Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014 07 02NOTICE AND CALL OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO THE MEMBERS OF THE AFOREMENTIONED AGENCIES AND THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Special Meeting is hereby called to be held on WEDNESDAY, JULY 2, 2014 at 5.30 PM. at City Hall — 3rd Floor Conference Room 307, 14403 East Pacific Avenue, Baldwin Park, CA 91706. Said Special Meeting shall be for the purpose of conducting business in accordance with the attached Agenda. NO OTHER BUSINESS WILL BE DISCUSSED Dated: June 26, 2014 Manuel Lozano Mayor I, Alejandra Avila, City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, certify that I caused the aforementioned Notice and Call of a Special Meeting to be delivered via email (hard copy to follow) to each Member and e -mail to the San Gabriel Valley Tribune, and that I posted said notice as required by law on June 26, 2014. ,r Alejandra Avila City Clerk JeJA � I X7_1 CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING Please note tune and meeting JULY 27 2014 location 5:30 PM CITY HALL — 3rd Floor, Conference Room 347 14403 EAST PACIFIC AVENUE gALDWIN -Imri CA 91706 (626) 960 -4011 Manuel Lozano Ricardo Pacheco Cruz Baca Monica Garcia Susan Rubio - Mayor - Mayor Pro Tern - Councilmember - Councilmember - Councilmember PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES AND PAGERS WHILE MEETING IS IN PROCESS POR FAVOR DE APAGAR SUS TELEFONOS CEL ULARES Y BEEPERS DURANTE LA JUNTA PUBLIC COMMENTS COMENTARIOS DEL PUBLICO The public is encouraged to address the City Se invita al publico a dirigirse al Concilio o cualquiera Council or any of its Agencies listed on this otra de sus Agencias nombradas en esta agenda, agenda on any matter posted on the agenda or para hablar sobre cualquier asunto publicado en la on any other matter within its jurisdiction. If you agenda o cualquier tema que este bajo su jurisdiccion. wish to address the City Council or any of its Si usted desea la oportunidad de dirigirse al Concilio o Agencies, you may do so during the PUBLIC alguna de sus Agencias, pods hacerlo durante el COMMUNICATIONS period noted on the periodo de Comentarios del Pdblico (Public agenda. Each person is allowed three (3) Communications) anunciado en la agenda. A cada minutes speaking time. A Spanish- speaking persona se /e permite hablar por tres (3) minutos. Hay interpreter is available for your convenience. un interprete para su conveniencia. CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING — 5:30 P.M. Council ROLL CALL: • Monica Mayor Susan Rubio, Mayor Pro Tern Ricardo Pacheco and • r PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Three (3) minute speaking time limit Tres (3) minutos sera el limite para hablar THIS IS THE TIME SET ASIDE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL PLEASE NOTIFY THE CITY CLERK IF YOU REQUIRE THE SERVICES OF AN INTERPRETER No action tray be taken on a rnattei' uniess it is listed on the agenda, or uniess certain ernergency or special circumstances exist. The legislative body or its staff may: 1) Briefly respond to statements made or questions asked by persons; or 2) Direct staff to investigate and /or schedule matters for consideration at a future meeting. [Government Code §54954.2] ESTE ES EL PERIODO DESIGNADO PARA DIRIGIRSE AL CONCILIO FAVOR DE NOTIFICAR A LA SECRETARIA St REQUIERE LOS SERVICIOS DEL INTERPRETE No se podra tornar accion en alg(in asunto a rnenos que sea incluido en la agenda, o a menos que exista alguna emergencia o circunstancia especial. El cuerpo legislative y su personal podran: 1) Responder brevemente a declaraciones o preguntas hechas per personas, o 2) Dirigir personal a investigar y/o f1jar asuntos para tomar en consideracion en juntas proximas. [Codigo de Gobierno §54954.2] me�. -; 1. ADVISE CITY COUNCIL REGARDING NUMBER OF LIQUOR LICENSES IN THE CITI OF BALDWIN "A 2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION Pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9 Name of Case: Ava Delgado et al vs. Esteban Mora Ortega, Installed Building Products and City of Baldwin Park Case Number: BC 540331 Name of Case: Herrera v. City of Baldwin Park Case Number: BC 504909 3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9. Potential Case(s): one (1) REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION CERTIFICATION 1, Alejandra Avila, City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing agenda was posted on the City Hall bulletin board not less than 24 hours prior to the meeting on June 26, 2014. 'P" Aleian/dr'b` Avila City Clerk PLEASE NOTE: Copies of staff reports and supporting documentation pertaining to each item on this agenda are available for public viewing and inspection at City Hall, 2nd Floor Lobby Area or at the Los Angeles County Public Library in the City of Baldwin Park. For further information regarding agenda items, please contact the office of the City Clerk at (626) 813-5204 ore -mail rcqba1kro@1Lpldwy7 nk.,gotp, In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the Public Works Department or Risk Management at (626) 960-4011. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable staff to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. (28 CFR 34,102,104 ADA TITLE //) Oki A JULY 212014 7:00 PM COUNCIL CHAMBER 14403 • 1 960-4011 BALDWIN P A R K Manuell-ozano - Mayor Ricardo Pacheco - Mayor Pro Ter. Cruz Baca - Council Member Monica Garcia - Council Member Susan Rubio - Council Member PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES AND PAGERS WHILE MEETING IS IN PROCESS FOR FAVOR DE APAGAR SUS TELEFONOS CELULARES Y BEEPERS DURANTE LA JUNTA PUBLIC COMMENTS The public is encouraged to address the City Council or any of its Agencies listed on this agenda on any matter posted on the agenda or on any other matter within its jurisdiction. If you wish to address the City Council or any of its Agencies, you may do so during the PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS period noted on the agenda. Each person is allowed three (3) minutes speaking time. A Spanish speaking interpreter is available for your convenience. COMENTARIOS DEL PUBLICO Se invita al publico a dirigirse al Concilio o cualquiera otra de sus Agencias nombradas en esta agenda, para hablar sobre cualquier asunto publicado en la agenda o cualquier tema que este bajo su jurisdiccion. Si usted desea la oportunidad de dirigirse al Concilio o alguna de sus Agencias, pods hacerlo durante el periodo de Comentarios del Publico (Public Communications) anunciado en la agenda. A cada persona se le permite hablar por tres (3) minutos. Hay un interprete para su conveniencia. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING — 7:00 PM INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL Council Members: Cruz Baca, Monica Garcia, Susan Rubio, Mayor Pro Tern Ricardo Pacheco and Mayor Manuel Lozano - 0 This is to announce, as required by Government Code section 54954,3, members of the City Council are also members of the Board of Directors of the Housing Authority and Finance Authority, which are concurrently convening with the City Council this evening and each Council Member is paid an additional stipend of $30 for attending the Housing Authority meeting and $50 for attending the Finance Authority meeting. PROCLAMATIONS, COMMENDATIONS & PRESENTATIONS • CERTIFICATE RECOGNITION FOR YEARS OF SERVICE TO OUTGOING COMMISSIONERS • OATH OF OFFICE FOR NEW COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Three (3) minute speaking time limit Tres (3) minutos sera el limite para hablar THIS IS THE TIME SET ASIDE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL PLEASE NOTIFY THE CITY CLERK IF YOU REQUIRE THE SERVICES OF AN INTERPRETER No action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances exist. The legislative body or its staff may: 1) Briefly respond to statements made or questions asked by persons; or 2) Direct staff to investigate and /or schedule matters for consideration at a future meeting. [Government Code §54954.2] ESTE ES EL PERIODO DESIGNADO PARA DIRIGIRSE AL CONCILIO FAVOR DE NOTIFICAR A LA SECRETARIA SI REQUIERE LOS SERVICIOS DEL INTERPRETE No se podra tome acci6n en alg6n asunto a menos que sea incluido en la agenda, o a menas que exista algOna emergencia o circunstancia especial. El cuerpo legislativo y su personal podran: 1) Responder brevemente a declaraci6nes o preguntas hechas por personas; - o 2) Dirigir personal a investigar y10 filar asuntos para tomar en consideraci6n en juntas proximas, [Codigo de Gobierno §54954.2] City Council Agenda — JULY 2, 2014 Page 2 CONSENT CALENDAR All items listed are considered to be routine business by the City Council and will be approved with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a City Councilmember so requests, in which case, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. 1. WARRANTS AND DEMANDS Staff recommends City Council ratify the attached Warrants and Demands Register. 2. CLAIM REJECTION Staff recommends City Council reject the claim of Vijay Singhal, Leticia Lara, Danteandre Villa, Raul Ruballos and direct staff to send the appropriate notice of rejection to claimants. 3. APPROVE MOU WITH MTA TO RECEIVE NTD REPORTING FUNDS It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached MOU with the Los Angeles County MTA and authorize the Mayor to execute said agreement. 4. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 2014 -026, MODIFYING THE PART =TIME HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE TO COMPLY WITH STATE MINIMUM WAGE INCREASES It is recommended that City Council adopt Resolution No. 2016 -026, a Resolution revising Resolution No. 2008 -005 modifying the part -time hourly rates and establishing a range schedule. 5. ANIMAL CONTROL AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Staff recommends the City Council approve the Agreement with the County of Los Angeles, Department of Animal Care and Control. SET MATTERS - PUBLIC HEARINGS (7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard). If in the future you wish to challenge the following in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk and/or City Council at or prior to the public hearing. 6. PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -023, ORDERING THE ASSESSMENTS FOR THE CITYWIDE PARK MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR FY2014 -015 It is recommended that the City Council: Hold a Public Hearing, and after considering testimony, waive further reading, read by title only, and adopt Resolution No. 2014 -023 entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE CITYWIDE PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FY2014 -2015, AND AUTHORIZING THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY ASSESSOR TO ADD THIS SPECIAL ASSESSMENT TO THE PROPERTY TAX BILLS." 7. PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -024, ORDERING THE ASSESSMENTS FOR THE CITYWIDE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR FY2014 -015 It is recommended that the City Council: Hold a Public Hearing, and after considering testimony, waive further reading, read by title only, and adopt Resolution No. 2014 -024 entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH City Council Agenda — JULY 2, 2014 Page 3 CITYWIDE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR FY2014- 2015, AND AUTHORIZING THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY ASSESSOR TO ADD THIS SPECIAL ASSESSMENT TO THE PROPERTY TAX BILLS." 8. ADOPTION OF THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014/2015 FOR THE CITY, FINANCING AUTHORITY, HOUSING AUTHORITY AND SUCCESSOR AGENCY That the Mayor and City Council approve the City, respective Agency and Authority Budgets for Fiscal Year 2014/15 by adopting City Resolution 2014-025, Financing Authority Resolution No. 2014-002, Housing Authority Resolution No. 2014-003 and Successor Agency Resolution No. 2014-003. CITY COUNCIL ACTING AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION SET MATTERS - PUBLIC HEARINGS (7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard). If in the future you wish to challenge the following in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk and/or City Council at or prior to the public hearing. 1. APPROVAL OF ADOPTION OF THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014/2015 FOR THE CITY, FINANCING AUTHORITY, HOUSING AUTHORITY AND SUCCESSOR AGENCY That the Mayor and City Council approve the City, respective Agency and Authority Budgets for Fiscal Year 2014/15 by adopting City Resolution 2014-025, Financing Authority Resolution No. 2014-002, Housing Authority Resolution No. 2014-003 and Successor Agency Resolution No. 2014-003. CITY COUNCIL / CITY CLERK I CITY TREASURER / STAFF REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS None. City Council Agenda — JULY 2, 2014 Page 4 CERTIFICATION /. Alej@Ddra Avila' City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park hereby certify under pRD8hn of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing agenda was posted on the City Hall bulletin board not less than 72 hOU[S prior to the meeting. Dated this 26 "' day of June 2014. ie r /\l jaDd[G/\Vi/a City Clerk PLEASE NOTE: Copies of staff reports and supporting documentation pertaining to each item on this agenda are available for public viewing and inspection at City Hall, 2 nd Floor Lobby Area or at the Los Angeles County Public Library in the City of Baldwin Park. For further information regarding agenda itoms, please contact the office of the City Clerk at (626) 813-52O4orvia e-mail at rcaballeroQbaldwi in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, J you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the Public Works Department or Rink Management at (}28) 800-4011. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable staff to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. (28CFR34.1021O4ADA TITLE ||) City Council Agenda — JULY 2, 2014 Page 5 SUBJECT: Warrants and Demands SUMMARY Attached is the Warrants and Demands Register for the City of Baldwin Park to be ratified by the City Council. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council ratify the attached Warrants and Demands Register. FISCAL IMPACT The payroll for the last period was $371,450.95 and the attached General Warrants Register were $991,838.04 for a total amount of $1,363,288.99. LEGAL REVIEW None Required f.ETf1: 0 11111►`I C The attached Claims and Demands report format meets the required information as set out in the California Government Code. Staff has reviewed the requests for expenditures for the appropriate budgetary approval and for the authorization from the department head or its designee. Pursuant to Section 37208 of the California Government Code, the Chief Executive Officer or their designee does hereby certify to the accuracy of the demands hereinafter referred payments released since the previous City Council meeting and the following is a summary of the payment released: Warrants and Demands Page 2 1. The payroll of the City of Baldwin Park consisting of check numbers 196275- 196296. Additionally, Automated Clearing House (ACH) Payroll deposits were made on behalf of City Employees from control number 235565- 235806 for the period of May 11, 2014 through May 24, 2014 inclusive; These are presented and hereby ratified in the amount of $371,450.95. 2. General Warrants, including check numbers 200632 to 200827, in the total amount of $991;838.04 constituting of claims and demands against the City of Baldwin Park, are herewith presented to the City Council as required by law, and the same hereby ratified. j. M�m i 4 0 a got cgs I I CA Kau` iPS z 1AW11151115 jawn-mv. Wgmmsox 0 OVERRUN& ON 05 9 A 0 CV i mo m Wm 0 RE BA40"Jua IOWA" I HIM I QO00 P Ono QQ 300 0 88888 0 111101111rol MOP M20& "M ... HMO" low 0== 0 no gy-gy 9 1 A q 1 112 A 1� Rm yy sk kfitfil 'TiTTO mo woo .0000 "" NNNANNY &it mf�jt QWW%vQvW KO 00 0ii,141510 001 =00 ii Q I "ViOM A�toll Pit I --j. .. " N". no i3 NbA art S Stiff P9 7 Ait ills 44 mmot- SIZI I* WAV, AS RB A 02 RIM t 114 7T7" m 0 W O N Io 0 "woo bi mm 14 w WAR 0 wo=, %Q Known K0 92 MIX V� M&NAM . 9� T� Amsn Si M m W a .,;- Fps RATIMMAI"" a, Aws % A ...... . Ab "k Q ... in et "4;1 - ' MAMA& hif-W&KY; v 'A 21 9 12� so ASE tie V4 10 111 �4 0 1,111 110 Wl rl 11 11-1 r- C4 -w a, C) 0 0% el- r" IM 0 m4 V1 10 il ID �v r, w f, o Ip �4 M cc 0 17� 0,.gM —4 �7 0 v ,�I -4 UE v a, 17, IN v M 00 w %P V, 1^ 4 "* - "I "i - � di t IN 4 �4 In In 'I _n 1a1 apt In In �, irt ra aa. 0, I P4 z DI w GU Tt. III Ra U, rk E 0000000 xxxlx -am a w P. 0, ti � t 4 XW3 3 M 9 v f x I 0� �4 At, 0. flu 0 C,2 R "k a. z �-4 14 P. 00 M 2 .O"y I - 1963 C4 CI owmv 8 IN vq "4 'N f`4 M N r4 N N M N +N N N N N N e'14 M 04 M C, cep 0000 0 lc� C�I CI 0 a 0 lz� C.P C-1 c 0 0 0 1-,- 000 C� 0 41�1 0 2, 0 " 0 t) C5, 0 0 a M :, 4> <� <> 4, 11 C) cl� C� c eo x 4 0 M iz � C� C�l M PO 00001D 0 C, C;> �7I co 0 0 olalooln, s� I-- ap I w ol s W Rai 1 1 Q i 9 1 4 1 1 In I 10 0 0 00 Q "'o O"i, co VI' 'ck "I 14%z, 4=, C rI,, C� 0 0 0 M WCI00 "t, c:,, w - 4p - - '. - a s . - r 4 - ¢ -,4 - 0 � 01 ra r- a"A 0 Ct fl� M, I� �4 �4 � �- ro 14 -111 0 r" VI In eI V o 4, ,1 .1 IrI In In VI 41 In C4 N C4 4p 0 �4, P N e4 T4 A Ip It 10 Ip v lz� 10 �p Z w a w 14 14 V In 4n w `4 4 0 1 1 �4 � 0 1 tI tt 0 c 10 0 C�� cp? Co "COO 't".0 C"o 0 0 11.1NO "0 0 0 ID 0 C, C� %a o oNow ka I& I;? Iv q> V5 by Iaw k,Y In sib OM CIO 010 C, M al In 1-4 A IS 114 1 r4NINNN �114�� -1 Q Oft 1.000 w 0 0 a 0 ID 0 0000 00 W V� M �n WI In Do Io e,:* v N. kftn 0. It, 1 0", O�� 0110 0 - I I I - I N fq N a,* 0.0 0 N ft IV effit C,4 r, w �r> 0 Qoq4,� 4 0 N �p n "D In a 8n w r, M MZZ M *4 w f"t, 1� Ct ll'� 1 1� 1� 0 1&t: IC N ON M10 ffN la �4 UI 1- 1-111 �4 111 &5 M 0 r=8 r^8 M �ffi 4D 4 -q M M �l � cq "'7' �4 On �4 4, p tf v w 0 N 14 M N "- IPI 44,4 U1, -.7 VY 4 �4 vl- r. ""I-* M W-.4 .4 Y4 Q 101 IV v I'D a CP 0 0 0 0 lr4 lu ;11 L3 e Wt to el m oa ON W "0 to 10 14 4 at U't el Pd Fea 14 Q to rt to 4o ch C4 t V to Ct ,-n 0000 14 0 0 00 00 �n 0 0001A 110 C� C� 10 �ft W, 000lm At o cc 1-4 14 'a to 0 t , t t m v't 0 <> v C T C N moo 0 at m 0- Q tn � 0 43 0 C, 0 e't ) ct w Q f, 0 f" o t- 10 "fm w 0 0 0 0,0 0 I 'N 0 g� ,n m w4 m M, " " - In 13 M 0 r 4 0,)i 0 m tilt In In tn %M 60 lh ko W" Ln tf? UN ID ev e4 �a in &I w w t4 �r, wt 10 tet I I., 14 -- 1— 1-t 0 -110 - 1 0 -, 5 Q lo w th 0 fn 0 tA C>,& :p tn :n Ln p W, 0 'o 0 0 "1 ir, ovR 0 .'3 tdii .4 t 14 0 .4 2 1 �q I "I I �4 f -4 t 4 4o 10 Q 0 �o -4 10 A^ 10 1000 W 'a � �o w rl,> wl 17 1,411.1 t& ull w X — 0 tv C-4 -19P 10 0 r4 1-1� " ;_, 0- 01,414 C, r� p 0 0 "It, f, i^ � H ate. 1 4n 10 C> V% w � Vi ko 0 VR cot C, tn 10 C7 0 10 at 0 to � 2n v 0 110 %p C, 23 W is Nils I z A so p x W Not u I M OZ ug A2 Q 34 R* UNA& 51051" TOM iC OT .41 Now As g. AA tt ow at rings Is i fig 000 0 0 w 0 0= O"QQ"o""> wwo obo' V, 0 r- MM 0 M w M Q 00 000000 oc� 00 0,00000"o 000 a 0 0 "0 0 - 9910Q00Q0wwZ4 ow 0 C�l a°w 0.11 -1 v 'T F +.i' F T'.i' T T H l A H SH H SUN NN 3532142121121 N z u 3111 u 11 11 al Sal in as 162MASQ, s"TM7 41 L1 I 14 w Ex 0 xS Zd I V. mom 0 -4 � NN a, w 4 r4 0 C> C� IV �n w w in 71 17, 4 k apt 04>0 Nr4,N "4 V N N N Z HNNN 00 w W'V V V,�y �p V," .4 Irk z tN N cl I m (4 U. a ;-a '4 "a w 1-4 a x n at 4 t to i CV N, N ud Yak WWI C4 w IA 0 GI R 51 =00 a In, 02, 0 0 0 Cr S Cs,Z� t t 'a 0 1 1 1 1 N f14 14 4 1d «a W2 � " "4 * Q ILI C, 1=1 --4 -f -4 C, 0 0 14 10 iO 10 WA W� N In In scam} ca 91 17, lu� 4� rl v W m C"C; ri rmt �O un 4=� r' N eve (a r- W,2 0 N ire 7- ctil "TIN NN N"Mql�N E 4 9 t% F i b I i 000 C, 0 000 mo t� 0 013`1 C n IIC3 0 .q VR 4 kv "Pio {n Iz � Ln Af5 C, 0 0 0 oo a ka I'D 0 �n I,& kb al U'} 'D N N N eq 414 N m 1�4 ICI IT* 14 It, rq T, %0 w ul .4 e6 c7 00 m 00 ,00, IF all E, �4 Q� z 4 1.) W, 1% 40 MEE z 2 ut vi u C4 4 C, C. 0 -0 m V N 6m 0 LA .4m in IM im w 14 u" xms ma ra us M M, "'r X44 F„ 4P AO v- fk krt Z it s Now t ski III 1 9 v P W cost Ti n I C 000 MI! mmy = I* yqq it SO a 0 h I Sin 'gh'i 9H 1 M. &; sa Its Vol 4 R 2W 0 OU q 1h :W 4 U50 02 Zia 4 w tit as wow a <ou X" i �vs v5 ua us" d H-114 H Q VE -W -R -9 at 0 VIA G vii? won, M 11 M; 211 coo am an-W on" 5d E as racwea C3 K3 i`t MAP HS$t 9f5 Fa VMS Hit I t N loan MG ONAS"m WK mm mow I Ali W no 0 c" Sag Rif R ill i 11 *-.1 Im 0 a I §9 efik I ID eta %a 10 10 �4 rl rlt w �k 1* rl At I"n t f" En Bn Ira -1104 IeO4 lug 0 � 0 w 02 1417 U lc-,� 52 Or + Sit e1r Cat G3 2 2 z 5 2 lk SK m 94 0 a..3 H .0 Ul Iii a C� 0 0 0 ul� iV 4W s^s NO -M kCr u5 ICI 44 In 00 m4 1 �o C� 10 t- U-1 0 0— o 0 C, 10 d 14 w4 �4 1� '7 BfF 0 0 S -0 0 fzl V "oo zl C, �o �Q 0 Z 00 C� 14 JHS h 0, 2, 0 0 I I Ul &C 1,0 N M ID N W� M'D a, m A 40 4, &1,4 V),m _,� 0 N m N W, CS V$. W, �4 r 1�4 W V ",4*, 4 -4 .0, w V5, m or, M ,I s� VA " W% 0 Qh in 4&,4, � � un -4 4V� Lel W 0 C4 M V, kk K- cl m -4 f 0 C) 0 ca 101 0 0 0 0 C� C. 0 0 0 �71 M M Irq M M e7, N N 1-4 N Em 2, z 0, to I #n PsP Ca -4 14 T— 0 <V N17, N 0 6h W* 141t,4PI44#lt 'o 0 C-4 f-4 'q, if, ul3 A Lm V� U� In un 0 613 Vt I'm 0 Cl %a 1q, ot 0 ri & 11 H. 14 1* C� 0 M 0 *10 u4 Ln M M,7, 7, C, 0� M V, t7§ $: a, —74 m M 41 U) I'll OZ E� C, ozzz� uww D 0 a-P 0 0 L"* 'm Q'� 0, 0, 94 n C4 H�-"4 oz VW V" W, U. FU W M �L, P. M U. W D6 W D. 14 U 0 �4 J;�) K A X ft W C, 4 o C6 47, CP 0 0 4> 0 Z 000 0 14 0 CICA 15 0 1.5 Cn� Cr 0t"£ C3 Q a Q C� '2' oo�-Q <:Z Q Q 0 0 C;S Eva ft,4 N �4 � 4 �4 � � � -� 4 " 'I H 1-4 n �H 1�4 -�4 "t �- �4 1� �l 'o, - '* N 4m a� in �n 0 � 'n ul� �n wn in wi m ut Lnn it i & bg 1z, 00 OOQ 0 C, p 00 kv %P rN m f.) r) m m 4-� ell,� m m e� m iq V) ul el U-1 ull 0 %� Cn V� m �^ W� vle -it Ho �,gt� It 11 C� = fl- 0 4�,��, Ln'n V-- a 0 0 +n m N 4 14 1 4 t I k W� Lh J�, --. C4 �--o - �l H 4,44 1^ �0 C, w �w " w 0 �b m �n V) 0 ,, ,, ,, to, mlj�IAO of A v 'Q "I cQ L"} IM �D N Z) 0 N M rq KIQ . tl,2 m m 11C in vi ,0 un 0, rq Cl 0 �4 In M 14 M 1� 1� 1� 1� 1� 1� llh N r- M 0 00 *n V3. C4 0 VA,bb 0 IP 0 0 ra 0 10 IN IN C4 114 1� V4 CY ON 43 C°1 rF 4n ko Ln 1� C. C> U*� 0 0 C, C� Zo '%,? f.% 0 a r , g C i C) a c v 0 14 �4 0 1" m "1 0 M v, 0 Z, i« SeF 0 Z� 11 m Pp 10 ! v 4 t C4 06 t,4 ,v N <A cl, 4 9 '1 '0 aul 0 PF, Erk Q 1Q, 0 CP �? IV o tn syf 1.4 114 A 1-4 u rs Sq rq f 1-4 c I > cp s� C, Ul� LM I k Rl Quo CP 00 0 0 V-4 H mIN e� In m m IN W, 'A N 0 o �i t- kA 4� tA Ot If ka p Q woo 10, vl� a ull 4A A t� ,2 0 Q kp 0 140 6I2 4» �4 t- I'l 14D -7 4� 01 "1 N M V*�IM N 14M �n a' C� H ID 00 w 44 i'- f4 eq C-4 tog ua wx 31 4A f OW i v to No .01 It, 00 5^* 1 a SAM. M boo H O =4 TO - iga a 1p Aw so 0 M Squag AN AN Q .41 H hw & Ow w K ra 0 Q 010, I A 1 swal", no a tong" 9 Z lei A ..: T h I ''T .1 J: .0 .1 41 off A Sul il ma st aka c, ca X We sy i i oil to 1 253 8 8 8 ari 2 cz = &A SP i 3 sw ism 12 4=2 A fly Q Q 11 W ism A Funn 1 i Sd Eta 1i 10, jj ill 11 jR jj if !if jj [gulf-. 2w W Ix kd r I lInr- r, a 1: Mtn M^ PM a 4 t%--t-,,M �4r, w * V vp m m 17 t d`•S -w N m IN 1 � -4 1, 0 0, t- m � Ca � rv4�,,w �d I& "r T- "a AD w 17, tn H C� I'D vt m m m ON ko m lu� 14 441-4 w Ap v �D 70-ZOM69 HUM 920,98 99 699 999 98;1�1 98"� I MW g 2 R 2 R R R R 2 R RE 2 R 12 2 2 2 R R 2 R R R 2 2 2 R 4040 R 2 R 2 2 R x z Pi 4 P4 41" N a. 0, �1% A P. P, 6. V. la, 0, N M mt4 IN V4 eli f� 41N 'IN N " N 014 414 IN " " C4 ' < Ytl , kll,t, C, ocl, 0 0 0 0 0 C� 0 0 0 et� 0 tl 0 0 CP 0 L 0 0 00 m 0 02, 'r cp 0 0 o C3 C> o C�, a� 000 C? 4:� Q = cpptp �p q, 0 Ca 0 tP 00 C, 0 �� 0 <�� c:1, 4=1 �11 0 x Kam' 43 0 Q10 000 CICI 00 a 0 a 0000'o 010 00 0 0 lf� g 0 m r�, rl C-1c, a* 411� et, m C, la Q 0 C, 0 0 Q ID C;� t� 0 0 0 0 0- tab- -- 0 0 C, 0;-, �* - — -4 �4 �. - 1� - �. — I-IM - - - 4 - - - - 4 - -t -4 0 m e) -}Im M;" 1% It m m M - lll� m M m 1-15 llq m M m ell M m M', M , M 6-1 UN ul� kr, � i� 0 In In 06 in 0 "A of >m tn tn In in kn in tn � m W-A W',A 0 ''Pit Q u 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 ID, 0 ID Q 0 C, 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 otoc-t 0 c, 0 a 0 -4 N f� N,�-4 N"N N �,4, N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m " m N N 4 ID AC I'D 19, 10 1& w 1.0 %0 v a � 10 to v Lo iG v kA w %0 t-:> 4,4 c�, co C� 0 <z a C� 0,;:t 0 000 Z 00000 ut I'* kc• w �p 5# �p �a %0 vmo �o w +z w w w ,P,�p av v 10 w "0 ?.D 4., ,v �o so N �4 0 N NN N 44 N,-44 4 �4t,4 IN t"t r4;4 " 14 elt P4 N N N m " C41-4 N �A N 44 N a0 tits �n U> km 0 60 U�, V,s �n 'n 1^ un V) Vi 0 0 m ul Lm 0 W� 0 %P Lp, V� wl �m 40 �n Ilh to �n 'In V� 0 N C•4 r4l"I't m r,; P-7 f-Y 11 m N d14 " P-9 IQ cQ r, V; " " C4 N� C-4 "t N t"a c"I 4,4 eq em 4.4 C-4 r4 " rl N m f. v IWYMB c> �4 5€a m m 111'41 It C� 6n i vo� &I ev m 411, N �* W, 14), ht 1P, ON I + OEM omwow "R M-1 1 4 2 ham 91 12 gn vy 1 0 As 2 -to 3 got i d ! loll, to a AV Oct 21 to wg RU VQ 0, i= RI F plants is 0 is A#0 HIM h N as aR m u air 11 E Pam tl lei I 14 00 z 48222R2 I A 1 Z41 ifs MOO" Now& l'"to! MM 0"00 00&" Mwm" jig .000 I. Jig . I Not 0 M 0z Q x 0 so uwa Ease lossi cgs H" 9A H H R if °we AS sm gmmmm wa ="M it to in i In mom .1 MUSIMS AS .5333 M .1 .1 R} "i H NE! tif its N(5 fiVs ESL 01-w"HASH, im cases S! as ow"Yo MA 0 4 4 Mopq 114 Poll 3 1: 50 "1 'gifigh "jgg "Sam: inn ag i HER A m 4 m I ERE cis es yy hEi II I m all IN r Rj WWI, RAN OM -1 A Ise aS gim 112 Wyn of Aw 0 3 '031 OQ A zhj 70 "I -Z ah xx 1z 0 Y.20000" 114 litty'Ili MN" WNW NN"N N r ^i m NMN NMNQmMTm 0=00,000 000owsma ommoommo MM- w sXa �4 all ffil .1 S .. MH H d d ON 1 era. aASTt "it: "I "I off OUN 1 'M M MH it i �t iii 'sPb t i : --- • f,� ,,, O'm 'o-, ! ! ! 99p i8 f^a LT o. t 'lid o t is a 3 � � ck E A +� fd� 4°� ✓mom ♦€ t i.: t i k'Q t✓9 a"'i {i '+4Y /-t :s+ ". '+i a'I.' '.i �,s at RJ 4 I Pt 0.t9 tr, to 111 0 '�', # i�3 GF � :v •i3 FE:: "'-- �3 4 Cu . G.> €� tai Ct �4 tti a i.€e � :rC� g rr�Gascs f�i E5s a § c w t s s a I t€ tak tY ,a t *a a 117 3 8 to 5-4 �t a+'e � �+ +� � � :�E i c� t En� a toe 2 x a tit a �wE r; RI of i` fir3 6.. tv �a rw w ai r+ ac+ If ¢ aw cn zR nala sz c� e 'aT B� t rE A9 � *+•B d4& xuk m% ¢° -ffi 4"d �'4 :+} d �: wM- :^�A- °^^I m.9 .^i a�+. ,tea .«+P s-a 4"3 E'k Ci f'+? fi4 &'S 3�k >;°KY'. 6*7 E° -S! ins C$ 4 0 00 0 0 0 €7 0 lzl 0 G€ 0 0 ? 13 10 <I a s ✓- 0 Z rd +:-4 d-4 0 ,wt .-4 0 2, '3 0 : , O O t� &°8 ar"s'4ab '*.d '«# Ka T'• r 4 GI e'P. t C 0 m a nuF p 0.4 0 1' �? p p 0 0. C# C SZ, 0 � cg o' m c3 r+9 »4 «�t CX 14 »-4 0 CJ „4 c*a } # i I PJ$ II k 4 t 1 11 9 I t t 4 t I 16 i t m 7 9 1 F G t # Q i B CiP t 4 4i t c9 1 £"P SIG 4 B- 0 0 93'7 S� G3 � r3 0 0 S3 '{.Y Bai Ci . �.` 4`�3 �,S 45 �? � $,"✓ &" w`W 4 S"� ✓°'# C` � ` P O � � tPR w��4 �4 "4 2 � �".,,� vN +`# .max x-t .M +^i r�P ("! � e^f V d°i Cb �.? jp A$F 1iF �R Woo � ✓`k �1 !A7 O E`^ ' 1' �3- v°a ceF" 3 fl7 T 3% " M r P^!i .7 f6 V. `9s +7 $ @ I I,, e"'t e^4 and l l M" 5 wi 0 Ct ®^t it, C^, 'S"7 i rt"'6 t".7 ^l ? " ,' "" &I �" y "'I 5 4"s " " " irk ^e'a , °i x�*J i^4 c' 1 m t r rid aH 11 e", e-°� -M- �. 0 o m .-?. N in &4 ens n In N m "'b e,1 N a'N 9'4 N NN sa 4n 4% 4M ",I t+`I a/? S+s to In 141 H"s F,d f,t WWI 0 lea C)m� 00�C C,4aC°10C> 0rt �o d� v-t i ? # .w rat + = i7 +. .a r•2 e r+ti c� 0 � 00 � 0 � � Io I,* w to., v v q» —00 000000000 t 8 1% I t "P 5a1 +^W r^s &I m 14 m m +^I i'+C 1`-1 In PrT m m T M f°f eq m e E m f0? 6p tit 'moo "w i &'%, NO IIII Y "IT �. m M S5a In m 3 i ?-P } ! 8 i A t i I ce t 4 & I I I I i I 4-d I t a t 3 1 # 4 I d %7 4 em3 110 IPo ->? a, z+tl 4'3 r^d N n „s 10 q3 N aT9 aN O'D �z gad 0 0 0 °Cl = P8 £k' i� �• ¢ �z "-�, q:✓ - 0 '- a Ap a $$tell # e s c G> ei? t za i t Ca t'� ca �? V»` V, 0 V3 ON #ft , ¢a to s i- 0a 14 �a sb 0 f 0 �. r 0 � +.: s� °:. °.,� r, a ari �t '�' +s %� zas ,w tal ,t7 .•t e-a u8i: � 4�i ea i bi1. aF;.. �', s8i 24 t xe's �7"t ?� e-t w �« e-•€ R-4 e-t �a �:a t�k � .-t r-i s.� xw a # k # 5 i d C`^J G3 8:i 4 a`4 Ip Sp cC o o o 0 b� t:`"^ 4^$ 'tom 5"+7 V 3 V '7' �. "� �i CS a,"°t, '� 6g/ w' �' S� � Q 8�4 C� b� � � F w, 3"^ "'N' d`$ §'S t3 �" i4 '�= 0'4"*C ?o °'Vd CY w daft ups??0, t mwun 'n C," -w 'w I, W''4 I* It, rl r ip°- @!4 +8° !*'€ �+'"g Cd s� f t G" �8 '� ^ k '"� 'SF � +N 'd' '�° � �? roW P*t Ns #+'9 Cti u = ;v: F°a .W ^� P"• u'r c° f :. A P•5 + Y � r? �°- %� ^� t :'sF4 •#` t4? k°7 w*# 2'* :p#.i 4"` � +^Q a+# kf3 fie'% ,�x..:a -a .•d'; �? +i S*e '+al #.E`Y � .i:.4 e;°� Eis �-.a �k C.Y _ a +;�,.a ret �?°r at: t«t rez aM•• t� tit 4tid4"i t? I a i h 3 f i 5 3 is M ASV 1w L7 I I iJ &NNW ZEN Now w E Us was u OR MEE -Ell 1 -1 tacawr gas 1 H Ell fia TTY 11 Al d 1i 1; M A 11M jjjj 11H 1. ih'y q zgj zy ;q; v NSN; 0_�� 11 TH -all -2 - ???? L ch CK L K AS Ag ogggs A.. 1:0 1 1 ,mum = 0 so 0 19 to W, "I W4 "" WA Mi "a "In 014 wim mko 'i M. 1511 RE if ill H is if ill RE! RU SS ME if is i qqqa A in W I I N 0 W cost; Wq 51 N !pl- I m 14 -1 Ew w 49, w v. �,ft m � Q La v fi.7 8 N A AN A t y k n? rn C3 Cs Cv 0 m In 10 0 0 r� 0 10 I e 10, —6 0 Im I Lo� � 1, . W) ell^ t- 'Ir In �r 141 -D 2, C- to 001-1 r� 'to ul fq fq '44 W, 4,14 0 N W, N � �r "', * fl 7, m N ro r4 OD C4 0-4 014 ,4 V, 0 0 c, o 0 4T M�w 0 C, IPI 0 p fl -0 v 0 0 T " 0 0 0 P Z 0,4 *"0,. iTq's C3 'Y' C, ,%o 9p 4p 0 1�0 0 00 0 loo wo 10 C) w 0 woo -4 q, 0 2, A IN 0, m wi -001V v" 0 fmi ref 31,9 kn 14 v r�l m m m N V, 4*4n �4 in- a� U. �*N 4* �4 on wl� V. m V�," 44, �A V� �4 14 r vPS ci ca In b& to 01, 1= C, C> ££ 0 iA Ql e4 N Say e4 N N, C4 114 ICE, 'C!, I=rl i Fl 0 oll {Sr.. Z, M, m 14 -1 Ew w 49, w v. �,ft m � Q La v fi.7 8 N A AN A t y k n? rn C3 Cs Cv 0 m In 10 0 0 r� 0 10 I e 10, —6 0 Im I Lo� � 1, . W) ell^ t- 'Ir In �r 141 -D 2, C- to 001-1 r� 'to ul fq fq '44 W, 4,14 0 N W, N � �r "', * fl 7, m N ro r4 OD C4 0-4 014 ,4 V, 0 0 c, o 0 4T M�w 0 C, IPI 0 p fl -0 v 0 0 T " 0 0 0 P Z 0,4 *"0,. iTq's C3 'Y' C, ,%o 9p 4p 0 1�0 0 00 0 loo wo 10 C) w 0 woo -4 q, 0 2, A IN 0, m wi -001V v" 0 fmi ref 31,9 kn 14 v r�l m m m N V, 4*4n �4 in- a� U. �*N 4* �4 on wl� V. m V�," 44, �A V� �4 14 r vPS ci ca In b& to 01, 1= C, C> ££ 0 iA Ql e4 N Say e4 N N, C4 114 91— STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council ,.,-HUB OF FROM: Shama P. Curian, Human Resources Manager SAN, DATE: July 2, 2014 c 1 ' , 1, %, , .45 , VALLEY ,`�,.," SUBJECT: Claim Rejection ,sc IN A This report requests the City Council reject the Claims for Damages to person or property received for filing against the City of Baldwin Park. FISCAL IMPACT None. Staff recommends City Council reject the claim of Vijay Singhal, Leticia Lara, Danteandre Villa, Raul Ruballos and direct staff to send the appropriate notice of rejection to claimants. LEGAL REVIEW No legal review is necessary at this time. In order for the statute of limitations to begin on the claims received, it is necessary for the City Council to reject the claims by order of motion and that the claimants are sent written notification of said action. Attachments: Claims filed by: Lara, Leticia Ruballos, Raul Singhal, Vijay CITY OF BALD WIN PARK , CITY OF i3 A® a 4`1 HUMAN REq BALDWIN CLAIM FOR DAMAGES RE( TO PERSON OR PROPERTY INSTRUCTIONS 20lq JUN I 1. READ CLAIM THOROUGHLY. 2. FILL OUT CLAIM IN ITS ENTIRETY BY COMPLETING EACH SECTION. PROVIDE FULL DETAILS. 3. THIS FORM MUST BE SIGNED. 4. DELIVER OR MAIL TO: OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK, 14403 E. PACIFIC AVE., BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 WARNING • CLAIMS FOR DEATH, INJURY TO PERSON OR TO PERSONAL PROPERTY MUST BE FILED NOT LATER THAN 6 MONTHS AFTER THE OCCURRENCE. (GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 911.2 • ALL OTHER CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES MUST BE FILED NOT LATER THAN ONE YEAR AFTER THE OCCURRENCE. (GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 911.2) I DWiN PARK URCES DEPT. AN Clerk's Official Filing Stamp To: City of Baldwin Park 4. Claimant's Dat of Birth (if a minor) ne /a 1. Name of Claimant Leticia Lara 5. Claimant's Occupation Human Resources Manager 2. Home Address of Claimant 6. Home Telephone Number c/o Hadsell Stormer, 128 N. Fair Oaks Ave., Pasadena, CA 91103, n/a 3. Business Address of Claimant 1 7. Business Telephone Number c/o Hadsell Stormer, 128 N. Fair Oaks Ave., Pasadena, CA 911031 (626) 585-9600 8. Name and address to which you desire notices or communications to be sent regarding this claim: Anne Richardson, Hadsell Stormer Richardson & Renick, 128 N. Fair Oaks Ave., Pasadena, CA 91103 9. When did DAMAGE or INJURY occur? 10. Names of any City employees involved in INJURY or DAMAGE: Date,January 29, 2014Time: unknown Name Department If claim is for Equitable Indemnity, give date claimant Michael Taylor Chief of Police & Exec. Team Manager served with complaint: See Attachment "A" 11. Where did DAMAGE or INJURY occur? See Attachment "A" 12, Describe in detail how the DAMAGE or INJURY occurred. c ®o Attachn-Innf "A" 13. Were police or paramedics called? Yes ❑ No [4 14. If physician was visited due to injury, include date of first visit and physician's If yes, was a report filed? Yes ❑ No D( name, address and phone number: Donna Wong, Community Medical Group of Downey, If yes, what is the Report No? 10800 Paramount Blvd, Suite 402, Downey, CA 90241 14. Why do you claim the City of Baldwin Park is responsible? (Please be specific - Use additional sheet if necessary) See Attachment "A" 15. List damages incurred to date? Emotional distress and punitive damages, economic losses. 16. Total amount of claim to date: $ Basis for Computation: See Attachment "A" Limited Civil Case: [-] Yes [K No (State the amount of your claim if the total amount is $10,000 or less. If it is over $10,000 no dollar amount shall be stated, but you are required to state whether the claim would be a limited civil case (total amount of claim does not exceed $25,000).) 17. Total amount of prospective damages: $ Basis for Computation: See Attachment "A" 18. Witnesses to DAMAGE or INJURY: List all persons and addresses of persons known to have information: Name Robert Tafoga Address City Attorney, City of Baldwin Park — Phone Name See Attachment "A" Address Phone 19. Sign ure of Claimant or person filing on claimant's behalf; relationship to claimant and date: b certify (o of perjury under the laws of the state of California that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, Attorney Anne Richardson 16 r Sin Relationshi p to Claimant _Printed Name Date Note: tresentation OT a raise claim is a telonly (Penal Code Section 72) CC Form 1 (Rev 7/06) I T, V ,,, i,, ,, Ec,—q- ,, , 1i I I , ., Leticia Lara Attachment "A" to Tort Claim June 18, 2014 Claimant Leticia Lara, Human Resources Manager of the City of Baldwin Park, was terminated on January 29, 2014. Her termination violated many laws, including retaliation for complaining of illegal and discriminatory conduct, improper payments to City Council members, and having rebuffed the sexual advances of then- Captain Michael Taylor of the Police Department, and laws against discriminating against employees who have disabilities. On or about December 10, 2013, Captain Michael Taylor was given a joint appointment as Chief of Police and Executive Team Manager, after a change in the makeup of the City Council. After he came into a position of power over her, Ms. Lara's work environment changed drastically from that time until her termination on January 29, 2014. During her employment at Baldwin Park, Ms. Lara raised a number of concerns regarding conduct by the City that she believed was unethical or violated the law. For example, on December 18, 2013, two Latino Operations Supervisors were demoted back down I[0 their previous positions as Program Supervisors. Ms. Lara protested this action by the City which she believed to be discriminatory and not in good faith. In January, 2014, she complained orally and in writing to Chief Taylor about their demotions. Chief Taylor did not respond to the memo. On January 14, 2014, Ms. Lara sent an email regarding overpayments being made to City Council members. Over the course of the prior months, a Human Resources Analyst had determined that city council members were still being paid to attend meetings of the Redevelopment Agency, even after that Agency no longer was in existence and the meetings were no longer taking place. She reported the amounts of the overpayments to Community Development Manager Marc Castagnola and Finance Director Craig Graves., From her initial hiring in 2006 through 2007, Captain Michael Taylor made sexual advances toward Ms. Lara. Ms. Lara consistently refused his requests to go out drinking with him, and ignored his frequent comments about his former wives, his wild parties, and his personal life. After he was appointed Chief of Police and Executive Team Leader in 2013, Taylor made comments of an unprofessional sexual nature, such as loudly asking about a pretty young female intern, "Who is THAT?" and also commenting in a meeting that the City had been caught with its "chonees" (Spanish for panties) down. Both these comments upset Ms. Lara and reminded her of the prior sexually inappropriate comments he had made to her. In January 2014, Ms. Lara could feel the hostility toward her was mounting due to her opposition to, refusal to participate in, and raising complaints about discrimination, overpayments, and sexual conduct. She went to see a doctor who put her on temporary disability leave effective January 28, 2014. On January 29, 2014, the City Council terminated her and appointed her successor. Her termination was due to retaliation for having rebuffed Chief Taylor's advances and complaining about his sexual language; for complaining about discrimination against Hispanic employees, and for bringing the overpayments to City Council members to light. Moreover, her termination violated laws against discriminating on the basis of disability and failure to engage in the interactive process. As such, her termination constitutes a violation of numerous laws, including but not limited to, the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, Cal. Labor Code § 1102.5, California Family Medical Leave Act, California Constitutional right to free speech, intentional infliction of emotional distress, discrimination on the basis of disability, medical leave, race/ethnicity, and sex, and retaliation, and similar laws. Ms. Lara has suffered severe economic and emotional distress, as well as to her reputation, all in an amount to be determined by a jury but not less than $4 million, as well as punitive damages, attorneys' fees, costs, and interest. Any correspondence to Ms. Lara regarding this matter should be sent to the attention of Dan Stormer, Hads-1.1.1 -Stor.merl 1?ichardson Vel-lick, at 1128 N. Fair Oak- Ave., Pasadena, %-,LA -7 1 1 V-) S A 0 A CI I I (I'l N CITY OF BAL N PARK CITY ' F a HUMAN F BAL :RI ' PARK ESOURC ES. DEPT. 1. Name ORM/i- RECEIVED BALDWIN CLAIM FOR DAMAGES 6. �o -7 0 7 F1, X--1 TO PERSON OR PROPERTY 2014 J 2 PM 12'. 0 7 INSTRUCTIONS 9. When didQAMAQEpr INJJURY occur? 7" /S-,0 //`11 -W2 1. READ CLAIM THOROUGHLY. 2. FILL OUT CLAIM IN ITS ENTIRETY BY COMPLETING EACH SECTION. PROVIDE FULL DETAILS. Clark's Official 3. THIS FORM MUST BE SIGNED. Filing Stamp 4. DELIVER OR MAIL TO: OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK, 14403 E. PACIFIC AVE., BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 WARNING ® CLAIMS FOR DEATH, INJURY TO PERSON OR TO PERSONAL PROPERTY MUST BE FILED �--rlm QY occ bred, 12 Qgsgribein Qna h,n,Ai th,- h A GP UT NOT LATER THAN 6 MONTHS AFTER THE OCCURRENCE. (GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 911.2) If yes, was a report filed? Yes No ❑ naqie, address and phone number a�DeAm r1l 0�\fi�-I,�3VS' * ALL OTHER CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES MUST BE FILED NOT LATER THAN ONE YEAR AFTER THE 14, Wh d u claim the City of Baldwin Park is responsible? (Please be specific - Use additional sheet if necessary) Wee6- /- )` e--?1/7- A14-1 Alr-eAJAA/Ce 01::-1fZ9Tr& W OCCURRENCE. (GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 911.2) 16. Total amount of claim to date: $ 0 k)/� Basis for Computation: I-f&-121CAL To: City of Baldwin Park 4. CltryiYip 1 (if a minor) 1. Name ORM/i- 5. Clainiant's (5ccupation 21:"-Addi3sS of Qaiml�t-. ,A, V ie L A�H /0 6. �o -7 0 7 3. Business Address of Claimant 7. Business Telephone Number 8--Name and address to which x2mesire notices or communications to be sent r arding this claim: -7 L 7Re I / S e /�, 2- fal Z-I)SA, �j "Xef C1, 79/) d �o 9. When didQAMAQEpr INJJURY occur? 7" /S-,0 //`11 -W2 10. Nam6s of any City employees involved in INJUP�? or DAMAGE: Department 1 Time: Name If claim is for Equitable Indemnity, give date claimant served with complaint: 11. M9AE or INJ RY occur? M17"? - - 70 6 It Aebd,'A9D FetZ, 4W/- 12WA`9 �--rlm QY occ bred, 12 Qgsgribein Qna h,n,Ai th,- h A GP UT 13. Were police or paramedics called? YeSA No ❑ 14. If physician was visited due to injury, include date of first visit and physician's If yes, was a report filed? Yes No ❑ naqie, address and phone number a�DeAm r1l 0�\fi�-I,�3VS' If yes, what isthe Report No? 14, Wh d u claim the City of Baldwin Park is responsible? (Please be specific - Use additional sheet if necessary) Wee6- /- )` e--?1/7- A14-1 Alr-eAJAA/Ce 01::-1fZ9Tr& W 15. List damages incurred to date? 16. Total amount of claim to date: $ 0 k)/� Basis for Computation: I-f&-121CAL Limited Civil Case: ❑ Yes X No (State the amount of your claim if the total amount is $10,000 or less. If it is over $10,000 no dollar amount shall be stated, but you are required to state whether the claim would be a limited civil case (total amount of claim does not exceed $25,000).) —=-71— Ey 17. Total amount of prospective damages. $ 2.6-. 0 0 0 4- Basis for Computation: -L7V q qi-- fiv 18. Witnesses to DAMAGE or INJURY: List all persons and addresses of persons known to have information: 2 &he�/� Address Phone Name Name Address— Phone 19. Signature of Claimant or person filing on claimant's behalf; relationship to claimant and date: hereby certt,5, (or declare) under penalty ofpe jury under the laws of the state of California that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my' knowledge. -3011; / L Signature Relationship a ,'Iaimant Printed Name DatJ Note: Presentation of a false claim is a felony (Penal Code Section 72) CC; Form 1 (Rev I/Ub) 'IL)SF-RI-ISTtCityclek\;,dmini,-,t,,ti,,,VProccd,iles & FnrmstClaim Y.r D.—C— F —1! CCI R- 7.06.d- Fe RJ CITY OF BALDWIN PARK BALDWIN FOR DAMAGES K TO PERSON OR PROPERTY INSTRUCTIONS 1. READ CLAIM THOROUGHLY. 2. FILL OUT CLAIM IN ITS ENTIRETY BY COMPLETING EACH SECTION. PROVIDE FULL DETAILS. 3. THIS FORM MUST BE SIGNED. 4. DELIVER OR MAIL TO: OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK, 14403 E. PACIFIC AVE., BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 WARNING • CLAIMS FOR DEATH, INJURY TO PERSON OR TO PERSONAL PROPERTY MUST BE FILED NOT LATER THAN 6 MONTHS AFTER THE OCCURRENCE. (GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 911.2) • ALL OTHER CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES MUST BE FILED NOT LATER THAN ONE YEAR AFTER THE OCCURRENCE. (GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 911.2) To: City of Baldwin Park 4. Claimant's Date of Birth (if a minor) 1. Name of Claimant 5. Claimant's Occupation Vijay Singhal City Manager /CEO 2. Home Address of Claimant 6. Home Telephone Number Please See Attorneys' Address (Para. 8) 3. Business Address of Claimant 7. Business Telephone Number N/A Attorneys' Number: 213 - 805 -5301 8. Name and address to which you desire notices or communications to be sent regarding this claim: Genie Harrison Law Firm, 1111 South Grand Avenue, Suite 101, Los Angeles, CA 90015 9. When did DAMAGE or INJURY occur? 