HomeMy WebLinkAboutORD 1212ORD 1212 pT3 (Ìì . £ ORDINANCE NO. 1212
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BALDWIN PARK APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER
153 OF THE CITY'S MUNICIPAL CODE ADDING SECTION
153.112 RELATING TO THE REGULATION OF WIRELESS
COMMUNICAITON FACILITIES, WHICH WILL INCLUDE BUT
ARE NOT LIMITED TO ADDING DEFINITIONS PERTAINING TO
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES, LOCATION
CRITERIA, DESIGN STANDARDS, REGULATIONS AND
APPLICATION PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
PLACEMENT OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES
APPLICANT: CITY OF BALDWIN PARK; CASE NO. AZC-149)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby find, determines
and declares as follows:
WHEREAS, the City of Baldwin Park hereinafter Applicant") heretofore
filed an application Application") requesting approval of an amendment to the
municipal code Sections 153.090 Commercial and Industrial Zones) relating to
the regulation of wireless communication facilities which will include but are not
limited to adding definitions pertaining to wireless communication facilities,
location criteria, design standards, regulations and application procedures and
requirements for the placement of wireless communication facilities; and
WHEREAS, on August 20, 2003, the City Council conducted a duly
noticed public hearing upon said application; and
WHEREAS, in recent years there has been a growing proliferation of
wireless telecommunication facilities being erected within the commercial and
industrial zones throughout the City of Baldwin Park; and
WHEREAS, wireless telecommunication facilities can detract from the
overall quality and appearance of the City's commercial and industrial
neighborhoods and the City is desirous to establish regulations to control these
impacts; and
WHEREAS, the proposed changes provide for the protection of health,
safety, and welfare of the residents of Baldwin Park; and
WHEREAS, the permit requirements and restrictions imposed by these
regulations are reasonably necessary to protect the health, safety, and welfare
of the citizens of the City; and
BIB]
37874-U01
ORD-U02
1212-U02
LI2-U03
FO8535-U03
FO9348-U03
DO23861-U03
C5-U03
ORDINANCES-U03
9/9/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04
ORD 1212 pT3 (Ìì . £ Ordinance 1212
Page 2
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission upon giving the required notice
did conduct a duly noticed public hearing on July 23, 2003 as prescribed by law,
at which time the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC 03-24,
recommending that the City Council approve the Negative Declaration of
Environmental Impact and the amendment to the City Municipal Code AZC-
149); and
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a duly noticed hearing upon said
matter, and based upon the evidence presented, it was determined that the
public interest, necessity, convenience and general welfare require the approval
of the amendments to the Municipal Code.
SECTION 2. That Chapter 153 entitled Zoning Code, is hereby amended to apply
Section 153.112 to Part I, General Provisions of the Commercial and Industrial Zones to read
as follows:
153.112 WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES
This Chapter is enacted pursuant to 47 U.S.C. 332(c)(7) to provide
standards for wireless communication facilities. It is intended that such
facilities be located, installed and operated in a manner consistent with all of
the articulated health, safety and aesthetic objectives of this chapter, while
recognizing the benefits of these facilities to the community. This chapter
applies to all wireless service facilities located within the City of Baldwin
Park, whether they are located on private property or public property,
including the public right-of-way.
A) Definitions. For the purpose of this Section, the following definitions
shall apply unless the context clearly indicates or requires a different
meaning.
Antenna" means any system of wires, poles, rods, reflecting discs, dishes,
whips or other similar devices used for the transmission or reception of
electromagnetic waves.
Antenna Height" means the distance from the grade of the property at the
base of the antenna or, in the case of a roof mounted antenna, from the
grade at the exterior base of the building to the highest point of the antenna
and its associated support structure when fully extended.
Antenna Structure" means an antenna or array of antennas and its
associated support structure, including, without limitation, a mast or tower.
Base Station or Equipment Shelter" means a fixed station at a specified
site authorized to communicate with mobile stations, micro cells, repeaters
or other wireless stations, usually housed in metal cabinets or small
structures on or within close proximity to the antenna structure on the same
site.
BIB]
37874-U01
ORD-U02
1212-U02
LI2-U03
FO8535-U03
FO9348-U03
DO23861-U03
C5-U03
ORDINANCES-U03
9/9/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04
ORD 1212 pT3 (Ìì . £ Ordinance 1212
Page3
City" shall mean the City of Baldwin Park
Director of Public Works" means the duly appointed and acting Director
of Public Works of the City.
