Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015 01 21NOTICE AND CALL OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO THE MEMBERS OF THE AFOREMENTIONED AGENCIES AND THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Special Meeting is hereby called to be held on WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 21, 2015 at 5:30 P.M. at City Hall — 3 rd Floor Conference Room 307, 14403 East Pacific Avenue, Baldwin Park, CA 91706. Said Special Meeting shall be for the purpose of conducting business in accordance with the attached Agenda. NO OTHER BUSINESS WILL BE DISCUSSED Dated: January 15, 2015 AIW--- Manuel Lozano Mayor AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING 1, Kristi Russell, Chief Deputy City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, certify that I caused the aforementioned Notice and Call of a Special Meeting to be delivered via email (hard copy to follow) to each Member and e-mail to the San Gabriel Valley Tribune, and that I posted said notice as required by law on January 15, 2015. • 03140� Kristi Russell Chief Deputy City Clerk -.111111711 CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING Please note time and meeting JANUARY 21, 2015 location r,.. -.Iv D.M. i CITY HALL - 3rd Floor, Conference Room 307 14403 EAST PACIFIC AVENUE BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 (626) 960 -4011 i Manuel Lozano Cruz Baca Monica Garcia Ricardo Pacheco Susan Rubio - Mayor - Mayor Pro Tern - Councilmember - Councilmember - Councilmember PLEASE TURNOFF CELL PHONES AND PAGERS WHILE MEETING IS IN PROCESS POR FAVOR DE APAGAR SUS TELEFONOS CEL ULARES Y BEEPERS DURANTE LA JUNTA PUBLIC COMMENTS COMENTARIOS DEL PUBLICO The public is encouraged to address the City Se invita al pGblico a dirigirse al Concilio o cualquiera Council or any of its Agencies listed on this otra de sus Agencias nombradas en esta agenda, agenda on any matter posted on the agenda or para hablar sobre cualquier asunto publicado en la on any other matter within its jurisdiction. If you agenda o cualquier terra que este bajo su jurisdiccion. wish to address the City Council or any of its Si usted desea /a oportunidad de dirigirse al Concilio o Agencies, you may do so during the PUBLIC alguna de sus Agencias, podra hacerlo durante el COMMUNICATIONS period noted on the periodo de Comentarios del Pdblico (Public agenda. Each person is allowed three (3) Communications) anunciado en la agenda. A cada minutes speaking time. A Spanish- speaking persona se le permite hablar por tres (3) minutos. Hay interpreter is available for your convenience. un interprete para su conveniencia. CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING — 5:30 P.M. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL: Council Members: Monica Garcia, Ricardo Pacheco, Susan Rubio, Mayor Pro Tern Cruz Baca and Mayor Manuel Lozano PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Three (3) minute speaking time limit Tres minutos sera el imite para hablar THIS IS THE TIME SET ASIDE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL PLEASE NOTIFY THE CITY CLERK IF YOU REQUIRE THE SERVICES OF AN INTERPRETER No action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances exist The legislative body or its staff may: 1) Briefly respond to statements made or questions asked by persons; or 2) Direct staff to investigate and /or schedule matters for consideration at a future meeting. [Government Code §54954.2] ESTE ES EL PERIODO DESIGNADO PARA DIRIGIRSE AL CONCILIO FAVOR DE NOTIFICAR A LA SECRETARIA SI REQUIERE LOS SERVICIOS DEL INTERPRETE No se podra tomar acci6n en a1g6n asunto a menos que sea incluido en la agenda, o a menos que exista algcina emergencia o circunstancia especial. El cuerpo legislativo y su personal podran: 1) Responder brevemente a declaraci6nes o preguntas hechas por personas; o 2) Dirigir personal a investigar y10 fijar asuntos para tomar en consideraci6n en juntas proximas. [Codigo de Gobierno §54954.2] OPEN SESSION/STUDY SESSION MONTABELLO HOUSING PROJECT PRESENTATION — Continued from Study Session held on December 17, 2014 CONSIDERATION OF SECOND UNIT ZONING REVISIONS [BPMC 153.120.350 — 370] RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION 1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9: Potential Case(s): Three (3) 2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—EXISTING LITIGATION Pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9: Name of Case: Hadsell v. City of Baldwin Park, Case No. BC548602 Name of Case: City of Baldwin Park v. City of Irwindale, Case No. BS1 52919 Name of Case: Casas v. City of Baldwin Park, Case No. BS145297 Name of Case: Flores v. City of Baldwin Park, Case No. BC560031 RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION CERTIFICATION 1, Kristi Russell, Chief Deputy City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park hereby certify that- under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, the foregoing agenda was posted on the City Hall bulletin board not less than 24 hours prior to the meeting on January 15, 2015. Kri ti �Russell Chief Deputy City Clerk PLEASE NOTE: Copies of staff reports and supporting documentation pertaining to each item on this agenda are available for public viewing and inspection at City Hall, 2nd Floor Lobby Area or at the Los Angeles County Public Library in the City of Baldwin Park. For further information regarding agenda items, please contact the office of the City Clerk at (626)960-4011ext466 ore -mail krussell()baldwinpark.co . In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the Public Works Department or Risk Management at (626) 960-4011. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable staff to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. (28 CFR 34.102.104 ADA TITLE //) E M A N � • JANUARY 21, 2015 7:00 PM COUNCIL CHAMBER 14403 E. Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, CA 91706 (626) 960 -4011 P , A- R. K Manuel Lozano - Mayor Cruz Baca - Mayor Pro Tern Monica Garcia - Council Member Ricardo Pacheco - Council Member Susan Rubio - Council Member PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES AND PAGERS WHILE MEETING IS IN PROCESS POR FAVOR DE APAGAR SUS TELEFONOS CELULARES Y BEEPERS DURANTE LA JUNTA PUBLIC COMMENTS The public is encouraged to address the City Council or any of its Agencies listed on this agenda on any matter posted on the agenda or on any other matter within its jurisdiction. If you wish to address the City Council or any of its Agencies, you may do so during the PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS period noted on the agenda. Each person is allowed three (3) minutes speaking time. A Spanish speaking interpreter is available for your convenience. COMENTARIOS DEL PUBLICO Se invita al publico a dirigirse al Concilio o cualquiera otra de sus Agencias nombradas en esta agenda, para hablar sobre cualquier asunto publicado en la agenda o cualquier tema que este bajo su jurisdiccion. Si usted desea la oportunidad de dirigirse al Concilio o alguna de sus Agencias, podra hacerlo durante el perfodo de Comentarios del Publico (Public Communications) anunciado en la agenda. A cada persona se le permite hablar por tres (3) minutos. Hay un interprete para su conveniencia. ae€ on'. P flab° to, c r� 3( eisda itel`F.. rO 'sia 'n.,x ` "P sessk-,) t o <a J, ,:' r —, ",CF tr less than 72 hour ,,.3 tL'°s Ms! F;Yef air t wi.17 ~-,at JE �r'_�a �"��3�5,;, f. ";' ;fie f.� ?. r:,,,,W (r% `:ra'J'; a'�.,,ly ..,lei­ rF -sr „, rax.P..' ;i.,� i ,.�?U� a._, r ::a'.,.t ,�,. ` s: r'rw, p1.,a( +?, F�', da ..,.� ..N, S ;; )..,r 1 "717A CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING — 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL Council Members: Monica Garcia, Ricardo Pacheco, Susan Rubio, Mayor Pro Tem Cruz Baca and Mayor Manuel Lozano ANNOUNCEMENTS This is to announce, as required by Government Code section 54954.3, members of the City Council are also members of the Board of Directors of the Housing Authority and Finance Authority, which are concurrently convening with the City Council this evening and each Council Member is paid an additional stipend of $30 for attending the Housing Authority meeting and $50 for attending the Finance Authority meeting. PROCLAMATIONS, COMMENDATIONS & PRESENTATIONS Presentation of Certificate of Recognition to Rosie Breceda, retiring owner of Pen Mar Beauty Salon, in recognition of her 35 years as a successful business owner in Baldwin Park. Presentation of Certificate of Recognition to Soledad Tovar Cruz, in recognition of her accomplishments as a successful author and poet, and recipient of an International Certificate of Participation in Art and Literature for Poetry. Presentation of Certificates of Recognition to the Baldwin Park Youth Soccer League in recognition of their victory at the AC Brea Thanksgiving Invitational 2014 Championship. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Three (3) minute speaking time limit Tres (3) minutos sera el limite para hablar THIS IS THE TIME SET ASIDE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL PLEASE NOTIFY THE CITY CLERK IF YOU REQUIRE THE SERVICES OF AN INTERPRETER No action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances exist. The legislative body or its staff may: 1) Briefly respond to statements made or questions asked by persons; or 2) Direct staff to investigate and /or schedule matters for consideration at a future meeting. (Government Code §54954.21 ESTE ES EL PERIODO DESIGNADO PARA D/RIGIRSE AL CONCILIO FAVOR DE NOTIFICAR A LA SECRETARIA SI REQUIERE LOS SERVICIOS DEL INTERPRETS No se podra tome accion en a1g0n asunto a menos que sea incluido en la agenda, o a menos que exista alg(Ina emergencia o circunstancia especial. El cuerpo legislativo y su personal podran: 1) Responder brevemente a declaraciones o preguntas hechas por personas; o 2) Dirigir personal a investigar y/o fijar asuntos para tomar en consideracion en juntas proximas. [Codigo de Gobierno §54954.2] City Council Agenda Page 2 REPORTS OF OFFICERS 1. APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -049, ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, CALIFORNIA, APPOINTING REPRESENTATIVES AND ALTERNATES AS OFFICIAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE CITY," AND FOLLOWING REVIEW AND APPOINTMENT OF MEMBERS TO ESTABLISHED COMMITTEES, ADOPT SAID RESOLUTION. Staff recommends that Council 1) review and appoint members to the positions of representatives and alternates of the established committees and organizations presented in Resolution No. 2015 -049, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, CALIFORNIA, APPOINTING REPRESENTATIVES AND ALTERNATES AS OFFICIAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE CITY;" and 2) review in -house committee appointments and select or nominate members as representatives of these committees accordingly, noting that, for those committees which provide any stipends, members nominated for such committees must abstain from that vote. CONSENT CALENDAR All items listed are considered to be routine business by the City Council and will be approved with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a City Councilmember so requests, in which case, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. 2. WARRANTS AND DEMANDS Staff recommends that Council ratify the attached Warrants and Demands Register. 3. TREASURER'S REPORT — NOVEMBER 2014 Staff recommends that Council receive and file the Treasurer's Report for the month of November 2014. 4. REJECTION OF CLAIMS Staff recommends that Council reject the following claim(s) and direct staff to send the appropriate notice of rejection to claimant(s): Abu Larshin Brothers, Inc. alleges that claimant was injured on City property 5. MEETING MINUTES Staff recommends that Council receive and file the following Meeting Minutes: A. Meeting Minutes of January 7, 2015, for the Special Meeting and Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council. 6. APPROVE AN AGREEMENT FOR STORM WATER POLLUTION COMPLIANCE INSPECTION SERVICES Staff recommends that Council approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement with Infrastructure Engineers to perform Storm Water Pollution Compliance Inspections on behalf of the City of Baldwin Park, and authorize the Director of Finance to make appropriate transfers and fund adjustments. City Council Agenda Page 3 7. APPROVE A 3 -PARTY AGREEMENT BETWEEN FITNESS INTERNATIONAL, LLC, MIG /HOGLE- IRELAND, INC., AND THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK FOR CEQA AND PLANNING RELATED SERVICES FOR A PROPOSED 45,000 S.F. L.A. FITNESS AND 9,000 S.F. RETAIL /RESTAURANT BUILDING AT 13822- 13916 GARVEY AVENUE (OVAL SITE). Staff recommends that Council approve the 3 -Party Agreement and authorize the Mayor to sign the Agreement between Fitness International, LLC, MIG /Hogle- Ireland, Inc., and the City of Baldwin Park. 8. AUTHORIZE THE PUBLICATION OF THE NOTICE OF INVITATION TO BID FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND TWO INTERSECTIONS. Staff recommends that Council: 1. Adopt the plans and specifications for the construction of traffic signals at the intersection of Los Angeles Street and La Rica Avenue, and at the interserrtinn of Balriiwin Park Boulevard and Ohio Street; and 2. Authorize the publication of the Notice of Invitation to Bid for the construction of traffic signals at two intersections, identified as the intersection of Los Angeles Street and La Rica Avenue, and at the intersection of Baldwin Park Boulevard and Ohio Street. 9. APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -050, ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUND - WALNUT CREEK NATURE PARK PROJECT." Staff recommends that Council approve and adopt Resolution No. 2015 -050, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUND - WALNUT CREEK NATURE PARK PROJECT;" and Authorize the Director of Recreation and Community Services to execute any further documents. APPROVE AUTHORIZE OF DEHUMIDIFIER FOR THE POOL AT MORGAN PARK Staff recommends that Council authorize the purchase of a dehumidifier through Honeywell, Inc., for $127,404.20, plus applicable tax, and authorize the Director of Finance to make appropriate transfers and fund adjustments. 11. APPROVE PUBLIC WORKS REORGANIZATION. Staff recommends that Council: 1. Approve the implementation of the proposed reorganization; and 2. Approve the attached job specifications for the positions of Engineering Manager, Public Works Supervisor, and Management Assistant; and 3. Approve the salary ranges of the proposed positions as follows: a. Engineering Manager: $6,428 - $8,614 monthly. b. Public Works Supervisor: $4,243 - $5,686 monthly. c. Management Assistant: $3,659 - $4,904 monthly. City Council Agenda Page 4 12. APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH LA CANADA DESIGN GROUP FOR THE CIVIC PLAZA DESIGN. Staff recommends that Council approve Amendment No. 1 to the professional services agreement with La Canada Design Group for the preparation of construction plans and specifications for the Civic Plaza design, and authorize the Director of Finance to make appropriate transfers and fund adjustments.. 13. RATIFY THE RETENTION OF ATTORNEY SERVICES. Staff recommends that Council ratify the retention of the listed law firms and add the firms to the City's panel of legal firms upon execution of retainer agreements to be approved as to form by the City Attorney ana executed by the iviayor. 14. AUTHORIZE RETURN OF $3,473,836 OF LOAN REPAYMENTS TO THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF A CITY LOAN IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE STATE CONTROLLER'S OFFICE REPORT AND REQUEST THE OVERSIGHT BOARD APPROVE INCLUDING THE REPAYMENT OF THE CITY LOAND IN ROPS 15/15A. Staff recommends: 1. That Council authorize the return of $3,473,836 to the Successor Agency that was originally paid to the City in repayment of various loans for administrative costs incurred by the Community Development Commission with $2,866,910 from Fund 200 and $606,926 from the Assigned General Fund Reserve; 2. That the outstanding balance of the City's Loan as set out in the City Loan Agreement with the Successor Agency be adjusted to reflect the return of the $3,473,836 to the Successor Agency and adjusted to $21,901,790; and 3. The City request that the Oversight Board approve including returned loan repayment in the Successor Agency's next ROPS; and 4. That the Director of Finance be authorized to make all necessary budget amendments, changes in loan balances and transfers. City Council Agenda See related Successor Agency Agenda Item, below, on Consent Calendar Page 5 PUBLIC HEARING 15. A REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND A SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT TO SPECIFIC PLAN 06 -01 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 51- UNIT SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED GATED CONDOMINIUM PROJECT INCLUDING THE RELOCATION OF TWO WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES WITHIN THE R -1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 1) AND MU -2 (MIXED -USE 2) ZONES. ADDITIONALLY, THE PROJECT INCLUDES A REQUEST FOR A ZONE CHANGE TO APPLY THE SPECIFIC PLAN OVERLAY TO ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 8552 - 017 -004. A RELATED REQUEST IS FOR A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO CONSOLIDATE TWELVE (12) LOTS, OR PORTIONS THEREOF, INTO ONE (1) LOT OF LAND FOR A 51- DWELLING UNIT RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION AND ONE (1) LOT OF LAND FOR A WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY WITHIN THE SAME ZONING DESIGNATIONS. LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BALDWIN PARK BOULEVARD AND MERCED AVENUE (LOCATION: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS: 8550 - 017 -004, 8552- 017 -068, 069, 070, 071, 072, 073, 074, 075, 076, 077 AND 078); APPLICANT: KILL INVESTMENTS, LLC; CASE NUMBERS: Z -554, SP 14 -01 AND TM- 72195. Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council open the public hearing and, following the public hearing, that Council: 1. Approve and adopt Resolution No. 2015 -047, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR A ZONE CHANGE TO APPLY THE SPECIFIC PLAN (SP) OVERLAY TO ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 8552- 017 -004, A SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT TO AN EXISTING SPECIFIC PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 51 UNIT SINGLE - FAMILY DETACHED GATED CONDOMINIUM PROJECT INCLUDING THE RELOCATION OF TWO WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES, AND A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO CONSOLIDATE TWELVE LOTS OR PORTIONS THEREOF INTO LONE LOT OF LAND FOR A FIFTY -ONE DETACHED RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNIT CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION AND ONE LOT OF LAND FOR A WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY WITHIN THE R -1, (SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) AND MU -2 (MIXED USE 2) ZONES. (LOCATION: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS: 8552 - 017 -004, 8552 - 017 -068, 069, 070, 071, 072, 073, 074, 075, 076, 077, AND 078; APPLICANT: KILL INVESTMENTS, LLC; CASE NUMBERS: Z -554, SP 14 -01 AND TM- 72195)" City Council Agenda Page 6 2. Conduct a first reading, by title only, and waive further reading to introduce Ordinance 1368, "AN ORDINANCE OF CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ADOPTING THE FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING A ZONE CHANGE ADDING THE SPECIFIC PLAN (SP) OVERLAY TO THE PROPERTY IDENTIFIED WITH ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 8552- 017 - 004;" and 3. approve and adopt Resolution No. 2015 -048, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ADOPTING THE FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING A SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO CONSOLIDATE TWELVE LOTS OR PORTIONS THEREOF INTO NO MORE THAN TWO LOTS FOR A DETACHED FIFTY -ONE DWELLING UNIT RESIDNTIAL CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY WITHIN THE R -1 (SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) AND MU -2 (MIXED USE 2) ZONES (LOCATION: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS: 8552 - 017 -004, 8552 - 017 -068, 069, 070, 071, 072, 073, 074, 075, 076, 077, AND 078; APPLICANT: KLL INVESTMENTS, LLC; CASE NUMBERS: Z -554, SP 14 -01 AND TM- 72195)." CITY COUNCIL ACTING AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION CONSENT CALENDAR 1. CONFIRM THE RECEIPT BY THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF $3,473,836 FROM THE CITY ASSOCIATED WITH REVERSAL OF REPAYMENTS OF A CITY LOAN IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE STATE CONTROLLER'S OFFICE REPORT AND REQUEST THE OVERSIGHT BOARD APPROVE THE REPAYMENT OF THE CITY LOAN ON ROPS 15/16A. Staff recommends: 1. That the Board of the Successor Agency confirm the receipt of $3,473,836 that was originally paid to the City in repayment of various loans for administrative costs incurred by the Community Development Commission; and 2. That the Successor Agency's outstanding obligation under the City Loan Agreement reflect an adjustment of $3,473,836 such that the total outstanding obligation on the City Loan be equal to $21,901,790; and 3. The Successor Agency requests that the Oversight Board approve including the reversed repayment of the City Loan in the Successor Agency's next BOPS; and 4. That the City's Director of Finance be authorized to make all necessary budget amendments, changes in loan balances and transfers. See related City Council Agenda Item, above, on the Consent Calendar City Council Agenda Page 7 CITY COUNCIL / CITY CLERK / CITY TREASURER / STAFF REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATION 1, Alejandra Avila, City Merl; rraf the City of Rald�ntin mark hereby ramify ±ha± I nrjler penalty reef perjury under the laws of the State of California, the foregoing agenda was posted on the City Hall bulletin board not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting. Dated this 15" day of January, 2015. F.R , Alejandra Avila uav uierK PLEASE NOTE: Copies of staff reports and supporting documentation pertaining to each item on this agenda are available for public viewing and inspection at City Hall, 2 d Floor Lobby Area or at the Los Angeles County Public Library in the City of Baldwin Park. For further information regarding agenda items, please contact the office of the City Clerk at (626) 813 -5204 or via e-mail at rcabalieroAbaidwin park. com. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the Public Works Department or Risk Management at (626) 960 -4011. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable staff to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. (28 CFR 34.102.104 ADA TITLE II) City Council Agenda =9 §��R TO: Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: Shannon Yauchzee, Chief Executive Officer DATE: February 4, 201.5 SUBJECT: APPROVE AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2015- 049, ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, CALIFORNIA, APPOINTING REPRESENTATIVES AND ALTERNATES AS OFFICIAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE CITY;" AND REVIEW AND APPOINT MEMBERS TO ESTABLISHED COMMITTEES, AS APPROPRIATE SUMMARY This report is to request that City Council designate representatives and alternates as official representatives of the City and to review and appoint members to the established in -house committees. FISCAL IMPACT None by this action. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Council 1) review and appoint members to the positions of representatives and alternates of the established committees and organizations presented in Resolution No. 2015 -049, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, CALIFORNIA, APPOINTING REPRESENTATIVES AND ALTERNATES AS OFFICIAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE CITY;" and 2) review in -house committee appointments and select or nominate members as representatives of these committees accordingly, noting that, for those committees which provide any stipends, members nominated for such committees must abstain from that vote. LEGAL REVIEW The City Attorney has reviewed and approved this Resolution. BACKGROUND Each year, following the reorganization of the City Council, the Council is requested to designate members as representatives and alternates on certain committees and organizations. Additionally, in -house committee appointments are reviewed and appointments may be revised at Council's discretion. ATTACHMENT Resolution No. 2015 -049 Roster of In -House Committees RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -049 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, CALIFORNIA, APPOINTING REPRESENTATIVES AND ALTERNATES AS OFFICIAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE CITY The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park, California, does hereby resolve as follows: WHEREAS, it is the Council's desire to review and /or amend the existing appointments; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2014 -002 adopted February 5, 2014 and all other Resolutions inconsistent herewith are hereby repealed and rescinded. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby appoint the following persons as representative and alternate members of the San Gabriel Valley Water Association — Quarterly luncheon held on the 21d Wednesday of the month; various locations (MEMBERS RECEIVE A STIPEND — NO) Section 2. The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby appoint the following persons as representative and alternate members of the Los Angeles County Sanitation District Nos. 15 & 22 — 4T" Wednesday, 1:30 p.m., District Office (MEMBERS RECEIVE A STIPEND — YES) Existing Appointees New Appointees Representative: Councilmember Susan Rubio Alternate: Mayor Manuel Lozano Section 2. The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby appoint the following persons as representative and alternate members of the Los Angeles County Sanitation District Nos. 15 & 22 — 4T" Wednesday, 1:30 p.m., District Office (MEMBERS RECEIVE A STIPEND — YES) *Appointment of Mayor required by Sanitation District Section 3. The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby appoint the following persons as representative and alternate members of the League of California Cities — Los Angeles County Division — 1St Thursday, 7:00 p.m., Metropolitan Water District— Courtyard Cafe, 1St Floor (MEMBERS RECEIVE A STIPEND — NO) Existing Appointees New Appointees Representative: Wa or Manuel Lozano Alternate: Mayor Pro Tern Cruz Baca *Appointment of Mayor required by Sanitation District Section 3. The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby appoint the following persons as representative and alternate members of the League of California Cities — Los Angeles County Division — 1St Thursday, 7:00 p.m., Metropolitan Water District— Courtyard Cafe, 1St Floor (MEMBERS RECEIVE A STIPEND — NO) Existing Appointees New Appointees Representative: Mayor Pro Tern Cruz Baca Alternate: Councilmember Susan Rubio Resolution No. 2015-049 Page 2 Section 4. The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby appoint the following persons as representative and alternate members of the Civil Defense Area "D" Director's Meeting — 3d Thursday, Various times /locations (MEMBERS RECEIVE A STIPEND — NO) Section 5. The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby appoint the following persons as representative and alternate members of the Civil Defense Area "D" General RAf%r" '2rd Th t irorin i / 8:30 a.,rn., Glen Glendora.. (MEMBERS RECEIVE A STIPEND — NO) Existing Appointees New Appointees Representative: Chief Michael Taylor Alternate: Mayor Manuel Lozano Section 5. The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby appoint the following persons as representative and alternate members of the Civil Defense Area "D" General RAf%r" '2rd Th t irorin i / 8:30 a.,rn., Glen Glendora.. (MEMBERS RECEIVE A STIPEND — NO) Section 6. The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby appoint the following persons as representative and alternate members of the Independent Cities Association — 2nd Thursday of each month at various locations (MEMBERS RECEIVE A STIPEND — NO) Existing Appointees New Appointees Representative: counamember Monica Garcia Alternate: Chief Michael Taylor Section 6. The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby appoint the following persons as representative and alternate members of the Independent Cities Association — 2nd Thursday of each month at various locations (MEMBERS RECEIVE A STIPEND — NO) Section 7. The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby appoint the following persons as representative and alternate members of the Independent Cities Association Lease Finance Authority — As needed; various times /locations (MEMBERS RECEIVE A STIPEND — YES) Existing Appointees New Appointees Representative: Councilmember Ricardo Pacheco Alternate: Ma or Pro Tem Cruz Baca Section 7. The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby appoint the following persons as representative and alternate members of the Independent Cities Association Lease Finance Authority — As needed; various times /locations (MEMBERS RECEIVE A STIPEND — YES) Section 8. The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby appoint the following persons as representative and alternate members of the Los Angeles County — City Selection Committee — 1st Thursday of each month in conjunction with the League of California Cities meetings (MEMBERS RECEIVE A STIPEND — NO) Existing Appointees New Appointees Representative: Council Member Ricardo Pacheco Alternate: Chief Michael Taylor Section 8. The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby appoint the following persons as representative and alternate members of the Los Angeles County — City Selection Committee — 1st Thursday of each month in conjunction with the League of California Cities meetings (MEMBERS RECEIVE A STIPEND — NO) *Appointment of Mayor required by State Law Existing Appointees New Appointees Representative: *Ma or Manuel Lozano Alternate: Council Member Susan Rubio *Appointment of Mayor required by State Law Resolution No. 2015 -049 Page 3 Section 9. The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby appoint the following persons as representative and alternate members of the Southern California Association of Governments — 1Sf Thursday of the month @ 9 am; Headquarters (MEMBERS RECEIVE A STIPEND — NO) Section 10. The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby appoint the following persons as representative and alternate members of the Foothill Transit Zone — °✓luster meetings head Quarteryy° at the West Covina Headqua;te,� Execute �oaed Room (MEMBERS RECEIVE A STIPEND — YES) Existing Appointees New Appointees Representative: Mayor Pro Tern Cruz Baca Alternate: Councilmember Susan Rubio Section 10. The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby appoint the following persons as representative and alternate members of the Foothill Transit Zone — °✓luster meetings head Quarteryy° at the West Covina Headqua;te,� Execute �oaed Room (MEMBERS RECEIVE A STIPEND — YES) Section 11. The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby appoint the following persons as representative and alternate members of the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments — 3RD Thursday, 6:00 p.m., various locations (MEMBERS RECEIVE A STIPEND — YES) Existing Appointees New Appointees Representative: Mayor Pro Tern Cruz Baca Alternate: Councilmember Susan Rubio Section 11. The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby appoint the following persons as representative and alternate members of the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments — 3RD Thursday, 6:00 p.m., various locations (MEMBERS RECEIVE A STIPEND — YES) Section 12. The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby appoint the following persons as its representative, alternate and substitute alternate representative to the Governing Board of the Independent Cities Risk Management Authority (ICRMA) — 21 d Wednesday, bi- monthly at various locations (MEMBERS RECEIVE A STIPEND — NO) Existing Appointees New Appointees Representative: Councilmember Susan Rubio Alternate: Ma or Pro Tern Cruz Baca Section 12. The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby appoint the following persons as its representative, alternate and substitute alternate representative to the Governing Board of the Independent Cities Risk Management Authority (ICRMA) — 21 d Wednesday, bi- monthly at various locations (MEMBERS RECEIVE A STIPEND — NO) Section 13. The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby appoint the following persons as representative members of the San Gabriel Valley Economic Partnership — Quarterly on the 3rd Thursday @ 4:00 p.m., Headquarters (MEMBERS RECEIVE A STIPEND — NO) Existing Appointees New Appointees Representative: Councilmember Ricardo (Must be Elected Official) Pacheco Alternate: Mayor Manuel Lozano (May be staff member) Substitute Alternate: Human Resources Manager (May be staff member Shama Curian Section 13. The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby appoint the following persons as representative members of the San Gabriel Valley Economic Partnership — Quarterly on the 3rd Thursday @ 4:00 p.m., Headquarters (MEMBERS RECEIVE A STIPEND — NO) Existing Appointees New Appointees Representative: Councilmember Susan Rubio Representative: Mayor Pro Tern Cruz Baca Resolution No. 2015 -049 Page 4 Section 14. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and shall forward copies hereof to said committees and organizations. APPROVED and ADOPTED this 4th day of February, 2015. MANUEL LOZANO MAYOR ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ss. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK I, Alejandra Avila, City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly approved and adopted the City of Baldwin Park at a regular meeting held February 4, 2015 of the Council: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: ALEJANDRA AVILA CITY CLERK hereby certify that the by the City Council of by the following vote Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council x Craig A. Graves, Director of Finance SUMMARY . Attached is the Warrants and Demands Register for the City of Baldwin Park to be ratified by the City Council. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council ratify the attached Warrants and Demands Register. FISCAL IMPACT The payroll for the last period was $364,165.86 and the attached General Warrants Register were $815,941.30 for a total amount of $1,180,107.16. LEGAL REVIEW None Required BACKGROUND The attached Claims and Demands report format meets the required information as set out in the California Government Code. Staff has reviewed the requests for expenditures for the appropriate budgetary approval and for the authorization from the department head or its designee. Pursuant to Section 37208 of the California Government Code, the Chief Executive Officer or their designee does hereby certify to the accuracy of the demands hereinafter referred Payments released since the previous City Council meeting and the following is a summary of the payment released: Warrants and Demands Page 2 1. The payroll of the City of Baldwin Park consisting of check numbers 196721 - 196753. Additionally, Automated Clearing House (ACH) Payroll deposits were made on behalf of City Employees from control number 238773 - 239022 for the period of November 09, 2014 through November 22, 2014 inclusive; these are presented and hereby ratified in the amount of $364,165.86. fl- I Z- General �v aimIlL iineluding check rlulriners GWG l�F t0 203369, in the total amount of $815,941.30 constituting of claims and demands against the City of Baldwin Park, are herewith presented to the City Council as required by law, and the same hereby ratified. Ca 1-D C", C) CD (D 10 1w w w W w W 110 (_0 tQ, tla h3 IT, -1 C", yJ C) ,fT, 1 0 hi (_n YEY ,_n S_n nj a,, W Ir- "-C, (r✓ cil v I- ray ID ID w CJ U'l tr'. -,I I-, "i "' F, 1.1J 1.1-7 4. n 4' �j 'r, r", �) S-" ,I 'n -III- F - "l w p ("I -,I cl al Qo _j (x cd cD -ja"D ul -.j (j, 'no". 'D , 41 -1 �p W C"a, W Owm w c?;D a, �� ED zD w 2 Fj I. x tl:i I.., i..., of N, NJ N) NJ N3 I ID c� C', C'D 'T. ul ill cl N, c', C— c� Cj Cl fti sD N� cD r',;, u Q, ul ? cD �j hJ I ID ,,, 0 CD 1, e-- C-1 1, c)— cD 1, rj 1 N I TQ I N,, tQ 1 N, E N" I hj I NO I N� N� (j, Ul U) ul Ul (j. ul c� 'o W 'D w ,z) w c) w c) UJ C, L. w 'o w C) C, C, <21 1� 2D u (D u� cD 2D �D C, cD -i5 %D "o t D c, 'D c, 'D :5 1 C'2 0 w I- w w C, 1) v 11 41 a- � a, a,- cl 4. C, al. (D c> - c> a-` 8 2, 1 ID I-D cl lz> C, �D Ul �x ��n r"i lon ZD cl cD , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 T i i I ,-� c', 1-11 Ol t", -v, to w W, Go �,,D W a, 7 W U, w w C, E-- �nl ID tD m, c I- I-- f- �- H r c) c) lo S - c) al H H x ID 1� ID C, 'D Cj -j w to Nl� w w (ji ­j a, o Ln w 1,� al Yom, va R h,j N) Cl) R N� ro cD I c, I �,j j "I- 0 "D 0 cD �_n ID cD ID, L o �,- CJ w CD U, vr- "-f, � ult, C.3 V, Ul w -�n 01 tl� (-fl 110 (P uo u 0 kf, cl In 0 11 11 In rl 1:1 A� A 111 .1 117) (1 1Dl CD 00 I ID I �D C� C) 10 C> CD I-) C) <D C) C, CD ul u c> 0 Q, 1,.J C) ID "S L� C, C, 'D 'D - 0 cl, cl o c3 cD Q cl ci) cr �D (D C7 cl cl 0 C� lo cl I'D c� C) c) -� cD cl I > cl 1 11 c"S 0 C, al o c c) �D �D cD 1 Cl 0 C C-1 0 I I'D C) c� CD cl ro cl D ( z) c> cl c> I-D C, (D C) cl �c - -.) -D > ri I- (Ij W, X, CFj �1 rj,�j li 'cl ,,I c, rGi .� m r1l ftl ill 121 N-) NJ rQ N� rl_l fl) Fl� 11") r1l) 0 c) o 0 ir, rm 0 �; a) `1 7j a, 1�1 cl, "To Ill 0 'Tl m , o lt� - M Lo C) I'll "I ftl t4 m 'A M M M kl M. MP W� m m m CA �11 t, m m 0 I-) 0 w w co Or, ro Ll LM r-1 r1i rj m Nj r IIJ 0 N-, to H �,j I I I (74 c� 4 r") Cl UO �D G3 ^J TIO lV 11-1 N, m llj Vj r" r,,o ro m -, mi v,J ET r j �,j �4 H, 'I ID cD cl _1 'AY Ca ryw M X1 0 1W tM t1l li �,j IC I �"xl , - ul I-, - I-, 1-3 EZ, m 1-4 H 0 ci o l Fl ,1 ,1 "1 0 x a,- C, Uj Ul 411, 41 rj FQ a- X a, 0 0 0 a 0 CR '.o ;Xlj -Z )J Pl ✓'Tl M IT 11" 11P f, T� r 3 rl L, - N P4 I, po P, P, ,ix]", H m N (-, b H9 It, ,i rlj C, 0 0 P� P� rD �a ;� 0 rl7 ;� IV 10 M ff, '.3 3 W t-A m .rxj 1-3 C:YI tit 1,0 w U� U, U) flO 10 '.3 C, c) ID C) ID ID ID -4. �pl N3 N, k- �- F, '.., rl} hi ID It, 03 N" m co oN c"', 41 w Nj (j, I (-P W o) Cl ,n ED -n --I I'D W kD 41 '-0 1 m -3 --j U, I'D VA I- W I 1-0 ry a,- t.,a 1-1 r-j M Qn I'll Id cJ I'D C> t", (.n -4= a, X., 4, C.-I 4D Cl CD C.) C9 C) Cll Q 1: W LO Ull 11 Ij ",I ha i,J rl�l IN xSa IT, .Cu W Q ID .C4 4, ID CD r,Ji Q OD tlo - qr. (,n 1-, 411-1 1� S "j --I "i w w vl� "_n W G.) . - �, ID P" �, t 11*1 -, On , -j 1, ,"1 CID, � w ID -A � . "I �D 'D 'o :- (-, i� a- • �-, � " F,, ­. M . F- s-,, t'J fQ (Xx C> W, C* kc, al Ix -j C, -j --j 4n vI cr, 'n H w w 'D c> 'r, -,1 -3 w ("1 4'- C> Cr 0 W CQ "o IT, 01 L Y :-j K)! I tD F..x fl d t"✓ i a N.) Nd i 1 4-, 'p ro I I., i cj rl_l C-, cD C, C5 t,.1 Cl C-1 CD Q E ^ti7 N, NJ t"O 1Q CD 1,j to C, rIO Cn 6R1 X- Ul tV i C-n fD 41 .V, X-1 ID X, N) 'ji -- h., '-" -,., CD E -O N t...,. C., -, In tQ U Cp (,n I) I.., F -,_ m C', � I I I i € I � rQ r"y 'j, L, 'D J, ci, "JI "JI LY, lil U, ID �)l UP 19) Z. ID ol Cjl U, ID Ul V, Q, I U, Q" 4� Lil Cn 1-01 (D C, (D c 'D C� C, 10 C, ID,- 'D C? CD C-) CD CD CD Cl C, C-' c, c) C, -- I'll-, (fl U, (,P L 41- (1 1-11 1, 1, 1.11 1 11 "1 11 Q, ILP t'p Pp t, IS) ID 14, Irl 110 C> C, C> C> C, <D (D ID C, Z> ID cl, P£t ul ul Lq (p cn ",-n Ln Cp f"A CP (j, Ul U, n (I 1 11 11 a;p Ul 1, 1, M w w Lo ID 11 W W W U, w L" w w I., w 1w 11) W ol w w cl, k, w ID 1-1 c <j C) L'I ID L" c� CY c, C� (-n C, C� C, w CD 0 0 1� C- w �D C, cl- al 1-5-D C� C, C� I'D w I tit f_7 0 C> 0 0 �D C� C, CD C) C, DD CD, C-1 -j c ID C� C, CD 0 i fl 41 C) 10 D I-) C) C, 01 C, CP C't C kn iA (A C3 C-) CD Q 10 Cl (D ID Z) --A --I -1 C) <D W 10 C, C, ID C, C, C> ol ID C> Q Q ID --A ID all W C, 1_ :2, CY, 5-, C> r) C, oll Pli C, .D a, a, "J fz) 'T" C, CO C> --j C> C., Q, C, ID C, C., €D C', C-11 �p u C� ul C) ID C, C� ID �-p U c> C. V, --n NJ 'i C) NJ C� C, C> <D C� 41 VI TO rDa W 0 1" 1-0 Ili _rj C m u-i r I-U I'V Iz 'IV :rl 0 0 �t 'D C, M c) I-i C-1 H -4 fz> I 11 Irl "1 11 rl r�. rl r, Ua W m 0 U3 le'l H "J !A 1-3 H C, W H (I Ce ttl t* ' l Ui X m -12� M ul Ll t, m G -10 M M V >:� - 0 'v I", t� " , - �, � 2 1 x m n �o �t �j C) I C1 , ""0 CD 0 M DO -M 8 8 Ij i ll� ITJ I.-] I�j Ili U'l t2 FH ml it 1" M OIJ 8- C, 11-01 t7l, t7i m 2i dP �A C) 1 ol� m 0 c IMO r �r� VI CQ 0 P'l r.a 0, U) 1�1 U) - �ij H V, �Ll Z.j L�j LIA M Cj t 1,4 li G') Ij G', H 0 C,, r",3 ul m W �A 011 Pre W W vi m C'� �L C� 0 (-3 t 0 R, f ftl �11 91 �11 kll 0 M M "I R� I IIJ 10 ll�� C3 ILI naM "1 71 t, t, 51 Q 00 M m m m L-1 M -M E) En m c vi a vj R, n� Ts �111 �3 0 Cv, ul un 'j, (A N-� (n, n tP W 10 W ID C> 17, CD fIll rl� C-1 C', I.D N� K, UP C) IJ 'r, cl� cl 011 G�l 01, 0 (-- C, (.D H i— � F-- F� ul' m M il-I W -j NJ �D CD� <D C, <1 CZ 1,10 CP "; ,j N, t"I'l W m -- H C-1 C, \o 0,1 OD 4, to Cp -jD (fl Qn Cyi I'll i.-.. &, J., �D ,I w w Irl N3 tO fy, F'j 4a .-I C) '711 to 'I "J q'y N .,1 4, Nj (,jl W w m C-In ID W --I -j "A --j 1XI vj lyll w w C-1 CD (LI 4=, N� �,n w a, C) C, - Ul 41- all CD W C5 C) Q Ci: _V� 10 W _V11 W CO M 'f, W'D l',A Cw C" 110 C> C-1 a, V" a?I, d -A i," --J -<A. W t'� 4�' ('J W W u C" 4.17 CrWl ID 0 co 0 0 ul I Cir '.., J, X., 'R 1­1 a., 4t I I Jl. . 'r'l I I i'a K" i`0 ill-11 KJ i'll-11 f " K5 NO j.-., K) I 11_ I. h_) F .' 11111.1 I..w n' 't.' 11.1 'Pl 1 a 41 X., I C" C' CD .:� V, u ol as µa n 0 X. :_q ul al t� (D illj �D '� C) C' rD C" -Z K' 13 t", 1v K� ID C) Q I -, 1 X, i i`0 N'l Ill," NJ K) I I I J I IQ I I I ID 11 ", 1 (j: "JI w ulw I) x' U� V, (j, u, ul i_rl q_I+ ul Q, X4� cl1 ul �'D U, "_j' 6 6 'S C' c' 6 'S Z_ 'S c"'S 6, 66 6 6 66 — 6 c�" 6 ul (x 0 �y 'r, 0, U� ul k'fl (-n u u a� Ln a- (p ul �jl Ln vt' 6 o' �x "P w _j __j t2 ID 11P w 'D w w 4 4o ems. H Cr, C, C, Cl ID CD CD l 1 T11711 ol Ul f,p Ul 0 ul (), Qn (-n i.n kn (_P (fl u lFi 1, ul 11 w U) Q., "I w Ul W w 0 OJ 1-1 k. W W ID 41 'D w 'D 2, H 0 D C� ("n Cl ID C-1 C, C, r� In 11 C) 1171 ID Cr? CD In, CD n- (-DD '_j I '.S (D O'f C) Cl ID �D ID �D Cl �D C� �D '31 1,- 171, i! 4a1 ID ID CI C) C> C> cl, un 2 "_n (P �jl ID 1D. �'n (,P C, C) 41- C� CD cl 0 <D 'D C> S S C) Cl �� C, 0 CD 0 C� --J _n -3 -3 Cl �D -j CD CD Ix Cl Cl Cl C) C-1 ID C' Cl I-> 'D C_ C) C' C> C, W C> cl, C> C, C> tzCD � cl 1=1 C> C? CD C? ID C> U 10 C" C> C =x cZ) � IV I-- U) tt C) 0 a•~ 'il - t., C' o� U, L4 ­4 M "a 1A Fq lU I. '"o m 14 n C) m C10 ul 10 "P 0 r-" n "Ti H -Al oom CFJ r'o r1f) F­ Q __1 GO C, n o Fti Lj td u� w 0 IV r *F� r r 888888888 r GPs Prl 1.1-i �5 P-1 on 1p 1p 1p "I ­j ­1 11 4_' Wks c7J m cy, Lp Cn sSa 01 110 U., K 00 q) t_q qp Go Uj 171 (rd ul 00 m Ll -i A Pi i oll D4 -M n ri A rA 0 00" w WI ID W, _.j sfY w 'D N) U, spa tJ V-7 1qi ITI 10 0 0 (D "D r r I I H H I, I� C) C) irk n Z M LIA M' I� U) N U) �Yj 1�1__ ltl w W ,.I H C) (D C) <D C) CD __ ID ­_ H C. lJi Ul 'In o" 'p, In n U '_? i..."7' N. 00 (n" N' 15� I. I C2 kM 10:1 i 43 �z GO (IJ w QJ "'o 41 _V� 10 W _V11 W CO M 'f, W'D l',A Cw C" 110 C> C-1 a, V" a?I, d -A i," --J -<A. W t'� 4�' ('J W W u C" 4.17 CrWl ID 0 co 0 0 ul I Cir '.., J, X., 'R 1­1 a., 4t I I Jl. . 'r'l I I i'a K" i`0 ill-11 KJ i'll-11 f " K5 NO j.-., K) I 11_ I. h_) F .' 11111.1 I..w n' 't.' 11.1 'Pl 1 a 41 X., I C" C' CD .:� V, u ol as µa n 0 X. :_q ul al t� (D illj �D '� C) C' rD C" -Z K' 13 t", 1v K� ID C) Q I -, 1 X, i i`0 N'l Ill," NJ K) I I I J I IQ I I I ID 11 ", 1 (j: "JI w ulw I) x' U� V, (j, u, ul i_rl q_I+ ul Q, X4� cl1 ul �'D U, "_j' 6 6 'S C' c' 6 'S Z_ 'S c"'S 6, 66 6 6 66 — 6 c�" 6 ul (x 0 �y 'r, 0, U� ul k'fl (-n u u a� Ln a- (p ul �jl Ln vt' 6 o' �x "P w _j __j t2 ID 11P w 'D w w 4 4o ems. H Cr, C, C, Cl ID CD CD l 1 T11711 ol Ul f,p Ul 0 ul (), Qn (-n i.n kn (_P (fl u lFi 1, ul 11 w U) Q., "I w Ul W w 0 OJ 1-1 k. W W ID 41 'D w 'D 2, H 0 D C� ("n Cl ID C-1 C, C, r� In 11 C) 1171 ID Cr? CD In, CD n- (-DD '_j I '.S (D O'f C) Cl ID �D ID �D Cl �D C� �D '31 1,- 171, i! 4a1 ID ID CI C) C> C> cl, un 2 "_n (P �jl ID 1D. �'n (,P C, C) 41- C� CD cl 0 <D 'D C> S S C) Cl �� C, 0 CD 0 C� --J _n -3 -3 Cl �D -j CD CD Ix Cl Cl Cl C) C-1 ID C' Cl I-> 'D C_ C) C' C> C, W C> cl, C> C, C> tzCD � cl 1=1 C> C? CD C? ID C> U 10 C" C> C =x cZ) � IV I-- U) tt C) 0 a•~ 'il - t., C' o� U, L4 ­4 M "a 1A Fq lU I. '"o m 14 n C) m C10 ul 10 "P 0 r-" n "Ti H -Al oom CFJ r'o r1f) F­ Q __1 GO C, n o Fti Lj td u� w 0 IV r *F� r r 888888888 r GPs Prl 1.1-i �5 P-1 on 1p 1p 1p "I ­j ­1 11 4_' Wks c7J m cy, Lp Cn sSa 01 110 U., K 00 q) t_q qp Go Uj 171 (rd ul 00 m Ll -i A Pi i oll D4 -M n ri A rA 0 00" w WI ID W, _.j sfY w 'D N) U, spa tJ V-7 1qi ITI 10 0 0 (D "D r r I I H H I, I� C) C) irk n Z M LIA M' I� U) N U) �Yj 1�1__ ltl w W ,.I H C) (D C) <D C) CD __ ID ­_ H C. lJi Ul 'In o" 'p, In n U '_? i..."7' N. 00 (n" N' 15� I. I C2 kM 10:1 i 43 �z Cn C.-I 171 cl, CD ID C.) (D C., C, I..') C, C, Lo U'l W Lj S,,a U., W t,,,I W tlo rl� �1111) N3 ,-, tl� 1111�1 11) "1 ON LP, (,n Cat (.;n Cn 11-P C-11 Qn Ul Il_n .P-- C d53 ca "I Ifl J�l w Kal I'D 00 uJ Ol oj 0) rl V F.., 0, -j ol c, al cn u 'n, Ws,, ID V, "J It, _V, Ui Q'I Q fli 4, N3 10 �,J A, o ID i-n - r „D CV) rQ rll;l j, 's, I, r, Ln ”' r 'f w Ili -I I.-n 1.21, 2- --1 w 1XI �kl -1 --1 CID cl, 1:0 lul 'l- 1-11 i 'D lltil - Io oq r2, C, W .1-11 C, "C' P , C, NJ - .1-" .1y, C1 Cl ID C) I-- I- ID T,-a W W - t-1 4_o - r"'I ID - CD N) Cr r. kfl m -1 0 0 C) L� m C, �A "g, D J- m -j t- I'D 10 Ix �X-1 r. I., FO I Il,� 1-1�1 r,) I I tlo a., t.� i3O -, 1�i -, q, IJ N. ro I- C, N3 ', 4. , I I Nj I , J I �NQ I rl_l N I ul I j" €jl -I% U1 ut 1-0 CT, Ul ID (JI ID U, U I L" ILL 6, "JI "v C , 0 ID (D <� ""I - CD K-� Z) 11:1 1,, (D C) C, (J, Ln 4, i,r, 4� z, -> "I I'D ,r, Ln 17D Cil to I", L, C, C.n C1r ejt f.it cv, 0 ID C w w W W W 'D Ol 1- - H lw H C) a, w W (I ID H �� H , W <D Co W'D L" W , F- Na, W W tv C-1 fll:l 1' I w C C, cj Cl C W, C- C) J- ID C, 0 10 In --I C) w C� w ID w w m ID C.) C.J. flQ 4D 1 fJ • C, ID C57 fD C) ID 0 C, In I-, kr, C, C, C It 10 IZ, -1 o,_jI C.D --j 1 W I-- (-n C� I 0 11 C"} IL 1z, 0 11 J- "f C) C> U �_n 1� �) ID C) cl C) C) CD C, �D Ln fl-11 <D -1 C, "D Cr S C) C� "In 011 C� Q C, C) C, 0 - D C� CLI -j -1 Z) --j CZ) C, C> K, NJ Kn I C) D (D C> 0 C) -> I= In C) C-1 D C> 0 Cry C-) �711 rO �D Cl C> ID - C> Cl u C> C', C) C) C> I-P It- Na Fd ha tii N.) NJ N,) K, N) I'll." NO flo, 1�1 KII rlo r1l) '1', 111.11 1.1 1^1 �o (7) 110 a, Ga M co 'g 3 'A I�g g -d 'A .-3 G'A C, C- CD ul M [a1 4, C± t13 C 0 vi 11 NJ W Ua cla tj7 cl'� C) k4 M 1 U2 M 1.�l Z c, n n M 0 �"St U!, v F, n n `1 111 �l M 11 1;1 101 13 ll� T m 'T, U) •-1 0 C', I-0 1-3 tj r��j 1-3 3 0' 10 10 1-0 'A I el "I In tyj ml ITJ 171 1711 M �r W IW 4, 1-4 F --1 W 01 rl,' 1� E, 1 Ca M 11 14 "N' I,a 'JI u j V, -3 H C-1 W 0 7:3 z rj r;J 'o tIl ro r,7 � M z �J U, a, a, t, r,-,, n m 'XI O,v v t'l 0 "KI n n nI �ro m P Oj t� M Ld 1-4 11.1 rll9 < I.< 0 � PT, 0 1-3 H Cl C-1 (ri 1w 01 C. > ul, <1 Cil UJ W tl.r ll3 NJ M "J", Cn W na C, IV 1w I'D ('11 � IT, olt Il9 -11Y1 N) .,2W I , W 6x 0) a a, p I W Irl rA M ,.V, NJ 0i (fl w w 41 w 01 t C) (Yj Cn Ca 3 Cn 1 1 I .s <D h•,) C.:i 0. r.1 I) C, CD P..') C) r,:S ^. w C:9 t;? W w I'D W U i.:.5 tj t:a C'::.? C.:. { { ✓,7 N 3...t9 C.J to NJ G,t N) i.,j (+3 {..,.5 St"k I�..) rtr t' -,i r.J r>.) �) rlJ rti ry; t.) 1v «3 •-�-1 01: G3+, en, rl ll> £;Y�x Lv, CF•, �+� i 1 I l FW il;" I •`" T C� F f_n •w.1 � 111 'D tti CiP 4,P "UI }I -, 4i? €-,. - ir'r h-z .t: °s N .:� iri W C-) W.,� r") W-r' �-.7 H F"-` ra s t� N.`+ .J F-T {.2'I «F* (.S1 k-" F-«.. 3. hi P.-.* w-.t P..s }.....��'£ ly tra r. t I'.S CfJ r,.J 'n X- (C: rG k-C' «� J" N [,;P t-e. Ci > -.7 Cc'7 s, «H- CJ e_it . K) .. [_i . m C .. .. „1 • r...7 C�.... �.7 .. �;� . ICI . U�1 U�! . �a . 5='? 4i3 lJ f_7 i r� w OD CX? 1"1 i01 K) C. (m'” 41 CD K) ID C"' :F1 «C1 'M --3 -._,3 £) C= C ID Q, CS .S C_1 C• ry ID 'r! C::.) z.:.4 C, w I".+- t'..1 L.) i I .F< C<.:i C C) CIO -."1 C> C� C CC) «G C3 ? 1 CS I...x F. } x f..s. I._s. F I..s F._t }.. I...x ;.�. •pm M1. ; i I _x p_d } . ; _« ;... p F...: I..x �.._• F..> ) .x F._C I x I._z f� r I �. i-+ I r�� -.A P ^.�r ! �� (,,.."? ( b S y'Pj ...f C ! : f.W D C, r I� . % ^..,� C Ir.) Ca ux;4 f ii f.J ",� i ., La7 C, 10 C) 1� C) G,C) C"3 � + "y '� Vi=a cJ "e,. CD C"'3. "!^*, ID -- Cl �':a " ^*, �' °w. if'd sa a_, .fin 1 r, (.! ! ! I '�+a I 1 I C+s € #,za = ? r.,!"J I tsg 1 C+.x C. 4eJ C:+ E w I I C ..,} f .? CJ "1 i=Y ( 1 1. 4' -C°' I`s:! 'cw Il- �.? i:_.r ! " '0 i It C_] N C� l„"eq CD t'? C, 0 0 i!J C) C'J (1- t.:y rC7 C'S {_ft r,,;ft (.fl f.i 1 1 .., 'r..._ C ±� `. -.:, r w_ �, � "..,.. Ca '�... Cl � C "` -,.. C, C:. C• t:} C ;` •..'. V i 1 }-r € 14'� 1 tr-' 1 1 i-° I If, I I--+ ' t--« I „t C)C.? CD .G� CD Cam+ E:;? ;C4 r..a «rte k= �i-` C' C7 .L` {�P .C� 1`� •1`..� rz} .[:%+ C7 .C� C+ .I': ra .fio C:�? Cl � C� .G 4.P ? Jt LFI (X! C„> CD u"> r.� :- C.? 1-= C, tiD C) �: }-= 4:i !M) C . r) o-D cls _.? C} CC? ,m? t. �5 e�� �-:, ,:.'> ',.a` � C,5 � en T- cam,. C; c .'-! .' ; .' ;• • I I ? - �� I i �jl I I �� c l (" i,FI `, a C +;) ik•J t �:r r4; f.i1 iP I.:a r,5 t:n i'.,.`1 r,J'I (1,5 P.,1 l.P f +:) h,:1 '.,,.i i;.Jt q.dl i.ii U3 i x:', M 'A F-C F-z k-' E-' ! Sai L!d Fx 1 F-' F-" F r •-" c'>vi CC+ rY) t33 I C 2 K r .1 0 v:3 7.? . ? C -, C3 I fl C15 B�-' H� to ra «1 4.z! t J .a. e... t..iz U) r,, U, h.) GO {.a� ryi Fri rte. P.s K� c'S ID 1-•x i--t F_z ] :� i r, —1 r� t - -* Ul C7 Ct I a { g) l.,C} 4` w U1 - . 7 CD x,1 I3 C-1 r. 1 0, ¢1 9 --1 N) :_jt f ] E._x i r.) F..a ID t} C c 3 w,'•v tS) Cri -.] tS*< E ! V (..t taH+ ;...z t..;2 CO C1'J L""5. C: r_a "+ U °a t•,.? _„t P.J t:.�. `w' r-: yn h3 J3 V G„J c„:1:. Cy ;.y) if'+ CI i i�' °+ Cw C .J CJ C3 :.'7 C� c ...' C . > Cs t� +`✓_. C3 C+ :_s °.:7 CC.k 'D I'D C"? C C:,> Cl `_) CJ C1 U1 Clt y, nt C:) J C ,r r.C, C. C s C> CD C C r.D C.• C;„: (:C? 4:;> C? C, Cy) CC? C} CD C.r,, C1:! m C"} U C? C_t Cl :, C_) C., Cm, C> C• Cl, C�> C;) C7 C7 C._'? C. C°) C3 Cm1 C,., � C) n C 3 C { C�e"l.. C Cs C:? C:.} (,.:• Cl t,7 C" r_7 C? CC> C;'} Ut t Tt 451 imi? z t a +'CH .:7 tC7 :T' C.,"! C7 k-I t3.� t H 5 ;:"} Y LA r, 'tl ?'�.r rV r,r r-� r..1 rtii ',:1 F-- r"a s_; ':sH tt:, :i C =1 Y--? c C, p.J cam .try ' -:F f) r,'1 HH c , IQ "o hl? N, I'l, n fi t E 7 To Cam, r•, C r"v r*J 4i1 c.;n „.n ;! tj :' H rS; S7 !'Y? !; H ti ,t" ) '�,7 f C f..Y CH f..). "xH f e } CS1 C:7 ES} M,--A [U ;', ? C='S Y_> t...; i-a L:• H ,t Fi s G.+1 ,z? ++;; M ? CS 4i. "7.7 M. s...H tT1 I-.H3 M M L: %i t�; ? sJ z.r.1 C3 Ca C-+ t'" I t H "+3 " c,� g -a ati;- rn M t=i C:i �,z r7 ri C�.: "U :'S "i *�; ? I i ON a'O ?Z} r3_f M ;F.) *1J h'F M `�i H ae tt? :i" f"j M„i tY'" E N - -: '� f ; C3 1 �7r j' I� :X� • ?..:9 C F� �'' hi ✓: r"d tti ra S Cv 0 f,,.X` 1 4r.. YTJ rA7 `'' •'C :: ,`�> ,�i 1 E J .-� C) �..:.. GXI UI r,.X? dy t C) !'t� k-- C° � ;1c? !'� C :f ,_<, w7 K 1 I Ci i U t. 3 4i U 1 I,-, P^-3 h w 1 -H �'? C-v- Ci C -3 4,51 N C >'1 i"a I;,1a I ..z 1:C] h3 C +'i I:, N - "�-- H E=i G��7 [?} rn i=.H �'<", t=:1 Q I , <". .?�• .r_..r r� � � tra th %a k.-i 'z� h? C t`! C7 I iva C7j Ca C) C2 -4 rA Cj w•i ?-i zra >... Y ? E1.'i �. I?� t.r � 3 4-I Cx1 t?l t -1 M `9 f�• F - i .'"..'� F_.€ ' I_.x +4 « .�z r•tii r f I..a 4^l iW i F -I k.,r to i r'2 In N1 -tj CID x G t7 x a t-° - � Fes' t"•,5 ? a 7 raj i m I I I I ' I ! G? i i ! ! 1 I iS I I f 3 Ex7 4 H 1 �J 4> t, n Y.a 4...e r., F -, ! -` h , E.J [ �' p..z 4..s p .: p...a �.J P"wr Ytd >,,y [.J k...x ;; -n p...: I...x 4...s 1 C) C-1 �: f'.:? Cl „,? C� I- c-.a (D C"J {-<' C3 R� C:::J n i::S G,1 C: r Ga a 111) Go ko rsa 1.11 Gel � i3_::, t-dt aS'a :� J °s 1 � C.,?' ^� -� t� " ",,,, N, k•.3 N) i »:, Pv ^,,7 NJ S'' J CnJ I CO Cii 11 S_) -� Y1} of C.J 0 t_i C7 '`l U "' s r,",i '1 }l C3, } Y \E C;y C� CD 'lS1 4�-? C, e. . -., c_> ",.... '^,r l. i..3 . ^ _ ;'A D '. __ *„� ID C" K_ ) C" � �.. ° C..3 cD `�.. C::7 "xr C_ R `:.. n i_.: h p-^ 4 € rtti 4� 4-* Co i...a {„ :•.j N .. ".a Cs:% N �"=. (Jl .y :"`'� •i= r✓ Cl "a C:? c=a :C:r. Cl Cl F..t a.,r C"+\ mil tj• �* i-,. t-+ r 4-a -..1 CCi r(:a Cx1 .C+ «ice �� 1._x Cv Y\:t [ r 4.a j...a .{... f' "[ v 1 ,.bl I...x>,rvz � }.a q... p i i .r. i r. f„n F-a• .:.� ✓-` r3`.i 4...0 4CR �'� °� K) - -7 m (;.J S31 I--= (J 15 "1, �-1 -A f_n CP Cn 4D 4-'A E--` E F W 4,+3 W S.,Y (tit C,,, I°, kl- l Uj Ctil "t.: CY f'it (71 U? oll , -1 .j w (� ! J '! C? rQ Y' +.! 1--; 0 °-.f 40 W, C7 C i 7 Uri CJ fat f';:+ CL' - 4.G, ct`y l".:? C? • H.:. •. (11 • 4D C., CD C) C'. •. zg} ` c' .Cw 13 .L «F':..F::.. %.XI = E1? ,.5"1 ' (-? • !.i'I • . . U 1> C:t 4XY C-1 Cl c N I r,.J1 10 GD CD C_i C) C, C'_> ,i"s i9'« C. CD ID C~ C_7 C) [_s Cl Ur 17 all CD Gtr u .D eS"- L" IQ Pv Y � C3 C') C:) w C (1), .f': ,C.: f„rf �.... R=7 1 'El I I I I ' I ! G? i i ! ! 1 I iS I I f 3 Ex7 4 H fa7 M m 1 .R:: 141 F..x 4> t, n Y.a 4...e r., F -, ! -` h , E.J [ �' p..z 4..s p .: p...a �.J P"wr Ytd >,,y [.J k...x ;; -n p...: I...x 4...s 1 ;..t C` �: v €.J w"* 4Fa f' .: C4 NJ aD fUl 1 -, 4r-a -+-'+ W Y \. C, ID C. t' C: r SJ CWa i'•y+ CJ C_) CJ C.;:J z! c"r fa'1 4J " "^-u. � i3_::, t-dt aS'a :� J °s 1 � C.,?' ^� -� t� " ",,,, ZW, Ca ^ C5 ID CS CJ " °.., I G+1 [ L1 Y..;t CnJ I 11 S_) -� Y1} of C.J 0 t_i C7 '`l U "' s r,",i '1 }l C3, } Y \E C;y C� CD 'lS1 4�-? C, e. . -., c_> ",.... '^,r l. i..3 . ^ _ ;'A D '. __ *„� ID C" K_ ) C" � �.. ° C..3 cD `�.. C::7 "xr C_ R `:.. n i_.: h p-^ 4 € .C:^:= >F.. �"=. %;n :"`'� •i= r✓ Cl "a C:? c=a :C:r. Cl Cl u`, C"+\ mil tj• �* i-,. t-+ r 4-a Cl 1-z . C:+ .a C t cC 'D g ;-. c-x F-a• .:.� ✓-` ...5 - '...?' l C, �! � C) (� ! J ul to Cn in I-- Cn Gn C3 P.7 U, 01 Ln L.n i1Y f„n Ul W i l w C3 P,7 W.J h-" G,1 41 t-+ t-* N {-' E--� F-` C'1 Y °,5 C3 (.ti A K ,.l W tai F CP f-n t-' h~' W N' F-x !-` !-" F-` k-s r Gtr t GJ C, C, Y � C -+ � b ..,. f.n .0 I. 1 I...x („ {} S.a � Go b ", W .f': ,C.: f„rf C"s CU C."') cD !:'.^i C Cl ,',"? I...x [4. J C_"J lfJ C..J 1` a ��...d K) F.:J •....7 r_r. 511 C? {_'S i...x ��J €_3 I- }-, w SW Y�j C:) s n 4D F,:.. Q pl � 4.:1 C� C7 GIs G:.. L CJ C'u"J C_„t L"C w„i IYJ saw h-, F -.e C3 Q '3°, "C' C c a I-„ 1 cv CE f [ 11 C.,y C.., r, Y. �:. 6 ! ?:rn 6 ( 4= 1-' } -: 1-a E✓ (= � f Ian p-x per, t c. --' C l .'I Cl V C3 [J 10 C,;; [ 4-, C? ,.7 Cm [1 5.,y .: (`...�:� G,7 0�+y� CC ['.r� C 4T? M-+' 4-+ I..a 4-= p,, ;- -a' .t` .4:s ,� 4Y=� S ' -� 0 r„.,. G'R} t-a. f-a• C:t C) � C, x_? [a a..R C_ � [> C_ C� 0 C, i � ! Y♦a is 7 o r'7. C 5 C: Cz s� C+ 0 cn %; tXi'n Ca C) 0 � C U O 0 C! Cl C'? � Cz C, c.3 C, N" C=1 c..? Cs � t3 C Cf . CH 13 �D C.7 ='J C;D 4n C3 CD CJ C? C3 C, C i I i 1 t t I 1 E P f E 1 1 1 P a h} P -:7 E-` t-C P ^e i F:a F >3 P +,e 3� . > P,a Z � trd 1?j i ',RJ Pq'r 4� f LY 1 1ti �5 ;r1 17.i „.CJ -trI FJ %.k y re-- Q [ €Y Y_1 � f q S4 Y 11 Ln � ii cn i Cad i3 i{7 "CT3 tI1 Y"i ??; Fr' ( f"1 t`f ?."`, :ty C., .71 =C� ,.G .' H k-t - 4-.4 r-t k ' , C-+ •. k73 I,Cf [S7 ' i C 7 *,. 71 1 f P;,i C✓ ;1.� t-' i:? i?� t?t C9 F -1 .tea ;ai kYJ ira• ��;a C! $J t N».v '& 'T3 r"5 M '�. G �Ci J;5 I"R 'i3 M 0 . r'3 C - i lU C .. y cl ,l Cox nJ ^- � m C.' M 3-i T F: `?` �.,. «C-, f) l.Tl F?7 Fz3 F a F-3 �o m Q lu r --3 H L:7 IV C f',,,1 171 ;c-+ . ^„ DO I H w f"r5 I .'"°v,,, Cl f 9 C1 C7 iY -f K C-+ C=J 'C17 RYS 4�J IV ;' i'a F"I FY YT3 f"'"1 °%9 1-3 1lj C,.7 Y'' F-i ,LV tr? n n 0 F3:fs E-3 i3 il-3 F-i E _ � { r-' L L{ [ ",1+f 1 ] i>•3 r.� 4Ja Fy Fy :c, N r -3 ,xJ � °� r€•« E i^a 1 I F� � F� N "U 1 C„t ! 4 4, ?J ('-1 �'• U) ... -., 4.11 c o �« 5.11 l7? tS'. G, YX'1 RA I Y (: a lY7 CTi iV .R'. !'tY co "Y'i t-{ tl i'I) I CD ,y •.. -Al ,"a7 C'� Fi r"1 it li.J ,`x7 ;'�A 1 kT.i 19 om, ea C-E C) 1 a N' :°\.A F-' C'? Y"y [;: a C"") t'.,i 00 "-^. F-` w, !41 ID ^4 f'-n CIO -.,i •...J C_'> l..'i vd eS Cv ..4d G3 ID C.'eR n h-f c-, a{'- C3 " a h 1 ID 1 !$l ! F -x f ho 1 i fa7 M m IS is W 41 W to vo W W T Y is to is tai Qj Go in K K in A vs it E �Ifll 2 11-11 -�111 lox" h' llo� 11 -o No cis s9 C 121:1 211, P, I ID z O' 9 C, I ig a 0 CD to go S21 wo s tons sm q ts - 2, 0 0 CD y 0 ".1 1". C', 11 "1 No I!, I!, t�, No i. ou" S Is to t,2 ,— 13 C, C, cD N", NL� to " i. ID I No w X I co IS r „7a G- dl co C> to hj w Q NA NJ m No NO w w ” No H W No P 01 R R �P� m Q '1�1, N.-I i�-, L., 'I'll 11 ,ill �111 it 91 Er, .1 W 11 t- MITTRI 11 1 W OIL or R� L-1 IA I'll, M1 r3 H �11 t" CT? W Q 2 '1,' cis -�j Qq,C, w cgs fy, 211 16, A &C '0 IN CI End 121 a w1 i H i k3'1 IM i Sv i M f I C_ I I P..? C *.i h? ^D h? h,) i`•,J h.S Y�.) P ^.5 ?.? C..) } I %3 1 `,d, ID C ("3 C.) ial I,.til iw GJ B_,,„ (,i1 ( J te-,# W W 6, 1 C) a 1 tiai C.3 a:.is C..J t_.,1 C.? $+) GA C":) h-' C;) C) C C7 4C ID, ID C? (.> f:') ks,,.+ i C� +,il CX) -3 Cij 0, I I f 3 ;7; oXt t'�ti 3 C11 Gs,'iF.' .K:o €JB'C.7F Ca3 -YSe ttL -W i,8'I !-' � _k", 1 -, 1" lD b] i...x t"J t..3 5,71 fJt r a j...z E.e:+ a.,ra IP C, Sal f--` (...1 !i'=. C V6 F.''. (..Y7 f..J ill (J'1 w„j I-' h- k;�1 .% 1-= (.1? CC& CX3 k,C.a co CP. !Z, W i_a i'n , W, vl? ('o til i--• 1 CT C:d iX5 F.a F� C%2 10 M,1 (.nk CJ 3 4xt H' � LP .L`+ --7 sI� 7 U1 4i) f-- 1^J C 5 iy k',3'Y S.Yi 4x3 ied k4d vi'.0 C'+l f.S'I 4+.Y { a • C) o-F� C3 CG+ + „ t'.J Ct:J 4Y;1 (.TI Sed • a9:� { t5! , ,fii w €,.,.1 fSt . Ca .. . %,:Fj .. � .: W� CJ � 4• r '� +) (,^YB {.:.>} . . £_Yl + €;=I .. -•D • Y,jt • ?3J Lal j 1 3 c(=� C3 i ti"r '.[� cmi !1'° +':..4 C.:) C,> 4-- C, .1- C7. --7 � C?;} .a L i,.J c, 'i'- ,C +: - -] F= f ^.a iJ ,�-. H I-* {-'- Sa! - -1 ij'� r..X? SD €3:J €::� - -3 tom. C:ti { I I 1 1 f�] . -I 1.3 P^,) f ",., }..r, ., ,... CD C7 •.., }..� .^,y Y._W C� ' � la, ^._ � CJ' ".., Ci .w CS ,^ '...., d...: i\:a i ' j. ! Z^J I., z ry i...i ^�„, i •J ..q � n 3 , "w ? '_ 1 s3 ! L.,,J 1 (.ai 1 }W i i w t 3.tJ t.+:t ! 1 ! f I ! C..r.1 [ +:aa ! C..-3 i W 1 r,.3 i 4D i-' C P-� FK':+ L-' l`.it k)1 l!'i 47'! t<nYi 4.i1 i.tl lii €, l f fl F-'' U, ¢" t.}j C� 0) r.�-) f.-+� --.. a) C"1) { �w e,. °'v, 1z, "vF. G.:. "`.-. C. ...: S..:F °.' K,:1 } .J ' c'._.3 C3 "�. > "^'s C.3 I- '.'_F '�^„ ' S C, (� .P. C+ .:� .C=. 4, P.Ii CP. i^n i „ti 1^JI tx'! U3 f.,)7 €aI r, rI .. Lai : C, drx C", :z . H ;. fSl :, H H C, Cx C Gs I H 11 P.:) C:tI cn ♦E..S P � P':) P-.:) }yif (3t to C,II C.Tt }..Ii Zit UI a;.p (n 0 Ln . 1 i`•.:.i (aI c", h.:? I txi t'3 S>-.a D P ^J ti'"1 w I'Cd c� ,1 *. +. / F C..) i ^' C: C1 Cl (en (,y 1+.5 ie) (,•J tz? S+.A f P f *I J t.x) +wY f...;i } i w 4 ' �-S L,,t C.2 i f tom, Ca3 C rl l:a r;, -, i._a CO 4- t N, 1il,3 i;:.r tti? Zd7 F' M'' ,t^'a .C, �a ti+ rre eC..l 41 ,t', P, � H CJ '^6'Y t,." Lo a; st r3-, -.3 3�-+ W j ID ID I..., i, C > C, Cwt Goa � h1 i ld tDl , I s : - "w1 G C) C_'} C-1 %"J tom: C) � C:'.) ID ^.,1 Cr. Cla C1 .0 10 "n CS W, C> t°l,.} P^.:7 � lr,, CJ r?. 'p, C.0 C'w} F-F i-+ tai 5' t•.i C: CS\ H^ 1-a €-' W: f-a hr- 1,_a. B-' f..�•. F-+� ...,d C? .C3 C =ut C? W J5 C�. ro C1. !i3 1 2 f i-a i 3 m I '^�.1 1 I Iz € 3 1 t.+-t f !^-` I k-j I I 1 y ..C> f„i e..?I C13 €i:g €.eJ .!' n C3 C> (...) C;5 C: C"a f::) ..a � C. r +.a C"} i._,., C� L {._a cc U c°J C:.:y C7 C) t..- U 1..'3111 C,;.) CS S? C 0 c 0 .>} i" f) C:> C? 0 'D C, f�• f3'') i^�• E3 E-n Vt C") Cy C, t_) t..::a C;3 C) C7 10 CC C) C.3 ID C1 C, C) v -' C , ,:,5 w C.) G =n C= C= ID C'> C_'] I C) 1-1 t; :: 10 ra'1 Ln a1=:. C+ C> C'> C? Ca .CD :� e' > C' U I ,J 'C::, C> C C) C-+ �, 0) 7 C l „ ^n H ti) t.,: Sta H^ h-" P-.:v P�, � ..> e•,a f ^) h) f .:. P,:; t�.a P'+? i`.aa h;) F-` E °,.) h) F ( t� k:> ,'fJ �`^ 'A1 t^a M i A13 H" p..g ;Iai i vX^yP ht C7 )_) J C 1 ^-� r3 "J ray H F'� w3 F 3 ETS F3 +-3 7J nT3 13 t Cal �'� t:7 t-; La'1 rx3 �j id IV '�J C1„1 f € .t ' ° t",7,'I c ny }-i c� rxj H t*7 c-t H :'S t--t t-t V cs ) ^a 1x7 tY+ i 'a+._ %y (t..� �" -.•.1 +thy •r aFC i'"",t 'C! YY.1 � �'€ � � [:S �.I Wt � (f9 t}%„oi ,r+ h� )"� >."3 .-i f t%J �"± 'v° "CJ i),, ".,_'',' r-a t-* F-• N H °T! H (y r-, I-e E)> ,'.'' H H Iy }-a ti. H C.) 17. I'xa C?7 H H I ("Z LJ r3 ;.J !!�--!! 1 (J 27a • C " ".1 °x is a F-I tz7 "t F L3 H ^ M Cad Ol --a C.rS P'l a..: ; 1 m T '�( °� -3 CO ,Saa m M E� S x IV I'd Ilp 'TJ' e) ni ,' H " 4.7 V> H H m H �v " E: � i3 i=.i ("1 f J i' °Is l tr) 6-^i r,t m o V3 H Q t d o o fi.J v} ;T,t I X H -' ('9 0 0 C-' C`, CEN :L I -t r� �', N •. EV i o Ls] : ^.3 t'i'] CJ <"4 n" ' +: • 3 E E 'ta 3 3 ,;3 �.Cj ;i� i f2 "'i ,',xJ a'tl �7 E i -rt IxJ Mn Cl %.Ii H ;3za 4'Z ,C X'a Lrj Ilp 1") S' -3 T. f e •. {. n ' G K3 l C+'l CO NJ hJ Et i' ^.J i-i f 1 fj "4J'jf3 1.t r J i_a'S l .3^, Y°.4 ;!;! 133 i'J E.1 M i "4 Cxl Ix Q') tri C") "r' tt--i a M U) f") C t rD s-i t"a *qy I tci tr2 i J '7v `Xi ,')..a °77 •T( �i 'XN ;7,7 C .... =3,7 C"1 C.n i m t; Pi LT3 t J M [ LTA :'?7 m I?7 - m t'J • f j W-i i�a F-I iJ F-1 �. =d 1 !'tt ;: r 4C+ CI F-+ i H' F-a H' t--+ }--. H b-+ C> H FI- CI H+ F-• I i-i C.) t'' F..x i..,, h-'_ !" h ] H t--' «...( C.? €.C'+ r� e'' i},, i- j � � � Z •.;I c5 ^: ^'Ca i•,3 1:� /.a I Cif ,tr ..€q::::: ? #• t:a i`,;z t.3 H,. r.3. K)'`a .,S F-* F-a CD r , C'.3 i-a +:fl et Hi Co W }..a. 3 0 h -a F „a kL.a }_. i a F -' ra C't CXd €T3 • +7 -J Lp N` .t tai W.e "^.. I y...: ,- W I r^'' 6-s F-+ h-' i..s i...:.. H.. •_. L19 3 Cs3 F d 4i, ..... _. 4 ".e i^,) K,:."5 •'CJ Lv rWi - + >..: -_k Ia, H }�. C3 < =x t= � 1 In C;) I i Sv i M f t2 N) N.J "I IQ CA "0 it �2 kv 00 to to Lo 00 60 Go W I-Ii to I'J to IQ 41 (A �A- _V1 X, �.n t1-I V, `_0 W -0 CA 1-n U3 IS, CA CA I Ell NO lit, 111!" tCp cs "�o -28 r 12 FO 211 q p; p; vs I rj (_A CA CA NO n1 r-3 P� ICA PA 'A rw H, C-, 1,A 21 CA 8 YV Sri A WN, M H Y 1 A Ea rg I ll di G Cj w hi 41 2210 1 C:1 PICA G1 H 'A" lw I 011 r_111 IA 'T' CA CA CA Ellicott?. 5 2 to A M 0 Few CA N M R, 1 1 D ri to CA "J, M 'R" 'A' iz, Co A w 2 eW� r'•,:� tz� cn tvu a--- iwa '.ry �.�, i,:r 0. Km) CA N r ;ftrg C} E;ii C:+ to ,V C1 .� ,ca >tj .G. c-J csJ bS? W CA h3 1..e P }9 �n GT[ ! x p..z H-1 10, "0": 3 , ♦� Jl 1 i 4n.�'+ r_5'\ L1 O U'� +'S'r C"l K.$'1 C "� `-' C?'' -+ +.�. -�. e_S Y3 C9 %J' Z-? y.3 -^*+. G.S �,. $'✓ "-� €':'A °"'s C) ^� "_ K:� "..� �. C� "`.�_ L`? CJ C.:} `*,-. CA CS'3 Ca [ z CA Ca CA Cz C, 'A 1=1 {.. e-} r7 I-) CA -h.-. c> i= «si w a a . .� ii .,-:e^a } a -> tu h . 1 " .' �".5 a Yr{^. . S = i c . u J f d1 4 .> 7 a LraH� 1 � i�r �}. � 'i %Uh P a *€� �x, f e�� Fr,./> 1 hc•_,'r i Pvn.� i ^s(=1 N, ") iJi r 1!, —ro r a c_J C� sa � p...t G :: "'tea E..J Y."t � c. V. -�J {"? k'?'a t'_J rf::. l_i Ea➢ ted it tld +C> EU Ui 4> r,7E GY�z C�a i'�a a"v •��J Kv„e S..k f_a - ^i ;) C_'3 ';w'°� C_j €J C :':.7 C.:. &"� C,'+ G Ka' v'=? {ti,'+ � iJ Ca C'; C> G'S", dJ f7 i i ( 1( 3 1 1 1 1 E 1 I I I I I E i l h� f ..Y f-� p,.s 1-' E ', F'=Z31 WHO? C� Pt1 ^i'1 7 u� � "GI f�9 rx�'J s:J i a i �) � .S� t� 's� C."J ]y� ?v.a t'.Xl 4"J !'j *�! 1 !::3 P 9 cJ r� � � 1-a 7.' y`a z+ � i-a r=l w+ C.,7 I I "A C 9 k.°r .-, � L J t.y H >•� � 1 t � t 9 1 F� 1� .ts',�: � o r-+ � �_; 41? e.1'o � i« � H F C,a ;'tl 'J �? � �'3 �. +ri -.. tx�. _•-.. H 'v 1« H t^.:i ] -a � >�+ "E M tat �'J : , ,e„ ":J "L "TJ ray " j .Ta tv C J .:.k ;ii h--' �.,3 e t, : a, f � p-r �1 k s Z [.'i1 M r"3 trz NI) f- .L ^< .C:. 4.1 rr „M3 to W NJ C. «.J F.J [t.} S of [7l i. i W to Q4"J CIB F,,.S ..,..i •..,.1 C-J i.il tXi C3 Cz'j to -4 [.1i U) NJ f--' ES:! ra'd t -• 4'+'4 i -+ CK3 4'ZA to I t-° 'u A, F"'^ iVi fCa °..::7 t31 I'•.;) 1'rs su7 Cl ",tp ;c1 t� v Na NJ r 0 :a i�cn Kn dT•i 1 f 1J C.:a. Ksr 3-i I i h- rl e �1 Ya Lai CJ k�+ .7 C? i� C! K�3 Cz C I 3 C3 C] M a0"1 r IN t7 !z1 r} �3 %� C7 f 9 C;� 1s7 � 1x1 �CCaa � } i f3 r� Csj w3 i -i ^t 653 r Cxy c h-f 1_oF t CA r „j wig 0 1 1 1 1a 1 ;x 3 1 1 1 i3 1 1 3 fl I I f 3 �B 1 r"v 7 Cj 1 t-3 t*i I 6; 1 x P-1 CA CA CA � i 3 G Zito 1: 1 mg 13 CA C CA I lrv'B r.J C �v 1 i ( i r7� CIS H Cx1 i.C3 rx1 Px1 ��+ rsy 1 H {) 1 N Y.1*. H C5v 1 1 ! f 1 =„i tii% U3 i i oil �; i �_.1 i 1 1 1 1...a 3 � 1 1 No No (a.1 i.ai to to It IS 6..9 I t.ai C.1 to (.sl (mod Cs5 [..! 4.At 00 Qj 00 2 eW� r'•,:� tz� cn tvu a--- iwa '.ry �.�, i,:r 0. Km) CA N r ;ftrg C} E;ii C:+ to ,V C1 .� ,ca >tj .G. c-J csJ bS? W CA h3 1..e P }9 �n GT[ ! x p..z H-1 10, "0": 3 , ♦� Jl 1 i 4n.�'+ r_5'\ L1 O U'� +'S'r C"l K.$'1 C "� `-' C?'' -+ +.�. -�. e_S Y3 C9 %J' Z-? y.3 -^*+. G.S �,. $'✓ "-� €':'A °"'s C) ^� "_ K:� "..� �. C� "`.�_ L`? CJ C.:} `*,-. CA CS'3 Ca [ z CA Ca CA Cz C, 'A 1=1 {.. e-} r7 I-) CA -h.-. c> i= «si w a a . .� ii .,-:e^a } a -> tu h . 1 " .' �".5 a Yr{^. . S = i c . u J f d1 4 .> 7 a LraH� 1 � i�r �}. � 'i %Uh P a *€� �x, f e�� Fr,./> 1 hc•_,'r i Pvn.� i ^s(=1 N, ") iJi r 1!, —ro r a c_J C� sa � p...t G :: "'tea E..J Y."t � c. V. -�J {"? k'?'a t'_J rf::. l_i Ea➢ ted it tld +C> EU Ui 4> r,7E GY�z C�a i'�a a"v •��J Kv„e S..k f_a - ^i ;) C_'3 ';w'°� C_j €J C :':.7 C.:. &"� C,'+ G Ka' v'=? {ti,'+ � iJ Ca C'; C> G'S", dJ f7 i i ( 1( 3 1 1 1 1 E 1 I I I I I E i l h� f ..Y f-� p,.s 1-' E ', F'=Z31 WHO? C� Pt1 ^i'1 7 u� � "GI f�9 rx�'J s:J i a i �) � .S� t� 's� C."J ]y� ?v.a t'.Xl 4"J !'j *�! 1 !::3 P 9 cJ r� � � 1-a 7.' y`a z+ � i-a r=l w+ C.,7 I I "A C 9 k.°r .-, � L J t.y H >•� � 1 t � t 9 1 F� 1� .ts',�: � o r-+ � �_; 41? e.1'o � i« � H F C,a ;'tl 'J �? � �'3 �. +ri -.. tx�. _•-.. H 'v 1« H t^.:i ] -a � >�+ "E M tat �'J : , ,e„ ":J "L "TJ ray " j .Ta tv C J .:.k ;ii h--' �.,3 e t, : a, f � p-r �1 k s Z [.'i1 M r"3 trz NI) f- .L ^< .C:. 4.1 rr „M3 to W NJ C. «.J F.J [t.} S of [7l i. i W to Q4"J CIB F,,.S ..,..i •..,.1 C-J i.il tXi C3 Cz'j to -4 [.1i U) NJ f--' ES:! ra'd t -• 4'+'4 i -+ CK3 4'ZA to I t-° 'u A, F"'^ iVi fCa °..::7 t31 I'•.;) 1'rs su7 Cl ",tp ;c1 t� v Na NJ r 0 :a i�cn Kn dT•i 1 f 1J C.:a. Ksr 3-i I i h- rl e �1 Ya Lai CJ k�+ .7 C? i� C! K�3 Cz C I 3 C3 C] M a0"1 r IN t7 !z1 r} �3 %� C7 f 9 C;� 1s7 � 1x1 �CCaa � } i f3 r� Csj w3 i -i ^t 653 r Cxy c h-f 1_oF t CA r „j wig 0 1 1 1 1a 1 ;x 3 1 1 1 i3 1 1 3 fl I I f 3 �B 1 r"v 7 Cj 1 t-3 t*i I 6; 1 x P-1 CA CA CA � i 3 G Zito 1: 1 mg 13 CA C CA I lrv'B r.J C �v 1 i ( i r7� CIS H Cx1 i.C3 rx1 Px1 ��+ rsy 1 H {) 1 N Y.1*. H C5v 1 1 ! f 1 =„i tii% U3 i i oil �; i �_.1 i 1 1 1 1...a 3 � 1 1 CG !j 1 t-3 70 1i I C,2 } , a...} '10 a, 0-1 w 1�1 ko g�, tz, 0 I M I C.) CD (D l7d ID ID C) Cp C, C.') 4.13 111) 11-0 C..3 U) 11yi Lo 1-1 CJ w 41 IV, 4, LO w IV V�l w GJ w w c, --I (.n J w J n -A Ir- W W l,. Ull Cjl a, ON V, o -n cI C D -j W H j -1 CO ul c cp ID 0) C) ul -A -1 --1 LD �DD C, 0 0 0. w C, "'D ID -1 ID W W (P -1 41 K) a, C, C> '.° w 4= - n C� 0 0, ",-n Ul ul C-n C.� ID ID j7x rs ro I cn ,n a*,. CD(D �D C, i I �D eD I C, E c C, - _j -,j �L 11 -j �11 I ,"1 1-11, I'll 011 �-. --j V, , Ly u I "ji ui cil "I IF, 1-11 0) oll a", 0� a-, 'n 'n m I, 0� 3" 13Y ID CD I-) ID C-1 C, C, (D 0 KD ID c> Q c-) c,,- cD :D 'D 'D -- C3 --- C', 4,rs n 01 0 (X 0 0 (P Sp i p Q, ("I Lj, (n U1 0 ID 0 Cl, C, Ul CD ID (p C, C, CD C> ul ID C) 0 1-) C) Q C, I'D ci, (,P in Ul Ol -n u Cn Ln fil 11 ol "I ol K, N, ll.;n ul ,41 Cj 1w CD 'r., �j (,j H w w 't, 41, 4, P., U, I- 41 ,41 W, Ua w -,� w c a., a-r, X..,• 4�. W IIJ w LO rla rl-11 ID W --, F� C, Fl., C, I-, F-, W (D w -3 C) C, flJ I,, pli Ij ttil (Y) (Ij IV. N) C', ID ILI CD W CCU 'D CTI IX U, w j �_n CD ul �,p 10 C-1 C� CZ, C) 4" �-n C-1 C, ID C> ID C) C, Lq C) ul C> CD -1 �_n C, �� f� --j -j ID C, w -A 10 1� C� ID C, C, (D -1 In w Cl ID ID 00 1--> C` cc, C> C) 10 {-, C, <D C, C) (D A In -1 cn C, r-> ID (Y u LD � C- • C> U) fu vi Ul vj -,J >, . ,j C-1 Z5 10 Cl, ell r ftj (, -:3 Co 3:E CI1 11 X ^o -9 :pl ".XJ t, cn n Yj u2 (.:d Ul D] Q'I r, 9zlI 110 "XI n 0 r m !zIl m I'M R -1 Q TA r1l 1-3 C) rM '1 0 Go W N) 13) C- U S1,[ ...,,7 �Ll J) 131, 51 w f W Jn 41 ID 41 CG !j 1 t-3 70 1i I C,2 } , a...} '10 a, 0-1 w 1�1 ko g�, tz, 0 I M I 1-41 "A 11) to 7,,,J V, t dot W NJ K- I- W W'.., t ;j t 41 ND W,, CA L.; sn 8, 8 g, C.) C) GD ID u CI - C, ID 2, U1 'a' 4-1. W M.., CD I- CA w C) w w 41 w i -a 1- CA M wC, w". � w W m cc, 13 q; q 13 q; q lot! E to 13 Etc 218 Q 1 to 1 A I ? CA C, C, I 1 vC, ,L, 5, C, CA N,J N�� N.� N,� N�) PJ C r, I'D C, NJ A NA 2: PE - �J to m m to d Nil' CA ID 11 NJ 110 N-) ZZ I 1 0 ILn l7d �Dl ILI W ­j g31 -j �j, 0 1 50 ri 'I X71 I G� AI u, ell rrJ U) r"O Uj In �D ID 0 'n cn cn C) C� C, co Q) w Q) co C) C-1 ci C, ID Q 0 4= Ci 0 0 0 110, NJ I F.1; No N, aj Qj N.) f'-p rl) r1fli to (JI Cn J, �,o W CD � ID --j NO .rl C� un IV, �,Tj 10 10 'I (IJ .11 tl-) j.. .f C) P, ID C7 C, Ul I'D E� 44- 41 U) H Ul CO Iz, LIJ u, (D 11 1 m 13 M 'A 'A pu m m �oj VI 19 m ETJ m ",7, C -Il IS, 7:a ul Ul 1XI lu H H P"1 in i 1 0 ILn l7d �Dl ILI W ­j g31 -j �j, X71 I STAFF REPORT �� gpLD��ti HUB OF °0 ;' THE 0 U x SAN GABRIEL + 2�o VALLEY .pA vh, RgrED JAN\3P� SUMMARY ITEM NO. V Attached is the Treasurer's Report for the month of November 2014. The Treasurer's Report lists all cash for the City (which includes the Baldwin Park Financing Authority), the Housing Authority, and the Successor Agency to the Community Development Commission (CDC). All investments are in compliance with the City's Investment Policy and the California Government Code. FISCAL IMPACT None That the City Council receive and file the Treasurer's Report for November 2014. 0aV01ner.,74ImIDiy None. The City's Investment Policy requires the Treasurer's Report be submitted to the Mayor and City Council on a monthly basis. LEGAL REVIEW None Required Treasurer's Report for November 2014 Page 2 BACKGROUND Attached is the Treasurer's Report for the month of November 2014. The Treasurer's Report lists all cash for the City (which includes the Baldwin Park Financing Authority), the Housing Authority, and the Successor Agency to the Community Development Commission (CDC). The report separates cash into the following three sections: • State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) — this is where the majority of the cash is held. City cash, which accounts for the largest portion includes monies from the General Fund and all other restricted funds known as Special Funds. Money is kept in LAIF until it needs to be transferred to cover warrants (payments to vendors, contractors, etc.), payroll, or to pay the various bond payments. • Fiscal Agent Funds — These amounts represent monies held by the various bond holders that are restricted and which have been set aside for future bond. payments. • Cash — This section provides the cash balances in the various checking accounts the City uses to pay its on -going payments. The cash balances Fluctuate during the year due to the timing of 'large payments, such as interest and principal for bonds, and due to when the City receives its major sources of revenues (such as sales tax and property tax in December, January and May each year. The current investments are in compliance with the City's Investment Policy and to the California Government Code. Attachment: Treasurer's Report for November 2014 CITY OF BALDWIN PARK TREASURER'S REPORT 11/30/2014 ESTIMATED INVESTMENT INTEREST PURCHASE MATURITY PAR CURRENT BOOK MARKET DESCRIPTION RATE DATE DATE VALUE PRINCIPAL VALUE VALUE State of California Local 25,092,947.62 25,092,947.62 Agency Investment Fund 25,092,947.62 Varies City 0.26% Varies Housing Authority 0.26% Varies Fiscal Agent Funds - City Varies Varies Fiscal Agent Funds - Successo Varies Varies Varies 25,092,947.62 25,092,947.62 25,092,947.62 25,092,947.62 Varies 28,028.78 28,028.78 28,028.78 28,028.78 25,120,976.40 25,120,976.40 25,120,976.40 25,120,976.40 Varies 852,773.71 852,773.71 852,773.71 852,773.71 Varies 2,937,916.83 2,937,916.83 2,937,916.83 2,937,916.83 $ 28,911,666.94 $ 28,911,666.94 3,790,690.54 $ 28,911,666.94 Total investments v 20,91 1,666.94 Cash City Checking 6,991,241.94 City Miscellaneous Cash 65,571.81 Comm. Develop. Comm. 0.00 Successor Agency 1,129,388.37 Housing Authority 403,330.14 Financing Authority 0.00 Total Cash 8,589,532.26 Total Cash and Investments $ 37,501,199.20 Schedule of Cash and Investments includes all financial assets as included in the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. There was no investment maturity /purchase transaction made for the month of November 2014 and several deposits /withdrawals were made with the Local Agency Investment Fund. In compliance with the California Government Code Section 53646 et seq., I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the City's expenditure requirements for the next six months that all investments are in compliance to the City's Statement of Investment Policy. Approved by: Finance I 4,c�,, q STAFF REP6. T 4HUB 0 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council V u THE � FROM: Shama P. Curian, Human Resources Manager DATE: January 21, 2015 SUBJECT: Claim Rejection SUMMARY This report requests the City Council reject the Claims for Damages to person or property received for filing against the City of Baldwin Park. FISCAL IMPACT Unknown at this time. Vul 12 Staff recommends City Council reject the following claims and direct staff to send the appropriate notice of rejection to claimants: Abu Larshin Brothers, Inc. Alleges that claimant was injured on City property This government claim, and all goverment claims, should be considered as potential lawsuits in the future. Thus, it is requested that all City Staff, the Mayor and all Councilmembers refrain from making any statements, whether public or private in nature. It is important that no statements be made so as to not prejudice this claim in any way which can happen if public or private comments are made about this claim by City staff or Councilmembers. LEGAL REVIEW Any specific questions should be referred to the City Attorney. In order for the statute of limitations to begin on the claims received, it is necessary for the City Council to reject the claims by order of motion and that the claimants are sent written notification of said action. ALTERNATIVES None. It MINUTES BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION AND SPECIAL MEETING JANUARY 7, 2015, 6:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBER -14403 E. Pacific Avenue, Baldwin Park, 91706 CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 6:10 p.m. by Mayor Lozano. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Councilmember Ricardo Pacheco Councilmember Susan Rubio Mayor Pro Tern Cruz Baca Mayor Manuel Lozano ABSENT: Councilmember Monica Garcia PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Mayor Lozano opened Public Communications at 6:10 p.m. Seeing no one wishing to speak, Public Communications closed at 6:10 p.m. OPEN SESSION There being no items for consideration in Open Session, Mayor Lozano recessed Open Session to Closed Session at 6:12 p.m. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION 1. REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATIONS Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 Property: A portion of APN #8554 - 005 -900; generally known as Hilda L. Solis Park Agency negotiators: Shannon Yauchzee, Robert N. Tafoya, Craig Graves Negotiating parties: SBA COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION Under negotiation: Terms and price 2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9: Potential Case(s): Two (2) 3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION Pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9: Case Name: Eastern Keystone v. City of Baldwin Park, Case No. BS 150623 Page 1 of 2 4. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATIONS Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6: Agency • -• representatives: Shannon -- ; Robert N. Tafoya Employee Organizations: G- r Maintenance Employees, • E Police Officer Association; Professional and Technical Employees Association; Clerical Employees Association; Police Management Employees Association; Classified Confidential Employees Association; Classified Management Employees Association Unrepresented Employee(s): City Planner; Housing Authority Manager; Community Development Director; Human Res• - . • Police - Director; Public • i • Recreation • Community Services Director ADJOURNMENT There being no further business for discussion, Council recessed Closed Session at 6:58 p.m REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION Mayor Lozano reported after Closed Session that, by a vote of 4 -0 -1 (Councilmember Garcia was absent), Council authorized the law firm of Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck to represent the City of Baldwin Park on potential legal action against the City of Irwindale, as referenced on Item No. 2 of the Closed Session Agenda. There was no other action taken on the remainder of items discussed in Closed Session. Mayor City Clerk Page 2 of 2 MINUTES BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 7, 2015, 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBER -14403 E. Pacific Avenue, Baldwin Park, 91706 These minutes are presented in Agenda order. Various announcements or discussions may have occurred before or after the title under which they are presented. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Lozano at 7:10 p.m. INVOCATION The invocation was provided by Councilmember Pacheco. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Lozano. ROLL CALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Council Member Monica Garcia Council Member Ricardo Pacheco Council Member Susan Rubio Mayor Pro Tern Cruz Baca Mayor Manuel Lozano REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION Mayor Lozano stated that, by a vote of 4-0-1 (Councilmember Garcia was absent), Council authorized the law firm of Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck to represent the City of Baldwin Park on potential legal action against the City of Irwindale, as referenced on Item No. 2 of the Closed Session Agenda. There was no other action taken on the remainder of items discussed in Closed Session. Following this report, Closed Session was adjourned. ANNOUNCEMENTS Mayor Pro Tern Baca requested that the meeting be closed in memory of long-time Baldwin Park resident Alice Esquivel, who passed recently after succumbing to Alzheimer's disease. Councilmember Pacheco asked that the community keep in mind the Conseco family, with prayers going to Jorge Conseco's wife who is hospitalized with heart problems; informed everyone that St. John's the Baptist Church is hosting its fundraising Fashion Show again and encouraged attendance; expressed appreciation to the Baldwin Park Police Department and the wonderful turn-out at the Baldwin Park Police Association's holiday event; Treasurer Contreras extended appreciation to the Baldwin Park Police Department for their time and efforts with the toy drive; mentioned that Macy's felt the event was very successful and is looking forward to participation next year Clerk Avila also commented on the great success of the holiday events and the tireless efforts of the Baldwin Park Police Department. Mayor Pro Tern Baca echoed the comments of other Councilmembers, thanking the Recreation and Community Services staff for their work in putting together the Tree Lighting Ceremony, Christmas Baskets for needy families, and all who coordinated Breakfast with Santa, which was a tremendous success. PROCLAMATIONS. COMMENDATIONS & PRESENTATIONS None. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Mayor Lozano opened Public Communications at 7:14 p.m. and noted that each speaker is permitted a total of three (3) minutes to speak. Al Luna, Baldwin Park resident, inquired about the meeting minutes on the agenda which were from 2013; expressed hope that the community would be prosperous; commended Council on its performance last year and expressed encouragement for a more successful year in 2015. John Kerri, stated that his brother belongs to the local Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFS) membership and that the VFW is suffering severe financial hardship; said that he hopes to put the word out to encourage the community to provide assistance; made note of the upcoming election year and expressed concern regarding campaign contributions and alleged deception associated with it; commented on the head of the youth soccer league and the purported falsification of financial records. Greg Tuttle, Baldwin Park business owner, commented on the overdue meeting minutes, stating that they are being done correctly and staff is trying to bring the records up to date; noted that there has been no report from Closed Session on the Stitchman/Vineland matter; stated that he intends to pursue the matter with the youth soccer league and plans to meeting with the school district; asserted that allowing the youth soccer league to use the fields free of charge must stop and that all other organizations (churches, non - profit groups and organizations, etc.) are paying for the use of the parks; opined that the youth soccer league should not allowed to use the fields for free because they have friends on the Council; acknowledged that the youth soccer league had previously been billed for lighting but that they were slow to pay, and during 2014 they were never billed at all; stated that everyone should be paying their share and that the City is missing on the revenue because of "buddy deals." Margarita Vargas, Baldwin Park resident, opined that the City Treasurer should be making monthly reports to provide citizens with the cash flow status of City's funds; stated that she is aware that the information is available as public records but that she wishes it to be provided each month. John Rios, Baldwin Park resident, stated that he had canvassed surrounding cities and spoke to representatives from the National and American little league baseball groups, asking about who is allowed to play on the teams and whether they pay for the use of facilities; pointed out that National pays for the field covers and for use of the fields. Magda Torrellas, Housing Commissioner, commented on the increase in vacant store fronts in the city; suggested that a `food court' be created in the city to include Italian, sushi and other cuisine; noted that there has been an increase of refuse being left on the side of the road and sidewalks, and is asking that Code Enforcement step in; introduced a new Baldwin Park resident, Tony Nguen, a decorated Iraqi veteran and accomplished student at Citrus College. Page 2 of 6 Tony Nguen, new resident in Baldwin Park, expressed interest in City matters and getting involved in the community. Terri Muse, Waste Management, Inc., announced that there was, erroneously, a $5 administrative fee added to the billing on commercial accounts; stated that this was a mistake and a credit will be issued in the next billing cycle; recognized employees at Waste Management who volunteered to adopt two families over the holidays; stated that there was a tremendous outpour by workers who contributed money, food and staples, clothing and toys; noted that she attended the Baldwin Park Business Association luncheon and expressed gratitude to Council and Police representatives who support the association. Seeing no others wishing to speak, Public Communications closed at 7:34 p.m. Treasurer Contreras announced that she had previously been providing an oral report of the City's finances but this practice was eliminated and the Warrants and Demands item was added to the Consent Calendar. Councilmember Rubio suggested that the financial reports provided to the Council could also be provided on the City's website as an additional resource for the community to obtain the City's financial information. Mayor Pro Tern Baca pointed out that the City has an Audit Committee and the group will be holding a meeting in the near future; suggested and encouraged that those who are interested to attend the meetings; noted that the meetings are held quarterly and are open to the public. Councilmember Rubio noted that members of the Audit Committee include members of the business community as well as City representatives. Councilmember Garcia recognized Ms. Vargas' request and suggested that a 'short version' of the finance report be developed and reported out by the City Treasurer; also suggested that any briefs or reports from the Auditors be provided. Mr. Graves, Director of Finance, informed Councilmember Garcia that the audit has been completed and that the results of the audit will be reported at the next Audit Committee meeting in January, and then will be presented to Council at its first meeting in February. Mayor Pro Tern Baca expressed appreciation to Mr. Graves and his staff for all their hard work in meeting the deadlines and needs to complete the audit. Councilmember Pacheco commented on the minutes presented from 2013 and pointed out that predecessor management had directed that meeting minutes no longer be prepared in hard copy; noted that, with the change in management and staff, the outstanding minutes are being prepared and brought up to date; pointed out that the City has taken actions to support a broad number of youth leagues in the city and not just the youth soccer league; stated that the youth soccer league use facilities both on school district property and city property; went on to say that he would like staff to pursue the possibility of continuing to hold the Street Fairs throughout the upcoming year; announced various upcoming events including wrestling events, the Lunar New Year Celebration, and the senior center valentine's dance. Councilmember Garcia suggested that Council consider restoring some of the other programs and activities that were held prior to the economic crash, including the July 4t" fireworks display and the annual parade. Page 3 of 6 Mayor Pro Tern Baca expressed support for re- launching the annual parade but suggested that it be incorporating it with the holiday events as a compliment to the tree lighting event and the Police Department's toy drive. Councilmember Pacheco suggested that a workshop be held at which all of these ideas and more could be discussed, and support was echoed by Councilmember Rubio. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. WARRANTS AND DEMANDS Staff recommends City Council ratify the attached Warrants and Demands Register. A motion was made by Lozano, seconded by Pacheco, and carried (5 — 0) to ratify the Warrants and Demands Register. AYES: Lozano, Baca, Garcia, Rubio, Pacheco NOES: None. AQCC:KM: None. /'�UV LIY 1 ABSTAIN: None. 2. CLAIMS REJECTION Staff recommends City Council reject the following claims and direct staff to send the appropriate notice of rejection to claimants: Geico Indemnity a /s /o D. Burley Claimant alleges damages caused to vehicle Rodriguez, Edgar Claimant alleges improper impound of vehicle Zambruno, Marisa Claimant alleges improper impound of vehicle A motion was made by Lozano, seconded by Pacheco, and carried (5 — 0) to reject the following claims and direct staff to send the appropriate notice of rejection to claimants. AYES: Lozano, Baca, NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. Garcia, Rubio, Pacheco 3. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES Receive and file: A. Meeting Minutes of February 6, 2013, for the Regular Meeting of the City Council. B. Amended Meeting Minutes of August 20, 2014, for the Regular Meeting of the City Council. C. Meeting Minutes of December 17, 2014, for the Study Session and Special Meeting, Regular Meeting, Housing Authority and Finance Authority meetings of the City Council. A motion was made by Lozano, seconded by Pacheco, and carried (5 — 0) to receive and file the minutes. AYES: Lozano, Baca, Garcia, Rubio, Pacheco NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. Page 4 of 6 4. CONDUCT A SECOND READING, BY TITLE ONLY AND WAIVE FURTHER READING, AND FOLLOWING SUCH READING, ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 1367, ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING THE VACANT AND ABANDONED PROPERTY REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS AT SECTION 150.250 ET SEQ. OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE." Staff recommends that Council conduct a second reading, by title only, and waive further reading, and following such reading, adopt Ordinance No. 1367, entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING THE VACANT AND ABANDONED PROPERTY REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS AT SECTION 150.250 ET SEQ. OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE." A motion was made by Lozano, seconded by Pacheco, and carried 15 — 0) to conduct a second reading, by title only, and waive further reading, and following such reading, adopt Ordinance No. 1367, entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING THE VACANT AND ABANDONED PROPERTY REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS AT SECTION 150.250 ET SEQ. OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE. ". AYES: Lozano, Baca, Garcia, Rubio, Pacheco NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. REPORTS OF OFFICERS None. CITY COUNCIL / CITY CLERK / CITY TREASURER / STAFF REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS MAYOR PRO TEM BACA - Request that the next Council meeting include a presentation to recognize Rosie Breceda, 35 -year business owner of Pen Mar Beauty Salon; - Requested that an invitation to apply for the position of Personnel Commissioner be posted, noting that there are currently three openings that need to be filled; - Requested that Code Enforcement look into designating parking on Badillo Street as a "permit parking only." - Requested that staff look into the current ordinance to determine whether it specifies that applicants [for a permit to sell fireworks] stand must have a bank account establish in Baldwin Park; requested, if that is the case, that an amendment to the ordinance be prepared and presented to Council for approval. Page 5 of 6 COUNCILMEMBER PACHECO - Requested that staff make a field visit to Able's Transmission Shop to determine whether some street lighting could be installed in his area to deter graffiti and unlawful activities in the area. MAYOR LOZANO - Inquired as to the status of the redesign of Main Street and the surrounding area, noting that residents on California Street are requesting a stop sign be installed. o Mr. Wall, Director of Public Works, stated that he would direct staff to place a traffic counter to determine whether traffic patterns in the area would warrant installation of a stop sign. ADJOURNMENT There being no other business to discuss, and all other matters having been addressed, a motion was made by Mayor Lozano, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Baca, to adjourn the meeting at 7:50 p.m. Mayor ATTEST: Manuel Lozano, Mayor Alejandra Avila, City Clerk --:• ill Page 6 of 6 HUB UTHE 0 SAN ZRIEL m 20o VALLEY` ?q tih, O�gTED JANUP'�� VI ► A • A ITEM NO. TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Daniel Wall, P.E., Director of Public Works / City Enginee DATE: January 21, 2015 y SUBJECT: Authorize Storm Water Pollution Inspections Services Agreement This will authorize Infrastructure Engineers to conduct storm water pollution compliance inspections on behalf of the City of Baldwin Park. The inspections are mandated by State law and by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RNx7(X B) FISCAL IMPACT The approval of this agreement will not impact the City's General Fund. Businesses being inspected will be billed for the cost of the inspection. The total value of the contract is estimated to be less than $30,000. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Authorize Infrastructure Engineers to conduct storm water pollution compliance inspections on behalf of the City in accordance with the attached scope of services; and 2. Authorize the Mayor to execute the attached professional services agreement; and 3. Authorize the Director of Finance to make appropriate transfers and fund adjustments. BACKGROUND The current storm water (MS4) permit issued by the RWQCB, requires permittees to conduct storm water pollution compliance inspections of commercial, industrial, and manufacturing businesses on a two -year cycle. Under this agreement, Infrastructure Engineers will conduct these inspections on behalf of the City. Services provided in addition to the physical inspections will include bill preparation, payment tracking, and required reporting. The fee charged for these inspections is $96.80 for restaurants and $116.60 for other commercial, industrial, and manufacturing businesses. Included in this fee is the City's 10% markup of the consultant's fee to cover the City's administrative costs. These fees are nearly 50% less than the fees charged by the County of Los Angeles for its storm water pollution compliance inspections. On June 18, 2014, the City Council authorized a three year professional services agreement naming Infrastructure Engineers as the provider of on -call engineering services to the City. That agreement requires that work in excess of $10,000 be brought to the City Council for its review and approval. LEGAL REVIEW None required AWARD AN URBAN RUNOFF INSPECTION SERVICES CONTRACT JANUARY 21, 2015 Paee 2 ALTERNATIVES These inspections could be conducted with in -house staff, however the time requirements to conduct these inspections throughout the City would lead to delays in development review and capital improvement projects. If inspections are not conducted, the city would be in violation of the storm water permit and subject to being fined by RWQCB. ATTACHMENTS A. Professional Services Agreement This Agreement is entered into this 21th day of January, 2015 by and between the City of Baldwin Park ( "CITY ") and Advanced Applied Engineering, Inc, DBA Infrastructure Engineers ( "SERVICE PROVIDER "). -ffX#_ A. CITY has determined that it requires the following professional services from a SERVICE PROVIDER: Inspection Services in compliance with the CITY's NPDES storm water Program. B. SERVICE PROVIDER represents that it is fully qualified to perform such pro Ussional services by virtue of its experience arid the training, education and expertise of its principals and employees. SERVICE PROVIDER further represents that it is willing to accept responsibility for performing such services in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual covenants and conditions herein contained, CITY and SERVICE PROVIDER agree as follows: 11NME i7 X141-01 M7►f.` A. "Scope of Services ": Such professional services as are set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. B. "Approved Fee Schedule ": Such compensation rates as are set forth in the fee schedule attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference. C. "Commencement Date ": January 27, 2015 D. "Expiration Date ": March 23, 2015 A. Scone of Services. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, SERVICE PROVIDER shall perform the services identified in the Scope of Services. CITY shall have the right to request, in writing, changes in the scope of work or the services to be performed. Any changes mutually agreed upon by the parties, and any increase or decrease in compensation, shall be incorporated by written amendments to this Agreement. B. Time for Performance. SERVICE PROVIDER shall commence the services on the Commencement Date and shall perform all services in conformance with the project timeline set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. C. Standard of Performance. SERVICE PROVIDER shall perform all work to the highest professional standards and in a manner reasonably satisfactory to CITY. SERVICE -I- PROVIDER shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, codes and regulations. A. City Representative. For the purposes of this Agreement, the contract administrator and CITY's representative shall be the City Director of Public Works /City En ig neer, (hereinafter the "City Representative "). It shall be SERVICE PROVIDER's responsibility to assure that the City Representative is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services, and SERVICE PROVIDER shall refer any decisions which must be made by CITY to the City Representative. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of CITY required hereunder shall mean the approval of the City Representative. B. SERVICE PROVIDER Representative. For the purposes of this Agreement, Raymond R. Abassi. P.E. is hereby designated as the principal and representative of SERVICE. PROVIDER authorized to act on its behalf with respect to the services specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith (the "Responsible Principal "). The Responsible Principal may not be changed by SERVICE PROVIDER without the prior written approval of CITY. Cl�.y1:�L:Cll: #l�l A. SERVICE PROVIDER represents that it has, or will secure at its own expense, all personnel required to perform the services required under this Agreement. All such services will be performed by SERVICE PROVIDER or under its supervision, and all personnel engaged in the work shall possess the qualifications, permits and licenses required by applicable law to perform such services. B. SERVICE PROVIDER shall be solely responsible for the satisfactory work performance of all personnel engaged in performing services required by this Agreement, and compliance with all reasonable performance standards established by CITY. C. In the event that CITY, in its sole discretion, at anytime during the term of this Agreement, desires the removal of any person or persons assigned by SERVICE PROVIDER to perform services pursuant to this Agreement, SERVICE PROVIDER shall remove any such person immediately upon receiving notice from CITY of the desire of CITY for the removal of such person or persons. D. SERVICE PROVIDER shall be responsible for payment of all employees' and subSERVICE PROVIDERs' wages and benefits and shall comply with all requirements pertaining to employer's liability, workers' compensation, unemployment insurance, and Social Security. E. Permits and Licenses. SERVICE PROVIDER shall obtain and maintain during the Agreement term all necessary licenses, permits and certificates required by law for the provision of services under this Agreement, including a City of Baldwin Park business license. Except as otherwise authorized by CITY in writing, SERVICE PROVIDER shall, at its sole cost and expense, furnish all facilities and equipment which may be required for famishing services pursuant to this Agreement. This Agreement is effective as of the Commencement Date and shall terminate on the Expiration Date, unless sooner terminated as provided in Section 18 herein. A. CITY agrees to compensate SERVICE PROVIDER for the services provided under this Agreement, and SERVICE PROVIDER agrees to accept in full satisfaction for such services, a sum not to exceed th�irtthousand thousand ($30,000). payable as earned during the Project in accordance with Exhibit B. The compensation payable hereunder includes all professional services. Payments shall be made in accordance with Section 8 herein. CITY shall not withhold applicable federal or state payroll or any other required taxes, or other authorized deductions from each payment made to SERVICE PROVIDER. No claims for compensation in excess of the not-to-exceed amount for the Project as shown in Exhibit B will be allowed unless such additional compensation is authorized by CITY in writing. All requests for compensation in excess of the not-to-exceed amount must be submitted to and approved by the City Representative. B. The amount set forth in paragraph A shall include reimbursement for all actual and necessary expenditures reasonably incurred in the performance of this Agreement. C. Additional Services. No claims for additional services performed by SERVICE PROVIDER which are beyond the scope set forth in Exhibit A will be allowed unless such additional work is authorized by CITY in writing prior to the performance of such services. Additional services, if any are authorized, shall be compensated on a time and materials basis using SERVICE PROVIDER's Approved Fee Schedule (Exhibit B). Fees for such additional services shall be paid within thirty (30) days of the date SERVICE PROVIDER issues an invoice to CITY for such services. H,* 10001013H"110 SERVICE PROVIDER shall submit to CITY an invoice, on a monthly basis, for the services performed pursuant to this Agreement. Each invoice shall itemize the services rendered during the billing period and the amount due. Such itemizations shall include the days worked, number of hours worked, and authorized reimbursable expenses incurred with appropriate back- up documentation and receipts evidencing the authorized expenses, if any, for each day in the period and shall separately describe any additional services authorized by CITY. Any invoice claiming compensation for additional services shall include appropriate documentation of CITY's prior authorization. Within ten (10) business days of receipt of each invoice, CITY shall notify SERVICE PROVIDER in writing of any disputed amounts included on the invoice. -3- Within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of each invoice, CITY shall pay all undisputed amounts included on the invoice up to the maximum amount set forth in Section 7. All reports, documents or other written material ("written products") developed by SERVICE PROVIDER in the performance of this Agreement shall be and remain the property of CITY without restriction or limitation upon its use or dissemination by CITY. SERVICE PROVIDER may take and retain such copies of the written products as desired, but no such written products shall be the subject of a copyright application by SERVICE PROVIDER. Travel required by S ERVICE PROVIDER or any suba ERVICE PROVIDER or subcontractor pursuant to this Agreement shall not be a reimbursable expense. �1121 112920 SERVICE PROVIDER will act hereunder as an independent contractor. This Agreement shall not and is not intended to constitute SERVICE PROVIDER as an agent, servant, or employee of CITY and shall not and is not intended to create the relationship of partnership, joint venture or association between CITY and SERVICE PROVIDER. 12. CONFIDENTIALITY All data, documents, discussion, or other information developed or received by SERVICE PROVIDER or provided for performance of this Agreement are deemed confidential and shall not be disclosed by SERVICE PROVIDER without prior written consent by CITY. CITY shall grant such consent if disclosure is legally required or necessary to provide the services under this Agreement. All CITY data shall be returned to CITY upon the termination of this Agreement. SERVICE PROVIDER's covenant under this Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement. SERVICE PROVIDER hereby warrants for itself, its employees, and subcontractors that those persons presently have no interest and shall not obtain any interest, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of the services contemplated by this Agreement. No person having such conflicting interest shall be employed by or associated with SERVICE PROVIDER in connection with this project. SERVICE PROVIDER hereby warrants for itself, its employees, and subcontractors that no such person shall engage in any conduct which would constitute a conflict of interest under any CITY ordinance, state law or federal statute. SERVICE PROVIDER agrees that a clause substantially similar to this Section shall be incorporated into any sub-contract that SERVICE PROVIDER executes in connection with the performance of this Agreement. M 1 ! A. To the full extent permitted by law, SERVICE PROVIDER shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its elected officials, officers, agents, employees, attorneys, servants, volunteers, successors and assigns from and against any and all claims, demands, causes of action, liability, losses, costs or expenses for any damage due to death or injury to any person and injury to any property resulting from any alleged intentional, reckless, negligent or otherwise wrongful acts, errors or omissions of SERVICE PROVIDER or any of its officers, employees, servants, agents, subcontractors, volunteers or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of SERVICE PROVIDER in the performance of this Agreement. Such costs and expenses shall include reasonable attorneys' fees incurred by counsel of CITY's choice. The parties understand and agree that the duty of SERVICE PROVIDER to indemnify and hold 'harmless includes the duty to defend as set forth in Section 2778 of the California Civil Code. B. SERVICE PROVIDER's obligations under this or any other provision of this Agreement will not be limited by the provisions of any workers compensation act or similar act. SERVICE PROVIDER expressly waives its statutory immunity under such statutes or laws as to CITY, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers. C. SERVICE PROVIDER agrees to obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those in this Section from each and every subcontractor or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of SERVICE PROVIDER in the performance of this Agreement. In the event SERVICE PROVIDER fails to obtain such indemnity obligations for the benefit of CITY, SERVICE PROVIDER agrees to be fully responsible and indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims and losses, costs or expenses for any damage due to death or injury to any person and injury to any property resulting from any alleged, intentional, reckless, negligent or otherwise wrongful acts, errors or omissions of SERVICE PROVIDER or any of its officers, employees, servants, agents, subcontractors, volunteers or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of SERVICE PROVIDER in the performance of this Agreement. Such costs and expenses shall include reasonable attorneys' fees incurred by counsel of CITY's choice. D. CITY does not, and shall not, waive any rights that it may possess against SERVICE PROVIDER because of the acceptance by CITY, or the deposit with CITY, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this Agreement. This hold harmless and indemnification provision shall apply regardless of whether or not any insurance policies are determined to be applicable to the claim, demand, damage, liability, loss, cost or expense. SERVICE PROVIDER agrees that SERVICE PROVIDER's covenant under this Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement. E. SERVICE PROVIDER agrees to pay all required taxes on amounts paid to SERVICE PROVIDER under this Agreement, and to indemnify and hold CITY harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against CITY by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement. SERVICE PROVIDER shall -5- fully comply with the workers' compensation laws regarding SERVICE PROVIDER and SERVICE PROVIDER's employees. SERVICE PROVIDER further agrees to indemnify and hold CITY harmless from any failure of SERVICE PROVIDER to comply with applicable workers' compensation laws. CITY shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees due to SERVICE PROVIDER under this Agreement any amount due to CITY from SERVICE PROVIDER as a result of SERVICE PROVIDER's failure to promptly pay to CITY any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section. A. SERVICE PROVIDER shall at all times during the term of this Agreement carry, maintain, and keep in full force and effect, insurance as follows: 1. Commercial Genera' Liability Insurance with minimum limits of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) for each occurrence and in the aggregate for any personal injury, death, loss or damage. 2. Automobile Liability Insurance for any owned, non -owned or hired vehicle used in connection with the performance of this Agreement with minimum limits of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3. Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California. 4. Professional Liability Insurance with a minimum limit of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence. B. SERVICE PROVIDER shall require each of its sub- SERVICE PROVIDERS or sub- contractors to maintain insurance coverage that meets all of the requirements of this Agreement. C. The policies required by this Agreement shall be issued by an insurer admitted in the State of California and with a rating of at least A:VII in the latest edition of Best's Insurance Guide. D. SERVICE PROVIDER agrees that if it does not keep the insurance required in this Agreement in full force and effect, CITY may either immediately terminate this Agreement or, if insurance is available at a reasonable cost, CITY may take out the necessary insurance and pay, at SERVICE PROVIDER'S expense, the premium thereon. E. Prior to commencement of work under this Agreement, SERVICE PROVIDER shall file with CITY's Risk Manager a certificate or certificates of insurance showing that the insurance policies are in effect and satisfy the required amounts and specifications required pursuant to this Agreement. F. SERVICE PROVIDER shall provide proof that policies of insurance expiring during the term of this Agreement have been renewed or replaced with other policies providing I on at least the same coverage. Such proof will be furnished at least two weeks prior to the expiration of the coverages. G. The general liability and automobile policies of insurance shall contain an endorsement naming CITY, its elected officials, officers, agents, employees, attorneys, servants, volunteers, successors and assigns as additional insureds. All of the policies shall contain an endorsement providing that the policies cannot be canceled or reduced except on thirty (30) days' prior written notice to CITY. SERVICE PROVIDER agrees to require its insurer to modify the certificates of insurance to delete any exculpatory wording stating that failure of the insurer to mail written notice of cancellation imposes no obligation, and to delete the word "endeavor" with regard to any notice provisions. H. The insurance provided by SERVICE PROVIDER shall be primary to any other coverage available to CITY. Any insurance or self - insurance maintained by CITY, its officers, employees, agents or volunteers, shall be in excess of SERVICE PROVIDER's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 1. All insurance coverage provided pursuant to this Agreement shall not prohibit SERVICE PROVIDER, and SERVICE PROVIDER's employees, agents, subcontractors, or volunteers from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss. SERVICE PROVIDER hereby waives all rights of subrogation against CITY. J. Any deductibles or self - insured retentions must be approved by CITY. At the option of CITY, SERVICE PROVIDER shall either reduce or eliminate the deductibles or self - insured retentions with respect to CITY, or SERVICE PROVIDER shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and expenses. K. If SERVICE PROVIDER is a Limited Liability Company, general liability coverage must be amended so that the Limited Liability Company and its managers, affiliates, employees, agents, and other persons necessary or incidental to its operation are insureds. L. Procurement of insurance by SERVICE PROVIDER shall not be construed as a limitation of SERVICE PROVIDER's liability or as full performance of SERVICE PROVIDER's duties to indemnify, hold harmless and defend under Section 14 of this Agreement. 16. MUTUAL COOPERATION A. CITY shall provide SERVICE PROVIDER with all pertinent data, documents and other requested information as is reasonably available for the proper performance of SERVICE PROVIDER's services. B. In the event any claim or action is brought against CITY relating to SERVICE PROVIDER's performance in connection with this Agreement, SERVICE PROVIDER shall render any reasonable assistance that CITY may require. -7- SERVICE PROVIDER shall maintain full and accurate records with respect to all matters covered under this Agreement for a period of three (3) years. CITY shall have access, without charge, upon reasonable notice, during normal business hours to such records, and the right to examine and audit the same and to make transcripts therefrom, and to inspect all program data, documents, proceedings, and activities. A. CITY shall have the right to terminate this Agreement for any reason or for no reason on five (5) calendar days' written notice to SERVICE PROVIDER. SERVICE PROVIDER shall have the right to terminate this Agreement for any reason or no reason on sixty (60) calendar days' written notice to CITY. SERVICE PROVIDER agrees to cease all work under this Agreement on or before the effective date of such notice. All completed and uncompleted products up to the date of receipt of written notice of termination shall become the property of CITY. B. In the event of termination or cancellation of this Agreement by CITY, due to no fault or failure of performance by SERVICE PROVIDER, SERVICE PROVIDER shall be paid based on the percentage of work satisfactorily performed at the time of termination. In no event shall SERVICE PROVIDER be entitled to receive more than the amount that would be paid to SERVICE PROVIDER for the full performance of the services required by this Agreement. i 9. I+ ORk-1 MA.IEiJRE SERVICE PROVIDER shall not be liable for any failure to perform if SERVICE PROVIDER presents acceptable evidence, in CITY's sole judgment, that such failure was due to causes beyond the control, and without the fault or negligence of SERVICE PROVIDER. 20. NOTICES Any notices, bills, invoices, or reports required by this Agreement shall be deemed received on: (a) the day of delivery if delivered by hand or overnight courier service during SERVICE PROVIDER's and CITY's regular business hours; or (b) on the third business day following deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, to the addresses heretofore below, or to such other addresses as the parties may, from time to time, designate in writing. If to CITY: Attn: Daniel Wall P.E. Director of Public Works City of Baldwin Park 14403 E. Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, California 91706 Telephone: (626) 813 -5251 email: dwall(abaldwinpark.com If to SERVICE PROVIDER: Attn: Raymond Abassi, P.E. Project Manager Infrastructure Engineers 1815 E. Helm Ave. Suite 100 Orange, CA 92865 Telephone: (714) 940 -0100 email: rabassia infeng.co With a courtesy copy to: Robert N. Tafoya, City Attorney Tafoya & Garcia LLP 316 West 2nd Street Suite 1000 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Telephone: (213) 617 -0600 21. NON - DISCRIMINATION AND EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY In the performance of this Agreement, SERVICE PROVIDER shall not discriminate against any employee, subcontractor, or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual nr1entatinn or ether hack prohibited by law. SERVICE PRO�TTT . will Y 1l. Ll\ take affirmative action to ensure that subcontractors and applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual orientation. 22. PROHIBITION AGAINST ASSIGNMENT SERVICE PROVIDER shall not delegate, transfer, subcontract or assign its duties or rights hereunder, either in whole or in part, without CITY's prior written consent, and any attempt to do so shall be void and of no effect. CITY shall not be obligated or liable under this Agreement to any party other than SERVICE PROVIDER. bi ►Mi In the event that CITY or SERVICE PROVIDER commences any legal action or proceeding to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its costs of suit, including reasonable attorney's fees. 24. ENTIRE AGREEMENT All documents referenced as exhibits in this Agreement are hereby incorporated in this Agreement. In the event of any material discrepancy between the express provisions of this Agreement and provisions of any document incorporated by reference, the provisions of this Agreement shall prevail. This instrument contains the entire Agreement between CITY and SERVICE PROVIDER with respect to the subject matter herein. No other prior oral or written agreements are binding on the parties. Any modification of this Agreement will be effective only if it is in writing and executed by CITY and SERVICE PROVIDER. • This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In the event of litigation between the parties, venue in State trial courts shall N lie exclusively in Los Angeles County. In the event of litigation in a United States District Court, exclusive venue shall lie in the Central District of California. Wherever possible, each provision of this Agreement shall be interpreted in such a manner as to be valid under applicable law. If any provision of this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall nevertheless continue in full force and effect. 27. CAPTIONS The captions used in this Agreement are solely for reference and the convenience of the parties. The captions are not a part of the Agreement, in no way bind, limit, or describe the scope or intent of any provision, and shall have no effect upon the construction or interpretation of any provision herein. 28. EXECUTION This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which when taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument. -10- TO EFFECTUATE THIS AGREEMENT, the parties have caused their duly authorized representatives to execute this Agreement on the dates set forth below. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. Manual Lozano Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk SERVICE PROVIDER: By: Raymond Abassi - President name and title By: name and title 707089 -6 A -1 11 y 707083 -6 B -1 707089 -6 C -1 INFRASTRUCTURE Heim Ave., B��W����� E. � �' Orange, CA 83885 ENGINEERS ' ���`�����`������`k�� Te|.:(714) 94O'8100 ~�~ Fax: (714) S40-O70n xvmom.infeng.co December 3.2O|4 Mr. David Lopez, Associate Engineer City ofBaldwin Park {4403 East Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, C/\9|706 RE City of Baldwin Park — Inspection and Keporting Services for municipal ' 3epuruce Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit compliance Dear David: Thank you for giving Infrastructure Engineers the opportunity to present this proposal to provide Inspection Services to assist the City with the M34 permit authorized by the federal Clean Water /\cc In order to get a better understanding of the scope of work, we have reviewed the latest State Regulations and City Ordinances for ytormovvater management programs for the preparing of this proposal. Since 200|` all PermitteesinLos Angeles County Region have been required to inspect commercial/industrial facilities with different frequencies. Per the previous MS4 permit issued by Order 0 1 - 182, the default inspection frequency for I nclustrial/Commercial facilities was twice during the five (5)-year term of the Order, and that there is a nninirnurn interval of one year. On November 8, 2012, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board inLos Angeles Region issued the new M34 permit for the ddey in the Loo Angeles County including Los Angeles County Flood Control District per Order No R4-2012-0175. The new y4S4 permit, thereafter, requires several new and continued implementation requirements including that the Municipalities implement an Industrial/Commercial Facilities Control Program (inspection Program) as addressed on Section V|. D.6.d & e of Order y4n. R4-2012-0175. The new permit requires to develop and implement a Progressive Enforcement Policy to ensure that (|) regulated Industrial/Commercial facilities, C8 construction sites, (B development and redevelopment sites with post-construction controls, and (4) illicit discharges within areaxonab|e time period are addrenued, as specified in the Order briefly described as a Inspect Commercial Sources: Inspect all commercial facilities identified in PartVi.E).6b twice during the 5-year term of the Order, provided that the first mandatory compliance inspection occurs no later than City of*aldvvin Park: wPDBInspection Page 1815 E. Heim �* 100 ���F����T������r�J�� � ` Ave., ` � ������0���������� Orange, CA 9288� ��o'm��0@"�����0��� Toi:(714) 94U'V1VV ?�~ Fax: (714) 940-0700 vvvmw.inhong.uu 2 years after the effective date of the Order. /\ noininounn interval of 6 months between � Inspect Industrial Sources: Inspect all industries no later than 2 years after the effective date of the Order. A minimum interval of 6 months between the first and the second inspection is required. |\ |nsoec6onhnr{-urnmerdoKndustrkd Illegal Connection and Discharge 0C/[A This Inspection program is one component o[the City's overall Illicit connection and Discharge Detection including city's storm drain map, Vrdinances, reporting, and recnrdkaepin& The Inspection details City's approach to illicit connection and discharge related to the requirements of MS4 permit. It fu{fii|x u portion of the requirements for rninirnurn control nneaoure(MCM) of the City's Storm Water Management Plan, and also includes on approach for investigation and elimination of pollutants at the point source. The City is required for administering the plan and compiling compliance data for annual reporting to the State Water Quality Control Board. There are three types of inspections considered — "routine ioxpecdons", "priority inspections" and "C}n-co||" inspections. ''Roucine" inspections are conducted at Identified/Targeted Businesses as described on Section V|.O.8.b.i & ii. If a business shows evidence of active non- mturnnvvater pollutant discharges during a routine visual inspection, it is subject to ^'priority" inspection requiring an appropriate 6uUovv up. ''[Jn-Ca||" inspections are conducted when complaint iofiled with the City following reported or referred non- stornnvvater discharge or pollutant exposure. The routine vimou| inspection program can be broken down into u |>sL of commonly high probability locations where illicit discharges may occur us following. 0 Fast Problems — Areas where problems have occurred in the past. This may include locations with known problematic vvutar qunkm' data as well as areas where numerous complaints have been received. m Older Areas —Areas within the community that are older and may be more suspect to illegal connections and/or have deteriorating sewer lines leading to storm water City ofoalmwnPark: wposSinspection Page 18Y5EHeim Ave., Ste. 100 Orange, CA 92865 Te!.:(714) 94O-01O0 Fax: (7i4)94O-07VO momw.infong.co a Commercial/Industrial Areas — Key development areas within the city that the connnnanciad or industrial users have h)stohod|v significant numbers of illegal connections or water quality concerns. ��ck�m���b��n�ains��ns��do~s��!!��d����d�e project scope objectives, and other pertinent project details. During this meeting, inspection criteria and parameters will be discussed and established for each of the various elements which will be incorporated into the work. /\bo, at such time infrastructure Engineers will prepare its proposed inspection checklist and forms. Infrastructure Engineers intends to meet and/or communicate with City Staff as necessary, to coordinate for the inspection. The inspector will determine priority areas and identify hot spots and visual screening as priority areas for potential illicit connection and/or discharges. Once areas are detarmined. inspection and visual observation will be conducted to identify illicit discharges within the site This inspection program is to monitor and report pollutant from non-storm water discharges to the MS4 system from industrial and connnnerdmi businesses through facility inspections. Inspection staff will perform n field research and visitation to document and verify existing conditions This includes visually identifying existing facilities of the site and field marking features. This effort will also entail review of drainage characteristics, surface BMPs features genera description of the site, recommendations to improve water quality, and other visual pollutant within the area during inspection. Inspection staff will typically inform or remind the facility owner or manager about the new storm water regulations and how tn prevent discharges to the storm drain system. At the conclusion of this task, u report will be compiled including documented findings and photographs during conduct of field inspection. 0 Inspector will visit to conduct visual inspection at the targeted/identified businesses and will review the business operation, maintenance and discharge practices. 0 The inspector will also conduct a visual inspection to evaluate potential pollutant and pollutant exposure impacts on the storm drain system from the businesses. Cxyo[ Baldwin Park: wroE5|xspection Page INrRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERS 18Y5EHeim Ave., Ste. 100 Orange, CA 92865 Te!.:(714) 94O-01O0 Fax: (7i4)94O-07VO momw.infong.co a Commercial/Industrial Areas — Key development areas within the city that the connnnanciad or industrial users have h)stohod|v significant numbers of illegal connections or water quality concerns. ��ck�m���b��n�ains��ns��do~s��!!��d����d�e project scope objectives, and other pertinent project details. During this meeting, inspection criteria and parameters will be discussed and established for each of the various elements which will be incorporated into the work. /\bo, at such time infrastructure Engineers will prepare its proposed inspection checklist and forms. Infrastructure Engineers intends to meet and/or communicate with City Staff as necessary, to coordinate for the inspection. The inspector will determine priority areas and identify hot spots and visual screening as priority areas for potential illicit connection and/or discharges. Once areas are detarmined. inspection and visual observation will be conducted to identify illicit discharges within the site This inspection program is to monitor and report pollutant from non-storm water discharges to the MS4 system from industrial and connnnerdmi businesses through facility inspections. Inspection staff will perform n field research and visitation to document and verify existing conditions This includes visually identifying existing facilities of the site and field marking features. This effort will also entail review of drainage characteristics, surface BMPs features genera description of the site, recommendations to improve water quality, and other visual pollutant within the area during inspection. Inspection staff will typically inform or remind the facility owner or manager about the new storm water regulations and how tn prevent discharges to the storm drain system. At the conclusion of this task, u report will be compiled including documented findings and photographs during conduct of field inspection. 0 Inspector will visit to conduct visual inspection at the targeted/identified businesses and will review the business operation, maintenance and discharge practices. 0 The inspector will also conduct a visual inspection to evaluate potential pollutant and pollutant exposure impacts on the storm drain system from the businesses. Cxyo[ Baldwin Park: wroE5|xspection Page 1BY5E Heim Avo,St�1OU INFRASTRUCTURE Orange, CA 92865 ENGINEERS Tei:(714)940'01VO Fax: (714)94V'8T0n mxww.infong.no 0 The Inspection staff will inform or remind the facility owner or manager of business about the new storm vvzcer regulations and huvv no prevent discharges to the storm drain system. The Infrastructure Engineering inspection staff will walk the facility, note the site conditions, take photos and document ocher field conditions that are note-- WO-1-thy. Inspection staff will document the observed conditions of the relevant infrastructure and create an inspection report for the facility. Upon conncJedun of the field inspection, the inspector will complete the field form. This data will be incorporated into a final report for each site inspected. Additional Services Services, which are not specifically identified herein as services to be performed by infrastructure Engineers or its sub-consultants are considered "Additional Services" for purposes of this Agreement. If nddidonal services are determined to be required ' City of Baldwin Park and/or the governing authorities, then Infrastructure Engineers will assess the requirements and provide the City with the anticipated fee & time associated for review & approval prior to commencement these activities. Assumptions Consultant's obligations areboseduponthefoUovvngunderstunding: 1. Client will obtain any needed absorption and hazardous chemical test & reports. Specific Exclusions Consultant's obligations are based upon the following understanding: |. City will provide the Right of Entry and Inspection nudficudun |etter. Z City will provide any needed Environmental Studies including laboratory tests. 3. Sampling of suspicious nnutehaJm are excluded. 4. In case of need' the City will provide the Los Angeles County Flood Control District Permit. 5. Preparation of the Annual report to the State YVmu*r Quality Control Board. City of Baldwin Park: Npos3|nspection Page 18M5E. Heim Ave, Ste. 1DO Orange, CA 92865 TeL (714) 940-0100 Fax: (T14)94O-07O0 We are estimating that our fees will beat SO%of the current County of Los Angeles Fees for providing similar services which for each property inspected will range from $88 to $106. We have assumed that cost of mailing of the notices and invoices to the property owners will be paid for bythe City. Thank you for the opportunity tobeof service. Kindly contact rna with any questions. Raymond R. /\boxs. P.E, T.E. Q5[\ Project Manager City ofgomw/n Park: wpDBInspection Page ITEM NO. SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A 3 -PARTY AGREEMENT BETWEEN FITNESS INTERNATIONAL, LLC, MIG, INC., AND THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK FOR CEQA AND PLANNING RELATED SERVICES FOR A PROPOSED 45,000 S.F. LA FITNESS AND 9,000 S.F. to tAIL/RES AUicANT BUILDING AT 13822 -13916 GARVEY AVENUE (OVAL SITE) SUMMARY This report requests City Council approval of a 3 -party Agreement between Fitness International, LLC, MIG, Inc., and the City of Baldwin Park. MIG, Inc. is proposed to be contracted to prepare the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) paperwork and related staff reports associated with the entitlements for the proposed LA Fitness Gym (45,000 s.£) and 9,000 s.£ retail/restaurant building located at the Oval Site (13822- 13916 Garvey Avenue). This item was continued from the City Council meeting of October 1, 2014. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund as the fees cover the City's costs. LEGAL REVIEW The City Attorney has reviewed the 3 -Party Agreement and it has been approved as to form and content. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the 3 -Party Agreement and direct the Mayor to sign the Agreement between Fitness International, LLC, MIG, Inc., and the City of Baldwin Park. _ttT:tl7:Zllil►117 Fitness International, LLC, is currently in Design Review for a proposed 45,000 s.£ LA Fitness Gym (Private Recreational Facility —as stated in the City's Zoning Code) and a 9,000 s.f. retail /restaurant pad proposed for the properties located at 13822 -13916 Garvey Avenue. Through the Design Review process it has been determined that the following entitlements are necessary to approve the project: 1) Conditional Use Permit to allow a private recreational facility within the Freeway Commercial Sierra Vista Overlay Zone; and 2) Development Plan, required for development within the Sierra Vista Overlay Zone; and 3 -Party Agreement City, MIG/Hogle- Ireland, Inc. and Fitness International, LLC Page 2 3) Zone Variance as the result of lot line movement which will result in lots that are less than the minimum required four (4) acres and have less than the minimum required lot dimensions; and 4) Parcel Map required for the lot line movement; and 5) Street Vacation that is identified on the parcel map, which will modify the intersection of Garvey Avenue and Francisquito Avenue and bring the intersection to acceptable standards as shown in the handbook for the design of traffic intersections. In addition because the project is considered a discretionary project, the project is subject to the California EnviLrnnymentnl (lµality 4 of t En A0 o -,rl will ,+ * r'tigr ,� Declaration la c Environmental .� "11a `VV'u, UL a lilinilil util, require a 1V1ILI�'QteU LGG1Q.l atlVll Ul �IlVli orilIlental Impact. In order to facilitate this project within the time frame as needed by Fitness International, LLC, they have agreed to hire MIG /Hogle- Ireland, Inc. to prepare the related CEQA documentation in addition to the Planning Commission and requisite staff reports for the above listed entitlements for public hearing purposes. Additionally, Fitness International, LLC, will pay for the consultant's work in addition to the City's 15% administration fee. In the attached 3 -Party Agreement, each entity has the following responsibilities: 1) City's Responsibility: Prepare, post, and mail public hearing notices, review consultants work product, monitor contract, and pay invoices submitted by consultant pursuant to 3- Party Agreement. 2) Developer's Responsibility: Payment as stipulated in 3 -Party Agreement to the City, in the amount of $37,500.00 and review of work product and invoices submitted by consultant. 