10. Names of any City employees involved in INJURY or DAMAGE: Date: December 10, 2013 Time: N/A Name Department If claim is for Equitable Indemnity, give date claimant Please See Attachment "A" served with complaint: N/A 11. Where did DAMAGE or INJURY occur? City of Baldwin Park, CA 12. Describe in detail how the DAMAGE or INJURY occurred. Please See Attachment "A" and investigation Continuing 13. Were police or paramedics called? Yes ❑ No ❑✓ 14. If physician was visited due to injury, include date of first visit and physician's If yes, was a report filed? Yes ❑ No name, address and phone number: If yes, what is the Report No? ❑ N/A 14. Why do you claim the City of Baldwin Park is responsible? (Please be specific — Use additional sheet if necessary) Please See Attachment "A" and Investigation Continuing 15. List damages incurred to date? Please See Attachment "A" and Investigation Continuing 16. Total amount of claim to date: $ Basis for Computation: Limited Civil Case: ❑ Yes [✓ No (State the amount of your claim if the total amount is $10,000 or less. If it is over $10,000 no dollar amount shall be stated, but you are required to state whether the claim would be a limited civil case (total amount of claim does not exceed $25,000).) 17. Total amount of prospective damages: $ Basis for Computation: 18. Witnesses to DAMAGE or INJURY: List all persons and addresses of persons known to have information: Name Please See Attachment "A" Address Phone Name and Investigation Continuing Address Phone 19. Signature of Claimant or person filing on claimant's behalf; relationship to claimant and date: ! hefe rOy (ofdecYare) under penalty of pe jury under the laws of the state of California that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. ,r tl f Attorney Genie Harrisonp Si na re Relationship to Claimant Printed Name Date Note: Presentation of a false claim is a felony (Penal Code Section 72) CC Form 1 (Rev 7/06) i�961EE�iLt ST! Gliycied� A4dmt�iLtra:iou�Procedw�, � F= �a�nrc',CiaPSei for Ja;n:���±; Furo-n CCi {iflv %,D &_doc ATTACHMENT "A" CLAIM FOR DAMAGES TO VIJAY SINGHAL AGAINST THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK Vijay Singhal states the basis for his claims, on information and belief, as follows: Mr. Singhal asserts claims based upon Violations of the Brown Act, Retaliation, Breach of Contract, Violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Defamation, and Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, against the City of Baldwin Park, Cruz Baca, Ricardo Pacheco and Susan Rubio. 1. Vijay Singhal began working for the City of Baldwin Park ("the City") as its Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") in or about June of 2005, pursuant to a written contract. 1 Mr. Singhal remained employed by the City in the capacity of CEO until his wrongful termination on December 10, 2013. 2. As CEO of the City, Mr. Singhal had a wide range of duties and was generally responsible for managing, directing and monitoring the proper administration of the City, including its finances, pursuant to the powers as outlined in Section 31.03 of the City ofBaldwin Park Code of Ordinances. 3. Mr. Singhal was the longest-serving CEO of the City, with a stellar performance record. At the time he began his position as CEO, the City was almost financially broke. Despite an unprecedented recession to the economy, with a tremendous amount of hard work and effort, Mr. Singhal successfully led the City to financial stability and transformed it into a highly efficient organization. Mr. Singhal is a diligent and ethical worker who was strongly loyal to and passionate in his support of the City. 4. Unfortunately, Mr. Singhal's career with the City was cut short when he was terminated in an unethical and retaliatory manner, absent the proper procedures and in violation of applicable laws and his Employment Agreement. The circumstances surrounding Mr. Singhal's removal, as outlined below, demonstrate retaliation, the failure to follow procedures as governed by municipal and state laws, a breach of Mr. Singhal's contract and defamatory statements. Moreover, the City's public misrepresentation of Mr. Singhal as being "terminated" or "fired" was defamatory and contrary to his contract, which provided for a six month paid "leave of absence" prior to termination in the absence of malfeasance. This unlawful termination, breach of contract and misrepresentation has rendered it difficult for Mr. Singhal to obtain other employment, among other impacts. 5. As CEO of the City, Mr. Singhal had a duty to ensure that the City's operations ran smoothly, ethically and efficiently, within the parameters of the applicable laws, policies and procedures, and to use the most cost effective means available. Mr. Singhal was obligated to protect the City's interests, and was tasked with ensuring that the Baldwin Park City Council (the "City Council") was making informed, rational and legally sound decisions. As part of his job duties, Mr. Singhal guided the City Council toward courses of action that were appropriate, lawful and ethical. Mr. Singhal's job duties included attending all the open and closed session meetings, and providing advice to the City Council so the council members could make informed votes on matters. 1 Mr. Singhal has been a long-term public employee within the CalPERS system since approximately 1995. ATTACHMENT "A" CLAIM FOR DAMAGES TO VIJAY SINGHAL AGAINST THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK 6. City Council members Ricardo Pacheco and Susan Rubio in particular were not pleased with Mr. Singhal for his actions in representing the City's best interest. Many times Mr. Singhal refused to provide favors and concessions to the individuals and organizations that financially supported Mr. Pacheco and/or Ms. Rubio, or with whom Mr. Pacheco and/or Ms. Rubio otherwise had personal or familial relationships. 7. Some of the incidents leading to the retaliatory and unethical treatment of Mr. Singhal by Mr. Pacheco and/or Ms. Rubio are outlined below (please note this is not an exhaustive list): a. In 2008, Lili Hadsell was appointed as the City's Chief of Police, instead of Mike Taylor. Mr. Taylor was very close friends with Mr. Pacheco. Mr. Pacheco was disappointed that Ms. Hadsell gained the position instead of Mr. Taylor, and in 2009 Mr, Pacheco asked Ms. Hadsell to resign. On or about May 9, 2009, Ms. Hadsell told Mr. Singhal that she felt that Mr. Pacheco was treating her unprofessionally and in a harassing manner. Mr. Singhal reported the matter to the City Council, which, on or about June 3, 2009, then instructed Mr. Singhal to conduct an investigation and hire an attorney. The attorney's investigation and report identified that Mr. Pacheco had a tendency to bully employees, and on or about October 7, 2009, Mr. Pacheco was censored and reprimanded in public session, which resulted in him being angry with Mr. Singhal. b. In or about 2009, DC Corporation, a private developer that performed construction in the City, asked for the City to defer certain permit and other fees pertaining to their housing development when the economy was in a recession. The City agreed but when DC Corporation completed a project in or about 2012, DC Corporation refused to reimburse the City. Instead, DC Corporation wanted certain additional concessions. Mr. Singhal told them that they had a contract that they must honor. Ultimately, the City had to threat legal action against DC Corporation to recover the money that was owed. DC Corporation also wanted the City to donate land for another project. After consultation with the City attorney, Mr. Singhal advised the City Council and DC Corporation that the City could not donate land because it would be an unlawful gift of public funds. DC Corporation is a major contributor to Ms. Rubio's campaign and she expressed concerns to Mr. Singhal about how he was dealing with their demands and their failure to make payments. c. In or about May 2010, the City needed to hire engineering firms to perform the functions of construction managers for two street improvement projects. Mr. Pacheco pressured Mr. Singhal to hire Sid Mousavi's firm as construction manager, instead of going through the bid process. Mr. Singhal refused to accede to Mr. Pacheco's demand to violate the law. After a comprehensive process city staff recommended to the Council two consulting firms to act as construction managers. However, since Mr. Pacheco's friend was not recommended by city staff, he delayed the approval of the recommended firms and asked the Council to form a Council committee to re-evaluate the selection process. Pursuant to Mr. Pacheco's request, Council appointed Council Members Susan Rubio and Monica Garcia to the Committee. However, Council member Monica Garcia refused to be on the Committee. Knowing the outcome of the process Mr. Singhal refused to participate in the revised process. Ms. Rubio worked with the Public Works Director Mr. William Galve'z to change staff recommendations and to appoint Sid Page 2 of I I ATTACHMENT "A" CLAIM FOR DAMAGES TO VIJAY SINGHAL AGAINST THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK Mousavi's firm and Del Terra as the two construction managers. Mr. Singhal could not condone such blatant disregard of the process orchestrated by Mr. Pacheco and Rubio and refused to sign the staff report. Both Mr. Pacheco and Ms. Rubio were very upset with Mr. Singhal. d. In or about November 2011, Mr. Pacheco asked that an individual named Jesus Seinz be hired as a paid intern. Mr. Singhal told Mr. Pacheco that there was no available funding or provision for such a position, and that there was a mandated process to follow prior to allocating such funding and filling employment positions. Mr. Pacheco was clearly frustrated with Mr. Singhal because he insisted that favoritism was not allowed and that, instead, the law had to be followed. e. In 2011; Mr. Pacheco wanted the City Council to approve a zoning change for a property owner who wanted to operate a storage facility. The requested use was not permitted, but Mr. Pacheco nevertheless placed the request on the City Council's agenda for the meeting on December 5, 2012. Mr. Singhal advised the Council that, based on permissive usage, it was not in the City's best interest to allow the permit. The zoning change request was voted on and denied, which upset Mr. Pacheco. f. In 2012, facing significant future financial concerns, the City Council's majority Sheriff asked Mr. Singhal to seek a proposal from the Los Angeles County 011er.111 P-r to provide police services for the City of Baldwin Park. Even though this was only an exploratory move, the Police Officers Association ("POA") was strongly opposed. The POA is a heavy financial fonder of both Mr. Pacheco and Ms. Rubio, and both Mr. Pacheco and Ms. Rubio opposed this action by the Council majority. Even though Mr. Singhal was only performing his duties and following directions of the Council majority, which he is obligated to do, the POA, Mr. Pacheco and Ms. Rubio blamed and targeted Mr. Singhal. On numerous occasions, the POA, Mr. Pacheco and Ms. Rubio wanted to stop the proposal process and got upset when Mr. Singhal would report matters pertaining to the process or actions of POA and their attorneys. The process to hire contract with the LA County Sheriff is lengthy and was never completed prior to Mr. Singlial's removal. g. On or about February 6, 2012, Mr. Pacheco wanted the City to hire Sid Mousavi of Advanced Applied Engineering to perform projects for the City. Mr. Mousavi is a friend of Mr. Pacheco, and used to work for the City. However, Mr. Mousavi had a poor track record with the City, was under investigation by the FBI for bribing council members in other cities, and wanted too much money for the contracts with the City. Mr. Singhal spoke with the City's Public Works Director, William Galvez, who agreed with Mr. Singhal that Mr. Mousavi should not be hired. Mr. Mousavi was not hired. This outcome was reported to Mr. Pacheco on or about April 2, 2012, causing Mr. Pacheco to blame Mr. Singhal for blocking the hiring of Mr. Mousavi. h. In or around June 2011 the City hired Del Terra as construction manager for the Transit Center parking structure project. Mr. Singhal had concerns regarding the selection of Del Terra and believed that the public Works Director may have been influenced by Ms. Rubio into hiring them, given Ms. Rubio's past support for Del ATTACHMENT "A" CLAIM FOR DAMAGES TO VIJAY SINGHAL AGAINST THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK Terra. Around August of 2012, Mr. Singhal noticed that Del Terra, had overbilled the City by more than $130,000 in excess of the fixed price contracted amount. Mr. Singhal investigated the matter and also found other issues with Del Terra's project management. Mr. Singhal wrote a strong letter to Del Terra about their overbilling and performance concerns and reported the matter to the City Council at a closed session meeting in August 2012. The City Council agreed with Mr. Singhal's concerns. After the meeting, Ms. Rubio expressed her frustration with Mr. Singhal about his actions. Del Terra is a big donor to Ms. Rubio's campaign. i. On or about August 9, 2012, Mr. Pacheco asked the City to hire his friend, Jesse Marez with Century Diversified, to perform engineering services for the City. In Mr. Singlial's opinion, Mr. Marez was not qualified for the services needed and was proposing unneeded services at an exorbitant rate -- $175 per hour as opposed to the market rate of $75-100 per hour. Mr. Singhal was concerned that bringing Century Diversified would cost the City significant amounts of money for services that the City did not need. On or about August 22, 2012, Mr. Singhal reported to and discussed his concerns with the City Attorney, who told Mr. Singhal to seek City Council direction. Mr. Singhal prepared a staff report identifying his concerns and reported his concerns to the City Council in closed session on or about September 5, 2012. Based on Mr. Singlial's revelations the Council determined that Mr. Marez and his firm should not be hired. Mr. Pacheco was very upset. j. From 2011 to 2013, as part of labor negotiations the City Council had asked Mr. Singhal to seek financial concessions from the various employee bargaining units including the POA. The POA instead wanted massive pay raises ($5-$6 million), but Mr. Singhal recommended against raises in order to control the City's budget and spending. Moreover Mr. Singhal recommended that certain benefits, such as retirement benefits, must be curtailed to ensure City's long-term fiscal stability. The POA was opposed to any concessions. Since the POA was a major contributor to Mr. Pacheco and Ms. Rubio's campaigns, they gave Mr. Singhal a very hard time about not supporting pay increases for the POA and for seeking concessions. Mr. Singhal felt that Mr. Pacheco always went out of his way to discredit, accuse and/or humiliate Mr. Singhal and others who tried to expose problems with the POA and other individuals and entities. Mr. Pacheco and Ms. Rubio often publicly accused Mr. Singhal and other Council members of not negotiating with the POA in good faith and made false accusations and representations in this regard. In order to demonstrate that what Mr. Pacheco and Ms. Rubio represented in the open meetings was not true and to dispute their claims, the City Council waived the confidentiality of the closed session and asked Mr. Singhal to write a report about the negotiation positions of Mr. Pacheco and Ms. Rubio in closed session. On or about October 16, 2013, Mr. Singhal prepared a report pursuant to Council direction. Mr. Pacheco and Ms. Rubio were angry and humiliated by Mr. Singlial's report, which ultimately exposed their corrupt tactics. k. In 2013, the City received a $125,000 bill from the Valley County Water District for water connections pertaining to a parking structure that had been built for the City. Mr. Singhal thought that amount was unreasonable and approached the Page 4 of 11 ATTACHMENT "A" CLAIM FOR DAMAGES TO VIJAY SINGHAL AGAINST THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK Water District to inquire about a reduction in or about April 2013. Mr. Pacheco's wife, Lenet Pacheco, is on the board of the Water District and voted against the reduction. At the next City Council meeting, Mr. Pacheco asked Mr. Singhal why he had requested the reduction. Mr. Singhal was again doing his job to act in the City's best interest, and was correct about the overcharge -- the amount was ultimately reduced by about $100,000, to roughly $25,000. Nevertheless, Mr. Pacheco was frustrated with Mr. Singhal. 1. Mr. Singhal also reported various lawsuits involving Mike Taylor to the City Council, to the chagrin of Mr. Pacheco and Ms. Rubio, who were very supportive and protective of Mr. Taylor and the police department. i. Specifically, around 2010 or 2011, a lawsuit against the City was filed by John Leung, whose request to serve as a reserve police officer had been denied by the Police Chief. Mr. Leung was close friends with Mr. Taylor, and Mr. Taylor was the primary witness in Mr. Leung's lawsuit. Mr. Singhal reported the matter and Mr. Taylor's involvement in the lawsuit to the City Council, which reporting seemed to anger Mr. Pacheco. ii. Around 2012, two members of the POA (Mark Adams and Chris Kuberry) sued the City, the Police Chief, another Council Member and Mr. Singhal in a lawsuit alleging First Amendment violations. Mr. Taylor was a major witness against the City in that case. Mr. Singhal reported to the City Council that Mr. Taylor made false statements as a police Captain, that Mr. Taylor should not have offered false testimony against the City, and that the City was forced to expend a large amount of money as a result. Mr. Singhal worked with the attorneys to develop a strategy to discredit Mr. Taylor on the stand. In several closed City Council sessions from around 2012 to 2013, Mr. Singhal discussed these matters. Mr. Pacheco was upset that Mr. Singhal was saying negative things about the police department and Mr. Taylor in the closed session and the lawsuit. in. In November 2013, Mr. Singhal learned that the POA was seeking to obtain a "vote of no confidence" as to Mr. Singhal and two other employees. At a City Council open meeting on or about November 20, 2013, Council Member Monica Garcia read into the record a letter written by Mr. Singhal that challenged the POA's intent to conduct the "vote of no confidence." The letter included the following statement by Mr. Singhal: "I have been informed that now the POA controls the Council and can get what it wants." Mr. Singhal believes that Mr. Pacheco and Ms. Rubio, who were endorsed by and highly supportive of the POA, were incensed by his continuing exposure of corrupt practices by the POA. n. On two or three occasions, Mr. Pacheco used the City's credit card for personal expenses, and balked about reimbursing the City for his personal charges. Mr. Pacheco asked Mr. Singhal to take care of the charges, and was frustrated with Mr. Singhal because he would not allow the charges to simply be paid by the City. o. On December 4, 2013, after one of the City Council members did not seek reelection, the Council held a meeting to swear in the new City Council. At the meeting Mr. Pacheco requested a special meeting on December 10, 2013, to Page 5 of 11 ATTACHMENT "A" CLAIM FOR DAMAGES TO VIJAY SINGHAL AGAINST THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK review contracts of Executive Team members. The Council agreed to the special meeting, which was supposed to be held merely to review contracts. p. However, on the night of December 8 and the morning of December 9, 2013, Mr. Singhal received e-mails from Mr. Pacheco, Ms. Rubio and Cruz Baca (a new Council Member as of November 2013). All three e-mails asked for Mr. Singhal to post the agenda for a special study session to be held at the meeting on December 10, 2013, for items including "Public Employees: Discipline/Dismissal/Release" (two of the e-mails contained the same typo: "Disclipline/Dismissl/Release") and "Public Employee Appointment" of seven titles including Chief Executive Officer. The three e-mails were strikingly similar to each other and contained the exact same typos, strongly suggesting that the three Council Members had colluded with one another outside of session, in violation of the applicable laws and against protocol. The e-mails were all asking for the same agenda items, listed in identical order, and were all sent to Mr. Singhal within a 15-hour time frame. q. On December 9, 2013, Captain Mike Taylor was placed on administrative leave by the City, with the approval of Mr. Singhal, pending an investigation of wrongdoing. As a standard process, Captain Taylor was placed on leave for the duration of the investigation, was ordered not to be in contact with any Council member, not to enter any part of a City facility which is not open to the general public, and was directed not to go to City Hall during the pendency of the investigation. r. In violation of these directions, a mere one day later on December 10, 2013, while the Council was meeting in closed session, Captain Taylor was at the City Hall, just outside the conference room where the closed session was being held. s. At the special meeting on December 10, 2013, the City Council had a closed session, and asked Mr. Singhal to leave. In the scope of his duties, Mr. Singhal normally attended closed, session meetings. Mr. Singhal was then called in to the closed session and the City's Mayor, Manuel Lozano, told Mr. Singhal that the Council decided to terminate him "without cause" and that his contract would be honored. There was no reason provided for Mr. Singhal's termination. t. A police officer escorted Mr. Singhal from the Baldwin Park City Hall (a building open to the public) following his removal, as though he was a criminal or had done something wrong, which caused humiliation for Mr. Singhal. Members of the public and staff witnessed this event, and it was reported in the newspaper. See The San Gabriel Valley Tribune, "Baldwin Park council axes top officials in special meeting," Jason Henry and Rebecca Kimitch, December 10, 2013. u. After termination of Mr. Singhal and the Police Chief, on December 10, 2013, the City Council, led by Mr. Pacheco and Ms. Rubio, made Mr. Taylor the Chief of Police and also appointed him as the acting CEO. Led by Mr. Pacheco and Ms. Rubio, the City Council took this action the very next day after Mr. Taylor had been placed on administrative leave and instructed not to contact any City Council member, not to go in to City Hall, etc., and did so despite the fact that there was a pending the investigation against Mr. Taylor. v. Mike Taylor is holding the office of acting CEO and Police Chief, which constitutes a conflict according to the California Attorney General. Mr. Taylor has Page 6 of 11 ATTACHMENT "A" CLAIM FOR DAMAGES TO VIJAY SINGHAL AGAINST THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK no experience in being the CEO, whether permanent or acting, he was on leave pending investigation when he was improperly appointed as CEO and Mr. Taylor was recently granted a very substantial pay increase, suggesting that he has a significant influence over the new City Council. 8. Mr. Singhal contends that Mr. Taylor, Mr. Pacheco and Ms. Rubio spearheaded the termination of Mr. Singhal in retaliation for Mr. Singhal's many protected reports, as detailed above, including his reporting of wrongdoings by Mr. Taylor, for initiating an investigation against Mr. Taylor. Mr. Singhal further contends that his termination was arranged in order to provide Mr. Taylor an opportunity to cover up the investigation into his wrongdoings. 9. For years Mr. Singhal protected the public interest, and coffers, from the unlawful and unethical actions in which Mr. Pacheco and Ms. Rubio wanted to engage, many of which actions were obviously meant to line their own pockets with public funds and the pockets of their supporters, friends, etc. For years Mr. Taylor, Mr. Pacheco and Ms. Rubio steeped in their frustration because they could not take action against Mr. Singhal — they did not have the majority on the Council. But the very moment that they obtained the majority and could take action against their nemesis, Mr. Singhal, they did. True to form, Mr. Taylor, Mr. Pacheco and Ms. Rubio ignored the law, ignored Mr. Singhal's contract and just did what they wanted without regard for the consequences to the City of Baldwin Park and its taxpayers. 10. The City of Baldwin Park and its employees, officers, agents and/or servants violated applicable laws including the following: a. The California Brown Act, codified at California Government Code §§ 54950, et seq., including but not limited to California Government Code §§ 54952.2, 54953, 54957, 54957.1, 54960.1. b. Retaliation, including but not limited to California Labor Code § 1102.5. c. Breach of Contract. d. 42 U.S.C. & 1983. e. Defamation. f. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress. 11. Scheduling and conducting a meeting outside the guidelines of the applicable laws including the Brown Act and the municipal code is illegal, and has the effect of rendering any actions taken therein null and void. California Government Code § 54960.1. As outlined, it appears obvious that Council Members Pacheco, Rubio and Baca illegally discussed the removal of employees including Mr. Singhal, and the appointment of replacement employees, outside the closed session and outside the legally mandated parameters for removal of officers. Mr. Singhal's removal should therefore be deemed void. 12. In scheduling and executing the meeting, Mr. Pacheco, Ms. Rubio and Ms. Baca violated the legally mandated procedures for removing Mr. Singhal. In Stockton Newspapers, Inc. v. Members of Redevelopment Agency (1985) 171 Cal.App.3d 95, 104, the court held that non- Page 7 of 11 ATTACHMENT "A" CLAIM FOR DAMAGES TO VIJAY SINGHAL AGAINST THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK public telephone conversations constitute a "meeting" within the purview of the public meeting law, and are therefore a violation of the Brown Act. 13. The proper procedure for removal of Mr. Singhal would have been asking the City Council during the meeting on December 4, 2013, to hold a closed session on December 10 for termination of contracts. The request for a special meeting on December 10 was merely to review contracts, which does not authorize the Council to terminate employees and appoint new ones. See Brown Act, California Government Code § 54950, et seq. 14. In addition, a published newspaper article quoted Ms. Baca as reportedly stating that the change in the City's leadership, including the removal of Mr. Singhal, was because "the people wanted change... Voters were very specific about what they wanted." See The San Gabriel Valley Tribune, "Baldwin Park council axes top officials in special meeting," Jason Henry and Rebecca Kimitch, December 10, 2013. This statement is defamatory because it insinuates that the voting public asked for the removal of Mr. Singhal. Moreover, if in fact Mr. Singlial's removal was due to specific complaints against him, the City did not follow the mandated procedures of California Government Code § 54957(b)(2). 15. Moreover, it is suspicious that Robert Tafoya, who was appointed as City Attorney during the meeting of December 10, 2013, attended the closed session meeting on that date, after the former City Attorney Joseph Pannone was dismissed. Mr. Tafoya had never previously worked for the City nor attended a closed session meeting. He likely would not have known to have been present unless someone had previously told him what would occur; moreover, outsiders are not allowed in closed session meetings. Indeed, Mr. Tafoya has never been a City Attorney. Instead, he was the personal attorney for Ms. Rubio's husband and he made a substantial contribution to her husband's campaign on December 6th just a few days before his appointment, The City did not follow the proper vetting process to appoint Mr. Tafoya, which requires screening of qualifications, setting compensation by a resolution in an open meeting, and taking an oath of office. See California Government Code §§ 1360, 36506, 36507; City of Baldwin Park Code of Ordinances § 31.16 ("The City Council shall appoint a qualified person to the position of City Attorney. No person shall be eligible for appointment thereto unless he has been admitted to the practice of law in the state for at least five years."). 16. Mr. Tafoya's presence at the closed meeting further rendered the meeting and any actions taken therein null and void, and also invaded Mr. Singhal's privacy. The appointment of Mr. Tafoya was then placed on the agenda for the City's public meeting on December 16, 2013, apparently after the City learned of its mistake in having appointed him without the proper process. These acts of the new council suggest a culture of corruption and favoritism. 17. California Labor Code § 1102.5 prohibits retaliation. 18. As outlined above, financial donors and individuals with personal and familial relationships with Mr. Pacheco and/or Ms. Rubio have sought favors with the City, including but not limited to contracts, concessions, pay increases and excessive pay. There were also some performance issues with those individuals who had obtained contracts with the City through their connections with Mr. Pacheco and/or Ms. Rubio. In many cases, doing business with those individuals and/or companies was not in the best interest of the City financially or otherwise. 19. As CEO, Mr. Singhal was obligated to protect the City's interests. Mr. Singhal "elt that Page 8 of 11 ATTACHMENT "A" CLAIM FOR DAMAGES TO VIJAY SINGHAL AGAINST THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK Mr. Pacheco and Ms. Rubio were often blinded by their perceived indebtedness or for other reasons to these parties and supported them without due regard for their qualifications, efficiency or cost. On numerous occasions as set forth above, Mr. Singhal reported to the City Council matters of concern regarding individuals that Mr. Pacheco and/or Ms. Rubio were affiliated with, either through friendships, donations or by familial relations. 20. Mr. Pacheco, Ms. Rubio and Ms. Baca retaliated against Mr. Singhal because of his refusal to give in to the corrupt expectations of Mr. Pacheco and Ms. Rubio, and his refusal to allow inappropriate and/or unlawful favors and concessions to the individuals and entities to which Mr. Pacheco and/or Ms. Rubio were affiliated. Mr. Pacheco and Ms. Rubio were also very upset when Mr. Singhal reported to the City Council the unethical actions of Mr. Pacheco and Ms. Rubio, the POA, and/or Mike Taylor. Mr. Pacheco and Ms. Rubio appeared to have a special relationship with Mr. Taylor, and Mr. Singhal witnessed them reacting in Mr. Taylor's favor when any concerns pertaining to Mr. Taylor were reported to the City Council. 21. Additionally, the City Council was often divided on policy issues and their relationships were quite contentious. It became even more divisive due to the desires of Mr. Pacheco and Ms. Rubio to provide pay increases and concessions to the Police Officers Association, which has been a strong supporter of the two. While Mr. Pacheco and Ms. Rubio would vote and act in a certain manner in closed sessions, they tried to portray a different image in open session meetings. In order to deal with this hypocrisy, the City Council majority approved and directed Mr. Singhal to disclose details of certain items including voting at closed session in public. Both Mr. Pacheco and Ms. Rubio were very upset with Mr. Singhal following his disclosure of their lies and duplicity, because they were concerned that such exposure would hurt their credibility and image. 22. Literally as soon as Mr. Pacheco and Ms. Rubio secured the majority in the City Council by ensuring that their chosen candidate was elected into an open City Council seat, they, along with Ms. Baca and Mr. Taylor, took action to remove Mr. Singhal from his position, in order to silence and retaliate against Mr. Singhal. Breach of Contract 23. Section 4 of Mr. Singlial's Employment Agreement with the City provides in relevant portion as follows: "In the event Employee is not in breach of this Agreement, and is terminated by the City Council for reasons other than malfeasance in office, City shall place Employee on a paid leave of absence of a period of six (6) months prior to the date the termination is effected. During the period the Employee is placed on such paid leave of absence, he will continue to receive full salary and benefits as established in this Agreement..." 24. Pursuant to Mr. Singhal's contract, he should have been placed on leave and the City should have announced his departure as such. Mr. Singhal had negotiated this clause into his contract with the City in order to avoid the very issue that the City's wrongful classification has now created -- the stigma of being "fired" as opposed to taking a leave to find another position. The City wrongfully announced that Mr. Singhal was terminated, which was defamatory, has made it much more difficult for Mr. Singhal to seek and obtain a new position of employment, and has created an unnecessary emotional distress for Mr. Singhal. 25. At the City Council meeting on March 19, 2014, the City Attorney publicly stated that ATTACHMENT "A" CLAIM FOR DAMAGES TO VIJAY SINGHAL AGAINST THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK the City did not have a CEO or City Manager, which meant that Mr. Singhal was terminated. Also during that same meeting, Mr. Pacheco stated that Mr. Singhal had been "terminated." The City Attorney advised that Mr. Singhal was not terminated, but instead placed on administrative leave, and also corrected his earlier comment to indicate that he was wrong because the City does have a CEO who is on leave. These remarks suggest that the City acknowledged an error in the classification of Mr. Singhal's leave as a "termination." However, as late as March 2014, Mr. Pacheco is still announcing in the City's public meetings that Mr. Singhal was terminated. In addition, published articles classified Mr. Singhal's departure as being "axe[d]" or "fired." See, e.g., The San Gabriel Valley Tribune, "Baldwin Park council axes top officials in special meeting," Jason Henry and Rebecca Kimitch, December 10, 2013. 26. The proverbial bell had already been rung when Mr. Singhal's "termination" was originally announced. The City's termination and announcement constitutes a breach of Mr. Singhal's contract. 27. Moreover, the at-will presumption may also be rebutted by showing the existence of an implied-in-fact promise not to discharge without good cause, which may be provided by a course of conduct, including oral representations, notwithstanding a company's "at-will" employment statements. 28. A breach of an express or implied-in-fact contract not to terminate without cause may also constitute a breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. 29. The removal of Mr. Singhal from his position with the City deprived Mr. Singhal of his rights under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, per 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 30. Mr. Singhal's reports and speech regarding concerns with favoritism, corruption, misappropriation of public funds and resources, harassment and performance of public contracts were matters of public concern and importance. In retaliation, an adverse employment action was taken against Mr. Singhal when he was terminated from his position with the City. 31. The statement that Mr. Singhal was "terminated" or "fired" from his position, as opposed to being placed on leave per his contract, constitutes defamation per se by Mr. Pacheco. 32. Mr. Taylor, Mr. Pacheco and Ms. Rubio knew or should have known that their harassment of and retaliation against Mr. Singhal would result in severe emotional distress, in addition to the loss of earnings and future earning capacity and other pecuniary loss. Among other concerns, Mr. Singhal is highly distressed about being classified as "fired" from his position, tarnished image and reputation despite outstanding performance, accomplishments, high ethics and integrity primarily for refusal to give in to corrupt expectations of certain politicians reputation, and likely seeing the City of Baldwin Park return to its poor financial condition due to corruption, after all of Mr. Singhal's successful efforts at reviving the City's financial state and level of efficiency. 33. Mr. Singhal's emotional damage includes without limitation stress, insomnia, Page 10 of 11 ATTACHMENT "A" CLAIM FOR DAMAGES TO VIJAY SINGHAL AGAINST THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK depression, irritability, headaches, social withdrawal, and isolation. 34. Mr. Singhal is entitled to recover damages including but not limited to lost past and future income, lost benefits (including without limitation medical, dental and vision insurance; vacation and sick pay; participation in the CalPERS defined benefit plan; and allowances for an automobile and cell phone), interest, punitive or exemplary damages against individual defendants, attorneys' fees and costs, and other potential remedies. 35. Mr. Singhal is also entitled to recover damages for severe emotional distress caused by the actions of the City and its employees, officers, agents and/or servants. Page 11 of 11 NMI' Clerk's Official Filing Stamp To: City of Baldwin Park 4. Claimant's Date of Birth (if a minor) 1. Name of Claimant Danteandre Villa 5. ClaimNredicpalonF. 2. Hone Address of Claimant 6. Home Tele hone Number 24::3 Alice Rodriguez Circle, Duarte, Ca. 910101 (626)37 -8461 3. Business Address of Claimant r 7. Business Telephone Number 8. Name and address to which you desire notices or communications to be sent regarding this claim: Danteandre Villas same as above 9. When did DAMAGE or INJURY occur? 10:00 p m 10. Names of any City employees involved in INJURY or. DAMAGE: Date: 12 �2 3 /13 Time: . ® Name Department If claim is for Equitable Indemnity, give date claimant served with complaint: Please see attached, 11. Where did DAMAGE or INJURY occur? 10 freeway at or near the 605 interchange, Baldw 12. Describe in detail how the DAMAGE or INJURY occurred. Please see attached. 13. Were police or paramedics called? Yes ❑ No 14. If physician was visited due to injury, include date of first visit and physician's If yes, was a report filed? Yes ❑ No name, address and phone number: If yes, what is the Report No? 14. Why do you claim the City of Baldwin Park is responsible? (Please be specific — Use additional sheet if necessary) Please see attached. 15. List damages incurred todate?Prope:rty damages $389 ®60, please see attached® 16. Total amount of claim to date: $ 389.60 Basis for Computation: property damage paid. — Limited Civil Case: ❑ Yes ❑ No (State the amount of your claim if the total amount is $10,000 or less. If it is over $10,000 no dollar amount shall be stated, but you are required to state whether the claim would be a limited civil case (total amount of claim does not exceed $25,000).) 17. Total amount of prospective damages: $ 0 Basis for Computation: 18. Witnesses to DAMAGE or INJURY: List all persons and addresses of persons known to have information: . Name Mo Had 1 e y% Tow Address Phon4 6 2 6) 653-0454 Name Mark Address Phone (562)659-323 19. Signature of Claimant or person filing on claimant's behalf, relationship to claimant and date: t hereby certify (ordecl are) underpenalty ofpe fury under the laws ofdre state ofCakfomia that &efo;690iTis Me and carrn=bt o uas°of r, y knowledge. l Danteandre Villa 06/18/14 Si, nature Relationship to Claimant Printed Name Date imvw r" reSenia<aon of a Taise claim is a Felony (venal uoae section 7Z) CC Form 1 (Rev 7/06) n Par Attachment I A — Villa, Danteandre OAMML U; MMM411 IMAWKWEI The City of Baldwin Park, employee had actual and constructive notice of the dangerous condition of the disrepaired highway, within the Baldwin Park city limits, which included large holes and cracked asphalt areas on the 10 freeway in the city of Baldwin Park. The city of Baldwin Park employee had the authority and it was his or her responsibility as a public employee to inspect the property of the public entity or to see that inspections were made to determine whether dangerous conditions existed in the public property, that the funds and other means for making such inspections or for seeing that such inspections were made were immediately available to the public employee, and that the dangerous condition had existed for such a period of and was such "an. 01.