Erect" shall mean to build, construct, attach, hang, place, suspend, paint
or affix.
Public right-of-way" means that portion of the street, sidewalk and/or
parkway that is owned by the City.
Screening" means the effect of locating an antenna behind a building,
wall, facade, fence, landscaping, berm and/or other specially designed
device so that view of the antenna from adjoining and nearby public street
right-of-way and private properties is eliminated or minimized.
Unlicensed Wireless Service" means the offering of telecommunication
services, using duly authorized devices which do not require individual
licenses, but does not mean the provision of direct-to-home satellite
services, as defined in 47 U.S.C. 332(c)(7).
Wireless Communication Services" means commercial mobile services,
unlicensed wireless services and common carrier wireless exchange access
services, as defined in 47 U.S.C. 332(c)(7).
Wireless Communication Facilities" means facilities for the provision of
wireless communication services, as defined in 47 U.S.C. 332(c)(7).
B) Application
1. Prior to the installation of a Wireless Communication Facility on
private property, including the property of the City of Baldwin Park which
is not located within the public right-of-way, the owner and/or occupant
with written permission from the owner, of the lot, premises, parcel of
land, building or structure on which a wireless facility is to be located,
shall first make application for Design Review and obtain approval from
the Design Review Committee, pursuant to Section 153.656 of this
Code. Once approved, the applicant shall obtain approval of a
conditional use permit CUP) from the City pursuant to Section 153.630,
et seq. of this Code.
2. Prior to the Installation of a Wireless Communication Facility on
property within the public right-of-way, the applicant shall first obtain a
Wireless Facility Encroachment Permit from the Public Works Director.
At least fifteen 15) days prior to issuing the permit, written notice of the
application shall be sent to all property owners within a three hundred
foot 300') radius of the proposed facility. In issuing the permit, the
Public Works Director shall take into consideration all comments
BIB]
37874-U01
ORD-U02
1212-U02
LI2-U03
FO8535-U03
FO9348-U03
DO23861-U03
C5-U03
ORDINANCES-U03
9/9/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04
ORD 1212 pT3 (Ìì . £ Ordinance 1212
Page 4
provided by the public, and may impose conditions on the permit prior to
its issuance relating to the time, place and manner of the use of the
public property. The Public Works Director may deny the Wireless
Facility Permit if the application is incomplete or does not adequately
mitigate the Facility's adverse impact on the health, safety or welfare of
the community, including, but limited to, adverse aesthetic impacts
arising from the proposed time, place and manner of use of the public
property. Within fifteen 15) days after the determination by the Director
to issue or deny the Permit, any person may appeal the decision to the
Planning Commission. Should an appeal be made, issuance of the
permit shall be stayed. If no appeal is made within the fifteen 15) day
period, the permit shall be issued. The Public Works Director may, in his
or her discretion, refer any application to the Planning Commission for a
decision on the issuance of a permit. The hearing on the appeal or the
referral to the Planning Commission shall be held following at least
fifteen 15) days notice to the applicant and all property owners within a
three hundred foot 300') radius of the proposed facility. The decision of
the Planning Commission shall be based on the same standards as
applicable to the Public Works Director.
3. All applications for a permit for the installation of a wireless
communication facility, whether on public or private property, shall make
application for Design Review and contain the following information:
a) A legal description of the property where the Wireless
Communication Facility is to be installed.
b) A radius map and a certified list of the names and addresses
of all property owners within three hundred feet 300') of the
exterior boundaries of the property involved, as shown on
latest assessment role of the County Assessor.
c) A plot plan of the lot, premises or parcel of land, showing the
exact location of the proposed Wireless Communication
Facility including all related equipment and cables), exact
location and dimensions of all buildings, parking lots,
walkways, trash enclosures and property lines.
d) Building elevations and roof plan for building and/or roof top
mounted facilities) indicating exact location and dimensions of
equipment proposed. For freestanding facilities, indicate
surrounding grades, structures and landscaping from all
sides.
e) Proposed landscaping and/or non-vegetative screening
including required safety fencing) plan form all aspects of the
Wireless Communication Facility.