3) Consultant's Responsibility: See Attachment #2 for specific details. ALTERNATIVES There are no viable alternatives to not approving this agreement. Since Planning Division Staff does not have the level of expertise required to prepare defensible CEQA documentation, and such documentation is routinely contracted out to qualified consulting firms. ATTACHMENTS #1, 3 -Party Agreement #2, Proposal from MIG /Hogle- Ireland, Inc. C:\Amy\AMY\WORD \Reports \Council Reports \3 -party Agreement LA Fitness #3.doc r i la" C:\Amy\AMY\WORD \Reports \Council Reports\3 -party Agreement LA Fitness #3.doc THREE-PARTY CONSULTANT AGREEMENT This three-party agreement (hereinafter referred to as this "Agreement") is made and entered into by and among the City of Baldwin Park, a municipal corporation, (hereinafter referred to as "CITY"), Fitness International, LLC, a Limited Liability Company (hereinafter referred to as "DEVELOPER") and MIG, Inc. (hereinafter kh — e k referred to as "CONSULTANT"). (Hereinafter, CITY, DETELOPER an*- CONSULTANT are also referred to individually as "Party" or collectively as "Parties.") WHEREAS, DEVELOPER seeks to construct a 45,000 s.f. private recreational facility (LA Fitness) and a 9,000 s.f. retail/restaurant building on an approximately four (4) acre, vacant, oval shaped property identified by Los Angeles County Assessor's Parcel Numbers 8555-018-002 and 8555-018-003 adjacent to the 1-10, San Bernardino WHEREAS, DEVELOPER seeks the following entitlements for the proposed construction of a private recreational facility and restaurant/retail building: (1) Development Plan in accordance with Section 153.090.030 of the City's Municipal Code; (2) conditional use permit for a private recreational facility within the FC(SV), Freeway Commercial Sierra Vista Overlay zone; (3) zone variance to create lots that do not meet the minimum four acre minimum and that do not meet the minimum width 2100 "M =I[ IIIIJ1I1!11I11I 11 J the existing lot line; (5) public right of way vacation for the Garvey Avenue/Francisquito I EMN I I III I ("CEQA") documentation relevant to the above said entitlements (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT"); WHEREAS, in order for CITY to be able to review and proceed with al' necessary actions required as a result of the PROJECT, CITY has determined an NMI related consultant services to review and process said CEQA documentation and entitlements for the PROJECT. DEVELOPER has agreed to pay for the Services; r-- A C rderstand 11,;S A greement does not commit CITY 'to I Ll Ilu I U Ll 11 f-x�j IL %�11 L In H E: R L-1 the parties u approve the PROJECT, WHEREAS, CITY desires to contract with CONSULTANT to conduct the Services, as described in this Agreement and DEVELOPER desires to join in this Agreement to agree to pay CONSULTANT and CITY for such Services. 219ITNTMOMMIRM CONSULTANT shall provide all the professional work (i) necessary for the satisfactory completion of the Services, as described in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated herein, and (ii) related to the PROJECT as reasonably needed and requested by CITY'S Community Development Director, or his/her designee. The requested work shall be deemed part of the Services (the above described scope of services shall be referred to herein as the "Services"). CITY retains full authority and discretion to review and approve, conditionally approve or deny the PROJECI IVA 2. - ---TERM,-OF AGREEMENT. The Services shall be provided during the term of this Agreement which shall begin on the Effective Date, as defined in Paragraph 19 of this Agreement, and end not later than twelve (12) months (one calendar year) after the Commencement Date (as defined in Exhibit B), unless otherwise terminated or the time is extended consistent with the provisions of this Agreement (the "Term"). After consultation with DEVELOPER, the Term may be extended by letter in the reasonable discretion of U CITY" Community Development Director orhisih-er designee, or by formal amendment I I T --s ! u U to this Agreement executed by the Parties. CONSULTANT acknowledges and agrees the twelve (12) months, one calendar year term, is an estimate only and CITY desires the Services be completed in a diligent and expeditious manner as soon as possible after the Commencement Date. PIR • �i STEVEN= , I I • I I I I' � I I immediately supervised by Laura Stetson, AICP, Principal with MIG, Inc. who shall act as CONSULTANT'S representative. Any change in CONSULTANT'S representative his/her designee, which approval shall be made in his/her sole discretion. to as "Not-to-Exceed Fee"); provided, that the Parties understand and agree CITY shall N have-no obligation to pay CONSULTANT unless CITY has received from-DEVELOPER sufficient funds to make any payment to CONSULTANT. Such fee shall not be exceeded without the express prior written consent of CITY'S Community Development Director, or his/her designee, after consultation with DEVELOPER. In addition, CITY shall charge DEVELOPER an administrative oversight fee of Seven thousand five hundred dollars and no cents ($7,500.00) if CONSULTANT does not exceed the Not-to-Exceed Fee (hereinafter referred to as "Minimum Administrative / 1-1 r_- n / \ CONSULTANT'S total cost if Oversight Fee") or twenty -five percent k/-070) of CONOU It-\ I CONSULTANT exceeds the Not-to-Exceed Fee ("Exceeded Administrative Oversight Fee"). DEVELOPER shall pay to CITY, within five (5) days following the execution of this Agreement, the Not-to-Exceed Fee and the Minimum Administrative Oversight Fee together totaling thirty-seven thousand five hundred dollars and no cents ($37,500.00) (herein referred to as the "Contract Price"). In the event the CONSULTANT'S total fee exceeds the Not-to-Exceed Fee ("Exceeded Fee"), DEVELOPER shall pay to City the difference between the Not-to-Exceed Fee and the Exceeded Fee and the difference between the Minimum Oversight Fee and the Exceeded Administrative Oversight Fee. DEVELOPER acknowledges CITY will not authorize CONSULTANT to proceed under this Agreement until DEVELOPER has paid CITY the Contract Price. 5. PAYMENT SCHEDULE CONSULTANT shall submit invoices for work satisfactorily rendered to CITY. CONSULTANT shall submit invoices to CITY on a monthly basis, which shall contain a reasonably detailed statement of each task for which work was performed, the number M -1 of hours- -for -such task, the professional who performed the task, his--or her-hourly rate - and the cost of materials. Prior to paying CONSULTANT any such cost or expense for Services, CITY shall provide DEVELOPER a copy of the invoice for its review. DEVELOPER shall have the right to object to the payment of any invoice by written notice to CITY'S Community Development Director delivered within ten (10) days after delivery of the subject invoice to DEVELOPER. The Community Development Director shall at his sole disCIR---tiOni determine if such objection is 1Ainrrnn+nrJ or not and rikla, nnfir-&-a to V."J I _R 1— -1 give - , . - .-- DEVELOPER of his decision. Those invoices not objected to by DEVELOPER within ten (10) days after delivery of the subject invoice shall be deemed approved by DEVELOPER and may be paid by CITY. Each invoice shall be paid by CITY within thirty (30) days after approval from CITY provided DEVELOPER provides payment to CITY of invoice. In the event CITY determines additional services, not covered by Services described in Exhibit "A" are needed for the PROJECT, then CITY shall consult with services unless DEVELOPER has agreed to pay for the additional services in writing, CONSULTANT shall protect, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless q.ttorneys and employees (hereinafter referred to collectively as "INDEMNIFIED M PARTIES",) from any and- all claims,- liabilities, expenses-, -or dam-ages, including reasonable attorney fees and costs, for injury to or death of any person, and for injury to any property, including consequential damages, to the extent caused by the negligent performance of this Agreement, by or on behalf of CONSULTANT; provided, that CONSULTANT'S obligation to indemnify hold harmless and defend shall only be to the extent CONSULTANT or its employees, agents or officers causes the damages. The obligation to indemnify, hold harmless and defend does not apply to claims, liabilities, expenses or damages caused by the CI T Y or D'FE'VE-LOPER. CITY does not, and shall not, waive any rights against CONSULTANT because of the acceptance by CITY of the insurance policies described in this Agreement. In the event any of INDEMNIFIED PARTIES are sued by a third party for damages caused or allegedly caused by negligent or other wrongful conduct of CONSULTANT or its employees, agents or officers, CONSULTANT shall not be relieved of its indemnity obligation to INDEMNIFIED PARTIES by any settlement with any such third party unless that settlement includes a full release and dismissal of all claims by the third party against INDEMNIFIED PARTIES. 8. INSURANCE Without limiting its obligations pursuant to Paragraph 7, CONSULTANT shall name INDEMNIFIED PARTIES as additional insureds on the policies listed in subparagraphs (b) and (c), below, and shall obtain and maintain during the life of this Agreement all of the following insurance coverages: (a) Professional/negligent acts, errors and omissions insurance in an amount of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00); 110 (b) Comprehensive general liability in the amount of - One Million Dollars M.N.M. I 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11111 1 1 1 111 � I I I Ir I � 111111 161 Ill I • I r. (c) Automobile liability for owned, hired, and non-owned vehicles in the 1 Jill l� 111 A Certificate of Insurance for all the foregoing policies and an Additional Insured Endorsement for the general liability policy signed by CONSULTANT'S insurance AL4. carrier in a form approved by CI T Y'S City, MLLOrney must be provided prior to payment of the Contract Price pursuant to this Agreement. ;lIl il � �iI�j 111 11,17110"Imilil 1111,66 ill III I �iii F-„,1�14 In addition to the insurance coverage in Paragraph 8 above, CONSULTANT shall obtain and maintain, during the life of this Agreement, Workers' Compensation Insurance in the statutorily required amounts. Neither the failure of CONSULTANT to supply specified insurance policies and coverage, nor the failure of CITY to approve the same, shall alter or invalidate the provisions of Paragraph 7 of this Agreement. No assignment by CONSULTANT of this Agreement will be recognized by CITY and DEVELOPER unless such assignment has prior written approval of CITY and DEVELOPER. Any assignment without such consent shall be voidable and shall, at CITY • DEVELOPER may terminate this Agreement at any time • giving tht, other party ten-working days' (1 0-working days') prior notice in writing to all the Parties; -7- provided, -that CONSULTANT is entitled to payment -for Services -satisfactorily - rendered prior to such termination based on time and materials actually expended, subject to the provisions of Paragraph 4 of this Agreement- Except to the extent expressly provided herein, this Agreement, and the provisions contained herein, may not be altered, changed • amended, except • mutual consent of the Parties, in writing and signed by all Parties. W7115 MPWTRM�� At all times during the performance of this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall be an independent contractor of CITY, and shall not be (nor hold its employees, agents or officers out to be) employees, officers or agents of CITY or DEVELOPER. CONSULTANT shall at its own expense secure and be responsible for any and all payments of Income Taxes, Social Security, State Disability Insurance Compensation, Unemployment Compensation, and all other payroll deductions required of CONSULTANT and its officers, agents and employees and penalties assessed for non- payment of the same. If any clause, provision or section of this Agreement shall be ruled invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, then the invalidity of such clause, provision or section shall not affect any of the remaining provisions hereof. mw V Ili 11 This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of 'the State of California. The Parties agree to be bound by all federal, state and In - local laws, ordinances, regulations and directives- pertaining to the Services-. - If litigation-- arises out of this Agreement, then venue shall be the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Waiver by CITY or DEVELOPER of any breach of any term, covenant or condition herein contained shall not be deemed a waiver of such terms, covenant or condition or any subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant or condition herein contained. This Agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between the Parties for the Services and supersedes any and all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, either oral or written. Without prior written approval from CITY, CONSULTANT shall not provide any information, data or exhibits prepared or assembled by CONSULTANT in connection with the performance of its services pursuant to this Agreement to any person other than CITY. All such reports, information, data, and exhibits shall be the property of CITY. Upon demand, the original documents shall be delivered to CITY and a copy shall be delivered to DEVELOPER without additional cost or expense to CITY or DEVELOPER. CONSULTANT shall have the right to retain copies of CONSULTANT'S work upon completion of CONSULTANT'S services pursuant to this Agreement. All MINNOW4 III I I III RON 11 of 9 M 19. EFFECTIVE ATE® The effective date of this Agreement is the date it is signed on behalf of CITY (herein referred to as "Effective Date") This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same Agreement. Dated: *= 4 M Greg Gill, Senior Vice President Development Fitness International, LLC IMS-13TIMIN"111 in Daniel lacofano, CEO MIG, Inc. CITY: THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, a municipal corporation Dated: By: M �,m � - -1. May 22, 2014 Mike Calahan RM Calahan Consultants, LLC 22022 Oak Grove iviission Viejo, California 02002 Subject: Proposal to Assist with Case Processing and Prepare initial Study for to Fitness Baldwin Park, California Dear Mr, Calahan: MIGIHogle- freland is pleased to submit this proposal to provide case processing and CEQA services related to pending applications for a proposed new LA Fitness located at 13822/13916 Garvey Avenue in Baldwin Park. We have prepared this proposal based on review of the LAF Project Introduction PowerPoint presentation, discussions with you, and a conversation with Amy Harbin, the City Planner in Baldwin Park. The budget presented in this proposal includes: 1) assisting City staff with case processing and 2) completing the Initial Study and (Mitigated) Negative Declaration to comply with CEQA- hh'e will work closely with City staff to ensure a thorough and efficient application processing and environmental review process. As part of our scope of services to provide case processing assistance, we will assist staff with Design Review Committee review of proposed project plans and will draft staff reports for hearings associated with the proposed project. Case processing services are proposed to be completed on a time -and- materials basis, not to exceed $10,000. The Initial Study scope, outlined in detail on the following pages, includes preparation of an air quality /greenhouse gas assessment, preparation of notices, circulation of the document for public review, and responses to public comments (as necessary). We proposed to complete the initial Study tasks for a fixed fee of $20,000, including public hearings. For both tasks, we assume that base maps, information on existing conditions, speck project characteristics, technical studies, and other pertinent information that has yet to be provided will be forwarded to us as it becomes available. We have reviewed the proposed three -party contract provided to you by the City of Baldwin Park. If we are selected to assist with this work, we would request the modifications to the indernnmcation language shown on the attached pages. Array Harbin has been copied on this proposal to allow the City to consider these modifications quickly. PLC" T?t t4 Ej I D = S.I- GfQ'J.�ot[MUNICATI O� N51 MANAG ciii -N l T� { ';�i. L. i3%. �6V•(� r�,4?z�fiFc3�3:J� i P4�s5"syL?�, C,4CiF"7t :�!=� ! PHGtti €•7>2b- ;`�t'� -�� ?2 I >= Fx'•G2�- i4- ��73. I ac:,Nt,z^ic,��zit.�rr LA Fitness Baldwin Park Staff Services and Initial Study Proposal if you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me or Genevieve Sharrow at (626)744-9872. Thank you once again for the opportunity to work with LA Fitness toward successful project approval. Rega rds, Laura R- Stetson., AiCP Principal cc: Amy Harbin, City of Baldwin Park 2 Proposal for LA Fitness Baldwin Park Case Processing and Initial Study /(Mitigated) Negative Declaration Project Understanding I A Fitness proposes to construct a new two-story, 45,DOG- square -foot health club on approximately 5.19 acres at 13822 /13515 Garveylvvenue, Baldwin park, Cal forma. The protect r.. includes construction or one health club and a '9,CG1&- square -fact restaurant /retail bur :dir?a. The project would also include the preparation of a Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide the parcel into two parcels (one for the IA Fitness building and one forthe restaurant)_ We understand that project applications (TPM, Design Review, Development Application, and CUP) have been submitted to the City. We understand that a traffic study, environmental site assessment, and geotechnical investigation /soils report have been completed or are in the process of being completed. Given that the adjacent use is a residential development, we have included a noise screening analysis data (as opposed to a noise study). We believe project noise generation will not be substantial in comparison to the nearby freeway. This proposal includes preparation of an air quality and climate change technical memorandum to support preparation of the CEQA document_ Scope of Services Task 1: Case Processing Task 1.1: DRC Review MIG(Hogle- Ireland will review the project plans in consultation with City staff. M[G1Hogle- ireland will consolidate comments received from other departments participating in the Design Review Committee. Deliverables Consolidated Design Review Comments from City Departments (Electronic Copy) Task 1e2: Staff Report Preparation MiG)Hogle- Ireland will prepare staff reports for the Planning Commission and City Council hearings to consider the proposed project. MiG i Hogle- Ireland will respond to one round of City comments on the administrative draft staff reports. Defiverables Staff Reports (one each for Planning Commission and City Council Bearings - electronic) 1 LA Fitness Baldwin Pork Staff Services and Initial Study Proposal Task 2: Initial Study Task 2.1: Technical Review MiG I Hogle- Ireland will review the project plans to determine adequacy in providing the information necessary to complete the initial Study. We will also review all technical studies prepared for the project to determine adequacy in meeting CEQA requirements as substantial evidence. The project applicant shah provide ail documentation available regarui<<r, ii- �r superfund site .status,, letters from the I_os, Angeles County Fire Department regarding site conditions, Phase I environmental assessment, geotechnical studies, and any other pertinent information. MiGiHogl&4reland will prepare a memorandum identifying any deficiencies fOURri in the technical review and will request any additional information needed to complete the initial Study. Deliverobles Technical Review Memorandum, as necessary {electronic} Task 2.2: Initial Study This proposal assumes that the Initial Study will support adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. We also assume that suitable electronic and printed base maps, along with any additional information and clarifications concerning the specific operational characteristics of the project, will be readily available from the applicant, if they have not already been provided. It is further assumed that sufficient information concerning the local water, sewer, and storm drainage systems and local public services can be provided by City staff in response to our inquiries. MIG I Hogle-Ireland will coordinate with the City to confirm and refine the project description. We will then prepare a fully annotated Initial Study checklist, with explanatory responses to the 80+ questions, sufficient to analyze the environmental effects of the project. Copies of the completed Initial Study will be submitted for review and comment by City staff. Please note that any changes to the project after completion of the project description could require schedule and budget adjustments to incorporate the changes into the Initial Study. MIG I Hogle- Ireland will respond to one round of client and Crty comments on the administrative draft initial Study before finalizing the draft for public review and comment. MIG I Hogle- Ireland will prepare the Notice of Intent (NO[) for distribution with the draft Initial Study and for public circulation pursuant to the City's standard environmental review process. MIGIHogle- Ireland will circulate the draft Initial Study to public agencies, special interest groups, and the City's standard distribution listforthe minimum 30-day review period. MIGIHogie- Ireland will deliver the NOI to the Los Angeles County Clerk for posting. The City /project applicant will be responsible for placing and paying for newspaper ads and paying all required firing fees. The City will be responsible for posting notices where City notices are regularly advertised. At the conclusion of the public review and Comment period, MIGiHogle- Ireland will prepare written responses to comments concerning the adequacy of the environmental impact analysis, if necessary. Individual responses will be at the discretion of the City. if minor revis €ons, 2 fA Fitness Baidwin Park Staff Services and Initial Study Proposal corrections, or clarifications to the Initial Study are warranted, we would make those changes and compile a final initial Study for adoption by the City's decision- makers. We will also prepare a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program pursuant to Section 15997 of the CEQA Guidelines. We will prepare a Notice of Determination pursuant to Section 15975 of the CEQA Guidelines and deliver it to the Los Angeles County Clerk for posting within five days of final City action on the application. Deliverables 1 Screencheck initial Study (electronic) 1 Public Review Initial Study (electronic) 20 Public Review Initial Study (CDs) 1 NOI (electronic) 20 NOI {printed) 1 MMRP (electronic) 1 NOD (printed and electronic) Task 2.3: Air Quaf'rty and Climate Change Analysis Short- and long -term air pollutant and greenhouse gas emissions will be modeled and analyzed utilizing guidance provided in the South Coast Air Quality Management District ( SCAQMD) CEQA Air Quality Handbook. Construction and demolition emissions of criteria pollutants will be quantified utilizing the latest version of the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod). This task includes analysis of consistency with the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP), screening of potential carbon monoxide hotspots, and odors. This task assumes that computer modeling of carbon monoxide emissions for hotspots analysis or other toxic emissions will not be required. All emissions will be analyzed based on thresholds established by SCAQMD to determine if any significant impacts will occur. Deliverables Air Quality Climate Change Technical Memorandum (electronic) Budget and Schedule Billing for the case processing task will be on a time- and - materials basis. Billing for the CEQA documentation will on an overall percent complete basis. We will invoice monthly. Payments are due and payable within 39 days of invoice. As the project progresses, if there is a change in scope or additional time and efforts are needed, an amendment to the Budget will be requested before proceeding. With regard to the schedule, we are available to get underway immediately and work expeditiously. We have staff available to devote the resources needed. E LA Fitness Baldwin Park Stcrjf Services and Initial Study Proposal Initial Application I- Case Processing and Staff Reports —Review Application, Consolidate Staff Comments, Complete Staff Report (includes meetings with 2. Prepare hil-Lia! study-AtIvIII-Ligated) Negative Derlar�bidri. ([S/tOND),. AirQua1'jty/GHG Report, Notice of Intent, Notice of Determination, MMRP, and eirculaiLe CEQA document 4. Public Hearings (2) TOTAL 18 $10,DOD I PRINCIPAL AREAS OF EXPERTISE General Plans i Land Use Planning / Zoning Codes Specific Plans I Meeting Facilitation EDUCATION Laura Stetson is an MIG Principal with over 26 years experience in the area of general plans, zoning codes, specific plans, and special planning studies for diverse cities throughout California. Ms. Stetson has worked with advisory committees, commissions, and councils to develop long -range goals, policies, and programs, and to craft the regulatory tools to implementthose programs. She has conducted background research for planning, written plan elements, coordinated preparation of plans and related environmental documentation, and presented recom- mendations to decision- making bodies. She also directs preparation of CE01A documents, either as part of planning programs or to address development projects. Ms. Stetson led a team of specialists to prepare the City of Riverside's key land use regulatory tools: the General Plan, the zoning ordinance, the subdivision ordinance, and citywide Design Guidelines, as well as a Program EIR. The program involved working with many community groups to affirm direction defined through a prior visioning process .and economic strategy study. As part of crafting a vision for the City of Claremontthat was to be integrated into the General Plan, Ms. Stetson led a multi - layered public involvement program, including working with a 100 plus member General Plan Committee With topic - oriented subcommittees. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATiONS . American Planning Association Califomia Planning Roundtable EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Stanford University Graduate CoursevforL in Public Adrninistration, American University RELEVANT EXPERIENCE a Redwood City General Plan Update, Redwood City, California ® Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update, Rancho Cucamonga, California Torrance General Plan Update, Torrance, Califomia Long Beach General Plan Land Use Element, Long Beach, California o Long Beach Comprehensive Zoning Code Update, Long Beach, California v Manhattan Beach General Plan, Manhattan Beach, California M Rialto General Plan, Rialto, California 6 Brea General Plan, Brea, California Pasadena Land Use and Mobility Element, Pasadena, California Rosedale Planned Community EIR, Azusa, California Del Mar Station Mixed Use EIR, Del Mar, Califomia ® La Mirada Zoning Code, La Mirada, California PROJECT AWARDS v Brea General Plan American Planning Association Award, Califamia Chapter Redwood City General Plan American Planning Association, California Chapter, Outstanding Achievement for Small Jurisdiction Planning Effort a riverside General Plan American Planning Association Award, California Chapter s 0aremont General Han American Planning Association Award, California Chapter Christopher Brown DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES AREAS OF EXPERTISE Environmental .Analysis / Air Quality and Climate Change Analysis ailALI FICATIONS Mr. Brown is the Director of Environmental Services for MIG 1 Hogle- Ireland's Environmental Planning section. He has prepared numerous environmental documents pursuant to CEQA and NEPA for jurisdictions throu ghout Southern California. Mr. Brown is skilled in conducting assessments for a variety of development projects and comprehensive plans, including institutional projects for school districts, religious facilities, and cities. Mr. Brown has prepared numerous air quality assessments utilizing the latest CalEEMod software for a va riety of development and infrastructure projects and is experienced in assessing local and regional emissions impacts, carbon dioxide'hotspot' screening and analysis using CAL-NE4and EMFAC, and toxic air contaminant risks arid modeling using AERMOD. He has prepared GHG emissions models utilizing the methods and practices presented in the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association's CEQA and Climate Change white paper and their Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures guidelines. In addition to his environmental experience, Mr. Brown has provided contract land use planning servi cesfor public agencies such as the cities of Desert Hot Springs, Palm Springs, and Twentynine Palms. Mr. Brow n also served as the City of Rancho Santa Margarita's code enforcement officer and NPDES Authorized inspector. t EDUCATION ® Bachelors in Environmental Planning, California State University, Northridge ARB1 90 Air Quality Academy ARB 511 Diesel Exhaust After Treatment Devices EPA 422 Air Pollution Control Orientation AFFILIATIONS 0 Association of Environmental Professionals (AEP) RELEVANT EXPERIENCE City of Rialto General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report e Huntington Beach Circulation Element Program Environmental Impact Report * City of Rosemead General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report Oro Grand Schooi Dis'trictjunior high, high school, and college campus fadlities IS /MND (182,480 square feet of school facilities) w Claremont University Consortium East Campus EIR (80- acre sports complex) s Jeffries Road Affordable Housing project IS /MND (54 -unit, 100 percent affordable housing complex; included preparation of air quality and climate change assessments) a Redlands Pioneer Business Center IS/MND (1.3 million. - square400t distribution warehouse; included preparation of air quality and dimate change assessments) o S at`ron Square Transit Village Specific Plan, Phase II IS /MN D (M—I A Operations and Maintenance facility on 27 acres) e Jones Industrial Building (8,863- square -foot industrial building and staging yard, included air quality assessment) a Desert Hot Springs I -10 Community Annexation, lS /ND (4,0D0 -ace annexation) � Christian Center, Desert Hot Springs AREKS OF EXPERTISE General Plans / Housing FJements Zoning Ordinances / Environmental Analysis aUALIFiCATION", Ms, Sharrow provides a broad range of planning and planning related services to clients. Her primary respon- sibilities include preparing environmental documents pursuant to CEOA (IS /MNDs, E1RS, Addendums) and long - range planning documents such as General Plans, Zoning Ordinances, and HUD compliance documents (Consolidated Plans, Action Plans, and Analyses of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice). Her CEQA experience spans diverse projects, at a variety of analysis levels. She excels at completing succinct, thoroughly researched and defensible environmental reviewfor both development and program -level projects. Ms. Sharrow has prepared air quality and greenhouse gas emissions assessments utilizing the latest Cal EEMod software and is well - versed in the latest developments related to climate change. Ms. Sharrow has experience with public participation and outreach as an integral component of projects, especially as related to General Plans and HUD compliance documents. Ms. Sharrow has led facilitated discussions with stake- holders, holders, conducted one -on -one interviews, participated in large open -house meetings with community members, created and administered surveys, and given presenta- tionsfor interest groups, Planning Commissions, and City Cou n6is. In prior positions before joining MIG I Hogle- Ireland, Ms. Sharrow worked with underserved populations at a domestic violence shelter and assisted with development of an outreach program related to sustainable developmentfor a local jurisdiction. EDUCATION M-A., Urban Planning University of California, Los Angeles s EA., Social Anthropology University of Michigan RELEVANT EXPERIENCE • Vernon General Plan Update EIR, Uemon, Calimmia • Rosemead General Plan EIR, Rosemead, California * Garden Grove Housing Element, Garden Grove, California * Loma Linda Housing Element Update, Loma Linda, California ® Initial Stu dies /(M)NDs /Addendums toEIRs for Zoning Amendments in, Baldwin Park, Duarte, Monterey Park„ Gar- den Grove, and Redwood City, California e Initial Studies /(M)NDs for Housing Elements in Azusa, West Covina, and Baldwin Parts, California & initial Studies /(M)NDs for proposed wireless telecommunica- tions facilities and a church in Monterey Park, Cafifomia Initial Studies/(M)NDs for proposed assisted living facilities in Sierra Madre and Whittier, California Initial Study!( vi)NDs for proposed ofnce building and health dub in West Covina, California Olivia Chan PROJECT ASSOCIATE AREAS OF EXPERTISE Environmental Analysis/ Air Quality and Climate Change Analysis QUALIFICATIONS Ms. Young is an assistant project manager in MIG Hogle - Ireland's Environmental Planning section. Olivia has prepared a variety of environmental documents such as Initial Studies, Mitigated Negative Declarations, Environmental impact Reports, and Mitigation Monitoring Programs pursuant to CEQA forjunsdictions throughout Southern California. Ms. Young has provided services in construction management fora large renewable energy transmission line project in Southern California. This entailed construction site monitoring, the preparation of mitigation plans, and documenting baseline conditions. In addition to her environmental experience, Ms. Young has assisted in the preparation of a specific plan for a 800-acre Master Planned Community in the City of Corona. Ms. Young has also provided demographics research and enrollment projection analysis for several school districts within California. These services allow school districts to better plan for the future in terms of facility and faculty needs. EDUCATION Masers in Urban and Regional Planning University of California, Irvine Bachelors in Environmental Analysis and Design University of California, Irvine EPA 400 and EAA 422 RELEVANT EXPERIENCE S Baldwin Park Housing Element lniiial Study /MND Garden Grove Housing Element Initial Study /MND City of Hawaiian Gardens Redevelopment EIR City of Colton General Plan Update EIR Whittier LA Fitness Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Decla- ration (38,DD0 square -foot health club) 0 Irvine Crossings Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration (addition of 173,774 square feet of additional office and reduction of 176,300 square feet of industrial use in existing building) Westside Lofts Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration (Mixed -Use Development) CONSULTANT will proceed with the Services pursuant to this Agreement within five (5) working days after receipt of written authorization from CITY (the "Commencement Date"). CONSULTANT acknowledges the twelve (12) month, one calendar year term to finish the Services is an estimate only. CONSULTANT shall in his best efforts in a diligent and expeditious matter to Complete the 'Services as soon as possible after the C-o-mmenGern-ent Date. C[ T,( and DEVELOPEER acknowledge t1he above are estimates on!,Y, - C:1AmyWMYWORD1Reports\Council Reportsl3 -party Agreement LA Fitness 93.doc agzat- z i May 22, 2014 Mike Calahan RM Calahan Consultants, LLC I 22022 (yak Grove C.f�iccirtin �Iiejn, i aiifa-srnia 92692 Subject: Proposal to Assist with Case processing and Prepare Initial Study for LA Fitness: Baldwin Park, California I Dear Mr. Calahan: i MiGIHogle- Ireland is pleased to submit this proposal to provide case processing and CEQA services related to pending applications for a proposed new LA Fitness located at 13822/13916 Garvey Avenue in Baldwin Park- We have prepared this proposal based on review of the iAF Project Introduction PowerPoint presentation, discussions with you, and a conversation with �. Amy Harbin, the City Planner in Baldwin Park. The budget presented in this proposal includes: 1} assisting City staff with case processing and 2) completing the Initial Study and (Mitigated) Negative Declaration to comply with CEOA. We will work closely with City staff to ensure a thorough and efficient application processing and environmental review process. As part of our scope of services to provide case processing assistance, we will assist staff with Design Review Committee review of proposed project plans and will draft staff reports for hearings associated with the proposed project. Case processing services are proposed to be completed on a time- and - materials basis, not to exceed $10,000. The Initial Study scope, outlined in detail on the following pages, includes preparation of an air quality /greenhouse gas assessment, preparation of notices, circulation of the document for t public review, and responses to public comments (as necessary). We proposed to complete the � initial Study tasks for a fixed fee of $20,000, including public hearings. For both tasks, we assume that base maps, information on existing conditions, specific project characteristics, technical studies, and other pertinent information that has yet to be provided will be forwarded to us as it becomes available. We have reviewed the proposed three -party contract provided to you by the City of Baldwin Park. If we are selected to assist with this work, we would request the modifications to the indemnification language shown on the attached pages. Amy Harbin has been copied on this proposal to allow the City to consider these modifications quickly. P L A V V- f N G b E'S. f G N z. �' 0 M M U N I t A'T 1 0: N C I M A N A G E M E N T I T F : H V L. C'.G .Y 6S -j,l Af, : -:VC -0 9VL E E f P.4S �Fi ,, C4L ?� F HONE- 626 - 74:4 -98 ?2 1 '•6lG -T :373. 1 ffynu have any questions or need additional information, please contact me or Genevieve Sharrnw at (626)744-9872. Thank you once again for the opportunity to work with LA Fitness toward successful project approval. Rega rds, jL' f Laura R. Stetson, AICP Phmi9a| cc: Amy Harbin, City of Baldwin Park M Proposal for iA Fitness Baldwin Park Case Processing and initial Studyl(Mitigated) Negative Declaration Project Understanding LA Fitness proposes to construct a new two - story, 45,000- square -foot health club on approximately 5.19 acres at pr v jU; L � vJr, includes construction of the health club and a 9,000 - square -foot restaurafit /retail iUildtn The project would also include the preparation of a Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide the parcel intotwo parcels (one forthe LA Fitness building and one forthe restaurant). We understand that project applications (TPM, Design Review, Development Application, and CUP) have been submitted to the Qty. We understand that a traffic study, environmental site assessment, and geotechnical investigation /soils report have been completed or are in the process of being completed. Given that the adjacent use is a residential development, we have included a noise screening analysis data (as opposed to a noise study). We believe project noise generation will not be substantial in comparison to the nearby freeway. This proposal includes preparation of an air quality and climate change technical memorandum to support preparation of the CEQA document Scope of Services Task 2: Case Processing Task 1.1: DRC Review MIG(Hogle- Ireland will review the project plans in consultation with City staff_ MIG(Hogle- Ireland will consolidate comments received from other departments participating in the Design j Review Committee. s Deliverables Consolidated Design Review Comments from Qty Departments (Electronic Copy) Task 1.2: Staff Report Preparation MIGIHogle- Ireland will prepare staff reports for the Planning Commission and City Council hearings to consider the proposed project MiG ( Bogle- Ireland will respond to one round of City f comments on the administrative draft staff reports. Deliverables Staff Reports (one each for Planning Commission and City Council Hearings - electronic) 7 LA Fitness Baldwin Park Stcrff Services and Initial Study Proposal Task 2: Initial Study Task 2.1: Technical Review MIGIHogle- Ireland will review the project plants to determine adequacy in providing the information necessary to complete the Initial Study. We will also review all technical studies prepared for the project to determine adequacy in meeting CEQA requirements as substantial �____ I" �,p, -1 applicant sh-ii nrn4de ski rtnt^nmentation available re�ardina the EPA ev it_ e ice. !�fc ur v�cu y..�.�,.a _..... . .- _... _ ._ _ superf,ind site status, letters from? the Los: Angeles County Fire Department regarding site conditions, Phase € environmental assessment, geotechnical studies, and any other pertinent information. MIGIHogle- Ireland will prepare a memorandum identifying any deficiencies found in the technical review and will request any additional information needed to complete the initial Study. Deliverobles Technical Review Memorandum, as necessary (electronic) Task 2.2: Initial Study This proposal assumes that the initial Study will support adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. We also assume that suitable electronic and printed base maps, along with any additional information and clarifications concerning the specific operational characteristics of the project, will be readily available from the applicant, if they have not already been provided. It is further assumed that sufficient information concerning the local water, sewer, and storm drainage systems and local public services can be provided by City staff in response to our inquiries. MIDI Hogle -1 reland will coordinate with the City to confirm and refine the project description. We will then prepare a fully annotated Initial Study checklist, with explanatory responses to the 80+ questions, sufficient to analyze the environmental effects of the project. Copies of the completed Initial Study will be submitted for review and comment by City staff. Please note that any changes to the project after completion of the project description could require schedule and budget adjustments to incorporate the changes into the Initial Study. MIG I Hogle- Ireland will respond to one round of c€ient and City comments on the administrative draft initial Study before finalizing the draft for public review and commerit. MIG j Hogle- Ireland will prepare the Notice of Intent (NO[) for distribution with the draft Initial Study and for public circulation pursuant to the Crty's standard environmental review process. MIG I Hog €e - Ireland Will circulate the draft Initial Study to public agencies, special interest groups, and the City's standard distribution list for the minimum 30-day review period. MIG IHogle- Ireland will deliver the NOI to the Los Angeles County Clerk for posting. The City/project applicant will be responsible for placing and paying for newspaper ads and paying all required filing fees. The City will be responsible for posting notices where City notices are regularly advertised. At the conclusion of the public review and comment period, MIG I Hogle-Ireland will prepare written responses to comments concerning the adequacy of the environmental impact analysis, if necessary. Indiividual responses will be at the discretion of the City. If minor revisions, LA Fitness Baldwin Park Staff Services and Initial Study Proposal corrections, or clarifications to the Initial Study are warranted, we would make those changes and compile a final Initial Study for adoption by the ChLys decision- makers. We will also prepare a M€tigation Monitoring and Reporting Program pursuant to Section 15097 of the CEQA Guidelines. We will prepare a notice of Determination pursuant to Section 15075 of the CECtA Guidelines and deliver it to the Los Angeles County Clerk for posting within five days of final City action on the application. Deliverables 1 Screencheck Initial Study (electronic) 1 Public Review Initial Study (electronic) 20 Public Review Initial Study (CDs) 1 NOI (electronic) 20 NOI (printed) 1 MMRP (electronic) 1 NOD (printed and electronic) Task 2.3: Air Quality and Climate Change Analysis Short- and long -term air pollutant and greenhouse gas emissions will be modeled and analyzed utilizing guidance provided in the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) CEQA Air Quality Handbook- Construction and demolition emissions of criteria pollutants will be quantified utilizing the latest version of the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod)_ Tnis task includes analysis of consistency with the Air Quality Management Plan (A(XMr), screening of potential carbon monoxide hotspots, and odors. This task assumes that computer modeling of carbon monoxide emissions for hotspots analysis or other toxic emissions will not be required. All emissions will be analyzed based on thresholds established by SCAQMD to determine if any significant impacts will occur- Deliverables Air Quality Climate Change Technical Memorandum (electronic) Budget and Schedule Billing for the case processing task will be on a time - and - materials basis. Billing for the CEQA documentation will on an overall percent complete basis. We will invoice monthly. Payments are due and payable within 30 days of invoice. As the project progresses, if them is a change in scope or additional time and efforts are needed, an amendment to the budget will be requested before proceeding. With regard to the schedule, we are available to get underway immediately and work expeditiously. We have staff available to devote the resources needed. 9 LA Fitness Baldwin Park Staff Services and Initial Study Proposal lnitiaf Application i- Case Processing and St:Pff Reports — Review $10,00D Application, Consolidate Staff Comments, Complete Staff Reportt (includes meetings with applicant) "V� Z. Prepare initial Stud Y-AlVI jtigabEd) Nega"- - Declaration (IS/MINN, Air Qfj8l'q/GHG Notice oflntant, Notice of Determination, MMRP, and circulate CEQA document 4. Public Hearings (2) TOTAL $30,000 4 PRINCIPAL AREAS OF EXPERTISE General Plans / Land Use Planning / Zoning Codes Specific Plans / Meeting Facilitation EDUCATION Laura Stetson is an MIG Principal with over 26 years experience in the area of general plans, zoning codes, speci�ic plans; and special planning studies for diverse cities throughout California. Ms. Stetson has worked with advisory committees, commissions, and councils to develop long -range goals, policies, and programs, and to craft the regulatory tools to implement those programs. She has conducted background research for planning, written plan elements, coordinated preparation of plans and related environmental documentation, and presented recom- mendations to decision- making bodies. She also directs preparation of CEOA documents, either as part of planning programs or to address development projects. Ms. Stetson led a team of specialists to prepare the City of Riverside's key land use regulatory tools- the General Plan, the zoning ordinance, the subdivision ordinance, and citywide Design Guidelines, as well as a Program EIR. The program involved working with many community groups to affirm direction defined through a prior visioning process .and economic strategy study. As part of crafting a vision for the City of Claremont that was to be integrated into the General Plan, Ms. Stetson led a multi - layered public involvement program, including working with a 100 plus member General Plan Committee With topic- oriented subcommittees. EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Stanford University m Graduate Coursework in Public Administration, A nerican University RELEVANT EXPERIENCE a Redwood City General Plan Update, Redwood City, California g Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update, Rancho Cucamonga, California Torrance General Plan Update, Torrance, California Long Beach General Plan Land Use Element, Long Beach, California Long Beach Comprehensive Zoning Code Update, Long Beach, California Manhattan Beach General Plan, Manhaftan Beach, California * Rialto General Plan, Rialto, California r, Brea General Plan, Brea, California o Pasadena Land Use and Mobility Element, Pasadena, California Rosedale Planned Community EIR, Azusa, California Q Del Mar Station Mixed Use EIR, Del Mar, California La Mirada Zoning Code, La Mirada, Califomia PROJECT AWARDS • Brea General Nan American Planning Association Award, California Chapter • { &&wood City General Plan American Planning Association, California Chapter, PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Planning Achievement for Small Jurisdiction Planning Effort American Planning Assocoation _... €riverside General Plan Califomia Planning Roundtable American Planning Association Award, California Chapter Claremont General Plan American Planning Association Award, Califomia Chapter Christopher Brown DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ,AREAS OF EX, ERTISE Environmental Analysis/ Air Quality and Climate Change Analysis QUALIFICATIONS Mr. Brown is the Director of Environmental Services for MIG Hogle- Ireland's Environmental Planning section. He has prepared numerous environmental documents pursuant to CEQA and NEPA for jurisdictions throw Shout Southern California. Mr. Brown is spilled in conducting assessments for a variety of development projects and comprehensive plans, including institutional projects for school districts, religious Facilities, and cities. Mr. Brown has prepared numerous air quality assessments utilizing the latest CaIEEMod software for a variety of development and infrastructure projects and is experienced in assessing local and regional emissions impacts, carbon dioxide 'hotspot' screening and analysis using CALINE4 and EMFAC, and toxic air contaminant risks and modeling using AERMOD. He has prepared GHG emissions models utilizing the methods and practices presented in the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association's CEQA and Climate Change white paper and their Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures guidelines. In addition to his environmental experience, Mr. Brown has provided contract land use planning servi ces for public agencies such as the cities of Desert Hot Springs, Palm Springs, andTwenynine Palms. Mr. Brown also served as the City of Rancho Santa Margarita's code enforcement officer and NPDES Authorized Inspecto,_ EDUCATI014 Bachelors in Environmental Planning, California State University, Northridge AR °190 Air Quality Academy a ARB 511 Diesel Exhaust After Treatment Devices EPA 422 Air Pollution Control Orientation AFFILIATIONS Association of Environmental Professionals (PFP) RELEVANT EXPERIENCE City of Rialto General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report 9 Huntington Beach Circulation Element Program Environmental Impact Report * City of Rosemead General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report Oro Grand School District junior high, high school, and college campus facilities IS /WIND (182,480 square feet of school facilities) Claremont University Consortium East Campus EIR (8!J- acre sports complex) & Jeffries Road Affordable Housing project IS /MND (59 -unit, 100 percent affordable housing complex; included preparation of air quality and climate change assessments) Redlands Pioneer Business Center IS/MND (1.3 million - square foot distribution warehouse; included preparation of air quality and climate change assessments) o Stat on Square Transit Village Spedfi Plan, Phase 11 l5 /Iv1ND (MTA Operations and Maintenance facility on 27 acres) 6 Jones Industrial Building (8,863- square -foot industrial building and staging yard, included air quality assessment) * Desert Hot Springs 1 -10 Community Annexation IS /ND (4,000 -acre annexation) a Christian Center, Desert Hot Springs Genevieve Sharrow PROJECT ASSOCIATE AREAS OF EXPERTISE General Plans / Housing Elements Zoninq Ordinances / Environmental Analysis QUALIFICATIONS Ms. Sharrow provides a broad range of planning and planning related services to clients. Her primary respon- sibilities include preparing environmental documents pursuant to CECA (IS /MNDs, EIRS, Addendums) and long - range planning documents such as General Plans, Zoning Ordinances, and HUD compliance documents (Consolidated Plans, Action Plans, and Analyses of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice). Her CEQA experience spans diverse projects, at a variety of analysis levels. She excels at completing succinct, thorouahly researched and defensible environmental review for both development and program -level projects. Ms. Sharrow has prepared air quality and greenhouse gas emissions assessments utilizing the latest Cal EEMod software and is well- versed in the latest developments related to climate change_ Ms. Sharrow has experience with public participation and outreach as an integral component of projects, especially as relatedto General Plans and HUD compliance documents_ Ms. Sharrow has led facilitated discussions With stake- . holders, conducted one -on -one interviews, participated in large open -house meetings with community members, created and administered surveys, and given presenta- tionsfor interest groups, Planning Commissions, and City Cou ncils. In prior positions before joining MIG ( Hogle- Ireland, Ms. Sharrow worked with underserved populations at a domestic violence shelter and assisted with development of an outreach program related to sustainable developmentior a local jurisdiction. ��� I-sogf Lcelsr }d EDUCATION M.A., Urban Planning University of California, Los Angeles a BA., Social Anthropology University of Michigan RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Vernon General Plan Update EIR, Vernon, Califomia s Rosemead General Plan EIR, Rosemead, California Garden Grove Housing Element, Garden Grove, California • Loma Linda Housing Element Update, Loma Linda, California • Initial Studies / {M)NDs /Addendumsto EIRsforZoning Amendments in, Baldwin Park, Duarte, Monterey Park, Gar- den Grove, and Redwood City, California Initial Studies /(M)NDs for Housing Elements in Azusa, West Covina, and Baldwin Park, California a Initial Studies /(,M)NDs for proposed wireless telecommunica- tions facilities and a church in Monterey Park, California Initial Stidies/(M)NDs for proposed assisted living facilities in Sierra Madre and Whittier, California o Initial Study, 1)NDs for proposed office building a ^.d health dub in West Covina, California Olivia Chan PROJECT ASSOCIATE AREAS OF EXPERTISE Environmental Analysis/ Air Quality anri (-hmn;ta Change Analysis n- UAL[FICATJONS Ms. Young is an assistant project manager in MIG Hogle - Ireland's Environmental Planning section. Olivia has prepared a variety of environmental documents such as Initial Studies, Mitigated Negative Declarations, Environmental Impact Reports, and Mitigation Monitoring Programs pursuant to CEQA forjurisdictions throughout Southern California. Ms. Young has provided services in construction management for a large renewable energy transmission line project in Southern California. This entailed construction site monitoring, the preparation of mitigation plans, and documenting baseline conditions. In addition to her environmental experience, Ms. Young has assisted in the preparation of a specific plan for a 800-acre Master Planned Community in the City of Corona. Ms. Young has also provided demographics research and enrollment projection analysis for several school districts within California. These services allow school districts to better plan for the future in terms of facility and faculty needs, EDUCATIOiS e Masters in Urban and Regional Planning University Of California, Irvine e Bachelors in Environmental Analysis and Design University of California, Irvine e EPA 400 and E{AA 422 RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Baldwin Park Housing Element Initial Study /MND o Garden Grove Housing Element Initial Study /MND City of Hawaiian Gardens Redevelopment EIP, a Gty of Colton General Plan Update EIR Whittier LA Fitness Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Decla- ration (38,000 square -foot health club) * Irvine Crossings Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration (addition of 173,774 square feet- of additional office and reduction of 176,300 square feet of industrial use in existing building) Westside Lofts Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration (A /tixed -Use Development) Honorable Mayor and City Cow Daniel Wall, P.E., Director of Pu January 21, 2015 ITEM NO. Authorize Publication of Notice Inviting Bids for the construction of traffic signals at two intersections SUMMARY This will adopt the plans and specifications and authorize the publication of the Notice Inviting Bids for the construction of traffic signals at the intersection of Los Angeles Street and La Rica Avenue and at the intersection of Baldwin Park Boulevard and Ohio Street. FISCAL IMPACT This item will not impact the City's General Fund. At the February 19, 2014 meeting, the City Council appropriated $350,000 in Prop C funds for the design and construction of these traffic signals. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council: Adopt the plans and specifications for the construction of traffic signals at the intersection of Los Angeles Street and La Rica Avenue and at the intersection of Baldwin Park Boulevard and Ohio Street; and, 2. Authorize the publication of the Notice Inviting Bids for the construction of traffic signals at the intersection of Los Angeles Street and La Rica Avenue and at the intersection of Baldwin Park Boulevard and Ohio Street. BACKGROUND The intersections of Los Angeles Street at La Rica Avenue and Baldwin Park Boulevard at Ohio Street are non- signalized. Both intersections have stop signs for traffic entering the intersection from the minor streets, while the traffic on the major streets has no traffic control. Both intersections also have existing striped school crosswalks. Due to these factors and traffic counts obtained by City staff, both intersections meet the warrant thresholds for a traffic signal installation. At its regular meeting on February 19, 2014. The City Council authorized Minagar and Associates to prepare plans and specifications, and appropriated $350,000 in Prop C funds for the construction of these traffic signals. Upon receipt of responsive bids, City staff will make a recommendation to the City Council for award of the construction contract. LEGAL REVIEW None required ALTERNATIVES The City Council could choose not to go forward with inviting bids for the construction of these traffic signals. ATTACHMENTS None — The plans and specifications are available for inspection in the Office of the City Clerk. TO: FROM: JGABRIEL zoo DATE: SUBJECT: Honorable Mayor and City Cow Daniel Wall, P.E., Director of Pu January 21, 2015 ITEM NO. Authorize Publication of Notice Inviting Bids for the construction of traffic signals at two intersections SUMMARY This will adopt the plans and specifications and authorize the publication of the Notice Inviting Bids for the construction of traffic signals at the intersection of Los Angeles Street and La Rica Avenue and at the intersection of Baldwin Park Boulevard and Ohio Street. FISCAL IMPACT This item will not impact the City's General Fund. At the February 19, 2014 meeting, the City Council appropriated $350,000 in Prop C funds for the design and construction of these traffic signals. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council: Adopt the plans and specifications for the construction of traffic signals at the intersection of Los Angeles Street and La Rica Avenue and at the intersection of Baldwin Park Boulevard and Ohio Street; and, 2. Authorize the publication of the Notice Inviting Bids for the construction of traffic signals at the intersection of Los Angeles Street and La Rica Avenue and at the intersection of Baldwin Park Boulevard and Ohio Street. BACKGROUND The intersections of Los Angeles Street at La Rica Avenue and Baldwin Park Boulevard at Ohio Street are non- signalized. Both intersections have stop signs for traffic entering the intersection from the minor streets, while the traffic on the major streets has no traffic control. Both intersections also have existing striped school crosswalks. Due to these factors and traffic counts obtained by City staff, both intersections meet the warrant thresholds for a traffic signal installation. At its regular meeting on February 19, 2014. The City Council authorized Minagar and Associates to prepare plans and specifications, and appropriated $350,000 in Prop C funds for the construction of these traffic signals. Upon receipt of responsive bids, City staff will make a recommendation to the City Council for award of the construction contract. LEGAL REVIEW None required ALTERNATIVES The City Council could choose not to go forward with inviting bids for the construction of these traffic signals. ATTACHMENTS None — The plans and specifications are available for inspection in the Office of the City Clerk. ITEM NO. TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Manuel Carrillo Jr., Director of Recreation & Community Service DATE: January 21, 2015 SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2015-050 APPROVAL TO APPLY FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUND FOR WALNUT CREEK NATURE PARK SUMMARY The purpose of this staff report is for the City Council to consider applying for a grant and adopting Resolution No. 2015 -050 to make improvements at Walnut Creek Nature Park. FISCAL IMPACT This grant application requires a 50% match. Funds already allocated for this project can be used towards the 50% match. There is a total of $445,000 available in construction funding. Sources include the California Natural Resources Agency ($220,000), Los Angeles County Regional and Open Space District ($200,000) and Upper San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District ($25,000). Improvements at Walnut Creek Nature Park will be made in phases as funds are available. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council: 1) Waive further reading, read by title only and adopt Resolution No. 2015 -050 entitled "RESOLUTION OF THE BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR LAND AND WATER CONVERSATION FUND WALNUT CREEK NATURE PARK PROJECT "; and 2) Authorize the Director of Recreation and Community Services to execute any further documents. LEGAL REVIEW None required. • i In late 2012, staff began to have a series of discussions of local stakeholders to identify potential funding opportunities. After several letters to the Rivers and Mountains Conservancy (RMC), they agreed to provide a small planning grant to develop a conceptual design for WCNP. On September 23, 2013, the RMC Governing Board approved a $35,000 planning and design grant for WCNP. This grant provided the City money to hire Restoration Design Group to develop a conceptual design for the park. In October 2013, the City received $200,000 from the Los Angeles County Regional Park and Open Space District and $220,000 from the California Natural Resources Agency to implement the first construction phase of the project. The Upper San Gabriel Valley Water District has also committed $25,000 for WCNP. A conceptual design will be complete by the end of January 2015 and will be presented to the City Council at a future meeting. The City has applied and received for funding through the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) program for Barnes Park. Unlike other grants, the LWCF program allows for repairs to existing outdoor recreational amenities such as restrooms, picnic shelters, lighting, and additional parking. This grant application will request funding to make improvements to the structure at Walnut Creek Nature such as repairing the roof, renovating the restrooms, upgrading the flooring deck to be ADA compliant as well as any additional structural repairs needed to the outdoor structure. ATTACHMENT 1) Resolution No. 2015 -050 RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -050 RESOLUTION OF THE BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUND WALNUT CREEK NATURE PARK PROJECT WHEREAS, the United States Congress, under Public Law 88 -578, has authorized the establishment of a federal Land and Water Conservation Fund Grant -In- Aid program, providing matching funds to the State of California and its political subdivisions for acquiring lands and developing facilities for public outdoor recreation purposes; and WHEREAS, the California Department of Parks and Recreation is responsible for administration of the program in the State, setting up necessary rules and procedures governing applications by local agencies under the program; and WHEREAS, said adopted procedures established by the State Department of Parks and Recreation require the applicant to certify by resolution the approval of applications and the availability of eligible matching funds prior to submission of said applications to the State; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL HEREBY: 1. APPROVES the filing of an application for the Walnut Creek Nature Park Project for Land and Water Conservation Fund assistance; and 2. AGREES to abide by SECTION 6(F)(3) of Public Law 88 -578, which states "No property acquired or developed with assistance under this section shall, without the approval of the National Secretary of the Interior, be converted to other than public outdoor recreation uses. The Secretary shall approve such conversion only if he finds it to be in accord with the then existing comprehensive statewide outdoor recreation plan and only upon such conditions as he deems necessary to assure the substitution of other recreation properties of at least equal fair market value and of reasonably equivalent usefulness and location. "; and 3. CERTIFIES that said agency has matching funds from eligible source(s) and can finance 100 percent of the Project, of which up to half may be reimbursed; and Resolution No. 2015 -050 Page 2 4. APPOINTS the Director of Recreation and Community Services as agent to conduct all negotiations, and execute and submit all documents, including, but not limited to, applications, contracts, amendments, payment requests, and compliance with all applicable current state and federal laws which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned Project. Approved and Adopted on the 21St day of January, 2015. ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ) I, ALEJANDRA AVILIA, City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted and regularly approved and adopted by City Council of the City of Baldwin Park at a regular meeting of the City Council held on January 21, 2015 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: ALEJANDRA AVILIA CITY CLERK rj,0H TO: OF '7 E 90 FROM: • SAN GABRIEL 2�o VALLEY ,yam Pp�'�'APfD JANU�� ITEM NO. 1 Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Daniel Wall, P.E., Director of Public Works / City Engineei-G;�) January 21, 2015 SUBJECT: Authorize Purchase of Dehumidifier for the Pool at Morgan Park SUMMARY This will .9uthnrize the purchase and replacement of the dehumidifier for the Pool at Morgan Park FISCAL IMPACT This purchase will have no impact on the City's General Fund. Restricted Quimby Funds Will 1e used to pay for this capital expense. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Authorize the purchase and replacement of the dehumidifier through Honeywell. Inc. for $127,404.20 not including sales tax, and 2. Authorize the Director of Finance to make appropriate transfers and fund adjustments. BACKGROUND The building that houses the pool at Morgan Park depends on a large dehumidifier to remove excess moisture from the building and prevent the growth of mold and mildew, reduce corrosion, and help extend the building's life. The existing humidifier is 26 -years old and recently failed and cannot be repaired. The expected lifespan and a dehumidifier is 15 to 20- years. Staff solicited quotes for the replacement from three vendors, and Honeywell provided the lowest responsive quote. LEGAL REVIEW None required ALTERNATIVES There are no alternatives if the City wishes to continue to provide an aquatics program at Morgan Park. ATTACHMENTS A. Honeywell Quote for replacement of the dehumidifier. HoneYWell HOW FirM 046WI00 1 Customer: Baldwinpark Date: December 15 2014 Address: 14403 East Pacific Avenue 91706 Phone: (626) 625 - 7480 Job Location: Community Center Fax: (714) 562 -3125 Attention: Valentin Aguilar Service Rep Name: Gary Gordon Email: VAGUILARQa BALDW INPARK..COM Service Rep Signature: Service Rep Fax: 714 242 -6865 Description of Work to be Done: Replace non - repairable dehumidifcation unit for pool. This entails replacing the dehumidifier, condensing unit and furnace. Also all needed accessories will also be included, roofcurb cover, stand to accomodate the dehumidifiers new footprint, all electrical, water and plumbing connections. The unit will be started to factory snacifil— ions with a comrnlete start re-ort to be furnished ff% tlZe �l!'st^.Ine. r. Ac � partner to the City an on III going maintenance and warranty will also be supplied at no further cost. Note taxes are excluded from this quote and if needed some tree limbs may have to be removed by the City to accomodate the lifting of the equipment to the roof. Why Required? Present equipment has exceeded it's life span and is non - repairable. A 15 to 20 year equipment lifespan is to be expected, this unit is 26 years of age. All for the sum of: $ 127,404.20 Date: December 15 2014 Sales/Use tax have NOT been included and will be billed separately. Applicable Taxes Extra All price quotations valid for 30 days TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE: Honeywell will perform the work quoted above in accordance with its Standard Terms and Conditions, incorporated by reference and available upon request. Terms of payment: 10 days from receipt of invoice. All projects with duration longer than 30 days will be invoiced monthly based on progress of the work. This pricing is conditioned on the work being governed exclusively by terms and conditions listed within; any additional and /or different terms may require additional cost to the quote or Honeywell's withdrawal of our offer to perform this work. Customer Approval (All quotations must be approved and authorized by customer, in advance, before work can be started) Company Name: Billing Address: By: X (Authorized Name) PRINT (Signature) Tel. No. Date: P.O. No. OR Credit Card type Name on Credit Card Credit Card number Expiration on Credit Card For immediate repair, sign authorization and return copy to Service Rep, for delayed authorization fax signed copy to: (714) 242 -6865 Instructions: ITEM NO. I i STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers �tUB o� FROM: Daniel Wall, P.E., Director of Public Wor. / City ineer u � � Gr SAN, agRiE� e Craig A. Graves, Director of Finance �r Ak1.EY' Shama P. Curiae, Human Resources an ger AFRO JANUP DATE: January 21, 2015 SUBJECT: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT REORGANIZATION SUMMARY This item approves position and classification changes for reorganization of the Public Works Department. FISCAL IMPACT The proposed reorganization and subsequent creation of positions of two Public Works Supervisors, a Management Assistant, and the Engineering Manager will add no additional costs to the current General Fund Budget for Fiscal Year 2014/15. There will only be minor increases in costs in the other special funds that support most of the Public Works Department positions. The majority of both General Fund and Special Revenue Fund costs will be covered by salary savings due to the Engineering Assistant position being vacant the whole current fiscal year. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council: 1. Approve the implementation of the proposed reorganization 2. Approve the attached job specifications for the positions of Engineering Manager, Public Works Supervisor, and Management Assistant 3. Approve the salary ranges of the proposed positions as follows: a. Engineering Manager: $6,428- $8,614 monthly b. Public Works Supervisor: $4,243- $5,686 monthly c. Management Assistant: $3,659 - $4,904 monthly BACKGROUND With the current support structure within the Public Works Department, supervision of the support staff has been split between the Director of Public Works and the Public Works Operations Supervisor position. This created challenges from the standpoint of efficiently distributing workload across the department, defining responsibilities, and identifying the capacity of support staff to take on new assignments and prioritizing existing work efforts. To address these inefficiencies, the Public Works Department is proposing an organization structure change that will include changes to existing positions, and the addition of 1.0 FTE. The intent of this reorganization is to improve service to the public, City Council, and other City staff that rely on services provided by the Public Works Department. Engineering Manager The vacant position of Associate Engineer was budgeted for FY 2014 -15. However, after unsuccessful attempts to fill the vacant position, a review of its duties and title was discussed with Human Resources. Because this Public Works Department Reorganization January 21, 2015 PaLye 2 position will have considerably more responsibility than an Associate Engineer position, it is proposed that the vacant position be re- classed to Engineering Manager with a monthly salary range of $6,428.60- $8,614.96. Public Works Supervisor The position of Public Works Operations Supervisor is a currently vacant position. Given the current staffing levels at the City Yard the duties and responsibilities of this position have proven to be too much for any one person to be able to successfully perform. A review of the position, the duties, and its current placement within the organizational structure was conducted. The determination to create two (2) full -time positions of Public Works Supervisor positions replacing the Public Works Operations Supervisor Position was a result of the review. This change is intended to maintain the focus on providing direct support to the Director of Public Works, Wh11P r000gnizinb there al"P. o.nnsiderable duties and responsibilities that nn pnsition alone cannnt complete. As illustrated on the organizational chart (attachment A), these two positions will have direct oversight and functional supervision over the Senior Maintenance Worker positions. The monthly salary range for this position 1s $4,24J- $3,686. Management Assistant Currently support services at the City Yard are being provided by the Executive Secretary. A review of the position, duties and responsibilities and its current placement within the organizational structure was conducted. Because this position has considerably more responsibility and duties than those normally expected to be performed by an Executive Secretary, it is proposed that this position in the Public Works Department be re- classed to Management Assistant with a monthly salary range of $3,659- $4,904. ALTERNATIVES 1. City Council could defer the proposed reorganization to the Mid -Year Budget Review for discussion in relation to other budget requests. This alternative is not recommended because the Public Works Department has an opportunity to reorganize and hire new employees in the short term under a more effective model. 2. The City Council could provide direction to staff to consider alternative models. If the Council directs staff to make changes to the proposed reorganization, then staff will return to the City Council during a future meeting to present the alternative. LEGAL REVIEW None required. ATTACHMENTS A: Proposed Public Works Organizational Chart B: Job specifications for Engineering Manager C: Job specifications for Public Works Supervisor D: Job specifications for Management Assistant J 0 a c� bA 0 C4 0 CITY OF BALDWIN PARK Engineering Manager Engineering Manager 103mal'allerel'al CITY OF BALDWIN PARK Under direction, to organize, plan, coordinate, manage and supervise engineering activities within the Public Works Department; coordinate engineering activities with other divisions and departments; coordinate and supervise field operations with Public Works Supervisors; take a leadership role in implementation of the goals and objectives of the Public Works Department; and provide highly complex staff assistance to the Director of Public Works. SUPERVISION RECEIVED AND EXERCISED Receives general direction from the Director of Public Works. Exercises direct supervision over Associate and Assistant Engineer, Public Works Coordinator, Public Works Supervisor and assigned clerical, technical personnel. EXAMPLES OF ESSENTIAL DUTIES — Duties may include, but are not limited to, the following: Supervises and participates in a variety of professional and sub-professional engineer-Ing work, including the preparation of plans and project specifications; directs and/or coordinates project inspections; drafts ordinances according to general instruction. Plan, organize and direct engineering activities including, but are not limited to, the capital improvement program, land development projects, traffic engineering and assessment engineering. Supervises and participates in the review of plans; evaluates compliance with laws, ordinances, and acceptable engineering standards, and recommends corrections or improvements; supervises the preparation of legal descriptions and deeds for easements and rights-of-way. Prepares and evaluates requests for proposals relating to projects requiring contract- engineering work; directs the preparation of project cost estimates for competitive bidding purposes; reviews plans of consulting/engineering firms performing work for the City and evaluates their performance; performs construction contract modifications and negotiates contract changes and change order costs. Compiles and analyzes statistical data and prepares technical reports relating to public works projects and programs; assists in the preparation of cost projects for the department budget and monitors expenditures. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK Engineering Manager Recommend and assist in the implementation of goals and objectives; establish schedules and methods for engineering projects; implement policies and procedures. Coordinate the activities of the engineering staff and Public Works Supervisors. Develop and implement the development of the engineering work plan; assign work activities, projects and programs; monitor workflow; review and evaluate work products, methods and procedures. Participate in budget preparation and administration; prepare cost estimates for budget recommendations; submit justifications for staffing, equipment, materials and supplies; in 'tor ar rvi pcunrinsee apvu 21 ltX iitthpr^ve budget. Participate in recommending the appointment of personnel; provide or coordinate staff training; conduct performance evaluations; recommend discipline; implement discipline procedures as directed; maintain discipline and high standards necessary for the efficient and professional operation of the Department. Answer questions and provide information to the public; investigate complaints and recommend corrective action as necessary to resolve complaints. Research and prepare technical and administrative staff reports; prepare written correspondence. Build and maintain positive working relationships with co- workers, other City employees and the public using principles of good customer service. Perform related duties as assigned. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS Knowledge of: Principles and practices of engineering, public works construction and urban and regional planning. Principles and practices of public works contract administration, land development and capital improvement. Principles and practices of leadership, motivation, team building and conflict resolution. Principles and practices of business correspondence and technical report writing. Pertinent local, State and Federal laws, rules and regulations. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK Engineering Manager Budgeting procedures and techniques. Principles and practices of supervision, training and personnel management. Modern office procedures and computer equipment. Ability to: Organize, direct and implement a comprehensive engineering program. On a continuous basis, analyze technical reports; interpret and evaluate staff reports; know laws, regulations and codes; obsel—Ve per'lurmance and evaluate staff, problem solve department related issues; remember various rules; and explain and interpret policy. On a continuous basis, sit at desk and in meetings for long periods of time. Intermittently reach equipment surrounding desk; perform duties in the field including climbing and bending; perform simple grasping and fine manipulation; use telephone and communicate through written means. Assist in preparing and administering a budget. Supervise, train and evaluate personnel. Develop and recommend policies and procedures related to assigned operations. Interpret and explain policies and procedures. Analyze problems, identify alternative solutions, project consequences of proposed actions and implement recommendations in support of goals. Gain cooperation through discussion and persuasion. Establish and maintain effective working relationships with those contacted in the course of work. Communicate clearly and concisely, both orally and. in writing. Prepare construction plans using AutoCAD Experience and Training Experience: Four years of increasingly responsible professional experience in civil engineering, including one year of lead responsibility. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK Engineering Manager Training: Equivalent to a Bachelor's degree from an accredited college or university with major coursework in civil engineering, public administration or a related field. License or Certificate: Possession of, or ability to obtain, a valid applicable California driver's license. Certification as an Engineer-In-Training by the California State Board for Prollesslonall Engineers, Land Surveyors, and Geologists. City of Baldwin Park PUBLIC WORKS SUPERVISOR 101810 ,11`1 Y 0 [1164 To plan, organize and direct the activities of the street maintenance, landscape maintenance or facilities and equipment division within the Public Works department; to coordinate street maintenance, landscape maintenance or facilities and equipment activities with other divisions and departments; and to provide highly complex staff assistance to the Director of Public Works. SUPERVISION RECEIVED AND EXERCISED Receives general direction from the Director of Public Works. Exercises direct supervision over assigned maintenance and clerical personnel. EXAMPLES OF ESSENTIAL DUTIES — Duties may include, but are not limited to, the following: Recommend and assist in the implementation of goals and objectives; establish schedules and methods for street maintenance, landscape maintenance or facilities and equipment activities; implement policies and procedures. Plan, organize and direct assigned activities including for street -maintenance: traffic, graffiti, asphalt, street sweeping and concrete; for landscape maintenance: irrigation, landscape, trees and court referral; and for facilities and equipment: buildings and fleet. Coordinate maintenance activities with engineering projects. Develop and implement the development of the assigned area work plan; assign work activities, projects and programs; monitor work flow; review and evaluate work products, methods and procedures. Participate in budget preparation and administration; prepare cost estimates for budget recommendations; submit justifications for staffing, equipment, materials and supplies; monitor and control expenditures; administer the approved budget. Participate in recommending the appointment of personnel; provide or coordinate staff training; conduct performance evaluations; recommend discipline; implement discipline procedures as directed; maintain discipline and high standards necessary for the efficient and professional operation of the Department. Answer questions and provide information to the public; investigative complaints and recommend corrective action as necessary to resolve complaints. City of Baldwin Park Public Works Supervisor (Continued) Research and prepare technical and administrative reports; prepare written correspondence. Build and maintain positive working relationships with co-workers, other City employees and the Public using principles of good customer service. Perform related duties as assigned. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS Knowledge of Principles and practices of public works maintenance. Principles and practices of assigned technical area including street maintenance, landscape maintenance or facilities and equipment maintenance. Equipment, tools and materials used in a full service maintenance operation. Principles and practices of leadership, motivation, team building and conflict resolution. Principles and practices of business correspondence and report writing. Pertinent local, State and Federal laws, rules and regulations. Principles and practices of safety management. Budgeting procedures and techniques. Principles and practices of supervision, training and personnel management. Modem office procedures and computer equipment. Ability to: Organize, direct and implement a comprehensive public works maintenance program. City of Baldwin Park Public Works Supervisor (Continued) On a continuous basis, analyze technical reports; interpret and evaluate staff reports; know laws, regulations and codes; observe performance and evaluate staff, problem solve department related issues; remember various rules; and explain and interpret policy. On a continuous basis, sit at desk and in meetings for long periods of time. Intermittently twist to reach equipment surrounding desk: perform duties in the field including climbing, stooping, bending and crawling; perform simple grasping and fine manipulation; use telephone, and communicate through written means. Assist in preparing and administering a budget. Supervise, train and evaluate personnel. Develop and recommend policies and procedures related to assigned operations. Interpret and explain policies and procedures. Analyze problems, identify alternative solutions, project consequences of proposed actions and implement relationships with those contacted in the course of work. Gain cooperation through discussion and persuasion. Establish and maintain effective working relationships with those contacted in the course of work. Learn to use computer in order to maintain a variety of inventory, replacement and repair records. Communicate clearly and concisely, both orally and in writing. Special Requirements Will work weekends and evenings as required. City of Baldwin Park Public Works Supervisor (Continued) Experience and Training Experience: Four years of increasingly responsible experience in public works maintenance in one of the specialty areas assigned, including one year of IPM mqintc-nnno.c- wnA-f-.r re.,nonqibili N7 Training: Equivalent to the completion of the twelfth grade, supplemented by specialized training and/or college level course work in the areas assigned License or Certificate: Possession of, or ability to obtain, a valid applicable California driver's license. May need to possess certification for an area of assignment as required by the position. ,A A 1 J'JYJ VAJ � FAT At*J'J 191agigill To perform a variety of professional, technical, analytical, and administrative duties in providing staff assistance to a department and to do related work as required. May exercise technical and functional supervision over clerical and technical staff. DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS This is an advanced journey level general administrative class of work. Incumbents are expected to have a thorough knowledge and background of administrative practices and procedures applicable to complex research and financial analysis, project administration, local government organization, and have the ability to work productively within general policies and guidelines without direct supervision. Incumbents' duties will vary substantially depending upon the technical areas of assigned work. EXAMPLES OF DUTIES (Depending upon assignment, duties may include:) Conduct research and provide administrative assistance within a department. Assist in the development and implementation of department or city-wide goals, objectives policies and procedures. Assist in budget preparation, analysis and administration. Perform complex administrative research; gather and analyze data and make recommendations on a variety of administration, fiscal, personnel and operational problems. Prepare and distribute public information to citizens; meet with citizen groups and explain City policies, procedures, and programs. Management Assistant MANAGEMENT ASSISTAIT (Continued) Represent the City or a department in a wide variety of meetings with local business groups professional associations, State and Federal agencies, and other local entities as required. Serve as staff to specialized boards, Committees, and Commissions; assist in the preparation of agenda items; make presentations to the City Council or a Board of Commission as assigned. Assist in the preparation of a wide variety of reports, manuals, and publications. Assist in the coordination of departmental activities with other City departments and 1AA+k outside i CAI IM VVILI , outside agencies. Prepare grant applications; monitor grant programs and prepare grant performance reports. Develop recommended criteria and approaches as assigned for focused, specific City programs in a variety of public service areas. Assist in budget preparation and administration. Perform related duties as assigned. QUALIFICATIONS Knowledge of: Principles and practices of public administration. Principles, methods, and practices of municipal finance, budgeting and accounting. Research techniques, methods, and procedures-, methods of report presentation. Federal, State and local government organization. Applicable Federal, State and local laws and regulations regarding local government operations. Appropriate grant procedures, application guidelines and implementation requirements. Management Assistant 2 (Continued) Properly interpret and make decisions in accordance with laws, rules and policies. Communicate clearly and concisely, orally and in writing. Analyze a variety of technical and administrative problems and recommend and implement an effective course of action. Meet with a variety of community, State and Federal officials for program development and implementation. Prepare complete and accurate reports. Establish and maintain effective working relationships with those contacted in the course of work. Experience and Training Education Equivalent to the completion of the twelfth grade supplemented by course work in accounting, management, business administration, public administration, office practices, or a related field Training Three years of general administrative experience, preferably involving administration research, financial analysis, report preparation, grant development and program coordination. License or Certificate Possession of, or ability to obtain, a valid applicable California Driver's license. Management Assistant 3 STAFF REPORT "�'fl, TO: HUB OF A u` :HAEBRIEL 10 FROM: SAN n DATE: Leo VALLEY PQo��T6D SUBJECT: ITEM NO. Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Daniel Wall, P.E., Director of Public Works / City Engineer a January 21, 2015 AMENDMENT NO. 1 - CIVIC PLAZA DESIGN AGREEMENT SUMMARY This amendment will expand the scope of services to be provided by La Canada Design Group in. the preparation of construction plans and specifications for the proposed Civic Plaza. FISCAL IMPACT The expanded scope of services to be provided will not impact the General Fund. This work was not included in the Fiscal Year 2014 -2015 budget. The maximum cost of this additional work is not to exceed $226,394 and will be paid with unappropriated Quimby Funds. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement for Professional Services with La Canada Design Group to prepare construction plans and specifications for the proposed Civic Plaza; and 2. Authorize the Director of Finance to make appropriate trans ers and fund adjustments. BACKGROUND On June 18, 2014, the City Council named La Canada Design Group as the provider of on -call architectural services to the City. Subsequently the City Council requested that design concepts for a Civic Plaza be developed. Those conceptual designs were presented by La Canada Design Group at a publically noticed Special City Council Meeting held on September 23, 2014. At the October 15, 2014, City Council meeting a professional services agreement for the design of the proposed Civic Plaza was approved. The original concept for the Civic Plaza has evolved through the guidance of the Civic Plaza ad -hoc committee. Amendment No. 1 provides for the design of features not contemplated in original agreement that have been requested by the Civic Plaza ad-hoc committee. These features include 2,500 square feet of enclosed retail space plus a 1,250 covered deck, a 44% increase in area to be designed including a paseo from Ramona Boulevard and the City Hall grounds into the design, and the design of fountain. LEGAL REVIEW None required ALTERNATIVES The City could choose not to go forward with additional features requested by the ad -hoc committee. ATTACHMENTS Amendment No. 1 — Expanded Scope LA CAf4ADA DESIGN GROUP i k Ct lEi EC`k URE . PhANNNG . INTERIORS December 2, 2014 Rev. January 13, 201'5 Mr. Daniel Walls Director of Public Works City of Baldwin Park 14493 East Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, CA 91706' Project: New Civic Plaza Job No.: 0587.02' Subject: Request for Additional Services No. .1 — EXPANDED SCOPE Dear Dane. The following additional services request is in response to the City's requested expansion of scope. The additional services consist of 1 j preparation of legal description and plat for roadway easement along the northern limits of the Civic Plaza; 2) park design for City Nall west plaza; 3) park design for parcel extending through Ramona Boulevard commercial properties; and 4) design of retail building. The additional planning area represents about 44% of the original 2.1 acre civic plaza area, increasing the area of development to 3.0 acres. In addition, this request includes specialty services suggested at our November 17th meeting consisting of wayfinding and fountain design for the civic plaza (and with Wayfinding, an appropriate expanded area) Description Please refer to the enclosed site plan locating the areas of expanded scope. 1) Preparation of legal description and plat for roadway easement along the northern limits of the Civic Plaza— Information is needed by the City for council approval and recordation of the new roadway easement along the northern limits of the proposed Baldwin Park Civic Plaza. 1A) Preparation of a topographic survey of the north parcel (APN 8553-011-006) and the City Hall west plaza. 2} Park design for City Hall west plaza'- Comprising approximately 33,000 SF, the existing plaza will be modified to strengthen the visual and functional connections between City Hall and the Civic Plaza. 3) Park design for parcel extending through Ramona Boulevard commercial properties With City purchase of this property comprising approximately 6,900 SF, important access will be provided directly to Ramona Boulevard and commercial properties. Services include plans for demolition of existing building, 4) Design of retail building — The addition of a retail building at west side of plaza will provide opportunities for food and drink, and further energize the plaza. The projected enclosed floor area is 2,500 SF, plus an additional 1,250 SF of outdoor covered deck. See the enclosed conceptual floor plan. V,f 1R&1MVh, Patkl t , 8E , (V RP Civic P1azatCon1ract!Ad,1Sery AS 7 i'zpanded Scot elPropos aARev AS f - is ;wooed Scopc 2015 0113: clog Page 1 of 4 ROYLANCE I FE BIRD JR, t RGHTECT` FAA 630 NORTH ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD, SUITE add, PASADENA. CALIFORNIA 91107 626.351.4301 FAX: 626.351.4302 MW,LCDG.COM ?I NeVIIIII 5) Wayfinding — Exterior vehicular and pedestrian wayfinding connecting city buildings, plaza and Metro Link station; selected exterior civic buildings identification signs; minor and secondary signs; and sign guidelines for commercial tenant signage. 6) Fountains — Two fountains consisting of an architectural fountain in the main park and a reflecting pool in the City Hall plaza. Expanded Civic Plaza - As stated in our proposal dated October 2"d, 2014, the LCD,G team will provide architectural, landscape architecture, civil, structural, and MEP engineering services, adding mechanical and plumbing to our current services for the retail building. Full design services are proposed, consisting of Schematic Design, Design Development, and Construction Documents. Bidding Assistance and Construction Administration (including record drawings and project close-out) are optional services and not included in this proposal, For further description of design services refer to LCDG proposal dated 10/2/14. Wayfinding (signage) — Develop a signage and wayfinding plan for the civic center area of Baldwin Park consisting of 1) exterior vehicular and pedestrian wayfinding connecting city buildings, plaza and Metro Link station; and 2) selected exterior civic buildings identification signs. Phases of service: 1) Schematic Design (and sign planning) • Preliminary signage locations. • Design concepts for signage types. Seek a visual language to relate to architectural and civic environments. • Present up to 3 design directions for review. • Attend meetings asp necessary, 2) Design Development • Refine preferred schematics. • Designs for minor and secondary signs. • Select materials and fabrication techniques, • Develop preliminary concepts, themes and limits of commercial tenant signage. • Prepare preliminary cost estimates. • Attend meetings as necessary. 3) Design Intent Drawings (Construction Drawings) • Prepare detailed design-intent working drawings and specs necessary for bidding, fabrication and installation. • Prepare production layouts for high-profile items. Prepare typography guidelines, • Update implementation cost estimates. • Prepare written guidelines including SD illustrations to document retail sign guidelines. Fountain Design — Design and documentation of the mechanical, plumbing, electrical power, and controls for two fountains. The central water feature surrounding the pavilion will be designed as a shallow depth reflecting pool. It may be punctuated by vertical jets that respond to pre- ✓ B&Idan; Pari,kW/,02 RP Civic PWa�ContrP_MddServVS I r.­.p&ndedScope1PraposaAPev AS I -Fxpanded Scope P01b 01 13.doc Page 2 of 4 ROYLANCE LEE BIRO }R, ARCHITECT FAIA 630 NORTH ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD, SUITE 400, PASADENA, CALIFORNIA. S�1107 626,351.4301 FAX: 626.351,4302 WWW,LCDG,COM LA CANADA DESIGN GROUP ARCHITECTURE. PLANNING. INTERIORS programmed displays, A second water feature is planned in the City Hall plaza. It's performance an aesthetic form is to be determined, Phases of service: 1 ") Schematic Design • Develop options and make preliminary calculations to quantify the use of water and power for each option. • Prepare budgets for each option. • Meet with team members and City to review, discussing goals and options. Select the preferred option. 2) Design Development • Develop design, considering type of operation, performance, utilities and water treatment. • Refine cost estimate. • Meet, review with Design team. • Meet, review with City. • Incorporate comments. 3) Construction Documents • Prepare drawings and specifications for plumbing and electrical systems, pump equipment, suction intakes, valving, water level make up, overflow, drains, power, and controls. Assumptions and Understandings — Remain unchanged as stated in LCDG's proposal dated 10/2/14, except the following additions. 1) LCDG will not provide services associated with property acquisition, board resolution documentation and county recordation. 2) Retail building will be finished to the level of a "warm shell" with the core completed and rental space unfinished. Included is sizing mechanical units and exhaust fans on the roof for three tenant spaces and stubbing ductwork into the space, sizing a five meter electrical service for the building and stubbing conduit into each space, providing gas and water services for three tenant spaces with meter on building exterior and providing telephone service to the electrical room with conduit stubbed into each space. 3) Fire protection/fire hydrant flow tests of existing systems will be provided by others. 150 =.. r-T. I i e &--u Wayfinding — Hunt Design Fountain Design — Fountainhead Design Schedule — With approval of this request in January, we expect a four week extension to the current schedule dated 10/1/14. Terms and Conditions — Terms and conditions remain unchanged, except for increased fee and scope described in this request. VVAR&IdW.','; Pa'I*TbB 02 RP CiViC Pi67a,ConlraW.ddServLAS 1 Fapanded ScopePrc,rjsMRc AS I - rxpandeoScope 2015 0113;doc Page 3 of 4 ROYLANCE LEE BIRD JR, ARCHITECT FAM 630 NORTH ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD, SUITE 400, PASADENA, CALIFORNIA 91107 626,351A301 FAK 626.351.4302 WVVW.LCDG.COM Cost for Services — LCDG will provide the above services (Schematics, Design Development and Construction Documents Phases) for an increased fee of $226,394.00 for labor plus normal reimbursable expenses, to be invoiced monthly on an amount earned basis. Cost by design phase: - Legal description, plat - $3,450 - Site survey - $4,428 - Schematic Design - $53,315 - Design Development - $54,927 - Construction Documents - $110,274 Consider: I ) Fee includes some non-A-E services: legal description and plat; and topographic survey of north lot and existing city hall west plaza. 2) Site area expanded nearly 44%. 3) New retail building consisting of 2,500 SF enclosed area, plus 1,250 SF covered deck; adding mechanical and plumbing to our scope. 4) Specialty consultants: Wayfinding, Fountain Design Please refer to Exhibit A for a detailed breakdown of costs by discipline and phase. Consultant's proposals are also enclosed for your reference. Sincerely, Accepted: Lance Bird, President Daniel Wall, Director of Public Works for the City of Baldwin Park (signature) Date Encl. - Site Plan — Areas of Expanded Scope - Retail floor plan - Exhibit A — Breakdown of Costs - by discipline and phase - Consultant Proposals AS I -Fxpand eScope 201b 0113.doc Page 4 of 4 ROYLANCE LEE BIRD JR, ARCHrrECT FAIA M NORTH ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD, SUME400, PASADENA, CALIFORNIA 91ID7 626.351.4301 FAX: 626.351.4302 WWW.LCDG,COK4 --------------------- i a a • I I r I I — _ — — _ _... I 1, [t3 Lu I i C0- i l I 0 j Z [ DO W i I po i i1 i ■ CN U i Q> WEI LU LU z l i z � _i U o ; iu D m �e [ w rn I Ia l ( � ! CO ¢ LU I ! � fn 1 i L____- --------------- 1 LD tf) CV s^ N r - ct Vt CO M CN M �? Ce} I9 C6 114` Q W J Eck 6% 4C; LO e- N 0 `. 6S3 69� r CM .r �- 69- 60 0 g g 0 c? C3 C7 O C3 ° C3 ' C} 65 C7 st tCs �.t G Cfl ���EFi� iv NCO D Cc U- LL i 0 O O C N CD Lo Co t - C c cti 64 vl• 64, uj i� co N C7 0 C:> 0 0 0 c, a 0 O N LO L+ C3 CCs 1 - C3 'tr7 CCS IL U) CL u C O OOC3ti 0 LO Q tf} CC3 c- CV V5 0 d' Ci3 pr i!3 ffi 69 iJ3 O V O CL U) m CO 0 - 0 17 (f3 Cam, xa CL Q CL D X qN� 0coco C r„Mm yr M U.) CO CCt 0 CO its tt> 'd'�' Cn r^ ° �r-• '(77 C) Q � N 1 sas Q c p 6L. Q gar co V N O h- C4 LO (a O m co uj g QS Q C6 II . Q ED C U 7 U> 0 -= O Li C CA N •- 0) � cu Q � •� . C47 UJ L d (D uj ,.-� RS f ttJ G�i tFt C> 4 Ict CD U N O C CAS CL t1 -j 00Q Ulf- M PROJECT: Baldwin Park Civic Plaza B&I W.O. 1420037,00 REQUESTED BY: Lance Bird, FAIA L•DG SIGN AND RETURN ONE COPY TO., Brandow & Johnston, Inc. SCHEDULED START: !!JI-24/144 ADD. SERV. NO.: 1 DATE: November25,201 Pursuant to you request, Brandow & Johnston (B&J) is submitting for your approval this request for authorization of additional services, related to engineering design and coordination for the above mentioned project. The work associated with these tasks is a result of additional civil engineering services requested by owner that were not part of our original agreement or any prior requests for authorization of additional services. The civil engineering work associated with these tasks will be performed at a fixed fee basis, per the scope elements listed hereon. The budget associated with this request is our best estimate of time and effort involved in the requested scope of work. The following elements shall be included in the civil engineering scope of work for completion of these supplemental services: 1. Prepare a legal description and plat to be used by the city of Baldwin Park for council approval and k I- recordation of the roadway easement along the northern limits of the proposed Baldwin Park, Plaza [Fee $3,000] 2. Prepare Topographic Survey of north Lot (APN 8553-011-006) and existing City Hall west Plaza [$3,8501 3. Prepare Site demolition, precise grading, drainage, sewer, domestic water, erosion control plans, horizontal control plans, SWPPP, Low Impact Development plan, and cost estimates for additional areas to Include north lot (APN 8553-011-006) and City Hall West Plaza [Fee $16,5001 It shall be noted that the following exclusions apply: A, Boundary survey at City Hall Parcels (west of Pacific/Main Street) B. Street Improvement Plans within existing City Right-of-Way C, Water Fountain systems and structure design. It shall be rioted that services required for negotiating acquisition of rights from private/public entities, public hearings, city council review, board resolution documentation, and county recordation will be provided the City's Internal staff, and excluded from this fee proposal, It is also assumed that processing fees and county recordation costs will be paid by the city. ESTIMATED ENGINEEPJNG FEE: $23,350 BRANDOVat & JOHNSTON, INC. 700 South Hower Street, Sub 1800, Los Angeles, CA 90071 Page 1 of 2 Structural & DWI 5nglne6-s 18831 Von Karman Avenue, Ste 240, Irvine, CA 92612 Client: LCDG Project: Baldwin Park Civic Plaza- Add Service I November 25, 2014 Page 2 The above-mentioned work will be performed can a fixed-fee basis, plus standard reirribursables (e g, prints, messenger service, etc,), in accordance with the General Terms of our original Agreement. Should additional time and cost become necessary we will obtain your approval for amended budget prior to conducting the work, Should this proposal meet your approval, please sign below, and return it to our office, as an authorization to invoice these additional services. We understand that you will be processing an amendment to the contract for this work, as a part of BW existing open agreement, and it will be forthcoming within 30 days of your initial approval, Approved and accepted in accordance wlth the General Terms of Agreement: FUZANMW A.1n14NQTnN Mr. tR 11 - L4WC_ '_ ._ _ k-&" CLIENT. A California Corporation ADDRESS. Gerard M. Nleblas, S.E., President Licensed Structural Engineer #2723 By: Orlando Morena, P_F C6545- lVan7a, P"17apagDirector of OvIl EngVne&70g 7k1e,' CLLENT TION TO P OCEED AND SEND ALL PLEASE RMRN ONE SIGNED COPY OF AGREEMENT AS Ai R AGREE TENT RELATED CDRRESPONDENCE TIO' Orlando Moreno, P.E. • I" E 61 Brandow &Johnston, Inc. 700 South Flower Street, Suite 1800 Los Anqele�, CA 90071 ornoreno@bjsce.corn 8 P. A N D 0 W & 3 0 H N S T 0 N , I N C, 700 South Flower Street, Suite 1800, Los Angeles, CA 90071 Page 2 of 2 Structural & (9W Engineers 18831 Von Karman Avenue, Ste 240, Irvine, CA 92612 ARMSTRONG & WALKER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 1838 Igo 1paks Drive North, Bradbury, CA 91008 629 387 -4588 FAX 626 357-6536 email armistrangwalker(LOadelphia,net Additional Services related to New Civic Plaza, City of Baldwin Park For: La Canada Design Grou PROPOSED NOT-TO-EXCEED FEE BRFAICDC?WN November 2s, 2014 Scope of Additional Landscape Architectural Serwlces includes redesign of the existln C' Hall West lava, and addition of a arcs! extending throe h Ramona commercial properties, The new retail building will not have a significant effect on landsca a des! n ' process, Flours and corres ondin fees listed below am In addition to these submitted in o€er Oct.1, 2014 fee breakdown. PRINCIPAL DES1Di2AFT CLERICAL ' TASK 5120.001HR $80.tl01HR $40.001HR SUBTCiTAL Phase 1. Schematic Des! n TOTAL A. Extend site visit to observe/ record e>dsbng oonditions & context In new areas 1.0 1.0 0.0 180.00 B. Internal work sessionldeskrn charette, coordinate wl Architect & Civil Engineer to devetc sohemaft design for hardsca a layout, landscape design, site features, 2rading & storm dralna ,.concepts, connections to surrounding sites 4.0 4.0 110 $ 760.00 C, Incorporate exist trees to remain into tree & plant palette, e and assistance to Architect on material selections for hardsca e, site amenities, s na e,landscape lighting, water feature, art elements, etc. 10 4.0 0.0 $ 600.00 L. Add new areas to Schematic Landscape Plan for Internal & C' staff review 1.0 3.0 1.0 $ 340.00 E. Initial cast estimate for landscapt, installation 1.0 110 1.0 $ 220.00 Fee for Phase l $ 2,100.00 Phase 2: Design Development A, Revise/ refine and finalize design & material selections for Iandsca a in new areas & Integration into eAsti ' at Ci Hall, I ' lion, finish grading & landsca e fi h8 3.0 6.0 0.0 $ 720.00 B. Assist/ coordinate wl Architect & design team on design details & material selections- for hardscape, site features, water feature, etc. in new areas 1 2.0 1 4.0 1 0,0 $ 480:00 C. Expand color- rendered Preliminary Landscape Plan hoto boards iwl r sed lant& tree species, landscape !l ht fixtures, site amenities to Include new areas 210 6:0 110 $ 640.00 D. Updated cost estimate for landscape installation & maintenance 0.5 1.0 1.0 $ 160:00 Fee for Phase 2 21000.00 $ Phase 3: Construction Documents A. Irrigation Plan & ,rioter use dales for landscape at new sites 'S sheet` 1 4.0 1 &0 1 1.0 B. Planting Plan for landsca a at new site 1 sheet 1 3.0 8,0 1 0.0 is 840.00 C. AsslsV coordinate wt Architect on construction drawings for hardscape & site features, w1 Civil E 'rieer on gradigS, wl Electrical E !near on lighting for new sites 2;0 3.0 0.0 1 $ 420.00 D. Updated cost estimate for landscape installation & maintenance 0.5 110 1.0 1 $ 160.00 E. Plan check oorrections as necessary for City & other a2en approvals 3 submittals 2.0 3.0 1.0 $ 460.00 e Pee for Prase 3 # 2,8$0.00 TOTAL. NOT -TO- EXCEED ADDITIONAL FEE PHASES 4 - 3 $ 6,9$0,00 Additional Allowance for Reimbursable B(penses*1 $ 120.00 TOTAL NOT-TO-EXCEED ADDITIONAL COST FOR FEES & EXPENSES1 IS 7,100.00 Phase 4: Bidding Assistance related to Additional Areas (optional) A. Respond to bidders' questions related to new areas, provide information for addenda as r ulred 1.0 3.0 1 1.0 1 $ 340.00 Fes for Phase 41 1 $ 340,00 Phase 5: Construction Administration related to Additional Areas (optional) A. Review submitialstsarn les, respond to contractor's requests for information 1.0 2,0 1.0 1 $ 280.00 B. 4 site visits - check finish grading, Inigation cove e, plant qua! & placement 1.0 2.0 0.0 $ 240.00 C. Final walk - throe h & punch list upon com letion 0.8 1.0 1.0 $ 16(!.00 D. Produce record drawln s from contractor's field plans & notes 4.8 2.0 1;0 $ 220.00 Fee for Phase 5J.... S 900.00 "includes CAD plotting of up to 10 !an sheets on bond paperphotocopying, scanning, photo printing, mounted drawings & photos on exhlbft boards, mileage for meetings & site visits 22r above Sao a of Services & $.50 /mile. only actual rIgEnses will be billed. w PR03ECTs City of Baldwin Park BW NO.: 1410407 Civic ADD. SERVICE Ni?.: 1 Baldwin Park, CA DESCRIPTION: Design of Retall Building aar r November 2r (Rev. Dec. 1, 2. Provide structural specifications 3. Provide # t art t estimates based on costs of projects wit the last year. s mr. e-sffmator and does not r r. on adW rr -rrtt a +& ,:t. t.... cost estmtes rnay not reflect ailmnt M25& ar on :r. t : .t 4. Schematic Drawings vAll consist only of a foundation plan and a franting plan and will be done In PDF foffr4 radrer than t ENGINEERING FEE: For the #r t ' of services described above r this project, #. ,t. ,:r. Es"Mma-th—wi structural engineering Schematic Design fee $1,400.00 (houdy basisret —LW exceed) Estimated structural engineering Design Development fee $2,35D.00 (hourly basis, not to exceed) Estimated : ar engineering Construction Documents t. #i 1^i (bourly basis, not to a.,.s_-°# Reimbursable Expenses # t-f; BRMDOW is 3OHNSTON, ::. Client: ^.p ve r' and accepted ed in acoDrdance A California Corporation with the general terms of agreement LA CANADA DESIGN GROUP 630 N. Rosemead Blvd., Sulte '!# Pasadenaf I's r ON B Date s1:11117TIM 11 a�_ .. BRAN @ O ;;A► & 3 O N N S T O N t INC. 70O SD th f wer Sxeet. Sub 18W ARgeb9, Gl 9#17 T 213 SN 4,5M Structural & Civil Engineers IMI Von Kam avenue, suite 240, WOO, cA 92612 T 949 %245W November 25, 2014 Lance Bird, FAIA, Principal La Canada Design Group 630 N. Rosemead Blvd #400 Pasadena, CA 91107 dear' Lance, Thank you for considering P2S Engineering Inc. for provision of additional service for the referenced project. We are pleased to provide you our following proposal that defines our statement of understanding, our scope of services, our deliverables, schedule and fees and is in line with the scope of work forwarded to us on the subject project. Our office understands the additional scope of this project includes provision of engineering services for the increased scope associated with the new Baldwin Park Civic Center. Our office understands the scope to include lighting design for (2) expanded park areas, power design for (2) water features, design of CCTV and emergency Blue Light Telephones in park area and MEPT design for the shell retail building. The scope for proposed shell space for retail building Will include sizing mechanical units and exhaust fans on the roof for (3) tenant spaces and stubbing duct work into the space, sizing a (5) meter electrical service for the building and stubbing conduit into each space, providing gas and water services for (3) tenant spaces with meter on building exterior and providing telephone service to the electrical room With conduit stubbed into each space. The following is our detailed scope of services: SrA MWEW OF UNDERSUAVINOISCOPE OF SERMES Scope of Work — Additional Services St*eir"atic Design 1. Coordinate electrical room size requirements. 2. Coordinate with SCE for electrical service to the proposed facility/park. 3. Provide a site layout with general locations of light fixtures being used for new areas. 4. Provide an electrical room layout. 5. Provide mechanical equipment sizes and weights. 6. Provide an MEP Basis of Design Narrative. Z '=n I � U R t P25 Engineering, Inc. T 562497.2999 Z 5006 East Spring Street, 8th Floor F 562-497,2990 o Long Beach, CA USA 90815-5218 ww w.p2seng.com j-n 5; 9 w to xx Engineering Services Proposal to Lance Bird, FAIA, Principal La Canada Design Group October 1, 2014 Page 2 of 3 Design Developinent 1. Review Schematic Design review comments and provide appropriate response. 2. Prepare lighting photometrics for landscape and pathway lighting. 3. Prepare Design Development documents to include MEPT for shell building and lighting, power, security and AV layouts for park space. 4. Provide cost estimate for MEPT systems. 5. Prepare Design Development Specifications. Construciion Documents 1. Review Design Development review comments and incorporate into documents. C- Provide '%.0n:—�LrU1'-Lf0rt Documents for IMEVI of shell building and lighting, power, security and AV of park. 3. Provide schedules and details. 4. Provide book specifications in CSI Master Format. S. Update cost estimate for MEPT systems. 6. Provide submittal to building department. 7. Respond to plan check comments and coordinate approval. 8. Prepare Lighting Title 24 documents. Bidding 1. Review Requests for Information (RFI) during the bid process and provide appropriate response to La Canada Design Group for distribution. 2. Prepare addendum as required for issue by La Canada Design Group. Construction Support Servizes 1. Provide review of submittals and respond to request for information from the contractor. 2- Provide final punch list at project completion. Deliverables Our office Will provide electronic documents for use by La Canada Design Group. Schedule Our office Will meet the schedule established by La Canada Design Group, < z 0 -Z Engineering Services Proposal to: Lance Bird, FAIR, Principal La Canada Design Group October 1' 2014 Page 3 of 3 Fees We propose to undertake the work defined for the following breakdown: Schematic Design $6,000 Design Development $7,200 Construction Documents $10,500 Bidding $1,500 Construction Support $9,700 invoicing will occur monthly based on percent of project completion. We look forward to the opportunity of working with you on this project. Should you have any questions or need clarifications, please contact us, Sincerely, P14-0868A Ur141125-LB WWI%t a z> a Ln .10 01 o2 xx December 1, 2014 La Canada Design Group Attention: Lance Bird Signage and Graphics Planning, Design and Related Services Project Baldwin Park Civic Center Signg2e Hunt Design is pleased to present this proposal to develop a signage and wayfinding plan for the civic center area of Baldwin Park, Scope of Work —Areas and Elements The services listed below under Scope of Work — Services, are for these elements or areas of the projects, where appropriate, 25 North Memo, A enbe Pasaeana, CA 91106 T 62099,7847 F 626�79'12549 0 Exterior vehicular and pedestrian wayfinding connecting city buildings, plaza and Metro Link station hunteesignsom 0 Selected exterior civic buildings identification signs Scope of Work — Services Hunt Design will provide these services: 1. Schematic Design (and Sign Planning) 1.1. Working over site plans, identify preliminary signage locations elements. 1.2. Develop design concepts for representative signage types. Seek a visual language to relate to architectural and civic environment. 1.3. Present up to three design directions for review. 1.4. Attend meetings as necessary Work Products: Freftmin" sign plans, Visual presentations to demonstrate signage concepts 2. Design Developrrient 2.1. Refine best of schematic designs, 2.2. Prepare designs for minor and secondary signs. 2.3. Select preliminary materials and fabrication techniques. 2.4. Develop preliminary concepts, themes and limits of commercial tenant signage. 2.5. Prepare preliminary cost estimates. 2.6. Attend meetings as necessary. Work Products., Visual presentations to demonstrate developed designs, preliminary tenant sign guidelines, 3. Design Intent Drawings (Construction Drawings) 31. Prepare detailed design4ntent working drawings and specifications necessary for the bidding of fabrication and installation of signage including, elevations, necessary sections and details, sign messages and copy layouts, 3.2. Prepare production layouts for high-profile items where necessary. Prepare typography guidelines for the remainder of items. 3.3. Update implementation cost estimates. 3.4. Prepare written guidelines including schematic Illustrations to document retail sign guidelines. Work Products., Documents for bidding, implement and installation of signage elements. 4. Construction Administration 4.1 . Assist In Identifying qualified signage contractors far all work. 42, Assist in review of bids and selection of contractor(s). 4.3. Review shop drawings, R171s, color and material samples and mock-ups provided by sign contractor(s): 4.4. Inspect work during fabrication process. 4.5. Prepare 'punch list' of items requiring post Installation attention by sign contractor, Fees Hunt Design will charge for the above services on a Jump sum fixed-fee basis, by project phase. 1. Schematic Design (and Sign Planning) $13,500 2. Design Development $10'a 3. resign Intent Drawings (Construction Drawings) $14,700 4. Construction Administration $ 5.200 $44,2€?0 Not Included at this tune; Engineering. The fees are based approximately on estimated hours per task multiplied by our standard hourly blended billing rate of $1301hr. Standard hourly rates: Principal $150; Design and Programming $130; CADiech $90. Respectfully submitted. Expenses such as printing will be invoiced at cost. HUNT DESIGN Revisions and Additions. This proposal covers only the services outlined. If the scope of work changes, . approved revisions or additions will be charged for on an hourly basis, and as an addition to the original contract. Termination of Conpact: Assuming just cause, either party reserves the right to terminate this agreement after giving ten (1 0) days written notice to the other. Hunt Design Associates shall be paid for services and reimbursable expenses incurred under this contract up W the date of such termination. Cash Row and 777nrely Payrnents: Timely and regular payments of Hunt Design Associates invoices are required for continuous work on the project. Sequence of Wink: The fees stated above are based on executing the project or large project portions as a group or groups. That Is, Items added out of sequence or after general approvals of areas or phases, may be considered as extra to the contract. Od9ina#V- All reasonable care will be taken to avoid accidental duplication of graphic designs already in existence, but responsibility and `matters of registration, trademarking, copyrighting, rest with the owner. Best Effort Basis: The creative services described' above will be provided on a `best effort" basis. That is, Hunt Design Associates will create designs based on our training, experience and professional judgment and that represent our best effort; non - acceptance of the design(s) shall not constitute reason for non - paynnent. Publ aty: Hurt Des*Qn Associates reserves the right of reasonable publicity about its participation in this prj Extended Schedule: The fees stated above are based upon the described project schedule. Delays In the overall project; schedule may result In additional fees. Restarting the project after an inactive period of more than two months will result in a restart fee of 3% of the total project fees. The Information, languages and descriptions in this proposal are Me copyrighted property of Hunt Design Associates and may not be reproduced or transferred to any other party without permission. HUNT design engineering project management To: LANCE BIRD, FAIR; PRINCIPAL LA CANADA DESIGN GROUP 630 N. ROSEMEAD BLVD, #400, PASADENA, CA 91107 0: 626-351-4301 EXT: 104 C: 60-80--7-4ill Grnmi J S n n a D 1. D 1. Er- RN Fountainhead 0: 323,913.0915 C: 323.868.1814 Date: 12 / JAN / 2015 Re: Water Features Schematic Design, Design Development, and Construction Documentation for Baldwin Park Civic Plaza BID SUMARY FOR ENTIRE SCOPE OF WORK: $36,000 Dear Lance, Thank you for the opportunity to submit a proposal for design services for the Baldwin Park Civic Center water features. The following is our understanding concerning the services to be provided for the design. The summary of our proposal contains bid pricing for the design of this system (see below for details). Design Services Quotation. 1. SCOPE & DES-19N INTENT: The scope of our work includes the design and documentation of the mechanical, plumbing, electrical power, and controls as related to two fountains for this project. We will work with La Canada Design Group ('LCDG') as we work through Schematic and Design Development before commencing Construction Documentation in order to arrive at a design that meets the performative, aesthetic, safety and long-term maintenance goals of the city of Baldwin Park (the client"). This bid does not include structural engineering for basins, decking, or walls. The central water feature surrounding the pavilion shall consist of a shallow <2" depth reflecting pool designed for maximum reflectivity. ft may also be punctuated by vertical jets that respond with pre-programmed displays to visitors` presence in the fountain and pavilion vicinity. A second water feature located by the curb of Maine Ave shall operate using a recirculating system. Its performance and aesthetic form is TI3D. Specifications for water level controls, filtration and sanitzers, chemical purification systems (as needed) and other spedalized fountain components and controls/ timers for both water effects and lighting will also be included. 70 2.1 There are different strategies to be explored for the central fountain. Over recent years the requirements for recirculating interactive systems have become somewhat extensive. These incJude, chlorinators with data loggers, full time UV purification, holding tanks for increased chlorine dwell time and spray velocity restrictions. We will discuss these concerns as well as the option of using fresh city water from a reliable water line to create both the reflecting pool and highly Visible and refreshing sprays of water. Our office will make preliminary calculations to quantify the project use of water and power for each option. WWW,JENNADIDIER.COM 2.2 Meet with the architect and landscape architect to review the project parameters. Project goals and options will be discussed and prioritized. From this meeting, the options that we wish to present to the client for their approval will be selected. 23 Generate budgets and narratives for each of the options to be presented. These will be reviewed by LCDC prior to presentation to the client 2.4 Meet with with the client in order to present options for the water features. The presentation will include precedent images of water features by Fountainhead and others that depict the aesthetic and performative elements we wish the client to review and approve for Design Development: Presentation materials will be projected. We will provide hand -outs of the budget and project narrative. 2.5 Materials to be reviewed by the client will also include comparisons of one fountain' typology versus another vis -a vis a ROM of the design and construction costs and the projected maintenance and operating costs for each fountain, 3,_ DESIGN DEVELOPMENT: ,. Prepare conceptual renders and schematics that depict the selected design direction, if the design direction selected is the option for a recirculating, water- treatment intensive design for the fountain around the pavilion, additional charges may be incurred. 3.2 Preliminary pricing and developed project t narratives included. 3.3 A second meeting with the design team to review the design included. 3.4' A second meeting to review and approve the design with the client included. 4; 9ONSTRUCTION`i3QCU ENTABQN. 4,1 Prepare construction documents for the plumbing and electrical systems to generally include the plumbing, pump equipment, suction intakes, valving, water level make up, overflow, drains, junction' boxes, conduit sizing, electrical plans, treatment and low level cut off controls for each fountain. if the design direction selected is the option for a recirculating, water-treatment intensive design for the central fountain around the pavilion, additional charges may be incurred. 4.2 This design is to be provided in the farm of detailed drawings both in plan and elevation with equipment details generated on our CAD system. This work will be depicted on approximately (5-S) project -sized sheets on our title block. This extensive detailing of the necessary fountain work not only assures the owner of a quality long lasting installation but insures a very competitive bid climate due to the comprehensive information included without contractor over- estimates. 4.3; Specifications in draft form together with the specified actual manufacturers` equipment alts will be provided. 4.4 The design is provided in Portable Document File (pdf) format if plotted output is desired, a plotting fee will be charged. S. SERVICES NOT INCLUDED: 5.1 Additional visits to the client. 5.2 Re- design for changes in system parameters subsequent to the commencement of construction documents. 5.3 Format submission of a pricing package or partially completed documents. 5,4 Site visits. 5.5 As built drawings.. I EXTRA SERVICES: 6.1 Services not included in the basic scope of work will be provided on an hourly or lump sum basis at current billing rates listed below. Reimbursable expenses will be billed at direct cost. 6.2 We will identify extra services as they are requested or as a need is recognized by this office, An estimate of cost will be proposed and authorization requested before any additional work is undertaken. WWW.JENNADIDIER.COM 7. FEES:, Design Total: $36,000.00 71 Schematic Design $4,000.00 7.2 Detailed Design $8,000.00 7.3 Construction Documents $24,000.00 Optional support 7.4 Operations & Maintenance Manuals $ included 7.5 Provide construction support services to include: $ 10,000 7.5.1 Bidding Support/ Review of submittals. 7.5,2 Construction Administration including: Clarification, as required, of construction documents and Assistance with the issuance and negotiation of change orders. Three site visits will also be included: one at the start of construction, the second upon completion of the rough-in before the first pour, and the third upon completion of the water features for test and adjust. E v- t r a _se M16--S � 7.6 Billing rates through I /January 12016: 7.61 Design: $ '150.001 hr 7,6.2 Drafting (cad): $ 85.00 / hr 7:6,3 Clerical: $ 35.001 hr 8, REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES: In addition to fees, Fountainhead shall be paid for actual costs on reimbursable expenses such as; printing, vellums, copying, telephone fiBes, postage, delivery charges, travel costs, data processing, and any other out of pocket expenses directly connected with the execution of this work. Anything extraordinary *11 not be incurred without your prior approval. 9 PAWENT: This proposal is contingent upon the following conditions regarding payment.- 9.1 A 50% deposit of the design fee is required to secure our services. 9.2 We will submit our billing when each phase of the contract is complete and delivered to your office. 93 Your office will submit our billing with your next regular billing cycle. 9,4 Your billing cycle for this project does not exceed 31 days. 9.5 Funds received on our behalf will be disbursed within 10 days. 9.6 There will be no retention of funds due to us by either your office or your client. 11 SCHEDULE: We can normally provide the Schematic Design assistance in 1 to 4 weeks, Design Development assistance in 2 to 4 weeks and the Construction Documents in 4 to 6 weeks after receiving an authorization to proceed and a purchase order for our services, provided our requests for Information are satisfied within I to 2 days. 11. PROFESSIONAL SEAL: Due to the multidisciplinary nature and geographical diversity of our work, we find it impractical to provide a professional seal on our drawings, Our drawings are normally issued without seal or under the seat of the Architect or Landscape Architect for whom we are working. If an engineering seal is required we Wit cooperate with any qualified professional that your office or your client may retain to review our work and seal our draMngs. rs'"Lum Again, thank you for the opportunity to quote our services on this project and we look forward to working with you in the near future. Please let me know if you require any further information. Sincerely, Jenna Didier, Principal Fountainhead Design Inc. If you wish this quotation to become our agreement you may accept our offer by executing the acceptance below and returning a signed copy to us. The following additional conditions will then apply: a. You may accept our offer only be accepting all the terms without change. Any change by you will become a counter offer and subject to our acceptance, b. This agreement when signed by you will represent the entire and integrated agreement between us and supersedes all verbal and written negotiations and agreements between us. It s, binding on our partners, successors, and assigns. It may not be assigned by either of us without the prior written consent of the other. c. If there is s conflict that arises during the course of this work between our two parties, it is agreed that the two parties will first seek professional dispute resolution through mediation rather than arbitration. If it then becomes necessary to interpret or enforce this agreement it will be done through binding arbitration under the rules of the American Arbitration Association. The prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys fees. d. Our agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. e. Our offer to enter into an agreement shall expire and no longer be subject to acceptance unless accepted and returned to us by 30 days from the date of this document. The foregoing offer is agreed to and our acceptance shall be deemed effective as of the date it is communicated to Fountainhead Design Inc. Executed at. Company: IN its this - day of 2015. 