seismic safety standards for the construction of new buildings. The California Building
Code requires all new development to have a site specific geology report prepared by a
registered geologist or soils expert and submitted, which would ensure impacts related
to expansive soils would be evaluated on a project -by- project basis. Compliance with
46 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
safety policy 1.2 of the General Plan and the California Building Code would ensure
potential impacts would be reduced to a less than significant level.
d) Less Than Significant Impact. Expansion and contraction of volume can occur when
expansive soils undergo alternating cycles of wetting (swelling) and drying (shrinking).
During these cycles, the volume of the soil changes markedly and can cause structural
damage to building and infrastructure if the potentially expansive soils were not
considered in project design and construction. Compaction of loose soils and poorly
consolidated alluvium occur as a result of strong seismic shaking. Amount of
compaction may vary from a few inches to several feet and may be significant in areas of
thick soil cover. Topsoil, recent alluvium and weathered bedrock are typically porous
and may be subject to hydro - collapse; therefore, these materials can be unsuitable for the
support of engineered fills and structures.
Unconsolidated to semi - consolidated alluvium underlie Baldwin Park. Therefore, these
soils are considered potentially expansive. The CBC requires that a soil and geological
report be prepared for any development, including future potential housing. Presence
of expansive soils and identification of measures to eliminate this constraint (such as
removal and replacement with suitable engineered materials) will be determined
through site - specific geotechnical evaluations to be conducted as part of the City's
routine development review procedures. Such routine procedures will apply to all
future housing projects. As such, potential impacts associated with expansive soils
would be less than significant.
e) No Impact. The City of Baldwin Park is served by the Los Angeles Sanitation District
with a network of sewer lines. New septic tanks are not permitted in the City. No
impact would occur.
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 47
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
3.7 - GREENHOUSE GAS
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant with
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
Incorporation
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions
either directly or indirectly, that may
❑
❑
®
❑
have a significant impact on the
environment?
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy
or regulation adopted for the purpose of
El
El
®
El
the emissions of greenhouse
gases?
a) Less Than Significant Impact. Climate change is the distinct change in measures of
climate for a long period of time. Climate change is the result of numerous, cumulative
sources of greenhouse gas emissions all over the world. Natural changes in climate can
be caused by indirect processes such as changes in the Earth's orbit around the Sun or
direct changes within the climate system itself (i.e. changes in ocean circulation). Human
activities can affect the atmosphere through emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG) and
changes to the planet's surface. Human activities that produce GHGs are the burning of
fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas for heating and electricity, gasoline and diesel for
transportation); methane from landfill wastes and raising livestock, deforestation
activities; and some agricultural practices.20
Greenhouse gases differ from other emissions in that they contribute to the "greenhouse
effect." The greenhouse effect is a natural occurrence that helps regulate the temperature
of the planet. The majority of radiation from the Sun hits the Earth's surface and warms
it. The surface in turn radiates heat back towards the atmosphere, known as infrared
radiation. Gases and clouds in the atmosphere trap and prevent some of this heat from
escaping back into space and re- radiate it in all directions. This process is essential to
supporting life on Earth because it warms the planet by approximately 60° Fahrenheit.
Emissions from human activities since the beginning of the industrial revolution
(approximately 250 years ago) are adding to the natural greenhouse effect by increasing
the gases in the atmosphere that trap heat, thereby contributing to an average increase in
the Earth's temperature. Greenhouse gases occur naturally and from human activities.
Greenhouse gases produced by human activities include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane
(CH4), nitrous oxide (N20), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and
sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). Since 1750, it is estimated that the concentrations of carbon
dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide in the atmosphere have increased over 36 percent,
148 percent, and 18 percent, respectively, primarily due to human activity. Emissions of
greenhouse gases affect the atmosphere directly by changing its chemical composition
20 United States Environmental Protection Agency. Frequently Asked Questions about Global Warming and
Climate Change. Back to Basics. April 2009.
48 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
while changes to the land surface indirectly affect the atmosphere by changing the way
the Earth absorbs gases from the atmosphere.
GHG emissions for the build -out of housing units facilitated by the Housing Element
were quantified utilizing the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) version
2011.1.1 to determine if the project could have a cumulatively considerable impact
related to greenhouse gas emissions (see Appendix A, Air Quality Modeling Data). A
numerical threshold for determining the significance of greenhouse gas emissions in the
South Coast Air Basin has not officially been adopted by the SCAQMD. Individual
projects may be required to have a greenhouse gas emissions inventory prepared to
determine if individual projects exceed applicable screening or impact thresholds and
would thus potentially contribute substantially to climate change and associated
impacts. A summary of short- and long -term emissions and the analysis for each are
included below.
Short -Term Emissions
Future development projects will result in short -term greenhouse gas emissions from
construction. Greenhouse gas emissions will be released by equipment used for
demolition, grading, paving, and other building construction activities. GHG emissions
will also result from worker and vendor trips to and from project sites and from
demolition and soil hauling trips. Construction activities are short term and cease to
emit greenhouse gases upon completion, unlike operational emissions that are
continuous year after year until operation of the use ceases. Because of this difference,
SCAQMD recommends that construction emissions be amortized over a 30 -year
operational lifetime. This normalizes construction emissions so that they can be
grouped with operational emissions in order to generate a precise project GHG
inventory.
Typically, construction - related GHG emissions contribute insubstantially (less than one
percent) to a project's annual greenhouse gas emissions inventory and mitigation is not
effective in reducing a project's overall contribution to climate change. Implementation
of AB32 and SB375 through California Air Resources Board's (ARB) Scoping Plan and
SCAG's RTP /SCS are designed to achieve the required reduction in greenhouse gas
emissions, as is further discussed in Section 4.7.b. With the cooperation and support of
these plans, short -term climate change impacts due to future construction activities will
not be significant.
Long -Term Emissions
Future development projects will result in continuous GHG emissions from mobile,
area, and other operational sources. Mobile sources, including vehicle trips to and from
development projects, will result primarily in emissions of CO2, with minor emissions of
CH4 and N2O. The most significant GHG emission from natural gas usage will be
methane. Electricity usage by future development and indirect usage of electricity for
water and wastewater conveyance will result primarily in emissions of carbon dioxide.
Disposal of solid waste will result in emissions of methane from the decomposition of
waste at landfills coupled with CO2 emission from the handling and transport of solid
waste. These sources combine to define the long -term greenhouse gas inventory for
typical development projects.
City of Baldwin Park Housing EIement Initial Study 49
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Imp acts
Table 8 (Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory) summarizes net annual operational
greenhouse gas emissions from build -out of the proposed Housing Element
Opportunity Sites. There is no adopted threshold promulgated by SCAQMD or CARB
for assessment of program -level GHG emissions. Analysis of program -level climate
change impacts are assessed through consistency with State and regional greenhouse
gas emissions reduction plans is provided in Section 4.7.b.
Table 8
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory
Source: MIG ( Hogle- Ireland 2013
* MTCO2E /YR
According to modeled estimates, long -term greenhouse gas emissions from potential
future development on the Opportunity Sites will increase when compared to existing
development conditions. This is due to the underutilized and vacant nature of the
Opportunity Sites. Future housing and mixed -use development will occur on vacant
land as well as replace existing commercial uses. Table 8 does not account for
regulatory and project design features required as mitigation that may reduce GHG
emissions for each individual project. GHG emissions reducing design requirements
identified in the CBC include installation of low -flow fixtures, compliance with State
landscape irrigation requirements, and minimum 50 percent recycling during
construction and operation. Furthermore, GHG emissions will be evaluated during the
City's standard environmental review process as required by CEQA to determine of
GHG emissions from individual projects will require mitigation. Because future
development projects supported by the proposed Housing Element will be consistent
with State and regional greenhouse gas reduction plans (see Section 4.7.b), they will be
subject to environmental review to ensure that any interim or adopted project -level
greenhouse emissions threshold is not exceeded, and is subject to regulations requiring
reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Impacts will be less than significant.
b) Less than Significant Impact. Significant impacts would occur if the proposed project
conflicted with or interfered with implementation of any existing GHG reduction plan
that is projected to achieve greenhouse gas reduction targets. The two primary
reduction plans are California Air Resources Board (CARB) Scoping Plan and SCAG's
Regional Transportation Plan/ Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP /SCS) as
discussed below.
50 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
California Air Resources Board Scoping Plan (AB32)
The CARB Scoping Plan is the comprehensive plan to reach the GHG reduction targets
stipulated in A1332. The key elements of the plan are to expand and strengthen energy
efficiency programs, achieve a statewide renewable energy mix of 33 percent, develop a
cap -and -trade program with other partners in the Western Climate Initiative (includes
seven states in the United States and four territories in Canada), establish transportation-
related targets, and establish fees.21 CARB estimates that implementation of these
measures will reduce GHG emissions in the state by 136 MWCO2E by 2020; therefore,
implementation of the Scoping Plan will meet the 2020 reduction target of 80
MMTCO2E, which is a reduction of 27 percent compared to the projected business as
usual 507 MMTCO2E.
Many of the strategies identified in the Scoping Plan are not applicable at the General
Plan or project level, such as long -term technological improvements to reduce emissions
from vehicles. Some measures are applicable and supported by the project, such as
provision of mixed -use developments. Finally, while some measures are not directly
applicable, the project would not conflict with their implementation. Reduction
measures are grouped into 18 action categories, as follows:
1. California Cap- and -Trade Program Linked to Western Climate Initiative Partner
Jurisdictions. Implement a broad -based California cap- and -trade program to
provide a firm limit on emissions. Link the California cap- and -trade program with
other Western Climate Initiative Partner programs to create a regional market
system to achieve greater environmental and economic benefits for California.22
Ensure California's program meets all applicable AB 32 requirements for market -
based mechanisms. These programs involve capping emissions from electricity
generation, industrial facilities, and broad- scoped fuels. The project does not involve
any such uses..
2. California Light -Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Standards. Implement adopted
Pavley standards and planned second phase of the program. Align zero - emission
vehicle, alternative and renewable fuel and vehicle technology programs with long-
term climate change goals. This is not applicable as this is a statewide measure
establishing vehicle emissions standards.
3. Energy Efficiency. Maximize energy efficiency building and appliance standards,
and pursue additional efficiency efforts including new technologies, and new policy
and implementation mechanisms. Pursue comparable investment in energy
efficiency from all retail providers of electricity in California (including both
investor -owned and publicly owned utilities). The Housing Element promotes
energy- efficient building design, as well as implementation of existing building and
other codes regulating minimum energy, water, and waste efficiency consistent with
2011 CALGREEN requirements and would thus be consistent and not interfere with
this program.
21 California Air Resources Board. Climate Change Scoping Plan. December 2008.
22 California Air Resources Board. California GHG Emissions - Forecast (2002 - 2020). October 2010.
City of Baldwin Park Housing EIement Initial Study S1
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
4. Renewables Portfolio Standards. Achieve 33 percent renewable energy mix
statewide by 2020. This establishes the minimum statewide renewable energy mix
and is not applicable at a City level or below for implementation. The proposed
Housing Element would not interfere with the implementation of this program.
5. Low Carbon Fuel Standard. Develop and adopt the Low Carbon Fuel Standard.
This is not applicable to a City as this establishes reduced carbon intensity of
transportation fuels.
6. Regional Transportation - Related Greenhouse Gas Targets. Develop regional
greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets for passenger vehicles. As is detailed
below, the proposed Housing Element would not conflict with and would support
the implementation of SCAG's RTP /SCS to achieve the required GHG reduction
goals by 2020 and 2035 based on consistency with growth projections. The Baldwin
Park General Plan includes policies to reduce vehicle miles traveled by encouraging
mixed -use, infill, an improved jobs - housing balance, and alternative modes of
transportation.
7. Vehicle Efficiency Measures. Implement light -duty vehicle efficiency measures.
This is not applicable to a city as this identifies measures such as minimum tire -fuel
efficiency, lower friction oil, and reduction in air conditioning use.
8. Goods Movement. Implement adopted regulations for the use of shore power for
ships at berth. Improve efficiency in goods movement activities. Identifies measures
to improve goods movement efficiencies such as advanced combustion strategies,
friction reduction, waste heat recovery, and electrification of accessories. The
proposed Housing Element will not result in the development of uses that will
involve the movement of goods and therefore would not interfere with eventual
implementation.
9. Million Solar Roofs Program. Install 3,000 megawatts of solar - electric capacity
under California's existing solar programs. Sets goal for use of solar systems
throughout the state. The proposed Housing Element would not interfere with but
instead would directly support installation of alternative energy sources through
City policies and programs.
10. Medium- and Heavy -Duty Vehicles. Adopt medium -duty (MD) and heavy -duty
(HD) vehicle efficiencies. Aerodynamic efficiency measures for HD trucks pulling
trailers 53 -feet or longer that include improvements in trailer aerodynamics and use
of rolling resistance tires were adopted in 2008 and went into effect in 2010.23 Future,
yet to be determined improvements, includes hybridization of MD and HD trucks.
The proposed Housing Element will not result in development of industrial uses and
therefore would not interfere with implementation of this program.
11. Industrial Emissions. Require assessment of large industrial sources to determine
whether individual sources within a facility can cost - effectively reduce greenhouse
23 California Air Resources Board. Scoping Plan Measures Implementation Timeline. October 2010.
52 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
gas emissions and provide other pollution reduction co- benefits. Reduce greenhouse
gas emissions from fugitive emissions from oil and gas extraction and gas
transmission. Adopt and implement regulations to control fugitive methane
emissions and reduce flaring at refineries. These measures are applicable to large
industrial facilities (> 500,000 MTCO2E /YR) and other intensive uses such as
refineries. The proposed Housing Element will not result in the development of
these facilities and therefore would not interfere with implementation.
12. High Speed Rail. Support implementation of a high speed rail system. This is not
applicable as the Housing Element has no bearing on high speed rail facilities.
13. Green Building Strategy. Expand the use of green building practices to reduce the
carbon footprint of California's new and existing inventory of buildings. The
Baldwin Park Housing Element promotes energy efficient building design as well as
implementation of existing building and other codes regulating minimum energy,
water, and waste efficiency consistent with 2011 CALGREEN requirements and
would thus be consistent and not interfere with this program.
14. High Global Warming Potential Gases. Adopt measures to reduce high global
warming potential gases. The proposed Housing Element would not directly result
in generation of high global warming potential gases, and would not interfere with
implementation of any future changes in air conditioning, fire protection
suppressant, or other emission requirements.
15. Recycling and Waste. Reduce methane emissions at landfills. Increase waste
diversion, composting and other beneficial uses of organic materials, and mandate
commercial recycling to move toward zero - waste. The proposed Housing Element
is consistent because implementing housing development will be required to recycle
a minimum of 50 percent from construction activities per State requirements.
16. Sustainable Forests. Preserve forest sequestration and encourage the use of forest
biomass for sustainable energy generation. The 2020 target for carbon sequestration
is 5 million MTCO2E /YR. This is not applicable as the City does not contain any
areas defined as forest.
17. Water. Continue efficiency programs and use cleaner energy sources to move and
treat water. The proposed Housing Element is consistent since implementing
development will include use of low -flow fixtures and water- efficient landscaping
per State and local requirements.
18. Agriculture. In the near -term, encourage investment in manure digesters and at the
five -year Scoping Plan update determine if the program should be made mandatory
by 2020. The proposed Housing Element does not involve any agricultural activity.
As summarized above, the proposed Housing Element will potentially conflict with
Regional Transportation- Related GHG targets, but would not conflict with any of the
other provisions of the Scoping Plan. The proposed Housing Element in fact supports
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 53
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
four of the action categories through energy efficiency, green building, recycling/ waste,
and water conservation through these proposed and current policies.
Regional Transportation Plan /Sustainable Communities Strategy (SB375)
The 2012 Regional Transportation Plan/ Sustainable Communities Strategy and the
goals, policies, and programs included within it are projected to obtain and exceed
applicable GHG reduction targets of eight percent by 2020 and 13 percent by 2035.
Projected reductions by the RTP /SCS are nine percent by 2020 and 16 percent by 2035.
Ultimately, the RTP /SCS is keyed to implement the requirements of AB32 at the
regional level. For a program -level analysis, if the proposed Housing Element is
consistent with the assumptions of the RTP /SCS, then long -term development within
the planning area will meet regional reduction targets. Furthermore, long -term
development would meet the broader statewide reduction goals of 1990 levels by 2020
and 80 percent beyond that by 2050. The proposed Housing Element would, therefore,
not contribute substantially to climate change impacts if it is consistent with the regional
and statewide climate change planning efforts.
As assumed in the RTP /SCS, based on current City boundaries, Baldwin Park is forecast
to grow to a total population of 78,200 by 2020 and 82,200 by 2035. The ultimate build -
out of the proposed General Plan land use plan can accommodate a total population of
85,291. The proposed Housing Element and opportunity sites are projected to meet the
City's allocated RHNA, which is a function of the City's projected long -term growth.
Therefore, by providing sites to accommodate the RHNA, the Housing Element is
contributing short -term towards consistency with long -term growth projections and the
RTP /SCS. Therefore, the existing General Plan and proposed Housing Element are
consistent with the population growth forecasts of the RTP /SCS because they provide
the capacity for residential development to accommodate the projected population
growth and not direct growth elsewhere, which would interfere with implementation of
the RTP/ SCS.
The Housing Element includes a section discussing potential energy conservation
opportunities, including increased densities around the City's Metrolink station and
mixed use development. Additionally, Southern California Edison offers various rebate
programs for energy efficient appliances and makes available to residents energy efficient
kits at no cost. Housing implementation programs include efforts to promote energy
efficiency improvements to households, as well as energy efficient housing design and
practices in City ordinances. Impacts will be less than significant.
54 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
YOU I 1 914
Would the project:
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 55
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant
Significant
Impact
Impact
with
Impact
Mitigation
Incorporation
a) Create a significant hazard to the public
or the environment through the routine
❑
El
❑
transport, use, or disposal of hazardous
materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public
or the environment through reasonably
foreseeable upset and accident
El
El
❑
conditions involving the release of
hazardous materials into the
environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle
hazardous or acutely hazardous
materials, substances, or waste within
❑
❑
one - quarter mile of an existing or
proposed school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on
a list of hazardous materials sites
compiled pursuant to Government Code
ED
❑
®
❑
Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it
create a significant hazard to the public
or the environment?
e) For a project located within an airport
land use plan or, where such a plan has
not been adopted, within two miles of a
public airport or public use airport,
❑
❑
❑
would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working in
the project area?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a
private airstrip, would the project result
❑
❑
❑
in a safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area?
g) Impair implementation of or physically
interfere with an adopted emergency
El
❑
response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 55
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Would the project:
a -b) No Impact. The Baldwin Park Housing Element is a policy document intended to
facilitate maintenance of the existing housing stock and production of new housing to
meet the targeted housing needs of the community. Residential development does not
require and is not expected to require the manufacturing, use, transportation, disposal,
or storage of dangerous quantities of hazardous materials. Residential uses do not
generate hazardous wastes or emissions, except for very small quantities of typical
household cleaning agents, automotive maintenance products, paints, pesticides, and
herbicides. The proposed Housing Element would not conflict with any hazardous
materials regulations and would not exempt any future housing from the City's
programs to control and safely dispose of hazardous materials and wastes or to reduce
the volume of wastes requiring landfill disposal. Thus, no impact will result.
C) No Impact. Future residential development that may be facilitated by this Housing
Element update would not generate hazardous air emissions and would not involve the
handling of any acutely hazardous substances or wastes. Thus, the updated Housing
Element would not result in impacts related to the presence of any hazardous materials
or emissions within one quarter mile of a school. No impact would occur.
d) Less Than Significant Impact. According to the databases maintained as the Cortese
List, none of the Opportunity Sites identified in the Housing Element update are
identified on the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Hazardous Waste and
Substances Site List or the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) list of cleanup
sites.24 However, there are two concerns related to the exposure of hazardous materials.
One concern is potential soil and/or groundwater contamination due to a leaking
underground storage tank (LUST) adjacent to one of the potential residential sites along
Los Angeles Street. The LUST site is OSFA Enterprises located at 13623 Los Angeles
Street. A site assessment was performed in September 1989, but no further action is
noted.25 Any future housing development at the adjacent potential residential site is
subject to the City's standard environmental review process that will include
24 California Environmental Protection Agency. Cortese List Data Resources/
www. calepa. ca.gov /SiteCleanup /CorteseList/ [March 2013].
25 California Station Water Resources Control Board. GeoTracker.
https:/ /geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ [March 2013].
56 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant
Significant
Impact
Impact
with
Impact
Mitigation
Incorporation
h) Expose people or structures to a
significant risk of loss, injury or death
involving wildland fires, including
El
where wildlands are adjacent to
urbanized areas or where residences are
intermixed with wildlands?
a -b) No Impact. The Baldwin Park Housing Element is a policy document intended to
facilitate maintenance of the existing housing stock and production of new housing to
meet the targeted housing needs of the community. Residential development does not
require and is not expected to require the manufacturing, use, transportation, disposal,
or storage of dangerous quantities of hazardous materials. Residential uses do not
generate hazardous wastes or emissions, except for very small quantities of typical
household cleaning agents, automotive maintenance products, paints, pesticides, and
herbicides. The proposed Housing Element would not conflict with any hazardous
materials regulations and would not exempt any future housing from the City's
programs to control and safely dispose of hazardous materials and wastes or to reduce
the volume of wastes requiring landfill disposal. Thus, no impact will result.
C) No Impact. Future residential development that may be facilitated by this Housing
Element update would not generate hazardous air emissions and would not involve the
handling of any acutely hazardous substances or wastes. Thus, the updated Housing
Element would not result in impacts related to the presence of any hazardous materials
or emissions within one quarter mile of a school. No impact would occur.
d) Less Than Significant Impact. According to the databases maintained as the Cortese
List, none of the Opportunity Sites identified in the Housing Element update are
identified on the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Hazardous Waste and
Substances Site List or the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) list of cleanup
sites.24 However, there are two concerns related to the exposure of hazardous materials.
One concern is potential soil and/or groundwater contamination due to a leaking
underground storage tank (LUST) adjacent to one of the potential residential sites along
Los Angeles Street. The LUST site is OSFA Enterprises located at 13623 Los Angeles
Street. A site assessment was performed in September 1989, but no further action is
noted.25 Any future housing development at the adjacent potential residential site is
subject to the City's standard environmental review process that will include
24 California Environmental Protection Agency. Cortese List Data Resources/
www. calepa. ca.gov /SiteCleanup /CorteseList/ [March 2013].
25 California Station Water Resources Control Board. GeoTracker.
https:/ /geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ [March 2013].
56 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
identification of any contaminated sites and implementation of appropriate cleanup and
disposal procedures, if needed.
e) No Impact. The City of Baldwin Park is not located within an airport land use plan
influence area. The El Monte Airport is located approximately 1.8 miles from the
southwestern border of the city, but none of the Opportunity Sites are located within
two miles of the airport. No impact will occur.26
f) No Impact. There are no private airstrips within the vicinity of the City of Baldwin
Park. There will be no impact.2728
g) . No Impact. The Baldwin Park General Plan establishes policies regarding adequate
emergency response in the event of a disaster, including Safety Policy 1.3 that requires
the implementation of emergency procedures contained in the City's Multi- hazard
Functional Plan and Supplemental Emergency Preparedness Plans. The Housing
Element update would not change or interfere with the emergency response plans of the
City and does not propose any alteration to vehicle circulation routes that could
interfere with such plans. In accordance with City policies, the City will review all
development proposals to determine the possible impacts of each development on
emergency services.
Policy 1.3 Continue to implement emergency procedures contained in the City's
Multi- hazard Functional Plan and Supplemental Emergency
Preparedness Plans.
h) No Impact. Baldwin Park is not located within a Fire Hazard Severity Zone, as
documented on the latest maps prepared by the California Department of Forestry and
Fire Protection.29 Due to the urban character of Baldwin Park and the surrounding area,
there are no wildland conditions in the City. No impact will occur.
26 Los Angeles Department of Regional. Planning. Airport Land Use Commission.
http : / /planning.lacoun!y.gov /aluc /mats [January 2013].
27 Los Angeles Department of Regional Planning. Airport Land Use Commission.
http: / /planning.lacounty. ov /aluc /.mats [January 2013].
28 Federal Aviation Administration. Airports Facilities Data.
http: / /www.faa. o� v /airports /airport safety/ airportdata 5010 /menu /index.cfm (January 2013].
