Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2015 11 18
NOTICE AND CALL OF A SPECIAL ETI G OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO THE MEMBERS OF THE AFOREMENTIONED AGENCIES AND THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Special Meeting is hereby called to be held on WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2015 at 6:00 PM'. at City Hall — 3rd Floor Conference Room 307, 14403 East Pacific Avenue, Baldwin Park, CA 91706. Said Special Meeting shall be for the purpose of conducting business in accordance with the attached Agenda. NO OTHER BUSINESS WILL BE DISCUSSED Dated: November 12, 2015 r Manuel Lozano Mayor AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, Alejandra Avila, City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, certify that I caused the aforementioned Notice and Call of a Special Meeting to be delivered via email (hard copy to follow) to each Member and a-ra it to the Sari Gabriel Valley Tdbune„ and that I posted said notice as required by law on November 12, 2015. Alejandra Avila City Clerk AGENDA BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL LPlease note SPECIAL MEETING time and meeting location NOVEMBER 18,2015 6:00 PM CITY HALL — 3"d Floor, Conference Room 307 14403 EAST PACIFIC AVENUE BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 (626) 960-4011 'OjV-7 TT -1 H U 110F 7" TMIE,; SAN,�GARRJEL �o VAL'I-EY Manuel Lozano Cruz Baca Monica Garcia Ricardo Pacheco Susan Rubio - Mayor - Mayor Pro Tern - Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES AND PAGERS WHILE MEETING IS IN PROCESS POR FAVOR DEAPAGAR SUS TELEFONOS CELULARES Y BEEPERS DURANTELA JUNTA -PUBLIC COMMENTS The public is encouraged to address the City Council or any of its Agencies listed on this agenda on any matter, posted on the agenda or on any other inattor withio its jurisdiction, if You wish, to address the City C01111cil orally Of its Agencies, you may do so during the PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS period noted on the agenda. Each person is allowed three (3) minutes speaking time. A Spanish-speaking iratertrreter is available ro r ytcqqv�iniencq COMENTARIOS DEL PUBLICO Se invita a/ pOblico a dirigirse a/ Concilio o cualquiera otra de sus Agencias nombradas en esta agenda, para hablar sobre- cualquier osunto pubficado en /a agenda o cualquier tema que estel bajo su jurisdicci6n. Si usted desea la opodunidad de dirigilse Ell COOCNO 0 a1guna de sus Agencias, podr6i hacerlo durante e/ periodo de Comentarios del Pdblico (Public Communications) anunciado en la agenda. A cada persona se /e permite ha blar por tres (3) min utos. Hay _yq_�p��rp su convent end a,— CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING – 6:00 P.M. CALL, TO ORDER ROLL CALL: Council Members: Monica Garcia, Ricardo Pacheco, Susan Rubio, Mayor Pro Tern Cruz Baca and Mayor Manuel Lozano PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Three (3) minute speaking time limit Tres (3) minutes sera e/ limite para hablar THIS IS THE TIME SET ASIDE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL PLEASE NOTIFY THE CITY CLERK IF YOU REQUIRE THE SERVICES OF AN INTERPRETER No action nuay be 4 -Bert on a rnatter urfless, it is hs4ed oii the ut;cnda, or wfless c;ertain eniergericy orspecial eircumstalices exist. The regishitive body or st4if1'rnay: 1) Briefly res)ond to statements tna& or qL1CSikMS asked by jwrsons; or 2) Direct stalfl") i1westigate and/or schedule i-rKitters for tA,)risiderafloo ata kaure ivweting. It: ovcmmvit Code §5495421 ESTE ES EL PERIODO DESIGNADO PARA DIRIGIRSE AL CONCILIO FAVOR DE NOTIFICAR A LA SECRETARIA S1 REQUIERE LOS SERVICIOS DEL INTERPRETE No so podra totriar,,=Ori ona1gt,)jj 1,1sunto a menos que sea incluido cm In agenda, o a roonos quo exista alg0na emerguncia () circunstancia especial, El cuorpo leghslalivo y sit personal jwdrarr 1) Responders brevemento a declaracidnes o preguntas heChas por personas; o 2) DWg(r persa)j)j.jj f,,a investig,irylb fijar asuntas para tornar on corisi(,Iei,aci6r)ei,iji,ititaspf'oxiinas, [(,otlicyo(le,Gobioitio§54954,2) 1. CENTER MEDIAN LANDSCAPE DESIGN Presentation of center median landscape design for discussion and selection. 2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—EXISTING LITIGATION Pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9: Case Name: Collaso v. City of Baldwin Park, Case Numbers: 12-112708 and 13-117235 3. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957,6: Aqc-ric.y_gesjcllateq_Lqa[gagn!g!iyp_s: Shannon YaLJchzee and Robert Tafoya QnrqL�rese!jtq_d Ej:pplir ep(§)_.; Chief Executive Officer; Cominkinity Development Director; Human Resource Manager; Police Chief; Public Works Durector; Recreation and Community Services Director 4. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT (GC §54957): Title: Finance Director 5. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9: Potential Case(s): Two (2) RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATION I, Alejandra Avila, City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park hereby that, certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, the foregoing agenda was posted on the City Hall bulletin board not less than 24 hours prior to the meeting on November 12, 2015, Alejandra Avila City Clerk PLEASE N07E. Copies of staff repaorls anal SuPportrng documentation pertaining to each item on Ihis agcnrc°a are available for public viewing and inspection at City Hall, 2"d Floor Lobby Area or at the Los Angeles Corrrrly Public Libi'my in the City of Baldwm Park. For further intorn inion regarding agenda items, please corrlact the office of tho City Clerk at (626) 960-4011 ext. 466 ore -marl krltpelfdbatdwiigpI,rk cram. In compliance with the Arnericans with Disabilities Act, if' you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the Pubfic Works Department or Risk Management at (626) 960-4011. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable staff to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. (28 CFR 34.102.104 ADA TITLE 11) AGENDA BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 18, 2015 7:00 PM COUNCIL CHAMBER 14403 E. Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, CA 91706 (626) 960-4011 yp,L 1AURO T'A LHE AI C131NEfl.. EY VAL LEY ''1FD JANo Manuel Lozano - Mayor Cruz Baca - Mayor Pro Tem Monica Garcia - Council Member Ricardo Pacheco - Council Member Susan Rubio - Council Member PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES AND PAGERS WHILE MEETING IS IN PROCESS POR FAVOR DE APAGAR SUS TELEFONOS CELULARES Y BEEPERS DURANTE LA JUNTA PUBLIC COMMENTS The public is encouraged to address the City Council or any of its Agencies listed on this agenda on any matter posted on the agenda or on any other matter within its jurisdiction. If you wish to address the City Council or any of its Agencies, you may do so during the PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS period noted on the agenda Each person is allowed three (3) minutes speakil7g tante. A Spanish speaking interpreter is available for your convenience. COMENTARIOS DEL PUBLICO Se invita al publico a dirigirse al Concilio o cualquiera otra de sus Agencias nombradas on esta agenda, para hablar sobre cualquier asunto publicado en la agenda o cualquier tema que est6 bajo su jurisdicci6n. Si usted desea la oportunidad de dirigirse al Concilio o alguna de sus Agencias, podr6 hacerlo durance el perlodo de Comentarios del Publico (Public Communications) anunciado en la agenda. A cada persona se le permite hablar por tres (3) minutos. Hay un int6rprete para su conveniencia. A1J"C, ho 71 ! of01)l„"r` �a1 f;il�i H);/ );/ 1'O (lir, i if}r CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING — 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL Council Members: Monica Garcia, Ricardo Pacheco, Susan Rubio, Mayor Pro Tem Cruz Baca and Mayor Manuel Lozano REPORT 1=ROM CLOSED SESSION ANNOUNCEMENTS This is to announce, as required by Government Code section 54952.3, members of the City Council are also members of the Board of Directors of the Housing Authority and Finance Authority, which are concurrently convening with the City Council this evening and each Council Member is paid an additional stipend of $30 for attending the Housing Authority meeting and $50 for attending the Finance Authority meeting. PROCLAONS • Presentation by Kenn Fujioka and Paul Novak, for the San Gabriel Valley Vector Control District • Presentation by Steven Sheridan, Los Angeles County Public Works, on the Anticipated Effect of EI Nino • Presentation by Lou Ortega, Pharmacy Director, and Reyna Del Haro, Public Affairs Director, of Kaiser Permanente on National Drug Take Back Day PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Three (3) minute speaking time limit Tres (3) minutos sera el limite para hablar THIS IS THE TIME SET ASIDE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL PLEASE NOTIFY THE CITY CLERK IF YOU REQUIRE THE SERVICES OF AN INTERPRETER No action omy be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the agenda, or unless certain emergwicy or special circumstances exist, Tne legisiative body or its stub` may: ) Briony rospond to statements made or questions asked by persons, or, 2,) Direct staff to investigate dndlor schedule matters tar, consideration at a future meeting. [Government Code §54954.2] ESTE ES EL PERIODO DESIGNADO PARA DIRIGIRSE AL CONCILIO FAVOR DE NOTIFICAR A LA SECRETARIA SI REQUIERE LOS SERVICIOS DEL INTERPRETE No se podr,a tome aac.°cidn on aigcrn asunto a menos que sea i ac:luido era to agonda, o as rnenos quo exista a1g0nar errr,r i lencrea o circunstaancia especial Fl cuotpo legi'sltiativo y su personal podrarr: `9'� Responder brevemente a declarucianes o pregurrtaas t,ecrlaas por personas; o j Dirrcyh- personal a investigar y/o friar asuntos para tornrar erg considerGaci6a on jufd as proxinraas, [Codigo de Gobierno §54954.2] City Council Agenda Page 2 CONSENT CALENDAR All i&ems lusted are considered to be routine business by the City Council and will be approved with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a City Councilmember so requests, in which case, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. 1. WARRANTS AND DEMANDS Staff recommends that Council ratify the attached Warrants and Demands Register. 2. TREASURER'S REPORT — SEPTEMBER 2015 Staff recommends that Council receive and file the Treasurer's Report for the month of September 2015. 3. REJECTION OF CLAIMS Staff recommends that Council reject the following claims and direct staff to send the appropriate notice of rejection to claimants: Karla Solis Pena Claimant alleges being rear-ended by City employee Caren Vargas -Soto Claimant alleges impound of vehicle Edgar Olvera Claimant alleges being rear-ended by City employee 4. MEETING MINUTES Staff recommends that Council receive and file the following Meeting Minutes: A. Meeting Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings held on March 7, 2012. B. Meeting Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings held on March 21, 2012. C. Meeting Minutes of the Special Joint Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council and Baldwin Park Planning Commission held on March 28, 2012. D. Meeting Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings held on November 4, 2015 5. APPROVE THE 9-1-1 COMMUNICATIONS UPGRADE Staff recommends that Council approve: a) Waiving the formal bidding process for the 9-1-1 system upgrade, per Baldwin Park Municipal Codes §34.37 and §34.23(c); and b) Authorizing the Finance Director to complete a budget amendment for an amount not to exceed $15,223.52 from Account 206-30-320-58110-00000-2 and designate $15,223.552 for restricted purchase of the 9-1-1 system upgrades ($125,819.58 to be reimbursed by the State); and c) Authorizing the Chief of Police, or his designee, to complete all appropriate documentation to complete the modernization. City Council Agenda Page 3 6. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR THE 2016 GREATER LOS ANGELES HOMELESS COUNT OPT -IN PROGRAM Staff recommends that Council approve and authorize the Mayor to enter into an MOU with the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority. 7.. APPROVE A RESOLUTION EXERCISING THE OPTION TO WITHDRAW FROM THE LOS ANGELES REGIONAL INTEROPERABLE COMMUNICATION (LA- RICS) JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY (JPA) Staff recommends that Council: A. Read by title only, and waive further reading, and adopt the Resolution No. 2015- 100, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK EXERCISING ITS OPTION TO WITHDRAW FROM THE LOS ANGELES REGIONAL INTEROPERABLE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM (LA- RICS) JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY (JPA);" B. Direct the Chief Executive Officer, or his designee, to issue a notice of such option to the LA -RIGS Board prior to the November 24, 2015, the Opt -Out expiration date; and C. Direct the Chief of Police to explore other options concerning Radio (LMR) and Data (LTE) services and capabilities. PUBLIC HEARING 8. A REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND A SPECIFIC PLAN INCLUDING AN URBAN DESIGN FRAMEWORK, CIRCULATION AND PARKING, ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, AND DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES WITHIN THE AREA GENERALLY DEFINED AS THE CITY'S DOWNTOWN AREA. (LOCATION: THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT AREA, GENERALLY BOUNDED BY LA RICA AVENUE TO THE WEST, CLARK STREET TO THE NORTH, PARK N RIDE LOT TO THE EAST AND DOWNING AVENUE TO THE SOUTH, INCLUDING THE METROLINK RAIL STATION; APPLICANT: CITY OF BALDWIN PARK; CASE NUMBER: SP 15-01). Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that, following the public hearing, the City Council approve and adopt: A, Resolution 2015-098 entitled "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park Adopting the Findings of Fact and Approving a Transit -Oriented Development Specific Plan for the Downtown Baldwin Park Area (Location: the Central Business District Area Generally Bounded by La Rica Avenue to the west, Clark Street to the north, Park -N -Ride Lot to the east and Downing Avenue to the south, including the Metrolink Rail Station. Applicant: City of Baldwin Park; Case Number: Specific Plan 15-01 (SP 15-01); and B. Resolution 2015-099 entitled "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park Certifying the Environmental Impact Report for the Proposed Downtown Transit -Oriented Specific Plan as Adequate and Complete and Adopting a Statement of Findings of Fact in Support Thereof, a Statement of City Council Agenda Page 4 Overriding Considerations and Mitigation Monitoring Program (Location: the Central Business District Area Generally Bounded by La Rica Avenue to the west, Clark Street to the north, Park -N -Ride Lot to the east and Downing Avenue to the south, including the Metrolink Rail Station. Applicant: City Of Baldwin Park; Case Number: Specific Plan 15-01 (SP 15-01). 9. REVIEW OF CURRENT APPLICATIONS AND CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENT OF STUDENT MEMBERS OF RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION Staff recommends that Council review the subn application(s), accept nomination(s), appoint the selec and Community Services Commission and, followi Resolution No. 2015-090, entitled, "A Resolution of th Baldwin Park Appointing Qualified Students From Thre To The Recreation & Community Services Commission To Office Numbers 6, 7 And 8." itted Student Commission ;d individual(s) to the Parks g the appointment, adopt City Council of the City of Baldwin Park High Schools Of The City Of Baldwin Park CITY COUNCIL / CITY CLERK / CITY TREASURER / STAFF REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATION I, Alejandra Avila, City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park hereby certify that, under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, the foregoing agenda was posted on the City Hall bulletin board not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting. Dated this 12th day of November, 2015. Alejandra Avila City Clerk PLEASE NOTECopies of staff report's and supporling documentation pertaining to each item on this agenda are availabie for public viewing and inspection at City Pall„ 2nd Floor Lobby Area or at the Bros Angeles County Pubhc Library in file City of Baldwin Park. For further information regarding agenda items, please contact the office of the City Clerk at (626) 960.4011 ext. 466 or via e-mail at kr�assell-�"t4a!LINim2ark,con'i,. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the Public Works Department or Risk Management at (626) 960-4011. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable staff to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. (28 CFR 34.102.104 ADA TITLE II) City Council Agenda Page 5 ITEM NO. STAFF REPORT v%�ar,,,�„/,tio,�r✓,�i„ii,�.�i�G„ol����� �fui,�4' �',�� rair, r����� +! TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers U 6 OF FROM: Rose Tam, Accounting Manager ao�r� 1 DATE: November 18, 2015 lAB Ey” o �-' SUBJECT: WARRANTS AND DEMANDS. N'A"�'{b SUMMARY Attached is the Warrants and Demands Register for the City of Baldwin Park to be ratified by the City Council. FISCAL IMPACT The payroll for the last period was $391,449.11 and the attached General Warrants Register were $630,334.15 for a total amount of $1,021,783.26. LEGAL REVIEW None required. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council ratify the attached Warrants and Demands Register. BACKGROUND The attached Claims and Demands report format meets the required information as set out in the California Government Code. Staff has reviewed the requests for expenditures for the appropriate budgetary approval and for the authorization from the department head or its designee. Pursuant to Section 37208 of the California Government Code, the Chief Executive Officer or his/her designee hoes hereby certify to the accuracy of the demands hereinafter referred. Payments released since the previous City Council meeting and the following is a summary of the payment released: The payroll of the City of Baldwin Park consisting of check numbers 197520 to 197562. Additionally, Automated Clearing House (ACH) Payroll deposits were made on behalf of City Employees from control number 244954 to 245201 for the period of October 11, 2015 through October 24, 2015, inclusive; these are presented and hereby ratified in the amount of $391,449.11. 2. General Warrants, including check numbers 207378 to 207544, in the total amount of $630;334.15 constituting of claims and demands against the City of Baldwin Park, are herewith presented to the City Council as required by law, and the same hereby ratified. clq R C7 C.7 z �4 z CJ �4 z z z PR Ci Fa I H H H H H H H H H H-1 H H H-9 H H Ix E-0 u ul E, Ei E-i rf) U) U) In w (n ca ca (n ul U) (n U) V) rf) FI F.-i P Fr p p El F+ H F.-i P H E- P &4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H Ln Ln Ln -A H C) i C3 CD 0 cq Ln CD H N 1-4 cq Lr) Ln cq Ln co to LC) Ln '2Y) co Co00 cq P,,o 00 cq 41 co w U 00 H H 0 1 1-1 'A \m z N > � > > 0 1-1 140 P, 0 ri 0 0 1-1 0 r (D Lr) a ri Hz N z H z H z CN CCOD 11 Q 0 CD u 0 CD > 0 P� Ln H ry W r-,> 0 0 ca-- H Ua CN U) Ct) y1 C7 E1 C.7 z P p CN 0 E+ C7 CnW ul rf) u D� 0) C) 9 z 0 0 w W � (D p1-1 N N H 0 U) pl, 0 m Pa 04 ca �4 �3 z H to ri) P� 10 M H P, P, U, --,W W'" 1p, 0 Q N 0 Q z m O;3 OW fq m z 0 Q 0 P4 Z r14 WX (n9 W w a} 0 q# P4 W M P4 W \PLI aU) 134 1 aa01- 1 u u 0 tit P4 N WW 0 '- W N p H NN 04 pq I C) 0 E-1 P� C:l 0 z ca Q 0 E 2 ' o � . 4WWW 0 W P4 11 0 W P, W 11 04 04 rn 4 H aczN tin ct) Ln P i Www Www Hww U) ww > w aW u 0 H 0 OE H U11 1111 WH H) 11 oEn �D a4 H P4 Z Q Q > Q 04 N N f]4 H H En ,4 x P4 r4 P4 (n P� z 0 0 E- i (D W H H W C� W H n Cq C:) W H H CD DI C�, W H -� W C:, u CD P� C, o 0 t 4 P4 (14 P4 P4 04 04 a, 0 00 H r- U) P4 CD Q 1 'A --i H H H --i H H H H 'A H N IOI I 0 CD CD O 0 CD n CD CD C) O n CD O CD 0 0 CD CD (D 0 C) C) CD CD CD 0 CD o (D CD CD CD C, a (D 0 0 (N CD CD 0 WW 0 CD O C) 0 CD O C) CD CD CD n CD CD CD 0 0 rn C) CD 0 w C) cy 0 00 00 C) CD 00 00 C, 00 C, C, H o0 a 00--I r- --I r- [- ", m m m F., (o 1 .1 m N .1 .1 1 .1 1. .1 4 .1 10, .1 �. .1 I C) . .1 m 0 C) -1 1-4 1-1 0 1-1 1--1 r- li c- 1-1 cli 1-4 1-4 a) _1 I-i C- I-i OHH r- i cp 11 OO 0 C14 N Om (n w C:) do Neo VI Co cq do cq 'IV cq m �o Lr) Cq 001-1 C) cq cq C. m 00 CD N N CD N NC,4 N -I N CD N rl N N C) N I-i N I-i cq cli C, CN Ori (D -° I (D 11 'A (D m 0 [H W>P. N cq cq cq N cli N N N N N N cq CN N N cq Ln N N Lf ' In HID 0. C3 (D b CD C) 0 CD 0 (D CD CD a CD CD CD CD C) n1 1 I 1 0 m Ln Lf) CD Lf) 0 0 LI) m M Lf) CD (D v Ln 181 (o OLO CD 0 Ln CD C) Ln O Lr) (D Ln O0 Ln CD CD Ln C) Ln c� cD CD �, 1 � CD I-i I I 1--i 1-4 -1 1 1 1 1-1 '- (D CD \ C) 0 -1 CD CD \ CD I Ln I.. I 'D rn (In w m m Wmm W M �o m w m rn 'D m m w m �o r) m "o rq r- CD t- m r- C) CD r- r- I 1 1 cl 1 cq I I C', I I C', I I C', I C', 11 cq 11 C', N 11 11 C', 11 C', .1 cq .1 "1 .1 .1 C', u 0 1 -A -, I - I - - � C;� -, -1 C:, I- (D 11 (D CD C) — CD 0 CD CD CD c, c) n C3 C) 0 C:, a C� C) Lr) C3 C) CD (D CD C) 0 CD 0 cD C) CD 0 C� Ln In --I Ln Lo LI) Lf) Lf) Lc) 1-4 'A Ln 1-4 Ln Ln li Ln Ln 'A 1-4 U) U) 1-4 H C) 00 O C) C:) CD C) 0 0 0 C, CD CD n a) 0) CD CD w C�' 'D CD C� 0 00 Co CD 0 CD CD 0 CD CD 0 CD L '� �o '00 Co'3� r- 1-4 C� a L� C= 0 0 C= CD CD CD 0 CD • CD 0 CD (D � Lf) Eq ss 1 HC� (:� CD, 1� L� 0 . r-Im U) a) m OD m 1-1 N m OD rm. - - � C� 0� � W r- co - M CD C� 0 m (1) 00 LIn CD I- 00 m C,- Lft da m �o r r- -A C14 E- Lf) Lf) vi- 1-4 1-1 m w -4 ill- 1-1 1-4 NMM Vl- Ln J). H 'A N Ln Co CD r- Lr) 00 (3) U) NV). Ln �L� 'I V). " Lf) CD C) V)} VI 41) Ln J). if, N 1-1 0W E..,q E..,Ih- 'A 0 ti CK) OS CD LO w co 0) ID C11 r - Co Co Co Co Co co co OJ Co a) m m m m m m m m M m m m m re) m r - r- r.- r-- [-. c- r CD CD C) C. CD CD C) CD O O 0 O O Cr CD cq c"I N CV cq CN N N N (N CV N cq FQ 0 1-4 1-1 0 ulrh C9 C C7 IR, z z G7 Ch C7 z 117 x�Ch C) H H Fl H H H H E� E. &I p El U) ul P U) P ul E1 ul p w E� U) p m p ul p 0) P U) p p 11) 11) P �D �o �o b �D W0 0 (D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co H Ln � In H C) I CD cq C) kD CD HN m r- m m a 0 In to Ln mm m di'T v III Lr)CD CD -f --I LO '1 4 (D 0 'A H C:) (D C) 01 I -i m 1 "1 'i CD a I -i C) 0 C. C) C) (0 CD a CD C) C) a . . . . . H v 0 U) cl- rD C) F. 1. CD H I -i Ln . . . . . . . . . . m m Ln m Ln In n m L, m Ln Ln Ln rHj al Ln Ln HH 1-1 1-1 1-4 1-1 --1 1-1 H I an 2 ID C) 00 U U U m rnmmmmmm m (1) mmmmm m P: ,_I CD o 0 U 0 4 10 tw ri) M ca ul En m m m W U) U) CO cri U) W W, Di Px a P, (n W 0x P4 P: P: P4 P; P. O H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H w 0 P � u 4 0 cn IN, r�4 0 H � I 4U M W N � � N N fl,41 64 a W z R I H r�l W 11 L L x�l LZ ca L8 03 LS ol 01 xH UH L m L�l Ls Ga a-0,8 1112 00 H H p H H H ol N cq z m O� cq "N - �. I I ' I � ' ' ' �l r:, �D �� tl rD �D �D �l rD �D aD rl 0 P4li 0 H �Hq P4 N CN (3� 0 1 C) 0 C:) a 4 cq N P 40 W000000000000000 1-104 I -q �l 4 14 �� 0 4 0 �41-1 0 41-104 N, P� 0 8 -1 W 0 OH �A 0 M 0 z 0 2% 0 �4 04 01 H N P4 Z N H 04 u �H-- 04 N P4 � N N Hry I r-� P4 fL� F�4 �9: �3): N P' U) a) I �D p da Ln H i F4 E� oj w ol W p L�j W n M M r r4 0 z lu)) ul rg �'D �l H H R R 00 08zz8zzzzzzz8�zz 0000000 00 () H CD ul n m w U - U x u 00 (34 P4 �11 O� N P4 a, N C14 N CA H > > WE- E� 0 E-4 p a, 04 N P4 12� U) ulm M m m w w cn ul co �D 1-1 W� 14 (D W c, F4 C, () U C) ®0 ® N M P, m ul 00 0 00 m co H C) QQ I cq ol (,3 N H 1-4 --1 C11 N 1-1 1-1 cq N N N N N N N N CN N N N N N N CN C) 01.1 ol .1 .1 .1 ol C, C, C, a (0 C) O CD CD C) CD C) C) C) C) CD C) a 0 CD CD CD CD CD a 0 CD 0 a (D 0 C) CD CD (D 0 Cl CD (D CD CD C) CD C) C) (D 0 C) CD �oC) C) Co C) CD 00 CD C) C) C) C:) C) CD CD C:) C) C) C) m 00 C) 000000000000000 0 0 C> CD a 0 CD C) (D 0 Cl (0 (D C) C) 0 (D 0 'A 0 C) C) 0 C) CD 0 CD CD PO4 C:, C:, 2 C� -, M, 'D N CII) M, ID I N . r- I 10 I C, . m 11 11 .1 co . .1 co 01 O " M, r- a 11 r- C) r- C) N -- --I N 11 ri C) OM MN C14 m 0 CD 000 000000000000 I -i CD 11 CD 11 00 '0 m '4' 1-1 NN 1-1 cq lDN Ne- 11 clq C11 Ne -1 N 1-1 1-1 1-1 1-1 1-4 1-1 1-4 H -I I -i -i H 'A 1-4 1-1 -i H H H 'A CD I CD O m C) m OM Ori I -i C) 1-4 OM Hh I -i 1-11-4 Ort 1-1 'A I -i --1 11H 14 'A 14 -i 11 14 'A I to In Lc) In In In to Ln to 1-4 LO P W I In Ln Ln In N cq cq In dl N CN Ln to Ln Ln In Ln In 1 O O C, 11 C) C3 CD C) O CD Ln In Ln E E l M Ln m Lf) M In m In c) c) In c) In m In C) In c) 0 In m to Ift to do dP lfi do do do do do do tll In In do -0-0 1z, C) r- r 0 C, r- m Ln Ln m Ln M M Ln M m m M Ln n m m r" Ln M C', N I- . -1 . . N '-0 N 1- �, " 11 " .1 .1 N .1 1 1 C, 1 1- H W" C� C) C) C) C:) C) CD C) C� C) C) C) 0 (D C) CD a C) 0 CD (=) c) m 0 m m m m m m m m m Ln In tr) Ln C. Lf) W A -A rl A r -I -I r -I Cq r -I I -i N cq N " (q N N NNN"NNNN r -I N CD "D M co Cq 'd, -0 C) C) C:, c� CD CD CD CD 0 c• 0 0 00 c� - c' 010000)c)'.C, w 000 ' 0 m c)'. m r- Ln co O - Ln CD - 00 - u) (N 0 -A - cl cl 00 C) w C� C� r� C� -� C C1 ID 00 -4 w (D N m 'o C'I m MW Lf) C) VA In C) C:) C) OD 00 ll� 00 r- r- �T 10 w C� V)- 'A I -i 'A cq H 'o cq CD N w 'i r- m Ln m mIDM CD cq 0 1-1 r- m C) IV m (D C3 CD kD Ln da C3 cn CD 0) In 1* 'A -lp C:) W —1.0 vl-,-i 'A 4L* 1- 1 m ff) m cq J). 'A 0 01 W Cj) r00 0) 01 m m CD I -i n C7 V C3't '2 c 6l M V M r- M r... -41 r r C:) CD C� C.) C. CD C� CD N cli C11 cq cq P1 C1 9 U 0 0ak I I I I i O 0 z Z, z zZ H H F1 H H HH H H HQ FA H HH El Eq E., HU) En (a M U) m M rn U) E-1 H 11 p H p p p E -i p E+ p I'D O 0 ::D a 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 tD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ln CN 00 co C,q CD O CD m C:) 00 m lD N C, m CD n O I- a% cq U) CD 00 C) 'v 00 Ln Lf) O n ff) n OD 0) co U) r.- m m lD M I -i -A 1-4 1- C, cq 'A m r- cy) Co CD m H w N N Ul � w LD N H rl) n C) C) LI- �q 1-1 cli CN m z m m m CD CY) .14, Lf) I I Ln w w w H H C11 cq co C� m 1-1 CD CN H 1-4 /4 0 H H H U Ln -i U) cr) U0 0 F4 0 04 P4 0 u zLn H P: P4 P. 04 H 0. 0 Ln 11 u m 0 F4 E� p z M H M H H -i CD -1 U 0 6 �' zUUJ .� C:, z 0 E� p WRC U " u 0 0 z H z pq EH 4 H 00 0 04 z Z, HH W H N P� CA N 00 Oa 1314 H HI- i CD H W H W m z E� p H p w P4 4 H H W 0 N 4 P� 4 P� m w m U) .4 � El 04 P� V) r4 > H m p (4 p! M 0 2 2 E No Ex- 0 o �4 H X P4 P� 0 z W EA EA H R4 F -I F -I 04 N F -I 0 H 0 0 0 '1 m P� 4Z4 z 14 B d H E, u P �D RI H 04H OU m P� ri) P>� pq E) H C:) 0 V4 rl P, � 0 M N M N M u P4 LS x cn H W m ca �-i Q E� H u W R 0 14 H 0 z w UH QW r*, p M H �4 U F� H 0 U z zoo H EA 4 4 Q H p z N N H H H z >z 0 04 (.) H H 0 (D H Nn C) P�• A rq 0 N CD H N 0 C:) 1-1 (D C:) ®M OW N P4 N P4 U U r-� 04 N 04 C9 cq C11 N N (N li N cq N I -i N N cq N cl cq N 04 C, C, C:, 0 CD CD CD CD C) C) 0 w C) C, C) 0 0 0 C. CD C) 0 C) CD CD C) C) CD 0 -11a CD 00 C) CD 0 O (D O (D 1-1 CD (D 0 0 CD 0 CD C) CD OD C) LI) CD CD CD 0 C) C) CD w C) C) CD C) (D C) C) 0 (D '-A (D -i CD CD CD C) C. 0 CD -4 CD CD C) m 1 00 1 m I NI I C.,, I Ln I co 1 00 1 w I Lo I m 1 00 1 1 1 1 L) I 00C:) cD I I OD CD 00 C� 10 CD I :> . I'll . I �, . . r- . 11 . - - 1. . "I . . . . . CLI . . 1-1 O r- 0 (n 0 w C) CD 00 C (N CD L- � C13 CD CY) (0 clq C) r- cli I'D CD C) CD C) cq cD (n (D 'A C) CD 11'A OD I -i -A 'A 1-1 H -A OD Cn d, I -i N Ln Cq m -I CN 1-1 N m CD 1-1 1-1 1-1 -A cq 14 0)"0 cq HH Ori CD -4 r.1 A 1-1 ri 1-1 OM OH HN Hrl 0 'A rIM 1-1 clq CD 'A 'A 'A 1-1 HM OM 1-1 HH LO to M Lr) ur) If) V) cli Ln V) Ln cq Ln Ln Lf) Ln Ln Lf) Ln Ln 0 CD CD C, C, C, O O O O O O O O O C) (Y) r -I 14t- r- rl- r- N -11 c:) 1-1 14 w C) N c'l c4 cq 00 Ln Lf) Ln m m m Lr) Mm Lf) en CD L,) Ln H Ln Lf) 11) m U) m in 0 Ln w w k.0 w ur) W Lr) m U) Mm 1-1 (2:) 1 -1 1 -1 1 -, I I HI 'A I -, I r-, I -, , " (1 11 C) I . . I . I . I - -- o it) r- m rl- m r- m m r- m rl- 11 r- (D r- Lr) r- rn r- 11) r- w r- W ID W �D r- kD t- cq r- m m CN I H 0 Ln 0 Ln 0 0 N I N I I N I C\l I NI N I I N I N I N I I I I c] I Cl I " I I I- C:, 11 C:� 0 n 11 C:) -, I- 1 11 4, J) --o 1-4 -� 0 NN 1� 0 '- C:, 0 Ln 0 O CD O CD CD C:, CD C:3 0 '71, C) m CD C:) C) C:, 0 cz) C�' C) (D C:, CD C) C) CD r -I Cq 1-4 'A 11 'A 'A r -I I -i r -I -, -4 1-1 C", N 'A N 'A 'I �A V) r -I 11 CN 1-1 CN �l HH 1-1 r -I --I Ln U) CD 0 CD C:� r -I (00 v -" �v " 11 r -I 14 '1 CD CD C) C3 =, 0 (=, 0 C:) C) M OD 0 C) C� C� c . . . C� C, C� C, � C, C, C, 0 0 � 0 L� L, C� C� C, m L� 11) Ln M ", r- 00 kD Lm CD - C) CD C� C� cq - -I r- r- - . a) . C) 0) (D w CN CN (N CDLnCD U) r- r- Nm 00 C3 ul O O U) Ln a C:, m (3) W C) OU) 0) MW 'A C11 CD N r- N Ln CD m w m r- P do N -E} 00 ilk -0 'D a Ln N [- CD C) -, (n 14.0 'j, Ln V). m CD 11 00 if). N r- WL� W 'A r- An- N C) 0) m m H C:, Vi r -I lik In w 11 00 L} m cli 'r Ln w r- Go M (D H N M <yL LO k.0 r- co O C) CD CD C.D C) H r -i ri 1-4 -1 1-1 H 1-4 r -I 44 -4 C) C) CD C) OC) Cl (D CD C) C) C) cq N Cq N CN N clq C9 cli N N N N N (N n --II --I M j I -i H 1-1 H H -1 1-1 1-1 N Ln E Hw n I u CJ I a 0z 0 z 0 z 0 0 0 0 0 z 4 z z R 2 H H HQ H HQ P p C, E< p U) m ul U) U) U) rf) Ul Ul ul Ul 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ln Ln O Ln m Na (D CD 0) Ln L- Ln Ln Lf) UD Ln Ln H 1-1 tq 1-1 aC) I -i cN 00 ...1 0 (D ICD Hr- w iH M w H 1-4 Ln v H w L- w w 00 -.V W I to ry)w O t71 I00 M M1 0-1 Gk;M w m r.) Lnl eel r- 00 2 ") U) '-I ...I --I m 01 woo 00 LO I;v w hr -00 OD Wo \\ 1.4 LI) cn 'A H W m m Ch m u C) a) 0) a, a, 11 U rl, cq 14, N w ca H I --i --I H m O LD Cq Cri cq U) 0 Pw ul m U) W W 0 EA 61 LO P, Q� N E HI P� El �D CD 0 U) z ri H OP: P: P z0 U)E+ H w Pa (0 00 z 0 u H z 4 H F., 0 �4 m c00 1--1 U 04 H N 0 E 9 4 9 0 0een C7 r-4 r14 (1) UH p N 04 P4 HH 0 E Ea NN UlH M P< 1� ri) 0 ON ul 0 w � � 1� 1, Cia T U, E., U, U, P� u U) U) I I W cn ri 0 ;4 N u P� f4 P� P� ul C) W rq W H H P4 H CD 0 E, N H N H 0 W C) H 0004 U U) U U wa cq cq z Q Ow 04 N 0 0 " N a, N O, 0 QH H #I- #t� 2 H q r�4 000 E I '-, � Z > (14 N P, 0 0 0 E� P ul r4 w r4 W P4 04 0 E� N U PI N n4 U F4 U) Ul 'D M 1.D M 0 U) cn E, u m HaGc ca H W w p �. N 0 u 0 N 'A E-" ")U 'PD El 2 El 2 F4 OW R U) E� r4 Ha z R 0 m H OH H �4 C) �4 n 00 0 04 R En m m U) H m N rj) U) Q U) M E� Q E-1 H " El ElIanp z El � x ,_A C:) u U 0 1-1 u CD C, 0 C, H C, � H � R B 00 Q p 0 U) U) U) D4 r14 (.) u p E, N EA N ul cli Cq C14 H 'A 1-1 CN N H H N Cq Cq N Cq N N Cq N N N N cq N 66 6 (D CD C3 C) CD n CD C:) CD CD C3 O CD " CD a Ln c) Ln CD CD O C) CD C) C) 0 CD (0 (D CD n O CD C) (D CD OD C) N N C11 N 0 0 (D 0 0 0 C) CD 0 CD C) 0 (D C) (D 0 CD 0 00 C) Lf) Ln Ln In C) C) CD CD C) C:) (D 0 CD CD C) C) 0 C) C) (D CD C) Ln c) Ln Ln Ln Lf) CD CD CD 0 0cc) C3 CD -, I C:) C,4 I CD m I (D co I CD C:) I C3 C) 1 1 1 1 1 (D 0 0 CD C) 'n 1 C:) m 1 1 HCD C:, 1 1 1 1 -1 -4 H I A Lr) 1 C) cn 1 (D I I I I I . . . . C, . 1 1cl, . . . . w 1-1 1) . 11 C, . . -Z" . C, 1 11 . I . I - . . I . 11 CD C) HO r- cq N (nm doO NO r- 11 r- " III CD CD (D (D C) m (D L- CD CD w CD C) C) 0 Llr) 0 h0 .4zv 1-4 ON N M Cel <H I -i NH C) .0 C) cli Lr) H I -i -i 1i 1-1 OH C=) dv 110 Ln I -i 'A 'A 11 cq 1-1 Na) CD m C) 1-1 'A 0 cq C) 1.1 -A m (D cq C) 1-1 0 1-1 11 11 H --I C) H C) (,) r) O I -i r -I 1-1 r -I 0-1 r -I M al it) V) Cq CN cli U) Ln CN (N Ln Lf) Lin Ln Ln Ln Lf) Lf) Lin Ln u) Ln V) lll C) CD O C) 0 CD CD O O O CD . . . . O r- rl- 0 � 0 Ln L Ln L un L Zld Lf) 0 C) in 0 C:) Lr) HLf) 1-1 Lr) CD 0 cq cN cq cq N CNm Ln N M00 OD 00 00 m Lf) C) M m Ln M C) 0 CD f) C) kD w w w �O w m Lf) V) f) f) m 0 1 1 -, I -, I I -, I 1 1-4 1 1 1 1 1 1 . . 1 -, I 1 I . . '.1 1 1 1 1 H I I . -, I CD CD I- C) I- C) CD -- 0 1 . I . I . . . . I . . I . MM r- (n r- 0 C) r- w r. m r- m t- m h C> r- w w w w w r- m r- w Ln r- Ln Ln Ln Lin r- m r- 0 1 1 CN 1 cli I I N I N I N I0 � cq I Cq I NI I I I I N I C', I I C', I I I I C', I C', I 0 CD C:) -1 CD C) 0 CD 0 Iq N 110 '- . I -, 41 4 11 CD CD C:) C) CD C) C) 0 00 C) CD CD C:) C) C:, C, a (=) c� Ln Ln a C:, CD o Ln C:, 'r -;T -IV 0 C) 010 H 'A H 'A 1-1 H 'A 'A V) 11 H 11 '1 1-1 Ln H 1-1 H1-1 H 1-1 NN 1-1 H H 11 CA HCN " N N H -, r -I cq Ln C CD C> H C) O Cl 1-4 -, 0 C:, CD C:, m w C) CD rw (�) (�) co w r- C) (=> 0 C3 G\ " '� C:' a C� CD Ln C:) WO, 11 00 9 CD •m0 ! m 1 9 C-) 9 (D C) 0) r- 00 C:, (D co Ln da m 0 L- C, 00 - .9 C, C� Ic"I N[® a) U) MOD ` C-4 00 A 'A 00 m C) dL m cD %D m r- C� 1.1 r- "0(,) 04 Hal OD 00 C) C14 1-1 00 0) I.D Ln p C14 00 ro -1 11 11 -[am m w M Lf) m lu� --, NO CD N cn w " V). H VY CN r- r® .0 N w 0') o i N m rn Ln w E- CX) m CD 1.4 cq N N C14 N N N h7 cq m m O CD CD C, C, CD n 0 C3 O0CD Oq CN C*ll N Cq N cq i _q 1 1-4 -1 1-1 --1 I U W x U H a O a z z H z z 4 z z z z z Ei c_- H Ei E, N UB rn cR Ln Ui Un en U) e] rR en cR Ua rn El E+ N P E+ E+ E+ N E+ E+ H Ei Fi Ew x a a v x x x �D a x a x O O 00 O O O O O d O O d O Ln LD H H Ln Ln ri Cil r{ w \ III .. \ m W m Pi O a C' t O \ m ul Ln C"- C'^ dt m m ul I H ILO r{ r{ �;.• Ln w Ori O C~ 00 O H x H L- H H H M M Ln T CO r -i H O W r.- r -i m N I O W W LD O Ln I W CJ N O N VI O m w N N Ln •cM O to \. I- O O 1 r-{ Ln Ln U) rat r -i H C7 CF1 O aN C'- a h7 Ln Ln Ln O 01 O o e -i a O N 0.-{ pq Ul r- m m N a Ln z z H Ln Ln Ln O O \ r{ H H uS Ua Ln \ \ \ H H H Ln Ln Ln Q w Q U Ln m ami Ho0o 4� gH H r.4w a,, `Ln ry' c-- d', m H H H H H F, -I H O a "^* H Ln H H W %-i H H z � Ix O Ln z I no w w FLx Fla H pm Cn O �/-, a f.� CO [� E+ E H E 00 0,4 u) O z z w z E E -I M H In Px Om dtD P, a°� wH G=a EC w �iOO O aZ' d, d. �] H �-� O HMI H li a0.Qi aQe aQi He°7 "i CHP] H H H W H z d.°FTy W RL; U alfl �7 LD Ln El z HW �u) EE�oLWia H�®x OU F+ HCwJ C.7 r�N r N HLnmLn U W eJH U U H o daO U) E+ U Ln z 0W Ulo H\H HH 9 H 0 a a a a W P> UIW H Ho\\\ zp4 P > wz a zEO0P Wen W C=7 Ei Q z za W -iO0O H x W W OH cnE-IHCDP a b E+ z P4 U) a 00 00 \Hri A wco W 0 aW H H zzvaz mPa a w a Hz "{ O Nw Nw I o\\\ x xH xU]`,7 wa°, WHH H d,dUSo �C O aCx7t�k x H H U)H®o0 E W E1.4 E, O H a H ,s+ C7wzw U O W W W C4 I H H r -I Q E-+ Q b H W' H P: O H z Xa U UI H rS, a' H �U W U Wt` I I I OA,' dE< OH HU w H H��`. xrS Ui 4Y114 Ci; H H aNhh[� mo U4 Ulw UI U1 Q U]H °$CR UiHU] A,° E -I iJ UN UO 0 011 ,m \ N N N d W W H H H a \\\ o fi4 x7zW a N H W -{ W O al rn m N [� m P o H o o �� 0 W p W o N Ui 0 0 O o Ln m°•.. r era E+ w a a s rn a x Q x U a x N N r°♦ H H N N N N N N N N N N N 1-4 N N N ri N I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I f I I I I I I I I 1 I O O O O O O N O O Ln O O O O O O O O N O O r{ O O O O O O O O N N O O O O O O O O O O O Ln O O O O O O LO O Ln Ln O O O O O 0 0 0 Ln O O H O O 0 0 0 0 Ln O Ln Ln O O O O O 0 0 CD r-1 O O tD O O O O O O ri O H e -i O O O O O O O O ri O O +-i HI H I d+ 1 I I I a1 1 I O I I O 1 m I I I I N I I I M I Ln I Ln I C® I O 61 m a 5 M L D l O C^ L D O C S O I 0 N O O O O L D 0 0 0 0 d m 0 W O W O O O W W V a 0 O MO m0 co OO Ln 1-4 r- CD L`O ID OO a1O W 0000 OONO NN NLn LnN LOO W O�4 0 d ONN NN OH O H mr-i H rnH m -I -i-Ir-i Orim H L m O M atm LnH m OM Om OH ri 1{ C) 0®D 0 -1 Orifi Ori Ommmm Om Nm Om OM ON Or -i O m Ln N N N Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln N Ln Ln Ln N Ln I I I I f I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 6 I I O O O O O a1 O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 H O O O H O O O Nm CD Lb M N NN N M O M <q H O Lf) m M tLn m to O CN O O N Ln n Lr) Ll Ln Ln Ln Ln to Ln tD LD LD LD Ln tD OLD Ln H Ln N Ln O w Ln tD Ln r -I I H f H I I I I H I r -I 1 ri I 6 H I ri P I I I H I P I ri I ri I H I H I H \O\O \000tH \o \0 \oo \o \0000 \000 \o \0 \0 \o \ L® m [^ M CD O O O N co Ln Ib Ln co Ln Ln CD Ln co w w w LD co W W W OD ri co N 00 LD OD LD Lb N I N I N I I I I N I N I N I I N I N I f I I N I I I N I N I N 1 NCD N \O \O \O O O O \O \r1 \1* dv \H \N N O N \O ri O \r -I \O \ H \O \ 0 0 O O O O O O O O co O Ln O �, °cr O Ln O u) Ln O Ln O O O O O O O O O O O O O H '1 'A Hri ri H14 HN HN HNN HN HN NHN li'A Ln filo r -IH 1-i Ln r{H ri d+ m m w O O O N O O 01 O O d, dl In Ln LD Ln r-ai0 O3 In d, Co Ln r-Lnm ®30 Oh-iLn0 limas Ln Ln0 OO 0a{ OO O •d+ Ln W L®HCD W ds Ln al co 41Hul d, 65 a1 L® Ln O W O ° � W - p . . . Ln Cry . Ln . - ri Cay N . N CD Ln r- p 1-1 OD OH W c -1O d+m MM NLnm a1H OL® W r -I Ln NLn Ln0 r- (q OO ID Ln ch M HH .-{H Ln H LD LOM tlev u1M Mcf [® hal LOO N OLD Nal atm N[® V)- 00 -Ek LD Hr N 41). r-4 Wwe-i Ln H H"NOLf) vt N L? r- 00 MMM � if,N cN O Ln 1L r H m O Ta H N vo H H M V)- m t0- r -i VP ^.ri •1, ,M '�+ '7� tri •cN •s� C'C`- C`- f`- C C"C'C'"C^ h C^ C'^ L'"• C' O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N r.A .-{ 1-1 ,-{ ,-A -4 ,..,q ax El m W 8 m U 1 H I r -i O 1 H �1 I Ln H 1 ri 1 o N C C) I Z I h QU u O Y z r I a O� H 1 H I Ln H i � � I r G x�j Pa N Q j. rn I rrni rte- aC7M QW r H N ,A� U •• I �UCW7 n � 4 EI rr lD H Ji tl U U w Ln P H I' H Q G U rl I U W \ V q U C7 ul I N C) I q A I 8 U 1 U U I O 1 I I I I �k I G I W I G x I W V I x I U O 1 � �31 a w w P C7 00 0 0 0 0 Ch 0 0 C7 U Ch z z z z z z z z z z z H H H H H H H H H H H H H � H H E+ H E+ N E+ p H H H H N UHJ i!1 in u1 u1 ell M 0 e E1 H EN H p EN p EH D DO O O O O O O O O O O O O z O H Ln E+ ra KC H \ G 0 n H d+ W CD 0 N m L CD r a n -Ad 0 o r Go r-1 ro CD a r m la O O w H Ln M -I Ln r [- r m O Aa' 0 Ln m I r o O CD CD r n al r1 Ln N r m CD Cr 'IVm at m w M H O O o to H r 0 Ln N H ll�m O O lD al w H ri rl w x o O o N al r m N 0) al d O ri r `vim N \ US ri l0 E{ O O ld�m N r Ln al co a) H O O o e -i 7H 00 o p 0 m M� Ln w m m d in al U N a H w H W z In H H ply HH7 Q N EH I -q Q W u O W 10-I 0,' H H H ' W 0 Hz rta az °ems-, zH W U H 0`1, O a m Pi H C7 W Q>4 W w O O OIx rD W W p'. d®U HNH O HHHO ulW >E, ca �y Na O ',S' a W O HH 0 O 4 W 0� 0UU wPP: P: P; P;NP: UH WU UO OH HP Ci Cn Pi O a 0.'i 000`e. '!'-eOOORi0 H"a3 u1 a' W Nw n0 P;N W W W OH H O UC+f+00a aa0N ".~aP' H HU HM �,H [c]� en W w H H a a' W p0..�1 R4 U W H w H W H H rn H ul 0 H E+ P4 a P: rn W u1 +� Ix W x H '��, p 0 0.a KC Cn En xH W H W a' 00 'r`ty0 W w O fiHOOUUUP<H aW F-0 0j P:P W W as H �] aH 1aa W �l E+Ou1 W a E -q O s °s-� .'�- `vim v1 a u1 a' KG a� �e W Is+ \ O en tea o Hx Uu1u1 wKC aP4% a� a WEe �v1W cnN W O H s✓� W co E+ Es UxxPPW W W MD a'Z, O d; x 0.l�-1 U)OP, H en u1 U O M en u1 W O H O U W P z W m W 0 W is G 0 m H rD WW W W w O z O en u 0 Ha W W W P:64>15+5+ W �l w9 O[4 0 HH x WHa H x HEn,baa 4M ODUOOI-1�74QU P;E, P; e/:H vl m0 E+ H p HHHHH HH 14H en rte., a w Ei Q) �tiWgl 0 0 ramex o ON GW,HH H,�+'Fw%a o1Wi d v+C�.7 0 o 00 oW q or.� 0 E W FQ E< O O M en N N G, G O a 0.l cn to N N N 111-1 N CV N N N N N N N N N ri N I -i N N N N N Ln O o 0 0 O O O co o 0 0 0 0 o Ln O O O o o O ld) O O O -.H O o VI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 o O 0 0 0 1-i O m 0 Ln o0 Ln o0000000o m o 0 0 0 0 Or 0 tla O Lf) 0 0 Lr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e,N O O o O O o 10 O ,--IO H O O H O o p p O O O o o ri O CD O O O ori o 1 0 1 Qt 1 LD I 1 Ln I I 1 I I I I I I 1 W I ri I 0 1 al I O I Ln I M I I N I .-1 rO r- CD Od�-N 0o m0 o o 000000 11 In eH r0 Mal Mo m0 000 0H O OD 0 H O Ln r -i H 00 H 0000o 0000 m 0 N. --I 0 m MN a) O 1-10 m M M COO H dv -i 11H OOO Gori 01-1 ri H HH1-I 1-i HH O. --I HO 0M dlm LDH NH 0mm 00 -i H O M O r d O O O O -A O m m M m m m m m m H r 1 1- I O O m O N O m 1-111 O m m o v- i Ln Ill Ln N N Ln Ln Ln In M Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln In N Ln N In In Ln Ln Ln I I I I I I I I I I I I I I f I I I I I I I I I O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 6 O Ln ri 1-i O HH m O O m H r°I m M d� dl cp Ln H ri O ri O M al al m 1-I dd If71D Ln w Ln O o II) l0 Ln w l0 l0 l0 w 10 l0 l0 w Ln d1 1n O Ln H Ln O In l0 Ln Ln Ln m m Ln LO I r -I I H I H I I ri I H I I I 1 I I I I I ri I H I .-1 1 H I ri I ri 1 H I I ri I O \ O \ O \ 0 0 \ O \ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \ O \ O \ O \ O \ O \ O \ LnLno m \ dl OLD CO tD 00 0 0 0 w060 tO lD lD LD l0 LD lD LO 0 C% 0 0 00 .-I 0 ID 00 ID 0 1I7 0 m m m 0 L0 B N I N 1 N 1 1 N 1 N I I I I 1 I 1 I 1 N I N 1 N I N I N 1 N 1 N I I N 1 L n \ O \ C% \ O O \ d a \ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \ L n \ O \ O \ H \ O \ O \ O O \ O O O o Oda O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O o O O o o O O o 0 o O cv o 0 m ri ri HN HH1-1 HN HHHHHH HHRH rim HH ri ri HLn ri ri H. -i HriN H14 In 0 0 o Ln o r -I al o dl o N Ol O T Ln 0 0 O o o r O d+ H LD H 0 m ri LD Ln N O 0 O ri al al 0 0 Ol d� 0 0 m oral a) a) O •rn O o O r 0eA 0r almda0 O O •a1 O Ol O ON Ol 0 Ln O al ,� p eV p N 0 0 . do . m . O N0 NLn alMr ral ,-I C)"W ro.--+Nr Loo MN mo riN fn OD o0 frim 00 0) m V}N 0 N NN Lo a) r - o. -i LD Lo dlr mwm "I.w L}M dlm NH mm LOO HO" dh 00 N i!P 0 V� ri H V1• a) N LD m ri N .-i ri ih eN Vi N Vi- M N w Vt ri -Er -Cr N lD r SII ryE N SSP O C'C7 N N 0 c91 d+ O N ar cN da O N O Ln =y+ O N 1i M eN O N N Idi ci+ O N m M dl O N eH In da o N Ln In Va O N LD Ln 'da O N r 0 Ln Ln �N da O O N N H H H H H 1-1 H H 1-4 .-i v -N H ,"'i H H H H H H H H H H H H H H z H H H H H F -I H H H H H H H H H E E E+ E E N E+ P E+ E E+ N H H H l'!) Ua U1 U5 UI U) U) to m U) U) U) m m co H H N H E+ EI H EL H H H Ei E� E+ H �3 �D �D U 'a �D tD U �D �D �D O 0 O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O N N \ N N N N N N N N N �4f-- N N N �k N N cq N 4k #k \ N N N N N N N N O N N N N N N N N 'A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d+ O O LC) Ln H H H H H H H H C) W '-1 H '-1 E+ H E+ P E� E+ H H h W H .-I rl U U U U U U U U U 0% C'- W N U U) H H ori Lf) a m N h 00w h N 11 U1 W W W W W W W W a 6) O) 61 � N Ul ✓°'' W W Q E-+ W Q Q p (a ^ eH 04 U N UI 1�1 0 U Ut U O W U] H U Ln Ln Ln H Ln Lit Ln tit Ln Ln PS 90 lx W \ \ W \ \ N E\ E\ W O N W W U °:4 et+ d� �I� ..ma�yy , - - u M F.4 N m Ni Nr -{H N `,NN "HN U)NN U)N 1.*.iN N N H Uk HU] NN '� Pa\ [4°\ \\ W\ `00\ \ \ W j W W N EI I W I I o W o W o 0 0 0 H o W o W o O 0 P' UCH �.-t cnH in cn 4 W Q W W �xj H C7 N Cfd N HNN rC U U P: P; PD Ua 04 N O N0 N NN ,.> N �`] N N N [YaC70 H W 70 HN P4 04 N >qN qN W NN M N N Cq[�W N M WN O W N U} N N U) N N H 0k Pk 0k W 0k 0k W ak I Pk H 01 1 1 C1] Z (� U2 I-1 N N N W N N U N H N f-{ N H N H N aL� N +� N KC N U N N N L� Pa F1 N 4a N P N N O W OH H Fu ✓ a, G C%1 �'C sa H C7 W W W N'zaE ' W N �l Oi�P �'4 g +8 �`�'ia`�-i W?a W'z W z W 14 U NL -1 L-1 HOP; C7!� I Ln ��CiN HNN O O O OO �O 6A E-10 PO C7 O H H Py ,4 O L� W =-1 m 4 H Ei H H H m H H OI H a H ey4 H �° H 42 4; H P F4 P4 N KC � N I Ln H to Lf) °� E-+ H � E+ O N H SC E+ H E+ E+ N E+ H H1 H H J G��d N N ca 'A ;> 'A P --i �C U U U a U U P U cn U cn U c a U �G rn yl �a �i C7 0 0 � � � � � U :� U as H N 7 G4 O E< ✓ Ca Q Gi G1 6a Ca 41 is C1 O oUCH.1 ®OU 000 00 02 o OQ oq oW 0W0 CD W7 0W 0W oQ 0U N N N N N r -I r -I 11 rA H H .-1 H N H H 11 H N O O O Ln O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r -I O O O O O Co O O O O O O O O O O O O h O O O 0 0 O O O O O O O O O N O O O dl O O O 00 O O O O O O O Co O M O O O r -I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O H dL I I h 1 I Ln I da I h I W I I m I e -A I 'A I W' I ri I O I O I 0 1 H 1 ri O O I'll M M -14,O N O N N W OD O LI) . , Ln N n H Ln O 0) Ln v Ln da Ln e1 Ln Q1 O ODOO h 00 OD (D W M m .A OLf) ri MN W N W N 'A NO d4N Lf)N Lf) C13 LnN 00 OH r1 m -V Co Mri ON r- CA MN N r1 N HN 'Acq O NO) 'AN W N ON 00N OH O M M O M M O M ri ri O 'A 01-114 r-1 H H ri r1 H r-1 ri W ri ri O ri O H O 1-1 Ori Ln Ln Ln Ln Lf) N N N N N N N N dA N N N N Lf) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Ol 61 r1 ri Ol O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0) (3) m 6l 61 O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O m LnN N Ln MM LnN LnO LI) C=) Ln OO LnO Lf) C) En Ln OO LnO V) C) Ln (p LnO LnM r -I I 1 r1 I 1 r -I I rl I rl 1 r -I I I r -I I r1 I r -I I H I I ra I rl I rl I H I ri I \ 0 0 \ Ln L n\ L n \ O \ O \ 0 0 \ O \ O \ O \ 0 0 \ O \ O \ O \ O \ L I) ODN N O MM 6)N 0)O 0)O 6)00 0)O O)O 0)O O)00 m0 010 Ol0 010 MM N I I N I I N 1 N 1 N I N 1 I N I N I N I N I I N I NI N I N1 O 1 \ 0 0 \ 0 0 \ O \ O \ O \ 0 0 \ O \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 0 \ O \ O \ O \ O \ O 0 0 0 O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O rJ O H ri 1-1 r-1 1-1 N 'A H 1-1 ri rd '-1 'A H H r1 r1 ri H H H H 1.1 ,-i r-1 ri '-i H 'A H ri H H 'A O h 00 O O cc) Ln d1 O 6) O M W O M Lf) M h N 0) W L n O W O L f) O d+ 00 0 c-1 L n L n d< O O W Ol O o co L n M M co W O O M •M e -I • a)O Ln W • 11 I Ln •. W O •O ° Ln M W "I 0 . O " . c -i rq W . . W W M M h r -I N co . C'. W O O h m '-J O 6) Ln ri H H M '-i Ln d1 W N W h 0) W [� N H r- M ri C® N Ln W N h Q)- Va N Vr do N Ln O U} Ln L® H 6) ri N m Ce cM N M h V). Ln ri W r-1 ri M 'v h N Ln O N yr Ln H h M h N Vf M tfk dL VY M +h W vt H VY tlL dc* N O O +11 ri M H O � r-1 m O 1-1 N r) Ve Ln W h 00 m 0 '-i N M Ln W W W W W W W W W W C^ d� eN CA CL do zo zt+ co Ve 'cN dt cM h h h h C'^ C- h C^ r- h h C,- h h h O O O O O O 0 0 O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N H 1-1 rl 11 rl 1 l P A a ^I 3-^I w.....p r......V 11 H H m 0 U H O H d d I 0 Ln W r- a1 H H H m N O • w O (1) Cv Ln Ln cn W w M m O O O O O O I H EI Ea D D m w r• Ln Ln M '°D G H 1 I I C7 °a''a H Ci z H C7 'mow H C7 z H C7 H U°' H C7 z H I;J z H U' H U '✓'-a H C7 z q2H, U' z q7H� C7 H C7 H C7 H G H W H Pi O U z O Ul H H U H W W U' a O W r I H rn E+ O H Ln H D O H En H D O H Ul H D O H U) H O E+ M H D O H en H D O H Ul H O H ca H D O H Cn E+ D O H en H D O N cn O E+ Ul H D O H va EI D O H va H D O H cn H D O HHC u H u ri I NC I N I N i H 1 N N l I Ln U) Ln i N O In H H mI m 0 c11 N L^m O m Ln I O O O O O m l H O m 0 OH O m Ln f O O O O O m I 10 0 m O Or -1 O M Ln I CD O 6n H ri m l N O m tl+ -IV O m m I O Ln In do H at I h 0 I O H H O H Ln I O O O O O H I I C` H and O N N I O O O O O d� I N O m H Od H N N I 0 U H O H EI d 4 O Ln W r- a1 H H H m N O • w O (1) Cv Ln Ln cn W w M m O O O O O O I H EI Ea D D m w r• Ln Ln 1-4 -I+ at H In Y--1 ar Ln I O O N I Ln m CJ m H H Ln m w H In w H U) Lr) � LS H U) tY Qj H coN W Ln Ln H O N H Pe W U) r- m m m to m H tle H Ln m a) a) rm O O 1 O H H I Ln H m N H .--0 O �JL m H r- N1 co m W r- H N W N r0 o P H H \ \ O O H H 1 I M H N \\ a) m O O z H U H W W W O O z Dq N O U cn U' W W wa P Pa W DD alU)cn W O al W ODU H U) W U H > W W Ul .�j ZN HN W W ol0 U ."e, ua 4 W O H� GHl H U) W U) NUI W W P, H W 0 W W Ei ul W O O H O H Pl O� P< O U U) m Nm W Q rCHKIIU W w Cn W D W H ®> W H Pi O U z O Ul H H U H W W U' a O W U) 0 w KV, U H H Ul „h. W W W w Ul H N 'moi O W H H H O 0 H U) O N H G H E+ � U U� r.7;H (Yl ra o� W,H Ul LS H h C%l O H O N \ H OH W E-A cn KCH UU UW LA U) h U[cl� ON N H U H H U O 9 HH W H [nU z -A H U} o O w H H Pa `>> W W R W cn 'H H o� DW OH 0 O U RC �] i-1 !_7i Oz U) H H Q O cn w W U) a U as W U H Zi H o H Pa � U) U ZZ LJ H cn E+ F�-CI O Pa H taw WW U H w w O [x7 HNC7 H � O U O 7 H W w z In H H H M W zOw KC U UP H W O w UP rx' G~. H U ry° PLz M N W H H C. P, W W W G1 W C7 O zW H Pa W WO H x U U] W W H H of UP G) r -a W EI H O Ul C*� N Lri U) U F- C"3 WU)N Wcn H W D G OD � () O H co H H N N N N N HHC I ri I NC I N I N i H 1 N N l I N f N N i 1 I I O O O O O O O O O O d+ I I L- 0 0 00.10lzv O N N N N i N O In H H mI m 0 c11 N L^m O m Ln I O O O O O m l H O m 0 OH O m Ln f O O O O O m I 10 0 m O Or -1 O M Ln I CD O 6n H ri m l N O m tl+ -IV O m m I O Ln In do H at I h 0 I O H H O H Ln I O O O O O H I I C` H and O N N I O O O O O d� I N O m H Od H N N I O O O O O h l m0 m H O10 ri N N I O N N M H mI m 0 w 0 OD 11 O H LO I O O O O O W I O H O NH H H Ln i O O O O O (� I O O ri O tloH O M In I O O O O O N I W C) NH '1 10 O N N I CD J+ O O LC) In H H H H H I I O O H N eT O HHH H m H Ln Ln I I O O O O O Ill I 1!) O m O NH O M In I O O O O O O O O O O Ov I I I •-1 H C° O O Otl�cH O m m In In 11 I I O O O O Ln O O H I I \ 0 0 mMM O I I \,i H HOO H In Ln I H Ln H H I \ O mH 0 1 \H HO H eia I O In m H I \ O MM O 1 \Ln HO ri N I O tla In -o H I \ O Ma O I \O HO H 'A I H de Ln H H I \ O Mrl O I \ H e -i0 1-1 d1 I O m Ln W ,-i I \ O mW O I \'o ri e% 1-1N O O In O c -I I \ O Mm O I \H HO 1-4 Ln O O Ln O H I \ O mm O I \ H HO H Ln O O Ln O H I \ O mM 0 6 \H HO H Ln O a)r` in M ri I \ L n Mm O f \O HO H H O In M H I \ O mm O I \O ri0 'A H O In m H I \ O MM O I \O HO ri ri O O Ln O rl 1 \ O mm O I \H HO I Ln H ri VI v Ln H H H 1 1 \ 0 0 mHH O f I \ H H ri 00 H�� O w In M H I \ O mM O I \0 HO H H O O w m Ln Ln Ln H I I \ 0 0 mMU) O I I \H H HLOW H N N Ln ct+Va H WO Ln W W O O h0 rn 0)M O 00 m mar 6t ma) O) co N NN O 00 N W N O OO h mcnm m Hm Ln Cm -i EI d 4 O Ln W r- a1 - • w • m m N O • w O (1) Cv I m m N 1-1 O) r 1 M da m O O O M O M W N m ri I LOa)N mm N H mM c* V� 0)m MO m0 m0 Nat tlaO a)m cUw 'olnW Lf) wO-0 9 com W wm hN 'AM Ntlo Ln a) Lim vi.m v}M HN j)- <H 10 d1 HdB Md+m mLn do 6)� V2 H N vt w N r- tL r ri vk N v} to a) H vt do N H t/)- N ut m v} N vk N to Vi -N W W EA d in 'La in 0 s Ln w r- m m O rl cV m ev Ln w h m O) r- r- r- r- r- m m m m m m m m m m C'-- O C) C'- C) CD C'CD CD C) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N CV N N N N N N N r•I I 4....-I H H -1 ,-u H v --d , i H H I U) o C7 C7 U C7 U 00 2 0 U 0 0 r4 iD z p z z z zz Z, U p H H H H H H H H H H Pc P, H p HHEl I HU) M ul U) Cl) U) U) W U) co U) u H El p HE-+ p P p E -q p V" �D �D �3 � 0 0 O 0 -'0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ln Ln (D m (N m Ln CD CZ) C) -1 m H ^31 Cq C\j H m CD m rn 4, 1 i C) m nC) CD 0 C3 CD co C) .1 1 0 1 m HI I --I Ln CD 0 C\7 11 A '2 0) era W In m CD m r In x x (N 0 CD 0 1 cq lD C) C� IV 00 m cq H H P4 P4 C) to CD m m r- r- �o cq 14 -4 �o -i 1-1 0) �o Cl) co 00 OD Ln 1-4 'A Ln Ln Ln 'A Ln N CY) I I m Ln H I CD CX) C) --I H li CN C11 z 0) �D w H N 1-4 1 co H C) p cq I El r-4 m x H to H CD l C.7 0 > z 0 ul p C> H Z N 1-4 Ln co tzn 11 2 N Z20 En 0 P4 P4 Q 0'H (a r=4 p (4 co Ln 0 Ln 0 04 01 11 2 N U 0 E, C4 04 C) E-1 0 N P, Fi 0 0 W 9 pq P (D U) u 114 W H F�4 C) 0 C) 0 H N ul (14 COO Pt0 0 ri F1n HH 0 0 z E, 4 �4 m El , m 9 ry, pq 0 U ri) 'A H 0 ul �-) H ca m 0 w P4 2 engin N ul H 0 ca H Ix P4 C) W P� W P; TA D� N a, A4 0 z 6 0 ri pq Lq P� F-4 0� H 0 H rA N ZOO Z z In u M j 0 N H I El 2 H H W 9 I -q 0 �11 N H 04 0) z H W U H w li. En 00 0 �D 0 H H W O's 0� V) ul U) R 0 2 U) U) H Ol Ln r" H OP E� 0 P� "Z Wu fa4l Lpqq 0 UH K MW H �11 P �H4 N 'H-1 El FX4 EH� lz� 'KII IN N l Q f4 4 C) W I Pr4 U) a U M E-1 ..1 4 W m W UW UH ri H H H rl Z It NN 12, .9 C:) P� CD �D ;D 0 C� H CD 4# P4 E, Q U) era F-4 co Co H r- U) N C, H C, H N H -I Cj CN -I --j cq H H cq H H H cq I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I . ID I . . . . L, Ln (D C) C) CD 0 CD 0 CD CD CD Cl (0 CD O CD CD 0 0 0 0 C:) In C. 0 C) C. C) C) CD C. CD In 0 C) m CD C> H CD C) 0 4# CD HH C) C. C) C) CD CD CD CD c- C) n a CD O to CD C) TW' -i H 000 Ln T H 0 L. T T 0 cD In c) m '-i c:) O 'I m 0 c) H" C, C3 m C, P: I1 .1 .1 .1 1. .1 H 11 N.1 0 0 I O m00 rl ri Lf) c) tbH -i OO to NN oo c) HO c- cq MN a% c) to NN mm MM MN 1.1 " 010 N11 0) IV N 1-1 11 C\l m m m H OH NM dam 00-4 r- (n m H m t- en H m I M C) m ff) 'A C\l 'A m C) Cq 'A 'A H C) " CN n m C) H H cq C) cli C) H CD N cq CD m C3 N C:) N 1 In to to (N Ln cq Ln In C13 N LI) U) N Cq to C13 N to N Cq H -I CD CD (D m ds " 0 w Q 00 OD n CD m H C:) 2 H a 0 r- C) C) Ln p E-4 Ln Ln Ln Ln m Lr) Lt) Ln to In Ln L,) Ln L) C, in 0 V) A H C) M C:) U) In CD CD kD �D C:' C:) 'ZP (D C:) W I -i di u I II I rl I rl I I I I ri I I ri I I ri I rl I rl I rl I I I rl I " I 0 1.. 1 . I C, I . 1 0 . 1. . 1 . I . I . I . I . I CD . I . I . I . m to m H A cn (�) MM en m m to Lr) �o w w '0 w "I w Vo I'D 10 w do -41 'o w ID w 1110 w -,It w H C:l I I Cl 1 0 1 CD 11 ID 1� �,l (D 'I 1� 0.1 Cl .1 (D 'I CD HI Cl Lf) Z I 1 1:1 1 C:l I C:, HH 11 H 11 H C) C, 8 w a C:, C::> C:, C:, Lf) H C) C) Lr) H Lr) 'A -0 �o H (D n H H 1-1 0� 11 Lf) 1-1 Lf) 11 a, li (D a H r �� Lr) 1-1 CD N 4 H H I -i H N N �� Ln ti) 11 11 H H r -I 'A Lf) tn H -1 H Hen tl C) w C�' OD CD a) CD CD 0 C) Cl Ln m m 0 �o C, C) CD co 0 m C:) C�, C) CD 0 n HA a, .1 m O� 00 9.. C� C� q L� to L� to 'o 9 9. 'H) Nr n w (n co Ln m m 0)Cq m C) I -i N w C:) ff) 0 Ln m 00 C� (mD- C� L®O Go Ln w (D wLr) In Ln C� rl- N 11 _i m V)- m 0) A/)- m 00 a) I -i ti) (1) m VW co C- ) m 0) m I m m C) I -q w H to r- Izil NLr) C} m C) (3) Im- Ur m ljt NC:) C) (A vk H Ul- 'A A/)- r - H (D H or i VY 0 C) H cq (n gig In w C.- 00a) n 14, 0 mm a) m M Cl) Ch a) m a) C) (D C) 0 (D 'j, cn Ln LI) U') to In ® CD C) CD C) CD C, CD C) C.) C-) n CD n C\l N (N N cli Cq N N (N N C14 Cq N CN C\l 0 1 H IA 1-1 1-4 1-4 H 1 11 P4 PQ m C'J C7 C'J CJ" C.7 C7 C'7 U' U C.7 C.7 CJ C7 C7 H H H H -i H H N H H H H H H H K �Eii � El K EI H U Ui Ui EI Ui Ui UUi Ui U' F. U) U} Ui Ui U} U) U] H US p H H U7 Ue FUl H H H N C e ED H UF-� Ei 0 0 Ui Ui H C 0 0 a 0 0 0 .0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 r� o CI r�r c� o o r� ra U c� o o Cr N o Ln H n o N N .yI Ln I.n C, o N o ri v -I r9 O r -i N � M =r o o r cn o m 1.4 H W G) I I a \ c. in I.n I 1 o Ln d a o O W o r- P�w d h M d+ cit 'r N o (n x o d m I.n a W r) I O m SPI M O U] w CD c l Ol m O M H I Ln Ell dI ri In H�D H al m N O In w h W M dI 4 r -I Ul 'vI.C) ri H VI "ei O N C• r- 'A M M M M M ";p'T N N N N N Z 'A N H W W CV � H --1 ra H H H H H U H P'~''i H u W W U rl co U] U) W \ p W a r1l W w CJS [® H O ®. W H w UW PPi Pi .11 USW MW UW J UI MPI UpwUNI \H o 0.D 7 Z C7H C7 ri W til W Ut UGx Z(o� ODUUUUUU Z.,U U %, O W O HUacn U] HHHHHHHH H\ Z H `,I, UIz U H`ti. `✓` yry �✓.ey °✓ EIS HUS 3 H O Rri p', a-1 U.2 0 M U1 H xl,'' W' R'� 0.'i 0.'i 4 P. p O C`3 UI H NPI U1 W U rGI-6 WOO HU! www Ww W W P4 ; w -1 O 0U) W H HW Ui QE p m PMMMUzMMW p H y 7 �1 w Ut Us W p C U) O c1 Gia H c4 W 4 Ul W U H Ri as H W 'N" w O U1 CN L4 H Qj H -i W W (n N OU) NN NQ O 0U1 H U W i O Orjl W 'JP; N U3 C7 r7 Ul ,�" U " , ??' 0-7 H 7(Pq"J Q1-1 00QQ UH ma l0 � U y a H 4m Cim 0u)u) UU W C9C7C7C9UC7U° 0� 0r 0H W 0 a+� 1 1H aU W W Off-, U�IpQ � HHHHHH�H+ U 0 x U " 2 W H PeH a Get 0 �1 N Ll KC KC UUUUUUU US H Ee U} 0.a +� 0o enH oWW ori o NIn o 0 off o C?{'' oo oW W W W W W W H � la, J � UJ w W QQ Q Q C7 Ua Ua U} Ua Ur [n rn N N N N H H N H r1 N H N N N 11 H rl H H H H H O In W m O O O O O Ul O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O d* CI O O O O O O o H O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d M H rI O O O O O M O M 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O dI lD �D O O O O 0 cPl O Va O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rl rl rl O O O O O r1 O ri O O O 0 0 00 0 0 0 lD I co I H I I In I M I Ln I W I M 1 dI 1 h 1 O 1 N I I lD I O I I I I I 1 I 11 C) hO NOO Ln W rlM WO W W Lr) OD Mrl MO OO 00d0 r1W HW W W W W W W 00 W O LONN MN MM 0 C N N I- C9 LDO MN tDM ri0o 0) Ell NNNCV CV NN1N E- 11 dl rl CR1MM OM NM W rl mm hM CD 1-4 evM OM ri H r1 rIM NMMMMMMM OM OM H MM ri N rl Cl OM ON ON Ori O N OM OMM c-iN 14NNN NNNN In U) Ln Lo N N Ln N N m N Ln V) Ln N N CV N N N CN N I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rl rl H rD O O M O O rl O IT W W O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 In Ifo dI In lI lD U1 1 Ln O H lS) I Lf) O 1-4 tla lf} 1 H IT Ln lD Id) O H O O O O d O I ri 1 H I rl I I ri I rl I rl I H I ri I rl I ra I '- i rl I I r1 I rl I I I I I I 1 \o \ O \ O d \ O \ O \ O \ 0 \ O --0 \ O \ O \ 0 0 --0 \ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1�1 t0 dI �o lD l0 tD dI LD di lD eN lD dI tD �o di ayl w 010 eM l0 tD <N w V W tD l0 lD l0 CD tD 01 O I O I I O 1 O I O I d I O I O I O I O I O I 1 01 O I I I I I I I \O \Ln \d0 1- 1-1 1- 1-1 \O \rl \rl 11 Ln -1 1-4 \r1 CD CD \H \H 1-4 'A rl HHrl H O rl O .-1 O O r1 (D rl 0 rl O ri O rl O H O ri O H O rl O O r1 O H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,--I H rl M H ri rl ri Ln rl U) rl 11 rl m i Ln rl m H 181 ri m rl r1 H H In H Ln Ill Ln u) Id) Lo Ln W Ln O O h O O O In O U, - O Ln a -i etl h W [' W h M O 00 01h 00 W 0 C:3 OLo 00 to VIM NO NOd Od000 r h M M M O 01 O W O O O rl L N • 'CDD 'm Lai 0 0 0 0 W • p . p p e,D tyl N N h a N . . . . . . . ^3i W Olf) NMM h O If) 0 C`•O rl LD Va dl W N N� (Dmm Nh r- Ln LOM N W h W cV dI H O W rl rl rl h ri Ln N h In r1 h V} cr W co N N h LD M M N <N Dl M Ln H h rl h rl N V� ri VT M M Vt ri V). ri Vk N Vt aft V} h V} W V} N V} lD V3- M 'A H H N M rl Ln tD C^ co m Cr rl N M M'.'M aLD r.... xO O O O O e -i H H .-i I , rl .-i I I m Ul IP} I.[) In I.C) Ln Ln Ln If1 0.A') Ln Lf) IPF C^ C• C` C... C- h h C'- h C"^ C.) CD O o O o 0 o O o o C.) CD rD'r o N N N N N N N N N N CN N N N rl H 1 11 rl e -i 1-1 1-1 r -i 1-1 .-1 H 1•4 ri) 1 0Y, 0 0 2 0 R C7 C7 Cl C7 0 0 0 U FI p H H H H I...{ u (n P4 F q 1 P F. i FI FM tl Cf) U) u) Cn W ri) ca ct) U) U) ut R F E-4 F CM F Ed F.1 P Ed F p �D �D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1. 1.,n In 1-1 I-dLI) o rl o (D cN 04 (Y) Id n 04 13, m KC (Do(1) W w mo L- o -P 1* c- (.- o Nu) �D �D M 1-1 c) "D m ri 0 I N N (1) m Q (N I V) a) I (n N (D a)H N In iD m Ln c1 o a U w Nm N (D -1 cD w (D (3) a,l, oo LD 1 0 N to a) Ln a) a) cD co H tlI cq 1-3 1-4 o n J N a) I-d tl C) clu m 0 0 C) H 0 u Ln 0 p LOG U1F., , u N OZ La 0 m z z 04 C) G4 E� 0 Ln a Ed N � 2 m U H �4 0 W 4 P4 EA P� 0 H �D ��, N 0 v) - 0 r4 0 U p H U H a 01 0 In Ln UGnirn 0 -i f4 Gd u H ul P 0 NF 1-1 1-4 c\7 NO MM 0 c, r� a�H F" 2 N H ID EP4 :D r- 0 z b a 0 ca U 0 N EA H N P4 NP ZO OF Q P4 P4 fl� Ed 10, H> NH H> ID 1) 10 �pi�: ZO I'd 12 W N 0M 1>4 HW H U C) W W � IH14 DH4 HN --v >a 0 V4 P� r4 0 r�, r4 M Ul MM 4 0 0u) U �D ;O �) W H I I H Ed 04 H I H U) M ul Ln z 0 cM H H H 0 P4 N r., El 14 r4 f4 0 0 F-4 W W W 0 0 cr, K4 P C) ru4l ON Qx z 0 u u u cq P4 u U 0 0 at eJ w H H 0 wl. Z 2 PI F�l Gra 1-4 0 0 o 0 Z Z cD c�P4 H o Ed off F., N N ()o o C/I co P, Ti) N F3 M > n, a 04 ril 000 M p P C9 � H r- M rn z -I p� CD -j N N Cq N N CN NN NN N N NN N NH " FC C I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I C) . .0. o C) a o C) 0 C) C) cD o o 0 o cD cD C) C) c) o o o c:) C) n c) 0 o 0 a 0 o c) C) C) o 0 C) o o c) (D o a 0 o o o cD o C) o o 00 o cD 0 o C) o o n n --I "D Ln m m m m In to w f-4 0 11 11 11 1 .1 1 .1 1 .1 No r0 11 1 .1 NN " 11 m .1 c-I .1 .1 11 .1 .1 .1 0 C\j . cq o , , , -A w . cN Ln r- m H r- Ln W C) W M Lf) o Cq C:� o r- -j 000 NN m 10 m eH cq cn M I-i cl) A Ln rq 011 m moo c1l m m -i I-i cq m 14 1-11-4 co m o li 1-1 1-1 I cli N cD rn cq (n -I (n o �O M H m 000 --1 m Ori r-IO o m o H o rn C) NN m Ed W 11 cq 04 u) N Lr) Ln LI) M Ln M N clQ Ln Lf) Id, Ln to Ln Ln Ln Ln ' Ln O Ln o o L, O o O cr - - - 0 0 oLn L Lr) '0 Ln 0 o In Ln 0 cq --1 Lr) w o H In 0 2 2 o m C) co M r) LLr) w) LI) Ed O c) Lr) �D C) w In -d In Ln d, 4LI) -I 'd, Lf) q LO o Ln w 'n Nf) -i -I 'd 'A 1 1 q I I I ri 1-4 1 -, I r, 1 -4 1 r, I I I o 0 o C) c) 10 1 . 1 1) 1 . I..o N w w '°D w w ev C) Q tlO dI cO H " N dI kD IT N 141 1-1 eO --I -A I-d C-�-, I c:l I C, I c�l 1 0 1 1 o I cl I c:l I cll:, I C, .1 o .1 o .1 .1 .1 I - . -1 . -1 . . I- . 11 . . 11 c:, 11 o HO c:, 0 n o c:, 0 o� 0 OO c -i o c:> c) -A -� -1 11 -1 C) o -1 1-1 2 1-1 -d I-d , 1-4-1 HO -I o o c) M Lr) 1-1 11 a) 1-1 1-4 'A 'A r-i 1-1 1-1 1-4 'A 1-1 1-4 'A 1-1 Id V. cq 2, C) c:, C) 0 0 cD o 0 c:� " cq 0 c:, m m C) c:) I-i -, o 0 00 cc) co C) Lf) cq n c o c L c- cN m C• lo oo I- c:, 0 C� cl c� I c� 0 c� cl o� w N c3 • o 'A .0 o • N c- 10 m c� ,� o. � CD. �� 4 c:) . cq . o C� cq C� ID . C� D �O . m -4+ oo w r- 00 o cq r- �D -I Id m w w cq Ino N cq co m r-I CON r� cq 1� oD 1� r� -1 Lf) m w cN co m [- I�d 1-4 OO r-I cD Ln in oo oo N N a) cy) cq r- -cN N w -4 CO o v)- I-d M- Lf) In. N N A- w cl v)- --I m vk j) W lj)- 'D v)- oD -A w lj)- rl) Ed I-q 0 O rd cq cl) .,p Lf) w L- clj m o I-d clq 11 ri Cq cq N. cq cq N N N N N n m rl) In Lr) I.n M Ln in Ln Ln Ln IS) Ln Ln I.n In C) c3 rD (D C) cD (D cD o (D �D c) �D cq N cN (,q N cq Cq N cq N 0 01 M H I 0 I 9 a� Z z z Z H E+ Ei r M CSA m 0 � O H ED H 0O Z a H i.n LC) H r...p H 1-4W 3k ... N Q Ln Ln H W W O a U (� W a m z u1 q to W O H U W O 0 WU U H w H H H H � H H H w O U N N N N U N N p'Q oo zoo woo N N H N N 0 c g c q WH j W Z W W W W W N W waH w U �v �� K4 L-1 9 �� zaa xaa �a,a W0W , x°00 N 0s-7 NN N NW N NN H H H c2>^��cna, �+Z>0 00 O ,,OZ,O00 Ln in C:)H ca f4 U WW W . �F7 gWgHNPPaH W >4 `Jwi 1'7 pD P4 04Z Wh04 PH, w WNo D ��.Cq Qaa Qaa Ha a WH a� H Wc7 H2v cnpi rWb�m uaH � pence z KC w2 Hww wr� �wa -lel aaw w a aww � H�n�n H�n�n H 7 C7 H za x0119a U w aHH aHH H 0H waa o H aUen�� lu>>Uu w W W CWS waW �� Ht�x Woo W®® P, a aww wcnw w a as a oil Cnaa saNN s�NN HR H H HH',L'U y+ 0HH00 R: OC.7Oz7-�"00 00 eaa UU U` N'J U Q �4 O µ U0u 00 e^ -'J "✓.'�- >> N N N N N N N N ri N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N H N H H H 11 i # i i. s # 4 • i i. i # # • # • i i # i # i # i# # # # #. i # i • # # • • # i i ! # i i i i # i. i 4 #. # # i # # i # # # i # ♦ i i # • i i # # • ♦ i. i i # •f # # i i i t1 i i i# i i #• •• i# i i i i # #• i i i i i i i# i i# ii i# i i i +! i i i i i i i• # 4: i i. #. i# i # # i i # i # i 4# i' i i ## i i#•# i# i i fY. i## i i# • i ii i i # i • i i•♦#• i# i! i ## i #. i i i i Ln Ch N 00 00 -1 tlL O0 MOL McD 001 dL N da N M CJ O O M 0l h M W O W NdID 0 L!) Vs Ll L!)0 L� r- ID ri I ® 11 r® a f d 0 f)C� ®00 w n r W Ql hOIQ • a ®Oa s a NN j DO d OC®TION N f) L, ® Q N N • ® ® . a e [d H a s r -d LDw 00 NO0111M NIf)Ln NN N W H Lnr MLn CD Nh rU)[—t11 M0)H w 0r- N co R1 N0)CV Nd�0) 4D0O 00 hMH c1 co N NMH ri NCNN 10,11-IMN MN10daNNMN Lnww NL16D m�oLn NM M L®O dLa 01 MH HO1N r-mr- ^IZP H H vi- r- H W v) v} w x!k N N M M M M M Ln L[1 LO m Lf) I..,. Com. I` C'- h CS CF 0 O C) y N N N N 0 0 0 Ln C� IN H H z H z H z H �40 N. 1-1 cq L� L- to 00 1-1 N V)� I -i rim cq N 0) '1 m El- r- I -i 'A U)- cq .0 m U' U) e a en Ua U) El Eq F� El El E� �D �D n ID �D 0 0�D 0 0 0 0 co (f)H L() H H 0 1-4 Ln I G N c to Q� F4 C14 (N In H C) I H In I.n Ln 1-1 C) a) oI CD CD C CD H �o N 1 CN (N N (N I N I N p cH --I cq tlp a) CD to 0 0 H H --i I -q r.... r- CD 0 4t- cq CIA C) a) CYN -4 cq Ea U1 C, lyCD Ei cf) 0 C, 0 q 14 44 E-1 NO U Z Iq N �D 14 H H H 0 0 W W F4 H "' UH 6 6 'Q N W4 N Pq F4 'r - M o ux U) P� oz C-) P� z 1 P4 �> OM sewn U) F14 90 >1 0 0 0 p �q 0 F -I W P4 rq r -I W �'4 M CD CD 0 p H u 00 1-1 0 CD H W Cd 0 0 C) P4 04 H> > H �it H> Q2 m D4 H 14 H C� CD 0 X OW oW 0W C:) OWW m U U) cq N cq C) 00 (D 0 C) CD a CD CD (n rn m 0 C) 0 C) �o C) CD 0 0 C) (D 11 C, C:) I I C=, I C() I co I C', I m I r- 00 CD CD NN 11.4 M m C) mo -10 0 CD c- a 000 r- C) (n C) :0.1 cq --I 'A C) �o 010 m " m 1-4 NO ,-I re) m (D m C) m CD m 01-4 0 m E -i p p Ln Lf) Ln Ln Ln 0 0 0 is is 1-4 00 r -I In rl) m In -;I, In at Ln Ln cn In cq \00 C) o 'o In m m In d1 Ln dl U) " In M In cq 0 1 1 CD I CD I CD I C) 1 01 lww \ Ln , Ln \ Lf) --0 \o r- CD C) CD 1-1 0 C) 1-1 0 1-10 1-1 C3 1-4 a I -i C, w ,A C,4 Cq -1 0) -1 m ri aN A -4 1-1 'A 'A ul m C) �4 1-4 mm N 'n w C) Ln0 (D 0 0 U a� C� Ln C� IN oll �v C� 1-1 N Co. m co N 'A N. 1-1 cq L� L- to 00 1-1 N V)� I -i rim cq N 0) '1 m El- r- I -i 'A U)- cq .0 m il- m vi Wz P I C/I m U) Cl) co (f)H H H 0 G Q� F4 0 W In I.n Ln LO H 0 #1 - CD CD C CD CD El 1 CN (N N (N C13 CN 0 E+ N p 0 0 4t- 0 1 0 ITEM NO. 2- /,r,/%' STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers 'Hoc�� FROM: Terry Shea, Interim Director of Finance DATE: November 18 2015 SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT SEPTEMBER 2015 SUMMARY Attached is the Treasurer's Report for the months of September 2015. The Treasurer's Report lists all cash for the City (which includes the Baldwin Park Financing Authority), the Housing Authority, and the Successor Agency to the Community Development Commission (CDC). All investments are in compliance with the City's Investment Policy and the California Government Code. FISCAL IMPACT None LEGAL REVIEW None required. Rl'1,' 0M:➢" F,NDATION Staff recommends that Council receive and file the Treasurer's Report for September 2015. BACKGROUND The City's Investment Policy requires the Treasurer's Report be submitted to the Mayor and City Council on a monthly basis. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK TREASURER'S REPORT 9/30/2015 Schedule of Cash and Investments includes all financial assets as included in the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. There was no investment maturity/purchase transaction made for the month of September 2015 and several deposits/withdrawals were made with the Local Agency Investment Fund. In compliance with the California Government Code Section 53646 et seq., I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the City's expenditure requirements for the next six months that all investments are in compliance to the City's Statement of Investment Policy. Approved by: Ter ry Shea Interim Director of Mnance .P.__..... . ESTIMATED] NT INTEREST� URCHASE MATURITY PAR CURRENT BOOK MARKET DESCRIPTION RATE DATE DATE VALUE PRINCIPAL,VALUE VALUE State of California Local Agency Investment Fund City 0.34% Varies Varies 25,144,287.50 25,144,287.50 25,144,287.50 25,144,287.50 Housing Authority 0.34% Varies Varies 13,073.35 13,073.35 13,073.35 13,073.35 25,157,360.85 25,157,360.85 25,157,360.8mm 5 25,157,360.85 Fiscal Agent Funds - City Varies Varies Varies 2,448,628.92 2,448,628.92 2,448,628.92 2,448,628.92 Fiscal Agent Funds - Successc Varies Varies Varies 2,938,099.18 2,938,099.18 2,938,099.18 2,938,099.18 30„544„088 96 $ 30 644 088.95 5,386,728.10 $ 30,544,088 95 Total Investments $ 30,544,088.95 Cash City Checking 6,305,131.58 City Miscellaneous Cash 478,935.75 Comm. Develop. Comm. 0.00 Successor Agency 4,005,102.00 Housing Authority 96,193.40 Financing Authority Ow00 Total Cash 10885L3GZ.73IT„ Total Cash and Investments $ 41,429,451.68 Schedule of Cash and Investments includes all financial assets as included in the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. There was no investment maturity/purchase transaction made for the month of September 2015 and several deposits/withdrawals were made with the Local Agency Investment Fund. In compliance with the California Government Code Section 53646 et seq., I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the City's expenditure requirements for the next six months that all investments are in compliance to the City's Statement of Investment Policy. Approved by: Ter ry Shea Interim Director of Mnance ITEM NO. STAFF REPORT ALD TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Shama P. Curian, Human Resources Manager r4is sia�� DATE: November 18, 2015 SUBJECT: Claim Rejection SUMMARY This report requests the City Council reject the Claims for Damages to person or property received for filing against the City of Baldwin Park. FISCAL IMPACT Unknown at this time. RECO "IG"ylENDA"1"lON Staff recommends City Council reject the following claims and direct staff to send the appropriate notice of rejection to claimants: Karla Solis Pena Claimant alleges being rear-ended by City employee Caren Vargas -Soto Claimant alleges impound of vehicle Edgar Olvera Claimant alleges being rear-ended by City employee This government claim, and all government claims, should be considered as potential lawsuits in the future. Thus, it is requested that all City Staff, the Mayor and all Councilmembers refrain from making any statements, whether public or private in nature. It is important that no statements be made so as to not prejudice this claim in any way which can happen if public or private comments are made about this claim by City staff or Councilmembers. LEGAL REVIEW Any specific questions should be referred to the City Attorney. BACKGROUND In order for the statute of limitations to begin on the claims received, it is necessary for the City Council to reject the claims by order of motion and that the claimants are sent written notification of said action. ALTERNATIVES None. MINUTES BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL iiT M NO. STUDY SESSION AND SPECIAL MEETiN MARCH 7, 2012, 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBER -14403 E. Pacific Avenue, Baldwin Park, 91706 CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Lozano. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Councilmember Ricardo Pacheco Councilmember Marlen Garcia Councilmember Monica Garcia Mayor Pro Tem Susan Rubio Mayor Manuel Lozano PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Mayor Lozano opened Public Communications. Seeing no one wishing to speak, Public Communications were closed. OPEN SESSION There being no items for consideration in Open Session, the meeting recessed to Closed Session. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION 1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATIONS Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6: &q desk r ate i re reser tatives: Vijay Singhal, Chief Executive Officer and other o I� nr to e Or aniz,tesignated representatives as d „y�_ rr:: SEIU; Clerical; Professional and Technical Employees; Police Management Employees; Confidential Employees; Confidential Management and Baldwin Park Police Officer's Association; Unrepresented employees; and part-time employees 2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (GC 54956.8) Properties: APN 8413-014-900 8460-005-900 Commission Negotiators: Vijay Singhal & Joseph Pannone Negotiating Parties: D. C. Corporation Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment 3. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (GC 54956.8) Properties: Situs APN 8555-017-013 8555-017-021 8555-017-026 8555-018-002 8555-018-003 Commission Negotiators: Negotiating Parties: Under Negotiation: Owner Address Meruelo Baldwin Park, LLC 13904 Corak St. Meruelo Baldwin Park, LLC 13853 Garvey Ave. Meruelo Baldwin Park, LLC 3060 Feather Ave. Meruelo Baldwin Park, LLC 13822 Garvey Ave.. Meruelo Baldwin Park, LLC 13916 Garvey Ave. Vijay Singhal & Joseph Pannone Meruelo Baldwin Park LLC and Kaiser Permanente Price and terms of payment Page 1 of 2 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. ATTEST:. City Clerk APPROVED; Mayor Page 2 of 2 MINUTES BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MARCH 7, 2012, 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBER - 14403 E. Pacific Avenue, Baldwin Park, 91706 These minutes are presented in Agenda order. Various announcements or discussions may have occurred before or after the title under which they are presented. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Lozano at 7:03 p.m. INVOCATION The invocation was provided by Pastor Jackson. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Lozano, ROLL CALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Council Member Ricardo Pacheco Council Member Marlen Garcia Council Member Monica Garcia Mayor Pro Tem Susan Rubio Mayor Manuel Lozano ANNOUNCEMENTS Mayor Lozano asked that the meeting be closed in memory of former Baldwin Park employee Larry Dominguez, who is survived by his wife and two daughters; extended condolences to the family. Mayor Lozano also remembered Raul Sanchez Solis, who passed recently, and extended condolences and thoughts to the family. PROCLAMATIONS COMIMENDATIONS PRESENTATIONS Presentation by Waste Management on the new CNG Fueling Station and programs available to Baldwin Park residents Carolyn Anderson -Carrillo and Terri Muse, representing Waste Management, narrated a PowerPoint to show the new CNG Fueling Stations and the programs available to Baldwin Park residents. Councilmember Pacheco introduced Brittany Maldonado, one of the young ladies competing to become the Pageant Queen for St. John the Baptist Church. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Mayor Lozano opened Public Communications at 7:25 p.m. and noted that each speaker is permitted a total of three (3) minutes to speak. Mark Flores, Baldwin Park resident, noted that he recently found that Kaiser has a program "take back" program for old and unused prescription drugs. announced that there are still spots available for the upcoming fund raiser golf tournament to benefit the Flores Music Scholarship Fund. Susan Rimes, representing Senator Hernandez's office, announced that there will be a Job Fair coming up in Irwindale; encouraged those looking for employment or a career change to attend. I -Anda Noriega, Manager of Valley County Water District, came to introduce herself and noted that she was recently appointed as manager and she looks forward to working with the City. Sri Khu, CEO for MAPS 4 College, made a brief presentation regarding their program and the award of CDBG funds to their non-profit organization; expressed appreciation for the opportunity to open their office in Baldwin Park where they have been able to expand and succeed; noted that their efforts have been rewarded with 45 students heading to college this year. a�Ilowfield, Action Food Pantry, also seeking consideration for CDBG funds, narrated a summary of the many accomplishments of their organization; sought Council support so that they can continue to provide food baskets to those in need in Baldwin Park. Joselyne, MAPS 4 College participant, spoke in support for granting CDBG funds to the program; noted that it has helped her reach her academic goals and she feels confident in her next step of enrolling in college. Thomas Kerri, former Baldwin Park resident, commented on the proposed parking structure project adjacent to City Hall; expressed his objection to the excessive noise early in the morning, especially the train that blows its horn as it comes through town. i11 Root, President of the Baldwin Park Police Officers Association, commented on rumors that BPPOA is using proxy in voting, noting that the rumor is untrue. Sean Mese, Baldwin Park resident and student, spoke of the upcoming Congressional Youth Leadership Conference that he will be attending; spoke of some of the points that will be covered at the conference and noted that he is still raising funds for the trip. Seeing no others wishing to speak, Public Communications closed at 7:43 p.m. Councilmember Pacheco provided a brief update on the State of the State that he recently attended; noted that Daylight Savings time will be coming up. Mayor Pro Tem Rubio asked that members from the Valley County Water District collaborate with the City regarding upcoming road improvement projects and how the two agencies might coordinate the work so that there is not duplication of road disruptions. CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor Pro Tem Rubio noted that she wished to pull Item Nos. 6 and 8 for further discussion. 1. - WARRANTS AND DEMANDS Staff recommends City Council ratify the attached Warrants and Demands Register. A motion was made by Lozano, seconded by Garcia, and carried (5 — 0) to ratify the Warrants and Demands Register, AYES: Garcia, Garcia, Lozano, Pacheco, Rubio NOES: None. Page 2 of 10 2. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. CLAIMS REJECTION Staff recommends that Council reject the claim of Carlos Miranda and direct staff to send the appropriate notice of rejection to claimant. A motion was made by Lozano, seconded by Garcia, and carried (5 — 0) to reject the claim of Carlos Miranda and direct staff to send the appropriate notice of rejection to claimant. AYES: Garcia, Garcia, Lozano, Pacheco, Rubio NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 3. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE 1349; ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 10.19 OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY FOR MONEY OR DAMAGES Staff recommends the City Council waive further reading, read by title only and, adopt on second reading Ordinance No. 1349 entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING SECTION 10.19 OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO CLAIMS FOR MONEY OR DAMAGES.". A motion was made by Lozano, seconded by Garcia, and carried (5 — 0) to approve the preparation and presentation of the plaques and proclamation as outlined in the staff report "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING SECTION 10.19 OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO CLAIMS FOR MONEY OR DAMAGES." AYES: Garcia, Garcia, Lozano, Pacheco, Rubio NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 4. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE 1350; ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 35.108 D OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE PROHIBITING CLASS CLAIMS FOR REFUNDS OF UTILITY USER TAXES Staff recommends the City Council read by title only and adopt on second reading, Ordinance No. 1350 entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING SUBSECTION 35.108 D OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO CLASS CLAIMS AND REFUNDS OF THE UTILITY USERS TAX." A motion was made by Lozano, seconded by Garcia, and carried (5 — 0) to approve and adopt Ordinance No. 1350, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING SUBSECTION 35.108 D OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO CLASS CLAIMS AND REFUNDS OF THE UTILITY USERS TAX." AYES: Garcia, Garcia, Lozano, Pacheco, Rubio NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. Page 3 of 10 5. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK'S COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2011 Staff recommends the City Council receive and file the City of Baldwin Park's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011. A motion was made by Lozano, seconded by Garcia, and carried (5 — 0) to receive and file the City of Baldwin Park's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011. AYES: Garcia, Garcia, Lozano, Pacheco, Rubio NOES: None. ABSENT: None, ABSTAIN: None. 6. AUTHORIZE A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR THE 4T" OF JULY FIREWORKS CELEBRATION Staff recommends the City Council authorize advertising the RFP for professional pyrotechnic services related to the 4 1 of July Fireworks Celebration. Mayor Pro Tem Rubio suggested that the City consider additional ways to reduce the cost of this event, either by eliminating the band or eliminating the pyrotechnics; stated that she does not object to holding the event but would like staff to try a little harder to cut some costs. A motion was made by Garcia, seconded by Garcia, and carried (5 — 0) to authorize advertising the RFP for professional pyrotechnic services related to the 4th of July Fireworks Celebration. AYES: Garcia, Garcia, Lozano, Pacheco, Rubio NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 7. AWARD A CONTRACT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF HILDA SOLIS PARK PLAYGROUND RENOVATION TO CREATIVE NILE BUILDERS, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $96,000 Staff recommends the City Council 1) award a Construction Contract to Creative Nile Builders, Inc. in the amount of $96,000; and 2) authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement; and 3) authorize the Director of Public Works to execute any necessary change orders in an amount not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the original contract. A motion was made by Lozano, seconded by Garcia, and carried (5 — 0) to 1) award a Construction Contract to Creative Nile Builders, Inc. in the amount of $96,000; and 2) authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement; and 3) authorize the Director of Public Works to execute any necessary change orders in an amount not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the original contract. AYES: Garcia, Garcia, Lozano, Pacheco, Rubio NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. Page 4 of 10 8. AWARD A CONTRACT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BALDWIN PARK TRANSIT CENTER TO PCL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES INC. Staff recommends City Council 1) Approve the award of construction contract to PCL Construction Services Inc. in the amount of $8,631,300; 2) Authorize the Mayor to fully execute it after the a review by our City Attorney and after it has been executed by the contractor; 3) Authorize the Finance Director to appropriate $1,889,900 (difference between $2,500,00 less $610,100 for Verizon Land) from the unallocated fund balance in Proposition C for FY 2011-2012 and to carry forward any remaining balance not spent to the FY 2012-2013 budget for this project; 4) Authorize the Finance Director to appropriate $1,200,000 from the unallocated fund balance in gas Tax for FY 2011-2012 and to carry forward any remaining balance not spent to the FY 2012-2013 budget for this project; 5) Authorize the Finance Director to appropriate $425,500 from the unallocated fund balance in Measure R for FY 2011-2012 and to carry forward any remaining balance not spent to the FY 2012-2013 budget for this project; and 6) Authorize the CEO and the Public Works Director to negotiate on behalf of the City the cost of project alternates and bring back to the City Council a recommendation to award a package of alternates along with the funding options to cover those costs. Mayor Pro Tem Rubio began discussion on this item by asking for clarification; noted that the funding is time sensitive and asked whether there was an alternate plans to ensure construction is not delayed; also requested that, if any additive alternates are exercised, the additional parking stalls be given priority. Discussion ensued and Councilmembers expressed concern regarding sustainability of funds and determination of which elements may be taken for priority later in the project. A motion was made by Garcia, seconded by Garcia, and carried (5 — 0) to 1) Approve the award of construction contract to PCL Construction Services Inc. in the amount of $8,631,300; 2) Authorize the Mayor to fully execute it after the a review by our City Attorney and after it has been executed by the contractor; 3) Authorize the Finance Director to appropriate $1,889,900 (difference between $2,500,00 less $610,100 for Verizon Land) from the unallocated fund balance in Proposition C for FY 2011-2012 and to carry forward any remaining balance not spent to the FY 2012-2013 budget for this project; 4) Authorize the Finance Director to appropriate $1,200,000 from the unallocated fund balance in gas Tax for FY 2011-2012 and to carry forward any remaining balance not spent to the FY 2012-2013 budget for this project; 5) Authorize the Finance Director to appropriate $425,500 from the unallocated fund balance in Measure R for FY 2011-2012 and to carry forward any remaining balance not spent to the FY 2012- 2013 budget for this project; and 6) Authorize the CEO and the Public Works Director to negotiate on behalf of the City the cost of project alternates and bring back to the City Council a recommendation to award a package of alternates along with the funding options to cover those costs. AYES: Garcia, Garcia, Lozano, Pacheco, Rubio NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. Page 5 of 10 PUBLIC HEARING 9. PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN AND CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN Staff recommends that City Council open the public hearing and following the public hearing approve the allocations for the FY 2012-2013 CDBG public service programs by selecting one of the following options: OPTION 1 - Approve the Joint Commission's recommendations for funding; OPTION 2 - Approve the 22% Across the Board reduction; or OPTION 3 - Revise allocations as the City Council deems appropriate. Housing Manager Suzie Ruelas narrated a summary of the purpose of the action plan and how the funds would be presented for determination. Noted that Council may selected from the options available or provide direction to staff accordingly. Mayor opened the Public Hearing at 8:01 p.m. and invited those wishing to speak to step forward. A representative from California Mental Health Connection came forward and spoke regarding the mental health program that recently relocated to Baldwin Park and is seeking funding for a shelter for specific types of individuals. Sophia Lopez, representing Project Sister -Family Services, provided a brief overview of the various outreach services they provide, such as Internet Safety training for children ages 9 — 18, Good Touch -Bad Touch to children ages 5 — 9 and other protective education. Connie Brimm, of the East San Gabriel Valley Coalition for the homeless, narrated the proposal previously submitted for CDBG funding consideration; described some of the programs that are provided to those who have been displaced. Pastor Flores, representing Church of the Redeemer, spoke of the food assistance program that the Church offers and other programs that assist those in need. A representative (unable to determine program) spoke of many of the programs and types of cases that his organization handles; noted that they have a great number of referrals to classes that are held and spoke of the successes; requested that funding continue so that they can continue to provide the classes and counseling services. Dr. Jimenez, California Mental Health Connection, expressed concern regarding the reduction of funding for some of the organizations. A Commissioner from the Housing Commission spoke of how the commission evaluated the various organizations and the basic criteria necessary to make a determination of those who are included in the suggested option (Option 1). Seeing no others wishing to speak, the Mayor closed the Public Hearing at 8:21 p.m. Mayor Pro Tem Rubio opened discussion by saying that she was present at the hearings and she supports Option 1; noted that there are certain mandates that must be followed when making determination of selection. Further discussion ensued regarding the recommendations that were developed by the Commission and by the Executive Team, noting that there were some differences in the two recommendations. Page 6 of 10 A motion was made by Pacheco, seconded by Rubio, to approve the Commission Recommendation as presented. Garcia voiced objection. Mayor Lozano directed the City Clerk to take the vote by roll call: AYES: Pacheco, Rubio NOES: Garcia, Garcia, Lozano. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. The motion failed by a vote of 2-3. Council reviewed all of the programs to make a determination of how CDBG funding would be allocated. The CDBG designations were decided as follows: Action Food Bank Council agreed to accept the Commission Recommendation to allocate $0 to Action Food Bank. BPPD Pride Platoon A motion was made by Garcia, seconded by Garcia, to grant $18,000 to BPPD Pride Platoon. Pacheco voiced objection. Mayor Lozano directed the City Clerk to take the vote by roll call: AYES: Garcia, Garcia, Lozano, Rubio NOES: Pacheco. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. A motion was made by Garcia, seconded by Garcia, and carried (4 — 1; Pacheco voting No) to grant $18,000 to BPPD Pride Platoon. California Mental Idealth. Connection A motion was made by Lozano, seconded by Rubio, and carried (5 — 0) to reallocate $1,000 from Project Sister to the California Mental Health Connection. AYES: Garcia, Garcia, Lozano, Pacheco, Rubio NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. Childcare Subsite A motion was made by Garcia, seconded by Rubio, and carried (5 — 0) to accept the Commission Recommendation to allocate $7,500 to Childcare Subsidy AYES: Garcia, Garcia, Lozano, Pacheco, Rubio NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. Church of the Redeemer Food Bank A motion was made by Lozano, seconded by Garcia, and carried (5 — 0) to accept the Commission Recommendation to allocate $10,000 to Church of the Redeemer Food Bank. AYES: Garcia, Garcia, Lozano, Pacheco, Rubio NOES: None. Page 7 of 10 ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. Domestic Violence Advocate A motion was made by Lozano, seconded by Rubio, and carried (5 — 0) to accept the Commission Recommendation to allocate $14,000 to Domestic Violence Advocate. AYES: Garcia, Garcia, Lozano, Rubio NOES: Pacheco, ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. ESGV Coalition for the Homeless A motion was made by Lozano, seconded by Garcia, and carried (5 — 0) to accept the Commission Recommendation to allocate $10,000 to ESGV Coalition for the Homeless. AYES: Garcia, Garcia, Lozano, Pacheco, Rubio NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. Famil w ery ce Center A motion was made by Lozano, seconded by Garcia, and carried (5 — 0) to accept the Commission Recommendation to allocate $30,000 to Family Service Center. AYES: Garcia, Garcia, Lozano, Pacheco, Rubio NOES: None. ABSENT: None, ABSTAIN: None. Graffiti Removal A motion was made by Lozano, seconded by Garcia, and carried (5 — 0) to accept the Commission Recommendation to allocate $33,469 to Graffiti Removal. AYES: Garcia, Garcia, NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. Lozano, Pacheco, Rubio )MAPS for Colle g A motion was made by Garcia, seconded by Garcia, to reallocate $1,000 from St. Johns Church Social Services to MAPS for College. Councilmembers Pacheco and Rubio voiced objection. Mayor Lozano directed the City Clerk to take the vote by roll call: AYES: Garcia, Garcia, Lozano NOES: Pacheco, Rubio. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. A motion was made by Garcia, seconded by Garcia, and carried (3 — 2; Pacheco and Rubio voted No) to reallocate $1,000 from St. Johns Church Social Services to MAPS for College. Page 8 of 10 Pro' ct SNster Council agreed that Project Sister be reduced and receive an allocation of $3,000. Recreation/Sorts Scholars A motion was made by Garcia, and no objections were noted to accept the Commission Recommendation to allocate $15,000 to Graffiti Removal. Santa Anita Family Services Council agreed to accept the Commission Recommendation and allocate $3,500 to Santa Anita Family Services. Social Model Recover S tem�n, Council agreed to accept the Commission Recommendation and allocate $0 to Social Model Recovery Systems, Inc. ?t. Johns Church Social Services A motion was made by Pacheco, seconded by Rubio, to reallocate $1,000 from Recreation/Sports Scholarship to St. Johns Church Social Services to restore the allocation to $3,250. Garcia voiced objection. Mayor Lozano directed the City Clerk to take the vote by roll call: AYES: Pacheco, Rubio NOES: Garcia, Garcia, Lozano. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. The motion failed by a vote of 3 - 2. St. Johns Church Social Services was allocated $2,350. 'youth EqjptgMipnt A motion was made by Lozano, seconded by Garcia, and carried (5 — 0) to accept the Commission Recommendation and allocate $8,000 to Youth Employment AYES: Garcia, Garcia, Lozano, Pacheco, Rubio NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. REPORTS OF OFFICERS 10. UPDATE ON THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO CHAPTERS 152 (SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE) AND 153 (ZONING ORDINANCE), ESTABLISHMENT OF NEW CITY-WIDE DESIGN GUIDELINES AND LANDSCAPE DESIGN MANUAL AND AMENDMENTS TO THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE POLICY MAP AND ZONING MAP (LOCATION: CITYWIDE; CASE NUMBER: AGP-115, Z-553, AZC-163 AND DRG 11-1) Staff recommends the City Council identify a date for the study session with the Planning Commission regarding the proposed comprehensive Zoning Code Update. Council came to agreement and scheduled the Study Session for March 28, 2012 at 6:30 p.m. Page 9 of 10 CITY COUNCIL i CITY CLERIC P CITY TREASURER 1 STAFF REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS Request by Councilmember Marlen Garcia for discussion on the following: • Send a letter, on behalf of the City Council, to adjacent cities asking for their support and partnership in applying for a Caltrans Environmental Justice Planning Grant proposal to create a multi -city bicycle master plan for the San Gabriel Valley. Councilmember Garcia provided a narrative to explain the vision for the multi -city bicycle master plan and how collaboration among neighboring cities would create a partnership through with grant funds could be requested from CalTrans; noted that she had drafted a letter that she would like to send to these fellow agencies seeking their cooperation and commitment to the group. • Request to establish a policy where any new streets built in Baldwin Park be considered being named after a fallen soldier. The city council would make a decision on the name. Councilmember Garcia introduced the idea of naming new streets after a fallen soldier; asked staff to develop a report and bring it back to Council for further consideration. Councilmember Garcia also provided a brief report on her recent attendance at the League of California Cities; also noted that the City of Ontario is working towards taking control of its airport and would appreciate letters of support from surrounding cities and agencies. ADJOURNMENT There being no other business to discuss, and all other matters having been addressed, a motion was made by Lozano, seconded by Garcia, to adjourn the meeting at 9:20 p.m. Mayor ATTEST: Manuel Lozano, Mayor Alejandra Avila, City Clerk APPROVED: Page 10 of 10 MINUTES BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL IITT M NO. STUDY SESSION AND SPECIAL MEETfN MARCH 21, 2012, 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBER - 14403 E. Pacific Avenue, Baldwin Park, 91706 CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Lozano. ROLL CALL CITY COUNCIL PRESENT' Councilmember Ricardo Pacheco Councilmember Marlen Garcia Councilmember Monica Garcia Mayor Pro Tem Susan Rubio Mayor Manuel Lozano PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Mayor Lozano opened Public Communications. Seeing no one wishing to speak, Public Communications was closed. OPEN SESSION CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATIONS Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6: Aent' N�r� rerc s wtatnves: Vijay Singhal, Chief Executive Officer and other representatives as designated EMpjpyee err a atuogm : SEIU; Clerical; Professional and Technical Employees; Police Management Employees; Confidential Employees; Confidential Management and Baldwin Park Police Officer's Association; Unrepresented employees; and part-time employees 2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (GC 54956.8) Properties: APN 8413-014-900 8460-005-900 Commission Negotiators: Vijay Singhal & Joseph Pannone Negotiating Parties: D. C. Corporation Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment 3. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (GC 54956.8) Properties: Situs APN 8555-017-013 8555-017-021 8555-017-026 8555-018-002 8555-018-003 Commission Negotiators: Negotiating Parties: Under Negotiation: Owner Address Meruelo Baldwin Park, LLC 13904 Corak St. Meruelo Baldwin Park, LLC 13853 Garvey Ave, Meruelo Baldwin Park, LLC 3060 Feather Ave. Meruelo Baldwin Park, LLC 13822 Garvey Ave, Meruelo Baldwin Park, LLC 13916 Garvey Ave, Vijay Singhal & Joseph Pannone Meruelo Baldwin Park LLC and Kaiser Permanente Price and terms of payment Page 1 of 2 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED: Mayor Page 2 of 2 MINUTES BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL REGULAR hntt WING - MARCH 21, 2012, 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBER - 14403 E. Pacific Avenue, Baldwin Park, 91706 These minutes are presented in Agenda order. Various announcements or discussions may have occurred before or after the title under which they are presented. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Lozano at 7:04 p.m. INVOCATION The invocation was provided by Pastor Jackson. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Lozano. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Council Member Ricardo Pacheco Council Member Marlen Garcia Council Member Monica Garcia Mayor Pro Tem Susan Rubio Mayor Manuel Lozano ANNOUNCEMENTS Mayor Lozano announced, as required by Government Code section 54954.3, that members of the City Council are also members of the Board of Directors of the Housing Authority and Finance Authority, which are concurrently convening with the City Council this evening and each Council Member is paid an additional stipend of $30 for attending the Housing Authority meeting and $50 for attending the Finance Authority meeting. Mayor Pro Tem Rubio invited the community to attend the Baldwin Park Transit Center Ground Breaking on Saturday, March 24, 2012, at 11:00 a.m.; also invited youth to attend the Teen Summit at the Senior Center. Councilmember Garcia asked that the meeting be closed in memory of Irene Portillo, Director of Project Amiga, and member of the community who supported many charitable programs. Mayor Pro Tem Rubio also announced a CycleTopia ride that will be also be held on Saturday at 10:00 a.m. Councilmember Garcia also commented on the Baldwin Park Bicycle Master Plan; reported that she attended council meetings of other neighboring cities at which a San Gabriel Valley Master Bicycle Plan was approved which will link all of the communities together. Councilmember Pacheco announced that there are several open positions with the City and details can be found on the City's website. PROCLAMATIONS COMMENDATIONS & PRESENTATIONS • Certificate of Recognition to the "What Adult Education Means to Me" essay contest Winners and School Instructors. Mayor Lozano presented Certificates of Recognition to each of the essay winners: Florencio Perez, Blanca Baldwin, Repuccio Savala, Cynthia Garrola, Nancy Mallotra, Debra Jensen, Phillipe Barroso, Josephina Thompson, Miguel Balasan, Larry Guajajara, Nancy Cantonia, Linda Rodriguez, Bonnie Rooney • Certificate of Recognition to Mariana Lake for receiving the "Women of Distinction Award", an award presented by Congress Member Judy Chu Mayor Lozano presented a Certificate of Recognition to Mariana Lake in honor of her receiving the "Women of Distinction Award" from Congresswoman Judy Chu. Mayor Lozano presented certificates of recognition to Sierra Vista students Maricela Fierro and Evelyn Avila, the first two female wrestlers to compete and place at the state level; Ms. Fierro planed as 7th best female wrestler and Ms. Avila placed as 6°h' best female wrestler, in their weight class, respectively, in the state of California. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Mayor Lozano opened Public Communications at 7:29 p.m. and noted that each speaker is permitted a total of three (3) minutes to speak. Maureen Popes, Baldwin Park resident, inquired about why school board meetings are being held at the council meetings; pointed out that there are 5 police officers on duty during the day and 5 officers at night, and asked how so few officers are supposed to patrol the city. regTuttle, Baldwin Park business owner, noted that recent comments made regarding support for the Police Chief and the Police Officer's Association were not made by him and are not his opinion; commented on the parking garage being proposed for a site adjacent to City Hall and how the garage will not provide any kind of relief. Unidentifi dSpeaker, commented on the parking structure and inquired as to whether the funds are actually available for the construction; inquired as to whether the structure would be built without increasing taxes for residents. Juan Rios, Baldwin Park resident, asked about when lights would be installed at Walnut Creek Nature Park; also commented on the sprinkler system which has been inoperable for more than a year. Ken Woods, Baldwin Park resident, thanked staff for installation of the turn (traffic) signal. Ma da Torrella, Baldwin Park resident, commented on how many people lost their homes with the economic downturn and how that affects taxes and the local economy; pointed out that everyone complains about the police staff being cut but that there are other departments where staffing cuts are taking place and the reduction is across the board. Ted Conturas, store manager of the local Walgreen's, announced that Walgreen's will be providing free health screenings to community members of all ages on Saturday, March 24, 2015. Seeing no others wishing to speak, Public Communications closed at 7:42 p.m. Mayor Lozano clarified that the parking structure is being constructed using Grant Funds, not monies from the General Fund; it was noted that funding sources include Prop C, MTA, and Asset Forfeiture funds. Page 2 of 7 CONSENT CALENDAR Item No. 5 was pulled from Consent for further discussion. WARRANTS AND DEMANDS Staff recommends City Council ratify the attached Warrants and Demands Register. A motion was made by Lozano, seconded by Garcia, and carried (5 — 0) to ratify the Warrants and Demands Register. AYES: Garcia, Garcia, Lozano, Pacheco, Rubio NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 2. MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT: JANUARY 2012 Staff recommends that Council receive and file the monthly financial report for the period ending January 2012 A motion was made by Lozano, seconded by Garcia, and carried (5 — 0) to receive and file the monthly financial report for the period ending January 2012. AYES: Garcia, Garcia, Lozano, Pacheco, Rubio NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 3. FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 MID -YEAR REPORT, AS OF JANUARY 2012 Staff recommends City Council review the Mid -year analysis/information, and approve the mid -year revenue and expenditure estimates or provide other direction to staff. A motion was made by Lozano, seconded by Garcia, and carried (5 — 0) to approve the 2011-2012 Mid -Year Report of revenue and expenditure estimates. AYES: Garcia, Garcia, Lozano, Pacheco, Rubio NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 4. PROPOSED RECOGNITIONS BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Staff recommends the City Council approve the preparation and presentation of the plaques and proclamation as outlined in the staff report. A , motion was made by Lozano, seconded by Garcia, and carried (5 — 0) to approve the preparation and presentation of the plaques and proclamation as outlined in the staff report. AYES: Garcia, Garcia, Lozano, Pacheco, Rubio NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 5. ADVISEMENT OF MAYOR'S APPOINTMENT TO THE OVERSIGHT BOARD FOR THE DISSOLVED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AND DIRECTION TO THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER FOR INTERIM STAFFING AND SUPPORT OF THE OVERSIGHT BOARD Staff recommends the City Council receive and file this report and concur with the interim staff direction discussed in the report. Page 3 of 7 Councilmember Pacheco requested that staff provide clarification to the public as to what this item means and what approve does. The City Attorney provided a brief explanation, giving some of the history of how the Community Development Commission came about and what changes occurred at the State level that resulted in the dissolving of the Commission. A motion was made by Pacheco, seconded by Lozano, and carried (5 — 0) to receive and file this report and concur with the interim staff direction discussed in the report. AYES: Garcia, Garcia, Lozano, Pacheco, Rubio NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 6. APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 2012-013 AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (Caltrans) UPON RECEIPT OF A TRANSPORTATION PLANNING GRANT (MULTI -CITY SAN GABRIEL VALLEY BICYCLE MASTER PLAN) Staff recommends the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2012-013, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AUTHORIZING STAFF TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION UPON RECEIPT OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE PLANNING GRANT FROM THAT AGENCY." A motion was made by Lozano, seconded by Garcia, and carried (5 — 0) to adopt Resolution No. 2012-013, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AUTHORIZING STAFF TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION UPON RECEIPT OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE PLANNING GRANT FROM THAT AGENCY." AYES: Garcia, Garcia, Lozano, Pacheco, Rubio NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 7. APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 2012-014 AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (Caltrans) UPON RECEIPT OF A TRANSPORTATION PLANNING GRANT (SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PLAN) Staff recommends the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2012-013, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AUTHORIZING STAFF TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION UPON RECEIPT OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE PLANNING GRANT FROM THAT AGENCY." A motion was made by Lozano, seconded by Garcia, and carried (5 — 0) to adopt Resolution No. 2012-013, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AUTHORIZING STAFF TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION UPON RECEIPT OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE PLANNING GRANT FROM THAT AGENCY." AYES: Garcia, Garcia, Lozano, Pacheco, Rubio Page 4 of 7 NOES: None, ABSENT: None, ABSTAIN: None. 8. RESOLUTION 2012-011 INITIATING THE PROCEEDINGS AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE CITYWIDE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR FY 2012-13 Staff recommends the City Council waive further reading, read by title only, and adopt Resolution No. 2012-011, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AUTHORIZING THE INITIATION OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE FY 2012-13 LEVY OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF DIVISION 15, PART 2 OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE." A motion was made by Lozano, seconded by Garcia, and carried (5 — 0) to waive further reading, read by title only, and adopt Resolution No. 2012-011, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AUTHORIZING THE INITIATION OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE FY 2012-13 LEVY OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF DIVISION 15, PART 2 OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE." AYES: Garcia, Garcia, Lozano, Pacheco, Rubio NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 9. RESOLUTION 2012-012 INITIATING THE PROCEEDINGS AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE PARKS MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR FY 2012-13 Staff recommends City Council waive further reading, read by title only, and adopt Resolution No. 2012-012, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AUTHORIZING THE INITIATION OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE FY 2012-13 LEVY OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK PARKS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF DIVISION 15, PART 2 OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE." A motion was made by Lozano, seconded by Garcia, and carried (5 — 0) to waive further reading, read by title only, and adopt Resolution No. 2012-012, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AUTHORIZING THE INITIATION OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE FY 2012-13 LEVY OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK PARKS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF DIVISION 15, PART 2 OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE." AYES: Garcia, Garcia, Lozano, Pacheco, Rubio NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. Page 5 of 7 10. REQUEST TO AMEND A TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FOR RAMONA BOULEVARD CORRIDOR Staff recommends City Council 1) Authorize the Mayor to execute Amendment No. 1 and 2) Authorize the Public Works Director to administer this program and serve as the City's signature authority over this program. A motion was made by Lozano, seconded by Garcia, and carried (5 — 0) to 1) Authorize the Mayor to execute Amendment No. 1 and 2) Authorize the Public Works Director to administer this program and serve as the City's signature authority over this program. AYES: Garcia, Garcia, Lozano, Pacheco, Rubio NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 11. POTENTIAL AMENDMENT TO THE TRANSIT CENTER PARKING STRUCTURE CONTRACT TO CONSIDER THE DEDUCTIVE ALTERNATE NO. 8 REGARDING LOWER LEVEL PARKING AND STORAGE Staff recommends City Council 1) Approve the contract amendment with PCL Construction Services Inc. for construction of the Lower Level at a cost of $691,000; 2) Authorize the Mayor to execute a contract amendment after review by the City Attorney and after it has been executed by the contractor; 3) Authorize Finance Director to appropriate $300,000 from Federal Asset Forfeiture and $391,000 from Prop C and to carry forward any remaining balance not spent to the FY 2012-2013 budget for this project; 4) Direct the Public Works Director to seek necessary approvals and complete paperwork to sue Prop C funds; and 5) Staff further recommends that the City Council authorize the Finance Director to designate additional $300,000 in Prop C in case use of Asset Forfeiture Funds is not approved. A motion was made by Lozano, seconded by Garcia, and carried (5 — 0) to 1) Approve the contract amendment with PCL Construction Services Inc. for construction of the Lower Level at a cost of $691,000; 2) Authorize the Mayor to execute a contract amendment after review by the City Attorney and after it has been executed by the contractor; 3) Authorize Finance Director to appropriate $300,000 from Federal Asset Forfeiture and $391,000 from Prop C and to carry forward any remaining balance not spent to the FY 2012-2013 budget for this project; 4) Direct the Public Works Director to seek necessary approvals and complete paperwork to sue Prop C funds; and 5) Staff further recommends that the City Council authorize the Finance Director to designate additional $300,000 in Prop C in case use of Asset Forfeiture Funds is not approved. AYES: Garcia, Garcia, Lozano, Pacheco, Rubio NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. CITY COUNCIL I CITY CLERK / CITY TREASURER I STAFF REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS • Request by Mayor Lozano for discussion and direction to staff to: Schedule a study session to discuss the safety of drinking water in the City of Baldwin Park and the process to promptly alert the residents in case of an emergency relating to the quality and safety of drinking water; and invite the water companies serving the City to the study session. Page 6 of 7 Mayor Lozano directed staff to contact all of the surrounding water districts and water agencies and schedule a Special Meeting / Study Session so that all concerned entities can discuss coordination of efforts in the event the community's drinking water supply becomes contaminated as it did last week. Councilmember Pacheco noted that, while the City has asked that residents maintain their property and keeping landscape in check, the City is not doing a very good job with landscape maintenance; directed staff to prepare a monthly report on the status of city - owned property and the maintenance plan. Request by Mayor Pro Tem Rubio for discussion and consideration on the following: To create an "Environmental Commission" that can do the following: o Research and make recommendations to the city council on policies that may enhance the quality of Baldwin Park's environment o Pursue grant opportunities when we qualify to be a Tree City USA - Be responsible for organizing our Annual Arbor Day Celebration o Advise the Council on areas in the City with the greatest need for trees and/or tree maintenance o Work in conjunction with staff to finalize the Tree Master Plan. This item was not discussed during this meeting. • Request by Councilmember Monica Garcia to inform Council on the following: Report back on a presentation made by Baldwin Park Junior High students in which they shared their ideas on "EI Taller", "The Rink", "Expressions"'and "NBA for Teens." This item was not discussed during this meeting. ADJOURNMENT There being no other business to discuss, and all other matters having been addressed, a motion was made by Lozano, seconded by Rubio, to adjourn the meeting at 8:15 p.m. Mayor ATTEST: Manuel Lozano, Mayor Alejandra Avila, City Clerk APPROVED: Page 7 of 7 ITEM NO. MINUTES BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL AND BALDWIN PARK PLANNING COMMISSION STUDY SESSION AND SPECIAL JOINT MEETING MARCH 28,2012,6:30 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBER -14403 E. Pacific Avenue, Baldwin Park, 91706 CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Lozano, ROLL CALL CITY COUNCIL PRESENT: Councilmember Ricardo Pacheco Councilmember Marlen Garcia Councilmember Monica Garcia Mayor Pro Tem Susan Rubio Mayor Manuel Lozano PLANNING COMMISSION PRESENT: Commissioner Ralph Galvan Commissioner George Silva Commissioner Natalie Ybarra Planning Vice Chair David L. Muse Planning Chair Angela Alvarado PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Mayor Lozano opened Public Communications at 6:30 p.m. Ken Woods, Baldwin Park resident, commented on the skills needed to be an effective legislative officer; commented on a decision on zoning for Garden Apartments, opining that the contractor is being given special dispensation. Greif Tuttle, Baldwin Park business owner, commented on the zoning decision for Garden Apartments and the concessions that are being given to the contractor; commented on the rezoning caused by Ordinance 1290. Cruz Baca, Baldwin Park resident, asked why the planning commission decision is being question after it was decided that Alderson would not be rezoned; noted that the decision to rezone is impractical and does not suit the neighborhood Norma, Baldwin Park resident, expressed concern regarding drive-thru restaurants; asked that Planning Commission keep in mind the distance between drive-thru restaurants and schools. Seeing no one else wishing to speak, Public Communications were closed at 6:42 p.m. Councilmember Marlen Garcia commented on the purpose of this meeting, pointing out that change is important and can benefit the entire community. Page 1 of 2 OPEN SESSION A. COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE ZONING CODE, SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AND DESIGN GUIDELINES B. MODIFICATION TO ORDINANCES 1290 AND 1337 AS PART OF COMPREHENSIVE ZONING CODE UPDATE City Planner Amy Harbin provided an overview of the effects of the code updates and the impact on the community; Ms. Harbin explained that some of the code updates and zoning changes were necessary to comply with State mandated directives; explained that comprehensive code update is being revised to include graphics, pictures, tables and more "user friendly" terminology. Discussion ensued and Ms. Harbin was asked to elaborate on some of the differences between the various types of zoning designation; Council inquired about the types of concerns that were expressed by the public; Planning Chair Angela Alvarado explained that there was a great deal of public testimony with regard to the suggested changes, particularly with regard to Alderson and with regard to drive-thru restaurants. Planning Chair Alvarado, City Planner Harbin, and Community Development Manager Marc Castagnola responded to questions by explaining that the zoning code is a living document, meaning it can be changed as necessary; noted that the master plan can only be changed four times a year; illustrated the various areas that will be effected by the zoning changes and those that will not; noted that much of this is driven to redevelopment efforts and changes can be made later as necessary. Council directed the Planning Commission to research the definitions associated with various types of vehicles, for shuttle buses in particular, to determine whether language could be crafted and the scope of permitted vehicles could be identified more specifically. Council also directed staff to incorporate language to remove the restriction of professional offices in the freeway zoning area and lift the restriction of Ordinance 1290 in the downtown business area; prepare a summary of the current and proposed code restrictions for drive-thru restaurants; ensure design guidelines are incorporated into the zoning update. Council directed staff to incorporate language to remove the restriction of professional offices in the freeway zoning area and lift the restriction of Ordinance 1290 in the downtown business area. Councilmember Pacheco requested that an additional Study Session be scheduled with the Planning Commission to further discuss the vision for development of the downtown business area. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Lozano adjourned the meeting at 7:35 p.m.. ATTEST: Mayor City Clerk APPROVED: Page 2 of 2 ITEM NO. 4 ID MINUTES BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION AND SPECIAL MEETING NOVEMBER 4, 2015, 6:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBER - 14403 E. Pacific Avenue, Baldwin Park, 91706 CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m. by Mayor Lozano, ROLL CALL PRESENT: Councilmember Ricardo Pacheco Councilmember Susan Rubio Mayor Pro Tem Cruz Baca Mayor Manuel Lozano ABSENT: Councilmember Monica Garcia PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Mayor Lozano opened Public Communications at 6:00 p.m. Seeing no one wishing to speak, Public Communications closed at 6:00 p.m. OPEN SESSION There being no items for consideration in Open Session, Mayor Lozano recessed Open Session to Closed Session at 6:00 p.m. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT (GC §54957): Title: Finance Director 2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9: Potential Case(s): Two (2) Page 1 of 2 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, motion was made by Lozano, seconded by Pacheco, to adjourn the meeting at 6:20 p.m. Mayor Lozano stated that no reportable action was taken on items discussed during Closed Session. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED: Page 2 of 2 MINUTES BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 4, 2015, 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBER -14403 E. Pacific Avenue, Baldwin Park, 91706 These minutes are presented in Agenda order. Various announcements or discussions may have occurred before or after the title under which they are presented. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Lozano at 7:00 p.m. INVOCATION The invocation was provided by Councilmember Pacheco. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilmember Pacheco, ROLL CALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Council Member Ricardo Pacheco Council Member Susan Rubio Mayor Pro Tem Cruz Baca Mayor Manuel Lozano MEMBERS ABSENT:. Council Member Monica Garcia REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION Mayor Lozano stated that no reportable action was taken on items discussed during Closed Session. ANNOUNCEMENTS Mayor Pro Tem Baca asked that the evening's meeting be closed in memory of Fred McNeil who succumbed to Alzheimer's Disease; extended condolences to his parents Julia and Robert McNeil. PROCLAMATIONS COMMENDATIONS PRESENTATIONS • Presentation by Kaiser Permanente to bring attention to Domestic Violence Awareness Month This presentation was taken from the agenda. PUBLIC CO1t MUNIICATIONS Mayor Lozano opened Public Communications at 7:01 p.m. and noted that each speaker is permitted a total of three (3) minutes to speak. Gilbert Padilla, Baldwin Park resident, congratulated those who were successful in the election and expressed appreciation for the democratic process. Daniel Lovanos, representing One Legacy - Donate Life, provided a status on the efforts of his organization in the Baldwin Park and greater San Gabriel Valley; thanked Council for their continued support. Arturo Luna, Baldwin Park resident, expressed his objection to the Director of Public Works and the Chief Executive Officer making decisions and spending tax payers money; asked why they are allowed to make decisions if they are not Baldwin Park residents; opined that the ones making decisions for spending [Baldwin Park] tax payers money should be residents of the city. Seeing no others wishing to speak, Public Communications closed at 7:11 p.m CONSENT CALENDAR Item No. 4 was pulled from the Consent Calendar for further discussion. 1. WARRANTS AND DEMANDS Staff recommends City Council ratify the attached Warrants and Demands Register. A motion was made by Lozano, seconded by Pacheco, and carried (4 — 0; Garcia was absent) to ratify the Warrants and Demands Register. AYES: Baca, Lozano, Pacheco, Rubio NOES: None. ABSENT: Garcia ABSTAIN: None. 2. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES Receive and file: A. Meeting Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings held on February 1, 2012. B. Meeting Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings held on October 7, 2015. C. Meeting Minutes of the Finance Authority, Housing Authority, Special and Regular City Council Meetings held on October 21, 2015. A motion was made by Lozano, seconded by Pacheco, and carried (4 — 0; Garcia was absent) to receive and file the minutes. AYES: Baca, Lozano, Pacheco, Rubio NOES: None. ABSENT: Garcia ABSTAIN: None. 3. CONDUCT A SECOND READING, BY TITLE ONLY AND WAIVE FURTHER READING, AND FOLLOWING SUCH READING, ADOPT ORDINANCE 1379, ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTERS 153.160 AND 153.220.130 MODIFYING THE WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPING STANDARDS AND `L' DEFINITIONS TO BE CONSISTENT WITH STATE LAW." Page 2 of 4 Staff recommends that Council adopt Ordinance No. 1379 on second reading, read by title only, and waive further reading thereof. A motion was made by Lozano, seconded by Pacheco, and carried (4 — 0; Garcia was absent) to approve and adopt Ordinance No. 1379 on second reading, read by title only, and waive further reading thereof. AYES: Baca, Lozano, Pacheco, Rubio NOES: None. ABSENT: Garcia ABSTAIN: None. 4. ACCEPT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND AUTHORIZE PUBLISHING A NOTICE INVITING BIDS FOR CITY PROJECT NO. 2015-0102 — MAJOR STREET REHABILITIATION PROJECT Staff recommends that Council approve the plans and specifications for the Major Street Rehabilitation — Various Locations Citywide (City Project No. 2015-0102) and authorize staff to advertise the invitation to bid. Councilmember Pacheco began by saying that the projects that will be realized out of this bid will be funded by gasoline tax, not the General Fund; noted that the improvements will make a tremendous difference in the community. A motion was made by Pacheco, seconded by Lozano, and carried (4 — 0; Garcia was absent) to receive and file the minutes. AYES: Baca, Lozano, Pacheco, Rubio NOES: None. ABSENT: Garcia ABSTAIN: None. 5. REVIEW OF CURRENT APPLICATIONS AND CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENT OF STUDENT MEMBERS OF RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION Staff recommends that Council review the submitted Student Commission application(s), accept nomination(s), appoint the selected individual(s) to the Parks and Community Services Commission and adopt Resolution No. 2015-090, entitled, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park Appointing Qualified Students From Three Baldwin Park High Schools To The Recreation & Community Services Commission Of The City Of Baldwin Park To Office Numbers 6, 7 And 8." A motion was made by Lozano, seconded by Pacheco, and carried (4 — 0; Garcia was absent) to move this item to the next Regular meeting. AYES: Baca, Lozano, Pacheco, Rubio NOES: None, ABSENT: Garcia ABSTAIN: None. Page 3 of 4 CITY COUNCIL / CITY CLERK / CITY TREASURER I STAFF REQUESTS COMMUNICATIONS ADJOURNMENT There being no other business to discuss, and all other matters having been addressed, a motion was made by Lozano, seconded by Rubio, to adjourn the meeting at 7:15 p.m. Mayor ATTEST; Manuel Lozano, Mayor Alejandra Avila, City Clerk APPROVED: Page 4 of 4 ITEM NO. 10 STAFF REPORT' ' ° TO: Honorable lei. :t id' City Councilmembers N Huor, , k V , FROM: Michael'Fay r, hie ` of Police I xt' SA� BRI L �K� � � ,,,,4A/ LEY '„' rE DATE: November 18, 2015. s SUBJECT: 9-1-1 COMMUNICATIONS UPGRADE SUMMARY This report seeks City Council approval to upgrade the Emergency 9-1-1 telephone system, to remain in compliance with "Next Generation 9-1-1 technology". Additionally the police department is seeking approval of upgrading the dispatch center. These have not been upgraded within the past 10 years and have exceeded their intended life span. This area of the police department is in full operation 24 hours a day, year round. FISCAL IMPACT There will be no impact to the general fund. The majority of the project will be funded by the State of California 9-1-1 CPE (Customer Premise Equipment) fund, ($292,671.96). This amount is billed directly to the state of California by the vendors. There are items that are off contract that are fully reimbursable through the same fund, ($12,819.58) There are some components that are not covered by the State Fund. ($2,403.00). These components can be covered by state asset forfeiture funds. The total cost of the upgrade will be $295,074.96. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends City Council approval to: 1. Waive the formal bidding process for the 9-1-1 system upgrade, per Baldwin Park Municipal Codes §34.37 and §34.23 (C). 2. Authorize the Finance Director to complete a budget amendment for an amount not to exceed $� 21,152 from account 206-30-320-58110-00000-2 and designate15� for restricted purchase of the 9-1-1 system upgrades, ($12,819.58 will be reimbursed back to the account) and 3. Authorize the Chief of Police, or his designee, to complete all appropriate documentation to complete the modernization. BACKGROUND The Baldwin Park Police Department Communications Center is dedicated to providing the best and most reliable services to our community. The police dispatch center has not had any type of upgrade since 2005. Our dispatch equipment is outdated and in need of an immediate upgrade. We must be prepared for "Next Generation 9-1-1 ". NG911 will enhance the 911 system to create a faster, more flexible system that allows us to keep up with communication technology used by the public. The Baldwin Park Police Communications Center, or commonly referred to as the police dispatch center, is responsible for receiving and processing emergency and routine calls for service. The center is also responsible for dispatching the necessary law enforcement personnel and equipment in response to those calls. Due to changing technology, dispatch is now responsible for receipt of wireless and landline 9-1-1 emergency telephone calls, that will soon include 9-1-1 text messages. Calls are routinely transferred to the Los Angeles County Fire Department, Highway Patrol and out of jurisdiction police departments as needed. 911 upgrade Paae 2 Dispatch is currently comprised of (5) workstations. Each workstation consists of (3) computers, (6) monitors, (1) radio base and (1) uninterrupted power source (UPS) system. The computers run several operating systems simultaneously. VESTA Pallas is the current telephone system (both hardware and software) used in Dispatch. This current format of VESTA is no longer supported. The telephone system receives 9-1-1, routine police, building emergency and routine in-house calls. The telephone system also receives emergency calls via direct lines from the Los Angeles County Fire Department and California Highway Patrol. The software contains telephone numbers for utility companies, employees, hospitals, various police agencies and other numbers necessary for emergency call outs. Usual purchasing practices in acquiring major equipment is by following formal bid procedures, which are outlined in the Baldwin Park Municipal code §34.37. Staff requests Council approve the purchase of the necessary components for a complete upgrade of the 9-1-1- system, pursuant to Baldwin Park Municipal Code §34.37 cooperative purchasing agreements, which notes that "whenever Council finds that the public interest and convenience require, the city may purchase city supplies and equipment utilizing purchasing agreements maintained by the county, state, or other public agencies without complying with the requirements of this chapter. " Through an informal bidding process, staff contacted AT&T, Verizon and Carousel to provide the 911 system upgrades. All three companies are CMAS (California Multiple Award Schedule) participants. After reviewing all the proposals, staff recommends AT&T for the upgrade. The recommendation is based on cost and level of service. The total cost associated with this project also includes 5 years of maintenance service. Usual purchasing practices in acquiring major equipment is by following formal bid procedures, which are outlined in the Baldwin Park Municipal code §34.23 (C). "When the City Council by four-fifths vote determines to dispense with such bidding and other procedures required by the above-mentioned sections in any individual instance upon a finding by the Council that it would be impractical, useless or uneconomical in such instance to follow the procedures, and that the welfare of the public would be promoted by dispensing with the same. " Staff has determined that it would be "uneconomical" to go out to formal bid for workstation vendors. Staff contacted 2 workstation vendors that complete this type of project, "Xybix" located in Littleton, Co. and "Russ Bassett" located in Whittier Ca. Xybix offered to refurbish our current furniture at a lower cost, however this seems impractical as they are located out of state. They are also not readily available for immediate repairs if needed. Staff recommends Russ Bassett, as it offers new state of the art, ergonomically designed, and ADA compliant equipment. They are local, which is highly desirable in the event that repairs are needed. LECAL REVIEW This has been reviewed by the city attorney as to form and content. ALTERNATIVES There are no alternatives, as our current technology will no longer be supported. ATTACHMENTS #1, AT&T Scope of Work #2, Russ Basset Quote and Communications Center Layout #3, Dell Computer Equipment and Quote #4, Phone Supplements Quote AccouqtMgna9er JOHN BOURNE 909/591-6590 SE JOHN BOURNE CystomeL_Name SOC E911/ STATE OF CALIF ZEA - CA PrhnytjTra!j§port Service Verizon Select Services Inc. VX--r1z9—n Quote # Revision. I-10U8PSA 2 Currency Quote Date USD 02/27/2014 M "x/f �gga Oman m/ 0 VIN 11/0111,11, Site Level TitlelDescription: Maintenance Pa nt rtt. C tion: Monthly Site ID: j -1 —OUBL.Q—X CPE and Related Services for this Site will be provided by: Verizon Entity: Verizon Select Services Inc Site Address, 14403 PACIFIC AVE SITE NAME.1 -1 OU8PSV Verizon Country: USA Bill To: 14403 PACIFIC AVE BALDWIN PARK,CA,91706 BALDWIN PARK,CA,91706 BALDWIN PARK,CA,91706 USA USA USA All pricing is valid untii:0312912014 Quote #I-10U8PSA Quotes are exclusive of Taxes Page I of 12 Verizon proprietary information The equipment listed on this quote is solely far domestic use in the United States Contracting entities and Exchange Rate rules will be as defined in the contractual agreement Part NumberDesetipgo 870899-00104.2 VESTA 4 R2 LIC/DOC/MED VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 247 - 4 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 873099-03002 CCINC 4.X CAD INTFC LIC VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 24X7 - 4 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 853031-MLSV RSG -1 V -ML SVR B N D L SNGL VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 240 - 4 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 06500-00501 2 -POST 5U RACKIVINT KIT VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 247 - 4 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 870899-0036OU VESTA 4 SEAT UPGD LIC VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 24X7 - 4 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 61000-409603SFF WKST HP Z220 SFF VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 24X7 - 4 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 Verizon Select Services Inc. vierizgo Qt I Unit SaleExten Price §,a_1esPdc_e 2 $2,041.75 $4,083.50 2 $2,129.28 2 2 2 2 5 5 5 5 $680.58 $26,240.60 $355.27 $4,764.08 $2,161.53 $1,361.16 $532.80 $26,240.60 $9,000.48 $710.54 $278.40 $23,820.40 $9,314.40 $10,807.65 $3,528.00 All pricing is w0d until:0312912014 Quote #I-10U8PSA Quotes are exclusive of Taxes Page 2 of 12 Verizon proprietary information The equipment listed on this quote is solely for domestic use in the United States Contracting entities and Exchange Rate rules will be as defined in the contractual agreement Verizon Select Services Inc. Ilieriz9af III 65000-47001 Z220 SFF TOWER STAND 5 $57.17 $285.85 VZM-Bi1-OS-24OX4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 247 - 4 5 $93.60 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 63000-202502 MNTR 20IN FP LCD BLK 5 $321.24 $1,606.20 VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 247 - 4 5 $523.20 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 64007-50017 KEYPAD 24KEY W/25FT CBL 5 $157.89 $789.45 VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 24X7 - 4 5 $259.20 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 04000-01005 KVM DVI 4 -PORT SWITCH 5 $328.04 $1,640.20 VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 247 - 4 5 $535.20 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 853004-00401 SAM EXT SPKR KIT 5 $228.67 $1,143.35 VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 24X7 - 4 5 $441.60 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 853030-00302 CCINC 4.X SAM SENT HDWR KIT 5 $2,248.65 $11,243.25 VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 240 - 4 5 $4,396.80 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 809800-35108 R4 IWS STG FEE 5 $408.35 $2,041.75 VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 24X7 - 4 5 $1,065.60 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 All pricing is valid finti1�0,31291?0,14 Quote I-10U8PSA Quotes are exclusive of Taxes Page 3 of 12 Verizon proprietary information The equipment listed on this quote is solely for domestic use in the United States Contracting entities and Exchange Rate rules will be as defined in the contractual agreement !' i Verizon Select Services Inc. � i j/G /1 40 riz90 870890-07501 CPR/SYSPREP IMAGING 1 $0.00 $0.00 VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 247 - 4 1 $177.60 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 873099-00502 CCINC 4.X IRR LIC/DOC/MED 5 $1,354.36 $6,771.80 VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 240 - 4 5 $2,649.60 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 873099-00602U CCINC 4.X CDR LIC UPGD 2 $0.0J $0.00 VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 24x7 - 4 2 $0.00 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 873099-01102U CCINC 4.X CDR PER SEAT UPGD 5 $0.00 $0.00 VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 24x7 - 4 5 $0.00 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 64040-60020 PRINTER O/W USB LASERJET 1, $507.71 $507.71 VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 240 - 4 :9. $165.60 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 65000-03133 CBL USB PRINTER 10FT 1 $13.61 $13.61 VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 24x7 - 4 1 $4.32 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 04000-26201 SWITCH 24 -PORT 2620 2 $739.11 $1,478.22 VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 24x7 - 4 2 $482.88 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 2213937-1-SR1 PAT FXO GATEWAY 8PORT 2 $1,795.39 $3,590.78 All pricing is valid until:03/29/2014 Quote 1-10U8PSA Quotes are exclusive of Taxes Page 4 of 12 Verizon proprietary information The equipment listed on this quote is solely fordomestic use In the United States Contracting entities and Exchange Rote rules will be as defined in the contractual agreement . . ... . .. j �g Verizon Select Services Inc. &W, veriZgp VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 24X7 - 4 2 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 2213938 -1 -SRI PAT FXS GATEWAY 4PORT 2 VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 24X7 - 4 2 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 03800-03030 FIREWALL- MODEM 60 1 VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 24X7 - 4 1 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 809800-00201 VPN CONFIG SERVICE 1 06500-55053 ECI,PMT RACK 19 INCH I VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 247 - 4 1 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 63002-172805 MNTR 171N W/SPKRS NEC I VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 24X7 - 4 1 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 64021-10025 KYBD/MOUSE BUNDLE I VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 24X7 - 4 1 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 04000-004134 KVM 4 -PORT SWITCH I VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 240 - 4 1 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 All pricing is valid until:0312912014 Quote #I-10U8PSA Quotes are exclusive of Taxes Verizon proprietary information The equipment listed on this quote is solely for domestic use in the United States Contracting entities and Exchange Rate rules will be as defined in the contractual agreement $981,40 $78,6,76 $272.23 $374.33 $298.10 Em $1,403.52 $1,962.80 $768.00 Page 5 of 12 0, $272.23 $374.33 $156.96 N $59.89 $19.20 $601.64 $196.32 04000-00607 CBL KVM USB CONSOLE V2M-*E911-OS-24X1X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 24X7 - 4 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 04000-60611 CBL KVM USB 10FT VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 24X7 - 4 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 04000-RMM19 BRKT 191N RACK MTG/ARBITR VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 240 - 4 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 870899-00304.0 VESTA 4.0 PER SEAT LIC VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 24X7 - 4 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 61050 -J409611 -W7 SENT CPOST 8570P W7 VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 24X7 - 4 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 04000-00486 ADV DOCK STATION 8570P VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 24X7 - 4 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 04401-00097 BATTERY 9 -CELL 8570P 100WH VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 247 - 4 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 Verizon Select Services Inc. vertzg" $187.84 4 $112.98 4 $43.55 I $7,486.42 $1,894.75 $548.55 $385.20 $187.84 $60.96 $451.92 $147.84 $43.55 $16.80 $7,486.42 $2,927.52 $1,894.75 $617.28 All pricing is valid untii:0312912014 Quote #I-10U8PSA Quotes are exclusive of Taxes Page 6 of 12 Verizon proprietary information lhi.p pquipment N Wd on this quote is soh4y ftwdomesNc use in the UnRed Stoles ronteacting ent4ies and Exchange Rate mW5 will w? as defieted in the contrucNal agreement $548.55 $179.04 $385.20 $125.76 Verizon Select Services Inc. 64021-10025 KYBD/MOUSE BUNDLE 1 $59.89 $59.89 VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 247 - 4 1 $19.20 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 63000-202502 MNTR 20IN FP LCD BLK 1 $321.24 $321.24 VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 24x7 - 4 1, $104.64 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 853004-00401 SAM EXT SPKR KIT 1 $228.67 $228.67 VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 24x7 - 4 1 $88.32 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 64007-50017 KEYPAD 24KEY W/25FT CBL 1 $157.89 $157.89 VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 24x7 - 4 1 $51.84 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 853004-00301 PAT 3.X SAM CPOST HDWR KIT 1 $3,106.18 $3,106.18 VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 24x7 - 4 1 $1,214.40 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 809800-35109 R4IWSCFG 1 $272.23 $272.23 VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 24x7 - 4 1 $142.08 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 809800-35108 R4IWSSTGFEE 1 $408,3.5 $408.35 VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 24x7 - 4 1 $213.12 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 873099-00502 CCINC 4.X IRR LIC/DOC/MED 1 $1,354.36 $1,354.36 All pricing is vu lid until:0312912014 Quote #1-10U8PSA Quotes are exclusive of Taxes Page 7 of 12 Verizon proprietary information The equipment listed on this quote is solely for domestic use in the United States Contracting entities and Exchange Rate rules will be as defined in the contractual agreement Verizon Select Services Inc. VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 247 - 4 1 Maintenance Term (Months): HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 AURORA 2.2 DOC/MED 873099-01102 R4 CDR PER SEAT LIC 1 $122.51 VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 24X7 - 4 1 Maintenance Term (Months): HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 AURORA STD LIC 873391-00201 AURORA COLLECTION LIC VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 24X7 - 4 $1,088.94 VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 24X7 - 4 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 AURORA USER LICENSE 871391-20103.0 ORVL 3 0 LIC ONLY 1 $4,764.08 %JZhA-E01 I -r1S-2"-7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 247 - 4 1 $0.00 $2,722.34 $1,020.88 ME $122.51 $48.00 $1,088.94 $425.76 $4,764.08 $1,862.88 $0.00 $0.00 0 $1,020.88 $398.88 $239.57 Page 8 of 12 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 873399-00102.2 AURORA 2.2 DOC/MED VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 247 - 4 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 873391-00501 AURORA STD LIC VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 24X7 - 4 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 873391-00301 AURORA USER LICENSE VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 24X7 - 4 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 04000-00339 SQL 2008R2 CAL RUN ENT All pricing is valid until:0312912014 Qgote #I-10U8PSA Quotes are exclusive of Taxes Verizon proprietary information The equipment listed on this quote is solely for domestic use in the United States Contracting entities and Exchange Rate rules will be as defined in the contractual agreement $0.00 $2,722.34 $1,020.88 ME $122.51 $48.00 $1,088.94 $425.76 $4,764.08 $1,862.88 $0.00 $0.00 0 $1,020.88 $398.88 $239.57 Page 8 of 12 Aj ,1' '' ' Y, % ij%' Verizon Select Services Inc �/%if VZM-E911-05-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 247 - 4 t HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 873391-00201 AURORA COLLECTION LIC 5 VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 247 - 4 5 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 873391-00901 AURORA ADV RPT PKG LIC 1 VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 24x7 - 4 1. HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 873391-01801 AURORA VELA/MAPSTAR INTG 1 VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 24x7 - 4 1 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 BA-MOO-ASAO V -AUR STD ADD-ON 1 VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 24x7 - 4 a HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 64040-60019 PRINTER USB COLOR 1 VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 24x7 - 4 1 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 65000-03133 CBL USB PRINTER 10FT t- VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 24x7 - 4 1 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 871399-20103.0 ORVL 3 0 LIC DOC MED 1 VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 24x7 - 4 1 All pricing is vd'Wd until:03/29/2014 Quote #I-10U8PSA Quotes are exclusive afToxes Verizon proprietary Information The equipment listed on this quote is solely for domestic use in the United States Contracting entities and Exchange Rate rules will be as defined in the contractual agreement $1,088.94 $4,764.08 $0.00 $5,745.49 $ 243.65 $13.61 $77.76 $5,444.70 $2,128.80 $4,764.08 $1,862.88 $0.00 $1,331.04 $5,745.49 $1,962.24 $243.65 $79.68 $13.61 $4.32 $4,764.08 $4,764.08 $1,862.88 Page 9 of 12 Verizon Select Services Inc. ver7zep HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 871391-20103.0 ORVL 3 0 LIC ONLY 4 $4,764.08 $19,056.32 VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 24X7 - 4 4 $7,451.52 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 861390-00101 OR VELA MAP BUILD -STD 1 $2,835.31 $2,835.31 VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 24X7 - 4 1 $924.00 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 861363-00101 OR VELA MAP -RPT CTRLN 1 $899.73 $899.73 VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 24X7 - 4 1 $292.80 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 871499-01210 M&R 3.0 IP DEVICES LIC 8 $96.64 $773.12 VZM-E911-OS-24X7X4 VERIZON E911 MAINTENANCE - ON-SITE - 240 - 4 8 $303.36 HOUR Maintenance Term (Months): 60 SUBLABOR-E911 SUBCONTRACTOR LABOR -E911 5 $243.18 $1,215.90 809800-35109 R4 IWS CFG SUBLABOR-E911 SUBCONTRACTOR LABOR -E911 4 $1,459.09 $5,836.36 000001-06701 VSENT 4.X AGENT TRNG SUBLABOR-E911 SUBCONTRACTOR LABOR -E911 1 $4,863.64 $4,863.64 000001-06704 VSENT4.XADMIN TRNG SUBLABOR-E911 SUBCONTRACTOR LABOR -E911 1 $2,431.82 $2,431.82 000002-24404 AURORA ADMIN TRNG SUBLABOR-E911 SUBCONTRACTOR LABOR -E911 1 $1,459.09 $1,459.09 000001-45711 ORVL AGENT TRNG All pricing is valid until:0312912014 Quote I-10U8PSA Quotes are exclusive of Taxes Page 10 of 12 Verizon proprietary information The equipment listed on this quote is solely fordomestic use in the United States Contracting entities and Exchange Rate rules will be as defined in the contractual agreement SUBLABOR-E911 SUBCONTRACTOR LABOR -E911 000001-25714 ORVL ADMIN TRNG E911EQUIP-VENDORDISC E911 EQUIPMENT VENDOR DISCOUNT E911 LABOR R E911 LABOR - OFFICE HOURS E911 LABOR 0 E911 LABOR - OVERTIME E911 PROJECT MGT R E911 PROJECT MANAGEMENT - OFFICE HOURS Additianal Notes: Site 1-101,J'9115V Description Quote Details and Assumptions Verizon Select Services Inc. 1 $7,295.45 $7,295.45 1 -$73.93 -$73.93 130 $100.00 $13,000.00 8 $150.00 $1,200.00 95 $100.00 $9,500.00 Vesta 4.2 5 positions • Small Form Factor Workstations • Dual NIC cards for each workstation • Wide Screen 20" LCD minimum monitor at each position • 4 Port KVIVI arbitrator at each position 24 Key Genovation Keypad with extended cable at each position Sound Arbitration Module, (SAM) at each position • Extender cables 12' minimum at each position IRR for Radio at each position Netclock 9483 • 1 Command Post pas with docking station Aurora MIS • Orion Vela • Monitor and Response from Cassidian for 5 years • Agent and Administrative Training to be provided by Cassidian Complete turnkey solution to include installation, project management and 5 years of maintenance All pricing is valid until:0312912014 Quote #I-10U8PSA Quotes are exclusive of Taxes Page 11 of 12 Verizon proprietary information The equipment listed on this quote is solely for domestic use in the United States Contracting entities and Exchange Rate rules will be as defined in the contractual agreement Verizon Select Services Inc. Total Extended Sales Price Equipment: $173,823.29 Labor: $46,802.26 Maintenance: $66,996.48 Vendor Support, Monitor & Response, Antivirus & Patch Mgmt 5 yrs: $109,603.80 Sales Tax 9.0%: $15,644.10 GrandTotal: $412,869.93 All pricing is valid until:0312912014 Quote I-I0U8PSA Quotes are exclusive of Taxes Verizon proprietary Information The equipment listed on this quote is solely for domestic use in the United States Contracting entities and Exchange Rate rules will be as defined In the contractual agreement -� W Vr Ut RI gyp.>>>>>>> -557a7o�7am;:ammmmmmx,nn C: nnnC7C)(�cncncncn���m�-om�vcncncn<ncncn r r . ;u;v70Xmmmp nwTnw<G�iE`L-- m7'XOUDpw W W W-nc,D>woW ooW oOooww Q- Z (Q cV C�yNO O O Ob coU,0 OZa ZN<<<<0 C,@(`inwCCCCN -041-14 ZOw w NW NNN -P N O 0 - N N N N n n. IQ IQ Z Z Z Z W W ( Ca e µ v v -g ®W ®o o o® 0-c c (��o C 2 2 2 c�L- Q n o ro O C Q.Q O �n (@ @ � r C C Gr '. Q Q o O Ot (a 3 Q@ n n n Q C S S (n O o fA o i✓� <n va vs en ro . Q : (D Ci @ m @ @ @ @ @_ @ ii C t Ci o 7 o Q ro ®� _ (Q (Q (O fn (ca "'� (o (�1 (Q (O � sn -, @ @ ro @ � o r�r @ a; ro v: CS C) ocia yo n()nn'(d fD � 3 Q-(D(.,M U5 n.Q@ tiv, Q�.m (D (D @ c cp Q vv cU O. i o ®. ®" ® ®: ®. Q. Q. CPx Q a Q Q O o m X... Q Q � t ,w �x x �3.®;®®ho 01 ol n oprn wG rw twa0�— Q, j O V V G3 W YC W. r r r r O O� -i vw -n- 7a _ _ 0 � - - O C7 X X X 41, X r r :fl -W o 0 O O �i �w...J.47(?'7r�JM.a,NM X X < 333 QQ� 0 oa , Ka.� mmm3 = R"^,i f'"P T'SS=NN d N (a (0(0 Q O CA) z r G7 r S S _ D Q x X O 0 O � S NN0 c Co O S.S ;,n r- r„ ((a : q (( 4'j (A v IWW (P K M O o m M D®H ® -a<O Z A Z ®' ` m = pZ® ®p' Dym e DDZ CA ()m ®”( r X m (A -o A m rn m Z (:Y O' C)' Q A N ® ry® Ol p. Q p -,oa 6 W @ Q0 W )' W W _ Ln Ln Q ® 00 C1 m OD pity T O (!1 ® cn w z (� (n 0 y < n Q Cp cmi, CD 0 01 03 O 3 QQvµ = .W m®CY 10 .w COW OQµ< O O O 77Q cnTQzTCcl :@ 10 o D w�oa N 00 mZ Orn m p=ZmmD p®0 mDmmm�Xr n[NN�CD 10 CrI O ( p ODD�N UNpoUCL O V O AO(n CDCD > Baa 0 3 n w:.S'� 9; TR m 0 m O X e`_. ep "' < 0 m t} 5 mZ �k �' 0 ^ r.o;90 0 L (DCD0 > 0 :, (D y 0 C7 -4 = m C) oo ._*. p u+ 2• 3 4f (4 O P m O ID vrmi O 0 c of D 6 Q ao... �A" 7 CD O 7 C: CD (1 vw 3 CL (D c (D0 m_ (D D ( 6 d y 1 4 0 Q r r, ' o 3 CD' q. �. o (D V �} `° Q � o CD o n m c00 O on n < 0 0 (D 7 0 �° OQ O Qa=4 o a a0o o � o 0Qc moo rt CD n N C 1 00 Co rt Q 7 N Op_ 4TY o 0 � 0 C O OolO A Qcy Ip m c Ci a T E 64A c �� y Vn m N coDD N p. A - � 00 N 10 Ila 10 0, 1r N :0 �... CO a W N N W O NOp T V O �V O N P N O Cn Z S U) 0 Q Q Q w s 3 ro 3- G O n ro Q_ Q CD N �-' O C F, n ro Cs Q. n o Q a ro (D o a c' oo (Dc� ro O 3 o �-,i a c 3 ro !f.- 0 �. nQn O Q C Q d O x ro m Q ro n .Q s C CD Q. 3 � O g -p ro 0- 0 Q Q `G Q(D rod. (Do :R O o 0 `3 ® :D Q O Q O Q O ro Q C O O 3 ro n (D o Z w 3 �. U (D n ro Z C O n o o O C w � Q Q (n Q Q0- c .. .a Q 0 o o ® 3 Q_ O � � ro Z Q° CD c p 3 w a ro O O n s m n M. 4 -!5 co >70 (D w n w Q n om D :3 O CD �3.... 0 Q O a Q (D O n ° ro O Q_ > > d j 3s� O °G �. O Q ro w ro CO Q 0- t- 0 o c -4 m G o D Q, M m (Q C H m o s acQ o•ai) 3. - v, O 6 r®-4 m 0 e Z 3 o - a gID -o n a m (D m Q c -o :y (D< 3a �n n� (D=m-� Q z m O Q 3 (D C roe C: :3 C Q_ Q= n (D O (n• Z j (Qro O ,Y, cy O -+ Q_ O Q Q_ a Q ® j O ti Q ro (D (Dn c " o o s m k7 c Q Q0 ®a = O (DO Q. O n (Q .z ro :3 c Q Q Q 3 O 3 Q- b °ZT (D n ^ s ro _ (D �•O �• (D3 Q m 3 (D Q " -a 0�C)Q (D ! G _0 (D01 Cir -® Q Ll Q o C T o (D 70 Q QO w Q CD 3 �n (D Q m (Q Q Q + c Q Qc G Q o• n — D C C wm ? - CD G ro, Q n Q Q Q ® (D Q O CD, CD (6 C u D - (D m n m (D Q ?� <CD �. Q Q n Q ZL -Gro (D Cl Ll m o Q n c n °� yOL ® CO ro O Q C ro W n M o< Qw o Cir Q m U� p x s o a Q CDCDL (D c Q w X � m a w 0 (Tp (D b 'a OD p 1® a. 3 N a 0 Z C 3 ro '0 �- `> T O O(D K (b C Q 3 N 0 a n row (D Q r D (D -- n o 0 0 C 3 a Q - n ro n� X 0 3 w s a Q o' (D n c ro o ms < 0 " -0 Q C i� wT D O — ® w 0 M � C Q Q CD w n Q n Q w Q n m O Q X 0 3 C'C 0 = Q.n � (D �Q C (D Q (D = Q- C (D Q w w O (S < 3 6 O w' QW Q Q m Q CD Q o w a m Q Q5.. O ry` K OO U� m n` c -F) O < O :7 O = O C W O Q O O C ~ O nQ• O Q O O -a O K O C O n0, w � O O C Q O �' � Q Q_ (D Q0.3 Q C Q Q6 Q C n Q O Q i3 O O Q C a Q Q_ o � n � C n G (D C O Q C Q O CD w n Q_ O Q 3 w O C Q O 7 w -O W n D O Q C O o a o C 3 Q" Q C _0 n Q Q O O C Q 7 O O. 3 mg w D y C Q O Q Q Q Q Q O N _0 o O OL ® Q G O Q Q CD n D n 0 w (D = Q. O O Z Z O O n Q u :E 5_ CD w a _0 (D ro n (D Q Q � CD Q (D O Q Q (D Q_ 30�= O n 0 �+ (D 7 O (Q w _ n Q (D w S Q W Q m Q (D m m Q C4 0n 5. n o (D O K (Q n O O w Q_ 0 s O :E O (D = Q O U 6 O � O (D 70 O T O '9 w R W O (D ° m0 CD ro QZ y m n c n n O 0 o O O s Q n O O Q 0 O C O `L (D Q D C Q 0 w C O n n n 3m -� n w n0 a w z CA 60O Q m O 5 O O O w 5 Q- Q w � v; n Q Q (D CD O � C 3 Q V o n S C O Q Q O 7 CD (D :3 = u (D O n m 7 ro n O D y Q O (D Q n O OL w C 0 D n a n a � O Q. (® O Q � n Q (D O_ Q O n 0 :3 0 (D Q. O (D Q_ OD O ® 3 O W C O CQ. G 6 O W 3 .. Q. o W ® O n n O ;u �a 3 a cy Q C Q Q w X ® (D , ® N w Q (D O 'oa. N a ? i �/% a s». / 5 > w :. W 2 u CD / j ( k f ® M t.W -rh. N c a m /. 5* \ E e 7 > \ / bobaab#Aa o 77 m § \ ] 0 cn > / 3 § ID / O \ -69\ / / 44- % NJ 3 \ $ ■ \ d § /$G , e w E ƒ c a \ W cu kM § f 9 0 -Vo T). e = 0 CD to F c \\ � c m Q O ƒ /k� 0 � W.2 'a G) > / / � ƒ</ �f� / ?ƒq§ m : m @ CL0 q - a /e / m m>/ 0 CO ƒ z 2 a a 2 g 1 k 2&/ / m>/ ate_ 2 Q 7a%�ve maJ¥ƒ5 .k ® /0ƒ2> m%��(aZ3r- ./0 ƒE� a a@ 2 f / R /©) 2 2 m o \ p e'2 3 2 2$ 0 E m o c c c ® w Q m 0- Cr 7 E a- E c c (n o @ #@ 2 2 E o=■ _ (n � to q \ x q % k / / / c / ¢ / / / D »/% g g J »¥%° E E g» E r - - g c: : m: czn, t -n �1.1) 1.� 1.9 ».�-.9 ~ �/% a s». / k (D # 9 w :. W 2 u q c c w c� (A-4 Q.&0) 0 ww�o��7v0 a Ct ® M t.W -rh. N c a m /. 5* 9) 0aaawo@%w m &, ©.N)&,yba»; &, bobaab#Aa o 77 m.9U«, w;»wawoo»w m w � W N F- O lD w V m Ln -P. W N F, O' w 00 V D1 Ul .p W N Z F, O O O O O -I -1 S S 7� in in vi U;* �n' E N V, 'A N S S S S(D F" F, F" F, F, (p S In In In In D-0 D -0 s--0 n c c c c c c c c c O O O o O c c c c c c o 0 0 0 0 o o o o o o o o o �D In lf7 In 11 Q O O O Q O - r+ , rr , N (D ((DD ((DD (D rDrDN (D ((DD F, F, F, F, �, O m 1 N O rhD (D (D (D (D (D - Ul -• m w w w w 0 -. o- �' O �' O n n n 0 0 n -h -0-0-0-0-0 O a0 2 (—' c c c c c o (D rD m m m r 0 r c E m c m 0_ rz n. Q O_ Ln In c- v Q Q N CL Q- m m m m 0 Z Z vim+ _ M Z z n n n n n rD (D rD � O O C: c c c c n (A in 0 0 0 �^ , O N O DNi v O � 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 3 O - O O (D � O F, (D (D �' 0) to_Q 7' O , r r n n N m (3D (mD rmD N (D n W 0 pl N (�D O C OC' O r�r N O.. C 7 C Z 7 O X O_ fZ r� -s 7 (D C N (D rD (D rD (D 7 7 r+, N O (-1 S 7 D) .=r -I .0 -0 .0-0 CL S Q vi D) + D) A a' 7 ut -o � O D C C C C C -h rD (D W n N Z aq ,rt -O (/) (D rD O N rD 6 (D < 7" D) (D Q N LA 0 rt+ r1+ c n F, h Q c O n� 0 h D o o Q (D n 0- CL rD fD 0 0 0 rD � CL 3 D) (D O O S rr+ CL 3 rz Q �, O QO Q Q p.. N 0 N Q D Q o v rr D O O (<D r+ h D rD <• a 7 Q °° 3 Qn(D m p> r+ Q< �-O pro ° f+ o ro 3 7 Ul c o c: c ct < s rD 3 m 7 � c Q. 7 fl X 0 7 Q O fD 0: 3 cu r F, C I r+ c- O O T 7 � 7 C a rr C7 -0-0 O - 0' rr O O (D rt < O S O '� O 7 0 m (D '< :U V1 -O to v-0 � d ai r- --h m rt v z O 0 0. rr: < 4 rD 7 0 K r7D d rD n p rD vi 7 3 r� r~ r~ n o o rD 3 v, o rD 0 �, r+ o o Z3 aoc :E, 6) S X-•< 3 0rD 7 ° (D n �, O an 0 X- s v O CL on) o 0 o o- ao W rD ag a Q rD r� 7 0 O a4 o rt o rr n 0 O r* L Q- 7 rD rD � O f+ i n O 3 z rD n 0 n 0 0 w It O r~ m O v 0 v, o o h C m O(� Q> (D z m v = A W W � O W N coCD `Z O i !-+ -.4 7 n to OC) (Q O 3 D =t C/) < cr �Zmf�n (D n D CD 0 D 0 C: CL o o 0 r-: o r W CD cn cu 7 CL CL O � (7 X 0 o_ cc F' c C m 3 v3 O m °1 CD 7 M. Quote 1015117527496.1 BALDWIN PARK POLICE Salesperson Quote Details Salesperson Name Quote Date Pau[Kastuk 08/03/2015 Salesperson Email Quote Validity Paul_Kastuk@Dell.com 09/02/2015 Salesperson Phone Solution ID 18009993355 Salesperson Extension 5130155 Price Summary Description Quantity Dell 19 Monitor - P19145 15 Not R C1 H9URSA !3LE-:. �-M rE 1041,. 6PLy PAY File, a�t Mcg N i tip- ASD 0►.X,: �,QrVlPC1 t�YZ ,y t%O n'lP� 7'ER OGC.eSSAlzl a4p"Wa-11'e a- o C.orVt?O►�LYM fisted on the invoice. Billing Details Company Name BALDWIN PARK POLICE Customer Number 47596416 Phone Number 1(909) 931-4312 Address 14403 PACIFIC AVE 1ST FL BALDWIN PARK US Unit Price Subtotal Price $135.36 $2,030.40 Subtotal $2,030.40 Tax $193.54 Shipping and Handling $120.00 Environmental Fee $60.00 Total $2,403.94 Page 1 0 2014 Del( Inc. U.S. only...........Inc. ......... el .. .. _ 6 _�_..... w only. Dell Inc. is located of One Del! Way, Moll Stop 8119, Round Rack, TX 78681. Dell Quote; 10 151175Z7496. 1 - 13ALDWIN PARK POLICE Soles Person: Paul Kastuk Dear Customer, Your quote is detailed below, please review the quote for product and information accuracy. If you find errors or desire changes, please contact me as soon as possible. Regards, Paul Kastuk Order this quote easily online through your P.remjer.pagp, or if you do not have Premier, using , ote to,_. Order Product Details Shipping Details Shipping Contact: Shipping Phone No: Shipping via: Shipping Address: RECV DEPT 1(626) 960-4011 Standard Ground 14403 PACIFIC AVE BALDWIN PARK CA 91706-4226 US Description Dell 19 Monitor - P1914S Estimated Delivery Date: 08/11/2015 Contract Code: WN99ABZ Customer Agreement No: WSCA B27160 857-BBBE Dell 19 Monitor - P19145 Product Price Details Subtotal Tax Shipping and Handling Environmental Fee Total Quantity 15 15 $2,030.40 $193.54 $120.00 $60.00 $2,403.94 Unit Price Subtotal Price $135.36 $2,030.40 be11 Inc. U.S."'onl . Dell Inc. Is located at One Dell Wa , Mail Stop 8129, around Rock � Y , TX 7`8682, �� State of California, California 9-1-1 Emergency Communications Office (9-1-1 Office) COMMITMENT TO FUND 9-1-1 EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES M-288 (Rev, 12106) This Form To Be Completed By The State 9-1-1 Office Only Public A9ency: Baldwin Park PD Contractor Name: Dell .__............ .._......... __. Address: 14403 Pacific Ave. Malling Address: City, State, Zip: Baldwin Park, CA 91706 _ City, State, Zip PSAP Manager: Elizabeth Perelda J Representative: E-mail WAdd ress: e�pro�r�i�1IirwMrr�� E -Mail Address: Phone Number: 626-960-1956 Phone Number: Fax Number: 626-338-5545 Fax Number: ..._. Type of Funding Request: ( ) 9-1-1 Equipment () 9-1-1 Network () Training ( ) 9-1-1 Education O County Coordinator Expense O 7 -Digit Phone Lines (, ) Maintenance Other: CPE Allotment Residual Spending Description of Equipment and Services to be funded: Dell is providing 5 Mapping PC's to Baldwin Park PD Note: Payment is required by the PSAP directly to vendors. A TD -290 claim must be submitted by the PSAP with copies of their proof of payment and vendor invoices in order to receive reimbursement. Purchase/Service Information: Include equipment or service description, quantity, part number, unit cost, installation cost, monthly cost, tax and total cost. Attach contractors quote or PSAP purchase order, where applicable. Service! Monthly Total Total Non- Descrlptfon Quantity Eqmt. ID# Unit Cost Installation Cost Recurring Coat Recurring cost _.... .- �..� Dell Mapping Computers (5) 1 7,149.25 - 7,149.25 Subtotal 7,149.25 Tax and Surcharge 458.53 TOTAL APPROVED $7,607.78 loop TD -288 expiration date: N/A Fiscal Year: 2015/2016 All invoices shall refer to tracking number: 18648 PSAP]Ob ect Code. 19051702.12 ..:..:.... The State of Callfornla's monetary obligation under this agreement In subsequent fiscal years is subject to, and contlnrent upon, v�allabllliy of funds In the State Emergency Telephone Account. Please be advised that this coal a" trnent to d oes not onstlt to_""/__ a binding purchase order agreement. R MM'EN D I A ROVAt BY Tele hone Number PPROVED t Date D9- 6-657-945M TTl50�N 818 DANA EAl'L i" Quote Summary_712605782 QUOTATION Quote #: Customer #: Contract #: CustomerAgreement #: Quote Date: Date: 8/3/2015 Customer Name: 712605782 142878503 70137 Dell Std Terms 0810312015 CA 911 EMER COMM OFFICE Thanks for choosing Dell! Your quote is detailed below; please review the quote for product and informational accuracy. If you find errors or desire certain changes please contact your sales professional as soon as possible. Sales Professional Information SALES REP: PAUL KASTUK PHONE: 1800 -4563355 Email Address: Paul K stuk .Pgl rq Phone Ext: 80000 GROUP: 1 QUANTITY: 5 SYSTEM PRICE: $1,258.79 GROUP TOTAL: $6,293.95 Description Quantity OptiPlex 9020 Small Form Factor (210-AATO) 5 8GS (2x4GB) 1600MHz DDR3 Non -ECC (370 -AAMC) 5 No Keyboard Selected (580-AABG) 5 No Monitor (480-ABHJ) 5 Bracket for Graphic Card for SFF, Dell OptiPlex 9020 (490-BBFS) 5 Dual 1G AMD Radeon R5-240 Graphics, w/DPandDVI Port, Low Profile (490-BCEX) 5 No Wireless (555-BBFO) 5 3.5 inch 50OGB 7200rpm Hard Disk Drive (400-AANO) 5 Windows 7 Professional English/French 64bit (Includes Windows 8.1 Pro license) (536- BBBJ) 5 US Order (332-1286) 5 OptiPlex 9020 Small Form Factor Chassis w/ up to 85 Percent Efficient PSU (Bronze V2) (329-BCKC) 5 No mouse selected on your OptiPlex system (570-AAAF) 5 No ESTAR (387-BBCG) 5 No Bcom required (555-BBKH) 5 8X DVD -ROM Drive (429-AADR) 5 Internal Dell Business Audio Speaker (520 -AARP) 5 No Wireless (555-BBFO) 5 System Power Cord (Philipine/TH/US) (450-AAOJ) 5 Windows 8.1 DVD OS Recovery(English) (620-AASU) 5 Dell Back-up and Recovery Manager for Windows 7, Multiple Language (637-AAAK) 5 No Quick Reference Guide (340-ABKW) 5 Microsoft Office Trial, MUI, OptiPlex, Precision, Latitude (630 -AARP) 5 Dell Limited Hardware Warranty Plus Service (997-6870) 5 ProSupport Plus: Accidental Damage Service, 3 Years (997-6939) 5 ProSupport Plus: Keep Your Hard Drive, 3 Years (997-6949) 5 ProSupport Plus: Next Business Day Onsite 3 Years (997-6959) 5 Page 1 of 4 file:///C:/Users/Elizabeth%20Pereida/AppData/LocaUMicrosoft/ Windows/Temporary%20In... 8/4/2015 ` Quote Sum►nary_712605782 ProSupport Plus: 7x24 Technical Support, 3 Years (997-6979) No Special BIOS Setup Required (696-BBBC) Intel vPro Technology Enabled (631-AABI) Dell 19 Monitor- P1914S without stand (857-BBBD) No Diagnostic/Recovery CD media (340-ABJI) No Quick Reference Guide (340-ABKW) NO ADAPTER (470-AAJL) Dell Digital Delivery Client (421-4047) Thank you for buying Dell (421-9982) Dell Data Protection System Tools Digital Delivery/DT (422-0008) Visit www.dell.com/encryption (632-BBBZ) Thank you for buying Dell (632-BBCB) Adobe Reader 11 (640-BBDF) Dell Data Protection I Protected Workspace (640-BBEV) Enable Low Power Mode (658-BBMQ) Dell Client System (658-BBMT) Waves Maxx Audio (658-BBNH) NO RAID (817-BBBN) No Anti -Virus software (650-AAHJ) Intel Core i7-4790 Processor (Quad Core, 3.6GHz, 8MB Cache, w/HD Graphics 4600) (338-BFIK) Dell Data Protection Encryption Personal Edition Digital Delivery (421-9984) Dell ProSupp.ort for Software, Dell Data Protection Encryption Personal Edition, 1 Year (954-3455) Chassis Intrusion Switch (461"-AAAX) No Intel Responsive (551-BBBJ) Small Form Factor Chassis Mainstream Heatsink (95watts) (412-AABM) SHIP MTL,SYSM,OptiPlex SFF (340-ACGR) PowerDVD Software not included (429=AAGQ) Thank You for Choosing Dell (340-ADBJ) Thank You for Choosing Dell (340-ADBJ) Regulatory Label,9020SFF, Mexico (389-BCDL) No Add On Card (382-BBBZ) Intel Core 17 vPro Label (389-BBWO) State Environmental Fee for display 15 inches, less than 35 inches (600-0277) SOFTWARE & ACCESSORIES Product Microsoft Sculpt Ergonomic Desktop - Keyboard, mouse and numeric pad set - 2.4 GHz - English - North American layout (A7151160) C2G DVI -I M/M Single Link Digital/Analog Video Cable - Display cable - DVI -I (M) - DVI -I (M) - 6.6 ft - black (A0489026) GROUP TOTAL: $855.30 Quantity Unit Price 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Total 5 $109.99 $549.95 10 $8.89 $88.90 ; file:///C:/Users/Elizabeth%o20Yereida/AppData/LocallMicrosofi/Windows/Temporary%o20In... 8/4/2015 Quote Summary_712605782 Dell Stereo USB Monitor Soundbar AC511 (318-2885) C2G DVI -D Dual Link Digital Video Cable - DVI cable - dual link - DVI -D (M) - DVI -D (M) - 3.3 ft - black (A6875521) *Total Purchase Price: Product Subtotal: Tax: Shipping & Handling: State Environmental Fee: Shipping Method: Page 3 of 4 5 $27.29 $136.45 10 $8.00 $80.00 $7,607.78 $7,129.25 $458.53 $0.00 $20.00 LTL 5 DAY OR LESS (* Amount denoted in $) Order this quote easily online through your ii i. p@A% or if you do not have Premier, using e rrtro8-e.. p Order Statement of Conditions The information in this document is believed to be accurate. However, Dell assumes no responsibility for inaccuracies, errors, or omissions, and shall not be liable for direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages resulting from any such error or omission, tell is not responsible for pricing or other errors, and reserves the right to cancel orders arising from such errors. Dell may make changes to this proposal including changes or updates to the products and services described, including pricing, without notice or obligation, Terms of Sale This quote is valid for 30 days unless otherwise stated. Unless you have a separate written agreement that specifically applies to this order, your order will be subject to :and governed by the following agreements„ each of which are incorporated herein by reference and available in hardcopy from Dell at your request: If this purchase is for your internal use only: Dell's Commercial Terms of Sale (v dcVd,rarr7l"T), which incorporate Dell's U.S. Return Policy wwwdell rorrrdrrtrriIpy and Warranty If this purchase is intended for resale: Dell's Reseller Terms of Sale (www,dell.comdresellerterms). If this purchase includes services: in addition to the foregoing applicable terms, Dell's Service Terms ( drabcoo�JserviecrttractsFgdtzl) If this purchase includes software: In addition to the foregoing applicable terms,, your use of the software is subject to the license terms accompanying the software, and in the absence of such terns, then use of the Cell -branded application software is subject to the Dell End User License Agreement -- Type A (ww+m scall and use of the Dell branded system software is subject to the Dell End' User License Agreement - Type S ( rt' : I,aj -. Lr" ). You acknowledge having read and agree to be bound by the foregoing applicable terms in their' entirety. Any terms and conditions set forth in your purchase order or any other correspondence that are in addition to, inconsistent or in conflict with, the foregoing applicable online terms wilt be of no force or effect unless specifically agreed to in a writing signed by Feil that expressly references such terms. y department, agency, tourers Additional Terms for Public g Cu Y Y If � you are a d'ep division, or office of an district, state, county or municipal government within the United States ("Public Customer"), the following terrns ("Public Customer Terms") apply in addition to the foregoing terms: A. if any portion of the foregoing tenors and conditions (or any terms referenced therein) is prohibited by law" such portion shall not apply to you. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, the End User License Agreements shall take precedence in all conflicts relevant to your use of any software S. By placing your order„ you confirm that (1) you are a contracting officer or other authorized representative of Public Customer with authority to bind the Public Customer to these terms and conditions, and (2) you have read and agree to be bound by these terms and conditions. Pricing, Taxes, and Additional Information All product, pricing„ and other information is valid for U.S. customers and U.S. addresses only, and is file:///C:/UserslElizabeth%20Pereida/AppDatalLocal/Microsoft/W indows/Temporary%20ln... 8/4/2015 PHONE SUPPLEMEN'.1"S 1259 N. TUSTIN AVE. ANAHEIM CA 92807 (714) 632-3838 CUST 4: 01-0034369 SOLD TO: BALDWIN PARK POLICE DEPT 1.4403 8. PACIFIC AVE. ATTN: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 Customer P.D. Ship VIA quote FED EX GRD ITEM NO, 33ZISEE�� ORDER NUMBER: S123931 ORDER DATE: 8/13/2015 PRBC BY, RD UPDATED BY;RD SALESPERSON Z 0001 NAME: PS Hse SHIP TO, BALDWIN PARK POLICE DEPT. 14403 E, PACIFIC AVENUE ATTIN. LIZ PEREIDA DESPATCH SUPERVISOR BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 EFFECTIVE TOS 8/31/2015 H141N Duoget Convert. HS W/ NC H171N DuoPro Conv Noise Cancelling H8 1N Tristar w/Qr) & 14C 62800-01 Neck Band 'Duo Pro/Set 43937-01 Duoset/CS50 Ear Cushions, 1 pr SHIPPING COST IS ESTIMATED vEw4jEF-v&qr,-p Terms NET 30 QTY QUOTED 5 5 3 PRICE AMOUNT 60.95 304.75 77.05 385.25 80.50 80.50 11.50 57.,50 2.20 6,60 NET ORDER: 934.60 FREIGHT� 20.00 SALES TAX: 75.11 ORDER TOTAL: 929.71 M m X •DC7 V ny N v�•� N Z ma �1D 00 Z = (A ((n J m = v 9sv � rxm tn�� rnm N O O w o 2&N= u, 0 A 7 Y n:3 O_ w O' Fn -v �-0 J j (o 0 NIV C° . � 717 Q O, (D D Gt U (D ( n n 0 O Df N O 0 - (D go Q' (D a � � Z. J 3 3 5�o (D o 00)� Q OQ C7 d N 7 in v m CD O w o c Q- N 0 vz! (D 0w 0 o c v ai w v Q c C1 ID Q C N N N N fD a 0 3 (D Z N (D N 3 Q (D C (D n C: 071 O onn G O N � Q N Q Q Q .n+ 7ni oQ O Q °a O '0 Qn. O Win, O n 7 7 Q Q n Q D n O Q � � O O rt 0 N O0. O nc m n Q n p n � X 0 X C 0 C, o Q o O i// L! 4,q (/► -64 in Oo Go -O 'O g O O10 OP O O o M u M m X 0 m a ny N 00 m Z ma �1D 00 Z vZO rn m = v DDZ (mA0m � rxm tn�� rnm O NNQ AN O_ (Q p K O o o 2&N= u, 0 A 7 Y g W(D (D O w O' Fn -v �-0 J j (o C" (nQ Q Q p NIV C° . � 717 Q O, (D D Gt U U7 Ln ( n n 0 O D <0 'O 3 (D v o (D m a � � 0 3 m u M n m 0 m a ny N m Z ma �1D 00 rn 2 G 30 ' m P X m m N r D > CT 0, 0, )n 6.3O _ S. .%O A O �05G (Q p K O o o 2&N= u, 0 A 7 Y v o A C v O 6 N (Ai, to o Q ® 6 of (p W W Q O, (D n O O cn 3 O 3 -v M O mmM m Z < m m Zk 0 ^0� l / C 1 G C) ^rt = rn C) 01) �• o Ul • 1 O o m 1, F OD OWN, (D Oo 00 co 'i o c O o � S 0 20 A Q � Q T C 3 XCP Vi 6 a W N (�o D oo ,o O '0 a �1 3 N v y co m = o c (D c a n o Q a ro (D a 0 Q �(D 03 ° Q_ c 5-3 O Q Q c w, a O ° ;v (D (D Q (D n .Q � ne 33 (D -6 O � 70 o O Q a :� 05. c (D co Q (D (D - n ® O (D 3 O Q Z O � = O Q OQQ Q O O o 0 3 Oro Q C Z ° 3 S U O 7a n (D C P n Q wn O O C W w Q Q _ � w ro O a Q C O O ® 3 a O � � (D Z (D C ° 3 Q (D Q Qa O O � Q n - O n 4 �(� �tCX (DW n n c n0 0 D : 3 O a Q CR a a (D 0 ° n ®_ (D O O m o >� > 3 s (D < c Q < �. Q W a row® Q�Q Q QQ D- n(D O C Q; (D n m m O O C cQ Q- (0 O�a O� 0 ® < ° ro Z 3 w O c, romQ < nom° - (D ® O < 3 0 Q Q (Q Z n O Q w �° O Q 3 n w C a n (D (Q a (D ro 3 0-0 0-0-6 kJ c C O Q Nro Q Q ° (Q a 30 �s a ° n m " s o : v o(�; OO Q O — - Z 00 (D(D Q < O. n (D D c Q Q a 3 3 a O c C w» O_ (D w ro Q Q w w O C 6(o ° a 3 0 3 ° w 3 n ro Q ii d .Q C Q _0 O w O (D O -O Q Q a 3 a % O O <@ ® O O (D Q CD Q m (Q Q ,Q o w n -n c c w (D CD O_ S :7 w n Q Q Q O 7;- CN a 3' N a so (D 9.0 (D dD L a C 3 n (D ro 0- (D O w C < < (D 5. Q Q n Q Q Z (D C Q O (D Q ZS (D Q Q O ° C ® C (D O a O 5 O O 7 _J a T O C) @ G @ C ❑ 3 ra @ O n @ @ Q :5r P Q w❑ :::k w @ O C 3 Q n � Q @ ° :3 o 3 Q @ — Q = Q Q C C Q @ I n (D@ oO 3 C: c ° @ d a _ (1% Q O w 0 Q C; < Q Q ��•@_ r1Q-( Q c O 0- 0 O @ @ 3 - Q N ❑ Q (D° c Q n �' Q (D K :q @ n d cQ Q Q w C O @ 4 y i w° _ (T 3 Q W 1 C) @ Q Q- w i Q n Q I Q ° O I l O O + O @ @ C w G (D Q_ ❑ D- Q @ C ❑ Q O Q- J Q G ? o @ @ O �_ 3 ° G Q @ cc)Q Q Q @ w Q Q Q C ❑ 6 Q Q 3 Q C ❑ G Q -O o ❑ C Q C--0 Q. ® T n C n !G @ C O @ ° ❑ O CD Q '^ n Q Q 3 w O Q Z @ @ W n a @ ° o o Q 5 o C 3 ° ( ❑ : n Q Q_ o a CD ®c 0 :3o Q Q ®� g Q n n o (D� Q ❑ CDQ ° o o Q roOL � ° w @ _ ❑. CD Z ® C 0 0 ro fl fs w n @ ❑ @ w n (m Q Q � 0 (D o ° 0- 0 o a @ Q cD Q. � 0 Q w ®Q o cu _, n lQ Q 3 ez 5. c Z3 `n ° (Q w ® w w Q W ❑ (D❑ @ m m ❑� C�• n an `G� O cn n Q O @ Q. O @ = Q n o e ® o w �u C ®� T O K W 33 o :(7D L - Q Q w Ti @ 0 ®1 QZ Ch FY1 ° C n 3 04 ® @ w mZ ` _ 3 O @ ❑ n @ O 0- 0 O @ ° Q- �' Q (D n d cQ Q 3 2 ❑ in j @ n00m O Lin • Q- 3 w 11 (/) C) O (D ® 3 O (/9 ® @ w w Q n Q Q d @ 3 Q V Q C Q O :3 ',,.. Q Q @ ® ro (D D @ @ n @ �F @ n O a a Q ° O c 3 a Q Q_ @ C � n n (D� Q n a � ° C n O n @ Q a @ o O o n 717 a @ a � O @ Q_ (Q @ o 3 o @ Q @ @ °(Doa �CC> Wo 3 .. Q @ COW o-:� (D(A n O �, 7 0 Q Q(n Q Q' C: Q 3 w x 4 6cn0 a Q N n Q @ ®a �� () 00 0 0 N a O (n C,) (�D S n fp O o v 0 m � m d? O D) O r•► O J Z 1. 3 r° o 0 O w iDoC') 7 n 3 2. o m w � � � d c y. 0) pp a N v� N W O 1 v; CL o0 c a CD Q rn 01 (D CL O S (7D Z, N (D 4A -6% An AC\nc\n J \ W \ J \ c Cn CCD C.Cl) n 2 CD r. UV ;2 O O FA, 0- o O.0 .= O = O co ;:vm o y(D 3 0-0 0:3 n �.CA n CO CD X K3 o =_ < 3 CD W O .d ! O CD CD CD O �CDC00 wCD Cn ' O Q O � .C• 0 �F Cn t� :(1 'w (D O = < �.am y N (D w (n p 7 O Vl :o C .. = O w a to Cp O N CD Zr N. O CD N .= . n j C CD m 'CL a. 7 CD. 7 =r (o (D 03 0 C d O n =• O _ N 0 CD Tn !D A N W N-cs) W %. m r w . .'C D 0 r EM 0 004 m x v Z 0 3„p ,A„D3 DXm(yi!0im N N Q A N O WD Q. c" Q O a w00 wm d w�5'mLD. 5 (60 v, v, Q Q Q Q Ln -4. 7c -ri n n O D < n O(DCD v �w o CD O- 3 00 01 to O C�� Vt U'1 CTI M Z n 7d CTI'. O m r� m al -0z -0 v rXmm Pm NaWIT Q & 5,a N Q NNn 3 Q (D C) u, r -0 A (D n Q n0 x+ O �Q ( w w O n o o `" CD a n a o 3 O 2F O LA CD• O Q -n fl Q (D C Q O 0 0 O QQn CO Q= O$ in CD j O 4A -6% An AC\nc\n J \ W \ J \ c Cn CCD C.Cl) n 2 CD r. UV ;2 O O FA, 0- o O.0 .= O = O co ;:vm o y(D 3 0-0 0:3 n �.CA n CO CD X K3 o =_ < 3 CD W O .d ! O CD CD CD O �CDC00 wCD Cn ' O Q O � .C• 0 �F Cn t� :(1 'w (D O = < �.am y N (D w (n p 7 O Vl :o C .. = O w a to Cp O N CD Zr N. O CD N .= . n j C CD m 'CL a. 7 CD. 7 =r (o (D 03 0 C d O n =• O _ N 0 CD Tn !D A N W N-cs) W %. m r w . .'C D 0 r EM 0 004 m x v Z 0 3„p ,A„D3 DXm(yi!0im N N Q A N O WD Q. c" Q O a w00 wm d w�5'mLD. 5 (60 v, v, Q Q Q Q Ln -4. 7c -ri n n O D < n O(DCD v �w o CD O- 3 00 01 to O C�� Vt U'1 CTI M Z n 7d CTI'. O m r� m al -0z -0 v rXmm Pm NaWIT Q & 5,a Q Z;::ELOa Q NNn �N�pG u, o uao Do a 2 -0 A C � ;Q Q x+ 6 PO ( w w O. m n o o `" 3 0 3 J J V V co CD V V .a pp cor; rn 0 n Z y O 30-4 m Z * ((D 00 00 SWC O � 7 N o A ? Q T c Q 3 N x 6Ln O N an n (DD -o 00 0D O `O O` 3 N a (D -a5> o0 c ° O K7 O O N ( nr (D O nQ n ro C' o n z� ®° ® n - Q ro 0 3 a n (D � Q n °(o c � 3 o' � n 3 QCw Z ® ° ° ®®� ® Q �� Q Q 7 6 Q n(D • 0 m ro 3 0 n CD Q o C) � c 6 ° ro •� a a m = CD 70%C Q ° a° w< 3 (D® a• � O V p w a n (D ro Q (D H µ Q Q O N° Q ° ° n O=_ (D a (D=o (D° a r g @ w Q n CL • • no- o • o -0 m m 3 o ° n ° o 3< 0 6 0 Q Q a Q c Q 0 6 n 3 • a ® O Q cD ® C Q Q `o -a n c n @ (D ° o CL (D c n CL® ® 3 3 w O C a Q O `a ou n D O � O ° 5 o < 3 y C Q Q O C a� a m ®® ® w (D 3 ® Q ` Q ° o cnD ® - a ® (Da a o ° Q. n CD (D CD ®® =' ® n O m a a- D n a r o � w (D n n ° 0 - r CD ro °- ® co PL ro N n o (D cn'n ®5 • • 5 ° t0 n H w (D° ° CD m n� c a 5' n � Q - :-T° CD 0 � c4 Q n O (D Q O O a O (D =� c ® 09 CD • o cD r • •* • r • • • r • ' . r • • • • • 7 r • 0 � F • • . . s • ,, Q 60s r • • • • • ' • • • • • r � • • '' 0CD • � ,' , r • f r n 77 • • • • • • r • • D • • r • • r • CD • • • • r • D • 0 CD• • r COCD CO CO 6 • • 1 ". "•• z ro w 0 0- Q Q m s 3 ro 0 0' ro Q_ Q ro I v,b (/)--Q O c @ c oo (D 73, O3 o �l a c (-DcQ c o Q Q n c o ® ro rn Q @ n n 3 Q n c @ n. 3 o :5 -0 (D o O Q Q `2 (D (a Q C 5 - 5.ro O n n o Q o : Qo' O 5' _ OD �(0 ° o Q 0 ro� c O �3 Oro Q 7- 5-6 O 037 n (D c 0 n p 0 o c w N Q n = 3 .Q @ (D(D Q- Q- c 0 Q = ° O o O @ ro z 6 C ® 3 Q @ Q @ Q Qa o' o � g n - ro n ::ELD70 0 cD ou 00n c n o m n Q o CK 00-N6 a @ o <• Q n . (D o. a 70 D O > Q > Q� spas" C) CD �`a o Q ro CO Q g. Q o o D- Qo - o' Kv v Q- a4 0 � O (*o < o z3 _. O mroQ c� 6 n @ ma a a Q (D<' o v c(Q @ nc ~ m Q w 0 Q 3 n N c c�Qe Q — �o• 0 ( -cQ Q O ro Q cl pc c n 3�- m°Q °ro (Q0 9L x•30 (D (D @ m ' LOc 0 oe @ n O o CQ. 0O @ CDD O n �° -:RQ @ cQ QQ- ®3 3 :3 - c Q- c ° m p Q @ n -a® (Df4 ®(Q (CD 3 Q @ 3 -D, ° 0 ca ° m 3 c) ° <° �. Q r � @ y Q 0 ro CD Q (D n Q ro (Q ° Q o n N` @ � w @ Q Q O n Q :3 Q" 3CL _ M ro Q "-,,.0 c CD � s a 3 n @ (Da ?� 5° <' <ro �. Q n Q Q Q.� Q o�<Z o Qa N' n Q3 (D Q.. 0 Q �- ° (D Q c Q 0 rn 5 0 a @ @ (D CC) WAI w 'p 00 w o < 0 o o 0 AQ C Q � X «� Q N ' (D ''o > co N O 0' 3 a i o°' Solutions Overview Created by: Jonathan Verville Date: March 18, 2014 Revision: 2.0 Baldwin Park March 18, 2014 1 1. BACKGROUND Baldwin Park PD is a Primary PSAP which currently operates a five (5) -position call center in Baldwin Park, CA. Baldwin Park currently uses Cassidian's VESTA Pallas 9-1-1 call taking application. 2. OPPORTUNITY Carousel Industries is proposng the Cassidian Communications VESTAO 4 call processing solution. The system will be deployed in a Standalone/Geo-Diverse/Multi-SiteGeo-Diverse topology. In a standalone deployment all of the VESTA equipment will be deployed in a single backroom with local call -taking consoles and IP phones. Additionally, Carousel Industries is proposing the following solutions and services: • CommandPOST'", optional • IP Phone Set, optional • Aurora® LITE MIS, optional • Remote Support and Managed Services, optional • Installation and Training Baldwin Park March 18, 2014 3. SOLUTION 3.1 VESTA°/SENTINEL° 4 The VESTA 4 (Rel 2) call processing solution is a mission -critical call management and response solution that is a NENA compliant, IETF standards-based, IP -centric implementation. VESTA 4 is a 9-1-1 ANI/ALI controller providing voice management and data (ALI) retrieval. The VESTA 4 solution supports all of the standard telephony interfaces to simplify integration into existing telephony networks. The VESTA 4 call processing solution is engineered to ensure that there is essentially no single point of failure; in this regard most hardware is duplicated within the system to ensure redundancy. General hardware components for a VESTA 4 system are as follows: • Two (2) virtualized server instances running Media Distribution Services (MDS) • Two (2) virtualized server instances running Data Distribution Services (DDS) • Two (2) or more FXS (Foreign eXchange Subscriber) gateways • Two (2) or more FXO (Foreign eXchange Office) gateways • Two (2) or more managed Ethernet switches • One (1) firewall security appliance with VPN capability • One (1) master clock that supports NTP v3 • VESTA 4 workstations • IP Administrative telephones (optional) Supported interfaces include: • Analog 9-1-1 CAMA (wireline and wireless) trunks used only for incoming emergency calls • Administrative lines — Centrex, CLID, POTS • Feature Group D (FGD) • Ringdown lines: wet (battery provided by CO) and dry (battery seen by the CO) • Digital interfaces: T1 and PRI • Automatic Location Identification (ALI) to identify caller information • CAD interface • VoIP 9-1-1 interfaces using NENA 13 or Intrado RFAI protocol 3.1.1 SERVERS Carousel Industries will provide two (2) HP ML310e Gen 8 servers for the VESTA 4 solution. Each server will be covered by a HP 5 year, 247, 4 hour response uplift warranty. Server (Virtualized) Specifications (default) 'M' W66 Gent Single CPU, 4U Tower 8GB RAM, dual HD, Power & NIC IVIL350p Gen 8 Single CPU, 10U Tower or Baldwin Park Sizing Annual Call Optimal Deployment Volume 1-10 positions cWblI iri le Baekw° adink Small Build V! a li d Aurora 5-160 positions 100K -1M Single Backroom, Geo -Diverse; March 18, 2014 3 5U Racked 8GB RAM, dual Medium to HD, Power & NIC Large Build DL380p Gen 8 Single CPU*, 5-250 positions 2U Racked 8G6 RAM, dual Medium to Very HD, Power & NIC Large Build (*Very Large has dual CPU) Virtualized Aurora Or Standalone Aurora 100K -2M Single Backroom, Geo -Diverse, Multi -Site; Standalone Aurora VIRTUALIZATION The VESTA 4 backroom design operates on two (2) physical servers. These servers, known as Side A and Side B run in a hot standby arrangement where if one fails the other immediately takes over. They are also equipped with Virtual Machine technology that supports virtual server instances. Within each server, resides a virtual Media Distribution Service instance and a Data Distribution Service instance. Each MDS and DDS virtual pair for side A and side B, operate in a hot standby configuration and their functional operation is described below. Because of the architecture of virtualized servers there will be a terminal screen and KVM that may be shared with other servers in the work space of the VESTA 4 system. This interface can only access the Hypervisor software that resides on the physical servers, side A and B. Access to the virtualized servers, MDS and DDS, within each virtual server side A or side B will be by a dedicated HP z220 SFF workstation console. MDS The VESTA 4 Media Distribution Services are the software -based call -processing component of the VESTA 4 solution that operates on Linux CentOS. The software extends telephony features and functions to packet telephony network devices such as VESTA 4 consoles and IP phones. • Support for 911 and Admin queues • ACD schemes: longest idle, ring all, circular, and linear • Conferencing, transfer, and call overflow capabilities • Administrative phone features and services • Auto attendant features • Voice mail DDS The VESTA 4 Data Distribution Service, which operates on Windows 2008 Server OS, provides advanced 9-1-1 call data handling and system monitoring services: • Retrieve and extract ALI from ALI databases, perform ALI rebids • Interfaces to CAD (Computer Aided Dispatch) systems • Manages the transfer of call details to remote agencies • System activity events and logs for tracking, alarming and historical reporting • Management of overall system resources • A client applications software distribution mechanism for VESTA 4 9-1-1 consoles, Aurora" MIS solution, and/or Activity View management application • Real-time CDR (Call Detail Record) printing Baldwin Park March 18, 2014 4 3.1.2 VESTA CONSOLE The VESTA console User Interface (UI) provides the call -taker with access to the dispatch functions within the VESTA 4 solution for 9-1-1 call handling. The VESTA 4 consoles will be used to answer, transfer and conference all 911 as well as non -emergency calls. Carousel Industries will provide five (5) Windows 7 HP z220 SFF (Small Form Factor) workstations for all VESTA 4 consoles. Additional hardware and software that will be included with each console is as follows: • Dual Video Card and single Network Interface Card (NIC) for VESTA LAN • One (1) 20" dedicated, flat -panel wide screen LCD Monitor for the VESTA 4 UI • One (1) Sound Arbitration Module (SAM) and external speaker kit • One (1) Genovation 35 Button Keypad with 12' cable • One (1) 4 -port KVM switch, optional • Xx' extension cables for SAM, KVM, and Genovation Keypad • One (1) Aurora LITE data collection license • One (1) dual channel Instant Recall Recorder license • HP 5 year, 247 4 hour response time uplift warranty 3.1.3 VESTA 4 COMMANDPOSTTM_ OPTIONAL The VESTA 4 CommandPOST TM call processing solution is a portable call -taking position designed to allow a call -taker to move to another location, reconnect to their host system, and begin taking 9-1-1 (with ANI/ALI) and administrative calls. All features of the traditional VESTA 4 console are persevered with this mobile solution. A Sound Arbitration Module (SAM) is required In order to use Instant Recall Recording (IRR) feature with the VESTA 4 CommandPOST. The CommandPOST call processing solution can connect to the host system via: • Public Internet connection using VPN • Private IP network with/without VPN connection • IP satellite network with/without VPN connection Carousel Industries will provide one (1) CommandPOST unit as an option. Each unit will contain the following hardware and software: • One (1) HP8570P Windows 7 Laptop computer • One (1) advanced docking station with a mouse and keyboard • One (1) 20" dedicated, flat -panel wide screen LCD Monitor • One (1) Sound Arbitration Module (SAM) and external speaker kit • One (1) Genovation 24 Button Keypad with 12' cable • One (1) Aurora LITE data collection license • One (1) dual channel Instant Recall Recorder license • HP 5 year, 9x5 NBD response time uplift warranty • One (1) 9 -cell 73Whr or 100Whr extended life battery, optional Baldwin Park March 18, 2014 5 3.1.4 SIP PHONES -OPTIONAL The VESTA 4 solution can support SIP phone endpoints with either Basic or Enhanced phone features.. The Basic IP Phone license supports: • A single line appearance that can be used to receive direct incoming calls or place outgoing calls • Call Forward, Transfer, and 3 -way conference • Call waiting and Call timer • Caller and calling line information • Do Not Disturb and Missed Call Notification • A maximum of three (3) expansion modules that can only be used for speed dials The Enhanced IP Phone license supports: • Features included with the Basic IP Phone license • Up to sixty (60) shared call appearances (call pickup on trunks and lines) • A maximum of three (3) expansion modules that can be programmed to display either shared call appearances or speed dials • Login to a ACD queue with Ready/Not Ready capability • Display ALI on 9-1-1 calls • Local Hold, Conference, Transfer to Console or Phone • Transfer to Queue Carousel Industries has NOT quoted SIP Phones at this time. Each SIP Phone usually includes the following hardware and licensing: • One (1) Aastra 67571 IP Phone set with AC adapter • X(x) Aastra M675i expansion modules • One (1) Basic/Enhanced IP Phone license 3.1.5 GATEWAYS The VESTA 4 call processing solution supports various gateways to interface to traditional (non -IP) telephone systems. Gateways convert non-VOIP circuits to standard, SIP -based VolP. MEDIANT 1000 (M1000) Mediant 1000 gateways provides a modular chassis with six (6) expansion slots that can be equipped with any combination of FXO, FXS and/or T1/PRI interface modules. The Mediant 1000 is also equipped with redundant power supplies and dual network interfaces (NICs). FOREIGN EXCHANGE SUBSCRIBER (FXS) The FXS gateway will support 4- ports in either a modular or standalone design with the following interfaces: • 2 -wire CAMA 9-1-1 trunks • "Dry" ring -down circuits • Analog stations • FAX machines/modems Baldwin Park March 18, 2014 0 FOREIGN EXCHANGE OFFICE (FXO) The FXO gateway will support 4- ports in either a modular or standalone design with the following interfaces: • Loop -start CO lines • Ground -start CO lines (Cisco gateways ONLY) • "Wet" ring -down circuits • Direct Inward Dialing (DID) circuits to specific endpoints (phone sets) • Web -based GUI for configuration Carousel Industries will provide: • Two (2) Mediant 1000 Gateway Chasses • Two (2) FXS 4 -port modules that will be diversified across each chassis • Four (4) FXO 4 -port modules that will be diversified across each chassis • No T1/PRI 2 span modules have been quoted at this time 3.1.6 LAN SWITCHES Two (2) HP 2620 24 port managed Ethernet LAN switches will be provided as the core switching backbone for the VESTA 4 solution. (Additionally the switches will interface with WAN carrier provided equipment, via an Ethernet interface, in Geo -Diverse and Multi -site deployments.) 3.1.7 CAD PORT SERVERS Digi TS -4 RS -232 -to -IP devices are deployed to extend serial CAD ports from the virtualized DDS server to local and remote locations. These devices provide the following features: • 4 RS -232 ports per unit • Each unit may communicate with multiple DDS virtual server instance • Web -based GUI for configuration Carousel Industries will provide: • One (1) TS -4 per physical server at the host location For each PSAP equipped with a CAD interface, one set of the following will also be provided to allow for CAD port redundancy: • Blackbox TL601A-R2 port data sharer • Blackbox TL158A-R4 data sharing unit that provides up to 4 RS -232 ALI spills that can be used for CAD, standalone Map, customer Digital Logging Recorder (DLR), etc. 3.1.8 NETCLOCK The VESTA 4 call processing solution requires a dedicated Network Time Protocol (NTP) v3 port to ensure all devises remain synchronized on the LAN. Carousel Industries will be providing the following Master Clock solution: • One (1) Master Netclock 9483 One (1) GPS/GNSS Outdoor Antenna • One (1) Antenna Mounting Kit Baldwin Park March 18, 2014 7 • One (1) Antenna Surge Protector • One (1) Grounding Kit • One (1) 100' cable from the antenna to the to surge protector • One (1) 50' cable from the surge protector to the 9483 Master Clock. 