Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2004 02 18
NOTICE AND CALL OF A SPECIAL MEETING of .Lire BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL BALDWIN PARK COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Special Meeting of the City Council and Community Redevelopment Agency is hereby called to be held on WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 18, 2004, at 6:00 P.M. in the Council Chamber, 14403 E. Pacific Avenue, Baldwin Park, CA 91706. Said Special Meeting shall be for the purpose of conducting business in accordance with the attached Agenda. Dated. February 12, 2004 NO OTHER BUSINESS WILL BE DISCUSSED "Original Signed" Manuel Lozano Mayor AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING 1, Kathleen R. Sessman, Deputy City Clerk, certify that I caused the Notice and Call of a Special Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council and Community Redevelopment Agency to be held Wednesday, February 18, 2004, at 6;00 p.m., in the Council Chamber, 14403 E. Pacific Ave., Baldwin Park, CA, to be delivered via email (hard copy to follow) to each Council and Agency Member, and the San Gabriel Valley Tribune, and that I posted said notice at the two City Hall bulletin boards and at the Community Center on Thursday, February 12, 2004. F� Kathleen R. &ess,(nan, CMC Deputy City Clerk CITY OF BALDWIN PARK SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA CITY COUNCIL COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 18� 2i-�— --~ Pleafsee No 6:00 P.M. Time COUNCIL CHAMBER 14403 E. PACIFIC AVENUE BALDWIN PARK, CALIFORNIA 91706 PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Five (5) minute speaking time limit - Onco (5) minutos sera ei Urnite para habiar "No action or discussion shall be taken on any item not appearing on the posted agenda, except the members of the legislative body or its staff, who may briefly respond to statements made or questions posed by persons..." (GC §54954.2) Si desea habiar acerca de cualquier tema, esta sera su oportunidad. Par favor pase adelante. Un interprete estara presente. 'I. ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION OF THE CITY COUNCIL, REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND HOUSING AUTHORITY A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION (GC §54956.9(x)) Name of Case: Redevelopment Agency of the City of Baldwin Park vs. D & D Golf Cars; et al. Case Number: BC278575 (LASC) B. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT (GC §54957) Title: Community Development Director Title: Personnel /Risk Manager Title: Finance Director Title: Chief Executive Officer C. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION (GC §54956.9) a. Significant exposure to litigation, pursuant to Section 54956.9(b) Number of Cases: (1) 2. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION 3. REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION 4. COUNCIL 1 STAFF REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 5. ADJOURN NO OTHER MATTERS WILL BE DISCUSSED Agenda — February 18, 2004 CERTIFICATE OF POSTING Page 3 I, Kathleen R. Sessman, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing agenda was posted not less than 24 hours prior to said meeting. Dated this 12th day of February 2004. K thleen R. ess an, CMC Deputy City Clerk Copies of staff reports and supporting documentation pertaining to each item on this agenda are available for public viewing and inspection at City Hall, 2nd Floor Lobby Area or at the Los Angeles County Public Library in the City of Baldwin Park. For further information regarding agenda items, please contact the office of the City Clerk at 626.960.4011, ext. 108 or 466, or via e -mail at rramirez &baldwinp rk.com or ksessa7an@ba1dwinpark.cor7 In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, p €ease contact the Public Works Department or Risk Management at 626.960.4011. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable staff to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. (28 CFR 34.102,104 ADA TITLE II) CITY OF BALDWIN PARK REGULAR MEETING AGENDA CITY COUNCIL COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY HOUSING & FINANCING AUTHORITY FEBRUARY 18, 2004 7:00 PM COUNCIL CHAMBER 14403 E. PACIFIC AVENUE BALDWIN PARK A. CALL TO ORDER B, INVOCATION C. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE D. ROLL CALL: COUNCILMEMBERS: Marten Garcia, David Olivas, Ricardo Pacheco, Mayor Pro Tem Bill Van Cleave and Mayor Manuel Lozano E. ANNOUNCEMENTS F. PROCLAMATIONS, COMMENDATIONS & PRESENTATIONS • Introduction of newly appointed Code Enforcement Department employee Michael Teran, Building Inspector CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Five (5) minute speaking time limit - Cinco (5) minutos sera ei limite para hablar "No action or discussion shall be taken on any item not appearing on the posted agenda, except the members of the legislative body or its staff, who may briefly respond to statements made or questions posed by persons..." (GC §54954.2) Si desea hablar acerca de cuaiquier tema, esta sera su oportunidad. Per favor pase adelante. Un interprete estara presence. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR All items listed are considered to be routine business by the City Council and will be approved with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so requests, in which case, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. A. MINUTES Approve minutes of January 14, 2004 (Special); February 4, 2004 (Special Study); and February 9, 2004 (Special). B. WARRANTS AND DEMANDS Recommendation: Receive and file. C. TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JANUARY 2004 Recommendation: Receive and File Agenda — February 4, 2004 Page 2 D. PROPOSED RECOGNITIONS BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FOR TI IIE PERIOD OF FEBRUA RY 10, 210 04 TO MARCH 3, 2004 Recommendation: Approve the preparation and presentation of the proposed certificates, proclamations and plaques. E. APPROVAL OF PROPOSED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT - DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Recommendation: Approve the proposed Employment Agreement with Oscar W. Orci, to serve as Community Development Director, effective March 8, 2004. F. APPROVAL OF FACILITY USE AGREEMENT — BASSETT LITTLE LEAGUE Recommendation: Approve a Facility Use Agreement with the Bassett Little League and authorize Mayor to execute the Agreement. G. REQUEST TO APPROPRIATE GRANT FUNDS FOR THE PURPOSE OF ESTABLISHING POLICE COMMUNICATIONS INTEROPERABILITY Recommendation: 1) Authorize the Police Department staff to proceed with purchasing the required radio interoperability equipment; 2) Authorize the Finance Director to make a budget amendment in the amount of $18,174 to the Grant Funds and appropriate the funds to police cost center 139.28.5745; and 3) Authorize the Chief of Police to complete any required documents for processing the purchase of equipment and for acquiring the full reimbursement of grant funds. H. MID -YEAR STATUS UPDATE OF CHAMBER OF COMMERCE CONTRACT Recommendation: Receive and file. 2. SET MATTERS — PUBLIC HEARINGS (7:0o P.M. or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard). If in the future you wish to challenge the following in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk and /or City Council at or prior to the public hearing. A. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN LAND (AGP -106) AND ZONE CHANGE (Z -539) (LOCATION: 3224 -3356 BALDWIN PARK BOULEVARD AND 13712 -13716 FOSTER AVENUE; APPLICANT. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK) Recommendation: Following public hearing, 1) Adopt the Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact; and 2) Waive further reading, read by title only and introduce for first reading Ordinance No. 1227 entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ADOPTING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT, TO REDESIGNATE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO RESIDENTIAL GARDEN AND A ZONE CHANGE FROM R -1, SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL GARDEN TO RG, RESIDENTIAL GARDEN (APPLICANT: CITY OF BALDWIN PARK; CASE NO.: AGP -106 AND Z -539). . Agenda — February 4, 2004 Page 3 B. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE (Z -538), A DEVELOPMENT PLAiv 'DR-` AND A TENTATIVE TRACT IUAF' (TM- 60796) - LOCATION: 3242 -3250 BALDWIN PARK BOULEVARD; APPLICANT: ALTURAS ENGINEERING AND ASSOCIATES Recommendation: Following public hearing, 1) Adopt the Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact; 2) Waive further reading, read by title only and introduce for first reading Ordinance No. 1228 entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ADOPTING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND APPROVING A ZONE CHANGE TO ALLOW THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) OVERLAY ON THE RG, RESIDENTIAL GARDEN ZONE ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3242 -3250 BALDWIN PARK BLVD (APPLICANT: ALTURAS ENGINEERING AND ASSOCIATES; CASE NO.: Z -538); 3) Waive further reading, read by title only and adopt Resolution No. 2004 -011 entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ADOPTING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN ALLOWING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A FIVE (5) UNIT SINGLE - FAMILY DETACHED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (APPLICANT: ALTURAS ENGINEERING AND ASSOCIATES; CASE NO.: DR -25; LOCATION: 3242 -3250 BALDWIN PARK BLVD.); and 4) Approve a Tentative Tract Map No. 60796 to subdivide one (1) lot into six (6) for residential purposes. 3. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES TO DEVELOP A BUILDING FEE SCHEDULE FOR PLAN CHECKING AND INSPECTION SERVICES Recommendation: 1) Award the contract to MAXIMUS Group in an amount not to exceed $16,000 and a total of $1,500 in expenses for the professional consultant services to perform a Building Fee Schedule for Plan Checking and Inspection Services; 2) Direct staff to include the fee study costs for the Planning Division, proceed and execute the amended contract for a total of $25,500 plus $1,750 maximum expenses for the Building and Planning Fee Schedule Study with MAXIMUS Group; and 3) Authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement. B. INSTALLATION OF STOP SIGNS, SPEED BUMPS AND TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES Recommendation: Receive and file. C. RESOLUTION CONSENTING TO JOINT PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED AMENDMENT 2004 TO REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS OF THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION Agenda — February 4, 2004 Page 4 Recommendation: Waive further reading read by title only and adopt Resolution No. 2004 -009 entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OAF BALLDIWIN PARK CONSENTING TO JOINT PUBLIC:; HEARING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AND THE BALDWIN PARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT 2004 TO REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS OF THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION PREPARED IN CONNECTION THEREWITH" D. DOWNTOWN STREET MARKET (CONTINUED FROM FEBRUARY a, 2004) Recommendation: Provide direction to staff on whether Council wishes to continue or not continue with the Downtown Street Market. E. RESOLUTIONS SUPPORTING PROPOSITION 57 AND 58 Recommendation: 1) Waive further reading read by title only and adopt Resolution No. 2004 -013 entitled, " A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, DECLARING ITS SUPPORT OF PROPOSITION 57 — THE ECONOMIC RECOVERY BOND ACT;" and 2) Waive further reading read by title only and adopt Resolution No. 2004 -014 entitled, " A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, DECLARING ITS SUPPORT OF PROPOSITION 58 — THE CALIFORNIA BALANCED BUDGET ACT." F. REQUEST TO PROVIDE GRANT FUNDING TO NEW BEGINNINGS ROYAL RANGERS Recommendation: Review the information provided about the Royal Rangers program and determine whether to approve a grant in an amount not to exceed $500. G. EMPLOYEE CLASSIFICATIONS AND COMPENSATION Recommendation: Receive and file. H. ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CITY'S CONTRACT WITH CALPERS TO INCLUDE THE 3% AT 50 RETIREMENT BENEFIT FOR SWORN PERSONNEL Recommendation: 1) Waive further reading, read by title only and introduce for first reading Ordinance No. 1223 entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AND BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC;" 3) Waive further reading, read by title only and adopt Resolution No. 2004 -006 entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT BETWEEN THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK." .. Agenda — February 4, 2004 PROPOSED URGENCY AND REGULAR ORDINANCE RELATING TO UNCLASSIFIED SERVICE EMPLOYEES (CONTINUED FROM FEBRUARY 4, 2004) Recommendation: 1) Waive further reading, read by title only and adopt an URGENCY Ordinance No. 1225 entitled, "AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING SECTIONS 31.03 AND 33.05 OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE TO PLACE MANAGERS IN THE UNCLASSIFIED SERVICE AND TO CONFORM THE ORDINANCE RELATING TO DEPARTMENT HEAD EMPLOYMENT TO THE CURRENT PRACTICES," AND 2) Waive further reading, read by title only and introduce for first reading Ordinance No. 1226 entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING SECTIONS 31.03 AND 33.05 OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE TO PLACE MANAGERS IN THE UNCLASSIFIED SERVICE AND TO CONFORM THE ORDINANCE RELATING TO DEPARTMENT HEAD EMPLOYMENT TO THE CURRENT PRACTICES," OR, AS AN ALTERNATIVE: 3) Waive further reading, read by title only and adopt an URGENCY Ordinance No. 1225 entitled, "AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING SECTION 33.05 OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE TO PLACE MANAGERS IN THE UNCLASSIFIED SERVICE AND TO CONFORM THE ORDINANCE RELATING TO DEPARTMENT HEAD EMPLOYMENT TO THE CURRENT PRACTICES;" AND 4) Waive further reading, read by title only and introduce for first reading Ordinance No. 1226 entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING SECTION 33.05 OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE TO PLACE MANAGERS IN THE UNCLASSIFIED SERVICE AND TO CONFORM THE ORDINANCE RELATING TO DEPARTMENT HEAD EMPLOYMENT TO THE CURRENT PRACTICES," 4. COUNCIL 1 STAFF REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 5. CLOSED SESSION 6. ADJOURN PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Five (5) minute speaking time limit — Cinco (5) minutos sera el limite para hablar "No action or discussion shall be taken on any item not appearing on the posted agenda, except the members of the legislative body or its staff, who may briefly respond to statements made or questions posed by persons..." (GC §54954.2) Si desea hablar acerca de cualquier terra, esta sere su oportunidad. Por favor pase adelante. Un interprete estara presente. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Ail items listed are considered to be routine business by the City Council and will be approved with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so requests, in which case, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. A. MINUTES Recommendation: Approve minutes of February 4, 2004. Agenda -- February 4, 2004 Recommendation: Approve Warrant Register No. 593. --141 Idiom IATAI :4 Effic-N 3. REPORTS OF OFFICERS Page 6 A. RESOLUTION CONSENTING TO JOINT PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED AMENDMENT 2004 TO REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS OF THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION Recommendation: Waive further reading read by title only and adopt Resolution No. 388 entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK CONSENTING TO JOINT PUBLIC HEARING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AND THE BALDWIN PARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT 2004 TO REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS OF THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION PREPARED IN CONNECTION THEREWITH" 4. AGENCY 1 STAFF REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 5. CLOSED SESSION 6. ADJOURN HOUSING & FINANCING AUTHORITY PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Five (5) minute speaking time limit - Cinco (5) minutos sera el limite para hablar "No action or discussion shell be taken on any item not appearing on the posted agenda, except the members of the legislative body or its staff, who may briefly respond to statements made or questions posed by persons..." (GC §54954,2) Si desea hablar acerca de cualquier tema, esta sera su oportunidad. Por favor pase adelante. Un interprete estara presente. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR All items listed are considered to be routine business by the Authorities and will be approved with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Member so requests, in which case, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. A. MINUTES Recommendation: Approve minutes of January 21, 2004. B. HOUSING DEPARTMENT STATUS REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JANUARY 2004 Recommendation: Receive and file. C. BALDWIN PARK HOUSING AUTHORITY'S VOUCHER PAYMENT STANDARD INCREASE Recommendation: Approve the increase to the current Payment Standard to 110% of the federal Fair Market Rents making it effective March 1, 2004. 2. PUBLIC HEARINGS 3. REPORTS OF OFFICERS Agenda — February 4, 2004 Page 7 4, AGENCY / STAFF REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 5. CLOSED SESSION 6. ADi0URN CERTIFICATE OF POSTING I, Kathleen R. Sessman, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing agenda was posted not less than 72 hours prior to said meeting. Dated this 12th day of February 2004. 0_� 2"� K thleen R. ess an Deputy City Clerk Copies of staff reports and supporting documentation pertaining to each item on this agenda are available for public viewing and inspection at City Hail, 2nd Floor Lobby Area or at the Los Angeles County Public Library in the City of Baldwin Park. For further information regarding agenda items, please contact the office of the City Clerk at 626.960.4011, ext. 108 or 466, or via e -mail at rramire - baldwinpark.com or ksessman(a baidL i ark. corn In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the Public Works Department or Risk Management at 626.960.4011. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable staff to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. (28 CFR 34.102.104 ADA TITLE II) IFEER U, j. FEB 1 8 2004 UNAPPROVED /UNOFFICIAL j Ef�M ISO. - -� _ COUNCIL CHAMBER JANUARY 14, 2004 14403 E. PACIFIC AVENUE WEDNESDAY BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 6:30 P.M. The CITY COUNCIL and COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of the City of Baldwin Park met in SPECIAL SESSION at the above time and place. ROLL CALL Present: Councilmember /Member Marlen Garcia, David Olivas, Ricardo Pacheco, Mayor Pro - Tem /Vice -Chair Bill Van Cleave, and Mayor /Chair Manuel Lozano Also Present: Dayle Keller, Chief Executive Officer /Executive Director; Mark Kling, Chief of Police; and Kathleen Sessman, Deputy City Clerk Absent /Excused: Stephanie Scher, City Attorney /Agency Attorney CLOSED SESSION The Council /Agency recessed to Closed Session at 7:45 p.m. and reconvened at 8:30 p.m., with all members present. Chief Executive Officer Keller reported the action as follows: PUBLIC EMPLOYEE EMPLOYMENT (GC §54957) Title: Community Development Director ACTION: Direction was given. No final action was taken. Nothing further to report. COUNCIL / STAFF REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS REQUEST BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER KELLER FOR DISCUSSION OF THE POSSIBLE RECLASSIFICATION OF THE PERSONNEL /RISK MANAGER POSITION AS A DEPARTMENT HEAD After a brief discussion regarding the Personnel /Risk Manager position, Chief Executive Officer Keller was directed to schedule and conduct interviews with qualified applicants and provide Council with an update. She was further directed to contact League of California Cities and AAE Incorporated and inquire about temporary staffing of the Personnel /Risk Manager position. ADJOURNMENT There being no other matters before the Council /Agency, the meeting was adjourned at 8:35 P.M. Special Meeting Minutes — January 14, 2004 Approved as presented by the Council /Agency at their meeting held Kathleen R. Sessman Deputy City Clerk Jose Sanchez Agency Secretary Page 2 U NAPPROVEDIUNOFFICIAL COUNCIL CHAMBER 14403 E. PACIFIC AVENUE BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 CC�C�UA.0.. nnnn 1 E_ E r -,,.v, , cvu-t WEDNESDAY 6:00 P.M. The CITY COUNCIL and COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of the City of Baldwin Park met in STUDY SESSION at the above time and place. ROLL CALL Present: Councilmember /Member Marlen Garcia, David Olivas, Ricardo Pacheco, Mayor Pro - TemlVice -Chair Bill Van Cleave, and Mayor /Chair Manuel Lozano Also Present: Dayle Keller, Chief Executive Officer /Executive Director; Stephanie Scher, City Attorney /Agency Attorney; Mark Kling, Chief of Police; Jose Sanchez, Finance Director; Shafique Naiyer, Public Works Director; Melecio Picazo, Interim Community Development Director; Manny Carrillo, Recreation and Community Services Director; and Kathleen Sessman, Deputy City Clerk SUBSEQUENT NEED ITEM ADDED TO AGENDA Attorney Scher advised the Agency /City Council that two (2) items regarding Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation had developed after the posting of the notice of agenda. There is an immediate need to provide a briefing to the City Council regarding this matter. Attorney Scher recommended that this matter be added to the Closed Session portion of this agenda. A motion was made to add the items as recommended by the attorney as follows: CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL -- ANTICIPATED LITIGATION (GC §54356.9) — Number of Cases: (2) MOTION: Mayor Pro Tern Van Cleave SECOND: Councilmember Pacheco Carried CLOSED SESSION The Council /Agency recessed to Closed Session at 6:15 p.m. and reconvened at 7:00 p.m., recessed at 8:55 p.m. and reconvened at 9:40 p.m., with all members present. City Attorney /Agency Attorney Stephanie R. Scher reported the action as follows: CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION (GC §54956.9) a. Significant exposure to litigation, pursuant to Section 54956.9(b) Number of Cases: (3) ACTION: Direction was given to Counsel. No final action was taken. Nothing further to report. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION (GC §54956.9(a)) Name of Case: Nellie Stoykovich vs. City of Baldwin Park Case Number: KC 042520L ACTION: Direction was given to City Attorney. No final action was taken. Nothing further to report. Study Session Minutes — February 4, 2004 Page 2 PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT IGC §54957). Title: Community Development Director ACTION: No reportable action was taken. Nothing further to report. Title: Personnel /Risk Manager ACTION: No reportable action was taken. Nothing further to report. PRESENTATIONS FREEWAY IMPROVEMENT PRESENTATION David Lopez, Associate Engineer provided Council with an update on Freeway Improvements within the City of Baldwin Park. ADJOURNMENT There being no other matters before the Council /Agency, the meeting was adjourned at 9:40 p.m. Approved as presented by the Council /Agency at their meeting held Kathleen R. Sessman Deputy City Clerk Jose Sanchez Agency Secretary UNAPPROVED/UNOFFICIAL COUNCIL CHAMBER FEBRUARY 9, 2.004 14403 E. PACIFIC AVENUE MONDAY BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 1:30 P.M. The CITY COUNCIL of the City of Baldwin Park met in SPECIAL SESSION at the above time and place. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Manuel Lozano and Councilmember Marlen Garcia Absent /Excused: Councilmember David Olivas, Ricardo Pacheco and Mayor Pro -Tem Bill Van Cleave Also Present: Dayle Keller, Chief Executive Officer; Kara Bouton, Assistant to the Chief Executive Officer; Mark Kling, Chief of Police; Melecio Picazo, Interim Community Development Director; Manny Carrillo, Recreation and Community Services Director; and Dolores Gonzalez -Hayes NEW BUSINESS REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING TOUR WITH CALIFORNIA STATE TREASURER PHIL ANGELIDES Redevelopment and Housing Tour was conducted. ADJOURNMENT There being no other matters before the Council, the meeting was adjourned at 2:30 p.m. Approved as presented by the Council at their meeting held Kathleen R. Sessman Deputy City Clerk CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FEB 1_ 8 2004 1TEM NO, BALDWIN CITY OF BALDWIN PARK STAFF REPORT 11. A,R•K TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Jose Sanchez, Finance Director DATE: February 18, 2004 SUBJECT: Warrants and Demands PURPOSE: The purpose of this report is for the City Council to allow the payment of Warrants and Demands against the City of Baldwin Park. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: The payroll of the City of Baldwin Park consisting of check numbers 150767 to 151157, inclusive,: voids: 150767, 150769, 150771, 150779, 150793, and 151158 for the period of January 18, 2004 through January 31, 2004 inclusive, has been presented and hereby ratified, in the amount of $470,646.54. General Warrants, including check numbers 141984 to 142128 inclusive, in the total amount of $677,319.42, constituting claims and demands against the City of Baldwin Park, are here with presented to the City Council as required by law, and the same hereby ratified. Pursuant to Section 37208 of the Government Code, the Chief Executive Officer or designee does hereby certify to the accuracy of the demands hereinafter referred to and to the availability of funds for payment thereof. RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. .ty of BaAdwin Park Feb 10, 2004 08.30am Page I :yment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/00011 to 99,99/9999 Check /AW 's 141984 to 142128 Payment Type Cfeck �;�nd# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Checkt Chk. Gate Check Amount. tep 5524 AMT TRAVEL CEINTERS AP 141988 01/28/04 700.00 .aiff& General Description 7578 2004 EMPLOYEE RECOWTION DINNER GRAND PRIZE TRAVEL GIFT CERTIFICATE F44 Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amowlt 0 01/28/04 700.00 0.00 70D.00 GL Distribution grass Amount Description 150 -00 -2176 700.00 TRAVEL GIFT CERT -GRAND PRIZE 2004 end# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Rafe Check Amount Sep 7132 CRYSTAL BY DESIGN CO. INC, AP 141989 01/28/04 449.24 a.im# General Description '7579 TEN iaLA55 Ad�1PSpS EMPLOYEE RECOC,t4ITIaN i�i1dNER JANUARY 30, 2004 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gro,55 Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 14-14447 01/23104 444.24 0.00 444.24 GL Distribution Gross amount Descri.DtiQn 1030 -81 -5000 449.24 AWARDS-EMPLY REC DINNER 2004 `r_nd# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7:1.33 DISNEY STORE AP 141490 01/28/04 660.00 aim# General Description (580 FOUR ANNUAL DISNEYLAND PASSES 2004 EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION DINNER Pit# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/28/04 660.00 0.00 660100 GL Distribution 62o55 Amount Description 150 -00 -2176 660.00 4 ANNUAL PASSES ,end# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep '43 F&A FEDERAL CREDIT UNION AP 141991 01/28/04 2,3356.00 .aim# General Description '`81 2004 EMPLY RECOGNITION DINNER PRIZES 4 UNIVERSAL STUDIO PASSES 400 MOVIE TICKETS 200 -AMC, 200- EDWARDS ,. PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Grass Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01128104 2,356x00 0.00 2,356.00 GL Distribution gross Amount Description 150 -06-2176 430.00 DINNER PRIZE TICKETS 100 -81 -5330 1,926.00 DINNER PRIZE TICKETS a'_AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) "y of Baldwin Park Feb 10, 2004 08,30am Page 2 �yment History. Dank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #`s 141984 to 142128 Payment Type Check Q,nd# Vendor Name Remitk Payee Bank Check# Chk mate Check Amount Sep ^138 ALEX CARROLL AP 141993* 01`29/04 60.00 a.im# General Description ;7182 PROVIDE STAFF TRAINING FOR YOUTH BASKETBALL. PRG PO4 Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gres, Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/28/04 60.00 0.00 67.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 150 -00 -2154 60.00 STAFF TR'NG BSKTBL PR6 'cnd# Vendor Name Remit# Payee .02 BALDWIN PARK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE .61Mt General Description 11.;87 DECEMBER SERVICE. Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount ;yep AP 141794 01/29/N 6,667.00 PO# &tat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used M35155 01/01/04 6,667.00 0.00 aL Distribution 103 -81 -5240 'enrd#I Vendor Dame 245 BALDWIN PARK PIZZA aim# General Description `783 PIZZA TEEN CENTER SNACK BAR PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 0 GL Distribution 1.00 -76 -5220 'and# Vendor [dame 3845 BALDWIN PARK PIZZA .aim#' General Description r "'084 FOO() STAR= BSKT3L CLINIC 01/25/04 PO# Stat Contr= =act# invoice# 0 GL Distribution 150 -00-0154 Gross Amount Description 6,667.00 DEC SERVICES Remit# Payee Net Amount 6,667.00 Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 141995 01/29/04 97.15 Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 01/28/04 97.25 0.170 97.25 Gross Amount Description 97.25 PIZZA TEEN CENTER SNACK BAR Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Gate Check Amount Sep AP 141996 01/29/04. 100.20 Y Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Piet Amount 01/28/04 100.20 0.00 100.20 Dross Amounr Description 100.20 FOOD STAFF BASKETBALL � nd# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Cheek Amount Sep �-:I12 BALDWIN PARK PONY LEAGUE AP 141997 01/29/04 35.00 aim# General Description ;7619 DECEMBER BASEBALL SPORTS SCHOLARSHIP All# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Piet Amount 0 01/28/04 35.00 0,00 35.00 GL Distribution Gros: Amount Description 120 -43- 5050 -084 35.00 DEC BASEBALL SCHOLARSHIP Accounts Payable release 6.13 td*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) -Y of Baldsuin Park Feb 10, 2004 08Mam Page 4 s.DFment History. Bank AP Payment Bates 00/00 /01)#4 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #'s 141984 to 142128 Payment Type Greek rEnd# Vendor name Remit# Payee. Bank Check# Chk. [Data Check Amount Sep 2938 BILL VAN CLEAVE Ail' 141998 01/29/04 50.00 '.,im# General Description S7585 FINANCE RUTH MOIITHLY NTG ALLOWANCE MTG 01/21/44 PO# Stai Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt gross Amount Discount Amt [Discount Used let Amount 10387 0 0 01/28/04 50.00 0100 50,00 GL [Distribution gross Amount Description 100 -81 -5000 50.00 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2003/2004* FINANCING AUTHORITY dEETING ALLONA14CE PO Liquidation Amount 100 - 81-5000 54,0 FIlnd# Vendor Nacre Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk [Date Check Amount Sep 2938 BILL VAN CLEAVE AP 141999 01/29/04 50.00 Y .aim# General [Description 17586 HSG RUTH MOKPILY MTG ALLOWANCE 01/21/04 PO# 5tat Contract# invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount it count Amt Discount Used Net Amount 10392 0 0 01/28/04 54.00 0.00 50.50 GL Distribution Gross Amount 1)escription 102 -01 -5000 -014 50.00 MTG 01/21/04 PO Liquidation Amount 102 -01 -5000 -014 50.00 'Eid# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 093 COMP USA, INC AP 142000 01/29/04 865.011 .aim# General Description 11588 MAINT CONTRACT P4# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount [Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 3236112 12012103 865.00 0.00 865M GL (Distribution Bross Amount /Description 102-42 - 5264 -014 865,00 MAINT end#( Vendor Name Remit& Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount SeP 06 COOPER DELIVERY SERVICE AP 142001 01/29/04 135.00 81,t# General (Description i= 89 DELIVERY SERV POf Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Grosz Amount [Discount Amt (Discount Used Net Amount 200Q00054 01/13/04 135.00 0.00 135 X0 GL [Distribution Gross Amount Description 100 -04 -5210 135,00 200.13,0019411, 2043003096,200300322Ij ;5,.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) .sy of Baldwin Par4 Feb 10, 2004 08e30am Page 5 }yment History. Bank AP Payment Dates Ofi /0010060 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #`s 141984 to 142128 Payment Type Check , nd# Vendor game. R..emit# Payee Park Che&# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 6I0 DAVID U OLIVAS AP 142002 01/29/04 50.00 aim# General Description ::7590 FINANCE RUTH MONTHLY MTG ALLOWANCE 01/21/04 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Grass Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 10388 O 0 01/28/04 50,00 0.00 50,00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 100 -81 -5000 50,00 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2003/2004* FINANCING AUTHORITY MEETING ALLOWANCE PO Liquidation Amount 1.00 -81 -5000 50.00 Tod# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount :yep 6610 DAVID J OLIVAS AP 142003 01/29/04 50.00 Y 'iim# General Description ;7591 HOUSING AUTH MONTHLY MTG ALLOWANCE Oi/21/04 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt dross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 10393 0 0 01128104 50.00 0.00 50.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 102 -01 -5000 -014 50.01 KTG 1/21/04 PO Liquidation Amount 102 - 01-5000 -014 50.00 efid# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 1009 ED LOPEZ AP 142004 01/29/04 2.10.00 aim# General Description i(621 PER DIE14 "EXECUTIVE DEV' COURSE 03/15/04-03/19104 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 0 GL Distribution 106 - :6-534Q 'end# Vendor Name 1009 ED LOPEZ Invc Di #boss amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 01/28/74 210.00 0.00 214.00 Gross Amount Description 210.00 PER DIEM EXEC DEV 3/15-19/04 Remit# Payee ai.m# General Description ;7622 PER DIEM EXECUTIVE DEV COURSE 04/19/04- 04/23/[14 Banc, Check# Clik Date Check Amount Sep AP 142005 01/29/04 210.00 Y PO# 'Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/28/04. 210.00 0100 210.00 uL Distribution Gross Amount Description 106 -25 -53'0 210.00 PER DIEM EXEC DEV 4/19 -23/04 1.AP y Accounts Pa able Release 6.1,3 NIIAPR70C1 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) ry of Baldwin Park Feb 10, 21004 08.30am Page 6 /ment history. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 :heck /A,H #`s 141984 to 142128 Payment Type Check end# Vendor Name Remit#' Payee. Rank 0-,ech# 0*,' Date Check; Amount Sep 5977 FLAMINGO RESORT HOTEL AP 142006 01/29/04 408.75 �Iim# General Description ")'7623 LODGING -ED LOPEZ "EXECUTIVE DEV" 04!19/04 - 04/23/04 ISO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount [viscount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/28/04 40$.75 0.00 408.75 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 106 -25 -53411 408.75 E LOPEZ 4/19-23/04 !end# Vendor Dame Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep :5877 FLAMINGO RESORT HOTEL AP 142007 011/29/04 408.75 Y uim# General Description 7;7624 LOD61NG -ED LOPEZ "EXECUTIVE REV" 03/15/04 - 03/1.9/04 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Df Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/28/04 Q8.75 0 a 00 406.75 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 1045 -25 -534.0 408.75 ED LOPEZ 3/15/04 - 'x/19104 ; :_nd# Vendor (dame Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 2386 IRMA GARCIA AP 142008 01/29/04 200.E0 :ii m# General Description ,7592 DRAGON /LION DANCER PERFORANCE CHINESE NEW YEAR CELEBRATION PO# ;tat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Grass Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/28/04 200.040 0.00 200.010 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 10073- 521.0 200,00 DRAGIB /LION DANCER --------------------.-------------_-_-----------_-------..__-_.._______..___.----_---_---------------------------------------.------- ;,- ..rErl# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Ch,-,-k#' Chk Date Check Amount Sep 1023 JAIME SANCHEZ AP 142009 01/29/04 62.77 General Description REIt1B MONTHLY EXP PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/28/04 62,77 0.00 62.77 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 10242 -5210 -014 62.77 REINS EXP 'end# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep ' 172 JAMES P FRUCTUOSO, C.P.A. AP 142010 01/29/014 3,362.50 .aim# General Description 17594 ACCOUNTING SERVICES 11/24/03 - 11/16/03 12 /9i /N- 12/04/03 F0# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount BP -137 11/26/03 1,437.50 0.00 1,437.50 BP -138 12/04./03 1,925.00 0 00 1,915, 0 OL Distribution dross Amount Descrirtion :`.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.13 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) Ly of Baldwin Park Feb 10, 200+ 08.30am Page f ;yment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00 /0000 to 99/99/4999 Check /ACH #'s 14.1984 to 142128 Payment Type Check 100 -12 -5030 2,712.59 ii /24 -26/03 12/1µ4/03 101 -12- 5030 -025 650.00 11,/,24 -26JO3 12/1 -4/03 ..------------------------------------------------------------------------------.._-_--..___. -__.._-- __--- _------- ----------- - - - - -- lend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chic mate Check Amount Sep ,'092 JOHN PANIQUE AP 142011 01/29/04 25.00 '..aim# General Description 11595 REIMB *25. FORM FEE PAID FOR COMPUTER LOAN PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/28/04 25.00 0.00 -51FO CL Iliatribution 1.00 - 00µ1125 ;end# Vendor Dame ,682 KANE, BALLMER & BERKMAN laimt General Description 9-596 LEGAL SERV- NOVEMBER Pfd# Stat Contract# Invoice# 1103 -275 GL Distribution 100 -0; -5010 102 -42- 5010.014 ,'end# Vendor Name 867 KEVIN KIRKMAN '.;aim# General Description 7620 REIMS M014THLY EXP (MILEAG /MEAL.) PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 0 GL Distribution 100 -27 -5320 100 -27 -5330 1,11m# General Description -7626 REIMB MILEAGE /MEAL PO4 Stat Contract# Invoice# ri GL Distribution 100 -27 -5320 100 -27 -5330 Gross Amount Description 25.00 REIMB FEE COMPUTER LOAN Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check: Amount Sep AP 142012 01/'29104 12,32.2.25 Irrvc Dt 6ro5s Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 01/28/04 12,322.25 0.00 12,322.25 Gross Amount De5cpiptiGn 12,111.25 NOV LEGAL SERV 210.00 NOV LEGAL SERV Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 142013 01/29/04 39.46 Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Di5couni Used Net Amount 01/28/04 0100 0,00 0.00 Gross Amount Description 0.00 REIMB MILEAGE 0.00 REIMB MEAL Inve Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 01/29/04 39.96 0.00 39.96 Gross Amount Description 30.24 REIMB MILEAGE 9.72 REIMS MEAL ' . €V Accounts Payable Release 6.13 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) . y of Baldwin Park. Feb 10, 2004 0 &30am Wage 8 syment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #'s 141484 to i42128 Payment Type CPeck 4 Pave Chk Date � >,.�k A unt 'Sep f� nd# Vendor Name Remy �.. Payee Bank Ches.;# Chk Date ; ��E 7134 LOS ANGELES CLIPPERS AP 142014 01/29/04 312.50 aim# General Description 17597 DEPOSIT - PURCHASE CLIPPER GALE TICKETS 3/27/04 (TEEN CENTER TRIP) PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 0 GL Distribution 150 -00 -2172 ien& Vendor game 394 MANUEL LOZANO Invc Dt Gross Amount 01/28/04 312.50 Gross Amount Description 312.50 DEPOSIT- TICKETS Remit# Payee '.airy# General Description 1;601 HOUSING AUTH KONTHLY MTG ALLOWANCE 1/21/04 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 10389 O 0 GL Distribution 192 -01 -5000 -014 PO Liquidation 102 -01 -5900 -014 `end# Vendor Game 594 MANUEL LOZANO Invc Dt Gross Amount 01/28/01 50.00 Gross Amount Description 50.00 1/21/04 NTG Amount 50.00 Remit# Payee '.aim# General Description ;7602 FINANCE RUTH MONTHLY KTG ALLOW 11211% PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 10384 0 0 GL Distribution 100 -81 -5000 PC Liquidation 100-81 -5000 rend# Vendor Name 65 MARLEN GARCIA [aim# General Description ;7599 HOUSJNG RUTH NTG ALLOW 01121104 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 10390 O 0 GL Distribution 102 -01- 5000 -014 PO Liquidation 102 - 01-5000 -014 Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0.00 312.50 Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 1420*15 0*1/29/04 50.00 Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0.00 50.00 Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 142016 01/29/04 50.00 Y Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 01/28/04 50.00 0.00 50.00 Gass Amount Description 50.00 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2003/2004t FINANCING AUTHORITY MEETING ALLOWANCE Amount 50.00 Remit# Payee Invc Dt Grow Amount 02/28/04 50.00 Gross Amount Description 50.00 MTG 01/21/04 Amount 50.00 Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount .Sep AP 142017 01/29/04 50.00 Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0.00 50.00 FtF Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) '.ty of Baldwin Park Feb 10, 2004 08.30am Page 9 ,vinent History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/IW10/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /AW 's 141984 to 142128 Payment Type Check ?eqd# Vendor Name. 765 MARLEN GARCIA '.aim# General Description ;7'398 REIMB-DSL LINE SEPTEMBER- DECEMBER P0# Stat Conta�act# Invoice# 0 GL Distribution 131 -1ti•- 5430 -064 Remit# Payee Rar?k ...Check# Chk Date Check Amount Seta AP 142018 111/29/04 -139.80 Y Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 01%28/04 1.39.80 0.00 139.80 Gross Amount Description 134.80 REIMS DSL SEPT -DEC rend# Vendor Dame Remit# Payee 2765 MARLEN GARCIA aim# General Description ;1600 FINANCE AUTH MONTHLY MTG ALLOW 1/21/04 Pit# Stat Contract# Invoice# 10385 0 0 GL Distribution 100 - 81-5000 PO Liquidation 100 -81 -5000 Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 142019 01/29/04 50.00 Y Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 01/28/04 50.00 0.00 50.00 Gross Amount Description 50.00 MTG 1/21/04 Amount 511.00 ?eTi�df# Vendor. Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7080 PUCK ACEDO AP 142020 01!29/04 5,800.00 aim# General Description 11625 N- ERGENCY GRANT BATHROOM REPAIRS 3128 MAINE AVE PO# Stai contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 031128/04 5,000.00 0.00 5,010.00 GL Distribution Grass Amount Description 12043 - 5030-091 5,000.00 3128 MAINE AV ft:rd# Vendor Name 1116 PATRICIA GLiZ�SAN 8Tm#1 General Description 7609 RE.IMB MONTHLY EXPENSES P09 Stat Contract# Invoice# 0 GL Distribution 10242 -5320 -014 102- 42-5330 -014 Remit# Payee Bank Chec4 Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 142021 01/29/04 29x68 Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 01/28%04 29.68 0.130 29.68 Gross Amount Description 20.00 REIMS PRKG 9.68 REIMS SUPPLIES HUD MTG :S.rP Accounts Payahie Release 6,1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) tIV of Baldwin Park Feb 10, 2004 08r30am Page 10 !4!gent History. Bann AP Payment Bates 00 /00 /0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #'w 141994 to 142128 Payment Type Check ` rrd #Vender lama 1r mi t k Payee Check Amount r OCfs 364 PERS - RETIREMENT - AP 142022 01/29/04 1,821.39 dlml General Description 17603 RETIREMENT PP #01 P /E: 01/03/04 SVC PER: 01 -04 -3 * *PART TIME EMPLYS ** PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 0 GL Distribution 100 -00 -2205 100 - 00--2223 fe•rd# Vendor Name 864 PERS - RETIREMENT Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 01/26/04 1,621.39 0.00 1,921.39 Gross Amount Description 1,750.71 PP #01 1/3/04 SRV 01 -0 /, -3 70,66 PP #01 1/3104 SRV 01--04µ3 Remit# Payee aim# General Description ; 1604 SUPPLEMENTAL RETRO CKS FOR RETIREMENT PP #02 P /E. 01/17/04 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# O GL Distribution 100 -00 -2205 100 -00 -2305 'end# Vendor Game 964 PERS - RETIREMENT Bank Check# Chk Bate Check Amount 'Sep AP 142023 01/29/04 462.23 Y Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used het Amount 0:1/28/04 462.23 0.00 462.23 Gross Amount Description 161.16 RETRO RETIREMENT PP #02 P /E: 01/17/04 301.07 RETRO RETIREMENT PP 902 P /E: 01/17/04 Remit# Payee aim# General Description 17605 RETIREMENT /SUPPLEMENTAL FOR RETRO CHECKS PP #01 P /E: 01/03/04 SVC PER; 01 -04 -3 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 0 GL Distribution 100 -00 -2205 9,00 -00 -2305 �er,d# Vendor Name 864 PERS- RETIREMENT Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 142024 01/29/04 1,555.99 Y Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 01/28/04 1,555.99 0.00 1,555.99 Gross Amount Description 462.40 SUPPLEMENT RETRO CKS #01 01/3/04 1,093.59 SUPPLEMENT RETRO CXS #01 01/3/% Remit# Payee alm# General Description 7606 RETIREMENT SUPPLEMENTAL FOR RETRO CHECKS PP 424 P /E< 12/20/03 SVC PER: 12 -034 Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 142025 01129/04 1,017.66 Y PO# Stat Contract# Invoice#' Invc Dt 6ro55 Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 0-1/26/04 1,017.66 0.00 1,017.68 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 100 -00 -2205 563.14 SPLMNT RETRO PP 424 12/20/03 SV 12 -03 -4 100 - 00.2305 454.54 SPLMNT RETRO PP924 12120/03 SV 12 -03 -4 ;S,AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) .tyof8aidpoinPark Feb 10, 2004 88:30am Page 1i iyment History. Ronk AP Payment Dates 00/00/0080 to 99/99 /9999 Oeck/A0K'a 14198� to 142128 Payment Type Check _________________________________________________________________________ /end# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check.8 Chk0ahy Check Amount Sep 864 PERS- ETIBEMENT AP 142026 01/29/04 3.245.34 Y aim# General Description �687 RETIREMENT 9P418 P/E: 08-0-83 SVC PER: 88-83-5 **PART TIME EMPLYS* GLDistidmtim 100-00-2205 Fend# Vendor Name 364 PERS-RETIREMENT lmc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Het Amount 01/28/04 3,245.34 0.0O 3,245.34 Gross Amount Description 3.153.27 PP#18 08-30-83 SRV 08-83-5 P/T B1PLYS 92.07 PP%18 08-30-00 SRV 88-83-5 P/T EMPLYS Remit# Payee uLot 6ene» l Description �608 RETIREMENT PP#02 P/E; 01117104 SVC PER: 01-04-4 GL Distribution f00-60-2223 1:�nd# Vendor Name Bank0heckg Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 142027 01/29/04 73,587,7B Y Imn Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 01/28/04 73,587.78 U.8D 73.587.78 Gross Amount Description 33.008.93 PP#02 P/E: 01/17/0� SRV 01-044 183.21 PP402 P/E/ 01/17/04 SRV 01-04-4 40.395,84 PFI02 FYE: 01/17/04 SRV 01-04-4 Remit# Payee aim# General Description '7611 REIMB MILEME "POLICE STRATEGIC PLANNING" SEMI14AR PO#StatOm+aacf# lmmice# 6L D15tiibution 'end# Vendor Name Inve Dt Gross Amount 01/2B/04 39.96 Gross Amount Deucalption 39.96RBMB MILEAGE Refflit# Payee aim% General Description :7612 FINANCE AUTH MONTHLY MTG ALLOWANCE 01/21/04 Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP IQ028 01/2910� 39.96 Discount Amt Discount Used Met Amount 0.00 39.96 Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 142029 01/419/04 50,00 PO# Sfa| Contra f# Immice# lmc 3t 6eosa Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 1.0386 O 0 01/28/04 50.08 0.00 5O.O0 GL Distribution 6ro55 Mount 0e5cniption 100-81-5008 50.00MTGO1/21/04 P0 Liquidation Amount 100-81-5000 50.00 �.AP Accounts Payable ��eaae 6.1� N*APR708 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) I / of Baldwin Park Feb 10, 2004 08:30am Page 12 F•Frent History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99%9994 Check /ACHV5 '141984 to 142128 Payment Type Check (e`,d# Vendor Mame Rem it# Payee Bank Check# Chk DatQ ra,e�ck Amount yep 3495 RICARDO PACHECO AP 142030 01/29104 50.00 Y airs# General Description 11613 HOUSING AUTH NTG ALLOW 01/21/04 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt 6roz5 Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 10391 0 0 01/28/04 50.00 0.00 50.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 102 -01 -5000 -014 50.100 HOUSING AUT MTG 01 /21/04 PO Liquidation Amount 10201--5000 -014 50.00 end# Vendor Dame Remit# Payee 35101 RIVERSIDE CO FAIR & NATIONAL DATE Sank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 142031 01/29/04 225.00 P4# General Description 7610 PURCHASE TICKETS SR CITIZEN TRIP 2/19/04 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/28/04 225.00 0.00 225.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 1501- 002169 225.00 FAIR TICKETS 2/19/04 'end# Vendor Name Remit# Payee 075 SANCHEZ RESTAURANT aim# General Description ,7514 DEPOSIT -FOOD FOR SR VALENTINES DANCE 02/12/02 Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 142032 01/29/04 200.00 PO4 Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Grass Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/28/04 200.00 0.00 200.00 GL Distribution Grass Amount Description 100 °73 -5210 200.00 FOOD VALENTINES DANCE 'end# Vendor /dame Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 1958 SCANPH AP 142033 01/29/04 175.00 ai.m# General Description 76M MEMBERSHIP DUES FY 2003--04 DOLORES GONZALEZ -HAVES PO# Stat Contract'* Invoice# Invc Dt gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01!28/04 175.00 0.00 175.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 102 -42- 5240 -014 175.00 DUES -D HAVES :SAP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N %-APR71:01 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) Iy or Baldwin Park Feb 10, 2004 08:30am Page 13 :;"Rent History. Banks AP Payment hates 00 /00 /0000 to 99/99/9999 Check4 /ACH #`s 141984 to 142128 Payment Tyce Check; 'end# Vendor- farm: Rer.it# Payee Bank Check# Chk. Date Ch e& Sep :3387 SHARON RIVERA AP 142034 01/29/04 265.91 ,im# General Description ;7618 REIM PURCHASE OF RAFFLE GIFTS FOR 2004 ENPLY REC DINNER PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01%28/04 265.91 0.00 265.91 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description Gross Amount 140 -•00 -2176 150.00 REIMB 6IFTS -04 REC DINNER 100 -73 -5210 100 -81 -5330 115.91 REUNB GIFTS-04 REC DINNER ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- `end# Vendor Name Remmit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep -,84 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION FUEL T AP 1421035 01/29/04 259.06 :114 General Description 17615 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK MAINT FEE OCT -DEC 2003 A /C# 44- 009874 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# O GL Distribution 20 -58 -5210 'end# Vendor Name 1135 TINY'S TROUPERS Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 01/28/04 259.06 0.00 25906 Gross Amount Description 259.06 OCT -DEC '03 STORAGE TANK FEE Remit# Payee aim# General Description ;7617 ENTERTAINMENT SR VALENTINE'S DANCE 02/12/04 Bank; Check# Chk Coate Check Amount Sep AP 142036 01/24/04 200.00 PO# Stai Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Aunt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/28/04 200.00 0.00 200.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 100 -73 -5210 200.00 ENTERTAINMENT VALENTINES DANCE 'end# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Checkt Chk Date Check Amount Sep 6247 EMAE INTERNATIONAL AP 142040* 0:1/29/04 60,025.49 aim# General Description :7637 CONST- CENTRAL. PARK WEST TEEN CENTER CIP 829 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc. Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 10665 0 720 12/311,03 36,225.49 10.00 36,225.44 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 120 -53- 5020-824 36,225.44 I EA CONSTRUCT FENCE, ARBOR, IRRIGATION AND LANDSCAPE ALONG DALTON WASH P TEEN CENTER/SKATE PARK PROJECT SITE, CIP 829 PO Liquidation 120 -53- 5020 -824 Amount 36,225.44 ai.m# General Description 7638 CONSTRUCT CENTRAL PARK WEST -TEEN CENTER CIP 829 POI Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used 11.023 C 720 12/31/03 23,80U.00 0.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description :'5.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 Net Amount 23,800.00 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) cy of Baldwin Park Feb 10, 2004 08:30am Page 14 ;M.ent History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00 /0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #`s i41Q84 to 1-42128 Payment Type Check 120-53 - 5020 -829 23,800.00 1 EA CONSTRUCTION OF CENTRAL PART( WEST TEEN CENTER AND SKATE PARK, CIP 829 PQ Li u dation AmouP t 120-53 -5020 -829 23,800.00 ' =-nd# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 1,139 ADC TECH, INC. AP 142042# 02/03/04 94.25 ai.m# General Description ;7039 10 ROLLS -BLANK THERMAL TRANSFER LABELS PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 02/02/04 94.25 94.25 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 1970 -24 -5210 94.25 THERMAL TRANSFER LABEL; `,nd# Vendor Name 5282 AT &T WIRELESS Remit# Payee ai.m# General Description :7640 CELL PH USE 23657257-09.2151825197- 33.52 55640304- 51.38 PO# Stat Contract#' Invoice# 10383 O 0 GL Distribution 131 -14- 5430 -064 131 -14- 5430 -064 131.14 - 5430 -064 PO Liquidation 131 -14 -5430 -064 Funk Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 142043 02/03/04 184.11 Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used 12/26/03 184.11 Gross Amount Description 99.21 23657257 33.52 51825107 51.38 55640304 Amount 184.11 Net Amount .184.1.1 e;14 Vendor Dame Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount ;yep 5063 BERLITZ LANGUAGES, INC, AP 142044 02 /03/04 1097.00 aim# General Description 17641 BILINGUAL TESTING A OCEGUEDA E ATENCIO PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 001612 03 -00094 11/06/03 100.00 100.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 100 -15 -5000 50.00 A OSEGUEDA 100 -15 -5000 50.00 E ATENCIO iS-AP Accounts Payable Release 4.13 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) ry of Baldwin Park Feb 10, 2004 08.30am Page '15 110nt History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/10000 to 99/99/9990 Cheek /ACH #`s 141984 to 142128 Payment Type Check aE d# Ven dor Name R �,.,� 411 Payee vas Che.kj Chk Date Check ,unt Sep 136 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS AP 142045 02/03/04 1,371.33 a.-m# General Description 742 XEROX PAPER PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11041 C 292884 12/23/03 961.26 481.28 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 131-14-5210-062 961.26 40 CT #PIOX9001 XEROX PAPER, 8.5X11, 20LB, WHITE PO Liquidation Amount M-44-51M-062 961.26 aim# General Description 7843 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Inv,- Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 10995 O 554324 01/14/04 70.55 70.55 6558747 01/14/04 1.76 1.76 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 102 42 -5210 -014 72.31 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2003/20044 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES NOT AVAILABLE THROUGH CENTRAL STORES, FEDERALLY ASSISTED HOUSING PORTION 120 -43 -5210 -030 0,00 1 EA CDBG PORTION PO Liquidation Amount 0 -42- 5210 -014 72.31. •aim# General Description :7644 PAPER Phi# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used filet Amount 10996 C 944108 12/02/03 228.09 228.09 GL Dist;cibufion Gross Amount Description 100 -12 -5210 228.09 10 CT #P69511 -002CE C014 IfiUOUS FEED PAPER, 9.5X7.1, 204 PO Liquidation Amount 100 -12 -5210 228.09 aim# General Description '7645 SUPPLIES PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 454994 GL Distribution 100-02 -5210 100 -41 -5210 100 -15 -5210 Invc Dt Gross Amount 01/08/04 104.67 Gross Amount Description 36.55 SUPPLIES 36.56 SUPPLIES 36.56 SUPPLIES Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 1019.87 ;'- -'.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 14 *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) Ev of Baldwin Park Fels 10, 2004 08.30am Page 16 y::ent History Bank AP Payment Gates 0010010000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACHVF, 141984 to 1 228 Payment Type Chheck 'Henn q'C ldor Name Remit# Pa;,ne Bank Che&# Chk Data. Check Amount Sep? 61.37 BURRO CANYON JRC ASSOICATES, RAC. AP 142046 02/03/04 210.110 ai.m# General Description :7646 RANGE FEES PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 435 GL Distribution 106 -25 -5340 en d# Vendor Name 1`141 CCPOA Invc Dt Gr =ass Amount 12/18/03 210.00 Gross Amount Description 210.00 RANGE FEES Remit# Payee aim# General Description 7648 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL LILIANA RUBIO MARICELA MONTENEGRO PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 0 GL Distribution 100 -25 -5240 'end# Vendor Name 1.40 CITY OF SAN FER14ANDO Invc Dt Gross Amount 02/02/04 60.00 Gross Amount Description 60.00 RUBIO, MONTENEGRO Remit# Payee aim# General Description 647 DUES -MIKE MADRID (MUNI EQUIP MAINT ASSOC) PO4 Stat Contract# Invoice# 04 -1.57 GL Distribution 130 -58 -5240 end# Vendor fume 2772 DANKA OFFICE IMAGING COMPANY Invc Dt Gross Amount 02/02/04 50.00 Gross Amount Description 50.00 DUES -MIRE MADRID Remit# Payee ai # General Description 7649 MAINT SERV 01/01/04- 03/31/04 A /C# 188542 Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 210.80 Bank Check#' Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 142047 02/03/04 60 00 Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 60.00 Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount 'yep AP 142048 02/03/04 50.00 Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 50.00 Bank C" "heck# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 142049 0/03/04 3,150.50 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invr_ Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 10334 O 7009235044 01/03/04 2,107.75 2,107.75 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 131 -14- 5260 -062 0.00 1 EA *'ANNUAL- FY2003I00 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT FOR CANON IR330E & IR330E.S COPIERS (S #NNX01175 POLICE, S #NNX01277 HOUSING & S #NOJ59754 30 FLOOR ADMIN) INCLUDES: TONER, DRUM, DEVELOPER, PARTS & LABOR - QUARTERLY BILLING CYCLE 231 -14- 5260 -060 2,107.75 1 EA MAINTENANCE CONTRACT FOR CATION IR600 (S #NLEO4486 PRINT SHOP) INCLUDES, TONER, DRUM, DEVELOPER, PARTS & LABOR - QUARTERLY BILLING CYLE PO Liquidation Amount 1.31. -14- 5260 -060 2,107.75 aim# General Description 7650 COPIER 14AINT 04L/01/04- 03/31/04 A /C# 188542 O.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) tv of Saldv& Park Feb 10, 2004 08:30am Page 17 ;k;ent History. °ank AP Payment Dates 00 /0D /OCIl0 to 91/49/9999 ChecklACH #`s 141984 to 142128 Payment Type Check PO# Stat Contract# Injjv�oice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount �f3371. r3. 700935042 Ar T J C1 -iOv; v'4- 1'yT'G..75' GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 131 -14- 5260 -062 1,042.75 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2003/00 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT FOR CANON IR330E & IR330E5 COPIERS tS #NNX01175 POLICE, S#NNX01277 HOUSING & S #NOJ59754 3RD FLOOR ADMINI INCLUDES: TONER, DRUM, DEVELOPER, PARTS & LABOR - QUARTERLY BILLING CYCLE 131 -14- 5260 -D6O O.00 1 EA MAINTENANCE CONTRACT FOR CANON IR600 (S #NLE04486 PRINT SHOP) INCLUDES: TONER, DRUM, DEVELOPER, PARTS & LABOR - QUARTERLY BILLING CYLE PO Liquidation Amount 131 -14- 5260 °062 1,042.75 end# Vendor Name :297 DEPT, OF CORONER rimI# General Description 1651 AUTOPSY REPORTS PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 143 GL Distribution 100-24 -5000 end# Vendor Name 313 DOOLEY ENTERPRISES, INC. aim# General Description 7652 AMMUNITION PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 35323 GL Distribution 100 -23 -521.0 end# Vendor Name 1:180 DURHAM TRANSPORTATION aim# General Description '7653 TRANSPORTATION (MAGIC POT) Remit# Payee Invc Dt Gross Amount 01/09/04. 78.00 Gross Amount Description 78.00 AUTOPSY REPORTS Remit# Payee Invc Dt Gross Amount 01/15/04 3,872.54 Gross Amount Description 3,872.54 AMMUNITION Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 142050 02/93/04 78,00 Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 78.00 Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 142051 02/03/04 3,872.54 Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 3,87'.54 Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 142052 02/03/04 1,1-15.72 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11066 C 0602; 11/30/03 551.10 551.10 0216066 12/1"1.x'03 564.62 $64.62 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 117 -55- 5000 -055 1,115.72 1 EA TRANSPORTATION PROVIDED FOR YOUTH TRIP TO MAGIC MOUNTAIN, INVOICE #01216027 & #€3216066 PO Liquidation Amount 117- 55-50100 -1355 1,115.72 S.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) ity of Baldwin Parr Feb 10, 2004 08:30am Page 18 -1 rent History. Bank AP Payment Gate 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /A%F� #'s 1419184 to 142128 Payment Tyre Check d� vendor Name Remit* Payee Nnk Check# Chk Date Check Amount Seer s =385 EMPHASYS COMPUTER SOLUTIONS AP 142053 02/03/04 3,092.24 iai€r# General Description 7654 TRAVEL EXPENSES FOR COMPUTER TRAINER P0# Stat Contract# Invoice# 01635 01786 GL Distribution 102 -42- 5260 -014 ,'Endti Vendor lame 348 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP Eai,# General Description )7655 EXPRESS MAIL TRXG# 834923756865 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 1 -520- 8242 GL Distribution 100 -52 -5210 Invc Dt Gross Amount 12%23/03 1,490.04 12/30/03 1,602.20 Gross Amount Description 3,042.24 TRAVEL FOR TRAINER Remit# Payee Invc Dt 5ross Amount 12/26/03 19.86 Gross Amount Description 14.86 834923756865 Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 1,490.04 1,602.20 Bank Check# C,hk [gate Check Amount Sep AP 142054 02/03/04- 132.27 Discount Amt Discount Used aim# General Description (656 EXPRESS MAIL TRKG# 843267609313 (1-520 - 39837) 843267609335 843267609368 8/x3267609379 (1 -521- 16561) PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 1- 5211•-39837 1- 521 -16661 GL Distribution 100 -12 -5210 100-:12 -5210 100 -12 -5210 100 - 12-5210 Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt miscount Used 12119103 22,72 01/02/04 89.69 Gross Amount Description 22.72 843267610306 (1--520-39837) 20.54 843267609335 (1- 521 - -16661) 50.80 843267609368 (1°-521- 16661) 18.35 843267609379 (1- 521 - 16661) end# Vendor Name Remit# Payee 2687 FRA14CHISE TAX BOARD VEHICLE RE6IST aim# General Description 7693 ACCT# 1F75994020031 RAY PAQUIN SS# 565 - 084970 PO# Stat Contracts Invoice# 1F7599420031 GL Distribution 100--00-2231 Invc Dt Grass Amount 01/08!04 113.00 Gross Amount Description 113.00 R PAQUIN Net Amount 19.86 Met Amount 22.72 89.69 Funk Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 142055 02/03/04 113.00 Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 113.00 ;.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) tvof Baldvoin Park Feb 10, 2004 08:30am Page 19 �yment History. Bank AP PaymentDe6es 00/00K0WO to Y/99/9999 CheoklACH#'o 1+198� to 142128 Payment T.Y.DeCheck ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 'end# Vendor Name 8��t4 Payee Bank Chackt Chk Date Check Amount 5--jp '.906 GENERAL LAND& TREE TRIM INC AP 142056 02/03/04 300.00 aim# 6enex l 0eec iptiom �-7657 JANUARY MONTHLY MAINT PD# Stat Contna t# lmmicet ]nvc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 10668 0 40120 01/23/04 300.00 300'00 6L Distribution Gross Amount Description 10242-6030-013 300.00 1 EA *ANNUAL-R2003/2004* LANDSCAPING SERVICES @ MCNElL MANOR PC) Liquidation Amount 102-42-5000-013 308.00 __________________________________________________________________________ 'cnd# Vendo» Name Remitt Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep ,,493 GRAND PR}NTlRG AP 142057 02/03/04. 219.65 aim# GcneraL Description 7658 EVIDENCE/PROPERTY TAG PO# StafContxact4lnvoice4 2nve0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount U�5ed Net Amount 16793 *1/Wo� 20.65 210,65 GL 0istrlbmtion Gross Amount Description 100-24-5210 210.65 EVIDENCE/PROPERTY TAG __________________________________________________________________________ 'cnd# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 4.666 HA14B0N INVESTIGATION & BACKGROUND AP W058 02/03/04 892.08 o�m� Gener l Deac i��m �7659 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION PO#StatCmtract#Immice# BP O�-105 6L Distribution �end# Vendor Name 6971 HILLSIDES uim# General Description '7668 NOVEMBER SERVICES Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 01/05/04 8Q.08 892.08 Gross Amount Description 892.08 BACKGROUND 114VEST16ATlON Remit# Payee BankQeck# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP iQ039 02/93/04 340.6� PO# Staf Cnntn ctW lnvo cl-4 Imc 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 10796 0 0 02d02/04 340.64 JO.64 6L Distribution 6mns Amount Description 20-43-5050-140 34-0.6� i EA *ANNUAL-FY2003/2004* GROUP COUNCELING SESSIONS P0 Liquidation Amount 1043-5050-140 J40.84 :S.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 MmA9R708 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) .iy of Baldwin Paris Feb 10, 21704 08:30am Page 20 ,yment History. Bank AP Payment Gates 00 /00 /0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #'a 1419134 to 142128 Payment Type Check -rjd# Vendor Name '9 5 IN11 CODE COUNCIL, INC. aims General Description 1661 REFERENCE GUIDE POI Stat Contract# Invoice# 077.3 &94 gL Distribution 10046 -5240 send# Vendor Name 510 JET RESEARCH LAB INC aim# general Description :7662 PRINTER REPAIR PO# ;tat Contract# Invoice# 41193 GL Distribution 131-13 -5210 a;im# General Description ;7664 LASERJET REPAIRS PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 41161 41162 GL Distribution 131 -13 -5210 Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 142060 02/03/04 32.05 Invr_ Dt gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12/26/03 32,05 32.05 Gross Amount Description 32.05 REFERENCE GUIDE Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 142061 112/03/04 338.66 Invr Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12/31/03 75.00 75.00 Gross Amount Description 75.00 PRINTER REPAIR Invc Di gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12/29/03 188.66 188.66 12/29/03 75.00 75,00 Gross Amount Description 263.66 REPAIRS 'end# Vendor Name Remit# Payee 2311 MUST REWARDS aim# general Description 7663 RIDESHARE PROGRAM GIFT CERTIFICATES PO# Stat Contra&& Invoice## 2312.2i3 GL Distribution 109 -45 -5335 Sank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 142062 02/03/04 826.00 Invc Dt GrO55 Amount Discount Amt miscount Used Net amount 12/30/03 826.00 826.011 Gross Amount Description 8[6.00 GIFT CERT- RMESHARE PRG 'Elnd# Vendor Nave Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Cheek Amount Sep v '1 KIMBERLY A PALMER AP 142063 02103/04 56.00 ai.m# General Description 7665 TRANSCRIPTION SERV PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount BP % -01 01/15/04 56.00 56.00 GL Distributions gross Amount Description 100-21 -5000 56.00 TRANSCRIPTIONS S..AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 W-APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) ty of Baldwin Park Feb 10, 2004 08:30am Page 21 ryment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00 /0010000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #`s 141984 to 142128 Payment Type Check +erid# Vendor Flame. Remy t# Payee Bank Check# CKR Date Check Amount S,ep. 533 KLEPI KRAFT UNIFORM SUPPLY AP 142064 02J03/04 963.95 a m General Description 17666 EUNIFORM ?DENTAL -DEC PO# Sfat Contracf# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 10534 O 176869 12/02/03 44.64 44.64 177842 12''09/03 44.64 44.64 178937 12/16/03 112.89 112.89 180343 12/23/93 4.64 44.64 180984 12/30/03 44.64 44.64 176871 12/02/03 79.40 79.40 177844 12/09/03 65.40 65.90 178939 12/16/03 65.90 65.90 180045 12/23/03 65.40 65.90 20986 12/30/03 65.90 65.90 176870 12/02/03 65.40 65.90 177843 12/09/03 65.90 65.90 178938 12/16/03 65.90 65.90 180044 12/23/03 65.40 65.90 180985 12/30103 65.90 65.90 GL Distribution Grass Amount Description 100 -57 -52:10 144.59 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2003/2004* RENTAL OF UNIFORMS FOR PUBLIC WORKS DEPT, MAINTENANCE ADMINISTRATION PORTION 100 -64 -5210 86.76 1 EA GRAB PORTION 114 -59- 5210 -094 46.40 1 EA TRAFFIC CONTROL PORTION 114 -•61- 5210-044 67.48 1 EA ASPHALT PORTION 117 -69- 5210 -052 38.56 1 EA TRANSIT FACILITY MAINTENANCE PORTION 121 - 65-5210 77.12 1 EA TREES PORTION 121 -66 -5210 28.90 1 EA IRRIGATION PORTION 121 -67 -5210 67.48 1 EA COURT REFERRAL PORTION 121 -68 -5210 1134.95 1 EA LANDSCAPE PORTION 124- 54-5210 -049 14.28 1 EA MAINTENANCE ADMINISTRATION - ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PORTION 129 -63 -5210 -873 106.03 1 EA STREET SWEEPING PORTION 130 - 58-5210 46.40 1 EA STREET SWEEPING PORTION PO Liquidation Amount 100 -57 -5210 144.59 100- 64-M5210 86.76 114 -59- 5210 -094 96.40 114 -61- 5210 -094 67.48 117 -69- 5210 -052 38.56 121 - 65-5210 77.12 121 -66 -5210 28.90 121 -67 -5210 67.48 121- 68-5210 13435 129 -54 -5210 -049 14.28 129-63-5210--873 106.03 170 - 58-5210 96.40 ;'_.