29 California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. Fire Hazard Severity Zones Maps.
http: / /www.fire.ca.gov /fire prevention/ fire prevention wildland zones.php [January 20131.
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 57
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Would the project:
58 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant
Significant
Impact
Impact
with
Impact
Mitigation
Incorporation
a) Violate any water quality standards or
❑
❑
®
❑
waste discharge requirements?
b) Substantially deplete groundwater
supplies or interfere substantially with
groundwater recharge such that there
would be a net deficit in aquifer volume
or a lowering of the local groundwater
E]
❑
®
❑
table level (e.g., the production rate of
pre - existing nearby wells would drop to
a Ievel which would not support existing
land uses or planned uses for which
permits have been granted)?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage
pattern of the site or area, including
through the alteration of the course of a
❑
❑
®
❑
stream or river, in a manner that would
result in substantial erosion or siltation
on- or off -site?
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage
pattern of the site or area, including
through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, or substantially increase
❑
❑
®
❑
the rate or amount of surface runoff in a
manner which would result in flooding
on- or off -site?
e) Create or contribute runoff water which
would exceed the capacity of existing or
planned stormwater drainage systems or
❑
❑
®
❑
provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff?
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water
❑
El
❑
quality?
58 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
a) Less Than Significant Impact. The project is a policy document that facilitates the
production of housing and does not include any components that would change or
conflict with water quality regulations or any waste discharge standards. All new
development projects must comply with the City's local procedures to control storm
water runoff to prevent violations of regional water quality standards, in accordance
with its co- permittee obligations under the countywide municipal storm water permit
program, a component of the NPDES program of the federal Clean Water Act. New
housing projects would be required to comply with Chapter 52 of the Municipal Code,
which contains regulations to meet federal and State water quality requirements related
to storm water runoff. General Plan Open Space and Conservation Policy 5.4 requires
the continued enforcement of municipal NPDES Permit to protect and improve the
quality of local and regional groundwater resources available to the City. Impacts will
be less than significant.
Policy 5.4 Continue enforcement of municipal National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) Permit to protect water quality within the
San Gabriel River watershed.
b) Less Than Significant Impact. Potable water in Baldwin Park is provided by three
water companies: Valley County Water District (VCWD), San Gabriel Valley Water
Company, and Valley View Mutual Water Company (VMWC). VCWD is the largest
water supplier in the City and serves approximately 55,000 people in parts of Baldwin
Park and neighboring cities. Its main water source is wells beneath the district's service
area from the Upper San Gabriel Groundwater Basin, including four wells in Baldwin
Park. The San Gabriel Valley Water Company supplies water exclusively from
groundwater wells to customers in Baldwin Park and surrounding cities. Most of the
wells are located in Baldwin Park and El Monte, and six of the company's reservoirs
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 59
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant
Significant
Impact
Impact
with
Impact
Mitigation
Incorporation
g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood
hazard area as mapped on a federal
Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
❑
❑
❑
Insurance Rate Map or other flood
hazard delineation map?
h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard
area structures which would impede or
❑
❑
®
❑
redirect flood flows?
i) Expose people or structures to a
significant risk of loss, injury or death
❑
❑
®
❑
involving flooding, including flooding as
a result of the failure of a levee or dam?
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or
❑
❑
❑
mudflow?
a) Less Than Significant Impact. The project is a policy document that facilitates the
production of housing and does not include any components that would change or
conflict with water quality regulations or any waste discharge standards. All new
development projects must comply with the City's local procedures to control storm
water runoff to prevent violations of regional water quality standards, in accordance
with its co- permittee obligations under the countywide municipal storm water permit
program, a component of the NPDES program of the federal Clean Water Act. New
housing projects would be required to comply with Chapter 52 of the Municipal Code,
which contains regulations to meet federal and State water quality requirements related
to storm water runoff. General Plan Open Space and Conservation Policy 5.4 requires
the continued enforcement of municipal NPDES Permit to protect and improve the
quality of local and regional groundwater resources available to the City. Impacts will
be less than significant.
Policy 5.4 Continue enforcement of municipal National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) Permit to protect water quality within the
San Gabriel River watershed.
b) Less Than Significant Impact. Potable water in Baldwin Park is provided by three
water companies: Valley County Water District (VCWD), San Gabriel Valley Water
Company, and Valley View Mutual Water Company (VMWC). VCWD is the largest
water supplier in the City and serves approximately 55,000 people in parts of Baldwin
Park and neighboring cities. Its main water source is wells beneath the district's service
area from the Upper San Gabriel Groundwater Basin, including four wells in Baldwin
Park. The San Gabriel Valley Water Company supplies water exclusively from
groundwater wells to customers in Baldwin Park and surrounding cities. Most of the
wells are located in Baldwin Park and El Monte, and six of the company's reservoirs
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 59
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
serve Baldwin Park. VVWD supplies water to approximately eight percent of Baldwin
Park's population.
VCWD has not reached its maximum capacity for water production from wells.
Baldwin Park makes up approximately 48 percent of the VCWD. Total water use in 2010
was 8,313 acre feet per year (AFY) for the entire VCWD service area in 2010 and is
projected to increase to 9,536 AFY in 2025. According to the 2010 Urban Water
Management Plan, VCWD is capable of meeting all demand scenarios with its current
supply including normal year, single dry year, and multiple dry year supply and
demand conditions.30
The Urban Water Management Plan indicated that sufficient water supplies are
available to protect existing and future water needs within the VCWD service area. The
existing water supply is sufficient to meet widespread demand without substantially
lowering groundwater levels. The City has identified the protection and conservation of
its existing and future water resources within the General Plan policies listed below.
Impacts related to groundwater recharge and depletion will be less than significant.
Policy 5.1 Encourage water conservation through education, use of drought tolerant
landscapes, and water - conserving technology.
Policy 5.2 Promote the use of native plant material in landscapes and drought
tolerant trees, especially in landscapes on City properties.
Policy 5.3 Encourage the use and production of reclaimed water.
c) Less Than Significant Impact. The City of Baldwin Park is largely developed. Wind
and water both cause erosion that could be deposited in local or regional washes and
other water bodies. Due to the urbanized nature of the City, future housing
development will not substantially alter the drainage pattern of the area, and will not
result in substantial erosion or siltation on or off site. Future housing development on
the Opportunity Sites and other housing development and redevelopment constructed
pursuant to Housing Element policies will be required to implement standard on -site
drainage controls and storm water conveyance devices to direct any drainage
appropriately, during construction and operation of future housing. Impacts related to
erosion and siltation will be less than significant.
d) Less Than Significant Impact. Due to the developed nature of the City and the
Opportunity Sites, future housing development will not substantially alter the drainage
pattern of the area, and will not substantially increase the rate of surface run -off that will
cause flooding on or off site. Thus, impacts associated with on- or off -site flooding will
be less than significant.
e) Less Than Significant Impact. Residential development typically does not generate
significant water pollutants through point discharges but does contribute to water
quality impacts due to community -wide and regional urban runoff. New development
projects associated with the implementation of the proposed Housing Element would be
30 CIVILTEC Engineering Inc. Valley County Water District 2010 Urban Water Management Plan. June
2011,
60 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
required to ensure project- specific and citywide drainage systems have adequate
capacity to accommodate new development. The Zoning Code includes design and
maintenance guidelines such as requiring parking lots to be designed in a manner that
collects surface runoff consistent with the requirements of the NPDES permit.
Compliance with the City's Municipal Code Chapter 52: Storm Water and Urban Runoff
Pollution Prevention and the Zoning Code design standards relating to drainage will
ensure drainage system capacity impacts are less than significant.
i No Impact. The proposed Housing Element does not authorize construction or
redevelopment of any housing and would not result in any new or more extensive
sources of water pollutants. No other impacts to water quality will occur.
g) No Impact. The City is not located within a 100 -year flood hazard area. No impact
would occur.31
h) Less Than Significant Impact. The City is not located within a 100 -year flood hazard
area. Future housing development will be reviewed at the individual project level to
ensure that structures would not impede or redirect flood flows; therefore, impacts will
be less than significant.32
i) Less Than Significant Impact. The City could be subject to inundation if the Santa Fe
Dam were to fail. The Army Corps of Engineers flood emergency plan data indicate that
failure of the Santa Fe Dam would result in the entire City of Baldwin Park being
flooded. Water depths would range from 2 to 12 feet, with shallow depths located at a
farther distance from the dam. According to the Baldwin Park General Plan, flooding as
a result of the failure of this dam is considered unlikely due to the method of
construction and the dam's past performance during previous earthquakes. Thus, less
than significant impacts are anticipated. The goals and policies of the General Plan
serve to reduce potential impacts related to flooding. Furthermore, flooding risk is
addressed in the City's Multihazard Functional Plan and Supplemental Emergency
Preparedness Plans. Compliance with the General Plan goals and policies and the City's
Multihazard Functional Plan and Supplemental Emergency Preparedness Plans would
reduce flood impacts to less than significant.
Goal 2.0 Protect Baldwin Park residents, the work force, and visitors from flood
hazards.
Policy 2.1 Work in cooperation with the Los Angeles County Department of
Public Works to identify and construct needed local and regional
storm drain improvements to relieve localized flooding problems.
Policy 2.2 Maintain the City's Multihazard Functional Plan and
Supplemental Emergency Preparedness Plans in a current and
continual state of readiness to respond to flooding, as well as
other emergencies.
31 City of Baldwin Park, General Plan. September 2002.
32 City of Baldwin Park. General Plan. September 2002.
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 61
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
j) No Impact. A tsunami is a large wave that generates in the ocean, generally from an
earthquake, and builds intense strength and height before impacting a coast. Baldwin
Park is not subject to impacts from a tsunami because it is not located near an ocean or
sea. A seiche is the process by which water sloshes outside its containing boundaries,
generally due to an earthquake. This generally occurs with uncovered, above - ground
reservoirs. According to the General Plan, Baldwin Park is not exposed to seiche
hazards the project area is not located near a lake, reservoir, or other open body of
water. Mudflows require a slope, water, and unconsolidated soil to occur. The project
area is not subject to mudflows because the Opportunity Sites and their surroundings do
not contain steep slopes. No impacts will occur.
62 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
3-10- LAND USE AND PLANNING
Would the project:
a) No Impact. The proposed Housing Element sets forth policies to encourage housing
development. Housing Element implementation will not provide for new infrastructure
systems such as new roadways or flood control channels that would divide or disrupt
established neighborhoods, considering the built -out and urbanized character of the
City. No impact would occur.
b) No Impact. The Baldwin Park Housing Element sets forth policies to encourage housing
development consistent with adopted land use policies established in the General Plan.
The Housing Element does not include any goals, policies, or programs that would
conflict with adopted General Plan goals and policies to mitigate environmental effects.
No impact would occur.
c) No Impact. According to the Conservation Plans and Agreements database, there are
no Habitat Conservation Plans or Natural Community Conservation Plans located in
Baldwin Park.33 No impact could occur.
33 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. Conservation Plans and Agreements Database.
http:/ /ecos.fws.gov /consery _plans /public.jsp Qanuary 2013].
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 63
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant
Significant
Impact
Impact
with
Impact
Mitigation
Incorporation
a) Physically divide an established
❑
El
❑
community?
b) Conflict with any applicable land use
plan, policy, or regulation of an agency
with jurisdiction over the project
(including, but not limited to the general
❑
❑
❑
plan, specific plan, local coastal
program, or zoning ordinance) adopted
for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating
an environmental effect?
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat
conservation plan or natural community
❑
❑
❑
conservation plan?
a) No Impact. The proposed Housing Element sets forth policies to encourage housing
development. Housing Element implementation will not provide for new infrastructure
systems such as new roadways or flood control channels that would divide or disrupt
established neighborhoods, considering the built -out and urbanized character of the
City. No impact would occur.
b) No Impact. The Baldwin Park Housing Element sets forth policies to encourage housing
development consistent with adopted land use policies established in the General Plan.
The Housing Element does not include any goals, policies, or programs that would
conflict with adopted General Plan goals and policies to mitigate environmental effects.
No impact would occur.
c) No Impact. According to the Conservation Plans and Agreements database, there are
no Habitat Conservation Plans or Natural Community Conservation Plans located in
Baldwin Park.33 No impact could occur.
33 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. Conservation Plans and Agreements Database.
http:/ /ecos.fws.gov /consery _plans /public.jsp Qanuary 2013].
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 63
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
7 sm
Would the project:
a) No Impact. State guidelines require that Baldwin Park and other cities establish policies
within their General Plans to manage identified mineral resource areas of statewide or
regional significance. The location and level of importance of these mineral resource
areas is determined by the state Division of Mines and Geology. Since 19 82, all of
Baldwin Park has been designated by the State Geologist as a. Mineral Resource Zone 2
(MRZ -2) where "adequate information indicates that significant mineral deposits are
present or where it is judged that a high likelihood for their presence exists." Given the
MRZ -2 designation and the active extraction activities in surrounding areas, it is highly
likely that mineral resources exist in Baldwin Park. However, the City is largely built
out with urban uses that are incompatible with mineral extraction and /or surface
mining activities. Thus, General Plan policy does not provide for mining activity to
occur. In a regional context, potential resources in Baldwin Park are limited in extent
and inaccessible due to urbanization; thus, impacts on aggregate resources are not
considered significant.3
b) No Impact. Neither the General Plan nor any other City planning document identifies
any locally important mineral resource recovery sites within the City. No impact could
occur.35
34 City of Baldwin Park. General Plan Environmental Impact Report. September 2002.
35 City of Baldwin Park. General Plan. Environmental Impact Report. September 2002.
64 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant
Significant
Impact
Impact
with
Impact
Mitigation
Incorporation
a) Result in the loss of availability of a
known mineral resource that would be
❑
❑
❑
of value to the region and the residents
of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a
locally important mineral resource
recovery site delineated on a local
El
0
general plan, specific plan or other land
use plan?
a) No Impact. State guidelines require that Baldwin Park and other cities establish policies
within their General Plans to manage identified mineral resource areas of statewide or
regional significance. The location and level of importance of these mineral resource
areas is determined by the state Division of Mines and Geology. Since 19 82, all of
Baldwin Park has been designated by the State Geologist as a. Mineral Resource Zone 2
(MRZ -2) where "adequate information indicates that significant mineral deposits are
present or where it is judged that a high likelihood for their presence exists." Given the
MRZ -2 designation and the active extraction activities in surrounding areas, it is highly
likely that mineral resources exist in Baldwin Park. However, the City is largely built
out with urban uses that are incompatible with mineral extraction and /or surface
mining activities. Thus, General Plan policy does not provide for mining activity to
occur. In a regional context, potential resources in Baldwin Park are limited in extent
and inaccessible due to urbanization; thus, impacts on aggregate resources are not
considered significant.3
b) No Impact. Neither the General Plan nor any other City planning document identifies
any locally important mineral resource recovery sites within the City. No impact could
occur.35
34 City of Baldwin Park. General Plan Environmental Impact Report. September 2002.
35 City of Baldwin Park. General Plan. Environmental Impact Report. September 2002.
64 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
3.12 - NOISE
Would the project result in:
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 65
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant
Significant
Impact
Impact
with
Impact
Mitigation
Incorporation
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of
noise levels in excess of standards
established in the local general plan or
El
El
®
❑
noise ordinance, or applicable standards
of other agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of
excessive ground -borne vibration or
ground -borne noise levels?
c) A substantial permanent increase in
ambient noise levels in the project
❑
a
®
❑
vicinity above levels existing without the
project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic
increase in ambient noise levels in the
❑
®
❑
project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
e) For a project located within an airport
land use plan or, where such a plan has
not been adopted, within two miles of a
public airport or public use airport,
E
would the project expose people residing
or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a
private airstrip, would the project expose
El
❑
❑
people residing or working in the project
area to excessive noise levels?
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 65
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Fundamentals of Sound and Environmental Noise
Noise can be defined as unwanted sound. The primary sources of noise affecting Baldwin Park
stem from various modes of transportation. Because the City is fully urbanized, the
predominant noise source in the community is traffic noise.
Sound (and therefore noise) consists of energy waves that people receive and interpret. Sound
pressure levels are described in logarithmic units of ratios of sound pressures to a reference
pressure, squared. These units are called bets. In order to provide a finer description of sound,
a bet is subdivided into ten decibels, abbreviated dB. To account for the range of sound that
human hearing perceives, a modified scale is utilized known as the A- weighted decibel (dBA).
Since decibels are logarithmic units, sound pressure levels cannot be added or subtracted by
ordinary arithmetic means. For example, if one automobile produces a sound pressure level of
70 dBA when it passes an observer, two cars passing simultaneously would not produce 140 dB.
In fact, they would combine to produce 73 dBA. This same principle can be applied to other
traffic quantities as well. In other words, doubling the traffic volume on a street or the speed of
the traffic will increase the traffic noise level by 3 dBA. Conversely, halving the traffic volume
or speed will reduce the traffic noise level by 3 dBA. A 3 dBA change in sound is the level
where humans generally notice a barely perceptible change in sound and a 5 dBA change is
generally readily perceptible.36
Noise consists of pitch, loudness, and duration; therefore, a variety of methods for measuring
noise has been developed. According to the California General Plan Guidelines for Noise
Elements, the following are common metrics for measuring noise:37
LEQ (Equivalent Energy Noise Level): The sound level corresponding to a steady -state
sound level containing the same total energy as a time- varying signal over given sample
periods. LEQ is typically computed over 1 -, 8 -, and 24 -hour sample periods.
CNEL (Community Noise Equivalent Level): The average equivalent A- weighted sound
level during a 24 -hour day, obtained after addition of five decibels to sound levels in the
evening from 7:00 P.M. to 10:00 P.M. and after addition of ten decibels to sound levels in the
night from 10:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M..
LDN (Day -Night Average Level): The average equivalent A- weighted sound level during a
24 -hour day, obtained after the addition of ten decibels to sound levels in the night after
10:00 P.M. and before 7:00 A.M..
CNEL and LDN are utilized for describing ambient noise levels because they account for all noise
sources over an extended period of time and account for the heightened sensitivity of people to
noise during the night. LEQ is better utilized for describing specific and consistent sources
because of the shorter reference period.
36 California Department of Transportation. Basics of Highway Noise: Technical Noise Supplement.
November 2009.
37 California Governor's Office of Planning and Research. General Plan Guidelines. 2003.
66 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Fundamentals of Environmental Ground -borne Vibration
Vibration is sound radiated through the ground. The rumbling sound caused by the vibration of
room surfaces is called ground -borne noise. The ground motion caused by vibration is
measured as particle velocity in inches per second, and in the U.S. is referenced as vibration
decibels (VdB).
The background vibration velocity level in residential and educational areas is usually around
50 VdB. The vibration velocity level threshold of perception for humans is approximately 65
VdB. A vibration velocity level of 75 VdB is the approximately dividing line between barely
perceptible and distinctly perceptible levels for many people. Sources within buildings such as
operation of mechanical equipment, movement of people, or the slamming of doors causes most
perceptible indoor vibration. Typical outdoor sources of perceptible ground -borne vibration are
construction equipment, steel - wheeled trains, and traffic on rough roads. If a roadway is
smooth, the ground -borne vibration from traffic is rarely perceptible. The range of interest is
from approximately 50 VdB, which is the typical background vibration velocity level, and 100
VdB, which is the general threshold where minor damage can occur in fragile buildings.
The general human response to different levels of ground -borne vibration velocity levels is
described in Table 9 (Human Reaction to Vibration).
Table 9
Human Reaction to Vibration
Source: Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, May 2006
a) Less Than Significant Impact. The primary contributor to ambient noise in the
planning area is traffic, particularly from major roadways such as Interstate 10 (1 -10) and
Interstate 605 (1 -605). To determine if future housing at the proposed Opportunity Sites
would be exposed to ambient noise levels in excess of the noise level standards
established in Baldwin Park, noise levels from future traffic volumes have been
estimated and compared to the City's noise level standards. The Baldwin Park General
Plan identifies standards for residential land uses and noise compatibility, as
summarized in Table 10 (Noise Ordinance Standards).
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 67
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Table 10
Noise Ordinance Standards
Source: City of Baldwin Park, Zoning Code, April 2012
The mixed -use Opportunity Sites are located along major roads and corridors. Existing
traffic volumes along the major roads and corridors are documented in the General Plan
EIR. The noise analysis prepared for the Baldwin Park General Plan EIR analyzed noise
along major corridors. Future traffic noise along roadway segments affecting the
Opportunity Sites are summarized in Table 11 (Noise Impact from General Plan and
Cumulative Traffic).
Table 11
Noise Impact from General Plan and Cumulative Traffic
Source: City of Baldurin Park. General Plan Environmental Impact Report, September 2002.
Noise along the roadways listed in Table 11 will exceed exterior noise thresholds at
General Plan build -out. Future development will be subject to standard environmental
review pursuant to CEQA and the City's local implementation procedures. This
typically includes preparation of a project - specific noise impact analysis to determine if
the development will be exposed to excessive noise levels and identify appropriate
mitigation. The most common type of exterior mitigation involves barriers that could
include walls. Interior noise levels will be controlled through common building
techniques, particularly in specifying window requirements with minimum standard
transmission coefficient. California law establishes interior noise standards for
multifamily housing at 45 dB(A), and any such projects will be required to achieve this
standard. Impacts related to exposure of persons to ambient noise levels in excess of
68 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
identified standards will be less than significant with implementation of the noise
policies in the Baldwin Park General Plan and Zoning Code.
The 24 -hour noise measurement program for train noise shows that when trains passed
without blowing their horns they generated maximum noise levels ranging from 84 to 89
dBA. Land uses adjacent the Metrolink track, which includes three of the mixed -use
Opportunity Sites, will continue to be primarily residential and public. These uses will
be exposed to periodic train noise. In addition, mixed -use Opportunity Sites E, F, and J
are located adjacent to the Baldwin Park Metrolink station. These sites will be exposed
to train noise as well as noise associated with cars entering and exiting the parking lot.
Future housing developments on the proposed Opportunity Sites and in other areas of
the City are subject to the policies of the existing General Plan designed to minimize
noise impacts to residential properties. The following noise policies of the General Plan
will be implemented during the City's standard environmental review process during
the entitlement process for future housing developments. Impacts to residential
development related to noise levels in excess of established standards and permanent
increase in ambient noise will be less than significant with implementation of General
Plan policies, Zoning Code requirements, and State interior noise standards for
multifamily housing.
Policy 1.2 Require noise - reduction techniques in site planning, architectural design,
and construction where noise reduction is necessary. Provide noise
control measures such as berms, walls, and sound attenuating
construction in areas of new construction.
Policy 1.3 Promote acceptable noise levels near schools, hospitals, convalescent
homes, and other noise - sensitive areas.
Policy 1.4 Establish targeted limits of noise for various land uses throughout the
community.
Policy 2.3 Require that landscaped buffers be created between a commercial or
mixed -use structure and an adjoining residential parcel.
Goal 3.0 Minimize the noise impacts associated with the development of
residential units above ground -floor commercial uses in mixed -use
developments.
Policy 3.1 Require that commercial uses developed as part of a mixed -use project
with residential uses not be noise intrusive.
Policy 3.2 Require that mixed -use structures be designed to prevent transfer of
noise and vibration from the commercial to the residential use.
Policy 3.3 Orient mixed -use residential units away from major noise sources.
Policy 3.4 Locate balconies and windows of residential units in mixed -use projects
away from the primary street and other major noise sources.
Goal 4.0 Reduce noise impacts from transportation noise sources.
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 69
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Policy 4.1 Require construction of acoustically effective and aesthetically pleasing
barriers to shield noise - sensitive uses from excessive noise where
necessary or where feasible.
Policy 4.2 Enforce City, State, and federal noise standards, especially those for
mufflers and modified exhaust systems.
Policy 4.3 Reduce transportation noise through proper design and coordination of
routing.
Policy 4.4 Reduce Metrolink train noise through coordination of scheduling with
responsible rail authorities.
Policy 4.5 Work cooperatively with Metrolink operators to identify areas of
excessive train noise, and develop a mitigation program to achieve noise
reduction.
b) Less Than Significant Impact. Vibration can impact people, structures, and sensitive
equipment. The primary concern related to vibration and people is the potential to
annoy those working and residing in the area. Vibration with high enough amplitudes
can damage structures (such as crack plaster or destroy windows). Ground -borne
vibration can also disrupt the use of sensitive medical and scientific instruments such as
electron microscopes. Implementation of the proposed Housing Element will not
include uses that cause vibration; however, the San Bernardino Metrolink line runs
adjacent to three of the Mixed -Use Opportunity Sites.