3.1.9 SYSTEM ENCLOSURE The VESTA 4 system will be provided in one (1) standard, 19" 42U two -post data rack. Additionally the following peripheral equipment will be included in the rack: • Two (2) 20 amp 120v vertical PDUs that require a standard 5-20R input receptacle (or L5 -20R) • One (1) 17" flat panel monitor • One (1) 4 -port KVM switch with four (4) 10' USB cables 3.2 DATA MANAGEMENT 3.2.1 AURORA 2.2 The Aurora MIS solution is the Cassidian Communications next -generation Management Information System (MIS). Aurora expands on the role of the MIS, becoming a comprehensive management platform with Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and other sophisticated ACD & data warehousing reporting capabilities. A record of each incoming and outgoing VESTA 4 call will be contained within the Aurora database. At a minimum, the records contain the following information: • Seize Time • Answer Time • Transfer Time • Hang-up (disconnect) time • Position number • Agent • Incoming number (ANI) • Date/time • ALI • ANI log of disconnected calls showing arrival time and disconnected party abandonment time. Microsoft Internet Explorer v. 6.0 or later is required to run the browser interface to the Aurora MIS solution. Microsoft .Net support libraries v. 2.0 or higher are also required on the workstation accessing the Aurora MIS system. The Aurora MIS solution is available in several configurations based on the customer PSAP requirements: AURORA LITE is a virtualized MIS software application for Small PSAPs with lower annual call volumes. Aurora LITE will be cohabitated on the DDS B server. The following customer requirements were considered in this configuration: • Customer receives approx. cxx,xxk calls of all types per year • Customer has a xic year on-line data retention policy Baldwin Park March 18, 2014 0 * Data beyond this point must be periodically archived by Baldwin Park or Carousel. Based on the above consideration, the following server hardware has been specified for this solution; A virtualized instance on DDS B 3.2.1.1 AURORA 2.2 OPTIONS Aurora MIS offers several software enhancements, Aurora Advanced Reporting bundle and Aurora Analytics. The Advanced Reporting bundle provides administrators in larger centers the option to build customized or ad-hoc reports that are not available in the standard Aurora package, while the Analytics module offers a data mining capability for dashboard presentation of complex MIS data in logical formats. Aurora Lite does not accommodate the Advanced or Analytics bundles. 3.2.1.2 AURORA 2.2 CLIENT No dedicated client software is required to access the Aurora MIS system. All access is performed using the Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0 or later browser. The workstation accessing the Aurora MIS system must: • Have Microsoft .Net 2.0 or later software libraries installed • Be connected to the same network as the Aurora server or have other dedicated, secure access to the Aurora MIS server network (VPN, etc) Aurora access licenses are "concurrent usage" licenses. Users may log into the system from any workstation connected to the network as long as the number of users concurrently logged in do not exceed the number of access licenses purchased. Carousel Industries will provide: • One (1) Aurora access license 3.2.2 ACTIVITY VIEWTM - OPTIONAL The Activity View management application provides real-time monitoring of PSAP activities. Activity View management application may be configured by the user to display the status of: • Call taker status • Group status • Group ACD status • Incoming trunks • Administrative lines • Active calls A user may also configure custom message colors and set a variety of thresholds which will trigger color changes. The Display Panel feature allows a user to configure a display output that is compatible with large screen (wall - mount) monitors and/or projectors. The Activity View management application can also display up to five (5) marquee messages to inform call -takers of upcoming events. Baldwin Park March 18, 2014 9 The Activity View management application may be installed on call -taker workstations with the VESTA 4 call processing solution, or on a stand-alone workstation. Carousel Industries has NOT quoted Activity View licenses at this time. 3.3 MANAGED SERVICES Managed Services (MS) is an on-line system designed to deliver an array of 24-hour remote monitoring and maintenance services to the PSAP via a combination of Internet Protocol (IP) and industry standard messaging. MS are an important part of a holistic security program and help provide many necessary security countermeasures to increase overall PSAP availability. Carousel Industries can offer the following Cassidian Managed Services: • Remote Monitoring & Response • Patch Management • Anti -Virus SW updates Carousel Industries will provide the Security Management offer which covers Patch Management & Anti -Virus SW updates only, for One (1) Year. Carousel Industries will provide two (2) Fortinet Fortigate firewall appliances for remote technical support and Monitoring & Response access. 3.4 INSTALLATION AND TRAINING Carousel Industries will provide installation and Project management for all equipment and services listed in this proposal. There are numerous Cassidian and Carousel Industries training programs available to customers for learning about their new NG9-1-1 platforms. Classes are normally held on-site at customer locations and the curriculum is customized for each PSAP, with the following types of instructor -led classes available: VESTA 4 Agent training (direct), 2 classes of 8 students (4 hrs) quoted VESTA 4 Agent Train the Trainer (indirect, larger PSAPs) not quoted VESTA 4 Administration, 1 class of 8 students (12 hrs) quoted Aurora Lite MIS Onsite (Supervisors, Administrators), 1 class of 8 students (2 hrs) quoted Baldwin Park March 18, 2014 10 3.5 PRICING SUMMARY Carousel Recommended System Proposal (includes Aurora and Remote Monitoring 5 Position Turnkey VESTA 4.X as outlined Above $ 2.55,259.84 Aurora MIS Reporting Package, Installation and Trainin with Tax Included $ 11,086.97 5 Year Enhanced Proactive/Pre-Emptive Remote System Monitoring $ 64,560.00 System Total with All Options, Remote Monitoring, Patch Management& Anti Virus Protection $330,906.81 Baldwin Park March 18, 2014 11 3.6 BILL OF MATERIALS Cassidian Communications VESTA 4 System Baldwin Park March 18, 2014 12 Cassidian Communications VESTA 4 System vvv 2 870899-00104.2 VESTA 4 R2 LIC AND MEDIA 2 873099-03002 R4 CAD INTF LIC VM Small Server Bundle 1 853031-MLSSVRSGL V -ML SVR BNDL SML SGL .www ....... � 2 04000-68009 V -SVR BASIC SPT SYR Cassidian Communications VESTA 4 Licenses 5 870899-00360U VESTA 4 SEAT UPGD LIC 5 809800-35094 R4 SW SPT SYR Workstation Equipment - z220 561000-409603SFF WKST HP Z220 SFF 5 _ 65000-47001 TW R STAND SFF Z220 .ww 5 63000-202502 MNTR FP WIDE SCR LCD 201N 5 64007-50015 KEYPAD 35 KEY 5 F CBL e�. 5 04000-01005 KVM SWITCH DVI 4 -PORT 5 853004-00401 SAM EXT SPKR KIT 5 85303_0-00302 R4 SAM HDWR KIT 5 809800-35109 R4 IWS CFG 5 809800-35108 R4 IWS STG FEE 1 870890-07501 CPR/SYSPREP IMAGING Cassidian Communications VESTA 4 IRR Module 5 873099-00502 R4 IRR LIC/DOC/MED 5 809800-35114R4 I RR SW SPT SYR Cassidian Communications VESTA 4 CDR Module _ R4 CDR SVR LIC UPGD 873099-01102U R4 CDR PER SEAT LIC UPGD r15873099-00602U 04000-00420 CALL RECORD PRNTR HI END 04000-00419 PARALLEL PRNTR RIBBON 65000-03133 CBL USB SHLD M/M 10FT 1 6404C-60022 PRI NT SVR 61301 LAN Cassidian Communications VESTA-4 Admin Printer 1 64040-60019 PRNTR USB COLOR Note: Inkjet Color printer. Recommended monthly volume, 7,500 pages, 1 65000-03133 CBL USB SHLD M/M 10FT Baldwin Park March 18, 2014 12 HPSwitch/Router Equipment 2 104000-26201 ISWITCH 2620 24 -PORT Peripherals & Gateways 1 850830-03011 KIT EXT MODEM PKG 56K 2 04000-00129 MED 100013 CHASSIS BNDL 2 04000-00190 —�W SPT M1000 GATEWAY SYR Security Appliance Peripherals & Equipment Racks 1 06500-55053 EQUIPMENT RACK 191N 1 63002-172805 MNTR NEC 171N 1 04000-004134 KVIVI 4 -PORT SWITCH Qty- Part No. Description Note: VESTA/Sentinel 4/X Agent bundle includes (1) 1/2 cl�y class of Agenttraining for Note: VESTA/Sentinel 4/X Admin bundle includes (1) 11/2 day class of Admin training for up to 8 students. Includes trainer's claiL)L���12vd. Cutover Coaching Note: Cutover Coaching includes (1) 8 hour session within a 24 hour day. Includes trainer's daily training expenses and travel. Extended Warranties Server Extended Warranty 104000-01562 Note: Upgrade & uplift from 1YR warranty 9x5 NBD to 5YRs, 24x7, 4 hour response ti me. Workstation Extended Warranty —6 1104000-01586 1 WARR 24X7 Z220 SYR Baldwin Park Note: Warranty upgrade from 3YRs warranty 9x5 NBD to 5YRs 240, 4 hour March 18.2O14 13 Aurora - MIS Svstem Note: Aurora Lite Onsite Training includes two hours e of Admin training for up to 8 students. This course is for Aurora Lite customers who require an instructor -led course at the customers site. This course is provided during the regular system training. Baldwin Park March 18, 2014 14 Aurora 2.2 - LITE MIS ,System 1 873399-00102.2 AURORA 2.2 DOC/MED 1 873391-04003 AURORA LITE LIC 1 873391-04002 AURORA LITE USER LIC 1 04000-00339 SQL 2008R2 CAL RUN ENT 5 873391-04001 AURORA LITE COLLECT LIC 5 809800-03605 AURORA LITE SPT 5YR Aurora LITE Server Equipment for Virtualized Server Bundle - ML310e/G8 Note: Additional Hardware to be installed in DDS -13 Server, 1 BA-SOO-ALBO V -AUR LITE SM ADD-ON 1 000000-24407 AURORA LITE ONSITE TRNG Note: Aurora Lite Onsite Training includes two hours e of Admin training for up to 8 students. This course is for Aurora Lite customers who require an instructor -led course at the customers site. This course is provided during the regular system training. Baldwin Park March 18, 2014 14 __ ...... w...... Cassidian Communications VESTA 4 CommandPOST System Baldwin Park March 18, 2014 15 0, Cassidian Communications VESTA4 CommandPOST System 1 870899-00304.0 VESTA 4 PER SEAT LIC 1 809800-35094 R4 SW SPT 5YR CommandPOST Hardware 1 _ 61050-1409611-W7 SENT CPOST 8570P W7 1 04000-00486 ADV DOCK STATION 8570P 1 04401-00097 BATTERY 9 -CELL 8570P 10OW 1 64021-10025 KYBD/MOUSE BNDL 1 63000-202502 MNTR FP WIDE SCR LCD 20IN 1 64007-50015 KEYPAD 35 KEY 5FT CBL 1 853004-00401 SAM EXT SPKR KIT 1 853004-00301 CPOSTSAM HDWR KIT. ..... _www 1 809800-35109 R4 IWS CFG - gym ....... 1 809800-35108 ........_ R4 IWS STG FEE m ................. Cassidian Communications VESTA 4 IRR Module 1 873099-00502 R4 IRR LIC/DOC/MED 1 809800-35114 R4 I RR SW SPT 5YR Cassidian Communications VESTA 4 CDR Module 1 873099-01102 R4 CDR PER SEAT LIC Aurora - MIS System Licensing & Support 1 873391-04001 AURORA LITE COLLECT LIC 1 809800-03605 JAURORA LITE SPT 5YR Baldwin Park March 18, 2014 15 a;O N N Z77, coW O O?,' (9 ; Ck , --I O) cn N ( 'LO 01 C>,; 0", ,;O, J N 0o O v 0 CD N x 0 _ R°F < v v s m a m 3 D °C �m < ms' 3 Oto ccn0 C) h -. °1 m ID O� Z m D s -=4:h wmCO W o w j O v (=3 h CO n O O 3 O � W � O CA ca 3 Q CL O � A 0A,o O -0 (D N -h O to _ 3 n (D N = 0 2) --i O 3 0 a/j D (�p t71 <a rt C `° < m n Z m y CD 0 CD v CL N v n D �_ _ m CI) N `� (n -0O a� m N (n- m D C m o m 0 � v t C cn t? C to D CD Cr 0) - iU '5- _ M U7 =r w- O O s C D Q M p 0 =3 (D _ �3 (D :' p (D �NW(a 3+ (D O (n O =« p 3 (Q = x N (n cn U) Q 3 X �' 53' cn (n cn o N (n 7 N —I .. W u O' u p -I (D 6 Q 6 n y N p 0 p x -I -A -� u3" � x m -I � -I 0 � �* r r\co N N e=f fl1 41 N O co NCD N N a;O N N Z77, coW O O?,' (9 ; Ck , --I O) cn N ( 'LO 01 C>,; 0", ,;O, J N 0o N N N N N N N l!1 -p.. w N N N N N N O 0000 S (D D O OO o O c � Ln Ul LF1 a F s rn w w w w o v v v _0 -D Oo fD (D fD (D fD r t (D c c c c c �„• 0 0 0 0 0 O O 3 3 3 3 3 �* (D(D (D (D m X -0 _ N (D (D fD (D 6 r'A0 CL m0- D- rD < Q O = m O N O < Q O_ CL O_ f<D O_ Q S 7' o r+ (D (DLn v 3 0, c ° m m v o r; SN O 0 r+ O 0 70 n°i ° o < Q — (u (D D 3 0 O r+ X 01 4I S X- �< 0 (D n -* Oq c a o 1- O rr aq rn w rD aq 0 0 00 O rD n 0 O 0 rt Q S (D .O (O r+ a 0 3 z 0 n 77 O v r+ O rr v O -„ v O r~ F-' lD F-+ W W V M Lm � w N F-+ Z . . . . 1 A w N I O. -1 -1 3� _S S _S in In In In vi in v y _S V1 VI (DVI � 0 N V1 V1 n D c c c c c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c c c O O O O O O rt rt rr rr F+ + r+ r+ rr 1+ 1 o r Ln O °Op O n n 0 0- 0 r c m e m Q. Q Q Q Q L" N CL 0) 0 N m N (D z (QD z 0 0 CA vO, fD 0 z z 0 n Z N n N �+ O �+ p o v u, o n �_ in L o ° o 0 ° L, I� (D (p O_ O N N. L n Z N 03 O_ L D d- (D � N Gi p�j o (D o T 00 r)' (j N T. iii ,+ N O D o, O 0- s" rr m r°'+ 0 m� -h r_ 00 Ul -1 Q D(D O r01r ° (D r+ O° s ^' (D Q 03 o c °q 3 D (D A 5• < �p CL O O >r) ;:w CL 53 , �o�� o cnz o Q � � '+ rD `< o S v m O -0O N r-rr Dq (D l/1 p <O rt: C (D fr+ d O n o (D � LA rr �' LA 0O(D O (D Oq v) rr n Oa c :Eo !^ (D -0 O Q O 0'cl 'O � f�D 0 O- (D Dn) rD O O' CLC r� (D S O 0) v v O r+ p O o(( m 3 0ODI M= DD z S �! _ w CD OD Ol C) C j G �i7 rr+ J :3 CO o (.0 3 G) Cn N co r Q. O. G w CD CD vA 0 X 0 O O co (Q n C C (D CDJ� 3 fD rt PHONE SUPPLEMENTS 1259 N. TUSTIN AVE. ANAHEIM CA 92807 (714) 632-3838 CUST #- 01-0034369 SOLD TO: BALDWIN PARK POLICE DEPT 14403 8. PACIFIC AVE. ATTN: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 azzz��� ORDER NUMBER: S123931 ORDER DATE: 8/13/2015 PROC BY: RD UPDATED BY;RD SALESPERSON: 0001 NAME: PS Hse SHIP TO: BALDWIN PARK POLICE DEPT. 144Q3 E. PACIFIC AVENUE ATTN: LIZ PEREIDA DISPATCH SUPERVISOR BALDWIN PARK, CA 51706 NET ORDEIR: 834.60 . . . .......... . . . FREIG11T: 20.00 SALE'S TAX; 75. 11 ORDER 'J'OTAI', 929.71 EFFECTIVE TO: 8/31/2015 Customer P.O. Ship VIA F.O.B. Terms quote FED EX GRD I NET 30 ITEM NO. QTY QUOTED PRICE AMOUNT H141N DuoSet Convert. HS W/ NC 5 60.95 304,75 H171N DuoPro Conv Noise Cancelling 5 77.05 385.25 HBIN Tristar w/Qrj & NC 1 80.50 80.50 62800-01 Neck Band Duo Pro/Set 5 11.50 57.50 43937-01 Duoset/CS50 Ear Cushions® 1 pr 3 2.20 6.60 SHIPPING COST IS ESTIMATED NET ORDEIR: 834.60 . . . .......... . . . FREIG11T: 20.00 SALE'S TAX; 75. 11 ORDER 'J'OTAI', 929.71 State of California, California 9-1-1, Emergency Communications Office (9.1-1 Office) COMMITMENT TO FUND 9-1-1 EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES TD -288 (Rev. 12106) Public Age Address: City, State, Zip: PSAP Manager: This Form To Be Completed By The State 9-1-1 Office On Boldwin Park PID Contractor Name: 14403 Pacific Ave. Mailing Address: Baldwin Park, CA 91706 City, State, Zip Elizabeth Perelda Representative: Dell E-mail Address: m-mul E -Mail Address: Phone Number: 626-960-1955 Phone Number: .... . . . . . . ........ ................ Fax Number, 626-338-5545 Fax Nurnber: Type of Funding Request: 9-1-1 Equipment 9-1-1 Network Training 9-1-1 Education County Coordinator Expense 7 -Digit Phone Lines Maintenance Other: CPE Allotment Residual Spending Description of Equipment and Services to be funded: Dell Is providing 5 Mapping PC's to Baldwin Park PD Note: Payment is required by the PSAP directly to vendors. A TD -290 claim must be submitted by the PSAP with copies of their proof of payment and vendor Invoices in order to receive reimbursement. Purchase/Service Information: Include equipment or service description, quantity, part number, unit cost, Installation cost, monthly cost, tax and total cost. Attach contractors quote or PSAP purchase order, where applicable. Service! Monthly Total Total Non - Description Quantity Eqmt. Unit Cost Installation Cost Recurring Cost Recurring Cost Dell Mapping Computers (5) 1 7,149.26 7.149.25 ................... . . . ............ . . ..... . ........... . .... ...... ...... .................. Subtotal' 7,149,25 L Tax and Surcharge L458L.63 TOTAL APPROVED $7,607.78 -- --- - --- -- ------ - TD -288 expiration date: N/A Fiscal Year: 2015/2016 All invoices shall refer to tracking numbor, 18648 PSAPIObject Code-, 1905R02.12 The State of Callfornla's monetaryohiligation under this agreement In subsequent fiscal years is subject to, and ,rat nt upon 4vatlability of funds In the State Einergency Telephone Account, Please be advised that this cola talent to:4dAoes no!,constit qte a binding purchase order agreement, RF)"90MME APFSROVAL We j Telephone Number PPROVED B Date I iiuAZ,4_,k_ tiI 8/� 918-657-9459 DANA EARL tc /qj Quote Summary_712605782 QUOTATION Quote #: Customer M Contract #: CustomerAgreement #: Quote Date: Date: 8/312015 Customer Name: 712605782 142878503 70137 Dell Std Terms 08/03/2016 CA 911 EMER COMM OFFICE Thanks for choosing Dell! Your quote is detailed below; please review the quote for product and informational accuracy. If you find errors or desire certain changes please contact your sales professional as soon as possible. Sales Professional Information SALES REP: PAUL KASTUK PHONE: 1800 - 4563355 Email Address: Pa I Kast 'kio Dell.corn Phone Ext: 80000 GROUP: 1 QUANTITY: 5 SYSTEM PRICE: $1,258,79 GROUP TOTAL: $6,293.95 Description Quantity OptiPlex 9020 Small Form Factor (210-AATO) 5 8GI3 (2x4GB) 1600MHz DDR3 Non -ECC (370 -AAMC) 5 No Keyboard Selected (580-AABG) 5 No Monitor (480-ABHJ) 5 Bracket for Graphic Card for SFF, Dell OptiPlex 9020 (490-BBFS) 5 Dual 1G AMD Radeon R5-240 Graphics, w/DPandDVl Port, Low Profile (490-BCEX) 5 No Wireless (555-BBFO) 5 3.5 inch 50006 7200rpm Hard Disk Drive (400 -RANO) 5 Windows 7 Professional English/French 64bit (Includes Windows 8.1 Pro license) (536- BBBJ) 5 US Order (332-1286) 5 OptiPlex 9020 Small Form Factor Chassis wl up to 85 Percent Efficient PSU (Bronze V2) (329-BCKC) 5 No mouse selected on your OptiPlex system (570-AAAF) 5 No ESTAR (387-BBCG) 5 No Bcom required (555-BBKH) 5 8X DVD -ROM Drive (429-AADR) 5 Internal Dell Business Audio Speaker (520-AABP) 5 No Wireless (555-BBFO) 5 System Power Cord (PhilipinelTH/US) (450-AAOJ) 5 Windows 8.1 DVD OS Recovery(English) (620-AASU) 5 Dell Back-up and Recovery Manager for Windows 7, Multiple Language (637-AAAK) 5 No Quick Reference Guide (340-ABKW) 5 Microsoft Office Trial, MUI, OptiPlex, Precision, Latitude (630-AABP) 5 Dell Limited Hardware Warranty Plus Service (997-6870) 5 ProSupport Plus: Accidental Damage Service, 3 Years (997-6939) 5 ProSupport Plus: Keep Your Hard Drive, 3 Years (997.6949) 5 ProSupport Plus: Next Business Day Onsite 3. Years (997-6959) 5 Page 1 of 4 file:///C:/Users/Elizabeth%20Pereida/AppData/LocaUMicrosoftl WiiidowslT'empomry%20In... 8/4/2015 Quote Sumtnary_712605782 ProSupport Plus: 7x24 Technical Support, 3 Years (997-6979) No Special BIOS Setup Required (696-BBBC) Intel vPro Technology Enabled. (631-AABI) Dell 19 Monitor- PI 914S without stand (857-BBBD) No Diagnostic/Recovery CD media (340-ABJI) No Quick Reference Guide (340-ABKW) NO ADAPTER (470-AAJL) Dell Digital Delivery Client (421-4047) Thank you for buying Dell (421-9982) Dell Data Protection System Tools Digital Delivery/DT (422-0008) Visit www.delI.com/encryption (632-BBBZ) Thank you for buying Dell (632-BBCB) Adobe Reader 11 (640-BBDF) Dell Data Protection I Protected Workspace (640-BBEV) Enable Low Power Mode (658-BBMQ) Dell Client System (658-BBMT) Waves Maxx Audio (658-BBNH) NO RAID (817-BBBN) No Anti -Virus software (650-AAHJ) Intel Core i7-4790 Processor (Quad Core, 3.6GHz, 8MB Cache, w/HD Graphics 4600) (338-BFIK) Dell Data Protection Encryption Personal Edition Digital Delivery (421-9984) Dell ProSupport for Software, Dell Data Protection Encryption Personal Edition, 1 Year (954-3455) Chassis Intrusion Switch (461-AAAX) No Intel Responsive (551-BBBJ) Small Form Factor Chassis Mainstream Heatsink (95watts) (412-AABM) SHIP MTL;SYSM,OptiPlex SFF (340-ACGR) PowerDVD Software not included (429-AAGQ) Thank You for Choosing Dell (340-ADBJ) Thank You for Choosing Dell (340-ADBJ) Regulatory Label,9020SFF, Mexico (389-BCDL) No Add On Card (382-BBBZ) Intel Core 17 vPro Label (389-BBWO) State Environmental Fee for display 15 inches, less than 35 inches (600-0277) SOFTWARE & ACCESSORIES Product Microsoft Sculpt Ergonomic Desktop - Keyboard, mouse and numeric pad set - 2A GHz - English - North American layout (A7151160) C2G DVI -1 MIM Single Link DlgitallAnalog Video Cable - Display cable - DVI -1 (M) - DVI -I (M) - 6.6 ft - black (A0489026) GROUP TOTAL: $856.30 Quantity Unit Price 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Total 5 $109.99 $549.95 10 $8,89 $88.90 file:///C:/Users/Elizabeth%o20Pereidr pp atalLocal/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20In... 8/4/2015 Quote Summary_712605782 Dell Stereo USB Monitor Soundbar AC511 (318-2885) C2G DVI -D Dual Link Digital Video Cable - DVI cable - dual link - DVI -D (M) - DVI -D (M) - 3.3 ft - black (A6875521) "Total Purchase Price: Product Subtotal: Tax: Shipping & Handling: State Environmental Fee: Shipping Method: Page 3 of 4 $27.29 $136.45 10 $8.00 $80.00 $7,607.78 $7,129.25 $458.53 $0.00 $20.00 LTL 5 DAY OR LESS (• Amount denoted in $) Order this quote easily online through your l .r p�r rip g:f,, or if you do not have Premier, using t9 Order Statement of Conditions The information in this document is believed to be accurate. However, Dell assumes no responsibility for inaccuracies, errors, or omissions, and shall not be liable for direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages resulting from any such error or omission. Dell is not responsible for pricing or other errors, and reserves the right to cancel orders arising from such errors. Dell may make changes to this proposal including changes or updates to the products and services described, including pricing, without notice or obligation. Terms of Sale This quote is valid for 30 days unless otherwise stated. Unless you have a separate written agreement that specifically applies to this order, your order will be subject to and governed by the following agreements, each of which are incorporated herein by reference and available in hardcopy If this purchase from Dell at your request: p ase is for your internal use only; Dell's Commercial Terms of Sale (www.dell.c rri/CT' ), which incorporate Dell's U.S. Return Policy (www deli com(rpttircu ralj�j,) and Warranty (WWWI I � � 'rte rrty :)". If this purchase is intended for resale: Dell's Reseller Terms of Sale (www,dell.com/resellerterms). If this purchase Includes services: in addition to the foregoing applicable terms, Dell's Service Terms ()ntw+ .dell com/serylo+ contranks/glr�t2 If this purchase includes software. In addition to the foregoing applicable terms, your use of the: software Is subject to the Incense terms accompanying the software, and in the absence of such terms, their use of the Dell -branded application software is subject to the Dell End User License Agreement - Type A ()vawudelV�cowlt ll,) and use of the Dell -branded system software I$ subject to the hell End User License Agreement -Type S You acknowledge having read and agree to be bound by the foregoing applicable terms in thein entirety. Any terms and conditions set forth in your purchase order or any other correspondence that are in addition to, Inconsistent or In conflict with, the foregoing applicable online terms will be of no force or effect unless specifically agreed to in a writing signed by Dell that expressly references such terms, Additional Terms for Public Customiers If you are a department, agency, division, or office of any district, state„ county or municipal government within the united States ("Public Customer"),, the following terms ("Public Customer Terms") apply in addition to the foregoing terms: A. If any portion of the foregoing terms and conditions (or any terms referenced therein) is prohibited by law, such portion shall not apply to you. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, the End User License Agreements shall take precedence In all conflicts relevant to your use of any software. S By placing your order, you confirm that (1) you are a contracting officer or other authorized representative of Public Customer with authority to bind the Public Customer to these terms and conditions, and (2) you have read and agree to be 'bound by these terms and conditions, Pricing, Taxes, and Additional Information All product, pricing, and other Information Is valid for U,S. customers and U.S. addresses only, and is file:///C:/Users/Elizabeth%20Pereida/AppDatalLocal/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20In... 8/4/2015 ITEM NO. 6 STAFF REPOR]"' TO: 0 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Manuel Carrillo Jr., Director of Recreation & Community Seip -vice _6 DATE: Novembet -18,2015 SUBJECT: MEMO IkAN DUM OF UNDERSTAING FOR THE 2016 GREATER LOS ANGELES HOMELESS COUNT OPT -IN PROGRAM SUMMARY Staff request authorization to enter into a Memorandum of the Understanding (MOU) with Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority 2016 Greater Los Angeles Homeless Count Opt -In Program. FISCAL IMPACT No fiscal impact. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council authorize the Mayor to enter into an MOU with the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority. LEGAL REVIEW The City Attorney has reviewed the agreement and approved it as to form. BACKGROUND Los Angeles has the highest street 1�joinelcss population in the nation. Every day we see niell, women aild children without. a place to call, home. 'We don't have to accept horriclessness as an urlsolvab[c problem. "I'lle City of Baldwin Park will join- others who are committed to ending homelessness by volunteering in the community on January 26, 2016, Volunteers will be teamed Up and trained, provided all needed supplies and, deployed to designated areas to Count the homeless in one (1) night. Every twc) (2) years the City participates and organizes volunteers to count honictess, individuals in Los Angeles County, It is important to count horneless individuals because when we know who and where homeless people axe, we are better able to plan and identify resources to provide vital services, and ultimately move horneless families and individuals into housing. Volunteer Opportunities Include: • January 26, 2016 - Counters will be deployed in groups of two (2) or three (3) to count specific blocks areas in the City. Volunteer will, receive trainitig and materials on, the day of the count froin trained volunteers. Volunteers will be outside counting for tip to lbur (4) 110AJT'S-. • January 26, 2016 - Trainers will be responsible for training all counters at as specific deployment center, Trainers will take on a leadership role and should be cornfortable giving directions. '"rhe Los Angeles Homeless Count Homeless Services Authority will provide training prior to the date of the count. • January 26, 2016 - Deployment center coordinators will be in charge of tunning a deployment center in their local, area, Deployrnent center coordinators will take on a, leadership role and should be coni.fortable giving directions, This includes setting up, ensuring volunteers are trained and deployed appropriately, collecting and reviewing all tally sheets, and cleaning Upafter the count is over. ALTERNATIVES Not enter into an MOU with Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority 2016 Greater Los Angeles Homeless Count Opt -In Program. ATTACHMENTS 1) Memorandum of Understanding MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING OPT -IN PROGRAM FOR THE 2016 GREATER LOS ANGELES HOMELESS COUNT January 26, 27, and 28, 2016 This Opt -In Program Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) sets forth partnership roles and responsibilities between LAHSA and the Opt -In Participant during the 2016 Greater Los Angeles Homeless Count. BACKGROUND The Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA) is a joint powers authority formed by the City and County of Los Angeles in 1993, to address the problems of homelessness in Los Angeles. LAHSA is the lead agency of the Los Angeles Continuum of Care (LA CoQ. The LA CoC includes 85 cities and the unincorporated areas of Los Angeles County, excluding only the cities of Glendale, Long Beach and Pasadena, as each of those three cities operate their own independent Continuums. "Homeless Count" refers to the process of counting homeless persons residing in shelters or living on the street, in parks, cars or other places not meant for human habitation, as well as conducting the Housing Inventory Chart (HIC), an enumeration of the number of shelters, beds and units dedicated to housing homeless persons. Since 2005, LAHSA has coordinated six biennial Greater Los Angeles Homeless Counts. Beginning in 2016, the Point -In -Time Count ("Count") will occur annually. The Count consists of four components: 1) the street count; 2) the shelter count; 3) the youth count; and, 4) the demographic survey. The 2015 Homeless Count was the largest census in the country, benefitting from the support of more than 5,500 volunteers. In 2015 the Count discovered that on any given point -in -time approximately 41,174 residents are homeless in the LA CoC, and 44,359 people experience homelessness in Los Angeles County. The data gathered from the Homeless Count is extremely valuable to our mission of ending homelessness. It supplies government agencies, service providers and housing providers with a reliable estimate of the homeless population in the City and County of Los Angeles, including sub -regions such as Service Planning Areas (SPAS), Supervisorial Districts (SDs) and Council Districts (CDs) within the City of Los Angeles. It also provides an array of demographic information. In 2009, the study methodology was enhanced to enable Opt -In City/Community Areas to coordinate a homeless count within their borders, using locally recruited volunteers from public and private agencies. In 2015, 248 cities and communities enumerated all of their census tracts. Using the results from the LAHSA shelter and youth counts, cities are able to estimate a Point -in -Time number of the homeless families and individuals who are sheltered and unsheltered in their jurisdictions. The Opt -In Program gives cities, communities and other jurisdictions the opportunity to obtain locally -specific data at a high confidence level. Full enumeration of every agreed-upon census tract within each City/Community Area will provide more granular data and can substantially aid efforts to evaluate existing homeless services and plan for future measures to address local homelessness in your community. Page 1 of 13 August 2015 I. _OPT -IN PARTICIPANT RESPONSIBILITIES An Opt -In Participant is a City incorporated under the laws of the State of California, another form of local jurisdiction authorized by State law or County ordinance, or a community organization that has committed to participate in the 2016 Opt -In Program. Opt -In Participants are responsible for completing the full enumeration (complete counting) of all unsheltered homeless persons in the agreed-upon census tracts in their City/Community Area. (Exhibit A.) The Opt -In Participant is responsible for the following: A. To achieve continuous, reliable counts of unsheltered homeless persons, it is requested that 30 days prior to the Count your City/Community Area does not target homeless persons in order to conduct sweeps, as doing so would move homeless persons outside of the boundaries of your area and impact the accuracy of the Count. B. Providing the name, address, telephone number, capacity and picture of each Deployment Site. A Deployment Site is a location within your area from which volunteers will be deployed to perform the 2016 Homeless Count that meets the following requirements (Deployment Site Worksheet - Exhibit B): - Is NOT currently a site where services are provided to homeless people at night; - Has capacity and sufficient space to hold, and contains tables and chairs for, the specified number of volunteers for your area; - Is able to maintain sufficient cellular phone service coverage and/or has Wi-Fi access points, landline telephone lines, or another comparable means of communication in the absence of sufficient mobile service signal; - Contains accessible restroom facilities; - Includes, or is adjacent to, ample free parking; - Is located within the Opt -In boundaries approved by LAHSA; - Has a confirmed Deployment Site Coordinator, who sets -up the site and directs operations during the 2016 Homeless Count (further duties are listed in paragraph C, below); and - Has a confirmed Deployment Site Access Provider to assist with logistics and coordinating access during the 2016 Homeless Count, either by providing all necessary keys or being present to grant access during the Count. A Deployment Site Access Provider is the contact person or persons who will be responsible for providing access to each of the designated Deployment Sites in your area on the day/evening of the training and date of the Count. (Exhibit B) C. Designating and providing the name, office number, cellular number and email address of the Deployment Site coordinator, who has the following responsibilities/duties: - Directing the operations at a volunteer Deployment Site for the date of the count, including but not limited to the set-up of the site and ensuring volunteers receive a light meal; - Ensuring that volunteers are deployed in teams to the proper locations; - Tracking all volunteer teams to ensure that they return in a timely manner; - Assisting with volunteer questions; - Reviewing all incoming tally sheets for accuracy; - Communicating and coordinating with the Homeless Count Regional Coordinator, SPA Leadership and LAHSA headquarters on the status of the Count at their site; - Coordinating the pick-up and drop-off of all 2016 Homeless Count materials with LAHSA; and - Participating in training. D. Providing the name, office number, cellular number and email address for each Deployment Site Access Provider. Page 2 of 13 _ __ August 2015 E. Coordinating with the Homeless Count Regional Coordinator and provide regular communication of the status of progress, issues and volunteer recruitment including providing volunteer lists from the volunteer management system. Depending upon deployment needs on the date of the Count, your volunteers may be deployed to conduct 2016 Homeless Count activities outside of or adjacent to your City/Community Area. F. Providing confirmation of geographic boundaries for your City/Community Area from which the actual number of census tracts to be counted will be determined by LAHSA. (EXHIBIT A) G. Ensuring there is an unarmed security guard or police officer at each Deployment Site on the date of the Count. LAHSA will provide support for this requirement on a case by case basis. H. Ensuring that each adult volunteer signs a release and waiver (EXHIBIT C), and a parent or legal guardian of each minor volunteer (under 18 years of age) completes and signs a release and waiver (EXHIBIT D), indemnifying LAHSA and your City/Community Area from any liability during their participation on the date of the Count. Minors must be as least 14 years of age. I. Ensuring Site Coordinators and other appropriate volunteer staff attend trainings to support the successful implementation of the Count. J. Providing a light meal to volunteers on the date of the Count. Remember, volunteers arrive around meal time. K. Prior to your release and/or publication of any 2016 Homeless Count data results, obtain written approval from LAHSA for the data to be released or published. Any and all data releases MUST give recognition to LAHSA. II. LAHSA RESPONSBILITIES In order to ensure a successful enumeration of homeless persons across the LA CoC, LAHSA will be responsible for providing the following: A. The hiring of a Regional Homeless Count Manager who shall be responsible for interfacing with LAHSA, managing the Homeless Count Regional Coordinators (RCs), and overseeing their execution of 2016 Homeless Count activities within each Service Planning Area (SPA).. The RC will be the designated lead within the SPA who is responsible for managing, directing and overseeing the planning, logistics, coordination and execution of 2016 Homeless Count activities; B. The hiring of a consultant to analyze the data and provide the Point -In -Time Count results for the LA CoC, including homeless subpopulation and totals by geography, as well as the production of a 2016 Homeless Count report. C. Training the Deployment Site Coordinators and 2016 Homeless Count and volunteers. Deployment Site Coordinators will receive training on Count preparation, data collection, safety procedures and other relevant training, as needed. Volunteers will receive training on standard enumeration and safety procedures; D. Providing materials necessary for a successful Count, including, but not limited to, scanned copies (PDFs) of all the documentation needed to conduct the unsheltered and sheltered Count, as well as the demographic surveys; E. Providing a determination of the specific census tracts that need to be counted in order to achieve a full enumeration of unsheltered homeless persons in your area. LAHSA and the Opt -In Participant must be in agreement regarding the census tracts to be counted (EXHIBIT A) prior to the execution of this MOU. F. Based upon the number of census tracts to be enumerated in your area, LAHSA will provide Opt -In Participants with an estimate of the minimum number of volunteers needed to successfully complete your Count (EXHIBIT A); Page 3 of 13 August 2015 G. Based upon the number of census tracts to be counted and the geographic characteristics of your area, LAHSA will provide Opt -In Participants with a determination of the specific number of Deployment Sites that will be needed for a successful Count (see EXHIBIT A); H. Providing Opt -In Participants with an Opt -In Summary Report produced by the 2016 Homeless Count, based on the successful enumeration of 100% of all census tracts. III. HOMELESS COUNT REGIONAL COORDINATOR RESP'ONSBILITIES In order to ensure a successful enumeration of homeless persons within each participating City/Community Area, your designated Homeless Count Regional Coordinator is responsible for assisting with the following: A. Maintaining general oversight and management support in conducting the Count, youth count, shelter count and demographic survey. B. Outreaching and recruiting of Opt -In Participants. C. Collaborating with SPA stakeholders to leverage resources and coordinate logistical support prior to and during the 2016 Homeless Count, including, but not limited to, identifying potential Deployment Sites, obtaining security personnel and other relevant Count duties. D. Providing support with volunteer outreach, recruitment and tracking. E. Providing support by obtaining SPA level sponsorships. F. Supplying materials necessary for a successful Count. G. Providing ongoing guidance, tools, and assistance to Site Coordinators and other relevant volunteers. IV.. RELEASE INDEMNITY AND WAIVER OF LIABILITY A. The Opt -In Participant hereby agrees to waive, discharge, and release LAHSA and any of its employees, agents, officers and stakeholders from and against all lawsuits and causes of action, or liability for any loss or claim for damages of any nature whatsoever, including injury to person or property. B. The Opt -In Participant further agrees to indemnify and hold LAHSA and any of its employees, agents, officers and stakeholders harmless from liability for any loss or claim for damages of any nature whatsoever, including injury to person or property, arising from or in any way related to the 2016 Homeless Count. Page 4 of 13 August 2015 V. OPT -IN COMMITMENT The execution of this MOU by an authorized official of your City/Community Area signifies a commitment to participate in the 2016 Opt -In Program and to fulfill all of the responsibilities expected of Opt -In Participants as specified in this MOU. Irr ar In the event that your City/Community Area decides to OPT -OUT of the 2016 Homeless Count, LAHSA reserves the right to withhold any and all data from your Community/City Area produced by the 2016 Homeless Count. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Opt -In Participant and the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority have caused this MOU to be executed by their duly authorized representatives. For:. Name .._of Of6 pt -In Participant By: By Name of Authorized Official, Title Authorized Signature Peter Lynn, Executive Director Date, - Page 5 of 13 August 2015 991-92ORM EXHIBIT A .........Approved Census Tracts and Maps of City/Community Area EXHIBIT B.......... Deployment Site Worksheet EXHIBIT C________________________ .Release, Indemnity and Waiver of Liability Agreement for Adult Volunteers EXHIBIT D...............................Release, Indemnity and Waiver of Liability Agreement for Youth Volunteers Page 6 of 13_ ._ August 2015 EXHIBIT A APPROVED CENSUS TRACTS AND MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS The below table lists the census tracts that have been approved for enumeration as part of the Opt -In Program: NMI Baldwin Park 404701 8 Driving 22.00 0.59 Baldwin Park404702 ....�. ... .._...._.._ 4 Driving ......_. 18.42 0.45 ..... .......Baldwin Park ...._ 404703 4 Driving 12.64 _ 0.48 Baldwin Park 404801 8 Driving 20.27 __ 0.54 Baldwin Park 404802 _.m 4 Driving 14.69 0.40 _....... Baldwin Park ._. 404803 .......__. .. 4 a.......... Walking _... 8.24 0.18 Baldwin Park ......._.. 404901 4 Driving 15.48 0.44 Baldwin Park 404902 2 Driving 10.29 0.27 Baldwin Park 404903 2 Driving 10.91 0.21 Baldwin Park405001 ._..__. 4 .. Driving 18.55 0.65 _... Baldwin Park .......�.... 405._..., 002 4 Walking9.35 0.34 Baldwin Park 405101 4 Driving 16.01 0.43 Baldwin Park 405102 2 Driving 15.870.37 Baldwin Park 405201 4 Driving 18.82 0.52 Baldwin Park 405202 2 Driving 15.27 0.37 Baldwin Park 405203 4 Walking 9.69 0.28 16 64 236.49 6.52 Page 7 of 13 _ August 2015 I Page 8 of 13 August 2015 EXHIBIT B DEPLOYMENT SITE WORKSHEET Please complete one worksheet and provide a picture for each 2016 Homeless Count Deployment Site. City/Community Area Count Date Page 9 of 13 - August 2015 Name Site Name Email iff Work Mobile ... Address Location Deployment SPA - Site Picture Provided Via ..x,l�ro� Hard copy Email SiteI lG Volunteer Capacity fi Volunteers On -Site Parkin„ Off :Site Parking Capacities,', P Chairs . fables # l facts H Teams Name Deploymer ite: Emeli Coordinator Work Mobile ,, ua�,rr�r+rau �a Ux'a .a�avF+-�,�mY nr =��rra�„ rr r.:.. o�<�✓ e �E.i+�d.��,.�.. ..� v.. iu. sr rw, � F, ,wz ✓�, 77 Name Assistant, _._ Deployment Site Email nPSIflPIatPC�""� "'Coordinator, work Mobile Page 9 of 13 - August 2015 Name Site Email iff Work Mobile ... Page 9 of 13 - August 2015 EXHIBIT C RELEASE, INDEMNITY AND WAIVER OF LIABILITY AGREEMENT FOR ADULT VOLUNTEERS ww w I. I understand and agree that the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA) will be conducting the 2016 Greater Los Angeles Homeless Count (2016 Homeless Count), and that I may volunteer to assist in this important community effort as set forth in this Agreement. As a 2016 Homeless Count volunteer, I also understand that my behavior and actions will be expected to be morally responsible and ethical. It. I understand and agree that my services are temporary, and therefore I will only be participating on the date(s) of January 26, 27, and/or 28, 2016 from 8:00 p.m., (unless another time has been specified) until my Street Count shift is finished (approximately between 12:00 a.m. and 2:00 a.m., unless another time is specified). I further understand that I am eligible to participate on all three consecutive dates. Ill.. I understand that my involvement in the 2016 Homeless Count may be terminated at any time due to inappropriate behavior, reckless endangerment, or lack of sufficient work productivity, and that I may withdraw from the 2016 Homeless Count at any time without any cause or justification. IV. I understand and agree that I must complete a 30 -minute training session either prior to or on the date of the Street Count as a requirement to participate in the 2016 Homeless Count. V, I understand and agree that I will not receive any monetary compensation for attending the 30 -minute training session, nor will I receive monetary compensation for any date that I volunteer for the 2016 Homeless Count, unless I am a registered Homeless Stipend Volunteer. VI. I understand and agree that I am responsible for transportation to and from the training session and deployment sites on the specified dates and times of such events. __ Page 10 of 13 August 2015 I understand and agree that my participation in the 2016 homeless count as a volunteer holds inherent risks that cannot be eliminated regardless of the care taken to avoid injuries. I understand that these risks vary from minor to severe, and I hereby agree to accept all risks of injury, of any nature whatsoever. III. RELEASE INDEMNITY', AND WAIVE OF LIABILITY' A. I understand that my participation is voluntary, and as such, I hereby agree to waive, discharge, and release LAHSA and any of its employees, agents, officers, stakeholders and Opt -In Participants from and against all lawsuits and causes of action, or liability for any loss or claim for damages of any nature whatsoever, including injury to person or property. B. I further agree to indemnify and hold LAHSA and any of its employees, agents, officers, stakeholders and Opt -In Participants harmless from liability for any loss or claim for damages of any nature whatsoever, including injury to person or property, arising from or in any way related to my participation in the 2016 Homeless Count. I have carefu t of the foregoing statements and without reservations I woulomeless Count. Volunteer Name: Volunteer Signature: Print Name Signature Date of Signature. _/_/ —_ Month Day Year __. Page 11 of 13 August 2015 EXHIBIT D RELEASE, INDEMNITY AND WAIVER OF LIABILITY AGREEMENT FOR YOUTH VOLUNTEERS A. I understand and agree that the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA) will be conducting the 2016 Greater Los Angeles Homeless Count (2016 Homeless Count), and that my son, daughter or other minor dependent age 14 and up, may volunteer to assist in this important community effort as set forth in this Agreement. As a 2016 Homeless Count volunteer, I also understand and agree that my son's, daughter's or other dependent's behavior and actions will be expected to be morally responsible and ethical. B. I understand and agree that my son's, daughter's or other minor dependent's volunteer service will be limited to assisting with various activities within a specified Deployment site, under the supervision of the Deployment Site Coordinator, and that he or she will not participate in Street Count activities outside of the Deployment site. C. I understand that my son's, daughter's or other minor dependent's services are temporary, and therefore he or she will only be participating on one or more the date(s) of January 26, 27, and/or 28, 2016 from 8:00 p.m. (unless another time has been specified) until such time that may be considered "curfew" by applicable city ordinance(s). D. I understand and agree that my son's, daughter's or other minor dependent's involvement in the 2016 Homeless Count may be terminated at any time due to inappropriate behavior, reckless endangerment, or lack of sufficient work productivity, and that my son, daughter or other minor dependent may withdraw from the 2016 Homeless Count at any time without any cause or justification. E. I understand and agree that my son, daughter or other minor dependent will not receive any monetary compensation for attending the 30 -minute training session, nor will he or she receive monetary compensation for any date that he or she volunteers for the 2016 Homeless Count. Page 12 of 13 August 2015 F. I understand and agree that I am responsible for the transportation of my son, daughter or other minor dependent to and from the training session and deployment sites on the specified dates and times of such events. I understand and agree that my son's, daughter's or other minor dependent's participation in the 2016 homeless count as a volunteer in the deployment site holds certain inherent risks that cannot be eliminated regardless of the care taken to avoid injuries. I understand that these risks vary from minor to severe, and I hereby agree to accept all risks of injury, of any nature whatsoever. A. I understand that my son's, daughter's or other minor dependent's participation is voluntary, and as such I hereby agree to waive, discharge, and release LAHSA and any of its employees, agents, officers, stakeholders and Opt -In Participants from and against all lawsuits and causes of action, or liability for any loss or claim for damages of any nature whatsoever, including injury to person or property. B. I further agree to indemnify and hold LAHSA and any of its employees, agents, officers, stakeholders and Opt -In Participants harmless from liability for any loss or claims for damages of any nature whatsoever, including injury to person or property, arising from or in any way related to my participation in the 2016 Homeless Count. I�the underd _harsh re resent that I am the agent le al uardian of the lelowmnarned Doth volunteer a aerson under the awe of 18 rears, and that I have the le al authorit to execute this Release. I have careful r read and full f understand the rneanirt1 and effect of the fore-oin statements and without reservations I ive errnission tom son dao liter or other minor d'e endent t artid aL in the 2,016 Homeless C_o_Ot. Youth Volunteer Name: Parent/Guardian Name: Parent/Guardian Signature: Print Name Print Name Signature Date of Signature: ...... %..... Page 13 of 13 August 2015 A Community Engagement Meeting must be held in each Study Area between December 1, 2015 and February 15, 2016. The meeting can be run by city staff or by a community-based organization of your choice. The meeting facilitator must attend one of three trainings. At the training, facilitators will receive all information needed to hold the meeting. To offset the cost of the Community Engagement Meeting, a $2,500 stipend is available for each Study Area. Please answer the questions below and return this form to Rita Robinson rrobinson@parks.lacounty.gov by October 15, 2015 Please tell us about your community engagement meeting: Date: 01/13/2016 Time: 5:30 om Location: Esther Snyder Community Center 4100 Baldwin Park Blvd, Baldwin Park CA 91706 ❑✓ Parking provided p Accessible by public transportation What translation services (if any) will be provided? Languages: Spanish Who will be facilitating your community engagement event(s)? I]City Staff ❑Community -Based Organization. Name of CBO: Please provide the contact information for the primary facilitator and any secondary facilitator (if applicable) that will be attending the mandatory training. You may have a maximum of 2 people. Name: Jenny T. Padilla Name: April Nava Title: Program Specialist II Title: Proaram Coordinator Address: 4100 Baldwin Park Blvd, Baldwin Park CA 91706 Address: 4100 Baldwin Park Blvd, Baldwin Park CA 91706 Phone: jpadilla@baldwinpark.com Phone: 4100 Baldwin Park Blvd, Baldwin Park CA 91706 Email: ipadilla@baldwinpark.com Email: 4100 Baldwin Park Blvd, Baldwin Park CA 91706 Please rank your preference for a mandatory facilitator training date. Space is limited at each training and spaces will be reserved based on the timely return of this form. Monday --November 16, 2015 10:00am-12:OOpm Roy Anderson Recreation Center Tuesday --November 17, 2015 6:30pm-8:30pm Los Angeles County Arboretum Saturday --November 21, 2015 10:00am-12:OOpm San Fernando Park Please describe how you will promote your engagement meeting (select all that apply): [Z]Publicly posted notice ❑Canvassing ❑Mailers ❑ Television/ Radio (Z]Website ❑✓ Other ❑✓ Social Media Please describe your attendance goal (# of attendees): 100 Please provide any additional details related to your action plan for engaging the community: The list of prioritized parks projects generated at the community engagement meeting is due to the County by February 29, 2016. P Study Area: 2124 cill rleecl m PARKS Community Engagement Plan A Community Engagement Meeting must be held in each Study Area between December 1, 2015 and February 15, 2016. The meeting can be run by city staff or by a community-based organization of your choice. The meeting facilitator must attend one of three trainings. At the training, facilitators will receive all information needed to hold the meeting. To offset the cost of the Community Engagement Meeting, a $2,500 stipend is available for each Study Area. Please answer the questions below and return this form to Rita Robinson rrobinson@parks.lacounty.gov by October 15, 2015 Please tell us about your community engagement meeting: Date: 01/13/2016 Time: 5:30 om Location: Esther Snyder Community Center 4100 Baldwin Park Blvd, Baldwin Park CA 91706 ❑✓ Parking provided p Accessible by public transportation What translation services (if any) will be provided? Languages: Spanish Who will be facilitating your community engagement event(s)? I]City Staff ❑Community -Based Organization. Name of CBO: Please provide the contact information for the primary facilitator and any secondary facilitator (if applicable) that will be attending the mandatory training. You may have a maximum of 2 people. Name: Jenny T. Padilla Name: April Nava Title: Program Specialist II Title: Proaram Coordinator Address: 4100 Baldwin Park Blvd, Baldwin Park CA 91706 Address: 4100 Baldwin Park Blvd, Baldwin Park CA 91706 Phone: jpadilla@baldwinpark.com Phone: 4100 Baldwin Park Blvd, Baldwin Park CA 91706 Email: ipadilla@baldwinpark.com Email: 4100 Baldwin Park Blvd, Baldwin Park CA 91706 Please rank your preference for a mandatory facilitator training date. Space is limited at each training and spaces will be reserved based on the timely return of this form. Monday --November 16, 2015 10:00am-12:OOpm Roy Anderson Recreation Center Tuesday --November 17, 2015 6:30pm-8:30pm Los Angeles County Arboretum Saturday --November 21, 2015 10:00am-12:OOpm San Fernando Park Please describe how you will promote your engagement meeting (select all that apply): [Z]Publicly posted notice ❑Canvassing ❑Mailers ❑ Television/ Radio (Z]Website ❑✓ Other ❑✓ Social Media Please describe your attendance goal (# of attendees): 100 Please provide any additional details related to your action plan for engaging the community: The list of prioritized parks projects generated at the community engagement meeting is due to the County by February 29, 2016. FUNDING AGREEMENT FOR COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITIES RELATED TO THE COUNTYWIDE PARKS NEEDS ASSESSMENT CITY OF BALDWIN PARK THIS FUNDING AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into this day of 2015 by LOS ANGELES COUNTY, body corporate and politic ("County") and CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, a body corporate and politic ("City"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the County Board of Supervisors adopted a motion dated February 3, 2015 authorizing the Director of the County Department of Parks and Recreation to execute this Agreement with the City to fund costs for community engagement activities ("Community Engagement") related to the countywide parks needs assessment effort upon approval as to form by County Counsel. WHEREAS, the County is willing to provide the City with funding to assist the City in its efforts to engage the residents of the study area(s) listed on Exhibit_A; attached hereto (each, a "Study Area") to identify and prioritize park projects within such Study Area (s). WHEREAS, the City, with funding assistance from County, intends to implement a community engagement plan attached thereto as Exhibit 8 ("Community Engagement Plan") within the Study Area(s). WHEREAS, County intends to provide funds to the City in the amount of $2,500 ("Engagement Funds") per Study Area and pursuant to California Government Code Section 26227 County may fund projects that are necessary to meet the social needs of the County. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: A. Approved Funding and Costs. County hereby grants to the City the Engagement Funds in the amount of $2,500 ($2,500 per Study Area) to support the City's Community Engagement. B. Agreement Term. This Agreement will remain in force until completion of the Community Engagement by the City, or as mutually agreed by the City and the County. C. Indemnity 1. City agrees to indemnify defend and hold harmless County, its agents, special districts, elected officials, officers and employees, from and against any and all liability, expense, including defense costs and legal fees, and claims for damages of any nature whatsoever, including, but not limited to bodily injury, death, personal injury, or property damage arising from or connected with City's operations or services hereunder, including any workers' compensation suits, Federal Fair Labor Standards Act wage or hour law violations, liability, or expense, arising from or connected with services performed by or on behalf of City by any person pursuant to this Agreement. 2. County agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, its officers, directors, or employees, from and against any and all liability, expense (including reasonable outside attorney fees) resulting from the willful negligent acts or omissions of County, its agents, officers, or employees in connection with this Agreement. HOA. 1184451.3 D. Financial Records 1. The City agrees to use a generally accepted accounting system and to maintain satisfactory financial accounts, documents, and records of this expenditure of Engagement Funds and to make them available to County for auditing and inspection at reasonable times for the purpose of verifying appropriateness and validity of expenditures of Engagement Funds under the terms of this Agreement. The City also agrees to retain such financial accounts, documents, and records for five (5) years following termination of this Agreement. 2. The City, within thirty (30) days of notification from County of its audit findings, may dispute the audit findings in writing to County and provide County with records and/or documentation to support the expenditure claims. County shall review this documentation and make a final determination as to the validity of the expenditures. E. Notices and Approvals All notices and approvals shall be directed to and made by the following representatives of the parties: To the Department: Parks and Recreation Attn: Norma E. Garcia, Deputy Director Planning & Development Agency 510 South Vermont Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90020 To City: Name: Address: F. Severability/Effective Date/Governing Law/Counterparts/Nondiscrimination If any provision of this Agreement, or the application thereof, is held to be invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of the Agreement that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of the Agreement are severable. The effective date of this Agreement shall be the date that the Agreement is executed by the Department's Director. This Agreement will be be governed by and construed in accordance with California laws. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. The City shall not discriminate against any person on the basis of race, color, sex, sexual orientation, age, religious belief, national origin, marital status, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or place of residence in the use of the Engagement Funds paid to the City pursuant to this Agreement. G. Independent Status. This Agreement is not intended and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture or association as between County and City. City understands and agrees to bear the sole responsibility and liability for furnishing Workers' Compensation benefits to any person for injuries arising from or connected with services performed on behalf of City pursuant to this Agreement. H. Compliance with Law Ok 1184451.3 2 City's completion of the Project shall conform to and abide by all County ordinances and all State and Federal laws and regulations insofar as the same or any of them are applicable; and where permits and/or licenses are required for City's work, the same must be first obtained from the regulatory agency having jurisdiction thereover. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has executed this Agreement, or caused it to be duly executed by its authorized representative, and the County by order of its Board of Supervisors, has delegated to the Director of Parks and Recreation, or his designee, the authority to execute this Agreement on its behalf on the date and year written below. CITY Name: Date Title: APPROVED AS TO FORM FOR THE CITY: as Name: Date Title: COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES By: Norma E. Garcia Date Deputy Director APPROVED AS TO FORM FOR THE COUNTY: MARY C. WICKHAM Interim County Counsel Sy Claudia Gutierrez, Deputy County Counsel Qin EXHIBIT A CITY: BALDWIN PARK STUDY AREA: 02124 ($2,500) EXHIBIT B Community Engagement Plan (See attached) STAFF REPORT AL 01 HUS OF 4 T 11,E �AN,GABWEL la AL LEY TO: ITEM NO. *7 FROM: Michael,rayi let 01 1`01tee DATE: November 18, 2015 SUBJECT: APPROVE A RESOLUTION EXERCISING THE OPTION TO WITHDRAW FROM THE LOS ANGELES REGIONAL INTEROPERABLE COMMUNICATION (LA-RICS) JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY (JPA SUMMARY Oil March 4, 2009, the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park approved and adopted Resolution No. 2009- 003, authorizing the City of Baldwin Park to join the Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communications System (LA-RICS) Joint Powers Atithority (JPA) as an establishing inernber. At Ole f'ortnatioii of the ],A-R](`,S JPA, there was no accurate estimation as to the operational cost ol.'Ihe systetil, The latest models 01, the operational, adstrative,, and build -mit cost have convinced the (.1i ief'ot'Pol ice tivat a C0111i'llicd P.fftllers[lil) in this system is not in t[ic best Imancial, technical, and operational interest of the city. FISCAL IMPA( 1' None, tin less, the City elects to remain a member of the LA-RICS JPA, in which case the financial impact is substantial and estimates, although not final, appear in the narrative below. I R E CEM M M F', �Nl) Arl 0 N Staffrecommends that tile City Council: Waive the reading and adopt by title only the Resolution No, 2015-100, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK EXERCISING ITS OPTION TO WITHDRAW FROM THE LOS ANGELES REGIONAL INTEROPERABLE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM (LA-RICS) JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY (JPA);" 2, Direct the Chief Executive Officer, or his designee, to issue a notice of such option to the LA-RICS Board prior to the November 24, 2015, the Opt -Out expiration date; and 3. Direct the Chief of Police to explore other options concerning Radio (LMR) and Data (LTE) services and capabilities. BACKGROUND The [,A-RICS JPA was formed in 2009 to allow public safety agencies throughout Los Angeles County to communicate with one another on a unified Land Mobile Radio (LMR) system; a broadband communications systema ref"erred to as Long '[erre I-M,Aution (L,TF) was added to the project later. Currently the Baldwin Park f)olice Department, tlie Los Angeles County Fire Department and other agencies communicate with one another by Ilse of.'(1ispatclier-to-(,Iispitcl.,ier laad line, or at critical incidents with the use of available radio to radio conimLinications, "I'lle Baldwin [)ark Polioc Department is unaware of any communications issues encountered under the current radio system resulting in any lack of communication between our police and fire departments or any other law enforcement agency. In order to build the LTE system, LA-RICS will need to erect and maintain 232 LTE Antenna sites which will essentially be a dedicated cellular data system for law enforcement and public safety agencies completely separate from commercial 1-n-ovider cellular data systems. Iiere will also be tradilimial radio anMinas For the LMR radio system for police and fire agencies. hiiiially, one of these towers had a proposed placement site within the City Hall complex, which could have provided some x" Honorable Mayor and CitT Cotinciltnenibers FROM: Michael,rayi let 01 1`01tee DATE: November 18, 2015 SUBJECT: APPROVE A RESOLUTION EXERCISING THE OPTION TO WITHDRAW FROM THE LOS ANGELES REGIONAL INTEROPERABLE COMMUNICATION (LA-RICS) JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY (JPA SUMMARY Oil March 4, 2009, the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park approved and adopted Resolution No. 2009- 003, authorizing the City of Baldwin Park to join the Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communications System (LA-RICS) Joint Powers Atithority (JPA) as an establishing inernber. At Ole f'ortnatioii of the ],A-R](`,S JPA, there was no accurate estimation as to the operational cost ol.'Ihe systetil, The latest models 01, the operational, adstrative,, and build -mit cost have convinced the (.1i ief'ot'Pol ice tivat a C0111i'llicd P.fftllers[lil) in this system is not in t[ic best Imancial, technical, and operational interest of the city. FISCAL IMPA( 1' None, tin less, the City elects to remain a member of the LA-RICS JPA, in which case the financial impact is substantial and estimates, although not final, appear in the narrative below. I R E CEM M M F', �Nl) Arl 0 N Staffrecommends that tile City Council: Waive the reading and adopt by title only the Resolution No, 2015-100, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK EXERCISING ITS OPTION TO WITHDRAW FROM THE LOS ANGELES REGIONAL INTEROPERABLE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM (LA-RICS) JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY (JPA);" 2, Direct the Chief Executive Officer, or his designee, to issue a notice of such option to the LA-RICS Board prior to the November 24, 2015, the Opt -Out expiration date; and 3. Direct the Chief of Police to explore other options concerning Radio (LMR) and Data (LTE) services and capabilities. BACKGROUND The [,A-RICS JPA was formed in 2009 to allow public safety agencies throughout Los Angeles County to communicate with one another on a unified Land Mobile Radio (LMR) system; a broadband communications systema ref"erred to as Long '[erre I-M,Aution (L,TF) was added to the project later. Currently the Baldwin Park f)olice Department, tlie Los Angeles County Fire Department and other agencies communicate with one another by Ilse of.'(1ispatclier-to-(,Iispitcl.,ier laad line, or at critical incidents with the use of available radio to radio conimLinications, "I'lle Baldwin [)ark Polioc Department is unaware of any communications issues encountered under the current radio system resulting in any lack of communication between our police and fire departments or any other law enforcement agency. In order to build the LTE system, LA-RICS will need to erect and maintain 232 LTE Antenna sites which will essentially be a dedicated cellular data system for law enforcement and public safety agencies completely separate from commercial 1-n-ovider cellular data systems. Iiere will also be tradilimial radio anMinas For the LMR radio system for police and fire agencies. hiiiially, one of these towers had a proposed placement site within the City Hall complex, which could have provided some LA-RICS JPA November 18, 2015 Page 2 monetary relief in the form of hard match rebates, but was later rescinded when the city and the JPA could not come to an agreement on tower specifications. At the time of formation of the JPA, there was no accurate estimation as to the construction or operational cost of the system. The uncertainty over cost was due to uncertainty as to technical design, (LTE, LMR, Wi-Fi, etc.), the geographic area that the system would cover, and the number of antennas and other system delivery devices required, and there locations. Accordingly, many cities successfully lobbied that there be a period whereby agencies could "Opt-Out" or withdraw from participation in the JPA after the cost of the system were more accurately defined (Section 5.01 of the JPA Agreement). Per the adopted funding plan approved on May 28, 2014, the cost to the city was set at $5,928 for FY14/15 (Administrative cost only), $13,349 for FY 15/16 (Admin and LTE data cost only), and $31,909 FY 17/18 (Admin, LTE, and LMR cost upon full build out). The annual costs escalate through FY 29/30 when such annual cost peak at $67,370. The total sum of the system operational costs for the FY 31/32 lifetime of the system for the city of Baldwin Park Police Department is $951,146. The attached chart provides a summation of cost identified in LA-RICS adopted Funding Plan for Baldwin Park Police radio and data services through FY31/32; YEAR_, ADMIN ..... LMR LTE ........ TOTAL 14/15 5,928 --- -- 5,928 15/16 6,046 7,303 13,349 16/17 6,167 --._ 25,742 31,909 17/18 6,291 2,222 26,362 38,874 18/19 6,416 13,321 26,907 46,644 19/20 6,545 13,072 28,454 48,071 20/21 6,676 26,072 28,831 61,579 21/22 6,809 26,119 29,304 62,233 22/23 6,945 26,020 29,787 62,753 23/24 7,084 25,922 30,280 63,286 24/25 7,226 25,972 30,782 63,980 25/26 7,370 25,876 31,294 64,541 26/27 7,518 25,928 31,817 65,263 27/28 7,668 25,982 32,350 65,999 28/29 7,822 25,889 32,893 66,604 29/30 7,978 25,944 33,448 67,370 30/31 8,138 26,000 28,846 62,984 31/3 ' 00 _ , ,1 ........... 3 TOTAL 126,928 340,399 483,822 951,146 Additionally, there is a "Hard Match" cost each year through FY 29/30 (Total through FY 29/30 is $76,857). The Hard Match contribution may be met through contributions of assets, such as antennas, radio frequencies, antenna sites, etc., owned by the City of Baldwin Park. LA-RICS has yet to establish a value of these assets, however, the Hard Match annual contribution for Baldwin Park has been set at $4,521. It is also worth noting that the cost and figures put forth by LA-RICS assume certain grant funding remains available to subsidize the system. More importantly, the current configuration of the system is premised on 82 cities and other agencies in Los Angeles County remaining as participants in the LA-RICS system. As members withdraw from the system, which we know is occurring (Currently 23 cities as of the last JPA report), the cost borne by the remaining participating cities will rise. Additionally, if certain strategic assets and locations are lost by agencies withdrawing, the system may need to be redesigned and cost adjusted LA-RICS JPA November 18, 2015 Page 3 accordingly. In a letter to the city (Attached), the JPA also acknowledges additional unknown fees which will be passed on to the JPA members from loans made to the JPA. There are additional equipment costs which the city would incur. Our current dispatch console radio, mobile unit radio's (55), and handheld radio's (100) would all need to be upgraded are replaced, along with in-unit computers (30) known as Mobile Data Terminals (MDT's), to be compatible with the LA-RICS system. This cost is estimated at approximately $900,000. The cost to the City of Baldwin Park for the use of the LA-RICS System by the Los Angeles County Fire Department has not yet been published. Due to the method of calculation used (i.e., '/2 of Baldwin Park square mileage and '/z of Baldwin Park population being attributed to Baldwin Park police use of the LA-RICS system; the other '/2 of population and 1/2 of square mileage would be attributed to the Fire Department use.) It is anticipated the Fire Department will incur an amount equal to that of the Police Department. Accordingly, it is possible the Los Angeles Fire Department will pass through to the City of Baldwin Park, the amounts equal to the above annual cost for police radio service, as indicated above, although this has not been determined. As for LTE coverage, the City of Baldwin Park is a subscriber to data services with AT&T Wireless, utilizing the nationwide network. The LTE data services provide ability to utilize in car computers and dispatching along with newer police tools such as field fingerprinting, photo sharing in patrol cars, and other secondary data. The Department has had no issues concerning coverage. As LTE technology has advanced, the City has not had to make any capital investment in such upgrades, the cost being borne by AT&T. From a disaster management standpoint, Baldwin Park has not experienced any issues with the AT&T system being unusable in an emergency situation to date, such as an earthquake or other mass-usage event. From an operational prospective, LMR (Radio) communications is the primary tool for day to day and emergency operations, LTE serving as a secondary method of information transfer. Accordingly, based on the foregoing, at this time the Chief of Police does not believe it is in the best financial, technical, and operational interest of the City of Baldwin Park to remain a member of the LA-RICS, thus is recommending withdrawal from the LA-RICS JPA. If the city chooses to join LA-RICS at a later time, it may do so, but the cost for doing so has yet to be determined LEGAL REVIEW This report has becti reviewed and approved by the City Attorney as to legal form and content. ALTERNATIVES Staff will seek all available options to include: Option #1) Take no action and continue use of current radio system and remain with AT&T for LTE data services. Option #2) Continue to explore other options in use by other local police agencies. ATTACHMENTS • 2009 LA-RICS JPA AGREEMENT • 6-14-2014 LA-RICS FUNDING PLAN • 6-2-2014 LA-RICS FUNDING LETTER (Executive Summary) • Resolution No. 2015-100 RESOLUTION NO. 2015-100 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK EXERCISING ITS OPTION TO WITHDRAW FROM THE LOS ANGELES REGIONAL INTEROPERABLE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM (LA-RICS) JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY (JPA) WHEREAS, the City of Baldwin Park entered into the Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communications System ("LA-RICS") Joint Powers Agreement on March 4, 2009 for the purpose of developing and implementing a modern, integrated wireless voice and data communications system for first responders and local mission -critical personnel within the los Angeles Region; WHEREAS, the latest models of the LA-RICS' operational, administrative, and build -out cost have convinced the City that a continued partnership in the LA-RICS JPA is not in the best financial, technical, and operational interest of the City and its residents; WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 5.01 a member agency may withdraw from the LA-RICS JPA within thirty-five days (by November 24, 2015) after the Funding Plan is adopted consistent with Section 6.01, "Withdrawal by Member." NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the City Council does hereby exercise its option to withdraw from the Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communications System Joint Powers Authority consistent with Section 5.01 and Article VI of the Joint Powers Agreement entered into on March 4, 2009. Section 2. That the Chief Executive Officer or designee shall immediately give and cause to be delivered written notice to the LA-RICS Joint Powers Authority of the City's withdrawal from the LA-RICS JPA. Section 3. That the City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of the Resolution and shall cause the same to be processed in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 18"' day of November, 2015. MANUEL LOZANO MAYOR ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ss, CITY OF BALDWIN PARK I, ALEJANDRA AVILA, City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution 2015-100 was duly and regularly approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park at a regular meeting of the City Council held on November 18, 2015, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:. ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS. ALEJANDRA AVILA, CITY CLERK LA-RICS Funding Plan Table of Contents ExecutiveSummary...................................................................................... Introduction.................................................................................................. Section 1. Funding Plan Overview .............................. ...... — ......... ............., Section 2. Background Research................................................................. Section 3. Member Outreach...................................................................... Section 4. Cost Allocation Method.............................................................. Section 5. Data Monitoring and True -Up Period ..... ......... ..........„....,..,.,...... List of Tables Table 1. Variables for LMR and LTE Cost Allocation Formulas .,... List of Figures Figure 1. Cost Allocation Formula.................................w.....,,....,........... Appendices ...............1 13 .......15 ...............15 15 ...,....25 ..... ............ 21 ..,. — 23 Appendix 1— March 6, 2014— Draft Funding Plan Appendix 2 —April 3, 2014— Board -Authorized Modifications Appendix 3 — May 7, 2014 — Board Item on Comments Received on Draft Plan; Summary of Comments Received from Authority Members During 60 -Day Comment Period Appendix 4—August 15, 2013, LMR Board Letter and March 6, 2014, LTE Board Letter LA-RICS Funding Plan Page i LA-RICS Funding Plan Executive Summary The Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communication System (LA-RICS) is a modern, integrated wireless voice and data communication system designed to serve law enforcement, fire service, and health service professionals throughout Los Angeles County. LA-RICS is a joint powers authority (Authority) with 86 Members currently, including the County of Los Angeles, 82 cities, two school districts, and the University of California, Los Angeles. LA-RICS comprises two independent systems, which include a voice (land mobile radio, or LMR) system and a broadband data (long-term evolution, or LTE) system. LA-RICS will provide day-to- day communications within agencies and allow seamless interagency communications for responding to routine, emergency, and catastrophic events. Per the Joint Powers Agreement (Agreement) adopted in 2009, the Authority must develop and adopt a Funding Plan before it commits resources to constructing the LMR or LTE systems (Ref. Art. II, Sec. 2.04(b) and Sec. 2.05(b)(2); and Art. V, Sec. 5.01). This Funding Plan has been a long time in the making, given the Agreement specified that the Authority would use its "best efforts to develop and adopt within nine (9) months of the effective date of the Agreement ... a Funding Plan specifying a means or formula for funding the construction, operation and maintenance of the System" (Ref. Art. II, Section 2.05(b)(2)). The Funding Plan must identify "funding sources and mechanisms" (Art. V, Sec. 5.01). In particular, the Funding Plan must "specify a means or formula for funding the construction, operation and maintenance of the System; such Funding Plan shall include an allocation of costs among the Members, subscribers and other funding sources" (Art. II, Sec. 2.05(b)(2)). Further, the Funding Plan must provide a "development schedule and phasing plan, which will permit the maximum feasible participation by Members" (Art. V, Sec. 5.01). This latter requirement in the Agreement recognizes the great diversity among Members in the caliber of their LMR and existing broadband systems, as well as in their ability to internally support capital improvements and maintenance. The Funding Plan presents LMR capital costs of approximately $205 million and annual costs of approximately $11 million for operations and capital replacement. It also addresses LTE capital costs of approximately $150 million, additional capital costs of approximately $17 million for additive alternates, and annual costs of approximately $10 million for operations and excludes capital replacement. The Funding Plan must identify funding sources and a means for allocating these costs among the Members. The Funding Plan relies on grant monies for the initial construction of the LMR and LTE systems. Member fees are to be the revenue source for the operations and maintenance (0&M) as well as all other capital costs. Voter assessments are not currently practical given the high cost of a ballot campaign coupled with high voter requirements to pass a special revenue measure. The LMR and LTE program costs can be divided into an infrastructure (initial capital or capital replacement) component and an 0&M component. The financing model seeks to apportion costs to the Members relative to each Member's ratio of population and geographic factors. As LA-RICS Funding Plan Page 1 LA-RICS Funding Plan stakeholder survey results revealed that Members do not prefer a fixed fee that is not tied to a Member's specific impact to the communications system, the Funding Plan incorporates one or more measurable characteristics (population and geography) as a tool to determine each Member's revenue contribution. The Draft Funding Plan was authorized for release for comment to the Authority's Members on March 6, 2014, The Draft Funding Plan is attached as Appendix 1. On April 3, 2014, the Authority Board released a revised Cash Flow, which contemplated the Capital Replacement Reserve for the LMR System being deferred, with no accumulation, until the beginning of the fourth year of system operation. An administrative cost allocation for ongoing support of the Authority Operations at 20% of the overall administrative cost was included in the revision. This information is attached as Appendix 2. The Board received a number of comments on the Draft Funding Plan during the 60 -day comment period, a matrix of which is attached as Appendix 3. In consideration of the feedback received during the 60 -day comment period, the Draft Funding Plan was updated to reflect the responses to this information as well as input from the Finance Committee and Authority Board. The Funding Plan's cost allocation is based on the following: • All costs for administration, operations and maintenance, capital replacement, and hard match are calculated based on the population and geographic area of the Member agency. These two variables are weighted equally at 50% each. The Funding Plan is predicated on Members participating in the system, and the contribution from each Member will be calculated on the number participating. The initial Cash Flow presented is predicated on full participation of every Member of the Authority. That is, the Member shares will be calculated assuming every potential Member is paying its indicated annual share. However, the Authority acknowledges that some Members may exercise their right to withdraw as allowed under the Agreement. A Member may make a financial decision to delay participation until such time as their communication system equipment completes its normal replacement cycle and thus the agency's capital investment is fully amortized. The Opt - Out Period for the Funding Plan is 180 calendar days from March 28, 2014, the date of adoption of the Funding Plan by the Authority's Board. The Authority's Board also set the 180 day period for withdrawal of Members, as provided for in Article V, Section 5.01 of the Agreement. In addition, the Funding Plan is required to be revisited in three years from date of adoption. As part of this requirement, LA-RICS will be required to evaluate the current cost allocation method and the system usage data and to determine whether any changes to the Funding Plan are required. For every Member that chooses not to participate, its annual share of the cost must be assumed by the Authority should total system costs be higher than the revenues collected from early participating Members. Each year an agency does not become a Member or join LA-RICS, its allocated but unpaid cost share of the LTE hard match and LMR capital replacement will accumulate. In this instance, bridge financing may be required to make up the difference. LA-RICS Funding Plan Page 2 LA-RICS Funding Plan Alternatively, early participating Members will likely absorb the costs of nonparticipants, resulting in a higher cost for the early Members. Should a Member rejoin the Authority at a later date, the Authority's Board will develop policy that addresses late adopters. Some Members may have special radio or broadband coverage challenges (e.g., hilly terrain or clusters of tall buildings) that the standard backbone systems would be unable to meet. Those Members may require additional sites or facilities for an acceptable level of service. If so, those Members, and not LA-RICS, unless otherwise agreed to by the Authority's Board, may be responsible for the costs of building and maintaining these facilities. To the extent possible, LA-RICS will provide Bounded Area coverage enhancements. In -Building coverage will also be the responsibility of the Member agency that desires the coverage, unless otherwise agreed to by the Authority's Board. (Note that this does not preclude LA-RICS from being the agency that does the actual work of constructing or maintaining these facilities.) LA-RICS Funding Plan Page 3 Joint Powers Agreement to Establish TO'e Los -Angeles Regional Interoperable Cgrnmunidati.ons System Authority THIS -JOINT POWERS S: AGREEMENT (t * he "Agreement") is rYiad'60s of the- Effective Dq,te by and 4pt#p.pn thpvbli agencies: p p e "Gi es: set forth in Exhibit. A. Each public agehby executing this Agreement shall bo referred: (6 Individually as "Member," with all referred to` collectively as "Members," RECITALS: Whereas .the Mi§rnbefsteq#e, wide area and thtbroperablo coftiriiiAhidati6ns ', and Members- acting independently have limited :resources to: cobstructa. communications network providing these capabilities', and, Whereas the Miprnbdrs. hei.Via- determined that Work1rig in concert to share radio communications; fl- ons resources is i ' n the public interest, as:doing so would provide the rbOt effective and oconomica.l,radlo commonic-at . lons. network for all partlelpitffig public agencies; afid, Whereas the Members agree that the,coll.ective, goal is to evaluate, establish-, and - participate in a pub] . ib,,,safety radio network to meet or enhance clurro, nt public safety radio coandnicbtlioris needs of Members and to pr0VIde an architecture capable of expanding to me-etfutUrb needs; arid, Whereas, the Members have the authority under the 4oint. Exercise of Powers:Act, in California. Government 'Code -8ecti6h 6600 et. seq., (the "Act"). it) enter info thi's Agreement.. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration 'bf the recitals and mutual obl.1gati6ns of the Meh,ibel's, as.. heroin contalnedi the Mehlbors agree as foll6ws: Article. A A . I - GENERAL PROVISIONS. 1.01 Purpose. This. Agreement is to crqqto,an agency to exercise the powers Shared in common by its Membd'rs to engeigi4 in"f6giohal and cooperatiVo. planning and coordination of governmental services to establish ei wide -area interoperable public safety communications network: (hereinafter referred to as the "Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Cornmunic-66ons System", "LARIC.8!!, or the "System"),. As part of this, LA.Rlb$ JPA 2Obg-'01 -05 Page 1 Joint Powers Agreement LA. RIGS purpose,- Members -will see.k to ineet or enhance the current public safety communlcations needs with a System capable of expanding to meet fiuture needs; develop funding mechanisms; and resolvetechnical and operational issues in the development and management of the System. Such pdrposes are to. be accomplished and said common power exercised in tha manner lierebnafter set forth. 1.02 Coation of Authority. VLAtspant to the dict, the Mei bers hereby create a publio entity to be known as t116 °1.os Angeles Reg oval hiteroperable Communications 8ystern Autiaority" h,ereinattor, the "Authority'). The Authority shall be a public entity separate and` apart fr6i,6 the Members who -shall administer this Agreernent.349 jurisdiction of -the Authority shall be all territory within the geographic boundaries raf. the Nlerrthers-, however the ALrthority may undertake any action outslde such geographlo bot.tt1darles, as. is necessary and Incidental to the accotyipllOfhent of Its pui°pose. 1,01 Membership in the Authority. Participafion In the Authority is limited to public agencies,, as defined by the Act, in the greater Los Angeles area that have approved slid executed this -Agreement, and contributed resources of any kind toward the construction and/or on-going operation of the System (including, but not limited'to financial, personnel, frequency; equipment, radio site, real estate or other resoUrces), as approved by the Board of, Directors: 1.04 Term. This Agreement shall become. effective, and the Authority shall come into existence, when each of the following occurs (the "Effective Date"): (a) The Agreement is authorized and executed by the City of Los Angelos and the County of Los. Angeles; and (b) Forty-five days bias elapsed after fhe authorization and execution. of the Agreement by both the City of Los,Angeles and County of Los Angeles. Prior to the Effective Date, public agencies may become: Members of the Authority, without Board approval, by adoption and execution of this Agreement. After the Effective: Date,; membership is subject to approval by the Board as set forth in Section 7.02(a) of this document. LA•RICS JPA 200901.05 Page 2 Joint Powers AgIrbeilldrit 'F4 Ak,'-Id LA -RIGS Article H. - Board of Directors. 2.'01 Co'Mposition of the Board t The Authority shall be. administeredadministeredby a Board of Directors (the '`.lord") c6nsis ind..-of -a. minimum of eight (8) Directors rectors and'. not we than seventeen (17), Directors- identified by the f6l�lowing appointing aUfhorifles:. The City of Los Angeles City Administrative Officer 2, The City of Log Angeles Etre -Ch lef 8. The City of Los Angeles. Police Chief 4.. The City of Log Angel6g Chief Legislative Analyst 6, The County of Los: ngeles Ghl.ef-Exec.utiVe Officer 6, The County -of Los Angel . es Fire Chief The Sheriff of Los Ahoeles County The County of Los Angeles D&P'artmbht of Health Services Director 9,;, The Loq-,AngqtqP Unified School District Police, Chief 10. The City of Long Beach 11. The Los Angeles Area R6 Chie'fg Association 1.2, The Lp,§- Andple ' s County PoliceChiefs:Assoolatloh 113. The California Contract Cities Association 14 At Large 16. At Large 16. At Large 17. At Large 2.02 Appolihtfbdrit of Directors (a) Each of the officials listed in IIIII-QUgh 9 above may appoint one.birecfo.r and. bilb Alternate Director to the. Board Wh6n the agehcJy such official represents becomes a Member. (b) The City. of Lohg Bbach may appoint one. Director and one Alternate Director to the Board when the City of-. Long Pe.a.ch becomes a Member. (o)Each of the Assbblatioiis 116teW In 11 and 12 above tray appoint viaeDirector ail , d one Alternate Director to the Board when at least otlal-,hem_ber of (heir respective Association becomes a- Member of the Authority; (0) The California Conteact Cities Association May. appoint one Dlroctbt.and one Alternate Director to the Board when at least one member o: f the Association bd'dbmes-aMember of'thoAuthority. In. order to participate in the selection process, Association Members must also be Members -of the Authority, LA-R(CS�JPA 2069 -Di -06 Page 3 Jolh.t Powers Agreement LA -RIGS (e) At Large Directors and Alternate MeQjtors, Shall 09 selected. by a majority vote of Member cities, other than the,cities of Los Angeles and Long Beach, as follows, (1) One At Large Director- (and one Alternate Director) must represent a Membbroity thA foperates. both independent pQlloe and fire- departments; (2), Two At Largo Directors (and two Alternates) MU (' ropres6nt Meiiiber cities that operate an III depoildontpolice departniont ptiftr an independent fire department;' and (3) One At Large rge Director ' (and one Alternate Director) must represent a 'MeMber city not otherwise represented on the Board. Within fifteen (1 5) days after the Effective, Date, Oflblo M e Ig _qrnb r cities shall endeavor to Meet and provide, for the selection of the At Large Directort and AltOrhatO Qlre6tors,,andiall other entities shall endeavor to aPOO!"t'their 01"6GtOrs and Altel,tia . tes.- The logistics for filling the At L*g6 Director and Alternate Director vacanclos Shall be pr(ivi I ded for inthe bylaws. (g) At the time-of.appointment and for the dUfEktloh of servlce, Ditect&s and Alternate DireQtors shall be employees or officers of Member,5., All Directors and Alternate Directors shall be non -elected officials., with the solez exception- of the Los, Ahdb[6's CoUnty Sheriff. (h) The, term of office of each Director and Alternate Directo.r shall.: be two years, or until a successor has been appofhted.'- Directors and AltdtnatO Directors. may 'serve an unlimited number of terms,. (i) No Member can hold More than one seat on the, board concurrently, except that the County of. Los Angeles- and the City of Los Ahgel6s can hold the Board seats designated by theeight individuals listed in items I through 8- in Section 2:01. An Alternate Director. may act lh their Director's abg6nce. and shall exercise all .rights and privileges of a Director. (k) Each DROQtOr a ' fid each Altbrnat6 Director shall serve at the pleasure of the appointing authority, and may be removed by the appointing authority at any time without notice. Notice of any removal or appointment of a, Director brAltierhate. Director shall be provided in writ . i . Og-to the Chair of the Board. 2.03 Purpose of Board. The general. 00rp6se of the Board 18 to: - LA -W8, iPA-2009.01-06 Page 4 Joint Powers Agreement 11LA-RIGS Provide structure for administrative and fiscal oversight; Identify and pursue funding. sources; (G)- Set 00116y; (d) Maxim"Ize the. utilization of available resources; and (e) Qvorsee ally Committee activities" 2.04 Specific Responsibilities of the Board. Board.. shall be as-follows;,.The specific responsibilities of the 8 o (a) Identify participating entities needs and requirements.;. '(1i), Develop and lirriptemont a funding phn (the "Funding Plan") for -the construction and on-going op,er'atidn of a, sho(edvblde and 'data system; (6)-. Formulate and adopt the budget. prior, to the bornMencementof the fiscal year; (d) Hire necessary and sufficient staff and adopt personnel- rules and regulations; (e) Adopt rules for procuring supplies, edIuiprpent. arta. services; Adopt rules for the disposal of surplus property; Establish Committees as necessary to ensure that the: interests and.concerns of each qs6r'anenGy are represented and to ensure operational, t6chrilbal and financial issues- are thoroughly researched and analyzed, - (b) Provide for System implementation and monitoring", (i)- Determine the most appropriate and cost effective maintenance plan for the. System; 6) Provide for System maintenance; (k) Adopt and reAse System operating policies and procedures; as well as technical and maintenance requirements; (1), Review and * adopt ' recommendations regarding the establi.811ment,of System priorities and talk groups; W Address concerns of all. System user agbdc.les-,` (n) OV.ersee the establishment of long-range plans; LA -RIGS JPA 2009-01-05 Page.6 Joint. P9wers, Agreement. LA -RIGS. (o) Conductand oversee System audits at intervals not to exceed three years; (p) Ayrange:for an annual indeppriden,t fiscal audit,: (q) Adopt such bylaws, rules andregulations as. are necessary for the; purposes: herpQ.f, p w provided tbat,notWing in the bylaws, rqlls and regplbtions-shall be incohsistont With this Agroment;:and.. (r) Discharge other duties ap:appropriate; orre'qUlred by statute: 2.05 Startup Re.§pcitiMbilities Th specified tiniefrarhe or,. if v . .0 The Authority -shall have the duty to do the foII6\ivlhg within the no time. is specified, within a reasonable time: (a), To, establish within three (3) months of the Eff6dtive Date of thip-Agteem'ent. the Advisory' Committees designated In Section 3.07; (b) To use Its, best efforts to d&6100 an ' d adopt within -nine (9) months of the r_ffeatiVo Date' offlils Agreornent: (1) A 'Ian specifying a means or f6rmUla fior determining. the; timing and P - 9 R. - - sequencing of constructiqn.of the System consistent with the functional specifications, and (2) A FunOing Plan specifying a 1,lieans or formula for funding the cbnsirUctlon, Operation and maintenance, of the,8ystorn; Such Funding Plan shall include on allocation of Costa among the MeMbefs, sUbMdbers, and other funding sources; pps; (o) To establish System participation pricing' Including start-up costs, and ongoing Sub * b to 6.'vee System ooeititiohs:. to'ch1h IbW uogr6dbs,.,�hd Subscriber/Member ' ber unit OrIcIr.) .0 System replagement reserves; To enq(j' rpother, governmental and quasi7bvornm6ntal agencies, including but not limited to, the: State and Federal government, and special districts. to participate in LARICS; To establish policies and procedures for the voluhtary transfet and/or sh0fitig of assets sets from MenAbe:f-!§.; (Q To retain legal counsel; and (g) To evaluate the need for, acquire and maintain necessary insurance. LA-RICS JPA 2009-01-06 pagb 6 Joint Powers Agreement ll !A-RfCS 2,06 Meetings of the Board. (a) Regular Meetings. The BQard shall provide for its regu6'ar mea�tings provided, however,, that at.least one regular meeting shall be held quarterly. The date, hour and location of r agulat moatings shall be.fixed by resolution of the Board and a copy- of opyof the resolution shall he transmitted'.to each of the McMbem. (bj Special Meetings. Special meetings of the Board may be. called. by the. Chair or as provided for in the bylaws. () Call, Notice and Conduct of Moethigs, All meetings of the Board, including Without limitation, n, regular-; adjourned' regUlar and special mebtings, shall be called noticed; held and conducted. in accordance with the provision$ of the Ralph M. Brown Act (commencing with California Government Code section l00), As soon as practicable, but rio later than the tulle of posting, the Secretary shall provide notice and the agenda to each Member,, Director and Afternata Director, (d) first Meeting. The first Meetirig of the Board shall be no, sooner than fifteen (15) days after the Effective Date; 2.01 Minutes. The Secretary shall cause to be kept minutes of the meetings'.of the Board and shall, as soon as practicable after each meeting; cause a cop' of the minutes to be made. avaflFj'lale to, each Director, the Members and other parties upon request. 2.0$ Vot%ng. All voting:power o.fthe Authority shall reside, in the Board; Each Director shall have one Vote, An Alternate Director may participate and. vote in the proceedings of the ,hoard only., in the absence of that Aiternate''s Di.rectbr: Nd absentee:ballot or proxy shall be permitted. 2.09. Quorum; Required Votes; Approvals. A, majority of the appointed Directors shall co-IIStiti.ite a rlu6r. 4m of the Board for the: traosaction of business except that less than a quorutll or the Secretary may adjourn meetings of the Board from time -to -time, The affirmative -votes of a ma)'ority of the ' al pointed Directors shall be required to take any action by the Board; except, two-thirds vote (or such greater vote as required, by state: law) of the appointed Directors shall be a°equired io take e any action ort the following: (a) Establish:start--up contribUtions from Members; (b) Adopt` a Fundirig Plan; LA -RIAS JPA 2009-01-05 Page 7 Joint Powers Agreement LA-RICS (q) Subj , ect to prior approval by the passage of arl, authorizing ordi na 11001 or other legally s ufficlentOct[on by the affected jurisdiction, levy. and collect, Or Cause to be collected, -onmqr�[cRtjdn-in act fee§ on new residential, comnorcial, andindustrial developmpnt, as authorized by -local,- state; and'. -'federal Iq (d) Change the designation of Treasurer or Audiior'of. the Authority; issue bonds or other forms of debt;' (f) Adopt, or amend the bylaws; and (g) Subject to prior- approval by the passage of all authorizing ordinance or other affected jurisdiction, legally sufficient. action by the a tion, exercise thd power of eminent domain. Article 111 OFFICERS,: EMPLOYEES AND ADVISORY COMMITTEES 3.01 Chairperson, Vice -Chairperson and Secretary. For each fi;scal'year; the Board shall elect Chalfoertbn and Vice -Chairperson from among the Directors, and shall appoint Et Secretary; who pood not be a Director. In the event that the Chairperson,: the Vice -Chairperson. or Seorptary so, elected resigns from such office or hijher repre ntodMe s 0 S -g6 Member cease 'to I b a Member of the Authority, ilie " ' resulting vacancy shall be filled at the next. regular mee tirid of tfio Board held after Such vacancy occurs or as- soon as practicable thereafter, Supceeding officers shall performi fheAuties normal to said offlce% The Choirpersort shall sign Oil contracts i On WWI` Of the:Authority, and shall porf&rh such other d0les as may be imposed by the Board', In tha,ab.sence of the, Chaiirppr�qon, the Vice-Cha1rp'er:sq'# shall sign contracts and pbrform all of the Chairperson's duties. 3.02 Treasurer. The he Treasurer and Tax Collector of the County of Los: Angeles shq[I be the Treasurer of the, Authority. To the extent permitted by the Act, the Board may change, by resolution, the Treasurer of the Authority. The Treasurershall be the depositoy, shall have custody of the. accounts, funds and Money of the'Authority froM. Whatever. source, and shall have the duties a ' lid obligat[Ons get forth in the Act. For grants awarded; to Members: 6r'.third parties for U§�O With the Sys . temi the, Treasurer will work with the Mehiber or third party- to out 14 plate appropriate fiscal controls to- meet the grant rqqLjlrements. LXRIC6 JPA 2069-01-05 N06 8 )&, JoInf'Powprs Agreement AN.11i LA -RIGS 3.03. Audit6r, The Auditbr-COntr011et of the Couhty of Los Angeles shall be the Auditor of the Authority. To the. extent pepiilt(6d lay the Act, the Board may change, byresolution, the. Auditor -Witor of the AW The Auditdr shall pericift the functions of audlior for the Authority and shall make or pause an independent annual qu Oitof the accounts and records of the Authority by 'a: certif(ed p0blic accountant, in com pjjaqcQ- with the recipirerneh.tp of the Act and goo-6tally accepted auditing standards. 3.04 Bondblig of Persons. laving Access to Property. Pursuant to, the Act, the Board shall designate the publio Officer or officers: or person or: p6osons, who have charge of, handle, or haVe ,access to any property of-Ilib Authority and shall t6q'pird such Opplic officer' or offlodrs or person Of persons to file an official bond in an amount to be f.(Xqd by the. Board, 3.05other Employees,: The Board shall have the, power b resolution to appoint and eftiploy. such other officers, y..- . . . I. . I.- . 0...... . - employees, consultants ohd independent contractors, as may be necessary to carry.-Qqt the ourpOser of this Agreement. 3.06 Privileges and Immunities from Lielbilityii Ali of the. privileges and.iniftnitios. fronY liability; exemption from laws, ordinances and rules, all pposloh, relief, disability, workoW. compensation on and oth'or b0heffig which apply tothe activities of offl(,,.ers`agents or employees of a public agency wh On e performing their rospectiVe fUnctlons shall apply to the officors, agents or ernploy e s. of the Authority to._ the same degree and extent while engaged In the performance of any of the.funo.tions and other 0!Ie$ of such: agents or employees: under this Agreement. Mono of the officers- agents or employees direqtly� 6mo[6y6d b.*V-the B�ipro shal - l'be deemed, by reason of their employment by the Board to be employed by t ' he, Membomor by reason of their employment by -the. Board, to be subject to anyofthe requirements of the MO-mbeirs.. 3.07 Advisory Committees. The.Board shall establish the fbIloWifig Advisory committees: (p) Operations (Jotjim Ittee — The Operations, Com rnittoe's primary purpose is to rdvidw and �ecoi-rirnerid W the, Board operating poI[cl61q'and procedures that will, ens . ure the System resources, are used efficiently to meet the, needs of all Members. (b) Technibal Gornmiltee— the Technical Unimitteies prihi6ify purpose is to review and recommend to.the Board policies and procedures relat6d to System performance, maintenance and other technical issues. CA-kidSJPA N09-01-06 Page 9, Jifllt,114 Joint Powers Agreement (c) Finance Committee -- The Finance Committee's primary purpose is to review and recommend to the Board. (1) :The Funding Plan; (2) A fiscal -year budget; and (3) Financial policies and procedures to ert"sule equitable contributions by Members, (d) Legislative Corrimittee — The Legislative Committee's primarypurpose is to revlew and, recommend to the Board a plan for securing funding from state and f6derai governments and, to, advise: the Board. on regulatory and legislative matters. 109 Membership: of Advisory -Committees. Each Director shall appoint one voting member to each Advisory Committee. 3.09 Meetings of Advisory. Committeas. All. meetings of each Advisory Corr►mittee shall be field in accordance with the Ralph M1 - Brown Act. For the purposes of convening meetings and conducting business, unless otherwise provided In the bylaws, a majority_ of the membors of the committee shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business, except that less than a quorum or= the secretary of each Advisory Committee may, adjourn meetings from time -to --time. As soon as practicable,, but no later than the time: of posting, the Secretary of Old Committee shall provide notice and the agenda to each Mbtnblr„, Director and Alternate Director. 3.11. Of#lc6 s of Advisory Committees. Unless`othetwise determined by the Boarci, each Advisory Committee ,iiJJ choose its officers, comprised of a Chairperson, a'dice-Chairperson and a Secretary,, Article IV POWERS 4.09. General Powers. The Authority shall have the powers common to the Members and which are necessary - or convenient to the aocomplishment:of the purposes. of this Agreement, subject to the restrictions set forth in Section 4.04. As provided in the Act-, the Authority shall be a public entity separate. from the Members. 4.02 Power to issue Bonds: The Authority shall have all of the powers provided in Articles 2 and 4: of Chapter 5', Division 7, Title .1 of the California Gbvernment:Code, including the power to issue bonds thereunder. LA -RIGS JPA 2003-01-05 page -10- Milt Powers Agreement blft-A LA-RICS 4.03 Specific POWGrS. Thb Authorityis hereby* authori2ed, in its own name, to perform all acts necessary for the exercise of the foregoing powers, inold'diON but not limited to,, any or all of the falloWrtg: - To: make arid 6ritat into contracts, including but not limited to; agreements - for the purpose of a.equiring real and-lor personal property,. equipment, -employment contracts and .. professional setvlcos agreements; (IJ) To make and tinter into contracts with s.ubsctibbrs. who desire to utilize the System for their primary radio communications and affIllates, who.desire. to utilize -the, System only -for mutual or.' automatic aid.,,, (C) To acquire; construct; maintain, or operate telecommunications systems or service and to. provide the equipment nocessmy toy (letIVOr Public services therefrom; .(d) To-acqtAire, construct; manage, maintain o.roperate any building, works. of 'improvements; (e) To acquire, .hold, lease, or dispose of property; To employ or engage; contractors; agents, or employees; To s0b, and be sued in its own name; (h) . To- app . ly for, receive and utilize grants and loans from federal, state or local d6Verhrnehtt orfrom any other available source in order to.pursue the purposes. of the Authority,! (1) To:i*ssue bonds acid to otherwise incur debts, liabilities. and obl(Oations-, provided that no such: bond, dot., I[ia'b.jIitV pt obligation ,;hall cohst(('Ot'e a d6btj I lbbility'dr obligation bliptlon to the individual respective Member (j)' To invest any M' ey in the treasury- pursuant to the Mt -which Is not required for the immediate necessities of the AuthQrity, as the Authority-Oet0mihes is: advisable, in the same manner and UI)OO, the same condltlolis as local agencies, Pursuant to Section 58601 of the California GoVernnioht'Oode; and (k) To-promulg'ato, addpt,'and enforce any rules and regulations, as, may be necessary and proper to implernent and effeCtLKIte the terms, provisions, and purposes ofthig-AgredMqint.. .LA... -P IGS JPA 20Q9 -01-O5 Page 11 Joint Powers Agreement AVIA Lig-RIGS 4.04 Limitation on Exercise of Powers.. All cornrimdn powers exercised by the Board shall bo exercised in a manner consistent with, and subject to, the restrictions and limitations upon the exerclse of suoh powers as are applicable to the County of Los. Angeles, as may be amended from time to 111,ine. 4,05 obligations of Authority. The debts, liab.ilifies and obligations of the Authority shall not be the debts, liabilities: acid obligatiolis of the Members. In addition, pursuant to tine.ct, no Director, shall be persona ly liable on the bonds or subjectto any persow.I liability 0r7aco0c.1ntabiiily by reason, of the issuance of bonds: 4.06. Additional Powers to be Exercised. in addition to those powers common to each of the Members; the Authority, shall have those powers that may be conferred upon it by subsequently enacted legislation. Aeticle-V _ CONTRIBUTIONS; ACCOUNTS: AND REPORTS, FUNDS 6.01 Adoption of Funding Plan. It is a critical go.af of the. Authority to develop a Funding Plan that identifies. funding sources and mechanisms, including a developnrentlschodule and phasing. plan, which will permit,the maximum feasible participation by Members. The Funding Plain shall be descriptive as to.the contributions requir_ed'from Members, Prior -to committing resources for the-consttuctlon ofthe System, a proposed Funding Pian as designated in Section 2.06(b)(2): shgll be developed. In ptder for the, Funding Pfan to be considered by the- Members prior to its.adopt on, the Board shall distribute the proposed: Funding, Plan to Members pursuant to Seotion 7.41. T11e proposed Funding Pian shall'oe accompanied by a descrip#ion of the; System, and reloits and studies to allow Memkers to determine the System capability, cost, f qi -going and the effects on individual Members. The Board shall also designate a: period, which shall be not less than 60 days; during which Members may provide. comments to the: Board regarding the proposed. Funding Plan. After the. comment period has expired, the Board may: (a) Adoptthe- Funding plan as proposed; (b) f evise the Funding Plan to address some or -all of the Merhber cori-mbnts; or (c) Reconsiderthe Funding Plan ata later date. LA-RICS JPA 2009.01-05 Page,12 Joint Powers Agreement kild LA-RICS Notice shall be given to Members pursuant to Section 7.01 within five days of adoption of We Funding Plan, The notice shall Include adopy of the adopted* Funding Plan. The Board shall also designate a period,: which shall b6. hot less than 35 days 00 the ronding, Plan is adopted, during which Members may submit: written notice o'f Inirn%ilate WithdraWal fi,offt. the ALithority. Thei-o Will' be no costs for airy Meiiiber that withdraws from the Authdrity'withih this . time period. After the Funding Plan has been adopted., and: until contracts are awarded to dbsjgn; and/or construct . t I lie Systern, if the, Funding, Plan is revised In a- manner Which will:substantial , IV i ncr( ,ase the financial ob , (Igatloos, of the Members, then any Member so. affKted will' have a further right to Vuitlhd.Jr4�,#Othfo ;q period designated by the Bbard, which._shall be not less than 45 days- after the adoption of the- Revised Fqilolhg Pkin, There Will be no costs for any Member that withdraWafrorn the -Authority withla this time period, except for obligations incurred prior to the adoption of 66 Revised Funding Plan. erl 02 Contributions. The Members may., iri the appropriate ciecurnstahce,_ of when required hereunder: (a) Make contributions butibris. from their treasuries for the purposes set forth herein: (b) Make payments of pqbIIG-fur)O§ to defray the cost: of -such purposes; (c) Make adVarides of Ou.blic fonds for such purposes;- such 6dVahces to be repaid as provided by written agreement, or (d) Use its pprsOnhel, equipment or property in Hou of"other contributions or advances. No Member shall bei required to adopt any tak,, assessment, fee or charge, under any 5.63Accounts and Reports.. The TreasUr6r shall establish ;And Maintain such funds and accounts as may be required y -a or by. any provision. 6f�qytrqstagreement.. . b good accounting practice entered into w . ith respect to the proceeds of any bonds. Issued -by the.-Authodty, The books and records of the Authority in the hands of the Treasurer shall be open to Ihspec ' tioh at all pea§6tifablei times by dUlY appointed representatives of the -Members. The Treasurer, within 180 days after the close. of each fiscal year; shbill, glO a 6ornbl.dte: written report of all. financial'activifies f6r such fiscal year to the Members.. 5.04 Funds,. 'The Treasurer shall_ receive, have custody of and/or disburse Authority funds in accordance with the laws applicable to public agencies and generally accepted LA -RIGS -JPA 2009-01-05, Page 13 Joint Powers Agreement kill LA-7R1CS accounting practices;- and shall make the disbursoments required by this Agreement in order to, carry outlany of the purposes of this Agreement. 5.05 Sharing of Frequericles. Members. holding Federal. Communication Carnmission (FCC) licehses to frequencies ("`l�icensee(s)`) shall authorize the Authority to snare the use of suc. i frogljenGib§ alldW radlo stotlons. Such use shall be In accordance, with the Code; of Federal Regufat%ons; (47 CFR 90.179). Any at.thorizati'on for the use of.such license shall bemade put' u,a j to a written. agreement between the Meruber and. Authority, .l evgking sr.rclr authori atio.() rorluires Mealiber to provide twelve (1 2) month& advance written notice to the Authority urlleSS otherwise identified in written agreement. Licenses shall remain primary to the Member holding the license. Only the Merrnber Is.ollowed to make any mod.1fications to its liter s (s) on behalf of the Authotity, and'the.Authority shall pay all associated fees. 6.00 Violations. PayrTrent of fines -and ponaltles:imposed for operational or equipment violatlons.shall be the, resporisibilityof the entity committing the violation. If the entity responsible for a violation is not the FCC Licensee, then the: responsible entity shalt -pay forthWith any fines imposed upon the Licensee, as specified in the bylaws. 5.07 System- Corppoh-Ohts. The System is compriseof components -that include physical plant, infrastructure, frequen(,les, user equipment, and dispatch center equlpment (the "Syster-n Components"), as described ier this Section 16 07. Wml)ers shall retain ownership of System Components that:they contribute to constrract or operate the System, unless otherwise agreed to in writing.. The Authority: shall retain„ ownership of Systenl° Components purchased by the Authority, Qnless otherwise acdree i to in writing,. (a) Physical Plant: The Physical Plant includes the following` real estate,. shelters; environmental controls; antenna support structures, power systems, security systems, and other site structu're's. The maintenance. of the Physical Plant shall. be in accordance with the requirements specified by the Authority and is the responsibility of the contributing Member, unless, otherwise agreed to in writing. (b) Infrastructure: Infrastructure includes the following: antenna syst6m% base station repeaters-, diagnostic and alarm systems, rrilcrdwa� a systems, backhaul systems, control equipmont and all other related electronic egiuiprnent and .sof tware.. The Authority is- responsible for the operation and maintenance of Infrastructure, (c} Frorll, encies: Frequencies are radio channels that have; been licensed by the FCC. in accordance with the Code of Federal tegulatlons. Licensees shrill authorize. LA-RICS-JPA 200$ 6.1.05 Page 14 Joint Powers Agreement 111A LA-R1CS the Authority to share the use of such frequencies and/or radio stations subject to, a separate frequency sharing agreement; (d) User Equlpment; User Equipment includes the following, mobile radios, portablo rad.los mobile data computers= radio data. moderns-, control stations; and ether related equipment. All User Equipment shall meet or exceed the minimum acceptalal'e standards establisheri by the'Autliorlty. In, the event that any User Egtrlprnent is determined ed to be affecting the prober operation of the overall System as oibotlfled by the Authority, such User EgUiphlOnt shall be iiiirnoftMely removed from. service and shall not be returned to service until any ddficiencies are resolved to th;e�,.satisfaction of the Authority. The Authority shall maintain a list of User Equipment approved for operation on the. System. Any changes to the User Equlpment list shall, be approved by the Authority. Stich approval shall not be unreasonably withheld.. (e) Dlspatch Center Equipment# Dispatch Center Equipment includes the following; dispatch consoles, Iogging recorders, system interfaces, and other ancillary equipry'aent, The Authority shall rmintain a list of r ispatch Center Equipment approved for operationi on the Systeme. Any changes to the Dispatch Center` Egq.ipmbnt list shall be approved by the Authority; Such approval shall not be unreasonablywithheld. 5.08: Adverse Impacts on System. No Member,. subscriber or affiliate shall take any action that adversely Impacts. the System If the System: is Impacted by actions of a Member, sul scriiaei° car affiliate, the offending party shall take immediate action to return the Systern to Its full operating state. The Authority, or its designed as -set forth In the bylaws,; shall rake (lie sole determination of whether iViember; subscriber or affiliate equipment a'r operations advers.* impact the, System'. Article VI WITHDRAWAL AND TERMINATION 6.01 Withdrawal: by Members. After tha periods referred to in. Section 5.01, Members niay'withdraw from the Authority by giving notice as follows: (a) Members Who do not provide infrastructure, Frequencies or Physical Plant to System shall provide to the Chairperson ninety. (90) days advanced written notice of its Intent to withdraw from the Authority; 1:,4 RIGS JPA 2009-01-05 page 16 Joint Powers Agreement Al' LA-RICS (b) Mombers who provide Infrastructure, FrequPrides or Physical Plant to 8yatem shall provide t6 the: CkOirpolrsdh twelve (12) months advanced written notice of its intent -to withdraw from the Auth&ity, 6.02 Financial I-lablililds of Withdrawing Members. Except as Otherwise provided. in 506tioh 6.01: (a) AW[thdftiW10 Member shall remain liable for all f1handal liabilities incurred: during its membership in the Authority; f however, the. Member shalt not be liable for any new financial liabilities incurred after subrnittifig writt6m notice to withdraw. (b) The ' withdrawing. Member must-cohtinud 1:6. -Pay lts,§h�ire of operating costs. duringthe ninety day or twelve month period, as app.licablei after" submitting its: Written notice of the: Intent to withdraw. (c) TheAuftrity And the withdrawing Member may negotiate a buy-out agreement for early termination of membership to retire any ongoing financial obligations the Member shares -With the Authority. (d) If a withdrawing Member holds seat on the Board, that Member's: participation on the. Board shall ihimedlaiely cease` when the.written notice to Withdraw is subin(fted. 6.03 Retention of Assets by Withdrawing Members. Each Member shall hold Its licenses and retain sole le bWhership of its licenses, including those authorizedD1 for use by the Member to the Authority,. The licenqqs and any System Componellts provided by a Member to the Authority shall remain. the sole asset of that, Mem� , jorLiilessotherwise h6goti-ated, lf'rcquested by the Aut - horlty,, the withdrawIng- Meml)er. shall 69P.sIldor options for the Authority's continued use of Member assets. Accept.aiiceof,any, option lsatthe sole dls,cretibiloftl�ewiti,iciraVviiiaMe'i�ibo-'r. In Member's System -np(?i additioh, the use by the ALI thOrity of the withdrawing Memb, sys, Goi, rents. shall- be terminated upon the effectiVe date of withdrawal (twelve months, from Initial nQtId6), and such Systdm Components shall remain the 8blo asset of the.withdrawlhg Member, unless otherwise agreed. Such wIthdra.wIh4 MbOber shall havd'ho Interest or.. cla . irn In -00y rernalnirig assets of'the Authority, the -Board, or of any of the remaining Members. 6.64 Termlhation of Authority and Disposition ofAuthority Assets. Upon termination of this Agreement and dissolution of the Authority by all Members, and aftef p the Authority, the Board.., aynlpnt of 011 obligations of (a) May sell or liquidate Authority property; and LA -RIGS JPA 2009-01-05 Page:16 Joint Powers Agreement S*11'A LA -MCS (b) Shall distribute assets, including real or personal property, in proportion to the coniribuilons made by Members. Any System Componentsprovided b "' ' Melnbdr to the.:Authority shall remain the asset: . . . y a of that Member-and'shall nQt be subject to distribution unc(pr thi$:seqtl.on. Articl&VII ; IV1I8GfflLLANEmtjs PROVISIONS 7.01 Notices. Afty.h6t!d"e''i'eqUi'eib.d'or-.permitted t6 be made h0reUndetshal]:15.6 inwriting. 00.8hall be delivered in the manner pr.E§s.c.rIb.6d heroin at the principal place of bu§1nds§W each party. The parties may give notice by: (a) Pea60A.l delivery; (b) E-maif;. (6)U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid; (d) "Certified'? U.S`, mail' postage prepaid, returnreceipt requested' - (o) Rksihiile; or (f) Any other method d I oemied'appropriate by the goard. At= any time;: by providing written notice to the other parties to this -Agreement, any party' m may change the. piece, facsimile number or e-mail for giving notice. All written notices or ddreespondende'sent 1h the described manner will be deemed given to o. party on whichever dato. occurs Oarllest:: (a) The: date of personal de'l Wry; (b The. third. business: day following deposit in the U.S. mail, when sent by "fi.rst class" mail; (c) The date on which, the party or its., agent either signed the return receipt or refused to accept delivery, asnoted on .bo t return receipt or other U.S. Postal Set'vice fdrin, When sent by '`certffled!' mail; or. (d) The. date of transmission, when sent by e-mail orfacsimllb. 111-R168�JPA 2069-61-0.5,. Page 17 ,66 Joint Powers Agreemont, '11*' 14 't,411A. LA-RICS 7.02 Amendment; Addition of Members'. (a) In addition to the original signatories to. this AgreeM.ent other publio"agencies. - may join tho-Authority as a Member, subject to the provisions -of Section:1.0. The addition Qf'any Member shall become. effective upon: (1) The execution ori behalf of such entity of a counterpart of this Agedomont ;and the delivery of such. executed counterpart to th6l Board! and (?). The adoption of a r6s6lbtion,of the Board admitting that agohcy-to the Authority. (b) This Agreement may -'only be amended by two-thirds of the Members, which mqr?t include the affirmative votes of the City of Los -Angeles: and the County of Los. Angeles, evidenced by the ex pcution of a written amendment to this Agreement; However, this Agreement -shall not be amended, modiflod or otherwise revised, phahged. or rescinded, if �siuch action would: (1) Materially and'adversely affect either the rating of bonds issued by the Authority, ty, of bondholders holding such bbhds; or (2): Limit or reduce the obligaOons of the Members to make, in the aggregate, payments which . are for the benefit of the owners of the bonds. 7.03Fiscal Year. The AuthoIr"Ity's 12 -month fiscal year shall be specified in the Authority's bylaws. 7.04 Consents an'6 Approvals. Any cohsbnts or EipprdV61s required red Under this Agreement, shall not be unreasonably. withheld, 7,05 Amendments to Act. The provisions * of the Act, as it may be amended from time to time, which are required tobe included in this Agreement, are hereby incorporated into thi's Agfeenibht by reference. 7 - .06 Enforcement of Authority, TheAuthority is. horel r �y aLlihorized, to take any or all legal or equi ablp.actipps, including . but not limited' tb injunction and specific perfoemance, necessary or permitted by law, to enforce: this Aqre'OM6fit. 7.07 gOvdrAblifty. If any one or More of the terms, provisions, promises; covenants, or conditions of - this Agreement were, to any extent, adjudged invalid., unenf(j,rc6able, void, or voidable for LA-R(O$-JPA 2000.01-0 Pap 18 64!0)) X A. LA-RICS Joint Powers. Agreement any reason whatsoever by a court of competent jurisdiction, each and all of the (bi-nalning terms; ptoAsldh8,_ promises, covenantsi, and conditions of this Agreement: shall not.bq affected thereby and shall be.valld and 6nf6tdeab[e to the fullest -extent permitted by Im 7.08 Successors; This: Agreement shall be.bindihq upon and shall inure to the benefit of the successors -of each M'ember. 7.09 Assignment, No Member shall assign any rights or. -obligations under this Agreement without the prior 9 written consent of the Board, 7.10 Governing Law. This Agreement is -road6. and to b -e performed in the-Countyof Los Angeles, State of California, and as such California substantive And . Ptdft ceral law shall apply. 7.11 Headings. The section heading$ ljerelpAWfbr- convenience only and are not W be construed. as modifying or governing the! langqage of this, Agreement 7.1.2 Cdunterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts. 7.13 NO Third Party Beneficleirles. This Agreement and the obllgqtions hereunder are not intended to benefit any party other than the Authority and its M61TII)prs, except as exprpssJy provided otherwise, Herein. No entity that is not a'slgiult6ry to this Agreement shali havo, any riglifs or oati f '6 .�ep� o actloh against any party t6 this Agreement as result Of that party performance or non-performance under this Agreement, except as exp(essly provided otherwise herein. 7.14 Filing of Notice of Agreement.. Within 30 days after the Effective Date, or amendment thereto, the Secre.tary shall cause to be Med with the Secretary of State the notice of Agreement: required by the.- Aot. 7.16 Conflict of Interest Code. The Board shall adopt a c6nfllbt of interest code as required by law. 7.16 indemnification. fidernnificatlon. The AUJI-iority shall defend, indemnify and hold h'Wml6ss- each Member (;Efhd each Member's. officers, agents, and employees},from any and all liability, including but not limited to cla'ims, losses, suits, injuries, damages-, costs and. expenses (including LA -RIPS JPA 200901-05 P6de 19 41 . sl LA;.RICS Joint Powera Agreement. attorney's fees); arising from or as a result of any acts, errors or omissions of the Authority,or its officers-, agerits or employees, 7.17 Dispute Resolution/Legal Proceedings. Disputes regarding the interpretation- or application of any provision of this Agreement small, to the extent reasonably feasible, be resolved thro�Jgh good faith -negotiations betweeh,the Members and/or the AUthority, IN; WITNESS WHEREOF, each Member has caused this Agreement to, be executed and attested by its proper officers thereunto duly.aufhorized, its official seals to be hereto affixed, as follows: LA -RIGS JPA 2009 -di -06' Page 20 i LA-RICS Joint PoWors Agreement City of Authorization For Membership in the, Los Angeles Regional Interoperability Communications System- Authority (LA -RIGS) IN WITNESS�-WHEREOF, the City of „.by order of ifs City Council, has caused this' Joint. Powers Agreement to be executed on its behalf by the Mayor; and attestedby the City Clark, as: of the date so attested below, MAYOR; DATE ATTEST:. CITY CLERK DATE LA -RIGS JPA. 2009- 1-05 PATRICK J. MALLON EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR June 2, 2014 LOS ANGELES REGIONAL INTEROPERABLE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM AUTHORITY Dear LA-RICS Members: 2525 Corporate Place, Suite 200 Monterey Park, California 91754 (323) 881-8291 VIA EMAIL & U.S. MAIL Please be advised that the Board of Directors for the Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communications System (LA-RICS) Authority ("Authority") adopted on May 28, 2014, the enclosed Funding Plan for the Authority. The Authority was established in 2009 to engage in a region -wide cooperative effort to plan and establish a wide -area interoperable public safety communications network known as LA-RICS. LA-RICS is comprised of two independent systems, which include a voice (land mobile radio, or LMR) system, and a broadband data (long-term evolution, or LTE) system. With the adoption of the Funding Plan, we are another step closer to making interoperable communications for the region, a reality. The enclosed Funding Plan details how costs for administration, operations and maintenance, capital replacement, and hard match for LMR and LTE are calculated based on the population and geographic area of the Member agency. These two variables are weighted equally at 50% each. Please feel free to share the Funding Plan with your City Attorney, Police Chief and/or Fire Chief. We are also sending you a copy of the Funding Plan via USPS on a CD. In summary, the Funding Plan allocates costs to Members as follows: Authority's Administration Costs: Distribution of 40% of Authority staff and operating costs based on Members' proportional share of countywide population and geography equally split 50%/50% (effective FY 2014/2015). LMR System Operating Costs: No costs will be allocated or collected for the LMR System from Members until such time as the system is operational (projected FY 2017/18), unless the Authority Board adopts a revised Funding Plan, to account for any loss or shortage of grant funds. LTE System Operating Costs: o The cost of operation during the first year of operation (FY 2015/16) is based on: • Distribution of 30% of Authority staffing and LTE System operational costs and fiber connectivity operational costs, if applicable, based on Authority Members' proportional share of countywide population and geography equally split 50%/50%. • Hard match contribution based on Authority Members' proportional share of countywide population and geography equally split 50%/50%, LA-RICS Members June 2, 2014 Page 2 o The cost of operation during the second and subsequent years of operation (effective FY 2016/17) is based on: • Distribution of 30% of Authority staffing and LTE System operational costs and full cost of LTE System maintenance (including leased fiber connectivity, if applicable) based on Authority Members' proportional share of countywide population and geography equally split 50%/50%. • Hard match contribution based on Authority Members' proportional share of countywide population and geography equally split 50%/50%. • Cost of operation during years following the extinguishment of commercial financing will continue as reflected above, with the exception of hard match contributions. We encourage you to review the Funding Plan in detail, and contact us should you have any questions. The Funding Plan does set forth your jurisdictions current share of costs as a Member of the Authority. Please note that Year 1 Administrative cost, which commence upon adoption of the Funding Plan, as well as the LTE Hard Match costs, will be incorporated into the LA-RICS 2015-2016 Operating Budget and will be brought before the JPA Board for final approval. As further information, should your City desire to withdraw from the Authority after evaluating the Funding Plan, the Board has set a 180 -day time period for Members to submit written notices of withdrawal. Pursuant to Article V, Section 5.01 (Adoption of Funding Plan) of the Joint Powers Agreement ("JPA Agreement"), there will be no costs for any Member that withdraws from the Authority during this time period. Your last day to withdraw as a Member under Section 5.01 of the JPA Agreement expires on November 24, 2014. Notices of withdrawal must be done in writing, and can be given by personal delivery, e-mail, U.S. Mail, certified U.S. Mail, or facsimile. My Executive Assistant, Wendy Stallworth-Tait, will be the staff person to receive your official notices of withdrawal. She can be reached via e-mail at Wgngy,,-,tallworth-tait@La-_rics.org or by telephone at (323) 881-8311.. It is our hope that you will continue as a full Member in the Authority and participate in both the LMR and LTE systems for the benefit of your jurisdiction, the Authority, and the region. As you know, interoperable communications represents the greatest regional need in the area of emergency preparedness and homeland security. Thank you for your continued support and leadership on the effort to improve communications for first responders in the greater Los Angeles region. Sincerely, PATRICK J, ALLON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Attachments PJM:wst ITEM NO. STAFF REPORT LM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Q, iUilf0F 6 � FROM: Marc Castagnola, AICP, Communt Direr t� L - Amy L. Harbin, AICP, City Plan� � sArr,o_13Rir� , L,LEY DATE: November 18, 2015 "° SUBJECT: A REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND A SPECIFIC PLAN INCLUDING AN URBAN DESIGN FRAMEWORK, CIRCULATION AND PARKING, ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, AND DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES WITHIN THE AREA GENERALLY DEFINED AS THE CITY'S DOWNTOWN AREA. (LOCATION: THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT AREA, GENERALLY BOUNDED BY LA RICA AVENUE TO THE WEST, CLARK STREET TO THE NORTH, PARK N RIDE LOT TO THE EAST AND DOWNING AVENUE TO THE SOUTH, INCLDUING THE METROLINK RAIL STATION; APPLICANT: CITY OF BALDWIN PARK; CASE NUMBER: SP 15-01). SUMMARY This report requests City Council consideration of an Environmental Impact Report and a specific plan including an urban design framework, circulation, parking, zoning and development standards and guidelines within the area generally defined as the City's Downtown area pursuant to Subchapter 153.210.660 through 153.210.710 of the City's Municipal Code. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this item. However, approval of the Specific Plan may spur economic development within the area leading to increased economic activity and general fund revenues to the City. RECOMMENDATION Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that following the public hearing the City Council: #1) Adopt and approve Resolution 2015-099 entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED DOWNTOWN TRANSIT ORIENTED SPECIFIC PLAN AS ADEQUATE AND COMPLETE AND ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF FINDINGS OF FACT IN SUPPORT THEREOF, A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS AND MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (LOCATION: THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT AREA GENERALLY BOUNDED BY LA RICA AVENUE TO THE WEST, CLARK STREET TO THE NORTH, PARK N RIDE LOT TO THE EAST AND DOWNING AVENUE TO THE SOUTH, INCLUDING THE METROLINK RAIL STATION. APPLICANT: CITY OF BALDWIN PARK; CASE NUMBER: SPECIFIC PLAN 15-01 (SP 15-01);" and #2) Adopt and approve Resolution 2015-098 entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ADOPTING THE FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING A TRANSIT -ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT SPECIFIC PLAN FOR THE DOWNTOWN BALDWIN PARK AREA (LOCATION: THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT AREA GENERALLY BOUNDED BY LA RICA AVENUE TO SP 15-01 (Downtown Transit Oriented Development Specific Plan) November 18, 2015 Page 2 THE WEST, CLARK STREET TO THE NORTH, PARK N RIDE LOT TO THE EAST AND DOWNING AVENUE TO THE SOUTH, INCLUDING THE METROLINK RAIL STATION. APPLICANT: CITY OF BALDWIN PARK; CASE NUMBER: SPECIFIC PLAN 15-01 (SP 15-01). BACKGROUND The purpose of developing a Specific Plan for Downtown Baldwin Park is to bring revitalizing activities to the Downtown and improve access to all modes of transportation including, transit, walking, and bicycling. The Specific Plan is anticipated to facilitate development especially residential development in the Downtown area proximate to the Metrolink Station. The primary objectives of the project are to identify land use options that include increased housing densities, and mixed uses, as well as create pedestrian linkages between the station, community facilities and major recreation, retail and residential nodes of activity. The Downtown Specific Plan will help facilitate the return of Downtown Baldwin Park to being an area that is vibrant, walkable and the heart of the City. This Specific Plan will provide opportunities to building on the City's unique historical and cultural characteristics to enhance the Downtown core; take advantage of access to regional transit, including Metrolink and numerous Foothill Transit and Metro bus routes that serve downtown; create a strong community identity and sense of place; provide new employment, housing and shopping opportunities; and strengthen the City's tax base. Several opportunity sites within walking distance of the Metrolink Station and Transit Center parking structure allow significant potential for infill development and adaptive reuse of existing under-utilized structures to better serve the transit -oriented Downtown area and generate new investment. The Specific Plan will guide future development of mixed uses in a walkable environment, streamline the development processed, and serve as an incentive for economic development. t t��,�lIC1I"CC,"1 In accordance with the provisions of the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA), it has been determined that the proposed project will have a significant effect on the environment and an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been prepared. The Initial Study and subsequent Environmental Impact Report have been prepared by Environmental Science Associates (ESA) for the Planning Division. Beginning December 31, 2014 and ending on February 5, 2015, the Notice of Preparation (NOP) and Initial Study were circulated. The NOP requested that interested parties review the issues addressed by the EIR and to identify any relevant environmental issues that should be addressed. Seven (7) comment letters were received by the City in response to the NOP, including Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (METRO), Metrolink, City of Azusa, Suburban Water Systems, and Los Angeles County Sanitation District. During the 30 -day NOP comment period, the City held a public scoping meeting on January 14, 2015. Additional comments received at the public scoping meeting related to adequate water needs, traffic, and parking. The Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) was prepared and included discussion of those environmental issues obtained as part of the NOP and the public scoping meeting. After the DEIR was prepared, the DEIR was circulated for a 45 -day period and was also available for public review on the City's website, City Hall, and the Baldwin Park Library between May 4, 2015 and June 22, 2015 (Attachment #4). Upon completion of the 45 -day review period, responses to all comments on the environmental issues discussed in the DEIR were prepared and incorporated into a Final EIR. The Final EIR was forwarded to all individuals/entities a minimum of ten (10) days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing. CAAmy\AMY\WORD\Reports\Council Reports\SP 15-01 DTown Specific Plan.doc SP 15-01 (Downtown Transit Oriented Development Specific Plan) November 18, 2015 Pal?e 3 A Notice of Public Hearing by the Planning Commission on the proposed Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report was posted at City Hall, Baldwin Park Community Center, and Barnes Park on November 4, 2015. Additionally, the public hearing notice was available at the City Hall public counters beginning November 5, 2015. DOi�Vr"w'TQ WN SP (1711C PIAN ARP The Downtown Specific Plan area . .. ea is approximately 115 acres in size and is generally defined as the City's Central Business District, anchored by the Ramona Boulevard/Maine Avenue intersection, which is a focal point. The boundary for the Downtown TOD Specific Plan focuses on the commercial area within one-quarter to one-half mile of the Metrolink Station and includes several key sites that would benefit from transit -oriented development. The overall Specific Plan area is essentially flat. There are several existing surface parking areas and nearly one-half of the existing land uses in Downtown are retail uses. The Downtown area includes a high concentration of core Government, transportation and recreation services, including City Hall, Police Station, Post Office, Valley County Water District, Morgan Park, Esther Snyder Community Center and the Baldwin Park Metrolink Station for the San Bernardino Line. DISCUSSION The Specific Plan (Exhibit "A"), is authorized under California Government Code is the regulatory mechanism that enables the construction of proposed Projects within the defined area, provided they are consistent with the adopted Specific Plan. The Specific Plan is divided into eight (8) different chapters, each addressing a separate topic, including, overall Design Concept, Zoning and Development Standards, Design Standards and Guidelines, Circulation and Parking. There are also Chapters in the Specific Plan which discuss infrastructure (Water System, Sewer System, Storm Drain System, etc.) and implementation. This chapter addresses the overall design framework for the long-term development potential of Downtown Baldwin Park, including both public and private improvements. The primary goal of the Urban Design Framework is to develop the Specific Plan area as a system of places, structures and environment integrated into its surroundings rather than linear strips of unrelated building and undefined streetscapes. A clear framework with a strong sense of place provides visitors and residents with an understanding of how to easily and safely find their way around and to efficiently identify uses and activities. Arrangement of land uses into identifiable nodes, improved streetscapes, connected open spaces, improved linkages to transit, and enhanced landmarks and features will help make the Specific Plan area an accessible distinctive downtown. Combined these factors help establish a cohesive and positive identity or Downtown Baldwin Park. The overarching strategy is to transform Downtown into a vital and vibrant destination that serves local residents, employees and visitors. This strategy calls for the intensification of land uses and the prioritization of public improvements to create a distinctive and enriching environment. A crucial component of this transformation is to reconceptualize Ramona Boulevard as a street that serves multiple functions and promotes walkability, rather than acting solely as a major thoroughfare for automobiles. ;,'oniqg ment Standards In 2012 the City adopted a comprehensive update to the City's Zoning Code. A major focus of this update was to incorporate Mixed Use zoning at appropriate locations to support the Mixed Use Land Use designations C:WmyWMY\WORD\Repons\Council Repons\SP 15-01 DTown Specific Plan. doe SP 15-01 (Downtown Transit Oriented Development Specific Plan) November 18, 2015 Page 4 identified in the 2020 General Plan. As such approximately one-third of the Downtown area is zoned Mixed Use -1 and this mixed use zoning is maintained in the Specific Plan. The MU -1 Zone is intended to create opportunities for development that integrate commercial and residential uses. This zoning will be conducive to creating projects that support transit and walkability. There are several different zoning designations within the defined downtown area, including, Open Space (OS), Garden Multi -Family Residential (R -G), Industrial Commercial (I -C), General Commercial (C-2), Neighborhood C°omineivial (C-1), aiid Mixed. Use 1 (MIJ-1). The use and developnietil, regulations for the C-1, C-2, I -C, l -G, and OS zones are sLil ject to the provisions contained in the Zoning Code witlEi added provisions and exceptions which are tailored directly to transit -oriented development. Use regulations and development standards for the MU -1 zone are contained within the Specific Plan. Although generally the same as the Zoning Code, the intent and purpose of the MU -1 zone is to provide development opportunities of integrated, complementary residential, and commercial development on the same parcel or contiguous parcels. The MU -1 zone was established to create opportunities for development that integrates commercial and residential uses within the Downtown, with an emphasis on retail, service, entertainment and restaurant business oriented toward street frontages and residential and professional office uses to complement such uses. The MU -1 zone is intended to promote development and uses which are functionally integrated by location and types of structures, the efficient use of land, optimal site planning and various public and private design elements. When planning for use projects in Downtown, it will be important to preserve flexibility for land owners so they can respond to evolving market conditions. This is a significant benefit of having mixed use zoning in a large portion of Downtown, which offers greater flexibility than single -use zoning. In addition, new development project will be asked to consider including flex spaces that can work as retail, office or even live/work space where feasible. This flexibility will allow land owners to maximize the value of their project and encourage on- going economic development. Design j Lindards and Guidelines The Design Standards and Guidelines Chapter provides standards and guidelines for mixed use developments in the Mixed Use 1 (MU -1) zone as well as exterior alterations and additions to existing mixed use developments. The purpose of these standards and guidelines is to facilitate high-quality development within the Downtown. Mixed use development integrates complementary residential and commercial development on the same parcel or contiguous group of parcel. Development can be integrated either horizontally or vertically on the site. It provides opportunities to weave residential and public uses into the commercial fabric to create an active street life and enhance the vitality of businesses. The design standards and guidelines are intended to provide property owners and their designers with basic design criteria that are intended to reinforce the desired building and Downtown character to accomplish the following goals: a) Facilitate the development of well-designed buildings, or group of buildings that integrate residences, neighborhood -serving businesses and public uses b) Promote design creativity and variation while ensuring consistency in building, scale proportion and pedestrian orientation. c) Contribute to the neighborhood by respecting scale, proportion and architectural style of the surrounding area d) Create visual interest in mixed use buildings, while maintaining a sense of harmony within the project e) Eliminate random development patterns and establish site planning and design relationships between new development and neighboring properties f) Encourage environmental sensitivity in development CAAmy\AMY\WORD\Reports\Council Reports\SP 15-01 DTown Specific Plan.doc SP 15-01 (Downtown Transit Oriented Development Specific Plan) November 18, 2015 Page 5 g) Preserve and incorporate structures in to the project that are distinctive because of their age, cultural significance, or unique architectural style. The standards and guidelines contained within this chapter apply to all mixed-use developments and are in addition to the development standards set forth in Chapter 4 of the Specific Plan and other applicable regulations in the Baldwin Park Zoning Code. Design guidelines for the other zoning designations within the Specific plan area, multi -family residential, commercial or industrial are contained within the citywide Design Guidelines Manual. ( "irc°.i.da "ion crnd]!Li kin, This chapter defines the Specific Plan provisions for circulation and parking within the Downtown TOD Specific Plan area. The Plan takes advantage of the central location of the Metrolink Station and emphasizes a multimodal approach to circulation to afford convenient access to and circulation within the area for all transportation modes. Consistent with the City's Policies for Complete Streets, the Plan is intended to provide not only effective auto circulation, but also choices and opportunities for effective and convenient transit, pedestrian and bicycle circulation. Residents, employees and visitors should be also able to conveniently park, and to also walk around the area in an attractive, safe and comfortable environment. The Specific Plan therefore provides for a balance between all transportation modes in the Downtown. Q rc17�tr U(1tne This Chapter summarizes the existing and planned infrastructure facilities and provides recommended infrastructure upgrades for the Baldwin Park Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Specific Plan area. The recommended upgrades are based upon comparing the existing facilities and their capabilities/capacities with the proposed development within the Specific plan area. An analysis was conducted for the existing infrastructure facilities in the Specific Plan area and was presented in the Baseline Infrastructure Study, prepared in May, 2014. That study addressed the water system, sewer system, storm Drain System, Electrical System, Natural Gas System, Telecommunications System and Cable Television System. The proposed development within the Specific Plan area is assumed to be at maximum build -out condition based on the Specific Plan zoning. The recommendation provided in this chapter will serve as a guideline for future improvements to the infrastructure within the Specific Plan Area. The Planning Design &Community Process The Downtown Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Specific Plan was prepared through a participatory process that engaged the community and informed and involved the decision makers throughout the process. In keeping with the goals of the METRO TOD Planning Grant Program, the Specific Plan process also educated the community about the benefits of TOD. The Specific Plan was generated by the expectation that enhancing the Metrolink Station and its relationship to the Downtown will not only help met local and regional transportation goals, but also will work toward fulfilling the City's vision for a revitalized Downtown. Consistent with our workscope and the METRO TOD Planning grant Program, the City held three (3) public workshops at various intervals of the project. The first meeting was held in May 2014 and discussed the baseline analysis, opportunities within the specific plan area, and constraints within the Specific Plan area. The second meeting held three months later in August 2014 involved the consulting team identifying the preliminary land use plan for the area and the urban design concepts. The final meeting was held in January 2015 and at that time the consultant team presented the draft specific plan which was circulating for public review. As such, the process actively incorporated a discussion of TOD principals through all phases of the Specific Plan Development. CAAmy\AMY\WORD\Reports\Council Reports\SP 15-01 DTown Specific Plan doc SP 15-01 (Downtown Transit Oriented Development Specific Plan) November 18, 2015 Page 6 FINDINGS OF FACT—SPECIFIC PLAN 1) The specific plan is consistent with and provides for the orderly, systematic and specific implementation of the General Plan. The specific plan will provide for the orderly, systematic and specific implementation of the General Plan within the Specific Plan area (approximately 115 acres overall). The Specific Plan identifies sites that are underutilized and have the potential for redevelopment, infill development and/or adaptive reuse to better serve the downtown area. The proposed Specific Plan includes development standards to facilitate a cohesive design and a high-quality architectural and pedestrian -oriented environment through a continuous street -frontage, pedestrian connections and ground -floor design features that provide a visual link to the street and sidewalk. Build -out of the Specific Plan would result in the development of 833 residential units and 289,135 s.f. of non-residential space. The specific plan is located within the Downtown Area noted in Goal 8.0 of the Land Use Element of the General Plan which seeks to establish a pedestrian "core" for the Downtown Area. Additionally, Policy 8.1 encourages the City to provide a mix of commercial and multi -family residential uses to create 24-hour activity in the Downtown, which is exactly what the Specific Plan facilitates to create within the area. 2) The land use and development regulations within the specific plan are comparable in breadth and depth to regulations contained in this chapter. The proposed development standards contained in the specific plan do vary some from the development standards contained in the City's Municipal Code; however there is a reduction in the number of parking stalls required for commercial uses (75% of the current Zoning Code requirement) and residential multi -family uses. This reduction is to reflect the characteristics of a Downtown transit oriented development and to reflect on the `Park Once" concept. Furthermore, the reduction in the development standards for on-site parking is justified in that the project proposal is transit -oriented given its close proximity and walking distance to the Baldwin Park Metrolink Rail Station, the MTA rapid bus route along Ramona Boulevard, which feeds into the El Monte Bus Station, as well as Foothill Transit bus routes which serve the San Gabriel Valley. Transit -oriented development typically requires fewer parking than regular development due to its location near transit hubs and proximity to goods and services. This reduces the likelihood that residents to have two automobiles per unit and instead residents will rely on public transit and other alternative modes of transportation. 3) The specific plan will not adversely affect the public health and safety or result in incompatible land uses. This specific plan is consistent with Goal 8.0 of the Land Use Element of the General plan which seeks to establish a pedestrian `Core' for the Downtown as noted with the transit -oriented, mixed use development including up to a maximum 833 residential dwelling units and the 289,135 s.f. of commercial/retail space. The specific plan is also consistent with Policy 8.1 which is to provide for a mix of commercial and multi -family residential uses ... and allows mixed use development to consist of vertical integration of commercial and residential uses as shown in the attached Specific Plan. 4) The specific plan provides the framework to phase and pace growth within the specific plan area so as to ensure completion of all necessary public facilities concurrently with completion of development entailed in the specific plan. The specific plan is not specifically phased; however, it is considered a long-range document. Much of the revitalization in the Specific Plan area will require land assemblage and on sites CAAmy\AMY\WORD\Reports\Council Reports\SP 15-01 DTown Specific Plan,doc SP 15-01 (Downtown Transit Oriented Development Specific Plan) November 18, 2015 Page 7 with multiple owners, redevelopment tends to be longer term (10+ years). It is anticipated that the any proposed development within the Specific Plan area will be coordinated in accordance with the Specific Plan's development standards and design guidelines. 5) The specific plan identifies adequate financing mechanisms for the infrastructure and public facilities required to support the development. There are no financing mechanisms noted in the specific plan and financing of the infrastructure of any type of new development within the Specific Plan area will be completely borne by the respective Developer. Any developer who decides to undertake any development within the Specific Plan area will be required to coordinate with each respective utility company with regards to upgrading/installing infrastructure. However, the Specific Plan notes that the City should develop an infrastructure financing plan as outlined in Chapter 8. Because individual areas of the Specific Plan may develop at different times, and it is anticipated that the infrastructure and available funding sources will change as development occurs, the financing plan will need to be updated periodically. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION The Planning Commission at a Special Meeting on Tuesday, October 27, 2015 voted 5-0 recommending that the City Council approve and adopt the Final Environmental Impact report as presented and adopt the Findings of Fact approving the Downtown Transit -Oriented Specific Plan for the City's Downtown Area. LEGAL REVIEW This report has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney as to legal form and content. ALTERNATIVES Should the City Council elect to not approve the Final Environmental Impact Report and Downtown Transit - Oriented Specific Plan, the City would not have an incentive (completed CEQA) to attract developers and struggle in its ability to attract new development, revitalizing the downtown area. ATTACUMENYS #1, Exhibit "A", Specific Plan SP 15-01, dated October 27, 2015 #2, Vicinity Map #3, Draft Environmental Impact Report (Available for review in the office of the City Clerk) #4, Final Environmental Impact Report #5, Findings of Fact #6, Statement of Overriding Considerations #7, Mitigation Monitoring Program (Also included with the Final Environmental Impact Report) #8, Resolution 2015-099—Environmental Impact Report #9, Resolution 2015-098—Specific Plan C:Wmy\AMY\WORD\Reports\Council Reports\SP 15-01 DTown Specific Plan.doc ATTACHMENT #1 EXHIBIT"A' SPECIFIC PLAN SP 15-019 DATED OCTOBER 279 2015 City of Baldwin Park December 2014 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT ........................ t � �" ,_ " City +iBaldwin Park City Council Maau*tLoma, Mayor Monica Garcia,» CounclimernkV Susan Rubio, 2+« «}m«mi«r Planning Commission +:di Must, Chair Ken Woods, Vice Choir Ma§»d=6«. Jr.,C+mm%£!« 22%x9 Paidilla,w Commissioner Lead S<< Staff Shannon Youcklea, Chief ExeC < «. Officer 9:1x%9 C >m<r«v:« Amy HarWn, City Planner DnW&M >»Pubk Works Director Consultants tot |t The Arroyo Group j*.% (� �}, \ Science�(»� \\� Associates\ \��» joka M. CrvIlkshsak Engineers (I -MCI) Contents Chapter 1: Introduction A. What is a Specific Plan? ........................................................................................................ 1 B. Background.......................................................................................................................... 1 C. Purpose................................................................................................................................ 2 D. Downtown Specific Plan Area.............................................................................................. 2 E. Recent Planning Efforts . ............. —. .......... ........................... ............... „.....,. 3 F. Recent Development Activity ................. .. .. ..., , 6 G. Specific Plan Goals ....... . ........ ......... .,...... ....... ..,...... ....., ....,..,, 7 H. Metro TOD Planning Grant Program.................................................................................... 7 1. Administration.......................................................................................................................7 4. Lighting......................................................................................................................... 1. General Plan Consistency............................................................................................... 7 2. Applicability and Conformity of Development............................................................... 8 3. Approval Process............................................................................................................ 8 4. Maintenance and Update of the Specific Plan................................................................ 9 5. Application of the CEQA Process.................................................................................... 9 J. Organization of Specific Pian ......... ... ........................ ... ............. .................. ........ 10 Chapter 2: Planning and Design Process A. Introduction....................................................................................................................... 13 B. Issues and Opportunities....................................................................................................13. C. Community Workshops......................................................................................................17 D. Specific Plan Principles....................................................................................................... 18 Chapter 3: Design Concept A. introduction....................................................................................................................... 21 B. Urban Design Framework................................................................................................... 21 C. Land Use Vision.................................................................................................................. 24 E. Ramona Boulevard............................................................................................................. 28 F. Streetscape Improvements .................... ........ .......... ......... ,.. ........ 31 1. Street Trees ........ .......— ....... ......... ......... ......... ......... 31 2. Pedestrian Amenities.................................................................................................... 34 3. Street Furniture............................................................................................................ 34 4. Lighting......................................................................................................................... 34 S. Wayfinding................................................................................................................... 34 6. Public Art...................................................................................................................... 36 Chapter 4: Zoning and Development Standards A. Introduction....................................................................................................................... 37 B. Specific Plan Zoning ...................................................... ........ ........, 37 C. Mixed Use 1 (MU -1) Zone ........... ......... ...... ,.,.,,... ..... ......,.. 39 1. intent and Purpose...............................................................................................»..,. 39 2. Use Regulations............................................................................................................ 41 3. Development Provisions............................................................................................... 44 Table of Contents 4. Required Residential Open Space................................................................................. 50 5. Standards for Live/Work Units..................................................................................... 51 6. Standards for Outdoor Dining...................................................................................... 52 7. Additional Development Standards for Mixed Use Developments .............................. 56 8. Outdoor Storage and Uses............................................................................................ 57 9. Other Applicable Zoning Regulations............................................................................ 57 D. Neighborhood Commercial (C-1) Zone............................................................................... 58 1. Development Provisions............................................................................................... 58 E. General Commercial (C-2) Zone.......................................................................................... 58 1. Development Provisions............................................................................................... 59 F. Industrial Commercial (I -C) Zone......................................................................................... 60 1. Development provisions............................................................................................... 60 G. Garden Multi-Famlly Residential (R -G) Zone......... ,. _... .... .................. .. .......•.,.. _ 60 1. Development Provisions............................................................................................... 61 H. Open Space (OS) Zone........................................................................................................ 61 1. Development Provisions............................................................................................... 61 Chapter 5: Design Standards and Guidelines A. Introduction....................................................................................................................... 63 B. Site Design Standards and Guidelines............................................................................... 65 1. Building Siting, Orientation and Setbacks..................................................................... 65 2. Vehicle Circulation and Access.................................................................................... 67 3. Parking Lots.................................................................................................................. 67 4. Parking Structures......................................................................................................... 68 5. Interface between Residential and Non -Residential Uses ,....., ..,...... ...,...70 6. Plazas and Courtyards.................................................................................................. 70 7. Residential Open Space................................................................................................ 71 8. Pedestrian Walkways.................................................................................................... 72 9. Site Amenities.............................................................................................................. 73 10. Fences, Walls and Hedges........................................................................................... 74 11. Exterior Lighting......................................................................................................... 75 12. Loading Areas............................................................................................................. 75 13. Outdoor Storage and Service Areas............................................................................ 76 14. Refuse and Recyclables Collection Facilities............................................................... 76 15. Utility and Mechanical Equipment............................................................................. 76 C. Architectural Design Standards and Guidelines................................................................. 77 1. Building Organization.................................................................................................... 77 2. Architectural Style........................................................................................................ 77 3. Scale, Mass and Form................................................................................................... 78 4. Building Modulation and Articulation........................................................................... 78 5. Building Facade and Elevation Design.......................................................................... 80 6. Building Entrances........................................................................................................ 82 7. Building Elements........................................................................................................ 83 8. Privacy for Residential Units........................................................................................ 87 9. Roof Design.................................................................................................................. 88 10. Doors and Windows.................................................................................................... 88 11. Architectural Lighting................................................................................................ 89 12. Materials and Finishes................................................................................................ 90 13. Color and Texture....................................................................................................... 90 14. Corporate Identity Issues............................................................................................ 90 Table of Contents D. Landscape Design Standards and Guidelines .................... ........... ....... .... __............ ...,,,,.,, 90 E. Sustainable Design Standards and Guidelines............... .................. ...... ................ ............ _ 90 1. Site Design and Passive Solar Design............................................................................ 90 2, Building Design............................................................................................................. 92 3. Water Efficiency............................................................................................................ 92 Chapter 6: Circulation and Parking A. Introduction....................................................................................................................... 93 B. Complete Streets................................................................................................................ 93 1. Complete Streets in the City of Baldwin Park„..„ ....... ».,,,».,„........ ,,........ ___ ... ........ ».... 93 2. Complete Streets in the Specific Plan Area................................................................... 94 C. The Circulation Network..................................................................................................... 96 1. General Plan Street Designations................................................................................. 96 2. Specific Plan Street Functions and Complete Streets ................................................... 98 D. Automobile Circulation.... ......... . ........ . ........ ........,....... ,.... ,,.,... ,,105 125 1. Street Improvements and Changes............................................................................105 E. Transit Circulation.............................................................................................................106 127 1. Transit Service.............................................................................................................106 2. Metrolink Station Access............................................................................................107 3. Bus Stops and Amenities............................................................................................ 107 4. Provision for The Mid -Valley Transportation Corridor................................................107 F. Pedestrian Circulation.......................................................................................................110 1. Pedestrian Network.................................................................................... ...............110 2. Street Crossings and Other Pedestrian Improvements...............................................113 3. Access to the Metrolink Station..................................................................................113 4. Wayfinding and Directional Signage...........................................................................113 G. Bicycle Circulation............................................................................................................ 113 1. Blcycle Lanes and Bicycle Routes................................................................................114 2. The Bicycle Network...................................................................................................114 3. Bicyde Parking...........................................................................................................116 H. Parking............................................................................................................................. 116 1. General Parking Characteristics in Downtowns ..........................................................116 2. Parking In Downtown Baldwin Park............................................................................117 3. Downtown TOD Specific Plan Parking Strategy ...........................................................117 4. Parking Requirements in the Specific Plan Area ......... ........ „ 118 Chapter 7: Infrastructure A. Introduction ...... ......... .......... ......... ......,*. 121 B. Water System...... ....... _ ................... . ......... ........ ......... .... 121 C. Sewer System..... ......... ....».,.. ,., .,,.»............,.,....,.,, ...,..... ,»... » ...»,.»..,»»..,». 123 D. Storm Drain System.......................................................................................................... 124 E. Electrical System............................................................................................................... 125 F. Natural Gas System........................................................................................................... 125 G. Telecommunications System ...... ___ ....... ......... ....,... .»......,........,.127 H. Cable Television System ....... ........ -..... ,........... .....- ...,.,»„ ................... 127 Table of Contents iii Chapter 8: Implementation A. Introduction..................................................................................................................... 129 B. Implementation Strategy.................................................................................................. 129 1. Infrastructure Financing . ......... ...w...... ........ .„ ..............130 2. Implementation Strategy Steps.........................................................................................131 Figures Figure1: Specific Plan Area....................................................................................................... 4 Figure3-1: Urban Design Framework ..., .... ...... ........ ......... ......... 22 Figure4-1: Specific Plan Zoning.............................................................................................. 38 Figure 4-2: Front Yard Requirement for Parcels Fronting the North Side of Ramona Boulevard between Maine Avenue and Bogart Avenue ....................................... 47 Figure 4-3: Building Height Adjacent to Single Family Residential Zone .................................. 48 Figure 4-4: Typical Layout of Outdoor Dining Spaces.............................................................. 54 Figure6-1: Circulation System................................................................................................. 97 Figure 6-2: Ramona Boulevard - Cesar Chavez Drive to Maine Ave. - Existing Condition .....100 Figure 6-3: Ramona Boulevard - Cesar Chavez Drive to Maine Ave. - Proposed ...................101 Figure 6-4: Maine Avenue Existing and Proposed Cross-Sections.........................................103 Figure 6-5: Regional Transit................................................................................................... 108 Figure 6-6: Local Baldwin Park Transit................................................................................... 109 Figure 6-7: Pedestrian Circulation......................................................................................... 111 Figure 6-8: Bicycle Circulation............................................................................................... 115 Figure 7-1: Existing and Proposed Wet Utilities....................................................................122 Figure7-2: Existing Dry Utilities.............................................................................................126 Tables Table 3-1: Recommended Street Tree Types for Major Streets in the Specific Plan Area ....... 33 Table 4-1: Permitted and Conditionally Permitted Uses within Mixed Use 1(MU-1) Zone..... 42 Table 4-2: Development Standards for Mixed Use 1(MU-1) Zone .......................................... 44 Table 4-3: Residential Density Bonus for Community Benefits ............................................... 45 Table 8-1: Economic Implementation Plan for the Downtown TOD Specific Plan.................132 iv Table of Contents Introduction A. What is a Specific Plan? The Downtown Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Specific Plan Is a City -initiated Specific Plan to demonstrate a clear vision for new development, and is an economic development tool to facilitate development. The Specific Plan includes an associated Program Environment Impact Report (EIR), which creates certainty for future development by providing environmental clearance for specified levels of development Intensity, and saves future development applicants future time and money by streamlining their CEOA review. A Specific Plan Is a regulatory tool that local governments use to Implement their General Plan and to guide development in a localized area. While the General Plan is the overall guide for growth and development in a community, the goal of a Specific Plan is to focus on the unique characteristics of a special area by customizing the planning process and land use regulations to that area. The authority for preparation and adoption of specific pians is set forth in the California Government Code, Sections 65450 through 65457. The California Government Code authorizes Jurisdictions to adopt specific plans by ordinance as regulatory documents. The law allows adoption of Specific Plans as may be required for the implementation of the General Plan. B. Background In the first half of the 1900's, Downtown Baldwin Park was developing as a pedestrian and transit oriented "traditional" downtown, with a mixture of retail, residential and civic uses In a walkable environment. At that time, the old Pacific Electric Red Car rail line occupied the middle of the Ramona Boulevard right-of-way, connecting Baldwin Park to downtown Los Angeles and providing transit connection to the greater los Angeles area. In the early 1950's, however, the Red Car rail system was dismantled. Since then, Incompatible strip commercial development has replaced older buildings In the Downtown. Though still called the "Downtown," the traditional downtown district fabric has been dissolving around its edges In favor of automobile oriented strip commercial development. Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 1 Introduction In the early 1990's, rail transit was reintroduced to Baldwin Park with the Metrolink San Bernardino Line that connects Baldwin Park to Downtown Los Angeles and the greater Los Angeles region. In addition, the Baldwin Park Transit Center was built in 2013, which includes a 5 -story parking structure, pedestrian amenities, and a pedestrian bridge that connects the parking structure with the Metrolink Station. With these Improvements, the City focused its attention on the new transit center and its impact on the Downtown, and initiated the development of a Specific Plan for the Downtown that focuses on transit oriented development. The City received a Metro TOD Planning Grant, which is designed to spur the adoption of local land use regulations that are supportive of transit oriented development, to fund the project. C. Purpose The purpose of developing a Specific Plan for Downtown Baldwin Park is to bring revitalizing activities to the Downtown and improve access to all modes of transportation, including transit, walking and bicycling. The Specific Plan is anticipated to facilitate development, especially residential development, in the Downtown area proximate to the Metrolink Station. The primary objectives of the project are to identify land use options that include increased housing densities and mixed uses, as well as create pedestrian linkages between the station, community facilities and major recreation, retail, and residential nodes of activity. The Downtown TOD Specific Plan will help return Downtown Baldwin Park to being an area that is vibrant, walkable, and the heart of City. This Specific Plan will provide opportunities to build on the City's unique historic and cultural characteristics to enhance the Downtown core; take advantage of access to regional transit, Including the Metrolink and numerous Metro and Foothill Transit bus routes that serve Downtown; create a strong community identity and sense of place; provide new employment, housing and shopping opportunities; and strengthen the City's tax base. Several opportunity sites within walking distance of the Metrolink Station and Transit Center parking structure allow significant potential for Infill development and adaptive reuse of existing under-utilized structures to better serve the transit -oriented Downtown area and generate new Investment. The Specific Plan will guide future development of mixed uses In a walkable environment, streamline the development process, and serve as an incentive for economic development. D. Downtown Specific Plan Area Baldwin Park is located In the eastern portion of los Angeles County approximately 15 miles east of downtown Los Angeles and bounded by Irwindale on the north, West Covina on the east, EI Monte on the west and the cities of Industry, West Covina and unincorporated Los Angeles County on the south. 2 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park The Downtown Specific Plan area is approximately 115 gross acres in size and is illustrated in Figure 1-1. The Downtown is anchored by the Ramona Boulevard/Maine Avenue intersection, which is a focal point of the community. The boundary for the Downtown TOD Specific Plan focuses on the commercial area within one-quarter to one-half mile of the Metrolink Station and includes several key sites that would benefit from transit -oriented development. Downtown Baldwin Park is a prime commercial retail area of the City. Nearly half of the existing land uses in Downtown are retail uses. Downtown also includes a high concentration of core government, transportation, and recreation services, including City Hall, the Police Station, Post Office, Valley Water District, Morgan Park, Community Center, and the Baldwin Park Metrolink Station for the San Bernardino Line. Approximately 25% of the Specific Plan land area is owned by the City and/or Successor Agency. E. Recent Planning Efforts Recent planning efforts have positioned the City for a more concerted effort toward Downtown revitalization through transit oriented development. The following are recent and ongoing planning projects that have provided direction and established a foundation for the Downtown TOD Specific Plan. Baldwin Park Zoning Code Update (2012) The City completed an update to its Zoning Code in 2012. A major focus of the update was to incorporate Mixed Use zoning at appropriate locations to support the Mixed Use Land Use Designations identified in the 2020 General Plan. As such, a large portion of the Downtown area (approximately one-third) has been zoned Mixed Use (MU -1), and this mixed use zoning is maintained in this Specific Plan. Downtown is the only location ® Regional Location Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 1 Introduction in the City with MU -1 zoning. The MU -1 zone is intended to create opportunities for development that integrate commercial and residential uses. This zoning will be conducive to creating projects that support transit and walkability. Downtown Specific Plan and EIR (2008) In the mid -2000's, the former CDC approved Bisno Development, LLC, to prepare a Specific Plan to transform Downtown into a mixed use, pedestrian and transit oriented, master -planned urban village. The ambitious Specific Plan included 8,000 residential units, 750,000 square -feet of retail and entertainment space; 3 million square feet of commercial space; a 300 -room full service hotel; and 1,000 -student charter school. This Specific Plan and associated EIR was completed in draft form In 2008, but never adopted due to the economic downturn. While this plan was never resurrected, it generated excitement and momentum for the City Council to move forward with other efforts to revitalize the Downtown through TOD. City of Baldwin Park Civic Center Site, ULI Technical Assistance Panel Report (2011) The Urban Land Institute Technical Assistance Report for the Civic Center area was the result of a day-longfocused effort bytheTechnical Assistance Panel and representatives from the City of Baldwin Park to identify key issues and provide strategies to revitalize Downtown and the Civic Center area into a pedestrian -friendly urban center. Strategies recommended to achieve this vision include: 1) leveraging existing assets and improving linkages; 2) site improvements and development opportunities; and 3) development of future housing. The report recommends the development of a Specific Plan for Downtown Baldwin Park. Envisioning the Mid -Valley Transportation Corridor Plan (2013) Envisioning the Mid -Valley Transportation Corridor Plan was prepared for the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments as an effort to provide high-quality bus rapid transit (BRT) service along the Ramona-Badillo Corridor, serving the cities of EI Monte, Baldwin Park, West Covina, and Covina. The plan identifies a range of improvements that will promote transit use and encourage transit -supportive development, and provides specific plan focus area recommendations for Downtown Baldwin Park that are consistent with the recommendations provided herein. Complete Streets Policy and Design (ongoing) The City adopted a Complete Streets Policy in 2011 to facilitate changes that will enable safe, attractive, and comfortable access and travel for all users, including pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists and public transport users of all ages and abilities. The City is currently working on citywide Complete Streets Design Guidelines and the Non -Motorized Transportation Plan for Downtown. Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 1 Introduction 5 'rho Baldwin Park Transit Center, renovation of ft Arts and Recreation Center (ARC). and expansion of the Senior Center at the Baldwin Pm* Community Conoar ont some of the more recent developments that have improved the image of Downtown Baldwin Park. The Baldwin Park Transit Center Apartments, a transit oriented mixed use development is slated for construedon in 2015. ZI=A FT!WUA-' M-1 TM V'4 OM I I a I and/or Successor Agency Initiated several projects to address conditions of Wight In the Downtown. These Include i I ir- 7711 D A p At area. The ARC is also home to R Park Historical Society Museum. Ynani UTTCOV%?Wvn� Park Community Center in Morgan Park. bus parking and layover areas, and a pedestrian bridge that conn=ects 7thhe parkiffi structure with the Metrolink Station I 1 of the project Includes approximately 70 affordable housing units and,6,000 squa feet of retail space fronting Ramona Boulevard and within walking distance of t Metrolink Staft-t. 6 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park G. Specific Plan Goals As guided by the Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan, the City "seeks to strengthen the economic vitality and aesthetic character of the downtown through the establishment of a mixed use pedestrian district which builds on Livable Communities principles and techniques." The goals for the Downtown TOD Specific Plan are consistent with guiding City policy and this Specific Plan reinforces General Plan goals. The following is a summary of the overall goals Identified by the City for the Specific Plan: • Leverage the location of the Metrolink Station to bring revitalizing activities to Downtown; • Make the City friendlier towards all modes of transportation, Including transit, walking and bicycling; • Increasing transit ridership and regional accessibility; • Create a strong community identity and sense of place in the heart of town; • Increase level of goods and services available to residents of the community; • Provide new employment and housing opportunities; • Attract shoppers from outside the community; and • Strengthen the City's tax base. H. Metro TOD Planning Grant Program The Downtown TOD Specific Plan was funded largely by the Metro TOD Planning Grant Program, which is is designed to spur the adoption of local land use regulations that are supportive of transit oriented development in Los Angeles County. This Specific Plan also supports the goals of Metro. Goals for the program include the following: • Increase access to transit by assisting local governments to accelerate the adoption of TOD regulatory frameworks; • Improve utilization of public transit by reducing the number of modes of transportation necessary to access regional and local transit; • Further the reduction of greenhouse gases through encouraging in -fill development along transit corridors and transit use; and • Support and implement sustainable development principles. I. Administration 1. General Plan Consistency Per Ca lifornia State law, specific plans must be Interna llyconsistent with the jurisdiction's general plan. The Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan (adopted 2002) regulates the land Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 1 Introduction 7 uses in the Downtown TOD Specific Plan area. Where Specific Plan zoning is inconsistent with the 2020 General Plan, the General Plan is being updated concurrent with this Specific Plan to ensure consistency between the two documents. With the exception of a few areas of land use change, the Specific Plan is consistent with all elements of the 2020 General Plan. The Specific Plan is supportive of General Plan goals and policies to "establish a pedestrian core for Downtown..." and "pursue development of a Specific Plan for the Downtown to provide further direction on the precise land use, circulation and public improvements for the area" (2020 General Plan, Land Use Element, Goal 8.0 and associated policies). 2. Applicability and Conformity of Development No construction, modification, addition, or placement of any building or structure shall occur, nor shall any new use commence on any lot, on or after the effective date of this Specific Plan that is not in conformity with the provisions of this Specific Plan. If the Zoning Administrator determines that an existing use or structure in the Specific Plan area is an existing nonconforming use that does not have to be brought into conformance with the Specific Plan, the regulations and standards of Chapter 153 (Zoning Code) of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code shall apply. The provisions of this Specific Plan shall not apply to development projects for which a complete application has been received by the appropriate City office on or before the effective date of this Specific Plan. However, applicants for such projects may elect to comply with the provisions herein in lieu of the former provisions. Applications for projects whose entitlements and/or permits have expired or were denied will be required to conform to this Specific Plan. 3. Approval Process The zoning Administrator shall be responsible for administering the provisions of the Downtown TOD Specific Plan In accordance with the provisions of this Specific Plan, the State of California Government Code, the Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan, and Chapter 153 (Zoning Code) of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code. All development projects and new uses shall be subject to the review and appeal procedures, findings and provisions of the Zoning Code, such as Conditional Use Permits, Variances, Design Review, etc. As public or private entities propose new projects on properties within the Specific Plan area, staff will review each project for compliance with Specific Plan provisions and standards contained in this document. While not prescriptive, staff should also use the illustrative prototypes and design guidelines as models of desired development. New projects will be evaluated by staff based on site-specific conditions and the surrounding context. Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park 4. Maintenance and Update of the Specific Plan As comprehensive and detailed as this Specific Plan is, it is unlikely that every possible situation can be anticipated for a 20 -year planning horizon. Therefore, in accordance with regular reports to the Planning Commission concerning the implementation of this Specific Plan, the Community Development Department is responsible for maintaining and updating this Specific Plan, as applicable. S. Application of the CEQA Process This Specific Plan was reviewed pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). As such, a program -level Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for the Specific Plan. The EIR identified the potential environmental effects of the development proposed In this Specific Plan. The Program EIR analyzed development scenarlosforthe horizon year 2035 to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of the Downtown TOD Specific Plan. The horizon year development capacity represents an estimate as to the overall development capacity of the Specific Plan area within the foreseeable future based on market analysis and environmental constraints. Pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, all discretionary actions must be reviewed for their potential effects on the environment. Thus, future discretionary actions within the Specific Plan area will require subsequent environmental review. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 15162 of CEQA Guidelines, subsequent site-specific development within the Specific Plan area requiring a discretionary permit will be reviewed to determine whether the Specific Plan EIR adequately addresses the impacts of the proposed site-specific development project, in which case no further environmental analysis is needed, or if: 1) The proposed site-specific development represents a substantial change from the Specific Plan analyzed in the Final EIR (such as a Specific Plan amendment) that could result in new significant Impacts not addressed in the Specific Plan EIR or that could result in substantially more severe significant impacts than those identified In the Specific Plan EIR. 2) Substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the proposed permit is being undertaken as compared to the circumstances assumed in the Final EIR. Such substantial changes could Include (but are not necessarily limited to) substantial changes in land use or, circulation patterns surrounding the Specific Plan area. 3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known at the time the Final EIR was certified, shows that, as the result of the proposed project, either new significant impacts would Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 1 Introduction 9 occur, significant impacts identified in the Final EIR will be substantially more severe, or mitigation measures proposed in the Final EIR are Infeasible or not included in the proposed project. In reviewing subsequent development proposals within the Specific Plan area to determine whether any of the above findings can be made, the impacts of subsequent development proposals will be compared to the level of impacts addressed in the Final EIR. To accomplish this, the City may require technical reports for traffic, noise, air quality, biological resources, and/or cultural resources to be prepared. Generally, site-specific development projects consistent with the Specific Plan or projects that involve minor changes to the Specific plan will not require such reports, while projects involving substantial changes in proposed land use or a large increase in the amount of development permitted by the Specific Plan may require one or more technical reports. Pursuant to Sections 15162 and 15163 of CEQA Guidelines, a subsequent or supplemental EIR would be required only if any of the above findings are made regarding a proposed development permit. If none of these above findings can be made, Section 15162(a) of CEQA Guidelines requires the City to prepare an addendum to the Specific Plan EIR. Section 15164 of CEPA Guidelines states that an addendum to a previously -certified EIR shall be prepared if some changes or additions are necessaryto a project, but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. An addendum, unlike a subsequent EIR and supplement to an EIR, need not be circulated for public review and can be included in or attached to the final EIR. J. Organization of Specific Plan The Downtown TOD Specific Plan is organized to provide a framework for private and public realm improvements in the Downtown. The plan is organized as follows: Chapter 1: Introduction — Explains the Specific Plan's background and purpose, identifies the planning area, describes recent planning efforts and development activity, specifies the City's goals, and outlines the organization of the Specific Plan document. This chapter also sets forth the administration of the Specific Plan. Chapter 2: Planning and Design Process — Describes the planning and design process, including issues and opportunities identified early on in the project and community involvement during the process. 10 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park Chapter 3: Design Concept — Presents the overall urban design framework for the Downtown and highlights the key design parameters that will guide the character of the private and public realms. Chapter 4: Zoning and Development Standards — Sets forth the zoning, permit- ted uses and development standards for the Specific Plan area. Chapter 5: Design Standards and Guidelines — Details the design standards and guidelines, including site planning and architecture, that will shape the charac- ter of development in the Downtown. Chapter ga Circulation and Parking — Details the circulation Improvements for the Downtown, including automobile, transit, pedestrian and bicycle use. The circulation recommendations support the "Complete Streets" concept of pro- viding for all modes of transportation. This chapter also sets forth the parking requirements for uses in the Specific Plan area. Chapter 7: infrastructure — Identifies existing Infrastructure and any necessary Im- provements to the water, sewer, storm water systems, as well as for the dry utllltles. Chapter 8: Implementation — Outlines the implementation strategy and steps on how to best move the Specific Plan forward. Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 1 Introduction 11 kM2 12 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park Planning and Design Process A. Introduction The Downtown Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Specific Plan was prepared through a participatory process that engaged the community, and informed and involved the decision makers throughout the planning process. In keeping with the goals of the Metro TOD Planning Grant Program, the Specific Plan process also educated the community about the benefits of TOD. The Specific Plan was generated by the expectation that enhancing the Metrolink Station and its relationship to Downtown will not only help meet local and regional transportation goals, but also will work toward fulfilling the City's vision for a revitalized Downtown. Therefore, the planning and design process actively incorporated a discussion of TOD principles through all phases of Specific Plan development. B. Issues and Opportunities The project was initiated through an intensive data gathering process, which included reviewing and evaluating relevant planning documents, performing an existing physical conditions analysis of the Downtown, preparing baseline studies, and identifying issues and opportunities. This phase of the project provided an initial level of understanding of the Specific Plan area and framed the direction and recommendations of the Specific Plan. The key issues and opportunities are described below. Downtown Identity There is currently little unique Identity or sense of place in Downtown. With the potential for a significant amount of new development in a mixed use setting, there is an opportunity to create a strong Identity for the area through architectural, landscape and open space design features, as well as public art. Two blocks fronting Ramona Boulevard are lined with small pedestrian -oriented shops, which was the predominant development pattern during the time of Red Car Line. There is also a vacant structure on the edge of Downtown that was a former Red Car charging station Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 2 Planning and Design Process 13 The former Red Car charging station building has symbolic value in Baldwin Park and should be placed on the Local Historic Register. This structure could be adaptively reused to house the Baldwin Park Historical Society Museum and/or a cafd, art gallery, or coffee shop. Preservation of this historic structure through adaptive reuse will add to Downtown's identity and increase local character. Downtown is the civic and cultural heart of the community. The character and design of lownt should focus on enhancing Its civic status and importance In the community, as well as building upon traditional downtown fabric. that has historic value for the community. Building upon this traditional downtown fabric will help return Downtown Baldwin Park to being an area that is the identifiable heart of the City. In addition, Downtown lacks gateway elements at key intersections to signal entry Into Downtown. Gateways should engage the viewer from the street and encourage people to enter Downtown and Morgan Park. Gateway elements could include monument signage, increased landscaping, lighting, and/or public art. Finally, to further establish a strong identity for Downtown, the character and design of Downtown should focus on enhancing its civic status and importance in the community. Downtown Baldwin Park is currently the cultural and civic heart of the City with well-established government and community facilities, and the historic fabric of pedestrian -oriented shops along a portion of Ramona Boulevard. There is opportunity to capitalize on the concentration of community amenities, and enhance connections between them. There is also an opportunity to create additional public and civic gathering spaces, particularly around City Hall, which currently lacks a gracious and highly visible setting. 14 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park Ramona Boulevard northeastdirection through City 1 carriesft 41,Ramona Sf m-L*-?sk,!jtCvrklng fronting Ramona Boulevard d w, N blacks i problem. ik q M M dI MIW!Nb r# f" K e. Ni' f providefor pedestrians. bicydes and transit, as well, asbottlernorth and south sides with design and streetscape elernerft. There is an opportunity to convertsome of M.. to expand the pedestrianenvironment g COIN* ": a ' r, " �' � ii x" At 41104114W i IRIWO o umes, there is a major opportunity a oraw dine and recreate with wollwplann*d and aesthetically pleasing development and public n, 0oweitawn. CurreFMV, Ramona Boulevard major barrier between the north a sevth sides of to and presents sense of place. With increated Hi and pedestrian the Boulevard can Downtown'swMbuft greatly to withinand become a greater part of the pedestrian Ovulation sYstem Downtown. Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 2 Planning and Design Process 15 Building frontages disrupted by driveways and par ldng to create aninconsistent pedestrian edge and detract from a sense of place. Pedestrian Environment Despite the two blocks of pedestrian -oriented shops along Ramona Boulevard, t pedestrian environment In the majority of Downtown Baldwin Park is challenginli There are several segments along Ramona Boulevard and Maine Avenue whe the street frontage Is primarily parking lets. The area is currently characterized discontinuity as there Is a changing scale of buildings, various street patterns a irregular blsizes. R ock F x im, lr-qTo A dUi-FUTAC49 M& i Downtown. In addon, there is currently a lack of pedestrian linkages between the Metroll station, City Hall, Morgan Park, and the retang area of Downtown. There are multip ................ sidewalks, improved crosswalks of Ramona Boulevard at major Intersections, t addition of a midblock crosswalk, and the creation of an alley walkway system provide alternative Unkages; and routes. These can reinforce both, the livability %fir 'IT'i'VenT Opportunity Sites There are also a significant number of large parking lots, as well as potentla unused right-of-way. Parking lets and underutilized parcels oftentimes represe ;Uzz revitalization of an area. Developing larger, unified projects can reinforce mixed u proximate to regional transit. 16 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park There is a significant opportunity to encourage infill development on City -owned parcels. The City of Baldwin Park and/or Successor Agency owns several key parcels In the Downtown, which offer the potential for public-private partnerships to generate new development. In addition, existing businesses and new development should be encouraged to share parking when feasible. On underutilized sites with multiple owners, redevelopment tends be more long-term. Community outreach and participation was conducted for the Specific Plan at milestone stages of the process to ensure that the Plan expresses the vision, goals and ideas of the community as a whole. Input was obtained through a series of public workshops, where stakeholders including property owners, businesses, residents, developers, and Interested parties participated through interactive group discussion and feedback on the topics and direction of the Plan. These workshops were very productive in discussing key issues, concerns and preferences, and In generating trust for the planning process and community support for the Specific Plan. Three public workshops were held at milestone stages of the projectto present findings and solicit input from the community. The first workshop presented the background and purpose, existing conditions, and key opportunities for the Downtown, and solicited input from the community on their issues, goals and visions. The second workshop presented the preliminary land use, circulation and urban design plan, and gathered input on the overall land use and design for the Downtown as well as circulation and parking concepts. The third workshop presented and obtained feedback on the Public Review Draft Specific Plan. Study sessions were also held with the City Council and Planning Commission in order to provide decision -maker continuity and feedback throughout the duration of the project. These study sessions generated significant dialogue and provided valuable direction during the preparation of the Downtown TOD Specific Plan. Underutilized and Cied parcels provide opportunitles lbr Infill transit -oriented development ftt will enhance the activlty In Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 2 Planning and Design Process 17 D. Specific Plan Principles Throughout the public participation process, the community recognized that the location of Metrolink Station is a key component of Downtown revitalization. Improving pedestrian linkages between the station and Downtown core, providing Downtown housing opportunities to support transit, and enhancing identity to draw transit users into the Downtown all contribute to creating a vibrant, mixed use urban village. With these objectives In mind, the principles of transit oriented development guide this Specific Plan. The following are the guiding principles for the Downtown TOD Specific Plan: • Create vibrant and diverse commercial corridors. • Design a pedestrian -friendly environment with well-designed buildings, attractive streetscapes, and engaging public spaces. • Create multi -modal streets accommodate pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicles. • Create a mix of uses with residential and employment densities that support transit use. • Offer a range of housing options proximate to transit. 18 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park Transit oriented development Is development that Is located within easy walking distance of a major transit stop, generally with a mix of residential, employment, retail, and complementing public uses designed for pedestrians without excluding the auto. Transit oriented development can be new construction or redevelopment of one or more buildings wherein the design and orientation facilitate transit use, and the density is appropriate to the setting. The location, design, configuration, and m& of uses In a transit oriented development provide an alternative to current suburban development trends by emphasizing a pedestrion-oriented environment and reinforcing the use of public transportation. Transit oriented development significantly reduces auto dependency, helps revitalize areas, and offers a new model for managing growth. Successful TOD projects in Southern Calirfornia include Del Mar Station �i4 in Pasadena, Soco Walk in Fullerton, and Mission Meridian \Allage In South Pasadena. Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 2 Planning and Design Process 19 This page Intentionally left bhmk 20 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park Design Concept A. Introduction This chapter presents the overall design framework for the long-term development potential of Downtown Baldwin Park, Including public and private realm improvements. The goal of the Urban Design Framework is to develop the Specific Plan area holistically, as a system of spaces, structures, and environments integrated Into its surroundings rather than as linear strips of unrelated buildings and undefined streetscapes. A clear framework with a strong sense of place provides visitors and residents with an understanding of how to easily and safely find their way around and to efficiently identify uses and activities. Arrangement of land uses into identifiable nodes, improved streetscapes, connected open spaces, improved linkages to transit, and enhanced landmarks and features will help make the Specific Plan area an accessible, distinctive downtown. These factors will come together to help establish a cohesive and positive identity for Downtown Baldwin Park. The overarching strategy is to transform Downtown into a vital and vibrant destination that serves local residents, employees and visitors. This strategy calls for the intensification of land uses and prioritization of public improvements to create a distinctive and enriching environment. A crucial component of this transformation is to reconceptualize Ramona Boulevard as a street that serves multiple functions and promotes walkability, rather than acting solely as a major thoroughfare for autos. B. Urban Design Framework The Urban Design Framework, as illustrated in Figure 3-1, sets forth the overall urban design approach that will achieve the Specific Plan's goal of transforming Downtown Baldwin Park into a vibrant transit -oriented district. This will be achieved by establishing Downtown as the core of the community —a place for living, shopping, recreation and leisure, City government, and local and regional transit connectivity — and increasing pedestrian connectivity between these uses. The adjacency of the City Hall complex to the Metrolink Station, Morgan Park, and the pedestrian -scaled retail uses along portions of Ramona Boulevard and Maine Avenue make the area a Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 3 Design Concept 21 Elements of the Urban Design Framework Historic Downtown Retail Fabric–A strong, pedestrian -scaled retail environment already occurs along portions of Ramona Boulevard and Maine Avenue, providing an anchor for a walkable and vibrant Downtown. Active Retail Frontage – A strong building edge with retail uses should occur in new and infill development to help strengthen a "main street" feel in the heart of Downtown. ow Grand Pedestrian Boulevard – With 230 feet of right-of-way width on Ramona Boulevard, It is possible to greatly expand the pedestrian environment and transform the street into grand pedestrian promenade that serves all transportation modes. Angled Parking –With pedestrian improvements to Ramona Boulevard, one row of angled parking will be retained. Civic Plaza – A new civic plaza is planned on the underutilized City -owned site across from City Hall. This provides opportunity to enhance Downtown's civic status, increase open space, and provide a location for multiple civic and community functions. an Streetscape Improvements – Upgraded streetscape improvements, including wider sidewalks, a consistent street tree palette, and pedestrian -scaled street lighting, support a safe and attractive pedestrian -friendly environment. Intersection Improvements and Signalized Crosswalks – Improved crosswalks and pedestrian signals at intersections along Ramona Boulevard will provide greater visibility while enhancing safety, accessibility and connectivity for pedestrians. Wider crosswalks with enhanced paving can help reduce the perceived width of the Ramona Boulevard and provide a safer pedestrian environment. A new midblock crosswalk on Ramona Blvd will connect to the new midblock walkway to the Metrolink Station. Pedestrian Railroad Crossing – A redesigned pedestrian environment at railroad crossings of Ramona Boulevard and Pacific Avenue will greatly increase pedestrian safety and circulation. Off -Street Walkway System and Connections to Metrolink Station – An off-street walkway 47-4 system, using improved alleys and new pedestrian paths, will offer continuous pedestrian circulation between community facilities, the Metrolink Station, and within and between new mixed use and retail developments, greatly Improving the pedestrian appeal of Downtown. Gateways – Major and minor gateways announce entry to Downtown. They are marked by unique design features that clearly communicate Identity, including: Increased landscaping, public art, signage, lighting, and/or paving treatments. ® Opportunity Sites – Key sites are identified for infill development or full scale redevelopment based on factors such as ownership patterns (many are City -owned), and the number and size of contiguous underutilized properties and/or underutilized right-of-way.. New Mixed Use Development– The approved 70 -unit mixed use affordable housing project fronting Ramona Boulevard will support the Metrolink Station, provide more housing choices, and complement a mixed use environment In Downtown. Adaptive Reuse of Historic Structure – The former Red Car charging station building has symbolic value In Baldwin Park. Preservation of this historic structure through adaptive reuse will add to Downtown's unique identity. Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 3 Design Concept 23 cornerstone for a walkable and vibrant community. These qualities will be augmented with a civic plaza, active storefronts, higher density housing, and pedestrian nodes replete with amenities such as high-quality street furniture, and lighting. The Urban Design Framework (Figure 3-1) identifies the key strategy elements for successfully improving Downtown, as well as many of the existing features which shape the nature of the planning area. These elements are identified below and discussed in greater detail in the following sections of the Plan. C. Land Use Vision The land use vision for Downtown Baldwin Park builds on the already well-established mix of existing uses in the Downtown area, including government and community facilities, open space, transit, and the historicfabric of pedestrian -oriented shops along a portion of Ramona Boulevard and Maine Avenue. With the location and clustering of existing uses, Downtown is well positioned to become a mixed-use destination with active local -serving commercial uses for Baldwin Park residents as well as visitors. The Downtown Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Specific Plan provides an urban design opportunity to create a unique sense of place by building upon these existing elements. By leveraging Downtown's existing assets, improving linkages between existing uses and the Metrolink Station, capitalizing on transit oriented development opportunities, and bringing more housing into Downtown, the area has the potential to become a vibrant and economically successful destination. Opportunity Sites Key opportunities sites are identified for infill development orfull scale redevelopment based on factors such as the number and size of contiguous underutilized properties and/or underutilized parking lots or right-of-ways, ownership patterns (many are City -owned), and potential for creating a unified project. Opportunity sites should be prioritized and/or marketed by the City as catalytic sites for new development in Downtown. There is a significant opportunity to encourage public improvements and infill development on City -owned parcels. While sites with multiple private owners tend be more long-term opportunity sites, several opportunity sites are City -owned, and one site is under single ownership. A unique opportunity site in Downtown Is the City -owned Park -N -Ride lot on Ramona Boulevard and Badillo Street, which offers the potential for a higher density residential or mixed use project. This site includes an important vacant structure its eastern edge that was a former Red Car charging station and has symbolic value for the community. Development of this site should include adaptive reuse of this building to a restaurant or similar use that will provide enjoyment to the community, increase local character, and create a landmark feature in Downtown. This structure should be placed on the Local Historic Register to ensure its preservation. 24 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park Mixed Use Development The land use vision also builds on the City's current policy direction and regulatory framework. The City of Baldwin Park completed an update to its Zoning Code in 2012. A major focus of the Zoning Code Update was to incorporate Mixed Use zoning at appropriate locations to support the Mixed Use Land Use Designations identified in the 2020 General Plan. As such, a large portion of the Downtown area (approximately one-third) has been zoned Mixed Use (MU -1), and this mixed use zoning is maintained in this Specific Plan. In a broad sense, a mixed use project can constitute an area, a site, or a single building, which blends a combination of residential, commercial, cultural, or institutional uses. However, the whole development's links to, and position in, its community are as important as the mix itself; the functions of mixed use development must be physically and functionally integrated and provide pedestrian connections. New development throughout Downtown should include a mix of residential, retail, office, and civic uses. New infill mixed-use and retail development should be targeted in the heart of Downtown, with pedestrian -oriented retail uses lining Ramona Boulevard and Maine Avenue. Developing larger, unified projects can reinforce mixed use synergy and offer the possibility for meaningful public open space areas within projects. Residential uses should be located in Downtown to increase pedestrian activity, particularly at night and on weekends. Single-family residential uses should remain focused in the existing neighborhoods that surround Downtown, while new higher density residential uses should increase in the Downtown area, proximate to the Metrolink Station, City Hall, Morgan Park, and the employment and retailing uses in Downtown. Active Retail Frontage A key method to creating a walkable and vibrant urban environment is to provide pedestrians with interesting things to look at and do between destinations. A continuous retail fagade with attractive shopping displays that open out to the sidewalk can provide that appeal. A goal for the Specific Plan Is to increase the pedestrian traffic along Ramona Boulevard and Maine Avenue. As such, the following street segments are defined as Active Retail Frontage areas within the Specific Plan (see Figure 3-1) and require active, pedestrian -oriented retail lining the street: • Maine Avenue between Clark Street and Ramona Boulevard; • North side of Ramona Boulevard between Cesar Chavez Drive and Downing Avenue; and • South side of Ramona Boulevard between Sterling Way and Bogart Avenue. The presence of retail uses at the ground floor level, combined with streetscape improvements and pedestrian amenities as described in the following sections, will Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 3 Design Concept 25 Based on the high value community space,on open integration of plazas and courtyards within commercial use development Is provide pedestrians a more interesting and attractive Downtown experience. Specific standards for Active Retail Frontage areas are provided In Chapter 4 (Zoning and Development Standards) of this plan. ST o- Tb support and foster a mixed use setting in Downtown, new open space should be provided to complement and connect to the existing open space and facilities at Morgan Park. New open spaces and plazas will increase pedestrian activity and improve destination appeal. Open spaces may consist of parks, plazas, courtyards, green spaces, as well as pathways and sidewalks that run along streets or through developments. New open spaces should include privately -owned plazas and courtyards In new retail, residential, commercial and mixed use settings. Small gathering spaces and places should be created within new developments to complement the existing open space in Downtown and to provide Informal and small scale open space opportunities, including outdoor dining. 26 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park D. Civic Park Downtown is already the cultural and civic heart of town with Morgan Park, Baldwin Park Community Center, City Hall, and the Arts and Recreation Center (ARC). With the City -owned property and right-of-way across Maine Avenue from City Hall, there is tremendous opportunity to further enhance Downtown's civic status and importance in the community by transforming this underutilized land into a usable civic and com- munity space. Converting the site into open space and using City Hall as an anchor would leverage the site's strong location while mitigating the poor frontage and inef- ficient shape, which make the site less feasible for other types of development. The new civic park will also augment the amount of open space available for Baldwin Park residents, and complement recreational facilities and activities at Morgan Park. Creating a civic park across Maine Avenue with direct links and views to City Hall will allow City Hall to be better connected, both physically and visually, to the sur- rounding Downtown area. This will allow City Hall to become a more vibrant, usable and celebrated focal point of the Downtown. It should have an amenity -rich environ- ment in which people can passively linger and enjoy. Amenity elements could include a plaza, street furniture, landscaped open space, public art, a water feature, small performance space and concessions that create a rich, textured urban oasis. Areas immediately adjacent to retail buildings could be suitable for outdoor dining uses as- sociated with a restaurant or cafe. This flexible space could be used for a variety of community events such as art and music festivals, civic events and ceremonies, etc. For larger events, Maine Avenue could be temporarily closed with bollards to provide one continuous open space to City Hall. Some design considerations include; • It will be necessary to provide enhanced crosswalks across Maine Avenue to provide direct pedestrian linkages between City Hall and the civic park. • To create an attractive retail edge to the plaza and integrate local businesses with the park, rear facade improvements will be important for the retail properties to the north that front Ramona Boulevard. The increased visibility and activity could act as a redevelopment catalyst for these properties. • There is a design opportunity to link the civic park to Ramona Boulevard by developing a walkway through the retail buildings fronting Ramona and providing a direct pedestrian connection to the park. • It will be necessaryto create an alley behind the retail shops fronting Ramona Boulevard to maintain rear property access for those commercial uses. Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 3 Design Concept 27 • In order to maximize usable space and allow a larger site the portion of Maine Avenue between Sterling Way and Pacific Avenue could be closed, either fully or partially (one lane only). This may, however, cause impacts to vehicular circulation and will need to be studied further before the design is finalized. E. Ramona Boulevard Ramona Boulevard traverses the heart of Downtown and has a unique form and character within the Downtown compared to the rest of the corridor. From Baldwin Park Boulevard to Bogart Avenue, the Pacific Electric's San Bernardino Line's right-of- way was converted into parking bays on one or both sides of the Ramona Boulevard. The street is characterized by retail and commercial buildings along frontage drives parallel to Ramona Boulevard. These parking bays are one-way drives with angled parking on both sides and a sidewalk beside the storefronts. While this configuration allows pedestrian circulation to move off Ramona Boulevard and onto calmer, safer frontage drives, the width of Ramona Boulevard itself creates a significant physical, psychological, and visual barrier between the north and south sides of Downtown and a long crossing distance for pedestrians. With 230 feet of right-of-way width on Ramona Boulevard, it is possible to greatly expand and improve the pedestrian environment and transform the street into a grand pedestrian boulevard that serves all transportation modes. Streetscape enhancements along Ramona Boulevard are particularly important to reduce the perceived width of the street and provide identity for the Downtown area. As such, recommended improvements to Ramona Boulevard include: • Remove half of the angled parking use the space to greatly widen sidewalks adjacent to the storefronts. • Significantly widen crosswalks and add special paving at intersections. • Improve pedestrian signals at intersections. • Add new mid -block crosswalk signal, which links to a mid -block pedestrian walkway to the Metrolink Station. • Redesign the pedestrian environment at railroad crossings of Ramona Boulevard and Pacific Avenue. • Create a major gateway into Downtown at the intersection of Ramona Boulevard and Baldwin Park Boulevard. • Add striped buffer to protect bikes lanes. These improvements are described and illustrated in detail in Chapter 6 (Circulation and Parking) of this plan. With these improvements, Ramona Boulevard will become an environment focused on more than just automobile use; it will become a "complete street" that also acknowledges the importance of pedestrians, bicyclists and transit users. 28 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park The vision for Ramona Boulevard is to create a grand pedestrian boulevard and enhance the visual presence of the corridor. With 230 feet of right-of-way width, there Is a major opportunity to reconceptualize Ramona Boulevard by widening the sidewalk to be more pedestrian•orlented with design and streetscape elements, as well as have more curb appeal with new and infill liner retail uses. Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 3 Design Concept 29 The intersection of Ramona Boulevard and Baldwin Park Boulevard Is highly visible and the entry to Downtown from the west. By improving the City -owned land at the four corners of this intersection, it can become an Iconic gateway that improves visual appearance and creates identity. Drought tolerant landscaping to Gateway monument Polm trees create gateway on the frame the gateway signage signage to Downtown north side of Ramona Boulevard Accent paving on widened Drought tolerant landscape and palms create gate - crosswalk way effect on the south side of Ramona Boulevard 30 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park F. Streetscape Improvements Streetscape improvements are meant to enhance and unify the visual and spatial experience of the driver and pedestrian, and help provide key linkages between the activity nodes and neighborhoods in the City. The streetscape environment gives the user a sense of direction and place within the City and the Downtown area. Recommended streetscape improvements consist of an Interrelated palette of street trees, street furniture, street lighting, signage and landscaping. Public art can also have a role In the streetscape palette. The streetscape improvements are tied to Improving pedestrian connectivity as well as the pedestrian environment in the area. 1. Street Trees Street trees play an important role in establishing district cohesion and identity. A uniform pattern of street trees along a street not only provides shade and visual consistency but also enhances the area's image of stability and longevity. A uniform pattern of street trees increases connectivity and sense of cohesion on a pedestrian and auto -oriented scale, as well as offers a pleasant sidewalk experience. Downtown currently contains a few predominant street tree species, however, in some areas there are abrupt changes in the street tree pattern, giving an inconsistent and fragmented look to the character of the streets. The goal is to reinforce the existing pattern of street trees, retaining mature street trees where possible, and to create a unified street frontage along major streets in the Downtown. The major streets of focus in the Specific Plan area are Ramona Boulevard and Maine Avenue, which are the two commercial corridors that go through the Downtown; and Bogart Avenue and Downing Avenue, which run adjacent to the Metrolink Station and therefore experience increased pedestrian activity. Following is a description of the existing street tree conditions along these streets. Existing Street Trees Ramona Boulevard Ramona Boulevard is characterized predominantly bythe presence of large Ficus trees along the north and south sides of the street stretching from Baldwin Park Avenue to Maine Avenue. Along both sides, there is also a mixture of Mexican Fan Palm, Olive, Jacaranda, St. John's Bread, and Carrotwood trees found randomly between the Ficus trees. Morgan Park sits on the north side of Ramona Boulevard between Baldwin Park Avenue and Cesar Chavez Drive, contributing the lush look of this portion of the Boulevard. The southeast corner of Ramona Avenue and Baldwin Park Boulevard is planted with a mixture of Eucalyptus, King Palm, and Jacaranda trees. Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 3 Design Concept 31 From Maine Avenue to Bogart Avenue, the south side maintains the same characteristics, but the north side is planted with Sweet Gum trees. East of Bogart Avenue, up to the railroad tracks, consists of primarily Oleander and Heavenly Bamboo shrubs with a few intermittent Sweet Gum and Jacaranda trees. East of the railroad tracks, Ramona Boulevard's north side is void of street trees while the south is shaded by the sparse plantings of Canary Island Pine and Sycamore trees in the MTA parking lot. The center median that runs from Baldwin Park Avenue to Bogart Avenue is planted with turf and has a fairly consistent palette of Sweet Gum and Crape Myrtle trees with occasional Magnolia trees. Maine Avenue On Maine Avenue, north of Ramona Boulevard, there is a pattern of alternating Queen Palm and Crape Myrtle trees within a planted parkway along both the east and west sides of the street. On few occasions this pattern is interrupted by Irregular planting Intervals. There is an abrupt break in pattern along the portion of Maine Avenue between Palm Avenue and Clark Street, which is planted with Eucalyptus trees. At the corners of Maine Avenue and Pacific Avenue are clusters of Mexican Fan Palms. Downing Avenue The portion of Downing Avenue within the Specific Plan area is planted with an alternating pattern of Crape Myrtle trees and Indian Hawthorn shrubs on the northwestern side along the Metrolink parking lot. The southeastern side is void of trees due to the adjacent housing with shallow lawns and driveways. Bogart Avenue North of Ramona Boulevard, the west side of Bogart Avenue in the Specific Plan boundary is planted with Sweet Gum trees and Carrotwood trees. The east side of the street, fronting the residential uses, is void of trees with the exception of one Carrotwood tree. South of Ramona Boulevard, the predominant tree on both sides of Bogart Avenue is the Crape Myrtle with the exception of two Bottle Brush trees and a Sweet Gum tree at the corner of Ramona Boulevard, and a Strawberry Tree near the Arts and Recreation Center. The south side of Bogart Avenue directly adjacent to the railroad tracks maintains an alternating pattern of Crape Myrtle trees and Indian Hawthorne shrubs. Recommended Street Trees Table 3-1 lists the types of street trees that are considered appropriate for Downtown Baldwin Park. These general recommendations should be refined in a Streetscape Plan for Downtown, where a specific tree palette would be Identified. The spacing should be considered on a block by block basis so that all field conditions are addressed, including driveway aprons, street lights, and utilities. A Streetscape Plan would also implement the action items of the Sustainability Element of the General Plan to develop an Urban Forestry Plan with a comprehensive street tree palette. 32 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park Table 3-1: Recommended Street Tree TVpes for Major Streets In the Specific Plan Area Nona= HE= Ramona Boulevard - Center Median Crape Myrtle, Southern Medium to large accent tree with Chinese Pistache, Ginkgo Magnolia, Sweet Gum upright canopy. Provides colored foliage Biloba, Sweet Gum and/or blooms. Ramona Boulevard - Outer Median Carrotwood, Ficus, Large, spreading, canopy tree. Uniform Chinese Pistache, Southern Jacaranda, Mexican Fan or alternating pattern for consistency. Magnolia, Brisbane Box Palm, Olive Tree, St. John's Bread, Sweet Gum Ramona Boulevard - Sidewalk Ficus Pedestrian -scale canopy tree. Provides Crape Myrtle, Gold colored foliage and/or blooms. Trumpet Tree, Gold Medallion Tree Maine Avenue Crape Myrtle, Mexican Fan Pedestrian -scale canopy tree. Provides Crape Myrtle, Queen Palm, Palm, Queen Palm colored foliage and/or blooms. Gold Medallion Tree Bogart Avenue Bottle Brush, Carrotwood, Small, low canopy tree. Provides colored Australian Willow, Gold Crape Myrtle, Sweet Gum, foliage or bloom for accent. Medallion Tree, Lemon Strawberry Tree Bottle Brush Downing Avenue Carrotwood, Canary Island Small, low canopy tree. Provides colored Australian Willow, Gold Palm, Crape Myrtle, foliage or bloom for accent. Medallion Tree, Lemon Jacarancla Bottle Brush Public Review Draft ' December uoz4 Chapter Design Concept 33 2. Pedestrian Amenities A goal of the Specific Plan is to create an engaging, pedestrian -oriented streetscape in the Downtown area. Amenity elements include: street trees (described above) and lights, street furniture, wayfinding, and landscaped open space. In some instances, public art and water features may also be appropriate where it serves to interpret and draw attention to the history or culture of the area. In general, the Downtown is either lacking in or has inconsistent patterns of these amenities. While the ultimate goal is to provide adequate amenities in a consistent pattern; the City's short-term efforts and resources should be focused in certain areas. In general, pedestrian amenities should be focused along the Ramona Boulevard and Maine Avenue corridors in locations that have the highest amount of pedestrian activity, particularly in the areas designated as Active Retail Frontage (Figure 3-1). 3. Street Furniture A new palette of site furnishings that includes benches, trash receptacles, tree grates, and lighting will help better define Downtown's character and give it a coherent look and feel. Street furniture will help unify the Downtown as well as provide essential seating, trash receptacles and bicycle racks to draw people into the area, engage them to stay a while, and invite them to take care of their community. The palette of street furniture should be selected to bring comfort, scale and design expression tothe streetscape, while also complementing the surrounding architecture. It also must be highly durable and easy to maintain. The City's climate and setting should be taken Into account In furniture selection. All elements of the furniture palette should have a uniform look even if they come from different manufacturers and vendors. 4. Lighting Lighting is a key component that promotes safety and helps to create an appealing walkable environment. Lighting provides spatial definition to the sidewalk, adds ambianceto neighborhood settings, and affords a sense ofsecurityto users. Pedestrian - scaled lighting should be focused along retail streets in the Downtown. The selected light fixtures shall adhere to guidelines set forth by the Dark Sky Association to protect the area's view of stars. Light fixtures in the public right-of-way shall also follow the Southern California Edison (SCE) standards for maintenance. 5. Wayfinding Wayfinding is the way in which people orient themselves in physical space and navigate from place to place; it is how people choose a path within the built environment. 34 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park Examples of sweet furriftm, ranging from contemporary to traditional in dosign. A specific street furniture palette should be selected for Downtown Baldwin Park in a Streetsespe Plan. Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 3 Design Concept 35 Effective signage enables a person to find his or her way to a given destination and Informs them that they have arrived at a special destination. There are currently some wayfinding signs in the Downtown, however, all wayfinding signs should be consistent throughout the Downtown, and incorporate a consistent design with a coordinated color palette to create a unique theme that is both easily recognizable and sensitive to context of the environment. Furthermore, the signage in the Downtown area should be coordinated with an overall comprehensive signage program for the City of Baldwin Park. The Metrolink Station is a key location where directional signage should be provided. It should direct motorists and pedestrians to the rest of Downtown, City Hall, the Arts and Recreation Center, the new Civic Plaza, Morgan Park, public facilities and public parking. 6. Public Art Public art can complement and enhance the Downtown Baldwin Park, and make positive contributions to the public's experience and understanding of life in the area. Arts and culture help to enrich city life, stimulate the local economy, enhance the urban environment, celebrate the natural environment, engage a wide spectrum of citizens and foster neighborhood pride. The arts can help express who we are as a community— historically, today and in the future. Art brings the community together, creating situations not merely for enjoyment and beauty, but also for dialogue, thought and growth. In Downtown Baldwin Park, the presence of the Arts and Recreation Center and Danzas I,ndigenas, the public art at the Baldwin Park Metrolink Station, provides a foundation for association of the Downtown with the arts. There are opportunities to encourage this evolving identity of the area by further integrating public art into the historic fabric and streetscape, such as in the new civic plaza and on key redevelopment sites. 36 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park Zoning and Development Standards A. Introduction This Chapter establishes the zones, use regulations, and development standards for the Downtown Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Specific Plan area. The zones with accompanying use regulations, development standards and design guidelines are intended to provide property owners, business owners, developers, and their designers with basic development and design criteria that are intended to reinforce the desired building and district character. This Specific Plan shall be used in conjunction with all other City of Baldwin Park relevant adopted plans and ordinances, including: • Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan • Baldwin Park Municipal Code Chapter 153 (Zoning Code) • Baldwin Park Design Guidelines Manual The City of Baldwin Park completed an update to its Zoning Code in 2012. A major focus of the Zoning Code Update was to incorporate Mixed Use zoning at appropriate locations to support the Mixed Use Land Use Designations identified in the 2020 General Plan. As such, a large portion of the Downtown area (approximately one- third) has been zoned Mixed Use (M'U-1), and this mixed use zoning is maintained in this Specific Plan. Downtown is the only location in the City with MU -1 zoning. The MU -1 zone is intended to create opportunities for development that integrate commercial and residential uses. This zoning will be conducive to creating projects that support transit and walkability. B. Specific Plan Zoning The Downtown TOD Specific Plan establishes zoning for parcels within the Specific Plan boundary as identified in Figure 4-1. The zones for the Specific Plan area are: • Mixed Use 1(MU-1) • Neighborhood Commercial (C-1) • General Commercial (C-2) Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 4 Zoning and Development Standards 37 • Industrial Commercial (I -C) • Single Family Residential (R-1) • Garden Multi -Family Residential (R -G) • Open Space (OS) The use regulations and development standards for the MU -1 zone are contained within Section C of this chapter. Additional specific regulations in the Zoning Code that apply to development in the MU -1 zone are identified in Tables 4-1 and 4-2. The C-1, C-2, I -C, R-1, R -G, and OS zones are subject to the provisions of the Zoning Code. In addition, Sections D through H of this chapter provide added provisions, exceptions, and development standards to further tailor these zones and development criteria to the unique aspects and conditions of the Downtown TOD Specific Plan area. Refer to Chapter 6 (Circulation and Parking) of this plan for parking requirements in the Downtown TOD Specific Plan area. Where general land use regulations and/or development standards of the Zoning Code are inconsistent with this Specific Plan, the standards and regulations of the Specific Plan shall prevail and supersede the applicable provisions of the Zoning Code. Any issue not specifically covered in the Specific Plan shall be subject to Chapter 153 (Zoning Code) of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code. The development regulations in this chapter are also supplemented by design criteria set forth in Chapter 5 (Design Standards and Guidelines) of this Specific Plan. C. Mixed Use 1 (MU -1) Zone 1. Intent and Purpose The Intent and purpose of the Mixed Use 1 (MU -1) zone is to provide development opportunities for integrated, complementary residential and commercial development on the same parcel or contiguous group of parcels. Development can be integrated vertically, with residential or office uses above retail uses, or horizontally on site. The MU -1 zone is established to create opportunities for development that integrates commercial and residential uses within the Downtown, with an emphasis on retail, service, entertainment, and restaurant business oriented toward street frontages, and medium- to high-density residential and professional office uses built to complement such uses. The MU -1 zone is intended to promote development and uses which are functionally integrated by location and types of structures, the efficient use of land, optimal site planning and various public and private realm design elements. When planning for new projects in Downtown, it will be important to preserve flexibility for land owners so they can respond to evolving market conditions. This is Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 4 Zoning and Development Standards 39 Now mixed-use and retail development should be targeted In the heart of Downtown, with pedestrian -oriented retail uses lining Ramona Boulevard and Maine Avenue. Vertical mixed use projects with housing or office above retail uses add to the desired vibrancy of the Downtown area. The Introduction of higher density housing, both market rate and workforce housing, proximate to the Metrolink station will faster greater pedestrian activity in this Downtown and provide easy access to trains rerving ampkryment centers throughout the Los Angeles anL San Bernardino county areas. Well-designed attached residential development can be part of a horizontal mixed use 9 '61-1-1111MA", = I AMY6111111SM fW 40 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park a significant benefit of having the mixed use zoning designation in a large portion of Downtown, which offers greater flexibility than single use zoning. In addition, new development projects should consider including flex spaces that can work as retail, office, or even live/work space, where feasible. This flexibility will allow land owners to maximize the value of their project and encourage ongoing economic development. 2. Use Regulations a) Permitted uses. Table 4-1 identifies the permitted uses in the MU -1 zone. b) Conditional uses. Certain uses maybe subject to special conditions regarding the location, operation or design of the use. References to these provisions are made in Table 4-1. c) Prohibited uses. If a use is not specifically listed in Table 4-1, that use is prohibited. However, the Zoning Administrator shall have the authority to determine whether the proposed use is permitted based on the findings that the use is similar to and no more detrimental than a particular use permitted In the zone. d) Specific Regulations. Certain uses are subject to specific regulations contained in the Baldwin Park Zoning Code and/or this Specific Plan. References to these provisions are made in Table 4-1. e) Mixed uses. Permitted uses identified in Table 4-1 may be established on a single site as an integrated project, subject to the provisions of this chapter. Along portions of streets designated as Active Retail Frontage (as defined in Figure 4-1), all new development is required to include a commercial component along the street edge. For other areas of the MU -1 zone, any combination of uses as permitted in Table 4-1 is allowed. f) Limitations on activities. The following activities shall not be permitted within any mixed use development: 1) Storage of flammable liquids or hazardous materials beyond that normally associated with a residential use. 2) Manufacturing or industrial activities, including but not limited to welding, machining, or any open flame work. 3) Any other activity or use as determined by the Zoning Administrator to not be compatible with residential activities and/or to have the possibility of affecting the health or safety of live/work unit residents due to the potential for the use to create dust, glare, heat, noise, noxious gases, odor, smoke, traffic, vibration or other impacts, or would be hazardous because of materials, processes, products, or wastes. 4) After approval, a mixed use building shall not be converted to entirely residential use. Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 4 Zoning and Development Standards 41 Table 4-1: Permitted and Conditionally Permitted Uses within Mixed Use 1(MU-1) Zone 42 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park Acupressure/Acupuncture Establishments �,.. ..... -......... Alcohol Sales ®,--- ........ -- Zoning Code 153.120 Part 2 a. On -Sale Outlets CUP b. Off -Sale Outlets _ ........ ........... CUP - .. ................. ,Antique Shops ......... P ...... ......... .................. �,..�,. , ..... ......... ......... Arcades and Internet Cafes ....... ,. CUP ...... ....... ....................... ---- m.. Zoning Code 153.120 Part 3 ........... - - ............. .............--- Art/Photography Stores, Studios, and Galleries -11 - — P -----,,,._. _..... - -11.v. ._.....-. _. _. Banks and Financial Institutions ....... ---- ._ CUP ......... r........ . ...... Business Support Services (blueprinting, comupter- — P ------ services, film processing, small equipment rental, etc.) ......... ......... ..... Catering Establishments P m,...�..e -. Commercial Entertainment (motion picture theaters, CUP performing arts centers, dance halls .... ..---------,--- .. ®� e, , ........ ------- Day Care Centers Child CUP .� ............. ... . .............. -_ Zoning Code 153.120 Part 6 Day Care Centers Adult CUP - ,,,,,,,... ® . Drive-through establishments ........ Drug Stores and Pharmacies P ......... ......_..._ . Dwelling Units a. Detached Single -Family Dwelling Units -- b. Multiple -Family Dwelling Units P c Live/work unit . ._ P Section C.S. of this Chapter ....... ... ®, , _ Educational Institutions ......... a. College, University, Professional CUP b. Elementary and Secondary (private) CUP c. Elementary and Secondary (public) P d. Vocational and Trade Schools CUP .......--- -----..... Food and Beverage Sales . ....... — - a. Grocery Stores (includes large, full-service markets) P b. Specialty Stores (deli, coffee, bakery, produce) P c. Convenience Stores P d. Liquor Stores CUP Zoning Code 153 120 Part 2 ......._ .. Game Machines - A - -- ..................... Zoning Code 153.0 Home Improvements Stores _ ,.__ CUP - --- .............-------- .._.0 .. , Home Occupations A _.. .... ........ ........ Zoning Code 153.120 Part 8; A home occupation permit must be obtained from the Business License _ — — ....- ........._. ......__. Department. ..... ......... ......... ...... Hotels and Motels .... .,...., CUP Zoning Code 153 120 Part 9 g — — ......�n..... Massage Establishments and Services ,,.. m .. ........... .......— �- —.... Zoning Code 153.120 Part 17 ...... Medical/Dental Offices CUP In Active Retal Frontage areas per Figure 4-1, only allowed on upper .....__ ....._.. m,m,m a ....... floors or behind retail frontage. _......_.. ................. Medical Marijuana Dispensaries �.. --_. ,�.,,..,, _ ........... ......................... ......... ....... ...... .........m................ Multi le Tenant Retail -Small P ----------- __..------ 42 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park Table 1(co nue ) Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 4 Zoning and Development Standards 43 Nightclubs CUP Nightclubs accessory to a permitted primary use are permitted in the MU - 1 zone, provided the permit for the primary use expressly identifies the nightclub as an accessory use. _.. . . .... m.._ ..... Off -Street Parking Facility ......... CUP _. a) Must be located within 300 ft of the primary use/parcel; b) Not permitted along Active Retail Frontage areas per Figure 4-1. .. Offices -... _ Business and Professional P In Active Retal Frontage areas per Figure 4-1, only allowed on upper floors or behind retail frontage. Open Space and Use ...Outdoor Storage a . ... _ A f this Chapter Section C 8 of Personal Services (barber shops, beauty salons/spas, P tailors, dry cleaning, self-service laundry, etc.) ...... ...... ......... ......... Pet Stores ......... CUP ...... Places of Assembly CUP In Active Retal Frontage areas per Figure 4-1, only allowed on upper �� ......___._ floors or behind retail frontage. ............. Recreatio'....... nal Facilities a. Health Clubs and Gymnasiums CUP b. Dance or Martial Arts Studios -- P - ......... . Residential Care Facilities CUP Restaurants a. Restaurants with no Alcohol Sales P b. Restaurants with Alcohol Sales ...... CUP Zoning Code 153.120 Part 2 ... . ------- ...... _,mP Retail Shops. -- __. Vehicle maintenance or repair_ (e.g., body or mechanical work, including boats and recreational vehicles), vehicle detailing and painting, upholstery, or any similar use ..... ......... ........e....... ....... . . . ......... Vending Machines a. Regular A Zoning Code 153.050.040 b. Reverse A .._..,_ ......— – . ,,,..,..._ Secondhand Stores _------ ....................... ......... Service stations -- P Permitted Use CUP Conditional use permit required A Accessory use – Use not allowed Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 4 Zoning and Development Standards 43 3. Development Provisions a) General. Table 4-2 Identifies the development standards applicable to all development in the MU -1 zone. Certain development standards may be subject to special conditions. These standards are provided here or where otherwise referenced. Table 4-2: Development Standards for Mixed Use 1(MU-1) Zone O., ,. . - Lot Area - Minimum 15,000 sf For newly created lots ..... .......... ......... Lot Depth Minimum — — ...... 1., ,...... 100 ft ........- ------- For newly created lots _ , „A...... _ Lot Width - Minimum 50 ft .................................. ----. For newly created lots -------- ---. Lot Coverage - Maximum_ 70% Front Yard Depth - Minimum 0 ft a) Zoning Code 153.130.030; 0; b) Section C.3.d. of this Chapter; c) Ground -floor residential uses shall have a minimum front yard depth of 1 . ...... .______ �. Side Yard Width - Minimum 0 ft a ZoningCode 153.130.030; b) Ground -floor residential uses shall' have a minimum side yard width of 10 ft; c) If adjacent to a residentially zoned lot, the minimum side yard width ® ®.. shall be 15 ft. ......... Rear Yard Depth - Minimum ......... 10 ft ... ....,. _ ......... ................. a) Zoning Code 153.130.030; b) If adjacent to a residentially zoned lot, the minimum rear yard depth ..... ....... ......... ...... ......... ------ shall be 15 ft; ....... ............... Common Open Space Area - Minimum Minimum 100 sf per unit Required for residential uses only, _ � � Minimum_ dimension shall be 20 ft. ' Private Open Space Area - Minimum Minimum 36 sf per unit Required for residential uses only; _ Minimum dimension shall be 6 ft. Commercial Only Development 1.5 Floor -Area -Ratio - Maximum for Mixed 2.0 Use Development ............... .......... --- — — —----- -- -------- Residential Density - Maximum 30 du/ac ....... ......... Section C.3.b of this Chapter — Building Height - Maximum ......... ....— - -- . 50 ft _ ..... ---------- Zoning Code 153.130.040 ......... . Residential Floor Areas - Minimum Efficiency 500 sf One Bedroom 700 sf Two Bedroom 900 sf Three Bedroom 1,100 sf Each Additional Bedroom 200 sf Live/work unit 750sf ISection C.6. of this Chapter 44 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park b) Additional Residential Density. A density bonus of up to 5 units per 1,000 square feet of public open space and up to 10 units per 2,000 square feet of public open space In the form of a courtyard or plaza within the development may be permitted, subject to the following requirements: Table 4.3: Residential Density Bonus for Community Benefits Public Open Space, subject to the following requirements: 5 units per 1,000 square feet of public 1) The open space area (courtyard or plaza) shall be a open space, and 10 units per 2,000 minimum of 1,000 square feet with a minimum square feet of public open space. dimension of 25 feet, and no more than 3 feet above the level of the street it adjoins. Larger open space areas may be split into two or more areas so as long as the minimum area and dimension are met. 2) Required setback and parking areas shall not count toward the open space calculation. 3) Required private and common open space for residential units may not be counted toward the open space calculation. 4) The open space area shall have direct access to a public street, which is open and unobstructed from the ground level to the sky. 5) The courtyard or plaza shall be landscaped and includes amenities such as seating, planters and pots, water features, etc. See also Chapter 5 (Design Standards and Guidelines) of this Specific Plan for standards and guidelines for plazas and courtyards. .. Public Art, subject to the following requirements: 5 units per acre. 1) The artwork is accessible to the public on the site of the development. 2) The artwork shall be an amount equal to one percent (1%) of the total building valuation, as defined in Ordinance 1245' (Art in Public Places Program), excluding land allocation and off-site improvements costs. 3) All requirements of Ordinance 1245 apply, excluding the allowance of full or partial in -lieu fees as an alternative to rovidin on-site art. Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 4 Zoning and Development Standards 45 c) Ground floor treatment for Active Retail Frontage. The following standards apply to ground floor uses along portions of streets designated as Active Retail Frontage (as defined in Figure 4-1) in the -MU -1 zone: 1) The ground -floor or street level frontage, excluding access to parking and entryways to upper level residential uses, shall be designed to accommodate retail, restaurant, or similar type of active use. No residential uses are permitted on the ground floor, except as noted herein. The Zoning Administrator may grant residential uses on the ground floor in an area designated as Active Retail Frontage if: • The project provides an additional public benefit or amenity, such as but not limited to a public paseo, public courtyard, etc. • The residential frontage of the project does not exceed 25% of the linear frontage of the total linear street frontage of the project site. For example, if a property in an area designated as active retail pedestrian frontage has a 200 foot frontage, no more than 50 feet may be used on ground floor residential uses. 2) For new construction, ground floor retail space shall be provided to a depth of at least 25 feet from the front fagade and shall include a minimum floor -to -ceiling height of 18 feet. This standard does not apply to the adaptive reuse of existing buildings. 3) On corner parcels, the nonresidential space shall turn (wrap around) the corner for a distance of not less than 25 feet. The termination of use shall occur at an architectural break in the building. d) Building transparency/windows and openings facing streets. Placement and orientation of doorways, windows, and landscape elements shall create strong, direct relationships with the street. Street -facing facades of all buildings shall Incorporate windows and openings providing light to adjacent spaces and rooms, and to create visual Interest and provide "eyes on the street." 1) Along portions of streets designated as Active Retail Frontage per Figure 4-1, the following regulations apply: • Windows and openings facing streets shall constitute a minimum of 75% of street -level building facades. • On upper -floors, windows and openings facing streets shall constitute a minimum of 40% of building facades for commercial uses, and 20% of building facades for residential uses. • Windows and openings shall provide clear and transparent view into the ground floor -uses or shall display merchandise to reinforce a pedestrian scale. Dark tinted, reflective or opaque glazing is not permitted for any required wall opening along street level facades. 46 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park • During hours of operation, open -wall storefronts, such as retractable doors or folding glass walls, are encouraged. 2) For all other areas of the MU -1 zone, the following regulations apply: • Windows and openings facing streets shall constitute a minimum of 50% of street -level building facades, with the exception of residential units with individual entries, in which case windows and openings facing streets shall constitute a minimum of 30% of street -level building facades. • On upper -floors, windows and openings facing streets shall constitute a minimum of 40 percent of building facades for commercial uses, and 20% of building facades for residential uses. • Residential units with individual entries should include windows on the ground floor that look out onto the street. e) Front yard depth. The front yard depth in the MU -1 zone shall be as required In Table 4-2 with the following exception: 1) For parcels fronting the north side of Ramona Avenue between Maine Avenue and Bogart Avenue, the minimum front yard depth shall range from 45 feet to 70 feet as identified in Figure 4-2, and subject to review by the Zoning Administrator. The purpose of this building setback is to provide space for future street improvements to match the existing right- of-way ight- ofway along the north side of Ramona Boulevard west of Maine Avenue and east of Bogart Avenue, consistent with the Ramona Boulevard cross section provided In Chapter 6 (Circulation and Parking) and as described in Chapter 3 (Urban Design Framework) of this plan. The required front yard area shall be landscaped and maintained pursuant to Subchapter 153.160 of the Baldwin Park Zoning Code. Figure 4-2: Front Yard Requirement for Parcels Fronting the North Side of Ramona Boulevard between Maine Avenue and Bogart Avenue Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 4 Zoning and Development Standards 47 f) Shared property lines with a residential zoned lot. 1) Wherever a mixed use zoned reversed corner lot shares a rear property line with a residential zoned lot and nonresidential uses are located within 15 feet of that rear property line, a minimum 15 -foot wide street side yard area shall be maintained. 2) Wherever a non-residential portion of a mixed use development shares a side or rear property line with a residentially zoned lot, a six-foot tall solid masonry wall shall be provided., along or adjacent to all such side and rear lot lines pursuant to §153.130.060 of the Baldwin Park Zoning Code. A minimum 2 -foot landscape buffer shall also be provided along the shared lot lines. 3) Wherever a mixed use zoned lot shares a rear or interior side property line with a single-family residential zoned lot, no portion of the building, including parapets, shall be above an imaginary plane drawn at the rear (or interior) property line and extended at an angle of 45 degrees towards the center of the property, as illustrated in Figure 4-3. .... _.- Height Limit ...... .... . Residential or Office Uses STREET (Note: Illustration is not to scale) Residential or Office Uses Residential or Office Uses Retail Uses — 45° IMAGINARY PLANE GOVERNS \,---- BUILDING MASSING "�"�w, r. rvsexrn rrrg Ir, rfxroi¢pia� dai lur.hng taW kudge;s, .. wolls, and '1`1iIiis ADJOINING RESIDENTIAL USES 4,5' "fix, 6 fx l rnlnimunr 15 fR:eW �' nui866num ar.^'!dm' when uamn &utody oda arenr to to idontia It uses 'Also applicable to interior side setback Figure i i t Adjacent to SingleFamily Residential Zone g) Pedestrian access. Pedestrian access from the public right-of-way shall be incorporated into all development within the MU -1 zone. The design of new projects shall promote walkability and connectivity to include design and orientation standards such as: 48 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park 1) A system of pedestrian walkways shall connect buildings on a site to each other, to on-site automobile and bicycle parking areas, and to any on-site open space areas and pedestrian amenities. 2) Lighting shall be incorporated along sidewalks or other pedestrian walkways to enhance the pedestrian environment and provide for public safety. Lighting shall be low mounted and downward casting in a manner that reduces light trespass onto adjacent properties. 3) Connections between on-site walkways and the public sidewalk shall be provided. An on-site walkway shall connect the primary building entry or entries to a public sidewalk on each street frontage. Such walkway shall be the shortest practical distance between the primary entry and sidewalk, generally no more than 125 percent of the straight line distance. h) Parking. The following applies to surface parking lots and parking structures. See also Chapter 5 of this plan for additional design standards and guidelines for parking structures. 1) Surface parking shall be located on the interior side or rear of the site to the greatest extent practicable. Surface parking between the sidewalk and buildings shall be prohibited. 2) Any parking structure with at least one floor of parking at grade or above, and which contains primary property frontage along a primary street, shall incorporate wrapped residential uses or retail businesses with shopping windows viewable from the sidewalk along the ground floor, or two or more of the following features: • display or shopping windows; • landscape material (e.g., foundation plantings, vertical trellis with vines, planter boxes with cascading landscape material) that results in the parking structure being adequately screened from adjoining parcels; • architectural detailing and articulation that provides texture on the facade or structure openings and effectively integrates the parking structure into the basic building design; and/or • artwork such as sculptures, murals, and mosaics. I) Building orientation and entrances. Street -facing primary entrances for nonresidential uses shall be unlocked and accessible to the public during business hours. Residential and nonresidential entries shall be clearly defined features of front facades, and of a scale that is in proportion to the size of the building and number of units being accessed. Larger buildings shall have a more prominent building entrance, while maintaining a pedestrian scale at the street level. Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 4 Zoning and Development Standards 49 j) Entrances. When nonresidential and residential uses are located in the same building, separate pedestrian entrances shall be provided for each use. The entrances for nonresidential uses shall be visually distinct from the entrances for the residential uses. k) Outdoor dining. Outdoor dining is permitted and encouraged in the MU -1 zone pursuant to the definitions and standards in Section C.6. of this chapter. 1) Walls and fences. All new mixed use developments that are located adjacent to the rail tracks shall provide a continuous security fence (or wall) along the common property line to prevent trespassing of the railroad right-of-way, to maintain resident safety, and to reduce train noise impacts on the users of the adjacent buildings. The fence shall be designed as follows: 1) The height of the fence (or wall) shall be a minimum of six feet and a maximum of eight feet. 2) The fence (or wall) shall be made of vandal -resistant materials, such as wrought iron, hedge screening, etc. 3) Landscaping such as dense shrubs and vines shall be planted along the fence (or wall) to soften its appearance. 4. Required Residential Open Space Maintaining open space areas provides recreational opportunities, allows sunlight to enter into living spaces and provides a spacious and Inviting feel. The minimum required open space areas for residential uses, as listed in Table 4-2, shall be maintained pursuant to these regulations. a) Residential open space. The following regulations applyto required residential open space areas within all mixed use zoned lots: 1) More than one open space area may be provided on a lot. The sum of square footages for all eligible open space areas on a lot shall comprise the total open space area for that lot. 2) Required side or rear yard areas may be included In the calculated open space area but a required front yard area may not. 3) All required open space shall be usable. Usable open space shall be improved to support residents' passive or active use. Such open space shall be located on the same parcel as the dwelling units for which it is required. The computation of such open space shall include no 50 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park obstructions other than devices and structures designed to enhance Its usability, such as swimming pools, fountains, planters, benches, and required landscaping. 4) open space areas shall have no parking, driveway or right-of-way encroachments. 5) Usable open space does not need to be located on the ground. Rooftop gardens and rooftop landscaping, including rooftops above parking structures, may be used to satisfy the open space requirement. b) Private Open Space Orientation. Private open space(s) attached to residential units shall be designed to avoid direct visibility into the interiors of adjacent units. 5. Standards for Live/Work Units A live/work unit Is defined as an integrated living unit and working space with an internal connection between the living and working space, occupied and utilized by a single housekeeping unit. Retail and/or wholesale sales and/or office businesses may be conducted in live/work units. The intent of this section is to provide for and make feasible the reuse of existing commercial or residential structures to accommodate live/work opportunities, as well as provide opportunities for new development of buildings specifically designed and constructed to provide live/work units. Live/work units may also occupy a portion of a building design for mixed use development. Live/work units shall be developed according to the following regulations. a) For live/work units in areas identified as Active Retail Frontage (Figure 4-1), the first 25 feet offloor area depth at the street level frontage shall be devoted to pedestrian -oriented retail activity. b) All living space within the live/work unit shall be contiguous with, and an Integral part of, the working space, with direct access between the two areas. c) At least one of the full-time workers of the live/work unit shall reside in the unit. The residential area shall not be rented separately from the working space. The business activity occupying the Ilve/work unit may have employees In addition to residents as necessary. d) Access to individual units shall be from common access areas, corridors or hallways. . . . ........... ................................................. Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 4 Zoning and Development Standards 51 e) Complete kitchen space and sanitary facilities shall be provided in compliance with all applicable codes. f) The workspace shall not occupy more than 40% of the unit. g) All work activities and workspace shall be limited to the first floor. h) Retail space may be integrated with working space. A business license shall be obtained in compliance with the Baldwin Park Municipal Code for business activities conducted within the live/work unit. J) Signage shall be a maximum of three (3) square feet; illumination is prohibited. k) After approval, a live/work unit shall not be converted to entirely residential use. 6. Standards for Outdoor Dining Outdoor dining is encouraged in the MU -1 zone and may be provided either in private patios or within the public sidewalk right-of-way. These two kinds of outdoor dining areas are defined as follows: "Patio dining space"' is an area adjacent to a street (or alley) level eating or drinking establishment, located within private property line and is used exclu- sively for dining, drinking and circulation therein. This space may be open or covered with temporary structures such as trellises, umbrellas or permanent structures such as overhangs and upper floors of the building. "Sidewalk dining space" is an area adjacent to a street level eating or drinking establishment, located within the sidewalk area of the public right-of-way and Is used exclusively for dining, drinking and circulation therein. A physical bar- rier, such a bollards, planter boxes or pots, umbrellas, etc., should separate the dining area from the remainder of the sidewalk and be in place during hours of operation defines the area. Sidewalk dining may be provided with either self- service or waiter/waitress service. The following standards and guidelines apply to outdoor (sidewalk and patio) dining spaces. See Figure 4-4 for a typical layout of a sidewalk dining space. a) Sidewalk dining locations. Sidewalk dining shall be permitted within the public sidewalk rights-of-way in the MU -1 zone subject to the clear widths available. 52 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park b) Patio dining locations. Patio dining shall be permitted within private property adjacent to the streets or public Outdoor patio dining allowed within the street yard setback. c) Adjacency to buildings. Sidewalk dining within the public sidewalk rights -of - be Y w:. a immediately adjacentto the buildingswith the pedestrian path immediatelyalong YMaintenanceofclear passage.Sidewalkdiningpublic rights-of-way shall maintain a clear pathway for pedestrians, free from all obstructions, of not less than 7 feet depending on the exact sidewalk widthandextentof pedestrian activity in the streetscape segment, A clear passage of 10feet In width preferred. For purposes of pathway dimension, count as obstructions. The Zoning Administrator shall define exact clear pathway requirements within this range, on a case-by-case basis. The Zoning Administrator ..,. + 1 9 9the minimum requirementsbased on the particular conditions. e) Demarcation of sidewalk dining areas. The sidewalk dining area adjacent to the building shall be demarcated by barriers such as railings, fencing, or combination of or Y landscaping In planter boxes, or movable bollards. No solid walls shall be allowed. All the outdoor barriers Baldwin Parles dirnate I well suited for outdoor dining the year. The provision of ouWoor dining14 the Downtown will add Interest, "Ity and contribute to the pedestrian Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 4 Zoning and Development Standards 53 H Or C) "OCX4, PROPIM ME Fm PLAN Sam I" is Ie) SECTIONAL VIEW %� !: Figure 4-4: 'typical layout of Outdoor Dining Spaces 54 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park shall be movable and removed from the sidewalk at the close of the business establishment daily. Some discretion in terms of pots and planters placed directly adjacent to the building farrade shall be allowed. f) Demarcation of patio dining spaces. The patio dining spaces adjacent to streets or alley walkways shall be demarcated by either temporary or permanent boundary definers such as railings, fencing, or a combination of railings or fencing, and landscaping in planter boxes, or movable bollards. g) Outdoor dining within arcades along sidewalk rights-of-way or alley walkways. The provision of a dining space in a covered arcade that is open to the sidewalk is permitted as long as the architectural Integrity of the fagade Is maintained in conformance with the requirements in Chapter 5 (Design Standards and Guidelines) of this plan. h) Windows or doors to outdoor dining along sidewalk rights-of-way or alley walkways. The provision of windows and doors from indoor dining areas that open to the sidewalk or alley walkway is permitted and encouraged as long as the architectural integrity of the facade is maintained in conformance with the other sections of this chapter and the requirements in Chapter 5 (Design Standards and Guidelines) of this plan, and the open doors and windows do not obstruct the pedestrian right-of-way. I) Parking Requirements. The area used for sidewalk dining shall not be included in the eating or drinking establishment's area for the purposes of calculating the establishment's parking requirement. The area used for patio dining shall be included in the eating or drinking establishment's area for the purposes of calculating the establishment's parking requirement. j) Materials. The style and materials of the barriers that demarcate the outdoor dining space should be compatible in color and finish with the adjacent structure and approved by City Staff. k) Hours of operation. The outdoor dining space hours of operation shall be limited to the hours of operation of the associated dining establishment. 1) Display of outdoor menu display. A single -sided framed menu attached to a moveable barrier that defines the sidewalk or patio dining space is permitted within the sidewalk and patio dining spaces. The size of the frame shall not exceed three square feet. Freestanding pedestal menus or A -frame displays are prohibited. m) Maintenance of outdoor dining furniture. Outdoor dining furniture shall be maintained to be safe, sanitary and attractive at all times. Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 4 Zoning and Development Standards 55 n) Conformance to ADA and Title 24 requirements. All outdoor dining areas shall conform to federal and state requirements as per the Americans with Disability Act and California Title 24 Accessibility Guidelines. All other requirements per the City Public Works and Building and Safety Departments shall also be addressed. o) Permit Requirements. An Encroachment Permit is required for all sidewalk dining areas. The City may also require additional liability insurance. Please see the Community Development Department for details on how to apply. 7. Additional Development Standards for Mixed Use Developments This section provides additional development standards for mixed use developments. The primary intent of these standards and criteria is to balance the needs of nonresidential uses for access, visibility, parking, loading, safety, and economic development with the needs of residential uses for privacy, security, and relative quiet. a) Loading and unloading activities of mixed use developments. Where applicable, the covenants, conditions, and restrictions of a mixed use development shall indicate the times when the loading and unloading of goods may occur on the street, provided that in no event shall loading or unloading take place after 10:00 P.M. or before 7:00 AN on any day of the week. b) Lighting standards for mixed use developments. Lighting for nonresidential uses shall be appropriately designed, located, and shielded to ensure that they do not negatively impact the residential uses in the development or any adjacent residential uses. c) Recycling and refuse storage facilities standards for mixed use developments. Recycling and refuse storage facilities for nonresidential uses shalt be located as far as possible from residential units and shall be completely screened from view from the residential portion of the development. Recycling and refuse storage facilities for nonresidential uses shall be compatible in architectural design and details with the overall project. The location and design of trash enclosures shall mitigate nuisances from odors when residential uses might be impacted. Trash areas for food service and sales uses, when occupying the same building as residential uses, shall be refrigerated to control the odor. d) Residential noise notice. Residents of new mixed use development projects in the MU -1 zone, whether owners or tenants, shall be notified in writing before taking up residence that they will be living in an urban -type environment and that the noise levels may be higher than a strictly residential area. The covenants, conditions, and restrictions of a residential or mixed use project 56 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park shall require that prospective residents acknowledge the receipt of the written noise notification. Signatures shall confirm receipt and understanding of this information. 8. Outdoor Storage and Uses a) Uses Restricted to Indoors. Unless otherwise indicated in this Chapter, all uses listed in Table 4-1 must be conducted to wholly within an enclosed building. The following uses or businesses are exceptions to this rule: 1) Outdoor dining and food service in conjunction with a cafeteria, cafd, restaurant or similar establishment. 2) Newspaper stalls. 3) Other sales and display areas as approved through a conditional use permit or similar discretionary permit. 4) Other uses as approved by the Zoning Administrator through the Zoning Code Interpretation process pursuant to Subchapter 153.210 of the Baldwin Park Zoning Code. b) Outdoor storage materials. Outdoor storage of materials shall be limited to the accessory storage of goods sold or utilized by the principal use of the lot where permitted by Table 4-1. No outdoor storage is permitted In the front or side yard. All materials shall be entirely screened from view from public right- of-way by a 6 -foot tall solid fence or masonry wall. c) Outdoor storage areas. Any areas developed and/or used for outdoor storage and use shall comply with the most current National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permits Implementation of Best Managements Practices (BMP) and maintenance of those BMP's. d) Outdoor sale and display location. No outdoor sale or display area shall occupy any required parking space or required yard areas. 9. Other Applicable Zoning Regulations In addition to the requirements contained in this chapter of the Specific Plan, regulations contained in the following Subchapters of this Baldwin Park Zoning Code may apply to development in the MU -1 zone: 153.110 Specific Plan Zone 153.120 Standards for Specific Land Uses and Activities Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 4 Zoning and Development Standards 57 153.130 Site Planning and General Development Standards 153.140 Performance Standards 153.150 Off -Street Parking and Loading 153.160 Landscaping Standards 153.170 Sign Regulations 153.180 Antennas and Other Telecommunications Facilities 153.200 Nonconforming Lots, Structures and Uses 153.210 Administrative Procedures See also Chapter 6 (Circulation and Parking) of this Specific Plan for parking requirements in the Specific Plan area. In addition, refer to Chapter 5 of this plan for additional site planning and architectural guidelines for mixed use developments. D. Neighborhood Commercial (C-1) Zone Per Subchapter 153.050 of the Baldwin Park Zoning Code, the intent and purpose of the Neighborhood Commercial (C-1) zone is as follows: The C-1 zone provides areas for the development and protection of neigh- borhood -scale, low -intensity retail and service commercial uses that provide conveniences to neighborhood residences. 1. Development Provisions The development provisions for the C-1 zone contained in Subchapter 153.050 (Commercial and Industrial Zones) of the Baldwin Park Zoning Code apply to all development in the C-1 zone in the Downtown TOD Specific Plan area. In addition, refer to Chapter 6 of this plan for parking requirements, and to the City of Baldwin Park Design Guidelines Manual for additional site planning and architectural guidelines for neighborhood commercial uses. E. General Commercial (C-2) Zone Per Subchapter 153.050 of the Baldwin Park Zoning Code, the intent and purpose of the General Commercial (C-2) zone is as follows: The C-2 zone provides areas for the development of a broad range of retail, service and entertainment designed to meet the shopping and service needs of the local residential and business communities. 58 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park 1. Development Provisions The development provisions far the C-2 zone contained In Subchapter1' (Commerciale industrial Zones)of a Park Zoningas sa to all development in the C-2 zone In the Downtown TOD Specific Plan area, with the following additions a exceptions: Urnitations on use. The followingnot be a,eezone: 1) Vehicle maintenance or repair (e.g., body or mechanical work, Induding boats a recreationaldetainng and painting, upholstery, or iy similar use. Automotive Boat or M comerThe �.. ye l properties on i Boulevard and Bal"n park Boutmrd, two of busiest artatials, are ldealli� PNM&Ud at y a_Downtown. The OWS 1120, location, and vlWbflkv are h4O* valww by "ft" tanafft. 11ladeveloping from a MO mg n cerftr i and regional shoppem Lifestyle centers usually require z ameotles f4W shoppers Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 4 Zoning and Development Standards 59 4) Drive-through establishments. 5) Mortuaries. 6) Service stations. In addition, refer to Chapter 6 of this plan for parking requirements, and to the City of Baldwin Park Design Guidelines Manual for additional site planning and architectural guidelines for general commercial uses. F. Industrial Commercial (I -C) Zone Per Subchapter 153.050 of the Baldwin Park Zoning Code, the intent and purpose of the Industrial Commercial (I -C) zone is as follows: The I-Czone provides areas for the development of industrial parks, office com- plexes and light manufacturing businesses. 1. Development Provisions The development provisions for the I -C zone contained in Subchapter 153.050 (Commercial and Industrial Zones) of the Baldwin Park Zoning Code apply to all development In the I -C zone in the Downtown TOD Specific Plan area, with the following additions and exceptions: a) Limitations on use. The following uses shall not be permitted in the I -C zone: 1) Drive-through establishments. 2) Mortuaries. In addition, refer to Chapter 6 of this plan for parking requirements, and to the City of Baldwin Park Design Guidelines Manual for additional site planning and architectural guidelines for industrial uses. G. Garden Multi -Family Residential (R -G) Zone Per Subchapter 153.040 of the Baldwin Park Zoning Code, the intent and purpose of the Garden Multi --Family Residential.(R-G) zone Is as follows: The R -G zone provides an environment suitable for both small -lot detached or at- tached ttached dwelling units where more than one unit may be built on a /at The Intent Is to promote desirable characteristics for medium -density neighborhoods. 60 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park 1. Development Provisions The development provisions for the R -G zone contained in Subchapter 153.040 (Residential Zones) of the Baldwin Park Zoning Code apply to all development in the R -G zone in the Downtown TOD Specific Plan area, with the following additions and exceptions: a) Front Yard Setback - Minimum. The minimum front yard setback In the R -G zone shall be as follows: 1) General —10 feet. 2) Lot with aside entrygarage —10 feet. 3) Lot adjacent to R-1-7,500 or R-1 zone — 20 feet. In addition, refer to Chapter 6 of this plan for parking requirements, and to the City of Baldwin Park Design Guidelines Manual for additional site planning and architectural guidelines for small lot single family and multi -family residential uses. H. Open Space (OS) Zone Per Subchapter 153.060 of the Baldwin Park Zoning Code, the Intent and purpose of the Open Space zone is as follows: The Open Space zone is established to maintain open space areas In the City for recreational opportunities and to prevent Incompatible development in areas that should be preserved or regulated for scenic, recreational, conserva- tion, aesthetic, or health and safety purposes. 1. Development Provisions developmentThe provisions e Open Space■ ■ in Subchapter in the Open w Downtown !Specific Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 5 Design Standards and Guidelines 61 62 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park Design Standards and Guidelines A. Introduction This chapter provides standards and guidelines for designing mixed-use developments in the Mixed Use 1 (MU -1) zone, as well as exterior alterations and additions to existing mixed-use developments. The purpose of these standards and guidelines is to facilitate high-quality development within the Downtown. Mixed-use development integrates complementary residential and commercial development on the same parcel or contiguous group of parcels. Development can be integrated vertically, with residential or office uses above retail uses, or horizontally on the site. It provides opportunities to weave residential and public uses into the commercial fabric to create an active street life and enhance the vitality of businesses. These standards and guidelines applyto all mixed-use developments, and are in addition to the development standards set forth in Chapter 4 of this plan and other applicable regulations in the Baldwin Park Zoning Code. These standards and guidelines replace the design guidelines for mixed use development in Chapter 6 (Mixed Use) of the City of Baldwin Park Design Guidelines Manual (adopted 2012). For design guidelines for stand-alone multi -family residential, commercial and industrial developments in the Downtown, refer to the citywide Design Guidelines Manual. The following projects are subject to Design Review by the Design Review Committee in accordance with Chapter 153.210 of the Zoning Code: • Construction of a new mixed-use building or development. • Addition or exterior alteration to an existing mixed-use building or development. Design evaluation shall be based on substantial compliance with the intent and guidelines set forth in this chapter, and projects shall be approved, conditionally approved or denied on such basis. These design standards and guidelines are intended to provide property owners and their designers with basic design criteria that are intended to reinforce the desired Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 5 Design Standards and Guidelines 63 In MU -1 zone, human - scaled, pedestrian - friendly retail frontages that activate the street are appropriate. building and Downtown character. The guidelines have been established in order to accomplish the following goals: • Facilitate the development of well-designed buildings, or group of buildings, that integrate residences, neighborhood -serving businesses, and public uses. • Promote design creativity and variation while ensuring consistency in building scale, proportion and pedestrian orientation. • Contribute to the neighborhood character by respecting the scale, proportion and architectural style of the surrounding area. • Create visual interest in mixed-use buildings, while maintaining a sense of harmony within the project. • Eliminate random development patterns and establish site planning and design relationships between new development and neighboring properties. • Encourage environmental sensitivity in development. • Preserve and Incorporate structures into the project that are distinctive because of their age, cultural significance, or unique archltectural style. 64 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park B. Site Design Standards and Guidelines Mixed-use development fosters pedestrian -oriented environments by providing a mixture of uses in compact, walkable areas. The site planning guidelines focus on elements that contribute to a successful pedestrian -oriented environment, such as a continuous street frontage, ample pedestrian connections, and ground -floor design features that provide a visual link to the street and sidewalk. 1. Building Siting, Orientation and Setbacks a) Building siting should take into consideration the context of the mixed-use area, the location of nearby uses, and the location of major traffic generators, as well as the site's characteristics. The arrangement of structures, parking and circulation areas, and open spaces should relate to the surrounding built environment in pattern, function, scale, and character. b) The placement and design of buildings should facilitate and encourage pedestrian activity and convey a visual link to the street and sidewalks. c) Where feasible, buildings should be located adjacent to the sidewalk at the front property line (zero -foot setback). In such cases, when dedicated to public uses, a portion of the front building elevation may be set back to allow for outdoor use, such as outdoor patio dining, display, public art, entry forecourts, or other amenities appropriate to an urban development. d) Where feasible, buildings should be sited so that they screen parking and unsightly scenes and activitiesfrom publicview, residentially zoned properties, and the residential portion of a mixed-use project. e) The primary presence along the street frontage should be the building, not parking or loading areas. New buildings should be sited with the facades facing the public street in a manner that enhances pedestrian connections to outdoor pedestrian spaces such as courtyards, paseos, plazas and porticos. f) Buildings should not turn a blank wall to neighboring properties; site buildings to avoid visible blank walls along interior side property lines. g) The building(s) and main entrance(s) should be oriented toward the primary street frontage. Secondary entrances may be provided from the rear and/or parking areas. Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 5 Design Standards and Guidelines 65 This massing model Illustrates one way a horizontal mixed use project could be developed on the southwest comer of Maine Avenue and Clark Street under the development standards and design guidelines In this Specific Plan, 00 which orient pedestrian friendly retail use towards the street, with parking and the residential component towards the back of the site adjacent to the residential neighborhood. The placement and design of buildings should facilitate pedestrian activity and convey a visual link to the street, sidewalks, and plazas. Where feasible, buildings 01 should be sited so that they screen parking and loading areas from public view and from the residential portion of mixed use projects. Create gathering spaces Locate parking in the Provide common outdoor with outdoor amenities back of the retail uses spaces for residential uses Setback portions of the ProWde Tween'wallorbuiscoped Seperate vehicular entrances for building to accommodate commercial commercial and residential portions outdoor dining andresidaVU of the project 66 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park 2. Vehicle Circulation and Access a) Separate site access and parking facilities should be provided for residential uses and commercial uses. b) Site access and internal circulation shall promote safety, efficiency and convenience. Vehicular traffic shall be adequately separated from pedestrian circulation. Vehicular entrances shall be clearly identified and easily accessible to minimize pedestrian/vehicle conflict. c) The number of site access points or driveway aprons shall be minimized for aesthetic purposes, to achieve efficient and productive use of paved access ways, and to eliminate traffic and pedestrian hazards. They should be located as far as possible from street intersections, and should be coordinated with existing or planned median openings and driveways on the opposite side of the roadway. d) For the commercial portion of a mixed-use development, design that allows for present orfuture reciprocal access with adjacent properties Is encouraged. e) The main entry driveway should be easily identifiable, incorporating landscaping and possibly accent paving that is related to the building hierarchy and color. 3. Parking Lots a) Parking lots should be designed with a clear hierarchy of circulation: major access drives with no direct access to parking spaces; major circulation drives with little or no parking; and parking aisles for direct access to parking spaces. Loading and service areas should be provided with separate access and circulation whenever possible. b) No parking shah be permitted in a required front or street side yard setback area (as established by the Zoning Code). c) The internal circulation of parking areas shall be self-contained and designed so that no vehicle has to back into the public street or alley, or use the public street or alley to get from one parking aisle to another parking aisle. Provide end -stall turnarounds or a continuous circulation pattern. d) Parking lots should be separated from buildings by a raised walkway (minimum 4 feet wide) and landscape strip (minimum 7 feet wide). Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 5 Design Standards and Guidelines 67 e) Parking areas should provide bicycle racks that are located close to the buildings and do not impede pedestrian or auto circulation. Whenever possible, bicycle areas should be covered and located in areas which are clearly visible to site users in order to promote security. The design and materials should be coordinated with the site and building design. See also Subchapter 153.190 (Trip Reduction and Transportation Demand Management) of the Zoning Code for standards for bicycle parking in non-residential development. 4. Parking Structures a) Where feasible and compatible with the design of the building, use subterranean, semi -subterranean, or parking that is tucked under the building structure. Parking designed in this manner must effectively reduce the visual impact of parking; and not detract from the building architecture or site views. b) Access to parking structures should be designed so as not to obstruct free flow of traffic on adjoining public streets (e.g., right and left turn lanes into the structure when feasible). Entrances and exits should be located so that each is separate from the other to reduce turning movement conflicts as vehicles enter and exit the structure. c) There should be adequate ingress and egress to all parking spaces to ensure ease of mobility, ample maneuvering clearance, and safety of pedestrians and vehicles. Access points to the parking structure for pedestrians should be located to avoid pedestrian/vehicle conflicts. d) The height and mass of the parking structure should be consistent with the urban design fabric within which the structure is to be located. e) The exterior design of a structure should minimize its visual identity as parking by disrupting the monotony of its underlying structure system by providing window openings and through variations in color, material, and texture. In addition, the exterior facade should maintain a horizontal line throughout. The sloping nature of the interior structure should not be repeated on the exterior facade. f) A wall or other screening of sufficient height to screen parking vehicles and which exhibits a visually pleasing character should be provided. g) Design stair and elevator shafts to be distinct taller masses that Intersect the mass of the main structure. 68 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park h) Where p', pedestrian adjoin, the exteriorQ parkingthe II d exhibitlevel ofarchitecturaldetail decorativeas p overheadtrifilses, tree canopy, planter/seat pedestrian -scaled .lighting,public Athe applicationofmaterials and textures that establishcomfortable human scale. Ground -level istrongly encouraged Alenhancestreetscape i pedestrian + Elevators o.M be located along exterior periphery Y building, preferably B 6 and oriented 1 Mrthat the elevator lobby is visible from eet at The back ofthe elevatorcaband shaft should be made 9 or otherwallowill survelfiance kthe exterior Slynnarty, stairways should be located along the exterior periphery of the building,, preferabty an the street side and oriented so that the stairway Is visible from the street, at each level. Glen or other similar transparent material should be used 9 allow1 k) A higher level of improves securityparking structuresn e be designed to provide high light levels so that darl, hiding places are notcoloreda upper also recommended to Increase light. Extra lighting should be tl l 6' p in Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 5 Design Standards and Guidelines 69 pedestrian areas such as stairs, elevator lobbies, entrances, exits and ramps. Lamps shall emit a warm tone in the color range of 3,000 degrees Kelvin. 1) Strive to eliminate glare and visibility of pole mounted light fixtures on upper decks of parking structures by employing full cutoff fixtures and minimizing poles heights. Lights should be limited to 16 feet and be located between internal parking rows rather than at the structure's perimeter. S. Interface between Residential and Non -Residential Uses a) To provide privacy for and avoid significant shading of adjacent residential properties, the building massing of non-residential buildings shall be set away from the residential uses. At residential edges, non-residential buildings should maintain low profiles, and building heights shall be stepped down to the height of adjacent residential uses, utilizing architectural elements such as gables or hip roofs to reduce building mass. b) Whenever adjacent residential and commercial uses can mutually benefit from connection rather than separation, appropriate connective elements such as walkways, common landscaped areas, building orientation, gates and/or unfenced property lines should be employed. c) Landscaping shall be used to aid in privacy screening and as a buffer for residential development. Screening may consist of one (or more) of the following: • "Vertical" trees closely spaced, • "Green" (vine -covered) solid or fenced walls, and • Hedges Eighty (80) percent of the screen (wall, hedge, fence, etc.) at the property line shall be opaque. d) Noise or odor -generating activities in general, and loading areas, trash and storage areas, and rooftop equipment In particular, should be located as far as possible from adjacent residential uses and not be located next to residential properties without fully mitigating their negative visual, noise and odor Impacts. See also Subchapter 153.040 (Performance Standards) of the Zoning Code for performance standards related to noise, odor, light and glare, etc. 6. Plazas and Courtyards a) The commercial component of mixed-use developments should incorporate plazas and courtyards into their design. Buildings should be clustered to create usable pedestrian areas. 70 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park b) Primary access to public plazas and courtyards shall be provided from the street. Secondary access may be provided from retail shops, restaurants, offices and other uses within the development, Entries to the plazas and courtyards should be inviting and well lighted. c) Landscaping, water features, and public art should be incorporated into plaza and courtyard design. Shade trees or architectural elements that provide shelter and relief from direct sunlight should be provided. Water features should use recycled water only. d) Plazas and courtyards should be buffered from the street, parking areas and drive aisles. 7. Residential Open Space Common 6shall be ! 4the residential pardon of e development, M' ,. andsecure fromnon-residential component, a:clearly marked for N only. Commonopen Y5 containarea's shall 9 appropriate Mtheproject's poolspas, recreationbtflidings are encouraged for largerprojects, b and gazebos may be more appropriate for smaller projects. Children's play areas shall besited to I'visible9 ' ii•visibleB public right-of-way, Plazas, courtyards, and pedestrian areas function as "oases' or outdoor rooms In mixed use and commercial developments. Decorative site amenities, such as seating, planters and pots, fountains, or water features are critical design components for creating a pleasant pedestrian -oriented environment. Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 5 Design Standards and Guidelines 71 Walkways, arcades, and pergolas provide shade, connections and define usable space. b) Private useable open space shall be contiguous to the residential unit served and screened from public view for privacy. All balconies and patios that front a public street shall be substantially enclosed for screening and privacy. Private open space areas that are Intended for use by residents only should not be accessible from the commercial portion of the mixed-use development. c) In the MU -1 zone, accessible rooftop open space may be used as common useable open space by the residents. It may also be used for private useable open space, when the space Is directly accessible from the unit(s), provided It meets the residential open space requirements Chapter 4 of this Specific Plan. 8. Pedestrian Walkways a) Mixed-use developments shall be oriented and designed to enhance pedestrian movement within the development and to adjacent uses. b) Attractively landscaped, shaded and welt -marked pedestrian links between parking areas and buildings shall be provided. Pedestrian walkways shall also be provided' to link dwelling units with commercial uses in the mixed-use development, as well as with common open space, plazas and courtyards, and public sidewalks. c) Where pedestrian paths or walkways cross parking areas or driveways, decorative paving or some other method shall be used to define the pedestrian space and delineate crossings. d) Pedestrian connections should include design cues to help demarcate the transition between public and private spaces. Design cues may include a change In colors, materials, landscaping, or the dimensions of the walkway. 72 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park 9. Site Amenities a) Site amenities within a commercial setting should be coordinated in terms of color, materials and design in order to convey a cohesive project appearance and distinctive character. b) Seating should be included In plaza and courtyard design. Where possible, seating should be provided in active and passive areas. c) Tree grates should be provided along street edges and plazas where a continuous walking surface is needed. Grates should be a minimum of 4 feet in diameter. Knockouts must be provided to enlarge the inside diameterto support a larger tree trunk as the tree grows. d) Tree guards should be provided to protect trees in high activity areas. Tree guard design should be compatible with other site furnishings. Tree guards should be attached to the tree grate; welds should not be visible. e) Planters and pots should not obstruct pedestrian traffic flow. Consider placing pots in building recesses, at locations where access is discouraged and adjacent to blank walls to provide visual interest and color accents. Group similar sized planters in clusters to enrich streetscapes and plazas. Planter Site amenities, Including seating, planters and pots, twee grates, and fountains or water features, should convey a cohesive appearance In commercial settings. Public Review Draft- December 2014 Chapter 5 Design Standards and Guidelines 73 materials should complement the project architecture. Use of cast stone and masonry is encouraged provided it is consistent with the project design. f) Bollard design should be consistent with the overall project theme and should coordinate with other site furnishings. In locations where emergency access may be necessary, removable bollards should be considered. g) Trash receptacle design should coordinate with other streetscape furnishings. h) Bicycle rack design should be consistent with other streetscape furnishings. Use of "loop racks" and "ribbon bars" are encouraged. Newspaper racks should be consolidated. Newspaper rack locations should not inhibit pedestrian flow. Newspaper rack design should incorporate masonry and/or metal elements that compliment other streetscape furnishings. j) Site directories should be provided near vehicular and pedestrian entrances to multi -tenant commercial developments. Directory siting should maximize their visibility while minimizing the potential for creating a traffic hazard. 10. Fences, Walls and Hedges a) Walls and fences serve a major function in the streetscape and are used to screen vehicles, loading and storage areas, and utility structures. However, if not required for a specific screening or security purpose, they should not be utilized. The intent is to keep the walls as low as possible while performing their screening and security functions. b) Walls and fences should be planned and designed as integral parts of the development, and should be consistent with the landscaping and building design. c) If street fencing is necessary, decorative types of view fencing, such as wrought iron, are encouraged. Solid fencing, such as stucco or masonry, is strongly discouraged when they will block the view of the buildings or provide hiding places. The use of chain-link, barbed wire or razor wire for fencing is prohibited. d) Perimeter walls or fencing that do not front a public street should be of decorative masonry (split -face block, plaster/stucco finish), decorative metal (wrought iron), wood, hedges, or a combination of materials. They should be designed in a style, material and color to complement the development. Both sides of walls should be architecturally treated. 74 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park e) Tiered planting should be provided adjacent to project perimeter walls along street frontages to soften their appearance. f) Walls should be eliminated or sited to provide additional setback areas at project entries to accommodate landscaping, signage, or street furniture. g) Gates or comparable design solutions should be provided in perimeter walls or fences to allow emergency access and facilitate convenient pedestrian access. h) Walls should be curved or angled at comer locations along street frontagesto allow sight line views around the corner. i) Hedges and other landscape screening materials should consist of evergreen plant materials and should be drought tolerant. j) Freestanding walls, fences or hedges between any street frontage and retail building on site are not permitted. 11. Exterior Lighting a) In general, the location and amount of lighting should respond to the anticipated use and not exceed the amount illumination required by users. Lighting should be located to minimize its impact upon adjacent buildings and properties. b) Parking lot lighting and building security lighting for commercial uses should be appropriately shielded so as not to spill over into or otherwise adversely impact the residential portion of a mixed-use development or neighboring residential projects. c) Refer to Chapter 4 (Commercial) of the citywide Design Guidelines Manual for additional guidelines on exterior lighting. 12. Loading Areas a) All loading areas for commercial uses shall be located so as to be convenient to the commercial users and where associated odors and noise will not adversely Impact the residential units In a mixed-use project, or adjacent residential uses. b) Refer to Chapter 4 (Commercial) of the citywide Design Guidelines Manual for additional guidelines on loading areas. Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 5 Design Standards and Guidelines 75 13. Outdoor Storage and Service Areas a) All outdoor storage and service areas for commercial uses shall be located so as to be convenient to the commercial users and where associated odors and noise will not adversely impact the residential units in a mixed-use project, or adjacent residential uses. b) Outdoor storage and service areas shall not be visible from public right- of-ways and shall be screened from on-site and off-site public view with a combination of building features, decorative walls and landscaping consistent with the architectural style of the building. c) Refer to Chapter 4 (Commercial) of the citywide Design Guidelines Manual for additional guidelines on outdoor service and storage areas. 14. Refuse and Recyclables Collection Facilities a) Separate refuse collection facilities shall be provided and maintained for the residential units in a mixed-use development from those for the commercial uses. It shall be clearly marked for residential use only. b) All refuse collection facilities for commercial uses shall be located so as to be convenient to the commercial users and where associated odors and noise will not adversely impact the residential uses. c) Refuse and recyclable collection facilities shall not be visible from public right- of-ways and shall be screened from on-site and off-site public view with a combination of building features, decorative walls and landscaping consistent with the architectural style of the building. d) Refer to Chapter 4 (Commercial) of the citywide Design Guidelines Manual for additional guidelines on refuse collection facilities. 15. Utility and Mechanical Equipment Refer to Chapter 4 (Commercial) of the citywide Design Guidelines Manual for guidelines on utility and mechanical equipment. 76 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park C. Architectural Design Standards and Guidelines Mixed-use buildings should display unique, visually attractive qualities while having a unified composition. New buildings or building additions and renovations should not only harmonize with the prevailing characteristics of the surrounding area, but should be designed in response to individual site conditions, and to enhance the overall im- age of Downtown by virtue of the quality of design and construction. New projects should meet or exceed the standards of quality that have been set by surrounding development and contribute to the improvement of the area. All new development should be designed to improve the reality and perception of pedestrian safety and security with elements such as easily identifiable entrances, retail win- dows, pedestrian -scaled building massing and unique architectural features. Addi- tions and renovation should be compatible with the existing building in scale, materi- als, and design. 1. Building Organization a) Vertically mixed-use buildings should be designed with commercial storefronts on the ground floor and residential units above. Mixed-use buildings should display unique, visually attractive qualities while having a unified composition. b) Aground -floor retail use shall have a minimum floor -to -ceiling height of 18 feet. 2. Architectural Style a) The architectural style and use of materials should be consistent throughout the entire mixed-use development. Differences in use of architectural details may occurwhere the intent is to differentiate between the residential and commercial scale and character of the structure(s). b) Where new buildings or additions are built immediately between existing buildings, the design of the new construction should acknowledge the existing buildings using architectural elements such as matching cornice lines, continuation of a colonnade, use of similar materials, and similar building proportions. c) Each project should possess an identifiable architectural theme and be of high-quality design and materials. High-quality, innovative and imaginative architecture Is encouraged. For remodels or additions, the theme should be true to the original intent and style of the building. d) Historic detailing on otherwise contemporary style buildings is strongly discouraged, such as using oversized (too large or out of scale) crown moldings or cornices to make a 1950s building appear "Mission" Style. Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 5 Design Standards and Guidelines 77 e) Differences In use of architectural details may occur where the intent Is to differentiate between the residential and commercial scale and character of the structure(s). 3. Scale, Mass and Form a) The scale and mass of a new mixed-use development should be consistent with neighboring developments and not overwhelm them with disproportionate size or incompatible design. Special care should be taken to achieve compatibility next to small-scale buildings; techniques should include limited size and building articulation. b) Building design should employ clean simple geometric forms and coordinated massing that produce an overall sense of unity, scale, and interest. Use simple, strong massing with broken and varied elements. c) Variable building facades along linear street frontages are encouraged. Variable facades create an interesting street scene. Nearly vertical or mansard roofs should be avoided. d) Buildings should incorporate human -scale design elements that generate Interest and diversity, and relate the building to the everyday user. e) The appearance of building mass maybe attenuated with arcades, courtyards, pergolas, color and material changes, and stepping stories back above the ground level. f) Where appropriate, varied roof or parapet heights and/or recessed or extended building walls should be used to create visual interest. 4. Building Modulation and Articulation a) Building design shall avoid large monotonous facades, long straight-line building fronts, plain box shapes, and barren exterior treatment. All building elevations visible from a public right-of-way shall be highly articulated and Incorporate the chosen design theme in a consistent manner. b) Use building form to emphasize individual units within a building, larger units and/or anchor stores within retail projects, and foyers, lobbies, and reception areas within non -retail commercial projects. Use building form and articulation to emphasize public entrances and de-emphasize service areas, and to define and shelter (i.e. give a sense of invitation and enclosure) pedestrian walks and exterior spaces. 78 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park Step down height of buildings and Provide common open space for parking structure to transition to residential uses reskknifal neighborhood Loose retail uses an the omund Modulbte *,,ades wNh dkwqes kv bulkling mM or Poo pro'wmate to me Metm" ftwode "Ohnentpr vkudwwat andtadiffererftte statilam aicross Oovvnhig Avenue betww residentkd OW commexiol Lim This massing model IllustraWs one way a higher denift vertical mixed use project could be developed at Driming and Central Avqnu4m just south of the Matrollmit Station. Under the development standards and design guidelines in M; is Specc Plan, the project uses structured parking to reach maximum density and provides a transition to the adjacent residential neighborhood with lower buildings In the rear Varied building forms, valumettic and pta:nar changes, and vadatlions In roof forms and height, contribute to a well- artkulated building massing, . Public Review Draft .. - December 2014 Chapter 5 Design Standards and Guidelines 79 c) Building articulation can also be accomplished with the placement of windows and entries, volume changes, variable roof forms and height, significant color and material changes, variable transparency, and the creation of shadow textures with trellises and overhangs. d) Commercial facades of mixed-use projects should be modulated at least every 45 feet by changes in building mass or fagade treatment, such as projected entrance windows, roof form or other architectural features. e) Buildings with angled corners, plazas, or other architectural feature are encouraged at corner locations to help anchor the intersection. Building corners may be emphasized by use of elements such as towers, domes or entries. Vertical architectural elements such as towers should be used as focal points. S. Building Facade and Elevation Design a) The elements of a building should relate logically to each other, as well as to surrounding buildings to enhance the characteristics of a particular building or area. The buildings should present an active building elevation including entrances and windows to the street, not blank walls or parking. b) When buildings have a direct relationship to both the street and a major pedestrian corridor or parking lot, all facing fagades should be designed to assure an attractive appearance and include architectural features such as windows, arcades, canopies, pop -outs, and trim to create visual interest, and provide "eyes on the street!' c) Facades should reflect the quality and integrity of the underlying structure in a clear and consistent manner. Architectural elements that define scale and organize space are encouraged; facades should display a sense of order. d) Buildings should contain the traditional three parts of a building: a base, midsection, and a top. On low-rise buildings, the different parts may be expressed through detailing at the building base or eave or cornice line. On taller structures, different treatment of the first, middle, and top stories should be used to define the three parts. e) The base should visually relate to the proportion and scale of the building. Techniques for establishing a base may include richly textured materials (e.g. tile or masonry treatments), darker colored materials, mullion, panels, reveals and/or enriched landscaping. Tops take advantage of the visual prominence of a building's silhouette. Techniques for clearly expressing a top may include cornice treatments, roof overhangs with brackets, richly textured materials 80 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park Outdoor dining adds Interest and activity to the street Windows and openings are re- quired on 75% of the frontage along the streets designated as 'Active Retail Frontage" Retail buildings should have a top, middle and base A and be Pn*eed to a Mdom should be transparent to apow slstency along thefteade primmy facade sign and staled views of the retail interior vp pdat* MVnlmal window signage is permittee! Building Facade and Elevation Design Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 5 Design Standards and Guidelines 81 (e.g. tile, masonry or fluted concrete), and/or differently colored materials. Colored "stripes" are not acceptable as the only treatment. f) Building facades shall be designed to give individual identity to each vertical module, using techniques such as: • Providing a deep notch between the modules, • Varying architectural elements between units (e.g., window color, roof shape, window shape, stoop detail, railing type), Providing porches and balconies, and Varying coloror materials of each Individual module within a harmonious palette of colors and materials, etc. g) The fenestration (design and pattern of doors, windows, awnings, canopies, etc.) should be proportioned to and integrated with the facade modulation of columns and beams and other similar elements. Clear vertical and/ or horizontal hierarchy and patterns in the placement of openings (doors, windows, awnings, canopies, etc.) on the facade should be established. h) Buildings should incorporate architectural details and elements which will reduce building scale at the street level, especially along pedestrian walkways. Awnings, canopies, arbors, trellises, etc. are effective in this regard. The appropriate use of other architectural details, including reveals, course lines, decorative cornice, columns, etc., is also encouraged as a means of creating interest, variety, and distinctive design. I) Details should reflect the structural and material integrity of the building; overly gratuitous ornamentation is discouraged. j) Vertical architectural elements such as towers should be used as focal points. k) Gutters and downspouts should be concealed, unless designed as a decorative architectural feature. 6. Building Entrances a) When residential and commercial uses are combined in the same structure, separate entrances shall be provided for each use. b) Main entries to ground -floor retail uses shall be clearly demarcated, visible and accessible from the street and/or pedestrian walkways. Secondary entries may be from parking areas. c) Entrances to residential, office, or other upper story uses shall be clearly distinguishable in form and location from retail entrances. 82 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park 7. Building Elements d) Building entries should read as such, and be integrated with the overall building form. Variation in building height, wall plane, roof treatment, window placement, architectural detailing, etc. should define and emphasize public entries. Variation in material, texture, and/or color is also recommended as a means of Identifying building entries. e) Entries should be open, inviting, and highly visible. Recessed or deeply shadowed entrances that allow hiding place opportunities should be avoided. Entry doors should be designed to create a sense of welcome, while clearly demarcating the private space. f) Retail entrances should be centrally located within the building fayade, not be recessed more than three feet in depth and be located no more than 50 feet apart. g) Entrances should comprise no more than a third of the ground floor fayade or 15 feet, whichever is less. A typical retail storefront has the following characteristic elements described and illustrated below. Appropriate scaled and proportioned elements should be provided In both the rehabilitation of existing storefronts and the construction of new buildings. a) Bulkhead. A bulkhead, between 15 and 24 inches in height, should be provided at the base of the storefront display window. However, new storefront buildings may use floor to ceiling display windows if the design is compatible with surrounding architecture. b) Entrance Door. Every building entry should be well lit. The entrance door should be kept simple and located centrally in the bugding facade. The door should be made of materials compatible with the building architecture and style. All entrances shall meet handicapped accessibility requirements. c) Display Windows. Retail storefronts should have large display windows oriented toward the street or major pedestrian corridors to establish a visual connection between the interior and exterior of retail building. Display Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 5 Design Standards and Guidelines 83 windows shall provide a clear view of store merchandise or a view into the business interiorto add to the vitality of a retail environment as well as provide "eyes on the street:' To achieve this, the greater portion of the window (at least two-thirds) shall remain clear and free from obstructions. This zone should be between 4 and 8 feet from the base of the fagade. Ground floor wall sections without windows shall not be more than S feet in width. Display windows should consist of a single pane of glass. When required to be divided into smaller sections, clear silicone vertical joints, glazing bars, or muntins should be used. Glazing bars and mullions should be of a minimal size and utilized to enhance the architectural style. The glass should be clear with an exterior daylight reflectance of not more than 8 percent. The use of opaque glass is prohibited. d) Transom Windows. Transom windows may be provided above the display windows. The transom window height depends on the overall ceiling height and ranges from 18 inches to 3 feet. Awnings or canopies should be used to shade the transom windows. Transom windows may have clear, tinted or etched glass. Glass block or decorative metal grilles are also permitted in transoms. Display Windows 84 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park TRANSOM WINDOW WITH GLASS BLOCK LARGE GLASS EXPANSES WITH MULLIONS e) Upper level Windows. The upper level windows should be symmetrically arranged. The number of windows should be based on the storefront modulation at the street level. The windows may be combined into pairs, triples or bands. These windows should be articulated with delineated sills, lintels or frames so as to create shadow lines. f) Pilasters (Storefront Frame). The pilasters on the buildings should be emphasized and articulated on the facade so as to frame it visually. Pilasters may extend the full height of the building or be limited to the storefront level. The use of pilasters should enhance the architectural style of the building. -TAMMI= 1 Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 5 Design Standards and Guidelines 85 q) Canopies or awnings. The size, scale and color of awning(s) should be compatible with the rest of the building; the awning(s) should not be the predominant element of the fapde. Awnings should not cover the storefront piers orpHasters and should be divided Into sections to reflectthe majorvertical divisions of the faCade. The awning should be mounted such that Its valance Is between 8 and 9 feet required for all awnings that encroach or overhang on the sidewalk. "Tre use of aw.-MTRS alGig I W"il:Ways stjrjivto reshiotl W O�Wlj 01 rest kf!r M.M-717 color. Awnings shall not start at the parapet edge of the fagade. The step (the Awning Size and Placement 86 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park Retractable awnings are encouraged, but barrel-shaped awnings are discouraged. Where architecturally appropriate, cantilevered or suspended integral horizontal canopy slabs may be used instead of awnings. Internally lit awnings should not be used. Awnings shall be well maintained, cleaned on a regular basis, and replaced when faded or torn. h) Cornices or parapets. Each building should have a simple cornice. If a parapet is provided, it may be stepped vertically to provide modulation and emphasis on the central module. The cornice should enhance the architectural style of the building. The use of elements such as oversized crown moldings is not permitted. A brick -front building may have a corbelled cornice. A plaster front building may have a stone sill at the parapet line. In Zigzag Moderne buildings, the parapet may be stepped vertically to provide interest. Security Grilles. Visible security grilles are prohibited on the building facade exterior. Security grilles installed on the interior of the storefront are permitted. This installation must be done in a manner such that the grille is concealed from public view when not in use by retracting into casings that are in proportion and scale with the building's architecture. The color of the interior grilles should blend In with the background color so as to reduce their visibility when used. Exterior grilles on existing structures should be removed and placed on the interior of the storefront per these guidelines. Permanent security bars (defined as those clearly visible and fixed to windows on the facade) and roll -up metal security doors (including opaque shutters) are also strongly discouraged. 8. Privacy for Residential Units a) Buildings shall be oriented to promote privacy to the greatest extent possible. Windows of non-residential buildings In a mixed-use development should be oriented to avoid a direct line of site Into adjacent residential buildings or property. In mixed-use developments, residential windows should face away from loading areas and docks. To the extent residential windows face the windows of an adjacent unit; the windows should be offset to maximize privacy. b) Windows, balconies or similar openings should be oriented so as not to have a direct line -of -sight into adjacent units within the development. In addition, units above the first story should be designed so that they do not look directly onto private patios or backyards of adjoining residential property or units. Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 5 Design Standards and Guidelines 87 c) Landscaping may be used to aid in privacy screening and as a buffer from commercial development. d) Security gates should be considered for access to residential uses and residential parking areas. e) Where a mixed-use project abuts a residentially zoned property, a minimum of three feet of the required setbacks adjacent to the residential use shall be devoted entirely to trees and shrubs at least six feet in height (exclusive of any planter area curb). 9. Roof Design a) The roof design should be considered as a component of the overall architectural design theme. Roof forms should be simple, avoid a massive appearance, and reflect the internal organization of buildings. b) New buildings may have flat or sloping roofs, depending on what is most compatible with the architectural style of the building and others in the area. Parapets should appear integrated with the building and should include a cap and corner detail to create a shadow line to enhance the building. Mansard roofs are discouraged. c) As a building feature, sloped roofs help make a visual transition from commercial uses to the surrounding residential neighborhoods. When gabled or pitched roofs are used, careful integration with the primary building and adjacent buildings should be considered in design. Roof slopes should be between 3:12 and 6:12. d) Varied roof forms such as tower elements, extended eaves with rafters and corbels may be used to add interest and to create a consistent style. Roof planes may be extended beyond the building volume to create covered walkways and verandas. e) Roof form and height should be varied to complement building mass and articulation. Vertical variations to the roofline should incorporate roof projections to avoid a false front/unfinished appearance. f) The roofline at the top of the structure should not run in a continuous plane for more than 50 feet without offsetting or jogging the roof plane. 10. Doors and Windows a) Doors and windows are key elements of any structure's form, and should relate to the scale and proportions of the elevation on which they are located. 88 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park Windows and doors can establish character by their rhythm and variety and help to provide depth and contrast on elevation planes. Windows and doors should be used to help mitigate building mass, establish scale, give expression to otherwise blank walls, and create a distinctive building design. b) 'All doors and windows should be related with the chosen architectural style. Windows with widely varying styles are strongly discouraged. All doors and window frames should be made of consistent material. Wherever possible, window sizes should be coordinated vertically and horizontally and window design should be consistent in terms of style and general arrangement on all building sides. c) Window exposure should be maximized along pedestrian walkways. The use of opaque glass adjacent to pedestrian walkways is discouraged. d) Window frames should appear substantial and should not be flush with the exterior finish. Windows should be designed to enhance building interest and articulation. Recessed windows or inset glazing are possible design considerations. e) Windows located on the sides and rear of the project should also be consistent with the look and style on the front of the project. f) Use interior and/or external shading devices to reduce solar heat gain and reduce energy consumption. Windows should beset from the exterior face of wall to create a shadow line. The glazing used for the windows may be clear or partly tinted glass. Highly reflective or dark tinted glass is not permitted. 11. Architectural Lighting a) In mixed use developments, light fixtures for the commercial portion of a building should not cause glare or reflect into the upper stories of buildings. b) In the residential portion of mixed use developments, light fixtures should be directed residential building walls and architectural features to prevent light wash to preserve night sky. in addition, balcony lighting should provide architectural highlights with no illumination beyond the direct boundary of the building. c) Refer to Chapter 4 (Commercial) of the citywide Design Guidelines Manual for additional guidelines on architectural lighting. Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 5 Design Standards and Guidelines 89 12. Materials and Finishes Referto Chapter4 (Commercial) of the citywide Design Guidelines Manual or guidelines on materials and finishes. 13. Color and Texture Refer to Chapter 4 (Commercial) of the citywide Design Guidelines Manual for guidelines on color and texture. 14. Corporate Identity Issues In the commercial portion of a mixed-use development, the use of standardized "corporate" architectural styles associated with franchises is discouraged. Make corporate identity secondary in the design of projects, and consistent with the architecture of the surrounding community. Site specific design solutions are encouraged. The design character should not be a standard franchise prototype and should incorporate dominant characteristics of the neighborhood in which it is located. D. Landscape Design Standards and Guidelines Refer to Chapter 3 (Multi -Family Residential) and Chapter 4 (Commercial) of the citywide Design Guidelines Manual for landscape design guidelines. E. Sustainable Design Standards and Guidelines Green buildings are structures that are designed, constructed, renovated, operated and demolished with minimal environmental impacts. They also exhibit high levels of economic and engineering performance, and save financial resources over the buildings' Lifetime. In essence, building green means reducing the use of resources, minimizing harmful Impacts to the environment, and creating healthier environments for people. Green buildings can incorporate both passive, low-tech design, such as daylighting, and active, high-tech strategies and systems such as photo voltaic panels. To be most effective, green building strategies should be incorporated into all phases of a project from early programming and budgeting, to design and construction, to commissioning, operations, and maintenance and post -use demolition/recycling. 1. Site Design and Passive Solar Design a) Buildings should be sited and designed to maximize the use of sunlight and shade for energy savings, and respect the solar access of adjacent buildings. 90 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park Green ;no. gem several purposes for a building, such as absorbing providingso; and helping W I4 ' urban &W temperatures and mitigate the heat structures ¢ other buildings oftr potential for selair reek which capture sunlight 0 transform it Into energy. Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 5 Design Standards and Guidelines 91 b) Buildings shoo Id be clustered forshade, andlincorporate protective coluirtya rds, recessed windows and doors, and Insulated %ok. r.) Ib reduce energy us�e, the east and west walls afthei buillidiinigs should bo shaded with evergreen trees to reduce surnmer heat gain,, Soutik walls should be shaded with deciduous trees. d) Walkways and plazas should be dusigned to collect stormwater where feasible. 2i BuIldiii,ig, I)esign A) The provision of a green roof should be strongly considereclAo reduce solar gain ('whiich contributes ft the urban heat island effect) and ft mduce the 4vantity of water entering the storm drain system. &I S�olar,painels on roofs should be considered tocapturesolar enogy for internal use of the Project. c) Arcades, covered walkways, trellises aml passages, should be incorporated to provide sheltered areas for pedestrian circulation 41 well as Ateds the buildings to reduce, energy usage. 3. Water Efficiency si, To reduce water use and maiinten,aince costs, the majority of the plant , materials should be droughit tolerant and ow maintenance., 92 Downtown T06 Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park Circulation and Parking A. Introduction This chapter defines the Specific Plan provisions for circulation and parking within the Downtown TOO Specific Plan area. The Plan takes advantage of the central location of the Metrolink Station and emphasizes a multimodal approach to circulation — to afford convenient access to and circulation within the area for all transportation modes. Consistent with the City's policies for Complete Streets, the Plan is intended to provide not only effective auto circulation, but also choices and opportunities for effective and convenient transit, pedestrian and bicycle circulation. Residents, employees, and visitors should be also able to conveniently park, and also to walk around the area in an attractive, safe and comfortable environment. The Specific Plan therefore provides for a balance between all transportation modes in the Downtown. B. Complete Streets 1. Complete Streets in the City of Baldwin Park A growing number of communities are discovering the value of their streets as important public spaces for many aspects of daily life. People want streets that are safe to cross or walk along, offer places to meet people, link healthy neighborhoods, and have a vibrant mix of retail. More people want to be able to walk and ride bicycles in their neigh borhoods.As a result, an increasing number of cities are looking to modify the way they design their streets, to design and/or change streets for health, safety, livability, sustainability, and by introducing design elements which ensure the co -existence with pedestrians and other modes on non -motorized transportation. The City of Baldwin Park has embraced these principles. In July 2011 the City adopted a Complete Streets Policy, which was considered to the most progressive in the country by the National Complete Streets Coalition. The City followed up in May 2012 by adopting a Manual for living Streets Design, to provide direction to design and/ or change streets for health, safety, livability and sustainability, for people of all ages Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 6 Circulation and Parking 93 and physical abilities, and to accommodate all modes of travel. While moving vehicles is one of their purposes, streets are spaces, even destinations In and of themselves. By approaching streets as public spaces, cities redirect their attention from creating traffic conduits to designing a place for the people who use the street. As articulated In the City's Manual for Living Streets Design, Complete Streets accomplish the following In a transportation context: • Are designed to provide transportation for people of all ages, income levels, and physical abilities whether they walk, bicycle, ride transit, or drive. • Integrate connectivity and traffic calming with pedestrian -oriented site and building design to create safe and inviting places. • Serve the land uses that are adjacent to the street; mobility is a means, not an end. • Encourage people to travel by walking, bicycling, and transit, and to drive less. • Enhance the safety and security of streets, from both a traffic and personal perspective. In the broader civic context, Complete Streets also: • Are inviting places with engaging architecture, street furniture, landscaping, and public art that reflect the diversity and cultures of the neighborhood. • Foster healthy commerce. • Encourage active and healthy lifestyles, and improve peoples' health. • Create livable neighborhoods. • Reduce the total amount of paved area. • Reduce streetwater runoff Into watersheds, and maximize infiltration and reuse of stormwater. • Reduce greenhouse gas emissions and other air pollution, and reduce energy consumption. • Promote the economic well-being of both businesses and residents. • Increase civic space and encourage human Interaction. 2. Complete Streets in the Specific Plan Area The Downtown TOD Specific Plan fully embraces the City's Complete Street principles. This section of the Specific Plan outlines the key features and functions of Complete Streets and the design elements that can be used to achieve them. The Specific Plan identifies the following policies for Complete Streets: Streets in Downtown should conform to the principles of Complete Streets wherever feasible. They should function to provide balanced and efficient transportation for all modes. 94 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park • A key goal of the specific Plan is therefore to slow and calm traffic, to enhance access to transit, and to enhance pedestrian and bicycle circulation access to and circulation within Downtown. • The design of any street improvements and/or modifications should conform with the City's Complete Streets Policy and the City's Manual for Living Streets Design. Practices which support Complete Streets principles, and which should be featured in Downtown where feasible include the following: Provide a Feeling of Safety and Security on Streets - Slow traffic to a comfortable speed to mix with other travel modes through: low speed design elements, traffic calming techniques, and shared space. - Maintain a buffer between pedestrians and vehicles when there is fast moving traffic using: on -street parking, or sidewalk features such as planters, bollards, kiosks, newsstands, lampposts. Connect Both Sides of the Street - Shorten crossing distance through: narrow travel lanes, curb extensions and pedestrian islands, building activities connected to the street. - Invite people to cross in more places by: slowing vehicular traffic, establishing mid -block crossings, making shared streets._ Support and Encourage Activities and Destinations - Widen sidewalks to accommodate multiple activities - Open streets to multiple activities The Specific Plan includes these elements wherever feasible, to maximize transit, bicycle, and pedestrian access and use of the Downtown streets. Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 6 Circulation and Parking 95 C. The Circulation Network City streets provide the backbone of the Complete Streets network in the Downtown. Key east -west streets in Downtown include Ramona Boulevard, Badillo Street, and Clark Street. Key north -south streets include Baldwin Park Boulevard, Maine Avenue, Pacific Avenue, Bogart Avenue, and Downing Avenue. 1. General Plan Street Designations The City's General Plan includes the following designations for streets in the Specific Plan area (Figure 6-1). Arterial Street This classification provides for an 80 -foot curb -to -curb road width within a maximum 100 -foot right of way. A four lane divided roadway is typically provided within this street section, or potentially six narrow lanes if on -street parking is prohibited. Ramona Boulevard is classified as an Arterial in the City's General Plan. It has a very wide right-of-way (230 feet), and a roadway with four traffic lanes, wide curb lanes, bike lanes in each direction, raised median, and left turn lanes at intersections. On - street parking is generally prohibited on both sides of the roadway. Howeverfor much of its length in the Specific Plan, there are areas immediately adjacent to and parallel to the street, separated from the street by a small median, which provide a parking bay with two rows of diagonal parking. Baldwin Park Boulevard is also classified as an Arterial in the City's General Plan. It is a four -lane street with central turn lane (north of Ramona Boulevard) or raised median (south of Ramona Boulevard), and left turn lanes at intersections. On -street parking is generally provided on both sides of the street with some restrictions. Collector/Industrial Street This classification provides for a 64 -foot curb -to -curb road width within a maximum 80 -foot right of way, and provides for a four lane street. Maine Avenue north of the intersection with Pacific Avenue and continuing north of Ramona Boulevard Is classified as a Collector street In the City's General Plan. It is a four -lane street. Over much of its length there is a painted median and left turn lanes are provided at intersections. On -street parking is not allowed on the east side of the street, and Is allowed on the west side in certain areas with some time restrictions. Pacific Avenue is classified as a Collector street in City's General Plan. It is a four -lane street and left turn lanes are provided at intersections. On -street parking is generally provided on both sides of the street with some restrictions. 96 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park Other Streets All other streets in the Specific Plan are local streets. They are generally two-lane streets with on -street parking permitted where the width allows, although there are some street segments where it is prohibited. The key circulation streets in the Specific Plan include Clark Street, Bogart Avenue, Downing Avenue, and Maine Avenue west of Pacific Avenue. The exception is Badillo Street which is a four -lane street with raised median and left turn lanes at intersections, with on -street parking allowed on the south side of the street but prohibited on the north side. 2. Specific Plan Street Functions and Complete Streets There is currently adequate roadway circulation in the Downtown, with an adequate number of streets and roadway capacity. Despite the existence of a Metrolink rail station and numerous bus routes, Downtown Baldwin Park is very auto oriented and both bicycle unfriendly and pedestrian unfriendly. Ramona Boulevard, with its wide cross section, median, and adjacent parking bays, is a very wide street which tends to bisect the Downtown. The Specific Plan envisions all streets accommodating all modes of travel. It envisages both Ramona Boulevard and Maine Avenue as Downtown Boulevards. These two streets will function as the Complete Streets spines of the Downtown. There is the opportunity for Ramona Boulevard to unify the downtown rather than separating it, by becoming an attractive pedestrian environment for pedestrians walking along it, and making it easier for pedestrians to cross the street. There are opportunities for improving connections and linkages across Ramona Avenue including pedestrian and bicycle crossings, to tie both sides of the street closer together, to improve safety, and to connect neighborhoods north of Ramona to Downtown Baldwin Park and the Metrolink Station. In pursuance of the Complete Street goals, the Specific Plan identifies pedestrian and bicycle improvements at many locations, particularly on Ramona Boulevard and Maine Avenue as the key boulevards, and identifies a bicycle network providing for enhanced bicycle access to, and circulation within, Downtown. Ramona Boulevard —The Grand Boulevard The Specific Plan identifies Improvements intended to create a Grand Pedestrian boulevard along Ramona Boulevard in Downtown, which is intended to function as the Complete Street spine to the Downtown. The existing and proposed cross- sections for Ramona Boulevard are shown in Figures 6-2 and 6-3 The existing street width and number of traffic lanes will be retained. However the adjacent public right- of-way areas containing diagonal parking (the parking bays) will be reconfigured. One 98 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park row of diagonal parking (closest to the street) will be removed, and the sidewalks widened. The row of diagonal parking adjacent to the buildings will be retained. This will create a wider and generous landscaped pedestrian way adjacent to the buildings while retaining convenient parking located next to the commercial land uses. This will allow the creation of a grand pedestrian boulevard along the length of Ramona Boulevard. Pedestrian connections and linkages across Ramona Boulevard will tie both sides of the street closer together and improve linkages from north of Ramona Boulevard to the Metrolink Station, as well as improving linkages to Morgan Park. These will include: • Intersection Improvements with upgraded (widerand morevisible)crosswalks; • More pedestrian friendly signal timing (countdown timers); • Establishing and signing wayfinding routes; and • Providing a signalized midblock crossing of Ramona Boulevard between Maine Avenue and Bogart Avenue. To facilitate bicycle circulation, the existing bicycle lane on Ramona Boulevard will be maintained and improved. The roadway will be restriped to retain but narrow the existing two traffic lanes in each direction (for example to a 13 -foot lane and a 11 -foot lane), in order to provide a wider bicycle lane (6' compared to the existing 4' lanes). The bicycle lane will be colored to provide greater visibility, and a 4' striped separation between the bicycle lane and the moving traffic lanes will be added. These measures will help to calm traffic and enhance bicycle safety along the boulevard. In order to further improve the pedestrian environment and calm traffic on the frontage roads, the driveways from Ramona Boulevard will be modified from the existing 45 degree angle (which encourages faster traffic) to a 90 degree angle (which will slow traffic down). Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 6 Circulation and Parking 99 ------------- m MD a< s 100 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park a .,t R 0 a 0 w d C N . O R 0 I Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 6 Circulation and Parking 101E MID .._._ . _ — — — — ___ 71 I Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 6 Circulation and Parking 101E Maine Avenue — A Downtown Boulevard A goal of the Specific Plan is for Maine Avenue to become another Downtown Boulevard, functioning as a north -south Complete Street and a second spine for multimodal circulation in the Downtown, further improving linkages to the neighborhoods to the north. However, there are constraints of street and right-of- way width that limit these opportunities. The existing street has very little on -street parking and the sidewalks are narrow (often less than 10 -feet), with adjacent buildings at the property line preventing widening of sidewalks into the adjacent rights-of-way. Sidewalks could only be widened if the road was narrowed — which would require a reduction in the number of traffic lanes (often referred to as a road diet). The existing cross section of Maine Avenue varies between Ramona Boulevard and Clark Street. Two typical existing cross sections are shown in Figure 6-4 - just south of Park Plaza Drive and between Palmrose Street and Clark Street. Figure 6-4 also shows potential cross sections at these locations under a road diet concept. To the north of the Specific Plan area, the City is considering implementing a planned Complete Street Project for Maine Avenue north of Los Angeles Street to Arrow Highway which would include a road diet. Currently in planning, this project would calm traffic and improve the pedestrian and bicycle environment — by reducing the number of traffic lanes from four to three lanes (one lane in each direction with a central turn lane/median), adding bicycle lanes in each direction, adding landscape in the median, installing curb extensions, retaining most on -street parking, and potentially adding two small roundabouts. It is not immediately clear if a similar concept would be viable south of Los Angeles Street to Ramona Boulevard because of the higher traffic volumes, a narrower right- of-way south of the Park Plaza Driveway, and the generally higher level of traffic activity in this predominantly commercial area. The Complete Street configuration from the project to the north could potentially be extended as far south as Palmrose Street, as this stretch of Maine Avenue has the same general width characteristics as north of Los Angeles Street. South of Palmrose Street the street width and right-of- way are narrower, and while a road diet could be implemented to reduce the number of traffic lanes from four to three the narrower roadway width would only allow the provision of bicycle lanes or the Introduction of on -street parking, but not both. The introduction of a road diet along this length of Maine Avenue may not be feasible without some reduction in traffic volumes. One possible way to accomplish that is to try to reduce the volume of traffic using Maine Avenue as a through route between Ramona Boulevard and Arrow Highway by signing the through route along Baldwin Park Boulevard - which as an arterial roadway is better suited to carrying such traffic than Maine Avenue which is a Collector Street. 102 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park Maine Avenue South of Park Plum Drive Figure 6-4: Maine Avenue Existing and Proposed Cross -Sections Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 6 Circulation and Parking 103 ,'�i�; Hyl r;�. �� ,gym N:i� ��' /� � �H,,� �!�,,� w�mw�✓""a���l � ��,; r/ fl mm r �k �µ�✓m '�i r G r � � i r/ � i ti am OP l il rn'�d��a•+w�" r, '� „,,gyp �v_/w,,, n,,, ��,�IJrilirA � i� "�� �" �� ,tl��Na D. Automobile Circulation The existing street system will be maintained in its current configuration, with some changes/improvements designed to improve access and circulation, and walkability, as described elsehere. Key access corridors to and within Downtown will continue to be Ramona Boulevard, Badiilo Street, Baldwin Park Boulevard, Maine Avenue, and Pacific Avenue. Other local circulation streets within Downtown will continue to be Clark Street, Sterling Way, Bogart Avenue, and Downing Avenue. The number of traffic lanes, and roadway lane configurations will remain the same. The Circulation System is shown in Figure 6.1. 1. Street Improvements and Changes The following improvements are already planned and budgeted: • Install new traffic signal at the intersection of Pacific Avenue and Bogart Avenue. The following changes to the street system will be made: The section of Maine Avenue between Pacific Avenue and Sterling Way (opposite City Hall) will be fully or partially vacated. Sterling Way will be realigned eastward at Ramona Boulevard- from the current tee -intersection to a four way intersection with Cesar Chavez Drive. These changes will simplify the local circulation in this area, and will allow the creation of an area west of City Hall for a new civic plaza and a potential development site. Access to all existing properties in the area will be maintained, Including the provision of a new alley to run at the rear of the commercial uses fronting on Ramona Boulevard between Maine Avenue and Sterling Way in order to maintain local access and deliveries. An alternative to fully closing Maine Avenue would be to only close It in the eastbound direction, with westbound traffic movements still allowed. These changes will enhance pedestrian circulation in this area and simplify the currently complicated "double" intersection of Sterling Way and Cesar Chavez Drive Into a single consolidated intersection. Other circulation improvements will improve the rail track crossings of the streets in Downtown. The City will work with Metrolink to install full quad -gate crossings (that extend across the entire street unlike the current half gates which only extend across half the street) on Pacific Avenue west of the Metrolink Station, and on Downing Avenue east of the station. These quad gates improve traffic safety as they prevent any traffic from crossing the tracks while the gates are down (whereas the half gates allow the possibility of traffic driving around the gates). Quad gates are not necessary Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 6 Circulation and Parking 105 on Ramona Boulevard east of the station because the median island prevents traffic from driving around the gates. Currently traffic delays are caused at certain times on Pacific Avenue when the crossing gates remain down while a westbound train is standing at the station. This is not controlled by the city but occurs under Metrolink operating practices and is regulated by the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) for safety reasons. The City will explore with Metrolink and the PUC if there is a safe alternative operating practice that can be operated that would result in the gates being down for a shorter period of time — thus minimizing traffic delays. The changes to enhance pedestrian and bicycle circulation along Ramona Boulevard to create the Grand Boulevard were described previously. The existing and proposed cross sections of Ramona Boulevard are provided In Figures 6-2 and 6-3. These changes would remove approximately 150 on -street parking spaces (about half of the current supply) along Ramona Boulevard, which would be accommodated elsewhere in the Downtown. This is described in more detail in Chapter 7 (Parking) of this plan. The potentials and constraints for a road diet on Maine Avenue were also discussed previously and are illustrated In Figure 6-4. E. Transit Circulation The Specific Plan area is currently served by a total of six transit routes, of which one is a Metro bus route, three are Foothill Transit routes, and two are Baldwin Park Transit routes (the local Baldwin Park service). All of these routes have stops close to or nearby the Baldwin Park Metrolink station. The Specific Plan area is also served by the Baldwin Park Metrolink Station. There are currently approximately 385 boardings per weekday at the Metrolink Station. 1. Transit Service Downtown will continue to be served by the Baldwin Park Metrolink Station, as well as numerous regional Metro and Foothill Transit bus routes, and the local Baldwin Park Transit Shuttle. It is expected that bus routes will remain largely as today, serving the core of downtown and focused on the Metrolink Station. Figures 6-5 and 6-6 show the anticipated transit routes and the streets carrying transit service. The City will continue to work with both Metro and Foothill Transit to retain the existing levels of transit service at a minimum, and to expand the service in the future through the possibility of increased service frequencies on existing routes and the addition of new routes, to improve regional transit access to downtown. 106 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park The City will also continue to operate the local Baldwin Park Transit routes serving downtown. bus service. It is anticipated that service routes will remain the same, as they currently serve the Metrolink Station and run within walking distance of all Specific Plan locations. As future new development occurs in the downtown, the routes and service frequencies should be evaluated on a regular basis and potentially changed as necessary. 2. Metrolink Station Access There are currently poor connections to the Metrolink Station, which is hidden away from downtown, with few clear pedestrian access routes. The pedestrian environment Is unfriendly at the entrance to the station at the intersection of Ramona Boulevard and Downing Avenue. The Specific Plan will encourage and enhance accessibility to local and regional public transportation by Improving connectivity to the Baldwin Park Metrolink Station and other public transit providers. These are discussed under Pedestrian Circulation. 3. Bus Stops and Amenities There are currently sufficient bus stop locations in downtown. However, the bus stops should be improved throughout the downtown, including the provision of bus shelters and bus stop amenities such as seating, lighting, and route/schedule information. The City should work with Metro and Foothill Transit to introduce digital electronic signs With route/schedule and bus arrival status Information in the future. 4. Provision for The Mid -Valley Transportation Corridor In recent years, the 2010 Mid -Valley Bus Rapid Transit Preliminary Feasibility Study, and the Envisioning the Mid -Valley Transportation Corridor Plan study provided a vision, recommendations and actions, fortransforming the Ramona Boulevard —Badillo Street Corridor (between Covina and EI Monte) from an auto -oriented suburban area into a truly walkable, urban, transit oriented place, including the provision of high quality bus rapid transit (BRT) service along the corridor. Bus rapid transit (BRT) is an innovative, flexible, and high performance transit mode that uses buses or specialized vehicles on roadways or dedicated lanes to quickly and efficiently transport passengers to their destination. BRT systems can equal or exceed the performance of most rail systems but at a fraction of the price due to reduced construction, Infrastructure, and maintenance costs. Common features of a bus rapid transit system that are different from most conventional bus systems include: • High-capacity vehicles • Rail -like spacing between stations for fewer stops and express travel times • More frequent service Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 6 Circulation and Parking 107 • Real-time vehicle location and schedule information In some instances BRT systems also include: • Exclusive bus lanes separated from other roadways (in certain locations) • Rail -like station amenities with level boarding platforms • Traffic signal priority • Off -vehicle fare collection The Envisioning the Mid -Valley Transportation Corridor Plan explored the land use, transportation, and urban design changes that could be implemented to increase the feasibility of future BRT along the Ramona-Badillo Corridor. The Plan identified strategies for multi -modal transportation and opportunities for transit -oriented development (TOD) including a mixture of land uses integrated into a walkable neighborhood and located adjacent to quality public transportation. TOD was considered an important tool to increase transit ridership and support high-quality transit in the corridor. The study identified TOD strategies for Downtown Baldwin Park — but did not envisage a separate right-of-way or separate bus lanes along Ramona Boulevard in the Downtown. The provisions of this Specific Plan are consistent with the general recommendations of the Mid Valley Transportation Corridor Plan, particularly with respect to TOD strategies. The Specific Plan does not preclude any future implementation of BRT service along Ramona Boulevard through Downtown Baldwin Park. F. Pedestrian Circulation Boulevard,Within the Specific Plan area, r there is a mature network of sidewalks which provide pedestrian accesspn, alli miailot streets such as Ramona k ll Baldwin Park Boul6arO . Malne A�enue, -6ogart Avenue, and Downing Avenue. However, the street environment in downtown Baldwin Park is not pedestrian friendly, and linkages between the various areas are poor and difficult. There is therefore a great need to improve the pedestrian environment and connections/linkages between key areas of the Downtown. 1. Pedestrian Network The pedestrian circulation component of the Specific Plan will encourage pedestrian activity and walking as a transportation mode. The Specific Plan identifies a pedestrian circulation network, illustrated in Figure 6-7, which provides pedestrian pathways throughout Downtown Baldwin Park along with connections to the adjoining commercial and residential areas and to augment the pedestrian walking experience and provide a safe environment. 110 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park An off-street walkway system, using improwd alleys and new pedestrian paths, wig offer continuous pedestrian circulation between community facilities, the Metrolink 110, Station, and within and between new mbced use and retail developments, greatly Improving the pedestrian appeal of Downtown. The Specific Plan identifies a number of measures to enhance walkability and to Improve pedestrian connections within Downtown. These are described below and shown in Figure 6-7. Ramona Boulevard and Maine Avenue Ramona Boulevard will be modified to create a grand pedestrian boulevard, as Identified in the Complete Streets section of this Specific Plan. Proposals. for improving the pedestrian environment along Maine Avenue are also identified In that section. These two streets will function as the spines for the pedestrian network in Downtown. Connections and linkages across Ramona Boulevard, will tie both sidet of the street closer toether and improve linkages from north of Ramona Boulevard to the Metrolink Station, Including the provision of a new, signalised mid -block crossing of Ramona Boulevard between Maine avenue and Bogart Avenue. Off -Street Walkway System To supplement the street sidewalk, a network of alleys and off-street walkways will be established as an additional pedestrian circulation network in the downtown. This off-street network will connect key places and land uses and provide Interesting and convenient additional mid -block walking routes for pedestrians. The off-street network Is shown 1n Figure 6-7. 112 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park 2. Street Crossings and Other Pedestrian Improvements Intersection improvements to enhance pedestrian circulation and safety can be implemented throughout Downtown, including: • enhanced crosswalks (highly visible zebra crosswalk striping and/or paving); • more pedestrian friendlysignal timing (adding countdown pedestrian signals); • curb extensions/bulbouts • and establishing and signing wayfinding routes. These improvements can be Implemented on a case-by-case basis, and their design should follow the guidelines in the City's Manual for Living Streets Design. 3. Access to the Metrolink Station The pedestrian network provides for improved linkages to the Metrolink Station, including the following: A new mid -block connection will be provided on Ramona Boulevard between Bogart Avenue and Maine Avenue to enhance access to the Metrolink Station; Sidewalks and pedestrian landscaping along Bogart Avenue between Pacific Avenue and Downing Avenue will be enhanced; Pedestrian improvements will also be implemented at the entrance to the Metrolink Station at the intersection of Ramona Boulevard and Downing Avenue, and at the track crossing of Pacific Avenue at the south end of the Station. These will include clearly defined pedestrian paths to provide safe pedestrian passage, better fencing of the tracks, and working with Metrolinkto implement state of the art pedestrian safety features such as improved pedestrian control gates. The sidewalks and track surface will also be improved in those crossing areas to facilitate pedestrian passage. 4. Wayfinding and Directional Signage A pedestrian wayfinding and signage program will be implemented throughout the Downtown, to provide clear signage to key locations and destinations. G. Bicycle Circulation There are currently few bicycle facilities in downtown, few bike lanes and little bike parking, so bicycling by the local population Is not encouraged, and by the lack of amenities is In fact discouraged. The Specific Plan contains a number of measures to remedy this situation and improve the environment for bicyclists. Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 6 Circulation and Parking 113 An enhanced bicycle network serving downtown, and the provision of a significant number of bicycle parking spaces, will significantly enhance bicycle access to and within downtown and encourage greater use of bicycle as a mode of transportation. 1. Bicycle Lanes and Bicycle Routes A Class II Bicycle Lane consists of a designated striped lane along the curb lane of a street. It provides for one-way travel and is generally delineated with special striping and signage. A Class III Bicycle Route is for shared use of bicycles with automobile traffic. Signs are posted which indicate the road also serves as a bike route, but no special lane for bicycles is striped. There may however be painted bicycle symbols on the roadways surface (known as sharrows) to indicate to motorists that bicycles also use the street. 