HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007 03 08IN 10111111 F.
rr
AGENDA FOR THE
SPECIAL MEETING
OF THE
CITY COUNCIL
MARCH 8, 2007
5:30 P.M.
Manuel Lozano
Marlen Garcia
Anthony J. Bejarano
David J. Olivas
Ricardo Pacheco
Mayor
- Mayor Pro Tern
- Council Member
- Council Member
- Council Member
PLEASE TURN OFF CULL PHONES AND PAGERS WHILE MEETING IS IN PROCESS
POR FAVOR DE APAGAR SUS TELEFONOS CELULARES YBEEPERS DURANTE LA JUNrA
--------- - .. ......
.. .
PUBLIC CON71VIE if TS C011 EN T ARiOS DEL PUBLICO
The public is encouraged to address the City Se invita al publico a dirigirse al Concilio o cualquiera
Council or any of its Agencies listed on this otra de sus Agencias nombradas en esta agenda,
agenda on any matter posted on the agenda or para hablar sobre cualquier asunto publicado en la
on any other matter within its jurisdiction. If you agenda o cualquter tema quo este bajo su jurisdiccion.
wish to address the City Council or any of its Si usted desea la oportunided de dirigirse al Concilio o
Agencies, you may do so during the PUBLIC alguna de sus Agencias, pods hacerlo durante el
COMMUNICATIONS period noted on the periodo de Comentarios del Publico (Public
agenda. Each person is allowed five (5) minutes Communications) anunciedo en la agenda. A cada
speaking time. A Spanish - speaking interpreter is persona se le permite hablar per cinco (5) minutes.
available for your convenience. Hay un inter rete pars su convcniencia.
City Council
Special Meeting Agenda — March 8, 2007
CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL MEETING - 5.30 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL: Counciimembers: Anthony J. Bejarano, David J. Olivas,
Ricardo Pacheco, Mayor Pro Tern Chair Marlen Garcia
and Mayor Manuel Lozano
INTRODUCTION OF DIGNITARIES FROM SURROUNDING CITIES
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
Five (5) minute speaking time limit
Cinco (5) minutos sera el Iimite para hablar
THIS IS THE TIME SET ASIDE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
PLEASE NOTIFY THE CITY CLERK IF YOU REQUIRE THE SERV ICES OF AN INTERPRETER
No action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special
circumstances exist. The legislative body or its staff may: 1) Briefly respond to statements made or questions
asked by persons; or 2) Direct staff to investigate and/or schedule matters for consideration at a future meeting.
[Government Code §54954.2]
ESTE ES EL PERIODO DESIGNADO PARA DIRIGIRSE AL CONCILIO
FAVOR DE NOTIFICAR A LA SECRETARIA SI REQUIE'RE LOS SERVICIOS DEL INTERPRETE
No se podra tomar acci6n en algun asunto a mends que sea incluido en la agenda, o a menos que exista alguna
emergencia o circunstancia especial. El cuerpo legislativo y su personal podran: 1) Responder brevemente a
declaraci6nes o preguntas hechas par personas; o 2) Dirigir personal a investigar y/o Ijar asuntos para tomar en
consideraci6n en juntas proximas. [Codigo de Gobierno §54954.2]
NEW BUSINESS
1. DISCUSSION OF 101605 INTERCHANGE AND 10 -HOV LANE PROJECTS
ADJOURNMENT
CERTIFICATION
I, Rosemary M. Gutierrez, Chief Deputy City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park hereby certify under penalty of
perjury under the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing agenda was posted on the City Hail bulletin
board not less than 24 hours prior to the meeting. Dated March 7, 2007
,��
Rosemary M. Gutierrez
Chief Deputy City Clerk
City Council
Special Meeting Agenda — March 8, 2007
PLEASE NOTE: Copies of staff reports and supporting documentation pertaining to each item
on this agenda are available for public viewing and inspection at City Nall, 2nd Floor Lobby Area
or at the Los Angeles County Public Library in the City of Baldwin Park. For further information
regarding agenda items, please contact the office of the City Clerk at 626.960.4011, ext. 108 or
626.960.4011, ext. 466 or via e -mail at Lgutierrez�baldwin,oark. corn or
lnieto @baldwinoark. com
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to
participate in this meeting, please contact the Public Works Department or Risk Management at
626.960.4011. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable staff to make reasonable
arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. (28 CFR 34.102.104 ADA TITLE !!)
City Council
Special Meeting Agenda — March S, 2007
,%/%%�/�
M
1�
L
TO: Honorable (Mayor and Members of the City C un
FROM: Vijay Singhal, Chief Executive Officer
DATE: March 8, 2007
SUBJECT: 10606 Project Update
PURPOSE
To provide the City Council an update on the 101605 Interchange project
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
The Infrastructure Fonda
The Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006,
approved by the voters as Proposition 1 B on November 7, 2006, includes a program of
funding from $4.5 billion to be deposited in the Corridor Mobility Improvement Account
(CMIA ). The California Transportation Commission (CTC) solicited project
recommendations from California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and other
regional agencies.