The San Bernardino Metrolink line that runs on the Union Pacific Railway goes through
the southeastern portion of Baldwin Park between Maine Avenue and Vineland Avenue.
Opportunity Sites E, F, and J are adjacent to the track, exposing future residents to
potential ground -borne vibration from the Metrolink. The Federal Transit
Administration's (FTA) Vibration Screening Procedure was applied to the nearest
railway to determine whether potential exists for railway vibration to substantially
impact future development at Opportunity Sites E, F, and J. Pursuant to the screening
procedure, Category 2 land uses (residences and buildings where people normally
sleep) located 200 feet or closer have the potential of being substantially impacted by
Conventional Commuter Railroad vibration impacts.38 The railway is less than 200 feet
from the nearest property lines of Opportunity Sites E, F, and J. Because the proposed
Housing Element does not approve the development of these sites, vibration impacts
and possible mitigation at these sites will be evaluated on a project -by- project basis.
One of the most effective ways to reduce ground -borne vibration is to properly maintain
wheels and track. However, this responsibility lies with the train operator and is out of
the City's control. The City does have the ability to mitigate vibration impact by
requiring building foundation supports on elastomer pads.39 As a practice, the City has
not required such mitigation for projects constructed near the Metrolink right -of -way.
Ground -borne vibration generated by construction projects is usually highest during
pile driving, rock blasting, soil compacting, jack - hammering, and demolition- related
activities. Next to pile driving, grading activity has the greatest potential for vibration
impacts if large bulldozers or large trucks are used. Residential units, once constructed,
38 Federal Transit Administration. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment. April 1995.
39 Federal Transit Administration. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment. April 1995.
70 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
do not utilize machinery that would generate substantial amounts of vibration.
However, the construction of future potential housing developments could utilize
machinery that would generate substantial amounts of ground vibration because
multiple -lot housing developments generally require mass grading. Construction of
future development is not likely to require rock blasting considering the built -out
character of the area or pile driving because the area is not subject to liquefaction
hazards; however, jack hammering will also likely be required for demolition activities.
Table 12 (Common Construction Vibration) summarizes vibration levels from common
construction equipment. Impacts to structures can occur from 0.08 PPV to 2.00 PPV
depending on the duration of the vibration and the age of the structure. Similarly,
human annoyance to vibration can occur from 0.01 PPV to 2.00 PPV depending on the
duration.
Table 12
Common Construction Vibration
Crack - and -Seat Operations
2.400
Vibratory Roller
0.210
Large Bulldozer
0.089
Caisson Drilling
0.089
Loaded Trucks
0.076
Jackhammer
0.035
Small Bulldozer
0.003
Source: California Department of Transportation 2004
Vibration impacts are temporary and rare except in cases where large equipment is used
near existing, occupied development. Construction noise and associated vibration will
be controlled through the time restrictions currently established in the City's Noise
Control requirements. Section 130.37E of the Municipal Code requires that construction
activity and equipment maintenance is limited to the hours between 7:00 A.M. to 7:00
P.M. These restrictions will minimize potential annoyance impacts to nearby residential
development during sensitive evening and noise hours. Noise and vibration impacts
will be evaluated on a project -by- project basis pursuant to CEQA and the City's local
implementation procedures. Vibration is difficult to control and the best methods for
mitigation are avoidance. Typical vibration mitigation includes routing and placement
of equipment to maximize distance to receptors and use of alternative equipment, such
as use of drilled pile drivers as opposed to impact drivers. Subsurface dampeners can
also be utilized to reduce ground -borne vibration. Impacts related to exposure to
ground -borne vibration will be less than significant with implementation of local
environmental review procedures.
c) Less Than Significant Impact. The project would create a significant noise impact if it
causes an adopted noise standard to be exceeded for the project site or for adjacent
receptors. It is also important to consider the existing noise environment. If the existing
noise environment is quiet and the new noise source greatly increases the noise
exposure, impacts will occur. Residential and mixed -use development on the
Opportunity Sites would be compatible with the surrounding uses that consist of
residential, commercial, and religious uses. The proposed Housing Element will not
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 71
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
increase residential densities or commercial intensities and therefore will not increase
ambient noise from traffic or operational sources beyond those analyzed in the General
Plan EIR. Thus, impacts will be less than significant.
d) Less Than Significant Impact. The updated Housing Element does not authorize the
development or redevelopment of housing units on any particular site but does include
policies that could facilitate development of future housing. Housing does not generate
substantial periodic noise. Typical periodic noise associated with housing is solid waste
pick -up and deliveries at commercial portions of mixed -use developments. These are
common noises in an urban setting. Temporary increase in local noise levels would be
associated with construction activities to develop new housing. Construction noise will
be controlled through the time restrictions currently established in the City's Noise
Control requirements (Section 130.37E of the Municipal Code). Furthermore, future
housing development will be subject to the City's standard environmental review
procedures to ensure that temporary and periodic noise is assessed and mitigated, if
necessary. Continued enforcement of the City's noise restrictions and environmental
review procedures will ensure temporary and periodic noise impacts associated with
new housing will be less than significant.
e) No Impact. None of the Opportunity Sites are located within an Airport Land Use Plan.
No impact will result.
f) No Impact. There are no private airstrips in the vicinity of Baldwin Park. No impact
will result
72 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
3.13 - POPULATION AND HOUSING
Would the project:
a) Less than Significant Impact. The proposed Housing Element will not directly induce
population growth. Population growth is a complex interaction among immigration,
emigration, birth, deaths, and economic factors. The proposed Housing Element is
designed to guide and accommodate the inevitable population growth the community
will face over the short and long terms. SCAG's 2012 Adopted Growth Forecast projects
a population of 82,200 by the year 2035 in Baldwin Park. The increase in population due
to future development at the Opportunity Sites is within the growth assumptions
estimated by SCAG. Therefore, implementation of the Housing Element will not induce
growth beyond that already planned. Impact will be less than significant.
b) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Housing Element is designed to
encourage and facilitate housing development and preserve and enhance existing
housing stock. The City is urbanized and largely built out. Few vacant parcels remain,
and some underutilized properties may be recycled for the purpose of developing new
housing and mixed -use. This natural recycling of land will not result in the loss of
housing units because such redevelopment will result in the development of new
housing units. Thus, the availability of residential units will increase as a result of the
Housing Element. Impact will be less than significant.
c) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Housing Element will not directly
displace any people because the project does not authorize the demolition or conversion
of any housing unit. Although housing units do currently exist on the Opportunity
Sites, the Housing Element does not authorize the acquisition of any existing residential
dwelling unit. In addition, these homes may be removed to accommodate higher-
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 73
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant
Significant
Impact
Impact
with
Impact
Mitigation
Incorporation
a) Induce substantial population growth in
an area, either directly (for example, by
proposing new homes and businesses)
El
❑
El
indirectly (for example, through
extension of roads or other
infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing
housing, necessitating the construction
El
0
of replacement housing elsewhere?
c) Displace substantial numbers of people,
necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?
a) Less than Significant Impact. The proposed Housing Element will not directly induce
population growth. Population growth is a complex interaction among immigration,
emigration, birth, deaths, and economic factors. The proposed Housing Element is
designed to guide and accommodate the inevitable population growth the community
will face over the short and long terms. SCAG's 2012 Adopted Growth Forecast projects
a population of 82,200 by the year 2035 in Baldwin Park. The increase in population due
to future development at the Opportunity Sites is within the growth assumptions
estimated by SCAG. Therefore, implementation of the Housing Element will not induce
growth beyond that already planned. Impact will be less than significant.
b) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Housing Element is designed to
encourage and facilitate housing development and preserve and enhance existing
housing stock. The City is urbanized and largely built out. Few vacant parcels remain,
and some underutilized properties may be recycled for the purpose of developing new
housing and mixed -use. This natural recycling of land will not result in the loss of
housing units because such redevelopment will result in the development of new
housing units. Thus, the availability of residential units will increase as a result of the
Housing Element. Impact will be less than significant.
c) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Housing Element will not directly
displace any people because the project does not authorize the demolition or conversion
of any housing unit. Although housing units do currently exist on the Opportunity
Sites, the Housing Element does not authorize the acquisition of any existing residential
dwelling unit. In addition, these homes may be removed to accommodate higher-
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 73
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
density residential development. Pursuant to State law, 60 days advanced written notice
is required for tenants living in the units for over a year or 30 days an advanced written
notice when the property owner opens escrow for sale of the site to the project
proponent.40 This will provide adequate time for occupants of existing housing to find
new housing. The proposed Housing Element will not influence economic factors, such
as the relocation of a large employment base to a different region that could require the
construction of new housing. Impact will be less than significant.
40 California Department of Consumer Affairs. California Tenants: A Guide to Residential Tenants' and
Landlords' Rights and Responsibilities. 2010.
74 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
3.14 - PUBLIC SERVICES
Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision
of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered
governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental
impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance
objectives for any of the public services:
a -e) Less Than Significant Impact. The Baldwin Park Housing Element update sets forth
policies and programs to encourage housing development consistent with adopted
General Plan land use polices. Residential development constructed pursuant to
Housing Element policy will incrementally increase the need for fire and police
protection, schools, and parks. SCAG estimates that the City's population will be 82,200
in 2035. The Housing Element's goal to facilitate 1,020 new units by 2021 would increase
the local housing stock from 17,736 as of 2010 (2010 Census count) to 18,756 units and
would increase the resident population by approximately 4,448 persons (1,020 dwelling
units at 4.36 persons per household).
The General Plan EIR indicates that build -out of the land use plan would result in
significant impacts to parks, schools, fire, police, and library services.
Parks
The provision of parks is guided by the policies of the General Plan Open Space and
Conservation Element that promotes the long -term increase in parkland and recreational
facilities implemented utilizing a number of financing strategies. The City requires
dedication of land or payment of a fee in lieu thereof or a combination of both as a
condition of approval for residential subdivisions. The purpose of the dedication
and/or fee is to provide parks and recreation facilities. Dedication and/or payment of
the fee would help to reduce potential impacts of future residential development on
parks and recreational facilities. In addition, the General Plan policies and
implementation measures will assist in reducing the impact on parks.
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 75
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant
Significant
Impact
Impact
with
Impact
Mitigation
Incorporation
a) Fire protection?
El
F]
®
El
b) Police protection?
0
®
El
c) Schools?
d) Parks?
El
El
e) Other public facilities?
El
E
®
El
a -e) Less Than Significant Impact. The Baldwin Park Housing Element update sets forth
policies and programs to encourage housing development consistent with adopted
General Plan land use polices. Residential development constructed pursuant to
Housing Element policy will incrementally increase the need for fire and police
protection, schools, and parks. SCAG estimates that the City's population will be 82,200
in 2035. The Housing Element's goal to facilitate 1,020 new units by 2021 would increase
the local housing stock from 17,736 as of 2010 (2010 Census count) to 18,756 units and
would increase the resident population by approximately 4,448 persons (1,020 dwelling
units at 4.36 persons per household).
The General Plan EIR indicates that build -out of the land use plan would result in
significant impacts to parks, schools, fire, police, and library services.
Parks
The provision of parks is guided by the policies of the General Plan Open Space and
Conservation Element that promotes the long -term increase in parkland and recreational
facilities implemented utilizing a number of financing strategies. The City requires
dedication of land or payment of a fee in lieu thereof or a combination of both as a
condition of approval for residential subdivisions. The purpose of the dedication
and/or fee is to provide parks and recreation facilities. Dedication and/or payment of
the fee would help to reduce potential impacts of future residential development on
parks and recreational facilities. In addition, the General Plan policies and
implementation measures will assist in reducing the impact on parks.
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 75
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Goal 3.0 Ensure that parks are accessible and safe for their users and compatible
with adjacent residences and commercial uses.
Policy 3.1 Ensure that all parks are adequately illuminated for safe use at night.
Policy 3.2 Provide for the supervision of park activities, and promote enforcement
of codes restricting illegal activity.
Policy 3.3 Continue coordination of park security between the Recreation and
Community Services Department and the Police Department to ensure
that they are adequately patrolled.
Policy 3.4 Restrict and control nighttime park use so that adjacent residences are not
adversely affected.
Goal 4.0 Ensure that the costs of park and recreation facilities and programs are
borne by those who benefit and contribute to additional demands.
Policy 4.1 Require that developers contribute to provide parks and recreational
facilities to offset additional demands brought about by new
development.
Policy 4.2 Pursue the utilization of various state and county funding mechanisms to
provide additional funding resources.
Policy 4.3 Establish a formal mechanism by which the City may accept gifts and
dedications of parks and open space.
Policy 4.4 Encourage the development of recreation programs by non -City public
and private sports organizations to involve more children and adults in
outdoor recreation activity. Use volunteers to operate and maintain
programs whenever possible.
Schools
Any impact on the provision of school services is mitigated through the payment of
development impact fees pursuant to the Leroy F. Green School Facilities Act. With
payment of required fees, impact will be less than significant.
Fire and Police Services
The following Safety Element policies are designed to ensure adequate provision of
public services in response to long -term growth. Property taxes and other special taxes
paid by future property owners will also support the incremental expansion of public
services as the population in the City grows. Impacts to public services will be less than
significant.
Goal 5.0 Provide a safe environment for the community of Baldwin Park.
Policy 5.1 Periodically evaluate levels of service to ensure Baldwin Park has
appropriate levels of police service.
Policy 5.2 Continue the City's aggressive program of Community Based Policing to
enhance public awareness and participation in crime prevention.
Policy 5.3 Continue to cooperate with the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Office,
along with other nearby police departments, to provide back -up police
assistance in emergency situations.
76 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Policy 5.4 Promote the use of defensible space concepts (e.g. site and building
lighting, visual observation of open spaces, secured areas) in project
design to enhance public safety.
Libraries
A Los Angeles County library is located on one of the underutilized residential
Opportunity Sites. Prior to any proposal to develop this site, consultation with County
Library system officials would be required to ensure that either the facility is no longer
needed due to system -wide enhancements or that at replacement facility is planned.
Such consultation will provide for any impacts to be addressed and mitigated at the
time a development proposal is put forward.
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 77
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
3.15 - RECREATION
a) Less Than Significant Impact. The City of Baldwin Park maintains six City -owned
parks totaling 27 acres. These include one community park and four neighborhood
parks. Residents also have access to approximately 169 acres of joint -use school
playground facilities. In addition to the City parks, residents have access to County
regional parks within and near the City. As sited in the Baldwin Park General Plan, the
National Recreation and Parks Association (NRPA) has established a minimum
guideline of 2.5 acres of public park service and facilities per 1,000 residents.41 With a
population of approximately 75,390 (2010 Census count), the City should have
approximately 189 acres of parks. Therefore, the City has an existing deficiency. As a
condition of approval for residential subdivisions, the City requires dedication of land
or payment of a fee in lieu or a combination of both. The purpose of the dedication
and /or fee is to provide parks and recreation facilities. Dedication and /or payment of
the fee helps to reduce potential impacts of future residential development on parks and
recreational facilities. Any future housing development will be required to pay
development impact fees; thus, deterioration to existing parks and recreation facilities
will be less than significant as a result of future housing development because parks and
recreation facilities will be incrementally expanded or new facilities built to meet future
demand. In addition, the following General Plan Open Space and Conservation policies
require the preservation of existing park space, encourage diverse recreational
programs, and require developers to contribute to parks and recreational facilities.
Goal 1.0 Provide and maintain adequate parks and open space.
Policy 1.1 Preserve all existing park space, and provide improvements to enhance
utilization.
41 City of Baldwin Park. General Plan. November 2002.
78 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Would the project increase the use of
existing neighborhood and regional
parks or other recreational facilities such
El
F-1
®
❑
that substantial physical deterioration of
the facility would occur or be
accelerated?
b) Does the project include recreational
facilities or require the construction or
expansion of recreational facilities that
El
F
might have an adverse physical effect on
the environment?
a) Less Than Significant Impact. The City of Baldwin Park maintains six City -owned
parks totaling 27 acres. These include one community park and four neighborhood
parks. Residents also have access to approximately 169 acres of joint -use school
playground facilities. In addition to the City parks, residents have access to County
regional parks within and near the City. As sited in the Baldwin Park General Plan, the
National Recreation and Parks Association (NRPA) has established a minimum
guideline of 2.5 acres of public park service and facilities per 1,000 residents.41 With a
population of approximately 75,390 (2010 Census count), the City should have
approximately 189 acres of parks. Therefore, the City has an existing deficiency. As a
condition of approval for residential subdivisions, the City requires dedication of land
or payment of a fee in lieu or a combination of both. The purpose of the dedication
and /or fee is to provide parks and recreation facilities. Dedication and /or payment of
the fee helps to reduce potential impacts of future residential development on parks and
recreational facilities. Any future housing development will be required to pay
development impact fees; thus, deterioration to existing parks and recreation facilities
will be less than significant as a result of future housing development because parks and
recreation facilities will be incrementally expanded or new facilities built to meet future
demand. In addition, the following General Plan Open Space and Conservation policies
require the preservation of existing park space, encourage diverse recreational
programs, and require developers to contribute to parks and recreational facilities.
Goal 1.0 Provide and maintain adequate parks and open space.
Policy 1.1 Preserve all existing park space, and provide improvements to enhance
utilization.
41 City of Baldwin Park. General Plan. November 2002.
78 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Policy 1.2 Establish as a priority for funding the acquisition and development of
parks and recreational facilities in neighborhoods where there are a
shortage of parks.
Policy 1.3 Pursue acquisition of property through purchase or donation to create
mini -parks where it is not possible to acquire sufficient acreage for
neighborhood parks.
Policy 1.4 Continue to work cooperatively with the Baldwin Park Unified School
District to maintain and expand playground use.
Goal 2.0 Provide a diversity of recreational programs to meet the needs of all
individuals and groups in Baldwin Park.
Policy 2.1 Conduct ongoing needs assessment and evaluation of demands for
recreational activities, and modify programs where necessary to meet
these demands.
Policy 2.2 Notify City residents of the types of recreation and programs available,
and encourage their participation.
Policy 2.3 Incorporate areas for both active and passive recreation in parks and
facilities, and ensure that these are accessible to all age groups, as
practical.
Goal 4.0 Ensure that the costs of park and recreation facilities and programs are
borne by those who benefit and contribute to additional demands.
Policy 4.1 Require that developers contribute to provide parks and recreational
facilities to offset additional demands brought about by new
development.
Policy 4.2 Pursue the utilization of various state and county funding mechanisms to
provide additional funding resources.
Policy 4.3 Establish a formal mechanism by which the City may accept gifts and
dedications of parks and open space.
Policy 4.4 Encourage the development of recreation programs by non -City public
and private sports organizations to involve more children and adults in
outdoor recreation activity. Use volunteers to operate and maintain
programs whenever possible.
b) Less Than Significant Impact. The updated Housing Element would not result in the
direct construction of any recreation facilities. Impacts related to the potential
construction of future recreation facilities will be less than significant.
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 79
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
3.16 - TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC
Would the project:
80 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant
Significant
Impact
Impact
with
Impact
Mitigation
Incorporation
a) Conflict with an applicable plan,
ordinance or policy establishing
measures of effectiveness for the
performance of the circulation system,
taking into account all modes of
transportation including mass transit
❑
❑
®
El
and non - motorized travel and relevant
components of the circulation system,
including but not limited to
intersections, streets, highways and
freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths,
and mass transit?
b) Conflict with an applicable congestion
management program, including, but
not limited to level of service standards
and travel demand measures, or other
El
El
standards established by the county
congestion management agency for
designated roads or highways?
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns,
including either an increase in traffic
❑
El
El
or a change in location that results
in substantial safety risks?
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a
design feature (e.g., sharp curves or
El
❑
❑
dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
e) Result in inadequate emergency access?
F
f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or
programs regarding public transit,
bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or
El
otherwise decrease the performance or
safety of such facilities?
80 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
a) Less than Significant Impact. Development of housing on the proposed Opportunity
Sites would result in approximately 133,419 daily vehicle trips at build -out based on the
Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) 8+h Edition Trip Generation manual. (This calculation
does not account for any discount on trips associated with existing uses on the non-
vacant Opportunity Sites.) An analysis of roadway level of service (LOS) was conducted
for General Plan build out (year 2020) conditions. Table 13 (Existing and General Plan
Build -out Roadway Daily Operating Conditions) summarizes the roadway segments in
the vicinity of the Opportunity Sites that are projected to operate at LOS F.
Table 13
Existing and General Plan Build -out Roadway Daily Operating Conditions
1995 daily volumes, obtained from the City, along with a growth rate of 1.2 percent were used to obtain existing
1998 daily volumes. (1 +0.012)3
A 1 percent per year growth rate was utilized in this study to obtain the ambient growth in the City of Baldwin
Park under buildout conditions (Year 2020). (1 +1.01)22
Note: ICU/LOS = Intersection Capacity Utilization /Level of Service
Source: City of Baldwin Park. General Plan EIR. 2002
As discussed in this Initial Study, the Housing Element does not propose any changes to
General. Plan land use policy. The General Plan estimates that 60 percent of the increase
in traffic over time is expected to be generated by new development; thus, the Housing
Element is within the scope of the analysis in the General Plan FIR. Issues associated
with ambient growth and traffic will be monitored by the City and mitigated on a
project -by- project basis. Traffic assessments will be required for future residential
development consistent with the City's standard environmental review process. Where
traffic studies are required, they will identify project - specific traffic generation, traffic
distribution, impacted intersections and roadways, project- specific fair -share
improvement fees, and applicable regional transportation fees. General Plan Circulation
Element policies maintain level of services standards and goals, as well as encourage
land use and circulation planning to support the use of alternative transportation.
Impacts related to substantial traffic congestion will be less than significant with
implementation of the following General Plan policies.
Policy 1.1 Develop and maintain the local circulation system illustrated in General
Plan Figure C -1.
Policy 1.2 Require significant new land use developments to prepare traffic studies
using intersection analyses to detail potential traffic impacts.
City of Baldwin Park Housing EIement Initial Study 81
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Policy 1.3 Where project -level traffic studies support the need for added street
segment capacity, pursue alternatives to avoid widenings including land
restriping, peak hour parking restrictions, and /or similar less intensive
and costly measures.
Policy 1.4 Maintain as a goal the provision of service levels at intersections along
arterial highways at Level of Service "D" or better during morning and
evening peak travel periods.
Policy 1.5 Adopt five -year Capital Improvement Programs that identify street and
related improvements required to ensure smooth traffic flow.
Policy 1.6 Continue to automate traffic signals and to develop an integrated traffic
signal control system.
Policy 1.7 Monitor growth within the City and its impacts on the City street system,
and make improvements as needed consistent with five -year capital
improvement plans.
Policy 1.8 Develop a modified standard for local residential streets that allows
narrower streets to be designed and constructed within areas designated
as pedestrian districts and for residential subdivisions.
Goal 3.0 Encourage increased use of public transportation.
Policy 3.1 Work with the MTA to establish bus stops at appropriate locations
throughout the City to adequately serve retail, employment, rail and
other public gathering areas.
Policy 3.2 Provide lighted, sheltered bus stops to encourage transit use.
Policy 3.3 Continue to support the City Transit system which serves to provide a
viable alternative to the automobile and to reduce traffic trips.
Policy 3.4 Project convenient access to and adequate parking for the City's
Metrolink station to increase utilization of the Metrolink system by both
commuters and visitors to the Baldwin Park area.
Goal 4.0 Accommodate alternative modes of transportation in land use and
circulation planning.
Policy 4.1 Provide for a Citywide bicycle path system consistent with General Plan
Figure C -4 that can be implemented in a safe and efficient manner.
Policy 4.2 Continue funding City programs which provide for sidewalk
construction in residential neighborhoods where sidewalks do not exist
and are desired by local residents.
b) Less than Significant Impact. The Congestion Management Program (CMP) is
administered by the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
(Metro). The CMP establishes a service goal of LOS E or better on all CMP roadway
segment. CMP intersections within Baldwin Park include I -10 and I -605. Any future
housing development would be required to have prepared a traffic impact analysis if it
causes a substantial change to the level of service. For purposes of the CMP, substantial
changes for freeway segments are defined as an increase or decrease of 0.10 in demand
82 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
to capacity (D /C) ratio and a corresponding change in LOS.42 As identified in Section
4.15.b above, the proposed Housing Element would result in 133,419 trips at build -out.