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SA14DRA A (SANDRAi is Of Baldwin Park Feb 10, 2004 08.30am Page 22 !vment History, Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Chteck /ACK's 141984 to 142128 Payment Type Check 1-4 Vendor fame K'P.Mi ift Payee Fang' C-eck# Chk Date Check. Amount S --Y. 738 L.B. HAYHURST & ASSOCIATES AP 142065 02/03/04 133.64 t:im# General Description 668 COMMUNITY DEV EXECUTIVE SEARCH P09 Stat Contract# Invoice# 03 -153 GL Distribution 100 -15 -5000 Fend: Vendor fume ,Q LACUNA CLAY CO. , -341 General Description )f667 SUPPLIES PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 17150 GL Distribution 150 - 00-2172 'end# Vendor Name 160 LEWIS ENGRAVING aim# General Description 17469 DATER STAMP PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 0127.32 GL Distribution 100 -25- -5210 Invc Dt dross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12/29/03 133.64 133,64 Gross Amount Description 133.64 COMM DEV EXEC Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 142066 02/03/04 47.63 Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12/10/03 47,63 X7.63 Gross Amount Description 47.63 SUPPLIES Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 142067 02/03/04 33.77 Invc Dt Grass Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 01/21/04 33.77 33.77 Gross Amount Description 33.77 RATER STAMP send# Vendor game Remit# PayeE 3168 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 142063 02/03/04 168.00 aim# General Description 7670 E14PLOYMENT RELATIONS CONSORTIUM TRAINING 01/21/04 M CARRILL, M MORENO, S RUELAS, M PICAZO, M DOZMATI, S THOMPSON PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 02/02/04 168.00 168.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 100 -71 -5330 28.00 M CARRILLO 1 /21/04 100 - 72-5330 28.00 M MORENO 120-43- 5330-030 28.00 S RUELAS 10148 - 5340 -0120 28.00 M PICAZO 120 -47- 5340 -031 28.00 M DOZMATI 100 -02 -5330 28.00 S THOMPSON ;`.,_AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) .ty of Baldwin Park Feb 19, 2004 08:30am Page 23 ?yment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/99" Ctreck /ACH #`s 141984 to 142128 Payment Type Check rend# Vendor Name Remi.t#. Payee Bank Checkg Chk Elate Check Amount `we„ 379 LONG BEACH UNIFORM AP 142069 02/03/04 709.75 ,;im# General Description i7673 UNIFORM, SUPPLIES PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 11095 C 18 19 GL Distribution 100 -23 -5210 PO Liquidation 100 -23 -5210 f£.nd# Vendor Name 08 MCI aim# General Description ;7671 FEBRUARY SERVICE A /C# XU55795 PO# Stat Contract4 IInvo7 )ice## 17634282 GL Distribution 131-14- 5430 -064 fend# Vendor game x,60 NEG`POST LEASING aim# General Description i7672 MAILPRO LEASE 01/31104 - 02/26104 Invc Dt Grass Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 10/21/03 335.87 335.87 10/25/03 373,88 373.88 Gross Amount Description 709.75 1 EA PAYMENT OF INVOICE #573239 & 573236 UNIFORM SUPPLIES FOR TRAFFIC BUREAU OFFICERS Amount 709.75 Remit# Payee Bank Ctreck# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 142070 02/03/04 596.50 Invc [it Gross Amount 01/01/04 546.50 Grass Amount Description 596.50 FEB SERV Remmit# Payee Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 596.50 Bank Ctreck# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 142071 02103104 688.57 PO4 Siat Contract# Invoice# Invc Ut Gross Amount Miscount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 10337 0 3378824 12/31/03 688.57 688.57 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 131-14- 5760 -061 688.57 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2003104* MUNICIPAL LEASE PROGRAM PAYMENTS FOR MAIL PRO 77,40/2 (S 477400321) LEASE #97412080 PO Liquidation Amount 131-14- 5760 -061 688.57 .. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------.------------------------- .---------- - - - - -- +ePd# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep '_ 286 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS AP 142072 02/03/04 594.87 Sim# General Description H'674 CELT. PH USE- PUBLIC WORKS 12/04/03- 01/03/04 A /C# 862686311 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 10540 O 862466311 -025 GL Distribution 100 - 51-5210 Invc Di Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 01/06/04 594.87 594.87 Gross Amount Description 71.38 1 EA *ANNUAL•- FY20L0/2004* CELLULAR PHONES FOR PUBLIC WORKS DEPT, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR PORTION 100-57-5210 148.72 1 EA MAINTENANCE ADMINISTRATION PORTION 114--61° 5210 -094 47,59 1 EA ASPHALT PORTION 117 -69- 5210 -052 47,59 1 EA TRANSIT FACILITY MAINTENANCE PORTION :' .AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) ty of Baldwin Park Feb 10, 2001 08:30am Page 24 /yscnt History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0080 to 99/9919999 C6eck/ACH#'o 1408f to 142128 Payment Type Check 118-64-5210-056 89.2�1EAGRAB PORTION 12����5218 71.38 1 EA LANDSCAPE PORTION 129-5�-5210-873 71.38 1 EA MAINTENANCE ADMINISTRATION ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PORTION 1313-58-5219 47.59 i EA FLEET SERVICES PORTION P0 Liquidation Amount 100-51-5210 71.38 00-57-521Q l48.72 114-61-5218-094 47.59 117-60-3218-052 47.59 118-64-5210-056 89.24 121-68-5210 71.38 129-54'5210-873 71.38 130+58-5210 47.59 ________________________________________________________________________ 'end� Vendor Name Rcmit% Payee Bank Cherkt Chk Date Check Amount Sep S286 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS AP 142073 0203/04 231.40 Y aim# General Description J�75 DECEMBER SERVICES A/C# 932287317-025 PO# Stat Dmtract# Immice# lnm 0t Gro*a Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 932287317-025 1204/03 231.40 231.40 6L 0isfni6miloo Gross Amount Description 131-14-5�30-064 231.4@ DEC SERV ________ -------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- __ 'und# Vendor Name Remit& Payee Bank Chedk# Cbk Date Check Amount Sep 728 SE0RlTAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, l AP 142074 02/83/04 5,604.80 u�m� 6ener l Deacob��oo PO#StatContract#lnvoice# lnvc Dt Gros5 Amount Discount Amt Discount8zed Net Amount 10456 0 W0011261 01/03/04 890.40 890.40 GL Distribution Gross Amount 0e5cription 117-55-500-055 890.40 12/19/03-01/1/04 |,O Liquidation Amount 117-55'500-053 890.A0 uim# Genepal De5criptioa �7685 SRV-TEEN CENTER 12Y19V03-81/01/0� CUST%1003358552 PO4 StatCon�ract4]nvoicel }nvcDt Gposs Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11093 0 140011240 01/03/�O 1'206.80 1`:)06,8G 6L Distribution Gross Amount Deacoiption 132-16-5080 1,206.80 1 [A *ANNUAL-FY2003/04* SECURITY SERVICES AT THE TEEN CENTER P0 Liquidation Amount 132-16-58O0 1,206.80 '17689 SECURITY-TEEN CENTER PO#Stat Confpacf#]nvoicel lnvc0t Gposs Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11093 O 826332 11/21/03 2,392.15 2,3V2,15 W355 12/05/03 1,128.45 1.120.45 GL Distribution ` Gross Amount 0eacniption 'S'AP Accounts Payable Release 6.13 N*APR730 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) tyofBaldflioPark Feb 10,200� 08."Admi Page 25 nment History. Bank AP Paymept Dates 00/0O/0008to 99/99/9999 Check/ACH#'s 14194 to 142128 Payment Type Check 132-16-5800 3.512.60 1 EA *ANNUAL-FY2003/0 * SECURITY SERVICES AT THE TBE14 CENTER P0 Liquidation Amount 132-16-5008 3`512.60 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- /emdf Vemdoc [lame Remit�, Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7143PR06RESSlVE BUSINESS PUBLICATIONS AP 1075 02/03/04 299.00 ,m# 6eneo l Description '7677 SUBSCRIPTION HENNIE APODACA PO# Stat Contract# lnvoice# InveDt Gross Amount Discount Amt Di5count Used Net Amount 0302270� 12/24/83 299.00 299.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 100-12-52A] 29q,00 HENNlE APOD#CA ------------------------------------------------------------------------- /end# Vendo» Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sap 3226 PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERFRlS AP 142O76 02/03/04 2.500.00 o�mt General Deac iptiow �7676 JANUARY SERVICES PO4 sfat Confnn {# Irivo ce4 Imvc 0t 6rvmm Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 1068V 0 0 02/02/0� 2,500J0 2`500.00 GL Diatojbution Gross Amount Description 120-43-5050-159 2.500,00 1 EA *A@NUAL-FY2003/2004, CHOICES PROGRAM PO Liquidation Amount 120'f3-5050-159 -------------------------------------------------------'------------------ 2,500.00 /,-.n6# Vendor Name RamitU Payee Bunk ChecK# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 5501 R&D BUSINESS INTERIORS No 142077 02/03/04 1,496.37 oimt General Description ^7678 DESK SET/FILE CABINET PO4 Stat Cwntre t# Iovoice4 lma 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11087 C 2353 12y16/03 1,00.37 1,�96.37 @' Distribution Gross Amount Description 100-7�-5228 1.496.37 i EA DESK SET AND FILE CABINET P0 Liquidation Amount 180'71'5220 1,677.88 �P»d# Vendor Name Remit# Payee 754 SAN WRIEL VALLEY NEWSPAPER GROUP �im# General Description �67V PUBLICATION AD# 65673 54341 A/C% 11-960401 Pot S{at Comtpacf4 Invoices Ime Df 6»noa Amount 10581 0 165673 Ui/07/0� 169.65 54341 Ui/07/04 227.07 6L Distribution 6»o55 Amount Description 100-45'5240 169.65 165673 100-45-32Q 227.07 5Q41 P0 Liquidation Amount 10045-52�0 396.72 .S.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 BankCheck# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 12078 02/03/04 396.72 Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 169.65 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) tyof8aldainPark Feb 10, 2004 08.30am Pagc 27 /yment History . 8e/k AP Payment Dates 00/001/0800 to 99/99/9999 Check/ACHA's 141984 !o 142128 Payment Type Check _________________________________________________________________________ 'cnd# Vendor Name Rmmit# Payee 8W, Check8 C6k Date Cheek Amount Sep 5 SAN 6AQRlEL VALLEY TR[� AP 142079 02/03/04 354.96 aim# 6cnen } Description PO4 StatContract#lnvoice# }nvc Of Gross Amount DiscounfAst Discount Used Net Amount 87296 01/15/% 187.05 187.05 Q' Distribution 6vma Amount Description 120+43-5240-030 187.05 87296 ujm# General Description W681 ADt 198309 PO4 Stat Contna t# lmmice# {nm 0t Gross Amount [65co n{ Amt Discount Used Net Amount 106670 0 198309 01/09/04 167'91 107.91 6L Distribution Gross Amount Description 100-03-5240 187.91 198309 PO Liquidation Amount 100-03-5M 167.91 ________________________________________________________________________ 'eod# Vendor Name Rrmit# Payee Bank Check0 Chk Date Check Amount Sep 710 SBC/PAClFIC BELL AP 14208O 02/03/04 48'69 aim# GeneralDewviption �@B PHONE SERVICE (DISPATCH) 331 254-5833 464 4 PO# Stat Comtnactl Immbe# lmm 0t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/07/0� 48.69 �8.69 6L Distribution Gross Amvuni Description 100-25-54-30 48.69 DISPATCH LINE ___________________________________________________________________________ 'cnd# Vandop Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7062 SELECT OFFICE SOLUTIONS AP 142081 0/O-3/04 819.80 aim#GenepalDe5cpip6On ;7686 COPIER SERV CONTRACT PO#StafContra:tl Invoice# Inve Dt Gross Amnwit Di5countAmt Discount Used Net Amount S64222 01/05/Ok 819.80 819.80 8L Distribution Gloss Amount 0esc»iption 131-14-5260-060 819.80 COPIER S8RV CONTRACT __________________________________________________________________________ /emdt Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check4 Chk Date Check Amount Sep 779 S0. CALIF. EBl50N #P 142082 0Y03/84 11/822.82 o/wK General 0e5c»iption �7688 ENERGY-PARK BLDGS PO#StatContract#}nvoice# Inve Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 10549 0 0 01/17/04 1i,822.02 11,822X2 GL Distribution Gross Amount Qemcpiption 127-57-5433 11,822.021EA *AtqNN&fY2093QOO4* ENERGY COST FOR PARK BUILDINGS P0 Ljouidafioo Amount . 3.APkcount5 Payable Release 6.1.3N*APR700 By SANDRA A(SANDRA) ty of Baldoin Park Feb 10, 2004 08g30am Page 28 yment History, Bank AP Payment Oates 00100/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #`s 141984 to 142128 Payment Type Cheer 127 -57 -5433 11,822.02 `end# Vendor game Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Bate Check Amount Sep 2773 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY AP 142083 012103/04 191.88 2im# General Description 71'382 ENERGY TEEN CENTER PO# Stmt Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 10963 0 0 01114104 191.88 191.88 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 100 -57- 5433 -211 191.88 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2003/2004* ENERGY COST FOR THE TEEN CENTER PO Liquidation Amount 100 -57 °5433 -211 191.88 lend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep x726 ST. BERNARD SOFTWARE, INC. AP 142084 02/03/04 382,00 al.m# General Description .7687 RENEW SUB MAINT & UPGRADE CONTRACT 01/11/04 - 01/10/05 RENEW OFM SVR SUB MAINT & UPGRADE 01/05/04 - 01/04/05 PO# Stat Contract# Invo =_cE# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11028 C 43286 11/07/03 382.00 M2,00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 131 -13 -5260 233.00 1 EA RENEW OFM ENT SUB MAINTENANCE & UPGRADE CONTRACT (01 /11/D4 - 01/10/05) FOR NETWARE SERVER 131-13-5260 149.00 1 EA RENEW OFM SVR SUB MAINTENANCE & UPGRADE CONTRACT (01/05/04 - 01/04 /05) FOR HT 4,0 SERVER FO Liquidation Amount 131 -13-5260 382.00 `end# Vendor Name 62F 1 I- MOBILE Remit# Payee aim# General Description .1690 CELL PHONE CHARGES 12/10/03- 01/09/04 A /C# 317720273 PO# 5tat Contract# Invoice# 0 GL Distribution 100 --53 -5210 `end# Vendor Name 2585 THE SHREDDERS aim# General Description ,7692 DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION Invc Dt Gross Amount 01/09/04 47.75 Gross Amount Description 47,75 12/10/03 - 01/09/04 Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 142085 012/03/04 47.75 Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 47.75 Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 142086 02/03/04 55.00 PO# Stmt Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 48077 12/31/03 55.00 55,00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 100-29 -5210 55.00 DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION :S.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) Ly of Baldwin Park Feb 10, 2004 08:330am Page 29 iyment Histoxy. Bank AP Payment Dates 00 /00 /0900 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #'s 141984 to 142128 Payment Type Check lf7nd# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 6467 i%fOMON WEST AP 142087 02/03/04 215.74 :aim# general Description :7691 SUBSCRIPTION ACCT# 1000437757 PO# Stat Contract# invoice# 805714501 GL Distribution 100 -24 -5240 lend# Vendor Name 391 VERIZON CALIFORNIA ['aim# General Description i7594 PH SERV 01 1412 1101673907 06 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 0 GL Distribution 7.00 -26 -5430 '.a.im# General Description 17695 DEC PH SER'V BILL VAN CLEAVE PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 0 GL Distribution 131 -14- 5430 -064 Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12/20/03 215.74 215.74 Gross Amount Description 215.74 11121/03 - 12/20/03 Remit# Payee 1 VERIZON CALIFORNIA '.a,im# General Description 7696 MONTHLY SERVICE 01 1412 1160770115 01 Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AF 142088 02/03/04 5,791.75 Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount used Net Amount 12/28/03 76.32 76.32 Gross Amount Description 7632 SRV 338-5795 Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 01/01/04 115.54 115.54 Gross Amount Description 115.54 DEC PH SERV -VAN CLEAVE PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt dross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 11046 0 0 01./07104 105.39 105.39 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 100 -25 -5439 105.39 1 EA *ANNUAL- FY2003/04* MONTHLY PHONE CHARGES FOR ACCOUNT 01- 1412 - 1160770115 -01 PO Liquidation Amount 109 -25 -5430 105.39 '.aim# General Description i7r597 SERV -TEEN CENTER (DEC) 01 1412 1204246498 04 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Ot Grass Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/01/% 552.91 552.91 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 131 -14- 5430 -064 552.91960-7171 '; -ilm# General Description ij'698 SRV FT -1 LI1E (DEC) 01 1412 1184822352 05 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 01/04/04 204.84 204.89 ;,r3P Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR7013 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) of Baldnin Park Feb 10, 2004 08;30am Page 30 ent 4i5tor,y, Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99 /9999 ;HecR /ACH #`s 141984 to 142128 Payment Type Check GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 1 1 -1.. -543 -064 2�1% 89 1814694 aim# General Description 7599 PHONE SERV-DEC 01 1412 1101348366 06 PO4 Slat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount discount Amt Discount Used Nei Amount 0 12/28/03 4,542.58 4,542.58 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 131 -14 °5430064 4,542.58 197 -9989 aIMg General Description ,77100 PAY PH -TEEN CENTER 01. 1412 1295247526 06 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# O GL Distribution 131 -14- 5430_064 aim# General Description 7701 PAY PH -DEC 01 1412 1299247520 08 PO# Slat Contract# Invoice# 0 GL Distribution 131-14 - 5430-04 Invc Eft Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12/10/03 93.10 93,10 Gross Amount Description 93.10 472 -0034 Invc Dt Gross Amount miscount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 12/25/03 101.02 101.02 Gro85 Amount Description 101.02 4801349 `end# Vendor Name Remit# Payee 3197 VERIZOH FIRELESS MESSAGING SRV airy# General Description �7703 PAGERS - C.E.O. LB- 606475 PO# Slat Contract# Invoice# 10372 0 L8606475EA GL Di5fribu'tion 100 -02 -5210 PO Liquidation 100 -02 -521.0 'rind# Vendor Fume 3767 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS aim# General Description 102 MISC SOPPLIES Hank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 142090* 02/03/04 35.19 Invc Dt Cross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 01/15/04 35.14 35.19 Gross Amount Description 35.14 1 EA 11-ANNUAL- FY2003/2004* PAGER ER'VICE FOR DAYLE KELLER & KARA BOUTON Amount .5.19 Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount `.Sep AP 142091 02 /03/04 912.16 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Piet Amount 945982 01/06/04 777.45 777.45 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 131 -13- 5724 777.45 SUPPLIES aim# General Description '7704 MISC SUPPLIES PL# Slat Contract# Invoice# F.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 NI- APR700 Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Ami Discount Used Net Amount By SANDRA A (SANDRA) !tyof Baldwin Papk Feb 10`2004 08:30am Page 31 ,ymentHistory, Bank AP Payment Dates 0000/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check/A0#'s 11984 to 142128 Payment Type Check 951951 01/07/04 134.71 134.71 6L Distribution Gross Amount Dez�crbutimn '1J1-14--5230-0d3 134,71 SUPPLIES __________________________________________________________________________ �od# Vendor Name Remif# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep �27 WESTERN CITY MAGAZINE AP 142092 02/03/04 190.50 .aim# General Description �7705 JOB AD-H0USlN6 PROGRAM C008D}NAJ%0R 12/31/03 PO4 Stat Contruct# lnvoice4 /mvc 0t Gpwss Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 38663 12/31/03 190.50 190,50 6L Distribution Gross Asmunt Description 100-15-5239 190.50 AD-HS6 PR6 COORD 12/31/0 _______________________________________________________________________ (�,.nJk Vendor, Name Remit# Payee Bank Cheok# Chk Date Oeck Amount Sep 108 CITY OF B.P. PAYROLL AP 142093 02/04/04 298.863.88 oim# General Description i7742 PAYROLL DEPOSIT PP#3 P/E: 01/31/04 (BI-WKLY, COUNCIL & SEMI-MO) P0# Stat Contpact# lnvvicct Iomc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount O 02/04/04 298v063.88 298.063.88 6L 0i5tnibution £puxa Amount 0eoriutivn 100-00-101O 3,606.81 P9#03 P/E: 01/31/04 100-00-10i0 5,266.84 PP#83 P/E� 01/31/04 100-00-1018 289'1900 PP483 P/E; 81/31/O� -----------------------------------------'---------'--------------------- iend# Vendor Nome Remit# Payee Bunk Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 1660 ANY HAR6lN AP 1Q095* 02/85/04 8.75 oim# General Description J711 DEC 8lDESAHRG SUBSIDY R4 Stat Contrac{# %nvvlce4 lnvc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 021%10� 8.75 0.O0 8'75 @L Distribution Gross Amount Description 109-+5-5335 8.75 DEC RI0ESHARE ______________________________ ---------- ____________________________________ 'end# Vendor, Name Ramit# Payee Bank Chedkt Chk Date Check Amount Sep ,604 AM �ALES A9 14�U90 O2/U5/O4 '17.62 7.�2 � uim# General Description 77111 DEC RIDBPAR[PRG SUBSIDY R4 Stat Cont»a t# Immice# lmc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used O 82/04/0� 17.62 8.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Deocniptivn 109-�5-5335 17.62 DEC Rl0BHARE SUBSIDY Net Amount 17.62 �.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 M*APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) iy of Baldwin Paris Feb 10, 2004 08.30am Page 32 ryment History. Bunk AP Payment Dates 011/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACHV5 141984 fo 142128 Payment Type Check Vefld# vendoll. Name �t mi t# Aavea. 3238 ANTHONY VAZQUEZ laim# Generai Description 57712 DECEMBER RIDESHARE PROGRAM SUBSIDY PO4 Stat Contract# Invoice# 0 6L Distribution 109 45 -5335 Bark Check# rhs,. Date Cheek Am u.n.t Sep. AP 142097 02/05/04 20.00 Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 02/04/04 20.00 0.00 20.00 Giooss Amount Description 20.00 DEC RIDESHARE Vend& Vendor game Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 906 ARJAN IDNANI AP 142098 02/135/04 10.00 laim# General Description 17713 DECEMBER RIDESHARE PROGRAM SUBSIDY PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 02/04/04 10100 0.00 10.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 109 -45 -5335 10.00 DEC RIDESHARE Mend# Vendoz fume Remit# Payee 998 ART CASTELLANO laim# General Description 57714 DECEMBER RIDESHARE PR06RAM SUBSIDY PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 0 GL Distribution 10945 -5335 'Vend# Vendor game 1,417 DAVID VILLELA laim# General Description 5-7715 NOV /DEC RIDESHARE SUBSIDY PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 0 6L Distribution 1.04 45 -5335 ----------------------- Vend# Vendor name 4991 ELIZABETH FLORES !aim# General Descr =iption 57716 DECEMBER RIDESHARE SUBSIDY Bank Check# Cf* Date Check Amount Sep AP 142094 Cr2/05/04 20.00 Invc Dt Grass Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 02/04/04 20.00 0.00 20.00 Gross Amount Description 10.00 DEC RIDESHARE PRG Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 142100 02/05/04 35.00 Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 01/04/04• 35.00 0.00 35.00 Gross Amount Description 35.00 DEC RIDESHARE Remit# Payee Bank Check'# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 104.01 02/05/04 15.00 P0# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used 0 02/04/04 15.00 0.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 104 -45 -5335 15.00 DEC RIDESHARE CS,AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N*APR700 Net Amount 15.00 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) i:y of Baldwin Pars; Feb 10, 2004 08:30am Page 34 �ym.ent History, Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #`s 141484 to 142:128 Payment Type Check i --nd# Vendor Hama. 879 ELLEN PARKS a:im# General Description 17717 DECEMBER RIDESHARE SUBSIDY PC# Stat Contract# Invoice# 0 GL Distribution 139 -45 -5335 rend# Vendor Name 1,725 GAMY C SPRY .aim# General Description i'7718 DECEMBER RIDESHARE SUBSIDY PO# Stat Contractli Invoice# U GL Distribution 109 45 -5335 Remit# Payee. Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 142102 02/05/04 18,75 Invc lit Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 02/04/04 18.75 0.00 18.75 Gross Amount Description 18.75 DEC RIDESHARE Remit# payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 142103 02105/04 21.25 Invc Dt Grass Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 02/04/04 21.25 0.00 21.25 Gross Amount Description 21.25 DEC RIDESHARE send# Vendor Name Remit# Payee 6650 GEORGE NELSON ai.tr,# General Description iE7'19 DECEMBER RIDESHARE SUBSIDY PO# Stat ;."on-tract# Invoice# 0 GL Distribution 109 -45 -5335 i end# Vendor flame 1486 GUADALUPE VILLELA aim# General Description ` ',''120 NOV /DEC RIDESHARE PROGRAM Pty# Stat Contract# Invoice# 0 Gi Distribution 109 -4. 5-5335 (f ?nd# Vendor Name 939 HENNIE APODACA Bank Check# C`hk Date Check Amount Sep AP 1421114 02/05/04 31.25 Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 02/04/04 31.25 0.00 31.25 Gross Amount Description 31.25 DEC RIDESHARE Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 142105 02/05/04 33.75 Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 02/04/04 33.75 0100 33.75 Gross Amount Description 33.75 NOWDEC RIDESHARE Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 142106 02/05/04 62,62 aim# General Description ;7721 DECEMBER RIDESHARE PROGRAM SUBSIDY P01 Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Groas Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 02/04/04 62.62 0.00 62.62 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 109 -45 -5335 62.62 DEC RIDESHARE ,-..AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A t`ANDRA) ty of Baldbvin Park Feb 10, 2004 08c30am Rage 36 f'.Ment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00 /00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Checi /ACH #.s :141984 to 142128 Payment Type Chec". -e„d# Vendor Came. Remit# pay-- '_583 JIM HERNANDEZ aim# General Description :7722 DECEMBER RIDESHARE PROGRAM SUBSIDY PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 0 GL Distribution 109 -45 -5335 Bank Lhec.Ea Chk Date Check o AMotfpt Sep. AR 142107 02/055/04 23.75 Invc_ Dt Gross Amount Discount Amf Discount Used Net Amount 02/04/04 23.75 0.00 23.75 Gross Amount Description 23.75 DEC RIDESHARE 'csid# Vendor Dame Remit# Payee 1:100 LINDA GUZMAN aim# General Description :7723 DECEMBER RIDESHARE I'0# Stat Contract# Invoice# 0 GL Distribution 109 -45 -5335 Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 1Q108 02/05/04 18.75 Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 02/04/04 18.75 0.00 18.75 Gross Amount Description 18.75 DEC RIDESHARE PRG !end# Vendor Name Remit# Payee 4923 MARTHA ALVAREZ aim# General Description 1;24 DECEMBER RIDESHARE PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 0 GL Distribution ,09 -45 -5335 Fnd# Vendor Dame 5552 ;MICHELLE CARDONA aim# General Description 7125 DECEMBER RIDESHARE PO4 Stat Contract# Invoice# 0 GL Distribution 109 -45 -5335 'end# Vendor (tame 606 MIKE MADRID Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 142109 62/05/04 21.25 Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 02/04/04 21.25 0.00 21.25 GPO55 Amount Description 21.25 DEC RIDESHARE Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 142110 02/05/04 16.25 Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 02/04/04 16.25 0.00 16.25 Gross Amount Description 16.25 DEC RIDESHARE Remit# Payee Bank Chec4 Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 142111 92/05/04 21.25 aim# General Description ,7726 DECEMBER RIDESHARE PROGRAM SUBSIDY PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount used 0 02/04/04 21.25 0.00 GL Distr=ibution Gross Amount Description 1,09 -45 -5335 21.25 DEC RIDESHARE Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N�APR700 Net Amount 21.25 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) ty of Baldwin Park Feb 10, 2004 08.30am Wage 38 [yment History. Bank AP Payment bates 0100/0000 to 99/9919999 Cher- kIACH #'s 141984 to 142128 Payment Type Check end# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check.# thk Date Check Amount wen. 1314 PATRICIA GUZMAN AP 142112 02/05/04 21.15 a:tm# General Description :7727 DECEMBER RIDESHARE PROGRAM SUBIDY PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 021[14/[14 21.25 0.00 21.25 GL Distribution GPO55 Amount DesCription 109 -45 -5335 21.25 DEC RIDESHARE __--------------------------------------------------------_-__-___...._.._.._.._------------------------------------------------------- `entl# Vendop Name Remit# Payee Bank Cheek# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 727 PETTY CASH AP 242113 02/05/04 779.62 aim# General Description 7737 REPLENISH PETTY CASH PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Inve Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 02/04/04 779.82 0.00 779.82 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 103 -24 -5210 30.00 DAVID REY140S0 100 -29 -5210 3.85 V OLIVAS IFIC -76- 5210 38.34 H HERNANDEZ 100 -24 -5210 15.00 D REYNOSO 100-15 -5210 44.50 M CARDONA 120-47-5210 -031 10.00 G BISHOP 109 -24 -5210 42.67 D REYNOSO 190- 45-5330 10.00 A HARBIN 100 -24 -5210 30.09 R FINDLEY 100 -24 -5210 4536 G KEEF 1001 -24 -5210 26.43 E COLLASO 100 -12 -5330 30.00 3 SANCHEZ 100 -02 -5330 29.00 D KELLER 150 - 10-2151 32.42 L RUBIO 150 - 00-2151 37.78 N MONTENEGRO 100 -53 -5330 40.00 A 1DNAN1 100 - 23-5210 21.63 M DAVIS 100 -24 -5210 10.60 R FINDLEY 100 -24 -5210 39.09 S BLACKBURN 110 -81 -5330 18.98 S CAMP 150 -00 -2176 49.54 1 ALVARE2 1501 -00 -2176 26.57 1 ALVAREZ 100 -53 -5210 45.50 D LOPEZ 100 -76 -5210 50.15 H HERNANDEZ 100 - 27-521.0 37.02 D REYNOSO 100- 12-,5330 22.99 d SANCHEZ S.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) t;• of Baldwin Park Feb 10, 2004 08.30am Wage 39 y,ment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00 /00 /1000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #'s -141984 to 142128 Payment Type Check 'cnd# Vender fume. 5569 RAFAEL PENA aim# General Description X7728 DECEMBER RIDESHARE SUBSIDY POI Stat Contract# Invoice# 0 GL Distribution 1.09--45 -5335 +rind# Vendor, Name 4191 RAMON BURGOS a3.m# General Description �7i29 DECEMBER RIDESHARE SUBSIDY PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 0 GL Distribution 10945 -5335 '-nd# Vendor Dame 5899 RDSA CABALLERO aim# General Description J,730 DECEMBER RIDESHARE PRG PG# Stat Contract# Invoice# 0 GL Distribution I.09- 45-5335 _-- _---- __ -. -_ -_ ---- __-- ---- -_- --- -nd# Vendor Dame '1'724 RUBEN T GARCIA aim# General Description "T131 RIDESHARE PROLRAM SUBSIDY PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 0 Remit# payee Bank Check# Chk Date 'heck. Amount Sep AP 1 ll1 02/05/04 22.50 Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 02 /O4 /O4 22.50 0.00 22.50 Gross Amount Description 22.50 DEC RIDESHARE Remit# Payee Banff Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 14"2115 02/05/04 23.75 Invc Dt Gross Amount discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 02/04/04 23.75 0.010 23.75 Gross Amount Description 23.75 DEC RIDESHARE Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 142116 07/05/04 8.75 Invc Dt G -oss Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 02 1O4/O� 8.75 0,00 8.75 Gross Amount Description 8.75 DEC RIDESHARE PRG Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount 'Sep AP 142117 02/05/04 18.75 Invc Dt Gross Amount Dascouni Amt Miscount Used Net Amount OZ /Olr /114 18.75 0.00 18.75 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 109 -45 -5335 18.75 DEC RIDESHARE -._- -_ ._-----------------------------------------------------.----------------------------------------------------------------------- 'rand# Vendor Dame Remit# Payee Bank Check;# Chk Date Check Amount Sep .587 SHARON RIVERA AP 142118 02/05/04 21.25 ;s::. +.n# General Description 17732 DECEMBER RIDES46RE PROGRAM PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 02 /04 /Oti 21.25 0.ro 21.25 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 109-45 -5335 21.25 DECEMBER RIDESHARE IS-AP Accounts Payable Release 6.13 N *APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) I:y of Baldwin Park Feb 16, 204 08.30am Page 4i iyment History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Check /ACH #`3 141984 to 142128 Payment Type Check rend# Vendor Name 4 283 SHARON THOtt SON .aim# General Deseription 17133 DECEMBER RIDESHARE PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 0 GL Distribution 109 -4.5 -5335 i;:nd# Vendor Name 2463 TIM KINMAN aim# General Description 7;7.134 DECEMBER RIDESHARE SUBSIDY PO# Scat Contract# Invoice# 0 GL Distribution 109 45 -5335 fend# Vendor Name 856 VICKI VALVERDE aim# General Description ?'735 DECEMBER RIDESHARE SUBSIDY PO# Siat Contract# Invoice# 0 GL Distribution 10945 -5335 'end# Vendor Name 2462 100Y S LE11M HARRIS .azm# General Description ;7736 DECEMBER RIDESHARE SUBSIDY PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 0 GL Distribution 109 45 -5335 Remit# Payee Bank {ChecW tCf k Irate Check Amount Sep. AP 142119 02/05/04 47.62 Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 02/04/04 47.62 0.00 47.62 Gross Amount Description 47.62 DEC SUBSIDY Remit# Payee Bank Check# Cl :k Date Check Amount Sep AP 142120 02/05/04 21.25 Invc Di Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 02/04/04 21.25 0.00 21.25 Bross Amount Description 210 DEC RIDESHARE Remit# Payee Funk Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 142121 02/05/04 -17.50 Invc, Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 02/04/04 17.50 0.00 17.50 Gross Amount Description 17.50 DECEMBER RIDESHARE Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 1.42122 02/05/04 15.00 Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 02/04/04 15.00 0.00 15.00 Gross Amount Des cription 15.00 DEC RIDESHARE lend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 6330 CELIA FLETES AP 142124* 02/05/04 178.00 .aim# General Description °r "739 PER DIEM- PARENTS ANONYMOUS CONFERENCE 02/07/04 - 02/10/04 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 02/05/04 178.00 0100 178 AO GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 100-74-53W 178.00 PER DIEM 2/7 -10/04 .,,AP' Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N'APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA3 of Baldwin Park Feb 10, 200+ 08:30am Page 43 ?.,faent History. Bank AP Payment Dates 00/00/0000 to 99/99/9999 Che6/ACHCs 141984 to 142128 Payment lype Check --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- �cnd# Vendor, Name Remi t# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep !x252 HELEN H HERNANDEZ AP 142125 02/05/04 300.00 aim# General Description i7'174C SUPPLIES-TEEN CENTER CALENTINE'S DAY DANCE PO4 Stat Contract# Invoice# 0 GL Distr ibution 100 -76-5210 fcnd# Vendor, Name 4009 OLD WORLD FESTIVAL HALL aim# General Description 17741 SENIOR CITZ TRIP 02/26/04 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 6L Distribution 150-00-2169 Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 02105104 300.00 0.00 300.00 Gross Amount Description 300.00 SUPPLIES-VALENTINES DANCE Remit# Payee Invc Dt Gross Amount 02/05/04 625,00 Gross Amount Description 625.00 SR TRIP 02/26/04 end# Vendor Name Remit# Payee 186 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EMPLOYMENT DEV alf0 General Description �7'138 ST TAX DEPOSIT PP#03 P/E: 01/31/04 (BI-WKLY, COUNCIL & SEMI-MO) Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 142126 02/05/04 625,00 Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0.00 625.00 Bak, Checkt Chk Date Check Amount Sep AP 1+2127 02/05/04 14,478-02 PO# Stat Contpactt Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 02/05/04 -14,478.02 0.00 14,478.02 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 100-00-2221 8.63 PPI03 1/31/94 BIWKLY COUNCIL/SEMI• Ki 100-00-2221 28.61 PK03 1/31/04 BIWKLY COUNCIL/SEMI-00 0-00-222'1 14,40.78 PP#03 1/31/04 BIWKLY COUNCIL/SEMI-MO ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- !end# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 195 P.E.R.S. ATTN: HEALTH BENEFITS AP 142128 02/05/04 131,986,91 a:Lm# General Description X7743 FEBRUARY PREMIUM PP#01-04' PO# Siat Contract# Invoice# H2004-020595000 GL Distribution 100-00-22N 100-00-230/t 100-00-2211 100-81-5140 Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used 02/05/04 131,886.91 Gross Amount Description 713.90 FEB PP#01-02 117,437.46 FEB PPIOI-02 13,131.84 FEB PPt0I-02 603.71 FEB ?REM PP401-02 Net Amount 131,886.91 By -SANDRA A (SANDRA) ;' :.,.AP Accounts Payable Release 6,13 N*APR700 ty of BaldNin Far =k Feb 10, 2004 08:30am Page 44 ;y�jent History, Base AP Payment Dares 00 /00/0000 to 99/99/4999 Check /ACHC -5 141984 to 142:128 Payment Type Check: Ei€i c „hacks: Blank. pages purposely omitted: Non— issused "'VOID” checks: ieck Count 133 3e ��k Total 577,319.42 3,26,33,35,37,40,42 141984 — 141987 i Liquidation Total 42,724.05 141992 iciwp Withholding Total 0.00 142937 — 142039 142041 =id by ACH: 142089 ;H Count 0 142094 :H Total 0.00 142123 Liquidation Total 0,00 :c up Withholding Total 0.00 ;ial Payments: iyfnent Count 133 iyment Total 577,3i9.42 i Liquidation Total 92,724.05 E - -kup Withholding Total 0.00 Id Checks: ,eck Count 0 ieck Total 0.00 i Liquidation Total 0.00 ckup Withholding Total 0100 °'.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.3 N#APR700 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) CITY OF BALDWIN PARK TREASURER'S REPORT January 2004 ESTIMATED INVESTMENT INTERESTPURCHASE MATURITY PAR CURRENT (PREMIUM)/ BOOK MARKET DESCRIPTION RATE DATE DATE VALUE PRINCIPAL DISCOUNT VALUE VALUE Certificate of Deposit 2.28 07/11/03 06/29/2004 500,000.00 500,000.00 0.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 Ahern Assessment District 8.50 03102/89 09/02/08 52,433.22 10,222.56 10,222.56 10,222.56 Improvement Bond 171,140.97 Total Cash $ 1,635,927.99 Total Cash and Investments $ 17 565.480.14 Schedule of Cash and Investments includes all financial assets as included in the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. There were no investment transactions made for the month of January, except for deposits/withdrawals made with the Local Agency State of California Local for other investments approximate cost. The weighted average maturity of the investment portfolio is 1.541 % months. Agency Investment Fund City 1.52 Varies Varies 6,289,861.23 6,289,861.23 - 6,289,861.23 6,289,861.23 Redevelopment Agency 1.52 Varies Varies 7,607,591.11 7,607,591.11 7,607,591.11 7,607,591.11 Housing Authority 1.52 Varies Varies 1,364,968.22 1,364,968.22 1,364,968.22 1,364,968,22 Fiscal Agent Mutual Funds Varies Varies Varies 656,909.03 656,909.03 - 656,909.03 656,909.03 $ 15,971,762.81 6 15,929,552.15 6 0.00 $ 15,929,552.15 Total Investments 15,929,552.15 Cash City General Checking 996,106.35 City Miscellaneous Cash 107,732.89 Redevelopment Agency 35,895.48 Housing Authority 325,052.30 Financing Authority 171,140.97 Total Cash $ 1,635,927.99 Total Cash and Investments $ 17 565.480.14 Schedule of Cash and Investments includes all financial assets as included in the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. There were no investment transactions made for the month of January, except for deposits/withdrawals made with the Local Agency Investment Fund. Market value for the Federal National Mortgage Association was obtained from Sanwa Bank. Market values for other investments approximate cost. The weighted average maturity of the investment portfolio is 1.541 % months. In compliance with the California Government Code Section 53646 et seq., I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the City's expenditure requirements for the next six months that all investment are in compliance to the City's Statement of Investment Policy. Prepared by: Reviewed by: Herlhie E. Apodaca Jose Sanc e Accounting Supervisor Finance Director FEB 1 8 2004 IT CITY OF BALDWIN PARK STAFF REPORT R4 1 CONSENT CALENDAR BALDWIN P,, - R - x TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Dayle Keller, Chief Executive Officer DATE: February 18, 2004 SUBJECT: Proposed Recognitions by the Mayor and City Council for the period February 19, 2004 to March 3, 2004 PURPOSE The purpose of this report is to seek approval of the City Council of requests for plaques, proclamations and certificates; and to recap approved emergency requests. REQUESTS /RECAP As of February 18, 2004, the following requests have been received for the period from February 19, 2004 to March 3, 2004. Re aestecl By List of Honorees Timel©ate /Place of Presentation Date Needed No Requests _ The following emergency requests for plaques and certificates were approved by the Chief Executive Officer and have been ordered and/or prepared: Reoested By List of Honorees Time/Da telPIace of Presentation Date Needed Manny Carrillo Retirees: Friday, January 30, 1129104 Renee Kirkman, Police 2004,9:00 a.m. Dept. and Emily Beltran, Recreation & Community Services _ Mayor Lozano Phil Angelides, California Monday, February 9, 2!9104 State Treasurer 2004, 12:00 noon Mayor Lozano Congressman David Dreier Radisson Hotel Wednesday, February 2118104 18, 2004, 1230 14104 Corak Street, Baldwin Park RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the preparation and presentation of the above certificates. Prepared By: Sharon Thompson, Executive Secretary to CEO CITY COUNCIL MOIL11-BTAMUMA L 1 -E RE: APPROVAL OF PROPOSED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT - DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT �nilw t Tuesday, February 17, 2004 UNDER SEPARATE , I cl 401�� 'Op Vi l jl CITY OF BALDWIN PARK BALDWIN PIA•R,K TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members, FROM: Manuel Carrillo, Jr., Director of Recreation and Community Services DATE: February 18, 2004 SUBJECT: Approval of Facility Use Agreement — Bassett Little League PURPOSE This report requests City Council approval of a facility use agreement with Bassett Little League for the use of Syhre Park. BACKGROUNDIDISCUSSION The City of Baldwin Park owns the property identified as Syhre Park. The property is located on Vineland Avenue south of Walnut Creek Flood Channel along the border of the unincorporated area of the County of Los Angeles (Bassett). The property was donated to the City to be utilized as a youth baseball field on April 2, 1973. Due to the location of the park and the boundaries established for little league, the league primarily serves residents of the Bassett community. Bassett Little League utilizes the field on an annual facility use agreement, since 1973. Council previously approved the annual facility use agreement at their February 6, 2002 City Council Meeting. Pursuant to the agreement, staff administratively implemented a one (1) year extension of the facility use agreement for the 2003 Little League season. The City of Baldwin Park and Bassett Little League have entered into a facility use agreement in respect to the following: The public interest will be served by allowing Bassett Little League to use the City owned property identified as Syhre Park for little league activities, including the operation of the snack bar. 2. Bassett Little League shall provide and keep in effect a liability insurance policy naming the City as co- insured in the amount of 1,000,000 and by a company approved by the Director of Recreation and Community Services. 3, Bassett Little League shall provide, operate and maintain, at its sole expense, all equipment, supplies and materials for the operation of a Little League facility. League officials shall provide an annual up to date inventory of all equipment to the Director of Recreation and Community Services. Page Two February 18, 2004 Bassett Little League Facility Use Agreement 4. The term of this agreement shall be for a period of one (1) year, with a one (1) year extension. Either party may, with or without cause, terminate this contract upon giving a thirty (30) days written notice. 5. The Baldwin Park Pony Baseball Organization will annually utilize the baseball diamond during the Bassett Little League off - season, which is approximately mid July through late January. Also any other Baldwin Park Baseball Organization approved by the Director of Recreation of Community Services will be eligible to utilize the baseball diamond. The Department will continue to offer seasonal programs. 6. Bassett Little League will reimburse the City for the actual cost of lighting the Park (baseball field lights), as determined by bills to the City by Southern California Edison. This action is consistent with the other four baseball organizations in the City. FISCAL IMPACT No fiscal impact, other than routine maintenance regularly performed at other City facilities. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached Facility Use Agreement with Bassett Little League and authorize the Mayor to execute the necessary documents. Attachment: Facility Use Agreement AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 18 day of February, 2004, by and between the CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, a municipal corporation (hereinafter "CITY "), and BASSETT LITTLE LEAGUE (hereinafter "LEAGUE). WITNESSETH The parties hereto do agree as follows (1) RECITALS: This Agreement is made and entered into with respect to the following facts: (a) That the public interest, convenience and necessity require that CITY obtain a suitable organization and concessionaire for the purpose of operating a little league program, and the food and refreshment facility at the City -owned property known as Shyre Park (hereinafter "Park "); and (b) That LEAGUE desires to enter into this Agreement enabling LEAGUE to provide a little league program and concession services hereinafter referred to by this Agreement; and (c) That LEAGUE is qualified to conduct little league programs and act as concessionaire. (2) NATURE OF ACTIVITY AND CONCESSION: CITY does hereby grant to LEAGUE, and LEAGUE does hereby accept, the exclusive right, privilege and duty to operate a little league program and conduct a concession for the sale of food and refreshments at the Park, at a location to be approved by Director of Recreation and Community Services. The operation of the concession stand shall be limited to servicing LEAGUE activities, except as provided at Section 13, below. For the purpose of this Agreement, the term "food and refreshments" shall mean and include soft drinks, candy, ice cream, prepared sandwiches, coffee and other miscellaneous items customarily available from operation of the type herein established. LEAGUE is specifically precluded from the dispensing or serving of any food or materials in glass containers to patrons. LEAGUE shall maintain the area around the concession facility in a clean condition at all times. (3) TERM: The term of this Agreement shall be for a period of one (1) year, commencing February 1, 2004, unless sooner terminated as provided herein. Either party hereto, may, with or without cause, upon the giving of thirty (30) days written notice to the other, terminate this Agreement. CITY, not later than ninety (90) days prior to the expiration of said one (1) year period shad, at its sole discretion, have the right to extend this Agreement for an additinnal period of one (1) year Upon the same terms and conditions as set forth herein. (4) RENTAL: For and in consideration of the grant of this concession license and use of the Park, LEAGUE does hereby agree to provide building and field. maintenance and utility service on the Park, at a level determined by the members of the Department of Recreation and Community Services, as designated by the Director. Maintenance services shall include all labor, materials, equipment and utility costs for the duration of this Agreement. City shall provide lighting of the Park. LEAGUE shall pay City for the actual cost of lighting the Park, as determined by bills to the City by Southern California Edison. LEAGUE shall pay City as follows: March 2004 $245.00 April, 2004 $427.00 May, 2004 $451.00 June, 2004 $507.00 July, 2004 $521.00 TOTAL $2,151.00 Payment shall be made to the Department of Recreation and Community Services no later than the tenth (10th) day of each month, commencing March 10, 2004. Should any payment be delinquent, the City shall not be obligated to continue to provide such lighting to the Park. No later than September 1, 2004, City shall provide a written accounting to LEAGUE of the actual amount paid by City to Southern California Edison for providing lighting to the Park. If the actual amount charged City is less than $2,151.00, City shall refund the difference at the time it provides LEAGUE with the accounting. if the actual amount charged City by Southern California Edison exceeds $2,151.00, LEAGUE shall pay the difference to City within ten (10) days following receipt of such accounting. Failure of LEAGUE to pay City the amount as specified herein shall be a material breach of this Agreement. (5) FACILITIES & SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY CITY: CITY shall provide a facility (hereinafter referred to as "playing field and concession area ") in substantially the condition as it presently exists for the operation of said activities. The Director of Recreation and Community Services may, upon direction of City Council, cause, at CITY's expense, the playing field and concession area to be relocated at such other location on Shyre Park as may be required in the public interest. (6) LIABILITY: LEAGUE agrees to hold CITY, and its officers, agents and employees, free and harmless from any and all loss, claim, demand or judgment for injury to persons or property caused by LEAGUE's negligent or willful act or omission to act, arising out of its use and occupancy of the concession area_, its operations hereunder; and. its use. of Shyre Park for LEAGUE activities. LEAGUE shall promptly give notice to CITY of any claim or suit instituted or filed against it for any alleged act involving liability of either LEAGUE or CITY, arising out of operation under this Agreement. In order to assure compliance with the foregoing provisions, LEAGUE shall meet all of the insurance requirements as set forth herein. (7) INSURANCE: LEAGUE shall, during the term of this Agreement, provide and keep in effect, naming the CITY as coinsured, liability insurance in amounts and companies as approved by the Director of Recreation and Community Service. Each of the policies of insurance shall bear an endorsement providing for a thirty (30) day notice of cancellation to be given to the Director of Recreation and Community Services, prior to the effective date of such cancellation. Contemporaneously with the execution of this Agreement, LEAGUE shall file an endorsement of insurance with the CITY, reflecting the existence of the above described insurance policies. The Director of Recreation and Community Services, at his or her discretion, should LEAGUE fail to maintain, during each day of the term hereof, the policies of insurance required hereunder, may: (a) terminate this Agreement and remove all property of LEAGUE from the concession area, and store the same at LEAGUE's expense; or (b) obtain, at LEAGUE's expense, the required insurance coverage. (8)' SIGNS AND ADVERTISEMENTS: No signs or advertising matter of any kind shall be displayed unless and until approved in writing by the Director of Recreation and Community Services. (9) FIXTURES AND EQUIPMENT: LEAGUE shall provide, install and maintain at its sole expense all necessary equipment for the operation of the concession. Any and all such furniture, trade fixtures and appliances shall be approved by the Director of Recreation and Community Services before installation, and shall remain the property of said LEAGUE, and may be removed by LEAGUE at the termination of this Agreement, provided that, if such removal occasions any damage to the premises, the cost of repair shall be borne by LEAGUE. (10) MAINTENANCE: LEAGUE shall be solely responsible for the cost of maintenance of equipment provided by them and all equipment listed on Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Exhibit "A" shall be an inventory list of assets. Any substantial change in equipment shall require prior approval of CITY. (11) CONTROL AND REPAIR OF PREMISES: Not withstanding section 4 herein, CITY shall have full and absolute control of the buildings and all appurtenances thereto during the term of this Agreement and shall have the right to make changes and alterations therein in the surrounding grounds as may be determined by said CITY. (12) FOOD AND BEVERAGE PRODUCTS: All food, drinks, beverages, confectioneries, refreshments, etc., sold or kept for sale by LEAGUE shall be of the highest quality. The prices to be charged therefore shall be uniform at all times and seasons, and shall be equal to prices charged in similar establishments in the neighborhood. No imitation, adulterated, mis- branded or impure articles shall be sold or kept for sale by LEAGUE, and all merchandise kept on hand by said LEAGUE shall be stored and handled with due regard for public health and sanitation. CITY shall have the right to order the improvement of the quality of any merchandise to adequately serve the public. (13) DAYS AND HOURS OF OPERATION: LEAGUE shall keep the concession open in accordance with the following schedule: (a) During all organized programs under jurisdiction of the LEAGUE, scheduled by LEAGUE. (b) For special activities approved by the CITY. The Director of Recreation and Community Services shall have the sole discretion to modify the above schedule of operations upon the request and showing of good cause by LEAGUE. (14) LEAGUE shall at all times conduct its business in a professional and orderly manner. (15) LAWS AND ORDINANCES: LEAGUE shall conduct its business in accordance with all the laws, ordinances, rules and regulations applicable to such business as set forth by the CITY, County, State and Federal Government, including, but not limited to, the Baldwin Park Municipal Code, as the same now exists, or as the same may be in the future. (16) PERMITS AND LICENSES: LEAGUE shall be required to obtain any and all permits or licenses that may be required by law in connection with the operation of the concession. property jinnn such termination, and shall execute and deliver to CITY a good and sufficient document of relinquishment, if and when requested. (24) WAIVER OF CLAIMS: LEAGUE hereby expressly waives any and all claims for compensation for any and all loss or damage sustained by reason of any defect, deficiency or impairment of the water system, drainage or heating systems, gas mains, electrical apparatus or wires furnished for the premises covered by this Agreement which may occur from time to time from any cause or for any loss resulting from water, tornado, civil commotion or riot; and LEAGUE hereby expressly releases and discharges said CITY from any and all demands, claims, actions and causes of action from any of the aforesaid causes. (25) SUCCESSORS: This Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of any successor of CITY and any successor or assignee of LEAGUE, provided that the same is first approved by CITY. (26) NOTICES: All notices required to be given under the terms of this Agreement shall be given by United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: CITY: (a) Director of Recreation and Community Services City of Baldwin Park 14403 East Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, CA 91706 LEAGUE: (b) Angel Guzman, President Bassett Little League 1120 North Vineland Bassett, CA 91746 (27) TIME: Time is of the essence on this Agreement. IN WITNESSETH WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed on the day, month and year first above written. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK Manuel Lozano, Mayor A Angel Guzman, Presii ent Bassett Little League City Attorney City Clerk Alf A... BALDWI N P, A, K, K CITY OF BALDWIN PARK STAFF RLE060 "' To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Mark P. Kling, Chief of Police OPI- Date: February 18, 2004 ITEM NQ. Subject: Request to Appropriate Grant Funds for the Purpose of Establishing Police Communications Interoperability. Purpose The purpose of this report is to request Council approval to appropriate money granted by the Office of Homeland Security to upgrade the police department's radio system. Background /Discussion One of the issues coming to light since the terrorist attack on September 11, 2001 is the amount of interagency cooperation that is required to manage a major terrorist event. The speedy coordination of police agencies is paramount if law enforcement is going to have any advantage over a mobile and dangerous terrorist, or group of terrorists. For many years, police departments have communicated autonomously, on radio frequencies separate from those of surrounding, even contiguous, agencies. Communicating with neighboring agencies during an emergency situation often required the different agencies' dispatchers to relay to each other, by telephone, the transmissions of the officers in the field. These dispatchers then needed to relay that information to their respective field officers. This kind of third party relay often resulted in garbled and inaccurate information, as well as a delay of precious seconds that could very well adversely affect the outcome of an emergency event. The Baldwin Park Police Department has applied for, and has received, a grant award of $18,174.00 for the upgrade of the police communications facility, and the mobile radios in the police units, in order to be capable of direct radio communication with our neighboring agencies (a condition called interoperability). While designed to make near - instantaneous and accurate communication among agencies possible during terrorist incidents, this capability can also be used on a daily basis if needed, during emergencies of a purely domestic nature. The grant requires that the City expend the funds prior to applying for reimbursement. Therefore, the police department is requesting that the City Council appropriate interoperabiiity $18,174.00 from the grants fund into the police department communications cost center 28. Once the alppropf CUMJn is cvri r1icte, the poliic co department will p0 o..,eed with enL YYINY NVl/4!\+�i VY ILiE purchasing the radio interoperability equipment, then request reimbursement from the Federal government. The process of receiving the reimbursement should be between 45 to 90 days. Fiscal Impact There is no impact to the General Fund, The Grant will be recorded as estimated grant revenues in the Grants Fund, account number 139.00.4422 in the amount of $18,174.00 and appropriated to the Police Department's budget, Communications cost center account number 139.28.5745, in the amount of $18,174.00. Once the equipment has been purchased, the police department will submit the required documents to the Federal Government and reimbursed in the amount of $18,174.00. Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Authorize the police department staff to proceed with purchasing the required radio interoperability equipment. 2. Authorize the Finance Director to make a budget amendment in the amount of $18,174.00 to the Grants Fund, appropriate the funds to police cost center 139.28.5745. 3. Authorize the Police Chief to complete any required documents for processing the purchase of equipment and for acquiring the full reimbursement of grant funds. interoperability BALDWIN l' A , R K CITY OF BALDWIN PARK TO: Mayor and City Council IV FROM: Kara Bouton, Assistant to the CEO DATE: February 18, 2004 ITEM NO. j- 11' STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Mid -Year Status Update of Chamber of Commerce Contract PURPOSE: The purpose of this report is to provide the City Council with a status update of the Chamber of Commerce's activities as regards their agreement with the City. BACKGROUND In 1998, the City of Baldwin Park discontinued annual funding to the Chamber of Commerce but has since contracted with the Chamber to provide services on a project - by- project basis. In FY 01, the City allocated funds to the Chamber to produce a business directory. In FY 02 funds were allocated to the Chamber to compensate them for the services they provide as an information Center for the City. For FY 2003, the City Council approved a comprehensive proposal from the Chamber of Commerce that provided for the completion of numerous projects as well as the information center services. The total funds allocated to the Chamber last fiscal year were $100,050. These funds provided for Business Promotion, Assistance and Retention; Community and Cultural Promotion; and Economic Development programs. Some of the most visible projects completed with that contract include: 1 "Shop Baldwin Park" program, 2. Restaurant Guide, 3. Business /Business Person of the Year luncheon 4. Business Expo 5. Monthly Green Team meetings The Chamber has carried over $7,000 from this agreement to complete the City Map, a compact disc listing all Baldwin Park businesses to be made available to interested parties, and Business Start -Up and Relocation kits as well as a Residential Relocation kits. These projects are all expected to be completed by the end of May. DISCUSSION: SERVICE CONTRACT In April, 2003, the Chamber of Commerce re- submitted their proposal funded in FY 2003 for consideration for funding in FY 2004. This proposal did not include the provision of information service center services or the provision of the Green Team, which is a City /Chamber team that visits various businesses in Baldwin Park to determine their needs. Based on staff's work with the Chamber during the previous contract period and the success of various proposed programs, staff worked with the Chamber to establish the scope of work included here as Attachment A. The City Council approved an agreement for the provision of these services in an amount not to exceed $80,000 on September 17, 2003. The projects included in the proposal are being completed on a timely basis and a status of the projects is included as Attachment B. BALDWIN PARK NOW The City also contracts with the Chamber of Commerce for the publication of the Baldwin Park NOW. This agreement is renewed annually and has been in place for the past thirteen years. The City's monthly costs for the publication and mailing of the NOW are $2,454 for an annual cost of $29,448. Based on information from the Chamber, the City's contribution is approximately 42% of the total annual cost for the publication of the NOW. The City Council has also requested a copy of the Chamber's annual budget. This will be provided to the City Council prior to the February 18th meeting under separate cover, FISCAL IMPACT This City's total commitment to the Chamber of Commerce this fiscal year is $109,444. This amount has been approved in the FY 2003 -04 budget with $80,000 charged to AB 1693 (Business Improvement Fees) funds. The NOW contract costs of $29,448 are charged to the General Fund. RECOMMENDATION. It is recommended that the City Council receive and file this report. ATTACHMENT "A„ Baldwin Park Clamber of Commerce FY 03 -04 Proposal for Services 1) BUSINESS PROMOTION, ASSISTANCE AND RETENTION $50,500 a) Business Training & Assistance $25,000 i) Educational Seminars (at least 3) ii) Green Team — Meetings with at -risk businesses to provide assistance iii) Business Outreach through Ambassador visits to non - member businesses, Newsletters to all businesses iv) Networking Groups, Group Mixers v) Legislative Advocacy for Businesses vi) Business advertising and marketing through the NOW vii) Membership Development and Retention through increased communications with members (i.e. Quick News, Chamber listserv) viii)Liaison between City and Businesses for such things as Small Business Loans, permits, licenses ix) Business information center, issuance of certificates of origin x) Website maintenance with links to businesses /information needed by businesses. A) New Business Orientation /Business Start -up assistance b) Shop Baldwin Park Campaign $12,500 i) Discount cards ii) Restaurant guide iii) Advertising campaign c) Business /Business Person of the Year $3,000 d) Business Expo & Fiesta $5,000 e) Business Relocation Package $5,000 2) COMMUNITY AND CULTURAL PROMOTION $29,500 a) Community Outreach $15,500 i) Information Center for residents ii) Tours and Welcome Packages for visitors iii) Partners in Education Program iv) Candidate Voter's Forum v) Residential Relocation Package vi) Joint Programs with the City vii) Groundbreakings /Ribbon Cuttings vii i)Participation in community programs b) Community Recognition Programs i) Citizen of the Year ii) Young Citizen of the Year c) Mayor's State of the City ATTACHMENT "A" $7',000 Total $80,000 v CP O 0 U v a� c� A� L7 U 4� d' O N M O N ATTACHMENT "B" a; o U d�° v) 0 Q 75 Q 01) � ci C Ln V) M U Q ll Q Q UO CD b; O � C cn Q tb cd un © N y v O c�G c� Z� G> v s un pJ O D U 5c p D "d ? Ar N _ C cl�3 ,.0 � uo 75 0 0 n Z in, a l� N On © bj�� o L6 1+2 W O W H nn = W r-+ N m d v A 0 i °•+ � � q� U U �+..t U ■ i i �� I j CC$ 1 UO cr In cn rn V cri U O by m ° © zi N CID Td w a� 3_ con Q co °' °' ' C& t CA ca U, con b .0 rS ., U cn a� 3 C-0 a� , U �s C cn 3 � � tn uo C m + =s` CIO C4 x o DO a ;.=• �--, v p ,-, � � cwt v � cC o � 7Z� It CIO o a on C4 to a a 71 u o ° i N Cif O o r� © CA CCt O un cr fu h 'J ✓ _ tlo NO © LW a C 1 w • G p W • ✓C N GIB U W W Crl if) AU m .. �... �. Z3 i. Cam. Z3 d A E � o 0 cq N ' �.,on a�U cd 7� o q5 H are "a H R H � U sl i V1 U tD U o U 4- o 17. x ar o 40 o tb U 1 ma BALDWIN P , A � R � K TO: [4- 010yi l CITY OF BALDW,7N PARK MEMORANDUM Honorable Mayor and Council Members Kara Bouton, Assistant to the CEO DATE: February 18, 2004 SUBJECT: Additional Information for February 18, 2004 Agenda Item No. 1 -H — Mid -Year Status Update of Chamber of Commerce Contract Attached for your information is the Budget Summary for the Chamber of Commerce's Proposed FY 2003 -04 Budget. C: Dayle Keller, Chief Executive Officer Stephanie Scher, City Attorney Baldwin Park Chamber of Commerce 2003 -2004 Budget 2003-2004 Budget Revenues Advertising 25000 City Project 73670 Event 10760 Grants 14000 investment 3000 Membership 15000 Miscellaneous 6700 Mixers 1900 NOW 56150 Other Publications 9000 Rental 1700 Sponsorship 11900 Total Revenues 228780 General & Administrative Expenses Banking Expenses 50 Donations 100 Hues &Subscriptions 100 Educational & Training 50 Employee Relations 100 Insurance 1200 Interest 2100 Internet Services 800 Maintenance 2800 Miscellaneous 500 Office Equipment 2500 Office Supplies 2900 Property Taxes 1900 Postage, Mailing 1000 Salaries, Taxes, Benefits 81900 income Taxes 2500 Telephone 4300 Utilities 3200 Allocated G &A Cost -58427 Total Gen. & Adm. Expenses 49573 Events, Projects & Publication Cost Donation 2000 Events Cost 37225 L &P 1900 Miscellaneous 5000 Printing 5500 NOW 66000 Allocated G &A Cost 58427 'total Events, Projects & Publication Cost 176052 Net Operating Income / (Deficit) 3155 FEB 1 8 2004 CITY OF BALDWIN PARK PUBLIC 1 11 STAFF REPORT BALDWIN P , A • R , K TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Melecio Picazo, Interim Director of Community Developme DATE: February 18, 2004 SUBJECT: A request for approval of an Amendment to the General Plan (AGP -106) and a Zone Change (Z -539)— Location: 3224 -3356 Baldwin Park Blvd. and 13712 -13716 Foster Ave.; Applicant: City of Baldwin Park. PURPOSE This report requests City Council consideration of a request for approval of an amendment to the City's General Plan Land Use Element, to redesignate the subject properties from Single - Family Residential to Residential Garden and a zone change from R -1, Single - Family Residential to RG, Residential Garden, pursuant to Section 153.631 of the City's Municipal Code. CEQAINOTICING A Notice of Public Hearing was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune, and mailed to all property owners within a 300 -foot radius of the subject properties on February 5, 2004. The Planning Division has completed an environmental analysis, and has determined that the project will not have a significant impact upon the environment and pursuant to that information; a Draft Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact has been prepared pending approval by the City Council. Planning Commission Meeting At the January 28, 2004 Planning Commission Meeting, the Commission recommended that the City Council adopt the Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact and approve an amendment to the City's General Plan Land Use Element, to redesignate the subject property from Single- Family Residential to Residential Garden and a zone change from R -1, Single- Family Residential to RG, Residential Garden. BACKGROUND The subject property's General Plan Land Use designation is Single - Family and is consistently zoned R -1, Single - Family Residential. The subject properties are located at 3224 thru 3356 inclusive on the south side of Baldwin Park Boulevard and 13712 AGP -106 & Z -539 February 18, 2004 }Paae 2 of 3 thru 13716 inclusive on the west side of Foster Avenue shown as Parcels 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 on page 4 of Map Book 8555 of the Los Angeles County Assessor's Records and Parcels 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, 26, 29, 30, 31, 32 on page 3 of Map Book 8555 of the Los Angeles County Assessor's Records. The adjacent zoning and land uses are listed in the following table. Table 1 Adiacent Zoning & Land Use A, scent Piro e . I P Zvn�n 9 Property lse li tacsto North R -1 Single-Family Residences South C -2 Commercial /Retail East R -1 Single-Family.. Residences West Baldwin Park B1vd.IRG Multi-Family Residences DISCUSSION GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT /ZONE CHANGE The requested General Plan Amendment and Zone Change are a result of a recommendation made by the Planning Commission at their December 10, 2003 meeting, recommending that the City Council consider rezoning a block of parcels along the east side of Baldwin Park Blvd. just north of Francisquito Ave. and south of Foster Ave (Reference Exhibit "B" map) In order to address the request of the Planning Commission and to provide zoning consistency with another similar request within the block of parcels, staff has concurrently processed this city - initiated request with the other similar application. This overall zone change will be beneficial to the City in that it will provide additional moderate density housing stock, take advantage of the underutilized deep lots and potentially eliminate blight in the area with high quality multi- family moderate density developments. In addition, the close proximity to public transportation and being within walking distance to commercial retail centers, make this zone change request beneficial to the City. The Land Use Element of the City's General Plan sets goals and policies to address the relationship between development and land use activity and to provide integration between existing community qualities and the vision for the future. Maintaining a balanced mix and distribution of land uses provides opportunities for housing developments at a range of densities and housing types that accommodate the varied interests and needs of present and future residents. Another supportive aspect of the rezoning is that the block of parcels directly across the street, there already exists a land use designation of RG, Residential Garden. This existing multi - family zoning, together with the newly designated multi - family zoning will create compatibility and complement existing developed densities. AG€' -106 & Z -539 February 18, 2004 rave 3 of 3 RECOMMENDATION Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council: 1. Adopt the Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact; and 2. Introduce on first reading Ordinance 1227, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ADOPTING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT, TO REDESIGNATE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO RESIDENTIAL GARDEN AND A ZONE CHANGE FROM R- 1, SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL GARDEN TO RG, RESIDENTIAL GARDEN (APPLICANT: CITY OF BALDWIN PARK; CASE NO.: AGP -106 AND Z -539). ATTACHMENTS: #1 - Exhibit "A" - Existing Zoning and Land Use Designations #2 - Exhibit "B" - Proposed Zoning and Land Use Designation #3 - Environmental Data — Draft Negative Declaration and Initial Study #4 - Ordinance 1227 ATTACHMENT "1" Exhibit "A" — Existing Zoning and Land Use Designations 0 S 13557 13654 339 3351 . 