—V oust nature that the public P-mninvet-, in the exercise of his authority and responsibilities with due care, should have discovered the condition and its dangerous character. Due to the carelessness, negligence, and nonfeasance of the City employees, Claimant has been sustained property damage. �,,ILIIMAKIAMIIIWILM The City of Baldwin Park owned, operated, and controlled the highway areas within the city limits, including the 10 freeway at or near the 605 interchange. On December 23, 2013, at the time of the incident herein described, the 10 freeway in the city of Baldwin Park, was in a dangerous condition. The negligence, carelessness and nonfeasance of the City of Baldwin Park, employees resulted in a dangerous condition which created a reasonably foreseeable risk of great property damage. The 10 freeway, within the Baldwin Park city limits was in disrepair, which included large holes and cracked asphalt areas. The subject area being in such disrepair created a dangerous condition. Claimant's vehicle was traveling on the 10 freeway at or near the 605 interchange when suddenly the vehicle entered a sunken area, a highly dangerous and defective area, causing property damage to the vehicle. The dangerous condition was directly attributable wholly or in substantial part to a negligent or wrongful act of the employee and the employee had the authority and the funds and other means immediately available to take alternative action which would not have created the dangerous condition; or the employee had the authority and it was his or her responsibility to take adequate measures to protect against the dangerous condition at the expense of the public entity and the funds and other means for doing so were immediately available to him or her, and he or she had actual or constructive notice of the dangerous condition a sufficient time prior to the injury to have taken measures to protect against the dangerous condition. lime mialmGm=1 The City of Baldwin Park owned, operated, and controlled the highway areas within the city limits, including the 10 freeway at or near the 605 interchange. On December 23, 2013, at the time of the incident herein described, the 10 freeway in the city of Baldwin Park, was in a dangerous condition. The negligence, carelessness and nonfeasance of the City of Baldwin Park, employees resulted in a dangerous condition which created a reasonably foreseeable risk of great property damage. The 10 freeway, within the Baldwin Park city limits was in disrepair, which included large holes and cracked cement areas. The subject area being in such disrepair created a dangerous condition. Claimant's vehicle was traveling on the 10 freeway at or near the 605 interchange when suddenly the vehicle entered a sunken area, a highly dangerous and defective area, causing property damage W tfie vehicle. The dangerous condition was directly attributable wholly or in substantial part to a negligent or wrongful act of the employee and the employee had the authority and the funds and other means immediately available to take alternative action which would not have created the dangerous condition; or the employee had the authority and it was his or her responsibility to take adequate measures to protect against the dangerous condition at the expense of the public entity and the funds and other means for doing so were immediately available to him or her, and he or she had actual or constructive notice of the dangerous condition a sufficient time prior to the injury to have taken measures to protect against the dangerous condition. The area was such a daw4erous condi Lion thaa shortly after "anOtlier vehicle was ppulllb-rl over to the side of the freeway and experienced the same problems, except he had greater property damage to his wheel rim. The Hadley tow truck driver indicated that he had over ten calls within the prior 24 hour period, with vehicles that experienced the same problems. You may contact the tow truck driver, Mo at Hadley Towing, (626) 653-0454 and Mark (562)659-3234, the other driver that pulled over to the shoulder and had also sustained property damage to his wheel rim. It was truly a dangerous condition. HUB OF UTHE 4�X • o SAN GABRIEL ' n 2� VALLEY �A ti5 O O�q.TED J A t 4 A r , [c? Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Daniel Wall, P.E., Director of Public Works . MURAM SUMMARY it is requested that the City Council approve a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) allowing the City of Baldwin Park to receive $137,246 in Proposition A Discretionary Incentive funds for participating in the National Transit Database (NTD) reporting. FISCAL IMPACT The City will receive $137,246 ($143,547 less $6,301 for MTA audit) from the MTA as Proposition A Discretionary revenue. These restricted funds are used to offset the operations of the City's transit services. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached MOU with the Los Angeles County MTA and authorize the Mayor to execute said agreement. LEGAL REVIEW None required The City of Baldwin Park voluntarily reports transit and ridership information to MTA. The information includes annual costs, revenues, number of passengers, and services provided by our transit system. MTA's collected data from each local operator generates additional Federal Section 5307 capital funds to the Los Angeles County region which is based on the ridership of local transit systems, including Baldwin Park. The City of Baldwin Park receives funds for its NTD reporting based on the same formula that the FTA uses to reimburse the MTA. The Federal process for reviewing the data creates a two -year lag between data submittal and fund disbursement. Based on the City's NTD reporting for FY 201 1 -12, Baldwin Park is eligible to receive $137,245. This amount is being paid to the City as Proposition A Discretionary funds and they must be utilized in accordance with Proposition A Transportation guidelines. The MOU requires the City to comply with all requirements specified by the FTA guidelines for reporting NTD statistics. MTA'\IOU Agreement (MOU.PAIBLDPKI4) MOU.PAIBLDPK I4 PROPOSITION A DISCRETIONARY INCENTIVE GRANT PROGRAM MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR COLLECTING AND REPORTING DATA FOR THE NATIONAL TRANSIT DATABASE FOR REPORT YEAR 2012 This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is entered into as of May 21, 2014 by and between Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority ( "LACMTA ") and the City of Baldwin Park (the "City "). WHEREAS, on November 14, 1980, the voters of the County of Los Angeles approved by majority vote Proposition A, an ordinance establishing a one -half percent sales tax for public transit purposes; and WHEREAS, at its September 26, 2001 meeting, the LACMTA authorized payment of Proposition A Discretionary incentive funds to each participating agency in an amount equal to the Federal funds generated for the region by each agency's reported data; and WHEREAS, at its June 19, 2013 meeting, LACMTA approved the Fiscal Year FY 2013- 14 transit fund allocations, which included funds to make payments to all cities that voluntarily reported NTD data for FY 2011 -12; and WHEREAS, the City has been a participant in LACMTA's Consolidated National Transit Database (NTD) Reporters Random Sampling Program for FY 2011 -12 and has voluntarily submitted NTD data to the LACMTA for FY 2011 -12 which successfully passed independent audit without findings; and WHEREAS, the City has requested funds under the Proposition A Discretionary Incentive Program for collecting and reporting data for the NTD from the FY 2011 -12 Report Year (the "Project "); and WHEREAS, on March 10, 2014, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) published in the Federal Register the FY 2013 -14 Apportionments, Allocations, and Program Information including unit values for the data reported to the NTD; and WHEREAS, the parties desire to agree on the terms and conditions for payment for the Project. NOW, THEREFORE, LACMTA and the City hereby agree to the following terms and procedures: ARTICLE 1. TERM 1.0 This Memorandum of Understanding ( "MOU ") will be in effect from July 1, 2013, through June 30, 2015 at which time all unused funds shall lapse. MOU 12 Agreement NTD Prop A MOU.PAIBLDPKI4 ARTICLE 2. STANDARDS 2.0 To receive payment for the submittal of the FY 2011 -12 NTD statistics, the City warrants that it: A. Adhered to the Federal Guidelines for collecting and Reporting NTD statistics; B. Prepared and submitted the FY 2011 -12 ANNUAL NTD REPORT of the City's fixed -route and /or demand response transit service to the LACMTA on or before September 30, 2012; C. Allowed the LACMTA to assign an independent auditor to review the submitted FY 2011 -12 NTD statistics for conformity in all material respects with the accounting requirements of the FTA as set forth in its applicable Uniform System of Accounts. ARTICLE 3. PAYMENT OF FUNDS TO CITY 3.0 LACMTA shall pay the City for collecting and reporting FY 2011 -12 NTD statistics. LACMTA shall pay the City for submitting the FY 2011 -12 ANNUAL NTD REPORT for the applicable transit services as follows: MOTOR BUS SERVICE For City's motor bus service, LACMTA shall pay an amount equal to the 284,934 revenue vehicle miles reported by the City multiplied by the FTA unit value of $.4199683 per revenue vehicle mile, plus the 608,820 passenger miles reported by the City squared, divided by the $1,067,937 operating cost reported by the City, multiplied by the FTA unit value of $.0093838 less the cost of the $5,396 in audits paid by LACMTA. See Attachment A for detail. DIAL -A -RIDE SERVICE For City's dial -a -ride service, LACMTA shall pay an amount equal to the 48,776 revenue vehicle miles reported by the City multiplied by the FTA unit value of $.4199683 per revenue vehicle mile, plus the 58,097 passenger miles reported by the City squared, divided by the $223,562 operating cost reported by the City, multiplied by the FTA unit value of $.0093838 less the cost of the $905 in audits paid by LACMTA. See Attachment A for detail. 3.1 The City shall submit one invoice to LACMTA prior to December 31, 2015, in the amount of $137,245 in order to receive its payment described above. MOU 12 Agreement NTD Prop A MOU.PAIBLDPKI4 3.2 INVOICE BY CITY: Send invoice with supporting documentation to: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Accounts Payable P. O. Box 512296 Los Angeles, CA 90051 -0296 accountspayable@metro.net Re: LACMTA MOU# MOU.PAIBLDPKI4 M.S. Pari Ahmadi (99 -24 -4) ARTICLE 4. CONDITIONS 4.0 The City agrees to comply with all requirements specified by the FTA guidelines for reputing 'NT D statistics. 4.1 The City understands and agrees that LACMTA shall have no liability in connection with the City's use of the funds. The City shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless LACMTA and its officers, agents, and employees from and against any and all liability and expenses including defense costs and legal fees and claims for damages of any nature whatsoever, arising out of any act or omission of the City, its officers, agents, employees, and subcontractors in performing the services under this MOU. 4.2 The City is not a contractor, agent or employee of LACMTA. The City shall not represent itself as a contractor, agent or employee of LACMTA and shall have no power to bind LACMTA in contract or otherwise. 4.3 The City agrees that expenditure of the Proposition A Discretionary Incentive funds will be used for projects that meet the eligibility, administrative, audit and lapsing requirements of the Proposition A and Proposition C Local Return guidelines most recently adopted by the LACMTA Board. 4.4 These expenditures will be subject to AUDIT as part of LACMTA's annual Consolidated Audit. ARTICLE 5. REMEDIES 5.0 LACMTA reserves the right to terminate this MOU and withhold or recoup funds if it determines that the City has not met the requirements specified by the FTA for collecting and submitting NTD statistics through LACMTA. ARTICLE 6. MISCELLANEOUS 6.0 This MOU constitutes the entire understanding between the parties, with respect to the subject matter herein. MOU 12 Agreement NTD Prop A MOU.PAIBLDPKI4 6.1 The MO U shall not be amended, nor any provisions or breach hereof waived, except in writing signed by the parties who agreed to the original MOU or the same level of authority. # ' yflaff MCI 7.0 LACMTA's Address: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Gateway Plaza Los Angeles, CA 90012 Attention: Pari Ahmadi (99 -24 -4) 7.1 City's Address: Baldwin Park 14403 E. Pacific Ave. Baldwin Park,CA 91706 Attn: David Lopez dlopez @baldwinpark.com MOU 12 Agreement NTD Prop A MOU.PAIBLDPK 14 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and LACMTA have caused this MOU to be executed by their duly authorized representatives on the date noted below: CITY: City of Baldwin Park Mayor Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Legal Counsel Date: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Bv: Arthur T. Leahy Chief Executive officer D.q tP - APPROVED AS TO FORM: JOHN F. KRATTLI County Counsel Af By: epu Date: MOU 12 Agreement NTD Prop A LL E eo E m o- w c -F rn "I o q 'R q m -1 r -1 t w2 7, Rl .1 11 .1 1�M o0 IN 2— N , 01 "Z 0 -,q q . omr . . . . . . .............. .......................................... I N bi to o o "0 � m S 2 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . nSm 10 ll� Ili - - - - F A cM - - - - - K - -- - - - - - . . . . . X . . . . . . S ml 1. 22 c5 m Z iii: 16 16 Ili 14 d IN Ij c5 cD Ili .6 16 16 6 6 1� 10 Iq q 2 R 2 S 6 15 16 Ili Ill 11; li 16 c5 16 ll� 1� 16 16 D Iq co t aoo ml .1 2 s R —.8 14 °mmo 6 4 .5,6 o m .6 6 j 5 m C6 'o 5 6 Iq M q m ll� No q a� m 8 'i 4 - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - -- 6 .6 'o 14 6,4 m,4.6 4 P s "i c5 <m �,6.6.6,5 �d .6 6 j 6 �,6 mm cmv - - - - - - - - mnnoNmmn - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - my - - - - - - - - - - �cY mm < 0 0 2 < E. E 52 E T t 3 Z5 7R "F Z Z -Z 2. 'o; . . . . . . . . . . . 2 g 0 0 .8 m m m m m Q Q Q u . . . . u coo 0 c 0 2' a' -�2 mo M, < rn STAFF REPORTS a' TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council ��. FROM: Shama P. Curian, Human Resources Manager � DATE: July 2, 2014 0. I n SUBJECT: Adoption Ado tion of Resolution 2014 -026 , Modifying the Part -Time Hourly Rate Schedule to Comply with State Minimum Wage Increases Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -026 amending Resolution No. 2008 -005 revising the existing part-time hourly rate schedule to comply with the State mandated minimum wage increases. FISCAL IMPACT The recommended pay rate adjustments are projected to cost an additional $149,601 beginning Fiscal Year 2014 -15. Of that cost, $108,260 will come from General Fund monies. These adjustments are reflected in the FY 2014 -15 Budget. The adjustments to the minimum wage increase on January 2016 will cost an additional $73,026 with $52,885 coming from General Fund monies. It is recommended that City Council adopt Resolution No. 2016 -026, a Resolution revising Resolution No. 2008 -005 modifying the part-time hourly rates and establishing a range schedule. 111KWA, n1► ? /1iWIT No legal review is required. On September 25, 2013 the California Legislature enacted legislation signed by the Governor of California, raising the minimum wage for all industries. The California minimum wage will increase to $9.00 effective July 1, 2014 and to $10.00 effective January 1, 2016. The City of Baldwin Park is required to adjust the pay rates of certain part -time positions to comply with State Law. The attached pay schedules reflect the pay adjustments to assure compliance with the law and to avoid internal compaction between the hierarchies of classifications. Additionally, the part-time schedule for hourly rates was originally developed based on the needs of departments, often on a case -by -case basis. As such, there wasn't consistency in determining the rates of the pa - 'me positions, nor was there a defined differential between each step and range. Given the need to revise the p -ti e employee pay schedule to comply with the minimum wage law, staff developed the attached schedules to create uniformity in the structure of the pay schedule, as well as consistency in pay of like positions with similar job duties, education levels, or responsibilities. Attachments: Resolution 2014-026: Establishing Hourly Pay Range Schedule for Part-Time Positions Attachment "A": City of Baldwin Park Part-Time Employee Hourly Pay Range Schedule effective July 1, 2014 Attachment "B": City of Baldwin Park Part-Time Employee Hourly Pay Range Schedule effective January 1, 2016. RESOLUTION NO. 2016-026 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING RESOLUTION 2008-005 ESTABLISHING AN HOURLY PAY RANGE SCHEDULE FOR PART-TIME POSITIONS. WHEREAS, on September 25, 2013, the California Legislature enacted legislation signed by the Governor of California, raising the minimum wage for all industries; and WHEREAS, the minimum wage will increase to $9.00 hourly on July 1, 2014 and to $10.00 hourly on January 1, 2016; and A , WIL'IERL-E: f-N Sthe City has certain part-time classifications that f[C-4111 below the new minimum wage amounts; and WHEREAS, the City of Baldwin Park is revising the pay range schedule to comply with State Law and to address internal compaction between the hierarchies of classifications. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Hourly Pay Ranges - Part-time employees in the positions indicated shallshall k� compensated as shown �n +kn f^11^%AAnn 1\ Attachment "A" eff-,,-+;%In 1111%1 1 LJ�- %,Wl I I %, I I%JVV I I Ul I Ll 1�_ 1%J11%JVV 11 1�1 I I �LL ,1 11 1 1 1, 2014 and 2) Attachment "B" effective January 1, 2016. Section 2. A part-time employee is eligible for merit increases within the established salary range of the position based on acceptable job performance as approved by the Department Head and provided that the employee has worked at least 1040 hours from the date of appointment or the date of last merit increase. Section 3. A part-time employee must meet the qualifications of a position as specified on the job specification in order to qualify for a promotion to a position with a higher rate of pay and more responsible duties. Section 4. Incumbents of part-time positions receive no benefits except those required by State and Federal Law. Section 5. That all Resolutions or portions thereof in conflict hereby are hereby repealed. Section 6. That the City Clerk shall forward a copy of this resolution to the Human Resources /Risk Manager and certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of July 2014. MANUELLOZANO MAYOR ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SS: CITY OF BALDWIN PARK Resolution No. 2014-026 Page 2 A] A AX/11 A r, k-, by r_%L1EJANDRfA AVILA, Deputy %Csity Clerk of thle City of Baldwin Park do Iluiew certify that t1he foregoing No. 2014-026 was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park at -a regular meeting thereof held on July 2, 2014 and that the same was adopted by the following vote to wit: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT.- COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ALEJANDRA AVILA CITY CLERK O : t- o4 1 C\l C-4 (Y) cy-) cy) c) (0: 0') LO: 00 1 � � NIA I-- r--: 0', LO t- iCD Cliq q MI (9 Vr C) C) C), C) C) N N N N N C,5 M 1 c) MI cy) CY) 60, (11) 61 r- C) C\j C14: C14, C14 CY) 00 00 C) 00 C) 1-- 0') 0') CN LO op O0; : CY) CD CD C) N N C-� C� 11 C� 1! �-cy), 613 ff3 6,3 6 ffl 6fl 60- 61), to 61), 61k 60- 69- 64 61). 611z 69- fA 6-11 1 Gi 69-, co m loo 00 co 'q CD CD r- t- 1 'q N (N C14. C) r-- CY) 0) i 04 Lo Lo Lo � 00 0: (D C� 1(-4: w CY) CY) (D (D N C14 N C\j Cl) 613, 61) ff)- ()- 60- 6-, 6,)- '(a 1 FF)- 63 60, (r) i 6p) K3 i 69r 69- 69 III (N; (D (D CD (D N (Y) Cl) 00 ',1- "qT 'C): CD m (D CO C),):i M: G) r--: m Lo, loo C� cj 6 6 0') � CY) C,4 C)!: a 64 60 to-116a: (f)- U)': 6q 1 f,q ta! 6R: 6q u-, 6')- (i3 6-, 6p, CO Oz 0-) 0-) m m 00; 00 CD I- r- I' "T (N'� CD m Ln0-) 0') 0') 17 CO 100 00 (O: 0) 0') 0') CD CD CD CD C3, C14 N 69- 61): 6s 61 . 6} 69- 61), 649" 0} Q!)- (fl :6c), 6) EA 01, 60- 60-16q: 601 (0 co CY) (D (D (C) o) �go nco) 00 -t C) (D C): r- N N CN (N CD(D ') co CD "T C\j Lo Lo Lo Lo OD. rI 0') 0') 01010 CD CD C), C) 6-} 63, 6- 6,5-16-1 60} 6c)- 6r)- 69 6F} 61,* 6q: F� 6Pr 1 1 ka 61), 64 ! 6f3, ------ - - ---- CD C) i m CY) (Y) CO 0-) (Y) cy) 001 r- "ZT:,q CN C) CD 1 N; N C-4 q co! C\j N: N!i (9: C-q 0�, Oj 0i c6 oi 6 6 10 m 6!1 6 61: 61) 60- 61, 6M !1601, 6g Iii 69- 611, 6q I I I '' I! '! ! II I 6q co Imo' co 1 l a) a) G) v1 fn (n C:! -j to < c) Mn 1 10 i m 0 a) .0 O rn U) C)) W cu : co U) (J) 1 (1) 1 �p (L) 0 4a) ED (n m o =s Q) 0 , °� rr. Z�o w 0 s 0- 0 C) 0� � < Cj Lr) 00 c)) F— CL 1 0 CL r) 10- 1 a-, CL CL z CL I I I i Cl) 0 OD cu n 0) 0') o) 1 1 " M: 1 (3) Q) LO i C,,j 1� C\l C\l 00 00 m cy) CD CY) CO C� Cl) Cl? C� C� co 00 N O O CO, T LO LO LO LO 0) Lo Lo 1 Lo Lo LO L6 i (D CD CD r- ti r-, N 06 ii T ffl Zi Go� 60- 6r 61), 61) 61)' vy 69_: 61), 61)' 61), 61) u), 6,k 1 61) 6'), 6p,: u) (r)! O 't 'IT Cl NT 4z3- M Lo Lo Lo m CY) 00 00! M 00 CC) m C D CD 11 CD CD C� (.0 c) 1: (z) cD c) cy) i- r-- r-- 00 64 C-4 C,4 (c) u? 17 LL CIS jq ,zr 4- �q LO LO LO CO CO CO CO 11: r-� r-.� rl- Ir- 1 a i- f (.P, 6-t 6- to f1l3 61) 61> 6c3 61) 60- 6q: 61Y 69- 69.,61) 69� 61> 6,)- 6.,! C0 CD m 0-) 0.) 0.) 0) CD CJ! 0) 0) 0-) LO m 00 co 00 co CO 0-) 0-) 0-) C) co: Cl) (o (01(o (D to co co co (Y) r_� 00 OD 001 (D,(_O CO w C,� CY3 yi � cl� CY5 cyi LO LO I LO LO LO (o (D t- (;F� 60,160-1 (fl ,! 61Y 60- 613- 60- 6 6c). 6ck 6,)- 6ck: CY) 00 0 (0: (D (D (D: 'T T 'T, -,t m (Y� co c 00 00 oo 00 0 C) C) C� C) co t-: C, Y� C? c? CP I C'� CO 7 CY) 1 L6 co co cy) c "q 14- ;T L6 Lo i Lo Lo CO CO CO CO CO r- 69-1 1 PIT r i r T T, Vy 60 60 69 61)-: 6e, 6o- 16-" 61�� co M cy) co CD, m 0-) m 0-) 0): Lo 1 (14 NI N CY) OC) 00 00 00 00 G) r- C) C) Cy 7 Cl CD CO CD CO CD CO CO (q C� CY), 00 00 OD 00 CN = CO (N (y) m (y) c) co 06 C6 cyi M m 14- -T LO L6 Lo' I Lo Lo L6 Lo, Lo, CO :(6 T 61), UY 6'. 6,)- v), 69- 6-� 6,)- 6o, 6-, 16,)-: (9 (4 614 60� C\l C\j 11 C141 I(Y)1 (.0 (D COCOA (3) Lo Lo C-4: cy) cy) cy) 0') 00 _1 �q C, m n co CY), (D C) t- Nq� N cyj co M(o co (Y) Lo Lo Lo Lo Lo LO as I Zp 60- 69- Vy U). v), vD, v), 6,:) f)lx 69, 61) 61), 69, 1 69 U) 6,9, v) vy 61) q� 1 0-) 0) cy.) Lr) C\j C-4 C-4 C-4, 0) co! C\J CY) (Y) CY) CO : C) co cy) (D co r- C� C� C� C� C,� cq 1.0 LO, LO ;7� Cf3 (fl 61), Y)l 60- F Ea 1 61) 69-; (fit 60- 69-, 6q 6n, 6,)- l6c : 6- 6­16-, 6A 60- v) cu CL > a) U) C) U) m -0 M .— (1) i i M :0 a) (D c E p (3) CY) 13) cm M -d! CU C: M CD co 43) (U x (D (n 0 10) i <: E! 1 LJJ C3) :3 (U C: _j cul c co (ul 0 C: J (1) a E =3 (u Elc a) 0 10 0 0 wj CY _r ry _r,< la_�o CL O U) 0 G)l ai S co 'T r, 00 m C) M L2 �2 04 C\l (N cli C14 C", (1 10 CL 10- n Lg�_z CL Cl) O cS co 0 co N IL 00 : LO (Y) M (0, 6) 001 M: 00 M 0 CY) 1 00 Vr 06 ii 6 i 6 6 6 C'� Oly 61�� (N 61� (N 60� (141 6-t: IN 6- N 69- (N CD Lp CY) 100" CO 'IT "'T 00 Cl? co co (.0 cp 06, co 07 �6� CD C,4 (N N 64, 60 U), 6c), UY 69- 69- I,— N 00 LO CY) co ,q (C) 0') 'T 00 cy): 00 cy) 100 Cl) u J LL r-�: 06 :06 a7 C-) (14 (D N cq 160- 60� 60� :61) , M I` N 00 LO co (Y) "I. Lq I-- i w 00 CY) Ml 00 (Y) OD C 04 i CN 6,f C) C,7) U? r-- C� N 100 C� CT M Cl� M 1 CY? rl- :00 00 CY) i 6) CD 16,> a 6A 69)- 01, 61), 61!> 6-, 69� m C) M t- C14 --4- i 00: LO m 1 7 o) co m r — co 00 0-) 6 col : 0) CD CY) r— C14, 00 LO: N CO r LSD 0) T Oo CY) (D rn ly" M (Al (3) .0: a) W CD cu 0- U) 0 a) E LNO (C'04 ONO o'), C) Cq C', cl-1-4 1 N cy) c) co 10-1 w z 0- 0- CL CL a- 0- 0- co 0 co N IL 'IT "T CD 010 r- CIJ I " — : i (N 100 CD 1 CD CD : = i i cy) cy) 1 co co (01 (j) C3) LO LO I- CD CD C co Co (D 1 C-� C-� CI5 co, co, CI5 co, co, rY r--� r--� t--� C�! (D (D CD (D CD CD C,� C-� N 60� 69- 69. 00 00 'IT It C) rl- r- �.q CD N N CY) CO (D I- 0) 0) CIJ LO: 00, co OC) r- (- r- Il CD m �cy C� CN: CD c (D (D N N: N N MI C6 1 M. 6ry 61), 611, U) 61f: 60- 69- 60� 61) 1 61> 6-k 6-- 613,: 6c, 6c� 61) 60- 613' 61) 61.� 61� ta v), (N 1 (,A � " ; — � (D I � co co : OD F-) � IC-D � 01--) im- � I q � i I- CD 0 1 CN Lq LI? W C516 61 616 j6 61 —j— 041 C\I C\J N i co CY) 69 L) cc): C) c) "T N C) C)! c) C) r CI4 cli 1— CN CN CIJ CN CN O I C-� C'� Lr) 0x0 11- 11- CD C) C) 60- 69 64: 69 6ci 69 1 60} 6ct 0) 6-1 v)- u> 16,)- 6o, 6o'; 6,) 6,). (D' 00 100 'T ""T -TCD r- —tl-r-- Cj --- I co I i 0c) 'T qT 1-- 0-) m (n I C\I Lr) co "T CR' I CD C) C) (D C) C) 1 C) cl� C* (N 69. 00: C)! C) C) t'- CD 0 00 ri=l LO LO co : NN 6= 6-j 6,>! �, 6,> 6-k, 6c)- 6c) : 64 CD CO "T CD 1-: ,T qT -�4- .q- C-4 f- M C'� L.0 1100100 CD C) C) (q (fl -'1., 61). Efl (f}', :6,> oo' (� u)- 64 H-}',, 69- o') Cl) m -C co 0 > > 0 Cu 1 U) cli a): Q) Ln (D U) (n (D I — m M 1):.(/) M ! : W U) < cu c (3) XI= 0 _j : < 0, M < C) C) _0 cz o m 0� 0 UJ cu I:a5) cu of <! cl (/) 0: C) a) a) cl) (n Q) -:3 a) CL; - !o i: C) i C) lo� 75 i or- < lu- m lo� z lo� 0 cli (D i(D L, co CL 0- CL z IL 0 n T 010 010 0' Lo NiNIN N 0 CO, 001 �0 0;0� OI M M�MIM' I� N 0 M i M M co CM d' ( 00 N CO CO C0 r LO LO Lo LO 11 O CI (� �t C 1 4 d d d L() Lo Lo Lo ILO LO M ! Cfl CO CO ti ti M r r1r r r rl r r r:r r r r r (r r r r r r r r. r r E$ 6,)- - ffl uy 6q �! Cf} : Ef} EA K} EA Efl lf} I ff}' K} . (f} EA fR (f} : ffl- . H, 6-k 1614 !� H-} N 0 O1O O O O M -rte' �� N --- ! -r C)� � -I -- ( M 00�00� 0 !O O CD C) �M 1� CO � r d 00 N N COI 0 LL CO It d d �T rt 'IT LO Ln LO i ' CO Cfl CO j Cfl t.- t-- le ti I` I` 1 it r';r r r r. rI r r r r jr r r r r r� r �r�r rIr r !r Cfl- Efl E ff 69 fA 64 i 160- Efl EA' ER ff} .. Efl'' fl � (,q 6)- Efl Vy 6k � � co CO CO 0 CO M O CO. M M L — 00 N; CO CO r 0 0 0 O M Lo Lo � co 00 M 0 0 0 0 iM W C6: M M M I (y): d CP IT d LO Loy LO i LO Lo CO (D (D CO I CO is I� r r -rIr i t r i r r� r r i r r� rIr r r � rIr rIr 4 r r 6" Ef} EA Pf} 61), Efl 1 Cfl l Efl cfr l Efl Ef3 c�3 EA Ef} 6.3 6 ed} Et} - c�' co oIo 0 oII m - _ NI COI M mco °m v N°°� ° f o 0 �' 0 OO ° o ° � O� M M LO 4 r M Cl) m M 1d ct �1 d Lf> L(1!�' LO M'COM CO M r, r r r r r r r r! r =, rIr - r r` r r r r r CF} C{} Efl E/} Efl = Kq Z Y s Efi 61) to C!-} Et} EF} fA 64 Efi Ef3 = fi Et} ( q _: -- -. 0 q 0) LO 1 N 1 N j N' - O OIO O'O 0 0 M M�M CO 0` d CY) 00IM 00!00 M 0 I � M CO ' tO I C0 � O I M I� r l r , r � 00 00 00 OO I '' N� CO V N' M °M M M�M M M M C6 cyi d � q LO�LOILO; �lOi DLO � LA�LO� CO CO r r i r r r r r r r' r r . r ; r r r r r Efl ER �} EA I oc. t � � ; to I EJY ER I Ei} EA � cfl EA � ; Ef} (fl . � 6 [fl :' Efl 61> S EA � �iN NIN !, MM M'M O 0 i r N co (o CD CO COQ 0 d) 0; tf> Lf)Ln� N 0 0100 001 00 M' I, {°i rl v v �i 1� 00 N m N� N N N� M� MIM M M Cl) d ! �tl ��'d LO � M r l r r r r! r r 1 r� r r r r r r: r r r l r 6a Efl � 6-' vi Ef} ! ff} EA (Ef} Efl C{} ffl' tfl"I Efl' Ef} ER Ei-} K} fA 6i �' ffl' EF} - - - - -- T 1 OI r�r r�r r N �M M M M CO 0' �1 0 0 0, LO, N N�NiN 0 00 �cf It �T��1 : "1 �I—I O�OO O M COI O �MiM co I�f rir rtr c} �00 itl N! NIN N cli ',N co co, Cl) Cl) M M! ,-t-: r r (r { r ! Erfl 69- 6,) EA 61-> ! fA ER EA ffi C{} EA Efl 60- Vfl Cfl 6p c Efi 69- 61Y Efl Ef} �1 � I ! 1 I ! i Cl) �" ` �I I ! I _ cv Vi C i U Ol C O, -0 Ln cn C N` V 'U� `�� 43 �� C7i'UI O FD N� 0 (LTA i� .� Q N �i ml U U= p: � � (lll � 10, � O C � (� Oi I 'Q� .� i I� Im CIv� Q f 1 in I ' ' l �LLz� �0 �° �� cn savZ azI 0 M I T Lo COQ 1-- 00 1 O I O r N JWM Z r1! d d d dl d, 0 1 ZI d M O N O � 1 1 1 � r , � 1 1 / T 010 010 0' Lo NiNIN N 0 CO, 001 �0 0;0� OI M M�MIM' I� N 0 M i M M co CM d' ( 00 N CO CO C0 r LO LO Lo LO 11 O CI (� �t C 1 4 d d d L() Lo Lo Lo ILO LO M ! Cfl CO CO ti ti M r r1r r r rl r r r:r r r r r (r r r r r r r r. r r E$ 6,)- - ffl uy 6q �! Cf} : Ef} EA K} EA Efl lf} I ff}' K} . (f} EA fR (f} : ffl- . H, 6-k 1614 !� H-} N 0 O1O O O O M -rte' �� N --- ! -r C)� � -I -- ( M 00�00� 0 !O O CD C) �M 1� CO � r d 00 N N COI 0 LL CO It d d �T rt 'IT LO Ln LO i ' CO Cfl CO j Cfl t.- t-- le ti I` I` 1 it r';r r r r. rI r r r r jr r r r r r� r �r�r rIr r !r Cfl- Efl E ff 69 fA 64 i 160- Efl EA' ER ff} .. Efl'' fl � (,q 6)- Efl Vy 6k � � co CO CO 0 CO M O CO. M M L — 00 N; CO CO r 0 0 0 O M Lo Lo � co 00 M 0 0 0 0 iM W C6: M M M I (y): d CP IT d LO Loy LO i LO Lo CO (D (D CO I CO is I� r r -rIr i t r i r r� r r i r r� rIr r r � rIr rIr 4 r r 6" Ef} EA Pf} 61), Efl 1 Cfl l Efl cfr l Efl Ef3 c�3 EA Ef} 6.3 6 ed} Et} - c�' co oIo 0 oII m - _ NI COI M mco °m v N°°� ° f o 0 �' 0 OO ° o ° � O� M M LO 4 r M Cl) m M 1d ct �1 d Lf> L(1!�' LO M'COM CO M r, r r r r r r r r! r =, rIr - r r` r r r r r CF} C{} Efl E/} Efl = Kq Z Y s Efi 61) to C!-} Et} EF} fA 64 Efi Ef3 = fi Et} ( q _: -- -. 0 q 0) LO 1 N 1 N j N' - O OIO O'O 0 0 M M�M CO 0` d CY) 00IM 00!00 M 0 I � M CO ' tO I C0 � O I M I� r l r , r � 00 00 00 OO I '' N� CO V N' M °M M M�M M M M C6 cyi d � q LO�LOILO; �lOi DLO � LA�LO� CO CO r r i r r r r r r r' r r . r ; r r r r r Efl ER �} EA I oc. t � � ; to I EJY ER I Ei} EA � cfl EA � ; Ef} (fl . � 6 [fl :' Efl 61> S EA � �iN NIN !, MM M'M O 0 i r N co (o CD CO COQ 0 d) 0; tf> Lf)Ln� N 0 0100 001 00 M' I, {°i rl v v �i 1� 00 N m N� N N N� M� MIM M M Cl) d ! �tl ��'d LO � M r l r r r r! r r 1 r� r r r r r r: r r r l r 6a Efl � 6-' vi Ef} ! ff} EA (Ef} Efl C{} ffl' tfl"I Efl' Ef} ER Ei-} K} fA 6i �' ffl' EF} - - - - -- T 1 OI r�r r�r r N �M M M M CO 0' �1 0 0 0, LO, N N�NiN 0 00 �cf It �T��1 : "1 �I—I O�OO O M COI O �MiM co I�f rir rtr c} �00 itl N! NIN N cli ',N co co, Cl) Cl) M M! ,-t-: r r (r { r ! Erfl 69- 6,) EA 61-> ! fA ER EA ffi C{} EA Efl 60- Vfl Cfl 6p c Efi 69- 61Y Efl Ef} �1 � I ! 1 I ! i Cl) �" ` �I I ! I _ cv Vi C i U Ol C O, -0 Ln cn C N` V 'U� `�� 43 �� C7i'UI O FD N� 0 (LTA i� .� Q N �i ml U U= p: � � (lll � 10, � O C � (� Oi I 'Q� .� i I� Im CIv� Q f 1 in I ' ' l �LLz� �0 �° �� cn savZ azI 0 M I T Lo COQ 1-- 00 1 O I O r N JWM Z r1! d d d dl d, 0 1 ZI d M O N O Cl) O Cl) N C6 d t 1 � 1 1 1 1 Cl) O Cl) N C6 d ITEM NO. TO: Honorable yor and City Council Members 6 �pLDw`,L FROM: Michael Taylo hief of Police "/0* HL18 of A U THE ° DATE: July 2, 2014 SAN GABRIEL r Zoo VALLEY ^01 SUBJECT: ANIMAL CONTROL AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF Pp °�grFO �ANUPry� LOS ANGELES SUMMARY This report seeks City Council approval for a five (5) year agreement with the County of Los Angeles for animal control services for the City of Baldwin Park. FISCAL IMPACT Funding for this agreement, if approved, for FY 2014/15 through FY2018/19, would have an estimated yearly impact on the General Fund of approximately $126,111.00 per fiscal year. The cost of providing animal services fluctuates from year to year depending on the level of need in the community. The proposed FY2014/15 budget has allotted $145,800.00. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council approve the Agreement with the County of Los Angeles, Department of Animal Care and Control. LEGAL REVIEW The contract has been reviewed and approved as to form and content by the City Attorney. BACKGROUND The City of Baldwin Park has had a long - standing agreement with the County of Los Angeles to provide total animal control services. The current five (5) year agreement expires on June 30, 2014. The county service to the city includes patrols, kennel, animal shelter services, and license sales coordination. All services provided are billed to the City. Revenues realized from license sales offset the cost of the contract. Staff has reviewed the level of service provided to the City. The Police Department has been satisfied with the level of service and response times provided by the Los Angeles County Department of Animal Care and Control. Staff has contacted other animal control agencies and determined there are currently no other agencies who have the resources which can handle the level of service provided to the community. Staff received a letter from the County of Los Angeles Animal Care And Control on June 12, 2014, revising the 2014/15 bill'ng rates. Some services provided had a slight increase, while others had a decrease as shown in the chart Belo s Rate changes are as follows: FY13 /14 FY14 /15 Kennel Services- Dogs & Cats (Housing)- $17.68 $20.07 Kennel Services- Other Animals- $ 8.33 $ 9.95 Special Care- Housing /Observation- $21.21 $24.08 Dead Animal Disposal- $12.48 $12.84 Field Services- $81.25 $85.02 License Processing- $ 2.63 $ 2.45 License Field Enforcement Canvassing- $68.49 $67.34 The Department of Animal Care and Control estimates that so far the cost for all animal shelter services provided to the City for FY2013/14 to be as follows: Services provided $490,954.00 (estimated) minus fees collected $392,493.00 = Cost to City- $98,461.00. This is within the $167,123.00, which was approved in the FY2013/14 budget. Estimates for FY2014/15 are calculated using FY2013/14 service cost and fees collected. Keeping in mind that services fluctuate from year to year, Staff expects the actual cost will remain well within the budgeted $145,800.00 for FY2014/15. ATTACHMENTS LETTER- EXPIRATION OF SERVICES AGREEMENT NOTIFICATION. ATTACHMANT 13- DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES PROVIDED. ATTACTIME.l�TT C- FEE /(PICT ESTIMATE CITY - COUNTY MUNIPAL SERVICE AGREEMENT FY 2014/15 SERVICE LEVEL REQUEST Marcia Mayeda Director Animal Care Center (ACC) Locations Agoura ACC 29525 Agoura Rd. Aaoura, CA 91301 (818)991 -0071 Baldwin Park ACC 4275 N. Elton St. Baldwin Park, CA 91706 (626) 962-3577 Carson/Gardena ACC 216 W. Victoria St. Gardena, CA 90248 (310) 523-9566 Castaic ACC 31044 N. Charlie Cyn. Road Castaic, CA 91384 (661) 257-3191 June 12, 2014 Mr. Vijay Singhal Chief Executive Officer City of Baldwin Park 14403 East Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, CA 91706 nnnr Mr. (Zinrihn1- Q. COCNTY OF LOS ANGELES ANIMAL CARE AND CONTROL This notification is intended to provide information to client contract cities regarding the existing services Agreement which will be expiring June 30, 2014. The renewal services Agreement (enclosed) was approved by Board of Supervisor on May 27, 2014. The Department of Animal Care and Control (Department) is seeking your cooperation in executing the renewal services Agreement to ensure uninterrupted services within your jurisdiction. This nin%Al Anrinnminnt will be effective iinnn in-yint-iifinn of hnth par -FI-11 -1 --", . rties. Please review, execute this services Agreement, and submit to the Department by June 26, 2014. Downey ACC 11258 S. Garfield Ave. The renewal Agreement outlines the standard terms and conditions Downey, CA 90242 applicable to all agreements with cities requesting the services of the (562) 940-6898 Department. The Department will request each client contract city to Lancaster ACC complete the Service Level Request each fiscal year to be effective on the 5210 W. Avenue I first day of July. The Service Level Request will be referenced as Lancaster, CA 93536 Attachment A to the Agreement. A modified Service Level Request may be (661) 940-4191 completed during the course of the year if a special need arises or change in service level is required. The document provides the Department with an acknowledgement of planned services and allows for improved planning and deployment of resources. Upon agreement of both parties, the additions or deletions to services contemplated in a revised Service Level Request can be scheduled for implementation. "To Enrich Lives Through Effective And Caring Service" Mr.VijaySinghal June 12, 2014 Page 2 Upon approval, the executed services Agreement and completed Service Level Request form should be mailed or delivered to: County of Los Angeles Department of Animal Care and Control Administration — Contract Cities Attention Whitney Duong 5898 Cherry Avenue Long Beach, CA 90805 In addition to the services Agreement and Attachment A, a description of Department services (Attachment B) and FY 2014 -15 budgetary estimates (Attachment C) are attached for your reference. The Department, in conjunction with the County Auditor - Controller, has completed the development of its contract city billing rates for FY 2014 -15. The new rates are summarized on the first page of the Attachment A. These rates have been approved by the Auditor- Controller and will be effective on July 1, 2014. In our letter dated March 31, 2014, we advised the client contract cities regarding our revised methodology for calculating rates to capture the costs of providing shelter medicine care to the animals. In examining this methodology and other factors, the Department determined that this required further review and it would be premature to implement this methodology without examining other mitigating factors. Therefore, for Fiscal Year 2014 -15, we have continued using our current methodology to determine contract city billing rates. In addition, the Department will be hiring a consulting firm to review the billing rates and the methodology for determining those rates. If you have any questions, please contact me or your staff may contact Ms. Whitney Duong, Contract City Liaison, via email at wduon,g_@ animalcare.lacount . ov or (562) 256 -2412. Sincerely, (Alt MARCIA MAYEDA Director Attachments U C L R Q W J J o = C LU z _ Z U UJ , w � J a J Z W Z Q W Q J J ui 0 O > LL Q W O O Y Z Z O w a u z CL 0 J m in c 0 7 V O #' 'E Ln d ri } Ili E i bn v W C m m iE # V M } LL ID Q v 61 E N W h C O O (, O t E a O u C OD � C � m L to h Ol 00 ct f` V Ol m w m m co eT r, o w co N �q 00 W 1-0 r l0 ci m r1 n 17 10 N l N m N W LO O't N� <-1 y r N 1 <-1 � m, =i n -(n v v? v} v} if} in U c-1 O Ln r m H N 0) C �D N m i./1 H ,: W m cn N Ln W dt '� N d' eLni O m o 00 w o m d O 6l N H 0x0 � } LL E h W lD Ol N N <t m O1 N tV N I O d' IT Ln 00 N d' d' 0 00 H UD 00 N r- ll <-1 .-1 to to m Ol Ll V O N r tD O U' O1 O Ol to to W N c-i c-i M .-d O N r, m <-i N Ol k,O N m L ti LR 0a0 m m H H r, (,o m N V v N z to <N-I N _4 !n w w N N O U E U O v� +T+ O c N v O O V In V c r ` l m o r < 00 c i O 1 � � 1 m O 1 tJ 1 w � J y v 1 C � � O O I V � v Q i � > 1 Y E � 1 0 o v M Q N � O d ' N � i y J � m � � I vN + O O _1 N Q 1 a m � v N C, 1 1 N ' v CO J � � LL iE # # N N O W W = =o U y J C N cn m �o 0) w E N O W a N C v U J E U > Q � v � � N c E C @ C a N Z V = E u w a-� v N Q O Q Y N c c c a o o o v u c° S S U > J y = 3 N 4J r0 to N :1'' N E of U Z o m o E— c v c U O� Y Y N O U E U O v� +T+ O c N v O O V In V c r ` l m o r < 00 c i O 1 � � 1 m O 1 tJ 1 w � J y v 1 C � � O O I V � v Q i � > 1 Y E � 1 0 o v M Q N � O d ' N � i y J � m � � I vN + O O _1 N Q 1 a m � v N C, 1 1 N ' v CO J � � LL iE # # 148-M 419111 a I M MAN Me] I 9-Al I W: 4 NITJ Lei: &I W, XCI V: 1: 1 MA 11: 11,ti1 kyj fAl lit "Ailk H§ THE CITY OF Part One: Billing Rates for the Period July 1, 2014, through June 30, 2015 Kennel Services* Dog and Cat per day $20.07 Other animals per day $ 9.95 Observatir%n per tiny $24.x8 Dog license processing per license $ 2.45 Dead animal disposal per animal $12.84 Field Services per hour $85.02 Animal License Field Enforcement per hour $67.34 Liability Trust Fund (applied to Field Services and Animal License Field Enforcement hourly amounts only) 4% HOA.1058302.1 City of Baldwin Park Page 1 of 8 Part Two: Annual /Amended Service Request Approval Authorized Representative Authorized Signature (Printed Name) (Signature) Title Telephone Number Part Three: Annual Service Level Standard Shelter Services: Date Full Service - All animals acquired in the field, within the boundaries of the City or determined to have originated within the boundaries of the City, may be impounded at a County animal care center. Impounded animals will be vaccinated and provided medical care, food, and shelter. The animal's picture will generally be posted on the Department's website to assist residents in reclaiming a lost or missing pet. Residents may also visit the associated animal care center to find their lost or missing pet. The hours of operation of each animal care center are scheduled at the discretion of the Department. See Part One for the associated shelter services billing rates. Primary animal care center *: (Baldwin Park Animal Care Center) *The Department shall take reasonable action to shelter all animals at this location. There may be circumstances in which the Department must shelter animals at an alternate location. In general, such sheltering shall be temporary and animals shall subsequently be transferred to the primary animal care center. Contract cities are charged for the first five days of care for animals impounded within the city's jurisdiction. If an animal leaves our care earlier for any reason, cities will be charged based upon the actual number of days (1 -4). If an animal is redeemed, the redemption fees collected from owners will be credited to the city up to the maximum number of days that would otherwise be billed. The County assumes liability and disposition of these animals after five days with the exception of animals held as a result of a seizure or criminal case, abandoned animals, observation animals (quarantine), potentially dangerous or vicious dogs, and return to owner animals. HOA.1058302.1 City of Baldwin Park Page 2 of 8 Below are the kennel services maximum number of days billed and the description: HOA.1058302.1 City of Baldwin Park Page 3 of 8 Maximum number *Kennel Services Description of days billed Kennel Services: Stray or relinquished animals. 