The City will determine if a traffic impact analysis is required as part of the City's
standard project review process and determine potential future impacts to CMP
facilities. Impacts related to level of service standards on CMP facilities will be less than
significant.
c) No Impact. The updated Housing Element is focused on achieving local housing
objectives and does not authorize any construction that would result in the need to
redirect or otherwise alter air traffic patterns. Furthermore, the proposed Housing
Element will not result in substantial population growth that could significantly increase
air traffic. Therefore, the project will have no air traffic impacts.
d) No Impact. The project does not involve the construction of any roadway and would
have no effect on the City's street and site design standards.
e) Less than Significant Impact. The project does not involve any road construction or
any development activity and thus will not obstruct or restrict emergency access to or
through the City. Future housing development facilitated by implementation of
Housing Element policies will be subject to site plan review. In conjunction with the
review and approval of building permits, the County Fire Department reviews all plans
to ensure compliance with all applicable emergency access and safety requirements.
With continued application of project review procedures, impacts involving emergency
access will be less than significant.
f) No Impact. The proposed Housing Element policies and programs would not conflict
with or have an effect on any local or regional policies involving support of alternative
transportation. The Housing Element does not conflict with General Plan transportation
policies that support public transit and will not interfere with the current or future goals
involving the local bus systems or Metrolink transit options. The project will have no
impact on alternative transportation plans.43
42 Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transit Authority. 2010 Congestion Management Program. 2010.
43 City of Baldwin Park. General Plan. September 2002.
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 83
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
3.17 - UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Would the project:
a) No Impact. Wastewater treatment services for Baldwin Park are provided by Los
Angeles County Sanitation District (LACSD). Wastewater treatment requirements for
the Los Angeles County Sanitation District treatment facilities are established by the Los
Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB).44 These treatment
requirements establish pollutant limits for effluent discharges to receiving waters.
44 Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board. LARWQCB Basin Plan. June 1994.
84 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant
Significant
Impact
Impact
with
Impact
Mitigation
Incorporation
a) Exceed wastewater treatment
requirements of the applicable Regional
Water Quality Control Board?
b) Require or result in the construction of
new water or wastewater treatment
facilities or expansion of existing
❑
®
❑
facilities, the construction of which could
cause significant environmental effects?
c) Require or result in the construction of
new storm water drainage facilities or
expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects?
d) Have sufficient water supplies available
to serve the project from existing
F-1
F-1
entitlements and resources, or are new
or expanded entitlements needed?
e) Result in a determination by the
wastewater treatment provider which
serves or may serve the project that it
F-1
F-1
®
❑
has adequate capacity to serve the
project's projected demand in addition
to the provider's existing commitments?
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient
permitted capacity to accommodate the
❑
®
0
project's solid waste disposal needs?
g) Comply with federal, state, and local
statutes and regulations related to solid
El
waste?
a) No Impact. Wastewater treatment services for Baldwin Park are provided by Los
Angeles County Sanitation District (LACSD). Wastewater treatment requirements for
the Los Angeles County Sanitation District treatment facilities are established by the Los
Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB).44 These treatment
requirements establish pollutant limits for effluent discharges to receiving waters.
44 Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board. LARWQCB Basin Plan. June 1994.
84 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Future housing development will result in typical residential wastewater discharges,
and will not require new methods or equipment for treatment that are not currently
permitted for the existing treatment plants. Furthermore, residential development is not
subject to point- source discharge requirements. The project will not impact compliance
with RWQCB treatment requirements. Future housing development will not interfere
with compliance with RWQCB wastewater treatment requirements; thus, no impact will
occur.
b) Less than Significant Impact. Future housing development will incrementally increase
water demand and wastewater discharges. Wastewater is treated at the San Jose Creek
Water Reclamation Plan near the City of Whittier, where it is treated and reused as
groundwater recharge and irrigation of parks, schools, and greenbelts. LACSD indicates
that presently no deficiencies or significant treatment capacity limitations exist within
their facilities. According to LACSD, the district has adequate capacity to accommodate
development associated with implementation of the proposed project.45
The Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, Sewer Maintenance Division, and
the Baldwin Park Engineering Division consider the sewer line system adequate to
handle foreseeable future development. The City will identify the need for expansion of
water and wastewater facilities, such as water and sewer mains, as needed, on a project -
by- project basis during its standard environmental review process. Any environmental
impacts related to the construction or expansion of water or wastewater facilities will be
analyzed and mitigated for at the time of development. The City has adopted policies in
the General Plan to reduce potential growth- related impacts associated with future
development. With adherence to the policies identified in the General Plan Open Space
and Conservation Element, impacts related to the expansion of water and wastewater
facilities will be less than significant.
Policy 1.1 Work closely with local water and sewer districts in determining and
meeting community needs for water and sewer service.
Policy 1.2 Permit development densities and intensities no higher than the City's
ability to provide the necessary public services, utilities, street capacities,
and recreational opportunities required for the areas affected by
development.
c) Less than Significant Impact. The updated Housing Element is focused on achieving
local housing objectives and does not authorize any construction that would result in the
construction of new storm water drainage facilities or the expansion of existing facilities.
Drainage improvements are constructed on a project -by- project basis. This typically
involves routing a major drainage course through a project by concentrating the flow
into an acceptable drainage facility. Construction of drainage devices will be subject to
standard construction requirements for erosion control and water quality requirements.
Future housing development will comply with existing standards and regulations for
conveyance of storm water; thus, impacts to the environment from construction of storm
drain infrastructure will be less than significant.
45 City of Baldwin Park. General Plan Environmental Impact Report. September 2002.
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 85
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
d) Less than Significant Impact. Potable water in Baldwin Park is provided by three water
companies: Valley County Water District (VCWD), San Gabriel Valley Water Company,
and Valley View Mutual Water Company (VVMWD). VCWD is the largest water
supplier and serves approximately 55,000 people. VCWD has the capacity to produce 15
million gallons of water per day (mgd). However, the average production is 7 to 8 mgd.
Water supplied by VCWD is from wells at a depth of approximately 600 feet in the
Upper San Gabriel Groundwater Basin. The increase in population resulting from
implementation of Housing Element policy is expected to result in incremental increased
demand for services. Water consumption has been estimated according to usage data
provided by VCWD. Implementation of the proposed Housing Element will result in an
overall increase of 486,740 gallons per day (gpd) in water usage at buildout (409 gpd at
30 single family units + 133 gpd at 990 multi- family units + 0.12 gpd at 2,856,664.8
square feet commercial). This is well within the capacity of VCWD, which has a current
maximum capacity of 15 mgd and an average production of 7 to 8 mgd. The proposed
Housing Element would not result in any population growth or additional demand on
water supplies; rather, the Element will guide development to accommodate anticipated
growth in the community through the year 2021. Therefore, the proposed Housing
Element would not result in the need for new or expanded water supplies, and impact
will be less than significant.46
e) Less Than Significant Impact. Wastewater treatment requirements are established by
the Los Angeles RWQCB. Housing development has no special wastewater treatment
requirements. Impact will be less than significant.
f) Less Than Significant Impact. The Puente Hills Landfill (PHLF) in Whittier, operated
by the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, is the primary destination for
solid waste collected in Baldwin Park. The current capacity for the landfill is
approximately 12,000 tons per day of solid waste. Although PHLF is expected to end
operations on October 31, 2013, other landfills are available to serve the City. The
Chiquita Canyon Sanitary Landfill, located in Castaic, has a permitted daily capacity of
6,000 tons per day and a total capacity of 63,900,00 cubic yards, with a remaining
capacity of 29,300,000 cubic yards. The Chiquita Canyon Landfill is estimated to close in
2019. Regional plans are underway to transport waste by rail to landfill sites in the
desert areas to the east. Compliance with City General Plan Open Space and
Conservation policies and County waste reduction programs and policies would reduce
the volume of solid waste entering landfills. Individual development projects within the
City would be required to comply with applicable State and local regulations, thus
reducing the amount of landfill waste by at least 50 percent. Future housing would
increase the volume of solid waste generated in the City that is diverted to existing
landfills, thus contributing to the acceleration of landfill closures or the use of more
distant sites. Impacts related to sufficient landfill capacity are anticipated to be less than
significant.
Goal 7.0 Reduce the amount of solid waste produced in Baldwin Park.
46 City of Baldwin Park. General Plan Environmental Impact Report. September 2002.
86 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Policy 7.1 Implement goals and policies contained in the City's Household
Hazardous Waste and Source Reduction and Recycling Elements as
mandated by AB939, as amended.
Policy 7.2 Maximize public awareness of all source reduction and recycling
programs.
Policy 7.3 Encourage composting of organic materials and recycling in general as an
alternative to waste disposal.
Policy 7.4 Encourage participation in local and County waste disposal programs for
such household hazardous waste items as automotive products, paints,
chemicals, tires, and batteries.
g) No Impact. Residential waste collection in Baldwin Park is disposed of in regional
landfills, as described above. All new residential development will be required to
comply with State mandates and City regulations regarding reduction/ recycling of
household waste. None of the proposed housing strategies inherent in the proposed
Housing Element would have any effect upon or result in any conflicts with solid waste
disposal regulations. No impact will occur.
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 87
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
3.18 - MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a) Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The results of the
preceding analysis indicate that the proposed project would have no effect upon
sensitive biological, historical, or paleontological resources, and would not result in
significant impacts to archaeological resources with mitigation incorporated. There will
be no impact to scenic vistas and less than significant impacts to visual character and
resources. Because the project would not authorize any plan to develop new homes or
to redevelop existing housing and would not change existing City land use policy
regarding locations or intensities of residential development, it would not result in any
effects that would degrade the quality of the environment. The City hereby finds that
impacts related to degradation of the environment will be less than significant, that no
impacts to biological resources will occur, and that impacts to cultural resources will be
less than significant with application of Mitigation Measure C -1.
b) Less than Significant Impact. Cumulative effects resulting from full implementation of
the City's residential land use policies were evaluated in the General Plan EIR. The
88 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant
Significant
Impact
Impact
with
Impact
Mitigation
Incorporation
a) Does the project have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish
or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self -
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a
❑
®
❑
❑
plant or animal comrnunity, reduce the
number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods
of California history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable?
('Cumulatively considerable" means that
the incremental effects of a project are
❑
❑
N
❑
considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the
effects of other current projects, and the
effects of probable future projects)?
c) Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial
El
❑
®
E]
adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly?
a) Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The results of the
preceding analysis indicate that the proposed project would have no effect upon
sensitive biological, historical, or paleontological resources, and would not result in
significant impacts to archaeological resources with mitigation incorporated. There will
be no impact to scenic vistas and less than significant impacts to visual character and
resources. Because the project would not authorize any plan to develop new homes or
to redevelop existing housing and would not change existing City land use policy
regarding locations or intensities of residential development, it would not result in any
effects that would degrade the quality of the environment. The City hereby finds that
impacts related to degradation of the environment will be less than significant, that no
impacts to biological resources will occur, and that impacts to cultural resources will be
less than significant with application of Mitigation Measure C -1.
b) Less than Significant Impact. Cumulative effects resulting from full implementation of
the City's residential land use policies were evaluated in the General Plan EIR. The
88 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
proposed Housing Element update would not change any of these policies and does not
propose any specific development or redevelopment project that could contribute to
short -term or long -term cumulative impacts that were not addressed sufficiently in the
General Plan EIR. The Housing Element does not have any changes to land use
designations and thus is consistent with the project analyzed in the General Plan EIR.
The City thereby finds that the contribution of the proposed project to cumulative
impacts will be less than significant.
c) Less than Significant Impact. As supported by the preceding environmental
evaluation, the project would not result in substantial adverse effects on human beings.
Under each environmental consideration addressed in the preceding analysis, the
proposed project is considered to have little or no adverse impacts on people and the
environment. Based on the analysis in this Initial Study, the City finds that direct and
indirect impacts to human beings will be less than significant.
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 89
Section 5: References
• IN
4.1 - LIST OF PREPARERS
City of Baldwin Park
Community Development Department
Planning Division
14403 East Pacific Avenue
Baldwin Park, CA 91706
626 - 960 -4011
Amy Harbin, City Planner
MIG I Hogle- Ireland
169 N. Marengo Avenue 1500 Iowa Avenue #110
Pasadena, CA 91101 Riverside, CA 92507
626 -744 -9872 951 -787 -9222
Initial Study
Laura Stetson, AICP, Principal
Christopher Brown, Director of Environmental Services
Olivia Young, Project Assistant
Heidi Mellor, Project Associate (Graphics)
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 90
Section 6: Summary of Mitigation Measures
Section 5: SUMMARY OF MITIGATION
Cultural Resources
C -1 During excavation and grading activities of any future development project, if
archaeological resources are discovered the project contractor shall stop all work and
shall retain a qualified archaeologist to evaluate the significance of the finding and
appropriate course of action. Salvage operation requirements pursuant to Section
15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines shall be followed and the treatment of discovered
Native American remains shall comply with State codes and regulations of the Native
American Heritage Commission. Emphasis shall be placed on avoidance of the
discovered resource, where feasible, prior to consideration of other treatment methods.
City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study 91
Section 6: Summary of Mitigation Measures
92 City of Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study
r A : ,
Al
D o r
April 25, 2013
Mr. Marc Castagnola, Director
Community Development Department
City of Baldwin Park
14403 Pacific Avenue
Baldwin Park, CA 91706
Dear Mr. Castagnola:
Thank you for submitting the City of Baldwin Park's draft housing element update received
for review on March 5, 2013, along with revisions received on April 18 and 19, 2013.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 65585(b), the Department is reporting the results of
its review. The Department conducted a streamlined review of the draft housing element
based on the City meeting eligibility criteria detailed in the Department's Housing Element
Update Guidance. A telephone conversation on April 10, 2013 and various other
communications with Ms. Laura Stetson, the City's consultant, facilitated the review.
The revised draft element meets the statutory requirements of State housing element law.
The element will comply with State housing element law (Article 10.6 of the Government
Code) when the element is adopted and submitted to the Department, pursuant to
Government Code Section 65585(8).
To remain on an eight year planning cycle, pursuant to Senate Bill 375 (Chapter 728,
Statutes of 2008) the City must adopt its housing element within 120 calendar days from
the statutory due date of October 15, 2013 for Southern California Association of
Government localities. If adopted after this date, the City will be required to revise the
housing element every four years until adopting at least two consecutive revisions by the
statutory deadline (Government Code Section 65588(e)(4)). For more information on
housing element adoption requirements, please visit our website at:
http://www.hcd.ca.gov/hpd/hrc/plan/he/he review adoptionstepsl 10812,pd .
Public participation in the development, adoption and implementation of the housing
element is essential to effective housing planning. Throughout the housing element
process, the City should continue to engage the community, including organizations that
represent lower-income and special needs households, by making information regularly
available and considering and incorporating comments where appropriate.
Mr. Marc Castagnola, Director
Page 2
housing The Department appreciates the hard work and dedication of Ms, Stetson in preparation of
the element • # looks forward to receiving Baldwin Park's adopted housing
element. If you have any # or .. # additional
Brett Arriaga, of our staff, at (916) 445-5888.
A A
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
320 WEST 4TH STREET, SUITE 500
LOS ANGELES, CA 90013
(213) 576 -7083
June 13, 2013
Amy Harbin
City of Baldwin Park
14403 East Pacific Avenue
Baldwin Park, CA 91706
Dear Ms. Harbin:
Re: SCH 2013061010 Baldwin Park 2014 -2021 Housing Element MND
EDMUND G. BROWN JR.. Governor
c �
The California Public Utilities Commission (Commission) has jurisdiction over the safety of highway -
rail crossings (crossings) in California. The California Public Utilities Code requires Commission
approval for the construction or alteration of crossings and grants the Commission exclusive power
on the design, alteration, and closure of crossings in California. The Commission Rail Crossings
Engineering Section (RCES) is in receipt of the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration (DMND) for the
proposed City of Baldwin Park (City) 2 -14 -2021 Housing Element Project.
The project site area includes multiple active railroad tracks. RCES recommends that the City add
language to the Housing Element project so that any future development adjacent to or near the
railroad /light rail right -of -way (ROW) is planned with the safety of the rail corridor in mind. New
developments may increase traffic volumes not only on streets and at intersections, but also at at-
grade crossings. This includes considering pedestrian circulation patterns or destinations with
respect to railroad ROW and compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Mitigation
measures to consider include, but are not limited to, the planning for grade separations for major
thoroughfares, improvements to existing at -grade crossings due to increase in traffic volumes and
continuous vandal resistant fencing or other appropriate barriers to limit the access of trespassers
onto the railroad ROW.
If you have any questions in this matter, please contact me at (213) 576 -7076, ykcgcpuc.ca.gov.
Sincerely,
C: State Clearinghouse
STATE OF CkLIFORNIA
Edmund G own it Governor
NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION
1560 Harbor Boulevard, Suite 100
I q
ra
West Sacramento, CA 95691
O_
W
(9 16) 3733715
Fax (916) 373-5471
Web Site www.nahc.cax jov
Dsnahc6paoball.net
STATED F N1
NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION
1550 Harbor Boulevard
West Sacramento, CA 95691
(916) 373-3715
(916) 373-5471 — FAX
e-mail: ds—nahc@pacbell.net JUN 1 7 2
June 14, 2013
Ms. Amy Harbin, City Planner C-3
City of Baldwin Park Planning Division
%
14403 East Pacific Avenue
Baldwin park, CA 91706
RE: SCH# 2013061010 CEQA Notice of Completion; proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration for the City of Baldwin Park 2014-2021 Housing Element General Plan
Update; located in the City of Baldwin Park County, California.
Dear Ms. Harbin:
Government Code Section 65352.3 requires local governments to consult with
California Native American tribes identified by the Native American Heritage
Commission (NAHC) for the purpose of protecting and/or mitigating impacts to cultural
places. The Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) is the state 'agency with
responsibilities for Native American cultural resources.
In the 1985 Appellate Court decision (170 Call App Td 604), the court held that the
NAHC has jurisdiction and special expertise, as a state agency, over affected Native
American resources impacted by proposed projects, including archaeological places of
religious significance to Native Americans, and to Native American burial sites. Note
that the NAHC does NOT APPROVE General or Specific Plan; rather, it provides a list
of tribal governments with which local jurisdictions must consult concerning any
proposed impact to cultural resources as a result of the proposed action.
An NAHC Sacred Lands File search was conducted and failed to indicate the
presence of Native American traditional cultural place(s) in the immediate project area
of potential effect (APE). Also, the absence of specific site information in the Sacred
lands file does not preclude their.existence. Other sources of cultural resources should
also be contacted for information regarding known and recorded sites.
Attached is a consultation list of tribal governments with traditional lands or cultural
places located in the vicinity of the Project Area (APE). The tribal entities on the list are
for your guidance for government-to-government consultation purposes.
A Native American tribe or individual may be the only source of the presence of
traditional cultural places. For that reason, a list of Native American Contacts is
enclosed as they may have knowledge of cultural resources and about potential
impact, if any, of the proposed project.
If you have any questions, please let me know.
4=11
0 aVe S i n'g I ef o--n b
Program Analyst
Attachment
California Tribal Government Consultation List
Los Angeles County
-1 A,
june 1t
Gabrieleno/Tonciva San Gabriel Band of Mission
Anthony Morales, Chairperson
PO Box 693 Gabrielino Tongva
San Gabriel CA 91778
GTTribalcouncilPaot.com
(626) 286-1632
(626) 286-1758 - Home
(626) 483--3564 cell
Gabrielino Tongva Nation
Sam Dunlap, Cultural Resources Director
P.O. Box 86908 Gabrielino Tongva
Los Angeles CA 90086
samdunlap(?Pearthlink. net
(909) 262-9351 - cell
Gabrielino-Tongva Tribe
Linda Candelaria, Co-Chairperson
P.O. Box 180
Bonsall CA 92003
palmsprings9@?yahoo.corn Gabrielino
626-676-1184- cell
(760) 636-0854 - FAX
Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians
Andrew Salas, Chairperson
P.O. Box 393
Covina CA 91723
gabrielenoindians @ yahoo.com Gabrielino
(626) 926-4131
This list is current only as of the date of this document
Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Health and
Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resources Code and Seaton 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code.
This list is applicable only for consultation with Native American tribes under Government Code Section 65352.3. and 653624.
at seq.
COUNTY SAKI TATION DISC - CT
1955 'VVorl <man 1,A,11; Rcod, WIii`t=er, CA 90601 - i 4,00
me,ilinq Address: RC . Box 4998, V�iiittier, CA 90607 -4998
fel�t�noF �562j 699 -7411, FAX: <;562j 699 -5422
Ms. Amy Harbin, City Planner
Planning Division
City of Baldwin Park
14403 East Pacific Avenue
Baldwin Park, CA 91706
Dear Ms. Harbin:
July 1, 2013
Ref. File No.: 2622
City of Baldwin Park 2014 -2021 Housing Element
JUL 02 20 ij'
u. � �f R N,
d [
The County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County (Districts) received a Notice of Intent to
Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the subject project on June 11, 2011 The City of Baldwin
Park (City) is located within the jurisdictional boundaries of Districts Nos. 15 and 22. We offer the
following comments regarding sewerage service:
The Districts oven, operate, and maintain only the large trunk sewers that form the backbone of the
regional wastewater conveyance system. Local collector and/or lateral sewer lines are the
responsibility of the jurisdiction in which they are located. As such, the Districts cannot comment
on any deficiencies in the sewerage system in the City except to state that presently no deficiencies
exist in Districts' facilities that serve the City. For information on deficiencies in the City sewerage
system, please contact the City Department of Public Works and /or the Los Angeles County
Department of Public Works.
2. The wastewater generated within the City is treated at one or more of the following: the San Jose
Creek Water Reclamation Plant (VV'RP) Iocated adjacent to the City of Industry, which has a design
capacity of 100 million gallons per day (mgd) and currently processes an average flow of 76.6 mgd;
the Whittier Narrows WRP located near the City of South El Monte, which has a design capacity
of 15 mgd and currently processes an average flow of 8.0 mgd; and /or the Los Coyotes WRP
located in the City of Cerritos, which has a design capacity of 37.5 mgd and currently processes
an average flow of 22.0 mgd.
3. The Districts would appreciate the opportunity to review individual developments within the City
in order to determine whether or not sufficient trunk sewer capacity exists to serve each project
and if Districts' facilities will be affected by the project.
4. Based on the Districts' average wastewater generation factors, an additional 557 residential units
would.increase average wastewater flow from the City by approximately 115;570 gallons per day.
For a copy of the Districts' average wastewater generation factors, go to www.lacsd.org,
DOC it 2647937,D15 &22
4
Ms. Amy Harbin -2- July 1, 2013
Wastewater & Sewer Systems, Will Serve Program, and click on the Table I CLoadings for Each.
Class of Land Use link.
The Districts are empowered by the California Health and Safety Code to charge a fee for the
privilege of connecting (directly or indirectly) to the Districts' Sewerage System or increasing the
strength or quantity of wastewater attributable to a particular parcel or operation already
connected. This connection fee is a capital facilities fee that is imposed in an amount sufficient to
construct an incremental expansion of the Sewerage System to accommodate the proposed
project. Payment of a connection fee will be required before a permit to connect to the sewer is
issued. For a copy of the Connection Fee Information Sheet, go to www.14csd.org, Wastewater &
Sewer Systems, Will Serve Program, and click on the appropriate link. For more specific
information regarding the connection fee application procedure and fees, please contact the
Connection Fee Counter at extension 2727.
In order for the Districts to conform to the requirements of the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA), the
design capacities of the Districts' wastewater treatment facilities are based on the regional growth
forecast adopted by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). Specific
policies included in the development of the SLAG regional growth forecast are incorporated into
clean air plans, which are prepared by the South Coast and Antelope Valley Air Quality
Management Districts in order to improve air quality in the South Coast and Mojave Desert Air
Basins as mandated by the CCA. All expansions of Districts' facilities must be sized and service
phased in a manner that will be consistent with the SLAG regional growth forecast for the
counties of Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino, Riverside, Ventura, and Imperial. The
available capacity of the Districts' treatment facilities will, therefore, be limited to levels
associated with the approved growth identified by SCAG. As such, this letter does not constitute
a guarantee of wastewater service, but is to advise you that the Districts intend to provide this
service up to the levels that are legally permitted and to inform you of the currently existing
capacity and any proposed expansion of the Districts' facilities.
If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at (562) 908-4288, extension 2717.