3432 \ �Xzz 331 3314 .Exhibit "A" Existing Zoning and Land Use Designation N CASE NO.: AGP -106 AND Z -5 3 9 ADDRESS: 3224 -3356 Baldwin Park Blvd. and 13712 -13716 Foster Ave. DATE: February 18, 2004 Not to ATTACHMENT "2 "" Exhibit "i3 " - Proposed Zoning and Land Use Designation Exhibit "B" Proposed Zoning and Land Use Designation CASE No.: AGP -106 AND Z -539 N ADDRESS: 3224 -3356 Baldwin Park Blvd. and 13712 -13716 Foster Ave. DATE: February 18, 2004 Not to Scale ATTACHMENT "31' Environmental Data Draft Negative Declaration and Initial Study INITIAL STUDY, ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION 1. Project Title: 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: 4. Project Location: 5. Assessor's Parcel Number: 6. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: 7. General Plan Designation: Zone Change from R -1, Single - Family Residential to RG, Garden Multi - Family Residential and an amendment to the City's General Plan Land Use Element to redesignate the subject properties from Single - Family Residential to Garden Multi - Family Residential. City of Baldwin Park 14403 E. Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, CA 91706 Salvador Lopez Jr., Assistant Planner (626) 813 -5261 The subject properties are located at 3224 thru 3356 inclusive on the south side of Baldwin Park Boulevard and 13712 thru 13716 inclusive on the west side of Foster Avenue Parcels 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 on page 4 of Map Book 8555 of the Los Angeles County Assessor's Records and Parcels 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, 26, 29, 30, 31, 32 on page 3 of Map Book 8555 of the Los Angeles County Assessor's Records. City of Baldwin Park 14403 E. Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, CA 91706 Single - Family Residential 8. Zoning: R -1 (current) x '9 9. Surrounding Land Uses Incorporated in 1956, the City of Baldwin Park is located and Settings: approximately 17 miles east of downtown Los Angeles. The intersection of. the 1 -10 (San Bernardino) and 1 -605 (San Gabriel River) freeways lies near the southwest corner of this 6.8 sguare mile City. Although Baldwin Park is predominantly a. residential bedroom community, recent efforts have placed a greater emphasis on promoting commercial and industrial land uses. However, the City is near "build- out", focusing efforts on the Redevelopment of land, especially within close proximity to the freeway. According to the 2000 Census, Baldwin Park has approximately 75,900 persons. This is more than double the population in 1960. Baldwin Park is predominantly a Hispanic working class community, although between the 1990 and 2000 Census has experienced a recent increase in its Asian population. Furthermore, the City has a considerably larger than average household size than the County average, suggesting increased pressure on the City's housing stock and the provision of services. The subject property (currently zoned C -1, Neighborhood Commercial) is located on the west side of Pacific Ave. Surrounding land uses are developed with a mixture of single - family residential units, multi.- family residential units, medical offices, church and neighborhood based retail uses. 10. Description of Project: Introduction, Purpose and Need for the Project: Recently, the Planning Division has received a request from the Planning Commission to consider changing the zoning on a block of parcels along the eastside of Baldwin Park Blvd. just north of Francisquito Ave. As a result, Planning Staff has initiated the process with an application for a zone change from R -1, Single- Family Residential to RG, Residential Garden. This zone change request will also require an approval of an amendment to the City's General Plan Land Use Element to redesignate the subject properties from Single- Family Residential to Garden Multi - Family Residential. Project Characteristics: A request for approval of a zone change from R -1, Single - Family Residential to RG, Residential Garden and an amendment to the City's General Plan Land Use Element to redesignate the subject property from R -1, Single - Family Residential to Garden Multi - Family Residential, pursuant to Section 153.631 of the City's Municipal Code. 11. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement) No additional public approvals beyond Planning Commission and City Council will be required for this project. 12. References The following are also referenced where appropriate in the Environmental Checklist Form: a. General Plan b. Municipal Code C. Zoning Code d. Emergency Operations Coordinator e. Geological Map — Liquefaction Zones EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers, except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project - specific factor as well as general standards (e.g.,' the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project - specific screening analysis.) 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including offsite as well as onsite, cumulative as well as project - level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. �3 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross - referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiring, program EIR, or other GEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. C) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures, which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site - specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: Explanation of Checklist Judgements: I(a). No Impact. The zone change will not have an adverse affect on a scenic vista or result in the obstruction of any scenic views. I(b). No Impact. The zone change will not result in the damage or destruction of scenic resources or historical buildings. I(c). No Impact. This project will not substantially degrade the existing visual character and quality of the City of Baldwin Park. Through the Design Review process, any new multi- family residential development will be designed so as to ensure no aesthetic offensive site; building or mechanical equipment will be open to public view. I(d). No Impact. This project will not create any new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the residential zones. Less Than Less TK66 ....... .. .. .......... . Potentially Significant Potentially Significant Less Than Significant I AESTHETICS Significant with Significant No Impact Impact Impact Mitigation Impact In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are Incur oration Would the project: ❑ ❑ ❑ . a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not iimited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an within a state scenic highway? ❑ ❑ El c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or farmland. Would the project. of the site and its surroundings? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare ❑ which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the 1:1 prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring area? Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- Explanation of Checklist Judgements: I(a). No Impact. The zone change will not have an adverse affect on a scenic vista or result in the obstruction of any scenic views. I(b). No Impact. The zone change will not result in the damage or destruction of scenic resources or historical buildings. I(c). No Impact. This project will not substantially degrade the existing visual character and quality of the City of Baldwin Park. Through the Design Review process, any new multi- family residential development will be designed so as to ensure no aesthetic offensive site; building or mechanical equipment will be open to public view. I(d). No Impact. This project will not create any new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the residential zones. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: jl(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not convert any type of farmland to a non - agricultural use. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than II AGRICULTURE RESOURCES Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact incorporation In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project. a) Convert Prime Farmland, unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps ❑ 1:1 prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? ❑ ❑ ❑ C) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non -a ricuiturai use? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: jl(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not convert any type of farmland to a non - agricultural use. II(b). No Impact. The proposed project will not conflict with the existing garden multi- family residential zoning designation, agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract. II(c). No impact. The project will not result in the conversion of farmland to non - agricultural uses. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: II[(a). No Impact. The proposed project does not conflict with any applicable air quality plan. The City of Baldwin Park is located within the South Coast Air Basin, which is a non - attainment area for selective pollutants. Air pollution is a regional problem. Pollution levels in Baldwin Park are a result of not only local emissions, but also of those throughout the region. lll(b). No Impact. The project will not result in a cumulative net increase of pollutants for which the region is in non - attainment. III(c). Tress Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the region is in non - attainment. The Southern California Association of Governments and the South Coast Air Quality Management District have adopted a South Coast Air Quality Management Plan (SCAQMP). The proposed project is consistent with that plan and will not have a significant impact upon air quality. However, there will be temporary increases in air pollutant emissions during the construction phase of any new development. Construction dust and air pollution will be reduced with the following procedures. Procedures to reduce air pollution include the following: 1) That the applicant adheres to the SCAQMD Rule 403 insuring the clears up construction related dirt on approach routes to the site. 2) The watering techniques shall be employed to partially mitigate the impact of construction generated dust particles. 3) Maintenance and servicing of construction equipment to minimize exhaust emissions. 4) Halting of construction activities during Stage 1 and Stage 2 smog alerts. lll(d). No Impact. The proposed project will not expose any nearby sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Potentially Less Than Less Than ([I AIR QUALITY Significant Significant With Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact p Incur oration .Im act p Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relief upon to make the following determinations. Would the Project.' ❑ a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? — ■ b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air El 1:1 ® ❑ quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? El 1:1 1:1 ■ e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: II[(a). No Impact. The proposed project does not conflict with any applicable air quality plan. The City of Baldwin Park is located within the South Coast Air Basin, which is a non - attainment area for selective pollutants. Air pollution is a regional problem. Pollution levels in Baldwin Park are a result of not only local emissions, but also of those throughout the region. lll(b). No Impact. The project will not result in a cumulative net increase of pollutants for which the region is in non - attainment. III(c). Tress Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the region is in non - attainment. The Southern California Association of Governments and the South Coast Air Quality Management District have adopted a South Coast Air Quality Management Plan (SCAQMP). The proposed project is consistent with that plan and will not have a significant impact upon air quality. However, there will be temporary increases in air pollutant emissions during the construction phase of any new development. Construction dust and air pollution will be reduced with the following procedures. Procedures to reduce air pollution include the following: 1) That the applicant adheres to the SCAQMD Rule 403 insuring the clears up construction related dirt on approach routes to the site. 2) The watering techniques shall be employed to partially mitigate the impact of construction generated dust particles. 3) Maintenance and servicing of construction equipment to minimize exhaust emissions. 4) Halting of construction activities during Stage 1 and Stage 2 smog alerts. lll(d). No Impact. The proposed project will not expose any nearby sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. ~$ i III(e), No Impact. The proposed project will not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: IV(a). No Impact. The project will not have any effect on any species identified by the California Department of Fish and Game or the US Fish and Wildlife Service. IV(b), No Impact. The project will not have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in any local or regional plans, policies regulations or by the California Department of Fish and game or by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. IV(c). No Impact. The project will not have a substantial effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. There are no federally protected wetlands within the City of Baldwin Park. IV(d). No Impact. The project will not interfere with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites as the City of Baldwin Park is within an urbanized area and not within five (5) miles of a wildlife corridor. W(e). No Impact. The proposed project does not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, as the City of Baldwin Park does not have any ordinances protecting trees, wildlife, etc... IV(f). No Impact. The project proposal will not conflict with any provisions of an adopted habitat conservation plan, natural community conservation plan or any local, regional or state habitat conservation plan, as the City's General plan does not indicate any of the referenced plans which could be affected by the project proposal. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than IV BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive or special status species in local or ❑ ❑ regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in focal or El El 11 regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act El El . (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, El etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with ❑ El established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nurse sites ❑ ❑ El e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, ❑ El 11 N or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation Ian? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: IV(a). No Impact. The project will not have any effect on any species identified by the California Department of Fish and Game or the US Fish and Wildlife Service. IV(b), No Impact. The project will not have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in any local or regional plans, policies regulations or by the California Department of Fish and game or by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. IV(c). No Impact. The project will not have a substantial effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. There are no federally protected wetlands within the City of Baldwin Park. IV(d). No Impact. The project will not interfere with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites as the City of Baldwin Park is within an urbanized area and not within five (5) miles of a wildlife corridor. W(e). No Impact. The proposed project does not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, as the City of Baldwin Park does not have any ordinances protecting trees, wildlife, etc... IV(f). No Impact. The project proposal will not conflict with any provisions of an adopted habitat conservation plan, natural community conservation plan or any local, regional or state habitat conservation plan, as the City's General plan does not indicate any of the referenced plans which could be affected by the project proposal. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: V(a). No Impact. The project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. V(b). No Impact. The project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource. V(c). No Impact. The project will not directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or geological feature. V(d). No Impact. The project is not expected to disturb any human remains. The City of Baldwin Park does not have any cemeteries. Less Than Vl GEOLOGY AND SOILS Potentially Significant 7S�ig Than No Impact V CULTURAL RESOURCES Significant with nific No impact Would the Project: El Impact Mitigation Impact a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ❑ Incor oration ❑ Would the project: ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ® a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a ❑ historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? El 1:1 ❑ ■ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of ❑ an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ C) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geological feature? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ �d)F Disturb any human remains, including those interred ❑ outside of formai cemeteries? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 -1 -8 of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risk to life or property? ® Explanation of Checklist Judgements: V(a). No Impact. The project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. V(b). No Impact. The project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource. V(c). No Impact. The project will not directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or geological feature. V(d). No Impact. The project is not expected to disturb any human remains. The City of Baldwin Park does not have any cemeteries. Less Than Vl GEOLOGY AND SOILS Potentially Significant Impact Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact Incor oration Would the Project: El ❑ ❑ a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ❑ ❑ ❑ ii) strong seismic ground shaking? ❑ ❑ ❑ iii) Seismic - related ground failure, including liquefaction? ® ❑ ❑ iv) Landslides? ® ® ❑ ❑ b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on or offsite landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? ® ❑ ❑ d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 -1 -8 of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risk to life or property? ® a ❑ ❑ L) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: Vi (a). No Impact. The proposed project will not expose people or structures to potentaa substantial adverse effects involving the rupture of a known earthquake fault. According to the City's General plan, there are no active faults within the City of Baldwin Park, therefore no Alquist- Priolo Special Study Zones are within the City. Although there are no active faults within the City of Baldwin Park, there are several major faults surrounding the City, which have the potential for causing major damage; however, the occurrence of direct ground rupture is not likely according to the City's General Plan. Potential for this type of activity is similar throughout Southern California and no unique or unusual risk is posed by the proposed project. According to the Seismic Hazard Zones Map dated 3199 from the State Department of Geology and Mines, the project area is not within a liquefaction zone. Vl(b), No Impact. The City is located in a relatively flat urbanized area with a very low potential for wind and water erosion of soils. VI(c). No Impact. The City is not located on a geological unit or soil that is unstable and could result in landslide, spreading liquefaction or collapse according to the Seismic Hazards Zone Map dated March 25, 1999 from the State geologists Office. VI(d), No Impact. The City and the project area are located on a very low to low expansive soil as defined in Table 18 -1 -B of the UBC (1997). Therefore the project will not create any risk to life or property. Vl(e). No Impact. The proposed project's location does have sewers available for the disposal of wastewater. Furthermore, the soils at the proposed location can adequately support the use of the sewers. Less Than VII HAZARDS AND Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact HAZARDOUSMATERIALS Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: ❑ ❑ ❑ a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident ❑ i"( El ® . conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? C) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code El Section 65952.5 and, as a result, would it create a si nificant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a pubic airport or public use airport, would the project ❑ ❑ El result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the proje2t area? E] El N f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or ® working in the eroject area? ❑ El g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildiand fires, including where wWdlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: IMEWi VII(a). No Impact. The project will not create a significant hazard to the public through the routine transport use or disposal of hazardous materials. It is not anticipated that there will be any hazardous materials associated with the proposed project. VII(b). No Impact. There will be no significant hazard to the public or the environment regarding the upset or release of hazardous materials into the environment. VII(c). No Impact. The project will not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous material, substances or waste within one - quarter of an existing school. VII(d). No Impact. The proposed project is not located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous materials sites. VII(e). No Impact. The project is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public airport, and therefore would not create a hazard to people residing or working in the area. Vll(f). No Impact. Since the project is not within the vicinity of a private airstrip, the project would not create a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area. Vll(g). No Impact. According to the City's Emergency Operations Coordinator, the project proposal will not impair implementation or physically interfere with the City's adopted emergency plan or emergency evacuation plan. Vll(h). No Impact. The project proposal is within a highly urbanized area and will therefor not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildiand fires. Less Than VII[ HYDROLOGY AND WATER Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact QUALITY Impact Mitigation Impact incorporation Would the project. ❑ ❑ El a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of El El El M pre - existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? C) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in ❑ El M substantial erosion or siltation on or offsite? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount ❑ of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on or offsite? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacfty of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. .. ... ... ...... ..... ... _. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: VIII(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements, as the new dwelling unit will generate minimal amounts of solid waste typical for this particular residential use. VIII(b). No Impact. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies or interfere with groundwater recharge. VI11(c). No Impact. The proposed project will not substantially alter the course of an adjacent stream or river, which would result in erosion, or siltation of the site as there is no stream or river running through the City, which the exception of the channelized San Gabriel River. VIII(d). No Impact. The proposed project will not substantially alter the drainage patterns of the City and will not alter the course of a stream or river, as there are no streams or rivers in the City with the exception of the channelized San Gabriel River. VI11(e). No Impact. The proposed project will not create or contribute run -off, which would exceed the capacity of the existing storm drain system. Nor will the proposed project provide any polluted run -off. VIII(f). No Impact. The project will not degrade the existing water quality because of the limited amount of impervious surfaces associated with the project. VIII(g). No Impact. The project proposal will not place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area. Furthermore, the City is not within a Flood Zone. Federal Emergency Management Association (FEMA) has the City of Baldwin Park classified as Zone C---- 060100. VIII(h), No Impact. The proposal is not within a 100 -year flood hazard area. FEMA has classified the City of Baldwin Park as Zone C- 060100. VIII(i). No Impact. The project proposal will not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss involving flooding as a direct result of the failure of a levee or dam. Although the Santa Fe dam is located directly adjacent to the City across Arrow Highway, large -scale flooding as a result of failure of this particular dam is negligible due to the design of the dam in that water is present in the dam only a few months of the year_ VIII(j). No Impact. Since Baldwin Park is an inland City, it could not experience a tsunami and the few bodies of water in Baldwin Park are small enough that they would not be able to produce a seiche large enough to cause any damage. Furthermore, Baldwin Park is an urbanized City with no hillsides to speak of and therefore, damage caused by mudflow would be negligible. Less Than VIII HYDROLOGY AND WATER Potentially significant Less Than Significant . ]Kith Significant No impact QUALITY Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation ME ❑ ❑ ❑ h) " Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? ❑ El El j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: VIII(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements, as the new dwelling unit will generate minimal amounts of solid waste typical for this particular residential use. VIII(b). No Impact. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies or interfere with groundwater recharge. VI11(c). No Impact. The proposed project will not substantially alter the course of an adjacent stream or river, which would result in erosion, or siltation of the site as there is no stream or river running through the City, which the exception of the channelized San Gabriel River. VIII(d). No Impact. The proposed project will not substantially alter the drainage patterns of the City and will not alter the course of a stream or river, as there are no streams or rivers in the City with the exception of the channelized San Gabriel River. VI11(e). No Impact. The proposed project will not create or contribute run -off, which would exceed the capacity of the existing storm drain system. Nor will the proposed project provide any polluted run -off. VIII(f). No Impact. The project will not degrade the existing water quality because of the limited amount of impervious surfaces associated with the project. VIII(g). No Impact. The project proposal will not place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area. Furthermore, the City is not within a Flood Zone. Federal Emergency Management Association (FEMA) has the City of Baldwin Park classified as Zone C---- 060100. VIII(h), No Impact. The proposal is not within a 100 -year flood hazard area. FEMA has classified the City of Baldwin Park as Zone C- 060100. VIII(i). No Impact. The project proposal will not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss involving flooding as a direct result of the failure of a levee or dam. Although the Santa Fe dam is located directly adjacent to the City across Arrow Highway, large -scale flooding as a result of failure of this particular dam is negligible due to the design of the dam in that water is present in the dam only a few months of the year_ VIII(j). No Impact. Since Baldwin Park is an inland City, it could not experience a tsunami and the few bodies of water in Baldwin Park are small enough that they would not be able to produce a seiche large enough to cause any damage. Furthermore, Baldwin Park is an urbanized City with no hillsides to speak of and therefore, damage caused by mudflow would be negligible. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: IX(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Zone Change and General Plan Amendment will not physically divide an established community but will increase the allowable density previously allowed in the single - family residential zone. The maximum permitted density for the current single - family zoning is 0 to 8.7 du /ac. The maximum permitted density for the newly created residential garden zoning will be 8.8 to 12 du /ac. This increase in moderate density will allow for the construction of new attached or detached housing units provided that the development meets all standards and criteria set forth in the City's Zoning Code and Design Guidelines. Once the zoning on the said parcels is changed, pursuant to this approval, the lots will share a common rear lot line with an R -1 zoned lot. In order to lessen the effects of multi- family developments, the City's Zoning Code requires, as part of the development standards, a rear yard depth of not less than twenty (20) feet. IX(b). No Impact. The proposed zone change will require an amendment to the City's General Plan to redesignate the subject properties from Single- Family Residential to Garden Multi- family Residential. Therefore, once the amendment is approved, the project will not be in conflict with any land use plan, policy or regulation of an agency that has jurisdiction over the project. IX(c). No Impact. Currently the City has no habitat conservation plans or natural community conservation plans which would possible be affected by the proposed project. Less Than Less Than Potentially Significant Potentially Significant Less Than Significant IX LAND USE. AND PLANNING Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Would the project: ❑ Incorporation ❑ Would the project: ❑ ❑ El ❑ a) Physically divide an established community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or Ian, specific plan, or other land use plan? regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, El El El ■ iocaf coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? 11 El 11 . c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: IX(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Zone Change and General Plan Amendment will not physically divide an established community but will increase the allowable density previously allowed in the single - family residential zone. The maximum permitted density for the current single - family zoning is 0 to 8.7 du /ac. The maximum permitted density for the newly created residential garden zoning will be 8.8 to 12 du /ac. This increase in moderate density will allow for the construction of new attached or detached housing units provided that the development meets all standards and criteria set forth in the City's Zoning Code and Design Guidelines. Once the zoning on the said parcels is changed, pursuant to this approval, the lots will share a common rear lot line with an R -1 zoned lot. In order to lessen the effects of multi- family developments, the City's Zoning Code requires, as part of the development standards, a rear yard depth of not less than twenty (20) feet. IX(b). No Impact. The proposed zone change will require an amendment to the City's General Plan to redesignate the subject properties from Single- Family Residential to Garden Multi- family Residential. Therefore, once the amendment is approved, the project will not be in conflict with any land use plan, policy or regulation of an agency that has jurisdiction over the project. IX(c). No Impact. Currently the City has no habitat conservation plans or natural community conservation plans which would possible be affected by the proposed project. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: X(a). No Impact. The project will not result in the loss of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region or the residents of the State. There are no known mineral resources located within the City of Baldwin Park according to the City's General Plan. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than X MINERAL RESOURCES Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact incorporation Would the project: ❑ El ❑ a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? El El b) Resuft in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general Ian, specific plan, or other land use plan? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: X(a). No Impact. The project will not result in the loss of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region or the residents of the State. There are no known mineral resources located within the City of Baldwin Park according to the City's General Plan. X(b). No Impact. The project will not result in the loss of a locally important mineral resource recovery site, as the City's General. Plan does not indicate any known mineral resources.. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XI(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not result in the exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the City's General Plan, noise ordinance or applicable standards of other agencies. Noise levels would increase temporarily during the construction of a project. Construction is regulated by the City and is addressed in the Municipal Code to limit overall noise levels to an acceptable range. increased population and development will result in increasing noise from a variety of sources commonly found in an urban environment (human activities, mechanical equipment, automobiles, pets, etc.). This increase is considered to be less than significant. XI(b). No Impact. The project will not result in the exposure of persons to generation of excess ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels. XI(c). No Impact, The project will not result in a substantial permanent increase of ambient noise levels. Xl(d). No Impact. The project will not result in a substantial or periodic increase in ambient noise levels above levels that are existing. XI(e). No Impact. The City of Baldwin Park is not located within an airport land use plan not within two miles of an airport. Therefore, the amendment will not expose people to excessive noise levels. XI(f). No Impact. The City of Baldwin mark is not within the vicinity of a private airstrip. Therefore, the amendment will not expose people to excessive noise levels. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than XI NOISE Significant with Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incor oration Woufd the project result in: F-1 ■ a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? ❑ ❑ C) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? ❑ ❑ ❑ . d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the ro'ect? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project ❑ ❑ expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? ❑ ❑ ❑ f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XI(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not result in the exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the City's General Plan, noise ordinance or applicable standards of other agencies. Noise levels would increase temporarily during the construction of a project. Construction is regulated by the City and is addressed in the Municipal Code to limit overall noise levels to an acceptable range. increased population and development will result in increasing noise from a variety of sources commonly found in an urban environment (human activities, mechanical equipment, automobiles, pets, etc.). This increase is considered to be less than significant. XI(b). No Impact. The project will not result in the exposure of persons to generation of excess ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels. XI(c). No Impact, The project will not result in a substantial permanent increase of ambient noise levels. Xl(d). No Impact. The project will not result in a substantial or periodic increase in ambient noise levels above levels that are existing. XI(e). No Impact. The City of Baldwin Park is not located within an airport land use plan not within two miles of an airport. Therefore, the amendment will not expose people to excessive noise levels. XI(f). No Impact. The City of Baldwin mark is not within the vicinity of a private airstrip. Therefore, the amendment will not expose people to excessive noise levels. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XII(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The provision of future additional multi - family residential units will increase the population of the area, which may result in higher levels of traffic and increased demands on municipal agencies. The increase in population will not create a significant impact. According to the Population and Housing Estimates for Individual Counties from the Department of Finance, a slight increase would be expected to occur with an average of 4.4 persons per dwelling. The potential result of increased manpower and equipment needed to serve citywide demands are evaluated annually. The project is in compliance with the City's General Plan. XII(b). No Impact. The project will not displace substantial numbers of existing housing which will necessitate the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. XII(c). No Impact. The proposed project will not displace substantial number of individuals /families necessitating the construction of replacement housing as any future development will be in compliance with the General Plan and applicable zoning regulations. Less Than Less Than Potentially Significant Potentially Significant Less Than Significant All POPULATION FIND l f' USING Significant With Significant No Impacr Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Would the project: result in substantial adverse physical impacts Incorporation Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and ❑ ❑ governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause ❑ businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable roads or other infrastructure )? ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Usplace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing any of the public services? elsewhere? ❑ ❑ ❑ a) Fire protection? C) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the C) Schools? construction of replacement housing elsewhere? e) Other public facilities? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XII(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The provision of future additional multi - family residential units will increase the population of the area, which may result in higher levels of traffic and increased demands on municipal agencies. The increase in population will not create a significant impact. According to the Population and Housing Estimates for Individual Counties from the Department of Finance, a slight increase would be expected to occur with an average of 4.4 persons per dwelling. The potential result of increased manpower and equipment needed to serve citywide demands are evaluated annually. The project is in compliance with the City's General Plan. XII(b). No Impact. The project will not displace substantial numbers of existing housing which will necessitate the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. XII(c). No Impact. The proposed project will not displace substantial number of individuals /families necessitating the construction of replacement housing as any future development will be in compliance with the General Plan and applicable zoning regulations. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XIII(a). No Impact. The proposed project should not result in the additional need for new or altered fire protection and will not alter acceptable service ratios or response times. Whether or not the project would require additional police service or fire staff depends on the total requirements of the City and County. Currently the City is served by Station 29, which is located at Los Angeles Street and Maine Avenue. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than X1II PUBLIC SERVICES Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ I E a) Fire protection? b) Police protection? C) Schools? d) Panes? e) Other public facilities? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XIII(a). No Impact. The proposed project should not result in the additional need for new or altered fire protection and will not alter acceptable service ratios or response times. Whether or not the project would require additional police service or fire staff depends on the total requirements of the City and County. Currently the City is served by Station 29, which is located at Los Angeles Street and Maine Avenue. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XV(a). No Impact. The proposed zone change and amendment will not result in an estimated increase in traffic. XV(b). No Impact. The project will not exceed a level of service standard established by the County Congestion Management Agency for designated roads or highways. XV(c). No Impact. The proposal will not result in a change or increase in air traffic patterns or levels that result in substantial safety risks. XV(d). No Impact. The proposal will not increase hazards due to a design feature or incompatible uses, as the project does not include new construction of streets. XV(e). No Impact. The project will not result in inadequate emergency access. XV(f). No Impact. The proposed project will not have an impact on existing parking facilities or create a need for new parking. XV(g). No Impact. The proposed project will not conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation. Less Than f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, ❑ ❑ ❑ bicycle racks)? significant with Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XV(a). No Impact. The proposed zone change and amendment will not result in an estimated increase in traffic. XV(b). No Impact. The project will not exceed a level of service standard established by the County Congestion Management Agency for designated roads or highways. XV(c). No Impact. The proposal will not result in a change or increase in air traffic patterns or levels that result in substantial safety risks. XV(d). No Impact. The proposal will not increase hazards due to a design feature or incompatible uses, as the project does not include new construction of streets. XV(e). No Impact. The project will not result in inadequate emergency access. XV(f). No Impact. The proposed project will not have an impact on existing parking facilities or create a need for new parking. XV(g). No Impact. The proposed project will not conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XVI(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. XVI(b). No Impact. The proposed project will not require the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or the expansion of existing facilities. Less Than XVI UTILITIES AND SERVICE Potentially Significant Less Than significant with Significant No Impact SYSTEMS Impact Mitigation Impact Incur oraiion Would the project, ❑ ❑ El a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing i 1 facilities, the construction of which could cause significant LJ environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the ❑ El ■ construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? ❑ ❑ ❑ d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that It has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? ❑ ❑ f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposat needs? F-1 g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to sotid waste? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XVI(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. XVI(b). No Impact. The proposed project will not require the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or the expansion of existing facilities. XVI(c). No Impact. The project site is not within a flood zone area. The increase in impervious surfaces primarily due to the proposed street will marginally increase runoff from the project area. The project will be required to provide satisfactory drainage to available storm drains. XVI(d). No Impact. The project will not affect existing water supplies provided to the City. XVI(e)..No Impact. The proposed project does not involve a project that will result in a determination by the watershed treatment provider that it has adequate capacity to serve a demand. , XVI(f). No Impact. The proposed zone change and amendment will not increase the demand for solid `waste disposal. The City in an effort to reduce the amount of solid waste disposed currently provides recycling containers to residents for the recycling of paper, glass, plastic and aluminum. Waste Management, the City waste hauler utilizes the Puente Hills landfill which has enough permitted capacity to accommodate the proposed project's waste disposal needs. XVI(g). No Impact. The proposed project will comply with all federal, state and local statutes relating to solid waste. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XVII(a). No Impact. The proposed project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of major periods of California history or prehistory. XVII(b). No Impact. The project does not have impacts that are individually limited by cumulatively considerable. A majority of the environmental factors analyzed within this initial study will have an impact by the proposed project. XVII(c). No Impact. The project does not create environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. Less Than XVII MANDATORY FINDINGS OF Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact SIGNIFICANCE impact Mitigation impact Incorporation Does the project: a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or ❑ ❑ ■ animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ( "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a ❑ ❑ project are considerable when viewed fn connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of Probable future projects.) ❑ ❑ ❑ C) hoes the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XVII(a). No Impact. The proposed project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of major periods of California history or prehistory. XVII(b). No Impact. The project does not have impacts that are individually limited by cumulatively considerable. A majority of the environmental factors analyzed within this initial study will have an impact by the proposed project. XVII(c). No Impact. The project does not create environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. ATTACHMENT "4" Ordinance 1227 ORDINANCE NO. 1227 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ADOPTING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT, TO REDESIGNATE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO RESIDENTIAL GARDEN AND A ZONE CHANGE FROM R -1, SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL GARDEN TO RG, RESIDENTIAL GARDEN (APPLICANT: CITY OF BALDWIN PARK; CASE NO.: AGP -106 AND Z- 539). THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby find, determine and declare as follows: a) That the City of Baldwin Park filed an application for an amendment to the City's General Plan Land Use Element and a zone change from R-1, Single - Family Residential RG, Residential Garden for real property located at 3224 thru 3356 inclusive on the south side of Baldwin Park Boulevard and 13712 thru 13716 inclusive on the west side of Foster Avenue shown as Parcels 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 on page 4 of Map Book 8555 of the Los Angeles County Assessor's Records and Parcels 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, 26, 29, 30, 31, 32 on page 3 of Map Book 8555 of the Los Angeles County Assessor's Records, described more particularly in the said application which is on file in the office of the Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City; and b) That pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Planning and Zoning Law (Sections 658000 et seq. of the Government Code of the State of California), studies were commenced for the purposes of amending the Zoning Map of the City of Baldwin Park; and C) That a duly noticed public hearing was held upon said matter by the Planning Commission, and based upon the evidence presented, it was determined that the public necessity, convenience, and general welfare warranted that it recommend approval of the reclassification to RG; and d) That the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said matter and based upon the evidence presented and each member of the Council being familiar with the site, it was determined that the public interest, necessity, convenience and general welfare warrant the approval of the Planning Commission recommendation and approval of an amendment to the General Plan and a change in zone classification, herein described from R -1 to RG. SECTION 2. That notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 153.630 - 153.646 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code, the Zoning Classification of the property be and is hereby reclassified from R -1 to zone RG. Ordinance 1227 SECTION 3. That the City Council at the time of the public hearing on the above matter reviewed and considered the proposed Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact, and comments relating thereto. That the City Council, based on its public review, does hereby approve the proposed Negative Declaration, since there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant impact upon the environment. SECTION 4. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause a copy of the same to be published in a manner prescribed by law, and shall forward a copy of the same to the Secretary of the Planning Commission. The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall file the Notice of Determination and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact. PASSED AND APPROVED ON THE 18th day of February 2004 MANUEL LOZANO, MAYOR ATTEST: KATHLEEN SESSMAN DEPUTY CITY CLERK Ordinance 1227 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES } ss: CITY OF BALDWIN PARK } I, KATHLEEN SESSMAN, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was regularly introduced and placed upon it's first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on February 18, 2004, That there after said Ordinance 1227 was duly approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBER: NOES: COUNCILMEMBER: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBER: KATHLEEN SESSMAN DEPUTY CITY CLERK CITY OF BALDWIN PARK 7.. c. NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING BALDWN PyA. - R - TO: Property Owners within a 300 foot radius. FROM: Baldwin Park City Clerk SUBJECT: Generai Plan Amendment (AGP -106) and Zone Change (Z -539) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT a public hearing to consider the following cases will be held at 7:00 P.M. by the Planning Commission of the City of Baldwin Park in City Council Chambers, 14403 E. Pacific Avenue, on Wednesday, February 18, 2004. All interested parties may appear and be heard at that time. CASE NO: AGP 106 and Z -539 ADDRESS: 3224 -3356 Baldwin Park Boulevard and 13712 -13716 FosterAvenue. The subject properties are located at 3224 thru 3356 inclusive on the south side of Baldwin Park Boulevard and 13712 thru 13716 inclusive on the west side of Foster Avenue shown as Parcels 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 on page 4 of Map Book 8555 of the Los Angeles County Assessor's Records and Parcels 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, 26, 29, 30, 31, 32 on page 3 of Map Book 8555 of the Los Angeles County Assessor's Records. REQUEST: A City initiated request, for amendment to the City's General Plan Land Use Element, to redesignate the subject propertyfrom Single - Family Residential to Residential Garden and a zone change from R- 1, Single - Family Residential to RG, Residential Garden, pursuant to Section 153.631 of the City's Municipal Code. An environmental assessment has been completed for General Plan Amendment (AGP 106) and Zone Change (Z -539). As a result, an initial study has been completed and it has been determined that the case will require a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact pursuanttothe California Environmental QualityAct. The case is available for review during normal business hours. Not to Seale I / _1� f If in the future anyone wishes to challenge a decision of the City Council in the court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described above or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the Public Hearing. If further information is desired on the above case, please contact the Planning Division at (626) 813 -5261 and refer to the case number. If you areaware of someonewhowould be interested in becoming informedofthecontemplated actions, please pass this notice along as a community service. Para inforrnacion en espanol accerca de este caso favor de Ilarnar al (626) s1 5z61. /K: hleen Sessman Deputy City Clerk F l ► 11111 11 � BALDWIN P , A ° R - K CITY OF BALDWIN PARK FEB 1 8 %004 ITPM non � 2 PUBLfG; NEARING STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Melecio Picazo, Interim Director of Community Development DATE: February 18, 2004 SUBJECT: A request for approval of a Zone Change (Z -538), a Development Plan (DR -25) and a Tentative Tract Map (TM- 60796) — Location: 3242 -3250 Baldwin Park Blvd.; Applicant: Alturas Engineering and Associates. The following entitlement requests are contingent upon the City Council approving a separate city - initiated Amendment to the City's General Plan and a Zone Change for the properties surrounding the above - mentioned address. rallaao This report requests City Council consideration of a request for approval of a zone change to allow the planned development overlay on the RG, Residential Garden Zone (provided the city - initiated amendment to the General Plan and zone change is approved), pursuant to Section 153.630 of the City's Zoning Code and a Development Plan to allow the construction of a five (5) unit single- family detached planned development, pursuant to Section 153.271 of the City's Zoning Code. A supplementary request is for approval of a tentative tract map to subdivide one (1) lot into six (6) lots for residential purposes, pursuant to Section 152.07 of the City's Municipal Code. CEQAINOTICING A Notice of Public Hearing was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune, and mailed to all property owners within a 300 -foot radius of the subject properties on February 5, 2004. The Planning Division has completed an environmental analysis, and has determined that the project will not have a significant impact upon the environment and pursuant to that information; a Draft Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact has been prepared pending approval by the City Council. Planning Commission Meeting At the January 28, 2004 Planning Commission Meeting, the Commission recommended that the City Council adopt the Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact and approve a zone change to allow the planned development overlay on the RG, Z -538, DR -25 & TM-60796 February 18, 2004 Paae2of9 Residential Garden Zone (provided the city - initiated amendment to the General Plan and zone change is approved), a development plan to allow the construction of a five (5) unit single - family detached planned development and a tentative tract map to subdivide one (1) lot into six (6) lots for residential purposes. BACKGROUND The subject property's General Plan Land Use designation is Single- Family and is consistently zoned R -1, Single - Family Residential. The property is rectangular in shape and contains approximately 23,602 square feet (.54 acres) of area. The site is essentially flat and is developed with a single- family residence, which will be demolished to accommodate the proposed development. The adjacent zoning and land uses are listed in the following table. Table 1 Adjacent Zoning -& Land Use adjacent Property Zoning V Y A Else L0,00r 0. North R -1 3 Single-Family Residences South R -1 Single-Family Residence East R -1 Single-Family Residence West Baldwin Park Blvd. /RG Multi-Family Residences DISCUSSION The City - initiated General Plan Amendment and Zone Change (AGP -106 & Z -539) are prerequisites to the preparation of the subject property for the proposed construction of a five (5) unit single - family detached planned development. The current R -1 zoning of the property does allow for residential developments but does not allow for the proposed density of the project, without changing the zoning and the maximum allowable density. When the applicant first approached Planning Division Staff with their proposal, staff informed the applicant that the underlying zone would not accommodate the density of the proposal and would not be compatible with its surrounding single- family residential zoning and that an amendment to the General Plan Land Use Element and Zone Change would be required, should they wish to continue with the proposal. Originally, the applicant submitted the amendment to the General Plan and zone change request along with the aforementioned entitlements of this report. Once the Planning Commission recommended approval for the city - initiated request, the applicant's similar request became null and void. Therefore, the approval of this application is contingent upon the approval of the city - initiated request to amend the General Plan and zone change. Should the City Council approve the city - initiated request and this request, the proposed development will be able to meet the development standards required of the newly changed zoning. Z -538, DR -25 & TM -60796 February 18, 2004 Paae 3 of 9 ZONE CHANGE — Planned Development Overlay Should the Zone Change be approved, an additional zone change is being requested to add the Planned Development (PD) overlay on the RG, Residential Garden Zone. The PD overlay allows for flexible development standards to encourage and achieve innovative developments exhibiting a superior architecture and site design quality. Planned Development projects have been proven in the past to be successful because they provide quality housing with a sense of community, which is compatible with, and enhances the surrounding neighborhood. Any Planned Development contains a provision that requires approval of a Development Plan before building permits can be issued. Where such a Plan has been so approved, the development standards of the underlying zone shall be excluded and superseded by the conditions and standards of the Development Plan. DEVELOPMENT PLAN The applicant is proposing to construct a five (5) unit single- family detached housing development. According to the plans submitted to the Planning Division, three of the five single- family homes will have access from a private driveway entering from Baldwin Park Boulevard east of the property. This particular design will orientate two of the homes toward the street, thus, creating a residential presence. Each residential unit will have their own enclosed private open space, ranging from 1,085 square feet to 3,072 square feet, which will be accessible from within the homes. Additional features include: colored stamped concrete within the driveway area and decorative slump stone block walls. According to the floor plans and elevations, all residential units will be two -story with floor areas ranging from 2,303 square feet to 2,410 square feet and consist of four (4) bedrooms and a two -car garage. Six (6) additional guest parking spaces will be provided within the common driveway area without compromising the overall integrity of the project. The table below provides detailed information on individual lot areas, unit floor areas and private open space areas: Lot/Unit Lot Size Floor Area Private Open Space 1 3,176 sq.ft. 2,303 sq.ft. 1090 sq.ft. 2 3,530 sq.ft. 2,303 sq.ft. 1490 sgJL 3 2,921 sq.ft. 2,303 sq.ft. 1085 sq.ft. 4 2,921 sq.ft. 2,303 sq.ft. 1260 sq.ft. 5 4,347 sq.ft. 2,410 sq.ft. 3072 sq.ft. 6 6,707 sq.ft. Common Area *Includes the private driveway, guest parking spaces and other landscaped areas. Z -538, DR -25 & TM -60796 February 18, 2004 Page 4 of 9 - Building Height and Architectural Design The applicant has proposed to employ different designs and materials that will provide variety and aesthetic interest throughout the project. The exterior elevations of the proposed homes will have a mixture of stucco finished elevations with stucco pop -outs at base of multi -paned windows and with decorative slate veneers all having concrete roof tiles. The overall site will be enhanced by the use of a variety of plantings and the provision of a number of trees throughout the site. Each of the proposed units has been designed to avoid a "monolithic" appearance. The exterior walls and rooflines are staggered along both the vertical and horizontal planes. The roof and wall variations, along with the subtle changes in colors, help to visually reduce the mass and bulk of the buildings. The project will involve the construction of six (6) foot high block walls around the perimeter of each unit to enclose the private open space areas. Any walls that are visible from the public right -of -way will be decorative slump stone block. When designing the project, the applicant opted to provide more than the minimum required private open space areas for each of the dwelling units. The proposed development's layout is unique in that the applicant also proposes larger and wider lots in an effort to provide a more aesthetically superior home design. Larger lots allow for a larger building plan, which de- emphasizes the garage doors and gently improves the aesthetics of the units. This improvement is achieved by allowing the windows and doors to advance and thereby making the homes more inviting as viewed from the street. The inclusion of front porches further improves the appearance of the homes. Staff is of the opinion that this project meets the purpose and intent of the Planned Development Overlay Ordinance and the City's adopted Design Guidelines for Single - Family Detached Planned Residential Developments. Approval of this project will result in the improvement of the overall neighborhood. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP — TM -60796 As a prerequisite for the proposed development, a request for approval of a tentative tract map to subdivide one (1) lot into six (6) lots for residential purposes is required. According to the Tentative Tract Map (TM- 60796), the applicant is proposing to subdivide the lot into six (6) lots (five lots for each of the residential units and one lot for the common driveway, guest parking spaces and common landscaped areas). The applicant will then file a final tract map showing the six (6) subdivided lots for future recordation in accordance with the tract map process. According to the Engineering Division, this type of planned development subdivision is considered to be a condominium subdivision whereby the units are served by a common driveway and each of the property owners having their own lot (building footprint and private rear yards), not having an individual street frontage. Additionally, as a condition of approval, a CC &R (Codes, Covenants and Restrictions) will be required identifying that a Home Owners Association (HOA) will be responsible for maintaining all common areas; which include the private driveway, guest parking spaces and any other landscaped areas. Z -538, DR -25 & TM- 60796 February 18, 2004 PaQe 5 of 9 FINDINGS OF FACT — TM -60796 1) That the site for the proposed development is physically suitable as the topography of the site is essentially flat and will be developed with five (5) single - family dwelling residences at a density allowed by the City's Zoning Code provided that a Development Plan and Zone Change (adding the Planned Development (PD) Overlay) are approved; and 2) That the design of the subdivision will not be a threat to the Health, Safety and Welfare of the citizens of Baldwin Park as the proposed project is a five (5) unit single - family detached residential subdivision which is compatible with the surrounding multi - family residential zoning designations; and 3) That the Tentative Tract Map will be consistent with the City of Baldwin Park's General Plan, provided approval of the Development Plan and Zone Change will allow for the site to be developed with detached single - family residences which is consistent with the project proposal; and 4) That development of the site is in accordance with the Tentative Tract Map will not affect future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities for the area; and 5) That the proposed project is housing balanced as the developer is providing single - family detached homes for households of varying income levels; and 6) That the proposed Tentative Tract Map is in an area serviced by Valley County Water District, which has indicated that, the proposal is not in violation of any water quality standards for the Valley County Water District. RECOMMENDATION Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council: 1) Adopt the Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact; and 2) Introduce on first reading Ordinance 1228, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ADOPTING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND APPROVING A ZONE CHANGE TO ALLOW THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) OVERLAY ON THE RG, RESIDENTIAL GARDEN ZONE ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3242 -3250 BALDWIN PARK BLVD (APPLICANT: ALTURAS ENGINEERING AND ASSOCIATES; CASE NO.; Z- 538) "; and 3) Adopt Resolution 2004 -011, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ADOPTING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN ALLOWING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A FIVE (5) UNIT SINGLE - FAMILY DETACHED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (APPLICANT. ALTURAS Z -538, DR -25 & TM -60796 February 18, 2004 Page 6 of 9 ENGINEERING AND ASSOCIATES; CASE NO.. DR -25 AND TM- 60796; LOCATION: 3242 -3250 BALDWIN PARK BLVD) "; and 4) Approve a Tentative Tract Map (TM- 60796) to subdivide one (1) lot into six (6) lots for residential purposes. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. That the subject Property shall be developed and maintained in substantial compliance with Exhibit "A ", dated February 18, 2004; and 2, That electric garage door openers shall be provided for each unit; and 3. That sectional roll -up garage doors shall be provided for each unit; and 4. That ail landscaped areas must be separated from vehicular areas by a 6" continuous concrete curb; and 5. That a decorative block wall shall be provided surrounding the property. Decorative block walls will be required along all exterior property lines that are visible from the public right -of -way and the common driveway; and 6. That the applicant shall install new landscaping and irrigate the public parkway along the entire frontage of the property. Planting and Irrigation details shall be identified on the Landscaping and Irrigation Plan to be submitted during the Plan Check phase; and 7. Each of the homes shall be provided with motion sensor lights. Exterior lighting shall be decorative and automatically controlled; and 8. Install pre -wire for an alarm system for each individual unit; and 9. Provide security lighting with motion activators at each garage and main level entrance door; and 10. A schematic landscaping plan of the landscaping shall be provided indicating the size, location, and species of all trees, shrubs, ground cover, and any other plant life proposed. The final landscaping and irrigation plan shall be submitted during plan check phase. All landscaping shall be automatically irrigated; and 11. That the applicant shall provide a letter from Waste Management agreeing to provide individual refuse pick -up services to each residential unit in lieu of providing a trash enclosure; and 12. That the applicant shall submit a copy of the proposed covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC &R) to the Planning Division; and Z -638, DR -25 & TM -60796 February 18, 2004 Page 7..of..9 13. That the CC &R shall reflect that any future addition to individual units shall be limited to a patio cover which shall not exceed 25% of the rear yard area and shall meet all zoning code requirements; and 14. Provide the following information upon the Plan Check submittal: A. Three (3) architectural plans and one (1) extra site plan for the Fire Department B. Three (3) complete sets of Plans for the City. C. Two sets of the following are required: i. Soil Reports ii. Structural Calculations iii. Title 24 Energy Calculations 15. That the applicant shall comply with all Los Angeles County Fire Department comments; and 16. All conditions of the State Map Subdivision Act and City's Subdivision Ordinance must be met prior to recordation; and 17. All conditions of the Los Angeles County Fire Department must be'met prior to recordation. A written notification or approval plan from the Fire Department must be submitted to the City; and 18. All special assessments and utilities or sewer connection fees are to be paid prior to recording the final map; and 19. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including water, gas, electricity, telephone, and cable TV (ail underground) in accordance with the respective utility companies' standards. Easements shall be provided as required; and 20. Prior to recordation of the final map, a written certification from the Water District, GTE, SCE, SCG, and Adelphia Cable stating that adequate facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed development shall be submitted to the City. Such letter must be issued by the utility company at least 30 days prior to approval of final map; and 21. A title report/guarantee showing all fee owners and interest holders must be submitted when a final map is submitted for plan check. This account must remain open until the final map is filed with the County Recorder. An updated title report/guarantee must be submitted ten (10) working days prior to approval of final map; and 22. The final map shall be based on a field survey; and Z -538, DR -25 & TM -60796 February 18, 2004 Page 8of9 23. All surveying for the proposed development will be done by the developer, including the establishment of centerline ties; and 24. The surveyor's closure sheets must be enclosed with the final map; and 25. New boundary monuments must be set in accordance with the City standards and subject to approval by the City Engineer; and 26. All easements existing prior to final map approval must be identified. If an easement is blanket or indeterminate in nature, a statement to that effect must be shown on the final map in lieu of its location; and 27. All site grading, landscaping, irrigation, street improvements, sewer and storm drain improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to final map approval; and 28. Grading plan (24" x 36 ") must be designed in compliance with recommendations of the final detailed soils and engineering geology reports. All remedial earthworks shall be incorporated on the City's standard mylar. Plans shall be submitted on the City's standard mylar; and 29. Grading plan must be signed and stamped by a registered Civil Engineer; and 30. The following off -site improvements must be existing or guaranteed for: a) Parcel must have separate and independent connections to the main sewer line. b) Install 6" laterals going in each separate unit or provide design for connection of S" main line. c) Remove and replace sections of broken curb and gutter along the frontage of proposed property. d) Remove existing driveway approaches not being utilized and replace with full height (8 ") curb. e) All proposed driveway approaches shall meet the ADA requirements. f) Install water services and gas services for the proposed development area. g) Grind 1 1/2 AC and overlay 1 1/2 AC from curb to curb along Baldwin Park Blvd. h) Plant two trees along Baldwin Park Blvd per City standard. 31. The developer shall submit to the City Engineer the total cost estimate for bonding purposed of all off -site improvements prior to approval of the final map; and 32. If the City accepts approval of the final map prior to the completion of all required public improvements, the developer shall enter into a subdivision agreement with the City and shall post the appropriate security; and Z -538, DR -25 & TM -60796 February 18, 2004 Pacte 9 of 9 33. A copy of the final map reduced to 8 '/2" x 11" shall be submitted to the Engineering Division prior to meeting with the Zoning Administrator for the subject parcel map; and 34. Approval of this tentative tract map does not constitute approval of the site plan or building footprints; and 35. The City is being served by a cable TV franchise awarded to Adelphia Cable. All residential units constructed shall be prewired and made ready for cable TV connections; and 36. After the final map records, a mylar and two blueline prints shall be submitted to the Engineering Division at no cost to the City. Final occupancy will not be granted until the recorded map is received by the Engineering Division; and 37. CC & R must be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney prior to map recordation; and 38. Provide maps in digital format to the County of Los Angeles per County requirement; and 39. The final map must be recorded within 24 months or all proceedings shall be terminated; and 40. The conditions of approval for this parcel map may be appealed to the City Council by filing a written letter together with a filing and processing fee of $300.00 with the City Clerk within twenty (20) calendar days from the date of this approval; and 41. That the applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval within one (1) year after the date of this approval. Any violations of these conditions are grounds for immediate revocation pending a duly noticed public hearing by the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal. Any costs associated with the revocation of this conditional use permit shall be paid by the applicant and /or owner; and 42. That the applicant shall sign a notarized affidavit within twenty (20) days of the date of this resolution stating that the applicant has read and accepts all of the conditions of approval. ATTACHMENTS: #1 - Exhibit "A" - Development Plan, dated February 18, 2004 #2 - Exhibit "B" - Existing Zoning and Land Use Designations #3 - Exhibit "C" - Proposed Zoning and Land Use Designation #4 - Environmental Data — Draft Negative declaration and Initial Study #5 - Ordinance 1228 #6 - Resolution 2004 -011 ATTACHMENT 491" Exhibit "A" -- Development Plan, dated February 18, 2004 ;1 J7 r= j t CITY OF BALD MN PARK PLANNING WISION k r Y, �Y �c"� 1 SITE PLAN ALTURAS ENGINEERING B ASSOCIATES DEVELOPER: j i E" _ t slmvErwa °crvr<ENCiNFrwNC. uN[s v�utmrn •Arlcra rnW, OTE DEVELO€'MENF, LLC ._ ,1 "� 5- UNITSTW0&TQREYSINGLE FAMILY DWELLING asraansErmNeas�raecT,surre +c•. wEST Cavx+A, w.u'o'aanvnso vx. xrs.slaxm FAX. eaam4"aaer Fx Mt00 -9-14 a— 9053 OTTO STREET •. TRACT MAP NO. Q60796 DOWNEY, GA 90240 (J7 f" PtisPYEPTY ao[iaESS: 3242 dAi0N9N 1'AW(81W. su Trw ar: OSCAR GONZALEZ OF oC" ENGG, L SNSPEOMN yiAa_�W �E�VA4IIG G 911pG t I I % L L t, j > 7 X Z 4 A I T -7 �5 5 K $1. J t 2 TT T 0 # r . . ..... ... .... ----- - .... ..... N Y{PAR M- IW- PLAN FLOOR PLAN ALTURAS FN(3!NrFRfNG e. ASSOCfATES DLVELOI rp OTB DEVELOPMENT. LLG 5-UNIIS TWO STOREY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING E-M.L DISS 01 TO STREET REEF TRACT MAP NO. 060796 DOWNEY• I-,A W240 SI-111T.D DY 0,SCAR G,1WA.EZ OF (X.QA ENGri d INSPEC710N =42 Wil-MIN ?AM ULVII UAI PAIK CA 91 MG 41, W Cr X Z 4 A I T -7 �5 5 K $1. J t 2 TT T 0 # r . . ..... ... .... ----- - .... ..... N Y{PAR M- IW- PLAN FLOOR PLAN ALTURAS FN(3!NrFRfNG e. ASSOCfATES DLVELOI rp OTB DEVELOPMENT. LLG 5-UNIIS TWO STOREY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING E-M.L DISS 01 TO STREET REEF TRACT MAP NO. 060796 DOWNEY• I-,A W240 SI-111T.D DY 0,SCAR G,1WA.EZ OF (X.QA ENGri d INSPEC710N =42 Wil-MIN ?AM ULVII UAI PAIK CA 91 MG 41, W 2!1 ELI J t D vf �7 --j C4 7. for. preliminary approval 11F'1 OPM PLAN I - ELEVATIONS FI- 0 ALTURAS ENGINEERING & ASSOCIATES DEVELOPMENT , LLC 5-UNITS TWO STOREY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING OT13 MACT MAP No. W796' ARCH" Mt RE gam OTTO STHM Ml DGMEY, CA 90240 KQ DAWWIN PI" 6LVD PH. 6a,014.2620 FAX, 6W014,"7 E-MM: allum2or�wf.obm ED 0. 1'4 �a IT Cj1 A. > L f n E ni 2!1 ELI J t D vf �7 --j C4 7. for. preliminary approval 11F'1 OPM PLAN I - ELEVATIONS FI- 0 ALTURAS ENGINEERING & ASSOCIATES DEVELOPMENT , LLC 5-UNITS TWO STOREY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING OT13 MACT MAP No. W796' ARCH" Mt RE gam OTTO STHM Ml DGMEY, CA 90240 KQ DAWWIN PI" 6LVD PH. 6a,014.2620 FAX, 6W014,"7 E-MM: allum2or�wf.obm ED j �.j � 'u z 101 a o I N X rl r n % LA a. . ...... ... .. 25 m 8 yi r 4 Y, yg DFVELQPrR: PLAN 2 - FLOOR PLAN At-TURAS ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES L I fts Im - c swNrMW . Lnr Pnwvm oTb DEVELOPMENT, UL(' 5-UNITS TWO STOREY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING 2 9053 OTTO STREET TRACT MAP NO, 060796 ' DOWNEY, CA SV 44) wwH OSCAR GONZALEZ OF OCWQA F=NGG, &INSPECTION cn 8aez8Rin NpAmBUM. �DM PAIK 'Am700 cp q. st ,s. "I f "�.` 4 ........ . . (D m -HT lk I T 7F . . .... V 1T A . . .. ..... . �,: ,�I �f �� -- Hi i -i F J Ju PLAN 2 ELEVATIONS ALTURAS ENGINEERING & ASSOCIATES DEVELOPER: iAND SPaVEn 'CML MERwa a t.vuaNG OT13 DEVEWFUENT, u-C 5-UNITS TWO STOREY SINGLE FAMILY DWFUING !1W CaRnm .k $TarT' wE!;T TRACT MAP No, 066796 9053 OTTO STREET DOWNEY, CA 90240 Ul OSCAR 00tak.U. OF UGUA UNGG INSPECT*N rn icy` .0 m tf3 m C'3 m Woo M cnq�j j3I 4� I 7`, k it s »� PERSPECTIVES ALTURAS ENGINEERING & ASSOCIATES ! F]fVELUPE.�' iuen stmvsv!NC•ravlc Encwsrnax; Larau ry nriniuK;•psuaim ; crvNr- OTa DEvLLOPMtNT. LLC - SEJNITS TWO STOREY SINGLE I =AMILY OWELLING asr cRarsrar�as k7,.3=E �. WF rC VNAC ffOnxinaiM '� TRACT MAP NO. ($11796 }i1. 62GAI3.?G�l1 ANC 628A1A.91.�] 9053 Of STREET '�, rnocEtm nnnezESa: DOWNEY, CA 90240 ` stag 9nL0wIN I'w'ii:uL�ro. OSCAR GGNZALEZ OF OGFOA FN&G. & INSPEC'rl(.NV j j (7,q�i3Wyy Ap([K, C0. 9Y�p5 , cnq�j j3I 4� I 7`, k it s »� Fm- tW z 75:1 A',,PfR M— —, 11 pg,� -1,6-37 iN LO�, AWFLES -OfiNTY FOSTER AVENUE RMIRDER. �T' ogw WOE cwo� Fm CL Na aA j_ y, i ww jjir. OF W1 29 frL MCMM . ALNUT FILA(�r --- ---- ---- - --- --- -- -- -1 --- --- -,-, --- --- C' PC' 104 j TO M. :V 1 1/2' IRW N'F s *,�W,,Xl M WE TAGM) RC rq�F" ruh-asEs MR PARca 4AP Ko '3- ? uw M, Z M" c7- A�l R." W, "�WLI�r'.' �, 'v na J'k -Ap Xhl F w—i7 "pq T e r1i t -a ti v e 'Fra c§ M a p no or, �7 cW'FSLU MfYw PRU. COFNER IN THE CTY OF R9,DWrN P,4RX STATE OF CAUPORNIA Mmn Prvt-�cd 'ar. kLltMA-Q RN ;Q:,;�E �SS��oq�� '9-4Ttvz CourANY: '�oj'y'y A �ZUTWf W'5VO _rKbITUCT Mario PMmmpL=' CW—, C"�10�6w. 91 14,521 RAMN O Ls 1-13 �.jALD%kjNi PARK, CA S1720f, 4 ,va 626 952 -IIS15 J. aaj LEI] RCE 28903 m '24 CA W,)941� W vroYfartv &dAF'F�Edl 3242 SALDWX VER17ON 7AVM No, civik, OF pt "'3i(l AZJSA ROAD €Rvm,,QN-E, CA 917906 C FdaUag Land €i o-. R-: TEL- NO. eZG 313-45C� pammd L%,ad U=: RG Fug EWVL can m" PkRCZL I OF PARCS.t k4AP NOL ��'5 — — 120 Fm- tW z 75:1 A',,PfR M— —, 11 pg,� -1,6-37 iN LO�, AWFLES -OfiNTY FOSTER AVENUE RMIRDER. �T' ogw WOE cwo� Fm CL Na aA j_ y, i ww jjir. OF W1 29 frL MCMM . ALNUT FILA(�r --- ---- ---- - --- --- -- -- -1 --- --- -,-, --- --- C' PC' 104 j TO M. :V 1 1/2' IRW N'F s *,�W,,Xl M WE TAGM) RC rq�F" ruh-asEs MR PARca 4AP Ko '3- ? uw M, Z M" c7- A�l R." W, "�WLI�r'.' �, 'v na J'k -Ap Xhl F w—i7 A I 2,t J/ 4 F 6 'ED 14 CITY OF BALD WIN PARK PLANNING MVIRM "pq �7 cW'FSLU MfYw PRU. COFNER J i FO Ls 1-13 "cAN SQ UF '24 W ml- A I 2,t J/ 4 F 6 'ED 14 CITY OF BALD WIN PARK PLANNING MVIRM n tive Tract- no. 0 (v 0 i 106 04 TIM M OF BALM zd PARK STATE OF CAUPORNU WESSid 4 7 � ,521 RAWCNA BLVD, W MK, HAO)VAN PARK, CA 91713f]e mm sm =my P,,CE 28903 j CA M,40 -T F;�N�T47EIQN DUST&" 'A vmu%mm-, CIVt wmu7q �E,,,,,o Ii7k-p, CANYDN R.OAP Amcm, cs 9 TAU %MAY 4.4 U.7 R•K, NO. 62-, alz-44b� "te. f"- cArc-cm iY MJ P W. r..ik5 AS PO' MAP IN Mi)k 320 PACE5 3?,--�Z�7 N �,06 ANATI haWY FOSTER AVENUE Cox per. A so W. No NLY tME M I-OT ?q FI, WX: �,ZAW,, P='^' Awl'! P-� 47M' J. ---- ------ .7 Ur/ its 'tall you SIR kw X, K sc? t- F Mr-1 f" n-yk a F1 avar A AN mam, "A C11 on too wm $us NO. won up VA FRANCISQUITO VENUE 24� 4 ....... ... .. ... 46&�6 46160' LEGEND: vWT1&0En, 1-7/13./CRECERAEM j: D 1. L.F j A 7 4 " 1,- CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ATTACHMENT "2" Exhibit "B" — Existing Zoning and Land Use Designations Exhibit "B" Existing Zoning and N Land Use Designation CASE NO.: DR -25, Z -537 and TM -60796 ADDRESS: 3242 -3250 Baldwin Park Blvd DATE: February 18, 2004 ATTACHMENT 13'" Exhibit "C" — Proposed Zoning and Land Use Designation Exhibit "C"' Proposed Zoning and N Land Use Designation CASE No.: DR -25, Z -537 and TM -60796 ADDRESS: 3242 -3250 Baldwin Park Blvd DATE: February 18, 2004 ATTACHMENT "4" Environmental Data -- Draft Negative Declaration and Initial Study INITIAL STUDY, ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST AND NEGATIVE ^W ECLAR...T1.nIt. 1, Project Title: 2. lead Agency Name and Address: 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: 4. Project Location: 5. Assessor's Parcel Number: 6. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: 7. General Plan Designation: 8. Zoning: Amendment to the City's General Plan Land Use Element to redesignate the subject property from Single - Family Residential to Residential Garden and a Zone Change from R -1, Single- Family Residential to RG, Residential Garden. A related request is for approval of an additional Zone Change to allow the planned development (PD) overlay on the Residential Garden Zone (provided the amendment to the General Plan and zone change is approved). A Development Plan to allow the construction of a five (5) unit single- family detached planned development. A supplementary request is for approval of a tentative tract map to subdivide one (1) lot into five (5) lots for residential purposes. City of Baldwin Park 14403 E. Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, CA 91706 Salvador Lopez Jr., Assistant Planner (626) 813 -5261 3242 -3250 Baldwin Park Blvd. 8555 - 004 -019 & 020 Alturas Engineering and Associates Michael Galanakis 837 Christopher St. Suite C West Covina, CA 91790 Single- Family Residential (current) Garden Multi- Family Residential (proposed) R -1 (current) RG(PD) (proposed) ................ 9. Surrounding Land Uses Incorporated in 1956, the City of Baldwin Park is located and Settings: approximately 17 miles east of downtown Los Angeles. The intersection of the 1 -10 (San Bernardino) and 1 -605 (San Gabriel River) freeways lies near the southwest corner of this 6.8 square mile City. Although Baldwin Park is predominantly a residential bedroom community, recent efforts have placed a" greater emphasis on promoting commercial and industrial land uses. However, the City is near "build- out', focusing efforts on the Redevelopment of land, especially within close proximity to the freeway. According to the 2000 Census, Baldwin Park has approximately 75,900 persons. This is more than double the population in 1960. Baldwin Park is predominantly a Hispanic working class community, although between the 1990 and 2000 Census has experienced a recent increase in its Asian population. Furthermore, the City has a considerably larger than average household size than the County average, suggesting increased pressure on the City's housing stock and the provision of services. 1-11 1� A--- - C'D %..,.,iiyo, joaldwin Park mtr#, 7Xi 3199 O O ♦ / ♦ O 4 ♦ FFV( r ♦♦ 4 r�renr Project '314te Map & Surrounding Land Uses CASE N®.: AGP -105, DR -25, Z-537, Z -538 and TM -64796 ADDRESS: 3242 -3250 Baldwin Park Blvd Nol soa } FST 137& 1 S>, 3T 10. Description of Project: Introduction, Purpose and Need for the Project: Recently, the Planning Division has received an application for a Development Plan to develop a five (5) unit single- family detached residential development. Currently, the zoning for the subject property is R -1, Single - Family Residential. In order for the development to take place, an Amendment to the City's General Plan and a zone change will be required to redesignate the property from single - family residential to multi - family residential garden. Additionally, a Zone Change to add a Planned Development (PD) overlay is required. The project will provide additional quality housing stock within the City. Project Characteristics: A request for approval of an amendment to the City's General Plan Land Use Element, to redesignate the subject property from Single - Family Residential to Residential Garden and a zone change from R -1, Single - Family Residential to RG, Residential Garden, pursuant to Section 153.631 of the City's Municipal Code. A related request is for approval of an additional zone change to allow the planned development overlay on the RG, Residential Garden Zone (provided the amendment to the General Plan and zone change is approved), pursuant to Section 153.630 of the City's Zoning Code and a Development Plan to allow the construction of a five (5) unit single- family detached planned development, pursuant to Section 153.271 of the City's Zoning Code. A supplementary request is for approval of a tentative tract reap to subdivide one (1) lot into five (5) lots for residential purposes, pursuant to Section 152.07 of the City's Municipal Code. 11. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement) No additional public approvals beyond Planning Commission and City Council will be required for this project. 11 References The following are also referenced where appropriate in the Environmental Checklist Form: a. General Plan b. Municipal Code C. Zoning Code d. Emergency Operations Coordinator e. Geological Map — Liquefaction Zones EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers, except "No Impact' answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project fails outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project - specific factor as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project - specific screening analysis.) 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including offsite as well as onsite, cumulative as well as project - level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the imp..act is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant lmpact' to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross - referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiring, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. C) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures, which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site - specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: Explanation of Checklist Judgements: I(a). No Impact. The project will not have an adverse affect on a scenic vista or result in the obstruction of any scenic views. I(b). No Impact. This project will not result in the damage or destruction of scenic resources or historical buildings. I(c). No Impact. This project will not substantially degrade the existing visual character and quality of the City of Baldwin Park. Through the Design Review process, the project has been designed so as to ensure no aesthetic offensive site, building or mechanical equipment will be open to public view. Furthermore, the project is compatible with the surrounding adjacent properties and consistent with the Design Guidelines developed by the City. I(d). No Impact. This project will not create any new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the residential zones. ......... .. ........ ......... Less Than Less Than _. Potentfally Significant Potentially Significant Less Than Significant I AESTHETICS Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Impact Mitigation Impact In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are Incar oration Would the project: ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ . a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? ❑ El 11 ■ C) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the ❑ a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring ❑ area? EJ Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- Explanation of Checklist Judgements: I(a). No Impact. The project will not have an adverse affect on a scenic vista or result in the obstruction of any scenic views. I(b). No Impact. This project will not result in the damage or destruction of scenic resources or historical buildings. I(c). No Impact. This project will not substantially degrade the existing visual character and quality of the City of Baldwin Park. Through the Design Review process, the project has been designed so as to ensure no aesthetic offensive site, building or mechanical equipment will be open to public view. Furthermore, the project is compatible with the surrounding adjacent properties and consistent with the Design Guidelines developed by the City. I(d). No Impact. This project will not create any new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the residential zones. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: l!(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not convert any type of farmland to a non- agricultural use. Less Than Potentfally Significant Less Than II AGRICULTURE RESOURCES Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact incorporation In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the iqro ect. a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring ❑ ❑ EJ Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? ® ® ® ■ b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? C) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: l!(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not convert any type of farmland to a non- agricultural use. il(b), No Impact,. The proposed project will not. conflict with the existing residential zoning designation, agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract. I1(c). No Impact. The project will not result in the conversion of farm land to non - agricultural uses. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: 111(a). No Impact. The proposed project does not conflict with any applicable air quality plan. The City of Baldwin Park is located within the South Coast Air Basin which is a non - attainment area for selective pollutants. Air pollution is a regional problem. Pollution levels in Baldwin Park are a result of not only local emissions, but also of those throughout the region. 111(b). No Impact. The project will not result in a cumulative net increase of pollutants for which the region is in non - attainment. 111(c). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not result in a cumulatively considerable net Increase of any criteria pollutant for which the region is in non - attainment. The Southern California Association of Governments and the South Coast Air Quality Management District have adopted a South Coast Air Quality Management Plan (SCAQMP). The proposed project is consistent with that plan and will not have a significant impact upon air quality. However, there will be temporary increases in air pollutant emissions during the construction phase. Construction dust and air pollution, however, will be reduced with the following procedures. Procedures to reduce air pollution include the following: 1) That the applicant adhere to the SCAQMD Rule 403 insuring the clean up construction related dirt on approach routes to the site. 2) The watering techniques shall be employed to partially mitigate the impact of construction generated dust particles. 3) Maintenance and servicing of construction equipment to minimize exhaust emissions. 4) Halting of construction activities during Stage 1 and Stage 2 smog alerts. Potentially Less Than Less Than 111 AIR QUALITY Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation n Impact Incorporation. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relief upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: ❑ El 1:1 . a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? ❑ ❑ ® . b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? C) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air ❑ ❑ ❑ quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative threshoids for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? ❑ ❑ ❑ e) Create objectionable odors affecting ,a substantial number of people? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: 111(a). No Impact. The proposed project does not conflict with any applicable air quality plan. The City of Baldwin Park is located within the South Coast Air Basin which is a non - attainment area for selective pollutants. Air pollution is a regional problem. Pollution levels in Baldwin Park are a result of not only local emissions, but also of those throughout the region. 111(b). No Impact. The project will not result in a cumulative net increase of pollutants for which the region is in non - attainment. 111(c). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not result in a cumulatively considerable net Increase of any criteria pollutant for which the region is in non - attainment. The Southern California Association of Governments and the South Coast Air Quality Management District have adopted a South Coast Air Quality Management Plan (SCAQMP). The proposed project is consistent with that plan and will not have a significant impact upon air quality. However, there will be temporary increases in air pollutant emissions during the construction phase. Construction dust and air pollution, however, will be reduced with the following procedures. Procedures to reduce air pollution include the following: 1) That the applicant adhere to the SCAQMD Rule 403 insuring the clean up construction related dirt on approach routes to the site. 2) The watering techniques shall be employed to partially mitigate the impact of construction generated dust particles. 3) Maintenance and servicing of construction equipment to minimize exhaust emissions. 4) Halting of construction activities during Stage 1 and Stage 2 smog alerts. i III(d). No Impact. The proposed project will not expose any nearby sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. III(e). No Impact. The proposed project will not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: IV(a). No Impact. The project will not have any effect on any species identified by the California Department of f=ish and Game or the US Fish and Wildlife Service. IV(b). No Impact. The project will not have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in any local or regional plans, policies regulations or by the California Department of Fish and game or by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. IV(c), No Impact. The project will not have a substantial effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. There are no federally protected wetlands within the City of Baldwin Park. IV(d). No Impact. The project will not interfere with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites as the City of Baldwin Park is within an urbanized area and not within five (5) miles of a wildlife corridor. IV(e). No Impact. The proposed project does not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources as the City of Baldwin Park does not have any ordinances protecting trees, wildlife, etc... Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than IV BIOLOGICAL. RESOURCES Significant With Significant No impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive or special status species in local or ❑ El 1:1 ■ regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California ❑ ❑ ❑ . Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fsh and Wildlife Service. C) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, fill €ng, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nurse sites El El El ■ e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, E] ® ® ■ or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: IV(a). No Impact. The project will not have any effect on any species identified by the California Department of f=ish and Game or the US Fish and Wildlife Service. IV(b). No Impact. The project will not have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in any local or regional plans, policies regulations or by the California Department of Fish and game or by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. IV(c), No Impact. The project will not have a substantial effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. There are no federally protected wetlands within the City of Baldwin Park. IV(d). No Impact. The project will not interfere with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites as the City of Baldwin Park is within an urbanized area and not within five (5) miles of a wildlife corridor. IV(e). No Impact. The proposed project does not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources as the City of Baldwin Park does not have any ordinances protecting trees, wildlife, etc... IV(f). No.. Impact_ The project proposal will not conflict with. any provisions of an adopted habitat conservation plan, natural community conservation plan or any local, regional or state habitat conservation plan, as the City's General plan does not indicate any of the referenced plans which could be affected by the project proposal. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: V(a). No Impact. The project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. V(b). No Impact. The project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource. V(c). No Impact. The project will not directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or geological feature. V(d). No Impact. The project. is not expected to disturb any human remains. The City of Baldwin Park does not have any cemeteries. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than V CULTURAL RESOURCES Significant with Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: El 1:1 a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15084.5? issued by the State Geoiogist for the area or based on other C) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geological feature? ❑ ❑ 1:1 El d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Mines and Geo!p& Special Publication 42_ ® El El ® 11 Explanation of Checklist Judgements: V(a). No Impact. The project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. V(b). No Impact. The project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource. V(c). No Impact. The project will not directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or geological feature. V(d). No Impact. The project. is not expected to disturb any human remains. The City of Baldwin Park does not have any cemeteries. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than VI GEOLOGY ARID SOILS Significant with Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geoiogist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geo!p& Special Publication 42_ ® El El ® 11 0 11 El 0 N ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic - related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? C) Be Located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and i °f potentially result in on or offsite landslide, lateral spreading, L� subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?. ❑ ® ❑ d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 -1 -B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risk to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or aitemative wastewater disposal systems [� j�' where sews. are net available far the disposal of E_' ` ' ....-- wastewater? HAZARDS AND Explanation of Checklist Judgements: VI(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects involving the rupture of a known earthquake fault. According to the City's General plan, there are no active faults within the City of Baldwin Park, therefore no Alquist- Priolo Special Study Zones are within the City. Although there are no active faults within the City of Baldwin Park, there are several major faults surrounding the City, which have the potential for causing major damage; however, the occurrence of direct ground rupture is not likely according to the City's General Plan. Potential for this type of activity is similar throughout Southern California and no unique or unusual risk is posed by the proposed project. According to the Seismic Hazard Zones Map dated 3199 from the State Department of Geology and Mines, the project area is not within a liquefaction zone. VI(b). No Impact. The City is located in a relatively flat urbanized area with a very low potential for wind and water erosion of soils. VI(c). No Impact. The City is not located on a geological unit or soil that is unstable and could result in landslide, spreading liquefaction or collapse according to the Seismic Hazards Zone Map dated March 25, 1999 from the State geologists Office. VI(d). No Impact. The City and the project area are located on a very low to low expansive soil as defined in Table 18 -1 -B of the UBC (1997). Therefore the project will not create any risk to life or property. VI(e). No Impact. The proposed project's location does have sewers available for the disposal of wastewater. Furthermore, the soils at the proposed location can adequately support the use of the sewers. Less Than VII HAZARDS AND Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact HAZARDOLISMATERIALS Impact MiVgation Impact Incorporation Would the project. F1 a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident ❑ ❑ ❑ conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? ❑ C) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one- quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? E) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project ❑ ❑ ❑ result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency ® El 1:1 evacuation elan? Vill HYDROLOGY AND WATER h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wiidland fires, including where Less Than wiidlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where Significant With Significant residences are intermixed with wiidlands? QUALITY Impact Explanation of Checklist Judgements: VII(a). No Impact. The project will not create a significant hazard to the public through the routine transport use or disposal of hazardous materials. It is not anticipated that there will be any hazardous materials associated with the proposed project. VII(b). No Impact. There will be no significant hazard to the public or the environment regarding the upset or release of hazardous materials into the environment. VII(c). No Impact. The project will not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous material, substances or waste within one - quarter of an existing school. VII(d). No Impact. The proposed project is not located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous materials sites. VII(e). No Impact. The project is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public airport, and therefore would not create a hazard to people residing or working in the area. VII(f). No Impact. Since the project is not within the vicinity of a private airstrip, the project would not create a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area. VII(g). No Impact. According to the City's Emergency Operations Coordinator, the project proposal will not impair implementation or physically interfere with the City's adopted emergency plan or emergency evacuation plan. VII(h), No Impact. The project proposal is within a highly urbanized area and will therefor not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires. Less Than Vill HYDROLOGY AND WATER Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact QUALITY Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project, ❑ ❑ El 0 a) violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre - existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in ® L cj ❑ substantial erosion or siltation on or offsite? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount ❑ ❑ ❑ of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on or offsite? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: VIII(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements as the facility will generate minimal amounts of solid waste typical for this particular residential use. In addition, the applicant will be required to implement the requirements of the National Pollution Elimination Discharge System (NPDES), which regulates water quality runoff. VIII(b). No Impact. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies or interfere with groundwater recharge. VIII(c). No Impact. The proposed project will not substantially alter the course of an adjacent stream or river, which would result in erosion, or siltation of the site as there is no stream or river running through the City, which the exception of the channelized San Gabriel River. VIII(d). No Impact. The proposed project will not substantially alter the drainage patterns of the City and will not alter the course of a stream or river, as there are no streams or rivers in the City with the exception of the channelized San Gabriel River. VIII(e), No Impact. The proposed project will not create or contribute run -off, which would exceed the capacity of the existing storm drain system. Nor will the proposed project provide any polluted run -off. VIII(f). No Impact. The project will not degrade the existing water quality because of the limited amount of impervious surfaces associated with the project. VIII(g). No Impact. The project proposal will not place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area. Furthermore, the City is not within a Flood Zone. Federal Emergency Management Association (FEMA) has the City of Baldwin Park classified as Zone C- 060100. VIII(h). No Impact. The proposal is not within a 100 -year flood hazard area. FEMA has classified the City of Baldwin Park as Zone C- 050100. VIII(i). No Impact. The project proposal will not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss involving flooding as a direct result of the failure of a levee or dam. Although the Santa Fe dam is located directly adjacent to the City across Arrow Highway, large -scale flooding as a result of failure of this particular dam is negligible due to the design of the dam in that water is present in the dam only a few months of the year. Less Than V111 HYDROLOGY AND WATER potentially significant Mess Than Significant With Significant. No Impact QUALITY Impact Mitigation impact Incorporation e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage ❑ systems or provide substantial additional sources of olluted runoff. ❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance plate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? ❑ ® ❑ h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? ❑ ® ❑ ■ i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: VIII(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements as the facility will generate minimal amounts of solid waste typical for this particular residential use. In addition, the applicant will be required to implement the requirements of the National Pollution Elimination Discharge System (NPDES), which regulates water quality runoff. VIII(b). No Impact. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies or interfere with groundwater recharge. VIII(c). No Impact. The proposed project will not substantially alter the course of an adjacent stream or river, which would result in erosion, or siltation of the site as there is no stream or river running through the City, which the exception of the channelized San Gabriel River. VIII(d). No Impact. The proposed project will not substantially alter the drainage patterns of the City and will not alter the course of a stream or river, as there are no streams or rivers in the City with the exception of the channelized San Gabriel River. VIII(e), No Impact. The proposed project will not create or contribute run -off, which would exceed the capacity of the existing storm drain system. Nor will the proposed project provide any polluted run -off. VIII(f). No Impact. The project will not degrade the existing water quality because of the limited amount of impervious surfaces associated with the project. VIII(g). No Impact. The project proposal will not place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area. Furthermore, the City is not within a Flood Zone. Federal Emergency Management Association (FEMA) has the City of Baldwin Park classified as Zone C- 060100. VIII(h). No Impact. The proposal is not within a 100 -year flood hazard area. FEMA has classified the City of Baldwin Park as Zone C- 050100. VIII(i). No Impact. The project proposal will not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss involving flooding as a direct result of the failure of a levee or dam. Although the Santa Fe dam is located directly adjacent to the City across Arrow Highway, large -scale flooding as a result of failure of this particular dam is negligible due to the design of the dam in that water is present in the dam only a few months of the year. -V1I10). No Impact. Since Baldwin Park is an inland City, it could not experience a tsunami and the few bodies of water in Baldwin Park are small enough that they would not be able to produce a seiche large enough to cause any damage. Furthermore, Baldwin Park is an urbanized City with no hillsides to speak of and therefore, damage caused by mudflow would be negligible. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: IX(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Zone Change and General Plan Amendment will not physically divide an established community but will increase the allowable density previously allowed in the single- family residential zone. The maximum permitted density for the current single - family zoning is 0 to 8.7 du/ac. The maximum permitted density for the newly created residential garden zoning will be 8.8 to 12 du/ac. This increase in moderate density will allow for the construction of a five (5) unit residential planned development provided that the development meets all standards and criteria set forth in the City's Zoning Code and Design Guidelines. Once the zoning on the said parcel is changed, pursuant to this approval, the lots will share a common rear lot line with an R -1 zoned lot, (provided an amendment to the General Plan and a Zone Change is approved for the lots to the north and south of the said property). In order to lessen the effects of multi- family developments, the City's Zoning Code requires, as part of the development standards, a rear yard depth of not less than twenty (20) feet. Hence, a zone variance will be required for less than the minimum required rear yard setback. 1X(b). No Impact. The proposed project is not in conflict with any land use plan, policy or regulation of an agency that has jurisdiction over the project, in that the City has initiated an amendment to the City's General Plan Land Use Element to redesignate the adjacent properties from single- family residential to multi - family residential garden. Thus, not creating any conflict with the land use map (proposed to be amended) once the City initiated request is approved. IX(c). No Impact. Currently the City has no habitat conservation plans or natural community conservation plans which would possible be affected by the proposed project. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than lX LAND USE AND PLANNING Significant with Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact InCDr OratlOn Would the project. ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ a) Physically divide an established community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, ❑ ® 1:1 ■ local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoidin or miti ating an bnvironmenial effect? ❑ 11 El C) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: IX(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Zone Change and General Plan Amendment will not physically divide an established community but will increase the allowable density previously allowed in the single- family residential zone. The maximum permitted density for the current single - family zoning is 0 to 8.7 du/ac. The maximum permitted density for the newly created residential garden zoning will be 8.8 to 12 du/ac. This increase in moderate density will allow for the construction of a five (5) unit residential planned development provided that the development meets all standards and criteria set forth in the City's Zoning Code and Design Guidelines. Once the zoning on the said parcel is changed, pursuant to this approval, the lots will share a common rear lot line with an R -1 zoned lot, (provided an amendment to the General Plan and a Zone Change is approved for the lots to the north and south of the said property). In order to lessen the effects of multi- family developments, the City's Zoning Code requires, as part of the development standards, a rear yard depth of not less than twenty (20) feet. Hence, a zone variance will be required for less than the minimum required rear yard setback. 1X(b). No Impact. The proposed project is not in conflict with any land use plan, policy or regulation of an agency that has jurisdiction over the project, in that the City has initiated an amendment to the City's General Plan Land Use Element to redesignate the adjacent properties from single- family residential to multi - family residential garden. Thus, not creating any conflict with the land use map (proposed to be amended) once the City initiated request is approved. IX(c). No Impact. Currently the City has no habitat conservation plans or natural community conservation plans which would possible be affected by the proposed project. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: X(a). No Impact. The project will not result in the loss of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region or the residents of the State. There are no known mineral resources located within the City of Baldwin Park according to the City's General Plan. X(b). No Impact. The project will not result in the loss of a locally important mineral resource recovery site, as the City's General Plan does not indicate any known mineral resources. Less Than Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant V e a rc..rs. r.. .. �..� MINEEI IAL RES JR ES ui n'fcant g i � with Significant g i N Impact p with Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Mitigation incorporation Would the project, ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? ❑ . ■ b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general Ian, specific plan, or other land use plan? ® ❑ ❑ Explanation of Checklist Judgements: X(a). No Impact. The project will not result in the loss of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region or the residents of the State. There are no known mineral resources located within the City of Baldwin Park according to the City's General Plan. X(b). No Impact. The project will not result in the loss of a locally important mineral resource recovery site, as the City's General Plan does not indicate any known mineral resources. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XI(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not result in the exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the City's General flan, noise ordinance or applicable standards of other agencies. Noise levels would increase temporarily during the construction phase of the project. Construction is regulated by the City and is addressed in the Municipal Code to limit overall noise levels to an acceptable range. Increased population and development will result in increasing noise from a variety of sources commonly found in an urban environment (human activities, mechanical equipment, automobiles, pets, etc.). This increase is considered to be less than significant. XI(b). No Impact. The project will not result in the exposure of persons to generation of excess ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than XI NOISE Significant with significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Mould the project result in. ® ❑ . a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or 22RHcabIe standards of other agencies? ® ❑ ❑ b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? G) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project ❑ E—] expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? ❑ 13 f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XI(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not result in the exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the City's General flan, noise ordinance or applicable standards of other agencies. Noise levels would increase temporarily during the construction phase of the project. Construction is regulated by the City and is addressed in the Municipal Code to limit overall noise levels to an acceptable range. Increased population and development will result in increasing noise from a variety of sources commonly found in an urban environment (human activities, mechanical equipment, automobiles, pets, etc.). This increase is considered to be less than significant. XI(b). No Impact. The project will not result in the exposure of persons to generation of excess ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels. 3 XI(c). No Impact. The project will not result in a substantial permanent increase of ambient noise levels. XI(d). No Impact. The project will not result in a substantial or periodic increase in ambient noise levels above levels that are existing. XI(e). No Impact. The City of Baldwin Park is not located within an airport land use plan not within two miles of an airport. Therefore, the amendment will not expose people to excessive noise levels. XI(f). No Impact. The City of Baldwin Park is not within the vicinity of a private airstrip. Therefore, the amendment will not expose people to excessive noise levels. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XII(a). Less Than Significant Impact, The provision of five (5) residential units will increase the population of the area, which may result in higher levels of traffic and increased demands on municipal agencies. The increase in population will not create a significant impact. According to the Population and Housing Estimates for Individual Counties from the Department of Finance, a slight increase would be expected to occur with an average of 4.4 persons per dwelling, which creates an approximate increase of twenty -two (22) persons. The potential result of increased manpower and equipment needed to serve citywide demands are evaluated annually. The provision of five (5) residential units is considered a beneficial impact. The project is in compliance with the City's General Plan. XII(b). No impact. The proposed project will not displace any existing housing units that will necessitate the replacement or construction of residential units. XII(c). No Impact. The proposed project will not displace substantial number of individuals /families necessitating the construction of replacement housing as the development will be in compliance with the General Plan and applicable zoning regulations. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than XII POPULATION AND HOUSING Significant with Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incor oration Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and ® ® ■ El businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? El ❑ El b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? I El [I [1 . C) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XII(a). Less Than Significant Impact, The provision of five (5) residential units will increase the population of the area, which may result in higher levels of traffic and increased demands on municipal agencies. The increase in population will not create a significant impact. According to the Population and Housing Estimates for Individual Counties from the Department of Finance, a slight increase would be expected to occur with an average of 4.4 persons per dwelling, which creates an approximate increase of twenty -two (22) persons. The potential result of increased manpower and equipment needed to serve citywide demands are evaluated annually. The provision of five (5) residential units is considered a beneficial impact. The project is in compliance with the City's General Plan. XII(b). No impact. The proposed project will not displace any existing housing units that will necessitate the replacement or construction of residential units. XII(c). No Impact. The proposed project will not displace substantial number of individuals /families necessitating the construction of replacement housing as the development will be in compliance with the General Plan and applicable zoning regulations. �3 Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XIII(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project should not result in the additional need for new or altered fire protection and will not alter acceptable service ratios or response times. Whether or not the project would require additional police service or fire staff depends on the total requirements of the City and County. Currently the City is served by Station 29 which is located at Los Angeles Street and Maine Avenue. XII1(b). Less Than Significant Impact. Public services are already in place to serve this development. An increase in public services would be considered less than significant. The project may result in some increase in police calls. Xlll(c). Less Than Significant Impact. The net impact of the project on the school facilities will be minimal. There would be a slight increase in local school enrollment. If viewed as an isolated occurrence, the project would result in an estimated increase in population of up to 22 persons (5 units x 4.4 persons per unit) with up to nine (9) school -aged children (40% of the total between the ages of 0 -20). School impact fees collected prior to occupancy are intended to offset any potential demand for new school facilities. School Development fees in the amount of $2.14/s.f. shall be paid to the Baldwin Park Unified School District prior to obtaining building permits. These fees are considered to provide full and complete school facilities. XIII(d). Less Than Significant impact. Although residential development for this proposed project will increase the population, the project is not expected to significantly impact the City's existing parks or recreational facilities. The City's Development Tax collected prior to occupancy is intended to offset any potential demand for recreational facilities. XIII(e). No impact. The proposed project will not require the need for new or physically altered public facilities. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than X111 PUBLIC SERVICES Significant with Significant. N.o Impart. Impact Mitigation impact Incorporation Would the project: result in substantfal adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered ❑ ❑ governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause El significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ■ N ❑ ❑ ■ a) Fire protection? b) Police protection? C) Schools? d) Parks? e) Other public facilities? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XIII(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project should not result in the additional need for new or altered fire protection and will not alter acceptable service ratios or response times. Whether or not the project would require additional police service or fire staff depends on the total requirements of the City and County. Currently the City is served by Station 29 which is located at Los Angeles Street and Maine Avenue. XII1(b). Less Than Significant Impact. Public services are already in place to serve this development. An increase in public services would be considered less than significant. The project may result in some increase in police calls. Xlll(c). Less Than Significant Impact. The net impact of the project on the school facilities will be minimal. There would be a slight increase in local school enrollment. If viewed as an isolated occurrence, the project would result in an estimated increase in population of up to 22 persons (5 units x 4.4 persons per unit) with up to nine (9) school -aged children (40% of the total between the ages of 0 -20). School impact fees collected prior to occupancy are intended to offset any potential demand for new school facilities. School Development fees in the amount of $2.14/s.f. shall be paid to the Baldwin Park Unified School District prior to obtaining building permits. These fees are considered to provide full and complete school facilities. XIII(d). Less Than Significant impact. Although residential development for this proposed project will increase the population, the project is not expected to significantly impact the City's existing parks or recreational facilities. The City's Development Tax collected prior to occupancy is intended to offset any potential demand for recreational facilities. XIII(e). No impact. The proposed project will not require the need for new or physically altered public facilities. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than XIV RECREATION Significant with Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation a) would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational ❑ ❑ facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? El b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Explanation of Checklist Judgements; XIV(a). No Impact. The proposed project is not expected to significantly impact the City's existing parks or recreational facilities. XIV(b). No Impact. The proposed project does not require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XV(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will result in an estimated increase in traffic generated by the net gain of 5 residential units, which will be less than a significant impact. XV(b). No Impact. The proposal will not exceed a level of service standard established by the County Congestion Management Agency for designated roads or highways. XV(c). No Impact. The proposal will not result in a change or increase in air traffic patterns or levels that result in substantial safety risks. XV(d). No Impact. The proposal will not increase hazards due to a design feature or incompatible uses, as the project does not include new construction of streets. XV(e). No Impact. The project will not result in inadequate emergency access. XV(f). No Impact. The proposed project will not have an impact on existing parking facilities or create a need for new parking as the site meets the required parking standards contained within the Municipal Code. Private parking areas contained within the required two car garages will be provided for each dwelling unit as well as guest parking. XV(g). No Impact. The proposed project will not conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than XV TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact incorporation Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of ❑ ❑ ® ❑ vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? E] ❑ ❑ b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ C) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? ❑ ❑ ❑ N d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incom atibie uses e.., farm equipment)? ❑ ❑ F1 ❑ ® 1:1 ❑ ® . ■ e) Result in inadequate emergency access? f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XV(a). Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will result in an estimated increase in traffic generated by the net gain of 5 residential units, which will be less than a significant impact. XV(b). No Impact. The proposal will not exceed a level of service standard established by the County Congestion Management Agency for designated roads or highways. XV(c). No Impact. The proposal will not result in a change or increase in air traffic patterns or levels that result in substantial safety risks. XV(d). No Impact. The proposal will not increase hazards due to a design feature or incompatible uses, as the project does not include new construction of streets. XV(e). No Impact. The project will not result in inadequate emergency access. XV(f). No Impact. The proposed project will not have an impact on existing parking facilities or create a need for new parking as the site meets the required parking standards contained within the Municipal Code. Private parking areas contained within the required two car garages will be provided for each dwelling unit as well as guest parking. XV(g). No Impact. The proposed project will not conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation. i Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XVI(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. XVI(b). No Impact. The proposed project will not require the construction of now water or wastewater treatment facilities or the expansion of existing facilities. XVI(c). No Impact. The project site is not within a flood zone area. The increase in impervious surfaces primarily due to the proposed street will marginally increase runoff from the project area. The project will be required to provide satisfactory drainage to available storm drains. XVI(d). No Impact. The project will not affect existing water supplies provided to the City. XVI(e). No Impact. The proposed amendment does not involve a project that will result in a determination by the watershed treatment provider that it has adequate capacity to serve a demand. XVI(f). Less Than Significant impact. A net gain in 5 residential units will increase the demand for solid waste disposal; however, the level of solid waste generation is small in comparison to total solid waste disposal on a regional level. The City in an effort to reduce the amount of solid waste disposed, currently provides recycling containers to residents for the recycling of paper, glass, plastic and aluminum. Waste Management, the City waste hauler utilize's the Puente Hills landfill which has enough permitted capacity to accommodate the proposed project's waste disposal needs. XVI(g). No Impact. The proposed project will comply with all federal, state and local statutes relating to solid waste. Less Than X UTILITIES AND SERVICE Potentially significant Less Than Significant +Alith Significant tvn Impact. SYSTEMS Impact Mitigation impact Incorporation Would the project: , ❑ ® 11 ■ a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing LJ facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? G) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the ❑ construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? ❑ F-1 11 ■ d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has ❑ adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? El 1:1 g) Comply with federal; state, and local statutes Jand regulations related to solid waste? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XVI(a). No Impact. The proposed project will not exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. XVI(b). No Impact. The proposed project will not require the construction of now water or wastewater treatment facilities or the expansion of existing facilities. XVI(c). No Impact. The project site is not within a flood zone area. The increase in impervious surfaces primarily due to the proposed street will marginally increase runoff from the project area. The project will be required to provide satisfactory drainage to available storm drains. XVI(d). No Impact. The project will not affect existing water supplies provided to the City. XVI(e). No Impact. The proposed amendment does not involve a project that will result in a determination by the watershed treatment provider that it has adequate capacity to serve a demand. XVI(f). Less Than Significant impact. A net gain in 5 residential units will increase the demand for solid waste disposal; however, the level of solid waste generation is small in comparison to total solid waste disposal on a regional level. The City in an effort to reduce the amount of solid waste disposed, currently provides recycling containers to residents for the recycling of paper, glass, plastic and aluminum. Waste Management, the City waste hauler utilize's the Puente Hills landfill which has enough permitted capacity to accommodate the proposed project's waste disposal needs. XVI(g). No Impact. The proposed project will comply with all federal, state and local statutes relating to solid waste. Explanation of Checklist Judgements, XVII(a). No Impact. The proposed project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self - sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of major periods of California history or prehistory. XVII(b). No Impact. The project does not have impacts that are individually limited by cumulatively considerable. A majority of the environmental factors analyzed within this initial study will have an impact by the proposed project. XVII(c). No Impact. The project does not create environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. Less Than XVII MANDATORY FINDINGS OF Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact SIGNIFICANCE Impact Mitigation Impact Incor oration Does the project: a) does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or anima3 or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or rehisto ? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ( "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a ❑ ❑ project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) ❑ ❑ ❑ c) Does the project have environmental effects which wit! cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Explanation of Checklist Judgements, XVII(a). No Impact. The proposed project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self - sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of major periods of California history or prehistory. XVII(b). No Impact. The project does not have impacts that are individually limited by cumulatively considerable. A majority of the environmental factors analyzed within this initial study will have an impact by the proposed project. XVII(c). No Impact. The project does not create environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. ATTACHMENT 99577 Ordinance 1228 ORDINANCE NO. 1228 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ADOPTING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND APPROVING A ZONE CHANGE TO ALLOW THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) OVERLAY ON THE RG, RESIDENTIAL GARDEN ZONE ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3242 -3250 BALDWIN PARK BLVD (APPLICANT: ALTURAS ENGINEERING AND ASSOCIATES; CASE NO.: Z -538), THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby find, determine and declare as follows: a) That the owner of certain real property filed an application for a change of zone from RG, Residential Garden to RG (PD), Residential Garden Planned Development for real property located at 3948 -58 Baldwin Park Blvd., described more particularly in the said application which is on file in the office of the Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City; and b) That pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Planning and Zoning Law (Sections 658000 et seq. of the Government Code of the State of California), studies were commenced for the purposes of amending the Zoning Map of the City of Baldwin Park; and c) That a duly noticed public hearing was held upon said matter by the Planning Commission, and based upon the evidence presented, it was determined that the public necessity, convenience, and general welfare warranted that it recommend approval of the reclassification to RG (PD); and d) That the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said matter and based upon the evidence presented and each member of the Council being familiar with the site, it was determined that the public interest, necessity, convenience and general welfare warrant the approval of the Planning Commission recommendation and approval of the change in zone classification, herein described from RG to RG (PD). SECTION 2. That notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 153.630 - 153.646 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code, the Zoning Classification of the property be and is hereby reclassified from RG to zone RG (PD). SECTION 3. That the City Council at the time of the public hearing on the above matter reviewed and considered the proposed Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact, and comments relating thereto. That the City Council, based on its public review, does hereby approve the proposed Negative Declaration, since there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant impact upon the environment. Ordinance 1228 SECTION 4. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause a copy of the same to be published in a manner prescribed by law, and shall forward a copy of the same to the Secretary of the Planning Commission. The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall file the Notice of Determination and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact. PASSED AND APPROVED ON THE 18th day of February 2004 MANUEL LOZANO, MAYOR ATTEST: KATHLEEN SESSMAN DEPUTY CITY CLERK STATE OF CALIFORNIA } COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES } ss: CITY OF BALDWIN PARK } I, KATHLEEN SESSMAN, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was regularly introduced and placed upon it's first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on February 18, 2004. That there after said Ordinance 1228 was duly approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBER: NOES: COUNCILMEMBER: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBER: KATHLEEN SESSMAN DEPUTY CITY CLERK ATTACHMENT 666" Resolution 2004 -091 RESOLUTION 2004 -011 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ADOPTING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN ALLOWING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A FIVE (5) UNIT SINGLE- FAMILY DETACHED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (APPLICANT: ALTURAS ENGINEERING AND ASSOCIATES; CASE NO.: DR -25; LOCATION: 3242 -3250 BALDWIN PARK BLVD.). THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby find, determine, and declare as follows: a) That an application ( "Application ") for a Development Plan was submitted on behalf of the owners of certain real property, located at 3242 -3250 Baldwin Park Blvd. in the City of Baldwin Park, described more particularly in the Applications on file with the Planning Division; and b) That the Development Plan is requesting approval to allow the construction of a five (5) unit Single - Family Detached Planned Development pursuant to Government Code Section 65450; and c) That on January 28, 2004, a duly noticed public hearing was held on said Applications by the Planning Commission, and based upon evidence presented including applicable staff reports and each member of the Commission being familiar with the properties, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the Development Plan; and d) That a duly noticed public hearing was held on said Applications by the City Council, and based upon evidence presented including applicable staff reports and each member of the Council being familiar with the properties, it was determined that the facts as required by the Baldwin Park Municipal Code for the granting of such Applications are present and that the Development Plan should be approved. SECTION 2. That the Development Plan, as herein described by and the same hereby is approved subject to the following conditions of approval. a) That the subject Property shall be developed and maintained in substantial compliance with Exhibit "A ", dated February 18, 2004; and b) That electric garage door openers shall be provided for each unit; and Resolution 2004 -011 Page 2 C) That sectional roll -up garage doors shall be provided for each unit; and d) That all landscaped areas must be separated from vehicular areas by a 6" continuous concrete curb; and e) That a decorative block wall shall be provided surrounding the property. Decorative block walls will be required along all exterior property lines that are visible from the public right -of -way and the common driveway; and f) That the applicant shall install new landscaping and irrigate the public parkway along the entire frontage of the property. Planting and Irrigation details shall be identified on the Landscaping and Irrigation Plan to be submitted during the Plan Check phase; and g) Each of the homes shall be provided with motion sensor lights. Exterior lighting shall be decorative and automatically controlled; and h) Install pre -wire for an alarm system for each individual unit; and i) Provide security lighting with motion activators at each garage and main level entrance door; and j) A schematic landscaping plan of the landscaping shall be provided indicating the size, location, and species of all trees, shrubs, ground cover, and any other plant life proposed. The final landscaping and irrigation plan shall be submitted during plan check phase. All landscaping shall be automatically irrigated; and k) That the applicant shall provide a letter from Waste Management agreeing to provide individual refuse pick -up services to each residential unit in lieu of providing a trash enclosure; and 1) That the applicant shall submit a copy of the proposed covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC &R) to the Planning Division; and m) That the CC &R shall reflect that any future addition to individual units shall be limited to a patio cover which shall not exceed 25% of the rear yard area and shall meet all zoning code requirements; and n) Provide the following information upon the Plan Check submittal: 1. Three (3) architectural plans and one (1) extra site plan for the Fire Department 2. Three (3) complete sets of Plans for the City. Resolution 2004 -011 Page 3 3. Two sets of the following are required: i. Soil Reports ii. Structural Calculations iii. Title 24 Energy Calculations o) That the applicant shall comply with all Los Angeles County Fire Department comments; and p) All conditions of the State Map Subdivision Act and City's Subdivision Ordinance must be met prior to recordation; and q) All conditions of the Los Angeles County Fire Department must be met prior to recordation. A written notification or approval plan from the Fire Department must be submitted to the City; and r) All special assessments and utilities or sewer connection fees are to be paid prior to recording the final map; and s) The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including water, gas, electricity, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the respective utility companies' standards. Easements shall be provided as required; and t) Prior to recordation of the final map, a written certification from the Water District, GTE, SCE, SCG, and Adelphia Cable stating that adequate facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed development shall be submitted to the City. Such letter must be issued by the utility company at least 30 days prior to approval of final map; and u) A title report/guarantee showing all fee owners and interest holders must be submitted when a final map is submitted for plan check. This account must remain open until the final map is filed with the County Recorder. An updated title report/guarantee must be submitted ten (10) working days prior to approval of final map; and V) The final map shall be based on a field survey; and w) All surveying for the proposed development will be done by the developer, including the establishment of centerline ties; and x) The surveyor's closure sheets must be enclosed with the final map; and y) New boundary monuments must be set in accordance with the City standards and subject to approval by the City Engineer; and z) All easements existing prior to final map approval must be identified. If an easement is blanket or indeterminate in nature, a statement to that effect must be shown on the final map in lieu of its location; and Resolution 2004 -011 Page 4 aa) All site grading, landscaping, irrigation, street improvements, sewer and storm drain improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to final map approval; and bb) Grading plan (24" x 36 ") must be designed in compliance with recommendations of the final detailed soils and engineering geology reports. All remedial earthworks shall be incorporated on the City's standard mylar. Plans shall be submitted on the City's standard mylar; and cc) Grading plan must be signed and stamped by a registered Civil Engineer; and dd) The following off -site improvements must be existing or guaranteed for: 1. Parcel must have separate and independent connections to the main sewer line. 2. Install 6" laterals going in each separate unit or provide design for connection of 8" main line. 3. Remove and replace sections of broken curb and gutter along the frontage of proposed property. 4. Remove existing driveway approaches not being utilized and replace with full height (8 ") curb. 5. All proposed driveway approaches shall meet the ADA ,requirements. 6. Install water services and gas services for the proposed development area. 7. Grind 1 1/2 AC and overlay 1 '/2 AC from curb to curb along Baldwin Park Blvd. 8. Plant two trees along Baldwin Park Blvd per City standard. ee) The developer shall submit to the City Engineer the total cost estimate for bonding purposed of all off -site improvements prior to approval of the final map; and ff) If the City accepts approval of the final map prior to the completion of all required public improvements, the developer shall enter into a subdivision agreement with the City and shall post the appropriate security; and gg) A copy of the final map reduced to 8 1/2" x 11" shall be submitted to the Engineering Division prior to meeting with the Zoning Administrator for the subject parcel map; and hh) Approval of this tentative tract map does not constitute approval of the site plan or building footprints; and ii) The City is being served by a cable TV franchise awarded to Adelphia Cable. All residential units constructed shall be prewired and made ready for cable TV connections; and Resolution 2304 -011 Page 5 ji.) After the f i.nal map records, a mylar and two blueline prints shall be submitted to the Engineering Division at no cost to the City. Final occupancy will not be granted until the recorded map is received by the Engineering Division; and kk) CC & R must be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney prior to map recordation; and 11) Provide maps in digital format to the County of Los Angeles per County requirement; and mm) The final map must be recorded within 24 months or all proceedings shall be terminated; and nn) The conditions of approval for this parcel map may be appealed to the City Council by filing a written letter together with a filing and processing fee of $303.03 with the City Clerk within twenty (20) calendar days from the date of this approval; and oo) That the applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval within one (1) year after the date of this approval. Any violations of these conditions are grounds for immediate revocation pending a duly noticed public hearing by the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal. Any costs associated with the revocation of this conditional use permit shall be paid by the applicant and /or owner; and pp) That the applicant shall sign a notarized affidavit within twenty (23) days of the date of this resolution stating that the applicant has read and accepts all of the conditions of approval. SECTION 3. That the City Council at the time of the public hearing on the above matter reviewed and considered the proposed Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact. That the City Council, based upon its public review, does hereby find that said Negative Declaration has been prepared and was considered pursuant to the provisions and guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act, and hereby adopts the Negative Declaration since there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant impact on the environment. SECTION 4, The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and forward a copy hereof to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and the Applicant. PASSED AND APPROVED this 18t day of February, 2004. MANUEL LOZANO MAYOR Resolution 2004 -011 9m m. ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA } COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK } I, KATHLEEN SESMAN, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park at a regular meeting of the City Council on February 18, 2004, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: KATHLEEN SESSMAN DEPUTY CITY CLERK ITT OF BALDW NT PARK BALDININ NOTICE OF PUBLIC FEARING P -A, R K TO: Property Owners within a 300 foot radius. FROM: Baldwin Park City Clerk SUBJECT: Z -538, DR -25 and TM -60796 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT a public hearing to consider the following cases will be held at 7:00 P.M. by the Planning Commission of the Cityof Baldwin Park in City Council Chambers, 14403 E. Pacific Avenue, on Wednesday, February 18, 2004. All interested parties may appear and be heard at that time. CASE NO: Z -538, DR -25, and TM -60796 ADDRESS: 3242 -3250 Baldwin Park Blvd. REQUEST: A request for approval of a zone change to allow the planned devel opm ent overlay on the RG, Residential Garden Zone (provided the amendmentto the General Plan and zone change is approved), pursuant to Section 153.630 of the C ity's Zon in g Code and a Developm ent P I an toalIow the construction of five (5)unit single- familydetached planned development, pursuant to Section 151271 of the City's Zoning Code. A supplementary request is for approval of a tentative tract map to subdivide one (1) lot into six (6) lots for residential purposes, pursuant to Section 152.07 of the City's Municipal Code. An environmental assessment has been completed for Z -538, DR -25 and TM- 60796, As a result, an initial study has been completed and it has been determined that the case will require a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. The case is available for review during normal business hours. OS /1./ \1 AREA MAP ! X16 w+i V VV Not to Scale FC(SV) If in the future anyone wishes to challenge a decision of the City Council in the court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described above or in written correspondence delivered to theCity Council at, or prior to, the Public Hearing. If further information is desired on the above case, please contact the Planning Division at (626) 813 -5261 and referto the case number. If you are aware of someone who would be interested in becoming informed of the contemplated actions, please pass this notice along as a community service. Para information en espanol accerca de este caso favor de llarnar a[ (626) 813» 5261. thleen Sessman eputy City Clerk CL CD CD C CD C2- CD CD r{. 70 cn 70 w 0 (D O CL O CD CL cn 0 S7� CC/D\ n CD /w V) -4 cCn coo (D © o � S2 .� -0 -0 .0 NR R I IV N IV IV N � w w w CrJ o (7 ® w W W W o �q /WRY cr) i D m -D (A) ...► .R REw ...r► ,�, © I!3 0 4:11 ® c� K) 0 cn ® 0 R R E R R a� C 3 mD V M. rre�al (Ci D Cf3 �R Cl) N Ln w 00 0 ^E � N) cn 90 —1 E 0 m cp r O' cl, a) a al . .p w w n n' c C �, c cry t tv n na w w w w w 3 mD V M. rre�al (Ci D Cf3 �R Cl) N Ln w 00 0 ^E � N) cn 90 —1 E 0 m cp CITY OF BALDWIN PARK BALDWIN P •A, R• K t E B 1 20041 STAPP &@�r� REPORTS OF OFFICERS TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Melecio Picazo, Interim Director of Community Development DATE: February 18, 2004 SUBJECT: Award of Contract for Professional Consulting Services to Develop a Building Fee Schedule for Plan Checking & Inspection Services 7T : ' *3134 This staff report requests that the City Council award a contract for professional consulting services to develop a building fee schedule that reflects the current and specific cost of providing plan checking and inspection services for new building construction projects. BACKGROUND: For the past several years, many California jurisdictions have been facing a controversy in building fees charged to developers for new construction projects. State law and the attorney general's opinion is clear that a governmental jurisdiction cannot charge more than the reasonable cost of providing the service. Special interest groups have begun combating local governments over what they deem are "excessive fees." The challengers of the fees have asserted that the traditional Uniform Building Code valuation rate tables used by building and safety divisions could not be statistically supported, therefore resulting in overcharges unrelated to their projects actual cost. DISCUSSION: In response to assisting local governments in protecting themselves from fee challenges in court, the MAXIMUS group has developed a new fee analysis model for building and safety divisions to use for new construction projects. The model is called Nexus. It creates a cost per square foot based upon the use of the building and time- weighted averages for time spent on activities such as plan checking and inspection, Miscellaneous fees are also calculated in this same process for alterations, repairs and additions. The Nexus meets the standard in the State Attorney General's opinion 92 -500, which states that full cost recovery is appropriate as long as there is a linkage between services provided and the fees charged. From 2000 to the present, MAXIMUS has developed the Nexus fee structure for the cities of Anaheim, San Jose, San Diego, Chico, Vallejo, Belmont, Oceanside and Malibu. Staff Report -Award of Contract for Building Fees Study Page 2 of 4 They are currently working with the counties of Orange, Napa and Butte, in addition to the cities of Henderson, Nevada and Missoula, Montana. More recently, MAXIMUS has added a revenue and staffing forecasting module, which estimates activity unit volumes for projected revenue and staffing needs. It is an important tool that staff could use to prepare for fiscal year budgets. Briefly, MAXIMUS will perform a work plan to accomplish a Nexus study for the City of Baldwin Park as follows: Task 'I-Project Initiation: Meet with the City Building Official, Community Development Director and Finance Director to finalize the projects' scope and to assure that all desired outcomes have been addressed; adjust the project scope accordingly. Task 2- Obtain Financial Data: Secure actual and budget financial information; volume information and cost or revenue data by product type. Task 3- Develop Service Tables: Use current ICBO structural and trade tables as categories and /or modify tables to city - specific current work environment for new construction activities. Task 4- Determine Productive Hourly Rate: Productive rates are calculated based on total costs divided by net available hours, where total costs include direct and indirect costs; net hours include provisions for holidays, vacations, sick time, administrative duties, common time and travel time. Re- inspections are also tabulated for complex projects and /or owner- builder projects that require significant amounts of time. Task 6- Develop Tunes -to- Complete Schedules: For each type of occupancy category, determine the average time required to perform plan check and /or inspection services. Task 6- Develop Fee Schedules: The productive hourly rates are multiplied by service times to produce new fee tables. Task 7- Compare Results: In this task MAXIMUS will compare the total hourly rate of various services to other Nexus studies completed for other jurisdictions. Fees will be compared to the City's old UBC Valuation data tables and the new Nexus system. Task 8- Develop Capacity & Resource Tables: Analyze the data available, multiply productive hours by current or forecast hours to determine total hours; compare to existing hours and construct a variance analysis. This would help in budgeting additional staff needs for high volume of construction activity or the converse in staff reduction for a declining construction activity. Task 9- Finalize Tables: Verify City staff agreement on all information provided. Staff Report-Award of Contract for Building Fees Study Page 3of4 Task 10- Develop a Draft Report and Present Tables: Prepare a management report presenting the study findings and new proposed fee schedules. Task 11- Formal Presentation- Revisions if Needed: Present the study findings to the City Council and community; revise data /schedules as necessary to incorporate changes as approved by City staff. Task 12- Project Close Out: Incorporate final fee schedule and adopt by resolution of the City Council; answer and resolve any remaining questions. SUMMARY: Model published building codes are no longer providing permit and plan check fee information as they have in the past half century due to the current trend in fee association with services provided by the Building Division. The most effective way to calculate fees is by the Nexus system. The National Association of Horne Builders, the California Building Industry Association and the Building Industry Association of Southern California has found the Nexus fees method to be fair and impartial as an indirect revenue generating tool. MAXIMUS will additionally support the City if in the future any permit fees are challenged in court. Staff also met with Revenue & Cost Specialists (RCS) of Fullerton, California to evaluate their comparitable analysis called the Municipal Business System. RCS's method calculates full business cost revenue only. RCS's proposal cost was for substantially less ($7,000) but the product is different than that proposed by MAXIMUS. RCS utilizes a revenue comparison over a time average of nine years plus the current year with budgeted costs, salaries and benefits compared to actual expenditure costs. RCS- insists that comparing the revenue average to expected budgeted cost indicates the relationship of revenue to cost. However, in May of 2003, the Paladin Fair Housing Coalition, Inc. challenged the City of Corona in the Superior Court of California, County of Riverside in Case # RIC 359371 for excessive fees charged by the Building Department for- new construction costs. The City of Corona used RCS's method as previously described. The court found that the system (RCS'S) of averaging costs and revenues did not meet the statutory criteria requirement of determining fees and the cost to perform the service. The court called RCS's method "imprecise" and furthermore found that it did not meet the requirements of Government Code Sections 66014 or 66016 nor the State Attorney General's opinion 92 -506. FISCAL IMPACT: During the past 2003 -2004 Fiscal Year budgeting sessions, the costs for the award of the consulting contract with MAXIMUS was incorporated and approved in the amount of $16,000 with a maximum of $1,500 in expenses. Staff Report -Award of Contract for Building Fees Study Page 4 of 4 There will be no other fees impacting the general fund for this fiscal year unless the City Council wishes to include the Planning Division for a comprehensive study. The additional fee total to include the Planning Division study is $9,750. Building and Planning Divisions work directly together during the design review and plan check phase of new construction projects and it is highly recommended by MAXIMUS to perform the fee survey on both divisions together at one time. Although no monies were budgeted for Cost Center 45- Planning for the study, there are available funds in both Cost Center 41- Community Development Administration and Cost Center 46- Building & Safety to cover the additional fee of $9,500 plus $250 in additional expenses. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Award a contract for professional consulting services to perform a Building Fee Schedule for Plan Checking and Inspection Services with the MAXIMUS Group not to exceed the amount of $16,000 and a total of $1,500 in expenses; or 2. Direct staff to include the fee study costs for the Planning Division, proceed and execute the amended contract for a total of $25,500 plus $1,750 maximum expenses for the Building and Planning Fee Schedule Study with the MAXIMUS Group; and 3. Authorize the Mayor to execute an appropriate agreement. REPORT PREPARED BY: Mark R. Dozmati, C.C.E.O., C.B.O. Building Official Attachment: # 1 - Agreement to Provide Professional Consulting Services to The City of Baldwin Park & MAXIMUS # 2 - Letter Dated February 3, 2004 from MAXIMUS to the Finance Director relating to cost to include the Planning Division in the fee study. AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES TO THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this day of , 2004, and effective immediately by and between MAXIMUS (hereinafter called the "Consultant ") and the City of Baldwin Park (hereinafter called "City"), WITNESSETH THAT, WHEREAS, the City desires to develop fee schedules for one or more city divisions that reflects the current and specific cost of providing services for its customers, and WHEREAS, the Consultant is staffed with personnel knowledgeable and experienced in the requirements of developing such fee schedules, NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto mutually agree as follows: (1) Employment of Consultant. The City agrees to engage the Consultant and the Consultant hereby agrees to perform the following services. (2) Scone of Services. The Consultant shall do, perform, and carry out in a good and professional manner the following services: A. Develop a fee schedule for the building and safety division that is based on the division's current costs and conforms to existing legal guidelines; or B. Develop a fee schedule for the building and planning divisions that is based on both division's current costs and conforms to existing legal guidelines; C. Train City staff in using the schedule, and D . Install the computer model in the information systems network for the city's sole and exclusive internal use. (3) Time of Performance. The services to be performed hereunder by the Consultant shall be undertaken and completed in such sequence as to assure their expeditious completion and best carry out the purposes of the agreement. CoDipensation. A. The City agrees to pay the Consultant sixteen thousand dollars ($16,000) for all professional services listed in the Scope of Services Section 2A, plus a maximum of one thousand, five hundred dollars ($1,500) in travel and production expenses; or B. The City agrees to pay the Consultant twenty five thousand five hundred dollars ($25,500) for all professional services listed in the Scope of Services Section 2B including the planning division, plus a maximum of one thousand, seven hundred fifty dollars ($1,750) in travel and production expenses. In the event. Consultant is required to provide docwments or testimony in response. to. claims, demands or actions by third parties, Consultant shall bill the client for services rendered based on then current professional fees and expenses incurred. No tasks shall be undertaken without prior notification to the Client. This provision is intended to apply only to third party actions based on the Consultant's report and findings. (5) Method of Pam. The Consultant shall be entitled to payment in accordance with the provisions of this paragraph. The Consultant shall receive sixty percent (60 %) of the agreed upon fee upon submission of the draft fee schedules. The consultant shall receive another thirty percent (30 %) upon delivery of the final fee schedules and report. The final ten percent (10 %) of the fee shall be due upon completion of all services to the satisfaction of the City. (6) Change . The City may, from time to time, require changes in the scope of services of the Consultant to be performed hereunder. Such changes, which are mutually agreed upon by and between the City and the Consultant, shall be incorporated in written amendment to this agreement. (7) Services and Materials to be Furnished b the Cit . The City shall furnish the Consultant with all available necessary information, data, and material pertinent to the execution of this agreement. The City shall cooperate with the Consultant in carrying out the work herein and shall provide adequate staff for liaison with the Consultant and other agencies of City government. (8) Termination of Agreement for Cause. If, through any cause, the Consultant shall fail to fulfill in timely and proper manner his obligation under this agreement, the City shall thereupon have the right to terminate this agreement by giving written notice to the Consultant of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof, at least five (5) days before the effective date of such termination. (9) Information and Reports. The Consultant shall, at such time and inform as the City may require, furnish such periodic reports concerning the status of the project, such statements, certificates, approvals, and copies of proposed and executed plans and claims and other information relative to the project as may be requested by the City. The Consultant shall furnish the City, upon request, with copies of all documents and other materials prepared or developed in relation with or as part of the project. (10) Records and Inspections. The Consultant shall maintain full and accurate records with respect to all matters covered under this agreement. The City shall have free access at all proper times to such records, and the right to examine and audit the same and to make transcripts therefrom, and to inspect all program data, documents, proceedings, and activities. 2 01) Accomplishm ent of Protect.,. The Consultant shall corn nc„e, carry one and complete the project with all practicable dispatch, in a sound, economical, and efficient manner in accordance with the provisions thereof and all applicable laws. (12) _Matters to be Disregarded. The titles of the several sections, subsections, and paragraphs set forth in this contract are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall be disregarded in construing or interpreting any of the provisions of this contract. 13) Completeness of Contract. This contract and any additional or supplementary document or documents incorporated herein by specific reference contain all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties hereto, and no other agreements, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this contract or any part thereof shall have any validity or bind any of the parties hereto. (14) Cit y Not Obligated to Third Parties. The City shall not be obligated or liable hereunder to any party other than the Consultant. (15) When Rights and Remedies Not Waived. In no event shall the making by the City of any payment to the Consultant constitute or be construed as a waiver by the City of any breach of covenant, or any default which may then exist, on the part of the Consultant, and the making of any such payment by the City while any such breach or default shall exist in no way impairs or prejudices any right. or remedy available to the City in respect to such breach or default. (16) Personnel. The Consultant represents that he has, or will secure at his own expense, all personnel required in performing the services under this agreement. All of the services required hereunder will be performed by the Consultant or under his supervision, and all personnel engaged in the work shall be qualified to perform such services. (17) Consultant Liabili1y if Audited or subject of legal. action. The Consultant will assume all financial and statistical information provided to the Consultant by City employees or representatives is accurate and complete. (18) Indemnification - Each parry shall be responsible for its own acts and will be responsible for all damages, costs, fees and expenses which arise out of the performance of this agreement and which are due to that party's own negligence, tortious acts and other unlawful conduct and the negligent, tortious acts and other unlawful conduct of its respective agents, officers and employees. (18) Notices, Any notices, gills, invoices, or reports required sufficient if sent by the parties in the United States mail, noted below: 3 by this agreement shall be postage paid, to the address Mr. Jose Sanchez Director of Finance City of Baldwin Park 14403 East Pacific Ave. Baldwin Park, CA 91706 Dear Mr. Sanchez, February 3, 2004 This responds to your request for a quotation to expand the proposed building and safety fee analysis to include the planning division. We believe these additions will be valuable and cost effective in two ways. First, our experience has demonstrated that there is a linkage of service support between the two divisions. In order to capture the full cost of each operation, and recover that amount through user fees, both divisions must be thoroughly analyzed. In our scores of user fee studies over the past 20 years, governmental jurisdictions have overwhelmingly decided to recover virtually all costs associated with development related services. Therefore, I am confident that the additional fee for this cross - divisional analysis will be returned many times over. Second, I understand that the planning fees have not been analyzed from a full cost recovery basis for many years. Most likely, the general fund is (unintendedly) subsidizing the division's fee for service activities. By raising fees to full cost — for activities where an 'individual or business is making a profit based on that service — the city will have revenue to employ elsewhere, i.e. public safety, leisure activities, community benefit programs, etc. Again, the increased revenue will more than pay for the additional fee analysis. The professional services fee for the planning addition is $9,500. There would also be an increase of $250 in the maximum expenses to a new level of $1,750 (charged as incurred, up to $1,750). This contract addition price assumes that we can undertake the combined project simultaneously. If the additional services were contracted for at a later date, the fee would be increased (the combined engagement offers a significant "economy of scale" for us). Very truly yours, Richard Pearl Sr. Vice President Western Region City of Baldwin Park. 14403 East Pacific Ave. Baldwin Park, CA 91706 Attn. Mark Dozmati, CCEO, CBO MAXIMUS 4320 Auburn Blvd., Suite 2000 Sacramento, CA 95841 Attn: Richard Pearl IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the Consultant have executed this agreement as of the date first written above. ATTEST: (Mayor) MAXIMUS, Inc. By: RICHARD L. PEARL Vice President 0 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FEB 1 B 2004 ITEM NG. BAt.DWIN CITY OF BALDWIN PARK STAFF REPORT P A,R•K TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Shafique Naiyer, Director of Public Works Y t DATE: February 18, 2004 SUBJECT: Installation of Stop Signs, Speed Bumps and Traffic Signals and Other Traffic Control Devices PURPOSE Make residents aware that there are good reasons, based on traffic regulation laws, why we cannot install traffic control devices every time we receive such requests. BACKGROUND Quite frequently, Public Works staff receives requests from the public and the City Council for installation of traffic control devices. Sometimes these requests are also received in the form of a petition signed by hundreds of citizens. Many times this happens after an accident, which has resulted in death or serious injury. This has been also brought up by residents at different times during City Council meetings. Over the last two year period, staff has prepared and submitted to the City Council several agenda reports on this subject. We have also explained to the Council why we cannot install those traffic control devices every time there is a request. Every request goes through a review process conducted by our traffic committee. For the process and the members of the Traffic Committee please see attached staff report dated October 16, 2002. DISCUSSION It is a constant struggle for staff to balance between the public's desire and the traffic regulation laws which set the standards for the installation of these traffic control devices. The law is based on extensive research and investigation which takes into consideration traffic volume per hour for 24 hours, posted speed limit, number of traffic accidents and physical conditions of the surroundings like hospitals, schools, etc. This is known as performing the warrant study. If the warrant study meets the guidelines set, then we go ahead and install the traffic control device. Traffic control devices are only safe if people obey the traffic laws. We cannot make any system fool proof against drivers who are drunk, negligent and speeding. Even a stop sign and traffic signals tc.nnot de ter ILI E.e l. That ' i v'.,.., any iwG.s we don't Mu sll 'to :r.ss►a !,' Lai f C contr.E y devices because an accident has happened. The City of Baldwin Park was using guidelines set by Caltrans to do warrant study for stop signs and traffic signals. During our investigation we learned that the City of Los Angeles has developed some new warrants to address traffic safety around schools and residential areas of the City. These are much more liberal and staff is using these guidelines whenever possible since City Council adopted Los Angeles City Guidelines for warrant study on May 16, 2001. The highlights of the difference between the City of Los Angeles stop sign warrants and Caltrans stop sign warrant are as follows: 1. Minimum Volume Warrant: The minimum volume warrant is changed from a minimum of eight (8) hours to six (6) hours. 2. Accident Warrant: The minimum accident warrant is changed from five (5) accidents in a 12 month period to three (3) accidents in a 12 -month period. 3. Intersection of Collector Streets: This is a new warrant which allows for the installation of all -way stop control at the intersection of two (2) designated collector streets. 4. Peak Hour Residential Warrant: This warrant allows for the installation of all -way stop control in a residential area where the two (2) hour peak traffic volume meets the minimum traffic volume requirements of the Residential Warrant Chart. 5. School Area All -Way Stop Signs: This warrant allows for the installation of all -way stop control adjacent to a school based on the traffic volume during the two (2) peak hours of the day. This warrant requires a total of 350 vehicles on all approaches and a minimum of 140 vehicles and pedestrians on the side street. 6. Yield Signs: This warrant allows for the installation of yield signs on the stem of a "T" intersection where the safe approach speed is less than 15 MPH and it is necessary to assign right -of-way, but where a stop is not necessary at all times. By adopting this policy more intersections qualified for stop signs. In the past, speed bumps were used to slow traffic down. But they have proven to be more dangerous than safe. In parking lots, or in an alley it might be ok to install speed bumps, but in most cases, traffic regulators are against installing them for the following reasons: • Speed bumps and speed humps reduce crucial response times for emergency vehicles. Most Police and Fire Departments are not in favor of them. • Produce increased noise levels. Tim �iF. �i... il:.. t .i _ __ : ____ J i. traveling . i Ile Ci y s viability goes up 1oi damages incurre uy �id`v�il�ig verliCies ar�C1 pe0�JI2. • Maintenance of speed bumps and speed humps is high and expensive. • There is an increase in localized air pollution by exhaust fumes and break dust. See attached material on Speed Bumps and Humps. Conclusion: Stop signs are used on local streets to slow the traffic down. Studies shows that too frequent stop signs can be dangerous. The traffic flow is very important on major streets. Putting stop signs on major streets is not recommended as they bring high volume traffic to a halt, causing extreme congestion, increasing pollution and wear and tear of the streets. Congestion can create traffic hazard conditions. As long as an intersection meets the warrant for a stop sign, staff has no problem installing one. Staff considers speed bumps and humps unsafe and dangerous and will not recommend using them. Still, staff has not ruled out the installation of stop signs or speed bumps in special cases, even if they do not meet warrant. But these cases should be very few and must give the appearance that the device will increase safety. The Traffic Committee and the Engineering staff uses their best judgment based on traffic laws related to installation of these traffic control devices. However, City Council has always the option to overrule staff's recommendation if it chooses to do so. There is extensive literature available in the Engineering Division that can be reviewed by anyone interested. We also invite the public to discuss with us any questions or concerns they have on this subject. 413 tt UI; 0 It is recommended that the City Council receive and file this report. REPORT PREPARED BY Shafique Naiyer, P.E. Director of Public Works Attachments: Staff report dated October 16, 2002 Speed Humps - No Road Access for Disabled Americans Vn BALDW IN P, A • R • K Ctrrr n F B.a1Ai,r 2nR:� TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Pt MPORF Honorable Mayor and City Council Shafique Naiyer, Director of Public Works October 16, 2002 Traffic Committee ,,A4 //4 6-/1,A19 6"`e l r STA .FF R��P0RT. This report is to inform the City Council as to how the approval /denial process currently functions for traffic related requests and the role of the Traffic Committee. = e7 Zell L7 We presented this report to the City Council on September 18 and October 2, 2002, Council Member Ricardo Pacheco requested to table the report and bring it back at the next meeting. He wanted to review it and discuss it with staff before making a decision. Because of his scheduling problems the meeting with staff did not take place yet. Staff is requesting to table this report and bring it back when his comments are incorporated into the report. This would also allow other Council Members more time for their input. The City Council requested that staff review the role of the Traffic Committee and how well it is serving the residents. The Traffic Committee was established by the City Council over twelve years ago. The function of the Traffic Committee is to process traffic related requests from residents, business owners, School District, and Council members using State and City adopted ordinances and guidelines. Common requests relate to traffic signals, stop signs, red curb, crosswalks, and other traffic control devices. Meetings are held at City Hall on the last Tuesday of each month in room 307. The committee is formed of a five - member panel of professional staff representatives from: 1. Police Department's Traffic Bureau — Law Enforcement 2. Personnel - Risk Management 3. Public Works - Street Maintenance 4. Public Works — Engineering (2) The following chart shows the order in which traffic requests are processed, REQUESTS PREPARE REPORT FOR THE TRAFFIC COMMITTEE DISCUSSION INVESTIGATION: 1 . Review accident reports 2, Do site visit(s) 3. Contact applicant for additional information ANALYZE AND COMPILE DATA 1 . Collect traffic data and print statistical report 2. Interpret report and field data 3. If needed obtain warrant study TRAFFIC COMMITTEE MEETING Approves, denies or requests further study ACTION 1. Direct staff to implement task if approved 2. Inform the applicant of the Traffic Committee's decision Most cities have traffic committees and they serve the citizens reasonably well. However, the committees have a tendency to become somewhat bureaucratic and time consuming to act on a request. Staff has to go through several steps before it submits its findings to the Traffic Committee for its approval. Because the Traffic Committee meets once a month, if one missed the deadline, he has to wait another whole month. We hear a lot of complaints from the citizens and even Council Members about the time it takes to find out whether the request is approved or denied. This delay causes frustration and anger to the applicants. In order to expedite the process, Council may authorize the Public Works Director to use his judgment to resolve minor issues without going through the entire process. Most Public Works Directors are graduate civil engineers with a professional engineering license and have years of experience in the field. They are capable of making decisions on minor traffic related issues. Staff recommendation is based on making the system more efficient. FISCAL IMPACT Most painting of curbs, stop bars, arrows, crosswalks, installation of traffic signs, and stop signs is done by Public Works staff. So there is no significant cost except for needed materials. If a traffic signal is requested and warranted, the cost could be from $80,000 to $ 120,000. In case a warrant study is required, the cost is $700 - $800. Most funds used for this purpose are Prop C or Landscape and Lighting Assessment District. There is no impact on the General Fund. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Allow the Traffic Committee continue in its present form and make decisions on major traffic related issues; and 2. Authorize the Director of Public Works to use his judgment in resolving minor traffic requests like painting curbs, crosswalks, striping, stop signs on safe route to school. David Lopez, Associate Engineer Speed Humps NOIN . . ........ ........ Speed bumps slow down emergency vehicles. The maximum optimum response time for victims of sudden cardiac arrest is 4 minutes, at which time you have a 50 -50 chance of survival. At 5 minutes, you have a 19% chance of survival. The average time for a fire to burn beyond its flashover point is 6 minutes. In a study submitted to the City of Boulder, Colorado, it was determined that speed bumps would allow the death of 85 victims for every 1 they saved. They then assumed "a wildly optimistic posture" that still indicated speed bumps would cause 10 lives to be lost for every I saved. In Gaithersburg, Maryland, a television station blamed speed bumps in the death of two boys in a fire. A study for Heavy fire fighting vehicles cannot safely regain cruising speed between the humps. Speed bumps increase air pollution and fuel_usaae, Research was carried out in Austria with 6 humps and a 40 -kph speed limit over a mile stretch of road. Nitrogen oxide emissions increased 10 times, carbon monoxide 3 times, and carbon dioxide 25 %. Fuel consumption rose 27 %. In Portland, Maine, speed bumps were installed along Stevens Avenue. Volatile organic compound emissions increased by 46 %. "lf you have a broken neck and need a fast smooth ambulance ride to the hospital, do you want to risk permanent paralysis or death from sudden slowing down for or bouncing over speed bumps? " — a Colorado Professional Engineer Austin, Texas, L_____ considered a 30 second delay in response time due to traffic calming devices. They estimated they would lose an additional 37 lives per year with patients of cardiac arrest. At best, only one pedestrian may be saved. Unbeknownst to an Orange County, Florida, woman, she was airlifted by helicopter to a hospital. The fire- rescue report stated that she had fallen. The official story says that her injuries precluded an ambulance. But some neighbors think that the paramedics didn't want to drive over the nine speed humps in her neighborhood with her in the back. Speed humps are usually installed in a series to be effective. A study by the Transport Research Laboratory of the Department of Transportation, United Kingdom, showed that "Schemes with a 75 metre hump spacing... showed increases in CO and HC of around 70 -80% and 70 -100% respectively, and an increase in CO2 of around 50 -60 %." From: "Road Access for Disabled Americans°', www Aigitalthreads.com/rada which can result from driving or riding over speed humps makes these `traffic calming devices' into virtual barricades." In the aviation community, some charitable bights with patients are given the identifier of "Compassion ". These are flights like Mercy Mission, Angel Flight, etc. The reason for the identifier is to assist controllers in avoiding turbulence, even though they are not the priority handling "Lifeguard" flights. In a sense, with speed burlaps, we are adding `turbulence' to those less fortunate than most of us. Speed bumps make snow" removal difficult, as snowplow operators would have to raise their plows at the humps. Speed bumps increase vehicle wear and tear. This applies not just to our personal vehicles, but also to emergency vehicles and Speed bumps harm the buses. Speed bumps have caused disabled and those with physical fire equipment compartment doors ailments. Cortney had a birth to open and dump stored defect that caused brittle bones. equipment unto the street, crack One day her school bus hit a speed frames, break a truck tank, shear bump. Her arm and off a front axle assembly, and bones in her spine :112 break body welds. A British were broken. bus company estimates that The speed bumps cause it an Commission additional 40,000 a year, on Disability at Berkeley wrote with broken springs, skirting, that "For some people with exhausts, and a collapsed disabilities, the pain and injury suspension. Sacramento, Calf ']1 t t b t What evidence do we have that vertical deflection devices have been tested and found safe for all persons with disability while traveling in a wide range of motor vehicles? Page 1 of 2 s arlua, wi no pu us rou es on streets than contain speed humps. Sal W -b—UM 0 ii¢6 k�CCS4 noise. The increased noise is due to additional braking, acceleration, and jarri^g trruck bed& This especially holds true for larger vehicles. Reportedly, although I'm still trying to confirm this with the city, -there was an individual in Fort Collins, Colorado, who strongly pushed for speed bumps in her neighborhood. One of them was put in front of her home. She then 'read= She died about 4 trtonths later as a result of the accident. Experimental devices placed on a street to protect children at local. schools in .Portland, Maine, resulted in an increase in accidents of 35 1/o. People don't realize we have 500 gallons of water inside those fire engines. With that weight, we can't take bumps very fast. We have to come to almost a complete stop. " — a Californian Firefighter (Some tankers have up to 2040 gallons.] successfully pushed to have the city spend thousands more to have that one moved because of the increased noise. Speed bumps increase a community's liability for accidents associated with them. California courts have held those installing speed bumps liable for personal injuries resulting from faulty designs. In one case, a bicyclist was awarded a $125,000 settlement against a parking lot owner for an injury incurred after striking a speed bump. Speed burros increase neighborhood friction and road rage. Calling a speed hump a "traffic canning device" is worse than a misnomer or oxymoron. Are people calmed when others throw obstacles in their way? Al. S eed bum s are retrogressive. Why install a technologically poor device that presents an additional obstruction and danger to community members? Does your community have hetter uses for limited financial resources? Why spend thousands of dollars on speed bumps, when items such as road surfaces, pools, sewers, and landscaping need to be maintained? Do you want speed bumps, or is the money better spent on other items? It punishes all for the transgressions of a Lew. 1s it right to burden an entire community rather than the particular offenders? Check into whether or not off -duty sheriffs or private security guards could patrol the neighborhood. Although also costly, more paths and crosswalks could be utilized. As s d b=pss are discriminating to the disabled, some consider the idea of vot mg on whether or not to inct'all them invalid for discussion:, equivalent to voting to segregate schools by race. BiGYelists_ and motorevelists are also nhvsically impacted. Can you imagine the impact of an unwary motorcyclist hitting a speed bump? Or if snow is covering the speed bump sign or road? imagine the lawsuit. Speed bumps can cause accidental air baa deployment. One company confirmed four incidents of air bag deployment involving one of its models after striking speed bumps. Of the approximately 42 children killed by air bags, a clear majority has been in low speed accidents less than 15 miles per hour. `its a FirefzghterlParamedic for 15 years 1 know how hard it is to provide adequate care in a moving vehicle. Speed bumps make it almost impossible to do this. The ambulance either has to stop or treatment has to be postponed until after them. " from Santee, California Local Requirements: Check your local requirements. Where I live, the County Commissioners require 65% of the affected residents to approve a speed hump proposal. They also require 65% to remove them. Be aware of your local engineering guidelines and the associated expenses. Inquire as to who must meet the cost of installation. The humps must be correctly designed, painted, and signed. Page 2 of 2 Speed bumps can injure emergency respqnse members. One firefighter was awarded permanent disability status due to a cervical spine compression injury. Yes, she was wearing a seat belt. Another firefighter, although returned to limited duty for ten months after a speed bump accident, was then awarded full disability due to head and neck injuries received. Web Sites: For a site with many links pertaining to speed bumps, visit: www. io_coirY—burnper /ada.htrn. A well- researched report fo'r Boulder, Colorado, is available at: 1- itip: / /ii iernbers.aol. com/raybowin an/risk97/eval.1.htm.L Randall Schlecht, Loveland, Colorado. For corrections or questions e-mail at bl11e1n1T10)inf02( ()Q.net. Permission to reproduce all or part of this brochure is granted. R Road Access for Disabled Americans road .Access or Disab "cd AiiTici�ica�11N Speed humps are barriers to access • Speed humps are barriers to access for some fragile, disabled and elderly people. They are experimental. • The Americans with Disabilities Act requires that newly constructed or altered roads be accessible. • Now that disabled people across the country are protesting the impact on access, why are federal, state and local governments continuing with speed hump experiments? Good question? Page I of I "RADA" is a site for disabled people and their advocates This site is an introduction to the issue for disabled people and their advocates. It is a grassroots effort developed by people with disabilities who have come together via the internet. None of the information is intended to be legal or medical advice -- we are simply sharing our experiences as disabled people who want to continue to live independently. Prompt response by fire and medical emergency crews is also critical to many disabled people, so we include information. on the slowdown to emergency services. Finally, for general information, we link to a few engineering sites. Ace ss to public rights -of -way Slowdown. to Emergency Response E.Agineer ng Information CO R -ada_l Pored, 1998 July 4, 1998 (Version 1.) httpalwww.digitalthreads.co /rada/ 2/1112003 IF EE Es 1 8 2uu CITY OF BALDWIN PARK MS ST "'PORT .� !1 BALDWIN P A R, K TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members FROM: Melecio Picazo, Interim Community Development Director DATE: February 18, 2004 SUBJECT: Adoption of a Resolution Consenting to a Joint Public Hearing on the Proposed Amendment 2004 to the Redevelopment Plan for the Central Business District Redevelopment Project Area and the Environmental Findings of the Negative Declaration Prepared in Connection Therewith PURPOSE: The purpose of this report is to obtain approval from the City Council to consent to a joint public hearing with the Baldwin Park Redevelopment Agency on the proposed Amendment 2004 to the Redevelopment Plan for the Central Business District Redevelopment Project Area (the "Amendment 2004 ") and the environmental findings of the Negative Declaration prepared in connection therewith. T_ -woZ16111►Igm On September 4, 2002, the Agency approved a Consultant Services Agreement with GRC Associates, Inc. ( "GRC ") for the purpose of reestablishing the Agency's eminent domain authority over non - residential properties as it pertains to the Central Business District Redevelopment Project Area ( "CBD "). With CRC's assistance, staff determined the Agency's eminent domain authority in the CBD expired in 1994. Staff has met with Agency Counsel and GRC to initiate the plan amendment and GRC has begun the process. At its conclusion and provided that there is adequate public support and the Agency Board and City Council approve the Amendment 2004, the Agency will have regained eminent domain authority over non - residential properties for another 12 years in accordance with California Redevelopment Law (the "CRL ") time limits. On October 1, 2003, the Agency authorized GRC to proceed with Amendment 2004 to include eminent domain authority over non - residential parcels only. Accordingly, since residential property will not be subject to eminent domain, it was determined that a Project Area Committee would not be needed to provide input into the plan amendment process. On February 4, 2004, the Agency approved Resolution No. 387 which authorized the transmittal of the Draft Amendment 2004 to the Redevelopment Plan for the Central Business District Redevelopment Project Area to the Planning Commission for its report and recommendation with regard to the conformity of Amendment 2004 to the City's General Plan and making it available to the public for review. Page 2 of 3 Central Business district Redevelopment Plan Amendment February 18, 2004 Amendment 2404 is scheduled for review by the Planning Commission at its February 25, 2004 meeting. A community meeting for the property owners, residents and businesses within the CBD is tentatively scheduled for March 23, 2004 at 7:00 pm at the Community Center to discuss Amendment 2004 and to answer any questions from the community. Invitations to the community meeting will be mailed to each property owner, resident and business within the CBD this month. DISCUSSION: The CRL requires the Agency and the City Council to each hold a public hearing on any amendment to a redevelopment plan prior to taking any action on the amendment. As an alternative to separate public hearings, Section 33458 of the CRL states that the Agency and the City Council, with the consent of both, may hold a joint public hearing on a proposed amendment. Staff recommends that a Joint Public Hearing for Amendment 2004 be scheduled for the City Council meeting to be held on April 7, 2004. In compliance with Section 33452 of the CRL, a notice of the public hearing must be published pursuant to Section 6063 of the Government Code prior to the date of the hearing in a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City, or, if there is none, in a newspaper selected by the Agency. Section 6063 of the Government Code requires that the notice be published once a week for three successive weeks prior to the hearing. The notice of Dearing for Amendment 2004 must include a) a legal description of the boundaries of the CBD by reference to the description recorded by the County Recorder when the Plan was originally approved and b) a general statement of the purpose of Amendment 2004. in addition, copies of the notice of public hearing published pursuant to Section 33452 of the CRL must be mailed by first -class mail to the last known property owner of each parcel of land within the boundaries of the CBD as shown on the last equalized assessment roll of the County of Los Angeles 30 days prior to the public hearing. Additionally, the Agency is required to make a good faith effort to mail copies of the notice to all residents and businesses within the CBD, by first -class mail and at least 30 days prior to the hearing. Finally, copies of the notice of public hearing must be mailed to the governing body of each of the taxing agencies that levies taxes upon any property in the CBD by certified mail with return receipt requested 30 days prior to the public hearing. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council waive further reading, read by title only and adopt Resolution No. 2044 -009 entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK CONSENTING TO A ,JOINT PUBLIC HEARING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AND THE BALDWIN PARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT 2004 TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS OF THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION PREPARED IN CONNECTION THEREWITH" Page 3 of 3 Central Business District Redevelopment Plan Amendment February 18, 2004 ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit "A" - City Council Resolution No. 2004 -009 EXHIBIT "All City Council Resolution No. 2004-009 RESOLUI T ION NO. 2004.009 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK CONSENTING TO A JOINT PUBLIC HEARING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AND THE BALDWIN PARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT 2004 TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS OF THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION PREPARED IN CONNECTION THEREWITH THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby find, determine, and declare as follows: 1) That the Baldwin Park Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency ") has initiated proceedings for the proposed amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for the Central Business District Redevelopment Project Area (referred to as "Amendment 2004 ") in compliance with the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code, sections 33000, et seq.) (the "Redevelopment Law "); and 2) That the Agency and the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park must bold a joint public hearing for the purpose of considering the proposed Amendment 2004 and the Negative Declaration; and 3) That Redevelopment Law Section 33452 requires that a notice of said public hearing be published in a newspaper of general circulation and be mailed to each property owner, resident, business and affected taxing agency. SECTION 2. The City Council hereby consents to a Joint Public Hearing with the Baldwin Park Redevelopment Agency on the proposed Amendment 2004 and the Environmental Findings of the Negative Declaration prepared in connection therewith at the following time and place: Date: April 7, 2004 Time: 7:00 p.m. Place: Baldwin Park City Hall, Council Chambers, 14403 East Pacific Avenue, Baldwin Park -es(,W 0r 2004 -009 Page 2 SECTIvR The. City Clerk In cooperation with the S ecretary of the Agency, is authorized and directed to give notice of such public hearing in the form and manner required by law. PASSED AND APPROVED this 18th day of February, 2004. MANUEL LOZANO MAYOR ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ) 1, KATHLEEN SESSMAN, Deputy City Cleric of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park at its regular meeting held on February 18, 2004, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBER: NOES: COUNCILMEMBER: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBER: KATHLEEN R. SESSMAN DEPUTY CITY CLERK CITY COUNCIL AGENUA R-54 FB 1 `004 iTV n G � jF .,-„R�Tj P' � 111/ . I D/1 CT T nao�- & Report of Officers BALDWIN P � A, R � K TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members FROM: Melecio Picazo, Interim Director of Community Developmen DATE: February 18, 2004 SUBJECT: Downtown Street Market PURPOSE: The purpose of this staff report is to seek direction from the City Council in relation to the Downtown Street Market. II �m:(ti;Z�11 i:I ■�I On April 4, 2001, the City Council approved a 3 -year contract agreement with 11th Hour Productions for the establishment and operation of a Street Market during 2001, 2002 and 2003 in order to promote the downtown business community. On February 4, 2004, the City Council directed staff to bring back the report on the Downtown Street Market for discussion and provide additional information relating to costs. Attached to this report is the February 4" staff report. DISCUSSION: At the February 4, 2004 City Council meeting, Councilmember Marlen Garcia asked if Patricia Taylor (vendor owner of Tropical Islands) had purchased the market from 11th Hour Productions. Patricia Taylor was contracted by 11th Hour Productions to assist with managing the events last year. She assisted in coordinating with new Hispanic vendors and introduced Ballet Folklorico entertainment to the market. In addition, she incorporated other recreation programs such as Hawaiian Dance, Gymnastics and a variety of Martial Arts. As a result, the market attendance during the last year increased. In terms of costs, per the contract agreement, 11th Hour Productions was paid $17,500 each year for the management of the Street Market. The Police Department enforced public safety during each Street Market event for all three years. The estimated in -kind cost absorbed by the Police Department for the officers each year was $8,500 or $25,500 for all 3 years. The Police Department has been absorbing the personnel costs associated with enforcing safety at the Street Market and cannot continue to do so without reimbursement from the market. Should the market continue in 2004, the Police Department would recommend that the proposal include an appropriation in an amount of $8,500 for Police City Council February 18, 2004 Page 2 of 3 services, paid for by the producer of the event. Also, the Public Works Department staff provided additional clean up and repairs to irrigation /turf damage as a result of the Street Market events. 11t' Hour Productions did provide cardboard trash receptacles at each event and removed remaining trash at the conclusion of each event as required by the City. There were a few occasions, especially during the well - attended summer months, that the producer did not clean the park after the event per Public Works Department's level of service. However, the producer improved in cleaning the park as required during the last year. The estimated in -kind cost to the Public Works Department averaged $5,500 per year or about $17,500 for all three years of the market. The total estimate of in -kind costs for all three years to the Police Department and the Public Works Department were about $43,000. The income received by the City comes from business license fees and 15% of the gross revenues, consisting of the total of the fees charged per week to each vendor for booth fees, 7% of total sales charged to farmers and fees charged to attraction rides. Below is a summary of average vendors (includes attraction rides, farmers, food booths and crafters), market duration, expenditures and income by year for the Street Market: Summary: Average Vendors Market Duration Total Expenditures Total Income Net Cost 2001 2002 2003 32 26 36 35 weeks 26 weeks 27 weeks $51,614 $31,285 $31,446 $ 4,605 3,246 $ 5"M $47,009 $28,039 $26,185 (In 2001, the costs incurred to start the market are included such as barricades purchase, additional power outlet installations and generator rentals, in addition to the contract amount of $17,500. Total expenditures in the summary above include the in -kind costs absorbed by other departments as detailed in this report. Total income amount includes 15% of the gross revenues and business license fees). Since the Street Market agreement has terminated (reference Attachment A), staff is seeking direction from the City Council if it desires to continue with a street market in 2004. The City Council, at its discretion, may wish to offer 11t" Hour Productions an option to renew the agreement. Staff has discussed this possibility with 11 to Hour Productions and they have stated that they would like the opportunity to renew the agreement for a three - year term and at the same amount of $17,500 per year. The producer also stated they would consider an agreement renewal for a single year. Should the City Council authorize to start a street market in 2004, the producer recommends a start date of April 27 th , which would provide about 60 days to obtain vendors, permits and insurance. City Council February 18, 2004 Page 3 of 3 The Baldwin Park Chamber of Commerce has recently expressed interest in an opportunity in organizing or managing the Street Market event. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council provide direction to staff on whether it wishes to continue or not continue with the Downtown Street Market. ATTACHMENT: Attachment "A" — Staff Report Dated February 4, 2004 Downtown Street Market ATTACHMENT "A" Staff Report Dated February 4, 2004 Downtown Street Market BALDWIN CITY OF BALDWIN PARK i' A R K FEB - 4 2004 ITEM NO. 5 ".t)____ STAFF REPORT Report of Officers TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members FROM: Melecio Picazo, Interim Director of Community Development DATE: February 4, 2004 SUBJECT: Downtown Street Market PURPOSE: The purpose of this staff report is to seek direction from the City Council in relation to the Downtown Street Market. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: On April 4, 2001, the City Council approved a 3 -year contract agreement with 11`" Hour Productions for the establishment and operation of a Street Market during 2001, 2002 and 2003, Per the contract agreement, the end of the term was in 2003 and the last year for the Street Market, unless the City renewed the agreement. Street Market in 2001 In 2001, during its first year, the Street Market grand opening was on Tuesday, April 24', on Cesar Chavez Drive. On July 17, 2001, as recommended by the City Council, the Street Market was relocated to the grass area near the Morgan Park marquee to improve visibility. For that year, we averaged about 32 vendors (including attraction rides, farmers, food booths and crafters). The Street Market was held every Tuesday night from April 24`x' until December 18', for a total of 35 weeks. In accordance with the contract agreement, 11 « Hour Productions was paid $17,500 for the management of the Street Market during its first year of operation. The total income received during the first year was $4,505 (including annual business license fees). The income received by the City is 15% of the gross revenues, consisting of the total of the fees charged per week to each vendor for booth fees, 7% of total sales charged to farmers and fees charged to attraction rides. Street Market in 2002 In 2002, the Street Market opening day was on Tuesday, April 23'. In that year, the Street Market averaged about 26 vendors (including attraction rides, farmers, food booths and crafters). The Street Market duration went for 26 weeks and held every Tuesday night from April 23`d until October 22nd. As directed by the City Council, an amendment was made to the agreement in terms of the Street Market duration to end prior to the City's parade that starts the last week in October. In accordance with the contract agreement for 2002, we City Council February 4, 2004 Page 2 of 3 paid 11" Hour Productions $17,500 for the management of the Street Market. The total income received during the second year was $3,246 (including annual business license fees). Street Market in 2003 During its last year in 2003, the Street Market opening was on Tuesday, April 22, 2003, For 2003, we averaged about 36 vendors (including attraction rides, farmers, food booths and crafters). The Street Market was held every Tuesday night from April 22nd until October 215Y for a total of 27 weeks. In accordance with the contract agreement, 11th Hour Productions was paid $17,500 for the management of the Street Market. The total income received during the year in accordance with the contract was $5,261 (including annual business license fees). The Police Department enforced public safety during each Street Market event for all three years. Below is a summary of the expenditures and income for the Street Market by year. Income amount includes 15% of the gross revenues and business license fees: Summary.: 2001 2002 2003 2L SO Total Expenditures $36,380 $17,500 $17,500 Total Income $ 4,605 $ 3,246 __$_5 261 Net Cost $31,775 $14,254 $12,239 (The expenditure estimates above do not include in -kind costs by other departments and indirect costs such as trash disposal service, lawn repair or electricity consumption. An estimate of in -kind costs by other departments such as Police Department and Public Works Department has been estimated at about $30,000 per year. In 2001, costs incurred to start the market included barricades purchase, additional power outlet installations and generator rentals, in addition to the $17,500 for the contract). Since the Street Market agreement has terminated (reference Attachment A), staff is seeking direction from the City Council if it desires to continue with a street market in 2004. The City Council, at its discretion, may wish to offer 11`h Hour Productions an option to renew the agreement. Staff has discussed this possibility with 11`h Hour Productions and they have stated that they would like the opportunity to renew the agreement for a three - year term and at the same amount of $17,500 per year. The producer also stated they would consider an agreement renewal for a single year. Staff had discussed with the Baldwin Park Chamber of Commerce about the possibility of the Chamber organizing and managing the Street Market event, however, the Chamber is not interested at this time. City Council February 4, 2004 Page 3 of 3 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council provide direction to staff on whether it wishes to continue or not continue with the Downtown Street Market. ATTACHMENT: Attachment "A" — Street Market Agreement ATTACHMENT "A" Street Market Agreement AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AND 11TH HOUR PRODUCTIONS FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT AND OPERATION OF A NON - CERTIFIED FARMERS' MARKET AND STREET FAIR THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 57-rRday of April, 2001, between the City of Baldwin Park (hereinafter the "City ") and 11th Hour Productions, a California Partnership (hereinafter "Contractor "). RECITALS WHEREAS, the City desires to conduct activities that support and promote the business community, especially in the Downtown Central Business District, and WHEREAS, in its efforts to assist existing businesses and to encourage new businesses, the City desires to have a Farmers` Market and Street Fair (hereinafter, the "Street Market ") operated and conducted within the City; and WHEREAS, Contractor represents that it is an experienced organization which is qualified to establish, organize, and maintain the successful operation of a Street Market, and desires to do so on behalf of the City, in a manner consistent with Contractor's Letter of Interest dated January 25, 2001. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions hereinafter set forth and for good and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: A. OPERATION OF STREET MARKET 1. The Street Market shall be conducted and located in the City on Cesar Chavez Drive, between the streets of Ramona Boulevard and Laurens Avenue, with the additional use of portions of Morgan Park, as needed and at the discretion of the City. 2. The Street Market will operate each and every Tuesday from 4:00 p.m. through 9:00 p.m., beginning on April 24, 2001 and up ,and until December 18, 2001. For the remainder of the term of this Agreement, the Street Market shall begin on the third (3rd) Tuesday of March and continue up and until the third (3rd) Tuesday of December at the same times and locations described above. 1 B. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY THE CONTRACTOR 1. Contractor agrees to provide to City all expertise, personnel and services necessary to organize, establish, promote, and operate a non - certified Street Market and Street Fair. Such services shall include the following: a. Obtain and maintain all licenses and permits required by the State of California, the County of Los Angeles, the City, and any other government agencies having jurisdiction with respect to the operation of the Street Market, and the professional services provided by the Contractor. b. Recruit, retain and maintain contact with quality sponsors, farmers, vendors, artisans and entertainers for the Street Market. c. Provide all advertising and marketing efforts related to the opening and continued operation of the Street Market. Such advertising and promotion shall include, at a minimum, the following: 1) Newsprint - approximately 1 x 4 column advertisement to run throughout the year (including Baldwin Park NOW, the Penny Saver, the Highlander and various other newsprint media) 2) Posters - approximately 45 posters to be strategically placed around the City and in neighboring cities 3) Flyers - strategically placed around the City and in neighboring cities 4) Banner - 3 ft. x 30 ft. banner to be displayed on Ramona Boulevard throughout the year, at the discretion of the City d. Establish money handling and record keeping mechanisms for the operation of the Street Market, per the approval of the City. This includes, but is not limited to, the following: 1) collecting all monies from farmers and vendors, and other revenue; 2) paying and disbursing all monies owed to the City, and other expenses; 3) maintaining all financial and other Street Market records in accordance with generally accepted applicable accounting principles and standards. e. Provide any and all management services related to the operation of 2 _ the Street Market. #. Receive, process, and respond to any and all concerns of a government agency, customer, vendor, or City staff member related to the operation of the Street Market. g. Promote the Street Market locally and regionally through various promotional activities, including, but not limited to, special events with the Baldwin Park Chamber of Commerce or other local community organizations. h. Provide advice and cooperation with any volunteer organization within the City or the local community that is willing to assist in the ongoing success of the Street Market. C. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY THE CITY 1. City agrees to provide two (2) trash bins for exclusive use of the Street Market. 2. Prior to start of the Street Market, the City shall install four (4) 50 amp (Spider Box) receptacle plugs in the area agreed to by the City and Contractor. 3. City to supply security, barricades and parking restriction signs as agreed to by both parties. 4. Restroom facilities at Morgan Park on Cesar Chavez Drive shall be available at all times for the event. D. EFFECTIVE DATE, TERM AND RENEWAL 1. This Agreement shall be effective on the same date it is approved by the City, and shall continue for term of three (3) years. 2. This Agreement will terminate without any further action by either party hereto at the conclusion of the term. 3. At least thirty (30) days prior to the end of the term of this Agreement, City may, at its own discretion, offer the Contractor an option to renew this Agreement for an additional three (3) year term. Contractor shall respond to City's renewal offer within thirty (30) days from receipt of the offer. Such offer shall be excusive to Contractor, and shall expire automatically if Contractor does not accept or respond to the City's offer. 3 E. COMPENSATION 1. Prior to the commencement of the Street Market each year during the term of this Agreement, City shall pay to Contractor the amount of seventeen thousand five hundred dollars ($17,500) as payment for Operation Management and Production expenses, and for the costs of advertising in the manner described above. a. For the 2001 Street Market, City shall pay the amount of twelve thousand five hundred dollars ($12,500) prior to April 24, 2001, and the remaining five thousand dollars ($5,000) shall be paid within ninety (90) days from the first date of the Street Market (i.e., 90 days from April 24, 2001). b. For any subsequent Street Market conducted under this Agreement, the initial payment of twelve thousand five hundred dollars ($12,500) shall be made thirty (30) days prior to the third Tuesday in March of that year; and the remaining five thousand dollars ($5,000) shall be paid within ninety (90) days after the third Tuesday in March. 2. Contractor shall be entitled to eighty -five percent (85 %) of the gross revenues from the Vendors and Food Booths for each night of the Street Market. These revenues shall consist of the total of those fees charged per week to each vendor for booth fees, 7% of total sales charged to farmers, and fees charged to attraction rides. a. Contractor shall remit the remaining fifteen percent (15 %) of the gross revenues to the City. b. City's share of the gross revenues (15 %) shall be forwarded by Contractor at regular intervals of no less than four (4) times a year, as determined by the City. 3. Contractor shall not be entitled to any other costs or fees in relation to this Agreement, unless approved in writing by the City. P. TERMINATION City and Contractor shall have the right to terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, for any reason, with thirty (30) days written notice. In the event neither City nor Contractor exercises the right to terminate as set forth herein, the Agreement shall automatically terminate at the end of the term. In the event of early termination by either party, City shall be entitled to a prorated portion of the fees paid to Contractor. 9 C. NO";- IIAr1II~ITY OF OFFICALS AND EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY No official or employee of the City shall be personally liable to Contractor in the event of any default or breach by City, or for any amount which may become due to Contractor. H. INSURANCE During the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall maintain in full force and effect a policy or policies of liability insurance (including products liability coverage) in amounts and with an insurance company or companies reasonably satisfactory to CITY'S risk manager. Each such policy shall be enforced naming CITY and their elected officials, officers, employees and agents as additional insured, shall be primary insurance and shall provide that such insurance shall not be materially altered or terminated except after thirty days' notice is provided to CITY. Certificates evidencing the existence of the insurance specified in this paragraph shall be filed with CITY'S risk manager prior to Contractor undertaking any of its activities provided for in this Agreement. I. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR The Contractor is and shall, at all times, remain as to the City a wholly independent Contractor. Neither the City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of the Contractor except as expressly set forth in this Agreement. The Contractor shall not at any time or in any fashion represent that Contractor is in any manner an officer, employee or agent of the City. No employee benefits shall be available to Contractor in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except as provided in this Agreement, City shall not pay salary, wages, or other compensation to Contractor for performance hereunder for City. Contractor is responsible for payment of any income or other taxes which may arise as a result of this Agreement. City shall not be liable for compensation to Contractor for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. J. INDEMNIFICATION Contractor agrees to and shall defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless, the City, its elected and appointed boards, officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, defense costs, civil, penalties, expenses, causes of action, and judgments at law or in equity, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its elected and appointed boards, officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injuries or deaths of persons, or damage to property arising out of Contractor's or any of its S subcontracts' negligent or wrongful acts, or omissions under the terms of this Agreement. This section does not apply to liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City. K. NOTICES All notices to be delivered pursuant to this Agreement shall be given by personal service or by depositing the written notice in the custody of the United States Postal Service or its lawful successor, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: . I To CITY: Dayle Keller, CEO City of Baldwin Park 14403 Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, CA 91706 To PRODUCTIONS: Robyn L. Renner / Martha Henderson 11th Hour Productions 1320 Baseline Road La Verne, CA 91750 L. OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. Governing Law This Agreement and all disputes arising hereunder or related hereto, shall be governed by, construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without giving effect to the California conflict of laws principles. Venue for any action brought in relation to this Agreement shall be in the County of Los Angeles, California. 2. Entire Agreement This Agreement embodies the entire agreement and understanding of the parties hereto in respect of the subject matter contained herein and supersedes any prior agreements and understandings, both written and oral, between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. 3. Amendments This Agreement may not be amended except in a writing signed by each of the parties hereto. 0 A (' nnfrl nFinn '}, Vol IJL1 L14UL1 E This Agreement was negotiated jointly by counsel for the parties and shall not be construed against any party as the drafter if there is any question as to the meaning of its terms. 5. Severability The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this Agreement shall not affect the validity or enforceability of any other provision of this Agreement. 6. Successors and Assigns This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their heirs, successors, assigns, subsidiaries, parent entities and affiliates. 7. Counterparts This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 8. Attorneys' Foes if either party initiates a legal action to enforce the terms of this Agreement, then the successful party shall be entitled to recover its attorneys' fees and court costs incurred to bring the action, in addition to any other damages awarded. IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date first hereinabove written. 11TH HOUR PRODUCTIONS 7 ;APPROVED AS TO FOR old Alvarez- is man City Attorney X11 Hour Produdions Yow Sera a! Frrs.��n o�.r 9 11thHour Productions "Your Special Event Is Our Finest Hour!" 1320 Baseline Road Telephone: (909) 392 -8688 La Verne, California 91750 Fax: (909) 392 -8699 To: City of Baldwin Park Mr. Rick Forintos Community Development Director (626) 337 -2965 Fax (626) 960 -4031 x. 253 Project: City of Baldwin Park Downtown Street Market Re: Management of Weekly Downtown Street Market January 25, 2001 Dear Rick, It's a pleasure to submit a Letter of Interest for the City of Baldwin Park Street/Farmer's Market. We have given this matter a lot of consideration and attention since our meeting at La Tazza Coffee Shop. We've had constant communications with Mel since our meeting and it has been delightful speaking with him also. We thank you for considering us for this position of management for the Street/Farmer's Market. In our own regards, we think that this market is a valuable commodity for vendors, patrons, producers and especially the City itself. We agree, we should do all that we can to see that it's established and grows to benefit all who participate. We are indeed interested in this position being offered. Our background is well- suited for this position and project. As you know, we are currently the contracted producer for the City of Covina for the Covina Downtown Street Market. This market under 11 `h Hour Productions management has been reestablished as one of the finest Street Markets in our valley. We have been active in special events for the past nine years. Our background specializes in producing special events, business shows, product launches and marketing events for a diverse range of clients. Our major projects were CountryFest, California Country Jam, Women in Sports and LA Laughs. These all had attendance of over 25,000 people. We strongly feel that my experience is ample for any communication between City Officials, Planning Dept., Redevelopment Dept., Health Dept., Merchant Associations and Community Organizations. Similarly, we have the experience of a vendor in the past. We can communicate with our sellers with a certain reliance between producer and vendor. Needless to say, this can be a valuable benefit to any market! Keeping in mind your budget, we understand that we need to keep expenses to a minimum. For that very reason we feel that 1 l `h Hour Productions can offer our services to you that will benefit this project. As we discussed with you there are different ways we can handle the production cost of this market. Our enthusiasm is elevated for working on this project. The following breakdown will manifest for both Expense and Income for the Street Market. The figures have been calculated for a thirty -five (35) week production period April 24th - December 18th, 2001 conducted at Morgan Park, located between Ramona Blvd. and Lauren Street on Cesar Chavez Blvd., each Tuesday night from 4:00 - 9:00pm. Insurance: (Provided By 11`x' Hour Productions) Expense: $1,500.00 Our operation will maintain insurance coverage for General Liability ($1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage) Product Liability ($1,000,000 per occurrence for claims against products on sale at the market) and Employer's Liability ($1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease). A maximum of two additionally insured endorsement holders are included. 'T'rash (Provided By 11 "' Hour Productions) Expense: $1.,250.00 No less than 10 Cardboard box trashcans lined with plastic hefty bags will be placed at sensible locations around the venue. Our production crew will set-up and teardown these trash -cans to help maintain a favorable budget. The City of Baldwin Park at its own expense will need to furnish 11 "' Hour Productions with a minimum of two dumpsites exclusively used for Market. Labor: (Provided By 11 "' Hour Productions) Expense: $8,000.00 We will have a team of three crewmembers on grounds for set -up, teardown and trash detail at all times during the market. Each crewmember will be supplied at the rate of $6.250 per hour. (Any additional crewmembers will be billed separately.) Toilets Expense: $3,6100.00 Two portable toilets that are stationed permanently at the venue site during the duration of the production and strategically placed at an approved site by 11`h Hour Productions is a total cost of $3,600. Each toilet will be serviced once a week. Any additional portable toilets heeded to comply with Health Department requirements will become an additional expense and billed separately to the City. However, if permanent facilities are available at Morgan Park close to market venue, we can utilize these at no additional cost to the City of Baldwin Park. Entertainment: (Provided By 11`h Hour Productions) Expense: $10,000.00 Many aspects can fall into the category of Entertainment. We will primarily be using the services of musical performances, and roaming clowns. This budget will allocate the expense of $250.00 each week for this category. Advertising: Expense: $10,000.00 The marketing plan for this production is distributed into four parts. The following is the expense breakdown for each component. Newsprint: $7,600.00 (Approx. "1 x 4 column" advertisement will run according to advertising needs throughout year in newspapers such as the San Gabriel Valley Tribune, Highlander, Pennysaver, Craftmaster News Magazine, School District News and the Baldwin Park Now. We will also post Street Market on the California Agriculture web -sites promoting this market as well as any other web -sites that offer such services. We strongly recommend that the City of Baldwin Park utilizes the use of one of it's billboards primarily for the Downtown Street Market, as well as with the Community Cable Channels.) Posters: $300.00 (Approx. 45 posters will be strategically placed around the city and other neighboring cities to promote the event. Flyers: $1,250.00 (Will be strategically placed around the City and other neighboring cities to promote the event. Banner: $850.00 (A aft. x 30ft. Banner to be permanently displayed on Ramona Blvd. throughout Market year.) Permits; (Provided By 11`' Hour Productions) Expense: $940.00 Any market can expect to have the following approximate expenses for permits: Health Department/Food $290.00 Agriculture/Farmers $425.00 Taxes $225.00 Please note: Any additional permits needed to comply with any requirements will become an additional expense and billed separately to the City. Electricity: (Provided By 11 "' Hour Productions) Expense: $3,000.00 Portable electrical equipment and Temporary Power Distribution Centers will be furnished by 11 th Hour Productions as follows: Six (6) Spider Boxes, Six (6) 50Ft. v mac 1 ' l TF : o�ncav fn the Cables and 35 12 gaugc extension coros (cost $ 5..00 per weck.j �� =s :... WU c w_ r J _ _ r _. City to install four (4) 50 amp (Spider Box) receptacle plugs. All electrical equipment required must be installed before operations begin. If electrical services are not implemented before starting date generators must be rented per market night at an additional cost to the City of Baldwin Park. Total cost to be determined at a later date. . Portable Hand - washing Facilities: Supplied by 11th Hour Productions (111' Hour Productions can furnish this item at an additional cost and billed separately.) Utensil Washing Sink/Liquid Dumping Site: Supplied by 11th Hour Productions (11`x' Hour Productions can furnish this item at an additional cost and billed separately.) Barricades: Storage: Security: Parking Restriction Signs: Supplied by City of Baldwin Park Supplied by 11th Hour Productions Supplied by City of Baldwin Park Supplied by City of Baldwin Park Operation Management (Production): Expense: $7,500.+ 85% Booth Commission Keeping in mind your budget, we understand that we need to keep expenses to a minimum. For that reason we have based our monthly pay at $750.00 per month plus the commission of 85% of the Vendor/Food Booths for each market night. Our operations will include soliciting sponsorship, book keeping, advertising, contracting entertainment, promotional campaigns, vendor recruiting, communication between City Officials, Planning Dept., Redevelopment Dept:, Health Dept., Merchant Associations, and Community Organizations. We will report to City Council Meeting on a regular schedule if requested. The solace that the City of Baldwin Park can have "Peace of Mind" is assured with our services! Licenses: Income for the City of Baldwin Park Based on the average cost of $52.00 for a city business license an additional $3,900.00 can be developed for the City of Baldwin Park based on 75 vendors participating in this street market. 1 l th Hour Productions reserves the right to allow vendors to initially participate in the street market for a maximum of three weeks prior to enforcing license fees. This will allow 11th Hour Productions to recruit new vendors participants more successfully. Supplies: (Provided By 10 Hour Productions) Expense: $1,800.00 Breakdown of expenses are as follows: Duck Tape: $250.00 (yellow tape for caution) Spot Lights: $200.00 Postage: $250.00 m BALDWIN CITY OF BALDWIN PARK 11. Klk TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kara Bouton, Assistant to the CEO DATE: February 18, 2004 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAR RT SUBJECT: Adoption of Resolutions 2004 -013 and 2004 -014 Supporting Propositions 57 and 58 PURPOSE: The purpose of this report is to adopt Resolution No. 2004 -013 a resolution in support of Proposition 57- The Economic Recovery Bond Act and Resolution No. 2004 -014 a resolution in support of Proposition 58 — The California Balanced Budget Act. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: At their meeting on February 3, 2004, the City Council stated that they would like the opportunity to consider taking action in support of Propositions 57 and 58, which will be put before the voters in the March 2"d election. Resolution No. 2004 -013 supports Proposition 57 — The Economic Recovery Bond Act, which will allow the state to issue a $15 billion bond to address the budget shortfall. Resolution No. 2004 -014 supports Proposition 58 — The California Balanced Budget Act, which will change the State Constitution so that a balanced budget must be passed each year. FISCAL IMPACT: The adoption of Resolutions 2004 -013 and 2004 -014 will not have a fiscal impact on the City of Baldwin Park. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt: 1. Resolution No. 2004 -013, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, DECLARING ITS SUPPORT OF PROPOSITION 57 — THE ECONOMIC RECOVERY BOND ACT; and 2. Resolution No. 2004 -014, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, DECLARING ITS SUPPORT OF PROPOSITION 58 — THE CALIFORNIA BALANCED BUDGET ACT. ,F ,,n, RESOLUTION NO. 2004 -013 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, DECLARING ITS SUPPORT OF PROPOSITION 57 — THE ECONOMIC RECOVERY BOND ACT WHEREAS, the state of California is facing a daunting financial crisis; and WHEREAS, there is a current $15 billion shortfall of revenues to fund the State's FY 2003 -04 budget; and WHEREAS, a part of this shortfall includes the funding of the backfill for the Vehicle License Fee cuts that are in fact cities' funds; and WHEREAS, Proposition 57 would allow the State to issue a $15 billion bond to help balance the budget; and WHEREAS, without this bond issue, the State may run out of funds by June 2004; ITTI WHEREAS, the quality of life and safety of all California's will be at risk without the assurance that California will have the funds to cover its expenses. NOW, therefore, be it resolved that the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby support the passage of Proposition 57 and urges our residents to vote in support of the proposition on March 2"d. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 18th day of Feburary, 2004, Mayor Manuel Lozano Resolution 2004- 0.1.3. Page 2 ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ss. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK I, Rosemary M. Ramirez, Chief Deputy City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park at regular meeting of the City Council held on February 18, 2003, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL. MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Rosemary M. Ramirez, CMC Chief Deputy City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2004 -014 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, DECLARING ITS SUPPORT OF PROPOSITION 58 -THE CALIFORNIA BALANCED BUDGET ACT WHEREAS, State of California Income began to drop in 2001; and WHEREAS, the State budget has fallen badly out of balance; and WHEREAS, large deficits have been carried over from year to year; and WHEREAS, Proposition 58 would change the State Constitution so that a balanced budget must be passed each year; and WHEREAS, Proposition 58 would also set up a special reserve account that is set up to reach $8 billion (5% of the General Fund); and WHEREAS, requiring a balanced budget each year could head off budget shortfalls in the future; and WHEREAS, the larder reserve could make state spending more stable from yearto year; and WHEREAS, balanced budgets and less borrowing would help the state's credit rating and lower interest costs. NOW, therefore, be it resolved that the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby support the passage of Proposition 58 and urges our residents to vote in support of the proposition on March 2nd PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 18th day of Feburary, 2004. Mayor Manuel Lozano Resolution 2004-014 Page 2 ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ss. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK 1, Rosemary M. Ramirez, Chief Deputy City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park at regular meeting of the City Council held on February 18, 2003, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL. MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL. MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL_ MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Rosemary M. Ramirez, CIVIC Chief Deputy City Clerk FEB 1 8 2004 1 A � BAI.DWI N ITPhh F-1- ; . R .: K CITY OF BALDWIN PARK STAFF REPCR _. TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kara Bouton, Assistant to the CEO DATE: February 18, 2004 SUBJECT: REQUEST TO PROVIDE GRANT FUNDING TO NEW BEGINNINGS ROYAL RANGERS PURPOSE: The purpose of this report is to provide the City Council with background on the New Beginnings Church Royal Rangers program to allow them to consider awarding a grant of $500. BACKGROUND: At their meeting of January 21, 2004, the City Council directed staff to develop a questionnaire to provide background on youth groups requesting funds from the City through the Youth Related Services grant program. That questionnaire is attached. DISCUSSION: Staff contacted Mr. John Urize at New Beginnings Church to determine the purpose of the Royal Rangers program. The following information was received. 1. Royal Rangers is a Christian based organization similar to the Boy Scouts. Royal Rangers programs include Christian teachings. 2. Participants are young men ages 5 to 18. 3. The program will have its first meeting March 10h at New Beginnings Church. 4. The funds requested are to help start -up the organization 5. The total funding request is $500. Mr. Urize has said that he will fax the flyer for the organization to staff and that will be forwarded to the Council when it is received. FISCAL IMPACT: There are funds available in the Youth Related Services program to make this grant. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council review the information provided about the Royal Rangers program and determine whether to approve a grant in an amount not to exceed $500. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK YOUTH RELATED PROGRAMS GRANT QUESTIONAIRE 1. Please describe the organization for which you are requesting funds. Please include the following information: a. Purpose of organization b. Age of participants c. Meeting place and time 2. For what purpose are you requesting funds? a. Event/Competition — please include location, date and number of children participating. b. General Operating — please explain why funds are needed. 3. Please provide flyers or other public information pieces promoting your organization and the specific event for which you are requesting funds. 4. For what amount are you requesting funding? 611 Y (;UUII II AbLNUA FEB 1 V - -V ITEM NO, lw-45�_ CITY OF BALDWIN PARK STAFF REPORT BALDWIN _ -__. TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Dayle Keller, Chief Executive Office DATE: February 18, 2004 SUBJECT: Employee Classifications and Compensation PURPOSE The purpose of this report is to provide a report prepared by the Director of Public Works in December 2003, pursuant to a Council request. ffel wo Ti711�h7 At the February 4, 2004 meeting, Councilmember Ricardo Pacheco requested that a report related to a salary survey and recommendation for Public Works staff, previously prepared by the Public Works Director, be placed on the February 18, 2004 agenda. DISCUSSION Attached is the report requested by Councilmember Pacheco together with a memorandum responding to the report prepared by the Chief Executive Officer on January 27, 2004. That memorandum has been sent to the City Council, the Executive Team, and the City Attorney. Pursuant to Councilmember Pacheco's request, both of these reports are being placed on the Council agenda at this time. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council receive and file this report. y. CONFIDENTIAL. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK MEMORANDUM BALDWIN P - A•R•K TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Dayle Keller, Chief Executive Offic Ar- DATE: January 27, 2004 SUBJECT: Employee Classifications and Compensation When I returned from vacation on December 8, 2003, Shafique Naiyer, Director of Public Works, forwarded a staff report to me for inclusion on the December 17, 2003 agenda. The report was in response to an inquiry from Councilmember Pacheco at the December 3 Council meeting for information regarding salaries, duties, and responsibilities of Public Works staff. According to the report, Councilmember Garcia had also expressed concern at the same Council meeting regarding staff being properly compensated. I am attaching this report for your information because I know Shafique feels strongly about his staff and the great job they are doing. However, I indicated to Shafique that I could not put the report as presented on the Council agenda. I felt to do so would jeopardize the relationship of trust we currently have with all of our employees, regarding matters of classification and compensation, because we would be focusing on one department only while benefiting employees in several employee groups. I agree that some of our classifications are not being compensated appropriately. Attached is a salary survey done in July 2003 by the Personnel Division. During the meet and confer process this last year, several employee groups requested such a survey, and copies of it have been sent to all of the employee groups. It should be noted that this survey is preliminary at this time for the following reasons: 1. In July, 2003, most of the cities surveyed had already implemented their annual cost of living adjustment. Baldwin Park had not, and a 3% across the board adjustment for all non- Police Department employees has now taken place. 2. The monthly cafeteria benefit for all city employees was increased by approximately $200 per month. The July salary survey does not look at the cafeteria plan, which is the equivalent of salary for employees. In some cases, the increase in the cafeteria plan is higher than a comparable salary increase in that if it is used to pay for health benefits it is on a pre -tax basis. 3. A closer look needs to be done for many classifications to make sure that they are comparable with those surveyed in other cities. In several cases, differences need to be accounted for. For example, the Engineering Manager position on page 3 shoves a lower salary of approximately 20% for Baldwin Park, You will note, however, that four of the other cities classifications require a certificate of registration as a professional Civil Engineer. The incumbent for the City of Baldwin Park does not have that certificate. This is an example only. There are probably five to ten additional positions where the city needs to take a very close look at the duties and responsibilities to see how they line up with positions in other cities. One of those positions is definitely the Public Works Supervisor position (page 8). You will note the attached survey indicates Baldwin Park Public Works Supervisors make 8% to 10% more than the average of the survey cities. In Shafique's survey, they make 31 % to 34% less. The difference is in the type of responsibilities compared with. In Shafique's survey they were compared with. superintendent positions for the most part. These are people who have responsibilities for a major area of public works operations. Typically, there is just one superintendent in a given area. In Baldwin Park, we do not have a superintendent position, but rather three separate supervisor positions. These people work more like superintendents, but in a more narrow operational field. This situation was addressed in the Personnel Concepts report as being something that needs to be looked at. I want to emphasize that I am aware of the importance of appropriately compensating our employees, as well as making sure we have the right classifications to do the job. We must address these issues city -wide, and I would propose we do so with this next budget process, along with the next met and confer process. I would recommend the following: 1. The attached survey done by the Personnel Division be updated to take into account the City of Baldwin Park's most recent salary increases as well as the increase in the monthly cafeteria plan. The update will include Police Department classifications as well. 2. We engage an outside classification expert to assist us in looking at some of our city positions. This could be done in conjunction with the department heads to the extent they are requesting reclassifications for their employees. 3. The results of both the updated salary survey as well as the classification studies can be shared with the individual employee groups. 4. The revised classifications and/or compensation levels can be included in the proposed budget to be presented to the City Council in mid -May, 2004. I am requesting Personnel staff to proceed immediately to update the salary survey and to identify the positions that need to be looked at from a classification standpoint. I will personally work with them as well as the department heads to bring an appropriate classification /compensation proposal to the City Council in conjunction with the 2004 -05 Pa proposed budget. In the meantime, if you have any questions or would like to discuss . any of these issues, please don't hesitate to give me a call. C. E -Team Stephanie Scher, City Attorney 3 Dace 1. Chief of Police LOW NIGH Alhambra 7 step same $9,272.00 $11,539.00 Arcadia 10 -step Police Chief $9,265.00 $11,570,00 Azusa same $8,078.53 $9,819.51 Covina Police Chief $7,201.00 $8,753.00 Downey did not respond to survey Glendora same $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Montebello same $8,071.00 $9,815.00 Monterey Park Police Chief $9,082.00 $11,619.00 Pico Rivera Contracted to Sheriffs Whittier same $9,537.00 $11,271.00 Average without Baldwin Park $8,813.32 $10,548.31 Baldwin Park $9,583.00 $9,583.00 Baldwin Park % overlunder average 8.03% - 10.07% City Manager LOW HIGH Alhambra same $13,750.00 $13,750.00 Arcadia same $13,000.00 $13,000.00 Azusa same $9,957.08 $10,624.81 Covina same $10,226.00 $10,226.00 Downey did not respond to curve Glendora same $11,440.00. $11,440.00 Montebello C ity Administrator $10,306.16 $10,306.16 Monterey Park same $12,436.00 $12,436.00 Pico Rivera same $11,530.00 $11,530.00 Whittier same $12,944.00 $12,944.00 Average without Baldwin Park $11,73214 $11,806.33 Baldwin Park $10,890.00 $10,890.00 Baldwin Park % overlunder average I -7.73%1__ - 8.41% *Revised 1016103 Finance Director LOW HIGH Alhambra -7 step Director of Finance $8,561 .00 $10,027.00 Arcadia N/A -Admin Sery Director Azusa Director of Finance $7,095.54 $8,653.60 Covina same $6,851.00 $8,327.00 Downey did not res and to survey Glendora Finance DirlTreasurer $8,766.00 $8,766,00 Montebello NIA-Admin Sery Director Monterey Park same $7,813.00 $9,995.00 Pico Rivera Dir.Financial Management $7,806.00 $9,492.00 Whittier City Controller $7,805.00 $9,544.00 Average without Baldwin Park $7,813.93 $5,257.80 Baldwin Park $9,450.OQ $9,450.00 Baldwin Park % overlunder average 47 .31% 2.03% Page Director of Community Development LOW HIGH Alhambra -7 step Dev. Services Director $7,624.00 $10,005.00 Arcadia -10 step NIA Azusa same $7,545.13 $9,200.07 Covina Community Dev. Director $6,650.00 $8,083.00 Downey did not respond to survey Glendora Director of Economic Development $8,509.00 $8,509.00 Montebello same $7,219.00 $8,778.00 Monterey Park -10 step same $7,490.00 $9,582.00 Pico Rivera same $7,806.00 $9,492.00 Whittier -6 step same $7,669.00 $9,379.00 Average without Baldwin Park $7,564.02 $9,128.51 Baldwin Park $8,300.00 $8,300.00 Baldwin Park % overlunder average 8.87% - 9.98% Director of Housing LOW HIGH Alhambra NIA Arcadia N/A Azusa NIA Covina N/A Downey did not respond to survey Glendora N/A Montebello N/A Monterey Park N/A Pico Rivera Director of Housing Services $7,806.00 $9,492.00 Whittier NIA Average without Baldwin Park $7,806.00 $9,492.00 Baldwin Park $7,150.00 $7,150.00 Baldwin Park % overlunder average -9.17% - 32.76% Director of Recreation & Community Services LOW HIGH Alhambra Director of Community Serv. $7,400.00 $9,715.00 Arcadia Rec. & Comm. Services Dir. $7,604.00 $9,497.00 Azusa Director of Recreation & Fam. $6,727.53 $8,17735 Covina Parks & Recreation Dir. $6,650.00 $8,083.00 Downey did not respond to survey Glendora Community Services Dir. $7,000.77 $8,509.48 Montebello Director of Parks & Rec. $5,966.00 $7,254.00 Monterey Park Director of Recreation & Parks $7,295.00 $9,332.00 Pico Rivera same $7,806.00 $9,492.00 Whittier Director of Community Serv. $7,049.00 $8,613.00 Average without Baldwin Park $7,055.37 $8,741.43 Baldwin Park $7,936.00 $7,936.00 Baldwin Park % overlunder average 11.10% - 10.15% page-,, Chief Deputy City Clerk LOW HIGH $7,604.00 $9,497.00 LOW HIGH Alhambra Assistant City Clerk $4,073.00 $5,305.00 Arcadia Deputy City Clerk $3,328.00 $4,155.00 Azusa Assistant City Clerk $3,263.09 $3,966.27 Covina Deputy Council Clerk $2,716.00 $3,301.00 Downey did not respond to survey Glendora NIA Montebello N/A Monterey Park Deputy City Clerk $3,650.00 $4,670.00 Pico Rivera Deputy Ci Clerk $3,643.00 $4,430.00 Whittier Assistant City Clark $4,946.00 $6,080.00 Average without Baldwin Park $3,659.87 $4,558.18 Baldwin Park $3,831-00 $4,656.00 Baldwin Park % overfunder average 4.47% 2.10% Engineering Manager LOW HIGH $7,604.00 $9,497.00 LOW HIGH Alhambra -7 step NIA Arcadia -10 step Eng Sery Admin/City Engineer $7,419.00 $9,265.00 Azusa City Engineer * $5,913.69 $7,217.04 Covina City Engineer * $4,885.00 $5,938.00 Downey did not respond to survey Glendora NIA Montebello NIA Monterey Park -10 step NIA Pico Rivera City Engineer * $6,541.00 $7,954.00 Whittier -6 step NIA Average without Baldwin Park $6,189.67 $7,593.51 Baldwin Park $5,189.00 $6,308.00 Baldwin Park % over/under average - 19.28% - 20.38% *Requires Certificate of Registration as a Professional Civil Engineer Personnel /Risk Manager Alhambra -7 step NIA Arcadia -10 step H.R. & Risk Manager Azusa HR Manager Covina Risk Manager Downey did not respond to survey Glendora NIA Montebello Risk Manager Monterey Park -10 step Risk Manager Pico Rivera NIA Whittier -6 step NIA Average without Baldwin Park Baldwin Park LOW HIGH $7,604.00 $9,497.00 $3,876.19 $4,711.54 $4,249.00 $5,165.00 $4,473.00 $5,440.00 $4,957.00 $6,342.00 $5,031.84 $6,309.00 $6,231.11 $7,669.00 Baldwin Park % over/under average 20.24% 18.750/c Pa .a 4 Assistant to the CEO Alhambra -7 step Arcadia -10 step Azusa Covina Downey Glendora Montebello Monterey Park -10 step Pico Rivera Whittier -6 step LOW HIGH Assistant to the City Manager $5,710.00 $7,434.00 Special Ass. to the City Manager $5,516.00 $6,889.00 NIA Assistant to the City Manager $5,290.00 $6,430.00 did not respond to curve NIA Assistant to the City Administrator $4,473.00 $5,440.00 NIA Assistant to the City Manager $7,137.00 $8,680.00 Assistant to the City Manager $5,447.00 $6,713,00 Average without Baldwin Park $5,595.50 $6,931.00 Baldwin Park $4,800.00 $5,834.00 Baldwin Park % overlunder average - 16.57% - 18.80% Page 5 Deputy City Clerk LOW HIGH Alhambra -7 step same $3,033.00 $3,949.00 NIA Arcadia -10 step N/A Azusa NIA Covina did not respond to survey Downey N/A-has fft City Clerk Glendora NIA Montebello NIA Monterey Park -10 step NIA Pico Rivera NIA Whittier -6 step Average without Baldwin Park $3,033.00 $3,949.00 Baldwin Park $2,999.00 $3,646.00 Baldwin Park % over /under average -1.13% -8.31% Personnel Assistant LOW HIGH Alhambra -7 step same $3,245.00 $4,225.00 Arcadia -10 step NIA Azusa NIA Covina NIA Downey did not respond to survey Glendora Personnel Adm. Assistant $3,004.00 $3,651.34 Montebello NIA Monterey Park -10 step HR Assistant $3,466.00 $4,435.00 Pico Rivera same $2,912.00 $3,540.00 Whittier -6 step H.R. Assistant $3,014.00 $3,893.00 Average without Baldwin Park $3,128.20 $3,948.87 Baldwin Park $2,999.00 $3,646.00 Baldwin Park % overlunder average -4.31% -8.31% Executive Secretary to CEO LOW HIGH Alhambra - 7 step Secretary to the City Manager 3,474.00 4,524.00 Arcadia - 10 step Executive Assist to the City Mgr 3,67100 4,586.00 Azusa Executive Assist to the City Mgr 3,453.25 4,160.60 Covina Secretary to the City Manager 3,249.00 3,949.00 Downey did not respond to survey Glendora Executive Assist to the City Mgr 3,330.43 4,048.19 Montebello NIA Monterey Park - 10 step Secretary to the City Manager 3,466.00 4,435.00 Pico Rivera NIA Whittier - 6 step Secretary to the City Manager 3,395.00 4,461.00 Average without Baldwin Park 3,434.38 4,309.11 Baldwin Park 3,306.00 4,019.00 Baldwin Park % overlunder average -3.88% -7.22% Page 6 Executive Secretary LOW HIGH Alhambra -7 step Secretary $2,945.00 $3,833.00 Executive Assistant $3,673.00 $4,586.00 Arcadia -10 step Administrative Secretary $3,142.37 $3,782.72 Azusa Sr. Administrative Technician $2,941.00 $3,575.00 Covina did not res and to survey Downey Executive Assistant $3,330.43 $4,048.19 Glendora Administrative Secretary $2,513.00 $3,207.00 Montebello Monterey Park -10 step Administrative Secretary $2,956.00 $3,782.00 same $3,258.00 $3,962.00 Pico Rivera Whittier -6 step Administrative Secretary $2,448.00 $3,360.00 Average without Baldwin Park $3,022.98 $3,792.88 Baldwin Park $2,999.00 $3,646.00 Baldwin Park % overlunder average -0.80% -4.03% Personnel Analyst I LOW HIGH Alhambra -7 step Personnel Analyst 4,263.00 5,548.00 Arcadia -10 step HR Analyst 4,527.00 5,654.00 Azusa HR /Risk Mgmt. Analyst 3,906.50 4,711.54 Covina NIA Downey did not respond to survey Glendora NIA Montebello NIA Monterey Park -10 step HR Analyst 4,202.00 5,375.00 Pico Rivera NIA Whittier -6 step HR Analyst 3,991.00 5,227.00 Average without Baldwin Park 4,177.90 5,303.11 Baldwin Park 3,373.00 4,100.00 Baldwin Park % overlunder average - 23.86% - 29.34% Personnel Analyst 11 LOW HIGH Alhambra -7 step NIA Arcadia -10 step Sr. HR Analyst 4,997.00 6,241.00 Azusa NIA Covina NIA Downey did not respond to survey Glendora NIA Montebello Sr. Personnel Analyst 4,261.00 5,181.00 Monterey Park -10 step NIA Pico Rivera NIA Whittier -6 step NIA Average without Baldwin Park 4,629.00 5,711.00 Baldwin Park 4,031.00 4,900.00 Baldwin Park % over/under average I - 14.84% - 16.55% Pace 7 Alhambra -7 step Arcadia -10 step Azusa Covina Downey Glendora Montebello Monterey Park -10 step Pico Rivera Whittier -6 step Average without Baldwin Park Baldwin Park Baldwin Park % over/under average LOW HIGH NIA Accounting Supervisor Business Lic. Officer $3,247.00 $4,054.00 NIA LOW HIGH Alhambra -7 step NIA did not respond to survey Arcadia -10 step same $5,381.00 $6,721.00 Azusa NIA Covina same $4,64$.00 $5,650.00 Downey did not respond to survey Bus Lic Spec II $2,153.00 $2,751.47 $2,662.00 -3.36% Glendora -6 step same $4,575.04 $6,060.99 Montebello f=inance Services Su ervisor $3,336.00 $4,058.00 Monterey Park -10 step NIA Pico Rivera NIA Whittier -6 step N/A Average without Baldwin Park $4,485.01 $5,622.50 Baldwin Park $4,762.00 $5,788.00 Baldwin Park % overlunder average 5.82% 2.86% Senior Accountant LOW HIGH Alhambra -7 step NIA Arcadia -10 step NIA Azusa same $4,683.89 $5,656.47 Covina same $3,624.00 $4,405.00 Downey did not respond to survey Glendora NIA Montebello NIA Monterey Park -10 step same $4,666.00 $5,969.00 Pico Rivera NIA Whittier -6 step NIA Average without Baldwin Park $4,324.63 $5,343.49 Baldwin Park $4,319.00 $5,250.00 Baldwin Park % over/under average - 0.13% -1.78% Business License Processor Alhambra -7 step Arcadia -10 step Azusa Covina Downey Glendora Montebello Monterey Park -10 step Pico Rivera Whittier -6 step Average without Baldwin Park Baldwin Park Baldwin Park % over/under average LOW HIGH NIA Business Lic. Officer $3,247.00 $4,054.00 NIA NIA did not respond to survey Business Lie. Specialist $2,854.42 $3,469.74 NIA N/A NIA Bus Lic Spec II $2,153.00 $2,751.47 $2,662.00 -3.36% $2,956.00 $3,493.25 $3,235.00 - 7.98% Page 8 R ehabilitation Housing Specialist LOW HIGH Alhambra -7 step Rehabilitation Specialist $3,526.00 $4,591.00 Arcadia -10 step N/A Azusa N/A Covina N/A Downey did not respond to survey Glendora Housing Rehab Specialist $3,527.68 $4,287.90 Montebello N/A Monterey Park -10 step Rehab Specialist $3,870.00 $4,951.00 Pico Rivera NIA Whittier -6 step N/A Average without Baldwin Park $3,641.23 $4,609.97 Baldwin Park $3,451.00 $4,195.00 Baldwin Park % over /under average - 5.51% -9.89% Public Works Supervisor LOW HIGH Alhambra -7 step N/A Arcadia -10 step N/A Azusa Street Maintenance S vsr $4,058.18 $4,895.91 Covina same $3,624.00 $4,405.00 Downey did not respond to survey Glendora Street Supervisor $3,739.32 $4,545.22 Montebello Street/Bldg Maint Supervisors $3,336.00 $4,058.00 Monterey Park -10 step Public Wks Maint Supervisor $4,296.00 $5,496.00 Pico Rivera N/A Whittier -6 step Park Maintenance Supervisor $3,469.00 $4,765.00 Average without Baldwin Park $3,753.75 $4,694.19 Baldwin Park $4,194.00 $5,098.00 Baldwin Park % over /under average 10.50% 7.92% Accountant LOW HIGH Alhambra -7 step N/A Arcadia -10 step NIA Azusa same $3,796.64 $4,578.00 Covina same $3,281.00 $3,988.00 Downey did not respond to survey Glendora same $3,463.92 $4,210.42 Montebello same $3,390.00 $4,326.00 Monterey Park -10 step same $3,547.00 $4,538.00 Pico Rivera Accountant l $3,296.00 $4,007.00 Whittier -6 step N/A Average without Baldwin Park $3,462.43 $4,274.57 Baldwin Park $3,427.00 $4,16)6.00 Baldwin Park % over /under average -1.03% -2.61% Page n Housing inspector LOW HIGH Alhambra -7 step N/A Arcadia -10 step NIA Azusa NIA Covina NIA Downey did not respond to survey Glendora NIA Montebello NIA Monterey Park -10 step NIA Pico Rivera NIA Whittier -6 step NIA Average without Baldwin Park Baldwin Park $2,890.00 $3,513.00 Baldwin Park % over/under average Redevelopment Projects Coord LOW HIGH Alhambra -7 step NIA Arcadia -10 step NIA Azusa Economic Development Specialist $4,464.87 $5,39021 Covina NIA Downey did not respond to survey Glendora Redevelopment Coordinator $4,339.16 $5,274.31 Montebello NIA Monterey Park -10 step Housing and Community Dev. Coor. $4,473.00 $5,723.00 Pico Rivera NIA Whittier -6 step Cornmunity Development Coord. $3,486.00 $4,785.00 Average without Baldwin Park $4,190,76 $5,293.13 Baldwin Park $3,540,00 $4,303.00 Baldwin Park % overlunder average - 18.38% - 23.01% *Revised 9124103 Program Supervisor LOW HIGH Alhambra -7 step Recreation Su ervisor $3,221.00 $4,191.00 Arcadia -10 step Recreation Supervisor $4,101.00 $5,122.00 Azusa NIA Covina Recreation Service Supervisor $3,553.00 $4,319.00 Downey did not respond to survey Glendora Recreation Supervisor $3,743.53 $4,550.18 Montebello NIA Monterey Park -10 step NIA Pico Rivera Recreation Supervisor $3,749.00 $4,558.00 Whittier -6 step NIA Average without Baldwin Park $3,673.51 $4,548.04 Baldwin Park $3,541.00 $4,304.00 Baldwin Park % overlunder average -3.74% -5.67% P C A r tfe Code Enforcement Officer LOW HIGH Alhambra -7 step Arcadia -10 step Azusa Covina same $3,603.00 $4,692.00 Code Services Officer $3,247.00 $4,054.00 Community Improvement Off. $3,256.14 $3,919.32 same $3,029.00 $3,68100 did not respond to survey Downey Glendora Montebello Monterey Park -10 step Pico Rivera Cmnty Preservation Officer $3,150.83 $3,829 -90 same $2,992.00 $3,819.00 same $3,263.00 $4,175.00 Neighborhood lmpr.Officer $3,411.00 $4,147.00 Community Services Officer $2,585.00 $3,547.00 Whittier -6 step Average without Baldwin Park $3,170.77 $3,985.02 Baldwin Park $2,890.00 $3,513.00 Baldwin Park % overlunder average -9.72% - 13.44% Plan Check Engineer LOW HIGH Alhambra -7 step N/A Arcadia -10 step N/A Azusa N/A Covina Plan Checker $3,696.00 $4,493.00 Downey did not res and to surve Glendora NIA Montebello NIA Monterey Park -10 step Plan Checker $3,870.00 $4,951.00 Pico Rivera Plan Checker $4,260.00 $5,178.00 Whittier -6 step NIA Average without Baldwin Park $3,942.00 $4,874.00 Baldwin Park $4,060.00 $4,935.00 Baldwin Park % overlunder average 2.91% 1.24% Senior f=inance Clerk LOW HIGH Alhambra -7 step Sr. Account Clerk $2,926.00 $3,809.00 Arcadia -10 step Sr. Account Technician $3,168.00 $3,955.00 Azusa NIA Covina Sr. Financial Technician $2,941.00 $3,575.00 Downey did not respond to survey Glendora N/A Montebello NIA Monterey Park -10 step Sr. Account Clerk $2,941.00 $3,762.00 Pico Rivera Account Clerk I€ $2,698.00 $3,280.00 Whittier -6 step Sr. Accounting Technician $2,621.00 $3,599.00 Average without Baldwin Park Baldwin Park $2,882.50 $2,738.00 $3,663.33 $3,328.00 Baldwin Park % overlunder average - 5.28% -10.08% Page 11 Associate En .➢ eei LOW HIGH NIA Alhambra -7 step Associate Civil Engineer $5,062.00 $6,322.00 Arcadia -10 step Azusa Engineering Associate $5,205.92 $6,290.94 Covina Engineering Associate $4,511.00 $5,484.00 did not respond to survey Downey Civil Engineering Associate $4,924.41 $5,985.65 Glendora Associate Civil Engineer $4,261.00 $5,181.00 Montebello Civil Engineering Associate $4,666.00 $5,969.00 Monterey Park -10 step same $5,092.00 $6,190.00 Pico Rivera Whittier -6 step Civil Engineering Associate $3,992.00 $5,479.00 Average without Baldwin Park $4,714.29 $5,862.70 Baldwin Park $4,092.00 $4,794.00 Baldwin Park % over /under average - 15.21 % - 2229 %p Information Systems Support Tech LOW HIGH Alhambra -7 step NIA Arcadia Contracts out Azusa N/A Covina Personal Cm tr Sprt Tech $2,770.00 $3,367.00 Downey did not res and to surrey Glendora N/A Montebello Information Systems Tech $2,392.00 $3,055.00 Monterey Park -10 step N/A Pico Rivera NIA Whittier -6 step Information Services Tech $3,403.00 $4,671.00 Average without Baldwin Park $2,855.00 $3,697.67 Baldwin Park $2,741.00 $3,332.00 Baldwin Park % overlunder average -4.16% - 10.97% Program Coordinator LOW HIGH Alhambra -7 step same $2,711.00 $3,530.00 Arcadia -10 step N/A Azusa Recreation Coordinator $2,689.97 $3,269.67 Covina Recreation Serv.Coordinator $2,507.00 $3,047.00 Downey did not respond to survey Glendora NIA Montebello N/A Monterey Park -10 step same $3,094.00 $3,958.00 Pico Rivera same $2,754.00 $3,758.00 Whittier -6 step NIA Average without Baldwin Park $2,751.19 $3,512.53 Baldwin Park $2,805.00 $3,409.00 Baldwin Park % over /under average 9.92% -3.04 % Assistant Planner Alhambra -7 step Arcadia -10 step Azusa Covina Downey Glendora Montebello Monterey Park -10 step Pico Rivera Whittier -6 step Average without Baldwin Park Baldwin Park Baldwin Park % overlunder avera Engineering Technician Alhambra -7 step Arcadia -10 step Azusa Covina Downey Glendora Montebello Monterey Park -10 step Pico Rivera Whittier -6 step Average without Baldwin Park Baldwin Park Baldwin Park % overlunder avera Housing Programs Coordinator Alhambra -7 step Arcadia -10 step Azusa Covina Downey Glendora Montebello Monterey Park -10 step Pico Rivera Whittier -6 step Average without Baldwin Park Baldwin Park Baldwin Park % overlunder avera ;'aye "F2 LOW HIGH same $3,259.00 $4,245.00 same $3,765.00 $4,701.00 same $3,832.90 $4,622.07 same $3,448.00 $4,191.00 did not respond to survey same $3,527.00 $4,287.90 Planner $2,992.00 $3,819.00 same $3,650.00 $4,670.00 same $3,955.00 $4,807.00 Planner ll $3,455.00 $4,739.00 $3,542.66 $3,364.00 -5,31% 1106INTI HIGH NIA same $3,026.42 $3,641.79 same $2,534.00 $3,080.00 did not resoond to survey it Engineering Technician jineering Draft Technician iineerina Tech 11 NIA NIA NIA NIA did not respond to survey NIA NIA Housing and Com Dev Coord NIA Community Development Coord. 325.52 847.00 447.00 257.00 941.00 053.99 963.O0 -3.07% LOW ,473.00 ,486.00 ,979.50 ,600.00 - 10.54% 042.19 633 .00 410.00 959.00 038.00 829.14 601.00 -6.34% HIGH $5,723.00 $4,785.00 $5,254.00 $4,376.00 - 20.06% Pane 13 Lead Code Enforcement Officer LOW HIGH NIA Alhambra -7 step NIA Arcadia -10 step NIA Azusa NIA Covina did not respond to survey__ Downey NIA Glendora NIA Montebello NIA Monterey Park -10 step NIA Pico Rivera NIA Whittier -6 step Average without Baldwin Park Baldwin Park $3,513.00 $4,270.00 Baldwin Park % over/under average Information Systems Supervisor LOW HIGH Alhambra -7 step NIA Arcadia -10 step NIA Azusa NIA Covina NIA Downey did not respond to survey Glendora I.S. Technician Supervisor $4,764.87 $5,791.75 Montebello same $3,864.00 $4,698.00 Monterey Park -10 step NIA Pico Rivera N/A Whittier -6 step NIA Average without Baldwin Park $4,314.44 $5,244.88 Baldwin Park $4,502.00 $5,472.00 Baldwin Park % over /under average 4.17% 4.15% Building Inspector LOW HIGH Alhambra -7 step NIA Arcadia -10 step Combination Inspector $3,765.00 $4,701.00 Azusa same $4,175.96 $5,039.08 Covina General Building Inspector $3,380.00 $4,109.00 Downey did not respond to survey Glendora same $3,621.44 $4,401.93 Montebello Combination Building Inspector $2,992.00 $3,815.00 Monterey Park -10 step same $3,547.00 $4,538.00 Pico Rivera same $3,760.00 $4,570.00 Whittier -6 step Building Inspector l $2,911.00 $3,993.00 Average without Baldwin Park $3,519.05 $4,395.38 Baldwin Park $3,352.00 $4,074.00 Baldwin Park % over /under average -4.98% -7.91% Page 14 Assistant Engineer LOW HIGH N/A Alhambra -7 step Arcadia -10 step Azusa Covina same $4,586.00 $5,728.00 Engineering Assistant $3,690.00 $4,448.38 same $3,886.00 $4,724.00 did not respond to survey Downey Glendora Civil Engineering Assistant $3,852.62 $4,682,93 Engineering Assistant $3,563.00 $4,547.00 Montebello Civil Engineering Assistant $3,966.00 $5,074.00 Monterey Park -10 step Pico Rivera Whittier -6 step same $4,380.00 $5,324.00 Civil Engineering Assistant $3,610.00 $4,957.00 Average without Baldwin Park $3,94110 1 $4,935.66 Baldwin Park $3,720.00 $4,522.00 Baldwin Park % over /under average -5.9 &% -9.15% Public Works Inspector LOW HIGH Alhambra -7 step same $4,118.00 $5,355.00 Arcadia -10 step same $3,765.00 $4,701.00 Azusa Community Improvement Ins $3,256.14 $3,919.32 Covina Construction Inspector $3,624.00 $4,405.00 Downey did not respond to survey Glendora Construction Inspector $3,62144 $4,401.93 Montebello same $3,114.00 $3,974.00 Monterey Park -10 step same $3,547.00 $4,538.00 Pico Rivera same $3,853.00 $4,684.00 Whittier -6 step Public Works Inspector II $3,050.00 1 $4,185.00 Average without Baldwin Park $3,549.84 $4,462.58 Baldwin Park $3,345.00 $4,066.00 Baldwin Park % over /under average -6.12% - 9.75% Principal Planner LOW HIGH Alhambra -7 step same $4,984.00 $6,489.00 Arcadia -10 step Sr. Planner $4,586.00 $5,728.00 Azusa N/A Covina City Planner $4,984.00 $6,058.00 Downey did not respond to survey Glendora Sr. Planner $4,339.16 $5,274.31 Montebello City Planner $4,931.00 $5,996.00 Monterey Park -10 step N/A Pico Rivera Sr. Planner $5,128.00 $6,236.00 Whittier -6 step Isame $4,438.00 $6,094.00 Average without Baldwin Park $4,770.02 $5,982.19 Baldwin Park 1 $4,524.00 $5,499.00 Baldwin Park % overlunder average -5.44% - 8.79% Page 15 Planning Technician LOW HIGH Alhambra -7 step N/A Arcadia -10 step N/A Azusa same $3,026.42 $3,641.79 Covina same $2,825.00 $3,434.00:. Downey did not respond to survey Glendora Planning Aide $2,680.98 $3,258.75 Montebello N/A Monterey Park -10 step N/A Pico Rivera same $3,312.00 $4,026-00 Whittier -6 step Planner 1 $3,125.00 $4,288.00 Average without Baldwin Park $2,993.88 $3,729.71 Baldwin Park $2,915.00 $3,543.00 Baldwin Park % overlunder average '2.71% - 5.27% Building Official LOW HIGH Alhambra -7 step N/A Arcadia -10 step same: 51940.00 7,419.00 Azusa same 4,907.04 5,964.50 Covina NIA Downey did not respond to survey Glendora same 5,575.48 6,777.05 Montebello same 4,473.00 5,440.00 Monterey Park -10 step same 5,362.00 6,859.00 Pico Rivera N/A Whittler -6 step same 5,118.00 7,018.00 Average without Baldwin Park 5,229.25 6,579.59 Baldwin Park 4,710-001 5,726.00 Baldwin Park % over /under average - 11.02% - 14.91% Sr. Redevelopment Projects Coordinator LOW HIGH Alhambra -7 step N/A Arcadia -10 step N/A Azusa N/A Covina NIA Downey did not respond to survey Glendora NIA Montebello NIA Monterey Park -10 step NIA Pico Rivera NIA Whittier -6 step NIA Average without Baldwin Park 0.00 0.00 Baldwin Park 4,072.00 4,950.00 Baldwin Park % overlunder average 100.00% 100.00% Page 16 7, .1 - `O Sr. Equipment Mech LOW HIGH Alhambra -7 step NIA Arcadia -10 step Fleet Technician II $3,323.00 $4,149.00 Azusa N/A Covina same $3,091.00 $3,757.00 Downey did not respond to survey Glendora Lead Mechanic $3,700.17 1 $4,497.58 Montebello N/A Monterey Park -10 step N/A Pico Rivera E ui ment Mechanic II $3,040.00 $3,695.00 Whittier -6 step NIA Average without Baldwin Park Baldwin Park $3,288.54 $2,995.00 $4, 024.65 $3,640.00 Baldwin Park % over/under average - 9.80% - 10.57 %. Maintenance Worker I LOW HIGH Alhambra -7 step Parks Worker 1 $2,459.00 $3,200.00 Arcadia -10 step Maintenance Worker $2,796.00 $3,499.00 Azusa Facility & Street Maint Worker $2,705.04 $3,251.14 Covina Parks Worker $2,409.00 $2,928.00 Downey did not respond to survey Glendora Maintenance Worker $2,573.28 $3,127.84 Montebello Maintenance Worker $2,120.00 $2,704.00 Monterey Park -10 step Maintenance Worker $2,558.00 $3,272.00 Pico Rivera- this is 7 steps Maintenance Worker $2,406.00 $3,225.00 Whittier -6 step same $2,065.00 $2,836.00 Average without Baldwin Park $2,454.59 $3,115.00 Baldwin Park $2,294.00 $2,789.00 Baldwin Park % overlunder average - 7.00% Maintenance Worker 11 LOW HIGH Alhambra -7 step Parks Worker li $2,710.00 $3,525.00 Arcadia -10 step N/A Azusa Facility & Street Maint Wrk II $2,97017 $3,573.41 Covina N/A Downey did not respond to survey Glendora NIA Montebello NIA Monterey Park -10 step NIA Pico Rivera N/A Whittier -6 step same $2,282.00 Average without Baldwin Park $2,654.06 Baldwin Park $2,425.00 $3,128.00 $3,408.80 $3,068.00 Baldwin Park % overlunder average -9.45% -11.11% Page 17 Senior Maintenance Worker LOW HIGH Alhambra -7 step Parks Crew Chief $3,110.00 $4,052.00 N/A Arcadia -10 step Maint Worker 111 $3,293.93 $3,966.96 Azusa Parks Foreman $3,347.00 $4,068.00 Covina did not respond to survey Downey same $2,794.75 $3,397.24 Glendora N/A Montebello Maint. Leadworker $2,961.00 $3,788.00 Monterey Park -10 step Maintenance Crew Leader $3,064.00 $3,724.00 Pico Rivera same $2,387.00 $3,276.00 Whittier -6 step Average withou# Baldwin Park $2,993.95 $3,753.17 Baldwin Park $2,786.00 $3,386.00 Baldwin Park % over /under average -7.46% - 10.84% Equipment Mechanic LOW HIGH Aihambra-7 step Automotive Mechanic $3,221.00 $4,191.00 Arcadia -10 step Fleet Tech 1 $3,011.00 $3,759.00 Azusa same $3,562.70 $4,306.40 Covina same $2,798.00 $3,401.00 Downey did not respond to survey Glendora Mechanic $3,112.61 $3,783.30 Montebello same $2,948.00 $3,781.00 Monterey Park -10 step same $3,183.00 $4,073.00 Pico Rivera Equipment Mechanic 1 $2,727.00 $3,315.00 Whittier -6 step Equip. Sery Worker $2,227.00 $3,05100 Average without Baldwin Park $2,976.70 $3,740.30 Baldwin Park $2,722.00 $3,309.00 Baldwin Park % over /under average - 9.36% - 13.03% Street Sweeper Operator LOW HIGH Alhambra -7 step Street Maint Worker $2,710.00 $3,525.00 Arcadia -10 step Contracts out Azusa same $3,293.93 $3,966.96 Covina Contracts out Downey did not respond to survey Glendora, Motor Sweeper Operator $2,864.62 $3,482.18 Montebello Contracts out Monterey Park -10 step Contracts out Pico Rivera N/A Whittier -6 step Motor Sweeper Operator $2,522.00 $3,461.00 Average without Baldwin Park $2,847.64 $3,608.79 Baldwin Park $2,587.00 $3,144.00 Baldwin Park % over/under average - 10.07% . 