5 days Private Veterinarian: If the owner is unable to be located and the injury or condition is life threatening and the scene of the incident is not in the vicinity of a County animal care center, or if the medical staff at the animal care center are not 5 days available, the animal will be taken to the nearest private contract veterinarian. Cities will be charged for the private Contracted veteri,-Mrinn xt;�if (AIMA11 V101L. Observation Animals: Animal bite that causes any penetration of the skin by teeth which requires a bite report be taken and the animal quarantined. The animal will be placed 10 days in quarantine confinement and observed for ten (10) days minimum from the date of the bite at the discretion of the Department of Veterinary Public Health. Return to Owner Animal: The owner or person entitled to the custody of any animal impounded can redeem such 10 days animal by paying impound and boarding fees accruing up to the time of such redemption. Abandoned Animals: Hold at least fifteen (15) calendar days; determine whether the owner had an agreement with someone to care for the animal in their absence, post a Form 15 days 58 (Notice of Impoundment) at the premises for the owner if they return, and mail a registered or certified letter to the last address Special Intake: Confiscated, Court Case, Police Request, Unlimited days Owner Arrested, Potentially Dangerous or Vicious Dog HOA.1058302.1 City of Baldwin Park Page 3 of 8 Field Services: The County will provide the services set forth below in accordance with the provisions of the Los Angeles County Code, Title 10 - Animals, and all amendments, except as otherwise agreed to by the parties in this Service Level Request. VStandard Service Plan - Includes answering calls for service (24 hours per day, daily); dispatching or assigning field staff; and performance of duties in the field based on priority, location, and availability of staff. • Daily between the hours of (a.m./p.m.) and (a.m./p.m.) • Weekend days and holidays • Emergency Services - As needed • Humane Investigations and Prosecution - As needed Regular Business hour contact information: Department Name: Telephone: Address: Outreach and Enforcement Services: County will enforce the fees set forth in Los Angeles County Code Section 10.90.010 et seq. unless the City provides an alternate fee schedule approved by the City and provided to the County. Animal License Field Enforcement License Enforcement Services - Provides for dedicated staff to perform license enforcement activities (issuing new licenses, license renewals, collecting delinquency charges and other fees) in the field. V Authorized Animal License Enforcement Services o County and City shall subsequently agree to the time and scope of this service. ❑ No Animal License Enforcement Services • Note: All license enforcement revenue collected will be contributed toward offsetting the cost of services HOA.1058302.1 City of Baldwin Park Page 4 of 8 Animal Facility Licensing Animal Facility Licensing Services - Provides for dedicated staff to perform animal facility inspection and licensing to any lot, building, structure, enclosure, or premises for any animal related business or organization which is required to be licensed. The animal facility licensing staff inspects animal related facilities annually and when otherwise necessary, to ensure the health and safety of the public and animals. Businesses are provided a letter grade based on the results of the inspection. Animal facility licenses are generally valid for one year from the date of issue. The Department will inspect animal facilities and any revenues collected will offset services. ❑ Animal Facility Licensing o Licensing and Inspection/Grading Services ❑ No Animal Facility Licensing Clinic s) In addition to the vaccination and licensing services provided in all County Animal Care Centers, the city may request the following additional services in its jurisdiction by checking the annfirahle box(es 'V/Request County to provide 'Vurisdiction; if a vaccination clinic(s) is/are City also requests County to the vaccination clinic. HOA.1058302.1 City of Baldwin Park or arrange for vaccination clinic(s) in its requested by checking the box above, the provide personnel to license animals during Page 5 of 8 Part Four: License Information (required if the Department manages City licensing) Standard Licensing Services: License renewal notices are mailed or transmitted to the animal owner of record, the renewal and payment is received and processed annually on a fee per license basis. Licenses will be required before an animal will be released to a resident of a City participating in the Standard Licensing Services program. Fees from licenses collected will be redited to the City monthly in arrears. I ;7city has adopted the license fees outlined in Title 10 of the Los Angeles County Code /'Altered Dog $ 20 .00 - A Altered Cat 5.00 Unaltered Dog $ 60.00 Unaltered Cat $ 10.00 Senior* Dog $ 7.50 *Senior age is defined as 60 years. Delinquency Charge $ Equal to Amount of License Delinquency Charge applies after: 10 days Field Enforcement Fee $ 40.00 (licensing initiated in the field) ❑ City has adopted the following license fees: Altered Dog $ Altered Cat Unaltered Dog $ Unaltered Cat Senior* Dog *Senior age is defined as _ years. Senior* Cat Delinquency Charge $- Delinquency Charge applies after: _ days. Field Enforcement Fee $_ (licensing initiated in the field) Current license fees adopted by the City on 7 20 ❑ No Animal Licensing Services HOA.1058302.1 City of Baldwin Park Page 6 of 8 Spay/Neuter Trust Fund: The City may elect to contribute $5.00 per altered and unaltered dog licenses to the Spay/Neuter Trust Fund. The Spay/Neuter Trust Fund will allow the Department to offer a low cost spay/neuter program for the City's residents who wish to have their pets spayed or neutered but cannot afford the surgery. Once residents are qualified, Department staff will work with shelter clinics as well as mobile clinics to assist qualified residents in obtaining spay/neuter services in an area near them. Indicate preference by checking one of the following boxes: W/Participate in the mandatory Spay/Neuter Trust Fund ❑ No participation in the mandatory Spay/Neuter Trust Fund Part Five: Animal Regulations /Enforcement (required if the Department performs field services) The City hereby agrees to the enforcement of Title 10 as indicated below. Check one of the following boxes regarding Title 10 Enforcement. V/City agree to the enforcement of Title 10 with no exceptions ❑ City agrees to the enforcement of Title 10 with the following exception(s): HOA. 1058302.1 City of Baldwin Park Page 7 of 8 Records: Upon reasonable notice, the Department shall make available to authorized representatives of City of Baldwin Park, for examination, audit, excerpt, copy, or transcription, any pertinent transaction, activity, or other record relating to this Agreement. The City of Baldwin Park shall ensure such records are handled in a manner consistent with all applicable privacy laws and all related to public records, including, but not limited to the Public Records Act (Government Code § 6250 et. seq.). FE-'art Six: Contact In110mation Primary Contact Name: H L' L_ _F/J i 1- C Address: i'l 0 ( 't�jv I L�_ i� P ") - 91 W6 Telephone: 94) a. Alt. Telephone: E-mail: P,7,-rl) -r'i' 0'a I /� Alternate Contact Name: A( I �` / I /-I iZ L/ Address: _< /") /-I Telephone: (_) 2� Ltc---t- Alt. Telephone: (_) E-mail: L2 Z-14/4 VLL 2 819 1 b LL6 01212 'z" , --12/1-) WD: FY 2014-15 Service Level Request DR HOA. 1058302.1 City of Baldwin Park Page 8 of 8 CITY-COUNTY MUNICIPAL SERVICES AGREEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL CARE AND CONTROL AND CITY OF BALDWIN PARK PARAGRAPH RECITALS 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 TITLE ............................................................................ 2 AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE SERVICES UNDER 2 STATE AND LOCAL STATUTES .................................. ADMINISTRATION OF PERSONNEL ...................... 2 DEPLOYMENT OF PERSONNEL. ........ ..... _ ....... ____ 4 PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACT ............................... 4 INDEMNIFICATION .................................................. 4 TERM OF CONTRACT ............................................. 5 RIGHT OF TERMINATION ....................................... 5 X401 410,11 kyl PAYMENT PROCEDURES ....................................... 6 ENTIRE AGREEMENT ............. ............................... 6 SIGNATURES .......................... ............................... 8 CITY - COUNTY MUNICIPAL SERVICES AGREEMENT COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL CARE AND CONTROL AND CITY OF BALDWIN PARK THIS AGREEMENT is made by and between the COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, hereinafter referred to as County, and the CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, hereinafter referred to as City. RECITALS a. The City is desirous of contracting with the County for the performance of animal care and control functions described herein by the County. b. The County of Los Angeles agreeable to Yendering such services on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. c. Such contracts are authorized and provided for by the provisions of Section 56 -1/2 and 56 -3/4 of the Charter of the County of Los Angeles and Section 51300 et seq. of the Government Code of the State of California. 1.0 AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE SERVICES UNDER STATE AND LOCAL STATUTES 1.1 The County agrees, through the County Department of Animal Care and Control, to provide general animal care and control services within the corporate limits of the City to the extent and in the manner hereinafter set forth. 1.2 Except as otherwise specifically set forth in this Agreement, such services shall only encompass duties and functions of the type coming within the jurisdiction of and customarily rendered by the County under the Charter of the County and the Statutes of the State of California and under the municipal codes of the City. The County will provide services in accordance with the provisions of Title 10, Animals of the Los Angeles County Code, and all amendments thereto, except as otherwise agreed by the parties in the attached Service Level Request. 2.0 ADMINISTRATION OF PERSONNEL 2.1 The rendition of the services performed by the County, the standards of performance, the discipline of officers and staff, and the matters incident to the performance of such services and the control of personnel so employed shall remain with the County. 2.2 In the event of a dispute between the parties to this contract as to the extent of the duties and functions to be rendered hereunder, or the Page 2 of 8 minimum level or manner of performance of such service, the City shall be consulted and a mutual determination thereof shall be made by both the County and the City. 2.3 With regard to Sections 2.1 and 2.2, the County, in an unresolved dispute, shall have final and conclusive determination as between the parties hereto. 2.4 All City employees who work in conjunction with the County's Department of Animal Care and Control pursuant to this Agreement shall remain employees of the City and shall not have any claim or right to employment, civil service protection, salary, or benefits or claims of any kind from the County based on this Agreement. No City employee as such shall become employees of the County unless by specific additional agreement in the form of a merger contract which must be concurrently adopted by the City and County. To the extent the County provides the City with animal licensing services, City employees or their agents shall not perform any function related to the licensing of animals, including collection of license fees, penalties, or field enforcement fees, except as otherwise agreed to by the parties in the attached Service Level Request of other prior written agreement. Field enforcement fees will only be collected for services performed by employees of the County of Los Angeles Department of Animal Care and Control. 2.5 For the purpose of performing services and functions, pursuant to this Agreement and only frir the purpnce of giving official status to the performance thereof, every County officer and /or employee engaged in performing any such service and function shall be deemed to be a contracted officer or employee of the City while performing such service for the City, as long as the service is within the scope of this Agreement and in a municipal function. 2.6 The contracting City shall not be called upon to assume any liability for the direct payment of any County Department of Animal Care and Control salaries, wages, or other compensation to any County personnel performing services hereunder for said City. Except as herein otherwise specified, the City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnity to any County employee or agent of the County for injury or sickness arising out of his /her employment as a contract employee of the City. 2.7 As part of its compliance with all applicable laws and regulations relating to employee hiring, the County agrees that the County Civil Services Rules to which it is subject and which prohibit discrimination on the basis of non -merit factors, shall for purposes of this contract be read and understood to prohibit discrimination. Page 3 of 8 3.0 DEPLOYMENT OF PERSONNEL 3.1 Services performed hereunder and specifically requested by the City shall be developed in conjunction with the County Department of Animal Care and Control. 3.2 The City agrees to complete a Service Level Request form annually (Attachment A) and the level of service to be provided and contract sum shall be signed and authorized by the City and the County Department of Animal Care and Control or his /her designee and shall be attached to this contract as an amendment. 13 The City may request a change in level of service and complete an additional Service Level Request form and submit such form to the County Department of Animal Care and Control. The revised level of service to be provided and contract sum shall be signed and authorized by the City and the County Department Animal Care and Control or his /her designee and attached to this contract as an amendment to the level of service and the contract sum. 3.4 The City is not limited to the foregoing services indicated, but may also request any other services in the field of public safety, animal welfare, or related fields within the legal power of the Director of Animal Care and Control to provide. 4.0 PERFOR,v "A ":CE OF CONTRACT 4.1 For the purpose of performing said functions, County shall furnish and supply all necessary labor, supervision, equipment, communication facilities, and supplies necessary to maintain the agreed level of service to be rendered hereunder. 4.2 Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City may provide additional resources for the County to utilize in performance of the services. 4.3 Notwithstanding the foregoing, it is mutually agreed that in all instances where special supplies, stationery, notices, forms, and the like must be issued in the name of said City, the same shall be supplied by the City at its own cost and expense. 5.0 INDEMNIFICATION 5.1 The parties hereto have executed an Assumption of Liability Agreement approved by the Board of Supervisors on December 27, 1977, and /or a Joint Indemnity Agreement approved by the Board of Supervisors on October 8, 1991, and /or a revised Joint Indemnity Agreement approved by the Board of Supervisors on August 9, 1993. Whichever of these documents the City has signed later in time is currently in effect and Page 4 of 8 hereby made a part of and incorporated into this Agreement as if set out in full herein. 5.2 In the event the Board of Supervisors later approves a revised Joint Indemnity Agreement and the City executes the revised agreement, the subsequent agreement as of its effective date shall supersede the Joint Indemnity Agreement previously in effect between the parties hereto. 6.1 Unless sooner terminated as provided for herein, this Agreement shall be effective July 1, 2014, and shall remain in effect until June 30, 2019. 6.2 At the option of the Board of Supervisors and with the consent of the City Council, this Agreement may be renewable for successive periods not to exceed five years each. 7.0 RIGHT OF TERMINATION 7.1 Either party may terminate this Agreement as of the first day of July of any year upon notice in writing to the other party of not less than 60 days prior thereto. 7.2 Notwithstanding any provision herein to the contrary, the City may terminate this Agreement upon notice in writing to the County given within 9f) AnaM of ro^o;^+ of nnA in �ii^k �n oaiora4 +hie 4`rroomonf �knll VaJ UQYJ %Jl VI Aril �i tAI MAGI, UII%A 111 Jl1 VII Q11 Gv�iIn UIIJ /- IaJ.IGGIIIGIIL 0IIQ11 terminate 60 calendar days from the date of the City's notice to the County. 7.3 This Agreement may be terminated at anytime, with or without cause, by either party upon written notice given to the other party at least 180 days before the date specified for such termination. 7.4 In the event of a termination, each party shall fully discharge all obligations owed to the other party accruing prior to the date of such termination, and each party shall be released from all obligations which would otherwise accrue subsequent to the date of termination. 8.0 CONTRACT SUM 8.1 The City shall pay for the services provided under the terms of this service agreement at the rate established by the County's Department of Animal Care and Control and approved by the Auditor - Controller. 8.2 The rates indicated in the Service Level Request form shall be readjusted by the County annually effective the first day of July each year to reflect the cost of such service in accordance with the policies and procedures for Page 5 of 8 the determination of such rate as adopted by the County Board of Supervisors. 8.3 The City shall be billed based on the service level provided within the parameters of the Service Level Request form. 8.4 The cost of other services requested pursuant to this Agreement and not set forth in the Service Level Request form shall be determined by the County's Department of Animal Care and Control and in accordance with the policies and procedures established by the County Board of Supervisors. 9.1 The County, through the County of Los Angeles Department of Animal Care and Control, shall render to said City within 15 days after the close of each calendar month a summarized invoice which covers all services performed during said month, and said City shall pay County for all undisputed amounts within 30 days after date of said invoice. 9.2 If such payment is not delivered to the County office which is described on said invoice within 60 days after the date of the invoice, the County is entitled to recover interest thereon. For all disputed amounts, the City shall provide County with written notice of the dispute including the invoice date, amount, and reasons for dispute within 15 days after receipt of the invoice. The parties shall memorialize the resol::tinn of the dispute ,n writing. For any disputed amounts, interest shall accrue if payment is not received within 60 days after the dispute resolution is memorialized. 9.3 Interest shall be calculated at the rate of seven percent (7 %) annually or any portion thereof, calculated from the last day of the month in which the services were performed, or in the case of disputed amounts, calculated from the date the resolution is memorialized. 9.4 Notwithstanding the provisions of Government Code Section 907, if such payment is not delivered to the County office which is described on said invoice within 60 days after the date of the invoice, or in the case of disputed amounts, from the date the resolution is memorialized, the County may satisfy such indebtedness, including interest thereon, from any funds of the City on deposit with the County without giving further notice to City of County's intention to do so. W111=01,21111001 UACUMUM "I 10.1 This Agreement and Attachment A hereto, constitute the complete and exclusive statements of the parties which supersedes all previous agreements, written or oral, and all communications between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. All changes or amendments to this Page 6 of 8 II Agreement must be in writing and mutually executed by authorized personnel on behalf of the City and the County. The Director of Animal Care and Control or his /her designee is authorized by the County to execute supplemental agreements. Page 7 of 8 CITY-COUNTY MUNICIPAL SERVICES AGREEMENT COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL CARE AND CONTROL AND CITY OF BALDWIN PARK IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County of Los Angeles Board of Supervisors has caused this Agreement to be subscribed by its Chair and the City has caused this Agreement to be subscribed on its behalf by its authorized officer. ATTEST: By City Clerk Date B City Attorney Date APPROVED AS TO FORM: JOHN KRATTLI County Counsel B Principal Deputy County Counsel COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES B MARCIA MAYEDA Director, Animal Care and Control 10 City of Baldwin Park, City Manager Page 8 of 8 Los Angeles County Description -. Field Services Attachment B Resources dedicated to providing quality animal care services in the field. Activities involve field officers performing a variety of tasks utilizing appropriate equipment. These tasks include: • Immediate response to vicious/dangerous animals that pose a public safety threat; • Capture and impoundment of stray domestic animals; • Impoundment of animals surrendered by their owners; • Removal of dead animals from public and private property; • Enforcement of all animal related ordinances and State laws including leash laws, animal cruelty laws, dangerous /vicious dog enforcement, and the keeping of wild or exotic animals; • Investigate Potentially Dangerous and Vicious Dog cases; prepare appropriate petitions; and conduct administrative hearings, consistent with state and county laws; • Rescue of ill, injured or abused animals; • Enforcement of animal nuisance complaints such as barking dogs and leash law violators; • Assist local law enforcement with their cases when animals are involved, such as the service of search warrants and impounding animals belonging to persons taken into custody; • Emergency response to fires, earthquakes, floods and other natural or manmade disasters to rescue animals from harm; • Maintain 24 hour dispatch and call center to receive calls for service and dispatch them to officers for field response; and Shelter Services Represents services dedicated to providing a comfortable and safe environment to shelter animals. Shelter services include: • Providing food, water, shelter medical care for impounded animals; • Holding stray animals and attempting to reunite them with their owners; • Finding new adoptive homes for domestic animals; • Working with wildlife rehabilitators to rescue sick and injured wildlife; • Providing emergency sheltering to animals displaced by wildfires or other disasters; • Spay and neuter services for all dogs and cats pursuant to State law • Performing surgeries to make animals more adoptable • Euthanizing sick, injured, dangerous, feral or un- adopted animals; • Quarantine and observation of animals for rabies; • File annual reports to the State of California as required bylaw; • Disposal of dead animals; • Maintain website of lost and surrendered animals so owners may locate their lost animals and potential adopters may find a new pet; and • Maintain regular hours of operation for the public. Licensing Represents resources for providing the issuance and processing of licenses. This function includes: • Issuance of animal licenses to animals that have been vaccinated against rabies; • Processing license applications, payments, and information changes; • Issuing license renewal notices; • Assessing and collecting fees, penalties and other financial remittances; and • Maintenance of animal licensing database Animal Licensing Field Enforcement Represents services dedicated to providing field enforcement for animal license compliance. This program includes: • Neighborhood field enforcement of animal licensing and other State and local laws and ordinances; • Issuing citations to violators of animal licensing ordinances; and • Collecting license revenue Business Licensing Represents the process to issue and enforce licenses provided to private businesses involved in regulated activities related to animals. This program includes: • Annually inspect and license animal facilities such as pet shops, breeders, animal menageries, grooming parlors and all other places where animals are maintained for profit or business activities; and • Issue grades to facilities, similar to the Los Angeles County Public Health Department's Restaurant Grading System Vaccination and Microchip Clinics Represents resources to provide vaccines and microchips, including: • Provide low cost vaccinations and microchips; • Staff with medical personnel and necessary support staff; • Assist jurisdictions in promoting community based clinics; and • Provide regular clinics at each Los Angeles County Animal Shelter ITEM NO. Y! P'`uwfti TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Hue ar •o J rHE 4� FROM: Daniel Wall, Director of Public Work�p) sAN OABR�EL DATE: July 02, 2014 boo I A L L. E Y aN �R�RgXEO �A��P "' SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2014- 023, ORDERING THE ASSESSMENTS FOR THE CITYWIDE PARK MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR FY2014 -2015 SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to outline the required Public Hearing and subsequent adoption of a resolution ordering the annual levy and collection of assessments related to the Citywide Park Maintenance Assessment District for FY2014 -2015 FISCAL IMPACT The District's anticipated revenue and expenditures are summarized in the following table: FY 2014 -2015 Beginning Fund Balance (July 1; 2014) $0 Estimated Revenues Proposed PMD Revenue, FY 2014 -2015 $690,000 City Contribution - General Fund, FY 2014 -2015 $182,000 Total Estimated Funds Available, FY 2014 -2015 $872,000 Projected Expenditures Park Maintenance and Operation $872,000 OH & Transfers In /Out $0 Total Projected Expenditures, FY 2014 -2015 $872,000 Ending Fund Balance (June 30, 2015) $0 PLAID revenue for FY2014 -2015 is anticipated to be $690,000 from assessments and another $182,000 from a General Fund Transfer. The total available funds are $872,000 which matched the estimated District cost for FY2014 -2015. The $182,0 0 General Fund Transfer is needed to cover the District shortfall and is included in the draft FY2014 -2015 B t. ' I N 1930 It is recommended that the City Council: Hold a Public Hearing, and after considering testimony, waive further reading, read by title only, and adopt Resolution No. 2014 -023 entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE CITYWIDE PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FY2014- 2015, AND AUTHORIZING THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY ASSESSOR TO ADD THIS SPECIAL ASSESSMENT TO THE PROPERTY TAX BILLS. LEGAL REVIEW Reviewed by City Attorney The purpose of the Citywide Park Maintenance Assessment District (PMD) is to serve as mechanism for the financing of operations and maintenance associated with City Parks. It is recommended that the City continue these parks maintenance programs and fund them through special assessments provided by the PMD. In 11 996, City of Baldwin Park property' ow'ner's approved the formation of a Park Maintenance Assessment District to financially support these programs, and the PMD' s formation was established in conformance with Proposition 218 On March 19, 2014 the City Council approved a resolution which authorized initiating the FY 2014 -2015 PMD and ordered the preparation of the Engineer's Report. Resolution No. 2014 -023 Engineers Report RESOLUTION NO. 2014-023 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE CITYWIDE PARK MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR FY 2014-2015, AND AUTHORIZING THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY ASSESSOR TO ADD THIS SPECIAL ASSESSMENT TO THE PROPERTY TAX BILLS WHEREAS, the City Council has previously ordered the formation of PARK MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FY 2014-2015 (hereinafter referred to as the "DISTRICT") pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" being Part 2 of Division 15, of the California Streets and Highways Code, and WHEREAS, the 1'�Iw (r%imril has adopted by Resolution Kin. 0014-001 �ILY �WU11�11 .1 Resolution I I �w �w I W�� approving the Engineer's Report pursuant to the Provisions of Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code and Article XIIID of the State Constitution, declaring it's intention to order the annual levy and collection of assessments, and giving notice of the time and place for a Public Hearing on the questions of the levy of the proposed assessments; and WHEREAS, the City Council has heard all testimony and evidence, and is desirous of proceeding with the levy of annual assessments for the District. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. That the City Council hereby orders the maintenance work performed on the District as set forth in the Engineer's Report for FY 2014-2015, and orders the annual levy and collection of assessment of the District as shown and set forth and described in said report and declaration of intention. SECTION 3. That the adoption of this Resolution constitutes the levy of the assessments for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2014 and ending June 30, 2015. SECTION 4. That the Los Angeles County Assessor, which collects assessments on the City's behalf, shall enter on the Assessment Roll the amount of the assessments, and said assessments shall then be collected and the net amount of the assessments shall be paid to the City Treasurer of the City of Baldwin Park. Resolution No. 2014-023 Page 2 of 2 SECTION 5. That the City Treasurer has established a special fund known as the "CITY OF BALDWIN PARK CITYWIDE PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FUND" into which the City Treasurer shall place all monies collected by the Tax Collector pursuant to the provisions of this Resolution. SECTION 6. That a certified copy of the assessment and diagram shall be filed in the office of the City Engineer, and a certified copy of the diagram and assessment roll filed with the Los Angeles County Assessor, together with a certified copy of this resolution upon its adoption. SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SS: CITY OF BALDWIN PARK 1, ALEJANDRA AVILA, City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2014-023 was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park at a regular meeting thereof held on July 02, 2014 and that the same was adopted by the following vote to wit: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972, PART 2 DIVISION 15 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE, ARTICLE XIII.D. OF THE CALIFO. °.NIA CONSTITUTION AND TH...0.. %OPOSITION 218 OMNIBUS IMPLEMENTATION ACT (GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 53750 ET SEQ) Prepared for vial-411501 I rrl,�c Prepared by: &ITURgre am o City mfBaldwin Park Citywide Park Maintenance Assessment District Page i :ffail livil - , RINM :111 Z*;z :4 -me :41 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2014-15 The Streets and Highways Code, Part 2, Division 15, Article 4, commencing with Section 22565, directs the preparation of the 8OOUG! report for each fiscal year for which 8SS8SSmeOtS are t0 be levied and COU8Cted to pay the costs Of the improvements described herein. SECTION DESCRIPTION PAGE ExecutiveSummary .......................................................................................... 1 Report-------------------------------------2 Part A- Plans and Specifications forthe|nmproxennentS-----------4 Part B-An Estimate of the Costs uf the Improvements ......... ........................ 5 Part C-A Diagram for the Assessment District ............................................... 8 Part [)- An Assessment of the Estimated Costs of the Improvements .... ...... 7 parkrepouw5dmn Comnnuniry, Ecwnaniic Sokytioas City of Baldwin Park Citywide Park Maintenance Assessment District Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of the Citywide Park Maintenance Assessment District is to generate revenues for the financing of the installation, maintenance and servicing of parks and recreational improvements, and certain facilities directly in support of such improvements and programs. Based on the provisions of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, Article XIII.D. of the California Constitution (Proposition 218), and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act, Baldwin Park property owners approved the formation of a Citywide Park Maintenance Assessment District and established assessments thereof beginning in Fiscal Year 1997 -98. In June 2002, the City was unable to obtain the necessary property owner approval to increase the assessment rates to cover the increased costs of park maintenance. Consequently, the General Fund has been subsidizing the differences between the actual cost and the revenue from the assessment. This report is pursuant to and in compliance with Articles XIII.0 and MILD of the California Constitution and the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. Based on the findings in this report, the assessment roll is generated wherein each Assessor's Parcel Number in the City of Baldwin Park is identified along with the amount assessed for the Park Maintenance Assessment District for Fiscal Year 2014 -15. The assessment roll is included as part of this report, but is not bound herein. For Fiscal Year 2014 -15, the Citywide Park Maintenance Assessment District is proposed to generate revenue of apprOXimately $674,000, while the cost of park maintenance is budgeted at $872,000. The difference of $182,000 will be covered by the City's General Fund. The City has made an effort to reduce this program's impact on the General Fund, and over the last several years the City has steadily reduced park maintenance costs. Four years ago, for example, the City's General Fund contribution was $232,000. The General Fund contribution is for general benefits and is not assessed. The proposed Fiscal Year 2014 -15 assessments are 1.04% higher than last year based on the CPI adjustment allowed by the Citywide Park Maintenance Assessment District during its formation. DISTRICT FINANCIAL SUMMARY FY 2014 -15 Beginning Fund Balance (July 1, 2014) Estimated Resources Assessment District Revenue + Delinquencies FY 2014 -15 City Contribution - General Fund, FY 2014 -15 Total Estimated Funds Available, FY 2014 -15 Projected Liabilities Park Maintenance and Operation OH & Transfers In /Out Total Projected Liabilities, FY 2014 -15 ected Ending Fund Balance (June 30, 201 $0 $690,000 $182,000 $872,000 $872,000 $0 $872,000 $0 parkreport1415draft Conirminity Economic o iifib City of Baldwin Park Citywide Park Maintenance Assessment District Page 2 FISCAL YEAR 2014 -15 CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ASSESSMENT ENGINEER'S REPORT PREPARED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 SECTION 22500 THROUGH 22679 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE Whereas the Council of the City of Baldwin Park, California, did, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, adopt the Resolution of Initiation ordering the preparation and filing of the Assessment Engineer's Report in accordance with Chapter 1, Article 4 commencing with Section 22565. Section 22567 directs that the report shall refer to the City of Baldwin Park Citywide Park Maintenance Assessment District (the "Assessment District ") by its distinctive designation, specify the fiscal year to which the report applies, and, with respect to that year, shall contain all of the following: Part A - Plans and specifications for the improvements. Part B - An estimate of the costs of the improvements. Part C - A diagram for the assessment district. Part D - An assessment of the estimated costs of the improvements. A preliminary report is then filed with the City Clerk in accordance with Section 22623 for submission to the legislative body. The legislative body may approve the report as filed, or it may ,i,odi y the report and approve It as modified. I Ilow, therefore, t,le foiiom,ig Assessment Engineer's Report is hereby submitted consisting of five (5) parts as follows: PART A: PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS This part contains the plans and specifications which are required to show and describe the existing and proposed improvements in accordance with Section 22568. The plans and specifications need not be detailed, but shall be sufficient if they show or describe the general nature, location, and extent of the improvements. If the assessment district is divided into zones, the plans and specifications shall indicate the class and type of improvements to be provided for each such zone. The Plans and specifications for the improvements listed in Part A are on file with the City Engineer. Such plans and specifications are incorporated herein by reference. PART B: AN ESTIMATE OF THE COSTS OF THE IMPROVEMENTS This part contains an estimate of the costs for maintenance of the improvements within the District for Fiscal Year 2014 -15 pursuant to section 22569, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith. This estimate is on file with the City Engineer. The estimate of the costs of the improvements for the fiscal year shall contain estimates for all of the following: (a) The total costs for improvements to be made that year, being the total costs of constructing or installing all proposed improvements and of maintaining and servicing all existing and proposed improvements, including all incidental expenses. (b) The amount of any surplus or deficit in the improvement fund to be carried over from a previous fiscal year. (c) The amount of any contributions to be made from sources other than assessments levied pursuant to this part. (d) The amount, if any, of the annual installment for the fiscal year where the legislative park reportl415draft Community, Economic Solutions City of Baldwin Park Citywide Park Maintenance Assessment District Page 3 body has ordered an assessment for the estimated cost of any improvements to be levied and collected in annual installments. (e) The net amount to be assessed upon assessable lands within the assessment district, being the total improvement costs, as referred to in subdivision (a), increased or decreased, as the case may be, by any of the amounts referred to in subdivision (b), (c), or (d). This part incorporates, by reference, the "Assessment Diagram ", which is a diagram of the Assessment District showing the exterior boundaries of the Assessment District and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the Assessment District in accordance with Sections 22570 and 22571. The diagram for an assessment district shall show (a) the exterior boundaries of the assessment district, (b) the boundaries of any zones within the district, and (c) the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the district. Each lot or parcel shall be identified by a distinctive number or letter. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land shown on the diagram shall conform to those shown on the county assessor's maps for the fiscal year to which the report applies. The Diagram has been prepared and is on file with the City Engineer. The Assessor's maps and records are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report. PART D: ASSESSMENT OF THE ESTIMATED COSTS OF THE IMPROVEMENTS This part contains an assessment of the estimated cost of the improvements on each Li liteU lot or parcel of land within the Assessment District in accordance with Section 22572. The assessment shall refer to the fiscal year to which it applies and shall do all of the following: (a) State the net amount, determined in accordance with Section 22569, to be assessed upon assessable lands within the assessment district, which shall include an amount sufficient to pay the principal and interest cJl 1.7 i,.le during the IIJcQI year from each 1 par liel of ii any bonds or notes issued pursuant to Section 22662.5. (b) Describe each assessable lot or parcel of land within the district. (c) Assess the net amount upon all assessable lots or parcels of land within the district by apportioning that amount among the several lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the improvements. According to Section 22573, the net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. PART E: PROPERTY OWNER LIST & ASSESSMENT ROLL This part contains a list of the County of Los Angeles Assessor's parcel numbers, and the net amount to be assessed upon benefited lands within the Assessment District. parkreportl415draft orninunit) t ra"Conomic sohundons City of Baldwin Park Citywide Park Maintenance Assessment District Page 4 PART A PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS The facilities, which have been constructed within the City of Baldwin Park, and those which may be subsequently constructed, will be operated, serviced and maintained as generally described as follows: DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK CITYWIDE PARK MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2014 -15 The items that may be funded through the District are defined in the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the Act) as Improvements. The Act defines Improvements to include the installation, maintenance and servicing of several types of landscaping and park and recreational improvements and facilities as shown below. However, the District can only assess for the special benefit that can be shown to be conferred from these improvements to the properties in the District. Installation • The installation or planting of landscaping. • The installation or construction of statuary, fountains and other ornamental structures and facilities. • The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water, irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities. • The installation of park or recreational improvements, including, but not limited to, land preparation, such as grading, leveling, cutting and filling, sod, landscaping, irrigation systems, sidewalks and drainage; lights, playground equipment, play courts and public restrooms. • The acquisition of land for park, recreational or open -space purposes. • The acquisition of any existing improvement otherwise authorized. Maintenance Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of any improvement, including: • Repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. • Providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury. • The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste. • The cleaning, sandblasting and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti. Servicing Servicing means the furnishing of electric current, or energy, or other illuminating agent and water for the irrigation of any landscaping, the operation of any fountains, or the maintenance of any improvements. Plans and specifications of the improvements within the District are on file in the office of the City Engineer and are incorporated herein by reference. Maps showing the location of parks within the District are on file in the office of the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference. parkreport1415draft Community Economic Solutions City of Baldwin Park Citywide Park Maintenance Assessment District Page 5 The estimated Cuot of the conatnuotion, operedon, servicing and maintenance of the innprnvarnenia for Fiscal Year 2014-15. as described in Part A, are summarized herein and described below. All costs include administration and utilities where applicable. CITYWIDE PARK MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FY 2014-15 Budget FY2Oi4-1S Beginning Fund Balance (July 1.ZO14) $U Estimated Revenues Assessment Revenue FY2014-15 $680.000 General Fund Contribution FY2O14-15 $182.000 Total Revenue $872.000 Total Estimated Funds Available, FY 'IfIl A 11 FY2U1445 Projected Expenditures Park Maintenance and Operation $872,000 Total Projected Expenditures, FY 2014-15 $872,000 FY 2014-15 Operating Reserve / Deficit $0 Projected Fund Balance S/3O/2O15 Beginning Fund Balance $O FY2O14-15Revenues $872.000 FY 2014-15 Expenditures $872,000 Projected Fund Balance 6/3O/201S $D The 1072 Act requires that o special fund be Set-up for the revenues and expenditures of the District. Funds raised by assessment ahoU be used only for the purpose as stated herein. A contribution to the District by the City may be made to reduce oosesSrnante. as the {|hv Council deems appropriate. Any balance or deficit remaining on July 1 must be carried over to the next fiscal year. narxrevmnwsdraft Commiinity, E:conomic Sohitions City of Baldwin Park Citywide Park Maintenance Assessment District Page 6 DISTRICT PART C A DIAGRAM FOR THE ASSESSMENT The diagram of the Assessment District showing the exterior boundaries of the Assessment District and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the Assessment District is required in accordance with Sections 22570 and 22571. Each lot or parcel shall be identified by a distinctive number or letter. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land shown on the diagram shall conform to those shown on the county assessor's maps for the fiscal year to which the report applies. The City of Baldwin Citywide Park Maintenance Assessment District includes all parcels of land within the City's corporate boundaries. Reference is made to the Los Angeles County Assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of all parcels within the District. A map showing the exterior boundaries of the District is on file in the City Clerk's Office and incorporated herein by reference. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County of Los Angeles. The Assessor's maps and records are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this report. parkreport1415draft Corn `d' unif' Economic or11ution City of Baldwin Park Citywide Park Maintenance Assessment District Page 7 PART D ASSESSMENT OF • OF -• Section 22573 of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2, of Division 15 the State California Streets and Highways Code, states that, "the net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." As the assessments are levied on the basis of benefit, they are not a tax, and therefore, are not governed by Article XIIIA of the California Constitution. As a result of the passage of Proposition 218 by voters on November 5, 1996, Articles XIIIC and XIIID have been added to the California Constitution. The new procedural and approval process outlined in these Articles applies to new assessment districts and increased assessments. In addition, properties owned by public agencies, such as a city, county, state or the federal government, must now be assessed by law unless it can be demonstrated that they receive no special benefit. Specifically, the assessment methodology for the Citywide Park Maintenance Assessment District will have to: ■ Demonstrate special benefit to assessed parcels over and above the benefits conferred on the public at large: "Special benefit" means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public of urge. General enhancemenI of property value does not constitute s-pe cial b enent. Separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred to parcels: "Only special benefits are assessable, and an agency must separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel." ■ Determine the special benefit that should be attributed to public agency parcels within the new District boundary: "Parcels within a district that are owned or used by any agency, the State of California or the United States shall not be exempt from assessment unless the agency can demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that such publicly owned parcels in fact receive no special benefit." The District assessment is based on land use such that property owners are assessed in proportion to the special benefits received. The land uses defined below are descriptive of all parcels expected to exist in the City of Baldwin Park in Fiscal Year 2014 -15. In the event there is a question regarding the land use designation of any parcel in the District, the City Engineer will be responsible for administratively assigning one of the land uses listed below. parkreport1415draft Community Economic SolvitP "his City of Baldwin Park Citywide Park Maintenance Assessment District Page 8 TABLE 1— FY 2014 -15 LAND USE DEFINITIONS Land Use Code Land Use Description SFR Single family residential parcels CONDO Condominium or town home parcels MFR Multiple family residential parcels (2 dwellings or more) MH Mobile homes or Mobile Home Parks NONRES Commercial and industrial parcels INSTITUTION Institutional — Parcels owned by non - profit organizations VACANT Parcels without a building or similar structure - designated for each land use GOVT 'Parcels owned by a public agency EXE Parcels exempt from the assessment, because they do not benefit from park maintenance (sliver, open space, common area, railroad, or utility easement parcels) SPECIAL BENEFIT ANALYSIS Articles XIIIC and XIIID of the California Constitution require that a parcel's assessment may not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. The Articles provide that only special benefits are assessable. The general benefits must be separated from the special benefits conferred on a parcel, a special benefit being a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on the public at large, including real property within the district. The general enhancement of property value does not constitute a special benefit. The Open Space Element within the General Plan for the City of Baldwin Park notes that the City is almost completely built out, and open space is limited to existing parks, school grounds, utility rights -of -way, and water channel areas. Within the City, over 530 acres of these properties are designated as open space. Baldwin Park offers five City parks and seventeen school playgrounds for recreation. In 1996, Morgan Park underwent a 2.5 acre expansion, where a new Community Center and Senior Center were built. In 2005, Barnes Park, located in the southwest quadrant of the City, was completely renovated and a 3,300 square foot recreation center was constructed. In 2008, the 15,270 square foot Arts and Recreation facility adjacent to City Hall was completely renovated, and the Senior Center underwent a 3,500 square foot expansion to create additional meeting space, restrooms and reception area. In 2009, new playground equipment was installed in Morgan Park and in 2010 that same play area was upgraded with recreation water features and public art amenities. parkreport1415draft Conimninifle, Economic colu h .'ns City of Baldwin Park Citywide Park Maintenance Assessment District Page 9 Morgan Park offers the most activities of any recreation area in the City, including boxing, horseshoes, basketball and volleyball. Morgan Park is centrally located; with the other City parks located south and west near the City's periphery. The area north of Los Angeles Street contains six elementary school sites, but no parks. About 60 percent of Baldwin Park's City park area is located south of Ramona Boulevard. Baldwin Park's recreation facilities and parks are vital to the community, especially for the high - density residential developments, which do not provide adequate play areas for their residents. Upon full build -out, it is expected that the City will have a ratio of 3 acres of parks, including school areas, for each 1,000 residents. This ratio is well within the National Recreation and Parks Association recommended standard of 2.5 acres per 1,000 residents. The majority of the City's parkland is under the control of the Baldwin Park Unified School District, with the City controlling 10 percent of the total parkland. Parks and recreational activities are managed by the City of Baldwin Park through a division of the City organization. As such, all parks administration and planning are centralized while recreational activities are conducted on a community -wide basis to take advantage of existing park facilities. This approach promotes the parks as a system or network to be used on a Citywide basis, rather than on a service radius basis which may be more common in other jurisdictions. All of the parks and recreational facilities are equally accessible to all the properties in the District. The maintenance of parks and recreational Improvements provide a particular and distinct special benefit to parcels within the District. The desirability of parcels within the District is specifically enhanced by the presence of well- maintained parks and recreational facilities which are available for the use and enjoyment of residents, customers, clients, employees and visitors of the assessed parcels. The presence of properly maintained parks readily accessible to properties within the District means that the owners and visitors of the assessed parcels may enjoy the benefits of such improvements while avoiding the expense of privately installing and maintaining similar improvements. Only the parks summarized in this Report are funded through the District. The other open space areas that contribute to the open space element of the City are funded separately. The location of all the parcels in the District was found to be within 1 3/4 miles of at least one park, and 3/4 mile of at least one recreational facility in the District. Although some properties in the District are within 3/4 mile of more than one park, it was determined that residents cannot use the facilities of more than one park at one time, so the assessment rates are established at a uniform level throughout the District. In addition to providing opportunities for recreational use, the proper maintenance of park and recreational facilities improves the aesthetics of parcels within the District. Proper maintenance of landscaping reduces pollution and noise, provides for open space and the planting of otherwise barren areas, and reduces property- related crimes within the District, especially vandalism, through the removal and abatement of graffiti. The U.S. Department of the Interior, National Parks Service, in a publication of June 1984, concluded that, "An investment in parks and recreation helps reduce pollution and noise, makes communities more livable, and increases property value." All of the above benefits contribute to a specific enhancement of the quality of life and property values related to each of the assessable parcels within the District. parkreport1415draft Comr1mnify F orpotnic olwdi ng City of Baldwin Park Citywide Park Maintenance Assessment District Page 10 In addition, the operation and maintenance of the City's parks confers a particular and distinct special benefit upon assessed parcels within the District, as follows: • The proper maintenance of parks and appurtenant facilities specially benefits parcels within the District by improving the physical and visual environment and making the District area more desirable. • Parcels within the District are specially benefited when public infrastructure including parks are in place, safe, clean and well maintained. • The proper maintenance of parks by the District provides increased District -wide attractiveness to prospective buyers. • The desirability of parcels within the District is specifically enhanced by the presence of well- maintained parks which are available for the use and enjoyment of the property owners and the visitors of the assessed parcels. • Having properly maintained parks readily accessible to properties within the District means that the owners and visitors of the assessed parcels may enjoy the benefits of such improvements available for use while avoiding the expense of privately installing and maintaining similar improvements. • The proper maintenance of landscaped parks provides increased attractiveness of the District as a place to live, work and do business. • Spraying and treating of landscaping for disease and weed control reduces the likelihood of insect or weed infestation spreading to the landscaping located on properties within the District. GENERAL BENEFIT ANALYSIS In addition to the special benefits received by the parcels in the District, there are general benefits conferred on the public at large by the maintenance, operation and servicing of park and recreational facilities. Census data and socio- economic characteristics for the City of Baldwin Park would generally indicate a higher than average park usage by local residents. The higher densities and a greater number of persons per household as documented by census data would indicate a higher than average special benefit from the funded park improvements. Additionally, in higher density areas such as the District, the value of the open spaces afforded by parks is at a particular premium. However, parks and recreational facilities are an important part of any thriving community. The general benefit arising from the park and recreational improvements can be measured by examining the usage of the facilities by the public at large. Each park has been examined to determine the average number of registrations received by the Recreation and Community Services Department for individuals or teams from outside of the District boundaries. The percentage of out -of- district registrations to total registrations is used to determine that portion of the park budget related to general versus special benefit. City staff has determined that out -of- District registrations equal approximately 15 percent of all registrations. Thus, 15 percent of the assessment budget will be assigned as general benefit. In addition, the City has elected to contribute an additional amount over and above the 15 percent level in order to maintain assessments at approximately the same amount as in prior years. parkreport1415draft Comrnkinftpr onomiw Softmons City of Baldwin Park Citywide Park Maintenance Assessment District Page 11 The formula recognizes that properties have different levels of benefit depending upon the typical population associated with the type of land use. The formula considers these differences and fairly distributes the special benefit among all residential parcels and lots within the District. Each of the special benefits identified above in "Special Benefit Analysis" are considered to benefit each parcel in proportion to the typical population associated with the parcel's land use as reported by the City of Baldwin Park Planning Division. In order to establish the proportionate share of benefit from any one parcel of land in relation to the total benefit to the District, it is necessary to establish a benchmark to relate that one parcel to all others. This benchmark is called the Equivalent Dwelling Unit. The District uses a single family residence as the benchmark Equivalent Dwelling Unit. All other land uses, as represented on the County Assessor's master property file, will be compared to the benchmark of the Single Family Residence to gain a comparative Equivalent Dwelling Unit ( "EDU ") based on population data as found in the 1990 Census Data for Baldwin Park, as provided by the City of Baldwin Park's Planning Division. Following is a discussion of EDU values for each type of land use within the Assessment District. The EDU values for condominiums, multi - family and mobile homes are based upon a comparison of the average population per household for single - family residences versus the average � r_ household population in condominiums, multi - family and mobile homes. The calculation of each EDU value is shown below: For Single Family Residential: Single family population per household 4.06 Single family population per household 4.06 For Condominium Residential: Condo population per household 3.75 Single family population per household 4.06 For Multi - Family Residential: Multi- family,00pulation per household 4.25 Single family population per household 4.06 For Mobile Home Residential: Mobile Home population per household 2.03 Single family population per household 4.06 = 1.00 EDU's /unit = 0.92 EDU's /unit = 1.04 EDU's /unit = 0.50 EDU's /unit The EDU values for commercial, office, business and industrial land uses ( "non- residential ") are based on a comparison of the typical single family lot acreage versus the actual size of the non- residential use. Special benefit to non - residential parcels results from the use of recreational facilities by employees and customers, which generally increases in number as the parcel size increases. Therefore, the assessment on non - residential property is based on acres, as opposed to residential parcels which are based on dwelling units. Within the District, the typical single - family parcel size is 8,500 square feet. Approximately 20 percent of each acre of residential land, on average, is dedicated for streets and other public uses resulting in a net acreage available for the subdivision of approximately 4.10 lots per acre, which is park report 1 415d raft Cornrymnity Ecorpomic Soliitrion City of Baldwin Park Citywide Park Maintenance Assessment District Page 12 rounded down to 4 lots per acre. Therefore, using the single family residence as a base, an acre of non - residential property receives the same number of EDU's as an acre of residential property, that is, 4 EDU per acre. Non - residential lots (a) 4 lots per acre Single family EDU @ 1.00 per lot = 4.00 EDU's /acre Furthermore, non - residential parcels more than half an acre and less than an acre is assigned a minimum of 4 EDU per parcel to reflect the minimum benefit these parcels receive. Non- residential parcels below one -half acre are assigned 50 percent of 4.0 EDU's, or 2.0 EDU's per parcel. The EDU value for the institutional, church, school, college and day care land uses ( "institutional ") is calculated at one (1) EDU per parcel. This per parcel assessment rather than per acre assessment is in recognition of this land use category's traditionally lower demand for park facilities as indicated by the City's Recreation and Community Services staff. In addition, institutional parcels receive less benefit than other non - residential parcels in the District from the operation, maintenance and servicing of parks in the City for several reasons. Institutional parcels function differently than non - residential parcels in that they: 1) typically operate fewer days in the week, 21) generally have an inconsistent number of people using the facilities daily, and 3) have a less intensive use than the property size alone would indicate because in general, the institutional parcels in the District contain large green areas that function as open space. Therefore, the institutional parcels should be assessed at a lower level than the non - residential parcels, and are assigned 1 EDU per parcel. As a result of the passage of Proposition 218, the assessment methodology for the Park Maintenance Assessment District has to determine the special benefit attributable to public agency parcels within the District boundary. Section 4 of the Proposition states, "Parcels within a district that are owned or used by any agency, the State of California or the United States shall not be exempt from assessment unless the agency can demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that such publicly owned parcels in fact receive no special benefit." In comparison to non - residential and institutional parcels, governmental properties also benefit from the proper maintenance of parks, since such parks attract potential customers and employees as shown below. Certain governmental parcels benefit from the District because the proper maintenance, operation and servicing of parks: • reduces property- related crimes against properties within the District, especially vandalism, through the abatement of graffiti; • improves the aesthetics of public parcels through the proper maintenance of landscaping and the planting of otherwise barren areas; • reduces pollution and noise in surrounding areas throughout the provision of open space; and • by improving the physical and visual environment and making the District area a more desirable and attractive place to work and do business. Additionally: ■ Having properly maintained parks readily accessible to the public properties means that the public agencies may enjoy the benefits of such improvements available for use while avoiding the expense of privately installing and maintaining similar improvements; and park report 141 5draft Co#?nmiin lly Economic of ions City of Baldwin Park Citywide Park Maintenance Assessment District Page 13 ■ Spraying and treating of landscaping for disease and weed control reduces the likelihood of insect or weed infestation spreading to the landscaping located on public properties within the District. However, governmental parcels receive less benefit than other non - residential parcels in the District from the operation, maintenance and servicing of parks in the City. For instance, a portion of most public properties are used as park and /or recreation areas. This portion of these properties does not benefit from the District improvements because it provides the same use and function that the funded improvements provide. Additionally, governmental properties generally do not benefit from the resale value of their properties. Consequently, the specific benefit of increased property value that is conferred to other properties in the District is not conferred to governmental properties. Therefore, the governmental parcels are assessed at one - quarter the rate of non- residential uses, but as the size of the parcel increases, the benefit increases, and therefore, the assessment amount increases. The special benefit to undeveloped property in the residential, non - residential and institutional land use categories is based on the assumption that such undeveloped property benefits from the ongoing maintenance of recreational facilities because the facilities will be in good and ready condition in the future when the vacant property is developed. For the purposes of this Engineer's Report, the special benefit to undeveloped property is assigned a value corresponding to 40 percent of the developed property EDU values for the same land use designations. This discounted value recognizes the reduced current value due to the uninhab red nature of the property. Finally, parcels of raw land and homeowner's association common area are assigned an EDU value of zero (0), based on a projection that these parcels are likely never to develop and therefore will receive no benefit from the improvements. Similarly, railroad right-of-Way Parcels, public utility right -of -way and well site or reservoir site parcels, water rights parcels, and other similar land uses are also assigned an EDU value of 0, because of little or no possibility for residential or non- residential or institutional development and therefore no benefit. The following table sets forth the population per unit as shown in the 1990 City of Baldwin Park census data, the equivalent dwelling units as discussed above, and the resulting assessment amount per unit, parcel or acre. parkreport1415draft t -nnif nity Economic lijVons City of Baldwin Park Citywide Park Maintenance Assessment District Page 14 TABLE 2 -- ASSESSMENT FACTORS Land Use Description Population per Unit Equivalent Dwelling Units Assessment per Unit, Parcel or Acre Single Family Residential 4.06 /unit 1.00 /unit $33.54 /unit Vacant Single Family Residential -- - - - - -- 0.40/ parcel $13.42/ parcel Condominium 3.75 /unit 0.92 /unit $30.86 /unit Multiple Family 4.25 /unit 1.04 /unit $34.88 /unit Mobile Home 2.03 /unit 0.50 /unit $16.77 /unit Non - Residential > 1 acre 4.00 /acre 4.00 /acre $134.16/acre Non - Residential >.5 - < 1 arse 4.00/ parcel 4.00/ parcel $134.16/ parcel Non - Residential < .5 acre 4.00 /parcel 2.00/ arcei $67.08 /parcel Vacant Non - Residential > 1 acre - - - - -- 1.60 /acre $53.66 /acre Vacant Non - Residential >.5 - < 1 - - - - -- 1.60/ parcel $53.66 /parcel Vacant Non - Residential < .5 acre - - - - -- 0.80 /parcel $26.83/ parcel Institutional 1.00/ parcel 1.00 /parcel $33.54 /parcel Vacant Institutional - - - - -- 0.40/ parcel $13.42 /parcel Government > 1 acre 4.00 /arce 1.00 /acre $33.54 /acre Government > .5 acre - < 1 acre 4.00/ parcel 1.00/ parcel $33.54/ parcel Government < .5 acre 4.00/ parcel 0.50/ arcel $16.77/ parcel Exemption - - - - -- 0.00 /parcel $0.00 /parcel All parcels within the District benefit from the ongoing operation of the District. Therefore, all parcels assessed in the District receive a proportional share of the administrative costs for the District based on their assessment for park maintenance. ►A F_1X4 1 ► . ■ The Maximum Assessment is the annual assessment shown in the Assessment Roll, on file in the Office of the City Clerk and by this reference incorporated herein. Commencing with Fiscal Year 2006 -2007 and for each year thereafter, the assessment for the District is subject to an Annual Adjustment limit. The Annual Adjustment shall not exceed the change in the Consumer Price Index ( "CPI "), All Urban Consumers, for the Los Angeles- Anaheim - Riverside Area from March through March of the previous calendar year. Future annual assessments within this limit may be approved by the City Council without additional property owner ratification. These limits may be exceeded only with a majority property owner approval of either: 1) a supplemental assessment; 2) a revision of or supplement to the maximum assessment and /or adjustment formula, or 3) any other methodology amenable to the property owners within the District boundary. The assessor's parcel number and the amount of assessment upon each lot or parcel are shown on the assessment roll. Upon confirmation by the Council this data will be submitted to the Los Angeles County Auditor - Controller for the inclusion on the 2014 -15 tax roll. parkreport1415draft Comf n r, "cono `6` ic` S olinio =°s City mf Baldwin Park Citywide Park Maintenance Assessment District Page 15 PART E The 8SSeSSnn8nt oat forth for each parcel is shown on the ASS8SSnnent Roll for the Oiathot, submitted separately, as 'Y\oaeeannmnt Roll for City ofBaldwin P8Mh, Chvxvida Park Maintenance Assessment Diatrict, Fiscal Year 2014'15"' which is incorporated by reference herein and is on file in the office Of the City Clerk. The AnSeSSnn8nt Roll lists all porua|n within the boundaries of the District as shown on the Assessment Diagram, Part F herein, and on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of Los Angeles, which is by reference made part of this report. A list of names and addresses of the OvvnenG of all parcels within this District is shown on the last equalized Property Tax Roll of the Assessor of the County of Loa Ange|es, which by reference is hereby made a port of this report. This list is keyed to the Assessor's Parcel Numbers as shown on the Assessment Roll on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park. varxenmn415draft Economic Soh-itions rUnds"I I STAFF REPORT U U005 10 Ell I'Vil The purpose of this report is to outline the required Public Hearing and subsequent adoption of a resolution ordering the annual levy and collection of assessments related to the Citywide Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District, FY2014-2015 (LLMD or District) FISCAL IMPACT The District's anticipated revenue and expenditures are summarized in the following table: Street Lighting ............. ................ ................................................. ............ ................. - ............... ............ ......................................... ..................... $590,700 ............................... ................. ................ Landscaping ........... - ............................................. .......... - ...................... ..................................................................... - ....................... $840,000 ................................................ ........... .......... .......... Traffic Signals ................................................. ............. ........... ........... .......................................................... ............... ............... $285,000 ...................................................................................... ............................. ............. - Total Expenditures ............................................ ........................ .............................................. ........................... ......................... $1,715,700 .............. - ........... FY 2014-15 Operating Reserve / Deficit ........... -.1 ............... -1-11111 .................. -.- ............................................................... ........... - .......................... ............................ ................ $62,085 ............... ...................... ............. ......................... - Projected Balance 6130/2014 .......... - ............... ....................... .......... ............................................ ............ .............. - .................................... ..................... .............. ................. ........................................... Beginning Fund Balance 07/01/2015 .................................... .......... .................................... ........................................................................................................................... .............. $416,108 ............ ............................................................................ FY 14-15 Revenues $1,777,785 ...... ... .. .. ........... - .......................................... ........................................... 111 .......................... ............ .......... ................................................ ................ ........... ........................ FY 14-15 Expenditures ...................................... - .............. ... .................................. ...................... ............. .................... .......... ........... .................. - ........... ........... $1,715,700 .............. .......... ,Projected Fund Balance 06/30/2014 $478,193 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council: Hold a Public Hearing, and after considering testimony, waive further reading, read by title only, and adopt Resolution No. 2014 -024, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH CITYWIDE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENACE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR FY2014 -15, AND AUTHORING THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY ASSESSOR TO ADD THIS SPECIAL ASSESSMENT TO THE PROPERTY TAX BILLS." LEGAL REVIEW Reviewed by City Attorney :: . lT:Z�Iihl7 Over the last decade, the District has been utilized to cover the costs of providing maintenance and improvements to the street lighting, traffic signal, and landscaping operations in the public right -of -way. This typical assessment has remained for over twelve years. On June 18, 2014 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2014 -019 which approved the Engineer' s Report for the LLMD, declared its intent to levy and collect assessments, and set a date and time for the public hearing (July 02, 2014). The Public Hearing notice was posted as required. ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2014 -024 Engineer' s Report *011 Lei 11012 1e FTIF n rim A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE CITYWIDE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR FY 2014 -2015, AND AUTHORIZING THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY ASSESSOR TO ADD THIS SPECIAL ASSESSMENT TO THE PROPERTY TAX BILLS WHEREAS, the City Council has previously ordered the formation of LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. 2007 -1 (hereinafter referred to as the "DISTRICT ") pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" being Part 2 of Division 15, of the California Streets and Highways Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted Resolution No. 2014 -024 approving the Engineer's Report pursuant to the Provisions of Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code and Article XIIID of the State Constitution, declaring its intention to order the annual levy and collection of assessments, and giving notice of the time and place for a Public Hearing on the questions of the levy of the proposed assessments; and WHEREAS, the City Council has heard all testimony and evidence, and is desirous of proceeding with the levy of annual assessments for the District. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. That the City Council hereby orders the maintenance work performed on the District as set forth in the Engineer's Report for FY 2014 -2015, and orders the annual levy and collection of assessment of the District as shown and described in said report and declaration of intention. SECTION 3. That the adoption of this Resolution constitutes the levy of the assessments for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2014 and ending June 30, 2015. SECTION 4. That the Los Angeles County Assessor, which collects assessments on the City's behalf, shall enter on the Assessment Roll the amount of the assessments, and said assessments shall then be collected and the net amount of the assessments shall be paid to the City Treasurer of the City of Baldwin Park. Resolution No. 2014 -024 Page 2 of 2 SECTION 5. That the City Treasurer has established a special fund known as the "CITY OF BALDWIN PARK CITYWIDE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND" into which the City Treasurer shall place all monies collected by the Tax Collector pursuant to the provisions of this Resolution. SECTION 6. That a certified copy of the assessment and diagram shall be filed in the office of the City Engineer, and a certified copy of the diagram and assessment roll filed with the Los Angeles County Assessor, together with a certified copy of this resolution upon its adoption. SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 2 "d day of July 2014. N�� ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SS: CITY OF BALDWIN PARK I, ALEJANDRA AVILA, City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2014 -024 was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park at a regular meeting thereof held on July 02, 2014 and that the same was adopted by the following vote to wit: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ALEJEANDRA AVILA CITY CLERK A I ! a, mo PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972, PART 2 DIVISION 15 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE, ARTICLE X11I.D. OF 7 HE CALIFOR ^!IA CONSTITUTIO^! A,R ►D THE PRO.°OSITION 21$ O. ".41NIEUS IMPLEMENTATION ACT (GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 53750 ET SEQ) WIMMAMWif I A-5- -4 F *r R,, Prepared by: . FTelmn . T F7 ?A FTIM City mf Baldwin Park Citywide Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District CITYWIDE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2014-15 The Streets and Highways C0de, Part 2. [)iViSiOD 15. Article 4' CO[0D1enciDg with Section 22565. directs the preparation of the annual n3pO[t for each DSC@| year for which asS8SSOl8nt3 are to be levied and collected to pay the COStS of the inlpnDven1enƒS described herein. SECTION DESCRIPTION PAGE Report....................................................................................................... ....... 1 Part A- Plans and Specifications for[he|rnpr0vannan[o-----------3 PertB - AnEatima[eofthe Costs uf the Improvements .................................. 4 PnrtC - A[>i nannforU1eASSeeenoan[DisthCt---------------'5 Part [}'An Assessment of the Estimated Costs of the Improvements .......... 0 ongmvmn*15maft CommLinity Economic Solutions City of Baldwin Park Citywide Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District Page 1 Whereas the Council of the City of Baldwin Park, California, did, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, adopt the Resolution of Initiation ordering the preparation and filing of the Assessment Engineer's Report in accordance with Chapter 1, Article 4 commencing with Section 22565. Section 22567 directs that the report shall refer to the City of Baldwin Park Citywide Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District (the "Assessment District ") by its distinctive designation, specify the fiscal year to which the report applies, and, with respect to that year, shall contain all of the following: Part A Plans and specifications for the improvements. Part B An estimate of the costs of the improvements. Part C A diagram for the assessment district. Part D An assessment of the estimated costs of the improvements. A preliminary report is then filed with the City Clerk in accordance with Section 22623 for submission to the legislative body. The legislative body may approve the report as filed, or it may modify the report and approve it as modified. Now, therefore, the following Assessment Engineer's Report is hereby submitted consisting of five (5) parts as follows: PART A: PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS This part contains the plans and specifications which are required to show and describe the existing and proposed improvements in accordance with Section 22568. The plans and specifications need not be detailed, but shall be sufficient if they show or describe the general nature, location, and extent of the improvements. If the assessment district is divided into zones, the plans and specifications shall indicate the class and type of improvements to be provided for each such zone. The Plans and specifications for the improvements listed in Part A are on file with the City Engineer. Such plans and specifications are incorporated herein by reference. PART B: AN ESTIMATE OF THE COSTS OF THE IMPROVEMENTS This part contains an estimate of the costs for maintenance of the improvements within the District for Fiscal Year 2014 -15 pursuant to section 22569, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith. This estimate is on file with the City Engineer. The estimate of the costs of the improvements for the fiscal year shall contain estimates for all of the following: (a) The total costs for improvements to be made that year, being the total costs of constructing or installing all proposed improvements and of maintaining and servicing all existing and proposed improvements, including all incidental expenses. (b) The amount of any surplus or deficit in the improvement fund to be carried over from a previous fiscal year. engreport1415draft r t4 Amami. "; o,f omi l b,on, City of Baldwin Park Citywide Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District Page 2 (c) The amount of any contributions to be made from sources other than assessments levied pursuant to this part. (d) The amount, if any, of the annual installment for the fiscal year where the legislative body has ordered an assessment for the estimated cost of any improvements to be levied and collected in annual installments. (e) The net amount to be assessed upon assessable lands within the assessment district, being the total improvement costs, as referred to in subdivision (a), increased or decreased, as the case may be, by any of the amounts referred to in subdivision (b), (c), or (d). This part incorporates, by reference, the "Assessment Diagram ", which is a diagram of the Assessment District showing the exterior boundaries of the Assessment District and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the Assessment District in accordance with Sections 22570 and 22571. The diagram for an assessment district shall show (a) the exterior boundaries of the assessment district, (b) the boundaries of any zones within the district, and (c) the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the district. Each lot or parcel shall be identified by a distinctive number or letter. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land shown on the diagram shall conform to those shown on the county assessor's maps for the fiscal year to which the report applies. The Diagram has been prepared and is on file with the City Engineer. The Assessor's maps and records are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report. PART D: ASSESSMENT OF THE ESTIMATED COSTS OF THE IMPROVEMENTS This part contains an assessment of the estimated cost of the improvements on each benefited lot or parcel of land within the Assessment District in accordance with Section 22572. The assessment shall refer to the fiscal year to which it applies and shall do all of the following: (a) State the net amount, determined in accordance with Section 22569, to be assessed upon assessable lands within the assessment district, which shall include an amount sufficient to pay the principal and interest due during the fiscal year from each parcel on any bonds or notes issued pursuant to Section 22662.5. (b) Describe each assessable lot or parcel of land within the district. (c) Assess the net amount upon all assessable lots or parcels of land within the district by apportioning that amount among the several lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the improvements. According to Section 22573, the net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. This part contains a list of the County of Los Angeles Assessor's parcel numbers, and the net amount to be assessed upon benefited lands within the Assessment District. engreport1415draft Comuriurnly Erna or okftio:n�,a, City of Baldwin Park Citywide Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District Page 3 PART A PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENTS The facilities, which have been constructed within the City of Baldwin Park, and those which may be subsequently constructed, will be operated, serviced and maintained as generally described as follows: FOR OF THA PARK CITYWIDE LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR The proposed improvements include the construction, operation, servicing and maintenance of landscaping, traffic signals, street lighting and appurtenant facilities in public streets and public rights -of -way within the Assessment District; including but not limited to, personnel, electrical energy, utilities such as water, materials, contracting services, and other items necessary for the satisfactory operation of these services described as follows: Landscaping and Appurtenant Facilities Landscaping, planting, shrubbery, trees, irrigation systems, hardscapes, fixtures, sidewalk and curb and gutter maintenance adjacent to street trees, and appurtenant facilities, in public street and public rights -of -way, including parkways, medians and dedicated easements within the boundary of said Assessment District. Lighting and Appurtenant Facilities Poles, fixtures, bulbs, conduits, equipment including guys, anchors, posts and pedestals, metering devices and appurtenant facilities as required to provide safety lighting and traffic signals in public streets and public rights -of -way and easements within the boundaries of said Assessment District. Power for the street lights and traffic signals shall be furnished by the Southern California Edison Company or its successors and shall be adequate for the intended purpose. Rates for power shall be those authorized by the Public Utilities Commission, State of California. Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the landscaping, public lighting facilities and appurtenant facilities, including repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of the landscaping, public lighting facilities or appurtenant facilities; providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing and treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste; and the cleaning, sandblasting and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti. Servicing means the furnishing of water for the irrigation of the landscaping and the maintenance of any of the public lighting facilities or appurtenant facilities and the furnishing of electric current or energy, gas or other illuminating agent for the public lighting facilities, or for the lighting or operation of landscaping or appurtenant facilities. The plans and specifications for the improvements, showing the general nature, location, and the extent of the improvements, are on file in the office of the City Engineer and are incorporated herein by reference. eng report 141 5draft Connnu ity Economic Solutions City of Baldwin Park Citywide Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District Page 4 PART B AN ESTIMATE OF THE COSTS OF THE IMPROVEMENTS The estimated cost of the construction, operation, servicing and maintenance of the improvements for Fiscal Year 2014 -15, as described in Part A, are summarized herein and described below. All costs include administration and utilities where applicable. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK CITYWIDE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FY 2014 -15 Budget Estimated Beginning Fund Balance 7/1/2014 $416,108 FY 2014 -15 Estimated Revenue Assessment Revenue $910,285 County Ad Valorem Tax $774,000 Penalties, Late Taxes, Earnings $93,500 Total Revenue $1,777,785 FY 2014 -15 Projected Expenditures Street Lighting $590,700 �: u xQen nnn i i Laua U- a N 1g 'RV-rv,vvv Traffic Signals $285,000 Total Expenditures $1,715,700 FY 2014 -15 Operating Reserve / Deficit $62,085 Projected Fund Balance 6/30/2015 Beginning Fund Balance $416,108 FY 2014 -15 Revenues $1,777,785 FY 2014 -15 Expenditures $1,715,700 Projected Fund Balance 6/30/2015 $478,193 The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set -up for the revenues and expenditures of the District. Funds raised by assessment shall be used only for the purpose as stated herein. A contribution to the District by the City may be made to reduce assessments, as the City Council deems appropriate. Any balance or deficit remaining on July 1 must be carried over to the next fiscal year. eng report 141 5draft Comn7unity Econoinic Soliitions City of Baldwin Park Citywide Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District Page 5 PART C The diagram of the Assessment District showing the exterior boundaries of the Assessment District and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the Assessment District is required in accordance with Sections 22570 and 22571. Each lot or parcel shall be identified by a distinctive number or letter. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land shown on the diagram shall conform to those shown on the county assessor's maps for the fiscal year to which the report applies. The Diagram has been prepared and is on file with the City Engineer. The boundaries of the District are coterminous with the boundaries of the City of Baldwin Park. A diagram showing the exterior boundaries of the District and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the District has been submitted to the office of the City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, and is hereby made a part hereof by reference. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County of Los Angeles. The Assessor's maps and records are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this report. engreportl415draft Communiqr Economic Sohidons City of Baldwin Park Citywide Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District Page 6 PART D ASSESSMENT OF THE ESTIMATED COSTS OF THE IMPROVEMENTS GENERAL Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, permits the establishment of assessment districts by cities for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, operation, maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals, parks and landscaping. The 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." "The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000)) [of the California Streets and Highways Code]." In addition, Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Because assessments are levied on the basis of benefit, they are not considered to be a tax governed by Article XIilA of the California Constitution. The 1972 Act permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Thus, the 1972 Act requires the levy of a true "assessment" rather than a "special tax." ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY The landscaping, lighting and traffic signals are for the benefit and enjoyment of all properties within the District and all parcels benefit from the maintenance of the improvements. The assessment of cost upon each parcel was apportioned in accordance with the estimated benefit received. Traffic signal maintenance costs are assessed throughout the district on a per parcel basis. The criteria for the assessment spread of lighting and landscaping is as follows: Rectangular lots - street frontage 2. Irregular lots - width of lot at setback line - average of front and rear lot line lengths or - street frontage, whichever is most representative of benefit 3. Flag lots - one -half of total footage to each of the two lots 4. Corner lots - the narrowest frontage engreport1415draft Commiinity Econonwic Solutions City of Baldwin Park Citywide Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District Page 7 Excepted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights -of -ways, public greenbelts and public parkways, and that portion of public property that is not developed and used for business purposes similar to private commercial, industrial and institutional activities. BENEFIT ZONES The District is divided into four benefit zones. Zone 1 includes all residential parcels and Zone 2 includes all commercial and industrial parcels that are assessed for street lighting and traffic signal maintenance. Zone 3 includes all commercial, industrial and residential parcels that are assessed for landscaping maintenance. Zone 4 includes the West Ramona Residential Redevelopment Project (Tract Nos. 39090, 39635, 40746, 42828 and 41956) and is assessed for landscaping, lighting and traffic signal maintenance. The proposed assessment for Fiscal Year 2014 -15 is derived by apportioning a part of the total cost shown in Part B among the assessable parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits. A portion of the Assessment District Revenues is derived from Countywide Property Taxes or the Ad Valorem Tax. The City receives this amount as part of its tax apportionment and has designated a percentage to be used for lighting and landscape purposes. Description Frontage and Parcel Counts Proposed Assessment Assessment Revenues* Zone 1 & 2 (Street Lighting) 2. Commercial / Industrial 91,256 L.F. $0.5543 / L.F. $ 50,583 1. Residential 650,104 L.F. $0.2809 / L.F. $ 182,614 Zone 3 (Landscaping) All Parcels (excluding Zone 4) 741,361 L.F. $0.7513 / L.F. $ 556,984 Zone 4 (Lights /Landscaping) Tract # 39090, 39635, 40746, 42828, & 41956 160 Lots $36.01 / Lot $ 5,762 Parcel #1164 14 Lots $51.44 / Lot $ 720 Zone 2 (Traffic Signals) Commercial / Industrial (including Parcel #1164) 887 Lots $11.87 /Parcel $ 10,529 Zone 1 & 4 (Traffic Signals) All Parcels 13,764 Lots $7.49 /Lot $ 103,092 Grand Total $ 910,285 The assessor's parcel number and the amount of assessment upon each lot or parcel are shown on the assessment roll. Upon confirmation by the City Council this data will be submitted to the Los Angeles County Auditor - Controller for the inclusion on the 2014 -15 tax roll. engreport1415draft Connmtjnity Ecorp rnic ohkd�' s City of Baldwin Park Citywide Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District Page 8 PROPERTY PART E ROLL The assessment set forth for each parcel is shown on the Assessment Roll for the District, submitted separately, as "Assessment Roll for City of Baldwin Park, Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District, Fiscal Year 2014 -15 ", which exhibit is incorporated by reference herein and is on file in the office of the City Clerk. The Assessment Roll lists all parcels within the boundaries of the District as shown on the Assessment Diagram, Part C herein, and on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of Los Angeles, which is by reference made part of this report. Assessments are not levied upon public streets, utility easements, right -of -way, and common areas. A list of names and addresses of the owners of all parcels within this District is shown on the last equalized Property Tax Roll of the Assessor of the County of Los Angeles, which by reference is hereby made a part of this report. This list is keyed to the Assessor's Parcel Numbers as shown on the Assessment Roll on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park. engreport1415draft Corm° G`� ity non7ic Sofwfifons SAN.GABRCEL ' e 2rO VALLEY ay FROM: s �y Ogq71�D JAW) DATE: SUMMARY MINE The Honorable Michael Tay or ITEM NO. and Members of the City Council Executive Team Mana; Tlie Mayor and City Council are required to adopt a budget annually for each fiscal year for the City. In addition, they must also adopt budgets for the Successor Agency, the Housing Authority and the Financing Authority where they also sit as Board Members. Attached are copies of the proposed budgets for Fiscal Year 2014/15 and the Resolutions adopting them. FISCAL IMPACT TOTAL BUDGET General Fund $25,023,769 Other Funds Internal Service Funds $ 4,531,691 Special Revenue Funds $ 26,927,291 Financing Authority $ 3,298,920 Housing Authority $ 5,362,411 Successor Agency $ 15,025,133 RECOMMENDATION $80,169,215 That the Mayor and City Council approve the City, respective Agency and Authority Budgets for Fiscal Year 2014/15 by adopting City Resolution No. 2014 -025, Financing Authority Resolution No. 2014 -002, Housing Authority Resolution No. 2014 -003 and Successor Agency Resolution No. 2014 -003 Staff Report for Fiscal Year 2014/15 Budget Adoption Page 2 of 3 LEGAL REVIEW None Required The Mayor and City Council must adopt a budget each fiscal year for the City and its respective Agency and Authorities to operate. The Acting Executive Manager and Director of Finance met initially with each member of the Executive Team to review their departmental budgets and their various requests. From those meetings a proposed budget was assembled for the Mayor and City Council to review and consider. The Mayor and Members of the City Council held initial study sessions on June 10th and 11th. A third session was held on June 24th. During these sessions, staff was asked various questions and was asked to provide additional information and alternatives. At the meeting of June 24th, the Mayor and City Council gave staff final directions on the changes they wanted to the original proposed budget. Those changes have been incorporated into the attached documents. The theme for the next budget year is "Replace, Restore, and Revive ". The objectives of this budget are to replace key outdated equipment and vehicles, restore several levels and revive the spirit of the staff and community. The proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2014/15 is $80,169,215. The City's General Fund budget is proposed to be $25,023,769. This is an increase of $581,928 or 2.4% over last year's budget. It provides for no layoffs and some increases in service levels. The proposed budget has a projected surplus of $153,501 and a projected ending General Fund Balance of $6.376 million. The proposed budget restores two positions in Community Development that had to be eliminated several years ago due to the economic downturn and the elimination of the Redevelopment Agency. The Associate Planner will allow for a quicker turn around in plans and in answering questions about development. The Economic Project Coordinator will allow the City to once again be proactive in economic development. In addition, two part-time positions are also proposed in Planning and in Building to allow for greater efficiency and better service to the public at the counter. Public Safety continues to be the priority for the Mayor and City Council. Earlier this year the Council increased the sworn manning levels to 78 with the addition of a second Captain. While the authorized manning levels remain at 78 sworn officers, the current budget provides a full year funding for 70 officers. This funding allows for a historic 10 % vacancy factor due to retirements, transfer and resignations during the year. In addition, the department is attempting to catch up from the past as the City currently has only 64 officers. The 70 officer manning level would allow for the full staffing of patrol and free up more time for those officers on specialized assignments and the detectives to spend even more time on investigations. Staff Report for Fiscal Year 2014/15 Budget Adoption Page 3 of 3 In addition the Police Department is giving up 5 part-time positions and recommending replacing them with three full -time positions. These positions include a dispatcher, a records specialist II and a community service officer. The Chief believes this will substantially reduce staff turnover in these areas and result in a more experienced staff providing support to the officers in the field. The community service officer will continue to coordinate the domestic violence program and will also be re- establishing the community outreach program for the department. This past year the City started replacing some of the police vehicles that were over 100,000 miles and constantly breaking down. It had been several years where no replacement police vehicles were bought. This year the budget allows for two police vehicles to be bought out of the General Fund and several more specialty Police vehicles to be purchased out of Asset Forfeiture Funds. In addition to the police vehicles, funds are also budgeted for a new fueling station, repair of the garage doors and replacement of several other outdated and obsolete pieces of equipment. Because of the previous economic downturn there were many positions eliminated several years ago. The responsibilities of these individuals were picked up by current staff or increased work hours of part-time employees. Now many of these part-time positions are working over 38 hours a week and are really full -time in the number of hours worked. This budget includes reclassifying 14 positions where individuals are currently working full -time and making them full -time employees. This should result in better service over the long term providing for more continuity, less turn-over, more production and better service to the community While there is a definite growth in the economy and some related economic revenue sources it remains at a slow pace. The City needs to take the continued balanced and conservative approach to spending and the managing of these expenditures. Staff will continue to monitor the situation closely and keep the Mayor and City Council appraised of any change that will impact revenues and the budget. In addition, staff will also be bringing to the City Council various revenue options for them to discuss and consider at a later date. The adoption of these four resolutions will allow the City to keep operating and providing the necessary services to the public and the community for the next fiscal year. Attachments: Budget Resolutions (4) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ADOPTING THE BUDGET OF THE CITY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 2014 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 2015 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the Budget for the City of Baldwin Park for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2014 and ending June 30, 2015, is hereby adopted as prepared and submitted by the Chief Executive Officer and as modified by the City Council for said fiscal year. A Budget is attached to this Resolution for adoption as presented. SECTION 2. That from and after the effective date of the adoption of said Budget, the several amounts stated therein as proposed expenditures, shall be deemed appropriated to the several departments, offices, and agencies for the respective objects and purposes therein stated. All appropriations with the exception of capital improvement programs, shall lapse at the end of the fiscal year to the extent that they shall not have been expended or lawfully encumbered, pursuant to the provisions of all applicable ordinances of the City and statutes of the State. SECTION 3. That the authority granted for making expenditures from other than the General Fund shall be limited to the actual amount of money received from the source of funds indicated in the Budget for each department, section, or purpose, and no liability upon the General Fund is assumed or can be imposed in excess of such amounts as may be provided therefore in this Budget from the General Fund. In the event that the amounts of money received and credited to the special funds exceed the amount herein estimated, such excess receipts shall be considered deferred allocations in such special funds, contingent upon such receipt and no expenditure thereof made except under the provisions as provided by law or ordinance. SECTION 4. That amounts appropriated to any account for any object or purpose may be transferred in the following manner: (A) That at any meeting after adoption of the budget, total appropriations may be amended by the City Council by a majority vote of a quorum of the City Council. (B) For transfers of appropriations within the same cost center program, such transfers in an amount less than $10,000 may be approved by the department head, and such transfers up to $15,000 may be approved by the Chief Executive Officer. For amounts greater than $15,000, City Council approval is required. (C) Transfers up to $15,000 between cost center programs may be approved by the Chief Executive Officer. For amounts greater than $15,000, City Council approval is required. [Type text] Resolution No. 2014-025 Page 2 (D) All transfers of appropriations in accordance with subsections (B) and (C) above shall be within the same fund. (E) Any transfer of appropriations from one fund to another fund is considered a new appropriation requiring a budget amendment, and such appropriations must be approved by the City Council by a majority vote of a quorum of the City Council. (F) All transfers made pursuant to the above provisions shall be submitted to the City Council for informational purposes. *30=11 311TIMSE301 TIVIN • MANUELLOZANO MAYOR ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ss: CITY OF BALDWIN PARK f 1, ALEJANDRA AVILA, City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park at a regular meeting of the City Council on July 2nd, 2014, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: 1'1 1 .......... 1110-1 1� ProjectedFund Balance ........................................................................................... Page I-| SECTION 11 — PROJECTED GENERAL FUND REVENUE General Fund Revenue bv Type and Category ....................................................... Page {{-1 General Fund Revenue Additional Charts .............................................................. Page 11-2 SECTION III — PROPOSDED GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES General Fund Expenditures 6*[) and C -----------..Pugc1U-\ General Fund Expenditures Chsota---------.----.---.-----.Po8eUI-2 General Fund Expenditures b« Cost Center with Department Totals ................... Page Dl-3 Gcouzul Fund Expenditures by Category with Cost Center and Dept. Totals ...... Page ID-5 Expenditures SECTION IV — PROJECT ED REVENUE ALL FUNDS 6v Fund ............................................................................................. Page \/-) Expenditures by Category ----------------.------.------PuucV-3 Expenditures by Department ---------------------------.Puee\L4 SECTION VI — PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT Administration (Includes City Council) -----------------.--' Page \/l-1 Finance.................................................................................................................. Page V7-2 N --------------------------------.9mucV]-3 Police..................................................................................................................... Page \4-5 Neighborhood Safety & Services .......................................................................... Page Y{-0 Community Development ----------------------------.Puue\/{-7 PublicWorks ......................................................................................................... Page \/l-4 SECTION 100 V11 — PERSONNEL COST Personnel Cost Summary ..................................................................................... Page VII- | Position Control Table, Full Time Positions ........................................................ Page \/D-2 Part Time Cost Summary ..................................................................................... Page l/D-6 Im liq Ml City of Baldwin Park Fiscal Year 2014 -2015 Projected Fund Balance Fund Fund Description General Fund: 100 General Fund i Subtotal - General Fund Internal Services Funds: 401 Information and Support Services 402 Fleet Services 403 Internal Insurance Subtotal - Internal Services Funds Special (Restricted) Funds: 200 Future Development fund 205 Federal Asset Forfeiture 206 State Asset Forfeiture 207 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant 220 Community Development Block Grant 221 H.O.M.E. (Home Investment Partnership Program 222 CAI, Home 223 Economic Development Act Revolving Loan 230 AB 1693 Business Improveme nt Fees 231 Air Quality Management 234 Park Land and Public Art Fees 235 General Plan Fees 240 Gasoline Tax 241 Surface Transportation Program 242 Traffic Congestion Relief 243 Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety 244 Proposition A 245 Proposition C 246 AB939 integrated Waste Management 247 Oil Recycling Grant 249 Storm Drains NPDS 250 Assessment District 251 Street Lighting and Landscape 252 Parks Maintenance Assessment District 253 Proposition A - Parks 254 Measure R Local Return 260 Summer Lunch Program 270 Grants Fund 271 Police Grants Fund 301 Building Reserve 2 Subtotal Special Funds All Funds Projected 2015 2015 2015 2015 Projected Fund Balance Projected Projected Proposed Proposed Fund Balance 06/30/2014 Revenues Transfers In Expenditures Transfers Out 06/30/201.5 6,222,234 25,177,270 0 24,090,456 933,313 6,375,735 6,222,234 25,177,270 0 24,090,456 933,313 6,375,735 113,649 836,929 0 853,027 0 97,551 (101,133) 1,080,520 0 1,077,735 0 (98,349) (1,526,153) 2,624,962 0 2,600,929 0 (1,502,120) (1,513,637) 4,542,411 0 4,531,691 0 (1,502,917) 10,505,428 10,000 0 0 0 10,515,428 1,301,583 306,000 0 480,250 0 1,127,333 169,516 3,600 0 10,000 0 163,116 12,229 100 0 2,400 0 9,929 (136,893) 2,259,416 0 1,824,585 506,820 (208,882) 4,531 2,526,760 0 2,528,600 0 2,691 7,749 330 0 0 0 8,079 1,547,131 27,000 0 167,602 0 1,406,528 256,261 60,600 0 22,000 0 294,861 68,127 97,900 0 165,114 0 912 952,225 101,800 0 20,000 0 1,034,025 492,154 70,800 0 40,060 0 522,894 1,931,726 1,939,084 0 2,383,296 400,900 1,086,613 678,460 1,200 0 678,000 0 1,660 176,961 7,000 0 170,000 0 13,961 113,233 500 0 100,000 0 13,733 622,259 1,236,400 0 1,364,591 0 494,068 926,997 1,018,285 0 1,044,615 0 900,666 289,749 319,700 0 360,263 0 249,185 40,612 30,000 0 23,000 0 47,612 8,803 50,100 0 51,405 0 7,498 372,021 12,430 0 0 0 384,451 461,481 1,784,787 0 1,927,554 0 318,714 15,915 674,000 142,134 832,049 0 0 (63,642) 64,360 76,062 76,780 0 0 1,706,596 788,805 0 1,055,712 0 1,439,689 1,469 168,000 37,237 206,706 0 0 211,042 9,694,206 0 9,719,946 0 185,302 159,592 608,394 0 765,042 0 2,944 9,479 0 0 0 0 9,479 22,842,793 23,861,557 255,433 26,019,571 907,720 20,032,492 TOTAL GENERAL, INTERNAL SERV., & SPECIAL FUNDS: 27,551,390 53,581,238 255,433 54,641,718 1,841,033 24,905,309 Financing Authority Funds: 601 Debt Service 610 COP Lease Payment 625 Gas Tax Debt Service 630 Bond Issuance SGR Refi 635 BPFA /PM 2003 Tax Alloc 636 BPFA 1990 Tax Alloc 637 BPFA /CBD 1990 Refunding Loan 650 Pension Obligation Bond Subtotal Financing Authority Funds Unreserved fund balance 2 Excludes amounts due from other funds 94,000 34,150 506,820 506,820 0 128,150 650,000 0 677,880 679,580 0 648,300 3,000 50 400,900 402,900 0 1,050 0 0 0 0 0 0 564,021 0 0 0 0 564,021 0 0 0 0 0 0 475,762 0 0 0 0 475,762 233 1,709,820 0 1,709,620 0 433 1,787,016 1,744,020 1,585,600 3,298,920 0 1,817,716 City of Baldwin Park Fiscal Year 2014 -2015 Projected Fund Balance All Funds I -2 Projected 2015 2015 2015 2015 Projected Fund Balance Projected Projected Proposed Proposed Fund Balance Fund Fund Description 06/30/2014 Revenues Transfers In Expenditures Transfers Out 06/30/2015 Successor Agency Funds: 800 RDA Obligation Retirement 0 6,820,000 0 0 6,820,000 0 Capital Projects 801 SG River Capital Prj 0 0 44,880 44,880 0 0 802 Puente/Merced Capital Prj 0 0 41,300 41,300 0 0 803 W Ramona Capital Prj 0 0 0 0 0 0 804 Cntrt Business Dist Capital Prj 0 0 41,300 41,300 0 0 805 Delta Capital Prj 0 0 39,770 39,770 0 0 806 Sierra Vista Capital Prj 120,000 0 50,750 50,750 0 120,000 825 Merged Area Prj Fund 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal Capital Projects 120,000 0 218,000 218,000 0 120,000 Debt Service 831 SG River Debt Sery 413,598 0 1,000,000 878,650 121,164 413,784 832 Puente /Merced Debt Sery 177,500 420,000 450,000 835,288 0 212,212 833 W Ramona Debt Sery 0 0 0 0 0 0 834 Cntrl Business Dist Debt Sery 2,000 40,000 1,652,000 1,691,625 0 2,375 835 Delta Debt Sery 15,000 0 320,000 90,500 229,496 15,004 836 Sierra Vista Debt Sery 450,000 0 3,600,000 2,993,450 606,550 450,000 837 BP Merged 2000 Refinance 1,037,000 0 537,210 537,210 0 1,037,000 Subtotal Debt Service 2,095,098 460,000 7,559,210 7,026,723 957,210 2,130,375 Low/Mod Housing 890 Low /Mod Income Housing 67,000 70,000 0 3,200 0 133,800 Subtotal Low/Mod Housing 67,000 70,000 0 3,200 0 133,800 TOTAL SUCCESSOR AGENCY FUNDS: 2,282,098 7,350,000 7,777,210 7,247,923 7,777,210 2,384,175 Housing Authority: 901 Housing Voucher Choice 573,531 5,292,000 0 5,270,311 0 595,219 905 Public Housing 549,612 31,700 13,140 78,960 0 515,492 910 CIAP 20,610 33,750 0 0 13,140 41,220 Subtotal Housing Authority Funds 1,143,753 5,357,450 13,140 5,349,271 13,140 1,151,932 COMBINED GRAND TOTAL - ALL FUNDS 32,764,257 68,032,708 9,631,383 70,537,832 9,631,383 30,259,132 I -2 mw_..a WA . � ^�� \� \§ .... \ \�° . \�� �< � \� � \� \[ / \� : \���� / \\ City of Baldwin Park General Fund Revenue Summary by Type REVENUE TYPE FY2012/2013 ACTUALS @ 06/30/13 FY2013C2014 ADOPTED REVENUE FY2014/2015 PROJECTED REVENUE VARIANCE FY2014/2015 vs. FY2013/2014 PROPERTYTAXES 3,433,425 3,639,200 3,830,129 190,929 SALES TAX 5.812.540 5.702.100 5.652.940 (40.180) TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX 222.886 218.000 258.350 40.350 FRANCHISE TAX 2.052.259 2.173.000 2.141.200 (31.800) UTILITY USERS TAX 2.252.188 2.276.000 2.376.210 101.210 LICENSES &PERMITS 378.985 413.000 483.200 80.200 BUSINESS LICENSE TAX 540.538 587.000 601.200 34.200 FINES &PENALTIES 1.268.875 1.245.000 1.237.210 (7.790) USE DF MONEY &PROPERTY 202.187 230.000 230.000 0 PROP TX|N LIEU (]F VLF /|NTERGOV 6.420.618 6.583.500 6.811.910 228.410 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 1.159.573 1.351.000 1.389.781 38.181 MISCELLANEOUS 197.820 140.000 164.140 14.140 SUBTOTAL GENERAL FUND OPERATING REVENUE ONE TIME REVENUE SOURCES TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE 751.762 1.000.000 General Fund FY 201412015 Projected Revenue by Category OTHER USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 2.0% TAXES FINES & PENALTIES-/// CHARGES FOR SERVICES City of Baldwin Park General Fund Projected Revenues - Fiscal Year 2014/2011 2,250,000 2,000,000 1,750,000 1,500,000 1,250,000 1,000,000 750,000 500,000 250,000 0 General Fund Other Major Revenue Sources � 4 --+-LICENSES & PERMITS --*-FINES & PENALTIES FOR SERVICES 11-2 0 FU NO Y VIN - CITY O BALDWIN • •: EXPENDITURE SUMMARIES • '. .'! -ISCAL YEAR 2014/2015 PROPOSED EXPENDITURE BUDGE1 gj TREV FY 2012/2013 FY 2013/2014 FY 2014/2015 FY2014/2015 ACTUALS ADOPTED PROPOSED VS. DEPARTMENT @ 06/30/13 BUDGET BUDGET FY2013/2014 ADMINISTRATION 814,222 966,210 1,015,438 49,228 FINANCE 578,854 771,950 635,050 (136,900) NON - DEPARTMENTAL 1,704,168 818,888 831,900 13,012 POLICE 16,514,269 15,906,314 16,215,539 309,225 NEIGHBORHOOD SAFETY & SERVICES 149,904 1,031,016 925,391 (105,625) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 746,108 912,344 1,005,181 92,837 PUBLIC WORKS 1,060,040 1,182,028 1,313,673 131,645 RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES 2,020,830 2,853,090 3,081,596 228,506 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 23,588,395 24;441;841 25,023;769 581,928 • �•T VARIANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES 23,588,395 24,441,841 25,023,769 581,928 III -I FY 2012/2013 FY 2013/2014 FY 2014/2015 FY2014/2015 ACTUALS ADOPTED PROPOSED VS. CATEGORY @ 06/30113 BUDGET BUDGET FY2013/2014 CAPITAL 89,210 83,800 207,560 123,760 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,347,383 2,436,790 2,308,095 (128,695) MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS 2,495,059 2,877,110 2,884,921 7,811 PERSONNEL COSTS 17,682,826 17,933,898 18,689,880 755,982 TRANSFERS OUT 973,917 1,110,243 933,313 (176,930) TOTAL EXPENDITURES 23,588,395 24,441,841 25,023,769 581,928 III -I City of Baldwin General • Proposed Expenditures = 119 =111121 M-1329TUIT-ME1, M-1 III -2 CITY OF BALDWIN PARK EXPENDITURE SUMMARIES - GENERAL FUND FISCAL YEAR 2014/2015 PROPOSED EXPENDITURE BUDGET ALL DEPARTMENTS - GENERAL FUND ONLY DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION 100-CITY COUNCIL 11O-CE{7SOFFICE 120-CITY CLERK 130-C|TYATTORNEY 150-PERSONNEL TOTAL ADMINISTRATION FINANCE 200'C|TYTREASURER 210-F|NANCE TOTAL FINANCE NON-DEPARTMENTAL UUO'NO COST CENTER 299'NON'DEPARTMENTAL TOTAL NON-DEPARTMENTAL ` POLICE 300-POLICE CHIEF 31O-POL|CEADMINISTRATION 320-COMK0UN|CAT|ONS 330-RECORDS 340-PATROL 350'TRAFF|C 360'|NVEGT|GAT|ONS 370'POL|CEJA|L 380'EMERGENCYDPERAT|ONS NEIGHBORHOOD SAFETY &SERVICES 3SO'0THER PUBLIC SAFETY SERV 391 -CODE ENFORCEMENT 392-PARKING ENFORCEMENT 814,222 966,210 1,015,438 49,228 17.934 23.172 25.222 VARIANCE FY 2012/2013 FY 2013/2014 FY 2014/2015 FY301412015 ACTUAL3 ADOPTED PROPOSED Vs. 873.917 BUDGET BUDGET FY2013/2014 106.204 224.382 241.582 7.200 116.582 136.037 114.095 (21.942) 54.221 131.437 144.087 12.850 230/695 183.000 234.000 41.000 246,520 271,345 281,665 10,320 814,222 966,210 1,015,438 49,228 17.934 23.172 25.222 2.050 580.920 748.778 609.828 (138.950 578.854 771,950 885,050 (136,900) 873.917 O O O 730.251 818.888 831.900 13.012 1.704'168 818.888 831,900 13,012 734.060 808.308 1.000.001 193.693 1.280.554 1.312.440 1.086.702 (215.658 892/412 943.929 1.010.789 68.060 396.075 299,281 364/511 05.330 7.919.018 8.031.807 8.271.247 239.440 1.340.782 895.042 795.733 (99.310 3.558.785 3,203.108 3,261.877 58.809 348.068 361.400 361.400 O 40.517 53.000 53.000 0 16'514'268 15.906.314 16,215,539 308.225 O 772.856 647.161 (125.085) 148.470 144.880 100.080 15.100 1,425 113.180 118.150 4.970 149,904 1,031,016 925,391 (105,625) |U' DEPARTMENT FY 2012/2013 ACTUALS @ 06/30/13 FY 2013/2014 ADOPTED BUDGET FY 2014/2015 PROPOSED BUDGET VARIANCE FY2014/2015 VS. FY2013/2014 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 57,092 82,121 87,961 5,840 400 - COMMUNITY DEV DIRECTOR 26,714 130,389 81,679 (48,710) 405 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 0 0 85,680 85,680 410 - FEDERALLY ASSISTED HOUSING 0 6,912 6,912 0 420 -CDBG 21,345 2,237 2,237 0 440 - PLANNING 260,014 235,575 308,345 72,770 450 - BUILDING & SAFETY 432,714 455,744 489,101 33,357 470 - COMMUNITY DEVADMIN 5,321 81,486 31,226 (50,260) TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 746,108 912,344 1,005,181 92,837 500 - PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 28,075 37,266 19,466 (17,800) 510 - ENGINEERING 57,092 82,121 87,961 5,840 520 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 28,480 25,447 26,367 920 540 -WASTE MNG /ENVIRO SERV 6,041 9,963 15,403 5,440 550 - TRAFFIC CONTROL 9,088 4,240 3,550 (690) 552 - STREET SWEEPING 10,000 16,300 0 (16,300) 560 - LANDSCAPE 14,152 152,126 230,975 78,849 561 -TREES 4,125 4,204 4,354 150 562 - IRRIGATION 6,372 1,463 1,463 0 570 - GRAFFITI ABATEMENT 12,417 14,960 7,760 (7,200) 571 -COURT REFERRAL 5,869 6,180 6,940 760 581- TRANSIT FACILITY MAINT 35,422 25,830 28,880 3,050 595 - FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 842,907 801,926 880,552 78,626 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 1,060,040 1,182,028 1,313,673 131,645 RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES 600 - RECREATION & COMM SERV DIR 168,097 172,812 185,442 12,630 610 - RECREATION SERVICES 920,302 1,549,112 1,676,604 127,492 630- SENIOR SERVICES CENTER 161,115 201,191 213,051 11,860 640 - FAMILY SERVICE CENTER 62,319 80,383 83,443 3,060 650- CHILDRENS SERVICES 216,892 290,895 333,969 43,074 660 -TEEN CENTER /SKATE PARK 200,358 235,387 249,427 14,040 670 - BARNES PARK 105,643 138,406 140,956 2,550 680 -ARTS & RECREATION CENTER 186,104 184,905 198,705 13,800 TOTAL RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES 2,020,830 2,853,090 3,081,596 228,506 TOTAL EXPENDITURES ALL DEPARTMENTS 23,588,395 24,441,841 25,023,769 581,928 111 -4 CITY OF A D +. FISCAL YEAR 2014/2015 PROPOSED EXPENDITURE BUDGET NEPARTMENT SUMMARY • • GENERAL FUND ONLY I 110 -CEO'S OFFICE CONTRACTUAL SERVICES MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS PERSONNEL COSTS TRANSFERS OUT 110 -CEO'S OFFICE TOTAL 120 -CITY CLERK CONTRACTUAL SERVICES MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS PERSONNEL COSTS 120 -CITY CLERK TOTAL 130 -CITY ATTORNEY CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 130 -CITY ATTORNEY TOTAL 150 - PERSONNEL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS PERSONNEL COSTS TRANSFERS OUT 150 - PERSONNEL TOTAL 0 2,500 2,500 0 VARIANCE 17,607 FY 2012/2013 FY 2013/2014 FY 2014/2015 FY2014/2015 93,970 ACTUALS ADOPTED PROPOSED VS. COST CENTER / CATEGORY @ 06/30/13 BUDGET BUDGET FY2013/2014 100 -CITY COUNCIL 7,200 0 (7,200) 246,520 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,646 3,000 1,500 (1,500) MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS 17,193 47,932 45,932 (2,000) PERSONNEL COSTS 145,365 183,460 194160 10,700 100 -CITY COUNCIL TOTAL 166,204 234,392 241,592 7,200 110 -CEO'S OFFICE CONTRACTUAL SERVICES MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS PERSONNEL COSTS TRANSFERS OUT 110 -CEO'S OFFICE TOTAL 120 -CITY CLERK CONTRACTUAL SERVICES MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS PERSONNEL COSTS 120 -CITY CLERK TOTAL 130 -CITY ATTORNEY CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 130 -CITY ATTORNEY TOTAL 150 - PERSONNEL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS PERSONNEL COSTS TRANSFERS OUT 150 - PERSONNEL TOTAL 0 2,500 2,500 0 7,607 17,607 17,625 18 108,975 89,430 93,970 4,540 0 26,500 0 (26,500) 116,582 136,037 114,095 (21,942) 2,787 54,000 13,000 (41,000) 15,421 29,367 32,367 3,000 36,013 48,070 98,720 50,650 54,221 131,437 144,087 12,650 230,695 193,000 234,000 41,000 230,695 193,000 234,000 41,000 67,183 30,000 45,000 15,000 18,665 59,045 61,045 2,000 160,672 175,100 175,620 520 0 7,200 0 (7,200) 246,520 271,345 281,665 10,320 •. .• III -5 • • 171 DEPARTMENT • CATEGORY GENERAL ONLY AW-11w ,l - k_ CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 136,863 70,600 68,100 VARIANCE MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS FY 2012/2013 FY 201312014 FY 2014/2015 FY2014/2015 PERSONNEL COSTS ACTUALS ADOPTED PROPOSED VS. COST CENTER / CATEGORY @ 06/30/13 BUDGET BUDGET FY2013/2014 200 -CITY TREASURER 560,920 748,778 609,828 (138,950) MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS 1,580 492 2,492 2,000 PERSONNEL COSTS 16,354 22,680 22,730 50 200 -CITY TREASURER TOTAL 17,934 23,172 25,222 2,050 ,l - k_ CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 136,863 70,600 68,100 (2,500) MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS 37,074 96,398 94,898 (1,500) PERSONNEL COSTS 386,983 444,780 446,830 2,050 TRANSFERS OUT 0 137,000 0 (137,000) 210 - FINANCE TOTAL 560,920 748,778 609,828 (138,950) TOTAL FINANCE 578,854 771,950 635,050 (136,900) III -6 VARIANCE FY 201212013 FY 2013/2014 FY 2014/2015 FY2014/2015 ACTUALS ADOPTED PROPOSED VS. COST CENTER / CATEGORY @ 06/30/13 BUDGET BUDGET FY2013/2014 000 -NO COST CENTER TRANSFERS OUT 000 -NO COST CENTER TOTAL 299 -NON- DEPARTMENTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS PERSONNEL COSTS 299- NON - DEPARTMENTAL TOTAL TOTAL NON - DEPARTMENTAL 973,917 0 0 0 0 i 35,431 50,900 75,900 25,000 48,880 53,450 49,700 (3,750) 645,940 714,538 706,300 (8,238) 730,251 818,888 831,900 13,012 1,704,168 818,888 831,900 13,012 III -7 CITY OF BALDWIN ••• FISCAL . • 201412015 PROPOSED • ` • *EPARTMENT SUMMARY BY • - & CATEGORY GENERAL 310 - POLICE ADMINISTRATION CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 383,751 255,400 235,400 VARIANCE MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS FY 2012/2013 FY 2013/2014 FY 2014/2015 FY2014/2015 PERSONNEL COSTS ACTUALS ADOPTED PROPOSED VS. COST CENTER / CATEGORY @ 06/30/13 BUDGET BUDGET FY2013/2014 300 - POLICE CHIEF CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 12,379 0 0 0 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS 38,445 40,688 52,288 11,600 PERSONNEL COSTS 683,236 765,620 947,713 182,093 300 - POLICE CHIEF TOTAL 734,060 806,308 1,000,001 193,693 310 - POLICE ADMINISTRATION CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 383,751 255,400 235,400 (20,000) MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS 231,013 184,680 193,980 9,300 PERSONNEL COSTS 665,790 872,360 667,402 (204,958) 310 - POLICE ADMINISTRATION TOTAL 1,280,554 1,312,440 1,096,782 (215,658) 320 - COMMUNICATIONS CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6,310 7,500 7,500 0 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS 43,619 82,239 82,239 (0) PERSONNEL COSTS 842,483 854,190 921,050 66,860 320 - COMMUNICATIONS TOTAL 892,412 943,929 1,010,789 66,860 330 - RECORDS CONTRACTUAL SERVICES MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS PERSONNEL COSTS 330 - RECORDS TOTAL 340 - PATROL CAPITAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS PERSONNEL COSTS 340 - PATROL TOTAL 870 1,000 1,000 0 36,494 64,461 64,461 0 358,711 233,820 299,150 65,330 396,075 299,281 364,611 65,330 71,756 68,800 142,560 73,760 74,361 71,000 71,000 0 748,908 796,537 802,717 6,181 7,023,991 7,095,470 7,254,970 159,500 7,919,016 8,031,807 8,271,247 239,441 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 516,391 0 0 0 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS 58,365 67,392 69,992 2,601 PERSONNEL COSTS 766,026 827,650 725,741 (101,909) 350 - TRAFFIC TOTAL 1,340,782 895,042 795,733 (99,308) Il W.i �xrrr�smrta; VARIAACZ 1 2013/2014 1, ` 1 1 1 COST CENTER / CATEGORY ACTUALS @ 06/30/13 ADOPTED BUDGET PROPOSED BUDGET VS. FY2013/2014 360- INVESTIGATIONS CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,414 7,000 7,000 0 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS 304,685 347,688 352,388 4,701 PERSONNEL COSTS 3,250,686 2,848,420 2,902,589 54,169 360- INVESTIGATIONS TOTAL 3,556,785 3,203,108 3,261,977 58,869 370 - POLICE JAIL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 346,916 358,400 358,400 0 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS 1,152 3,000 3,000 0 370 - POLICE JAIL TOTAL 348,068 361,400 361,400 0 380 - EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 38,986 44,000 44,000 0 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS 7,531 9,000 9,000 0 380 - EMERGENCY OPERATIONS TOTAL 46,517 53,000 53,000 0 TOTAL POLICE 16,514,269 15,906,314 16,215,539 309,225 Illb7 CITY OF BALDWIN PARK FISCAL YEAR PROPOSED DEPARTMENT SUMMARY BY COST CENTER & CATEGORY GENERAL FUND ONLY VARIANCE FY 2012/2013 FY 2013/2014 FY 2014/2015 FY2014/2015 ACTUALS ADOPTED PROPOSED VS. COST CENTER / CATEGORY @ 06/30/13 BUDGET BUDGET FY2013/2014 390 -OTHER PUBLIC SAFETY SERV CONTRACTUAL SERVICES MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS 390 -OTHER PUBLIC SAFETY SERV TOTAI 391 -CODE ENFORCEMENT CONTRACTUAL SERVICES MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS PERSONNEL COSTS 391 -CODE ENFORCEMENT TOTAL 392 - PARKING ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL COSTS 392- PARKING ENFORCEMENT TOTAL 0 769,900 644,205 0 2,956 2,956 (125,695) 0 0 772,856 64 ?,161 (125,695) 6,060 16,000 16,000 0 52,629 52,910 47,810 (5,100) 89,790 76,070 96,270 20,200 148,479 144,980 160,080 15,100 1,425 113,180 118,150 4,970 1,425 113,180 118,150 4;97n 149,904 1,031,016 925,391 (105,625) CITY OF :• rn •.