3��Z ITEM NO. TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Shannon Yauchzee, Chief Executive Officer a DATE: January 21, 2015 SUBJECT: RATIFY THE RETENTION OF ATTORNEY SERVICES SUMMARY It is recommended that City Council ratify the retention of 1) the Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck Law Firm, 2) the Gutierrez, Fierro & Erickson Law Firm and 3' ) the Kaufman Law Firm to provide legal advice and legal representation for the City of Baldwin Park and add to City's panel of approved attorneys, FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact to add this legal firm to the City's panel. The cost of legal services will depend on time spent on legal matters. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended the City Council ratify the retention of the listed Law Firms and add the firms to the City's panel of legal firms upon execution of retainer agreements to be approved as to form by the City Attorney and executed by the Mayor. BACKGROUND The City maintains a list of approved attorneys under contract to specialize in certain matters such as Labor, Land Use, and Environmental Law. From time to time it is necessary to update the list. 1) Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck Law Firm The demands of ongoing litigation and transactional matters require the City receive additional specialized legal advice to protect its legal interests. The Law firm of Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck specializes in environmental (CEQA) litigation and related matters and has represented both public and private sector clients since its founding in 1968. The Brownstein Firm with specific expertise in environmental matters has already been retained to represent the City by filing a CEQA Writ of Mandate against the City of Irwindale on the Olive Pit Rock Quarry matter. The hourly rates proposed by Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck are as follows: Partners ...................... $445 Senior Associates....... $335 Associates .................. $245 2) Gutierrez, Fierro & Erickson Law Firm The demands of ongoing litigation and transactional matters require the City receive additional specialized legal advice to protect its legal interests. The Law Firm of Gutierrez, Fierro & Erickson specializes in Labor and a broad array of Municipal Matters and has represented both public and private sector clients for more than thirty years. The hourly rates proposed by the Gutierrez, Fierro & Erickson Law Firm are as follows: Partners ...................... $300 Senior Associates....... $260 Associates .................. $220 3) Kaufman Law Firm The demands of ongoing litigation and transactional matters require the City receive additional specialized legal advice to protect its legal interests. Mr. Kaufman of the Kaufman Law Firm specializes in business litigation, employment law, and personal injury cases and has represented both public and private sector clients for more than 25 years. The hourly rates proposed by Kaufman Law Firm are as follows: Partners ...................... $375 Senior Associates....... $325 Associates .................. $250 LEGAL REVIEW This report has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney as to legal form and content. ALTERNATIVES The alternative is to not add these firms and or choose alternate firms. 2 SUMMARY Recently the State Controller's Office completed an Asset Transfer Review of the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission for the period of January 1, 2011 through January 31, 2012 and issued its Report (Exhibit A) to the City on November 26, 2014. It is a standard review that the State Controller's Office is conducting of all Redevelopment Agencies (Community Development Commissions) statewide in compliance with Health and Safety Code Section 34167.5. During the review the State Controller's Office determined that the partial repayment of loans paid on January 25, 2011 (Exhibit B) by Commission Development Commission to the City should not have been made at that particular time and that the repayments of the loan should occur as part of the ROPS process subject to the Oversight Board's approval. After the City and the Community Development Commission had taken this initial action on January 25, 2011, language was discovered in the bill that dissolved Redevelopment Agencies and was approved June 28, 2011, restricting certain transactions as of January 1, 2011 the day the legislation was introduced. A final determination of the validity of the legislation was made by the California Supreme Court on December 28, 2011. To address the State Controller's Office determination with regards to the repayment of the loan the City is returning $3,473,836 to the Successor Agency which represents the amount the State Controller has ordered be returned to the Successor Agency. The return of the funds from the City to the Successor Agency results in an equivalent adjustment in the amount owed to the City by the Successor Agency under the original loan agreement bringing the total outstanding loan amount owed to the City to $21,901,790. In order for the Successor Agency to collect Real Property Tax Trust Fund revenues and eventually repay the City Loan, the Successor Agency needs the approval of the Oversight Board to include the returned loan repayments on the next Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (the `BOPS "). The next RODS will be presented to the Successor Agency at its February 18, 2015 meeting, then approved by the Oversight Board and submitted to the State Department of Finance the first week in March. While the State Controller's Office has determined the City can still collect the loan amount from the Successor Agency, the returned loan repayment must still ITEM NO. STAFF REPORT TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of 'he ncil HUB OF �� �, THE FROM: Craig A. Graves, Director of Finance ' Marc Castagnola, Director of Comm i Deve op SAN GABRIEL Zco VALLEY; 1 DATE: January 21, 2015 ` 7�50 JAW P¢yIPI SUBJECT: AUTHORIZE THE RETURN OF $3,473,836 OF LOAN REPAYMENTS TO THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF A CITY LOAN IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE STATE: CONTROLLER'S OFFICE REPORT AND REQUEST THE OVERSIGHT BOARD APPROVE INCLUDING THE REPAYMENT OF THE CITY LOAN ON ROPS 15/16A SUMMARY Recently the State Controller's Office completed an Asset Transfer Review of the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission for the period of January 1, 2011 through January 31, 2012 and issued its Report (Exhibit A) to the City on November 26, 2014. It is a standard review that the State Controller's Office is conducting of all Redevelopment Agencies (Community Development Commissions) statewide in compliance with Health and Safety Code Section 34167.5. During the review the State Controller's Office determined that the partial repayment of loans paid on January 25, 2011 (Exhibit B) by Commission Development Commission to the City should not have been made at that particular time and that the repayments of the loan should occur as part of the ROPS process subject to the Oversight Board's approval. After the City and the Community Development Commission had taken this initial action on January 25, 2011, language was discovered in the bill that dissolved Redevelopment Agencies and was approved June 28, 2011, restricting certain transactions as of January 1, 2011 the day the legislation was introduced. A final determination of the validity of the legislation was made by the California Supreme Court on December 28, 2011. To address the State Controller's Office determination with regards to the repayment of the loan the City is returning $3,473,836 to the Successor Agency which represents the amount the State Controller has ordered be returned to the Successor Agency. The return of the funds from the City to the Successor Agency results in an equivalent adjustment in the amount owed to the City by the Successor Agency under the original loan agreement bringing the total outstanding loan amount owed to the City to $21,901,790. In order for the Successor Agency to collect Real Property Tax Trust Fund revenues and eventually repay the City Loan, the Successor Agency needs the approval of the Oversight Board to include the returned loan repayments on the next Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (the `BOPS "). The next RODS will be presented to the Successor Agency at its February 18, 2015 meeting, then approved by the Oversight Board and submitted to the State Department of Finance the first week in March. While the State Controller's Office has determined the City can still collect the loan amount from the Successor Agency, the returned loan repayment must still Staff Report Authorizing the Return of $3,473,836 to the Successor Agency in compliance with State Controller's Office Asset Transfer Review Report, Recommending Action To Adjust Outstanding Loan Balance and to Request Returned Loan Repayments Be Included in the Next RODS be approved by the Oversight Board and the repayments must be included in the bi- annual ROPE process approved by the Oversight Board and the Department of Finance. FISCAL IMPACT There is no i_m_nact on the current General Found Budget, the General Fund TvT ir Gs+ r il+ ed Reserve or the General Fund Emergency Reserve (Budget Stabilization). Because of the uncertainty of interpretations of the original legislations, funds from the January 25, 2011 actions were placed in reserve in a special fund until final determinations would eventually be made by the State. To repay the loan repayment of $3,473,836, Special Reserve Fund 200 would pay back $2,866,910 which is where the proceeds were originally placed, and the remaining $606,926 would come from the Assigned Reserve of the General Fund which was established during Fiscal Year 2010/11. 1 1171-11 E00 1. That the City Council authorize the return of $3,473,836 to the Successor Agency that was originally paid to the City in repayment of various loans for administrative costs incurred by the Community Development Commission with $2,866,910 from Fund 200 and $606,926 from the Assigned General Fund Reserve. 2. That the outstanding balance of the City's Loan as set out in the City Loan Agreement with the Successor Agency be adjusted to reflect the return of the $3,473,836 to the Successor Agency and adjusted to $21,901,790 3. The City request that the Oversight Board approve including returned loan repayment in the Successor Agency's next BOPS. 4. That the Director of Finance be authorized to make all necessary budget amendments, changes in loan balances and transfers ALTERNATIVES There are no other viable alternatives as if the City does not comply with the order from the State Controller's Office the State may take legal action to force compliance which would result in the City incurring additional legal costs. LEGAL REVIEW This recommended action has been reviewed by both the City Attorney and Special Counsel. Staff Report Authorizing the Return of $3,473,836 to the Successor Agency in compliance with State Controller's Office Asset Transfer Review Report, Recommending Action To Adjust Outstanding Loan Balance and to Request Returned Loan Repayments Be Included in the Next ROPE BACKGROUND On January 1, 2011 the Governor introduced legislation that would dissolve and eliminate local Redevelopment Agencies. Most cities in California took actions to protect various City loans and assets of both the City and their Redevelopment Agency. The City of Baldwin Park and its Community Development Commission passed several actions on January 25, -2-0-1 1 that involved- the purchase of property with low /mod housing fiends and the partial payment of loans that were made to the Community Development Commission to cover administrative costs that had not been covered by current tax increment. Later in the spring it became apparent that the legislation was retroactive to the January 1, 2011 introduction date and was being recommended that this date remain even though the legislation had yet to be signed. The legislation was eventually passed on June 28, 2011. Because of the initial uncertainty all proceeds from these transactions were placed in a special fund to ensure the City and Commission would have the available funds if any negative determination was made at a later date. While the funds were held in the special fund, the City and Community Development Commission proceeded with the dissolution process with the Oversight Board that was also set up by the legislation. The City received the Successor Agency's Finding of Completion on April 26, 2013 and on August 29, 2013 a final determination on the Housing Asset Transfer Plan. During August of 2014, the State Controller's Office conducted its Asset Transfer Review for the period of January 1, 2011 through January 31, 2012. Their initial review disallowed $8,483,156 of asset transfers. However, the City supplied additional information that clearly showed that $5,009,320 of funds were used to purchase property and that this property was included in the Housing Asset Transfer List that had been previously approved. The Successor Agency in September amended its Long Range Property Management Plan (LRPMP) to remove those properties purchased with Low/Mod Housing Funds from the Plan as they were already part of the Housing Asset Transfer List. The City and Successor Agency are awaiting final approval of the LRPMP from the State Department of Finance. With that additional information, the State Controller's Office determined that only the $3,473,836 loan repayment was not an allowable cost to be paid back in one lump sum during that time period and that those funds should be returned to the Successor Agency and that the $3,473,836 should be paid back through the regular ROPS process and the Oversight Board allowed under Health and Safety Code Section 34191.4. The recommended action would comply with the State Controller's order to return $3,473,836 in loan repayment funds to the Successor Agency and would adjust the outstanding loan amount Staff Report Authorizing the Return of $3,473,836 to the Successor Agency in compliance with State Controller's Office Asset Transfer Review Report, Recommending Action To Adjust Outstanding Loan Balance and to Request Returned Loan Repayments Be Included in the Next BOPS under the City Loan Agreement. The Successor Agency would need to request the Oversight Board allow the returned loan repayment to be added to the ROPE and authorize the entire outstanding obligation be paid back through the ROPS process which would eventually allow the Successor Agency to payback the City under the original Loan Agreement. Attachments: (Exhibit A) State Controller's Office Asset Trans cr Review Report, November 2014 (Exhibit B) Agenda of the Meeting of the City Council and Community Development Commission of January 25, 2011 (Exhibit C) Adjusted Outstanding City Loan Schedule E)CHIMIT N 1 t t t i ► G,N��► ASSET TRANSFER REVIEW Review Report January 1, 2011, through January 31, 2012 JOHN CHIANG California State Controller November 2014 04.f .C' C�M1'r 9 4 b P, JOHN CHIANG Tafifurnia �$ta e Tvntry er November 26, 2014 Craig A. Graves, Director of Finance City of Baldwin Park/Successor Agency 14403 E. Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park; CA 91706 Dear Mr. Graves: Pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 34167.5, the State Controller's Office (SCO) reviewed all asset transfers made by the Community Development Commission of the City of Baldwin Park (RDA) to the City of Baldwin Park (City) or any other public agency after January 1, 2011. This statutory provision states, "The Legislature hereby finds that a transfer of assets by a redevelopment agency during the period covered in this section is deemed not to be in furtherance of the Community Redevelopment Law and is thereby unauthorized." Therefore, our review included an assessment of whether each asset transfer was allowable and whether the asset should be turned over to the Successor Agency. Our review applied to all assets including, but not limited to, real and personal property, cash funds, accounts receivable, deeds of trust and mortgages, contract rights, and rights to payment of any kind. We also reviewed and determined whether any unallowable transfers to the City or any other public agency have been reversed. Our review found that the RDA transferred $21,812,191 in assets after January 1, 2011, including unallowable transfers to the City totaling $8,483,156, or 38.89% of transferred assets. However, on September 4, 2014, the City provided additional documentation for the adjustment of $5,009,320 related to the acquisition and transfer of various real properties. Therefore, the remaining $3,473,836 in unallowable transfers must be turned over to the Successor Agency. If you have any questions, please contact Elizabeth Gonzdlez, Chief, Local Government Compliance Bureau, by telephone at (916) 324 - 0622, or by email at egonzalez @sco.ca.gov. Sincerely, Original signed by JEFFREY V. BROWNFIELD, CPA Chief, Division of Audits JVB /sk Craig A. Graves, Director of Finance -2- November 26, 2014 cc: Marc Castagnola, AICP, Community Development Manager City of Baldwin Park Manuel Lozano, Chair Oversight Board of Baldwin Park Successor Agency John Naimo, Auditor - Controller Los Angeles County Rose Tam, Assistant Accounting Manager City of Baldwin Park Richard J. Chivaro, Chief Legal Counsel State Coniroiicr'S Office Elizabeth Gonzalez, Bureau Chief Division of Audits, State Controller's Office Scott Freesmieier, Audit Manager Division of Audits, State Controller's Office Trisha Quiambao, Auditor -in- Charge Division of Audits, State Controller's Office Amy Arghestani, Auditor Division of Audits, State Controller's Office David Botelho, Program Budget Manager California Department of Finance Community Development Commission of the City of Baldwin Park Asset Transfer Review Review Report Summary............................................................................................. ............................... 1 Background......................................................................................... ............................... 1 Obiective, Scone, and Methodology ................................................. ............................... 2 Conclusion........................................................................................... ............................... 2 Views of Responsible Officials ........................................................... ............................... 2 RestrictedUse ..................................................................................... ............................... 3 Finding and Order of the Controller .................................................... ............................... 4 Schedule 1— Unallowable Asset Transfers to the City of Baldwin Park .......................... 6 Attachment —City of Baldwin Park's Response to Draft Review Report Community Development Commission of the City of Baldwin Park Asset Transfer Review ffro M, Summary The State Controller's Office (SCO) reviewed the asset transfers made by the Community Development Commission of the City of Baldwin Park (RDA) after January 1, 2011. Our review included, but was not limited to, real and personal property, cash funds, accounts receivable, deeds of trust and mortgages, contract rights, and rights to payments of any kind from any source. Our review found that the RDA transferred $21,812,191 in assets after Jann.gry 1 2011, including unallowable transfers to the City of Bald... Park (City) totaling $8,483,156, or 38.89% of transferred assets. However, on September 4, 2014, the City provided additional documentation for the adjustment of $5,009,320 related to the acquisition and transfer of various real properties. Therefore, the remaining $3,473,836 in unallowable transfers must be turned over to the Successor Agency. Background In January of 2011, the Governor of the State of California proposed statewide elimination of redevelopment agencies (RDAs) beginning with the fiscal year (FY) 2011 -12 State budget. The Governor's proposal was incorporated into Assembly Bill 26 (ABX1 26, Chapter 5, Statutes of 2011, First Extraordinary Session), which was passed by the Legislature, and signed into law by the Governor on June 28, 2011. ABX1 26 prohibited RDAs from engaging in new business, established mechanisms and timelines for dissolution of the RDAs, and created RDA successor agencies and oversight boards to oversee dissolution of the RDAs and redistribution of RDA assets. A California Supreme Court decision on December 28, 2011 (California Redevelopment Association et al. v. Matosantos), upheld ABX1 26 and the Legislature's constitutional authority to dissolve the RDAs. ABXI 26 was codified in the Health and Safety (H &S) Code beginning with section 34161. H &S Code section 34167.5 states in part, "... the Controller shall review the activities of redevelopment agencies in the state to determine whether an asset transfer has occurred after January 1, 2011, between the city or county, or city and county that created a redevelopment agency or any other public agency, and the redevelopment agency." The SCO identified asset transfers that occurred after January 1, 2011, between the RDA, the City and/or any other public agency. By law, the SCO is required to order that such assets, except those that already had been committed to a third party prior to June 28, 2011, the effective date of ABX1 26, be turned over to the Successor Agency. In addition, the SCO may file a legal action to ensure compliance with this order. M Community Development Commission of the City of Baldwin Park Asset Transfer Review Objective, Scope, Our review objective was to determine whether asset transfers that and Methodology occurred after January 1, 2011, and the date upon which the RDA ceased to operate, or January 31, 2012, whichever was earlier, between the city or county, or city and county that created an RDA, or any other public agency, and the RDA, were appropriate. We performed the following procedures: • Interviewed Successor Agency personnel to gain an understanding of the Successor Agency's operations and procedures. • Reviewed meeting minutes, resolutions, and ordinances of the City, the RDA, the Successor Agency, and the Oversight Board. • Reviewed accounting records relating to the recording of assets. • Verified the accuracy of the Asset Transfer Assessment Form. This form was sent to all former RDAs to provide a list of all assets transferred between January 1, 2011, and January 31, 2012. • Reviewed applicable financial reports to verify assets (capital, cash, property, etc.). Conclusion Our review found that the Community Development Commission of the City of Baldwin Park transferred $21,812,191 in assets after January 1, 2011, including unallowable transfers to the City of Baldwin Park totaling $8,483,156, or 38.89% of transferred assets. However, on September 4, 2014, the City provided additional documentation for the adjustment of $5,009,320 related to the acquisition and transfer of various real properties. Therefore, the remaining $3,473,836 in unallowable transfers must be turned over to the Successor Agency. Details of our finding are described in the Finding and Order of the Controller section of this report. Views Of We issued a draft review report on August 20, 2014. Craig A. Graves, Responsible Director of Finance, responded by letter dated September 4, 2014, disagreeing with the review results. The City's response is included in Officials this final review report as an attachment. -2- Community Development Commission of the City of Baldwin Park Asset Transfer Review Restricted Use This report is solely for the information and use of the City of Baldwin Park, the Successor Agency, the Oversight Board, and the SCO; it is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. This restriction is not intended to limit distribution of this report, which is a matter of public record when issued final. Original signed by JEFFREY V. BROWNFIELD, CPA Chief, Division of Audits November 26, 2014 -3- Community Development Commission of the City of Baldwin Park Asset Transfer Review Finding and Order of the Controller FINDING— The Community Development Commission of the City of Baldwin Park Unallowable asset (RDA) made unallowable asset transfers of $8,483,156 to the City of transfers to the Baldwin Park (City). The transfers occurred after January 1, 2011, and City of Baldwin the assets were not contractually committed to a third party prior to Park June 28, 2011. The transfers consisted of the following: • On January 25, 2011, the RDA transferred $3,473,836 in cash to the City for payments against loans made between the RDA and City. • On January 25, 2011, the RDA transferred $5,009,320 in cash to the Ct.y for the purchase of five land parcels and a parking casement. The parcels and parking easement were subsequently included on the Long -Range Property Management Plan (LRPMP). Health and Safety (H &S) Code section 34167.5 states that any asset transfers performed by the RDA to a city, county, city and county or any other public agency after January 1, 2011, that are not contractually committed to a third party for the expenditure or encumbrance of those assets, must be returned to the Successor Agency for disposition in accordance with H &S Code section 34177(d). Order of the Controller Pursuant to H &S Code section 34167.5, the City is ordered to reverse the transfers totaling $8,483,156, and turn over the assets to the Successor Agency. However, on September 4, 2014, the City turned over $5,009,320 in real property to the Successor Housing Agency. Therefore, the remaining $3,473,836 in assets must be turned over to the Successor Agency. City's 's Response The City's response in regard to the finding was, in part: With regards to the SCO's determinations in the Draft Report regarding the CDC's repayment of $3,473,836 of loans to the City, the Successor Agency requests that the SCO's final report state that: The SCO is only making a determination that the $3,473,836 payment made to the City to reduce the CDC's outstanding loan amount should be returned to the Successor Agency because the payment was made after January 1, 2011 and that the SCO is not questioning the validity of the loans or the eventual repayment of the loans. 2. White the SCO is ordering the return of the repaid loan funds to the Successor Agency, the $3,473,836 being returned to the Successor Agency can be added back to the current outstanding loan amount and submitted to the Oversight Board for approval on -4- Community Development Commission of the City of Baldwin Park Asset Transfer Review the City's ROPS for repayment in the future as allowed under Health and Safety Code Section 34191.4(b)(1). The Successor Agency originally inadvertently included these properties in the Long Range Property Management Plan ( "LRPMP "). However, because these properties are housing assets the properties are not subject to transfer under the LRPMP. The City and Successor Agency submit that these assets have been dealt with through the appropriate channels and that the Department of Finance's approval of the Housing Asset Transfer List constitutes a final determination that the properties are housing assets and that the funds expended by the CDC to acquire those properties were not improperly spent. See Attachment for the City's complete response. SCO's Comment With regard to the RDA- purchased properties, the SCO acknowledges the receipt of additional documents supporting the conveyance of $5,009,320 in real property to the Successor Housing Agency. The Order of the Controller and Schedule 1 have been modified accordingly. With regard to the loan repayments totaling $3,473,836, the SCO does not question the validity of the loan. The loan's enforceability is the responsibility of the Successor Agency's Oversight Board. Repayments must be made through the Recognized Obligation Payment process. Therefore, the City is ordered to reverse the transfers and turn over the assets to the Successor Agency. -5- Community Development Commission of the City of Baldwin Park Asset Transfer Review Schedule I— Unallowable Asset Transfers to the City of Baldwin . January 1, 2011, through January 31, 2012 Payments to the Citv Total unallowable cash transfers $ 3,473,836 Purchase of five land parcels and narkina easement from the Citv Date APN Description Acquisition Cost Fund Date Fund Purpose t rro�. l nssCt a Lai January 25, 2011 801 Repayment of principal on loan from the city $ 67,752 January 25, 2011 801 Repayment of principal on loan from the city 131,205 January 25, 2011 801 Payment of accrued interest on loan from the city 50,295 January 25, 2011 801 Payment of accrued interest on loan from the city 86,583 January 25, 2011 803 Repayment of principal on loan from the city 51,693 January 25, 2011 803 Payment of accrued interest on loan from the city 29,654 January 25, 2011 806 Repayment of principal on loan from the city 44,676 January 25, 2011 806 Repayment of principal on loan from the city 2,237,413 January 25, 2011 806 Payment of accrued interest on loan from the city 23,814 January 25, 2011 806 Payment of accrued interest on loan from the city 40,311 January 25, 2011 806 Payment of accrued interest on loan from the city 182,886 January 25, 2011 834 Repayment of principal on loan from the city 1,974 January 25, 2011 890 Repayment of principal on loan from the city 444,561 January 25, 2011 890 Payment of accrued interest on loan '11 Om the city °01,019 Total unallowable cash transfers $ 3,473,836 Purchase of five land parcels and narkina easement from the Citv Date APN Description Acquisition Cost January 25, 2011 8544 - 020 -901 Land $ 920,100 January 25, 2011 8437 - 013 -905 Land 1,948,200 January 25, 2011 8554- 001 -901, 904, & 907 Land 675,000 January 25, 2011 n/a Parking easement 400,000 January 25, 2011 8554- 001 -910 Land 216,000 January 25, 2011 8553 -011 -901 Land 850,020 Total unallowable property transfers 5,009,320 Total unallowable transfers 8,483,156 Less adjustments for various properties turned over to the Successor Housing Agency on September 4, 2014 (5,009,320) Total transfers subject to H &S Code section 34167.5 $ 3,473,836 TO Community Development Commission of the City of Baldwin Park Asset Transfer Review Attachment r '', Response Report Draft Review September 4, 2014 Ms. Elizabeth Gonzalez Chief, Local Government Compliance Bureau Division of Audits State Controller's Office P,O, 9428SO Sacramento, CA 94250-5874 VIA E-MAIL and CERTIFIED MAIL Dear Ms. Gonzalez: The City of Baldwin Park (the 'City") and the Successor Agency to the Community Development Commission of the City of Baldwin Park (the 'Successor Agency") have reviewed the draft audit report prepared by the State Controller's Office ('SCO") in connection with the requirements set forth in Health and Safety Code Section 34167.5 (the "Draft Report"). In the letter transmitting the Draft Report, the SCO provides the Successor Agency an opportunity to submit any comments concerning the Draft Report within 10 calendar days after receipt of the letter (or by September 5, 2014), The Successor Agency respectfully submits this letter as the Successor Agency's written comments on the specified findings of the Draft Report and to request that these comments be incorporated somewhere in the final report to be issued by the SCO. With regards to the SCO's determinations in the Draft Report regarding the CDCs repayment of $3,473,836 of loans to the City, the Successor Agency requests that the SCO's final report state that: 1. The SCO is only making a determination that the $3,473,836 payment made to the City to reduce the CRC's outstanding loan amount should be returned to the Successor Agency because the payment was made after January 1, 2011 and that the SCO is not questioning the validity of the loans or the eventual repayment of the loans, 2. While the SCO is ordering the return of the repaid loan funds to the Successor Agency, the $3,473,836 being returned to the Successor Agency can be added back to the current outstanding loan amount and submitted to the Oversight Board for approval on the City's ROPS for repayment in the future as allowed under Health and Safety Code Section 34191,4(b)(1), Page 2 With regards to the SCO's determinations in the Draft Report regarding the $5,009,320 of funds used by the CDC to acquire affordable housing properties from the City, the City and the Successor Agency respectfully request that the SCO remove the finding from the final report for the reasons specified below, In the Draft Report, the SCO has called into question a transfer of $5,009,320 of funds from the CDCs Low- and Moderate-income Housing Fund ("LIVIII-IF"). The property transfer was completed pursuant to a Purchase and Sale Agreement executed january 2013.1, which constituted an enforceable obligation through February 1, 2012. Under that agreement, in exchange for 'the transfer of the funds, the CDC received several parcels of equivalent value for purposes of creating affordable housing in the City. Because the real property assets were acquired by the CDC using proceeds from the CDC's LMIHF, the real properties received in exchange are considered "housing assets" of the CDC under Health and Safety Code Section 34176(e)(1), real property acquired with LMIHF for affordable housing purposes, At the time the CDC was dissolved on February 1, 2012, the housing assets were required to be transferred to the entity assuming the housing functions of the Former RDA under 34176(b). As required under Health and Safety Code Section 34176(a)(2), the Successor Agency and the City submitted a Housing Asset Transfer List, to the Department of Finance, identifying all of the housing assets of the CDC transferred to the housing successor meeting the definition under Health and Safety Code Section 34176(e). A copy of the Housing Asset Transfer List (including all of the properties acquired tinder the Purchase and Sale Agreement) is attached for your review. As part of the DOF's review of the Housing Asset Transfer list, the City and Successor Agency were required to provide documentation establishing that the real properties included in Exhibit A of that document were in fact housing assets, The City provided the Department of Finance a copy of the Purchase and Sale Agreement and additional documents related to acquisition of the properties. The City and Successor Agency representatives attended a meet and confer with the Department of Finance to discuss the Housing Asset Transfer List. As a result of the meet and confer and the City and Successor Agency's ability to establish that the properties were acquired for affordable housing purposes, the Department of finance approved the Housing Asset Transfer List, including the properties acquired for the $5,009,320 LMIHF payment. Also attached for your review is the Department of Finance's final determination letter approving the Housing Asset Transfer List. The Successor Agency originally inadvertently included these properties in the Long Range Property Management Plan ("LRPMP"), However, because these properties are housing assets the properties are not subject to transfer under the LRPMP, The City and Successor Agency submit that these assets have been dealt with through the appropriate channels and that the Department of Finance's approval of the Housing Asset Transfer List constitutes a final determination that the properties are housing assets and that the funds expended by the CDC to acquire those properties were not improperly spent. The City and Successor Agency is currently submitting a revised "LRPMP" to reflect the proper placement of these assets. The City and Successor Agency requests that language be added to clarify the City's has no responsibility for repayment of any of the $5,009,320 of the funds, Page 3 The City appreciates being able to comment before the final report is issued. We look forward to reviewing a revised draft of the report to ensure that these comments are incorporated into the final report. if you have further questions or would like to discuss our comments further please contact me by telephone at (626) 960-4011, ext. 288 or email at cgraves(@baldwinpark.com as Mark Castagnola is currently away on vacation, Sincerely, Craig A. Graves Director of Finance Attachments: California Department of Finance Findings of Completion California Department of Finance Housing Approval of Housing Transfer List Housing Transfer List Cc: Shannon Yauchzee, CEO City of Baldwin Park Robert Tafoya, City Attorney City of Baldwin Park Marc Castagnola, Community Development Manager City of Baldwin Park Rose Tam, Assistant Accounting Manager City of Baldwin Park Rafael Yaquian, Special Counsel Goldfarb & Lipman Jeffery V, Brownfield, CPA, Chief, Division of Audits, State Controller's Office AK n� z us, Itil DEPARTMENT OF F_DmuNi7 G, SR©WN JR. - E30VF_RNOR IF N ■ a, "� 0 57 5 L STR­-Y 0 SACR —C-0 CA H *7;35 Z 4 -3700 Q WWW.00VR -_A.GO7 April 26, 2013 Mr. Vijay Singhal, Chief Executive Officer City of Baldwin Park 14403 East Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, CA 91706 Dear Mr. Singhal` Subject: Request for a Finding of Completion The California Department of Finance (Finance) has completed the Finding of Completion for the City of Baldwin Park Successor Agency. Finance has completed its review of your documentation, which may have included reviewing supporting documentation submitted to substantiate payment or obtaining confirmation from the county auditor- controller. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code (HSC) section 34179.7, we are pleased to inform you that Finance has verified that the Agency has made full payment of the amounts determined under HSC section 34179.6, subdivisions (d) or (e) and HSC section 34183.5. This letter serves as notification that a Finding of Completion has been granted. The Agency may now do the following; • Place loan agreements between the former redevelopment agency and sponsoring entity on the BOPS, as an enforceable obligation, provided the oversight board makes a finding that the loan was for legitimate redevelopment purposes per HSC section 34191.4 (b) (1). Loan repayments will be governed by criteria in HSC section, 34191.4 (a) (2). • Utilize proceeds derived from bonds issued prior to January 1, 2011 in a manlier consistent with the original bond covenants per HSC section 34191.4 (c). Additionally, the Agency is required to submit a Long -Range Property Management Plan to Finance for review and approval, per HSC section 34191.5 (b), within six months from the date of this letter, 'lease direct inquiries to Andrea Scharffer,'Staff Finance Budget Analyst, or Chris Hill, Principal Program Budget Analyst, at (916) 445- 1546. Sincerely, STEVE SZALAY Local Government Consultant cc: Mr. Marc Castagnola, Community Development Manager, City of Baldwin Park Nis. Rose Tarn, Assistant Accounting Manager, City of Baldwin Park Ms. Kristina Burns, Los Angeles County Department of Auditor- Controller California State Controller's Office *X DEPARTMENT F EDMUND G, BROWN JR, - GOVERNOR FI N A N 0 O 91 5:1 STRZET X S—RAME—C' CA A. 95S 1 4.3706 0 4 W,omr.c-mav August29,2013 Ms. Rose Tam, Assistant Accounting Manager City of Baldwin Park 14403 East Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, CA 91706 Dear Mr. Sirighai: Subject: Housing Assets Transfer Form This letter supersedes Finance's Housing Asset Transfer Form letter dated August 31, 2012. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code (HSC) section 34176 (a) (2), the City of Baldwin Park as Housing Successor Agency (Agency) submitted a Housing Asse's Transfer Form (Form) to the California Department of Finance (Finance) on August 1, 2012, for the period February 1, 2012 through August 1, 2012. Finance issued its determination related to those transferred asset on August 31, 2012. Subsequently, the Agency requested a Meet and Confer session on one or more items that was objected to by Finance. The Meet and Confer session was held on January 28, 2013. Based on a review of additional information and documentation provided to Finance during the Meet and Confer process, Finance has completed its review of those specific items being disputed. Exhibit D, Items 4 and 5 — Loan recievables totaling $1,680,806, Our review indicates these items are recievables for loans made from the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund to the Supplemental Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund. Finance notes that while these recievables can be transferred to the Agency, they should be included in Exhibit G, not Exhibit D, Finance recommends this change should be made. Exhibit D, Item 14 — Loans Receivable totalmg $42,075. Finance continues to object to the transfer of the asset. Our roview indicates the loan was issued or October 24, 2011. HSC section 34163 (b) prohibits an agency from entering into agreements, obligations, or contracts with any entity for any purpose after June 27, 2011. Therefore, this loan recievable should remain with the Baldwin Park Successor Agency (Successor Agency). If and when repayments are made, the Successor Agency should use those funds to satisfy approved enforceable obligations. This is Finance's final determination related to the assets reported on your Form. Except for items disallowed as noted above, Finance is not objecting to the remaining items listed on your Form, Assets transferred deemed not to be a housing asset shall be returned to the sticcessor agency. Mr. Singhal August 29,_2013 Page 2 Please direct inquiries to Evelyn Suess, Dispute Resolution Supervisor, or Danielle Brandon; Analyst, at (916) 445 -1546. Sincerely, STEVE SZALAY Local Government Consultant cc: Mr. Marc C:astagnola, Community Development Manager, City of Baldwin Park Ms. Kristina Burns, Manager, Community Redevelopment Administration Section; Property Tax Division, Los Angeles County Auditor - Controller's Office Mr, Steven Mar, Bureau Chief; Local Government Audit Bureau, California State Controller's Office State Controller's Office Division of Audits Post Office Box 942850 Sacramento, CA 94250 -5874 http: / /www.sco.ca.gov a> E E U r y LL C F 'O N N O C N IX wy 2 > G W 3 0 C7 ry� o Q i J W 2 O c N U G i c d N > c Q E O c N m c C a N c S 65 Q v U N r- 0 co O N LL 3 r 3 � � d m c N c T > IX N Q U co c c O O 3 Ny LL C Q U f6 c c IX y w c j > N > Q E U O N LL y C, U m c j a`oi a LL Q C7 C 0 3 y LL U N c @ c N a > N Q m E � Of � 3 c LL to c m c Q C7 Z Q ( iL c Z ® U J + m LL 0 O ( I y. c U U LL a5 w � a co N N Ul) N � O N N N N O O O O V 't r W (6 M 'I O N n v co co N r M co M U) O1 CD m tM M O N m C6 - W os N N N � -11� OOi to N N W L6 C4 C ( (o v w 0 N m O c O r_ O J d co O N N R w LL r F O O N O w } N Q LL W r c 0 O J U 0 h co co O O L6 co LO N to O O O O O N lf) N O O V' O M O V LO O LO to M O O Iq tOf7 N O O N r cl ci OD N r� m co m O N N N a) N OV CO r M OR N ((o V) — O to m W N O 0` ,w N N a5 w � a co N N Ul) N � O N N N N O O O O V 't r W (6 M 'I O N n v co co N r M co M U) O1 CD m tM M O N m C6 - W os N N N � -11� OOi to N N W L6 C4 C ( (o v w 0 N m O c O r_ O J d co O N N R w LL r F O O N O w } N Q LL W r c 0 O J U 0 h co co O O L6 co LO N to O O O O O N lf) N O O V' O co 0 N (O n v N N Q fD C N LL � N N O O N N } } LL LL n O N 72 N y E m 0 J 2F a rn 0 <+i L2 0 N M M V M W LO to M O co r � O V O m co m N N a) (o co to to o) to CO r M M r O M N r M co 0 N (O n v N N Q fD C N LL � N N O O N N } } LL LL n O N 72 N y E m 0 J 2F a rn 0 <+i L2 0 FA M 3 FT a I ul 01 a � a- CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING Please note meeting January 25, 2011 Cl' HALL - 3' Floor, Conference Room 307 14403 EAST PACIFIC AVENUE BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 (626) 960 -4011 P > A> R- K Manuel Lozano - Mayor /Chair Marlen Garcia - Mayor Pro Tem/Vice Chair Monica Garcia - Council Member'Memb`r Ricardo Pacheco - Council Member /Member Susan Rubio - Council Member /Member PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES AND PAGERS WHILE MEETING IS IN PROCESS POR FAVOR ®E APAGAR SUS TELEFONOS CEL ULARES Y BEEPERS DURANTE LA ,JUNTA PUBLIC COMMENTS The public is encouraged to address the City Council or any of its Agencies listed on this agenda on any matter posted on the agenda or on any other matter within its jurisdiction. if you wish to address the City Council or any of its Agencies, you may do so during the PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS period noted on the agenda. Each person is allowed three (3) minutes speaking time. A Spanish - speaking interpreter is available for your convenience. COMENTARIOS DEL PUBLICO Se invita al p6blico a dirigirse al ConciGo o cualquiera otra de sus Agencies nombradas en esta agenda, para hablar sobre cualquier asunto publicado en /a agenda o cualquier tema que est8 bajo su jurisdicci6n. Si usted desea la oportunidad de dirigirse al Concilio o aiguna de sus Agencias, podrJ hacerlo durance el periodo de Comentarios del Publico (Public Communications) anunciado en la agenda. A cads persona se le permite hablar portres (3) minutos. Hay un int6rprete Para su conveniencia. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Special Meeting is hereby called to be held on 14 TUESDAY. JANUARY 25, 2011 at 6,30P.M. at Qh, Hall — 3rd Floor Conference InNoom '30'7, L —I,jr '' 14403 East Pacific Avenue, Baldwin Park, CA 91706. Said Special Meeting shall be for the purpose of conducting business in accordance with the attached Agenda. NO OTHER BUSINESS WILL BE DISCUSSED Dated: January 24, 2011 at 5:45 p.m. Manuel Lozano Mayor 1, Laura M. Nieto, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, certify that I caused the aforementioned Notice and Call of a Special Meeting to be delivered via email (hard copy to follow) to each Member and to the San Gabriel Valley Tribune, and that I posted said notice as required by law on January 24, 2011 at 5:45 p.m. Laura M. Nieto, CMC Deputy City Clerk �1 1 l` it r a d .r. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL: CITY COUNCIL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING — 6:30 P.M. Councilmembers /Members: Monica Garcia, Ricardo Pacheco, Susan Rubio, Mayor Pro TemfVice Chair Marlen Garcia and Mayor /Chair Manuel Lozano PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Three i3► minute cneaking time Jlrnif Tres (3) minutos sera el limite pars hablar THIS IS THE 77ME SET ASIDE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL PLEASE NOTIFY THE CITY CLERK. IF YOU REQUIRE THE SERVICES OF AN INTERPRETER Nr4action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special cir4umstances exist. The legislative body or its staff may: 1) Briefly respond to statements made or questions asked by persons; or 2) Direct staff to investigate and /or schedule matters for consideration at a future meeting. [Government Code §54954.2] ESTE ES EL PERIODO DESIGNADO PARA DIRIGIRSE AL CONCILIO FAVOR DE NOTIFICAR A LA SECRETAR/A SI REQUIERE LOS SERVICIOS DEL INTERPRETS Alba, se podra tomar accidn en algOn asunto a menos que sea incluido en Ia agenda, o a mends que exista alguna erriergencia o circunstancia especial. Et cuerpo legislative y su personal podran: 1) Responder brevemente a deolaraci6nes o preguntas hechas por personas; o 2) Dirigir personal a investigar y/o fijar asuntos pars tomar on consideraci6n en juntas proximas, jCodigo de Gobiemo §54954, 2J n 1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION (GC §54956.9) Initiation of litigation pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 54956.9 Number of Cases: One (1) RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION REPORTS OF OFFICERS 2. PURCHASE /SALE OF CITY -OWNED PARCELS AND PARKING EASEMENT BY/TO THE BALDWIN PARK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION FOR LOW- AND MODERATE - INCOME HOUSING Staff recommends City Council 1) authorize the Mayor to execute the sale /purchase agreement and parking easement agreement on behalf of the City for the CDC's acquisition of the parcels listed in the report for affordable housing development purposes and the parking easement; 2) Authorize the Executive Director to purchase the parcels as listed in this report and execute the sale /purchase agreements and parking easement agreement with the City of Baldwin Park for the acquisition of the parcels and parking easement and pay $5,009,332 to the City of Baldwin Park from the LMIHTF for affordable housing development purposes and the parking easement and 3) authorize the Finance Director to set aside the amount of $5,009,332 in a separate fund restricted for future development or redevelopment of the community. 3. TRANSFER OF PARCELS OWNED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION WITHIN THE SIERRA VISTA AND CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT AREAS AS ASSETS OF THE COMMISSION'S NON- HOUSING FUND TO BECOME ASSETS OF THE COMMISSION'S LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING FUNDS Staff recommends Commission authorize the CDC Treasurer and Executive Director to make the necessary changes to the CDC's accounts and budget to reflect the transfer of the real property, described above, as assets of the CDC's non - housing fund to be assets -of the CDC's, 1 AAILiTF and tUransfer. $11, A 00 300 L1 orn 'the cpirl i r :. the CDC's, i -iviii i 1 t and �Gilt3ttrtl tt ll�l IC3U,JVV fl Vtil LI IC I+LJ I.+�J L.IVIIF`I (C' to the CDC's non - housing fund to reflect that asset transfer. 4. OUTSTANDING LOANS FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION TO THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK Staff recommends City Council & Commission begin the payment of all outstanding loans from available tax increment at the end of each fiscal year, after payment of bonded and other superior indebtedness, and waive further reading, read by title only and adopt Resolution No. 461, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, REAFFIRMING THE OUTSTANDING LOAN IN THE AMOUNT OF $20,615,588 FROM THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK FOR ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES." 5. REPAYMENT OF AMOUNTS OWED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION'S LOW- AND MODERATE - INCOME HOUSING FUND Staff recommends City Council & Commission 1) repay a portion of the amounts owed as discussed in the staff report and 2) authorize the Finance Director to set aside the amount of $3,399,0011 in a separate fund restricted for future development or redevelopment of the community, 6. REPAYMENT OF, AMOUNTS OWED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION TO THE CITY FOR ADMINISTRATIVE LOANS Staff recommends City Council & Commission 1) repay a portion of the amounts owed as discussed in the staff report and 2) authorize the Finance Director to set aside the amount of $4,346,884 in a separate fund restricted for future development or redevelopment of the community. CERTIFICATION I, Laura M. Nieto, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing agenda was posted on the City Hall bulletin board not less than 24 hours prior to the meeting. January 24, 2011 at 5:45 p.m. Laura M. Nieto, CIVIC Deputy City Clerk im IJ_.T*1 CITY OF BALDWIN PARK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Honorable Chair and Members of the Ca Is Ion Vijay Singhal, Chief Executivo Officer January 25, 2011 t�o f 4 Z STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: PurchaseiSale of City-Owned Parcels and Parking Easomont bylto the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission for Low- and Moderate•Income Housing The purpose of this report is for the City Council to consider selling specific City-owned parcels and a parking easement to the Community Development Commission of the City of Baldwin Park (CDC), with payment from the CDC's Low- and Moderate-Income Housing Trust Fund (LMIHTF), for the purposes of developing affordable housing units. BACKGROUND There are a few City- and CDC-owned parcels that have potential for development throughout the City of Baldwin Park. Throughout the years, City staff has made significant efforts to develop certain of those City- and CDC-owned parcels; however, due to their Irregular shape, size, ocation, and market conditions, development of those parcels has not taken place. Staff believes sale of some of those City-owned parcels to the CDC will allow those properties to be developed as affordable housing/mixed-use developments. The CDC continues to meet its requirements for affordable housing development, in accordance with its 5-Year Redevelopment and Housing Implementation Plan and as required by law. In order to assist with the development of underutilized City-owned parcels and to continue to meet or exceed affordable housing requirements, the City proposes to sell specific City - owned parcels to the CDC with payment from the CDC's LMIHTF. City-Owned Parcels January 25, 2011 Page 2 o'13 The following is a list of parcels being considered: 1. APN 8544.020-901: 30,670 square feet (0.70 acre) parcel currently used as public parking located at the rear of retail uses, along Maine Avenue and Ramona Boulevard In the Downtown. 2. APN 8437-0113-905: 64,940 square feet (1,49 acre) parcel with an old brick building formerly used as part of the Red Car system. Remainder of parcel is utiliz,ed as the Park N Ride. 3. APN 8554-001-901,904,907* 22,500 square feet (0.52 acre) consisting of 3 adjacent parcels along Ramona Boulevard, north of City Hall area, currently used for Police Department parking. 4. APN 8554. 001-910: 7,200 square feet (0.17 acre) Property is unimproved, and is located on Maine Avenue south of Ramona Boulevard, adjacent to City Hall. 5. APN 8553-011-901, Approx. 28,370 square feet (.65 acre) City owned parcels are partially unimproved, used as public parking area and at Maine Avenue, Pacific Avenue and Sterling Way. The total area for the above parcels is approximately 153,644 square feet (3.53 acres). All of parcels are located within or immediately adjacent to the community's downtown. Lidgard Associates prepared an appraisal (dated November 19, 2010) of the City-owned Park-N-Ride property, also adjacent to the downtown area, showing a value of $1,950,000, which is approximately $30 per square foot. Staff is using that appraisal to determine the aggregate value for the subject parcels as shown below: Subject City/CDC-Owned Parcels (153,644 Square Feet @ $30) = $4,609,332 In addition to the purchase of those City-owned parcels, Staff is also proposing the CDC, again through use of its LMIHTF, acquire an easement from the City for at least 25 parking spaces in the proposed parking structure to be built at the Civic Center. Staff has determined there is not enough room to develop affordable units with sufficient and required parking at APN 8554-001-901, 904, 907, the third parcels listed above. Acquisition of the parking easement will allow for development of parking for those affordable units, as well as improve the marketability of those affordable housing units. Value of the easement is estimated at $16,000 per parking space, which is the estimated construction cost, for a total value of $400,000. Total acquisition cost for the land and the parking easement is $5,009,332. Attached are the purchase agreement and parking easement agreement for the proposed sale of City-owned parcels and parking spaces to the CDC. Staff is also recommending the funds received by the City be set-aside in a separate fund City-Owned Parcels January 25, 2011 Page 3 of 3 to be used for community development or redevelopment purposes only. FISCAL IMPACT There is no negative impact to the City's General Fund. There are sufficient funds within the CDC's LMIHTF for the proposed acquisition of the subject City-owned parcels and parking easement. As the Council and Board Members are aware, in his proposed budget the Governor Is recommending the elimination of redevelopment agencies. It is believed the Legislature is working on some sort of urgency legislation, which may prevent the redevelopment agencies from taking actions to protect their assets. We do not know if any legislative changes would be implemented and if they are what they may be. However, staff believes, as do many agencies throughout the State and the California Redevelopment Association, taking appropriate actions immediately to protect the local community's assets against any adverse action the State may implement is important. Staff further believes the California voters have agreed such protections should be implemented through the passage of Propositions 1A and 22. Staff recommends the City Council: 1. Authorize the Mayor to execute the sale/purchase agreement and parking easement agreement on behalf of the City forthe CDC's acquisition of the parcels listed in this report for affordable housing development purposes and the parking easement. 2. Authorize the Executive Director to purchase the parcels as listed in this report and execute the sale/purchase agreements and parking easement agreement with the City of Baldwin Park for the acquisition of the parcels and parking easement and pay $5,009,332 to the City of Baldwin Park from the LMIHTF for affordable housing development purposes and the parking easement. 3. Authorize the Finance Director to set aside the amount of $5,009,332 ia separate fund restricted for future 7 development or redevelopment of the community. ATTACHMENT: Attachment #1 - Assessor Parcel Maps for City-Owned Parcels Attachment #2 - Purchase Agreement and Parking Easement Agreement L . RE ctg1� k3 �O N4 `ir 5py ~V�4 }V N a 6L. LLI z4' b"L Q f'e 1 O �V i U) < C V LS N )r iOW W �p^ 09 W� O • • • !i a A y, N CJ yW �� O N F Ln O 23 a 4 U� q4 N W U LS N )r iOW W �p^ 09 W� O • • • !i a A y, N CJ yW �� O N F Ln O 23 a 4 d �o ou 4M. t +qqy5d�{ tt CHCii IV 2 $ ZAVi 310t MI hCSiB t3ZOt J5 V ¢f 11303.M7 .N+Ali7 jk \y tt .StN ► S JL x i T � �i i Pig NP P ¢ e �Y 3N1Nmoo T71 co pN1. N r! W h W j� 6��p3 w� t � t t Z ���°*66jj tN �d� � YVVt 4 q6� �4a'66o 4 Y w 4 u x� W n N OL d'i W n a 4 O E ^+W p rs - n 1 a x1 �, 14 X41 `� LO LO Oo 4 z 0 % |/X J {� !� ^ � \ 3AV 4 z 0 % |/X J {� !� ^ � \ I A I -i • i� by and between The City of Baldwin Park M3 Community Development Commission of the City of Baldwin Park. 1 of 12 THIS PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR REAL PROPERTY ( "Agreement ") is entered into by and between the CITY OF BALDWIN PARIS, a municipal corporation (hereinafter called "City") and the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PART,, a public body, corporate and politic (hereinafter called "CDC "), for the purchase by CDC of certain real property as hereinafter set forth. RECITALS A. City is the o`vner of certain real property generally described as five (5) parcels of a combined size of approximately 3.53 acres (legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full) (the =Property ") as well as tweuty -five (25) parking spaces in the to be provided in the parking structure City will be constructing behind City Hall (tine `Parking Spaces "). B. The Property is currently excess land City and CDC desire to be used for affordable housing. The Parking Spaces are needed for the affordable housing to be developed on Parcels with APN 8554 - 001 -901, 904, 907. C. City desires to sell and CDC desires to buy the Property and use of the Parking Spaces pursuant to the terms, provisions and conditions herein. I. SUBJECT OF THIS AGREEMENT FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and adequacy of which are acknowledged, City and CDC hereby agree as follows: A. Purpose of this Agreement City agrees to sell and CDC agrees to purchase the Property and use of the Parking Spaces and (i) all rights appurtenant thereto, (ii) all improvements on and to the Property (iii) all sewer and utility rights allocated to the Property, (iv) all right, title, and interest of City in and to any roads, streets and ways, public or private, serving the Property, (v) appurtenances to the Property and (vi) all rights and entitlements to development of the Property granted by governmental or quasi - governmental bodies or entities having jurisdiction or authority over the Property. B. The Property The Property consists of Parcel I which is approximately thirty thousand six hundred and seventy (30,670) square feet, Parcel 2 which is approximately sixty four thousand nine hundred and forty (64,940) square feet, Parcel 3 which is approximately twenty two thousand five hundred (22,500) square feet, Parcel 4 which is approximately seven thousand two hundred (7,200) square feet, Parcel 5 which is approximately 28,370 square feet (28,370) square feet, all as further described on Exhibit A. C. Parties to this Agreement 2of12 1. City City is a municipal corporation. The principal office of City is located at 14403 East Pacific Avenue, Baldwin Park, CA 91706. "City" as used in this Agreement, includes City, and any assignee of or successor to the rights, powers and responsibilities of City. CDC is a public body, corporate and politic. The principal office of CDC is located at 14403 East Pacific Avenue, Baldwin Park, CA 91706. "CDC" as used in this Agreement, includes CDC, and any assignee of or successor to the rights,.powers and responsibilities of CDC. If. AGREEMENT TO SELL AND PURCHASE In accordance with, subject to, and conditioned on all terms, covenants, and conditions of this Agreement, CDC agrees to sell the Property to the City and the City agrees to acquire the Property from CDC for the consideration set forth herein. A. Purchase Price City's purchase price for the Property shall be Nine Hundred Twenty Thousand One Hundred Dollars ($920,100.00) for Parcel 1, One Million Nine Hundred Forty Seven Thousand One Hundred Thirty Two Dollars ($1,947,132.00) for Parcel 2, Six Hundred SeventyFive Thousand Dollars ($675,000.00) for Parcel 3, Two Hundred Sixteen Thousand Dollars ($216,000,00) for Parcel 4, Eight Hundred Fifty One Thousand One Hundred Dollars ($851,100.00) for Parcel 5, and Four Hundred Thousand Dollars ($400,000.00) for use of the Parking Spaces (the "Purchase Price). The City shall pay the Purchase Price to the CDC at the time and in the manner and form set forth herein. B. Payment of the Purchase Price City shall pay the Purchase Price within one business day of CDC's receipt ofproof of City's recordation of the Grant Deeds (as defined below) conveying the Property to CDC and the Easement Deed (as defined below) conveying an casement for CDC's use of the Parking Spaces. III. CONVEYANCE A. Transfer of Property In accordance with and subject to all the terms, covenants and conditions of this Agreement, CDC agrees to convey Property to City, and City agrees to accept Property from CDC. 3 of 12 B. Form of Grant Deeds and Easement Deed City shall convey to CDC title to the Property, in the condition of title provided in Subsection C., below, by individual grant deeds conforming in form and substance to the farm attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit B (the "Grant Deeds "). City shall convey to CDC an easement for use of the Parking Spaces (the "Easement ") by an easement deed conforming in form and substance to the form attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit C (the "Easement Deed "). C. Condition of Title City shall convey to CDC the Easement and fee simple title to Property free and clear of all recorded liens, encumbrances, assessments, easements, leases and taxes, subiect to (a) those as set forth in this Agreement and included in the Grant Deed; (b) those exceptions identified in Title Preliminary Report dated , Order No. ; and (c) those which are otherwise consistent with this Agreement. Title to the Property shall be subject to the exclusion therefrom (to the extent now or hereafter validly excepted and reserved by the parties named in deeds, leases and other documents ofrecord) of all oil, gas, hydrocarbon substances and minerals of every kind and character lying more than five hundred (500) feet below the surface, together with the right to drill into, through, and to use and occupy all parts of Property lying more than five hundred (500) feet below the surface thereof for any and all purposes incidental to the exploration for and production of oil, gas, hydrocarbon substances or minerals from the Property, to the extent not owned by City, but without, however, any right to enter upon, use or disturb either the surface of the Property or any portion thereof within five hundred (500) feet of the surface for any purpose or purposes whatsoever. All references to conveyance of title in this Agreement shall also mean delivery ofpossession .,n :nI- G. referred to ,�, f„rs S;zbsectiorn as the context may require. D. Time for and Place of Delivery of the Grant Deeds and Easement Deed Subject to any mutually agreed upon extension of time, City and CDC shall signthe Grant Deeds and Easement Deed, within five (5) business days after this Agreement is singed and City shall provide proof of recordation of the Grant Deeds and Easement Deed within five (5) business days after they are signed. E. Recordation of the Grant Deeds City shall file the Grant Deeds forrecordation among the land records in the Office of the County Recorder for Los Angeles County. F. Title Insurance. Concurrent with the recordation of the Grant Deeds, a title insurance company satisfactory to CDC and City ("Title Co. ") shall provide and deliver to City an ALTA title insurance policy issued by the Title Co. insuring that title to the Property is vested in City in the condition required by this Agreement. The Title Co. shall provide City with a copy of the title insurance policy. The title insurance policy shall be in the amount of the Purchase Price. CDC shall pay for all premiums, including those for any extended coverage or special endorsements. 4of12 G. Taxes and Assessments. All ad valorem taxes and assessments levied, assessed or imposed for any period prior to conveyance of title to the Property shall be paid by City. H. Occupants ofProperty. City agrees title to the Property shall be conveyed free of any possession or right of possession, L Condition of the Property: Hazardous Substance Disclosure, Release and Indemnity. The Property shall be delivered from City to CDC in an "as is" condition. City reprasents to the, best of its-actUal knowledge, the Property does, not curm contain t v n tain any Hazardous Substances, CDC shall be solely responsible for all necessary testing of the Property for hazardous materials pursuant to all applicable laws, statutes, riles and regulations. For purposes of this Agreement, "hazardous materials" shall mean asbestos; polychlorinated biphenyls (whether or not highly chlorinated); radon gas; radioactive materials, explosives; chemicals known to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity-, hazardous waste, toxic substances or related materials; petroleum and petroleum product, including, but not limited to, gasoline and diesel fuel; those substances defined as a "Hazardous Substance ", as defined by Section 9601 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. 9601, et seq., or as "Hazardous Waste" as defined by Section 6903 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. 6901, et seq.; an "Extremely Hazardous Waste," a"'Hazardous Waste" or a "Restricted Hazardous Waste," as defined by The Hazardous Waste Control Law under Section 25115, 25117 or 251223 of the California Health and Safety Code, or is listed or identified pursuant to Sect—ion 25140 of the California Health and Safety Code; a "Hazardous Material", "Hazardous Substance," "Hazardous Waste" or "Toxic Air Contaminant" as defined by the California Hazardous Substance Account Act, laws pertaining to the underground storage of hazardous substances, hazardous materials release response plans, or the California Clean Air Act under Sections 25316, 25281, 25501, 25501.1 or 39655 of the California Health and Safety Code; "Oil" or a "Hazardous Substance" listed or identified pursuant to 311 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. 1321; a"Razardous Waste," "Extremely Hazardous Waste" or an "Acutely Hazardous Waste" listed or definedpursuant to Chapter 11 of Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations Sections 66261.1 - 66261.126-, chemicals listed by the State of California under Proposition 65 Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 as a chemical known bythe State to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity pursuant to Section 25249.8 of the California Health and Safety Code; a material which due to its characteristics or interaction with one or more other substances, chemical compounds, or mixtures, materially damages or threatens to materially damage, health, safety, or the environment, or is required by any law or public CDC to be remediated, including rernediation which such taw or government CDC requires in order for the property to be put to the purpose proposed by this Agreement; any material whose presence would require remediation pursuant to the guidelines set forth in the State of California Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Field Manual, whether or not the presence of such material resulted from a leaking underground fuel tank; pesticides regulated under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.; asbestos, PCBs, and other substances regulated under the Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.; any 5 of 12 radioactive material including, without limitation, any `{source material," "special nuclear material," "by- product material," "low -level wastes," "high -level radioactive waste," "spent nuclear fuel" or "transuranic waste" and any other radioactive materials or radioactive wastes, however produced, regulated under the Atomic Energy Act, 42 U.S.C. 2011 et seq., the Nuclear Waste Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. 10101 et seq., or pursuant to the California Radiation Control Law, California Health and Safety Code, Sections 25800 et seq.; hazardous substances regulated under the Occupational Safety and Health Act, 29 U.S.C. 651 et seq., or the California Occupational Safety and Health Act, California Labor Code, Sections 6300 et seq.; and/or regulated under the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. or pursuant to The California Clean Air Act, Sections 3900 et seq. of the California Health and Sa fetYY Code Amr etudieS and reports generated by City's te.ctir cr fnr h arrinii mat r; nie shall be made available to City upon City's request. If the soil, water nr material conditions of the. Property, or anyInn t #hereof, including without limitation hazardous materials, are not in all respects entirely suitable for the use or uses to which the Property will be put, then it is the sole responsibility and obligation of CDC to take such action as may be necessary to place the Property and the soil, water and material conditions thereof in all respects in a condition entirely suitable to the use or uses to which the Property will be part. M. PreliminM Work By CDC. Upon the execution of this Agreement and prior to the conveyance of title to the Property to CDC, representatives of CDC shall have the right of access to and entry upon the Property, at all reasonable times for the purpose of obtaining data and making surveys and tests necessary to carry out this Agreement. CDC agrees to and shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, contractors and agents' from and against all claims, liability, loss, damage, costs or expenses including reasonable attorneys' fees and court costs) arising fiom or as a result of the death of any person or any accident, injury, loss or damage whatsoever caused to any person or the property of any person which shall occur on or adjacent to the Property, or in connection with the activities of CDC, its officers, employees, contractors or agents, performed and conducted on the Property pursuant to this Subsection J., and which shall be directly or indirectly caused by the acts, errors or omissions of CDC or its officers, employees, contractors or agents. IV. APPROVAL OF THIS AGREEMENT Agreement Subject to City and CDC's Discretion, This Agreement is expressly subject to and contingent upon City's and CDC's approvals and written acceptances which may only occur if approval and authorization is granted by the governing bodies of each at a duly noticed public meeting, in each of their sole discretion and after conducting such procedures as may be required by law for the purchase of the Property. V. NO EFFECT ON DUTIES TO CLOSE DUE TO CHANGES PRIOR TO CLOSING Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, any change in circumstances following full execution of this Agreement of any kind or nature whatsoever including, but not limited to, any 6of12 increase or decrease in the value of the Property, the discovery of any new or unknown facts (except as noted in this Agreement), changes in statutory or case law, any allegation of mistake of fact or any allegation of mistake of law does not and shall .not affect the duties of the parties herein to close the transactions set forth in this Agreement and does not and shall not affect the enforceability of this Agreement. VI. DEFAULTS AND REMEDIES A. Defaults -- General. Subject to the extensions of time set forth herein, failure or delay by either party to perform any term or provision of this Agreement constitutes a default under this Agreement. The party who fails or delays must immediately, upon receipt of written notice as specified below, co_ntmence to cure, correct or remedy such failure or delay and shall complete such cure, correction or remedy with reasonable diligence, and during any period of curing shall not be in default, provided that in any event the default shall be cured by thirty (30) days. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a failure or delay in performance by one party would cause the other party to be in default under a written agreement with an unrelated third party, then if such failure or delay is not corrected within thirty (30) days after written notice, the non - defaulting party may take reasonable steps to minimize its liability to such third party or other damage as a result of such failure or delay, and the defaulting party will be liable for the reasonable casts thereof. The injured party shall give written notice of default to the party in default, specifying the default complained of by the injured party. Failure or delay in giving such notice shall not constitute a waiver, of any default, nor shall it change the time ofdefault. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, any failures or delays by either party in asserting any of its rights and remedies as to any default shall not operate as a waiver of any default or of any such rights or remedies. Delays by either party in asserting any of its rights and remedies shall not deprive either party of its right to institute and maintain any actions or proceedings which it may deem necessary to protect assert or enforce any such rights or remedies. If a monetary event of default occurs, prior to exercising any remedies hereunder, then the injured party shall give the party in default written notice of such default. The party in default shall have a period often (10) calendar days after such notice is received or deemed received within which to cure the default prior to exercise of remedies by the injured party. If a non - monetary event of default occurs, prior to exercising anyr)amedies hereunder, then the injured party shall give the party in default notice of such default. If the default is reasonably capable of being cured within thirty (30) calendar days after such notice is received or deemed received, the party in default shall have such period to effect a cure prior to exercise of remedies by the injured party. If the default is such that it is not reasonably capable of being cured within thirty (30) days, and the party in default (1) initiates corrective action within said period, and (2) diligently, continually, and in good faith works to effect a cure as soon as possible, then the party in default shall have such additional time as is reasonably necessary to cure the default prior to exercise of any remedies by the injured party, but in no event longer than ninety (90) days after the 7of12 date the first notice of default is given. In no event shall the injured party be precluded from exercising remedies if its security becomes or is about to become materially jeopardized by any failure to cure a default. B. Institution of Legal Actions. In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may institute legal action to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purpose of this Agreement. Such legal actions must be instituted in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, State of California, in any other appropriate court in that county, or in the Federal District Court in the Central District of .lI al �UVLLLIA. C. Applicable Law. The laws of the State of California shall govern the interpretation and entbrMement of this Agreement. D. Aeceotance of Service ofprocess. In the event any legal action is commenced by CDC against City, service of process on City shall be made by personal service upon the City's Chief Executive Officer, or in such other manner as may be provided by law. In the event any legal action is commenced by City against CDC, service ofprocess on CDC shall be made by personal service upon CDC's Executive Director or in such other manner as may be provided by law. E. Ri its and Remedies Are Cumulative. Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative, and the exercise by either party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party. F. Damages. I£ either party defaults with regard to any of the provisions of this Agreement, then the nondefaulting party shall serve written notice of such default upon the defaulting party. If the default is not commenced to be cured in accordance with Section VI after service of the notice of default and is not cured promptly in a continuous and diligent manner within a reasonable period of time after commencement, then the defaulting party shall be liable to the nondefaulting party for actual damages caused by such default, and the nondefaulting party may thereafter (but not before) commence an action for actual damages against the defaulting party with respect to such default. Indirect and consequential damages shall not be sought by either party; except that, (i) if a defaulting party commits willful misconduct or fraudulent acts or omissions, the nondefaulting party can seek punitive and consequential damages against the defaulting party and (ii) the nondefaulting party can seek consequential damages if the defaulting party has materially breached this Agreement and such breach was not due to causes beyond the reasonable control of the defaulting party. 8of12 G. Specific Performance. If either party defaults with regard to any of the provisions of this Agreement, then the nondefaulting party shall serve written notice of such default upon the defaulting party. If the default is not commenced to be cured within thirty (30) days after service of the notice of default and not cured promptly in a continuous and diligent manner within a reasonable period of time after commencement, then the nondefaulting party, at its option, may thereafter (but not before, unless necessary to prevent immediate harm) commence an action for specific performance of the terms of this Agreement pertaining to such default. VII¢ CONFLICT OF INTEREST No member, official or employee of City or CDC shall have any direct or indirect interest in this Agreement, nor shall such member, official or employee participate in any decision relating to the Agreement which is prohibited by law. VII. INDEMNIFICATION A. Non-liability of Ci y or CDC Officials and Employees for Default No member, official or employee of City shall be personally liable to CDC, or any successor in interest, or anyone else as a result of any default or breach by City for any amount which may become due to CDC or successor or on any obligations under the terms of this Agreement. No member, official or employee of CDC shall be personally liable to City, or any successor in interest, or anyone else as a result of any default or breach by CDC for any amount which may become due to City or successor or on any obligations under the terms of this Agreement. B. City's Indemnifications, Tenant Claims City agrees to and shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless CDC and each of its officers, employees, contractors, and agents, from and against all claims, liability, loss, damage, costs or expenses (including reasonable attorney's fees and court costs) ( the "Claims ") arising from or as a result of any claims made after the conveyance of theFroperty based upon or arising from anyclaims of possession ofthe Property, that pre - existed that conveyance pursuant to this Agreement. IX. MISCELLANEOUS A. Entire Agreement This Agreement integrates all of the terms and conditions mentioned herein or incidental hereto, and supersedes all negotiations or previous agreements between the parties with respect to all or part of the subject matter hereof. None of the terms, covenants, agreements or conditions set forth in this Agreement shall be deemed to be merged with the Grant Deeds of the Easement Deed, and this Agreement and the obligations of the parties shall remain in full force and effect until the conveyance of the Property. All waivers of the provisions of this Agreement must be in writing and signed by the appropriate authorities of City and CDC, and all amendments hereto must be in writing and signed by the appropriate authorities of City and CDC. 9of12 B. Approvals Any and all approvals by City or CDC under this Agrecirzent or documents referenced hereunder shall be made promptly and in good faith and not unreasonably delayed or withheld and shall be exercised with a view toward implementing the purposes of this Agreement. C, Binding` Effect, Modifications and Counterparts This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the respective heirs, trustees, beneficiaries, successors, representatives and assigns of the parties. This Agreement cannot be modified, amended, changed or mviserr n�v�nPr�,t r�vaaarritin pvar�t IfAA by Pae-1, nfttae. t%attieeh rein `f'hic A orppment tnavh� e_ ecute-d b, a in one or more counterparts and, when executed by each of the parties signatory hereto, shall_ be binding on all of the parties hereto even though each of the signatory parties may have executed separate counterparts hereof D. Governing Law This Agreement and the interpretation hereof, shall be governed by and in accordance with the procedural and substantive laws of the State of California as to all matters. E, Severability If one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement shall for any reason be held invalid, illegal, void or unenforceable for any reason whatsoever, then such provision shall be stricken and of no force or effect. The provision, terms or words to be stricken shall be as limited as permissible by law and shall not affect, impair or invalidate any other provision of this Agreement. If a provision of this Agreement shall be deemed invalid due to its scope and breadth, then such provision shall be deemed valid to the extent of the scope or breadth permitted bylaw. The remaining terms and provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect and, to the extent required, shall be modified to preserve their validity. F. Interpretation This Agreement shall not be construed in favor of or against a party by reason of its participation or lack of participation of that patty or its counsel in drafting this Agreement and/or any provision or term of this Agreement and/or any Exhibit attached hereto. This Agreement shall be interpreted and construed as if dra Red by all parties with equal participation in the drafting hereof. G. Attorneys Fees and Costs In the event anyparty institutes a proceedingunder this Agreement, the prevailing party shall, in addition to such other relief as may be awarded, be entitled to recover, as an element of its costs (and not as damages), attorney's fees, expenses and costs actually incurred with such proceeding. H. Waiver A waiver of a breach by any party hereto in'any one instance shall not constitute a waiver of any prior or subsequent breach, whether or not similar. I. Warranty of Authority and Consents. Each party hereto represents and warrants that the partyhas the right, power, legal capacity and authority to enter into and perform the 10 of 12 obligations set forth in this Agreement and that no approvals or consents or any persons, firms, corporations or entities are necessary in conjunction with saine. J. No Benefit to Third Parties. Except as otherwise specifically provided herein, this Agreement is not intended for the benefit of any third party. K. Recitals. The "Recitals" set forth in this Agreement constitute a material pm-t of this Agreement and are incorporated herein, and, to the extent necessary, required ofhelpfiit, shalt be considered in construing, interpreting and enforcing the terms and provisions of this Agreement. L. Exhibits. In the cVE:nt of any iijevieSiSsenCy or CCiruii...t 0peti'deen the cGx:xes and provisions of this Agreement and the terms and provisions of any Exhibit, the terms and provisions of said Exhibit shall be determinative and controlling. M. Effective Date This Agreement shall be effective as of the date on which it is signed on behalf of City. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement in duplicate original on the dates set forth herein below. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, _a municipal corporation 1 Dated: , 2011 By: ATTEST: Manuel Lozano, Mayor jv u a r wit" *l�L * 0��1 Laura M. Nieto, CMC Joseph W. Pannone Deputy City Clerk City Attorney [Signatures continued on Page 12] 11 of 12 Dated: _, 2011 ATTEST: Laura M. Nieto, CMC Secretary [Signatures continued from Page 11] COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF 13ALDWIN PARK, a public body, corporate and politic 53 Vijay Singhal, Executive Director APPROVED AS TO FORM Joseph W. Pannone General Counsel Attachments: Exhibit A: Legal Description Exhibit B: Form of Grant Deeds Exhibit C: Form of Easement Deed 12 of 12 Exhibit A Legal Descriptions PARCEL l: APN 8544 - 020°901, IN THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, COUNT Y VF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 8544 PAGE(S) 20 OF tk—rS, R14 THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAE) COUNTY. PARCEL 2: APN 8437 - 013 -905, IN THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 8437 PAGE(S) 13 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. =1 aea C APN 8554- 001 -901, 904, 907, IN THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALMORNLA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 8554 PAGE(S) 1 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. PARCEL4: APN 8554- 001 -910, IN THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 8554 PAGE(S) I OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. PARCEL 5: APN 8553 - 011 -901, IN THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK., COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 8553 PAGE(S) 11 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. Page 1 of I Exhibit B Foam of Grant Deeds Recorded at the request of Community Development Commission of the City of Baldwin Park, a public body, corporate and politic When Recorded "Mail to: Community Develop:rn.nt Commission of the City of Baldwin Park 14403 East Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, CA 91706 This document is recorded for the benefit of the Community Development Commission of the City of Baldwin Park on and is therefore exempt from the payment of the recording fee pursuant to Government code Section 6103 and from the payment of the documentary transfer tax pursuant to Revenge and Taxation Code Section 11922, Assessor's Parcel Number: - -_ FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, a municipal corporation hereby grants to the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, a public body, corporate and politic, all that real property in Baldwin Park, County of Los Angeles, State of California, as described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Dated this day of , 2011. Manuel Lozano, Mayor Page I of 1 EXHIBIT A 1112 U'llit4vas k , IN THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, COUNTY OF LOS TIA A PER MAP RECORDED) IN BOOK PAGE(S) �sltllo%jr�_nl�trkj'KIN , S OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. Page I of I EXHfBIT C Form of Easement Recorded at the request of Community Development Commission of the City of Baldwin Park, a public body, corporate and politic When Recorded Mall to: Community Development Commission of the City of Baldwin Park 14403 East Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, CA 91706 This document is recorded for the benefit of the Community Development Commission of the City of Baldwin Park on and is therefore exempt from the payment of the recording fee pursuant to Government code Section 6103 and from the payment of the dcc untentaey transfer tax pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 1 2422. AGREEMENT AND GRANT OF (EASEMENT This Agreement and Reservation of Access Easement( "Agreement'), dated January 25, 2011 for reference purposes only, is entered into by and between the CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, a municipal corporation ( "City") and the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, a public body, corporate and politic, ( "CDC ") with reference to the following facts: A. CDC and City have entered into to that certain Agreement of Purchase dated January 25, 2011 (the "Purchase Agreement ") pursuant to which City has agreed to convey to CDC the real property described in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and by this reference is incorporated herein, (the "CDC Property") and a parking easement to a parking structure (the "Parking Structure ") to be built on a City -owned parcel described in Exhibit B, which is attached hereto and by this reference is incorporated herein (the "City Parcel "). B. The parties now desire to enter into this Agreement for the purpose of reserving certain ingress and egress rights over and parking use rights on and over portions of the City Parcel to benefit the CDC Property. Such ingress, egress and. parking use rights will be located on, above and across the portions of the City Parcel. Page 1 of 4 NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the parties agree axfollows: \. Unless otherwise expressly stated mthe context requires, all capitalized terms used herein shall h*dnfioedxuiuthe Purchase Agreement. 2. Grant of Basement. City hereby grants and CDC hereby accepts, ooeach of their behalf and ou behalf uf each of their successors and assigns (as defined below) otmz easement for the perpetual right, privilege and authority for pedestrian and vehicular ingress and egress, twerity-four (24) hours per day, seven (7) days per week, over and across dcsignated portions of the Parkin g- Stru-CAuro andi %CiVy Parcel for the purposes of aQcessing the C%tyPucCul and Parking Structure for parking op10 twenty-five (I5) passenger vehicles of residents or in"i1ocnn[ residents ul low- 10 moderate-income households residing uu the CDC Property (the '9D1eum`',' 3. City Obligation to Maintain the Parking.Structute and City Parcel, City shall maintain the Parking Structure and City Parcel and all access routes over the Parking Structure and City Parcel in a good condition and in good working order at its sole cost and expense; provided, that other than reasonable wear and tear, any damages caused by CDC or its successor or assigns shal I be repaired by CDC or any of the Permittees. 4. Representations. City represents and warrants that auof the date this Agreement ior=oded(a) Cdxio the owner of the <�ityParcel, [b) City has not assigned or transferred or agreed to� ' ' �ortransfer any nf its right, title or interest {o and tuthe City Parcel oz any portion thereof -except for an access easement toYerizou'Californi4Thic`(c) City has the authority 1n enter into this Agreement, and (6) this Agreement iau valid and binding obligation upon City. 5^ Interference. Neither City nor any oI City's agents, employees, or contractors (collectively, the "City Pmlieo") shall materially interfere with the rights reserved to CDC herein (the "Interference"). This Agreement also includes the right at all times to remove all materials and debris which in interferes or may interfere with the rights reserved to CDC herein. City shall exercise due care bo carrying outooyvvodkvvitbimthuCityPoconluodPuzking Structure. City shall immediately take all necessary measures, at City's sole cost and expense, to eliminate any Interference which City has directly or indirectly caused and of which City is nodifiudmris otherwise aware. The provisions of this Paragraph 5 shall survive the termination of this Agreement. BxhUbt B Page 2of4 6. Notices, Whenever any party hereto shall desire to deliver to the other any notice, demand, request or other communication, each such notice, demand, request or other communication shall be in writing, shall be given by personal delivery, by registered or certified United States mail, return receipt requested, or by overnight courier, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: To CDC: Community Development Commission of the City of Baldwin Park 14403 East Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, CA 91706 9` 5. _ S 'R'.._ mss_.. Attn: Vijay Singnar, Executive D1*reC t0r To City: City of Baldwin Park i4403 East S 1 xc Avenue Baldwin Park, California 91706 Attn: Vijay Singhal, Chief Executive Officer Any such notice,. demand, request or other communication shall be deemed effective on the day of actual delivery or refusal to accept as shown by the addressee's return receipt. If the date on which any notice required to be delivered hereunder falls on a weekend or legal holiday, then such notice may be delivered on the next business day immediately following such weekend or holiday. The foregoing addresses may be changed by notice given in accordance with this Paragraph 6. 7. Default and Remedies. If either party fails to perform any of the terms, covenants and agreements contained herein, if such failure continues for a period of thirty (30) days after written notice (provided such party shall have such extended period as may be required beyond the thirty (30) days if the nature of the failure is such that it reasonably requires more than thirty (30) days to cure and the party commences the cure within the thirty (30) day period and thereafter continuously and diligently pursues the cure to completion), then the non - defaulting party shall be entitled to all remedies available to it at law or equity, including by way of example and not in limitation thereof, the right to sue such person for specific performance, injunctive relief and/or monetary damages, including without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees, costs and expenses. 8. Miscellaneous. 8.1 This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of CDC and its successors and each of the successor owners of the CDC Property. 8.2 This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted under the laws of the state of California. 8.3 If any action or proceeding is commenced by any party to enforce the terms of this Agreement, then the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other Exhibt B Page 3 of 4 party reasonable attorneys' fees and costs in addition to any other relief awarded by the court including fees and costs related to any appeal or a bankruptcy action of any kind. 8.4 As used in this Agreement, the term "including" shall mean including without limitation. Time is of the e.SSeDCe of this Agreement. The parties' respective rights and remedies under this Agreement are cumulative with and in addition to all other legal and equitable rights and remedies which the parties may have tinder applicable law. This Agreement maybe signed in counterparts. r-00 Yvz-lp-RE lo vyij..-L,�ESSWBER OF, this Agreement has been executed by the parties on the date and year first, written above. Kim OEM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF a municipal corporation BALDWIN PARK, a public body, corporate and politic By: Manuel Lozano, Mayor By: Vijay Singhal, Executive Director Exhibt D Pagc 4 of 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF COUNTY OF On , before me, > personally appeared , who proved to ripe on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in nisiner /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF P1ER3URY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public (Seal) ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF �Jklw_ f Oil before me, 5 personally appeared who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence, to be the person(s) whose name's) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in hisiber/their authorized capacity(ics), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State. of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public (Seal) EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION — CDC PROPERTY , IN THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN :BOOK � PAGE(S) OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, Page 1 of I EXHIBIT B LEGAL DESCRIPTION — CITY PARCEL , IN THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELP. STATE. OF CALLFOR1,411A., A Q PER ISAD T)vc--- y ( K lim TN R )r) p A OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. Page I of I 1874 A m 1 Wkic Im M A ' D.A. I E' • Alum vNit-41NIMMO11 M111 E*IRKI Honorable Chair and Members of the Commission Vijay Singhal, Chief Executive Officer — I january 5, _2011I ;93 STAFF REPORT SUBJECT- Transfer of Parcel owned by the Community Development L_ Commission within the Sierra Vista Area as an Asset of the Commission's Non-housing Fund to Become an Asset of the Commission's Low and Moderate Income Housing Funds. The purpose of this report is for the Community Development Commission of the City of Baldwin Park (CDC) to consider transferring a specific parcel within the Sierra Vista Project Area owned by the CDC and held as an asset of the CDC's non-housing money fund to be held as an asset of CDC's Low and Moderate Income Housing Trust Funds (LMIHT.F) for the- purposes -of developing affordable housing units and transferring money between those funds to reflect that transfer. There are a few CDC owned parcels that have potential for development. Throughout the years, CDC staff has made significant efforts to develop those parcels; however, due to their irregular shape, site, location, and market conditions, development of those parcels has not taken place. Staff believes transfer of one of those parcels as an asset of the CDC's non-housing money fund to an asset of the CDC's LM I HTF will allow that property to be developed as an affordable housing/mixed use development. N s The CDC continues to meet its requirements for affordable housing development in accordance with 5-Year Redevelopment and Housing Implementation Plan and as required by law. In order to assist with the development of underutilized CDC-owned parcels and to continue to meet or exceed affordable housing requirements, the CDC proposes to transfer a specific CDC-owned parcel within the Sierra Vista Area that is held as an assets of the CDC's non-housing money fund to be held as an asset of the CDC's LMIHTF. Commission-Owned Parcel January 25, 2011 Page 2 of 3 Lidgard Associates prepared an appraisal (dated November 19, 2010) of the City-owned Park-N-Ride property (a property in proximity to the parcels/assets being considered for transfer), showing a value of $1,950,000, which is approximately $30 per square foot. Staff is using that appraisal to determine the aggregate value of the assets to be transferred as discussed herein. While the parcel below is not in the downtown area, staff believes that its appraised value will be hinher hecaus-e of if- location. The nnr a1 in �1--- *Ie i1-10 freV,-,,,ay With eiv P—c— — W'.�11�3 UF I L I I MUCII greater visibility and access. However, absent an appraisal staff is using the value per Lidgard Associate's appraisal. The following is the assets1parcel being considered: 1, Sierra Vista - APN 8460-005-900: - CDC owned, unimproved parcel located on Garvey Avenue within the Sierra Vista Redevelopment Project Area along the 1-10 freeway. Currently vacant and sometimes used as material staging area by the City's Public Works Department. $629,100 (which is likely less that the property is actually worth due to its location adiacent to the 1 -10} The total area for the above parcel is approximately 20,970 square feet and .48 acres. Subject CDC-Owned Parcel (20,970 Square Feet @ $301 = $629;100 This transfer of this asset shall be accomplished through modifications to the CDC's accounts as determined necessary by the CDC's Treasurer and Executive Director. FISCAL IMPACT There is no negative impact to the CDC's General Fund. As the Council and Board Members are aware, in his proposed budget the Governor is recommending the elimination of redevelopment agencies, It is believed the Legislature is working on some sort of urgency legislation, which may prevent the redevelopment agencies from taking actions to protect their assets. We do not know if any legislative changes would be implemented and if they are what they may be. However, staff believes, as do many agencies throughout the State and the California Redevelopment Association, taking appropriate actions immediately to protect the local community's assets against any adverse action the State may implement is important. Staff further believes the California voters have agreed such protections should be implemented through the passage of Propositions 1A and 22. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the CDC authorize the CDC Treasurer and Executive Director to make the necessary changes to the CDC's accounts and budget to reflectthe transfer of the real property, described above, as an asset of the CDC's non-housing fund to Commission -Owned Parcel January 25, 2011 Page 3 of 3 bean asset of the CDC's LMIHTF and transferring $629,100 from the CDC's LMIHTF to the CDC's non - housing fund to reflect that asset transfer. � f,'[�:IJil _4i1 Attachment #1 - Assessor Parcel Map for Commission -Owned Parcel Assessor Parcel Maps for Commission -Owned Parcels q1t, t BALDWIN P - A - R•K TO: FROM: DA t E: SUBJECT- PURPOSE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Honorable Chair and Members of the Commission Vijay Singhal, Executive Director p Lorena Quijano, Director of Finance, january 25, 2011 Outstanding Loans from the Community Development Commission to the City of Baldwin Park To reaffirm the Community Development Commission's (Commission) outstanding debt to the City for loans for operation and administrative expenses, to obligate the payment of those loans from future available resources and to recommend the Commission consider the adoption of the attached Resolution in regards to the on -going obligation by the Commission to the City of Baldwin Paris. BACKGROUN DIDISC USSION Each Project Area within the Commission annually incurs operating and administrative expenditures necessary to maintain operations and to continue redevelopment efforts. Since the Commission has not had sufficient cash to pay for those expenditures, the City annually budgets and advances (loans) monies to cover those expenditures. The Commission is obligated to repay the amounts loaned with interest, which is based on the California Local Agency investment Fund (LAIF). The total obligation to the City is disclosed in the annual audited financial statements and the statement of indebtedness. The following is a summary of the outstanding balances owed as of June 30, 2010, to the City by the Commission: Principal Interest Total San Gabriel River $ 2,493,480 $ 468,075 $ 2,961,555 Puente Merced $ 1,123,856 $ 532,915 $ 1,656,771 West Ramona $ 51,693 $ 29,253 $ 80,946 Central Business District $ 2,861,798 $ 2,597,906 $ 5,459,704 Delta $ 260,170 $ 184,508 $ 444,678 Sierra Vista $ 6,452,177 $ 3,034,179 $ 9,486,356 Low Mod Income Housing $ 444,561 $ 81,019 $ 525,580 $ 13,687,734 $ 6,927,854 $ 20,615,588 Total Outstanding Loan January 25, 2011 Page 2 of 2 The Low - Moderate - Income Housing Trust Fund and the San Gabriel River, Central Business District, and the Sierra Vista Project Area's will be able to begin repayment of their loan in fiscal year 2010-2011; authorization to make those repayments has been submitted to the Commission in a separate report. However, it is necessary the remaining Project Area's also commit to begin repayment of their loans if there is available revenue in the individual Project Area funds. It is unknown as to how long !twill take the Commission to completely pay the City since the amount of tax increment to be received in the future will fluctuate based on property tax revenue actually received and if the State completely abolishes redevelopment agencies. REPM,�� It Is recommended the Commission begin the payment of all outstanding loans from available tax increment at the end of each fiscal year, after payment of banded and other superior indebtedness, and the Commission waive further reading, read by title only and adopt Resolution No. 461, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, REAFFIRMING THE OUTSTANDING LOAN IN THE AMOUNT OF $20,615,588 FROM THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK FOR ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES." ATTACHMENTS #I- Resolution and Loan Agreement RESOLUTION NO. 461 A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, REAFFIRMING THE OUTSTANDING LOAN IN THE AMOUNT OF $20,615,588 FROM THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK FOR ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A LOAN AGREEMENT AFFIRMING THE SAME _,,_A o t- WHEREMAOS, the D--lr4W:- Park Community I-eve' pment Comi-nission (the D"P.a H I d K ka IN Lj I t L, I I "Commission") has previously accepted loans from the City of Baldwin Park in order to be able to fund its administrative and operating expenses; and WHEREAS, the Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code sections 33000 et seq.) (the "Law") authorizes the Commission to borrow funds from the City in Furtherance of the Agency's activities and functions; and WHEREAS, the Fiscal Year 2010-2011 Loan Agreement documenting and reaffirming the outstanding loan balances is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and by this reference incorporated herein; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED BY THE COMMUNIT Y DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AS FOLLOWS, SECTION 1. As of the end of 2009-2010 Fiscal Year the outstanding loan balance was $20,615,588. SECTION 2. The actual loan (advance) from the City of Baldwin Park has varied on an annual basis and it has covered personnel expenses, miscellaneous expenses and professional services appropriated to the Commission for Administrative Expenses, and the Commission acknowledged, the loans constitute indebtedness of the Commission within the meaning of Article 6, Chapter 6, of the law. SECTION 3. As required by the Law, the Commission has filed annually with the City a detailed report of all its transactions with respect to the Commission's Administrative Expenses, including a statement of all revenues and expenditures. This requirement may be met by the filing of the report required by Section 33090.1 of the Law. SECTION 4. The Commission Executive Director is hereby authorized to execute the Loan Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit 'A" and all necessary documents to carry out the purpose and effect of this resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 251h day of January, 2011 Manuel Lozano, Chair ATTEST: ST. A -r-i f-- A . IFOr"VA I X.,O/ALI MN COUNTY OF LOS AN ELES SS. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK 1, LAURA M. NIETO, CMC, Secretary, does hereby certify the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly approved and adopted by the Community Development Commission of the City of Baldwin Park at a regular meeting of the Community Development Commission on January 25, 2011, by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSION MEMBERS. NOES: COMMISSION MEMBERS: ABSENT: COMMISSION MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSION MEMBERS: LAURA M. NIETO, CIVIC Secretary EXHIBIT "A" FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011 LOAN AGREEMENT F-.T--T4 -05 R MAN 5 U THIS AGREEMIENT -S an+=r ri infn this OP'h rjg!-,-- -.f 004 1 , 1- ��A ehvee- ... 1 - —e-11"U.", 4� UOY U; wwlucuy, r- I I Idy GUM I I the City of Baldwin Park, municipal corporation, (the "City") and the Baldwin Park k )p Community Development Commission, a public body, corporate and politic, (the " Commission") WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code Sections 33600 et seq, authorizes the Commission to borrow money or accept financial or other assistance from the City. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: K00-4-1 U wil IN SECTION 1. Amount of Loan. The City agrees it has loaned (advanced) the Commission a total of $20,615,589, including interest, as of June 30, 2010, related to staff and professional services to cover operational expenditures. The loan balances are reflected below and shall be increased by any loans made in fiscal year 2010-2011 and any other future loans that are made by the City to the Commission. SECTION 2. Disbursement of funds. The principal remaining balance the City has disbursed is $13,687,734 and it was disbursed for personneVprofessional services to the Commission. The Commission agrees it has used such proceeds only for the purposes provided for in the adopted annual budgets of the Commissions for previous fiscal years. Principal Interest Total San Gabriel River $ 2,493,480 $ 468,075 2,961,555 Puente Merced $ 1,123,856 $ 532,915 1,656,771 West Ramona $ 51,693 $ 29,253 $ 80,946 Central Business District $ 2,861,798 $ 2,597,906 $ 5,459,704 Delta $ 260,170 $ 184,508 $ 144,678 Sierra Vista $ 6,452,177 3,034,179 $ 9,486,355 Low Mod Income Housing $ 444,561 81,019 $ 525,580 Total Outstanding Loan $ 13,687,734 6,927,854 $ 20,615,588 SECTION 2. Disbursement of funds. The principal remaining balance the City has disbursed is $13,687,734 and it was disbursed for personneVprofessional services to the Commission. The Commission agrees it has used such proceeds only for the purposes provided for in the adopted annual budgets of the Commissions for previous fiscal years. SECTION 3. Interest. The Commission agrees to pay the City interest per annum at rate equal to the California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) annual rate. The total interest due as of June 30, 2010 is $6,927,854. SECTION 4. Repayment, The Commission agrees to repay any and all funds borrowed as soon possible and as soon as and to the extent there is tax increment revenue available after repayment of bonded and other superior indebtedness in the funding available to the individual Project Areas, Community Development Commission Oflhp(`, of Pn!r1wnPnrk- . .— citi -- i '' ' -" " a public body, corporate and politic F- IN Vijay Singhal, Executive Director City of Baldwin Park, a ll u n i Vi pal vUfpv doit :13 Manuel Lozano, Mayor TO: CITY OF BALDWIN PARK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION STAFF REPORr Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Honorable Chair and Members of the Commission Vijay Singhal, Executive Director (r) Lorena Quijano, Director of Financ4_14'.9, <, January 25, 20111 SUBjECA - Ir Repayment of P%mountS Owed by the Community Development Commission's Low- and Moderate-income Housing Fund To authorize the Community Development Commission (Commission) to repay a portion of the outstanding obligations from the Low- and Moderate-income Housing Trust Fund (LMIHTF). /: Outstanding Loan Obligation from the Commission to the City for Administrative Expenses Annually the Commission, including the LMIHTF, incur operating and administrative expenditures necessary to maintain their operations; however, on many occasions, there isn't sufficient cash to pay for these expenditures. In order to assist the Commission, including the LMIHTF, with operations and to continue redevelopment efforts, the City budgets and advances (loans) funds to cover some or all of those expenditures. The following is a summary of the outstanding balances owed as of June 30, 2010, to the City by the Commission: Principal Interest Total San Gabriel River $ 2,493,480 468,075 $ 2,961,555 Puente Merced $ 1,123,856 $ 532,915 $ 1,656,771 West Ramona $ 61,093 $ 29,253 $ 80,946 Central Business District $ 2,861,798 $ 2,597,906 $ 6,459,704 Delta $ 260,170 $ 184,608 $ 444,678 Sierra Vista $ 6,452,177 $ 3,034,179 $ 9,486,355 Low Mod Income Housing $ 444,561 $ 81,019 $ 625,680 Total Outstanding Loan $ 13,687,734 $ 6,927,864 $ 20,616,588 January 25, 2011 Page 2 of 3 Although the City budgets for annual advances (loans) the final amount due is determined at the end of each fiscal year. The annual amount is added to the total obligation and interest is added based on the California Local Agency investment Fund (LAIF), The total obligation to the City is disclosed in the annual audited financial statements and the statement of indebtedness. In the last couple of years the LMIHTF had sufficient monies for its operating and administrative expenses and, thus, did not need additional loans from the City. Therefore, it is recommended the following payment be made: It is recommended the outstanding loan amount of $525,580 be paid in full by the LMIHTF since it has available monies to repay its entire obligation to the City's General Fund. l/. Additional Obligation by the LMIHTF to the City The LMITHF currently owes an additional $2,873,421 to various City Funds as reflected in the audited financial statements (see attached copy of page 11 of the Commission's June 30, 2010 audited statements). The amount due is comprised of the following: Fund Description: Amount Owed Building Reserve (Fund 301) $2,576,008.00 San Gabriel River (Fund 831) $295,584.00 General Fund (Fund 10) $1,829.00 Total $2,873,421.00 The amounts owed to Building Reserve relates to the "Park Shadows," a low- and moderate-income condominium project that was constructed a number of years ago when the LMIHTF did not have sufficient monies to pay for the entire project. This amount will be designated for future economic development and redevelopment projects. Since the LMIHTF has available monies to repay its entire obligation in fiscal year 2010- 2011, it is recommended the total amount of $2,873,421 be paid in full to various funds noted above. FISCAL IMPACT As the Council and Board Members are aware, in his proposed budget the Governor is recommending the elimination of redevelopment agencies. It is believed the Legislature is working on some sort of urgency legislation, which may prevent the redevelopment agencies from taking actions to protect their assets. We do not know if any legislative changes would be implemented and if they are what they may be. However, staff believes, as do many agencies throughout the State and the California Redevelopment Association, taking appropriate actions immediately to protect the local community's assets against any adverse action the State may implement is important. Staff further believes the California voters have agreed such protections should be implemented through the passage of Propositions 1A and 22. January 25, 2011 Page 3 of 3 There are sufficient cash balances in the LMIHTF to cover these amounts. The total impact of the repayment of the loans to the LMlHTF is $3,399,001 comprised of the $525,580 plus $2,873,421 as discussed above. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended the City Council & Community Development Commission: 1. Repay a portion of the amounts owed as discussed above. 2. Authorize the Finance Director to set aside the amount of $2,575,008 in a restricted fund for future development or redevelopment of the community. ATTACHMENTS #1- Page 11, excerpt of the Commission's Audited Financial Statements Baldwin Park Community Development Commission Balance Sheet Governmental Funds June 30, 2010 Love! Moderate Income Debt Capital Houslnct SaMce Projects Tolar ASSETS Pooled cash and InvesVeents 5 8,888,016 $ 1,851,436 S 1,265,275 S 12,004,729 Cash and investments with fiscal agents - 2,071,938 - 2,071,938 Property tax and other receivables, net 10.830 423,713 139,394 573,937 Loans receivable 2,363,069 - 2,363,069 Me from other funds 1,631,981 825,957 1,158,746 3,516.683 Property held for resale, net 327,476 - 106,355 X833 Total assets 13,121 37! S 8,173,046 5 2,669,769 $ 20,184 189 LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES - Llabllkles Accounts payable and accrued 8abititles $ 4,286 S 265,341 S 23,464 $ 293,111 Unearned revenues 2,383,089 - - 2,363,069 m tI } Due to other funds 2,873,421 1,627,674 1,168,745 5,6%,840 4! TotalIlabliities 54240,776 1,893,015 1,ie2,228 8,318,020 Fund balances Reserved Property held for resale 327,478 10055 433,833 Debt service - 31280,031 - 3,280,031 Low and moderate Income housing 7,683,120 - 7,553,120 Unreserved 1,38i,185 1,38185 Total fund balances 7,880,698 3,280,031 1,467,540 12,646,169 Total IiabillUas and fund balances S 13,12i,374 $ 6,173,046 _ S2 689 769 S^ _ 20,984188 See notes to financial statements. 11 r= TO: FROM: DATE. SUBJECT: PURPOSE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Honorable Chair and Members of the Comm,_J ion Vijay Singhal, Executive Director C Lorena Qutiano, Director oy'Finance January 25, 2011 Repayment of Amounts Owed by the Community Development Commission to the Cltv for Administrative Loans To authorize the Community Development Commission (Commission) to repay a portion of the outstanding obligations from the San Gabriel River and Sierra Vista Project Area's to the City, . a . ___ � • p i 10441 • Annually the Commission incurs operating and administrative expenditures necessary to maintain its operations; however, in many occasions, the Commission does not have sufficient cash to pay for those expenditures. In order to assist the Commission with its operations and to continue its community redevelopment efforts, the City budgets and advances (loans) -funds to cover some or all of those expenditures. The following is a summary of the outstanding balances owed as of June 30, 2010, to the City by the Commission: Although the City budgets for annual advances (loans) the final amount due is determined at the end of each fiscal year, The annual amount is added to the total obligation and interest is added based on the California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAI F), The total obligation to the City is disclosed in the annual audited financial statements and the statement of indebtedness. Principal Interest Total San Gabriel River $ 2,493,480 $ 468,075 $ 2,961,555 Puente Merced $ 1,123,856 $ 532,915 $ 1,656,771 West Ramona $ 51,693 -$ 29,253 $ 80,946 Central Business District $ 2,861,798 $ 2,597,906 $ 5,469,704 Delta $ 260,170 $ 184,508 $ 444,678 Sierra Vista $ 6,452,177 $ 3,034,179 $ 9,486,355 Low Mod Income Housing $ 444,561 $ 81,019 $ 525,580 Total Outstanding Loan $ 13,687,734 $ 6,927,854 $ 20,615,588 Although the City budgets for annual advances (loans) the final amount due is determined at the end of each fiscal year, The annual amount is added to the total obligation and interest is added based on the California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAI F), The total obligation to the City is disclosed in the annual audited financial statements and the statement of indebtedness. E January 25, 2011 Page 2 of 3 Although some of the Project Areas have not had sufficient monies to repay the outstanding balances due to the City for operating and administrative expenses, it is recommended the following monies received during fiscal year 2010-2011 for the following Project Areas is used to repay the City: It is recommended the San Gabriel River Project make a repayment of $296,584 to the City. The San Gabriel River Project will receive this amount in fiscal year 2010- 2011 from a transfer of assets between from the Low- and Moderate-income Housing Trust Fund (LMIHTF) and this Project Area's non-housing fund (approval of this Dr payment by' - ' M"I H F was present- -'separately to 1:1- e C - - - - - • � - � - - e a L U t1hu L_ n lclu h Commission onlanuary 25, 2011). Alter I—n' outstanding ;can 'valance of $2,961,5jr-55 to Jter payment of this amount, the the City will decrease to $2,664,971. It is recommended that the Sierra Vista Project make a repayment of $3,491,1100 to the City. The amount was computed using the available cash balance of $2,862,000 as of January 2010 plus an additional $620,100 which the Project Area will receive for the transfer of assets between LMIHTF and this Project Area's non-housing fund (approval of this transfer was presented separately to the Commission on January 25, 2011). After this repayment of $3,491,100, the current outstanding loan balance of $9,486,355 to the City will decrease to $5,995,255 It is also recommended additional payment be made in this fiscal year if there are additional funds received by any of the Project Area by the end of the 2010-2011 fiscal year, FISCAL IMPACT As the Council and Board Members are aware, in his proposed budget the Governor is recommending the elimination of redevelopment agencies. It is believed the Legislature is working on some sort of urgency legislation, which may prevent the redevelopment agencies from taking actions to protect their assets. We do not know if any legislative changes would be implemented and if they are what they may be. However, staff believes, as do many agencies throughout the State and the California Redevelopment Association, taking appropriate actions immediately to protect the local community's assets against any adverse action the State may implement is important. Staff further believes the California voters have agreed such protections should be implemented through the passage of Propositions 1A and 22. The Commission will use monies received by the San Gabriel River and Sierra Vista Projects during fiscal year 2010-2011 to make the repayments referenced above. Therefore, there is no additional impact on these funds for the 2010-2011 fiscal-year. January 25.2D11 Page 3 of 3 |tis recommended the City Council &CoO1mUOhv Development Cp[DDlbssj0D: 1. Repay portion ofthe amounts owed aa discussed above. 4j�—� 2' Authorize the Finance Director to set aside the amount of $3,787,664 in a separate fund [$Sty{ched for future deva|0 7 ntnr redevelopment of the u0rnrDUDib/. a) E E U O O C LL y N c m m a O p C N a �y 0 > a) Ida 3 ->o J j Q ®� e • •C E C O N w U- m a) R c c a uy > Q E O C LL m N Ll tf y O N c C a) a R G > a) Q O L: L= = o Li c C N t6 U m G a) c m > a FD 4 O U C E O @ N LL C R G cu: N a V m C > O Q U O C N LL U N G c ) a m c IL Q L N > E 'C o t= 4 u_ U E2 a m c a) "m>O N R Q (7 U) C (D f L CCS c � c N LL o m z L}! L Q � IL a v z_ a t t � v J } CD L <L C O C U U LL h O O O N O N h ui m 01 M m n n v O to Or LO N La w C4 01 cl) CO m M co r � N ti LO eY O n N N O O M N O O N N N N O co tD o m co co n 00 In I cli co O n (f` N N Iq Le I LOO 1 N N O h O 0 co N N O O n n o M O 00 O O O O i,,- O in m W u> to LO LNl) r P O n N O d' O V' N r M N N n M N O O N O O O N 01 N h O O O CO b0 W O a) N N O (M olla�co co 00 cq 13i q CF� 01 Lol to 11 1001 (a N to II w o ai to Lo h c O n n v O to Or LO N La w C4 to cl) CO m M M O 01 It ri o th O to N 0 M LO CO m n CO O N N N O co tD 001 U[ co n 00 In 00 cli co Lk 00) N � N rn � La v O O to M N co @ O N C -' U R to �t O p J w to Lo U O O d -e N O U LL T F r r ca O N N N N M LL >- N � O aO h p1 O MmN Q N R 01 to N t0 01 J O Z o O 01 U � N W� m ti N O CL U rw Q � rc n OV a F- n n o M O 00 O O O O i,,- O in m W u> to LO LNl) r P O n N O d' O V' N r M N N n M N O O N O O O N 01 N h O O O CO b0 W O a) N N O (M olla�co co 00 cq 13i q CF� 01 Lol to 11 1001 (a N to II w M O n O O O r r I M tb N m er r O O 01 n tti h N W 0 n a0 O r M M a O M to O O N R Q N 0 c R O J U' t°- N 0 O O to Or w C4 to 00 r m M O O a0 00 0 a) t0 (D O. h _OO. O n N N O O 01 to M 01 co to N «) a) -' to �t m a0 co t0 CO Lo O O -e r N O N M M T 01 _ r N N N M V N aO h r MmN O 01 to N t0 01 et O CO O 01 -e N W� ti N N ttOn rw rc n OV 10 o h T M h d NC R G N J N N 0 U o N N R N N LL LL N O r N >- r u t°y <p LL T a M U O t0 t N O U) O D m R " 0 .O c C c _ J 0 U N w M O n O O O r r I M tb N m er r O O 01 n tti h N W 0 n a0 O r M M a O M to O O N R Q N 0 c R O J U' t°- N 0 ITEM NO. �5 Y SUBJECT: A REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND A SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT TO SPECIFIC PLAN 06 -01 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 51 UNIT SINGLE - FAMILY DETACHED GATED CONDOMINIUM PROJECT INCLUDING THE RELOCATION OF TWO WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES WITHIN THE R -1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 1) AND MU -2 (MIXED -USE 2) ZONES. ADDITIONALLY, THE PROJECT INCLUDES A REQUEST FOR A ZONE CHANGE TO APPLY THE SPECIFIC PLAN OVERLAY TO ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 8552- 017 -004. A RELATED REQUEST IS FOR A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO CONSOLIDATE TWELVE (12) LOTS OR PORTIONS THEREOF INTO ONE (1) LOT OF LAND FOR A 51 DWELLING UNIT RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION AND ONE (1) LOT OF LAND FOR A WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY WITHIN THE SAME ZONING DESIGNATIONS. LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BALDWIN PARK BOULEVARD AND MERCED AVENUE (LOCATION: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS: 8552- 017 -004, 8552 -017 -068, 069, 070, 071, 072, 073, 074, 075, 076, 077, AND 078); APPLICANT: KLL INVESTMENTS, LLC; CASE NUMBERS: Z -554, SP 1.4 -01, AND TM- 72195. SUMMARY This report requests City Council consideration and recommendation to the City Council for a mitigated negative declaration of environmental impact and a specific plan amendment to the Specific Plan (SP 06 -01) for the facilitation of a detached 51 unit, single - family, gated condominium project including the relocation of two wireless communications facilities within the R -1 (Single Family Residential 1) and MU -2 (Mixed -Use 2) zones, pursuant to Subchapter 153.210.660 of the City's Municipal Code. Additionally, the proposed project includes a zone change request to overlay Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 8552 -017 -004 with the Specific Plan (SP) Overlay pursuant to Subchapter 153.210.730 of the City's Municipal Code. A related request is for a tentative tract map to consolidate twelve (12) lots or portions thereof into one (1) lot of land for a 51 dwelling unit residential condominium subdivision and one (1) lot of land for the wireless communications facilities, pursuant to Table 152.10 in the City's Municipal Code. SP 14 -01, Z -554 and TM -72145 January 21, 2015 Paee 2 of 15 FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this item. RECOMMENDATION Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council open the public hearing and following the public hearing: 1) Adopt Resolution 2415 -047 entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR A ZONE CHANGE TO APPLY THE SPECIFIC PLAN (SP) OVERLAY TO ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 8552 - 017 -004, A SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT TO AN EXISTING SPECIFIC PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 51 -T WIT SINGLE- FAMILY DETACHED GATED CONDOMINIUM PROJECT INCLUDING THE RELOCATION OF TWO WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES, AND A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO CONSOLIDATE TWELVE LOTS OR PORTIONS THEREOF INTO ONE LOT OF LAND FOR A 51 -UNIT DETACHED RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNIT CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION AND ONE LOT OF LAND FOR A WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY WITHIN THE R -1, (SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) AND MU -2 (MIXED USE 2) ZONES. (LOCATION: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS: 8552- 017 -004, 8552- 017 -068, 069, 070, 071, 072, 073, 074, 075, 076, 077, AND 078; APPLICANT: KLL INVESTMENTS, LLC; CASE NUMBERS: Z -554, SP 14 -01 AND TM- 72195)" and 2) Introduce for first reading, by title only and waive further reading, Ordinance 1368, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ADOPTING THE FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING A ZONE CHANGE ADDING THE SPECIFIC PLAN (SP) OVERLAY TO THE PROPERTY IDENTIFIED WITH ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 8552- 017 -004 (APPLICANT: KLL INVESTMENTS, LLC; CASE NUMBER Z- 554)." and 3) Adopt Resolution 2015 -048 entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ADOPTING THE FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING A SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO CONSOLIDATE TWELVE LOTS OR PORTIONS THEREOF INTO NO MORE THAN TWO LOTS FOR A DETACHED 51 -UNIT DETACHED DWELLING UNIT RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY WITHIN THE R -1 (SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) AND MU -2 (MIXED USE 2) ZONES (LOCATION: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS: 8552- 017 -004, 8552 -017 -068, 069, 070, 071, 072, 073, 074, 075, 076, 077, AND 078; APPLICANT: KLL INVESTMENTS, LLC; CASE NUMBERS: Z- 554, SP 14 -01 AND TM- 72195)." • ' i 1 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITYACT (CEQA) In accordance with the provisions of the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA), it has been determined that the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment; however, there will not be a Q\Hmy\HMY WORD \Reports \Council Reports \SP 14 -01 Z -554 TM- 72195.doc SP 14 -01, Z -554 and TM -72195 January 21, 2015 Page 3 of 15 significant effect on the environment because revisions in the project have been made and agreed to by the Project Proponent. The Initial Study was prepared by RBF Consulting for the Planning Division and has completed the public review period which took place from October 23, 2014 to November 12, 2014. As a result of the information contained in the Initial study, a Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact has been prepared by RBF Consulting for final approval by the City Council (Attachment #4). No comments were received by the City on the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact. NOTICING A Notice of Public Hearing by the Planning Commission on the proposed Specific Plan Amendment, Zone Change and Tentative Tract Map was posted at, City Hall, Subject Site, Esther Snyder Community Center, and Barnes Park on January 7, 2015. Additionally, public hearing notices were mailed to all property owners within 300 feet of the subject site on January 7, 20 15. DISCUSSION KLL Investments, LLC has submitted an application for a specific plan amendment, a zone change, and a tentative tract map to facilitate the construction of a single - family, gated residential detached condominium project including: (a) fifty -one (51) detached residential dwelling units with two (2) car parking garages and private exterior yard areas; (b) 2,682 square feet of passive park use with an outdoor barbeque and seating area; (c) guest parking areas to accommodate a total of 18 vehicles; (d) common area landscaping, perimeter walls and gated vehicular /pedestrian community access; and (e) two (2) existing co- located wireless communications facilities to be relocated and collocated on a single stealth monopole (monoeucalyptus) structure along Baldwin Park Boulevard. The subject properties which encompass the project, have frontage along Merced Avenue, Baldwin Park Boulevard, and a small portion of Kenmore Avenue. The project site is located at the southwest corner of Baldwin Park Boulevard and Merced Avenue. Together, there are twelve (12) lots or portions thereof, that are subject to this request and all of the properties are currently owned by the Project Proponent. In total, the overall area of all the properties is approximately 158,994 square feet (3.65 acres). The table on the next page below identifies the subject properties current land use and zoning designation. TABLE #1 SUBJECT PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS ASSESSOR'S GENERAL PLAN PARCEL ZONING LAND USE LOT SIZE PROPERTY NUMBER RESIGNATION USE* 8552 -017 -004 R -1 Single - Family 7,000 s.f. Single - Family Residential Residential 8552 -017 -068 MU -2 Mixed Use 19,470 s.f. Religious /Church Use 8552- 017 -069 MU -2 Mixed Use 8,000 s.f. Store /Office 8552 -017 -070 MU -2 Mixed Use 7,000 s.f. Commercial Parking Lot 8552 -017 -071 R -1 Single - Family 11,975 s.f. Residential Undeveloped Residential Land Single -Family 8552- 017 -072 R -1 Residential 8,250 s.f. C:\Amy\AMY\WORD \Reports \Council Reports \SP 14 -01 Z -554 TM- 72195.doc SP 14 -01, Z -554 and TM -72195 January 21, 2015 Page 4 of 15 ASSESSOR'S ZONING GENERAL PLAN North MU -2 PARCEL ZONING LAND USE LOT SIZE PROPERTY NUMBER Single- Family Residential DESIGNATION MU -2 and RI USE* 8552 -017 -073 R -1 Single - Family 1.5,000 s.