Very truly yours,
Grace Robinson Chan
C� 4A�f"
Adriana Raza
Customer Service Specialist
Facilities Planning Department
AR:ar
DOC # 2647937.DI5822
� � a
IN
RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -034
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BALDWIN PARK ADOPTING THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND
APPROVING AN UPDATE TO THE HOUSING ELEMENT OF
THE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE 2014 -2021 PLANNING
PERIOD (APPLICANT: CITY OF BALDWIN PARK; CASE
NO. AGP -116).
WHEREAS, pursuant to the applicable provisions of the planning and land
use law (California Government Code Section 65300 et. seq.), studies were commenced
for the purpose of considering the City's need for amending the Housing Element of the
General Plan; and
WHEREAS, a draft Housing Element, attached as Exhibit `A' and which has
been incorporated by reference, has been prepared for the planning period 2014 -2021 and
submitted to the City Council for review and approval; and
WHEREAS, the draft Housing Element consists of an extensive analysis with
supporting appendix, and comprehensively addresses the statutory requirements of
Government Code Section 65583 relating to housing element requirements; and
WHEREAS, City staff has been in consultation with the State of California
Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) regarding compliance with
Government Code Section 65583, including City consideration of HCD guidelines; and
WHEREAS, the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG)
adopted and released a Final Report on its Regional Housing Needs Assessment
establishing regional fair share housing allocations for each City in Los Angeles County;
and
WHEREAS, the City submitted drafts of the City's proposed Housing Element
to HCD for comment and revision; and
WHEREAS, HCD suggested revisions to the draft Housing Element that have
been incorporated into the draft Housing Element as submitted to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, HCD has made findings pursuant to Government Code Section
65585(b) stating the draft Housing Element as attached hereto is in substantial compliance
with housing element statutory requirements; and
WHEREAS, the draft Housing Element has been subject to environmental
review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and
AGP -116
October 2, 2013
Page 2 of 4
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a noticed public hearing on
August 28, 2013, after which the Planning Commission recommended the City Council
adopt the Negative Declaration and proposed Housing Element; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has conducted a noticed public hearing on October
2, 2013 to receive comments and consider the proposed amendment to the Housing
Element, Case No. AGP -116 on file with the Planning Division of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN
PARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council relied upon the evidence presented at the
public hearing in making the determinations set forth in this Resolution and in reaching the
conclusions set forth in Sections 2 and 3.
SECTION 2. The City Council at the time of the public hearing on the above
matter reviewed and considered the proposed Initial Study and Mitigated Negative
Declaration of Environmental Impact, relating to the Housing Element Amendment (SCH
#2013061010) and based on that review finds and determines the following:.
a) The public review period for the Mitigated Negative Declaration
began on June 5, 2013 and ended on July 5, 2013; and
b) No comments were received from the State Clearinghouse on the
proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration; and
c) The City received comment letters from the following entities: (1)
California Public Utilities Commission; (2) Native American Heritage
Commission; and (3) Los Angeles County Sanitation District; and
d) There is no substantial evidence the proposed project (Housing
Element Update) will have a significant effect on the environment; and
e) Based upon its public review, the City Council has determined
there is no substantial evidence the amendment will have a significant impact
on the environment; and.
f) Based on the foregoing, adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration
of Environmental Impact.
SECTION 3. The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby find,
determine and declare as follows:
a) The City Council has conducted a noticed public hearing on the
proposed amendment to the Housing Element, Case No. AGP -116 on file
AGP -116
October 2, 2013
Paqe 3 of 4
with the Planning Division of the City, and an environmental analysis, as
hereinabove described; and
b) The proposed Housing Element Update is consistent with the
goals, policies, and objectives of the current General Plan in that it
encourages a balanced approach to meeting housing needs that include
both owners and renters and emphasizes maintaining and enhancing the
quality of existing housing and residential neighborhoods in the City. Further,
the Housing Element Update is internally consistent with other land use goals
and policies of the General Plan; and
c) The proposed Housing Element Update will not adversely affect
surrounding properties, because it includes goals and policies to encourage
improvement and enhancement to existing residential neighborhoods
throughout the City. In addition, any future proposed housing developments
are required to comply with all City development standards and applicable
design guidelines; and
d) The Housing Element Update maintains specific goals and policies
that are aimed at maintaining and improving Baldwin Park's established
neighborhoods which promote the public health, safety and general welfare
of the community. This includes encouraging the City's participation in
programs that provide home ownership opportunities for families, facilitating
the development of housing for all income levels for the 2014 -2021 planning
period, and programs (Community Improvement Program and Home
Improvement Residential Program) to improve and enhance existing
residential neighborhoods, and ; and
e) The proposed amendment will not conflict with the provision of the
City's Zoning Code, subdivision regulations or any applicable specific plan.
The proposed Housing Element Update contains goals, policies,
implementation programs related to the development and rehabilitation of
housing throughout the City and serves the goals and purposes of the
Zoning Ordinance, subdivision regulations and existing specific plans. The
proposed Housing Element Update does not conflict with the City's Zoning
Code or State Housing Law.
SECTION 4. Based on all the foregoing, the City Council hereby approves
and adopts the Housing Element Update, Case No. AGP -116, to delete the existing
Housing Element and replace the same in its entirely with the attached Housing Element of
the General Plan for the 2014 -2021 Planning Period.
SECTION 5. Except as expressly amended herein including Exhibit A or as
the context otherwise requires, all the terms and provisions of the existing General Plan
shall remain in full force and effect.
AGP -116
October 2, 2013
Panes 4 of 4
SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of the Resolution and
shall forward a copy hereof to the Secretary of the Planning Commission. The Planning
Division shall file the Notice of Determination and the Fish and Game Paperwork with the
Los Angeles County Clerk.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON the 2nd day of October, 2013.
MANUEL LOZANO, MAYOR
ATTEST:
ALEJANDRA AVILA, CITY CLERK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES)SS.
CITY OF BALDWIN PARK )
1, ALEJANDRA AVILA, City Clerk of the Baldwin Park City Council do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution No. 2013 -034 was duly and regularly approved and adopted by
the City Council at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 2nd day of October, 2013 by the
following vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
im
WMAYM-1 •
pi�pi iiiiij l�llill 11111111 111 �ippi� �1117011�� i'r
7a I TR Us-
This report requests the City Council consider the following:
(1) Amendment to the City's Municipal Code (AZC-174) adding Section
153.170.107 relating to the creation of a Comprehensive Sign
Program; and
(2) Initial Study and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for
AZC- 174.
'I I � I �! I I �, 1 � � 1 1 � I _ I �, � � ��
�s � I, 1 11 Ill ;!'! 1 111 � , �i,� � � • � � I � I I I � I 1 11 Pi[10 t.
In accordance with the provisions of the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA), it
has been determined that the proposed project will not have a significant impact on the
environment and a Draft Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact has been
prepared by the Planning Division. A Notice of Intent inviting public comment on the
Initial Study/Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact was posted at City Hall,
Barnes Park and the Esther Snyder Community Center on Thursday, August 1, 2013
and concluded Wednesday, August 21, 2013.
At the conclusion of the public review period, no comments were received on the Initial
Study. Subsequently, the Planning Commission considered the Negative Declaration of
Environmental Impact and recommended the City Council approve the same.
A Notice of Public Hearing for the proposed code amendment was posted at City Hall,
Baldwin Park Community Center, and Barnes Park on Thursday, September 12, 2013.
Ordinance 1359
October 2, 2013
Paae 2
In May 2012, the City adopted a comprehensive zoning code amendment established
to regulate the use of land within the city. As part of the zoning code update new
provisions were established that regulate sign or advertising displays that are erected or
maintained within the city. New development standards were set for non-exempt signs
as defined in the City's Code. Depending on the zoning designation and sign type there
are certain limitations on the number of signs, sign face area and height.
However, certain development standards within the City's Sign Regulation section of
the Municipal Code, when applied to certain properties, present a hardship to some
property owners. Typically, large scale retail developments as well as irregularly large
commercial developments seem to face said hardship. For example, current
development standards do not accommodate adequate signage for larger big box
development and do not provide adequate signage scale given the size of a big box
building. In some cases, larger scale developments are faced with a dilemma in which
signage is not sufficient.
Earlier this year, Kaiser Permanente submitted an application to amend the City's
Municipal Code to allow more than the maximum allowable number of
freestanding/monument signs, to allow more than the maximum allowable sign face
area and height for on-site directional signage, and to allow more than the allowable
sign face area for a directory sign when the appropriate criteria is present at the subject
site.
The purpose of a comprehensive sign program is to enhance the overall development
of the City with signage which is in harmony with, and relates visually to other signs
included in the comprehensive sign program, and relates to the structures or
developments they identify.
The proposed ordinance (Attachment #3) will apply to non-exempt signs, as defined in
Section 153.170.040 (C) of the City's Municipal Code, within the Mixed Use,
Commercial, and Industrial Zones. The proposed ordinance will add a new section to
the City's sign regulations which will allow for the creation of a comprehensive sign
program in order to provide a means for the flexible application of the City's sign
regulations, allowing for latitude in the design and display of multiple signs, while not
circumventing the overall sign regulations contained in Subchapter 153.170.
In general, a comprehensive sign program may modify the development standards
relating to sign number, size, height, illumination, location, or orientation. Staff is
proposing that a sign program be available when the following circumstances exist:
1. Whenever the floor area is in excess of 25,000 square feet;
CAAmyWMYMORD\Reports\Council Reports\AZC-174 #3.DOC
Ordinance 1359
October 2, 2013
Paqe 3
2. Whenever five or more separate commercial or industrial tenant spaces
are present on the same site;
3. Whenever the City Planner determines that a comprehensive sign
program is needed because of special project characteristics (e.g., the
size of proposed signs, limited site visibility, the location of the site
relative to other lots, buildings, or streets, etc.).
A proposed sign program must comply with these minimum standards:
1 The proposed sign program shall comply with the purpose and intent of
this chapter;
2. The proposed signs shall enhance the overall development, be in
harmony with, and relate visually to other signs included in the
comprehensive sign program, to the structures and/or developments they
identify, and to surrounding development when applicable-,
3. The sign program shall address all signs, including permanent,
temporary, and exempt signs;
4. The sign program shall accommodate future revisions that may be
required because of changes in use or commercial tenants;
5. The sign program shall comply with the standards of Subchapter
153.170_, except that deviations are allowed with regard to sign area,
total number, location, and/or height of signs to the extent that the
comprehensive sign program will enhance the overall development and
will more fully accomplish the purposes and intent of this subchapter;
6. Approval of a comprehensive sign program shall not authorize the use of
signs prohibited by this subchapter; and
7. Review and approval of a comprehensive sign program shall not consider
the signs' proposed message content.
Findings shall be made by the Community Development Director for each
comprehensive sign program, including:
1. The comprehensive sign program complies with the purpose of this
subchapter, and the Baldwin Park Design Guidelines;
2. Proposed signs enhance the overall development and are in harmony
with other signs included in the plan, and with the structures they identify
and with surrounding development-,
CAAmyAMY\W0RD\Reports\GounciI Reports\AZC-174 #3.DOC
Ordinance 1359
October 2, 2013
Paqe 4
3. The comprehensive sign program contains provisions to accommodate
future revisions that may be required because of changes in use or
tenants; and
4. The comprehensive sign program complies with the standards of this
subchapter, except that flexibility is allowed with regard to sign area,
number, location, and/or height to the extent that the signs proposed
under the comprehensive sign program will enhance the overall
development, achieve superior quality design, and will more fully
accomplish the purposes of this subchapter.
In order to be business friendly, staff is proposing the Community Development Director
shall have the approval authority for a comprehensive sign program. Should an
Applicant be aggrieved by the Director's decision regarding a comprehensive sign
program, the decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission and ultimately the
City Council as the final authority (BPMC Section 153.210.150).
A sign program application shall be created for a comprehensive sign program and
shall include all the information and materials required by the Planning Division for a
Sign Program Review including a filling fee.
Although signs can provide a reliable means of advertising for a business, they also can
be detrimental to aesthetics and welfare of the community. By implementing the
proposed ordinance which contains new requirements and development standards, the
City can maintain its local land use control and also improve the community's aesthetics
with the removal of older, out-of-date signs throughout various commercial
developments to new signs that create a unified architectural statement and are
appropriate given the scale of developments and other factors.
At their meeting on August 28, 2013 the Planning Commission voted 4-0 to adopt PC
13-22, recommending that the City Council adopt the Negative Declaration of
Environmental Impact and approve that addition of Section 153.170.107 to the City's
Municipal Code. This recommendation includes language that the Community
Development Director has review and approval authority for any proposed
comprehensive sign program.
However, since the Planning Commission took action, staff has included an option for
the City Council to include language in the ordinance that has the Planning Commission
be the approval authority of any proposed comprehensive sign program as opposed to
the Community Development Director.
CAAmyAM)'\W0RD\Reports\CounciJ ReporiMAZC-174 #3.DOC
Ordinance 1359
October 2, 2013
Paae 5
I M Ley-,I a 10N
This report has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney's Office as to legal
form and content.
#1, Resolution 2013-035
#2, Initial Study and Negative Declaration
#3, Proposed Draft Ordinance 1359
Report Prepared By: Humberto Quintana, Community Development Liaison.
CAAmy\AMYXW0RD\Reports\CounCj1 ReportsWA2C-174 #3.DOC
[:+'7` ► •
RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -035
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BALDWIN PARK APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE
NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY'S MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATING TO COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PROGRAMS
(LOCATION: ALL COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND
MIXED USE ZONES WITHIN THE CITY OF BALDWIN
PARK; APPLICANT: KAISER PERMANENTS; CASE NO.:
AZC -174)
WHEREAS, the City of Baldwin Park currently does not permit
comprehensive sign programs within the City; and
WHEREAS, owners of commercial developments, at times, experience a
hardship given current sign development standards given certain irregularities with the
site; and
WHEREAS, Kaiser Permanente approached the City about amending the
code to allow for comprehensive sign programs; and
WHEREAS, the creation of a comprehensive sign program creates a
unified architectural statement; and
WHEREAS, the proposed regulations have been proposed to permit
comprehensive sign programs by amending the Baldwin Park Municipal Code, adding
Section 153.170.107 relating to the creation of a Comprehensive Sign Program. Case
Number AZC -174 (the "Project ") as described more particularly in the information on file
with the Planning Division;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN
PARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
that:
SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby find, determine and declare
A. An Initial Study and Negative Declaration of Environmental
Impact were prepared for the Project in accordance with the provisions of
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State CEQA
Guidelines.
B. The Initial Study and Negative Declaration were made
available to the public for review and comment as required by law.
C. A properly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning
Commission of the City of Baldwin Park on August 28, 2013, at which time
Resolution 2013 -035
Page 2
evidence was heard on the Initial Study and Negative Declaration. At the
hearing, the Planning Commission fully reviewed and carefully considered
that evidence, no additional comments were received at the hearing, and
the Planning Commission recommended approval of the negative
declaration for the Project.
D. A properly noticed public hearing was held by the City
Council of the City of Baldwin Park on October 2, 2013, at which time
evidence was heard on the Initial Study and Negative Declaration. At the
hearing, the City Council fully reviewed and carefully considered them,
together with any comments received during the public review period.
SECTION 2. The City Council reviewed and considered the Negative Declaration
of Environmental Impact and determined the Project will not have a significant impact on
the environment. The Negative Declaration is therefore hereby approved.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and
forward a copy hereof to the Secretary of the Planning Commission.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 2nd day of October 2013.
MANUELLOZANO
MAYOR
Resolution 2013-035
Page 3
ATTEST:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SS.
CITY OF BALDWIN PARK I
1, ALEJANDRA AVILA, City Clerk, of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Resolution No. 2013-035 was duly and regularly approved and
adopted by the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park at a regular meeting thereof,
held on the 2nd day of October, 2013 by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS.-
ABSTAIN- COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ALEJANDRA AVILA
CITY CLERK
AZC-1 74
Auaust, 2013
FxYllailglaim mI=4jW=* -4
11DO101 6 1 U :4 :11 W b".11 LTA :M Lei 0 1 W 10WOM MAI M
Initial Study
Prepared by:
City of Baldwin Park
14403 East Pacific Avenue
Baldwin Park, CA 91706
:1 1" ;A
M
Revised April 20 10
DATE.- July 30, 2013
APPLICANT- City of Baldwin Park
TYPE OF PERMIT: Amendment to the Municipal Code
FILE NO.: AZC-174
LOCATION OF PROJECT: All commercial, industrial and mixed use zones
throughout the City of Baldwin Park.
DESRIPTION OF PROJECT: An amendment to the City's Municipal Code
adding Section 153.170.107 to the Baldwin Park Municipal Code relating addition
of language which would permit Comprehensive sign programs
It is the opinion of the
F-1 Zoning Administrator
FX_1 Planning Commission
F-1 City Council
F-1 Other
that, upon review of the project, it has determined that the project will not have a
significant effect upon the environment.
Mitigation Measures ❑1 are attached
F_x] are not required
__W._
(Signature)
-Community Development Liaison
(Title)
Date(s) of Public Notice:
X Posting at three (3) locations- City Hall, Ester Snyder Community Center,
and Barnes Park, August 1, 2013
Posting of the properties
Written notice to affected business owners
\\backupnaskMyDocumentsFoiders\hquintana\My Documents\Humberto\Planning\Code Ammendment\AZC-174 Negatve dedaration.doc
INITIAL STUDY
. AM
,'°'"'^
1 Project Title: /\ZC-174
2. Lead agency name and address
City Df Baldwin Park
Planning Division
144O3E Pacific Avenue
Baldwin Park, CA 91706
(O28) @13-52O1
3. Contact person and phone number: Humberto Quintana, Community Development Liaison
/836\813-5201.
4. Project location: The proposed project may impact those zoning designations in which non-
exempt signs are permitted.
5. General Plan Designation(s): Neighborhood CommerCi8/, General Commercio|, Mixed USe,
Commercial-industrial, General Industrial, Public Facilities and Parks.
0� Zoning:
DESIGNATION LABEL
EXPLANATION
C-1
Neighborhood Commercial
C-2
General Commercial
MU-1
Mixed Use 1
MU-2
Mixed Use 2
F-C
Freeway Commercial
I-C
Industrial Commercial
I
Industrial
OS
Open Space
7. Description ofproject: (Describe the whole 3CtOO invo!ved, including but not limited to later
phases Of the project, and any secondary, support, or off-site features necessary for its
implementation, Attach additional sheets ifneceoS@ry.\
Proposed project involves changes to the City's Municipal Code relating to
Sign regulations. The proposed change will allow for the creation Of
Comprehensive Sign Program(s) for OOD-exarnDt signs in order to create a
unified architectural statement. A Comprehensive Sign Program provides a
means for the flexible application of Sign regulations in order to provide
incentive and latitude in the design and display of nnu|dp|G signs and to
achieve, not circumvent, the intent subchapter 153.170. The Comprehensive
Sign Program may modify the standards relating to sign nurnber. size, height.
i||UmiO@tiOR. }oCmtion, orientation, or other aspects of signs.
8. Surrounding land uses and setting: Briefly describe the project's surroundings:
AZC-174
August, 2013
Incorporated in 1958' the City of Baldwin Park is located approximately 17 rni/ea
east of downtown Los Angeles. The intersection of the |-10 (San Bernardino) and
1-805 /San Gabriel River) freeways lies near the southwest corner of this 8.8
square mile City. Although Baldwin Park is predominantly a naaidenho| bedroom
cononnunih/, recent efforts have placed a greater emphasis on promoting
commercial and industrial land uses. However, the City is near ''bui|d-out^,
focusing efforts on the Redevelopment of land, especially within close proximity to
the freeway and within the City's Downtown area.
According to the 2O1O Cenous, Baldwin Park has approximately 75/48O persons.
This ia more than double the population in19OU. Baldwin Park is predominantly a
Hispanic working class ounnnnunity` since the 1990 Census. the City continues to
experience on-going increases with its Asian population, even though a decrease
in population was experienced between the 20OO Census and the 201U Census.
Furthermore, the City has a considerably larger than average household size than
the County average, suggesting increased pressure on the City's housing stock
and the provision of services.
9. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., pennU3. financing approval,
or participation agreement.)
NO other public agencies other than the Planning Commission and/or City
Council of the City of Baldwin Park are required to approve this amendment to
the City's Municipal (Zoning) Code.
Revised April 2010
C""'ITY OF BALDWIN PARK
....... ., .. NOT 70 SCALE
AZC-174
Auaust, 2013
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project involving at least
one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages:
[]
Aesthetics
O
Agnnultore, and Forestry Resources
O
Air Quality
[]
Biological Resources
[]
Cultural resources
[]
Geology /Soils
E]
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
E]
Hazard & Hazardous Materials
El
Hydrology [Water Quality
El Land Use / Planning
[] Population /Housing
F-I Transportation / Traffic
[] Mineral Resource
[] Public Services
E] Utilities / Service Systems
DETERMINATION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
El Noise
0 Recreation
[] Mandatory Findings uf
Significance
| find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
| find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect nn the environment, there will not
bea significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made bymragreed to by
the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
} find that the proposed project MAY have m significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
{ find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impaof or ^pobsnbaUv significant
unless mitigated" impact om the environment, but et least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in
an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation
measures based the earlier analysis ea described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL |K8APCT
REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
|Und that although the proposed project could have esignificant effect on the environment, because all
potentially dAnhicmnd effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier BR or NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 0d have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to
that earlier BR or NEGATIVE [}ECLARAT|(}N, including revisions or mitigation measures that are
innp000yp90 the ppposmd project, nothing further isrequired.
Date
Revised April 2010
AZC-1 74
August. 2013
The explanation of each issue should identify:
a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and
b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than
significance.
1. AESTHETICS Would the
project:
Less Than
Potentially Significant With
Significant Impact Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
No Impact
Significant Impact
i a) Have a substantial adverse
effect on a scenic vista?
b) Substantially damage
scenic resources, including
but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a state scenic
highway?
— ---------- --- - ------
C) Substantially degrade the
existing visual character or
quality of the site and its
surroundings?
d) Create a new source of
substantial light or glare which
would adversely affect day or
nighttime views in the area?
a-d) No Impact. Due to its administrative nature, the Project will not result in any physical
changes to the environment. Adoption of the Zoning Code Amendment which includes
flexibility in the application of sign regulations to allow sign programs does not have the
potential to affect designated scenic vistas or other scenic resources. Individual
comprehensive sign program applications will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis in
accordance with CEQA at the time a complete application request is received by the City. No
aesthetic impacts will occur as a result of the adoption of the proposed Amendment.
Revised April 2010
AZC-174
August, 2013
ti l
11. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY Po tenaly
Less Than
Less Than
Significant With
Significant
RESOURCES Impact
Significant No Impact
Mitigation
Impact
Incorporated
In determining whether impacts to agricultural
resources are significant environmental effects,
lead agencies may refer to the California
Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site
Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the
California Dept. of Conservation as an optional
model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture
and farmland. In determining whether impacts
to forest resources, including timberland, are
significant environmental effects, lead agencies
may refer to information compiled by the
California Department of Forestry and Fire
Protection regarding the state's inventory of
forest land, including the Forest and Range
Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy
Assessment project- and forest carbon
measurement methodology provided in F orest
Protocols adopted by the California Air Resource
Board. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland,
or Farmland of Statewide Importance
(Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared
pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the California Resources
1 Agency, to non-agricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural
use, or a Williamson Act contract?
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause
I rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public
Resources Code section 12220 (g)), timberland
(as defined by Public Resources Code section
4526), or timberland zoned Timberland
Production (as defined by Government Code
section 51104(g))?
d) Results in loss of forest land or conversion of
forest land to non-forest use?
e) Involve other changes in the existing
environment which, due to their location or
nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to
non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land
to non-forest?
Revised April 2010
AZC-174
August, 2013
a-c) No Impact. Due to its administrative nature, the Project will not result in any physical
changes to the environment. The adoption of the proposed Amendment will not in itself have
a detrimental effect on Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
Importance. Any subsequent development consistent with the amended Municipal Code will
be reviewed as a project under CEQA, and therefore will be subject to a more detailed level
of environmental scrutiny.
Ill. AIR QUALITY
Less Than Less Than
Potentially Significant With No
Significant
Significant Mitigation Impact Impact
Impact 1 Incorporated
Where available, the significance criteria
established by the applicable air quality
management or air pollution control district
may be relied upon to make the following
I determinations. Would the roject:
1 a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation
of the applicable air quality plan?
b) Violate any air quality standard or
contribute substantially to an existing or
r9jected air quality violation?