- PROPOSED EXPENDITURE BUDGET DEPARTMENT SUMMARY BY COST CATEGORY GENERAL ONLY Isle] 9 :A ih COST CENTER / CATEGORY 400 - COMMUNITY DEV DIRECTOR CONTRACTUAL SERVICES MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS PERSONNEL COSTS TRANSFERS OUT 400 - COMMUNITY DEV DIRECTOR TOTAL 405 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTUAL SERVICES MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS PERSONNEL COSTS 400 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TOTAL 410 - FEDERALLY ASSISTED HOUSING CONTRACTUAL SERVICES MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS 410 - FEDERALLY ASSISTED HOUSING TO' 420 -CDBG MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS PERSONNEL COSTS 420 -CDBG TOTAL 440 - PLANNING CONTRACTUAL SERVICES MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS PERSONNEL COSTS 440 - PLANNING TOTAL 450 - BUILDING & SAFETY CONTRACTUAL SERVICES MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS PERSONNEL COSTS 450 - BUILDING & SAFETY TOTAL VARIAN FY r , • FY 2014/2015 ACTUALS ADOPTED PROPOSED V 06/30/13 r r 0 0 2,000 2,000 0 1,238 11,869 11,869 0 25,476 89,520 67,810 (21,710) 0 27,000 0 (27,000) 26,714 130,389 81,679 (48,710) 0 0 1,500 1,500 0 0 3,500 3,500 0 0 80,680 80,680 0 0 85,680 85,680 0 1,440 1,440 (0) 0 5,472 5,472 (0) 0 6,913 6,912 (1) 0 2,237 2,237 (0) 21,345 0 0 0 21,345 2,237 2,237 (0) 15,000 28,350 216,664 45,000 34,705 155,870 20,000 34,805 253,540 (25,000) 100 97,670 260,014 235,575 308,345 72,770 263 4,000 4,000 0 37,957 48,884 50,041 1,157 394,494 402,860 435,060 32,200 432,714 455,744 489,101 33,357 III -11 � •I11J � � •'ll __ • -r T,- . i • - FY 2014/2015 III -12 ACTUALS ADOPTED PROPOSED VS. COST CENTER / CATEGORY @ 06/30/13 BUDGET BUDGET FY2013/2014 470 - COMMUNITY DEV ADMIN MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS 0 10,466 10,466 0 PERSONNEL COSTS 5,321 18,720 20,760 2,040 TRANSFERS OUT 0 52,300 0 (52,300) 470 - COMMUNITY DEV ADMIN TOTAL 5,321 81,486 31,226 (50,260) TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 746,108 912,344 1,005,181 92,837 III -12 COST CENTER / CATEGORY 500 - PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR CONTRACTUAL SERVICES MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS PERSONNEL COSTS 500 - PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TOTAL 510 - ENGINEERING CONTRACTUAL SERVICES MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS PERSONNEL COSTS 510 - ENGINEERING TOTAL 520 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTUAL SERVICES MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS PERSONNELCOSTS 520- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT TOTAL 540 -WASTE MNG /ENVIRO SERV MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS PERSONNEL COSTS 540 -WASTE MNG /ENVIRO SERV TOTAL 550 - TRAFFIC CONTROL MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS PERSONNEL COSTS 550 - TRAFFIC CONTROL TOTAL 552 - STREET SWEEPING MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS 552 - STREET SWEEPING TOTAL 560 - LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS PERSONNEL COSTS TRANSFERS OUT 560 - LANDSCAPE TOTAL 746 40,000 40,000 VARIANCE FY 201212013 FY 2013/2014 FY 2014/2015 FY2014/2015 ACTUALS ADOPTED PROPOSED VS. @ 06/30/13 BUDGET BUDGET FY2013/2014 108 5,000 5,000 0 9,966 5,206 5,206 0 18,001 27,060 9,260 (17,800) 28,075 37,266 19,466 (17,800) 746 40,000 40,000 0 13,404 8,651 8,651 0 42,942 33,470 39,310 5,840 57,092 82,121 87,961 5,840 400 0 0 0 5,174 3,137 3,137 0 22,906 22,310 23,230 920 28,480 25,447 26,367 920 1,833 4,208 5,763 4,200 5,763 9,640 0 5,440 6,041 9,963 15,403 5,440 300 240 240 0 8,788 4,000 3,310 (690) 9,088 4,240 3,550 (690) 10,000 16,300 1 (16,30(l 10,000 1 C # • 1 1' 810 709 709 0 13,342 7,920 12,070 4,150 0 143,497 218,196 74,699 14,152 152,126 230,975 78,849 III -I3 i e z • • VARIANCE 2012/2013 2013/2014 2014/2015 14 1 III -14 ACTUALS ADOPTED PROPOSED VS. COST CENTER / CATEGORY @ 06130/13 BUDGET BUDGET FY2013/2014 561 -TREES MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS 920 834 834 0 PERSONNEL COSTS 3,205 3,370 3,520 150 561 -TREES TOTAL 4,125 4,204 4,354 150 562 - IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS 1,510 1,303 1,303 0 PERSONNEL COSTS 4,862 160 160 (0) 562 - IRRIGATION TOTAL 6,372 1,463 1,463 (0) 570 - GRAFFITI ABATEMENT PERSONNEL COSTS 12,417 14,960 7,760 (7,200) 570- GRAFFITI ABATEMENT TOTAL 12,417 14,960 7,760 (7,200) 571 -COURT REFERRAL PERSONNEL COSTS 5,869 6,180 6,940 760 571 -COURT REFERRAL TOTAL 5,869 6,180 6,940 760 581 - TRANSIT FACILITY MAINT PERSONNEL COSTS 35,422 25,830 28,880 3,050 COA Tf7AAI l�11 ITV AAA IRIT TO-r .701 -1 R/11tl SIT FACILITY T IYUII IN I 1 V I AL TC A7�1 JJ, l+GG •1C O ?A GJ,VJV ')O OOPS G , R nr_n J, VJV 595- FACILITIES MAINTENANCE CAPITAL 17,453 15,000 65,000 50,000 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 406,678 327,350 331,850 4,500 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS 354,045 375,286 360,942 (14,344) PERSONNEL COSTS 64,731 84,290 122,760 38,470 595 - FACILITIES MAINTENANCE TOTAL 842,907 801,926 880,552 78,626 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 1,060,040 1,182,028 1,313,673 131,645 III -14 a 1 1 -•'• a' GENERAL DEPARTMENT SUMMARY BY COST CENTER & CATEGORY VARIANCE FY 2012/2013 FY 2013/2014 FY 2014/2015 FY2014/2015 ACTUALS ADOPTED PROPOSED VS. COST CENTER / CATEGORY @ 06/30/13 BUDGET BUDGET FY2013/2014 600-RECREATION & COMM SERV DIR MAINTENANCE AND OPERA PERSONNEL COSTS 610 - RECREATION SERVICES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS PERSONNEL COSTS TRANSFERS OUT 610 - RECREATION SERVICES TOTAL 630 - SENIOR SERVICES CENTER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS PERSONNEL COSTS 630 - SENIOR SERVICES CENTER TOTAL 640 - FAMILY SERVICE CENTER MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS PERSONNEL COSTS 640 - FAMILY SERVICE CENTER TOTAL 650 - CHILDRENS SERVICES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS PERSONNELCOSTS TRANSFERS OUT 650- CHILDRENS SERVICES TOTAL 660 -TEEN CENTER /SKATE PARK CONTRACTUAL SERVICES MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS PERSONNEL COSTS 660 -TEEN CENTER /SKATE PARK TOTAL 16,832 23,802 23,802 (0) 151,265 149,010 161,640 12,630 168,097 172,812 185,442 12,630 46,112 43,500 43,500 0 201,489 167,742 172,392 4,650 672,701 653,290 782,832 129,542 0 684,580 677,880 (6,700) 920,302 1,549,112 1,676,604 127,492 2,485 3,000 3,000 0 29,691 47,511 47,511 0 128,939 150,680 162,540 11,860 161,115 201,191 213,051 11,860 6,848 17,143 17,143 0 55,471 63,240 66,300 3,060 62,319 80,383 83,443 3,060 1,221 7,100 7,100 0 44,161 43,629 43,629 0 171,510 208,000 246,003 38,003 0 32,166 37,237 5,071 216,892 290,895 333,969 43,074 600 4,900 4,900 0 24,402 46,087 46,087 0 175,356 184,400 198,440 14,040 200,358 235,387 249,427 14,040 I1I -15 IIII VARIANCE FY 2012/2013 FY 2013/2014 FY 2014/2015 FY2014/2015 ACTUALS ADOPTED PROPOSED VS. COST CENTER / CATEGORY @ 06/30/13 BUDGET BUDGET FY2013/2014 670 - BARNES PARK CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0 7,500 7,500 0 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS 15,063 18,726 18,726 0 PERSONNEL COSTS 90,580 112,180 114,730 2,550 670 - BARNES PARK TOTAL 105,643 138,406 140,956 2,550 680 -ARTS & RECREATION CENTER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 9,728 11,800 11,800 0 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS 21,805 25,565 25,565 (1) PERSONNEL COSTS 154,571 147,540 161,340 13,800 680 -ARTS & RECREATION CENTER TOTA 186,104 184,905 198,705 13,799 TOTAL RECREATION & COMM. SERV. 2,020,830 2,853,090 3,081,596 228,506 IIII W w PROJECTED REVENUE ALL FUNDS City of Baldwin Total Revenue by •: Type (includes Fiscal Years 2012/2013 Through VARIANCE FY2012/2013 FY2013/2014 FY2014/2015 FY2014/2015 ACTUALS ADOPTED PROJECTED VS. FUND FUND DESCRIPTION 0) 06/30/13 REVENUE REVENUE FY2013/2014 GENERAL FUND REVENUE: 100 GENERAL FUND OPERATING 100 GENERAL FUND ONE TIME REVENUE INTERNAL SERVICES FUNDS: 401 INFORMATION SERVICES 402 FLEET SERVICES 403 INTERNAL INSURANCE SUBTOTAL - INTERNAL SERVICES FUNDS: SPECIAL FUNDS REVENUE: 200 FUTURE DEVELOPMENT FUND 205 FEDERAL ASSET FORFEITURE 206 STATE ASSET FORFEITURE 207 LOCAL LAW ENF BLOCK GRANT 220 CDBG 221 HOME PROGRAM 222 CALHOME GRANT 223 EDA 230 AB 1696 231 AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT 234 PARK LAND & PUBLIC ART FEES 235 GENERAL PLAN FEE 240 GAS TAX 241 SURFACE TRANSP PROGRAM 242 TRAFFIC CONGEST RELIEF 243 BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN 244 PROPOSITION A 245 PROPOSITION C 246 AB939 INT WASTE MGMNT 247 OIL RECYCLING GRANT 249 STORM DRAINS /NPDS 250 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 251 STREET LIGHT & LANDSCAPE 252 PARKS MAINTENANCE 253 PROP A PARKS 254 MEASURE R LOCAL RETURN 260 SUMMER LUNCH 270 GRANTS FUND 271 POLICE GRANTS FUND 301 BUILDING RESERVE • r 23,747,883 24,538,400 25,177,270 638,870 751,762 1,000,000 0 (1,000,000) $ 24,499,645 $ 25,538,400 $ 25,177,270 $ (361,130) 735,076 832,929 836,929 4,000 1,001,852 1,017,295 1,080,520 63,225 2,029,029 2,621,162 2,624,962 3,800 $ 3,765,957 $ 4,471,386 $ 4 ;542;411 $ 71;025 26,003 10,000 10,000 0 170,215 306,000 306,000 0 10,772 3,600 3,600 0 36 100 100 0 1,082,280 2,259,416 2,259,416 0 138,247 2,526,760 2,526,760 0 18 330 330 0 2,734 27,000 27,000 0 73,829 60,600 60,600 0 92,917 97,900 97,900 0 210,288 101,800 101,800 0 88,899 70,800 70,800 0 1,644,892 1,939,084 1,939,084 0 1,234 1,200 1,200 0 263,549 2,000 7,000 5,000 108,289 200,000 500 (199,500) 1,437,086 1,236,400 1,236,400 0 1,053,179 1,018,285 1,018,285 0 351,031 319,700 319,700 0 21,584 30,000 30,000 0 72,798 50,100 50,100 0 10,802 12,430 12,430 0 1,722,427 1,778,187 1,784,787 6,600 800,775 817,066 816,134 (932) 0 64,791 140,422 75,631 787,136 701,360 788,805 87,445 159,977 200,166 205,237 5,071 5,687,266 9,694,206 9,694,206 0 437,431 608,394 608,394 0 678,123 0 0 0 $ 17,133,818 $ 24,137,674 $ 24,116,989 $ (20,685) IV-] FUND FUND DESCRIPTION SUBTOTAL GENERAL, INTERNAL SERV., & SPECIAL FUNDS: FINANCING AUTHORITY REVENUE: 601 DEBT SERVICE 610 COP LEASE PAYMENTS 625 GAS TAX DEBT SERVICE 635 BPFA /PM 2003 TAX ALLOC 637 BPFA /CBD 1990 RFNDNG LOAN 650 PENSION OBLIGATION BOND SUBTOTAL - FINANCING AUTHORITY SUCCESSOR AGENCY REVENUE: 800 RDA OBLIGATION RETIREMENT CAPITAL PROJECTS REVENUE 801 SG RIVER CAPITAL PRJ 802 PUENTE /MERCED CAPITAL PRJ 804 CNTRL BUSINESS DST CAPITAL PRJ 805 DELTA CAPITAL PRJ 806 SIERRA VISTA CAPITAL PRJ 825 MERGED AREA PROJECT FUND SUBTOTAL- CAPITAL PROJECTS DEBT SERVICE REVENUE 831 SG RIVER DEBT SERVICE 832 PUENTE /MERCED DEBT SERVICE 834 CNTRL BUSINESS DIST DEBT SERV 835 DELTA DEBT SERVICE 836 SIERRA VISTA DEBT SERVICE 837 BP MERGED 2000 REFINANCE SUBTOTAL -DEBT SERVICE LOW /MOD HOUSING REVENUE 890 LOW /MOD INCOME HOUSING SUBTOTAL - LOW /MOD HOUSING SUBTOTAL- SUCCESSOR AGENCY HOUSING AUTHORITY REVENUE: 901 HOUSING VOUCHER CHOICE 905 PUBLIC HOUSING 910 CIAP nillatiY11041101 ;L0 11 ' L[ 3A it�L�Il � TOTAL ALL REVENUE: FY2012/2013 FY2013/2014 FY2014/2015 ACTUALS ADOPTED PROJECTED R 06/30/13 REVENUE REVENUE VARIANCE FY2014/2015 vs. FY2013/2014 $ 45,399,420 $ 54,147,460 $ 53,836,670 $ (310,790) 505,345 540,070 540,970 900 682,430 684,580 677,880 (6,700) 402,103 401,770 400,950 (820) 77 0 0 0 4,851 0 0 0 1,598,572 1,654,490 1,709,820 55,330 $ 3,193,378 $ 3,280,910 $ 3,329,620 $ 48,710 IV-2 6,990,172 6,056,100 6,820,000 763,900 288,253 44,800 44,880 80 113,736 40,960 41,300 340 892,831 39,940 41,300 1,360 45,305 38,470 39,770 1,300 146,250 41,430 50,750 9,320 1,168,908 0 0 0 $ 2,655,283 $ 205,600 $ 218,000 $ 12,400 2,200,410 1,000,000 1,000,000 0 941,053 762,000 870,000 108,000 2,259,872 1,236,100 1,692,000 455,900 308,734 330,000 320,000 (10,000) 3,713,000 3,144,400 3,600,000 455,600 514,260 542,450 537,210 (5,240) $ 9,937,329 $ 7,014,950 $ 8,019,210 $ 1,004,260 164,070 0 70,000 70,000 $ 164,070 $ - $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 19,746,854 $ 13,276,650 $ 15,127,210 $ 1,850,560 5,284,461 5,222,000 5,292,000 70,000 47,078 44,840 44,840 0 11,222 33,750 33,750 0 $ 5,342,761 $ 5,300,590 $ 5,370,590 $ 70,000 $ 73,682,413 $ 76,005,610 $ 77,664,090 $ 1,658,480 IV-2 F-9 NkO-1 M- 1 *46vq-g NO a N a I tal 0 CITY OF BALD PARK FISCAL YEAR 2014/2015 R•'• ! EXPENDITURE ALL DEPARTMENTS ! (includes FUND GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES: 100 GENERAL FUND SUBTOTAL GENERAL FUND INTERNAL SERVICES FUNDS: 401 INFORMATION SERVICES 402 FLEET SERVICES 403 INTERNAL INSURANCE SUBTOTAL INTERNAL SERVICES FUNDS SPECIAL FUNDS EXPENDITURES: 205 FEDERAL ASSET FORFEITURE 206 STATE ASSET FORFEITURE 207 LOCAL LAW ENFORCE BLOCK GRANT 220 CDBG 221 HOME PROGRAM 223 EDA 230 AB1693 231 AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT 234 PARK LAND & PUBLIC ART FEES 235 GENERAL PLAN FEE 240 GAS TAX 241 SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM 242 TRAFFIC CONGESTION RELIEF 243 BICYCLE & PEDESTIAN SAFETY 244 PROPOSITION A 245 PROPOSITION C 246 AB939 INT WASTE MANAGEMENT 247 OIL RECYCLING GRANT 249 STORM DRAIN /NPDS 251 STREET LIGHT & LANDSCAPE 252 PARKS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 253 PROP A PARKS 254 MEASURE R LOCAL RETURN 260 SUMMER LUNCH PROGRAM 270 GRANTS FUND 271 POLICE GRANTS FUND 301 BUILDING RESERVE SUBTOTAL SPECIAL FUNDS • FY 2012/2013 ACTUALS (a) 06/30/13 23,588,395 ADOPTED BUDGET 24,441, 841 I •_,•• r 25,023,769 VARIANCE FY2014/2015 vs. FY2013/2014 581,928 $ 23,588,395 $ 24,441,841 $ 25,023,769 $ 581,928 736,643 832,267 853,027 20,760 1,081,985 1,015,015 1,077,735 62,720 1,316,320 2,770,088 2,600,929 (169,159) $ 3,134,948 $ 4,617,370 $ 4,531,691 $ (85,679) 364,977 480,250 480,250 0 2,485 10,000 10,000 0 0 2,400 2,400 0 1,250,953 2,227,635 2,331,405 103,770 133,811 2,526,665 2,528,600 1,935 10,579 166,462 167,602 1,140 49,725 22,000 22,000 0 2,577 685,114 165,114 (520,000) 187,465 20,000 20,000 0 38,434 36,030 40,060 4,030 2,419,117 2,737,350 2,784,196 46,846 0 678,000 678,000 0 251,870 170,000 170,000 0 223 280,000 100,000 (180,000) 1,104,804 1,456,372 1,364,591 (91,781) 2,856,132 2,008,585 1,044,615 (963,970) 255,038 379,133 360,263 (18,870) 10,372 23,000 23,000 (0) 94,272 47,995 51,405 3,410 1,755,499 1,896,020 1,927,554 31,534 800,775 809,152 832,049 22,897 63,632 64,801 76,780 11,979 778,360 1,039,002 1,055,712 16,710 159,977 199,826 206,706 6,880 5,370,431 9,700,286 9,719,946 19,660 613,011 753,314 765,042 11,728 682,430 0 0 0 $ 19,256,949 $ 28,419,393 $ 26,927,291 $ (1,492,102) SPECIAL FUNDS: $ 45,980,292 $ 57,478,604 $ 56,482,751 $ (995,853) V -1 All kiI! 601 DEBT SERVICE 610 COP LEASE PAYMENTS 625 GAS TAX DEBT SERVICE 630 BOND ISSUANCE SGR RFNCE 635 BPFA /PM 2003 TAX ALLOC 636 BPFA 1990 TAX ALLOC 650 PENSION OBLIGATION BOND SUBTOTAL FINANCING AUTHORITY SUCCESSOR AGENCY EXPENDITURES: 800 RDA OBLIGATION RETIREMENT ;i� \Jim \�:7; %iytl7�a�lill:7 801 SG RIVER CAPITAL PRJ 802 PUENTE /MERCED CAPITAL PRJ 803 W RAMONA CAPITAL PRJ 804 CNTRL BUSINESS DST CAPITAL PRJ 805 DELTA CAPITAL PRJ 806 SIERRA VISTA CAPITAL PRJ 825 MERGED AREA PROJECT FUND SUBTOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS DEBT SERVICE EXPENDITURES 831 SG RIVER DEBT SERVICE 832 PUENTE /MERCED DEBT SERVICE 833 VV RAiV1 OIVA DEB T SER V Il,E- 834 CNTRL BUSINESS DIST DEBT SERV 835 DELTA DEBT SERVICE 836 SIERRA VISTA DEBT SERVICE 837 BP MERGED 2000 REFINANCE SUBTOTAL DEBT SERVICE LOW /MOD HOUSING EXPENDITURES 890 LOW /MOD INCOME HOUSING ��i] ��i)t�1>■ �i]���lli�i [�7 �l [�11)�y I r! [N SUBTOTAL SUCCESSOR AGENCY HOUSING AUTHORITY EXPENDITURES: FY 2012/2013 FY 2013/2014 FY 2014/2015 ACTUALS ADOPTED PROPOSED Cad 06/30113 BUDGET BUDGET VARIANCE FY2014/2015 vs. FY2013/2014 503,401 505,920 506,820 900 680,130 684,780 679,580 (5,200) 402,028 403,720 402,900 (820) 510,000 0 0 0 330,000 0 0 0 325,000 0 0 0 1,599,159 1,654,490 1,709,620 55,130 $ 4,349,718 $ 3,248,910 $ 3,298,920 $ 50,010 6,990,172 6,056,100 6,820,000 763,900 144,553 56,960 44,880 (12,080) 53,856 48,620 41,300 (7,320) 110,268 0 0 0 243,342 62,400 41,300 (21,100) 3,826 40,720 39,770 (950) 281,045 70,010 50,750 (19,260) 857,777 0 0 0 $ 1,694,667 $ 278,710 $ 218,000 $ (60,710) 1,107,224 1,098,200 999,814 (98,386) 1,149,199 670,060 835,288 165,228 104,427 0 0 0 1,670,747 1,700,930 1,691,625 (9,305) 795,213 199,350 319,996 120,646 4,530,580 2,730,710 3,600,000 869,290 939,900 542,450 537,210 (5,240) $ 10,297,290 $ 6,941,700 $ 7,983,933 $ 1,042,233 878,160 0 3,200 3,200 $ 878,160 $ - $ 3,200 $ 3,200 $ 19,860,289 $ 13,276,511 $ 15,025,133 $ 1,748,623 901 HOUSING VOUCHER CHOICE 6,151,179 5,184,773 5,270,311 85,538 905 PUBLIC HOUSING 62,051 71,190 78,960 7,770 910 CIAP 11,222 13,140 13,140 0 SUBTOTAL HOUSING AUTHORITY $ 6,224,452 $ 5,269,103 $ 5,362,411 $ 93,308 TOTAL ALL EXPENDITURES $ 76,414,751 $ 79,273,127 $ 80,169,215 $ 896,088 m CITY OF FISCAL YEAR 2014/2015 PROPOSED EXPENDITURE BUDGET ALL DEPARTMENTS ALL (includes VARIANCE FY 2012/2013 FY 2013/2014 FY 201412015 FY2014/2015 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 76,414,751 79,273,127 80,169,215 896,088 V -3 ACTUALS ADOPTED PROPOSED VS. CATEGORY @ 06/30113 BUDGET BUDGET FY2013/2014 CAPITAL 10,202,249 17,005,754 15,341,634 (1,664,120) CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,269,220 7,453,080 7,170,085 (282,995) MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS 16,944,499 17,570,552 18,274,833 704,281 DEBT SERVICE 6,926,996 5,903,750 5,768,113 (135,637) PERSONNEL COSTS 22,402,785 22,710,418 23,983,167 1,272,749 TRANSFERS OUT 14,669,002 8,629,573 9,631,383 1,001,811 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 76,414,751 79,273,127 80,169,215 896,088 V -3 CITY OF BALDWIN PARK FISCAL YEAR 2014/2015 PROPOSED EXPENDITURE BUDGET ALL DEPARTMENTS t .- Transfers) VARIANCE FY 2012/2013 FY 2013/2014 FY 2014/2015 ,, ACTUALS ADOPTED PROPOSED vs. CATEGORY @ 06/30/13 BUDGET BUDGET FY2013/2014 ADMINISTRATION 3,099,312 4,707,332 4,630,336 (76,996) FINANCE 958,789 1,202,168 1,087,908 (114,260) NON - DEPARTMENTAL 27,105,016 18,052,298 19,871,613 1,819,315 POLICE 17,527,337 17,177,948 17,515,701 337,753 NEIGHBORHOOD SAFETY & SERVICES 303,843 1,228,689 1,157,524 (71,165) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 8,208,509 9,313,136 9,540,996 227,860 PUBLIC WORKS 16,795,133 24,315,492 22,879,757 (1,435,735) RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICE! 2,416,812 3,276,064 3,485,380 209,316 76,414,751 79,273,127 80,169,215 896,088 1 • -�.• r t - �_ _COMMUNITY_ -1 n eW�-.1 n11n1 1R 1WIAn1 /P UCVCLVPIVIEN I Y UDLI�. VVVRP�D NEIGHBORHOOD 12% 29% SAFETY & SERVICES 1% POLICE 22% RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES 4% NON- DEPARTMENTAL 25% r ADMINISTRATION FINANCE 6% 1% V -4 1J k: CITY OF BALDWIN •.. FISCAL YEAR 2014/2015 PROPOSED EXPENDITURE BUDGET TOTAL EXPENDITURES 3,099,312 4,707,332 4,630,336 (76,996) VARIANCE VARIANCE FY 2012/2013 FY 2013/2014 FY 2012/2013 FY 2013/2014 FY 2014/2015 FY2014/2015 ADOPTED PROPOSED ACTUALS ADOPTED PROPOSED VS. BUDGET COST CENTER @ 06/30/13 BUDGET BUDGET FY2013/2014 100 CITY COUNCIL 195,156 236,412 243,592 7,180 110 CEO'S OFFICE 316,495 342,553 327,311 (15,242) 120 CITY CLERK 71,275 133,061 170,541 37,480 130 CITYATTORNEY 248,195 262,500 281,500 19,000 140 INFORMATION SERVICES 405,439 413,278 445,068 31,790 141 SUPPORT SERVICES 317,399 370,718 358,298 (12,420) 150 PERSONNEL 383,327 422,984 450,774 27,790 160 RISK MNGMNT /INTERNAL INS 1,162,026 2,525,827 2,353,253 (172,574) TOTAL EXPENDITURES 3,099,312 4,707,332 4,630,336 (76,996) TOTAL EXPENDITURES 3,099,312 4,707,332 4,630,336 (76,996) ADMINISTRAT, In Ry 1:1 lK:D VARIANCE FY 2012/2013 FY 2013/2014 FY 2014/2015 FY2014/2015 ACTUALS ADOPTED PROPOSED VS. COST CENTER @ 06/30/13 BUDGET BUDGET FY2013/2014 100 GENERAL FUND 814,222 966,210 1,015,438 49,228 220 CDBG 17,037 702 732 31 221 HOME PROGRAM 4,590 503 508 5 240 GAS TAX 219 13,240 13,800 560 244 PROPOSITION A 15,104 0 0 0 245 PROPOSITION C 16,127 32,524 34,324 1,800 251 STREET LIGHT & LANDSCAPE 21,951 20,817 21,952 1,135 252 PARKS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 219 13,240 13,800 560 254 MEASURE R LOCAL RETURN 12,891 13,370 13,930 560 270 GRANTS FUND 17,092 20,000 20,000 0 401 INFORMATION SERVICES 706,184 790,486 810,976 20,490 402 FLEET SERVICES 438 26,500 27,610 1,110 403 INTERNAL INSURANCE 1,316,270 2,730,078 2,575,279 (154,800) 801 SG RIVER CAPITAL PRJ 42,243 7,610 7,030 (580) 802 PUENTE /MERCED CAPITAL PRJ 29,264 7,610 7,030 (580) 804 CNTRL BUSINESS DST CAPITAL PR, 112 6,760 7,030 270 805 DELTA CAPITAL PRJ 112 6,760 7,030 270 806 SIERRA VISTA CAPITAL PRJ 53,666 4,910 4,250 (660) 831 SG RIVER DEBT SERVICE 0 0 2,000 2,000 832 PUENTE /MERCED DEBT SERVICE 0 0 2,000 2,000 834 CNTRL BUSINESS DIST DEBT SERV 0 0 2,000 2,000 835 DELTA DEBT SERVICE 0 0 2,000 2,000 836 SIERRA VISTA DEBT SERVICE 0 32,000 2,000 (30,000) 890 LOW /MOD INCOME HOUSING 20,276 0 0 0 901 HOUSING VOUCHER CHOICE 11,295 14,014 39,619 25,605 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 3,099,312 4,707,332 4,630,336 (76,996) VI -1 VARIANCE FY 2012/2013 FY 2013/2014 FY 2014/2015 FY2014/2015 ACTUALS ADOPTED PROPOSED VS. COST CENTER @ 06/30/13 BUDGET BUDGET FY2013/2014 CAPITAL 102,615 140,000 107,100 (32,900) CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 503,101 614,500 597,300 (17,200) MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS 1,428,414 2,868,482 2,711,426 (157,056) PERSONNEL COSTS 1,065,182 1,050,650 1,214,510 163,860 TRANSFERS OUT 0 33,700 0 (33,700) TOTAL EXPENDITURES 3,099,312 4,707,332 4,630,336 (76,996) ADMINISTRAT, In Ry 1:1 lK:D VARIANCE FY 2012/2013 FY 2013/2014 FY 2014/2015 FY2014/2015 ACTUALS ADOPTED PROPOSED VS. COST CENTER @ 06/30/13 BUDGET BUDGET FY2013/2014 100 GENERAL FUND 814,222 966,210 1,015,438 49,228 220 CDBG 17,037 702 732 31 221 HOME PROGRAM 4,590 503 508 5 240 GAS TAX 219 13,240 13,800 560 244 PROPOSITION A 15,104 0 0 0 245 PROPOSITION C 16,127 32,524 34,324 1,800 251 STREET LIGHT & LANDSCAPE 21,951 20,817 21,952 1,135 252 PARKS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 219 13,240 13,800 560 254 MEASURE R LOCAL RETURN 12,891 13,370 13,930 560 270 GRANTS FUND 17,092 20,000 20,000 0 401 INFORMATION SERVICES 706,184 790,486 810,976 20,490 402 FLEET SERVICES 438 26,500 27,610 1,110 403 INTERNAL INSURANCE 1,316,270 2,730,078 2,575,279 (154,800) 801 SG RIVER CAPITAL PRJ 42,243 7,610 7,030 (580) 802 PUENTE /MERCED CAPITAL PRJ 29,264 7,610 7,030 (580) 804 CNTRL BUSINESS DST CAPITAL PR, 112 6,760 7,030 270 805 DELTA CAPITAL PRJ 112 6,760 7,030 270 806 SIERRA VISTA CAPITAL PRJ 53,666 4,910 4,250 (660) 831 SG RIVER DEBT SERVICE 0 0 2,000 2,000 832 PUENTE /MERCED DEBT SERVICE 0 0 2,000 2,000 834 CNTRL BUSINESS DIST DEBT SERV 0 0 2,000 2,000 835 DELTA DEBT SERVICE 0 0 2,000 2,000 836 SIERRA VISTA DEBT SERVICE 0 32,000 2,000 (30,000) 890 LOW /MOD INCOME HOUSING 20,276 0 0 0 901 HOUSING VOUCHER CHOICE 11,295 14,014 39,619 25,605 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 3,099,312 4,707,332 4,630,336 (76,996) VI -1 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 3,099,312 4,707,332 4,630,336 (76,996) VI -1 CITY OF . • / i • • FISCAL YEAR i 1 '•'• ! EXPENDITURE \ '\ TOTAL EXPENDITURES 958,789 1,202,168 1,087,908 (114,260) FY 2012/2013 VARIANCE FY 201212013 FY 2013/2014 FY 2014/2015 FY2014/2015 ACTUALS ADOPTED PROPOSED VS. COST CENTER 9,06/30/13 BUDGET BUDGET FY2013/2014 200 CITY TREASURER 24,271 23,307 25,337 2,030 210 FINANCE 934,518 1,178,861 1,062,571 (116,290) TOTAL EXPENDITURES 958,789 1,202,168 1,087,908 (114,260) TOTAL EXPENDITURES 958,789 1,202,168 1,087,908 (114,260) ►'M ►E FY 2012/2013 FY 2013/2014 VARIANCE FY2014/2015 FY 2012/2013 FY 2013/2014 FY 2014/2015 FY2014/2015 PROPOSED ACTUALS ADOPTED PROPOSED VS. COST CENTER @ 06/30/13 BUDGET BUDGET FY2013/2014 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 136,863 82,400 79,900 (2,500) MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS 66,178 130,128 131,328 1,200 PERSONNEL COSTS 755,748 852,640 876,680 24,040 TRANSFERS OUT 0 137,000 0 (137,000) TOTAL EXPENDITURES 958,789 1,202,168 1,087,908 (114,260) ►'M ►E 958,789 1,202,168 1,087,908 VI -2 FY 2012/2013 FY 2013/2014 FY 2014/2015 FY2014/2015 ACTUALS ADOPTED PROPOSED VS. COST CENTER @ 06/30/13 BUDGET BUDGET FY2013/2014 100 GENERAL FUND 578,854 771,950 635,050 (136,900) 220 CDBG 57,783 16,837 17,867 1,030 221 HOME PROGRAM 12,688 12,839 13,749 910 240 GAS TAX 8,014 9,849 10,229 380 244 PROPOSITION A 26,388 0 0 0 245 PROPOSITION C 25,620 72,903 78,193 5,290 246 AB939 INT WASTE MANAGEMENT 7,989 8,479 8,809 330 251 STREET LIGHT & LANDSCAPE 21,830 32,076 38,766 6,690 254 MEASURE R LOCAL RETURN 13,552 18,800 19,600 800 401 INFORMATION SERVICES 30,459 41,781 42,051 270 403 INTERNAL INSURANCE 50 13,100 13,040 (60) 801 SG RIVER CAPITAL PRJ 47,506 31,250 32,030 780 802 PUENTE /MERCED CAPITAL PRJ 368 27,640 28,450 810 804 CNTRL BUSINESS DST CAPITAL PRJ 368 27,640 28,450 810 805 DELTA CAPITAL PRJ 342 26,160 26,920 760 806 SIERRA VISTA CAPITAL PRJ 30,749 24,460 26,940 2,480 890 LOW /MOD INCOME HOUSING 19,773 0 0 0 901 HOUSING VOUCHER CHOICE 72,627 59,756 60,886 1,130 905 PUBLIC HOUSING 3,829 6,648 6,878 230 958,789 1,202,168 1,087,908 VI -2 CITY OF PARK FISCAL YEAR 2014/2015 PROPOSED EXPENDITURE BUDGE! TOTAL r NON-DEPARTMENTAL BY , • 19,871,613 1,819,315 BPFA /PM 2003 TAX ALLOC 330,000 VARIANCE FY 2012/2013 FY 2013/2014 FY 2014/2015 FY2014/2015 ACTUALS ADOPTED PROPOSED VS. COST CENTER @ 06/30/13 BUDGET BUDGET FY2013/2014 000 NO COST CENTER 26,343,405 17,208,410 19,014,713 1,806,303 299 NON - DEPARTMENTAL 761,611 843,888 856,900 13,012 TOTAL r NON-DEPARTMENTAL BY , • 19,871,613 1,819,315 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 27,105,016 18,052,298 19,871,613 1,819,315 BPFA /PM 2003 TAX ALLOC 330,000 0 VARIANCE VARIANCE FY 2012/2013 FY 2013/2014 FY 20/4/2015 FY201412015 FY 2014/2015 ACTUALS ADOPTED PROPOSED VS. COST CENTER @ 06/30/13 BUDGET BUDGET FY2013/2014 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100,674 68,150 90,750 22,600 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS 4,778,590 3,854,630 4,608,960 754,330 DEBT SERVICE 6,919,158 5,895,650 5,767,533 (128,117) PERSONNEL COSTS 645,940 714,538 706,300 (8,238) TRANSFERS OUT 14,660,654 7,519,330 8,698,070 1,178,740 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 27,105,016 18,052,298 19,871,613 1,819,315 635 BPFA /PM 2003 TAX ALLOC 330,000 0 0 VARIANCE 636 BPFA 1990 TAX ALLOC FY 2012/2013 FY 2013/2014 FY 2014/2015 FY2014/2015 650 PENSION OBLIGATION BOND ACTUALS ADOPTED PROPOSED VS. COST CENTER @ 06/30/13 BUDGET BUDGET FY2013/2014 100 GENERAL FUND 1,704,168 818,888 831,900 13,012 220 CDBG 523,401 505,920 506,820 900 221 HOME PROGRAM 20,000 0 0 0 230 AB1693 14,805 10,000 10,000 0 240 GAS TAX 403,804 401,720 400,900 (820) 244 PROPOSITION A 4,903 0 0 0 245 PROPOSITION C 4,903 10,000 10,000 0 254 MEASURE R LOCAL RETURN 4,903 5,000 5,000 0 301 BUILDING RESERVE 682,430 0 0 0 601 DEBT SERVICE 503,401 505,920 506,820 900 610 COP LEASE PAYMENTS 680,130 684,780 679,580 (5,200) 625 GAS TAX DEBT SERVICE 402,028 403,720 402,900 (820) 630 BOND ISSUANCE SGR RFNCE 510,000 0 0 0 635 BPFA /PM 2003 TAX ALLOC 330,000 0 0 0 636 BPFA 1990 TAX ALLOC 325,000 0 0 0 650 PENSION OBLIGATION BOND 1,599,159 1,654,490 1,709,620 55,130 VI -3 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 27,105,016 18,052,298 19,871,613 1,819,315 VI-4 COST CENTER FY 2012/2013 ACTUALS @ 06/30/13 FY 2013/2014 ADOPTED BUDGET FY 2014/2015 PROPOSED BUDGET VARIANCE FY2014/2015 VS. FY201312014 800 RDA OBLIGATION RETIREMENT 6,990,172 6,056,100 6,820,000 763,900 801 SG RIVER CAPITAL PRJ 0 12,110 0 (12,110) 802 PUENTE /MERCED CAPITAL PRJ 0 7,620 0 (7,620) 803 W RAMONA CAPITAL PRJ 110,268 0 0 0 804 CNTRL BUSINESS DST CAPITAL PRJ 208,287 22,420 0 (22,420) 805 DELTA CAPITAL PRJ 0 2,210 0 (2,210) 806 SIERRA VISTA CAPITAL PRJ 134,793 28,560 0 (28,560) 825 MERGED AREA PROJECT FUND 857,777 0 0 0 831 SG RIVER DEBT SERVICE 1,107,224 1,098,200 997,814 (100,386) 832 PUENTE /MERCED DEBT SERVICE 1,149,199 670,060 833,288 163,228 833 W RAMONA DEBT SERVICE 104,427 0 0 0 834 CNTRL BUSINESS DIST DEBT SERV 1,670,747 1,700,930 1,689,625 (11,305) 835 DELTA DEBT SERVICE 795,213 199,350 317,996 118,646 836 SIERRA VISTA DEBT SERVICE 4,530,580 2,698,710 3,598,000 899,290 837 BP MERGED 2000 REFINANCE 939,900 542,450 537,210 (5,240) 890 LOW /MOD INCOME HOUSING 785,052 0 1,000 1,000 901 HOUSING VOUCHER CHOICE (2,880) 0 0 0 910 CIAP 11,222 13,140 13,140 0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 27,105,016 18,052,298 19,871,613 1,819,315 VI-4 eTV i -. 0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17,527,337 17,177,948 17,515,701 337,753 POLICE BY CATEGORY VARIANCE COST CENTER FY 2012/2013 ACTUALS @ 06/30/13 FY 201312014 ADOPTED BUDGET FY 2014/2015 PROPOSED BUDGET VARIANCE FY2014/2015 VS. FY2013/2014 300 POLICE CHIEF 734,060 806,308 1,000,001 193,693 310 POLICE ADMINISTRATION 1,455,155 1,521,774 1,303,116 (218,658) 320 COMMUNICATIONS 1,101,344 1,161,639 1,228,499 66,860 330 RECORDS 420,015 301,281 366,611 65,330 340 PATROL 7,932,830 8,151,307 8,390,747 239,440 350 TRAFFIC 1,911,374 1,509,642 1,410,333 (99,309) 360 INVESTIGATIONS 3,577,974 3,311,598 3,401,995 90,397 370 POLICE JAIL 348,068 361,400 361,400 0 380 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS 46,517 53,000 53,000 0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17,527,337 17,177,948 17,515,701 337,753 POLICE BY CATEGORY VARIANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17,527,337 17,177,948 17,515,701 337,753 VARIANCE FY 2012/2013 FY 2013/2014 FY 2014/2015 FY201412015 ACTUALS ADOPTED PROPOSED VS. FY 2012/2013 FY 2013/2014 FY 2014/2015 FY2014/2015 FY2013/2014 ACTUALS ADOPTED PROPOSED VS. COST CENTER @ 06130/13 BUDGET BUDGET FY2013/2014 CAPITAL 340,335 515,504 586,264 70,760 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,476,697 876,440 856,440 (20,000) MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS 1,556,715 1,738,484 1,772,864 34,380 PERSONNEL COSTS 14,153,590 14,047,520 14,300,133 252,613 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17,527,337 17,177,948 17,515,701 337,753 VARIANCE FY 2012/2013 FY 2013/2014 FY 2014/2015 FY201412015 ACTUALS ADOPTED PROPOSED VS. TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17, 527, 337 17,177, 948 17, 515,701 337,753 VI -5 COST CENTER @ 06/30113 BUDGET BUDGET FY2013/2014 100 GENERAL FUND 16,514,269 15,906,314 16,215,539 309,225 205 FEDERAL ASSET FORFEITURE 364,977 480,250 480,250 0 206 STATE ASSET FORFEITURE 2,485 10,000 10,000 0 207 LOCAL LAW ENFORCE BLOCK GRANT 0 2,400 2,400 0 220 CDBG 32,595 25,670 42,470 16,800 271 POLICE GRANTS FUND 613,011 753,314 765,042 11,728 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17, 527, 337 17,177, 948 17, 515,701 337,753 VI -5 CITY OF BALDWIN •A' FISCAL YEAR 201412015 PROPOSED EXPENDITURE BUDGJ ► [ciao • •� : • TOTAL EXPENDITURES 303,843 1,228,689 1,157,524 (71,165) FY 2013/2014 FY 2014/2015 FY2014/2015 VARIANCE ADOPTED FY 2012/2013 FY 2013/2014 FY 2014/2015 FY2014/2015 BUDGET ACTUALS ADOPTED PROPOSED VS. COST CENTER @ 06/30/13 BUDGET BUDGET FY2013/2014 390 OTHER PUBLIC SAFETY SERVI 0 817,856 692,161 (125,695) 391 CODE ENFORCMENT 302,418 297,653 347,213 49,560 392 PARKING ENFORCEMENT 1,425 113,180 118,150 4,970 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 303,843 1,228,689 1,157,524 (71,165) TOTAL EXPENDITURES 303,843 1,228,689 1,157,524 (71,165) 1Tl_1 TT_P SI0 FY 2012/2013 FY 2013/2014 FY 2014/2015 FY2014/2015 VARIANCE ADOPTED FY 2012/2013 FY 201312014 FY 2014/2015 FY2014/2015 BUDGET ACTUALS ADOPTED PROPOSED VS. COST CENTER @ 06/30/13 BUDGET BUDGET FY2013/2014 CAPITAL 0 45,000 45,000 0 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 9,660 794,158 668,463 (125,695) MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS 80,352 92,591 107,491 14,900 PERSONNEL COSTS 213,831 296,940 336,570 39,630 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 303,843 1,228,689 1,157,524 (71,165) 1Tl_1 TT_P SI0 FY 2012/2013 FY 2013/2014 FY 2014/2015 FY2014/2015 ACTUALS ADOPTED PROPOSED VS. COST CENTER @ 06130/13 BUDGET BUDGET FY2013/2014 100 GENERAL FUND 149,904 1,031,016 925,391 (105,625) 220 CDBG 153,939 152,672 187,132 34,460 231 AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT 0 45,000 45,000 0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 303,843 1,228,689 1,157,524 (71,165) VI -6 • ' 1 :I • ' i UsTRIMMOM !' COMMUNITY 1�l1�ltT'iL VI -7 FY 2012/2013 FY 2013/2014 FY 201412015 FY2014/2015 ACTUALS ADOPTED PROPOSED VS. COST CENTER @ 06/30/13 BUDGET BUDGET FY2013/2014 000 NO COST CENTER 645 0 0 0 400 COMMUNITY DEV DIRECTOR 161,323 202,036 182,206 (19,830) 405 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 0 0 85,680 410 FEDERALLY ASSISTED HOUSING* 5,785,561 4,805,998 4,816,978 10,980 420 CDBG 721,208 3,226,148 3,290,321 64,173 430 BUSINESS LOAN PROG /EDA 567,333 160,116 160,316 200 440 PLANNING 389,588 341,605 4372865 96,260 450 BUILDING & SAFETY 451,527 455,744 489,101 33;357 470 COMMUNITY DEV ADMIN 131,324 121,488 78,528 (42,960) TOTAL EXPENDITURES 8,208,509 9,313,136 9,540,996 227,860 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BY CATEGORY VARIANCE FY 2012/2013 FY 2013/2014 FY 2014/2015 FY2014/2015 ACTUALS ADOPTED PROPOSED VS. COST CENTER @ 06/30113 BUDGET BUDGET FY2013/2014 CAPITAL 615,684 62,900 62,900 0 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 214,888 2,193,594 2,170,094 (23,500) MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS 5,925,934 5,615,842 5,620,599 4,757 PERSONNEL COSTS 1,452,003 1,361,500 1,587,689 226,189 TRANSFERS OUT 0 79,300 0 (79,300) TOTAL EXPENDITURES 8,208,509 9,313,136 9,441,282 128,146 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BY FUND VARIANCE FY 2012/2013 FY 2013/2014 FY 2014/2015 FY2014/2015 ACTUALS ADOPTED PROPOSED VS. COST CENTER @ 06/30/13 BUDGET BUDGET FY201312014 100 GENERAL FUND 746,108 912,344 917,481 5,137 220 CDBG 303,230 342,071 368,834 26,763 221 HOME PROGRAM 96,533 2,513,324 2,513,948 624 223 EDA 10,579 166,462 167,602 1,140 231 AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT 2,577 80,114 80,114 0 234 PARK LAND & PUBLIC ART FEES 0 20,000 20,000 0 235 GENERAL PLAN FEE 38,434 36,030 40,060 4,030 270 GRANTS FUND 664,606 5,416 25,076 19,660 403 INTERNAL INSURANCE 0 26,910 30,210 3,300 VI -7 ♦1.mI�1�1+� EXPENDITURES 9,441,282 128,1449 VI -8 COST CENTER FY 2012/2013 ACTUALS @ 06/30/13 FY 201312014 ADOPTED BUDGET FY 2014/2015 PROPOSED BUDGET FY2014/2015 VS. FY201312014 801 SG RIVER CAPITAL PRJ 54,804 5,990 5,820 (170) 802 PUENTE /MERGED CAPITAL PRJ 24,224 5,750 5,820 70 804 CNTRL BUSINESS DST CAPITAL PRJ 34,575 5,580 5,820 240 805 DELTA CAPITAL PRJ 3,372 5,590 5,820 230 806 SIERRA VISTA CAPITAL PRJ 61,837 12,080 19,560 7,480 890 LOW /MOD INCOME HOUSING 53,059 0 2,200 2,200 901 HOUSING VOUCHER CHOICE 6,070,137 5,110,983 5,166,165 55,182 905 PUBLIC HOUSING 44,434 64,492 66,752 2,260 EXPENDITURES 9,441,282 128,1449 VI -8 A . E : i • RVIRTERMON TOTAL EXPENDITURES 16,795,133 24,315,492 22,879,757 (1,435,735) FY 2012/2013 FY 2013/2014 FY 2014/2015 FY2014/2015 FY 2012/2013 FY 2013/2014 ACTUALS ADOPTED PROPOSED VS. ADOPTED COST CENTER @ 06/30/13 BUDGET BUDGET FY2013/2014 000 NO COST CENTER 8,348 0 0 0 500 PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 165,430 333,325 348,295 14,970 510 ENGINEERING 318,648 371,319 381,759 10,440 520 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 9,441,297 15,784,723 14,422,783 (1,361,940) 530 LIGHTING MAINTENANCE 655,664 654,300 644,300 (10,000) 540 WASTE MNG /ENVIRO SERV 283,919 285,197 315,237 30,040 550 TRAFFIC CONTROL 201,427 240,141 231,191 (8,950) 551 ASPHALT 212,542 154,931 335,621 180,690 552 STREET SWEEPING 313,473 693,659 174,249 (519,410) 560 LANDSCAPE 560,254 844,896 920,529 75,633 561 TREES 231,308 269,331 288,911 19,580 562 IRRIGATION 164,248 185,300 188,170 2,870 570 GRAFFITI ABATEMENT 320,754 461,206 526,389 65,183 571 COURT REFERRAL 233,717 239,131 244,814 5,683 580 TRANSIT SERVICES 1,130,222 1,330,330 1,232,330 (98,000) 581 TRANSIT FACILITY MAINT 139,879 178,616 188,456 9,840 590 FLEET SERV - GENERAL 982,840 929,140 455,250 (473,890) 591 FLEET SERV - POLICE 27,665 0 525,250 525,250 595 FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 1,403,498 1,359,947 1,456,223 96,276 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 16,795,133 24,315,492 22,879,757 (1,435,735) TOTAL EXPENDITURES 16, 795,133 24,315,492 22,879,757 (1,435,735) VARIANCE VARIANCE FY 2012/2013 FY 2013/2014 FY 2014/2015 FY2014/2015 FY 2014/2015 ACTUALS ADOPTED PROPOSED VS. COST CENTER @ 06/30/13 BUDGET BUDGET FY2013/2014 CAPITAL 9,143,615 16,242,350 14,540,370 (1,701,980) CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,558,099 2,537,703 2,430,503 (107,200) MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS 2,730,021 2,860,262 2,896,362 36,100 PERSONNEL COSTS 2,355,050 2,531,680 2,794,326 262,646 TRANSFERS OUT 8,348 143,497 218,196 74,699 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 16, 795,133 24,315,492 22,879,757 (1,435,735) VI -9 VARIANCE FY 2012/2013 FY 2013/2014 FY 2014/2015 FY2014/2015 ACTUALS ADOPTED PROPOSED VS. COST CENTER @ 06/30/13 BUDGET BUDGET FY2013/2014 100 GENERAL FUND 1,060,040 1,182,028 1,313,673 131,645 220 CDBG 123,969 1,144,087 1,145,007 920 231 AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT 0 560,000 40,000 (520,000) 234 PARK LAND & PUBLIC ART FEES 187,465 0 0 0 240 GAS TAX 2,004,801 2,310,541 2,357,267 46,726 241 SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM 0 678,000 678,000 0 242 TRAFFIC CONGESTION RELIEF 251,870 170,000 170,000 0 243 BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN 223 280,000 100,000 (180,000) VI -9 VARIANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES 16,795,133 24,315,492 22,879,757 (1,435,735) Vl'l0 FY 2012/2013 FY 2013/2014 FY 2014/2015 FY2014/2015 ACTUALS ADOPTED PROPOSED VG. COST CENTER @ 06/30/13 BUDGET BUDGET /201 244 PROPOSITION A 956,239 1,344,340 1,249,999 (94,341) 245 PROPOSITION 2.704.124 1.877.570 899.840 (077.730) 246 AB838|NT WASTE MANAGEMENT 247.049 370.054 351.454 (19.200) 247 OIL RECYCLING GRANT 10.372 23.000 23.000 O 249 STDRMDRA{N/NPOS 94.272 47.995 51.405 3.410 251 STREET LIGHT &LANDSCAPE 1.711.718 1.843.127 1.866.836 23.709 252 PARKS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 800.556 795.012 818.249 22.337 253 PROP APARKS 63.832 64.801 76.780 11.979 254 MEASURE R LOCAL RETURN 743.085 807.832 1.013.182 15.350 270 GRANTS FUND 4.688.733 0.874.870 0.874.870 O 402 FLEET SERVICES 1.043.217 950.865 1.050.125 89.460 801 HOUSING AUTHORITY O 20 20 O 905 PUBLIC HOUSING 13.788 50 50 O TOTAL EXPENDITURES 16,795,133 24,315,492 22,879,757 (1,435,735) Vl'l0 CITY OF BALDWIN PARK FISCAL YEAR 2014/2015 REVISED PROPOSED EXPENDITURE BUDGET VARIANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,416,812 3,276,064 3,485,380 209,316 FY 201212013 FY 2013/2014 FY 2014/2015 FY201412015 FY 2012/2013 FY 2013/2014 ACTUALS ADOPTED PROPOSED VS. ADOPTED COST CENTER @ 06/30/13 BUDGET BUDGET FY2013/2014 600 RECREATION & COMM SERV DIR 242,400 248,798 259,868 11,070 610 RECREATION SERVICES 1,156,675 1,803,987 1,920,839 116,852 630 SENIOR SERVICES CENTER 214,620 244,796 258,476 13,680 640 FAMILY SERVICE CENTER 92,318 113,890 115,640 1,750 650 CHILDRENS SERVICES 217,692 300,895 338,969 38,074 660 TEEN CENTER /SKATE PARK 200,358 235,387 249,427 14,040 670 BARNES PARK 106,645 143,406 143,456 50 680 ARTS & RECREATION CENTER 186,104 184,905 198,705 13,800 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,416,812 3,276,064 3,485,380 209,316 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,416,812 3,276,064 3,485,380 209,316 VARIANCE FY 2012/2013 FY 2013/2014 VARIANCE FY2014/2015 FY 2012/2013 FY 2013/2014 FY 2014/2015 FY2014/2015 PROPOSED ACTUALS ADOPTED PROPOSED VS. COST CENTER @ 06130113 BUDGET BUDGET FY2013/2014 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 269,238 286,135 275,135 (11,000) MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS 386,133 418,233 422,883 4,650 PERSONNEL COSTS 1,761,441 1,854,950 2,072,245 217,295 TRANSFERS OUT 0 716,746 715,117 (1,629) TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,416,812 3,276,064 3,485,380 209,316 VARIANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,416,812 3,276,064 3,485,380 209,316 VI -I 1 FY 2012/2013 FY 2013/2014 FY 2014/2015 FY2014/2015 ACTUALS ADOPTED PROPOSED VS. COST CENTER @ 06/30/13 BUDGET BUDGET FY2013/2014 100 GENERAL FUND 2,020,830 2,853,090 3,081,596 228,506 220 CDBG 38,999 39,677 42,227 2,550 230 AB1693 34,920 12,000 12,000 0 240 GAS TAX 2,279 2,000 2,000 0 244 PROPOSITION A 102,170 112,032 114,592 2,560 245 PROPOSITION C 15,358 15,589 22,259 6,670 254 MEASURE R LOCAL RETURN 3,949 4,000 4,000 0 260 SUMMER LUNCH PROGRAM 159,977 199,826 206,706 6,880 402 FLEET SERVICES 38,330 37,850 0 (37,850) TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,416,812 3,276,064 3,485,380 209,316 VI -I 1 F] 0 RIP MW-.A E WIA �� ^ ��� � \��� \ \ \� � \ \ \��\� ^ \` *FY 2O14/2O15 Include 2 new positions and 14 part time positions that are working full time hours being reclassified to full time positions. YU-1 2012/2013 2013/2014 2014/2015 Full Time Full Time Full Time Positions Positions Positions Sworn* 77 78 78 Non Sworn 22 18 21 Police Totals 99 96 99 Tiscal Year 201412015 Includes 9 Frozen Sworn Positions Community Development 18 12 17 Public Works 25 29 32 Recreation & Community Services 12 9 10 *Totals 175 169 185 Full Time Personnel Cost 2012/2013 2013/2014 2014/2015 by Department Adopted Adopted Proposed Administration $ 1,070,740 940,360 $ 1,170,920 Finance 776,764 789,140 871,990 Non-Departmental (Retiree Health) 684,396 714,538 706,300 Police 15,204,290 13,861,270 14,211,183 Neighborhood Safety & Services 0 163,180 217,630 Community Development 1,633,960 1,142,910 1,533,800 Public Works 2,019,590 2,285,310 2,595,790 Recreation & Community Sery 1,108,160 907,490 1,027,400 Total Full Time Personnel Cost $ 22,497,900 $ 20,804,198 $ 22,335,013 Total Part Time Personnel Cost $ 1,796,620 $ 1,906,220 $ 1,648,154 Total Full Time & Part Time Personnel $ 24,294,520 $ 22,710,418 $ 23,983,167 *FY 2O14/2O15 Include 2 new positions and 14 part time positions that are working full time hours being reclassified to full time positions. YU-1 City • Baldwin Park FY 2014/2015 Proposed Budget Position Control Table CC Position 2012/2013 Positions 2013/2014 Positions 2014/2015 Positions 100 Elected Officers 7 7 7 Total FTE - 100 City Council 7 7 7 110 Chief Executive Officer Executive Secretary Administrative Clerk 11 Administrative Clerk 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 Total FTE - 110 CEO'S OFFICE 2 2 2 120 Chief Deputy City Clerk Deputy City Clerk Total FTE - 120 CITY CLERK 0 0 V 0 1 1 1 0 1 140 Information Systems Supervisor Information Systems Analyst 1 1 0 1 1 0 Total FTE - 140 INFO SERV 2 1 1 141 Imaging Specialist Administrative Clerk 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 Total FTE - 141 SUPPORT SERV 1 1 2 Human Resources Manager Human Resources Analyst 11 Human Resources Technician 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 Total FTE - 150 PERSONNEL 2 2 3 210 Finance Director Assistant Accounting Manager Accountant Management Assistant Senior Finance Clerk Finance Clerk 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 Total FTE - 210 FINANCE 7 7 8 300 Police Chief Captain Executive Secretary 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Total FTE - 300 POLICE CHIEF 3 4 4 310 Lieutenant Sergeant Lab Technician (Police Tech.) Records Specialist 11 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 Total FTE - 310 POLICE ADMIN 5 5 3 V11-2 CC Position 2012/2013 Positions 2013/2014 Positions 2014/2015 Positions 320 Dispatch Supervisor Dispatcher 1 9 1 9 1 10 Total IFTE - 320 COMMUNICATIONS 10 10 11 330 Records Supervisor Records Specialist 11 1 5 1 2 1 3 Total IFTE - 330 RECORDS 6 3 4 340 Lieutenant Sergeant Police Officer* 1 7 42 2 7 42 2 8 42 Total IFTE - 340 PATROL 50 51 52 *FY 2014-2015 Includes 9 Frozen Police Officer Positions. 