14.78% Page 18 a � Administrative Clerk I LOW HIGH Alhambra -7 step Arcadia -10 step Azusa Covina Clerical Assistant 1 $2,340.00 $3,051.00 Office Assistant $2,415.00 $3,016.00 Office Specialist 1 $2,247.75 $2,695.32 Secrets $2,182.00 $2,652.00 did not respond to survey Downey Glendora Montebello Office Assistant $2,257.39 $2,743.88 Clerk typist $1,968.00 $2,512.00 N/A Monterey Park -10 step Pico Rivera Whittier -6 step same $2,286.00 $2,779.00 Secretary $2,282.00 $3,128.00 Average without Baldwin Park Baldwin Park $2,247.27 $1,836.00 $2,822.15 $2,231.00 Baldwin Park % overlunder average - 22.40% - 26.50% Administrative Clerk 11 LOW HIGH Alhambra -7 step Clerical Assistant 11 $2,462.00 $3,207.00 Arcadia -10 step N/A Azusa Office Specialist 11 $2,465.03 $2,959.42 Covina N/A Downey did not respond to survey Glendora Sr. Office Assistant $2,413.85 $2,94101 Montebello Secretary $2,279.00 $2,909.00 Monterey Park -10 step Sr. Clerk Typist $2,459.00 $3,145.00 Pico Rivera same $2,496.00 $3,034.00 Whittier -6 step___ N/A-part time position Average without Baldwin Park Baldwin Park $2,429.15 $2,026.00 $3,032.91 $2,463.00 Baldwin Park % overlunder average - 19.90% - 23.14% Finance Clerk LOW HIGH Alhambra -7 step Accounting Technician $3,259.00 $4,245.00 Arcadia -10 step Accounting Technician 1 $2,475.00 $3,091.00 Azusa Account Specialist 1 $2,630.53 $3,160.56 Covina Financial Technician $2,662.00 $3,236.00 Downey did not res and to survey Glendora Accounting Technician $2,590.42 $3,148.59 Montebello Account Clerk l $2,019.00 $2,575.00 Monterey Park -10 step Account Clerk $2,459.00 $3,145.00 Pico Rivera Account Clerk 1 $2,518.00 $3,061.00 Whittier -6 step Accounting Technician $2,378.00 $3,260.00 Average without Baldwin Park $2,554.55 $3,213.57 Baldwin Park $2,238.00 $2,720.00 Baldwin Park % overlunder average '14.14% - 18.15% Pace 19 Construction Clerk LOW HIGH N/A Alhambra -7 step NIA Arcadia -10 step N/A Azusa NIA Covina did not respond to survey Downey N/A Glendora N/A Montebello Monterey Park - 10 step Pico Rivera Building Clerk 2,560.00 3,275.00 Building Permit Technician 2,822.00 3,431.00 N/A 2,691.00 2,237.001 3,353.00 2,719.00 Whittier -6 step Average without Baldwin Park Baldwin Park Baldwin Park % overlunder average - 20.30% - 23.32% Housing Specialist LOW HIGH Alhambra -7 step Housing Aide $3,945.00 $3,833.00 Arcadia -10 step N/A Azusa N/A Covina N/A Downey did not respond to survey Glendora N/A Montebello N/A Monterey Park -10 step N/A Pico Rivera Housing Programs Spec. $3,326.00 $4,043.00 Whittier -6 step N/A Average without Baldwin Park $3,635.50 $3,938.00 Baldwin Park $2,237.00 $2,719.00 Baldwin Park % overlunder average - 62.52% - 44.83% Housing Specialist 11 LOW HIGH Alhambra N/A Arcadia N/A Azusa NIA Covina N/A Downey did not respond to survey Glendora N/A Montebello N/A Monterey Park N/A Pico Rivera NIA Whittier NIA Average without Baldwin Park Baldwin Park 2,466,001 2,997.00 Baldwin Park % overlunder average Imaging Specialist LOW ^age 20 HIGH Alhambra- Arcadia- Azusa Covina Downey Glendora Montebello Monterey Park- Pico Rivera Whittier- NIA NIA NIA NIA did not respond to survey NIA NIA NIA NIA N/A Average without Baldwin Park Baldwin Park $2,238.001 $2,720.00 Baldwin Park % over /under average V, Re CITY OF BALDWIN PARK STAFF REPORT B_ALDW_I_N P A , fi K TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Shafique Naiyer, Director of Public Works( DATE: December 17, 2003 SUBJECT: Review of Salary Survey and Recommendation BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION At the December 3, 2003, meeting of the City Council, Council Member Ricardo Pacheco instructed the Director of Public Works to bring back a report based on a salary survey representative of the actual duties and responsibilities of Public Works staff with recommendations. This was his second request. Council Member Marlen Garcia also mentioned that she would like to see staff properly compensated for work being performed at a higher level and in addition to their assigned position. It is my conclusion that there is concern within the City Council about whether our employees are being compensated fairly. I have managed the Public Works Department at the City of Baldwin Park for more than three years and have tried my best to hold the line on our staffing levels and costs. We have completed a great deal of Capital Improvement Projects each year and have made tremendous strides in mandated Environmental programs such as AB939 and NPDES. Last year our department budget was 50% of the entire City's budget yet due to the hard work of our staff we managed to keep personnel costs equal to that of previous years. Increases in personnel costs in Public Works have been the lowest of all other City departments. Simply stated, this Department has accomplished remarkable things unprecedented in any other City. More specifically as it relates to Engineering, when our yearly Capital Improvement budget last year increased from $4,5 million to $13.5 million, our staffing level in the Engineering Division remained the same. This resulted in substantial savings to the City. In addition, we also have expanded our service areas and levels for our Maintenance operations. Graffiti abatement expanded to from five (5) days to seven (7) days a week; Street Sweeping has increased from two times each month to weekly; we have added maintenance of the Teen Center and Skate Park, Shyre Park, upgraded Barnes and other Parks. We have also absorbed managing and monitoring programs like AB 939, NPDES, Industrial Waste and many recycling grant programs where other Cities add positions for each function, each of which expand yearly in mandates, technical detail and the potential for very expensive fines, all resulting in a need for highly trained and skilled staff to handle these programs. For sometime I have struggled with how to present this subject to the City Council. In one respect, the City's financial health has improved yet still needs to see improvement. In the other respect our staff is falling behind in wages each year. These staff members are loyal and very hard working members of a great team, but they realize that their compensation is well below industry standards. Each year they wait patiently without success for the City's financial picture to improve so that these inequities can be corrected. I must add that this has become a very frustrating issue that can only lead to a low sense of morale. Most of them have started looking elsewhere and will leave the City in the near future. It is an understatement to say that the loss of these valuable employees will be a great loss to the City. It will be very difficult, if not impossible to replace the caliber of employees that we take for granted. Only one in five employees can be classified as an outstanding employee and as the wage become farther below the standard it will get harder to attract these types of professionals. We have done a survey of neighboring cities whose financial health is similar to the City of Baldwin Park to accompany this report. The survey clearly shows how low the salaries are in the City of Baldwin Park. While this issue extends farther within the Department I am fully aware that it is not possible for the City to make the necessary adjustments to everyone so I have limited this to staff that are significantly below the average. In respect to the Maintenance operations, each of our Public Works Supervisors acts and performs duties of a much higher level. In fact, the company hired by the City to analyze the work of part of the Facility and Landscape Divisions clearly stated that the supervisors have a significant workload. The report stated, "This position works at a higher level than first line supervisors in other titles ". Furthermore, there are three staff members that currently carry additional workloads above and beyond the requirements and technical skills required of the position they hold. The Executive Secretary for Public Works, Associate Engineer and Public Works Supervisor each carries the workload that would normally be handled by two staff members in other cities. The expectations placed upon these individuals' gives a new meaning to the catch phrase of "double duty." If we cannot add additional staff we should compensate these individuals in some way for their work. Doing so will save the City money both in the short term and long term. Public Works handles more than five million dollars of capital improvement projects and five million dollars in maintenance programs. To accomplish this the Department is responsible for seventeen (t 7) cost centers and a staff of over 50 employees. This represents between 65 to 75% of all purchase orders and invoices for the entire City. Our Executive Secretary reviews financial monthly reports, supervises two administrative clerks, monitors the submittal of agenda reports and status reports, performs research requested by other departments for consultants working on behalf of the City, assists in budget preparation and monitoring. She is responsible for all correspondence of the Director, receives and responds to resolve hundreds of complaints monthly by the citizens. Our Engineering Associate performs the normal functions of the position, as well as, the added technical workload of complying with NPDES and Industrial Waste Discharge mandates upon the City while one Public Works Supervisor performs the routine duties of an increased capacity of Superintendent, as well as, highly skilled and technical work for AB939, general solid waste and recycling issued, franchised refuse hauling and State Department of Conservation and State Used Gil Recycling grants. Though most of our employees are paid well below industry standard I have selected only a few for raises or upgrade. These individuals are outstanding and very valuable employees and have served the City for many years. First, I recommend that the Engineering Manager and Associate Engineer salaries be raised 10 %. Second, I recommend that the position of Public Works Supervisor be upgraded to Public Works Superintendent with a 10% increase. Third, 1 recommend that the Public Works Executive Secretary be reclassified as Management Analyst with a 10% increase. FISCAL IMPACT There is no impact on the General Fund. For the FY 2003 -04 (Salary Plus Benefits) utilizing Gas Tax, Prop C and AB939: Engineering Manager (Gas Tax) Associate Engineer (Prop C): Public Works Superintendent Facilities (Gas Tax): Public Works Superintendent Street (AB 939): Public Works Superintendent Landscape (Prop C): Management Analyst (AB939): Total for FY 2003 -04: Total for FY 2004 -05: RECOMMENDATION $630.30 /month x 6 months x 1.26% _ $4,911.73 $479.40 /month x 6 months x 1.26% _ $3,873.74 $525.10 /month x 6 months x 1.26% _ $3,969.76 $525.10 /month x 6 months x 1.26% _ $3,969.76 $525.10 /month x 6 months x 1.26% _ $3,969.76 $375.50 /month x 6 months x 1.26% _ $2,838.78 Staff recommends that the City Council approve the following: $23,533.57 $47,067.06 1. 10% salary increase for the Engineering Manager and Associate Engineer positions effective January 1, 2004; 2. Upgrade Public Works Supervisor to Public Works Superintendent; 3. 10% salary increase for the Public Works Superintendent positions effective January 1, 2004; 4. Upgrade Executive Secretary -- Public Works to Management Analyst; and 5. 10% salary increase to Management Analyst position. REPORT PREPARED BY Shafique Naiyer, P. E, Public Works Director Attachments: Salary Survey for Engineering Manager and Associate Engineer Salary Survey for Public Works Supervisor O N Q N �' 0000 N CEO C cc cr -- C\ © N Lo lY AA p% 6G V! 60- 64 UY .� ta �05 C �0 ` OD Q (. (0 `V L O O LC3 64 CO c0 LO � u> va v). fF} 64 LO ER (1) L 11 � U L •� wr (� Q N O co O C N U cn fU •� cz D cm N c Q O (n : ctS .i O to c: fn O L _N (!� ° `� v � c c m U O Q, (a co 'D C y c UJ O -y- p 0 -0 7� CL C (D p O C CCtl 7 U) 'i-- U O x 0 LL L! U) Cn CL n Q U (D O� .� E c CO v m 0 co An 0 ell a E C- N 6 0 N cC > ti iLf Q � M � tLS CIS E 0 0- (D a, N tij c IU c U) o CL ro a c ° W a ¢ C6¢DL'3�� W iil. m O E 0 O C O O O d O co Fes-- crS U U yUUUUU Q V! UQCL o yj C N (D N C O U N U U a1 CU 4 O O M ca _� N N U} CB U¢ �¢ NQ O 0 a w a) r°n 0) UJ � ass n ¢ CD (3)i (D � U w 0U w u"I (D � c G m U .0 c a> C O ZM U3 Lti ltl c_ Ua U to U ° o, _a o vi cn m cn .� cn Q) J U m W Lu 0C) W ¢W LU0<UQU 0 t co CL CU cD W > O N cu Q a (Z W . c c o Cj t b m m C O O O U O O N ¢¢U5 LL W ° ai w q�w cn o m 0 0o o w O � ai o0 00o Ooo CU C) Ol C) 0 00< V1 UEL U UUUUCUODU¢ co UQ- C7ItT0 3 q O C) 0It0L7C>0000 O W 9 (q 0 p ]© [� po O O 0 CO C 17 C 4 .G t Cl) � m CJ � 73 N N C tt a) � m 00 ��� � I T �- �� ���� � °ac°'ao °aIq (Z) °arno Cl ggqqicv o ^, Lo rnNm00)r- N OI d' M00LOY C'3 O� 4N , �� �� o yj C N (D N C O U N U U a1 CU 4 O O M ca _� N N U} CB U¢ �¢ NQ O 0 a w a) r°n 0) UJ � ass n ¢ CD (3)i (D � U w 0U w u"I (D � c G m U .0 c a> C O ZM U3 Lti ltl c_ Ua U to U ° o, _a o vi cn m cn .� cn Q) J U m W Lu 0C) W ¢W LU0<UQU 0 t co CL CU cD W > O N cu Q a (Z W . c c o Cj t b m m C O O O U O O N ¢¢U5 LL W ° ai w q�w cn o m 0 0o o w O � ai o0 00o Ooo CU C) Ol C) 0 00< V1 UEL U UUUUCUODU¢ co UQ- iqll'- BA LDWIN rA. R: K CITY OF BALDWIN PARK TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kara Bouton, Assistant to the CEO ' DATE: February 18, 2004 B 1 8 2004 STAFF SUBJECT: Approval of Resolution No. 2004 -006 and Introduction for first reading of Ordinance No. 1223 Both Relating to Amending the City's Contract with CaIPERS to Include the 3% @ 50 Retirement Benefit for Sworn Personnel The purpose of this report is for the City Council to 1) approve Resolution No. 2004- 006, A Resolution of Intention to Approve An Amendment Between the Board of Administration California Public Employees' Retirement System and the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park and 2) introduce for first reading Ordinance No. 1223 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park Authorizing An Amendment to the Contract between the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park and Board of Administration of the California Public. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: In November 2001, the City Council approved three year Memoranda of Understanding with the Police Association and Police Management Association. As a part of these agreements, the City Council approved the 3% @ 50 PERS Retirement Benefit for all sworn personnel effective June 30, 2004. In order to implement this program on June 30th, it is necessary for the City to amend our contract with PERS. The contract amendment process begins with an actuarial, which was completed this fall and is followed by a Resolution stating the City's intent to amend our agreement and an Ordinance authorizing the amendment of the agreement. Attached to this report for the City Council's approval is Resolution No. 2004 -006 which states the City's intention to amend the agreement with PERS. Also attached for introduction for first reading by the City Council is the Ordinance authorizing the amendment to the agreement. The content of both documents was created by PERS. In accordance with PERS requirement, the Resolution will be immediately forwarded to PERS and the Ordinance will be brought back to the City Council for second reading, no less than twenty days following the City Council's approval of the resolution. FISCAL IMPACT: In accordance with PERS requirements, staff is reporting the following fiscal impacts associated with this contract amendment will be an 11.057% increase in our current retirement costs for sworn personnel. This is equivalent to an additional $536,677 in PERS payments in the next FY 2004 -05. It should be noted that staff anticipated this 11.057% increase and there are sufficient funds set aside in the homeland security reserve approved by the City Council with the FY 2003 -04 budget. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Read by title only and waive further reading of Resolution No. 2004 -006, A Resolution of Intention to Approve An Amendment Between the Board of Administration California Public Employees' Retirement System and the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park and; 2. Introduce for First Reading Ordinance No. 1223, An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park Authorizing An Amendment to the Contract between the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park and Board of Administration of the California Public. RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT BETWEEN THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES` RETIREMENT SYSTEM AND THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF BALDWIN PARK WHEREAS, the Public Employees' Retirement Law permits the participation of public agencies and their employees in the Public Employees' Retirement System by the execution of a contract, and sets forth the procedure by which said public agencies may elect to subject themselves and their employees to amendments to said Law; and WHEREAS, one of the steps in the procedures to amend this contract is the adoption by the governing body of the public agency of a resolution giving notice of its intention to approve an amendment to said contract, which resolution shall contain a summary of the change proposed in said contract; and WHEREAS, the following is a statement of the proposed change: To provide Section 21362.2 (3% @ 50 Full formula) for local police members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the governing body of the above agency does hereby give notice of intention to approve an amendment to the contract between said public agency and the Board of Administration of the Public Employees' Retirement System, a copy of said amendment being attached hereto, as an "Exhibit" and by this reference made a part hereof. Date adopted and approved (Amendment) CON -302 (Rev. 4 /96) Presiding Officer Title Af#,4,�a� caieetts California Public Employees' Retirement System Between the Board of Administration California Public Employees' Retirement System and the City Council City of Baldwin Park The Board of Administration, California Public Employees' Retirement System, hereinafter referred to as Board, and the governing body of the above public agency, hereinafter referred to as Public Agency, having entered into a contract effective September 1, 1965, and witnessed July 7, 1965, and as amended effective January 1, 1972, July 1, 1977, October 9, 1994, December 2, 1995, November 15, 1998 and December 3, 1999 which provides for participation of Public Agency in said System, Board and Public Agency hereby agree as follows: A. Paragraphs 1 through 12 are hereby stricken from said contract as executed effective December 3, 1999, and hereby replaced by the following paragraphs numbered 1 through 12 inclusive: 1. All words and terms used herein which are defined in the Public Employees' Retirement Law shall have the meaning as defined therein unless otherwise specifically provided. "Normal retirement age" shall mean age 55 for local miscellaneous members and age 50 for local safety members. 2. Public Agency shall participate in the Public Employees' Retirement System from and after September 1, 1965 making its employees as hereinafter provided, members of said System subject to all provisions of the Public Employees' Retirement Law except such as apply only on election of a contracting agency and are not provided for herein and to all amendments to said Law hereafter enacted except those, which by express provisions thereof, apply only on the election of a contracting agency. 3. Employees of Public Agency in the following classes shall become members of said Retirement System except such in each such class as are excluded by law or this agreement: a. Local Police Officers (herein referred to as local safety members); b. Employees other than local safety members (herein referred to as local miscellaneous members). 4. In addition to the classes of employees excluded from membership by said Retirement Law, the following classes of employees shall not become members of said Retirement System: a. FIRE FIGHTERS. 5. The percentage of final compensation to be provided for each year of credited prior and current service for local miscellaneous members shall be determined in accordance with Section 21354 of said Retirement Law, subject to the reduction provided therein for service prior to December 31, 1971, termination of Social Security, for members whose service has been included in Federal Social Security (2% at age 55 Full and Modified). 6. The percentage of final compensation to be provided for each year of credited prior and current service as a local safety member shall be determined in accordance with Section 21362.2 of said Retirement Law (3% at age 50 Full). 7. Public Agency elected and elects to be subject to the following optional provisions: a. Section 20042 (One -Year Final Compensation). b. Section 21571 (Basic Level of 1959 Survivor Benefits). C. Section 20903 (Two Years Additional Service Credit). d. Section 21024 (Military Service Credit as Public Service), Statutes of 1976. e. Section 20503 (To Remove the Exclusion of All Hourly Rated or Hourly Basis Employees, Prospectively from December 3, 1999), 8. Public Agency, in accordance with Government Code Section 20790, ceased to be an "employer" for purposes of Section 20834 effective on July 1, 1977. Accumulated contributions of Public Agency shall be fixed and determined as provided in Government Code Section 20834, and accumulated contributions thereafter shall be held by the Board as provided in Government Code Section 20834. °. Public Agency shall contribute to said Retirement System the contributions determined by actuarial valuations of prior and future service liability with respect to local miscellaneous members and local safety members of said Retirement System. 10. Public Agency shall also contribute to said Retirement System as follows: a. A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, payable in one installment within 60 days of date of contract to cover the costs of administering said System as it affects the employees of Public Agency, not including the costs of special valuations or of the periodic investigation and valuations required by law. b. A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, payable in one installment as the occasions arise, to cover the costs of special valuations on account of employees of Public Agency, and costs of the periodic investigation and valuations required by law. 11. Contributions required of Public Agency and its employees shall be subject to adjustment by Board on account of amendments to the Public Employees` Retirement Law, and on account of the experience under the Retirement System as determined by the periodic investigation and valuation required by said Retirement Law. 12. Contributions required of Public Agency and its employees shall be paid by Public Agency to the Retirement System within fifteen days after the end of the period to which said contributions refer or as may be prescribed by Board regulation. If more or less than the correct amount of contributions is paid for any period, proper adjustment shall be made in connection with subsequent remittances. Adjustments on account of errors in contributions required of any employee may be made by direct payments between the employee and the Board. B. This amendment shall be effective on the BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION " PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETI SYSTEM BY KENNETH W. MARZIO , CHIEF ACTUARIAL & EMI R SERVICES DIVISION PUBLIC EMPLOYE RETIREMENT SYSTEM AMENDMENT ER# 0595 PERS - COIN -702A (Rev. 8 \02) day of , CITY COUNCIL CITY OF BALDWIN PARK BY PRESIDING OFFICE" Witness Date Attest: Cry "' ORDINANCE NO. 1223 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AND THE BOARD OF ADMINSTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES` RETIREMENT SYSTEM NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park as follows: SECTON 1. That an amendment to the. contract between the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park and the Board of Administration, California Public Employees' Retirement System is hereby authorized, a copy of said amendment being attached hereto, marked Exhibit, and by such reference made a part hereof as though herein set out in full. SECTION 2. The Mayor is hereby authorized, empowered, and directed to execute said amendment for and on behalf of said Agency. SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall take effect 30 days after the date of its adoption, and prior to the expiration of 7 days from the passage thereof shall be published at least twice in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune, a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Baldwin Park and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall attest and certify the passage and adoption of this ordinance, which shall take full force and effect thirty (30) days after the date of its adoption. APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 18th day of February 2004. Ordinance 1223 ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA } COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES } ss. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK Page 2 MANUEL LOZANO Mayor 1, Rosemary M. Ramirez, Chief Deputy City Clerk, of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held February 18, 2004 and was adopted by the City Council at its regular meeting held on , by the following vote of the Council: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: ROSEMARY M. RAMIREZ, CIVIC Chief Deputy City Clerk Ca1PERS California Public Employees' Retirement System EXHIBIT AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT Between the Board of Administration California Public Employees' Retirement System and the City Council City of Baldwin Park The Board of Administration, California Public Employees' Retirement System, hereinafter referred to as Board, and the governing body of the above public agency, hereinafter referred to as Public Agency, having entered into a contract effective September 1, 1965, and witnessed July 7, 1965, and as amended effective January 1, 1972, July 1, 1977, October 9, 1994, December 2, 1995, November 15, 1998 and December 3, 1999 which provides for participation of Public Agency in said System, Board and Public Agency hereby agree as follows: A. Paragraphs 1 through 12 are hereby stricken from said contract as executed effective December 3, 1999, and hereby replaced by the following paragraphs numbered 1 through 12 inclusive: 1. All words and terms used herein which are defined in the Public Employees' Retirement Law shall have the meaning as defined therein unless otherwise specifically provided. "Normal retirement age" shall mean age 55 for local miscellaneous members and age 50 for local safety members. 2. Public Agency shall participate in the Public Employees' Retirement System from and after September 1, 1965 making its employees as hereinafter provided, members of said System subject to all provisions of the Public Employees' Retirement Law except such as apply only on election of a contracting agency and are not provided for herein and to all amendments to said Law hereafter enacted except those, which by express provisions thereof, apply only on the election of a contracting agency. 3. Employees of Public Agency in the following classes shall become members of said Retirement System except such in each such class as are excluded by law or this agreement: a. Local Police Officers (herein referred to as local safety members); b. Employees other than local safety members (herein referred to as local miscellaneous members). 4. In addition to the classes of employees excluded from membership by said Retirement Law, the following classes of employees shall not become members of said Retirement System: a. FIRE FIGHTERS. 5. The percentage of final compensation to be provided for each year of credited prior and current service for local miscellaneous members shall be determined in accordance with Section 21354 of said Retirement Law, subject to the reduction provided therein for service prior to December 31, 1971, termination of Social Security, for members whose service has been included in Federal Social Security (2% at age 55 Full and Modified). 6. The percentage of final compensation to be provided for each year of credited prior and current service as a local safety member shall be determined in accordance with Section 21362.2 of said Retirement Law (3% at age 50 Full). 7. Public Agency elected and elects to be subject to the following optional provisions: a. Section 20042 (One -Year Final Compensation). b. Section 21571 (Basic Level of 1959 Survivor Benefits). C. Section 20903 (Two Years Additional Service Credit). d. Section 21024 (Military Service Credit as Public Service), Statutes of 1976. e. Section 20503 (To Remove the Exclusion of All Hourly Rated or Hourly Basis Employees, Prospectively from December 3, 1999). 8. Public Agency, in accordance with Government Code Section 20790, ceased to be an "employer' for purposes of Section 20834 effective on July 1, 1977. Accumulated contributions of Public Agency shall be fixed and determined as provided in Government Code Section 20834, and accumulated contributions thereafter shall be held by the Board as provided in Government Code Section 20834. 9. Public Agency shall contribute to said Retirement System the contributions determined by actuarial valuations of prior and future service liability with respect to local miscellaneous members and local safety members of said Retirement System. 10. Public Agency shall also contribute to said Retirement System as follows: a. A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, payable in one installment within 60 days of date of contract to cover the costs of administering said System as it affects the employees of Public Agency, not including the costs of special valuations or of the periodic investigation and valuations required by law. b. A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, payable in one installment as the occasions arise, to cover the costs of special valuations on account of employees of Public Agency, and costs of the periodic investigation and valuations required by law. 11. Contributions required of Public Agency and its employees shall be subject to adjustment by Board on account of amendments to the Public Employees' Retirement Law, and on account of the experience under the Retirement System as determined by the periodic investigation and valuation required by said Retirement Law. 12. Contributions required of Public Agency and its employees shall be paid by Public Agency to the Retirement System within fifteen days after the end of the period to which said contributions refer or as may be prescribed by Board regulation. If more or less than the correct amount of contributions is paid for any period, proper adjustment shall be made in connection with subsequent remittances. Adjustments on account of errors in contributions required of any employee may be made by direct payments between the employee and the Board. B. This amendment shall be effective on the _ BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETI r �ANT SYSTEM � BY KENNETH W. MARZIO ..1,, CHIEF ACTUARIAL & EMPL 5� I=R SERVICES DIVISION PUBLIC EMPLOY RETIREMENT SYSTEM �V AMENDMENT ER# 0595 PERS- CON -702A (Rev. 8102) day of , CITY COUNCIL CITY OF BALDWIN PARK BY PRESIDING OFF ICE(al.1`-- Witness Date Attest: C OR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FEB 1 8 2004 r & NO. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK STAFF REPORT WDWI N P.A•R.K TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Dayle Keller, Chief Executive Officer DATE: February 18, 2004 SUBJECT: Proposed Urgency and Regular Ordinance Relating to Unclassified Service Employees PURPOSE The purpose of this report is to provide background and make a recommendation for the adoption of an urgency ordinance and a regular ordinance relating to unclassified service employees. BACKGROUND At its meeting on February 4, 2004 the City Council considered an ordinance and an urgency ordinance relating to unclassified service employees. A copy of that staff report is attached. During discussion at the February 4 meeting, the City Council requested that the manager positions intended to be made at -will to the City Manager (CEO) in the proposed ordinance should be made at -will to the City Council. Following that discussion, the Council requested that the ordinance and urgency ordinance be revised to reflect that request. In addition, the City Council requested that the current ordinance be amended to reflect the existing practice as contained in the employment agreements of the department heads. DISCUSSION There is currently a recruitment for the Personnel /Risk Manager position. That recruitment period closed on February 9, 2004, and there is a need to make an appointment at the earliest possible date. Therefore, to be able to fill that position with an at -will employee, an urgency ordinance is necessary. The employees currently filling management positions will not be affected by the proposed ordinance. The ordinance will be applicable only to management personnel hired after February 18, 2004. The proposed ordinance does not impact in any manner the bargaining position of the management unit; nor will it necessarily in the future as a result of new employees being hired at -will. During the discussion on February 4, I stated to the Council that I did not recommend the change to have manager positions at -will to the City Council. I wish to repeat in this written report that I do not recommend it in that I believe it will make the City's recruitment for these positions more difficult, as well as add confusion to management employees as to the "chain of command." While three of the five management classifications currently report to the Chief Executive Officer, two of them, the Engineering Manager and the Redevelopment Manager, report to the Director of Public Works and the Director of Community Development, respectively. If, after discussion, the Council believes it would be preferable to leave the manager positions at -will to the City Manager (CEO), then an alternate set of ordinances (Nos. 3 and 4) are provided in the recommendation. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact resulting from the proposed urgency ordinance or ordinance. It is anticipated that all salary ranges will remain as they are in the current salary resolution, and that any future changes will result from the same processes currently in existence, i.e., the meet and confer process, salary surveys, etc. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Waive further reading, read by title only and adopt an URGENCY Ordinance No,. 1225 entitled, "AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING SECTIONS 31.03 AND 33.05 OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE TO PLACE MANAGERS IN THE UNCLASSIFIED SERVICE AND TO CONFORM THE ORDINANCE RELATING TO DEPARTMENT HEAD EMPLOYMENT TO THE CURRENT PRACTICES," AND 2. Waive further reading, read by title only and introduce for first reading Ordinance No. 1226 entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING SECTIONS 31.03 AND 33.05 OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE TO PLACE MANAGERS IN THE UNCLASSIFIED SERVICE AND TO CONFORM THE ORDINANCE RELATING TO DEPARTMENT HEAD EMPLOYMENT TO THE CURRENT PRACTICES," OR, AS AN ALTERNATIVE: 3. Waive further reading, read by title only and adopt an URGENCY Ordinance No. 1225 entitled, "AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING SECTION 33.05 OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE TO PLACE MANAGERS IN THE UNCLASSIFIED 2 SERVICE AND TO CONFORM THE ORDINANCE RELATING TO ........................... DEPARTMENT HEAD EMPLOYMENT TO THE CURRENT PRACTICES," AND 4. Waive further reading, read by title only and introduce for first reading Ordinance No. 1226 entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING SECTION 33.05 OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE TO PLACE MANAGERS IN THE UNCLASSIFIED SERVICE AND TO CONFORM THE ORDINANCE RELATING TO DEPARTMENT HEAD EMPLOYMENT TO THE CURRENT PRACTICES," Attachments: 1. Proposed Ordinances 1225 and 1226 (two sets) 2. Chapter 31 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code 3. February 4, 2004 Staff Report (includes Chapter 33 of the BPMC) 3 ORDINANCE NO. 1225 AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING SECTIONS 31.03 AND 33.05 OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE TO PLACE MANAGERS IN THE UNCLASSIFIED SERVICE AND TO CONFORM THE ORDINANCE RELATING TO DEPARTMENT HEAD EMPLOYMENT TO THE CURRENT PRACTICES. WHEREAS, the Baldwin'Park Municipal Code currently provides that all employees of the City, unless otherwise specified, are included within the Classified Service of the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to make all future employees filling positions as managers at -will employees not subject to the Classified Service of the City; and WHEREAS, the City is currently in the process of recruiting for persons to fill a vacant manager position and wishes to hire such person as an at --will employee; and WHEREAS, the City Council further desires to conform the provisions of the Municipal Code relating to the hiring and termination of department heads to the actual practices as to such positions. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS; SECTION 1. A new subsection (W) is added to Section 31.03 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code to read as follows: (W) The CEO shall plan, direct, supervise, coordinate, and evaluate persons appointed to manager positions in the same manner as is established by this Section for department heads. The CEO may delegate these responsibilities as appropriate for administration of City operations. The positions of department head and manager are those described in paragraph (1) of Division (B) of Section 33.05 of this Code. SECTION 2. Section 33.05 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: § 33.05 UNCLASSIFIED SERVICE EMPLOYEES The persons now, or hereafter, holding any of the following positions shall be deemed to be included within the unclassified service of the city. Unclassified service employees shall not be subject to the provisions of this chapter with reference to the city's personnel system; nor shall the unclassified service employees be subject to, or governed by, the provisions of the city's personnel rules and regulations. Appointments to_ and dismissals from, pocitlone i the unclassified scv; ce shall be 1___ , a��. �..�u.... , vAa �AV A1A governed, exclusively, by the provisions of §§ 33.02 through 33.07. (A) City Council appointees. Persons holding any of the positions enumerated in this division shall be "at- will" employees, appointed by, and serve at the pleasure of, the City Council: (I) Any person employed by the city as an independent contractor for the purpose of performing a specific function or service. (2) The City Manager. (3) The City Attorney. (4) Department heads and manager positions. (B) (1) Department head and manager positions. The following positions constitute the department head and manager positions of the city: (a) Department head. positions: (i) Director of Community Development (ii) Director of Finance (iii) Director of Housing (iv) Director of Public Works (v) Director of Recreation and Community Services (vi) Chief of Police (b) Manager positions: (i) Assistant to the Chief Executive Officer (ii) Chief Deputy City Clerk (iii) Engineering Manager (iv) Personnel /Risk Manager (v) Redevelopment Project Manager (B) (2) The City Manager may appoint qualified persons to a vacant department head or manager position, on a temporary basis, for a period of less than 30 days, without City Council consent; temporary appointments for more than 30 days shall require City Council consent, and such persons shall serve at the pleasure of the City Council. (C) City Manager appointees. Persons holding any of the following positions shall be "at- will" employees, appointed by, and serve at the pleasure of the City Manager: (1) All part -tithe employees. (2) All temporary employees, except as set forth in paragraph (2) of Division (B) of this Section. (3) Any position which is funded, in whole or in part, by a state or federal grant. SECTION 3. The changes effected by this ordinance as to department heads are intended to be declaratory of existing practice as contained in the employment agreements of such persons, and shall not be deemed to affect any term or provision of any such agreement. The changes effected by this ordinance shall have no effect on the employment status or rights of persons employed by the city as managers as of the effective date of this ordinance, but shall be given effect only to persons employed in such positions after the effective date of this ordinance. SECTION 4. The City Council finds that in order to best serve the citizens of the City of Baldwin Park, it is necessary and proper that department heads and managers be responsive and responsible to the City Manager and the City Council as at -will employees serving at the pleasure of the City Council. The City Council further finds that the City is currently recruiting persons to fill a position as manager, and the public health, safety and welfare will be promoted by the retention of such new employee prior to the date an ordinance effecting the changes herein could otherwise become effective. Based upon such finding, the City Council therefore declares this ordinance is an urgency measure adopted by a vote of not less than four (4) of the City Council Members which shall take effect immediately upon adoption. SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this ordinance and shall have it published in accordance with the provisions of state law. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 2004. MANUEL LOZANO, MAYOR ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF BAL,DWIN PARK ) I, ROSEMARY M. RAMIREZ, Chief Deputy City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council on , 2004 and thereafter was duly adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting on , 2004 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: ROSEMARY M. RAMIREZ CHIEF DEPUTY CITY CLERK ORDINANCE NO, 1226 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING SECTIONS 31.03 AND 33.05 OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE TO PLACE MANAGERS IN THE UNCLASSIFIED SERVICE AND TO CONFORM THE ORDINANCE RELATING TO DEPARTMENT HEAD EMPLOYMENT TO THE CURRENT PRACTICES. WHEREAS, the Baldwin Park Municipal Code currently provides that all employees of the City, unless otherwise specified, are included within the Classified Service of the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to make all future employees filling positions as managers at -will employees not subject to the Classified Service of the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council further desires to conform the provisions of the Municipal Code relating to the hiring and termination of department heads to the actual practices as to such positions. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. A new subsection (W) is added to Section 31.03 of the Baldwin Parr Municipal Code to read as follows: (W) The CEO shall plan, direct, supervise, coordinate, and evaluate persons appointed to manager positions in the same manner as is established by this Section for department heads. The CEO may delegate these responsibilities as appropriate for administration of City operations. The positions of department head and manager are those described in paragraph (1) of Division (B) of Section 33.05 of this Code. SECTION 2. Section 33.05 of the Baldwin Parr Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 33.05 UNCLASSIFIED SERVICE EMPLOYEES The persons now, or hereafter, holding any of the following positions shall be deemed to be included within the unclassified service of the city. Unclassified service employees shall not be subj ect to the provisions of this chapter with reference to the city's personnel system; nor shall the unclassified service employees be subject to, or governed by, the provisions of the city's personnel rules and regulations. Appointments to, and dismissals from, positions in the unclassified service shall be governed, exclusively, by the provisions of §§ 33.02 through 33.07. (A) City Council appointees. Persons holding any of the positions enumerated in this division shall be "at- will" employees, appointed by, and serve at the pleasure of, the City Council: (1) Any person employed by the city as an independent contractor for the purpose of performing a specific function or service. (2) The City Manager. (3) The City Attorney. (4) Department heads and manager positions. (B) (1) Department head and manager positions. The following positions constitute the department head and manager positions of the city: (a) Department head positions: (i) Director of Community Development (ii) Director of Finance (iii) Director of Housing (iv) Director of Public Works (v) Director of Recreation and Community Services (vi) Chief of Police (b) Manager positions: (i) Assistant to the Chief Executive Officer (ii) Chief Deputy City Clerk (iii) Engineering Manager (iv) Personnel /Risk Manager (v) Redevelopment Project Manager (B) (2) The City Manager may appoint qualified persons to a vacant department head or manager position, on a temporary basis, for a period of less than 30 days, without City Council consent, temporary appointments for more than 30 days shall require City Council consent, and such persons shall serve at the pleasure of the City Council. (C) City Manager appointees. Persons holding any of the following positions shall be "at- will" employees, appointed by, and serve at the pleasure of the City Manager: (1) All part-time employees. (2) All temporary employees, except as set forth in paragraph (2) of Division (R.) . of this Section. (3) Any position which is funded, in whole or in part, by a state or federal grant. SECTION 3. The changes effected by this ordinance as to department heads are intended to be declaratory of existing practice as contained in the employment agreements of such persons, and shall not be deemed to affect any tern or provision of any such agreement. The changes effected by this ordinance shall have no effect on the employment status or rights of persons employed by the city as managers as of the effective date of this ordinance, but shall be given effect only to persons employed in such positions after the effective date of this ordinance. SEC'T'ION 4. The City Cleric shall certify to the passage of this ordinance and shall have it published in accordance with the provisions of state law. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 2004. MANUEL LOZANO, MAYOR ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss: CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ) 1, ROSEMARY M. RAMIREZ, Chief Deputy City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Parr, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council on , 2004 and thereafter was duly adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting on , 2004 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: ROSEMARY M. RAMIREZ CHIEF DEPUTY CITY CLERK ORDINANCE NO. 1 225 AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING SECTION 33.05 OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE TO PLACE MANAGERS IN THE UNCLASSIFIED SERVICE AND TO CONFORM THE ORDINANCE RELATING TO DEPARTMENT HEAD EMPLOYMENT TO THE CURRENT PRACTICES. WHEREAS, the Baldwin. Park Municipal Code currently provides that all employees of the City, unless otherwise specified, are included within the Classified Service of the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to make all future employees filling positions as managers at -will employees not subject to the Classified Service of the City; and WHEREAS, the City is currently in the process of recruiting for persons to fill a vacant manager position and wishes to hire such person as an at -will employee; and WHEREAS, the City Council further desires to conform the provisions of the Municipal. Code relating to the hiring and termination of department heads to the actual practices as to such positions. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 33.05 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code is .hereby amended to read as follows: § 33.05 UNCLASSIFIED SERVICE EMPLOYEES The persons now, or hereafter, holding any of the following positions shall be deemed to be included within the unclassified service of the city. Unclassified service employees shall not be subj ect to the provisions ofthis chapter with reference to the city's personnel system; nor shall the unclassified service employees be subject to, or governed by, the provisions of the city's personnel rules and regulations. Appointments to, and dismissals from, positions in the unclassified service shall be governed, exclusively, by the provisions of §§ 33.02 through 33.07. (A) City Council appointees. Persons bolding any of the positions enumerated in this division shall be "at -will" employees, appointed by, and serve at the pleasure of, the City Council: (1) Any person employed by the city as an independent contractor for the purpose of performing a specific function or service. (2) The City Manager. (3) The City Attorney. (4) Department heads. (B) (1) Department head and manager positions. The following positions constitute the department head and manager positions of the city: (a) Department head positions: (1) Director of Community Development (ii) Director of Finance (iii) Director of Housing (iv) Director of Public Works (v) Director of Recreation and Community Services (vi) Chief of Police (b) Manager positions. (1) Assistant to the Chief Executive Officer (ii) Chief Deputy City Clerk (iii) Engineering Manager (iv) Personnel/Risk Manager (v) Redevelopment Project Manager (B) (2) The City Manager may appoint qualified persons to a vacant department head position, on a temporary basis, for a period of less than 34 days, without City Council consent; temporary appointments for more than 30 days shall require City Council consent, and such persons shall serve at the pleasure of the City Council. (C) City Manager appointees. Persons holding any of the following positions shall be "at- will" employees, appointed by, and serve at the pleasure of the City Manager: (1) Manager positions. (2) All part-tune employees. (3) All temporary employees, except as set forth in paragraph (2) of Division (B) of this Section. (4) Any position which is funded, in whole or in part, by a state or federal grant. SECTION .3, The ch,anges effected by this ordinance as to depaAment heads are in tended to be declaratory of existing practice as contained in the employment agreements of such persons, and shall not be deemed to affect any term or provision of any such agreement. The changes effected by this ordinance shall have no effect on the employment status or rights of persons employed by the city as managers as of the effective date of this ordinance, but shall be given effect only to persons employed in such positions after the effective date of this ordinance. SECTION 4. The City Council finds that in order to best serve the citizens of the City of Baldwin Park, it is necessary and proper that department heads and managers be responsive and responsible to the City Manager and the City Council as at -will employees. The City Council further finds that the City is currently recruiting persons to fill a position as manager, and the public health, safety and welfare will be promoted by the retention of such new employee prior to the date an ordinance effecting the changes herein could otherwise become effective. Based upon such finding, the City Council therefore declares this ordinance is an urgency measure adopted by a vote of not less than four (4) of the City Council Members which shall take effect immediately upon adoption. SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this ordinance and shall have it published in accordance with the provisions of state law. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 2004. MANUEL LOZANO, MAYOR ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA j COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss: CITY OF BALDWIN PARK. } I, ROSEMARY M. RAMIREZ, Chief Deputy City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council on , 2004 and thereafter was duly adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting on , 2004 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: ROSEMARY M. RAMIREZ CHIEF DEPUTY CITY CLERK ORDINANCE NO. 1226 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING SECTION 33.05 OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE TO PLACE MANAGERS IN THE UNCLASSIFIED SERVICE AND TO CONFORM THE ORDINANCE RELATING TO DEPARTMENT HEAD EMPLOYMENT TO THE CURRENT PRACTICES. WHEREAS, the Baldwin Park Municipal Code currently provides that all employees of the City, unless otherwise specified, are included within the Classified Service of the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to make all. future employees filling positions as managers at -will employees not subject to the Classified Service of the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council further desires to conform the provisions of the Municipal Code relating to the hiring and termination of department heads to the actual practices as to such positions. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK. DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 33.05 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: § 33.05 UNCLASSIFIED SERVICE EMPLOYEES The persons now, or hereafter, holding any of the following positions shall be deemed to be included within the unclassified service of the city. Unclassified service employees shall not be subject to the provisions of this chapter with reference to the city's personnel system; nor shall the unclassified service employees be subject to, or governed by, the provisions of the city's personnel rules and regulations. Appointments to, and dismissals from, positions in the unclassified service shall be governed, exclusively, by the provisions of §§ 33.02 through 33.07. (A) City Council appointees. Persons holding any of the positions enumerated in this division shall be "at- will" employees, appointed by, and serve at the pleasure of, the City Council: (1) Any person employed by the city as an independent contractor for the purpose of performing a specific function or service. (2) The City Manager. (3) The City Attonicy. (4) Department heads. (B) (1) Department head and manager positions. The following positions constitute the department bead and mariager positions of the city: (a) Department head positions: (i) Director of Community Development (ii) Director of Finance (iii) Director of .Housing (iv) Director of Public Works (v) Director of Recreation and Community Services (vi) Chief of Police (b) Manager positions: (i) Assistant to the Chief Executive Officer (ii) Chief Deputy City Clerk (iii) Engineering Manager (iv) Personnel /Risk Manager (v) Redevelopment Project Manager (B) (2) The City Manager may appoint qualified persons to a vacant department head position, on a temporary basis, for a period of less than 30 days, without City Council consent; temporary appointments for more than 30 days shall require City Council consent, and such persons shall serve at the pleasure of the City Council. (C) City Manager appointees. Persons holding any of the following positions shall be "at- will" employees, appointed by, and serve at the pleasure of the City Manager: (1) Manager positions. (2) All part-time employees. (3) All temporary employees, except as set forth in paragraph (2) of Division (B) of this Section. (4) Anyposition which is funded, in whole or in part, by a state or federal grant. SECTION 3. The changes effected by this ordinance as to department heads are intended to be declaratory of existing practice as contained in the employment agreements of such persons, and shall not be deemed to affect any term or provision of any such agreement. The changes effected by this ordinance shall have no effect on the employment status or rights of persons employed by the city as managers as of the effective date of this ordinance, but shall be given effect only to persons employed in such positions after the effective date of this ordinance. ,SECTION S. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this ordinance and shall have it published in accordance with the provisions of state law. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 2004. MANUEL LOZANO, MAYOR ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss: CITY OF BALD WIN PARK ) I, ROSEMARY M. RAMIREZ, Chief Deputy City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council on , 2004 and thereafter was duly adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting on , 2004 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: ROSEMARY M. RAMIREZ CHIEF DEPUTY CITY CLERK CHAPTER 31: CITY OFFICIALS AND EMPLOYEES Section CHIEF EXECUTNE OFFICER Director of Administrative Services § 31.03 DUTIES. 31.45 Office created and established 31.46 Powers and duties 31.47 Bond Police and Public Safety Officers 31.60 Public safety dispatcher program Statutory reference: City officers generally, see Cal. Gov't Code §§ 36501 et seq. 5 2000 S -7 (A) The CEO shall plan, direct, and supervise the appointed department heads in the operations of the City. The CEO shall advise the City Council of the ongoing affairs of the City and receive and implement, as appropriate, policy direction from the City Council. The CEO shall provide administrative direction for all department heads and the "E" -Team, and oversee the municipal and redevelopment service functions and activities. Chief Executive Officer 131.01 OFFICE CREATED AND 31.01 Office created and established ESTABLISHED. 31.02 Eligibility 31.03 Duties There is hereby created in the unclassified service 31.04 Removal of the city the position of Chief Executive Officer, 31.05 Compensation (hereinafter referred to as "CEO ") who , sha11 serve 31.06 Terminology directly under the supervision and control of the Council in a purely at will, administrative capacity and City Attorney whose powers and duties shall be as set forth in §§ 31.02 through 31.06. 31.15 Office created ('83 Code, § 2.04.010) (Am. Ord. 1131, passed 3116 Appointment 5 -6 -98) 31.17 Duties 31.18 Deputies, special counsel 31.19 Removal § 31.02 ELIGIBILITY. 31.20 Compensation No member of the City Council shall be eligible City Clerk; City Treasurer for an appointment as CEO during his term as such, nor within one year after he has ceased to be a 31.30 Duties member of the Council. 31.31 Compensation ('83 Code, § 2.04.020) (Am. Ord. 1131, passed 31.32 Expenses 5 -6 -98) 31.33 Deputies Director of Administrative Services § 31.03 DUTIES. 31.45 Office created and established 31.46 Powers and duties 31.47 Bond Police and Public Safety Officers 31.60 Public safety dispatcher program Statutory reference: City officers generally, see Cal. Gov't Code §§ 36501 et seq. 5 2000 S -7 (A) The CEO shall plan, direct, and supervise the appointed department heads in the operations of the City. The CEO shall advise the City Council of the ongoing affairs of the City and receive and implement, as appropriate, policy direction from the City Council. The CEO shall provide administrative direction for all department heads and the "E" -Team, and oversee the municipal and redevelopment service functions and activities. Z Baldwin Park - Administration (B) The CEO shall direct and participate in the development and implementation of goals, objectives, policies, and procedures for the city government, as directed by the City Council, including the city's economic development and housing programs. (C) The CEO shall assist the City Council by coordinating, through the "E" -team, the various departments, divisions and services of the City government. The CEO shall also confer with the "F-team concerning administrative and operational problems, and make appropriate decisions and recommendations. (D) The CEO shall provide administrative oversight, support motivation and coordination of the City's Executive Team ( "E "- Team). The CEO shall preside at all "E" -Team meetings as the Chairperson of the "E" -Team. (E) The CEO shall conduct ongoing evaluations of all city departments to ensure that there is a consistent and high level of effectiveness and efficiency in all services provided (F) The CEO shall conduct personnel evaluations of all department heads at a minimum of an annual basis on behalf of the City Council. Evaluations of department heads will be reviewed by the City Council upon completion, The CEO shall also be responsible for the administration of the personnel division. The CEO shall designate a qualified officer or employee of the City to act as Personnel Officer, The City Council shall be informed of all recruitment hiring, termination, and promotions of City personnel. (Cl) The CEO shall communicate new ideas proposed by department heads and employees with respect to the operations of the City Council. (H) The CEO shall ensure that the City Council is informed on all significant matters, especially with respect to finance and the economic well -being of the City. The CEO shall develop a mechanism, including weekly updates, to ensure full Communication between city staff and the City Council. 2400 S -7 (1) The CEO shall tactfully and diplomatically present professional views, concerns and short- term/long -range implications of proposed policy action which may be under considerations, within the context of the uniqueness of Baldwin Park, while also being committed to ensuring that all Council decisions are enacted in a timely, effective, professional and impartial manner. The CEO shall perform an evaluation with respect to whether the policies of the City Council have been enacted. (J) The CEO shall attend meetings of the Council with duty of reporting on or discussing any matter concerning the affairs of the departments, services, or activities upon which in his judgment the Council should be informed. (K) The CEO shall assist the Council and the "E "-Team in coordinating the administrative functions and operations of the various departments, divisions and services of the city government, and, on its behalf, carry out the policies, rules and regulations and ordinances adopted but it, relating to the administrative of the affairs of such departments, divisions or services, (L) The CEO shall bring to the attention of the council problem areas which require council intervention. The CEO shall have the full authority to access all documents and computer records within each respective department for audit and evaluation purposes. (M) The CEO shall cooperate with all community organizations whose aim and purpose it is to advance the spiritual and material interests of the city and its people and to provide them with assistance through the city government. He or she shall encourage direct contact between City Councilmembers and said community organizations. (N) The CEO shall not exercise any policy - making or legislative functions whatsoever nor attempt to commit or bind the Council or any member thereof to any action, plan or program requiring official Council action. It is not intended by this Chapter to City Officials and Employees grant any authority to, or impose any duty upon said CEO which is vested in or imposed by general law or valid ordinances in any other City commission, board, department, officer or employee. (0) The CEO shall endeavor at all times to exercise the highest degree of tact, patience and courtesy in his contacts with the public and with all City commissions, boards, departments, officers and employees and shall use his best efforts to establish and maintain a harmonious relationship between all personnel employees in the government of the city to the end that highest possible standards of public service be continuously maintained (P) The CEO shall perform such other duties as may be required of him or her from time to time by the City Council. (Q) The CEO shall inform the City Council of all media contacts or communications directed at the city and shall coordinate the City's responses to media inquiries. The CEO may be the spokesperson for the city on a case by cases basis where authorized by the City Council; however, when the CEO serves as media spokesperson, the City Council shall not be prohibited from or impeded from or impeded in any way from communicating with the media. (R) The CEO shall monitor each department in the preparation and submittal to the Council of the itemized annual estimates of expenditures required by any of the departments for capital outlay, salaries, wages and miscellaneous operating casts: to ensure and facilitate the presentation of a preliminary consolidated municipal budget and ensure the submittal of same to the Council before the 15th of June of each year with such recommendations as to such changes which he deems advisable. (S) The CEO shall monitor the administration of the budget by each of the departments after its final adoption and keep the Council informed with respect thereto. (T) The CEO shall monitor and inform the Council of the expenditures of all departments, divisions or services of the city government and 6A appoint a purchasing agent upon council confirmation, for the purchase of all supplies, goods, wares, merchandise, equipment and material which may be required for any of such departments, divisions or services. (U) The CEO shall interpret, analyze and explain the City's policies, procedures and programs. (V) The CEO shall be the Emergency Services Director and shall coordinate emergency services as required by local, state and federal law. ('83 Code, § 2.04.030) (Ord. 845, passed - -82; (Am. Ord. 1131, passed 5 -6 -98; Am. Ord. 1146, passed 10 -6 -99) § 31.04 REMOVAL. (A) The CEO shall serve at the pleasure of the City Council, but he shall not be removed from office except: (1) At a regular, adjourned, or special meeting of the City Council; and (2) By a motion carried by not less than the affirmative votes of three members of the City Council, (B) In removing the CEO, the City Council shall use its uncontrolled discretion, and its action shall be final and conclusive. ('83 Code, § 2.04,040) (Am. Ord. 1131, passed 5 -6 -98) § 31.05 COMPENSATION. The City Council shall, from time to time, establish the compensation to be paid to the CEO. ('83 Code, § 2.04.050) (Am. Ord. 1131, passed 5 -6 -98) § 31.06 TERMINOLOGY. All references in the Baldwin Park Municipal Code and ordinances and resolutions of the City M. w Baldwin Park - Administration Council to the office or position of the "City Manager" and the like shall mean and refer to the CEO except where such provisions are inconsistent with Urgency Ordinance 1074 and 1110 and the provisions of §§ 3 1. 