£ Religious /Church Use Residential 8552 -017 -074 R -1 Single - Family 6,600 s.f. Single - Family Residential Residential 8552 -017 -075 MU -2 Mixed Use 18,000 s.f. Religious /Church Use 8552 -017 -076 MU -2 Mixed Use 18,000 s.f. Single - Family Residential 8552 -01.7 -077 MU -2 Mixed Use 18,000 s.£ Private School o«-, 111 7 n78 O.JJG.-V 1 /-V / D , R-1 Single- Family 10 nn 10,VV 0 J.1. I Residential 'All lots are currently :vacant and strictures in process of demolition The overall site area is essentially flat. All structures on the properties are currently vacant and in the process of being demolished. Currently, several driveways access the project site from Merced Avenue, Baldwin Park Boulevard and Kenmore Avenue. Development of the Specific Plan, as amended, would limit access to one main gated access /egress driveway along Merced Avenue and an emergency access drive on Kenmore Avenue. TABLE #2 ADJACENT PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS PROPERTY LOCATION ZONING CURRENT LAND USE North MU -2 Commercial and Multi- Family Residential East RG and RI Single- Family /Multi- Family Residential South R1 Single- Family Residential West MU -2 and RI Commercial and Single - Family Residential ZONE CHANGE A zoning map provides a geographical representation of property land use classifications within a city. The City of Baldwin Park's Zoning Map is established through § 153.030.020 (Official Zoning Map) of the Zoning Code. Pursuant to § 153.210.730 (Amendment Initiation) of the Code, a request to change a zoning designation on any parcel in the City may be initiated by application of the property owner (among other options). This project includes a request to change the zoning of one property, identified as APN 8552 -017 -004, to include as part of the amended Specific Plan. The underlying zoning designation for this site, R -1, Single Family Residential, would remain unchanged; however, approval of the Zone Change request would add the specific plan overlay to the subject property so that it may be incorporated into the proposed development project. The original, underlying Specific Plan 06 -01 did not include this property within its boundaries. Since Specific Plan 06 -01's approval in October 2007, all properties located within the current specific plan area along with the lot represented by APN 8552 -017 -004 were purchased by the Applicant to be developed as proposed. SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT The Specific Plan SP 06 -01 was originally approved by the Baldwin Park City Council on January 17, 2007. At that time, the specific plan was envisioned to accommodate a two -story multi -use building with retail commercial and private educational uses, twelve (12) detached townhome units with respective common open CAAmy\AMrW0RDIReportslCound1 ReportslSP 14 -01 Z -554 TM- 72195.doc SP 14 -01, Z -554 and TM -72195 January 21, 2015 Page 5 of 15 space and guest parking areas and two (2) wireless communications facilities. It was subsequently amended on October 17, 2007 to eliminate requirements for undergrounding certain public utilities. This proposed amendment to SP 06 -01 (Attachment # 1, SP 14 -01), authorized under the California Government Code, is the regulatory mechanism that enables the construction of the proposed residential project. The specific plan amendment is written to accommodate land use (single- family residential and wireless communications facilities) and project design which may not be ordinarily allowed under the R -1, Single Family Residential and M -2, Mixed Use 2 Zones. The development standards written into the specific plan have taken into consideration the unique nature of this housing project. As this project consists of small -lot, zero lot line, single - family detached dwelling units, more flexible standards have been written into the specific plan. These standards would supersede the standards in the Zoning Code and existing SP 06 -01 for the subject site. A comparison is shown in the table below. TABLE #3 RELEVANT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS COMPARISON C.\HmyWMY\WORD \Reports \Council Reports \SP 14 -01 Z -554 TM- 72195.doc ZONING ZONING EXISTING PROPOSED STANDARD CODE CODE SP 06 -01 SP 14- 01(amendment) RI MU -2 Maximum Density 8.7 du/ac 30 du/ac 16.2 du/ac 14 du/ac Lot Area 5,000 s.f. 15,000 s.f. NA NA Lot Depth 50 ft. 100 ft. NA NA Lot Coverage 1 45% 60% NA NA Yard Areas Front 20 ft. 10 ft. 15 ft. NA Side 5 ft. 10 ft. 20 ft. 8 ft. one side /0 ft. one side Rear 20 ft. 15 ft. 35 ft. 8ft. Parking Required 2 garage spaces 2 garage spaces per du; plus one per du; plus one 2 garage spaces Residential Use additional additional garage per du 2 garage spaces per du garage space for space for 5+ 5+ bedrooms bedrooms Residential Use - Guest NA to detached NA to detached 9 spaces 18 spaces 5,025 s.f., 1,020 Common Open NA 100 s.f. /unit, 20 ft. depth & 29 2,682 s.£,77 ft. depth & 39 Space ft. min length ft. width ft. width minimum minimum Private Open Space 20% net lot area 36 s.f. /unit, 6 ft. One private One private yard per du min length balcony per du Building Height 27 ft. 35 ft. 32 ft. a stories 35 ft.; three stories max. Dwelling Unit Floor Areas 2- bedroom 1,050 s.f. 900 s.f. Not permitted Not permitted 3- bedroom 1,200 s.f. 1 100 s.f. 2,235 s.f. 2,000 s.f. gross C.\HmyWMY\WORD \Reports \Council Reports \SP 14 -01 Z -554 TM- 72195.doc SP 14 -01, Z -554 and TM -72195 January 21, 2015 Page 6 of 15 BUILDING HEIGHT AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN The proposed architectural theme is modern with straight lines, stucco, flat rooflines, cantilevers, and articulated volumes, walls and windows. Building mass is defined with three -story structures with garage access internal to the project, allowing for frontage along the public right -of -way that incorporates building cutouts and angular window treatments. The upper floors include the use of recessed balconies, cantilevers and trellis features. Proposed residential structures would be no more than three stories (35 feet) high. The two existing wireless communications facilities will be collocated onto one monopole designed to resemble a eucalyptus tree (monoeucalyptus). The structure will extend a maximum of 69 feet in height and will be stealthed /masked with additional landscaping consisting of mature live trees located adjacent to the facility. PARKING The specific plan provides for two garage parking spaces per unit for a total of 102 resident spaces. The Code currently requires two spaces per residential unit with two or more bedrooms. Therefore, the proposed parking for residents is consistent with Zoning Code requirements. A total of 18 additional parking spaces will be allocated as guest parking. The Zoning Code requires one guest parking space for every three (3) dwelling units. Based on the number of dwelling units proposed (i.e., 51 dwelling units), 17 parking spaces would be required. Overall, the parking for the proposed project is compliant with the City's Zoning Code with a total of 120 resident and guest parking spaces on -site. WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY Currently, the project site houses two operating wireless communications facilities —an AT &T facility and a Verizon facility. Existing facilities consist of fagade mounted antenna arrays affixed to the steeple of the abandoned church building. As part of the proposed specific plan amendment, these facilities would be relocated together onto a newly constructed cellular tower designed to resemble a eucalyptus tree (Attachment #2). The proposed mono - eucalyptus antenna tower, as discussed at the City Council Study Session held on September 3, 2014, would be 69 feet tall with a total of 24 antennas (three arrays of four antennas per facility) to accommodate both co- located wireless communications facilities. No additional wireless telecommunications facilities would be permitted to be co-located at this site. The mono - eucalyptus tower would be installed next to an existing Verizon equipment area along Baldwin Park Boulevard. An additional AT &T equipment area would be installed and a separate lot would be created to encompass the relocated facilities and mechanical equipment area. The wireless communications facility would be surrounded by a wall and landscaped with additional mature (living) trees, bushes and other landscape material to further screen the site and enhance the view from the public right -of- -way. Staff recommended landscape screening provisions for the wireless communications facility have been included and as a condition of approval to the proposed tract map. C:\Amy1AMY\WORD \Reports \Council Reports \SP 14-01 Z -554 TM- 72195.doc ZONING ZONING EXISTING PROPOSED STANDARD CODE CODE ' SP 06 -01 SP 14 -01 (amendment) Rl MU -2 >> 3 +- bedroom 200 s.f. each 200 s.f. each 2,235 s.f. 2,000 s.f. gross added bedroom added bedroom BUILDING HEIGHT AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN The proposed architectural theme is modern with straight lines, stucco, flat rooflines, cantilevers, and articulated volumes, walls and windows. Building mass is defined with three -story structures with garage access internal to the project, allowing for frontage along the public right -of -way that incorporates building cutouts and angular window treatments. The upper floors include the use of recessed balconies, cantilevers and trellis features. Proposed residential structures would be no more than three stories (35 feet) high. The two existing wireless communications facilities will be collocated onto one monopole designed to resemble a eucalyptus tree (monoeucalyptus). The structure will extend a maximum of 69 feet in height and will be stealthed /masked with additional landscaping consisting of mature live trees located adjacent to the facility. PARKING The specific plan provides for two garage parking spaces per unit for a total of 102 resident spaces. The Code currently requires two spaces per residential unit with two or more bedrooms. Therefore, the proposed parking for residents is consistent with Zoning Code requirements. A total of 18 additional parking spaces will be allocated as guest parking. The Zoning Code requires one guest parking space for every three (3) dwelling units. Based on the number of dwelling units proposed (i.e., 51 dwelling units), 17 parking spaces would be required. Overall, the parking for the proposed project is compliant with the City's Zoning Code with a total of 120 resident and guest parking spaces on -site. WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY Currently, the project site houses two operating wireless communications facilities —an AT &T facility and a Verizon facility. Existing facilities consist of fagade mounted antenna arrays affixed to the steeple of the abandoned church building. As part of the proposed specific plan amendment, these facilities would be relocated together onto a newly constructed cellular tower designed to resemble a eucalyptus tree (Attachment #2). The proposed mono - eucalyptus antenna tower, as discussed at the City Council Study Session held on September 3, 2014, would be 69 feet tall with a total of 24 antennas (three arrays of four antennas per facility) to accommodate both co- located wireless communications facilities. No additional wireless telecommunications facilities would be permitted to be co-located at this site. The mono - eucalyptus tower would be installed next to an existing Verizon equipment area along Baldwin Park Boulevard. An additional AT &T equipment area would be installed and a separate lot would be created to encompass the relocated facilities and mechanical equipment area. The wireless communications facility would be surrounded by a wall and landscaped with additional mature (living) trees, bushes and other landscape material to further screen the site and enhance the view from the public right -of- -way. Staff recommended landscape screening provisions for the wireless communications facility have been included and as a condition of approval to the proposed tract map. C:\Amy1AMY\WORD \Reports \Council Reports \SP 14-01 Z -554 TM- 72195.doc SP 14 -01, Z -554 and TM -72195 January 21, 2015 Page 7 of 15 IMPACT ON SCHOOLS AND PARKS A general concern about new residential development is the impact of such projects on schools and park facilities. The proposed residential development will result in an increase in the population at this location; however, this is not expected to significantly impact existing schools or parks. Based on the current average household population (4.36 pph) for the City of Baldwin Park provided by the U.S. Census Bureau, the proposed development could result in an additional 223 people. The Parkland In -Lieu development impact fee for this project is based upon a land appraisal submitted by the developer and determined based upon a formula provided in the Ordinance (Ordinance 1242). The fee will be used to off -set the potential impact of the proposed project on park and recreation facilities. Additionally, a one -time Development Fee would be collected by the Building Division at the time of plan check. This amount varies by the number of bedrooms per unit and would provide a fair -share contribution to the City for the project's impact on the City's backbone infrastructure. Each residence is required to have a private yard area for use by the residents. Additionally, the project will be served by an exterior residential common area with amenities that include hardscape amenities such as a courtyard, seating area and a barbeque. As for school impacts, the anticipated net impact of the project on school facilities should be minimal. If viewed as an isolated occurrence, the project could result in an estimated increase in population of up to 223 persons. Of those individuals it is anticipated that approximately 58 will be of school age (26% of the total number of persons between the ages of 5 -18 based on current demographic statistics). However, when demolitions are taken into consideration, the increase in school aged children can be considered a shift from one geographical area to another. Combined with the fact that school development fees of approximately $21,603 ($3.20 /s.£ for residential) will be paid to the Baldwin Park Unified School District, it is not anticipated that the impacts of this project on the school district would be significant. TR 4 FFTC T3W Engineering conducted a transportation analysis for the proposed Specific Plan Amendment. The analysis studied five (5) intersections: Merced Avenue and Ramona Boulevard, Baldwin Park Boulevard and Merced Avenue, Baldwin Park Boulevard and Ramona Boulevard, Baldwin Park Boulevard and Foster Avenue, and Vineland Avenue and Merced Avenue. These intersections were evaluated with different traffic scenarios: Existing Year 2014 With and Without Project Conditions; Projected Opening Year (2015) With and Without Project Conditions; and Forecast Year 2030 With and Without Project Conditions. In summary, the analysis determined that the proposed project is expected to generate 438 net daily trips on a typical weekday, of which 35 net trips are expected to occur during the morning peak hours of lam to 9am and 46 net trips are expected to occur during the evening peak hours of 4pm to 6pm. Project capacity and operational analysis show that all five intersections are expected to operate at an acceptable level of service (LOS), LOS D or better in both the morning and evening peak hours under all traffic scenario conditions. Details on the transportation analysis are included in the environmental documentation provided as Attachment #4. TRACT MAP The proposed subdivision by the Applicant includes: a lot line adjustment (currently in process) to carve out the area (one lot) to be utilized for the wireless communications facilities stealthed as a mono - eucalyptus; and a consolidation of the 11 remaining properties into one lot for a 51 unit detached residential condominium subdivision. Details relating to the lots are shown on Attachment 42. CAAmy1AMY\W0RD \Reports \Council Reports \SP 14 -01 Z -554 TM- 72195.doc SP 14 -01, Z -554 and TM -72145 January 21, 2015 . Paae 8 of 15 At this time the Applicant has submitted plans for development of the properties, which include a 51 unit single family detached gated condominium project with associated private and common open space and another lot to house two wireless carrier cell sites on a single mono - eucalyptus tree structure. As a condition of approval, any proposed structures shall be developed in compliance with the current development standards contained within the modified amended Specific Plan, (SP 14 -01) which is being heard in conjunction with the tentative tract map application. Several trees, which are designated `Mature Trees' through Subchapter 153.165 of the Municipal Code will be removed from the subject site. As such, a condition of approval of the tentative parcel map is included which requires the Applicant to submit a tree removal application for those trees which are defined as a `Mature Tree' in the `Tree Preservation and Protection' subchapter of the City's Municipal Code. REVIEW OF PROPOSED PROJECT BY OUTSIDE ENTITIES Once staff receives a tentative map for review, a request for continents /conditions on the proposed tentative map was sent to the following outside entities on June 5, 2014 as noted in the Table on the next page. TABLE #4 UTILITY COMPANY / OUTSIDE ENTITY LISTING NAME OF COMPANY/ ENTITY COMMENT LETTER RESPONSE RECEIVED DATE COMMENT/ RESPONSE RECEIVED Baldwin Park Unified School District No Verizon Telephone No LA County Sanitation District Yes— written June 25, 2014 LA County Fire Department Yes — written August 25, 2014 Southern California Edison No The Gas Company No Baldwin Park Postmaster No Time Warner Cable No Valley County Water District No Comments and conditions from the responding agencies have been addressed in the findings and are included, as applicable, as conditions of approval of the tentative parcel map. Additionally, staff includes a general condition of approval that any and all conditions from outside agencies and utility companies shall be met or provided for prior to finalizing the tentative parcel map. Accordingly, the proposed project, with the recommended conditions of approval, would have all necessary utilities. Pursuant to Section 152.12, no subdivision shall be approved unless those on -site and off -site improvements which are found by the City to be reasonably necessary to service the lots being created, are constructed or guaranteed to be constructed by the subdivider, which include, but are not limited to, the following improvements including adequate utility systems, water distribution, sewer, storm water drainage, public and /or private streets, traffic regulatory system, undergrounding of utilities, any other improvements found to be necessary by the City, and design of the subdivision. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION This item was heard by the Planning Commission at their December 10, 2014 meeting. At the meeting there were eight (8) individuals that spoke about the project proposal. Ultimately, the Planning Commission voted 5- CAAmy1AMY1WORD%ReportslCouncil Reports%SP 14 -01 Z -554 TM- 72185.doc SP 14 -01, Z -554 and TM- 72195 January 21, 2015 Page 9 of 15 0 recommending that the City Council: (a) adopt the mitigated negative declaration of environmental impact; (b) adopt the findings of fact and approve the zone change (Z -554); (c) adopt the findings of fact and approve the specific plan amendment (14 -01); and (d) adopt the findings of fact and approve the tentative tract map (TM- 72195) to consolidate twelve (12) lots or portions thereof into no more than two (2) lots for a detached fifty -one (51) dwelling unit residential condominium subdivision and wireless communications facility within the R -1 (Single - Family Residential and MU -2 (Mixed Use 2) Zones, and adding a condition of approval which would add trees within the rear yard areas of those properties adjacent to the Kenmore Avenue single - family residences to reduce the impact of the project. LEGAL. REVIEW This report has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney's Office as to legal form and content. ALTERNATIVES The alternative would be to deny this request and as a result the project as a 51 dwelling unit, detached development with a wireless communications facility would not move forward. FINDINGS OF FACT —ZONE CHANGE 1) The amendment is consistent with the goals, policies and objectives of the General Plan. The zoning code map amendment would be consistent with the goals, policies and objectives of the General Plan in that it would effectively modify the zoning of a vacant lot to include its development as part of a comprehensive specific plan. Specifically, the zone change, which consists of adding the Center Specific Plan Overlay to an adjacent property, would satisfy Goal 3.0 of the Land Use Element which states that the City should provide for revitalization of deteriorating land uses and properties. The proposed zone change would also satisfy Goal 1 of the Housing Element which calls for the City to maintain and enhance the quality of existing residential housing and neighborhoods. 2) The amendment will not adversely affect surrounding properties. The zoning code map amendment would place an abandoned and dilapidated property into a specific plan overlay district in order to redevelop the property as a part of a comprehensive plan for a fifty one (5 1) unit detached condominium development. The redevelopment of this property would enhance adjacent residential and commercial areas. 3) The amendment promotes public health, safety and general welfare. The zoning code map amendment would promote the public health, safety and general welfare of adjacent development and the City as a whole because it would provide for the redevelopment of a property that is abandoned and dilapidated. The zone change would further the goal to improve the area with a detached condominium development that would enhance the areas and properties around the site, while continuing to provide cellular service to the community through the relocation of two (2) existing wireless carrier facilities on the same site. 4) The amendment serves the goals and purposes of the zoning code. CAAmy\AMY\WORD \Reports \Council Reports \SP 14 -01 Z -554 TM- 72195.doc SP 14 -01, Z -554 and TM -72195 January 21, 2015 Page 10 of 15 The zone code map serves the goals and purposes of the zoning code in that it provides for the orderly development of a new detached condominium community on an area that is currently in a state of disrepair. Designating the subject site with the Keenan Center Specific Plan Overlay will include the property in a residential development that enhances the character of the community and eliminates the blighted and unsafe conditions that currently exist. FINDINGS OF FACT — SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 1) The specific plan is consistent with and provides for the orderly, systematic and specific implementation of the General Plan. The specific plan amendment is consistent with the goals, policies and objectives of the General Plan, in that it provides for the orderly development of a specific detached condominium housing development with up to a maximum of 51 detached dwelling units along with the relocation of two existing wireless communications facilities on the site to one mono - eucalyptus tree structure. The specific plan is located within an area that includes residential and commercial properties. The site is currently vacant (with the exception of the wireless communication facilities) and existing structures are in a state of disrepair. Goal 3.0 of the General Plan Land Use Element calls for the revitalization of deteriorating land uses and properties. Additionally, Policy 1.2 of the Housing Element encourages the rehabilitation and removal of substandard housing which would occur with development of the proposed specific plan amendment. 2) The land use and development regulations within the specific plan are comparable in breadth to regulations contained in this chapter. The development regulations outlined within the specific plan amendment are consistent with the purpose and intent of both the Single Family Residential (R -1) and Mixed Use 2 (MU -2) Zones in that they allow for the development of a single family detached condominium project (including private yards, garages, and common amenities) that provides a traditional single - family detached housing community at higher density. The relocation and consolidation of two wireless communications facilities onto one stealth mono - eucalyptus structure maintains wireless service in a contained and aesthetically acceptable manner. All regulations outlined in the specific plan are consistently formatted with other existing zoning code regulations for ease of reference. 3) The specific plan will not adversely affect the public health and safety or result in incompatible land uses; This specific plan amendment allows for the comprehensive development of a fifty -one (5 1) unit single - family, detached gated condominium project and relocates existing wireless communications facilities to a single mono - eucalyptus structure. The specific plan amendment covers a 3.65 acre site that is located on a prominent intersection within the City. Currently the site contains several vacant dilapidated structures that are structurally unsound and an eyesore to the public, resulting in blight within the property and to those areas surrounding the site. Development of a new residential community, as proposed in the specific plan amendment, would enhance adjacent residents and commercial properties. Additionally, the relocation of two existing wireless communications facilities to a single mono - eucalyptus structure will provide the existing area with continued cellular service in an aesthetically appealing and stealth manner. CAAmy\AMY\WORD \Reports \CouldI Reports\SP 14-01 Z -554 TM- 72195.doc SP 14 -01, Z -554 and TM -72145 January 21, 2015 Paae 11 of 15 4) The specific plan provides the framework to phase and pace growth within the specific plan area as to ensure completion of all necessary public facilities concurrently with completion of development entailed in the specific plan. The specific plan is not phased. It is anticipated that the developer, KLL Investment, LLC will construct the 51 unit single- family detached condominium project and mono- eucalyptus wireless facility in one phase. Development of the proposed project will comply with the development standards and design guidelines contained within the specific plan amendment. 5) The specific plan identifies adequate financing mechanisms for the infrastructure and public facilities required to support the development. The Applicant shall be required to provide all infrastructure as required by the City and any outside utility companies to the project site as part of not only the Specific Plan, but also the tentative Tract Map (TM- 72195). There are no financing mechanisms noted in the specific plan and financing of the infrastructure and the overall development will be completely borne by the Developer. Maintenance of all common areas and gated access will be the responsibility of the homeowners association, established through the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC &Rs) for the project. FINDINGS OF FACT — TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 1) Adequate systems designed and constructed to provide all necessary utilities to each lot proposed to be created, including, but not limited to, facilities for water, natural gas, electricity, cable television and telecommunications telephone services. Requests for comments /conditions on the proposed tract map were sent to outside entities as indicated in the staff report on June 5, 2014. No agencies responded. Applicable utility agencies will be required to provide written notice that they will serve the subject development which, in turn, must be provided to the City as part of the plan check permitting process. Accordingly, the proposed project will have all necessary utilities. 2) An adequate domestic water distribution system designed and constructed to service each lot proposed to be created. The subject property is serviced by Valley County Water District. The proposed project will be connected through new water service to the units. The Public Works Department has also indicated that each unit is required to have separate water service. As a result, the proposed units would be serviced by an adequate domestic water distribution system approved by the Fire Department. As conditioned, the proposed units would be serviced by an adequate domestic water distribution system. 3) An adequate sewage system designed and constructed to serve each lot proposed to be created. Wastewater collection for the City is in the service area of the Los Angeles County Sanitation District No. 15. Wastewater is treated at the San Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant (SJCWRP) or at the Joint Water Pollution Control Plant in Carson ( JWPCP). SJCWRP provides primary, secondary and tertiary treatment for 100 million gallons of wastewater per day. JWPCP provides both primary and secondary treatment for approximately 280 million gallons of wastewater per C:Wmy1AMY1WORD1Reports \Counci1 Reports \SP 14 -01 Z -554 TM- 72185.doc SP 14 -01, Z -554 and TM -72195 January 21, 2015 Pape 12 of 15 day and has a total permitted capacity of 400 million gallons per day. Development of the Project would require development/connection fees that would mitigate impacts to wastewater treatment facilities. Because the Project is considered to be a relatively small development, the two wastewater facilities currently has capacity to serve the Project, and the City, SJCWRP and JWPCP would review the Project's development plans to determine a fair share fee contribution to mitigate any impacts. 4) An adequate storm water drainage system designed and constructed to serve each lot proposed to be created. Pursuant to the Public Works Department, the Applicant will not be required to provide off -site improvements relating to storm water drainage dependent upon review and approval of a submitted grading plan for the properties. However, any proposed construction will be subject to the City's Development Impact Fee, Flood Control, Provided that the Applicant meets the conditions of approval and the grading plan is approved, there should be adequate storm water drainage for each lot. 5) An adequate public and/or private street and /or alley system designed and constructed to serve each lot proposed to be created. The City's Public Works Department has determined that there is an adequate public street system to serve the project. However, certain conditions of approval are required that relate to the public right -of -way and include construction of drive approaches which meet ADA requirements, ADA compliant wheel chair ramp, installation of street trees, and replacement /reconstruction of any damaged public right -of -way or street improvements during the construction process in accordance with the City's current standards. The internal roadway will be gated and privately owned and maintained by the homeowners association. 6) An adequate traffic regulatory system, including necessary traffic signals, signs, pavement markings and stripings. The City's Public Works Department has concluded the current conditions provide for an adequate traffic regulatory system, however, specific improvements are required to the public right -of -way including street tree planting, new parkway irrigation and landscaping, ADA compliant wheel chair ramp, new drive approach construction and replacement/reconstruction of any damaged existing improvements as a result of the new construction. These requirements are outlined in through the Public Works Conditions of Approval. As such, the project will adequately mitigate any traffic impacts. 7) The undergrounding of utilities pursuant to Chapter 97, part 2 (Underground Utility Districts) of the Municipal Code. Pursuant to Chapter 97, part 2 of the City's Municipal. Code, the Applicant shall be required to underground the utilities. 8) Any and all other improvements found necessary by the City to provide all services to each lot proposed to be created. C:\Amy\AMY\WORD \Reports \Council Reports \SP 14 -01 Z -554 TM- 72185.doc SP 14 -01, Z -554 and TM -72195 January 21, 2015 Page 13 of 15 Staff is of the opinion that, provided that the Applicant obtains approval by the City Council on the tract map and the related specific plan amendment and zone change request and meets and or exceeds the conditions of approval, the lot(s) would have adequate service and could be subdivided consistent with the City's codes. 9) In addition to the improvements as required by the City's Municipal Code and Departments, there are also design requirements for the proposed tentative tract map that need to be met. Pursuant to Section 152.12 of the City's Municipal Code, the design of the subdivision shall conform to the requirements of this Chapter 152, any and all design requirements set forth in the General Plan, the design and development standards established for the associated zoning district per the Zoning Code, the applicable design guidelines set forth in the Design Guidelines Manual, generally accepted engineering standards, and to such standards required by the City, including, but not limited to, plans for grading and erosion control. The Planning Division has reviewed the proposed subdivision in conjunction with the proposed specific plan amendment and the proposed lots each meet the minimum development standards contained within the Municipal (Zoning) Code, including, minimum lot size, lot depth, and lot width, in addition to those conditions and development standards contained in the specific plan amendment. As a condition of approval, any existing structures located on the property shall be demolished or brought into conformance with the current Zoning Code and/or adopted specific plan amendment standards prior to the tract map being finalized. Additionally the tentative tract map is consistent with Goal 2.0 of the Land Use Element of the General Plan which states "accommodate new development that is compatible with and compliments existing conforming land uses " as the proposed lots meet the existing development standards contained in the Code. Any future development on the subject properties will be subject to the Specific Plan Amendment SP 14 -01, provided it is adopted by the City Council, otherwise, any future development will be subject to the current density for the respective zoning designation, development standards, design guidelines, and processes at the time of submittal. The Public Works Department, as part of their comments, has included a requirement for the Applicant to submit plans relating to grading and erosion control for review and approval. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1) The subject property shall be subdivided and maintained in substantial compliance with Exhibits `A' and `B' dated December 10, 2014; and 2) Any fences and /or walls shall be subject to the development standards contained in the specific plan relating to material, maximum allowable height and yard setback. Proposed wall material shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Division; and 3) Should any existing trees on the property that are designated as a Mature Tree in accordance with the City's Tree Ordinance be removed, a tree removal application shall be submitted to the City's Tree Department (Planning Division) for review and approval prior to any said removal; and C:Wmy\AMY\WORD \Reports \Council Reports \SP 14 -01 Z -554 TM- 72195.doc SP 14 -01, Z -554 and TM -72195 January 21, 2015 Page 14 of 15 4) Any proposed structures shall be developed in compliance with the current development standards and design guidelines contained within the adopted Specific Plan 14 -01; and 5) Applicant shall be subject to any and all Los Angeles County Clerk Posting Fees for the Notice of Determination, including but not limited to the California Department of Fish and Game Fees; and 6) Applicant shall finalize the Lot Line Adjustment currently in process with the City of Baldwin Park, prior to the City Council public hearing on this item in January 2015; and 7) Any and all landscaping (including trees surrounding the wireless communications facility) shall be developed in compliance with the current development standards and design guidelines contained within the adopted Speci 1c Plan 1 + -v 1, and 8) Final landscaping and irrigation plans shall be prepared pursuant to Subchapter 153.160 of the City's Municipal Code. All landscaping and irrigation plans shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Division; and 9) The tract map and proposed development may be subject to the following Development Impact Fees, as required: Public Art Flood Control Traffic Impact Parkland In -Lieu 10) The Applicant shall comply with all comments and conditions of approval as determined by the City's Public Works Department as shown on Attachment #7; and 11) The Applicant shall comply with all comments and conditions of approval as determined by the Los Angeles County Fire Department shown on Attachment 98; and 12) The Applicant shall comply with all comments and conditions of approval as determined by the Los Angeles County Sanitation District shown on Attachment #9; and 13) In accordance with the requirements of the Public Works Department, the Applicant shall provide separate and independent water and sanitary sewer service to each property; and 14) Utilities shall be undergrounded, pursuant to Chapter 97, Part 1 of the City's Municipal Code; and 15) The Applicant shall provide additional screening in the form of landscaping (i.e. trees) within the rear yards of those properties within the project that are adjacent to the Kenmore Avenue Single- Family Residences to reduce the visual impact of the project. This screening shall be maintained by said project property owners, and enforced by the projects Homeowner's Association. Such language regarding the landscaping and on -going maintenance shall be included within the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC &R's); and 16) The Applicant shall install or cause to be installed individual, independent service to each separate property for any and all utility companies that provide service to said properties, including but not CAAmy\AMY\WORD \Reports \Council Reports \SP 14-01 Z -554 TM- 72195.doc SP 14 -01, Z -554 and TM -72195 January 21, 2015 Paee 15 of 15 limited to Valley County Water District, Southern California Edison, The Gas Company, Verizon Telephone, and Time Warner Cable; and 17) The Final Map shall comply with the time frames as contained within the California Subdivision Map Act; and 18) The Applicant shall sign and have notarized an affidavit within ten (10) days of the date of this resolution, stating that the applicant has read and accepts all of the conditions of approval. ATTACHMENTS 41, Exhibit "A ", Specific Plan SP 14 -01, dated November 2014 2, EX111U11 D , i"1cL11J, dated iJCGC1ilUGi lU, GVlc+ 93, Vicinity Map #4, Initial Study and related Environmental Documentation #5, Mitigation Monitoring Program #6, Application Forms and Statements #7, Public Works Department Comments #8, Los Angeles County Fire Department Comments #9, Los Angeles County Sanitation District Comments #10, City Council Resolution 2015 -047 911, Ordinance 1368 # 12, City Council Resolution 2015 -048 CAAmy\AMY\WORD \Reports \Council Reports\SP 14 -01 Z -554 TM- 72195.doc r:�:�����ai l• 1 ! ' 1 to Specific Plan SP 06-01 HIMIM CASE NUMBER: TM-72195 1", jD -jo * W.'I • November 2014 SP 14-01 FDIIEM��� MMI Merced Avenue KLL Investments, LLC TABLE OF CONTENTS ].V Introduction .---------------.---------------------..3 2.0 Environmental Review and ---------------------..4 3.0 Land Uses ................................................................................................................... 5 4.0 Development Standards .............................................................................................. 5 5.0 Design Guidclinns ----------------------------------.]A 6.0 Development Prooedorco------------------------------..11 7.0 Implementation Program ------------------------------..]l 8.0 Amendments -------------------------------------ll SPECIFIC PLAN AMEINTDMENT 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Explanatory Note This Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) amends the Kennan Center Specific Plan dated January 17, 2007, which was prepared and accepted by the City of Baldwin Park that year. The original Specific Plan proposed twelve (12) townhome units, a private educational institution (Mid Valley Learning School), and two (2) wireless communication facilities. It is now proposed that the land be developed with fifty one (51) detached condominiums units and two (2) wireless communication facilities located on a single mono- eucalyptus structure. it is therefore necessary to amend the original Specific Plan to reflect this development and land use change. 1.2 Purpose and Intent This SPA is enacted pursuant to Section 65450 of the California Government Code, for specific plans and specific plan amendments. The purpose of this SPA is to provide for the development of a 51 -unit, detached, single - family residential component and a separated lot for a mono - eucalyptus structure with two existing co- located wireless communication facilities on certain real property to which this SPA applies. This SPA will implement the objectives of the Housing Element of the City of Baldwin Park's General Plan, The SPA as such, will allow the site to be developed in accordance with the City's adopted General Plan, Single- Family Residential Design Guidelines and the City's Municipal Code, The Design Review Committee has evaluated the project based on architectural design, aesthetic quality, compatibility of design with adjacent land uses, conformance with the General Plan and all adopted development standards, design guidelines and development agreements. This SPA is intended to implement Focus Area 8 Baldwin Park/Merced Commercial Node of the City's General Plan, which represents another neighborhood serving commercial node. The overall goal of the Land Use Element in Baldwin Park's General Plan is to facilitate revitalization, stimulate development on vacant in -fill and underutilized properties, and provide additional housing opportunities. The density requirements, development standards, land use restrictions and changes to design guidelines identified in this SPA are intended to replace requirements and take precedence over the original Kennan Center Specific Plan, the City's Zoning Ordinance within the Specific Plan Area, where necessary, although the City's Subdivision Ordinance, Design Review process, Building Codes and other citywide policies and regulations would continue to apply. This SPA addresses issues relating to land use, specific development standards relating to residential development and wireless facilities, design, building type and scale (giving nearby property owners and developers certainty and incentives to improve the existing built environment) and increase overall investment. 3 1.3 Location and Setting The SPA Area is located in the City of Baldwin Park, located on the southwest corner of Baldwin Park Boulevard and Merced Avenue and has approximately 3.65 acres of gross lot area (3.63 acres net). A total of twelve (12) separate properties encompass the overall site area (reference Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map and Exhibit "B" - Boundary Survey). At the time of this SPA, all structures are vacated and demolition planned. Surrounding properties located to the south and west of the subject site developed with single - family residences. East of the site, across Baldwin Park Boulevard, a mix of single - family and multi- family residences and commercial uses are located. Properties to the north of the subject site, across Merced, include existing commercial and multi - family residential. The project area currently has two zoning designations of MU -2, Mixed Use 2 and R -1, Single- Family Residential. All structures on the property (formerly used as a church, party supply store, four single - family residences and a private school) are vacant and are planned for demolition. All necessary shopping, medical, commercial, recreational and transportation facilities are conveniently located within a mile or are easily accessible by frequently operating public transportation provided by the Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA), Foothill Transit and the City shuttle. The nearby 1 -10 San Bernardino Freeway provides additional access to downtown Los Angeles. According to the City's Public Works Department, all utilities are available adjacent to the site on Baldwin Park Blvd. and Merced Avenue, and are adequate to serve the proposed development with minimal off -site improvements. An existing fire station (Station 29) is located within 2 miles north of the site and fire hydrant access throughout the site is provided per code within 150 feet of all portions of the development. The proposed Site Plan conforms to Los Angeles County Fire Department codes and regulations for new developments, for building height, fire access, turnarounds, and drive aisle /fire lane widths and lengths. Baldwin Park City Hall, with all of its administrative and public facilities, is located approximately 1 mile from the proposed development. The post office is also located within 2 miles of the site. The Los Angeles County Public Library is located within 1 mile of the site. Recreational and leisure opportunities are provided by city parks and facilities conveniently located throughout the city. There are five (5) parks located in the City, providing approximately 27 acres of open space. 2.0 Environmental The original Kennan Center Specific Plan was prepared in coordination with an environmental review and Review and assessment process conducted by the City. As a result of that assessment, it has been determined that Coordination the original Specific Plan will not have a significant impact on the environment, and a Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact was prepared. Given that this SPA represents a different project with revised land use and site plan assumptions, this SPA will not utilize the environmental review and assessment from the original Specific Plan. A new Initial Study was prepared for this SPA and the environmental review and assessment of that document was used to determine California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) conformance for this project. As a result of the new assessment, it has been determined that the Specific Plan Amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment, and a 4 Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact was prepared. 3.0 Land Uses The City maintains discretionary authority for many types and aspects of land development projects. Compliance with land use policies for projects within the Specific Plan Area will be required as part of Planning Commission and /or City Council review of development applications. Primary permitted uses allowed pursuant to this SPA shall be: ° Fifty one (51) detached condominium units with private yards and respective common open space and guest parking areas ° A single Mono - Eucalyptus structure housing a total of two (2) Wireless Communication Facilities (see Exhibit "C" - Site Plan) 4.0 Deveivpuicur The provisions of this arr. have been established to provide for the orderly development or the Property. Standards Application of the SPA is intended to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the community. All construction on the Property shall comply with all applicable state laws in effect as amended from time to time, except as expressly provided in this SPA. In order to provide relief and allow deviations from the development standards and Zoning Code requirements, the following control mechanisms shall be applied: 4.1 Development Standards -Residential Component The following development standards shall apply to the residential development within the SPA area. 4.1.01 Maximum Density The Site Plan (Exhibit "C ") attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference identifies the boundaries for the fifty one (51) detached condominium units. Based on the total square footage within the boundary site, the density shall not exceed 14 dwelling units per gross acre. 4.1.02 Yard. Setbacks The following required yard setbacks shall be observed: a. Side Yard: 8' minimum on one side yard of the unit, 0' on the other (similar to a "zero lot line ") b. Rear Yard: 10' minimum average, no less than 8' minimum for any yard. 4.1.03 Minimum Floor Area Each dwelling unit shall have and maintain a minimum gross floor area of 2,000 square feet (includes a 2- car garage) and shall have not less than three (3) bedrooms. 4.1.04 Building Height and Length The height of the detached condominium shall not be constructed to a height exceeding three - stories, with a maximum building height of 35 feet. The detached condominiums shall not exceed 55 feet in length. 4.1.05 Open Spaces Private Open Space - Each dwelling unit shall provide a private open space area having access from within the main dwelling unit, as well as access from the front of the property through a man gate. All private yard areas shall be enclosed by a solid wall, gate, or rail at least 36" in height. Items that may be stored in this area shall be limited to patio furniture, potted plants, outdoor barbeque, outdoor play equipment, which 5 shall be addressed in the CC &R's. See Exhibit "D" - Private Yard Exhibit. Common Open Space - All residents of the detached condominiums shall be provided with a designated common open space area, termed as a "passive park," located towards the entry of the community, near Units 29, 28, and 20. This common open space will be equipped with an outdoor barbeque and a seating area; all of which shall be addressed in the CC &R's. This park shall have a depth of not less than 77' and a width of not less than 39' (2,682 sq. ft.). The open space areas between and in the front of the detached condominiums shall have a width of not less than 10' and a depth of not less than 30'. All landscape areas not considered as private open space (i.e., private yard areas) shall be considered common open space to be maintained by the Homeowners Association. GAL.GFIL IVI LIIC perimeter IGlll.ing and vJal1S arcing JllaleU property and boundary Idles, the l:G1fi111Gn open space areas shall not be enclosed and shall be free of any perimeter fencing. The common open space areas shall be maintained by the community's Homeowners Association (HOA), as shall be addressed in the CC &R's. 4.1.06 Parking Each unit shall be provided with a 2 -car attached garage that is independently and privately accessed. A total of 18 guest parking spaces shall be provided for the sole use of the residents and shall be located within the residential boundary identified on the Site Plan. Proper signage shall be provided identifying these stalls as guest parking for the residential component. Of the18 parking stalls, 16 are located within the gates of the community, while 2 are located before the gated entrance. Unless expressly authorized by the homeowners association on a guest by guest basis, all guest parking stalls may not be utilized between the hours of 2:00 a.m. — 6:00 a.m., This limitation shall be enforced by the homeowners association and expressly stated in the CC &Rs. Any additional limitations on guest parking shall be addressed in the CC &R's. 4.2 Development Standards - Site Plan The following development standards shall apply to the overall site area including both residential and wireless communication facility components of the SPA Area. 4.2.01 Architecture The proposed architectural theme will be modern with straight lines, stucco, flat rooflines, cantilevers, and articulated volumes, walls and windows. Architectural detailing shall include but is not limited to: window and door treatments (such as trim), overhead trellis, appropriate use of color and other architectural features to dematerialize mass. 4.2.02 Pedestrian Orientation The community entrance shall be located so as to encourage pedestrian access from Merced Avenue. The two mechanical entry gates located at the entrance will also have an adjacent man gate and entry sidewalk area to allow for convenient pedestrian access to and from the community. Sidewalks along project frontages on Merced Avenue, Baldwin Park Boulevard, and Kenmore Avenue will be improved, if 6 applicable, as indicated by Conditions of Approval. 4.2.03 Parking/Circulation Parking for the project shall be provided on site and located in designated areas throughout the development (see Site Plan). Primary ingress and egress to the site will be provided from Merced Avenue, through a mechanical gate or man gate, requiring a code entry. A total of 102 garage spaces are allocated for resident parking, while 18 spaces are allocated for guest parking. The parking area shall be designed to meet Fire Department requirements, City parking stall standards, and to avoid potential circulation issues. 4.2.04 Lighting/Security The outdoor lighting system shall be compatible with the architectural theme of the units and shall enhance the building design and adjacent landscape. Lighting standards and building fixtures shall be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent areas. Common open space lighting shall be provided and maintained by the community Homeowners Association (HOA) to provide adequate lighting for security purposes. See Exhibit "E" - Lighting Exhibit. Although the project will introduce new sources of light in the area (exterior building illumination and pedestal lighting throughout the project), these sources of illumination are not anticipated to be significant. Lighting adjacent to guest parking areas and exterior building lighting shall be shielded and directed downward to prevent spillover lighting. Lighting shall be restrained in design and excessive brightness shall be avoided. All proposed lighting shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Community Development Department and the Police Department prior to installation. The security of all residents within this community is the highest priority. To deter uninvited habitants and guests, this community will be developed as a private, gated community with a code entry system. 4.2.05 Signage All signage associated with this Specific Plan shall comply with Subsection 4.2.05. (Signage) of the Zoning Code. 4.2.06 Walls and Fences Prior to the submittal of working drawings for Plan Check, the applicant shall submit samples of exterior colors and materials for walls, fences and other structures to the City, subject to the review and approval by the Planning Division. The project will involve the construction of six (6) foot high block walls around the perimeter of the project site. Any walls that are visible from the public right -of -way shall be decorative (i.e. slumpstone, split face, stucco covered with cap). Planning Staff reserves the right to determine which walls are within view of the public sight -of -way. Plans for the location and design of said walls shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Division prior to submitting working drawings for Plan Check. 4.2.07 Landscaping The landscaping required pursuant to this SPA shall comply with the General Plan, and render use of the property compatible with surrounding and adjacent uses. All landscaping will be compliant with the City's Tree Preservation and Protection regulations outlined in the Baldwin Park Zoning Code. It is intended to preserve, when possible, existing trees which will add to the aesthetic quality of development. Any proposal to remove trees on site shall comply with §153.165.040 (Private Property Tree Removal and Trimming) of the City Zoning Code. A detailed landscaping and irrigation plan shall be submitted to the Planning and Community Development Department for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The "Landscaping Plan" shall conform to the landscaping requirements of the City's Landscaping Design Guidelines and any other applicable requirements as provided in this subchapter. Landscape treatment shall be provided to enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas, enhance the common and private open spaces of the development, enhance the project frontages along Merced Avenue and Baldwin Park Boulevard, and provide aesthetic value to the community. Plant material shall be selected for interest in its structure, texture, color, and ultimate growth. Plants that are hardy, drought - tolerant, compatible with other landscaping and of good appearance shall be used. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, they shall be protected by appropriate curbs, tree guards or other devices. Parking areas, community entrance, community passive park, and circulation areas shall be enhanced with landscaped spaces containing tree or tree groupings. Upon approval of the proposed Landscaping and Irrigation Plan by the Planning and Community Development Department, the landscaped areas shall be installed and permanently maintained in accordance herewith. The precise size and species of all trees shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning and Community Development Department prior to installation. Trees utilized to screen the Wireless Communications Facility outlined in Section 4.2.13 below, shall be of significant size and maturity to materially screen the mono - Eucalyptus structure upon installation. At least three (3) new trees shall be installed along Baldwin Park Boulevard of a size equal to a specimen boxed tree (48" box minimum) with non - invasive roots that will harmoniously blend with the wireless structure. Trees should reach a height of at least 20' within five (5) years. These trees shall be replaced with a similar type tree, subject to original planting specifications, if specified trees do not meet maturity standards listed above or if the existing tree dies. 8 4.2.08 Maintenance The site shall be continuously maintained; continued good appearance depends upon the extent and quality of the maintenance. The choice of materials and their use, together with the types of finished and other protective measures, must be conducive to easy maintenance and upkeep. Materials and finishes shall be selected for their durability and wear, as well as their beauty. Proper measures and devices shall be incorporated for protection against the elements, neglect, damage, and abuse. Provisions for washing and cleaning of buildings and structures, and control of dirt and refuse, shall be included in the design. Configurations that tend to catch and accumulate debris, leaves, trash, dirt and rubbish shall be avoided. Maintenance for the entire project site shall be addressed in detail in the CC &R's. The residential homeowner's association (HOA) shall enforce their own CC &R's. Maintenance for the Wireless Communication Facility and its site shall be maintained by the owner and /or the wireless provider(s). 4.2.09 Utilities All proposed utilities shall be undergrounded pursuant to Chapter 97, Part 1 (Sections 97.060 through 97.063 of the City's Municipal Code. Proposed utilities shall be reviewed and approved by the City's Public Works Department. 4.2.10 Subdivision Map Legal Requirements Pursuant to state law, the City of Baldwin Park is vested in the regulation and control of design and improvements of common interest subdivisions. This development will require application and approval of a Tentative Tract Map for Condominium Purposes for the conversion of eleven (11) lots into one lot. A Lot Line Adjustment will also be submitted for adjusting the lot line between two existing parcels in order to form a separate, legal lot for the wireless communication facilities, for approval at the time of or prior to Tentative Tract Map approval. No subdivision shall be approved unless those on site and off site improvements which are found by the City Engineer to be reasonably necessary to service the units being created are constructed or guaranteed to be constructed by the developer, which include, but are not limited to, the following improvements: a. An adequate domestic water distribution system designed and constructed to service each unit proposed to be created. b. An adequate sanitary sewer system designed and constructed to service each unit proposed to be created. C. An adequate storm water drainage system designed and constructed to service each unit proposed to be created. d. An adequate private street system designed and constructed to service each unit proposed to be created. 9 e. Adequate systems designed and constructed to provide all necessary utilities to each unit proposed to be created including, but not limited to, facilities for water, natural gas, electricity, CATV and telephone services. f. An adequate traffic regulatory system including necessary traffic signals, signs, pavement markings and stripings. g. Any and all other improvements found necessary by the City to provide all services to each unit proposed to be created. 4.2.11 Sale of Detached Condominiums This SPA will require that all fifty one (51) detached condominiums be sold at market rate and not retained by the developer for the purposes of renting or leasing. 4.2.12 Homeowners Association (Residential) - Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC &R's) A Homeowners Association (HOA) with CC &R's shall be required and submitted to the City's Engineering Department concurrently with the Tract Map application for review and approval. Before the first unit is sold, the developer shall record restrictive covenants on all of the properties. These "run with the land," meaning that all successive buyers are bound by the same covenants as the original purchaser. 4.2.13 Wireless Communication Facility Prior to Application for a Building Permit, the owner and /or the wireless provider(s) shall submit a separate Plan /Design Review application to the Planning Division for final elevation and site plan review, The existing facilities will remain on -site, however, a separate, legal lot will be created through a Lot Line Adjustment review and approval. This lot will be independently maintained by the owner of the lot and /or wireless providers. The Planning Division shall review final wireless communication facility plans to verify that the facility complies with the following general design and maintenance requirements: a. Lot Size: 1,575 square foot minimum with lot width of 45 linear feet and lot depth of 35 linear feet. b. Co- Location: Site shall consist of two existing relocated wireless communication facilities with antenna arrays attached to a single mono - eucalyptus structure. C. Size: Mono - eucalyptus structure shall not exceed a height of 69 feet or house more than two wireless communication facilities maximum. Additionally, the structure may contain two arrays of 12 panel antennas for a maximum total of 24 antennas (see Exhibit 7" for detailed plans). Mono - eucalyptus branches shall maintain a minimum radial width which shall substantially screen the arrays and antenna panels. d. Orientation: The entire wireless communication facility shall be located within an existing facility equipment enclosure area on -site along Baldwin Park Boulevard. The walled area shall house the mono - eucalyptus structure, two equipment enclosures (one per carrier) and two emergency generators (one per carrier). The wall height shall be up to 8' for a portion or all of the housed area of this lot, for protection of equipment and less visibility. 10 e. Screening: in addition to the tree installation requirements along Baldwin Park Boulevard outlined in Section 4.2.07 (Landscaping), the property owner /wireless carrier shall install at least four (4) 24 inch box trees along the rear lot line. Vines shall be planted along all sides of the perimeter wall surrounding the wireless communications facility to further enhance landscaping. Use of additional shrubs, vines or other landscape screening material shall be encouraged. The property owner /wireless carriers will be responsible for all maintenance of landscape installed as part of the wireless communication facility. f. Access: An access easement shall be granted to the wireless communication facility lot by the residential portion of this project. This easement will allow access through the residential portion of the project and be included as part of the Tract Map. g. Modifications: Any modification to the requirements outlined above shall be reviewed and approved by the Baldwin Park Planning Commission through the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) process. 5.0 Design Building site and landscape design shall be in accordance with the attached Design Guidelines (see Exhibit Guidelines "G "). Design Guidelines are regarded as an appropriate means of advancing Plan Area Development goals. In particular, design guidelines can direct the Plan Area toward a more favorable development environment by disallowing poor design solutions and encouraging superior design practices. Nonetheless, the applicable criteria are intended to express "intent" rather than absolutes, thereby allowing a certain degree of flexibility as well as promoting creativity and innovation. Deviation from the guidelines shall be considered by the Design Review Committee; however any deviations must exhibit a superior approach to fulfilling the intent, goals, and objectives of the Design Guidelines. 6.0 Development After adoption of the SPA by the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park, no permit or entitlement shall be Procedures issued for the construction or placement of any new building or structure until such development has been considered and approved in accordance with the following procedure: All development proposals shall receive initial review by the Design Review Committee followed by the submission of an application for approval of a Development Plan. Entitlement applications shall be processed and approved in the manner specified in the City's Municipal Code. 7.0 Implementation The implementation of this SPA will be accomplished through the City's development review process, Program considering development plans from concept to construction drawings. Upon adoption of the SPA, developers and /or property owners may prepare and submit plans for development within the SPA Area. Development plans shall be prepared and submitted for review in conformance with the provisions of this SPA and the requirements of the City's Code. Project review shall progress as follows: The City's Plan /Design Review process represents the basis for approval or denial of a more fully developed design proposal, and no building permits will be issued until a proposal has received approval from the City's Plan /Design Review Committee. A more complete description of this process is provided as an attachment to the City's Plan /Design Review application form, and within the City's Zoning Code �l (Section 153.656). Provisions for an appeal of the Design Review Committee decisions to the Planning Commission and City Council have been established. The intent of Plan /Design Review is to promote and enhance good design and site relationships in order to provide for more orderly development within the City. The overriding design principle as established by the City's Zoning Code (Section 153.659.B) is as follows: "integrate the physical architectural element with the streetscape and to visually screen undesirable elements such as parking, storage, loading, refuse collection and similar areas from the view of access streets, freeways and adjacent properties." While this is a general design principle, the attached set of design guidelines are provided as a necessary means of clarifying appropriate design solutions, as well as providing a more substantial basis for the design review of project proposals. 8.0 Amendments The provisions of this SPA, including but not limited to, the documents attached hereto as Exhibits "A -F" inclusive, may be amended in the manner provided in Section 65450 of the Government Code as it now exists or as it may hereafter be amended. • Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map ° Exhibit "B" - Boundary Survey ° Exhibit "C" - Site Plan ° Exhibit "D" - Private Yard Exhibit • Exhibit "E" - Lighting Exhibit ° Exhibit "F" - Wireless Communication Facility Plans Exhibit "G" - Design Guidelines 12 10,619011 L �Q • J Amendment to the Kennan Center Specific Plan Located in the Citjj of • r Z p 0 IU \ OLL Bazw w?�� \ �oQ�n YmmN \ Nils Z 0 N� F" Mm?0 f N } Z D 0 U ow , w lie p� o I s I 1_1 WRIN ;rYaKXAV M$9G08i UZONZIN Y w m z Y srosrs R CL Q a a Z - - -- _ Ir Mss a3 I or I Q Y o9s6 M,9 >,so.x.N o m € € a or U ti 0 U hip E T 2 - ow , w lie p� o I s I 1_1 WRIN II , 96 l3�NVd i I v € l w r E l k - Aso �.' 08 19 i p z < Elio d ,a w€ 19 o 11 102 J p € ' y JIM! J Ew :Jai—; i T F rum wa Pm 1 �a i € you w ao� 4 i 11001 ;rYaKXAV M$9G08i UZONZIN Y w m z Y srosrs R CL Q a a Z - - -- _ Ir Mss a3 I or I Q Y o9s6 M,9 >,so.x.N M.s > > °saA m N m pi m ti 0 M °vim E T II , 96 l3�NVd i I v € l w r E l k - Aso �.' 08 19 i p z < Elio d ,a w€ 19 o 11 102 J p € ' y JIM! J Ew :Jai—; i T F rum wa Pm 1 �a i € you w ao� 4 i 11001 zoH z 7 ° a > u m z� u ;9E o� °a 1.11 > ti ���hi 4Q x �s a - V_ R all r� €' ���ao o,NLL� si k N ART N! _,-H '6t z� 02 b �6 3 1013 w c�c inn p; ME �c m 2 w }� � <m e3�m �mm W ( U a 0 n y 2 F m V ti 1 i A _'_� Y w m z Y w o i r m CL Q a a Z R ¢ z a3 I or Q Y m N m pi m ti 0 M °vim E T � m m zoH z 7 ° a > u m z� u ;9E o� °a 1.11 > ti ���hi 4Q x �s a - V_ R all r� €' ���ao o,NLL� si k N ART N! _,-H '6t z� 02 b �6 3 1013 w c�c inn p; ME �c m 2 w }� � <m e3�m �mm W ( U a 0 n y 2 F m V ti 1 i A _'_� M foll r - =m m nom, mom $t= A � = m i m _ m ° z > o m m N mo ° w a �g ;gym F r $ - -- - - - > =a ---- - - --- y 0 o a o 0 0 0 l o l � D � CD ro Jf 0 w c nz v 0 0 pi hA� Pomam° D m� o> y w a o boo � -n =o'§ m 09 z Z m mtea W pry o� fiyi Z Z m y ma r ® m y j 3 _o m 0 Z A Zdr x> 54 y m c ° �B 9 m ILI m S E I m n F w ° M mm m 1. 0 Z --- ? - -- ? $ - -- - - - > =a ---- - - --- y 0 o a o 0 0 0 l o l a=a CD ro w c nz e4« 90 0 pi hA� Pomam° F -W m� o> y w a o boo � -n =o'§ m 09 s m ro 0 W z W pry o� fiyi Z � �Pn �N o N m 3 ®HM r ® acv oQ _o m o A Zdr x> 54 y m c Z $ - -- - - - > =a ---- - - --- y 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 l o l a=a CD ro w c nz e4« 90 0 pi hA� Pomam° F -W m� o> y w a o boo � -n =o'§ m 09 s m ro 0 W z W pry o� fiyi Z � �Pn �N o N m 3 ®HM r ® acv oQ _o m o A o x> 54 y m c Z �B 9 Q 9 < E m ° M mm m 1. ° O A 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 l o l a=a c nz e4« 90 g' �pz hA� P Roz F -W �£ o> Y N N €mm g F p'° > � °ago N RH °R uF X is � 54 ii„a9 °� N�7E 9 E 1. A n° �� ear e eon g plpc �9 »m�3m m� �£N a$ �m 4p 0n 7 a o y 0 D as V V 0 0 Z OZ.. 0m 4 Z " J 6)-00) N M -n Z w >z D mzra0 2m °0 o> m OM c 'U Fy r�r N �,o o m m Z D MY 4p 0n 7 a o y 0 D as V V 0 0 Z OZ.. 0m 4 Z " J 6)-00) N M -n Z w >z D mzra0 2m °0 o> m OM c 'U Fy r�r N �,o o m m Z D c a Y N N Po g F a�6si ii„a9 °� N�7E E 1. Gi 4p 0n 7 a o y 0 D as V V 0 0 Z OZ.. 0m 4 Z " J 6)-00) N M -n Z w >z D mzra0 2m °0 o> m OM c 'U Fy r�r N �,o o m m Z D q MM MMMM-( «0C. ,in o 0 2 o cu y}\ \ /.. - 0 0 0 \f \§ � \ \\ o \\ 0 u; > 2- 0 / \\ \ \ \ \ \/ 0 . > 11 Cc . T- '63 p > Z (2 L4 e ?, 0 m Z 9 FF-I F- F- FT-� p lvl �� \\ co C- V� r- 71- 0 0 rD ��\ :K FT-1 F- F- FT-1 §/ gm 0 (D 3 (D n c CL r- (D :K FF-I U-1 F- F- FT-1 Tm F— F— T-1 --4 rn J C) z K) R y. . cn 0 c C) < 0 CD 1 c Er :K F- F- FT-1 T it F7 X:) FFI r'D N YY FAMIr= MIA T� Q 0 77 F—F--j G, I is —L- -7 f IF @ D L-T-717, 77-71 7 in 0 0 -K UI 0 0 C- 0 CD c (D :K FF-I U-1 F- F- FF-I 9 > > IN 7-T 0 Tj :I--, - :2 \ \ / }� ir rl r-- -n « C) 0 c 0 rD ib n c :K FT-1 F- F- FT-1 as Rix < F— F- I �j 71 (-Jl fT-1 cc 0 X') 0 \/\ 3 r F- F- r-T-= I I I T-P 3 m cu -77 // 0 CT-1 L>l T- M M"T 04 * co w ;11 s2 0 r- C— r- < \a0 . 3 03 (D C) c :3 Er FF� U-1 F- F- FF-I va VT 0 a r-,- F- CA C) I- - FI-I F7 I �o Fri \/ F-I 0 0 :K CTJ f 'a O 0 C- < 0 ID 3 W fD C CL r- M r- n :K FF-I G� C) 0 F- 0 TJ rr F- F- IIA& Z� [fill iplim lj 9 9 i w g Ig _2 (. la g rn rn 11 z z M yn 9 ni Pi [fill iplim lj 9 9 i w g Ig _2 (. la g rn rn 11 z z M yn 9 CD Ewa 3 CD t 1--Aw gl � !7 j � \ § � #| | � {� || § I § \| 1 § k & k m \ / cu m @ � £ \ m § D / / � ° O � CL / ® f 5 \ § / $ 0 k O § \ / / � \ / t / / m @ m t / / / / : / f § O b f }\ 0 a � No , AN 1 m�P 4 k\ U \ f & / \ .c � m @ � £ \ m § � c � ° O � � / ® f 5 \ § / $ k O }\ 0 a � No , AN 1 m�P 4 k\ U \ f & / \ .c � . i is o CO alp r� z T- 0 LU y0 U) 0 z L U) 0— Iz z z —0 cz FZ z 0 U) L-u u I �5 0 0 > LL, r c7 j w w z 9 5 0 cc :E Lij LL, z z LLJ zo > J L 0 (D m LL, < U) 2 Lij cc T 2 Lj F- 0 > Lu < Li 0 m 0 = LU < O o o 0 P D y z M < < < < Li cc 7 < Ev 0 C co rr l) )1� < :1 z a_ W z z T- 0 z W cr CL LO 0 w ui E U) _j v. t I I ® it o .3 N D � � 41 Al N� j r N Aft p wo J - r a 3 C m — F- � Z pgap c� x rx� J L_._r I II W ICI III I II it 4=J z P w =LLB _ W a� N J m O II O J Z < Q Q CL Z z z ® w m ® "'m a o a U) z ® >> ® U z w F _ W w W a ¢ p max_ a a °sz z Ge a F _-oa J J W q6a U - w z z Z w Q p Q po a H J Q w w CL W a p L F- w z a M O _ h w ¢ wj W r z o? �' w w 0 �� Q o W � Z - � s'N, Q aa�� � «'$. w p c Z z° i \ \� ƒ/ 2 \� �� >Z y /. >� []/ / \ \ \ \ \\ \ 2,,, \ =y \ \ \:? \ \ \ \\ ZZZ / \\\ \ : : :,_ \, d \� \} I� (§ ( � z « � � s e Z� v/ S� [ Tz ° \\� ®»\\\ / / , \\ `\ /g\ I( ( ƒ : i! = ® >�> >,>>>t>>>>« ' 1 14 y % ;2:52r : »,;,!% § ifl }\` \g§ ~: ,::/ ` \ \ \- . v .w � m III �o x< Rap .� .I N r W N � V 1. � 0 c ° I x i NS N v 0 " � u / ry� . . . .... ...... ... .. 0 I I- I 3 Ll a J a I I w �J Z -- a -sb — W N C7 �r n o0 oT C w N w Cn � U ` o o - a O p > o M ¢ v z o� a c o O n �p > co 20 5 a o Jo o x cV a ° ¢ o per � ANN w z €€ ap N Ln o c N g� ~ C a W Q > p I 553J�v 0 " � u / ry� EXHIBIT G DESIGN GUIDELINES 1 � 1. Vehicular entry on Merced Avenue should be and contain design features including landscaping, textured paving, water feature and signage. 2. Perimeter walls shall be constructed of stucco coated concrete block with decorative cap, and be consistent with and complement the architectural style and colors of the buildings. Chain -link fence is prohibited 3. Design of the walls surrounding the wireless communications facility shall be similar to the project perimeter walls and compatible to residential architecture (with trellis and screen), and similarly landscaped to blend into the overall project. 4. Each dwelling unit shall have yards on at least two sides for private open space, and for providing natural light into the units. 5. Building massing should be varied with projections and recesses to provide visual and spatial interest. 6. To minimize building height and to lighten building mass, flat roofs with minimal parapets shall be used. 7. Windows and exterior doors should have treatments, such as trim, to emphasize openings, and to dematerialize building mass. 8. Building materials and colors should be used for aesthetic quality, and architectural harmony. 9. Color selection should complement and be consistent with architecture. 10. Plan types, elevation types and color schemes shall be used to provide maximum variety of homes. 11. Individual unit entries should be designed with entry sequence and human scale in mind and be screened for privacy. 12. When possible, natural light should be provided on all 4 sides of homes. Windows on "zero walls" shall have sills at 6 feet (minimum) for privacy of adjacent neighbor while providing natural light. 13. When possible, upper stories should have balconies for usable outdoor space. 14. All exterior light fixtures should be compatible with the architecture of buildings. 15. Landscaping shall be an integral part of the site design. When possible mature trees should be preserved and if removed, replaced like for like. Landscape plans should be prepared by a Landscape Architect. 16. A variety of landscaping materials, textures, colors and forms shall be used, including trees, shrubs, ground cover, flowering plants, boulders, rocks, walls, textured surfaces, trellises, water and other elements. Drought resistant plants are recommended. � -i , ` , � 1 � � oN Q < Z Ir o > LL n o w < D 0 EL < Z it Ul M LL > < (LO < IL Z LLJ Z § �- < j 0 2 -<j Z M,6 w m z �e LL W 0) 0 A Lo 't o cQ o 0 OD (4) Z V) < yW U 0) Z w o 0 co _j 0 cq o OD M z LL .-0 > Lo T N 0 0 co z LL 0 0 na Hug� o Ir gq �L 28 em s 5"N Fq. RH W 6 06 BE C < < 4 CL U) a) E IM CD IL L? > N IL 12 a) X E Uj a) a) na Hug� o Ir gq �L 28 em s 5"N Fq. RH W 6 06 BE C < < 4 CL U) a) E IM CD L? > N a) X E Uj a) a) z U-) < m u CN P ci Vi n wg CL 6, IK Ig R El, R IE El na Hug� o Ir gq �L 28 em s 5"N Fq. RH W 6 M O fq Zm MY 0 < � IL IL IL Gal Pi M OD m 8 (W P d 9 coo v g Dj LL 16 t N to w 0 w z BKC > r II II II I 06 C < < 4 CL U) a) E IM CD L? > N a) M O fq Zm MY 0 < � IL IL IL Gal Pi M OD m 8 (W P d 9 coo v g Dj LL 16 t N to w 0 w z BKC > r II II II I 06 C 4 CL U) a) E IM CD L? > N a) X E Uj a) a) z U-) < m u CN P ci Vi CL IK 9 cl. \ \ I 0 Lo Li 12 0 C3 Co LLI m C2 L c s - — c 6 �i I L � C6 < Eb c -j U < \� \�r U coi3 t 70 --------------- cn 0 C- \ \} (D CL (D :K FF� jl> F- FT-1 Tj Fri rTIl F- 0 z_ F- F - TI i N) [a Ln 0 0 C2 a 3 CD n c 0- M w F- F- Fr—1 o -:E j 4 1 �' E- 0 Fri TI I \ be cy 0 c :r C) < ii 0 rD ----- 71 r-T - - - G� F- FF-I ol EM _U T-1 0 o 0 HF,3 1, F7, - 1j"' o7l li lei CA (j, C/) F1 0 0 -K C) r-r-i 7 ..rl girt CL r- (D FF� r-r --- I I I I to I IF 71 rn ,0 c-n r i Cn �- m V3 (In r� a 0 r- 0 (D 0 3 (D n c CL r- M r, n IRA F- F- FT-1 F- F— I-- ftk ec 2 CD V� 74Z a 0 -C :r CD r- n F- F- FF-I ea gm F- IT, E 6 z --1 F- > i \/I 0 0 CTJ T- 0 EL C =r :3 0 < 0 3 n c FT F- F- FF-I vJ 0 \ \\ \� � \� \� / \ \ \\ /� � \� \� � � : < /\` ;�j F:il if ji s Fit CD CS c 9 9 fit 9 9 O full a Qj I gli ,I �F p; Ag g Ig sc > z am o i �c P 3 ell C) N) N) C) -A6 W. E-- I m • m @@0@88e 880 rm- 0 > > cf) > 0 -0 > (7-0 ci 0 0 0 C 00 0 Q) 0 M 0 (D < 0 (D 0 (D (D 3 z (D :3 D C: M o. cr 0 -n ® :3 (D CD G) 0 o " — (D CD CD UD) (D (n @ 0= CD (D (D CD a (D CD co a) CL (0 -n ® :3 (D C/) (D CD CD (D CD (D CD Tj "Oh 140 f !| � |} R ' 7 |� (D a E3 CD K m G) Ut m z r --i z vi z 0 cf) 0 m z OD AK --i m m > > m m : a: m 1) ,,, m Aq 8 �: 8 c m m C? m (.) m -4 m co Cm 0 --1 > m Im, 0, >, :E , 5 F < z z 2: -- M, 'm' z- T �R Pm 21 0 m om 0 C M 70j D 0 z m cl) m O ml o z 0 0 C: 0 m m 0 0 m 0 m c Cl) z 0 m 0 m z m m om IRS, 14 0 T m 0 i C: G) r ---i z G) m r- m 0 z cr, 0 ,;0 l� I MR T- o V 0— U) NJ Vl -fF : W - -- N 4-� v Cj � > .�— N cU UJ LLJ J:.; U w J p r- N a F uj uj IISI v1 �i` 6� Lu �5 W I� CV Gfl j J O ry m 5 .x �U o a � J Z ry Z ® o z Q Z LU m D •� ��J to c') m Q I J I ry �) o v W � z C l is V N �m o Qm l� I MR T- o V 0— U) NJ Vl -fF : W - -- N 4-� v Cj � > .�— N cU UJ LLJ J:.; U w J p r- N a F uj uj IISI v1 �i` 6� Lu �5 W I� CV Gfl j J O ry m 5 .x �U o a � J Z ry Z ® o z Q Z LU m D •� ��J to c') m Q I J I ry �) Y z N � p Q _ is V N o \ J N O p U J z; Z l� I MR T- o V 0— U) NJ Vl -fF : W - -- N 4-� v Cj � > .�— N cU UJ LLJ J:.; U w J p r- N a F uj uj IISI v1 �i` 6� Lu �5 W I� CV Gfl j J O ry m 5 .x �U o a � J Z ry Z ® o z Q Z LU m D •� ��J to c') m Q I J I ry �) Z Y z z� � Q _ <NO J J W U - z; z � o Z - J Q w rr w � Q Z s W O ¢ 0�� p wow € o 4 � � � W -� w � w Q r U Z � ~ > w �o= U s, � w o p U Z z F ZI Q _ <NO J J W U - z; z � o Z - J Q w rr w � cEx W O ¢ 0�� p wow € o � � W -� w � w WI F ZI <NO J J W U - z; z � o Z - J Q w W ¢ w � cEx a r ¢ 0�� �RE z � � W -� w � w I\ a + IC � I tt w \ o a o o o I L0!33S \_ Al, ` Y0133S i10!]3S aN N oIo cl m i m oib nk 1101:135 i10_33S 2101335 F �1- - - I I\ a + IC � I o o a o o o I L0!33S Y0133S i10!]3S I\ a + IC � I o o a o o o i aN N oIo cl m i m oib nk 1101:135 i10_33S 2101335 Q N ® 4-1 N _ t0 it O o M L LL Q � m � 3 a� 0 �r w 5Q w � P — —_i - _- I nl I i Z a w J F 0 w z w : N % N C-) cn W Q CJ o Z 0 z M n < N Z w z ~ < m cn 0 \ j W C O C N ?�' Z F Ir ` > v p a i m e I g_a u w o a I .'J 1� d N 'o m .'J N J H a i o w M � m 3 � Ci �C =�� �C� �'�� R1 R1 i� RG 100 rn MU: R1 SITE M R1 Y VicinityMap 0 LOCATION: APN's: 8552-017-004, 8552-017- 068 through 078 (12 parcels total) CASE NUMBERS: Z-554, SP 14-01, and TM-72195 DATE: December 10, 2014 HUB OF,; SAN,dX KIEL Nk""A L L E Y i' ,' ' �, • .� ,. �� � I LOU City of Baldwin Park-, Los Angeles County, California LEAD AGENCY: City of Baldwin Park Planning Department 14403 E. Pacific Ave. Baldwin Park, CA 91706 Contact: Amy Harbin, AICP (626) 813-5261 APPLICANT: KLL Investments, LLC 2863 Maricopa St. Torrance, CA 90503 Contact: Mr. Allan Lui (424) 271-7263 CEQA CONSULTANT: RBF Consulting, a company of Michael Baker International 40810 County Center Drive, Suite 100 Temecula, CA 92591-6049 Contact: Kevin Thomas, CEP (951) 506-2074 October 2014 TTM No. 72195 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK TTIVI No. 72195 Table of Contents Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration I ]FA 0.1 1*911MIMMW SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION .........................................................~.....~~~...~...~...1 1.1 STATUTORY AUTHORITY AND RE{}U|REKXENTS--------------------- l 1.2 PURPOSE--------------------------------------.-- l 1.3 CONSULTAT|ON-------------------------------------. 1 1,4 INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE ----------------------------. 2 SECTION 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................... 3 2.1 PROJECT LOCATION & SETTING ----------------------------- 3 22 BACKGROUND .................................... - ......... --------------------.J 23 PROJECT OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................ 4 3.4 PRD]ECTCHARACTERISTICS -------------------------------4 2.5 AGREEMENTS, PERMITS, AND APPROVALS ----------------------- b SECTION 3.0 INITIAL STUDY CHECK LIST .................................................~........~~17 3.1 BACKGROUND -------------------------------------. 17 3.2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED ................................................... lO 3.3 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL }MPACTS---------------------. 18 SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS ......................................................... 21 4.1 AESTHETICS ........................ ....... ............. ............ ------------------------- 21 4.2 AGRICULTURE RES[)URCES------------------------------- 27 4.3 AIR QUA1RY--------------------------------------. 29 4,4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCE3-------------------------------- 41 4.5 CULTURAL RES{}UKCES--------------------------------- 44 4.5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS ........................................... .......................................................... 48 4.7 GREENHOUSE GAS EK4|SS|ONS----------------------------- 53 4.8 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS .................... .................................................. 58 4`9 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUAL[TY--------------------------. 62 4,10 LAND USE AND RELEVANT PLANNING ------------------------- 71 4,11 MINERAL RESOURCES---------------------------------.. 72 4.12 NOISE .............................................................................................................................. 74 4.13 POPULATION AND HOUSING -----------------------------.. OO 4.14 PUBLIC SERVICES ............................................................................................................ 82 4.15 RECREAT|ON--------------------------------------. 84 4.16 TRAN3P{lRTAT|ON/TRAFRC------------------------------. 87 4.17 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEK43---------------------------.. 91 4.18 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF S|GN|H[ANCE----------------------.. 95 4.19 DETERM|NAT|DN------------------------------------ 97 City of Baldwin Park Page i October 2014 Table of Contents TTM No. 72195 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration SECTION5.0 REFERENCES ..................................................... .............................99 5.1 LEAD AGENCY: ........................................ ....................................................................... 99 5.2 PREPARERS OF INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ........................ 99 5.3 REFERENCES: .................................................................................................................. 99 f�73��9 Exhibit 1 Regional Location Map .............................................................. ............................... 7 Exhibit2 Project Vicinity Map ................................................................... ............................... 9 Exhibit 3 Existing Parcels Map .................................................................. .............................11 Exhibit 4 Illustrative Site Plan .................................................................... .............................13 Exhibit 5 Tentative Tract Map I 1 Mv1 72195 .............................................. ............................... 15 Exhibit 6 Conceptual Cellular Tower Elevation View ................................. .............................25 Exhibit 7 FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map ............................................... .............................69 Table 4.3 -1: Construction Emissions ............................................................ .............................32 Table 4.3 -2: Long -Term Operational Air Emissions ...................................... .............................35 Table 4.3 -3: Localized Significance of Construction Emissions .................... .............................39 Table 4.3 -4: Localized Significance of Operational Emissions ...................... .............................39 Table 4.7 -1: Estimated Greenhouse Gas Emissions .................................... .............................57 Table 4.12 -1: Maximum Noise Levels Generated by Construction Equipment ..........................76 Table 4.12 -2: Typical Vibration Levels for Construction Equipment .............. .............................79 Table 4.16 -1: Existing LOS Conditions ......................................................... .............................88 T able 4.16 -2: LOS Forecast Year 20300 with Project C onditions ................... .............................89 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A: Air Quality /Greenhouse Gas Data Appendix B: Phase I Site Analysis Appendix C: Transportation Impact Analysis October 2014 Page ii City of Baldwin Park Section 1. TITMOTIMU Me Following preliminary review of the proposed. Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 72195 Project, here after called the "Project," the City of Baldwin Park (City) has determined that the Project is a "project" subject to the guidelines and regulations of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This Initial Study has been prepared to address potential impacts associated with the Project, as described below. This Initial Study addresses the direct, indirect, and cumulative environmental effects associated with implementation of the proposed Project. 11"1111111 11 i III . , In accordance with CEQA (Public Resources Code, Section 21000 - 21.178.1), this Initial Study has been prepared to analyze the Project in. order to identify any potential significant environmental impacts that would result from implementation of the Project. The purpose of this Initial Study is to inform City of Baldwin Park decision- makers, affected agencies, and the public of potential environmental impacts associated with implementation of the proposed Project. ..1 ,. The purpose of an Initial Study is to: (1) identify environmental impacts; (2) provide the Lead Agency with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an EIR or Negative Declaration; (3) enable an applicant or Lead Agency to modify the project, mitigating adverse impacts before an EIR is prepared; (4) facilitate environmental assessment early in the design of the project; (5) provide documentation of the factual basis for the finding in a Negative or other method, provided that entries on a checklist or other form are briefly explained to indicate that there is some evidence to support the entries; (4) a discussion of ways to mitigate significant effects identified, if any; (5) an examination of whether the Project is compatible with existing zoning, plans, and other applicable land use controls; and (6) the name of the person or persons who prepared or participated in the preparation of the Initial Study. 1.3 CONSULTATION The Lead Agency has determined that an Initial Study would be required for the Project, the Lead Agency begins informal consultations with all Responsible Agencies and Trustee Agencies that administer resources affected by the Project. Consultations are conducted to obtain recommendations from those Responsible Agencies prior to initiation of the permit acquisition process. The City would consider any recommendations from these agencies in the formulation of their preliminary findings. City of Baldwin Park Page 1 October 2014 Section I.OIntroduction 17M No. 71925 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Pertinent documents relating to this Initial Study have been cited and incorporated, in accordance with Sections 15148 and 15l50of the State CD[)/\ Guidelines, to eliminate the need for inclusion of voluminous engineering and technical zeporta within the CB(}A document. Of particular relevance are those previous EIR's that present information regarding descriptions of environmental settings, future development-related growth aod cumulative impacts. This Initial Study has incorporated by reference the following documents, which are available for review aL the following location: CITY QFBALDWIN PARK PLANNING DEPARTMENT 144O38. Pacific Ave. Baldwin Park, CA 91706 October 2014 Page 2 City of Baldwin Park The proposed project site ia located within the City cdBaldwin Park, Loa Angeles County, CA; refer to More specifically, the project site is located onthe southwest corner of Baldwin Park Boulevard and Merced Avenue. Refer to Exhibit 2, ProJect ra more detailed vie vvufG6upr-ectlocudmu. The project aitecoueisL*of12 parcels and is approximately 36 acres o1 developed land (refer to Exhibit 3. Existing Parcels, Aa such, the project nitehueexpurienoedanbstuoba} development and dOahozbmoce. The site contains existing structures, with past uses that include u church facility, school facility, uvvbelcea communication facility, a commercial building as well as five single- family residences. However, all parcels and the structures contained vvbhhn them have been acquired by the project app|icantandul]strnctunesontheeihe are vacant. The existing wireless communication facility continues to operate on the site. Existing abngie-iuoz|y residential is located adjacent to the west and southwest boundaries of the project site. A nix of existing residential (single-family and ozo\b,fmmilv) and commercial naea are located to the east ucz000 Baldwin Park Boulevard. /\ mix of existing commercial and znnld-Faozi1y residential uses is located ho the north across Merced Avenue. Pursuant to the Baldwin Park Zoning Map the site contains two underlying zoning designations, Single Family Residential (R-]) and Mixed Use (MU- ).AnIndial Study/Negative Declaration dated April 20ll indicates the C-) zoning on the project obeoodayortionofthoR-] zoning was proposed to be changed to MU2 as part of a City comprehensive update of zoning pursuant to permit applications AZC-163, AGP-115, and Z-553, which has since been approved. The project is also located within the City of Baldwin Park Kerman Center Specific Plan area approved by the City on January 17, 2007. Under the Specific Plan, the project site land use designation includes residential Lovvnbozoes, wireless communication facilities, private educational facilities, and potentially certain allowable coonozuzcia1 uses. The Baldwin Park General Plan includes Single Family Residential (SF8) and Neighborhood Commercial (NC) land use designation on the project aite.3heCity/\prU2O11InidalShudy/Nugotivo[)eciorubon provided and mentioned above indicates the NC and portions of the BF8 designations on the project site were to be changed to a Mixed Use (MU) land use designation in the General Plan. City of Baldwin Park Page 3 October 2014 Section 2.0 Project Description TTIVI No. 72915 Initial Study/mitigated Negative Declaration • I}a000Umb existing abucboca. • Process u Lot Line between two existing parcels on the project site to create a separate parcel for the existing wireless communication equipment. • Process a Change of Zone to include APN 8552-017-004 into the existing Specific Plan Area. • Re-subdivide remaining 11 existing parcels and the I added parcel into aaingle parcel for reaidenbu] condominium purposes. • Develop u gated residential condominium project of5I detached abog1e-luoi` dwelling units, including with a eonal| private passive park facility, landscaping, private drives, and associated parking. • Provide u ou|oouhcd wireless communication facility and related equipment including two (2) antenna arrays on u single monopole intended toresemble u Eucalyptus tree. The project proposes the development of approximately 3.6 acres within the Kerman Center Specific Plan area to accommodate fifty one (51) single family detached town home dwelling units as condominium ownership that would create a gated residential project. /\ Zone Change will be required to add /\PN 8552-017'004 to the existing Specific Plan area. The town home units would be a maximum of thirty five feet (35 ft.) in height and would include up to three stories n[ living space. The town home units would range from 1,620 eq. ft. to 1,945 sq. h. in size. The project would also include interior private drives, a aonuU prh/oha passive park facility, landscaping, and utility infrastructure toserve the project /re6erto Exhibit 4, Illustrative Site Plan and Exhibit 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 72195. The existing wireless communication facility that is located on the vacant church building atueo|m would be relocated within a 1,300 sq. fL enclosure along Baldwin Park Boulevard. The wireless communication facility would contain un approximate sixty nine foot (69ft.)monopole, which is proposed to be enhanced with acayeningl to resemble a Eucalyptus tree (mono- eucalyptus) with actual living trees adjacent to it. The wireless communication facility would also contain landscaping and accessory equipment required for operation ofthe facility /refer to Exhibit 6, ConcePtual Cellular Tower Elevation). There are existing power lines and associated poles that are aligned within the of Merced Avenue and Baldwin Park Boulevard. It is anticipated that one pole, located on Merced Avenue, would obstruct access into the project and would be required tohe relocated. The project is anticipated to be u phased development, with u development sequence that is subject to change over time Lo respond to various factors including the cyclical nature ufthe housing 1 Screening is intended to conceal/hide or disguise the mono-pole (mono-eucalyptus) to make it more stealth in appearance. October 2014 Page 4 City of Baldwin Park TTIVI No. 72915 Section 2.0 Project Description Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration market and other variations in demand. Individual project phases may overlap or be developed concurrently. City of Baldwin Park Page 5 October 2014 IS/MND Approval City of Baldwin Park Specific Plan Amendment (SP 14-01) City of Baldwin Park Zone Change (Z-544) City of Baldwin Park Lot Line Adjustment City of Baldwin Park —1 entative —1 ract Map No. 72195 City of Bald-W-1-1-1 Pdal-k Plan / Design Review City of Baldwin Park Development Plan City of Baldwin Park Gradinn Pp.rrnit City of Baldwin Park Building Permits City of Baldwin Park Air Quality Permit South Coast Air Quality Management District Storriwater Pollution Prevention Plan State Water Resources Control Board City of Baldwin Park Page 5 October 2014 Section 2.0 Project Description IMUTAIIIII011156W*40161 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK October 2014 Page 6 City of Baldwin Park i Edward,-, Lilw „9 #,S Air F rrr {.3nd ;T otlartz Lancaster ra a Hrt! L ak L+ .er1. > Pairridale A de lant6 4 Lrttlei-rjck r r$rHfl g ? "3'$ lrR s° ,,ee (## HX`..A fbrj Apple § anta - alta #rlM7rcr r larita mtl t k VA enJa 1���ena AI9( t�t.P file,,,hall z r lt�r r lht,rpa4, Vail" T h{ u artd Still- ter,= � , a mf . �A e aline r "attfarrlla aks Florth Hdl 9 \Burbank )ard „« rl ' North H0II;� r I R , " village"', ±_ i rid a" Fanhan , � a�adena T 44 0 -4d T,,qXlgZ t #C, iris >nga "Bernal .dm-, E"3 t K � �, L el EI Farr nt r, E = r�nt't�°l�»� na Irr li vA +_� d C r rtn rr ! Riv ersrde ivlc rent, L" r r Bar fid rEwx. , tllN, Ncf aW H me r atba �af I Ems C Linda Of Off g . 7 r,f r any + 4 7 ar lera Orange � F ° erri L� n +7 Urra t � e a3 i l" � ., 6 �t9rh 13, J'AY,�, t a sun {. b Ir ,rt° tirr-tMq rfl � CI Toro B ae 1 t" to Vie .<a l �, s lair Taff* ul ix Dana " haft F rrs Ifeten llafwfe , S ari Lur r Rey San O'OpenStreetMap (and) contributors, CC- BY -SA, Sources: Esre, Del.=orriie Project Site HERE, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS.4:Afl NPS -, q NRCAN, GeoBase, tGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esd Japan, MET(,' Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, and the GI'114sreFCortiitiuhity Section 2.0 Project Description TfM No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK October 2014 Page 8 City of Baldwin Park Not to Scale TTM 72195 Initial Study Project Vicinity Map CONSULTING A - , - r,0 ;'P.,v Exhibit 2 Los Angetcs St C ST W .i ; cl: q . park"- <k vm , Y' . . S "v rz d� .✓ m i k p,.,� °�' €''• v£k irk,. rj{ c „✓ �. '�„S,' k;j � � v� •'' ,' 4�"�': X4#4 n 16� wq; ¥�e"f Project Site a, Sources: Esn, DeLL rme, HERE, USGS, Intermap, increme?i# P Corp., NRCA4' s Not to Scale TTM 72195 Initial Study Project Vicinity Map CONSULTING A - , - r,0 ;'P.,v Exhibit 2 Section 2.0 Project Description FINJUIRS946-TV Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK October 2014 Page 10 City of Baldwin Park x � :: � yam. /� �> -<® ( a <\2 ) °� » ± : *ƒ« ` �/ \ Section 2.0 Project Description TTM No. 72915 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK October 2014 Page 12 City of Baldwin Park 10 ,;I- x LU eK Z JIM a p. E L z C, Section 2.0 Project Description TTM No. 72915 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK October 2014 Page 14 City of Baldwin Park rz" I JPI se O _0 U) CL LO C14 rl- 3 all N, X LLJ < i ID, Z z lam W 0 > 6 W m < 0 w < CL 0 LL > < I Z w � P < , �,4 0-, 0 C, .3 z < m W, 11 LL O.J W 0) to 't wo Nom }q z o ,,o m m z o uj 0 co Co LL z — o it)- CO4 > 0 c) UL I JPI se O _0 U) CL LO C14 rl- 3 all N, X LLJ m co romp �oi I V --- - ----------------- 9 A t --- - ------- 61 pt Jig 5R I WT A& awly'"eff �ii I JPI se O _0 U) CL LO C14 rl- 3 all N, X LLJ Section 2.0 Project Description TTM No. 72915 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK October 2014 Page 16 City of Baldwin Park 1111111 11:1�;J:p�ii 11RIT111''Te. A Iii, Project Title: TTM No. 72915 — (SP 14-01) Lead Agency Narne art u' Pkdu'ress*. City of Baldwin Park Planning Department 14403 E. Pacific Ave. Baldwin Park, CA 91706 Contact Person and Phone Number: Amy Harbin, AICP (626)813 -5261. Project Location: Refer to Section 2.1, Project Location & Setting, above. General Plan Designation: Mixed Use and Single-Family Residential Zoning Classification: Mixed Use (MU-2) and Single-Family Residential (R-1) Description of the Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to, later phases of the proJect, and any secondary, support or off-site features necessary for its implementation.) Refer to Section 2.4, Project Characteristics, above. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Refer to Section 2.1, Project Location & Setting, above. City of Baldwin Park Page 17 October 2014 Section 3.0 Initial Study Check List TTIVI No. 72915 Initial Study/mitigated Negative Declaration The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this Project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact", as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. The analysis found that with implementation of mitigation measures, all of these potentially significant impacts would be reduced to a less than significant level. El Aesthetics EJ Agriculture Resources Q Air Quality 241 Biological Resources 11 Cultural Resources Geology /Soils '-' f--- n T-1-4--l—, /IAT-4.-- 11YU1U1%J6Y / VVCILCI T —4 T T-- /171.,...,-.,;,,.,, - LICUL" Ljoc I ICULILIXt6 Emissions Quality Mineral Resources 2 Noise ❑ Population / Housing El Public Services ❑ Recreation 0 Transportation/Traffic Utilities / Service Mandatory Findings of Significance Systems 3.3 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS This section analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed Project. I The issue areas evaluated in this Initial Study include: ■ Aesthetics ■ Land Use and Planning ■ Agriculture Resources ■ Mineral Resources ■ Air Quality and Global Warming ® Noise ■ Biological Resources ■ Population and Housing ■ Cultural Resources ■ Public Services ■ Geology and Soils ■ Recreation ■ Greenhouse Gas Emissions ■ Transportation/Traffic • Hazards and Hazardous Materials ® Utilities and Service Systems ■ Hydrology and Water Quality ■ Mandatory Findings of Significance The environmental analysis in this section is patterned after the Initial Study Checklist recommended by the City's CEQA Guidelines and used by the City in its environmental review process. For the preliminary environmental assessment undertaken as part of this Initial Study's preparation, a determination that there is a potential for significant effects indicates the need to more fully analyze the Project impacts and to identify mitigation. October 2014 Page 18 City of Baldwin Park TTM No. 72915 Section 3.0 Initial Study Check List Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration For the evaluation of potential impacts, the questions in the Initial Study Checklist are stated and an answer is provided according to the analysis undertaken as part of the Initial Study. The analysis considers the long -term, direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts of the proposed Project. To each question, the following are the four possible responses: ■ No Impact. The Project would not have any measurable environmental impact on the environment. ■ Less Than Significant Impact. The Project would have the potential for impacting the environment, although this impact will be below established thresholds that are considered to be significant. ■ Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. The Project would have the potential to generate impacts which may be considered as a significant effect on the environment, although mitigation measures or changes to the Project's physical or operational characteristics can reduce these impacts to levels that are less than significant. ■ Potentially Significant Impact. The Project would have impacts that are considered significant, and additional mitigation measures cannot reduce these impacts to less than significant levels. Where potential impacts are anticipated to be significant, mitigation measures are required so that impacts may be avoided or reduced to the extent feasible. City of Baldwin Park Page 19 October 2014 Section 3.0 Initial Study Check List TfM No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK October 2014 Page 20 City of Baldwin Park This section analyzes the potential environmental impacts that may resul from the proposed Project. For the evaluation ofpotential. impacts, the questions in the Initial Study Checklist (Section 3) are stated and ano*/ura are provided according tothe analysis undertaken as part of the Initial Study. The analysis considers the Project's short-term impacts (construction-related), and long-term impacts (operu6onol-relutad). � � �� a) Have u substantial adverse effect onu scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic Less Than Significant no|zo6uDy with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact 1:1 1:1 R1 resources, including, limited � ' trees, rock outcroppings, andhistoric buildings within u state scenic highway? c)Sobatandu1|vde8cadetheexiadn� ' ' [—1 �eo�dzsadrcorqoali�of the oi�and El C�[ 1:1 its surroundings? d) Create a new source ofsubstantial light or �� " ~ �� affect day or nighttime views inthe area? Would the u) Have u substantial adverse effect on o scenic vista? Less Than Significant Impact A scenic vista is generally defined as a view of undisturbed natural lands exhibiting a unique or uononul feature that comprises an important or dominant portion of the vievvabed. Scenic vistas may also be represented by u particular distant view that provides vianuJ relief from |eaa attractive views of nearby features. {}dber designated Federal and State )uuda, aa well ue local open space or recreational areas, may also offer scenic vistas if they represent a valued aesthetic view within the surrounding landscape. City ofBaldwin Park Page 21 October 2014 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis TTM No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration The proposed project would be constructed on land that previously contained residential and commercial development. The construction of the proposed project would not result in the removal of open space, recreational areas, or state lands. In certain locations within the project vicinity, there are occasional distant mountain views. The mountains are sporadically visible, but it would depend on the location of the viewer within the community. Not all of the surrounding community have mountain views because of existing development, existing mature trees, and climate conditions that hinder views. The project site is generally surrounded by existing urban development that includes commercial and residential uses. The proposed project may potentially hinder distant mountain views from adjacent areas, but because of existing development in the area, existing mature trees that sporadically AL1ituC1 views iii the [LiCa, and erratic uuacatc conditions that occur in the area, impacts are considered less than significant in this regard. b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? Determination: Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project is approximately 6 miles from the nearest highway that is eligible for State Designated Scenic Highway. Highway 39, which is northeast of the project site, is eligible for designation as a state scenic highway however it is not officially designated. The project site is also located on an area that contained existing single story development and as such it will not impact views of rock outcroppings or other scenic resources. There are existing trees on site that could potentially be viewed from the surrounding area. Any tree removal or trimming would be required to comply with the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance 1336. The project would also provide landscaping that would be reviewed and approved by the City. Because the project would be required to comply the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance, landscaping plans would be reviewed and approved by the City of Baldwin Park, and the project sites proximity /distance from a potentially scenic highway, impacts are considered less than significant. c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? Determination: Less than Significant Impact The project site contains structures that are vacant and subject to vandalism (graffiti), which potentially could degrade the aesthetic value of the surrounding community. The existing structures are proposed to be demolished and replaces with new structures. The proposed project includes the construction of three story residential units as well as a 69 -foot mono - eucalyptus cellular antenna and related components. The residential units will be constructed in accordance with applicable City guidelines and will be subject to City review prior to approval and construction. Development standards for the project site are established in the Kerman Specific Plan and have been incorporated into the design of the project. Substantial design review and integration was given to the construction of the cellular antenna due to its height and the residential development proposed on the site as well as the existing residential in the vicinity of the project. All machinery associated with the cellular antenna would be screened by visually integrated walls. The antenna, which would October 2014 Page 22 City of Baldwin Park TTM No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis be 69' tall, would be designed with a "mono - eucalyptus" design in order to screen the antenna and look more natural to the surrounding area (Refer to Exhibit 6, Conceptual Cellular Tower Elevation View). In order to incorporate the antenna /mono - eucalyptus with the visual character of the project, live trees, of a size and species to be approved by the City, with similar height2 and character, would be added as companion trees adjacent to the antenna /mono - eucalyptus. The project applicant has already initiated discussions with City staff in order to develop an antenna /mono- eucalyptus design that reduces visual impacts to the project vicinity while still achieving the project objectives. The antenna /mono- eucalyptus will continue to be subject to all City regulations and review prior to construction of the proposed project. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Determination. Less than Significant Impact The proposed Project would provide new lighting sources and add windows to the residential structures, which can potentially cause reflective window glare during various daytime conditions, and add lighting during nighttime conditions. The lighting or glare intensity caused by the future development would be similar to that which occurs in the Project area, as produced by the existing residential and commercial structures near the Project site. Furthermore, future Project development would be required to comply with the City's Municipal Code regulations regarding exterior lighting, security lighting, and shielded lighting, which would minimize lighting /glare impacts. Accordingly, implementation of the proposed Project would result in a less than significant impact due to new sources of light or glare. 2 Similar height to the extent feasible. City of Baldwin Park Page 23 October 2014 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis TTIVI No. 72915 Initial Study/mitigated Negative Declaration PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK October 2014 Page 24 City ofBaldwin Pork m U 3 r m° o' m U) G 0 .— N h F— W c • • x w Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis TTM No. 72915 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK October 2014 Page 26 City of Baldwin Park TTMNo.7Z915 Section 4.O Environmental Analysis Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration ------- AGRICULTURE ^ determining whether impacts to �� �� agricultural resources are significant Public Resources Code section 4526),nr environmental ` refer no the California * , � E, ( by the California Dept. ` Less Than "^C"`se`," ^' ".~s^^' optional � � ^ , � use in assessing impacts agriculture .� � ` No Significant ` and the �j� � ' ,] �/ " � � Impact ! Impact �~~ a) Convert Prime Farmland, Farmland, oz Farmland nfStatewide Importance (�arnJuod� as shown � d)8cau|tinthaloaaofforeat|andur ' ^ ' � maps prepared pursuant toth F-1 �� �� Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program nf the California Resources �� Agency, to non-agricultural use? b\ConUi�tvvithexia6n�zonin�for use? ' agricultural use, or u Williamson Act T- �_l contract? d Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section l2220k6\thnbor�ndbmdeMn�d6v `^'' ` ' �l �] �� �� �� c�� Public Resources Code section 4526),nr timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined byGovernment Code section 51104(g))? d)8cau|tinthaloaaofforeat|andur ' �� conversion od forest land tonon-forest �� use? e\ Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location F-| F-| [-1 �� �o or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? City of Baldwin Park Page 27 October 2014 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis TTM No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration Would the Project. a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non - agricultural use? Determination: No Impact According to the City of Baldwin Park General Plan, the project site is not designated as an agricultural use. The project site is not located within the California Department of Conservation 2010 Farmland Mapping and Monitoring program, and as such is not designated as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. Therefore, the proposed project would have no impact related to the conversion of a griculturat l a, d Znne�l by the City of Ralr3XnTin park nr rlecicrnatarl by the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program to non - agricultural uses. b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? Determination: No impact The proposed project site is located within the Single- Family Residential (R -1) and Mixed Use (MU -2) Zoning Designations, and. is designated as Single Family Residential and Neighborhood Commercial in the General Plan. As such, the site is not zoned to accommodate agricultural uses and the development of the proposed project would not conflict with any agricultural zoning. The Williamson Act requires a minimum of 100 acres for the establishment of an agricultural preserve. The project site, which consists of 3.6 acres, is far below the minimum requirements as defined within the Act. Due to the small size of the project site, zoning and existing development on the project site, the no impacts to agricultural zoning or Williamson Act contracts would occur. c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(8)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? Determination: No Impact As mentioned in the responses above, the project site is zoned for single- family residential and mixed use. The zoning in conjunction with the development located on the project site eliminates any impacts to timberland or timber production areas. Therefore, no impacts would occur. d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non forest use? Determination: No Impact As mentioned in the responses above, the project site does not contain any timberland or forestland. The project would also not result in the conversion of forestland to non - forestland. Therefore, no impacts would occur. e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non - agricultural use? Determination: No Impact As stated in the responses above. The proposed project would not result in the conversion of farmland to any non - agricultural use. No impacts would occur as a result of the project. October 2014 Page 28 City of Baldwin Park TfM No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration AIR QUALITY -- Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations"? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Would the Project: Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis ® ❑ Q ❑ Less Than �i u u Significant ` Potentially with '' Less Than ❑ Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact ® 1:1 10 ❑ 21 El El ® ❑ Q ❑ a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Determination: Less Than Significant The proposed project is located within the South Coast Air Basin (Basin), which is governed by the SCAQMD. On December 7, 2012, the SCAQMD Governing Board approved the 2012 Air Quality Management Plan (2012 AQMP), whichh outlines its strategies for meeting the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and ozone (Oa). According to the SCAQMD °s 2012 AQMP, two main criteria must be addressed. CRITERION 1: With respect to the first criterion, SCAQMD methodologies require that an air quality analysis for a project include forecasts of project emissions in relation to contributing to air quality violations and delay of attainment. City of Baldwin Park Page 29 October 2014 Wi �i u u ❑ ❑ ❑ a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Determination: Less Than Significant The proposed project is located within the South Coast Air Basin (Basin), which is governed by the SCAQMD. On December 7, 2012, the SCAQMD Governing Board approved the 2012 Air Quality Management Plan (2012 AQMP), whichh outlines its strategies for meeting the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and ozone (Oa). According to the SCAQMD °s 2012 AQMP, two main criteria must be addressed. CRITERION 1: With respect to the first criterion, SCAQMD methodologies require that an air quality analysis for a project include forecasts of project emissions in relation to contributing to air quality violations and delay of attainment. City of Baldwin Park Page 29 October 2014 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis TfM No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration Would the project result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations? Since the consistency criteria identified under the first criterion pertain to pollutant concentrations, rather than to total regional emissions, an analysis of a project's pollutant emissions relative to localized pollutant concentrations is used as the basis for evaluating project consistency. As discussed in Impact Statement 43(d), below, localized concentrations of carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and fugitive dust (PMlo and PM2.5) would be less than significant during project operations. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations. Because reactive organic gases (ROGs) are not a criteria pollutant, there is no ambient standard or localized threshold for ROGs. Due to the role ROG plays in ozone formation, it is classified as a precursor pollutant and only a regional emissions threshold has been established. Would the project cause or contribute to new air quality violations? As discussed in Impact Statement 4.3(b), operations of the proposed project would . result in emissions that would be below the SCAQMD operational thresholds. Therefore, the proposed project would not have the potential to cause or affect a violation of the ambient air quality standards. Would the project delay timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emissions reductions specified in the AQMP? The proposed project would result in less than significant impacts with regard to localized concentrations during project operations. As such, the proposed project would not delay the timely attainment of air quality standards or 2012 AQMP emissions reductions. With respect to the second criterion for determining consistency with SCAQMD and Southern California Association of Government's (SLAG) air quality policies, it is important to recognize that air quality planning within the Basin focuses on attainment of ambient air quality standards at the earliest feasible date. Projections for achieving air quality goals are based on assumptions regarding population, housing, and growth trends. Thus, the SCAQMD's second criterion for determining project consistency focuses on whether or not the proposed project exceeds the assumptions utilized in preparing the forecasts presented . in the 2012 AQMP. Determining whether or not a project exceeds the assumptions reflected in the 2012 AQMP involves the evaluation of the three criteria outlined below. The following discussion provides an analysis of each of these criteria. Would the project be consistent with the population, housing, and employment growth projections utilized in the preparation of the AQMP? In the case of the 2012 AQMP, three sources of data form the basis for the projections of air pollutant emissions: the City's General Plan, SCAG's Growth Management October 2014 Page 30 City of Baldwin Park TTM No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis Chapter of the Regional Comprehensive Plan (RCP), and SCAG's 2012 -2035 Regional Transportation Plan /Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP /SCS). The RTP /SCS also provides socioeconomic forecast projections of regional population growth. The project site is located within a specific plan area, which allows for a maximum. of 16 units per acre. The proposed project, while it would require a specific plan. amendment for the construction of residential units without any educational /commercial facilities outlined in the specific plan. However, the units would be constructed at a density of 14.1 units per acre, which is below the maximum density allowed by the specific plan. The population, housing, and employment forecasts, which are adopted by SCAG's Regional Council, are based on the local plans and policies applicable to the City. Additionally, as tine SCAQiv1D has incorporated these same projections into the 2012 AQMP, it can be concluded that the proposed project would be consistent with the projections. Would the project implement all feasible air quality mitigation measures? Compliance with all feasible emission reduction measures identified by the SCAQMD would be required as identified in Impact Statements 4.3(b). As such, the proposed project would meet this 2012 AQMP consistency criterion. Would the project be consistent with the land use planning strategies set forth in the AQMP? The proposed project would serve to implement various City and SCAG policies. The proposed project is located within a developed portion of the City, and is considered tv be an In"" devei JFment in the vicinity of a mix of residential use C. In conclusion, the determination of 2012 AQMP consistency is primarily concerned with the long -term influence of a project on air quality in the Basin. The proposed project would not result in a long -term impact on the region's ability to meet State and Federal air quality standards. Also, the proposed project would be consistent with the goals and policies of the AQMP for control of fugitive dust. As discussed above, the proposed project would also be consistent with SCAQMD and SCAG's goals and policies and is considered consistent with the 2012 AQMP. b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? Determination: Less Than Significant Impact SHORT -TERM EMISSIONS Construction related activities would generate short -term air quality impacts. Construction equipment would include tractors, dozers, graders, water trucks, excavators, scrapers, tractors, backhoes, pavers, rollers, and loaders. Exhaust emission factors for typical diesel - powered heavy equipment are based on the California Emissions Estimator Model. (CaIEEMod) program defaults. Variables factored into estimating the total construction emissions include the level of activity, length of construction period, number of pieces and types of equipment in use, site characteristics, weather conditions, number of construction personnel, and the amount of materials to be transported on- or off -site. The analysis of daily construction emissions has been prepared utilizing the CaIEEMod computer model. City of Baldwin Park Page 31 October 2014 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis TfM No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration Refer to Appendix A, Air Quality /Greenhouse Gas Data for the CalEEMod modeling outputs and results. Table 4.3 -1 Construction Related Emissions presents the anticipated daily short - term construction emissions. Table 4.3 -1: Construction Emissions Emissions Source Pollutant ( oundslda )' ROG NQ CQ J Sae I PM30 PM15 i Year 1 Unmitigated Emissions 7.13 88.63 66.56 0.13 21.36 12.83 Mitigated Emissions2,3,4 7.13 88.63 66.56 0.13 9.94 6.56 SCAQMD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55 Is T hreshold Exceeded After Mitigation? No NO No No NO ivo Year 2 Unmitigated Emissions 36.29 29.05 20.18 0.03 2.21 1.92 Mitigated Emissions23 l 36.29 I 29.05 I 20.18 0.03 2.16 l 1.91 l SCAQMD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55 Is Threshold Exceeded After Mitigation? No No No No No No Notes: 1. Emissions were calculated using CalEEMod, as recommended by the SCAQMD. 2. The reduction /credits for construction emission mitigations are based on mitigation included in CalEEMod and as typically required by the SCAQMD through Rule 403. The mitigation includes the following: properly maintain mobile and other construction equipment; replace ground cover in disturbed areas quickly; water exposed surfaces three times daily; cover stock piles with tarps; water all haul roads twice daily; and limit speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour. 3. Refer to Appendix A, Air Quality /Greenhouse Gas Data, for assumptions used in this analysis. Fugitive Dust Emissions Construction activities are a source of fugitive dust emissions that may have a substantial, temporary impact on local air quality. In addition, fugitive dust may be a nuisance to those living and working in the project area. Fugitive dust emissions are associated with land clearing, ground excavation, cut- and -fill, and truck travel on unpaved roadways (including demolition as well as construction activities). Fugitive dust emissions vary substantially from day to day, depending on the level of activity, specific operations, and weather conditions. Fugitive dust from grading, excavation and construction is expected to be short - term and would cease upon project completion. Additionally, most of this material is inert silicates, rather than the complex organic particulates released from combustion sources, which are more harmful to health. Dust (larger than 1.0 microns) generated by such activities usually becomes more of a local nuisance than a serious health problem. Of particular health concern is the amount of PM10 (particulate matter smaller than 10 microns) generated as a part of fugitive dust emissions. PM10 poses a serious health hazard alone or in combination with other pollutants. Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) is mostly produced by mechanical processes. These include automobile tire wear, industrial processes such as cutting and grinding, and re- suspension of particles from the ground or road surfaces by wind and human activities such as construction or agriculture. PM2.5 is mostly derived from combustion sources, such as automobiles, trucks, and other vehicle exhaust, as well as from stationary sources. These October 2014 Page 32 City of Baldwin Park TfM No. 72915 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration particles are either directly emitted or are formed in the atmosphere from the combustion of gases such as NOx and sulfur oxides (SOx) combining with ammonia. PM2.5 components from material in the earth's crust, such as dust, are also present, with the amount varying in. different locations. Mitigation Measure AQ -1 would implement dust control techniques (i.e., daily watering), limitations on construction hours, and adherence to SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 (which require watering of inactive and perimeter areas, track out requirements, etc.), to reduce PMjo and PM2.5 concentrations. As depicted in Table 4.3 -1, total PMio and PM2.5 emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD thresholds during construction. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. Construction Equipment and Worker Vehicle Exhaust Exhaust emissions front construction activities include emissions associated with the transport of machinery and supplies to and from the project site, emissions produced on -site as the equipment is used, and emissions from trucks transporting materials to /from the site. As presented in Table 4.3 -1, construction equipment and worker vehicle exhaust emissions would be below the established SCAQMD thresholds. Therefore, air quality impacts from equipment and vehicle exhaust emission would be less than significant. ROG Emissions In addition to gaseous and particulate emissions, the application of asphalt and surface coatings creates ROG emissions, which are 03 precursors. As required, all architectural coatings for the proposed project structures would comply with SCAQMD Regulation XI, Rule 1113 — Architectural Coating3. Rule 1113 provides specifications on painting practices as well as regulates the ROG content of paint. In addition to Rule 1113, Mitigation Measure AQ -2 requires the use of high- pressure -low- volume (HPLV) paint applicators with a minimum transfer efficiency of at least 50 percent and using pre - painted construction materials. Mitigation Measure AQ -2 also limits the ROG /VOC content of architectural. coatings (paints) to 50 grams per liter or less. Compliance with Mitigation Measure AQ -2 would ensure that emissions would be at less than significant levels. Asbestos Asbestos is a term used for several types of naturally occurring fibrous minerals that are a human health hazard when airborne. The most common type of asbestos is chrysotile, but other types such as tremolite and actinolite are also found in California. Asbestos is classified as a known human carcinogen by state, federal, and international agencies and was identified as a toxic air contaminant by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) in 1986. Asbestos can be released from serpentinite and ultramafic rocks when the rock is broken or crushed. At the point of release, the asbestos fibers may become airborne, causing air 3 South Coast Air Quality Management District, http: / /www.agmd.gov /rules /reg /reg11 /r1113.pdf. City of Baldwin Park Page 33 October 2014 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis TTM No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration quality and human health hazards. These rocks have been commonly used for unpaved gravel roads, landscaping, fill projects, and other improvement projects in some localities. Asbestos may be released to the atmosphere due to vehicular traffic on unpaved roads, during grading for development projects, and at quarry operations. All of these activities may have the effect of releasing potentially harmful asbestos into the air. Natural weathering and erosion processes can act on asbestos bearing rock and make it easier for asbestos fibers to become airborne if such rock is disturbed. According to the Department of Conservation Division of Mines and Geology, A General Location Guide for Ultramafic Rocks in California — Areas More Likely to Contain Naturally Occurring Asbestos Report (August 2000), serpentinite and ultramafic rocks are not known to occur within the project area. Titus, there would be no impact In this regard. Total Daily Construction Emissions In accordance with the SCAQMD Guidelines, CalEEMod was utilized to model construction emissions for ROG, NOX, CO, SOX, PMio, and PM2.5. CaIEEMod allows the user to input mitigation measures such as watering the construction area to limit fugitive dust. Mitigation measures that were input into CalEEMod allow for certain reduction credits and result in a decrease of pollutant emissions. Reduction credits are based upon studies developed by CARB, SCAQMD, and other air quality management districts throughout California, and were programmed within CalEEMod. As indicated in Table 4.3 -1, CalEEMod calculates the reduction associated with recommended mitigation measures. As indicated in Table 4.3 -1, impacts would be less than sign ficant for all criteria pollutants during construction. Implementation of standard SCAQMD measures (required by Mitigation Measure AQ -1) would further reduce these emissions. Thus, construction related air emissions would be less than significant. LONG -TERM EMISSIONS Mobile Source Emissions Mobile sources are emissions from motor vehicles, including tailpipe and evaporative emissions. Depending upon the pollutant being discussed, the potential air quality impact may be of either regional or local concern. For example, ROG, NOX, SOX, PMio, and PM2.5 are all pollutants of regional concern (NOX and ROG react with sunlight to form 03 [photochemical smog], and wind currents readily transport SOX, PMio, and PM2.5). However, CO tends to be a localized pollutant, dispersing rapidly at the source. According to the Traffic Impact Analysis, the proposed project would generate approximately 762 daily trips. Table 4.3 -2, Lon'- -Term 01erational Air Emissions, presents the anticipated mobile source emissions. As shown in Table 4.3 -2, unmitigated emissions generated by vehicle traffic associated with the proposed project would not exceed established SCAQMD thresholds. Impacts from mobile source air emissions would be less than significant. October 2014 Page 34 City of Baldwin Park TTM No. 72915 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration Area Source Emissions Area source emissions would be generated due to an increased demand for natural gas associated with the development of the proposed project. The primary use of natural gas producing area source emissions by the project would be for consumer products, architectural coating, and landscaping. As shown in Table 4.3 -2, area source emissions from the proposed project would not exceed SCAQMD thresholds for ROG, NOX, CO, SOX, PMio, or PM2.5. Table 4.3 -2: Lono -Term Operational Air Emissions Emissions Source Pollutant ( ounds/da )' ROG NOX: CO sox ,PM o PM2,5 Mobile Emissions2 2.21 6.50 24.87 0.05 3.82 1.08 Area Source Emissions2 1552 0.39 29.92 0.04 I 3,92 ]]!� 92 Energy Emissions2 0.04 0.38 0.16 0.00 0.03 .0 3 I Total Emissions 17.77 7.27 54.55 I 0.10 7.77 51 us" SCAQMD Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Is Threshold Exceeded? (Significant Impact?) No No No No No No Notes: 1. Based on CalEEMod modeling results, worst -case seasonal emissions for area and mobile emissions have been modeled, 2. Refer to Appendix A, Air Quafit /Greenhouse Gas Data, for assumptions used in this analysis. Energy Source Emissions Energy source emissions would be generated as a result of electricity and natural gas (non - hearth) usage associated with the proposed project. The primary use of electricity and natural gas by the project would be for space heating and cooling, water heating, ventilation, lighting, appliances, and electronics. As shown in Table 4.3 -2, energy source emissions from the proposed project would not exceed SCAQMD thresholds for ROG, NOX, CO, SOX, F'Mlo, or PM2.5. Diesel Fired — Back -Up Generators The proposed project would also include the use of an emergency diesel generator for each site in order to operate the cellular tower in the event of a power outage. Unless a power outage occurs, these generators would be operated for a maximum of one hour per month for routine testing and maintenance purposes. In order for generators to be considered an emergency backup generator by the SCAQMD, generators cannot operate more than 200 hours a year and can only operate in the event of an emergency power failure or for routine testing and maintenance. Furthermore, the SCAQMD has provided a list of models of equipment as meeting all applicable air quality requirements and have issued permits to the dealer /distributor of these engines. The Applicant would be required to obtain a permit to construct and a permit to operate the standby generators under SCAQMD Rules 201, 202, and 203. Under New Source Review (NSR), the generator would be required to meet Best Available Control Technology (BACT) requirements to minimize emissions of CO, ROG, NOx, and PMio. BACT standards for diesel -fired emergency generators specify a maximum allowable emissions rate of 8.5 grams City of Baldwin Park Page 35 October 2014 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis TTM No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration of carbon monoxide per horsepower -hour (hp -hr), 1.0 gram of ROG per hp -hr, 6.9 grams of NOx per hp -hr, and 0.38 gram of PMio per hp -hr. Sulfur dioxide emissions would be minor since the sulfur content of the diesel fuel would be limited to 0.05 percent by weight under SCAQMD Rule 431.2 (Sulfur Content of Liquid Fuels). Emergency equipment is exempt from modeling and offset requirements (Rule 1304) and does not require a health risk assessment (Rule 1401.). In addition to applying for a permit to construct from the SCAQMD, it would be necessary to apply for a Special Application for Temporary Emergency Authorization to Operate Electric Backup Generator(s) During Involuntary Power Service Interruptions Permit, as required in Mitigation Measure AQ -3. Implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ -3 would also ensure that the generators would be approved by the SCAQMD. Therefore, with implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ -3, associated with the operation of diesel- powered generators would be less than significant. MITIGATION MEASURES: AQ -1 Prior to issuance of any Grading Permit, the City Engineer shall confirm that the Grading Plan and specifications stipulate that, in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403, excessive fugitive dust emissions shall be controlled by regular watering or other dust prevention measures, as specified in the SCAQMD's Rules and Regulations. In addition, SCAQMD Rule 402 requires implementation of dust suppression techniques to prevent fugitive dust from creating a nuisance off -site. Implementation of the following measures would reduce short -term fugitive dust impacts on nearby sensitive receptors: • All active portions of the construction site shall be watered during daily construction activities and when dust is observed migrating from the project site to prevent excessive amounts of dust. The applicant shall submit a watering plan to control fugitive dust; • Pave or apply water every three hours during daily construction activities or apply non -toxic soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads, parking areas, and staging areas. More frequent watering shall occur if dust is observed migrating from the site during site disturbance; ■ Any on -site stockpiles of debris, dirt, or other dusty material shall be enclosed, covered, or watered twice daily, or non -toxic soil binders shall be applied; ■ All grading and excavation operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hour; ■ Disturbed areas shall be replaced with ground cover or paved immediately after construction is completed in the affected area; ■ Track -out devices such as gravel bed track -out aprons (3 inches deep, 25 feet long, 12 feet wide per lane and edged by rock berm or row of stakes) October 2014 Page 36 City of Baldwin Park TTM No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis shall be installed to reduce mud /dirt trackout from unpaved truck exit routes. Alternatively a wheel washer shall be used at truck exit routes; ■ On -site vehicle speed shall be limited to 15 miles per hour; • All material transported off -site shall be either sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust prior to departing the job site; and • Trucks associated with soil - hauling activities shall avoid residential . streets and utilize City - designated truck routes to the extent feasible. AO -2 The following measures shall be implemented by the contractor to reduce ROG emissions resulting from application of architectural coatings: • Use high - pressure -low- volume (HPLV) paint applicators with a minimum transfer efficiency of at least 50 percent; • Use pre - painted construction materials; and • VOC content of architectural coatings shall not exceed 50 grams per liter. AQ -3 Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall demonstrate to Baldwin. Park Community Development Department that the project would comply with SCAQMD Regulations and apply for a. Special Application for Temporary Emergency Authorization To Operate Electric Backup Generator(s) During Involuntary Power Service Interruptions Permit prior to installation and operation of the proposed emergency backup generators. c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? Determination: Less Than Significant With respect to the proposed project's construction - related air quality emissions and cumulative Basin -wide conditions, the SCAQMD has developed strategies to reduce criteria pollutant emissions outlined in the 2012 AQMP pursuant to Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) mandates. As such, the proposed project would comply with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements, and implement all feasible mitigation measures (Mitigation Measure AQ -1). Rule 403 requires that fugitive dust be controlled with the best available control measures in order to reduce dust so that it does not remain visible in the atmosphere beyond the property line of the proposed project. In addition, the proposed project would comply with adopted 2012 AQMP emissions control measures. Per SCAQMD rules and mandates, as well as the CEQA requirement that significant impacts be mitigated to the extent feasible, these same requirements (i.e., Rule 403 compliance, the implementation of all feasible mitigation measures, and compliance with adopted 2012 AQMP emissions control measures) would also be imposed on construction projects throughout the Basin, which would include related projects. City of Baldwin Park Page 37 October 2014 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis TTM No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration As discussed previously, the proposed project would not result in long -term air quality impacts, as emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD adopted. operational thresholds. Additionally, adherence to SCAQMD rules and regulations would alleviate potential impacts related to cumulative conditions on a project -by- project basis, Emission reduction technology, strategies, and plans are constantly being developed. As a result, the proposed project would not contribute a cumulatively considerable net increase of any nonattainment criteria pollutant. Therefore, cumulative operational impacts associated with implementation of the proposed project would be less than significant. d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Determination: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Sensitive receptors are defined as facilities or land uses that include members of the population that are particularly sensitive to the effects of air pollutants, such as children, the elderly, and people with illnesses. Examples of these sensitive receptors are residences, schools, hospitals, and daycare centers. CARB has identified the following groups of individuals as the most likely to be affected by air pollution: the elderly over 65, children under 14, athletes, and persons with cardiovascular and chronic respiratory diseases such as asthma, emphysema, and bronchitis. Sensitive receptors near the project site include surrounding residences adjacent to the north, south and east of the project site, and a mobile home park located to the west. In order to identify impacts to sensitive receptors, the SCAQMD recommends addressing localized significance thresholds (LSTs) for construction and operations impacts (area sources only). The CO hotspot analysis following the LST analysis addresses localized mobile source impacts. LOCALIZED SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS LSTs were developed in response to SCAQMD Governing Boards' Environmental Justice Enhancement Initiative (I -4). The SCAQMD provided the Final Localized. Significance Threshold Methodology (dated June 2003 [revised 20081) for guidance. The LST methodology assists lead agencies in analyzing localized air quality impacts. The SCAQMD provides the LST screening lookup tables for one, two, and five acre projects emitting CO, NOX, PM2.5, or PM1o. The LST methodology and associated mass rates are not designed to evaluate localized impacts from mobile sources traveling over the roadways. The SCAQMD recommends that any project over five acres should perform air quality dispersion modeling to assess impacts to nearby sensitive receptors. Based on the SCAQMD guidance on applying CalEEMod to LSTs, the project would disturb approximately five acres of land per day. Therefore, the LST thresholds for five acres were utilized for the construction LST analysis. As the nearest sensitive uses are adjacent to the project site, the LST value for 25 meters was utilized, as this is the most conservative option the methodology allows. Table 4.3-3, Localized Significance of Construction Emissions, shows the localized unmitigated and mitigated construction- related emissions. It is noted that the October 2014 Page 38 City of Baldwin Park iTM No. 72915 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration localized emissions presented in Table 4.3 -3 are less than those in Table 4.3 -1 because localized emissions include only on -site emissions (i.e., from construction equipment and fugitive dust), and do not include off -site emissions (i.e., from hauling activities). As seen in Table 4.3 -3, mitigated on -site emissions would not exceed the LSTs for SRA 17. Tahle 4.3 -3: Localized Significance of Construction Emissions Source Pollutant ( oundslda) NOx CO PM1Q PM4.5 Construction Year 1 Total Unmitigated On -Site Emissions' 56.89 42.63 21.15 12.77 Total Mitigated On -Site Emissions' 56.89 42.63 9.78 6.52 Localized Significance Threshoia3 168 1,597 10.73 6.6 Thresholds Exceeded? No No No No Year 2 Total Unmitigated On -Site Emissions2 28,51 18.51 1.97 1.85 Total Mitigated On -Site Emissions2 28.51 18.51 1.97 1.85 Localized Significance Threshold3 168 1,597 10.73 6.6 Thresholds Exceeded? No No No No Notes: 1. For construction Year 1, the site preparation phase emissions are presented as the worst case scenario. 2. For construction Year 2, the building construction phase emissions are presented as the worst case scenario. 3. The Localized Significance Threshold was determined using Appendix C of the SCAQMD Final Localized Significant Threshold Methodology guidance document for pollutants NOx, CO, PMio, and PM2.5. The Localized Significance Threshold was based on the anticipated daily acreage disturbance for construction (approximately 3.6 acres; therefore the thresholds were interpolated and a 3.6 -acre threshold was used), the total acreage for operational (uses the interpolated 3.6 -acre threshold), the distance to sensitive receptors, and the source receptor area (SRA 9). OPERATiONS As seen in Table 4.3 -4 Localized Significance of Operational Emissions, project- related mitigated operational area source emissions would be negligible and would be below the LSTs. Modeled area source emissions include the natural gas burning fireplaces and exclude the use of wood burning fireplaces per SCAQMD Rule 445. Therefore, operational LST impacts would be less than significant in this regard. Table 4.3 -4: Localized Significance of Operational Emissions Carbon Monoxide Hotspots CO emissions are a function of vehicle idling time, meteorological conditions, and traffic flow. Under certain extreme meteorological conditions, CO concentrations near a congested roadway or intersection may reach unhealthful levels (i.e., adversely affecting residents, school children, hospital patients, the elderly, etc.). City of Baldwin Park Page 39 October 2014 Pollutant ( dundslda ) Source liox CU " , PM3o PMz 5 Operational Mitigated Area Source Emissions' 0.05 4.29 0.08 0.08 Localized Si nificance Threshold 168 1,597 3.07 2 Thresholds Exceeded? No No No No Notes: 1. Area sources include natural gas burning fireplaces and exclude the use of wood burning fireplaces and wood burning stoves 7pe SCAQMD Rule 445 (Wood-Burning Devices). Carbon Monoxide Hotspots CO emissions are a function of vehicle idling time, meteorological conditions, and traffic flow. Under certain extreme meteorological conditions, CO concentrations near a congested roadway or intersection may reach unhealthful levels (i.e., adversely affecting residents, school children, hospital patients, the elderly, etc.). City of Baldwin Park Page 39 October 2014 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis T IVI No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration The SCAQMD requires a quantified assessment of CO hotspots when a project increases the volume -to- capacity ratio (also called the intersection capacity utilization) by 0.02 (two percent) for any intersection with an existing level of service LOS D or worse. Because traffic congestion is highest at intersections where vehicles queue and are subject to reduced speeds, these hot spots are typically produced at intersections. The City is located in the South Coast Air Basin (Basin), which is designated as an attainment /maintenance area for the Federal CO standards and an attainment area for State standards. There has been a decline in CO emissions even though vehicle miles traveled on U.S. urban and rural roads have increased. On -road mobile source CO emissions have declined 24 percent between 1989 and 1998, despite a 23 percent rise in motor vehicle miles traveled over the same 10 years. California trends have been consistent with national trends; CO emissions declined 20 percent in California frorn 1985 through 1097 while vehicle miles traveled increased 18 percent in the 1990s. Three major control programs have contributed to the reduced per - vehicle CO emissions: exhaust standards, cleaner burning fuels, and motor vehicle inspection /maintenance programs. A detailed CO analysis was conducted in the Federal Attainment Plan for Carbon Monoxide (CO Plan) for the SCAQMD's 2003 Air Quality Management Plan. The locations selected for microscale modeling in the CO Plan are worst -case intersections in the Basin, and would likely experience the highest CO concentrations. Thus, CO analysis within the CO Plan is utilized in a comparison to the proposed project, since it represents a worst -case scenario with heavy traffic volumes within the Basin. Of these locations, the Wiisiiire Boulevard /Veteran. Avenue intersection in Los Angeles experienced the highest CO concentration (4.6 parts per million [ppm]), which is well below the 35 -ppm 1 -hr CO Federal standard. The Wilshire Boulevard /Veteran Avenue intersection is one of the most congested intersections in Southern California with an average daily traffic (ADT) volume of approximately 100,000 vehicles per day. As the CO hotspots were not experienced at the Wilshire Boulevard /Veteran Avenue intersection, it can be reasonably inferred that CO hotspots would not be experienced at any intersections within the City of Baldwin Park near the project site due to the low volume of traffic (438 daily trips) that would occur as a result of project implementation. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant in this regard. MITIGATION MEASURES: Refer to Mitigation Measures AQ -1 and AQ -2. No additional mitigation is required. e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Determination: Less Than Significant Impact According to the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook, land uses associated with odor complaints typically include agricultural uses, wastewater treatment plants, food processing plants, chemical plants, composting, refineries, landfills, dairies, and fiberglass molding. The proposed project does not include any uses identified by the SCAQMD as being associated with odors. October 2014 Page 40 City of Baldwin Park l-fM No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis Construction activity associated with the project may generate detectable odors from heavy - duty equipment exhaust. Construction related odors would be short -term in nature and cease upon project completion. Any impacts to existing adjacent land uses would be short - term, as previously noted, and are considered less than significant given the project size. i : I I t ` Less Than Significant r(^, T n/'+TI-AT nu !lT T-1 - r' td' Potentially with l31V LllVl\..C1L 1 \L�SV LJl,." -" -- Would Significant Mitigation the project: Impact Incorporation a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Less Than Significant Impact' No Impact ❑ Q ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Q ❑ ❑ ❑ 21 ❑ ❑ ❑ City of Baldwin Park Page 41 October 2014 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? TfM No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration Less Than Significant Potentially with Significant Mitigation Impact Incorporation E, f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, El or other approved local, regional, or state habitat %v%servation plait? Would the Project: Less Than Significant No Impact Impact ❑ Q ❑ ❑ ❑ a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Determination: Less than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated The project site lies within the City of Baldwin Park, which is an urbanized community and largely built out. The project site has been developed and /or disturbed in the past and has supported an existing church facility, school facility, a wireless communication facility, and a commercial building, as well as several residences. No sensitive habitat is present on the property. Therefore, the project is generally not anticipated to directly impact any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Although the project site is disturbed and /or developed, mature trees are present on and adjacent to the site. These trees have the potential to be utilized by migratory birds that could be indirectly impacted during the construction phase due to noise, tree removal, and /or construction activity. The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) makes it unlawful to pursue, capture, kill, or possess or attempt to do the same to any migratory bird or part, nest, or egg of any such bird listed in wildlife protection treaties between the United States, Great Britain, Mexico, Japan, and the countries of the former Soviet Union, Mitigation Measure BIO -1 restricts the removal of any potential nesting habitat during the avian nesting season and requires clearance surveys and buffers to ensure that any nesting birds are protected. With implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO -1 and compliance with the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance, potential impacts on special status species would be reduced to a less than significant level. BIO -1 Pursuant to the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and California Department of Fish and Game Code, removal of any trees, shrubs, or any other potential nesting October 2014 Page 42 City of Baldwin Park T IVl No. 72915 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration habitat should be conducted outside the avian nesting season. The nesting season generally extends from early February through August, but can vary slightly from year to year based upon seasonal weather conditions. A pre- construction nesting bird clearance survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist 3 days prior to the commencement of any ground disturbing activities. Should any active nests be located on or within 300 feet of the project site (this buffer extends to 500 feet for raptor species), construction must comply with Migratory Bird Treaty Act and California Department of Fish and Game Code requirements, including an adequate construction buffer around active nests (if any), or avoiding construction during the species nesting season if an adequate buffer is 11 L1Cd.71.V1C. b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Determination: No Impact Refer to 4.4(a), above. The site is highly disturbed from both former and current development. A limited number of trees are present onsite and any removal will require compliance with. the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance. No rivers or streams or other surface waters are located on the property. As stated in the General Plan Final Program EIR (Appendix A — Initial Study), no known significant biological resources are located within the City. Therefore, the site does not support any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community. Therefore, no impact to such resources would occur with development of the property as proposed. No impacts would occur, and no mitigation measures are required. c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? Determination: No Impact Refer also to Response 4.4(a), above. The proposed project site is generally flat and does not contain any substantial natural drainage or surface water features, such as a stream or river. Additionally, according to the General Plan Final Program EIR (Appendix A — Initial Study), there are no known biological resources or federally- protected wetlands within the City of Baldwin Park. Therefore, the project would not have a substantial effect on federally - protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. No impacts would occur, and no mitigation measures are required. d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Determination: No Impact The project site lies within the City of Baldwin Park, which is a highly urbanized community. As stated above, the site has experienced substantial development and disturbance. The site is not located within a Multi- Species Habitat Conservation Plan, and no designated wildlife corridors are present within the City limits. Additionally, due to the disturbed /developed nature of the site, the site is not anticipated to be utilized by wildlife as City of Baldwin Park Page 43 October 2014 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis TTM No. 7I9l5 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration a movement or migratory corridor. Additionally, neither the project site nor surrounding lands are expected hn support native wildlife nursery sites. As u result, implementation of the proposed project would not uf6sot any migratory corridors orlinkages onoctothe vicinity of the project site. No impacts would occur, and no mitigation measures are required. e) Conflict with any local yo//c/es or ordinances protecting b/o/o%/co/ resources, such as u tree preservation policy orordinance? Determination: Less Than Significant hunuct. Refer to 4.4(a), above, regarding onsite conditions with regard to biological resources. Development of the project site as proposed would potentially require the removal of mature trees onaha to accommodate the proposed uses. However, landscaping would be installed mnaihe, cooaie{rot with the adopted project Landscape Plan, following the construction phase. The applicant would be required to adhere to Ordinance 1336i vvbid' relates totree preservation and protection. Pursuant toOrdinance 1336, removal of any mature or required breo will be required to «ocnp\v with the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance, which requires the submittal and approval of a Mature Tree Trimming and/or Removal Application, and obtaining a permit from the Tree Officer. Because the project would be required to comply with Ordinance 1336, impacts are considered less than significant. ) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved kcal, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? "eternatna-11-ion: No Impact Baldwin Park is not within the jurisdiction of any habitat conservation plan, natural community conservation plan, or any other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan. The closest habitat conservation area is a County of Los Angeles Significant Ecological Area (SEA) (Area #23, San Gabriel Canyon). The SEA is located approximately 2.5 nhbo to the northeast ofthe project site. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in an impact with regard to conflict with an adopted conservation plan. No impacts would occur, and no mitigation measures are required. 4.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES ^ CULTURAL RESOURCES — vyvuld the Potentially � ��/ :�. project: #^`*�/��� ^ �� Impact �[a�eo���u��a�e�e in � - l �esi8nUlcanceofab�hodcd [- resource �� ao defined io'I5O64.57 Less Than � Significant / � with Less Than Mitigation Significant No Incorporation Impact ~�p-c~ 1:1 FO 1:1 October 2014 Page 44 City of Baldwin Park TTM No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration CULTURAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to '1.5064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or rnniniia ffPninoir fonfiire? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Would the Project: Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis Less Than Significant Potentially with Significant Mitigation Impact Incorporation ■ ■ ■ Less Than Significant No Impact', Impact ❑ ❑ ® � Q ❑ Q a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in CEQA Guidelines § 15064.5? Determination: Less Than Significant Impact. Historic resources generally consist of buildings, structures, improvements, and remnants associated with a significant historic event or person(s) and /or have a historically significant style, design, or achievement. Damage to or demolition of such resources is typically considered to be a Significant impact. impacts to historic resources can occur through direct impacts, such as destruction or removal, and through indirect impacts, such as a change in the setting of a historic resource. The City's General Plan Open Space and Conservation Element identifies several structures of regional and local importance within the City limits, as determined by the Baldwin Park Historical Society. Such resources are recommended for preservation. Additionally, the City's Zoning Code contains a Historic Resources Code that protects and encourages preservation of the City's heritage. Under the Historic Resources Code, the City Planning Commission acts as the Historic Resources Advisory Committee for the review of alterations to potentially historic buildings and other activities that may affect potentially historic resources. No known historic resources are present on the project site. The project does not propose to change the historic designations of any recognized historical sites or structures and would not change or have any effect upon the City's existing preservation objectives or policies. The existing structures proposed for demolition on the project site were built as early as the late 1920's through the 1970's, but are not listed as historical structures in the City's Open Space and Conservation Element. The project would be required to comply with the City's Ordinance 153.080, Historic Overlay Zone, and would require a Historic Structure Demolition Permit if any structures on site would be determined as a. historic structure. The project site is within the Kerman Specific Plan area and not within the Historic Overlay Zone. Further, the proposed project would not authorize any adverse impacts to a historical City of Baldwin Park Page 45 October 2014 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis TTM No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration resource. Therefore, no impacts on historic resources would occur with the project, and no mitigation measures are required. b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 15064.5? Determination: No Impact Archaeological sites are locations that contain resources associated with former human activities. Archaeological sites may contain such resources as human skeletal remains, waste from tool manufacture, tool concentrations, and /or discoloration or accumulation of soil or food remains. As stated in the Initial Study prepared for the General Plan. Final Program. EIR (included as Appendix A of the EIR), the City of Baldwin Park is largely built out and does not contain any known archaeological resources. Therefore, the potential for uncovering such resources within the City is considered to be remote. As such, the General Plan Final. Program EIR determined that no impacts on historical and cultural resources would occur with future buildout of the General Plan. As stated above, previous onsite construction and other human activities have likely disturbed or destroyed any archaeological resources that may have been present in the past. The potential for uncovering such significant resources during project grading or excavation activities is therefore considered to be low. As such, no substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource would result with implementation of the project. No impacts would occur in this regard, and no mitigation measures are required. c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Determination: No Impact Paleontological resources are the preserved fossilized remains of plants and animals. Fossils and traces of fossils are preserved in sedimentary rock units, particularly fine- to medium - grained marine, lake, and stream deposits, such as limestone, siltstone, sandstone, or shale, and in ancient soils (paleosols). They are also found in coarse - grained sediments, such as conglomerates or coarse alluvium sediments. Fossils are rarely preserved in igneous or metamorphic rock units. Fossils may occur throughout a sedimentary unit and, in fact, are more likely to be preserved subsurface, where they have not been damaged or destroyed by previous ground disturbance, amateur collecting, or natural causes such as erosion. In contrast, archaeological and historic resources are often recognized by surface evidence of their presence. As stated above, the City of Baldwin Park is largely built out. The General Plan Final Program EIR indicates that the City does not contain any known paleontological resources. Previous land development and other human activities have likely disturbed or destroyed any paleontological resources that may have been present onsite in the past. The potential for uncovering significant paleontological resources during new construction or redevelopment projects is therefore considered to be remote. As such, project implementation would not adversely impact paleontological resources. No impacts would occur, and no mitigation measures are required. October 2014 Page 46 City of Baldwin Park TTM No. 72915 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Ground - disturbing activities, such as grading or excavation, have the potential to disturb human remains. If human remains are found, such remains would require proper treatment, in accordance with applicable local, State, and federal laws. The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) includes provisions for unclaimed and culturally unidentifiable Native American cultural items, intentional and inadvertent discovery of Native American cultural items on federal and tribal lands, and penalties for noncompliance and illegal trafficking. State of California Public Resources Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 -7055 describes the general provisions regarding human remains, including the requirements if any human remains are accidentally discovered during excavation of a site. As required by State law, and as applicable to project construction activities, the requirements and procedures set forth in Section 5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code would be implemented, including notification of the County Coroner, notification of the Native American Heritage Commission and consultation with the individual identified by the Native American Heritage Commission to be the "most likely descendant." If human remains are found during excavation, excavation must stop in the vicinity of the find and any area that is reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains until the County Coroner has been called to the site, and the remains have been investigated and appropriate recommendations have been made for the treatment and disposition of the remains. Project compliance with federal and State regulations, which detail the appropriate actions necessary in the event human remains are encountered, would ensure that impacts on unknown human remains would remain less than significant, and no mitigation measures are required. City of Baldwin Park Page 47 October 2014 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis TTM No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration 4.6 GEOLOGYAND SOILS Less Than Significant GEOLOGY AND SOILS -- Would the Potentially Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant No project: Impact Incorporation Impact Impact a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State ❑ 1-21 El Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ❑ ❑ ❑ iii) Seismic - related ground failure, ® Q including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? ❑ n b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and ® ® Q potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 -1 -B of the Uniform Building Code (2004), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems ❑ ❑ ❑ Q where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? October 2014 Page 48 City of Baldwin Park TTm No. 72915 Initial Study /mitigated Negative Declaration Would the Project: Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. Determination: Less Than Significant Impact. The City of Baldwin Park, like the rest of southern California, is located within a seismically - active region as the result of being located near the active margin between the North American and Pacific tectonic plates. As stated in the Public Safety Element of the General Plan, there are no active known faults within the City of Baldwin Park. However, several major faults do exist within the region and have the potential to cause damage within the City. The most significant known active fault zones that are capable of seismic ground shaking and can impact the City are the Whittier - Elsinore Fault Zone, Newport - Inglewood. Fault Zone, San Andreas Fault Zone, and San Gabriel Fault Zone, as well as the lesser San Fernando /Sierra Madre - Cucamonga Fault Zone, Raymond Hill Fault Zone, Verdugo Fault Zone, and Chino Fault Zone, according to Figure PS -1, Regional Fault Zones, in the Public Safety Element of the General Plan. Because Baldwin Park is subject to strong ground shaking in the event of a major earthquake on regional faults, all construction is required to occur in compliance with the most current California Building Code (CBC) requirements. Additionally, compliance with existing local City building standards and other applicable seismic - related design requirements would further reduce the potential for damage to occur as the result of rupture of known earthquake faults in the region. The project site is not located within a designated Alquist- Priolo or Los Angeles County Fault Hazard Zone, as indicated by the Public Safety Element, Figure PS -1, Regional Fault Zones, of the General Plan. Ground rupture is generally considered most likely to occur along pre - existing active faults. According to the General Plan, no known faults exist on the project site or within the general vicinity of the site. Therefore, the potential for ground rupture to occur on the site is low. Future development of the project site would include grading and /or other ground - disturbing activities to allow for the proposed residential development and communication towers. Based on the conditions described above, no proposed building pads or structures would be placed within a fault setback zone. Project compliance with the CBC and other applicable local seismic - related building requirements would reduce the potential for impacts to occur from the exposure of people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects as the result of fault rupture. Therefore, project impacts are considered to be less than significant, and no mitigation measures are required. City of Baldwin Park Page 49 October 2014 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis TTM No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? Determination: Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed in Response 4.6(a)(i), several faults are present within the surrounding region having the potential to create strong seismic ground shaking. Therefore, the project site could be exposed to ground shaking during seismic events. Construction of the future residential building pads and the design and engineering of the residential structures and wireless communication facilities would be required to comply with the City's Building Code and the CBC. Additionally, the General Plan Public Safety Element includes goals and policies to protect the community of Baldwin Park from risks associated with seismic hazards. Compliance with the codes and regulations discussed above would lessen potential project impacts associated with fault rupture and strong seismic groundshaking to a level of less than significant, and no mitigation measures are required. iii) Seismic - related ground failure, including liquefaction? Determination: Less Than Significant Impact. The occurrence of liquefaction and seismically - induced settlement or ground failure is generally related to strong seismic shaking events where the groundwater table occurs at a relatively shallow depth (generally within 50 feet of the ground surface), or where lands are underlain by loose, cohesionless deposits. Liquefaction generally results in the loss of shear strength of a soil, which occurs due to the increase of pore water pressure caused by the rearrangement of soil particles induced by shaking or vibration. During liquefaction, soil strata typically behave similar to a heavy fluid. As depth to groundwater within the City of Baldwin Park is generally greater than 50 feet below ground surface (bgs), the potential for liquefaction to occur is considered to be low. However, according to Section 2.9, Geology and Soils, of the General Plan. Final Program EIR, the Division of Mines and Geology Division of the California Department of Conservation has identified the southwestern portion of the City as being subject to liquefaction. The project site is not located within this area. The preliminary Soil Engineering Investigation prepared for the project site by The Soil Guys (May 2006) indicated depth to groundwater at the site is greater than 15 feet bgs. This is consistent with other groundwater data available for the proposed project area which indicates the highest recorded groundwater levels at 60 feet bgs, with the majority of data commonly indicating groundwater levels at greater than 100 feet bgs. Further, due to the very dense coarse grained soils, tightly bedded pebbles, and boulders found onsite, combined with the lack of shallow groundwater, the potential for liquefaction to occur on the project site is considered to be low. Placement and compaction of any fill material for the proposed residential structures shall be performed in accordance with the City of Baldwin Park grading standards and to the satisfaction of a qualified geotechnical engineer. In addition, the project would be required to comply with the CBC, as well as applicable General. Plan policies and City codes and regulations. As the site is not located within a designated. October 2014 Page 50 City of Baldwin Park TTM No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis Alquist- Priolo Fault Zone, Los Angeles County Fault Hazard Zone, or in an area susceptible to liquefaction hazards, impacts associated with ground failure, including liquefaction and settlement, are considered to be less than significant. No mitigation measures are required. iv) Landslides? Determination: No Impact. According to the Initial Study prepared in support of the General Plan Final. Program FIR (Appendix A — Initial Study and Notice of Preparation of the EIR), the Division of Mines and Geology Division of the California Department of Conservation does not identify any areas subject to landslides on the Baldwin Park TT (TT44,41 nna ,1rancb, Topography within the City is relatively flat. No canyons or steep topographic features are present. Similarly, the project site and surrounding lands are relatively fiat, and therefore, landslides are not considered to be a hazard. No impacts relative to landslides are anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required. b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Determination: Less Than Significant Grading and trenching during the construction phase of the project would displace soils and temporarily increase the potential for soils to be subject to wind and water erosion. Soil erosion is most prevalent in unconsolidated alluvium and surficial soils and in areas that have slopes. The project Applicant would be required to meet City of Baldwin Park grading standards, and as required, would prepare site - specific grading plans to be signed by a registered civil engineer. Further, the Applicant would be required to prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan in accordance with General Permit Order No. R4- 2012 -0175 (as of 12/28/2012 - San Gabriel Watershed Reaches 3 & 4), for approval by the City prior to grading. These plans would identify site - specific Best Management Practices (BMPs) to be implemented with the proposed development in order to prevent erosion, minimize siltation from impacting downstream water bodies, and protect water quality. Implementation of the project would occur in compliance with such plans and grading standards, as discussed above. With such compliance, project impacts with regard to soil erosion or the loss of topsoil are considered to be less than significant, and no mitigation measures are required. c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on -or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Lateral spreading is a phenomenon in which large blocks of intact, non - liquefied soil move down slope on a liquefied soil layer. Lateral spreading is often a regional event. For lateral spreading to occur, the liquefiable soil zone must be laterally continuous, unconstrained laterally, and free to move along sloping ground. Liquefaction and. seismically- induced settlement or ground failure are generally associated with strong seismic shaking in areas where groundwater tables occur at relatively shallow depths (within 50 feet bgs) or when City of Baldwin Park Page 51 October 2014 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis TTM No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration land is underlain by loose, cohesionless deposits. As stated above, depth to groundwater at the project site is anticipated to be greater than 50 feet bgs. Additionally, according to the Initial Study prepared in support of the General Plan Final Program EIR (Appendix A — Initial Study and Notice of Preparation oL the EIR), the City does not contain any areas susceptible to subsidence. During site - specific geologic testing performed in 2013 (Duco Engineering, May 2013), fill soils were documented onsite, largely associated with prior development on the property; localized fills may be deeper and associated with past grading and unforeseen subsurface structures. Such soils were found to be soft, silty sands, some with gravel overlying natural silty sand. These soils are composed of material similar to the onsite natural soils and found within the top one foot. Such soils are not suitable for support of foundations and would be removed and re- compacted with project development to ensure the absence of any unstable soils. Because the project site is not located within a designated Alquist- Priolo, Los Angeles County Fault Hazard Zone, or in an area susceptible to liquefaction hazards, impacts associated with ground failure, including landslides, liquefaction, lateral spreading, and settlement, are considered to be less than significant with project compliance with the CBC and applicable local codes and building standards. Refer also to Responses 4.6(a)(ii) through 4.6(a)(iv), above, for additional discussion. Project impacts relative to unstable geologic units or soils would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures are required. d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 -1 -B of the Uniform Building Code (2004), creating substantial risks to life or property? Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Expansive soils are those that undergo volume changes as moisture content fluctuates, swelling substantially when wet or shrinking when dry. Soil expansion can damage structures by cracking foundations, causing settlement, and distorting structural elements. The site - specific geologic testing performed in 2013 (Duco Engineering, May 2013) determined that soils onsite have a very low expansion potential. Future development of the proposed residential units onsite would be subject to a site - specific geologic study, prior to issuance of a grading permit, to identify measures that would lessen potential impacts related to expansive soils, as appropriate. In addition, all future development on the project site would be required to comply with the CBC, which contains minimum design requirements for construction on expansive soils. Therefore, project impacts relative to potential risks to life and property from expansive soils would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures are required. e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Determination: No Impacts Baldwin Park does not allow the use of septic systems for wastewater disposal; the proposed project does not include the use of septic systems or other alternative wastewater disposal systems. The project will utilize a gravity sewer system that will connect to the October 2014 Page 52 City of Baldwin Park TfM No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis City's existing public sewer and wastewater treatment systems, consistent with City engineering requirements. The need for wastewater disposal via the use of septic tanks would not be required. Therefore, no impacts would occur in this regard, and no mitigation measures are required. MAWCUMVIRR10141 GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE California is a substantial contributor of global greenhouse gases (GHGs), emitting over 400 million tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) per year.4 Climate studies indicate that California is likely to see an increase of three to four degrees Fahrenheit over the next century. Methane (CH4) is also an important GHG that potentially contributes to global climate change. GHGs are global in their effect, which is to increase the earth's ability to absorb heat in the atmosphere. As primary GHGs have a long lifetime in the atmosphere, accumulate over time, and are generally well- mixed, their impact on the atmosphere is mostly independent of the point of emission. The impact of human activities on global climate change is apparent in the observational record. Air trapped by ice has been extracted from core samples taken from polar ice sheets to determine the global atmospheric variation of CO2, CH4, and nitrous oxide (N20) from before the start of industrialization (approximately 1750), to over 650,000 years ago. For that period, it was found that CO2 concentrations ranged from 180 to 300 parts per million. For the period from approximately 1750 to the present, global CO2 concentrations increased from a pre - industrialization period concentration of 280 to 379 parts per million in 2005, with the 2005 value far exceeding the upper end of the pre- industrial period range. 4 California Energy Commission, Inventory of California Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990 to 2004, 2006. City of Baldwin Park Page 53 October 2014 Less Than Significant GRE- r HO r TST7 GAS EMISSIONS - E �� � Potentially with Less Than No Significant Mitigation Significant Would the project: Impact Incorporation Impact Impact- a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may El have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the El purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE California is a substantial contributor of global greenhouse gases (GHGs), emitting over 400 million tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) per year.4 Climate studies indicate that California is likely to see an increase of three to four degrees Fahrenheit over the next century. Methane (CH4) is also an important GHG that potentially contributes to global climate change. GHGs are global in their effect, which is to increase the earth's ability to absorb heat in the atmosphere. As primary GHGs have a long lifetime in the atmosphere, accumulate over time, and are generally well- mixed, their impact on the atmosphere is mostly independent of the point of emission. The impact of human activities on global climate change is apparent in the observational record. Air trapped by ice has been extracted from core samples taken from polar ice sheets to determine the global atmospheric variation of CO2, CH4, and nitrous oxide (N20) from before the start of industrialization (approximately 1750), to over 650,000 years ago. For that period, it was found that CO2 concentrations ranged from 180 to 300 parts per million. For the period from approximately 1750 to the present, global CO2 concentrations increased from a pre - industrialization period concentration of 280 to 379 parts per million in 2005, with the 2005 value far exceeding the upper end of the pre- industrial period range. 4 California Energy Commission, Inventory of California Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990 to 2004, 2006. City of Baldwin Park Page 53 October 2014 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis TTM No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration REGULATIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) developed several emission trajectories of GHGs needed to stabilize global temperatures and climate change impacts, It concluded that a stabilization of GHGs at 400 to 450 parts per million CO2 equivalent' (CO2eq) concentration is required to keep global mean warming below two degrees Celsius, which in turn is assumed to be necessary to avoid significant levels of climate change. Executive Order S -3 -05 was issued in June 2005, which established the following GHG emission reduction targets: ■ 2010: Reduce GHG emissions to 2000 levels ■ 2020: Reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels ■ 2050: Reduce GHG emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32) requires that the California Air Resources Board (GARB) determine what the statewide GHG emissions level was in 1990, and approve a statewide GHG emissions limit that is equivalent to that level, to be achieved by 2020. CARB has approved a 2020 emissions limit of 427 million metric tons (MT) of CO2eq (MTCO2eq). Due to the nature of global climate change, it is not anticipated that any single development project would have a substantial effect on global climate change. In actuality, GHG emissions from the proposed project would combine with emissions emitted across California, the United States, and the world to cumulatively contribute to global climate change. In June 2008, the California Governor's Office of Planning and Research published a Technical Advisory, which provides informal guidance for public agencies as they address the issue of climate change in CEQA documents.' This is assessed by determining whether a proposed project is consistent with or obstructs the 39 Recommended Actions identified by CARB in its Climate Change Scoping Plan which includes nine Early Action Measures (qualitative approach). The Attorney General's Mitigation. Measures identify areas were GHG emissions reductions can be achieved in order to achieve the goals of AB 32. As set forth in the California Governor's Office of Planning and Research Technical Advisory and in the proposed amendments to the CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.4, this analysis examines whether the proposed project's GHG emissions are significant based on a qualitative and performance based standard (Proposed CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.4(a)(1) and (2)). South Coast Air Quality Management District Thresholds On December 5, 2008, the SCAQMD adopted GHG significance thresholds for Stationary Sources, Rules, and Plans where the SCAQMD is lead agency. The threshold uses a tiered approach. A proposed project is compared with the requirements of each tier sequentially 5 Carbon Dioxide Equivalent —A metric measure used to compare the emissions from various greenhouse gases based upon their global warming potential. 6 Governor's Office of Planning and Research, CEQA and Climate Change: Addressing Climate Change Through California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Review, 2008. October 2014 Page 54 City of Baldwin Park TfM No. 72915 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration and would not result in a significant impact if it complies with any tier. Tier 1 excludes projects that are specifically exempt from Senate Bill 97 from resulting in a significant impact. Tier 2 excludes projects that are consistent with a GHG reduction plan that has a. certified final CEQA document and complies with AB 32 GHG reduction goals. Tier 3 excludes projects with annual emissions lower than a screening threshold. For industrial stationary source projects, the SCAQMD adopted a screening threshold. of 10,000 MTCO2eq per year (MTCO2eq /yr). This threshold was selected to capture 90 percent of the GHG emissions from these types of projects where the combustion of natural gas is the primary source of GHG emissions. The SCAQMD concluded that projects with emissions less than the screening threshold would not result in a significant cumulative impact. Tier 4 consists of Lll1CC UCC1J1Vll LreC options. 'Under L1 LC 111JL VpL1V1L, MU plojJ VSeU project wV'lAlU LJC excluded if design features and /or mitigation measures resulted in emissions 30 percent lower than business as usual (BAU) emissions. Under the second option the proposed project would be excluded if it had early compliance with AB 32 through early implementation of California Air Resources Board's Climate Change Scoping Plan measures. Under the third option, the proposed project would be excluded if it met sector based performance standards. However, the specifics of the Tier 4 compliance options were not adopted by the SCAQMD Board in order to allow further time to develop the options and coordinate with CARB's GHG significance threshold development efforts. Tier 5 would exclude projects that implement off -site mitigation (GHG reduction projects) or purchase offsets to reduce GHG emission impacts to less than the proposed screening level. While not adopted by the SCAQMD Board, the guidance document prepared for the stationary source threshold also suggested the same tiered approach for residential and commercial projects with a 3,000 MTCO2eq /yr screening threshold. However, at the time of adoption of the industrial stationary source threshold, the SCAQMD felt additional analysis was required along with coordination with CARB's GHG significance threshold development efforts. At the November 2009 meeting of the SCAQMD GHG working group, SCAQMD staff presented two options for screening thresholds for residential and commercial projects. The first option would have different thresholds for specific land uses. The proposed threshold for residential projects is 3,500 MTCO2eq /yr, the commercial threshold is 1,400 MTCO2eq /yr, and the mixed -use threshold is 3,000 MTCO2eq /yr. The second option would apply the 3,000 MTCO2eq /yr screening threshold for all commercial /residential projects. Lead agencies would be able to select either option. These thresholds are based on capturing 90 percent of the emissions from projects and requiring them to comply with the higher tiers of the threshold (i.e., performance requirements or GHG reductions outside of the project) to not result in a significant impact. SCAQMD staff also presented updates for compliance options for Tier 4 of the significance thresholds. The first option would be a reduction of 23.9 percent in GHG emissions over the base case. This percentage reduction represents the land use sector portion of the CARB's Climate Change Scoping Plan's overall reduction of 28 percent. This target would be updated as the AB 32 Climate Change Scoping Plan is revised. The base case scenario for this reduction City of Baldwin Park Page 55 October 2014 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis TfM No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration still needs to be defined. Residual emissions would need to be less than 25,000 MTCO2eq /yr to comply with the option. Staff proposed efficiency targets for the third option of 4.6 MTCO2eq /yr per service population (population plus employment) for project level analysis and 6.6 MTCO2eq /yr for plan level analyses. For project level analyses, residual emissions would need to be less than 25,000 MTCO2eq /yr to comply with this option. At the most recent meeting of the SCAQMD GHG working group, SCAQMD staff recommended extending the 10,000 MTCO2eq /yr industrial project threshold for use by all lead agencies. The two options for land -use thresholds were reiterated with a recommendation that lead agencies use the second, 3,000 MTCO2eq /yr threshold for all non- industrial development projects. Staff indicated that they would not be recommending a specific approach to address the first option of Tier 4, Percent Emissions Reduction Target. If lead agencies enquire about using this approach staff will reference the approach recommended by the San Toaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District and describe the challenges to using this approach. For the third option of Tier 4, SCAQMD staff re- calculated the recommended Tier 4 efficiency targets for project level analyses to 4.8 MTCO2eq /yr in 2020 and 3.0 MTCO2eq /yr in 2035. The recommended plan level analysis efficiency target remains 6.6 MTCO2eq /yr for 2020, but was lowered to 4.1 MTCO2eq /yr for 2035. SCAQMD staff also stated that they are no longer proposing to include a 25,000 MTCO2eq /yr maximum emissions requirement for compliance with Tier 4. Staff indicated that they hoped to bring the proposed GHG significance thresholds to the board for their December 2010 meeting; however, this did not occur. For the proposed project, the 3,000 MTCO2eq /yr non - industrial screening threshold is used as the significance threshold in addition to the qualitative thresholds of significance set forth below from Section VII of CEQA Guidelines Appendix G. Would the Project. a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? Determination: Less Than Significant Impact The proposed project would result in direct and indirect emissions of CO2, CH4, and N20, and would not result in other GHGs that would facilitate a meaningful analysis. Therefore, this analysis focuses on these three forms of GHG emissions. Direct proposed project - related GHG emissions include emissions from construction activities, area sources, and mobile sources, while indirect sources include emissions from electricity consumption, water demand, and solid waste generation. Operational GHG estimations are based on energy emissions from natural gas usage and automobile emissions. The California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) relies upon trip data within the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by RBF Consulting and project- specific land use data to calculate emissions. The proposed project includes the development of 80 single- family residential units. Therefore, Table 4.7 -1 Estimated Greenhouse Gas Emissions presents the estimated CO2, CH4, and N20 emissions of the proposed project. The CalEEMod outputs are contained within the Appendix 7 1 Air Quality /Greenhouse Gas Data. October 2014 Page 56 City of Baldwin Park TTM No. 72915 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration Table 4.7 -1: Estimated Greenhouse Gas Emissions DIRECT PROPOSED PROJECT - RELATED SOURCES OF GREENHOUSE GASES Construction Emissions. Construction GHG emissions are typically summed and amortized over the lifetime of a project (assumed to be 30 years), then added to the operational emissions.' As seen in Table 4.7 -1, the proposed project would result in 22.40 MTCO2eq /yr (amortized over 30 years). Area Source. Area source emissions were calculated using CalEEMod and project- specific land use data. As noted in Table 4.7 -1, the proposed project would result in 17.23 MTCO2eq /yr of area sources GHG emissions. Mobile Source. CalEEMod relies upon trip data within the Traffic Impact Analysis and project specific land use data to calculate mobile source emissions. The proposed project would directly result in 750.27 MTCO2eq /yr of mobile source - generated GHG emissions; refer to Table 4.7 -1. INDIRECT PROPOSED PROJECT - RELATED SOURCES OF GREENHOUSE GASES Energy Consumption. Energy consumption emissions were calculated using CalEEMod and project- specific land use data. Electricity would be provided to the project site via. Southern California Edison. The proposed project would indirectly result in 188.48 MTCO2eq /yr due to energy consumption; refer to Table 4.7 -1. Water Demand. The proposed project's operations would result in a demand of approximately 8.5 million gallons of water per year. Emissions from indirect energy impacts due to water supply would result in 38.92 MTCO2eq /yr; refer to Table 4.7 -1. Solid Waste. Solid waste associated with operations of the proposed project would result in 14.85 MTCO2eq /yr; refer to Table 4.7 -1. The project lifetime is based on the standard 30 -year assumption of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (http: / /www.agmd.gov /hb /2008 /December /081231a.htm). City of Baldwin Park Page 57 October 2014 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis TTM No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration TOTAL PROPOSED PROJECT- RELATED SOURCES OF GREENHOUSE GASES As shown in Table 4.7 -1, the total amount of proposed project- related. BAU GHG emissions from direct and indirect sources combined would total 1,032.15 MTCO2eq /yr. Although the proposed project's GHG emissions are below the 3,000 MTCO2eq /yr GHG threshold, the proposed project includes design features that would further reduce project - related GHG emissions. The proposed project would comply with Title 24 requirements as well as the California Green Building Code standards. The project proposes to install energy efficient lighting and appliances throughout the project site. Additionally, the proposed project would install water efficient irrigation systems and landscapes, as well as MICOrporate water reducing features n"r] f;vf,,rPQ intn the hllilrlings, RPcycling bins would . be provided in public areas throughout the project site. Due to the project site's location, existing public transportation options (bus service) are in proximity to the project site. The project site is served by LA Metro and Foothill Transit. Further, the project is in proximity to commercial centers that include restaurants, retail shops, and other service uses making it possible to walk to many daily needs, thereby reducing vehicle trips. As shown in Table 4.7 -1, operational - related BAU emissions would be 1,032.15 MTCO2eq /yr, which are below the 3,000 MTCO2eq /yr threshold. The proposed project's energy, transportation, water, and solid waste efficiency design features would further reduce project- related GHG emissions. Therefore, the proposed project would result in a less than significant impact with regard to GHG emissions. bi Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Determination: Less Than Significant Impact No applicable plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions apply to the Project area. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with an adopted plan, policy, or regulation pertaining to GHGs. Also, the proposed project would result in operational GHG emissions that are below the 3,000 MTCO2eq /yr threshold. The proposed project would also include design features to reduce emissions associated with vehicle trips, energy and water consumption, and solid waste. Thus, a less than significant impact would occur in this regard. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - Would the project; a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact ❑ ❑ R1 ❑ October 2014 Page 58 City of Baldwin Park TTM No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Would the project: b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one - quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis 0 1:1 2 n ❑ ® ❑ 21 ❑ ❑ ❑ Q ❑ ❑ Q ❑ City of Baldwin Park Page 59 October 2014 Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact ❑ ❑ 0 1:1 2 n ❑ ® ❑ 21 ❑ ❑ ❑ Q ❑ ❑ Q ❑ City of Baldwin Park Page 59 October 2014 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis TfM No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - Would the project: h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Less Than Significant Potentially', with Significant Mitigation Impact Incorporation ® ❑ Less Than Significant No Impact Impact A Limited Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase 1) was completed for the project site in March of 2008 by Cal Land Engineering, Inc. This assessment included a full records search, site assessment, and meetings with City of Baldwin Park staff in order to best understand the land use history of the project site. Would the project. a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Determination: Less Than Significant Impact The transport, use, and disposal of hazardous materials can result in the accidental release of chemicals that may present a risk to the public. The transport of materials is often directly related to the uses present within a development such as industrial and manufacturing operations. The proposed development includes residential uses, as well as improvements to an existing cellular facility. These uses do not include routine transport or use of hazardous materials. However, during the demolition and construction phases of the project, hazardous materials will be present due to the machinery used during these stages of the project (fuel, lubricants, solvents, etc...). Also, according to the Phase I, demolition may include the processing of materials containing asbestos that will need to be disposed of off -site. However, all work related to potential asbestos removal will be completed under the regulations set for by the California Department of Industrial Relations Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Cal /OSHA). While accidental discharge of hazardous materials is not possible, the operations related to the demolition, construction and operation of the proposed development do not present substantial risk. Impacts related to routine transport of hazardous materials will be less than significant. b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Determination: Less than Significant Refer to response 4.8(a) above. During the demolition and construction phases of the project, there is the possibility that hazardous materials may be released. However, due to the short - term of the demolition and construction of the project, the risk associated with release of hazardous chemicals is less than significant. During these phases, contractors would be subject to all construction regulations and safety procedures in order to reduce the risk of October 2014 Page 60 City of Baldwin Park TfIVI No. 72915 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration contamination to the greatest degree possible. In the event of a hazardous materials contamination, the containment and remediation of the incident would be subject to all local, state and federal regulations. With the implementation of all applicable construction safety standards and hazardous materials handling requirements, the impacts related to the release of hazardous materials are less than significant. c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one - quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? Determination: Less than Significant The proposed project is located approximately 0.19 mile from Kenmore Elementary School and other schools are located within a half -mile radius from the project site. Hazardous ate defined aq air tnxlnc relPacPyd frnm A wnriPty of nC)fPni-ial gnilr(- ciiujSinii� are often including but not limited to motor vehicles, dry cleaners, manufacturing plants and agricultural operations. Potential radiofrequency (RF) emissions from the wireless telecommunication facility would be considered to emit less than significant levels of RF emissions because the facility would be required to comply with all United States Federal Communication Commission's rules and regulations regarding RF emissions and equipment authorizations, which are intended to limit the maximum permissible exposure allowable to the general public from RF emissions. Potential emissions could occur at the project site due to the presence of machinery during the construction and demolition phases. Once constructed, the proposed project would consist of residential development, which would not emit hazardous materials. During the initial construction and demolition phases, the project would be required to comply with regulations set for by the California Environmental. Protection Agency. Compliance with these measures ensures the protection of air and water quality as well as soil contaminant levels. Through compliance with all applicable Cal /EPA laws throughout the demolition, construction and operation of the project impacts related to hazardous waste within close proximity to a school will be less than significant. d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? Determination: No Impact Government Code Section 65962.5 requires the enumeration of all sites that are currently under correction action for hazardous materials. According to a search of the Cal /EPA. Envirostar Database on September 17, 2014, the only listed site in close proximity to the project is the Baldwin. Park San Gabriel Valley Superfund Site, which is located approximately three - quarters of a mile northeast of the project site. However, this site will have no impact on the proposed project due to the distance from the project site. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Determination: No Impact The airport closest to the project sit is the E1 Monte Airport, which is located approximately 3.5 miles west of the project site. The airport is under the jurisdiction of the Los Angeles County Airport Land Use Commission. According to the Los Angeles County Airport Land City of Baldwin Park Page 61 October 2014 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis TTM No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration Use Plan El Monte Airport Map, the project site is not located within the El Monte Airport Influence area. Therefore, no impacts related to the airport land use compatibility would occur. f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Determination: No Impact According to the Federal Aviation Administration Airport Contacts Database, there are no private airstrips within the City of Baldwin Park. The project is also located beyond the boundary for the El Monte Airport Influence Area. Therefore, no impacts would occur. g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Determination: Less than Significant Impact The proposed project is not anticipated to result in significant impacts to emergency response or emergency evacuation plans. The project would be located on land that has already contained development that required emergency access. Future and recently approved development would be subject to all applicable ordinances including review by Police and Fire authorities prior to construction. As such, less than significant impacts would occur. h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Determination: Less than Significant Impact The project site is surrounded by existing development on all sides. The site is also located within an urban environment, with no major wildlands in the vicinity of the project site. However, the project will be required to meet all building and fire code requirements. A plan check as well as a building inspection conducted by City building officials would be required prior to occupancy of the development. As such, impacts associated with the wildland fires would be less than significant. Less Than HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Potentially Significant with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant -- Would the project.: Impact Incorporation Impact a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? No Impact October 2014 Page 62 City of Baldwin Park TTM No. 72915 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis Less Than " � _ ��- ` No the �� « � ^ l Incorporation Impact _ @ supplies Substantially or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would bem net deficit hn aquifer volume orm lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.8, the production rate of pre-exiabn5znearbv wells would drop tn u level which would not support existing land uses oz planned uses for which permits have been grant d)? d Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern m[the site mcarea, including through the alteration ofthe course oiu stream ozriver, inamanner which would result iusubstantial ecnai000zaUtationon- oroff-eite? 6\ Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site orarea, including through the alteration m6the course ofa stream oc river, oz substantially increase the rate ozamount uf surface runoff iou manner which vvou|dnsuoltinUoodingon- oroff-uite? e) Create m contribute runoff water which would exceed the capocib'cd ' [-7 existing or planned etormwruher drainage systems m provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? HO�euw�e water � ' - g) Place housing within a1 flood hazard area aa mapped unufederal Flood Hazard Boundary nrFlood Insurance Rate Map nr other flood hazard delineation map? Fol IN F:1 F:1 2 City of Baldwin Park Page 63 October 2014 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis TfM No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration Less Than HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Potentially Significant with Less Than No Significant Mitigation Significant -- Would the project: Impact Incorporation Impact Impact h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard . area structures which would impede or ❑ ❑ redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding El ❑ 1� r .i. c :i...,., ,.c ., r T. its a. result vt Lite tauuie vi a icvcc yr dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or ❑ u u mudflow? Would the Project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? Determination: Less than Significant Impact Water discharge from construction may consist of oil and grease, trash, heavy metals, pathogens as well as other potential pollutants. These potential discharges can be of concern . for projects as damage to water bodies can occur. Regulation of discharges into these waters is the responsibility of the State Water Resources Control Board kICIA RCB). During the demolition and grading phase of the project, potential runoff into the surrounding drainage system could cause sediment, oil, and other construction debris to contaminate the water. The SWRCB has adopted General Permit number CAS000002 -Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges of Storm Water Runoff Associated with Construction. Activity (General Permit). This permit applies to most construction - related runoff within the State. The General Permit requires that all grading permits for projects over one acre are required to submit a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that outlines best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on the project site to keep all sediment resulting from grading activities contained on the project site. The SWPPP for the proposed project would be submitted to the Regional Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Division. The implementation of the SWPPP would reduce the potential runoff associated with construction activities. Once constructed, the residential project site would be required to develop and comply with a Water Quality Management Plan in order to reduce potential runoff and erosion to the greatest degree possible on the project site. Through compliance with the SWPPP during the construction phases and a WQMP during the operational phases of the project, impacts will be less than significant. b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table October 2014 Page 64 City of Baldwin Park TTM No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis level (e.g., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? Determination: Less than Significant Impact The proposed project is located within the Valley County Water District (VCWD). The VCWD serves the Cities of Azusa, Duarte, Irwindale, West Covina, and Baldwin Park. According to the VCWD 2013 Water Master Plan, the District as of 2012 had a demand of 8,098 AFY and projects that demand will rise to 9,846 AFY by 2035 (p.4). The district gets water from a variety of sources including imported water from Covina Irrigation District, Main San Gabriel Basin Groundwater, and emergency water from the Upper San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District. According to the Water Master Plan, the VCWD anticipates that the district population will increase from 69,784 (2010) to 75,978 (2035). According to the California Department of Finance Table 2: E -5 City /County Population and Housing Estimates, 1/i/2014, average persons per household (pph) for the City of Baldwin Park is 4.42 pph. With the construction of 51 additional housing units, this would result in the addition of approximately 225 residents. According to the projected total population for the District by the year 2030, the addition of the 225 residents who would live in the proposed project would not increase water demand for the district to a level that the district could not meet with the current water distribution infrastructure. The proposed project would also require the installation of new impervious surfaces which could. increase runoff on the project site and may lead to a decrease in the amount of water recharged to the groundwater system within the project site. However, due to the small size of the project (3.6 acres) and the existing buildings that were constructed on the site, impacts will be less than significant. Therefore, impacts related to the depletion of groundwater supplies and the interference of groundwater recharge would be less than significant. c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? Determination: Less Than Significant Impact The proposed project site is generally flat and does not contain any substantial natural drainage features, such as a stream or river. Due to the existing development on the project site, runoff from the project is channeled from the site into drainage facilities located within the street. The project proposes the installation of new drainage and stormwater infrastructure that would catch any on -site runoff and feed into the in- street drainage infrastructure. In order to ensure that sediment does not enter the on- street system, an Erosion Control Plan will be required before the beginning of the construction of the project. Therefore, the disturbed nature of the project site and the use of on -site and off -site drainage infrastructure, impacts related to alteration of the existing drainage patterns would be less than significant. d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a City of Baldwin Park Page 65 October 2014 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis TTM No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration manner, which would result in flooding on or off -site? Determination: Less than Significant Impact As noted above, the project site contains existing development and is relatively flat. The project site does not contain any naturally occurring water features such as streams or rivers. The project would be required to develop a Water Quality Management Plan as well as a SWPPP prior to the beginning of construction. These measures would reduce the off- - site runoff associated with the proposed project. The project is also limited to a small footprint which will reduce the surface runoff generated by the project. As such, the project would have less than significant impacts related to flooding on and off site. e) Creat-e or contribute runoff water which would exceed the raparity of _existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Determination: Less Than Significant The proposed project includes the construction of several structures as well as the installation of increased areas of impervious surfaces. This construction would result in a negligible increase in stormwater runoff. The project also contains areas of pervious surface in order to facilitate infiltration of runoff in landscape areas. Due to the minimal runoff anticipated on the project site and the use of design elements to improve infiltration of water on site, substantial polluted runoff would not occur as a result of the project. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? Determination: Less Than Significant Refer to the responses provided in section 4.9(A) and 4,9(E) above. The proposed project would have less than significant impacts related to water quality. g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? Determination: No Impacts The proposed project is not located within a FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) 100 - Year Flood zone (See Fi,�ure 7, FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map). The project site is designated as Zone X, which is the designation for areas with outside of the 500 -year floodplain. As such, no impacts would occur. h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? Determination: No Impact Refer to response 4.9(G) above. The project is not located within a 100 -year floodplain. As such, the project would not place structures within the 100 -year floodplain. No impacts would occur. i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? Determination: Less than Significant As noted in response 4.9(H) above, the project is not located within the 100 or 500 year floodplains and as such flooding as a result of heavy storm flows resulting in loss, injury or death is of low risk. However, due to the seismic activity within the San Gabriel Valley, concerns related to potential damn and levee failure are a reality for the project site. October 2014 Page 66 City of Baldwin Park TTM No. 729I5 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis According W the Baldwin Park General Plan, Failure of the Santa Fe Dam could lead to flooding within the City which could reach o maximum of12-feet of water within the areas closest to the Dam. However, the project site is located south of the dam and therefore flood risk and severity are substantially lower (General Plan, P9-6). Although the risk oiflooding as u result of the failure of the Santa Fe Dam iopossible, the performance of the dam io past seismic events and the limited time that dam contains water throughout the year reduces this risk greatly (General Plan, PS-4). Therefore, impacts will be less than significant. j) Inundation 6ueeicAe, tsunami, m mudflow? No Impact The project site is located more than 20 miles from the nearest coastline. This greatly reduces i-'k,-puhonf;,q] fnr/mnnrfQolnfPatn nndhqiinnmi ThpCil-V C)fBq](JlVinPArk il, nnt included in the California Department of Conservation Loo Angeles County Tsunami Inundation Map. Continuing, the location of the project site several miles east o/the ocean reduces the risk ufinundation resulting from eeicbe. Due to the relatively flat topography and urban development inthe vicinity ufthe project site, inundation as a result ofouzdflnw is of low risk for the project site. Therefore, impacts would not occur. City of Baldwin Park Page 67 October 2014 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis 17M No. 72915 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK October 2014 Page 68 City of Baldwin Park Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis TTM No. 72915 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK October 2014 Page 70 City of Baldwin Park TIM No. 72915 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration �Iffi o � r ► b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general ® W, ❑ plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community ® ❑ ❑ Q conservation plan? Would the Project. a) Physically divide an established community? Detemination: Less Than Significant impact The project site is approximately 3.6 acres and contains existing development. The construction of the proposed project would require the demolition of the existing buildings and the construction of new, higher density residential structures as well as a mono - eucalyptus cellular antenna. The project would be an infill development for the community that would be surrounded by the urban development surrounding the project site. The development of the proposed project would not divide any of the existing established development. Therefore, no impacts would occur. b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Determination: Less than Significant Impact The proposed project is located in the city of Baldwin Park and is subject to compliance with current adopted plans, policies and regulations. The proposed project is subject to the most current amendments /approvals of the City General Plan, the Kerman Center Specific Plan, and the City Municipal Code (particularly the Zoning Ordinance). The Kerman Center Specific Plan states that "The Plan, as such, will allow the site to be developed in accordance with the City's adopted General Plan, Multi- Family Residential Design Guidelines and the City's Municipal Code" (P.2). As such, compliance with the Specific Plan will insure compliance with the above - mentioned regulations. City of Baldwin Park Page 71 October 2014 Less Than Significant' LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would Potentially ' with Less Than No Significant Mitigation Significant the project: Impact Incorporation Impact ' Impact a) Physically divide an established. ® ® Q community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general ® W, ❑ plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community ® ❑ ❑ Q conservation plan? Would the Project. a) Physically divide an established community? Detemination: Less Than Significant impact The project site is approximately 3.6 acres and contains existing development. The construction of the proposed project would require the demolition of the existing buildings and the construction of new, higher density residential structures as well as a mono - eucalyptus cellular antenna. The project would be an infill development for the community that would be surrounded by the urban development surrounding the project site. The development of the proposed project would not divide any of the existing established development. Therefore, no impacts would occur. b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Determination: Less than Significant Impact The proposed project is located in the city of Baldwin Park and is subject to compliance with current adopted plans, policies and regulations. The proposed project is subject to the most current amendments /approvals of the City General Plan, the Kerman Center Specific Plan, and the City Municipal Code (particularly the Zoning Ordinance). The Kerman Center Specific Plan states that "The Plan, as such, will allow the site to be developed in accordance with the City's adopted General Plan, Multi- Family Residential Design Guidelines and the City's Municipal Code" (P.2). As such, compliance with the Specific Plan will insure compliance with the above - mentioned regulations. City of Baldwin Park Page 71 October 2014 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis TTM No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration The current Kerman. Center Specific Plan calls for the construction of residential development, a private educational facility, wireless communications facilities and potentially limited commercial uses. The project proposes to construct residential units (townhomes) as well as improvements to, and relocation of, the existing wireless facility. The Specific Plan allows for the construction of dwelling units at a maximum density of 16.2 units per acre. The proposed development would be built at a density of approximately 14.1 units per acre. As such, impacts resulting from the proposed project would be less than significant. In order to construct solely residential units, as opposed to the mix of residential and educational /commercial uses, and to include Assessor Parcel Number 8552 -01.7 -004 into the proposed. Specific Plan boundary, the project will require an amendment to the specific plan and a change of zone. However, the Specific Plan amendment, zone change and subsequent construction of residential units and wireless communication facilities would not increase the potential environmental impacts associated with the project site. As such, less than significant impacts would occur. c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Determination: No Impact The City of Baldwin Park does not have any adopted habitat conservation or natural community conservation plans. However, the County of Los Angeles does have the Significant Ecological Areas Program. The closest Significant Ecological Area is located in the City of Irwindale and is approximately 2.5 miles north of the project site. Therefore, no impacts would occur. 4.11 MINERAL RESOURCES Less Than Significant MINERAL RESOURCES -- Would the Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No project: Impact Incorporation Impact Impact a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local ❑ general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Q ❑ ❑ Q October 2014 Page 72 City of Baldwin Park TTM No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis Would the Project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? Determination: Less Than Significant The State Mining and Geology Board (SMGB) establishes Mineral Resources Zones (MRZs) to designate lands that contain mineral deposits. The classifications used by the State to define MRZs are as follows: • MRZ -1: Areas where the available geologic information indicates no significant likelihood of significant mineral deposits. • MRZ -2a: Areas where the available geologic information indicates that there are significant mineral deposits. v v • MRZ -2b: Areas where the available geologic information indicates that there is a likelihood of significant mineral deposits. • MRZ -3a: Areas where the available geologic information indicates that mineral deposits exist. However, the significance of the deposit is undetermined. • MRZ -3b: Areas where the available geologic information indicates that mineral deposits are likely to exist. However, the significance of the deposit is undetermined. ■ MRZ -4: Areas where there is not enough information available to determine the presence or absence of mineral deposits. As stated in the City of Baldwin Park General Plan. Final. Program EIR, since 1882, all of Baldwin Park has been designated by the State Geologist as a Mineral Resource Zone 2 (MRZ -2) where "adequate information indicates that significant mineral deposits are present or where it is judged that a high likelihood for their presence exists." This designation also applies to substantial acreage throughout the adjacent cities of Azusa and Irwindale, where active surface mining operations are present. Such areas contain aggregate resources, commonly known as gravel, which is considered to be an important construction material; however, as the City of Baldwin Park is nearing buildout, the areas containing significant mineral resources are largely developed. As stated above, a significant impact on mineral resources would occur if a project were to result in a loss of availability of a known mineral resource of value to the region or the State. Implementation of the proposed project may therefore have the potential to impact mineral resources, due to the MRZ -2 classification. As stated in the General Plan Final Program EIR, "given the MRZ -2 designation and the active extraction activities in surrounding areas, it is highly likely that mineral resources exist in the City of Baldwin Park." However, the EIR also states that "the City is largely built out with urban uses that are incompatible with mineral extraction and /or surface mining activities." Additionally, current General Plan policy does not provide for mining activities to occur within the City. The General Plan Final Program EIR indicates that because mining use is not required by any applicable State law or local ordinance, and because in a regional context, potential mineral resources in the City are limited in extent and are largely inaccessible due to urbanization, impacts on City of Baldwin Park Page 73 October 2014 Section 4.O Environmental Analysis TrIVI No. 729l5 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration aggregate resources are not considered to be significant. The proposed project would be required to comply with applicable State and local regulations relative to mineral resources, as applicable to development of the subject site. However, due to the above reasons, project impacts on mineral resources are considered to be |eaa than significant, and no mitigation measures are required. h) Result in the loss of availability nfxlocally /xnpurb/xt nn/xono/ resource recovery site delineated on o local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Determination: Less Than Significant Refer to Response 4.11(a), above. Due to existing conditions onshr and within the City of Baldwin Park, the proposed project would not result inthe loss of availability of a locally oru�soerul zeoo�/:e recovery site de|oeated onUzc �an�ra|Plan, Spe�6c Plan, or inzntud other land use plan. Impacts would he less than significant, aodnonidgubonmeuauruaaue required. 4.12 NOISE Less Than � ' Potentially ` Significant Mitigation Significant � No NOISE .— Would result in: ''`� Impact a) a) of persons tom generation of noise levels in excess ufstamdar(ie established in the local general plan o, noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? f) ��` cd persons hnor ~ of excessive BTonndborne vibration or gzono dborne noise levels? o)/1aobatuodoJpezonanen�iuo/eueein ' ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d)A substantial temporary orperiodic increase oo ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? October 2014 Page 74 City of Baldwin Park Trm No. 72915 Initial Study /mitigated Negative Declaration Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No NOISE — Would the t j roec result in: act � Impact Incorporation Impact Impact . p e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would ❑ ❑ ❑ the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project u area to excessive noise levels? Would the Project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Determination: Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. SHORT- TERM CONSTRUCTION Construction of the proposed project would occur over approximately eight months8 and would include site preparation, grading, paving, construction of single family homes, and the application of architectural coatings. Ground -borne noise and other types of construction - related noise impacts would typically occur during excavation activities of the grading phase. This phase of construction has the potential to create the highest levels of noise. Typical noise levels generated by construction equipment are shown in Table 4.12 -1, Maximum Noise Levels Generated by Construction Equipment. It should be noted that the noise levels identified in Table 4.12 -1 are maximum sound levels (Lmax), which are the highest individual sound occurring at an individual time period. Operating cycles for these types of construction equipment may involve one or two minutes of full power operation followed by three to four minutes at lower power settings. Other primary sources of acoustical disturbance would be due to random incidents, which would last less than one minute (such as dropping large pieces of equipment or the hydraulic movement of machinery lifts). 8 Eight months is considered a typical duration for residential construction of this nature. However, the project is considered as market driven and would most likely be a phased development with periodic construction timing. City of Baldwin Park Page 75 October 2014 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis TTM No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration Tahle 4.12 -1 - Maximum Noise Levels Generated by Construction Equipment Type of E qi orient Acoustical Use Factory Lax at0 ;Feef (dBA} Concrete Saw 20 90 Crane 16 81 Concrete Mixer Truck 40 79 Backhoe 40 78 Dozer 40 82 Excavator 40 81 Forklift 40 78 Paver 50 77 Pile Driver (impact) 20 101 Pile Driver sonic 20 96 Roller 2n 8n Tractor 40 84 Water Truck 40 80 Grader 40 85 General Industrial Equipment 50 85 Note: 1 Acoustical Use Factor (percent): Estimates the fraction of time each piece of construction equipment is operating at full power (i.e., its loudest condition ) during a construction operation. Source: Federal Highway Administration, Roadway Construction Noise Model (FHWA- HEP -05 -054 ), January 2006. It is anticipated that construction activities would occur between the hours of 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM, Monday through Saturday, and are less likely to occur on Sundays and holidays. Additionally, all construction activities would be required to comply with the current City's General Plan, noise ordinance and applicable state and federal regulations. Construction would occur throughout the project site and would not be concentrated or confined in the area directly adjacent to sensitive receptors. It should be noted that the noise levels depicted in Table 4.12 -1 are maximum noise levels, which would occur sporadically when construction equipment is operated in proximity to sensitive receptors. Given the sporadic and variable nature of proposed project construction and the implementation of noise limits specified in the Municipal Code, noise impacts would be reduced to a less than significant level. Additionally, to further reduce the potential for noise impacts, Mitigation Measure N0I -1 would be implemented to incorporate best management practices during construction. Implementation of Mitigation Measure N0I -1 would further minimize impacts from construction noise as it requires construction equipment to be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers and other state required noise attenuation devices. Thus, with mitigation, a less than significant noise impact would result from construction activities. LONG -TERM OPERATIONAL IMPACTS Off -Site Mobile Noise Implementation of the proposed project would result in additional. traffic on adjacent roadways, thereby increasing vehicular noise in the vicinity of existing and proposed land uses. This increase in daily trips (436) distributed throughout local streets would be nominal compared to the allowed traffic volume therefore, traffic noise associated with the proposed project on off -site roadways would be minimal. The amount of trips associated October 2014 Page 76 City of Baldwin Park TFM No. 72915 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration with the proposed project would not be expected to increase noise levels in exceedance of City Noise Standards, and future residents of the project site would not be exposed to excessive traffic noise levels. Therefore, a less than significant impact would occur in this regard. CUMULATIVE MOBILE SOURCE IMPACTS As described above, operational traffic noise impacts from the project would be minimal . due to the amount of trips (436 ADT). Therefore, the increase in noise associated with cumulative traffic would not be cumulatively considerable and is less than significant. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in long -term mobile noise impacts based on project generated traffic as well as cumulative and incremental noise 'levels. Therefore, the proposed project, in combination with cumulative background traffic noise levels, would result in a less than significant cumulative impact in this regard. ON -SITE MOBILE NOISE The proposed project includes 51 single family residential units. The project site is located in a mostly developed residential and commercial area. Further, the project would generate 436 daily trips, and would be similar to the noise environment similar in the existing area (residential /commercial). Therefore, on -site traffic noise would not generate substantial noise levels in exceedance of City Standards, and a less than significant impact would occur. STATIONARY NOISE IMPACTS The project proposes 51 residential dwelling units and a wireless communication facility. Noise that is typical of residential areas includes children playing, pets, amplified music, mechanical equipment, car repair, and home repair. Noise from residential stationary sources would primarily occur during the "daytime" activity hours. The wireless facility components would be contained within an enclosure to reduce noise levels should the need for power generation to service the facility occur. Noise impacts to surrounding uses associated with implementation of the proposed project are anticipated to be less than significant. MITIGATION MEASURES: N0I -1 Prior to Grading Permit issuance, the Project Applicant shall demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the Baldwin Park Public Works Department that the project complies with the following: ■ Construction contracts specify that all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers and other state required noise attenuation devices. ■ Property owners and occupants located within 250 feet of the project boundary shall be sent a notice, at least 15 days prior to commencement of construction of each phase, regarding the construction schedule of the proposed project. A sign, legible at a distance of approximately 50 feet City of Baldwin Park Page 77 October 2014 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis TfM No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration shall be posted at the project construction site. All notices and signs shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Baldwin Park Planning Department, prior to mailing or posting and shall indicate the dates and duration of construction activities, as well as provide a contact name and a telephone number where residents can inquire about the construction process and register complaints. ■ The Contractor shall provide evidence that a construction staff member will be designated as a Noise Disturbance Coordinator and will be present on -site during all construction activities. The Noise Disturbance Coordinator shall be responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise. When a complaint is received, the Noise Disturbance Coordinator shall notify the City within 24 -hours of the complaint and determine the cause of the noise complaint (e.g., starting too early, bad muffler, etc.) and shall implement reasonable measures to resolve the complaint, as deemed acceptable by the Public Works Department. All notices that are sent to residential units immediately surrounding the construction site and all signs posted at the construction site shall include the contact name and the telephone number for the Noise Disturbance Coordinator. • Construction noise reduction methods shall be used where feasible. These reduction methods include shutting off idling equipment, installing temporary acoustic barriers around stationary construction noise sources, maximizing the distance between construction equipment staging areas and occupied residential areas, and electric air compressors and similar power tools. • Construction haul routes shall be designed to avoid noise sensitive uses (e.g., residences, convalescent homes, schools, churches, etc.), to the extent feasible. • During construction, stationary construction equipment shall be placed such that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive noise receptors. b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Determination: Less Than Significant Impact. Project construction can generate varying degrees of groundborne vibration, depending on the construction procedure and the construction equipment used. Operation of construction equipment generates vibrations that spread through the ground and diminish in amplitude with distance from the source. The effect on buildings located in the vicinity of the construction site often varies depending on soil type, ground strata, and construction characteristics of the receiver building(s). The results from vibration can range from no perceptible effects at the lowest vibration levels, to low rumbling sounds and perceptible October 2014 Page 78 City of Baldwin Park TTM No. 72915 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration vibration at moderate levels, to slight damage at the highest levels. Groundborne vibrations from construction activities rarely reach levels that damage structures. Building damage can be cosmetic or structural. Ordinary buildings that are not particularly fragile would not experience any cosmetic damage (e.g., plaster cracks) at distances beyond 30 feet. This distance can vary substantially depending on the soil composition and underground geological layer between vibration source and receiver. In addition, not all buildings respond similarly to vibration generated by construction equipment. For example, for a building that is constructed with reinforced concrete with no plaster, the Federal Transit Administration's (FTA) guidelines show that a vibration level of up to 0.50 inch per second. (in /sec) (102 velocity decibels [VdB]) is considered safe and would not result in any construction vibration damage. The vibration produced by construction equipment is illustrated in Table 4.12 -2, Typical Vibration Levels -for Construction Equipment. Table 4.12 -2: T °• "iial vibrativi� Levels tor �ar�s$ructi ®n E_ �;�erl �imate peak Approximate peak Approximate peak > Approxim6te peak uiprrtent' particl e eloc(ty at particle vetcity aipartieleveloclty at ' particleelbcityt 25 fee W feet 75 feet Ii30,feet {incheslsecond ! ; ches bnd } i che1, con, i} ond)� Large bulldozer 0.089 0.031 0.017 0.011 Loaded trucks 0.076 0.027 0.015 0.010 Small bulldozer 0.003 0.001 0.001 0.000 Notes: 1 Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Guidelines, May 2006. Table 12 -2. 2 Calculated using the following formula: PPV equip = PPVrerx (25 /D)' $ where: PPV (equip) = the peak particle velocity in in /sec of the equipment adjusted for the distance I PPV (ref) = the reference vibration level in in /sec from Table 12 -2 of the FTA Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Guidelines D = the distance from the equipment to the receiver Groundborne vibration decreases rapidly with distance. As indicated in Table 4.12 -2, based on the FTA data, vibration velocities from typical heavy construction equipment operation that would be used during project construction range from 0.003 to 0.089 in /sec peak particle velocity (PPV) at 25 feet from the source of activity. With regard to the proposed project, groundborne vibration would be generated primarily during grading activities on -site and by off -site haul -truck travel (if any). Because the project area is relatively flat, grading activities are considered to be minimal and short in duration. Therefore, vibration impacts would be less than significant. LONG -TERM OPERATIONAL IMPACTS The project proposes 51 single family residential units that would not generate ground - borne vibration that could be felt at surrounding uses. The wireless facility components would be contained within an enclosure to reduce operational noise levels from power generation to serve the facility. The wireless facility power generation is not anticipated to generate significant groundborne vibration. Any trucks visiting the site to service the wireless facility would be periodic and primarily during daytime hours. The proposed . project would not involve railroads or substantial heavy truck operations, and therefore City of Baldwin Park Page 79 October 2014 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis TTM No. 7291.5 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration would not result in vibration impacts at surrounding uses. No impact would occur in this regard. c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Determination: Less Than Significant Impact. Refer to Response 4.12(a). Less than significant impacts would occur in this regard. d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Determination: Less Than Significant Impact. Refer to Response 4.12(a). Less than significant impacts would occur in this regard. e) For a project located within an airport Lana use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Determination: No Impact. The proposed Project is not located within an airport land use plan. There is no public airport, public use airport, or private airstrip located within two miles of the Project site. Therefore, no impacts would occur in this regard. f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Determination: No Impact. Refer to Response 4.12(e). No impacts would occur in this regard. 4.13 POPULATION AND HOUSING POPULATION AND HOUSING -- Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? ❑ ❑ 1:1 ❑ ❑ October 2014 Page 80 City of Baldwin Park Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact ❑ ❑ R1 ❑ ❑ 1:1 ❑ ❑ October 2014 Page 80 City of Baldwin Park TTM No. 72915 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration Would the Project. a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. According to the California Department of Finance City /County Population and Housing Estimates (1/1./2014), the persons per household (pph) is stated to be 4.42 pph for the City of Baldwin Park. The stated population by the Department of Finance is 76,715 for the City. The project proposes 51 additional townhome dwelling units, which could result in a population increase of approximately 225 persons. The project could result in an increase in th- (-''4- '� v�nr�«�� +inn n� ar<r<rnvim ai-P�<r (1 d.0% An711iP11 is not (-nn Ci(1PrP(i gianifirnnt Thi. e �i o rvt,u<u.. —, v� ut.i..�v..,..,...,.,. .y ... �.., ... _.. -- .. , e..,�..._.._�_�..,. 'b_ proposed Project is located in an infill area within the City that has existing utility services available. The Project would induce population growth, but not above the City's General Plan estimated year 2020 buildout projection of 841885 persons. Therefore, the proposed Project would not induce population growth above that which is already approved and planned for by the City. As a result, less than significant impacts would result. b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Determination: No Impact. The Project will construct fifty one (51) new housing units. The existing five (5) vacant residences will be demolished and replaced with forty six (46) new housing opportunities. Implementation of the proposed project would not displace substantial numbers of existing 1 +l la e + + +r,o construction of replacement housing. Because the protect iiviising + ,as would n cessItate the site is vacant, no housing would be displaced as a result of project implementation, and therefore, no impacts would occur. c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Determination: No Impact. Refer to Response 4.1.3 (b), above. There are no persons living on -site under existing conditions. No impacts would occur in this regard. City of Baldwin Park Page 81 October 2014 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis TTM No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration 4.14 PUBLIC SERVICES Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No PUBLIC SERVICES Impact Incorporation Impact Impact a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or Pl Lyblt:Qlly QILVIV A 6VVC11[11.1elLlQ1 tat.utuc D, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to -maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? ❑ ❑ Q ❑ Police protection? ❑ ❑ Q Schools? ❑ ❑ ❑ Parks? ❑ ❑ ❑ Other public facilities? ❑ �Qr LJ El Would the Project: a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: 1) Fire protection? Determination: Less Than Significant Impact. Baldwin Park is contracted with the Los Angeles County Fire Department for fire protection /emergency services. The East Regional Operations Bureau serves Baldwin. Park and reports to the Chief Deputy of Emergency Operations, and includes Division 2, 4, 8, and 9, representing 76 fire stations serving communities within the east side of Los Angeles County, with Division 2 serving Baldwin Park. The nearest fire station is the County Fire Station #29, located at 14334 E Los Angeles Street and is approximately 1.22 miles from the Project site. The development of 51 new residential units would induce population growth, as identified in Response 4.13(a). The new development would replace structures that were built prior to more current /improved fire code requirements and technologies, making a safer household and community for future occupants. It is not anticipated that the Project October 2014 Page 82 City of Baldwin Park TrM No. 72915 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis Initial St dy/N1hb ted Negative Declaration would result io the need for additional new or altered fire services and the project wouldnotalter acceptable service ratios orresponse times, because of the in8l| nature of the project. It is not anticipated that implementation of the Project would create the need for the development of additional fire facilities. The Fire Department will have an opportunity to review the Project during the application process and development impact fees vviUbe determined that will be paid by the applicant, which will contribute to the provision for future facilities as the City's population increases (if determined necessary). Therefore, 1eea than significant impacts to fire protection services would occur with implementation of the proposed 2) Police protection? Determination: Less Than Significant Impact. The City's Police Station is located u114403 Pacific Avenue and is approximately 09 ozUe from the Project site. The proposed Project vvoo]d construct 51 nzaidcnda| dwelling units that could induce population growth, as identified in Response 4.13(a). The Project would not result bn the need for additional new or altered police protection services and would not alter acceptable service ratios or response thnoo because of existing services and the infiU nabzoc of the project. It is not anticipated that implementation of the Project would create the need for the development of additional police facilities, as the Police Department will have an opportunity to review the Project doziogduupplicudon9zoceoe and development impact fees will be determined that will be paid by the applicant, which will contribute to the provision for future facilities as the [dv'a population increases 'i[ determined necessary). Therefore, less than significant impacts to police protection services would occur with implementation of the proposed Pr ject. 3) Schools? Less Than Significant Impact. The development of 51 single family dwelling units could induce population growth, ue identified in Response 4.l3(u). The Project would add additiona students to the Baldwin Park Unified School District. The School District currently has 13 elementary adzoo1a, 4 middle/junior high schools, and 3 high schools within the District boundaries. The Project area is served by the boUovviuB schools: Kenmore Elementary School, Sierra Vista Jr. High/Middle School and Sierra Vista High School. Impacts to adzoo|a will be mitigated by mandatory school impact fees that will be paid by the applicant. Therefore, impacts are considered less than significant. 4) Parks? Determination: Less Than Significant Impact. The City of Baldwin Park has five (5) parks within the City, which includes Barnes Park, Hilda L. Solis Park, Morgan Park, Svhr Park, and Walnut Creek Nature Park. Two uf the five parks are within u relatively close proximity ho the project ake,vvhicb includes Morgan Park and Hilda L. Solis Park. Morgan Park is approximately 0.6I noUe from the project site and amenities at Morgan Park include u playground, splash pad, picnic shelters, soccer field, outdoor amphitheater, bmrbeques, reatzuozns, horseshoes and supervised recreation. Hilda L. Solis Park is uppzoxbnubs|y 1.52 City of Baldwin Park Page 83 October 2014 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis TfM No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration miles from the project site and amenities include a playground, outdoor fitness zone, picnic shelters, basketball courts, soccer field, barbeques, restrooms, and supervised recreation. The proposed Project would not induce significant population growth, as identified in Response 4.13(a). The project proposes a passive park facility within the residential development, with amenities that include an outdoor barbeque and seating area. It is anticipated that he Project would not result in the need for new or expanded parks or park facilities because of the relatively small population increase that the project would generate. The Quimby Act (California Government Code Section 66477), originally passed in 1975, allows cities and counties to pass ordinances requiring that developers set aside land, donate conservation easements, or pay fees for park improvements, which would mitigate impacts to parks with implementation of the proposed Project. Therefore, park impacts are considered less than significant. 5) Other public facilities? Determination: Less Than Significant Impact. The Baldwin Park library is located at 4181 Baldwin Park Boulevard and is approximately 0.75 mile northeast of the Project site. The project would add residents that would potentially use library services. Impacts to library services are mitigated through income generated through property tax payments and development impact fees, which. Project implementation would contribute to. Thus, impacts are considered less than significant. 4.15 RECREATION RECREATION -- Potentially Significant Impact a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such El that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which ❑ might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Less Than Significant with Less Than Mitigation Significant No Incorporation Impact Impact ❑ R1 ❑ ® Q ❑ October 2014 Page 84 City of Baldwin Park TTM No. 3915 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration a) Would the proposed project increase the use nFexisting neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility mould occur or be accelerated? Determination: Less Than Significant ln/nuct As stated above in Response 4]4(u4) above, the City of Baldwin Park has five (5) parks within the City, which includes Barnes Park, Hilda L.Solis Park, Morgan Park, Syhre8ark, and Walnut Creek Nature Park. Two of these parks, Morgan Park and Hilda L. Solis Park are located within u relatively close proximity to the project site. Amenities at Morgan Park include a playground, opluab pad, picnic shelters, soccer field, outdoor amphitheater, barbeqnee, reabrooms, horseshoes, and supervised recreation. Amenities at Hilda L. Solis Park include u9luyground, outdoor fitness zone, picnic shelters, basketball courts, soccer field, bucbequea, reebouma, and supervised recreation.. Additionally, City residents have access toapproximately 169 acresofjoint-oee school playground facilities, as we'll as access to County regional parks within and near the City. The Santa Fe Dam Regional Park consists of approximately 835 acres of open space, and the Whittier Narrows Regional Park and Nature Center consists of approximately l,O92 acres ot park space. As indicated in the General Y]uo Final Program BDR, City-owned parks and recreational facilities currently provide a ratio of approximately 0.4 acres of parkland per 1,000 City residents. This ratio of parkland to population is auhahmbu||v below the 3 to 5 acres per 1,000 people standard established by many communities, and is further supported by the Subdivision Map Act. Available regional park resources and playground facilities help to compensate for the lack of parkland within the City of Baldwin to some extent. However, such unocuitiea are not ukvayo conveniently located within proximity to residential neighborhoods, nor do all City park facilities accommodate specific community needs. The General Plan Final Program BDl indicates that with buUdont of the General Plan, impacts onthe City's recreational resources would be significant and unavoidable, in part due to the largely urbanized nature ufthe City and the lack ofavailable lands to create new parks or recreational facilities that vvon|d meet bztoze demands. Bon9basia is therefore placed on enhancing existing parks, creating new mini-parks, and expanding joint-use agreements with local schools, as well as preserving existing facilities and recreational programs. InznLezneoLadon of the parks and recreation-related policies identified in the Open Space and Conservation Element of the General Plan would reduce some of the anticipated burden on existing parks and may provide additional park and recreation opportunities for the City's residents. However, given the extent ofthe current deficiency in parkland and other recreation facilities, utilization of available parka and facilities is anticipated to intensify substantially. Additionally, as there is no assurance that inup&nueotudon of the proposed General Iqun policies would result in sufficient additional park and recreation facilities to accommodate the increase in population, no feasible measures in addition to the General Plan policies are available to fully mitigate He significant impacts. The proposed project would not induce substantial population growth, as identified in Response 4.13(u) above, and would not exceed the planned future growth anticipated with boildoot of the General Plan. The addition of 225 persons utilizing the City's existing City of Baldwin Park Page 85 October 2014 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis TTM No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration park /recreational facilities would not cause substantial physical deterioration or accelerate the deterioration of existing recreational facilities, as such an increase in population is considered to be a relatively small quantity relative to the City's overall population. Additionally, as stated above, the project proposes a passive park facility within the residential development, offering such amenities as an outdoor barbeque and seating area, that would reduce potential project- related demands for recreational resources within the City. Due to the low number of new residents that the project would generate, it is not anticipated that the development would result in the need for new or expanded parks or park facilities within the City. The Quimby Act (California Government Code Section 66477), as referenced above in Response 4.14(a4), allows cities and counties to pass ordinances requiring developers to set aside 'Land, donate conservation easements, and /or pay fees for park improvements. Such means would be used to mitigate potential impacts to parks with implementation of the proposed project. Therefore, project impacts with regard to recreation are considered to be less than significant, and no mitigation measures are required. b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse effect on the environment? Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Refer to Responses 4.14 (a4) and 4.15(a), above. The proposed project will add 51 residential . dwelling units that may potentially add 225 persons to the City's population. It is not anticipated that implementation of the proposed project would require the construction or expansion of offsite recreational facilities because of its relatively limited size. As the site is currently developed and /or highly disturbed, development of the proposed onsite recreational park within the existing setting is not anticipated to result in adverse environmental effects. Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures are required. October 2014 Page 86 City of Baldwin Park TfM No. 72915 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration '• The following section draws on the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) conducted by TJW Engineering for the proposed project; the report is included in the appendices of this document. The initial TIA was written in November of 2013 and was updated in August of 2014. A total of five study intersections were examined in order to quantify the traffic impacts that may result from the development of the proposed project. The intersections studied in the TIA were: 1. Merced Ave /Ramona. Blvd 2. Baldwin Park Blvd/Ramona Blvd City of Baldwin Park Page 87 October 2014 Less Than TRANSPORTATION /TRAFFIC -- Would the Potentially Significant Less Than' Significant with Mitigation Significant No project: Impact Incorporation Impact Impact a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non - motorized travel ❑ R1 El and re1CVQALL components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to, level -of- service standards and travel demand ® Q measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads and highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a i Li change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous ® ® Q El intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ❑ f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation ❑ ❑ Q ❑ (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? The following section draws on the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) conducted by TJW Engineering for the proposed project; the report is included in the appendices of this document. The initial TIA was written in November of 2013 and was updated in August of 2014. A total of five study intersections were examined in order to quantify the traffic impacts that may result from the development of the proposed project. The intersections studied in the TIA were: 1. Merced Ave /Ramona. Blvd 2. Baldwin Park Blvd/Ramona Blvd City of Baldwin Park Page 87 October 2014 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis TTM No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration 3. Baldwin Park Blvd/Merced Ave 4. Baldwin Park Blvd /Foster Ave 5. Vineland Ave/Merced Ave The streets surrounding the project site vary in capacity and existing infrastructure, ranging from two -lane undivided roadways (Foster Ave and Vineland Ave) to four -lane divided roadways (Ramona Blvd, Merced Ave, and Baldwin Park Blvd). All roads have existing sidewalks with the exception of the northern side of Ramona Avenue, and there are Class II bicycle lanes on Ramona Avenue only. Public bus transit is provided by both LA Metro and Foothill Transit. Multiple stops for both transit agencies are located within close proximity to the project site. Peak hour traffic counts conducted for the project recorded existing LOS for the study intersections ranging from LOS A to LOS B. Table 4.16 -1 below shows the recorded existing LOS for each of the intersections. Table 4.16 -t Fxistinn LOS Conditions Signalized Intersections (VIC - LOS) Merced Ave /Ramona Blvd 0.469 -A 0.527 -A Baldwin Park Blvd /Ramona Blvd 0.531 -A 0.653 -13 Baldwin Park Blvd /Merced Ave 0.571 -A 0.578 -A Baldwin Park Blvd /Foster Ave 0.487 -A 0.359 -A Vineland Ave /Merced Ave 0.545 -A 0.425 -A Note: V /C- Volume to Capacity (Delay Shown in Seconds) Source: TJW Engineering Inc. TTM 721 1,15 Project Traffic impact Analysis (August 2014 For a full description of the existing conditions, refer to the attached Traffic Impact Analysis located in Appendix 3 of this report. Would the Project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non - motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? Determination: Less Than Significant Impact As noted in the existing conditions described above, the existing LOS for the intersections surrounding the project site range from LOS A to LOS B. However, it is anticipated that as Baldwin Park continues to grow and new development occurs within the City, the LOS of these intersections will be impacted. According to the City of Baldwin Park General Plan, the City identifies a peak hour target of LOS D or better. According to the Traffic Impact Analysis conducted for this project, the proposed development would add 35 AM Peak Hour trips, 46 PM Peak Hour trips, and 436 daily trips. These trips would be disbursed throughout the streets surrounding the project site. October 2014 Page 88 City of Baldwin Park TTM No. 72915 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration LOS Forecast Year 2030 with Conditions Note: V /C- Volume to Capacity (Delay Shown in Seconds) Source: TJW Engineering Inc. TTM 72195 Project Traffic Impact Analysis (August 2014) The Traffic Impact Analysis uses these increased trips to project future roadway conditions, both for the project opening year (2015) and for a long -term forecast year (2030). These projections include LOS projections both with the proposed project and without the proposed project. According to the Traffic Impact Analysis, the increased trips generated by the project would result in less than significant impacts for both the project opening year (2015) and for the forecast year (2030). All intersections would operate at a Level of Service of C or better, as shown above in Table 4.16-3, Intersection Analysis - Forecast Year 2030 With Project Conditions. According to the above - mentioned threshold of a LOS D, the proposed project would not create impacts that would result in a LOS E or F. As stated in the existing conditions summary above, the roadways contain sidewalks and limited bike facilities as well as transit stops in the vicinity of the project site. None of these facilities would be removed or altered by the development of the project site, with the exception of the reconfiguration of driveway access to the project site. Any changes to the sidewalk made during the construction of driveways for the project site would be in accordance with City code and would be subject to plan check prior to construction. As such, impacts to the circulation system would not significantly alter the existing conditions, and no conflicts with applicable policies, ordinances, or plans would occur. b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to, level -of- service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? Determination: No Impact According to the Baldwin Park General Plan, the City of Baldwin Park does not have a Congestion. Management Plan, however the City is subject to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Congestion Management Program. The program evaluates all projects that meet the following criteria: City of Baldwin Park Page 89 October 2014 Si nalized Intersections (V /C - LOS) Merced Ave /Ramona Blvd 0.524 - A 1 0.590 - A 0.526-A 0.003 0.591 -A 0.001 No Baldwin Park Blvd /Ramona Blvd 0.599 - A 0.729 - C 0.600 - A 0.001 0.738 - C 0.009 No Baldwin Park Blvd /Merced Ave 0.642 - B 0.649 - B 0.641 - B U.UUS U.652 - B 0.003 No Baldwin Park Blvd /Foster Ave 0.544 - A 0.397 - A 0.547 -A 0.003 0.399 - A 0.002 I No Vineland Ave /Merced Ave 0.661 - B 0.470 - A 0.612 - B 0.001 0.473 - A 0.003 No Note: V /C- Volume to Capacity (Delay Shown in Seconds) Source: TJW Engineering Inc. TTM 72195 Project Traffic Impact Analysis (August 2014) The Traffic Impact Analysis uses these increased trips to project future roadway conditions, both for the project opening year (2015) and for a long -term forecast year (2030). These projections include LOS projections both with the proposed project and without the proposed project. According to the Traffic Impact Analysis, the increased trips generated by the project would result in less than significant impacts for both the project opening year (2015) and for the forecast year (2030). All intersections would operate at a Level of Service of C or better, as shown above in Table 4.16-3, Intersection Analysis - Forecast Year 2030 With Project Conditions. According to the above - mentioned threshold of a LOS D, the proposed project would not create impacts that would result in a LOS E or F. As stated in the existing conditions summary above, the roadways contain sidewalks and limited bike facilities as well as transit stops in the vicinity of the project site. None of these facilities would be removed or altered by the development of the project site, with the exception of the reconfiguration of driveway access to the project site. Any changes to the sidewalk made during the construction of driveways for the project site would be in accordance with City code and would be subject to plan check prior to construction. As such, impacts to the circulation system would not significantly alter the existing conditions, and no conflicts with applicable policies, ordinances, or plans would occur. b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to, level -of- service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? Determination: No Impact According to the Baldwin Park General Plan, the City of Baldwin Park does not have a Congestion. Management Plan, however the City is subject to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Congestion Management Program. The program evaluates all projects that meet the following criteria: City of Baldwin Park Page 89 October 2014 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis TFIVI No. 72915 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration ■ All CMP arterial monitoring intersections, including monitored freeway on or off- ramp intersections, where the proposed project will add 50 or more trips during either the AM or PM weekday peak hours (of adjacent street traffic). ■ Mainline freeway monitoring locations where the project will add 150 or more trips, in either direction, during either the AM or PM weekday peak hours. The proposed project does not meet either of the criteria, and is not subject to the County Congestion Management Program. As such, the proposed project will have a no impact on any congestion management program. c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? Determination: No Impact The proposed project would not result in a change in air traffic patterns or a change in location resulting in safety risks. The nearest airport is the E! Monte Airport, which is located 3.5 miles from the project site. The proposed project is not located within any airport compatibility zones. The project also proposes single-family residential, and telecommunications equipment, both which are subject to height restrictions within the City. Therefore, the project will have no impact on air traffic and will not create a substantial safety risk. d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Determination: Less than Significant Impact The proposed project does not propose any street alignment changes or roadway improvements. Driveways will be added in order to enter the development; however they will be in accordance with City regulations. The construction of the project would not result in incompatible uses. The development would include residential units as well the cellular antenna, both of which are consistent with the Kerman Center Specific Plan. Therefore, impacts related to potential hazards or incompatible uses as a result of the project would be less than significant. e) Result in inadequate emergency access? Determination: Less than Significant The proposed project is located on Merced Ave, Baldwin Park Blvd and Kenmore Ave. Vehicular access would be provided on both Merced Ave and Kenmore Ave. Prior to construction, the project in its entirety would be subject to review by Fire and Police officials, With incorporation of comments made by the City, impacts associated with the proposed project would be less than significant. f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Determination: Less than Significant The proposed. project does not include any roadway improvements. Due to the small scale of the project, no new transportation infrastructure would be constructed. However, as noted above alternative transportation is provided in close proximity to the project site and construction of the proposed project would not preclude the construction of further October 2014 Page 90 City of Baldwin Park TTM No. 72915 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration alternative transportation infrastructure in the future. Therefore, impacts associated with transportation policies, plans o, programs would be less than significant. 4.17 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Less Than ` Significant UTILITIES AND �� ^ ' �/ ^ Significant Mitigation Significant ^ j � Would the � '~ ��� ��g��� � |�,�ImDa� ��" incorporation � �Impact � /�^�~-~-- �8��d�a��u�L�u�e� ' requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b\ Require or result tn the construction of new water nr wastewater treatment F� facilities oz expansion of existing tac|ib ea, �� the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d Require or result inthe construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the �� �� construction o1 which could cauae significant environmental effects? J) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project 6ornexistbxS [—| �� entitlements and resources, oz are new or expanded entitlements needed? e\ Result ina determination hythe wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that ithas adequate capacity to serve the project's pro/eoteddeonuodinuddidnnhthe provider's existing commitments? h8ee�zvedb�a\andfiUvv�tbanLUcimot ' permitted capacity tnaccuozo�odutethe F—| F—\ ��� F� �� �� �� �� project's solid waste disposal needs? g} Comply ' statutes and regulations related tosolid [X u | u 1 U-J El waste? City of Baldwin Park Page 91 October 2014 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis TfM No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration Would the Project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? Determination: No Impact. The proposed Project would develop 51 residential dwelling units that would be connected to the existing domestic sewer system serviced by the City for conveyance to the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County via the 12 -inch trunk sewer located in Baldwin Park Boulevard. Wastewater is treated at the San Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant ( SJCWRP) or the Joint Water Pollution. Control Plant (JWPCP) if wastewater flows exceed SJCWRP capacity, which is 100 million gallons per day. The Project would not generate wastONAlator a„rl, ns ;nrl„ctr;al nr avriculhiral effluent, Surface runoff from the Proiect is addressed in the Hydrology and Water Quality responses (a), (c), (e) and (f) of this Initial Study. The development of 51 residential units is not anticipated to cause significant wastewater 'treatment capacity issues because of its relatively small size. The City's General Plan Environmental Impact Report indicates that the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, Sewer Maintenance Division, and the Baldwin Park Engineering Division consider the sewer line system adequate to handle foreseeable future development. The Los Angeles County Sanitation District No. 1.5 serves the Baldwin Park area and must comply with the wastewater treatment regulations and requirements of the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board. Because of the Regional Board compliance requirements, wastewater treatment requirements of the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board are no anticipated to be exceeded. Therefore, no impacts would occur. b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Determination: Less Than Significant Impact. The Project will eventually develop 51 residential dwelling units on approximately 3.6 acres. The Project would have a density of approximately 14.2 dwelling units per acre, which is under the maximum allowable density of 16.2 dwelling units per acre allowed for development of the site per the existing Kerman. Center Specific Plan. The Project will be required to pay connection fees for sewer services. Because it is anticipated that the Project will contribute minimal flows to the existing treatment facility at a density of 14.2 dwelling units per acre, is required to pay facility connection fees that would mitigate for expansion impacts (if necessary), and the current SJCWRP treatment facility has capacity, and backup capacity to JWPCP if exceeded, to accommodate the Project, impacts are considered less than significant. c) Require or result in the construction of new stormwater drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Determination: Less Than Significant Impact. The Project would utilize the existing storm drain system in Merced Avenue, Baldwin Park Boulevard, and Kenmore Avenue, as well as provide drainage through the site. The increase in impervious surfaces will marginally increase runoff from the project area. The Project would incorporate water quality features that will be reviewed and approved by the City. October 2014 Page 92 City of Baldwin Park TTM No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis Because the Project is considered as a relatively small development that would not generate significant runoff, construction or expansion of new regional or off -site storm drain facilities would not be required. Therefore, less than significant impacts would occur in this regard. d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? Determination: Less Than Significant Impact. The City's water supply is provided by three water district /companies: Valley County Water District (VCWD), San Gabriel Valley Water Company (SGVWC), and Valley View Mutual Water Company (VVMWC). VCWD is the water purveyor that would serve the Project site. VCWD's 2013 Water Master Plan (updated in May 201.4), indicates that there is sufficient water supplies and water shortage contingency plans to protect existing and future regional water needs. The existing Kerman Center Specific Plan allows for a density of up to 16.2 dwelling units per acre. The Project proposes 51 dwelling units on 3.6 acres. The VCWD Water Master Plan projected up to 58 units for the site, but the Project proposes 51 units, which is below the demand projected by VCWD. Construction of the Project would require development /connection fees which would mitigate impacts to water supply. VCWD has water access from multiple sources, but prefers local groundwater sources and a small amount of imported water from Covina Irrigation Company. VCWD has an adjudicated right to 3.01517% of the operating safe yield of the Main San Gabriel Basin. VCWD indicates that they are confident that it can successfully obtain a combination of prescriptive rights, groundwater leases and purchases, and replenishment water to achieve a production of water up to 9,565.6 acre feet per year in any given year out to year 2035. Because the Project is consistent with VCWD's water supply projections; that there are sufficient water supplies to serve the Project and region; and that the development /connection fees required for project implementation would help mitigate the future new or expanded entitlements that potentially may be needed with future regional growth, impacts are considered less than significant. e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Determination: Less Than Significant Impact. Wastewater collection for the City is in the service area of the Los Angeles County Sanitation District No. 15. Wastewater is treated at the San Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant (SJCWRP) or at the Joint Water Pollution Control Plant in Carson ( JWPCP). SJCWRP provides primary, secondary and tertiary treatment for 100 million gallons of wastewater per day. JWPCP provides both primary and secondary treatment for approximately 280 million gallons of wastewater per day and has a total permitted capacity of 400 million gallons per day. Development of the Project would require development /connection fees that would mitigate impacts to wastewater treatment facilities. Because the Project is considered to be a relatively small development, the two wastewater facilities currently has capacity to serve the Project, and the City, SJCWRP and JWPCP would review the Project's development plans to determine a fair share fee contribution to mitigate impacts to wastewater treatment facilities, impacts are considered less than significant. City of Baldwin Park Page 93 October 2014 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis TTIVI No, 72915 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration f) Be served by o landfill with sufficient permitted to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? Determination: Less Than Significant Impact. It is anticipated that waste generated by construction of the proposed Project n/nn|d be serviced byWaste Management of the Sun Gabriel /PozoonaValley. VYuahe Management transports waste to the Azusa Transfer Station/Valley Vista and then to El Sobrante Landfill in the City otCorona. The B|Sohcuote Landfill has arenuutoing capacity of 179 million tons and an expected design lifeapao of about 33 years as of January 1, 2012. It has a daily permitted capacity of 16,054 tons/day and it is assumed that the landfill could receive up to 4,000 tons per day from Los Angeles County. It is not anticipated that the additional vvuate generated bythe Project would result in x significant adverse impact to tbe capacity of the landfill because of the ze|advm|w yonaU size of the project. The E] Sohrunte landfill is currently slated for closure in January 2O45. The generation of additional construction- related waste is considered minimal and. would only be temporary, and would cease upon completion of the proposed Project. Solid vvaahe generation during project operation is anticipated to he rninbnaJ because of only 51 residential units added W the City's vvaahz production, and would not reaniL in u oigoifiomd increase in vvushe for disposal in area landfills. The Project would be required bmbe in compliance with adopted programs and federal, state, and local regulations pertaining to solid waste. Therefore, less than significant impacts would occur. g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Determination: Less Than &e�rhn �17��above. �e would be hobcin with adopted programs and federal, state, and local regulations to solid waste. Therefore, less than significant impacts would occur. October 2014 Page 94 City of Baldwin Park TT'M No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis 4.18 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Less Than Significant MANDATORY FINDINGS OF Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No SIGNIFICANCE -- Impact Incorporation Impact Impact a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or S.'ilµllife r nr lllatinn to drnp below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a ® Q ❑ plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ( "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are ❑ ❑ Q ❑ considerable when viewed in connect-Ion with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial ® ® Q ❑ adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? The following findings have been made, regarding the mandatory findings of significance set forth in Section 15065 of the CEQA Guidelines, based on the results of this environmental assessment: a). Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self - sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Determination: Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Refer to the discussions identified in 4.4, above. With the implementation of mitigation measures, less than significant impacts would occur. City of Baldwin Park Page 95 October 2014 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis T IVI No. 72915 Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration b). Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ( "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Refer to the discussions above. With the implementation of mitigation measures, less than significant impacts would occur. c). Does the project have environmental effects which would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Refer to the discussions above. Less than significant impacts would occur. October 2014 Page 96 City of Baldwin Park TTIVI No. TB15 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 4.19 DETERMINATION (To be completed bv the Lead (}n the basis of this initial evaluation: [] I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will beprepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be m significant �n |b�a ouae because the mitigation oneaouea described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will baprepared. O I find that the proposed project MAYbaveaaigniDcuntehectontheenmirnnozer'tand an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ia required. 0 I find that the proposed project MAYbuvraei 'GcantuBed(s)ontheenvirounneotbot at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier unoJyaie as described on attached sheets, if the effect is u "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant nu|eaa mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects thatrezoajn to be addressed. O Ifind that although the proposed project could have u significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT beasignificant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier BDl pmeomd to applicable standards, and (6) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier BIfL including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed . Signature�__ Printed Name Amy Harbin, AICP Z)obs: City of Baldwin Park Page 97 October 2014 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis TTM No. 72915 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK October 2014 Page 98 City of Baldwin Park M-Namowl CITY OF BALDWIN PARK PLANNING DEPARTMENT 14403 E. Pacific Ave. Baldwin Park, CA 91706 5.2 PREPARERS OF INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION RBF Consulting, a company of Michael Baker International 40810 County Center Drive, Suite 100 Temecula, CA 92591-6022 Kevin Thomas, CEP, Project Manager Eddie Torres, Air Quality / GHG / Noise Specialist Darren Edgington, LEED AP BD+C, Environmental Planner Nicole Marotz, AICP, Environmental Planner Peter Minegar, Environmental Planner Hilary Potter, Technical Writer 5.3 REFERENCES: Baldwin Park TTM 72195 Project Traffic Impact Analysis, Prepared by Land Development Consultants, Revised August 201.4 Baldwin Park Unified School District web site htto://www.bl2usd.netl accessed September 16, 2014. California Environmental Protection Agency State Water Resources Control Board (Los Angeles Region) web site ht: / /www.swrcb.ca.ov/ accessed September 17, 2014. City of Baldwin Park General Plan Update 2020, Adopted November 2002 City of Baldwin Park General Plan Update 2020 Final Program Environmental Impact Report, September 2002 City of Baldwin Park Page 99 October 2014 Section 5.0 References TFIVI No. 71925 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Baldwin Park, Initial Study and Notice of Preparation for the City of Baldwin Park General Plan Update 2020, December 1998 City of Baldwin Park, Comprehensive Park and Recreation Master Plan. Website, http://www.baldwinpark.co.m/index.php?option7—content&task=view&id=276. Accessed September 19, 2014. City of Baldwin Park web site htto://www.baldwinpark.com/ accessed September 15 through September 22, 2014. County of Los Angeles Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan, 2012 Annual Report (August 2013). County of Los Angeles Fire Department web site htto://www.fire.lacountv.Qov/ accessed September 16, 2014. County of Los Angeles web site htto://www.lacounty.govLwps/portal/lac accessed September 17, 2014. Federal Emergency Management Agency, "Map Service Center" Website, <https:llmsc.fema.gov/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/FemaWelcomeView?storeld=10001&c atalog!d=10001&langld=-1> Limited Phase 1 Site Assessment, Prepared by Cal Land Engineering Inc. March 2008 Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County web site httl2:/Lwww.lacsd.orz/aboutLis/default.qs�R accessed September 16, 2014. State of California Department of Conservation "California Important Farmland Finder" Website, <http://maps.conservation.ca.gov/ciff/ciff.html> Accessed April 27, 2014 State of California Department of Toxic Substances Control, "EnviroStor" website, <http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov> Accessed on May 8, 2014. Soil Engineering Investigation Report, Prepared by The Soil Guys, May 2006 Percolation Testing Report, Prepared by the Soil Guys, July 16, 2007. Report of Geotechnical Update, Proposed Mixed-Use Development, SWC Merced Avenue and Baldwin Park Boulevard, Baldwin Park, California. Prepared by Duco Engineering, Inc., May 24, 2013. October 2014 Page 100 City of Baldwin Park Appendix A: Air Qual ity/G reen house Gas Data Parenthetical CALEEMODAssumptions For: Baldwin Park TT88 No. 72815 Project Date: September 2014 Demolition (2015) * 20 days. Quantity Type Hours of Dailv Operation 1 Concrete/Industrial Saws 8 2 Rubber Tired Dozers 8 Site Preparation (2015) * 10 days. Equipment (CALEEMOD Default): Quantity Type Hours of Daily 3 Rubber Tired Dozers 8 4 Treoto 8 Grading (2015) 0 30 days. Equipment (CALEEMOD Default): Quantity Type Hours of Daily Operation 1 Grader U 1 Rubber Tired Dozer 8 2 Tnaotora/Loadora/Baokhoeo O 2 Scrapers U 0 300 days. � 3 FOddhfta 8 1 Generator Set U 3 Tnaotors/Looders/Beohhoes 7 1 Welder U Operation 0 20 days. Quantity Type Hours of Dailv 2 Rollers 8 2 Paving Equipment 8 Architectural Coating 120116) 0 20 days. Quantity Type Hours of Daily Operation 1 Air Compressor 6 NUAZIAN 0 51-oingka-f8noik/ residential units. 0 486 daily trips. C) 0') 0 \ Cl) 0 2 E w 0 U) 0 w G C) cu C*4 6 Z 0 0 ■ ■ (M 04 04 C� -LA <D E 'a » (D U) LL (13 C a Z; 0 CL Cq 0.o Z (M 04 04 C� m (D 4- 0 z 4) E E 0 (D G D 0 0 0- D ;t� = ;t:� :t.� :!::! = 2 -a m = m = m = � \ ) \ \ \ \ \ \ E E E E E E 0" CL c- .0- CL .0- .6- 0� 0 CT cr a- 07 cr 07 a) UJ UJ LU W W UJ -0 .0 -0 -0 -0 -0 0-oin-000000orm u r- c I I E a) 0 1— Z:= t� �-L 1-1 ItL 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w -LA E 'a » (D U) r 0 w U) m E u 75 E OR 0 CY) ■ CL 4) 0 N -E C) 04 0 D 0 m (D 4- 0 z 4) E E 0 (D G D 0 0 0- D ;t� = ;t:� :t.� :!::! = 2 -a m = m = m = � \ ) \ \ \ \ \ \ E E E E E E 0" CL c- .0- CL .0- .6- 0� 0 CT cr a- 07 cr 07 a) UJ UJ LU W W UJ -0 .0 -0 -0 -0 -0 0-oin-000000orm u r- c I I E a) 0 1— Z:= t� �-L 1-1 ItL 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w . . � . � o .� .w -->-- 'm --~-- cu .� �o CU co _-�-- .� �. .� CO CD C14 � � O CL 0 W, OR -4 L4K. ", : C', 00 , v : - co C\! M ........................... O v0 8 Cl 0 0 v0 C) p p ---------------- N C'l C) C) 4 :14 00 5 :10 LO LO C� CN ...................... co ................ S 'o :� L'o O o ------------ a) C, C\l 0 O C) :C) .................v..... :0 :g a O O Iwo :0 ---------- (0 0 0 O O ...................... -0 C) C, co C, .......... ...... �C4 ---------- ----------- 'T :cl m C, C, 0 0 X N 'C\l Ci n .0 'r ............ .......... :Cl .......... .................. .......... 0 ui O -9 I-W L4, I-- Cl) 'p ,o ........... D C, D 0 ----------- 0 ----------- a M O C', C, cl� C'o C� cli (a 1 � 2 -M to C14 :0 O :a; It :q r� I- '(D ........................... 04 :0 M ID C, a :it .......... .......... :C) =1 0 O Ci O D :0 :0 ---------------- O ........... CY) C) 0 O . C=; .0 ........................... S C.) O MO :0 :In ............ .0 0 c) :(o .(q C� LF 16 a ..........., . ....C.. MO Z) :00 f0 Y C, (D 'C3 :O CR ::O LO I ........................... (D E :m 20 --------------------------- a) O C, C, 0 O Ot ........................... C) 0 C, :CD 0 ................... ;N :Q O) N C14 -Q Cl) cl :!�? :�2 C; .0 COO N ca . a) -00 iii co (u ic W I-W L4, cl) CY) LF 16 f0 Y (D E -CD :CD 0 :N ;N :Q - C�, -Q LO :!�? :�2 :�2 COO N . _ .......... � iz LO LO ;in :CD :(0 LO .O .O Z Z m U) C) eN .04 (D Q m - 04 Ic) (D ..C: • cl, 0 c 16 Cc: 0 C CIIL • :0 cm 0) to 0 10 to m a. co (D- (3) n- :0- :< . ................. (A 0 a. z 01 — 'N •M '-It 'LO ' CD Q CL � � 0 cn a. � 2 | � (5 Cli Co . � V- 0 :� �� |� �� �� |� �� :� �� �� '� �� .� :� � �� . . . . . . . |� . . . . . . . |� . . . . . . . /� . . . . . . . �� . . . . . . . �� . . . . . . . �� . . . . . . . �� . . . . . . . �� . . . . . . . �� . . . . . . . �� . . . . . . . �� . . . . . . . '� . . . . . . . '� . . . . . . . �� . . . . . . . |� . . . . . . . �� . . . . . . . /� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a'-6,C -~—'-.F4'��-~�':�-'��-��—��-^a�'��—��^�-��--��-:��'�--��' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �m . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �� �m :� �� �m �0 �� �� �� �� �m �0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . '��' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' ' ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -;(D' - . . . . . . . . . . -;/�- . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . -���- . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . .��' . . . . . ' . . . . . - � �q |� - q .. q ,q P -q q :. q q q -. q -9 q �q q q �q o `m . . . . . '� . . . . . '� . . . . . � . . . . . `� . . . . . . m . . . . . 'm . . . . . '� . . . . . '� . . . . . . � . . . . . . " . . . . . '� . . . . . '� . . . . . 'q . . . . . 'm . . . . . '-.00 . . . . . co . . . . . :00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . o co ca � �o o E2 . E2 cc Co's�� o i i ! i i i i� i� i � �= � � ' � ' � � � . . | . . q � � � �_��_��_�W_^"_��__��_��_�s_��_��__�c_�a_�c_���_��___ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �� . � . � . � . . . . . . . � � � | � � � � : : � � � � | �5 �� �� � � � � �� | � � � � � �� � ro- C', MCL � �o 1 . � � � � � . �� .� �� .� � . � . . � �e . s . �� . �� . �� . �� . �� . �� . �e . �� . �� . �� . �� �> � �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� |� �� �� |� �� �� m co .(D |m L< -,L< ..X -.?5 -.L( D g CD C) o 0 O c! C� C� C� q 0 c) CD :0 :0 :0 N C\l N C-4 :N :N .0) E5 - y o25-6- -."5- - O . C� .0) :o :Co :cc O -0 :C) :(D :0 :0 0 C) :C) :C) :C:) :C) 0 o o q O o :C) :0 c) :C) o 0 .0 0 q . CD O C) q C) q O c) :6 :Lo CS o L) 0 ry 0 X L< > m L6 .2i :O L< -,L< ..X -.?5 -.L( D g CD C) o 0 O c! C� C� C� q 0 c) CD :0 :0 :0 N C\l N C-4 :N :N .0) E5 - y o25-6- -."5- - O . C� .0) :o :Co :cc O -0 :C) :(D :0 :0 0 C) :C) :C) :C:) :C) 0 o o q O o :C) :0 c) :C) o 0 .0 0 q . CD O C) q C) q O c) :6 :Lo CS o L) 0 ry 0 > m L6 :O D W 0 ............ > 0 U 7C3 r = 0 ............ 70 m 0 w -0 a) > M 70 UC)L (1) 7E3 F a) > a) W M a) a) =3 cc 12 0 : lcN :(j .,Z- 12 o cc c Coll 0 f- 2 0 CL : col OU) E -0 o :.2 n . Ff) J) rn n- .2 -T r_ 0 L) 0 ry 0 > m D W 0 W 2 0 > 0 U 7C3 r = 0 (u a) -0 a) U) 0 70 m 0 w -0 a) > M 70 UC)L (1) 7E3 F a) > a) W M a) a) =3 a) w U) 70 m 0 c M W A I Qi O -9 O C) oo o ........... U) oo 4D 0 O Z 0 :Q :o o o O 0 O 0 ll ------------ 04 0 co co 2 c� In FO :c; ........... co o o l OR co m co In oo Z ----------- 04 0 C) 0 ol 'O c N cV CL F- c, cli X c, 6 N lb a V: c4 IN LL CL ................. 04 o a 0 W M C! (D c, CL ........... c) o Wjr w O tq ................. N a) ID d) > co o C u. ........... N 0 :lD 0 0 ............ I N o O co C, m 0 Z :a o 6 O ----------- D 8 d. ii co 04 cl o O 0 c, N F I o I m M L) Qi O -9 U� ll� O ............... 'O O O •0 :cl :cl 2 o C, C-1 C3 O co ---------- .......... :0 O C � ci :0 0 0 (1 O ---------- N O : 0 C, 00 o . . f- C, N 0 0 ............ :0 o (D :t Cl) t� O C 0 ..P U 2 0 W 40 (D O O O O O O O 04 1 pie' O CL a. (D ] o : 'rn of ] 'o a) J 'o 'u� u� 0 ] :O :, 116 d > e 0 O R] O nc3 ] o p O O O ] O �C p C O °u J O N N ] O W f0 J O i b co co C N N O Ap ] O �C> O O ] 'O 'O O '!TlR777!l�.� J O 6 > O O O ] 'O 'O O O O > O :ll� p I O > o N IN > °O •N d > 'O O M O M ] O > O �0 p 0 p > e0 > O N d > O p O ] 'O 'O p O O J O :p p C O J :O > O O p > O O p O O o O > �O ............�.... mzt 0 M o o 0 0 o > : o cl o a! oo > o °00 0o O J 'O �Q O H O L U 0 N C 0 O O N J O 6 > O O O ] 'O 'O O O O > O :ll� p I O > o N IN > °O •N d > 'O O M O M ] O > O �0 p 0 p > e0 > O N d > O p O ] 'O 'O p O O J O :p p C O J :O > O O p > O O p O O o O > �O ............�.... mzt 0 M o o 0 0 o > : o cl o a! oo > o °00 0o O J 'O �Q O H O L U > o °00 0o O J 'O �Q O H O L U d O .p .M 0) N O O o o o rn N rn c U o 0 0 0 Q N o ' °o :0 00 Z O v 0 v N d O O " -... V....- .' - - -- N S Q O 'O •N N (j '. O �O •O O O • to O N O O :o ;O O .......... O U o o b i O o o ;m m Z ' N O ' � U O O O O 07 ci a ` a ,00, ;o ° N o N N O o 0 .x o 0 61 O ;o ui '.' N o vo •° O G. 6. ° v° .N N o W d p O N p . O . p _ Ste'' O : O • O '° 0 0 0 ;n n N L � O 'O a. X LLj •- r G O O O ci ' N O O O O to o to O H;a� ® Z oo 'oo ; °m° m° v n � . Lc; O V C7 0 '°p •o y o� LO r i O ° ° : °o o o 0 °o o O N O.V.....r... U = � �q o 7Zj w >° .s °� M ] o •o m J o 3 O O O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 J J O �O d J io .d d ] ,O 3 ,o op O O O ] �O O O ] °O J •O 00 •p O ] O O ] ] •O •O •d' V J J �O �O O J :C (M M 3 O M M ] 'O •N d J J O �O d d J O O M p M O O O ] J O 'O o 'p p O O ] ;o 0 ; o ® p i .o eri � ....V.....1... 3 ] 2 Ico d O .O y. O O O ] ] ] O 'O 'O d •p M •p p d O M O O ] O M p M O ] O •O 00 3 O M M ] 'O •N d ] O p p O O ] 'O ,N o N O i •o :v O N HS2 o o o I p O ] 'O •M O M C L U n a m 3 ;Y o h y. fti :: O -9 o . . . . . . . . . . . . o d) CS C, .......... ID -0 .0 0 ........... 0 : ti :0 :0 o :0 0 o ................ 0 :0 :0 0 :0 C, .a O O O O dm o 0 Lo o O Lo T- C) C4 LO C-i J ,M M tC J J ,O ,N M J � eo eO Q1 N J e0 0 O J ] a BOO BOO °o J ] o 0 0 0 .m o .. ° °Y.....1..__ ] C, CI J � �O e0 N ] ] eM N eo et N ] ] e0 :lD � r e e N N 7 e0 e0 e e O ] d d m BOO ] o Oo ] ] o Cl a o ] eN eN 0 e0 M d O M e0 o o O MO 'N N J � p 'O O 7 ;M 0 O o o M •O N o O elD LaW ,N 0 O e e O W N 0 b M o j e0 e0 e � O e � e0 M e0 M p iO O M V j0 0 ° e0 ° O L j e� e� O e e U c c o t0 L .>c .3: 0 r_ 0 V 0 :m :M 24 : - O N - - - - - - - - - - 0 C) C3 :0 ca, 0 M C, :C� C, C� N O N CO Cl! .10 C\! O C, O C, 0 M C, O O 0 0 C, ot d) C, 6 10) CO •6 .......... ............... :C) O C) •cq J O ti ........... 3 vM (N --------------- O 13 C4 a 0 .0 r .-0 u U) 0 a () 0 M co LO N CO W p O oq O O O J O O O O O O J °O °0 i i O J J O i0 O i0 O O O i0� O M O J W O Lo 7 CO ] 00 b ] J OJ ' O] O J iV i0 � j i0 i0 O ] iN iN i0 M d O M ] 0 0 0 O O O ] I�q ic0 i0 d; °ti °N M i0 7 p 7 in O eF 7 iM i0 d' j i0 i0 i0 i0 o" O 7 O °� O D O °O °O p 'O W O iW O i0 O ....i,.......... 7 o O 0 O 00 7 M OJ ........ ....... 7 °d) i ( M M 0°O i7 H.-O O O 0 7 7 0 O iN O O �N 7 iM ip d N 000 7 ,O ,O O 7 7 iN O M N 0 p h N S p O O 7 6 .o °MO :o °o m V � �o � V O C i i N O N M N cv Z O O O O O O O O O •O •O O 0 0 o O O Hie, d O � b O N O O ° W co U O •N O m d O (a O • W F o ;rn o N O t. U ° O a O O oR •r co O • T • 01 r Z • N U -- m o e <i °p ; °o o . °o Mo oo 0 cL o . oo ;moo o 00 O N N �O ° O O x(L O °N ... •O V O uj M C6 ep O = N • O d. • O M O •O p •O p O °.� o" am = 1L ;O Op ;Qp o aO M •N N O N d O M p N N p 0 •O M M r I n d. j- ° • O o O O ° o � etn •(p Lo o N ..... F.....4..... y O O °� • N O °O V •O N O V X O O O O a. LLI N e • p ci °,.� w O d C .....n.......... e • p ° • ti7 °O •p _ r O M • M o :o h o eN � O M 00 o d u- ;r oo N O N cV 0 O O ° p p °O p •O O O O O ep O •N O O V O 0 p O o N oM0 4% O e0 O O e • � o o •N ;O M n OX o N O O M •O M O M (� +- •°N ° •� ° O O dL+ ui N M N Q U � s Z rn > fC G7 O �+ O U. 2 ; � ~ � C� G ILO C M O V [F ap °tn 1A �O O O o i O °o O a0 00 O a0 a� N a O O sC3 O o O p o O ,O ep p � 6 o ) ap aW CO ] °O J �O �O stn b S .o a a � a0 a0 O 0 0 q o a O o a a O O p o p ,O 05 O G O 00 O °N ° M W O O p (0 p O O (D o ,O ....A.......... 'O d N O p o" ,O a0 O O O J a0 ....A.....R... O O o o t0 O O N N ) a0 p M O M ....A.....R.... aO O O co O O a O o � q O W O ° O a a a > o O Q O o O L a0 O N U a c� 1G a) 0 a 0 U) a 0 L) SE f-: I a r- �P 0 m �p 0 43 S ce) 0 :o w 0 O O U? 0 10 ........... 'O 04 o o o Z c, O c, o o W 0 c. O cl :,r Lo ........... 0 8 c� im 04 c, 0 CT,l c� c,i o O o :o o o e o o F- O c� :o o o a. cl IN o ' o o c, o 6 oo x : : > ,t oo L= a. L o .......... :a p a ID O co o to O oo c, O .......... o :Lo M c) a) o o ca o o o oo m o :o O ------------ :c, ; o > .;z '52 O :o :a M a C C. o :o o :o I-- ° f- o u- cl! 04 0 :o M oo o oo U) oo ........... :o o C4 oo c� c� . �2 g! .5 H�t O :o :ai 'p V of i OX 0 c, o o o 0� Oq Im w :o c, o ........... V..... I co Y.._. to CD c > 0 I -A I a r- �P 0 m �p 0 43 S ce) toO o ,O .O ] ,o O0 o > o 0 0 o o J ,o 00 c o o ] O N N J o J a0 3 ,O :o O ] 'O J O o O ] 'o O O ] O o O ] ,O O O 77°!6!l77TL ] �O ,o d ] O ] O O 0 p O o N O ] �O eN ] 'O oV d O O ,O ] O ,O 'o O ] O ,N d ] 0 O O O O ] ,O ,N ° Ici 0 ] 'O ] 'O ] 'O oV d 'O O D O 'O O ] 'O p O O o d d LO J �O ] O ,O O m Lo ] ° H7t , ,N ,O ] ° O , N N O N °O d ] O ] O I O � O L U G O F R O O O ............ O O :0 04 'O :O O............... 0 :C5 p O :O O :C) C :0) .......... .......... O O ........... 0 ............ cs C', a) I 0 W 0- a) m 0 is C\l eN eN eV i ern J e0 2 cli lo oo 3 C; 3 co 4 N , D D m c, O 11 Ic, • • a haj LL ll� IRT IJ (D w 0 L6 00 ro ..................... o c, '0 S 0) :� O M n :lo ........... O ' O c3 O :cl -o : 8) MO v0 c-, 83 -a ........... ''O C, o 'O m 'o :° :0 o O to eD �o ..................... :o m :o c, o :o o :0 c� o " co ..................... :8 :8 0 C) 0 O e0 O O O v0 v0 C! O v ----- e ----- e.... cl! is cc :w :z Z (D U) D LO -H LU E Ci c LO D �Ii� i ,� co (L) T- U) 'co D -Z5 M Z >1 -E 0 O .n C'4 O O 10 r v0 4 O M :(0 C) :N O O O ---------- co cc 0 0 .......... N O (0 cl; 4) .10 0 C, O C6 O.......... .......... G C, C, 0 C6 ol C\j C :Cl 0 :0 9992stalls 0 C14 (.0 =) C'i J v0 Jv0 ---------------- ccq w .......... .......... :00 vN 0 .0 C! D C, r ........... Mr :O M :0 :0 ci M :o :0 ..................... co ...................... m r7 :6 :6 :6 U E :E .4-- ca a) o c 2 o CL 0 o 00 lu C, :C> C, o 0 o :c; 2 IN ........... I C) 0 0 :C, vtn a C', CN O O O 'o :0 :;: :C5 d7 v O ........... I ........... I C, CC, O :C, C, CN ........... I ........... 0 :C, O :cl :cl c) O Cc, If! CR C\j (U 0 v0 0 C) C5 0 C, CR 0 C5 ........... ............ O •O : 0 :0 C, C, C5 0 C,4 ----------- ----------- I 0 o ........... C0 o ........... ........... :Cl ............ ............ ca co U e') O O m O O LO 0 CD Vs M U- E 0 0 0 U- 3: 0 co LL C: 0 0 ca U) .s 0 F- 0 H 3: 0 co 0 U) 9 LL 0 cu (D C: CO O ca 0) cn E cn D C\j ........... 0) (D M m N D O 0 19290•M.292 O cc a) 41 "Coal 5a O 00 cv O co n. ca O ca Cc Ci E co O 4= 0 0 CL O O LO 77 'IT C\l r— m bi Mu r') Cl) C) 0 5- w W (o C) i� 0 0 5- w Q M C) cr) 4) cli r- a 6 3: Z rL 0 r 0 -6 (j) Im ■ F9 I C) CN N CY) cli C� C) LL 0 m 2 a .a . a CL 0 C-4 0 z :r_ C) CN N 0 z E E 0 0 t a) 0 cn a) 0 CD a- -n — E E E E E E coo c- o- CL CL '5 '5 5 5 m a- cr a- 0- cr _r_ W u± UJ W W U3 -0 �o _0 0 0 0 § 0 0 m -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r U) \ \ \ _ 0 W 6 LLI E co M m E a) m r_ m 00 C) -2 L) 0) U) e.0 o N E 0 U) r_ CN C-4 0 C) 0 z E E 0 0 t a) 0 cn a) 0 CD a- -n — E E E E E E coo c- o- CL CL '5 '5 5 5 m a- cr a- 0- cr _r_ W u± UJ W W U3 -0 �o _0 0 0 0 § 0 0 m -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p. IL CN o ll Co .0 CL 0 cu C) _r_ (U E E O E W a cli 0 E W E E x O O .2 C14 O O -P O -9 Q. I 0 4� ..P E r_ D co 4 m LO I O� N 4 In, 8 I o ................ :c, ol co co - ----------- - -- .......... o o a o :o) :n .......... o :o o :M n m C11) Lo 04 D ---------- :m M ............... D :r- :n n m 'm n w m h :ci °7 D a eD N N tW . O -9 d) r- a) cli 0 O o3 m 10 00 Ci 00 0 C14 r- :cS -0 z : M " ci O ................ o fp :cm � '�o N 0 C) I— :6 06 eT co OT (0 00 to C14 0 C) O � 0) m co 1- :00 CIL Z C' CN 0 co 00 :m cli -�r 0 U') CV 0 O O ci 0 ................ LO N C� LL a- ci 6 :0 C'4 O :m It a) LL 75 CL 00 C� m a? J. Lr) ............ LO LO LO LO ce -le Cl) cli X LLI :ci 6 E L L (L :(N 04 N LO 0 0 0 U) U) N C\l Cl) O C11 m m 76 4 .4 .N a; C4 U) X 0 Z O M Ci cn N (T! In -0 ........... m O : (0 -0 0 0 Q C14 0 N 'N :Q :N C14 6 •N 't 00 U) .00 0 tm o Cli Lli ::05 0 : rl 7— : 7 -- 0 O I O O iL (D 0 L) M ti Q. O O fp 0 M :CN O LO J. Lr) ............ LO LO LO LO ce -le E I 76 'O CD In -0 -C) -0 C) W Q :N 'N :Q :N :Q 00 U) .00 LO -M Cli •Q : rl 7— : 7 -- C\l CO LO '(D ca ca LO :CD O 04 C' CO O. :76 C :2 :0 N .r- 76 :0 o .0- eU ---------- z cou N r- CD cu 1.2 76- 0 0 CL . ac) :0- C::: 0 E 4- Q) 0 :U) :(D :co cu :a- 20 E I 0 Z N C) 't O O O iL (D 0 L) M ti Q. O CD Re- 0 L V El a� c� 0 U L .y V Q� i.. L d 3® 0 0 0 _ d 1 _ 0 Z L 0 0 _ l4 _ W N d _ 0 Z CC T 0 0 Olid d w LO T L 0 0 C _ c W b vW eM .M .r .00 .M .M vN .O .N .V' .r .N v� .W .M .O .V vO v� .r .M :�' .r .M .O eM .r .M 7 :O �O �O �O �Q �O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O ;O :O :O b .N _ .N .CO e .Ln .O .LO .Ln .r .d' lh .O �:r vLQ .CO co .O .W .W .N .N :N :N .O .r vO .M .07 :N :M .V :N :00 .._ 1.®J..4.J....4.J....M1.J..4.RJ.. 'O O 'O O O 'O O O O O 'O O 4 .R... 'O J....4... O }... 'O O .O ;O 'O O O ;O ;O 'O ;O 'O O ;O ;O D :m .m .00 'ti •m .co '00 :00 .m .c .r .m '00 .C3 .m .00 '00 .00 ...:... J.... S...:... J.... ;N 'M S... J. .............1....4...M1...J....L :N ;N ;N :CO N ...h... :(N J....S... �V CO i... :N ......... : U) N o N 'N m i .p .p O 7 ' N ;Q ;Q ;� :� : E :o :� :N � a :� 'a :� :o :o a`) .o :o :o :1- :F :N :L :N :W :� :� °� '� ' O L .w Q ' x ;O .0 ;X .w .v ; .w :p .� :(6 .a ;O .� ;7 .� .� : �— � �cn . :S C ;O ;O ,O ;O C ;O l6 'V 'V 'V 'U 'U p : 2 : ` : i : ` . C : C . 2 O .0 .0 .0 •C .� .N •C .O .O •O •Q 'Q. p p : C 01 : C 'O) ' C 'O) : C ° O ' O) _ �'p 'O : C '� ; C •� ; C 'O ; C ' O} '� :a 'N :a 'O ; C '01 ; C a 'a :a .a ' o ' o : 'a .a .a .a . > . o : m •a .a :n : @ :m : 9 : 9 :r) :Cn :ill W) •m F- F- x :.x :x :x ..x q- :F-1 :�l �l ?5 L< L< :.x :.x 1. 1.5 c) :CD 0 c) 0 O q I q O q q D :CD :C) 0 C) C) N 04 N CJ C11 N h...:....'..: . .. O . :(Si S�' CD r0 YO yO :C:) cc,) :0 :C) o :C; :cs 5-1 --- 13-16— --- I- C, (3. 5 :O :C5 .O : cc�) :O zi :C) 6 :L6 :C) :C5 0 C5 :o o ....................... : c 0 :.2 N 0 'a cc a - r C: 0 Ecu .2 C 0 QD Cn (D W :D T" cli L.L ZS ZS CB I • 'M N a0 aM � 01 ---------- N M atp p c N O 'tp N O V' a 7 p M a� Lo N W > O to J �O a0 N ................ 'O � a0 aV M a0 a0 O .......... e... J O O D O p ' O t0 co In ) 0 N0 t o N V O M 'O O N M V ,O ,O tV .......... V 'O N a° aO MO n 'o � to co V �O a0 pOj Qa cn V p V ° M t0 O ,O N O 7 0 0 r o o N N � a U a e 2 2 J o ---------- C, :0 2 C, ---- A.....•..... '4 :0 :04 a 0 0 ---- I..... r.... cO, :O 00 C, ............... C) .00 0 C, m C� .-i O 0 0 O p .......... I a 0 m m CL (1) U) Cl) M ID :o o m O O O i .o .N N i O O °N N 'O J :O .°f) N ) .o o :C6 00 i 'o 0 0 'N N ..........r.... ;O ;N �N J O J O O O J 'O J : O O O ] . O J .O J 'O O .� •O O b O C, ] O O ] 'O .N O N ] O O O O O J �O �N p N O ] .O .V Id` J O O O ] 'O •O O J 'O •O ] O • O M C, ] O O ] 'O .N O N ] 'O .O M O M ] 'O O N N p O O O ] O :M O M O J N N O J O O r LO LO } O W 7 O O W O V U ►- '. o .o .co w m N fl O ;00 N N U :06 0 0 o 00 O IN •N N fl Z � e • N fl O a rn O O N Ci O Cc, O •O O p O .O 'N O s0 O W O F- • � N N o ' o N fl LO U O 0 O 06 Z -N N N • fl U b m ........... V) O .O .M M .v 00 V Cl) .O .O O ................. 0 ; M ; N N Q M W a a - > N N O O .N N O . 0 . VN' N CL : O ' O • O O LL O _ r o N a - �' : O �O a0 O . � O ' O • N O 'O •° M N O 3 0) O M p O O .O •n O O O n 0 X w N n > o — o 'o 'n 3 LL . O ;O ,O O ..... r.......... O .O •O M ° O D O M O O US . M O M O O .O � ,N N to O 'O 'to 0 00 '00 ;m c U O ;° O ° o ® Z o 0 . 0 . 0 ° r O o°o o o 00 o O d ;o ;o o N U y 0 c_ •a .Y � (Q Cl) a • a CM .0 N C11 IN Z .......... 0 I'D 0 Hv-, ca In I, - I 10,S) CA 0 0 n 00 Q O O O Cl) N ----------- C) :n CN 0 In :n 0 .N 04 Z ----------- C11 0 ca C) 0 In If) cli CL O :CI n O O O (1) 0 Q 40 M ca n O :a C, n 0 0 0 W? o co .,p m m Lo CL LL 0 In o It) ID 6 ................. 0 n 1 0 . n :n o O 1 04 I Cl! In (D M tu o 17! ID d) o •o > 0 0 In CQ In O Cli um a. o ........... I I C-4 0 a n I 0 .In C) U) C! (D n Cl ,N I, C14 0 N H-W :n 00 co x 0 0 n co Z O O c; C; W) In ci :n .0 0 co :0 I I I VJ O c 0 0 (Dim -4- O O !o co O C, :C" o O l c .0 O O O 10 :0 :C5 .......... :c, O i :0 ............... C, I C, Cl ---------- 0 W o o Y Lo C14 a 0 0 LO cl; O [p n N c0 'N M O J . ...e'� N � .O . .O . °° ) u .m °M •O O o n 7 D m °w °O 'O n `N M ................ .O .O n .O O ,N M .W .O 0 ., W i 'O 'O O 'N O M .�.o0 O M O O O O ( O O ) n N d N ° � O O t0 O 'O O 'O °6J M N M O O co Ci O 0 ............... N N °O O O O . O O r O C6 O J J M O N M J 'O °N Cl! J .O O .O O O ,M O 0 0 O N Cl) > N N �0 O LO OD ............... l O ° )1l r O O t0 O o J .......... J O O O l0 J Lo O °O •O y, ° U9 U •O R F CD U) 4 0 c 2 4� U) c 0 I I C11 .......... ---------- a C) O OM, IO ............... Ca M IQ m :C, ,d 1�2 :N ............... .......... Mt O O :0 ............... C, C'4 0 Cc, :0) :a :C5 C, C, cli O 5 :0 :ci .......... C, C, 0 C:! cr� A.....'..... I D CN N :Cl ............ Im 03 'o O .......... `05 I c 0 0 M L0 cli •n .m M .C'4 .O N •N M �O O j 0 O !.----- 5 ---- 'n m ] :m N O ] m O W j O Cl O 'N M ............... j .� •V O J M p J .O .N d N O .......... r.... J 'O M M O M °°O r co ] O N M J J d c, M M O & ] m N J M p J .O .N d N O .......... r.... r co ] O N M 'M J O 'N J :O ,O N O J J . ...h..... h.... 'N °O fn0 D :O N :(3, U) 7 N J V .O 00 V d O o p .O 7 m N V n p O y, U CD ~ L .� �I� Ltfl M O O ,tfl tp N 0 00 �N LO N 'N M 0 Z o : o ; O co r o Lq o U p o .o o R v.............. '....__ N 0 m 4 O V Lo O.. : O �W �N O of O O co : b e to ' O OS 6 I O 'O 'b r �N Q M N 0 m O v n 6 b °W 'o m O O O tri O Z :N _.... ----------- M 0 0 d1 cq N O ° c}' L M n O a. o .Vt O O O N O ................. O ''b O °O :c N to O w IN O o O �� ° O X LI1 a. °� b _ ,(O W N t0 > : L : O Im- u- {3. O '� c�l O �N 'h a. ................. o 'O M ' :p M N O M :o O N i � co O O 'M 'I- O :. o O ' ap . o O M 'O 0 . O O O 'O O O M O Hf- N pj '� ' Lq O t0 } O ,O . .._ O N X 0 ,N O M O �O LO O ice+ L N� cn m � M N n O O °o o O CN p O N d cl o cu • o ; of , of N_ O M M O 2 O ,o .m O .O .M Ci M v . O 0 O O p O O F- o p :o 'v N O a O O O M M b pj O Z O <i b m U" C'i m o .o .m o ,o ..n o ,o .Cr o u� 0- o ,o .0 o •o •0 0 0 t 'O 0I Lx : O �O �� O N O W = N o ,o .v LL (L o •o •0 0 •� ~ .o O r O , O • N YA p d L� ' •O O O •O .o p O O O O x L W o �o .v r v, r � . 9 O •1� CL U- H;6.0 p O O 0 ° O '.'.} p O (n ° . ° � f Qc O O .V..'. -------- o o 0 N O °o °o CD O o m U o .0 .0 0 co ® °° "Oo N x z o o r_ Q o .0 0 0 :1 VO -- ...'..... ---- L .0 O :0 `o O O O O :o :o yama „ ® H3, .... . . .O O y F O C i GN e c � _ •O ~ V �1 :� c�c -9 ---------- �2 O :cl cS Nt 0 m ---------- O O M O O O ............... co o 81 O ol O O .......... :m O Lo O O :a O ........... :.o O O .(D C! 0 :c :0 `o5 I 0 C) A O-q ] •O rN ] N ] vICE e� � •o •V } •p •01 J •p •r ) ,p •N ] •p •M •O N J •O J 'O •O ] O d J O O V J O O CO, ] •o 'V :M .... A..... 4.... ] •O •O J ,O J •O •O 7 'O °O O 'O •O p O p O r ti ) °O •V °O •O O J O O U; J 'O •N 'O •O N J > 'O 'M 'O °N O M N :O R _ _ _ ... .. O .i.+ O N J O N N N J �O �O O O O ] O V O ) °O •O O O O O L 'i.• N , • U n a Y (D U -4- .......... C3 po -3 C C4 00 p O.......... (N --------------- C c) co C, cl� :0 :0 :0 :0 ............... CC, C, :C, m :0 co O :cl C, C, D 0 Ci A..... % :C4 O N D :0 D :0 .0 .......... D e0 :O 5 Q CO R r r m CO cc .2 P 4 i :C6 co co :CR Lo to O 0 E r_ 0 m E 0 tC E E Vd CL ai a 0 E 0 I VA 0) C) 0 00 .0) C\l C, co 0 C, J e0 J e0 03 D C� :5 :0 .......... M D ;to D 0 c.? D .0 ZZ as LO M 0) 41 'Owl as ca (n cu z 0 - 'Cl) N W O e0 e0 e� o O rr j �f") N O 0 er 00 ;00 eCl) eV" v ) U lz e N M eO N M 0 j :O :O a ' e N ,N :p C d U v, O a , N e a N 0 im � O ,O ,r- .N 1 0 U O a0 °� eO r` e :N, 0 N O Cj O e:C, C O etn ) °O °N 'N° Q Z r O N 'W O e e r` 10 N t6 OJ O e O co �O 2 ~ O ,O ,W ,O j eM �- O e0 .M e0 't4 N 'W 'O S �j ,M :C 1 � +_ tV e e W p �M O :O �M �O Y eW l r N O etn eM O 2 0 0 N d °O 'M 'O j 't•'j O 4.....Y.... .... y'.... e� .......... O 'O 'M 'O N O r 3 L O 0 co O > e0 j 'rj y �' T e0 em e0 O °O M ' 'O N 0 y. O a) °O d 0 O 'N �.....J.....a.... ....J..... S N .... r .-o V 04 O a 0 N N t O vN N 'N k 'C j L 0 e M Z e a� ,� eM e c; : s¢zaaszsax CA zzzx r;e axxzra¢sssnzaxx E U ca 'U .J e I y- - - - - e . . . . . ........... : d3 !0 m ;c 0 O cj ---------- n C'i O c (0 cq :cl ----------- 'CO ............ ..... :0 C', :00 Z C —3 M4 O O :0 --------------------- cc N ----------- :(D LO p eN ................ fl :10 Y, : c2 : :T: � W O C , 0 02 C) - ca O YV a) M U- E 0 0 0 LL 0 M U) .s U LL 0 U- 3: 0 —j 0 -2 LL 0 M U) E 0 .0 U) 3: 0 LL 3: 0 O Lij O M U) D 0) :3 W 0 CK; c U) 0 Q- E 0 C m 0) L) >1 L) a) 0 0 0 (D r.L c 0 ca a> M ai 0 0 C) CD 6 LO cn "r— L- 4) C.4 E E 0 z 0 CO \ C) 0 2 w ui cu 0 5 70 0 w w m C) ■ ■ ,9 0 cn D a) C14 CD C\! CD C\l C:) C� CD cr U. 0 C m r- a .0 09 CL of o z a) C14 CD C\! CD C\l 0 z 06 0 0 0) a- D :t.� ƒ = \ = ƒ 2 0 -0 -2 0- .r- E E E E E E 0 e&@ D- a- CL .0- a- 0 07 0- 07 0- or 0- W W W W W w _0 _ _0 -0 _0 -0 :D :D o o o o o o 0 cm -0 - - - - - - E C: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w CL w ca E 70 m C) L- m E co =3 UO) C) (CIO) IL &. C 0 0 E N 0 0 N -E Q E Cq = 0 Q D () 0 z 06 0 0 0) a- D :t.� ƒ = \ = ƒ 2 0 -0 -2 0- .r- E E E E E E 0 e&@ D- a- CL .0- a- 0 07 0- 07 0- or 0- W W W W W w _0 _ _0 -0 _0 -0 :D :D o o o o o o 0 cm -0 - - - - - - E C: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w 'w _-�- .� cu u' -`^-` . . � . � co CD n* IE � � � � O O W, O 0 41 cq m 3 :00 ................ Cl! ai :0 rw co cyi ----------- :0 O h a0 ................ C� O :0 ........... ai aM ---------- co 21 < :20i D c :00 .03 ........... •D :01 :P- cli ai :0, 0 O 0 M O W to O O O O :cl W C, O a O 6 ci 0 .......... m .0 :(o C; •O 0 0 • d) :4) In LO C\i C;174 c; LO C14 0 O M o .0 (O ........... (0 'Ir N O ... ......... d) :2i 0 LLJ I jJ 40 O 0 .:p 12 O O El Lo I- 0) U) 0- fC 0 ca 0 U) a) 5-7 (L 0 14.- U all O (D L ca .r- 0- i0 ca N co :N IN E LO :Ln :U) LO LO LO E 'Lo :Lo :Lo •co ,co :(0 'D (D -C) 0 :C) -0 ui 00 LO 2 :L�2 :�2 .............. r'l V- :0 Cn N 04 ci c) IM :2 CL o :C) 0 '01 :.C: ol E :0- -0 2 :.E- -a .5 (U CIS :(D CO :> CT' H E Z a) 'C :2 :6 Lo cu U) m = CL 0 0- C: 0 :00 10 co :a_ :< .......... -------- to 0 CL -N co •-'d- _'LO (0 40 O 0 .:p 12 O O El Lo I- 0) U) 0- fC 0 ca 0 U) a) 5-7 (L 0 14.- U all � Iii to � cq Oo T- )o CO �� CO �� �� :� �� �� �� �� �� �� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |� . . . . . . �� . . . . . . �� . . . . . . |� . . . . . . |� . . . . . . �� . . . . . . �u . . . . . . . �� . . . . . . . �� . . . . . . . �� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �� . . . . . . . �� . . . . . . . �� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �-��'��'�3- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �� �� �� |� :CO .m -� � � �� . . . . . . �� . . . . . . �� . . . . . . �� . . . . . . �� . . . . . . �� . . . . . . . |� . . . . . . . �� . . . . . . . �� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C', . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . '|a- . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . -�/s' . . . . . — . . . . . . . . . . -�Cs' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - -�c)- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' -�c)' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � �C� . q � � q q q I q .. q � q q q . q q q q q D '� . . . . 'm . . . . 'm . . . . . . . . . . � . . . . . � . . . . . '� . . . . . 'm . . . . . m . . . . . .� . . . . . '� . . . . . .� . . . . . .� . . . . . .� . . . . . . � . . . . . .� . . . . . . 'm . . . . . . 'm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �-<��-t�—��-���-��-'��-(�-i���'(�-�--`--|�' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �--+—f—'�—';—�—+—'�-- . . . . . . . cn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' � �N � � ' �� �� �� �� � � . �� US �� � � �� �� � ` ' ' � � ! ! � � �� �� � uj � � 0 -0 x o � z �> �e � 0 '�--��-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . '�.—. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . —.=-�_'= . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . —�`— . . . . . . . . . . . . � --. . . . . . . =-,— . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . m� . � . � . � . . . . . . . . . . . � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � : cn �C: �� �C � � � � .� . I I . �b � � � �u �u �u � � � � �o � � � � | � �» : : : CZ CM � CM � CM � CM . � . .� .� � cn . � . . � �e . . :� . �� . :� . :� . :� . �� . �E . :� . �- . �2 � �� �� �� �� -� �� �� :� .� �� �� �CD CD -CL :�o m co D :C) :0 :0 :0 •0 r T- T- ..X .�x -.X -.X ..X :7- ::E :2 :2 ------------ '.x :2i :2i :2 :5; 5 0 :C) 0 0 a o lO lO lO O lO :0 :0 :0 :<D :C) N 04 C4 C4 04 N --o- 0- -- - :-o- Co 'CO CO Co 'CO 'IT of 'It .,q, :D :CD :C) :C) o :(5 N :C) C) 0 0 ct 8I .... 1(5- 23 13 � 0 , :0 o :(5 :C) C5 Lfi 6 c; VET..'3- 5 :5 0 o :O :(5 P :� 0 0 0) -Fo CL ( CD 0 co CO .0- < a 0 U) 0 > 0- c D 0 VA cu 0 �p 0) > 0 0 0 c = 0 0 -0 0 0 0 CL X o ry 0 > M D- 73 -F > W CL (1) -a A I •N M ,O O 00 w a v° M O d p i O O O ;0 ............ ,O ) vO vO OR 00 i ,O ® CK) 00 ea n N m Q O 00 Q) J o . tm O t C) v ,o .o N - •o •o O N J O Q M J O O J O M O O : o �t :Cl : 7' ] O V m M M 1 .O .O t0 J •O 'O O °O O •O J • O O W a7 O :O N J • O • OJ M V' j O O ] O O °p tMD ID O ] :C, h d O •O N M _fl •O O O MO a) ] •O •� O O :o :m <Y :I- ] C. .a ti o ° N ai ] °° •� C 00 Q •O N V O O N vO •0 Y ,O •O 00 d' L V � O a 0 N `�'• N V 71 _ ] C � is C ,% .> > fA tC O .�2 : •O .0 co .......... O O :m C, a :p : 0 Lo 0 m ............... o D 83 § 'O ---- A.....%.... 04 0 o D •0 cl 3) 3) 0 O :�2 0 :O ---------- N •O -0 •O :0 .......... :0 :0 0 O � 6 C) N :Cl .......... :0 C'4 0 0) 0 (0 O CD a 0 CL CD L. a. W 7 eN N f eO eM O 0 l e0 .O O 0 N N O N N 'N N ' r °O O j e0 e0 O r rr 0 .)n u) J .c eco � 0 r ) .o j o 'Cl N 'N N ..........r..... J p e I J O O <D N N J 'O O J O .m J 0 O . rwNm ] .O .O O �� � O ] e0 . Ile M M J o N ] e0 .O O ] O O O ] 'O •O O ] o O ] e0 'N O N ] .O .O O �� O O .......... 7 O N N ] 'O ] O O 'O °N O N ] ] O O M p O M O O ] O m p N O O (V N ] o v v ] o m 7 O N aJ N . ++ co ] o 'm O O M ] O s0 M O 0 O O 0 ] 'O 'O O ] e0 •W � e0 •O 00 O '3 O :O O L v N U o L :> w I ° N N O Op O U 'N o :O N °N fV N N O N Z O 'O e0 O ,O e0 O O .0 A ----- k ----- N O N CO O O CO O (D :11 + O O N N N N 7 N U V) O p 0 O m O N Z N .N ....... CN 0 � e e m ,n _ N ,� w M CP o .0 em O . O e co O .O eV 4 n O ,O ,O o 'o '0 O 0 O 'O 'O M ' O M (6 L 2 0 00 O - p O O O w a o .o e_• b . N O OY Ste. O O O O N O O a y 0 :3 p 0 e N d p p X CL ul O e O r um L a LO O ) 0 M O O O O � LO O � LO LO ,V N , e e o O O 'O °CO 00 M O ® x co 'O :O O z 'O 0 . O O :Cl V 0 O O OM M o O O 0 co Cl N e e a d 0 rn 43 66 1 1 U �+ e ] o o to ] o i o v a °N N 3 'O > .O •O O .M M J . O • t0 [O ] .O •O O J .o °N N ............... M M ] O °t0 0 to J 0 °O O ] O V 7 ] 'O e ,(N N J J ] 0 0 O _ .p t0 J J 0 0 O O O O J °p N G O O p O p J ....74.....5.... O 0 Oct p O OR J . a J a) O Q) O O O Cf t0 J . .O O ] ] •O •t0 O N Ep N ] i .O .N o0 O N O M M O p F- p J ,O ] ° O •(0 t0 J ] O M °O •N 'O •N M N N J ] 'O 'd W ] ] 'O 'O M 'O O 0 O M O O ] O o p W O i O :N tV ] O 0 t0 J O N N . . a e- ] o v a U) ] O e I- ] o 7 :0 e 0 C O ] ] 'O 'N 'O N N N ] ] O . .O O Ci O O ] :O :O O y, + O U P a0 a� O O -4- O : : (00 0 C) 0 ,O aN :(N 0 w 0 O J a0 ---------- :cl a0 O M co r- C, O :0 C=; :0 C, :CD :(N 'ci :Cl ---------- : 0 N .0 'a, 0 Ci 0 `05 LO N C .2 0 tdi m N CO N )M e0 V M O N N 1 N 'N M M ,:O O ) e°o V N eM 'r O ) M e(0 ` R O °N 'N M M ...........�..... M r O a co A n t— J i e0 eN M ,N M a :I- :O r J ] � .o eo n 0 i •o •0 0 ] O O O ] N M , N O a 0 ] e n Of : i ] a Mo ;0 e° m ] i o .0 :00 '0 0 0 ] h O 'O 1-. N ] ] M M •O <f N e 0 M e0 M co O e0 ] N a ] ] M O 'O •N Cl) N ] ° M :N M ....A.....4... ] V o] 'N M OD e� e r ] ,M O N J M N = O � e0 e0 D F+ D 0 O M O O O b e e V O ;D `o 0 fC e e � .......... .......... -------- .... .......... ............... .......... ............... .0M : : co, .......... :0 M :0 C, Lo cl ---------- O .6 ............ W c •t5 > I r_ 0 0 0 LO oi .M 'O 'N > p r --------------- l .O 'O 'N ............... .O ep ) 'O :N ) .tn •V > O O i O O N N ] 0M .� M O O O :L O ) e(O 0 ] M ] M O) ] .m N ] O O 'O O ] O O .(MO O p N N d © O O O O O p0 O O ..... A.....'..... Qi Q O 'p 'O (0 Cl) o o s .. d `- t: .. ... 'v 'r� C Opo Z i o ;: ;o 00 O o .o .0 0 Q ........... O_ 'v co V O .O 'O r L � � U +� c °c Y R a Gi O O (Q Cl) t� 0 c 0 id 2 0 co oi :4 ........... p :a, (31 .......... .......... ............... C\l D :,t :,;r D C\l rl- D m D D N D O co D 0 D p O 0 D :m ............... D :(,4 O D .0 .0 D .0 •O ---------- ca 0) L :> I N O .O N O O .10 N c0 O U o .o .ro C; 00 O ' ' ' N Z � e C O O o M O 'O 0 M o 'o .m of ------------ % N O R O O •R C) O O co M ' F- � r o O v U a_ °p ° ° Z CN O U m N O .O Q : O .O .O O °o N :: 'o 'O0 ° ° ° O '. N c a _ Vi uV o . o r O O �, O O .. V O O O 'O LL O O •. O o............. °o oo c0 fl ''. . ...0 • � o °o o °p � ...• X . p O O p O O O a V o o sn Y w •�. o o '' n o ' o n n tt 0 o a m CN O o O O 'O ' O p M O O o O :N ..... A..... R.... cV . . � o 'o 'n n io • : o N .O :w O cN0 Y O O a� O I C14 N 0 0 0 0 0 CN w N Iq :Cd 00 0 N 04 Z Z ----------- C> C! C� -0 0 :ai a; CV O .......... :(D •-,r ' O '0 00 ,CO w IONI ................ 04 ................ 0 0 2 0 :W M "i 39 to M m 0 ................ 0 N"i C> M jr m :C) C) :0 C, M C, 0 M X a. LU C� Cli CV 0 :0 U) CL LL :0 04 O C11 _R .0 .......... 0 C, C, •0 00 C) 0 x LLI cu M .0 .0) CL LL C; : C5 Of 0 M 0 M 00 C/3 B V 0 C,4 N 0 0 C. C) M Cl) t, 0 C! ° m a! ----------------- w co Ox 0 z o 0 .......... :r- v- N F- 0 N N 0 O 0 .(D ID x IM 4) 0 M I 1 o ''v a ,O M M O N d p p M 'O O M a 'O eN N 0 M ) v0 vp 0 M co O M p M ,M M M O ) ,p ,O ,N N O M M J .o > ,o 'O 'tn ) 'O O C > 'O 'O LO a O ........... ,p N p ,O V d O J O O p o o p n o o" ] ° r ai ............... m ] 'O °o c o 0 � J 'O 'v17 129 ] O O " N ............... ] O W co ] O O ] 'O 'N O N = o U rP. O Y � -4- s 0 --------------- C, p C, •0) .......... :C) C, C, O m0 ............... :C' mN c), S c C, 0 O 0 o •C! o C) 0 C, N :0 m0 ................ O Ci CD 7 m0 m0 ---------- • ea 4a CL I �lr .0 0 cc a) ®_ ce N A cl; "D i 6 Y mV O O I C'4 j to J C\l 3 03 mM :(D C'j I.- 3 r_ 0 E 0 E E U) Ci le a 0 A- m E 0 CL CL • U- ll� 14t a) c ui -Fu C) 0 O rah Ld I M 'O C') C, 01 C, 0 6 tr 3 co of 1 oo r :114, co 3 'c .......... 0 co :(D D co C� W M C) IJ Ca m a W E c Lo D. 'Owl -4- (D 0 ca (D cu z -E 0 a) .N N O .O vO .(O =ct N n . ' ....y.... ........... :...y.... o AN O v Ol ] .0 N 2 . .o i ;o _. ;o 7 N V M v i d O N O O J cY C:3 �Y � O v v t¢ ; e N .fl . . . W ... .. Z O .................... N ; co .. J J �ti � -1 tN o O O O O .,.'''.O N O M fJ O O OtrN o o O O to 7 N N X G O vtrN A M O O 'O 'M 'N O O co i O .O .O d a tL O CO o o 'o 'ri 'o .m .O xa- '. to . co .O .W .N O . O . W . O ] 'M LU A.: : O 'O 'M 'O A O_ Ua , ] ] �N �r• .-0 ] ,N d .V , .M �� V =� 0 v J ;,D a� In I ] M 0 Z M O ] ,O :O :O asssxxsses � a¢aas'a ■¢¢araaassnexxa is o ;a� .chi .� N '... Q .0 ;� C� co o ........... o O� 0 :0 04 0 0 :(0 •0, •.0 .0 •(0 ........... 0 m 0 C, :0 :n O O O C) 0 m 0 co C\l O O O ----------- ........... D .0 (o •0 C n N c, N� c C! .0. •C! :3 CC, nN C� •0 •O --------------------- :C, co • 8� :C � 0 a : N� ----------- RC3 :(o O C! •o :10 :OR o 0, N w m :E CL = LU o 2 0 C) 1- ca O O L- E W U) t. E 0 0 M 0 .0 m Lm O 0 0 0 0 U- LL LL EL Lu 0 0 0 0 M 00 0 W tFS Cd U) a) O O O 0 0 tC CL MEE= Cal Land EhgInEiiating, IhO. d Consultarft d,, _ Jcal, E04frohr6&M, and CWA 00 First Commercial Sii&�OtA 200 E. Main Street Aftmbra, California 91801 Attention- W j6timw Panq Based on re�rd*d i6lbortatibrij it is cohdUdW OW ftre is foiW pb*UW a noq�agrjcu� ha�us Matetials P*Ont in tie "tow lkl�ftoe $& M66ona! assessrnent Is riot r600rnMended at ft lim. Any Mure dev*p*ht such Q�s O*nga t" of the fadlityi or use off ft grou�� shoWd be rW� b� an 4)00«� • environmental Ooswba W& appreciate tws opporulnity to be of serviteii ShWd you haVd any qoestions pertaining W ft tooft Please call the under*ood. #4 Fill ;11 M. �"I , M w MR 11 IN I M, iwm- HUMM�, M�&MIMIM-1141 1.0 INTRODUCTION N........RfOr.. N ....................................................... m ... R.4 -0. 00 ................ 0........ r... 1 1.1 SITE I�.00AnoN ........................r............. r............................................... ............................... 1 1.2 PURPOSE ........ — ....................................................................... m.............. ..............................1 1.3 SCOPE OF W ................... . ............................... . ........... ... p... Y............. ..............................1 2.5 SITE CONDITION ............li .............. P.. m...... r.......r............................ a. NP.a gfi....yµRlq }!!.........gr..r.r 3.5 HISTORICAL DOCUMENT ..!!.!!..!l.. N.. y} aaY... Nr............fP ........... ..N...........................2 011 une"i`av1 AAA r% RcY81�.YY ........................................... .............................................................. !« 3.2 DEPARTMENT OF ILOING ANO SAFETY, CITY OF BALDWIN PARK PUBLIC WORKS ................... 2 3.3 CITY biRECToRy ..• ..............•....................m......•..•...................... ............................... 2 4.'i , AL GEOLOGY a -yili' Oi.OGY...awf }iaa..f.Rf. Bm Nfq.fy. gffgf'l ygif }ffb..... oi } } } } } } } } } }..6+i.4mmm m }m...A 4.1 SOtLd C: EOLLoGy. m ..................• m.m••....•....•.. m...•••..•.. m. m.•.. m. m•.......... Y... m........ m.. ..........................••..4 4,2 G RO UNDwATeR....• m••....... Y .......................•.•...••..... m• m..•...•............ Y• Y... Y.... ...••.•......................•. 4 5.5 OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL CtC X+IC 1 1 tY!} iPN. yfO. gabtff} ObsfR}}►} M}} i}}}}!}}}.}.. •..........••.•.......bµ.m }}Y.m 5.1 ASBESTOS ................................................................................................ o ........................... 6.2 RADON OCCURRENCE . ....... m ....................•.•. m...••. mm. mm•....YYt.YY... Y. Y. Y. Y.......•.. ...•...•....................Y.. 5 6.0 GOVERNMENT RECORDS H..t............. 0Y................••. f}. ....................... ... }}q } }m.....•.. 5 6.1 NPL. ............................................................. .� .•.....•. Y...... Y.. Y...YtY........•...• •.•....•....................... �/5yry 6.2 CA SI f EQ......•••.......•.... m• m•..•.•..•.......•..... m.. m.... m.....••..•.•.... m. m ... .............•................. I............. 6 6.3 CHMIR p ..................................•m.. m......•...........b m........ m.....•...........•...•• ....•.••..•m.•..•••...•....•... 6.4 CORTESE.. m ................ m.............. t•• mm. m....................•.... m•••.•. m••..•........ Y.... ..........•••............••.... 6 6.5 LUST .m m.•..•• ..............•................ m...............••...••.............•....•• m...........m.... ...m...............•........... 7 6.6 UST .• . m.. m .........................................•...........................m. m.....••........••• ...•.m......................... 7 6.7 HAZNET ..................................... Y.......•..........•......•..........................•....•. ...•.........................7 7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................... N........................ N. }q 7" 7.1 CONCLUSIONS ........................•....•..•...•• m••.•..•. m.. m........•.••.•.•....•. m•.....•........ ..•...........•..........•.•.7 7.2 RECOMMENDATIONS m..•.....•.. m...........•...•........•..• .................................•.... I ..........................•...6 6.0 LIMITATION .........lNIOP!!gP ►! q.µ... Y.YYY....Y YNeyygy. yygfyyyyyP!ll qyPl ql iYPN.lI ........... NO ........ gyygllf ...............6 0.0 REFERENCE ............ ....................... N.............Y...... N..... N............. RtRl R}l P... ..............................6 iRIV11:41 n } 1 ii: ten__. n •. q •. y .. Page I of 8 First Commercial Bank (U&t., March 26. 2008 CLE Project No.: 0"174)02ESA I.Q. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Site Locaflon This report presents a summary of our Limited Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for the property. The propertys address is 13M Merced. .Avenue, Baldwin Park, California subject pro ...... 1.2 Purpose The purpose of this assessment is to review existing environmental conditions, and to evaluate -isw*mm c!;+= rfijA in nrpmant and historical onsite. 1.3 Scope of Work The following limited scopes of work were conducted for this environmental assessment: i. Perform a site reconnaissance at the subject property and its adjacent properties to observe current land usage and existing operations; wastes handling and discharge procedures; if any, and potential releases and presence of hazardous substances. 2. Review of available historical information of the subject property and its surrounding area to assess part uses that may contribute to potential environmental impacts. 3. Review available informabon of regional geology and hydrogeology literatures regarding underlying geologic conditions and groundwater regime in the vicinity of the subject property. 4. Review of available Calffomia State and US Federal databases to determine if leaking underground storage tanks, hazardous waste generators, Superfund sites, landfills, end other documented hazardous releases may have existed within approximately 1 mile of the subject property. 5. Preparation of this report to include a finding summary of this assessment and its conclusions, and recommendations for further investigations. 576 E. Lambert Road, Brea, Califomia 92621; Tel. 114-671-1050; Fax: 714-671-1090 _.: First .. 2008 =- • HISTORICAL DOCUMENT these strucum were available. 3.2 Dgparbmrrt of + and SaW, City Of "dwin Park Publte Works :t .3 cr _ • f BaklWn Work's en• Building PerTnit Department - ;.+ :mss st + r^ :• E 3.3 My Directory Busirtess directories were reviewed at eppro)dmately five yeare Intervals for the year spannInQ 1920 through 2006. The following table presents a summary of ft reviewed directory Year Usee Source ch Source c Angeles Directory Co. IAMSA a' .. • • :.+ -: w- •..t t- a:' s. -. is _ • Pap 4 of 8 Fbst 'COMmercW Bank (USA) MarCh 26. 2008 CLJ� PTlect,No.- 0"174MESA . ........ LlVLNG HOPE BAPTIST CHURCH (13940) 1986 Address Not Listed In Research Source Psdfic Bell 1990 Address Not Listed In Research Source Pacific Bell 1991 Address Not Listed in Research Source 1996 "MERCED AVE** LJ\flNG HOPE BAPTIST CHURCH (I 39Q) LIVING HOPE BAPTIST CHURCH (13940) LIVING IN LIGHTING BY GRIFF WILLIAMS (1 390) ELEMENTARY SCHEOL (139 3) FROM IA CREACENTA TELEPHONES CALL (139 0) 1996 Address Not Listed in Research Source 1999 Address Not Listed In Research Source 2000 Address Not Listed in Research Source 2001 Address Not Listed in Research Source 2003 "MERCED AVE** MIDVLY SCHOOL (13940) 2064 Address Not Listed In Research Source 2006 Address Not Listed In Research Source 4.0 AREA GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY t'.1 soilla400gy i gm- -ga*�V b AkW deposits Of alkMW f8ns, plains, and terraces in the 4.2 Groundwater it is antidpated that the groundwater of the area Is aPPrO)dm3t8lY 38-40 feet beiow the eAstng ground surf:a6e in accordance with CDMG Open File Report 98,13. page 6 of a First Commercial Barak (USA) March 26, 2008 CLE Project No.: 0"17- 002E.SA 5.0 OTHER EmVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS SA Asbestos Asbestos-containing materials (ACM) s used in many ccammercisl products since early this century. its use had peaked in the period between World War ll and the 1970s. However, based can nted f rmation obtained from manufacturers represe by the Us Consumer Product Safety information Cornmission, it is unlikely that asbestos - containing materials v�ere commercially used since late 1970s. The site is currently occupied by one story corrrmerciallindustrial building. Available records indicated that the existing building was constructed during g65•% potential of the cresence Of ,.�.� a donnn ACM should be evaluated prior to any building co& ,.,tr=ul. 5-.2-Radon Occurrence Radon is a naturally - occurring radioacctivve gas. It can not be seen, smelled, or tasted and is the in high product of the natural radioactive decay of uranium. Radon is found most frequently 9 concentrations In soils and rocks containing uranium, granite, steal ®, phosphate, and pitchblende. types of industrial waste, such as Radon may also be found in soils that are contamina waste. si�rrtsaun in by Boll deposits of alluvial byproducts of uranium nium car phosphate mining iains, and terraces of the Los Angeles Basin, it is CLE's opinion that the. potential of high. fans, p _� ton, at the site is.Mrr�ot6 . c�lrlck�i its c4uw: r —,.,don occurring 6.0 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCH A government records search conducted for the subject site. The records search was conducted sources, Inc. (EDR) to identify potentially located tentially contaminated Environmental Data Re .within one -mile radius of the referenced site. Based on ASTM E1527-05, the one-mile radius was selected as the magnum distance that existing contamination might migrate or transport to the project site. Results of the government records search are provides# in Appendix A which lists the entire recorded contaminated site. A brief discussion of the contaminated, sites is also presented below, as based on information provided by EDR. ... 6.1 NPL Under the US Federal EPA's CERCLA program (also known as the Superfund Program), EPA will identify and compile a list of all potential hazardous substances release sites (CERCLIS). Once on CERCLIS, the site will be assessed by the EPA, or appropriate state agencies, to determine necessary actions to be taken, if any. The inclusion of a site in the CERLCIS list does not necessarily confirm that the'site prises a significant health or environmental threat. Once a site 576 E. Lambert Road, Brea, California 92821; Tel: 714- 671 -1050; fax: 71 71 -090 A review of the Cal-Sitee llet revealed thet there ere no c"Ites located within 1 mile of the T-7=1 - = 0.3 CHMIRS of re rted The California Hazardous Meterial Inciftnt Relport system contains information Po hazardous material Incidents, such ee eccidental spills or releases. ThO source Is the Calilomil office* of Emergency Services. The record seerch Indicates that there ere no CHMIRS sites The source is the Cailfomia EPA. The recad search indicetes that there ere no CORTESE sites r� �aa w r' .• i`f. 6.T HAZNET by This database is extracted from the copies of �azardorus waste menifests received asch Year typically fi #l1 fii fit annually, i volume ■ } ..if ■ - Data ere from the manifests submitted without correcoon. r -; many contain some Invalid e r - r r` as generetor revealed that there are :TWD Or, WaStO category. & disposal method. A review of this detabase no HAZNET sftes within miles of the subject property. 1 f I . • f 7.1 Conclualons on information collected during this essessmant and are Subject The subjed property is occupied by a Christian School, (BaldvAn Park Chrietan School, Mid Velley Leaming Ctrs.. Inc.). No evidenCe of under ground r: above ground storage 'i _ _ ■14..: ■. Page 8 of r-jrd CommereW 0841 FI i »,a a = # K - - the government databases. 4. 'Other listed rftes are W lft�y to pose significant environmental concerns on Ift stiblect 1.2 Rommmendations Addigo"I assessmW is not recommOnded at this tima. Any future davelopment, such as change � a 1 Ma 8.0 UWATIONS 9.0 REFERENCE Environmental " ). for s r . Real Estate. Includw _ : f 1. - 1 i' 1 576 E. Lambert Road, Brea, Callforrila 92621; Tel- 714-671-1050; F= 714-671-1090 The E DR Radius Map GeoCheco Phase I Environmental 13940 Merced Avenue Baldwin Park, CA 91706 Inquiry Number: 2172181.2s March 19, 2008 .- PAGE _ SECTION ESt ExocutivaSumnmua�-_..--~_-__-__-_--__---_-,-_-'_--,__ -~_________ 2 {�omrw&�vMap �---______-___~________~~~~~_________ _-_-~~-~--___-_--_-- Daba8ma�'-----------~~--------~~------ __-____~__.~__--___ ` 4 ` -~~_--- Map Findings Smmmm�r�.-------__--__-___--_--_____-___ _-__~ --_- Mop Findings --------------------------------------------- ------------- ------- 26 Orphan Summary --------------------------------------------------- m����m����m�r��e�/�at��urnon��TracuoQ� -_-----�~~_~-_r=__�_,�_�_� ��o«�nmn�� _ _ ` � ���.� ' GEOCHECK ADDENDUM physical Setting SosnrmA6daodumm_--------_-___--__-_-________-__-_______ _ �~� ' _ ' ___ �n �on�mm��� _______________ Physical Setting u��m -__-__-______________ Ar2 �-� — physical Setting Source nMZP �-_-----_-_--___-_-_-__--__--__---_-_-_ ------_-- _ Physical Setting Source Map Findings ---------------------------------------- A-9 Physical Setting Source Records Searched ------------------------------------ ' Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at with any questions orcomments. ` ' This Report WnWns c;ertain Information obtained frorn a vWjety of public and other sourves reasonably available to Environmental Date Resources, Inc. It =Wt be conduded frorn this ReW that cO OEVqZ M CONN 5CTION WffH T2SARISWITIe'RONMENTAL DATA RESOURCr=S, INC. SPECIFIC-ALLY DISCLAMS THE MAXV13 OF At4y SUCH WARRAWM' OlUr. VE14AT OTHER CAUSE. FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE INCLUDINO, Wn ACCIDEW OR ANY OF EWWtONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, WC. IS STPJMY ConssaueMkt. OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGM ANY UABILITY ON THE PART Report 'AS IS'. Any analyses, estirnates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk code$ provided in this Report are provided for Riustrative purposes ooty, and ate not Intended to provide, nor should they be IntOrPr8W as PrO'Adiing any facts reg�rdlng, w pradiction or fogacast of, any env4onmental risk W any property. Only a Phase 1, EnwironmentaJ SIte AsSassmert performed by an environments] Mlas6c)nsl can provide Inforulation rogarding the a�vjtonrnanlal risk for any property, Additinnatly the WOnnaWn PrOMed In oils Report Is not to be construed as fegal advice. CopAht 2008 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc, AR rights reserved Reproduction in any media. or formet, In whole or in part of any report or rnap of ElMronmenW Data Resou=s, Im, or Its aNiates, is prohibited without prior wriften permission. F -darnaft of Environmental Data Resou=3, I nc. or its affiliates. All other OR and Its logos (Including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are tr. �ertv of their respective EXECUTIVE SUMMARI A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR). The report was designed to assist parUes seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 3112), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-05) or custom reqUiraments.developed for the evaluation.of environmental risk associated with a pa.malof real.estAle.- TARGET PROPERTY -INFORMA'PON ADDRESS 13940 MERCED AVENUE BALDWIN PARK, CA 91.706 COORDINATES Latitude (North): 34.079270 - 34* 4' 45X' Longitude (West), 117,970490 -117`68'13-07 Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 11 UTM X (Meters): 410457.1 UTM Y (meters): 3771175-5 Elevation' 351 k above sea level USGSTOPOnizapHlift MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY Target Property map: 341'17 -A8 BALpWIN PARK, CA Most Recent Revision, 1981 TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR, VffH NO MAPP DATABASES WITH N MAPPM 5ITE�11 No mapped sites were found in EDR'a search of available (*reasonably ascertainabfe government records either on the target propertyx within the search. radius around the target property forthe. following databases: AL RECORDS FE�DER Proposed NPL -------------- Proposed National Priority List $has Delisted NFL---------- -- - - -. National Priority List Deletions NPL LIENS - -- -_ - -_ --- Federal superfund Liens CERC-NFRAP. --------------- CERCLIS No Further Remedial Acton Planned LIENS 2- -- ---- --- ------ - - - - -- CERCLA Lien Information CORRACTS --- Corrective Action Report e and Disposal RCRA-TSDF ----------------- RCRA - Transporters, Storage RCRA-LOG ----------------- - RCRA - Large Quanfity Generators RCRA- SAG-------- -- -- - - - --- --------- RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRA-CE-SqG, ... RCRA - CondillonallY 9xeMO SmAll Q anfity. Generator TC21721812% EXECUnVE SUMCARY 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RCRA-MonGOn ---- --------- US INST CONTROL ____ _... RCRA -Pion Ganeratats Sites with instftdonal Controls Emergency Response Notification System ERNS. ------ ­­ --------- __. Hazardous Materials information Reporting System HMIRS_ -------- ----------- DOT OPS -------------- Incident and Accident Data US CI)L___ ------ ­ ------ Clandestine Drug Labs us sROWNFIELDS -------- _ A Listing of Brownfields Sites DOD—_ ­ ----- Department of Defense Sites ------------- FUDS_---------- ----- ---- -- Formerly Used Defense Sites LUGS_----- ------ Land Use Control Information System ._.. ... CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees ------------------- --- Uranium Mill Tailings Sites, ODL --------- I -------- .- open Dump Inventory Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations DEBi�_iiiiGION 9a_-- _ -__ - -. Mines Master Index File MINES_-_ ........ Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System TRIS ..... _ .... -------- ..- _TSCk_ .............. .-----Toxic Substances Control Act - nsicide, RodenlJdde FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fuj FTTS .. __ ............ .____.FIFRAJTSCATracIdngSys1iem ActyTSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) FIFRAITSCA Tracking System Administrative C ase Usting HjST MS ...... ...... .......... . Section 7 Tracking Systems ICIS _ ------------ Integrated Compliance InformatiOn"SYstem .......... FADS_,. ­­­­ PC8 Activity Database System - ..... .. ... IV10C . ­ ­ --------------- Material Ucensing TrackIn System Radiation Information Database RADIWj& --- .1__­__­ -- Facility Index SysterniFacility Registry System FINDS.._.._________________ - -. inistrative Actin Tracking. System RCRA Adm o p AATS. ...................... ..STATE AND LocAl. RECORDS HIST Cal-Shas --------------- Historical Calsits-S Database CA BOND EXP. PLAK--.,., Bond Expenditure Plan BCH __ ---- School Property Evaluation Program ------------ Toxic pits _ -------- Jc Pits C leanup Act SftS& Toy ......... SWF/LF ------ --------------- Solid Waste Information System ..CAWIGS---------- ----- - - - --- Waste D'scbarge System VVWUDS1SWAT_____ -------- Waste Management Unit Database - Cortese` Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List codsse­­ ­ ------ Geotracker's Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Report LUST_.__....___.....- ._..__ CA FID UST -------------- Facility Inventory Database SLIC.— ---------- _ ------- Statewide SLIC Cases Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities AST________________ __ ____ _ __ ------- Environmental Clews listing California Hazardous Material Indderit Report System CHMIRS ---- — ------------ __ Notify BS.--- --- --- --- -- - -- - -- Proposition 65 Records LA Co. Site Mlfl9atJ0n­­---- Site Mitigation Ust OFED ............ ....... __ Dead Restriction Listing Properties voluntary Cleanup Program .......... VCp_ ............ .. . DRYCLF.ANERS_ -------- .-- Cleaner Facilities LOS ANGELES CO. HMS_. -. HMS' Street Numbar List CDC.._._-- --- ----------- --- - -- Clandestine Drug Labs RESPONSE. .... ..... .. ...... State Response Sites HAZNET --_----_---­ Facility and Manifest Data AJRS Emissions Inventory Data ------------------ HAULERS--, ----------- Regis Wgistq Tire Haulers 1­1$09 TG2172181.20 EXECUTfViE SUMMARY 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TRIBAL RECORDS INDIAN RESERV,...._____._w. Indian Reservations INDIAN Oi3L ........ ...... Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands . INDIAN LUST_.. ___..... _r. Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land INDIAN UST.. -------- Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EDH pROPMETARY RECC RD$ Mantdractured Gas Plants,— EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plan.% 17R Historical Cleaners -- EDR rrapn y riiAtprip, SURROUNDING SITES. SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites Were Identified in the following databases. Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentsated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property. Page numbers and map identifications number& refer to the EDR Radius .Map. rspgr# .ushers detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold Italics are in multiple databases. Unmappable (orphan) sites, are not considered in the foregoing analysis. FEDERAL RECORDS NPL: Also known as Superfund, the National Priority List database is a subset of CERCLIS and Identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund program. The source of this database is the U.S. EPA. A review of the NPL list, as provided by EDR, and dated 0113112005 has revealed that there is l NPL site within approximately 1 mile of the.target property. Equafffther Elevation Addre" mist I Dir Map 10 Page SAN GAI RIE>' VALLEY J=Y (,4REA 2) SUNSET � 5,41 BERNARL INO 114 T 1/2 ESE tt CERCLIS: The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and liability Act (CERCLA), CERCLIS contains sites which are ether proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPQ and sites which are in the screening and assessment phasic. for possible Inclusion on the NPs.. A review of the CERCLIS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 0110912.00d, has.revealed that there its I CERCLIS site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. 1= quailHighar Elevation Address$ Dist I fair Map ICS Page SAN GABRIEL. VALLEY(ARE4, 2}....... SUNSET 4 SAN BERNARDINO 114 ESE 0 � TC2172181 ?a EXECUTT E SUM MlAPY 3 US FING CONTROLS: A listing of Sites with engineering cOnU018 In place- A review of the US ENG CONTROLS list as provided by EDR, and dated 01/1812008 has revealed that there Is I US ENG CONTROLS site within approximately o.5 miles of the target property. EqualfHlghor ElevatJon Address Dist I Dir Map ID Page sAAt GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 2) SUNSET & SAN BERNARDINO 114 - 112ESE 0 6 ROD: Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and he alth information to aid the cleanup. A review of the ROD list, as provided by EDR, and dated 011141200$ has revealed that there is I ROD site Within approximately I mile of the larget.propertY. EqualtHigher Elevation Address Dist I Dir map 110 Page SAN aAama VALLEY (AREA 2) SUNSET & SAN BERNARD11VO 114 - 112ESE 0 6 ELI D— LOCAL RECORDS SWRCY- A llstlng of recycling facilities in California. A review of the SWRCY list, as provided by EDR, and dated 0110712008 has revealed that there Is I SWRCY site within approximately 0.5 miles.of the target property. EquaVfther Elevation Addre" DW. I Dir Map 1D Page HABITAT RECYCLINGIVALUE PLUS M 14103 RAMONA BLVD 1/4 - 112NNE. 7 21 .area where voC contamination is at or above the MCL as designated by region 9 epa office. ..A review of the AOCONCERN list as provided by EDR, and dated 1213111998 has revealed that there is 1 AOCONCERN site within appro)Orqate)y I mile of the target PtOPOrty- Equal/Higher Elevation Address Dist I Dir Map ID Page SAN GABRIEL VALLEY 0-1/8 0 6 UST. The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered LISTS. USTs are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The data come from the State Water Resources Coritrol Board's Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database. A review of the UST list, as provided by EDR and dated 0 1107t2OO8 has revealed that there is 1 UST site within approximately 0..Z5 miles of the target property. EqualfflIgher Elevation Address Dist I Dir Map ID Page -MCLAMREN TEXACO .3648 BALDWIN PARK. BLVD 0-1/8 S B5 20 7C2172181.2s EXECLMVE SUMMARY 4 MIST UBT- Historical UST Registered Database. A review of the HtST UST fist, as provided by EDR, and doted 10/151IOW has revealed !fret there is 1 HIST UST st#e within approximately 0.26 mites of ft target property. EquaUHIgherMovwdon � Address DW / Dir� Map ID P"a ROBIN OIL CO t9`2tt 3646 8ALDWZN PARfC aL VD 0-1/8 S 84 98 �.�`.$v a�vT: Stu- 'i.+�iid °a c�..r"i i- i�i.riuiui9ioi E�oi � #1 �C7W �/�J`i9fi173&� �id3. ixi3t$ 416i'�d$r$FC7{j(� $ UWn.� Raft was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SW'RCB in Etta warty 199t1`a. The fisft is no longer updated or malnWned. The local agency is me contact for more irtbrmalba on a wife on the SWEEPS A taviow of the SWEEPS LEST iist, as provided by EDR, and 116/0119994 has revealed that VWM is i SWEEPS UST site wfWn approxximately 025 miles of the target property. EqualiNighor Elevation Address DW I Dlr map tiff Page ROBIN O L CO #20 3648 BALifWN PAW BLVD 0-1/8 s B4 is WfP: Well Investigation Program case In the San Gabriet and San Fernando valley area. A review of the WIP list, as provided by EDR and dated 1it1251 Wr has revealed that there is 9 Wip site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property, Lower Elsvattort Address LOW t' ur Map tO Peso SI~RGICYS MOBILE AUTO REPAIR 3W5 BALDWIN PARK BLVD 918 - 114 88W a 21 EKVfi2+D &TOR: Do partment of Toxio Subshances Cantn>1'a {DTSC`s }Site Min and BrowMtalds Reuse Program'$ iSMBItP's} ErrrlroStcr da#ettasa ldantlfas eltes that have known tntamlrtatttart Of aifea fret vvhioh there may be reasons to investigate fur#har. The database includes the following wife types: Fe�darei Stiperhrnd sites (l+laticrrtal Priflritias fiat (NPL. } }; Stet$ Raspcnsa, {nt tiling Mttitary Facilities and State Superfund; Volry Cleanup; and Sro~taal sites. 1= riviru.Star provides s{rrriiar infarrrtafton the irtfarntatton that was available in CalSites, and prcv%Eas addltionai site Information, Including, but not limited to, fdentificatior# of formerly - contaminated properties that have been released f,ar rouse, properties whom environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent Inappropriate tsnd ueas, and risk ctarac tarUat%n inforrnadon that is used to assess potential Impacts to public health and the enviyonrnent et contaminated saes. A review of the ENVIROSTOR fist, as pmvWed by EDR, and dated 111271s?{DO7 has revealed that there are 2 ENVIRDSTOR sites within approximately 1 mite of the target property. EqualiNigher Elevalton Address DW I Dlr Map ID Pago LUCKY ONE-HOUR CLEANER 4138 N. MADE AVE. 112 -1 NE 9 25 Facility Stag; Refer. 1248 Loml Agency LowerElevadon Address Dist 1 Dlr !Nap ID Page SWJW VISTA HIGH SCHOOL 360 NORTH FRAZIER STRE *2_1 "We 21 FaOty Sbda: No Futtrw Act Ei F EXECUTIVE SUMMAR Y EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS EDR Historical Auto Stations: ED has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station filing stzWordservice station shes tot were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources that might, In EDF:Vs opinion, Include gas stagonlfilling station)sarvice station establishmantL The categories reviewed Included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, 'service station, ate. A review of the EDR Historica€ Auto Stations list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 3 EDR Historical Auto Stations sites within approximately 0.25 muss of the target' propedly. Equa€Nigher Etevation Address Mist 1 DIr Map IM Page FRANK'S ASSOCIATED SERVICE 3707 N BALDWIN PARK B€ V g - 118 ESE Al 17 FRANK *$ FLYING A SERVICE 3707 N BAL13WIN PARK 0 - 118 ESE A2 i8 BILLS SIGNAL SERVICE 3648 N SALDWIN. PARK. 51-V 01 118 S B3 18 TC2172981.0 EXECUTIVE $UMMARY 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Due to poor or inadequate address lnfonnaUon, the fbiloMng sites were not mapped. $Re Name Database (s) UNITED ROCK PRODUCTS CORP LOS ANGELES CO. HMS, SWEEPS UST FORMER V I P CLEANERS DRYCLEANERS IX MCKESSON DRUG CO HAZNET, LUST, CHMIRS HAROLD SIMPSON D.S. SWFILF SAN MARINO CITY DUMP SWFILF NIGROICIAN, JOHN WMUDSISWAT VARTHERINE, THEO. LARWINDALE WMUDSISWAT INRNITE PHOTO LAB HAZNET, WIP CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION RCRA-SQG, FINDS SAN GABRIEL GROUND WATER BASIN 2 CA BOND EXP.. PLAN. BOCK MACHINE INC. WIP VAN ASCII INC, WIP V I P CLEANER$, SOKYV PAK, DBA, ........... .......... AtFtS TC2172i8i -2a EXECLMVE SUMMARY 7 DETAIL MAP - 2172181.2s — — — -------- --oo Target Property Sites at alevat= higher than F77J� Indan Reservations BIA Co"IC*m or equal to the target property • Sites at elevations towel than Oil & Cas pipelines t-w target property r 100 .Year 1100d =no Manufacturad Gas Plants 5w-year.ficw X" Sensitive Receptors Naficnal Prk)rity List Sitar pept Defense S EMS This report includes Interactive Map Layers to display and/or hide map IftfatMaMR la brtllc includes only those icons default map view. CUENT; Cal Laid Eriglneedng NAME: Phase I ErMronmntal CONTACT: Abe Kazemzadeh DRESS: 13940 Merced Avenue INQUIRY #: 2172181.2S vAn Park CA 9176 13aU 0 DATE: March 19,2W8 3:55 Pm LONG: 34.07931117-970-5 !QW EM j,, c =7 T,111 M" F6L 07MOS, TC2172181-2s Page 4 Search Total Target Distance (mites) 118 1/6-1/4 1 C4 -112 112-1 Plotted Database Property FEDERAL RECOPDS 0 0 0 NP, NR 0 .NPL Proposed NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Delisted NPL 1,000 TP 0 NR NR NR NR NR 0 Npl- UrENS 1 NIA NR I CERCLIS 0.500 0 U 0 0 NR NR .0 CERC-NFRAP 0 �500 TP 0 NR NR NR NR NR 0 LIENS 2 1.000 0 0 0 0 ..NR 0 CORRACTS 0.5w 0 0 0 NR NR 0 RCR---TSDF RCRA-LQG 0.250 0 ri NR NR NR NR A-4R NR .0 0 RCRA-SQG 0250 0-25D 0 0 0 0 NR NR NR 0 RCRA-CESQG TP NR NR NR NR NR RCRA-NonGen 0.500 0 0 1 NR. NR US ENG CONTROLS 0 0 0 NR US INST CONTROL 0.500 TP NR NR NR NR NR ERNS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 0 EMI TP NR NR NR NR 0 DOT OPS TP NR NR NR NR NR US CDL 0.500 0 o NR NR .0 0 US BROWNFIELPS 0 .0 0 0 o NR DOD 1.000 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 FUD $ LUCIS' tO 0 - U - 1. NR NR NR CONSENT 0 0 NR ROD (3.500 0 0 NR NR 0 0 UMTRA ...0.500 .0 .0 0 NR NR 0 ODI DEBRIS REGION 9 0.500 0 0 0 0 0 NR NR NR MINES -0,250 N NR R NR HR NR 0 TRIS TP NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0 T SCA TP NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0 HIST FTTS TP NR N8 NR NR NR 0 SSTS TP NR NR NR NR NR NR 0 0 IC18 PADS TIP NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR .0 MLTS TP TP NR N NR NR NR 0 0 RADINFO TP NR NR NR NR NR FINDS TP NR. NR NR RAATS STATE AND LOCAL RECORDS HIST Gal -Sites -.1.000 0 .0 NR 0 CA BOND EXP. PLAN o NR NR NR 0 SCH ()_25() NR 0 Toxic Pits, 0.5Do NR NR TC2172181-2s Page 4 WAP FINDINGS SUMMARY- '(C217218 i -2s Pa98 5 Search Total Target property Distance (Miles) < 118 118-114 114-1/2 112-1 >1 Plotted Database CA WDS TP NR NR 0 NR 0 NR NR NR -NR 'D 0 WMUDSISWAT, 0.500 0 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Cortese 0.500 0.500 0 0 1 NR I SWIRCY 0,5m 0 0 0 Ni; NR 0 LUST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 CA FID UST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR SLIC 0 NR AOCONCERN 3.000 0,250 NR NR NR LIST 0.250 NR NR NR 0 HIST UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 AST Ll�Ns TIP No 1, NR 0 NR NR NR NR NR NR ..I . . . SWEEPS UST 0.250 TP NR NR NR NR NR . 0— CHMIRS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR O Notify 65 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 LA Co- Sjrje MAIgation 01500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 ..DEED VCP 0.600 0 0 0 0 NR NR NR NR .0 DRYCiwElstlERS 0.260 0 0 1 NP NR NR VIP LOS ANGELES, CO-. HMS_ 0-250 TP NR NR NR NR NR NR ..NR NR 0 ..CDL TP NR 0 NR 0 0 0 NR '0 RESPONSE TP NR NR .NR NR NR HAZNET TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 AIRS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 2. 'HAULERS 1,000 0 0. 2 NRI ENVIROSTOR TR18ALPX=C101Pw0S INDIAN RESERV 0 .0 0 D 0 0 NR NR NR 0 0 INDIAN ODI 0.5w 0 0 0 o .., NR .0 INDIAN LUST NR NR 0. ..INDIAN UST rz0R PROPRIETARY R5CORD8 Manufacture d Gas Plants 1,000 0 ' 0 NR NR NR NR 0 3 EDR HistorlcW Auto Stations 025[) 3 NR NR NR 0 EDR Historical Cleaners 0.250 NOTES: TP = Target Property ...... NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance ...... Sites may ay he. listed in more than one database. ...... .... .......... '(C217218 i -2s Pa98 5 I pill, 1077 CERCU$ Site Contact Nam(a): C*rftd Name: Contact Tot CorxW Title: Cu#14 Name, Contact Tot Contact Tft: Contact Mama: Contact let 6nfast me. Contact Nalm. Contact Tet Contact Title: CERCUS Site Alfas Hame(sY Wayne Prealitne (416) 972-3101 Remedial Project Manager (RPM) Down Rk*fn*W (415) On-Mr SU AssessmM Mwmtw MW Mail mugumd (415) 67243M Site Assessment Manager (SAM) NLqu M=IZ (05) 972-Mil Site Amwasment Manager (SAM) Ages Narnw. SAN GABRIEL VALLEY AOCONCERM CCAOOMM IM Not reported Alias Runs: WA I ft; LOS ANGELES (Countjfh CA SAIDWIN PARK CA 91708 Alias Mang: AOCONCERN: Alas Address: SUNSET & SAN BERNARDIM0 FREEWAY WW whom VOC cmUunkatba is at or above the MCL as desipated by region 0 EPA office Site Dmcdpdow. NPL CERCLIS IOM141#5I SAN GABRML VALLEY (AREA 2) Region BUNM A 9AN BERNARDINO FREEWAY FINDS CADISMI8512 ESE BALMMN PARK. CA 91706 mm underfl" most of the San Gatdel Valley Basin, stores an estkuded area 19-112 — - ROD BasIn7a mkfents. Ma)or smfew water fevWm h ft San GabrM Valley Is" It. Inc tude the San GabrW Rim. Mulattos to the SarGabrM PJvw system, and us ENO CONTROLS spreadbW bastna kKaW in or adjacetri to the river clumml0he appro4nefe, CERCLIS: SM ux 090M Federal Facility: Not a Federal Facility NPL Status: Cumft on the Final NPL Nora NPL Stubm. Not reported CERCU$ Site Contact Nam(a): C*rftd Name: Contact Tot CorxW Title: Cu#14 Name, Contact Tot Contact Tft: Contact Mama: Contact let 6nfast me. Contact Nalm. Contact Tet Contact Title: CERCUS Site Alfas Hame(sY Wayne Prealitne (416) 972-3101 Remedial Project Manager (RPM) Down Rk*fn*W (415) On-Mr SU AssessmM Mwmtw MW Mail mugumd (415) 67243M Site Assessment Manager (SAM) NLqu M=IZ (05) 972-Mil Site Amwasment Manager (SAM) Ages Narnw. BALDWIN PARK A. as Addrem Not mported Not reported Alias Runs: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 2) Alias Address: SUNS" & SN BERNARDINO FRWY SAIDWIN PARK CA 91708 Alias Mang: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 2) Alas Address: SUNSET & SAN BERNARDIM0 FREEWAY BALDWIN PARK AREA, CA 01706 Site Dmcdpdow. Four areas Of WW=Matw omtw1*mMon are lisled an the Nations! Pdoriges list: San Gab" VaIlary Area 1, San GaWal Vaney Area 2, San Galxfgl VWby 3, and San Gabdal Valley 4. The trio' areas m*ftsmt a ftnifkant portka of the 170 scium mils San Gabriel Valley In Los Angebe C&mty. C;affmtkL Mose than one mOm residents M In ft Sacs Qbr1*I Vafty alongside a variety of cornmerdW and Industrial operations. The San Gabriel Aquifer, which underfl" most of the San Gatdel Valley Basin, stores an estkuded area tom gallons of Water WW to the pm" source of water for most of the BasIn7a mkfents. Ma)or smfew water fevWm h ft San GabrM Valley Inc tude the San GabrW Rim. Mulattos to the SarGabrM PJvw system, and spreadbW bastna kKaW in or adjacetri to the river clumml0he appro4nefe, TC217216`126 Page 8 MAP FINDINGS map ID _ EDR ID Number Dlr� EPA 10 Number Distance Elevation Site ioDO114961 SAN GABRIEL. VALL" (AREA 2) (Continued), 1=tjon of the San Gabriel Valley Area 2 Site is West of highway 39, south of he San Gabriel Mountains, east Of the San Gabriel River, and north Of Walnut Creek. Needy all of the 881dwin Park area is fully developed for residential, commercial, and industrial use. The Wgasi pads of open imW are acOve, and inactive gravel pits and the Santa Fe ftc4 Control Basin, Water purvey= of Ansa. Caff=ls D=Ostk- Wale' in the site area Include: the City Water Distr� San Gab" Company, City of GteWofa, La Puente V06y County ~y Water Valley Water Company, -5ut)urbart QYQW '-' concern at DWyjctVotatH8 organic compounds (VoCs), maw contaminants of the San Gabriel VafleY Sites, were used in large quantities at industrial facilities as early as the 1940?,,. From the IM73 through this 1980?6, mrbon tetrachloride, totrachlomethane, and other dilorinated used by hundreds of W31ness" for degreasEng� as TaL" mlatej solvents were u miew extra�ns' and for automotive products, by a savant racycW, for che for Other purposes. VOCS have beats released by acombinatiOn of intentional disposal, caralssa handling during loading and unk*dhg, Isaidng tanks and pipes, and other means. VOCS Ware not detected In ground w@tw until 1979 during envirortmentaf moriftorkV advitles conducted by Aer*t Elachtsystsms in Azusa.ln May I W, EPA fistfid four areas of contamination near Its faculty ware listed as San GaWel Valley Area began Its enforcement a J through R. evaluatios of efforts In the site area in 1985 with searches for and historical Federal, state. and tonal records on Chan-dcal usagen, handling, er�d disposal. In 1985, the Cafftnla Regional Watst Quality Board began Its Well 'On Program (wip) to Identify the sources of ground water Investigation supply waft. in 1389, EPA entered Into a contamination detected in water d the Wip program to datamnlnO Me natUffe and cooperative agreement to expen Gabriel Valley, The RWS for the Baldwin extent of contamination in he San identlfication efforts� as a Park OU was conducted cone, trendy wilt} -W= fund4aad projocL in Marrh 1994, Via Record Olt Decision: (ROD) 4?mment was signed. nt History. CERCLIS Assessment Action, DISCOVERY Date Started: Not repotted Date Completed: .04101119130 Priority Level, Not reported Action: ISSUE REQUEST LETTERS 004E) Date Started'. Not reported Date Completed: Priority Level: Not reported PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT, Acticon: Data Started, Not reported Date Completed: Priority Level: High Action: SITE INSPECTION Date Started. Date Completed: M01/1983 Priority Level. High Action: HAZARD RANKING SySTEM.PACKAGE Date Started. ....... Not reported Date Compteted: 0910111983 Priority Level' Not reported Action, PROPOSAL TO NA'nONAL PRIORITIES LIST TC2172iS12s Page ISSUE FEWEST LETTERS (104E) Not reported 0IM111984 MA ra COMMUNITY INVOLVEMEW 05mills" owilmou , Not reporw AdJon: FML LISTING ON NATKKAL PRIORMES LIST Date SuMed: Not mpwW Date C4MWhKi: o5m8u Pfkx* Levet Ftot reported Actka: ISSUE REQUEST LETTERS (104E) Dow Started: Not report d DoW C4w4ftfed: 1z' 988 Pdoft Level: NO nwoftd Acdm: Date StarWd. Nedco tatters Issued W reported Date C*Ovfeted-. MWM"D Pft* Leve• Not repwlad AcftL bate Started: Nodw LGftQm Issued Not reported Mate Cmqftje4t OMMOD PrkR#Y Level., Not rspwted Acdon- DOW Slated: Date Co oete& Nkirw Levet AcftL Date sbrba& Date canpletm& No ft Levat Action Date Started: Date Can~. Pft* Levet Acdow Date Skulact Date compteted, Pfb* Levak ISSUE REQUEST LETTMs oo4E) Not mpodad ostoam9go Not mpww Notice Letters Issued Md mpartad 07/M990 Not Mpoded N04CO LCUOM Issued Not MPWbd 09rAM990 Not repwtad 1000114901 TC21721812a peoe 8 SAID GASRIEL V 2) ( 10MI4961 Priority Levat trust mportod Acdw: Nonce Letters tsstued Dais Started: Not reported Dane Corrq teted: 12lta611M priority Lavet: Nast sport d Acrr'a t t.ettara tee Late Started: Not reported Date IM711"D t evet Notraported Acdw: Data Std Notice Letters tote Not reported Data ttPJt /1991 Prtottttr tevetr Not reported AcCom .Dante Slatted: Notice Let= Issued Not mp xw Date Completed: 031Er611991 ftk tat Levet Not reported Adlo Noiece Letters Esrstred Dats Started: Not repotted Date Completad: 071tt9J1991 Pk&y Lova ?'last reported AcUm, Date Stashed Notice Lagers limsed Not reported Bete Completed: 0M I991 Ptiartty Lover: Not reported Actions: ALrtMINISTATASIVOLEINTARY COST RECOVERY Date Started: "repotted Date C,omplatasd: M9W1991 PeW tty Lent Not reported Actt= REMOVAL ASSESSMENT Bate started: 12J2Tf1991 teats Completed: 12t27f1991 Priority Levee Not reported Actim RCSKMEALTH ASSESSMENT Date Started: Not reported Date Corrsplated: ti911t3 I= RloMy Lent Not repotted Acdor: ECOLOGMAL RISK ASSESSMENT Date started: Not reported Data Completed: OW1611992 Priority Level: Not reported Actfon: SpecW Notice Issued Date Siartad: Not raport$d Date CClttrptete& o8t2lihm Prtc * t.evet Not reported TC217218123 PSW 9 }tap 10 MAP FiPtDINGS Direction EDR ID Number pistons EPA 10 Plumber Elevation Site SAN GAERIEL VALLEY (AREA 2) (Con?Jnuad) 10001114961 Action: Norma L atisrs issued Date Started: Not reputed "Date completed:. ti81tkt11993 Priority level: Not reported Action: Notice Letters Issued Date Started: Not reported Date completed. Ct8Pi71t933 Priority Level-, - Not rc� ed . Action, Specdal "ce Issued Date Started: Not reported Date Completed; i12 [3?l1994 Priority Level: Not reported Anion: RECORD OF DECISION Date Started: Not repotted Data Completed; 0313111994 Priority Level: Not reported Y Action: COMBINED REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY ST IDY Data Started: p8101ii987 Date Completed: 0313111994 Priority Level: Not sported NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST RESPONSIBLE PARTY SEARCH Action: Date Started: 091`3ti iS64 Date Completed: 0710111994 Priority Level: Not repotted NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST PMSPQNS.1I3. E PAR'T'Y SEARCH An ion: Date Started: Cs113011988 Date Completed* D7101119994 Priority Level: Not reported Action: Notice Letters Issued Date Started: Not reported pate Completed: CteMI994 prix City Level. Not reported Actfon: Nodca letters Issued Date Started: Not reported Date Completed: D -011311995 Priority Levet: Not raparted .... Action: Notice Letters Issued [)ate Started: Not reported Bate Completed. 04/2011995 Priority Levat; Not reported Action: Nottcs Letters issued pate Started: Not raputed pa #a Cotnpteted:. 05/0511995 Priority Level: hot reported Notice Letters Issued Date Started: Not reported TC21721812s Page 10 Map ID MAP FrNvmw Difection Db&ncs EWvaWn Site EDR 10 Nwytber Defshase(s) EPA 11) Nurraw SAW GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 2) (Conflnuacq 10MI'14961 Data Completed' cahaI1995 Priority Levet Not reported Ac0m: ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER ON CONSENT DOW startedt Not reported Date CoMpIeted: OW13tlgW PA)" Levet Not repoded AcftL RSIMEOIAL OESIGNIREMEDIAL ACTION NEGOTIATIONS Date Started: W1611997 Data Cerroeted: oarjarwo Priordy Lavok Not teported Action: UNILATERAL ADMIN OMER Date Suww: Not rapated Date C4n%p1&tiW: OWWAM Priority L&M: Nat reported AcdM' P07ENTLALLY RESPONSIBLE PARTY REMEDIAL OESIGN Da!4 Stoned; 07121f.WW Date C"Apisfixt Not reported Priority Lava. W Mpaded A40=1 ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER ON CONSENT Date Skulad: Not reported lats Coftlpkled. 09)26r 40i ?'Ik*W Levet FAA reported AGOm: PROSPECMVE PURCHASER AGREEMENT ASSESSMENT Date Stoned. 06106 2m Date Corripsetmt 0=5mi Prieft Levvk I PPA Signed Acdm- Lofted By DOJ Date Stoned: MA reported Date Carstpletad-. "Ila= Priority Levet Not reported Act= ALIFJMTIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION Date Started: 07XIMM Date Completed: owir2m Priority Levet Not reported Acbm CONSENT DECREE Date Starbedt 01101r4m Date Completed O=r2m Primly Levet Not reported Action: POTENTIALLY RESPONSIBLE PARTY REMEDIAL ACTION Date SUded- =26=M irate Completed: Not reported Prkxtty Levet Not reported Action: POTENTIALLY RESPONSIBLE PARTY REMEDLAL DESIGN Date started: 07=2" Date Cornpleted. osmmw Pdonty Levet Not reported TC21721812s Page 11 %I An r-163nikjf-�Q Map ID _ DirKlion EDR 10 Number Distanrs Databases) EPA I€] Number Elevation Site SAM GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 2) (Continued) 10001 14 .1 Action: POTENTIALLY RESPONSIBLE PARTY REMEDIAL DESIGN Date Starw: 07P2112000 Date O npleteti: 03131!2003 PNarity Levet: Not reporter Action: POTENTIALLY RESPONSIBLE PARTY REMEDIAL DESIGN. Date Started: 07121r2400 Date Completed: 0a10812003 pl - ll , LP f t: Not iiano ied Action. OPERATIONS AND MiAINTENANCE t late Started: 09MI2003 Date Completed: Not reported Priority Level:. Matra ports Action: OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Date Started: 06!3012003 Date Completed: Not reported Priority Level: Not reported poTENT ALLY RESPONSIBLE PARTY REMEDIAL ACTION Action. Date Started: 09126/2002 Data Completed: 0913012003 Priority Level, Interim RA Report POTENTIALLY RE8P.C7hE51I3LE PARTY LONG -TERM RESPONSE ACTION " Action: Date Started: 09130d'2003 gate Completed: Not reported Prlohly Laval: Not reported Aim: POTENTIALLY RESPONSIBLE PARTY REMEDIAL, DESIGN Date Started: 0712112000 Crate Completed: 0912912044 Priority Level: Not reported Action: OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Date Started: 09=12004 Date Completed. Not reported Priority Leval: Not reported Action: POTENTIALLY RESPONSIBLE PARTY REMEDIAL ACTION. Date Started: 0313112003 Date Completed: 09130rdfih Priority Level: Interim RA Report Action: CLAIM IN BANKRUPTCY PRQCEEDING Date started: R31i 412005 Date Completed: 03/14/2005 Priority Level: Not reported Action: pOTENTiALLY RESPONSIBLE PARTY REMEDIAL ACTION Date Started: 0810$12003 Bate Completed: 0313111405 Priority Level: Interim RA Report _.... ......... Action: .... ............................... OPERATIONSAND.MA€ TENANCE Data Started: 0313112445 TC21721612s Page 12 I Map ID MAP FMOM Dbscdm DWtance EDR ID NUmber Elavation wSft s) EPA tD Number SAN CaABRIEL VALLE Date Umplsted: Priority Level: Adton: Date Started: Data Comptated: Pdor#y Levet: Actium Dater Stetted: Date gamptated: Priority Lever:. Action: Data Started: Data Cornpteted: Priority Lem: Action; Date Started Dena cQm pkaed: Prtg V Lever Action: Dale Started: Cate Complete& Priority tevet Aitkn Data Starr Data Completed: Priority Lever "W Date Started: DOW Completed: P*W4 Lever Adkon: Dim Surted: Date Completed: Prior Leysr .4CUM Data Started: Date Completed: Priory Lever Action: Dee $terted: Data Completed; Prbrity Level: AcUm. Data Started: Date Completed: Priority Lever Ef EMMA 2) (Conitnued) 1 11 1 Rd reported Not reported Lodged BY DOJ Briar reported Not reported Lo4GO.. C T i Not reported 10126rdOOS Not reported Lodged BY DOJ Not reported IOrA 12M Not rspottsd todged By DW Not repotted 1iir== Not reported Lodged By DOJ Not reported 10MMOM Fiat reported Lodged By DOJ Not reported 10t2612 OS Not reported Lodger! By DO;J Not reported 1M60M Not reported Lodged By DOJ Not reported 16126l2tw Not reported SETTLEMENT (GENEFJC) Not rerported 11I011J.t M Not reported CONSENT DECREE tt9F2OS 12112/2005 Not reported CONSENT DECREE MUMS Not reported T021721812s Page 13 } map MAP FINEIIPM IR DbecUm ED R 0 Number Distaftce Da s) EPA 10 Number Elevation SU SAN GAWUEL VALLEY VXEA 2) (Continued) Action: CONSENTMREE Date Started 090at2005 De% Campleted: 12AW200 Prkx Not reported Data started Date Complated; Acdon: Data Started: DateComplsle& Priority Le"t Actkxx Dew OWW, Dow compietod: Pdaft Level: 6w. Elate Started: Mts Completed: PdWity Level: Acdon: Data swrted; Da%COMPWW: Priority Level: Action' Date started: Date Completed: PrIo* Level: Action: Date Staged: Data Completed: Prbft LaV4W' AcOwL Date Started: Date Completed: Pftft LWAC Action: Data staruxt Data Completed: Priority Level: Uwdw4A= 12=21)0 Not reported CONSENTDECREE o9r2&*M I2_13=05 Not reported CONSENT DECREE 09=42M 12/14r2M Not reported CONSENT DECREE OSMW2005 12/16J 20W Not reported OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE 0=1142M lint reported Not reported POTENTIALLY RESPOWSLE PARTY REMEDIAL ACTION 0$=404 095=1006 Ent nkn RA Report CDNSENT DECREE 03rArAM 0344007 Not reported toted By DOJ Not reported 06madw Not reported FIVE-YEAR REVIEW owir2w 09WMOT Not reported FINDS: Other penjnwa Envirorinwntid Adk* Wentilled at We CERCUS (CoMPreWMs&0 Enwwawtel ReVmm, Ca n, and LMft Irdwnut;on system) is the rfund daWbass Owt Is uwd to support management In a phawe of ft Superfund p"ram The TC21721812s Page 14. El SAN GABRIEL VALLEY CMEA 2) ntrwe* SyStlam mdd(CoM [nWM*m on 82 aspects of hszonfous W80W sba, btdudbV an bmnkq of sRes. pianned end adual sM actlyffies, and ffrg=W Infamotim CADOMISS12 09 N 05MI984 Cutang on 0* FbW NPL Dep#s To Aquftr--- 1d Foot I NPL Status t Cuman0y on the Fine! NPL C,-Aog=y Desc4ftrr Dkftm To Hearst PopWdon-,v 0 And ca 1/4 Mae CAWOM vak► 10 SAN AN GABRIEL VALIEY (AREA 2) FInW 91708 BALDMIN PARK ^A NO LOS ANGELES 09 091003 Not mpmW 05mw Substance Deb0s: Nl�'L SWts Cummtly an the FkW NPL Subsumo 10. Not reputed Substance: Not mpmW CAS M Not reported Pat mw- Not mpmw Sowhv. W mportad NPL Status* CurmnW on the FhW NPL Subabutce ID: L1210 Substance: TETRACHLOROETHENE CAS #* 127-164 pagmay. GROUND WATER PATHWAY Scarinw. 2 NPL. Status: CwMflfy an Me FUW NPL Substance ID: L1211 Subm CARIM TETRACHLORIDE CAS * 6843-5 Pathway; GROUND WATER PATMAY sooting: 4 fflilllr�� T02172181-95 Page 15 2 100C. RM, =-1 - NPLStab= curendy on the Find NPL SLtx*mca ID: U228 Substance' TFUCHLOROEIWYLENE (TCE) CAS #.* 79-01-6 Putwer. GROUND WATER PAThWAY ScxtnT 2 Summary Details: CQWWM gt usft September !W# Sm GubddlVaey Area 2j W 3 AM OW the So GaW River to to west In the San sue u): pwnd WaW paraWs Gabriel Spomd water buin In the MW PC* area of-Los Angeles Cog*, Name: CvgWnla. The plume Is about 7.5 M&K WV Ond 1.5 miles ***- Address: Gr=,d water In contagnInated with UktiogOOMI&M TCE). papWopoeftileno PCEJ and carbon t0M=MWM0- ac=dkV to b and EPA Region: kxM water comparjw, many pAft web In the am exceed the EPA qty; Suggested No Adverse Response LeveIs SNARL) for TCE and PCE. Approxhlet* 100.000 people are affede& CHIM and WW Water 00MPan*5 11 the 0188 Everd Code: have tested to wum that their *afar 61UPPI100 MftWOm d*A 5 Pasta Per Acb;W Data: Man ppb) of TCE, a Wd owwWared =%fior W= owwmpdon. Wren a man madbods of M&,dgV the TCE Wieg below 6 ppb are not of dkft. ,eDs am removed from service. Stabs: jum 1984): A mppWnenW 8,mp[ft pmgmm of contaminated web wilt begh soon to GM 8 mWilsbut vkffit Of the degree of contandnadon. The 81818 DOMtrIgnt Of HGaM 8w, k*l and EPA SM VMPWhV to Mate a MMOM IMB*OW fe=t"y shuly to detumflne the earial and vmtcW extent of MVIOM&Mbo" and to d"810P WW=thm for ftstpent and of the pvblam EPA conftm" Its jnv5ft8kr to werttf,, amnneg of cwwn*wdm This site, I along with the ftwctw SO* Gabriel Way dftk W83 added to ft NPL In " IM became, ft bTWm a serba problem OW required 121ft lm� Mma" aclion. Detalls: NPL Stub= Final Pmposed Data: 09108tI983 Final Date: U&MIOM Deleted Daft. Not reported NaM*j" Details: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY (AREA 2) NPL Nam: BALDWIN PARK W. State: CA ROD, Fua4eA of USEPA Record of 09dgw(g) Is avzM$O from EDF� EPA 10: CAD9MI8512 sue u): 0902092 Name: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY ViAEA 2) Address: SUNSET & SAN sERNARDINO FREEWAY BALDWIN PARK CA 91706 EPA Region: 09 qty; LOS ANGELES Everd Code: Not MPOfted Acb;W Data: Not reported FPIK-Isr- L-4 TC217218128 Pegs 18 TC217218i-2s Page 17 MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction EDR ID Number Distance DatabaseN EPA 10 Number Eteyaf4n Site .......... SAN GA13FUEL VALLEY (,AREA 2) (Continued) Action 0: 001 Action Name: RECORD OF DECISION., Action Completion date: 0=11199A planned Complet. date. Not TePOrtsd Operable Unit 01 ConjaMnated Media Groundwater -,Enginfiefing COntfol: Air Stripping Ac 10'. 00i Action Name: RECORD OF DECISION Action Completion date- D=1/1994 Planned GomPlet date: Not reported operable Unit; 01 Contaminated Media - Engineering Control; DIS;dh2rg0 Action ID: 001 Action Name: RECORD OF DECISION Action Completion date'. 0313111994 Planted Complet. date: Not reported operable Unit 01 Contaminated Media: Groundwater Engineering COntmt'- liquid Phase Carbon AdsorpWn Action ID-. 001 Action Name: RECORD OF DECISION Action completion date: 0=1'4n 1994 Planned ComplaL data: Not reported Operable Unit: 01 contaminated mac Ra. Groundwater Engineering Control; Monitoring Action 10: 001 Action Name: RECORD OF DEQIS'jCN. Action completion date: 0=111994 Planned Complet. date. Not reported operubla Unit contaminated Media, Groundwater Engineering Control: pump And Treat EDR filAtpricalAuto StaltiOns 1008994508 Al FRANWS ASSOCIATED SERVICE WA - ESE 3TQ/ N SALt)wlN PARK BLVD BALDmN PARK, CA 81706 0.041 mL 214 it Site I of 2 In cluster A Relative' EDR Historical Auto $tatiOns- FRANK'S ASSOCIATED SERVICE HIgher Nam: Year 1955 Actual: _TYPO* Not reported .. ........ 352 ft. Name: FRANK'S. ASSOCIATED SERVICE Year 1955 Type: Not reported TC217218i-2s Page 17 El MAP FINDINGS Map ID DhKOD" F-DR a Number obtance EPA try Nundw sevation WA 83 BILL'S SIGNAL SERVICE - Contairm Nion: South 3SU N &ALWIN PARK BLVD .c 1d6 - , ELA&_nM PA-M CA 91704 00010000 O.On ml. PRODUCT Type of Fow: 370 ft. afte I of 3 In du*W 8 Not reported Leak Detectim EDR �IbWrlcal Auto Sts Relative: Eq%w Nam: HUB CITY SERVICE STATION Year: Im Aclu;ml :Type: Not reported 251 ft Nam: mus crry SERVICE STAMN Year. lm Type. Not repoewd S4 scum ,c Ifil O.On mL 379 fL r-T;171 F-91; Nam BILL'S WHAL SERVICE Year: lgis Type: Not reponed ROBIN OIL 00 820 $$a B=WIN PARK BLVD SALOM PAIK CA S► 2 of 3 In cluster 8 MIST Us"r PaY ICY. F&cW Type: 0dWTYpe: Total Tarft Caftd Nam: Telephone: owm Name: ow6erAftm: Owrw cftjfst.s�. p: STATE 041000006313 Gas station Not reported 0004 TONY BRISTOL slawims JOHN E. DEWnT, Sk P.O. Box 3867 SOUTH EL MONTF- CA 91733 Tank Nwm 001 Contairm Nion: I Year hIShWAXV Not repoftd TankCapaW. 00010000 Tw* Used for PRODUCT Type of Fow: PREMIUM Tank Ccn*ucWm Not reported Leak Detectim Stock InverAm Tank Nwm ow TC21721812s Page 18 t:; "C w a 5, contalw Nlow. Year hsbdkKt Tank Capacity: Tank Used for. Typo of ": Tank CwoWuctl0n: Leak Dabndw: TO-filke Mum conw[rw Nw"t Year hftKod: Tank Capow. Tank Used kc Type of Fuet Tank CortstucO= Leak Detac3= Tw* Num CwWw Nwn: Year k*Uffled: ** capaw. Tank Used for Type of FWA: Taf* Cvnobucftn' Lea Deteefion: ............. . ■ 003 3 Not reporW 00010M PRODUCT REGULAR Not rq)oow StM& kwetvbx RWE—pps UST: staww ownp Nwnwr Number Board Of EqARwdw: Rat Data: Act DaW. Created Oda: Tank Stahm owner Tank kt Swnb Tw* Id: Actv Date: CADRCW. To* UM. stg: cvthmt Nurr(tw Of Tw*&' stab= Comp Number. Number. Bawd Of EqW&GUM Ref DOW. Act Date: Created Date, Tankfthts Owner Tiu* kt Swrob Tank Id: Actv Date.' capacKy. Tank Use: a Map ID ili�p FWW'Os DWOCUO EDR ID Number Dkftwe Da s) EPA [D Number Ekwtbn She ROMM OIL CO120 (CMUMM"O UOOI568799 Stw w Content Not reported Number Of TeAW Not reported Met= A comp Nuatban. 11184 Number a Board of Equalmson: as-OW S4 RafDaw 064V49 Ad DOW: Not mpoded created Date: 06-30-W T" Status. A Owrw Tank Id: W repodod Swmb Tsak W 1 1 1944)COOW AdvDdw 06-30-89 Gape *r. Not reparled Tank Mal. LWKNOWN Stg: w content: Not reported xwrbw Of Tanks: I Not rep*rwd Statute A ConV Umber II184 Number a Board Of Equabnow. 44-009I54 Ref Date: 06 —V439 Act Data: wMporw Created Date: 06-3"S Tank Sftb= A Owner Tank Id: Not mported Swab junk W 19.000-011W-� AcIv Data: 05410-69 capa&r. Not reported Tank Use: UNV40WN Stg,. w Content: wreported Number Ot Tanks: Not reported $51 fl. TC2172i$128 Page 20 a Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction EDR ID Number I]istanCe Databases) EPA ID Number Elevation Site 6 SERGIO'S MOBILE AUTO REPAIR V�iP 51087659 8 , . SSW 3M BALDVflN PARK BLVD i18 -118 BALDWIN PAR#{. CA 91705 0,197 m €, 1041 ft Retative: WIP: Ldwer Region: 4 File Number: 108.1145 Actual: File Status: Not fspottes€ htc tY ..1+F0 iia 11111tt CliTiC7C!'i SUBM, ViY1LfGl1 Facility Suite: Not reported RAB€TAT REGYCLINGIVAi uE PLUS MICTI SWRL'Y Sits713Z983. NNE 14103 RAMONA BLVD NIA 114 -112 BALDWIN PA€2€4, CA 91705 OA68 m €. 2456 ft Relative; SWRCY: Higher Certification Status: L3 Facility Phone Humber (310) 650 -7443 Actual: Bata facility became certified: 0211f3104 365 it. Date facility began operating: 03108104 Date facility ceased operating: Stiff operating Whether The Facility Is Grandfathered: Not reported C,nverrience 7nne Where Facittiy Located: 1080 Convenience Zone tlarltem Facility Located 2: 1081 Convenience Zane Where Facility Located 3: 1084 Convenience Zone Where Facility Located 4: 3853 Convenience Zone Where Faciliiy Located 5: 0 Convenience Zone Where Facility Located 8: 0 Convenienca Zane Where Faattly Located 7: 0 Alurritnum (3averaga containers Redeemed: AL Class Beverage Conntainera Redeemed: GL Pleat€c Beverage Containers Redeemed: PL other m+at beverage containers redeemed: Not reported Refitiable Beverage containers Redeemed: Not reported $ SIERRA VISTA HIGH SCHOOL SCH 5.1057: 4240 WSW 3600 NORTH FRAZIER STREET EAiviRi75fEii2 NIA 11:2.1 BALDWIN PARK, CA 81706 0.608 ml. 3212 fi Ralative: Lowor SCH: Facility 10: 19820088 Site Type: school Investigation Actual: Site Type Detail: School 331 ft. Acres: 3 National Priorities Ust: 1101 cleanup Oversight Agencies: $MBRP Lead Agency; SMBRP Lead Agency Description: Not reported Project Manager. Not reported Supervisor. Javier Hlnojosa Division Branch: Sto€ Evaluation - Glendale I sacrarnerdQ Site Cade: 3M96-11 TC21721812s Page 21 s s .1". slERRA VISTA MON SCHOOL (Comet MM4 Asserntdy: 67 Senats: 24 Special pm ram stags: Nast statuw No FuFUW Action Status l;iate: 2003.05'24 fleabicted tdse. NO FurldlnT SdKKI OhMd Lahre: 34.07137 Lonsaidw. .917 980133 BALDWIN PARK UNIFIM SCHOOL DISTRICT Alias NamS: 19820M 91 Std VISTA NIGN SC HWL M2 -011-M $ALDMN PAI3K USd- SEERRA VISTA NiGN SCNL Alters TypS: AtEetnets NO" Ernrtrostar 10 Number AilSwAft NamS Nam ,AttSnuda APN Pr*d Cade (SITS Coda) APN: 85 i"I'l -M APN De:scripgom Not reported Cammentr Not repoftd Coated Area Name: *PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area F+tlyMW. Document 1 Not repostdd � �p ��{ d �yJ ) s'i Gi�j En1o• agem nt rd dtplu l ConVkgad Date: 2i1C - 1L -23Oi WOO CompkAad Area Namir PROJECT WIDE C«anggated Sub Angie Name: W reported Corr WW Document Type: Gast Recovery C2osWA Memo Completed Date: 20M- W1800:00M Corned Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Cvrnpieted Sub Arsa Names No mported Comostod Document TypS. Errvirow*n W Ovws1gitt AWeemaid C4"vwd Data: 200- 12-10 0000:00 Completed Area Mama: PROJECT WIDE CompletedSub Area Name: flat reportad C:n npktad Document TYPO: S � Completed Deter Completed Area idaJW PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Anse Name: Not reported Completed Do urniant Type. pmftkwY EfWvM9wM1 t AwMWOM RePod Completed Date: 240346-20 00:00:00 Conramxt NONE SPEW= CooehTned Description: Ntot mpruted Ftdm Area Nattte: Not reported Future Sub Area Nerne: Not reported Future Document Type: toot reported Future Due Date: Not reported Mleft Alf+eded: SOL Media Affected Desrw sop Management Raquhed: NONE SPECIFIED Marregwwt Required Do= Not reported 30153, 30615, 39403, 30446, 30158: 30006, 305W. , 30587, Potantial: , 30164, 30007 Ptsfer Chrrarntum VI w- r St r rM rMM=-.11 , � M—FAR E U Ki M" (Gauwa gab) cqw and omapounds DOD Tahsa" DDT Venaclurn and owWOWS FwxftE, Sctwd DIWct Lath1dw. 34.0M Lor4kide: -117.9M Afts Name: BAUMN PARK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 10820M 3043WI I SIERRA VISTA HIGH SCHOOL BM-011-902 BA LDWtN PARK US"IERRA VISTA HIGH SCHL AUss-Type. Aftemale Ngm Erwkosfar ID Number Nam Aerate Alt vwta Kww APN Pr*d Code (SAO code) APW. 8SU-011-M APM Desce4ftn: Not reported commerd= Not wported C*n%pWW Ares Name: PROJECT YVIDE, Czmpkdod Sub Area None: Notrepotted Completed Dommwd Type* pmbnbwy Er4mVwwnt Assmsmant Workplan 5105754240 - ----------- map to MAP FUMING.8 DIrecow Distance SIERRA VISTA HIGH SCHOOL (CQnVrPJW* CoTvIated DOW 2002-12-23 00-OM Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Arse Name: Not reported Completed Docufneftt Type' Cod Recovery Closeout MOM Completed Date: 2003-WI8 OOM-00 Cwnp*W Arm Nam: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Nam: Not reported CompleW Dommterd Type.- Environmardal OvetslgM Agreemer4 Complaw DOW: 2002-12.iO Completed Area Name: pROJECTWIDE Corr OeW Sub Am Name: No reported Completed DocurrumtTypa: Site lnspec&waf Vod Completed Date. 2003-01-02 WOM Completed Area Norms: PROJECT WIDE C*mo*W Sub Area Name: Not reported CorNAefed Docunmt TvTw Pregmirwy EndwVsfMwd Assessmesd Report Completed Data: 200345-20 40:00-00 ConfwrdKI: NONCE SPECtRED Cowiffned Description: Not reported Fututs Area Name: Not reported Future Sub Area Nam Not reported Ktare Docurinni Type: Not reported Fuhns Due Datw. Not reported Media Affectod: SOIL Meft Affected Desk so Management Raqutredz NONE SPECIFIED _merd Penufted Do= NO reported Potential: 30163, $NIS, 3= 30406.30156.30DOO. 30=, 30008, 30567. 30154,30007 Potenital Desw#;d= chromium V1 PvWnW Descriptiort DO$Cdptj= ChMMwm vt selenium potardw Potantw Descripgom Benzene Potanw Descript1m Nk" (soluble salts) Potential DesCrIpOorn C*W end cwp=xls Poterad Dwriptlom DOD polenwoescrIpoore Toluene PoWiM DeWX0= OUT Potertitel Descriptiorc Vanndlum and =rqwids Cobalt pot=W Des*Vd= Poterft Descriptim DOE Sch,adula Area Name: Not reported SdmdWe Sub Arm Name: Not reported Sd*dWa Doctmard Type: Not reported Schedule Due Date: Not reported Sdwdtdo Revised Data: Net mp*ftd pwdjsa: • EDUCAMOWL SERVICES ,qr,TEU=i1 TC2172181.2s PsW 24 ;9 9 LUCKY ONE4i0UR. CLEANER ENMOSTOR $106797582 NE 4113$ N. MAINE AVF— WA 12.1 BALDWIN PAPA CA 91706 0.808 ML 4wfL TTTIIMMUM�" H19tw She Type: Eva&tiSt�On Sb Type Detftd: EvahAam Actual: Acm: W reported ..4 ft NPL: — NO RequWtoty Agendm NONE SPECIFIED Lead Agency. NONE SPECIFIED PmWwn Manager Not reported SuperAsor Referred -,W Asatgrwd I)Wiskm Branch: so Cal - cypress FacEfty 11). 1972=0 sun Co". Not reported Assembly: 67 Senate: 24 Sp4ow Program: Not reported Status: Refer. 1248 Local Agency States Date: 2001A)3-12 00:00:00 RestrkAod Use: NO Funding: Not Appfleable Laftide: 0 Lorotude: 0 Alias Name: 19720030 Affw Type: Emkoew 1D Number APN- NONE SPECIFIED APN Desc6ptIon, W mpoftd CQuiments: Not reported C=*ted Area Name Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Not reported Comphited Date: Not reponed C;onflrmod: NONE SPECIFIED Cordirmed Dasatpftn: W reported Future Area Nam: Not repmw Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Fuhn Documerd Tpe: Narepcirw Future Ow Date: Not mp*w Mods Affeled NONE SPECIFIED Madia Affected De= Not reported Mwwqwnerd Required: NONE SPECIFIED Mm%agemertf Requhd Desm Not reported Pokmout NONE SPECIFIED pcwnRw Dwavow. Notmpww Schedule Area Nam. Not reported Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Sdiedula Document Type: Not reported Schadula Due Date: Nut mpwW Schedule RavhM Dole: Not reported POW": NONE SPECIFIED TC2172181.2s Page 25 Appendix C: Traffic Impact Analysis August 11, 2014 Mr. Allan & Roger Lui S.C. Communities Group, LLC 2863 Maricopa Street Torrance, CA 90503 Subject: Revised TTM72195 Project Traffic Impact Analysis, City of Baldwin Park Dear Mr. Lui and Mr. Lui: TJW ENGINEERING, INC. (TJW) is pleased to present you with this revised traffic impact analysis for the proposed TTM72195 project in the City of Baldwin Park. The proposed project is located at the southwest corner of the Baldwin Park Boulevard /Merced Avenue intersection and would consist of 51 single family dwelling units on the 3.65 acre site. This traffic study has been revised to include the latest site plan, dated May 28, 2014. Since the land use quantity and site access is unchanged from the prior study, the findings of this study are identical to the original study dated November 7, 2013. This report is being submitted to you for review and forwarding to the City of Baldwin Park. Please contact us at (949) 878 -3509 if you have any questions regarding this analysis. Sincerely, Thomas Wheat, PE, TE President Registered Civil Engineer #69467 Registered Traffic Engineer #2565 Jeff Weckstein Transportation Planner 540 N. Golden Circle Dr. #104 1 Santa Ana, California 92705 1 t: (949) 878 -3509 f: (949) 878 -3593 www.tjwengineering.com TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Baldwin Park, California MTT-7771-1 M. S.C. COMMUNITIES GROUP, LLC 2863MariropaSt. Torrance, CA 90S03 sm LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS 1S2OHnnokhoUnvv Dr. Suite 33. Santa Ana, [A927O5 Prepared by: 54ON. Golden Circle Dr. #1O4 Santa Ana, California 92705 Thomas Wheat, PE, TE November 7, 201 Revised: August 11,2O14 JN:LDC-13-001 540 N. Golden Circle Dr. #104 1 Santa Ana, California 92705 1 t: (949) 878-3509 f: (949) 878-351 Section Page 1.0 Executive Summary ........................................................................................... iv 2J0Introduction ...................................................................................................... � 2.1 Study Area 1 2.� Ana)ysisMethodo/ogy J 2.3 Performance Criteria and Thresholds of Significance 3 3.0 Existing Condithonm.... ... ................................................................................... 3 3.1 Existing Study Area Conditions 3 32 Existing Traffic Volumes S 3.3 Existing Conditions Intersection Level of Service Analysis 5 z[D Proposed Project .....,....................-....~................,.....~........,......,........ G 4.1 Project Description 6 4.2 Project Trip Genenation b 43 Project Trip Distribution and Assignment 7 5J0 Existing Plus Project Conditions ~.........,~.,..,,.......,.......-.......,....~..^~.^...~.. 8 5.1 Existing Plus Project Conditions Traffic Volumes 8 5.2 Existing Plus Project Conditions Intersection Level of Service Analysis 8 6J0 Project Opening Year [2O15) Without Project Conditions........................ 9 6.1 Project Opening Year (2015) Without P jectTrafficVo|unnes 9 6.3 Project Opening Year (2015) Without P 'ectCnnditinns(ntorsoction Level of Service Analysis 9 7.0 Project Opening Year (2015)With Project Conditions ...~.................,.~.......... 10 7.1 Project Opening Year (2015) With Project Traffic Volumes lO 7.2 Project Opening Year /2015\ With Project Conditions Intersection Level of Service Analysis 10 8.0 Forecast Year 3O20 Without Project Conditions-......,.....,...................,~.,... 11 8.1 Forecast Year 20]O Without Project Traffic Volumes 11 8.2 Forecast Year 203O Without Project [ondidons|nterseciion Level of Service Analysis 11 9.0 Forecast Year 2D30With Project Conditiomm.......,...~..............,,..,...,........... 12 9.1 Forecast Year 2O30 With Project TrafficVo\unoes 12 TlVV Engineering, Inc. 9.2 Forecast Year 2O3O With Project Condhjons|ntersection Level of Service Analysis 12 11.0 PaMdng,.........,..,.....................~....~.,.~,..--....~................,.,....,...,....,......... 14 TlVV Engineering, Inc. LDC13-0O1TTK872195TIA Revised 0D-1l-2014 iiIpage Table 3: Trip Generation Rates for Proposed Project Land Uses & Existing Land Uses to be Table 4: Gross Trip Generation of Proposed Project — Vehicle Trips at Project Driveways 7 Table 5: Net New Trip Generation of Proposed Project — Vehicle Trips Distributed to Table 6: Intersection Analysis — Existing Plus Project Conditions ............................ 8 Table 7: Intersection Analvsis — Proiect Opening Year (2015) Without Project Conditions 9 Tabie 8: Intersection Analysis - Project Opening Year (2015) With Project Conditions IG, Table 9: Intersection Analysis — Forecast Year 2030 Without Project Conditions .... 11 Table 10: Intersection Analysis — Forecast Year 2030 With Project Conditions .......... 12 TlVV Engineering, Inc. LDC13-0O1TTK872195TIA Revised 0D-1l-2014 iiIpage LU-,-uUYxkilWs ...... --, ................... ................... .................... F 0 970=0 Mill Filliffliff IFIFFFII:-M-10=3m�� Appenclix Y': intersectioR-A-n-aTy—si7",Ur-Ks-ffe-e-rs-- 00roject A, T,,YYfA?M Project Conditions X—,v-PMTX7t-n — Project Conditions x7pimnTryn Mm 5IN =!, - 77 �-- Co-fditio-ms IT 1 19 F 131,113 1 � Il I I � Vll' TIM 1 111 ",1 1 1 111 1 TJW Engineering, Inc. LDC13-001 TTM72195 TIA Revised 08-11-2014 iii I page 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMART This traffic study analyzes the forecast traffic operations associated with the proposed TTM72195 project in the City of Baldwin Park. The proposed project is located at the southwest corner of the Baldwin Park Boulevard /Merced Avenue intersection and would consist of 51 single - family dwelling units on the 3.65 acre site which encompasses 13821 and 13825 Kenmore Avenue and 3625, 3637 and 3649 Baldwin Park Boulevard. The project site is currently occupied by five single family homes, a flower /gift shop, a church and a school. Site access for the proposed project is planned at one full access location on Merced Avenue. Before accounting for existing land uses on the site, the proposed project is forecast to generate approximately 39 AM peak hour trips, 51 PM peak hour trips and 486 daily trips at the project access locations. After accounting for displacement of existing land uses, the proposed project is forecast to generate approximately 35 net new AM peak hour trips, 46 net new PM peak hour trips and 438 net new daily trips. The study intersections are currently operating at an acceptable Level of Service (LOS D or better), and are forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS for existing plus project conditions. The study intersections are forecast to operate at an acceptable Level of Service (LOS D or better) for both Project Opening 'rear 2015 Without Project and Project Opening `rear 2015 With Project conditions. The study intersections are forecast to operate at an acceptable Level of Service (LOS D or better) for both Forecast Year 2030 Without Project and Forecast Year 2030 With Project conditions. Based on City of Baldwin Park thresholds of significance, the addition of project generated trips is forecast to result in no significant impacts at the study intersections for all with project scenarios. Since the project is forecast to generate approximately 35 net new AM peak hour trips and approximately 46 net new PM peak hour trips, no CMP mainline freeway monitoring location is forecast to receive 150 or more project - generated trips during either the AM peak hour or the PM peak hour. Therefore, the proposed project is forecast to have no significant CMP traffic impacts. Since the proposed project transit trips can be accommodated by existing transit service in the project vicinity, no significant CMP transit impacts are forecast to occur. Since no significant impacts are forecast to occur at the study intersections based on agency thresholds of significance, no mitigation measures are required for the proposed project. Based on the current site plan (Exhibit 4) and the City of Baldwin Park Zoning Code, the proposed project satisfies off - street parking requirements. TJW Engineering, Inc. LDC13 -001 TTM72195 TIA Revised 08 -11 -2014 ivl page This traffic study analyzes the forecast traffic operations associated with the proposed TTM72195 project in the City of Baldwin Park. The proposed project is located at the southwest corner of the Baldwin Park Boulevard /Merced Avenue intersection and would consist of 51 single fmmily dwelling units on the 3.65 acre site which encompasses 13821 and 13825 Kenmore Avenue and 3625, 3637 and 3649 Baldwin Park Boulevard. Site access for the proposed project is planned at one full access location on Merced Avenue. The project site is bound by Merced Avenue to the north, Baldwin Park Boulevard to the east, single family homes and Kenmore Avenue to the south and single family homes to the west. The project site is currently occupied by five single family homes, a flower /gift shop, a church and a school. Figure I shows the project site location. Figure 1— Project Location 2.1 STUDY AREA The following five (5) intersections in the vicinity of the project site have been included in the level of service (LOS) analysis: TJW Engineering, Inc. LDC13 -001 TTM72195 TIA Revised 08 -11 -2014 11 page • Merced Avenue (NS) at Ramona Boulevard (EW) • Baldwin Park Boulevard (NS) at Ramona Boulevard (EW) • Baldwin Park Boulevard (NS) at Merced Avenue (EW) • Baldwin Park Boulevard (NS) at Foster Avenue(EW) • Vineland Avenue (NS) at Merced Avenue (EW) This traffic analysis follows City of Baldwin Park traffic study guidelines and is consistent with the traffic impact analysis guidelines in the 2010 Los Angeles County Congestion Management Program (LA CMP). Exilhiuit Z shows the location of the .study i �tersecHons, vvhi%h are analyzed .0, the folio v "ving .