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net
increase of any criteria pollutant for which
the project region is non-attainment under
an applicable federal or state ambient air
quality standard (including releasing
emissions which exceed quantitative
thresholds for ozone precwrsors;L?
d) Expose
sensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations?
F e )Create objectio nable odors affecting a
substantial number 0 f people?
a-e) No Impact. The adoption of the proposed Amendment will not conflict with or obstruct
the implementation of any applicable air quality plans. Further, it is incumbent upon the City
to comply with all applicable air quality standards established by the South Coast Air Quality
Management District (SCAQMD). Specifically, and when proposed and approved, the City
shall develop and implement appropriate measures to limit and control emissions resulting
from project-related construction activities, as well as implement SCAQMD strategies and
policies directed toward the reduction of mobile source emissions generated by project-
related traffic. All necessary SCAQMD permits will also be acquired (e.g. any permits
required for operation of equipment).
The adoption of the proposed Amendment will not result in a cumulatively considerable net
increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under any
applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which
exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors).
The adoption of the proposed Amendment will not expose receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations. This conclusion is based on the aforementioned environmental commitments
Revised April 2010
AZC-1 74
August, 2013
and the fact that any subsequent development projects will be assessed individually under
CEQA.
The Project itself will not create any objectionable odors. Subsequent potential impacts are
tempered by the application of the environmental commitments, and by the City's ability and
authority to review activities at the time a specific development project is proposed.
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Potentially
Significant
Less Than
Significant With
Less Than
Significant
No
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
Impact
Incorporated
-Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either
directly or through habitat modifications, on
any species identified as a candidate,
sensitive or special status species in local or
regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by
the California Department of Fish and Game
or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any
riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional plans,
policies, regulations, or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on
federally protected wetlands as defined by
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including,
but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal,
etc.) through direct removal, filling,
hydrological interruption, or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of
any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife
species or with established native resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use
of native wildlife nursery sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or
ordinances protecting biological resources,
such as a tree preservation policy or
ordinance?
0 Conflict with the provisions of an adopted
Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural
Community Conservation Plan, or other
approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?
a-f) No Impact. The City of Baldwin Park is completely urbanized and devoid of native
vegetation. No endangered or threatened plants or animals are known to exist within the City.
As described in the project description, the proposed amendment is of an administrative
nature and will not directly impact biological resources.
Revised April 2010
AZC -174
August, 2013
a -d) No Impact. The City of Baldwin Park is generally affected by extensive urban
development, and in this regard, many cultural resources that may have existed at one time
within the City have either been successfully catalogued, recovered, and /or protected
consistent with the CEQA requirements, or been removed and /or destroyed. Further, as
previously stated, the Project is purely an administrative act, and will not directly impact
cultural resources.
VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Potentially
Less Than
Significant With
Less Than
No
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
Impact
Would the project:
Impact
p
Incorporation
Impact
p
Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource as defined
[�
in Section 15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archaeological resource
Q
pursuant to Section 15064.5?
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or unique
[�
-geological feature?
d) Disturb any human remains, including
[�(
those interred outside of formal cemeteries?
a -d) No Impact. The City of Baldwin Park is generally affected by extensive urban
development, and in this regard, many cultural resources that may have existed at one time
within the City have either been successfully catalogued, recovered, and /or protected
consistent with the CEQA requirements, or been removed and /or destroyed. Further, as
previously stated, the Project is purely an administrative act, and will not directly impact
cultural resources.
VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Potentially
Significant
Less Than
Significant With
Less Than
Significant
No
Impact
Mitigation
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential
substantial adverse effects, including
the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on
other substantial evidence of a known fault?
Refer to Division of Mines and Geology
Special Publication 42.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
[�(
iii) Seismic - related ground failure, including
liquefaction?
iv) Landslides?
[�
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the
loss Of topsoil?
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is
unstable, or that would become unstable as
a result of the project, and potentially result
[�
in on or off -site landslide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
Revised April 2010
AZC-174
Auaust. 2013
V1. GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in
Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code
(1994), creating substantial risk to life or
property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately
supporting the use of septic tanks or
alternative waste water disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the
disposal of waste water?
a) No Impact. The Southern California area is acknowledged as a seismically active region.
Accordingly, it is anticipated that environmental assessments prepared for uses that may be
operated pursuant to the amended Municipal Code will provide project-specific seismic
analyses, design recommendations, and appropriate mitigation of any potentially significant
seismic impacts.
In this regard, building officials and engineers have long-recognized the potential impacts of
earthquakes and ground shaking on structures. Appropriate measures which reduce the
effects of earthquakes are identified in the California Building Code (CBC), including specific
provisions for seismic design of structures. Short of a catastrophic event, design of structures
in accordance with the CBC and current professional engineering practices are sufficient to
reduce the effects of ground shaking below the level of significance. Further, as evidenced by
extensive development within the City, it is anticipated that any future site-specific geologic or
soils constraints which may be encountered can be accommodated within the context of
existing seismic design regulations, standards, and policies.
As supported by the preceding discussion, the Project does not have the potential to expose
people or structures to potential substantial adverse seismic effects. Similarly, the Project
does not have the potential to: result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil,
encourage or allow facilities to be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that
would become unstable as a result of the Project, and potentially result in on- or off-site
landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse-, or encourage or allow
facilities to be located on expansive soil, creating substantial risks to life or property.
b) No Impact. Due to its administrative nature, the Project does not have a direct impact on
the soil. Environmental review of proposals submitted pursuant to the Amendment will
provide for project-specific soil analysis, as well as the mitigation measures for any soil
conditions that may affect, or be affected by, such proposed projects. Compliance with
NPDES permit requirements, including an application of Best Management Practices (BMPs),
further reduces potential soils impacts. The Project will have no impact in this regard.
c,d) No Impact. As evidenced by extensive urban development, the City is generally suitable
for development, and is not substantially limited by unstable geologic conditions including
potential susceptibility to landsliding, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse.
Nor is there evidence that the City is widely affected by expansive soils conditions. Future
Revised April 2010
AZC-174
August, 2013
development proposals will provide project-specific environmental review to determine
geologic/expansive soils impacts, and appropriate mitigation measures that may be required.
It is anticipated that compliance, with applicable provisions of the CBC, together with
application of accepted geologic/soils engineering practices will typically provide appropriate
design solutions for geologic conditions that may be encountered within the City, as such, no
impacts are anticipated.
e) No Impact. The City is generally improved with sanitary sewers connected to wastewater
treatment facilities, which would provide for treatment of wastewater. Since the proposed
amendment is an administrative act only, the existing use of septic tanks or alternative waste
water disposal systems that are currently operational will not be impacted.
VII. GREENHOUSE EMISSIONS
Potentially
Significant
Less Than
Significant With
Less Than
Significant
No
MATERIALS
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
impact
Incorporated
Would the project:
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either
directly or indirectly, that may have a significant
F71
impact on the environment?
b) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting
the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water
FRI
disposal systems where sewers are not available
21
for the disposal of waste water?
a-b) No Impact. Due to its administrative nature, it is not anticipated that the Project will not
result in any physical changes to the environment. The Project does not have the potential to
generate new direct or indirect greenhouse gas emissions that may have an impact on the
environment.
VIII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS
Potentially
Less Than
Significant With
Less Than
No
MATERIALS
Significant
Impact
Mitigation
Significant
Impact
Impact
Incorporated
Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or
the environment through the routine transport,
F71
use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or
the environment through reasonably
foreseeable upset and accident conditions
21
involving the release of hazardous materials
into the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle
hazardous or acutely hazardous materials,
substances, or waste within one-quarter mile
of an existing or proposed school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a
list of hazardous materials sites compiled
pursuant to Government Code Section
65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a
significant hazard to the public or the
Revised April 2010
AZC-174
August, 2013
VIII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS
Potentially
Less Than
'significant With
Less Than
No
MATERIALS
Significant
Impact
Mitigation
Significant
Impact
Impact
Incorporated
environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land
use plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public airport or
public use airport, would the project result in a
safety hazard for people residing or working in
the project area?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private
airstrip, would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working in the
project area?
g) Impair implementation of or physically
interfere with an adopted emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation plan?
h) Expose people or structures to a significant
risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland
fires, including where wildiands are adjacent
to urbanized areas or where residences are
intermixed with wildlands?
a-c) No Impact. Adoption of the proposed Amendment will not create a significant hazard to
the public or environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous
materials. Nor will it create a significant hazard to the public or environment through
reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the likely release of
hazardous materials into the environment.
The Project will not create the potential to emit hazardous emissions or involve the handling
of hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances or waste within one quarter mile of
an existing or proposed school. Any subsequent project that would be undertaken pursuant to
the amended Municipal Code would be required to investigate the implications of hazardous
materials. The study will include a complete assessment of potential hazards related to the
site and include measures to mitigate any identified impacts of the project.
d) No Impact. Approval of the Project would not impact any sites identified on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. As
previously stated, any subsequent proposal which would be undertaken pursuant to the
amended Municipal Code would be reviewed pursuant to CEQA and would be required to
conduct a hazardous materials assessment. The study would include a complete assessment
of potential hazards related to the site and develop any requisite mitigation.
e,f)
• Impact. No public • private airstrips are located within the City • Baldwin Park. The
adoption • the proposed Amendment would not result in a safety hazard for people residing
• working in the project area. Any subsequent development in accordance with the
Revised April 2010
AZC -174
August, 2013
proposed amendment would be reviewed pursuant to CEQA at the time a complete
application is submitted for review and consideration.
g) No Impact. The Project does not propose, nor require, impairment or interference with an
adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan.
h) No Impact. No wilderness areas exist within the City, obviating any potential wildfire
hazards. Urban fire hazards within the City are largely related to structural fires, and are
typically due to carelessness and /or negligence. The adoption of the proposed Amendment
will not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving
wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences
are intermixed with wildland areas.
IX. HYDROLOGY AND WATER
Potentially
Less Than
Significant With
Less Than
No
QUALITY
Significant
Impact
p
Mitigation
Significant
Impact
p
Impact
Incorporated
Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or
waste discharge requirements?
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies
or interfere substantially with ground water
recharge such that there would be a net deficit
in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local
groundwater table level(e.g. the production
rate of pre0- edisting nearby wells would drop
to a level which would not support existing
land uses or planned uses for which permits
have been granted)?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage
pattern of the site or area, including through
the alteration of the course of a stream or
Q
river, in a manner which would result in
substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site?
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage
pattern of a site or an area, including through
the alteration of the course of a stream or
river, or substantially increase the rate or
amount of surface runoff in a manner which
would result in flooding on- or off -site?
e) Create or contribute runoff water which
would exceed the capacity of existing or
planned stormwater drainage systems or
provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff?
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water
quality?
g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood
hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood
Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate
Map or other flood hazard delineation map?
Revised April 2010
AZC-174
August, 2013
IX. HYDROLOGY AND WATER
Potentially
Less Than
Significant With
Less Than
No
QUALITY
Significant
Impact
Mitigation
Significant
Impact
Impact
Incorporated
h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area
structures which would impede or redirect
flood flows?
i) Expose people or structures to a significant
risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding,
including flooding as a result of the failure of a
levee or dam?
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?
a,f) No Impact. Approval of the Project would not violate any water quality standards, nor
would it degrade water quality. As previously stated, the Project involves only administrative
changes to the Municipal Code. The area encompassing the City of Baldwin Park is currently
regulated by NPDES permit and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)
requirements supporting federal water quality standards and criteria established under the
Clean Water Act (CWA). Requirements and procedures established under these regulations
typically act to mitigate potential water quality impacts of new development, including any
future facilities that may be implemented pursuant to the amended Municipal Code. Further,
consistent with the requirements of CEQA, project-specific environmental analyses will be
performed on any future projects or facilities. On a project-by-project basis, these analyses
will individually assess potential water quality impacts and provide any mitigation measures if
necessary.
b) No Impact. The Project does not have the potential to directly affect groundwater supplies
or recharge. The City is generally served by three (3) local water companies (Valley County
Water District, San Gabriel Valley Water Company, and Valley View Mutual Water
Company), and does not substantially rely on direct groundwater withdrawals. Further, it is
not anticipated that any uses operated pursuant to the proposed Amendment would
extensively utilize groundwater through direct withdrawals, nor would those uses substantially
interfere with, or alter existing groundwater withdrawals.
c,d,e) No Impact. The City generally does not contain significant water courses. However,
the San Gabriel River is located along the City's western boundary and Big Dalton Wash and
Walnut Creek Wash traverse the eastern and southern portion of the City. As discussed
previously, compliance with federal CWA and relevant NPDES permit requirements will
effectively mitigate any potentially adverse impacts of storm water discharges within the City.
Uses operated pursuant to the proposed Amendment will individually assess potential
drainage system impacts, and mitigation measures will be provided if necessary.
g,hJ) No Impact. No development will be implemented with approval of this Project. As such,
there is no potential for flood hazards associated with the proposed Amendment. Future
individual environmental analyses will assess potential flood hazards and provide mitigation
measures as necessary. Typical design solutions and/or mitigation would involve proper
Revised April 2010
AZC -174
August, 2013
facilities orientation(s); grading and drainage improvements and /or creation of storm water
retention /detention areas.
j) No Impact. The City is not subject to significant hazards due to seiche, tsunami, or
mudflow.
k,l,m,n) No Impact. The construction of facilities is not proposed as part of the Project
considered in this Initial Study. As such, the potential for increased stormwater runoff does
not exist. In addition, the Project area is currently developed with urban uses and is not
located proximate to any significant natural watercourses.
X. LAND USE AND PLANNING
Potentially
Significant
Less Than Significant With
Less Than
Significant
No
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
Impact
incorporated
Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established
community?
[�
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan,
policy, or regulation of an agency with
jurisdiction over the project (including, but not
limited to the general plan, specific plan, local
coastal program, or zoning ordinance)
adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect?
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat
conservation plan or natural community
[�
conservation plan?
a -c) No Impact. The proposed Amendment is a change to the requirements of the Municipal
Code. If the proposed Amendment is approved, it will become part of the Municipal Code
and therefore would be considered consistent. The Project proposes no changes to specific
land use designations, as such, the potential to divide an established community or conflict
with any land use or conservation plans does not exist.
XI. MINERAL RESOURCES
Potentially
Significant
Less Than
Significant With
Less Than
Significant
No
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
Impact
Incorporated
Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known
mineral resource that would be of value to the
[�
region and the residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -
important mineral resource recovery site
delineated on a local general plan, specific
plan, or other land use plan?
a,b) No Impact. The entire City of Baldwin Park has been designated by the State Geologist
as a Mineral Resource Zone 2 (MRZ -2), an area where "adequate information indicates that
significant mineral deposits are present or where it is judged that a high likelihood for their
Revised April 20 90
AZC -174
August, 2013
presence exists." The City of Baldwin Park, as well as its adjacent cities, all contain
aggregate resources, commonly known as gravel. However, because the City is almost
entirely built -out, all such areas containing significant resources are largely developed, and
thus inaccessible. Established urban uses are incompatible with mineral extraction and /or
surface mining activities. The General Plan does not identify or address mineral resources
that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State. In addition, the
administrative nature of the Project precludes any impact in this regard.
a -d) No Impact. Due to the administrative nature of the proposed Project, it does not have
the potential to directly result in noise impacts.
Potentially
Less Than
Significant with
SigMitigation
Less Than
No
XII. NOISE
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
Impact
Impact
Incorporated
impact
Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of
noise levels in excess of standards
established in the local general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable standards of other
agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of
excessive groundborne vibration or
[✓(
roundborne noise levels?
c) A substantial permanent increase in
ambient noise levels in the project vicinity
[,7f
above levels existing without the project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic
increase in ambient noise levels in the project
vicinity above levels existing without the
project?
e) For a project located within an airport land
use plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public airport or
public use airport, would the project expose
people residing or working in the project area
to excessive noise levels?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private
airstrip, would the project expose people
residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
a -d) No Impact. Due to the administrative nature of the proposed Project, it does not have
the potential to directly result in noise impacts.
Devised April 2010
Potentially
Less Than
Significant with
Less Than
No
XIII. POPULATION AND HOUSING
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
Impact
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
Would the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in an
area, either directly (for example, by proposing
new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for
example, through extension of roads or other
infrastructure)?
Devised April 2010
AZC -174
August, 2013
a) No Impact. Construction of new housing or employment opportunities is not a component
of the Project. As such, the Project will not directly contribute to population growth.
b,c) No Impact. The Project does not involve or propose displacement of any on -site or off-
site housing stock. No impacts relating to displacement of housing will result from the Project.
Potentially
Less Than
significant With
Less Than
No
XIII. POPULATION AND HOUSING
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
Impact
Impact
p
Incorporated
Impact
p
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing
housing, necessitating the construction of
Q
replacement housing elsewhere?
c) Displace substantial numbers of people,
necessitating the construction of replacement
[�
-housing elsewhere?
a) No Impact. Construction of new housing or employment opportunities is not a component
of the Project. As such, the Project will not directly contribute to population growth.
b,c) No Impact. The Project does not involve or propose displacement of any on -site or off-
site housing stock. No impacts relating to displacement of housing will result from the Project.
a -e) No Impact. The City of Baldwin Park is generally well- served by existing fire protection,
police protection, and other public services. Because of the administrative nature of the
Project, it does not have the potential to impact public services.
Revised April 2010
Potentially
Less Than
Significant With
Less Than
No
XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
Impact
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
a) Would the project result in substantial
adverse physical impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically altered
governmental facilities, need for new or
physically altered governmental facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to maintain
acceptable service ratios, response times or
other performance objectives for any of the
public services:
Fire protection?
[�
Police protection?
Q
Schools?
Cd(
Parks?
Other public facilities?
Q
a -e) No Impact. The City of Baldwin Park is generally well- served by existing fire protection,
police protection, and other public services. Because of the administrative nature of the
Project, it does not have the potential to impact public services.
Revised April 2010
AZC -174
Auqust, 2013
a) No Impact. The Project does not propose elements that would result in increased
demands for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities. As such, the
Project does not have the potential to result in increased demands on neighborhood, regional
parks, or other recreational facilities.
b) No Impact. The construction of recreational facilities is not proposed by the Project, nor
will the Project require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities. As such, the
Project will have no impact in this regard.
Potentially
Less Than
Significant With
Less Than
No
XV. RECREATION
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
Impact
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
a) Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other
recreational facilities such that substantial
physical deterioration of the facility would occur
or be accelerated?
b) Does the project include recreational facilities
Q
or require the construction or expansion of
recreational facilities which might have an
adverse physical effect on the environment?
a) No Impact. The Project does not propose elements that would result in increased
demands for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities. As such, the
Project does not have the potential to result in increased demands on neighborhood, regional
parks, or other recreational facilities.
b) No Impact. The construction of recreational facilities is not proposed by the Project, nor
will the Project require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities. As such, the
Project will have no impact in this regard.
Revised April 2010
Potentially
Less Than
Significant With
Less Than
No
XVI. TRANSPORTATION/ TRAFFIC
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
Impact
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
Would the project:
a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordnance or
policy establishing measures of effectiveness for
the performance of the circulation system, taking
into account all modes of transportation including
mass transit and non - motorized travel and
Q
relevant components of the circulation system,
including but not limited to intersections, streets,
highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle
paths, and mass transit?
b) Conflict with an applicable congestion
management program, including, but not limited
to level of service standards and travel demand
measures, or other standards established by the
county congestions management agency for
designated roads or highways?
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns,
including either an increase in traffic levels or a
change in location that result in substantial safety
risks?
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design
feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous
intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm
equipment)?
Revised April 2010
AZC -174
August, 2013
XVI. TRANSPORTATION/ TRAFFIC
Potentially
Significant
Less Than
Significant With
Less Than
Significant
No
SYSTEMS
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
Impact
Incorporated
e) Result in inadequate emergency access?
[�
f) Conflict with adopted policies plans, or
programs supporting alternative transportation
Q
(e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)?
a -f) No Impact. Due to the administrative nature of the proposed Project, it does not have the
potential to result in transportation and circulation impacts. Future projects will be assessed,
consistent with the CEQA requirements, on a project- specific basis. Individual environmental
analyses will assess potential impacts in this regard and provide mitigation measures as
necessary.
XVII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE
Potentially
Less Than
Significant With
Less Than
No
SYSTEMS
Significant
Impact
Mitigation
Significant
Impact
Impact
Incorporated
Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements
of the applicable Regional Water Quality
Q
Control Board?
b) Require or result in the construction of new
water or wastewater treatment facilities or
expansion of existing facilities, the construction
[�
of which could cause significant environmental
effects?
c) Require or result in the construction of new
storm water drainage facilities or expansion of
existing facilities, the construction of which
could cause significant environmental effects?
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to
serve the project from existing entitlements and
resources, or are new or expanded entitlements
needed?
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater
treatment provider which serves or may serve
the project that it has adequate capacity to
�(
serve the project's projected demand in addition
to the provider's existing commitments?
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient
permitted capacity to accommodate the
Q
project's solid waste disposal needs?
g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes
and regulations related to solid waste?
a -g} No Impact. The City of Baldwin Park is generally served by all necessary utilities and
service systems. Due to the administrative nature of the proposed Project, it does not have
the potential to result in impacts to utilities and service systems. On a project - specific basis,
Revised April 2010
AZC -174
August, 2013
individual environmental analyses for subsequent uses implementing the amended Municipal
Code will assess potential utilities and service systems impacts and provide mitigation
measures as necessary for development projects as they are proposed. Generally, potential
utilities and service systems impacts are reduced through capacity improvements, increased
treatment efficiencies via technologic improvements, reduced consumption through
conservation efforts, and efficient technologies and resource reuse /recycling.
XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF
Potentially
Less Than
significant With
Less Than
No
SIGNIFICANCE
Significant
Impact
p
Mitigation
Significant
Impact
p
Impact
Incorporated
a) Does the project have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self- sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ( "Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects of a project
are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of
other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects.)
c) Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects on
R1
human beings, either directly or indirectly?
a) No Impact. The Project is a purely administrative act relating to the creation of a
comprehensive sign program as a means for the flexible application of sign regulations.
Therefore, the Project does not have the potential to significantly degrade the quality of
biological resources, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish
or wildlife population to drop below self - sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, or reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant
or animal.
b) No Impact. As supported by the discussion presented in this Initial Study, the Project is
determined to have no impact on any considered environmental topics. Potential cumulative
effects of the Project are similarly determined to be of no consequence.
c) No Impact. As supported by the preceding environmental evaluation, the Project will not
result in any substantial adverse effects on human beings. Under each environmental
consideration addressed in this Initial Study, the Project is considered to have no impacts.
Revised April 2010
its] '
ORDINANCE NO. 1359
AN ORDINANCE OF CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BALDWIN PARK ADDING SECTION 153.170.107 TO THE
BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO
COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PROGRAMS
WHEREAS, signs located within the City can provide a reliable means of
advertising for a business, they also can be detrimental to the safety, aesthetics and
general welfare of the community;
WHEREAS, owners of commercial developments, at times, experience a
hardship given current sign development standards given certain irregularities with the
site, including the scale and size of buildings, or limited site visibility-,
WHEREAS, the creation of a comprehensive sign program creates a unified
and consistent architectural theme;
WHEREAS, a sign program improves the aesthetics of the community by
providing an incentive and latitude in the design and display of multiple signs, and;
WHEREAS, the overall intent of a comprehensive sign program is to provide
the means for the flexible application of sign regulations in order to provide incentive
and latitude in the design and display of multiple signs and to achieve, while not
circumventing, the intent subchapter 153.170 relating to city appearance, traffic safety
hazards, on-site signage, communication and to protect investment and quality of life.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby
ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. The foregoing recitations are hereby adopted by the City Council as
findings. Based on those findings, the City Council determines the public health, safety
and general welfare of the City of Baldwin Park, its residents, property owners,
businesses and visitors can be enhanced by amending the Baldwin Park Municipal
Code (BPMC) to allow comprehensive sign programs, and it is in the best interest of the
community to amend the BPMC accordingly.
SECTION 2. Based on the foregoing findings and determinations, the BPMC is
amended to add Section 153.170.107, to read in its entirety as follows:
"Section 153.170.107 Comprehensive Sign Programs
A. Purpose. The purpose of a comprehensive sign program is to integrate all of a
nonresidential or mixed use project's signs with the overall site design and the
structures' design into a unified architectural statement. A comprehensive sign
Ordinance 1359 - Page 2
program provides a means for the flexible application of sign regulations in
order to provide incentive and latitude in the design and display of multiple
signs and to achieve, not circumvent, the purpose of this subchapter. Approval
of a comprehensive sign program may modify the standards provided in this
subchapter as to sign number, size, height, illumination, location, orientation, or
other aspects of signs within the limits of this section.