01 to 31.06 unless the context of such a reference may require otherwise. Sections 31.01 to 31.06 shall take precedence with respect to any conflicts with Urgency Ordinance 1074 and 1110. ('83 Code, § 2.04.060) (Ord. 845, passed - -82; Am. Ord. 1131, passed 5 -6-98) Editor's Note: The city from time to time operates under alternative procedures in the absence of a City Manager. At the time of this codification, Urgency Ord. 1074, passed 10- 20-93, as amended by Ord. 1110, passed 1- 17 -96, delegates authority and functions to various department heads. P INI City 0friicish and Employ CITY ATI'GI?NEY § 31.15 OFFICE CREATED. The part-time position of the City Attorney for the city is created. ('83 Code, § 2.16.010) Statutory reference: City Attorney, see Cal. Gov't Code §§ 41801 et seq. § 31.16 APPOINTMENT. The City Council shall appoint a qualified person to the position of City Attorney. No person shall be eligible for appointment thereto unless he has been admitted to the practice of law in the state for at least five years. ('83 Code, § 2.16.020) § 31.17 DUTIES. The City Attorney shall act as the legal ii ivisor to all officers and employees of the city. ('83 Code, § 2.16.030) § 31.18 DEPUTIES; SPECIAL COUNSEL. With the approval of the City Manager, the City Attorney may appoint qualified persons as deputies. Compensation for such deputies, if any, shall be established by the City Council. With the approval of the City Council, special counsel may be appointed for special projects or matters in litigation. ('83 Code, § 2.16.040) § 32.19 REMOVAL. The City Attorney shall serve at the pleasure of the City Council, and may be removed, at any time, upon an affirmative vote of not less than three members of the Council. ('83 Code, § 2.16.050) § 31,20 COMP0PNS TIOV 7 The compensation for the position of City Attorney shall be set, from time to time, by resolution of the City Council. ('83 Code, § 2.16.060) CITY CLERK- CITY TREASURER § 31.30 DUTIES. The duties of the City Clerk and City Treasurer shall be those established by applicable law, and such other duties, consistent therewith, as may be assigned to those positions by the City Council. ('83 Code, § 2.20.010) Statutory references: City Clerk, see Cal. Gov't Code §§ 40801 et seq. City Treasurer, see Cal. Gov't Code §§ 41001 et seq. Cross - reference: Date of elections for City Clerk and City Treasurer, see § 30.05 § 31.31 COMPENSATION. The City Council shall, by resolution., from time to time, establish the compensation for the positions of City Clerk and City Treasurer. ('83 Code, § 2.20.020) § 31.32 EXPENSES. Subject to the approval of the City Council, the City Clerk and City Treasurer shall be entitled to advances and /or reimbursement for expenditures actually made or incurred, or, required to be made, in the respective performance of their official duties. ('83 Code, § 2.20.030) § 31.33 DEPUTIES. Both the City Clerk and the City Treasurer shall have the authority to appoint deputies to assist in the 8 )Bald: Pam = Admin tion performance of their respective duties. Compen- sation, if any, for those positions shall be established by the City Council. ('83 Code, § 2.20.040) DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES § 31.45 OFFICE CREATED AND ESTABLISHED. There is created and established the office of Director of Administrative Services. The office of Director of Administrative Services may be combined by the City Manager, with the approval of the City Council, with any other office or position having duties which are not inconsistent therewith. ('83 Code, § 2.24.010) § 31.46 POWERS AND DUTIES. The Director of Administrative Services shall be the head of the Finance Department of the city, and, under the direction of the City Manager, shall: (A) Perform all the financial and accounting duties heretofore imposed upon the City Clerk, and the City Clerk snail be relieved of such duties, including all duties imposed upon the City Clerk by Cal. Gov't Code §§ 40802 through 40805; and (B) Perform such other duties as may be imposed upon him by law or by this code, or by the City Manager, or by the City Council. ('83 Code, § 2.24.020) § 31.47 BOND. The Director of Administrative Services shall execute a surety bond in an amount set by the City Council, the premium on which shall be paid by the city. ('83 Code, § 2.24.030) .............. ............................... POLICE AND PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICERS § 31.60 PUBLIC SAFETY DISPATCHER PROGRAM. The city desires to qualify to receive aid from the state under provisions of Cal. Penal Code § 13522, Chapter I, of Title 4, Part 4. Pursuant to Cal. Penal Code § 13510(c), Chapter I, the Police Department will adhere to standards for recruitment and training established by the California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training (P.O.S.T.). Pursuant to Cal. Penal Code § 13512, Chapter I, the Commission and its representatives may make such inquiries as deemed appropriate by the Commission to ascertain that the Police Department's. public safety dispatcher personnel adhere to the standrds for selec- tion and training established by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. ('83 Code, § 1.30.010) (Ord. 1013, passed - -89) CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FEB - 4 2004 1 __ i Elul %Uq. q CITY OF BALDWIN PARK STAFF REPORT BALDWIN CONSENT CALENDAR F...Axx TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Dayle Keller, Chief Executive Office DATE: February 4, 2004 SUBJECT: Proposed Urgency and Regular Ordinance Relating to Unclassified Service Employees The purpose of this report is to provide background and make a recommendation for the adoption of an urgency ordinance and a regular ordinance relating to unclassified service employees . BACKGROUND At its meeting on January 14, 2004, the City Council discussed the possibility of changing the current Personnel/Risk Manager position to a department head position, or, in the alternative, keeping the current Personnel /Risk Manager position but designating it as at -will. Council expressed preference for the latter alternative and requested additional information. DISCUSSION The attached proposed ordinance and proposed urgency ordinance make the following changes to the subsection B (1) of section 33.05 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code: 1. Add the existing management positions to the section; 2. Update the list of department head positions to reflect those titles currently being used, and 3. Provide that all of the listed management positions will be at -will for future hires following the adoption of the urgency ordinance. There is currently a recruitment for the Personnel/Risk Manager position. That recruitment closes on February 9, 2004. Therefore, to. be able to fill that position with an at -will employee, an urgency ordinance is necessary. The employees currently filling management positions will not be affected by the ordinance. The ordinance will be applicable only to management personnel hired after February 4, 2004. Since management tai rayerilEr rt employees are d bargaining �y ur rrt: of are City, r will be sitting down with the existing management employees to meet and confer with them on the proposed ordinance prior to the Council meeting. A follow -up report related to that process will be provided on February 3. It is important to emphasize that the proposed ordinance gDly updates department head titles, and establishes an at -will status for future management hires. It is recognized that there may be other sections in Section 33 of the Code that Council may wish to review in the future to better reflect current practice. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact resulting from the proposed urgency ordinance or ordinance. It is anticipated that all salary ranges will remain as they are in the current salary resolution, and that any future changes will result from the same processes currently in existence, i.e., the meet and confer process, salary surveys, etc. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Waive further reading, read by title only and adopt an URGENCY Ordinance No. 1225 entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING SECTION 33.05 OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO UNCLASSIFIED SERVICE EMPLOYEES AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF," AND 2. Waive further reading, read by title only and introduce for first reading Ordinance No. 1226 entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING SECTION 33.05 OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO UNCLASSIFIED SERVICE EMPLOYEES." Attachments: 1. Proposed Ordinances 1225 and 1226 2. Chapter 33 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code ORDINVH€ CE N10. 1225 URGENCY AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING SECTION 33.05 OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO UNCLASSIFIED SERVICE EMPLOYEES AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF. WHEREAS, the Baldwin Park Municipal Code currently provides that all employees of the City, unless otherwise specified, are included within the Classified Service of the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to make all future employees filling positions as managers at -will employees not subject to the Classified Service of the City; and WHEREAS, the City is currently in the process of recruiting for persons to fill a vacant manager position and wishes to hire such person as an at -will employee. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Subsection (B) (1) of Section 33.05 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: (B) (1) Department head and manager positions. The following positions constitute the department head and manager positions of the city: (a) Department head positions: (i) Director of Community Development (ii) Director of Finance (iii) Director of Housing (iv) Director of Public Works (v) Director of Recreation and Community Services (vi) Chief of Police (b) Manager positions. (i) Assistant to the Chief Executive Officer (ii) Chief Deputy City Clerk (iii) Engineering Manager (iv) Personnel /Risk Manager (v) Redevelopment Project Manager Ordinance No. 1225 Page 2 [±�nT].!'1_!+I C+. .l....., T.....,a..:. f7�. /�1\ r Section n.n .[1..f" G ,..�.._ I'S._.t.�.. Park "_. .. F SCV I l"'N 2. t�7LILJsectfori (D) � of Sectio I J�.VJ of L[IC L7 c3tUVlf1[� Pa,K {11111�iI i�c�[ Code is hereby amended to read as follows: (B) (2) Appointments to any department head position shall be made by the City Manager, with the consent of the City Council. The City Manager may appoint qualified persons to a vacant department head position, on a temporary basis, for a period of less than 30 days, without City Council consent; temporary appointments for more than 30 days shall require City Council consent. Each appointee to a department head position shall serve in such position at the will and pleasure of the City Manager, and shall be deemed an "at -will" employee. A person holding a department head position may, at any time, with or without cause, be terminated by the City Manager, with the consent of the City Council. SECTION 3. Subsection (B) (3) of Section 33.05 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: (B) (3) Appointments to any manager position shall be made by the City Manager. Each appointee to a manager position shall serve in such position at the will and pleasure of the City Manager, and shall be deemed an "at -will" employee. A person holding a manager position may, at any time, with or without cause, be terminated by the City Manager. SECTION 4. This ordinance shall have no effect on the employment status or rights of persons employed by the city as department heads and managers as of the effective date of this ordinance, but shall be prospective only. SECTION 5. The City Council finds that in order to best serve the citizens of the City of Baldwin Park, it is necessary and proper that department heads and managers be responsive and responsible to the City Manager and the City Council as at -will employees serving at the pleasure of the City Manager. The City Council further finds that due to the fact that the City is currently recruiting persons to fill a position as manager, and wishes to have such new employee serve at the pleasure of the City Manager, it therefore declares that this ordinance is an urgency measure and shall take effect immediately upon adoption. SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this ordinance and shall have it published in accordance with the provisions of state law. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 2004. MANUEL LOZANO MAYOR Ordinance No. 1225 Page 3 ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES } ss: CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ) I, KATHLEEN R. SESSMAN, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted on URGENCY by the City Council at a regular meeting on by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: KATHLEEN R. SESSMAN DEPUTY CITY CLERK ORDINANCE NO. 1226 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING SECTION 33.05 OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO UNCLASSIFIED SERVICE EMPLOYEES. WHEREAS, the Baldwin Park Municipal Code currently provides that all employees of the City, unless otherwise specified, are included within the Classified Service of the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to make all future employees filling positions as managers at -will employees not subject to the Classified Service of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Subsection (B) (1) of Section 33.05 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: (B) (1) Department head and manager positrons. The following positions constitute the department head and manager positions of the city: (a) Department head positions: (i) Director of Community Development (ii) Director of Finance (iii) Director of Housing (iv) Director of Public Works (v) Director of Recreation and Community Services (vi) Chief of Police (b) Manager positions: (i) Assistant to the Chief Executive Officer (ii) Chief Deputy City Clerk (iii) Engineering Manager (iv) Personnel /Risk Manager (v) Redevelopment Project Manager SECTION 2. Subsection (B) (2) of Section 33.05 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: (B) (2) Appointments to any department head position shall be made by the City Manager, with the consent of the City Council. The City Manager may appoint qualified persons to a vacant department head position, on a temporary basis, for a period of less than 30 days, without City Council consent; temporary appointments for more than 30 days shall require City Council consent. Each appointee to a department head position shall serve in such position at the will and pleasure of the City Manager, and shall be deemed an "at- will„ employee. A person holding a department head position may, at any time, with or without cause, be terminated by the City Manager, with the consent of the City Council. Ordinance No. 1226 Page 2 SECTION 3. Subsection (B) (3) of Section 33.05 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: (B) (3)Appointments to any manager position shall be made by the City Manager. Each appointee to a manager position shall serve in such position at the will and pleasure of the City Manager, and shall be deemed an "at- will" employee. A person holding a manager position may, at any time, with or without cause, be terminated by the City Manager. SECTION 4. This ordinance shall have no effect on the employment status or rights of persons employed by the city as department heads and managers as of the effective date of this ordinance. SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this ordinance and shall have it published in accordance with the provisions of state law. - PASSED AND APPROVED ON THE day of MANUEL LOZANO MAYOR ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA j COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss: CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ) I, KATHLEEN SESSMAN, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was regularly introduced and placed upon it's first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on . That thereafter said Ordinance was duly approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: KATHLEEN R. SESSMAN DEPUTY CITY CLERK Section CHAPTER 33: PERSONNEL SYSTFM Qassi,fled and Unclassified Service 33.01 Creation and purpose 33.02 Status of officers and employees 33.03 Elective officers of the city 33.04 Classified service officers or 33.24 employees 33.05 Unclassified service employees 33.06 Salaries 33.07 New positions 33.08 Adoption of rules 33.09 Appointment to and removal from system 33.10 _ : Council. not. to interfere with appointments or removals. Co-,dWons of Employment 33.20 Basic salary plan; 33.21 Holidays 33.22 Discrimination 33:23 Retirement 33.24 Absence because of injury 33.25 Reimbursement for damage to personal property 33.26 Political activities 33.27 Contract for services 33.28 Appropriation of funds Reduction. in Fork Force 33.40, Purpose 33.41 Definitions 33.42 Procedure 33.43 Demotion 33.44 - Subsequent demotion or termination 33.45 Reemployment list 15 CLASSIFIED AND UNCLASSIFIED SERVICE § 33.01 CREATION AND PURPOSE. The purpose of the personnel system created by this chapter, is to: (A) Establish an equitable and uniform pro- cedure for attracting to the system the best and most competent persons available; (B) Assure that appointments and promotions of employees in. the system will be based on merit and fitness as determined by competitive tests; (C) Provide .a reasonable degree of security fo€ employees in the systerri; and: (D) Insure to the city a staff of loyal, qualified and competent employees. ('83 Code, § 2.56-010) Statutory reference. Personnel system, see Cal. Gov't Code §§ 45000 . et seq. § 33.02 STATUS OF OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES. The City Council shall adopt, by resolution, a classification plan prepared by the City Manager for all positions in the classified and unclassified service pursuant to §§ 33.02 through 33.07. Ali officers and employees of the city shall be included in one of the categories specified in §§ 33.02 through 33.47. ('83 Code, §. 2.56.020) 16 Baldwin Park - Administration § 33.03 ELECTIVE OFFICERS OF THE CITY. The elective officers of the city shall be the following: (A) Mayor. (B) Each member of the City Council. (C) City Clerk, (D) City Treasurer. ('83 Code, § 2.56.030 §. 33.04 CLASSIFIED SERVICE OFFICERS OR EMPLOYEES. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this section, all full -time officers and employees of the city shall be deemed, for all purposes, to be included within the city's personnel system, and such persons shall be referred to as employees in the "classified service.' All employment rights and duties of employees in the classified service shall be subject to the provisions of this chapter and of the personnel rules and regulations of the city. ('83 Code, § 2.56.040) § 33.05 UNCLASSIFIED SERVICE EMPLOYEES. The persons now, or hereafter, holding any of the following positions shall be deemed to be included within the unclassified service of the city. Unclassified service employees shall not be subject to the provisions of this chapter with reference to the city's ,:personnel system; nor shall the unclassified service employees be subject to, or governed by, the provisions of the city's personnel rules and regula- tions. Appointments to,, and dismissals from, posi- tions in the unclassified service shall be governed, exclusively, by the provisions of §§ 33.02 through 33.0"x. (A) City Council appointees. Persons holding any of.the positions enumerated in this division shall be appointed by, and serve at the pleasure of, the City Council: (1) Any person employed by the city as an independent contractor for the purpose of performing a specific function or service. (2) The City Manager. (3) The Fire Chief. (4) The City Attorney. (B) (I) Department head positions. The following positions constitute the department head positions of: the city. vices. ment. (a) Director of Administrative Ser- (b) Director of Coriununity Develop- (c) Director of Human Services. (d) Director of Public Works. (e) Police Chief. (2) Appointments to any department head position shall be made by the City Manager, with the consent of the City Council. Each appointee to a department head position shall serve in such position at the will and pleasure of the City Manager, and shall be deemed to be an "at will" employee. A person holding a department head position may, at any time, with or without cause, be terminated by the City Manager, with the consent of the City Council. (3) The City Manager may appoint quali- fied persons to a vacant department head position, on a temporary basis, far a period less than 30 days, without City Council consent; temporary appoint- ments for more than 30 days, shall require City Council consent. (4) Where the consent of the City Council is required pursuant to this division, such consent shall be expressed by a motion; made, seconded and carried, by not less the three affirmative votes of Council members, at a duly held regular or special Personnel System meeting of the City Council. Decisions of the City Manager, to which the City Council has consent shall be final and conclusive.. (C) City Manager appointees. Persons holding any of the following positions shall be appointed by, and serve at the pleasure of the City Manager: (1) All part -tirne. employees. (2) All temporary employees. (3) Any position which is funded, in whole or in part, by a state or federal grant. ('83 Code, § 2.56.050) (Ord: 845, passed: - -92; Am. Ord. 1421, passed - -89; Am. Ord. 1046, passed - -91) § 33.06 SALARIES. Salaries and fringe benefits for each position referred to in §§ 33.42 through 33.07 shall be established by the City Council. ('83 !-ode, § 2.56.060) § 33.07 NEW POSITIONS. The City Council may, as recommended by the City Manager, create new positions in city employment. Any new full - time position shall be deemed to be in the classified service, unless the City Council otherwise directs. ('83 Code, § 2.56.070) § 33.05 ADOPTION OF RULES. Personnel rules, as recommended by the City Manager, subject to the provisions of this chapter, shall be submitted for approval to the City Council (hereinafter referred to as "rules"). The rules shall establish specific procedures and regulations governing the phases of the personnel system: The rules may be amended from time to time, by the City Council, as may be required. ('83 Code, § 2.56.080) 17 § 33.09 APPOINTMENT TO AND REMOVAL; FROM SYSTEM.. Persons shall be appointed. to, and removed from, positions in the classified service in the time and manner provided in the rules. ('83 Code, § 2.56.094) § 3110 COUNCIL NOT TO INTERFERE WITH APPOINTMENTS OR REMOVALS. Neither the City Council, nor any of its members, shall direct or request the appointment of any person to, or his removal from, office by the City Manager,, or in any manner take part in the appoint- ment or removal of officers and employees in the set- vice of the city, except as specified in this chapter. Except for the P inquiry, se of the Council and its members shall deal;' with city employees solely.' through the City Manager. ('83 Coale, § M6. 100) CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT " § 33.20 BASIC SALARY PLAN. The City Council shall adopt, by resolution, a- basic salary plan for all officers and employees of the city. The salary plan may, from time to time, be amended as required by the public interest. ('83 Code, § 2.56.170) § 33.21 HOLIDAYS. Holidays for all city officers and employees shall be those designated by resolution of the City Council. ('83 Code, ¢ 2.56. 180) § 33.22 DISCRIMINATION. No .person in employ of the city or seeking admission. thereto, shall be employed, promoted, 18 Baldwin Park - Administration demoted or discharged, or in any way favored or dis- criminated against because of political opinions or affiliations, race, color, religious belief, age, sex, or sexual orientation. ('83 Code, § 2.56.190) (CO. Labor Code § 1102.1) § 33.23 RETIREMENT A contract is authorized between the city and the Board of Administration of the Public Employees Retirement System, providing retirement benefits for officirs and employees of the city. ('83 Code, § 2.56.200) § 33,24 ABSENCE BECAUSE OF INJURY. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this chapter, or any other rule or regulation, the absence of any officer or employee from his position, caused by injury or disease for which he is entitled to compensation pursuant to Cal. Lab. Code §§ 3201 et seq., shall not constitute a break in the person's con- tinuous service for the purpose of salary adjustments, sick leave, vacation leave or seniority rights,. ('83 Cade, § 2.56.210) § 33.25 REUUBURSEMENT FOR DAMAGE TO PERSONAL PROPERTY. Any employee who suffers damage, without negligence on his part, to his personal property, while in the performance of his duties shall be reimbursed for the damage upon a determination by the City Manager that such damage occurred in the course of his employ, and that the amount claimed is reasonable. Upon approval of the item by the City Manager, a warrant in that amount, payable to the employee suffering the darhage, shall be submitted to the City Council for approval at its next most. con- venient regular Council meeting. ('83 Code, § 2.56.220) § 33.26 POLITICAL ACTIVITIES. No person, other than elective officers, while in the employ of the city, in any capacity, shall engage in any political activity during the time as such person is on duty. No city employee shall engage in any political activity, at any time, while wearing a city uniform, or other distinctive part thereof. ('83 Code, § 2.56.230) § 33.27 CONTRACT FOR SERVICES. The City Council shall have authority to enter into contracts, with qualified persons, for the per - formance of any perso hnel function: {'83 Code, § 2.56.240) § 33.28 APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS. The City Council shall, from time to time, appropriate such funds as it deems necessary to carry out the provisions of this chapter. ('83 Code, § 2.56250) DEDUCTION IN WORK FORCE § 33.40 PURPOSE. The purpose of this subchapter is to establish an equitable and reasonable procedure for the lay -off of employees of the city for economy purposes. ('83 Code, § 2.56. 110) § 33.41 DEFINITIONS. For the purpose of this subchapter, the following definitions shall apply unless the context clearly: indicates or requires a different meaning. DEMOTION. The demotion of an employee to a lesser position included within the same family of positions, occasioned by a reduction in force. city. EMPLOYEE. Any full -time employee of the Personnel System FAMILY OF POSITIONS. A group of related positions which have been designated as such by resolution of the City Council, as recommended by the City Manager. As a part of such designation, each position in each family shall be ranked for the purpose of establishing a line of lesser positions for the purpose of the demotion process, where such is ordered to effect a reduction in force. LENGTH OF SERVICE. The total number of years of an employee's employment by the city, including the time spent in a probationary, pro -; - visional or leave status by any such employees LESSER POSITION. A position having a lesser ranking than one or more other positions in a family of positions. NOTICE. Where notice is required pursuant to this subchapter, it shall be in written form, and given by personal service or by depositing the notice in the custody of the United States Postal Service, postage prepaid, addressed to the person to be notified at his last -known address. The notice shall be deemed, for all purposes, to h,--,e been given: as of the time of personal service, or, as of the time of its deposit in: the custody of the United States Postal Service. POSITION. A position of employment in the classified service, as defined in §§ 33.02 through 33.07. ('83 Code, § 2.56.120) § 33.42 PROCEDURE. Whenever the City Council determines, in its discretion, that for reasons of economy, a reduction in the number of employees of the city is required, the City Manager shall proceed with such a reduction in force by demotion and/or termination in accord- ance with the provisions of this subchapter. ('83 Code, § 2.56.130) § 33.43 DEMOTION. (A) Family of positions. Where reduction in force involves a position that is included within a family of positions, each employee holding the 19 position shall be ranked, based upon his length of service with the city. The employee holding the position having a lesser length of service shall be demoted to the neat lower position within the family of positions. The City Manager shall give written notice of the demotion to each employee to be demoted: Such order of demotion shall be effective° on the 30th day after the giving of the notice. If within ten days after the giving of the notice, an employee files with the City Manager a written state meat declining the demotion, that employee's employ- ment with the city shall be terminated effective on the 30th day after the giving of the notice. Any employee who is demoted pursuant hereto, shall not be subject to further demotion, by a subsequent reduction in force order, for a period of one year after the effective date of the order of demotion. (B) Request far reassignment. An employee proposed to be demoted pursuant to division (A) of this section may request, subject to the approval of the City Manager, a reassignment to a lesser position in the family, of positions. (C) Positions not included within a family of positions. Where an ordered reduction in force involves a position which is not included within a family of positions, if only one employee holds the position, he shall be terminated from the city's employment, effective on the 30th day after the giving of notice of termination by the City Manager. If more than one employee holds such a position, all employees holding the position shall be ranked based upon their length of service with the city; an order of termination shall be given as to the employee or employees having the lesser lengths of service in the position. (D) Salary determination. An employee affected by this section shall be placed in the salary range of the position and the step closest to the salary held in the former position but not in excess thereof. ('83 Code, § 2.56.140) 20 Baldwin hark - Administration § 33.44 SUBSEQUENT DEMOTION OR TERIa'"ATION. Where one or more. employees have been demoted from a position within a family of positions, by reason of an ordered reduction in force, other employees bolding the lesser positions in such family shall be subject to the same demotion process, upon direction of the City Manager in the time and manner as set forth in § 33.43. Where an employee bolding a position, which is ranked last in a family of posi- tions, is preempted the position by reason of the demotion process, he shall, upon the 30th day alter the g Ving of notice thereof, be terminated from the city's service. ('83 Code, §: 2.56. 150) 33.45 REEM LOYA4ENT LIST. An employee who is demoted to a lesser posi- tion, or who is teraiina.ted by reason of a reduction in force, accomplished pursuant to this subchapter, shall, autornatically, have his name placed on a re- employment list for the position which he formerly held. The ranking of names upon the reemployment list shall be in accordance with the employee's length of service with the city in that position. The re- employment list shall have priority for a period of one year over. any other eligibility list for the affected position; ('8.3 Code, § 2.56.160) BIDDER'S LOG SHEET POR 2003 -2004 CDBG Streets Slurry Seal Project CIP 862 Engineer's Estimate ($270,000) ,� f%ACT. ltor, nn BIDDERM ADDRESS PHONE FAX .41 11) Y1 avl%l 11 vl. 5k q q 2-4 rim+7wi, CIA 91, 42-s - P) .12) 13) 14) 15) 16) W) 18) 19) :20) F- c:\wpdocskfomMforml \bidlog.for - _...... AGENCY AGENDA . �.. UNAPPROVEDIUNOFFICIAL C.Uu4 COUNCIL CHAMBER. FEBRjjL%YqW 2n0a I 14403 E. PACIFIC AVENUE WEDNESDAY BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 7:00 P.M. The COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of the City of Baldwin Park met in REGULAR SESSION at the above time and place. ROLL CALL Present: Member Marlen Garcia, David Olivas, Ricardo Pacheco, Vice -Chair Bill Van Cleave, and Chair Manuel Lozano Also Present: Dayle Keller, Executive Director; Stephanie Scher, Agency Attorney; Mark Kling, Chief of Police; Jose Sanchez, Finance Director; Shafique Nalyer, Public Works Director; Melecio Picazo, Interim Community Development Director; Manny Carrillo, Recreation and Community Services Director; Dolores Gonzalez- Hayes, Housing Director; Kathryn Tizcareno, City Clerk; Maria A. Contreras, City Treasurer; and Kathleen Sessman, Deputy City Clerk CONSENT CALENDAR APPROVED A motion was made to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. A -C as presented, and as follows: MOTION: Member Olivas SECOND: Chair Lozano Carried MINUTES The minutes of January 21, 2004, were approved as presented. WARRANTS AND DEMANDS Warrant Register No. 592 was received and filed. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TRANSMITTAL OF THE DRAFT REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR AMENDMENT 2004 TO THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA Further reading was waived, read by title only and Resolution No. 387 entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE BALDWIN PARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AUTHORIZING THE TRANSMITTAL OF THE DRAFT REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR AMENDMENT 2004 TO THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION," was adopted. REPORTS OF OFFICERS SIERRA EXPANSION PROJECT - RELOCATION PLAN A motion was made to approve the Relocation Plan as presented. MOTION: Member Olivas SECOND: Vice -Chair Van Cleave Carried vommunity Redevelopment Agency — February 4, 2004 Page 2 COUNCIL 1 STAFF REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS. Member Pacheco requested a status update on the Walgreen issue and requested Walgreen representative be present to answer Council questions. Member Garcia announced that Senator Gloria Romero is having a press conference Thursday, February 5, 2004 to introduce legislation that requires physicians to take blood work and check for DUI's on any individual that comes in due to an accident and requiring insurance companies pay for it. She requested Council support of this effort. There were no objections. Member Garcia announced that there is a meeting Thursday, February 5, 2004 regarding the Storm Drain Issue. She requested a letter of support be drafted and presented at this meeting. There were no objections. Chair Lozano requested that code enforcement increase their monitoring of 99¢ Store, specifically behind the store. ADJOURNMENT There being no other matters before the Agency, the meeting was adjourned at 8:50 p.m. Approved as presented by the Agency at their meeting held Kathleen R. Sessman Deputy City Clerk Jose Sanchez Agency Secretary UUMMUNII Y Kr_Ur_UCL.UriVOtN I AGENCY AGENDA FEB 1 8 Z004 ITEM NO. REDEVELOPMENT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF BALDWIN PARK WARRANT REGISTER NO. 593 Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee 3322 SDC PARTNERS, LTD Claim# General Description 37354 JANUARY RENT SUB- STATION PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 1RENT01 /04 1CAM 1/04 GL Distribution 206 - 366 -5010A February 18, 2004 Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep RA 012021 01/15/04 306.00 Invc Dt C =r455 Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 01/01{04 1.00 0.00 1.00 01/01/04 365 XIO 0.00 305.00 Gross Amount bescription 366.00 JAN RENT 4iend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee 2938 BILL VAN CLEAVE Claim# General Description 37627 MONTHLY MTG ALLOWANCE RDA 01/04/04 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 0 UL Distribution .201 - 314 -5010A Sank Check# Chk Date Check Amount 'Sep RA 012023# 010/04 11D.Cu1 inve Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 01/29/04 110.00 0.00 110,00 Gross Amount Description 110,00 RDA MTG 01/04/04 +lend# Vendor flame Remit# Payee 6610 DAVID J OLIVAS Claim# General Description 57628 RDA MONTHLY MTG ALLOWANCE 01/04104 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 0 GL Distribution 201- 31A -5010A Bank Check# Chk date Check Amount Sep RA 012024 01/1'9/04 110.00 Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 01/29/04 110.00 0.00 110.00 Gross Amount Description 110.00 RDA MTG 01x`04%04 Vend# Vendor dame Remit# Payee Sunk Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 348 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP RA 012025 01/29/04 64.31 Claimt€ General Description 57429 EXPRESS MAIL TRK6# 840908584534 840908584523 840908584453 P01 Stat Contract# invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Uaed Net Amount 1- 538 -83187 01/04/04 54.31 0.00 64.31 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 206- 37A -5020A 25,58 840908584534 206- 37A -5020A 20.38 840908584523 206- 37A--S02OA 1835 840908584453 Vend# Vendor Dame 1682 /SANE, BALLMER & BERKMAN Claim# General Description 57030 NOVEMBER LEGAL SERVICES PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# GL Distribution 281- 00A -5020A Vend# Vendor Name 4899 kEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES, INC. Ciaim# General Description ~7631 NOVEMBER PROFESSIONAL SERVICE PO4 Stat Contract# IInvoice# 0004614 Remit# Payee Warrant Register No. 593 Page 2 Bank Chreck# Chk late Check Amount Sep RA 012026 01/29104 455.00 invc Dt gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 01/29/04 455.00 0.0 455.0 Gross Amount Description 455.00 NOV LEGAL SRV Remit# Payee Sank Check# Grit hate Check Atrount Sep IAA 012L27 01/29104 5,586.88 invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 01/14f04 5,586.88 0.0 5,586.88 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 206 - 366 -5020A 5,586.88 NOVEMBER SERI' Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee 6714 LAIDLAW B.P. REALTY ASSOCIATES, LL Ciaim# General Description 57632 QTRLY PAYMENT JULY -SEPT 30, 2003 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# 0 GL Distribution 226- 00A4245A --------------------- vend# Vendor Name 544 MANUEL L OZANO Bank Lhreck# Chk Date Check Amount Sep RA 012028 0/24104 25,218.00 invc Lit Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 01!29{04 25,218.00 0.00 25,218.00 Bross Amount iescription 25,218.00 QTR JLY -SEPT `03 Remit# Payee Claim# 6enez'al Description 5763; RDA MONTHLY MTG ALLWOWANCE JAN 04 P€1# Stat Contract# Invoice# 0 GL Dlstribution 201- 31A--5020A Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep RA 012029 01124/04 110.00 Invc [)t Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 01/29/04 110.00 0.00 110.00 Gross Amount Description 110.00 RDA MTG JAN 04 Warrant Register No. 593 Page 3 Vend# Vendor game Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 2765 MARLEN GARCIA RA 012030 01/29/04 110,00 Claim# General Description 57634 RIBA MONTHLY MTG ALLOWANCE JAN 04 PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount tiled Net Amount 0 01/29/04 110.00 0.00 110100 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 201- 31A -5010A 110,00 RDA MTG JA11 04 CCS.AP Accounts Payable Release 6.1.0 N*APR706 By SANDRA A (SANDRA) Vend# Vendor Name 3485 RICARDO PACHECO Claim# General Description 57635 RDA MONTHLY MTG ALLOWANCE JAN 04 PO4 Stat Contract# Invoice# 0 GL Distribution 201- 31A--5010A Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount 'yep RA 012031 01/29/04 110.00 Invc Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 01/29/04 110.00 0.00 110.00 Gross Amount Description 110.00 RDA MTG JAN % Vend# Vender dame Remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 3322 SDC PARTNERS, LTD RA 012032 01/29/04 306.00 Claim# General Description 57635 FEBRUARY RENT ffi# Stat E:sntract# Invoice# Invc Dt Gross Amount discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 1RENT 02/0 01/17/04 1.00 0.00 1.O0 1CAM 02/34 01/29/04 305.00 0.00 305.00 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description 206-•36A -5010A 306.00 FEB RENT Vend! Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank Check -9 Chk Date Check Amount Sep 7144 ALPHA FU14DING & REAL ESTATE ESCROW **VOID ** RA 012034* 02/03/4 30,750.00 Claim# General Description 57706 FIRST TIME HOMEBUYER FRANK CHI-Y1J YIP AND TJOEI -LIEN LIM 1720 PUENTE AV #41 * *ESCROW 180039 -5 ** PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Invc Dt 6ross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net AMount 0 02/03/04 30,750.00 0.00 30,750.1!0 GL Distribution Gross Amount Description �31-00A -5135A 30,750.00 F CHI -YU YIP IST TIME HO BUYER Warrant Register No. 593 Page 4 Vend# Vendo =, Game remit# Payee Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sers 7145 CALIFORNIA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY RA 012035 02 103104 24,200.00 Claim# General Description 57707 REFUND CHFA SUBORDINATE LOAN PROGRAM PAY-OFF MARIA MALDO NADO PO# Stat Contract# Invoice# Inve Dt Gross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 02103/04 24,200.00 0.00. 21,200.W GL Distribution Gr =oss Amount Description 281-00A -5160A 24,200.00 LOAN PRG FAY -FF M MALDONADO Vend# Vendor Name Remit# Payee Bank C€ -eck# Chk Date Check Amount Sep 3253 SAN GABRIEL VALLEY TRIBUNE RA 012036 02/03/04 266.22 Claim# General Description 57708 PUBLICATION AD #17244:1 PO4 Stat Contract# Invoice# 172441 GL Distribution 206- 36A -5010A Invc Dt Grass Amount 01/07/04 266.22 Gross Amount Description 266.22 AD# 172441 Vend# Vender Name Remit# Payee 7144 ALPHA FUNDING & REAL ESTATE ESCROW Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0.00 266.22 Bank Check# Chk Date Check Amount Sep RA 012038* 112/03/04 30,750.00 Claim# General Description 577W FIRST TIME HOMEBUYER FRANK CHI -YU YIP AND TJOEI -LIEN LIM 1720 PUENTE AV #41 * *ESrROW# 180039 -S ** PO# ;tat Contract# Invoice# Irvc Dt iiross Amount Discount Amt Discount Used Net Amount 0 02/03/04 30,750.00 0.00 30,750.00 GL Distribution Gr=oss Amount Description 281- OOA- 5135A 30,750.00 F CHI -YU YIP DEVELOPMENT AGENCY BALDWIN P A K, K vvsrsirfyfers s 1 %%- WL.YL.L.ii, IM A11 AGENCY AGENDA F E S -L (-UUI+ CONSENT CALENDAR TO: Honorable Chairman and Board Members FROM: Melecio Picazo, Interim Community Development Director -� DATE: February 18, 2004 SUBJECT: Adoption of a Resolution Consenting to a Joint Public Hearing on the Proposed Amendment 2004 to the Redevelopment Plan for the Central Business District Redevelopment Project Area and the Environmental Findings of the Negative Declaration Prepared in Connection Therewith PURPOSE: The purpose of this report is to obtain approval from the Agency Board to consent to a joint public hearing with the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park on the proposed Amendment 2004 to the Redevelopment Plan for the Central Business District Redevelopment Project Area (the "Amendment 2004 ") and the environmental findings of the Negative Declaration prepared in connection therewith. BACKGROUND: On September 4, 2002, the Agency approved a Consultant Services Agreement with GRC Associates, Inc. ( "GRC ") for the purpose of reestablishing the Agency's eminent domain authority over non - residential properties as it pertains to the Central Business District Redevelopment Project Area ( "CBD "). With CRC's assistance, staff determined the Agency's eminent domain authority in the CBD expired in 1994. Staff has met with Agency Counsel and GRC to initiate the plan amendment and GRC has begun the process. At its conclusion and provided that there is adequate public support and the Agency Board and City Council approve the Amendment 2004, the Agency will have regained eminent domain authority over non - residential properties for another 12 years in accordance with California Redevelopment Law (the "CRL ") time limits. On October 1, 2003, the Agency authorized GRC to proceed with Amendment 2004 to include eminent domain authority over non - residential parcels only. Accordingly, since residential property will not be subject to eminent domain, it was determined that a Project Area Committee would not be needed to provide input into the plan amendment process. On February 4, 2004, the Agency approved Resolution No. 387 which authorized the transmittal of the Draft Amendment 2004 to the Redevelopment Plan for the Central Business District Redevelopment Project Area to the Planning Commission for its report and recommendation with regard to the conformity of Amendment 2004 to the City's General Plan and making it available to the public for review. Page 2 of 3 Central Business District Redevelopment Plan Amendment February 18, 2004 Amendment 2004 is scheduled for review by the Planning Commission at its February 25, 2004 meeting. A community meeting for the property owners, residents and businesses within the CBD is scheduled for March 9, 2004 at 7:00 pm at the Community Center to discuss Amendment 2004 and to answer any questions from the community. Invitations to the community meeting will be mailed to each property owner, resident and business within the CBD this month. DISCUSSION: The CRL requires the Agency and the City Council to each hold a public hearing on any amendment to a redevelopment plan prior to taking any action on the amendment. As an alternative to separate public hearings, Section 33458 of the CRL states that the Agency and the City Council, with the consent of both, may hold a joint public hearing on a proposed amendment. Staff recommends that a Joint Public Hearing for Amendment 2004 be scheduled for the City Council meeting to be held on April 7, 2004. In compliance with Section 33452 of the CRL, a notice of the public hearing must be published pursuant to Section 6063 of the Government Code prior to the date of the hearing in a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City, or, if there is none, in a newspaper selected by the Agency. Section 6063 of the Government Code requires that the notice be published once a week for three successive weeks prior to the hearing. The notice of hearing for Amendment 2004 must include a) a legal description of the boundaries of the CBD by reference to the description recorded by the County Recorder when the Plan was originally approved and b) a general statement of the purpose of Amendment 2004. In addition, copies of the notice of public hearing published pursuant to Section 33452 of the CRL must be mailed by first -class mail to the last known property owner of each parcel of land within the boundaries of the CBD as shown on the last equalized assessment roll of the County of Los Angeles 30 days prior to the public hearing. Additionally, the Agency is required to make a good faith effort to mail copies of the notice to all residents and businesses within the CBD, by first -class mail and at least 30 days prior to the hearing. Finally, copies of the notice of public hearing must be mailed to the governing body of each of the taxing agencies that levies taxes upon any property in the CBD by certified mail with return receipt requested 30 days prior to the public hearing. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Redevelopment Agency Board waive further reading, read by title only and adopt Resolution No. 388 entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK CONSENTING TO A JOINT PUBLIC HEARING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AND THE BALDWIN PARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT 2004 TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS OF THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION PREPARED IN CONNECTION THEREWITH" Page 3 of 3 Central Business District Redevelopment Plan Amendment February 18, 2004 ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit "A" - Resolution No. 388 EXHIBIT "A" Resolution No. 338 RESOLUTION N0 3-. A RESOLUTION OF THE BALDWIN PARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CONSENTING TO A JOINT PUBLIC HEARING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AND THE BALDWIN PARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT 2004 TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS OF THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION PREPARED IN CONNECTION THEREWITH WHEREAS, the Baldwin Park Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency ") has initiated proceedings for the proposed amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for the Central Business District Redevelopment Project Area (referred to as "Amendment 2004 ") in compliance with the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code, sections 33000, et seq.) (the "Redevelopment Law "); and WHEREAS, the Agency and the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park must hold a joint public hearing for the purpose of considering the proposed Amendment 2004 and the Negative Declaration; and WHEREAS, Redevelopment Law Section 33452 requires that a notice of said public hearing be published in a newspaper of general circulation and be mailed to each property owner, resident, business and affected taxing agency. NOW, THEREFORE, THE BALDWIN PARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Agency hereby consents to a Joint Public Hearing with the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park on the proposed Amendment 2004 and the Environmental Findings of the Negative Declaration prepared in connection therewith at the following time and place: Date: April 7, 2004 Time: 7:00 p.m. Place: Baldwin Park City Hall, Council Chambers, 14403 East Pacific Avenue, Baldwin Park 2. The Secretary of the Agency is authorized and directed to give notice of such public hearing in the form and manner required by law. RDA Rescl..#^^ 388 Page 2 npprxQr,!!E "A Nn. AnppTn this 1 8th day of February 2nn4, MANUEL LOZANO CHAIR ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) SS. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ) i, Kathleen R. Sessman, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly approved and adopted by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Baldwin Park at its regular meeting held on February 18, 2004, by the following vote: AYES: MEMBERS: NOES: MEMBERS: ABSENT: MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: MEMBERS: KATHLEEN R. SESSMAN DEPUTY CITY CLERK JOSE SANCHEZ AGENCY SECRETARY � �m..v��reu cx ro�Ve- �IVL11Vv AUTHORITY AGENDA F LD 1 L�U14 UNAPPROVED/UNOFFICIAL ITEM NO COUNCIL CHAMBER JANUARY 21, 2004 14403 E. PACIFIC AVENUE WEDNESDAY BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 7:00 P.M. The HOUSING & FINANCE AUTHORITY of the City of Baldwin Park met in REGULAR SESSION at the above time and place. ROLL CALL Present: Member Marlen Garcia, David Olivas, Ricardo Pacheco, Vice - Chair Bill Van Cleave, and Chair Manuel Lozano Also Present: Dayle Keller, Executive Director; Stephanie Scher, Agency Attorney; Mark Kling, Chief of Police; Jose Sanchez, Finance Director; Shafique Naiyer, Public Works Director; Melecio Picazo, Interim Community Development Director; Manny Carrillo, Recreation and Community Services Director; Dolores Gonzalez - Hayes, Housing Director; Kathryn Tizcareno, City Clerk; Maria A. Contreras, City Treasurer; and Kathleen Sessman, Deputy City Clerk CONSENT CALENDAR APPROVED A motion was made to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. A -B as presented, and as follows: MOTION: Member Olivas SECOND: Member Pacheco Carried MINUTES The minutes of December 17, 2003, were approved as presented. HOUSING DEPARTMENT STATUS REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER Report was received and filed. COUNCIL I STAFF REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS ADJOURNMENT There being no other matters before the Agency, the meeting was adjourned at 9:15 p.m. Approved as presented by the Agency at their meeting held February 18, 2004. Kathleen R. Sessman Deputy City Clerk IRMI BAMWIN CITY OF RALDWIN PARK Housing & Finance Authority a �vva�olry uc o W%rMr%aIIM%7 AUTHORITY AGENDA FEB 1 8 400 STAFF ff UKT CONSENT CALENDAR P • A • R } K TO: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Housing Board FROM: Dolores Gonzalez- Hayes, Director of Housing DATE: February 18, 2044 SUBJECT: Housing Department Status Report for the Month of January 2004 PURPOSE To provide a status report on the Housing Department's: • Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME program activities and ■ Housing Authority's Section 8 and Public Housing Operations. DISCUSSION The following is a grief description of Housing Department activities and accomplishments for the month of January 2004: 1. CalHome Grant — On February 2, 2004, the City of Baldwin Park was awarded a grant in the amount of $500,000 from the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). Housing Director Gonzalez - Hayes, Housing Programs Coordinator Suzie Ruelas and Administrative Clerk 11 Nancy Garcia attended the awards presentation held at an affordable housing development in Van Nuys. Among those present were Los Angeles Mayor Hahn, new State Secretary of Transportation and Housing Sunne Wright McPeak and Los Angeles Councilmember Tony Cardenas The CalHome funding is a grant to the City to be used for the Residential Rehabilitation Loan Program. 2. Residential Rehabilitation Loan Program (RRP) — Housing Rehabilitation Specialist Jaime Sanchez continues to work in the De Anza neighborhood seeking potential candidates for the Rehabilitation Loan Program. Correcting code violations in that area is a top priority. Homeowners are provided with an opportunity to apply for a loan prior to Code Enforcement action. January activities include assistance to one senior citizen resident and her two adult handicapped children receiving a grant and a loan for substantial rehabilitation to their home including handicapped modifications to their bathroom. Monthly Status Report— Februlary 18, 2004 Page 2 RRP PmarpSg RPnort Table ( Period January 1. 2004 .. throu.ah January 31, 2004) . I Project Description . Qty Comment Est. Date of Com letion Substantial 3 � Approved ARP Projects Nth Rehabilitation Loans _I 35 I Under Construction and Lead Abatement Mid February Loans Repaid 2 2 Under Construction End of March Rehabilitation Grants 1 1 Handicapped modifications to bathroom Completed Loan Applications 16 Application Phase 2 Pending Loan Committee review 3 Mid February ■ 2 Pending bid submission " ■ 7 Pending Inspections /Work Write -ups " 5 initial applications in review process Grant Applications 1 I Pending Loan Approval " ■ New roof Loans Repaid 2 2 loans repaid $15,500 Program Income Generated ' Inquiries 14 Application Packages issued Pending Submittal Total Monthl Activit 33 3. First Time Homebuyers Program (FTHBP) -- Staff has been meeting with local banks and lenders to market the program and inform them of the new increased income limits. A First Time Homebuyer's Fair is scheduled for Saturday, March 13, 2404, 9 :00am- 12:00pm, at the Esther Snyder Community Center. Residents are invited to attend to receive information on City programs and meet with local lenders. An article will be published in the March issue of the NOW. The Baldwin Park Housing Department approved income) homebuyer for a City loan. With the a began the New Year in their three - bedroom cond Time Homebuyers' Program activities,. its first moderate - income (120% of median ,sistance of the FTHBP, a family of three )minium. The following represents the First FTHBP Pra ress ReiD3ort Table Period January 1, 2004 throe h January 31, 2004 Project Description . Qty Comment — Program Income Generated Loan A lications l Loan approved and .funded Nth Inquires _I 35 Telephone and walk -in. inquires from lenders and otential ho�nebu ers. NIA Loans Repaid 2 2 loans repaid $24,500 Total Monthly Activity, 38 _ _, Monthly Status Report— F=ebruary 18, 2004 Housing Authority (HA) Page 3 1. Housing Authority (HA) Activities —The following table provides a quantifiable number of accomplishments by the Housing Authority staff: LIA Dryivvnnn l7n"r,rf Tnhln 10nrinrl• lanrlani 'I 90(ld Mrnrrrrh .lanlrary 31- 2004) Project Description Qty. Comment Est. Date of 3 Work Order Requests Completed Orders: Total M nthly Activit Completion housing Choice Voucher 2 0 Reviewing families eligibility Completed Program- Section 8 Waiting 2 a Determined eligible List. 3,510- Applicants 14 HC Vouchers issued " 16 Briefing packets prepared " 4 ff Applicants withdrawn " I 262 Pre - applications entered into the system " 3 Portables entered into the system " PortabilitylBilling 19 Families transferred out of our jurisdiction Ongoing and Receiving PHA is billing our agency (BPHA earns administrative fees) Number of units Leased 711 Units under lease as of December 31, " 2003 (Lease-up rate fast nionth was 713) See. 8 Housing Unit 50 ■ Annual inspections Completed Inspections 54 ■ Annual Follow -ups " 15 ■ Initial inspections 7 ■ Initial Follow -ups 2 ■ Public Housing Inspections Annual Re- certifications 96 Re- certifications Completed Interim Re- certifications 16 ■ Increase in rent/decrease income People Transferred Out 2 Other HA's " People Ported In 7 ■ Outside of BPFI.A's jurisdiction Ongoing Housing Assistance 11 New Contracts " Payment Contracts 1 Termination o Assistance 7 Cancelled contracts Completed Moving 29 ■ Participants that are in the process of Ongoing naovin from one unit to another. Quality Control File Review 84 Tenant files reviewed for the Housing Ongoing Choice Voucher Pro ram. Total Monthl Activit 1,413 _ 2. McNeill Manor Public Housing, 12 -unit complex for seniors 62+ - The following table provides a number of monthly activities at the McNeill Manor senior complex. L!A 0—ivr Dannrf Tnhln [Morinri- tanrrary 1 fhrnrlrrh .1anllary 31 _ 2004} Project Descri Lion tv. Comment Est. Date of Completion E Maintenance Work 3 Work Order Requests Completed Orders: Total M nthly Activit i 3 W� Monthly -Status Report — February 98, 2004 Page 4 3. Rental Property Owner's Workshop — On February 18, 2004, the Baldwin Park Housing Department will be hosting its first "Rental Property Owners Workshop ". Landlords from the cities of Baldwin Park, Monrovia, West Covina, El Monte, and South El Monte have been invited to learn more about responsible property management and to market the City's housing programs. Experts in their respective fields will be making presentations on responsible property management, fair housing laws, evictions, tenant screening and more. 4. Joint Commission /CDBG Advisory Committee Meeting — On January 8, 2004, the Housing and Recreation and Community Services Commissions met as the Joint Commission /CDBG Advisory Committee. The Joint Commission was provided a Power Point presentation regarding the CDBG Annual Action Plan process. At the request of the Joint Commission, a meeting will be held on February 5, 2004 to provide the Joint Commission with the opportunity to review applications for funding prior to the oral presentations by the public service organization applicants. The actual presentations will take place on February 12, 2004, 5. Capital Fund Improvements — The McNeill Manor Public Housing apartments will be undergoing minor improvements. The improvements will include the upgrading and extension of the sidewalk in front of units G through L, and the painting of the metal doors to the utility rooms. Staff will be conducting a walk- through of the site to observe other necessary improvements needed. &. Public Housing Agency Plan (PHA Plan) —The Baldwin Park Housing Authority completed a draft of the FY 2004 -2005 PHA Plan. A Public Notice for the required 45 -day public comment period was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune on February 2, 2004. The PHA Plan is a comprehensive guide to PHA's policies, programs, operations, and strategies, for meeting local housing needs and goals. The PHA Plan also serves as the annual Capital Fund Program. The Capital Fund Program is a grant program by which the Baldwin Park Housing Authority receives funds from the Department of Housing and Urban Development for the capital improvements necessary to ensure the long -term physical viability of the public housing development known as McNeill Manor, a 12 -unit complex for senior citizens. 7. Staff Development — On January 28 -29, 2004, Director Dolores Gonzalez - Hayes, Interim Housing Programs Coordinator Patricia Guzman and Housing Inspector Liz Flores attended the Housing Authority Executive Directors Workshop hosted by the Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino at Big Bear Lake. Bill Thorson, Director of the Capital Fund program for HUD Washington DC gave a presentation and provided training on the Capital Fund program. Members from the Los Angeles HUD office were also present at the meeting. 8. Personnel — Congratulations to Housing Inspector Liz Flores for being one of the recipients for the "Above and Beyond the Call of Duty" awards presented at the Employee Reconciliation Dinner. ATTACHMENTS: January 8, 2004, Joint Commission /CDBG Advisory Committee Minutes. ATTACHMENT JOINT COMMISSIONICDBG ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES JANUARY 8, 2004 Meeting of the Joint Commission/CDBG Advisory Committee MINUTES January 8, 2004 The Regular Joint Meeting of the Baldwin Park Joint Commission /CDBG Advisory Committee was held on January 8, 2004, at the Esther Snyder Community Center, 4100 Baldwin Park Boulevard, Baldwin Park, CA 91706 Meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Members Present: Margarita Vargas, Oscar Marin, Ruth Davila, Rose Acosta, Ana Lujan, Martha Reyes, Greg E. Conde, Rita P. Vasquez, Cassandra Ortega, Ralph Galvan Members Absent: Sally Weck, Marisela Weil, Mario Ventura, Luis Lopez, Irma Tarango Others Present: Dolores Gonzalez- Hayes, Director of Housing, Manuel Carrillo, Director of Recreation and Community Services, Suzie Ruelas, Housing Programs Coordinator and Nancy Garcia, Administrative Clerk II, APPROVAL OF CERTIFICATE OF AGENDA POSTING FOR January 8 2004 A motion was made to approve the Certificate of Posting for January 8, 2004, MIS/C: LujanfVasquez Motion Carried APPROVAL OF MINUTES None UNFINISHED BU'SINESS-NONE None NEW BUSINESS a. Selection of Chairperson and Vice Chairperson A motion was made to approve Commissioner Reyes as Chairperson MIS/C: LujanfVasquez Motion Carried A motion was made to approve Commissioner Vargas as Vice Chairperson M1S /C: LujanfVasquez Motion Carried b. Overview of Community Development Block Grant Consolidated Plan Process .... ............................... Housing Programs Coordinator Ruelas presented the Commissioners with a powerpoint presentation of the Community Development Block Grant process. The following topics were covered: • The Housing Department functions include Housing Preservation, Neighborhood Revitalization, First Time Homebuyers and Rehabilitation Loan Programs, Public Housing, and Section 8 assistance. • Oversight of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnership (HOME) Funds and 20% Low - Income Housing Funds, including the creation of the CDBG 5 -Year Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan. • The importance of citizen input and participation through Joint Commission / CDBG Advisory Committee meetings. • Examples of programs funded with CDBG and HOME Funds such as street and sidewalk improvements, storm drain projects, construction of the Teen Center, First Time Homebuyer and Rehabilitation Programs, and Public Services Agencies Commissioner Vasquez inquired as to when the Housing Department begins research and identification of the goals and needs of the community. Housing Programs Coordinator Ruelas explained that this is an ongoing process with continuous communication with other departments, public agencies and residents. Commissioner Lujan inquired as to the level of achieved community participation in the development of the Annual Action Plan. Director of Housing Gonzalez -Hayes responded that the number of responses are few, hence the importance of the Commissioners participation as a voice and representatives of the Baldwin Park community. A motion was made to meet on February 5, 2004 at 5:30 p.m. to provide the Commission with the opportunity to review applications for funding prior to the oral presentations by the applicants. The actual presentations by public service agencies will take place on February 12, 2004. M /SIC: Vasquez /Conde Motion Moved. REPORTS OF OFFICERS MEMBERS COMMISSIONERS OR COMMITTEES Commissioner Vargas shared her experience at the Neighborhood Reinvestment conference in San Francisco. She was very proud to represent the City of Baldwin Park and the ability to share the many activities and programs the City offers. She learned many things about community organizing activities and is eager to utilize the knowledge she received. Commissioner Vargas also requested to have brochures made advertising the activities offered by the City of Baldwin Park. ORAL. COMMUNICATIONS -NONE The Joint Commission was provided with a flyer and information regarding the Employee Recognition Dinner scheduled for January 30, 2004. Bernie Dillion and Diane Case from Project SISTER provided a brief overview of the program and informed the Commission that they will be submitting an application for CDBG funding. ! *111I'.7i•1i•Il�f�lr A motion was made to adjourn the meeting. MIS/C: Vasquez /Lujan Motion Moved. Meeting was adjourned at 6:30 PM The foregoing minutes were approved as Joint Commission /CDBG Advisory Committee meeting of ATTEST: Nancy Garcia Chair Reyes Administrative Clerk II CDBG Advisory Committee at the ori , B_ALDWIN P A, R, K Baldwin Park Housing & Finance Agency nUU01NU �k 1- 11VANUINU AUTHORITY AGENDA FEB 1 8 2004 ITEM NO". A `" (' . STAFF REPORT Consent Calendar TO: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Ho n oar FROM: Dolores Gonzalez- Hayes, Director of Housing DATE: February 18, 2004 SUBJECT: Baldwin Park Housing Authority's Voucher Payment Standard Increase Purpose This report requests that the Baldwin Park Housing Authority Board, approve an increase effective March 1, 2004, to the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program's Payment Standard to 110% of current Fair Market Rents (FMR) as allowed by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Background According to HUD, housing authorities are required to establish housing rental payment standards for subsidized housing units by bedroom size reflecting approved FMR. The payment standard must fall within a HUD designated basic range. The basic range for Baldwin Park must be within 90% to 110% of the current Los Angeles -Long Beach Metropolitan Area's FMR. The latest change to the Baldwin Paris Housing Authority payment standard tools place in July 1, 2002. At that time the payment standard was set at 110% of the FMR for the year 2002. Analysis On October 1, 2003, HUD published the new 2004 Fair Market Rents for Baldwin Park's metropolitan area. Based on the newly released 2004 FMR (Please see Attachment 'W" and a survey of neighboring housing authorities conducted in November 2003 by the BPHA, it was revealed that this Housing Authority's payment standard was significantly below the area's housing authorities and the 2004 fair market rents approved by HUD. Specifically, of four neighboring housing authorities within the San Gabriel Valley area (Please see Attachment "B ") three are at 110% of current FMR. In comparing the current BPHA Payment Standard to 2004 FMR, this Baldwin Park Housing Authority's Payment Standard is at 88 %. Two important reasons for increasing the payment standard are: IN As housing costs continue to rise, families face greater challenges in locating clean and safe affordable housing within their economic means partially due to the below market rents allowable under the current BPHA payment standard. The proposed increase in payment standard will alleviate the housing cost challenge and provide families with a greater opportunity to access available housing in our area of jurisdiction. Secondly, by increasing the payment standard more rental property owners may be inclined to subscribe to the pool of owners already participating in the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program. Presently, the Baldwin Park Housing Authority's current lease -up rate is at 81%. HUD requires that housing authorities lease -up rate be at 95 %. HUD will sanction housing authorities that are not above the 95% lease —up rate by reducing monthly administrative fees until the requirement is met. To address the need for increasing the BPHA's lease -up rate, the upcoming "Landlords Breakfast Workshop" scheduled for February 18, 2904 will be a great opportunity to inform landlords of the new payment standard as an incentive to participate in the Section 8 program. Below is the current Payment and Proposed Payment Standards for the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program: 2004 Pronosed Payment Standard by Bedroom Size ._ ...... Bedroom Size Current Payment Standard (P$) 2004 Parr Morket Rent (FMR) Proposed Payment Standard (PS) At i19% Difference between current PS and Proposed __ _PS 0 $597 $674 $741 $144 1 $715 $807 $888 $173 2 $905 $1,021 $1,123 $218 3 $1,221 $1,378 $1,516 $295 4 $1,458 $1,646 $1,811 $353 Fiscal Impact There is no adverse fiscal impact to the Housing Authority. The increased amount is allowable and 100% reimbursable by HUD. In addition, by increasing the City's lease - up rate, the City administrative fees will increase accordingly. Page 2 Recommendation That the Housing Board approves the increase to the current Payment Standard to 110% of the federal Fair Market Rents making it effective March 1, 2004. Attachments: "A" 2004 HUD Approved Farr Market Rents "B" Survey of Payment Standard of Housing Authorities within the San Gabriel Valley Area Page 3 2004 HUD Approved Fair Market Rents Effective 10/1/2003 ATTACHMENT "A" EFFECTIVE 10/1/2003 SCHEDULE B — FAIR MARKET RENTS 2004 FOR EXISTING HOUSING CALIFORNIA METROPOLITAN FMR AREAS Los Angeles -- --Long Bead, CA PMSA O 13R 1 BR 2 BR 3 BR 4 BR $674 1 $807 $1,021 $1,378 $ 1,646 Survey of Payment Standard of Housing Authorities within the San Gabriel Valley Area ATTACHMENT 44B" SURVEY PAYMENT STANDARD FOR OTHER HOUSING AUTHORITIES IN THE SAN GABRIEL VALLEY AREA 1112003 Pomona Housing Authority Payment Standard is different depending on the area of the City of Pomona based on 90 %- 100 ° /n of the 2003 FMR Pasadena Housing Authority Payment Standard is different depending on the area of the city. East and Norwest of Pasadena- Payment Standard based on 110% of the 2003 FMR Linda Vista side of Pasadena- Pavment Standard based on 117% (Exception rent) U BX. 11 13K Z l- K j J. 4 iiit $702 $840 $1,064 $1,435 $1,714 Pico Rivera Housing Authority Pavment Standard based on 110% of the 2003 FMR 0 :89 1 $R 2 BR 3 BR 4 BR $575 -$702 $690 -$840 $870 -$1063 $1,175 -1,436 $1,402 - $1,714 Pasadena Housing Authority Payment Standard is different depending on the area of the city. East and Norwest of Pasadena- Payment Standard based on 110% of the 2003 FMR Linda Vista side of Pasadena- Pavment Standard based on 117% (Exception rent) U BX. 11 13K Z l- K j J. 4 iiit $702 $840 $1,064 $1,435 $1,714 Pico Rivera Housing Authority Pavment Standard based on 110% of the 2003 FMR 0 :89 1 $R 2 BR 3 BR 4 BR $701 1 $1,435 1$1,713 Los Angeles County Housing Authority Payment Standard based between 100 % - 110% of the 2003 FMR 0 BR I 1 13R 2.8k. 3 101(Z3R $701 $840 $1,063 $1,435 $1,713 $1,970 This survey was completed a month after the 2004 FMR schedule was released in the Federal Register. The likelihood of these housing agencies to increase their current payment standard to the 2004 FMR is very likely based on the survey conducted in 11/2003.