10 -605 Intercan a Project
City of Baldwin Park along with other cities in the San Gabriel Valley lobbied for 10/605
Interchange project. This project is more than 22 years overdue for an upgrade, has an
accident rate that is 4 -times the State average and causes significant pollution and
health risks for the surrounding communities. The traffic jam at the interchange causes
motorists to use our local streets as a detour causing accidents including fatalities.
MTA Board and local Caltrans office nominated the project for CMIA funding but
Caltrans in Sacramento removed the project from the recommended list.
CTC staff analyzed the various nominations but did not recommend the 101605 project
for funding. City Council of the City of Baldwin Park along with elected representatives
from other cities garnered support from the CTC Commissioner Esteban Torres, ,
Congresswoman Hilda Solis, Assemblymember Ed. Hernandez, Senator Gloria
Romero, MTA Chair Gloria Molina and MTA Board Member John Fasana.
10 -605 Project Update
March 8, 2007
Page 2
Dr. Hernandez mobilized a San Gabriel Valley Caucus that included Assemblymembers
and Senators from surrounding districts. Council Members and staff from City of
Baldwin Park and surrounding cities met with legislators including Assembly and Senate
Transportation Committee Chairs, met with MTA and Caltrans staff and attended CTC
hearings in Sacramento and Irvine. Additionally the coalition also held a Transportation
Summit and a Press Conference at the Athol Bridge in Baldwin Park. Many San Gabriel
Valley cities also passed resolutions supporting the project.
As a result of these collective efforts, CTC directed Caltrans at its meeting in Irvine on
February 28, 2007 to fund the 101605 project from State Highway Operations and
Protection Program (SHOPP) funds. CTC approved a resolution to this effect and
Caltrans Director Will Kempton made a commitment at the CTC meeting to fund the
project from SHOPP funds. Formal approval of funding would happen at a subsequent
CTC meeting. At the same meeting it was also discussed that MTA will advance
moneys to get the project started and get reimbursement from Caltrans when the
project is formally approved by CTC (sometime in May -June 2007). A copy of CTC
resolution is not yet available. It is expected to be released after the next CTC meeting.
While we have a commitment from CTC and Caltrans, we need to ensure that this
commitment transform into a formal approval and funding. It will be several years before
the construction on the project would start even if the funding becomes available right
away. The traffic situation is getting worse every day and therefore it is necessary to
ensure that the project receives formal funding approval and the work on this project
starts ASAP.
10 -HOV Lane pLoject
Additionally while the LA County received its fair share due to help from San Gabriel
Valley coalition, San Gabriel Valley did not receive funding at all from the bonds even
though the San Gabriel Valley recorded one of the highest support for the bonds (even
higher than the LA County). The 10 HOV lane expansions was allocated $97 million in
the first round of CTC recommendations but was deleted in the second and final round.
San Gabriel Valley needs to lobby MTA to fund the 10 -HOV lane.
Next Steps
At this time we only have a commitment. While we have no reason to believe that CTC
or Caltrans would not follow up on their commitment, however, given State's past
experience of shifting funding and priorities, it is only prudent to make sure that the
funding is formally approved ASAP. As stated earlier at the CTC meeting in Irvine the
issue of advance funding of the 101605 project was raised by Caltrans Director. We
have now heard that Caltrans may not need MTA to advance fund the project. We have
also heard that Caltrans may initiate the environmental work in the next budget year
(after July 2007). Since this is one of the many projects that Caltrans and MTA are
working on and since there are several agencies (CTC, Caltrans Sacramento and Local,
MTA), involved in this process it is important to identify and coordinate future steps
10 -605 Project Update
March 8, 2007
Page 3
necessary to expedite the process of securing funding for the 10/605 and 10 -HOV
projects and to make sure that every one is on the same page. It is expected that MTA
staff will make a recommendation to the MTA Board for funding of the 10 -HOV lanes at
the March 22, 2007 Board meeting.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council provide direction to staff on the following
proposed action items and request the other cities and legislators to continue to lobby
MTA, Caltrans and CTC until the San Gabriel receives funding for 101605 and 10 -HOV
lane projects.
® Meet with Caltrans to discuss their plan for funding of the project including project
timeline
Meet with MTA to seek MTA Board approval for advance funding of the project as
discussed at the CTC meeting in Irvine and to seek MTA approval for the 1 O -HOV
lanes
Direct staff to work with Caltrans local office to assist with the environmental
process
■ Direct staff to continue to coordinate with other cities to continue and maintain our
collaborative efforts
Thank the elected representatives from other cities and legislators for their
support and participation and request them to continue to be part of this coalition
and support the efforts to get San Gabriel Valley its fair share
Any additional directions deemed necessary based on discussions at the meeting