�i U-y scenarios: • Existing Conditions; • Existing Plus Project Conditions; • Project Opening Year (2015) Without Project Conditions; • Project Opening Year (2015) With Project Conditions; • Forecast Year 2030 Without Project Conditions; and • Forecast Year 2030 With Project Conditions. Traffic operations are evaluated for the following time periods: • Weekday AM Peak Hour occurring within 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM; and • Weekday PM Peak Hour occurring within 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM. 2.2 ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY Level of Service (LOS) is commonly used to describe the quality of flow on roadways and at intersections using a range of LOS from LOS A (free flow with little congestion) to LOS F (severely congested conditions). The City of Baldwin Park utilizes the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) analysis methodology to calculate LOS at signalized intersections. ICU is usually expressed as a percent. The percent represents that portion of the hour required to provide sufficient capacity to accommodate all intersection traffic if all approaches operate at capacity. The resulting volume to capacity (V /C) ratio is converted to a Level of Service (LOS) as follows: TJW Engineering, Inc. LDC13 -001 TTM72195 TIA Revised 08 -11 -2014 21 page Exhibit 1: Project Location i Study LDC -13 -001 TTM72195 Traffic Impact Analysis - November 2013 Not to Scale Traffic Engineering & Transportation Planning Consultants - 540 N. Golden Circle Dr #104 - Santa Ana, CA 92705 - P:(949)878-3509 - F:(949)878-3593 - www.tjwengineering.com Table 1 LOS & V/C R; A 0.000 - 0.600 B v 0.601 - 0.700 C 0.701 - 0.800 D 0.801- 0.900 E 1 0.901 -1.000 1 i F i >1.000 i This study utilizes a 1,600 vehicle per lane per hour saturation flow rate (1,440 vehicles per lane for dual left -turn lanes) and a clearance interval of ten percent. 2.3 PERFORMANCE CRITERIA & THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE The City of Baldwin Park target for peak hour intersection operation outside of the downtown area is LOS D or better. To determine whether the addition of project - generated trips at a signalized study intersection results in a significant impact, the City of Baldwin Park utilizes the following threshold of significance: • A significant traffic impact occurs at a signalized study intersection when a proposed project increases traffic demand by one percent or more of capacity (V /C > 0.01), causing or worsening LOS E or F. 3.0 Existing Conditions 3.1 EXISTING STUDY AREA CONDITIONS The characteristics of the roadway system in the vicinity of the proposed project site are described below: Ramona Boulevard, in the project vicinity, is an east -west, four -lane divided roadway with a raised, landscaped median and a Class II bike lane in each direction. The posted speed limit on Ramona Boulevard is 40 miles per hour west of Baldwin Park Boulevard and 35 miles per hour east of Baldwin Park Boulevard. On- street parking is prohibited on Ramona Boulevard between Merced Avenue and Baldwin Park Boulevard. Ramona Boulevard is classified as an arterial in the City of Baldwin Park General Plan Circulation Element. TJW Engineering, Inc. LDC13 -001 TTM72195 TIA Revised 08 -11 -2014 31 page Merced Avenue, in the project vicinity, is a northwest - southeast, four -lane undivided roadway with a painted double yellow stripe. The posted speed limit on Merced Avenue is 35 miles per hour. On- street parking is generally permitted on Merced Avenue. Merced Avenue is classified as a collector in the City of Baldwin Park General Plan Circulation Element. Baldwin Park Boulevard, in the project vicinity, is a northeast- southwest, four -lane divided roadway. Between 1 -10 and Ramona Boulevard, Baldwin Park Boulevard generally has a raised, landscaped median; north of Ramona Boulevard, Baldwin Park Boulevard has a continuous left -turn lane. The posted speed limit on Baldwin Park Boulevard is 40 miles per hour. On- street parking is permitted on Baldwin Park Boulevard. Baldwin Park Boulevard is classified as an arterial in the City of Baldwin Park General Plan Circulation Element. Foster Avenue, in the project vicinity, is a northwest - southeast, two -lane undivided roadway. The posted speed limit on Foster Avenue is 25 miles per hour. On- street parking is permitted on Foster Avenue. Foster Avenue is classified as a residential street in the City of Baldwin Park General Plan Circulation Element. Vineland Avenue, in the project vicinity, is a northeast - southwest, two -lane undivided roadway. The posted speed limit on Vineland Avenue is 30 miles per hour. On- street parking is permitted on Vineland Avenue. Vineland Avenue is classified as a residential street in the City of Baldwin Park General Plan Circulation Element. Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities: There is a striped bicycle lane in both directions on Ramona Boulevard. Sidewalks are present on all roadways with the exception of the north side of Ramona Boulevard east and west of Merced Avenue, and curb ramps are present at all intersections studied in this analysis. Existing Public Transit Services: Metro Bus Route 190 runs between the El Monte Transit Center and Cal Poly Pomona with stops in Baldwin Park and at the Baldwin Park Metrolink station. Headways on Bus Route 90 are approximately 20 -30 minutes. In the project vicinity, Bus Route 190 runs along Ramona Boulevard, with a stop at the Baldwin Park Boulevard /Ramona Boulevard intersection. Foothill Transit Bus Route 178 runs between the Puente Hills Mall and the El Monte Station with stops at the Baldwin Park Metrolink station during peak hours only and headways of approximately 30 minutes throughout the day. In the project vicinity, Bus Route 178 runs along Pacific Avenue with a stop at the Baldwin Park Boulevard /Ramona Boulevard intersection. Foothill Transit Bus Route 272 runs between Duarte, Baldwin Park and West Covina with stops at the Baldwin Park Metrolink station during peak hours only and headways of 30 -60 minutes throughout the day. Bus Route 272 does not run during the evenings. In the project vicinity, Bus Route 272 runs along Merced Avenue and Baldwin Park Boulevard, with a stop at the Baldwin Park Boulevard /Merced Avenue intersection. TJW Engineering, Inc. LDC13 -001 TTM72195 TIA Revised 08-11 -2014 41 page The Baldwin Park Transit Shuttle operates two transit lines that run in a circle around the city, one ina clockwise circulation pattern (Pumpkin Line), and one ina counterclockwise circulation pattern (Teal Line). The closest stop to the project she is at the Ramona Boulevard/Merced Avenue intersection with headways of 12 minutes during the peak commute periods. 3.2 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES To determine the existing operation of the study intersections, AM and PM peak period traffic counts were collected on Wednesday, May 22, 2013. The traffic volumes used in this analysis are from the highest hour within the peak period counted. Detailed traffic count data is provided in Appendix A. Exhibit 2 shows existing AM and PK4 peak hour volumes at the study intersections. Exhibit 3shoxo existing conditions study area intersection geometry. 3.3 EXISTING CONDITIONS INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS Existing conditions AM and PM peak hour intersection analysis is shown in Table 2. Calculations are based on the existin88eumetrics at the study area intersections as shown in Exhibit 3. Detailed analysis sheets are provided in Appendix B. Table \nteroeutonAnawom— EwsanRmonoruonn Signalized Intersections (VIC—LOS) Merced Avenue/Ramona Boulevard 0.469 — A 0.527 — A Baldwin Park Boulevard/Ramona Boulevard 0.531 — A 0.653 — B Baldwin Park Boulevard/Merced Avenue 0.571 —A 0.578 — A Baldwin Park Boulevard/Foster Avenue 0.487 — A 0.359 — A Vineland Avenue/Merced Avenue 0.545 — A 0.425 — A Note: V/C — Volume to Capacity, Delay shown in seconds As shown in Table 2, the intersections are currently operating at an acceptable LOS (LOS D or better). TJW Engineering, Inc. LDC13{0tTTnN72195T|A Revised O8-11-2O14 5 1pege A, �^ 6gj�917� O 4v �P �O �P Legend: XX /XX - AM /PM Peak Hour Volume 39pj7�j �-+' •s s0. ;,?, O h 0 J Y Q a 2 0 J m w 0 3 w z N -1351114 —332/315 l 147160 )`��' -`' 30/38 r 412/405 33/17 1 "P�- MERGED AVE /'� �l �' 51/40 '� 79155-' 302/343 -► 0,0 95174 -,, P�m 277/315 -► 71/48 O)C as U1 CP v 0 04- 15/21 16/13 k�o 90151 TER FOS AVE 60/27 -'� t� 120/43— 142/31 jv MW Existing Lane Geometry +& Intersection Control LDC -13 -001 TTM72195 Traffic Impact Analysis - November 2013 A '14 ► � Not s Scale Traffic Engineering & Transportation Planning Consultants - 540N. Golden Circle Dr #104 - Santa Ana, CA 92705 - P:(949)878-3509 - F:(949)878-3593 - www,tjwengineering.com 4.0 Proposed Project 4.1 Project Description The proposed project is located at the southwest corner of the Baldwin Park Boulevard /Merced Avenue intersection and would consist of 51 single family dwelling units on the 3.65 acre site, encompassing 13821 and 13825 Kenmore Avenue and 3625, 3637 and 3649 Baldwin Park Boulevard. Site access for the proposed project is planned at one full access location on Merced Avenue. The project site is bound by Merced Avenue to the north, Baldwin Park Boulevard to the east; single family homes and Kenmore Avenue to the south and single family homes to the west. The project site is currently occupied by five single family homes, a flower /gift shop, a church and a school. Exhibit 4 shows the proposed project site plan. 4.2 Project Trip Generation Industry Standard Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) 9t" Edition trip generation rates were used to determine trip generation of the proposed project. Trip Generation Credits for Existing Land Use Displaced by the Proposed Project Of the existing land uses on the proposed project site, the five single family homes were active and generating trips at the time the traffic counts occurred. Therefore the forecast trip generation of the displaced single family homes will be subtracted from the proposed project's total trip generation. For the purposes of this traffic study, the existing church, school and flower shop were assumed to not be generating trips when traffic counts occurred. Therefore no trip generation credit is given for the displaced church, school and flower shop land uses. Table 3 shows the ITE rates used to calculate forecast trip generation of the proposed project. TJW Engineering, Inc. LDC13 -001 TTM72195 TIA Revised 08 -11 -2014 61 page t i I I I I I I �j i x�sm'aY Source: Land Development Consultants (August 2014) Exhibit 4: Proposed Project Site Plan LDC -13 -001 TTM72195 Traffic Impact Analysis - August 2013 Traffic Engineering & Transportation Planning Consultants - 540 N. Golden Circle Dr #104 - Santa Ana, CA 92705 Not to Scale P:(949)878-3509 - F:(949)878-3693 - www.tjwengineering.com NO% r IN ! A r� t._ it I T- I D Source: Land Development Consultants (August 2014) Exhibit 4: Proposed Project Site Plan LDC -13 -001 TTM72195 Traffic Impact Analysis - August 2013 Traffic Engineering & Transportation Planning Consultants - 540 N. Golden Circle Dr #104 - Santa Ana, CA 92705 Not to Scale P:(949)878-3509 - F:(949)878-3693 - www.tjwengineering.com NO% IN ! A rij!"N' 9� bla9 1 < 'w"', .my8� �z M" Nam MINE -t Source: Land Development Consultants (August 2014) Exhibit 4: Proposed Project Site Plan LDC -13 -001 TTM72195 Traffic Impact Analysis - August 2013 Traffic Engineering & Transportation Planning Consultants - 540 N. Golden Circle Dr #104 - Santa Ana, CA 92705 Not to Scale P:(949)878-3509 - F:(949)878-3693 - www.tjwengineering.com Table 4 shows the gross trip generation of the proposed project before accounting for displaced land uses and pass -by discounts. Gross trip generation will be reflected at the project driveways in the traffic impact analysis. Table 4 Gross Trip Generation of Proposed Project — Vehicle Trips at Project Driveways Note: DU = dwelling unit, As shown in Table 4, before accounting for existing land uses on the site the proposed project is forecast to generate approximately 39 AM peak hour trips, 51 PM peak hour trips and 486 daily trips. Gross trip generation will be reflected at the project driveways in the traffic impact analysis. Table 5 shows the net new trip generation of the proposed project after accounting for displaced land uses. Net new trip generation will be distributed to the study intersections /study area in the traffic impact analysis. Net New Trip Generation of P Table 5 d Project — Vehicle Trips Distributed to Studv Intersections Single Family Dwelling Units -5 du -1 -3 1 -4 -3 -2 1 -5 -48 Single Family Dwelling Units 51 du 10 29 39 32 19 51 486 Total Net New Project Trip Generation 9 26 35 29 17 46 438 Note: DU = Dwelling Unit As shown in Table 3, the proposed project is forecast to generate approximately 35 net new AM peak hour trips, 46 net new PM peak hour trips and 438 net new daily trips. This analysis conservatively assumes no trip generation reduction associated with nearby transit opportunities. 4.3 Project Trip Distribution and Assignment The forecast trip distribution for this project is based on the existing traffic patterns of the surrounding streets and intersections as well as potential interactions between the proposed project land use and surrounding land uses, the trip distribution factors contained in Appendix D of the Los Angeles County Congestion Management Program (LACMP, Metro, 2010), as well as engineering judgment. TJW Engineering, Inc. LDC13 -001 TTM72195 TIA Revised 08 -11 -2014 71 page Exhibit 5 shows the forecast trip distribution of proposed project trips. Exhibit 6 shows the corresponding forecast AM /PM peak hour trip assignment of project trips. 1 w e ect Conditions This section analyzes the impact of the addition of project generated trips to existing conditions traffic volumes. 5.1 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES Existing plus project traffic volumes were derived by adding forecast project generated trips to existing traffic volumes. Exhibit 7 shows existing plus project AM and PM peak hour volumes at the study intersections. 5.2 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS Existing plus project conditions AM and PM peak hour intersection analysis is shown in Table 6. Detailed analysis sheets are provided in Appendix C. Table 6 Intersection Analysis — Existing Plus Project Conditions Note: V /C— Volume to Capacity, Delay shown in seconds As shown in Table 6, the study intersections are forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS (LOS D or better) for existing plus project conditions. As also shown in Table 6, based on agency thresholds of significance, the addition of project generated trips is forecast to result in no significant impacts at the study intersection for existing plus project conditions. TJW Engineering, Inc. LDC13 -001 TTM72195 TIA Revised 08 -11 -2014 81 page 1; 11111!1910-w IN LDC -13 -001 TTM72195 Traffic Impact Analysis - November 2013 X �r Not a Scale Traffic Engineering & Transportation Planning Consultants - 540 N. Golden Circle Dr #104 - Santa Ana, CA 92705 - P:(949)878-3509 - F:(949)878-3593 - www.tjwengineedng.com Baldwin Park /Merced Intersection Exhibit 6: Forecast AM/PM Peak Hour Trip Assignment of Proposed Project LDC -13 -001 TTM72195 Traffic Impact Analysis - November 2013 Not to Scale Traffic Engineering & Transportation Planning Consultants - 540 N. Golden Circle Dr #104 - Santa Ana, CA 92705 - P: (949) 878 -3509 - F: (949) 878 -3593 - www.tjwengineering.com A (b N A 26829 7 "-�' � $23s 2s2 J� �v �P �P Legend: XX /XX - AM /PM Peak Hour Volume lip � � 777, 396, ?1�9 yy \ice t� ,W- t °jry� y�M �CA A O 09 Y 4 z v m V �- rwn�N) � 135/114 -+— 334/322 0 J /-147/60 MERGED AVE FOSTER AVE 60/27 -� 120/43 —+► 55/43 ' 142131- 79/55 -"( 309/347 104180 281/318 —► 74/50- -y,, w 0) c U1 V �- nc° o n> 15/22 —90/51 �- 16113 FOSTER AVE 60/27 -� 120/43 —+► �wm 142131- �o� w U S O w Z -+- 4013/409 ,0,--33/17 f a�a 47W N V� Q This section analyzes project opening year (2015) without project traffic conditions. The proposed project is expected to be built and generating trips in 2015. 6.1 PROJECT OPENING YEAR (2015) WITHOUT PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES Since the proposed project is expected to be generating trips in 2015, project opening year (2015) without project traffic volumes were derived by applying an annual growth rate of 0.82 percent per year, fnr twn years; to existing (2013) traffir volumes concictent With Exhibit D -1 (General Traffir Volume Growth Factors) in Appendix D of the Los Angeles County Congestion Management Program (Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transit Authority, 2010). Exhibit 8 shows project opening year (2015) without project AM and PM peak hour volumes at the study intersections. 6.2 PROJECT OPENING YEAR (2015) WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS Project opening year (2015) without project conditions AM and PM peak hour intersection analysis is shown in Table 7. Detailed analysis sheets are provided in Appendix D. intersection Analysis — Project Upenmg Year (zuis) witnout Project concutions Signalized Intersections (V /C — LOS) Merced Avenue /Ramona Boulevard 0.475 —A 0.534 —A Baldwin Park Boulevard /Ramona Boulevard 0.538 —A 0.656 —B Baldwin Park Boulevard /Merced Avenue 0.580 —A 0.586 —A Baldwin Park Boulevard /Foster Avenue 0.493 — A 0.363 — A Vineland Avenue /Merced Avenue 0.552 —A 0.430 —A Note: V/C — Volume to Capacity, Delay shown in seconds As shown in Table 7, the study intersections are forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS (LOS D or better) for project opening year (2015) without project conditions. TJW Engineering, Inc. LDC13 -001 TTM72195 TIA Revised 08 -11 -2014 91 page .1\O b 5P '�b ,"3 j27 ss,�s � so Su Legend: XX /XX - AM /PM Peak Hour Volume 7 3792i��� ..-� 1911 0, s� 18 08 Q J m Y X a Z w Q 0 w Z CDas ' �Cn to 000 °� �`° 337/320 149/61 ) N °�' 30/39 ..— 419/412 34J17 /, MERCED AVE /� � �- 52J41-� 80/56- ' 307/349 -4-D l 97/75 -� wiwo 282/320 —► 72149 -.,� o= ncri 00mw coi+�o o � V V 15/21 N� +- 91/52 �.- 16/13 FOSTER AVE 61 /27 - 122/44 —► 144/32-,, N � NtT 81 0 Exhibit 8: Forecast Year 2015 Without Project AM/PM Peak Hour Intersection Volumes LDC -13 -001 TTM72195 Traffic Impact Analysis - November 2013 Traffic Engineering & Transportation Planning Consultants - 540 N. Golden Circle Dr #104 - Santa Ana, CA 92705 - P: (949) 878 -3509 Not to Scale F:(949)878-3593 - www.tjwengineedng.com This section analyzes the impact of the addition of project generated trips to project opening year (2015) without project conditions traffic volumes. 7.1 PROJECT OPENING YEAR (2015) WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES Project opening year (2015) with project traffic volumes were derived by adding forecast project generated trips to project opening year (2015) without project volumes. Exhibit 9 shows project opening year (2015) with project AM and PM peak hour volumes at the study intersections. PROJECT OPENING YEAR PROJECT CONDITIONS I ANALYSIS LEVEL OF SERVICE Project opening year (2015) with project conditions AM and PM peak hour intersection analysis is shown in Table 8. Detailed analysis sheets are provided in Appendix E. Table 8 Note: V/C — Volume to Capacity, Delay shown in seconds As shown in Table 8, the study intersections are forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS (LOS D or better) for project opening year (2015) with project conditions. As also shown in Table 8, based on the agency thresholds of significance the addition of project generated trips is forecast to result in no significant impacts at the study intersections for project opening year (2015) with project conditions. TJW Engineering, Inc. LDC13 -001 TTM72195 TIA Revised 08 -11 -2014 101 page �O �O QP q�P qJ a �e�S32s� `��2r8j8 ssgs`'y'�o 1 Legend: XX /XX - AM /PM Peak Hour Volume ry � h J CO le a� _Z S' r M - 137/116 -+— 339/327 149/61 MERGED AVE 56144-"W 1 314/353 --■- 106/81 oV�orwo aoc�'ow w N 6�ACO w -N 15/22 -�- 91/52 ,,,16/13 FOSTER AVE 61 /27 -'-,,, 122/44 -+► 144/32 NCn� !J1 80/56 286!323 -► 75/51 --,4, Exhibit 9: Forecast Year 2015 With Project W Q 0 z J LU z *'- 30/39 —420/416 �- 34/17 0.80 8.0 Forecast Year 2030 Without Project Conditions This section analyzes Forecast Year 203Uwithout project traffic conditions. 8.1 FORECAST YEAR 2O3O WITHOUT PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES Forecast Year 2030 without project traffic volumes were derived by applying an annual growth rate of 0.82 percent per year, for seventeen years to existing (2013) traffic volumes consistent with Exhibit D'1 (General Traffic Volume Growth Factors) in Appendix D of the Los Angeles County Conges�on8�onogennentPnognoon/Lu�Ange��Cuunty8�e�ropo��unTh7ns/�Aut�u���202nU,. Exhibit 10 shows Forecast Year 2030 without project AM and PM peak hour volumes at the study intersections. 8.2 FORECAST YEAR 2030 WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS INTERSECTION Forecast Year 2030 without project conditions AM and PM peak hour intersection analysis is shown inTable9. Detailed analysis sheets are provided in Appendix F. Table intersection Anaiysis — Forecast Year zusu witnout Project Loncitions Note: V/C — Volume to Capacity, Delay shown in seconds As shown in Table 9, the study intersections are forecast tn continue to operate at an acceptable LOS (LOS Dor better) for Forecast Yeor203Dvvithou1pro/ectconditions. TJVV Engineering, Inc. LDC13-001 TTM72195 TIA Revised 08-11-2014 111 page Signalized Intersections (VIC — LOS) Merced Avenue/Ramona Boulevard 0.524 — A 0.590 — A Baldwin Park Boulevard/Ramona Boulevard 0.599 — A 0.729 — C Baldwin Park Boulevard/Merced Avenue 0.642 — B 0.649 — B Baldwin Park Boulevard/Foster Avenue 0.544 — A 0.397 — A Vineland Avenue/Merced Avenue 0.611 — B 0.470 — A Note: V/C — Volume to Capacity, Delay shown in seconds As shown in Table 9, the study intersections are forecast tn continue to operate at an acceptable LOS (LOS Dor better) for Forecast Yeor203Dvvithou1pro/ectconditions. TJVV Engineering, Inc. LDC13-001 TTM72195 TIA Revised 08-11-2014 111 page �p Q� ry 30 Legend: XX /XX - AM /PM Peak Hour Volume �OACOO� .� ^ ^Q5 sr psi .�-� 36 �r 0� 3� / 6��88 8 O J CIO Y a Z 0 J m I W Q 0 15 W Z ;8 1 �, 1 155/131 R - 381/362 , 169/69 /44 — 473/4 65 38120 3cr"a 4- MERCED AVE 0,, i4757193194- 91 /63 3 ,E COm 318/362 — 82!55 CO ow N) 00 O IR cn �- ,J�2 ;#\ 17!24 +— 103!59 -18115 �. FOSTER AVE 69131 t 138/49 --*- 163/36 -� c boo NSW N Co F-11 Jill rj;l Jill EM. • • LDC -13 -001 TTM72195 Traffic Impact Analysis - November 2013 Traffic Engineering & Transportation Planning Consultants - 540N. Golden Circle Dr #104 - Santa Ana, CA 92705 - P: (949) 878 -3509 - F: (949) 878 -3593 Not to Scale www.tjwengineering.com 9.0 Forecast Year 2030 With Project t r • This section analyzes the impact of the addition of project generated trips to Forecast Year 2030 without project traffic volumes. r'111i =11 Nii, •i : Z►•LI ii11 >i:llits lii:7_l3 [4 "s Forecast Year 2030 with project traffic volumes were derived by adding forecast project generated trips to Forecast Year 2030 without project volumes. Exhibit 11 shows Forecast Year 2030 with nrniprt AM and PnA naalt hour volumes at the study intarcertlnns 9.2 FORECAST YEAR 2030 WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS Forecast Year 2030 with project conditions AM and PM peak hour intersection analysis is shown in Table 10. Detailed analysis sheets are provided in Appendix G. Table 10 intersection Nnarvsis - rorecast rear Lusu with rroiect c.onaitvons Signalized Intersections (V /C - LOS) Merced Ave /Ramona Blvd 0.524 —A 0.590 —A 1 0.526 —A 0.003 0.591 —A 0.001 No Baldwin Park Blvd /Ramona Blvd 0.599 — A 0.729 — C 0.600 —A 0.001 0.738 — C 0.009 No Baldwin Park Blvd /Merced Ave 0.642 — B 0.649 — B 0.647 — B 0.005 0.652 — B 0.003 No Baldwin Park Blvd /Foster Ave 0.544 —A 0.397 —A 0.547 —A 0.003 0.399 —A 0.002 No Vineland Ave /Merced Ave 0.611 — B 0.470 —A 0.612 — B 0.001 0.473 — A 0.003 No Note: V/C — Volume to Capacity, Delay shown in seconds As shown in Table 10, the study intersections are forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS (LOS D or better) for Forecast Year 2030 with project conditions. As also shown in Table 10, based on the agency thresholds of significance the addition of project generated trips is forecast to result in no significant impacts at the study intersections for Forecast Year 2030 with project conditions. TJW Engineering, Inc. LDC13 -001 TTM72195 TIA Revised 08 -11 -2014 121 page h P� V �' 8 � .�--• 26/69 ©� 9Q/59269 -P �V K" Legend: XX /XX - AM /PM Peak Hour Volume ../ ACV ! pro /�68& 61jl cb ^o�A—\ � O D6 Y 4 y_Z. Q m ;o a ® -4 cn -+— 381369 169/69 j N-4 138/49— 163/36- MERCED AV3°"""J E / 63/49 — �0� 91/63- 311 / 98 a°'�oo cJO 322/365 ° 85/57--., 3 MOOD 4 W Q O W z *- 34/44 —474/469 /-38/20 f scam o� WNw Exhibit 11: Forecast Year 2030 With Project AM /PM Peak Hour Intersection Volumes LDC -13 -001 TTM72195 Traffic Impact Analysis - November 2013 `rr Traffic Engineering & Transportation Planning Consultants - 540 N. Golden Circle Dr #104 - Santa Ana, CA 92705 - P:(949)878-3609 - F:(949)878-3593 Not to Scale www.tjwengineering.com Cocoa 17/25 —103/59 18/15 �- FOSTER AVE 69/31 --'4( 138/49— 163/36- Q .f,6N NJ .00 w -4 W Q O W z *- 34/44 —474/469 /-38/20 f scam o� WNw Exhibit 11: Forecast Year 2030 With Project AM /PM Peak Hour Intersection Volumes LDC -13 -001 TTM72195 Traffic Impact Analysis - November 2013 `rr Traffic Engineering & Transportation Planning Consultants - 540 N. Golden Circle Dr #104 - Santa Ana, CA 92705 - P:(949)878-3609 - F:(949)878-3593 Not to Scale www.tjwengineering.com According to the CMP (Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, July 2010), those proposed projects, which meet the following criteria, shall be evaluated: All CMP arterial monitoring intersections, including monitored freeway on or off -ramp intersections, where the proposed project will add 50 or more trips during either the AM or PM weekday peak hours (of adjacent street traffic). Mainline freeway monitoring locations where the project will add 150 or more trips, in either direction, during either the AM or PM weekday peak hours. No CMP monitored intersections are forecast to receive 50 or more project - generated trips during either the AM peak hour or the PM peak hour as shown in Exhibit 7. Since the project is forecast to generate approximately 35 net new AM peak hour trips and approximately 46 net new PM peak hour trips, no CMP mainline freeway monitoring location is forecast to receive 150 or more project - generated trips during either the AM peak hour or the PM peak hour. Therefore, the proposed project is forecast to have no significant CMP traffic impacts. CMP Transit Impacts The following transit services are available in the vicinity of the proposed project site: • Foothill Transit fixed bus line 272 which travels along Merced Avenue and Baldwin Park Boulevard adjacent to the project site. • Metro fixed bus line 190 which travels along Ramona Boulevard north of the project site. • The Baldwin Park Transit Pumpkin and Teal shuttles, which run along Frazier Avenue and Ramona Boulevard north of the project site. Detailed transit information is contained in Appendix H. The proposed project is forecast to generate approximately 438 net new daily trips, which include approximately 35 net new AM peak hour trips and approximately 46 net new PM peak hour trips. In accordance with CMP guidelines, person trips can be estimated using a 1.4 factor to convert total vehicle trips to person trips, which results in a total of approximately 133 AM peak hour person trips, approximately 120 PM peak hour person trips, and approximately 1,596 daily person trips generated by the project. Based on CMP guidelines for determining trips assigned to transit, the following factor applicable to the proposed project it utilized: • 3.5 percent of Total Person Trips Generated. Table 11 shows the calculation of project - generated transit trips, utilizing CMP guidelines. TJW Engineering, Inc. LDC13 -001 TTM72195 TIA Revised 08 -11 -2014 13 1 page Table 11 TTM72195 Project — Transit Trip Generation As shown in Table 11, based on the CMP guidelines, and the proximity of the various project land uses in relation to available transit in the project vicinity, the proposed project is forecast to generate approximately 2 AM peak hour transit trips, approximately 3 PM peak hour transit trips, and approximately 22 daily transit trips. Since the proposed project transit trips can be accommodated by existing transit service in the project vicinity, no significant CMP transit impacts are forecast to occur. Darki As shown in the project site plan (Exhibit 4), the residential portion of the site will have 102 garage parking spaces (two spaces per unit) and 18 open visitor parking spaces. Per the City of Baldwin Park Zoning Code section 153.150.40 (Number of Parking Spaces Required), Townhome dwelling units are required to have 2 garage spaces /dwelling unit, plus 1 additional garage or surface space when dwelling units contains 5 or more bedrooms. Since the proposed project dwelling units consists of 3 -4 bedroom units, 2 garage spaces would be required per unit. For the 51 units planned, 102 garage spaces would be required; therefore the 102 garage spaces provided meet City Code requirements. For single family dwelling units, there is no established requirement for guest parking, however the City does require 1 guest space for every 3 dwelling units for other types of residential construction. The 18 visitor parking spaces provided by the proposed project exceed the City code requirements of 17 guest parking spaces (51 units /3 = 17). Therefore, the residential component of the proposed project meets or exceeds City requirements for both assigned and guest parking. TJW Engineering, Inc. LDC13 -001 TTM72195 TIA Revised 08 -11 -2014 141 page Proposed Project Vehicle 35 46 438 Trip Generation Person Trips Conversion 1.4 1.4 1.4 Factor Proposed Project Person Trips 49 64 614 Transit Trip Conversion Factor 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% Proposed Project Transit Trip 2 3 22 Generation As shown in Table 11, based on the CMP guidelines, and the proximity of the various project land uses in relation to available transit in the project vicinity, the proposed project is forecast to generate approximately 2 AM peak hour transit trips, approximately 3 PM peak hour transit trips, and approximately 22 daily transit trips. Since the proposed project transit trips can be accommodated by existing transit service in the project vicinity, no significant CMP transit impacts are forecast to occur. Darki As shown in the project site plan (Exhibit 4), the residential portion of the site will have 102 garage parking spaces (two spaces per unit) and 18 open visitor parking spaces. Per the City of Baldwin Park Zoning Code section 153.150.40 (Number of Parking Spaces Required), Townhome dwelling units are required to have 2 garage spaces /dwelling unit, plus 1 additional garage or surface space when dwelling units contains 5 or more bedrooms. Since the proposed project dwelling units consists of 3 -4 bedroom units, 2 garage spaces would be required per unit. For the 51 units planned, 102 garage spaces would be required; therefore the 102 garage spaces provided meet City Code requirements. For single family dwelling units, there is no established requirement for guest parking, however the City does require 1 guest space for every 3 dwelling units for other types of residential construction. The 18 visitor parking spaces provided by the proposed project exceed the City code requirements of 17 guest parking spaces (51 units /3 = 17). Therefore, the residential component of the proposed project meets or exceeds City requirements for both assigned and guest parking. TJW Engineering, Inc. LDC13 -001 TTM72195 TIA Revised 08 -11 -2014 141 page As shown in the project site plan (Exhibit 4), project site access for the proposed project is planned at one full access location on Merced Avenue. The driveway features a raised median with a 20- foot lane (one inbound lane and one outbound lane) on either side of the median. The 20 foot width of the outbound lane will help egress at it allows for a de -facto right -turn lane, and vehicles can turn left and right out of the driveway at the same time. 13.0 Conclusions Before accounting for existing land uses on the site, the proposed project is forecast to generate approximately 39 AM peak hour trips, 51 PM peak hour trips and 486 daily trips at the project access locations. After accounting for displacement of existing land uses, the proposed project is forecast to generate approximately 35 net new AM peak hour trips, 46 net new PM peak hour trips and 438 net new daily trips. The study intersections are currently operating at an acceptable Level of Service (LOS D or better), and are forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS for existing plus project conditions. The study intersections are forecast to operate at an acceptable Level of Service (LOS D or better) for both Project ©jJEi7li1g Year 2015 v ✓ithtiCit Project and Project tipE'rilf7g Year 2015 With Proj2Ci conditions. The study intersections are forecast to operate at an acceptable Level of Service (LOS D or better) for both Forecast Year 2030 Without Project and Forecast Year 2030 With Project conditions. Based on City of Baldwin Park thresholds of significance, the addition of project generated trips is forecast to result in no significant impacts at the study intersections for all with project scenarios. Since the project is forecast to generate approximately 35 net new AM peak hour trips and approximately 46 net new PM peak hour trips, no CMP mainline freeway monitoring location is forecast to receive 150 or more project - generated trips during either the AM peak hour or the PM peak hour. Therefore, the proposed project is forecast to have no significant CMP traffic impacts. Since the proposed project transit trips can be accommodated by existing transit service in the project vicinity, no significant CMP transit impacts are forecast to occur. Since no significant impacts are forecast to occur at the study intersections based on agency thresholds of significance, no mitigation measures are required for the proposed project. Based on the current site plan (Exhibit 4) and the City of Baldwin Park Zoning Code, the proposed project satisfies off - street parking requirements. TJW Engineering, Inc. LDC13 -001 TTM72195 TIA Revised 08 -11 -2014 15 1 page Appendices EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNTS INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY: PACIFIC TRAFFIC DATA tel: 951249 3226 pacific@aimtd.com DATE: Wed, May 22, 13 LOCATION: NORTH & SOUTH: EAST & WEST: Baldwin Park Merced Avenue Ramona Boulevard PROJECT #: LOCATION #: CONTROL: SC0191 I SIGNAL NOTES: A011 ti W A N S NORTHBOUND Merced Avenue SOUTHBOUND Merced Avenue EASTBOUND Ramona Boulevard WESTBOUND Ramona Boulevard LANES: NL 1 NT 2 NR 1 SL 1 ST 3 SR 0 EL 1 ET 2 ER 0 WL 1 WT 2 WR 0 TOTAL �j 7:00 AM 10 1 37 2 7 38 12 9 61 11 4 179 10 380 7:15 AM 11 38 7 10 72 20 7 60 8 2 170 7 412 7:30 AM 22 37 8 18 13 107 13 2 148 20 7:45 AM 21 86 14 19 --76 68 ----24 15 14 114 8 6 153 11 529 8:00 AM 19 49 12 18 67 9 20 132 12 1 124 12 475 8:15 AM 16 55 10 22 56 16 17 106 17 9 140 14 8:30 AM 10 55 12 14 77 19 21 131 15 5 112 ii 14 485 8:45 AM 20 43 16 16 46 11 1 17 124 9 6 129 13 450 <!VOLUMES APPROACH % 129 21% 400 66% 81 13% 124 17% 500 67% 126 17% 1 118 11% 835 80% 93 9% 35 I 3% 1,155 890/0 101 80/0 3,697 APP DEPART 610 619 750 628 1,046 1,040 1,291 1 1,410 0 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES APPROACH % PEAK HR FACTOR 78 22% 7:30 AM 227 65% 0.721 44 13% 77 19% 267 65% 0.864 64 16% 64 11% 459 80% 0.873 50 9% 18 3% 565 88% 0.941 57 9% 1,970 0.931 APP DEPART 349 348 408 335 573 580 640 707 0 4:00 PM 9 55 8 14 63 7 21 222 to ill 17 557 4:15 PM 9 60 15 16 51 14 19 192 25 14 90 17 522 4:30 PM 5 42 7 14 56 12 27 235 25 11 107 16 557 4:45 PM 11 65 19 12 67 5 22 178 22 9 107 19 536 5:00 PM 12 62 17 20 78 10 19 224 28 11 105 14 600 5:15 PM 13 72 11 26 75 1-0 2-4 —181 21 5 98 15 551 5—.-36-PA----- 10 1 16 17 72 13 25 206 1 25 -93— 1-4 -- --55-9— 5:45 PM 14 56 1 16 18 1 67 11 21 207 1 18 14 91 14 547 VOLUMES APPROACH % 83 13% 472 71% 109 16% 137 529 71% 82 11% 178 9% 1,645 82% 184 9% 82 8% 802 79% 126 12% 4,429 APP DEPART 664 776 -18% 748 795 2,007 1,891 1,010 967 0 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES APPROACH % PEAK HR FACTOR 49 14% 5:00 PM 250 70% 0.935 60 17% 81 19% 292 70% 0.939 44 11% 89 9% 818 82% 0.922 92 9% 38 8% 387 80% 0.927 57 12% 2,257 0.940 APP DEPART 359 1 396 1 417 422 999 9 9 4 959 1 482 4 480 0 1 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY: PACIFIC TRAFFIC DATA tel: 951249 3226 pacific@aimtd.com DATE: Wed, May 22, 13 LOCATION: NORTH & SOUTH: EAST & WEST: Baldwin Park Merced Avenue Baldwin Park Boulevard PROJECT #: LOCATION #: CONTROL: SC0191 2 SIGNAL NOTES: AM PM NIED OTHER N 1A1 S E NORTHBOUND Merced Avenue SOUTHBOUND Merced Avenue EASTBOUND Baldwin Park Boulevard WESTBOUND Baldwin Park Boulevard LANES: NL 1 NT 2 NR 0 SL 1 ST 2 SR 0 EL 1 � ET 2 ER 0 WLTWT 1 2 WR 0 TOTAL 7:00 AM 35 50 12 3 37 14 10 62 10 14 120 5 372 7:15 AM 36 54 15 23 42 25 11 80 10 24 1 115 7 442 7:30 AM 32 68 31 6— 70 32 10 100 13 25 157 8 552 7:45 AM 35 133 50 21 93 24 22 113 —112 12 67 ----1-49 170 6 746 8:00 AM 30 64 27 76 26- 12 3-2 1-0 556 8:15 AM 34 78 19 6 58 25 19 90 18 31 160 555 - 8:30 AM 48 57 3 25 110 27 33 145 L17L 10 603 - 8:45 AM 27 65 32 17 60 8 21 65 12 29 105 1 12 453 VOLUMES APPROACH 0/b 277 26% 569 53% 225 21% 100 13% 511 65% 174 22% 126 13% 732 75% 114 12°,;, 255 18% 1.,121 770//v- 75 5% 4.,279-1 APP DEPART 1071 770 785 880 972 1,057 1,451 1,572 0 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES APPROACH % IPEAK HR FACTOR 147 24% 7:45 AM 332 54% 0.704 135 22% 51 11% 302 67% 0.812 95 21% 74 13% 425 75% 0.877 69 12% 163 20% 624 75% 0.854 43 5% 2,460 0.824 APP DEPART 614 449 448 534 568 611 830 866 0 4:00 PM 24 47 21 18 72 14 25 114 8 40 99 10 492 4:15 PM 20 67 28 4 72 15 24 f2-6-17 38 95 6 512 4:30 PM 13 52 26 10 78 15 22 142 18 49 119 13 557 4:45 PM 16 67 10 94 22 24 136 30 57 82 5 569 5:00 PM 15 76 43 -fb-- _R2 —17- --21- 116 —2 3 44 12 2 —8 6 —58- 5:15 PM 15 97 24 12 8-6 1— 5 28 114 1 26 48 110 7 582 5:30 PM 14 75 21 8 81 20 33 119 1 23 49 108 8 -559 5:45 PM 21 77 37 11 62 22 29 82 18 60 80 7 506 VOLUMES APPROACH % 138 15% 558 61% 226 25% 83 10% 627 74% 140 16% 206 16% 949 72% 172 13% 385 30% 815 64% 64 5% 4,363 APP DEPART 922 828 850 1,184 1,327 1,258 1,264 1,093 0 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES APPROACH % PEAK HR FACTOR 60 12% 4:45 PM 315 64% 0.899 114 23% 40 9% 343 75% 0.907 74 16% 106 15% 485 69% 0.924 ill 16% 198 31% 422 65% 0.931 28 4% 2,296 0.980 APP DEPART 1 489 1 449 1 457 652 702 639 1 648 Z 556 0 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY: PACIFIC TRAFFIC DATA tel: 951249 3226 pacific@aimtd.com DATE: Wed, May 22, 13 LOCATION: Baldwin Park PROJECT #: SC0191 NORTH & SOUTH: Merced Avenue LOCATION #: 3 EAST & WEST: Vineland Avenue CONTROL: SIGNAL NOTES: mri A, N 4 1V.V S NORTHBOUND Merced Avenue SOUTHBOUND Merced Avenue EASTBOUND Vineland Avenue WESTBOUND Vineland Avenue LANES: NL NT 0 NR 0 TL 07 ST 0 SR 0 EL 0 ET ER 2 0 WL � WT WR 0 2 0 TOTAL 7:00 AM 6 59 8 17 44 9 1 16 1 —7— 3 30 13 207 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 5 75 8 82 6 14 7 9 56 71 8 7 11 11 17 1 12 18 7 6 1 35 20 11 66 22 258 326 7:45 AM 18 88 11 14 57 30 28 35 12 17 45 22 377 8:00 AM 3 99 5 19 68 14 20 26 19 14 46 38 371 8:15 AM 4 107 5 15 74 11 16 24 11 8 34 27 336 8:30 AM 8 118 9 31 78 16 15 28 9 10 27 28 377 8:45 AM 12 98 5 —f"134 22 55 19 11 11 6 8 47 18 312 VOLUMES APPROACH % 64 726 63 8% 85% 70,10 503 114 I 18% 67% Sc % 113 175 77 31% 48% 21% 77 330 188 13% 55% 32% 2,.564 APP DEPART 853 L 1,027 751 657 365 372 595 508 0 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES APPROACH % PEAK HR FACTOR 7:45 AM 33 412 30 7% 87% 6% 0.880 79 277 71 19% 65% 17% 0.854 79 113 51 33% 47% 21% 0.810 49 152 115 16% 48% 36% 0.806 1,461 0,969 APP DEPART 475 606 427 377 243 222 316 256 0 4:00 PM 4 49 9 10 32 3 9 13 3 3 16 4 155 4:15 PM 3 121 14 12 16 17 24 4 14 19 16 336 4:30 PM 3 83 5 --76 15 91 13 15 20 4 11 30 13 303 4:45 PM 6 102 16 -- 13 73 7 16 30 4 6 21 11 305 5:00 PM 5 99 3 15 75 12 16 31 8 10 13 7 ---294 5:15 PM 3 121 12 26 76 3 9 28 2 8 25 14 327 5:30 PM 90 13 27 51 8 11 28 3 9 24 16 287 5:45 PM 4 89 10 8 62 11 12 21 5 7 30 14 273 0- VOLUMES APPROACH % 35 754 82 4% 87% 9% 126 536 73 17% 73% 10% 105 195 33 32% 59% 10% 68 178 95 20% 52% 28% 2,280 APP DEPART 871 L 954 735 637 333 403 341 286 0 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES APPROACH % PEAK HR FACTOR 4:15 PM 17 405 38 4% 88% 8% 0.833 55 315 48 13% 75% 11% 0.878 64 105 20 34% 56% 11% 0.859 41 83 47 24% 49% 27% 0.792 1,238 0.921 APP DEPART 1 460 4 516 418 1 376 189 4 198 171 1 148 1 0 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY: PACIFIC TRAFFIC DATA tel: 951249 3226 pacific@aimtd.com DATE: Wed, May 22, 13 LOCATION: NORTH & SOUTH: EAST & WEST: Baldwin Park Baldwin Park Foster Avenue PROJECT #: LOCATION #: CONTROL: SC0191 4 SIGNAL NOTES: AM MD CYT HER .4 W ,ER_V AN S NORTHBOUND Foster Avenue SOUTHBOUND Foster Avenue EASTBOUND Baldwin Park WESTBOUND Baldwin Park LANES: NL 0 NT 0 NR 0 SL 0 ST 1 SR 1 EL 1 ff-T-ER 2 0 WL 1 WT 2 WR 0 TOTAL 7:00 AM 11 10 3 7 8 17 4 49 5 4 164 6 288 7:15 AM 4 19 7 6 6 17 15 78 2 5 120 9 288 7:30 AM 6 10 12 5 13 22 19 65 1 3 13 191 6 365 7:45 AM 6 9 7 _ 13 19 14 11 62 7 16 147 10 321 8:00 AM 18 3 14 14 18 11 114 3 4 190 10 403 8:15 AM 5 23 4 14 22 37 20 81 2 4 15 431 8:30 AM 3 1 33 5 25 467 4 9 22 86 2 —24- 7 179 25 485 8:45 AM --4------F 1-6 3 7 35 38 131 10 342 A92 IVOLUMES APPROACH % 43 I 19% 138 61% 44 20% 91 I 19% 166 35% 212 450% 120 I 16% 611 81% 26 3% 55 4% 1,326 — on% 91 6% .9 3 2, APP DEPART 225 1 349 469 247 757 746 1,472 1,581 0 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES APPROACH % PEAK HR FACTOR 16 13% 8:00 AM 90 74% 0.738 15 12% 60 19% 120 37% 0.654 142 44% 71 16% 357 82% 0.854 9 2% 17 2% 704 90% 0.876 60 80/0 1,661 0.856 APP DEPART 121 221 322 146 437 432 781 862 0 4:00 PM 7 7 2 4 10 16 22 128 5 3 135 10 349 4:15 PM 5 9 1 9 13 9 17 108 6 6 121 8 312 4:30 PM 3 8 4 9 10 6 10 125 5 3 115 6 304 4:45 PM 3 5 7 13 2 11 24 141 2 9— 117 4 338 5:00 PM 5 9 4 6 8 8 16 144 4 3 136 7 350 5:15 PM 3 12 3 6 14 8 14 143 7 -4 120 5 339 5:30 PM 2 12 8 7 10 6 16 126 3 2 108 8 368 5:45 PM 3 18 6 8 11 1 9 25 134 10 2-7 —140-1-12 378 VOLUMES APPROACH % 31 21% 80 55% 35 24% 62 29% 78 37% 73 34% 144 12% 1,049 85% 42 3% 32 3% 992 92% 60 6% 2,678 APP DEPART 146 1 284 213 152 1,235 1,146 1,084 1,096 0 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES APPROACH % PEAK HR FACTOR 13 15% 5:00 PM 51 60% 0.787 21 25% 27 27% 43 43% 0.902 31 31% 71 11% 547 85% 0.950 24 4% 11 2% 504 92% 0.888 32 6o 1,375 0.909 APP DEPART 85 1 154 101 z 78 642 595 547 548 0 _j INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY: PACIFIC TRAFFIC DATA tel: 951249 3226 pacific@aimtd.com DATE: Wed, May 22, 13 LOCATION: NORTH & SOUTH: EAST & WEST: Baldwin Park Baldwin Park Boulevard Ramona Boulevard PROJECT #: LOCATION #: CONTROL SC0191 5 SIGNAL NOTES: API R1 N -4 W S V NORTHBOUND Baldwin Park Boulevard SOUTHBOUND Baldwin Park Boulevard EASTBOUND Ramona Boulevard WESTBOUND Ramona Boulevard LANES: NL 1 NT 2 NR 1 SL 1 ST 2 SR 1 EL 1 ET 2 ER 0 WL 1 WT 2 WR 0 TOTAL 7:00 AM 13 38 13 11 54 12 7 1 65 2 29 210 17 471 7:15 AM —10 65 17 60 12 7 9 29 193 17 525 7:30 AM 1-7 --81 11 26 71 23 23 17- 122 4 34 177 10 599 7:45 AM 11 89 27 23 90 31 20 155 2- 29 183 10 670 8:00 AM 13 75 1 32 18 83 20 25 147 6 43 156 17 635 8:15 AM 15 71 4 31 92 26 20 110 2 34 160 1 7 602 _ 8:30 AM _ YO 83 25 38 87 13 — 27 152 5 33 170 19 672 x 8:45 AM 20 82 20 26 59 18 26 108 4 31 165 9 568 <!VOLUMES APPROACH 1 119 14% 584 670/o 170 197% 190 I 20% 596 63% 155 16% 155 i4% 956 84% 25 2% 262 15% 1,414 790/0 116 6% 4,742 APP DEPART 873 855 941 883 1,136 1,316 1,792 1,688 0 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES APPROACH % PEAK HR FACTOR 59 12% 7:45 AM 318 66% 0.947 108 22% 110 20% 352 64% 0.926 90 16% 92 14% 564 84% 0.912 15 2% 139 16% 669 77% 0.981 63 7% 2,579 0.959 APP DEPART 485 473 552 506 671 782 871 818 0 4:00 PM 17 63 40 34 70 18 20 219 8 35 149 14 687 4:15 PM 21 71 45 25 76 17 23 206 11 22 144 13 674 4:30 PM ------- 14 74 36 33 90 22 30 238 9 31 154 10 741 4:45 PM 26 77 33 44 89 17 27 220 7 29 142 19 730 5:00 PM 24 70 46 27 104 19 27 210 11 32 135 11 716 5:15 PM 13 82 1 45 37 94 19 27 256 6 29 130 14 752 5:30 PM 20 72 36 47 96 23 23 224 8 27 122 15 713 5:45 PM 19 1 84 36 35 72 19 17 225 7 33 137 14 698 VOLUMES APPROACH % 154 14% 593 56% 317 30% 282 25% 691 61% 154 14% 194 90/0 1,798 870/o 67 3% 238 16% 1,113 76% 110 8% 5,711 APP DEPART 1,064 897 1,127 996 2,059 2,397 1,461 1,421 0 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES APPROACH % PEAK HR FACTOR 77 14% 4:30 PM 303 56% 0.964 160 30% 141 24% 377 63% 0.992 77 13% ill 10% 924 87% 0.924 33 3% 121 16% 561 76% 0.944 54 7% 2,939 0.977 APP DEPART 1 540 1 468 1 595 531 1 0 6 �8 1,225 1 736 715 0 APPENDIX B EXISTING CONDITIONS INTERSECTION ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS EXAM Wed Nov 6, 2013 13:50:35 Page 3 -1 TTM72195 TIA Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Merced Ave /Ramona Blvd ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.469 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 32 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------- - - - - -I Control: Protected Protected Prot +Permit Prot +Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- 11--------------- 11--------------- ! Volume Module: Base Vol: 78 227 44 77 267 64 64 459 50 18 565 57 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 78 227 44 77 267 64 64 459 50 18 565 57 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 78 227 44 77 267 64 64 459 50 18 565 57 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 78 227 44 77 267 64 64 459 50 18 565 57 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 78 227 44 77 267 64 64 459 50 18 565 57 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.68 0.32 1.00 1.61 0.39 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 2680 520 1600 2581 619 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 ------------ I--------------- 11--------------- II--------------- 11---------- - - - - -1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.05 0.08 0.08 0.05 0.10 0.10 0.04 0.14 0.03 0.01 0.18 0.04 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering EXAM Wed Nov 6, 2013 13:50:35 Page 4 -1 TTM72195 TIA Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour ----------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Baldwin Park Blvd /Ramona Blvd Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.531 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 35 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- --------------- Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 ------------ --------------- il--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Volume Module: Base Vol: 59 318 108 110 353 90 92 564 15 139 669 63 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 59 318 108 110 353 90 92 564 15 139 669 63 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 59 318 108 110 353 90 92 564 15 139 669 63 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 59 318 108 110 353 90 92 564 15 139 669 63 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 59 318 108 110 353 90 92 564 15 139 669 63 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.04 0.10 0.07 0.07 0.11 0.06 0.06 0.18 0.01 0.09 0.21 0.04 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering EXAM Wed Nov 6, 2013 13:50:35 Page 5 -1 TTM72195 TIA Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour ----------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Intersection #3 Baldwin Park Blvd /Merced Ave ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.571 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 38 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L -- T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II----------- - - - - II ---- - - - - -I Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II------------ - - -II- ---- - - - - -I Volume Module: Base Vol: 74 425 69 163 624 43 51 302 95 147 332 135 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 74 425 69 163 624 43 51 302 95 147 332 135 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 74 425 69 163 624 43 51 302 95 147 332 135 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 74 425 69 163 624 43 51 302 95 147 332 135 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 74 425 69 163 624 43 51 302 95 147 332 135 ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.72 0.28 1.00 1.87 0.13 1.00 1.52 0.48 1.00 1.42 0.58 Final Sat.: 1600 2753 447 1600 2994 206 1600 2434 766 1600 2275 925 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II---------- - - - - - I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.05 0.15 0.15 0.10 0.21 0.21 0.03 0.12 0.12 0.09 0.15 0.15 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering EXAM Wed Nov 6, 2013 13:50:35 Page 6 -1 TTM72195 TIA Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour ----------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Intersection 44 Baldwin Park Blvd /Foster Ave Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.487 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 33 Level Of Service: A ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ -------------- -II --------------- --------- II---------- - - - - -I Control: Prot +Permit Prot +Permit Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- --------------- Volume Module: Base Vol: 71 357 9 17 704 60 60 120 142 16 90 15 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 71 357 9 17 704 60 60 120 142 16 90 15 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 71 357 9 17 704 60 60 120 142 16 90 15 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 71 357 9 17 704 60 60 120 142 16 90 15 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 71 357 9 17 704 60 60 120 142 16 90 15 ------------ I--------------- ll--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.33 0.67 1.00 0.15 0.85 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 533 1067 1600 242 1358 1600 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II---------- - - - - - I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.04 0.11 0.01 0.01 0.22 0.04 0.04 0.11 0.09 0.01 0.07 0.01 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering EXAM Wed Nov 6, 2013 13:50:35 Page 7 -1 TTM72195 TIA Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 Vineland Ave /Merced Ave Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.545 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 36 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------- - - - - -I ------ II- - - - - -- - II--------------- II---------- - - - - -I Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------- - - - - -I ------- II - - - - -- - II--------------- II---------- - - - - -! Volume Module: Base Vol: 79 113 51 49 152 115 79 277 71 33 412 30 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 79 113 51 49 152 115 79 277 71 33 412 30 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 79 113 51 49 152 115 79 277 71 33 412 30 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 79 113 51 49 152 115 79 277 71 33 412 30 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 79 113 51 49 152 115 79 277 71 33 412 30 ------------ --------------- II------ --------------- II---------- - - - - - i Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.33 0.46 0.21 0.16 0.48 0.36 0.37 1.30 0.33 0.14 1.73 0.13 Final Sat.: 520 744 336 248 770 582 592 2076 532 222 2776 202 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.05 0.15 0.15 0.03 0.20 0.20 0.05 0.13 0.13 0.02 0.15 0.15 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering EXPM Wed Nov 6, 2013 13:50:42 Page 3 -1 TTM72195 TIA Existing Conditions PM Peak Hour ----------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Merced Ave /Ramona Blvd ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.527 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 35 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------- - - - - -I -------- I!--- - - - - -- II -------------- - II - -- - - - - -! Control: Protected Protected Prot +Permit Prot +Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 ------------ I -------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Volume Module: Base Vol: 49 250 60 81 292 44 89 818 92 38 387 57 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 49 250 60 81 292 44 89 818 92 38 387 57 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 49 250 60 81 292 44 89 818 92 38 387 57 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 49 250 60 81 292 44 89 818 92 38 387 57 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 49 250 60 81 292 44 89 818 92 38 387 57 ------------ --------------- II---------- --------------- II---------- - - - - - ! Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.61 0.39 1.00 1.74 0.26 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 2581 619 1600 2781 419 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 ------- - - - - -I -------- II- - - - - -- --!!--------------- II---------- - - - - -I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.03 0.10 0.10 0.05 0.11 0.10 0.06 0.26 0.06 0.02 0.12 0.04 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering EXPM Wed Nov 6, 2013 13:50:42 Page 4 -1 TTM72195 TIA Existing Conditions PM Peak Hour ----------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Baldwin Park Blvd /Ramona Blvd Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.653 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 45 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - ( Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 ------------ --------------- il--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Volume Module: Base Vol: 77 303 160 141 377 77 111 924 33 121 561 54 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 77 303 160 141 377 77 111 924 33 121 561 54 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 77 303 160 141 377 77 111 924 33 121 561 54 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 77 303 160 141 377 77 111 924 33 121 561 54 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 77 303 160 141 377 77 111 924 33 121 561 54 ------------ --------------- --------------- II--------------- il---------- - - - - - I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.05 0.09 0.10 0.09 0.12 0.05 0.07 0.29 0.02 0.08 0.18 0.03 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering EXPM Wed Nov 6, 2013 13:50:42 Page 5 -1 TTM72195 TIA Existing Conditions PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Baldwin Park Blvd /Merced Ave Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.578 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 38 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II----------- - - - - II - - - -I Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Volume Module: Base Vol: 106 485 111 198 422 28 40 343 74 60 315 114 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 106 485 111 198 422 28 40 343 74 60 315 114 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 106 485 111 198 422 28 40 343 74 60 315 114 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 106 485 111 198 422 28 40 343 74 60 315 114 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 106 485 111 198 422 28 40 343 74 60 315 114 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.63 0.37 1.00 1.88 0.12 1.00 1.65 0.35 1.00 1.47 0.53 Final Sat.: 1600 2604 596 1600 3001 199 1600 2632 568 1600 2350 850 ------------ I --------------- II- - - - - -- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.07 0.19 0.19 0.12 0.14 0.14 0.03 0.13 0.13 0.04 0.13 0.13 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering EXPM Wed Nov 6, 2013 13:50:42 Page 6 -1 TTM72195 TIA Existing Conditions PM Peak Hour ----------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Baldwin Park Blvd /Foster Ave Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.359 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 27 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R -------- - - - - I --------------- --------- II --------------- II ---------- - - - - - I Control: Prot +Permit Prot +Permit Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 ------- - - - - -I ------- II-- - - - - -- - II--------------- II---------- - - - - -I Volume Module: Base Vol: 71 547 24 11 504 32 27 43 31 13 51 21 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 71 547 24 11 504 32 27 43 31 13 51 21 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 71 547 24 11 504 32 27 43 31 13 51 21 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 71 547 24 11 504 32 27 43 31 13 51 21 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 71 547 24 11 504 32 27 43 31 13 51 21 -------- - - - -I--------------- --------- --------------- II---------- - - - - -I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.39 0.61 1.00 0.20 0.80 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 617 983 1600 325 1275 1600 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.04 0.17 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.04 0.01 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering EXPM Wed Nov 6, 2013 13:50:42 Page 7 -1 TTM72195 TIA Existing Conditions PM Peak Hour ----------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 Vineland Ave /Merced Ave Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.425 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 30 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------- - - - - -I ------- II - - - - -- --------------- II---------- - - - - -I Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------- - - - - -I ------- II-- - - - - -- - II--------------- II---------- - - - - -I Volume Module: Base Vol: 64 105 20 41 83 47 55 315 48 17 405 38 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 64 105 20 41 83 47 55 315 48 17 405 38 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 64 105 20 41 83 47 55 315 48 17 405 38 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 64 105 20 41 83 47 55 315 48 17 405 38 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 64 105 20 41 83 47 55 315 48 17 405 38 ------------ --------------- II- - - - - -- - II--------------- II---------- - - - - -I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.34 0.55 0.11 0.24 0.49 0.27 0.26 1.51 0.23 0.07 1.76 0.17 Final Sat.: 542 889 169 384 777 440 421. 2411 367 118 2817 264 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- --------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.04 0.12 0.12 0.03 0.11 0.11 0.03 0.13 0.13 0.01 0.14 0.14 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering APPENDIX C EXISTING PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS EXAMWP Wed Nov 6, 2013 13:40:51 Page 3 -1 TTM72195 TIA Existing Plus Project Conditions AM Peak Hour ----------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Merced Ave /Ramona Blvd Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.472 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 32 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------------ II - - - - -- II --------------- II---------- - - - - - I Control: Protected Protected Prot +Permit Prot +Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Volume Module: Base Vol: 78 227 44 77 267 64 64 459 50 18 565 57 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 78 227 44 77 267 64 64 459 50 18 565 57 Added Vol: 4 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 82 230 44 77 268 64 64 459 51 18 565 57 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 82 230 44 77 268 64 64 459 51 18 565 57 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 82 230 44 77 268 64 64 459 51 18 565 57 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 82 230 44 77 268 64 64 459 51 18 565 57 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.68 0.32 1.00 1.61 0.39 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 2686 514 1600 2583 617 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II---------- - - - - -I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.05 0.09 0.09 0.05 0.10 0.10 0.04 0.14 0.03 0.01 0.18 0.04 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering EXAMWP Wed Nov 6, 2013 13:40:51 Page 4 -1 TTM72195 TIA Existing Plus Project Conditions AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection 42 Baldwin Park Blvd /Ramona Blvd ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.532 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 35 Level Of Service: A ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II--------------- il --------------- II ---------- - - - - - I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 ------------ I ------------ - - -II- ----------- - - - -II Volume Module: Base Vol: 59 318 108 110 353 90 92 564 15 139 669 63 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 59 318 108 110 353 90 92 564 15 139 669 63 Added Vol: 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 59 319 111 110 353 90 92 564 15 140 669 63 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 59 319 111 110 353 90 92 564 15 140 669 63 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 59 319 111 110 353 90 92 564 15 140 669 63 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 59 319 111 110 353 90 92 564 15 140 669 63 ------------- --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II--------------- i Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.04 0.10 0.07 0.07 0.11 0.06 0.06 0.18 0.01 0.09 0.21 0.04 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering EXAMWP Wed Nov 6, 2013 13:40:51 Page 5 -1 TTM72195 TIA Existing Plus Project Conditions AM Peak Hour ----------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Baldwin Park Blvd /Merced Ave Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.578 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): x_xxxxx Optimal Cycle: 38 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II------------ - - -II- - it - - - -- Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I --------------- II----------- - - - -II ---- - - - -II - - - - -I Volume Module: Base Vol: 74 425 69 163 624 43 51 302 95 147 332 135 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 74 425 69 163 624 43 51 302 95 147 332 135 Added Vol: 3 0 0 0 0 1 4 7 9 0 2 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 77 425 69 163 624 44 55 309 104 147 334 135 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Ad!: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 77 425 69 163 624 44 55 309 104 147 334 135 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 77 425 69 163 624 44 55 309 104 147 334 135 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 77 425 69 163 624 44 55 309 104 147 334 135 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II------------ - - -II- -- - - - - -I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.72 0.28 1.00 1.87 0.13 1.00 1.50 0.50 1.00 1.42 0.58 Final Sat.: 1600 2753 447 1600 2989 211 1600 2394 806 1600 2279 921 ------------ I --------------- II------------ - - -II- -- II - - - -- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.05 0.15 0.15 0.10 0.21 0.21 0.03 0.13 0.13 0.09 0.15 0.15 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering EXAMWP Wed Nov 6, 2013 13:40:51 Page 6 -1 TTM72195 TIA Existing Plus Project Conditions AM Peak Hour ----------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Baldwin Park Blvd /Foster Ave Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.489 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 33 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ---------------------------II---------------11---------------II------ Control: Prot +Permit Prot +Permit Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Volume Module: Base Vol: 71 357 9 17 704 60 60 120 142 16 90 15 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 71 357 9 17 704 60 60 120 142 16 90 15 Added Vol: 0 3 0 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 71 360 9 18 712 60 60 120 142 16 90 15 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 71 360 9 18 712 60 60 120 142 16 90 15 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 71 360 9 18 712 60 60 120 142 16 90 15 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 71 360 9 18 712 60 60 120 142 16 90 15 ------- - - - - -I --- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.33 0.67 1.00 0.15 0.85 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 533 1067 1600 242 1358 1600 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.04 0.11 0.01 0.01 0.22 0.04 0.04 0.11 0.09 0.01 0.07 0.01 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering EXAMWP Wed Nov 6, 2013 13:40:51 Page 7 -1 TTM72195 TIA Existing Plus Project Conditions AM Peak Hour ----------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 Vineland Ave /Merced Ave ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.546 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 36 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II ---------- - - - - - I Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Volume Module: Base Vol: 79 113 51 49 152 115 79 277 71 33 412 30 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 79 113 51 49 152 115 79 277 71 33 412 30 Added Vol: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 0 1 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 80 113 51 49 152 115 79 281 74 33 413 30 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 80 113 51 49 152 115 79 281 74 33 413 30 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 80 113 51 49 152 115 79 281 74 33 413 30 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 80 113 51 49 152 115 79 281 74 33 413 30 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.33 0.46 0.21 0.16 0.48 0.36 0.36 1.30 0.34 0.14 1.73 0.13 Final Sat.: 525 741 334 248 770 582 582 2072 546 222 2776 202 ------------ I - - - - -- - II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.05 0.15 0.15 0.03 0.20 0.20 0.05 0.14 0.14 0.02 0.15 0.15 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering EXPMWP Wed Nov 6, 2013 13:40:21 Page 3 -1 TTM72195 TIA Existing Plus Project Conditions PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Merced Ave /Ramona Blvd Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.528 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 35 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II---------- - - - - - I Control: Protected Protected Prot +Permit Prot +Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 - ---------------II---------------11---------------II------- Volume Module: Base Vol: 49 250 60 81 292 44 89 818 92 38 387 57 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 49 250 60 81 292 44 89 818 92 38 387 57 Added Vol: 3 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Put: 52 252 60 81 295 44 89 818 96 38 387 57 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 52 252 60 81 295 44 89 818 96 38 387 57 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 52 252 60 81 295 44 89 818 96 38 387 57 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 52 252 60 81 295 44 89 818 96 38 387 57 ---------------- II--------------- II-- - - - - -- II---------- - - - - -I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.62 0.38 1.00 1.74 0.26 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 2585 615 1600 2785 415 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 ------------ I--------------- 11----------- - - - -II ---------- II---------- - - - - -I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.03 0.10 0.10 0.05 0.11 0.11 0.06 0.26 0.06 0.02 0.12 0.04 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering EXPMWP Wed Nov 6, 2013 13:40:21 Page 4 -1 TTM72195 TIA Existing Plus Project Conditions PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Intersection #2 Baldwin Park Blvd /Ramona Blvd ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.649 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 44 Level Of Service: B ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- II--------------- II- - - - - -- II---------- - - - - -I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 ------------ --------------- II----------- - - - -II - II-- - - - - -- Volume Module: Base Vol: 77 303 160 141 377 77 111 924 33 121 561 54 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 77 303 160 141 377 77 111 924 33 121 561 54 Added Vol: 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 77 304 162 141 378 77 111 924 33 124 561 54 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 77 304 162 141 378 77 111 924 33 124 561 54 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 77 304 162 141 378 77 111 924 33 124 561 54 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 77 304 162 141 378 77 111 924 33 124 561 54 ------------ I--------------- II----------- - - - -II -- II- - - - - -- Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.05 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.12 0.05 0.07 0.29 0.02 0.08 0.18 0.03 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering EXPMWP Wed Nov 6, 2013 13:40:21 Page 5 -1 TTM72195 TIA Existing Plus Project Conditions PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length °) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Baldwin Park Blvd /Merced Ave ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.581 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 39 Level Of Service: A ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II------------ - - -II--------------- --------------- Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- Volume Module: Base Vol: 106 485 ill 198 422 28 40 343 74 60 315 114 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 106 485 111 198 422 28 40 343 74 60 315 114 Added Vol: 10 0 0 0 0 4 3 4 6 0 7 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fiat: 116 485 111 198 422 32 43 347 80 60 322 114 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.00 PHF Volume: 116 485 111 198 422 32 43 347 80 60 322 114 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 116 485 ill 198 422 32 43 347 80 60 322 114 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 116 485 111 198 422 32 43 347 80 60 322 114 ------------ ---- - - - - -- II--------------- II----------- - - - -II - - - - - -I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.63 0.37 1.00 1.86 0.14 1.00 1.63 0.37 1.00 1.48 0.52 Final Sat.: 1600 2604 596 1600 2974 226 1600 2600 600 1600 2363 837 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II - - -- ---- II - - - - -- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.07 0.19 0.19 0.12 0.14 0.14 0.03 0.13 0.13 0.04 0.14 0.14 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering EXPMWP Wed Nov 6, 2013 13:40:22 Page 6 -1 TTM72195 TIA Existing Plus Project Conditions PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Baldwin Park Blvd /Foster Ave Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.360 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 27 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --- - - - - -- - II - - - -- --- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -I Control: Prot +Permit Prot +Permit Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 ------------ -------------- -II - -- ------ II---- - - - - -- --- ------------ Volume Module: Base Vol: 71 547 24 11 504 32 27 43 31 13 51 21 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 71 547 24 11 504 32 27 43 31 13 51 21 Added Vol: 0 9 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 71 556 24 12 509 32 27 43 31 13 51 22 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 71 556 24 12 509 32 27 43 31 13 51 22 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 71 556 24 12 509 32 27 43 31 13 51 22 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 71 556 24 12 509 32 27 43 31 13 51 22 ------------ I - - - - -- -- - -II -- -------- II------------ - - -II- ---- - - - - -I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.39 0.61 1.00 0.20 0.80 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 617 983 1600 325 1275 1600 ------------ I ---- - - - - -- II - - - - -- - - -II ---------- II---------- - - - - -I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.04 0.17 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.04 0.01 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering EXPMWP Wed Nov 6, 2013 13:40:22 Page 7 -1 TTM72195 TIA Existing Plus Project Conditions PM Peak Hour ----------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 Vineland Ave /Merced Ave Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.428 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 30 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- - - - -- - I--------------- II--------------- II-------------- II---------- - - - - - Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Volume Module: Base Vol: 64 105 20 41 83 47 55 315 48 17 405 38 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 64 105 20 41 83 47 55 315 48 17 405 38 Added Vol: 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 4 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 67 105 20 41 83 47 55 318 50 17 409 38 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 67 105 20 41 83 47 55 318 50 17 409 38 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 67 105 20 41 83 47 55 318 50 17 409 38 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 67 105 20 41 83 47 55 318 50 17 409 38 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.35 0.55 0.10 0.24 0.49 0.27 0.26 1.50 0.24 0.07 1.77 0.16 Final Sat.: 558 875 167 384 777 440 416 2406 378 117 2821 262 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.04 0.12 0.12 0.03 0.11 0.11 0.03 0.13 0.13 0.01 0.14 0.14 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * *+ Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering APPENDIX D PROJECT OPENING YEAR (2UlS) WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS INTERSECTION ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS 15NPAM Wed Nov 6, 2013 13:57:01 Page 3 -1 TTM72195 TIA Forecast Year 2015 Without Project Conditions AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Merced Ave /Ramona Blvd Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.475 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 32 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------------- II----------- - - - -II ---------- II---------- - - - - -I Control: Protected Protected Prot +Permit Prot +Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Volume Module: Base Vol: 78 227 44 77 267 64 64 459 50 18 565 57 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 79 231 45 78 271 65 65 467 51 18 574 58 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 79 231 45 78 271 65 65 467 51 18 574 58 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 79 231 45 78 271 65 65 467 51 18 574 58 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 79 231 45 78 271 65 65 467 51 18 574 58 ---------------------------II---------------11---------------II--------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.68 0.32 1.00 1.61 0.39 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 2680 520 1600 2581 619 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- Il--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.05 0.09 0.09 0.05 0.11 0.11 0.04 0.15 0.03 0.01 0.18 0.04 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering 15NPAM Wed Nov 6, 2013 13:57:01 Page 4 -1 TTM72195 TIA Forecast Year 2015 Without Project Conditions AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Baldwin Park Blvd /Ramona Blvd. Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.538 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 36 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- II - - - - -- --- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -i Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 ------------ -------------- -II - -- ---- - - -II--------------- --------------- Volume Module: Base Vol: 59 318 108 110 353 90 92 564 15 139 669 63 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 60 323 110 112 359 91 94 573 15 141 680 64 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 60 323 110 112 359 91 94 573 15 141 680 64 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 60 323 110 112 359 91 94 573 15 141 680 64 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 60 323 110 112 359 91 94 573 15 141 680 64 ------------ -------------- -II - -- ---- - - -II--------------- --------------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 ------------ I --------------- II--- - - - - -- II---------------II--------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.04 0.10 0.07 0.07 0.11 0.06 0.06 0.18 0.01 0.09 0.21 0.04 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering 15NPAM Wed Nov 6, 2013 13:57:01 Page 5 -1 TTM72195 TIA Forecast. Year 2015 Without Project Conditions AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Baldwin Park Blvd /Merced Ave Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.580 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 38 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II - - -- ------ II--------------- II---------- - - - - -I Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- 11--------------- --------------- Volume Module: Base Vol: 74 425 69 163 624 43 51 302 95 147 332 135 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 75 432 70 166 634 44 52 307 97 149 337 137 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 75 432 70 166 634 44 52 307 97 149 337 137 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 75 432 70 166 634 44 52 307 97 149 337 137 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 75 432 70 166 634 44 52 307 97 149 337 137 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- --------------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.72 0.28 1.00 1.87 0.13 1.00 1.52 0.48 1.00 1.42 0.58 Final Sat.: 1600 2753 447 1600 2994 206 1600 2434 766 1600 2275 925 ------- - - - - -I ---------- II - - - - -- ---- II--------------- II-- - - - - -- I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.05 0.16 0.16 0.10 0.21 0.21 0.03 0.13 0.13 0.09 0.15 0.15 Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering 15NPAM Wed Nov 6, 2013 13:57:01 Page 6 -1 TTM72195 TIA Forecast Year 2015 Without Project Conditions AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Baldwin Park Blvd /Foster Ave Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.493 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 33 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II -- - - - - -- -- II---------- - - - - -I Control: Prot +Permit Prot +Permit Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II - - - -- ---- II-- - - - - -- - -I Volume Module: Base Vol: 71 357 9 17 704 60 60 120 142 16 90 15 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 72 363 9 17 716 61 61 122 144 16 91 15 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 72 363 9 17 716 61 61 122 144 16 91 15 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 72 363 9 17 716 61 61 122 144 16 91 15 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 72 363 9 17 716 61 61 122 144 16 91 15 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II --------------- --------------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.33 0.67 1.00 0.15 0.85 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 533 1067 1600 242 1358 1600 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.05 0.11 0.01 0.01 0.22 0.04 0.04 0.11 0.09 0.01 0.07 0.01 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering 15NPAM Wed Nov 6, 2013 13:57 :01 Page 7 -1 TTM72195 TIA Forecast Year 2015 Without Project Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 Vineland Ave /Merced Ave ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.552 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 36 Level Of Service: A ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ----------- I ---------------II--------------- II --------------- II --------------- Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Volume Module: Base Vol: 79 113 51 49 152 115 79 277 71 33 412 30 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 80 115 52 50 155 117 80 282 72 34 419 30 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 80 115 52 50 155 117 80 282 72 34 419 30 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 80 115 52 50 155 117 80 282 72 34 419 30 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 80 115 52 50 155 117 80 282 72 34 419 30 ------------ ---------------II---------------II---------------II--- Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.33 0.46 0.21 0.16 0.48 0.36 0.37 1.30 0.33 0.14 1.73 0.13 Final Sat.: 520 744 336 248 770 582 592 2076 532 222 2776 202 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II---------- - - - - - I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.05 0.15 0.15 0.03 0.20 0.20 0.05 0.14 0.14 0.02 0.15 0.15 Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering 15NPPM Wed Nov 6, 2013 13:57:06 Page 3 -1 TTM72195 TIA Forecast Year 2015 Without Project Conditions PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection 41 Merced Ave /Ramona Blvd * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.534 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 35 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ -------- li--------------- --------------- --------------- I Control: Protected Protected Prot +Permit Prot +Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 ------------ ---- ----- II - - - -- --- II - - -- --- II - - -- - - - - -I Volume Module: Base Vol: 49 250 60 81 292 44 89 818 92 38 387 57 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 50 254 61 82 297 45 90 831 94 39 393 58 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 50 254 61 82 297 45 90 831 94 39 393 58 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 50 254 61 82 297 45 90 831 94 39 393 58 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fin.alVolume: 50 254 61 82 297 45 90 831 94 39 393 58 ------------ ------------- - -II -- --- - -II -- -- - - -II- - - - - -I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.61 0.39 1.00 1.74 0.26 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 2581 619 1600 2781 419 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 - - - - -- I--- - - - - -- II --------------- II ---- - - - - -- II-- - - - - -- - -I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.03 0.10 0.10 0.05 0.11 0.11 0.06 0.26 0.06 0.02 0.12 0.04 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering 15NPPM Wed Nov 6, 2013 13:57:06 Page 4 -1 TTM72195 TIA Forecast Year 2015 Without Project Conditions PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Baldwin Park Blvd /Ramona Blvd Cycle (sec): 100 Critical. Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.656 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 45 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T -- R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- --------------- - - - - -II - - - -I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1, 0 2 0 1 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II----------- - - - -II - - - - - -I Volume Module: Base Vol: 77 303 160 141 377 77 111 924 33 121 561 54 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 78 308 163 143 383 78 113 939 34 123 570 55 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 78 308 163 143 383 78 113 939 34 123 570 55 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 78 308 163 143 383 78 113 939 34 123 570 55 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 78 308 163 143 383 78 113 939 34 123 570 55 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 ------------ I --------------- II------------ - - -II- ---- II - - - - -- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.05 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.12 0.05 0.07 0.29 0.02 0.08 0.18 0.03 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering 15NPPM Wed Nov 6, 2013 13:57:06 Page 5 -1 TTM72195 TIA Forecast Year 2015 Without Project Conditions PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Baldwin Park Blvd /Merced Ave Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.586 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 39 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ ---------------li---------------II---------------il------- Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II - - - - -- I Volume Module: Base Vol: 106 485 111 198 422 28 40 343 74 60 315 114 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 108 493 113 201 429 28 41 349 75 61 320 116 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 108 493 113 201 429 28 41 349 75 61 320 116 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 108 493 113 201 429 28 41 349 75 61 320 116 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 108 493 113 201 429 28 41 349 75 61 320 116 ------------ ---------------II---------------II---------------II------ Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.63 0.37 1.00 1.88 0.12 1.00 1.65 0.35 1.00 1.47 0.53 Final Sat.: 1600 2604 596 1600 3001 199 1600 2632 568 1600 2350 850 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.07 0.19 0.19 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.03 0.13 0.13 0.04 0.14 0.14 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering 15NPPM Wed Nov 6, 2013 13:57:06 Page 6 -1 TTM72195 TIA Forecast Year 2015 Without Project Conditions PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Baldwin Park Blvd /Foster Ave ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.363 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 27 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ i --------------- II----------- - - - -II --- II-- - - - - -- Control: Prot +Permit Prot +Permit Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 ------------ ---------------II---------------II---------------II------ Volume Module: Base Vol: 71 547 24 11 504 32 27 43 31 13 51 21 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 72 556 24 1.1 512 33 27 44 32 13 52 21 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 72 556 24 11 512 33 27 44 32 13 52 21 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 72 556 24 11 512 33 27 44 32 13 52 21 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 72 556 24 11 512 33 27 44 32 13 52 21 ---------------------------II---------------11---------------II------ Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.39 0.61 1.00 0.20 0.80 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 617 983 1600 325 1275 1600 ------------ I--------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.05 0.17 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.04 0.01 Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering 15NPPM Wed Nov 6, 2013 13:57:06 Page 7 -1 TTM72195 TIA Forecast Year 2015 Without Project Conditions PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 Vineland Ave /Merced Ave Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.430 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 30 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ ---------------II---------------II---------------II------ Volume Module: Base Vol: 64 105 20 41 83 47 55 315 48 17 405 38 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 65 107 20 42 84 48 56 320 49 17 412 39 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 65 107 20 42 84 48 56 320 49 17 412 39 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 65 107 20 42 84 48 56 320 49 17 412 39 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 65 107 20 42 84 48 56 320 49 17 412 39 ------------ ---------------II---------------II---------------II------ Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.34 0.55 0.11 0.24 0.49 0.27 0.26 1.51 0.23 0.07 1.76 0.17 Final Sat.: 542 889 169 384 777 440 421 2411 367 118 2817 264 ------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.04 0.12 0.12 0.03 0.11 0.11 0.03 0.13 0.13 0.01 0.15 0.15 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering APPENDIX E PROJECT OPENING YEAR (2015) WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS INTERSECTION ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS 15WPAM Wed Nov 6, 2013 13:58:12 Page 3 -1 TTM72195 TIA Forecast Year 2015 With Project Conditions AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Merced Ave /Ramona Blvd Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.478 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 32 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ ------------- - -II -- - - - - -II - - - -II - - - - - -I Control: Protected Protected Prot +Permit Prot +Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 ------------ ----------- - - - -II ---------- II--------------- 11---------- - - - - -I Volume Module: Base Vol: 78 227 44 77 267 64 64 459 50 18 565 57 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 79 231 45 78 271 65 65 467 51 18 574 58 Added Vol: 4 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 83 234 45 78 272 65 65 467 52 18 574 58 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Ad3: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 83 234 45 78 272 65 65 467 52 18 574 58 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 83 234 45 78 272 65 65 467 52 18 574 58 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 83 234 45 78 272 65 65 467 52 18 574 58 --------------------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------- - - - - -I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.68 0.32 1.00 1.61 0.39 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 2686 514 1600 2583 617 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 ------------ I ------------- - -II -- - - - - -II - - - -II - - - - - -I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.05 0.09 0.09 0.05 0.11 0.11 0.04 0.15 0.03 0.01 0.18 0.04 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering 15WPAM Wed Nov 6, 2013 13:58:12 Page 4 -1 TTM72195 TIA Forecast Year 2015 With Project Conditions AM Peak Hour Level. Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Baldwin Park Blvd /Ramona Blvd Cycle (sec): 100 Critical. Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.539 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 36 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ ---------------II---------------II---------------II------ Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 ----------- -I - - -- -----II---------------II---------------II- Volume Module: Base Vol: 59 318 108 1.10 353 90 92 564 15 139 669 63 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 60 323 110 112 359 91 94 573 15 141 680 64 Added Vol: 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 60 324 113 112 359 91 94 573 15 142 680 64 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 60 324 113 112 359 91 94 573 15 142 680 64 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 60 324 113 112 359 91 94 573 15 142 680 64 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 60 324 113 112 359 91 94 573 15 142 680 64 --------------------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.04 0.10 0.07 0.07 0.11 0.06 0.06 0.18 0.01 0.09 0.21 0.04 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering 15WPAM Wed Nov 6, 2013 13:58:12 Page 5 -1 TTM72195 TIA Forecast Year 2015 With Project Conditions AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Baldwin Park Blvd /Merced Ave Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.585 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 39 Level Of Service: A ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ ---------------II---------------II---------------II--- Volume Module: Base Vol: 74 425 69 163 624 43 51 302 95 147 332 135 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 75 432 70 1.66 634 44 52 307 97 149 337 137 Added Vol: 3 0 0 0 0 1 4 7 9 0 2 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Put: 78 432 70 166 634 45 56 314 106 149 339 137 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Ad!: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 78 432 70 166 634 45 56 314 106 149 339 137 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 78 432 70 166 634 45 56 314 106 149 339 137 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 78 432 70 166 634 45 56 314 106 149 339 137 ------------ ---------------II---------------II---------------II--- Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.72 0.28 1.00 1.87 0.13 1.00 1.50 0.50 1.00 1.42 0.58 Final Sat.: 1600 2753 447 1600 2989 211 1600 2395 805 1600 2279 921 ------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.05 0.16 0.16 0.10 0.21 0.21 0.03 0.13 0.13 0.09 0.15 0.15 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering 15WPAM Wed Nov 6, 2013 13:58:12 Page 6 -1 TTM72195 TIA Forecast Year 2015 With Project Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level. Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length °) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Baldwin Park Blvd /Foster Ave Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.496 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 33 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------!--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Control: Prot +Permit Prot +Permit Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 ------------ --------------- !!--------------- II--------------- !!--------------- I Volume Module: Base Vol: 71 357 9 17 704 60 60 120 142 16 90 15 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 72 363 9 17 716 61 61 122 144 16 91 15 Added Vol: 0 3 0 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 72 366 9 18 724 61 61 122 144 16 91 15 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 72 366 9 18 724 61 61 122 144 16 91 15 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 72 366 9 18 724 61 61 122 144 16 91 15 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 72 366 9 18 724 61 61 122 144 16 91 15 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.33 0.67 1.00 0.15 0.85 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 533 1067 1600 242 1358 1600 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- !!--------------- II - - - - -- I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.05 0.11 0.01 0.01 0.23 0.04 0.04 0.11 0.09 0.01 0.07 0.01 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering 15WPAM Wed Nov 6, 2013 13:58:12 Page 7 -1 TTM72195 TIA Forecast Year 2015 With Project Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 Vineland Ave /Merced Ave Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.553 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 37 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------- - - - - -I Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- il--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Volume Module: Base Vol: 79 113 51, 49 152 115 79 277 71 33 412 30 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 80 115 52 50 155 117 80 282 72 34 419 30 Added Vol: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 0 1 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 81 115 52 50 155 117 80 286 75 34 420 30 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 81 115 52 50 155 117 80 286 75 34 420 30 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 81 115 52 50 155 117 80 286 75 34 420 30 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 81 115 52 50 155 117 80 286 75 34 420 30 ----------- --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.33 0.46 0.21 0.16 0.48 0.36 0.36 1.30 0.34 0.14 1.73 0.13 Final Sat.: 525 741 334 248 770 582 583 2072 545 222 2776 202 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.05 0.16 0.16 0.03 0.20 0.20 0.05 0.14 0.14 0.02 0.15 0.15 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering 15WPPM Wed Nov 6, 2013 13:58:18 Page 3 -1 TTM72195 TIA Forecast Year 2015 With Project Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Merced Ave /Ramona Blvd Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.535 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 35 Level Of Service: A ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II---------- - - - - - I Control: Protected Protected Prot +Permit Prot +Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 ------------ I --------------- II- - - - - -- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -I Volume Module: Base Vol: 49 250 60 81 292 44 89 818 92 38 387 57 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 50 254 61 82 297 45 90 831 94 39 393 58 Added Vol: 3 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 53 256 61 82 300 45 90 831 98 39 393 58 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 53 256 61 82 300 45 90 831 98 39 393 58 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 53 256 61 82 300 45 90 831 98 39 393 58 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 53 256 61 82 300 45 90 831 98 39 393 58 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.62 0.38 1.00 1.74 0.26 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 2585 615 1600 2785 415 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 ------------ 1--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.03 0.10 0.10 0.05 0.11 0.11 0.06 0.26 0.06 0.02 0.12 0.04 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering 15WPPM Wed Nov 6, 2013 13:58:18 Page 4 -1 TTM72195 TIA Forecast Year 2015 With Project Conditions PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Baldwin Park Blvd /Ramona Blvd Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.658 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal. Cycle: 45 Level Of Service: B ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- II------------ - - -II- --- II - - -- - - - -I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 ------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- - - - - - -I Volume Module: Base Vol: 77 303 160 1.41 377 77 111 924 33 121 561 54 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 78 308 163 143 383 78 113 939 34 123 570 55 Added Vol: 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 78 309 165 143 384 78 113 939 34 126 570 55 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 78 309 165 143 384 78 113 939 34 126 570 55 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 78 309 165 143 384 78 113 939 34 126 570 55 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 78 309 165 143 384 78 113 939 34 126 570 55 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 ------------ I --------------- II----------- - - - -II ---- II - - -- - - -I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.05 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.12 0.05 0.07 0.29 0.02 0.08 0.18 0.03 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering 15WPPM Wed Nov 6, 2013 13:58:18 Page 5 -1 TTM72195 TIA Forecast Year 2015 With Project Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Baldwin Park Blvd /Merced Ave Cycle (sec): 1.00 Critical. Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.589 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 39 Level Of Service: A ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II ---------- - - - - - I Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I ---------------{ I--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Volume Module: Base Vol: 106 485 ill 198 422 28 40 343 74 60 315 114 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 108 493 113 201 429 28 41 349 75 61 320 11.6 Added Vol: 10 0 0 0 0 4 3 4 6 0 7 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 118 493 113 201 429 32 44 353 81 61 327 116 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 118 493 113 201 429 32 44 353 81 61 327 116 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 118 493 113 201 429 32 44 353 81 61 327 116 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 118 493 113 201 429 32 44 353 81 61 327 116 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.63 0.37 1.00 1.86 0.14 1.00 1.63 0.37 1.00 1.48 0.52 Final Sat.: 1600 2604 596 1600 2975 225 1600 2601 599 1600 2363 837 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.07 0.19 0.19 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.03 0.14 0.14 0.04 0.14 0.14 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering 15WPPM Wed Nov 6, 2013 13:58:18 Page 6 -1 TTM72195 TIA Forecast Year 2015 With Project Conditions PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Baldwin Park Blvd /Foster Ave Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.365 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 27 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------- - - - - -I Control: Prot +Permit Prot +Permit Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II---------- - - - - -I Volume Module: Base Vol: 71 547 24 11 504 32 27 43 31 13 51 21, Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 72 556 24 11 51.2 33 27 44 32 13 52 21 Added Vol: 0 9 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 72 565 24 12 517 33 27 44 32 13 52 22 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 72 565 24 12 517 33 27 44 32 13 52 22 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 72 565 24 12 517 33 27 44 32 13 52 22 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 72 565 24 12 517 33 27 44 32 13 52 22 --------------------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II---------- - - - - -I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.39 0.61 1.00 0.20 0.80 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 617 983 1600 325 1275 1600 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.05 0.18 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.04 0.01 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering 15WPPM Wed Nov 6, 2013 13:58:18 Page 7 -1 TTM72195 TIA Forecast Year 2015 With Project Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Intersection #5 Vineland Ave /Merced Ave ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.433 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 30 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ----- --------------- II--------------- If--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Volume Module: Base Vol: 64 105 20 41 83 47 55 315 48 17 405 38 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 65 107 20 42 84 48 56 320 49 17 412 39 Added Vol: 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 4 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 68 107 20 42 84 48 56 323 51 17 416 39 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 68 107 20 42 84 48 56 323 51 17 416 39 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 68 107 20 42 84 48 56 323 51 17 416 39 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 68 107 20 42 84 48 56 323 51 17 416 39 ---- --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.35 0.55 0.10 0.24 0.49 0.27 0.26 1.50 0.24 0.07 1.77 0.16 Final Sat.: 558 875 167 384 777 440 416 2406 378 117 2821 262 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II ------------- - - fl -- -I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.04 0.12 0.12 0.03 0.11 0.11 0.03 0.13 0.13 0.01 0.15 0.15 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering APPENDIX F FORECAST YEAR 2030 WITHOUT PROTECT CONDITIONS INTERSECTION ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS 30NPAM Wed Nov 6, 2013 14:07:19 Page 3 -1 TTM72195 TIA Forecast Year 2030 Without Project Conditions AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Merced Ave /Ramona Blvd Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.524 Loss Time (sec): 1.0 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 35 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - I - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------- --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------- - - - - - I Control: Protected Protected Prot +Permit Prot +Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Volume Module: Base Vol: 78 227 44 77 267 64 64 459 50 18 565 57 Growth Adj: 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 Initial Bse: 90 261 51 88 307 74 74 527 57 21 649 65 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 90 261 51 88 307 74 74 527 57 21 649 65 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 90 261 51 88 307 74 74 527 57 21 649 65 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 90 261 51 88 307 74 74 527 57 21 649 65 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.68 0.32 1.00 1.61 0.39 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 2680 520 1600 2581 619 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.06 0.10 0.10 0.06 0.12 0.12 0.05 0.16 0.04 0.01 0.20 0.04 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering 30NPAM Wed Nov 6, 2013 14:07:19 Page 4 -1 TTM72195 TIA Forecast Year 2030 Without Project Conditions AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Baldwin Park Blvd /Ramona Blvd Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.599 Loss Time (sec): 1.0 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 40 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- II--------------- 11 --------------- II - -- - --- -I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 - --------------- II----------- - - - -II -- - - - -II - - - - -I Volume Module: Base Vol: 59 318 108 110 353 90 92 564 15 139 669 63 Growth Adj: 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 Initial Bse: 68 365 124 126 406 103 106 648 17 1.60 769 72 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 68 365 124 126 406 103 106 648 17 160 769 72 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 68 365 124 126 406 103 106 648 17 160 769 72 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 68 365 124 126 406 103 106 648 17 160 769 72 - --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 ------------ I ------------- - -II -- --II---------------II------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.04 0.11 0.08 0.08 0.13 0.06 0.07 0.20 0.01 0.10 0.24 0.05 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering 30NPAM Wed Nov 6, 2013 14:07:19 Page 5 -1 TTM72195 TIA Forecast Year 2030 Without Project Conditions AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Baldwin Park Blvd /Merced Ave ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.642 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 44 Level Of Service: B ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------- - - - - - I Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Volume Module: Base Vol: 74 425 69 1.63 624 43 51 302 95 147 332 135 Growth Adj: 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 Initial Bse: 85 488 79 187 717 49 59 347 109 169 381 155 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 85 488 79 187 717 49 59 347 109 169 381 155 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 85 488 79 187 717 49 59 347 109 169 381 155 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 85 488 79 187 717 49 59 347 109 169 381 155 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.72 0.28 1.00 1.87 0.13 1.00 1.52 0.48 1.00 1.42 0.58 Final Sat.: 1600 2753 447 1600 2994 206 1600 2434 766 1600 2275 925 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II- - - - - -- - - -I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.05 0.18 0.18 0.12 0.24 0.24 0.04 0.14 0.14 0.11 0.17 0.17 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering 30NPAM Wed Nov 6, 2013 14 :07:19 Page 6 -1 TTM72195 TIA Forecast Year 2030 Without Project Conditions AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Baldwin Park Blvd /Foster Ave Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.544 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 36 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II----------- - - - -II - II - - -- Control: Prot +permit Prot +Permit Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 ---------------------------11---------------II---- Volume Module: Base Vol: 71 357 9 17 704 60 60 120 142 16 90 15 Growth Adj: 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 Initial Bse: 82 410 10 20 809 69 69 1.38 163 18 103 17 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 82 410 10 20 809 69 69 138 163 18 103 17 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 82 410 10 20 809 69 69 138 163 18 103 17 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 82 410 10 20 809 69 69 138 163 18 103 17 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II-------------- -II - -- I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.33 0.67 1.00 0.15 0.85 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 533 1067 1600 242 1358 1600 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II---------- - - - - - I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.05 0.13 0.01 0.01 0.25 0.04 0.04 0.13 0.10 0.01 0.08 0.01 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering 30NPAM Wed Nov 6, 2013 14:07:19 Page 7 -1 TTM72195 TIA Forecast Year 2030 Without Project Conditions AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Intersection #5 Vineland. Ave /Merced Ave * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.611 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 41 Level Of Service: B ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - I _ R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II-------------- II----------- - - - -II -- - - - - -I Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Volume Module: Base Vol: 79 113 51 49 152 115 79 277 71 33 412 30 Growth Adj: 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 Initial Bse: 91 130 59 56 175 132 91 318 82 38 473 34 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 91 130 59 56 175 132 91 318 82 38 473 34 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 91 130 59 56 175 132 91 318 82 38 473 34 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 91 130 59 56 175 132 91 318 82 38 473 34 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.33 0.46 0.21 0.16 0.48 0.36 0.37 1.30 0.33 0.14 1.73 0.13 Final Sat.: 520 744 336 248 770 582 592 2076 532 222 2776 202 ------------I---------------II---------------11---------------II----- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.06 0.17 0.17 0.04 0.23 0.23 0.06 0.15 0.15 0.02 0.17 0.17 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering 30NPPM Wed Nov 6, 2013 14:07:25 Page 3 -1 TTM72195 TIA Forecast Year 2030 Without Project Condtions PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Merced Ave /Ramona Blvd Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.590 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 39 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------------------------- II-------------- 11--------------- 11--- - - - - -- I Control: Protected Protected Prot +Permit Prot +Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1, 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 ------------ I--------------- II- - - - - -- II--------------- II---- - - - - -- I Volume Module: Base Vol: 49 250 60 81 292 44 89 818 92 38 387 57 Growth Adj: 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 Initial Bse: 56 287 69 93 335 51 102 940 106 44 445 65 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 56 287 69 93 335 51 102 940 106 44 445 65 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 56 287 69 93 335 51 102 940 106 44 445 65 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 56 287 69 93 335 51 102 940 106 44 445 65 ------------ --------------- II-- - - - - -- I---------------II-------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.61 0.39 1.00 1.74 0.26 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 2581 619 1600 2781 419 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 ------------ I ------------ - - -II- ----- - - -II- --- - - - -II ----- - - - - -I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.04 0.11 0.11 0.06 0.12 0.12 0.06 0.29 0.07 0.03 0.14 0.04 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering 30NPPM Wed Nov 6, 2013 14:07:25 Page 4 -1 TTM72195 TIA Forecast Year 2030 Without Project Condtions PM Peak Hour ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Baldwin Park Blvd /Ramona Blvd Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.729 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 54 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -1 Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 ---- I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Volume Module: Base Vol: 77 303 160 141 377 77 111 924 33 121 561 54 Growth Adj: 1.1.5 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 Initial Bse: 88 348 184 162 433 88 128 1062 38 139 645 62 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 88 348 184 162 433 88 128 1062 38 139 645 62 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 88 348 184 162 433 88 128 1062 38 139 645 62 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 88 348 184 162 433 88 128 1062 38 139 645 62 ------------ 1--------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 ------------ I--------------- 11--------------- 11--------------- 11---------- - - - - -1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.06 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.14 0.06 0.08 0.33 0.02 0.09 0.20 0.04 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering 30NPPM Wed Nov 6, 2013 14:07:25 Page 5 -1 TTM72195 TIA Forecast Year 2030 Without Project Condtions PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Intersection #3 Baldwin Park Blvd /Merced Ave ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.649 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 44 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II ---------- - - - - - I Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 106 485 111 Growth Adj: 1.15 1.15 1.15 Initial Bse: 122 557 128 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 122 557 128 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 122 557 128 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 122 557 128 ----I--------------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.63 0.37 Final Sat.: 1600 2604 596 ------------ I --------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.08 0.21 0.21 Crit Moves: * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** 198 422 1.15 1.15 227 485 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 227 485 0 0 227 485 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 227 485 1600 1600 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.88 1600 3001 0.14 0.16 * * ** 28 1.15 32 1.00 1.00 32 0 32 1.00 1.00 32 1600 1.00 0.12 199 0.16 k***** 40 343 1.15 1.15 46 394 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 46 394 0 0 46 394 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 46 394 1600 1600 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.65 1600 2632 0.03 0.15 * * ** 74 1.15 85 1.00 1.00 85 0 85 1.00 1.00 85 1600 1.00 0.35 568 0.15 60 315 114 1.15 1.15 1.15 69 362 131 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 69 362 131 0 0 0 69 362 131 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 69 362 131 II---------- - - - - -I 1600 1600 1600 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.47 0.53 1600 2350 850 II---------- - - - - -I 0.04 0.15 0.15 * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering 30NPPM Wed Nov 6, 2013 14:07:25 Page 6 -1 TTM72195 TIA Forecast Year 2030 Without Project Condtions PM Peak Hour ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Intersection #4 Baldwin Park Blvd /Foster Ave ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.397 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xx_xxxx Optimal Cycle: 28 Level Of Service: A ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------------------------- 11--------------- II----------- - - - -II Control: Prot +Permit Prot +Permit Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Volume Module: Base Vol: 71 547 24 11 504 32 27 43 31 13 51 21 Growth Adj: 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.1.5 1.15 1.15 1.15 Initial Bse: 82 628 28 13 579 37 31 49 36 15 59 24 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 82 628 28 13 579 37 31 49 36 15 59 24 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 82 628 28 13 579 37 31 49 36 15 59 24 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 82 628 28 13 579 37 31 49 36 15 59 24 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.39 0.61 1.00 0.20 0.80 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 617 983 1600 325 1275 1600 ------------ I ---------------II--------------- II ---------------II------ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.05 0.20 0.02 0.01 0.18 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.05 0.02 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering 30NPPM Wed Nov 6, 2013 14:07:25 Page 7 -1 TTM72195 TIA Forecast Year 2030 Without Project Condtions PM Peak Hour Level. Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length °) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Intersection #5 Vineland Ave /Merced Ave Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.470 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 32 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- - -- II--------------- 11---------- - - - - -I Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ----------- --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II-- - - - - -- I Volume Module: Base Vol: 64 105 20 41 83 47 55 315 48 17 405 38 Growth Adj: 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1,.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 Initial Bse: 74 121 23 47 95 54 63 362 55 20 465 44 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 74 121 23 47 95 54 63 362 55 20 465 44 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 74 121 23 47 95 54 63 362 55 20 465 44 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 74 121 23 47 95 54 63 362 55 20 465 44 --------------------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.34 0.55 0.11 0.24 0.49 0.27 0.26 1.51 0.23 0.07 1.76 0.17 Final Sat.: 542 889 169 384 777 440 421 2411 367 118 2817 264 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II----------- - - - -II - - - - -I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.05 0.14 0.14 0.03 0.12 0.12 0.04 0.15 0.15 0.01 0.17 0.17 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering FORECAST YEAR 2030 WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS INTERSECTION ANALYSIS vA ORKSHEE T S 30WPAM Wed Nov 6, 2013 14:07:55 Page 3 -1 TTM72195 TIA Forecast Year 2030 With Project Conditions AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Merced Ave /Ramona Blvd Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.526 Loss Time (sec): 1.0 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 35 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II ---------- - - - - - I Control: Protected Protected Prot +Permit Prot +Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Volume Module: Base Vol: 78 227 44 77 267 64 64 459 50 18 565 57 Growth Adj: 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 Initial Bse: 90 261 51 88 307 74 74 527 57 21 649 65 Added Vol: 4 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Put: 94 264 51 88 308 74 74 527 58 21 649 65 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1•00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 94 264 51 88 308 74 74 527 58 21 649 65 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 94 264 51 88 308 74 74 527 58 21 649 65 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 94 264 51 88 308 74 74 527 58 21 649 65 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.68 0.32 1.00 1.61 0.39 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 2685 515 1600 2583 617 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.06 0.10 0.10 0.06 0.12 0.12 0.05 0.16 0.04 0.01 0.20 0.04 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering 30WPAM Wed Nov 6, 2013 14:07:55 Page 4 -1 TTM72195 TIA Forecast Year 2030 With Project Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection 42 Baldwin Park Blvd /Ramona Blvd Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.600 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 40 Level Of Service: A ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II---------- - - - - - ) Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- fl---------- - - - - - I Volume Module: Base Vol: 59 318 108 110 353 90 92 564 15 139 669 63 Growth Adj: 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 Initial Bse: 68 365 124 126 406 103 106 648 17 160 769 72 Added Vol: 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 68 366 127 126 406 103 106 648 17 161 769 72 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 68 366 127 126 406 103 106 648 17 161 769 72 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 68 366 127 126 406 103 106 648 17 161 769 72 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 68 366 127 126 406 103 106 648 17 161 769 72 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II---------- - - - - -I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.04 0.11 0.08 0.08 0.13 0.06 0.07 0.20 0.01 0.10 0.24 0.05 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering 30WPAM Wed Nov 6, 2013 14:07:55 Page 5 -1 TTM72195 TIA Forecast Year 2030 With Project Conditions AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Baldwin Park Blvd /Merced Ave Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.647 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 44 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II---------- - - - - - I Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ----- --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Volume Module: Base Vol: 74 425 69 163 624 43 51 302 95 147 332 135 Growth Adj: 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1..15 1.15 1.15 Initial Bse: 85 488 79 187 717 49 59 347 1.09 169 381 155 Added Vol: 3 0 0 0 0 1 4 7 9 0 2 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 88 488 79 187 717 50 63 354 118 169 383 155 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Ad!: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 88 488 79 187 717 50 63 354 1.18 169 383 155 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 88 488 79 187 717 50 63 354 118 169 383 155 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 88 488 79 187 717 50 63 354 118 169 383 155 --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.72 0.28 1.00 1.87 0.13 1.00 1.50 0.50 1.00 1.42 0.58 Final Sat.: 1600 2753 447 1600 2990 210 1600 2399 801 1600 2278 922 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II ---------- - - - - - I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.06 0.18 0.18 0.12 0.24 0.24 0.04 0.15 0.15 0.11 0.17 0.17 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering 30WPAM Wed Nov 6, 2013 14:07:55 Page 6 -1 TTM72195 TIA Forecast Year 2030 With Project Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Baldwin Park Blvd /Foster Ave Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.547 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 36 Level. Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L -- T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------- - - - - - I Control: Prot+Permit Prot +Permit Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 --------------------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------- - - - - -I Volume Module: Base Vol: 71 357 9 17 704 60 60 120 142 16 90 15 Growth Adj: 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 Initial Bse: 82 41,0 10 20 809 69 69 138 163 18 103 17 Added Vol: 0 3 0 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 82 413 10 21 817 69 69 138 163 18 103 17 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 82 413 10 21 817 69 69 138 163 18 103 17 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 82 413 1.0 21 817 69 69 138 163 18 103 17 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 82 413 10 21 817 69 69 138 163 18 103 17 ------------ --------------- il--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.33 0.67 1.00 0.15 0.85 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 533 1067 1600 242 1358 1600 ------------ I--------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.05 0.13 0.01 0.01 0.26 0.04 0.04 0.13 0.10 0.01 0.08 0.01 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering 30WPAM Wed Nov 6, 2013 14:07:55 Page 7 -1 TTM72195 TIA Forecast Year 2030 With Project Conditions AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 Vineland Ave /Merced Ave Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.612 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 41 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II----------- - - - -II --- II---------- - - - - -I Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ I ---------------II---------------II---------------II------ Volume Module: Base Vol: 79 113 51 49 152 115 79 277 71 33 412 30 Growth Adj: 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 Initial Bse: 91 130 59 56 175 132 91 318 82 38 473 34 Added Vol: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 0 1 0 PasserByvol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 92 130 59 56 175 132 91 322 85 38 474 34 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 PHF Volume: 92 130 59 56 175 132 91 322 85 38 474 34 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 92 130 59 56 175 132 91 322 85 38 474 34 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 92 130 59 56 175 132 91 322 85 38 474 34 ------------ ---------------II---------------II---------------II------ Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.33 0.46 0.21 0.16 0.48 0.36 0.36 1.30 0.34 0.14 1.73 0.13 Final Sat.: 524 741 335 248 770 582 584 2072 544 222 2776 202 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.06 0.18 0.18 0.04 0.23 0.23 0.06 0.16 0.16 0.02 0.17 0.17 Crit Moves * * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering 30WPPM Wed Nov 6, 2013 14:08:29 Page 3 -1 TTM72195 TIA Forecast Year 2030 With Project Conditions PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Merced Ave /Ramona Blvd Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.591. Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 39 Level Of Service: A ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Control: Protected Protected Prot +Permit Prot +Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- - - - - - - -I Volume Module: Base Vol: 49 250 60 81 292 44 89 818 92 38 387 57 Growth Adj: 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 Initial Bse: 56 287 69 93 335 51 102 940 106 44 445 65 Added Vol: 3 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 59 289 69 93 338 51 102 940 110 44 445 65 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 PHF Volume: 59 289 69 93 338 51 102 940 110 44 445 65 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 59 289 69 93 338 51 102 940 110 44 445 65 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 59 289 69 93 338 51 102 940 110 44 445 65 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.62 0.38 1.00 1.74 0.26 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 2584 616 1600 2784 416 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II-------------- -II - -- I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.04 0.11 0.11 0.06 0.12 0.12 0.06 0.29 0.07 0.03 0.14 0.04 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering 30WPPM Wed Nov 6, 2013 14:08:29 Page 4 -1 TTM72195 TIA Forecast Year 2030 With Project Conditions PM Peak Hour ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Leve1 Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Baldwin Park Blvd /Ramona Blvd Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.738 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 55 Level Of Service: C ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II---------- - - - - - I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - i Volume Module: Base Vol: 77 303 160 141 377 77 111 924 33 121 561 54 Growth Adj: 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 Initial Bse: 88 348 184 162 433 88 128 1062 38 139 645 62 Added Vol: 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 88 349 186 162 434 88 128 1062 38 142 645 62 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 PHF Volume: 88 349 186 162 434 88 128 1062 38 142 645 62 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 88 349 186 162 434 88 128 1062 38 142 645 62 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 88 349 186 162 434 88 128 1062 38 142 645 62 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- 11--------------- 11---------- - - - - -I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.06 0.11 0.12 0.10 0.14 0.06 0.08 0.33 0.02 0.09 0.20 0.04 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering 30WPPM Wed Nov 6, 2013 14:08:29 Page 5 -1 TTM72195 TIA Forecast Year 2030 With Project Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Baldwin Park Blvd /Merced Ave Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.652 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 45 Level Of Service: B ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------------------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II---------- - - - - -I Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I--------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -I Volume Module: Base Vol: 106 485 111 198 422 28 40 343 74 60 315 114 Growth Adj: 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 Initial Bse: 122 557 128 227 485 32 46 394 85 69 362 131 Added Vol: 10 0 0 0 0 4 3 4 6 0 7 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 132 557 128 227 485 36 49 398 91 69 369 131 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1,00 1.,00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 PHF Volume: 132 557 128 227 485 36 49 398 91 69 369 131 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 132 557 128 227 485 36 49 398 91 69 369 131 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 132 557 128 227 485 36 49 398 91 69 369 131 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------- - - - - - I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.63 0.37 1.00 1.86 0.14 1.00 1.63 0.37 1.00 1.48 0.52 Final Sat.: 1600 2604 596 1600 2978 222 1600 2604 596 1600 2362 838 ------------ I--------------- 11--------------- 11--------------- II---------- - - - - -I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.08 0.21 0.21 0.14 0.16 0.16 0.03 0.15 0.15 0.04 0.16 0.16 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering 30WPPM Wed Nov 6, 2013 14:08:29 Page 6 -1 TTM72195 TIA Forecast Year 2030 With Project Conditions PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Baldwin Park Blvd /Foster Ave Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.399 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 29 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I ---------------II--------------- II ---------------II-------- Control: Prot +Permit Prot +Permit Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 --------- - - - I -- ------- II - - - - -- -- II--------------- il---------- - - - - -I Volume Module: Base Vol: 71 547 24 11 504 32 27 43 31 13 51 21 Growth Adj: 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 Initial Bse: 82 628 28 13 579 37 31 49 36 15 59 24 Added Vol: 0 9 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 82 637 28 14 584 37 31 49 36 15 59 25 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 PHF Volume: 82 637 28 14 584 37 31 49 36 15 59 25 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 82 637 28 14 584 37 31 49 36 15 59 25 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 82 637 28 14 584 37 31 49 36 15 59 25 ------------ --------------- il--------------- il--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1.600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.39 0.61 1.00 0.20 0.80 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 617 983 1600 325 1275 1600 ------------ I ---------------II---------------II---------------II-------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.05 0.20 0.02 0.01 0.18 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.05 0.02 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering 30WPPM Wed Nov 6, 2013 14:08:29 Page 7 -1 TTM72195 TIA Forecast Year 2030 With Project Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 Vineland Ave /Merced Ave Cycle (sec): 100 Critical. Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.473 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 32 Level Of Service: A ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L -- T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------- - - - - - I Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Volume Module: Base Vol: 64 105 20 41 83 47 55 315 48 17 405 38 Growth Adj: 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 Initial Bse: 74 121 23 47 95 54 63 362 55 20 465 44 Added Vol: 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 4 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 77 121 23 47 95 54 63 365 57 20 469 44 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 77 121 23 47 95 54 63 365 57 20 469 44 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 77 121 23 47 95 54 63 365 57 20 469 44 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 77 121 23 47 95 54 63 365 57 20 469 44 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.35 0.55 0.10 0.24 0.49 0.27 0.26 1.50 0.24 0.07 1.77 0.16 Final Sat.: 556 877 167 384 777 440 417 2406 377 117 2820 262 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.05 0.14 0.14 0.03 0.12 0.12 0.04 0.15 0.15 0.01 0.17 0.17 Crit Moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJW Engineering APPENDIX H TRANSIT INFORMATION Eastbound (Approximate Timesl 440 + El Monte Station Ramona & Francisquito San Bernardino & i Eastland center ;Stimson&2nd i Vatley&Lemon Temple &Grand i Tempte& Azusa i Pomona 4:148 4:50 A 4:01A 5:1 9 i 8:U4 5:33 U: ILA 5:41 5:08 5:23A 5:42A 5:50A 6:02 5:20 5:49 6:03 5:36 6:05 6:20 6:28 5:40 5:55 6:15 6:24 5:50 — 6:20 6:35 6:01 6:32 6:47 6:55 6:08 6:24 6:44 6:53 — 7:06 6:13 6:44 6:59 6:26 6:57 7:13 7:22 6:28 6:44 7:04 7:16 6:49 7:12 7:28 6:44 7:02 7:23 7:32 7:46 6:55 7:28 7:44 7:53 7:01 7:17 7:38 7:47 — 8:01 7:11 — /:44 7:20 7:36 7:57 8:06 8:20 7:27 8:00 8:16 8:25 7:43 8:16 8:32 7:48 8:04 8:24 8:33 8:47 8:01 8:34 8:50 8:59 8:18 8:34 8:54 9:03 — t 9:15 8:19 8:52 9:08 8:39 9:12 9:28 9:37 8:50 9:06 9:26 9:35 — 9:47 9:05 9:38 9:54 10:03 9:20 9:37 9:57 10:06 10:18 915 10:08 10:25 10:34 9:50 10:07 10:27 10:36 10:48 10:05 — 10:38 10:55 11:04 10:20 10:37 10:57 11:07 11:19 10:35 11:08 11:25 11:34 10:50 11:07 11:27 11:37 11:49 11:05 11:38 11:55 12.04P 11:20 11:37 11:57 12:07P 12:19 11:35 12:09P 12:26P 12:35 11:50 12:07P 12:27P 12:37 — — 12:49 12:05P — — 12:39 12:56 1:05 12:20 12:37 12:57 1:07 1:19 12:35 — — 1:09 1:26 1:35 12:50 1:07 1:29 1:39 — — 1:51 1:05 — 1:39 1:56 2:04 1:20 1:37 1:59 2:09 2:21 1:35 — — 2:10 2:27 2:35 1:50 2:07 2:29 2:39 — — 2:51 2:00 — 2:36 2:53 3:01 2:10 2:28 2:50 3:00 3:12 2:20 — 2:56 3:13 3:21 2:30 2:48 3:10 3:20 — 3:32 2:40 — 3:17 3:34 3:42 2:50 3:08 3:30 3:40 3:00 3:37 3:54 4:02 3:10 3:28 3:50 4:00 — 4:11 3:22 — 3:59 4:16 4:24 3:30 3:48 4:10 4:20 — — 3:43 — 4:21 4:38 3:49 4:08 4:29 4:39 — 4:50 4:05 4:26 4:47 4:57 4:10 4:48 5:05 5:13 4:20 4:41 5:02 5:12 5:23 4:28 5:06 i 5:23 4:35 4:56 5:17 5:27 5:38 4:43 5:21 5:38 5:46 4:50 5:11 5:32 5:42 4:57 5:34 5:51 5:05 5:26 5:47 5:57 6:08 5:09 5:46 6:03 5:21 — — — 5:58 6:13 6:21 5:21 5:42 6:03 6:12 5:33 6:10 6:25 5:38 5:59 6:19 6:28 6:39 5:47 6:23 6:38 6:46 5:59 6:16 6:36 6:45 6:07 6:42 6:57 7:05 6:17 6:34 6:54 7:03 7:14 6:30 — 7:04 7:19 7:27 6:44 7:01 7:20 7:29 — — 7:00 7:32 7:47 7:20 7:37 7:56 8:05 8:15 7:40 8:11 8:25 8:33 8:00 8:14 8:31 8:40 8:50 8:20 8:49 9:03 9:00 9:26 9:39 9:47 9:05 9:18 9:32 9:39 9:47 10:00 — — — 10:22 10:32 10:38 10:00 10:13 10:27 10:34 10:42 11:00 11:22 11:32 11:38 11:00 11:13 11:27 11:34 11:59 12:22A 12:32A 12:38A 11:59 12:13A 12:27A 12:34A 1:05A 1:27 1:37 1:42 6:34 7:01 7:15 7:29 7:55 8:00 8:09 8:29 8:32 8:56 9:06 9:24 9:44 9:56 10:10 10:27 10:41 10:57 11:11 11:28 11:41 11:58 12:11P 12:28 12:42 12:58 1:12 1:28 1:42 2:00 2:11 2:30 2:42 3:00 3:08 3:21 3:28 3:41 3:49 4:09 4:20 4:31 4:59 5:20 5:32 5:47 5:53 6:27 6:47 6:52 7:11 7:21 7:33 8:23 8:39 8:57 9:53 9:54 10:43 10:49 11:43 12:43A 1:46 Westbound (Approximate Times) Temple & Temple & Grand Eastland Center San Bernardino :Ramona & Valley & Lemon Old Valley & El Monte Station Pomona i & Azusa Francisquito Stimson 194 4:11A 4:16A 4:23A 4:37A SASA 190 — 4:40A 4:47A 5:04A 5:20 194 4:42 4:47 4:54 5:09 5:40 190 — 5:07 5:16 5:34 5:50 194 5:10 5:15 — 5:22 5:37 6,06 190 — 5:37 i 5:46 6:04 6:n 194 5:32 5:38 — 5:46 6:01 6:36 190 — 5:50 5:59 6:19 — — 6:37 190 5:47 6:54 6:03 6:12 6:32 6:50 194 5:55 6:02 — 6:10 6:25 7:00 190 — — 6:15 6:24 6:44 7:02 190 6:27 6:36 6:56 — — 7:15 194 — — — 6:25 6:40 7:19 190 6:21 6:30 6:39 6:48 7:08 — 7:27 194 6:24 6:29 6:37 6:52 7:31 190 — 6:48 6:57 7:18 7:37 194 — 6:48 7:04 7:43 19 .9 — �9 u 7:30 1 7:49 194 6:44 6:51 6:59 7:16 7:55 190 7:11 7:21 7:42 — — 8:01 194 — 7:11 7:28 8:07 190 7:24 7:34 7:55 — — 8:14 194 7:10 7:16 7:24 7:41 8:20 199 7:16 7:26 7:37 7:47 8:08 8:27 194 — — — 7:39 7:56 8:35 190 — 7:52 8:03 8:23 8:42 194 7:39 7:45 — 7:55 8:12 8:51 190 7:51 8:01 8:12 8:23 8:43 — — 9.02 194 — — 8:15 8:32 9:11 190 8:12 8:22 8:33 8:44 9:04 9:23 194 8:24 8:32 — 8:42 8:59 9:38 190 8:42 8:52 9:03 9:14 9:34 9:53 194 8:56 9:02 — — 9:12 9:29 10:08 190 9:12 9:22 9:33 9:44 10:04 10:23 194 9:26 9:32 — 9:42 9:59 10:38 190 9:42 9:52 10:03 10:14 10:34 10:53 194 9:55 10:02 — — 10:12 10:29 11:08 190 10:12 10:22 10:33 10:44 11:04 — — 11:23 194 10:25 10:32 — 10:42 10:59 11:38 190 10:42 10:52 11:03 11:14 11:34 11:53 194 10:55 11:02 — 11:12 11:29 12:08P 19fl 11:12 11:22 11:33 11:44 12:04P 12:23 194 11:25 11:32 11:42 11:59 12:38 190 11:42 11:52 12:03P 1214P 12:34 12-53 194 11:55 12:02P — 12:12P 12:29P 1:06 190 12:12P 12:22 12:33 12:44 1:04 1:23 194 12:25 12:32 — 12:42 12:59 1:38 190 1241 12:51 1:02 1:13 1:34 1:53 194 12:55 1:02 — 1:12 1:29 2:08 190 1:10 1:20 1:31 1:42 2:03 2:22 194 1.25 1:32 1:42 1:59 2:39 190 1:38 1:47 1:58 2:09 2:30 2:49 194 1:40 1:47 1:57 2:14 2:54 194 1:65 2:02 2:12 2:29 3:09 190 2:07 2:16 2:28 2:39 3:00 3:19 194 2:15 2:22 2:32 2:49 3:29 190 2:26 2:36 2:48 2:59 3:20 3:39 194 2:37 2:43 2:52 3:09 3:49 190 2:46 2:56 3:08 3:19 3:40 3:59 194 2:55 3:02 — 3:12 3:29 4:09 190 3:07 3:16 3:28 3:39 4:00 4:19 194 3:15 3:22 — 3:32 3:49 4:29 190 3:25 3:35 3:47 3:58 4:20 4:39 194 3:35 3:42 — 3:52 4:09 4:49 194 3:50 3:57 4:07 4:24 5:04 190 3:55 4:05 4:17 4:29 4:51 — — 5:10 194 4:05 4:12 — — — 4:22 4:39 5:19 194 4:20 4:27 4:37 4:54 5:34 190 4:31 4:41 4:53 5:05 5:27 5:46 194 — 4:53 5:10 5:50 194 4:56 5:03 5:13 5:30 6:09 190 5:11 5:21 5:33 5:45 6:06 6:24 194 5:33 5:50 6:28 194 5:37 5:44 — 5:54 6:10 6:48 190 5:51 6:01 6:12 6:23 6:43 7:01 194 5:59 6:06 — 6:16 6:32 7:08 194 6:25 6:31 6:41 6:57 7:30 190 6:46 6:56 7:04 7:13 7:31 7:47 194 7:00 7:07 7:16 7:31 8:04 194 7:47 7:54 8:03 8:16 8:46 190 7:50 7:58 8:06 8:14 8:30 8:44 194 8:58 9:03 9:19 9:20 9:44 190 8:59 9:07 9:15 9:23 9:39 9:53 190 10:65 10:12 10:20 10:27 10:49 10:51 194 10:06 10:11 10:17 19:27 10:51 190 11:64 11:11 11:19 11:26 11:39 11:50 194 11:05 11:10 11:16 11:26 11:50 194 12-05A 12:10A 12:16A 12:26A 12:50A 194 1:07 1:12 1:18 1:28 1:52 Holiday Schedute Horario de dial feriados Sunday & Holiday schedule will operate on Se usara horario del domingo y dias feriados para New Year's New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. Day y Christmas Day. Eastbound (Approximate Times) Westbound (Approximate Times] I 174 CNA — ; — : — ; 9:1 /A 9 D:JZA D:JYA 6:44A I74 t:UM b:]UA — ; — : — : 5:16A 1 b:JIA 6:UUA 190 5:30 5:43A 6:OOA 6:88A : — — 6:18 6:26 190 a 5:54A 6:02A 6:20A 6:35 194 5:45 — : 6:12 6:27 1 6:34 i 6:40 194 5:53 i 5:59 6:07 6:23 i 6:55 190 6:19 6:33 6:50 6:58 7:08 7:16 190 — 6:24 6:32 6:50 7:05 I -7:n-7 1 .7 ':— 6:53 7:26 194 6:25 LIE un .:52 1 .1 1:15 1:21 191+ u LIE JU 0 194 6:55 7:22 7:37 7:45 7:51 190 6:37 6:44 6:53 7:01 7:20 7:35 190 7:12 7:26 7:43 7:51 8:01 8:09 194 — 7:05 7:21 7:54 194 7:20 7:48 8:03 — 190 — 7:31 7:50 8:05 194 7:40 8:08 8:23 8:31 8:37 194 7:09 7:15 7:23 7:39 8:13 194 8:01 8:29 8:44 — 194 — 7:41 7:57 8:32 190 8:11 8:25 8:45 8:54 9:04 932 190 7:40 7:47 7:56 8:05 8:25 8:40 194 8:21 8:49 9:04 9:12 9:18 194 7:45 7:51 7:59 8:15 8:50 194 8:41 9:09 9:24 — 194 — 8:17 8:33 9:09 9:29 9:44 9:52 9:58 190 815 8:22 8:31 8:40 9:00 9:15 194 9:00 : — : — : — 190 9:10 9:25 9:45 9:54 10:05 i 10:13 194 8:23 8:29 8:37 8:53 9:31 194 9:20 9:49 :10:04 — 190 8:49 8:56 9:05 9:14 9:35 9:50 : 194 9:40 10:09 i 10:25 10:33 10:39 194 — 8:57 9:13 9:51 194 9:58 10:30 10:46 — 194 9:03 9:09 9:17 9:33 10:11 190 10:10 10:25 10:45 10:54 11:05 i 11:13 190 — 9:41 9:50 10:11 10:26 194 10:19 10:51 11:07 11:15 11:22 194 — 9:37 9:53 10:31 194 10:40 11:12 11:28 — 194 9:43 9:49 9:57 i 1013 1 10:51 194 11:00 11:32 11:48 # 11:56 12:03P 190 9:56 10:04 1014 10:24 10:45 11:00 190 11:10 11:25 11:45 i 11:54 12:05P 12:13 194 — 1017 10:33 11:11 194 11:20 — 11:52 12:08P — 194 10:23 10:29 10:37 10:53 11:31 194 11:40 12:12P 12:28 12:36 12:43 190 10:36 10:44 10:54 11:04 i 11:25 11:40 194 11:59 12:32 12:48 — 194 — 10:56 11:13 11:51 190 12:10P 12:25P 12:45P 12:54P 105 i 1:13 194 1101 1108 11:16 1133 12:11P 194 12:20 12:52 1:08 1:16 1:23 194 — 11:36 11:53 12:31 194 12:40 1:12 1:28 — 190 11:36 11:44 11:54 i 12:04P 12:25P 12:40 194 1:01 1:33 1:49 1:57 2:04 194 11:41 11:48 11:56 12:13P 12:51 190 1:10 1:25 i 1:45 1:54 2:05 2:13 194 12:16P 12:33 1:11 194 1:23 1:55 211 i 194 12:21P 12:28P 12:36 12:53 r 1:31 194 1:45 2:17 2:33 2:41 2:48 190 12:36 12:44 12:54P i 1:04 1:25 1:40 190 2:05 i 2:20 2:40 2:49 i 3:00 3:08 194 — 12:56 1:13 1:51 194 2:05 2:37 2:53 194 1:01 1:08 1:16 1:33 2:11 194 2:25 2:57 I 3:13 3:21 3:28 194 — 1:36 1:53 i 2:31 194 2:45 3:17 3:33 — 190 1:36 i 1:44 i 1:54 2:04 i 2:25 2:40 190 2:55 3:10 3:30 3:39 3:50 3:58 194 1:43 1159 1:58 2:15 2:53 194 3:05 3:37 3:53 4:01 4:08 194 — 2:20 2:37 3:14 194 3:25 3:57 4:13 — 194 2:25 2:32 2:40 s 2:57 i 3:33 190 3:30 3:45 4:05 4:15 4:26 4:34 190 2:36 2:44 2:54 3:04 3:25 3:40 194 3:45 4:17 4:33 4:41 i 4:46 194 — 3:01 3:17 3:53 190 4:05 4:20 4:40 i 4:50 5:01 i 5:08 194 3:01 3:08 3:16 i 3:32 4:08 194 4:05 4:37 4:53 i 5:01 5:08 194 3:18 3:23 3:31 i 3:47 4:23 194 4:25 4:57 5:13 i 5:21 5:28 194 — 3:45 4:01 i 4:37 190 4:40 4:55 5:15 5:25 — 199 3:36 3:44 3:54 4:04 4:25 4:40 194 4:45 5:17 5:33 — 194 3:48 3:55 4:03 419 4:55 194 5:05 5:37 5:53 i 6:01 i 6:06 194 4:07 4:14 4:22 4:38 5:12 190 5:15 5:30 5:50 6:00 6:11 6:19 194 — 4:42 4:58 5:32 194 5:23 5:55 6:10 — 190 4:36 4:44 4:54 5:04 i 5:25 5:40 194 5:42 6:13 6:28 6:36 6:42 194 4:51 i 4:58 5:06 i 5:21 5:55 190 5:55 6:10 i 6:29 6:38 i 6:49 6:56 194 5:16 5:23 5:31 5:46 i 6:20 194 6:03 6:33 E 6:48 6:55 7:00 190 5:39 5:47 5:57 i 6:06 6:25 6:40 194 6:23 6:53 7:07 715 7:21 194 — ! 618 6:32 7:05 190 6:40 6:55 i 7:13 i 7:22 7:32 7:40 199 6:39 i 6:47 6:57 7:05 7:22 ! — — 7:37 194 7:00 7:29 7:43 7:50 7:55 194 6:56 7:92 710 7:24 7:55 190 7:26 7:40 7:58 8:07 8:17 8:25 190 7:45 7:52 8:01 8:09 8:25 8:38 194 7:45 — : 8:13 8:26 8:33 8:39 194 7:55 8:01 — ; 8:09 8:22 8:52 190 8:11 8:25 8:40 8:49 8:59 9:05 190 8:51 6:58 9:07 9:15 9:31 9:44 194 8:31 8:58 9:08 9:13 9:17 194 8:58 9:03 919 9:20 9:44 190 9:05 i 9:18 9:32 9:39 9:47 i 9:54 190 10:05 10:12 10:20 i 10:27 i 10:40 10:51 194 9:06 9:20 9:38 9:44 9:49 194 10:06 10:11 1017 19:27 10:51 194 10:00 10:22 10:32 110 :38 10:43 190 1105 i 11:12 1 11:29 11:27 11:49 11:51 198 10:00 10:13 10:27 10:34 10:42 10:49 194 1105 11:10 i i 11:16 11:26 11:50 194 11:00 11:22 11:32 i 11:38 11:43 194 12:05A i 12:19A i i 12:16A 12:26A 12:50A 190 11:00 i 11:13 11:27 11:34 — 194 1:07 1:12 1:18 1:28 1:52 194 11:59 12:22A 12:32A 12:38A 12:43A 190 11:59 i 12:13A 12:27A 12:34A 194 1:05A 1:27 1:37 1:42 1:46 •cr M ci Oa cc cr An 0 E CD E, en C2- 43 ca L.1 M J M C 65 a .0 u a = E y Z! 0 M X = : - tit = : U O : E t = CL E 0 2 CL W C E = 0 : M : cc : cc : -= E E E M M M Mu : C= cn LAJ to LU cn CD 174 CNA — ; — : — ; 9:1 /A 9 D:JZA D:JYA 6:44A I74 t:UM b:]UA — ; — : — : 5:16A 1 b:JIA 6:UUA 190 5:30 5:43A 6:OOA 6:88A : — — 6:18 6:26 190 a 5:54A 6:02A 6:20A 6:35 194 5:45 — : 6:12 6:27 1 6:34 i 6:40 194 5:53 i 5:59 6:07 6:23 i 6:55 190 6:19 6:33 6:50 6:58 7:08 7:16 190 — 6:24 6:32 6:50 7:05 I -7:n-7 1 .7 ':— 6:53 7:26 194 6:25 LIE un .:52 1 .1 1:15 1:21 191+ u LIE JU 0 194 6:55 7:22 7:37 7:45 7:51 190 6:37 6:44 6:53 7:01 7:20 7:35 190 7:12 7:26 7:43 7:51 8:01 8:09 194 — 7:05 7:21 7:54 194 7:20 7:48 8:03 — 190 — 7:31 7:50 8:05 194 7:40 8:08 8:23 8:31 8:37 194 7:09 7:15 7:23 7:39 8:13 194 8:01 8:29 8:44 — 194 — 7:41 7:57 8:32 190 8:11 8:25 8:45 8:54 9:04 932 190 7:40 7:47 7:56 8:05 8:25 8:40 194 8:21 8:49 9:04 9:12 9:18 194 7:45 7:51 7:59 8:15 8:50 194 8:41 9:09 9:24 — 194 — 8:17 8:33 9:09 9:29 9:44 9:52 9:58 190 815 8:22 8:31 8:40 9:00 9:15 194 9:00 : — : — : — 190 9:10 9:25 9:45 9:54 10:05 i 10:13 194 8:23 8:29 8:37 8:53 9:31 194 9:20 9:49 :10:04 — 190 8:49 8:56 9:05 9:14 9:35 9:50 : 194 9:40 10:09 i 10:25 10:33 10:39 194 — 8:57 9:13 9:51 194 9:58 10:30 10:46 — 194 9:03 9:09 9:17 9:33 10:11 190 10:10 10:25 10:45 10:54 11:05 i 11:13 190 — 9:41 9:50 10:11 10:26 194 10:19 10:51 11:07 11:15 11:22 194 — 9:37 9:53 10:31 194 10:40 11:12 11:28 — 194 9:43 9:49 9:57 i 1013 1 10:51 194 11:00 11:32 11:48 # 11:56 12:03P 190 9:56 10:04 1014 10:24 10:45 11:00 190 11:10 11:25 11:45 i 11:54 12:05P 12:13 194 — 1017 10:33 11:11 194 11:20 — 11:52 12:08P — 194 10:23 10:29 10:37 10:53 11:31 194 11:40 12:12P 12:28 12:36 12:43 190 10:36 10:44 10:54 11:04 i 11:25 11:40 194 11:59 12:32 12:48 — 194 — 10:56 11:13 11:51 190 12:10P 12:25P 12:45P 12:54P 105 i 1:13 194 1101 1108 11:16 1133 12:11P 194 12:20 12:52 1:08 1:16 1:23 194 — 11:36 11:53 12:31 194 12:40 1:12 1:28 — 190 11:36 11:44 11:54 i 12:04P 12:25P 12:40 194 1:01 1:33 1:49 1:57 2:04 194 11:41 11:48 11:56 12:13P 12:51 190 1:10 1:25 i 1:45 1:54 2:05 2:13 194 12:16P 12:33 1:11 194 1:23 1:55 211 i 194 12:21P 12:28P 12:36 12:53 r 1:31 194 1:45 2:17 2:33 2:41 2:48 190 12:36 12:44 12:54P i 1:04 1:25 1:40 190 2:05 i 2:20 2:40 2:49 i 3:00 3:08 194 — 12:56 1:13 1:51 194 2:05 2:37 2:53 194 1:01 1:08 1:16 1:33 2:11 194 2:25 2:57 I 3:13 3:21 3:28 194 — 1:36 1:53 i 2:31 194 2:45 3:17 3:33 — 190 1:36 i 1:44 i 1:54 2:04 i 2:25 2:40 190 2:55 3:10 3:30 3:39 3:50 3:58 194 1:43 1159 1:58 2:15 2:53 194 3:05 3:37 3:53 4:01 4:08 194 — 2:20 2:37 3:14 194 3:25 3:57 4:13 — 194 2:25 2:32 2:40 s 2:57 i 3:33 190 3:30 3:45 4:05 4:15 4:26 4:34 190 2:36 2:44 2:54 3:04 3:25 3:40 194 3:45 4:17 4:33 4:41 i 4:46 194 — 3:01 3:17 3:53 190 4:05 4:20 4:40 i 4:50 5:01 i 5:08 194 3:01 3:08 3:16 i 3:32 4:08 194 4:05 4:37 4:53 i 5:01 5:08 194 3:18 3:23 3:31 i 3:47 4:23 194 4:25 4:57 5:13 i 5:21 5:28 194 — 3:45 4:01 i 4:37 190 4:40 4:55 5:15 5:25 — 199 3:36 3:44 3:54 4:04 4:25 4:40 194 4:45 5:17 5:33 — 194 3:48 3:55 4:03 419 4:55 194 5:05 5:37 5:53 i 6:01 i 6:06 194 4:07 4:14 4:22 4:38 5:12 190 5:15 5:30 5:50 6:00 6:11 6:19 194 — 4:42 4:58 5:32 194 5:23 5:55 6:10 — 190 4:36 4:44 4:54 5:04 i 5:25 5:40 194 5:42 6:13 6:28 6:36 6:42 194 4:51 i 4:58 5:06 i 5:21 5:55 190 5:55 6:10 i 6:29 6:38 i 6:49 6:56 194 5:16 5:23 5:31 5:46 i 6:20 194 6:03 6:33 E 6:48 6:55 7:00 190 5:39 5:47 5:57 i 6:06 6:25 6:40 194 6:23 6:53 7:07 715 7:21 194 — ! 618 6:32 7:05 190 6:40 6:55 i 7:13 i 7:22 7:32 7:40 199 6:39 i 6:47 6:57 7:05 7:22 ! — — 7:37 194 7:00 7:29 7:43 7:50 7:55 194 6:56 7:92 710 7:24 7:55 190 7:26 7:40 7:58 8:07 8:17 8:25 190 7:45 7:52 8:01 8:09 8:25 8:38 194 7:45 — : 8:13 8:26 8:33 8:39 194 7:55 8:01 — ; 8:09 8:22 8:52 190 8:11 8:25 8:40 8:49 8:59 9:05 190 8:51 6:58 9:07 9:15 9:31 9:44 194 8:31 8:58 9:08 9:13 9:17 194 8:58 9:03 919 9:20 9:44 190 9:05 i 9:18 9:32 9:39 9:47 i 9:54 190 10:05 10:12 10:20 i 10:27 i 10:40 10:51 194 9:06 9:20 9:38 9:44 9:49 194 10:06 10:11 1017 19:27 10:51 194 10:00 10:22 10:32 110 :38 10:43 190 1105 i 11:12 1 11:29 11:27 11:49 11:51 198 10:00 10:13 10:27 10:34 10:42 10:49 194 1105 11:10 i i 11:16 11:26 11:50 194 11:00 11:22 11:32 i 11:38 11:43 194 12:05A i 12:19A i i 12:16A 12:26A 12:50A 190 11:00 i 11:13 11:27 11:34 — 194 1:07 1:12 1:18 1:28 1:52 194 11:59 12:22A 12:32A 12:38A 12:43A 190 11:59 i 12:13A 12:27A 12:34A 194 1:05A 1:27 1:37 1:42 1:46 Wound (Approximate Times) Eastbound (Approximate Times) es MW cc 5 d •C N O ` •C c0 n O cn {� m N a °c' W on `B w CM M ca J Oa Oa {. /. di C di J J fit E C 6Si C O ?� v Cdr tL1 C ,�,� O c o. O O m fA L O. ® 4 {y OG O y �, O E c in 42 .@ E E >= E y c E a w � cn w CA 9 ta'' � r o°—' w in M > o w 194 37A — — — 0 00A a 12A 619A ; b:24A 194 — — — — — a 44A ; 4 57A 5:22A 190 6:15 6:28A ; 6 :45A 6:52A 7:02 `" 7:10 ` 194 5 :16A ' 5:21A — — 5.28 ` 5.41 6 :67 194 6:40 — - - 7:04 7:17 7:24 7:30 190 6:09A i 6:17A 6:32A ; - — 6:47 194 7:05' — — 7:30 7:43 7:50 7:56 194 6:22 6:27 — — — 6:35 6 :49 7:17 190 7:25 7:38 7:55 8:02 8:12 8:20 190 6:53 7:00 7:08 7:16 7:32 7:47 194 7:45 8:10 8:23 8:30 8:36 194 7:18 7:24 — 7:31 7:46 8:16 194 8:05 — — - 8:30 8:43 8:50 8:56 190 7:44 7:50 7:58 8:06 8:23 - — 8:38 190 8:25 8 :38 8.55 9:03 — 913 9:21 194 8:00 8:06 — — 814 1 8.29 9:00 194 8:46 — - — 9 :11 9.25 9:32 9:38 194 8 :19 8:25 — — — 8 :33 8.48 9:20 194 9:05 — 9:31 9:45 9:52 9:58 190 8:44 8 :51 8 :59 9:08 9:25 — — 9:40 190 9:25 9:39 9:56 10:05 - - 10:16 10:24 194 8:58 9:05 — — — 9 :13 9:28 10:00 194 9 :45 - 10:12 10:26 E 10:33 10:39 194 9:18 9:25 — — 9 :33 9:48 10:20 194 10:05 — — — 10:32 10:46 10:53 10 :59 190 9 :43 9:50 9:58 10 :07 10:25 — — 10:40 190 10:25 10 :41 11:00 i 11:09 — — 11:20 11:28 194 9:58 10:05 — — — 10:13 10:28 i 11:00 194 10:45 i — — — 11:13 11:27 11:34 i 11 :40 194 10 :18 10:25 - — — 10:33 10:48 11:20 194 11:05 — 11 :34 11:48 11:55 12:01P 190 10:41 10:48 10 :57 11 :07 i 11 :25 ; 11 :40 190 11:25 11:41 11:59 12:09P ; 12:20P ; 12:28 194 10;57 11:04 — : 11:12 11:27 11:59 194 11:45 — 12:14P 12:28P 12:35 12:41 194 11:17 11:24 — — — 11:32 11:47 12:20P 194 12:05P - — — i 12 :34 12:48 12:55 1:01 190 11:40 11 :48 11:57 12:97P ; 12:25P — — 12:40 190 12:25 12 :41P ;' 1:00P 1:09 1:20 1:28 194 11:57 12 :04P — 12 :12P 12:27P 1:00 194 12:45 1:14 1:29 1:37 1:43 194 12:17P 12:24 — — — 12:32 12:47 1:20 194 1:05 — 1:34 1:49 1:57 2:03 190 12:40 12:48 12:57P 1:07 1:25 — 1 :40 190 1:25 1:41 2:00 2:09 — — 2:20 2:28 194 12:57 1:04 — — — 1:12 1:27 2:00 194 1 :45 — — 2:14 2:29 2:37 2 :43 194 1:17 1:24 — — 1:32 1 :47 2 :20 194 2 :05 — — — 2:34 2:48 2:56 3:02 190 1:40 1:48 1:57 2:07 2:25 — — 2:40 190 2 :25 2:41 3:00 3:09 — — 3 :20 3:28 ` 194 1:57 2 :04 - — 2:12 2 :27 3:00 194 2 :45 — — 3:14 3:28 3:36 3:42 194 2:17 2:24 — — — 2 :32 2:47 3:20 194 315 — 3 :34 3:48- 3:56 4:02 190 2:40 2 :48 2:57 3 :07 3:25 — 3 :40 190 3:25 3:41 4:00 4:09 — — 4:20 4:28 194 2 :57 3:04 — — 3:12 3:27 4:00 194 3:45 — — 4:14 4:28 4:36 4:42 194 3:17 3:24 — 3'32 3:47 4:20 194 4:05 — — — 4:34 4:46 4:56 5:02 190 3:40 3:48 3:57 4:07 4:25 — — 4:40 190 4:25 4 :41 5:00 5:09 — — 5:20 5:28 194 3:57 1 4:04 4:12 4:27 5 :00 194 4:45 — — — 5:14 5:28 5:36 5:42 194 4:17 1 4:24 — — — 4:32 4:47 5:20 190 5:05 5:21 5 :40 5:49 — 6:00 6:08 190 4:40 4:48 4 :57 5:07 5:25 — — 5 :40 194 5:25 — — — 5:54 6:08 6:15 6:21 194 4:57 5:04 — - — 5:12 5:27 6:00 190 5.45 6:01 6:19 6:27 6:37 6:43 194 5:19 5126 — — 5:34 5:49 6:20 194 6:06 — — — 6:33 6:46 6 :53 6:59 190 5:42 5:50 5:59 6:08 6 :25 — — 6:40 190 6 :28 6:43 7:01 7:09 — — 7:19 7:27 194 6:03 6:09 — 6:16 6:30 7 :00 194 6:50 — 7:17 7:30 7:37 7:43 194 6:26 6:32 — — — 6 :39 6 :53 7:20 190 7 :20 7:34 7:51 7:59 — 8 :07 8:14 190 6:45 6:52` 7:00 7 :08 7:25 — — 7:40 194 7 :54 8:19 8:31 8:38 8:43 194 7:09 7:15 - — 7:22 7:35 8:02 190 8:20 8:33 8:47 8:54 — 9:02 9:08 190 7:47 7 :54 8:02 8 :10 8:25 — — 8:38 194 9:00 — — — 9 :22 9:32 9:38 9:43 194 8:02 8 :08 — — — 8:15 8:27 8:53 190 9 :05 9:18 9:32 9:39 9:47 9:54 190 8:51 8:58 9:06 9:13 9:26 — 9:37 194 10:00 — — — ' 10:22 10:32 10:38 10:43 194 8:58 9:03 — — — 9:10 9 :20 9:44 190 10:00 10:13 10:27 10 :34 — 10:42 i 10:49 190 10:05 10:12 10:20 10:27 10:40 i — i 10:51 194 11:00 — — — 11:22 11 :32 11:38 11 :43 194 10:06 10:11 i — - — 10:17 10:27 10:51 190 11:00 11:13 11 :27 11:34 — — — — 190 11:04 11 :11 `i 11:19 11:26 11:39' — 11:50 194 11:59 — — 12:22A ' 12:32A i 12:38A ; 12:43A 194 11 :05 11:10 — — 11:16 11:26 11:50 190 11:59 12:13A i 12:27A 12:34A — — 194 12:05A 12:10A 12:16A i 12:26A ; 12 :50A 194 1:05A 1:27 1:37 1:42 1:46 194 1:07 1 :12 - — — 1:18 1:28 1:52 18 �JLd UIMPILRO 0 ��-j wo MR -0, I M, I LJOSUJ .14S 0 C: C- — 0 o F- CD "I 0- (D (D C: CL 0 a 0 0 L LL Cb LL m 0 0 2: 0 LIJ CN 0- r. LO LL (3) C: 00 00 cn cu W _0 Ln r C-4 00 C 00 -1 L-- 4) U- CN I-T LL tn (D6 c - 04 Ci5 C co C-- in a " m 00 (D --0 "I CV 0 L- LL C c U- LL - m 0 CD f0 U1 - = M 4) co CL 00 0 (1) r O"0 (D 04 a) 0 C: 00 N 0 E 0 I-T C.- r- LLL .V 00 L LL (n 0 L- L-- (D L Zo m m CN m th L- L- a) 0, <u a) 0- 00 0. C) ® 'o C'4 L U- m tn m :z �; 0 C.5 4 I . 'n a) " C, u X ui U- Do m 2 2 LU 37 — IZI 2 u- Li- in 12 cl 12 la m 13 m 0 C: C- — 0 o F- CD "I 0- (D (D C: CL 0 a 0 0 L LL Cb LL 6/11/13 Foothill Transit Bus Schedule 178 WeePdalyEastbu,"mld We-11-1-ffuffEas-lbound jjj? MOM Ptak KIM" Hi9f4 srhqc� J."and Al In f Et �a VI I El Pftai* V f 1 !D Tile Pim at cvpel� Wp 4, roc R'W" --U N-V. "A swm 'f* wnt Kc, "fm 0"w'levrt; IL Troosh covilla fF Ms' Valinda Lille Unea 178 weekdav - Enore semana east hound to El Monte - - En Dig colon Deste Haclo El Monte Leave Puente Hffis t0all ,Arrive EWonta 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Puente Colima & La Puente & Azusa & West Covina Pkwy & Baldwin Park Los Angeles & Cogswell & El Monte Hills Mail Nogales Nogales Amar California Ave Metrolink Merced Ramona Station 5:00 5:13 5:18 5:29 5:43 ..... 5:58 6:08 6:20 5:30 5:43 5:48 5:59 6:13 6:23 6:29 6:40 6:55 6:00 6:13 6:18 6:29 6:45 6:58 7:05 7:16 7:31 6:30 6:44 6:52 7:05 7:21 7:34 7:41 7:52 8:07 7:00 7:14 7:22 7:35 7:51 8:04 8:11 8:22 8:37 7:30 7:44 7:52 8:05 8:21 ..... 8:40 8:51 9:06 8:00 8:14 8:22 8:35 8:51 9:04 9:11 9:22 9:37 vmwfoothiIItransit .org /BusSchedule.aspx?busnumber =178 1/4 6/11/13 Foothill Transit Bus Schedule 178 8:30 8:44 8:52 9:05 9:21 .... 9:40 9:51 10:06 9:00 9:14 9:22 9:35 9:51 10:04 10:11 10:22 10:37 9:30 9:44 9:52 10:05 10:21 ..... 10:40 10:51 11:06 10:00 10:14 10:22 10:35 10:51 ..... 11:10 11:21 11:36 10:30 10:44 10:52 11:05 11:21 11:34 11:41 11:52 12:07 11:00 11:14 11:22 11:35 11:51 ..... 12:10 12:21 12:36 11:3 0 11:44 11:5 2 12:05 12:21 12:34 12:41 12:52 1: 08 12:00 12:14 12:22 12:35 12:51 1:05 1:13 1:27 1:45 12:30 12:44 12:52 1:05 1:23 1-38 1:46 2:00 2:18 1:00 1:15 1:24 1:38 1-56 ..... 2:18 2:32 2:50 1,30 1:45 1.54 2:08 2:26 2:41 2,49 3:03 3:21 2.00 2:15 2-24 2:38 2:56 9:26 3:18 3:32 3:50 2:30 2:45 2:54 3:08 3:26 3:41 3:49 4:03 4:21 3:00 3:15 3:24 3:38 3:56 4:11 4:19 4:33 4:51 3:30 3:45 3:54 4:08 4:26 4:41 4.49 5:03 5:21 4,00 4:15 4:24 4:38 4:56 5:11 5:19 5:33 5:51 4:30 4:45 4:54 5:08 5:26 5:41 5:49 6:03 6:21 5:00 5:15 5:24 5:38 5:56 6:ii 6:19 6:33 6:51 5:30 5:45 5:54 6:08 6:26 6:41 6:49 7:02 7:16 6:00 6:15 6:24 6:38 6:56 7:10 7:16 7.25 7:39 6:30 6:45 6:54 7:07 7:21 ..... 7:39 7:48 8:02 7:00 7:13 7,20 7:33 7.47 ..... 8:05 8:14 8-28 7:30 7:43 7:50 8:03 8:17 ..... 8:35 8:44 8:58 8:00 8:13 8:20 8:33 8:47 .... 9-04 9:13 9:25 8:30 8:43 8:50 9:03 9:16 ... 9:31 9:40 9:52 Une -Uneall`8 weekd,'aV - Entreseinana LIGHT TY PE=AM BOLD TYPE=PM U East."hound to i'lueme -win"s WIN, - En 111recclon Este Hada Puente Hills it Leave El Morrie Arrive, Fluerite Hifls NA, iii 0 0 0 0 0 0 El Monte Cogswell& Los Angeles & Baldwin Park West Covina Pkwy & Azusa & La Puente & Colima & Puente Station Ramona Merced Metrolink California Ave Amar Nogales Nogales Hills Mail 5:00 5:10 5:19 ..... 5:35 5:49 6:00 6:05 6:18 5:29 5:39 5:48 ..... 6:04 6:18 6:29 6:34 6:47 5:58 6:08 6:17 6:24 6:34 6:48 6:59 7:04 7:17 6:27 6:37 6:46 6:53 7:03 7:17 7:28 7:33 7:47 6:52 7:02 7:11 7:18 7:28 7:42 7:55 8:03 8:18 7:17 7:27 7:36 7:43 7:56 8:12 8:25 8:33 8:48 7:42 7:55 8:04 8:12 8:25 8:41 8:54 9:02 9:17 8:14 8:27 8:36 8:44 8:57 9:13 9:26 9:34 9:49 8:44 8:57 9:06 9:14 9:27 9:43 9:56 10:04 10:19 9:14 9:27 9:36 ..... 9:56 10:12 10:25 10:33 10:48 9:44 9:57 10:06 10:14 10:27 10:43 10:56 11:04 11:19 10:14 10:27 10:36 ..... 10:56 11:12 11:25 11:33 11:48 10:44 10:57 11:06 ..... 11:26 11:42 11:55 12:03 12:18 11:14 11:27 11:36 11:44 11:57 12-13 12:26 12:34 12:49 11:44 11:5 7 12:06 ..... 12:26 12:42 12:55 1:03 1:18 12:14 12:27 12:36 12:44 12-S7 1:13 1:26 1:34 1:49 12:43 12:56 1:05 ..... 1:25 1:41 1:54 2.02 2:18 1:09 1:22 1:31 1:39 1-52 2:09 2:24 2:33 2:49 1:34 1:47 1:56 ..... 2:19 2:37 2:52 3:01 3:17 1:59 2:14 2:25 2:34 2:50 3:08 3:23 3:32 3:48 2:29 2:44 2:55 3:04 3:20 3:38 3:53 4:02 4:18 2:59 3:14 3:25 3:34 3:50 4:08 4:23 4.32 4:48 vmm. foothiIltransit .org /BusSchedule.aspx?busnumber =178 2/4 6/11/13 3:29 3:44 3:55 3:59 4:14 4:25 4:29 4:44 4:55 4:59 5:14 5:25 5:30 5:45 5:56 6-05 6:20 6:31 6:40 6:55 7:04 7:15 7:28 7:36 7:50 8:03 8.11 8:25 8:38 8:46 Foothill Transit Bus Schedule 178 4:04 4:20 4.34 4:50 5:04 5,20 5:34 5:50 6:05 6:21 6:40 6-56 7:13 7:26 6:32 7:57 ..... 8:32 7:03 9:06 1121 a - 0*178 Weekend/Hol-lidav - Fin de Semana v Dia de Fiesta 4:38 4:53 5.02 5:18 5:08 5:23 5:32 5:48 5:38 5:53 6:02 6:18 6:08 6:23 6:32 6:48 6:39 6:54 7:03 7:17 7:12 7:24 7:32 7:46 7:41 7:53 8:01 8:15 8:12 8:24 8:32 8:46 8:47 8:59 9:04 9:17 9:19 9:30 9:35 9:48 LIGHT TYPE=AM BOLD TYPE=PM V, estbound to El Monte - En Direcclon Geste Hada El Monte LIGHT TYPE=AM BOLD TYPE=PM back" IhO toq�-� El Monte Cogswell& Los Angeles & Baldwin Park West Covina Pkwy & Azusa & La Puente & Colima & Puente vwm.foothilltransit.orgIBusSchedule.aspx?busnumber= 178 3/4 Lcave Puente HiHs Mall Affive, El Monte 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Puente Colima & La Puente & Azusa & West Covina Pkwy & Baldwin Park Los Angeles & Cogswell& El Monte Hills Mall Nogales Nogales Amar California Ave Metrolink Merced Ramona Station 6:10 6:22 6:28 6:39 6:53 7:08 7:17 7:28 7:10 7:22 7:28 7:39 7:53 8:08 8:17 8:28 8:10 8:22 8:28 8:39 8:53 9:03 9:09 9:18 9:29 8:40 8:52 8:58 9:09 9:23 ..... 9:38 9:47 9:58 9:10 9:22 9:28 9:39 9:53 ..... 10:08 10:17 10:28 9:40 9:52 9:58 10:09 10:23 10:33 10:39 10:48 10:59 10:10 10:2 2 10:28 10:39 10:53 ..... 11:08 11:17 11:28 10:40 10:52 10:58 11:09 11:23 11:38 11:47 11:58 11:10 11:22 11:28 11:39 11:53 12:03 12:09 12:18 12 :29 11:40 11:5 2 11:58 12:09 12:23 ..... 12:38 12:47 12:58 12:10 12:22 12,28 12:39 12:53 ..... 1:08 1:17 1:28 12:40 12:52 12,58 1:09 1:23 1:33 1:39 1:48 1.59 1:10 1:22 1:28 1:39 1:53 ..... 2:08 2:17 2:28 1:40 1:52 1:58 2:09 2:23 ..... 2-38 2:47 2:58 2:10 2:22 2:28 2:39 2:53 ..... 3:08 3:17 3:28 2:40 2:52 2:58 3:09 3:23 3:38 3:47 3:58 3:10 3:22 3:28 3,39 3:53 4:03 4:09 4:18 4:29 3:40 3:52 3:58 4:09 4:23 ..... 4:38 4:47 4:58 4:10 4:22 4:28 4:39 4:53 ..... 5:08 5:17 5:28 4.40 4:52 4:58 5:09 5,23 5:33 5:39 5:48 5:59 5:10 5:22 5:28 5:39 5,53 ..... 6:08 6:17 6:28 6:10 6:22 6:28 6:39 6:53 7:03 7.09 7:18 7:29 7:10 7:22 7:28 7:39 7:53 ..... 8:08 8:17 8:28 LIGHT TYPE=AM BOLD TYPE=PM back" IhO toq�-� El Monte Cogswell& Los Angeles & Baldwin Park West Covina Pkwy & Azusa & La Puente & Colima & Puente vwm.foothilltransit.orgIBusSchedule.aspx?busnumber= 178 3/4 6/11/13 Foothill Transit Bus Schedule 178 Station Ramona Merced Metrolink California Ave Amar Nogales Nogales Hills Mall 6:05 6:15 6:23 ..... 6:41 6:55 7:06 7:12 7:26 7:05 7:15 7:23 ..... 7:41 7:55 8:06 8:12 8:26 8:05 8:15 8:23 ..... 8:41 8:55 9:06 9:12 9:26 8:35 8:45 8:53 8:59 9:09 9:23 9:34 9:40 9:54 9:05 9:15 9:23 ..... 9:41 9:55 10:06 10:12 10:26 9:35 9:45 9:53 ..... 10:11 10:25 10:36 10:42 10:56 10:05 10:15 10:23 10:29 10:39 10:53 11:04 11 :10 11:24 10:35 10:45 10:53 11:11 11:25 11:36 11:42 11:56 11:05 11:15 11:23 ..... 11:41 11:55 12:06 12:12 12:26 11:3 5 11:4 5 11:5 3 11.:5 9 12:09 12:23 12:34 12:40 12:54 12:05 12:15 12:23 ..... 12:41 12:55 1:06 1:12 1:26 12:35 12:45 12:53 ..... 1:11 1:25 1:36 1:42 1:56 1:05 1:15 1:23 -- 1:41 1:55 2:06 2:12 2:26 1:35 1:45 1:53 1:59 2:09 2:23 2:34 2:40 2:54 2:05 2:15 2:23 ..... 2:41 2:55 3:06 3:12 3:26 2:35 2:45 2:53 ..... 3:11 3:25 3:36 3:42 3:56 3:05 3:15 3:23 ..... 3:41 3:55 4:06 4:12 4:26 3:35 3:45 3:53 3:59 4:09 4:23 4:34 4:40 4:54 4:05 4:15 4:23 ..... 4:41 4:55 5:06 5:12 5:26 4:35 4:45 4:53 5:11 5:25 5:36 5:42 5:56 5:05 5:15 5:23 5:29 5:39 5:53 6:04 6:10 6:24 6:05 6:15 6:23 ..... 6:41 6:55 7:06 7:12 7:26 7:05 7:15 7:23 7:29 7:39 7:53 8:04 8:10 8:24 LIGHT TYPE =AM BOLD TYPE =PM Epa —k %F, 11-o wum.foothi Iltransit.org /BusSchedule.aspC?busnumber =178 4/4 1.17111M Foothill Transit Bus Schedule 272 von. foothiIItransit .org /BusSchedule.aspC?busnumber =272 1/4 6/11/13 2"22 Une-Unem Z Foothill Transit Bus Schedule 272 tj Elalftfil Park Weekdav - Entre Semano Covina West court" The Plaza at Transit West Wna SIPre Northbound to Duarte - En 0,11'recclon Nortin Rains Duarle LIGHT TYPE=AM BOLD TYPE=PM ba,ck to mp nImn Southhound to West Covina - Une - UneaL 1A Weekday - Entre Semana En 111recclonSSur Rode West Govina Leave Duarte Leavc,Wost Covina 0 0 0 10 Arrive Duarte 0 0 0 5:40 6:00 6:08 0 West Covina Pkwy & California Merced & Puente Baldwin Park Metrolink Baldwin Park & Olive City of Hope Huntington & Highland 5:34 5:43 5:51 5:55 6:16 6:19 6:04 6:13 6:21 6:29 6:46 6:49 6:39 6:48 6:56 7:04 7:21 7:24 7:24 7:33 7:41 7:50 8:07 8:12 7:54 8:0 3 8:11 8:19 8:36 8:39 8:54 9:03 9:11 9:15 9:36 9:39 9:54 10:03 10:11 10:15 10:36 10:39 10:54 11:03 11:11 11:15 11:36 11:39 11:54 12:03 12:11 12:15 12:36 12:39 12:54 1:03 1:11 1:15 1:36 1:39 1:51 2:00 2:08 2:12 2:33 2:36 2:49 2:58 3:06 3:10 3:31 3:34 3:44 3:53 4:01 4:05 4:26 4:29 4:54 5:03 5:11 5:19 5:36 5:39 5:32 5:41 5:49 5:57 6:14 6:17 6,12 6:21 6:29 6:37 6:54 6-57 6:52 7:01 7:09 7:13 7:34 7:37 LIGHT TYPE=AM BOLD TYPE=PM ba,ck to mp nImn Southhound to West Covina - Une - UneaL 1A Weekday - Entre Semana En 111recclonSSur Rode West Govina 2/4 Leave Duarte Army West Covina 0 0 0 10 Huntington & Highland Baldwin Park & Olive Baldwin Park Metrolink Merced & Puente West Covina Pkwy. & California 5:40 6:00 6:08 6:16 6:26 6:25 6:45 6:53 7:01 7:11 v,mw.foothilltransit.org/BusSchedule.aspx?busnumber=272 2/4 6/11/13 1. eekend/E1,011dall- Fin Lit Se ana v Cis de Fiesta Foothill Transit Bus Schedule 272 N orthhound, to U Uarte - En Direccion Norte Hada Duarte 6:55 7:15 7:23 7:31 7:41 7:30 7:50 7:58 8:06 8:16 8:00 8:20 8:28 8:36 8:46 8:45 9:05 9:13 9:21 9:31 9:45 10:05 10:13 10:21 10:31 10:45 11 :0 5 11:13 11:21 11:31 11:5 0 12:10 12:18 12:26 12:36 12:45 1.05 1:13 1:21 1:31 1:45 2:05 2:13 2:21 2:31 2:45 3:05 3:13 3:21 3:31 3:45 4:05 4:13 4:21 4:31 4:35 4:55 5:03 5:11 5:21 5:10 5:30 5:40 5:48 6:01 5:55 6:15 6:23 6:31 6:41 7:00 7:20 7:28 7:36 7:46 LIGHT TYPE=AM BOLD TYPE=PM b_L­Gk to top Lhin Ainea nallin 1. eekend/E1,011dall- Fin Lit Se ana v Cis de Fiesta N orthhound, to U Uarte - En Direccion Norte Hada Duarte - Fin de Samoan v Pro de Fiesta Leave 1,N est Covina Ardve Duarte, 0 0 0 0 0 0 West Covina & California Merced & Puente Baldwin Park Metrolink Baldwin Park & Olive City of Hope Center Huntington & Highland 7:15 7:24 7:32 7:40 7:54 7:56 8:20 8:29 8:37 8:45 8:59 9:01 9:20 9:29 9:37 9:45 9:59 10:01 10:20 10:29 10:37 10:45 10:59 11:01 11:20 11:29 11:37 11:45 11:59 12:01 12:20 12:29 12:37 12:45 12:59 1:01 1:25 1:34 1:42 1:50 2:04 2:06 2:25 2:34 2:42 2:50 3:04 3:06 3:30 3:39 3:47 3:55 4.09 4:11 4.30 4:39 4:47 4:55 5:09 5:11 5.30 5.39 5:47 5:55 6:09 6:11 6:30 6:39 6-47 6:55 7:09 7:11 7:30 7:39 7:47 7:55 8:09 8:11 LIGHT TY PE=AM BOLD TYPE=PM b a, C- k to t o nNin 11ne, Linea Z U Weekend/Holiday - Southhound to West Covina - - Fin de Samoan v Pro de Fiesta En Ifirecclon Sur Main West Covina Arrive West Covina 0 0 0 Huntington & Highland Baldwin Park & Olive Baldwin Park Metrolink Merced & Puente West Covina & California 6:55 7:14 7:23 7:32 7:40 7:55 8:14 8:23 8:32 8:40 8:55 9:14 9:23 9:32 9:40 9:55 10:14 10:23 10:32 10:40 10:55 11:14 11:23 11:32 11:40 11:5 5 12:14 12:23 12:32 12:40 vmvfoothilltransit .org /BusSchedule.asp)Obusnumber =272 3/4 6/11/13 Foothill Transit Bus Schedule 272 12:55 1:14 1:23 1:32 1:40 1:55 2:14 2:23 2:32 2:40 2:55 3:14 3:23 3:32 3:40 3:55 4:14 4:23 4:32 4:40 4:55 5:14 5:23 5:32 5:40 5:55 6:14 6:23 6:32 6:40 7:00 7:19 7:28 7 :37 7:45 LIGHT TYPE =AM BOLD TYPE =PM to ( q) vom. foothiIItransit .org /BusSchedule.asp)Obusnumber =272 4/4 LENGEND gxmr�sr - we....�.. aewirisx+ esrai+ w:+:+ a. nnn+....+ i. a�..<. ww. w�esws� .ra.�• :rr. «..waas+..�w'^.•,r•• H g 1 City my 8 stop$ °N Schools Hospital qq ♦ Special oa Regular Route, Parks art! #k Y showing Center v e { Cvs �.. `s OP =% NOVO 41 00 ...........'.'` "'81 4 Wr ul � ,''t gxmr�sr - we....�.. aewirisx+ esrai+ w:+:+ a. nnn+....+ i. a�..<. ww. w�esws� .ra.�• :rr. «..waas+..�w'^.•,r•• 9 d d :A:#' te�'" a- ,� vi AW �fca �t e { Cvs �.. `s OP =% NOVO 41 00 ...........'.'` "'81 4 Wr ul � ,''t ,''t ►:11W1I:�! . ►� IJ 4' C14 r- ci rL z CP a. 0 ft a 0 cr a r F- o UJ > F- z LLJ F- In W 2 0 z 0 E E 0 C) (D �2 > C) = > Lu 0 Ir < �E CZ L) p C) U) -E -� z C) 0 O 0 0- w ui ix E w 0 a E 0 0 00 0 Z w O 2 Z O (D -0 uo, -0 > 0) ps S, cz m -,,� (D LC) CZ 0 J. 0 6 2 c'� E (D >-- L E- 21 5; u� -0 a) a) 0 o 15 -5 E -0 m 0 cz co E E �z C3 0 < E E p E 1 3: � '15 -0 OU C) -LD m m -0 0 0)-0 = (D -0 :�2 :�� -0 O (D 2 3�: 3: 55 a) C() OL D E = co co -2 E ('D 2 S c6 0 0) cn Q (>D E S M W in a' E -0 Q) w U 0 U (>D m C) -0 ID :> = (D �n -s -:5 -111� CD ca cl:> 0 M 0 E- CE a) 00 0, E = -2 a) 0, 0 'U 2 -0 Q) 70 -z CZ -0 0 0) E 0 a) Z N 0 0 -0 cal)) Z5 — Cc, 0 2 0,— 'a) m 0 7, -0 -0 C, cu = �5 .2 Iro § a) -0, i s C-11 S N 0- -r- - 0 -0 -6 a) 0 tz U 0 E C to C, (D E c) a) (> U CO co M 0 E 0 < (D 75 L m E� to -0-0 0 G) :� � a) 0- 01 (D & , — BL 3: (D 2- E M 3: 0, a:) 0-2 5 a>, 0 �Cll u) a) 2� M> -,- 0 , -'E c) ED (Z cr — N N 0 E & a) 0 m U m ID (n �:: 0 a) c a) — m am) = — cn .5; -0 a) a) cE > (D 3: E cz �6 = O 0 (D 'Y N Cc U S U 0 Fn :,.2 — -0 w 0 3: D (, 0 — - (D M (D 0 E ct� Z) 2 'r) 2 a) - 0 0 c j 0 a) 0 -2 2 (D 2-0 m co cn IE -,2 t= a, > 0 :> 0 E > 0 - O 0 2) En :�i - m < " °N ou 03 E °2 (3 rz E .2 — .2 m < 0 < a) -2 m < o F- =3 < 75 a) Do 0 E E cn Z Z Lu cr 2 W c-0 Z 0 cl) 0 Z O a) 0 O� cu z U W C% E LO 0-) 07 h- O 0 z o L- L) 0 .0 > � � c f m c cu z 0 a) (D a) - E2 75 E (D E E a) E aE, E E 1� 0 0 f_- p 0 = C-) 2 0 0 = OD 2 -F .5 5 a) -rz m 0 w 0 m 0 w ol cu I-_ 0 Lu 0 o Lli 0 U) cm CID m ui cm _0 _R3 z 0 5 2 -0 7D) co 111 CD cu I CL C) CL CL LL z w o 2 z C) ID UJ -0 2 —'0 0 F- o Cb cu 0) IUD 0 -0 E 0 F-- 0 . Z5 t 0 _c_- m — = - -6 cc _0 0 r.) 0 t C p <D CL -55 ID Zo E 0 -;5 70 0 E 1-: w 0 cu CD- < E = Z5 E = cz 0 E -E cu < < CL I_- (OD m 0) 12- ID - a) CL (D CL a) 0 ca m 0 (D co SD Lo cQ 0) < < :S - 0 (D m 0) m < cu (D _0 E (D a) E CD o C�> CO ZY � LD a) 0-0 .E 0) 6 cv sz U 0 _0 co > C. 0) -E3 m -0 a) acf i M m (D Q) W (D -2 m Z, ::� co 0 x C5 07 ii �2 z5 E 0 (D 0- m a) -6 a) E -ql m -W, C) m -6 70 C) M 0 m ui cn 0 '(D m :E C, E m 0 -0 75 -0 Cl) c,, �E t 0 0 3: f-- 0) '§ F 0) E Z S > I_- m > LL a) O(" _0 M Cc' MQ fn z 0) , T "in m 0 am) M) 7 m C) M cu m cn S 12 E c'OD 00 a; m _0 a) .2-0 LO (D E 0 E -5 50 2 - a) M 0 :2 0 M 0 75 CD Q a) co U La- 5, C, 0 0- C, -cn m- UG) (D m (ED c. m 0- M- E cD 0 :E m 0- 0 m 8 cn E -0 m m m 0 CY 0 < 0 'o < 0 cz 6,o f 10 E � 5 I cc -05 — CD -S a) -0 0 a) CZ 'D -o a) -5 co 0 (MD < -0 M a, 0 C�l cz = J-- R: 0 m — = M M C/) ID C) M 0 a) m cc -0 0- w a) 2 21 LL m m E LL F) -0 a, m cc CD (D I)o (D C w —0 Lu C? E Z-� �D- O 0 0 6 =u w E 2 2 O :E 6- .92 a) a) , (z E c5 w m E (D a) E 0 0 0 c-- cz .2 0 .2 c-0 cO C) — 0 .2 E Cv E E I-- 0 E G) 76 cc CD tm 0 0 = M C-) — m -C,5 'ro 0 cc -0 ZM 0 E = 0 CL W 0 u) 2 -0 C� 0_ (D C) I " a) 15 m C) ca. Z, a) = m 0 -0 (D z Z 2 Z 0 (D 'r � 0 Z > o a) o m o ID o (D 0 't 0) m :t-_ -'r 0) 'ffi m 76 0) m 0) 0 0- 0 CL 0) 0 00- z =- C) C3 - U � 0 0 uj z a) < U) ¢ CO m m C'/') :E z U) E 0) r- 0 O Z CU o 0 O 0 > .cm a) cu F- n 0 0 z 0 CL LU -j Co co z 0 CL to w U. z w 62 it 0 z LU < Z5 :s 15 Q) S'E CO 0 2 — E �- :' 0, ID —M 6 cm a) CD- m 0) _0 cc ID 2 x ,, -) E a- a) — IS MX a) X m N ca Z� a�, w 2 0 -0 0 0 m C) (D -0 co z3 72 M Q) 0 -S cn 0 (D F (D o,'—E C, m si 'w -Fu a) t 6 -o E a) 1-2 C', OL ID -LD E 2 M -2 ID -SE 'D C� E cNO ns C° CO a) o E ui -2 an) 5 w w 6 — -0— 0 .2 m w CD o -0 �2 7W cr a) W 0 CDL CD M 2 (D -0 o 2 z, M E m a) E E cn -2 O)o -2 o Lo 0, m 0 0 0 E am) C) 0 C) �o L) o a) -0 0— z 0- LM 0 E a) 01 -6 2 'o o - C) E w 0 2 m 0 11 2 >0< o- -.6 cO) (D a) �- , -:2 a) 1c, 0) 0� t E CD- a) a) -2 E a) a) < 6 m E =3 (D -0 ou 2 U 0) -LD 175 0,G) -T o 0 0 7-0 -2 2 2 cz Q3 "E L CL — �zj -2 m C) �- 75 0 = , -, - ,_ -0 c;, 6 C, , = 2 a) --6 o— S.2 OE S) 0 :5 E o _ E LD CC c �S� 0 E 2 m U) 0.2 0- m L) Z 0 0 -F, ZE 0 2 w T m m C, CM M CL <D E o 2 u) m 2 2 m cc a) -2 -5 co E co o C) E c4 m -0 c) 0 0 (D vi '6) 7r f-- D M ; Z5 0- a) = L) = -ru M Ell 0 �Ln 0 0 :5 c a) m w 0 0 C.) -�5 0 0 a) -I-- , (�5 , L) -, co m =0 = :2, T E -c- um> E E a) 0 mo o Z5 2 0 -&3 E 0 0 a) 0 C) 0 C 2 0 F 2 0 L) 0 2 m a co u a) -j z Z w Z 0 0 Z 0 z tu General Plan Amendment Zone Change Code Amendment Development Plan C'.PA Cnncenfiinl Annrr)\/nl . - . __ r­_1 . .11-1 - . - Redevelopment Overlay Zone Variance Conditional Use Permit Administrative Adjustment X Specific Plan Other Name of Applicant(s) KLL INVESTMENTS, LLC Address2863 MARICOPA STREET, TORRANCE, CA 90503 Phone No.(714) 745-7335 — CapacityOWNER Owner(s) of RecordKLL INVESTMENTS, LLC Owner's AddressSEE ABOVE PTOPEZTY INFORMATION a _7 Location CORNER OF BALDWIN PARK BLVD. AND MERCED AVENUE Assessor Parcel Number(s) 8552-017-004, -068, -069, -070, -071, -072, -073, -074, -075, -076, -077, -078 Tract and Lot Number(s) TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 72195 Existing General Plan Designation KENNAN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN -------- Existing Zoning for each Parcel KENNAN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN Existing Land UseSINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, RELIGIOUS, MIXED-USE, COMMERCIAL, SCHOOL Code Section to be Amended Amend the Kennan Center Specific Plan and the zoning Purpose of request Amend the Kennan Center Specific Plan to reflect the change in development from mixed-use to residential (51 townhomes and a wireless facility), which will also change the zoning. CERTIFICATION STATEMENT: I/we acknowledge the filing of this application and certify that all the above information is true and accurate and that I/we have familiarized myself/ourselves with the relevant provision of the Baldwin Park Planning Division (Note: a person acting as agent of the owner of record must complete and have notarized the attached Owner's Affidavit from the legal owner.) &1ture Date Signature FOR CITY USE ONLY: File No: Fee: Date Received by: — Date: TYPE OF APPLICATION —A—Tentative Tract Map Tentative Parcel Map Lot Line Adjustment *Name of Applicant(s) KLL INVESTMENTS, LLC Address 2863 MARICOPA STREET, TORRANCE, CA 90503 Phone No.(714) 745 -7335 Capacity OWNER * Owner(s) of Record KLL INVESTMENTS, LLC Owner's Address 2863 MARICOPA STREET, TORRANCE, CA 90503 Owner's Phone Number(714) 745 -7335 *Engineer or Surveyor NameHERSEL M. ZAHAB PE - LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS Address 1520 BROOKHOLLOW DRIVE, SUITE 33, SANTA ANA CA 92705 Phone Number (714) 557 -77(•t Registration NumberRCE NO. 44560 PROPERTY INFORMATION LocationCORNER OF BALDWIN PARK BLVD, AND MERCED AVENUE Assessor Parcel Number(s) 8552- 017 -004, -068, -069, -070, -071, -072, -073, -074, -075, -076, -077, -078 Existing Use of Property VACANT Proposed Use of PropertySINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOMES Number of Proposed Residential Units 51 Special lnformationAPPLICA -�'P )N IS FOR A ONE -LOT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES CERTIFICATION STATEMENT: Itwe acknowledge the filing of this application and certify that all the above information is true and accurate and that Vwe have familiarized myselflourselves with the relevant provisions of the land subdivision process. (Note: a person acting as agent of the owner of record must complete and have notarized the attached Owner's Affidavit from the legal owner.) �� �'•/L ARM _ Signature Date Date -------- - - - - - — ____---_--------------------------------------------------------------------_-_----------_------------- FOR CITY USE ONLY: File N6:[ t ` 45WReceived by: Date: i 114 JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT Tentative Tract No. 72195 and Amendment to the Kennan Center Specific Plan Zone Change 1. The proposed use (residential townhomes) will benefit the adjoining neighborhood and Justification City if Baldwin Park in a variety of ways. The proposed project will provide new housing for existing residents of Baldwin Park, as well as attract new residents. This, in turn, will positively impact the economic growth of Baldwin Park and the businesses located throughout. This development aims to enhance the adjoining neighborhood aesthetically and by providing improvements to the project frontages along Merced Avenue, Baldwin Park Boulevard, and Kenmore Avenue. By amending the Specific Plan and changing the existing zoning to primarily residential condominiums, this proposed development will coincide with adjacent residential properties. 2. 1 cs property, although vacant at this time, was zoned for mixed -use, consisting of a church, a commercial component, single family residences, a school, and a wireless facility. Although it is proposed that the wireless facility remain, the rest of the project will now match the zoning of adjacent properties, making it a cohesive neighborhood. 3. The proposed use will not be detrimental to surrounding properties. The proposed development is a gated community and is intended to function independently without disturbance to neighboring properties. 4. 7)ut -e are no deed restrictions, to our knowledge, for the development of this property. Specific Plan 1. This application is for an amendment to the existing Kennan Center Specific Plan. Due to Justification a change in ownership of the property, as well as changes to the economy, neighborhood needs, and studies based on viable uses of the property, we feel these unique circumstances justify the need for this specific plan amendment. 2. After studying the existing property and the best uses of the land in relation to its locale, we f�4,n-1 confident that a residential community is the logical place and use for this project. 3. This amendment to the Kennan Center Specific Plan will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City. There is no longer a commercial component to this project, making it a residential community, rather than a mixed -use development. This change in land use is beneficial to the City of Baldwin Park, introducing new residents and a greater sense of community. 4. There are no deed restrictions, to our knowledge, for the development of this property. Proposed Modification of Structure to House Existing Wireless Facilities and Addition of Monopine with Antennas to replace existing Church Tower installation Site Location of Existing Wireless Facilities: on Baldwin Park Blvd, near Merced Ave APN #: 8552 - 017 -069 and 070 KLL investments LL C (Prnperty Owner) and vier izon� Atireless ; AT" vv'ireless (Wireless eless Providers) are proposing an upgrade modification to an existing wireless communication facility and the relocation of antennas from an existing church tower to a new Monopine at the subject site. The proposed modification and additions are adequate in both size and shape for its function and purpose. The wireless telecommunication facilities are already in existence and on -air. The proposed modification and additions shall provide enhanced coverage and better data connections for both cellular and web users (homes and businesses) in said vicinity of Baldwin Park. The site has sufficient access to streets and highways adequate in width and pavement type to carry the quantity and quality of street traffic generated by the proposed use by way of existing roads. The traffic generated by this project is minimal, as the site contains unmanned facilities with regular routine maintenance purposes only. The wireless facilities (equipment rooms and generators) are mostly already in existence, and shall be equipped with modern equipment. New upgraded state -of- the -arts antennas shall be replacing the older generation existing antennas to be relocated from the existing church tower to a new Monopine, which shall be easily accessible by the surrounding streets. The proposed modification and additions will not have an adverse effect upon adjacent properties as the site is already in existence and shall be improved aesthetically to blend in with the proposed development of the Specific Plan. Colors and designs of the facilities shall be integrated and compatible with surrounding developments. The equipment is contained in specified, designated areas that do not protrude past property lines. The antennas on the new Monopine will be painted to match so as to reduce visual impact. The proposed modification and additions conform to the General Plan as wireless communications consumption continues to grow with higher demand for quality data and cellular coverage. Both the General Plan and the proposed wireless telecommunication facilities upgrades are essential to the communication needs of many families and businesses in the immediate area. f> CITY OF BALDWIN PARK CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL e (TENTATIVE) PROJECT: TM 72195 Date: November 25, 2014 3625, 3637, 3649 Baldwin Park Blvd, 13821, 13825 Kenmore Ave, 13912, 13922.13930.13940 Merced REQUIRED? YES NO COMPLIED/ COMMENTS SECTION A - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1 Planning a) Land Use, Zoning, Setbacks, etc ✓ b) Conditions set forth in the Environmental Assessment ✓ ci Prior to [ieylnnuig puns and designs nor building or for on-site improvements, the Planning Department will require submission of conceptual plans for staff review d) Building or on -site improvements will require Design Review coordinated by the Planning Department e) CC &R's will be required and must be finalized and approved by the City Attorney prior to Final Map approval 2 Building & Safety a) Except for Demolition Permits, prior to issuance of any Building Permits, the ✓ Must demo all existing structures Final Map must be recorded or the existing legal property lines must not prior to Final Map approval interfere with proposed project b) Plan checking and permitting is required by the Building and Safety Division prior to any work on buildings including: Foundation, Plumbing, Electrical, Framing, Roof, and HVAC 3 Public Works a) Adhere to State of California Subdivision Map Act 1 ✓ b) Final Map ✓ Based on field survey ✓ Closure Sheets ✓ Centerline ties ✓ Boundary monuments ✓ Submit Boundary Survey Dedications, Offers of Dedication, Easements ✓ Dedicate 20' of land for frontage of lot on Baldwin Park Blvd, on the side Utility Easement c) Prior to Final Map approval, must have all designs and plans in Section E approved by the City or relevant agency d) Prior to Final Map Approval, must complete all conditioned off -site improvements or enter into a Subdivision Agreement satisfactory to the City Engineer which would guarantee full completion of all public improvements. e) Meet Los Angeles County Fire Department Access Requirements f) Meet Los Angeles County Fire Department Water Flow Requirements g) All contractors / developers must adhere to the City's C &D Ordinance, and obtain clearance for C &D on every construction permit. h) Final Title Report ( Guarantee, must be submitted and updated to within 10 days of Final Map approval ✓ I I I If required by utility companies Must complete all off -sites improvements or deposit a cash bond ZI ' CITY OF BALDWIN PARK - CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ,* (TENTATIVE) PROJECT: TM 72195 Date: November 25, 2014 3625, 3637, 3649 Baldwin Park Blvd, 13821, 13825 Kenmore Ave, 13912, 13922.13930 13940 Merced REQUIRED? YES NO COMPLIED / COMMENTS SECTION B - STUDIES REQUIRED 1 Traffic Impact Study ✓ Perform a Traffic Impact Study at the instersections of Baldwin Park Blvd and Merced Ave, and Kenmore Ave and Baldwin Park Blvd. and at Main Entry Point -may require Traffic signal modifications and restriping of pavement lanes and marking on Merced Ave. 2 Hydrology Study ✓ a) Submit a SWPPP to the State Water Quality Control Board ✓ Submit copy to city and keep on -site during construction. b) Submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) and a SUSMP Evaluation Form to the Engineering Division for review and approval. ✓ c) Submit a results of a double ring infrltrometer test to establish ground infiltration rates and sizing of stormwater capture device. 3 Utility Availability / Sewer Capacity I Readiness -to -serve ✓ Requires willingness to serve letter from all utilities. SECTION C - ON SITE IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED 1 Demolition ✓ Demo all interfering structures prior to Final Map 2 Grading or Drainage ✓ Infiltration system will be required for I the proposed tract. implement Low Impact Development Standards. 3 Pad Certification ✓ Pad /footing certification required for each building 4 Construct on -site pavement, minimum 3 -inch AC on 4 inch CAB or 6 -inch PCC ✓ Required as part of the on compacted native soil or reinforced 4 -inch PCC per soils report Grading /Drainage Plan and prior to Certificate of Occupancy 5 Construct trash enclosure, nominal size 5 feet X 9 feet with PCC slab ✓ Per planning Standards 6 Driveway ✓ Revise the Site Plan to show a wider main entry (vehicles). 7 Parking Stalls ✓ Incorporate the parking stall standard of 10' X 20'. 8 Landscaping ✓ As required by Planning Department SECTION D - OFF SITE IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED 1 Utilities - Each parcel is required to have separate utilities ✓ Underground from Merced Ave to Property, from Baldwin Park Blvd to property, and from Kenmore Ave to Property a) Water ✓ Connection or service b) Electrical ✓ Connection or service c) Gas ✓ Connection or service d) Telephone, Cable ✓ Connection or service e) Storm Drain, Catch Basins, Culverts ✓ Connection or service, Construction Per LAC County Standards f) Sanitary Sewer ✓ Connection or service. Construction Per LAC County Standards CITY OF BALDWIN PARK CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (TENTATIVE) PROJECT: TM 72195 Date: November 25, 2014 3625, 3637, 3649 Baldwin Park Blvd, 13821, 13825 Kenmore Ave, 13912, 13922 13930 13940 Merced REQUIRED? YES NO COMPLIED /COMMENTS 2 Street Improvements ✓ a) Roadway Improvements ✓ Implement Green Streets Improvements on Baldwin Park Blvd and on Merced Ave. b) Curb & Gutter ✓ Along entire frontage of property on Baldwin Park Blvd and Merced Ave to close existing drive approaches, for new drive approach and to repair existing curb and gutter. Must also repair curb and gutter of adjacent parcels if damaged as a result of t i construction or subdivision work. c) Curb Only d) Drive Approaches e) Wheel Chair Ramps f) Cross- Gutters g) Sidewalk - Install irrigation and provide landscaping to parkways h) Landscaped Medians i) Street Trees j) Street Lights k) Traffic Signals ✓ I ( f Revise the Site Plan to show a wider main entry (vehicles). ✓ Along entire frontage of property on Baldwin Park Blvd, Merced Ave Ave., Kenmore Ave Must also repair sidewalk and parkway of adjacent parcels if damaged from construction or subdivision work. ✓ Street Trees removed shall be replaced with new 24 inch box trees per City Tree Master plan at City approved locations. Plant street trees per City standard 50' apart on the entire frontage of the property ✓ Provide lighting along entire frontage of property on both Baldwin Park Blvd and Merced Ave per City Master Street Lighting Plan. ✓ Improvements of traffic signal at Merced Ave and Baldwin Park Blvd will be required upon concurrance of results of city approved traffic study by developer's CA licensed traffic enoineer. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (TENTATIVE) PROJECT: TMI 72195 Date: November 25, 2014 3625, 3637, 3649 Baldwin Park Blvd, 13821, 13825 Kenmore Ave, 13912, 1 3922 1 3930 1 3940 Merced REQUIRED? YES NO COMPLIED t COMMENTS SECTION E - PLANS REQUIRED 1 Site Plan - Show Existing (Must show sufficient information beyond the property ✓ limits to appropriately propose and design improvements) a) Property lines, building(s) or structure(s), grades, contours, flow lines, etc, ✓ h) Ariacent public in, rovements Isicfewalk car, & utt r parkways, tre Street Ughte hydrants) c) Adjacent underground & overhead utilities (gas, sewer, water, storm drains, catch basins, power poles) I 2 Site plan - Show Proposed: ✓ Show all proposed improvements. a) Property lines, demolition limits, proposed removals ✓ b) Buildings /structures (w /approximate square footages), grades, contours, flow lines, ✓ etc c) Public improvements interfacing with project (sidewalk, drive- approaches, curb &gutter, parkways, trees, street lights, hydrants) d) Utility connections for each property and /or building(s) ✓ e) Sufficient detail to characterize proposed land development project ✓ 3 Grading or Drainage Plan, Post Construction BMP's ✓ Grading plan required for the tract. 4 Erosion Plan and/or Construction BMP's ✓ 1 5 Storm Water Mitigation Plan ✓ Pay fee see attached fee schedule. Implement LID's. Submit recorded post construction BMP maintenance agreement. 6 SUSMP Plan ✓ As determined by SUSMP evaluation form (see attachment for further details) 7 Sewer Plan ✓ Submit a sewer plan that indicates sewer lateral to each unit. 8 Utility Plan ✓ This plan may be combined with street improvement plan, if not too cluttered. a) Underground all utilities to each unit/building ✓ remove two wooden poles on Baldwin Park Blvd and two wooden poles on Foster Ave. b) Relocate interfering underground utilities ✓ Utilities are not allowed to cross proposed or existing property lines c) Provide electrical power service - Obtain plan and permit approval from SCE ✓ d) Provide Sewer Lateral to property .✓ 8" main lateral min. e) Separate sewer connection for each building ✓ Each unit must have independent sewer lateral with clean -out per plumbing code. f) Cap off existing sewer connection that will no longer be used g) Provide Water service to each proposed parcel - Obtain plan approval and permit ✓ from Water Company h) Separate water service for each building or separate ownership ,✓ Each unit must have independent water service i) Replace existing old /substandard water service ✓ Per water company recommendation j) Install backflow device for domestic water/iandscape irrigation, certified testing ✓ per water company standards k) Upgrade existing substandard hydrant ✓ If required by Fire Department I) install new hydrant per Water Company Standard .✓ if required by Fire Department m) install fire sprinklers ✓ If required by Fire Department n) Satisfy Fire Department fire flow requirements ✓ ` ' ' o> CITY OF BALDWIN PARK CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (TENTATIVE) PROJECT: TM 72195 Date: November, 25, 2014 3625, 3637, 3649 Baldwin Park Blvd, 13821, 13825 Kenmore Ave, 13912, 1 3922 13930 13940 Merced . REQUIRED? YES NO COMPLIED /COMMENTS 9 Street Plan a) Remove existing driveway approach that will no longer be used. Rep /ace depressed ✓ Drive approach must align with curb &'gutter proposed driveway b) Construct PCC driveway approach 6- inches thick per City Standard ✓ Construct new driveway approaches per plan. All driveway approaches Ishaii meet with ADA (American with ( Disability Act) requirements. c) Construct wheel chair ramp per City Standard ✓ At Baldwin Park Blvd and Merced Ave. SWC and Baldwin Park Blvd. and Kenmore NWC. d) R &R broken concrete sidewalk adjacent to property. ✓ City reserves the right to require replacement of broken S/W e) R &R broken curb /gutter adjacent to property ✓ City reserves the right to require replacement of broken C &G f) R &R roadway pavement section & street improvements as noted. Pavement section ✓ Cap utility trench per City standard requires approval by City Engineer g) install street lights ✓ Per City Master Street Lighting Plan h) Provide channelization or striping plan for the roadway pavement improvements i) Plant parkway trees per City Standard and City Master Tree Plan, 24 -inch box ✓ See condition D -2, 24" box trees minimum (15 gallon tree allowed if parkway is irrigated) j) Construct tree wells per City Standard with tree grates (commercial areas) 10 Traffic Control Plan ✓ For any period during construction during which public streets are obstructed. SECTION F - PERMITS REQUIRED A permit from Public Works is required for all offsite improvements 1 Demolition ✓ Must be completed before final map 2 Construction & Demolition Debris Permit ✓ One permit before Demo, separate permit for Construction. 3 General Construction Activity Storm Water Permit (GCASWP) ✓ GCASWP must be obtained prior to Grading Permit Issuance (see Attachment for further details) 4 Grading or Drainage ✓ Obtain grading permit before building permit. 5 Utility Permits from each utility owner +� 6 Sewer Connection Permit (city owned sewer system) ✓ Will need to also pay for Sewer Capital Fees (see Fees Section) 7 Excavation permit from the City for all utility installations in the Public ROW ✓ 8 Construction Permit for Off. Site Improvements (street improvements) ✓ 9 Building Permits as necessary from B &S ✓ F> CITY OF BALDWIN PARK CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL :X (TENTATIVE) PROJECT: TM 72195 Date: November 25, 2014 3625, 3637, 3649 Baldwin Park Blvd, 13821, 13825 Kenmore Ave, 13912, REQUIRED ?l YES I NO =CTION G - FEES & ASSESSMENTS REQUIRED !COMMENTS See attached fee schedules - subject to change by City council action. Fee charged will be the effective fee at the time of fee payment If off -site improvements are not bonded for, payment for permits is required prior to Final Map recordation. If off -site improvements are bonded for, payment for permits is not required prior to Final Map recordation. 1 Plan Checks a) Pay Final Map fee ✓ See Public Works fee schedule (attached) b) Pay Grading Plan Check fee (fee based on import / export - must submit ✓ See Public Works fee schedule quantity estimate) I (attached) c) Pay Drainage Plan Check Fee ✓ See Public Works fee schedule (attached) d) Pay Erosion Control Plan Check Fee ✓ See Public Works fee schedule (attached) e) Pay Storm Water Mitigation Plan Check Fee ✓ See Public Works fee schedule (attached) f) Pay Sewer Plan Check fee (fee based on materials cost - must submit cost ✓ See Public Works fee schedule estimate of sewer improvements material) (attached) g) Pay Plan Check fees for Off -Site / Public Improvements (fee based on cost - ✓ See Public Works fee schedule must submit cost estimate of public improvements) (attached) h) Pay Plan Check fees for On -Site / Building improvements ✓ Issued by Building & Safety Division, check with that Division 2 Permits ✓ a) Pay for Demolition Permit / On -Site Improvements ✓ Issued by Building & Safety Division, check with that Division b) Pay for Construction & Demolition Debris Permit ✓ See Public Works fee schedule (attached) c) Pay for Grading / Drainage Permit / On -Site improvements to PW ✓ See Public Works fee schedule (attached) d) Pay for Building Permit / On -Site Building Improvements to B &S ✓ Issued by Building & Safety Division, check with that Division e) Pay for Excavation Permit / Off -Sites to PW (for utilities) ✓ See Public Works fee schedule (attached) f) Pay for Sewer Permit & Inspection ✓ $500 for each saddle installed, $100 for each dwelling unit added g) Pay for Construction Permit / Off -Site Street Improvements to PW ✓ See Public Works fee schedule (attached) CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ' - CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (TENTATIVE) 5� , b PROJECT: TM 72195 Date: November 25, 2014 3625, 3637, 3649 Baldwin Park Blvd, 13821, 13825 Kenmore Ave, 13912, 13922 13930 13940 Merced REQUIRED? YES NO COMPLIED / COMMENTS 3 Assessments ✓ a) Special Assessments b) School Fees ✓ As determined by Building & Safety c) Traffic Impact ✓ d) Sewer Connectinn Fees e) Pay sewer capital facility charge ✓ $800 per lot developed or created. See Public Works fee schedule (attached) f) Quimby ✓ As determined by Planning Department 4 Subdivision Agreement ✓ Cash bond only prior to Final Map. All offsites must be completed prior to Certificate of Occupancy. a) Provide performance bond ✓ b) Provide labor and material bond ✓ Compiled by: Reviewed by: Approved b� .. Director of P lic Works / City Engineer O a> '-a G Sr O G ^L3 G i.r G ON I E+ O ,4? O O" U � U � � U cd 4' U � U r O � O � U Ld _ CZ .�. O �^ U cl:, �. N�,.f.1 �J h() eOV U c0 U '� s o 't7 cd c+Oa bo o �. p cd O to U U o O bD Ct o U H '�✓ H o N r bD U Cj ❑ - CII 4 ❑ � cd cd > ❑ O a3i v, r `t ? N cd u U ct H 3 co a 0 w N m t in U � Q z O ct U cn v O cd S.; 03� � •-� bi H (''� 0 /�U i�••I N ct vVD ° U pa❑ C. ❑❑ ❑❑❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑ E Q$ It o bi zs U U 110, o un g • ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Recording Requested By and Mail to: City Of Baldwin Park Department Of Public Works 14406 East Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, CA 91706 This Space for Recorder's Use Only CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE Covenant and Agreement to Hold Property as One Parcel The undersigned hereby certify that we are the owners of the hereinafter legally described real property located in the City of Baldwin Park, County of Los Angeles, State of California: All of Lots 1, 2, 3, 5, 72, 74, 76, and 77 of Licensed Surveyor's Map as shown in Book 14, Page 30 of Licensed Surveyor's Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County; also the Southeast 20 feet of the Northeast 70 feet of lot 68 of said Licensed Surveyor's Map; also the Northeast 70 feet of lot 69 of said Licensed Surveyor's Map; also the Northeast 71 feet of Lot 70 of said Licensed Surveyor's Map; also the Northeast 110 feet of Lot 71 of said Licensed Surveyor's Map; and also Lot 4 and Lot 75 of said Licensed Surveyor's Map; and also the Northeast 88 feet of Lot 73 of said Licensed Surveyor's Map, PROPERTY ADDRESS: 3649 Baldwin Park Boulevard, 13912, 13922, 13930, 13940 Merced Avenue; 13821, 13825 Kenmore Avenue, Baldwin Park, California 91706 We do hereby covenant and agree with said City that the above legally described land shall be held as one parcel and no portion shall be sold separately, except as hereinafter provided, or as subsequently subdivided under the State of California Subdivision Map Act. This covenant and agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon ourselves, and future owners, encumbrances, their successors, heirs, assignees and shall continue in effect until such time that the use or purpose herein above referred to is terminated or otherwise released by authority of the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park. Dated this day of Signature NOTARY PUBLIC CERTIFICATE ) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS 12015 (Sign) (Sign) At this day of , 2015 before me personally appeared and (he /she) acknowledged this instrument by (him /her) sealed and subscribed to be (his /her) free act and deed. Approved for Recording: By: Director of Public Works Date GA180 Land DevelopmentUractMapsUM 72195- Condos 3625,3637,3649 Baldwin Park Blvd & 13821, 13825 Kenmore, \CertificateCompliance Post con Maintenance ag-reement.doc SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES - ENGINEERING FEES EXHIBIT `'A" General Engineering Fees (Non - Construction) Reproduction Costs Sepia (any size) $6.50 / first & Photo copy prints (24" x 18" & 24" x 36 ") $4.00 1each additional print Final Map photo copy (8' /2" X 11" or 8' /2n x 14 ") $0.50 ea Encroachment Lane Closure — No Street Cuts • rer Occurrence P I I Z) • Monthly Permit $450 • Annual Permit $3,750 • Approved Road Closure (if Public Convenience Dictates) $650 / day All utility permits for excavation or street cuts in the City's right -of -way or in the City's future right -of -way as determined by the City's General Plan shall be required of utility companies Moving and Load Regulations $55 ea Permit filing.an.d processing fee for Moving Load or Over -Sized Vehicle (over width, height, or weight) per occurrence Overhead Structures (i.e. scaffolding) $500 ea Verification of Sewer. Connection Dye Test (permittee to provide dye) $200 ea or bid cost + 15% Signs in the Right -of -Way Street Name Change Application $1,500 Directional: Signs Directional Signs — Private $2,500 for two years New signs shall be changed upon renewal of two year period Graffiti Abatement' Processing Hold- Harmless Agreement for private Property $25 Penalties Work Corr enced Prior to Permit Issuance Double the Total Fee If any is commenced on the public's right -of -way without a permit, the P.ttee must obtain an after -the -fact permit. If it is determined that the work was an emergency in nature and it is approved by the Director of Public Works, then the after - the -fact permit fee will be charged as a regular permit fee. f \�� . Page 1 of 8 -�.. SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES - ENGINEERING FEES Land Development / Subdivision Land Development 1 Subdivision Tentative Parcel Map, Tentative Tract Map (First Ten Lots or Units) (Lots or Units 11 -25) add (Lots or Units Site Plan Review Parcel Map (Final Map) Tract Map Final Map) Easement Deed* Easement Checking* Monument inspection $3,0Q0 $3,500 $50 / Lot or Unit $30 / Lot or Unit - -- ___ -. - - -- $2,500 $3,000 + 75 /parcel $a,500 + 75 /fat $500 $500 m, nn r n n.. cnn � 100 per monument ! fVli . 500 Verification that the City Map is consistent with conditions of tentative $400 approval $2,000 Verification that City Grant of Waiver and Certificate of Compliance are $400 consistent with conditions of tentative approval $750 Agreement and /or Improvement Security $450 ea Extension of Time for Improvement Agreement $500 per letter Fourth Submittal of Originals &/or Prints $1,300 Sixth Submittal of Originals &/or Prints, additional $1,300 Eighth Submittal of Originals Wor Prints & Each Subsequent Submittal, $1,300 additional Extension of Time for Final Map Six Months $275 One Year $550 Recordation Fees First Sheet at $8 Second Sheet and all Subsequent Sheets $3 ea Certificate of Correction $1,200 Certificate of Compliance $2,000 Street Vacation* $2,000 Covenant and Agreement* $750 Lot Line Adjustment $3,000 Miscellaneous Documents $1,600 `The fee for these items includes only the review of the legal description and the research associated with the particular case. However, if the City provides the legal description — add $150 to the fee indicated. Expedite Map /Plan Check 1 1/2 times the fee For items not covered in the Fee Schedule a minimum of one (1) hour will be charged at the minimum hourly rate of $50 Sewer Connection Fees Connection Fees by Los Angeles County Sanitation District See City of Baldwin Park Building & Safety Division Page 2 of 8 SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES - ENGINEERING FEES Plan Check / Design Review - Onsite Improvements The following fees are separate from and in addition to any fees charged by the B &S Div. Grading and Excavation Plan Check Yardage 50 to 100 CY 101 to 1,000 CY 1,001 to 10,000 CY 10,001 to 100,000 CY Over 100,000 CY Fourth Submittal and each Subsequent Subs m �ittal for Grading, Drainage and Improvement Plan Checks Base Amount $300 minimum $300 + 80 per $1,020 + 90 per $1,830 + 100 per $2,730 + 100 per Volume in CY 100 1,000 10,000 100,000 25% of the Original Plan Check Fee Exceeding CY !! !�! 10,00 ! ) !!• Sewer Plan Plan Checking fee is included in the fee for Plan Check of Sewer and /or Utility Plan under Offsite Improvements Drainage Plan Plan Checking fee is included in the fee for Plan Check of Grading & Excavation Plan, if a Grading and Excavation Plan is required, else the following may apply: One (1) lot to three (3) lots $175 Four (4) lots or more $650 Permit & Inspection Fee will also apply (100% of the Plan Check Fee) Erosion Plan Less than One Acre $100 One Acre but less than 5 Acres $300 Permit & Inspection Fee will also apply (100% of the Plan Check Fee) Page 3 of 8 SCHEDULE C]FFEES AND CHARGES - ENGINEERING FEES Plan Check f Design Review - Offsite Improvements Improvement Plans / Street Improvements A fee shall be charged at the time of plan submittal in the amount set forth below. Improvement Valuation Plan Check Fee $U—SSB $175. fee $1.000 -8.999 $175+1196X (Valuation over 1.OUO\ $10.000 -49.999 $1,1O5+8%X (Valuation over 1O,O00\ �5O'000—S9' 9S8 4�� X (Valuation �4 . 3�5+ , - $100,000 -989'999 $O.3S5+296x (Valuation over 10U.00[) $1'DDO,UOO and over $24`3O5+1.5% (Valuation over 1'O0O'OOO) BasiaofVa|Vadon The following tables provide a basis of valuation to determine plan check fees for off site improvements. The basis of valuation is e refonance, and costs for labor may change from time to time with some correlation to unit pricing related to construction costs. Stneet{nmprovenments - Va|uaton Note: In no event shall the minimum permit fee be less than $175.00. Curb only Rolled Curb Cross Gutter Curb and Gutter Parkway Landscaping Sidewalk (A" P.C.C] Drive Approach (6-"P.C.C] Crushed Aggregate Base Asphalt Pavement Less than 4`thick More than 4"thick Wheelchair Ramp (4`P.C.C) Mainline Sewer Installation: 12" O\(C.P. 8"O\/.C.P. 6~O\(C.P. Manhole Storm Drain Improvements -Valuation Note: In no event shall the minimum permit fee be less than $175. Construction Of New Catch Basin C.B, Structure or Manhole Modification of Existing C.B. or M.H. Drain Pipe/Roof[}oain Parkway [)rain Storm Drain Mainline (RCP) or Storm Drain Lateral (RCP) $36if.+ concrete cost $42it+ concrete cost $4O if. + concrete cost $42it+ concrete cost $3 sq. ft. + materials cost $10 sq. ft, + concrete cost $12oq. ft, + concrete cost $2,50 sq. ft. + nnsteha| cost $3 sq. ft. + asphalt cost $4sq, ft. + asphalt cost 81.5OOea+ concrete cost $75 if +rnatera| cost $7Oit+ material cost $8Oif.+ material cost $3'5OOor bid- cost +15% Transition S4.5OO ea. O[ Bid +15% $3,000 ea. or Bid + 15% $SOit or Bid + 1596 $8OO ea. o[ Bid +1596 $250 if. O[ Bid + 15% $15O{.f.o[ Bid +1596 SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES - ENGINEERING FEES Plan Check f Design Review - Offsite Improvements (cont Traffic Improvements - Valuation Striping or Lane line Marking $0.25 I.f. Lettering /Arrow $25 ea Red Curb $100 + 10 /ft. Street Name Signs (2) & Post $350 ea Traffic Regulatory Sign $250 ea Traffic Signals $20,000+ Bid Cost Traffic Control Plan Check $85 + $75 per hour it done separately from other s'tree't improvements Other Improvements - Valuation Street Light. $500 + Bid Cost Street Tree Installation 15 Gallon $300 24" Box $900 + Tree Cost 36" Box. $1,200 + Tree Cost Page 5 of 8 SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES - ENGINEERING FEES Permit and Inspection Fees - Onsite . Grading and Excavation Permit & inspection CY 50 to 100 CY 101 to 1,000 CY 1,001 to 10,000 CY 10,001 to 100,000 CY Over 100,000 CY Base Amount $300 minimum $300 + 80 per $1,020 + 90 per $1,830 + 100 per $2,730 + 100 per Volume in CY 100 1,000 10,000 100,000 Exceeding CY 100 1,000 10,000 100,000 Drainage Permit & Inspection fee is included in the fee for Permit & Inspection of Grading & Excavation Plan, if a Grading and Excavation Plai is required, else the following may apply: One (1) lot to three (3) lots $250 Four (4) lots or more $1000 This fee is in addition to applicable Plan Check Fees Erosion Less than One Acre $130 One Acre but less than 5 Acres $400 This fee is in addition to applicable Plan Check Fees Re- inspection Fee 3rd and each subsequent Inspection $90 Permits generally require a minimum of 3 inspections: 1St as an initial site meeting with contractor; 2n" meeting to inspect removals, forms, and prep work, and a 3rd inspection to final work. Utility, Pipeline, Foundation, and other Underground work require a 4 I inspection to cover bedding, backfiil, and compaction work. This fee is for a 3d cumulative inspection beyond the minimum for the permit. Permit and Inspection Fees - Offsite Permit & Inspection fee shall be 100% of the Plan Check Fee Unless a specified fee is indicated in Permit & Inspection Fees below Re- inspection Fee 3`d and each subsequent Inspection $90 Permits generally require a minimum of 3 inspections: 15t as an initial site meeting with contractor; 2nd meeting to inspect removals, forms, and prep work; and a 3rd inspection to final work. Utility, Pipeline, Foundation, and other Underground work require a 4th inspection to cover bedding, backfiil, and compaction work. This fee is for a 3�d cumulative inspection beyond the minimum for the permit. Page 6 of 8 SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES - ENGINEERING FEES Utility Permits - Plan Check + Permit and Inspection Fees Utility Permits Plan Check Fee Permit & inspection Fee Trench Length Up to 50' Minimum $50 Min $100, if City does A.C. (+ construct cost)* Min $130, if Utility Co. does A.C. 51' to 250' $50 + $0.30 I.f. > 50' $150 + $0.60 l.f. > 50' 251' to 1,000' $80 + $0.20 I.f. > 250' $220 + $0.50 i.t. > 250' Over 1,000' $185 = $0.10 i.f. > 1,000' $440 + $0.40 Lt. > 1,000' *Up to 200 s.f. add additional $6.00 s.f. for paving to be performed by the City. City to perform the paving unless otherwise directed by the Director of Public Works MOTE: Fees applicable to work performed by both open trench and /or boring methods of installation. Non- Trench Work Up to 100 s.f. Minimum $30.00 Min $100, if City does A.C. (+ construct cost)* Min $125, if Utility Co. does A.C. Over 100 s.f. Pavement Restoration $30 + $0.40 s.f. > 100 s.f. Utility Cuts $5.50 / s.f. is refundable if work performed by Permittee Permittee is required to do pavement restoration. Sewer (plan check & permit inspection) Sewer Saddle (By Los Angeles County DPW) Sewer Connection Permit Fee Residential Commercial & Industrial $150 + $1.50 s.f. > 100 $500 ea or bid cost + 15% $100 / dwelling unit $50 / dwelling unit over 10 units $200 / unit $100 / unit over 10 units The above fees apply to new Subdivisions where Plan Check + Permit & Inspection fees are separately paid for a new sewer mainline extension. Above fees apply to the sewer lateral installed for each unit. Rectangular lot depth, 100 ft or less Rectangular lot depth, more than 100 ft Irregular lot, frontage 60 ft or less Irregular lot, frontage greater than 60 ft Existing Lateral to be utilized by property owner(s) $800 per lot $800 + $0.01 s.f. over 100 ft of depth $800 or + $480 + $0.08 / s.f. for the lot area in excess of 6,000 s.f. (whichever is greater) $800 + $0,08 / s.f. for the lot area in excess of 6,000 s.f. $200.00 / Each Page 7 of 8 SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES - ENGINEERING FEES Special Permits — Plan Check + Permit and Inspection Fees Ministerial Projects Per Hour Rate Director of Public Works $135.00 Assistant Director $90.00 Associate Director $70.00 Assistant Engineer $65.00 Inspector $60.00 Technician $50.00 Clerical $45.00 Traffic Engineer Contract + 15% Operations Supervisor $80.00 Maintenance Worker $50.00 + Equipment Overtime (Minimum of 4 Hrs) Weekdays IY2 X, Weekends and Holidays 2X Materials & Supplies Cost + 15% Storm Water Mitigation Plan Check + Permit & Inspection Fees Single Family Home $170 5 -50 Residential dwelling units $720 1 acre or more industrial/commercial Project $665 Industrial /commercial less than 1 acre $300 Auto Repair or Gasoline Station $400 Restaurant $300 Parking lots less than 5,000 sq. ft. $300 Outdoor handling or storage of materials $550 C&D Materials Management / Integrated Waste Management Fees Application Processing Demolition Phase - Source Separated Recycling 1 st review $300 2nd and each subsequent review $75 Using mixed box program through franchise hauler No charge Construction Phase Source Separated Recycling 1 st review $300 2nd and each subsequent review $75 Using mixed box program through franchise hauler No charge Final Review Via approved applicant generated plan Included in Fee above Utilizing Mixed Box Program Demolition phase + construction $100 Construction phase $100 C &D Materials Management - Re roof project involving tear -off $75 Page 8 of 8 • � � � � � L�, � _ y 6, r COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE PREVENTION DIVISION - �,"aa7ME�` Land Development Unit 5823 Rickenbacker Road y-ft woo oft wpm nwww� Commerce, CA 90040 K=V1.%>1=V Telephone (323) 890 -4243, Fax (323) 890 -97-�3 PROJECT: TTM 72195 CITY: BALDWIN PARK -` zx 14 N(0V 4 r ,r1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ACCESS 1. Fire Department apparatus access shall be extended to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior walls of any future buildings or structures. Verificatioi for compliance will be performed during the architectural plan review prior to building permit issuance. 2. Access as noted on the Tentative and the Exhibit Maps shall comply with Title 21 (County of Los Angeles Subdivision Code) and Section 503 of the Title 32 (County of ► os Angeles Fire Code), which requires all weather access. 3. All proposed streets within this development shall provide approved street names and signs. All future buildings shall provide approved address numbers. Compliance required prior to occupancy to. the satisfaction of the City of Baldwin Park, Public Works and the County of Los Angeles Fire Code. 4. Provide a minimum unobstructed width of 20 feet, exclusive of shoulders, except for approved security gates in accordance with Section 503.6, and an unobstructed vertical clearance "clear to sky" Fire Department vehicular access to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of the building, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building. Fire Code 503. 1.1 & 503.2.1. 5. The Final Map shall be submitted to our office for review and approval prior recordation. Reviewed by: Claudia Soiza Date: November 18, 2014 Page 1 of 3 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE PREVENTION DIVISION Land Development Unit 5823 Rickenbacker Road Commerce, CA 90040 Telephone (323) 890-4243, Fax (323) 890-9783 PROJECT: TTM 72195 MAP DATE: May, 22 2014 CITY: BALDWIN PARK 6. Fire Department vehicular access roads must- be installed and maintained in a serviceable manner prior to and during the time of construction. Fire Code 501.4. 7. Structures and outdoor storage underneath High Voltage Transmission Lines (66 kilovolts or greater) shall comply with Fire Code 316.6 and County of Los Angeles Fire Department Regulation 27. Any proposed construction or land use within 100 feet of the drip line of High Voltage Transmission lines shall be subject to review by the Fire Marshal. 8. Multiple residential buildings having entrances to individual units not visible from the street or road shall have unit numbers displayed in groups for all units within each structure. Such numbers may be grouped on the wall of the structure or mounted on a post independent of the structure and shall be positioned to be plainly visible from the street or road as required by Fire Code 505.3 and in accordance with Fire Code 505.1. 1. Install 3 public fire hydrant(s). As noted on the tentative map or the Exhibit A. Location: AS PER MAP FILED IN OUR OFFICE. 2. All hydrants shall measure 6"x 4"x 2-1/2" brass or bronze, conforming to current AWWA standard C503 or approved equal. 3. The required fire flow for the public fire hydrants on this residential development is 1250 gallons per minute at 20 psi for a duration of 2 hours, over and above maximum daily domestic demand. Reviewed by: Claudia Soiza Date: November 18, 2014 Page 2 of 3 f� �t w COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPAkTMEN FIRE PREVENTION DIVISION Land Development Unit 5823 Rickenbacker Road Commerce, CA 90040 Telephone (323) 890 -4243, Fax (323) 890 -9783 PROJECT: TTM 72195 MAP DATE: May, 22 2014 CITY: BALDWIN PARK 4. Prior to final map clearance, provide written verification that the required fire hydrants have been bonded for in lieu of installation. 5. Vehicular access must be provided and maintained serviceable throughout construction to all required fire hydrants. All required fire hydrants shall be installed, tested, and accepted prior to construction. 6. Parking shall be restricted 30 feet adjacent to any required public fire hydrant, 15 feet on each side measured from the center of the fire hydrant. Adequate signage and /or stripping shall be required prior to occupancy. For any questions regarding the report, please contact Inspector Claudia Soiza at (323) 890 -4243 or at Claudia. Soiza(a fire.lacounty.gov Reviewed by: Claudia Soiza Date: November 18, 2014 Page 3 of 3 • • r �' i 6 1 .111, 11111, • _ • • , ra; t r. ?`cl��f.MR�IGa SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT Fw,.,._. 0 i. . "E€ C t......9 f"°'"'i N IT 1 0 sr' i S F A 1 �, p - � .; . 6 ,r 1955 Workman UJII Road, Whittier, CA 90601 -1400 Nailing Address: P.J. Box 4998, Whittier, CA 90607-4996 Telephone: (562) 699 -7411, FAX: (562) 699 -5422 www.lacsd.oI Ms. Amy L. Harbin, AICP City Planner Planning Division City of Baldwin Park 14403 East Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, CA 91706 Dear Ms. Harbin: GRACE ROBINSON HYDE Chief _Fngineer and General Monoger June 24, 2014 Ref File No.: 3015251 Tentative Tract Map No. 72195,. JUN 2 The County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County (Districts) received the letter and plans for the subject project forwarded by your office on June 9, 2014. The proposed development is located within the jurisdictional boundaries of District No. 15. We offer the following comments regarding sewerage service: The wastewater flow originating from the proposed project will discharge to a local sewer line, which is not maintained by the Districts, for conveyance to the Districts' Baldwin Park Trunk Sewer, located in Frazier Street at Foster Avenue. This 18 —inch diameter trunk sewer has a design capacity of 4.7 million gallons per day (mgd) and conveyed a peak flow of 2.8 mgd when last measured in 2013. 2. The wastewater generated by the proposed project will be treated at the San Jose Creek Water Reclamation. Plant (WRP) located adjacent to the City of Industry, which has a design capacity of 100 mgd and currently processes an average flow of 73.7 mgd. Wastewater flows that exceed the capacity of the San Jose Creek WRP, and all biosolids, are diverted to and treated at the Joint Water Pollution Control Plant located in the City of Carson. The expected increase in average wastewater flow from the project site is 7,553 gallons per day. For a copy of the Districts' average wastewater generation factors, go to www.lacsd.org, Wastewater & Sewer Systems, click on Will Serve Program, and click on the Table 1, Loadings for Each Class of Land Use link. 4. The Districts are empowered by the California Health and Safety Code to charge a fee for the privilege of connecting (directly or indirectly) to the Districts' Sewerage System for increasing the strength or quantity of wastewater attributable to a particular parcel or operation already connected. This connection fee is -a capital facilities fee that is imposed in an amount sufficient to construct an incremental expansion of the Sewerage System to accommodate the proposed project. Payment of a connection fee will be required before a permit to connect to the sewer is DOC: 93015261.D15 Recyciec Paper Ms. Amy L. Harbin -2- June 24, 2014 issued. For more information and a copy of the Connection Fee Information Sheet, go to www.lacsd.org, Wastewater & Sewer Systems, click on Will Serve Program, and search for the appropriate link. For more specific information regarding the connection fee application procedure and fees, please contact the Connection Fee Counter at extension 2727. 5. In order for the Districts to conform to the requirements of the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA), the design capacities of the Districts' wastewater treatment facilities are based on the regional growth forecast adopted by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). Specific policies included in the development of the SCAG regional growth forecast are incorporated into clean air plans, which are prenare_,d by the_, Snuth Coast and Antelope Vallev Air C)llality Management Districts in order to improve air quality in the South Coast and Mojave Desert Air Basins as mandated by the CCA. All expansions of Districts' facilities must be sized and service phased in a manner that will be consistent with the SLAG regional growth forecast for the counties of Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino, Riverside, Ventura, and Imperial. The available capacity of the Districts' treatment facilities will, therefore, be limited to levels associated with the approved growth identified by SCAG. As such, this letter does not constitute a guarantee of wastewater service, but is to advise you that the Districts intend to provide this service up to the levels that are legally permitted and to inform you of the currently existing capacity and any proposed expansion of the Districts' facilities. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at (562) 908 -4288, extension 2717. Very truly yours, Grace Robinson Hyde Adriana Raza Customer Service Specialist Facilities Planning Department AR: ar DOC: 93015261.D15 ME I., _ i MO r � ♦ Ilp _� wo SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby find, determine and declare that: Resolution 2015-047 Page 2 a) An Initial -Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration • Environmental Impact were prepared for the Project in accordance with ihe provisions • the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines. b) The Initial Study and Negative Declaration were made available to the public for review and comment October 23, 2014 to November 12, 2014 as required by law. c) A properly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Baldwin Park on December 10, 2014, at which fima awirlanr-a Was heard nn the lnifiql Study ;::inrJ Mitigated Negative- Declaration. At the hearing, the Planning Commission fully reviewed and carefully considered that evidence, no additional comments were received at the hearing, and the Planning Commission recommended approval of the mitigated negative declaration for the Project. d) A properly noticed public hearing was held by the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park on January 21, 2015, at which time evidence was heard on the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration. At the hearing, the City Council fully reviewed and carefully considered them, together with any comments received during the public review period. SECTION 2. The City Council reviewed and considered 'Lille Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact and determined the Project will not have a significant impact on the environment. The Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact is therefore hereby approved. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution ?,nd forward a copy hereof to the Secretary of the Planning Commission. Resolution 2015-047 Page 3 ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SS CITY OF BALDWIN PARK I 1, ALEJANDRA AVILA, City Clerk, of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2015-047 was duly and regularly approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 21st day of January, 2015 by the following vote: F.ATAM*.]Illlllg 0 NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: FA r THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DOES HEREBY 0 RM Du A 11 MI A S F 0 L LO"VAVS: SECTION 1. That the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby find, determine and declare as follows: a) That the owner of certain real property filed an application for a zone change to add the Specific Plan (SP) Overlay to real property identified as Parcel 4 on Page 17 of Map Book 8552 in the Los Angeles County Assessor's Records (the "Property"), described more particularly in the said application which is on file in the office of the Planning Division of the City; and b) That -pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Planning and Zoning Law (Sections 65800 et seq. of the Government Code of the State of California), studies were commenced for the purposes of amending the Zoning Map of the City of Baldwin Park; and c) That a duly noticed public hearing was held upon said matter by the Planning Commission, and based upon the evidence presented, it was determined that Planning Commission it recommend approval of the reclassification of the Property to R-1 (SP); and SECTION 2. That the City Council • the City • Baldwin Park does hereby adopt the following Findings of Fact related to said Zone Change: a) The amendment is consistent with the goals, policies and objectives of the General Plan The zoning code map amendment would be consistent with the goals, Ordinance 1368 Paqe 2 policies and objectives of the General Plan in that it would effectively modify the zoning of a vacant lot to include its development as part of a comprehensive specific plan. Specifically, the zone change, which consists of adding the Center Specific Plan Overlay to an adjacent property, would satisfy Goal 3.0 of the Land Use Element which states that the City should provide for revitalization of deteriorating land uses and properties. The proposed zone change would also satisfy Goal 1 of the Housing Element which calls for the City to maintain and enhance the quality of existing residential housing and neighborhoods. b) The amendment will not adversely affect surrounding properties. The zoning code map amendment would place an abandoned and dilapidated property into a specific plan overlay district in order to redevelop the property as a part of a comprehensive plan for a fifty one (51) unit detached condominium development. The redevelopment of this property would enhance adjacent residential and commercial areas. c) The amendment promotes public health, safety and general welfare. The zoning code map amendment would promote the public health, safety and general welfare of adjacent development and the City as a VAlkr% le VVI I%dl because it would provide for the redevelopment of a property that is abandoned and dilapidated. The zone change would further the goal to improve the area with a detached condominium development that would enhance the areas and properties around the site, while continuing to provide cellular service to the community through the relocation of two (2) existing wireless carrier facilities on the same site. d) The amendment serves the goals and purposes of the zoning code. SECTION 3. The Zoning Classification of the Property is hereby reclassified from R-1 to zone R-1(SP). Ordinance 1368 Page 3 SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption • this Ordinance and shall cause a copy • the same to be published in a manner prescribed • law. q;l � '1 10-1 11 , , • 1 v Wxff� STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES s "T I %al I Y OF BALDWIN PARK 1, ALEJANDRA AVILA, City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance 1368 was regularly introduced for first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on January 21, 2015. That thereafter said Ordinance was duly approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on February 4, 2015 by the following vote: AYES: C 0 U NUC I LM E IV[ B F R -. M911MANIMMM M� II �i i mm !kESOLUTION 2015-048- THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY • BALDWIN PARK DOES HEREB7' RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby find, determine, and declare as follows: (,q) That applications ("Applications") for a Specific Plan Amendment (SP 14-01) and Tentative Tract Map (TM-72195) were submitted on behalf of the owner of certain real property, identified by Los Angeles County Assessor's Parcel Numbers: 8552-017-004, 8552 -017- 068, 069, 070, 071, 072, 073, 074, 075, 076, 077, and 078 , in the City of Baldwin Park, described more particularly in the Applications on file with the City Planner; and (b) The Applications are sought to allow the approval of: (1) an amendment to an existing Specific Plan (SP06-01) which will facilitate the development of a fifty-one unit single-family detached gated condominium project including the relocation of two wireless communications facilities and (2) a tentative tract map to consolidate twelve parcels or portions thereof into one lot of land for a fifty-one dwelling unit residential condominium subdivision and one lot for a wireless communications facility within the R-1, (Single-Family Residential) and MU-2 (Mixed Use 2) zones pursuant to Subchapter 153.210.660 and Table 152.10, respectively in the City's Municipal Code; and (c) That a duly noticed public hearing was held on said Applications by the City Council, and based upon evidence presented including applicable staff reports for the Specific Plan Amendment and Tentative Tract Map and each member of the City Council being familiar Resolution 2015-048 Page 2 with 'the properties, it was determined that the facts as required by the Baldwin Park Municipal Code for the granting • such Applications are present and that the City Council should approve the Specific Plan and the Tentative Tract Map; and SECTION 2. The City Council does hereby adopt the Findings of Fact applicable to Specific Plans: a) The specific plan is consistent with and provides for the orderly, systematic and specific implementation of the General Plan. The specif plan amendment is consistent with the rinolS, nnlides and objectives of the General Plan, in that it provides for the orderly development of a specific detached condominium housing development with up to a maximum of 511 detached dwelling units along with the relocation of two existing wireless communications facilities on the site to one mono-eucalyptus tree structure. The specific plan is located within an area that includes residential and commercial properties. The site is currently vacant (with the exception of the wireless communication facilities) and existing structures are in a state of disrepair. Goal 3.0 of the General Plan Land Use Element calls for the revitalization of deteriorating land uses and properties. Additionally, Policy 1.2 of the Housing Element encourages the rehabilitation and removal of substandard housing which would occur with development of the proposed specific plan amendment. 1- b) The land use and development regulations within the specific plan are comparable in breadth to regulations contained in this chapter. The development regulations outlined within the specific plan amendment are consistent with the purpose and intent of both the Single Family Residential (R-1) and Mixed Use 2 (11 Zones in that they allow for the development of a single family detached condominium project (including private yards, garages, and common amenities) that provides a traditional single-family detached housing community at higher density. The relocation and consolidation of two wireless communications facilities onto one stealth mono-eucalyptus structure maintains wireless service in a contained and aesthetically acceptable manner. All regulations outlined in the specific plan are consistently formatted with other existing zoning code regulations for ease of reference. c) The specific plan will not adversely affect the public heal 2nd safety • result in incompatible land uses; JL&r,'t'v;1*R4W&_9Ag4 A q Resolution 2015-048 Paae 3 and relocates existing wireless communications facilities to a single mono- eucalyptus structure. The specific plan amendment covers a 3.65 acre site that is located on a prominent intersection within the City. Currently the site contains several vacant dilapidated structures that are structurally unsound and an eyesore to the public, resulting in blight within the property and to those areas surrounding the site. Development of a new residential community, as proposed in the specific plan amendment, would enhance adjacent residents and commercial properties. Additionally, the relocation of two existing wireless communications facilities to a single mono-eucalyptus structure will provide the existing area with continued cellular service in an aesthetically appealing and stealth manner. d) The specific plan provides the framework to phase and pace growth within the specific plan area as to ensure completion of all necessary public facilities concurrently with completion of development entailed in the specific plan. The specific plan is not phased. It is anticipated that the developer, KILL Investment, LLC will construct the 51 unit single-family detached condominium project and mono-eucalyptus wireless facility in one phase. Development of the proposed project will comply with the development standards and design guidelines contained within the specific plan amendment. e) The specific plan identifies adequate financing mechanisms for the infrastructure and public facilities required to support the development. The Applicant shall be required to provide all infrastructure as required by the City and any outside utility companies to the project site as part of not only the Specific Plan, but also the tentative Tract Map (TM-72195). There are no financing mechanisms noted in the specific plan and financing of the infrastructure and the overall development will be completely borne by the Developer. Maintenance of all common areas and gated access will be the responsibility of the homeowners association, established through the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) for the project. SECTION 4. The City Council does hereby adopt the Findings of Fact applicable to Tentative Tract Maps: a) Adequate systems designed and constructed to provide all necessary utilities to each lot proposed to be created, including, but not limited to, facilities for water, natural gas, electricity, cable television and lelecommunications telephone services. Requests for comments/conditions • the proposed tract map were sent to outside entities as indicated in the staff report on June 5, 2014. Two agencies responded. Applicable utility agencies will be required to provide written notice that they will serve the subject development which, in turn, must be provided to the City as part of the plan check permitting process. Accordingly, the proposed project will have all necessary utilities. b) An adequate domestic water distribution system designe-4 and constructed to service each lot proposed to be created. The subject property is serviced by Valley County Water District. The to +k� n;+�, proposed project will be connected thrOughl new water service L LI IV.;e UI NIL-0. The Public Works Department has also indicated that each unit is required to have separate water service. As a result, the proposed units would be serviced by an adequate domestic water distribution system approved by the Fire Department. As conditioned, the proposed units would be serviced by an adequate domestic water distribution system. c) An adequate sewage system designed and constructed to serve each lot proposed to be created. Wastewater collection for the City is in the service area of the Los Angeles County Sanitation District No. 15. Wastewater is treated at the San Jose '%--,,,eek Water Reclamation Plant (SJCWRP) or at the joint Water Pollution Control Plant in Carson (JWPCP). SJCWRP provides primary, secondary and tertiary treatment for 100 million gallons of wastewater per day. JWPCP provides both primary and secondary treatment for approximately 280 million gallons of wastewater per day and has a total permitted capacity of 400 million gallons per day. Development of the Project would require development/connection fees that would mitigate impacts to wastewater treatment facilities. Because the Project is considered to be a relatively small development, the two wastewater facilities currently has capacity to serve the Project, and the City, SJCWRP and JWPCP would review the Project's development plans to determine a fair share fee contribution to mitigate any impacts. • An adequate storm water drainage system designed a �i constructed to serve each lot proposed to be created. Resolution 2015-048 Paae 5 e) An adequate public and/or private street and/or alley systerr designed and constructed to serve each lot proposed to be created. The City's Public Works Department has determined that there is an adequate public street system to serve the project. However, certain conditions of approval are required that relate to the public right-of-way and include construction of drive approaches which meet ADA requirements, ADA compliant wheel chair ramp, installation of street trees, and rep lacement/reconstructio n of any damaged public right-of-way or street improvements during the construction process in accordance with tL4-- , tariff k� ne City's, Current standa Irds. The internal roadway .11 we gated and privately owned and maintained by the homeowners association. f) An adequate traffic regulatory system, including necessary traffic signals, signs, pavement markings and stripings. The City's Public Works Department has concluded the current conditions provide for an adequate traffic regulatory system, however, specific improvements are required to the public right-of-way including street tree planting, new parkway irrigation and landscaping, ADA compliant wheel chair ramp, new drive approach construction and replacement/reconstruction of any damaged existing improvements as a result of the new construction. These requirements are outlined in through the Public Works Conditions of Approval. As such, the project will adequately mitigate any traffic impacts. g) The undergrounding of utilities pursuant to Chapter 97, part 2 (Underground Utility Districts) of the Municipal Code. Pursuant to Chapter 97, part 2 of the City's Municipal Code, the Applicant shall be required to underground the utilities. h) Any and all other improvements found necessary by the City to provide all services to each lot proposed to be created. Staff is of the opinion that, provided that the Applicant obtains approval by the City Council on the tract map and the related specific plan amendment and zone change request and meets and • exceeds the conditions • approval, the lot(s) would have adequate service and could be subdivided consistent with the City's codes. i) In addition to the improvements as required by the City's Municipal Code and Departments, there are also design requirements for the proposed tentative tract map that need to be met. Pursuant to Section 152.12 of the City's Municipal Code, the design of the subdivision shall Resolution 2015-048 Page 6 conform to the requirements of this Chapter 152, any and all design requirements set forth in the General Plan, the design and development standards established for the associated zoning district per the Zoning Code, the applicable design guidelines set forth in the Design Guidelines Manual, generally accepted engineering standards, and to such standards required • the City, including, but not limited to, plans for grading and erosion control. The Planning Division has reviewed the proposed subdivision in conjunction with the proposed specific plan amendment and the proposed lots each meet the minimum development standards contained within the /7r%ningN Code, inr,1iir4inr-i, Minimum Inf Ci-70. lot depth, and Intl width, in addition to those conditions and development standards contained in the specific plan amendment. As a condition of approval, any existing structures located on the property shall be demolished or brought into conformance with the current Zoning Code and/or adopted specific plan amendment standards prior to the tract map being finalized. Additionally the tentative tract map is consistent with Goal 2.0 of the Land Use Element of the General Plan which states "accommodate new development that is compatible with and compliments existing conforming land uses" as the proposed lots meet the existing development standards contained in the Code. Any future development on the subject properties will be subject to the Specific Plan Amendment SP 14-01, provided it is adopted by the City Council, otherwise, any future development will be subject to the current density for the respective zoning designation, development standards, design guidelines, and processes at the time of submittal. The Public Works Department, as part of their comments, has included a requirement for the Applicant to submit plans relating to grading and erosion control for review and approval. SECTION 5. The City Council does hereby adopt the Conditions of approval applicable to Tentative Tract Maps: Resolution 2015-048 Paae 7 c) Should any existing trees on- the property that are designated as a Mature Tree in accordance with the City's Tree Ordinance be removed, a tree removal application shall be submitted to the City's Tree Department (Planning Division) for review and approval prior to any said removal; and d) Any proposed structures shall be developed in compliance with the current development standards and design guidelines contained within the adopted Specific Plan 14-01; and e) Applicant shall be subject to any and all Los Angeles County r'linrk- Pnctinn Fees for the Notice of Determinntinn including but not limited to the California Department of Fish and Game Fees; and P) Applicant shall finalize the Lot Line Adjustment d currently In process with the City of Baldwin Park, prior to the City Council public hearing on this item in January 2015; and g) Any and all landscaping (including trees surrounding the wireless communications facility) shall be developed in compliance with the current development standards and design guidelines contained within the adopted Specific Plan 14-01; and h) Final landscaping and irrigation plans shall be prepared pursuant to Subchapter 153.160 of the City's Municipal Code. All landscaping and irrigation plans shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Division; and i) The tract map and proposed development may be subject to the following Development Impact Fees, as required: Public Art Flood Control Traffic Impact Parkland In-Lieu j) The Applicant shall comply with all comments and conditions of approval as determined by the City's Public Works Department as shown on Attachment #7; and k) The Applicant shall comply with all comments and conditions of approval as determined by the Los Angeles County Fire Department shown • Attachment #8; and 1) The Applicant shall comply with all comments and conditions of approval as determined by the Los Angeles County Sanitation District shown on Attachment #9; and Resolution 2015-048 Paae 8 m) In accordance with the requirements of the Public Works Department, the Applicant shall provide separate and independent water and sanitary sewer service to each property; and n) Utilities shall be undergrounded, pursuant to Chapter 97, Part 1 • the City's Municipal Code; and o) The Applicant shall provide additional screening in the form of landscaping (i.e. trees) within the rear yards of those properties within the project that are adjacent to the Kenmore Avenue Single-Family RA_qirJt=nr- q to reduce the vi.qiml impact of the nrnip(-t This screenina idenc es - F-,-J---" - -- -1 shall be maintained by said project property owners, and enforced by the projects Homeowner's Association. Such language regarding the landscaping and on-going maintenance shall be included within the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's); and p) The Applicant shall install or cause to be installed individual, independent service to each separate property for any and all utility companies that provide service to said properties, including but not limited to Valley County Water District, Southern California Edison, The Gas Company, Verizon Telephone, and Time Warner Cable; and a) The Final Map shall comply with the time frames as contained within the California Subdivision Map /'Act-, and r) The Applicant shall sign and have notarized an affidavit within ten (10) days of the date of this resolution, stating that the applicant has read and accepts all of the conditions of approval. SECTION 6. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and forward a copy hereof to the City Planner and the Applicant. MANUELLOZANO MAYOR Resolution 2015-048 Pooeg AT-[EST: 1, ALEJANDRA AVILA, City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution 2015-048 was duly and regularly approved and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 21st day of January, 2015 by the following vote: STAFF REPORT— I ITEM NO. TO: The Honorable Chair and Board Members of the Successor Agency to the Dissolved Community Development Commission of the City of B#Idwin FROM: Craig A. Graves, Director of Finance Marc Castagnola, Director of Community 0 IA41 V "PV DATE: .January 221, 2015 t' I//- SUBJECT: CONFIRM THE RECEIPT BY THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF $3,473,836 FROM THE CITY ASSOCIATED WITH REVERSAL OF REPAYMENTS OF A CITY LOAN IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE STATE CONTROLLER'S OFFICE REPORT AND REQUEST THE OVERSIGHT BOARD APPROVE THE REPAYMENT OF THE CITY LOAN ON ROPS 15/16A Recently the State Controller's Office completed the Asset Transfer Review of the Baldwin Park Community Development Commission for the period of January 1, 2011 through January 31, 2012 and issued its Report to the City on November 26, 2014. It is a standard review that the State Controller's Office is conducting of all Redevelopment Agencies (Community Development Commissions) statewide in compliance with Health and Safety Code Section 34167.5. During the review the State Controller's Office determined that the partial repayment of loans paid on January 25, 2011 by Community Development Commission to the City should not have been made at that aarticular time and that the repavments of the loan should occur as part of the ROPS process subject to the Oversight Board's approval. To address the State Controller's Office determination with regards to the repayment of the loan, the City is returning $3,473,836 which represents the amount the State Controller has order be returned to the Successor Agency. The return of the funds from the City to the Successor Agency results in an equivalent adjustment in the amount owed to the City by the Successor Agency under the original loan agreement bringing the total outstanding loan amount to $21,901,790. In order for the Successor Agency to collect Real Property Tax Trust Fund revenues and eventually repay the City Loan, the Successor Agency needs approval of the Oversight Board to include the returned loan repayments on the next Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule ( the Staff Report Confirming the Receipt of $3,473,836 to the Successor Agency From the City Reversing the Repayment of a City Loan in compliance with State Controller's Office Asset Transfer Review Report and request Approval Of the Oversight Board to include Reversed Loan Repayments in the Next RODS "BOPS "). The next BOPS will be presented to the Successor Agency at its February 18, 2015 meeting, then approved by the Oversight Board and submitted to the State Department of Finance the first week in March. While the State Controller's Office has determined the City can still collect the loan amount from the Successor Agency, the loan repayment must still be approved by the Oversight Board and repayments must be included in the bi- annual ROPS process approved by the Oversight Board and the Department of Finance. FISCAL IMPACT The return of the loan repayment will increase cash balance of the Successor Agency by $3,487,836 and result in an equivalent increase in the outstanding amount due under the City Loan Agreement. Assuming the Oversight Board approves the inclusion of the City Loan Repayment on the ROPS, the City will eventually receive the funds through the ROPS process, but it will be over an extended period of time. RECOMMENDATION 1. That the Board of the Successor Agency confirm the receipt of $3,473,836 that was originally paid to the City in repayment of various loans for administrative costs incurred by the Community Development Commission. 2. That the Successor Agency's outstanding obligation under the City Loan Agreement reflect an adjustment of $3,473,836 such that the total outstanding obligation on the City Loan be equal to $21,901,790 3. The Successor Agency requests that the Oversight Board approve including the reversed repayment of the City Loan in the Successor Agency's next BOPS. 4. That the City's Director of Finance be authorized to make all necessary budget amendments, changes in loan balances and transfers ALTERNATIVES There are no other viable alternatives as the City has been directed to return the funds to the Successor Agency. LEGAL REVIEW This recommended action has been reviewed by both the City Attorney and Special Counsel. Staff Report Confirming the Receipt of $3,473,836 to the Successor Agency From the City Reversing the Repayment of a City Loan in compliance with State Controller's Office Asset Transfer Review Report and request Approval Of the Oversight Board to include Reversed Loan Repayments in the Next RODS On January 1, 2011 the Governor introduced legislation that would dissolve and eliminate local Redevelopment Agencies. Most cities in California took actions to protect various City loans and assets of both the City and their Redevelopment Agency. The City of Baldwin Park and its Community Development Commission passed several actions on January 25, 2011 that involved the purchase of property with low /mod housing funds and the partial payment of loans that were made to the Community Development Commission to cover administrative costs that had not been covered by current tax increment. The City received the Successor Agency's Finding of Completion on April 26, 2013 and on August 29, 2013 a final determination on the Housing Asset Transfer Plan. During August of 2014, the State Controller's Office conducted its Asset Transfer Review for the period of January 1, 2011 through January 31, 2012. Their initial review disallowed $8,483,156 of asset transfers. However, the City (as the Successor Agency) supplied additional information that clearly showed that $5,009,320 of funds were used to purchase property and that this property was included in the Housing Asset Transfer List that had been previously approved. The Successor agency in September amended its Long Range Property Management Plan ( LRPMP) to remove those properties purchased with Low/Mod Housing Funds from the Plan as they were already part of the Housing Asset Transfer List. The City and Successor Agency are awaiting final approval of the LRPMP from the State Department of Finance. With that additional information, the State Controller's Office determined that only the $3,473,836 loan repayment was not an allowable cost to be paid back in one lump sum during that time period and that those funds should be returned to the Successor Agency and that the $3,473,836 should be paid back through the regular BOPS process and the Oversight Board allowed under Health and Safety Code Section 34191.4. The recommended action would confirm the receipt of funds that allows the City comply with the State Controller's order to return $3,473,836 in loan repayment funds to the Successor Agency and would adjust the outstanding loan amount under the City Loan Agreement. The Successor Agency would then request the Oversight Board allow the returned loan repayment to be added to the RODS and authorize the entire outstanding obligation be paid back through the ROPS process which would eventually allow the Successor Agency to payback the City. A L614FAIII NM JANUARY 21, 2015 7:00 PM REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBER 14403 E. PACIFIC BALDWIN PARK, a • f:•. t '626) 9060-4011 o i- r��r�ca Manuel Lozano Ricardo Pacheco Cruz Baca - Chair - Vice Chair - Board Member Monica Garcia - Board Member Susan Rubio - Board Member PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES AND PAGERS WHILE MEETING IS IN PROCESS POR FAVOR DE APAGAR SUS TELEFONOS CEL ULARES Y BEEPERS OURANTE LA JUNTA PUBLIC COMMENTS COMENTARIOS DEL PUBLICO The public is encouraged to address the Finance Se invita al pGblico a dirigirse a la Agencia nombrada en esta Authority on any matter posted on the agenda or on any agenda, para hablar sobre cualquier asunto publicado en la other matter within its jurisdiction. If you wish to address agenda o cualquier tema que este bajo su jurisdiccion. Si usted the Board, you may do so during the PUBLIC desea la oportunidad de dirigirse a la Agencia, podra hacerlo COMMUNICATIONS period noted on the agenda. Each durante el periodo de Comentarios del Publico (Public person is allowed three (3) minutes speaking time. A Communications) anunciado en la agenda. A cada persona se Spanish speaking interpreter is available for your le permite hablar por tres (3) minutos. Hay un interprete para convenience. su conveniencia. Any written public record relating to an agenda item for an open session of a regular meeting of the Finance Authority that is distributed to the Housing Authority less than 72 hours prior to that meeting will be available for public inspection at City Hall in the City Clerk's office at 14403 E. Pacific Avenue, 3rd Floor during normal business hours (Monday - Thursday, 7.30 a.m. - 6:00 p.m.) FINANCE AUTHORITY REGULAR MEETING — 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL Board Members: Cruz Baca, Monica Garcia, Susan Rubio, Vice Chair Ricardo Pacheco and Chair Manuel Lozano PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Three (3) minute speaking time limit Tres (3) minutos sera el limite para hablar THIS IS THE TIME SET ASIDE TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION No action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances exist. The legislative body or its staff may: 1) Briefly respond to statements made or questions asked by persons; or 2) Direct staff to investigate andlor schedule matters for consideration at a future meeting. (Government Code §54954.21 ESTE ES EL PERIODO DESIGNADO PARA DIRIGIRSE AL COMIS16N No se podra tomar acci6n en alg(in asunto a menos que sea incluido en la agenda, o a menos que exista alg(lna emergencia o circunstancia especial. El cuerpo legislativo y su personal podran: 1) Responder brevemente a declaraciones o preguntas hechas por personas; o 2) Dirigir personal a investigar ylo fijar asuntos Para tomar en consideracion en juntas proximas. [Codigo de Gobierno §54954.2] CONSENT CALENDAR 1. TREASURER'S REPORT — NOVEMBER 2014 Staff recommends that Council receive and file the Treasurer's Report for the month of November 2014. ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATION I, Alejandra Avila, Secretary of the Finance Authority hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing agenda was posted on the City Hall bulletin board not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting. Dated this 15" day of January, 2015. Alejandra Avila Secretary PLEASE NOTE: Copies of staff reports and supporting documentation pertaining to each item on this agenda are available for public viewing and inspection at City Hall, 2 Floor Lobby Area or at the Los Angeles County Public Library in the City of Baldwin Park. For further information regarding agenda items, please contact the office of the City Clerk at (626) 813 -5204 or via e -mail at rcaballero(a)baldwinpark.com. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the Public Works Department or Risk Management at (626) 960 -4011. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable staff to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. (28 CFR 34.102.104 ADA TITLE ll) STAFF 'T Q'A 4 'T ®: HUB 4F THE �� FROM: ® SAN GAMEL b C, VALLEY DATE: �Qh R.., TEDJAN SU�j E CT: SUMMARY kY Tx 4 Attached is the Treasurer's Report for the month of November 2014. The Treasurer's Report lists all cash for the City (which includes the Baldwin Park Financing Authority), the Housing Authority, and the Successor Agency to the Community Development Commission (CDC). All investments are in compliance with the City's Investment Policy and the California Government Code. None That the City Council receive and file the Treasurer's Report for November 2014 None. The City's Investment Policy requires the Treasurer's Report be submitted to the Mayor and City Council on a monthly basis. None Required Treasurer's Report for November 2014 Page 2 ;! 7 , 1 '13 Attached is the Treasurer's Report for the month of November 2014. The Treasurer's Report lists all cash for the City (which includes the Baldwin Park Financing Authority), the Housing Authority, and the Successor Agency to the Community Development Commission (CDC), The^ repo it separates cash into the following three sections • State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) —this is where the majority of the cash is held. City cash, which accounts for the largest portion includes monies from the General Fund and all other restricted funds known as Special Funds. Money is kept in LAIF until it needs to be transferred to cover warrants (payments to vendors, contractors, etc.), payroll, or to pay the various bond payments. • Fiscal Agent Funds — These amounts represent monies held by the various bond holders that are restricted and which have been set aside for future bond payments. • Cash — This section provides the cash balances in the various checking accounts the City uses to pay its on -going payments. The cash balances fluctuate during the year due to the timing of 'large payments, such as interest and principal for bonds, and due to when the City receives its major sources of revenues (such as sales tax and property tax in December, January and May each year. The current investments are in compliance with the City's Investment Policy and to the California Government Code. Attachment: Treasurer's Report for November 2014 CITY OF BALDWIN PARK TREASURER'S REPORT 11/30/2014 ESTIMATE INVESTMENT INTEREST PURCHASE MATURITY PAR CURRENT BOOK MARKET DESCRIPTION RATE DATE DATE VALUE PRINCIPAL VALUE VALUE State of California Local Agency Investment Fund City 0.26% Varies Housing Authority 0.26 % Varies Fiscal Agent Funds - City Varies Varies Fiscal Agent Funds - Successo Varies Varies Varies 25,092,947.62 25,092,947.62 25,092,947.62 25,092,947.62 Varies 28,028.78 28,028.78 28,028.78 28,028.78 25,120,976.40 25,120,976.40 25,120,976.40 25,120,976.40 Varies 852,773.71 852,773.71 852,773.71 852,773.71 Varies 2,937,916.83 2,937,916.83 2,937,916.83 2,937,916.83 $ 28,911,666.94 $ 28,911,666.94 3,790,650.54 $ 28,911,666.94 Total Investments $ 28,9115666.94 Cash City Checking 6,991,241.94 City Miscellaneous Cash 65,571.81 Comm. Develop. Comm. 0.00 Successor Agency 1,129,388.37 Housing Authority 403,330.14 Financing Authority 0.00 Total Cash 8,589,532.26 Total Cash and Investments $ 37,501,199.20 Schedule of Cash and Investments includes all financial assets as included in the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. There was no investment maturity /purchase transaction made for the month of November 2014 and several deposits /withdrawals were made with the Local Agency Investment Fund. In compliance with the California Government Code Section 53646 et seq., I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the City's expenditure requirements for the next six months that all investments are in compliance to the City's Statement of investment Policy. Approved by: Craig A. Finance A I 1 ' A e JANUARY 21, 2015 7:00 PM s 1 1 BIA"'Ll-DwIll-ri Manuel Lozano Ricardo Pacheco Cruz Baca Monica Garcia Susan Rubio - Chair - Vice Chair - Board Member - Board Member - Board Member PLEASE TURNOFF CELL PHONES AND PAGERS WHILE MEETING IS IN PROCESS POR FAVOR DE APAGAR SUS TELEFONOS CEL ULARES Y BEEPERS DURANTE LA JUNTA PUBLIC COMMENTS The public is encouraged to address the Housing Authority on any matter posted on the agenda or on any other matter within its jurisdiction. If you wish to address the Board, you may do so during the PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS period noted on the agenda. Each person is allowed three (3) minutes speaking time. A Spanish speaking interpreter is available for your convenience. COMENTARIOS DEL PUBLICO Se invita al pOblico a dirigirse a la Agencia nombrada en esta agenda, para hablar sobre cualquier asunto publicado en la agenda o cualquier tema que este bajo su jurisdiccidn. Si usted desea la oportunidad de dirigirse a la Agencia, podra hacerlo durante el periodo de Comentarios del Publico (Public Communications) anunciado en la agenda. A cada persona se le permite hablar por tres (3) minutos. Hay un interprete para su conveniencia. il�,Tn fo tide 2. # f `�+guh'.. -FV Fw d Ca " r #" � ?; t r u3s �,WBf J .., p, f 3�v ;� ( b'N "'3:a?i 7 7001., i�i"ro "o dfia ?�l ii. !'t; V # v,J �i:��.;;�ri!a a',Ve b� ch _Il rrmi,_bY.�, ,. ,,.. ka3'r:,. U ad. , ,._. �` ° $Pr a' `ass " . f'lac""fic: 3rd Roo (,I ue�inm„ bofsiner,,'w HOUSING AUTHORITY REGULAR MEETING — 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL Board Members: Cruz Baca, Monica Garcia, Susan Rubio, Vice Chair Ricardo Pacheco and Chair Manuel Lozano PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Three (3) minute speaking time limit Tres (3) minutos sera el limite para hablar THIS IS THE TIME SET ASIDE TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION No action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances exist. The legislative body or its stair may: 1) Briefly respond to statements made or questions asked by persons; or 2) Direct staff to investigate and /or schedule matters for consideration at a future meeting. [Government Code §54954.2] ESTE ES EL PERIODO DESIGNADO PARA DIRIGIRSE AL COMIS16N No se podra tomar acci6n en algun asunto a menos que sea incluido en la agenda, o a menos que exista alguna emergencia o circunstancia especial. El cuerpo legislativo y su personal podran: 1) Responder brevemente a declaraci6nes o preguntas hechas por personas; o 2) Dirigir personal a investigar y/o fijar asuntos para tomar en consideraci6n en juntas proximas. (Codigo de Gobierno §54954.21 CONSENT CALENDAR 1. TREASURER'S REPORT — NOVEMBER 2014 Staff recommends that Council receive and file the Treasurer's Report for the month of November 2014. ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATION I, Alejandra Avila, Secretary of the Housing Authority hereby certify that, under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, the foregoing agenda was posted on the City Hall bulletin board not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting. Dated this 15th day of January 2015. Alejandra Avila Secretary PLEASE NOTE: Copies of staff reports and supporting documentation pertaining to each item on this agenda are available for public viewing and inspection at City Hall, 2 "d Floor Lobby Area or at the Los Angeles County Public Library in the City of Baldwin Park. For further information regarding agenda items, please contact the office of the City Clerk at (626) 813 -5204 or via e -mail at rcaballero(a)baldwinpark.com . In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the Public Works Department or Risk Management at (626) 960 -4011. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable staff to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. (28 CFR 34.102.104 ADA TITLE II) OMM ��. SU MAR Y Attached is the Treasurer's Report for the month of November 2014. The Treasurer's Report lists all cash for the City (which includes the Baldwin Park Financing Authority), the Housing Authority, and the Successor Agency to the Community Development Commission (CDC). All investments are in compliance with the City's Investment Policy and the California Government Code. None M 011M That the City Council receive and file the Treasurer's Report for November 2014 None. The City's Investment Policy requires the Treasurer's Report be submitted to the Mayor and City Council on a monthly basis. None Required TO: HUBQF A THE �� FROM: 'T (,-,SAtN GABRIEL DATE: ALLEY 21 SUBJECT: SU MAR Y Attached is the Treasurer's Report for the month of November 2014. The Treasurer's Report lists all cash for the City (which includes the Baldwin Park Financing Authority), the Housing Authority, and the Successor Agency to the Community Development Commission (CDC). All investments are in compliance with the City's Investment Policy and the California Government Code. None M 011M That the City Council receive and file the Treasurer's Report for November 2014 None. The City's Investment Policy requires the Treasurer's Report be submitted to the Mayor and City Council on a monthly basis. None Required Treasurer's Report for November 2014 Page 2 Attached is the Treasurer's Report for the month of November 2014. The Treasurer's Report lists all cash for the City (which includes the Baldwin Park Financing Authority), the Housing Authority, and the Successor Agency to the Community Development Commission (CDC). The report separates cash into the following three seed.^ns: • State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) —this is where the majority of the cash is held. City cash, which accounts for the largest portion includes monies from the General Fund and all other restricted funds known as Special Funds. Money is kept in LAIF until it needs to be transferred to cover warrants (payments to vendors, contractors, etc.), payroll, or to pay the various bond payments. • Fiscal Agent Funds — These amounts represent monies held by the various bond holders that are restricted and which have been set aside for future bond payments. • Cash — This section provides the cash balances in the various checking accounts the City uses to pay its on -going payments. The cash balances fluctuate during the year due to the timing of large payments, such as interest and principal for bonds, and due to when the City receives its major sources of revenues (such as sales tax and property tax in December, January and May each year. The current investments are in compliance with the City's Investment Policy and to the California Government Code. Attachment: Treasurer's Report for November 2014 CITY OF BALDWIN PARK TREASURER'S REPORT 11/30/2014 ESTIMATED INVESTMENT INTEREST PURCHASE MATURITY PAR CURRENT BOOK MARKET DESCRIPTION RATE DATE DATE VALUE PRINCIPAL VALUE VALUE State of California Local 25,092,947.62 25,092,947.62 Agency Investment Fund 25,092,947.62 Varies City 0.26 % Varies Housing Authority 0.26% Varies Fiscal Agent Funds - City Varies Varies Fiscal Agent Funds - Successo Varies Varies Varies 25,092,947.62 25,092,947.62 25,092,947.62 25,092,947.62 Varies 28,025.78 28,028.78 28,028.78 28,028.78 25,120,976.40 25,120,976.40 25,120,976.40 25,120,976.40 Varies 852,773.71 852,773.71 852,773.71 852,773.71 Varies 2,937,916.83 2,937,916.83 2,937,916.83 2,937,916.83 $ 28,911,666.94 $ 28,911,666.94 3,790,690.54 $ 28,911,666.94 Total Investments $ 28;911,66694 Cash City Checking 6,991,241.94 City Miscellaneous Cash 65,571.81 Comm. Develop. Comm. 0.00 Successor Agency 1,129,388.37 Housing Authority 403,330.14 Financing Authority 0.00 Total Cash 8,589,532.26 Total Cash and Investments $ 37,501,199.20 Schedule of Cash and Investments includes all financial assets as included in the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. There was no investment maturity /purchase transaction made for the month of November 2014 and several deposits /withdrawals were made with the Local Agency Investment Fund. In compliance with the California Government Code Section 53646 et seq., I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the City's expenditure requirements for the next six months that all investments are in compliance to the City's Statement of Investment Policy. Approved by: Craig A. Finance