BIB]
37874-U01
ORD-U02
1212-U02
LI2-U03
FO8535-U03
FO9348-U03
DO23861-U03
C5-U03
ORDINANCES-U03
9/9/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04
ORD 1212 pT3 (Ìì . £ Ordinance 1212
Page 5
f) Manufacturer's specifications, including installation
specifications, exact location of cables, wiring, materials, color
and any support devices that may be required.
g) A silhouette, mock-up or elevation including all proposed
antenna structures, antennas, and any related accessory
equipment constructed prior to notice being given to the
public, in order for the Planning Commission or the Public
Works Director to assess aesthetic impacts to surrounding
land uses and public rights-of-way. The Public Works
Director may waive this requirement.
h) Certified documentation by a licensed engineer demonstrating
that any proposed Wireless Communication Facility will
comply with the most current allowable radiation standards as
allowed by the Federal Communications Commission for non-
ionizing electromagnetic radiation NIER) and electromagnetic
fields EMF). In the event that the certified documentation
cannot be submitted, the City may hire a consultant to
evaluate the potential NIER or EMF of the proposed Facility.
The applicant shall pay the fee charged by the consultant.
i) Identification of materials contained within the Facility, which
are potentially harmful to persons, animals, or vegetation, and
a description of the methods of protection from harm.
j) Any other information as deemed necessary by the City in
order to consider an application for a Wireless
Communication Facility.
k) The application shall be accompanied by the appropriate fee
as set forth by Resolution of the City Council.
C) Design Standards. The following general design guidelines shall be
considered for regulating the location, design and aesthetics for a Wireless
Communication Facility:
1. Site Selection Criteria.
a) Wireless Communication Facilities in the form of antennas
which are mounted on, and blended into the architecture of a
building and substantially hidden from view of the public right-
of-way, may be installed on all Neighborhood Commercial C-
1) zoned properties, subject to the approval by the Design
Review Committee and the Planning Commission.
BIB]
37874-U01
ORD-U02
1212-U02
LI2-U03
FO8535-U03
FO9348-U03
DO23861-U03
C5-U03
ORDINANCES-U03
9/9/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04
ORD 1212 pT3 (Ìì . £ Ordinance 1212
Page 6
b) All other forms of wireless facilities may be permitted/installed
in the General Commercial C-2), Commercial Manufacturing
CM), Industrial I), Industrial Commercial 1C), Freeway
Commercial FC), Office Industrial 01), Public Facilities, and
Open Space OS) zones, subject to approval by the Design
Review Committee and the Planning Commission.
c) All proposed Wireless Communication Facilities within
Redevelopment Project Areas must receive conceptual
approval by the Redevelopment Agency as a prerequisite to
the issuance of building permits.
d) If feasible, Wireless Communication Facilities should be
located or co-located at the same site as existing wireless
facilities unless the new Facility would interfere with the
operation of such existing facilities, is aesthetically
incompatible with them, or would be otherwise detrimental to
the community.
e) All Wireless Communication Facilities including all related
accessory cabinet(s)) shall meet the height and setback
requirements of the underlying zone. In no case shall any
portion of a Facility be located in a defined front yard or side
yard. The Design Review Committee or Planning
Commission may require additional setbacks and/or restricted
location areas than that specified for the underlying zone
based on the existing development of the site and/or
surrounding land uses.
f) Any freestanding ground-mounted Wireless Communication
Facility, including any related accessory cabinet(s) shall apply
toward the allowable lot coverage for the structures/buildings
of the underlying zone. In no case shall any part of a Facility
alter vehicular circulation within a site or impede access to
and from a site. In no case shall a facility alter of-street
parking spaces such that the required number of parking
spaces for a use are decreased) or interfere with the normal
operation of the existing use of the site.
2. Visual Impacts.
a) Facilities shall be designed to be as visually unobstructed as
possible. Colors and designs must be integrated and
compatible with existing on-site and surrounding buildings
and/or uses in the area. Facilities shall be sited to avoid or
minimize obstruction of views from adjacent properties.
BIB]
37874-U01
ORD-U02
1212-U02
LI2-U03
FO8535-U03
FO9348-U03
DO23861-U03
C5-U03
ORDINANCES-U03
9/9/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04
ORD 1212 pT3 (Ìì . £ Ordinance 1212
Page 7
b) Facilities shall not be of a bright, shiny or glare reflective
finish. The Facility shall be finished in a color to neutralize it
and blend it with, rather than contrast it from, the sky and site
improvements immediately surrounding, provided that,
wherever feasible, a light color shall be used to meet this
requirement.
c) If feasible, the base station/equipment shelter and the wires
and cables necessary for the operation of a Wireless
Communication Facility shall be placed underground so that
the antenna is the only portion of the Facility that is
aboveground. If the base station/equipment shelter is located
within, or on the roof of a building, it may be placed in any
location not visible from surrounding areas outside the
building, with any wires and cables attached to the base
station or equipment shelter screened from the public view.
The applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the
Planning Commission or Public Works Director that it is not
feasible, either technically or because of cost. to locate the
base station/equipment below ground.
d) Innovative Design to minimize visual impact must be used
whenever the screening potential for the site is low. For
example, the visual impact of a site may be mitigated by using
existing light standards and telephone poles as mounting
structures, or by constructing screening structures, which are
compatible with surrounding architecture.
e) Screening of the Facility should take into account the existing
improvements on or adjacent to the site, including
landscaping, walls, fences, berms or other specially designed
devices, which preclude or minimize the visibility of the
Facility and the grade of the site as related to surrounding,
nearby grades of properties and public street right-of-ways.
f) Landscaping, whether natural or artificial, shall be placed so
that the antenna and any other aboveground structures are
screened from view to the extent possible.
g) The maximum antenna height of any Wireless
Communication Facility shall not exceed the maximum height
limit of the underlying zone. The applicant may apply for a
height increase of up to twenty feet beyond the maximum
height of the underlying zone or the maximum height of a
building if both of the following conditions are met:
BIB]
37874-U01
ORD-U02
1212-U02
LI2-U03
FO8535-U03
FO9348-U03
DO23861-U03
C5-U03
ORDINANCES-U03
9/9/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04
ORD 1212 pT3 (Ìì . £ Ordinance 1212
Page8
i. There are no feasible alternate locations or designs
that would allow a facility to meet the underlying zone's
maximum height limit; and
ii. There are exceptional circumstances such as
topography, existing vegetation or structures that
require a Facility to exceed the underlying zone's
maximum height limit in order to function effectively.
D) Maintenance.
Wireless Communication Facilities shall be maintained on a regular, as
needed basis, or not less than once a year. Maintenance shall include
painting and the care and replacement of dead or diseased landscaping
installed to minimize the visual obtrusiveness of the Facility. Maintenance
shall be performed Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:00 a.m.
and 6:00 p.m., unless the maintenance and repair is of an emergency
nature.
E) Termination of Use.
If the Wireless Communication Facility is located on public property or within
a public right-of-way and the permittee desires to terminate its use, written
notice of termination shall be given to the Public Works Director prior to the
commencement of removal. The Facility and all related screening shall be
completely removed from its location and returned to its original condition
within thirty 30) days of the date of such notice. Prior to the
commencement of removal, a cash bond shall be posted by the permittee in
an amount sufficient to cover the cost of such removal. Should the removal
not be completed within the thirty day period, the City may draw upon the
bond and complete the removal of the Facility. Upon completion of the
removal, the bond, or any remaining portion thereof, shall be returned to the
permittee.
F) Fee or Tax-
The City Council may, by Resolution, impose any fee or tax permitted by
law for the placement of a Wireless Communication Facility. Such fee or tax
shall be in addition to any fee imposed by the City Council for an application
for Design Review and a Conditional Use Permit.
SECTION 3. The City Council at the time of the public hearing on the above
matter reviewed and considered the proposed Negative Declaration of Environmental
Impact. The City Council, based upon its public review, does hereby find that said
Negative Declaration has been prepared and was considered pursuant to the
provisions and guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act and hereby
recommends adoption of the Negative Declaration since there is no substantial
evidence that the project will have a significant impact on the environment.
BIB]
37874-U01
ORD-U02
1212-U02
LI2-U03
FO8535-U03
FO9348-U03
DO23861-U03
C5-U03
ORDINANCES-U03
9/9/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04
ORD 1212 pT3 (Ìì . £ Ordinance 1212
Page 9
SECTION 4. That this ordinance shall go into affect and be in full force and
operation from and after thirty 30) days after its final reading and adoption.
PASSED AND APPROVED on this 3rd day of September 2003.
ATTEST:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ss:
CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
I, ROSEMARY M. RAMIREZ, Chief Deputy City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do
hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was regularly introduced and placed upon its first
reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on August 20, 2003. That there after said
Ordinance No. 1212 was duly approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council
on September 3, 2003 by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCUrMEMBERS
ROSEMARY T^RAMJREZ, CMC
CHIEF DEPUTY CITY CLERK
Marlen Garcia, David Olivas, Ricardo Pacheco,
Mayor Pro Tern Bill Van Cleave, and Mayor Manuel
Lozano
None
None
None
BIB]
37874-U01
ORD-U02
1212-U02
LI2-U03
FO8535-U03
FO9348-U03
DO23861-U03
C5-U03
ORDINANCES-U03
9/9/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04