B. Applicability. The approval of a comprehensive sign program shall be
required whenever any of the following circumstances exist.-
1. Whenever the floor area is in excess of 25,000 square feet,
2. Whenever five or more separate commercial or industrial tenant spaces
are present on the same site,
3. Whenever the City Planner determines that a comprehensive sign
program is needed because of special project characteristics (e.g., the
size of proposed signs, limited site visibility, the location of the site
relative to other lots, buildings, or streets, etc.).
C. Approval Authority and Limitation. The Community Development Director
shall be the review authority for a comprehensive sign program.
D. Application Requirements. A sign program application for a comprehensive
sign program shall include all information and materials required by the
Planning Division for a Sign Program Review including a filling fee. Said fee
shall be established by resolution of the City. The applicant shall still be
required to obtain applicable sign permits and pay the related fee.
E. Standards. A comprehensive sign program shall comply with the following
standards:
1 The proposed sign program shall comply with the purpose and intent of
this subchapter;
2. The proposed signs shall enhance the overall development, be in
harmony with, and relate visually to other signs included in the
comprehensive sign program, to the structures and/or developments
they identify, and to surrounding development when applicable;
3. The sign program shall address all signs, including permanent,
temporary, and exempt signs;
4. The sign program shall accommodate future revisions that may be
required because of changes in use or commercial tenants,
Ordinance 1359 - Page 3
5. The sign program shall comply with the standards of subchapter
153.170, except that deviations are allowed with regard to sign area,
total number, location, and/or height of signs to the extent that the
comprehensive sign program will enhance the overall development and
will more fully accomplish the purposes and intent of this subchapter;
6. Approval of a comprehensive sign program shall not authorize the use of
signs prohibited by this subchapter; and
7. Review and approval of a comprehensive sign program shall not
consider the signs' proposed message content.
F. Findings. In order to approve a comprehensive sign program the following
findings shall be made:
1 The comprehensive sign program complies with the purpose of this
subchapter, and the Baldwin Park Design Guidelines-,
2. Proposed signs enhance the overall development and are in harmony
with other signs included in the plan with the structures they identify and
with surrounding development-,
3. The comprehensive sign program contains provisions to accommodate
future revisions that may be required because of changes in use or
tenants; and
4. The comprehensive sign program complies with the standards of this
subchapter, except that flexibility is allowed with regard to sign area,
number, location, and/or height to the extent that the signs proposed
under the comprehensive sign program will enhance the overall
development, achieve superior quality design, and will more fully
accomplish the purposes of this subchapter.
G. Revisions to Comprehensive Sign Programs. The Community Development
Director may approve revisions to a comprehensive sign program if the intent of
the original approval is not affected. Revisions that would substantially deviate
from the original approval shall require the approval of a new/revised
comprehensive sign program by the Planning Commission."
SECTION 3. This ordinance shall go into affect and be in full force and operation
from and after thirty (30) days after its final reading and adoption.
SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and
shall cause a copy of the same to be published in a manner prescribed by law.
Ordinance 1359 - Page 4
PASSED AND APPROVED ON THE _ day of 7 2013
I.Tron-,
ATTEST:
ALEJANDRA AVILA,
CITY CLERK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ss:
CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
1, ALEJANDRA AVILA, City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that
the foregoing ordinance was regularly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council on 1 2013. Thereafter, said Ordinance
No. 1359 was duly approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBER:
,11[91
0
IMMWAMJNMP��
r ..
AN ORDINANCE OF CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BALDWIN PARK ADDING SECTION 153.170.107 TO THE
BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING •
COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PROGRAMS
WHEREAS, signs located within the City can provide a reliable means of
advertising for a business, they also can be detrimental to the safety, aesthetics and
general welfare of the community;
WHEREAS, owners of commercial developments, at times, experience a
hardship given current sign development standards given certain irregularities with the
site, including the scale and size of buildings, or limited site visibility;
WHEREAS, the creation of a comprehensive sign program creates a unified
and consistent architectural theme;
WHEREAS, a sign program improves the aesthetics of the community by
providing an incentive and latitude in the design and display of multiple signs, and-,
WHEREAS, the overall intent of a comprehensive sign program is to provide
the means for the flexible application of sign regulations in order to provide incentive
and latitude in the design and display of multiple signs and to achieve, while not
circumventing, the intent subchapter 153.170 relating to city appearance, traffic safety
hazards, on-site signage, communication and to protect investment and quality of life.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby
ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. The foregoing recitations are hereby adopted by the City Council as
findings. Based on those findings, the City Council determines the public health, safety
and general welfare of the City of Baldwin Park, its residents, property owners,
businesses and visitors can be enhanced by amending the Baldwin Park Municipal
Code (BPMC) to allow comprehensive sign programs; and it is in the best interest of the
community to amend the BPMC accordingly.
SECTION 2. Based on the foregoing findings and determinations, the BPMC is
amended to add Section 153.170.107, to read in its entirety as follows:
"Section 153.170.107 Comprehensive Sign Programs
A. Purpose. The purpose of a comprehensive sign program is to integrate all of a
nonresidential or mixed use project's signs with the overall site design and the
structures' design into a unified architectural statement. A comprehensive sign
Ordinance 1359 - Page 2
program provides a means for the flexible application of sign regulations in
order to provide incentive and latitude in the design and display of multiple
signs and to achieve, not circumvent, the purpose of this subchapter. Approval
of a comprehensive sign program may modify the standards provided in this
subchapter as to sign number, size, height, illumination, location, orientation, or
other aspects of signs within the limits of this section.
B. Applicability. The approval of a comprehensive sign program shall be
required whenever any of the following circumstances exist:
1. Whenever the floor area is in excess of 25,000 square feet;
2. Whenever five or more separate commercial or industrial tenant spaces
are present on the same site;
3. Whenever the City Planner determines that a comprehensive sign
program is needed because of special project characteristics (e.g., the
size of proposed signs, limited site visibility, the location of the site
relative to other lots, buildings, or streets, etc.).
C. Approval Authority and Limitation. The Planning Commission shall be the
review authority for a comprehensive sign program.
D. Application Requirements. A sign program application for a comprehensive
sign program shall include all information and materials required by the
Planning Division for a Sign Program Review including a filling fee. Said fee
shall be established by resolution of the City. The applicant shall still be
required to obtain applicable sign permits and pay the related fee.
E. Standards. A comprehensive sign program shall comply with the following
standards:
1 The proposed sign program shall comply with the purpose and intent of
this subchapter;
2. The proposed signs shall enhance the overall development, be in
harmony with, and relate visually to other signs included in the
comprehensive sign program, to the structures and/or developments
they identify, and to surrounding development when applicable;
3. The sign program shall address all signs, including permanent,
temporary, and exempt signs,
4. The sign program shall accommodate future revisions that may be
required because of changes in use or commercial tenants;
Ordinance 1359 - Page 3
5. The sign program shall comply with the standards of subchapter
153.170, except that deviations are allowed with regard to sign area,
total number, location, and/or height of signs to the extent that the
comprehensive sign program will enhance the overall development and
will more fully accomplish the purposes and intent of this subchapter;
6. Approval of a comprehensive sign program shall not authorize the use of
signs prohibited by this subchapter; and
7. Review and approval of a comprehensive sign program shall not
consider the signs' proposed message content.
F. Findings. In order to approve a comprehensive sign program the following
findings shall be made:
1 The comprehensive sign program complies with the purpose of this
subchapter, and the Baldwin Park Design Guidelines-,
2. Proposed signs enhance the overall development and are in harmony
with other signs included in the plan with the structures they identify and
with surrounding development-,
3. The comprehensive sign program contains provisions to accommodate
future revisions that may be required because of changes in use or
tenants; and
4. The comprehensive sign program complies with the standards of this
subchapter, except that flexibility is allowed with regard to sign area,
number, location, and/or height to the extent that the signs proposed
under the comprehensive sign program will enhance the overall
development, achieve superior quality design, and will more fully
accomplish the purposes of this subchapter.
G. Revisions to Comprehensive Sign Programs. The Community Development
Director may approve revisions to a comprehensive sign program if the intent of
the original approval is not affected. Revisions that would substantially deviate
from the original approval shall require the approval of a new/revised
comprehensive sign program by the Planning Commission."
SECTION 3. This ordinance shall go into affect and be in full force and operation
from and after thirty (30) days after its final reading and adoption.
SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and
shall cause a copy of the same to be published in a manner prescribed by law.
Ordinance 1359 - Page 4
PASSED AND APPROVED ON THE _ day of , 2013
ATTEST:
ALEJANDRA AVILA,
CITY CLERK
Ordinance 1359 - Page 5
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ss-
CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
1, ALEJANDRA AVILA, City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that
the foregoing ordinance was regularly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council on 1 2013. Thereafter, said Ordinance
No. 1359 was duly approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on
by the following vote.-
AYES: COUNCILMEMBER.-
11Nk DAMR��110 M
a a a
CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY
TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOP) 4ffQRN
s ® OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK STAFF
BALDWIN OCT - 2
P - A - R - K
IT NO
TO: Honorable Chair and Board Members of the Successor Agency to the
-
Dissolved Community Development Commission _X AA__ e%:A . —9
FRTN14
Baldwin Park
Vijay Singhal, Chief Executive Officer
Marc Castagnola, AICP, Community Development Ma
SUBJECT: Approval of Resolution No. SA-2013-002 approving a Long Rang
Property Management Plan for each • the real property assets of thl
fo• D • • • • • •
rmer Cmmunity evelopment Cmmissin by the Gverning B
of the Successor Agency to the Community Develop me
Commission • the City • Baldwin Park
To consider adoption of Resolution No. SA-2013-002 approving a Long Range Property
Management Plan prepared pursuant to California Health and Safety Code section
34191.5 for each of the real property assets of the former Community Development
Commission by the City Council as Governing Body of the Successor Agency to the
Community Development Commission
In 2012, the Community Development Commission of the City of Baldwin Park (CDC)
was dissolved pursuant to the California Supreme Court Ruling on ABx1 26 (Dissolution
Act). One of the legal effects of the Dissolution Act is for the Successor Agency, under
the direction of the Oversight Board, to dispose of real property it received from the
dissolved CDC. In the same year, AB1484 was signed into law to provide the process
for the property disposition. The Successor Agency must first prepare a Long-Range
Property Management Plan (LRPMP) that governs the disposition and use of the real
property. As required under Health and Safety Code section 34191.5, the LRPMP shall
be submitted to the Oversight Board and the Department of Finance (DOF) for
approval, no later than six months following the DOF's issuance of the Finding of
Completion to the Successor Agency. The Successor Agency received DOF's Finding
of Completion on April 26, 2013 (see Attachment 1). The deadline for submitting the
LRPMP to DOF is October 26, 2013.
Approval of LRPMP
October 2, 2013
Page 2 of 7
The Long -Range Property Management Plan must include an inventory of each real
property and address the use or disposition of each property in the Community
Redevelopment Property Trust Fund of the Successor Agency. Permitted uses under
the LRPMP include:
• Retention of the property for governmental use;
• Retention of the property for future development;
• Sale of the property; and
• Use of the property to fulfill an enforceable obligation.
DISCUSSION
The LRPMP has been prepared by staff and its consultant and is included as
Attachment 3. Further, to ensure that the LRPMP addressed all the required
components, the DOF Checklist was prepared and is included as Attachment 2.
The LRPMP provides an inventory and addresses the disposition and use of all real
property owned by the Successor Agency. Currently, the Successor Agency owns ten
sites, consisting of 16 parcels and one easement totaling approximately 4.9 acres within
the City. These sites include the following:
• Site 1 (Sterling and Maine). Four parcels totaling 0.43 acres and used for public
parking and the old library building. Property to be transferred to the City and
retained for public parking pending future development.
• Site 2 (Sterling and Maine). 0.65 -acre parcel used for public parking and right of
way. Property to be transferred to the City and retained for public parking
pending future development.
• Site 3 (Garvey Avenue and Big Dalton). 0.48 -acre parcel used by the City Public
Works as storage yard. Property to be transferred to the City and retained for
future development.
■ Site 4 (Bresee Avenue). 0.15 -acre parcel with a single - family residential unit.
Property to be transferred to the Housing Authority for future sale.
■ Site 5 (Olive Street and Center Street). 0.23 -acre parcel used by the City Public
Works as a storage yard and public easement. Property to be transferred to the
City for use by the Public Works Department for storage of material.
■ Site 6 (Morgan Street). 0.16 -acre parcel used as parking for the Family Service
Center. Property to be transferred to the City for parking purposes.
■ Site 7 (Cesar Chavez Drive and Laurens Avenue). 0.42 -acre parcel that is part
of Morgan Park. Property to be transferred to the City for use as a public park.
■ Site 8 (Adjacent to City Hall and Police Station). Four parcels and a parking
easement totaling 0.68 acres and used for parking. Part of the ROEM
Approval of LRPIVIP
October 2, 2013
Page 3 of 7
development project. Property to be transferred to the City to be retained for
future development.
Site 9 (East Ramona Boulevard and Badillo Street). 1.49-acre parcel used for
the Metrolink Park-N-Ride. Property to be transferred to the City for use as
parking lot pending future development.
Site 10 (Laurens Avenue and Morgan Street). 0.70-acre parcel used as public
parking. Property to be transferred to the City to be retained as parking lot
pending future development.
I il Rip "A M16
There is no impact to the General Fund in approving the LRPMP.
- M N
1. Department of Finance Finding of Completion (April 26, 2013)
2. Department of Finance Checklist
3. Baldwin Park Successor Agency Long-Range Property Management Plan
4. Resolution No. SA-2013-002
-I a a# 10 0 E4 �11 0 NOW
DEPARTMENT OF
April 26, 2013
Mr. Vijay Ginghal. Chief Executive Officer
City of Baldwin Park
144O3 East Pacific Avenue
Baldwin Park, CA 91706
Dear Mr. Singhal:
Eowuwo E3. SeoWw JR. ~ csOvERwom
�5 L_ STREET W SACRAIMI�Wrtl CA It
Subject: for a' Finding ufCompletion
The California Department of Finance <Finance\has completed the Finding of Completion for the City of
Baldwin Park Successor Agency.
Finance has completed its review of your documentation, which may have included reviewing supporting
documentation submitted h} substantiate payment or obtaining confirmation from the county auditor-
controller. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code (HSC) section 34179.7, we are pleased to inform you
that Finance has verified that the Agency has made full payment of the amounts determined under HSC
section 34178.O. subdivisions /d\or(e) and HSC section 34183.5,
This letter serves as notification that a Finding of Completion has been granted. The Agency may now
*
Place loan agreements between the former redevelopment agency and sponsoring entity on the
ROPS, as an enforceable obligation, provided the oversight board makes a finding that the loan
was for legitimate redevelopment purposes per HS section 34101.4/U\(1). Loanrepaymente
will be governed by criteria inH{SC section 34181.4(e)(2).
°
Utilize proceeds derived from bonds issued prior to January 1, 2011 in a manner consistent with
the original bond covenants per HSC section 34191.4 (c).
Additionally, the Agency isrequired to submit e ngePmperty Management Plan to Finance for
review and approval, per HSC section 34191.5 (b), within six months from the date of this letter.
.Please direct inquiries to Andrea Scharffer,Gtaff Finance Budget Analyst, m Chris Hill, Principal Program
Budget Analyst, at (916) 445-1546
Sincerely,
" Lo��Govemment Consultant
uz K8[ W1ar:OoataQn0|a, Community Development Manager, City of Baldwin Park
Mo. Rose Tam, Assistant Accounting Manager, City ofBaldwin Park
Ms. Kr(otina Burns, Los Angeles County Department ofAuditor-Controller
California State Controller's 0ff|oa
MoTIMMIRM,
Redevelopment—Administration@dof.ca.gov
Agency Name: Successor Agency to the Community Development Commission of the City of
Baldwin Park
Date Oversight Board Approved LRPMP-. October 8, 2013
Long-Range Property Management Plan Requirements
For each property the plan includes the date of acquisition, value of property at time of acquisition, and an estimate
of the current value.
�]Ymn F� No
For each property the plan includes the purpose for which the property was acquired.
�]Yoa F-1 No
For each property the plan includes the parcel data, including address, lot size, and current zoning in the former
agency redevelopment plan or specific, community, or general plan.
�1Yea [:] No
For each property the plan includes an estimate of the current value of the parcel including, if available, any
appraisal information.
6dyeo El No
Page I of 3
For each property the plan includes anestimate of any lease, rental, orany other revenues generated by the
property, and a description of the contractual requirements for the disposition of those funds.
[X] Yes El No
Foreanh property the plan includes the history of environmental contamination, including designation as a
brownfie|d aite, any related environmental studiea, and history of any nenoediation efforts.
Fx_1Yeo 0 No
For each property the plan includes a description of the property's potential for transit-oriented development and
the advancement of the planning objectives of the successor agency.
[R] Yes [l No
For each property the plan includes a brief history ofprevious development proposals and aotivity, including the
rental or lease of the property.
[K] l No Yon F
o `�
For each property the plan identifies the use or disposition of the property, which could include 1) the retention of
the property for governmental use, 2) the retention of the property for future development, 3) the sale of the
property, ur4) the use of the property to fulfill en enforceable obligation.
WYeu Fl No
The plan separately identifies and list properties dedicated to governmental use purposes and properties retained
for purposes uf fulfilling an enforceable obligation.
FxJYeo Fl No
If applicable, please provide any additional pertinent information that we should be aware of
during our review of your Long-Range Property Management Plan.
Agency Contact Information
Name:
Vijay Singhal
Name:
Marc Castagnola
Title:
Chief Executive Officer
Title:
Community Development Manager
Phone:
(626) 960-4011 X482
Phone:
(626) 960-4011 X477
Email:
VSinghal@baldwinpark.com
Email:
MCastagnola@baldwinpark.com
Date:
October 2, 2013
Date:
October 2, 2013
DeDartment of Finance Local Government Unit Use OnI
I.M.1 mvmm IMRI somm - • EMIAMMANKROM • "'' •- •' M�- HUROAR GROOMIAN-1
i • R` � I 1 � I' '
Prepared for:
Baldwin Park Successor Agency
September 23, 2013
•• r
As required under Health and Safety Code section 34191.5, successor agencies must, within
six months after receiving a Finding of Completion from the California Department of Finance
(DOF), submit for approval to the Oversight Board and to DOF a Long -Range Property
Management Plan ( LRPMP). The LRPMP addresses the disposition and use of all real
properties in the Community Redevelopment Property Trust Fund of the successor agency.
The Baldwin Park Redevelopment Agency (RDA) was activated on November 27, 1974.
Acting as the redevelopment agency for the City of Baldwin Park, the RDA undertook a wide
variety of activities and programs in the interest of the City's long -term benefit. From 1976
to 1986, six redevelopment plans were prepared by the RDA and adopted by the City Council:
San Gabriel River (1976); Puente - Merced (1978); West Ramona Boulevard (1979); Central
Business District (1982); Delta (1983); and Sierra Vista (1986). The adoption of these
Component Redevelopment Plans enabled the RDA to address conditions of blight, promote
economic and community development, and improve affordable housing opportunities in
areas throughout the City. In 2000, five Redevelopment Plans were amended and combined
to create the Merged Redevelopment Project, leaving the Central Business District Project
Area as a separate entity. In 2004, the RDA was reorganized as the Community Development
Commission of the City of Baldwin Park (CDC), and assumed responsibility for furthering the
City's redevelopment program.
With the dissolution of redevelopment agencies in the State under AB X1 26, redevelopment
powers and tax increment funds that previously went to the RDA were no longer available
and were diverted to the underlying taxing entities. Successor Agencies were established to
manage redevelopment projects currently underway, make payments on enforceable
obligations, and dispose of redevelopment assets and properties. This LRPMP is prepared by
the Successor Agency to the dissolved CDC.
C. Summary of Successor Agency -owned Properties
The Successor Agency owns ten sites, consisting of 16 parcels and one easement totaling
approximately 4.9 acres within the City. Figure 1 illustrates the location of the previous
redevelopment project areas and the successor agency -owned sites.
N
Figure 1
Former Community Development Commission's Redevelopment Project Areas
and Successor Agency Owned Property
I
2
Address: 4061 Sterling Way
APN:
a)
8553-011-902
b)
8553-011-903
c)
8553-011-904
d)
8553-011-905
Size: a)
2,949 SF (0.07 acres)
Current Use:
a)
Public parking
b)
4,386 SF (0.10 acres)
b)
Public parking with old
1,574-square foot library
c)
6,007 SF (0.14 acres)
(built in 1974)
d)
5,288 SF (0.12 acres)
c)
Public parking
Total:
18,630 SF (0.43 acres)
d)
Public parking
General Plan: All parcels Mixed Use
Zoning: All parcels MU1 (DO)
Summary of Property Acquisition
Acquired Date: All parcels acquired on 1/12/1998 Purpose of Senior housing development project
Acquisition:
Acquired Value: Parcels together total $276,890 1 Current Value: $592,400 ($31.80/SF)
Revenues: $1.00/year lease agreement
3
Parcel Map
awn .. ,'+�o�
{ 5
60
W
i 5 t 4 {t i3
LL I
50 y{j
J>
JE
¢?Q
13(]3G 5 so 22
27 23 11336
26
/ POP r}+� Tom] ,toy' .t • `l j�.' 3 i�°':. 4� �+
P9ik e 4
j,
L+] 5 �.. t
49 z
'.
?frtC
L545-42
1 N UNE W STREET Fe<,73t3a.CR:Y KNOWN AS PACiF#CA`JI.
a AVE
Y
s
?•Y ryt`.Cry G k 4
PG
IN
PG
Aerial Map
Y�
ry
v
k �
{
0 M
r
' w
I
Existing Conditions
History /Background (History of previous development proposals and activity, including the rental or lease of the
property):
In 1998, the former Baldwin Park Redevelopment Agency (RDA) purchased the four parcels in Site 1 for a total
amount of $276,890 through Low /Mod. Income Housing Funds ( "Housing Funds "). In 1999, the RDA worked with
Kaufman and Broad Multi- Housing Group, Inc. to negotiate a Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) for an
affordable housing project. However, the project was cancelled due largely to concerns voiced by neighboring
property owners about the elimination or reduction of current parking and access to the rear of their commercial
properties on Ramona Boulevard. Since Redevelopment Law required property purchased with Housing Funds to be
developed with affordable housing within five years of the acquisition date, and no development had yet occurred,
the RDA adopted a resolution for a five -year extension to develop affordable housing on this site in 2003. This
extended the development period to 2008. In 2004, the RDA entered into an Exclusive Negotiation Agreement
(ENA) with The Acevedo Group on a proposed mixed -use (residential /retail) development project with related
parking on approximately two acres and consisting of 12 or 13 parcels, which included the four parcels in Site 1. The
proposed development included a residential and retail project with related parking. By 2006, the Community
Development Commission (CDC), entered into an ENA with Bisno Development, LLC to analyze the feasibility of the
potential revitalization of the City's downtown core and Central Business District. The project envisioned 8,000
residential units, 750,000 square feet of retail and entertainment space, 3.0 million square feet of commercial space,
a full- service hotel and charter school. However, due to economic market conditions, the ENA was terminated in
2008.
The 0.43 -acre Site 1 is currently used for public parking and includes a vacant 1,574- square foot structure which was
once the old City library and occupied by the Baldwin Park Historical Society Museum.
Estimated Property Value (Estimate of current value of the parcels including, if available, any appraisal information):
The current estimated property value of Site 1 is $592,400. The four parcels in Site 1 are owned by the Baldwin Park
Successor Agency and are currently used for public parking. The existing structure that was once used as a library is
currently vacant. The current property value of Site 1 was estimated based on a recent appraisal ordered by the City
on another property (Site 9). The appraisal resulted in a value of approximately $30.00 per square foot. Using this
appraised value, in 2011, the CDC purchased eight (8) parcels from the City of Baldwin Park for an average price of
$30.00 per square foot. This price was updated to reflect the increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for Los
Angeles County since 2011, which resulted in an updated price of $31.80 per square foot. Therefore, the estimated
property value of Site 1 was based on the updated average sales price (on a square footage basis) of $31.80 per
square foot. In addition, a review of current vacant land properties available for sale in Baldwin Park averaged
$32.78 per square foot, which indicates that the $31.80 per square foot price is a reasonable assumption.