350 Police Officer 5 5 5 Total IFTE - 350 TRAFFIC 5 5 5 360 Lieutenant Sergeant Detective Community Service Officer Total IFTE - 360 INVESTIGATIONS 1 2 14 1 19 0 2 14 1 18 1 2 14 2 20 391 Lead Code Enforcement Officer Administrative Clerk 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 Total FTE - 391 CODE ENFORCEIVINT 1 1 2 392 Parking Enforcement Officer 1 1 1 Total IFTE - 392 PARKING ENFORCEMENT 1 1 1 400 Community Development Director 1 1 1 Total IFTE - 400 COMM DEV DIR 1 1 1 405 Economic Projects Coordinator 0 0 1 Total IFTE - 405 ECONOMIC DEVELOP 0 0 1 410 Housing Program Coordinator 1 1 1 Total IFTE - 410 HOUSING 1 1 1 420 Housing Manager Administrative Analyst Housing Inspector Senior Housing Specialist Housing Specialist Housing Technician 1 1 1 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 2 1 1 0 1 1 4 1 Total IFTE - 420 CDBG 6 5 8 V11-3 CC Position 2012/2013 Positions 201312014 Positions 2014/2015 Positions 440 City Planner Associate Planner Assistant Planner Administrative Clerk 11 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 Total IFTE - 440 PLANNING 4 1 2 450 Supervising Plan-Check Engineer Building Inspector Construction Clerk 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Total IFTE - 450 BUILDING & SAFETY 4 4 4 470 Sr. Redevelopment Project Coordinator 1 0 0 Total FTE - 470 COMM DEV ADMIN 1 0 0 500 Public Works Director Administrative Clerk 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 Total IFTE - 500 PUBLIC WKS DIR 2 2 2 510 Assistant Engineer 2 2 2 Total IFTE - 510 ENGINEERING 2 2 2 520 Associate Engineer 1 1 1 Total IFTE - 520 CAPITAL IMPIRV 1 1 1 540 Public Works Operations Supervisor AB 939 Specialist (Executive Secretary) 1 1 1 1 1 1 — Total IFTE - 540 WST MNG/ENVIRO 2 2 2 550 Senior Maintenance Worker 1 1 1 Total IFTE - 550 TRAFFIC CONTIR 1 1 1 551 Senior Maintenance Worker Maintenance Worker 11 Maintenance Worker 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 Total IFTE - 551 ASPHALT 1 1 3 552 Street Sweeper Operator Senior Maintenance Worker Maintenance Worker 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 0 0 Total IFTE - 552 ST SWEEPING 4 4 2 560 Senior Maintenance Worker Maintenance Worker 11 Maintenance Worker 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 1 1 1 Total IFTE - 560 LANDSCAPE 3 3 3 561 Maintenance Worker 11 Maintenance Worker 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Total IFTE - 561 TREES 2 2 2 V114 cc Position 2012/2013 Positions 201312014 Positions 2014/2015 Positions 570 Senior Maintenance Worker 2 2 2 571 Senior Maintenance Worker 1 1 1 590 Senior Equipment Mechanic 1 1 1 595 Senior Maintenance Worker 0 0 1 600 Director of Rec. & Comm. Services 1 1 1 Program Coordinator Administrative Clerk 11 1 0 1 0 *Total 175 169 185 *FY 2014/2015 Include 2 new positions and 14 part time positions that are working full time hours being reclassified to full time positions. CITY OF BALDWIN •.- Grand Total All Departments $ 1,648,154 0) q mo r, 10 �D ID 0 oc� C� ID 't a 0 CY) rl' . u- 0 a C, � In It 10 m r U CL Q m (L > (L 0 C 0 E E U- p LL LL 0 4a r 0 U- c L m Va u 0 eu E v Co ~ v LL 0 41 U- r m a) r E c M 0 0 00 of M L. tw M E 0 0 a + u = U U- C V) V) L C C 0 0 V) 0 CL Q) E v E p -V Z c m CL Ql U. >. r 71- c 4- 0 m 0 m 10 01 00 — Lo I",, lz� C� llz� `� lz� C� cl� Lr) li ID 0 of V) V) cc 'r 0 r1l ON) ON L o0 0 0 0 ,o 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 'a 0 0 0 0 m m 0 c m C Vi — - to .-1 r, m 'yt C: y3, c c a: c a r- C: L c w cu ,3 W 7f] Cw Do :0) (D (D (D (D m (D 0 (wD o Z 0 U M: T: oo N 0 0 0 V1 `4 cr) 0) lD 'T 0 0 m to r, 00 r, 10 01 Cl m cl� V N m oo Lr m 4T 10 rl) 6 Ll� - m ) 0 O O o o Lr) N C) o 0 oo o LD m <O) () N a) 0 o m H r, lc� � ^ L'i ; cF ry1 to Lr) lr) M r1 M :T lD 'r tD Ln ID ID Ln LI) m lD lD Ln Ln 0 re� Lo 'CO4 Ln m a' Ln �q 00 m rLA4 Ln c N F- -2o U 0) (U 6 0 0 w 0 0 C �: " LL V C 0 1-- 0 0) W a "i 0 0 CL 0 In LL C v c m cc E a < m O E t m CL WHIM o o C, u v C3 E 0 w 0) E u -0 lu 0 u u w 71 -T o 0) E cr E < U C n 0 (U IL) c 0 0 Q 0 N y -6 -.11 0 OC O 0 S OD w 0 0 S E < C) o 0 0 u N m m �o rl co 0) o 0 o m -;t 0 oo o o o 0 o o 0 o z Q) (D (D (D (D (D (D (9 (D (D c o U: M I- N oo LD - m -q 0 m 0 o 'T m m Lo Lr) m r, r, c� 0 ryi 0 L'i oa) o m ul O' N 'r ry) m N oo to a) N m m ll m lx� LD c� m O m n oo ul IT n m m n m Ci 'Ict � u1 m o 0 o a) o m o m -q m 'T Ln Iz m m m 'r a m Ln 0 re� Lo 'CO4 Ln m a' Ln �q 00 m rLA4 Ln c N F- -2o U 0) (U 6 0 0 w 0 0 C �: " LL V C 0 1-- 0 0) W a "i 0 0 CL 0 In LL C v c m cc E a < m O E t m CL WHIM u v C3 E 0 w 0) E u -0 lu 0 u u w 71 -T 0) E cr E < U C n 0 (U IL) c 0 0 0 N y -6 OC O 0 S OD w 0 0 S E < 0 u N m m �o rl co 0) 0 - - -A 1 m -;t Ln 0 re� Lo 'CO4 Ln m a' Ln �q 00 m rLA4 Ln c N F- -2o U 0) (U 6 0 0 w 0 0 C �: " LL V C 0 1-- 0 0) W a "i 0 0 CL 0 In LL C v c m cc E a < m O E t m CL WHIM Unflix"- 4C., AL 41 ITEM 1', Pr% The Mayor and City Council are required to adopt a budget annually for each fiscal year for the City. In addition, they must also adopt budgets for the Successor Agency, the Housing Authority and the Financing Authority where they also sit as Board Members. Attached are copies of the proposed budgets for Fiscal Year 2014/15 and the Resolutions adopting them. full : Pi : I 1- 011`1 General Fund $25,023,769 Other Funds Internal Service Funds 4,531,691 Special Revenue Funds 26,927,291 Financing Authority 3,298,920 Housing Authority 5,362,411 Successor Agency $ 15,025,133 111� That the Mayor and City Council approve the City, respective Agency and Authority Budgets for Fiscal Year 2014/15 by adopting City Resolution No. 2014-025, Financing Authority Resolution No. 2014-002, Housing Authority Resolution No. 2014-003 and Successor Agency Resolution No. 2014-003 Staff Report for Fiscal Year 2014/15 Budget Adoption Page 2 of 3 LEGAL REVIEW None Required The Mayor and City Council must adopt a budget each fiscal year for the City and its respective Agency and Authorities to operate. The Acting Executive Manager and Director of Finance met initially with each member of the Executive Team to review their departmental budgets and their various requests. From those meetings a proposed budget was assembled for the Mayor and City Council to review and consider. The Mayor and Members of the City Council held initial study sessions on June 10th and I Ith. A third session was held on June 24th. During these sessions, staff was asked various questions and was asked to provide additional information and alternatives. At the meeting of June 24th, the Mayor and City Council gave staff final directions on the changes they wanted to the original proposed budget. Those changes have been incorporated into the attached documents. The theme for the next budget year is "Replace, Restore, and Revive''. The objectives of this budget are to replace key outdated equipment and vehicles, restore several levels and revive the spirit of the staff and community. The proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2014/15 is $80,169,215. The City's General Fund budget is proposed to be $25,023,769. This is an increase of $581,928 or 2.4% over last year's budget. It provides for no layoffs and some increases in service levels. The proposed budget has a projected surplus of $153,501 and a projected ending General Fund Balance of $6.376 million. The proposed budget restores two positions in Community Development that had to be eliminated several years ago due to the economic downturn and the elimination of the Redevelopment Agency. The Associate Planner will allow for a quicker turn around in plans and in answering questions about development. The Economic Project Coordinator will allow the City to once again be proactive in economic development. In addition, two part-time positions are also proposed in Planning and in Building to allow for greater efficiency and better service to the public at the counter. Public Safety continues to be the priority for the Mayor and City Council. Earlier this year the Council increased the sworn manning levels to 78 with the addition of a second Captain. While the authorized manning levels remain at 78 sworn officers, the current budget provides a full year funding for 70 officers. This funding allows for a historic 10 % vacancy factor due to retirements, transfer and resignations during the year. In addition, the department is attempting to catch up from the past as the City currently has only 64 officers. The 70 officer manning level would allow for the full staffing of patrol and free up more time for those officers on specialized assignments and the detectives to spend even more time on investigations. Staff Report for Fiscal Year 2014/15 Budget Adoption Page 3 of 3 In addition the Police Department is giving up 5 part -time positions and recommending replacing them with three full -time positions. These positions include a dispatcher, a records specialist II and a community service officer. The Chief believes this will substantially reduce staff turnover in these areas and result in a more experienced staff providing support to the officers in the field. The community service officer will continue to coordinate the domestic violence program and will also be re- establishing the community outreach program for the department. This past year the City started replacing some of the police vehicles that were over 100,000 miles and constantly breaking down. It had been several years where no replacement police vehicles were bought. This year the budget allows for two police vehicles to be bought out of the General Fund and several more specialty Police vehicles to be purchased out of Asset Forfeiture Funds. In addition to the police vehicles, funds are also budgeted for a new fueling station, repair of the garage doors and replacement of several other outdated and obsolete pieces of equipment. Because of the previous economic downturn there were many positions eliminated several years ago. The responsibilities of these individuals were picked up by current staff or increased work hours of part-time employees. Now many of these part-time positions are working over 38 hours a week and are really full -time in the number of hours worked. This budget includes reclassifying 14 positions where individuals are currently working full -time and making them full -time employees. This should result in better service over the long term providing for more continuity, less turn -over, more production and better service to the community While there is a definite growth in the economy and some related economic revenue sources it remains at a slow pace. The City needs to take the continued balanced and conservative approach to spending and the managing of these expenditures. Staff will continue to monitor the situation closely and keep the Mayor and City Council appraised of any change that will impact revenues and the budget. In addition, staff will also be bringing to the City Council various revenue options for them to discuss and consider at a later date. The adoption of these four resolutions will allow the City to keep operating and providing the necessary services to the public and the community for the next fiscal year. Attachments: Budget Resolutions (4) A; =01 a, n XI N me] & LAI I I THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY BOARD MEMBERS OF THE CITY • BALDWIN PARK DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the Budget for the Successor Agency of the City of Baldwin Park for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2014 and ending June 30, 2015, is hereby adopted as prepared and submitted by the Interim Executive Director of the Successor Agency and as modified by the Agency Board for said fiscal year. A Budget is attached to this resolution for adoption as presented. SECTION 2. That from and after the effective date of the adoption of said Budget, the several amounts stated therein as proposed expenditures, shall be deemed appropriated to the several line items for the respective objects and purposed therein stated. All appropriations with the exception of capital improvement programs, shall lapse at the end of the fiscal year to the extent that they shall not have been expended or lawfully encumbered, pursuant to the provisions of all applicable statutes of the State. SECTION 3. That the authority granted for making expenditures shall be limited to the actual amount of money received from the sources of funds indicated in the Budget and no liability upon the Authority is assumed or can be imposed in excess of such amounts as may be provided therefore in the Budget. SECTION 4. That amounts appropriated to any account for any object or purpose may be transferred in the following manner: (A) That at any meeting after adoption of the budget, total appropriations may be amended by the Board Members by a majority vote of a quorum of the Authority Board. (B) For transfers of appropriations within the same cost center program, such transfers up to $15,000 may be approved by the Interim Executive Director. For amounts greater than $15,000, Authority Board approval is required. (C)Transfers up to $15,000 between line items may be approved by the Interim Executive Director. For amounts greater than $15,000, Agency Board approval is required. (D)AII transfers of appropriations in accordance with subsections (B) and (C) above shall be within the same fund. (E) Any transfer of appropriations from one fund to another fund is considered a new appropriation requiring a budget amendment, and such appropriations must be approved by the Agency Board by a majority vote of a quorum of the Agency Board. [Type text] Resolution No. SA 2014-003 Page 2 (F) All transfers made pursuant to the above provisions shall be submitted to the Agency Board for informational purposes. SECTION 5. That the Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of July 2014. MANUELLOZANO CHAIR ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS A N (3 E L E S ss. % Ip 7, 1, ALEJANDRA AVILA, Secretary of the Successor Agency of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly approved and adopted by the Members of the Successor Agency of the City of Baldwin Park at a regular meeting of the Successor Agency on July 2, 2014, by the following vote: AYES: MEMBERS: NOES: MEMBERS: a a - 11, ■ A A > L \ HUB � \ . : >\ <Z ¥ » �*. s� ro c w O %d 0 0 0 0 � C4 U � on O o O N UC✓ C� �Q N p Q n — O a C O � O \O O d N O w kr O M h U O M CT O ¢+ � w o0 00 Ln N O � H O O O O �L U O O ® OL G � a O �i CCS O yU,, � � • • � c O ' � � � � N U � � O O O O CL y U O y ct t®i ?,^ N •p= a _� FrW � p�ay// r U e� N �r9 a� c Nt �n W Vl U m N O C cl U O w O ..r s� ro c w O %d 0 0 0 0 0 o O o O N 00 N Q n — O O N cn \O O d N O O kr O M h N [� M CT O� CT M O O O O O O O O N 00 N O n — O O N cn \O O d N O O kr O M h N [� M CT O� CT M 00 o0 00 Ln �C M a O OCO p 0 00 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O 00 O O h V� 00 M cn h h V .-a — a\ O d It d' M 4n O O O O O O O O N 00 N O n — 0 O N cn \O O d N 0 O kr O M h N [� M CT O� CT M DD o0 00 Ln �C M a O O O O O O O O U O OA O yU,, � � • • � c O ' � � � � N o Ir N O Vn rr- O O O N 00 N O n — O O N cn \O O d N 06 O kr O M h •-^ [� M CT O� CT M N o0 00 Ln �C M a O O 00 O `n O O O O N 00 N O n — O O N cn \O O d N 06 O kr O M h •-^ [� M CT O� CT M N o0 00 Ln �C M a M O O O O O O O O 0 N 0 0 O O O cn O O O N O O O ON O N O M N O d- Ln �C M �C 1n M O O O O O O O O 0 N 0 0 0 cn 0 O O O O N h - Ln M O 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N O cn to O O O O N h - Ln M M 00 00 O M M O O N N O h N � M N O m 1 O O N IM �n h rl r$' M N N M N h I d• N t` O O O O I~ N N Ln Ln h h I I h 0O °o 0 0 0 0 �D h �r 0 0 0 0 h 0o O O O O O O N 0 0 O 0 M h N 00 N a r 75 U cs a C,3 a, ov o O o o p o w Q o o S W <C `� th U Q 0 3 o U o a� a �UL v� �c�a.�UQv�m o.a rA al U O � •-+ N M �O v) � � .-� N M c}' v1 U O O O O O O O N 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ® 00 I~ 03 U U O OA yU,, � � • • � c cd ' ' � � � � � U U � � O O O O CL y U a� a a _� � � A II: 0 P' A A BALDWIN A- Manuel Lozano Ricardo Pacheco Cruz Baca Monica Garcia Susan Rubio - Chair - Vice Chair - Board Member - Board Member - Board Member PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES AND PAGERS WHILE MEETING IS IN PROCESS POR FAVOR DE APAGAR SUS TELEFONOS CEL ULARES Y BEEPERS DURANTE LA JUNTA PUBLIC COMMENTS The public is encouraged to address the Finance Authority on any matter posted on the agenda or on any other matter within its jurisdiction. If you wish to address the Board, you may do so during the PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS period noted on the agenda. Each person is allowed three (3) minutes speaking time. A Spanish speaking interpreter is available for your convenience. COMENTARIOS DEL PUBLICO Se invita at publico a dirigirse a la Agencia nombrada en esta agenda, para hablar sobre cualquier asunto publicado en la agenda o cualquier tema que este bajo su jurisdiccidn. Si usted desea la oportunidad de dirigirse a la Agencia, podra hacerlo durante el periodo de Comentarios del Publico (Public Communications) anunciado en la agenda. A cada persona se le permite hablar por tres (3) minutos. Hay un interprete para su conveniencia. FINANCE AUTHORITY REGULAR MEETING — 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL Board Members: Cruz Baca, Monica Garcia, Susan Rubio, Vice Chair Ricardo Pacheco and Chair Manuel Lozano PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Three (3) minute speaking time limit Tres (3) minutos sera el limite para hablar THIS IS THE TIME SET ASIDE TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION No action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances exist. The legislative body or its staff may: 1) Briefly respond to statements made or questions asked by persons; or 2,) Direct staff to investigate and /or schedule matters for consideration I — . e- at a future meeting. [Government Code §54954.2] ESTE ES EL PERIODO DESIGNADO PARA DIRIGIRSE AL comlsl6N No se podra tomar acci6n en algOn asunto a menos que sea incluido en la agenda, o a menos que exista algOna emergencia o circunstancia especial. El cuerpo legislativo y su personal podran: 1) Responder brevemente a declaraci6nes o preguntas hechas por personas; o 2) Dirigir personal a investigar y1d fijar asuntos para tomar en consideraci6n en juntas proximas. [Codigo de Gobierno §54954.2] SET MATTERS - PUBLIC HEARINGS (7:00 RM, or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard). If in the future you wish to challenge the following in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the C"ity 'r"Ier1K and/or "ity "ouncil at or prior to the public hearing. 1. APPROVAL OF ADOPTION OF THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014/2015 FOR THE CITY, FINANCING AUTHORITY, HOUSING AUTHORITY AND SUCCESSOR AGENCY That the Mayor and City Council approve the City, respective Agency and Authority Budgets for Fiscal Year, 2014/15 by adopting City Resolution 2014-025, Financing Authority Resolution No. 2014-002, Housing Authority Resolution No. 2014-003 and Successor Agency Resolution No. 2014-003. ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATION I, Alejandra Avila, Secretary of the Finance Authority hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing agenda was posted on the City Nall bulletin board not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting. Dated this 26th day of June 2014. Alejandra Avila Secretary PLEASE NOTE: Copies of staff reports and supporting documentation pertaining to each item on this agenda are available for public viewing and inspection at City Hall, 2nd Floor Lobby Area or at the Los Angeles County Public Library in the City of Baldwin Park. For further information regarding agenda items, please contact the office of the City Clerk at (626) 813 -5204 or via e -mail at rcabaflerbaldwiark. oom. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the Public Works Department or Risk Management at (626) 960 -4011. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable staff to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. (28 CFR 34.102.104 ADA TITLE ll) STAFF REPORT SAN-GABRIEL Ao VALLEY ��10 O I TO: The Honorably FROM: Michael Tayvlo Im" r and Members of the City Council Executive Team banal The Mayor and City Council are required to adopt a budget annually for each fiscal year for the City. In addition, they must also adopt budgets for the Successor Agency, the Housing Authority and the Financing Authority where they also sit as Board Members. Attached are copies of the proposed budgets for Fiscal Year 2014/15 and the Resolutions adopting them. FISCAL IMPACT TOTAL BUDGET General Fund $25,023,769 Other Funds Internal Service Funds $ 4,531,691 Special Revenue Funds $ 26,927,291 Financing Authority $ 3,298,920 Housing Authority $ 5,362,411 Successor Agency $ 15,025,133 That the Mayor and City Council approve the City, respective Agency and Authority Budgets for Fiscal Year 2014/15 by adopting City Resolution No. 2014-025, Financing Authority Resolution No. 2014-002, Housing Authority Resolution No. 2014-003 and Successor Agency Resolution No. 2014-003 Staff Report for Fiscal Year 2014/15 Budget Adoption Page 2 of 3 None Required 1:7-mant" The Mayor and City Council must adopt a budget each fiscal year for the City and its respective Agency and Authorities to operate. The Acting Executive Manager and Director of Finance met initially with each member of the Executive Team to review their departmental budgets and their various requests. From those meetings a proposed budget was assembled for the Mayor and City Council to review and consider. The Mayor and Members of the City Council held initial study sessions on June I Oth and 11th. A third session was held on June 20'. During these sessions, staff was asked various questions and was asked to provide additional information and alternatives. At the meeting of June 24th, the Mayor and City Council gave staff final directions on the changes they wanted to the original proposed budget. Those changes have been incorporated into the attached documents. The theme for the next budget year is "Replace, Restore, and Revive". The objectives of this budget are to replace key outdated equipment and vehicles, restore several levels and revive the spirit of the staff and community. The proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2014/15 is $80,169,215. The City's General Fund budget is proposed to be $25,023,769. This is an increase of $581,928 or 2.4% over last year's budget. It provides for no layoffs and some increases in service levels. The -proposed budget has a projected surplus of $153,501 and a projected ending General Fund Balance of $6.376 million. The proposed budget restores two positions in Community Development that had to be eliminated several years ago due to the economic downturn and the elimination of the Redevelopment Agency. The Associate Planner will allow for a quicker turn around in plans and in answering questions about development. The Economic Project Coordinator will allow the City to once again be proactive in economic development. In addition, two part-time positions are also proposed in Planning and in Building to allow for greater efficiency and better service to the public at the counter. Public Safety continues to be the priority for the Mayor and City Council. Earlier this year the Council increased the sworn manning levels to 78 with the addition of a second Captain. While the authorized manning levels remain at 78 sworn officers, the current budget provides a full year funding for 70 officers. This funding allows for a historic 10 % vacancy factor due to retirements, transfer and resignations during the year. In addition, the department is attempting to catch up from the past as the City currently has only 64 officers. The 70 officer manning level would allow for the full staffing of patrol and free up more time for those officers on specialized assignments and the detectives to spend even more time on investigations. Staff Report for Fiscal Year 2014/15 Budget Adoption Page 3 of 3 In addition the Police Department is giving up 5 part-time positions and recommending replacing them with three full-time positions. These positions include a dispatcher, a records specialist 11 and a community service officer. The Chief believes this will substantially reduce staff turnover in these areas and result in a more experienced staff providing support to the officers in the field. The community service officer will continue to coordinate the domestic violence program and will also be re-establishing the community outreach program for the department. This past year the City started replacing some of the police vehicles that were over 100,000 miles and constantly breaking down. it had been several years where no replacement police vehicles were bought. This year the budget allows for two police vehicles to be bought out of the General Fund and several more specialty Police vehicles to be purchased out of Asset Forfeiture Funds. In addition to the police vehicles, funds are also budgeted for a new fueling station, repair of the garage doors and replacement of several other outdated and obsolete pieces of equipment. Because of the previous economic downturn there were many positions eliminated several years ago. The responsibilities of these individuals were picked up by current staff or increased work hours of part-time employees. Now many of these part-time positions are working over 3 8 hours a week and are really full-time in the number of hours worked. This budget includes reclassifying 14 positions where individuals are currently working full-time and making them full-time employees. This should result in better service over the long term providing for more continuity, less turn-over, more production and better service to the community While there is a definite growth in the economy and some related economic revenue sources it remains at a slow pace. The City needs to take the continued balanced and conservative approach to spending and the managing of these expenditures. Staff will continue to monitor the situation closely and keep the Mayor and City Council appraised of any change that will impact revenues and the budget. In addition, staff will also be bringing to the City Council various revenue options for them to discuss and consider at a later date. The adoption of these four resolutions will allow the City to keep operating and providing the necessary services to the public and the community for the next fiscal year. Attachments: Budget Resolutions (4) R&MI RK01 ON Ina I ON NO 041611 ilk I)CWTAXIA 1 0101010101 Lei INA 0 "M "TV kJ &Aar, A990 kq THE FINANCING AUTHORITY BOARD MEMBERS OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the Budget for the Financing Authority of the City of Baldwin Park for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2014 and ending June 30, 2015, is hereby adopted as prepared and submitted by the Interim Executive Director of the Financing Authority and as modified by the Authority Board for said fiscal year. A Budget is attached to this resolution for adoption as presented. SECTION 2. That from and after the effective date of the adoption of said Budget, the several amounts stated therein as proposed expenditures, shall be deemed appropriated to the several line items for the respective objects and purposed therein stated. All appropriations with the exception of capital improvement programs, shall lapse at the end of the fiscal year to the extent that they shall not have been expended or lawfully encumbered, pursuant to the provisions of all applicable statutes of the State. SECTION 3. That the authority granted for making expenditures shall be limited to the actual amount of money received from the sources of funds indicated in the Budget and no liability upon the Authority is assumed or can be imposed in excess of such amounts as may be provided therefore in the Budget. SECTION 4. That amounts appropriated to any account for any object or purpose may be transferred in the following manner: (A) That at any meeting after adoption of the budget, total appropriations may be amended by the Board Members by a majority vote of a quorum of the Authority Board. (B) For transfers of appropriations within the same cost center program, such transfers up to $15,000 may be approved by the Interim Executive Director. For amounts greater than $15,000, Authority Board approval is required. (C)Transfers up to $15,000 between line items may be approved by the Interim Executive Director. For amounts greater than $15,000, Authority Board approval is required. (D)AII transfers of appropriations in accordance with subsections (B) and (C) above shall be within the same fund. (E) Any transfer of appropriations from one fund to another fund is considered a new appropriation requiring a budget amendment, and such appropriations must be approved by the Authority Board by a majority vote of a quorum of the Authority Board. [Type text] Resolution No. FA 2014-002 Page 2 (F) All transfers made pursuant to the above provisions shall be submitted to the Authority Board for informational purposes. SECTION 5. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. iil I I Jill 11111111 UAW IFIMM STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ss. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK I ' ' A ' I E-1 ' A ' NDRA AVILA, City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly approved and adopted by the Members of the Financing Authority of the City of Baldwin Park at a regular meeting of the Financing Authority on July 2, 2014, by the following vote: FAMME NOES: MEMBERS: 111, 0 • ALEJANDRA AVILA CITY CLERK \< k ©2� . rAW U � U � N a � O Wqt, O O O O W O w O N M N O � H 00 L. O r CA It ® Cr � G �E W bQ U U O � v-a W 4COr O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 V) O\ 3 O 110 cd ® N ~ iy 'z' ct U CC N b U C7 O O N 0v0 O R3 U .er O O O O— O N M \Q 00 C* r CA It bQ v-a O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 V) O\ 110 cd C� c .0 Q ct o b U C7 O O N 0v0 O ct .-i O O O O O O O O d 000 O O °-+ N M M M MLn g� O � O O O O O N M �D 0 0 0 O N O It O ri It L [� Ln Ln dam" V- owl O bQ cd C� c .0 Q ct o O Ln p. ct O °-+ N M M M MLn g� ALI I : A I I a A 0 1911 ilk telvil I I I :Ike] ON1 JULY 27 2014 7:00 PM A A BALDWIN11 Manuel Lozano - Chair Ricardo Pacheco - Vice Chair Cruz Baca - Board Member Monica Garcia - Board Member Susan Rubio - Board Member PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES AND PAGERS WHILE MEETING IS IN PROCESS POR FA VOR DE APAGAR SUS TELEFONOS CELULARES Y BEEPERS DURANTE LA JUNTA PUBLIC COMMENTS The public is encouraged to address the Housing Authority on any matter posted on the agenda or on any other matter within its jurisdiction. If you wish to address the Board, you may do so during the PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS period noted on the agenda. Each person is allowed three (3) minutes speaking time, A Spanish speaking interpreter is available for your convenience. COMENTARIOS DEL PUBLICO Se invita al p0blico a dirigirse a la Agencia nombrada en esta agenda, para hablar sobre cualquier asunto publicado en la agenda o cualquier tema que est6 bajo su jurisdicci6n. Si usted desea la oportunidad de dirigirse a la Agencia, podr6 hacerlo durante e/ perfodo de Comentarios del Pdblico (Public Communications) anunciado en la agenda. A cada persona se /e permite hablar por tres (3) minutos. Hay un int6rprete para su conveniencia. HOUSING AUTHORITY REGULAR MEETING — 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL Board Members: Cruz Baca, Monica Garcia, Susan Rubio, Vice Chair Ricardo Pacheco and Chair Manuel Lozano PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Three (3) minute speaking time limit Tres (3) minutos sera el limite para hablar THIS IS THE TIME SET ASIDE TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION No action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances exist. The legislative body or its staff may: 1) Br iefly r espond to statements made or questions asked by persons; or 2) Direct staff to investigate and /or schedule matters for consideration at a future meeting. (Government Code §54954.21 ESTE ES EL PERIODO DESIGNADO PARA DIRIGIRSE AL COMISI6N No se podra tomar acci6n en algun asunto a menos que sea incluido en la agenda, o a menos que exista alguna emergencia o circunstancia especial. El cuerpo legislativo y su personal podran: 1) Responder brevemente a declaraci6nes o preguntas hechas par personas, o 2) Dirigir personal a investigar yio fijar asuntos para tomar en consideraci6n en juntas proximas. [Codigo de Gobierno §54954.2] SET MATTERS - PUBLIC HEARINGS (7:00 P.M, or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard). If in the future you wish to challenge the following in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk and /or City Council at or prior to the public hearing. 1. APPROVAL OF ADOPTION OF THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014/2015 FOR THE CITY, FINANCING AUTHORITY, HOUSING AUTHORITY AND SUCCESSOR AGENCY That the Mayor and City Council approve the City, respective Agency and Authority Budgets for Fiscal Year 2014/15 by adopting City Resolution 2014 -025, Financing Authority Resolution No. 2014 -002, Housing Authority Resolution No. 2014 -003 and Successor Agency Resolution No. 2014 -003. ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATION I, Alejandra Avila, Secretary of the Housing Authority hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing agenda was posted on the City Hall bulletin board not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting. Dated this 26th day of June 2014. Alejandra Avila Secretary PLEASE NOTE. Copies of staff reports and supporting documentation pertaining to each item on this agenda are available for public viewing and inspection at City Hall, 2 "d Floor Lobby Area or at the Los Angeles County Public Library in the City of Baldwin Park. For further information regarding agenda items, please contact the office of the City Clerk at (626) 813 -5204 or via e -mail at corn . In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the Public Works Department or Risk Management at (626) 960 -4011, Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable staff to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. (28 CFR 34,102.104 ADA TITLE 11) U M1 N gal ILEA 1! The Mayor and City Council are required to adopt a budget annually for each fiscal year for the City. In addition, they must also adopt budgets for the Successor Agency, the Housing Authority and the Financing Authority where they also sit as Board Members. Attached are copies of the proposed budgets for Fiscal Year 2014/15 and the Resolutions adopting them. FISCAL IMPACT General Fund $25,023,769 Other Funds Internal Service Funds $ 4,531,691 Special Revenue Funds $ 26,927,291 Financing Authority $ 3,298,920 Housing Authority $ 5,362,411 Successor Agency $ 15,025,133 0 RE611ifflu, 9 That the Mayor and City Council approve the City, respective Agency and Authority Budgets for Fiscal Year 2014/15 by adopting City Resolution No. 2014-025, Financing Authority Resolution No. 2014-002, Housing Authority Resolution No. 2014-003 and Successor Agency Resolution No. 2014-003 Staff Report for Fiscal Year 2014/15 Budget Adoption Page 2 of 3 LEGAL REVIEW None Required The Mayor and City Council must adopt a budget each fiscal year for the City and its respective Agency and Authorities to operate. The Acting Executive Manager and Director of Finance met initially with each member of the Executive Team to review their departmental budgets and their various requests. From those meetings a proposed budget was assembled for the Mayor and City Council to review and consider. The Mayor and Members of the City Council held initial study sessions on June 10th and 11th. A third session was held on June 24th. During these sessions, staff was asked various questions and was asked to provide additional information and alternatives. At the meeting of June 24th, the Mayor and City Council gave staff final directions on the changes they wanted to the original proposed budget. Those changes have been incorporated into the attached documents. The theme for the next budget year is "Replace, Restore, and Revive ". The objectives of this budget are to replace key outdated equipment and vehicles, restore several levels and revive the spirit of the staff and community. The proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2014/15 is $80,169,215. The City's General Fund budget is proposed to be $25,023,769. This is an increase of $581,928 or 2.4% over last year's budget. It provides for no layoffs and some increases in service levels. The proposed budget has a projected surplus of $153,501 and a projected ending General Fund Balance of $6.376 million. The proposed budget restores two positions in Community Development that had to be eliminated several years ago due to the economic downturn and the elimination of the Redevelopment Agency. The Associate Planner will allow for a quicker turn around in plans and in answering questions about development. The Economic Project Coordinator will allow the City to once again be proactive in economic development. In addition, two part -time positions are also proposed in Planning and in Building to allow for greater efficiency and better service to the public at the counter. Public Safety continues to be the priority for the Mayor and City Council. Earlier this year the Council increased the sworn manning levels to 78 with the addition of a second Captain. While the authorized manning levels remain at 78 sworn officers, the current budget provides a full year funding for 70 officers. This funding allows for a historic 10 % vacancy factor due to retirements, transfer and resignations during the year. In addition, the department is attempting to catch up from the past as the City currently has only 64 officers. The 70 officer manning level would allow for the full staffing of patrol and free up more time for those officers on specialized assignments and the detectives to spend even more time on investigations. Staff Report for Fiscal Year 2014/15 Budget Adoption Page 3 of 3 In addition the Police Department is giving up 5 part-time positions and recommending replacing them with three full -time positions. These positions include a dispatcher, a records specialist II and a community service officer. The Chief believes this will substantially reduce staff turnover in these areas and result in a more experienced staff providing support to the officers in the field. The community service officer will continue to coordinate the domestic violence program and will also be re-establishing the community outreach program for the department. This past year the City started replacing some of the police vehicles that were over 100,000 miles and constantly breaking down. It had been several years where no replacement police vehicles were bought. This year the budget allows for two police vehicles to be bought out of the General Fund and several more specialty Police vehicles to be purchased out of Asset Forfeiture Funds. In addition to the police vehicles, funds are also budgeted for a new fueling station, repair of the garage doors and replacement of several other outdated and obsolete pieces of equipment. Because of the previous economic downturn there were many positions eliminated several years ago. The responsibilities of these individuals were picked up by current staff or increased work hours of part-time employees. Now many of these part-time positions are working over 38 hours a week and are really full -time in the number of hours worked. This budget includes reclassifying 14 positions where individuals are currently working full -time and making them full -time employees. This should result in better service over the long term providing for more continuity, less turn -over, more production and better service to the community While there is a definite growth in the economy and some related economic revenue sources it remains at a slow pace. The City needs to take the continued balanced and conservative approach to spending and the managing of these expenditures. Staff will continue to monitor the situation closely and keep the Mayor and City Council appraised of any change that will impact revenues and the budget. In addition, staff will also be bringing to the City Council various revenue options for them to discuss and consider at a later date. The adoption of these four resolutions will allow the City to keep operating and providing the necessary services to the public and the community for the next fiscal year. Attachments: Budget Resolutions (4) A RESOLUTION OF THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ADOPTING THE BUDGET OF THE AUTHORITY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 2014 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 2015 THE HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD MEMBERS OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the Budget for the Housing Authority of the City of Baldwin Park for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2014 and ending June 30, 2015, is hereby adopted as prepared and submitted by the Executive Director of the Housing Authority and as modified by the Authority Board for said fiscal year. A Budget is attached to this resolution for adoption as presented. SECTION 2. That from and after the effective date of the adoption of said Budget, the several amounts stated therein as proposed expenditures, shall be deemed appropriated to the several line items for the respective objects and purposed therein stated. All appropriations with the exception of capital improvement programs, shall lapse at the end of the fiscal year to the extent that they shall not have been expended or lawfully encumbered, pursuant to the provisions of all applicable statutes of the State. SECTION 3. That the authority granted for making expenditures shall be limited to the actual amount of money received from the sources of funds indicated in the Budget and no liability upon the Authority is assumed or can be imposed in excess of such amounts as may be provided therefore in the Budget. SECTION 4. That amounts appropriated to any account for any object or purpose may be transferred in the following manner: (A) That at any meeting after adoption of the budget, total appropriations may be amended by the Board Members by a majority vote of a quorum of the Authority Board. (B) For transfers of appropriations within the same cost center program, such transfers up to $15,000 may be approved by the Interim Executive Director. For amounts greater than $15,000, Authority Board approval is required. (C)Transfers up to $15,000 between line items may be approved by the Interim Executive Director. For amounts greater than $15,000, Authority Board approval is required. (D)AII transfers of appropriations in accordance with subsections (B) and (C) above shall be within the same fund. (E) Any transfer of appropriations from one fund to another fund is considered a new appropriation requiring a budget amendment, and such appropriations must be approved by the Authority Board by a majority vote of a quorum of the Authority Board. [Type text] Resolution No. HA 2014-001 Page 2 (F) All transfers made pursuant to the above provisions shall be submitted to the Authority Board for informational purposes. SECTION 5. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. "Ma"s .06IM"I THIrep-7 "MM10W1921112111 MANUELLOZAN# CHAIR ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ss. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK I 1, ALEJANDRA AVILA, City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly approved and adopted by the Members of the Housing Authority of the City of Baldwin Park at a regular meeting of the Housing Authority on July 2, 2014, by the following vote: NOES.- MEMBERS: ABSENT: MEMBERS: a - 111 0 • ALEJANDRA AVILA CITY CLERK 0 e a • on CC U R R, L". t Cl �-i O •� vl 'CS � kn U r N �O Cd U � � O w O1 N O N •-+ � N M N 't N a M M M � N O cc 01 R � 't N M i M M O O O O d- N N M M - - V) M CT O M d' R V � O �+ U U O U � � O O � O oll 01 0\