Contractual Requirements (Estimate of any lease, rental, or any other revenues generated by the property, and a
description of the contractual requirements for the disposition of those funds):
Estimate of Lease /Rental /Other - $1.00 per year lease agreement.
Contractual Requirements for Use of Income /Revenue - None
f3
Environmental Contamination (History of environmental contamination, including designation as a Brownfield site,
any related environmental studies, and history of any remediation efforts:
There are no records indicating site contamination for Site 1, nor is it identified as a Brownfield site. Furthermore,
Site 1 is not included as a potential hazardous waste site or contamination site in the EPA National Priorities List
(NPL), CERCLIS, Cortese list, or identified by the State Water Resources Control Board GeoTracker. While the site is
not contaminated, the entire City is included in San Gabriel Valley (Area 2), which had been identified by EPA as an
area of contaminated groundwater and is an EPA Superfund site with the highest priority for cleanup.
Transit- Oriented Development Potential (Description of the property's potential for transit- oriented development):
Site 1 is located within 300 feet of the Baldwin Park City Hall (across Pacific Avenue) and 800 feet from the Baldwin
Park Metrolink Station. The station is served by Metrolink's San Bernardino Line, which runs regularly, seven days a
week, between Union Station in Downtown Los Angeles and to the cities of San Bernardino and Riverside. Site 1 is in
the Baldwin Park Central Business District and Civic Center area and is served by both Foothill Transit and the Los
Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA). In 2011, the Urban Land Institute (ULI) Los Angeles
prepared a report examining the City's planning efforts and providing direction to achieve the City's goal of creating
a pedestrian - friendly urban center and transit- oriented development experience. The report found that the
adjacency of the City Hall complex to the Metrolink station and the shopping center directly north of Ramona
Boulevard make the Civic Center area (which includes Site 1) a cornerstone for walkable and vibrant community and
retail experience throughout the downtown area. The report recommended mixed -use projects in the Civic Center
area.
Agency's Planning Objectives (Description of the advancement of the planning objectives of the successor agency):
Goal /Objective of the General Plan, Land Use Element is to encourage mixed -use development of residential, retail
and commercial uses in a pedestrian - oriented environment.
Use /Disposition of Property:
The Successor Agency shall transfer the property to the City and retain the property for public parking pending
future development of the site. This site has the greatest potential for development when consolidated with Site 2.
Address: Sterling and Maine APN:
Size: a) 6,590 SF (0.15 acres) parcel Current Use:
Total: 28,370 SF (0.65 acres)
8553-011-901
Public Parking and ROW
General Plan: Public Facilities
Zoning: MU1 (DO)
Summary of Property Acquisition
Acquired Date: 1/25/2011 Purpose of Housing development
Acquired Value: $851,100 Current Value: $902,200 ($31.80/SF)
Revenues: None
Parcel Map
�
GSA" 60
S 23 L0
Uj
co
16&66 2
F-A,
Aerial Map
Existing Conditions
History /Background (History of previous development proposals and activity, including the rental or lease of the
property):
In 2011, the CDC purchased the property (APN 8553 - 011 -901) and adjacent right of way of previous street segments
formerly known as Pacific Avenue and Maine Avenue from the City of Baldwin Park for a total amount of $851,100.
The CDC purchased the property (parcel and street /ROW) from the City to develop affordable housing. Due to its
small size and irregular shape and the economic market conditions, no development has occurred.
Estimated Property Value (Estimate of current value of the parcels including, if available, any appraisal information):
The current property value of Site 2, which includes the 0.15 -acre triangular parcel and adjacent streets and right -of-
ways, is estimated at $902,200. Similar to the methodology used to estimate property value for previous Site 1, the
estimated property value was calculated based on a $31.80 per square foot value. This value is an update of a
recent appraisal ordered by the City on another property (Site 9). The property appraisal indicated a value of
approximately $30.00 per square foot. This price was updated to reflect the increase in the CPI for Los Angeles
County since 2011, which resulted in an updated price of $31.80 per square foot.
Contractual Requirements (Estimate of any lease, rental, or any other revenues generated by the property, and a
description of the contractual requirements for the disposition of those funds):
Estimate of Lease /Rental /Other - None
Contractual Requirements for Use of Income /Revenue - None
Environmental Contamination (History of environmental contamination, including designation as a Brownfield site,
any related environmental studies, and history of any remediation efforts:
There are no records indicating site contamination for Site 2, nor is it identified as a Brownfield site. Furthermore,
Site 2 is not included as a potential hazardous waste sites or contamination site in the EPA NPL, CERCLIS, Cortese list,
or identified by the State Water Resources Control Board GeoTracker. While the site is not contaminated, the entire
City is included in San Gabriel Valley (Area 2), which had been identified by EPA as an area of contaminated
groundwater and is an EPA Superfund site with the highest priority for cleanup.
Transit- Oriented Development Potential (Description of the property's potential for transit - oriented development):
Site 2, which is adjacent to Site 1, is also located within 300 feet of the Baldwin Park City Hall (across the Pacific
Avenue) and 800 feet from the Baldwin Park Metrolink Station. The station is served by Metrolink's San Bernardino
Line, which runs regularly, seven days a week, between Union Station in Downtown Los Angeles and to the cities of
San Bernardino and Riverside. Site 2 is in the Baldwin Park Central Business District and Civic Center area and is
served by both Foothill Transit and MTA. The ULI report found that the adjacency of the City Hall complex to the
Metrolink station and the shopping center directly north of Ramona Boulevard make the Civic Center area (which
includes Site 2) a cornerstone for walkable and vibrant community and retail experience throughout the downtown
area. The report recommended mixed use projects in the Civic Center area.
Wei
Agency's Planning Objectives of the advancement ofthe planning objectives of the successor :
Goal/Objective of the General Plan, Land Use Element is to encourage mixed-use development of residential, retail
and commercial uses in a pedestrian-oriented environment.
Use/Disposition mfProperty:
The Successor Agency shall transfer the property to the City and retain the property for public parking pending
future development of the site. This site has the greatest potential for development when consolidated with
previous Site 1.
11
� Acquired Date:
14173 Garvey Avenu
2[L970SF(U.48acres
1996
Current Use:
General Plan:
Summary ofProperty Acquisition
Purpose of
8460-00-900
City Public Works storage yard
General Commercial
F'C (Freeway Commercial)
[)hQinu( purpose of acquisition was for
commercial development; however,
asset from non-Housing to the Housing
Fund, the parcel was to be developed
for affordable housing or as a mixed-use
Acquired Value: $106,000 (w/ non-Housing Funds) Current Value: $666,800 ($31.80/SF)
$629,100 (w/ Housing Funds)
Revenues: None
Parcel Map
_^ \`
\` \
12
PN
-
`
Aerial Map
Existing Conditions
13
PEI
Planning Objectives of the advancement ufthe planning objectives o/ the successor
Goal/Objective of the General Plan, Housing Element to provide affordable housing in the City. The Economic
Development Element promotes economic development along the 1-10 corridor through the establishment of
businesses most likely to benefit from freeway frontage, and the Land Use Element encourages development of
high-volume commercial center that would benefit from high visibility and good access from 1-10.
The Successor Agency shall transfer the property to the City and retain the property for future development.
15
Address: 4500 Bresee Avenue APN: 8542-017-900
Size: 6,600 SF (0.15 acres) Current Use: Single Family Residential
General Plan: Single Family Residential
Zoning: R1
Summary of Property Acquisition
Acquired Date: 3/30/1999 Purpose of Affordable housing
Acquisition:
Acquired Value: $50,588 Current Value: $300,000 (moderate income limit
valuation estimate, $45.45/SF)
Revenues: None
Parcel Map
16
Aerial Map
Existing Conditions
17
i
Address:
Olive Street and Center Street
APN:
8535-012-904
Size:
10,149 SF (0.23 acres)
Current Use:
Public Works storage yard and public
easement
General Plan:
Public Facilities
Zoning:
CIS
Summary of Property Acquisition
Acquired Date:
8/15/1995
Purpose of
Acquisition:
Redevelop for industrial use
Acquired Value:
NA
Current Value:
$113,000, ($11.13/SF)
Revenues:
None
Parcel Map
A
1275\ OLIVE
0 ST FIG
iC WRO, 1615
L
— —!-� I
SF I
CITY f-10
91001V Tll�t 14400*SF 60
CATY OF tall P) M VASE 100 a 11
R
POR MR co
AiiDi 4 -252 MB Pm e - 42 20
PG SE LINE OR 1630&'06
24 CT
P lkA" 167,�- 66
s &2 01 " I
Z MSF w 6D
P Mai I 82 - LI 2
ry as 40 j 1�
2 s! 99
BDRY LINE TRACT N0.43994 0640*$F
i90
TRACT .. NO 1605
RORY LINE MC r NO 44142
x 9 ;$ BK
RS91.95 OPOR —8542
_ —
M B 20 32,,
19
Aerial Map
Existing Conditions
20
History/Background (History of previous development proposals and activity, including the rental or lease of the
property):
In 1995, the former RDA purchased the real property located north of Plascencia Court and west of Center Avenue.
Site 5, is currently used by the City's Public Works Department as a storage yard. A portion on the site includes a
transmission line tower that is owned and operated by the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (DWP) and
a transmission line easement that traverses to the site. Currently, there is no direct street access to the site. Since
its acquisition by the RDA, there have been no development proposals on the site. Barriers for potential
development include the irregular shape and insufficient size of the property, and the presence of a transmission
line tower and easement. The transmission line easement severely restricts the use of the site to such activities as
nurseries, industrial storage and recreation.
Property Value (Estimate of current value of the parcels including, if available, any appraisal information):
Current Value - The estimated value of the property at Site 5 is $113,000. The value is depressed by the DWP
transmission line easement, which restricts the use of the property. This value was obtained by first calculating the
cost of leasing a vacant storage lot within the vicinity of Site 5. There were only a few comparable properties
available for lease at prices ranging from $0.10 to $0.15 per square foot per month. Given that the subject
property has a transmission tower in the center, occupying a significant part of the parcel, coupled with power lines
going through the property, it was estimated that a fair rent would be $0.50 per square foot per month. A 10,149 -
square foot property leased at $0.50 per square foot per month, and assuming a return of five percent, would
result in a value of approximately $113,000.
Contractual Requirements (Estimate of any lease, rental, or any other revenues generated by the property, and a
description of the contractual requirements for the disposition of those funds):
Estimate of Lease /Rental /Other - None
Contractual Requirements for Use of Income /Revenue - None
Environmental Contamination (History of environmental contamination, including designation as a Brownfield site,
any related environmental studies, and history of any remediation efforts):
Site 5 has no records indicating site contamination, nor is it a Brownfield site. A review of recent sources listing
potential hazardous waste sites, indicate that Site 5 is not included in the EPA NPL, CERCLIS, Cortese, or LOFT list.
As previously mentioned, the San Gabriel Valley (Area 2), which includes the entire City of Baldwin Park, is an area
of contaminated groundwater and is identified as an EPA Superfund site with the highest priority for cleanup.
Transit- Oriented Development Potential (Description of the property's potential for transit - oriented development):
This site does not have a potential for transit oriented development. The transmission tower and lines and the OS
(Open Space) zoning would restrict the development of any residential uses or mixed -uses on the site.
Agency's Planning Objectives (Description of the advancement of the planning objectives of the successor agency):
The use of the site as a storage yard for the City's Public Works Department is consistent with the General Plan
Land Use Element.
Use /Disposition of Property:
The Successor Agency shall transfer the property to the City and retain the property to use as a Public Works
storage yard.
21
Address:
14305 Morgan
APN:
8544-019-910
Size:
7,031 SF (0.16 acres)
Current Use:
Family Service Center parking lot
General Plan:
Public Facilities
Zoning:
R3 (DO)
Summary of Property Acquisition
Acquired Date:
1/16/1986
Purpose of
Acquisition:
Public parking
Acquired Value:
NA
Current Value:
$223,600 ($31.80/SF)
Revenues:
None
:2,& 3
Parcel Map
NN
-PALM.
--- ----- ----
";7 777;
:2,& 3
C/ry
SHEET 2
-Y
26
POR
W
vz
4)
HOUSINO AUIr Y
B
7Z
2 7o�,, 28
'70 7Z
t6
I 7SSf
79 1,41
Ei °roY Y
30 ca
-LMOR GAN
L -L
W
zuj
NN
Aerial Map
Existing Conditions
23
E
Address:
Off Cesar Chavez Drive
APN:
8544-021-904
Size:
18,170 (0.42 acres)
Current Use:
Morgan Park Basketball Courts
General Plan: Parks
Zoning: CIS (DO)
Summary of Property Acquisition
Acquired Date: 5/20/1987 Purpose of NA
Acquisition:
Acquired Value: $143,000 Current Value: $288,903 ($15.90/SF)
Revenues: None
Parcel Map
"I !Rpoot4p,
25
C
X
71
Z
U)
fn
60
Aerial Map
Existing Conditions
26
27
Address:
14426 Ramona
APN:
a) 8554 - 001 -901
4024 Maine
b) 8554- 001 -904
14403 Pacific Avenue
c) 8554 - 001 -907
d) 8554 - 001 -910
e) 8554 - 001 -900 (Parking Easement)
Size:
a) 7,500 SF (0.17 acres)
Current Use:
a), b), c) Police Parking
b) 7,500 SF (0.17 acres)
d) City Hall Parking
c) 7,500 SF (0.17 acres)
e) 25 parking spaces
d) 7,200 SF (0.17 acres)
Total: 29,700 SF (0.68 acres)
General Plan:
All Mixed Use
Zoning:
All MU1 (DO)
Summary of Property Acquisition
Acquired Date:
1/25/2011
Purpose of
Affordable housing
Acquisition:
Acquired Value:
a. $225,000
Current Value:
$1,344,500 (Total of all sites)
b. $225,000
($31.80 /SF for properties a -d, plus
c. $225,000
$400,000 for value of easement)
d. $216,000
e. $400,000
Total: $1,291,000
Revenues:
None
28
Sr
k 4,
Ip -13
107
Parcel Map
EAS7, OAMONA
T %T—� —
Aerial Map
1899
al
Existing Conditions
30
History /Background (History of previous development proposals and activity, including the rental or lease of the
property):
Site 8 and its neighboring properties are the core of the Civic Center area, which includes City Hall, the Police
Department and the Baldwin Park Metrolink station. In 2006, the CDC signed an agreement with Bisno
Development Company to develop the Baldwin Park Central Business District in phases over 15 years, with 8,000
housing units, 3 million square feet of commercial space, 750,000 square feet of retail and entertainment uses, a
300 -room hotel and a charter school. Public improvements would include a pedestrian promenade, a lagoon and
extensive upgrades to the existing Metrolink station. However, with passage of Proposition 99, which limited the
use of eminent domain, and the market downturn, Bisno Development Co. withdrew from the project in 2008. The
City approved an ENA with the Olson Company in 2009 -2010, and subsequently the CDC discussed potential
projects with several architects and developers and entertained preliminary negotiations with SPC and The Bedford
Group in 2010 -2011. However, because of the difficult configuration of the site, limited space due to the immediate
adjacency of two privately held commercial properties that could not be acquired, the lack of parking, and the
necessity of substantial subsidies, these potential projects did not materialize.
In January 2011, the CDC purchased four City -owned parcels and an easement for 25 parking spaces for affordable
housing purposes for approximately $1.29 million. These parcels together identified as Site 8 were purchased with
Low /Mod Income Housing Funds with the intent of developing affordable housing. Three (3) adjacent parcels are
located along Ramona Boulevard, north of City Hall. These parcels are currently used for parking by the Police
Department. The fourth single parcel, which was originally purchased in 2006 by the City from the County as a tax
default property, located along Maine Avenue adjacent to City Hall, is unimproved and vacant and currently used
for parking. In addition, the CDC determined that insufficient space would be available to provide adequate parking
for the proposed affordable housing project and, therefore, the CDC acquired an easement from the City for 25
parking spaces in the recently constructed Civic Center parking structure. The acquisition of the parking easement
also improved the marketability of affordable housing units.
In June 2013, the Successor Agency considered an Affordable Housing Agreement between the City, Successor
Agency and ROEM Development Corporation for a potential transit- oriented mixed -use development between
Ramona Boulevard to the north and the Civic Center to the south. The project would consolidate a series of small
parcels -- including the four parcels in Site 8 -- currently occupied by the Police Department as a parking lot. The
project consists of approximately 72 affordable residential rental units of varying size (one to three - bedroom units),
approximately 6,000 square feet of commercial space along Ramona Boulevard, a public open plaza and a
community room of approximately 3,600 square feet to serve the project residents. Approximately 43 parking
spaces would be available for the commercial component along Ramona Boulevard and between 72 and 107
parking spaces for the residential units would be located in the newly constructed transit center parking structure.
It is anticipated that the first phase of construction would start in December 2014.
Property Value (Estimate of current value of the parcels including, if available, any appraisal information):
Current Value - The current property value of Site 8, which includes four parcels and a 25- parking space easement,
is estimated at $1,344,500. Similar to the methodology used to estimate property values for previous vacant and
parking lot sites, the estimated property value was calculated based on a $31.80 per square foot value. This value is
an update of a recent appraisal ordered by the City on another property (Site 9). The property appraisal indicated a
value of approximately $30.00 per square foot. This price was updated to reflect the increase in the CPI for Los
Angeles County since 2011, which resulted in an updated price of $31.80 per square foot. The parking easement
was valued at $400,000.
31
Contractual Requirements (Estimate of any lease, rental, or any other revenues generated by the property, and a
description of the contractual requirements for the disposition of those funds):
Estimate of Lease/Rental/Other - None
Contractual Requirements for Use of Income/Revenue - None
Environmental Contamination (History of environmental contamination, including designation as a Brownfield site,
any related environmental studies, and history of any remediation efforts:
Site 8 has no records indicating site contamination, nor is it a Brownfield site. A review of recent sources listing
potential hazardous waste sites, indicate that Site 8 is not included in the EPA NPL, CERCLIS, Cortese, or LOFT list.
However, as previously mentioned, the San Gabriel Valley (Area 2), which includes the entire City of Baldwin Park, is
an area of contaminated groundwater and is identified as an EPA Superfund site with the highest priority for
cleanup.
Transit-Oriented Development Potential (Description of the property's potential for transit-oriented development):
Both the City Hall and the Metrolink station are located adjacent to the proposed ROEM project, which proposes a
transit-oriented mixed-use development.
Agency's Planning Objectives (Description of the advancement of the planning objectives of the successor agency):
Goal/Objective of the General Plan, Housing Element is to provide affordable housing. The Land Use Element
encourages mixed-use developments of residential, retail and commercial uses in the Downtown area.
Use/Disposition of Property:
The Successor Agency shall transfer the property to the City and retain the property for future development.
32
Address:
Ramona Boulevard /Badillo
APN:
8437 - 013 -905
Size:
64,904 SF (1.49 acres)
Current Use:
Metrolink Park -N -Ride
General Plan:
Commercial - Industrial
Zoning:
IC (DO)
Summary of Property Acquisition
Acquired Date:
1/25/2011
Purpose of
Acquisition:
Housing development
Acquired Value:
$1,947,132
Current Value:
$2,063,900 ($31.80/SF)
Revenues:
NA
Y
Y
4 f
Y
d
0 153 y
twi
P 21566=51 1
I
P_%4
EW-FiAMONA
}�+
CF 2.0
BK
8-554
Parcel Map
BADiL3 , a
33
ST z
/_�x
Aerial Map
Existing Conditions (Photo)
34
I
35
Address:
Laurens Avenue and Morgan Street
APN:
8544-020-901
Size:
30,670 SF (0.70 acres)
Current Use:
Public Parking
General Plan:
Public Facilities
Zoning:
MW (DO)
Summary of Property Acquisition
Acquired Date:
1/25/2011
Purpose of
Acquisition:
Housing development
Acquired Value:
$920,000
Current Value:
$975,300 ($31.80/SF)
Revenues:
None
Ps
I
5C
Parcel Map
'44 1F
36
7-1
I
rq
7-9
Aerial Map
Existing Conditions
37
History /Background (History of previous development proposals and activity, including the rental or lease of the
property):
In January 2011, the CDC purchased 0.70 acres of land used as a public parking lot located at the rear of retail uses,
along Maine Avenue and Ramona Boulevard in the downtown area. The purchase was funded with Low /Mod
Income Housing Funds with the intent of eventually developing the site with affordable housing /mixed -use
development.
Property Value (Estimate of current value of the parcels including, if available, any appraisal information):
Current Value - The current property value of Site 10 is estimated at $975,300. Similar to the methodology used to
estimate property value for previous vacant and parking lot sites, the estimated property value was calculated based
on a $31.80 per square foot value. This value is an update of a recent appraisal orders by the City on another
property (Site 9). The property appraisal indicated a value of approximately $30.00 per square foot. This price was
updated to reflect the increase in the CPI for Los Angeles County since 2011, which resulted in an updated price of
$31.80 per square foot.
Contractual Requirements (Estimate of any lease, rental, or any other revenues generated by the property, and a
description of the contractual requirements for the disposition of those funds):
Estimate of Lease /Rental /Other - None
Contractual Requirements for Use of Income /Revenue - None
Environmental Contamination (History of environmental contamination, including designation as a Brownfield site,
any related environmental studies, and history of any remediation efforts:
Site 10 has no records indicating site contamination, nor is it a Brownfield site. A review of recent sources listing
potential hazardous waste sites, indicate that Site 10 is not included in the EPA NPL, CERCLIS, Cortese, or LUFT list.
However, as previously mentioned, the San Gabriel Valley (Area 2), which includes the City of Baldwin Park, is an
area of contaminated groundwater and is identified as an EPA Superfund site with the highest priority for cleanup.
Transit - Oriented Development Potential (Description of the property's potential for transit - oriented development):
Site 10 is located in the Baldwin Park Central Business District and is less than one - quarter mile -- walking distance --
from City Hall and the Baldwin Park Metrolink station. The station is served by Metrolink's San Bernardino Line,
which runs regularly, seven days a week, between Union Station in Downtown Los Angeles and to the cities of San
Bernardino and Riverside. Site 10 is in the vicinity of bus service by both Foothill Transit and MTA. The ULI report
found that the adjacency of the City Hall complex to the Metrolink station and the shopping center directly north of
Ramona Boulevard make the downtown area suitable for a walkable and sustainable community.
Agency's Planning Objectives (Description of the advancement of the planning objectives of the successor agency):
Goal /Objective of the General Plan, Circulation Element is to ensure that adequate parking is provided to meet the
existing and future demand.
Use /Disposition of Property:
The Successor Agency shall transfer the property to the City and retain the property as a public parking lot pending
future development.
at
r �
WHEREAS, the staff of the Successor Agency to the Community
Development CoDlDlisSiOO of the City Of B8|dvvD Park ("GUCC8SSO[ AoeOov")
prepared 8 Long-Range Property Management Plan /LRPK8P\' which fully complies
with the requirements for such plans set forth in Health & Safety Code section
34191.5 and identifies each of the FB8| property 8SSetS of the former Community
Development COrDOOiSSiOD Of the City Of B8|dVViO P@[h' including the 8UCceSSO[
Agency's preferred method Uf disposing Of those assets; and
WHEREAS, OD October 2, 2013' at a OOtC8d public hearing the Successor
Agency reviewed the proposed LRPMFz and COOC|Uded that it complied with the
requirements of Health & Safety Code section 34191.5.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Long-Range Property Management Plan prepared pursuant
to Health & Gofeh/ Code Section 34191.5 is hereby approved in the form set forth in
Attachment A and incorporated herein by reference.
Section 2. The staff and the Successor Agency are hereby authorized and
directed, jointly and severally, to affect this resolution.
Section 3. The Executive Director is hereby directed t0 submit the bong
Range Property K8@08ge0eDt Plan LO the Oversight Board for the Successor Agency
and to the California Department of Finance for their review and consideration of
Section 4. The Secretary to this SUCCeSSO[ Agency ShgU certify to the
adoption of this Resolution.
1
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE SUCCESSOR
AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY • PMENT COMMISSION OF
OF 7 PARK THIS 2 DAY OF OCTOBER 2013.
* y • .: •
"aI
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
C• OF •' ANGELES
OF BALDWIN PAR
I, ALEJANDRA AVILA, City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby
certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly approved and adopted
by the Successor Agency of the Community Development Commission of the City
of Baldwin Park at a regular meeting thereof held on October 2, 2013, by the
following vote:
CITY CLERK
2