2. The Bicycle Network The Specific Plan Bicycle Network, shown in Figure 6-8, includes a combination of Class II and Class III facilities to provide a connected and integrated bicycle network in the downtown, and to connect downtown to the adjacent neighborhoods. The Specific Plan identities Class II facilities where feasible. However, on -street parking Is also an important asset to the function and economic well-being of downtown, so where there is insufficient roadway width to stripe bicycle lanes and to retain on - street parking, a connected network is achieved through the designation of Class III Bicycle Routes. The General Plan calls for Class II bicycle lanes on Ramona Boulevard and Baldwin Park Boulevard north of Ramona Boulevard, and Class III bicycle routes on Baldwin Park Boulevard south of Ramona Boulevard, Sterling Way, and Pacific Avenue. These are all retained in the Specific Plan. The existing bike lane on Ramona Boulevard will be maintained and improved. The roadway will be restriped to retain the exiting two traffic lanes in each direction, but will be reconfigure4 to provide a wider bicycle lane (6' compared to the existing 4' lanes), the bicycle lane will be colored to provide greater visibility, and a 4' striped separation to the moving traffic lanes will be added. These modifications will enhance bicycle safety. Bicycle Routes will be established on the following streets In the Specific Plan area: Baldwin Park Boulevard south of Ramona Boulevard, Sterling Way, and Pacific Avenue south of Maine Avenue (all as specified in the General Plan), as well as on Maine Avenue, Bogart Avenue, Downing Avenue south of Ramona Boulevard, and Central Avenue. These routes are not currently in the General Plan. 114 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park 3. Bicycle Parking Additional bike parking facilities will be provided at numerous locations around downtown, to provide safe opportunities for cyclists to park and leave their bikes while they walk around the downtown, which will further encourage and facilitate the use of bicycles. Bicycle spaces will be provided in readily accessible locations that are highly visible in order to ensure personal safety and protect against theft. General planned locations are shown in Figure 6-8. These include spaces at the Metrolink Station, at major bus stops, at mid -block locations, and at/near major commercial destinations, to increase the convenience of bicycle use. H. Parking The overall strategy of the Specific Plan for parking in Downtown is to provide sufficient parking to ensure the economic viability and success of Downtown, to provide parking in convenient locations to users, and to efficiently manage parking in a manner that supports a walkable and pedestrian -friendly environment in Downtown Baldwin Park. The supply of parking should be carefully balanced with the need for parking. An oversupply of parking takes up valuable land that could be used for better purposes and also encourages additional auto use—which is inconsistent with the overall goals of a transit -oriented district. The Baldwin Park Zoning Code parking standards are citywide and oriented for dependency on automobiles. The Intent of the Specific Plan is transit -oriented development and a walkable environment in the Downtown, which provides an opportunity for revised parking standards in a mixed use Downtown that will allow for more emphasis on walking and biking for personal mobility. In order to achieve an efficient utilization of overall parking resources Downtown, the Specific Plan therefore embraces a "Park Once" strategy, where visitors can park once in a convenient location, and then walk around Downtown as they visit multiple destinations without having to re -park their cars. This also embraces the concept of shared parking, where parking supplies are available to all users, rather than being limited to a single land use or building. 1. General Parking Characteristics in Downtowns Downtowns contain many different land uses, that are located in close proximity, and that Interact with each other. Downtown users and visitors can therefore park and leave their car to visit multiple destinations by walking rather than driving and having to park again. When the uses in downtowns have different time profiles of peak parking demands, 116 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park then parking spaces can be shared between uses — resulting in fewer total spaces being necessary than for "stand-alone" buildings in more suburban locations. Also because of the multiplicity of uses there are better opportunities to manage and share parking resources, particularly where a significant proportion of parking spaces are in public ownership or under public control. Research and experience in other cities has shown that actual parking needs in downtown areas are often between 25% and 50% less than the theoretical requirements of city parking codes. Some cities have therefore not only reduced parking requirements in downtown areas, but have also instituted a "flat rate" parking requirement for commercial land uses in some cases as low as 2.0 or 2.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2. Parking in Downtown Baldwin Park There is already a substantial amount of parking in the downtown, including public parking. In total there are approximately 2,621 parking spaces in the Specific Plan area, of which about half are public and half are private. Excluding the parking supply for Morgan Park and the Metrolink Station, there are approximately 1,950 spaces available for approximately 775,000 square feet of commercial building area. ;This translates to a supply of about 2.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft., which is about 63% less than the citywide code requirement of 4.0 per 1000 sq. ft. for office and retail commercial uses, and is consistent with the experience often found in other cities. From observations in Downtown Baldwin Park, while parking in some localized areas is fully utilized, in other areas it is less than fully utilized, Indicating that the total overall supply is adequate. 3. Downtown TOD Specific Plan Parking Strategy The Parking Strategy comprises the following elements, designed to provide an integrated and comprehensive approach to parking in the Downtown Area: a) Park Once. The Plan is based on the "Park Once" concept, where people are encouraged to park once in one location and then walk around Downtown to multiple destinations. This reduces the need for parking, reduces vehicular traffic and vehicle emissions, consolidates the parking supply into fewer strategic locations, and improves the pedestrian environment by increasing pedestrian volumes on sidewalks (which also increases the volume of potential patrons passing by on -street businesses). Many of the key activity centers and destinations are located within a convenient walkable distance of a quarter mile walk of each other and the Metrolink Station. b) Allow Shared Parking. The Plan allows the use of shared parking in order to minimize overall parking supply needs and to allow for the most efficient Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 6 Circulation and Parking 117 utilization of parking resources. The existing zoning code contains certain provisions for shared parking in Subchapter 153.150.120. These provisions are extended in the Specific Plan area, to include the shared use of public parking facilities, and to extend the allowable distance between uses sharing parking to 1,000 feet. c) Encourage Use of Alternative Modes to Reduce Parking Demand. The City should encourage the use of alternate transportation modes, such as transit and bicycling, and should encourage transportation demand management programs, to reduce the overall demand for parking. The Metrollnk station provides a unique opportunity to reduce auto trips and parking demand in the Downtown area. d) Encourage Employeesto Use Off -Street Parking Facilities. The Cityshould work with the private sector and the Downtown business community to encourage employees to use off-street parking, rather than short-term on -street spaces, so that the on -street spaces are conveniently available for visitors. This can also be facilitated by Increased and more effective enforcement of short-term on -street parking e) Provide Parking Supply Information. The City or the Downtown Business Improvement District should prepare and distribute, with ongoing updates as necessary, enhanced parking supply information for visitors and employees, including brochures and maps showing parking locations, and encouraging the "Park Once" strategy. This could include the use of on -street directional and informational signage and/or web -based information systems. f) Metrolink Parking. The Specific Plan envisages the redevelopment of the existing surface Metrolink parking lots at the station and the intersection of Ramona Boulevard and Badillo Street, and the relocation of Metrolink parking from those lots to the Transit Center Garage on Bogart Avenue. 4. Parking Requirements in the Specific Plan Area The parking requirements and standards contained in Subchapter 153.150 of the City of Baldwin Park Municipal Code shall be followed, except for the provisions required In this Specific Plan. The Specific Plan provides for the following modifications for the Municipal Code parking requirements in the Downtown TOD Specific Plan Area. These modifications are introduced in order to provide a parking supply that is more closely tailored to the actual needs of Downtown land uses, to avoid the over overprovision of parking supply, and to allow greater flexibility in the provision of required parking. They are also intended to facilitate and encourage smaller businesses and land uses in Downtown for which parking requirements may otherwise be too restrictive. 118 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park To reflect the characteristics of Downtown and the transit -oriented district around on the Metrolink Station, the following parking requirement adjustments shall apply for the Specific Plan Area: Parking requirements for commercial uses shall be 75% of the citywide requirement in Subchapter 153.150. Parking requirements for residential multi -family uses shall be 1 space per bedroom (maximum of 3 spaces per unit) and 1 guest space per 10 units. To support "Park Once", shared parking shall be allowed as per Subchapter 153.150, subject to a Shared Parking Report, with the following additional provisions: • Shared parking may also apply to public parking facilities. • The distance within which off-site code -required parking,can be located shall be 1,000 feet. • The City shall encourage the owners of private parking facilities to make them available to all downtown users. Future Parking Supply Based on the projected Increase of approximately 444,000 sq. ft. of new commercial development in the Downtown, and the parking provisions identified above, an additional 1,385 parking spaces would be required in the Downtown. Further application of shared parking, and use of alternative modes, could reduce this number. This additional parking can be provided in surface lots or in structured parking. It may be provided on private property or in public facilities. An ideal location for a new public parking garage would be the existing Laurens Avenue Lot, which is central to all areas of the Downtown. Any new private commercial parking should be open to all users to facilitate future shared parking and "park once". A Downtown Parking Study should be conducted to further evaluate in detail the future parking needs and preferred supply options, verify the potential for shared parking, and develop a parking management plan for the downtown. Bicycle Parking In the Specific Plan Area the provisions in Subchapter 153.150 shall apply for bicycle parking, except that there shall be no maximum limit for number of spaces to be provided for commercial uses. Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 6 Circulation and Parking 119 120 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park Infrastructure A. Introduction The purpose of this chapter is to summarize the existing and planned infrastructure facilities and provide recommended infrastructure upgrades for the Baldwin Park Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Specific Plan area. The recommended upgrades are based on comparing the existing facilities and their capabilities/capacities with the proposed development within the Specific Plan area. An analysis was conducted for the existing infrastructure facilities in the Specific Plan area and was presented in the Baseline Infrastructure Study, prepared in May 2014. The proposed development within the Specific Plan area is assumed to be at maximum "build -out" condition based on the Specific Plan zoning. The recommendations provided In this chapter will serve as a guideline for future improvements to the infrastructure within the Specific Pian area. B. Water System There are three water purveyors providing water services in the city of Baldwin Park: Valley County Water District (VCWD), San Gabriel Valley Water Company and Valley View Mutual Water Company. VCWD is the water service provider for Downtown Baldwin Park. There are potable water lines under almost all streets and alleys within the Specific Plan area. The sizes of the potable water ilnes vary from 4 to 12 inches. Most of the pipes are ST (steel pipe) with the exception of a few Poly Vinyl Chloride (PVC) pipes. Figure 8-1 shows the layout of the existing water lines. There are two identified areas within the Specific Plan boundary where there will be significant increase in water usage in units of gallons per day (GPD) when comparing the post development conditions to existing conditions. The first area is the existing City -owned Metrolink parking lot on the east side of the Specific Plan area, at the in- tersection of Ramona Boulevard and Badillo Street. This property is being rezoned to Mixed Use i (MU -1). Although this will create an increase In the water usage and fire flow demand, the existing 12 -Inch ST under Ramona Boulevard will be able to handle the increment after the development. The second area Is the residential area located Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 7 Infrastructure 121 along Bogart Avenue, north of Ramona Boulevard. A higher residential density is as- sumed for this area at full build -out. The demand for domestic water usage and fire flow requirements will require the existing 6 -inch ST water line on Bogart Avenue from Clark Street to Ramona Boulevard to be upgraded to 8 -inch ST as shown in Figure 7-1. This is the only upgrade recommended for the existing wa"er infrastructure. VCWD will evaluate all new development that will occur In the future using a more detailed hydraulic analysis. The VCWD analysis will supersede the recommendations herein, and VCWD will ultimately decide whether the water system infrastructure is required to be upgraded. C. Sewer System The sewer lines serving the Specific Plan area are owned and maintained by the City of Baldwin Park Department of Public Works, with the exception of the 15 -inch Bald- win Park trunk sewer, which is owned and maintained by the Los Angeles County Sanitation District. The sewer lines within the area are mainly Vitrified Clay Pipes (VCP), mostly 8 inches In diameter. The sewer lines are all under the major streets with smaller lateral lines connecting directly to the residential building or businesses (Figure 7-1). There are two major sewer trunk lines within the Specific Plan area, one of them is the 15 -inch VCP In Maine and Pacific Avenues, and the other is the 15 -inch VCP in Baldwin Park Boulevard. Both sewer trunk lines flow from north to south. Using the Zoning Coefficient for sewer area study developed by Los Angeles County Depart- ment of Public Works Land Development Division, the cumulative increase of sewage flow affecting the 15 -inch VCP on Maine and Pacific Avenues after the development is estimated to be 0.064 cis. The cumulative increase after development affecting the 15-nch VCP in Baldwin Park Boulevard Is estimated to be 0.028 cis. Base on the small amount of increase, the sewertrunk lines will not require any upgrades to accommo- date the new development. Furthermore, the rest of the sewer mains are 8 inches In diameter or larger, which are more than adequate to handle the increased sewage discharge created by the new development. It is recommended that the City's Department of Public Works would require a de- tailed sewer area study when the individual developer is planning new construction in the Specific Plan area. The area studies will provide a better and more detailed under- standing of the impact of the new development to the existing sewer infrastructure. The Los Angeles County Sanitation District will be involved in reviewing all new sewer infrastructure upgrades as the City's Department of Public Works will be sending new or updated tentative tract or parcel maps for the district to review. Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 7 Infrastructure 123 D. Storm Drain System The storm drain system serving the Specific Plan area is maintained by the Los Angeles County Flood Control District (LACFCD). The storm drain system within the Specific Plan area consists of mostly underground Reinforced Concrete Pipes (RCP) ranging from 36 to 63 inches (Figure 7-1). The proposed development in the Specific Plan area will generate little or no increase In the runoff to the existing drainage system, since more than 90% of the existing Spe- cific Plan area Is already Impervious. It Is predicted that the new development will not directly trigger any need for upgrading the City's existing storm drain major backbone facilities. In addition, the requirements for percolation and on-site detention for new development will stabilize and/or even reduce runoff in the area. At the present time, there are no plans to upgrade the existing storm drain system within the Specific Plan area. LID Practices and Project Requirements Since January 20, 2005, the State Water Resource Control Board of California (SWRCB) adopted a sustainable practice called Low Impact Development (LID) that would ben- efit the water supply and contribute to water quality protection for the region. Unlike traditional storm water management, which collects and conveys storm water runoff through storm drains, pipes, or other conveyances to a centralized storm water facil- ity, LID takes a different approach by using site design and storm water management to maintain the site's pre -development runoff rates and volumes. The goal of LID is to mimic a site's pre -development hydrology by using design techniques that infiltrate, filter, store, evaporate, and detain runoff close to the source of rainfall. The ten LID practices are: 1) Bioretention & Rain Gardens 2) Rooftop Gardens 3) Sidewalk Storage 4) Vegetated Swales, Buffers & Strips; Tree Preservation 5) Roof Leader Disconnection 6) Rain Barrels and Cisterns 7) Permeable Pavers 8) Soil Amendments 9) Impervious Surface Reduction & Disconnection 10) Pollution Prevention & Good Housekeeping All new development In the Specific Plan area will require preparation of a hydrology study to demonstrate that building sites are free from flooding hazard. All new devel- 124 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park opment will be required to mimic the site's pre -development runoff by choosing the appropriate LID practice most suitable for the site. A proposed project must demon- strate that any proposed improvement, including filling, does not raise the flood level upstream or downstream of the project. In addition, National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) reports, such as the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), Standard Urban Stormwater Management Plan (SUSMP), and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), will be required from the developer for each new development to ensure the quality of water Is preserved and adverse environmental impacts are minimized. E. Electrical System Southern California Edison (SCE), an independently owned utility, provides electrical power service to the City of Baldwin Park. SCE sets their own service standards (with the involvement of the Public Utilities Commission) and facility improvement strate- gies. Currently, there is a network of power grid lines that supply sufficient electrical power service to the Specific Plan area. There Is no major deficiency or functional problem In the power supply facilities within the Specific Plan area. The specific lo- cations of the existing underground and overhead electrical lines are illustrated In Figure 7-2. With the coordination of the City, the decision to upgrade the power supply facilities and the number of the upgrades (if any) to meet the demand of future development will be decided by SCE after developers have submitted their building plans. Demand for services and the ability to serve new developments are generally determined on a case-by-case basis. At this point, there are no recommendations for any major up- grades to the existing power supply facilities in the Specific Plan area. It is important for developers to note that SCE has developed several energy -effi- ciency programs for residential, non-residential, new construction and low-income subscribers. These programs include rebates and cash incentives for completion of energy -efficiency projects in residences and businesses, providing energy-efficient solutions for new developments as well as programs that aid low-income customers to purchase energy-efficient refrigerators and outdoor lighting. SCE will continue to promote the resourceful use of energy, and in tum, a reduction in electrical use and electricity. All new development will be required to place the power and telecom- munication services underground. F. Natural Gas System The Southern California Gas Company/Sempra Utilities (The Gas Company) is the gas service provider for the Specific Plan area. Currently the gas pipelines are in aA major streets in the area, specific locations of gas pipelines are illustrated in Figure 7-2. Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 7 Infrastructure 125 The Gas Company is an public utility company; therefore the analysis on the capac- ity and capability to meet future demand will be conducted by The Gas Company with coordination with the City upon submittal of building plans by developers. It Is important for developers to note that The Gas Company participates in the California Energy Star• New Homes Program Version 3, a performance-based program that pro- vides builders with incentives for developments that use at least 15% less energy than the California 2008 Building Energy Efficiency Standards. G. Telecommunications System The City of Baldwin Park is within the service area of Verizon Communications, a pri- vately owned company. Verizon is the provider of both local and long distance tele- communications in the Specific Plan area (Figure 7-2). Currently the local telecom- munications network lacks the high speed internet service that will be demanded by existing and future businesses in the area. Verizon Communications will assess the demand for services and the ability to serve new developments on a case-by-case basis. The capacity and capability analysis for meeting future demand within the Specific Plan area will be conducted after building plans are submitted by developers. An upgrade of the existing telecommunications Infrastructure to have the capability of providing high speed Internet for future de- velopments will include the placing the aerial telecommunication lines underground, and providing fiber optic cables to replace of copper conduits. Verizon Communications will coordinate with the electrical service supplier (SCE) to share the utility trenching cost by utilizing a joint trench. In most cases, SCE will dic- tate the layout of the trench, and the telecommunication lines would follow. H. Cable Television System The cable service provider for this area is Time Warner Cable. Most of the existing cable TV systems within the Specific Plan area are aerial facilities that share the power poles with the electrical system with a few existing underground conduits (Figure 7-2). New land uses resulting from the Specific Plan will consist of both commercial and resi- dential development, therefore high speed internet and cable television services will be in demand. Similar to telecommunications system, Time Warner Cable will assess the demand for services on a case-by-case basis and ultimately make the decisions con- cerning upgrades for the existing cable TV systems to meet the demand of the future developments. Also similar to telecommunications system, cable TV will most likely coordinate with SCE to conduct joint trenching, if new underground infrastructure Is warranted, in order to lower the cost. Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 7 Infrastructure 127 T Intentionally left blan,k 128 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park Implementation A. Introduction The Downtown Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Specific Plan identifies a number of public infrastructure improvements, including pedestrian linkages, streetscape and circulation elements that are critical to achieving the vision of Downtown becoming an attractive center that attracts residents and visitors not only from within Baldwin Park, but also throughout the region. In order to improve the City's fiscal position, the Downtown revitalization strategy seeks to leverage existing assets to promote pedestrian traffic and downtown development, and balance public and private investments critical to the successful transition of the Downtown. Successful revitalization of Downtown relies on a combination of economic development sfirategles and land use regulations that that will transform &1s area Into a thriving mixed-use urban village. The implementation measures identified in this chapter are intended to guide City staff, property owners, developers and decision -makers to ensure that an adequate infrastructure system is in place for future development and to enhance the long- term fiscal and financial viability of the area. B. Implementation Strategy Typical of many older downtown areas, Downtown Baldwin Park has a diversity of parcel sizes and ownerships with relatively little vacant land or open space available. Much of the revitalization In the Downtown wIU require some land assemblage, and on sites with multiple private owners, redevelopment tends to be more long- term (10+ years). In the short-term (0-5 years) to mId-term (5-10 years), however, there is significant opportunity for Infill development on several key City -owned and/ or Successor Agency -owned parcels. These sites also offer the potential for public- private partnerships to generate new development. Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 8 Implementation 129 Though the responsibility of much of the development in the Specific Plan will. fall to the private sector, there are a number of public Improvements identified as well. All of the improvements contribute to the long-term vision for Downtown Baldwin Park. Because market factors and implementation logistics make it impossible to implement all of the proposed improvements at once, early resources and actions must be directed towards actions that will make the most tangible difference and spur private investment. It is anticipated that initial public Investment will be focused on the proposed civic park. The City has prioritized this project and conceptual design of the park has already occurred. This public investment can be used to leverage improvements of existing business adjacent to the park. Simultaneous with the civic park development, Improvements to Ramona Boulevard will greatly improve pedestrian mobility in the Downtown, enhancing the value which a potential future developer assigns to the area. 1. Infrastructure Financing An infrastructure financing plan is designed to ensure that an adequate infrastructure system is In place for future development in the Downtown area and accomplishes the following: • Establishes capital costs and requires new development to contribute its fair share of the cost of on- and off-site public infrastructure through development impact fees. • Establishes operations and maintenance costs and ensures that new development covers the operations and maintenance costs, either through locally generated public revenues or through the application of various financing techniques to cover any ongoing deficits when other public revenues are not sufficient. This may Include various combinations of techniques, such as landscape and lighting districts, Mello -Roos CFD special taxes, and a property -based business Improvement district. • Considers innovative financing mechanisms, including, but not limited to, establishing Community Facilities Districts (CFDs), Special Assessment Districts, Development Impact Fees and inclusion of the Specific Plan Infrastructure Improvements in the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to fund necessary public facilities and infrastructure. • Considers available State, Federal and regional funding sources to finance infrastructure costs. • Once demand for more parking develops, considers the creation of a Parking District. A parking district plan should balance the development goals of the Specific Plan area with the city's ability to Increase its fiscal position. 130 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park The first step of implementation for the City should be to develop an infrastructure financing plan, as outlined above. Implementation of a financing plan ensures that new development will construct facilities to meet the service level specifications identified in the Downtown, and that new development pays for its fair share of the public infrastructure and other public facilities required to serve the Specific Plan area, as well as for ongoing operations and maintenance. Since individual areas of the Specific Plan may develop at different times, and it is anticipated that the infrastructure and available funding sources will change as development occurs, the financing plan will need to be updated periodically as modifications to financing programs, land uses, and cost estimates for infrastructure and public facilities occur. Changes in the financing plan should be re-evaluated within the context of the overall financing strategy to ensure required funding is available when needed. The costs and funding sources will also need to be adjusted periodically to reflect inflation costs overtime. In summary, possible changes to the financing plan Include: 1) new or revised infrastructure projects; 2) new cost information based on actual construction costs or updated engineering estimates; 3) changes to operations and maintenance costs; 4) new funding source data; and 5) inflationary adjustments to cost data. 2. Implementation Strategy Steps The following steps, as summarized in Table 8-1, are specified to facilitate the orderly development of the Downtown: a) Administrative • Forma committee of City, property and business owners, and development representatives. • Initiate a petition to prepare a property -based Business Improvement District (BID), which Is a powerful public-private partnership tool that allows for a tax or fee self-assessment on property within a defined area. Revenues from the property assessment can finance a wide range of services within the area, Including construction and maintenance of streetscape Improvement and pedestrian linkages, facade improvements, security, marketing, and special events. Some of these services would likely need additional funding support through grants and other sources. • Identify the responsible agency or entity for each infrastructure or service category. • Prepare a set of performance indicators to monitor ongoing fiscal health of Downtown developments. b) Infrastructure Financing • Prepare and finalize the cost estimates of the infrastructure to be paid by development. Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 8 Implementation 131 Table 8-1: Economic Implementation Plan for the Downtown MD Specific Plan M.W"N . . WA7x sof h : 0 132 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park •. .• ponsibility mid- long-term) �ources Public Infrastructure Civic Plaza City short-term Grant and CIP Street Improvements/Markings/Signals City short-term Dev. Impact Fees Underground Fiber Optic Cables Franchisee short-term Assessment .............. ------ Operations and Maintenance _._ _ .,........... ......... ............ Landscaping and beautification City ongoing Assessment Street Improvements/Markings/Signals City ongoing Road Fund Streets and Roads City ongoing Road Fund ................ Cit -Owned Parkin City -Owned g Structure ®, , Parking Garage Construction City long-term Dev. Impact Fees; Parking Revenues & Parking Garage Maintenance City long-term Assessments; BID & City Parking Management Plan City long-term Contribution ,,,,.,. ........ ........... ................. ......... ......... Land Assembly ----- ._ .... Fee or other incentives City mid-term Private Land Owners/Developers ® ®., ............ __ Business Improvement District _,. ......... ......... Setting up a Property -BID Property Owners short-term Assessments Administration Property Owners short-term Assessments Marketing Plan Property Owners short-term Assessments Establishing Role of BID Property Owners short-term Assessments M.W"N . . WA7x sof h : 0 132 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park • Prepare engineer's report that establishes the approved spread of infrastructure costs among approved land uses for development impact fees. • Identify revenues from existing development impact fees already established, including storm drain and traffic congestion relief fees, parkland dedication fees, and in -lieu public art fees. • Establish transportation development impact fee: — Identify any revenues from regional or sub -regional transportation fee programs already established; — Spread the net transportation costs on a trip related methodology; — Estimate the fair share amount by land use; — Adopt a development impact fee (DIF) schedule to be implemented. • Establish landscaping and lighting assessments: — In order to allow for the timely provision of landscape and lighting improvements, identify the appropriate financing mechanism, such as a landscape and lighting district (LIVID) assessment; — Establish the LMD with a majority landowners vote overthe properties with the Specific Plan area; — As facilities are required, use LIVID bonding authority to provide for landscape and lighting infrastructure financing; — Provide for reimbursement program to developer from future DIFs if developer finances facilities beyond their fair share. • For other facilities that serve the entire Specific Plan area, such as undergrounding fiber optic cable for N: Establish an assessment that will spread the costs on a fair share basis to the respective properties; — Provide for reimbursement program to developer from future DIFs if developer finances facilities beyond their fair share; For properties that benefit from improvements beyond the Specific Plan boundaries, such as landscaping and road improvements, allocate their fair share to these properties. c) Land Assembly Incentives • Provide for development fee incentives, or other incentives, that encourage private landowners to work cooperatively in assembling smaller parcels of contiguous land into larger, more efficiently developable land. The ownership pattern may provide opportunities for multiple property owners to share ideas and information, thereby potentially reducing individual cost and effort. There are also potential benefits in joint development and/or developing complementary projects. d) Parking Management Plan • Develop a parking management plan that will facilitate the development and maintenance of parking facilities overtime using a variety of funding sources, including: development impact fees; assessments; parking revenue; and public contributions. Public Review Draft - December 2014 Chapter 8 Implementation 133 • Update the Inventory of existing parking spaces at the time of development of the parking management plan. • As parking demand necessitates, convert the City -owned public parking lot on Laurens Avenue Into structured parking to serve Downtown in a central location. e) Maintain Fiscal Balance • Develop fiscal performance Indicators that can be easily tracked over time. • If annual recurring fiscal balance Is sufficient, consider using some of the net surplus to leverage private sector investment in Downtown. • Encourage public -public and public-private partnerships, particularly on parcels where the City and/or Successor Agency owns the land and on excess right-of-way. f) Marketing/Branding Downtown • In cooperation with the Baldwin Park Business Association, business improvement district (If established), and other stakeholders, develop marketing program for the Downtown. • Hire branding consultant to assist in a branding/marketing program for Downtown. 134 Downtown TOD Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park ATTAC. UMIENT #2 VICINITY MAP VICINITY MAP LOCATION: The City's Downtown area (Central Business District) generally bounded by La Rica Avenue to the West, Clark Street to the north, Park n Ride Lot to the East and Downing Avenue to the south. CASE NUMBER: SP 15-01 October 27, 2015 Hun OF -r HE ATTACHMENT #2 VCINT MA. VICINITY LOCATION: The City's Downtown area (Central Business District) generally bounded by La Rica Avenue to the West, Clark Street to the north, Park n Ride Lot to the East and Downing Avenue to the south. CASE NUMBER: SP 15-01 :SATE: November 18, 2015 Available r in the office of the C' ATTACHMENT #3 DRAFT ENVIRONENTAL A. _. ACT CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DOWNTOWN TRANSIT -ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) State Clearinghouse No. 201 41 21 098 Prepared for April 2015 City of Baldwin Park Community Development Department CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DOWNTOWN TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) State Clearinghouse No. 2014121098 Prepared for April 2015 City of Baldwin Park Community Development Department 626 Wllshire BoulevaM SUR01 I 100 Los Angeles, CA 00017 213.5599,4300 WWWWWOCICOM OrWyk Pskn Songs peter Kill PoMapid Sa"emento Son L*W, Son Franclsoo Seattle Tampa Woodland Hills TABLE OF CONITENTS Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project Administrative Draft Environmental Impact Report Page ES. Executive Summary.................................................................................................. ES -1 ES.1 Introduction........................................................................................................ ES -1 ES.2 Project Description............................................................................................. ES -1 ES.3 Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures...,. ES -2 ESAAlternatives......................................................................................................... ES -2 1. Introduction ...................................... ........... ............... ................. . .............. ....1-1 1.1 Purpose of an EIR................................................................................................1-1 2.5 1.2 Project Overview ..................... ............................ ..................................................1-2 ................. .............. 2-21 1.3 The CEQA EIR Process ................... .......... ........ ....... ........ ........... ....,.,.........,.........1-3 1.4 Public Review of the Draft EIR. ......., ... ....,.., ................. ,,,.1-5 1.5 Organization of this Draft EIR.. ........ ......... ......... ......... .......... .... ,..,.....1-6 2. Project Description.................................................... 2.1 Introduction......................................................... ......................a...,,.......... ........... ,.... 2-1 2.2 Project Location and Plan Area Characteristics .... ....... .................... ................ ..... 2-1 2.3 Project Characteristics .......................................... ........... ....................... ............ 2-10 2.4 Project Goals and Objectives................................................................. ............2-21 2.5 Reviews and Approvals ............................................ ........... ................. .............. 2-21 2.6 Cumulative Projects.............................................................. ..............................2-22 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3.1 Aesthetics..........................................................................................................3.1-1 3.2 Air Quality..........................................................................................................3.2-1 3.3 Cultural Resources............................................................................................ 3.3-1 3.4 Greenhouse Gases ........................................................ 3.5 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ................................. ............................. .......3.5-1 3.6 Hydrology and Water Quality ......................................... ...................... ............... 3.6-1 3.7 Land Use........................................................................................................... 3.7-1 3.8 Noise.................................................................................................................3.8-1 3.9 Population and Housing....................................................................................3.9-1 3.10 Public Services.................................................................................................3.10-1 3.11 Transportation and Traffic.................................................................................3.11-1 3.12 Utility Services................................................................................................. 3.12-1 4. Alternatives 4.1 CEQA Requirements ............... ......... ......... ....4-1 Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project I' ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 1010���� 4.2 Project Alternatives ........................... --...... ---_--........... ...... ... —_—.4-4 4.3 Environmentally Superior AJtenlaUve—................... —...... ....... __—............... 4-24 5. QtherCEQA Considerations ..................................... ____...... ________..... 5-1 61 Direct and Indirect Growth Inducement .............. _~--___—_-----..... 5-1 62 Significant |rn*voruib|m Environmental Changes- ... ........ —........... ___... ... .5-4 6. Report P ...... ...... --- ... ........... -----------.................. ... —....... 8-1 Baldwin Park TOmSpecific Plan Project " ESA/D1 30953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2016 11111171*1 Appendices Appendix A: Initial Study, Notice of Preparation, NOP Mailing List, and Scoping Comments Appendix B: Air Quality Study Appendix C: GHG Study Appendix D: Traffic Study Page Figures 2-1 Regional Location ................................................ .............................. ........... .......... 2-2 2-2 Specific Plan Area .................................................... ......... ..................................... 2-4 2-3 Existing Land Uses within the Specific Plan Area ................ ................ --- ...... ....... 2-6 2-4 Existing General Plan Land Uses ....................................... ...................... ............... 2-8 2-5 Existing Zoning.......................................................... .............................................. 2-9 2-6 Proposed Zoning.......................................................................w...,......,,,..,...........2-12 2-7 Urban Design Framework ..................................... ......................... ............... ......... 2-13 2-8 Proposed Circulation System ............................... .................................... ..............2-16 2-9 Proposed Pedestrian Circulation Network............................................................... 2-18 2-10 Proposed Bicycle Circulation Network ................. ............... ............................. ...... 2-20 2-11 Related Projects .............................................. ......... -.... ......2-25 3.1-1 Existing Setting Photos ............................................. 3.1-2 Existing Setting Photos ............................................ ............................................. 3.1-4 3.1-3 Existing Setting Photos............................................................. ........ ............... ..... 3.1-6 3.1-4 Existing Setting Photos ................................................... .............................. ........3.1-7 3.1-5 Existing Setting Photos ........................................ --......................... ............... .,.... 3.1-9 3.6-1 Specific Plan Area Drainage ................................ ........................... ........................ 3.6-3 3.8-1 Effects of Noise on People......................................................m,....,..,....,.,..a,..,..,.,.3.8-2 3.2-31 3.8-2 Noise Monitoring Locations...................................................................................3.8-8 3.2-31 3.12-1 Existing Wet Utilities in Specific Plan Area ........... ......... .......... ....... ....................3.12-2 Tables ES -1 Change In Development Capacity...................................................................... ES -2 ES -2 Summary Of Impacts And Mitigation Measures .............................................-.. ES -5 2-1 Existing Land Uses within the Specific Pan Area ............................................ ....... 2-5 2-2 General Plan Land Uses within the Specific Plan Area..........................................2-7 2-3 Existing Zoning within the Specific Plan Area...........................................................2-7 2-4 Change in Development Capacity.........................................................................2-11 2-5 Summary of Specific Plan Zoning and General Plan Land Use Amendments ..... 2-11 2-6 Related Project List.............................................................................................. 2-24 3.2-1 Ambient Air Quality Standards for Criteria Pollutants .......................................... 3.2-3 3.2-2 Air Quality Data Summary (2009-2013) for the Project Site and Its Vicinity........ 3.2-7 3.2-3 South Coast Air Basin Attainment Status............................................................3.2-8 3.2-4 SCAQMD Significance Thresholds....................................................................3.2-15 3.2-5 SCAQMD Localized Significance Thresholds ................................................- 3.2-16 3.2-6 Unmitigated Construction Emissions.............................................................. ...3.2-24 3.2-7 Mitigated Construction Emissions...................................................................-3.2-26 3.2-8 Localized Pollutant Concentrations from Construction Emissions ..................... 3.2-29 3.2-9 Localized Pollutant Concentrations from Mitigated Construction Emissions-- 3.2-29 3.2-10 Unmitigated Operational Emissions.................................................................. 3.2-31 3.2-11 Localized Pollutant Concentrations from Net Operational Emissions ................ 3.2-31 3.2-12 Peak Hourly Traffic Volumes............................................................................. 3.2-32 3.3-1 Historic Resources within the Specific Plan Area ................................................ 3.3-4 Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project I..d ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3.3-2 Properties Reviewed for Potential Historic Resources in the SpecificPlan Area............................................................................... 3.3-3 Cultural Resources Studies Conducted within the Planning Area............ 3.4-1 Estimated Total Construction -Related GHG Emissions ........................... 3.5-2 Estimated Construction and Operations -Related GHG Emissions........... 3.6-1 Beneficial Uses of Water Bodies in the Vicinity of the Specific Plan Area 3.6-2 TMDLs for Water Bodies in the Vicinity of the Specific Plan Area............ 3.6-3 Minimum BMPs for Construction Sites ..................................................... 3.6-4 Typical Source Control Best Management Practices ............................... 3.6-5 Typical Treatment Control Best Management Practices .......................... 3.7-1 Specific Plan Area Existing Land Uses .................................................... 3.7-2 Consistency of Proposed Project with SCAG Policies .............................. 3.7-3 Consistency of Proposed Project with Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan Policies................................................................................................ ... 3.3-6 3.3-18 .......3.4-12 3.4-13 ...,,...3.6-5 ... 3.6-5 3.6-11 3.6-20 3.6-21 ... 3.7-2 3.7-12 3.8-1 Summary of Long-term Noise Measurements ............................................... 3.8-2 Summary of Short-term Noise Measurements .............................................. 3.8-3 Existing Roadway Noise Levels.................................................................... 3.8-4 Construction Vibration Damage Criteria........................................................ 3.8-5 Community Noise Exposure (Ldn or CNEL).................................................. 3.8-6 Noise/Land Use Compatibility Matrix............................................................. 3.8-7 Receiving Noise Standards(dBA)................................................................. 3.8-8 Exterior Noise Standards.............................................................................. 3.8-9 Typical Construction Noise Levels................................................................ 3.8-10 Typical Noise Levels from Construction Equipment ...................................... 3.8-11 Future (2035) With Project Roadway Noise Levels ....................................... 3.8-12 Vibration Source Levels for Construction Equipment .................................... 3.8-13 Roadway Noise Levels with Project.............................................................. 3.8-14 Cumulative Roadway Noise Impacts............................................................. 3.9-1 Historical Population Growth for City of Baldwin Park and Los Angeles County (1990 - 2035).......................................................... 3.9-2 Housing Stock Characteristics in the City Of Baldwin Park and Los Angeles County, 2000 and 2013 ........................................................ 3.9-3 New Residential Housing Units with Building Permits In Baldwin Park (2000 -2006) ........................................................................................... 3.9-4 Population, Households and Jobs Projections for Baldwin Park and the San Gabriel Valley Subregion, 2008 to 2035 ............................................ 3.10-1 Parkland by Category within Baldwin Park .................................................... 3.10-2 Los Angeles County Regional Parks............................................................. 3.10-3 Existing Capacity of Public Schools Serving the Specific Plan Area ............. 3.10-4 BPUSD Student Generation Factors............................................................. 3.10-5 Remaining School Capacity at Build Out of Specific Plan ............................. 3.11-1 Definitions for Intersection Level of Service ................................................. 3.11-2 Existing Conditions Intersection Level of Service ......................................... 3.11-3 Trip Generation By Land Use....................................................................... 3.11-4 Summary of Existing AM and PM Peak Hour Levels of Service and Volume to Capacity Ratios or Average Delay ........................................................ 3.11-1 Summary of Future 2035 AM and PM Peak Hour Levels of Service and Volume to Capacity Ratios or Average Delay ........................................... 3.12-1 Current and Projected VCWD Water Supply Sources ................................... 3.12-2 Actual VCWD Water Deliveries from 2008 through 2010 .............................. 3.12-3 Projected VCWD Water Deliveries From 2015 through 2035 ........................ 3.12-4 Existing Water Demand in Specific Plan Area ............................................... ..... 3.8-6 3.8-7 3.8-9 3.8-12 3.8-14 3.8-17 3.8-19 3.8-24 ,..3.8-25 ... 3.8-28 ... 3.8-31 ... 3.8-35 3.8-41 3.9-1 3.9-2 3.9-3 ..... 3.9-4 ... 3.10-3 ... 3.10-4 .3.10-10 .3.10-10 .3.10-11 ...3.11-6 ... 3.11-7 .3.11-15 .3.11-17 .3.11-19 ... 3.12-4 3.12-5 ... 3.12-6 Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project Iv ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3.12-5 Existing Wastewater Generation in the Specific Plan Area ................................3.12-9 3.12-6 Estimated Solid Waste Generation from Existing Land Uses within the Specific Plan Area...................................................................................... 3.12-10 3.12-7 Existing and Proposed Water demand in Specific Plan Area .......................... 3.12-16 3.12-8 Estimated Increase in Wastewater Generation ...............................................3.12-17 3.12-9 Existing and Projected Demand, Supplies, and Availble Supplies .................. 3.12-19 3.12-10 Solid Waste Generation from Proposed and Existing Land Uses ...................3.12-20 4-1 No Project Alternative Difference In Development At Build Out ..................... ........ 4-5 4-2 Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative Difference In Development At Build Out..................................................................................................................... 4-6 4-3 Reduced Development Alternative Difference In Development At Build Out..........4-6 4-4 Comparison Of Alternatives To Proposed Specific Plan Project ....................... .- 4-2.6 Baldwin Park TOD Specific Pian Project v ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 Table of Contents Acronyms ACMs Asbestos -containing materials ADOE Archaeological Determination of Eligibility list ADT average daily traffic AFY acre-feet per year ANSI American National Standards Institute AQMP air quality management plan AR4 Fourth Assessment Report ARC Arts and Recreation Center ASHRAE Society of Heating , Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers ASTs aboveground storage tanks B. P. Before Present BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District BMPs best management practices BPPD Baldwin Park Police Department BPUSD Baldwin Park Unified School District CAA Clean Air Act Cal/EPA California Environmental Protection Agency Cal/OSHA California Division of Occupational Safety and Health CARB California Air Resources Board CASQA California Stormwater Quality Association CAT Climate Action Team CCAR California Climate Action Registry CCAT California Climate Action Team CCR California Code of Regulations CDMMP Construction and Demolition Materials Management Plan CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CERCLA Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act CERCLIS Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System CERS California Environmental Reporting System CFR Code of Federal Regulations CH4 methane CHHSLs California Human Health Screening Levels CHL California Historical Landmarks CHLs California Historical Landmarks CHRIS California Historical Resources Information System CMP Congestion Management Program CNEL Community Noise Equivalent Level CO carbon monoxide CO2 carbon dioxide CPHI California Points of Historical Interest list CRHR California Register of Historical Resources CUPA Certified Unified Program Agency CUWMPA California Urban Water Management Planning Act CWA Clean Water Act DHS Department of Health Services DOT Department Of Transportation DTSC Department of Toxic Substances Control DWR Department of Water Resources EDR Environmental Data Resources, Inc. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project VI ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 Table of Contents EIR Environmental Impact Report EPA Environmental Protection Agency ERNS Emergency Response Notification System ESA environmentally sensitive area FTA Federal Transit Administration's GHG greenhouse gas GRIP Groundwater Reliability Improvement Program GWPs global warming potentials HAPs hazardous air pollutants HFCs hydrofluorocarbons HMBP Hazardous Materials Business Plan HRS Hazard Ranking System HUD Housing and Urban Development HVAC Heating, ventilating, and air conditioning 1-10 Interstate -1 0 1-210 Interstate -210 1-605 Interstate 605 IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change LACFD Los Angeles County Fire Department LACSD Los Angeles County Sanitation District LADPW Los Angeles County Department of Public Works LAEDC Los Angeles County Economic Development Corporation LARWQCB Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board LCFS low carbon fuel standard LID Low Impact Development LOS Level of Service LSTs localized significance thresholds LUST leaking underground storage tank MACT Maximum Achievable Control Technology MEP maximum extent practicable MERV minimum efficiency reporting value MMT million metric tons MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization MPOs metropolitan planning organizations MSGBW Main San Gabriel Basin Watermaster MT metric ton MTA Metropolitan Transportation Authority MU -1 Mixed Use MWD Metropolitan Water District N20 nitrous oxide NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards NAHC Native American Heritage Commission NALs numeric action levels NDMA N-nitrosodimethylamine NFRAP No Further Remedial Action Planned NH3 ammonia NHM Natural History Museum NHPA National Historic Preservation Act NO nitric oxide NO2 nitrogen dioxide NOP Notice of Preparation NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project Vii ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 m NPL National Priorities List NRHP National Register of Historic Places 03 ozone OES Office of Emergency Services OPR Office of Planning and Research OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration OSWER Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response PCBs polychlorinated biphenyls PCE perchloroethylene PFCs perfluorocarbons PHI Points of Historical Interest PM10 Respirable Particulate Matter PM2.5 Fine Particulate Matter PPCTM Public Protection Classification PPV peak particle velocity PVC polyvinyl chloride RCP Reinfqrced Concrete Pipes RCPG Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act RHNA Regional Housing Needs Assessment RMS root mean square ROGs reactive organic gases ROW right-of-way ROWD report of waste discharge RTIP Regional Transportation Improvement Program RTP Regional Transportation Plan RTP/SCS Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board's SAR Second Assessment Report SARA Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act SB Senate Bill SCAB South Coast Air Basin SCAG Southern California Association of Governments SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District SCCIC South Central Coastal Information Center SCCIC South Central Coastal Information Center SCS sustainable communities strategies SF6 sulfur hexafluoride SIC Standard Industrial Classification SIP State Implementation Plan SJCWRP Water Reclamation Plant (WRP) SLF Sacred Lands Files SO2 sulfur dioxide SO3 sulfur trioxide SO4 sulfates SPCC Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plan SRA Source Receptor Area SVP Society of Vertebrate Paleontology SWPPP Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board TACs toxic air contaminants TCE trichloroethene Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project VIII ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 M TDM Transportation Demand Management TMDLs Total Maximum Daily Loads TOD Transit -Oriented Design TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act UNFCCC United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change UPRR Union Pacific Railroad USEPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency USTs underground storage tanks UWMP Urban Water Management Plan V/C volume -to -capacity VCP Vitrified Clay Pipe VCWD Valley County Water District VM Volume VMT vehicle miles travelled VOCs volatile organic compounds WPA Works Progress Administration WQBELs water -quality based effluent limitations WRP Water Reclamation Plant WWII World War II Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project IX ESA ( D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 This Executive Summary provides a brief summary of the Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan Project Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR). This summary outlines the project description, the potential impacts of the proposed Specific Plan, and proposed alternatives to the proposed Specific Plan. This summary also provides a summary table of all potential impacts and mitigation measures identified in this EIR. With the adoption of the Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan in 2002 and recent zoning code update, the City re-established its commitment to a pedestrian core for the Downtown, as well as a new Mixed -Use General Plan land use designation for this area. The proposed Specific Plan has been developed with the overarching intent of introducing a transit -oriented development pattern to the 115 acre Specific Plan area. The Specific Plan would guide future development of the Downtown area to generate a walkable transit -oriented environment that is proximate to the Metrolink Station and that would provide improved access to all modes of transportation, including transit, walking and bicycling. The proposed Specific Plan is intended to provide opportunities to build on the City's unique historic and cultural characteristics to enhance the Downtown core; take advantage of the location of the Metrolink Station and access to regional transit; create a strong community identity and sense of place; provide new employment, housing and shopping opportunities; and strengthen the City's tax base. Opportunities exist within walking distance of the Metrolink Station to provide for infill development and adaptive reuse of existing under-utilized structures to better serve the transit -oriented Downtown area and generate new investment. The proposed Specific Plan is intended to guide future development of mixed uses in a walkable environment, streamline the development process, and serve as an incentive for economic development. Table ES -1 shows the change in development capacity that would result from build out of the proposed Specific Plan. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project ES -1 ESA 0 D130953 Administrative Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 Executive Su TABLE ES -1 CHANGE IN DEVELOPMENT CAPACITY Residential Non -Residential Units (SF) Existing Development 101 886,538 Build out of S ecific Plan Zonin 934 1,175,673 Total Increase 833 289,135 SOURCE: The Arroyo Group, 2014, ES.3 Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures The potential environmental impacts of the project are summarized in Table ES -2 at the end of this section. This table lists impacts and mitigation measures in three major categories: significant impacts that would remain significant even with mitigation, significant impacts that could be mitigated to a level of less -than -significant, and impacts that would not be significant. For each significant impact, the table includes a summary of the mitigation measure(s) and an indication of whether the impact would be mitigated to a less -than -significant level. ES.4 Alternatives The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that a reasonable range of project alternatives be discussed in an EIR. This EIR identifies and analyzes such a reasonable range of alternatives, identifies the environmental effects of each alternative, and compares environmental effects of each alternative with the effects of the proposed Specific Plan project. The alternatives consist of the following: Alternative 1: No Project Alternative (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) Under Alternative 1, the Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan would not be approved and no associated components identified under the proposed Specific Plan would be implemented. This alternative would not include development of a new Arts Park across from City Hall or provide the circulation or streetscape changes that would occur by under the proposed Specific Plan. Pursuant to the existing General Plan and zoning, some intensification of development and some new mixed use uses would occur, but the resulting development of new land uses under this alternative would be less than build out of the proposed Specific Plan. The No Project alternative would result in a total of 603 residential units and 1,149,222 square feet of non-residential development at build out; which is 331 fewer residential units and 26,451 fewer square feet of non-residential space than build out of the proposed Specific Plan. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project ES -2 ESA / D130953 Administrative Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 l '! • " q -= Alternative 2, the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative, would include a smaller Specific Plan area. Under this alternative the Specific Plan area would be reduced by a total of 20.48 acres, from 115 acres to 94.52 acres. The Industrial Commercial area in the northeastern portion of the Specific Plan area that is proposed for continued Industrial Commercial uses would not be included in the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative because industrial related land uses are not consistent with residential mixed uses, which are the preferred land uses within a TOD. In addition, the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative would not include the proposed residential uses within 500 feet of the Metrolink rail line and station that would be designated for additional residential uses by the proposed Specific Plan. The non-residential uses included in the proposed Specific Plan that are within 500 feet of the Metrolink line would be developed consistent with the proposed Specific Plan. Like the proposed Specific Plan, the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative would provide an Art's Park, active storefronts, pedestrian nodes with amenities such as street furniture, and lighting. In addition, this alternative would implement all of the circulation improvements that are proposed as part of the Specific Plan. This alternative would result in 130 fewer residential units and 27,217 less non-residential square footage at build out compared to the proposed Specific Plan. Alternative 3: Redc v l Alternative Alternative 3, the Reduced Development Alternative, would reduce the overall increase in maximum development allowed under the proposed Specific Plan by 25 percent. This alternative was selected for analysis because a reduced development could avoid or lessen the significant impacts associated with the project, while meeting the objectives of the project. As described in Section 2.0, Project Description, build out of the proposed Specific Plan would result in an increase of 833 residential units and 289,135 square feet of non-residential development. The Reduced Development Alternative would provide an Arts Park, active storefronts, pedestrian nodes with amenities such as street furniture, and lighting; in addition, to all of the circulation improvements that would be implemented by the Specific Plan. Alternative 3 would develop 208 fewer residential units and 72,284 less square feet of non-residential space than the proposed Specific Plan. • . • ' • ':. Chapter 4, Alternatives, compares the environmental impacts of the alternatives relative to the proposed Specific Plan. None of the alternatives would reduce the significant and unavoidable construction related air quality and noise impacts of the proposed Specific Plan to less than significant, although significant impacis would likely be reduced in degree under both Alternatives 2 and 3 because less development would occur under each alternative. Alternative 3, the Reduced Development Alternative, would result in reduced level of impacts to a greater extent because it represents the least amount of development spread over a larger area than Alternative 2, the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative or the proposed Specific Plan. Compared to the project and the alternatives analyzed in this EIR, the Reduced Development Alternative is considered the environmentally superior alternative because it would reduce Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project ES -3 ESA / D130953 Administrative Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 Executive project -related impacts for eight environmental issue areas and achieve the majority of project objectives. However, as described above, Alternative 3, the Reduced Development Alternative would not achieve the objectives of the Specific Plan to the same degree as the proposed Specific Plan. The reduced density and less mixed use development near the near the Metrolink Station compared to the proposed Specific Plan, would not maximize the potential for TOD development within the Downtown area and would be less consistent with the SCAG policies that encourage maximizing opportunities related to TOD and less dependence on the automobile. The objectives of the proposed Specific Plan including increasing housing densities and commercial/retail employment generating uses within walking distance of the Metrolink Station. The Reduced Development Alternative would implement that objective; however, to a lesser degree than the proposed Specific Plan. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project ES -4 ESA / D130953 Administrative Draft Environmental Impact Report April 7,015 U) W w D U) Q W Z O F - Q Nco F- W W Z J Z m Q Q U) F- I -- L) Q 0.. E C O C 0 Ca 2 2 ems) y a CC U N _T U N C O R U id aj R O N N N L UR Nva U 70 .0 N� a) 46 a M — > CL C cu R — N O 0 0 E 3 E 3 U m w >_�� oa R 'a) N aa)) a)a)o w~°�ai a�i�EO E (� H C a) O a C E R N U N U - �� ma o "a ami ���a v CO � 0 '� 2 0 m � N C� Z) N L C Q) R R O N V= t o a E c-0 N d U- L—Co .0 R X y �w Q E U a n � E E E a � N .7 O> > 3 V d N R 3 N N N N N N N E E •.>-. >Roa>c N >��mooa> i W- aN L R aE1= n (D is R R f6 '=" O "" N R '7 N N` N 0 N ai 'C 3 �' L N - u- >, c, E m .. c U a) N a 7 N N 01 R O a o a U` _ N a) N N a) U a) N N N� L O O O U W L R E cd� o ccIL j R O; o N. R= :03) N c O _ n> m d@ m o rn c E nm °=iu.>LR. n00 D)an) a) -6Q a> �a a c wN'� aci y X 7-r N N c 0 a) C p d Q d 0 > .) U 5 o0 c ro �z'5i)' o a) V Z' Ra Ewa) r �_ 2 N— C O C 6 N C O O C R R C O .0 a) U N N— " E O N (D R O 0) Q N N U U'U C C C O` U U R O Q L L '� L 7 C U lD ' N R a w ? w y 'i� a N1) -D_ CE y> R fn W a s 0 0 a 0 a aco�a)a�N o La�O U mca 0 9 O�ETR U 0 E R o R o E E a) a) C3)= O R U N (0 6 '? "" C `) N _ C� O R E O U N N N N I— N p a) > O N i 0 a)I-- co E O U 0 0 0 0 0 4-: cc R m c m EI— R o Co R a U m +'a Z Z Z Z Z E QQ C>LO))0 U) ID Qn �axioko �o T -O f0 m a C O � O 7 O a) L N T N U R U O CO a) a CR R a) .ca a cafa O — O a) (6 C > > U Id as a) 0 _O R co N C L U U O) R O ,L.. O U> T O= U 0 >, C += R C C '� O cco � 1 d) c -a 3 a) — C C N 0 O).L R 6 Ca) R O o) _ O1 R U a) R O coa) C R y a R C N y,N U NU N N a NL U N m M(D a E � o c o mCD 0 W N N E E Q a U a C N a N R -C::` L U N R O � w (6 O C:a) a N 7 �)o 7 2) L o C o R U N N �coE F C O o N O N a) n '01 •— `) . E3: a) -am[6 N C a > L_ C C R R a .y �, a N C R o R N 'i6 3 R O C N a) N o f.t1 > aR R 7 RR >' E 7 cc 0 <° O N— n a) 0 U CIO o n 2 C/)U N U .�+ U T i R O_ 0 ar ©co r r >e} r r •� N N N M .`0-. U O N.— 'ix'v M M O ' C M R M 3 M 6 0 M N M Q '< am LL O Q a c O s C Q E C L) w C T U C ns N J U ` �- U (6 O O a) O C ,LC c a yLQ �o�o�_EEcoiya,om L .,L.. N C O a) N `) a) 0- O Ia L '7 a) >+.O E f0 d L O� Nc� a7 N aY L y s 4.-- y Y c W a .y.. a �e a) c N N N N O.L. L O N A Ew p a) y d f6 L .L.. y N til OU C C m S p` U 0 y a) 8.< w a) a) a) C a (wl> cL y a) L �p O y x N >r C N c y 0 O a) "o l6 "- Co C N S O N y p a) a) n O y 0 O N C '60-6 c L E o > c 'Oy w ,O 0 p a) N O. O— E y U @ N U L c ,; 3' M O O N p C N O C C m N V m y O_ u) co) C >, L L E� 'c N_ 0 0 C O U) c. m o N 0)E E ayiL m O O a> U c 2 O C C O a 2 co �r0+ cu 3 U +L.,, O 7� L'N u) a) U co N O C N •C N p U O U Q N N E o N d 0 a) Ey' c�+ccC) m o o cu U m -2,5)= Na 0a Or.0 , U E U U) a) C c n=r N Q Q 0 +76 UO.. aa>,)NLcu 0. N a o U y 0 y CL U m� 000� >> (0.2 O a y a) � u) O N C1O.91 U C_ d)m > C R j C U O C W N O C CO O a Z6 W c v v iV C M U 4-_0 a U c o m o a) U > CN a7 p 3 U a O_ a ,F C = O W Lr)a) -a o o�� �Y y m aE E NLo,� `� `° Lo c E>=aE �°)Etiim�)c'�Eomco> 0 7 (A C a) -p a >. a) O _C L U C a S a) 3 U C E .0 Q� w2 a) C> U N a N y 0 •.L.+ a s y p] 'C p >, V U (6 L Q 3. N- E j y 0 a5 O a) y 7 . a�'m�E�mW �am�eaaiS2>`n 0 �> .�. m (6 C CO C N p p a `� 01 N y "O a > y aa)i>L 7 c C) 0)M 12 o o� a> o c 0 a0 p 0 N w C U C p a) u) •r� c.2-60— O a) cL0.0 0� m E EWQ� wa c� E E.mt c �G.L-•Lg acL 7 N (6 O. � O N C N O C a) >+ E a CD m w 7 US O C S U a) a y d o N V y a) 0 a) M -O 7 N j C > —'a K C m N Ca a N m M 0� nL C f0 d O U� .... U o C O '- U N p C L O` 'fV t6 . �o .0 L .y Y 7 .� O U U Q T• w C N .0 E_ N O C C C` W f6 U .L... c Q O— (4 a) 2` C w m aoc LoL� E LOO�E' y U .- y 0 O N. N� a a) N � L y X Y >+ L C U O O y 0 N O C y m m mtC °)�'° m K a' E m y y c 3w E Q E I- co > > (D C aci C � a) 0.2 ` c C a� `a) .L.. a) 0 7 m 0 O L O E O y w N '� - y m� a) _ Qua aC O a) O C6 C_ a m ^ N @ O ` 0 0= O O `Oi. C C a6i 00 y m m a`p - a)ooa ) m cQ a)=Q .2-0, �BrnN c Loocu Tm>N> -o0 a) cu��yo � C CU LO m mwch C aMi y 0 m a = aaL>-0 L)Qa> C �ao'L)o0vam $sw O=ioo - cnc- o oa o 0 O O N C m O O U <( 7 y W N C >, 0— (D a � a) E ai U y -0 N N-0 2 a o c E3c0� 0 LL 0 D U) ca W L) C: U) U) C m U) U N W < (L) .2 D 'S -Cc) 0.9 F, p . E �j -, , t ts 0, �,Cn 6 0 2- — c - a) 1? -0 lu 0 0 w 2,�! C: 0 L) CL C>:, ir- 0 =3 C: r ca 0 C: >, m 0-6 iT, -z u C — C6 .0 cu m z cc -D rz m i- c� w _I 0 — -Z5 IL S: E M'5 0 wl U) 0 0) — 0 m L) ca acidC: > -P CD 0 4) C) N 'E U c R E W 71 rn 0 f lit) -2 q C) 05-0 aj E 0 0 C� LU ID 0 .0 0-5 C: M '>—, f>u < ' 0 C: =3 >< — — 0 CU r- 'Q "' 16 :3 (3 � lb W ID a. C/) 0 C (D r- m U L 0 cc' C) la R, o El ce) (D 0 U) C: 2 taA �5 (5 IS "s -�3 121, 21, R- 2 0 U) — 14 C: 00 0 c-, -V ca U) 0 a) C: U —W — — Fm m 0, 0 - M Paj a) US 1� a) M '9 -0 m g, — w, lu -- 5-6 LF m 0 r- 0 ME 0 -, V) , ca a) -C 1 6 - go cl: 10 —0 ID 0 C: 0 ju M 0) T�� `4 -_— , Xa M,—; , (A -6 '- -0 Z' (D W, D r.7, 0 M M 'A 0 co C: U) 0 Q" 0' __j m > q > D —6 V, m m 0 m 0 0 0 >,,R 0 c: �-E C: W Cw COC 3 0 0 w a W, 0— > X (D 0 r� mu> E OF 2 Z E: b E o' Em a) co w '0 ti 0 'Fn (D — O. 0 C, W X U ID O. 0 9 0 'E cc2o —cL '�06 aS (CDL a, > A��2 1, 10 lel- >D �� 2 M to C: 0 0 0 0 �-- 4-- E C: LO lip, tf 'OZ N R C2 0- = 0 a) 0 '— 0 (D � c) w >,.D fu > '(D 'D .2 M a) a, F C: --6 0 V a) Q.0 co m — ja -5 Q (D 2 E c.: 3 'Do -,OD a.) cC t6 'D S, llu 6 o CL .2 a) 0'a -t- z 1 10 u') =3 5 :3 D 0 C6 U C's cr (D f�' -�6 E m ? 0 cu 8 (D C: cr 0' f3 -s ,= -= - 2 C) 2 -@ - =, �O P '25 , , . M 1p . n =3 a) a) -2 0 a) a) a) E 3M 1B V) aj M Z In 10 R a) c C: 0) C: -9 — It 0 0-0 U ir 5 cn -0 C: D 0 0 Lp =3 0 a) z C: '0 0 di C- �j . L 0 9 -a CU) E E Z >m E E"� 2 2 co cLa) L) '0 E (=O' 8, -6 ca. z 0 z Z ca 0 14 C: UC: L) ui C: E a) Mm 0 U) :E5.2 (D a) -0 Z -e z LZ5 U) d) R E 6 0 0 (D LE 0 t w (D CD m E 0m . CU w U 0 0 0 E 0 .2 Ch 0 a) a) U) N > I CL (n > U) 0) -0 a) (D U) 2 co C: CO a) .2 0 — .— -ffi - CON C) cu m 0 ca to (D 0 -0-0 M U) ca 0 co Ca cLa a) is a) (D a)E —0 m cu r E 0 U L) 0. C) —CES 7 t7 'a C3 �i Esc— v -�: 2 �i 0 0 ci -Fu M V) 0 cu u Vi 0 0 Cc (u CL E CL 0 0. CL m E CL• E 0 E 0 W LL D U W O Ix a z O z O 0 Y Q a z d� O J C m a O = F- N � W OLL LLI U) m � D W 2 z _O Q Z Q U n 2 LL O Q D U) c t0+ U ,a R - U:. uj W d R a) v c R U w C CA N CD 00 N LU CD a a a a a a a a a a a LU c O 6 5 6 Q •9 6 '5 6 9 O' 5 O' •5 Q '5 6 9 Q Q R a) C a) C a) C a) C a) C N C a) C () C a) c a) C a) C w O z O z O z O z O z O Z O z O Z O z O z O z o R [0 N L O) C C N O N N m O C C (0 () L C0,5 w 1. o 0 ovi E0E O o =3 � R R on R N �o$o C N O U c O C L R N > D •> N p - R C C U R N N O 3 �y acini ��� r� cu aa))N EN E m 0 a) (D 0-6 c m•w � E E m >E oo �d y L ��>a 0 E 41 `o R n C y O` 7 c L a) N d d d E >+ N U N O U -e C a N p CO R N aa)) a) E �� o c m w aCIS ? �L () me C U4; C a) N L R N 8 6 C E d E N Q. 7 U "� CI N •a`- O) Q.0 N O co •.L' L 7aLC d o C pch U S N E E 7 `p N N �.N N a) C N a) 7 c a E O O a) R m :L; R p 0 -2 C y R a) C a O a a) a) C 01'C a) O L a) N O QE N N..O.. u) U Q N "O L d> 4) a) O Ip 7 o, .6 7 3 R R N Ern 75 O O L zi -c:: C n y o ui o O B m U N O N a) a R a) o O 3m c o R ur O CG V d •E O n j O •� O O R R R L N R C Op p (O a C R C R N N N w M a) c 3 E a) C E a) R d C 'D cc- N L a o L C N O U d a '� C Q aC 7 0 p n a F O M R >, a) R.. a) N R 7 1.� 'C U p 0 4= a) w N N L a)a C R S RLu j C O N O N R Cy 7 D• 0) 7 0 j U a 0> 7LL fi. .iv y 2 U "� 7 'p R C a) N '� U v- O_ a) L >, a U ce ar W(D C .0+ 3 ; - 1�NV C w CN: C @ a) R C N .L-. W p c N n N O R ._ U a N U p O C CC" > —coR >� L 7 d O 'C p- ,� ..�-- :v ry/! N (� .N n 7 W U ca N N -, O R N. A f6 a) w R a) uJ �' r w 0 ID a) R � O o m S �C C '. me R R w 7 N n a) o N C C o.po E Q >, o v c � C R R C o N C _ N N a Cl;L) aR 7 Q0 7 ac) > CD R U >, U f0 U) '> rn U L C w Q' l6 O) d O E d 'N N 7 U �' f i 0 Cn C y= vj p a t N C (� M r N 7 -6 M d' of 7 0 h L OD tm O r '� N N a a) 2 C ca °j ac v,m amt a uia) U4 W; 'U. 4i .2 irioE `o ui o �Q icm�aoR a M E ai R U c4 ri ai � E ri E m ai G U` ri m vi ri ri w c° a Q. c E C7 S SG o m a Z O H Z O Y a a Z d � � J OW .Vi F- N � 0 W LL m W ~a W 5 Z 0 a ci F.. LL O a D U) PY 0.C1 uY r' f.YY t' C CH CV C2 ...... 10 C A r co U C d � U) C d U m L-) C N N N w- 'c J rn fn N _ N N O N m � O \O N C N� Q N C� O N N (6 N N O�p N =, JD (0 7 C N N f0 N ,,>', O N O f6 2.2 w>NU>—w VE'6r- t °' c� p Qo m -5� `m '� 2'N E o E E E m 7-0�� N N C0 w NIS, L U N N N 0).0 -p O ro CD 0= 70 m O' OU N L O m C O N E d 0 ca � N O O d .� C N N U C Y J -, N C L U C N C W L_ N N� O V) ` C E f6 N .O Q `O N a� a f6 C N CD N �� C p N U O_ N.L. C O Q yL.., D N N O N S N T .,N. c6 'O N U O n N o' > m N N N o m N N -D L O 7 5 >. 7 N a' 1 N p E« X c N :S C O O. O ID C 7 d C. - Y Lo -~O N L r- O N U) C O O C Ls N O O N U) "' N (u N U S L> NO N N C 7 N -0 N O'D N >i w-0 0.a. O _c (D.2- 7 N'O E 'O 7 Q N cts w O(q N r d O` N -OD p N 7` U) 7 O 10 N C N� Q O E O E- N In N C.� U) U N N O C n C w N > d L N L m 7 C O N E N N L N O U C 7(u O U m C- O N N � N .L- o {Q C __ 7 N C U) C U C Q p` -O O L N N p •- C N C In l0 C N N C '� N "'. O p C N O m > p L L ."' O N O U , W N N N N N O N 7 0' O T.0 O O N O j L N N N O O O U C N N p U j O U O Y N (>S L C Q N C O O Q 0-45 j O y Q 2 O' N 6 N 6 N 6 N Q V •N _N (6 N U C C C O- C m N CL N N C Q p C 0 O UI a C p_) N N N N N N a-• tv N 0U U O O U -p N N N. �' O O O O O O O N ">'' 7 CL CL N N N^, 7 U l O °� a (0 N f6 •> N M C:r- Z Z Z Z Z Z Z U d N C A C L f0 Z O O) C OO p 0 U _ - ai O O O c: O c: N (D N Ncc E O N N O 4;75. a a C N '� U L Z-- N _N 0 OL CL x C N a) co U Q N 4,P Q C .A N C p m N N O ` Q E C]- 4d' O C N cL N > O N > Q 7 .. N U C j f0 ,L.., N 2— C U N C f0 'en N m m C N C E E N> a O .'G Q-0 Q .E N N Q N a) L O' O O N 7 m C 0 C N N O m C C O N N p N d 7 C U C C U cC O N f6 N C O- O L D) R7.) C O m m m E (lf a m m c > a� a) r ) N U L C C (V :'7 C a) U mO L N N mN m N 16 m N V• �. O> N O 6 O 'G m ..+ w >s C N a — N 7 O C O C �� m O � °)o 7n. C N cc3. o N N Sao �o n cc >. O .L+ >. L C > 'O O, C1 L m- OCa ID l4 N N L >7 N C N C d E c _ .� '@ > •� cN > 0 � E 0 > ,7 Qm N no v o C tEi N N 7 d U U= O' a m N N N N m to W a E n E v> c o`o O E 7 aNO a`o X 0 7 V N`,C U) C C_ O 7 U) 7 U L m d O �'Q m U ':.M T) -6 U x U W p 'Q C W O UM ro O 'a N , r .0 N N •O Ci C Q N N N ro ps l0 N C <O IC !` M �Sy d17 V O > M �` M N t0 N 0 0 .D c •� M CL M f6 ' O M M C U fU Z vi 22 E and W F - LL Q U W 7 0 w a z 0 F - z 0 0 Y Q a Z 41 � J C m W v N w Ch W LL m Fa- NQ W 2 z 0 F- F- 2 - F - C G In z Q U) F- L) n 2 J. m N U c. E N C 'Lo C N a) m d w o� a6i L D a7 7 3 �Nt m 7 C C C .L+ y N (D m O L a) O > N L D U E O C L �0 Ca. _ -0 N C — a) a) Ema?mc o cN Oa N > m� mw N m N U N Ul a)d O L 7 •> Co 2 m O• N C C Q o c 7 N riic�y0 CL Q Q o N O z O 2 U d C C a) m N N O.L N O 0.0 O 01 mO 0O 'N N O� N C m i0 N D 7 0 L U N a)cl, -0 QC Ca) N O nE O U.L.. m MO c� L m m(0 S O V N. N i- ow C 0 E I m a) a) ' m 01 E m � aci o Ea 3 0 La O ;D N'a yE2 en E L NC: c w U N m d CD O a) C 7 C 0 C E (D L) °'E E a) v UO), O L a) 7 n 2 U N N 7 C R.2 N >' N 3 O 5 C a a) a) O) CO NC U O C V m C C C V Cc 7 > E m w o Lo n0� 2 O a) O N O n2 7•5L m UC Q> a) C c 6 E o :-2m0) �= 0 0 z CL N a)� 3: -0 m C U 7 l0 2 7 m m�am�Ej 0 '> x C 'j C a7 0 o N E N U~ m M d m a�L—; 7 a) a .L-. L) 0.2N Cg cu L O O N L m 4(5 0 Co 0 0 7— d C U yN+ L) 7 C O 0 d� � Ed-.- W n Co O N '> C> N O a o o v a$ -> NL 0 a) y a) () N N L O a) -O O m C 0 aO a) U— >m�-'-'Co Ex�0 O d n._ a) O E a) d U •> L w C M O m U a) 5 co: a D U L n C 5 a) 7 a) N U C C O U a) N j U 0(—m��Na)UC O C C d N C X E C D N a) > y E N N C m 6 mU oo CD cu E E OmCD nL� o z 0 °o> E N z N O C C N a) E 7 m O L C •s N O) m w C X a) NU C > m a) E a) o a.0 m m C Co C N ,V > N CJ m C_ O` r O- 7 N N L a) " ry C w N U DD > O ai D. C .0 2 0 as U C as 0 Ill (D Ca > U) CL co .9 L) C7 co n, c Ol Tj U) a) 2 L)o 0 a) Z: fz 'm CL V) 0 x�P,C u 2 5-� E 0- inas Fj,- ty, E �C ,45 �o 0- c 5 q.. 0 0 L) (D cd 13 E; > .3 CS > m C) CL In Cc: r- L1,1 IM7 {1 =3 M, CM IA CM - -se o j(A co . as --j Coll G al0 -asa) L) ca E 'DT7, > C.- 0 0,0 Ba 5' E cz ' 6 Ci 0 'S, 8, o eo) -a U, a; U) 9) E,a�a as E. 0 E (D cl E w L) :.D 0) c fo U)U)87 In co 0 = , K5 O' 0 w 87 E E 2 Ll -o 1J CD 0 M cL a E C5 43 ID M E tl C) J� 7.-;� 0 > V 0 E CD C: C E ID E c > r- 0 r- .2 rz r.L Em2 rJ U 0� F1--- - Q) c: rj"d C: 1 lu� 5 n 6 , E O C: -3 Z a_ LO) - - 0) O. aD E M L) .G as> L) 0 0 1.-0 ca O Ip U E as 2 ci. a) N =3 in a) w > a, N 2 (n O. R C) m cd -0 E E CL c-; cu C.) O CcC: L> a) 15 O Sf5 fa7 C 0. W c (uo An L 0 W U) W a) T— ,— s az it C. c F�i E 5 o 5 5 m o IS :a -2 � E5 01 0�4 ;5 =0 (L' >1 0 0 E C: E0 > - .- 0 ca,3) E al L) o r.- > L) (D -Ea D w vi a CL w U) C: > :3 C. 0>>1Z 0—,Cal, N o W > 0 ru XZI :5 ID CL �2 to —C, W.0 j:j 0 a) 'E T M 'o -r- 2 Ell ts ov f-- In W Z1, M ri ca, .1,5 3: (a. =3 as 0 al W > :3 0-0 �B as c as6 2 .0 2 �n- E '6 ' -0 w CCL c: 0 E — m 5 13 C ItA c a) CY 0 Q m ca 15 w co C3) �; = .0.0 m -- E o (D 11-5 ui 0 W :3 -F, 0 JC V� 0 E 4; �5 as d) IAw-0 .2 C C: :5 0 E E 0 - 0 i -O x E 01 E d) l-IOUa) c E 0 E co o 0) WE _0 C: -0 0w E (D - 1- E " '5 a) -13 W Z. W C) (D a m In 0 = - E F-. f, .,-, 2 �w 0 2� 0 "'- E m L E E w (D 0 1 E- > IL: �6 di �z E° cii cm d) LD al C: aj o n > >0 c L) Z CL _0 S �i C: 0 ca Cui `G r QaLL LL U W 7 O w 0- z Z O Z O 0 Y a Z d� � J C m CW OCh = N � W 0 m LUU) W 2 Z O a 0 C cl Z a U) a a LL O a U) m .4 V a E T a) (0 .' U as E C" CL c o N O C � N O) N y E O a) C O O O E00 c aa)) L L 0 o N R O O) C E LL � L � a) (0 O d N w m � c o � c � a) N D C Q. Cu) Z E Ca) ) : .- a) U UN 1] C 7 E v d O O U C O C L a) � T 6 c0 N O N O0a)L..,a) C O U N O -0 L co O C 0 o E Ul T p U L �0 rn m -cca m �oa)�c U a) Q� N •Q C N _ > (>D O O O . 6 () N N a) a) N a) 3 'd a (0 C 7 C a) N v U a) O_d0 Q O E N N D)o C N O C w > O CNC O o c 2 > N 0 C a 'o-2 O a) M � N E N Co N o? w O aS L o � -ta o co O C CD N w L U •� N a3 N C1 0) 0-- . O • - .2: ..�'. Z o. O. a) �n C, ¢V M .- v- 'C C5 U) N LL1 N d N N N W N N N N C C C C C O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z N L N w U L) a_ a) O C O Z .+ a) p U_ a) O U CO _ Z .. N 'y CO U C y O µ" N w U C(0 0 '� Co N a) (0 U a) a) O a) O U N N n 8 d O) a> CU C N C a) � N U p_ a) M Q t N a) a) E4= U aS O_ _ a) N O_ U E 0 u a) U ca om N p` � a) Q E L^ - y U 0 v�� o m O N 'm)O E"- 0 0 0) a) T a) L) C 2 q c d) j�.D N -O �Fu C 03y N n<°>��E o.f6o��E rnm c >'-0 o m E 'C >� O m E� 0 0) - C X O L -O y U U L Q) ' N o a) U N V T L a) ' a) U o a) 'C N f0 •N O. Q 01 C a) > >. >' d a5 Q D_ ?i a a) > >. U L O' Co 0. >, -2 a) n E CL C o m`o(D `oo L � moQE`oo a N f0 T.L-• 7 C p C p >s O C p m C J N N N C c n O• =3 aa)) y nE ` U a) z o c mE m a[ > via 'O SE K > EoccEo CO a- tpFL S0 0 a)(D E vo 75 x N X a) � ..J •N a) U N = 'N -O U N E 'U -> C N O C Q N O N y C a m N (� C C O T` T U E O N N E Y E O H N E ® O N N N OS N (n C.7 � a) N` N L+ p L__ .� O Q N� a) a) p N O C; L "_ _ . � o.2 x> d, 00 ai 5 O) ai�s.9 W Ci " U •U C O ri.3:°�°mf6a U U C O ri3«°«°a)�o_ C �c on a a �E �< m2 w CLU G LL Q O H U W -9 O w IL Z O Z O Y a a Z ,Do 3 J C m O LLI H N � W LLL LLI U) _j LLJm Q LLI 2 Z _O a 0 _H D Z a W I— L) n- 2 2 LL O Q U) m '0 M0 C,9 C_l CN C M .- p (_l Lt. Y ro � U E Q7 � C u L c. m N v N ) c rn U) a) a) p U L lL. .L -L ai m N N p) jT m m m C C C Y O J C N w U C N p CM N °� Q 3 p 0 E m N m L QL� N > E c o o aa)j a) QQ' R Edd N O O f I- C_ U O O OL_ O .2.0 `` Ta)C N o O 0 m O p � O� cG co C O) >i L O p O) N .O > C Co m O- m m N C m U O O- C a) 4'S L C U E p a J C Q C C p N L .� -6 E O C U .2 C m N N .L..� C 0)' V U 7 p > O C w p) Q O C m .E J m O O E 0 7 a) cl > O` N U y a) a) J N O 0_ m J m C L L C in ca f0 of _ m 3 0 7 (n o L ma �3o a) a) m J • > c N m > c C m m p N Q) m a):5 C O C N U a) O- U7 O m .0 w- ' CU a) -C-3:O`O Q LUp CJ a) UU> O O C a)p O Ono N O C •Oaa)- O L N N Eo O L O m N f6 0_ n Z -0m O m L O V O a) 0-1 o m N C) C 7 O N M.2 Q O> o L a) L O Cl) Oo L m d - E a) aa) a) a7 - o.E �ww�w m O� U m j a) m L U- L a) a) N w U 'c m U p ca N cu O N y -m m C �5 caN 0) N N N N o N C O 7 3 '0 O Ill c 7 E C.L.. a) p CCL O.6 N Q' L C C C.Qm f� a) N C 7 7 cr 3 -p J _O CO U Ems) r �. E N m m 7 p M m C U 7 O) U U J a) J N d > O C LL '� N N O L LL C N N lL N O C y' j a) a) p) O m a3 �QCO OU cot Z Z Z L CQ'.0 HQH X00 co Q' a) CO Z Z C O C 'N m- N N O C () N CO +L- N D_ C O j U)C N a) O) O O C o'N m 3 ia -0.2 a)) L N L C6 coo— a) -0 E E L a) aEi a) X u) L-. a) a) a) m N is U U a) C N a a) U C' � T m d d m N� (6 �!Ed 2O a m > C:r- f C J 7 O `'o C E 0)L UC 70 E a) O U o L N'O U L f6 c iu U c U E N c f $ o o E> -' o •C C U U N N fmA m .CL Y Q U' co U �j U 0 U m m C 0 m N 0_ V C U L E a N' G N J N C J 0 0-0 U mp N C V. L 7 N mo;foo N E0 o�0.'6a ca Ec n E p .0 0-m a) N -o N '6-0-0 C) L U m L p co .O DO(CNwo E N N 'O T.2 2 a j C d a) Co N o j,'-" T'U Y m t N U O m N E (6 .0 C U C -0-o O U O U n. E C a) - N U'O w L M Q>,U Q a) p) -N LN.N••' 0) UO UN C (D 0 `UCC N N ';` NC_ NO f -0 7C a) aO)O -0O OCN ON -00 i. O N E d C0. ` U>N Q.>dN fa CmoiNT p U U> a) m 0.0 > Q N U N U N m aci m 'U .� C1 0 m O y d U — °) a) >— �+ 8.2 « N N N C 0 m o) O a) o� O o a. c CU _E_ c Co E_ N m c o o� 0 0- O m o ;.V N o p m a p= C� o O C m C- U 7 E N N_0 O. O O U p N 2 o..� a) N O. O ami c ®,a) N 7 L .0 0 C (!)yµaEm - 7 p a) O C U) INEm J U a) ac) I- L aj C a) N E I-Umao C: -0, L x 0� N <7 3 0 o E a N 0 E o iri m N U L !9 N O ri N a) o. p �CL>� �pw'V>� f p. o j �V ay m CL "i o ti ac) 0. ri n`o ° ac) a Cl) cc��V... �a�d-�� Ta vi `o nm E o E m'D aim g c E �E W H LL ❑ F- U W O a z O z O Y Q IL z_ d ° 3 J r m C W O = H N � fq O W FQ- U) Q W m z _O P Q ❑ z Q I -- L) L) IL 2 LL O Q N 'n V N O 00 M — C] 4 Q N w V i U) N N N N N N N N W :3 •5 c •5 a`cr) m d m ami a) a) a) a) (D a) 0 (U (D 0 0 z 0 0 z 0 z 0 0 z z z z z `o a)a) .0 c - - - aS .T M -0L C � w C L N N `m (J O a) c� o�E o�E �� m oro0 ID 0 Co m o CD a) m� E 2 m (u a� (ua) a) L 3 u as C N a) O �'Ec 0O �- a)'�'p a)"'0 -o a) T.L.+ a0 �� d E LO a d) am vi n- vi Q. To E° E(D D Q y c 0 iE Z�(o 0u- w o Na m. m. E o m Qj a) m 0 6 o �° QE E 0 QE a o c f0 m Ua) 7 •QQ U d O o C U -j a3 U =03 j j N Z N °a o� U 0W U o3 O oc U U Oo U 00 U y C L N U N O C) •p N 'N U N' T U Z. C C c .� a) O E a) N m a) '2 coU a) > N a) m a) U am a) m a m4 Q2•m o nE QQ�i CL U .6 -p LL m a c a) a) U 3 01., () C C O C a) N U N N C. � a) O U. N a) > C+ a) U U. N a7 > N a) 10 N d N a) c N O a) cin ai N 0 n2 N O o0N nc• C o E a-0 m oEno o m Q oEno n� as Q om oc oN n� > - iv ., o o• n6� O,6 X (p QO U U O cc QN.0 o u O.- a)Y o u Q� a)LO. O Qa) N 0 CL 7 m c at1J L `) L C L C A t 7 L 7 0, L n <a L N O m O F �m 0 C ~Eo 0 ~3a6ic 0 F-�a6ic C I—��N— I—� U O a a` E O` `N'm N C N M a) c a a) ,o IA O C O 10 a) h 0 00 �> N a) C a•- M O iN... C a 7 O X co N- t'3 C X N N N e- a) a3 � N N N "O a3 co •p N V) N 0. M U M U a) U M () a) M L a5 M L m V) C M a) M ® E m 4 CHAPTER, 1 h -014-01A• This Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been prepared by the City of Baldwin Park, California (City), pursuant to the applicable provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and its implementing guidelines, known as the CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, Sections 15000-15387). The City of Baldwin Park is the Lead Agency for this EIR, which examines the potential physical impacts to the environment as a result of the proposed City of Baldwin Park Downtown Transit -Oriented Design (TOD) Specific Plan Project (the project) of an approximately 115 -acre area that encompasses the Downtown Baldwin Park area in proximity to the Metrolink Station (the Specific Plan area). Please refer to Chapter 2, Project Description for a more detailed discussion of the Specific Plan area and its location. This Draft EIR evaluates impacts that could result from implementation of the proposed Specific Plan as compared to existing conditions. CEQA requires that before a decision can be made to approve a project with potentially significant environmental impacts, an EIR must be prepared that fully describes the environmental impacts of the project and identifies feasible mitigation for significant impacts. The EIR is a public information document for use by governmental agencies and the public to identify and evaluate potential environmental consequences of a proposed project, to recommend mitigation measures to lessen or eliminate adverse impacts, and to examine feasible alternatives to the project. The information contained in this EIR is to be reviewed and considered by the governing agency prior to the ultimate decision to approve, disapprove, or modify the proposed project. 1.1 Purpose of In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15121(a), the purpose of an EIR is to serve as an informational document that will generally inform public agency decision makers and the public of the significant environmental effects of a project, and possible ways to minimize those significant effects. CEQA Guidelines Section 15151 contains the following standards for EIR adequacy: "An EIR should be prepared with a sufficient degree of analysis to provide decision makers with information which enables them to make a decision which intelligently takes account of environmental consequences. An evaluation of the environmental effects of a proposed project need not be exhaustive, but the sufficiency of an EIR is to be reviewed in the light of what is reasonably feasible. Disagreement among experts does not make an EIR inadequate, but the EIR should summarize the main points of disagreement among the experts. The courts have Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project t -1 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 I. Introduction looked notfor perfection but for adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure. " The purpose of this EIR is to provide an objective, full -disclosure document to inform agency decision makers and the general public of the direct and indirect environmental impacts of the proposed Specific Plan project, and related actions. This EIR is prepared in conformance with Section 15161 of the CEQA Guidelines, and the primary purpose of this EIR is to: • Identify and evaluate potential environmental consequences of the proposed project. • Assess cumulative impacts of the project in conjunction with related past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects within the area. • Indicate the manner in which those environmental consequences can be mitigated or avoided. • Define and analyze alternatives that have the potential to reduce or eliminate potentially significant impacts associated with the proposed project or non-clustered scenario. • Identify impacts, if any, that even with the implementation of mitigation measures would be unavoidable and adverse. • Provide documentation supporting these determinations. In addition, an EIR must also identify and evaluate a reasonable range of alternatives to the project that have the,potential to mitigate or avoid the project's potential significant environmental effects while feasibly accomplishing most of the project's basic objectives. Therefore, the purpose of an EIR (or any environmental document required under CEQA) is to focus the discussion on the project's potential effects on the environment. The purpose of this EIR for the proposed Specific Plan is also to provide for streamlining of later environmental review of subsequent site-specific development projects undertaken pursuant to the Specific Plan. As described in Section 15175 of the CEQA Guidelines, plan level EIRs may form the basis for later decision making and may streamline the later environmental review of projects or approvals included within the project, plan or program. EIRs can be prepared for: (1) a project that consists of smaller individual projects that will be carried out in phases; (2) a general plan, general plan update, general plan element, general plan amendment, or specific plan; and/or (3) projects that will be carried out or approved pursuant to a development agreement. The proposed project includes, among other things, plans for infill development, a general plan amendment, a specific plan, and anticipates future infill development projects that may require a development agreement. Thus, CEQA requires, and this EIR includes an evaluation of cumulative impacts, growth inducing impacts, and irreversible significant effects on the environment of subsequent projects to the greatest extent feasible. 1.2 Project Overview The proposed Specific Plan project envisions the revitalization of the 115 -acre area that encompasses Downtown Baldwin Park and its immediate vicinity. With adoption of the Baldwin Baldwin Park TOD Specific plan Project 1-2 ESA ( D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 1 Introduction Park 2020 General Plan in 2002 and the recent zoning code update, the City re-established its commitment to a pedestrian core for the Downtown, as well as a new Mixed -Use General Plan land use designation for the area. The proposed Specific Plan has been prepared to implement the General Plan by specifically addressing: the distribution, location, maximum development criteria, standards, regulations, and extent of land uses within the plan area; transportation, transit, parking, and infrastructure improvements that are necessary to implement the General Plan policies for a mixed use, TOD Downtown area. The General Plan also includes policies to include the development of outdoor cafes, flower sales, stalls, and kiosks, and other uses compatible with pedestrian activity, which are implemented by the proposed Specific Plan. The Specific Plan area is within walking distance to a Metrolink station, and provides infill development opportunities for additional housing, retail, and other commercial development in a pedestrian- and TOD. The proposed Downtown TOD Specific Plan identifies sites that have the potential for redevelopment, infill development, and/or adaptive reuse of existing under-utilized structures to better serve the Downtown area; which are identified as "Opportunity Sites". The Specific Plan proposes to rezone and amend General Plan land uses of specific parcels within the Specific Plan area with the intent of introducing a TOD pattern to the area. The build out of the land uses identified in the Specific Plan would result in development of 833 additional residential units and 289,135 square feet of non-residential space. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Sectionl5082, on December 31, 2014, the City of Baldwin Park issued a Notice of Preparation (NOP) and Initial Study, which was sent to the State Clearinghouse, Office of Planning and Research, responsible agencies, and other interested parties. The NOP and Initial Study circulated for approximately thirty days, until approximately February 5, 2015. The NOP requested those agencies with regulatory authority over any aspect of the proposed project to review the issues that would be addressed by the EIR and to identify any additional relevant environmental issues that should be addressed. Comment letters were received by the City from seven agencies in response to the NOP. The NOP and responses to the NOP are included in this Draft EIR as Appendix A. A general summary of the areas of concern raised in these letters is provided in Table 1.1. TABLE 1.1 TOPICS RAISED IN RESPONSE TO THE NOP . ...___ ._..... .. — ........... Comment/Date Summary of Comment Location of Discussion Southern California The commenter states that Southern California Association of EIR Section 3.13, Association of Governments (S AGI is the designated Regional Transportation Transportation and Traffic Governments Agency and the clearinghouse For regionally significant projects, EIR Section 3.10, February 5, 2015 and reviews projects for consistency/ with local Goad regional plans. Population and Housing The commenter then provides a list of the 2012 Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTPISCS) Goals and Strategies that may he applicable to the proposed Specific Plan, In addition, tine commenter, providesthe SLAG Regional Growth Forecast and recommends review of SCA(, recommended nnilig ation tneasures from the 2012 RTP/SCS Final EIR. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 1-3 ESA I D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 TABLE 1.1 TOPICS RAISED IN RESPONSE TO THE NOP Comment/Date Summary of Comment Location of Discussion South Coast Air The commenter requested that a copy of the Draft EIR be EIR Section 3.2, Air Quality Management forwarded to the South Coast Air Quality Management District Quality District (SCAQMD) upon completion, and to include all appendices or January 7, 2015 technical documents related to air quality and greenhouse gas seven days per week. The comment also states that due to the analyses to ensure their review in a timely manner. The commenter recommended that the lead agency use the CEQA Air Quality Handbook as guidance for its air quality analysis, and that impacts may be expected. In addition, the commenter states that they use the CalEEMod land use emissions software. The commenter stated that all air quality impacts from all phases of the Project and all air pollutant sources related to the Project should however, the pedestrian and vehicle traffic generated by be identified, including those for both construction and operation. The commenter stated that criteria pollutant emissions should be quantified and results should be compared to the SCAQMD Boulevard, and additional rail safety measures are recommend. recommended regional significance thresholds. Comparison of localized air quality impacts to local significance thresholds is also recommended. A mobile source health risk assessment should be ROW would require an access agreement from Metrolink. performed should the Project generate or attract vehicular trips. City of Azusa Guidance on siting incompatible land uses can be found in N/A California Air Resources Board's Air Quality and Land Use impact on the City of Azusa. Handbook. The commenter lists several resources available to Suburban Water assist the Lead Agency with identifying possible mitigation N/A measures for the Project. The commenter provides contact outside of Suburban's service area, and the purveyor has no information for data retrieval. Los Angeles County The commenter states that the project area includes a railroad EIR Section 3.13, Metropolitan right-of-way (ROW), and that trains operate 24 hours per day, Transportation and Traffic Transportation seven days per week in the ROW, and that there shall be no Authority (Metro) encroachment into the ROW. The comment also states that the January 21, 2015 traffic impact analysis is required to include analysis regarding impacts to State of California Congestion Management Program seven days per week. The comment also states that due to the (CMP) facilities. The comment provides guidelines for preparation of the CMP evaluation. Metrolink The commenter states that Metrolink operates 38 passenger trains EIR Section 3.13, February 3, 2015 and the Union Pacific Railroad operates four freight trains daily Transportation and Traffic through the project area, and that trains operate 24 hours per day, seven days per week. The comment also states that due to the proximity of the Specific Plan area to the tracks noise and visual impacts may be expected. In addition, the commenter states that TOD developments around the Metrolink Station is encouraged; however, the pedestrian and vehicle traffic generated by developments could impact safety at the rail crossing at Ramona Boulevard, and additional rail safety measures are recommend. Furthermore, the comment states that construction adjacent to the ROW would require an access agreement from Metrolink. City of Azusa The comment states that the proposed project has no significant N/A January 26, 2015 impact on the City of Azusa. Suburban Water The commenter stated to be advised that the proposed project is N/A Systems outside of Suburban's service area, and the purveyor has no January 12, 2015 facilities in the project area. Los Angeles County The commenter stated wastewater to be generated by the Sanitation Districts proposed project would be treated at the San Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant, which as a design capacity of 100 mgd. The availability of sewer capacity would be determined on submission of a copy of the project's build out schedule to LACSD to ensure the project is considered for future planning. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 1-4 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 1, Introduction In addition, a Notice of Scoping Meeting was issued by the City of Baldwin Park on December 31, 2014. The public scoping meeting was held on January 14, 2015 at the Julia McNeill Senior Center, 4100 Baldwin Park Boulevard, Baldwin Park, California. The intent of the scoping meeting was to solicit written comments regarding which environmental issues should be evaluated in the EIR. A summary of the scoping meeting and comments received at the scoping meeting are included as Appendix A and Table 1.2. Summary of Comment TABLE 1.2 COMMENTS RAISED AT THE SCOPING MEETING Location of Discussion Con,menters state that Baldwin L'ark's water needs already EIR Section 3.7, Hydrology and Water Quality exceed aquifeA, firni[Mions and water needs to meet demand. EIR Section 3.14, Utilities The ground water level is at its lowest pt.,jint ever, and Supply is decreasing- 'the commenters further state that any new devOopment watt require additional leased water at a Nghei price, and that water supply and service Issues need to be addressed in the EIR. The cornmenter stated that the traffic study needs to address EIR Section 3.13, Transportation and Traffic where traffic will be diverted if a portion of Maine Avenue is closed. The commenter stated concern that the project may reduce EIR Section 3.13, Transportation and Traffic lanes on northern portion of Maine Avenue. `rhe corrurtenter slated concerr, that as new development EIR Section 3.13, Transportation and Traffic occurs in Downtown, people will have to park ftfirther away frorni the use as the dernand for parking increases, The caninnenter stated that parking needs to be managad so that people do not have to walk fargler between the use and parking spaces. 1.4 Public Review of the Draft EIR The EIR will be circulated for review and comment by the public and other interested parties, agencies and organizations for 45 days in accordance with Section 15087 and Section 15105 of the CEQA Guidelines. During the 45 -day review period, the Draft EIR will be available for public review at the project's website: It III/ jtrig n/ or the following locations: L City of Baldwin Park Community Development Department 14403 E. Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, CA 91706 Hours: 7:30 am through 6:00 pm, Monday through Thursday Baldwin Park Library 4181 Baldwin Park Boulevard Baldwin Park, CA 91706-3203 Phone: (626) 962-6947 Interested parties may provide written comments on the Draft EIR. Written comments should be addressed to: ---- . . . ............... Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 1-5 ESA I D130 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 I. Introduction Amy L. Harbin, AICP, City Planner City of Baldwin Park 14403 E. Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, CA 91706 Email: AHarbin@baldwinpark.com Upon completion of the 45 -day review period, written responses to all comments on the environmental issues discussed in the Draft EIR will be prepared and incorporated into a Final EIR. Furthermore, written responses to comments received from any state agencies will be made available to those agencies at least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing at which the Certification of the Final EIR will be considered. These comments, and their responses, will be included in the Final EIR for consideration by the City, as well as other Responsible Agencies under CEQA. The Final EIR may also contain corrections and additions to the Draft EIR and other information relevant to the environmental issues associated with the project. The Final EIR will be available for public review prior to its certification by the City. Notice of the availability of the Final EIR will be sent to all who responded to the NOP, to the Draft EIR, and to owners and occupants within a 300 -foot radius of the Specific Plan area. 1.5 Organization of this Draft EIR The Draft EIR is organized into the following chapters. To help the reader locate information of particular interest, a brief summary of the contents of each chapter of the Draft EIR is provided below. • Executive Summary: This chapter provides a brief summary of the Specific Plan area, the proposed project, and alternatives. The Summary culminates with Table ES -1, Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures. This table lists each identified environmental impact, proposed mitigation measure (if any), and the level of significance after implementation of each mitigation measure. The level of significance after implementation of the proposed mitigation measure(s) will be less than significant, or significant and unavoidable. Chapter 1 — Introduction: This chapter provides an overview of the Project, the purpose and use of the Draft EIR, the scope of this Draft EIR, a summary of the legal authority for this Draft EIR, a summary of the environmental review process for the EIR, and the general format of the document. Chapter 2 — Project Description: This chapter provides a detailed description of the Project. The description also includes the Project goals and objectives. Chapter 3 — Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures: This chapter provides a discussion of the setting (existing conditions) including existing regulations, the environmental impacts including potential cumulative impacts that could result from the proposed project, and the mitigation measures that would reduce or eliminate the adverse impacts identified. Impacts that cannot be mitigated to less than significant are identified as significant and unavoidable. Adopted regulations with which the project Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 1-6 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 1, Introduction would be required to comply that serve to reduce potential adverse effects are discussed where appropriate. Chapter 4 — Alternatives: This chapter describes and analyzes a reasonable range of alternatives to the project. The CEQA-mandated No Project Alternative is included along with alternatives that would reduce one or more significant effects of the proposed Proj ect. • Chapter 6 — CEQA Statutory Sections: This chapter provides a discussion of various CEQA-mandated considerations including a summary of significant and unavoidable impacts, growth -inducing impacts, and significant irreversible changes. • Chapter 6 — Report Preparation: This chapter lists authors of the Draft EIR; City staff that assisted with the preparation and review of this document, and agencies; and organizations consulted by the authors of this Draft EIR. IBaldwIn Park TOD Specific Plan Project 1-7 ESA ( D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 CHAPTER 2 Project Description 2.1 Introduction The proposed Downtown Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Specific Plan is a City -initiated, Metro grant -funded planning document that has been prepared to provide a clear vision for development within the Downtown Baldwin Park area. The proposed Specific Plan has been developed with the overarching intent of introducing a transit -oriented development pattern to the 115 acre Specific Plan area. The Specific Plan would guide future development of the Downtown area to generate a walkable transit -oriented environment that is proximate to the Metrolink Station and that would provide improved access to all modes of transportation, including transit, walking and bicycling. The proposed Specific Plan is intended to provide opportunities to build on the City's unique historic and cultural characteristics to enhance the Downtown core; take advantage of the location of the Metrolink Station and access to regional transit; create a strong community identity and sense of place; provide new employment, housing and shopping opportunities; and strengthen the City's tax base. Opportunities exist within walking distance of the Metrolink Station and Transit Center parking structure allow significant potential for infill development and adaptive reuse of existing under-utilized structures to better serve the transit -oriented Downtown area and generate new investment. The proposed Specific Plan is intended to guide future development of mixed uses in a walkable environment, streamline the development process, and serve as an incentive for economic development. 2.2 Project Location and Plan Area Characteristics City of Baldwin Park The City of Baldwin Park (the "City" or "Baldwin Park") is located east of Los Angeles, south of the San Gabriel Mountains, north of the Puente Hills within eastern Los Angeles County. Baldwin Park is located approximately 15 miles east of Downtown Los Angeles, and approximately 17 miles west of the Los Angeles County -San Bernardino County border. Baldwin Park occupies approximately 6.8 square miles (4,337 acres) and is a highly urbanized area. Baldwin Park is surrounded by the Cities of Irwindale (north, northeast, northwest), West Covina (east and southeast), Industry (southwest), and El Monte (east); and shares its southern border with Arcadia and a small area of unincorporated Los Angeles County known as the La Puente community. Figure 2-1 shows the City's regional location. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 2-1 ESA A D136953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 o�n�npamo�nmnnTooa�o��m�R.1o�o amumoe:umxn��ano��s/s Figure 2-1 Regional Location 2. Project Description Baldwin Park is proximate to three major freeways -- the I-10, Interstate 605 (1-605), and Interstate -210 (1-210). I-10 is parallel to the City's southern boundary and extends through the City on an east -west axis. 1-605 extends along a north -south axis parallel to and near a portion of the City's western boundary. I-10 and I-605 intersect in Baldwin Park at an interchange in the southwest corner of the City. I-210 extends along an east -west axis and is located north of the City of Baldwin Park, through the Cities of Azusa, Irwindale, and Duarte. The City includes a segment of the San Bernardino Metrolink line, which includes the Baldwin Park Metrolink station in Downtown Baldwin Park. The Metrolink line provides a non - automotive connection to major business, employment, shopping, and entertainment centers throughout the region. Union Station and Downtown Los Angeles are located only three stops away to the west, and Cal State Los Angeles is located only two stops away from Baldwin Park, also to the west. To the east, the Metrolink line connects Baldwin Park with Covina, Pomona, Claremont, Montclair, Upland, Rancho Cucamonga, Fontana, Rialto, and San Bernardino. The Metrolink line also provides a direct connection at Los Angeles Union Station to the Red, Purple, and Gold Metro lines and to the Metrobus system. Like most cities in the San Gabriel Valley, Baldwin Park is primarily a residential community with most of its land used for single-family homes, large condominium complexes, townhomes, and multi -family apartment complexes. Industrial land uses are generally concentrated along the northern perimeter of the City; commercial uses are concentrated along Ramona Boulevard, Maine Avenue, Baldwin Park Boulevard, and along or near I-10. Specific Plan Area Location The Project site consists of approximately 115 acres in the Downtown portion of Baldwin Park that includes the Metrolink Station (see Figure 2-2 Specific Plan area). The Specific Plan area is anchored by the Ramona Boulevard/Maine Avenue intersection, and includes parcels along Ramona Boulevard, Baldwin Park Avenue, Maine Avenue, and Bogart Avenue. The Specific Plan area includes the Baldwin Park Metrolink station, the Arts and Recreation Center, and the City Hall complex, which includes the Police Station. The Metrolink station is less than 1,000 feet from Ramona Boulevard, and is separated from the Downtown area by the tracks and the City Hall complex. Existing Land Use, General Plan Designations, and Zoning The Specific Plan area includes the prime commercial retail area of the City. As shown in Table 2-1, 36 percent of the Specific Plan area is used for retail and over 17 percent of the area is used for government or public facilities, including: City Hall, the police station, post office, Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 2-3 ESA / D136953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 Mq ro _0 C: m OlW 'all 0- ro 0 co a Morgan Park Community Center, Arts and Recreation Center, Julia McNeill Senior Center, Baldwin Park Transit Center, and the Metrolink station. Existing land uses within the Specific Plan are shown in Figure 2-3. TABLE 2-1 EXISTING LAND USES WITHIN THE SPECIFIC PAN AREA The Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan (adopted in 2002), identified land uses "to strengthen the economic vitality and aesthetic character of the Downtown through the establishment of a mixed use pedestrian district which builds on Livable Communities principles and techniques." Consistent with this objective, mixed use land uses encompass 34 percent of the Specific Plan area and commercial related land uses comprise approximately 14 percent, as listed on Table 2-2 and shown in Figure 2-4. The City of Baldwin Park recently completed an update to its Zoning Code (adopted 2012). A major focus of the Zoning Code Update was to incorporate Mixed Use zoning at appropriate locations to support the Mixed Use Land Use Designations identified in the 2002 General Plan. As such, a large portion of the Specific Plan area is zoned Mixed Use (MU -1). The MU -1 Zone is intended to create opportunities for development that integrates commercial and residential development, particularly in the City's Downtown, and is conducive for projects that support transit and walkability. The existing zoning within the Specific Plan area is listed in Table 2-3 and shown in Figure 2-5. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 2-5 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 Percentage of Specific Plan Existing Land Use Acres Area General Office Use 2.42 2.10% Government Offices 4.71 4.10% High Density Single Family Residential 7.73 6.72% Low -Rise Apartments, Condominiums, And Townhouses 0.53 0.46% Manufacturing, Assembly, And Industrial Services 3.83 3.33% Mixed Commercial And Industrial 2.29 2.00% Open Space and Public Facilities 10.55 9.18% Park and Ride Lots 1.55 1.35% Metrolink San Bernardino Line 3.24 2.82% Retail 41.47 36.08% Total Net Acres 78.32 68.14% Right of Way 36.62 31.86% Total Gross Acres 114.95 100.00% SOURCE: Existing Conditions and Opportunities, May 2014,. The Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan (adopted in 2002), identified land uses "to strengthen the economic vitality and aesthetic character of the Downtown through the establishment of a mixed use pedestrian district which builds on Livable Communities principles and techniques." Consistent with this objective, mixed use land uses encompass 34 percent of the Specific Plan area and commercial related land uses comprise approximately 14 percent, as listed on Table 2-2 and shown in Figure 2-4. The City of Baldwin Park recently completed an update to its Zoning Code (adopted 2012). A major focus of the Zoning Code Update was to incorporate Mixed Use zoning at appropriate locations to support the Mixed Use Land Use Designations identified in the 2002 General Plan. As such, a large portion of the Specific Plan area is zoned Mixed Use (MU -1). The MU -1 Zone is intended to create opportunities for development that integrates commercial and residential development, particularly in the City's Downtown, and is conducive for projects that support transit and walkability. The existing zoning within the Specific Plan area is listed in Table 2-3 and shown in Figure 2-5. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 2-5 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 0 21, TABLE 2-2 GENERAL PLAN LAND USES WITHIN THE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA Mixed Use (0-30 du/acre) 39.54 Percentage of Neighborhood Commercial 2.49 Specific Plan Existing Land Use Acres Area Commercial/Industrial 2.93 2.55% Garden Multi -family Residential (0-8.7 du/acre) 3.52 3.06% General Commercial 11.22 9.76% General Industrial 1.37 1.19% Mixed Use (0-30 du/acre) 39.54 34.40% Neighborhood Commercial 2.49 2.17% Open Space 10.06 8.75% Public Facilities and Schools 7.19 6.26% Total Net Acres 78.32 68.14% Right of Way 36.63 31.86% Total Gross Acres 114.95 100.00% SOURCE: Existing Conditions and Opportunities, May 2014. TABLE 2-3 EXISTING ZONING WITHIN THE SPECIFIC PAN AREA MU -1 Mixed Use (0-30 du/ac) 38.81 Percentage of OS Open Space 10.06 Specific Plan Existing Zone Acres Area C1 Neighborhood Commercial 8.22 7.15% C2 General Commercial 11.22 9.76% IC Industrial Commercial 4.53 3.94% MU -1 Mixed Use (0-30 du/ac) 38.81 33.76% OS Open Space 10.06 8.75% RI Single Family Residential 1.21 1.05% RG Garden Multi -Family Residential 3.49 3.08% Total Net Acres 77.53 67.45% Right of Way 37.42 32.65% Total Gross Acres 114.95 100.00% SOURCE: Existing Conditions and Opportunities, May 2014. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 2-7 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 Cl) IT§ » @&/ 7 (L) o: co ° § \ a_ m 2 \ § / - ƒ \ k E E \ \ / §Lo 2 \ / ca C) -i6 (D E E E E o 0 CL LL c U) - CD I c: :3 6) a) a c o o cq M cL) 0 LL. LU C: z cli X w 2- U) L3 Q CD cl� Iz O0 E n 10 15 r) cd m ca C) -i6 (D E E E E o 0 CL LL c U) - CD I c: :3 6) a) a c o o 2. Existing Circulation Pattern Baldwin Park's existing circulation pattern a modified grid, which consists of arterials, collector roadways, and residential streets. The City is served by two arterials that cross in the geographic center of the City — Baldwin Park Boulevard and Ramona Boulevard. Baldwin Park Boulevard provides direct access to I-10 and Ramona Boulevard provides direct access to 1-605. All of Baldwin Park's important collector streets, including Maine Avenue (north)/Pacific Avenue (south), Francisquito Avenue and Merced Avenue, cross Ramona Boulevard. Ramona Boulevard and Maine Avenue/Pacific Avenue, cross the center and extend through the Specific Plan area. Ramona Boulevard, which lies on a southwest -northeast axis, directly connects the Specific Plan area with I-605. (Ramona Boulevard becomes San Bernardino Road in Irwindale.) Maine Avenue/Pacific Avenue extends through the Specific Plan area on a north - south axis. 2.3 Project Characteristics The proposed Downtown TOD Specific Plan identifies sites that have the potential for redevelopment, infill development, and/or adaptive reuse of existing under-utilized structures to better serve the Downtown area; which are identified as "Opportunity Sites". The Specific Plan proposes to rezone and amend General Plan land uses of specific parcels within the project area with the intent of introducing a transit -oriented development pattern to the area. This would provide development that is located within easy walking distance of a major transit stop and generally is a mix of residential, employment, retail, and complementing public uses. The proposed Specific Plan would guide future development of the Downtown area to generate a walkable transit -oriented environment that is proximate to the Metrolink Station and Metro bus route 190/194 that runs between Cal Poly Pomona and the El Monte Metrolink station along Ramona Boulevard, and that would provide improved access to all modes of transportation, including transit, walking and bicycling. There are a number of underutilized properties, large parking lots, and right-of-way areas in the Specific Plan area that provide opportunities for new infill development that can serve as catalyst to revitalizing the area. Under the proposed Specific Plan, the infill developments provide higher density housing and employment uses proximate to regional transit, with pedestrian -oriented retail uses lining Ramona Boulevard and Maine Avenue. The Specific Plan identifies sites that have the potential for redevelopment, infill development, and/or adaptive reuse of existing underutilized spaces to better serve the Downtown area. The Specific Plan proposes to rezone areas to provide for the TOD envisioned by the Specific Plan. Table 2-4 shows the change in development capacity that would result from build out of the proposed Specific Plan. Table 2-5 shows the zoning and General Plan land use amendments that would occur as a part of the proposed Specific Plan. The proposed zoning designations are illustrated in Figure 2-6. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 2-10 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 2 P TABLE 2-4 CHANGE IN DEVELOPMENT CAPACITY TABLE 2-5 SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN LAND USE AMENDMENTS Residential Non -Residential Units (SF) Existing Development 101 886,538 Specific Plan Build Out 934 1,175,673 Total Increase 833 289,136 SOURCE: The Arroyo Group, 2014. Existing Non- TABLE 2-5 SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN LAND USE AMENDMENTS Design Concepts The design concept of the Specific Plan is to create a system of spaces, structures, and environments that are integrated into the surroundings rather than linear strips of unrelated buildings and undefined streetscapes. The Specific Plan would establish Downtown as the core of the community — a place for living, shopping, recreation and leisure, City government, and local and regional transit connectivity — and increasing pedestrian connectivity between these uses. The adjacency of the City Hall complex to the Metrolink Station, Morgan Park, and the pedestrian - scaled retail uses along portions of Ramona Boulevard and Maine Avenue make the area a cornerstone for a walkable and vibrant community. The proposed Specific Plan would provide for. an Arts Park, active storefronts, higher density housing, and pedestrian nodes with amenities such as high-quality street furniture, and lighting. The design concepts that would be implemented by the Specific Plan are described below and shown in Figure 2-7. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Pian Project 2-11 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 Capacity Existing for Existing Non- Capacity for Non - Residential Residential Residential Residential Existing Zoning and Land Use Acreage Units (SF) Proposed Zoning and Land Use Units (SF) C-2: General Commercial 1.98 15,640 MU -1 - Mixed Use 11,171 C-2: General Commercial 0.79 13 RG - Garden 13 - Multi -Family Residential C-1: Neighborhood 0.18 MU -1 - Mixed Use 4 1,733 Commercial IC: Industrial Commercial 1.55 - MU -1 - Mixed Use 62 3,025 R1: Single Family Residential 1.20 17 1,925 RG - Garden 15 - Multi -Family Residential SOURCE: The Arroyo Group, 2014. Design Concepts The design concept of the Specific Plan is to create a system of spaces, structures, and environments that are integrated into the surroundings rather than linear strips of unrelated buildings and undefined streetscapes. The Specific Plan would establish Downtown as the core of the community — a place for living, shopping, recreation and leisure, City government, and local and regional transit connectivity — and increasing pedestrian connectivity between these uses. The adjacency of the City Hall complex to the Metrolink Station, Morgan Park, and the pedestrian - scaled retail uses along portions of Ramona Boulevard and Maine Avenue make the area a cornerstone for a walkable and vibrant community. The proposed Specific Plan would provide for. an Arts Park, active storefronts, higher density housing, and pedestrian nodes with amenities such as high-quality street furniture, and lighting. The design concepts that would be implemented by the Specific Plan are described below and shown in Figure 2-7. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Pian Project 2-11 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 id E 4- E ) E w U) o L� E o 0 0 CL cc QD (D C: a) U -0 (cl 0- -S 0 0 I mill, I I CL m 6i 0 0 U) C 0 p (1) o C� LLJ EL C) N CL U) o 0 0 id E 4- E ) E w U) o L� E o 0 0 CL cc QD (D C: a) U -0 (cl 0- -S 0 0 I mill, I I CL m 6i 0 0 U) Mq � B© + Mf , ■ / § CO / ƒ \ � ( C) J \ / \ \ C) 0 Description Development Standards The infill development and revitalizing development implemented by the Specific Plan would be guided by development standards that are included in the proposed Specific Plan that address building scale and relationships; the treatment, improvement, and use of public rights-of-way including landscaping and public amenities; setback requirements; building types; and open space requirements. The Specific Plan standards address lot size, residential density, building orientation, building heights, walls and fences, refuse facilities, storage and loading facilities, ground floor retail areas, solar panels, and other zoning issues. Active Retail Frontage The Specific Plan would implement active retail frontage areas, which provide retail uses on the ground floor level, combined with streetscape improvements and pedestrian amenities to enhance the pedestrian -oriented retail lining the following street segments: • Maine Avenue between Clark Street and Ramona Boulevard; • North side of Ramona Boulevard between Cesar Chavez Drive and Downing Avenue; and • South side of Ramona Boulevard between Sterling Way and Bogart Avenue. Streetscape Improvements Streetscape improvements include providing benches, trash receptacles, tree grates, landscaping, and lighting to better define the character of the Specific Plan area and give it a coherent look. The theme for the landscape plan is the provision of drought -tolerant plants that would appropriate for the City. Tree types for each street are recommended as part of the proposed Specific Plan. Street furniture is proposed as part of the Specific Plan to help unify the area as well as provide essential seating, trash receptacles and bicycle racjcs to draw people into the area. Street lighting would be installed as a part of individual projects within the Specific Plan area to create an appealing walkable environment. Lighting provides spatial definition to the sidewalk, adds ambiance to neighborhood settings, and a sense of security. The light fixtures shall adhere to guidelines set forth by the Dark Sky Association to protect the area's view of stars. In addition, the Specific Plan requires that lighting for non-residential uses shall be appropriately designed, located, and shielded to ensure that they do not negatively impact the residential uses in the development or any adjacent residential uses. The Specific Plan would provide consistent wayfinding signs throughout the Specific Plan area, to incorporate a consistent design with a coordinated color palette to create a unique theme that is both easily recognizable and coordinated with an overall comprehensive signage program for the City of Baldwin Park. The directional signage would be provided at the Metrolink Station, City Hall, the Arts and Recreation Center, the new Arts Park, Morgan Park, public facilities and public parking. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 2-14 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 2. Open Space/ Arts Park The Specific Plan encourages development of new open spaces in privately -owned plazas and courtyards in new retail, residential, commercial and mixed use settings. Small gathering spaces and places within new developments would to complement the existing open space in the Specific Plan area and provide informal and small scale open space opportunities, including outdoor dining. The proposed Specific Plan proposes development of a new Arts Park to host community events and create a museum without walls for performance art, sculpture, and temporary two- dimensional art displays. The Arts Park would be located across Maine Avenue and would have direct links and views to City Hall to better connect City Hall, both physically and visually, to the surrounding Downtown area. Amenities in the Arts Park may include street furniture, landscaped open space, public art, a water feature, small performance space and concessions. Circulation Ramona Boulevard The improvements to the circulation system that would be implemented by the proposed Specific Plan area shown in Figure 2-8. Implementation of the Specific Plan would expand and improve the circulation within the 230 foot right-of-way of Ramona Boulevard, to provide a boulevard that serves vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle transportation modes. The public rights-of-way containing diagonal parking (or parking bays) along Ramona Boulevard would be reconfigured. One row of diagonal parking comprising approximately 150 spaces would be removed and relocated elsewhere in the Downtown area (as further described below in the parking description), and the sidewalks would be widened. The row of diagonal parking adjacent to the buildings would be retained. This would create a wider landscaped pedestrian walkway adjacent to the buildings and along the length of Ramona Boulevard, while retaining convenient parking adjacent to commercial land uses. Pedestrian connections would be provided across Ramona Boulevard, improving linkages from north of Ramona Boulevard to the Metrolink Station and Morgan Park. These would include: • Intersection improvements with upgraded (wider and more visible) crosswalks; • Installation of pedestrian -friendly signal timing (including countdown timers); • Establishing and signing wayfinding routes; and • Providing a signalized midblock crossing of Ramona Boulevard between Maine Avenue and Bogart Avenue. To facilitate bicycle circulation, Ramona Boulevard would be restriped to provide a wider bicycle lane and retain, but narrow, the two existing traffic lanes in each direction. In addition, driveways onto Ramona Boulevard would be modified from the existing 45 degree angle (which encourages faster traffic) to a 90 degree angle to slow traffic. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 2-15 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 1-3 m r coE CD cv U) w C C U. O co 4- O (z U � U U N P� Cf) V O Q3 C O 2 O^ O O C nn� LL O Y Q C fY] A A A ce4 C O O m 2, Project Description Maine Avenue, Pacific Avenue, and Sterling Way The Specific Plan circulation improvements on Main Avenue at Pacific Avenue and Sterling Way would simplify the circulation, create a potential development site, and provide a location for a new Arts Park on the west side of City Hall. • The section of Maine Avenue between Pacific Avenue and Sterling Way located opposite of City Hall would be vacated. Sterling Way would be realigned eastward at Ramona Boulevard from the current T - intersection to a four-way intersection with Cesar Chavez Drive. • A new alley would be developed at the rear of the commercial uses fronting on Ramona Boulevard between Maine Avenue and Sterling Way to maintain local access and deliveries. Metrolink Facilities The Specific Plan includes coordination with Metrolink for installation of full quad -gate crossings that extend across the entire street (unlike the current half gates that only extend across half the street) on Pacific Avenue west of the Metrolink Station, and on Downing Avenue east of the station. The full quad gates would improve traffic safety because their length would cross the entire track, thereby preventing vehicles to cross the tracks while the gates are down. Pedestrian Circulation Network A network of alleys and off-street walkways would be established to provide an additional circulation method and encourage pedestrian activity as a mode of transportation. The pedestrian circulation network would connect key places in the Downtown area and provide a new mid - block walking route. The pedestrian network is shown in Figure 2-9 and would include: • A new mid -block connection on Ramona Boulevard between Bogart Avenue and Maine Avenue to enhance access to the Metrolink Station; • Enhanced sidewalks and pedestrian landscaping along Bogart Avenue between Pacific Avenue and Downing Avenue; • Pedestrian improvements at the entrance to the Metrolink Station at the intersection of Ramona Boulevard and Downing Avenue, and at the track crossing of Pacific Avenue at the south end of the Metrolink Station that would include clearly defined pedestrian paths, better fencing of the tracks, and improved pedestrian control gates. • Enhanced crosswalks (including highly visible zebra crosswalk striping and/or paving); • Pedestrian -friendly signal timing (adding countdown pedestrian signals and extending the pedestrian crossing or "green" time where feasible); • Curb extensions installation; and • Establishing and signing wayfinding routes for pedestrians to get to civic locations. �aiawi,e.......,,. --------- . _ ..........-_ ........-------------------- . ----- .,.,.. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 2-17 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 mN o C:, Ce) m C m u' ctS U (n U_ _ U c 0 6 0 C O L' O E � d c m E T m 0 o a, Y � U > o a, m C C O O (D m O (n U C o ■ m ■ ■ �rd. C (6 Y V1 c6 N V) a) Y N a O NO UO o ° > aj cs O O O Q M1'17i E z Er ®r ■ r ■ ■ ■■r c C J O C a9 C y I's a5 m 4 p C 73 m C � U o N m O o U 1 � 1 I 0 0 Bicycle Circulation The Specific Plan would establish a bicycle circulation network, which is shown in Figure 2-10, and includes a combination of Class II and Class III facilities that connect Downtown to adjacent neighborhoods. Ramona Boulevard would be restriped to provide a wider bicycle lane (six feet compared to the existing four -foot lanes) that would be colored for visibility, and a four -foot striped separation from the moving traffic lanes would be provided to calm traffic and enhance bicycle safety. The Specific Plan includes the following bicycle routes as included in the General Plan: Baldwin Park Boulevard south of Ramona Boulevard, Sterling Way, and Pacific Avenue south of Maine Avenue. In addition the Specific Plan establishes bicycle routes on Maine Avenue, Bogart Avenue, Downing Avenue south of Ramona Boulevard, and Central Avenue. Bicycle parking facilities are proposed at numerous locations around Downtown to facilitate the use of bicycles. General planned bicycle parking facility Iocations are shown in Figure 6, and include areas at the Metrolink Station, major bus stops, mid -block locations, and major commercial destinations. Vehicle Parking To reflect the characteristics of Downtown and transit -oriented development, the following parking requirement adjustments are included in the Specific Plan: • Parking requirements for commercial uses shall be 75 percent of the citywide requirement in Subchapter 153.150. Parking requirements for residential multi -family uses shall be 1 space per bedroom and one guest space per 10 units. To encourage people to park once in one location and then walk around Downtown to multiple destinations, shared parking shall be allowed as per Subchapter 153.150 and subject to a Shared Parking Report with the following additional provisions: • Shared parking may also apply to public parking facilities. • The distance within which off-site code -required parking can be located shall be 1,000 feet. • The City shall encourage the owners of private parking facilities to make their facilities available to all Downtown users. Shared parking will be evaluated per project and may be included as a part of the City's project conditions of approval. Water Infrastructure The water demand for domestic water usage and fire flow that would be generated by build out of the proposed Specific Plan would require the water line on Bogart Avenue to be improved, and this improvement is included in the proposed project. The existing six-inch water line on Bogart Avenue that runs from Clark Street to Ramona Boulevard with build out of the project would be upgraded to an eight -inch line. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 2-19 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 ro ro :� C O cd J Y Y Cd m Y ro m v, Co W m Co ro � (� 0 m m coop LO T — 0 1 yO M N i a) � � Z W � ❑ m LL O W U a) a)sU _ cn U ❑ a) O U >� U S O m C 0 O � ❑ U) O ro D- B- p CL a Cd m 2. Project Description 2.4 Project Goals and Objectives As guided by the Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan, the City "seeks to strengthen the economic vitality and aesthetic character of the Downtown through the establishment of a mixed use pedestrian district which builds on Livable Communities principles and techniques." The purpose of the proposed Specific Plan is to bring transit oriented development to the Downtown portion of the City, which would provide Downtown housing opportunities and improve access to all modes of transportation, including transit, pedestrian linkages and bicycling. The goals for the Downtown TOD Specific Plan include: • Create a mix of uses with residential and employment densities that support transit use. • Offer a range of housing options proximate to transit. • Leverage the location of the Metrolink Station to bring revitalizing activities to Downtown; • Create vibrant and diverse commercial corridors that provide a strong community identity and sense of place in the heart of town; • Design a pedestrian -friendly environment with well-designed buildings, attractive streetscapes, and engaging public spaces. • Create multi -modal streets accommodate pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicles. • Increase level of goods and services available to residents of the community; • Provide new employment and housing opportunities; • Attract shoppers from outside the community; and • Strengthen the City's tax base. The objectives of the proposed project, which have been identified to meet the goals listed above, are to identify land use options that include increased housing densities and mixed uses, as well as create pedestrian linkages between the station, community facilities and major recreation, retail, and residential nodes of activity. 2.5 Reviews and Approvals This EIR may be used by various governmental decision -makers for discretionary permits and actions that are necessary or may be requested in connection with the Downtown TOD Specific Plan Project, including the following: • City of Baldwin Park General Plan Amendment, including amendments to the Land Use Element per the changes shown in Table 2-5 and amendments to the Circulation Element to include the changes to the roadway and pedestrian facilities described above; • Amendment to the Zoning Code to change the zoning designations pursuant to the Specific Plan (shown in Table 2-5) is required for the proposed Specific Plan; BaldwmParkTO.............. ... .... �„_,.................... D Specific Plan Project 2-21 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 2. Project Descri • Development Agreements may, be required for future development projects in the Specific Plan area; • Conditional Use Permits may be required for future development projects in the Specific Plan area; • Other discretionary actions as may be required for construction and/or operation of future projects within the Specific Plan area. Cumulative impacts refer to the combined effect of project impacts with the impacts of other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable probable future projects. Both CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines require that cumulative impacts be analyzed in an E1R. As set forth in the CEQA Guidelines Section 15130(b), "the discussion of cumulative impacts shall reflect the severity of the impacts and their likelihood of occurrence, but the discussion need not provide as great detail as is provided for the effects attributable to the project alone." According to Section 15355 of the CEQA Guidelines, "'Cumulative impacts' refer to two or more individual effects which, when considered together, are considerable or which compound or increase other environmental impacts. a) The individual effects may be changes resulting from a single project or a number of separate projects. b) The cumulative impact from several projects is the change in the environment which results from the incremental impact of the project when added to other closely related past, present, and reasonably foreseeable probable future projects. Cumulative impacts can result from individually minor but collectively significant projects taking place over a period of time. " Therefore, the cumulative discussion in this E1R focuses on whether the impacts of the proposed Specific Plan project are cumulatively considerable within the context of impacts caused by other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects. CEQA Guidelines Section 15130(b)(1) states that the information utilized in an analysis of cumulative impacts should come from one of the following: • A list of past, present and probable future projects producing related or cumulative impacts, including those projects outside the control of the lead agency; or • A summary of projections contained in an adopted local, regional or statewide plan or related planning document that describes or evaluates conditions contributing to the cumulative effect. Cumulative impact discussions for each issue area are provided in each E1R topic section. Table 2-6 provides a list of the past, present, and reasonably foreseeable projects that are considered in this Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 2-22 ESA P D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 2. P cumulative environmental analysis, and Figure 2-11, Related Project Locations provides the location of these projects. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 2-23 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 (L a Y a C .0 m EO `) U) O LL W N CO O N N a a) 7 C a) m Z as CD N (n m O M O O 6 0 In V) 117 lb a C CU N Y O m oD LL O L6 In l9 cc) m N W C LL g N co c m D N a) Y T E m LLN cC_ D r` 0 U) t` O V 0 O C r` 0 N r O ti 0 O 0 0 O co 0 OD 0 O 0 O N 9. O LIDti U') O w a C N m a- < Q O C O a 0 C m d U U m n r C: m U C ro C Y co Y IU IL g m m C m �r O) c a ED f6 co D a C C J- 0 O m a 3 a CO m CDN U) C o to c m ro aNi ro 7 ca C_ �U E a) o E 0 0 U U O N O O) X) 16 CL c .3 a m m a c6 0 m m 0 m 0 M V a C ro 1D N v N 15 m IL C m Co ai 2: > Q _U cr J V 7 N C_to 7 E O O L N .0 d m U O fes/) N d0' M In O 0 Y m Y D- 0 - c: ac a ; Co m a) 0 C j > C Q > a) Q a) +0 0 J Cl)IN Lo N O Y m C m m a) 0 C > Q U m CL m Eu U C � a) E af U � N O O 'r a m C 0 U ai 7 C > Q 2 O a C m U) O I co r. E 7 C C m E _ m O'', m a m yc � 2 U N E o O O O O C) O In O C) O N (O (t LO ro C O w E 2 t a) CLU .a LL r C v5 U D) > O_ O o E n a) 7e' o O O O O t` a) ro a c a) cuT a a) a) CL U) O O a) C (1) 'U rn C .a 0. O L U) m C O m m a c (O a) ro a T 3 L 0 Q O O N N C O I � w N C (`0 a C C($ a) m U a) N as (0 a) a C ti U) A2 -v- (D m `m c) LL Q C_ O l J 'O ED C. ca ID 0 � N C m L U) a 16 m 0 c Ad � ro d a � O O C U (D O LL C 0 M CHAP TER 3 Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3.1 Aesthetics Introduction This section describes existing aesthetic and visual resources within and visible from the Specific Plan area and the potential impact of the proposed project on those resources. In particular, descriptions of existing visual characteristics, both within and in the vicinity of the Specific Plan area, are presented, and potential project -related impacts to aesthetic and visual resources, such as increased light and glare or impacts to scenic views, evaluated. 3.1.1 Environmental Setting Regional Character Baldwin Park is situated between the San Gabriel Foothills and Los Angeles National Forest to the north, and the Los Angeles Basin to the south, east, and west. In general, the region including Baldwin Park is dominated by suburbanized landscapes that consist of shopping centers and malls; freeways; streets; residential neighborhoods with schools, churches, and parks; commercial and industrial development, with occasional parks and preserved open space. On -Site and Surrounding Visual Elements The Specific Plan area is relatively flat and consists predominantly of medium -density residential (single- and multi -family homes), commercial, government, and industrial uses in mostly one- and two-story wood -framed buildings with stucco or wood exteriors in neutral colors in a built -out urbanized environment. With a few exceptions, such as Baldwin Park City Hall and Metrolink Station parking structure, building heights do not tend to exceed approximately 25 feet in height and there is no dominant architectural character defining the area; rather, the architecture throughout the Specific Plan area tends to be nondescript. Ramona Boulevard, Baldwin Park Boulevard, and Maine Avenue comprise the core of Downtown Baldwin Park. Ramona and Baldwin Park Boulevards are wide four -lane major arterials with some landscaping and street trees, but with few pedestrian amenities, such as adequate sidewalks and benches (see Figure 3.1-1, photos 1 and 2). Visually, Ramona Boulevard, around which the Specific Plan area is centered, divides Downtown. Maine Avenue Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Protect 3.11-1 ESA / 130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3, Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures .__----. ........ _� _.� - 3 1 Aesthetics is also four lanes, but it has no center median and is narrower than Ramona and Baldwin Park Boulevards. Buildings along Ramona Boulevard, Baldwin Park Boulevard, and Maine Avenue are generally no taller than two stories and commercial uses, specifically one-story automobile - oriented commercial buildings, dominate these portions of the Specific Plan area. Commercial Development The development pattern and architecture of the commercial uses includes single -story square or rectangular buildings with flat or partially hipped gable roofs. With few exceptions, buildings are sided with neutral (white, beige, peach) stucco and roofs are clad with red tiles. Some exterior ornamentation exists in the form of decorated cornices, colonnades, and/or prominent facades. Deep setbacks are prevalent in the Specific Plan area with large parking lots separating the main strip development from the roadways with smaller stand-alone structures fronting the roadway (see Figure 3.1-2, photos 1 and 2). There is an exception to this commercial development pattern for some portions of the Specific Plan area, including along Ramona Boulevard from approximately Cesar Chavez Boulevard to Maine Avenue, and along the west side of Maine Avenue from Ramona Boulevard to approximately Palm Avenue. In these portions of the Specific Plan area, smaller shops line the road and the development pattern is somewhat reminiscent of a traditional main street. Except along the east side of Maine Avenue where buildings are more modern, the buildings are older and of a smaller format compared to the more modern strip commercial development that is prevalent elsewhere. Although the stores are connected in a typical strip pattern, each storefront contains a unique fapade with varying heights, siding materials (stucco or brick), and colors. Awnings of varying shape and color are also intermittently present along the storefronts. Setbacks are non-existent or shallow—along Maine Avenue, only a sidewalk separates the roadway from the storefront, and along Ramona Boulevard, a narrow strip of diagonal parking separates the buildings and the primary roadway. Landscaping throughout the commercial areas of the Specific Plan area generally consists of ground cover (grass) and short shrubs along mediums and at entrance ways, with small, ornamental trees or tall palm trees placed throughout the parking lots. Signage styles are also typical of strip commercial development and include monument signs at the entrance ways to the development as well as wall signs on the buildings demarcating the individual stores. Residential Development Residential development within the Specific Plan area is limited to small multi -family complexes along the north side of Palmrose Street between Maine and Bogart Avenues, single- family residences along Bogart Avenue south of Palmrose Street, single-family homes along Badilla Street between Downing Avenue and Lozano Drive, some multi -family housing along Downing Avenue between Pacific Avenue and Central Avenue, and single-family residences along Sterling Way roughly between Baldwin Park Avenue and Pacific Avenue. Most of the Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.1-2 ESA 1130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 Photo 1 i View o1 Ramona Boulevard, looking east Photo 2: View o1 Ramona Boulevard, looking west _.. ___..m. Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan EIR - 130953 SOURCE: The Arroyo Group Figure 3.1-1 Photos Photo 1: Example of strip eammemW dovelopmad within the Specific Plan arse Photo 2., Example of deep setbacks with parking fronting the street Baldwin Park Downtown TOO Spaeft Plan EIR. 130953 SOURCE: The Arroyo Group Figure 3.1-2 Photos 3. Environmental SeWflg Impacts and Millo ltrdln Measures ......... „a - .. - ,..,. 3.1 flrlsthmetuos single-family residences in the Specific Plan area are modest, single -story homes surrounded by small fenced yards. Architectural styles appear to be individual to each structure. Yards in the rear are not completely visible from the street; partial views reveal rear yards with landscaping and additional structures, including sheds, garages or additional dwelling units. Fences include metal and stucco fences and some chain-link fencing. Paint finishes are largely neutral. Residential streets tend to include mature street trees and plants. Some residential blocks include street trees; on other blocks, trees are mostly found in front yards or can be seen in backyards. Industrial Development A small cluster of industrial development exists in the eastern portion of the Specific Plan area. This area is characterized by a small collection of nondescript single -story warehouse -type structures area and some outdoor storage areas that are enclosed with black wrought iron or metal chain-link (and sometimes razor -wire) fencing (see Figure 3.1-3, photo 1). Many buildings have no setback from the street. There is very little landscaping along Alderson Avenue, and on -street parking and parking lots are used minimally, giving the streets an empty and unused appearance. This portion of the Specific Plan area also contains a large early 1900s - era warehouse building that was historically used as a Red Car maintenance building (see Figure 3.1-3, photo 2). The approximately four-story red brick building features a gable roof with tall open archways on all sides of the building. Given the building's height, massing and distinct architectural style, it is a prominent visual structure compared to the surrounding low - profile industrial uses. However, the building is in need of repair and is surrounded by razor - wire fencing, which gives the site a blighted appearance. Civic Uses Civic uses in the Specific Plan area include Morgan Park, the Baldwin Park City Hall, the Arts and Recreation Center, and the Transit Center Parking Structure. Morgan Park occupies a visually prominent location within the Specific Plan area on the northeast corner of Baldwin Park and Ramona Boulevards. Morgan Park provides a different visual experience compared to its immediate surroundings of strip commercial development. Broad, green lawns, rows of lush trees, and colorful children's playgrounds are set in the foreground views while the large Spanish Colonial -style community center featuring a prominent rotunda is visible in the background (see Figure 3.1-4, photo 1). Baldwin Park City Hall is located on the triangular block bounded by Ramona Avenue on the north, Maine/Pacific Avenue on the west, and Bogart Avenue on the south. Unlike Morgan Park, City Hall is positioned behind commercial uses on Ramona Boulevard with its primary entrance located along Maine/Pacific Avenue. The three-story, C-shaped building is oriented to the west and includes a modern architectural style with nods to southwestern details, including alternating bands of beige and gray stucco siding, a red tiled roof, and a horizontal bell tower that is reminiscent of Mission style architecture atop the roof of the southern wing of the building. The primary entrance is introduced by a large, landscaped plaza with a fountain and brick walkways that lead up stairs to the main doors (see Figure 3.1-4, photo 2). Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.1-5 ESA 1130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 Photo 1: fxwn* of Industrial development In Specifle Plan area FITI,�� o aM�� Baldwin Park Downtown T Specific Plan EIR. 130953 SOURCE: The Arroyo Group Figure 3.1-3 Photos Photo 1: Morgan Park Community Center Photo 2: Baldwin Park City Hell - Galdwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan EIR . 130953 SOURCE: The Arroyo Group Figure 3.1-4 Photos 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3.1 Aesthetics The Arts and Recreation Center is adjacent to City Hall, and fronts Pacific Avenue at the intersection with Bogart Avenue. It is a two-story, concrete building with Art Deco details along the front and side fagades. The Transit Center Parking Structure sits behind Arts and Recreation Center on Bogart Avenue, across the street from the Metrolink tracks. The recently completed five -story parking structure is a large, rectangular, concrete building that includes a pedestrian bridge over Bogart Avenue and the Metrolink train tracks to connect the garage to the station. The parking structure is painted with varying shades of taupe and includes some architectural detailing that subtly mirrors the Art Deco detailing of the adjacent Arts and Recreation Center (see Figure 3.1-5, photo 1). Metrolink Station Within the Specific Plan area, the Metrolink tracks run adjacent to Bogart Avenue and, after crossing Ramona Boulevard, continue adjacent to Alderson Avenue. The primary pedestrian entrance to the Metrolink Station is located at the southwestern corner of Ramona Boulevard and Bogart Avenue and is demarcated by a small plaza with artistic tiling as well as a stone arch civic art sculpture (Figure 3.1-5, photo 2). Despite these demarcations, the station itself is somewhat visually obscured from Ramona Boulevard as it is positioned behind buildings and landscaping. The station is an open air platform that includes arched shelters and surface parking adjacent to the tracks. Light and Glare Nighttime lighting is associated with the existing urban development is present within the Specific Plan area and in the surrounding area and includes street lights, building fagade lighting, and illumination from vehicle headlights. Sensitive receptors relative to glare include residents living in the Specific Plan area, and motorists and pedestrians passing through the Specific Plan area on the streets. There are no buildings, structures, or facilities in the Specific Plan area that presently generate substantial glare since most of the buildings are constructed of non -reflective materials and have few windows. Surface parking lots are currently the only substantial source of glare from sunlight or exterior light reflecting from cars. Surrounding Scenic Resources The Specific Plan area comprises the majority of Baldwin Park's Downtown and is largely surrounded by residential uses. As discussed above, the Sart Gabriel Mountains comprise northerly views for many communities in the San Gabriel Valley. From within the Specific Plan area, these views are particularly prominent along north -south corridors, including Maine Avenue and Baldwin Park Boulevard. In addition, views of the San Gabriel Mountains are available from Downing Avenue or Alderson Avenue where the buildings and street trees are generally of lower profile and more interspersed. Views of the San Gabriel Mountains are also intermittently available along Ramona Boulevard, where views of the mountains are available over the tops of the predominantly low-rise buildings; however, these views are often obscured by intervening buildings or landscaping. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.1-8 ESA 1130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 Photo 1: Transit Center Parking Structure Photo 2: Civic Art Sculpture at Metrolink Station Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan EIR . 130953 SOURCE: The Arroyo Group Figure 3.1-5 Photos 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures ......... 3.1 Aesthetics 3.1.2 Regulatory Setting State Scenic Highway Program Established in 1963, California's Scenic Highway Program is administered by Caltrans and is designed to preserve and protect scenic highway corridors from changes that would diminish their aesthetic value. A highway may be designated scenic depending upon how much of the natural landscape can be seen by travelers, the scenic quality of the landscape, and the extent to which development intrudes upon the traveler's enjoyment of the view. The city or county in which the highway is located must adopt a Corridor Protection Program that consists of ordinances, zoning and/or planning policies that would preserve the scenic quality of the corridor, or they must document such regulations that already exist in various portions of local codes. A highway may also be listed as "eligible" for designation as a scenic highway before. Local Baldwin Park General Plan Urban Design Element Adopted as part of the Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan in 2002, the stated purpose of the Urban Design Element (Design Element) is to address "the City's visual and aesthetic resources, focusing on the quality and character of public areas and private development in Baldwin Park. It builds upon the Land Use Element." Its stated scope is to define "Downtown and other major districts, neighborhoods, freeway corridors, boulevards, and open spaces with distinctive appearances and qualities" (City of Baldwin Park, 2002). This element addresses six major goals: (1) Provide urban design opportunities for gateway entrances in Baldwin Park; (2) Establish a positive image on the I-10 San Bernardino Freeway corridor; (3) Establish Downtown as a pedestrian -oriented zone; (4) Enhance the aesthetic quality of development in the City; and (5) Improve streetscape environments to enhance the city's environmental conditions; and (6) Enhance residential neighborhoods in Baldwin Park. The Design Element specifically identifies streets that should be given high priority for upgrading the City's image; they include Baldwin Park Boulevard, Ramona Boulevard, Pacific Avenue, and Maine Avenue.1 Upgrading, according to the Design Element, should include the following streetscape improvements: • Street trees; • Underground utilities; Baldwin Park TDD Specific Plan Project 3.1-10 ESA 1130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Selfinp, Impacts and Mitigrtt0l, Measures 1 Aesthetics - 3 ki7tip e ._ th s • Street furniture; • Enhanced paving; • Graphics and signage; and • Lighting. Street furniture and fixtures (pole masts and arms for street lighting, signalization and signage, bus benches, bollards, news racks, planters and tree grates) should follow a consistent design. Enhanced paving should be distinctive and used for all future crosswalks. A consistent style for graphics should also be adopted that includes size, lettering, colors, symbols, and logos. Distinctive lighting should be adopted to accent lighting for landscaping and "key landmark buildings, decorative pedestrian lighting fixtures, and the use of high-pressure sodium bulbs to create warm illumination tones" (City of Baldwin Park, 2002). In addition, the Design Element defines Downtown as the portion of Ramona Boulevard between Baldwin Park Boulevard and Bogart Avenue, and the section of Maine Avenue between Ramona Boulevard and Clark Street. It goes on to state: Currently, Downtown lacks a pedestrian -friendly environment because the expansive Ramona Boulevard width tends to divide the north and south sides of Downtown. There is also a lack of direct access to the Metrolink Station, City Hall, and to Morgan Park. Downtown has all the elements to be a pedestrian -friendly environment. The challenge is to link the key Downtown elements, calm traffic, and improve the aesthetic image through design and quality materials. The Design Element specifically notes that to enhance the concept of a pedestrian -friendly Downtown, "key Downtown elements are recommended to be visually and functionally linked in order to foster pedestrian activity between the commercial core, City Hall, Morgan Park, Post Office, future mixed-use housing, the Metrolink Station and other Key Downtown destinations" (City of Baldwin Park, 2002). The identified pedestrian improvements include mid -block crossings; paseos; colonnades, and Metrolink connections. In residential neighborhoods, the Design Element recommends fence alternatives, such as hedges. The following are goals and policies that are relevant to the proposed Project. Goal 3.0 Establish Downtown as a pedestrian -friendly environment. Policy 3.1 Define Downtown as a pedestrian -overlay zone and require that new uses and buildings enhance pedestrian activity through the use of: Walls which are aesthetically treated by the use of color, textured materials, offset planes, recessed entries and windows, columns, and other architectural details to provide visual interest to pedestrians Baldwin Draft Env onmark OD S„ pecifio Pian Project 3.1-11 ESA / 130953 Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures ------- ......... „ .... 3,1 Aesthetics • Extensive landscaping, including trees, flowering shrubs and groundcover • Pedestrian amenities, such as street furniture, trash receptacles and signage oriented to the pedestrian • Design amenities related to the street -level, such as awnings, colonnades, arcades and paseos • Visual access to the interior of buildings Policy 3.2 Develop a streetscape program, including signage, undergrounding of utility lines, and street tree planting, to improve the appearance of Maine Avenue. Establish a district gateway entrance into Downtown by extending Maine Avenue streetscape concept from Downtown north to the Performing Arts Center. Policy 3.3 Examine potential transit opportunities which could be developed to link this area with the Metrolink station. Policy 3.4 Establish a pedestrian linkage between the Metrolink Station and Downtown. Connect to Downtown by establishing a street promenade from Railroad Avenue to Ramona Boulevard Enhance the west pedestrian connection on Downing Avenue to City Hall and Downtown Evaluate the establishment of a pedestrian crossing over the rail right-of-way to connect the Metrolink Station to Downtown. Alternatives to consider include: at grade crossing, pedestrian bridge and second level pedestrian way connecting a building. Policy 3.5 Create an active "paseo" in the courtyard of City Hall to connect to Downtown. Continue the colonnade concept on Maine Avenue to the south side of Ramona Boulevard connecting to the City Hall courtyard. Provide a paseo between the City Hall courtyard to the street promenade, and enhance with landscaping, paving and lighting. Policy 3.6 Establish a mid -block pedestrian connection between the north and south side of Ramona Boulevard with a pedestrian activated signal. Utilize traffic calming techniques such as enhanced paving within the crossing to provide a visual and auditory change in surfaces. Policy 3.7 Extend the Maine Avenue streetscape south on Pacific Avenue to Dalton Wash. Policy 3.8 Establish public graphics and signage for Downtown. Develop Downtown logo Develop public graphics and signage program for Downtown Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.1-12 ESA 1130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental ettirtg, Iimpalsas and Mitigation Measures �.,.. 3 1 A trr6hefirHs�� Policy 3.9 Consider Downtown as a museum without walls by creating areas for public art such as murals, sculptures, and fountains. Policy 3.10 Complete streetscape improvements on the south side of Ramona Boulevard Provide street trees, street furniture and aesthetic wall and fencing design for the Corridor. Complete undergrounding of the utility lines on Ramona Boulevard. Goal 4.0 Enhance the aesthetic quality of development in the City. Policy 4.1 Require that signage on commercial structures be compatible and integrated within the structure's architecture. Policy 4.2 Review and revise, as necessary, the City's development standards to improve the quality of new development and to protect public health and safety. Goal 5.0 Promote urban forestry concepts to enhance the environmental conditions in the city by providing shade, shelter from inclement weather, improved air quality, and aesthetic improvements to neighborhoods. Policy 5.1 Develop a city-wide master street tree plan. Policy 5.2 Coordinate street tree planting with street widening and sidewalk improvement projects. Policy 5.3 Maintain and conserve existing street trees, and require replacement when trees are removed. Policy 5.4 Establish street tree management plan and policies to monitor, maintain and replace the City's street trees. Policy 5.5 Encourage residents to be active in taking care of their parkway trees. Provide educational programs and materials in the care of trees and concepts of urban forestry. Policy 5.6 Establish a priority plan and program to underground utility lines at key areas in the City to provide tree planting opportunities. Goal 6.0 Enhance the neighborhood environments within Baldwin Park. Policy 6.1 Provide guidelines for aesthetically pleasing front yard fencing and fence hedge plantings to minimize the utility chain-link gated look. Policy 6.2 Buffer residential from non-residential uses with aesthetically pleasing walls, landscaping and/or fencing. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.1-13 ESA 1190953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3, Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures ........ 31 Aesthetics Policy 6.3 Provide educational programs and materials for residential landscaping and water conservation methods. Provide plant list suitable for Baldwin Park's horticultural environment. Policy 6.4 Within residential streets, select street trees which will provide substantial amount of shade and provide canopies over the street at maturity. Baldwin Park General Plan Land Use Element The Baldwin Park General Plan Land Use Element includes some policies and goals relevant to visual quality in the Downtown. These policies complement goals and policies already identified in the Design Element. Policy 2.5 Require that multi -family, commercial and industrial development provide adequate buffers (such as decorative walls and landscaped setbacks) at the designated boundaries with adjacent uses to prevent impacts on residences due to noise, traffic, parking, light and glare, and differences in scale; to ensure privacy; and to provide visual compatibility. Policy 2.6 Require that the external lighting of commercial and industrial properties be confined to the site to avoid adverse impacts on adjacent land uses due to light spillover or glare. Policy 3.7 As part of neighborhood beautification efforts, provide street trees and landscaping in the public right-of-way. Policy 10.2 Improve the physical appearance of Ramona Boulevard with street trees, a landscaped median, and other features to encourage motorists to stop and shop, Baldwin Park Municipal Code Section 153.140.040 Light and Glare Section 153.140.040 establishes light and glare performance standards for development within the city, including standards related to acceptable candle-power of lighting, the height of lighting support structures, lighting shielding, and sign lighting. Specifically, Section 153.140.040 mandates that candle-power shall be the minimum necessary in order to achieve the purpose of the light and that all lights shall be directed, oriented and shielded to prevent light from shining onto adjacent properties, onto public rights-of-way, and into driveway areas in a manner that would obstruct motorists' vision. 3.1.3 Thresholds of Significance In accordance with Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, the project could have a significant impact on aesthetics if it would: • Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista; • Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway; Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.1-14 ESA 1130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Settng Inijiacts and Mili,gatbon Measures -- ......... .. I Aesthotl.s • Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings; • Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. As described in the NOP/Initial Study prepared for this project (Appendix A) the Specific Plan area is not within the viewshed of a state scenic highway and this issue requires no further analysis in the EIR. Under CEQA, an impact on views is considered significant if a view of a public scenic vista, scenic resource, public object of aesthetic significance, or valued view is impeded or obstructed from apublic vantage point. Views enjoyed from a particular private vantage point are generally not protected. As the Court of Appeal held in Topanga Beach Renters Assn. v. Department of General Services (1976) 58 Cal.App.3d 188, 195, "[t]he issue is not whether [the Project] will adversely affect particular persons, but whether [the Project] will adversely affect the environment of persons in general." 3.1.4 Methodology The project proposes to redevelop Downtown Baldwin Park with pedestrian -friendly and transit - oriented uses with the intent of creating a strong urban character and identity. This would include new architectural and design standards, signage, landscaping, incorporation of Complete Streets principles, and the possibility of buildings that could reach 50 feet in height, approximately four stories in height, in some portions of the Specific Plan area. The potential aesthetic impacts of the proposed project are evaluated considering such factors as the scale, mass, proportion, orientation, architectural detailing, and landscaping/buffering associated with the design of buildings that would occur under the proposed project as compared to existing conditions and to determine if those changes would result in adverse impacts on the aesthetic resources identified in the significance thresholds. This analysis takes into consideration viewer sensitivity or concern, which is based, in part, on the visibility of resources in the landscape, the proximity of viewers to the visual resources, the relative elevation of viewers to the visual resources, the frequency and duration of views, the number of viewers, and the types and expectations of the individuals and viewer groups. Generally, visual sensitivity increases with an increase in total number of viewers, the frequency of viewing, and the duration of views. Visual sensitivity is generally higher for views seen by people who are driving for pleasure, engaging in recreational activities or who are homeowners. Sensitivity is generally lower for people commuting to and from work. 3.1.5 Impact Analysis Impact 3.1-1: The proposed project could have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.1-15 ESA 1130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures ---- ......... 3.1 Aesthetics A scenic vista is usually a view of a valued resource, such as waterways, the ocean, hills, valleys, or mountains. The Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan, through its Land Use, Urban Design, and Open Space and Conservation Elements, does not identify or designate scenic vistas or viewsheds in Baldwin Park. Scenic views are limited in the Specific Plan area due to surrounding development and the relatively flat topography of the site. Baldwin Park is an urbanized community and, as a result, views to the south, east, and west are generally of adjacent urban development and associated landscaping. Views could include Morgan Park, landscaping, and other elements of urban life. From the vantage point of a pedestrian or a motor vehicle from public right-of-way, views to the north are often obstructed because of existing urban development and the slight southwest trend of the topography. However, views of the San Gabriel Mountains to the north can be considered a scenic vista. The scale of the San Gabriel Mountains places the mountains in every northward view and public right-of-way. Streets in the Specific Plan area that offer a north -south orientation, or even streets with east -west orientations, provide northward views, particularly at intersections, that provide views of this mountain range. The Urban Design Element establishes the City's intent to beautify certain important streets, city entrances, and neighborhoods to enhance their aesthetic value. However, this effort would not create scenic vistas in Baldwin Park's already urbanized environment. The proposed project would result in more intense urbanization than currently exists and could introduce taller buildings than currently exist in the Specific Plan area. Buildings constructed under the proposed Specific Plan would be allowed to reach four stories, or no greater than 50 feet in height, which is approximately four stories. Buildings along the north and west perimeter of the project site would be limited in height to 55 feet and 65 feet in height and street segments that now are dominated by one-story buildings would be replaced with taller buildings. Buildings that are 50 feet in height (four stories) may obscure some of the views of the mountains to the north that are currently visible above existing buildings; however, views of the mountains would still be visible between buildings, along street right-of-way, and public walkways. Views would remain along the perimeter of the Specific Plan area, as well as between buildings, and on streets with a north -south orientation or a northeast -southwest orientation. With build out of the proposed Specific Plan the existing scenic vistas that exist from northward views within roadways and intersections that provide views of this mountain range would not be impacted. Furthermore, the proposed project would not introduce structures that would dramatically alter the views available of the Specific Plan area from other areas in the region, which is dominated by urbanized and suburban development in the foreground and the San Gabriel Mountains in the background. Therefore, the implementation of the proposed Specific Plan would result in a less than significant impact to scenic vistas. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation required Significance Determination: Less than significant Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.1-16 ESA ( 130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3.1 Aesthetics Impact 3.1-2: Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. The proposed Specific Plan would alter the existing visual character throughout the Specific Plan area by establishing a new, more concentrated development pattern throughout Downtown and, while allowing for some flexibility in terms of architectural styles and building massing, would also define new development and design standards. Design standards contained in the proposed Specific Plan provide architectural guidelines, setbacks, sidewalk widths, signage standards, a streetscape and landscaping plan (with a specific plant and tree palette identified for all street segments throughout the Specific Plan area), and lighting standards to create an environment that attracts pedestrians users. The Specific Plan would implement development that would change the area from a predominantly horizontal development pattern to more of a vertical development pattern, where residential units would be located the upper floors of a ground -floor commercial buildings. Streetscapes would change through the introduction of more landscaping and street trees in order to better define a sense of place; wider sidewalks, new lighting and the introduction of street furniture (planters, benches, bicycle parking, trash receptacles, etc), and the introduction of more public art. Gateways would be defined at major entrances to Downtown, such as at the intersection of Ramona and Baldwin Park Boulevards or Ramona Boulevard and Downing Avenue; or at minor entrances such as at Maine Avenue and Clark Street, or Pacific Avenue and Downing Avenue. Large surface parking lots would be discouraged and ultimately eliminated by moving parking lots to the mid -block areas behind building frontages. Lighting would also change in order to add ambience and increase the sense of security. Mid -block street crossing would be added along the major thoroughfares, such as Ramona Boulevard, in order to increase pedestrian connectivity throughout the entire Downtown area as well. A new Arts Park across from City Hall would also be introduced, which would increase the amount of open space in the Downtown area. The Specific Plan would enhance, not degrade, the visual character and quality of the area. The Specific Plan provides design guidelines to enhance the pedestrian experience in these areas, including the incorporation of architectural elements on the fagades, height and massing recommendations, and architectural style guidelines. The development standards, design guidelines, and streetscape improvements described above would achieve a unifying and identifying character to the Downtown area. Overall, while the Specific Plan would alter the existing visual character of the Specific Plan area, it would not substantially degrade the area or the surrounding area. Impacts related to visual quality and character would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation required Significance Determination: Less than significant Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.1-17 ESA / 130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3, Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures ........ .� ......... 3 1 Aesthetics Impact 3.1-3: Create a new source of substantial light or glare that could adversely affect day or nighttime views of the area. The proposed Specific Plan area is in an urbanized area surrounded by a mix of residential, retail, and industrial land uses. Sources of light and glare include interior and exterior building lighting, parking lot lighting, and landscape lighting. The project proposes higher density uses than currently exist, which could potentially increase ambient or "spillover" light in the Specific Plan area. Glare is defined as the sensation produced by any brightness within the visual field that is sufficiently greater than the luminance to which the eyes are adapted to cause annoyance, discomfort, or loss of vision, and can emanate from many different sources, some of which include direct sunlight, sunlight reflecting from cars or buildings, and bright outdoor or indoor lighting. Because the project proposes increased density, the project has the potential to create substantially more daytime glare than currently exists within the Specific Plan area. If not properly designed, sunlight reflecting from windows during the day could create a substantial increase in glare, and increased exterior lighting would have the potential to increase glare, as well. However, light fixtures are required to adhere to requirements of Section 153.140.040 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code related to candle-power and shielding. In addition, development standards contained within the proposed Specific Plan state that lighting shall be low mounted and downward casting in a manner that reduces light trespass onto adjacent properties. Further, Policy 2.6 of the General Plan Land Use Element requires that the external lighting be confined to the site to avoid adverse impacts on adjacent land uses due to light spillover or glare. With compliance with the Municipal Code, development standards contained within the Specific Plan, and with the City's General Plan, impacts related to increased sources of light and glare would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation required Significance Determination: Less than significant Cumulative Analysis Visual Character and Scenic Resources The cumulative aesthetics study area for the proposed Specific Plan is the viewshed (locations that can view the Specific Plan areas and locations that can be viewed from within the Specific Plan area) that the Specific Plan lies within. Of the related projects listed in Table 2-6, two are within the viewshed of the Specific Plan area and involve residential and commercial developments. Similar to the proposed land uses under the Specific Plan, the related projects Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.1-18 ESA 1130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting. Impacts and Mitigation Measures .,.m.. �. .,. — — 3.1 Aesthetics comprise infill development that would be consistent with the existing urban and developed character of the viewshed area. There are no eligible or officially designated scenic highways affected by the proposed Specific Plan. No scenic vistas have been identified by the City's General Plan and as discussed under Impact 3.1-1, no scenic vistas would be adversely impacted from implementation of the proposed Specific Plan; thus, the Specific Plan would not result in impacts that could combine with other projects to result in cumulatively considerable effects. Conversely, the Specific Plan design guidelines would result in an improvement in aesthetics and enhancement of character within the Specific Plan area. Therefore, implementation of the Specific Plan, when combined with the past, present, and reasonably foreseeable cumulative projects would not be cumulatively considerable. Light and Glare The Specific Plan area is urban and developed, and currently produces light from various urban sources, such as roadways, lighted parking lots, commercial and residential exterior lighting, within the Specific Plan area and its vicinity. Because the related projects are similar in character and intensity as existing development and proposed land uses under the Specific Plan, implementation of the proposed Specific Plan in conjunction with the related projects could gradually result in an increase in lighting throughout the Specific Plan area and vicinity. The cumulative development could also incrementally contribute to cumulative daytime glare and reflective impacts. However, the City's regulations (Municipal Code Section 153.140.040) provide light and glare performance standards for development within the City. These regulations state that lighting shall be the minimum necessary in order to achieve the purpose of the light and that all lights shall be directed, oriented and shielded to prevent light from shining onto adjacent properties, onto public rights-of-way, and into driveway areas in a manner that would obstruct motorists' vision. With implementation of this existing municipal code regulation, the development that would occur by the proposed Specific Plan would not combine with the related projects to result in a cumulatively adverse impact related to lighting or glare. Therefore, implementation of the Specific Plan, when combined with the past, present, and reasonably foreseeable cumulative projects would not be cumulatively considerable. Significance Determination: Less than cumulatively considerable Baldwin Park TOD Specific Flan Project 3.1-19 ESA / 130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures ..... ................... . . ..................... . . . ..... . ............ . ..... 3.1 Aesthetics im I City of Baldwin Park, Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan, November 2002. City of Baldwin Park, Manual for Living Streets Design, May 2012. City of Baldwin Park, Municipal Code Section 153.140.040, Light and Glare, accessed at lates.'f'ii=(IelIli tat iii$3.0$vii =ainI q bal w 1pqi:Lc-_ca d --i I, , November 17, 2014. US Federal Highway Administration, Scenic America, http://www.seenic.org/byways, accessed March 27, 2008. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.1-20 ESA 1130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report ApdI 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 3.2 Air Quality Introduction This section addresses the impacts of the proposed Downtown Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Specific Plan on ambient air quality and the exposure of people, especially sensitive individuals, to unhealthful pollutant concentrations. Specifically, this section analyzes pollutant emissions that would be generated by the construction and operation of the proposed Specific Plan. 3.2.1 Environmental Setting Climate and Meteorology Air quality is affected by both the rate and location of pollutant emissions and by meteorological conditions that influence movement and dispersal of pollutants. Atmospheric conditions such as wind speed, wind direction, and air temperature gradients, along with local topography, provide the link between air pollutant emissions and air quality. The Specific Plan area is located within the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB), an approximately 6,745 -square -mile area bounded by the Pacific Ocean to the west and the San Gabriel, San Bernardino, and San Jacinto Mountains to the north and east. The SCAB includes all of Orange County and the non -desert portions of Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino counties, in addition to the San Gorgonio Pass area in Riverside County. The Basin is a coastal plain with connecting broad valleys and low hills, and its terrain and geographical location determine its distinctive climate. The general region lies in the semi-permanent high-pressure zone of the eastern Pacific, resulting in a mild Mediterranean climate tempered by cool sea breezes with light average wind speeds. The usually mild pattern of the climate is interrupted occasionally by periods of extremely hot weather, winter storms, or Santa Ana winds. Factors such as wind, sunlight, temperature, humidity, rainfall, and topography all affect the accumulation and dispersion of pollutants throughout the Basin, making it an area of high pollution potential. This condition is generally attributed to the large amount of pollutant emissions, light winds, and shallow vertical atmospheric mixing. Vertical dispersion of air pollutants in the SCAB is hampered by the presence of persistent temperature inversions. High- pressure systems, such as the semi-permanent high-pressure zone in which the SCAB is located, are characterized by an upper layer of dry air that warms as it descends, restricting mobility in the formation of subsidence inversions. Such inversions restrict the vertical dispersion of air pollutants released into the marine layer and, together with strong sunlight, can produce worst- case conditions for the formation of smog. Most of the annual rainfall in the SCAB occurs from November through April. The dominant daily wind pattern is a daytime sea breeze and a nighttime land breeze, except when winter storms or northeasterly Santa Ana winds flow from the mountains and deserts north of the SCAB to the ocean. The transport of ocean air across the SCAB in an easterly direction over the mountains moves air quality pollutants out of the SCAB. However, when westerly winds are Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.2-1 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures ®„ .,........ _.. 3A Air Quality stagnant or inversions occur, pollutants become trapped within the SCAB, resulting in higher levels of pollutants. Sources of air emissions can be categorized as either stationary or mobile sources. Stationary sources can be divided into two major subcategories: point and area sources. Point sources occur at an identified location and are usually associated with manufacturing and industry. Baldwin Park contains single-family residential neighborhoods that surround a small Downtown, which contains a mix of commercial and nearby industrial development strategically located near the I- 605 and I-10 freeways. The primary source of air pollutants in the vicinity of the Specific Plan area are from mobile sources (e.g., motor vehicles and trucks that traverse the local roadway network and diesel operated freight and Metrolink trains). Additional emission sources stem from residential, commercial, and industrial land uses and include landscaping and lawn care elquipment, water heaters, painting activities, and landfills. Residential land uses also produce emissions from consumer products, such as lighter fluid and hair spray. Additional indirect emissions result from electricity generation to provide electricity to the existing uses. Ambient Air Quality Standards Regulation of air pollution is achieved through both federal and state ambient air quality standards and emission limits for individual sources of air pollutants. As required by the federal Clean Air Act, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) has identified criteria pollutants and has established National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) to protect public health and welfare. NAAQS have been established for ozone (03), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), particulate matter (PM10 and PM2,5), and lead (Pb). These pollutants are called "criteria" air pollutants because standards have been established for each of them to meet specific public health and welfare criteria. To protect human health and the environment, the USEPA has set "primary" and "secondary" maximum ambient limits for each of the criteria pollutants. Primary standards were set to protect human health, particularly sensitive receptors such as children, the elderly, and individuals suffering from chronic lung conditions such as asthma and emphysema. Secondary standards were set to protect the natural environment and prevent damage to animals, crops, vegetation, and buildings. The NAAQS establish the level for an air pollutant above which detrimental effects to public health or welfare may result. The NAAQS are defined as the maximum acceptable concentrations that, depending on the pollutant, may not be equaled or exceeded more than once per year or in some cases as a percentile of observations. California has generally adopted more stringent ambient air quality standards for the criteria air pollutants (i.e., California Ambient Air Quality Standards) and has adopted air quality standards for some pollutants for which there is no corresponding national standard, such as sulfates, hydrogen sulfide, vinyl chloride, and visibility - reducing particles. Both the national and State ambient air quality standards for pollutants along with their associated health effects and sources are presented in Table 3.2-1. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.2-2 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures _ ...... -- .. _.... ......... 3A Air Quality TABLE 3.2-1 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS FOR CRITERIA POLLUTANTS (CO) Averaging State National Pollutant Health and visibility of Pollutant Time Standard Standard Atmospheric Effects Major Pollutant Sources Ozone 1 hour 0.09 ppm --- High concentrations can directly Formed when ROG and NOx react in 0.100 m ppm ...,.,.B Dioxide (SO,) m affect lungs, causing irritation. the presence of sunlight. Major tract to e reddish - tract. Colors atmospher30 hours 0��07 ppm 0.075 ppm Long-term exposure may cause sources include on -road motor (NO2) Arithmetic Mean damage to lung tissue. vehicles, solvent evaporation, and 1 hour 25 ppm 75 pb ppPm..._, Irritates er tract; Plof Dioxide commercial / industrial mobile 0.50 yellow a leaves p�o (SO2) 24 hours equipment. Carbon 1 hour 20 35 ppm Internal engines, primarily combustionClassified Monoxide �- ppm asphyxiant,mlonloxide gasoline -powered motor vehicles. 8 hours 9.0 m 9 P the transfer of with the Respirable (CO) Calendar 1.5 Pg/m3 0.23/km; Standard fresh oxygen to the blood and visibility of Rolling 3 -Month --. ... 0.15 Pg/m3 deprives sensitive tissues of Average _ Hydrogen _ 1 hour 0.03m oxygen. _ Nitrogen 1 hour _ 0 18 m 0.100 m ppm eyes and r Irritating respiratory g Dioxide (SO,) Standard tract to e reddish - tract. Colors atmospher30 Annual 0 0 pp m 0.053 pp brow (NO2) Arithmetic Mean ..,,... Sulfur 1 hour 25 ppm 75 pb ppPm..._, Irritates er tract; Plof Dioxide 3 hours0 0.50 yellow a leaves p�o (SO2) 24 hours 0.04 ppm 0.14 ppm destructive to marble, iron, and steel. Limits visibility and reduces Annual 0.03 ppm sunlight. Arithmetic Mean Respirable 24 hours 50 /m U9/m3 1 50 IJgjm.. May ye and respiratory Particulatern- a Annual 20 Pg . tract, d and in lung capacity,......— c decreases gt. cane increased mortality. Matter Arithmetic Mean Produces haze and limits (PM10) visibility. Fine 24 hours .35 Pg/m' spiratory dise ase, Increases respiratory Particulate Annual 12 Pg/m3 12 Ng/ma lung damage, cancer, and premature death Reduces Matter Arithmetic Mean visibility and results in sur#ace (PM2.5) soiling. Lead (Pb) 30 Day Average 1.5 Pg/m3 Visibility Calendar 1.5 Pg/m3 0.23/km; Standard Quarter visibility of Rolling 3 -Month --. ... 0.15 Pg/m3 more Average _ Hydrogen _ 1 hour 0.03m nal No National Sulfide Standard Sulfates IT� 24 hour 25 Pg/M3o N National (SO,) Standard Visibility 8 hour Extinction of No National Reducing 0.23/km; Standard Particles visibility of 10 miles or more Disturbs gastrointestinal system, and causes anemia, kidney disease, and neuromuscular and neurological dysfunction (in severe cases). Motor vehicles, petroleum refining operations, industrial sources, aircraft, ships, and railroads. Fuel combustion, chemical plants, sulfur recovery plants, and metal processing. Dust and fume -producing industrial and agricultural operations, combustion, atmospheric photochemical reactions, and natural activities (u,.9 , wind -raised dust and ocean sprays). _ Fuel combustion in motor vehicles, equipment, and industrial sources; residential and agricultural burning; Also, formed from photochemical reactions of other pollutants, including NOx, sulfur oxides, and organics. Present source: lead smelters, battery manufacturing and recycling facilities, Past source: combustion of leaded gasoline. Nuisance odor (rotten egg smell), Geothermal power plants, petroleum headache and breathing production and refining difficulties (higher concentrations) ry functions; Industrial processes. e In ventilatory ses aggravation of asthmatic symptoms; aggravation of cardio- pulmonary disease; vegetation damage;; degradation of visibility; property damage. Reduces visibility, reduced airport See PMw -.mm z.s• safety, lower real estate value, and discourages tourism. NOTE: ppm = parts per million; ppb = parts per billion; Pg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter SOURCE: CARE, 2013a. _....... ................... Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.2-3 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures ... — -- ____ ____ -- ---- ._. 3 4 Air Quality Criteria Air Pollutants Ozone Ozone, the main component of photochemical smog, is primarily a summer and fall pollution problem. Ozone is not emitted directly into the air, but is formed through a complex series of chemical reactions involving other compounds that are directly emitted. These directly emitted pollutants (also known as ozone precursors) include reactive organic gases (ROGs) or volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and oxides of nitrogen (NOx). While both ROGs and VOCs refer to compounds of carbon, ROG is a term used by CARB and is identified based on a list of carbon compounds that exempts carbon compounds determined by CARB to be nonreactive. VOC is a term used by the USEPA and is identified based on USEPA's separate list of exempted compounds it identifies as having negligible photochemical reactivity. The time period required for ozone formation allows the reacting compounds to spread over a large area, producing regional pollution problems. Ozone concentrations are the cumulative result of regional development patterns rather than the result of a few significant emission sources. Once ozone is formed it remains in the atmosphere for one or two days. Ozone is then eliminated through reaction with chemicals on the leaves of plants, attachment to water droplets as they fall to earth ("rainout"), or absorption by water molecules in clouds that later fall to earth with rain ("washout"). Short-term exposure to ozone can irritate the eyes and cause constriction of the airways. In addition to causing shortness of breath, ozone can aggravate existing respiratory diseases such as asthma, bronchitis, and emphysema. Carbon Monoxide CO, a colorless and odorless gas, is a relatively non-reactive pollutant that is a product of incomplete combustion and is mostly associated with motor vehicles. When inhaled at high concentrations, CO combines with hemoglobin in the blood and reduces the oxygen -carrying capacity of the blood. This results in reduced oxygen reaching the brain, heart and other body tissues. This condition is especially critical for people with cardiovascular diseases, chronic lung disease, or anemia. CO measurements and modeling were important in the early 1980s when CO levels were regularly exceeded throughout California. In more recent years, CO measurements and modeling have not been a priority in most California air districts due to the retirement of older polluting vehicles, lower emissions from new vehicles, and improvements in fuels. Nitrogen Dioxide NO2 is a reddish -brown gas that is a by-product of combustion processes. Automobiles and industrial operations are the main sources of NO2. Combustion devices emit primarily nitric oxide (NO), which reacts through oxidation in the atmosphere to form NO2. The combined emissions of NO and NO2 are referred to as NOx, which are reported as equivalent NO2. Aside from its contribution to ozone formation, NO2 can increase the risk of acute and chronic respiratory disease and reduce visibility. NO2 may be visible as a coloring component of a brown cloud on high pollution days, especially in conjunction with high ozone levels. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.2-4 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3,Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures .,, 3.'4 Air Quality Sulfur Dioxide SO2 is a colorless, extremely irritating gas or liquid that enters the atmosphere as a pollutant mainly as a result of burning high sulfur -content fuel oils and coal, and from chemical processes occurring at chemical plants and refineries. When SO2 oxidizes in the atmosphere, it forms sulfur trioxide (S03). Collectively, these pollutants are referred to as sulfur oxides (SOx). Major sources of SO2 include power plants, large industrial facilities, diesel vehicles, and oil - burning residential heaters. Emissions of SO2 aggravate lung diseases, especially bronchitis. This compound also constricts the breathing passages, especially in people with asthma and people involved in moderate to heavy exercise. SO2 potentially causes wheezing, shortness of breath, and coughing. Long-term SO2 exposure has been associated with increased risk of mortality from respiratory or cardiovascular disease. Particulate Matter PMIo and PM2,5 consist of particulate matter that is 10 microns or less in diameter and 2.5 microns or less in diameter, respectively (a micron is one -millionth of a meter). PMIo and PM2,5 represent fractions of particulate matter that can be inhaled into the air passages and the lungs and can cause adverse health effects. Acute and chronic health effects associated with high particulate levels include the aggravation of chronic respiratory diseases, heart and lung disease, and coughing, bronchitis and respiratory illnesses in children. Recent mortality studies have shown an association between morbidity and mortality and daily concentrations of particulate matter in the air. Particulate matter can also damage materials and reduce visibility. One common source of PM2.5 is diesel exhaust emissions. PMIo consists of particulate matter emitted directly into the air (e.g., fugitive dust, soot, and smoke from mobile and stationary sources, construction operations, fires, and natural windblown dust) and particulate matter formed in the atmosphere by condensation and/or transformation of SO2 and ROG. Traffic generates particulate matter that settle onto roadways and parking lots. PMIo and PM2,5 are also emitted by burning wood in residential wood stoves and fireplaces and open agricultural burning. PM2,5 can also be formed through secondary processes such as airborne reactions with certain pollutant precursors, including ROGs, ammonia (NH3), NOx, and SOx. Lead Lead is a metal found naturally in the environment and present in some manufactured products. There are a variety of activities that can contribute to lead emissions, which are grouped into two general categories, stationary and mobile sources. On -road mobile sources include light-duty automobiles; light-, medium-, and heavy-duty trucks; and motorcycles. Emissions of lead have dropped substantially over the past 40 years. The reduction before 1990 is largely due to the phase-out of lead as an anti -knock agent in gasoline for on -road automobiles. Substantial emission reductions have also been achieved due to enhanced controls in the metals processing industry. In the SCAB, atmospheric lead is generated almost entirely by the combustion of leaded gasoline and contributes less than one percent of the material collected as total suspended particulates. As lead has been well below regulatory thresholds for decades and the Proposed Project is not a source of lead, lead is not discussed further in this analysis. _..... Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.2-5 ESA / D130953 April 2015 Draft Environmental Impact Report 3, Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures ®,,,,, ........ 3.4 Air Quality Toxic Air Contaminants Concentrations of toxic air contaminants (TACs), also known as hazardous air pollutants (HAPs), are also used as indicators of ambient air quality conditions. A TAC is defined as an air pollutant that may cause or contribute to an increase in mortality or in serious illness, or that may pose a hazard to human health. TACs are usually present in minute quantities in the ambient air; however, their high toxicity or health risk may pose a threat to public health even at low concentrations. According to The California Almanac of Emissions and Air Quality (GARB, 2009), the majority of the estimated health risk from TACs can be attributed to relatively few compounds, the most important being particulate matter from diesel -fueled engines (diesel PM). Diesel PM differs from other TACs in that it is not a single substance, but rather a complex mixture of hundreds of substances. Although diesel PM is emitted by diesel -fueled internal combustion engines, the composition of the emissions varies depending on engine type, operating conditions, fuel composition, lubricating oil, and whether an emission control system is present. Unlike the other TACs, no ambient monitoring data are available for diesel PM because no routine measurement method currently exists. However, CARB has made preliminary concentration estimates based on a particulate matter exposure method. This method uses the CARB emissions inventory's PMIo database, ambient PMIo monitoring data, and the results from several studies to estimate concentrations of diesel PM. In addition to diesel PM, the TACs for which data are available that pose the greatest existing ambient risk in California are benzene, 1,3 -butadiene, acetaldehyde, carbon tetrachloride, hexavalent chromium, para -dichlorobenzene, formaldehyde, methylene chloride, and perchloroethylen. Odorous Emissions Odors are generally regarded as an annoyance rather than a health hazard. However, manifestations of a person's reaction to foul odors can range from psychological (e.g., irritation, anger, or anxiety) to physiological (e.g., circulatory and respiratory effects, nausea, vomiting, and headache). Offensive odors are unpleasant and can lead to public distress generating citizen complaints to local governments. Although unpleasant, offensive odors rarely cause physical harm. The occurrence and severity of odor impacts depend on the nature, frequency, and intensity of the source, wind speed, direction, and the sensitivity of receptors. Specific Plan Area Air Quality SCAQMD maintains a network of air quality monitoring stations located throughout the SCAB and has divided the SCAB into air quality monitoring areas. The Specific Plan area is located in Source Receptor Area (SRA) #9 East San Gabriel Valley with the closest air monitoring station being the East San Gabriel Valley 1 - the Azusa Station, located at 803 N. Loren Avenue in Azusa (approximately 3.5 miles northeast of the Specific Plan area). This station monitors ozone, CO, NO2, PMIo and PM2„5. The most recent data available from this monitoring station is provided in Table 3.2-2 and encompasses the years 2009 through 2013. In addition, Table 3.2-2 also compares the pollutants to the state and national air quality standards. A summary of the Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.2-6 ESA I D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 3,4 Air Quality and associated health effect of each regulated pollutant is summarized physical properties following Table 3.2-1, TABLE 3.2-2 AIR QUALITY DATA SUMMARY (2009-2013) FOR THE PROJECT SITE AND ITS VICINITY m. ..... ...................... .,,. Monitoring Data by Year .,.__.... .a... Standard Pollutant a -......�,,__.................__ � 009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Oa Highest 1 Hour Average (ppm)b 0.150 0.104 0.111 0.134 0.115 Days over State Standard 0.09 23 5 13 18 7 Days over National Standard 0.12 4 0 0 1 0 Highest 8 Hour Average (ppm)b 0.107 0.081 0.092 0.079 0.085 Days over State Standard 0.07 32 10 0 18 15 Days over National Standard 0.075 17 3 19 10 _ 6 CO Highest 1 Hour Average (ppm)b 1.7 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.7 Days over State Standard 20 0 0 0 0 0 Days over National Standard 35 0 0 0 N0z Highest 1 Hour Average (ppm)b 0.10 0.077 0.0795 0.0718 0.0769 Days over State Standard 0 0 0 0 0 Annual Average 0 0194..... 0.0185 0.0190 0.0195 ... 0.0177 ......... ......- PMto 3 b d Highest 24 Hour Average - State/National (µg/m ) 74 70 65 78 76 Estimated days over State Standard° 50 7 5 9 6 6 Estimated days over National Standards 150 0 0 0 0 0 State Annual Averaged 20 32 29.8 32.7 30.3 33.0 National Annual Averaged - PMz.s 3 b 72.1 44.4 49.5 39.6 29.6 Highest 24 Hour Average - National (µg/m ) Estimated days over National Standard ° 65/35, 6 1 1 1 0 State Annual Average d 12 12.8 10.9 11.4 11.0 10.54 National Annual Avera a 5 a Generally, state standards are not to be exceeded and federal standards are not to be exceeded more than once per year. b ppm = parts per million; µg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter. c PM -10 and PM -2.5 are not measured every day of the year. "Number of samples" refers to the number of days in a given year during which PM -10 and PM -2.5 were measured at the Azusa station. d State statistics are based on California approved samplers, whereas national statistics are based on samplers using federal reference or equiv,g1ent methods, e USEPA lowered Hie 24 hour PM -2.5 standard from 65 pg'af"'to 35 11g/m3. Though the current standard is 35µg/m3, the estimated days over the natWnal standard refers to days above the, 65 jrg/rn'`s�tandard. NA = Not Available. SOURCE: SCAQMD, 2009 - 2013. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.2-7 ESA I D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures „. ,. 3.4 Air Quality Both CARB and USEPA use this type of monitoring data to designate areas according to their attainment status for criteria air pollutants. The purpose of these designations is to identify the areas with air quality problems and thereby initiate planning efforts for improvement. The three basic designation categories are nonattainment, attainment, and unclassified. Unclassified is used in an area that cannot be classified on the basis of available information as meeting or not meeting the standards. In addition, the California designations include a subcategory of nonattainment-transitional, which is given to nonattainment areas that are progressing and nearing attainment. The current attainment status for the SCAB is provided in Table 3.2-3. TABLE 3.2-3 SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN ATTAINMENT STATUS Pollutant California Standards Federal Standards Ozone Extreme Nonattainment Severe Nonattainment CO Attainment Unclassified/ Attainment NO2 Attainment Unclassified/ Attainment SO2 Attainment Attainment PMto Nonattainment Attainment PM2,5 Nonattainment Nonattainment Lead Attainment Nonattainment SOURCE: CARB, 2013b; USEPA, 2013. Existing Health Risk in the Surrounding Area Both SCAQMD and CARB have monitoring networks in the SCAB that measure ambient concentrations of certain toxic air contaminants (TACs) that are associated with important health- related effects and are present in appreciable concentrations in the area. SCAQMD uses this information to determine risks for a particular area. Stationary source TACs tend to be approximately the same level year-round. However, TACs from mobile sources tend to be higher during the fall and winter months (SCAQMD, 2000a). According to the SCAQMD's MATES II study (SCAQMD, 2000a), the Specific Plan area is within 4 cancer risk zones where risk ranges from 871 in one million to 961 in one million, which is largely due to diesel particulate emissions. Sensitive Receptors Some people are especially sensitive to air pollution emissions and should be given special consideration when evaluating air quality impacts from projects. The SCAQMD defines typical sensitive receptors as residences, schools, playgrounds, childcare centers, athletic facilities, long- term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, and retirement homes (SCAQMD, 1993). The reasons for heightened sensitivity may also include health problems, proximity to the emissions source, and duration of exposure to air pollutants. Land uses such as schools, hospitals, and convalescent homes are considered to be relatively sensitive to poor air quality because the very young, the old, and the infirm are more susceptible to respiratory infections and other air quality -related health problems than the general public. Residential areas Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.2-8 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures _ .. ®__ ....... _,., 3,4 Air Quality are considered sensitive to poor air quality because people are often at home for extended periods. The nearest sensitive receptors include single-family and multi -family residences near and within the proposed Specific Plan area, as well as the schools, parks, and associated playgrounds located within the Specific Plan area. EME Air pollutants are regulated at the national, state, and air basin level; each agency has a different degree of control. USEPA regulates at the national level and CARB regulates at the state level. SCAQMD regulates at the air basin level. Federal Clean AirAct The federal Clean Air Act is a comprehensive federal law that regulates air emissions from area, stationary, and mobile sources. This law authorizes USEPA to establish NAAQS to protect public health and the environment. The federal Clean Air Act was passed in 1963, and has since undergone five major amendment cycles. The latest major amendment of the federal Clean Air Act was completed in 1990, with prior major amendments having occurred in 1965, 1967, 1970, and 1977. USEPA utilizes the established NAAQS for six "criteria pollutants" as indicators of air quality, and has established a threshold maximum concentration level for which an adverse effect on human health may occur. Federal standards for these criteria pollutants are shown in Table 3.2-2. Ambient air quality standards are intended to protect the public health and welfare, and they incorporate an adequate margin of safety. The NAAQS were set to protect public health, including that of sensitive individuals; thus, the standards continue to change as more medical research is available regarding the health effects of the criteria pollutants. California Clean Air Act In 1988, the state legislature passed the California Clean Air Act, which established California's air quality goals, planning mechanisms, regulatory strategies, and standards of progress for the first time. The California Clean Air Act provides the state with a comprehensive framework for air quality planning regulation and sets state air quality standards. The California Ambient Air Quality Standards, also shown in Table 3.2-2, incorporate additional standards for most of the criteria pollutants and has set standards for other pollutants recognized by the state such as sulfates, hydrogen sulfide, vinyl chloride, and visibility -reducing particles. In general, the state standards are more health protective than the federal standards. State Implementation Plan The 1977 Clean Air Act Amendments require that regional planning and air pollution control agencies prepare a regional Air Quality Plan to outline the measures by which both stationary and mobile sources of pollutants can be controlled in order to achieve all standards specified in the Clean Air Act. For areas that are designated "nonattainment" with respect to a standard, the Clean Air Act specifies future dates for achieving compliance with the NAAQS and mandates that states Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.2-9 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 3 4 Air Quality submit and implement a State Implementation Plan (SIP) for local areas not meeting these standards. These plans must include pollution control measures that demonstrate how the standards will be met. Similarly, the 1988 California Clean Air Act also requires development of air quality plans and strategies to meet state air quality standards in areas designated as nonattainment (with the exception of areas designated as nonattainment for the state PM standards). Maintenance plans are required for attainment areas that had previously been designated nonattainment in order to ensure continued attainment of the standards. Toxic Air Contaminants TACs have been regulated under federal air quality law since the 1977 federal Clean Air Act Amendments. The most recent federal Clean Air Act Amendments (1990) reflect a technology- based approach for reducing TACs. The first phase involves requiring facilities to install Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT). The MACT standards vary depending on the type of emitting source. USEPA has established MACT standards for over 20 facilities or activities, such as perchloroethylene dry cleaning and petroleum refineries. The second phase of control involves determining the residual health risk represented by air toxics emissions sources after implementation of MACT standards. Two principal laws provide the foundation for state regulation of TACs from stationary sources. In 1983, the State Legislature adopted Assembly Bill 1807, which established a process for identifying TACs and provided the authority for developing retrofit air toxics control measures on a statewide basis. Air toxics from stationary sources in California are also regulated under Assembly Bill 2588, the Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Information and Assessment Act of 1987. Regulation of TACs from mobile sources has traditionally been implemented through emissions standards for on -road motor vehicles (imposed on vehicle manufacturers) and through specifications for gasoline and diesel fuel sold in California (imposed on fuel refineries and retailers), rather than through land use decisions, air quality permits, or regulations addressing how motor vehicles are used by the general public. In August 1998, CARB identified particulate emissions from diesel -fueled engines (diesel particulate matter, or DPM) as TACs. CARB developed the Risk Reduction Plan to Reduce Particulate Matter Emissions from Diesel -Fueled Engines and Vehicles (CARB, 2000). This document provides a plan to reduce diesel particulate emissions, with the goal of reducing emissions and the associated health risks by 75 percent in 2010 and by 85 percent in 2020. The program aims to require the use of state-of-the-art catalyzed diesel particulate filters and ultra low sulfur diesel fuel on diesel -fueled engines. Regional Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide SCAG is the regional planning agency for Los Angeles, Orange, Ventura, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Imperial counties, and its work addresses regional issues relating to transportation, the economy, community development, and the environment. SCAG is the federally -designated MPO for the majority of the southern California region and is the largest MPO in the nation. As the designated MPO, SCAG is mandated by the federal government to develop and implement regional plans that address transportation, growth management, Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.2-10 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures .-. — 34Air4...... .. Quality hazardous waste management, and air quality issues. With respect to air quality planning, SCAG has prepared the Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide for the Los Angeles County region, which includes Growth Management and Regional Mobility chapters that form the basis for the land use and transportation components of the AQMP and are utilized in the preparation of air quality forecasts and the consistency analysis that is included in the AQMP. South Coast Air Quality Management District Criteria Air Pollutants SCAQMD attains and maintains air quality conditions in the SCAB through a comprehensive program of planning, regulation, enforcement, technical innovation, and promotion of the understanding of air quality issues. The clean air strategy of SCAQMD includes preparation of plans for attainment of ambient air quality standards, adoption and enforcement of rules and regulations concerning sources of air pollution, and issuance of permits for stationary sources of air pollution. SCAQMD also inspects stationary sources of air pollution and responds to citizen complaints; monitors ambient air quality and meteorological conditions; and implements programs and regulations required by the Clean Air Act. Air Quality Management Plan SCAQMD and the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) are responsible for preparing the air quality management plan (AQMP), which addresses federal and state CAA requirements. The AQMP details goals, policies,, and programs for improving air quality in the SCAB. The 2012 AQMP was adopted by the SCAQMD Governing Board on December 12, 2012. The purpose of the 2012 AQMP for the SCAB is to set forth a comprehensive and integrated program that will lead the region into compliance with the federal 24-hour PM2.5 air quality standard, and to provide an update to the SCAB's commitment towards meeting the federal 8 -hour ozone standards (SCAQMD, 2013). The AQMP would also serve to satisfy recent USEPA requirements for a new attainment demonstration of the revoked 1 -hour ozone standard, as well as a vehicle miles travelled (VMT) emissions offset demonstration.1 Specifically, the AQMP would serve as the official SIP submittal for the federal 2006 24-hour PM2,5 standard, for which USEPA has established a due date of December 14, 2012.2 In addition, the AQMP updates specific new control measures and commitments for emissions reductions to implement the attainment strategy for the 8 -hour ozone SIP. The 2012 AQMP sets forth programs which require integrated planning efforts and the cooperation of all levels of government: local, regional, state, and federal. Currently, SCAQMD staff has already begun initiating an early development process for the 2015 AQMP. Although the federal 1 -hour ozone standard was revoked in 2005, the USEPA has proposed to require anew 1 -hour ozone attainment demonstration in the South Coast extreme ozone nonattainment area as a result of a recent court decision. Although USEPA has replaced the 1 -hour ozone standard with a more health protective 8 -hour standard, the Clean Air Act anti -backsliding provisions require that California have approved plans for attaining the 1 -hour standard. Although the 2012 AQMP was approved by the SCAQN41) Board on Deccunber '7„ 2012,, the plan dial not gel submitted to the USHPA by December 14, 2012 as it Fit I required approval from CARB, The 2012 AQW." wris subsequently approved by CARB on January 25, 2013, and as a.af l uliraaary 13, 2013 the plan has beensubmitted. by CARE to the USEPA. Baldwin Park TDD Specific Plan Project 3.2-11 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 3 4 Air Quality SCAQMD Rules and Regulations All projects are subject to SCAQMD rules and regulations in effect at the time of construction. Specific rules applicable to the construction anticipated under the proposed Project would include the following: Rule 401— Visible Emissions. A person shall not discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emission whatsoever any air contaminant for a period or periods aggregating more than three minutes in any 1 hour that is as dark or darker in shade as that designated No. 1 on the Ringelmann Chart, as published by the U.S. Bureau of Mines. Rule 402 — Nuisance. A person shall not discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material that cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or that endanger the comfort, repose, health, or safety of any such persons or the public, or that cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property. The provisions of this rule do not apply to odors emanating from agricultural operations necessary for the growing of crops or the raising of fowl or animals. Rule 403 — Fugitive Dust. This rule is intended to reduce the amount of particulate matter entrained in the ambient air as a result of anthropogenic (human -made) fugitive dust sources by requiring actions to prevent, reduce, or mitigate fugitive dust emissions. Rule 403 applies to any activity or human -made condition capable of generating fugitive dust. Rule 1113 — Architectural Coatings. No person shall apply or solicit the application of any architectural coating within the SCAQMD with VOC content in excess of the values specified in a table incorporated in the Rule. Rule 1403 — Asbestos Emissions from Demolition/Renovation Activities. This rule specifies work practice requirements to limit asbestos emissions from building demolition and renovation activities, including the removal and associated disturbance of asbestos containing materials. The requirements for demolition and renovation activities include asbestos surveying, notification, asbestos containing materials removal procedures and time schedules, asbestos containing materials handling and clean-up procedures, and storage, disposal, and land filling requirements for asbestos containing waste materials. All operators are required to maintain records, including waste shipment records, and are required to use appropriate warning labels, signs, and markings. Toxic Air Contaminants At the local level, air pollution control or management districts may adopt and enforce CARB control measures. Under SCAQMD Regulation XIV (Toxics and Other Non -Criteria Pollutants), and in particular Rule 1401 (New Source Review), all sources that possess the potential to emit TACs are required to obtain permits from SCAQMD. Permits may be granted to these operations if they are constructed and operated in accordance with applicable regulations, including new source review standards and air toxics control measures. SCAQMD limits emissions and public exposure to TACs through a number of programs. SCAQMD prioritizes TAC -emitting stationary sources based on the quantity and toxicity of the TAC emissions and the proximity of the facilities to sensitive receptors. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.2-12 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Imparts, and Mitigation Measures ......... 3 4 Air Quality The Air Toxics Control Plan (March 2000b, revised March 26, 2004) is a planning document designed to examine the overall direction of SCAQMD's air toxics control program. It includes development and implementation of strategic initiatives to monitor and control air toxics emissions. Control strategies that are deemed viable and are within SCAQMD's jurisdiction will each be brought to the SCAQMD Board for further consideration through the normal public review process. Strategies that are to be implemented by other agencies will be developed in a cooperative effort, and the progress will be reported back to the Board periodically. Local City of Baldwin Park General Plan: Air Quality Element Baldwin Park's General Plan Air Quality Element is intended to protect public health and welfare by implementing measures that allow SCAB to attain federal and state air quality standards. To achieve this goal, the Element sets forth a number of programs to reduce current pollution emissions and to require new development to include measures to comply with air quality standards. GOAL 1.0 Improve air quality by reducing the amount of air pollution through proper land use planning. Policy 1.2: Locale multiple fairrrily tievelopmeilt:s close to commercial areas to encourage pedestrian readier thein Veil dCiI 1a11'travel. Policy 1.3: Encourage the development of higher density housing in close proximity to the City's Metrolink station. Policy 1.4: Provide for the enli.ai°iceinent of neighborliood commercial centers to provide services wdllihi walkhig distance of residentia.l. rteigliborhoods. Policy 1.5: Encourage the design of new residential and commercial areas to foster pedestrian circulation. GOAL 2.0 Improve air quality by reducing the amount of vehicular emissions through planning for alternative forms of travel. Policy 2.2: Cooperate and participate in regional air quality management planning, programs, and enforcement measures. GOAL 3.0 Improve air quality by reducing the amount of vehicular emissions through transportation planning that encourages trip reduction. Policy 3.1: Utifve incentives, regrrlartions and/or 1 ransportal:ion Demand Miinagcinel,a. (TDM) progra is lir cooperation witlr other jurisdictions iii the South Coast Ail- Basin to eliminate vehicle trips which would otherwise be made. Policy 3.2: Utilize Anceoti'ves, regulItions, aiidio lratisportationDeiria,iud Maiti�igeiiielit in cooperation with otherji.irisdict.ions to redrice the vehicle miles traveled for auto trips which still need to be made. GOAL 4.0 IIli prove Kris (it ialdty by redricijig vehicular° eiiiissions through transportation planning dlnl,rove rircilt.s tliait iinprove the flow of traffic. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.2-13 ESA! D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures --- -......_ �- 3.4 Air Quality Policy 4.5: Implement citywide traffic flow improvement outlined in the Circulation Element. Policy 4.6: Adopt and implement the required components of the Congestion Management Plan, and continue to work with Los Angeles County on annual updates to the CMP. GOAL 5.0 Reduce particulate emissions to the greatest extent feasible. Policy 5.1 Adopt incentives, regulations, and/or procedures to minimize particulate emissions from paved roads. Policy 5.2 Adopt incentives, regulations, and/or procedures to minimize particulate emissions from unpaved roads, parking lots, and staging areas. 3.2.3 Thresholds of Significance In accordance with Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, the project could have a significant impact on air quality if it would: • Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan; • Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation; • Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors); • Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations; or • Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people; It was determined in the Initial Study (Appendix A) that the proposed Specific Plan would not result in objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. The Specific Plan proposes mixed use commercial and residential development within the project area, which do not involve the types of uses that would emit objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. In addition, odors generated by new and existing non-residential land uses in the Specific Plan area are required to be in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402 to prevent odor nuisances on sensitive land uses. SCAQMD Rule 402, Nuisance, states: A person shall not discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property. During construction of future projects allowed under the proposed Specific Plan, emissions from construction equipment, such as diesel exhaust, and volatile organic compounds from architectural coatings and paving activities may generate odors. However, these odors would be limited and temporary; and thus, are not expected to affect a substantial number of people. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.2-14 ESA ! D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures ........................ 3.4 Air Quality Therefore, impacts relating to both operational and construction activity odors would be less than significant, and odors will not be further evaluated. The significance thresholds in SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook are used in evaluating project impacts. SCAQMD has established daily mass thresholds for regional pollutant emissions, which are shown in Table 3.2-4. TABLE 3.2-4 SCAQMD SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS Air Contaminant Construction (pounds per day) Operations (pounds per day) CO 550 550 NO% 100 55 SO, 150 150 VOC (or ROG) 75 55 PM,o 150 150 55 55 SOURCE: SCAQMD, 1993. Projects in the SCAB are also required to analyze local air quality impacts. As discussed previously, SCAQMD has developed LSTs that represent the maximum emissions from a project that are not expected to cause or contribute to an exceedance of the most stringent applicable federal or state ambient air quality standards, and thus would not cause or contribute to localized air quality impacts. LSTs are developed based on the ambient concentrations of that pollutant for each of the 38 source receptor areas (SRAs) in the SCAB. The localized thresholds, which are found in the mass rate look -up tables in SCAQMD's Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology document, were developed for use on projects that are less than or equal to five acres in size and are only applicable to the following criteria pollutants: NOx, CO, PMIo, and PM2 5. The construction and operational LSTs for a one -acre, two -acre, and 5 -acre sites in SRA 8 (West San Gabriel Valley), which is where the Specific Plan is located, are shown in Table 3.2-5.. TABLE 3.2-5 SCAQMD LOCALIZED SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS Allowable emissions (pounds/day) as a function of receptor distance (feet) from site boundary Pollutant Monitored Within SRA 8 — West San Gabriel Valley Area 82 (ft) 164 (ft) 328 (ft) 656 (ft) 1,640 (ft) One -Acre Site Construction Thresholds Nitrogen Oxides (NO.)o 89 112 159 251 489 Carbon Monoxide (CO) 623 945 1,914 4,803 20,721 Respirable Particulate Matter (PM,o) 5 14 34 75 199 Fine Particulate Matter (PM25) 3 5 9 22 94 -,....,,.,., 53 Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.2-15 ESA I D1309 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures .... __ .,...... . 3.4 Air Quality Operational Thresholds Nitrogen Oxides (NO,)' 89 112 159 251 489 Carbon Monoxide (CO) 623 945 1,914 4,803 20,721 Respirable Particulate Matter (PM1o) 2 4 9 19 48 Fine Particulate Matter (PM25) 1 2 3 6 23 Two-Acre Site Construction Thresholds Nitrogen Oxides (NO,)a 128 151 200 284 513 Carbon Monoxide (CO) 953 1,344 2,445 5,658 22,093 Respirable Particulate Matter (PM10) 7 22 42 84 207 Fine Particulate Matter (PM25) 5 7 12 26 100 Operational Thresholds Nitrogen Oxides (NO,)a 128 151 200 284 513 Carbon Monoxide (CO) 953 1,344 2,445 5,658 22„093 Respirable Particulate Matter (PM1o) 2 6 11 20 50 Fine Particulate Matter (PM25) 2 2 3 7 25 Five -Acre Site Construction Thresholds Nitrogen Oxides (NO,)a 203 227 286 368 584 Carbon Monoxide (CO) 1,773 2,299 3,680 7,600 25,558 Respirable Particulate Matter (PM10) 14 43 63 105 229 Fine Particulate Matter (PM25) 8 11 17 35 116 Operational Thresholds Nitrogen Oxides (NO.)' 203 227 286 368 584 Carbon Monoxide (CO) 1,773 2,299 3,680 7,600 25,558 Respirable Particulate Matter (PM10) 4 11 16 26 55 Fine Particulate Matter (PM2,5) 2 3 5 9 28 a The localized thresholds listed for NOx in this table take into consideration the gradual conversion of NO to NO2.The analysis of localized air quality impacts associated with NOx emissions focuses on NO2 levels as they are associated with adverse health effects. SOURCE: SCAQMD, 2003 (Revised 2009). It should be noted that with regards to NOx emissions, the two principal species of NOx are NO and NO2, with the vast majority (95 percent) of the NOx emissions being comprised of NO. However, because adverse health effects are associated with NO2, not NO, the analysis of localized air quality impacts associated with NOx emissions is focused on NO2 levels. For combustion sources, SCAQMD assumes that the conversion of NO to NO2 is complete at a distance of 5,000 meters from the source. CO Hotspot Analysis Historically, qualitative screening procedure provided in the procedures and guidelines contained in Transportation Project -Level Carbon Monoxide Protocol (the Protocol) were used to determine whether a project poses the potential for a CO hotspot (UCD ITS, 1997). According to the Protocol, projects may worsen air quality if they increase the percentage of vehicles in cold start Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.2-16 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures -- 3.4 Air Quality modes by two percent or more; significantly increase traffic volumes (by five percent or more) over existing volumes; or worsen traffic flow, defined for signalized intersections as increasing average delay at intersections operating at level of service (LOS) E or F or causing an intersection that would operate at LOS D or better without the project, to operate at LOS E or F. However, it should be noted that CO concentrations have declined dramatically in California due to existing controls and programs and most areas of the state, including the region in which the Specific Plan is located, have no problem meeting the state and federal CO standards. Additionally, CO hotspots have not been seen in the most congested intersections in the region in well over a decade. CO measurements and modeling were important in the early 1980s when CO levels were regularly exceeded throughout California. In more recent years, CO measurements and modeling have not been a priority in most California air districts due to the retirement of older polluting vehicles, fewer emissions from new vehicles and improvements in fuels (CARB, 2004). The reduction in older polluting vehicles and emissions controls on newer vehicles have increased the number of vehicles that can idle and the length of time that a number of vehicles can idle before emissions would trigger a CO impact. This increase in vehicle idling has made the use of the LOS as an indicator obsolete for determining CO impacts. For this reason, several air districts, including the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) (BAAQMD, 2009), have adopted guidelines that focus on criteria other than LOS and percentage traffic increase, and instead focus on total volumes and consistency with construction management plans. SCAQMD has not created screening criteria. Because CEQA allows the Lead Agency to identify thresholds and SCAQMD does not have screening criteria, BAAQMD screening criteria was used to determine if modeling is required. The BAAQMD criteria are as follows: 1. Consistency with an applicable congestion management program established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways, regional transportation plan, and local congestion management agency plans. 2. Traffic volumes at affected intersections would not be increased to more than 44,000 vehicles per hour. 3. Traffic volumes at affected intersections would not be increased to more than 24,000 vehicles per hour where vertical and/or horizontal mixing is substantially limited (e.g., tunnels, parking garages, bridge underpass, natural or urban street canyon, below -grade roadway). For the purposes of this analysis, intersections that exceed the BAAQMD screening criteria should conduct dispersion modeling to determine the potential impact from the impacted intersections. Where the screening values are not exceeded, the project would be determined to be less than significant with respect to localized CO impacts. Toxic Air Contaminant Analysis Currently, the SCAQMD has only developed significance thresholds that apply to single stationary and mobile sources of TAC emissions, such as projects involving truck stops or warehouses (SCAQMD 2003). However, in absence of a threshold specific to assessing health impacts from a freeway, the SCAQMD's stationary source TAC thresholds of 10 in one million Bal....... ..... dwin PadcTOD Specific Plan Project 3.2-17 ESA! D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures a,_,,.., ......... 3.4 Air Quality for cancer risk and 1 for hazard index would serve as the most appropriate thresholds for use in a TAC analysis. Thus, for the purpose of this TAC analysis, the aforementioned SCAQMD significance criteria would be used as a benchmark to assess when project design features to reduce exposure to new sensitive receptors from existing mobile or stationary sources would need to be implemented. If this benchmark is exceeded, SCAQMD suggests that the proposed Project should reduce health risks associated with exposure to TAC emissions to the greatest extent possible. These criteria are not applied as impact significance thresholds under CEQA. New sources of emissions should be compared to the SCAQMD's stationary source thresholds of 10 in on million. 3.2.4 Methodology This analysis focuses on the nature and magnitude of the change in the air quality environment due to implementation of the proposed Specific Plan. Air pollutant emissions associated with the proposed Specific Plan would result from operations of the future residential, commercial, and mixed use development within the Specific Plan area and from traffic volumes generated by these new uses. Construction activities would also generate air pollutant emissions on individual project sites within the Specific Plan area and on roadways resulting from construction -related traffic. The net increase in emissions generated by these activities and other secondary sources have been estimated and compared to the applicable thresholds of significance recommended by SCAQMD. AQMP Impacts The proposed Specific Plan area is under the jurisdiction of the SCAQMD and the SCAQMD 2012 AQMP is the applicable air quality plan for the region. Projects that are consistent with the regional population, housing, and employment forecasts identified by SCAG are considered to be consistent with the AQMP growth projections, since the forecast assumptions by SCAG forms the basis of the land use and transportation control portions of the AQMP. Additionally, because SCAG's regional growth forecasts are based upon, among other things, land uses designated in general plans, a project that is consistent with the land use designated in a general plan would also be consistent with the SCAG's regional forecast projections, and thus also with the AQMP growth projections. SCAQMD's CEQA Handbook suggests an evaluation of the following two criteria to determine whether a project involving a legislative land use action (such as the proposed Specific Plan) would be consistent or in conflict with the AQMP: 1) The project would not generate population and employment growth that would be inconsistent with SCAG's growth forecasts. 2) The project would not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause or contribute to new violations, or delay the timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emissions reductions specified in the AQMP. --.... ..... . - .._............ Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.2-18 ESA / Di 30953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 3A Air Quality Consistency Criterion No. 1 refers to the SCAG's growth forecasts and associated assumptions included in the 2012 AQMP. The future air quality levels projected in the 2012 AQMP are based on SCAG's growth projections, which are based, in part, on the general plans of cities located within the SCAG region. Therefore, projects, uses, and growth that is consistent with the applicable assumptions used in the development of the AQMP would not jeopardize attainment of the air quality levels identified in the AQMP, even if they exceed the SCAQMD's recommended daily emissions thresholds. Consistency Criterion No. 2 refers to the California Ambient Air Quality Standards. The SCAQMD has identified CO as the best indicator pollutant for determining whether air quality violations would occur since it is most directly related to automobile traffic, the emissions of which have been modeled by the SCAQMD to determine future air quality conditions. Construction Impacts Short-term construction -generated emissions of criteria air pollutants and ozone precursors associated with the proposed Specific Plan were modeled using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod), Version 2013.2.2, as recommended by SCAQMD. CalEEMod was used to determine whether short-term construction -related emissions of criteria air pollutants associated with the proposed Specific Plan would exceed SCAQMD's applicable regional thresholds and whether mitigation would be required. Modeling was based on Plan -specific data, where available. Where Plan -specific information was not available, reasonable assumptions based on other similar Specific Plan projects and default model settings were used to estimate criteria air pollutant and ozone precursor emissions. The timing of construction under the proposed Specific Plan would be dependent on market conditions. It was conservatively assumed that 10 percent of the Specific Plan could be built in any given year (the project build out is over 20 years). It was also assumed that there could be multiple projects occurring at any given time during any given year and therefore construction phases may overlap. Modeling input and output files are provided in Appendix B of this EIR. In addition, to determine whether or not construction activities associated with the proposed Specific Plan would create significant adverse localized air quality impacts on nearby sensitive receptors, the worst-case daily emissions contribution from the potential development were compared to SCAQMD's localized significance thresholds (LSTs). The LSTs developed by SCAQMD are based on the pounds of emissions per day that can be generated by a project without causing or contributing to adverse localized air quality impacts, and only applies to the following criteria pollutants: CO, NOx, PMto, and PM2,5. The analysis of localized air quality impacts focuses only on the on-site activities of a project, and does not include emissions that are generated offsite such as from on -road haul or delivery truck trips (SCAQMD, 2003). For the purpose of analyzing localized air quality impacts, SCAQMD has developed LSTs for three distinct project site sizes: one -acre, two -acre, and five -acres. The LSTs established for each of the aforementioned site acreages represent the amount of pollutant emissions that would not exceed the most stringent applicable federal or State ambient air quality standards. As the acreage of individual project sites are unknown, the LSTs for a one -acre site are used to determine Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.2-19 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 3A Air Quality whether localized air quality impacts on nearby sensitive receptors would result from the project's on-site construction emissions. In conducting the localized air quality analysis, which focuses only on on-site emissions, construction emissions generated from combustion sources (e.g., off-road construction equipment) under a worst-case construction scenario were extracted from the CalEEMod model run outputs. Additionally, to account for the combustion emissions associated with vehicles traveling on-site within active construction sites, vehicles are anticipated to travel approximately 0.2 miles while onsite. Overall, the daily total onsite combustion, mobile, and fugitive dust emissions associated with construction (as well as construction phase overlaps) were combined and evaluated against SCAQMD's LSTs for a one -acre site. Operational Impacts Long-term (i.e., operational) regional emissions of criteria air pollutants and precursors associated with the proposed Specific Plan, including mobile- and area -source emissions, were also quantified using the CaIEEMod computer model. Area -source emissions, which are widely distributed and made of many small emissions sources (e.g., building heating and cooling units, landscaping equipment, consumer products, painting operations, etc.), were modeled according to the size and type of land use proposed. Mass mobile -source emissions were modeled based on the daily vehicle trips that would result from the proposed Specific Plan. Project trip generation rates were available from the Traffic Study prepared for the Project by The Mobility Group (Mobility Group, 2015). In addition, as the Specific Plan area is currently occupied by various residential, commercial, and industrial land uses, some of which would remain, some of which would be removed and reconstructed as the same land use, and others that would be removed and constructed as a new or expanded land use by the proposed Specific Plan. To determine net emissions increases, changes in land uses that would occur by the proposed Specific Plan were identified. The emissions from existing land uses that would be reduced or removed (either by number of units, square footage or by change in land use) were subtracted from the emissions from the anticipated growth (increase in existing land use types or change in land use). Because new and renovated structures that are developed by implementation of the Specific Plan would have a decreased emissions envelope because new regulatory requirements that was not in place when buildings were originally constructed, would be implemented. The net increase in long-term operational emissions that would be generated by build out of the proposed Specific Plan was then compared with the applicable SCAQMD thresholds for determination of significance. Aside from regional air quality impacts, localized air quality impacts during operation of the proposed Specific Plan is also analyzed by extracting the onsite operational emissions from the CaIEEMod model run for build out of the Specific Plan and evaluating those emissions against SCAQMD's applicable operational LSTs. As with construction LST analysis, only onsite - emissions are used in determining a project's potential to impact local air quality for NOX, CO, PM10, and PM2,5. To account for onsite mobile emissions (vehicles traveling through parking lots Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.2-20 ESA A ®130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report Apol 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 3.4 Air Quality or parking garages), it was conservatively assumed that a vehicle would travel onsite for 0.2 miles. Because the Specific Plan requires a program -level evaluation and the exact timing, nature of construction, and location of the development of new residential, commercial, and mixed land uses is unknown, it is not possible to determine the localized impacts from or to potential future development. Therefore, the analysis discusses impacts from Toxic Air contaminants on a qualitative basis based on compliance with the screening levels. If implementation of the Specific Plan exceeds the screening levels, then dispersion modeling would be necessary to determine the potential impacts on localized receptor. 3.2.5 Impact Analysis Impact 3.2.1: Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan. As described in Section 3. 10, Population and Housing, the additional of 833 residential units and 289,135 square feet of non-residential uses at build out of the Specific Plan would generate a population of approximately 3,665 persons and 755 employees at build out and full occupancy, which would be within SCAG's growth projections, and thus would be consistent with the 2012 AQMP. As a result, implementation of the Specific Plan would be consistent with the 2012 AQMP, and impacts would not occur. The Specific Plan implements infill development, located in an urbanized area with existing infrastructure, near the transit line. Thus, the Specific Plan would support AQMP objectives to reduce trips, and would aid in the implementation of the AQMP. In addition, the employment generating uses that would be implemented with the Specific Plan would provide new employment opportunities for residents that could reduce regional commute trips. The Specific Plan would utilize, and make better use of, existing infrastructure, as roadways, drainage, sewer and other infrastructure would accommodate build out of the Specific Plan as described in Section, 3.12, Utilities and Service Systems, and would be consistent with the SCAG objective to "Encourage patterns of urban development and land use that reduce costs in infrastructure construction and make better use of existing facilities." The Specific Plan would be consistent with SCAG's objective to reduce vehicle use and promote infill development. As a result, the Specific. Plan would comply with Consistency Criterion No. 1 listed above in the Section 3.2.4, Methodology. In regards to Consistency Criterion No. 2, which evaluates the potential of the proposed Project to increase the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations, the CO hotspot analysis (described below) indicates that the Specific Plan would not result in a violation of the state one- hour or eight-hour CO concentration standards and no significant adverse impacts are anticipated. Therefore, the Specific Plan is consistent with Consistency Criterion No.2, and impacts related to conflict with or obstruction with an applicable air quality plan would be less than significant. Mitigation: No mitigation required Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.2-21 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3A Air Quality Significance Determination: Less than significant Impact 3.2.2: Violate any regional air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation. Construction Construction activities would occur intermittently at different sites in the planning area throughout build -out, which is anticipated to occur in 2035. Although the related impacts at any one location would be temporary, construction of individual projects under the proposed Specific Plan could cause adverse effects on local air quality. Construction activities could generate substantial amounts of dust (including PMIo and PM2.5) primarily from "fugitive" sources (i.e., emissions released through means other than through a stack or tailpipe) and other criteria air pollutants primarily from the operation of heavy equipment construction machinery (primarily diesel operated) and construction worker automobile trips (primarily gasoline operated). In addition, secondary impacts from upgrading or constructing new infrastructure upgrade would occur as a result of the implementation of the Specific Plan. Fugitive dust emissions would vary from day to day, depending on the level and type of activity, silt content of the soil, and the prevailing weather. Sources of fugitive dust during construction could include vehicle movement over paved and unpaved surfaces, demolition, excavation, earth movement, grading, and wind erosion from exposed surfaces. In addition, buildings constructed prior to 1980 often contain asbestos used in insulation, fire retardants, or building materials (floor tile, roofing, etc.) and lead-based paint. As such, demolition activities of such buildings could involve removal and disposal of asbestos and lead-based paint. Airborne asbestos fibers and lead dust pose a serious health threat. The demolition, renovation and removal of asbestos -containing building materials would be subject to the requirements of SCAQMD Rule 1403, which are described above in the Regulatory Setting. Construction activities would also result in the emission of other criteria pollutants from equipment exhaust, construction -related vehicular activity and construction worker automobile trips. Emission levels for construction activities would vary depending on the number and type of equipment, duration of use, operation schedules, and the number of construction workers. Criteria pollutant emissions of ROG and NO,, from these emission sources would incrementally add to the regional atmospheric loading of ozone precursors during Project construction. Mobile source emissions, primarily NOx, would result from the use of construction equipment such as graders, backhoes, and cranes. During the finishing phase, paving operations and the application of architectural coatings (i.e., paints) and other building materials would release ROG, The assessment of construction air quality impacts considers each of these potential sources. It is mandatory for all construction projects in the SCAB to comply with SCAQMD Rule 403 for fugitive dust (SCAQMD, 2005b). Specific Rule 403 control requirements include, but are not limited to, applying water in sufficient quantities to prevent the generation of visible dust plumes, Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.2-22 ESA r D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting imparat,ts, and Mitigation Measures _........ - . 3.4 Air Quality applying soil binders to uncovered areas, reestablishing ground cover as quickly as possible, utilizing a wheel washing system to remove bulk material from tires and vehicle undercarriages before vehicles exit the Project site, and maintaining effective cover over exposed areas. Because of the uncertainty of timing and methods of construction activities that would occur , under the proposed Specific Plan, a worst-case construction scenario is analyzed here -in. Build out of the Specific Plan is anticipated to occur over 20 years with the location, type, and timing of construction determined by market demand. As discussed under the methodology, it was conservatively assumed that up to 10 percent of the net growth could occur in any given year. Construction was assumed to involve the demolition of existing buildings, site grading, building construction, paving and architectural coating. In the absence of detailed construction scheduling information, worst case assumptions were applied for the analysis of construction emissions. SCAQMD Rule 402 identifies standards to reduce quantities of air contaminants or other materials which cause injury, detriment, nuisance or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause or have natural tendency to cause injury or damage to business or property. SCAQMD Rule 403 regulates operations, which periodically may cause fugitive dust emissions into the atmosphere. Unmitigated emissions take into account the requirements under SCAQMD Rule 403. Construction scheduling was based on CalEEMod defaults and typical construction scheduling, and CaIEEMod default equipment was used. The emissions estimates are based on the conservative estimate of 10 percent of the net development could occur in any given year, which was estimated to start in 2016. Due to the changeover in construction fleets as old equipment is replaced with new, it is anticipated that maximum daily emissions would decrease as development occurs in future years. Unmitigated daily regional construction -related emissions are presented in Table 3.2-6, which shows the highest daily emission estimate for each construction phase during 2016 and for the overlap of various construction phases assuming that more than one development project under the Specific Plan occurs at the same time. As shown, unmitigated emissions would exceed the SCAQMD daily significance thresholds when three or more phases overlap, or three or more development projects are being constructed at the same time. Thresholds are exceeded for NOx. Calculations and modeling output is included in Appendix B of this EIR. Emissions Construction Activities TABLE 3.2-6 UNMITIGATED CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS Pollutant Estimated Maximum Daily Emissions (lbs/day) ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.6 2016 - Unmitigated Fugitive Dust Emissions I - - 1.05 0.16 30953 Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.2-23 ESA / D1 April 2015 Draft Environmental Impact Report 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures ...... 3.4 Air Quality TABLE 3.2-6 UNMITIGATED CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS Emissions Pollutant Construction Activities Estimated Maximum Daily Emissions (lbs/day) ROG NOx CO SO2 PMta PM2.6 Off -Road Emissions 4.29 45.66 On -Road Emissions 0.28 3.38 Total Emissions 4.57 49.03 Regional Significance Threshold 75 100 Significant Impact? No No �ding No No Fugitive Dust Emissions No - Off -Road Emissions 3.67 38.45 On -Road Emissions 0.07 0.09 Total Emissions 3.74 38.54 Regional Significance Threshold 75 100 Significant Impact? No No litllllg "t1tNft)tbkl �% ii/% 150 150 55 No Off -Road Emissions 3.41 28.51 On -Road Emissions 0.73 3.15 Total Emissions 4.14 31.65 Regional Significance Threshold 75 100 Significant Impact? No No 550 150 150 Off -Road Emissions 2.09 22.39 On -Road Emissions 0.07 0.09 Total Emissions 2.16 22.48 Regional Significance Threshold 75 100 Significant Impact? No No 1.43 1.21 550 150 Off -Road Emissions 22.19 2.73 On -Road Emissions 0.09 0.12 Total Emissions 22.28 2.86 Regional Significance Threshold 75 100 Significant Impact? No No 35.03 0.04 3.34 2.14 3.59 0.01 0.41 0.14 38.62 0.05 4.80 2.44 550 150 150 55 No No No No 55 - 2.63 1.42 26.08 0.03 2.20 2.02 1.04 0.00 0.17 0.05 27.12 0.03 5.00 3.49 550 150 150 55 No No No No a 18.51 0.03 1.97 1.85 10.11 0.02 1.36 0.40 28.62 0.05 3.33 2.25 550 150 150 55 No No No No 14.82 0.02 1.26 1.16 1.04 0.00 0.17 0.05 15.86 0.02 1.43 1.21 550 150 150 55 No No No No 1.88 0.00 0.20 0.20 1.39 0.00 0.23 0.06 3.27 0.01 0.42 0.26 550 150 150 55 No No No No Phase Overlap - Unmitigated ICfI$Olitgact�d o/% /� %/// Total Emissions 8.30 87.57 65.74 0.08 9.80 5.93 Regional Significance Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Significant Impact? No No No No No No ... .. -------- . -,--- m... Baldwin ParkSpecific Plan Project ------ 3.2-24 ESA I D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report Apol 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mhfigation Measures ..._ ' ee ......... 3.4 Air Quality TABLE 3.2-6 UNMITIGATED CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS Emissions Pollutant Estimated Maximum Daily Emissions (lbs/day) Construction Activities ROG NOx CO SOz PM10 PMzs Cdigao�at�crlP,trdift Og Itllit� aprpfrocgGoc Total Emissions 14.60 141.70 110.21 0.15 14.56 9.38 Regional Significance Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Significant Impact? No YES No No No No I�d"trfar.�NG4�t1o1, f�t4GN� tiuil�Bltf� t�rr�lrr��lMfarl 6 roI�GPoEt1r`Irt��aaly¢t� %; ' !�! Total Emissions 32.74 112.91 84.86 0.11 11.65 7.39 Regional Significance Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Significant Impact? No YES No No No No IamraG�k(t�rti, f frlGflnGaiilm tttddijlrh1%ti.pciGGarpitkrGtt3CtrlG iting ` Total Emissions 36.88 144.56 113.48 0.16 14.98 9.64 Regional Significance Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Significant Impact? No YES No No No No o ��r 0C9i�191'091y faftlIiNa 9i100rplfke GN()Iflt ojisff4Ctlttp;G �c�tkl(G 4&tdGtt Total Emissions 40.62 183.10 140.60 0.19 19.98 13.13 Regional Significance Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Significant Impact? No YES No No No No NOTE: Construction emissions would be slightly different during tha summerand winter seasons. Maximum daily emissioll's of ROG and NOx would generally be higher aGIuirir1g the winter while emissions of CO mid S02 would generally be higher in the surnmer. The maximum emissions for each pollutant over the course of the summer and winter seasons are she n in this table. SOURCE: ESA CaIEEMod Modeling, 2015. Mitigated daily construction -related emissions are provided in Table 3.2-7, which shows that with implementation of Mitigation Measures AIR -1 and AIR -2, emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD daily significance thresholds with 10 percent of the Specific Plan development being constructed simultaneously. Ten percent consists of five projects under construction concurrently with two having grading phases at the same time. While it is unlikely that this level of construction would occur; however, because the construction intensity, phasing, length, and schedule of individual projects that would be implemented by the Specific Plan is unknown, there is the possibility that more projects could occur at the same time, or different phasing combinations could overlap to result in increased levels of emissions that would exceed thresholds after implementation of mitigation. Therefore construction impacts related to regional air pollutants would be significant and unavoidable. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.2-25 ESA I D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts. and Mitigation Measures .... ........ ........................... ------------ . ......................................................... ..... . 3.4 Air Quality TABLE 3.2-7 MITIGATED CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS Emissions I Pollutant Construction Activities Estimated Maximum Daily Emissions (lbs/day) ROG NOx CO SO2 PM110 I PM2.5 I 2016 - Unmitigated Phase Overlap - Unmitigated Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.2-26 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report Apdl 2015 Fugitive Dust Emissions 0.72 0.11 Off -Road Emissions 0.60 13.88 25.26 0.04 0.06 0.06 On -Road Emissions 0.28 3.38 3.59 0.00 0.41 0.14 Total Emissions 0.88 17.25 28.85 0.04 1.20 0.32 Regional Significance Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Significant Impact? No No No No No No Fugitive Dust Emissions - - - 1.81 0.98 Off -Road Emissions 0.49 11.42 20.38 0.03 0.05 0.05 On -Road Emissions 0.07 0.09 1.04 0.00 0.17 0.05 Total Emissions 0.56 11.52 21.42 0.03 2.03 1.07 Regional Significance Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Significant Impact? No No No No No No W 6p w9 44 ""x,, �bw , , , -r X""., H A, f�"" 1,4 W 0 Off -Road Emissi6ns 1.05 11.02 18.29 0.03 0.18 0.18 On -Road Emissions 0.73 3.15 10.11 0.02 1.36 0.40 Total Emissions 1.78 14.17 28.40 0.05 1.54 0.58 Regional Significance Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Significant Impact? No No No No No No A, , �/, ", / J", 1, 1 1 Off -Road Emissions 0.33 9.83 16.93 0.02 0.04 0.04 On -Road Emissions 0.07 0.09 1.04 0.00 0.17 0.05 Total Emissions 0.40 9.92 17.97 0.02 0.21 0.08 Regional Significance Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Significant Impact? No No No No No No 00, 7 Off -Road Emissions 21.87 1.06 1.83 000 0.00 0.00 On -Road Emissions 0.09 0.12 0.14 0.00 0.23 0.06 Total Emissions 21.97 1.18 1.97 0.01 0.23 0.07 Regional Significance Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Significant Impact? No No No ........... No No No Phase Overlap - Unmitigated Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.2-26 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report Apdl 2015 Emissions 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures ........ 3.4 Air Quality TABLE 3.2-7 MITIGATED CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS Pollutant Total Emissions 26.15 65.56 120.02 0.18 7.24 3.19 Regional Significance Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Significant Impact? No No No No No No Mitigation required for reducing localized impacts from PM10 and PM25 were included in this mitigation summary although mitigation of PMIo and PM2.5 is not required at the regional level. NOTE: Construction emissions would be slightly different during the summer and winter seasons. Maximum daily emissions of ROG and NOx would generally be higher during the winter while emissions of CO and SO2 would generally be higher in the summer. The maximum emissions for each pollutant over the course of the summer and winter seasons are shown in this table. SOURCE: ESA CalEEMod Modeling, 2015. Local Construction Air Quality Impacts - Criteria Air Pollutants As discussed previously, the daily on-site construction emissions generated by the proposed Specific Plan were evaluated against SCAQMD's LSTs for a one -acre, two -acre, and five -acre sites to determine whether the emissions would cause or contribute to adverse localized air quality impacts. The Specific Plan would implement infill mixed use development. Therefore, it is assumed that the nearest sensitive receptor would be adjacent to the project site under construction. Since the mass rate look -up tables provided by SCAQN4D only provides LSTs at receptor distances of 82, 164, 328, 656, and 1,640 feet, the LSTs for a receptor distance of 82 feet Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.2-27 ESA i D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 Estimated Maximum Daily Emissions (lbs/day) Construction Activities ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10' PMz.s' Total Emissions 8.30 87.57 65.74 0.08 9.80 5.93 Regional Significance Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Significant Impact? No No No No No No id?�fPilCCradlfulqf,)r 1t KNIj1tf1 fMSMl9gIFgifdN. %,. .",, ,, „..;, Total Emisslons 3.62 52.86 96.63 0.14 4.98 2.05 Regional Significance Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Significant Impact? No No No No No No herrn I4190i" f0ti#6w�; 9N0010 C" rt, t ror llmc gt clamor l o c"ipI " Total Emissions 23.81 39.87 70.21 0.10 3.66 1.54 Regional Significance Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Significant Impact? No No No No No No i�att��o9tt#ra�NM 9"ardprtn� �#!� t�tik��91,4�rd�tfUc.1)bgt �l,�h"�t�6(cltiloR gal#I� Total Emissions 25.59 54.04 98.60 0.15 5.21 2.11 Regional Significance Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Significant Impact? No No No No No No Total Emissions 26.15 65.56 120.02 0.18 7.24 3.19 Regional Significance Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Significant Impact? No No No No No No Mitigation required for reducing localized impacts from PM10 and PM25 were included in this mitigation summary although mitigation of PMIo and PM2.5 is not required at the regional level. NOTE: Construction emissions would be slightly different during the summer and winter seasons. Maximum daily emissions of ROG and NOx would generally be higher during the winter while emissions of CO and SO2 would generally be higher in the summer. The maximum emissions for each pollutant over the course of the summer and winter seasons are shown in this table. SOURCE: ESA CalEEMod Modeling, 2015. Local Construction Air Quality Impacts - Criteria Air Pollutants As discussed previously, the daily on-site construction emissions generated by the proposed Specific Plan were evaluated against SCAQMD's LSTs for a one -acre, two -acre, and five -acre sites to determine whether the emissions would cause or contribute to adverse localized air quality impacts. The Specific Plan would implement infill mixed use development. Therefore, it is assumed that the nearest sensitive receptor would be adjacent to the project site under construction. Since the mass rate look -up tables provided by SCAQN4D only provides LSTs at receptor distances of 82, 164, 328, 656, and 1,640 feet, the LSTs for a receptor distance of 82 feet Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.2-27 ESA i D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 3 4 Air Quality are used to evaluate the potential localized air quality impacts associated with the Specific Plan's peak day construction emissions. 3 Table 3.2-8 identifies the daily unmitigated, localized on-site emissions that are estimated to occur during the Specific Plan's worst-case construction scenario. As shown, the daily unmitigated emissions would exceed the applicable SCAQMD LSTs for NOx, PMIo and PM2,5 for a one -acre site in SRA 8 when more than one project is constructed at a time and when more than one project is within 82 feet of the same receptor. PMto and PM2.5 emissions would exceed LST thresholds if two or more projects are constructed at the same time and within 82 feet of the same receptor. For NOx, exceedance would be seen if three or more projects are constructed within 82 feet of the same receptor at the same time. The emissions for the remaining pollutant of concern (CO) would not exceed the applicable SCAQMD LST under any scenario. As distances between project sites and receptors increase, the allowed daily emissions increase and at 656 feet between construction sites and the nearest receptor, the worst case construction activities would be less than significant for all criteria pollutants of concern. However, because it is unknown how many projects would be under construction at the same time and what the distances would be between projects and the nearest receptors, a worst case assessment was assumed with respect to LST impacts. As the Specific Plan's worst-case construction emissions would exceed SCAQMM's applicable LST for NOx, PMto PM2.5 during overlap of the various construction phases, the localized air quality impacts associated with NOx, PM10 and PM2,5 would be significant. 3 Although the nearest off-site sensitive receptors are located closer than 82 feet of the Project site, SCAQMD's LST methodology states that projects with boundaries located closer than 82 feet (25 meters) to the nearest receptor should use the LSTs for receptors located at 82 feet. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.2-28 ESA ( D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting,, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures ... ... _e -. ..�_ ..... ""' 3A Air Quality TABLE 3.2-8 LOCALIZED POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS FROM CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS Emissions Source Daily (lbs/day) Pollutant NOx CO PMto PM2.5 Demolition 45.69 35.07 4.39 2.30 Grading 38.45 26.09 4.83 3.44 Building Construction 28.55 18.66 1.99 1.85 Paving 22.39 14.83 1.26 1.16 Architectural Coating273 .... 1.90 .... 0.20 ...�.- 0.20 -._ Demolition & Grading 84.14 61.16 9.22 5.74 Demolition, Grading, Paving & Building Construction 135.08 94.65 12.47 8.76 Demolition, Grading, Building Construction & Architectural Coating 115.43 81.72 11.41 7.79 Demolition, Grading, Paving, Building Construction & Architectural 166.37 115.22 14.66 10.81 Coating Demolition, Grading, Grading, Paving, Building Construction & 204.82 141.31 19.49 14.25 Architectural Coating SCAQMDThresholds 1 -acre 89 623 5 3 2 -acre 128 953 7 5 5 -acre 203 1733 14 8 Significant? YES No ES YES SOURCE: ESA CaIEEMod Modeling, 2015. However, with implementation of Mitigation Measure Air -2, the total on-site emissions of NOx, PM10 and PM2 5 generated under the Specific Plan's worst-case construction scenarios would be reduced to below the SCAQMD's applicable LST. The total mitigated emissions that would result from implementation of Mitigation Measure AIR -2 during construction activities are shown in Table 3.2-9. TABLE 3.2-9 LOCALIZED POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS FROM MITIGATED CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS Pollutant Emissions Source NOx c0 PM10 PM2.5 Daily (lbs/day) Demolition 13.91 25.30 0.79 0.17 Grading 11.43 20.39 1.86 1.03 Building Construction 11.07 18.44 0.20 0.19 Paving 9.83 16.94 0.04 0.04 Architectural Coating 1.06 1.83 0.01 0.00 Baldwin Park roD Specific Plan Project 3.2-29 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures .,a,... --------- 3 4 Air Quality TABLE 3.2-9 LOCALIZED POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS FROM MITIGATED CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS Pollutant Emissions Source NOx CO PM10 PM2.6 Daily (lbs/day) Demolition & Grading 25.34 45.69 2.65 1.20 Demolition, Grading, Paving & Building Construction 46.23 81.08 2.89 1.42 Demolition, Grading, Building Construction & Architectural Coating 37.47 65.97 2.86 1.39 Demolition, Grading, Paving, Building Construction & Architectural 58.37 101.35 3.10 1.62 Coating Demolition, Grading, Grading, Paving, Building Construction & 69.79 121.75 4.96 2.64 Architectural Coating SCAQMD Thresholds 1 -acre 89 623 5 3 2 -acre 128 953 7 5 5 -acre 203 1733 14 8 Significant? No No No No SOURCE: ESA CaIEEMod Modeling, 2015 Implementation of Mitigation Measure AIR -2 would reduce impacts in the provided construction scenarios to below SCAQMD's applicable LSTs. However, because the construction intensity and schedule of individual projects for the development within the proposed Specific Plan area is unknown, there is the possibility that more development/construction could occur at the same time, or different phasing combinations could overlap to result in increased levels of emissions. Therefore construction impacts on localized air pollutants would remain significant and unavoidable. Operation The addition of 833 residential units and 289,135 square feet of non-residential uses at build out of the Specific Plan would result in long-term regional emissions of criteria air pollutants and ozone precursors associated with area sources, such as natural gas consumption, landscaping, applications of architectural coatings, and consumer products, in addition to operational mobile emissions. According to the traffic study prepared for the proposed Specific Plan, development of the proposed residential building and removal of the existing uses at the Project site uses would result in a net increase in 1,084 vehicle trips per day when compared to existing conditions. Operations emissions associated with the build out of the proposed Specific Plan were modeled and the estimated operations emissions are provided in Table 3.2-10. As shown, the proposed Specific Plan would result in long-term regional emissions of criteria air pollutants and ozone precursors that are below SCAQMD's applicable thresholds. Therefore, the Specific Plan's operational emissions would not result in or substantially contribute to emissions concentrations that exceed the NAAQS and California Ambient Air Quality Standards and impacts would be less than significant. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.2-30 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures ........ 3.4 Air Quality TABLE 3.2-10 UNMITIGATED OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS Proposed Project Area 31.52 Pollutant 69.83 0.00 Emissions Source ROG NOx CO Sox PM10 PMzs ............... - De.._.. ily Emissions (lbs/day) Mobile 30.94 66.17 Existing 1.24 78.14 22.07 Total 63.03 Area 6.95 0.13 9.99 0.01 1.31 1.31 Energy 0.04 0.40 0.28 0.00 0.03 0.03 Mobile 10.96 26.09 107.42 0.19 12.92 3.71 Total 17.95 26.62 117.69 0.21 14.26 5.05 Proposed Project Area 31.52 0.80 69.83 0.00 1.41 1.40 Energy 0.57 5.04 3.46 0.03 0.39 0.39 Mobile 30.94 66.17 310.81 1.24 78.14 22.07 Total 63.03 72.01 384.10 1.27 79.94 23.86 Net Emissions Area 24.57 0.67 59.84 -0.01 0.11 0.09 Energy 0.52 4.64 3.18 0.03 0.36 0.36 Mobile 19.99 40.08 203.39 1.04 65.22 18.36 Total Net Emissions 45.08 45.39 266.41 1.06 65.68 18.81 SCAQMD Thresholds 55 55 550 150 150 55 Siianificant _ No _ No No.. ....._ No..._ NR........... NO... SOURCE: ESA CaIEEMod Modeling 2015 Localized Operational Air Quality Impacts - Criteria Air Pollutants The proposed Specific Plan's net increase in localized operational emissions is shown in Table 3.2-11. TABLE 3.2-11 LOCALIZED POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS FROM NET OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS ....� ....._ _.._� ._-..,�--� Pollutant Emissions Source NOx CO PM10 PM2.6 Daily (lbs/day) Net Emissions 5.31 63.02 1.82 0.84 SCAQMD Thresholds 69 535 2 1 Significant �..� .� arm ....�.�. No �.......- � No - .. �...... 0 .. ....... ...� �.� SOURCE: ESA CalEEModModeling January.2015 Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.2-31 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2016 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 3 4 Air Quality As shown in Table 3.2-11, the total net operational -related emissions generated locally would not exceed SCAQMD's applicable operational LSTs. Thus, localized air quality impacts during operations of new land uses from implementation of the Specific Plan would not violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality standard, and impacts would be less than significant. Localized Operational Air Quality Impacts - CO Hotspots Sixteen local intersections were analyzed as part of the traffic study that was prepared for the proposed Specific Plan (The Mobility Group, 2015). The existing plus project and future with peak hour project conditions were evaluated against the screening level threshold of 24,000 vehicles per hour. Peak hourly traffic volumes for each of the study area intersections are shown in Table 3.2-12. As shown, the maximum hourly traffic under both scenarios is seen at the Ramona Boulevard amd Maine Avenue intersection are 4,690 vehicles per hour and 5,174 vehicles per hour respectively for the existing with project and future with project scenarios. As the peak hour traffic at none of the intersections comes close to the 24,000 vehicles per hour (the more conservative screening threshold), CO emissions from these vehicles volumes would be less than significant. TABLE 3.2-12 PEAK HOURLY TRAFFIC VOLUMES Existing Plus Project Future Plus Project Intersection AM PM AM PM Ramona Boulevard and Main Avenue 3,375 4,690 3,712 5,174 Ramona Boulevard and Bogart Avenue 2,527 2,407 2,006 2,638 Ramona Boulevard and Downing Avenue 2,147 2,380 2,352 2,608 Ramona Boulevard and Badillo Street 1,980 2,286 2,173 2,508 Badillo Street & Puente Avenue 2,046 2,154 2,242 2,365 Maine Avenue and Palmrose Street 2,033 1,793 1,499 2,022 Maine Avenue & Clark Street 1,889 2,019 2,089 2,274 Maine Avenue & Los Angeles Street 2,784 2,915 3,064 3,247 Pacific Avenue & Bogart Avenue 1,675 2,216 1,880 2,515 Pacific Avenue & Downing Avenue 1,784 2,251 1,975 2,517 Pacific Avenue & Big Dalton Avenue 1,921 2,212 2,126 2,479 Ramona Boulevard & Cesar Chavez Drive 2,369 3,306 2,558 3,577 Ramona Boulevard & Baldwin Park Boulevard 2,858 3,804 3,186 4,265 Ramona Boulevard & Steward Avenue 1,946 2,197 2,138 2,420 Ramona Boulevard & Merced Avenue 2,566 2,783 2,824 3,071 Merced Avenue & Baldwin Park Boulevard 2,715 2,947 3,038 3,342 Screening Threshold 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 Significant? No No No No SOURCE: The Mobility Group, 2015 Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.2-32 ESA ( D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures .„ ..__..._ 3.4 Air Quality As detailed in Section 3.13, Transportation and Traffic, a review of the 2010 Congestion Management Plan (CMP) shows that four arterial monitoring stations and five freeway monitoring stations are close to the Specific Plan area and where CMP impacts could potentially occur from build out of the Specific Plan. The maximum number of trips that the Specific Plan at build out would add to any of the CMP arterial monitoring stations would be 43 pm trips at Azusa Avenue and Cameron Avenue. As the threshold of 50 or more trips for arterial roadways would not be exceeded, impacts related to CMP arterials would be less than significant. The maximum number of one-way Specific Plan trips that would be added to a freeway segment would be in the pm peak hour with 55 trips on I-10 east of Peck Road. As these volumes are well below the CMP threshold of 150 trips, impacts to CMP freeways would be less than significant. The Specific Plan would generate about 186 net additional transit trips (101 inbound trips and 85 outbound trips) in the am peak hour, and about 365 additional transit trips (184 inbound and 181 outbound) in the pm peak hour. Based on the existing service frequency of transit lines near the Specific Plan area, the hourly directional capacity of the transit lines is 2,151. The highest directional volume of peak -hour trips added by the Specific Plan would be about 8.5 percent of the total hourly directional transit capacity, which would not cause the capacity of the transit system to be substantially exceeded. Therefore, the proposed Specific Plan would not create any significant impacts on the transit systems serving the Specific Plan area. Therefore, as none of the thresholds for consistency to the CMP would be exceeded, the proposed Specific Plan is consistent with the congestion management plan, and violation of an air quality standard or contribution to an existing or projected air quality standard from operation of the proposed Specific Plan would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measure AIR -1: The City shall ensure that project approvals within the Specific Plan area require that all onsite vehicles and equipment with horsepower greater than 50 shall meet, at a minimum, USEPA Tier IV interim engine certification requirements. If Tier IV interim equipment is not available, the contractor may apply other available technologies available for construction equipment such that it would achieve a comparable reduction in NOx and PM emissions comparable to that of Tier IV construction equipment. Where alternatives to USEPA Tier IV are utilized, the contractor shall be required to show evidence to the City that these alternative technologies would achieve comparable emissions reductions. Certifications or alternative reduction strategies shall be required prior to receiving a construction permit. Mitigation Measure AIR -2: The City shall ensure that project approvals within the Specific Plan area require that all active construction areas shall be watered at least four times daily to reduce fugitive dust emissions from grading, excavation, and other ground preparation. Watering shall be sufficient to prevent airborne dust from leaving the site. Increased watering frequency may be necessary whenever wind speeds exceed 15 miles per hour. Reclaimed water shall be used whenever possible. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.2-33 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 3.4 Air Quality Significance after Mitigation: Even with the implementation of Mitigation Measures AIR -1 and AIR -2 impacts related to construction from implementation of the Specific Plan would be significant because the construction intensity and schedule of individual projects is unknown, and there is the possibility that substantial construction/development could occur at the same time, or different phasing combinations could overlap to result in increased levels of emissions. Therefore, impacts related to violation of a regional air quality standard or contribution to an existing or projected air quality violation would be significant and unavoidable. Impact 3.2-3: Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the Project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors). A cumulative impact arises when two or more individual effects which, when considered together, are considerable or which compound or increase other environmental impacts. Cumulative impacts can result from individually minor but collectively significant impacts, meaning that the project's incremental effects must be viewed in connection with the effects of past, current, and probable future projects. As the Basin is currently in non -attainment for ozone, PMIo, and PM2,5, cumulative development consisting of the proposed Specific Plan along with other reasonably foreseeable future projects in the Basin as a whole could violate an air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation. This is considered to be a significant cumulative impact. With respect to determining the significance of the proposed Specific Plan's contribution to regional emissions, the SCAQMD neither recommends quantified analyses of cumulative construction emissions nor provides methodologies or thresholds of significance to be used to assess cumulative construction impacts. According to the SCAQMD, individual construction projects that exceed the SCAQMD recommended daily thresholds for project -specific impacts would cause a cumulatively considerable increase in emissions for those pollutants for which the Basin is in non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. As discussed previously, the worst-case daily construction emissions associated with the proposed Specific Plan would exceed the SCAQMD's construction thresholds for NOx, PMIo, and PM2.5. Therefore, as pollutants for which the Basin is in non -attainment (i.e., ozone, PMIo, and PM2,5) associated with the proposed project would exceed SCAQMD's respective thresholds for construction, these pollutant emissions would, in conjunction with other past, current, and probable future construction projects, would be cumulatively considerable and significant and unavoidable. As described above, operational emissions associated with vehicular traffic, energy consumption and other area sources (such as landscaping, use of consumer products) would not exceed SCAQMD daily thresholds for ROG, NO,,, CO, PMIo and PM2,5 upon build of the Specific Plan. As Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.2-34 ESA I D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Settinag, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures ..... _.... ......... 3.4 Air Quality the Specific Plan would result in a less than significant impact with respect to SCAQMD thresholds during operation it would not be cumulatively considerable. Additionally, the proposed Specific Plan would be consistent with regional AQMP strategies, such as those related to high- density, infill development centered around public transit opportunities, designed to improve air quality in the Basin and comply with applicable standards. Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measure AIR -1 and AIR -2 shall be implemented to reduce cumulative construction related air quality impacts. Significance after Mitigation: Significant and Unavoidable. Implementation of Mitigation Measures AIR -1 and AIR -2 would reduce construction emissions from development projects that would occur from implementation of the proposed Specific Plan; however, impacts after mitigation would remain cumulatively considerable. Impact 3.2.4: Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, including increased levels of TACs. In an urbanized environment, air pollutant concentrations are usually most prominent along busy streets and at busy intersections, where automotive exhausts can build up while vehicles stop and idle or slow down to approach and proceed through or make turning movements. The primary source of potential air toxics associated with operation of the proposed Specific Plan include diesel particulates from construction equipment during construction, and upon completion of construction, diesel particulates from delivery trucks (e.g., truck traffic on local streets and onsite truck idling) to the commercial and retail uses proposed by the Specific Plan. Construction activities would take place intermittently as various development projects occur within the Specific Plan area throughout the 20 -year build out period. Because development projects would be short-term and scattered throughout the Specific Plan area, sensitive receptors would be exposed for short-term limited time during nearby construction activities, but would not be exposed to construction emissions over the entire construction period. Health risk is evaluated assuming a constant exposure to emissions of a 70 -year lifetime, 24 hours a day, seven days a week. As the exposure to receptors would be short-term and limited during infill development activities, DPM impacts from construction activities would be considered less than significant. In addition, implementation of Mitigation Measure AIR -I would further reduce impacts related to TACs. Implementation of the proposed Specific Plan would result in new land uses in the Specific Plan area consisting of residential and non-residential employment generating uses that may utilize solvents, cleaners, and motor vehicle emissions, which are not anticipated to emit TAC emissions in appreciable quantities. In addition, any commercial use that would be a stationary source of TAC emissions would be subject to the rules and regulations of SCAQMD. As discussed previously, TACs are regulated at the federal, state, and local levels. At the local level, SCAQMD Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.2-35 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3, Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures ..... 3.4 Air Quality Regulation XIV (Toxics and Other Non -Criteria Pollutants), and in particular Rule 1401 (New Source Review), would require that all sources that possess the potential to emit TACs be required to obtain permits from SCAQMD. Permits are granted to these operations if they are constructed and operated in accordance with applicable regulations, including new source review standards and air toxics control measures. ARB's Handbook includes the recommendation to avoid the siting of new sensitive land uses (e.g., residences, schools) within 500 feet of freeways, urban roads with 100,000 vehicles/day, or rural roads with 50,000 vehicles/day. None of the proposed residential uses in the Specific Plan area would be located within 500 feet of a freeway. In addition, based on the projected 2035 average daily traffic (ADT) volume on roadways in the Specific Plan area, no residential uses would be located within 500 feet of an urban road with 100,000 vehicles per day. Therefore, the location of the proposed residential uses would be in concurrence with ARB recommendations. Based on the criteria in the ARB guidance document, it can be ascertained that the proposed Specific Plan would not have the potential to expose sensitive receptors to TACs from mobile sources to an extent that health risks could result. This impact would be less than significant. New sensitive receptors would be exposed to diesel -fueled Metrolink trains that form an existing source of TAC emissions. Sensitive receptors introduced by the proposed Specific Plan would primarily include residential uses. The Baldwin Park Metrolink station is located at 3825 Downing Avenue, within the Specific Plan area. The station is served by the San Bernardino line. As many as 19 trains traverse the station westbound to Los Angeles and an equal number trains travel through the station east to San Bernardino. Additionally, Union Pacific also uses this rail line and has an average of 4 freight trains traversing the project area daily. The approximate 42 daily train trips are only present intermittently and for a brief time. As such, the train trips are not a constant source of emissions. ARB's Air Quality and Land Use Handbook provides general guidance that can be applied to projects proposed in the vicinity of line source emissions, such as freeways, train tracks, etc. The report, based on traffic -related studies, states that the additional non -cancer health risk attributable to proximity, was strongest within 300 feet. Therefore, impacts from Metrolink trains would be greatest within 300 feet of the tracks, and sensitive receptors within 300 feet from the tracks could potentially be exposed to significant levels of DPM emissions. Implementation of Mitigation Measures AIR -3 and AIR -4 would reduce potential impacts related to exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, including TACs, to a less -than - significant level. Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measure AIR -3: The City shall ensure that project approvals within the Specific Plan area require that any new sources of TAC emissions that are proposed to be located within 300 feet of existing sensitive receptors shall implement all available best management practices and control technologies to reduce emissions to below regulatory thresholds that exist at the time of construction. Compliance with this requirement shall be confirmed through generation of a health risk assessment that demonstrates the emissions Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.2-36 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 p Mitigation Measures 3. Environmental Setting . Impacts, and Miti 3.4 Air Quality levels and risks to nearby receptors are less than 10 in one million increase in cancer risk, and less than 1 for non -cancer risk, unless thresholds are superseded by more current SCAQMD threshold. Health risk assessments shall be submitted to the City Planning Division for review and approval prior to beginning of construction. Mitigation Measure AIR -4: The City shall ensure that project approvals within the Specific Plan area require that any sensitive uses proposed to be located within 500 feet of the Metrolink tracks shall be equipped with a filtered air supply system to maintain units under positive pressure when windows are closed. The ventilation system, whether a central HVAC (heating, ventilation and air conditioning) or a unit -by -unit filtration system, shall include high -efficiency filters meeting minimum efficiency reporting value (MERV) 13, per American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air -Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) Standard 52.2 (equivalent to approximately ASHRAE Standard 52.1 Dust Spot 85%). The efficiency rating of the filtration system shall be determined based on a health risk assessment conducted for the proposed development, such that cancer and non -cancer risks are reduced to a 10 in one million increase in cancer risk, and less than 1 for non -cancer risk, unless thresholds are superseded by more current SCAQMD threshold. Air intake systems for HVAC shall be placed based on exposure modeling to minimize roadway air pollution sources. The ventilation system shall be designed by an engineer certified by ASHRAE, who shall provide a written report documenting that the system offers the best available technology to minimize outdoor to indoor transmission of air pollution. Disclosure to the occupants (buyers and renters) within a 500 -foot radius shall be required regarding the proximity of Metrolink tracks, the occurrence of diesel emissions form Metrolink trains, and the potential increased cancer and non -cancer risks associated with the development location. Significance After Mitigation: Less than significant. Cumulative Impacts The cumulative study area for air quality is the entire South Coast Air Basin (Basin). As the Basin is currently in non -attainment for ozone, PMlo, and PM2.5, cumulative development consisting of build out of the proposed Specific Plan along with other reasonably foreseeable future projects in the Basin as a whole could violate an air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation. This is considered to be a significant cumulative impact. With respect to whether the proposed Specific Plan's contribution to regional emissions is substantial, the SCAQMD neither recommends quantified analyses of cumulative construction emissions nor provides methodologies or thresholds of significance to be used to assess cumulative construction impacts. According to the SCAQMD, individual construction projects that exceed the SCAQMD recommended daily thresholds for project -specific impacts would cause a cumulatively considerable increase in emissions for those pollutants for which the Basin is in non -attainment. As discussed previously, the "worst-case" daily construction emissions Baldwin Park TDD Specific Plan Project 3.2-37 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3, Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures _,_ . 3.4 Air Quality would exceed SCAQMD's construction thresholds. Therefore, pollutant emissions from construction activities would be cumulatively considerable. Operational emissions associated with vehicular traffic, energy consumption and other area sources (such as landscaping, use of consumer products) would not exceed SCAQMD daily thresholds, and would not be cumulatively considerable, as described further under Impact 3.2-3 above. Additionally, the proposed Specific Plan would be consistent with regional AQMP strategies, such as those related to high-density, infill development centered around public transit opportunities, designed to improve air quality in the Basin and comply with applicable standards. Thus, operational impacts related to air quality from implementation of the proposed Specific Plan would be less than cumulatively considerable. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.2-38 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures m ....m 3 4 Air Quality r Bay Area Air Quality Management District (13AAQ. D) 2009. Rev/we:d 1 t -r, tlt Options and JustUit:'tticnn Report CaelUbrnia Envirtounentol Quality Act //I'S� nalicance. October. California Air Resources Board (GARB) 2000. Risk Reduction Plan for Diesel -Fueled Engines and Vehicles, September. GARB 2001. ARB Fact Sheet: Air Pollution Sources, Effects and Control, http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/health/fs/fs2/fs2.htm, updated December 2005. GARB. 2004.2004 Revision to the California State Implementation Plan for Carbon Monoxide Updated Maintenance Plan for Ten Federal Planning Areas. July 22. CARB 2005. Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective, April. CARB 2008. In -Use Off -Road Diesel Vehicle Rule. March 2007 and revised May. CARB 2009. The California Almanac of Emissions and Air Quality 2009 Edition. GARB. 2013a. Ambient Air Quality Standards. Last revised: June 4. Available: <http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/aags/aags2.pdf>. Accessed: January, 2015. CARB. 2013b. Area Designation Maps/State and National. Available: <www.arb.ca.gov/desig/adm/adm.htm/>. Accessed January, 2015. City of Baldwin Park 2002. Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan, November 20. Mobility Group, The 2015. City of Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan Traffic Study. January 23. South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) 1993 CEQA Air Quality Handbook, April. SCAQMD 1998. Rule 403 Fugitive Dust, Last amended in December. SCAQMD 2000x. Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study in the South Coast Air Basin (MATES -77), March. SCAQMD. 2000b. Final Draft An Air Toxics Control Plan for the Next Ten Years. March. SCAQMD 2002. Health Risk rl.sse.s.s'inent Guidance for Analyzing Cancer Risks from Mobile Source Diesel 1�rnissions, December. SCAQMD 2003. Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology, June (Revised 2009). SCAQMD. 2004. Addendum to the Air Toxics Control Plan (March 2000). March. SCAQMD 2005. Guidance Document for Addressing Air Quality Issues in General Plans and Local Planning, May. Baldwin Park TO...� ,... �_._— .,.._...-- —.. D Specific Plan Project 3.2-39 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 3.4 Air Quality SCAQMD 2009 — 2013. Historical data By Year. Accessed at http://www.agmd.gov/home/library/air-quality-data-studies/historical-data-by-year, January 2014. SCAQMD. 2011. SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds. Accessed at <http://www.agmd.gov/CEQA/handbook/signthres.pdf> in January, 2014. SCAQMD. 2013. Final 2012 Air Quality Management Plan. February. UC Davis, Institute of Transportation Studies (UCD ITS). 1997. Transportation Project -Level Carbon Monoxide Protocol- Revised 1997. USD -ITS -RR -99-21. Available http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/lnfoSvcs/EngApps/software.htm. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) 2002. Health Assessment Document for Diesel Engine Exhaust, EPA/600/8-90/057F. http://cfpub.epa.gov/neca/cfm/recordisplay.cfm?deid=29060, May. Accessed March 14, 2008. USEPA. 2013. The Greenbook Nonattainment Areas for Criteria Pollutants. Available at http://www.epa.gov/air/oagps/greenbk/index.html. Accessed April 18, 2014. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.2-40 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 • 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures This section addresses the potential impacts of the project on cultural resources. Cultural resources include prehistoric and historic sites, structures, districts, places, and landscapes, or any other physical evidence associated with human activity considered important to a culture, a subculture, or a community for scientific, traditional, religious or other reason. Under CEQA, paleontological resources, although not associated with past human activity, are grouped within cultural resources. For the purposes of this analysis, cultural resources are categorized into the following groups: archaeological resources, historic resources (including architectural/engineering resources), contemporary Native American resources, human remains, and paleontological resources. Archaeological resources are places where human activity has measurably altered the earth or left deposits of physical remains. Archaeological resources may be either prehistoric -era (before European contact) or historic -era (after European contact). The majority of such places in California are associated with either Native American or Euro -American occupation of the area. The most frequently encountered prehistoric or historic Native American archaeological sites are village settlements with residential areas and sometimes cemeteries; temporary camps where food and raw materials were collected; smaller, briefly occupied sites where tools were manufactured or repaired; and special -use areas like caves, rock shelters, and rock art sites. Historic -era archeological sites may include foundations or features such as privies, corrals, and trash dumps. Historic resources include standing structures, infrastructure, and landscapes of historic or aesthetic significance that are generally 50 years of age or older. In California, historic resources considered for protection tend to focus on architectural sites dating from the Spanish Period (1529-1822) through World War II (WWII) and Post War era facilities. Some resources, however, may have achieved significance within the past 50 years if they meet the criteria for exceptional significance. Historic resources are often associated with archaeological deposits of the same age. Contemporary Native American resources, also called ethnographic resources, can include archaeological resources, rock art, and the prominent topographical areas, features, habitats, plants, animals, and minerals that contemporary Native Americans value and consider essential for the preservation of their traditional values. These locations are sometimes difficult to define and traditional culture often prohibits Native Americans from sharing these locations with the public. Paleontology is a branch of geology that studies the life forms of the past, especially prehistoric life forms, through the study of plant and animal fossils. Paleontological resources represent a limited, non-renewable, and impact -sensitive scientific and educational resource. As defined in this section, paleontological resources are the fossilized remains or traces of multi -cellular invertebrate and vertebrate animals and multi -cellular plants, including their imprints from a Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.3-1 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report Apol 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures _ ......... 3,3 Cultural Resources previous geologic period. Fossil remains such as bones, teeth, shells, and leaves are found in the geologic deposits (rock formations) where they were originally buried. Paleontological resources include not only the actual fossil remains, but also the collecting localities, and the geologic formations containing those localities. The Specific Plan area is located in eastern Los Angeles County along the southern flanks of the Transverse Range geologic province. The Specific Plan area is located on the northern block of the Los Angeles Basin, and it is underlain by alluvial fan deposits consisting of boulders, cobbles, pebbles and sand derived from the San Gabriel Mountains to the north. The San Gabriel River is located approximately 1.5 miles west of the Specific Plan area. The Specific Plan area is an urban area that has been developed for residential, commercial, transit, open space, and civic center uses. The topography is flat with a gradual slope to the southeast towards the San Gabriel River. Prehistoric Setting The abundant and diverse environmental resources of the coastal Los Angeles basin have attracted human inhabitants from the earliest times. The prehistory of the region has been summarized within four major horizons or cultural periods: Early, Millingstone, Intermediate, and Late Prehistoric (Wallace, 1955). The Early period covers the interval from the first presence of humans in southern California until post -glacial times. While people are known to have inhabited southern California beginning at least 13,000 years Before Present (B.P.) (Arnold et al., 2004), the first evidence of human occupation of the Los Angeles area dates to at least 9,000 B.P. These occupations are associated with a period known as the Millingstone Cultural Horizon (7,000-4,000 B.P) (Wallace, 1955; McIntyre, 1990). Departing from the subsistence strategies of their nomadic big -game hunting predecessors, Millingstone populations established more permanent settlements. Settlements were located primarily on the coast and in the vicinity of estuaries, lagoons, lakes, streams, and marshes where a variety of resources, including seeds, fish, shellfish, small mammals, and birds, were exploited. Early Millingstone occupations are typically identified by the presence of handstones (manos) and millingstones (metates), while those Millingstone occupations dating later than 5,000 B.P. contain a mortar and pestle complex as well, signifying an increased dependence on new food sources, such as acorns and starchy tubers. Although many aspects of Millingstone culture persisted, by 3,500 B.P., a number of socioeconomic changes occurred (Wallace, 1955; McIntyre, 1990). These changes are associated with the period known as the Intermediate Horizon (3,500-1,500 B.P.) (Wallace, 1955). Increasing population size necessitated the intensified use of existing terrestrial and marine resources (Erlandson, 1994). This was accomplished in part through use of the circular shell fishhook on the coast and more abundant and diverse hunting equipment. The Intermediate Horizon marks a period in which specialization in labor emerged, trading networks became an Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.3-2 ESA / Of 30953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental &-fling, Impacts and Mitigation Measures — ......... 3.3 Cultural Resources increasingly important means by which both utilitarian and non -utilitarian materials were acquired, and travel routes were extended. Archaeological evidence suggests that the margins of rivers, marshes, and swamps within the Los Angeles River drainage, with their rich variety of resources, served as locations of prehistoric settlement and travel during this period (Altschul et al., 2003). The Late Prehistoric Period, spanning from approximately 1,500 years B.P. to the Spanish mission era, witnessed an increase in terrestrial and sea mammal hunting, along with continued seed collecting (Wallace, 1955). Small projectile points indicate the use of the bow and arrow. Although the location of Late Period villages does not significantly change, the villages become larger in size and fewer in number (McIntyre, 1990). Inter -village and inter -regional trade increased, and there is evidence for the use of shell beads as a form of money in economic exchanges. Ethnographic Background Gabrielino-Tongva The region was traditionally occupied by the Takic-speaking Gabrielino-Tongva Indians. The term "Gabrielino' is a general term that refers to those Native Americans who were administered by the Spanish at the Mission San Gabriel Arcdngel. Many contemporary Gabrielino identify themselves by the name "Tongva." Prior to European colonization, the Gabrielino-Tongva occupied a diverse area that included: the watersheds of the Los Angeles, San Gabriel, and Santa Ana rivers; the Los Angeles basin; and the islands of San Clemente, San Nicolas, and Santa Catalina (Kroeber, 1925). The Gabrielino language, like the Tataviam language, was part of the Takic branch of the Uto-Aztecan language family. The Gabrielino-Tongva Indians were hunter -gatherers and lived in permanent communities located near the presence of a stable food supply. Community populations generally ranged from 50 to 100 inhabitants, although larger settlements may have existed. The Gabrielino-Tongva are estimated to have had a population numbering around 5,000 in the pre -contact period (Kroeber, 1925). Villages are reported to have been the most abundant in the San Fernando Valley, the Glendale Narrows area north of Downtown, and around the Los Angeles River drainage (Gumprecht, 2001). Subsistence consisted of hunting, fishing, and gathering. Small terrestrial game were hunted with deadfalls, rabbit drives, and by burning undergrowth, while larger game such as deer were hunted using bows and arrows. Fish were taken by hook and line, nets, traps, spears, and poison (Bean and Smith, 1978). The primary plant resources were the acorn, gathered in the fall and processed in mortars and pestles, and various seeds that were harvested in late spring and summer and ground with manos and metates. The seeds included chic and other sages, various grasses, and islay or holly -leafed cherry. Coming ashore on Santa Catalina Island in October of 1542, Juan Rodriguez Cabrillo was the first European to make contact with the Gabrielino-Tongva; the 1769 expedition of Gaspar de Portold also passed through Gabrielino-Tongva territory (Bean and Smith, 1978). Native .... ......... ...------ _�,... . ........... .... Baldwin Parc TOD Specific Plan Project 3.3-3 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3.Environmental Selding„ Inrlaacts and Mifignrinn Measures 3 3 Cultural Resources Americans suffered severe depopulation and their traditional culture was radically altered after Spanish contact. Nonetheless, Gabrielino-Tongva descendants still reside in the greater Los Angeles and Orange County areas and maintain an active interest in their heritage. Prehistoric Resource Sites The project site is located approximately two miles east of the San Gabriel River. However, Baldwin Park is not known to have contained any permanent settlements for the Gabrielino Indians (Pinheiro, 1999). In addition, the records search conducted by the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) identified no archaeological sites within the project site or within a 0.5 -mile radius of the project site (SCCIC, 20014). Existing Historic Resources There are two identified historic resources within the Specific Plan area, which are listed in Table 3.3-1, and described below. The Specific Plan area does not contain any National Register or locally listed historic resources. To be considered a locally historic property, the building must be reviewed by the Baldwin Park Historic Resource Advisory Committee which makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council will therefore, determine if the resources identified here as potentially historic are significant at a local level. There are, however, numerous residential and commercial buildings that are older than 50 years located within the Specific Plan area that have not been comprehensively surveyed and evaluated. Therefore, it is possible that other potentially eligible historic resources exist within the Specific Plan area that could have significant associations with important events, people, or have high architectural merit. TABLE 3.3-1 HISTORIC RESOURCES WITHIN THE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA P -Number Date Property (P-19-) Recorded Register Status Baldwin Park City Hall 167222 1978 Listed on CRHP; 14403 Pacific Ave Eligible for NR Central School Auditorium n/a 14447 Pacific Avenue CRHP: California Register Historic Place NR: National Register Baldwin Park City Hall 1988 Eligible for CRHP and NR The Baldwin Park City Hall is listed on the California Register of Historic Resources and is determined eligible for listing on the National Register. The Baldwin Park City Hall was constructed in 1910, remodeled in 1958, and again in 1972. The building once served as a school (Central School) and was taken over for civic purposes in March 1958 shortly after the City's incorporation. The building is one-story resting on a high brick wall basement. It appears that the building was built in two sections; an addition to the north occurring later. However, no original Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.3-4 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitlga'l(k)n Measures ---- 1 t f, ultur;al Resources drawings of the structure exist, and the name of the architect and/or builder is unknown. The building was remodeled in 1958, and again in 1972, which altered the original arrangement of the old Central School (Koeper 1978). Although the building has been substantially altered, it is listed on the California Register of Historic Resources and is determined eligible for listing on the National Register. Central School Auditorium The Central School Auditorium is eligible for listing on the National Register, as well as the California Register Historic Places, not only for its architectural significance as a good example of Art Deco architecture, but also for its associations with an important historic event; the federal Works Progress Administration (WPA), established during the depression to provide jobs. Built in 1936, the architect is a local (Los Angeles) architect who also designed USC's Doheny Memorial Library, the interior of St. Vincent de Paul Church, and the Pacific Stock Exchange Building. Originally part of Baldwin Park Central School, the school was later relocated in the 1950s and the auditorium was sold. It became the temporary home for City Council meetings until City Hall was completed in 1978. In 2004, the City was awarded $2.4 million to rehabilitate the building as an Arts and Recreation Center (ARC). This building, because of its architecture and historic association with the WPA, appears eligible for listing in the National Register, as well as the state register. The recent alternations to the structure appear compatible with the original style of the building and do not detract from its historical or architectural significance. This building is a two-story, concrete auditorium structure designed in the Art Deco style of architecture, with a rectangular plan, a flat roof, painted concrete walls, and fluted pilasters. Decorative chevron -shaped banding is located above the former entry doors and two large concrete pillars with tiled caps are located to either side of the central doorway. The cornice line is decorated with recessed niches containing painted metal chevrons. Two two-story additions are located on the north fagade and one on the east fagade. These consist primarily of a concrete elevator tower with external glass and metal stairway, and a large, concrete -clad addition to the east with diagonal scoring. The primary entrance has been relocated to the north fagade and consists of two modern, all -glass double doors. The interior has been completely remodeled and the exterior restored. The building is now the Arts and Recreation Center and includes a dance studio, arts and crafts studio, exhibit gallery, small indoor amphitheater, and outdoor nature and picnic area. In addition, several properties located within the Specific Plan area are of historic -age. The properties within the Specific Plan area that have been reviewed for potential resources are described below Table 3.3-2. TABLE 3.3-2 PROPERTIES REVIEWED FOR POTENTIAL HISTORIC RESOURCES IN THE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA Year Building Name Building Location Constructed Commercial Building 14330 Ramona Blvd Unknown Knolls Pharmacy/Post Office Building 14300 Ramona Boulevard 1925 Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.3-5 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3 Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3.3 Cultural Resources Morgan Park Northeast corner of Ramona Boulevard and Baldwin Park Boulevard Old Bank Building Chamber of Commerce Building Former Red Car Charging Station CRHL: California Registered Historical Landmark. NR: National Register 14362 Ramona Boulevard 14327 Ramona Boulevard Off Badillo Street (near the Metrolink station) 1931 Circa 1926 1928 Unknown SOURCE: Record search results, City permit records; The Heritage of Baldwin Park (Pinheiro, 1981, 1999); ESA survey. Commercial Building/14330 Ramona Boulevard A historic -age structure located at 14330 Ramona Boulevard that is currently being used as a chiropractors office is listed in the Historic Property Data File for Los Angeles County, where it is identified as ineligible for listing on the National Register. Knolls Pharmacy/Post Office building The property at 14300 Ramona Boulevard (Knolls Pharmacy/Post Office) is a one- and two-story commercial building with an irregular (truncated "V") shaped plan, with wall surfaces clad in both light- and dark -colored common bond brick with decorative brick pilasters and brick soldier courses running horizontally between the first and second floor levels, and along the second floor cornice level. Arched brick window headers with decorative brick transoms in a checkerboard pattern are evident above all second floor windows. Constructed in 1925 on a prominent corner lot at the intersection of Ramona Boulevard and Sterling Drive, it is a typical example of early twentieth century brick commercial architecture. The irregular V-shaped plan of the building which emphasized its corner location is indicative of the commercial and architectural importance of this building, as Baldwin Park grew from a largely agricultural outpost to a burgeoning streetcar suburb of Los Angeles. A 1950s vintage sign on the rear of the building indicates that at one point it was a Rexall drugstore before becoming Knoll's Pharmacy, which operates the building today. The interior of the building also contains a newer U.S. Post Office kiosk. While the Pharmacy building is over 80 years old, it is not associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of history; it is not architecturally significant, is not associated with significant historic events of persons, and is not likely to yield important information. The building does not appear to be individually eligible for listing in the National Register or state register. In addition, the building has not been designated as a local resource under the City's ordinance. Morgan Park Morgan Park appears ineligible for listing on federal or state registers. Established in the early 1930s, Morgan Park first included a plunge pool, pool house, and office. The park was heavily modified in the late twentieth century, and contains numerous structures and landscape elements that appear to have been constructed in the last 20 to 30 years, including a senior center and community center, which replaced the earlier pools and pool house. During that time, Morgan Park also expanded to the east, resulting in removal of residences. Due to these later additions, alterations, and expansions, the Park no longer appears as an early twentieth century suburban BaI.d_.,....... win Park T 11 OD Specific Plan Project 3.3-6 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3 Environmental cBh�3 i ttpawds and Mdigatio n Measures . . m,m® 3.9 Cultural Resources recreational park and is not a historic resource. Furthermore, Morgan Park is not associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of history; it is not architecturally significant, is not associated with significant historic events of persons, and is not likely to yield important information. Old Bank Building The Old Bank Building is located on the southwest corner of Ramona and Maine. The structure does not appear to meet federal or state qualifications for listing. The building has been dated to at least pre -1945, with a probable construction date of 1926. The building is a commercial structure with a combination of Classical and Neoclassical design elements. The Old Bank building is a flat roofed, two-story structure, built of stone square blocks with simple massing, symmetrically designed, with some formal elements. It's most notable element consists of a detailed repetitive decorative frieze -like banding on the eaves, also above the windows and side entrance. The building has a series of large rectangular windows and side entry on the east side, with a second series of large square sectional windows on the second floor. The windows have added awnings on the first floor. The front of the building has a tall arched facade at the entrance with rectangular frame made of wedged stone that reaches to the top of the first floor. The arched entry has an added inset arched awning. The structure is currently used as a Health Center (Centro de Salud) with doctor's offices. Prior to its use as a medical building, it was the location of an appliance store (Modern Appliance). At least three banks have been located at the site including Crocker Bank —1971, Citizen's National Bank -1961, and the Bank of America — 1947.1 The one reference found for the possible construction date of the building appears in Pinheiro (1981) which states that in 1926 "The First National Bank moved across the tracks to their new two-story building on the southwest corner of El Monte Boulevard (Ramona Boulevard) and Maine Avenue." A panoramic photo at the Baldwin Park Historic society shows the building has had minor modifications including the addition of the awnings and additional glazing (an outer pane addition for climate control) over some of the first floor windows, with the original glazing transparent through the added panes on the second floor. The front entrance has also changed with the addition of modern doors, and the massive awning. As described above, records were not available to determine the name of the architect or specific date of construction prior to 1945. Although the structure retains much of its original architectural elements, and has had few modifications, the building does not appear to meet federal or state criteria based on association, or exceptional architectural uniqueness. The building has not been designated as a local resource under the City's ordinance. Furthermore, the building is not associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of history; it is not architecturally significant, is not associated with significant historic events of persons, and is not likely to yield important information. 1 Permit research conducted by Amy Harbin, Balwin Park City Planner. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.3-7 ESA ! D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3, Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures .-...... -------- 1111- - 33 Cultural Resources Chamber of Commerce Building The Chamber of Commerce Building is a one-story commercial building with a rectangular plan and a hip roof clad in red asphalt shingle with exposed eaves and decorative rafter tails, designed in a whimsical, storybook version of the Spanish Revival style of architecture. The property was built for the Baldwin Park Chamber of Commerce in 1928. The Chamber was established in 1906 to facilitate and to enhance the civic and economic development of the area, and was incorporated in 1925. According to the Heritage of Baldwin Park, "it is one of the few historical buildings left in Baldwin Park. Women were allowed to join the Chamber of Commerce seven years before the 19th Amendment was ratified." According to this history of Baldwin Park, the site was purchased in 1926 by Chamber members, and was built by local citizens who donated their time and labor to construct the building, as was common during that time. Chamber of Commerce members came to witness the event (and likely many of those who would help to construct the building). This building now includes replacement windows, and an addition to the rear of the building that occurred in 1970 which nearly doubled the size of the building. This building is not architecturally significant and its historic interest is primarily its former use as a Chamber of Commerce facility. It is not associated with significant historic events or persons, and it does not appear eligible for the National Register or state register. The building has not been designated as a local resource under the City's ordinance. The building is no longer used by the Chamber of Commerce and is currently vacant. Former Red Car Charging Station The industrial building off Badillo Street (near the Metrolink station), is ineligible for listing on federal, state, or local registers, primarily due to its impaired physical integrity, which has occurred either to the buildings or grounds, or to their immediate setting. The industrial building is a former electrical substation (automatic 1200 volt) owned and operated by Pacific Electric Railroad, which ran its Red Car Line down the center of Ramona Boulevard. At one time the building's environs consisted of a large rail yard and spurs, reserved for rail car maintenance and repair. All of the former rails and maintenance facilities are now gone. Because no permits for this building are available, it was likely built and designed by the railroad, using its own employees. This building, with brick walls, and large window openings with arched brick headers, concrete sills, and wood frames, is missing some of the circular steel vents that projected from the roof. Although some electrical hardware remains in the building, the building is in poor condition — with missing mortar, deteriorated brick and missing windows and doors. It is one of 50 known substations that existed throughout the Los Angeles area. Because of its highly altered setting, and the building's condition, this building does not appear to be eligible to listing at the federal or state level. The building has not been designated as a local resource under the City's ordinance. . 0 •. •. •. * A paleontological records search was conducted by Dr. Sam McCleod, vertebrate paleontologist at the Natural History Museum (NHM) of Los Angeles County. Based on the results, no vertebrate fossil localities are within the Specific Plan area. Surface deposits within the Specific Plan area consist of younger Quaternary Alluvium, derived as deposits from the San Gabriel Mountains to the north and San Gabriel River. These deposits are unlikely to contain significant Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.3-8 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 .. 9 - , .. _� sures Setting, k1nl ax as a 3 3 C�uliurW Res _.. s a4ona e m.,, ®..., 3 Environmental � �rtrrr:as fossils (McLeod, 2007 and 2014). Older Quaternary fluvial deposits, that may contain significant vertebrate fossils, may lie below this Quaternary Alluvium. The closest fossil locality in somewhat similar older Quaternary deposits is LACM 1728 located southeast of the Specific Plan area. This locality contained fossil specimens of horse, Equus, and camel, Camelops, at a depth of 15-20 feet below the surface. The paleontological sensitivity of the Specific Plan area is considered "moderate." 3.3.2 Regulatory Setting Federal, state, and local governments have developed laws and regulations designed to protect significant cultural resources that may be affected by actions that they undertake or regulate. The National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and CEQA are the primary federal and state laws governing preservation of historic and archaeological resources of national, regional, state and local significance. Federal National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 Enacted in 1966, the NHPA declared a national policy of historic preservation and instituted a multifaceted program, administered by the Secretary of the Interior, to encourage the achievement of preservation goals at the federal, state, and local levels. Section 106 of the NHPA states that federal agencies with direct or indirect jurisdiction over federally funded, assisted, or licensed undertakings must take into account the effect of the undertaking on any historic property that is included in, or eligible for inclusion in, the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) and that the ACHP must be afforded an opportunity to comment. The steps of the Section 106 process are accomplished through consultation with the SHPO, federally -recognized Indian tribes, local governments, and other interested parties. The goal of consultation is to identify potentially affected historic properties, assess effects to such properties, and seek ways to avoid, minimize, or mitigate any adverse effects on such properties. National Register of Historic Places The NRNP was established by the NHPA of 1966, as "an authoritative guide to be used by federal, state, and local governments, private groups and citizens to identify the Nation's historic resources and to indicate what properties should be considered for protection from destruction or impairment" (Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] 36 Section 60.2). The NRHP recognizes both historical -period and prehistoric archaeological properties that are significant at the national, state, and local levels. To be eligible for listing in the NRNP, a resource must be significant in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, or culture. Districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects of potential significance must meet one or more of the following four established criteria (U.S. Department of the Interior, 1995): A. Are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; B.aldwin Park TOD specific Flan Project 3.3-9 ESA ! D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3 3 Cultural Resources B. Are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; C. Embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or D. Have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Unless the property possesses exceptional significance, it must be at least 50 years old to be eligible for NRHP listing (U.S. Department of the Interior, 1995). In addition to meeting the criteria of significance, a property must have integrity. Integrity is defined as "the ability of a property to convey its significance" (U.S. Department of the Interior, 1995). The NRHP recognizes seven qualities that, in various combinations, define integrity: location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. To retain historic integrity a property must possess several, and usually most, of these seven aspects. Thus, the retention of the specific aspects of integrity is paramount for a property to convey its significance. State California Register of Historical Resources Under the California Public Resources Code, Section 5024.19(a), the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) was created in 1992 and implemented in 1998 as "an authoritative guide in California to be used by state and local agencies, private groups, and citizens to identify the state's historical resources and to indicate what properties are to be protected, to the extent prudent and feasible, from substantial adverse change." Certain properties, including those listed in or formally determined eligible for listing in the NRHP and California Historical Landmarks numbered 770 and higher, are automatically included in the CRHR. Other properties recognized under the California Points of Historical Interest program, identified as significant in historical resources surveys or designated by local landmarks programs, may be nominated for inclusion in the CRHR. A resource, either an individual property or a contributor to a historic district, may be listed in the CRHR if the State Historical Resources Commission determines that it meets one or more of the following criteria, which are modeled on NRHP criteria: • Criterion 1. It is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California's history and cultural heritage. • Criterion 2. It is associated with the lives of persons important in our past. • Criterion 3. It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction; represents the work of an important creative individual; or possesses high artistic values. • Criterion 4. It has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in history or prehistory. Furthermore, under PRC 5024.1, Title 14 CCR, Section 4852(c), a cultural resource must retain integrity to be considered eligible for the CRHR. Specifically, it must retain sufficient character Baldwin Park TOO SpeciFlc Plan Project 3.3-10 ESA I D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Selling, lrnpacA and Mtttgatluu Measures 31, Cultural Resources or appearance to be recognizable as a historical resource and convey reasons of significance. Integrity is evaluated with regard to retention of such factors as location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. California Historical Landmarks California Historical Landmarks (CHLs) are buildings, structures, sites, or places that have anthropological, cultural, military, political, architectural, economic, scientific or technical, religious, experimental, or other value and that have been determined to have statewide historical significance by meeting at least one of the criteria listed below. The resource also must be approved for designation by the County Board of Supervisors (or the city or town council in whose jurisdiction it is located); be recommended by the State Historical Resources Commission; and be officially designated by the Director of California State Parks. The specific standards now in use were first applied in the designation of CHL #770. CHLs #770 and above are automatically listed in the CRHR. To be eligible for designation as a landmark, a resource must meet at least one of the following criteria: • It is the first, last, only, or most significant of its type in the state or within a large geographic region (northern, central, or southern California); • It is associated with an individual or group having a profound influence on the history of California; or • It is a prototype of, or an outstanding example of, a period, style, architectural movement or construction or is one of the more notable works or the best surviving work in a region of a pioneer architect, designer, or master builder. California Points of Historical Interest California Points of Historical Interest (PHI) are sites, buildings, features, or events that are of local (city or county) significance and have anthropological, cultural, military, political, architectural, economic, scientific or technical, religious, experimental, or other value. PHI designated after December 1997 and recommended by the SHRC are also listed in the CRHR. No historic resource may be designated as both a landmark and a point. If a point is later granted status as a landmark, the point designation will be retired. In practice, the point designation program is most often used in localities that do not have a locally enacted cultural heritage or preservation ordinance. To be eligible for designation as a PHI, a resource must meet at least one of the following criteria: • It is the first, last, only, or most significant of its type within the local geographic region (city or county); • It is associated with an individual or group having a profound influence on the history of the local area; or Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.3-11 ESA I D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3,3 Cultural Resources It is a prototype of, or an outstanding example of, a period, style, architectural movement or construction or is one of the more notable works or the best surviving work in the local region of a pioneer architect, designer, or master builder. California Environmental Quality Act CEQA is the principal statute governing environmental review of projects occurring in the state and is codified at PRC Section 21000 et seq. CEQA requires lead agencies to determine if a Project would have a significant effect on the environment, including significant effects on historical or archaeological resources. Under CEQA (Section 21084. 1), a project that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment. The CEQA Guidelines (Title 14 California Code of Regulations [CCR] Section 15064.4) recognize that an historical resource includes: (1) a resource listed in, or determined to be eligible by the State Historical Resources Commission, for listing in the CRHR; (2) a resource included in a local register of historical resources, as defined in PRC Section 5020.1(k) or identified as significant in a historical resource survey meeting the requirements of PRC Section 5024.1(g); and (3) any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript which a lead agency determines to be historically significant or significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California by the lead agency, provided the lead agency's determination is supported by substantial evidence in light of the whole record. The fact that a resource does not meet the three criteria outlined above does not preclude the lead agency from determining that the resource may be an historical resource as defined in PRC Sections 5020.10) or 5024.1. If a lead agency determines that an archaeological site is a historical resource, the provisions of Section 21084.1 of CEQA and Section 15064.4 of the CEQA Guidelines apply. If a project may cause a substantial adverse change (defined as physical demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration of the resource or its immediate surroundings such that the significance of an historical resource would be materially impaired) in the significance of an historical resource, the lead agency must identify potentially feasible measures to mitigate these effects (CEQA Guidelines Sections 15064.4(b)(1), 15064.4(b)(4)). If an archaeological site does not meet the historical resource criteria contained in the CEQA Guidelines, then the site may be treated in accordance with the provisions of Section 21083, which is a unique archaeological resource. As defined in Section 21083.2 of CEQA a "unique" archaeological resource is an archaeological artifact, object, or site, for which it can be clearly demonstrated that without merely adding to the current body of knowledge, there is a high probability that it meets any of the following criteria: • Contains information needed to answer important scientific research questions and there is a demonstrable public interest in that information; • Has a special and particular quality such as being the oldest of its type or the best available example of its type; or, Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.3-12 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures ......... .... ...... 3,3 Cultural Resources • Is directly associated with a scientifically recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person. If an archaeological site meets the criteria for a unique archaeological resource as defined in Section 21083.2, then the site is to be treated in accordance with the provisions of Section 21083.2, which state that if the lead agency determines that a project would have a significant effect on unique archaeological resources, the lead agency may require reasonable efforts be made to permit any or all of these resources to be preserved in place (Section 21083.1(a)). If preservation in place is not feasible, mitigation measures shall be required. The CEQA Guidelines note that if an archaeological resource is neither a unique archaeological nor a historical resource, the effects of the project on those resources shall not be considered a significant effect on the environment (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.4(c)(4)). Senate Bill 18 Senate Bill 18 (SB 18), which went into effect January 1, 2005, requires local governments (city and county) to consult with Native American tribes before making certain planning decisions and to provide notice to tribes at certain key points in the planning process. The intent is to "provide California Native American tribes an opportunity to participate in local land use decisions at an early planning stage, for the purpose of protecting, or mitigating impacts to, cultural places" (Governor's Office of Planning and Research, 2005). The purpose of involving tribes at these early planning stages is to allow consideration of cultural places in the context of broad local land use policy, before individual site-specific, project -level, land use designations are made by a local government. The consultation requirements of SB 18 apply to general plan or specific plan processes proposed on or after March 1, 2005. According to the Tribal Consultation Guidelines: Supplement to General Plan Guidelines (OPR, 2005), the following are the contact and notification responsibilities of local governments: • Prior to the adoption or any amendment of a general plan or specific plan, a local government must notify the appropriate tribes (on the contact list maintained by the Native American Heritage Commission [NAHC]) of the opportunity to conduct consultations for the purpose of preserving, or mitigating impacts to, cultural places located on land within the local government's jurisdiction that is affected by the proposed plan adoption or amendment. Tribes have 90 days from the date on which they receive notification to request consultation, unless a shorter timeframe has been agreed to by the tribe (Government Code Section 65352.3). • Prior to the adoption or substantial amendment of a general plan or specific plan, a local government must refer the proposed action to those tribes that are on the NAHC contact list and have traditional lands located within the city or county's jurisdiction. The referral must allow a 45 -day comment period (Government Code Section 65352). Notice must be sent regardless of whether prior consultation has taken place. Such notice does not initiate a new consultation process. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.3-13 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3.3 Cultural Resources Local government must send a notice of a public hearing, at least 10 days prior to the hearing, to tribes who have filed a written request for such notice (Government Code Section 65092). If a project involves the adoption or substantial amendment of a general plan or specific plan, the provisions of Senate Bill 18 may apply. Local Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan The City of Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan's Open Space and Conservation Element contains the following policies regarding historic and cultural resources within the city: Policy 8.1 Implement the provisions contained in the City's Historic Resources Code to protect historically significant structures. Policy 8.2 Encourage restoration of historic structures. Historic Resources Code Sections 153.285 through 153.308 of the City of Baldwin Park's Zoning Code comprise the Historic Resources Code, which was established for the purpose of: • Safeguarding the heritage of the city by protecting designated buildings and structures that reflect the city's cultural history; • Encouraging public understanding of the unique heritage of the city; • Strengthening civic pride in the beauty and notable accomplishments of the past; • Protecting and enhancing the city's attractions to residents and visitors and supporting and stimulating business and industry; • Promoting the use of historic buildings, structures and historic districts; and • Protecting and safeguarding the property rights of the owners whose property is declared to be a historic building or structure or is located in an area designated as a historic district. The Historic Resources Code established a Historic Resource Advisory Committee, which is charged with various responsibilities including overseeing an ongoing historic resources survey, recommending designation of historic resources to the City Council, protecting historic resources, and promoting public understanding of historic resources. In addition, the Code created a Local Official Register of Historic Resources and sets forth the criteria for designating historic structures (Section 153.291) and the process for adoption of a historic resource. To date, no buildings or structures in Baldwin Park have been designated as an historic resource by the Committee. Under the Municipal Code, the sole discretion to determine whether a building should be designated as a local landmark is vested in the Baldwin Park City Council (Section 153.295). Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.3-14 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mi1jg2adkln Measures .. ._ .... _ 3.3 Cultural Resources Baldwin Park's Historic Resources Code (Section 153.291) sets forth the following criteria for the Council to evaluate: (A) The building or structure proposed for designation is particularly representative of a distinct historical period, type, style, region or way of life. (B) The building or structure was connected with someone renown, important, or a local personality. (C) The building or structure is connected with a business or use which was once common but is now rare. (D) The building or structure represents the work of a master builder, engineer, designer, artist or architect whose individual genius influenced his age. (E) The building or structure is the site of an important historic event or is associated with events that have made a meaningful contribution to the nation, state or city. (F) The building or structure exemplifies a particular architectural style. (G) The building or structure exemplifies the best remaining architectural type of a neighborhood. (H) The construction materials or engineering methods used in the building or structure embody elements of outstanding attention to architectural or engineering design, detail, material or craftsmanship. State Paleontological resources are also afforded protection by CEQA. Appendix G (Part V) of the CEQA Guidelines provides guidance relative to significant impacts on paleontological resources, stating that a project will normally result in a significant impact on the environment if it will "...disrupt or adversely affect a paleontologic resource or site or unique geologic feature, except as part of a scientific study." Section 5097.5 of the Public Resources Code specifies that any unauthorized removal of paleontological remains is a misdemeanor. Further, the California Penal Code Section 622.5 sets the penalties for the damage or removal of paleontological resources. Professional Standards The Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (SVP) has established standard guidelines for acceptable professional practices in the conduct of paleontological resource assessments and surveys, monitoring and mitigation, data and fossil recovery, sampling procedures, and specimen preparation, identification, analysis, and curation. Most practicing professional paleontologists in the nation adhere closely to the SVP's assessment, mitigation, and monitoring requirements as specifically provided in its standard guidelines. Most state regulatory agencies accept the SVP standard guidelines as a measure of professional practice. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.3-15 ESA I D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3 EImpacts Setting, Im acts and Mitigation Measures . ,.,._— --- 3 3 Cultural Resources • • • In accordance with Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, the project could have a significant impact on cultural resources if it would result in any of the following: • Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5; • Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5; • Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature; or • Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries. CEQA provides that a project may cause a significant environmental effect where the project could result in a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource (Public Resources Code, Section 21084.1). CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5 defines a "substantial adverse change" in the significance of a historical resource to mean physical demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration of the resource or its immediate surroundings such that the significance of a historical resource would be "materially impaired" (CEQA Guidelines, Section 15064.5[b][1]). CEQA Guidelines, Section 15064.5(b)(2), defines "materially impaired" for purposes of the definition of "substantial adverse change" as follows: The significance of a historical resource is materially impaired when a project: • Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics of an historical resource that convey its historical significance and that justify its inclusion in, or eligibility for, inclusion in the California Register; or • Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics that account for its inclusion in a local register of historical resources pursuant to Section 5020.1(k) of the Public Resources Code or its identification in an historical resources survey meeting the requirements of Section 5024.1(g) of the Public Resources Code, unless the public agency reviewing the effects of the project establishes by a preponderance of evidence that the resource is not historically or culturally significant; or • Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics of a historical resource that convey its historical significance and that justify its eligibility for inclusion in the California Register as determined by a lead agency for purposes of CEQA. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(b)(3), a project that follows the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring, and Reconstructing Historic Buildings or Standards for Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.3-16 ESA / D1 30953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3, Environmental S'rc�rtlmg, ln,ipa is and Miligatdon Measures .m� .... 3.3 Cultural Resources Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings is considered to have mitigated impacts to historic resources to a less -than -significant level. Historic resources are usually 50 years old or older and must meet at least one of the criteria for listing in the California Register (such as association with historical events, important people, or architectural significance), in addition to maintaining a sufficient level of physical integrity (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5[a][3]). Records Search and Historic Map and Aerials Review To evaluate the project's potential effects on significant cultural resources, including prehistoric and historic archaeological sites, a project -specific cultural resources literature and records search was conducted by the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCOC) at California State University, Fullerton, which reviewed the State of California Office of Historic Preservation records, base maps, historic maps, and literature for Los Angeles County on file. The records search included an examination of previous cultural resources survey coverage, studies, and known cultural resources within a 0.5 -mile radius of the project area. Historic maps and aerial photographs were also examined. The search included a review of the National Register of Historic Places (NRNP), the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR), the California Points of Historical Interest list (CPHI), the California Historical Landmarks (CHL) list, the Archaeological Determination of Eligibility list (ADOE), and the California State Historic Resources Inventory list. The results of the records search indicated that nine previous cultural resources studies have been conducted within 0.5 -mile of the Specific Plan area, including seven studies that included portions of the Specific Plan area. These studies are listed in Table 3.3-3. Two cultural resources within the Specific Plan area were identified by the previous cultural resources studies. These resources include the Baldwin Park City Hall (p-19-167222), which is on the California Register of Historic Resources and is determined eligible for listing on the National Register; and the Central School Auditorium, which determined to be eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. TABLE 3.3-3 CULTURAL RESOURCES STUDIES CONDUCTED WITHIN THE PLANNING AREA SCCIC Report No. Author Yea r Study LA -02782 Boxt, Matthew A. 199 A Cultural Resource Assessment of the Three 2 Potential Treatment Plant Sites within the Cities of Irwindale, Baldwin Park, and West Covina, Los Angeles County, California LA003101 White, William G. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project Draft Environmental Impact Report 199 Cultural Resource Investigation of Eight 4 Monitoring Well Locations for the San Gabriel Basin Demonstration Project, Los Angeles County, California. 3.3-17 ESA t D130953 April 2015 3EI'llMitigation_ ........ Measures . Environmental Setting nt I..... and M 3 3 Cultural Resources SCCIC Report Yea No. Author r Study LA -03824 Anonymous 199 Cultural Resources Report for the Baldwin Park Prepared by Greenwood and 5 Operable Unit Water Delivery Plan Associates LA -06111 Duke, Curt 200 Cultural Resource Assessment Cingular Wireless 3 Facility No. Vy 218-04 Baldwin Park, Los Angeles County, California. LA -07244 Bonner, Wayne H. 200 Records Search Results for Cingular Wireless 2 Site Vy-218-03 (Baldwin Park Blvd., Baldwin Pat°k, Los Angeles County, California. LAI 0641 Tang, Bai "Tom" 201 l"relminary HlstoricaldArohat olog'ical Resources 0 Study„ Sari Bernardino Line Posttive Tt°aln Control P'r'oject„ Souttreu"n California Regional Rail Auftilority, Counties of Los Angeles and San Bernardino LA -12566 Hunt, Kevin and Robert Ramirez 201 City of Baldwin Park, Baldwin Park Transit Center 3 Apartments Project Cultural Resources Study Native American Sacred Lands File Search A Sacred Lands Files (SLF) records search for the Specific Plan area was requested from the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) on November 14, 2014. The NAHC issued a response on November 21, 2014, which stated that the record search of the SLF failed to indicate the presence of Native American cultural resources within the Specific Plan area or immediate vicinity. The NAHC results also noted, however, that the "absence of specific site information in the sacred lands file does not indicate the absence of cultural resources in any project area." A list of nine Native American tribal members who may have additional knowledge of the project was included with the NAHC results. Letters were sent to these tribal members on December 29, 2014 describing the proposed project and map indicating the Specific Plan area. Recipients were invited to reply with any information they are able to share about Native American resources that might be affected by the proposed project. No responses were received from any of the tribes. Paleontological Records Search For paleontological resources, a project -specific paleontological resources records search was conducted by the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County in October 2007 and in December 2014 by Dr. Sam McLeod, an NHM paleontologist. In addition to the records searches, the City's General Plan was reviewed to identify any cultural resources not included in the records search. 3.3.5 Impact Analysis Impact 3.3.1: The proposed project could cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resources as defined in Section15064.5. As described above, two historic resources have been identified within the Specific Plan area. These resources include the Baldwin Park City Hall, which is on the California Register of ,._..... m..,....... .... Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.3-18 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures ......... mm _.,, ......... --.... ........ �.m,. __...... .... .. 3.3 Cultural Resources Historic Resources and is determined eligible for listing on the National Register; and the Central School Auditorium, which determined to be eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. The Specific Plan would not result in changes to either historic resource in the City. The City Hall would not be modified by the proposed Specific Plan. The City Hall has not been identified as an underutilized parcel that would be redeveloped to provide housing or retail uses. No physical changes to the City Hall building would occur by implementation of the proposed Specific Plan. The Specific Plan does include development of a new Arts Park to be located on the across from City Hall. The new Arts Park would provide a location for civic and community functions, and create a museum without walls for performance art, sculpture, and temporary two-dimensional art displays. The Arts Park would include open space, street furniture, landscaping, public art, a water feature, small performance space, and concessions. The new uses would be consistent with the historic civic and public uses of the City Hall building, and would not a result in an adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. As a result, the project would not result in an indirect impact on the City Hall historic resource. As described above, the Central School Auditorium was renovated and is now the Arts and Recreation Center and includes a dance studio, arts and crafts studio, exhibit gallery, small indoor amphitheater, and outdoor nature and picnic area. This building would not be renovated by the proposed Specific Plan. However, the sidewalks adjacent to this building are proposed by the Specific Plan to be developed into an off-street walkway system that would provide pedestrian circulation between community facilities, the Metrolink Station, and within and between new mixed use and retail developments, greatly improving the pedestrian circulation in Downtown. The pedestrian circulation would be consistent with the historic and existing civic uses of the Arts and Recreation Center, and would be consistent with the existing adjacent City Hall and parking structure civic uses. As described above, the architectural guidelines and standards that are included in the Specific Plan are intended to encourage new development to respect the setting and character of the area. Thus, the proposed Specific Plan would not detract from the historic uses of this building and indirect impacts to this structure as a historic resource would not occur. As described above, no other historic resources have been identified in the Specific Plan area. Properties are historically aged but none that have been evaluated are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history nor likely to yield information important in prehistory or history. In addition, none of the properties embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction or represent the work of a master, or possess high artistic values, nor likely to yield information important to the prehistory or history of the local areas, California, or the nation. As a result, demolition or renovation of the buildings listed in Table 3.3-2 would not result in the loss of significant historic resources. In addition to the historic buildings identified in this Section, numerous residential and commercial buildings that are older than 50 years are located within the Specific Plan area. As these structures have not been comprehensively surveyed and evaluated, it is possible that they Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.3-19 ESA! D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting. Impacts and Mitigation Measures 1-1 . .--...... --. —_. 11111-- 3.3 Cultural Resources may be eligible as historic resources if other criteria apply, such as significant associations with important events, people, or have high architectural merit. To avoid potential impacts to unidentified historic resources, or properties that could become historic resources as they age during the 20 -year implementation period of the Specific Plan, the proposed Specific Plan includes a policy to avoid impacts to historic buildings. This policy states that demolition of the resources or any building in the Specific Plan area that is 50 years old or older, unless it is demonstrated that it not a significant historic resource, shall be prohibited. In addition, any alteration of these buildings shall be done so in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring, and Reconstructing Historic Buildings or Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings. This policy would minimize this impact to a less -than -significant level. Mitigation Measure: No mitigation required. Significance After Mitigation: Less than significant. Impact 3.3.2: The proposed project could cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource: Impacts on cultural resources could result from ground -disturbing activities and/or damage, destruction, or alteration of historic structures. Ground -disturbing activities include project - related excavation, grading, trenching, vegetation clearance, the operation of heavy equipment, or other surface and sub -surface disturbance that could damage or destroy surficial or buried archaeological resources, including prehistoric and historic remains or human burials. The records search indicated that no prehistoric archaeological resources are located within the Specific Plan area or within 0.5 -mile of the area. The Specific Plan area is located in close proximity to the San Gabriel River and is generally an area well suited to human habitation and use. Based on the historic aerial and map review, the Specific Plan area has been heavily developed for a long period of time. The specific plan area was historically used for agricultural uses, commercial, residential and industrial uses over the last 100 years. Therefore, the likelihood of the discovery of unknown prehistoric archaeological resources is minimal. However, it is known that Gabrielinos traversed the project area and since the nature of the proposed project would involve ground -disturbing activities, it is possible that such actions could unearth, expose, or disturb unknown subsurface archaeological, and/or historical, or Native American resources. Inadvertent damage to significant buried archaeological deposits during construction would be a significant impact. Implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL -1 would reduce impacts to archaeological resources to less -than -significant levels. Measure CUL -1: During project -level construction, should subsurface archaeological resources be discovered, all activity in the vicinity of the find shall stop and a qualified archaeologist shall be contacted to assess the significance of the find according to CEQA --- Baldwin Park OD Specific Project ....... 3.3-20 ESA / D130953 Draft EnAronrnental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental ieUing, Irnp��acts and Mitigation Measures ... m„ �... t.3 Cultural ...,., ,. __..... Resources Guidelines Section 15064.5. Excavation or disturbance may continue in other areas of the project site that are not reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent or additional archaeological resources. If any find is determined to be significant, the archaeologist shall determine, in consultation with the implementing agency and any local Native American groups expressing interest, appropriate avoidance measures or other appropriate mitigation. Per CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.4(b)(3), preservation in place shall be the preferred means to avoid impacts to archaeological resources qualifying as historical resources. Consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.4(b)(3)(C), if it is demonstrated that resources cannot be avoided, the qualified archaeologist shall develop additional treatment measures, such as data recovery or other appropriate measures, in consultation with the implementing agency and any local Native American representatives expressing interest in prehistoric or tribal resources. If an archaeological site does not qualify as an historical resource but meets the criteria for a unique archaeological resource as defined in Section 21083.2, then the site shall be treated in accordance with the provisions of Section 21083.2. Significance After Mitigation: Less than significant. Impact 3.3.3: Implementation of the Specific Plan could directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature. Fossil remains are found in the geologic deposits (sedimentary rock formations) within which they were originally buried. A paleontologically important deposit is one that has a high probability of producing unique, scientifically important fossils. This is determined by the abundance and densities of fossil specimens and/or previously recorded fossil sites exposed in the deposit. Therefore, the potential paleontological sensitivity of the Project site can be assessed by identifying the paleontological importance of geologic deposits within the Specific Plan area. The Specific Plan area is underlain by younger Quaternary Alluvium, which is unlikely to contain vertebrate fossils. However, the younger Alluvium may be underlain by older Quaternary deposits that are known to contain vertebrate fossils. Fossils have been found within five miles of areas in similar deposits. Thus, the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County considers the Specific Plan area to have a moderate paleontological sensitivity. While shallow excavation or surface grading is unlikely to uncover paleontological resources, deeper excavation into older sediments may uncover significant fossils. Thus, any deep excavations in the Specific Plan area could result in impacts to paleontological resources. Paleontological resources represent a limited, non-renewable, and impact -sensitive scientific and educational resource. Paleontological resources include not only the actual fossil remains, but also the collecting localities, and the geologic formations containing those localities. If a paleontological resource is uncovered and inadvertently damaged, the impact to the resource could be substantial. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project could result in significant impacts to paleontological resources. As a result, Mitigation Measure CUL -2 has been included to reduce this potential impact to a less than significant level. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.3-21 ESA t D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3, Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures ._._ ...ee, „,,. ... 3 3 Cultural Resources Mitigation Measure CUL -2: In the event that paleontological resources are encountered during the course of project development, all construction activity must temporarily cease in the affected area(s) until the uncovered fossils are properly assessed by a qualified paleontologist and subsequent recommendations for appropriate documentation and conservation are evaluated by the Lead Agency. Excavation or disturbance may continue in other areas of the Specific Plan area that are not reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent or additional paleontological resources. Significance After Mitigation: Less than significant with mitigation incorporated. Impact 3.3.4: Implementation of the project could disturb human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries. There is no indication that any particular site in the Specific Plan area has been used for human burial purposes in the recent or distant past. Therefore, it is unlikely that human remains would be encountered during construction of the proposed project. However, in the unlikely event that human remains were discovered during project construction, the California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 requires that all activities cease immediately and the Coroner shall be contacted to evaluate the remains. Should the Coroner determine the human remains to be of Native American descent, the coroner has 24 hours to notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). The NAHC would then be required to contact the most likely descendant of the deceased Native American, who would then serve as consultant on how to proceed with the remains. Compliance with the established regulatory framework (i.e., California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 and Public Resources Code Section 5097.98) would reduce potential impacts involving disturbance to human remains to less than significant. Mitigation Measure: No mitigation required. Significance After Mitigation: Less than significant. The cumulative analysis for impacts on cultural and paleontological resources considers a broad regional area of which the resources are a part. The cumulative context for the cultural and paleontological resources analysis is Los Angeles County as a whole. As described previously, numerous residential and commercial buildings dating older than 50 years are located within the Specific Plan area; and the Specific Plan includes a policy that states that demolition of any building in the Specific Plan area that is 50 years old or older is prohibited, unless it is demonstrated that it is not a significant historic resource. Thus, implementation of this Specific Plan policy would ensure that significant historic resources are not destroyed. As a Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.3-22 ESA i D1 30963 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures ._. ........ ........ 3,3 Cultural Resources result, implementation of the Specific Plan would not contribute to cumulatively considerable historic resource impacts in the region. Also, as described previously, the Specific Plan area is not identified as an area with unique subsurface archaeological or paleontological resources. However, previously unknown and unrecorded resources could exist within the Specific Plan area, and could be unearthed during excavation and grading activities of both the proposed Specific Plan and cumulative projects. As a result, Mitigation Measure CUL -1 has been included to require that in event of an archaeological site being discovered during excavation or construction activities, the resource be avoided, not disturbed, or otherwise preserved by an archeologist in accordance with the requirements of CEQA. Additionally, Mitigation Measure CUL -2 states that in the event that paleontological resources are discovered all construction activity must temporarily cease in the affected area(s) until the uncovered fossils are properly assessed by a qualified paleontologist. Implementation of the Mitigation Measures, Specific Plan policies, and CEQA Guideline regulations would ensure that potential cumulative impacts from both the proposed Specific Plan and other cumulative projects to unknown archaeological and paleontological resources are less than cumulatively considerable. Mitigation Measures: Implement Mitigation Measures CUL -1 and CUL -2. Significance After Mitigation: Less than cumulatively considerable. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.3-23 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures _,.,,.. ......... �. 3 3 Cultural Resources Bean, Lowell John and Charles R. Smith, In California, edited by Robert F. Heizer, Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, William C. Sturtevant, General Editor, 1978. Benbow, Robert, Baldwin Park Historical Society, personal conversation with ESA staff, April 24, 2007. California Soil Resources Lab, The Online Soil Survey, (http://casoilresource.lawr.ucdavis.edu/gmap/), accessed December, 2014. City of Baldwin Park, Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan, November 20, 2002. Colver, Seth, The Historical Volume and Reference Works, Los Angeles County Historical Volume III, Baldwin Park's Early Years, 1964. County of Los Angeles Public Library, Community History, http://www.colapublib.org/history/lapuente, accessed December, 2014. Gumprecht, Blake, The Los Angeles River: Its Life, Death, and Possible Rebirth, 1999, Reprinted 2001. Hart, E.W., Fault -Rupture Hazard Zones in California: Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act of 1972 with Index to Earthquake Fault Zones, California Geological Survey (formerly known as California Division of Mines and Geology), Special Publication 42, 1990, revised and updated 1997. Historical Society of the City of Baldwin Park, The Heritage of Baldwin Park, Third Issue, 1984. Koeper, Frederick, National Register of Historic Places Inventory -Nomination Form, 1978. Native American Heritage Commission, letter to Environmental Science Associates, November 21, 2014. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, letter to Environmental Science Associates, October 4, 2007. Poretta, Phil, Application for Registration of Historical Landmark, The Mojave Road. Accessible at the SCCIC. Sanborn Maps, 1925 through 1928. South Central Coast Information Center, Records Search Results List and Maps to ESA, November 25, 2014 Pinheiro, Aileen, Heritage of Baldwin Park, Volume 1 (Baldwin Park Historical Society), 1981, Pinheiro, Aileen, Heritage of Baldwin Park, Volume 2, (Baldwin Park Historical Society), 1984. Pinheiro, Aileen, Heritage of Baldwin Park, Volume 3, (Baldwin Park Historical Society), 1999. ........ ,... _ .. -- —.. Baldwin Park T7D Specific Plan Project 3.3-24 ESA i ®130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, ln,ipact% and Mffi�;iation Measures . ......................... . . . ........... — 11 3 3 Coltural Resources The Civic Group, The California Mission Site, http://www.missionscalifomia.com/journeys/san- gabriel.html, 1998, accessed December, 2014. Weeks and Grimmer, Secretary of the Interior's Standardsfor the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring, and Reconstructing Historic Buildings, 1995. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.3-25 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 3.4 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Introduction This section provides a discussion of existing regulations related to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and addresses GHG impacts related to implementation of the proposed Specific Plan. The methods of analyzing emissions described in this section are consistent with the recommendations of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), as described below. 3.4.1 Environmental Setting Climate The proposed Specific Plan is located in the County of Los Angeles within the Basin, which has a distinctive climate determined by its terrain and geographic location. The general region lies in the semi-permanent high-pressure zone of the eastern Pacific, resulting in a mild climate tempered by cool sea breezes with light average wind speeds. The usually mild climate is interrupted occasionally by periods of extremely hot weather, winter storms, or Santa Ana winds. Climate Change Overview Gases that trap heat in the atmosphere are called GHGs. The major concern with GHGs is that increases in their concentrations are causing global climate change. Global climate change is a change in the average weather on Earth that can be measured by wind patterns, storms, precipitation, and temperature. Although there is disagreement as to the rate of global climate change and the extent of the impacts attributable to human activities, most in the scientific community agree that there is a direct link between increased emissions of GHGs and long term global temperature increases. The principal GHGs are carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CHA nitrous oxide (N20), sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs). Because different GHGs have different warming potential and CO2 is the most common reference gas for climate change, GHG emissions are often quantified and reported as CO2 equivalents (CO2e). For example, SF6 is a GHG commonly used in the utility industry as an insulating gas in circuit breakers and other electronic equipment. SF6, while comprising a small fraction of the total GHGs emitted annually world-wide, is a much more potent GHG with 22,800 times the global warming potential as CO2. Therefore, an emission of one metric ton (MT) of SF6 could be reported as an emission of 22,800 MT of CO2e. Large emission sources are reported in million metric tons (MMT) of CO2e.' Some of the potential effects in California of global warming may include loss in snow pack, sea level rise, more extreme heat days per year, more high ozone days, more forest fires, and more drought years (CARB, 2009). Globally, climate change has the potential to impact numerous 1 A metric ton is 1,000 kilograms; it is equal to approximately 1.1 U.S. tons and approximately 2,204.6 pounds. �......___...e ,,,,—----- ...................... ................. __.................................... ........ ........ Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.4-1 ESA ! ®130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures ....__ ......... 3,4 Greenhouse Gases environmental resources through potential, though uncertain, impacts related to future air temperatures and precipitation patterns. The projected effects of global warming on weather and climate are likely to vary regionally, but are expected to include the following direct effects (IPCC, 2001): • Higher maximum temperatures and more hot days over nearly all land areas; • Higher minimum temperatures, fewer cold days and frost days over nearly all land areas; • Reduced diurnal temperature range over most land areas; • Increase of heat index over land areas; and • More intense precipitation events. Also, there are many secondary effects that are projected to result from global warming, including global rise in sea level, impacts to agriculture, changes in disease vectors, and changes in habitat and biodiversity. While the possible outcomes and the feedback mechanisms involved are not fully understood and much research remains to be done, the potential for substantial environmental, social, and economic consequences over the long term may be great. California produced 459 gross MMTCO2e in 2012 (CARB, 2014x). Combustion of fossil fuel in the transportation sector was the single largest source of California's GHG emissions in 2012, accounting for 36 percent of total GHG emissions in the state (GARB, 2014a). This sector was followed by the electric power sector (including both in-state and out-of-state sources) (21 percent) and the industrial sector (19 percent) (CARB, 2014a). According to much of the scientific literature on this topic, emissions of GHGs contributing to global climate change are attributable in large part to human activities associated with the transportation, industrial/manufacturing, utility, residential, commercial, and agricultural sectors. In California, the transportation sector is the largest emitter of GHGs, followed by electricity generation (GARB, 2014x). Emissions of CO2 are byproducts of fossil fuel combustion. CH4, a highly potent GHG, results from off -gassing (the release of chemicals from nonmetallic substances under ambient or greater pressure conditions) and is largely associated with agricultural practices and landfills. N20 is also largely attributable to agricultural practices and soil management. CO2 sinks, or reservoirs, include vegetation and the ocean, which absorb CO2 through sequestration and dissolution, respectively, and are two of the'most common processes of CO2 sequestration. The federal CAA requires the USEPA to define national ambient air quality standards to protect public health and welfare in the U.S. The CAA does not specifically regulate GHG emissions; however, on April 2, 2007 the U.S. Supreme Court in Massachusetts v. U.S. Environmental Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.4-2 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3, Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures r� „e..._ ,..., _ ........ — 3 4 Greenhouse Gases Protection Agency, determined that GHGs are pollutants that can be regulated under the CAA. Currently, there are no federal regulations that establish ambient air quality standards for GHGs. The USEPA Administrator determined that atmospheric concentrations of GHGs endanger the public health and welfare within the meaning of Section 202(a) of the CAA. The evidence supporting this finding consists of human activity resulting in "high atmospheric levels" of GHG emissions, which are likely responsible for increases in average temperatures and other climatic changes. Furthermore, the observed and projected results of climate change (e.g., higher likelihood of heat waves, wild fires, droughts, sea level rise, and higher intensity storms) are a threat to the public health and welfare. Therefore, GHGs were found to endanger the public health and welfare of current and future generations. The USEPA also recently released a proposed rule which would regulate GHG emissions from existing power plants across the nation. The proposed rule establishes state -by -state 2030 GHG goals. State The California Air Resources Board (CARB) is the agency responsible for coordination and oversight of state and local air pollution control programs in California. Various statewide and local initiatives to reduce the state's contribution to GHG emissions have raised awareness that, even though the various contributors to and consequences of global climate change are not yet fully understood, global climate change is under way, and there is a real potential for severe adverse environmental, social, and economic effects in the long term. Because every nation emits GHGs and therefore makes an incremental cumulative contribution to global climate change, cooperation on a global scale will be required to reduce the rate of GHG emissions to a level that can help to slow or stop the human -caused increase in average global temperatures and associated changes in climatic conditions. There are currently no state regulations in California that establish ambient air quality standards for GHGs. However, California has passed laws directing CARB to develop actions to reduce GHG emissions, and several state legislative actions related to climate change and GHG emissions have come into play in the past decade. Executive Order S-3-05 In 2005, in recognition of California's vulnerability to the effects of climate change, Governor Schwarzenegger established Executive Order S-3-05, which set forth a series of target dates by which statewide emissions of GHGs would be progressively reduced, as follows: By 2010, reduce GHG emissions to 2000 levels; By 2020, reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels; and By 2050, reduce GHG emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels. Assembly Bill 32 — California Global Warming Solutions Act California Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32), the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, requires CARE to establish a statewide GHG emissions cap for 2020 based on 1990 emission levels. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.4-3 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3 Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures ..nmm ... ......... ..®®,., 3.4 Greenhouse Gases AB 32 required GARB to adopt and enforce programs and regulations that identify and require selected sectors or categories of emitters of GHGs to report and verify their statewide GHG emissions. In December 2007 CARB adopted 427 MT CO2e as the statewide GHG emissions limit equivalent to the statewide levels for 1990. This is approximately 28 percent below forecasted 2020 "business -as -usual" emissions of 596 MMT of COze, and about 10 percent below average annual GHG emissions during the period of 2002 through 2004 (CARB, 2009). CARB published the Expanded List of Early Action Measures To Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions In California Recommended For Board Consideration in September 2007 (CARB, 2007). CARB adopted nine Early Action Measures for implementation, including Ship Electrification at Ports, Reduction of High Global -Warming -Potential Gases in Consumer Products, Heavy -Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction (Aerodynamic Efficiency), Reduction of Perfluorocarbon from Semiconductor Manufacturing, Improved Landfill Gas Capture, Reduction of Hydrofluorocarbon-134a from Do -It -Yourself Motor Vehicle Servicing, Sulfur Hexaflouride Reductions from the Non -Electric Sector, a Tire Inflation Program, and a Low Carbon Fuel Standard. As of January 1, 2012, the GHG emissions limits and reduction measures adopted in 2011 by CARB became enforceable. In designing emission reduction measures, CARB must aim to minimize costs, maximize benefits, improve and modernize California's energy infrastructure, maintain electric system reliability, maximize additional environmental and economic co -benefits for California, and complement the state's efforts to improve air quality. In December 2008, CARE approved the AB 32 Scoping Plan outlining the state's strategy to achieve the 2020 GHG emissions limit (CARB, 2009). This Scoping Plan, developed by CARB in coordination with the Climate Action Team (CAT), proposes a comprehensive set of actions designed to reduce overall GHG emissions in California, improve the environment, reduce dependence on oil, diversify California's energy sources, save energy, create new jobs, and enhance public health. As required by AB 32, the Scoping Plan must be updated at least every five years to evaluate the mix of AB 32 policies to ensure that California is on track to meet the targets set out in the legislation. In October 2013, a draft Update to the initial Scoping Plan was developed by CARB in collaboration with the California Climate Action Team (COAT). The draft Update builds upon the initial Scoping Plan with new strategies and expanded measures, and identifies opportunities to leverage existing and new funds to drive GHG emission reductions through strategic planning and targeted program investments. The draft Update to the initial Scoping Plan was presented to CARB's Board for discussion at its February 20, 2014 meeting. Subsequently, the first update to the AB 32 Scoping Plan was approved on May 22, 2014 by CARB. As part of the proposed update to the Scoping Plan, the emissions reductions required to meet the 2020 statewide GHG emissions limit were further adjusted. The primary reason for adjusting the 2020 statewide emissions limit was based on the fact that the original Scoping Plan relied on the Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.4-4 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures _, ........ 3.4 Greenhouse Gases Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's (IPCC) 1996 Second Assessment Report (SAR) to assign the global warming potentials (GWPs) of greenhouse gases. Recently, in accordance the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), international climate agencies have agreed to begin using the scientifically updated GWP values in the IPCC's Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) that was released in 2007. Because CARB has begun to transition to the use of the AR4 100 -year GWPs in its climate change programs, CARB recalculated the Scoping Plan's 1990 GHG emissions level with the AR4 GWPs. As the recalculation resulted in 431 MMTCO2e, the 2020 GHG emissions limit established in response to AB 32 is now slightly higher than the 427 MMTCO2e in the initial Scoping Plan. Considering that the proposed update also adjusted the 2020 BAU forecast of GHG emissions to 509 MMTCO2e, a 15 percent reduction below the estimated BAU levels was determined to be necessary to return to 1990 levels by 2020 (CARE, 2014b). Executive Order S-1-07 Executive Order S-1-07, which was signed by Governor Schwarzenegger in 2007, proclaims that the transportation sector is the main source of GHG emissions in California. It establishes a goal to reduce the carbon intensity of transportation fuels sold in California by at least 10 percent by 2020. As a result of this order, CARB approved a proposed regulation to implement the low carbon fuel standard (LCFS) on April 23, 2009, which will reduce GHG emissions from the transportation sector in California by about 16 MMT in 2020. The LCFS is designed to reduce California's dependence on petroleum, create a lasting market for clean transportation technology, and stimulate the production and use of alternative, low -carbon fuels in California. The LCFS is designed to provide a durable framework that uses market mechanisms to spur the steady introduction of lower carbon fuels. The framework establishes performance standards that fuel producers and importers must meet each year beginning in 2011. Senate Bill 375 SB 375, which establishes mechanisms for the development of regional targets for reducing passenger vehicle greenhouse gas emissions, was adopted by the State on September 30, 2008. On September 23, 2010, California ARB adopted the vehicular greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets that had been developed in consultation with the metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs); the targets require a 7 to 8 percent reduction by 2020 and between 13 to 16 percent reduction by 2035 for each MPO. SB 375 recognizes the importance of achieving significant greenhouse gas reductions by working with cities and counties to change land use patterns and improve transportation alternatives. Through the SB 375 process, MPOs, such as the Southern California Council of Governments (SLAG) will work with local jurisdictions in the development of sustainable communities strategies (SCS) designed to integrate development patterns and the transportation network in a way that reduces greenhouse gas emissions while meeting housing needs and other regional planning objectives. SCAG's reduction target for per capita vehicular emissions is 8 percent by 2020 and 13 percent by 2035 (CARB, 2010). The MPOs will prepare their first SCS according to their respective regional transportation plan (RTP) update schedule with the SCAG RTP/SCS adopted on April 4, 2012. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.4-5 ESA! D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 3.4 Greenhouse Gases Senate Bill 97 Senate Bill (SB) 97, enacted in August 2007, required the Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to develop guidelines for the mitigation of GHG emissions, or the effects related to releases of GHG emissions. On April 13, 2009, the OPR submitted proposed amendments to the Natural Resources Agency in accordance with SB 97 regarding analysis and mitigation of GHG emissions. As directed by SB 97, the Natural Resources Agency adopted Amendments to the CEQA Guidelines for greenhouse gas emissions on December 30, 2009. On February 16, 2010, the Office of Administrative Law approved the Amendments, and filed them with the Secretary of State for inclusion in the California Code of Regulations. The Amendments became effective on March 18, 2010. California Green Building Standard Code In January 2010, the State of California adopted the 2010 California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen), which became effective in January 2011. Building off of the initial 2008 California Green Building Code, the 2010 CALGreen Code represents a more stringent building code that requires, at a minimum, that new buildings and renovations in California meet certain sustainability and ecological standards. The 2010 CALGreen Code has mandatory Green Building provisions for all new residential buildings that are three stories or fewer (including hotels and motels) and all new non-residential buildings of any size that are not additions to existing buildings. In early 2013 the California Building Standards Commission adopted the 2013 California Building Standards Code that also included the latest 2013 CALGreen Code, which became effective on January 1, 2014. The mandatory provisions of the code are anticipated to reduce 3 MMT of GHG emissions by 2020, reduce water use by 20 percent or more, and divert 50 percent of construction waste from landfills. The 2013 California Energy Code (Title 24, Part 6), which is also part of the CALGreen Code (Title 24, Part 11, Chapter 5.2), became effective on July 1, 2014. As a method for determining significance under CEQA, SCAQMD developed a draft tiered flowchart in 2008 for determining significance thresholds for GHGs for industrial projects where SCAQMD is acting as the lead agency. In December 2008, SCAQMD adopted a 10,000 MTCO2e/year for industrial facilities, but only with respect to projects where SCAQMD is the lead agency. SCAQMD has not adopted a threshold for residential or commercial projects at the time of this writing. The SCAQMD flowchart uses a tiered approach in which a proposed project is deemed to have a less than significant impact related to GHG emissions when any of the following conditions are met: • GHG emissions are within GHG budgets in an approved regional plan; Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.4-6 ESA I D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Seldtng Impacts, and Mitigation Measures ......... �, 3.4 Greenhouse Gases 0 Incremental increases in GHG emissions due to the project are below the defined Significance Screening Levels, or Mitigated to Less than the Significance Screening Level; • Performance standards are met by incorporating project design features and/or implementing emission reduction measures; and • Carbon offsets are made to achieve target significance screening level. City of Baldwin Park General Plan Baldwin Park's General Plan Air Quality Element, Transportation Element, and Land use Elements sets forth a number of programs to reduce current pollution emissions and to require new development to include measures to reduce GHG emissions. The goals and policies that are related to the proposed Specific Plan are listed below (City of Baldwin Park, 2002) Air Quality Element Goal 1.0 Improve air quality by reducing the amount of air pollution through proper land use planning. Policy 1.2: Locate multiple family developments close to commercial areas to encourage pedestrian rather than vehicular travel. Policy 1.3: Encourage the development of higher density housing in close proximity to the City's Metrolink station. Policy IA: Provide for the enhancement of neighborhood commercial centers to provide services within walking distance of residential neighborhoods. Policy 1.5: Encourage the design of new residential and commercial areas to foster pedestrian circulation. Goal 2.0 Improve air quality by reducing the amount of vehicular emissions through planning for alternative forms of travel. Goal 3.0 Improve air quality by reducing the amount of vehicular emissions through transportation planning that encourages trip reduction. Policy 3.1: Utilize incentives, regulations and/or Transportation Demand Management (TDM) programs in cooperation with other jurisdictions in the South Coast Air Basin to eliminate vehicle trips which would otherwise be made. Policy 3.2: Utilize incentives, regulations, and/or Transportation Demand Management in cooperation with other jurisdictions to reduce the vehicle miles traveled for auto trips which still need to be made. Goal 4.0 Improve air quality by reducing vehicular emissions through transportation planning improvements that improve the flow of traffic. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.4-7 ESA! D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 3,4 Greenhouse Gases Policy 4.5: Implement citywide traffic flow improvement outlined in the Circulation Element. Policy 4.6: Adopt and implement the required components of the Congestion Management Plan, and continue to work with Los Angeles County on annual updates to the CMP. Transportation Element Goal 1.0: Provide a street and highway system in Baldwin Park that provides adequate capacity to ensure acceptable traffic flow. Policy IA: Maintain as a goal the provision of service levels at intersections along arterial highways at Level of Service "D" or better during morning and evening peak periods. Policy 1.6: Continue to automate traffic signals and to develop an integrated traffic signal control system. Goal 8.O: Provide a circulation system in Downtown that supports a cohesive pedestrian district. Pursue development of a Specific Plan that clearly defines circulation improvements in the area. Policy 8.2: Establish a mid -block pedestrian connection between the north and south sides of Ramona Boulevard with a pedestrian -activated signal. Utilize traffic calming techniques such as enhanced paving within travel lanes. Policy 8.7: Examine potential transit opportunities which could be developed to link the North Maine Avenue area with the Metrolink station. Policy 8.8: Examine potential transit opportunities which could be developed to link Downtown with the Metrolink station. Policy 8.9: Establish a pedestrian linkage between the Metrolink station and Downtown. Land Use Element Policy 1.4 Create opportunities for two different levels of commercial development: (1) commercial uses that meet the retail and service needs of the local resident and employee populations, and (2) regional -serving retail commercial businesses that capture revenues from a broader population base. Policy 1.6 Encourage mixed-use development of residential, retail, and commercial uses in Downtown and along the North Maine Avenue corridor as defined in the Land Use Policy Map under the Mixed Use designation. Policy 3.2 Provide development incentives to facilitate the consolidation of individual parcels along the City's commercial corridors and in industrial districts. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.4-8 ESA ( D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures ® ®.. m„ --- . ......... 3 4 Greenhouse Gases Policy 3.7 As part of the neighborhood beautification efforts, provide street trees and landscaping in the public rights-of-way. Policy 8.1 Provide for a mix of commercial and multi -family residential uses up to 30 units/acre to create 24-hour activity in the Downtown. Allow mixed-use development to consist of vertical integration of commercial and residential uses, as well as mixed uses side by side, on a lot -by -lot basis. Policy 8.2 Define Downtown as a pedestrian overlay zone, and require that new uses and buildings enhance pedestrian activity (refer to techniques outlined in Policy 3.1 of the Urban Design Element). Policy 8.3 Prohibit the use of areas between the sidewalk and a building within the pedestrian orientation zone for parking. Policy 8.4 Encourage the development of outdoor cafes, flower sales, stalls or kiosks, and other uses which are compatible with and stimulate pedestrian activity. Policy 8.5 Restrict non -pedestrian friendly uses (e.g., offices) to 25 percent of the ground floor of any block in this zone. Policy 8.6 Provide an area for limited commercial uses immediately south of the Metrolink platform and the adjacent Park and Ride area directed towards serving Metrolink riders. Establish a pedestrian linkage between the Metrolink platform and Downtown. Policy 8.7 Create an active "paseo" in the courtyard of City Hall. Provide pedestrian connections to Downtown. Policy 8.8 Pursue redesign of automobile -oriented shopping centers on Maine Avenue (Albertson's Center and Maine Avenue Marketplace) to orient some commercial uses towards Maine Avenue, and provide direct pedestrian access off Maine. Health and Sustainability Element The Health and Sustainability Element is not currently an adopted element with respect to the Baldwin Park General Plan, however once completed it will serve as the Health and Sustainability Element of the General Plan. The element will foster environmental stewardship and commitment to continuing to improve physical health. Overarching goals that would support GHG reduction initiatives include equitable development, walking, biking, transit use, green infrastructure, waste reduction, energy conservation and alternative energy use, and water management. 3.4.3 Thresholds of Significance In accordance with Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, a project could have a significant effect related to GHG emissions if it would: Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.4-9 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures _ ._,, ...,.. 3.4 Greenhouse Gases • Generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment; or • Conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs. Development projects implemented by the proposed Specific Plan would incrementally contribute to GHG emissions along with past, present and future activities. As such, impacts of GHG emissions are analyzed here on a cumulative basis. While SCAQMD has issued proposed standards and guidelines, there is no adopted state or local standard for determining the cumulative significance of the proposed Specific Plan's GHG emissions. In December 2008, SCAQMD adopted a 10,000 MTCO2e/year for industrial facilities, but only with respect to projects where SCAQMD is the lead agency. Additionally, SCAQMD has proposed, but not adopted, a 3,000 MT/year CO2e threshold for mixed use developments, a 3,500 MT/year CO2e threshold for residential developments, and a 1,400 MT/year CO2e threshold for commercial developments. As an alternative to the aforementioned proposed thresholds for residential, commercial, and mixed-use developments, SCAQMD has also recommended the use of a single numerical threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e/year for all non -industrial projects. These thresholds were developed for individual land use projects and are not effective for larger projects such as specific plans. For larger projects that do not meet any of the above screening thresholds, the SCAQMD has proposed an efficiency threshold of 4.6 MT CO2e per service population. Service population equals the total number of residents and employees within a development. These draft threshold options are being evaluated through the GHG Thresholds Working Group and have not been adopted as of this writing (SCAQMD, 2010). For the purposes of this analysis, the most appropriate threshold that would apply to the proposed Specific Plan would be the 4.6 MT CO2e per year efficiency threshold proposed by SCAQMD because it's a plan level project, which the other SCAQMD thresholds do not apply to. ME= M 097s rel Me SCAQMD recommends the use of CalEENlod for estimating construction and operational emissions associated with land use projects. CalEEMod incorporates the most recent (2011) versions of the Emission FACtors (EMFAC) and Off -Road Emissions (OFF-ROAD) models developed by CARB. CalEEMOd estimates the emissions of CO2, CH4, and N20 as well as the resulting total CO2e emissions associated with construction -related GHG sources such as off-road construction equipment, material delivery trucks, soil haul trucks, and construction worker vehicles. As CaIEEMod currently uses IPCC's 1996 SAR to assign the GWPs for CH4 and N20, the emissions for these two GHGs were taken from the CalEEMod outputs and converted to CO2e emissions outside of CaIEEMod using the updated GWPs from IPCC's AR4. The GHG analysis incorporates similar assumptions as the air quality analysis for consistency. Based on SCAQMD's 2008 Draft Guidance Document — Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Significance Threshold document, SCAQMD recommends that for construction GHG emissions Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.4-10 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures �._. ....... �._ — 3A Greenhouse Gases the total emissions for a project be amortized over a 30 -year period and added to its operational emission estimates (SCAQMD, 2008). Short-term construction -generated emissions of GHG's associated with the proposed Specific Plan were modeled using the California default values where specific information was not available, and reasonable assumptions based on the anticipated build out of the Specific Plan and default model settings were used to estimate criteria air pollutant and ozone precursor emissions. GHG emissions from construction activities are associated with emissions from the construction vehicles. Because the timing of construction of development projects implemented by the proposed Specific Plan would be in response to market conditions and developer applications for new land uses, it was conservatively assumed that 10 percent of the Specific Plan could be built in any given year (the Specific Plan build out is over 20 years). It was also assumed that there could be multiple construction projects occurring at any given time during any given year and therefore construction phases may overlap. Modeling input and output files are provided in Appendix C of this EIR. Operational emissions of GHGs, including GHGs generated by direct and indirect sources, are estimated according to the recommended methodologies from SCAQMD described above. Direct sources include emissions such as vehicle trips, natural gas consumption, and landscape maintenance. Indirect sources include off-site emissions occurring as a result of the Specific Plan's operations such as electricity and water consumption and solid waste disposal. The direct and indirect emissions generated during the proposed Specific Plan's operations were estimated using CalEEMod. Similar to the calculation of the Specific Plan's construction -related GHG emissions, the operational emissions of C114 and N20 were extracted from the CalEEMod output file and converted to CO2e emissions using the GWPs from IPCC's AR4. Modeling was based on Specific Plan data (e.g., size and type of proposed uses) and vehicle trip information from the Traffic Study prepared for the Project by The Mobility Group (Mobility Group, 2015). Annual operational GHG emissions associated with the existing uses within the Specific Plan area were also calculated using CalEEMod and subtracted from the Specific Plan's estimated annual operational emissions to properly assess the net increase in emissions that would occur from implementation of the Specific Plan at build out. 3.4.5 Impact Analysis Impact 3.4-1: The proposed project could generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment. Construction Emissions Construction activities would occur intermittently at different sites within the Specific Plan area until build -out. Although the related impacts at any one location would be temporary, construction of individual projects under the proposed Specific Plan could contribute to global climate change impacts. Construction activities would result in the emission of GHGs from equipment exhaust, construction -related vehicular activity and construction worker automobile trips. Emission levels for construction activities would vary depending on the number and type of equipment, duration of use, operation schedules, and the number of construction workers. Total Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.4-11 ESA / D130963 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3 Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mdlgation Measures 3.4 Greenhouse Gases estimated construction -related GHG emissions for the proposed Specific Plan are shown in Table 3.4-1. As shown, the Specific Plan's total estimated unmitigated and mitigated GHG emissions during construction would equal approximately 9,025 MTCOze. This would equal to approximately 301 MTCO2e per year after amortization over 30 years per SCAQMD methodology. TABLE 3.4-1 ESTIMATED TOTAL CONSTRUCTION -RELATED GHG EMISSIONS Emission Source Estimated COZB Emissions Unmitigated Construction Emissions Total' 9,025.38 (MT) Annual Construction (Amortized over 30 years) 300.85 (MT/Yr) 'Total emissions represents construction emissions of 100% or the new development. The 2016 value is 10% of total project emissions. NOTES: COZe= carbon dioxide equivalent; MT =metric tons; MT/yr = metric tons per year. SOURCE: ESA CalEEMod Modeling February 2015 Operational Emissions Area and indirect sources associated with the proposed Specific Plan would primarily result from electricity and natural gas consumption, water transport (the energy used to pump water), and solid waste generation from new land uses that would be implemented by the Specific Plan. GHG emissions from electricity consumed within the Specific Plan area would be generated off-site by fuel combustion at the electricity provider. GHG emissions from water transport are also indirect emissions resulting from the energy required to transport water from its source. In addition, the growth under the proposed Specific Plan would generate GHG emissions from motor vehicle trips. The estimated operational GHG emissions that would be generated from implementation of the Specific Plan are shown in Table 3.4-2. Additionally, in accordance with SCAQMD's recommendation, the Specific Plan's amortized construction -related GHG emissions from Table 3.4-1 are added to the operational emissions estimate in order to determine the Specific Plan's total annual GHG emissions. Furthermore, the annual operational GHG emissions associated with the existing uses in the Specific Plan area, which would be replaced by the Specific Plan, were also calculated using CalEEMod and subtracted from the Specific Plan's estimated annual GHG emissions to properly assess the net increase in emissions that would occur from Specific Plan implementation. As shown in Table 3.4-2, the proposed Specific Plan's total net annual GHG emissions would be approximately 16,713.70 MTCOZe per year (detailed calculations are included in Appendix C of this report). Given a service population (total of residents at full occupancy and full employment at build out) increase of 4,420, annual per service population GHG emissions for the proposed Specific Plan would be 3.78 MTCOze. This would not exceed SCAQMD's proposed efficiency Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project '^ 3.4-12 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 11_1 �...., . ......... .,,a.,,, _ ......... ........ 3.4 Greenhouse Gases level of 4.6 MTCO2e per year. Therefore, the net increase in GHG emissions resulting from implementation of the Specific Plan would be less than significant. TABLE 3.5-2 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATIONS -RELATED GHG EMISSIONS Estimated Emissions Emission Source COze (MT/yr) Construction Annual Mitigated Construction (Amortized over 30 300.85 years) Project Operations Area Sources 199.00 Energy Consumption 3,786.56 Mobile Sources 14,215.25 Solid Waste 843.31 Water Consumption 204.49 Total (Construction and Operational Emissions) 19,248.61 Existing Use Operations Area Sources 5.74 Energy Consumption 376.21 Mobile Sources 2,360.65 Solid Waste 47.79 Water consumption 45.36 Total Existing Emissions 2,835.76 Total Net Increase in Emissions 16,713.70 Service Population 4,420 COZe/ Service Population 3.78 Greater than 4.6 MTCOZe per service population? No NOTES: COZe= carbon dioxide equivalent; MT/yr = metric tons per year; %=percent The energy-related GHG emissions, as estimated by CalEEMod, use 2008 'rifle 24 energy usage rates. However, according to the CEC, nonresidential buhldings that are construe dead in accordance with the 2013 Building and Energy Efficiency Standards would be 15 percent more energy effident than the 2005 Standards, As sucdl, this additional reduction in energy consumption was aulcoonted for in the Project's estimated GHG emissions assocdurted with energy consumption. n GHG emissions reductions associated with water use re;wlttng from compliance with CALGreen requirements, which regauires a minimum 20 percent reduradon in indoor water use and the provision of irrigation controllers for outdoor water use, were accounted for in CalEEMod model run. Mitigation: No mitigation required Significance Determination: Less than significant Impact 3.5-2: The proposed project could conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.4-13 ESA ( D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3, Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures I'll, _ ........ ........ 34 Greenhouse Gases Consistency with CARB Scoping Plan Out of the Recommended Actions contained in CARB's Scoping Plan, the actions that are most applicable to the Specific Plan are Actions E-1 (increased Utility Energy efficiency programs including more stringent building and appliance standards), GB -1 (Green building), and W-1 (Increased water use efficiency). CARB Scoping Plan Action E-1, together with Action GB -1 (Green Building), aims to reduce electricity demand by increased efficiency of Utility Energy Programs and adoption of more stringent building and appliance standards, while Action W-1 aims to promote water Use efficiency. The proposed Specific Plan would be required to include all mandatory green building measures for new developments under the CALGreen Code. As such, compliance with the Green Building Practices Ordinance would result in additional reductions in energy and water consumption above current CALGreen Code requirements. Therefore, the proposed Specific Plan would be consistent with the Scoping Plan measures through incorporation of stricter building and appliance standards. Consistency with SCAG Sustainable Communities Strategy SB 375 requires SCAG to provide a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) that will reduce GHG emissions from passenger vehicles and achieve the Regional Reduction Targets for GHG emissions from light-duty autos and trucks in the SCAG area. The SCS achieves the Regional Reduction Targets by providing changes in land use patterns that promote reductions in VMT and vehicle trips including transit oriented development with a mix of residential and commercial land uses that promote the use of transit rather than individual vehicles. The proposed Specific Plan would implement many of the SCAG policies related to high-density, infill development that are focus on public transit opportunities. The Specific Plan would involve the revitalization of an already developed urban area with infill development that would make use of the existing circulation and utility infrastructure. The Specific Plan would also introduce high- density residential uses, thus creating a mixed-use environment in which residents would benefit from nearby shopping and employment opportunities. All of this new development would be within walking distance of the Baldwin Park Metrolink station, which would encourage users of the Specific Plan area to use public transportation, which would reduce GHG emissions. Additional detail of the proposed Specific Plan's consistency with SCAG policies are provided in Section 3.8, Land Use in Table 3.8-2. As further described in this table, the Specific Plan would be consistent with SCAG SCS, and impacts would be less than significant. Consistency with City of Baldwin Park General Plan The proposed Specific Plan is consistent with most of the General Plan policies for the Downtown. The Specific Plan proposes to amend some General Plan land uses and zoning designations of parcels to implement the Specific Plan, and, as a result, the City would coordinate with SCAG to adjust the City's households forecast in future updates to the RTP. Overall, the Specific Plan would not result in a conflict with the General Plan because the proposed Specific Plan is generally consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan that aim at enhancing Downtown Baldwin Park by introducing mixed uses and creating a pedestrian -friendly environment. Additional detail of the proposed Specific Plan's consistency with General Plan Baldwin Park 7DD Specific Plan Project 3.4-14 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures __ ......... �.... 3 4 Greenhouse Gases policies are provided in Section 3.8, Land Use in Table 3.8-3. As further described in this table, the Specific Plan would be consistent with the City's General Plan and impacts would be less than significant. Therefore, as implementation of the proposed Specific Plan would not hinder or adversely affect the statewide attainment of GHG emission reduction goals of AB 32 (See Impact 3.5-1), and would be consistent with the CARB Scoping Plan, the SCAG SCS and the City's General Plan. Therefore, impacts related to conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs would be less than significant. Mitigation: No mitigation required Significance Determination: Less than significant Cumulative Analysis GHG impacts are assessed in a cumulative context since no single project can cause a discernible change to climate. Climate change impacts are the result of incremental contributions from natural processes, and past and present anthropogenic activities. The area in which the proposed Project, as well as any other past, present, or future project, could contribute to a significant cumulative climate change impact would not be defined by a geographical boundary such as Los Angeles County or the Basin. GHGs have high atmospheric lifetimes and can travel across the globe over a period of 50 to 100 years or more. Therefore, GHG impacts are addressed in the context of the global issue of climate change. As described above, when the amortized construction emissions are added to the project's operational emissions from the Specific Plan, the annual per service population GHG emissions for the proposed Specific Plan would be 3.78MTCO2e, which would not exceed SCAQMD's proposed efficiency level of 4.6 MTCO2e per year. Because GHGs are assessed in a cumulative context, and implementation of the Specific Plan would result in GHGs that would not exceed the threshold, cumulative impacts would be less than significant. In addition, the Specific Plan would be implemented in compliance with state mandates, such as the CALGreen Code, which would reduce GHG emissions. As a result, implementation of the Specific Plan would not generate greenhouse gasses that would be cumulatively considerable, and cumulative impacts would be than significant. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.4-15 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures ......... 3A Greenhouse Gases References — Greenhouse Gas Emissions Ahrens, D.C. 2003. Meteorology Today: An Introduction to Weather, Climate, and the Environment. Brooks Cole, Inc. Pacific Grove, CA. California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2014x. California Greenhouse Gas Inventory for 2000- 2012 — by Category as Defined in the 2008 Scoping Plan. Available: < http://www. arb.ca.gov/cc/inventory/data/tables/ghg_inventory_scopingplan_00-12_2014- 03-24.pdf >. CARB. 2014b. Proposed First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan: Building on the Framework. February. CARE. 2011. Final Supplement to the AB 32 Scoping Plan Functional Equivalent Document. Available: <http://www. arb.ca. gov/cc/scopingplan/document/fi nal_supplement_to_sp–fed.pdf>. August 19. CARB. 2010. Proposed SB 375 Greenhouse Gas Targets: Documentation of the Resulting Emission Reductions based on MPO Data, August 9, 2010. GARB, 2009. Climate Change Scoping Plan: A Frameworkfor Change, available online: http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/document/adopted_ scoping_plan.pdf, published December 2008, amended version included errata and Board requested modifications posted May 11, 2009. GARB. 2007. Expanded List of Early Action Measures to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions in California Recommended For Board Consideration. Available: <http://www.arb.ca.gov/ce/ccea/meetings/ea–final report.pdf>. October. California Climate Action Registry (CCAR). 2009. California Climate Action Registry General Reporting Protocol, Version 3.1. Los Angeles, CA. Available at http://www.climateregistry.org/resources/docs/protocols/grp/GRP-3.1_January2009.pdf. January. City of Baldwin Park, Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan, November 20, 2002. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2001. Climate Change 2001: Working Group P The Scientific Basis. Last revised: 2001. Available: <http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc%5Ftar/wgl/032.htm#f5>. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2007. Climate Change 2007, Working Group III Report, Mitigation of Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland. Mobility Group, The 2015. City of Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan Traffic Study. January 23. South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). 2010. Greenhouse Gas CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #15. Available at: <http://www. agmd.gov/cega/handbook/GHG/2010/sept28mtg/ghgmtg 15-web.pdf>. September. SCAQMD. 2008. Draft Guidance Document –Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Significance Threshold. October 2008. _..,, ......... ......... ------ _ Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.4-16 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3 Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3.5 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Introduction This section provides an evaluation of the potential for hazards and hazardous materials impacts from implementation of the proposed Specific Plan. This analysis identifies existing and potential hazards and hazardous materials within the Specific Plan area and surrounding vicinity, as well as potential hazards and hazardous materials resulting from construction and operation of the proposed project. Water quality issues are discussed in Section 3.6, Hydrology and Water Quality and air quality issues are described in Section 3.2, Air Quality. Hazardous Materials Definition As used in this EIR, the term "hazardous materials" refers to both hazardous substances and hazardous wastes. Under federal and state laws, materials, including wastes, may be considered hazardous if they are specifically listed by statute as such or if they exhibit one of the four characteristics: are poisonous (toxicity), can be ignited by open flame (ignitability), can corrode other materials (corrosivity), or can react violently, explode or generate vapors when mixed with water (reactivity). The term "hazardous material" is defined in law as any material that, because of quantity, concentration, or physical or chemical characteristics, poses a significant present or potential hazard to human health and safety or to the environment (California Health and Safety Code, Section 25501(o)). In some cases, past industrial or commercial activities could have resulted in spills or leaks of hazardous materials, resulting in soil and/or groundwater contamination. The presence of certain hazardous materials can also lead to the buildup of methane gas which, if trapped under structures, can become an explosive hazard. Hazardous materials may also be present in building materials and released during building demolition activities. Federal and state laws require that hazardous materials be specially managed. Excavated soils having concentrations of contaminants such as lead, gasoline, or industrial solvents that are higher than certain acceptable levels must be managed, treated, transported, and/or disposed of as a hazardous waste. The California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 22, Sections 66261.20 through 66261.24, contains technical descriptions of characteristics that would cause a soil to be designated a hazardous waste. California regulations are compliant with federal regulations and in most cases, are more stringent. Regulations also govern the management of potentially hazardous building materials such as asbestos, lead-based paint, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) during demolition activities that could potentially disturb existing building materials. 3.5.1 Environmental Setting This section summarizes known or possible contamination of soil and groundwater (including contamination of regional groundwater resources as well as known local soil and groundwater resources), and identifies hazardous materials that may be present in existing buildings and building components that could be removed with implementation of the proposed Specific Plan ..—_ Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan... ®, _._._. ... ,,,,,,,,, ,,,, an Project 3.5-1 ESA / D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting,Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3.5 Hazards and Hazardous Materials (such as underground storage tanks, septic tanks, asbestos, lead-based paint, and PCB -containing components). Existing Land Uses The Specific Plan area is developed, urban and includes a variety of land uses, a majority of which are commercial retail (36 percent), public uses (17 percent), and residential (7 percent). The government and public facilities in the Specific Plan area includes: City Hall, the police station, post office, Morgan Park and the Community Center, Arts and Recreation Center, Julia McNeill Senior Center, Baldwin Park Transit Center, the Metrolink station. There are no public schools in the Specific Plan area. However, Central Elementary School and Baldwin Park High School are located approximately 0.25 mile to the southeast of the Specific Plan area, and Vineland Elementary School is approximately 0.25 mile to the south. Hazardous materials are routinely used, stored, and transported within the Specific Plan area and are associated with existing land uses, such as: auto repair, gasoline service stations, dry cleaners, restaurants that utilize or store cleaning substances, solvents, adhesives, chemicals or other hazardous materials. Past and current land uses can be important indicators of whether hazardous materials were likely used at a site and whether they may be present in the subsurface soil and groundwater. Portions of the Specific Plan area were historically used for agricultural purposes. Development in the area began in the early 1900s with a variety of industrial and commercial operations that may have included the generation, use, storage, or disposal of hazardous materials. These past and current operations in the Specific Plan area that may involve hazardous materials include: gasoline service stations; automobile and truck repair facilities; dry cleaners; machine shops; commercial printing and photo developing; pest control; and agriculture. Constituents of environmental concern common to these uses include petroleum hydrocarbons, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), metals, PCBs, and pesticides. The results of the environmental records search conducted by EDR identified 11 sites within the Specific Plan area that are on regulatory agency lists of known or possible soil or groundwater contamination sites. These sites include the following: one regional plume of groundwater contamination; four properties that have known impacts to soil or groundwater due to current or former underground storage tanks (USTs) or aboveground storage tanks (ASTs); and 10 facilities that generate, use, or store hazardous materials. These sites are described below. Known Contamination of Regional Groundwater Resources The City of Baldwin Park lies within the San Gabriel Valley (Area 2) NPL site. The NPL contains the nation's highest priority sites for cleanup. The San Gabriel Basin aquifer, an important source of drinking water, has been contaminated from numerous sources within the 170 -square -mile San Gabriel Valley. Groundwater contamination was first discovered in 1979. The most prevalent contaminants in groundwater are trichloroethene (TCE), perchloroethylene Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.5-2 ESA / D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2016 3, Environmental tiett�ing impacts, and MiGglil�ion Measures ._ -_ .A�®, ......._ .. "' _ .5 tl WaOsand Hazardous Materials (PCE), carbon tetrachloride, perchlorate, and N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA), which are used either as solvents for degreasing or as components of rockets. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) has identified 19 Potentially Responsible Parties as significant contributors to the groundwater contamination, none of which are located within the Specific Plan area. The Potentially Responsible Parties are ultimately responsible for funding the design, construction, and operation of the groundwater cleanup facilities. To date, four "pump and treat" (i.e., groundwater extraction and treatment) facilities have been built with a combined treatment capacity of 26,000 gallons per minute, equivalent to 37 million gallons per day. Water utilities in the area have continued to provide their customers with clean water by blending, obtaining water from neighboring utilities, and installing wellhead treatment systems (USEPA, October 2014). Approximately 78 billion gallons of groundwater have been treated and approximately 62 thousand pounds of contamination has been removed through December 2013 (USEPA, October 2014). Groundwater is approximately 196 feetl below ground surface (bgs) in the Specific Plan area; therefore exposure to contaminated groundwater does not occur. Known Local Soil or Groundwater Contamination Sources Four sites within the Specific Plan area were listed on the regulatory agency database search for having soil or groundwater contamination and are dry cleaners, which typically create environmental concerns due to the generation and storage of hazardous materials. • Bonita Cleaners, located at 4205 Maine Avenue. There are no violations or contamination reported for Bonita Cleaners. McDaniels Cleaners, located at 14238 Ramona Boulevard. This address is listed on SWRCB's GeoTracker database as a Cleanup Program Site with a cleanup status of Open -Inactive as of November 3, 2014. The Open -Inactive status means no regulatory oversight activities are being conducted. A leak of VOCs that affected the aquifer used for drinking water supply was reported in January, 1965. Additionally, the site is listed as public participation category 1, or sites that are characterized by soil or groundwater contamination that does not pose an immediate human health threat and does not extend off-site onto neighboring properties. The remaining two sites listed for soil or groundwater contamination are located within the Specific Plan area, but not within an Opportunity Site. • Thrifty #293 gasoline station located at 4258 N. Maine Avenue reported a leaking underground storage tank (LUST) in September, 1991. Waste oil had affected the soil under the LUST. The remediation was complete and the case maintains a Completed - Case Closed status since September 26, 1995. • The, City of Baldwin Park City Hall property located at 14403 E Pacific Avenue reported a LUST in January, 1993. The UST contained diesel that leaked and affected the soil below the UST. The site file lists a cleanup status of Completed — Case Closed as of September 28, 1999. i ERM West, Inc. and NewFields, LLC. 2014.2013 Annual Performance Evaluation Report Volume l: Baldwin Park Operable Unit of the San Gabriel Valley Superfund Sites, Los Angeles County, California. April 7. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.5- 3 ESA / D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3, Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures ,m ...... 3.5 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Sites with Potential Local Soil or Groundwater Contamination The regulatory agency database search identified properties within the Specific Plan area that generate, use, transport, or dispose of hazardous materials and/or hazardous waste. Specifically these sites are listed on the federal RCRA generators list; EnvirStor; and the state registered storage tank list. The sites identified by these databases are listed below: Federal RCRA generators list This database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by RCRA. Large quantity generators generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Small quantity generators generate between 100 kg and 1,00kg of hazardous waste per month and include the following sites located within the Specific Plan area, but not within. an Opportunity Site. • O'Reilly Auto Parts, 14503 Ramona Boulevard, is listed as a large quantity generator. The site is listed as generating mercury, 2H-1-Benzopyrane-2-one, 4-HYDROXY-3-(3- OXO- I-PHENYLBUTYL), and SALTS, when present at concentrations greater than 0.3 percent 1,2-Benzenediol, 4-[1-HYDROXY-2-(METHYLAMINO)ETHYL], nicotine and salts, and nitroglycerine. No violations have been reported in connection with the hazardous waste generated. • GTE California, 14436 Ramona Boulevard, is listed as small quantity generator. Specifically, the property generates waste oil, mixed oil, and PCBs. No violations have been reported in connection with the hazardous waste generated. • Sharp One Hour Photo, 14519 Ramona Boulevard, is listed as a small quantity generator. Data received in 1993 lists metal sludge and other as the inorganic solid wastes generated. No violations have been reported for the property. • David Deming Auto, 3928 Downing Unit A B, is listed as a small quantity generator. Data received by the agency from 1995 lists unspecified aqueous solution and waste oil being generated at the property. No violations have been reported for the property. State and Tribal Registered Storage Tank List The UST database lists registered USTs, which are regulated under Subtitle I of RCRA. The data come from the SWRCB's Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database. The following sites in the database are located within the Specific Plan area, but not within an Opportunity Site. • GTE California located at 14436 Ramona Boulevard • Arco Products #09671 located at 4258 Maine Avenue • City of Baldwin Park (City Hall) located at 14403 Pacific Avenue Potential Hazardous Materials in Structural and Building Components Hazardous materials, such as asbestos, lead, and PCBs, may also be contained in building materials and components. Procedures for dealing with these materials, and for safely removing and disposing of them in accordance with applicable regulations, have been developed by oversight agencies and are described below. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.5-4 ESA / D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures ..�... ... .., . _ ...... _. .. � ®, .. ......_. 3.5 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Asbestos Potential Asbestos is a naturally -occurring fibrous material that was used as a fireproofing and insulating agent in building construction before such uses were banned by USEPA in the 1970s, although some nonfriable2 use of asbestos in roofing materials still exists. The presence of asbestos can be found in materials such as ducting insulation, wallboard, shingles, ceiling tiles, floor tiles, insulation, plaster, floor backing, and many other building materials. Asbestos and asbestos - containing materials (ACMs) are considered both a hazardous air pollutant and a human health hazard. The risk to human health is from inhalation of airborne asbestos, which commonly occurs when ACMs are disturbed during such activities as demolition and renovation. Due to the age of the buildings within the Specific Plan area, it is likely that ACMs are present. Lead Potential In 1978, the Consumer Product Safety Commission set the allowable lead levels in paint at 0.06 percent by weight in a dry film of newly applied paint. In the 1970s, the chief concern for lead- based paint was its cumulative effect on body systems, primarily when paint chips containing lead were ingested by children. Research in the early 1980s showed that lead dust is of special concern because the smaller particles are more easily absorbed by the body. Common methods of paint removal, such as sanding, scraping, and burning, create excessive amounts of dust. Lead dust is especially hazardous to young children because they play on the floor and engage in a great deal of hand-to-mouth activity, increasing their potential for exposure. Lead-based paints were commonly used in buildings built prior to 1970s. Since many of the structures located within the Specific Plan area were built prior to the federal regulations banning its use, lead-based paints are likely to exist in the existing structures. Polychlorinated Biphenyls Potential PCBs are organic oils that were formerly placed in many types of electrical equipment, including transformers and capacitors, primarily as electrical insulators. They may also be contained in hydraulic fluid used for hoists, elevators, etc. Years after widespread and commonplace installation, it was discovered that exposure to PCBs may cause various deleterious health effects and that PCBs are highly persistent in the environment. These substances have been listed as carcinogens by USEPA. PCBs were banned from use in electrical capacitors, electrical transformers, vacuum pumps, and gas turbines in 1979. Because of the age of many of the properties, there is a potential for PCBs within the Specific Plan area. No schools are located within the project area. However, four schools are located within 0.25 mile of the Specific Plan area, which include: • St. John the Baptist School, 3870 Stewart Avenue, is approximately 0.20 mile southwest of the Specific Plan area. 2 Nonfriable asbestos refers to ACMs that contain asbestos fibers in a solid matrix that does not allow for them to be easily released. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.5-5 ESA I D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3, Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3.5 Hazards an� d Hazardous Materials • Central Elementary School, 14741 Central Avenue, is approximately 0.25 mile southeast of the Specific Plan area. • Baldwin Park High School, 3900 N Puente Avenue, is approximately 0.25 mile southeast of the Specific Plan area. • Vineland Elementary School, 3609 Vineland Avenue, is approximately 0.25 -mile south of the Specific Plan area. The Baldwin Park Police Department maintains an emergency plan called the Baldwin Park Multi -hazard Functional Plan. The Governor's Office of Emergency Services has approved the plan. The City reviews the plan annually as required by law and updates the plan as necessary. The plan identifies potential threats to the community based on studies conducted by the Police Department in conjunction with other City departments. The plan sets forth the City's planned response to emergency situations including earthquake, fire, major rail and roadway accident, flooding, hazardous materials incident, civil disturbances, nuclear, chemical, biological incidents, and terrorists activities. The Chief of Police is the designated Assistant Director of Emergency Services responsible for coordinating all response activities. The emergency response plan designates evacuation routes and facilities for various types of hazards. During the response phase of an emergency, all communications such as requests for resources and equipment are sent to the Los Angeles County Operational Area Emergency Operation Center via the Los Angeles County Sheriff s Department Industry station, or by the County's internet-based Emergency Management Information System. The American Red Cross maintains responsibility for designating an appropriate evacuation center within each community depending on the level and type of emergency. Evacuation routes and emergency facilities in the event of a fire, hazardous materials incident, flood, or other disaster are identified in Figure PS -4 of the General Plan. These routes include Ramona Boulevard and Pacific Avenue south of Ramona Boulevard, which are located within the Specific Plan area. Federal, state, and local regulations govern the range of hazardous materials issues that may be encountered during demolition, construction, and ongoing operation in the project area. Various state and local regulatory agencies implement these regulations to minimize the risk to human health and the environment from hazardous materials. In addition, the goals and policies of the City of Baldwin Park related to hazards and hazardous materials are also listed. The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) was enacted by Congress in 1980. This law is also known as Superfund. CERCLA created a tax on the chemical and petroleum industries and provided broad Federal authority to respond directly to Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.5-6 ESA P D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environme11ntal „ pitting, ImpI'llacts, and Mitigation Measures 3.5 Hazards and Hazardous Materials releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances that may endanger public health or the environment. CERCLA established prohibitions and requirements concerning closed and abandoned hazardous waste sites, provided for liability of persons responsible for releases of hazardous waste at these sites, and established a trust fund to provide for cleanup when no responsible party could be identified. There are four classes of Superfund liable parties: current owners and operators of a facility, past owners and operators of a facility at the time hazardous wastes were disposed, generators and parties that arranged for the disposal or transport of the hazardous substances, and transporters of hazardous wastes that selected the site where the hazardous substances were brought. The law authorizes two kinds of response actions: • Short-term removals, where actions may be taken to address releases or threatened releases requiring prompt response. Long-term remedial response actions, that permanently and significantly reduce the dangers associated with releases or threats of releases of hazardous substances that are serious, but not immediately life threatening. These actions can be conducted only at sites listed on EPA's NPL. CERCLA was amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) in 1986. SARA stressed the importance of permanent remedies and innovative treatment technologies in cleaning up hazardous waste sites; required Superfund actions to consider the standards and requirements found in other state and federal environmental laws and regulations; provided new enforcement authorities and settlement tools; increased state involvement in every phase of the Superfund program; increased the focus on human health problems posed by hazardous waste sites; encouraged greater citizen participation in making decisions on how sites should be cleaned up; and increased the size of the trust fun to $8.5 billion. SARA also required EPA to revise the Hazard Ranking System (HRS) to ensure that is accurately assessed the relative degree of risk to human health and the environment posed by uncontrolled hazardous waste sites that may be placed on the NPL. EPA's Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER) in Washington, D.C. oversees the Superfund program. The Superfund Enforcement program gets Superfund sites cleaned up by finding the companies or people responsible for contamination at a site, and negotiating with them to do the clean-up themselves, or to pay for the clean-up done by another party (i.e., EPA, or other responsible parties). If a responsible party does not agree to do the cleanup, EPA can issue an order to do certain work, or work with the Department of Justice to pursue the party through the federal court system. If a party is out of compliance with an order or settlement, the Superfund enforcement program takes action to bring them into compliance. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.5-7 ESA t D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3.5 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Resource Conservation and Recovery Act The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) was passed by Congress in 1976 as the primary law governing the disposal of solid and hazardous waste. RCRA set national goals for: protecting human health and the environment from the potential hazards of waste disposal; conserving energy and natural resources; reducing the amount of waste generated; and ensuring that wastes are managed in an environmentally -sound manner. There are three programs under RCRA to assist in achieving the goals listed above: • The solid waste program which encourages states to develop comprehensive plans to manage non -hazardous industrial solid waste and municipal solid waste landfills and other solid waste disposal facilities, and prohibits the open dumping of solid waste. • The hazardous waste program establishes a system for controlling hazardous waste from the time it is generated until its ultimate disposal — in effect, from "cradle to grave." • The UST program regulates USTs containing hazardous substances and petroleum products. RCRA banned all open dumping of waste, encouraged source reduction and recycling, and promoted safe disposal of municipal waste. RCRA also mandated strict controls over the treatment, storage, and disposal of hazardous waste. Toxic Substances Control Act The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) of 1976 provides EPA with authority to require reporting, record-keeping and testing requirements, and restrictions relating to chemical substances and/or mixtures. TSCA addresses the production, importation, use and disposal of specific chemicals including PCBs, asbestos, radon and lead-based paint. U.S. Department of Transportation. Hazardous Materials Transport Act (49 USC 5101) The U.S. Department of Transportation, in conjunction with the USEPA, is responsible for enforcement and implementation of federal laws and regulations pertaining to transportation of hazardous materials. The Hazardous Materials Transportation Act of 1974 directs the U.S. Department of Transportation to establish criteria and regulations regarding the safe storage and transportation of hazardous materials. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 49, 171-180, regulates the transportation of hazardous materials, types of material defined as hazardous, and the marking of vehicles transporting hazardous materials. State Health and Safety Code, Section 25249.5 et seq. Safe Drinking Water and Toxics Enforcement Act, Proposition 65 This law identifies chemicals that cause cancer and reproductive toxicity, provides information for the public, and prevents discharge of the chemicals into sources of drinking water. Lists of the chemicals of concern are published and updated periodically. Businesses are required to notify Californians about the chemicals in products they purchase, in the workplace, or that are released Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.5-8 ESA / D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3, Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 3.5 Hazards and Hazardous Materials to the environment. By providing this information, individuals are able to make informed decisions about protecting themselves from exposure to these chemicals. Health and Safety Code, Section 25270, Aboveground Petroleum Storage Act Health and Safety Code Sections 25270 to 25270.13 ensure compliance with the federal Clean Water Act. The law applies to facilities that operate a petroleum aboveground storage tank with a capacity greater than 660 gallons or combined aboveground storage tanks capacity greater than 1,320 gallons or oil -filled equipment where there is a reasonable possibility that the tank(s) or equipment may discharge oil in "harmful quantities" into navigable waters or adjoining shore lands. If a facility falls under these criteria, it must prepare a Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plan. Government Code Section 65962.5, Cortese List The provisions in Government Code Section 65962.5 are commonly referred to as the "Cortese List" (after the Legislator who authored and enacted the legislation). The list, or a site's presence on the list, has bearing on the local permitting process as well on compliance with CEQA. The Department of Toxic Substances Control shall compile and update as appropriate, but at least annually, and shall submit to the Secretary for Environmental Protection a list of the following: All hazardous waste facilities subject to corrective action pursuant to Section 25187.5 of the Health and Safety Code. 2. All land designated as hazardous waste property or border zone property pursuant to Article 11 (commencing with Section 25220) of Chapter 6.5 of Division 20 of the Health and Safety Code. 3. All information received by the Department of Toxic Substances Control pursuant to Section 25242 of the Health and Safety Code on hazardous waste disposals on public land. 4. All sites listed pursuant to Section 25356 of the Health and Safety Code 5. All sites included in the Abandoned Site Assessment Program. The State Department of Health Services shall compile and update as appropriate but at least annually, and shall submit to the Secretary for Environmental Protection, a list of all public drinking water wells that contain detectable levels of organic contaminants and that are subject to water analysis pursuant to Section 116395 of the Health and Safety Code. The State Water Resources Control Board shall compile and update as appropriate, but at least annually, and shall submit to the Secretary for Environmental Protection, a list of all of the following: 1. All underground storage tanks for which an unauthorized release report is filed pursuant to Section 25295 of the Health and Safety Code. 2. All solid waste disposal facilities from which there is a migration of hazardous waste and for which a California regional water quality control board has notified the Department of . __... ._......... Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project............................ 3.5-9 ESA I D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures_ 3.5 Hazards and HazardousmMaterials Toxic Substances Control pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 13273 of the Water Code. 3. All cease and desist orders issued after January 1, 1986, pursuant to Section 13301 of the Water Code, and all cleanup or abatement orders issued after January 1, 1986, pursuant to Section 13304 of the Water Code, that concern the discharge of wastes that are hazardous materials. The local enforcement agency, as designated pursuant to Section 18051 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, shall compile as appropriate, but at least annually, and shall submit to the California Integrated Waste Management Board, a list of all solid waste disposal facilities from which there is a known migration of hazardous waste. The California Integrated Waste Management Board shall compile the local lists into a statewide list, which shall be submitted to the Secretary for Environmental Protection and shall be available to any person who requests the information. The Secretary for Environmental Protection shall consolidate the information submitted pursuant to this section and distribute it in a timely fashion to each city and county in which sites on the lists are located. The secretary shall distribute the information to any other person upon request. The secretary may charge a reasonable fee to persons requesting the information, other than cities, counties, or cities and counties, to cover the cost of developing, maintaining, and reproducing and distributing the information. Hazardous Materials and Waste Handling Excavated soil containing hazardous substances and hazardous building materials would be classified as a hazardous waste if they exhibit the characteristics of ignitability, corrosivity, reactivity, or toxicity (CCR, Title 22, Division 4.5, Chapter 11, Article 3). State and federal laws require detailed planning to ensure that hazardous materials are properly handled, used, stored, and disposed of, and in the event that such materials are accidentally released, to prevent or to mitigate injury to health or the environment. These laws and regulations are overseen by a variety of state and local agencies. The California Integrated Waste Management Board and the RWQCB specifically address management of hazardous materials and waste handling in their adopted regulations (CCR, Title 14 and CCR, Title 27). In the Specific Plan area, LACDPW Environmental Programs Division is responsible for implementing the UST Program, and the Los Angeles County Fire Department Health Hazardous Materials Division (LACFD-HHMD) is the Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) responsible for implementing the following program elements: • Hazardous Waste Generator and Onsite Hazardous Waste Treatment Programs (Tiered Permitting); • Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plan (SPCC); Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.5-10 ....� ..... __...... ............._ ESA / D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3 Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures _ 3.5 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and Inventory Program (Hazardous Materials Disclosure or "Community -Right -to Know"); • California Accidental Release Prevention Program (Cal ARP); and Uniform Fire Code Plans and Inventory Requirements. The laws and regulations that established these programs require that businesses that use or store certain quantities of hazardous materials submit a Hazardous Materials Business Plan (HMBP) that describes the hazardous materials usage, storage, and disposal to the local oversight agency (CUPA). Aboveground and underground storage tanks must be properly permitted. The County may perform inspections and issue citations to businesses not in compliance with these regulations. Health and Safety Code, Section 2550 et seq. This code and the related regulations in 19 California Code of Regulations (CCR) 2620, et seq., require local governments to regulate local business storage of hazardous materials in excess of certain quantities. The law also requires that entities storing hazardous materials be prepared to respond to releases. Those using and storing hazardous materials are required to submit a HMBP to their local CUPA and to report releases to their CUPA and the State Office of Emergency Services. Health and Safety Code, Section 25531 et seq. This code and the California Accidental Release Program regulate the registration and handling of regulated substances. Regulated substances are any chemicals designated as an extremely hazardous substance by USEPA as part of its implementation of SARA Title III. Health and Safety Code Section 25531 overlaps or duplicates some of the requirements of SARA and the Clean Air Act. Facilities handling or storing regulated substances at or above threshold reportable quantities must register with their local CUPA and prepare a risk management plan. Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and Inventory Act of 1985 The Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and Inventory Act, also known as the Business Plan Act, requires businesses using hazardous materials to prepare a plan that describes their facilities, inventories, emergency response plans, and training programs. Business plans contain basic information on the location, type, quantity, and health risks of hazardous materials stored, used, or disposed. Worker Safety Occupational safety standards exist in federal and state laws to minimize worker safety risks from both physical and chemical hazards in the workplace. The California Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA) and the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) are the agencies responsible for assuring worker safety in the workplace. Cal/OSHA assumes primary responsibility for developing and enforcing standards for safe workplaces and work practices. At sites known or possible to be contaminated, a Site Safety Plan __ _ ......— Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.5-11 ESA I D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3.5 Hazards and Hazardous Materials must be prepared. The Site Safety Plan establishes policies and procedures to protect workers and the public from exposure to potential hazards at a contaminated site. Prior to renovation or demolition of buildings containing asbestos, contractors licensed to conduct asbestos abatement work must be retained. Asbestos abatement contractors must follow state regulations contained in 8 CCR 1529, and 8 CCR 341.6 through 341.14 where there is asbestos- related work involving 100 square feet or more of asbestos containing material. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and the California Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Cal/OSHA) must be notified ten days prior to initiating construction and demolition activities. Asbestos encountered during demolition of an existing building must be transported and disposed of at an appropriate facility. The contractor and hauler of the material are required to file a Hazardous Waste Manifest which details the hauling of the material from the site and the disposal of it. Section 19827.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, adopted January 1, 1991, requires that local agencies not issue demolition or alteration permits until an applicant has demonstrated compliance with notification requirements under applicable federal regulations regarding hazardous air pollutants, including asbestos. In 1979, the USEPA banned the use of PCBs in most new electrical equipment and began a program to phase out certain existing PCB -containing equipment. The use and management of PCBs in electrical equipment is regulated pursuant to the Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 USC Section 2601 et seq. The Toxic Substances Control Act and its implementing regulations generally require labeling and periodic inspection of certain types of PCB equipment and set forth detailed safeguards to be followed for disposal of such items. Lead and Lead -Based Paint Regulations to manage and control exposure to lead-based paint are described in CFR Title 29, Section 1926.62 and CCR Title 8 Section 1532.1. These regulations cover the demolition, removal, cleanup, transportation, storage and disposal of lead -containing material. The regulations outline the permissible exposure limit, protective measures, monitoring and compliance to ensure the safety of construction workers exposed to lead-based materials. Cal/OSHA's Lead in Construction Standard requires project proponents to develop and implement a lead compliance plan when lead-based paint would be disturbed during construction. The plan must describe activities that could emit lead, methods for complying with the standard, safe work practices, and a plan to protect workers from exposure to lead during construction activities. Cal/OSHA requires 24-hour notification if more than 100 square feet of lead-based paint would be disturbed. 2M3MMnMWM= California has developed an emergency response plan to coordinate emergency services provided by federal, state, and local government, and private agencies. Responding to hazardous materials incidents is one part of this plan. The plan is administered by the State Office of Emergency Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.5-12 ESA / D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Seat i1g, lmtracls, and Mitigation Measures ® _ .. _ 3 5 Hazards and Hazardous Ml.aerials Services (OES), which coordinates the responses of other agencies, including the California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA), CHP, the California Department of Fish and Game, the RWQCB, and the local fire department. The Los Angeles County Fire Department provides first response capabilities, if needed, for hazardous materials emergencies within the Specific Plan area. Utility Notification Requirements Title 8, Section 1541 of the CCR requires excavators to determine the approximate locations of subsurface installations such as sewer, telephone, fuel, electric, and water lines (or any other subsurface installations that may reasonably be encountered during excavation work) prior to opening an excavation. The California Government Code (Section 4216 et seq.) requires owners and operators of underground utilities to become members of and participate in a regional notification center. According to Section 4216. 1, operators of subsurface installations who are members of, participate in, and share in the costs of a regional notification center are in compliance with this section of the code. Underground Services Alert of Southern California (known as DigAlert) receives planned excavation reports from public and private excavators and transmits those reports to all participating members of DigAlert that may have underground facilities at the location of excavation. Members will mark or stake their facilities, provide information, or give clearance to dig (digalert 2014). Local City of Baldwin Park General Plan—Safety Element The primary purpose of the Safety Element is to identify and assess natural and human -made safety hazards and then minimize their danger to life and property. Goals and policies relevant to the proposed Specific Plan are listed below: Goal 3: To reduce accidents and health risks associated with use, storage, handling, and disposal of hazardous materials. Policy 3.1: Locate land uses involved in production, storage, transportation, handling and/or disposal of hazardous materials a safe distance from other land uses that might be adversely affected by such activities. Policy 3.2: Encourage and support the proper disposal of hazardous waste and waste oil. Monitor dry cleaners, film processors, auto service establishments, and other businesses generating hazardous waste materials to ensure compliance with approved disposal procedures. Policy 3.3: Vigorously prosecute unlicensed dumping of toxic or hazardous materials into the ground or water in Baldwin Park. Encourage citizens to report dumping when they observe it. Policy 3.4: Coordinate with Los Angeles County in sponsoring regular hazardous waste disposal programs to enable residents to bring backyard pesticides, cleaning fluids, paint cans, Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.5-13 ESA / D1 30593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3, Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures Hazardous Material 3 5 Hazards and Ha __ Materials and other common household toxics to a centralized collection center for proper disposal. 3.5.3 Thresholds of Significance In accordance with Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, a project could have a significant hazard or hazardous materials impact if it would result in any of the following: • Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials; • Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment; • Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school; • Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would create a significant hazard to the public or the environment; • For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not yet been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area; • For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area; • Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan; or • Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands. It was determined in the NOP/Initial Study (Appendix A) that implementation of the proposed Specific Plan would not result in significant impacts related to airport and airstrip related hazards, or wildland fires. Additionally, no public comments were received during the 30 -day NOP/Initial Study public scoping period that indicated new evidence to analyze these thresholds in this EIR. Therefore, no further analysis of these topics is included in the EIR. 3.5.4 Methodology To identify previous land uses in the Specific Plan area, historical aerial photographs were reviewed. In addition, to determine if hazardous waste sites exist in the Specific Plan area, a search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) in November 2014. Regulatory agency lists reviewed during the records search include: Federal Superfund (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency National Priorities List (NPL)); Federal Delisted NPL site list; Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.5-14 ESA / D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures m....... .........,,, —._ 3.5 Hazards and Hazardous Materials and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) list; Federal CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned (NFRAP) site list; Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Corrective Action Report (CORRACTS) facilities list; Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS treatment, storage and disposal facilities list; Federal RCRA generators list; Federal Institutional controls/engineering controls registries; Federal Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS); State and Tribal Response Sites; State and Tribal Leaking Storage Tank lists; State and Tribal Voluntary Cleanup Sites; local Brownfield lists; Local Lists of Landfill/Solid Waste Disposal Sites; Local Lists of Hazardous Waste/Contaminated Sites; Local Land Records; and high risk historical records. Additionally, the Regional Water Quality Control Board's (RWQCB) GeoTracker database and the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) EnviroStor Data Management System were reviewed for the Specific .Plan area. The GeoTracker database operated by the RWQCB is the Water Boards' data management system for managing sites that impact groundwater, especially those that require groundwater cleanup as well as permitted facilities such as operating Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) and land disposal sites. DTSC's EnviroStor Data Management System provides all existing information on permits and corrective action at hazardous waste facilities, as well as cleanup projects. 3.5.5 Impact Analysis Impact 3.5-1: Implementation of the project could create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. Implementation of the proposed project would result in an increase in development intensity within the Specific Plan area. Proposed uses include: civic, retail, residential, and open space. Exposure of the public or the environment to hazardous materials could occur by improper handling or use of hazardous materials or hazardous wastes; transportation accident; environmentally unsound disposal methods; or fire, explosion or other emergencies. The severity of potential effects varies with the activity conducted, the amount, concentration of and type of hazardous material or wastes present, and the proximity of sensitive receptors. The types and amounts of hazardous materials that would be generated or used at build out of the Specific Plan would vary according to the nature of the activity at individual development sites, but would mostly consist of typical cleaning products, maintenance products (e.g., paints and solvents), oils, lubricants and refrigerants, associated with building mechanical and HVAC systems; and grounds and landscape maintenance products formulated with hazardous substances, including fuels, cleaners and degreasers, solvents, paints, lubricants, adhesives, sealers, and pesticides/herbicides that are used by residential and commercial land uses. The Specific Plan area is urban and developed with commercial and residential uses, mass transit routes, and commercial uses. Implementation of the Specific Plan would increase commercial uses such as retail and office, but would not increase industrial uses in the Specific Plan area. Therefore, when compared to the current uses and levels of generation, the future commercial and residential uses developed under the Specific Plan would not substantially increase the amount of Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.5-15 ESA / D1 30593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures .... .....__ ,......,,,, 3,5 Hazards and Hazardous Materials hazardous materials and/or waste brought to, or generated in, the Specific Plan area. Furthermore, use and storage of hazardous material is regulated by federal, state, and local regulations (listed above) to reduce the potential consequence of hazardous materials accidents during their routine use. Therefore, implementation of the Specific Plan build out would not substantially increase the use or storage of hazardous materials and compliance with applicable regulations would reduce the risk of project -induced upset from hazardous materials to a less than significant level for future uses that could be developed under the proposed Specific Plan. Transportation of Hazardous Materials The U.S. Department Of Transportation (DOT) Office of Hazardous Materials Safety prescribes strict regulations for the safe transportation of hazardous materials, as described in CFR Titles 40, 42, 45, and 49 and implemented by CCR Titles 17, 19, and 27. The transportation of hazardous materials can result in accidental spills, leaks, toxic releases, fire, or explosion. The types of hazardous materials that could be present during operation of the commercial and residential uses under the proposed Specific Plan are expected to include household cleaning and maintenance products, pesticides and herbicides, paints, solvents and degreasers. The Specific Plan provides for an increase in commercial uses such as office and retail, but would not increase industrial uses in the Specific Plan area. Therefore, when compared to the current uses and levels of generation, it is unlikely that future commercial uses developed under the Specific Plan would substantially increase the amount of hazardous materials and/or waste transported to or from the Specific Plan area. During construction of future development projects under the proposed Specific Plan, hazardous materials in the form of paints, solvents, glues, roofing materials, and other common construction materials containing toxic substances may be transported to individual sites, and construction waste that possibly contains hazardous materials would be transported off the site for purposes of disposal. Appropriate documentation for all hazardous waste that is transported off site in connection with activities at individual sites (such as disposal of asbestos or building materials containing lead-based paint) would be provided as required by existing regulations to ensure compliance with the existing hazardous materials regulations described above. Adherence to these regulations, which requires compliance with all applicable federal and state laws related to the transportation of hazardous materials, would reduce the likelihood and severity of accidents that might occur during transit, reducing potential impacts to a level that is less than significant. Disposal of Hazardous Waste Construction of new development under the proposed Specific Plan may generate hazardous and/or toxic waste depending on the age and contents of structures to be demolished or renovated, or other potential soil or groundwater contamination based on previous uses. Federal, state, and local regulations govern the disposal of wastes identified as hazardous that could be produced in the course of demolition and construction. Asbestos, lead, or other hazardous materials encountered during demolition or construction activities would be disposed of in compliance with all applicable regulations for the handling of such waste, which are described above, reducing the potential impacts of disposal of site -generated hazardous wastes to a level that is less than significant. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.5-16 ESA / D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures ----- ......... _ ......... . _ 3.5 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Mitigation Measures: No mitigation required Significance Determination: Less than significant Impact 3.5-2: Implementation of the project could create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. Accidental spills of small quantities of hazardous materials during construction activities (i.e., motor fuels, oils, solvents, lubricants) related to implementation of the Specific Plan could expose the public or the environment to such substances in the event of an accidental release. Development activities that occur within Specific Plan area would be required to adhere to all applicable regulations regarding hazardous materials storage and handling, as well as to implement construction best management practices (BMPs) as described in Section 3.6, Hydrology and Water Quality to prevent such a release and to promptly contain and clean up any spills. Similarly, the storage, handling and disposal of diesel fuel, lubricants, and gas for project operations would be subject to regulations that would minimize the potential for harmful exposures. With compliance to existing laws and regulations, the project's construction related impacts would be less than significant. As implementation of the proposed Specific Plan would primarily result in urban infill and redevelopment with mixed -uses, existing structures would need to be demolished prior to the construction of some new buildings. Due to the age of the buildings within the Specific Plan area, demolition of existing structures could result in exposure of construction personnel and the public to hazardous substances such as asbestos, PCBs, or lead-based paints. In addition, the disturbance of soils could result in the exposure of construction workers or nearby employees to health or safety risks if contaminated soils are encountered during construction.Asbestos and Lead -Based Paint Based on the age of some of the buildings within the Specific Plan area, it is likely that some materials containing lead and asbestos are present. Affected buildings would need appropriate abatement of identified asbestos prior to demolition or renovation. Federal and state regulations govern the renovation and demolition of structures where materials containing lead and asbestos are present. AGMs are regulated both as a hazardous air pollutant under the Clean Air Act and as a potential worker safety hazard under the authority of Cal OSHA. These requirements include SCAQMD Rules and Regulations pertaining to asbestos abatement (including Rule 1403); Construction Safety Orders 1529 (pertaining to asbestos) and 1532.1 (pertaining to lead) from CCR Title 8; CFR Title 40, Part 61, Subpart M (pertaining to asbestos); and lead exposure guidelines provided by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Asbestos and lead abatement must be performed and monitored by contractors with appropriate certifications from the California Department of Health Services. In addition, Cal/OSHA has regulations concerning the use of hazardous materials, including requirements for safety training, availability of safety equipment, hazardous materials exposure warnings, and emergency action and fire prevention plan preparation. Cal/OSHA enforces the hazard communication program Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.5-17 ESA / D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3, Environmental Setting. Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3 5 Hazards and Hazardous Materials regulations, which include provisions for identifying and labeling hazardous materials, describing the hazards of chemicals, and documenting employee -training programs. All demolition that could result in the release of lead and/or asbestos must be conducted according to Cal/OSHA standards. Adherence to existing regulations would ensure that potential impacts related to ACMs and would be less than significant. PCB -containing Materials The presence of PCB -containing materials may be present within the existing structures in the Specific Plan area. Demolition of these structures could disturb these materials and expose workers or the public to adverse effects. Similar to the concerns of asbestos containing materials, an initial survey to determine the presence of PCBs would need to be conducted for a construction/demolition site followed by implementation of appropriate measures to handle any materials with PCBs. Generally, the majority of PCB containing electrical transformers has been abated of PCBs. For the isolated locations where PCBs remain, appropriate identification and removal work will be required according to federal and state standards. PCBs are managed under the federal and state regulations listed previously. Adherence to the regulatory requirements will reduce potential impacts related to PCBs to a less than significant level. Soil and Groundwater Contamination Unknown Contaminated Sites The Specific Plan area currently contains properties that store, generate, and/or dispose of hazardous materials. While each known soil and/or groundwater contamination site has been remediated or is in the process of remediation, it is possible that implementation of infill projects within the Specific Plan area could expose unknown soil contamination during construction activities. If any unidentified sources of contamination are encountered during grading or excavation, the removal activities could pose health and safety risks such as the exposure of workers, materials handling personnel, and the public to hazardous materials or vapors. Such contamination could cause various short-term or long-term adverse health effects in persons exposed to the hazardous substances. If exposed to hazardous substances, this would result in a significant hazard to the public. It is also possible that old USTs that were in use prior to permitting and record keeping requirements may be present in the Specific Plan area. If an unidentified UST were uncovered or disturbed during construction activities, it woul&be closed in place or .removed. Removal activities could pose both health and safety risks, such as the exposure of workers, tank handling personnel, and the public to tank contents or vapors. Potential risks, if any, posed by USTs would be minimized by managing the tank according to existing state and local regulations. Because of the age of buildings within the Specific Plan area and because the area has been identified as having hazardous waste producers, a variety of potential sources of contamination, including various forms of chemical waste, cleaners, auto -repair facilities, and gas stations exist within the area. However, any new development activities that identify undocumented hazardous materials would be required to remediate and cleanup under the regulations and supervision of the DTSC and/or the RWQCB. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.5-18 ESA / D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 3.5 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Known Soil and/or groundwater Contamination As listed above, several sites within the Specific Plan area have been identified as being hazardous waste produces and/or a source of contamination. Currently, there is one property, McDaniels Cleaners, 14238 Ramona Boulevard, which is under remediation. In addition, two LUST sites within the Specific Plan area maintain a Completed — Case Closed status. Any new developments that identify undocumented contamination would be required to be remediated and cleaned up under the regulations and supervision of the DTSC and/or the RWQCB, which would reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. Operation Development under the proposed Specific Plan would involve residential and commercial uses, and would include the use of and storage of common hazardous materials such as paints, solvents, and cleaning products. Additionally, building mechanical systems and grounds and landscape maintenance could also use a variety of products formulated with hazardous materials, including fuels, cleaners, lubricants, adhesives, sealers, and pesticides/herbicides. The properties and health effects of different chemicals are unique to each chemical and depend on the extent to which an individual is exposed. The extent and exposure of individuals to hazardous materials would be limited by the relatively small quantities of these materials that would be stored and used on individual project sites throughout the Specific Plan area. Any business or facility which uses, generates, processes, produces, packages, treats, stores, emits, discharges, or disposes a hazardous material (or waste) is a handler and may require a hazardous materials handler permit if the amount of material is above threshold amounts. Any business that handles a hazardous material and/or hazardous waste of quantities at any one time during a year equal to, or greater than a total volume of 55 gallons, a total weight of 500 pounds, or 200 cubic feet of a compressed gas is a hazardous materials handler and must report Owner/Operator, Business Activities, Inventory, Site Map, and Emergency Response and Contingency Plan and Employee Training Plan information in the California Environmental Reporting System (CERS). Through future development under the proposed Specific Plan, hazardous materials could be stored within the Specific Plan area; however the materials would generally be in the form of routinely used common chemicals. All hazardous materials would be used and stored in accordance with applicable regulations and such uses would be required to comply with federal and state laws to reduce the potential consequences of hazardous materials accidents. As a result, implementation of the proposed Specific Plan would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment, and impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation required Significance Determination: Less than significant Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.5-19 ESA / D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3, Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures "I'll 1x11.. m 3,5 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Impact 3.5-3: Implementation of the project could result in the handling of hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school. There are no schools located within the Specific Plan area; however, there are four schools located within one-quarter mile of the Specific Plan area including: St. John the Baptist School, Central Elementary School, Baldwin Park High School, and Vineland Elementary School. As described previously, common hazardous materials could be used in the construction and operation of new development in the Specific Plan area, including use of standard construction materials (e.g., paints, solvents, and fuels), cleaning and other maintenance products, diesel and other fuels (used in construction and maintenance equipment and vehicles), and pesticides associated with landscaping around new developments. The project would not include industrial uses. None of these materials would result in hazardous emissions or are considered acutely hazardous. The routine use, transport, and disposal of hazardous materials that would occur with implementation of the Specific Plan would be subject to the wide range of laws and regulations that are described above, which are intended to minimize potential health risks associated with their use or the accidental release of such substances. Compliance with existing regulations would minimize the risks associated with the exposure of sensitive receptors, including schools, to hazardous materials to a less than significant level. Therefore, future development under the proposed plan would result in a less -than -significant impact related to the emissions or handling of hazardous materials within the vicinity of schools. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation required Significance Determination: Less than significant hupact 3.5-4: The: project area atad individaaal sites within the project area are included on a list of hazardous materials sites compile pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. The Project area is underlain by a plume of contaminated groundwater known as the San Gabriel Valley (Area 2) Baldwin Park National Priorities List. The 19 identified Potentially Responsible Parties are ultimately responsible for funding the design; construction, and operation of groundwater cleanup facilities. The California Department of Health Services approved the design and oversees the operation of four Baldwin Park water treatment systems. Because the contamination is being remediated and is located approximately 196 feet below ground it does not present a potential health or safety risk to the project or its users. McDaniels Cleaners, located at 14238 Ramona Boulevard, is within an Opportunity Site, and is listed on SWRCB's GeoTracker database as a Cleanup Program Site with a cleanup status of Open -Inactive as of November 3, 2014. The Open -Inactive status means no regulatory oversight activities are being conducted by the Lead Agency. A leak of VOCs that affected the aquifer used for drinking water supply was reported in January, 1965. Additionally, the site is listed as public Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.5-20 ESA / D13059 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3, Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures ......... m ......... ......._ ..,_ ..__.... ......... 3.5 Hazards and Hazardous Materials participation category 1, or sites that are characterized by soil or groundwater contamination that does not pose an immediate human health threat and does not extend off-site onto neighboring properties. As a result, this site does not present a potential health or safety risk. Two previous LUST cleanup sites that have closed cases are located within the Specific Plan area. These sites include a gas station, Thrifty #293, at 4258 N. Maine Avenue, and the City of Baldwin Park City Hall, at 14403 E. Pacific Avenue. No other LUST, land disposal sites, military sites, or other cleanup sites have been identified within the Specific Plan area. Since the one site on the Cortese List is being remediated per federal and state regulations and oversight, and has been determined to not pose an immediate human health threat, impact to public safety and the environment from implementation of the proposed Specific Plan would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation required Significance Determination: Less than significant Impact 3.5-7: The proposed Specific Plan would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. The Baldwin Park General Plan Public Safety Element Figure PS -4 illustrates emergency evacuation routes. These routes include Ramona Boulevard and Pacific Avenue south of Ramona Boulevard, which are located within the Specific Plan area. Implementation of the Specific Plan would expand and improve circulation within Ramona Boulevard, to provide a boulevard that serves vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle transportation modes. The Specific Plan would also improve circulation on Main Avenue at Pacific Avenue and Sterling Way. The Baldwin Park Multi -hazard Functional Plan and the Baldwin Park Emergency Preparedness Plan outline emergency response actions in the event of a hazardous materials emergency. Construction activities that may temporarily restrict vehicular traffic would be required to implement adequate measures to facilitate the passage of people and vehicles through/around any required road closures. Site-specific activities such as temporary construction activities would be reviewed on a project -by -project basis by the City and are formulated when development plans are submitted to the City. Development implemented by the Specific Plan would conform to applicable California Building Code and Uniform Fire Code, which would be verified through the City's review process for each project. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Specific Plan would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan, and impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation required Significance Determination: Less than significant Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.5-21 ESA ( D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3 Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures -- ._....._ ......... 3 5 Hazards and Hazardous Materials As described above, the project would result in a less -than -significant hazardous materials impact to the public or the environment. Hazardous material impacts typically occur in a local or site- specific context versus a cumulative context combined with other development projects; although it is possible for combined effects of transporting and disposal of hazardous materials to be affected by adjacent cumulative development. The scope of analysis for cumulative impacts associated with accidental spills, releases, or explosions of hazardous materials encompasses the Specific Plan vicinity. As listed in Table 2-6 in Chapter 2, Project Description, only two are within the Specific Plan area and no others are not in the immediate vicinity of the Specific Plan area. As a result, there limited potential that a hazardous event within the Specific Plan would result in cumulative impacts. Implementation of the proposed Specific Plan would increase development, which has the potential to contribute to cumulative impacts from hazards and hazardous materials through the additional transport, storage, use, or handling of hazardous materials. Most of the past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects in the area include residential, commercial, civic, open space, and commuter rail uses. Many of these may use, handle, store, and/or transport hazardous materials. However, each past, present, and foreseeable future project must comply with all existing hazardous material regulations, which are in place to reduce the potential effects of accidental releases of hazardous materials. Although projects cannot completely eliminate the probability associated with an accidental release of a hazardous material, the existing regulations reduce the overall probability and minimize the impacts during a release. As described above, some types of hazardous materials would be used and/or removed during demolition and construction activities and hazardous materials would be needed for potential fueling and servicing construction equipment on construction sites. Operation of the proposed land uses proposed in the Specific Plan (residential, retail, and open space) and cumulative projects that are of a similar character and intensity, generally use hazardous materials including solvents, cleaning agents, paints, pesticides, batteries, and aerosol cans. Although the land uses developed under the Specific Plan and cumulative projects would utilize common types of hazardous materials, normal routine use of these products would not result in a significant hazard to residents or workers. As a result, hazards and hazardous materials impacts would be less than significant and would not be cumulatively considerable. Therefore, past, present, and foreseeable future projects in combination with the proposed Specific Plan project would not result in hazards and hazardous materials impacts that are cumulatively considerable. Significance Determination: Less than cumulatively considerable Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.5-22 ESA / D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 3.5 Hazards and Hazardous s Materials _ • I • toLei California Environmental, Preliminary Site Assessment — Phase I, Baldwin Park Redevelopment Project, Baldwin Park, California, May 2007. California Department of Toxic Substances Control. EnviroStor. http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ California Environmental Protection Agency, Use of California Human Health Screening Levels (CHHSLs) in Evaluation of Contaminated Properties, January 2005. California State Water Resources Control Board, Geotracker, URL: ov/. 2014. City of Baldwin Park, Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan, November 20, 2002. DigalertI1i1IT.I vw� y.altg,zt tlaa;ll;t�,tatte.Ntlt71. 2014. Los Angeles County Fire Department, Health Hazardous Materials Division, Los Angeles County Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA), Site Mitigation, http://fire.lacounty.gov/HealthHazMat/HHNMSiteMitigation.asp, accessed March 27, 2008. Rincon. City of Baldwin Park, Baldwin Park Transit Center Apartment Project Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration. December 2013. U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Frequently Asked Questions: HAZWOPER, http://www.osha.gov/html/faq-hazwoper.html, accessed April 1, 2008. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9: Superfund, Superfund Site Overview, San Gabriel Valley (Area 2) Baldwin Park, URL:http://yosemite.epa.gov/r9/sfund/r9sfdocw.nsf, updated May 8, 2007. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2011. CERCLA Overview. URL: lttil //Irvvvw+J ,t. 9ov/stat er°Iia1�,,1rtao i /c tt 2011. SARA Overview. URL:tft� 2013. Waste — Wastes Laws and Regulations, History of RCRA. URL:httt :1/ww�v.c Warov/e: twast:r/lrtws-rc:, is/tt.wL litslor 2014. Summary of the Toxic Substances Control Act. URL: l1N1nal- y -toxic- substances- mcontrol- act Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.5-23 ESA ! D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3, Environmental Setting. Impacts and Mitigation Measures Introduction This section describes existing hydrological conditions within the Specific Plan area and discusses potential project -related impacts to water quality, groundwater, storm water runoff and flooding. Surface Water Hydrology Regional Drainage The Specific Plan area is located within the San Gabriel River Watershed, which covers more than 640 square miles and includes portions of 37 cities in Los Angeles and Orange Counties, as well as unincorporated communities in Los Angeles County. More than one-third of the upper watershed falls within the Angeles National Forest, including significant portions of the San Gabriel Mountains. The watershed includes the Merced Hills, San Jose Hills, and the Puente - Chino Hills; the major urban populations of the San Gabriel and Pomona Valleys; and the coastal plain of the Los Angeles Basin. About 26 percent of the watershed's total area is developed with urban and related land uses. The watershed consists of 22 creeks, washes and streams located within four major sub -watersheds: Upper San Gabriel River including the East, West and North Forks; Walnut Creek; San Jose Creek and Coyote -Carbon Creek (Moore, 2006). The Specific Plan area is located within the Walnut Creek subwatershed. There are three waterbodies in the subwatershed that ultimately receive stormwater drainage from the Specific Plan area. This includes Big Dalton Wash, which is located approximately 0.2 mile southwest of the Specific Plan area and flows southeast to its confluence with Walnut Creek just below Interstate 10 (I-10) (San Bernardino Freeway). About three miles southwest of the Specific Plan area and west of Interstate 605, Walnut Creek flows into Reach 3 of the San Gabriel River (spanning from Ramona Boulevard to the Whittier Narrows Dam) (See Figure 3.6-1). Local Drainage The only water body with flows in the vicinity of the Specific Plan area is Big Dalton Wash, which flows northeast to southeast within a concrete -lined channel. The Specific Plan area is a developed and urbanized area, occupied by residential, commercial, retail, and industrial land uses. More than ninety percent of the existing Specific Plan area is impervious surfaces (Baldwin Park, 2014). The ground surface is nearly level, sloping gently from the 400 feet above mean sea level (amsl) in the northeast to the 300 feet amsl in southwest towards the San Gabriel River. Stormwater run-off from the Specific Plan area sheet flows across impervious surfaces and is collected by curbs and gutters and conveyed through drop inlets to subterranean storm drains consisting of reinforced concrete piping (RCP) and culverts, and is described below and shown on Figure 3.6-1. Baldwin Park T �. OD Specific Plan Project 3.6-1 ESA I D206366 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3.6 drology and Water Quality Ramona Boulevard: A 36 -inch storm drain pipe is located within Ramona Boulevard from the east of the Specific Plan boundary and extends west and southwest on to Downing Street crossing Badillo Street, where it increases in size to 39 inches. In addition, a 48 -inch storm drain pipe is located within the east bound lane of Ramona Boulevard, from Maine Avenue to just west of Baldwin Park Boulevard, where it increases in size to a 63 -inch pipe that continues west past the western boundary of the Specific Plan area. Maine Avenue: A 24 -inch storm drain pipe is located within Main Avenue and begins from the north side of Clark Street and increases in size to a 42 -inch pipe at the south side of Clark Street. This storm drain continues south on the east side of the Maine Avenue until it reaches a manhole just north of Palm Avenue, where it increases to a 48 -inch storm drain and continues south to Ramona Boulevard. Downing Avenue: A 39 -inch storm drain is located in Downing Avenue from Ramona Boulevard to the southwest to a manhole near 3876 Downing Avenue, where it increases in size to a 48 -inch storm drain and continues to the southwest until just west of Pacific Avenue where it increases to a 54 -inch storm drain and continues on to Pacific Avenue, and increases in size to a 63 -inch storm drain. Pacific Avenue: A 54 -inch storm drain is located within Pacific Avenue from Downing Avenue and extends to the southeast past the Specific Plan boundary (Cruikshank, 2014). The storm drain running along Ramona Parkway and Downing Avenue drains the eastern half of the Specific Plan area, discharging into Big Dalton Wash approximately 0.2 miles southeast of the Specific Plan area. The western half of the Specific Plan area conveys stormwater through a storm drain that runs along Main Avenue and Ramona Parkway and discharges into Walnut Creek, which is approximately two miles southwest of the Specific Plan area, as shown in Figure 3.6-1 (Los Angeles County, 2015). Water Quality The Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) assigns various existing, intermittent and potential beneficial uses to the water bodies within its jurisdiction; water quality objectives are then implemented to ensure the protection of these beneficial uses. Beneficial uses for the receiving water bodies of the Specific Plan area are shown below in Table 3.6-1. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.6-2 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 I 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures ......... 3.6 Hydrology and Water Quality TABLE 3.6-1 BENEFICIAL USES OF WATER BODIES IN THE VICINITY OF THE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA Specific Plan Area & Water Body RECREATION -1 RECREATION -2 MUNICIPAL GROUNDWATER WARM WILD SpocGtic Plan Befleflt Nr Area .. Big Dalton Wash P E P Walnut Creek I V P San Gabriel River Reach 3 (Whittier i I P Narrows Dam to Ramona Blvd) E: Exlsf ng benef dal use P: Pofantiail heneficdl use action would require a detailed analysis of the area. I: Intermittent beneficial use E,P, and I: shall be protected as required. SOURCE: LARWQCB, 2011; SWRCB, 2011. C Section 303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act (CWA) requires states to identify water bodies that are "impaired," or those that do not meet water quality standards and are not supporting their beneficial uses. Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) are then designed to serve as pollution control plans for these specific pollutants. As shown in Table 3.6-2, Reach 3 of the San Gabriel River is impaired with indicator bacteria, and Walnut Creek is impaired for indicator bacteria, pH and benthic-macroinvertebrate bioassessments. No TMDLs have been developed for these impairments (SWRCB, 2011). TABLE 3.6-2 TMDLS FOR WATER BODIES IN THE VICINITY OF THE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA "Although these TMDL dates have passed, no TMDLs have been established. SOURCE: LARWQCB, 2011. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.6-5 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report Aprll 2015 Expected TMDL Reach Impairment(s) Source(s) Completion Date(s) Walnut Creek Indicator bacteria Unknown 2021 Macroinvertebrate Unknown 2012" bloassessnlenis pH Point and nonpoint 2007" San Gabriel River Reach 3 lnd'lcator bacteria Unknown 2021 (Whittier Narrows Dam to Ramona Blvd) "Although these TMDL dates have passed, no TMDLs have been established. SOURCE: LARWQCB, 2011. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.6-5 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report Aprll 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures .,, 3.6 Hydrology and Water Quality The Main San Gabriel Groundwater Basin (Basin) underlies most of the San Gabriel Valley, including the Specific Plan area; it is bounded by the San Gabriel Mountains to the north, San Jose Hills to the east, Puente Hills to the south, and by a series of hills and the Raymond Fault to the west (Main San Gabriel Basin Watermaster, 2015). Groundwater recharge in the Basin occurs via stream run-off from the adjacent mountains and hills, by rainfall directly on the surface of the valley floor, from subsurface inflow from neighboring groundwater basins, and by return flow from water applied for irrigation and other overlying uses. Additionally, the Basin is replenishedt with imported water that is delivered through flood control channels to spreading grounds and recharged into the Basin for use as supplemental water supplies (Civiltec Engineering, Inc., 2008). The Basin was adjudicated2 in 1973 and is managed by the Main San Gabriel Basin Watermaster (Basin Watermaster), which provides for maintaining a balance between outflow and inflow of water supplies. The Basin Watermaster consists of a nine -member board involved in all aspects of the operation and management of the groundwater basin, including determination of annual operating safe yield and administration of specific basin operating criteria regarding limitations on the storage of supplemental water supplies. The Main San Gabriel Basin Judgement of 1973 allows for overproduction of water rights and does not restrict the quantity of water which parties may extract from the Basin. Rather, it provides a means for replacing all annual extractions in excess of a party's annual right to extract water through replenishment and storage using imported supplies (Civiltec Engineering, Inc., 2008). Groundwater contamination as a result of past land uses has been an issue in the San Gabriel Valley for more than 20 years. As described in Section 3.6, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, the City of Baldwin Park lies within the San Gabriel Valley (Area 2) NPL site. The NPL contains the nation's highest priority sites for cleanup. Portions of the Basin have been contaminated from numerous sources within the 170 -square -mile San Gabriel Valley. The most prevalent contaminants in groundwater are trichloroethene (TCE), perchloroethylene (PCE), carbon tetrachloride, perchlorate, and N-nitrosodimethylamine (MDMA). The results of an environmental records search identified 11 sites within the Specific Plan area that are on regulatory agency lists of known or possible soil or groundwater contamination sites. These sites include the following: one regional plume of groundwater contamination; four properties that have known impacts to soil or groundwater due to current or former underground storage tanks (USTs) or aboveground storage tanks (ASTs); and 10 facilities that generate, use, or store hazardous materials (EDR, 2014). Groundwater i•e°palenishrrie:.nt re.l urs to groundwater Iraanageruent teclinique s that involve adding waterto a grouatdwalcr systeaa to redUce° the inipaicts of overdrafts, when withdr awval s exceed natural recharge. In the Main San Gabriel abriel Baasin, groundwater tv p m llyr ilavc&ew spreading aanported surface water, Mor rn water and recycled water over laarge areas ole lanai, or in putts, furrows, ditches, and sircaartt Channels, and adtoMng the water to per eoltat:o il%a tlle groltttrd, e l ie ctively storing it thea; for later use. Aaler a. lawsuit is iraitiartcd to rrdlardicatc a groaundwaate;r Nsin, the wort decides the groun(hvaterrightrs of"all the ove,j liers arrial iap larolsi ratrrr' a:rad appoints a wvate^rmaastwr. Hic wvate nrl aster serves as the gover wrient re,prvscntaative responsible, for atdrniini ste,ring the detaih, of the, adjtrdication in a basin pursuant to the provisions of the court order. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.6-6 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures ---- ® ......— 3.6 Hydrology and Water Quality To clean up groundwater contamination in the area, four "pump and treat" (i.e., groundwater extraction and treatment) facilities have been built with a combined treatment capacity of 26,000 gallons per minute, equivalent to 37 million gallons per day. Water utilities in the area have continued to provide their customers with clean water by blending, obtaining water from neighboring utilities, and installing wellhead treatment systems (USEPA, October 2014). The Valley County Water District, which is the water provider for the Specific Plan area, obtains approximately 73 percent of its total water supply from the Basin (Civiltec, 2011). Depth to groundwater in the vicinity of the Specific Plan area is approximately 194 feet below the ground surface (bgs) (DWR, 2013). Therefore, exposure to contaminated groundwater does not occur. Clean Water Act The Clean Water Act (CWA) established the basic structure for regulating discharges of pollutants into "waters of the U.S." The act specifies a variety of regulatory and non -regulatory tools to sharply reduce direct pollutant discharges into waterways, finance municipal wastewater treatment facilities, and manage polluted runoff. Key components of the CWA are: • Sections 303 and 304, which provide for water quality standards, criteria, and guidelines. Under Section 303(d) of the CWA, states are required to develop lists of water bodies that would not attain water quality objectives after implementation of required levels of treatment by point -source dischargers (municipalities and industries). Section 303(d) requires that the state develop a TMDL for each of the listed pollutants. The TMDL is the amount of pollutant loading that the water body can receive and still be in compliance with water quality objectives. After implementation of the TMDL, it is anticipated that the problems that led to placement of a given pollutant on the Section 303(d) list would be remediated. In California, preparation and management of the Section 303(d) list is administered by the RWQCBs. Section 401 requires every applicant for a federal permit or license for any activity that may result in a discharge to a water body to obtain a water quality certification that the proposed activity would comply with applicable water quality standards. Section 402 regulates point- and nonpoint-source discharges to surface waters through the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. In California, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRC13) oversees the NPDES program, which is administered by the RWQCBs. The NPDES program provides for both general permits (those that cover a number of similar or related activities) and individual permits„ Section 404 of the CWA establishes a program to regulate the discharge of dredged and fill material into waters of the U.S., including some wetlands. Activities in waters of the U.S. that are regulated under this program include fills for development, water resource ......... -- 53 Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.6-7 ESA / D1309 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3.Environmental Setting Impacts and Mitigation Measures ......... 3 6 Hydrology and Water Quality projects (e.g., dams and levees), infrastructure development (e.g., highways and airports), and conversion of wetlands to uplands for farming and forestry. State Porter -Cologne Water Quality Control Act The Porter -Cologne Water Quality Control Act (Water Code Sections 13000 et seq.), passed in 1969, requires protection of water quality by appropriate design, sizing, and construction of erosion and sediment controls. The Porter -Cologne Act established the SWRCB and divided California into nine regions, each overseen by a RWQCB. The SWRCB is the primary state agency responsible for protecting the quality of the state's surface and groundwater supplies and has delegated primary implementation authority to the nine RWQCBs. The Porter -Cologne Act assigns responsibility for implementing CWA Sections 401 through 402 and 303(d) to the SWRCB and the nine RWQCBs. The Porter -Cologne Act requires the development and periodic review of water quality control plans (Basin Plans) that designate beneficial uses of California's major rivers and groundwater basins and establish narrative and numerical water quality objectives for those waters, provide the technical basis for determining waste discharge requirements, identify enforcement actions, and evaluate clean water grant proposals. Compliance with basin plans is primarily achieved through implementation of the NPDES, which regulates waste discharges. The Porter -Cologne Water Quality Control Act requires that any person discharging waste or proposing to discharge waste within any region, other than to a community sewer system, which could affect the quality of the "waters of the state," file a report of waste discharge (ROWD). This report requires a complete characterization of the discharge including design and actual flows, a list of constituents and the discharge concentration of each constituent, a list of other appropriate waste discharge characteristics, a description and schematic drawing of all treatment processes, a description of any best management practices (BMPs) used, and a description of disposal methods, and a site map. Construction General Permit The State of California adopted a Statewide NPDES Permit for General Construction Activity (Construction General Permit) on September 2, 2009 (Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ, as amended by 2010-0014-DWQ and 2012-0006-DWQ). The last Construction General Permit amendment became effective on February 16, 2012. The Construction General Permit regulates construction site storm water management. Dischargers whose projects disturb one or more acres of soil, or whose projects disturb less than one acre but are part of a larger common plan of development that in total disturbs one or more acres, are required to obtain coverage under the general permit for discharges of storm water associated with construction activity. Construction activity subject to this permit includes clearing, grading, and disturbances to the ground, such as stockpiling or excavation, but does not include regular maintenance activities performed to restore the original line, grade, or capacity of the facility. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.6-8 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3, Environmental Setting. Impacts and Mitigation Measures .. . . -1 ................ ..... . . ........ . .. ....... . — -- "I'll . . ................ . ...... . . ...... - 3,6 Hydrology and Water Quality To obtain coverage under this permit, project operators must electronically file Permit Registration Documents, which include a Notice oflntellt, a,] Storill Water Polhitiotl Prevelitioll Plan (SWFIIIP), and utlicr compliance -related dociiiiietits, iiicllidiiig a risk-levot assessi-TiciA fiat` construction sites, an active storm water effluent moiiikofing ami reporting pl-ogram doritig construction, rain event action plans, and numeric action levels (NALs) for pH and turbidity as well as requirements for qualified professionals to prepare and implement the plan. An appropriate permit fee must also be mailed to SVvRCB. The Construction General Permit requires the SVv1PPP to identify BMPs that will be implemented to reduce controlling potential chemical contaminants from impacting water quality. Types of BMPs include erosion control (e.g., preservation of vegetation), sediment control (e.g., fiber rolls), non-stormwater management (e.g., water conservation), and waste management. The SWPPP also includes descriptions of BMPs to reduce pollutants in storm water discharges after all construction phases have been completed at the site (post -construction BMPs). Senate Bill 610 Pursuant to California Senate Bill (SB) 610, which became effective January 1, 2002 and amends Sections 10910-10915 of the CWC, counties and cities are required to consider the availability of �e deve[opnient projects, A project is subject to SB 610 adequate w�alerstipplics for certain iww larL ,irid is subseclLiently required to prepare a WSA if the project Illeets ally of the following criteria: • A proposed residential development of more than 500 dwelling units • A proposed shopping center or business establishment employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 500,000 sf of floor space • A proposed commercial office building employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 250,000 sf of floor space • A proposed hotel or motel, or both, having more than 500 rooms • A proposed industrial, manufacturing, or processing plant, or industrial park planned to house more than 1,000 persons, occupying more than 40 acres of land, or having more than 650,000 sf of floor area • A mix -used project that includes one or more of these elements • A project that would create the equivalent demand of water required by a 500 residential unit project • If a public water system has fewer than 5,000 service connections, then "project" means any proposed residential, business, commercial, hotel or motel, or industrial development that would account for all increase of ten percent or m(,,)re in ihe number of the public water system's CXistillg service cormectiom, or a mixed-Lise project that would deinarid an amount of water equivalent to, or greater than, the amount of water required by residential development that would represent an increase of 10 percent or more in the number of the public water system's existing service connections (CWC Section 10912). _ .. . ............. . ..... . . ........ . .. . . ............ ESA / D130953 Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.6-9 April 2015 Draft Environmental Impact Report 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3 6 .._, ........,.m... .. ...... . �.,..., ...._.. Hydrology and Water Quality Senate Bill 610 Applicability The Specific Plan area would experience a steady increase in the population and the associated number of households. Build out under the proposed Specific Plan would add approximately 833 residential dwelling units and 289,135 square feet of commercial space to the Specific Plan area, which would result in a total population at buildout of 3,655 residents and 755 employees. Therefore, the proposed Specific Plan would result in an increase of over 500 residential units in addition to commercial space, and would require preparation of a WSA. Regional and Local Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region (Basin Plan) The preparation and adoption of water quality control plans (Basin Plans) are required by the California Water Code (Section 13240). According to Section 13050 of the California Water Code, Basin Plans establish the beneficial uses to be protected for the waters within a specified area, water quality objectives to protect those uses, and an implementation program for achieving the objectives. Because beneficial uses, together with their corresponding water quality objectives, can be defined per federal regulations as water quality standards, the Basin Plans are regulatory references for meeting the state and federal requirements for water quality control. In relevant part, Article X, Section 2 of the California Constitution declares: "[B]ecause of the conditions prevailing in this state, the general welfare requires that the ra ces r 'tae sir tc° Itis= lr�„it tri rrr y , Cirjl J4"V t��_L& rcllc�,w,.exteni o iyt i eb 1hel, ai e �rlrft, and that the waste or unreasonable use or unreasonable method of use of water be prevented, and that the conservation of such waters is to be exercised with a view to the reasonable and beneficial use thereof in the interest of the people and for the public welfare...” (emphasis added) The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region (Basin Plan) is designed to preserve and enhance water quality and protect beneficial uses of all waters. Specifically, it: i. Designates beneficial uses for surface and ground waters; ii. Sets narrative and numerical objectives that must be attained or maintained to protect the designated beneficial uses and conform to the state's anti -degradation policy; and iii. Describes implementation programs for achieving objectives to protect all waters in the Region. The Basin Plan incorporates all applicable state and RWQCB plans and policies and other pertinent water quality policies and regulations, including the anti -degradation policy (LARWQCB, 1994). In addition, the Basin Plan includes specific objectives for concentrations of chemical constituents are also applied to bodies of water based on their designated beneficial uses. The Basin Plan indicates the beneficial uses for the Big Dalton Wash, Walnut Creek and Reach 3 of the San Gabriel River, shown above in Table 3.6-1. ........................ . Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.6-10 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3, Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures .... ....,.,.. 3.6 Hydrology and Water Quality Los Angeles County Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Permit The current Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit for Los Angeles County (Order No. R4-2012-0175) was adopted on November 8, 2012, became effective December 28, 2012, and will expire on December 28, 2017. Order No. R4-2012-0175 is the fourth iteration of the storm water permit for the MS4s in the Los Angeles region, which includes: Los Angeles County Flood Control District, County of Los Angeles, and 84 incorporated cities within the County watersheds excluding the City of Long Beach. The permit contains requirements that are necessary to improve efforts to reduce the discharge of pollutants in storm water runoff to the maximum extent practicable (MEP) and achieve water quality standards. This permit requires that runoff is addressed during the major phases of urban development (planning, construction, and operation) in order to reduce the discharge of pollutants from storm water to the MEP, effectively prohibit non -storm water discharges and protect receiving waters. MS4 Permit also include construction requirements for implementation of minimum construction site BMPs for erosion, sediment, non -storm water management and waste management on construction sites, which are listed in Table 3.6-3. TABLE 3.6-3 MINIMUM BMPS FOR CONSTRUCTION SITES Erosion Controls _ Scheduling Preservation of Existing Vegetation Sediment Controls Silt Fence Sandbag Barrier Stabilized Construction Site Entrance/Exit Non -Storm Water Management Water Conservation Practices Dewatering Operations Waste Management Material Delivery and Storage Stockpile Management Spill Prevention and Control Solid Waste Management Concrete Waste Management Sanitary/Septic Waste Management The permit also requires the design and implementation of specific post -construction controls to mitigate storm water pollution, prior to project completion, for all "new development" and "redevelopment" projects that meet certain criteria as specified in the permit. During operation of new development or redevelopment, the permit prohibits non -storm water discharges from the development (with some conditional exceptions), and requires BMPs to eliminate discharges to the MEP. Storm water effluent must meet water -quality based effluent limitations (WQBELs), or water quality standards for discharge leaving the site, and must not cause or contribute to the Baldwin Park 11 TOD Specific Plan Protect 3.6-11 ESA / 01309 53 April 2015 Draft Environmental Impact Report 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures ,..,., a ..... „ „_ 3.6 Hydrology and Water Quality exceedance of receiving water limitations (water quality standards for receiving waters). The permit requires each permittee to implement a Planning and Land Development Program for all new development, which requires permittees to: (1) Lessen the water quality impacts of development by using smart growth practices such as compact development, directing development towards existing communities via infill or redevelopment, and safeguarding of environmentally sensitive areas. (2) Minimize the adverse impacts from storm water runoff on the biological integrity of Natural Drainage Systems and the beneficial uses of water bodies in accordance with requirements under CEQA (Cal. Pub. Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.). (3) Minimize the percentage of impervious surfaces on land developments by minimizing soil compaction during construction, designing projects to minimize the impervious area footprint, and employing Low Impact Development (LID) design principles to mimic predevelopment hydrology through infiltration, evapotranspiration and rainfall harvest and use. (4) Maintain existing riparian buffers and enhance riparian buffers when possible. (5) Minimize pollutant loadings from impervious surfaces such as roof tops, parking lots, and roadways through the use of properly designed, technically appropriate BMPs (including Source Control BMPs such as good housekeeping practices), LID Strategies, and Treatment Control BMPs. (6) Properly select, design and maintain LID and Hydromodification Control BMPs to address pollutants that are likely to be generated, reduce changes to pre -development hydrology, assure long-term function, and avoid the breeding of vectors. (7) Prioritize the selection of BMPs to remove storm water pollutants, reduce storm water runoff volume, and beneficially use storm water to support an integrated approach to protecting water quality and managing water resources in the following order of preference: (a) On-site infiltration, bioretention and/or rainfall harvest and use. (b) On-site biofiltration, off-site ground water replenishment, and/or off-site retrofit. Los Angeles County Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) The SUSMP was written for compliance with MS4 Permit requirements, and outlines necessary BMPs which must be incorporated into design plans for the specific categories of development and/or redevelopment. These categories include: 1. Single-family hillside homes (only development of one acre or more of surface area is subject to the SUSMP numerical design criteria requirement); 2. Ten or more unit homes (includes single family homes, multifamily homes, condominiums, and apartments); 3. Automotive service facilities (SIC codes 5013, 5014, 5541, 7532-7534, and 7536-7539); __ _ . ................ _ . Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.6-12 ESA J D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures ........ _ ,A , 3.6 Hydrology and Water Quality 4. Restaurants (SIC code 5812); 5. 100,000 sf or more of impervious surface in industrial/commercial 6. Retail gasoline outlet; 7. Parking lot 5,000 sf or more of surface area or with 25 or more parking spaces; 8. Redevelopment projects in subject categories that meet redevelopment thresholds; and 9. Location within or directly adjacent to or discharging directly to an environmentally sensitive area if the discharge is likely to impact a sensitive biological species or habitat and the development creates 2,500 sf or more of impervious surface (LADPW, 2002). The proposed Specific Plan would add a total of approximately 833 residential dwelling units and 289,135 square feet of commercial space to the Specific Plan area at full build out. This buildout would occur incrementally as individual projects are proposed. Individual projects satisfying any of the categories identified above would be required to comply with the County SUSMP submittal requirements as specified on the County SUSMP Review Checklist and listed below: • Provide a hydrology analysis to determine the design flow rate (QPM) or Volume (VM) for the first 3/4 -inch of rainfall that must be treated. • Submit site specific hydraulic calculations along with the recommended structural BMP manufacturer's product specifications to verify the BMP will adequately handle the minimum design flow required for treatment. • Show locations of BMPs on building/drainage plans. • Determine and provide the pre and post development pervious and impervious areas created by the proposed development. • Submit Operation and Maintenance Guidelines that include the designated responsible party to manage the SUSMP devices, employee's training program and duties, operating schedule, maintenance frequency, routine service schedule, specific maintenance activities, copies of resource agency permits. Inspection and servicing of all SUSMP devices must occur on an annual basis at a minimum. The County lists example BMPs to be implemented on sites; examples of these include using minimum pavement widths and permeable pavement, directing of rooftop runoff to pervious areas, and including vegetated swales and strips and infiltration basins throughout the development (LADPW, 2008). City of Baldwin Park Municipal Code Chapter 52 (Storm Water and Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention) Chapter 52 of the City Municipal Code states that no person shall contribute to the discharge of pollutants into runoff, and defers to County, RWQCB and NPDES requirements to regulate pollutants from various construction and development activities. Chapter 52 of the City Municipal Code contains requirements for stormwater pollution control measures in development Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan ........ w,,,,,, ......... __..... ..... _.....,.. Project 3.6-13 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures ........ 3 6 Hydrology and Water Quality and redevelopment projects and authorizes the City of Baldwin Park to further define and adopt stormwater pollution control measures, develop LID principles and requirements, including but not limited to the objectives and specifications for integration of LID strategies, grant waivers from the requirements of the SUSMP, and collect funds for projects that are granted waivers. According to Chapter 52, the following development and redevelopment projects qualify as "planning priority projects": (a) All development projects equal to one acre or greater of disturbed area that adds more than 10,000 square feet of impervious surface area. (b) Industrial parks 10,000 square feet or more of surface area. (c) Commercial malls 10,000 square feet or more of surface area. (d) Retail gasoline outlets with 5,000 square feet or more of surface area. (e) Restaurants (Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) of 5812) with 5,000 square feet or more of surface area. (f) Parking lots with 5,000 square feet or more of impervious surface area, or with 25 or more parking spaces. (g) Streets and roads construction of 10,000 square feet or more of impervious surface area. (h) Automotive service facilities with 5,000 square feet or more of surface area. (i) Projects located in or directly adjacent to, or discharging directly to an environmentally sensitive area (ESA), where the development will: 1. Discharge stormwater runoff that is likely to impact a sensitive biological species or habitat; and 2. Create 2,500 square feet or more of impervious surface area. 0) Single-family hillside homes. (k) Redevelopment projects (in subject categories that meet redevelopment thresholds). Individual projects satisfying any of the categories above shall be designed to control pollutants, pollutant loads, and runoff volume to the maximum extent feasible by minimizing impervious surface area and controlling runoff from impervious surfaces through infiltration, evapotranspiration, bioretention and/or rainfall harvest and use. Planning priority projects shall prepare a LID plan to retain stormwater runoff onsite for the stormwater quality design volume. The storm water quality design volume is defined as the runoff from whichever is greater: the 85th percentile 24-hour runoff event as determined from the Los Angeles County 85th percentile precipitation isohyetal map; or the volume of runoff produced from a 0.75 inch, 24-hour rain event, whichever is greater. Street and road construction of 10,000 square feet or more of impervious surface shall follow USEPA guidance regarding Managing Wet Weather with Green Infrastructure: Green Streets (December 2008 EPA -833-F-08-009) to the maximum extent practicable. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.6-14 ESA/0130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures ......... . q. ......... , ,.,, 3,6 Hydrology and Water Quality If it is determined by the City Engineer that 100 percent of onsite retention of the storm water quality design volume is partially or fully infeasible, the infeasibility shall be demonstrated in the submitted LID plan. The remaining storm water quality design volume that cannot be retained or biofiltered onsite must be treated onsite to reduce pollutant loading. BMPs must be selected and designed to meet pollutant -specific benchmarks as required per the MS4 Permit. City of Baldwin Park General Plan Adopted by the City Council in November 2002, the City of Baldwin Park General Plan contains objectives, policies, and programs to guide future growth and development in the City of Baldwin Park. Hydrology and water quality goals and policies that are relevant to the proposed Specific Plan are listed below. Safety Element: Flood Hazards Goal 2.0: Protect Baldwin Park residents, the work force, and visitors from flood hazards. Policy 2.1: Work in cooperation with the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works to identify and construct needed local and regional storm drain improvements to relieve localized flooding problems. Policy 2.2: Maintain the City's Multihazard Functional Plan and Supplemental Emergency Preparedness Plans in a current and continual state of readiness to respond to flooding, as well as other emergencies. Open Space/Conservation Element: Water Resources Goal 5.0: Conserve and protect groundwater supply and water resources. Policy 5.1 Encourage water conservation through education, use of drought -tolerant landscapes, and water -conserving technology. Policy 5.2 Promote the use of native plant material in landscapes and drought tolerant trees, especially in landscapes on City properties. Policy 5.4: Continue enforcement of municipal NPDES Permit to protect water quality within the San Gabriel River watershed. Policy 5,5: Cooperate willr the EPA in efforts to remedy groundwater contamination and implement cleanup practices for the Baldwin Park Superfund site. Water Resources Goal 5.0: Conserve and protect groundwater supply and water resources. Policy 5.4: Continue enforcement of municipal NPDES Permit to protect water quality within the San Gabriel River watershed. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.6-15 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures y..... _ ......... ......... ......... 3,6 Hydrology and Water Quality Policy 5.5: Cooperate with the EPA in efforts to remedy groundwater contamination and implement cleanup practices for the Baldwin Park Superfund site. 3.6.3 Thresholds of Significance In accordance with Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, the project could have a significant impact on hydrology and water quality if it would: • Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements; • Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted); • Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner that would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site; • Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the amount of surface run-off in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site; • Create or contribute run-off water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted run-off; • Otherwise substantially degrade water quality; • Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map; • Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows; • Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam; or • Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. As described in the NOP/Initial Study prepared for this project (Appendix A) the Specific Plan area is not located within a 100 -year flood hazard area. The FIRM for the area (06037C1700F) shows that the Specific Plan area is not located in a flood zone area. As a result, implementation of the project would not place housing or structures within a 100 -year flood zone, and would not create a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding. As further described in the Initial Study, the Specific Plan area has the potential to be inundated with two to six -feet of water from the Santa Fe Flood Control Basin. However, due to the method of construction and the dam's past performance during previous earthquakes, and the fact that water is present only a few months out of the year, catastrophic failure of this dam and resultant flooding are considered Baldwin Paris TOD Specific Plan Project 3.6-16 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures �... 'm - _,.. ®3.6 Hydrology and Water Quality unlikely (City of Baldwin Park, 2002). Thus, no adverse impacts related to flooding are expected as a result of the development of the proposed project and this issue warrants no further discussion in the EIR. The NOP/Initial Study also describes that the Specific Plan area does not contain any streams or rivers and existing drainage patterns in the area would be maintained by implementation of the Specific Plan. In addition, the Specific Plan area is not adjacent or nearby any water body that could subject the Specific Plan area to inundation by seiche or tsunami and it is not anticipated to be subject to mudflow as these events are not known to occur in the project vicinity. Therefore, adverse impacts related to inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow are not expected from implementation of the proposed Specific Plan project, and no further discussion is warranted. 3.6.4 Methodology The following analysis considers the existing environmental setting and regulatory environment applicable to the proposed Specific Plan area. Project implementation could adversely affect the quality of water bodies during construction activities or result in a long-term increase in pollutant levels in storm water originating from the Specific Plan area. The SWRCB 303(d) list was consulted to determine existing impairments in receiving water bodies within the Specific Plan area. An environmental records search report prepared by Environmental Data Resources was used to determine areas of contaminated groundwater levels within the Specific Plan area (EDR, 2014). Considering the project characteristics and existing conditions, the following potential impacts were evaluated and mitigation measures provided, where applicable. 3.6.5 Impact Analysis Impact 3.6.1: The proposed project could violate water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. Construction Demolition of existing structures, removal of existing vegetation and trees, pavement and concrete replacement, grading, stockpiling of materials, excavation and the import/export of soil and building materials, construction of new structures, and landscaping activities could expose and loosen sediment and building materials, which have the potential to mix with storm water and urban runoff and degrade surface and receiving water quality. Furthermore, construction generally requires the use of heavy equipment and construction -related chemicals, such as concrete, cement, asphalt, fuels, oils, antifreeze, transmission fluid, grease, solvents and paints. In the absence of proper controls, these potentially harmful materials could be accidentally spilled or improperly disposed of during construction activities and could wash into and pollute surface waters or groundwater, resulting in a significant impact to water quality. Pollutants of concern during construction projects generally include sediments, trash, petroleum products, concrete waste (dry and wet), sanitary waste, and chemicals. Each of these pollutants on its own or in combination with other pollutants can have a detrimental effect on water quality. In addition, chemicals, liquid products, petroleum products (such as paints, solvents, and fuels), and Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.6-17 ESA I D130953 Draft Environmental impact Report April 2015 3, Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3.6 Hydrology and Water Quality concrete -related waste may be spilled or leaked during construction, which would have the potential to be transported via storm runoff into nearby receiving waters and eventually may affect downstream hydrologic areas, such as Big Dalton Wash, Walnut Creek, and the San Gabriel River Reach 3. During construction activities, excavated soil would be exposed thereby increasing the potential for soil erosion and sedimentation to occur compared to existing conditions. In addition, during construction, vehicles and equipment are prone to tracking soil and/or spoil from work areas to paved roadways, which is another form of erosion. Each future development proposal occurring under the proposed Specific Plan would be assessed individually to ensure compliance with applicable NPDES requirements. In order to control the impact of erosion, sedimentation, and other pollutants on receiving waters, the SWRCB Construction General Permit, requires the implementation of BMPs to eliminate or reduce the discharge of pollutants in storm water discharges, and prohibits the discharge of non -storm water from construction sites as these non -storm water discharges are likely to carry pollutants to receiving waters. Under the Construction General Permit, the development projects under the proposed Specific Plan would be required to prepare a SWPPP and implement construction BMPs detailed in the SWPPP during construction activities, including the minimum BMPs listed in Table 3.6-3. Construction BMPs would be designed to minimize erosion and sedimentation and prevent spills. Various BMPs may be needed at different times during construction, since activities are constantly changing site conditions. Selection of erosion control BMPs is based on minimizing disturbed areas, stabilizing disturbed areas, and protecting water quality. Selection of sediment control BMPs is based on retaining sediment onsite and controlling the site perimeter. In addition, the SWPPP identifies the following: equipment storage, cleaning and maintenance areas/activities; points of ingress and egress to the construction site; material loading, unloading, and storage practices and areas, including construction materials, building materials and waste materials; and materials, equipment, or vehicles that may come in contact with storm water. Compliance with the Construction General Permit, which would include implementation of BMPs that are designed, implemented, and maintained to address pollutants of concern, as required by the provisions of the Construction General Permit, no adverse water quality impacts would occur during construction of activities associated with implementation of the proposed Specific Plan. In addition, a Notice of Construction would be required to be submitted to RWQCB at least 30 days prior to the start of construction activities, which includes preparation and implementation of a SWPPP. A Notice of Construction Completion would be required to be submitted to RWQCB upon completion of construction and stabilization of the site. As a result, construction impacts related to water quality standards or waste discharge requirements from implementation of development project by the proposed Specific plan would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation required Significance Determination: Less than significant Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.6-18 ESA! D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report Apt 2015 3. Environmental 'Set1ing, Impacts and Mitigation Measures ........ .,,,,..... ----.. 3,6 Hydrologyand Water Quality Operation The intensification of land uses by implementation of the Specific Plan may introduce new or additional pollutants to an existing area. Pollutants associated with the operation of the infill and/or redeveloped commercial, public facility, mixed use, and residential structures generally include sediments, trash, petroleum products, metals, and chemicals that could potentially discharge into surface waters either directly or during storm water runoff events. This could create new or exacerbate existing water quality impairments. As described above, Walnut Creek is impaired by pH; a pH impairment can be worsened by introduction of various household and commercial chemicals or landscape fertilizers associated with land uses included in the proposed Specific Plan. Both Walnut Creek and Reach 3 of the San Gabriel River are currently listed as impaired on the USEPA's 303(d) list by indicator bacteria for fecal contamination; utilization of fertilizers containing animal fecal matter or improper disposal of pet wastes could worsen this impairment. Any additional pollutants that enter into surface waters either directly or during storm water runoff events could result in further impairment of surface water quality. Any increase in impervious areas that may occur as a result of implementation of the proposed Specific Plan would increase the volume of runoff during a storm, which would more effectively transport pollutants generated during operation into receiving waters. In addition, as the amount of impervious surfaces and runoff increases, less water is able to infiltrate into the ground. Infiltration allows water to travel more slowly to the water bodies that drain the Specific Plan area, including Big Dalton Wash, Walnut Creek, and the San Gabriel River Reach 3. Water that travels too quickly can transport more sediment and other pollutants, thereby impairing water quality of the water body. In addition, high velocity flows could result in erosion. The projects implemented by the Specific Plan would be required to implement Source Control and Treatment Control BMPs to reduce the discharge of pollutants to the maximum extent practicable. Treatment Control BMPs would also be required to be incorporated into the design of onsite storm drain systems to treat runoff in accordance with the SUSMP standards and as required by the City. The California Storm Water BMP Handbook—New Development and Redevelopment (2004) lists various types of Site Design, Source Control and Treatment Control BMPs to be implemented by new development and redevelopment projects. Typical Source Control BMPs that maybe applicable to development projects within the Specific Plan are provided in Table 3.6-4. BMPs would be designed and implemented on a per site basis as needed. Table 3.6-5 shows typical Treatment Control BMPs that may be applicable to the development projects depending on the nature of the individual proposals. TABLE 3.6-4 TYPICAL SOURCE CONTROL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Identifier Name Project -Specific Application SD -10 Site Design and Landscape vegetation used would be drought -tolerant and will require Landscape Planning minimal irrigation and fertilizer application. SDA 1 Roof Runoff Controls The objective is to reduce the total volume and rate of runoff from Baldwin Park TOD Specific Pian Project 3.6-19 ESA! D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3, Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures "I _ . . . . ........................... _ . .. . . ..................................... . . . 3 6 Hydrology and Water Quality Identifier Name Project -Specific Application individual lots, and retain pollutants onsite that may be picked up from roofing materials and atmospheric deposition. Roof runoff controls consist of directing the roof runoff away from paved areas and mitigating flow to the storm drain. SD -12 Efficient Irrigation Irrigation systems will be fitted wilh soil moisture sensors or precipitation detectors and designed to eliminate overspray onto impervious surfaces. SD -13 Storm Drain System Areas near drain inlets will be stenciled for public awareness to indicate Signs release to surface waters. SD -21 Alternative Building Roofing materials for the buildings would consist of built-up roofing or Materials metal sheet roofing with a durable painted surface that resists degradation. This type of roofing material will typically ncuts increase metals in roof runoff, as would roofing materials constructed of galvanized metal or copper. SD -31 Maintenance Bays and Loading docks would be designed to prevent run-on from outside the Docks loading dock area and will be covered to prevent rainfall influence. SD -32 Trash Enclosures Trash and recycling materials would be stored to prevent runoff from storage areas (e.g., construction of a roof and berm around trash containers), and pick-up would be appropriately scheduled. SD -33 Vehicle Washing Areas During Construction, Project Plans should include appropriately !designed area(s) for washing -steam cleaning of vehicles and eqUipinent. Depending on the size and other parameters of the wastewater facility, wash water may be conveyed to a sewer, an infiltration system, rocycUng system or other alternative. Pretreatment may be required for conveyance to a sanitary sewer. SD -34 Outdoor Material Storage During construction, the method of storing outdoor storage of materials Areas should be specified. Materials that could result In contaminated storm water 111110ff ShOUld not be stored outdoors. If suspect materials are stored outdoors, their removal and cleanup before storm events should be specified. SD -35 Outdoor Work Areas Design areas to contain pollutants and collect and convey runoff to sanitary sewer system during construction activities. SOURCE: CASQA, 2004. Baldwin Park TOD specific Plan Project 3.6-20 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3- Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures m ...... ,..,-.-.-.- ................. 3,6 Hydrology and Water Quality TABLE 3.6-5 TYPICAL TREATMENT CONTROL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Identifier Name Project -Specific Application TC -30 Vegetated Swales Vegetated swales are open, shallow channels with vegetation covering the side slopes and bottom that collect and slowly convey runoff flow to downstream discharge points. They are designed to treat runoff through filtering by the vegetation in the channel, filtering through a subsoil matrix, and/or infiltration into the underlying soils. TC -31 Vegetated Buffer Strip Grassed buffer strips (vegetated filter strips, filter strips, and grassed filters) are vegetated surfaces that are designed to treat sheet flow from adjacent surfaces. Filter strips function by slowing runoff velocities and allowing sediment and other pollutants to settle and by providing some infiltration into underlying soils. TC -32 Bioretention The bioretention BMP functions as a soil and plant -based filtration device that removes pollutants through a variety of physical, biological, and chemical treatment processes. TC -40 Media Filter Storm water media filters are usually two -chambered including a pretreatment settling basin and a filter bed filled with sand or other absorptive filtering media. TC -50 Water Quality Inlet Water quality inlets, also commonly called trapping catch basins, oil/grit separators or oil/water separators, consist of one or more chambers that promote sedimentation of coarse materials and separation of free oil (as opposed to emulsified or dissolved oil) from storm water. TC -60 Multiple Systems A multiple treatment system uses two or more BMPs in series. MP -60 Drain Insert Drain inserts are manufactured filters or fabric placed in a drop inlet to remove sediment and debris. SOURCE: CASQA, 2004. Implementation of site specific source control and treatment control BMPs in accordance with the SUSMP standards would remove potential pollutants from runoff and would not contribute additional pollutant loads into receiving waters. Applicable BMPs would be implemented on a case-by-case basis in accordance with County of Los Angeles NPDES MS4 Permit and associated SUSMP requirements, as required per Order R4-2012-0175. At a minimum, it is required that downstream drainage discharge points would be provided with erosion protection and designed such that flow hydraulics exiting the site mimics the natural condition to the maximum amount practicable. The SUSMP shall include a drainage hydrologic/hydraulic analysis that details the site's anticipated runoff calculations. With implementation of these requirements, the development projects that would be implemented by the proposed Specific Plan would not result in adverse impacts to water quality, i.e., a violation of water quality standards or water quality objectives. According to City requirements, planning priority projects would be required to retain the storm water quality design volume. Any portion of the storm water quality design volume that could not be retained would be required to be treated onsite to reduce pollutant loading in runoff. Furthermore, the proposed Specific Plan building guidelines that include storm water runoff reduction and capture; interspersing landscaped areas within impervious areas; including landscaped open space. As a result, implementation of these Specific Plan guidelines would also _...-, ,__ __ ------ .....A _ --------------------- . ......... ......... ......... Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.6-21 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3.6 Hydrology and Water Quality prevent operational impacts related to water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. Thus, impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation required Significance Determination: Less than significant Impact 3.6.2: The proposed project could substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted). As described above, the Main San Gabriel Groundwater Basin underlies most of the San Gabriel Valley, including the Specific Plan area, and the major sources of recharge to the Basin are direct penetration of rainfall on the valley floor, percolation of runoff from the mountains, percolation of imported water, and return flow from applied water (Civiltec, 2008). In addition, the depth to groundwater in the vicinity of the Specifics Plan area is approximately 194 feet below the ground surface (bgs) (DWR, 2013). The Specific Plan involves infill development and redevelopment within an existing urban and mainly impervious area, including buildings, paved sidewalks and parking lots. Since more than ninety percent of the existing Specific Plan area is already impervious, implementation of the proposed Specific Plan would generate little or no increase in the amount of impervious surfaces (Baldwin Park, 2014). In fact, implementation of the Specific Plan would result in a decrease in impervious surfaces since the Specific Plan includes trees and landscaping as part of its streetscape improvements, which would minimize large stretches of impervious surfaces and would increase infiltration. Therefore, project implementation would not result in a change in impervious surface area such that the infiltration of surface water to groundwater would be affected. Water service to the Specific Plan area is provided by Valley County Water District (VCWD). Seventy three percent of VCWD water supplies include groundwater pumped from the Main San Gabriel Basin, and imports about 24 percent of its water from the Metropolitan Water District. VCWD defers to the Upper San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District regarding acquiring replenishment water for purposes of recharging the Basin, as they are more ideally positioned to do so (Civiltec, 2011). As discussed in Section 3.14, Utilities and Service Systems, the proposed new uses from implementation of the proposed Specific Plan would generate a total water demand of approximately 195.95 acre-feet/year (AFY), which would occur incrementally over the anticipated 20 -year implementation of the Specific Plan. Water deliveries within the City are projected to increase from 9,201AFY in 2015 to 9,846 AFY by 2035.The City would have supplies of approximately 10,356 AFY in both 2015 and 2035. The water delivery projection Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.6-22 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures ......... ......... 3.6 Hydrology and Water Quality reflects the projected growth in demand from existing uses, as well as future growth and development within the City. As a result, the City is estimated to have between 1,155 AFY and 510 AFY of surplus water supply between the years 2015 and 2035; the total water demand from build out of the Specific Plan (57.45 AFY) would be accommodated by this surplus of supplies. Therefore, the total water demand from the proposed Specific Plan would be accommodated by current water sources for the City of Baldwin Park and there would not be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level such that the production rate of existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted. In addition, depletion of groundwater would not occur because of the adjudication of the basin, which is managed by the Basin Watermaster to ensure that the annual operating demands meet the replenishment water. Therefore, impacts related to groundwater recharge would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation required Significance Determination: Less than significant Impact 3.6.3: The proposed project could substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner that would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. The Specific Plan area is a developed urban area, in which no streams or rivers pass through. Stormwater run-off sheet flows across impervious surfaces and is collected by curbs and gutters and conveyed to storm drains. Existing storm drains convey stormwater flows south and southeast, eventually discharging into Big Dalton Wash and Walnut Creek. Construction Construction would include excavation and the overall disturbance of existing landscape, and would expose bare soil, and could temporarily alter drainage patterns with the potential to cause erosion and sedimentation. Adherence with statewide NPDES Construction General Permit or MS4 Permit construction requirements would ensure erosion or siltation does not occur onsite through implementation of erosion and sediment control BMPs during construction of projects under the proposed Specific Plan. These requirements would include the implementation of minimum BMPs (listed in Table 3.6-3), typical Source Control BMPs listed in Table 3.6-4, and typical Treatment Control BMPs listed in Table 3.6-5 for erosion, sediment, non -storm water management and waste management. Adherence to the MS4 Permit and Construction General Permit conditions would ensure that potential water quality degradation associated with the construction of future development projects within the Specific Plan area would be minimized. With implementation of erosion and sediment control BMPs, as would be required by the appropriate permitting authorities and goals, policies, and implementation measures to reduce water quality impacts, construction -related impacts related to alteration of an existing drainage pattern that could result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site from future development projects occurring under the proposed Specific Plan would be less than significant. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.6-23 ESA ( D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures __ ........ 3,6 Hydrology and Water Quality Operation By implementing long-term changes to streetscapes, pedestrian walkways, increasing parking spaces, etc., the proposed Specific Plan development would minimally alter local drainage patterns. The project does not involve the alteration of the course of a stream or river. The surface drainage would continue to be collected by the same existing storm drains, which outlet into Big Dalton Wash and Walnut Creek. The infill development and redevelopment that would occur by the proposed Specific Plan would generate little or no increase in the runoff into the existing drainage system, since more than ninety percent of the existing Specific Plan area is already impervious (Baldwin Park, 2014). Additionally, there is a low erosion potential because the Specific Plan area includes mainly paved surfaces lacking sediment. As the volume of storm water runoff from the Specific Plan area is not anticipated to increase, an increase in on- or off-site soil erosion and siltation is not anticipated. In fact, because existing development was constructed before SUSMP requirements were in place, implementation of the proposed project would be expected to reduce the potential for soil erosion and siltation. City requirements state that planning priority projects must retain 100 percent of the storm water quality design volume onsite or. Any projects that cannot feasibly retain this runoff must treat it onsite to reduce pollutant loading prior to its release. In addition, the proposed Specific Plan involves implementation of landscaped street frontages as part of streetscape improvements, landscaped areas adjacent to pedestrian walkways, and landscaped open space as part of the new Arts Park. These vegetated areas would help to capture and infiltrate some surface water runoff, and would reduce the overall amount of surface runoff generated and leaving project sites. Furthermore, SUSMP requires that the City review site design BMPs through requiring the submittal of BMP locations in design and grading plan and calculations demonstrating that BMPs would adequately be able to handle the minimum design flow for treatment. SUSMP Operation and Maintenance Plan requirements would ensure maintenance occurs at a minimum on an annual basis. Therefore, runoff would be adequately infiltrated and/or retained so to not generate erosion and/or siltation on or offsite. With compliance with applicable regulatory requirements, impacts related to alteration of an existing drainage pattern that could result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation required Significance Determination: Less than significant. Impact 3.6.4: The proposed project could otherwise substantially degrade water quality. The majority of the Specific Plan area is overlain by impervious surfaces associated with existing buildings, paved areas, and parking lots. Implementation of the Specific Plan would result in a decrease in impervious surfaces in the area and the volume of storm water runoff from the area would be similar to, or less than, existing conditions, thereby reducing the conveyance of pollutants local into surface waters. As discussed under Impact 3.6-3, above, the proposed project Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.6-24 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures .. . ....... 3.6 Hydrology and Water Quality would not involve the alteration of the course of a stream or river. Thus, the implementation of the proposed project would not substantially alter existing drainage patterns in such a way as to result in substantial erosion or siltation. Overall, the proposed Specific Plan would not significantly degrade water quality, as all development would be required to comply with either Construction General Permit or MS4 Permit requirements during construction, which would require implementation of BMPs to reduce impacts to water quality. Operation of all development projects would be required to comply with MS4 Permit and SUSMP requirements as implemented by the City, which would require various levels of stormwater runoff retainment onsite dependent on development type, as well as various source control and treatment BMPs in site design. This would prevent the amount of polluted runoff generated on and/or leaving the site and maintaining downstream water quality. No other impacts to water quality are anticipated. Impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation required Significance Determination: Less than significant. Cumulative Impacts The geographic scope for cumulative impacts on hydrology and water quality includes the Walnut Creek subwatershed and the San Gabriel Valley Basin. Implementation of the proposed Specific Plan would include compliance with of all required laws, permits, ordinances and plans, such as the MS4 Permit, LID, SUSMP, and Construction General Permit requirements, that would reduce incremental effects to hydrology and water quality. The Specific Plan development would not result in a substantial increase of impervious surfaces within the Specific Plan area and may in fact result in an overall decrease in impervious surfaces as new projects are implemented and are required to include pervious surfaces to retain storm water drainage onsite. This increase in pervious surfaces and implementation of BMPs as required by the MS4 Permit would lead to a decrease in pollutant loadings and potential increase in infiltration of storm water and non -storm water. This could have a positive impact on water quality and hydrology compared to existing conditions. The areas surrounding the Specific Plan area are of similar urban pervious nature, and any future development would also not likely increase the amount of impervious surfaces but may also decrease pervious surfaces in order to meet runoff requirements. This could result in a positive cumulative impact on water quality and hydrology. There are 18 related projects surrounding the Specific Plan area that are also within the Walnut Creek subwatershed. These related projects generally consist of multi -family residential and commercial development, with some single-family residential, industrial and recreational development (see Table 2-7 in Chapter 2, Project Description), which could contribute to increased runoff due to increases in impervious surfaces. In addition, other future developments within the urban and developed subwatershed would have similar effects. However, the past, current, and reasonably foreseeable future projects in the subwatershed would be required to Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.6-25 ESA ! D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures .... _ .._..... 3.6 Hydrology and Water Quality implement similar measures when obtaining the relevant permits, including compliance with the LID Manual and SUSMP requirements. This would help reduce impacts to water quality and retain runoff, and to ensure that the incremental effects of individual projects do not cause a substantial cumulative impact related to water quality. For example, during operation, projects would be required to maintain water quality through development and implementation of LID BMPs. In addition, the Los Angeles County ordinances regarding NPDES permitting requirements apply throughout the region. The analysis within this EIR has identified that sufficient water supplies are available to serve build out of the proposed Specific Plan in addition to the existing water supply demand and the demand from the identified related projects. Additional future projects would need to similarly identify their incremental demand on water supplies, and in doing so, would determine whether groundwater supplies would be affected by development. As described above groundwater rights are adjudicated in the Basin, which has regulated groundwater supplies and identifies the natural safe yield that can be withdrawn from the aquifer without adverse effect, after considering natural replenishment from runoff and precipitation. However, the adjudicated pumping amounts are still greater than the natural replenishment of the groundwater basins, creating an annual deficit, or overdraft. The Water Replenishment District of Southern California is enabled under the California Water Code to purchase and recharge additional water to make up the overdraft, which is known as artificial replenishment, or managed aquifer recharge. Regional projects to increase water supply reliability are currently underway by the Water Replenishment District of Southern California. The Groundwater Reliability Improvement Program (GRIP) is a recycled water project by WRD that is anticipated to be implemented in the near future, and would replace imported water with recycled water for recharge in the Montebello Forebay. GRIP is the result of numerous studies conducted over a number of years to improve water supply reliability in the face of imported water supply uncertainties and increasing costs (AECOM, 2014). Overall, potential impacts to hydrology and water quality associated with future development in the Specific Plan and the region would not be cumulatively considerable with compliance with all applicable laws, permits, ordinances and plans. As a result, potential impacts to hydrology and water quality from the proposed Specific Plan in combination with the related projects would be less than cumulatively considerable. Significance Determination: Less than cumulatively considerable Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.6-26 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures ®, ............_.._ - ......... — 3.6 Hydrology and Water Quality References — Hydrology and Water Quality California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Los Angeles Region, Water Quality Control Plan, Los Angeles Region (Basin Plan), June 1994. California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA), New Development and Redevelopment Handbook, 2004. City of Baldwin Park. 2002. Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan. Adopted November 20, 2002. Department of Water Resources (DWR). 2004. California's Groundwater Bulletin 118: San y Accessed at Gabriel riel Vallwe 1lGroundwlllel�mBgr�ntnwxrl�r�l?�rllctid� Q( ernberwA, 2014. DWR. 2013. Groundwater Levels for Station 340928NI 179439W001. Accessed at rC:/'www r11.t.cit.cyvlw�9IT,�ci:t,�liltxrr°1lr�,tlratr11c1�atrtp6rall�M�M���,,fl�Csl°11211 E E -4891„- on January 6, 2015. Environmental Data Resources (EDR). 2014. The EDR Radius Map Report. Baldwin Park Ramona Blvd & N Maine Ave, Baldwin Park, CA 91706. Inquiry Number: 4126809.2s, November 05, 2014 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Superfund Sites Where You Live. Accessed at 1r.1''�vww a. pR ocfvl>1Walarl'�aaaf/use/ on January 12, 2015. Los Angeles County. 2015. Los Angeles County GIS Data Portal. Accessed at 11 1):/Ptd 1 qgoL t,c 1,11 r 1 i 11 on January 6, 2015. Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LADPW). 2014. Low Impact Development Standards Manual. February 2014. Accessed at lady y -- aw ! acount�rr JN�1 ;1 �l JB Jul l t °old: gy m �r° .?0� ,�3r im/?Of evc�o Jr ti r�20Slaiictq rds%20Manqjrl4Won January 13, 2015. LADPW. 2008. Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) Review Sheet. Revised January 9, 2008. Accessed at http://dpw.lacounty.govB SD/lib/fp/Drainage%20and%2OGrading/Plan%20Check°/o2ODoc uments/SUSMP%20Review%2OSheet%2006-13-2011.pdf on January 12, 2015. LADWP. 2006 Hydrology Manual. January 2006 Accessed at la�tp://aiga v 1aa.s �,atnty.a taxa/ur r / fulrl art tlu7leaa wiraec;t lu ,l?(lf1(M [ l a'a logy l aaaa,tll"?i 0(i!,/—o ftU a of gy!/20Maraual Divirlr,cl. ad:l'"on January 13, 2015. Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board, the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit for Municipal Stormwater and Urban Runoff Discharges within the County of Los Angeles, adopted Order 01-182. Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (LARWQCB). (1994).Water Quality Control Plan: Los Angeles Region. Basin Plan for the Coastal Watersheds of Los Angeles and Ventura County. Accessed at Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.6-27 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3.6 Hydrology and Water Quality <http://www.waterboards. ca. gov/rwgcb4/water_issues/programs/basin_plan/electronics_docu ments/bpl_introduction.pdf> on January 7, 2013. Main San Gabriel Basin Water Master. 2015. "Main San Gabriel Basin." Accessed at btt www,w:ate,riitastci,or,/basiutaiiaLi :L(tLi� anti I^"�,l�r i,Ly 1., 2015. Moore Iacofano Goltsman (Moore). 2006. A Common Thread Rediscovered: San Gabriel River Corridor Master Plan. Prepared for the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works. June 2006. Accessed at http://ladpw.org/wmd/watershed/sg/mp/docs/SGR_MP- Chapterl.pdfon December 4, 2015. State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). 2010 Integrated Report (Clean Water Act Section 303(d) List / 305(b) Report). Accessed at http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/tmdl/integrated2010.shtml on December 10, 2014. Western Regional Climate Center. Glendora West, California. Period of record: 1/1/1895 to 2/28/2011. Accessed at: http://www.wrce.dri.edu/cgi-bin/cliMAIN.pl?ca3452 on December 1, 2014. Civiltec. 2011. Urban Water Management Plan. Accessed at http://www.water.ca.gov/urbanwatermanagement/2010uwmps/Valley %2OCounty%20 Wate r%20Distriet/VCWD%202010%20UWMP%2OVolume%201-Report.pdf on January 12, 2015. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.6-28 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 3.7 Land Use Introduction This section addresses the impacts of the proposed project on existing and planned land uses in the vicinity of the proposed Specific Plan. The land use analysis considers the compatibility of the proposed Specific Plan project with the applicable local and regional policies and regulations, including Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) plans, the City of Baldwin Park General Plan, and other applicable plans and policies. 3.7.1 Environmental Setting Regional The City of Baldwin Park is located in the San Gabriel Valley region of Los Angeles County, which consists of 31 cities and five unincorporated communities. The major cities and communities include Alhambra, Arcadia, Azusa, Baldwin Park, Bradbury, Claremont, Covina and West Covina, Diamond Bar, Duarte, El Monte, Glendora, Industry, Irwindale, La Canada Flintridge, La Puente, La Verne, Monrovia, Montebello, Monterey Park, Pasadena, Pomona, Rosemead, and South Pasadena. While the San Gabriel Valley consists of predominantly suburban land uses (i.e., single-family housing, shopping malls, and strip malls), this area is densely developed and has a population of approximately two million people within a 200 - square -mile area (approximately 10,000 people per square mile). Baldwin Park is surrounded by the cities of Irwindale, West Covina, Industry, and El Monte, as well as by La Puente, an unincorporated area of Los Angeles County (see Figure 2-1, in Section 2.0, Project Description) and contains a land use pattern similar to most of the communities in the region, consisting of mostly suburban uses, such as single and multi -family housing, retail shopping centers, and civic uses. Specific Plan Area Downtown Baldwin Park is a prime commercial retail area of the city and includes a high concentration of core government, transportation, and recreation services, including City Hall, the Police Station, Post Office, Valley Water District, Morgan Park Community Center, and the Baldwin Park Metrolink Station for the San Bernardino Line. Table 3.7-1 lists existing land uses within the Specific Plan area and Figure 2-3, in Section 2.0, Project Description) shows the existing land uses within the Specific Plan area. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.7-1 ESA f D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures — ..._. ......_. — - — 3.7 Land Use TABLE 3.7-1 SPECIFIC PLAN AREA EXISTING LAND USES Land Use Acres % of Specific Plan Area General Office Use 2.42 2.10 Government Offices 4.71 4.10 High -Density Single Family Residential 7.73 6.72 Low -Rise Apartments, Condominiums, Townhouses 0.53 0.46 Manufacturing, Assembly, Industrial Services 3.83 3.33 Mixed Commercial and Industrial 2.29 2.00 Open Space and Public Facilities 10.55 9.18 Park and Ride Lots 1.55 1.35 Metrolink San Bernardino Line 3.24 2.82 Retail 41.47 36.08 Total Net Acres 78.32 68.14 Right of Way 36.62 31.86 Total Gross Acres 114.95 100.00 SOURCE: Arroyo Group, 2014 Commercial Uses Commercial uses comprise approximately 41 acres within the Specific Plan area and are largely clustered along Ramona Boulevard and Maine Avenue. One of the primary patterns of commercial development within the Specific Plan area consists of strip -mall style shopping areas setback from the street by large surface parking lots, some of which include stand-alone buildings. Generally, these strip malls contain mostly neighborhood -serving retail uses and offices such as grocery stores, restaurants, dry cleaners, small retail establishments, real estate offices, dentists' offices, or banks. The three primary strip malls within the Specific Plan area are the Valuplus Marketplace, located along Ramona Boulevard between La Rica and Baldwin Park Boulevard; Park Plaza located along Ramona Boulevard between Maine and Bogart Avenues; and Maine Avenue Marketplace at the southwest corner of Maine Avenue and Clark Street. Along Ramona Boulevard, there are older one- to two-story retail buildings that face the street, but are setback from the street by landscaped medians and narrow access roads that are lined on both sides by angled parking. This pattern exists primarily along the southern side of Ramona Boulevard, with small pockets along the north side between Morgan Park and Maine Avenue and again between Bogart and Downing Avenues. This type of commercial development also exists along the eastern side of Maine Avenue between Palmrose and Clark Streets. Uses within these retail areas are similar to those in the strip -malls typical along the north side of Ramona Boulevard, including hair and nail salons, restaurants, travel agencies, pharmacies, doctor or dentist offices, and a post office. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.7-2 ESA / D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures _ ... . 111-1 3.7 Land Use Residential Uses Residential uses within the Specific Plan area and are primarily high-density single-family houses. To the north of Ramona Boulevard, residential uses are located along Bogart Avenue and along Palmrose Avenue near the intersection with Bogart Avenue. To the south of Ramona Boulevard, residential uses are located along Sterling Way and along Downing Avenue roughly between Pacific Avenue and Jeremie Street. There is also a single-family residential development comprising several blocks located at the southeast corner of Downing Avenue and Badillo Street. Government Uses/Public Facilities Government uses/public facilities consist of approximately 22 acres located throughout the Specific Plan area. They include City -owned property such as the Baldwin Park City Hall, the police station, the Arts and Recreation Center located adjacent to City Hall, and Morgan Park located at the northeast corner of Baldwin Park and Ramona Boulevards. In addition, the U.S. Post Office operates a facility located at 4230 Maine Avenue at Palmrose Street. The Specific Plan area also includes the railway right-of-way and the station for the San Bernardino Metrolink line that runs through Baldwin Park. The railroad tracks cross Ramona Boulevard at Downing Street and the Metrolink station is located on Downing Avenue south of Ramona Boulevard, adjacent to City Hall. Industrial Uses Industrial uses comprise approximately six acres within the Specific Plan area and are located primarily along the north side of Alderson Avenue and along the south side of Downing Avenue roughly between Central Avenue and Badillo Street. Uses include auto repair shops, appliance service shops, warehousing and distribution centers, and storage yards. 3.7.2 Setting Regional Southern California Association of Governments SCAG is the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for six counties: Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino, Riverside, Ventura, and Imperial. As the designated MPO for the region, SCAG is mandated by the federal government to research and create plans for transportation, growth management, hazardous waste management, and air quality. SCAG's major responsibilities include: • Maintenance of a continuous, comprehensive, and coordinated planning process resulting in a Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and a Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP). • Development of demographic projections plus the integrated land use, housing, employment, transportation programs, measures, and strategies portions of the South Coast Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP), as well as serving as co -lead agency for air quality planning for the Central Coast and Southeast Desert air basin districts. _...... ...... _-1 . �._�_._ Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.7-3 ESA! D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3.7 Land Use • Responsibility under the federal Clean Air Act (CAA) for determining whether projects, plans, and programs conform to the CAA. • To function as the authorized regional agency for intergovernmental review of programs proposed for federal financial assistance and direct development activities. • Review of environmental impact reports for projects having regional significance for consistency with regional plans. • To function as the authorized area -wide waste treatment management planning agency pursuant to federal water pollution control statutes. • Responsibility under state law for preparation of the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). Because the proposed Specific Plan is a project with regional significance, per CEQA Guidelines Sections 15125(d) and 15206, SCAG is responsible for ensuring that the project is consistent with regional plans, which, in this case, include the Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide (RCPG), the RTP, and the Compass Blueprint Growth Vision. In addition, this EIR uses the most recently adopted SCAG population, housing and job forecasts as the basis for applicable analyses throughout this EIR (see 3. 10, Population and Housing). Regional Transportation Plan 2012-2035/Sustainable Communities Strategy In April 2012, SCAG adopted the 2012-2035 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS). The RTP/SCS includes a strong commitment to reduce emissions from transportation to comply with Senate Bill 375, improve public health, and meet the National Ambient Air Quality Standards as set forth by the federal Clean Air Act. The RTP/SCS links its goals of sustaining mobility with its goals for fostering economic development; enhancing the environment; reducing energy consumption; promoting transportation -friendly development patterns; and encouraging fair and equitable access to residents affected by socio-economic, geographic and commercial limitations. In summary, the 2012-2035 RTP/SCS provides a blueprint for improving quality of life for residents by providing more choices for where they will live, work, and play, and how they will move around. Those policies and the project's consistency with them are discussed in Table 3.7-2 of Section 3.7.4, Impact Assessment, below. Regional Comprehensive Plan The 2008 RCP is an advisory plan that establishes a strategy for defining and solving the region's inter -related housing, traffic, water, air quality and other regional challenges. The RCP ties together SCAG's role in transportation, land use, and air quality planning as well as recommending key roles and responsibilities for public and private sector stakeholders and inviting them to help implement the policies of the RCP. The nine areas covered in the RCP are land use and housing, open space and habitat, water, energy, air quality, solid waste, transportation, security and emergency preparedness, and economy. The Land Use and Housing Chapter contain policies that are particularly applicable to the project. Those policies and the Specific Plan's consistency with them are discussed in Table 3.7-2 of Section 3.7.4, Impact Assessment, below. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.7-4 ESA / D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures ....... . 3.7 Land Use Regional Housing Needs Assessment The Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) is a key tool for SCAG and its member governments to plan for growth in the region. The Final RHNA, which was adopted in August 2012, quantifies the need for housing within each jurisdiction between 2014 and 2021. Communities then plan, consider, and decide how they will address this need through the process of completing the Housing Elements of their General Plans. The RHNA does not necessarily encourage or promote growth, but it helps communities to anticipate growth so that they can guide the growth in such a way as to enhance the quality of life; improve access to jobs, transportation and housing; and not adversely impact the environment. The RHNA consists of two measurements of housing need: (1) existing need and (2) future need. The City of Baldwin Park was assigned an RHNA of 779 units for the 2014-2021 planning period, or an average of approximately 112 units per year (SCAG, 2012). Compass Blueprint Growth Vision and 2 Percent Strategy SCAG has also implemented the Compass Blueprint Growth Vision and 2% Strategy. The overarching goals of the Compass Blueprint 2 Percent Strategy are to increase mobility, enhance the livability, enable prosperity, and promote sustainability within the region. The Compass Blueprint encourages cities and counties to work collaboratively with SCAG to achieve sustainable development plans. It calls for modest changes to current land use and transportation trends on only two percent of the land area of the region: the 2 Percent Strategy Opportunity Areas, which were identified through public participation and land use and transportation modeling and analysis. The 2 Percent Strategy Opportunity Areas are comprised primarily of regional centers; city centers; airports, ports, and industrial centers; priority residential in -fill areas; rail transit stops; and bus rapid transit corridors. Baldwin Park has been identified as a 2 Percent Strategy Opportunity Area due to potential development opportunities on land surrounding the Metrolink station. The Strategy Area is approximately two miles in diameter, centered at the Metrolink station. The following principles from the Compass Blueprint Growth Vision and 2 Percent Strategy pertain to the proposed Specific Plan: Principle 1: Improve mobility for all residents. GV P1.1 Encourage transportation investments and land use decisions that are mutually supportive. GV P1.2 Locate new housing near existing jobs and new jobs near existing housing. GV P1.3 Encourage transit -oriented development. GV PIA Promote a variety of travel choices. Principle 2: Foster livability in all communities. GV P2.1 Promote infill development and redevelopment to revitalize existing communities. GV P2.2 Promote developments, which provide a mix of uses. GV P2.3 Promote "people scaled," walkable communities. GV P2.4 Support the preservation of stable, single-family neighborhoods. m . _. Baldwin Park T TOD Specific Plan Project 3.7-5 ESA J D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3.7 Land Use Principle 3: Enable prosperity for all people. GV P3.1 Provide, in each community, a variety of housing types to meet the housing needs of all income levels. GV P3.2 Support educational opportunities that promote balanced growth. GV P3.3 Ensure environmental justice regardless of race, ethnicity, or income class. GV P3.4 Support local and state fiscal policies that encourage balanced growth. GV P3.5 Encourage civic engagement. Principle 4: Promote sustainability for future generations. GV P4.1 Preserve rural, agricultural, recreational, and environmentally sensitive areas. GV P4.2 Focus development in urban centers and existing cities. GV P4.3 Develop strategies to accommodate growth that use resources efficiently, eliminate pollution, and significantly reduce waste. GV P4.4 Utilize "green" development techniques. City of Baldwin Park Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan Adopted in November 2002, the Land Use Element of the Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan establishes the strategy for long-range development within the City. Overall, the Land Use Plan aims to "maintain a quality environment for families, strengthen the community's image, and diversify and expand the local economy." As a guide to future growth and development, the element identifies the general distribution, location, mix, and extent of desired land uses including residential, commercial, industrial, public facilities, and open space uses. The Land Use Element contains goals and policies that address land use issues on a citywide basis and specific goals and policies for 15 Focus Areas. The proposed Specific Plan area falls within two Focus Areas—the Auction Village Focus Area and the Downtown/Metrolink Focus Area. The Auction Village Focus Area is occupied almost exclusively by older industrial and commercial buildings. This area has been identified by the City as an opportunity area to assemble parcels as potential development sites. The Downtown/Metrolink Focus Area includes Morgan Park, the Downtown, and the Metrolink station. Relevant General Plan policies focus on strengthening the economic vitality and aesthetic character of the Downtown by establishing a mixed-use pedestrian district that builds on Livable Communities principles and techniques.) The General Plan policies related to the proposed Specific Plan are listed below. Livable Community principles and techniques are described in the San Gabriel Valley's Livable Communities Case Studies (dated 1998). This document outlines urban design strategies intended to make Downtown Baldwin Park (as well as five other case study communities) more pedestrian -friendly. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.7-6 ESA / D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures ......... 3.7 Land Use Balanced Development in Baldwin Park Policy 1.1 Provide opportunities for housing development at a range of densities and housing types that accommodate the varied interests and needs of present and future residents. Policy 1.4 Create opportunities for two different levels of commercial development: (1) commercial uses that meet the retail and service needs of the local resident and employee populations, and (2) regional -serving retail commercial businesses that capture revenues from a broader population base. Policy 1.6 Encourage mixed-use development of residential, retail, and commercial uses in Downtown and along the North Maine Avenue corridor as defined in the Land Use Policy Map under the Mixed Use designation. Compatible and Complementary Development Policy 2.2 Allow for continuation of residential uses within residential districts which are non- conforming due to density. Policy 2.5 Require that multi -family, commercial and industrial development provide adequate buffers (such as decorative walls and landscaped setbacks) at the designated boundaries with adjacent uses to prevent impacts on residences due to noise, traffic, parking, light and glare, and differences in scale; to ensure privacy; and to provide visual compatibility. Policy 2.6 Require that the external lighting of commercial and industrial properties be confined to the site to avoid adverse impacts on adjacent land uses due to light spillover or glare. Policy 2.8 Establish standards in the Zoning Code to ensure that all functional, noise, and other impacts associated with the development of residential units on an upper floor of any commercial structure be mitigated. Revitalization and Deteriorating Uses Policy 3.1 Encourage and continue use of redevelopment activities, including provision of incentives for private development, joint public-private partnerships, and public improvements, in designated Redevelopment Project Areas. Policy 3.2 Provide development incentives to facilitate the consolidation of individual parcels along the City's commercial corridors and in industrial districts. Policy 3.4 Encourage the rehabilitation of existing commercial facades and signage. Policy 3.7 As part of the neighborhood beautification efforts, provide street trees and landscaping in the public rights-of-way. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.7-7 ESA / D130593 Draft Environmenlal Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures .................--- ... 3.7 Land Use Focus Area: Downtown/Metrolink Policy 8.1 Provide for a mix of commercial and multi -family residential uses up to 30 units/acre to create 24-hour activity in the Downtown. Allow mixed-use development to consist of vertical integration of commercial and residential uses, as well as mixed uses side by side, on a lot -by -lot basis. Policy 8.2 Define Downtown as a pedestrian overlay zone, and require that new uses and buildings enhance pedestrian activity (refer to techniques outlined in Policy 3.1 of the Urban Design Element). Policy 8.3 Prohibit the use of areas between the sidewalk and a building within the pedestrian orientation zone for parking. Policy 8.4 Encourage the development of outdoor cafes, flower sales, stalls or kiosks, and other uses which are compatible with and stimulate pedestrian activity. Policy 8.5 Restrict non -pedestrian friendly uses (e.g., offices) to 25 percent of the ground floor of any block in this zone. Policy 8.6 Provide an area for limited commercial uses immediately south of the Metrolink platform and the adjacent Park and Ride area directed towards serving Metrolink riders. Establish a pedestrian linkage between the Metrolink platform and Downtown. Policy 8.7 Create an active "paseo" in the courtyard of City Hall. Provide pedestrian connections to Downtown. Policy 8.8 Pursue redesign of automobile -oriented shopping centers on Maine Avenue (Albertson's Center and Maine Avenue Marketplace) to orient some commercial uses towards Maine Avenue, and provide direct pedestrian access off Maine. Policy 8.9 Work in conjunction with Chamber of Commerce to attract family-oriented entertainment uses to the Downtown, such as an arcade for youth, bowling, skating rink, etc. Policy 8.10 Conduct community activities to draw people to the Downtown, such as street fairs, farmers markets, open concerts, ethnic celebrations, etc. Policy 8.11 Pursue development of a Specific Plan for the Downtown to provide further direction on the precise land use, circulation and public improvement plan for the area. City of Baldwin Park Zoning Code The City of Baldwin Park Zoning Code (Chapter 153 of the Municipal Code) implements the Land Use Element of the General Plan and provides specific development and land use standards for the City of Baldwin Park. Section 153.002 of the Zoning Code states that the purpose of the Zoning Code is to "permit the most compatible use of land within the city, consistent with the Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.7-$ ESA / D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3, Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures ......... ......... .e, ........- 3.7 Land Use needs of residential, commercial and industrial developments within the city, and the promotion of the public health, safety, welfare and general prosperity of the city and its residents." 3.7.3 Thresholds of Significance In accordance with Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, the project could have a significant impact on land use and planning if it would: • Physically divide an established community; • Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect; or • Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. As discussed in the Initial Study/NOP prepared for the proposed project (see Appendix A), the proposed project would not conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan; therefore, this topic is not further discussed. 3.7.4 Methodology Land use impacts are assessed based upon the physical effects related to land use compatibility (for example, air quality, aesthetics, and circulation) and consistency with adopted plans and regulations. Specifically, this section of the EIR addresses the potential environmental impacts related to compatibility and/or consistency with regard to on-site and adjacent land uses and applicable plans and regulations. 3.7.5 Impact Analysis Impact 3.7-1: Physically divide an established community. Currently, the Specific Plan area contains a mix of uses, including commercial, residential, government/public, industrial, and recreational uses, as described above. The proposed project would introduce a TOD pattern to the Specific Plan area, which would include higher density housing and commercial development, as well as improvements to the circulation infrastructure, in order to accommodate all modes of transportation, including increasing opportunities for pedestrians and cyclists. Development occurring under the proposed Specific Plan is anticipated to occur over a 20 -year period and would involve infill development. New public plazas would also be created within currently underutilized parcels or City -owned spaces. Streetscape improvements would involve reconfiguration of streets within the Specific Plan area in order to accommodate wider sidewalks, mid -block pedestrian crossings, bicycle lanes, and other pedestrian -oriented features such as Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.7-9 ESA / D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures _..--_-__ ......... 3.7 Land Use landscaping and benches. All changes occurring as part of the streetscape improvements would occur within the existing rights-of-way of the roadways within the Specific Plan area. In some areas, alleyways would be converted to pedestrian walkways in order to create greater pedestrian connectivity between key destinations throughout the Downtown area. The infill development and streetscape improvements would is intended to result in a safer and more efficient circulation pattern throughout the Downtown area. Overall, the proposed project would build upon the existing community to increase the density/intensity of development as well as the presence of pedestrians throughout the Specific Plan area. The existing community would not be divided. No housing or existing development would be displaced and no new streets or other infrastructure would be constructed that would require displacement of existing development. Overall, the proposed Specific Plan would provide for additional residential development and improved connectivity within the existing community, and would not result in the division of an established community. Therefore, this impact would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation required Significance Determination: Less than significant Impact 3.7-2: Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the proposed project (including, but not limited to, the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. As described in detail below, the proposed Specific Plan would be consistent with applicable regional and local goals and policies that are intended to avoid or mitigate adverse environmental effects. Impacts related to this criterion would be less than significant. SCAG Table 3.7-2 lists the policies from SCAG's 2012-2013 Regional Transportation PlanlSustainable Communities Strategy, the 2008 Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide, and the Compass Growth Vision and 2 Percent Strategy that are relevant to the proposed Specific Plan, and provides a discussion of the proposed Specific Plan's level of consistency with each policy. SCAG policies focus largely on achieving jobs and housing balance within individual communities throughout the region, encouraging development patterns and densities that reduce infrastructure costs and reliance on the automobile and promote public transit use, minimizing environmental impacts through the use of "green" building techniques and landscaping practices, providing affordable housing, and minimizing new development in open space areas and areas with limited emergency access. As described under the regional context of the Environmental Setting section above, the San Gabriel Valley is currently largely comprised of communities with suburban development patterns, which are defined by small commercial pockets surrounded typically by large single - Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.7-10 ESA / D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 ""'., ......... 3, Environmental :rafnig, Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3.7 Land Use family residential neighborhoods. This development pattern has contributed to unbalanced jobs and housing ratios for San Gabriel Valley communities as well as health issues related to poor air quality. Residents lack opportunities to walk or bike to local destinations or transit stations due to the increased reliance on automobiles that this type of development promotes. As previously noted, SCAG policies seek to encourage higher density developments (commercial and residential) concentrated near public transit centers. The proposed Specific Plan would implement many of the SCAG policies related to high-density, infill development that is centered around public transit opportunities. The proposed Specific Plan would involve providing for infill development in an already developed urban area that would make use of the existing circulation and utility infrastructure. The proposed Specific Plan would introduce high-density residential uses, thus creating a mixed-use environment in which residents would benefit from nearby shopping and employment opportunities. New development would be within walking distance of the Baldwin Park Metrolink station, The proximity of the Specific Plan area to public transportation lends an even greater regional significance to the proposed project. Thus, the Specific Plan would be consistent with SCAG goals to reduce the prominence of the suburban development pattern that exists throughout the San Gabriel Valley and increase the availability of transit=oriented development. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.7-11 ESA! D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 U) W U J O a C9 Q U U) 2 F- F - U N LLI ti ai O w J a m M aW F- U) 0 IL O a X H u O a `m a E Z T c) O a jz h• v, N N N I �2 � ®� T �> _ O GS a VOi w O Q U C m C O "O Q) N 3 co U m m O 7 O C N E c E 2- E � m m E c p --2 ' N 0 ca O o a m'm mw = c p m N m O N N m Q p O O C C c9 N m L N N ip =3(U C y 0 N m C, L p _m 0 3 N Q ' N N T N () N C 3 yO m cgi? m a) O F- E -mo m m Q Q O ac) a) OC m a)C L) E p3 m (0,)) S) a) Co CL a) a)Q— F- m Q'U E:G w X_ ` � a) >, t: ic na w 0.0 E T a) oLg S E m •N me .p a) Q !=- ca m U) (D (D � E Q N U Q-- .. 30 y aa) E L ,O > C N m cA > U O > y S> O� C 01- 3 C CA y m r- a) a) QC > C_ T= V) F Y Q C L m C m N a) m U CD y C:2cl) E O N C, a) OU C rom75 oEmc O o�E IE Q303 3.�.0 �_Qy 3 3 O a) @ 3: CD 3� C 3 m O 3 3 C y 0- y y- 0 —0 C- �, y0 C 3(D N m N _r_ __ m'ma)N O T c6 'U .y. C L m�NO c U NNC C'0 m m a N L •x a W -2Z O O d V= Zn a a) TO N U a a C 0 .- U a) �. U _ U O U c p U U N C S �a M.0 U c C j a) �p a) U m W a) T c a) m 0 m f Q c a) m ro f/1 p0 co f/) m O M C C M C a) (n Y d 0 +N' N 0 M w N ca N Y Lo p O N O o 0 C ate) a E y N O O '� � y Y C O N C p N c O. a) y N O c0 a) C N O O -p .rte' O y U O� O oCo nE E m oLoa) cL0 0 nE oca�if6 a'3 Q2 o�a)� Qm-0 oceans nQ(n 2 a) ) p) (D (u y a) d a) - O a) () N N a) M y m L y C a) M L Y L y_ F- y� L O w U F- Ca co L N U F- C C C L a) 3 a) ~� :5 c C V C .~ aa77 C !" a U c C tyil C C :. a) c '6 : T c c 7 a) j mL EL .2 .2 c n a) a? � c� m g m y@ .? o� 0 y 2 3 U N �O N N N 3 a' U C) cn O) 3 U y Q 0 CA Q o 2 U o o Q N o V p o Qm o- m 0 o m U'b � U U o m cc U'� « U � 0 U co :5 (D U w w m c) C O oN 0 N � O _ m Q a) c w a) E C C a c C ,r. -:N C J+ > � Oco U .m '0N en C CD E N a) O - U m CD 0)E 'O -0o E ami >` m m c f0 O V O m W C T N a) 6 C c 0 O O N o d C N N a m O- o c o 30 m o N y y _ f0 m rn m Q`o n E a) w c L c m ac) U m Q (A L ca C p L p N N N cA O C U ;,Y a) ca c c C 3 U 'O C O a, E 'co C a) N a) Q > U C 3 C C O E m w a) a) >, m $ m m E2 co w c-0 o) N "'' a) a) N m N 0 >, c N E m m E U ca m L a > y 3 02 ca ca N LU N a` x O N U a00"c3A N <CL U p wE I �2 ®� L U N C:: GS a 3a m ay m m c � =3S (L)W O 7 O C N vi 'y Ll. C c C V y O U p --2 ' N c 3 o oa) 00--o m c m 3 CO O m > 7 N m Y L C c 3 a) ` w' Mu O` ,U N U =3(U c y E o U Q N Q O O N () N C D>N N �C) N U d O a > C Y C N m m a) C U y m a) 3 N CL •O y_ a 3 cmc 3 w X_ ` � coQ3• v a) a m c) 2 N E Q N W U d •- N 3 y Q U) () m Q !=- ca m U) (D (D � a � m 3 -p Cym►-•- N co 0 -mm y >,M'C a) -, ate) a) O 7 8.0-6 O O N _ Q> Q C ` a)m a) a)0 V) F Y Q F-> C: U O�aa))U O N A) -3:E a) OU C rom75 oEmc a m a) UCOO L)) U U mm 0. N m r' _r_ U 3 � M C a) N i+ 3 N L •x a) L O N m N 3 3 �a M.0 c cc N Q L > D1 m c c a) m ro L'N L) OL aa))E Ec N a C_ p m O O O O f�6 O U 'p � O m m C cj 7 U M N O a) � T N C U •� U L+ N O N Q� a)LO 0) , a) C rn - j O , O N N O N C n O.y.= C A Ww W cp);a a� v� va yro O oa 0 0 ~c vi Mo sL U U cc � W C) O m c) U) W U J O a Q U U) cU wW C 7 00 v N a- ~ W M U) WO J d m0 H Q' a EN N N . Y L O O L E (D 0 Y U 0 C O C a) 01 O c C 0) an O Q E N a7 a C7 a) q L 0-42 L .0 E _ c C C -0 L C C j j C c� 7 N �(a cca U) E(Duu) X00) > �N'aNi° E mF� 'c° c�=p m> S E o M E W E O a) a) o c a) 7 d a) N M- c Vi U Y C u) d) 2 C L U U `:3 m a N`O a, o 0 o rna>00 S c `o x C'U0 a) m o Cn0c6 E a`) �2E... •N U 'h N C > C 'Nil uoi E N N U 0 a) U ..-. _T U co O C 0- U '> O L a) 'V « w0 V) cG L N U C c� Y m a) C C a N a 7 C_ N O o 0) .0.1 O d � M 7 ' a) P CO a) C a O 0) O a) '—E- r 2i a N N Q d O O O p c E n� @ 'co) 4O a -0 N 0 0 O U O c6 W U N N cB a) -0 G) O o N � C ca 0 N a a) w- 3 C0 a) Y >, U a) O T� E �- N 0 a) C O N a U� •0 C 0= N o U Q O c6 > N a— O cu 5, O C U ca O 0 c) N U� 0 O a cu � C Q O` C O d O c N ' 0 U) C C O a L p N p 0-0 � 3210 C a C -3.2 a aa) o'o o aai o)Q E� co oc c � o aci >, (D Z a O o' M 3 C � O C (9 N a) — C 0 O U 7 a) N C a] p C p a✓ 0 00. n «` U C O a) N a) C L ci C O O a C E a) 8.2-0, c: LciL N U O D Q a aS a (D Q) ) a �° a) �) N a c 'U C C O C Q a O p O (6 C a) :0 () > C p E a) •- 0- U C c 2 a) a) LP c9 L 7 C .. O S 0 Q U c w Y C a1 Caa U E a) d) -0 Z =3 d 0 U.N a) .L..� ` E w- O Q O TM a L a) U OL LHa a) O O C L E a) a) N o a m U a) p 7 C O L O 7 >1 C O.L.. (n > a) a) >' O a7 'L' T O a1 01 a3 m C 7 Z, U) a) _ ,-. a) U) a3 y U a) O w 0 0 0 N O w= N_ C C E O Q L_ >s O: _T a C O a L 0 O O "' a N ca ... a a3 C .2 H w U V QE M c c v C o u) O Lr-. 7 nL > 5L co C !� E� N N a) 0Do-`m m N C a N a� o aEi ca. O` E W a N p C Q. C du a) n d l C T O cn• > C O a) "L" QL O N C O- U C C •N O D C w N 0i QL C N U N M a w a) 0 n N a) L n O U U Cn j> Cp) a0 L O O •0) ) �- 0 co L O O L >7 a) L C" N N L N V a L U (/) a3 ~ a) E O N a H- M F- 3i N H n U H U) a) o F- ri O O c ~= O C cc4 O N N L C 7 O "" -0C S L C j 7 m C .6 m c' C !" N N p c ca C C O c 0 ffi c: C (cu oco C E w O Ewa m E oa)'D2 > 0 mou) N c2 u) C— ip co N C 30�aEi N O C > — N N N N O p C Q) N C p N C U LN`4 _ C L_ C 2 a7 a) .L-1 E c� 0 X O_ C E` T a c HL�� Uaa))> Uai�� C(3 (2a Uo22.S� C) C) 3 CL Ucmo M 0 N a) rLO. N S O E CO) 3 w a) N U a✓ L U a a C C a) i r caa T, 20 -0 C: a) o o' c a) o Y ENN� S o NE o ovi iacn ca o a) no a C!' ¢ o,Q w„ o Kn m o �E o a) C u) E (D 1' N �o �'? a a) cQ q 0 "aao N a y0 4 Ecoc O ma) ro N EN,. Q L O T— >i 0 7 O O O O. O 0) 0 O N N 7 d a) 0 U) Q) N N a) O N U ?i .�+ a .:� d 14 Q) ..L. c > N CD +`- a c qC5 {�? Vl _ L a) cu N y a) E U L:E- C Y N� N 0) 0 0 7 N '- C U E C 'X U_ --E E C) C O a) N N E '> TL -0 0T) N N. a) C L 0) N 7 C1.0 U N .E o c v 'o t)r_�w -L) .L-• E E'o 46 E U C C O. O E N EO O N C fa p) •70 d .L-. 'y O U O l C N U N pj) U c6 O O N ""f C cn C U a) CU C a) a) O O N N O 0 a 0 C 0 0 O a1� > > a O C o CCU: n cD a C C - a) O O C O C O N L) C m S O U O a) N C' a) O 4, 'cq 0 a) O N '0) O O y a f6 O N C. d O _ ;aa C 'c6 ;yip. .a A U_ 0 U X aCC .0 .- co N U O C C ca 0 p> O •=� ` C n• L (d a U 'N N C.L. Q 0 � C O N a) U a) a) s U O a L O O O T N ca O a) 0) N O �_ a) >� (6 L a .L... N V a N cn O(D) co C C O � N C j a > •((pp ca () ca •0 L V) C O w ca 2+ U O` n" AG .5 -E X a O C U Q+N„ N C O X C c7 O> n 0 O U cn c U N U Q O O O u; a) N a) `—° o °� a) O c6 O n C O H o c� 0) U 0) C c4 ESC- E O a? d m 1= n m C C 0) O O) O) o C 0 0) a N N a) C U o V a O CY C nn QE u'..'G"7 O mC U O n2'j n. O > C U ca = 0 c a) a) 0'. 7 C a) a) -Y C-2 7 U (nNo m y a y C m W oEa) (ncaa U) CL r., ch Waw>� W e �� L `= L a) N 11 n E O 7 ppd C7 LO co M O) � � ® E Z >. -Mo C- O M ... O CO O M M M M M M q,- 0 UU U U U U U U c w a. o C7 C7 C7 0 C9 C7 0 C7 v V m 0) W U J O IL a U U) P cU t+ W C 7 0O N LL do M W W U) J 0 m °' a0 0. a LL O U Z W H U) N Z O U V C r N N C O U c O Z O T U C r N to C O U O C E ad+ to v T O IL a E 7 Z T V O IL m�p c C a) c -G N C co O Y C O) C N a) U 0 O � a c R R V m a)wLy a m m Nm C ®< Ea. N >' C > '� >' L O ca L 0 C d y W O N R N O fU0 • C 6 C Q y w D m `oma .O„ N sCs Y •N Of S O U L) LP > �p ya) YL a f6 2mE C E' o"_' U Q -Ow a) ac (4R J O RaUN a) E C. C O Q N O O` a 0 C N0) a) �' N m a L J Q a) CU m m J '0 > N Q m a) m E N Q U) a) y.., � O C O N-� T '� N �m i0ODc Lay)°m oo E m ECyo m C Q N O d a) :5 � m C J> U .0.. N N C ( L O C O N Q co F-- V N R a) L Of O C N a) a a y KM a) O a) N Qm • N O o — 3 J E N R R E 3 CD a) 16� cum C J U N U a) J °) a) ayi U N O Co ca N M U O O` C U C Q U C N C a) - 70 a) R N Q j N R ro c Q C N C N R O O m C d to .m O '� 'O L 7 R T a) L E a a) C O R 1- O a a) •O c "O N 0-5 N y O R R O N J L% C a C m d' O R O R C p0 C C iE EL C R co 'X a) R 0 a) c.5 w C C C C w R dC mm EL- a- RU o ma)02 Nm;> v5 -- N� Cl) ma) dy R a m -%4 aQf6E o R U Q U a) R Q p a) �°)o� Z R p U d o L c IL 'C Ir- C c)o 4= Ua a) 4_ Q �(n d N C Y Rc _— Q N `6Nom L N m° N U� Uc C O U�._Q >i a) w m :0.N N w N a) R � , . C Q C R 7 C O a) _ a) a) E a) •- Q in N a Y U) 2 (n a C a s cD N N ._ D j -a a o (n 7 'a 6 in a p co -p jp m 'O C CO C (aq C O) ca (0-0 N C L` +-• N ca 0 a a) ?� Cc C a) N O L O O R p a N 2 Q 7 C Q O E U a) w? N U E U N N R CO 1] N a Q a p Q .L -I L O a) Q •N O O 1 C O EL QO p_ N fna C U N a) to D O'"' Q L U) U)V R Q) U N O_C Q N O QN O— Qp R a) N O) C L C R a) y y L J a) a) L> N j w R L C a Q m N N a) E L m N O- N N T j N a) 7 L a a) N y c L J N f- H Y F N H p w a Q C _� U I-- N 'p L C(D C N R C Co O d C O C p c 41 •N p C a E p a) y p C p) a) o c C a) R C y N C E N C: 0 0 a) C Q Ln a) N E O D N a a, fn N c, C V m 4_ D a) •N R N O C y N> N a) N_ c m N 'y 'a y N C N_ L U N = N U cp a) U N O O m N p O •K N> Cl) O p X d U J O Q U V O C 0) 0 0 O p O a) O R R O ii C.O UE UUN.L-. U�CR C) Cir. i..)LR i�� ci E.L..3 a d C co >C R U y Z N N N a) p 0 N y� p o o g R •E c`mo O N a C Na)d O L a) m p) a) a) 2-1 C y O N O 0 U C Q N y R N a a) yEn N a p N C a E O O• C aC O U a) E 7 •O a) a) ` C C U O C D_ R a N R N c ai a) m a) C R Z � E y 0 y m a) 3 C O w •� T a) U) R O) "O N N d) 0) _� O C U N U Y N C a) L N Q a U_ _0 y a) O N U E L O O a) J > L N y U L R N C T C R N "' Q) 16 w 0 0 O 'OQ 'tu R R N Y y fO R j L C C 0.&d. U C N C U 00 -0 m ° E o6� c E•�E w y R cy J a) R d o Ra a) a) rnQ m O gma) .0 J Q aa) v c C cm C Z N N 42 O J C C E p 7 N o O N O p ,L,,, c y >,,_ N O E N R N m a) a) m` E C 0 a) C O M CD y C X> > Q a O m p N> Z C to R@ O E O C m y 7 m a) U y j > c C-. •q y V O N C C a) O a '� O m 7 O m a- N E", � R +O• O` C> 00 C a) C' E N a) N > C C NR C a) a) y v a Em2c w > OpN C�'N C O U oovUQ a) EmQ Q N m a a mm Ecya caa_R ymm d T `- my '✓0.p a 4= '02.2 N C a) O j> J p �. C E Q- E p, N p U R (6 J O) C O R O d A U C N 2-0 N R a ^a) .0°C > a)) � vi a) a� c m N > N _ rn� 3 E .E R ami J Qo E E '+p N •WNa)m U 'y •� -0Ca J m C .y Q.:.° .L..wU o •m aw a) C w m N wm0 "L-' L NCC a) J V L N C `p a) O) m e D a) W a) cm C O 2 E �Eui a) O) N N Y md�� a) O) N R mEay a) ,�. O) p E O N R m �E� O +� ++ m�� 7 p' � O m� 7 p moo 7 N J j 7 J 6 7 a m y 2•CQ J p 0 Q 6 O O �' C` 'o Q L C U a U `p Q U> U O U N D• N U N N C p O N C d> CJY, U J CL cQd. a J (` U) O +. C w o N J U) 7 C C w a) c w Q R a) m L C m m w E E N �. ' w n R¢ 7 a) W N a qaq')� O O C N' N L a) m ate+ Q M tim m� Na O 0 v r 7 I-- � 1V N N N N r -- x c Cl) ri Cl) cri vi ri c i c i ri a> C c w ^2 .2 2 C7 U CD C9 U` CD ( C7 U' (Dm n` I m U) W U J O a 0 Q U U) _H cU C 7 00 a ~ W M N WO -j a. co 40 0 - LL LL O } U Z W I -- U) N N Z O U a K (D a E 0 Z U 0 a O 0 N a) 0) m a w laa C O Ca •g'y -0 •N a) C O' a7 •� = f6 N 'U N w d a) a U a9 3.2 •0 O O O EoN O n O Q �cn C N n� a) 'lp3 O O «, >� :C'� .LO-. ��a �o aE It U wW> 09 C -0 a7 C a) f3 U m U.L.. ca mN d N m O N O C O -,)N ca m 0 M d C ccv m � m )(D ° -E amo o C, 7 -N > U U 7 >i U O) B C O` U N m C E in U a a m N d a 0 y "� L rn m C O a) N CL m O 7 o O 'p. C m as - n0 0 3 n0 U m c o = t C5k L .L- m 14 ” YxCa E m C C m C.2C 0'm N of N On X20 N U N a) •M V) 0) C y., 0 'O C > 0 a) C C O'y l6 U c Ua U 7 3 a) 0 a) 0) N C w c E r m E E m ID C 7 o O O U a9 3.2 •0 m a) N o o N oca ca. Eo C N U E a) 'lp3 O O «, >� :C'� .LO-. `o Q [••„Ty � m T 0 U �. � 04 U m Q9 t`Y N O c6 o N co m a"!;. PLATY ��C) •D ma � m )(D 0E a -01i EL N� Ow O .. C N C O E. U ar "U'. '4z N 7 a) a 2 O �w (D' m N C 0, N 7() oa N O O Oy, 22 7 Bo CCL ” YxCa a m c N d ca cpS ""1259kA c c0 y a)w X mG, easy -Qa) Ca axi U N Q) o Q a3ID E W a C C n m a) tl3 7 .� E d E U > ,,,, O` m m C O tJ CSA. S:5 .* G�9' E m c m �' > o a m m N N L CL E n poy, N O ci a N n O ti i15 Y. n as p C � O U 0 n -mom m r d 4U > 0 O N1 > ` a) O o`o a) 0) w c m a) E E m a CL O U C C N a) > L C 07 4 S1Y U) O (D .LO-. 'C � � •� T 0 U �. � 04 U m Q9 t`Y N � W ��C) � m N > E Ow .LC.. O O E. U ar "U'. '4z N 7 a) °4 45)S, 2c O N a m CllC a) c6 0, N LD N O O Oy, O U a) .L-. X. O G5..[�' �•q" N nw c "[ ID� n X .c Asa -Qa) v� 0. Sa o o E E > O a)a C C91 O C. L e C (0 .� E N (8'k P11 40. �E n a) -0� o 7 ,r� .* G�9' E m � �' > o a m m N N L C n poy, N O lD a) a N n O mO i15 Y. n as p U a moa) ), U p) n -mom m Y 4U > S Nn N1 > ` C N _m 0- r C. Ccd f9. [.) O .E C"1. pd�.. n — 2 O,. "'�. U N a oa a) ') a) CmW9 U n �•(=/i v ra �O?' a) m C 'o 0&9,= a) •fiY O�),c0 CN ,D E n D E"i .= 00 an7 0.0 n 7 > a L L L C 49 O w w P m a c N 0 = 7 a RC5 tti N N C N C C C m 7 C C N L; O N L.. 'O C p7., 1"" ` d°1 ✓i C �b p O, .® 'N w E J L ZZ0U �� O O �kS iA d C O C N UY a) � C L_ r- 73 CL U rG 0o = i F E C1 E (S U w U K 5 c0 a) m 0) 6 m •N C CX a) O (D a) q N U m N c6 � m N > E 7 m N Cm N 7 LD c ) m 0 'c c n X E m ca c o E E N Nm o E > m N O U n y a m aa) E m � �' > o a m m N N L C n Y > a U co d C > m 0 m c y E m o o o O C E O N a) 7 •N m a) O' O a) co 11 C ccO D O L a)m N S > a N l4 T C C4 N m w m m a c 0 0 = 0 0 U7 7 U 7 U O O E O O w E J L w d d c0) a d N M N M N N N a a. a a d U C0.7 1 U) W J O CL 0 Q U cn C Ci rW C 7 0O N (L ~ W M U) WO J d m0 H CL CL LL O U Z W U) Z O U V e N U) r- 0 O V C O Z O C c N (A C O v O C m E a) N co F v O IL Q m E Z V O a � Y N a) C ` a) f6 a) p In E °- fa 0.L-• IT O c- c: �� IL w (6 N C 7 fa C U C C n O O .L - U EooaLmlL—O L 5�Om _ a)o O N N 7 U 'C C L O m 3 O C= N C N 'C m (6 f6 •0 O TU �E C a)L fa = cu-w-� C a)m N U rn U .o N w c N 2 m .0 C O 7 o 7 c a) p N- CO _T O c C •' N f6 a) N N N O E C m a) c N n aNi _> w o n o X K C _ EL~f6(Dcu E Oo'onn� E Ec> m� O N E O T �O H C Q W O V N> C C N N n a) ' N a) a) o f6 to a) C d o .. �U a) m oa_ oL E rn E cuUj �.y L -CaC O 0 0 -06 C O 0 w O n s N N O CO a) N n n o N L O a .0 O a N U y T C N °) 3 N � CO:) CD -6 -o a) `I � C 'o � 4; �_ � a) � O' �6E�°2) -F,,fo 5-a)�cn 3oc �•>> =c f0 0 0 C O m y O O U L =O d U 3 p C O U U a) �= C E p > n- m .- a) _ = C N C C N0 n O).N a (6 f6 0 i9 C a) >, a) DC a5 a) .O v,C a) N d U N o fa a 0 a C C d C a) CD U T N a w w o m p G w a) O) y p 4 f6 -`�E ac)i N U vLv z, S U v• C -O p a) a) a) a) a) y N w2„ a) a) O C, N a) '� O C a n •c U C n p 111-o N C)' -,.Q f0 u) LL N U) Y U) '-' C f0 Q U) L � U) �[ a) U � 4o 6 15 am of �o �"� act o0 `mom a.) m o c o aci- c c&;- a) o o-0 0-6 Y C n•- a' .O. o o N a n p T a) O C y) a) 2-6 O •N y d M O C O O U) nC� `n0 f0 'O af6 mc: �O� p nLL na) O 2 7 L ca a (� N .Q = d L m L U 'VE U) L N L p L I- m v r F L H C L ID Z c O N E O C C 17 d 'O a) C a) O C .0 L C 01 y to as O p p y N) y 0 f6 7 y y o-3, y> c 2 y N a) a) cm enp. •a) a) n N O N ?.i c ""• ` M. N L y a) O •O O C N C a) N O O d O C a) u) a) O> U O "" O C U ash -D.5 U o U cc dCL U� U m U as t f0 ti CO CD O L a1 N N U o E c : m L p f6 N N L a) co L fa a a� a) •U U L) N .T. N N C m 7 N T C: C_ p C _ fi7 T _ •E •�' v0 O N N L V a) w p f0 _0 C w O C Vl C T @ 5.2) a) N a) N a) N a) N 6 N N U O O C C D > j O a) O U w6 a) a) O- U E C N o •EE a v� o UU) U o a) E E c E c n n E= :9 o y o Z O m U) C N a) a) L) _ a) a) m a) m N O E aC E `c aa) (D U m a) ani .L- C C p (D a) _ N T a) O r- O 0. d U C > M O d y > •U a) N O 0 U N _ U) d L CO LL O D f0 ti CO 3. Environmental Setting impacts and Mitig. .m._ 3 1 Lard Use Baldwin Park General Plan The proposed Specific Plan would involve infill development and redevelopment of underutilized parcels within walking distance to the existing Metrolink station. The Specific Plan includes rezoning and amending General Plan land uses of specific parcels within the project area to introduce a transit -oriented development pattern to the area. As summarized in Table 2-5 in Chapter 2, Project Description, the proposed Specific Plan would change the General Plan land uses on a very small portion (approximately 5.7 acres) of the Specific Plan area. Overall, development allowed by the proposed Specific Plan would be consistent with the existing land use designations in the Downtown area. In addition, the proposed Specific Plan project would be consistent with the General Plan policies for the Downtown area, including the creation of a pedestrian district with a 24-hour presence, providing a mix of multi -family and commercial uses, and providing a pedestrian link with the Metrolink platform and City Hall (see Table 3.7-3, below). TABLE 3.7-3 CONSISTENCY OF PROPOSED PROJECT WITH BALDWIN PARK 2020 GENERAL PLAN POLICIES Policy # Policy Text Consistency Statement Land Use Element Ralwoed Development in RoldwIn Park 1.1Provide opportunities for housing development at a range of densities and housing types that Consistent Ttae proposed Specific Plan would introduce a variety of housing In the Specific Plan area that would include accommodate the varied interestsand needs of medium- and high-density iaotusinxg. present and future residents. ensure that Impacts on residences are minlinized. 1.4 Create opportunities for two di9forent levels of Consistent The proposed Specific Plan would Involve con,imercial development: (1) countxrerrtal uses that meet the retail and service need,, of local resident development of neighborhood -serving retall. In addition the proposed Specific Plan targets cornmercially zoned areas such and employee populations, and (2) regional -serving retail commercial businesses that capture revenues as the northwest corner of Rarnona and Saildwln Park Boulevards as areas where lifestyle centers could be developed' from a broader population base. that would attract both local and regional shoppers. 1.6 Encourage mixed-tuse development of residential, Consistent. The proposed Specific Plan would provide new retail, and commercial uses In Downtown and along mixed-use development throughout Downtown. the North Maine Avenue conidor as defined in the Land Use Policy Map and under the Mixed Use designation. Compatible and ComplementaryDevelopment 2,5 Require that multi -fainly, cornmerclai and industrial development provide adequate buffers (stick as Consistent. The proposed Specific flan includes design standards that include setbacks, and each project within the decorative walls and landscaped setbacks) at the Specific Plan area would implement the retluired buffers to designated boundaries with adjacent uses to prevent ensure that Impacts on residences are minlinized. Impacts on residences due to noise, traffic, parking, light and glare, and differences in scale to ensure privacy; and to provide visual ccampatibilil,y. Revitalization and Deteriorating Uses 3.1 Encourage and contunu re use of redevetopment zactivities, ind uding provision of Incentives for private development, joint public-private partnerships, and public jmprovernents in designated Redevelopment Project Areas. 3.2 Provide development ticenfives to facilitate the consolidation of individual parcels along the City's commercial corridors and in industrial districts. Consistent. The proposed Specific Plan provides for redevelopment within the Downtown area. Consistent. The proposed Specific Plan includes consolidation of parcels to enhance the commercial and residential uses in the Specific Plan area. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.7-17 ESA! D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures ........ 3.1 Land Use Policy # Policy Text 3.4 Encourage rehabilitation of existing commercial facades and signage. 3.7 As part of the neighborhood beautification effort, provide street trees and landscaping in the public rights-of-way. ........ .......... ---- ------ Focus Area. DownfownAfairol nk 8.1 Provide for a mix of commercial and multi -family residential uses up to 30 units/acre to create 24-hour activity in the Downtown. Allow mixed-use development to consist of vertical integration of commercial and residential uses, as well as mixed uses side by side, on a lot -by -lot basis. 8.2 Define Downtown as a pedestrian overlay zone, and require that new uses and buildings enhance pedestrian activity (refer to techniques outlined in Policy 3.1 of the Urban Design Element) 8.3 Prohibit the use of areas between the sidewalk and a building within the pedestrian orientation zone for parking. 8A Encourage the development of outdoor cafes, flower sales, stalls or kiosks, and other uses which are compatible with and stimulate pedestrian activity. 8.5 Restrict non -pedestrian friendly uses (e.g., offices) to 25 percent of the ground floor of any block in this zone. Consistency Statement Consistent. The proposed Specific Plan includes facade and signage design guidelines that would be used to enhance the facades of new development as well as existing development. Consistent. The proposed Specific Plan contains a streetscape program, including landscaping recommendations along all public rights-of-way. Consistent. The proposed Specific Plan would provide for a maximum density of 30 units per acre of residential development in some areas. The project proposes mixed-use development at a density sufficient to create a mixed-use environment consisting of commercial and multi -family residential uses that would help create a 24-hour community, and would vertically integrate residential above commercial development. Consistent. The proposed Specific Plan would implement a pedestrian network throughout the Specific Plan area and would include landscaped pathways and pedestrian amenities. Consistent. All sidewalks throughout the Specific Plan area would be adjacent to the buildings. Consistent. The proposed Specific Plan would allow for outdoor cafes and other kiosks. Consistent. The proposed Specific Plan may involve development of office space, but not at a greater ratio than 25 percent of the ground floor area of any block within the Downtown/Metrolink Focus Area. 8.6 Provide an area for limited commercial uses Consistent. The proposed Specific Plan would include immediately south of the Metrolink platform and commercial uses near the Metrolink station. adjacent to the Park and Ride area directed towards serving Metrolink riders. Establish a pedestrian bridge between the Metrolink platform and Downtown. 8.7 Create an active "paseo" in the courtyard of City Consistent. The proposed Specific Plan would provide many Hall. Provide pedestrian connections to Downtown. new pedestrian connections throughout Downtown, including more direct pedestrian connections with City Hall as well as a new civic plaza across from City Hall. 8.8 Pursue redesign of automobile -oriented shopping Consistent. The proposed Specific Plan would involve centers on Maine Avenue (Albertson's Center and development of mixed use development along Maine Avenue Maine Avenue Marketplace) to orient some that would orient the buildings towards the street, as well as commercial uses towards Maine Avenue, and placing them next to the street, and parking would be located provide direct pedestrian access off Maine. behind the buildings. 8.9 Work in conjunction with Chamber of Commerce to Consistent. The proposed Specific Plan would allow for and attract family-oriented entertainment uses to the encourage retail uses that could include a cinema and other Downtown, such as an arcade for youth, bowling, family-oriented uses. skating rink, etc. 8.11 Pursue development of a Specific Plan for the Consistent. The proposed project includes creation of a Specific Downtown to provide further direction on the precise Plan for the Downtown area in order to guide land use land use, circulation and public improvement plan for development and related circulation and public improvement the area. plans. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.7-18 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 Policy # Policy Text Urban Design Element Downtown m.. _ ......... , _ ....... 3.1 Define Downtown as apedestrian-overlay zone and require that new uses and buildings enhance pedestrian activity through the use of: • Walls which are aesthetically treated by the use of color, textured materials, offset planes, recessed entries and windows, columns, and other architectural details to provide visual interest to pedestrians. • Extensive landscaping, including trees, flowering shrubs and groundcover. • Pedestrian amenities, such as street furniture, trash receptacles, and signage oriented to the pedestrian. • Design amenities related to the street level, such as awnings, colonnades, arcades and paseos. • Visual access to the interior of buildings. City of Baldwin Park Zoning Ordinance hviparts and Kfig afi i Measures 31 Land Use Consistency Statement Consistent. Jhe proposed project involves creation of a Specific Plan that lncludes an extensive new pedestrian network throughout Downtown, as well as a detailed streetscape program that identities trey types and other greenery and street furniture to be placed on each street. The proposed project would establish development regulations that would be largely consistent with current zoning ordinance requirements. The proposed project would result in the reclassification of a few parcels that would be more consistent with the vision for the area established under the General Plan, which involve the establishment of a mixed-use area with enhanced pedestrian amenities to take greater advantage of the area's proximity to regional transit opportunities. By comparison, the existing zoning regulations do not fully meet the purpose and intent of the General Plan or other regional planning principles. As the purpose of zoning regulations is to implement city and county plans and planning concepts, the proposed regulations would result in less than significant impacts related to consistency with plans and policies that have been adopted to avoid or mitigate environmental effects. Mitigation: No mitigation required Significance Determination: Less than significant Cumulative Impacts The cumulative study area for land use and planning include all areas within the City of Baldwin Park and areas within the City of Irwindale that are adjacent to the Specific Plan area. The Specific Plan area is a developed, urban area that contains a mix of uses, including commercial, residential, public facilities, and office uses. The Specific Plan proposes to rezone and amend General Plan land uses of specific parcels within the project area to introduce a transit -oriented development pattern to the area. The modifications to land uses by implementation of the proposed Specific Plan are consistent with the existing residential, commercial, and public land uses; and consistent with the related projects in the cumulative study area that are listed on Table Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.7-19 ESA / of 30953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3.1 Land Use 2-6, in Section 2.0 Project Description, which consist of infill and redevelopment of existing land uses that would provide new residential and commercial development. As described throughout this section, the proposed Specific Plan is consistent with applicable regulations and policies of the General Plan and other regional plans. The contribution of the proposed Specific Plan land uses and the cumulative planned developments, which are similar in nature, would not result in incompatible uses in an established community. Similar to the proposed Specific Plan, the related projects represent orderly, contiguous, and largely infill development that would reinforce the existing urban and developed character of the area. Because development provided by the Specific Plan would be consistent with uses in the surrounding area, adverse cumulative impacts related to land use and planning would not occur. Therefore, the proposed Specific Plan would not result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to any land use impacts. Significance Determination: Less than cumulatively considerable References — Land Use City of Baldwin Park, Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan, November 2002. City of Baldwin Park, Baldwin Park Zoning Code, Chapter 153 of the Municipal Code, as amended to, May, 2012. Southern California Association of Governments, Draft Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide, 2008. Southern California Association of Governments, Compass Blueprint, http://www.compassblueprint.org, accessed November, 2014. Southern California Association of Governments, Regional Transportation Plan 2012- 2035/Sustainable Communities Strategy, adopted April, 2012. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.7-20 ESA t D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures i 1 •' 617T"071 This section evaluates the potential for noise and groundborne vibration impacts to result from implementation of the proposed Specific Plan. This includes the potential for developments occurring in the Specific Plan area to result in impacts associated with a substantial temporary and/or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project site; exposure of people in the vicinity of the project site to excessive noise and groundborne vibration levels; and whether this exposure is in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance. Finally, mitigation measures intended to reduce impacts to noise and vibration are proposed, where appropriate, to avoid or reduce significant impacts of the proposed Specific Plan. Data used to prepare this analysis were obtained from the City of Baldwin Park General Plan, the City of Baldwin Park Municipal Code, and by measuring and modeling existing and future noise levels at the Specific Plan area and the surrounding land uses. Traffic information contained in the City of Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan Traffic Study (Appendix D) was used to prepare the noise modeling of traffic noise exposure. Noise is generally defined as unwanted sound. Sound, traveling in the form of waves from a source, exerts a sound pressure level (referred to as sound level) that is measured in decibels (dB), which is the standard unit of sound amplitude measurement. The dB scale is a logarithmic scale that describes the physical intensity of the pressure vibrations that make up any sound, with 0 dB corresponding roughly to the threshold of human hearing and 120 to 140 dB corresponding to the threshold of pain. Pressure waves traveling through air exert a force registered by the human ear as sound. The typical human ear is not equally sensitive to all frequencies of the audible sound spectrum. As a consequence, when assessing potential noise impacts, sound is measured using an electronic filter that deemphasizes the frequencies below 1,000 Hz and above 5,000 Hz in a manner corresponding to the human ear's decreased sensitivity to extremely low and extremely high frequencies. This method of frequency weighting is referred to as A -weighting and is expressed in units of A -weighted decibels (dBA). A -weighting follows an international standard methodology of frequency deemphasis and is typically applied to community noise measurements. Some representative noise sources and their corresponding A -weighted noise levels are shown in Figure 3.8-1. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.8-1 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 I I 1 i Y M 4 I I I I N I I 1 N r q 1 y I I I I Y j N N LL LL 11 N gcq N qI I I I N LL 25 I �i I I ick I I C7 p 1 y U2 y a dl I I I { I I p k 4 N I I I 1 I I I I V I 6 N I I I I I I I I I N V N I I I I I I I I N Y 4 q y I I I I N I I N V I M I I I I I Y I I Y y 6 t I I I I I q I l y I y y I I I I I y I N I to N 01 I i y eL 1i I I I I 1 Ip 1 I' I 1 I GI I I y� O Si c0 N cQ o us02 �- r 11111111 T 0) C r �• L�l C C CD O — O O Z CL p O W 0 a 3 v m R T 0) C r �• L�l C C CD O — O O Z CL p O W 0 a 3 v m R 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 18 Noise and Vibration Noise Exposure and Community Noise An individual's noise exposure is a measure of noise over a period of time. A noise level is a measure of noise at a given instant in time. The noise levels presented in Figure 3.8-1 are representative of measured noise at a given instant in time; however, they rarely persist consistently over a long period of time. Rather, community noise varies continuously over a period of time with respect to the contributing sound sources of the community noise environment. Community noise is primarily the product of many distant noise sources, which constitute a relatively stable background noise exposure, with the individual contributors unidentifiable. The background noise level changes throughout a typical day, but does so gradually, corresponding with the addition and subtraction of distant noise sources such as traffic. What makes community noise variable throughout a day, besides the slowly changing background noise, is the addition of short -duration, single -event noise sources (e.g., aircraft flyovers, motor vehicles, sirens), which are readily identifiable to the individual. These successive additions of sound to the community noise environment change the community noise level from instant to instant, requiring the measurement of noise exposure over a period of time to legitimately characterize a community noise environment and evaluate cumulative noise impacts. This time -varying characteristic of environmental noise is described using statistical noise descriptors. The most frequently used noise descriptors are summarized below: Leq: The Leq, or equivalent sound level, is used to describe noise over, a specified period of time in terms of a single numerical value; the Leq of a time -varying signal and that of a steady signal are the same if they deliver the same acoustic energy over a given time. The LeQ may also be referred to as the average sound level. L,n,x: The maximum, instantaneous noise level experienced during a given period of time. L,ni,,: The minimum, instantaneous noise level experienced during a given period of time. L,,: The noise level exceeded a percentage of a specified time period. The "x" represents the percentage of time a noise level is exceeded. For instance, L5o and L90 represents the noise levels that are exceeded 50 percent and 90 percent of the time, respectively. Ldd: Also termed the day -night average noise level (DNL), the L& is the average A -weighted noise level during a 24-hour day, obtained after an addition of 10 dBA to measured noise levels between the hours of 10:00 pm to 7:00 am to account nighttime noise sensitivity. CNEL: CNEL, or Community Noise Equivalent Level, is the average A -weighted noise level during a 24-hour day that is obtained after an addition of 5 dBA to measured noise levels between the hours of 7:00 pm to 10:00 pm and after an addition of 10 dBA to noise levels between the hours of 10:00 pm to 7:00 am to account for noise sensitivity in the evening and nighttime, respectively. Effects of Noise on People Noise is generally loud, unpleasant, unexpected, or undesired sound that is typically associated with human activity that is a nuisance or disruptive. The effects of noise on people can be placed into four general categories: Baldwin Park TDD Specific Plan Project 3.8-3 ESA I D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 3.8 Noise and Vibration • Subjective effects (e.g., dissatisfaction, annoyance) • Interference effects (e.g., communication, sleep, and learning interference) • Physiological effects (e.g., startle response) • Physical effects (e.g., hearing loss) Although exposure to high noise levels has been demonstrated to cause physical and physiological effects, the principal human responses to typical environmental noise exposure are related to subjective effects and interference with activities. Interference effects of environmental noise refer to those effects that interrupt daily activities and include interference with human communication activities, such as normal conversations, watching television, telephone conversations, and interference with sleep. Sleep interference effects can include both awakening and arousal to a lesser state of sleep. With regard to the subjective effects, the responses of individuals to similar noise events are diverse and are influenced by many factors, including the type of noise, the perceived importance of the noise, the appropriateness of the noise to the setting, the duration of the noise, the time of day and the type of activity during which the noise occurs, and individual noise sensitivity. Overall, there is no completely satisfactory way to measure the subjective effects of noise, or the corresponding reactions of annoyance and dissatisfaction on people. A wide variation in individual thresholds of annoyance exists, and different tolerances to noise tend to develop based on an individual's past experiences with noise. Thus, an important way of predicting a human reaction to a new noise environment is the way it compares to the existing environment to which one has adapted (i.e., comparison to the ambient noise environment). In general, the more a new noise level exceeds the previously existing ambient noise level, the less acceptable the new noise level will be judged by those hearing it. With regard to increases in A -weighted noise level, the following relationships generally occur: • Except in carefully controlled laboratory experiments, a change of 1 dBA cannot be perceived. • Outside of the laboratory, a 3 dBA change in noise levels is considered to be a barely perceivable difference. • A change in noise levels of 5 dBA is considered to be a readily perceivable difference. • A change in noise levels of 10 dBA is subjectively heard as doubling of the perceived loudness. These relationships occur in part because of the logarithmic nature of sound and the decibel system. The human ear perceives sound in a non-linear fashion, hence the decibel scale was developed. Because the decibel scale is based on logarithms, two noise sources do not combine in a simple additive fashion, but rather logarithmically. For example, if two identical noise sources produce noise levels of 50 dBA, the combined sound level would be 53 dBA, not 100 dBA. Noise Attenuation Stationary point sources of noise, including stationary mobile sources such as idling vehicles, attenuate (lessen) at a rate between 6 dBA for hard sites and 7.5 dBA for soft sites for each doubling of distance from the reference measurement. Hard sites are those with a reflective surface between Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.8-4 ESA! D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures - ,,, .,,,, .— 3,8 Noise and V _ __ bration the source and the receiver, such as asphalt or concrete surfaces or smooth bodies of water. No excess ground attenuation is assumed for hard sites and the changes in noise levels with distance (drop-off rate) is simply the geometric spreading of the noise from the source. Soft sites have an absorptive ground surface such as soft dirt, grass, or scattered bushes and trees. In addition to geometric spreading, an excess ground attenuation value of 4.5 dBA (per doubling distance) is normally assumed for soft sites. Line sources (such as traffic noise from vehicles) attenuate at a rate between 3 dBA for hard sites and 4.5 dBA for soft sites for each doubling of distance from the reference measurement (Caltrans, 1998). Fundamentals of Vibration As described in the Federal Transit Administration's (FTA) Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment (FTA, 2006), ground -borne vibration can be a serious concern for nearby neighbors of a transit system route or maintenance facility, causing buildings to shake and rumbling sounds to be heard. In contrast to airborne noise, ground -borne vibration is not a common environmental problem. It is unusual for vibration from sources such as buses and trucks to be perceptible, even in locations close to major roads. Some common sources of ground -borne vibration are trains, buses on rough roads, and construction activities such as blasting, pile -driving, and operation of heavy earth -moving equipment. There are several different methods that are used to quantify vibration. The peak particle velocity (PPV) is defined as the maximum instantaneous peak of the vibration signal. The PPV is most frequently used to describe vibration impacts to buildings. The root mean square (RMS) amplitude is most frequently used to describe the effect of vibration on the human body. The RMS amplitude is defined as the average of the squared amplitude of the signal. Decibel notation (VdB) is commonly used to measure RMS. The relationship of PPV to RMS velocity is expressed in terms of the "crest factor," defined as the ratio of the PPV amplitude to the RMS amplitude. Peak particle velocity is typically a factor of 1.7 to 6 times greater than RMS vibration velocity (FTA, 2006). The decibel notation acts to compress the range of numbers required to describe vibration. Typically, ground -borne vibration generated by man-made activities attenuates rapidly with distance from the source of the vibration. Sensitive receptors for vibration include structures (especially older masonry structures), people (especially residents, the elderly, and sick), and vibration sensitive equipment. The effects of ground -borne vibration' include movement of the building floors, rattling of windows, shaking of items on shelves or hanging on walls, and ittinbling somid . In extreme cases, the vibration can cause damage to buildings. Building damage is not a factor for most projects, with the occasional exception of blasting and pile -driving during construction. Annoyance from vibration often occurs when the vibration levels exceed the threshold of perception by only a small margin. A vibration level that causes annoyance will be well below the damage threshold for normal buildings. The FTA measure of the threshold of architectural damage for conventional sensitive structures is 0.2 in/sec PPV (FTA, 2006). In residential areas, the background vibration velocity level is usually around 50 VdB (approximately 0.0013 in/sec PPV). This level is well below the vibration velocity level threshold of perception for humans, which is approximately 65 VdB. A vibration velocity level of 75 VdB Baldwin Pare TOD Specific Plan Project 3.8-5 ESA I D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 3.8 Noise and Vibration is considered to be the approximate dividing line between barely perceptible and distinctly perceptible levels for many people (FTA, 2006). 3.8.1 Environmental Setting Existing Ambient Daytime Noise Levels Sources of noise in the City of Baldwin Park are typical of those found in other urban developed areas include, but not limited to, traffic, construction work, commercial operations, human activities, emergency vehicles, aircraft overflights, etc. The noise environment in the Specific Plan area is dominated by transportation -related sources, including traffic on the local roadway network and the activity of Metrolink trains. As described in the City's General Plan Noise Element, traffic noise on surface streets is a significant source of noise within the community (City of Baldwin Park, 2002). Within the Specific Plan area, major roadways that have been identified in the City's General Plan Noise Element as carrying substantial traffic volumes include Ramona Boulevard, Badillo Street, Baldwin Park Boulevard, Pacific Avenue, and Maine Avenue. The Baldwin Park Metrolink station serves the San Bernardino line, with as many as 38 Metrolink passenger trains and four Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) freight trains running through the station daily. These trains can run 24 hours a day for seven days a week (Metrolink, 2015). The San Bernardino Metrolink line connects Union Station in Downtown Los Angeles with San Bernardino. According to the City, the Metrolink line is a major noise source in the City, with passing trains generating noise levels up to 88.5 dBA at 100 feet, and passing train horn noise levels measuring as high as 99.2 dBA at 100 feet (City of Baldwin Park, 2002). In order to characterize ambient noise conditions in the Specific Plan area, a total of eight short- term noise level measurements were conducted on November 19, 2014, from 2:53 pm to 6:53 pm, at various locations throughout the Specific Plan area to provide a representative sample of daytime noise conditions. In addition, two long-term (24-hour) noise level measurements were also conducted on November 20, 2014 in the vicinity of the Metrolink line to provide noise data on the existing noise environment near this transportation noise source. One long-term noise measurement location was next to Ramona Boulevard, approximately 180 feet northwest of the Metrolink line; and the other long-term noise measurement location was next to Bogart Avenue, approximately 78 feet northwest of the Metrolink line. The noise surveys were conducted using Metrosonics Model db -3080 sound level meters, which were calibrated prior to use to ensure the accuracy of the measurements. The results of the long-term and short-term noise measurements are shown in Tables 3.8-1 and 3.8-2, respectively. The measurement locations are identified in Figure 3.8-2. Location 1. 14617 Ramona Boulevard TABLE 3.8-1 SUMMARY OF LONG-TERM NOISE MEAUREMENTS CNEL Dates dBA Lm, dBA Noise Sources 11/20/14 — 11/21/14 75.0 102.8 Likely rail and road noises. (11/0/14 Unattended noise measurements at 10:54 do not specifically identify noise P.M.) sources. Baldwin Paris TOD Specific Plan Project 3.8-6 ESA ( D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures _........... ...... _ 3.8 Noise and Vibration CNEL Location Dates dBA Lmax dBA Noise Sources 2. Across Bogart Avenue 11/20/14 - 11/21/14 75.2 110.4 Likely rail and road noises. from Metrolink rail line (11/20/14 Unattended noise measurements at 10:55 do not specifically identify noise P.M.) sources. TABLE 3.8-2 SUMMARY OF SHORT-TERM NOISE MEASURMENTS Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.8-7 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 Date and Time Location Period Le, dBA Lmax dBA Noise Sources 1. 4031 La Rica Avenue. 11/19/14 64.4 86.1 Traffic on La Rica Avenue; 02:53 - 03:08 P.M., pedestrians walking by; vehicles entering alleyway adjacent to noise monitor; vehicles accessing retail strip across the street. 2. Adjacent to Baldwin 11/19/14 64.5 80.0 Traffic on Baldwin Park Boulevard; Park Community 03:15 - 03:30 P.M. pedestrians walking by; aircrafts Center and across the overhead. street from Baldwin Park Library. 3. Adjacent to U.S. Post 11/19/14 63.7 85.6 Vehicles in post office parking lot; Office off of Maine 03:40 - 03:55 P.M. traffic on Maine Avenue and Avenue Palmrose Street; post office patrons opening and closing car doors; ambulance truck driving by with sirens. 4. Adjacent to single- 11/19/14 75.8 100.4 Traffic on Ramona Boulevard, family residence 04:01 - 04:16 P.M. Alderson Avenue, and Downing fronting Downing Avenue; car with loud muffler; rail Avenue signal sounding; train horn sounding. 5. Adjacent to surface 11/19/14 62.7 81.6 Traffic on Central Avenue; ambient parking lot off of 05:24 - 05:39 P.M, traffic noise from Downing Avenue; Central Avenue property gates opening; train horn sounding from afar; skateboarders; dogs barking; overhead helicopter. 6. Adjacent to multi -family 11/19/14 63.4 86.7 Traffic on Downing Avenue and residential building at 05:47 - 06:02 P.M. Chevalier Avenue; residents talking intersection of from afar; dogs barking in Downing Avenue and background; police sirens from afar; Chevalier Avenue rail signal sounds followed by train noise. 7. Baldwin Park United 11/19/14 61.7 71.0 Traffic on Maine Avenue. Methodist Church 06:13 - 06:28 P.M, 8. Adjacent to multi -family 11/19/14 57.6 71.2 Traffic on Baldwin Park Boulevard residential building 06:38 - 06:53 P.M. and Sterling Way; train horns in the near intersection of background; car sounding alarm; Sterling Way and pedestrians talking on Baldwin Park Baldwin Park Boulevard; helicopter overhead; Boulevard. dog barking in background. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.8-7 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures _. ........ 1,111,,, 3.8 Noise and Vibration Existing Roadway Noise Levels Existing roadway noise levels were calculated for 60 roadway segments located within and in proximity to the Specific Plan area. The roadway segments selected for analysis are considered to be those that are expected to be most directly impacted by project -related traffic; which, for the purpose of this analysis, includes the roadways that are located within and immediately adjacent to the Specific Plan area. These roadways, when compared to roadways located further away from the Specific Plan area, would experience the greatest percentage increase in traffic generated by buildout under the Specific Plan. Calculation of the existing roadway noise levels was accomplished using the Federal Highway Administration Highway Noise Prediction Model (FHWA-RD-77-108) and traffic volumes at the study intersections analyzed in the project's traffic study. The model calculates the average noise level at specific locations based on traffic volumes, average speeds, and site environmental conditions. The average daily noise levels along these roadway segments are presented in Table 3.8-3. TABLE 3.8-3 EXISTING ROADWAY NOISE LEVELS Roadway Roadway Segment dBA CNELa West of Merced Avenue 69.4 East of Merced Avenue 69.2 West of Stewart Avenue 69.1 East of Stewart Avenue 69.0 West of Baldwin Park Boulevard 69.6 East of Baldwin Park Boulevard 68.8 West of Cesaer Chavez Drive 68.9 East of Cesaer Chavez Drive 68.7 Ramona Boulevard West of Maine Avenue 68.9 East of Maine Avenue 68.6 West of Bogart Avenue 67.9 East of Bogart Avenue 68.3 West of Downing Avenue 68.2 East of Downing Avenue 68.4 West of Badillo Street 68.4 North of Badillo Street62.1 West of Puente Avenue 69.0 Badillo Street East of Puente Avenue 1111... 68.4 � .........,. _ r,....._. 1 .... .. .......___. ..West of Maine Avenue 68.1 Los Angeles Street East of Maine Avenue 67.1 ®� - West of Maine Avenue 59.6�� Clark Street East of Maine Avenue 58.7 Palmrose Street ......... East of Maine Avenue 52.7 Bogart Avenue East of Pacific Avenue54 __ „ m._. _. 7 .... West of Pacific Avenue 49.3 Downing Avenue East of Pacific Avenue 57.1 Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.8-9 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 3.8 Noise and Vibration Roadway Roadway Segment dBA CNELa West of Pacific Avenue 57.0 Big Dalton Avenue East of Pacific Avenue . ------- 41.3 .,,.,M.,, ...., .. ........ ..._......._. ........� West of"�. Merced Avenue 68.5 Baldwin Park Boulevard East of Merced Avenue 68.7 ...........................w, North of Ramona Boulevard 64.3 South of Ramona Boulevard 64.4 Merced Avenue North of Baldwin Park Boulevard 64.8 South of Baldwin Park Boulevard 66.1 North of Ramona Boulevard 58.9 Stewart Avenue South of Ramona Boulevard 57.7 North of Ramona Boulevard 67.9 Baldwin Park Boulevard South of Ramona Boulevard 68.1 Cesaer Chavez Drive North of Ramona Boulevard -- ..__.._ 55.1 ® ...... ---- - North of Los Angeles Street 66.7 South of Los Angeles Street 64.0 North of Clark Street 63.9 South of Clark Street 64.0 Maine Avenue North of Palmrose Street 64.1 South of Palmrose Street 64.0 North of Ramona Boulevard 63.9 South of Ramona Boulevard ...___. - 64.0 _.... .. .. .... ... m 6� ................ North of B. ogart Avenue 69.1 South of Bogart Avenue 69.1 North of Downing Avenue 69.1 Pacific Avenue South of Downing Avenue 69.1 North of Big Dalton Avenue 69.0 ......... South of Big Dalton Avenue ....... .... - ........ 68.9 _. -------- ...--- .,, North of Ramona Boulevard 57.7 Bogart Avenue South of Ramona Boulevard 53.5 North of Ramona Boulevard 53.6 Downing Avenue South of Ramona Boulevard 55.2 Lozano Drive South of Ramona Boulevard .. 47.6 ....... ...... ..... _ _.....-_. ---- North of Badillo Street 58.0 Puente Avenue South of Badillo Street 61.4 a Values represent noise levels at 50 feet from the centerline of each roadway. TRAFFIC INFORMATION SOURCE: The Mobility Ground, 2014. TABLE SOURCE: ESA, 2015. Calculation data and results provided in Appendix D. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.8-10 ESA f of 30953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3, Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 3.8 Noise and Vibration Existing Groundborne Vibration Levels As described previously, some common sources of ground -borne vibration include trains, buses on rough roads, and construction activities such as blasting, pile -driving, and operation of heavy earth -moving equipment. Within the Specific Plan area, passenger trains associated with the San Bernardino Metrolink Line passes by the Baldwin Park Metrolink Station on a daily basis. As described in the FTA's Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment (FTA, 2006), locomotive - powered passenger trains traveling at 50 miles per hour (mph) can generate vibration levels up to approximately 84.5 VdB (0.067 in/sec PPV) at 50 feet from the track centerline. However, it should be noted that this vibration level represents the upper range of measurement data collected by FTA from well-maintained systems (FTA, 2006). Additionally, aside from periodic construction work that may occur throughout the City, the only other sources of groundborne vibration in the Specific Plan area and vicinity are heavy-duty vehicular travel (e.g., refuse trucks, delivery trucks, and transit buses) on local roadways. Trucks and buses traveling at a distance of 50 feet typically generate groundborne vibration velocity levels of around 63 VdB (approximately 0.006 in/sec PPV), and these levels could reach 72 VdB (approximately 0.016 in/sec PPV) where trucks pass over bumps in the road (FTA, 2006). In terms of PPV levels, a heavy-duty vehicle traveling at a distance of 50 feet can result in a vibration level of approximately 0.001 inch per second. Sensitive Receptors People in residences, motels and hotels, schools, libraries, churches, hospitals, nursing homes, auditoriums, natural areas, parks and outdoor recreation areas are generally more sensitive to noise than are people at commercial and industrial establishments. Consequently, the noise standards for sensitive land uses are more stringent than for those at less sensitive uses. The nearest sensitive receptors are the single- and multi -family residences surrounding the Specific Plan area, as well as some single- and multi -family residences that are located within the Specific Plan area boundaries along the segments of Bogart Avenue (north of Ramona Boulevard), Downing Avenue (south of Ramona Boulevard), and Pacific Avenue (south of Ramona Boulevard). As discussed previously, while there are no public schools in the Specific Plan area, the Central Elementary School and Baldwin Park High School are located approximately 0.25 mile to the southeast of the Specific Plan area, and the Vineland Elementary School is located- approximately -0.25 mile to the south. Furthermore, churches that are located adjacent to the Specific Plan boundaries include the First Christian Church, located at 4161 Baldwin Park Boulevard, and the Baldwin Park United Methodist Church, located at 3970 Maine Avenue. The proposed Specific Plan itself would also introduce sensitive receptors (e.g., residential uses) within the Specific Plan area. 3.8.2 Regulatory Setting Federal, state, and local agencies regulate different aspects of environmental noise. Federal and state agencies generally set noise standards for mobile sources such as aircraft and motor vehicles, while regulation of stationary sources is left to local agencies. Local regulation of noise involves implementation of general plan policies and noise ordinance standards. Local general .. ..... Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project ........ ..,.,..,_ 3.8-1 ...-,,......_—. ......... _....� ESA / D130053...3 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures ...... 3.8 Noise and Vibration plans identify general principles intended to guide and influence development plans; local noise ordinances establish standards and procedures for addressing specific noise sources and activities. Detailed below is a discussion of the relevant regulatory setting and noise regulations, plans, and policies. Federal Noise Standards There are no federal noise standards that directly regulate environmental noise related to the construction or operation of the proposed Specific Plan. With regard to noise exposure and workers, the Office of Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations safeguard the hearing of workers exposed to occupational noise. Federal regulations also establish noise limits for medium and heavy trucks (more than 4.5 tons, gross vehicle weight rating) under 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 205, Subpart B. The federal truck pass -by noise standard is 80 dBA at 15 meters from the vehicle pathway centerline. These controls are implemented through regulatory controls on truck manufacturers. Federal Transit Authority Vibration Standards The FTA has adopted vibration standards that are used to evaluate potential building damage impacts related to construction activities. The vibration damage criteria adopted by the FTA are shown in Table 3.8-4. TABLE 3.8-4 CONSTRUCTION VIBRATION DAMAGE CRITERIA Building Category PPV (in/sec) I. Reinforced -concrete, steel or timber (no plaster) 0.5 II. Engineered concrete and masonry (no plaster) 0.3 III. Non -engineered timber and masonry buildings 0.2 IV. Buildings extremely susceptible to vibration damage 0.12 SOURCE: Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, May 2006. In addition, the FTA has also adopted standards associated with human annoyance for groundborne vibration impacts for the following three land -use categories: Vibration Category 1 — High Sensitivity, Vibration Category 2 — Residential, and Vibration Category 3 — Institutional. The FTA defines Category 1 as buildings where vibration would interfere with operations within the building, including vibration -sensitive research and manufacturing facilities, hospitals with vibration -sensitive equipment, and university research operations. Vibration -sensitive equipment includes, but is not limited to, electron microscopes, high-resolution lithographic equipment, and normal optical microscopes. Category 2 refers to all residential land uses and any buildings where people sleep, such as hotels and hospitals. Category 3 refers to institutional land uses such as schools, churches, other institutions, and quiet offices that do not have vibration -sensitive equipment, but still have the potential for activity interference. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.8-12 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3, Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 3,8 Noise and Vibration Under conditions ✓here there are an infrequent number of events per day, the FTA has established thresholds of 65 VdB for Category 1 buildings, 80 Vd13 for Category 2 buildings, and 83 VdB for Category 3 buildings.I Under conditions where there are an occasional number of events per day, the FTA has established thresholds of 65 VdB for Category 1 buildings, 75 VdB for Category 2 buildings, and 78 Vd13 for Category 3 buildings.2 No thresholds have been adopted or recommended for commercial and office uses. California Department of Health Services Noise Standards The California Department of Health Services (DHS) has established guidelines for evaluating the compatibility of various land uses as a function of community noise exposure. These guidelines for land use and noise exposure compatibility are shown in Table 3.8-5. In addition, Section 65302(f) of the California Government Code requires each county and city in the state to prepare and adopt a comprehensive long-range general plan for its physical development, with Section 65302(g) requiring a noise element to be included in the general plan. The noise element must: (1) identify and appraise noise problems in the community; (2) recognize Office of Noise Control guidelines; and (3) analyze and quantify current and projected noise levels. The State of California also establishes noise limits for vehicles licensed to operate on public roads. For heavy trucks, the State pass -by standard is consistent with the federal limit of 80 dB. The state pass -by standard for light trucks and passenger cars (less than 4.5 tons, gross vehicle rating) is also 80 dBA at 15 meters from the centerline. These standards are implemented through controls on vehicle manufacturers and by legal sanction of vehicle operators by state and local law enforcement officials. The state has also established noise insulation standards for new multi -family residential units, hotels, and motels that would be subject to relatively high levels of transportation -related noise. These requirements are collectively known as the California Noise Insulation Standards (Title 24, California Code of Regulations). The noise insulation standards set forth an interior standard of 45 dBA (Ldn or CNEL) in any habitable room. They require an acoustical analysis demonstrating how dwelling units have been designed to meet this interior standard where such units are proposed in areas subject to noise levels greater than 60 dBA Ld„/CNEL. Title 24 standards are typically enforced by local jurisdictions through the building permit application process. State Vibration Standards There are no state vibratiori-standards applicable to -the proposed project. Moreover--, according to the California Department of Transportation's (Caltrans) Transportation- and Construction - Vibration Guidance Manual (2013), there are no official Caltrans standards for vibration. However, this manual provides guidelines for assessing vibration damage potential to various types of buildings, ranging from 0.08 to 0.12 in/sec PPV for extremely fragile historic buildings, ruins, and ancient monuments to 0.50 to 2.0 in/sec PPV for modern industrial/commercial buildings. I "Infrequent events" is defined by the Federal Transit Administration as being fewer than 30 vibration events of the same kind per day. 2 "Occasional events" is defined by the Federal Transit Administration as between 30 and 70 vibration events of the same source per day. Baldwin Perk TOD Specific Plan Project 3.8-13 ESA t D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures ___._ ........ 3.8 Noise and Vibration TABLE 3.8-5 COMMUNITY NOISE EXPOSURE (Ldn OR CNEL) a oLMg&y6ccggpt4bflm Specified land use is satisfactory, based upon the assumption that any buildings involved are of normal conventional construction without any special noise insulation requirements. b '(2p'ndgf&d 9ayr_ala g; New construction or development should be undertaken only after a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements is made and needed noise insulation features included in the design. Conventional construction, but with closed windows and fresh air supply systems or air conditioning will normally suffice. o ftorM'naBtiv Uraccgpgb New construction or development should generally be discouraged. If new construction or development does proceed, a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements must be made and needed noise insulation features included in the design. d Qeariy Unactxwtable: New construction or development should generally not be undertaken. SOURCE: Office of Planning and Research, 2003. Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan. The Noise Element in the Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan follows guidelines in the State Government Code Section 65302(g) and Section 46050.0 of the Health and Safety Code. It quantifies the community noise environment by establishing noise exposure contours for both near- and long-term levels of growth and noise -generating activity. This information guides development of goals and policies to achieve noise -compatible land uses, and identifies baseline noise levels and sources to help local noise ordinance enforcement. The three major noise issues in Baldwin Park are (1) noise and land use planning; (2) transportation noise; and (3) non -transportation noise (City of Baldwin Park, 2002). The following goals and policies address these issues. Goal 1.0: Incorporate noise considerations into land use planning decisions. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.8-14 ESA / Di 30953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 Normally Conditionally Normally Clearly Land Use Acceptablea Acceptableb Unacceptablec Unacceptabled Single-family, Duplex, Mobile Homes 50-60 55-70 70-75 above 75 Multi -Family Homes 50-65 60-70 70-75 above 75 Schools, Libraries, Churches, 50-70 60-70 70-80 above 80 Hospitals, Nursing Homes Transient Lodging — Motels, Hotels 50-65 60-70 70-80 above 75 Auditoriums, Concert Halls, --- 50-70 --•- above 70 Amphitheaters Sports Arena, - - 50-75 --- above 75 Outdoor Spectator Sports Playgrounds, Neighborhood Parks 50-70 --- 67-75 above 75 Golf Courses, Riding Stables, 50-75 •• 70 � 80 above 80 Water Recreation, Cemeteries Office Buildings, Business and 50-70 67-77 above 75 •-•- Professional Commercial Industrial, Manufacturing, Utilities, 50-75 70-80 above 75 --- Agriculture a oLMg&y6ccggpt4bflm Specified land use is satisfactory, based upon the assumption that any buildings involved are of normal conventional construction without any special noise insulation requirements. b '(2p'ndgf&d 9ayr_ala g; New construction or development should be undertaken only after a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements is made and needed noise insulation features included in the design. Conventional construction, but with closed windows and fresh air supply systems or air conditioning will normally suffice. o ftorM'naBtiv Uraccgpgb New construction or development should generally be discouraged. If new construction or development does proceed, a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements must be made and needed noise insulation features included in the design. d Qeariy Unactxwtable: New construction or development should generally not be undertaken. SOURCE: Office of Planning and Research, 2003. Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan. The Noise Element in the Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan follows guidelines in the State Government Code Section 65302(g) and Section 46050.0 of the Health and Safety Code. It quantifies the community noise environment by establishing noise exposure contours for both near- and long-term levels of growth and noise -generating activity. This information guides development of goals and policies to achieve noise -compatible land uses, and identifies baseline noise levels and sources to help local noise ordinance enforcement. The three major noise issues in Baldwin Park are (1) noise and land use planning; (2) transportation noise; and (3) non -transportation noise (City of Baldwin Park, 2002). The following goals and policies address these issues. Goal 1.0: Incorporate noise considerations into land use planning decisions. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.8-14 ESA / Di 30953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures .,,, .._...... 3,8 Noise and Vibration Policy 1.1: Use the noise/land use compatibility standards presented in Table NE -1 (shown as Table 3.8-6 below) as a guide for future planning and development decisions. Policy 1.2: Require noise -reduction techniques in site planning, architectural design, and construction where noise reduction is necessary. Provide noise control measures such as berms, walls, and sound attenuating construction in areas of new construction. Policy 1.3: Promote acceptable noise levels near schools, hospitals, convalescent homes, and other noise -sensitive areas. Policy 1.4: Establish targeted limits of noise for various land uses throughout the community. TABLE 3.8-6 NOISE/LAND USE COMPATIBILITY MATRIX _ ._...... _ . Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) Land Use Categories 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 Residential — Single family, Multi -family, duplex A A B B C Residential — Mobile homes A A B C C Transient Lodging — Motels, Hotels A A B B C C Schools, Libraries, Churches, Hospitals, Nursing Homes A A B C C Auditoriums, Concert Halls, Amphitheater, Meeting Halls B B C C Sport Arenas, Outdoor Spectator Sport, Amusement Parks A A A B B Playgrounds, Neighborhood Parks A A A B C Golf Courses, Riding Stables, Cemeteries A A A A B C C Office and Professional Buildings A A A B B C La Commercial Retail, Banks, Restaurants, Theaters A A A A B B C Industrial, Manufacturing, Utilities, Wholesale, Service Stations A A A A B B B Agriculture A AA A NOTES: Zone A Cteafly f;oampatible— Specified land use is satisfactory, based upon the assumption that any buildings involved are of normal convenk&oval construction without any special noise insulation requirements. Zone B Co,ndifftoanaliy Acomplable — New cttmstrucfion or development shouid be undertaken only after detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirement is made and needed noise insulation features in the design are determined. Conventional construction, with closed windows and fresh Mr supply systems or akrronditlorting, will normally suttaoe. Zone C Normally incompatible — New oonstiucfion or doveiop' went should generally be discouraged. If new construcfio6 or deveWpment doer, proceed, a detailed analysis of noise reduction requirements must be made and needed nolse insulation features included In the design. Shaded areas indicate new construction or development should generally not be undertaken. SOURCE: City of Baldwin Park General Plan, 2002. Goal 2.0: Minimize noise spillover from commercial and industrial uses into nearby residential neighborhoods. Policy 2.1 Enforce the 65 dB(A) state standard for exterior noise levels for all commercial uses. Baldwin Park TOD Specific ...... ..m ... ..,, ,m.m. ,.,� ........ .® ..,.,.,.. w �' Plan Project 3.8-15 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 3.8 Noise and Vibration Policy 2.2: Require that automobile and truck access to commercial properties located adjacent to residential parcels be located at the maximum practical distance from the residential parcel. Policy 2.3: Require that landscaped buffers be created between a commercial or mixed-use structure and an adjoining residential parcel. Goal 3.0: Minimize the noise impacts associated with the development of residential units above ground -floor commercial uses in mixed-use developments. Policy 3.1: Require that commercial uses developed as part of a mixed-use project with residential uses not be noise intensive. Policy 3.2: Require that mixed-use structures be designed to prevent transfer of noise and vibration from the commercial to the residential use. Policy 3.3: Orient mixed-use residential units away from major noise sources. Policy 3.4: Locate balconies and windows of residential units in mixed-use projects away from the primary street and other major noise sources. Goal 4.0: Reduce noise impacts from transportation sources. Policy 4.1: Require construction of acoustically effective and aesthetically pleasing barriers to shield noise -sensitive uses from excessive noise where necessary or feasible. Policy 4.2: Enforce city, state, and federal noise standards, especially those for mufflers and modified exhaust systems. Policy 4.3: Reduce transportation noise through proper design and coordination of routing. Policy 4.4: Reduce Metrolink train noise through coordination of scheduling with responsible rail authorities. Policy 4.5: Work cooperatively with Metrolink operators to identify areas of excessive train noise, and develop a mitigation program to achieve noise reduction. Goal 5.0: Develop measures to control excessive noise citywide. Policy 5.1: Adopt and implement a comprehensive City Noise Ordinance to regulate hours of operation and control excessive noise from landscape maintenance equipment, construction activity, and machinery. Policy 5.2: Minimize noise spillover from commercial and industrial uses into nearby residential neighborhoods. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.8-16 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures m. ._ --- m.. _ ......... ,.,.,... 3.8 Noise and Vibration Baldwin Park Municipal Code In addition to regulating noise through implementation of General Plan policies, local jurisdictions regulate noise through enforcement of local standards. These standards generally relate to noisy activities (e.g., use of loudspeakers and construction) and stationary noise sources and facilities (e.g., air conditioning units and industrial activities). Generally, federal and state laws preempt local agencies from establishing noise standards for transportation -related noise sources, such as aircraft, ships, trains, and motor vehicles. Chapter 130: General Offences Chapter 130 of the City of Baldwin Park Municipal Code contains a subchapter on noise control that serves to realize the City's policy to prohibit unnecessary, excessive, and annoying noises from all sources subject to its police power. With respect to construction activities, Section 130.04 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code limits any act of construction, reconstruction, or demolition of any building or structure, including, but not limited to, grading operations at any lot located in the City to between the hours of 7:00 am to 7:00 pm Section 130.37(E) of the City's Municipal Code further states that it is unlawful for any person within a residential zone, or within a radius of 500 feet therefrom, to operate equipment or perform any outside construction or repair work on buildings, structures, or projects or to operate any piledriver, power shovel, pneumatic hammer, derrick, power hoist, or any other construction type device (between the hours of 7:00 pm of one day and 7:00 am of the next day) in such a manner that a reasonable person of normal sensitiveness residing in the area is caused discomfort or annoyance unless a permit has been duly obtained beforehand from the Department of Public Works. Section 130.34 of the City's Municipal Code establishes the acceptable exterior ambient noise levels for different land use zones. Specifically, it is unlawful for any person within the City to make, cause, or allow to be produced, noise that would be received on property occupied by another person that would exceed the noise levels shown in Table 3.8-7 for the designated land use zones. TABLE 3.8-7 RECEIVING NOISE STANDARDS (dBA) Daytime Hours Nighttime Hours Zone' (7:00 AM to 7:00 PM)b (7:00 PM to 7.:00 AM )b R-1 55 45 RG and R-3 60- 56 Commercial 65 60 Industrial 70 70 R-1 = Single-family residential; RG = Garden multi -family residential; R-3 = Multi -family residential a At the boundary line between a residential property and a commercial and manufacturing property, the noise level of the quieter zone shall be used. b The numerical limits shall be adjusted by the following corrections, where appropriate: • For repefbtbve imptdBlva noise, pure tones, sourid with cyclically varying amplitude, a steady whine screech or hum, the numerical bli^nbts given in the table above shall be reduced by 5 dBA. • For noise occurring more than five but less than 15 minutes per hour, the numerical limits given in the table above shall be reduced by 2 dBA. • For noise occurring more than one but less than five minutes per hour, the numerical limits given in the table above shall be increased by 5 dBA. • For noise occurring less than one minute per hour, the numerical limits given in the table above shall be increased by 7 dBA. SOURCE: Citv of Baldwin Park Municipal Code, Section 130.34, Baldwin Park TOO Specific Plan Project 3.8-17 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3, Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 3,8 Noise and Vibration Additionally, Section 130.35 of the City's Municipal Code of also includes provisions to regulate noise levels that disturb public peace. Section 130.35 states that it is unlawful for any person to willfully make or continue, or cause to be made or continued, any loud, unnecessary, and unusual noise which disturbs the peace or quiet of any neighborhood, or which causes discomfort or annoyance to residents of the area. Standards that may be considered in determining whether a noise violation exists could include, but are not limited to, the following: A. The level of noise; B. Whether the nature of the noise is usual or unusual; C. The nature and zoning of the area within which the noise emanates; D. The density of the inhabitation of the area within which the noise emanates; E. The time of the day or night the noise occurs; F. The duration of the noise; G. Whether the noise is recurrent, intermittent, or constant; and H. Whether the origin of the noise is natural or unnatural. Section 130.370 of the City's Municipal Code provides the following list of noise sources that are exempted from the City's noise standards: 1. Lawfully conducted parades; 2. Emergency work (which is defined as work that is necessary to restore property to a safe condition following a public calamity, or work required to protect persons or property from an imminent exposure to danger, or work by private or public utilities when restoring utility service); 3. Aircraft flight operations; 4. Bells, chimes or carillons while being used in conjunction with religious services; 5. Commercial motor vehicle operations; 6. Emergency energy release devices; 7. Speed or endurance events authorized by the city, involving motor or other vehicles; Surface carriers engaged in commerce by railroad, except for horns and whistles operated within city limits; Systems used to warn community of attack or imminent public danger such as flooding or explosion; 10. Any noise or situation within the scope of Sections 23130 or 23109 of the Vehicle Code of the state. Chapter 153: Zoning Code Chapter 153 of the City of Baldwin Park Municipal Code represents the City's Zoning Code. The Zoning Code is established to regulate the use of land within the City in an orderly manner Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.8-18 ESA I D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 3.8 Noise and Vibration consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Baldwin Park General Plan and to protect the public health, safety, comfort, welfare and general prosperity of the City and its residents through classifying, designating, regulating and restricting the use of land, buildings and structures. Specifically, Section 153.010.060 of the Zoning Code states that when a project is determined to be subject to the provisions of CEQA, the application must be reviewed in accordance with the provisions of this chapter along with the CEQA Guidelines and any environmental guidelines adopted by the City. Section 153.140 of the City Zoning Code establishes performance standards to minimize public hazards, prevent the creation of nuisances and other conditions that are potentially harmful or discomforting, protect and improve the environment and the appearance of the community, and deter blighting. The performance standards apply to all new construction, renovation and alteration of existing uses or structures in all zone districts. With respect to noise, Section 153.140.070 of the City Zoning Code establishes both exterior and interior noise standards for land use zones to prohibit unnecessary, excessive, and annoying noises from all sources. The established exterior noise standards are shown in Table 3.8-8.3 TABLE 3.8-8 EXTERIOR NOISE STANDARDS Zone Time Allowable Noise Level (dBA)' Residential 7:00 A.M. — 7:00 P.M. (Day) 55 Residential 7:00 P.M. — 10:00 P.M. (Evening) 50 Residential 10:00 P.M. — 7:00 A.M. (Night) 45 Commercial 7:00 A.M. — 10 P.M. (Day and evening) 65 Commercial 7:00 P.M. — 7 A.M. (Night) 55 Industrial __ , V 65 An Ime....,, � a Increases In the allowable exterior noise levels listed in this table play be permitted in accordance with the standards outlined below: • An Increase of a dBA from the exterior noise leveks is permitted over a 15 cumulative minute duration per 24-hour period, • An increase of 10 dBA from the exterior noise levels is permitted over a five cumulative minute duration per 24-hour period. • An increase of 15 dBA from the exterior noise levels is permitted over a one cumulative minute duration per 24-hour period. • An increase of 20 dBA from the exterior noise levels is permitted for less than one cumulative minute duration per 24-hour period. SOURCE: City of Baldwin Park Municipal Code, Section 153.140.070. With respect to interior noise standards, Section 153.140.070(D) of the City Zoning Code states that no person shall create or allow the creation of noise that causes the interior noise level when measured within any dwelling unit to exceed 45 dBA at any time. However, an increase of 5 dBA and 10 dBA from the allowable 45 dBA interior noise level may be permitted for a one minute and less than one minute duration (cumulative minutes per 24-hour period), respectively. Furthermore, Section 153.140.070(E) requires that use of compressors or other equipment, including, but not limited to, vents, ducts and conduits (but excluding window or wall -mounted 3 As the City Zoning Code spocilicap-ly states that proalects subJect to the provisions of CEQA ntaust be reviewed in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 153, and given thart the exterioe noise standards rtNconi »'tended in this ch apicr was passed by the. City in May 2012as arpposcd to the n:atse stnndards from Chalptcr 130 of 11c City's municipal Code that were Passed by the c1ty in May l^. 96, the exterior noise standards shown in'I'alale 3.8-8 would be applied gar lhe; proposed paraljecl'noise impact analysis. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.8-19 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures ---------- m . 3.8 Noise and Vibration air conditioners) that are located outside of the exterior walls of any building to be enclosed within a permanent, noncombustible, view -obscuring enclosure to ensure that the equipment would not emit noise in excess of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) standards. Finally, with respect to minimizing the disturbance and inconvenience from vibrations on certain activities and individuals, Section 153.140.090 of the City Zoning Code prohibits any person or use from creating, maintaining, or causing ground vibration that is discernable without the aid of instruments to a person of normal sensitivity at any point on a property that is adjacent to the property of the vibration source. However, the ground vibration caused by moving vehicles, trains, aircraft or temporary construction or demolition is exempted. 3.8.3 Thresholds of Significance In accordance with Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, the project could have a significant impact on noise and/or ground -borne vibration if it would result in: • Exposure of persons to, or generation of, noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies; • Exposure of persons to, or generation of, excessive ground -borne vibration or ground - borne noise levels; • A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project; • A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project; • Exposure of people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels (for a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport); or • Exposure of people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels (for a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip). It was determined in the Initial Study (Appendix A) that the proposed Specific Plan would not result in any impacts associated with the exposure of people residing or working in the Specific Plan area to excessive noise levels associated with a public use airport or private airstrip. The Specific Plan area is not located within any airport land use plan nor is it located near any private airstrips. The nearest airport to the Specific Plan area is the El Monte Airport located approximately four miles away to the west. Given this distance, no impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed Specific Plan and no further analysis is provided in this EIR. Noise Criteria For the purpose of determining whether the proposed Specific Plan would result in the exposure of persons to or generate noise levels that would exceed established noise standards, construction and stationary operational noise levels associated with the Project would result in a significant impact if the City's construction noise regulations are violated and the City's operational noise standards are exceeded. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.8-20 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures �...,... ......... 3,8 Noise and Vibration The CEQA Guidelines does not define the levels at which permanent and temporary increases in ambient noise are considered "substantial." Therefore, with regards to traffic noise, the significance of the proposed Specific Plan's noise impacts can be determined by comparing estimated project -related noise levels to existing no -project noise levels. With respect to the community noise environment, the average healthy ear can barely perceive a noise level change of 3 dBA. A change from 3 to 5 dBA may be noticed by some individuals who are sensitive to changes in noise. A 5 dBA increase is readily noticeable, while the human ear perceives a 10 dBA increase as a doubling of sound. As such, for the purpose of the proposed Specific Plan's traffic noise analysis, it is assumed that a significant impact would occur if the proposed Specific Plan increases ambient noise levels along roadways within and surrounding the Specific Plan area above existing ambient noise levels by greater than 5 dBA and if the resultant noise level is inconsistent with the standards in the City's General Plan land use/noise compatibility matrix (shown in Table 3.8-6). Vibration Criteria The CEQA Guidelines also do not define the levels at which groundborne vibration or groundborne noises are considered "excessive." Additionally, as discussed previously, the City has not adopted any quantitative thresholds for groundbome vibration impacts. Thus, in terms of construction -related vibration impacts on buildings, the adopted guidelines/recommendations by the FTA to limit groundborne vibration based on the age and/or condition of the structures that are located in proximity to construction activity are used in this analysis to evaluate potential groundborne vibration impacts. Based on the FTA criteria, construction impacts relative to groundborne vibration would be considered significant if any of the following were to occur: • Project construction activities would cause a PPV groundborne vibration level to exceed 0.5 in/see at a reinforced concrete, steel, or timber building; • Project construction activities would cause a PPV groundborne vibration level to exceed 0.3 in/sec at any engineered concrete and masonry building; • Project construction activities would cause a PPV groundborne vibration level to exceed 0.2 in/sec at any non -engineered timber and masonry buildings; or • Project construction activities would cause a PPV ground -borne vibration level to exceed 0.12 in/sec at any buildings "extremely susceptible to vibration damage" (i.e., a historical building). In terms of groundborne vibration impacts associated with human annoyance, this analysis uses the FTA's vibration impact thresholds for sensitive buildings, residences, and institutional land uses under conditions where there are an infrequent number of events per day. These thresholds are 65 VdB at buildings where vibration would interfere with interior operations, 80 VdB at residences and buildings where people normally sleep, and 83 VdB at other institutional buildings (FTA, 2006). The 65 VdB threshold applies to typical land uses where vibration would interfere with interior operations, including vibration -sensitive research and manufacturing facilities, hospitals with vibration -sensitive equipment, and university research operations. Vibration - sensitive equipment includes, but are not limited to, electron microscopes, high-resolution lithographic equipment, and normal optical microscopes. The 80 VdB threshold applies to all Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.8-21 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 3.8 Noise and Vibm „ ration residential land uses and any buildings where people sleep, such as hotels and hospitals. The 83 Vd13 threshold applies to institutional land uses such as schools, churches, other institutions, and quiet offices that do not have vibration -sensitive equipment, but still have the potential for activity interference. 3.8.4 Methodology Implementation of the proposed Specific Plan could result in the introduction of noise levels that may exceed permitted City noise levels. The primary sources of noise associated with the proposed Specific Plan would be construction activities within the Specific Plan area and project - related traffic volumes generated by the new residential and non-residential land uses. Secondary sources of noise would include new stationary sources (such as heating, ventilation, and air conditioning units) associated with the new land use developments. The increase in noise levels generated by these activities and other sources associated with the proposed Specific Plan have been quantitatively estimated and compared to the applicable noise standards and thresholds of significance. Aside from noise levels, groundborne vibration would also be generated during the construction of the new developments occurring throughout the Specific Plan area by various construction - related activities and equipment. Thus, the groundborne vibration levels generated by these sources have also been quantitatively estimated and compared to applicable thresholds of significance. Construction Noise Levels Construction noise levels were estimated by data published by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) for general outdoor construction activities. These noise levels are then analyzed against the construction noise standards established in the City's municipal code to determine whether an exceedance of allowable noise levels would occur across any adjacent property boundaries. Roadway Noise Levels Roadway noise levels have been calculated for selected study area intersection segments located within and in proximity to the Specific Plan area based on information provided in the traffic report for the proposed Specific Plan. The roadway segments selected for analysis are expected to be most directly impacted by project -related traffic, which, for the purpose of this analysis, includes the roadways located within and immediately adjacent to the Specific Plan area. These roadways, when compared to roadways located further away from the Specific Plan area, would experience the greatest percentage increase in traffic generated by the Specific Plan. The noise levels were calculated using the FHWA-RD-77-108 model and traffic volumes from the traffic analysis. Groundborne Vibration Associated with Project Construction and Operation Groundborne vibration levels resulting from construction activities occurring within the Specific Plan area were estimated by data published by the FTA in its Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment document. Potential vibration levels resulting from construction of new transit - Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.8-22 ESA I D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3.8 Noise and Vibration oriented developments under the proposed Specific Plan are identified for off-site locations that are sensitive to vibration based on their distance from construction activities. As discussed previously, Section 153.140.090 of the City Zoning Code prohibits the generation of vibration levels that would be discernable without the aid of instruments to a person of normal sensitivity at any point on a property that is adjacent to the property of the vibration source. However, the City has not adopted any quantitative thresholds for construction or operational groundbome vibration impacts. As such, the potential vibration levels at off-site sensitive locations resulting from implementation of the proposed Specific Plan are analyzed against the vibration thresholds established by the FTA to determine whether an exceedance of allowable vibration levels would occur. 3.8.5 Impact Analysis Impact 3.8-1: Implementation of the project could expose persons to, or generate, noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies. Construction The proposed Specific Plan identifies sites that have the potential for redevelopment, infill development, and/or adaptive reuse of existing under-utilized structures to better serve the City's Downtown area. The Specific Plan proposes to rezone and amend General Plan land uses of specific parcels within the project area with the intent of introducing a transit -oriented development pattern to the area. Buildout under the proposed Specific Plan would involve development of 289,150 square feet of non-residential development and an additional 848 multi -family dwelling units. A total of 68,200 square feet of commercial and industrial uses could be removed in the Specific Plan area (including almost 24,000 square feet of manufacturing uses) as well as 17 single- family residential units. Specific timing and sequencing of individual development projects within the Specific Plan area have not been determined at this time. It is anticipated that these developments would be market driven such that they would occur in response to the existing and future needs of the City's residential, commercial, and light industrial markets over the build out period. As such, it is expected that the proposed Specific Plan's construction activities would occur intermittently throughout the course of the 20 -year planning period. Construction noise impacts associated with each new individual development would be short-term in nature and limited to the period of time when construction activity is taking place for that particular development. Development of future residential, commercial, and light industrial land uses would generally involve construction phases such as demolition, grading/excavation, building construction, and asphalt paving. Construction, although typically short-term, can be a significant source of noise. Construction is most significant when it takes place near sensitive land uses, occurs at night, or in early morning hours. The construction activity noise levels at and near development projects within the Specific Plan area would fluctuate depending on the particular type, number, and duration of uses of various pieces of construction equipment. Generally, each new residential, commercial, light industrial, or mixed-use development would require the use of heavy construction equipment for activities such as site demolition, grading and excavation, installation of utilities, paving, and building fabrication. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.8-23 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3, Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures .. ......................................................._.........................._...__....................................................................._..............................._._._._._. ......... 3.8 Noise and Vibration Development activities would also involve the use of smaller power tools, generators, and other sources of noise. During each stage of construction for each individual development, there would be a different mix of equipment operating and noise levels would vary based on the amount of equipment in operation and the location of the activity. The USEPA has compiled data for outdoor noise levels for typical construction activities that are presented in Table 3.8-9, and represent composite noise levels associated with typical construction activities, which take into account both the number of pieces and spacing of heavy construction equipment that are typically used during each phase of construction. These noise levels would diminish rapidly with distance from the construction site at a rate of approximately 6 dBA per doubling of distance. For example, a noise level of 84 dBA Leq measured at 50 feet from the noise source to the receptor would reduce to 78 dBA Leq at 100 feet from the source to the receptor, and reduce by another 6 dBA Leq to 72 dBA Leq at 200 feet from the source to the receptor. Table 3.8- 10 shows typical noise levels produced by various types of construction equipment. TABLE 3.8-9 TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION NOISE LEVELS Construction Phase Noise Level (dBA, Lgq)a Ground Clearing 84 Excavation 89 Foundations 78 Erection 85 Finishing 89 a Average noise levels correspond to a distance of 50 feet from the noisiest piece of equipment associated with a given phase of construction and 200 feet from the rest of the equipment associated with that phase. Source: USEPA, Noise from Construction Equipment and Operations, Building Equipment, and Home Appliances, 1971. The construction activities for each new development that would occur under the proposed Specific Plan would expose the nearby existing uses to increased noise levels. Because the Specific Plan area is a higher density developed urban area and the Specific Plan proposes mixed- use land uses that would be implemented through market demands over a 20 -year planning period, construction of new developments could be located less than 50 feet from a sensitive receptor, such as existing residential units. Consequently, construction that occurs immediately adjacent to these existing offsite receptors would generate noise levels that would be substantially greater than the existing noise levels at these receptor locations. Based on the noise levels for general outdoor construction activities shown in Table 3.8-9, noise levels at adjacent off-site receptors that are located within 50 feet of a future residential, commercial, or mixed-use development occurring by the proposed Specific Plan could reach up to 89 dBA Leq or above. It should be noted that this noise level is not anticipated to occur throughout the entire course of a construction day, as construction equipment and activities rarely operate continuously for a full day at a construction site. Typically, the operating cycle for construction equipment would Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.8-24 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures ......... ®,., .. _. 3.8 Noise and Vibration involve one or two minutes of full power operation followed by three or four minutes at lower power settings. Additionally, construction equipment engines would likely be intermittently turned on and off over the course of a construction day. TABLE 3.8-10 TYPICAL NOISE LEVELS FROM CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT Construction Equipment Air Compressor Backhoe Compactor Concrete Mixer Concrete Pump Crane (Mobile) Dozer Grader Jack Hammer Loader Paver Pile —Driver (Impact) Pile -Driver (Sonic) Scraper Truck Source: FTA, 2006. Noise Level (dBA, Leq at 50 feet) 81 80 82 85 82 83 85 85 88 85 89 101 96 89 88 With respect to construction activities, neither the City's General Plan Noise Element nor Municipal Code has established a numerical standard to regulate construction noise. Instead, construction noise levels in the City are regulated based on permitted hours of operation. Section 130.04 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code limits construction activities at any lot located in the City to between the hours of 7:00 am to 7:00 pm. Additionally, Section 130.37(E) of the City's Municipal Code states that it is unlawful for any person within a residential zone, or within a radius of 500 feet therefrom, to operate equipment or perform any outside construction or repair work or to operate any construction equipment between the hours of 7:00 pm of one day and 7:00 am of the next day in such a manner that a reasonable person of normal sensitiveness residing in the area is caused discomfort or annoyance unless a permit has been duly obtained beforehand from the Department of Public Works. As such, all new development projects in the Specific Plan area would be subject to these regulations. With compliance with the regulations established in Sections 130.04 and 130.37(E) of the City's Municipal Code, the construction activities associated with future developments in the Specific Plan area would not exceed any standards established in the City's General Plan or noise ordinance. Thus, impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation required Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.8-25 ESA I D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures ........ ......... 3.8 Noise and Vibration Significance Determination: Less than significant Operations City Exterior Noise Standards With respect to operational noise levels, the City has established exterior noise standards that are correlated with land use zoning classifications, which are shown in Table 3.8-8. The standards aim to prohibit unnecessary, excessive, and annoying noises from all sources, as certain noise levels are detrimental to the health and welfare of individuals. The Specific Plan would implement new land uses that would include residential, commercial, civic, open space, and mixed-use developments. These new developments may introduce higher noise levels than currently exist adjacent to existing sensitive uses, such as residences. However, the noise environment in a high density, urban, walkable transit -oriented environment is anticipated to be louder than other areas in the City that are more secluded. Because of this Section 153.070.040(E) of the City Zoning Code specifically requires residents of new mixed-use development projects in the Mixed Use Zones (MU -1 or MU -2), whether owners or tenants, to be notified in writing prior to taking up residence that they would be living in an urban -type environment and that the noise levels in such an environment may be higher than a strictly residential area. Through implementation of development specific environmental review and development permit process, the City would consider all future developments in the Specific Plan area on a case-by- case basis to ascertain whether the operational noise levels generated by an individual development could result in exceedance of the City's noise standards, which regulate the appropriate location for various types of uses in relation to noise generation. Development permits are provided pursuant to the applicant's compliance with City Municipal Codes related to noise, which are provided to reduce potential noise impacts. With implementation of existing City regulations, noise impacts on existing land uses in the Specific Plan area from operation of future developments would be less than significant. Mitigation Measure: No mitigation required Significance Determination: Less than Significant Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning Equipment Noise Once the new development projects associated with the proposed Specific Plan are operational, a constant source of noise may be generated from these developments from operation of heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems. However, as an industry practice, the design of the onsite HVAC units and other noise -generating mechanical equipment associated with the new developments in the Specific Plan area would typically be installed on the rooftops of residential, commercial, and mixed-use buildings and located either within an enclosure or behind other intervening structures that would provide a level of noise shielding for nearby noise - sensitive uses. Specifically, Section 153.140.070(E) of the City Zoning Code requires compressors or other equipment including, but not limited to, vents, ducts, and conduits that are Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.8-26 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures ® ..,__ ... ..... 3 8 N. , oise and Vibration located outside of the exterior walls of any building to be enclosed with a permanent, noncombustible, view -obscuring enclosure to reduce noise levels. When these design measures are taken into consideration with the existing urban noise environment of the Specific Plan area, the noise generated from HVAC systems and other mechanical equipment at the new development sites would not increase ambient noise levels by 5 dBA of greater. As a result, noise impacts on the existing and future residential uses in the Specific Plan area from HVAC or other mechanical equipment would be less than significant. Mitigation Measure: No mitigation required Significance Determination: Less than Significant Loading Dock Noise As the proposed Specific Plan would place a mix of residential, commercial, and mixed uses in the Specific Plan area, noise generated by activities at the commercial uses could affect both nearby existing and new noise -sensitive receptors. Operational noise from the new commercial uses associated with the proposed Specific Plan would be primarily related to the arrival, departure, and loading/unloading of goods from delivery trucks and their on-site circulation. While the noise levels generated by loading docks are not ordinarily loud, they may create temporary, sporadic increases in ambient noise. Noise associated with commercial motor vehicle operations are exempted from the City's noise standards, according to Section 130.37(J)(5) of the City's Municipal Code. Because this noise is exempt, it would not be in excess of standards, and impacts related to commercial loading and unloading activities would be less than significant. Mitigation Measure: No mitigation required Significance Determination: Less than Significant Transportation Related Noise Based on the City's noise/land use compatibility matrix shown in Table 3.8-6, the City allows new single- and multi -family residential uses to be constructed where the average noise environment in outdoor activity areas is up to 70 dBA CNEL, new commercial retail uses to be constructed in areas where the average outdoor noise level is up to 80 dBA CNEL, and new industrial uses to be constructed in areas where the average outdoor noise level is up to 85 dBA CNEL. The 70 dBA CNEL, 80 dBA CNEL, and 85 dBA CNEL noise levels for residential, commercial retail, and industrial uses, respectively, are allowed provided that the buildings are constructed using conventional design and that fresh air supply systems or air conditioning are provided to allow windows to be kept closed. From a community noise perspective, the 24-hour average noise levels within and surrounding the Specific Plan area are influenced primarily by traffic on local roadways. Additionally, the Metrolink passenger trains and UPRR freight trains that run through the Baldwin Park Metrolink Station on a daily basis are also a noise source in the Specific Plan area. As discussed previously, passing trains on the Metrolink line can generate noise levels up to 88.5 dBA at 100 feet, while passing train horn noise levels can reach as high as 99.2 dBA at 100 feet. With respect to traffic Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.8-27 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 3,8 Noise and Vibration noise levels, the existing noise levels on roadway segments located within and in the vicinity of the Specific Plan area, as shown in Table 3.8-2, range from 41.3 dBA CNEL (segment of Big Dalton Avenue east of Pacific Avenue) to 69.6 dBA CNEL (segment of Ramona Boulevard west of Baldwin Park Boulevard) at 50 feet from the centerline of the roadway segments. This roadway modeling provides a representative indication of the current noise levels within the Specific Plan area. To evaluate the future traffic noise environment in the Specific Plan area, the future traffic noise levels on the roadways located within and immediately adjacent to the area were estimated based on future traffic volumes provided in the project's traffic study. The calculation of future traffic noise levels was done using the FHWA-RD-77-108, which calculates the CNEL noise level based on site-specific traffic volumes, distances, speeds and/or noise barriers. The future roadway noise levels are shown in Table 3.8-11. TABLE 3.8-11 FUTURE (2035) WITH PROJECT ROADWAY NOISE LEVELS Roadway Roadway Segment dBA CNELa West of Merced Avenue 70.2 East of Merced Avenue 70.1 West of Stewart Avenue 70.0 East of Stewart Avenue 69.9 West of Baldwin Park Boulevard 70.4 East of Baldwin Park Boulevard 70.0 West of Cesaer Chavez Drive 69.9 East of Cesaer Chavez Drive 70.7 Ramona Boulevard West of Maine Avenue 70.6 East of Maine Avenue 69.5 West of Bogart Avenue 68.9 East of Bogart Avenue 69.3 West of Downing Avenue 69.2 East of Downing Avenue 69.3 West of Badillo Street 69.3 E. ......... .........................................._........__................................................................................-- West of Puente Avenue ----................. _ 69.8 Badillo Street East of Puente Avenue 69.2 West of Maine Avenue ....... - - ........ 68.5 Los Angeles Street East of Maine Avenue .....,.,.....� ... ,.. .. ..... 67.5 -.. ... West of Maine Avenue ----- --- 60.2 Clark Street East of Maine Avenue _..._....... ..... ., ... 59.3 Palmrose Street East of Maine Avenue .. ... - ........ 53.1 Bogart Avenue ,,.... _.,........... East of Pacific Avenue ..,........ ..... ................. 58.2 .. West of Pacific Avenue __.,. -.., ......... 49.6 Downing Avenue East of Pacific Avenue 57.9 West of Pacific Avenue 57.4 Big Dalton Avenue East of Pacific Avenue 41.3 Merced WesAvenue 69.6 Baldwin Park Boulevard EasttoffMe Avenue nue _._._ _ 69 8 North of Ramona Boulevard ........ _.......... ...... _...... 64.7 Merced Avenue South of Ramona Boulevard 64.8 North of Baldwin Park Boulevard 65.3 _._. _ .... Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project ......... ......... 3.8-28 ............ ..... _._. ....------- - .............. ..- ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures ..a.�... ......... ®,.. 3,8 Noise and V„ .......... ibration Roadway Roadway Segment dBA CNELa South of Baldwin Park Boulevard 66.6 ...._ ..... �� ....... North of RBoulevard 59.3 Stewart Avenue South of Ramona Boulevard ®, 58.0 ..._. _._�_ ��h of Ramona Boulevard ........ North 68.8 Baldwin Park Boulevard South of Ramona Boulevard 69.4 Cesaer Chavez Drive North of Ramona Boulevard -.... 56.0 ®1111 .-..., North of Los Angeles Street 67.4 South of Los Angeles Street 64.8 North of Clark Street 64.7 South of Clark Street 64.7 Maine Avenue North of Palmrose Street 65.0 South of Palmrose Street 64.9 North of Ramona Boulevard 65.4 South of Ramona Boulevard -_ 65.6 North of Bogart Avenue 70.2 South of Bogart Avenue 70.2 North of Downing Avenue 70.2 Pacific Avenue South of Downing Avenue 70.2 North of Big Dalton Avenue 70.1 South of Big Dalton Avenue ........ .1111........... ., 70 0 North of Ramona Boulevard 58.4 Bogart Avenue South of Ramona Boulevard 54.7 ,.w -_ "" North of Ramona Boulevard b 4 2 Downing Avenue South of Ramona Boulevard . 55.8 - Lozano Drive. South of Ramo ®.....__.... Ramona Boulevard - .....� __....__ 48.1 � ...._ 48.1 .. �... v... ®11.11 _....... .,.... North of Badillo Street 58.5 Puente Avenue South of Badillo Street 62.0 a Values represent noise levels at 50 feet from the centerline of each roadway. TRAFFIC INFORMATION SOURCE: The Mobility Ground, 2014. TABLE SOURCE: ESA, 2015. Calculation data and results provided in Appendix D„ As shown in Table 3.8-11, future traffic noise levels at project buildout would range from 41.3 dBA CNEL (segment of Big Dalton Avenue east of Pacific Avenue) to 70.7 dBA CNEL (segment of Ramona Boulevard east of Cesaer Chavez Drive) at 50 feet from the centerline of the roadways. Overall, none of the traffic noise levels shown would exceed the 80 dBA CNEL and 85 dBA CNEL noise levels that would allow for commercial retail and industrial land uses to be constructed. With respect to new residential uses, all of the mixed use zones located adjacent to Ramona Boulevard recommended under the proposed Specific Plan are located beyond 50 feet from Ramona Boulevard. As such, the traffic noise levels at these mixed use zones along Ramona Boulevard under future (2035) conditions are anticipated to be below the 70 dBA CNEL noise level that would allow for residential uses to be constructed. Additionally, the future traffic noise levels along other street segments located adjacent to lands zoned for mixed use development under the Specific Plan (e.g., Maine Avenue, Bogart Avenue, Downing Avenue, etc.) would also not exceed 70 dBA CNEL. As such, the future traffic noise levels in the Specific Plan area would meet the City's noise/land use compatibility standards. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.8-29 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 3.8 Noise and Vibration However, because mixed use developments involving residential uses are proposed adjacent to, and in the immediate vicinity of, the Metrolink line, the noise generated by trains traveling through the Specific Plan area daily (along with the sounding of horns as the trains approach the Baldwin Park Metrolink Station) would result in a noise environment that is generally not compatible with residential land uses. As shown in Table 3.8-1, the two long-term (24-hour) noise measurements taken within the Specific Plan area near the Metrolink line and at locations zoned for mixed use development under the Specific Plan showed that noise levels currently reach as high as approximately 75 dBA CNEL (refer to Figure 3.8-2 for the location of the long- term measurement sites). As indicated in Table 3.8-6, noise levels up to 75 dBA CNEL are considered by the General Plan to normally be incompatible for residential developments. Furthermore, because the proposed Specific Plan also has commercial and industrial uses zoned in parcels located directly adjacent to the Metrolink line (i.e., commercial zone parcel located at the intersection of Ramona Boulevard and Bogart Avenue; industrial zone parcel located at intersection of Downing Avenue and Alderson Avenue), it is anticipated that the noise environments in these areas may also exceed the 80 dBA CNEL and 85 dBA CNEL noise levels that are deemed to be compatible for residential uses, respectively. Thus, because future residential, commercial, and industrial uses could be located in areas where the noise environment exceeds 70 dBA CNEL, 80 dBA CNEL, and 85 dBA CNEL, respectively, impacts associated with noise/land use compatibility would be potentially significant. Implementation of Mitigation Measure N0I-5 would require all future developments that include residential uses that are located within 500 feet of the Metrolink line ensure that individual development projects would implement appropriate land use planning for exterior private areas, and implement noise reduction measures, such as sound walls, double pane windows, and insulation features included in the design to meet the City's the interior noise standards of 45 dBA CNEL. With implementation of Mitigation Measure N0I-5, development projects that would occur by the proposed Specific Plan would not conflict with the City's noise regulations, and impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measure: Mitigation Measure N0I-1: City shall ensure that each development project that includes residential uses within 500 feet of the Metrolink line meets the City's the interior noise standards of 45 dBA CNEL and exterior standards per zoning designation, as provided by the City of Baldwin Park Municipal Code, Section 153.140.070. Upon receipt of a development application that includes residential uses within 500 feet of the Metrolink line, the City Planning Division shall conduct a review of noise generation in the proposed development area and project features to be included to reduce noise levels to meet the City's Municipal Code requirements. Measures that can be taken may include, but are not limited to, the erection of noise walls, glass noise barriers, double pane windows, insulated doors, roofing, and siding, and landscaping. Significance after Mitigation: Less than significant Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.8-30 ESA t D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures .... ................... ........ m , .,.,- _...... 3.8 Noise and Vibration Impact 3.8-2: Implementation of the project could expose persons to, or generate, excessive ground -borne vibration or ground -borne noise levels. Construction Construction activities for individual development projects that would occur by the Specific Plan area would include demolition and grading activities, which would have the potential to generate low levels of groundborne vibration. Persons residing and working in close proximity to a construction site could be exposed to the generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels related to construction activities. The results from vibration can range from no perceptible effects at the lowest vibration levels, to low rumbling sounds and perceptible vibrations at moderate levels, to slight structural damage at the highest levels. Site ground vibrations from construction activities very rarely reach the levels that can damage structures, but they can be perceived in the audible range and be felt in buildings very close to a construction site. The various PPV and RMS velocity (in VdB) levels for the types of construction equipment that would operate during the construction of the individual development projects are identified in Table 3.8-12. As shown, vibration velocities could reach as high as approximately 0.089 inch - per -second PPV at 25 feet for typical construction activities, which corresponds to a RMS velocity level (in VdB) of 87 VdB at 25 feet. When high impact activities such as pile driving are required, vibration velocities could reach as high as 0.644 inch -per -second PPV at 25 feet, which corresponds to a RMS velocity level of 104 VdB at 25 feet. TABLE 3.8-12 VIBRATION SOURCE LEVELS FOR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT Approximate PPV (in/sec) Approximate RMS (VdB) SOURCE: FTA, 2006; ESA, 2015„ Over the course of the Specific Plan build out, construction activities associated with new development could occur adjacent to or in the vicinity of sensitive receptors since these developments would primarily require redevelopment of already developed properties in the Specific Plan area, which includes mixed uses. As the Specific Plan area is currently built with existing land uses, it is anticipated that some existing adjacent uses could be located less than 50 Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.8-31 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 25 50 60 75 100 25 50 60 75 100 Equipment Feet Feet Feet Feet Feet Feet Feet Feet Feet Feet Pile Driver (Impact) 0.644 0.228 0.173 0.124 0.081 104 95 93 90 86 Pile Driver (Sonic) 0.170 0.060 0.046 0.033 0.021 93 84 82 79 75 Large Bulldozer 0.089 0.031 0.024 0.017 0.011 87 78 76 73 69 Caisson Drilling 0.089 0.031 0.024 0.017 0.011 87 78 76 73 69 Loaded Trucks 0.076 0.027 0.020 0.015 0.010 86 77 75 72 68 Jackhammer 0.035 0.012 0.009 0.007 0.004 79 70 68 65 61 Small Bulldozer 0.003 0.001 0.0008 0.0006 0.0004 58 49 47 44 40 SOURCE: FTA, 2006; ESA, 2015„ Over the course of the Specific Plan build out, construction activities associated with new development could occur adjacent to or in the vicinity of sensitive receptors since these developments would primarily require redevelopment of already developed properties in the Specific Plan area, which includes mixed uses. As the Specific Plan area is currently built with existing land uses, it is anticipated that some existing adjacent uses could be located less than 50 Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.8-31 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting. Impacts. and Mitigation Measures --- 3.8 Noise and Vibration feet or less from a construction site. Consequently, receptors that are located immediately adjacent to a construction site could be exposed to excessive groundborne vibration levels. Based on the vibration source levels shown in Table 3.8-12, adjacent receptors that are located less than 50 feet from a construction site could be exposed to peak vibration levels of above 0.031 PPV and 78 VdB during construction. Under scenarios where a construction site associated with the proposed project is located within 25 feet from an existing adjacent land use, the peak vibration levels experienced by these adjacent land uses can be above 0.089 PPV and 87 VdB during typical construction activities. While most of the new development in the Specific Plan area is not anticipated to require pile driving, under conditions where such activities are required peak vibration levels of above 0.644 PPV and 104 VdB could occur at adjacent receptors that are located less than 25 feet from the activity. As individual development projects would be spread over the Specific Plan's 20 -year build out period and construction events are short-term in nature, it is anticipated that there would be an infrequent amount of vibration events at sensitive land use receptors. However, depending on how close an actual receptor location is to a construction site and the type of building the receptor is (e.g., non -engineered timber and masonry building, historical building, etc.), the vibration levels at a receptor location could exceed the FTA's vibration thresholds for building damage and human annoyance. As such, vibration impacts during construction associated with the proposed Specific Plan could be potentially significant. Implementation of Mitigation Measures N0I-2 through NOI-4 would prohibit the use of construction equipment that generates high levels of vibration (i.e., large bulldozers, loaded trucks, caisson drills, and jackhammers) within specified distances from existing land uses that are located nearby the new development sites proposed under the Specific Plan, would ensure that the construction -related vibration impacts associated with building damage and human annoyance at these nearby receptors would be reduced to a less -than -significant level. Additionally, implementation of Mitigation Measure N0I-8 would serve to ensure the safety of existing historic buildings located within the Specific Plan area by requiring a certified structural engineer to analyze and provide evidence that no structural damage would result at these buildings due to the construction of adjacent new developments. With implementation of Mitigation Measures N0I-6 through N0I-8, impacts related to groundborne vibration would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: Mitigation Measure N0I-2: Approval of development permits shall ensure that the operation of construction equipment that generates high levels of vibration, such as large bulldozers, loaded trucks, and caisson drills, shall be prohibited within 45 feet of existing residential structures and 35 feet of institutional structures during construction of the various new developments in the Specific Plan area. Instead, small rubber -tired bulldozers shall be used within this area during demolition and/or grading operations to reduce vibration effects. Mitigation Measure N0I-3: Approval of development permits shall ensure that the operation of jackhammers shall be prohibited within 25 feet of existing residential structures and 20 feet of Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.8-32 ESA / D930953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures ......... — ,, 3.8 Noise and Vibration institutional structures during construction activities associated with the various new developments proposed in the Specific Plan area. Mitigation Measure N0I-4: Approval of development permits shall ensure that where a new development would be constructed adjacent to an existing historic building within the Specific Plan area, the project developer shall require by contract specifications that a certified structural engineer be retained to submit evidence that the operation of vibration -generating equipment associated with the new development would not result in any structural damage to the adjacent historic building. Contract specifications shall be included in the construction documents for the new development, which shall be reviewed by the City prior to issuance of a construction permit. Significance after Mitigation: Less than significant ,aerations While groundborne vibration within and surrounding the Specific Plan area may currently result from heavy-duty vehicular travel (e.g., refuse trucks, delivery trucks, and transit buses) on the nearby local roadways, the proposed land uses under the proposed Specific Plan would not result in the increased use of these existing heavy-duty vehicles on the local roadways. As such, vibration impacts associated with operation of the future residential and non-residential developments implemented by the proposed Specific Plan would be less than significant. Future development in the Specific Plan area would introduce residential uses in the immediate vicinity of the Metrolink line. As described previously, trains are a common source of groundborne vibration, where locomotive -powered passenger trains traveling at 50 mph can generate vibration levels up to approximately 84.5 VdB (0.067 in/sec PPV) at 50 feet from the track centerline. Given that future mixed use developments located along Bogart Avenue, south of Ramona Boulevard, could be located as close as 73 feet from the Metrolink line, the resulting vibration levels at these developments could reach up to 82 VdB (0.05 in/sec PPV) (FTA, 2006). It should be noted that the vibration level of 82 VdB is a conservative estimate, as trains making a stop at the Baldwin Park Metrolink Station would be coming in at much lower speeds than 50 mph when entering the Specific Plan area. However, because not all trains would make a stop at the Baldwin Park Metrolink Station, it is assumed for the purpose of conducting a worst-case analysis that these trains could be traveling at speeds up to 50 mph. Metrolink currently operates 38 passenger trains and UPRR operates four freight trains daily through this area, with the trains running 24 hours a day for seven days a week. Thus, a total of 42 vibration events could be experienced by land uses that are located in the immediate vicinity of the Metrolink line. Under FTA criteria, vibration events occurring between 30 and 70 times per day are considered to be occasional events. As discussed previously, under conditions where there are an occasional number of vibration events per day, the FTA has established a threshold of 75 VdB for residences and buildings where people normally sleep. Thus, because future mixed use developments associated with the proposed project could be exposed to vibration levels that exceed 75 VdB from the trains traveling through the Specific Plan area, impacts on these future developments would be potentially significant. To reduce this impact, Mitigation Measure N0I-5 would be implemented to require all future mixed use developments with a residential component Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.8-33 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 3 8 Noise and Vibration located within 150 feet of the Metrolink line to conduct a vibration analysis to ensure that these future developments would not be exposed to a vibration level exceeding 75 VdB from trains traveling through the Baldwin Park Metrolink Station.4 With implementation of Mitigation Measure N0I-5, impacts from vibration related to the Metrolink track usage would be reduced to a less -than -significant level. Mitigation Measure: Mitigation Measure N0I-5: Prior to City approval of developments including residential uses within the Specific Plan area that are located within 150 feet of the Metrolink line, the applicant shall be required to provide evidence to the City Planning Division that the residential uses of the mixed-use development would not be exposed to vibration levels exceeding 75 VdB (0.02 in/sec PPV) from the Metrolink tracks. Where this vibration criteria is exceeded for a mixed use development, the applicant must implement measures to reduce the vibration levels to below 75 VdB, which may include, but is not limited to, the design of adequate setback distances. Significance after Mitigation: Less than significant Impact 3.8-3: Implementation of the project could result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project. The noise environment in the City of Baldwin Park are primarily transportation -related, with local traffic being the most significant source of community noise. Within the Specific Plan area, major roadways that have been identified in the City's General Plan Noise Element that carry substantial traffic volumes include Ramona Boulevard, Badillo Street, Baldwin Park Boulevard, Pacific Avenue, and Maine Avenue. Because the project includes development of residential, mixed-use, open space and civic uses that would generate additional population within the Specific Plan, most of the permanent noise levels that would be generated would primarily be traffic -generated noise. The Specific Plan would contribute to an increase in local traffic volumes, which results in higher noise levels along local roadways. Based on the traffic study prepared for the proposed project, included as Appendix D of this EIR, in combination with an analysis of the surrounding land uses, roadway noise levels were forecasted to determine if the proposed Specific Plan's vehicular traffic would result in a substantial increase in noise at receptor locations located within and in proximity to the Specific Plan area. The increases in noise levels at selected roadway segments are identified in Table 3.8-13, as shown traffic noise levels within and in proximity to the Specific Plan area would slightly increase with build out of the proposed Specific Plan. 4 Based on FTA's data on groundbome vibration levels generated by locomotive powered trains, vibration levels would be below 75 VdB for trains traveling at 50 mph at a distance of 150 feet from the track centerline. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.8-34 ESA! D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures ..... ......... - .._...... mw ....... 3.8 Noise and Vibration TABLE 3.8-13 ROADWAY NOISE LEVELS WITH PROJECT Existing Plus Existing Project Noise Level at 50 feet from Roadway Center Line (dBA Noise Significance Significant Roadway Segment CNEL) Increase Threshold Impact? Ramona Boulevard West of Merced Avenue 69.4 69.8 0.4 5.0 No East of Merced Avenue 69.2 69.6 0.4 5.0 No West of Stewart Avenue 69.1 69.5 0.4 5.0 No East of Stewart Avenue 69.0 69.5 0.5 5.0 No West of Baldwin Park Boulevard 69.6 70.0 0.4 5.0 No East of Baldwin Park Boulevard 68.8 69.6 0.8 5.0 No West of Cesaer Chavez Drive 68.9 69.5 0.6 5.0 No East of Cesaer Chavez Drive 68.7 70.3 0.6 5.0 No West of Maine Avenue 68.9 70.2 1.3 5.0 No East of Maine Avenue 68.6 69.1 0.5 5.0 No West of Bogart Avenue 67.9 68.5 0.6 5.0 No East of Bogart Avenue 68.3 68.9 0.6 5.0 No West of Downing Avenue 68.2 68.8 0.6 5.0 No East of Downing Avenue 68.4 68.9 0.5 5.0 No West of Badillo Street 68.4 68.9 0.5 5.0 No North of Badillo Street 62.1 63.0 0.9 5.0 No Badillo Street West of Puente Avenue 69.0 69.4 0.4 5.0 No East of Puente Avenue 68.4 68.8 0.4 5.0 No Los Angeles Street West of Maine Avenue 68.1 68.2 0.1 5.0 No East of Maine Avenue 67.1 67.1 0.0 5.0 No Clark Street West of Maine Avenue 59.6 59.9 03 5.0 No East of Maine Avenue 58.7 59.0 03 5.0 No Palmrose Street East of Maine Avenue 52.7 52.7 0.0 5.0 No Bogart Avenue East of Pacific Avenue 54.7 57.2 2,5 5.0 No Downing Avenue West of Pacific Avenue 49.3 49.3 0.0 5.0 No East of Pacific Avenue 57.1 57.6 0.5 5.0 No Big Dalton Avenue West of Pacific Avenue 57.0 57.0 0.0 5.0 No East of Pacific Avenue 41.3 41.3 0.0 5.0 No Baldwin Park Boulevard West of Merced Avenue 68.5 69.0 0.5 5.0 No East of Merced Avenue 68.7 69.2 0,5 5.0 No Merced Avenue North of Ramona Boulevard 64.3 64.3 0.0 5.0 No South of Ramona Boulevard 64.4 64.4 0.0 5.0 No North of Baldwin Park Boulevard 64.8 64.9 0.1 5.0 No South of Baldwin Park Boulevard 66.1 66.2 0.1 5.0 No ...____. ........... __ Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project __ .1,11 3.8-35 ......... ----.......................... ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures -............................................................ . 3,8 Noise and Vibration TABLE 3.8-13 ROADWAY NOISE LEVELS WITH PROJECT Existing Plus Existing Project SOURCE: The Mobility Group, 2014. As shown in Table 3.8-13, the traffic volumes introduced by build out of the proposed Specific Plan would increase local noise levels by a maximum of 2.5 dBA CNEL at the roadway segments of Bogart Avenue, east of Pacific Avenue. As the noise increases would not exceed the identified thresholds of significance, these traffic noise impacts would be less than significant. In addition, Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.8-36 ESA I D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 Noise Level at 50 feet from Roadway Center Line (dBA Noise Significance Significant Roadway Segment CNEL) Increase Threshold Impact? Stewart Avenue North of Ramona Boulevard 58.9 58.9 0.0 5.0 No South of Ramona Boulevard 57.7 57.7 0,0 5.0 No Baldwin Park Boulevard North of Ramona Boulevard 67.9 68.2 0.3 5.0 No South of Ramona Boulevard 68.1 68.8 0.7 5.0 No Cesaer Chavez Drive North of Ramona Boulevard 55.1 55.7 0.6 5.0 No Maine Avenue North of Los Angeles Street 66.7 66.9 0.2 5.0 No South of Los Angeles Street 64.0 64.2 0.2 5.0 No North of Clark Street 63.9 64.1 0.2 5.0 No South of Clark Street 64.0 64.1 0.1 5.0 No North of Palmrose Street 64.1 64.5 0.4 5.0 No South of Palmrose Street 64.0 64.4 0.4 5.0 No North of Ramona Boulevard 63.9 64.9 1.0 5.0 No South of Ramona Boulevard 64.0 65.1 1.1 5.0 No Pacific Avenue North of Bogart Avenue 69.1 69.7 0.6 5.0 No South of Bogart Avenue 69.1 69.7 0.6 5.0 No North of Downing Avenue 69.1 69.7 0.6 5.0 No South of Downing Avenue 69.1 69.7 0.6 5.0 No North of Big Dalton Avenue 69.0 69.6 0.6 5.0 No South of Big Dalton Avenue 68.9 69.5 0.6 5.0 No Bogart Avenue North of Ramona Boulevard 57.7 58.0 0.3 5.0 No South of Ramona Boulevard 53.5 54.2 0.7 5.0 No Downing Avenue North of Ramona Boulevard 53.6 53.9 0.3 5.0 No South of Ramona Boulevard 55.2 55.5 0.3 5.0 No Lozano Drive South of Ramona Boulevard 47.6 47.6 0.0 5.0 No Puente Avenue North of Badillo Street 58.0 58.2 0.2 5.0 No South of Badillo Street 61.4 61.6 0.2 5.0 No SOURCE: The Mobility Group, 2014. As shown in Table 3.8-13, the traffic volumes introduced by build out of the proposed Specific Plan would increase local noise levels by a maximum of 2.5 dBA CNEL at the roadway segments of Bogart Avenue, east of Pacific Avenue. As the noise increases would not exceed the identified thresholds of significance, these traffic noise impacts would be less than significant. In addition, Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.8-36 ESA I D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures ......... ......... . �...... 3.8 Noise and Vibration as the other roadway segments that are located even further away from the Specific Plan area than those analyzed in Table 3.8-13 would experience less traffic increases due to the proposed project, the increase in local noise levels at those roadway segments would also not exceed the identified thresholds of significance, and impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation required Significance Determination: Less than significant Impact 3.8-4: Implementation of the project could result in a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project. During implementation of the proposed Specific Plan, temporary or periodic increases in noise levels in the Specific Plan area would result primarily from construction activities associated with the proposed residential and non-residential developments. As individual development projects would be spread over the proposed Specific Plan's 20 -year build out period and occur, the construction activities for each new development would expose their respective nearby existing uses to increased noise levels. Construction noise impacts associated with each new individual development would be short-term in nature and limited only to the period of time when construction activity is taking place for that particular development. As the Specific Plan area is currently built with existing land uses, the new developments associated with the project would likely be constructed immediately adjacent to existing structures within the Specific Plan area. Given this proximity, these existing land uses in the Specific Plan area would be exposed to construction -related noise levels that are greater than the existing ambient noise levels. Based on the noise levels for general outdoor construction activities shown in Table 3.8-9, noise levels at adjacent off-site receptors that are located within 50 feet of a construction site could reach up to 89 dBA Leq or above. Under conditions where the distance between a new development and an existing land use is closer than 50 feet, the construction noise levels experienced by the existing land use would be even greater. Through the environmental review and development permit process, the City will consider all future discretionary developments associated with the proposed Specific Plan on a case-by-case basis to ascertain whether an individual development would generate a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels on its surrounding off-site uses. When necessary, the City would require the implementation of mitigation measures to minimize noise levels and reduce potentially significant impacts. However, for the purposes of this EIR, it is assumed that there would likely be future developments associated with the proposed project in the Specific Plan area that would be located in close enough proximity to existing land uses such that the construction noise levels generated would result in a substantial temporary increase in ambient noise levels at those existing land uses. Mitigation Measures N0I-6 through N0I-9 would be implemented to reduce construction -noise impacts on existing sensitive receptors to the maximum extent feasible, under circumstances where future construction sites within the Specific Plan area are located immediately adjacent to existing sensitive land uses, the noise impacts Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.8-37 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 3... Noise and Vibration-. �,.......... - �n related to a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels above levels existing without the proposed project would remain significant. Therefore, this impact would be significant and unavoidable. Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measure N0I-6: The City shall ensure that project approvals within the Specific Plan area state that equipment and trucks used for project construction shall utilize the best available noise control techniques (e.g., improved mufflers, equipment redesign, use of intake silencers, ducts, engine enclosures and acoustically -attenuating shields or shrouds). This shall be implemented through conduction of a preconstruction meeting between the City's job inspector(s) and the general contractor or onsite project manager to confirm that noise and vibration mitigation and practices (including construction hours, sound mufflers on equipment, neighborhood notification, posted signs, etc.) are implemented. In addition, the City shall ensure that project approvals within the Specific Plan area require project applicants to designate a construction relations officer to enforce the construction noise minimization measures and serve as a liaison with surrounding residents and property owners and be responsible for responding to any concerns regarding construction noise and vibration. The liaison's telephone number(s) shall be prominently displayed at construction locations. Mitigation Measure N0I-7: The City shall ensure that project approvals within the Specific Plan area include design measures to reduce the construction noise levels, which may include, but are not limited to, locating stationary construction equipment and construction staging as far from adjacent receptors as possible, muffling noisy activities with an enclosed temporary sheds, incorporating noise barriers/curtains, reduction in the amount of equipment that would operate concurrently at the development site, or other similar measures. Mitigation Measure N0I-8: The City shall ensure that project approvals within the Specific Plan area require that the use of construction equipment or construction methods with the greatest peak noise generation potential shall be minimized. Examples include the use of drills and jackhammers. When impact tools (e.g., jack hammers, pavement breakers, and caisson drills) are necessary, they shall be hydraulically or electrically powered wherever possible to avoid noise associated with compressed air exhaust from pneumatically powered tools. Where use of pneumatic tools is unavoidable, an exhaust muffler on the compressed air exhaust shall be used; this muffler can lower noise levels from the exhaust by up to about 10 dBA. External jackets on the tools themselves shall be used where feasible; this could achieve a reduction of 5 dBA. Quieter procedures, such as use of drills rather than impact tools, shall be used whenever feasible. Mitigation Measure N0I-9: If pile driving activity is determined to be required as part of the construction activities, then: • Pile driving and other extreme noise generating activities shall be limited to between 8:00 am and 4:00 pm, Monday through Friday; • Alternate "quiet" pile driving technology (such as pre -drilling of piles, use of vibratory or hydraulic equipment instead of impact pile drivers, the use of more than one pile driver to W....... . . .. ..---.-.- .... ........... — - --- ... Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.8-38 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures ___..... m° 3 8 Noise and Vibration shorten the total pile driving duration) shall be implemented, where feasible, in consideration of geotechnical and structural requirements and conditions; and • Neighbors within 300 feet of project construction involving pile -driving shall be notified at least 30 days in advance of pile -driving activities about the estimated duration of the activity. Significance after Mitigation: Significant and unavoidable.. Cumulative Impacts Cumulative noise and vibration impacts are primarily analyzed in terms of impacts within the Specific Plan area, as these impacts are primarily confined to local areas. The Specific Plan area is fully urbanized, and the proposed Specific Plan identifies sites that have the potential for redevelopment, infill development, and/or adaptive reuse of existing under-utilized structures to better serve the City's Downtown area. The construction activities associated these new developments in the Specific Plan area would generate elevated noise and vibration levels in the immediate vicinity of each development site. Noise is by definition a localized phenomenon, and significantly reduces in magnitude as distance from the source increases. Consequently, only projects and growth due to occur in the immediately adjacent areas would be likely to contribute to cumulative noise impacts. Increases in noise at sensitive uses would occur as a result of construction activities under the proposed project. All construction projects in the City would be required to comply with Section 130.04 of the City's municipal code, which limits any act of construction, reconstruction, or demolition of any building or structure, including, but not limited to, grading operations at any lot located in the City to between the hours of 7:00 am to 7:00 pm. Construction noise would be temporary, and Mitigation Measures N0I-2 through N0I-9 are provided to reduce the impact of the noise levels generated. Aside from future development projects associated with the proposed Specific Plan, two other related projects (related projects #7 and #10) that consist of residential and commercial uses are also located within the Specific Plan area. As such, the construction activities for these two related projects could also potentially coincide with the construction activities for future development projects associated with the proposed Specific Plan. While implementation of Mitigation Measures N0I-2 though N0I-9 would require implementation of noise reduction devices and techniques during construction activities, which would reduce construction noise levels and would reduce the potential of projects resulting in a cumulative noise impacts to be less than cumulatively considerable. Construction of new development in the Specific Plan area would also produce temporary vibration impacts by exposing adjacent land uses to elevated vibration levels. As discussed, implementation of Mitigation Measures N0I-6 through N0I-9 would reduce impacts related to excessive groundborne vibration levels at sensitive receptors during construction from each development project, such that a cumulative combination of vibration effects would be less than considerable. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.8-39 ESA I D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting„ Impacts, and Mitigation Measures ........ 3.8 Noise and Vibration Through implementation of development specific environmental review and development permit process, the City would consider all future proposed developments in the Specific Plan area to ascertain whether the operational noise levels generated by an individual development could result in exceedance of the City's noise standards, which regulate the appropriate location for various types of uses in relation to noise generation. Development permits are provided pursuant to the applicant's compliance with City Municipal Codes related to noise, which are provided to reduce potential noise impacts. With implementation of the existing City noise regulations, operational noise from the development of new land uses within the Specific Plan area would not combine with related projects to result in a cumulatively considerable increase in ambient noise from operating land uses. The primary noise source contributing to cumulative operational noise levels from future development projects under the proposed Specific Plan and related projects would be traffic. Cumulative mobile source noise impacts would occur primarily as a result of increased traffic on local roadways due to implementation of the proposed project, ambient growth, and other developments in the City. Therefore, cumulative traffic -generated noise impacts have been assessed based on the contribution of the proposed project to the future cumulative base traffic volumes on the roadway segments located within and in proximity to the Specific Plan area. The noise levels associated with existing traffic volumes and cumulative traffic volumes are identified in Table 3.8-14. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.8-40 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 c m 0 w 0 z ro t+i U) U Q a 2 O Y O N d 75 d 7 Lfi Ld') d; d' tom- � LO N LO LO LO 0 M LO Om 'I: ° O.0 7 0 O O O O b O r 0 0 b 0 0 0 0 00 O O O O O r Co O Q7 a « E c oU U Cl. Y C V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 0 O z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z C U) v 'O C O V N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O LO LY 0 LO LO to LO LO U') M LO 0 0 0 LO LO LO LO LO L1') LO IO LO LO Ln LO 1n C � N > > Lv CO CD M M CO N 0 0 ti M 0 0 0 M O M 00 00 V M (0 U1 M W 0 0 0 0 0 N O 0 0 O O O O O O O M 00 E � C U L Y V N M N O M� O 0 N (D LO 0 CO N M Cl) 00 N LO LO N M N (o 0 o Y E V 0 o 0 o 6 o 0 0 0 0 m co (Di 0 of m m ti h r- 0 1- h (0 ti 1- O 0 (O O 0 w O O rn co CD Co ti Co O o 6 co LO c+i LO Co LO 0 I` -It LO .N� N O � �a CR LL co 0 o Mo T. D. O (0 LO LO O M [F N � O V w � w M LO LO 00 LO Ln O O V (D V: .N.. C d 7 > m m m m ti m f00 m m m CMO (0D (MD (0o (0D CND (OD (00 ((o ((0 (bD LOO LLo m v LO Y LL. v d r' E 0 3 p N — O (D W (A N (A CO 0 M N N ti M � M> 0 0 0 CA 6 M O w w M N w w 00 w N LT co 0o C`- 0 00 N LO It LO 0 h V LO C C1 r (0 co 0 (D (D (0 (D (D (D CO (D f0 Co (0 O (D CO (O Q, (0 LO LO .- w F D -0 T N W > > > o° 1. 6 7 a) a O Q N O N a k m m 7 N C C O C C C N C N> C C C> > al > N (0 [O L (4 O C a) a) Q > N C > W O C N > > C C O C N O a. m F G d j 3 C a) � C 0 O d 0 w 0 N C_ y y U 0 w CD ',,,, d`` 3 D N c4 C C cz C 10 Y C in C C a] r .0 U d U U s: E to ° U) i5 m m U U m m �° (° °0 d d d O to � d Q a d 2 o 0 0 0 o p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 N o 0 m o 0„ ° N N O a 0 CO 0 �0 = i u c 0 m o a m Y m° m m (D m 0 m m aa) cc aa) m (D cc a�'i a` ) E� w� w� w� w w i z m w m o w Y w m E w o w o w o w w� w� w m J L) a m o 0 c ° > ., ° d w N at = O O Cl) V: O O O — O O M (.0 U') N N N M M CT O ((i U) LO to (O (O 0 Zs 6 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 Q ¢ 0. c __ GU w U C ai V O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z C .21 N a1 V 10 C C (J N O O O O 0 0 C. 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 al r0 L6 In In l0 Lr; M L6 In In (f) If) 6 M M (n U7 r0 (f) (f) l0 L6 Lf; Lr5 Lr; vi L6 C � �L ~ U1 d > m % 75 -It CD v,ainLf) It 0)M w rl- cweotirnrn V)co E C) o o 0 0 0 0 0 o r o 0 0 0 0 0 0 � c U L V c u � cc N EV' MCR W 1` e0 M (O M O O V; O V: (0 r- 1` 0 0) V• (Q N N N N O V U O 0 O tiM (O V' 0) (O (O '-d- V' LO CO co (0 (0 (O CA 00 (n to CO O (O (0 (O W) r'- V' 'C V' W) It (O ((i (O (O (O (O CO (0 (0 (O O O O O O O ti ti ti 1` 1.- 1- 7 51 > N 3a cq LL Cr) Cl) G O C-4 d C V; Cl) Cl) V 1• W M (O Cl) O (O 00 M (0 U) (n ti M (n CO I` ti I� rl- q r0 y .• t` 66 4 4 6 (O 6 W oo W (n r- a v V v 4 d' 4 0) 0) 0) O 0 0) 7 7 o 0 u) v (0 (0 (O (0 (O (0 r0 (O (0 CO (O 0 O 0 (O 0 (0 (D CO M c0 O (0 CO (0 LL F- U) N a a, 0E N' O O M (O N M d' W 7 0) 1� W7 17N O O) O c-• O W O r 0 0) C h CO 00 V' V' V' co 00 N 1® W (O 0 00 V• a a M 0) 0) 0) W 0) CO U V (O V' co O CO (O CO O rl'7 (C') O (0 LO (IS (O CO 0 c O CO co 0 (O co O O O O O N W H a -o > > -° a> a -° 'o -° -2 'o ° ° a v °� a� m m CO a>i a) v >m a>i Cn u� a� a>i m a°i a j C 7 j 7 Y Y j 7 5 7 j N j 0 7 C N>> O N a>7 >> m m a a m m> m m> m O N N N m m >> Q a C C v a C Q) >> Q N N of [6 S (6 (a •�. ca p� Of — N N M co Q Q O -.2 .O ) E o 3 o o o o o Q co Y ° o o r 0 o E aci w°_-- (' 0°0 aai ° N� d m Q E m (u F D o a CD Q N m (6 m 0 R w -19 (O w> (6 7 p J O U is m N Co C O m O 0 m o In d a7 Q' _ CO _ > Q-' (0 Q' A 2' C J _ U LL _ Q' Co m m ro ° o w a o O Q ° ° ° ° Q ° ° a ° ° U ° > ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° > Q ° ° ° ° ° ° cw (a O C .O L w L +L••, �' L L C L .r�' L Q L w t .L.,, L .L-. L .�. C.1 y 0 0 C O N m W N � W 0 0 0 0 0 y z (n z m 3 0 0� z U) O O z U) A O d z C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0= '(p z U z m z N z 0� 0 0 0 0 0 z w z w z w m p` w ''m m cn m U a 0 O M N d (0 a5 M (O Cl) N O N (D o a 0 2 a 6 0 6 0 C 0 C) ® Q c 0 c (D 0 U ? U) w E O V C w 10 w z z z z z z z a N c ro a t6 d > � o v t O O O O O O O O U ;= y N (O (O to (O N N •3 .ri ~ d ni e ® d n E ami o d > d m 6 n > o 7` (- N (O co O O (n N co 0- 0 E � C) O O O L Y U U 0 w 0 W O o c uU) d « M �... d d' r N CR (O O E o V 3 (LO � � U OD LO (NO V d O a) d Cl) O>0 7 = ® a co LL a) M (D a E O a. (") ' E a O O CL 'C f rn (O v, eo L o aD ` a+ > 3 -ItM In (O Ln (O (O co V co (O CD O 7 O L)c c a) E LL Lro CL X c >a a roarcs ® Q a) = ta ® E p o E o N = O O _9's rg-- tl�0 CR N aC O V p o d C n O 80 U0 Loo d'.' CI"J $ r ca N Nu w B N 8 C8 W U Q5 a1 O `3 a sL-+ 3 (D N o E ® > 3 nY U O ® a$ (D 0 U (D Co ® N p c N O D - U N a) h W V U_ C > > > > > N d a1 U N d d d j d d a) '.,. a) o 5 � ® N n cc v O O 7 O O 7 O (D `) > 4. 'u a M CO m m (6 m N (n Lp L d O z N ®Q a E N C O a7 C C7 C C ® S > Q E C d E E d C c E E E; O 0 c c h fA �W ® c ° E o o o 0 fn > O Q O C> O ,� a o � p D Q p O t 3 zO ®® c w 7 C O O w C O d L N d u. (D E m m oinaz(n C O O d W W 0 >)L --5P �° m°z°cOnQz(0n 9ca m .a 0 h F- 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 3,8 Noise and Vibration As shown, cumulative development in 2035 would increase local noise levels by a maximum of 3.5 dBA CNEL at the segment of Bogart Avenue, east of Pacific Avenue, which would not exceed 5.0 dBA CNEL. All of the remaining roadways analyzed would also not be exposed to noise increases that would exceed 5.0 dBA CNEL. Therefore, the cumulative impact associated with mobile source noise at all of the analyzed roadway segments would be less than significant. Additionally, implementation of the proposed project would only increase the cumulative base traffic noise levels by a maximum of 1.8 dBA CNEL at the roadway segment of Bogart Avenue, east of Pacific Avenue, while all of the other remaining analyzed roadway segments would experience even lower noise increases from the proposed project. Significance Determination: Less than cumulatively considerable. References — Noise California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 1998. Technical Noise Supplement (TeNS), A Technical Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol. October. City of Baldwin Park, 2002. Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan, Noise Element. Federal Transit Administration (FTA). 2006. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment. May. Metrolink. 2015. Comment letter for: City of Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan. February. The Mobility Group. 2014. City of Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan EIR, Draft Traffic Study. December. Office of Planning and Research. 2003. State of California Genera Plan Guidelines. October. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.8-44 ESA! D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 3.9 Population and Housing Introduction This section evaluates the potential population and housing impacts of the proposed Specific Plan. The section describes the local area's existing and projected population, employment, and housing conditions. It also evaluates the project's population and housing impacts in relationship to local plans and applicable population and household growth and policies established by SCAG for the San Gabriel Valley Association of Governments (San Gabriel Valley) Subregion. 3.9.1 Environmental Setting Population The City of Baldwin Park had an estimated population in 2013 of 76,635 (Census, 2014). Table 3.9-1 shows recent total population growth trends and current total population estimates for the City of Baldwin Park and the County of Los Angeles as a whole. TABLE 3.9-1 HISTORICAL POPULATION GROWTH FOR CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AND LOS ANGELES COUNTY (1990 — 2035) % Change % Change 1990 2000 2010 (1990 —2010) (2000— 2010) Baldwin Park 69,300 75,837 75,390 8.8% -0.6% Los Angeles County 8,878,157 9,519,338 9,818,605 10.6% 3.14% SOURCES: U,S. Census Bureau, 1990; U.S. Census Bureau, 2000; U.S. Census Bureau, 2010, SCAG, 2012 Between 1990 and 2010, the total population in Baldwin Park increased at approximately the same rate (8.8 percent) as Los Angeles County as a whole (10.6 percent). Since 2000, however, the City's population growth rate (-0.6 percent overall) has slowed considerably compared to that for the County (3.14 percent overall). This decline in population within the City of Baldwin Park and Los Angeles County parallels the decline in population in California as a whole from 2000- 2007 (LAEDC, 2010). Housing As provided in Table 2-4 in Section 2.0, Project Description, the Specific Plan area currently contains 101 residential units. According to the U.S. Census Bureau's survey sample -based estimates (U.S. Census Bureau, 2013), the size of the City of Baldwin Park's housing stock grew by about 1,891 units between 2000 and 2013, but the composition of the housing stock remained about the same. Single-family detached residences account for more than two-thirds (71.40 percent) of the City's housing stock, including many that are rented, since only about 55 percent of the stock is owner -occupied. The median household income grew modestly over the 13 -year Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.9-1 ESA I D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3 Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures ..a . ......... 3,9 Population and Housing period by $9,807, but the median home value increased 113 percent and median gross rent increased by approximately 58 percent (U.S. Census Bureau, 2000, 2013). Baldwin Park's housing stock is also characterized by older buildings, large households, and significant overcrowding. As of 2013, about 80 percent of the housing units were in structures that are 30 or more years old, nearly one-quarter of the occupied units (23 percent) were moderately to severely overcrowded by census standards, and average household sizes were among the largest in the County at 4.4 people per household (U.S. Census Bureau, 2013). These trends and characteristics, and similar data for Los Angeles County, are shown in Table 3.9-2. TABLE 3.9-2 HOUSING STOCK CHARACTERISTICS IN THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AND LOS ANGELES COUNTY, 2000 AND 2013 Baldwin Park 2000 Los Angeles County 2013 2000 2013 Characteristic No. % No. % I No. % No. % Total Units Occupied Units Owner -Occupied Renter -Occupied Vacancy Rate Units in Structure SF Detached SF Attached MF 2-4 Units MF 5+ Units Mobile Homes/Other Median Price Median Monthly Rent Median Household Income Average Household Size (persons) 17,429 100.0% 16,961 97.3% 10,349 61.0% 6,612 39.0% 2.7% 19,320 100.0% 17,758 91.9% 10,679 60.1% 7,079 39.9% 9.3% 11,746 67.4% 13,788 71.4% 1,861 10.7% 2,450 12.7% 601 3.4% 827 4.3% 2,878 16.5% 2,116 10.9% 343 2.0% 139 0.7% $146,400 $419,700 $724 $1,145 $41,629 $49,755 4.43 4.40 SOURCE: U.S. Census, 2000; U.S. Census, 2013. 3,270,909 100.0% 3,462,431 100.0% 3,133,774 95.8% 3,247,705 93.8% 1,499,744 45.9% 1,477,894 45.5% 1,634,030 49.9% 1,769,811 54.5% 4.2% 4.8% 1,593,516 48.7% 1,716,977 49.6% 241,571 7.4% 223,727 6.5% 287,524 8.8% 276,725 8.0% 1,091,677 33.4% 1,191,274 34.4% 56,621 1.7% 53,728 1.5% $209,300 $574,100 $704 $1,205 $42,189 $54,529 2.98 3.2 Between 2000 and 2012, permits were issued for 752 new residential units, or approximately 63 units per year (SCAG, 2012). Of those units, 673 were issued for new single family homes as shown in Table 3.9-3, and 21.2 percent of those were issued between 2010 and 2012 (CIRB, 2000-2012). This implies less growth in the City's housing stock in recent years than the U.S. Census Bureau estimate described above. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.9-2 ESA / D206368 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures m 3.9 Population and Housing TABLE 3.9-3 NEW RESIDENTIAL HOUSING UNITS WITH BUILDING PERMITS IN BALDWIN PARK (2000 — 2006) Year Single -Family Multi -Family Total New Housing Units 2000 27 3 30 2001 61 4 65 2002 91 70 161 2003 74 0 74 2004 136 15 151 2005 31 3 34 2006 73 6 79 2007 21 0 21 2008 11 0 11 2009 6 0 6 2010 10 0 10 2011 62 0 62 2012 70 070 Total 673 101 774 SOURCE: Construction Industry Research Board, 2000-2012 As provided in Section 2.0, Project Description, the Specific Plan area currently contains 101 residential units. Assuming 4.4 persons per household (consistent with the census average), the plan area is estimated to have approximately 444 residents. Employment According to the Proposed 2012-2035 Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy Growth Forecast prepared by SCAG, there were 18,147 jobs in 2007 (California Employment Development Department, 2007-2012; InfoGroup, SCAG). In 2012, there were 16,987 jobs in the City, a decrease of 6.4 percent from 2007. An estimated 9.4 percent of those jobs were projected to be in retail, 5.3 in construction, 30.6 percent in education, and 54.7 percent in other sectors (SCAG, 2012). Baldwin Park's share of total jobs in the San Gabriel Valley Subregion is 2.5 percent. The median household income in the City was $43,546 in 2010, slightly under the average for the San Gabriel Valley ($43, 960), both of which were below the countywide average ($53,559) (SCAG, 2012, California EDD). As provided in Section 2.0, Project Description, the Specific Plan area currently contains 289,136 square feet of non-residential employment generating uses. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.9-3 ESA A D206368 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures -. 3.9 Population and Housing • • • • • • r • ! ' • - • SCAG produces socioeconomic projections, which are used by SCAG to develop planning documents, such as the RTP, AQMP, and Regional Housing Plan. As shown in Table 3.9-4, SCAG projects that the City of Baldwin Park's 2035 population will increase to 82,200 (9.0 percent); the number of households will increase 18,600 (8.1 percent); and the total number of jobs will increase to 19,200 (16.1 percent). SCAG projections show that the City of Baldwin Park's population, number of households, and jobs will grow much more slowly than in the Subregion as a whole over the projection period. More specifically, the SCAG forecast is for the San Gabriel Valley Subregion's 2035 population to increase to 2.1 million (17.7 percent); the number of households in 2035 will increase to 637,000 (13.4 percent); and the total number of jobs in 2035 will increase to 930,914 (16.1 percent). TABLE 3.9-4 POPULATION, HOUSEHOLDS AND JOBS PROJECTIONS FOR BALDWIN PARK AND THE SAN GABRIEL VALLEY SUBREGION, 20081 TO 2035 Total Households2 Baldwin Park 17,200 17,900 2008- 700 2020- 700 2008- 008- 1,400 8.1% 2008- 2008- 2020 2020- 2035 2008- 2035 48,000 8.14% 2020 Percent 2035 Percent 2035 Percent Geographic Area 20081 2020 2035 Change Change Change Change Change Change Total Population 19,200 700 4.0% 900 4.9% 1,600 9.0% Baldwin Park 75,400 78,200 82,200 2,800 3.7% 4,000 5.1% 6,800 9.0% SGV Subregion 1,802,000 1,921,000 2,121,000 319,000 177% 200,000 10.4% 319,000 17.7% Total Households2 Baldwin Park 17,200 17,900 18,600 700 4.0% 700 3.9% 1,400 8.1% SGV Subregion 552,000 589,000 637,000 37,000 6.7% 48,000 8.14% 85,000 13.4% Total Jobs Baldwin Park 17,600 18,300 19,200 700 4.0% 900 4.9% 1,600 9.0% SGV Subregion 801,131 872,439 930,419 70,308 8.9% 57.980 6.7% 129,288 16.1% Jobs to Households Ratio SGV Subregion 1.386 1,409 1.322 0.023 1.7% -0.087 -6.2% -0.064 -4.6% 1 Values for 2007 and 2013 are based on straight-line interpolations between 2005 and 2010, and 2010 and 2015, respectively, in the SCAG forecast. 2 The number of households is equivalent to the number of occupied housing units. SOURCE: SCAG, 2012. 3.9.2 Regulatory Setting This subsection summarizes relevant population and housing policies contained in SCAG's RCP and RTP/SCS, the Southern California Compass Growth Vision, and the RHNA, as wells as the City of Baldwin Park's General Plan. -. - • •111 • • • :, SCAG is the federally -designated MPO for the six -county Southern California region consisting of Los Angeles, Ventura, Orange, San Bernardino, Riverside, and Imperial counties. SCAG is Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project...., - -- - 3,��,.�m..... 9-4 ESA / D206366 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 ......... ......... ... 3. Environmental Setting. Impacts. and Mitigation Measures 3,9 Population and Housing responsible for developing regional plans for transportation, growth management, and hazardous waste management, and a regional growth forecast that is the foundation for these plans as well as for the regional air quality plan developed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). SCAG prepares several plans to address regional growth, including the RCPG, the Southern California Compass Growth Vision, the RHNA, the RTP, the RTIP, and annual State of the Region reports to measure progress toward achieving regional planning goals and objectives. Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide The RCP, which was adopted by SCAG in 2008, is a major advisory plan prepared by SCAG that addresses important regional issues like housing, traffic/transportation, water, and air quality. The RCP serves as a framework for decision-making by local governments, assisting them in meeting federal and state mandates for growth management, mobility, and environmental standards, while maintaining consistency with regional goals regarding growth and changes through the year 2035 and beyond (SCAG, 2008). Further, the RCP lays the groundwork for the more robust 2012 update of the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), and recommends key roles and responsibilities for public and private sector stakeholders and invites them to implement reasonable policies that are within their control. The RCP, like several other SCAG policy documents, divides the six -county region into 14 subregions. Some subregions consist of entire counties (e.g., Orange, San Bernardino, Imperial, and Ventura counties), while others include multiple sub -county areas (e.g., Los Angeles and Riverside counties). The project site is located within the San Gabriel Valley Subregion, one of eight subregions in Los Angeles County. The RCP consists of chapters that contain goals, policies, implementation strategies, and technical data that support the overall vision for the region, which is to foster a southern California region that addresses future needs while recognizing the interrelationship between economic prosperity, natural resource sustainability, and quality of life. The Land Use and Housing chapter of the RCP are particularly relevant to population and housing. The Land Use and Housing Chapter includes advisory strategies for linking land use and housing to transportation planning, and how the choices we make about how land should be used and what kinds of buildings we construct. Its goals include maximizing the efficiency of the existing and -planned transportation network, providing necessary amount and mix of housing for a growing population, enable a diverse and growing economy and protect important natural resources. As part of a triennial process of updating the federally mandated RTP, SCAG is responsible for producing socioeconomic forecasts and developing, refining, and maintaining macro and small- scale forecasting models. These forecasts are developed in close consultation with a Technical Advisory Committee comprised of local government and other public agencies, DOF, County Transportation Commissions and other major stakeholders. The forecasts are developed in five- year increments through the year 2035. The forecast is relied upon for preparation of the RTP, the AQMP, RTIP, and the RHNA. Consistency with the growth forecast, at the subregional level, is Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.9-5 ESA / D206366 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures . ,,,,_.__ _ 3.9 Population and Housing one criterion that SCAG uses in exercising its federal mandate to review "regionally significant" development projects for conformity with regional plans. SCAG's current forecast is the one prepared for the 2012-2035 RTP, which utilizes 2010 Census data as a baseline. Based on SCAG's 2012 Forecast (included in Table 3.2-5 above), the San Gabriel Valley Subregion had approximately 552,000 households in 2008. By 2020, SCAG forecasts an increase to 589,000 households and a further increase to 637,000 in 2035. These household forecasts represent a growth of approximately 85,000 additional households (13.4 percent) within the San Gabriel Valley Subregion between 2008 and 2035. SCAG Southern California Compass Growth Vision Report The SCAG Southern California Compass Growth Vision Report (Compass Growth Vision), published in June 2004, presents a comprehensive growth vision for the six -county SCAG region, as well as achievements in the process of developing the growth vision. It details the evolution of the draft vision from the study of emerging growth trends and systematic modeling of the effects of alternative growth pattern scenarios on transportation systems, land consumption, and other factors. The Compass Growth Vision Report notes that population and household growth trends, and existing housing conditions point to an unmet demand for a greater diversity of housing throughout the six -county region. For example, while existing multi -family units account for a substantial proportion of the overall supply (i.e., approximately 40 percent), multi -family buildings are being added to the total housing stock at a much lower proportion. As a result, the demand for multi -family housing (e.g., from young adults and seniors, etc.) is outpacing multi- family housing production. Local City of Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan Adopted in November 2002, the City of Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan contains policies that regulate the use of land within the City, including the project site and its vicinity, and provides a long-term vision for the future physical evolution of the City as it seeks to achieve its desired future (City of Baldwin Park, 2002). Following are goals and policies of the Economic Development Element and the Housing Element that are relevant to the project. Economit: Development Element The Economic Development Element guides economic development planning and initiatives, consistent with the other Elements of the City's General Plan. It identifies the economic factors affecting the City of Baldwin Park, presents economic development goals and policies, and identifies how the Economic Development Plan will help the City achieve its goals. The goals in the Economic Development Element that are relevant to population, housing and employment issues and the proposed project include: Goal 1.0: Encourage and facilitate activities that expand the City's revenue base and increase taxable retail and non -retail sales. Baldwin Parks TOD Specific Plan Project 3.9-6 ESA / D206368 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures --...... ---- 3.9 Population and Housing Policy 1.1: Secure the existing commercial tax base through the preservation of existing commercial centers and the enhancement of areas with further development potential. Policy 3.2: Promote development of a small-scale commercial retail zone that serves the business community through travelers. Goal 4.0: Establish a pedestrian core for Downtown, with pedestrian linkages to adjacent activities. Policy 4.1: Identify retail and entertainment niches that draw upon Baldwin Park's unique Downtown to create a pedestrian friendly environment. Policy 4A: Encourage the development of visitor -related retail and entertainment uses. Policy 6.4: Target areas to expand local -servicing office and professional service activities and expand job opportunities that generate a higher wage potential. Housing Element The Housing Element sets forth goals, policies, and programs to address the City's existing and projected need for housing in the community in terms of affordability, availability, adequacy, and accessibility, pursuant to state law. The goals and supporting policies in the Housing Element that are relevant to the project are the following: Goal 3.0: Provide adequate residential sites through appropriate land use and zoning designations to accommodate the City's regional share of housing needs. Policy 3.1: Provide for a range of residential development types in Baldwin Park, including low density single-family homes, small lot single-family subdivisions, medium density townhomes, and higher density apartments and condominiums. Policy 3.2: Implement the Land Use Element, and facilitate development of mixed-use residential projects near Downtown and along North Maine Avenue. Policy 3.3: Maintain consistency between General Plan land use policies and the Zoning Code. Policy 3.4: Continue to provide opportunities for infill housing development in R-3 zones, in the City's Redevelopment areas, and in Mixed -Use areas. Policy 3.5: Promote mixed-use and higher density housing in close proximity to commercial areas and transportation routes for accessibility to services. 3.9.3 Impacts and Mitigation Measures In accordance with Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, the project could have a significant impact on population and housing if it would: - ..,.. .,.., ..... -. _...— —- ----------- --..... . .... -__ Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.9-7 ESA / D206368 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures ........ 3 9 Population and Housing • Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or infrastructure); • Displace a substantial number of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere; or Displace a substantial number of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. Impacts related to the potential to induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly or indirectly were found to be potentially significant in the Initial Study prepared for this project and are further analyzed below. However, the Initial Study determined that the proposed project would have no impact from displacing substantial numbers of existing housing units or people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere (see Appendix A). In contrast, the proposed project would encourage infill development that would result in additional residential units within the Specific Plan area. Therefore, these issues are not discussed below. The focus of environmental analysis prepared under CEQA is a project's potential to cause effects on the physical environment.) Accordingly, the CEQA Guidelines state that while economic or social information may be included in an EIR, or may be presented in whatever form the lead agency desires; social, and economic effects shall not be treated as significant effects on the environment.2 The CEQA Guidelines make clear that there must be a physical change resulting from the proposed project directly or indirectly for an impact to be considered significant.3 Social and economic effects, including employment, are relevant CEQA issues to the extent that a chain of cause and effect can be traced from a proposed project through anticipated social and economic changes resulting from the project, to physical changes caused in turn by the economic and social changes (CEQA Guidelines, Sections 15131(a) and 15064(f)). If a project's physical impacts would cause social or economic effects, the magnitude of the social or economic effects may be relevant in determining whether a physical impact is "significant" (CEQA Guidelines Section 15131(b)). If the physical change causes adverse economic or social effects on people, those adverse effects may be used as the basis for determining that the physical change is significant (CEQA Guidelines, Section 15064(f)). I "Environment" means the physical conditions which exist within the area which will be affected by a proposed project, including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, noise, and objects of historic or aesthetic significance (Pub. Res. Code §21060.5). 2 CEQA Guidelines §15131(a) and 15064(f); see also Public Resources Code §21100 and 21151. "Significant effect on the environment" means a substantial, or potentially substantial adverse change in the environment (Pub. Res. Code §21068). 3 See discussion following CEQA Guidelines §15131. _..... __ ......... ........ ....---- ... . ... ......... Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.9-8 ESA / D206368 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2016 3, Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures .,, — ....... �....., 3.9 Population and Housing Population Impacts Population impacts are based on an analysis of the probable number of residents associated with the number of dwelling units planned for the project. The scale of projected Specific Plan area population is then compared with official population growth forecasts for Baldwin Park and the San Gabriel Valley Subregion. There are no other relevant population growth goals or policies in SCAG's RCPG, or the City's General Plan. Housing and Household Impacts Housing impacts are based on the number of new dwelling units planned for the project. The project proposes a total of 833 new dwelling units upon build -out. The scale of this new housing is then compared with applicable adopted SCAG household growth forecasts for Baldwin Park and the San Gabriel Valley Subregion, and housing goals and policies in SCAG policy documents, and the City of Baldwin Park General Plan. Employment Impacts The employment impacts of the project are analyzed from several different, but related, perspectives. The projected scale of the project's employment is compared with applicable regional employment growth forecasts for Baldwin Park and the San Gabriel Valley Subregion. 3.9.5 Impact Analysis Impact 3.9-1: Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or infrastructure). New housing development implemented under the proposed Specific Plan would involve up to a net total increase of approximately 833 residential units, as well as approximately 289,135 square feet of non-residential employment generating uses. This new development would result in population growth as it provides new homes and businesses in Downtown Baldwin Park. Using the average household size of 4.4 (consistent with the Census data), the addition of approximately 833 residential units into the area, the proposed project could generate a population of approximately 3,665 persons. The SCAG estimates listed in Table 3.9-5 show that the average household size is expected to remain the same in the year 2035, which would result in a population increase of 3,665 through the 2035 horizon year of the proposed Specific Plan. This range represents a conservative estimate, because it assumes that the maximum number of residential units allowed under the Specific Plan would be constructed and occupied. SCAG estimates that by build -out of the proposed Specific Plan (2035), the City of Baldwin Park will have a total population of 82,200; this is an increase of 5,565 residents over the 2013 population estimate of 76,635. Therefore, the population generated by the proposed project would be within the projections of SCAG. The addition of the 833 residential units is within the growth in the number of households that SCAG has forecast for the City of Baldwin Park. As shown in Table 3.9-5 SCAG forecasts that Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.9-9 ESA ( D206368 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures -11 1-- --------- 3.9 Population and Housing Baldwin Park would see an increase of 1,400 households, which is equivalent to approximately 1,474 dwelling units, including the vacancy rate of five percent4. In addition, the proposed project would involve a net total of approximately 289,135 square feet of non-residential employment generating uses. Assuming an average of 383 square foot of space per employee for community retail land uses (U.S. Green Building Council, 2014), the project could generate approximately 755 employees in the area, which would occur incrementally over the 20 -year Specific Plan build out. It is anticipated that most of these positions would be retail or other commercial related positions that do not require a specialized workforce, it is anticipated that these jobs would be filled by people already living in the area and would not induce an unanticipated influx of new labor into the region. Construction of projects that would occur within the Specific Plan area would include need for construction labor. Due to the employment patterns of construction workers in southern California, and the market for construction labor, construction workers are not likely, to any significant degree, to relocate their households as a consequence of the job opportunities presented by the project. The construction industry differs from most other industry sectors in several important ways that are relevant to potential impacts on housing: • There is no regular place of work. Construction workers commute to job sites that change many times in the course of a year. These often lengthy daily commutes are made possible by the off-peak starting and ending times of the typical construction work day. • Many construction workers are highly specialized (e.g., crane operators, steel workers, masons), and move from job site to job site as dictated by the demand for their skills. • The work requirements of most construction projects are also highly specialized and workers are employed on a job site only as long as their skills are needed to complete a particular phase of the construction process. It is reasonable to assume that project -related construction workers would be drawn from the existing labor force in the surrounding area, and would not relocate their households' places of residence as a consequence of working on the project. While the population generated by the proposed project would represent a large portion of the estimated population and household projections, Baldwin Park is a largely built out City and future development will consist mostly of smaller infill, mixed use, redevelopment, and transit - oriented developments. Development that would occur under the proposed Specific Plan would help Baldwin Park accommodate anticipated growth as opposed to substantially increasing population, and the residential development that would occur under the proposed project would help to meet housing demands from projected population growth in the City and the region. Although it represents a large portion of projected population growth, it would not exceed the estimated projections on which the City has based plans related to provision of public services, 4 The California Department of Housing and Community Development considers five percent to be a "normal" vacancy rate that is indicative of a healthy housing market, see http://www.hcd.ca.gov/hpd/hrc/rtr/chp6r.htm. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.9-10 ESA f D206368 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures ..... 3.9 Population and Housing utilities, and other amenities to maintain the current quality of life it provides its residents. As such, the project would not induce substantial population growth in the project area, and the project would result in less than significant impacts related to population and housing. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation required Significance Determination: Less than significant Cumulative Impacts The proposed Specific Plan would take place in a mostly built -out area of the City, would result in a net increase in the City's population over the 20 -year build out period of the proposed Specific Plan. This new population would be housed in dwelling units that would be developed by implementation of the proposed Specific Plan. This new housing would not, by itself, be growth inducing because the areas surrounding the Specific Plan area are already built -out and served by existing infrastructure. As shown on Table 2-6 in Section 2.0, Project Description, there are several related projects within the City of Baldwin Park, which would result in a total of 163 additional residential units (73 of which are within the Specific Plan area), 59,000 square feet of commercial development (5,900 square feet are within the Specific Plan area), 34,079 square feet of warehouse space, and 936 square feet of office space. The two projects located within the Specific Plan area would provide commercial and residential uses that would be consistent with, and thus implement, the proposed Specific Plan. In addition, this new population has been anticipated by the various utilities and public service providers and other agencies that rely on SCAG's population projections for anticipating future impacts on various resources. Development according to the Specific Plan, in combination with the development of cumulative projects in the area, would accommodate, rather than induce, population growth. Therefore, the project would not result in a cumulatively considerable impact related to population and housing. Significance Determination: Less than cumulatively considerable Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.9-11 ESA / D206368 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2016 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures ......... ®„ ,,, .. , -------- 3.9 Population and Housing w E •111111111 lillill F111111 111111111111111 Jill 11 • • • •` City of Baldwin Park, Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan, November 20, 2002. Los Angeles County Economic Development Corporation (LAEDC), San Gabriel Valley, Los Angeles County, California 2012 Economic Forecast and Regional Overview (prepared for The San Gabriel Valley Economic Partnership), litt .Y W crrrrtctrt/trlaltrtad /20 d 2/0fatl Rclitar t;a 1 22.;a accessed November 2014. Southern California Association of Governments, Profile of the City of Baldwin Park, �a�rfm)cu��e��tslBaidwi�l'!lzwk.accessed November 2014. Southern California Association of Governments, Regional Comprehensive Plan, 2008, ti if v wW c.:r cat. vv/NewsAn:oMedizt/1'wages/1 eL,ioa alCotrrg)teliet)sivel'l min ti p, accessed November 2014. Southern California Association of Governments, 2012-2035 Regional Transportation Plan/Growth Forecast Appendix, 1111 pL:/ ascs.scg1 c�l._&gy/l)octianeiits/2012/riii ti/Sl�l2�01„2f 'l,lI Orowtlll"orc,c:��st,, )(J accessed November 2014. Southern California Association of Governments, 2012-2035 Regional Transportation Plan/San Gabriel COGAt-A-Glance, lrq1;r:///%vvvw.scag.cpt roy/Docr.rn tll /l tr ra': l �l .pr9f°; accessed November 2014. Southern California Association of Governments, 5t” Cycle Regional Housing Needs Assessment Final Allocation Plan (January 1, 2014 -October 1, 2021), lrtllrr//rtlwcw.,,t,t,..rlvflalalor slrllwalSllr(...ylll Nrr�;..11.....Rtlam�a3:f., accessed November 2014. Southern California Association of Governments, Final Regional Housing Need Allocation Plan - Planning Period (October 2013- June 30, 2021) for Jurisdictions within the Six -County SCAG Region, approved by the SCAG Regional Council on October 4, 2012, http://rtpscs.scag.ca.gov/Pages/Regional-Housing-Needs-Assessment.aspx, accessed November 2014. U.S. Census Bureau, American Fact Finder, Population Finder, 1990, with data available through 2013, 9jt111 /11a.c1,1'itrcicr2.certsq.ts..c rll�al lMr tvP sf/pMyes/col tItill ity fitcts XI]tl'll 1, accessed November 2014. U.S. Green Building Council. Building Area Per Employee By Business Type. Downloaded November 2014 htf11,//www.usgb .ort, T,)(e,s/Arclarve/C ejieral/Does41 I Ixdf Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.9-12 ESA 10206368 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting. Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3.10 Public Services Introduction This section analyzes the proposed Specific Plan's potential impacts to police protection, fire protection and emergency medical response services, public schools and, parks, at build out. This section is based on comparisons of existing and anticipated levels of service with build out of the proposed Specific Plan. Information within this section has been obtained from each of the respective service providers. 3.10.1 Environmental Setting Fire Protection The Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACFD) provides fire protection and emergency medical services in Baldwin Park, and operates one fire station in the City, which is Station No. 29, located at 14334 East Los Angeles Street and is about 0.12 mile from the Specific Plan's northern boundary. Station No. 29 houses a three-person engine company, a two -person paramedic squad, and a four -person quint, which is a combination engine/ladder truck apparatus. All personnel are assigned to one of three shifts (A -shift, B -shift and C -shift) and rotate every 24 hours, maintaining 24/7/365 constant staffing (Enriquez, 2015). Fire Station No. 29 includes two Fire Captains, two Firefighters Specialists (apparatus drivers), three Firefighter Paramedics, and two Firefighters. Of the three firefighter paramedics assigned to this station—two are on the squad and one is on the engine. The second LACFD Fire Station that would serve the Specific Plan area is Station No. 48, located at 15546 East Arrow Highway in Irwindale, approximately 1.4 miles from the Specific Plan area. Station No. 48 is staffed with a four -person engine company, and all personnel are employed full time and assigned to a 24-hour work shift (Enriquez, 2015). Within the service area for Station No. 29, approximately 4,333 emergency calls were taken in 2014. Of these calls, approximately 94 were related to fires; 3,601 were medical emergencies; and the rest were calls on miscellaneous issues (Enriquez, 2014). The average response time to an emergency in 2014 was three to four minutes, which is within the recommended goal of the American Heart Association access time to defibrillation of three to five minutes (Enriquez, 2015). Police Protection Services The Baldwin Park Police Department (BPPD) provides police protection services and operates one station, which is located at 14403 Pacific Avenue within the -Specific Plan area:adjacent7 to the Metrolink station. The City operates a Type 1 (pre -arraignment) jail in the basement of the City Hall.I The jail has two holding cells and a total capacity for 16 beds. The Police Department has 70 full-time sworn positions and 24 full-time non -sworn positions. The sworn positions include one police chief, two captains, four lieutenants, 10 sergeants, 14 I California Code of Regulations 15 CA ADC § 1006, a Type I facility is a local detention facility used for the detention of persons for not more than 96 hours excluding holidays after booking. Such a Type I facility may also detain persons on court order either for their own safekeeping or sentenced to a city jail as an inmate worker, and may house inmate workers sentenced to the county jail provided such placement in the facility is made on a voluntary basis on the part of the inmate. As used in this section, an inmate worker is defined as a person assigned to perform designated tasks outside of his/her cell or dormitory, pursuant to the written policy of the facility, for a minimum of four hours each day on a five day scheduled work week. Baldwin Park TOD specific Plan Project 3.10-1 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3, Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures _� 3.10 Public Services detectives, 38 patrol officers, and one traffic officer (Bartolotti, 2015). The BPPD maintains a targeted staffing ratio of at least one sworn police officer per 1,000 residents. With a current population of 76,635, the current ratio of sworn officers to residents is 0.92 officers per 1,000 residents. On average, the BPPD responds to approximately 40,700 calls for service per year (Bartolotti, 2015). Incoming calls, both emergency and non -emergency calls, are received at a City -operated dispatch center. Then calls are assigned a response priority and are dispatched to police and fire department responders by radio. The average response time for 911 calls is five minutes and eight seconds. The City is divided into four geographical beats patrolled by uniformed police car patrols with the occasional bicycle patrol. Baldwin Park has a community policing program that provides the following programs: • Foot and bike patrol; • Baldwin Park Explorers;2 • Neighborhood and business watch programs; • Clergy Council and Chaplin Program; and • Police Department Volunteer Program. • Los Angeles Interagency Metropolitan Police Apprehension Crime Task Force: Multi - agency task force for the enforcement of narcotics laws, with additional responsibilities for the investigation of terrorists activities. The Baldwin Park Unified School District (BPUSD) provides public school services within the Specific Plan area. BPUSD is a K-12 district with a 2013-2014 student enrollment of approximately 18,767 (Ed -data, 2014). Its boundaries coincide with the City's boundaries. BPUSD operates thirteen elementary schools, four junior high schools, two comprehensive high schools, a continuation high school, a children's center, and a continuing adult education program. Over the past ten years, from the 2003-2004 school year to the present, student enrollment has decreased by approximately 520 students or approximately 2.8 percent. Within this 10 -year period, student enrollment peaked in the 2009-2010 school year to approximately 20,379 students, but has decreased annually since to 18,767 (Ed -data, 2014). There are no existing BPUSD schools located within the Specific Plan area; however, several schools are located within one-quarter mile of the plan area, which include Baldwin Park High, 2 The Baldwin Park Police Department Explorer Program is designed for youths 14 to 21 years of age. After graduating from the San Gabriel Valley Law Enforcement Explorer Academy, police officers work with the explorers in an effort to provide community service. Officers also provide insight and guidance to explorers who decide to pursue a career in law enforcement. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.10-2 ESA! D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures ..... �_. ,,.. ........ 3.10 Public Services Central Elementary, and Vineland Elementary. In addition, Jones Junior High School is located 0.81 miles from the Specific Plan area. In addition to the Baldwin Park's public schools, four private schools operate within the City's boundaries, one of which (St. John Baptist) is located within the Specific Plan area: • Creative Planet School of Arts (K-8), located at 4428 North Stewart Avenue, 0.45 miles from the Specific Plan area; • East Valley Adventist (K-8), located at 3554 North Maine Avenue, 0.60 miles from the Specific Plan area; • St. John Baptist (K-8), located at 3870 Stewart Avenue 0.26 miles from the Specific Plan area; and • Mid -Valley Learning Center (7-12), located at 13940 Merced Avenue, 0.54 miles from the Specific Plan area. Parks and Recreation According to the Open Space and Conservation Element of the City of Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan, the City of Baldwin Park currently maintains six City parks, providing approximately 28.3 acres of recreational space. Table 3.10-1 provides an overview of the parksy. TABLE 3.10-1 PARKLAND BY CATEGORY WITHIN BALDWIN PARK Type Acreage Regional Parks Santa Fe Dam Recreation Area 836 City Parks Morgan Park 12 Barnes Park Central Park West 5.6 Roadside Park 3.6 Walnut Creek Nature Park 2.0 Syhre Park 4.0 Teen Center and Skate Park 1.1 Total 864.3 SOURCE: City of Baldwin Park, 2002. Residents also have access to approximately 172 acres of joint -use school playground facilities on an as -needed basis (City of Baldwin Park, 2002). Additionally, Baldwin Park residents have the use of additional County regional parks that are not located within the City, which are listed in Table 3.10-2. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.10-3 ESA f DI 30963 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Se 3.10 Public Services Name Impacts and Mitigation Measures TABLE 3.10-2 LOS ANGELES COUNTY REGIONAL PARKS Amenities Distance from Acreage Baldwin Park (miles) Whittier Narrows Fishing lakes, comfort stations, picnicking Recreation Area areas, playgrounds, a nature center, an equestrian facility, trails, a multipurpose athletic complex, a military museum, soccer 1,400 8.4 fields, volleyball courts, and archery, skeet, pistol and trap ranges. Tennis courts are also provided and include a pro shop Schabarum Regional Park Eighteen -station fitness trail, hiking, biking, horseback riding, an equestrian center, 640 10.8 picnic areas, soccer fields, playgrounds, and group picnic areas Frank G. Bonelli Regional 250 -acre lake for swimming, water skiing, Park wind surfing, sailing, water theme park, boat rentals, hot tubs, an equestrian center, wedding chapel, recreational vehicle camp 1,980 12 sites, trails for hiking, biking and horseback riding, play equipment, gazebos, and group rental picnic areas. Food and beverage concessionaires. Castaic Lake Recreation Two bodies of water, sailing, power boating, Area water and jet skiing, fishing, boat rentals, tackle bait shop, non -power boating, 8,800 57.3 canoeing, hiking, biking trails, picnic areas, playgrounds, recreational vehicle, tent camping, and rental group picnic areas Kenneth Hahn Recreation Hiking, fishing, and group and family Area picnicking, children's play areas, community 370 28.6 center, and a man-made lake Total 14,030 N/A SOURCE: Los Angeles County Parks and Recreation WebsiteSia�nrkartmri.ar�4¢;yzrtJtR�yi yt;�,accessed November 2014. 3.10.2 Regulatory Setting State Senate Bill 50 Senate Bill (SB) 50, also known as the Leroy F. Greene School Facilities Act of 1998 (School Facilities Program), was originally established to streamline the state's school construction funding process. The program provides grants to school districts to match local contributions for new construction and modernization projects, based on "unhoused pupils," from revenues obtained through the sale of State General Obligation Bonds when approved by voters in statewide elections. It provides funding for higher education facilities, K-12 facilities, modernization of older schools, additional funding for districts in hardship situations, and funding for class size reduction. The School Facilities Program also establishes the mandated CEQA mitigation measure for impacts related to school capacity and prohibits the denial of a land use application on the basis of school capacity. The CEQA mandated mitigation measure is the collection of fees to be used by schools affected by the proposed development. The base fee that Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.10-4 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3Environmental SetYmg Imp, _ ....... ... ......... 3.10 Public Services can be levied for all new residential development is $2.14 per dwelling unit and $0.34 per square foot for new commercial and industrial development. Additional fees can be levied if the applicable school district meets certain criteria, such as approval of a five-year school facilities plan. Local City of Baldwin Park General Plan The City of Baldwin Park General Plan describes issues and provides goals and policies related to public services provided for Baldwin Park residents. The following General Plan policies for public services are relevant to the Specific Plan project: Police and Fire Goals and Policies Crime Prevention Goal Goal 5.0: Provide a safe environment for the community of Baldwin Park. Crime Prevention Policies Policy 5.1: Periodically evaluate levels of service to ensure Baldwin Park has appropriate levels of police service. Policy 5.2: Continue the City's aggressive program of Community Based Policing to enhance public awareness and participation in crime prevention. Policy 5.3; Continue to cooperate with the Los Angeles County Sheriff s Office, along with other nearby police departments, to provide back-up police assistance in emergency situations. Policy 5.4: Promote the use of defensible space concepts (e.g., site and building lighting, visual observation of open spaces, secured areas) in project design to enhance public safety, Urban Fire Goal Goal 4.0: Protect the life and property in Baldwin Park from the destruction of urban fires. Urban Fire Policies Policy 4.1: Periodically evaluate level of service to ensure Baldwin Park has appropriate levels of fire service. Policy 4.2: Maintain fire and building code requirements for new construction to ensure provision of adequate fire protection. Require all new commercial and multi -unit residential development to install fire protection systems, and encourage the use of automatic sprinkler systems. Policy 4.3: Maintain mutual aid agreements with surrounding jurisdictions for fire protection. Policy 4.4: Provide public information about fire safety and emergency preparedness to residents, schools, and organizations. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.10-5 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3, Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures --------- ------ , 3.10 Public Services Parks and Open Space Goals and Policies Goal 4.0: Ensure that the costs of park and recreation facilities and programs are borne by those who benefit and contribute to additional demands. Policy 4.1: Require that developers contribute to provide parks and recreational facilities to offset additional demands brought about by new development. City of Baldwin Park Municipal Code State Subdivision Map, Section 66477 (The Quimby Act), allows the legislative body of a city or county, by ordinance, to require the dedication of land, the payment of fees in -lieu of, or a combination of both, for park and recreational purposes as a condition to approval for a final tract map or parcel map. The Quimby Act requires that development set aside land, donate conservation easements, or pay fees for park improvements. The goal of the Quimby Act is to require development to help mitigate the impacts of property improvements. The City of Baldwin Park collects Quimby Fees for recreational impacts. Sections 154.001 and 154.002 of the City's Municipal Code implement the Quimby Act for the City: Section 154.001 Fees paid pursuant to this subchapter shall be deposited into the Park Facilities Fund maintained by the City Treasurer, and shall be used solely for the acquisition of new and rehabilitation of existing community park and recreational facilities. Section 154.002 (B): The amount of land to be dedicated for neighborhood and community park or recreational facility or fees to be paid in lieu thereof shall be based on the residential density of the proposed development, which shall be determined on the basis of the number of dwelling units to be constructed and the density factor as set forth in division (C) of this section, so as to provide three acres of park area for 1,000 residents. Only payment of fees shall be required if a development project contains 50 parcels or less except when a condominium project, stock cooperative, or community apartment project, as those terms are defined in California Civil Code Section 1351, exceeds 50 dwelling units, dedication of land may be required notwithstanding that the number of parcels may be less than 50. (C): As used herein, the term Density Factor means 4.44 persons per dwelling unit, based upon the most recently available Census, or Census taken pursuant to Cal. Gov. Code Section 40200 et seq. (D): When a fee is to be paid in lieu of or in addition to parkland dedication, the amount of such fee shall be the fair market value, as determined pursuant to Section 154.007, per acre of the land within the proposed residential development multiplied by the number of acres required to be dedicated pursuant to this section, except that the amount of the fee shall be calculated as provided in Section 154.003 when the construction consists solely of adding a second residential unit to property containing only one single-family dwelling unit. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.10-6 ESA / D1 30953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures .. ....,.......m,,, ........ .. _....._. 3,10 Public Services Baldwin Park Comprehensive Park and Recreation Master Plan Adopted in 2007, the City of Baldwin Park Comprehensive Park and Recreation Master Plan (Master Plan) is a policy document that provides recommendations to establish, help maintain, update, and expand the City's park and recreation system. The Master Plan is intended to provide a recommended blueprint for the City as the City grows and provides guidance on park and recreational services for the next ten years (City of Baldwin Park, 2007). The following Master Plan goals and policies are relevant to the Specific Plan project: Goal 1: Provide active and passive recreation opportunities conveniently accessible to residents. Goal 2: Provide inclusive, accessible, and affordable recreational programs and places. Goal 3: Support and enhance individual and community health and wellness — social, physical, emotional, intellectual, career, environmental, and spiritual. 3.10.3 Thresholds of Significance In accordance with Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, the project could have a significant environmental impact on public services if it would: 6 Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services; — Fire protection, — Police protection, — Schools, — Other public facilities, • Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated; or Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. 3.10.4 Methodology The methodology for this analysis included corresponding with the various public services agencies that provide services within the Specific Plan area to request current information about service ratios, response times, performance objectives, number of apparatus devoted to the Specific Plan and its vicinity, etc. and reviewing web -based information about these agencies. Additionally, federal, state, and local regulations were reviewed for project applicability. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.10-7 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3, Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures 310 Public Services 3.10.5 Impact Analysis Impact 3.10.1: Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered lire protection facilities or the need for new or physically altered fire protection facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for the fire department: Implementation of the proposed Specific Plan project would result in an increase of 289,135 square feet non-residential development, 833 dwelling units that would generate a maximum of 3,665 additional residents (assumes no vacancy) and 755 employees at build out over the 20 year planning period (see Section 3.2, Population and Housing). Thus, the Specific Plan would increase the demand for additional fire protection services. As described above the Specific Plan area is within 1.5 miles of two fire stations (Station 29 and 48) that currently provide services to the area. The proposed Specific Plan would result in infill development, increased density, and therefore, an increased number of emergency calls and an increase in maintenance needs related to facilities and equipment, this increase would occur gradually over the incremental implementation of the proposed plan and the fire department would add staff, equipment, and maintenance on an as -needed basis in order to accommodate these increased demands over the 20 year planning period. Service in the Specific Plan area and the vicinity would continue to be served by the two existing stations, and new or physically altered fire protection facilities would not be required to serve the build out of the Specific Plan. Individually proposed development projects within the Specific Plan area would require incorporation of fire detection and suppression systems (fire alarms and sprinklers), emergency access (fire lanes), and properly placed fire hydrants as required by the Municipal Fire Code. These project design elements are reviewed and approved by the public works and fire departments prior to receipt of development permits for every project in the City. These existing City procedures further minimize potential impacts associated with provision of fire protection services. Therefore, implementation of the Specific Plan would not require provision of new or physically altered fire protection facilities construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts. Hence, the Specific Plan would result in less than significant impacts related to fire protection services. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation required Significance Determination: Less than significant Impact 3.10.2: Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered police protection facilities, need for new or physically altered police protection facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for the police department: Baldwin Park Tao Specific Plan Project -..----....... ....,.... , ..3.10-8 .,,,,,..... ............. ESA I..D1.096330 3 ,...... Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures ....... 3.10 Public Services As described in Section 3.2, Population and Housing, implementation of the Specific Plan would result in a maximum population increase of 3,665 additional residents (assumes no vacancy) and approximately 289,135 square feet of non-residential development that would result in approximately 755 employees. As described above, Baldwin Park is slightly below the staffing goal of one sworn officer per thousand population and has a current ratio of 0.92 sworn officers per 1,000 residents. Based on the City's staffing goal, an addition of approximately 3,665 new residents would require approximately four sworn officers by build out of the Specific Plan (a 20 year timeline). Hence, the City would need to hire an additional four officers by build out of the Specific Plan area to maintain the current ratio of 0.92 officers per 1,000 residents. The demand for police services and facility/equipment maintenance needs would increase gradually over the incremental implementation of the Specific Plan and the police department would add staff, equipment, and maintenance services on an as -needed basis in order to accommodate these increased demands. Because the City has one police station, which is located adjacent to the Metrolink station within the Specific Plan area, implementation of the Specific Plan would not require new or physically altered facilities, construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts. Hence, the Specific Plan would result in less than significant impacts related to police services. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation required Significance Determination: Less than significant Impact 3.10.3: Substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new school facilities or the need to physically alter existing school facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable performance objectives for the school district: The Specific Plan area north of Ramona Boulevard is within the attendance area boundaries for Baldwin Park High School. Areas south of Ramona Boulevard, and east of Maine Avenue/Pacific Avenue would attend Central Elementary School, Jones Junior High School, and Baldwin Park High School. Students located south of Ramona and west of Maine/Pacific would attend Vineland Elementary School, Jones Junior High School, and Baldwin Park High School (Dennis, 2015). Table 3.10 -3 -lists -the schools_ that would receive students thatresiding within the Specific Plan. The table provides the current enrollment, and student capacity of each school. TABLE 3.10-3 EXISTING CAPACITY OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS SERVING THE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA Available Capacity (Student Capacity less School Current Enrollment Student Capacity Enrollment) Central Elementary 509 900 +391 Vineland Elementary 785 925 +140 Jones Junior High 470 937 +467 Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.10-9 ESA I D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 Baldwin Park High School Total SOURCE: BPUSD, 2015. TMET1A u . 1,986 2.376 +390 3,750 5,138 1,388 BPUSD uses student generation rates to determine how many students would be generated by each residential unit. Table 3.10-4 below is a summary of the generation factors per the District's designated grade groupings. As shown, the Specific Plan is anticipated to generate a total of approximately 739 K-12 students at build out. TABLE 3.10-4 BPUSD STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS Students per Grade Grouping Residential Unit 833 Residential Units K-5 0.473 394 6-8 0.140 117 9-12 0.273 228 Total 739 SOURCE: BPUSD, 2015 As shown in Table 3.10-3, the two elementary schools serving the Specific Plan area, Central Elementary and Vineland Elementary, have existing capacity for approximately 391 additional students and 140 students, respectively, or a total remaining capacity for 531 students. Build out of the proposed Specific Plan would result in a total of 394 elementary school students, which would be accommodated by these two schools, and have a remaining capacity for an additional 137 elementary school students. The middle school serving the Specific Plan area, Jones Junior High School, has a remaining capacity of approximately 467 students. At build out, the proposed Specific Plan would result in a total of approximately 117 sixth to eighth grade students, which would result in a remaining capacity of 350 students. Baldwin Park High School serves the Specific Plan area and has a remaining capacity of approximately 390 students. At build out, the proposed Specific Plan is estimated to result in approximately 228 high school students, which would be within the remaining capacity of Baldwin High School. At build out of the proposed Specific Plan, a capacity of 162 students would remain at the high school. Build out of the proposed Specific Plan would not generate elementary, middle, and high school students in excess of existing capacity at area public schools. Furthermore, there would be a remaining capacity for 649 additional students within public schools that serve the specific plan area. Table 3.10-5 summarizes the remaining school capacity at build out of the proposed Specific Plan. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.10-10 ESA! D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3,10 Public Services TABLE 3.10-5 REMAINING SCHOOL CAPACITY AT BUILD OUT OF SPECIFIC PLAN SOURCE: ESA, 2015. The Leroy B. Greene School Facilities Act of 1998 prohibits the denial of a land use application because of school capacity and specifically establishes a mandated fee for mitigation of impacts under CEQA. As described above, Government Code Section 65995 authorizes school districts to collect fees on future development at a minimum of $2.14 per square foot for residential construction and $0.34 for commercial/industrial construction (Level I fees). Level I fees are adjusted every two years according to the inflation rate. Higher fees are permitted for school districts that adopt long-range school facilities plans. Class B construction fees are determined by the State Allocation Board. Government Code Section 66001 requires that a reasonable relationship exist between the amount and use of the fees and the development on which the fees are to be charged. Because these fees are required by law for mitigation of impacts to schools under CEQA, the payment of these fees would provide for funding of new facilities and would constitute mitigation of impacts to existing school facilities that serve the Specific Plan area. As described above, the current capacity of schools within the Specific Plan area would be able to accommodate the new students generated by build out of the proposed Specific Plan, and would have extra capacity for additional students. Therefore, impacts related to school facilities from implementation of the proposed Specific Plan would be less than significant. Mitigation: No mitigation required Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact 3.10.4: Substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered parks and recreation facilities, or the need for new or physically altered parks and recreation facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable performance objectives for parks and recreation. The proposed Specific Plan would result in a maximum increase in residential population of 3,665 residents (assumes no vacancy) over the 20 -year planning horizon. In order to maintain the current ratio of 0.4 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents, the proposed Specific Plan would need Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.10-11 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 Remaining Remaining Capacity of Students Capacity upon Existing Generated by Project Build - Grades Schools Project out K-5 531 394 137 6-8 467 117 350 9-12 390 228 162 Total 1,388 739 649 SOURCE: ESA, 2015. The Leroy B. Greene School Facilities Act of 1998 prohibits the denial of a land use application because of school capacity and specifically establishes a mandated fee for mitigation of impacts under CEQA. As described above, Government Code Section 65995 authorizes school districts to collect fees on future development at a minimum of $2.14 per square foot for residential construction and $0.34 for commercial/industrial construction (Level I fees). Level I fees are adjusted every two years according to the inflation rate. Higher fees are permitted for school districts that adopt long-range school facilities plans. Class B construction fees are determined by the State Allocation Board. Government Code Section 66001 requires that a reasonable relationship exist between the amount and use of the fees and the development on which the fees are to be charged. Because these fees are required by law for mitigation of impacts to schools under CEQA, the payment of these fees would provide for funding of new facilities and would constitute mitigation of impacts to existing school facilities that serve the Specific Plan area. As described above, the current capacity of schools within the Specific Plan area would be able to accommodate the new students generated by build out of the proposed Specific Plan, and would have extra capacity for additional students. Therefore, impacts related to school facilities from implementation of the proposed Specific Plan would be less than significant. Mitigation: No mitigation required Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact 3.10.4: Substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered parks and recreation facilities, or the need for new or physically altered parks and recreation facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable performance objectives for parks and recreation. The proposed Specific Plan would result in a maximum increase in residential population of 3,665 residents (assumes no vacancy) over the 20 -year planning horizon. In order to maintain the current ratio of 0.4 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents, the proposed Specific Plan would need Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.10-11 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3 10 Public Services to contribute 1.46 acres of parkland to the City's inventory of park space. According to the City of Baldwin Park 2007 Housing Element, the Parkland Impact Fee or In -Lieu fee is based on the amount of land to be dedicated that provides three acres of park area for 1,000 residents. Park area is based on the number of dwelling units to be constructed and the density factor of 4.44 persons per dwelling unit (Chapter 154: Development Fees, of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code). Parkland fees are generally approximately $6,900 per unit. The Quimby Act allows the City, by ordinance, to require the dedication of land, the payment of fees in -lieu of, or a combination of both, as a condition to the approval of a final tract map or parcel map. Each development project proposed within the Specific Plan area would be required to comply with these Municipal Code requirements related to payment of fees and/or dedication of facilities or parkland. Implementation of these requirements that would be implemented with each development project in the Specific Plan area would offset the increased demand for park and recreation facilities generated by the addition of 3,665 residents over the 20 year Specific Plan implementation. The Specific Plan area includes (and is served by) Morgan Park, which would provide park and recreation to the new residents within the Specific Plan. In addition, the proposed Specific Plan includes development of a new Arts Park to host community events and create a museum without walls for performance art, sculpture, and temporary two-dimensional art displays, which may include street furniture, landscaped open space, a water feature, small performance space and concessions. Provision of the new Arts Park would assist in offsetting recreational needs of new residents within the Specific Plan area. The new residents would also have access to Los Angeles County regional parks, as listed in Table 3.10-1 above, which would be used in addition to existing community and neighborhood parks. Overall, the addition of the 3,665 new residents over the 20 -year planning horizon are anticipated to be served by Morgan Park, the Arts Park, other City park and recreation facilities, and the existing regional parks, and implementation of the Specific Plan is anticipated to result in need for new or physically altered facilities in order to maintain acceptable performance objectives for parks and recreation. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation: No mitigation required Significance Determination: Less than Significant Cumulative Impacts The cumulative analysis area for public services includes the area served by each specific provider. The geographic context for the analysis of cumulative impacts to fire and police protection services is the City of Baldwin Park, and the geographic context for the analysis of cumulative impacts to schools is BPUSD service boundaries. The geographic area for park and recreation effects is the region, because the area is served by both City and County facilities. Additionally, the cumulative analysis for public services is based on the related projects list provided in Table 2.6 of Chapter 2, Project Description. The listed projects include projects Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.10-12 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2016 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3,10 Public Services located in the surrounding area that are currently under construction, approved but not built, or proposed for development. These projects include 12 related projects within the City of Baldwin Park, three in the City of Covina, two in the City of Irwindale, and one in the City of Rosemead. The majority of projects on the related projects list are small commercial, light industrial (warehouse), and small residential projects. The largest project (i.e., over 100,000 square feet) is the Irwindale Shopping Center located at 500 Speedway Drive in the City of Irwindale (located approximately 2.20 miles from the Specific Plan area). The largest proposed residential development comprises of 450 residential units located in the City of Covina. Fire Protection There may be an overall increase in the demand for fire protection services with the increase of developments within the City. The Baldwin Park Fire Department would add staff and equipment on an as -needed basis in order to accommodate these increased demands. Implementation of the Specific Plan can be accommodated within existing two fire station facilities and staffing capabilities, including additional personnel that would be hired in response to City population growth over the next 20 years. As shown on Table 2-6 in Section 2.0, Project Description, there are several related projects within the City of Baldwin Park that would be served by the Fire Department. These related projects would result in a total of 163 additional residential units (73 of which are within the Specific Plan area), 59,000 square feet of commercial development (5,900 square feet are within the Specific Plan area), 34,079 square feet of warehouse space, and 936 square feet of office space. The two projects located within the Specific Plan area would provide commercial and residential uses that would be consistent with, and thus implement, the proposed Specific Plan. The proposed Specific Plan in combination with these related projects would not result in the need for the Fire Department to provide new or physically altered fire protection facilities construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts. In addition, all of the individually proposed development projects within the City would require incorporation of fire detection and suppression systems (fire alarms and sprinklers), emergency access (fire lanes), and properly placed fire hydrants as required by the Fire Code. The existing City programs and procedures, along with compliance to the California Building Code, Fire Code, and City Municipal Code would assist in provision of fire protection services. Therefore, the contribution of the Specific Plan to cumulative impacts on fire protection services would not be cumulatively considerable. Police Protection As additional development occurs in the City, there may be an overall increase in the demand for police services, including facilities, personnel, and equipment. The provision of adequate police services is of critical importance to the City, and funds are allocated to these services during the annual budgeting process to ensure that police services are responsive to changes in the City. As described above, the existing police station that serves the City is located within the Specific Plan area and would not need to be expanded to serve the City at build out of the proposed Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.10-13 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, impacts and Mitigation Measures -- 3.10 Public Services Specific Plan. The Specific Plan's contribution to a cumulative impact is also less than significant because (1) the Specific Plan is anticipated to be served within the established response times; (2) no new or physically altered facilities would be constructed to accommodate the Specific Plan, the construction of which could result in significant environmental impacts; (3) adequate emergency access would be provided pursuant to the existing City plan check process; and (5) existing city programs, practices, and procedures, would continue to ensure the adequate provision of police protection services. As described above and shown on Table 2-6 in Section 2.0, Project Description, there are several related projects within the City of Baldwin Park that would be served by the Police Department. These related projects would result in a total of 163 additional residential units (73 of which are within the Specific Plan area), 59,000 square feet of commercial development (5,900 square feet are within the Specific Plan area), 34,079 square feet of warehouse space, and 936 square feet of office space. The proposed Specific Plan in combination with these related projects would not result in the need for the Police Department to provide new or physically altered police facilities construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts. Therefore, the contribution of the Specific Plan to cumulative impacts on police protection services would not be cumulatively considerable. Schools Build out of the Specific Plan area in combination with other development in the BPUSD boundaries would increase the demand on the school district. As described in above, build out of the proposed Specific Plan would not generate elementary, middle, and high school students in excess of existing capacity at area public schools. Furthermore, there would be a remaining capacity for 649 additional students within public schools that serve the Specific Plan area, which would adequately provide capacity for the related projects within Baldwin Park that, are listed on Table 2.6 of Chapter 2, Project Description. As described above, the related projects would result in a total of 163 additional residential units within the City, which is the service area of the BPUSD. The 163 residential units would generate approximately 143 students, at full occupancy of the residential units. This consists of 77 K -5th grade students, 22 6 -8th grade students, and 44 9 -12th grade students, which would be accommodated within the existing capacity of BPUSD schools. Therefore, no new or physically altered facilities would be constructed to accommodate the Specific Plan in combination with the related projects. In addition, school fees from individual development projects would be collected to fund construction of school facilities, as required and allowed by state law. Therefore, the contribution of the Specific Plan to cumulative impacts on schools would not be cumulatively considerable. Parks and Recreation The geographic context for the analysis of cumulative impacts to recreation services is City of Baldwin Park, because the Specific Plan area is primarily served by the City facilities that are listed above. As described above, the addition of new residents over the 20 -year planning horizon is not anticipated to result in need for new or physically altered facilities in order to maintain Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.10-14 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures .. .�___ .,, mW, __. 3,10 Public Services acceptable performance objectives for parks and recreation. Development of the Arts Park as part of the Specific Plan would assist in offsetting the increased need in recreation that would result from the 833 residential units that would be developed within the 20 -year implementation period of the proposed Specific Plan. The related projects would also gradually result in an increased intensity of land use and a corresponding increase in usage of park and recreational facilities. As described above, the related projects listed in Table 2.6 of Chapter 2, Project Description include development of 163 residential units within the City of Baldwin Park (73 of which are within the Specific Plan area). The proposed Specific Plan includes Morgan Park that serves the plan area, and a new Arts Park would be developed as part of implementation of the Specific Plan, and several County regional parks provide recreation facilities to areas surrounding the City. The proposed Specific Plan in addition to the related projects would not result in the need for new or physically altered park and recreation facilities that could result in environmental impacts. Therefore, the contribution of the Specific Plan to cumulative impacts on park and recreation facilities would not be cumulatively considerable. Significance Determination: Less than cumulatively considerable. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.10-15 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures ....... ....... ��� „� 3.10 Public Services References — Public Services Baldwin Park Unified School District, Baldwin Park Unified School District, accessed April, 2007. Bartolotti, Joe, Captain, Baldwin Park Police Department, email communication, January 8, 2015. California Department of Education, Private Schools, http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/si/ps/, accessed September 26, 2007. City of Baldwin Park, Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Element, November 2002. City of Baldwin Park, Appendix A, Park and Facility Inventory, file:///C:/Users/eel/Downloads/inclext;o20(�k . )df, accessed February 5, 2015. City of Baldwin Park, City of Baldwin Park Comprehensive Park and Recreation Master Plan, 2007. City of Baldwin Park Department of Recreation and Community Services, Accomplishments, accessed at http://www.baldwinpark.com/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid= 879&Itemid=218&mode=view, February 5, 2015. Enriquez, Jim, Acting Assistant Fire Chief, Los Angeles County Fire Department, email communication, January 6, 2015. Dennis, Christine, Assistant Superintendent, Administrative Services, Baldwin Park Unified School District, email communication, January 8, 2015. ISO, ISO's Public Protection Classification (PPCTm) Program, http://www.isomitigation.com/ppc/0000/ppc0001.html, accessed September 26, 2007. Los Angeles County Parks and Recreation, Parks and Recreation, http://parks.co.1a.ca.us/regionaparks.html, accessed May 10, 2007, State of California, Senate Bill 50 — Chapter 407, htti)://www.leL iiLo cc t v_/iytib/97- 98/bill/sen/sb 0001-0050/sb 550 bill 19981 827 clbal teretl.l:d accessed on February 5, 2015. U.S. Census Bureau, American Fact Finder, http://factfinder.census.gov/home/saff/main.html?_lang=en, accessed September 26, 2007. U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation, Uniform Crime Reporting Program, Crime in the US 2005, accessed at http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/05cius/data/table--04.html on February 15, 2007. Ed -data. (Ed -data, 2014). littp://www.ed- layoLits/EdDataCla le'I, _ �1mu A 1�t,sx/f: dl3tt.ta Cl r sicll`s lwcal' u�acl..�slas"? lbt;st�ca�T� 1_ layotsts/EdDataCla. w5N a l lil : )? I'ab=O0&level -06&relzort,nt ,,italbet . 16&county ° 19&drsds.1ct=64°287&school =0000000 _ Baldwin P. ..... ................. ........ ... ....... ................. ---- . Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.10-16 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures Introduction The analysis was prepared in accordance with the City of Baldwin Park Traffic Study Guidelines, and is consistent with traffic impact assessment guidelines set forth in the 2004 Congestion Management Program for Los Angeles County (CMP). This EIR section was prepared with information and analysis findings contained in the City of Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan Traffic Study, January 23, 2015, which was prepared by The Mobility Group and included as Appendix D. This traffic analysis evaluates potential Specific Plan -related impacts at 16 key study intersections that provide local and regional access to the traffic study areal and define the extent of the boundaries for this traffic impact analysis. The general location of the Specific Plan in relation to the study locations and surrounding street system is presented in Figure 3.11-1. LOS investigations at these key locations were used to evaluate potential traffic -related impacts associated with build out of the proposed Specific Plan. This section also provides mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts from build out of the proposed Specific Plan. 3.11.1 Environmental Setting Roadway Network Regional The Specific Plan area is located in the San Gabriel Valley. The closest freeways to the Specific Plan area are the San Bernardino Freeway (I-10) that runs in an east -west direction and is located to the south of the Specific Plan area and the San Gabriel River Freeway (I-605) that runs in a north -south direction and is located to the west of the Specific Plan area. The I-605 also provides access to the Foothill Freeway (I-210), which runs in an east -west direction and is located to the north of the Specific Plan area. Local North-South Roads Baldwin Park Boulevard is a four -lane roadway with a central turn lane (north of Ramona Boulevard) or raised median (south of Ramona Boulevard), and left turn lanes are provided at intersections. On -street parking is generally provided on both sides of the street with some restrictions. Maine Avenue north of the intersection with Pacific Avenue, is a four -lane street with central turn lane and left turn lanes are provided at intersections. On -street parking is not allowed on the east side of the street, and is allowed on the west side in certain areas with some time restrictions.: West of the intersection with Pacific Avenue, Maine Avenue is a two-lane local street and on - street parking is allowed on both sides of the street. t The "project study area" refers to the area that encompasses all of the study intersections. This area therefore encompasses the project site. ... _._ _...._ ,_.,,,. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.11-1 ESA / D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation 3.11 Transportation and Traffic Pacific Avenue is a four -lane street and left turn lanes are provided at intersections. On -street parking is generally provided on both sides of the street with some restrictions. Merced Avenue is a four -lane street and on -street parking is generally provided on both sides of the street with some restrictions. Stewart Avenue is a two-lane street and on -street parking is generally provided on both sides of the street. Bogart Avenue is a two-lane street and on -street parking is generally provided on both sides of the street with some restrictions. Downing Avenue is a two-lane street and on -street parking is generally provided on both sides of the street with some restrictions. Puente Avenue is a two-lane street north of Root Street and is a four -lane street south of Root Street. On -street parking is generally provided on both sides of the street with some restrictions. East-West Roads Ramona Boulevard is a four -lane street with wide curb lanes and raised median, and left turn lanes are provided at intersections. On -street parking is generally prohibited on both sides of the street. In some areas, diagonal off-street parking is provided in areas immediately parallel to and connected to Ramona Boulevard. Badillo Street is a four -lane street with raised median and left turn lanes are provided at intersections. In the Specific Plan area, on -street parking is allowed on the south side of the street but is prohibited on the north side. Clark Street is located north of Ramona Boulevard and largely just outside the Specific Plan area. It is a two-lane street with on -street parking permitted on the north side but not on the south side of the street. Left turn lanes are not provided at intersections. Big Dalton Avenue is located south of Ramona Boulevard and outside the Specific Plan area. It is a two-lane street with on -street parking permitted on the both sides of the street. Transit Services The Specific Plan area is served by a total of six transit routes, of which one is a Metro bus route, three are Foothill Transit routes, and two are Baldwin Parking Transit routes (the local City of Baldwin Park service). All of these routes have stops close to or nearby the Baldwin Park Metrolink station. The Specific Plan area is also served by the Baldwin Park Metrolink Station. Metrolink Metrolink operates 38 passenger trains daily that travel through the Baldwin Park Station. The San Bernardino Line, which stops at the station, runs between Downtown Los Angeles and San Bernardino. The train stops at the station on 16-25 minute intervals during weekday peak periods Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.11-2 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 Chapter 3: Environmental Setting, Impacts andMitigation _............... 3.11 Transportation and Traffic and about every 60 minutes on weekends. Some express trains pass through this station but do not stop. Metro Buses Metro also operates existing bus routes within the Specific Plan area. Local 190/194 runs between Cal Poly Pomona and the El Monte Metrolink station along Ramona Boulevard through the Specific Plan area. It passes through the Specific Plan area on 10- to 25 -minute intervals during weekday peak periods and with 20- to 60 -minute intervals on weekends. Foothill Transit Buses The Foothill Transit route 178 runs between Puente Hills Mall and El Monte Metrolink station. It runs along Baldwin Park Boulevard and Ramona Boulevard between Baldwin Park Boulevard and Downing Avenue. The Foothill Transit 178 route has a stop next to the Baldwin Park Metrolink station. It operates with 10- to 25 -minute intervals during weekday peak periods and with 20- to 60 -minute intervals on weekends. The Foothill Transit route 272 runs between Duarte and West Covina. It runs along Baldwin Park Boulevard and Ramona Boulevard between Baldwin Park Boulevard and Downing Avenue. It has a stop next to the Baldwin Park Metrolink station, and operates with 10- to 25 -minute intervals during weekday peak periods and with 20- to 60 -minute intervals on weekends. The Foothill Transit route 274 runs between the Baldwin Park Metrolink station and Whittier. It runs along Pacific Avenue and Ramona Boulevard between Maine Avenue and Downing Avenue. The route has a stop next to the Baldwin Park Metrolink station and operates with 10- to 25 -minute intervals during weekday peak periods and 20- to 60 -minute intervals on weekends. The Baldwin Park Transit Shuttle The Baldwin Park Transit shuttle is a circulator bus that provides access to various points in the City of Baldwin Park. It runs Mondays - Fridays from 6:00 am to 7:00 pm, on Saturdays from 8:00 am to 5:00 pm, and on Sundays from 9:00 am to 4:00 pm. The service is operated with approximately 27 -minute intervals on weekdays and 35 -minute intervals on weekends. There are currently two routes: the regular route and the special route, with two lines on each route (Teal Line and Pumpkin Line). The special route is identical to the regular routes except _ that it takes shortcuts on Frazier Street, Center Street and Olive Street. In the Specific Plan area, these two routes operate on exactly the same roads. The Teal line runs counter -clock wise and the Pumpkin line runs clock wise. Some major locations served on the routes within the Specific Plan area are Ramona Boulevard, the Metrolink Station, Morgan Park, and Maine Park Plaza. Existing Traffic Conditions A total of sixteen study intersections were identified, in conjunction with City of Baldwin Park staff, for inclusion in the traffic analysis. The analyzed locations correspond to locations where potential traffic impacts from the Specific Plan are most likely to occur. All of these intersections are signalized except for the intersection of Pacific Avenue and Bogart Avenue, which is minor Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.11-3 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3, Environmental Setting, Impacts and 3 11 Transportation and Traffic street stop -controlled (Stop signs on the Bogart Avenue approach). The intersections identified for analysis is as follows and shown on Figure 3.11-1: 1. Ramona Boulevard & Maine Avenue 2. Ramona Boulevard & Bogart Avenue 3. Ramona Boulevard & Downing Avenue 4. Ramona Boulevard & Badillo Street 5. Badillo Street & Puente Avenue 6. Maine Avenue & Palmrose Street 7. Maine Avenue & Clark Street 8. Maine Avenue & Los Angeles Street 9. Pacific Avenue & Bogart Avenue 10. Pacific Avenue & Downing Avenue 11. Pacific Avenue & Big Dalton Avenue 12. Ramona Boulevard & Cesar Chavez Drive 13. Ramona Boulevard & Baldwin Park Boulevard 14. Ramona Boulevard & Stewart Avenue 15. Ramona Boulevard & Merced Avenue 16. Merced Avenue & Baldwin Park Boulevard The 16 intersections selected for analysis were based on the above criteria; build out of the proposed Specific Plan's peak -hour vehicle trip generation, the anticipated distribution of vehicular trips from build out of the Specific Plan, and existing intersection/corridor operations,. In addition to intersection analysis, a review was conducted of Los Angeles County MTA intersection and freeway monitoring stations to determine if a CMP transportation impact assessment analysis is required to evaluate build out of the proposed Specific Plan. Level of Service Analysis Methodologies Traffic flow conditions are measured in terms of a grading system called LOS, which qualitatively characterizes traffic conditions associated with varying levels of vehicle traffic, ranging from LOS A (indicating excellent operating conditions with little delay to motorists) to LOS F (indicating congested conditions with excessive vehicle delay). The City of Baldwin Park has established threshold criteria that determine if a project has a significant impact at signalized intersections. Under the City's guidelines, a project impact would be considered significant if the LOS for an intersection is LOS F and the project related increase in the V/C ratio is equal to or greater than 0.010. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.11-4 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 o r us w C o red c2 Cj w L i c � m EL LL U �U N � 8 3 Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation ® — ------ 3 11 Transportation and Traffic Intersections The analysis of peak -hour intersection LOS is the primary indicator of circulation system performance. For this analysis, LOS at signalized intersections is based on the ICU methodology (the City's standard methodology), which provides an output value that represents a volume -to - capacity (V/C) ratio. For the unsignalized (side -street stop -controlled) study intersections, LOS was evaluated using methodologies from the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board, 2000). For this methodology, LOS is related to the total delay per vehicle for each stop -controlled movement or approach only (for side -street stop -controlled intersections), and the movement or approach with the highest delay is reported. Table 3.11-1 summarizes the relationship between LOS and V/C ratios (signalized) and vehicle delay (unsignalized). Existing Traffic Operating Conditions Intersections Manual counts of vehicular turning movements were conducted at the 16 study intersections during the weekday morning (7:00 am to 9:00 pm) and afternoon (4:00 pm to 6:00 pm) commuter periods in October 2014 to determine the peak -hour traffic volumes. The am peak hour in the area is generally between 7:15 am and 8:15 am, and the pm peak hour is generally between 5:00 pm and 6:00 pm. The existing am and pm peak -hour traffic volumes of vehicle movements at the study intersections are summarized in the technical appendices of the Traffic Study (The Mobility Group, 2015), in Appendix D. TABLE 3.11-1 DEFINITIONS FOR INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE �m kin t ta�llxmd Intersections LevelS1 moderate delays. nalized Intersections Average Total of Volume -to - >0.80 and <_0.90 Fair: Delays may be substantial during Description Vehicle Delay Service Capacity Description (Seconds) Grade (V/C) Ratio backups. No delay for stop- <_10.0 A <_0.60 Ex'celle; : No vehicle waits longer than one controlled approaches. Red light, and no approach phase is fully used. Operations with minor >10.0 and <_15.0 B >0.60 and <_0.70 YqU Gonad: An occasional approach phase is delay. fully utilized; many drivers begin to feel somewhat restricted within groups of vehicles. Operations with >15.0 and <_25.0 C >0.70 and <_0.80 Good: Occasionally, drivers may have to wait moderate delays. through more than one Red light; backups may develop behind turning vehicles. Operations with >25.0 and _<35.0 D >0.80 and <_0.90 Fair: Delays may be substantial during increasingly portions of the rush hours, but enough lower - unacceptable delays. volume periods occur to permit clearing of developing queues, preventing excessive backups. Operations with high >35.0 and <_50.0 delays, and long queues. E >0.90 and <_1.00 Poor: Represents the most vehicles that intersection approaches can accommodate; can have long lines of waiting vehicles through several signal cycles. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.11-6 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 SOURCES: Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual, updated 2000; Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Circular No. 212, Interim Materials on Highway Capacity, 1980. As indicated in Table 3.11-2, all of the 16 existing study intersections are currently operating at LOS E or better during the weekday am and pm peak hours, which is within the City's LOS standard. The existing conditions ICU/HCM data worksheets (for all analysis scenarios) are presented in the appendices of the Traffic Study (The Mobility Group, 2015), in Appendix D. TABLE 3.11-2 EXISTING CONDITIONS - INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Chapter 3: Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation ... ��n�n�, .... ..... ....... ......... „�m,.,, F.,. 3.11 Transportation and Traffic Operations with >50.0 F >1.00 1 g e: Backups from nearby intersections or extreme congestion, on cross streets may restrict or prevent and with very high movements of vehicles out of the intersection delays and long approaches. Lengthy delays with queues unacceptable continuously increasing queue lengths, to most drivers. B SOURCES: Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual, updated 2000; Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Circular No. 212, Interim Materials on Highway Capacity, 1980. As indicated in Table 3.11-2, all of the 16 existing study intersections are currently operating at LOS E or better during the weekday am and pm peak hours, which is within the City's LOS standard. The existing conditions ICU/HCM data worksheets (for all analysis scenarios) are presented in the appendices of the Traffic Study (The Mobility Group, 2015), in Appendix D. TABLE 3.11-2 EXISTING CONDITIONS - INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour a This is a unsignalized intersection, with Stop sign control only on the Bogart Avenue approach, and LOS is based on average delay (seconds per vehicle). SOURCE: The Mobility Group, 2015 Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.11-7 ESA P D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 V/C or V/C or No. Intersection Delay LOS Delay LOS 1 Ramona Boulevard & Maine Avenue 0.671 B 0.853 D 2 Ramona Boulevard & Bogart Avenue 0.508 A 0.574 A 3 Ramona Boulevard & Downing Avenue 0.556 A 0.548 A 4 Ramona Boulevard & Badillo Street 0.649 B 0.574 A 5 Badillo Street & Puente Avenue 0.597 A 0.666 B 6 Maine Avenue & Palmrose Street 0.360 A 0.382 A 7 Maine Avenue & Clark Street 0.560 A 0.551 A 8 Maine Avenue & Los Angeles Street 0.662 B 0.712 C 9 Pacific Avenue & Bogart Avenue 20.4 C 36.0 E 10 Pacific Avenue & Downing Avenue 0.472 A 0.508 A 11 Pacific Avenue & Big Dalton Avenue 0.535 A 0.577 A 1-2 - Ramona- Boulevard Chavez -Drive 0.424 - A 0.539 A 13 Ramona Boulevard & Baldwin Park Boulevard 0.555 A 0.784 C 14 Ramona Boulevard & Stewart Avenue 0.561 A 0.596 A 15 Ramona Boulevard & Merced Avenue 0.648 B 0.624 B 16 Merced Avenue & Baldwin Park Boulevard 0.595 A 0.684 B a This is a unsignalized intersection, with Stop sign control only on the Bogart Avenue approach, and LOS is based on average delay (seconds per vehicle). SOURCE: The Mobility Group, 2015 Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.11-7 ESA P D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3 Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation 3.11 Transportation and Traffic 3.11.2 Regulatory Setting Los Angeles Congestion Management Program The Los Angeles Congestion Management Program (CMP) is a state -mandated program enacted by the State Legislature with the passage of Proposition 111 in 1990, administered by the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro). The purpose of the CMP is to develop a coordinated approach to managing and decreasing traffic congestion by linking the various transportation, land use, and air quality planning programs throughout the County. One required element of the CMP is a process to evaluate the transportation and traffic impacts of large projects on the regional transportation system. That process is undertaken by local agencies, project applicants, and traffic consultants through a transportation impact report usually conducted as part of the CEQA project review process. The primary goal of the CMP is to reduce traffic congestion in order to enhance the economic vitality and quality of life for all affected communities. The CMP guidelines require the evaluation of all designated CMP arterial monitoring intersections, including freeway on -ramps or off -ramps, where a project could add 50 or more trips during either the am or pm peak hour and the evaluation of mainline freeway monitoring locations where a project could add 150 or more trips, in either direction, during either the am or pm peak hour. Based upon these assessments, the CMP contains specific strategies and identifies proposed improvements to reduce traffic congestion and improve the performance of a multi -modal transportation system. Examples of strategies include increased emphasis on public transportation and rideshare programs, mitigating the impacts of new development and better coordinating land use and transportation planning decisions. 2012 Regional Transportation Plan The Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) is a long-range transportation plan that is developed and updated by SCAG every four years. As the planning authority for the six counties of Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura, as well as 189 cities, SCAG is the lead agency in facilitating the development of the RTP to provide a vision for transportation investments throughout the region. Using growth forecasts and economic trends that project out over a 20 -year period, the RTP considers the role of transportation in the broader context of economic, environmental, and quality -of -life goals for the future, identifying regional transportation strategies to address our mobility needs. The preparation of an RTP every four years by SCAG is required under federal and state regulations in order for transportation projects in the Southern California region to qualify for federal and state funding. The RTP is updated to reflect changes in trends, progress made on projects, and to adjust the growth forecast for population changes. The most recent RTP was adopted by SCAG's Regional Council in April 4, 2012, and is known as the 2012-2035 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS). Compared to previous RTPs, the 2012-2035 RTP/SCS places a greater emphasis on sustainability and integrated planning, and includes a strong commitment to reduce emissions from transportation sources to comply with California Senate Bill (SB) 375, improve public health, and meet the National Ambient Air Quality Standards as set forth by the federal Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.11-8 ESA! D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3: Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation ... ......... .......... .. 3.11 Transportation and Traffic Clean Air Act. Overall, the 2012-2035 RTP/SCS contains a regional commitment for the broad deployment of zero- and near -zero emission transportation technologies in the 2023-2035 time frame and clear steps to move toward this objective. City of Baldwin Park General Plan Adopted in 2002, the City of Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan contains policies in the Circulation Element that address transportation issues relevant to the proposed Specific Plan. The City's intent is to promote and develop efficient and convenient travel by all appropriate modes (e.g., pedestrian, bicycle, regional and local bus transit and rail). As stated in the Circulation Element, "The goals and policies in this Element recognize the built -out character of Baldwin Park and reflect the constraints imposed by a long-established street network and freeway system, as well as relatively fixed land use patterns. However, the City's chief aim is to work creatively within these constraints to enhance all modes of transportation and to provide for safe and efficient circulation for all City residents." Vehicular Circulation Internal Traffic Circulation Goal 1.0: Provide a street and highway system in Baldwin Park that provides adequate capacity to ensure acceptable traffic flow. Policy 1.6: Continue to automate traffic signals and to develop an integrated traffic signal control system. Alternative Transportation Modes and Connectivity City of Baldwin Park Transportation Goals and Policies The City of Baldwin Park has long intended to promote and develop efficient and convenient travel by all appropriate modes (e.g., pedestrian, bicycle, regional and local bus transit, rail, etc.). As stated in the Circulation Element of the Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan, "The goals and policies in this Element recognize the built -out character of Baldwin Park and reflect the constraints imposed by a long-established street network and freeway system, as well as relatively fixed land use patterns. However, the City's chief aim is to work creatively within these constraints to enhance all modes of transportation and to provide for safe and efficient circulation for all City residents." Focus Area: Downtown/Metrolink Goal 8.0: Provide a circulation system in Downtown that supports a cohesive pedestrian district. Pursue development of a Specific Plan that clearly defines circulation improvements in the area. Policy 8.1: Utilize signal [inling progression on Ramona Boulevard to a t1t ottl age reduced speeds. Program, a green light" bandwidth" that provides for nianMlgeable speeds of through vehicles. Policy 8.2: 1 st�abltsh a tnid-block pedestrian connection between the north and south sides of R.', n.tona Boulevard with a pedestrian -act ivat edsignal. Utilize traffic calming techniques such as enhanced paving within travel lanes. ..... e......... ---...... _,,, Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.11-9 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and ........ ......... 3.11 Transportation and Traffic Policy 8.3: Consider alternative uses for the frontage streets/parking along Ramona Boulevard. These could include angle parking access from Ramona Boulevard with special back-up areas outside the through travel lanes. Policy 8.4: Improve alternative through traffic routes to make these alternatives more attractive to existing Maine Avenue traffic. Policy 8.5: Provide alternative viable access options for the land uses located along Maine Avenue (north of Ramona Boulevard) to reduce congestion in this area. Policy 8.6: Work with local Post Office officials to improve traffic operations associated with the Post Office use. Policy 8.7: Examine potential transit opportunities which could be developed to link the North Maine Avenue area with the Metrolink station. Policy 8.8: Examine potential transit opportunities which could be developed to link Downtown with the Metrolink station. Policy 8.9: Establish a pedestrian linkage between the Metrolink station and Downtown. 3.11.3 Thresholds of Significance In accordance with Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, the project could have a significant impact on land use and planning if it would: • Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance, or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit. • Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways. • Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks. • Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment). • Result in inadequate emergency access. • Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. The City of Baldwin Park has established threshold criteria that determine if a project has a significant impact at signalized intersections. Under the City's guidelines, a project impact would be considered significant if the LOS for an intersection is LOS F and the project related increase in the V/C ratio is equal to or greater than 0.010. .. ... ..., � Baldwin P.,. .. ark TOD Specific Plan Project 3.11-10 ESA t D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 Chapter 3: Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation .. ., 3.11 Transportation and Traffic As discussed in the Initial Study/NOP prepared for the proposed project (see Appendix A), the proposed Specific Plan area is not located within two miles of an airport nor is it located within an airport approach zone. The closest airport is El Monte Airport, located approximately four miles west of Baldwin Park. Thus, the proposed Specific Plan would not result in changes to air traffic patterns or a change in air traffic locations. In addition, the proposed Specific Plan is based on the encouragement of TOD and provision of alternative transportation. Therefore, the proposed Specific Plan area would support alternative transportation, and would be consistent with and further adopted policies, plans, and programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks). Thus, no impacts would occur 3.11.4 Methodology Traffic Forecasting In order to evaluate the potential traffic impacts of the proposed project for future conditions, it was necessary to first estimate and analyze future traffic conditions without the project. The year selected for this analysis was 2035, which is the anticipated Specific Plan build out year. Because of the long-term horizon for the proposed Specific Plan, future traffic forecasts were estimated primarily based on regional traffic forecasts, which assure consistency with the regional planning process. The traffic growth forecast was taken from the Los Angeles CMP, which projects an average 0.4 percent annual traffic growth through 2035 (i.e., a nine percent growth in traffic to the year 2035) for the part of Los Angeles County in which Baldwin Park is located. Existing traffic volumes were increased by this growth factor to obtain background 2035 traffic forecasts in the traffic study area. In general, these forecasts include all projected land use growth and transportation improvements in the region to 2035. However, there are specific currently known development projects planned in the local Baldwin Park area that would affect local traffic volumes. The list of 18 applicable proposed development projects (i.e., that could affect traffic conditions in the project area and are identified as related projects) that are in construction, approved, or under formal planning consideration in the cities of Baldwin Park, Irwindale, El Monte, and West Covina, and unincorporated areas of Los Angeles County is in Table 2-6 (and shown in Figure 2-11) of Section 2.0, Project Description. Those projects would generate a total of about 2,670 vehicle trips in the am peak hour and 5,542 vehicle trips in the pm peak hour. While the traffic from these related projects could be considered to be included in the regional traffic forecasts, in order to prepare a conservative analysis and take into account the specific effects of the related projects on the local roadway system, they were included in addition to the background (non -project -specific) growth in traffic. Future Transportation System Improvements The only transportation system improvement in the local area that is approved and fully funded to occur prior to the completion year of the Specific Plan is the installation of a new traffic signal at the intersection of Pacific Avenue and Bogart Avenue. This improvement was assumed in the base transportation network for future year analyses. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.11-11 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Im___ 3.11 Transportation and Traffic It should also be noted that, for purposes of preparing a conservative worst case analysis, no potential street improvements or transportation mitigation measures that might be associated with any of the related projects were included in the future conditions traffic analysis. 3.11.5 Impact Analysis The proposed Specific Plan is intended to provide opportunities for effective and convenient transit, pedestrian, and bicycle circulation, in addition to vehicular use. The proposed Specific Plan identifies improvements along Ramona Boulevard in Downtown that would reconfigure public right-of-way areas containing diagonal parking (the parking bays). One row of diagonal parking (closest to the street) would be removed, and the sidewalks widened. The row of diagonal parking adjacent to the buildings would be retained. This would create a wider and generous landscaped pedestrian way adjacent to the buildings while retaining convenient parking located next to the commercial land uses.2 The roadway classifications, number of traffic lanes and the roadway lane configurations of streets would remain the same as today, with the following two exceptions. • The section of Maine Avenue between Pacific Avenue and Sterling Way (opposite City Hall), would be vacated. Sterling Way would be realigned eastward at Ramona Boulevard from the current unsignalized tee -intersection to a four way signalized intersection with Cesar Chavez Drive. (The existing intersection of Ramona Boulevard & Cesar Chavez Drive is already signalized). These circulation improvements are shown in Figure 2-8 in Section 2.0, Project Description. Access to all existing properties in the area would be maintained, including the provision of a new street to run at the rear of the commercial uses fronting on Ramona Boulevard between Maine Avenue and Sterling Way in order to maintain local access and deliveries. These changes would enhance pedestrian circulation in this area and simplify the currently complicated "double" intersection of Sterling Way and Cesar Chavez Drive into a single consolidated intersection. Transit Metrolink service would continue to operate service through the Specific Plan area, with the Metrolink Station in operation at its current location. Regional bus transit routes would continue to serve the Specific Plan area, as well as serving the Metrolink Station directly. The Specific Plan would encourage and enhance accessibility to local and regional public transportation by improving connectivity to the Baldwin Park Metrolink Station and other public transit providers, and adding pedestrian and transit amenities. 2 About 150 parking spaces would be removed from Ramona Boulevard. As explained in the Specific Plan these would be accommodated elsewhere in the Specific Plan Area. The Specific Plan also identifies a potential new parking structure on Laurens Avenue. A structure of approximately 250 spaces was assumed at this location for analysis purposes, and it was assumed the removed Ramona spaces would be accommodated in the new structure. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.11-12 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 Chapter 3: Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation ......... ......... .. ......... 3.11 Transportation and Traffic Bicycles The Specific Plan Bicycle Network shown in Figure 2-10 in Section 2.0, Project Description, includes a combination of Class II and Class III facilities to provide a connected and integrated bicycle network in the Downtown, and to connect Downtown to the adjacent neighborhoods.3 The Specific Plan identities Class II facilities where feasible; however, where there is insufficient roadway width to stripe bicycle lanes and to retain on -street parking, a connected network is achieved through the designation of Class III bicycle routes. The General Plan calls for Class II bicycle lanes on Ramona Boulevard and Baldwin Park Boulevard north of Ramona Boulevard, and Class III bicycle routes on Baldwin Park Boulevard south of Ramona Boulevard, Sterling Way, and Pacific Avenue. These are all retained in the proposed Specific Plan. The existing bike lane on Ramona Boulevard would be maintained and improved. The roadway would be restriped to retain the exiting two traffic lanes in each direction, but would be reconfigured to provide a wider bicycle lane (six feet compared to the existing four -foot -wide lanes), the bicycle lane would have colored pavement to provide greater visibility, and a six -foot - wide striped separation to the moving traffic lanes would be added. Bicycle routes would be established on the following streets in the Specific Plan area: Baldwin Park Boulevard south of Ramona Boulevard, Sterling Way, and Pacific Avenue south of Maine Avenue (all as specified in the General Plan), as well as on Maine Avenue, Bogart Avenue, Downing Avenue south of Ramona Boulevard, and Central Avenue. The provision of these bicycle facilities would not reduce the number of traffic lanes on any roadways. Project Trip Generation and Distribution For the purposes of this EIR traffic analysis, land use forecasts were developed for the proposed Specific Plan. These comprised land use types and quantities that could be added in the Specific Plan area, and land use types and quantities that could be replaced (removed). A total of 20 geographic zones were identified and land use projections made for each zone. Potential changes in land uses were identified for 15 of these zones. The land use forecasts are summarized in Table 4.1 of the Traffic Study in Appendix D, by type of land use, and for the Specific Plan area as a whole. In total, the Specific Plan could accommodate approximately an additional 289,150 square feet of commercial development and an additional 848 multi -family dwelling units. A total of 68,200 square feet of commercial and industrial uses could be removed in the Specific Plan area (including almost 24,000 square feet of manufacturing uses) as well as 17 single-family residential units. 3 A Class II bicyclelane consists of a designated striped lane along the curb lane of a street or highway. The lane provides for one-way travel and is generally delineated with special striping and signage. A Class III bicycle route is for shared use with pedestrians or more commonly motor vehicle traffic. Signs are posted which indicate that the road also serves as a bike route. While no special striping is provided for cyclists, there may be "sharrow" markings (representation of a bicycle) on the roadway to emphasize the shared use of the roadway lane. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.11-13 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and M 3 11 Transportation and Traffic Vehicular trip generation was estimated for the existing land uses and for the projected future land uses, to determine a net increase in trip generation. Trip generation from the project was estimated using trip rates from Trip Generation Manual (Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2012). However, ITE trip rates are for stand-alone land uses with negligible transit use. Therefore, the rates were adjusted to be more representative of a local downtown environment and transit oriented district — where the proximity of land uses allows for some trips to be made by walking rather than driving, where some of the trips are between destinations within the downtown and thus do not leave the area, and where proximity to transit allows other trips to be made by transit. Internal Trip Reduction (Trips Remaining within the Specific Plan Boundary) Due to the mixed-use nature of the Specific Plan land uses and the pedestrian -friendly small - block grid system layout, there would be interaction among the different land uses in the Specific Plan. For example, residents or employees living and/or working within the plan boundaries who visit a nearby retail or restaurant use would generally be within walking distance, and would not need to make a vehicle trip. Similarly, some visitors to Downtown would visit several destinations and would not make separate driving trips to each use, but would typically walk between nearby destinations. Transit Trips Because the Specific Plan location is mostly in a traditional downtown grid combined with a host of land uses within walking distance from the Metrolink station and with some bus transit readily available, a number of project trips are expected to be made by transit rather than private vehicle. Adjustments Certain adjustments to the trip generation rates were therefore made to reflect the above conditions. These adjustments differed for existing and future conditions. Today, the land uses are lower density, and the Downtown area is not very pedestrian -friendly, with a negligible amount of bicycling. In the future, with the Specific Plan, land uses would be higher density — encouraging more walking between uses, and the pedestrian- and bicycle -oriented features of the Specific Plan would create a more pedestrian -friendly environment. In combination with the improved walking environment, the improved access to the Metrolink Station would encourage higher transit use. The location and combination of land uses in each zone was evaluated to estimate reasonable estimates of the proportion of trips internal to the Specific Plan area and that would be made by walking, and of mode shares for transit. For existing conditions, trip rate reductions of 5 percent for commercial uses, 10 percent for residential uses, and 20 percent for convenience uses such as banks and fast food were applied for internal and walking trips, and a reduction of 2 percent for transit use. For future projections with the Specific Plan, trip rate reductions of between 10 and 20 percent were made for internal and walking trips, and between 5 and 10 percent for future transit use. The trip rates and adjustments used are shown in Appendix A of the Traffic Study in Appendix D. These adjustments are based on consideration of local and national research and are Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.11-14 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2016 Chapter 3: Environmental Setting Impacts and Mitigation -.... 3.11 Transportation and Traffic considered to be conservative adjustments (in order to not underestimate potential project impacts). Specific Plan Trip Generation Totals As shown in Table 3.11-3, the build out of the proposed Specific Plan would generate a net total of 332 new vehicle trips in the am peak hour (from 1,611 to 1,943 trips) and 1,084 new vehicle trips in the pm peak hour (from 2,472 to 3,556 trips). TABLE 3.11-3 TRIP GENERATION BY LAND USE SOURCE: The Mobility Group, 2015 Specific Plan Trip Distribution The likely distribution of the project trips was identified based on the type of land uses in the Specific Plan, the likely origins and destinations of project residents and visitors, and the characteristics of the street system in the Specific Plan area. The distribution estimates were based largely on trip distribution information in the Los Angeles CMP for the area of Baldwin Park (which are based on the distribution of population and employment in the broader region), as well as consideration of the more localized areas adjacent to the Specific Plan area. The distribution of peak -hour vehicle trips from the Specific Plan Area is illustrated in Figure 4.2 (non-residential trips) and in Figure 4.3 (residential trips), in the Traffic Study in Appendix D. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.11-15 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 Existing _.- .- ...... Future ......, Change et ..._-.. ,...... Land Use AM PM Daily AM PM Daily AM PM Daily Residential -Apartments 19 23 246 355 425 4,187 336 402 3,941 Single Family Houses 39 52 495 27 36 346 -12 -16 -149 Public Facility 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Community Center 113 151 1,866 113 151 1,866 0 0 0 Communication Facilities 35 37 265 35 37 265 0 0 0 Industrial 30 32 229 37 39 278 7 7 49 Manufacturing 17 17 89 0 0 0 -17 -17 -89 Medical Office 25 38 379 0 0 0 -25 -38 -379 Auto Repair 35 43 429 0 0 0 -35 -43 -429 Office 72 68 508 95 90 675 23 22 167 Government Office 455 93 5,333 302 62 3,544 -153 -31 -1,789 Retail/Commercial 724 1,849 21,797 770 2,389 26,963 46 540 5,166 Restaurant 47 69 914 209 327 4,077 162 258 3,163 Total 1,611 2475 32730 1,943 3,556 -3'466 332 1,084 ���. 61 ..__1 Residential � 58�� ���� ...72 ��� 4,533 324 388���� 3,792 Non -Residential 1,553 2,397 31,809 1,561 3,095 37,668 8 698 5,859 SOURCE: The Mobility Group, 2015 Specific Plan Trip Distribution The likely distribution of the project trips was identified based on the type of land uses in the Specific Plan, the likely origins and destinations of project residents and visitors, and the characteristics of the street system in the Specific Plan area. The distribution estimates were based largely on trip distribution information in the Los Angeles CMP for the area of Baldwin Park (which are based on the distribution of population and employment in the broader region), as well as consideration of the more localized areas adjacent to the Specific Plan area. The distribution of peak -hour vehicle trips from the Specific Plan Area is illustrated in Figure 4.2 (non-residential trips) and in Figure 4.3 (residential trips), in the Traffic Study in Appendix D. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.11-15 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3, Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation 3.11 Transportation and Trak Impact 3.11.1: The proposed project could conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance, or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, or could conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways. Existing Plus Project Intersection Levels of Service As described above, the City of Baldwin Park has established threshold criteria that determine if a project has a significant impact at signalized intersections. Under the City's guidelines, a project impact would be considered significant if the LOS for an intersection is LOS F and the project related increase in the V/C ratio is equal to or greater than 0.010. As shown in Table 3.11-4, the analysis indicates that the addition of Specific Plan build out traffic would cause the level of service to worsen at a number of locations, but remain at an acceptable LOS at all except at the intersections of Ramona Boulevard and Maine Avenue, and Pacific Avenue and Bogart Avenue where LOS F would occur during the pm peak hour. The level of service at the unsignalized intersection of Pacific Avenue and Bogart Avenue would change from LOS E to LOS F. The City does not have criteria for significant impacts at unsignalized intersections. However, the City would install a new traffic signal at this location, which has been previously planned for, which would result in LOS A conditions. The level of service at the signalized intersection of Ramona Boulevard and Maine Avenue would change from LOS D to LOS F, which is considered a significant impact. However, implementation of Mitigation Measures TRAF-1 would implement street improvements within the existing right-of-way that would reduce impacts related to the Existing Plus Project condition to a less than significant level. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.11-16 ESA f D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2016 to u? 0 Cl. < CIS 2M m 0 - - ----- 2, U 6 C 0 (a cj co co ca m m �m In In m US m m m co co w m w c c: r co c6 -rg . ...... .. . . . . ... . . ............ to co 0 m -T M @ m @ M, r- c: c c c. m co ca CL (D > tm (D . . ................ r w'4 a -F tm L = .0 R (a fly mmmcam@m@@m@@@d `i! cql, -d -a! Z! -i! I! -e: 'c ra@ca@@@ @@@@@ @m@@@ m n................ Z UJ p CD . (D m U) C).r_ O0 0 0 o U) o o a o C) o o o C) o o lo o 0 0 o o o o o o o 0 a o Lu L) m CL. z uj z 7-1 z z z z z z z z z z �z z Z Z� Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z L) Lu U)S E 5: . .......... . ... . .. -11 ....... . — ------ . ............ . . . . . . ........... ............. o LU 0 U) >. 8 cm co (D �1) �co r- "I cl) c, u,� Lq N In N m 0 (0 IT co M LD 0 co 1- m OO IN m LLQ 0 _j uj L) 0) - . N In 6 oopl_qqqqo0lq , . o cD . . o cS c; 9 cS (D . �q 0 cD 0 LO (0 q, o cD Cl o 0 (D a d) 'a Cl) a _j L) (D m 2 LLJLU . .......... .. . . . . ........... . . . . ...... — ----- - (D > 0 co Lu U) 0 C) LL < < < < < < c) C) is- < < < CO M L) < W < M M M Mi C) a o LU IDD ti > 0 < d) F 14) 0 0 Z c,4 r- N u� c) P 0 U) 1� csj u� u� M tr (q ODM cli co aj `4: IQ U) u� (Do 00 P� n m , T . o� U� til �o (D IR (Q c"I A w LLI ci_oo d(o 6060c)000000 _j . . .... . ...... . .... . . . . .... . ...... fLU)0 U) 0 < < < m < < ca < < mi 0 C), w < i< < < < < 13 P ........... . . . . . ..... . 'w . . . ..................... . "tOD ai co m w Lr) cD Go LO k m -'T Lo -(Do04 Lo(D cl) M, 0 V) U) cq 04 (D 1- o 0 Noo Lr) 0 u) m 10 Ln IQ r_� u� (q a) 'A� (q w 6 6 6^. 6 6 (5 6 c; 6 6 c; 6 6 6 c; 6 IN m 6 6 6 0 c=; 0 0 c) o o 0 0 6 • a. L) 0_<a_<CL< <(L 'x222 (L < m >< 0 LU LL C) LU o 6 > a) 0 > > 75 o (D n c: =3 c: (1) >a) co :3 c: =3 c W o co (L) ca a_ i5 cu U) (D m W a) o m < 0 U) c < 1- mo) -Fa (L) ca o -R P -2 -a- (=D fED IC o O o ED 0 co -2 co -2 P ca co _P cu m (D > a) -3 m > 2 ca > cc > a - - - _j - - a) , - (D , - a) :3 > .2 =3 > > .2 A M = > .2 = =) c: _R G -D L Ey C 0 0 co 0 0 w =3 o ca =3 0 m a) 2 :3 c a) :3 c (D a) c: c: c: o ED o o o a) a) _?�, ca co, ca m 65 - r_ ca c: -a nL Fq O E 0 E o E o E .2 w L) o E o o E o E a) 2 P) a) M 0 QY ca w ca cu m 2 2 w CL m CL co cu co ca (a Q) 2 E . . ...... . . ............. m WM) C) 6 04 CO I- Wm o �2 L2 Q� D 0 LF" v Chapter 3: Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation ........ ......... 3.11 Transportation and Traffic Future Intersection Levels of Service As shown in Table 3.11-5, all intersections in the traffic study area would operate at LOS D or better during the am and pm peak hours under Future (2035), with exception of the intersections of Ramona Boulevard and Maine Avenue, and Ramona Boulevard and Baldwin Park Boulevard where LOS F would occur during the pm peak hour, and the increase in v/c ratio would exceed the City's threshold of significance of 0.010. To reduce these impacts Mitigation Measures TRAF-1 through TRAF-3 would be implemented. As shown in Table 3.11-5, implementation of these mitigation measures would result in a v/c ratio of 0.981 (LOS E) at the intersection of Ramona Boulevard and Maine Avenue, and a v/c ratio of 0.969 (LOS E), which would reduce the potentially significant impacts to a less than significant level. As detailed below, Mitigation Measures TRAF-1 and TRAF-3 would implement street improvements within the existing Ramona Boulevard right-of-way that would reconfigure the approaches to the intersections of Ramona Boulevard and Maine Avenue, and Ramona Boulevard and Baldwin Park Boulevard, which would preclude the ability to provide wider bike lanes adjacent to the vehicular turn lane. This would have no impact on bicycle travel or safety. It is an accepted and common occurrence for bicycle lanes to transition to a shared lane on major intersection approaches. Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measure TRAF-1: Intersection No. 1: Ramona Boulevard and Maine Avenue. Restripe the eastbound and westbound approaches on Ramona Boulevard to add dedicated right -turn lanes within the existing curb -to -curb width of the roadway; all other lane configurations at the intersection would remain unchanged. This reconfiguration of the Ramona Boulevard approaches to the intersection would preclude the ability to provide wider bike lanes adjacent to the vehicular turn lane. Mitigation Measure TRAF-2: Intersection No. 1: Convert Maine Avenue between Pacific Avenue and Sterling Way to a one-way (westbound) only roadway. This shall be achieved by the relocating of Maine Avenue to be located along the rear of the commercial uses fronting on Ramona Boulevard between Pacific Avenue and Sterling Way. Mitigation Measure TRAF-3: Intersection No. 13: Ramona Boulevard and Baldwin Park Boulevard. Restripe the eastbound and westbound approaches on Ramona Boulevard to add dedicated right -turn lanes within the existing curb -to -curb width of the roadway; all other lane configurations at the intersection would remain unchanged. This reconfiguration of the Ramona Boulevard approaches to the intersection would preclude the ability to provide wider bike lanes adjacent to the vehicular turn lane. Significance After Mitigation: Less than significant Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.11-18 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 m c E c w M N• I d 116 I I i 1 I I 1 I l I k 1 1 I I I I I I Iw II I I I I E N N C O W m L"+1,. hm. m m m A[1 m A1S m m ,4'4,8 441 m m m m ,.4'fl.. m m f9A m m R'P' m O m hit m m m m mrU m `cam'c`c c2 c i 22c`cc c c' :2 c` c c c�222 c`c2 r U) Co m m m m m (a m m m m m m 2l7 m 841 m m 845 m A'49 m m m m m Cq� m m 1n y 2w cc cc2'c c" 2. `cc'c' .4 2..c' `c "?�cc'c� `c C.. r- cc coN N m «_ Z mr �� eaorzm rtia mca4aaA ear m 45 1,ramme6Mggge-3gv�roeame6ro�a U a7 2 O> 2 2 2. c c c c. 2 c o 0._c c c c 2 2 2 c iG O 2 C c c C c w N >p c m O.to � � a __.. w LU Cy Oy)y 00000000000 0 0 00000C)oC)omoo 000 U rnQ Z>,„'. ZZZZZZZZ� ZZZZ'' ZZ ZZZZZZ>„" ZZZZZ LU <n E w U) - (n ? O LL 2 0 a) C A 0.O Co 0.O M N M k13 O co c4) `^�' co�N9^�-M1- N 0.67 �"� O)Oto to 8� co m Mr- oNtONMON N NON 8NM NA uMln lO M 0.+1 M C0 —i CU N vN 04°:78=>Ci (." ggC0 q a, o.q .00000(" c4O-0006"')t�70 W w Lip 000c:��:tir��ao00r1iooa�00000000es000000cwrao p U LU J odQidmmm arLLmmOUm® m 0 pLLQmmmUG�C[iU m J ...,.. ..m, .. ...__ ._.............. Y m 3 t �" N T'7 4C) d N t" • 1:"JN Cis W" 0 Cis KS.1 "�" N (O N 6'77 N m N. M w 0 oiQo a)LL.+ O m (Di'T? aX7N C"7w"q`6--4Y7 NN.(QwMcooCCsN:..U)InONc4JN ro r> w O V m co ca Tk 0 �q {7 • o m A c) (a7 (D p " 4r sn sn IQ(o (q 4q co 0 0 sD r� ti (q cq wa^ jp o s aC o¢ rc oo ao sooc ooo C:; crr n U I—❑� N - y UOddQddmQdQpmmUmraU QH c d � Uwdm Q h mm�o¢t v C) O V N M I47 U N C9 W O N �" (V..O..N 017 00 �€7 (D 7 7a 000 ...,08".50.")�.:d 0 0'r, O q� I`-8? (D LOOM 0.L3 ` T N 4i1 4."> O __ Qi LL a) O h-�M0.67 M"`5 OM(D CCb CO."SOOtl°OOOM i d ti (,47 1,61, (O M to Ih 4.0 (� M "ck 6(7 (D 1` t` u.Q"k 1.(7 C() 4 GD 00 to (D 1-� (D (O f® M V >p oraa�ocaoorco�>o ."re.ioc500000 Va iRQat dada adrL n Qa�aa d_d[a dadO.Q a<a,m �O LL w U- 0 Oca >- J > m WOv m m m C C > j•7 N m 7 , C > ca > > m a) > Q a) N a)m C4 7 C > L d Q Q Y C N > Q U C N 'ON d -t C7 U) a) Q C N O o Q N N OI d c O N ca C m D9 a) O ¢ m C -o a -o aa) m o D o m a -0 a -2 m ca ca a d U 1 m Q m > > > > (V (D a>i a>i a) a) m () a) a> m m 2 ar 5 O O O C C c C C c O O O O a) ED m m �cN > > > > > > m m m m Q cr m m m m 65d Q Q d d d o0o. c . c O O O O C C C 4-" 4= 4= O O O O U (cu (Ea m m (moo m E E E E m m m m m m m m m m cc a) G Z,-•^ N M V 1D (D rn r M 3, Environmental Setting, Impacts and ......... 3,11 Transportation and Traffic Congestion Management Program Traffic Impact Assessment As described above, the CMP requires analysis of traffic conditions at all CMP arterial monitoring intersections where the proposed Specific Plan would add 50 or more trips during either the am or pm weekday peak hours of adjacent street traffic. The CMP also requires that traffic studies analyze mainline freeway monitoring locations where the project will add 150 or more trips in either direction during either am or pm weekday peak hours. If, based on these criteria, the Traffic Study identifies no facilities for study, then no further traffic analysis is required. CMP Arterial Monitoring Locations A review of the 2010 CMP shows that the following arterial monitoring stations are closest to the Specific Plan area and where CMP impacts could potentially occur from build out of the project: • Azusa Avenue & Foothill Boulevard • Azusa Avenue & Arrow Highway • Azusa Avenue & Cameron Avenue • Azusa Avenue & Amar Road The number of Specific Plan vehicle trips expected to pass through these intersections at build out was estimated based on the trip generation and trip distribution described above. Due to dispersal of Specific Plan traffic onto multiple routes and streets as it travels farther from the area, the number of trips are fewer than the 50 -trip threshold by the time project traffic reaches the monitoring intersections. The maximum number of trips that the Specific Plan at build out would add to these CMP arterial monitoring stations would be in the pm peak hour; and would be 22 trips at Azusa Avenue & Foothill Boulevard, 33 trips at Azusa Avenue & Arrow Highway, 43 trips at Azusa Avenue & Cameron Avenue, and 33 trips at Azusa Avenue & Amar Road. As the threshold of 50 or more trips would not be exceeded, no further analysis is required, and impacts related to CMP arterials would be less than significant. CMP Freeway Monitoring Stations A review of the 2010 CMP also shows that the following freeway monitoring stations are closest to the Specific Plan area: • I-10 east of Peck Road • I-10 east of Puente Street • I-10 at Grand Avenue • 1-210 west of I-605 • 1-605 at San Gabriel River Bridge These segments are located some considerable distance from the Specific Plan area. The maximum number of one-way Specific Plan trips that would be added to these freeway segment monitoring locations would be in the pm peak hour, with 55 trips on I-10 east of Peck Road, 50 trips on I-10 at Grand Avenue, 30 trips on I-210 west of 1-605, and zero trips on I-10 east of .. - ,,,, ------- ------- Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.11-20 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 Chapter 3: Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation ....... — 3.11 Transportation and Traffic Puente Avenue and on I-605 at San Gabriel River Bridge. As these volumes are well below the CMP threshold of 150 trips, no further analysis is necessary, and impacts to CMP freeways would be less than significant. Transit Impact Analysis The Specific Plan would generate about 186 net additional transit trips (101 inbound trips and 85 outbound trips) in the am peak hour, and about 365 additional transit trips (184 inbound and 181 outbound) in the pm peak hour (as detailed in the Traffic Study, Appendix D). Based on the existing service frequency of transit lines near the Specific Plan area, the hourly directional capacity of the transit lines is 2,151 persons (see Table 4.6 of the Traffic Study). The highest directional volume of peak -hour trips added by the Specific Plan (184 trips in the pm peak hour), which would be about 8.5 percent of the total hourly directional transit capacity, which would not cause the capacity of the transit system to be substantially exceeded. Therefore, the proposed Specific Plan would not create any significant impacts on the transit systems serving the Specific Plan area. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation required Significance Determination: Less than significant Impact 3.11.2: The proposed project could substantially increase hazards due to a design feature. The proposed Specific Plan would redesign some intersections to slow traffic speed, thereby increasing pedestrian and vehicle safety. All development within the Specific Plan would be required to be consistent with City street, sidewalk and public place design standards (outlined in Chapter 97 of the City Municipal Code). As a result, implementation of the proposed Specific Plan would result in less -than -significant impacts associated with potential traffic safety design hazards. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation required Significance Determination: Less than significant Impact 3.11.3: The proposed project could result in inadequate emergency access. The proposed Specific Plan would involve the reconfiguration of roadways and driveways to commercial properties. All such reconfigurations would be required to allow adequate emergency access per City requirements, requiring construction permits from the City's Public Works Department. Therefore, there is a reasonable expectation that development activities would not be allowed to result in potential impacts related to emergency access, as all projects are required to Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.11-21 ESA i D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting. Impacts and M 3.11 Transportation and Traffic go through development review and approval with the City Planning Department and Fire Department. For those reasons, implementation of the proposed Specific Plan would result in less -than -significant impacts associated with provision of adequate emergency access. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation required Significance Determination: Less than significant Baldwin Park, City of, City of Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan, adopted November 2002. ITE (Institute of Transportation Engineers), Trip Generation (9th edition), 2012. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), 2010 Congestion Management Program for Los Angeles County, October 2010. Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual, updated 2000. Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Circular No. 212, Interim Materials on Highway Capacity, 1980. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.11-22 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3.12 Utilities and Service Systems Introduction The purpose of this section is to assess the potential impacts of build out of the proposed Specific Plan on water supply and service, wastewater collection and treatment, storm water drain systems and solid waste disposal capacity. This section is based on comparisons of existing and anticipated levels of service with build out of the proposed Specific Plan. Infrastructure capacity information is sourced from the Baseline Infrastructure Study (Cruikshank, 2014), and information related to water supplies and service is from the Valley County Water District 2010 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) (Civiltec, 2011). 3.12.1 Environmental Setting Water Infrastructure The Specific Plan area is located entirely within the 9.4 square mile service area of the Valley County Water District (VCWD). VCWD's water distribution system consists of four active wells, 17 booster pumps at six plants, six steel reservoirs that provide 10 million gallons of storage, approximately 120 miles of transmission and distribution piping, and a connection to the regional Metropolitan Water District (MWD) facilities (VCWD, 2013). The existing water lines within the Specific Plan area consist of mostly steel pipes and a few polyvinyl chloride (PVC) water lines, which range in size from four to 12 -inches in diameter (Cruikshank, 2014). The existing water supply infrastructure within the Specific Plan area is described below and shown on Figure 3.12-1. La Rica Avenue: An eight -inch water main exists on the west side of La Rica Avenue from north of the Specific Plan area's north boundary that extends south and terminates at the connection to the existing water line in the westbound lane of Ramona Boulevard. Baldwin Park Boulevard: A 20 -inch water main is located within Baldwin Park Boulevard from the Specific Plan area's north boundary to the westbound lane of Ramona Boulevard. There is also a six-inch water line within Baldwin Park Boulevard west of the 20 -inch water main from Clark Street to the westbound lane of Ramona Boulevard. Maine Avenue: A 12 -inch water main exists within the west side of Main Avenue, from north of the Specific Plan's north boundary that extends south to terminate at the connection to the existing 12 -inch main in the west bound lane of Ramona Boulevard. There is also an eight -inch line in the east side of Main Avenue, from north of the Specific Plan area's north boundary that extends south to terminate at the connection to the existing 12 -inch line from the east bound lane of Ramona Boulevard to Pacific Avenue. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.12-1 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2016 4{ O O N Y 3 c �E N L, as v c O m U d O m c c 0 O m T R c J 0 c "v m E m m ro Y C_ O Y d T- M v rn N � Mr Q N ,+ LL (D _ w 3a � � U o d U U U Q a U) U O (n E 3 � O t c 0 Y a c C_ U) � X m w N U uJ U O 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3.12 Utility Services Bogart Avenue: A six-inch water line is located within the west side of Bogart Avenue from the north boundary of the Specific Plan area to the west lane of Ramona Boulevard. There is another six-inch water line from the east bound lane of Ramona Boulevard to Pacific Avenue. Alderson Avenue: An eight -inch water line is located within the west side of Alderson Avenue from the Specific Plan's north boundary to Ramona Avenue. Clark Street: An eight -inch water line is located within Clark Street from the west boundary of the Specific Plan to the east boundary of the Specific Plan. Morgan Street: A six-inch water line is located within Morgan Street from Baldwin Park Avenue to Laurens Avenue. Palm Avenue: A six-inch water line is located within the north side of Palm Avenue from the west boundary of the Specific Plan to Maine Avenue. Palmrose Street: A four -inch water line is located within the north side of Palmrose Street from Baldwin Park Avenue to Bogart Avenue. Ramona Boulevard: Within the westbound lane a 12 -inch water line is located from La Rica Avenue that extends east past the east boundary of the Specific Plan; and another 12 -inch water line is located within the westbound lane of Ramona Boulevard from Baldwin Park Avenue to just south of Morgan Park. Within the eastbound lane, a 12 -inch water line is located from the Specific Plan's southwest boundary to Sterling Way. In addition, another 12 -inch line is located within Ramona Boulevard to approximately 14514 Maine Avenue where it downsizes to an 8 - inch line and continues east to Downing Avenue. Sterling Way: A 12 -inch water main is located within Sterling Way from Ramona Avenue to Maine Avenue; and another 12 -inch line from the southwest boundary of the Specific Plan to approximately 14326 Sterling Way. Pacific Avenue: A six-inch line is located within Pacific Avenue from Maine Avenue continuing past the southern boundary of the Specific Plan area. Central Avenue: A six-inch line is located within Central Avenue from Downing Avenue continuing past the southern boundary of the Specific Plan area. De La Gair Court: An eight -inch water line is located within De La Gair Court from Pacheco Drive to Lozano Drive. Pacheco Drive: An eight -inch water line is located within Pacheco Drive from De La Gair Court to Lozano Drive. Lozano Drive: An eight -inch water line is located within Lozano Drive from De La Gair Court to Pacheco Drive. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.12-3 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3 12 Utility Services Jeremie Avenue: A six-inch water line is located within Jeremie Avenue from Downing Avenue continuing past the southeast boundary of the Specific Plan area. Chevalier Avenue: A six-inch water line is located in Chevalier Avenue from Downing Avenue continuing past the southeast boundary of the Specific Plan area. Water Easement Along Park Plaza Lane: A four -inch water line is located within a water easement that extends along Park Plaza Lane from Maine Avenue to Bogart Avenue. Water Supply VCWD serves approximately 75,000 people through 12,470 delivery service connections in parts of the cities of Baldwin Park, Irwindale, West Covina and Azusa. Potable water in the City of Baldwin Park is also provided by the San Gabriel Valley Water Company and Valley View Mutual Water Company (VCWD, 2013); however, these water companies do not serve the Specific Plan area and VCWD owns and maintains the entire water supply network within the city. VCWD obtains its water supply from three sources. In 2010, about 79 percent of its water supplies came from the Main San Gabriel Groundwater Basin per wells located within its service boundaries and 19 percent came from MWD surface water. The remainder came from the Covina Irrigation Company, which generally has excess groundwater rights and a distribution system in the vicinity of VCWD (VCWD, 2011). VCWD has a long-term agreement to transfer water for County purchase to the Santa Fe Dam, and also transfers a limited amount of water to the Valley View Mutual Water Company on an emergency basis (VCWD, 2011). Table 3.12-1 provides a breakdown of the VCWD's existing and projected water supplies. TABLE 3.12-1 CURRENT AND PROJECTED VCWD WATER SUPPLY SOURCES (AFY) Water Supply Source 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 Groundwater 6,580.0 9,159 9,159 9,159 9,159 9,159 Import from MWD 1,609.2 941 941 941 941 941 Import from Covina Irrigation Company 158.1 256 256 256 256 256 Transfer to Santa Fe Dam -33.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Transfer to Valley View Municipal Water -0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Company _.....__ ....__„ ------ ........__. — Total Supply 8,313.4 10,356 10,356 10,356 10,356 10,356 SOURCE: Civiltec, 2011 From 2008 to 2010, overall water demand within the VCWD service area incrementally decreased (see Table 3.12-2 below). However, as shown in Table 3.12-3 below, water demands a.--.-. . . . . ............................ -- m.., ... __.... - ,.. ----...... M. ,Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.12-4 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures . ......... .1_, .... „�„ 3.12 Utility Services for all water use sectors within the VCWD service area are expected to increase steadily from 2015 to 2035. Single family residential uses are expected to continue to constitute the majority of water demand. TABLE 3.12-2 ACTUAL VCWD WATER DELIVERIES FROM 2008 THROUGH 2010 (AFY) Water Use Sectors.. ....... m....�. m. .-. ..m. 2008 2009 2010 Single Family Residential 3,446.5 4,434.7 4,574.7 Multi -Family Residential 855.9 1,073.2 1,065.1 Commercial 1,198.6 1,773.7 1,065.1 Industrial 200.1 259.8 254.2 Institutional and Governmental 809.0 593.4 546.6 System Losses 2,490.3 489.7 431.8 Total Deliveries 9,000.4 8,624.5 8,313.4 SOURCE: Civiltec, 2011,. TABLE 3.12-3 PROJECTED VCWD WATER DELIVERIES FROM 2015 THROUGH 2035 (AFY) Water Use Sectors 2015 2020 2025 2030 2036 Single -Family Residential 4,845 4,935 5,022 5,105 5,185 Multi -Family Residential 1,165 1,186 1,207 1,227 1,246 Commercial 1,717 1,749 1,779 1,809 1,837 Industrial 278 283 288 293 297 Institutional and Government 758 772 786 799 811 System Losses 438 446 454 462 469 - Total Deliveries__ 9,201 _ 9,372 9,536 9,695 9,846 SOURCE: Civiltec, 2011. As stated previously, the entire Specific Plan area lies within the VCWD service area. The predominant existing land uses within the Specific Plan area are commercial and vacant land. The breakdown of the existing water demand associated with the Specific Plan area land uses is provided below in Table 3.12-4. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.12_5 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3, Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures „ ..............- ... ....... ......... .,, 3 12 Utility Services . TABLE 3.12-4 EXISTING WATER DEMAND IN SPECIFIC PLAN AREA ...................... ............... ........................................................................................... ............. Consumption Specific Plan Land Use Category Factor (AFY) Acres Demand (AFY) Single Family 3.10 7.73 23..96 Residential Multi -Family Residential, Low 4.60 0.53 2.44 Density Multi -Family Residential, High 6.70 0 0 Density Commercial 1.60 50.89 81.42 Industrial and 1.40 3.83 5.36 Manufacturing Open Space, (Schools, Parks and 2.40 10.55 25.32 Churches) Total Demand 138.50 SOURCE for consumption factors: Civiltec, 2008 Wastewater Infrastructure The existing wastewater system within the Specific Plan area is owned and maintained by the City of Baldwin Park Department of Public Works, with the exception of a small portion of the 15 -inch Baldwin Park Boulevard trunk sewer that is located at the west end of the Specific Plan area boundary, and the 24 -inch Joint Outfall H Unit 8E Trunk Sewer, which is owned and maintained by the Los Angeles County Sanitation District (LACSD). The Specific Plan area is served by a network of sewer mains, which mostly consist of eight -inch Vitrified Clay Pipe (VCP) (Cruikshank, 2014). There are two major sewer trunk lines within the Specific Plan area, one is a 15 -inch pipe in Maine and Pacific Avenues, and the other is a 15 -inch pipe in Baldwin Park Boulevard. Both sewer trunks flow from north to south. According to the LACSD, the 24 -inch Joint Outfall H Unit 8E Trunk Sewer would also serve the project area (Raza, 2015). The existing sewer infrastructure within the Specific Plan area is described below and shown in Figure 3.12-1. La Rica Avenue: An eight -inch sewer line is located within the east side of La Rica Avenue from the Specific Plan boundary to Ramona Boulevard. Baldwin Park Boulevard: A 15 -inch sewer line is located within the west side of Baldwin Park Boulevard from the Specific Plan boundary to Ramona Boulevard. Maine Avenue: An eight -inch sewer line is located within the east side of Main Avenue from the northern Specific Plan boundary to Pacific Avenue. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.12-6 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report Apol 2015 3, Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures .... ........ 3.12 Utility Services Laurens Avenue: An eight -inch sewer line is located within the center line of Laurens Avenue from just south of Morgan Street to the alley north of Ramona Boulevard. Bogart Avenue: An eight -inch sewer line is located within the west bound lane of Bogart Avenue from the northern Specific Plan boundary to Ramona Boulevard. In addition, an 8 -inch VCP sewer main is located on the north side of Bogart Avenue from the Ramona Boulevard east bound lane to Pacific Avenue. Downing Avenue: A 10 -inch sewer line is located within Downing Avenue from the Specific Plan boundary to the west bound lane of Ramona Boulevard, and an 8 -inch sewer line is located in Downing Avenue from the east bound lane Ramona Boulevard to just north of Central Avenue. In addition, an 8 -inch sewer line is located on the north side of Downing Avenue from the Ramona Boulevard east bound lane to Pacific Avenue. Alderson Avenue: An eight -inch sewer line is located within the west side of Alderson Avenue from the Specific Plan boundary to the west bound lane of Ramona Boulevard. Clark Street: An eight -inch sewer line is located within the south side of Clark Street from approximately 14347 Clark Street continuing west past the Specific Plan boundary. Morgan Street: An eight -inch sewer line is located within Morgan Street from Baldwin Park Boulevard to Cricket Lane. Cricket Lane: An eight -inch sewer line is located within Cricket Lane from just south of Palm Avenue to Morgan Street. Palm Avenue: An eight -inch sewer line is located within Palm Avenue from Park Shadow Court to Cricket Lane. Park Plaza Lane: An eight -inch sewer line is located within Park Plaza Lane from Maine Avenue and extends approximately 620 feet to the east. Cesar Chavez Drive: An eight -inch sewer line is located within Cesar Chavez Drive from the westbound lane of Ramona Boulevard to Laurens Avenue. Ramona Boulevard: An eight -inch sewer line: -is located within flie west bound lane of 11aniona Boulevard from Baldwin Park Boulevard to Cesar Chavez Drive, and from Maine Avenue continuing east past the Specific Plan east boundary. Within the east bound lane of Kamona Boulevard an 8 -inch sewer line is located from west of the Specific Plan boundary continuing east to approximately 14348 Ramona Boulevard; from Maine Avenue to approximately 14436 Ramona Boulevard; and east from approximately 14514 Ramona Boulevard to Badillo Street. Sterling Way: An eight -inch sewer line is located within Sterling Way from the Specific Plan boundary to Pacific Avenue. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.12-7 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting. Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3 12 utility Services Pacific Avenue: A 15 -inch sewer line is located within Pacific Avenue from Maine Avenue to the south boundary of the Specific Plan area. Central Avenue: An eight -inch sewer line is located within Central Avenue from just south of Downing Avenue continuing past the southern boundary of the Specific Plan area. Jeremie Avenue: An eight -inch sewer line is located within Jeremie Avenue from just south of Downing Avenue continuing past the southern boundary of the Specific Plan area. Chevalier Avenue: An eight -inch sewer line is located within Chevalier Avenue from just south of Downing Avenue continuing past the southern boundary of the Specific Plan area. Wastewater Treatment Wastewater generated within the Specific Plan area is conveyed by LACSD No. 15 trunk sewer network (SJCWRP, 2015a) to the San Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant (WRP) (SJCWRP) located in unincorporated Los Angeles County, near the City of Whittier. The SJCWRP provides primary, secondary and tertiary treatment) and has current flow of 73.1 million gallons per day (mgd) and a design capacity of 100 mgd, serving a population of over one million people (LACSD, 2015). The WRP generates approximately 42 million gallons per day of reclaimed water, which is reused at over 130 different reuse sites including groundwater recharge and irrigation for parks, schools, and greenbelts. The remainder of the tertiary treated water is discharged to the San Gabriel River (LACSD, 2015b). The SJCWRP is likely to be expanded to increase capacity by approximately 25 mgd for a total design capacity of approximately 125 mgd in order to accommodate projected wastewater treatment needs (LACSD, 2010). Wastewater flows that exceed the capacity of the San Jose Creek WRP, and all biosolids, are diverted to and treated at the Joint Water Pollution Control Plant located in the City of Carson (Raza, 2015). The Specific Plan area currently includes 101 dwelling units and 886,538 square feet of non- residential space. Table 3.12-5 shows the existing wastewater demand from the existing land uses within the Specific Plan area. Water treated at a primary level consists of removing solids from the wastewater. Secondary treatment involves aerating the wastewater to supply oxygen to microorganisms that feed on organic materials in the wastewater. Tertiary treatment involves the removal of any remaining suspended materials in the water and disinfection. ® ,,, . _ .. _.., ................. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.12-8 ESA I D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting_, Impacts and Mitigation Measures ......... ... _..... W,,,,. 3,12 Utility Services TABLE 3.12-5 EXISTING WASTEWATER GENERATION IN THE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA Estimated Wastewater Land Use Units Wastewater Use Factor (gpd)" 2 Generation (gpd) Residential 101 DUs 156-260 21,008 Average: 208 Non -Residential 886,538 sf 0.10 — 0.20 Average: 0.15 132,980.7 Total 153,988.7 Source: Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County. Irv11 lgcxr9.o t f ��qf q�eLa rkdY�lotr t � p �b3."x31 2 Range in roles are dare to size and type of development (i.e. single-family residwitial generates a granter amount of wastewater tl*an rruulti-family resididntial units; and some types of commercial, retail, and industrial development gonerate greater ammints of wastewater than others. DUs=dwelling units sf = square feet Storm Water Drainage The Specific Plan area is not located within a flood zone and the existing storm water drain systems that adequately serve the Specific Plan area are owned and maintained by the Los Angeles County Flood District (LACFD). The storm drain lines within the Specific Plan area consist of Reinforced Concrete Pipes (RCP), and vary from 36 to 63 inches in diameter. The general topography of the Specific Plan area slopes gently from the 400 feet above mean sea level (amsl) in the northeast to 300 feet amsl in the southwest; therefore, storm water flows by gravity from the northeast to the southwest. The storm water runoff collected within the Specific Plan area is ultimately conveyed downstream to the Big Dalton Wash approximately 0.2 mile southeast of the Specific Plan area (Cruikshank, 2014). The existing storm water drainage infrastructure within the Specific Plan area is described below and shown on Figure 3.12-1. Ramona Boulevard: A 36 -inch storm drain pipe is located within Ramona Boulevard from the east of the Specific Plan boundary and extends west and southwest on to Downing Street crossing Badillo Street, where it increases in size to 39 inches. In addition, a 48 -inch storm drain pipe is located within the east bound lane of Ramona Boulevard, from Maine Avenue to just west of Baldwin Park Boulevard, where it increases in size to a 63 -inch pipe that continues west past the western boundary of the Specific Plan area. Maine Avenue: A 24 -inch storm drain pipe is located within Main Avenue and begins from the north side of Clark Street and increases in size to a 42 -inch pipe at the south side of Clark Street. This storm drain continues south on the east side of the Maine Avenue until it reaches a manhole just north of Palm Avenue, where it increases to a 48 -inch storm drain and continues south to Ramona Boulevard. Downing Avenue: A 39 -inch storm drain is located in Downing Avenue from Ramona Boulevard to the southwest to a manhole near 3876 Downing Avenue, where it increases in size to a 48 -inch storm drain and continues to the southwest until just west of Pacific Avenue where it . ........ ,,,....... w ...._.... Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project w . 3 1 �2-9 m� ESA ID130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3 12 Utility Services is increases to a 54 -inch storm drain and continues on to Pacific Avenue, where it increases in size to a 63 -inch storm drain. Pacific Avenue: A 54 -inch storm drain is located within Pacific Avenue from Downing Avenue and extends to the southeast past the Specific Plan boundary (Cruikshank, 2014). Solid Waste Baldwin Park contracts for solid waste collection services with Waste Management of San Gabriel Valley/Pomona, who transports waste to the Azusa Land Reclamation Management Facility located in the City of Azusa. This facility is a 302 -acre regional facility serving Los Angeles Metro and Eastern Los Angeles County. It was opened in 1953 and has a current permit for operation through 2046. The landfill accepts 6,500 tons per day or 45,500 tons per week, and processes 604,310 tons annually. The Azusa Land Reclamation facility operates under a Solid Waste Facility Permit 19-QQ-0013 Conditional Use C-151, and the remaining permitted capacity is 52,640,160 cubic yards, approximately 63 percent of its total capacity (Waste Management, 2014). Table 3.12-6 shows the estimated amount of solid waste being generated within the Specific Plan area based on existing land uses. TABLE 3.12-6 ESTIMATED SOLID WASTE GENERATION FROM EXISTING LAND USES WITHIN THE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA Units Generation Factor' Solid Waste Generation Residential 101 du Non -Residential 886,538 sf Total 12.23 lbs/du/day 1,235.23 lbs/day 6 lbs/1,000 sf/day 5,319.29 lbs/day 6,554.45 lbs/day or 3.28 tons per day ' Derived from a list of generation rates maintained by CalRecyle of a variety of generation rate sources at http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/WASTECHAR/WasteGenRates/default.htm. CalRecyle does not provide standard solid waste generation rates by hnd case. 2 These factor; are estimates prior to recycling, composting or other waste diversion programs„ Factors do not include generation of construction debris. 3.12.2 Regulatory Setting State California Administrative Code Title 24 of the California Administrative Code includes the California Building Standards, which in turn includes the California Plumbing Code (Part 5), which promotes water conservation. Title 20 addresses public utilities and energy and includes appliance and efficiency standards that promote water conservation. In addition, a number of state laws require water -efficient plumbing fixtures in structures. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.12-10 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3.12 Utility Services Section 10610 of the California Water Code established the California Urban Water Management Planning Act (CUWMPA), requires urban water suppliers to initiate planning strategies to ensure an appropriate level of reliability in its water service. CUWMPA states that every urban water supplier that provides water to 3,000 or more customers, or that annually provides more than 3,000 acre-feet of water service, should make every effort to ensure the appropriate level of reliability in its water service to meet the needs of its various categories of customers during normal, dry, and multiple -dry years. The CUWMPA describes the contents of Urban Water Management Plans as well as methods for urban water suppliers to adopt and implement the plans. Senate Bill 610 Senate Bill (SB) 610 requires public urban water suppliers with 3,000 or more service connections to identify existing and planned sources of water for planned developments of a certain size. It further requires the public water system to prepare a specified water supply assessment for projects that meet the following criteria: a) A proposed residential development of more than 500 dwelling units; b) A proposed shopping center employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 500,000 sf of floor space; c) A commercial office building employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 250,000 sf of floor space; d) A hotel or motel, or both, with more than 500 rooms; e) An industrial, manufacturing, or processing plant, or industrial park planned to house more than 1,000 persons, occupying more than 40 acres of land, or having more than 650,000 sf of floor area; and f) A mixed-use project that includes one or more of the projects above. The components of a WSA include existing water demand, future water demand by the project, and must ensure that water is available for the project during normal years, a single dry year, and multiple dry years during a 20 -year future projection period. The WSA must also describe whether the project's water demand is accounted for in the water supplier's UWMP. Supplies of water for future water supply must be documented in the WSA. Senate Bill 221 SB 221 prohibits approval of land use development of more than 500 dwelling units unless the applicable public water supply system provides written verification that sufficient water supply is available. California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939) redefined solid waste management in terms of both objectives and planning responsibilities for local jurisdictions and Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.12-11 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3.12 utility Services the state. AB 939 was adopted in an effort to reduce the volume and toxicity of solid waste that is landfilled and incinerated by requiring local governments to prepare and implement plans to improve the management of waste resources. AB 939 required each of the cities and unincorporated portions of the counties to divert a minimum of 25 percent of the solid waste sent to landfills by 1995 and 50 percent by the year 2000. To attain goals for reductions in disposal, AB 939 established a planning hierarchy utilizing new integrated solid waste management practices. These practices include source reduction, recycling and composting, and environmentally safe landfill disposal and transformation. Other state statutes pertaining to solid waste include compliance with the California Solid Waste Reuse and Recycling Act of 1991 (AB 1327), which requires adequate areas for collecting and loading recyclable materials within a project site. As a new waste generator, the proposed project would be subject to the requirements of these solid waste provisions, as enforced by the County of Orange. Regional Regional Water Quality Control Board Each RWQCB is required to develop, adopt, and implement a Basin Plan for its respective region. The Basin Plan is the master policy document that contains descriptions of the legal, technical, and programmatic bases of water quality regulation in each region. Basin Plans identify beneficial uses of surface waters and groundwater within the corresponding region; specify water quality standards, known as water quality objectives, for both surface water and groundwater; and develop the actions necessary to maintain the standards to control nonpoint and point sources of pollutants to the state's waters. All discretionary projects requiring permits from the RWQCB (i.e., waste and pollutant discharge permits) must implement Basin Plan requirements (i.e., water quality standards), taking into consideration the beneficial uses to be protected. The Specific Plan Area is located within the jurisdiction of LARWQCB, and the proposed Specific Plan is subject to the LARWQCB's Water Quality Control Plan. Local Ordinance 1297 Chapter 50 of the City of Baldwin Park Municipal Code: Solid Waste Management Chapter 50 of the City of Baldwin Park Municipal Code, which was adopted as Ordinance 1297 in February 2007, regulates solid waste management in the City of Baldwin Park. The collection and disposal of refuse and recyclable materials is a matter requiring control and regulation by the City in order to protect the public peace, health, safety and general welfare. The regular, thorough and continuous collection of refuse and recyclable material is necessary to protect the public peace, health, safety and general welfare. In order to ensure that such would be accomplished, the City shall issue one or more franchises to a qualified person(s) to collect refuse and/or recyclable materials upon an exclusive basis under such terms and conditions as are contained in the City's Municipal Code and as may be prescribed by the City of Baldwin Park City Council. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.12-12 ESA! D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures ,r ._ 3.12 Utility Services Chapter 52 of the City of Baldwin Park Municipal Code: Storm Water and Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention No person shall cause or threaten to cause the discharge of pollutants to the MS4 by exposing such pollutants to storm water runoff. The site for every planning priority project shall be designed to control pollutants, pollutant loads, and runoff volume to the maximum extent feasible by minimizing impervious surface area and controlling runoff from impervious surfaces through infiltration, evapotranspiration, bioretention and/or rainfall harvest and use. Subject commercial facilities shall implement BMPs prescribed by the regional board or its Executive Officer, through programs or actions made pursuant to the municipal NPDES permit, as more particularly described in the city's Storm Water Quality Management, or any revisions made thereto. Industrial facilities not subject to the General Industrial Activities Storm Water NPDES Permit but are subject to pollution control requirements under the municipal NPDES permit, shall implement BMPs prescribed by the regional board or its Executive Officer, through programs or actions made pursuant to the municipal NPDES permit. Chapter 53 of the City of Baldwin Park Municipal Code: Construction and Demolition Materials Management Plan The Construction and Demolition Materials Management Plan (CDMMP) is part of City municipal code. For all construction, demolition, and renovation projects within the City for which total costs are or are projected to be greater than or equal to $50,000 dollars (CalRecycle, 2015) and developers must recycle construction and demolition materials generated during. CDMMPs are required to include the following: • The estimated volume or weight of the project construction and demolition material, by material type, to be generated; • The maximum volume or weight of construction and demolition materials that is feasible to divert; • The vendor or facility where the project applicant proposed to use to collect, divert, market, reuse or receive that material; and • The estimated volume or weight of residual construction and demolition materials that -would-be transported- for disposaLin a-landfilfor-transformation--facility. - -- Estimates of volume or weight of materials are required to be included in the C&DMMP using the standardized conversion rates approved by the city of this purpose. In preparing the C&DMMP, applicants for building or demolition permits involving the removal of all or part of an existing structure are required to consider deconstruction, to the maximum extent feasible, and make the materials generated thereby available for salvage prior to being transported for disposal in a landfill or transformation facility. Deconstruction can be used to meet the 50 percent diversion requirement provided it is accounted for in the CDMMP. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.12-13 ESA r D1 30953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures — 3.12 it Services City of Baldwin Park General Plan The following policies in the General Plan address are applicable to the proposed Specific Plan. Water Resources Goal 5.0: Conserve and protect groundwater supply and water resources. Policy 5.1: Encourage water conservation through education, use of drought tolerant landscapes, and water -conserving technology. Policy 5.2: Promote the use of native plant material in landscapes and drought tolerant trees, especially in landscapes on City properties. Policy 5.3: Encourage the use and production of reclaimed water. Integrated Waste Management Policy 7.1: Implement goals and policies contained in the City's Household Hazardous Waste and Source Reduction and Recycling Elements as mandated by state law A13939, as amended. Policy 7.2: Maximize public awareness of all source reduction and recycling programs. Policy 7.3: Encourage composting of organic materials and recycling in general as an alternative to waste disposal. Policy 7.4: Encourage participation in local and County waste disposal programs for such household hazardous waste items as automotive products, paints, chemicals, tires and batteries. 3.12.3 Thresholds of Significance Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines indicates that impacts on utilities and service systems could result in a significant impact if it would: • Conflict with wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board; • Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects; 0 Have insufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or need new or expanded entitlements; • Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has inadequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments; _. __,.—....._ . ........ ..... __..... . Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.12-14 ESA t D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures .........m�. 3 12 Utility Services • Be served by a landfill with insufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs; or • Not comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. 3.12.4 Methodology The potential for adverse impacts on utilities and service systems has been evaluated based on information concerning current service levels and the ability of the service providers to accommodate the increased demand created by the proposed Specific Plan. 3.12.5 Impact Analysis Impact 3.12.1: The proposed project could conflict with wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board The project would introduce 289,135 square feet of non-residential uses and 833 new residential units within the Specific Plan area, which would result in increased generation of wastewater. Wastewater generated by the proposed Specific Plan development would be treated at the SJCWRP for which wastewater treatment requirements have been established by the LARWQCB NPDES Permit CA0053911. Waste discharge requirements for the facility are based on all applicable state and federal regulations, policies and guidelines, and include limitations on effluent discharge and receiving water. In general, waste effluent discharge requirements include specifications for adequate disinfection treatment and limitations on radioactivity, pollutant concentrations, sediments, pH, temperature, and toxicity. Receiving water requirements include limitations related to temperature, sediments, pH, dissolved oxygen, fecal coliform and other pollutant concentrations, water clarity and color, turbidity, and toxicity. The land uses proposed by the Specific Plan include retail, residential, open space, and public areas that would not discharge wastewater that contains harmful levels of toxins that are regulated by the LARWQCB and all effluent would comply with the wastewater treatment standards of the RWQCB. The Specific Plan would not facilitate any industrial use development, which generally has more adverse impacts on wastewater treatment. Furthermore, discussed in Impact 3.12.2 below, wastewater generated by the Specific Plan would not exceed the existing capacity -SJCWRP. Therefore; the -project would -result -in less- than -significant impacts related -to -the wastewater treatment requirements of the RWQCB. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation required Significance after Mitigation: Less than significant Impact 3.12-2: The proposed project could require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.12-15 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures ® .....�,,,, 3,12 Utility Services The proposed Specific Plan land uses would contribute to an increase in residential and retail, open space, and civic uses within the Specific Plan area. The proposed Specific Plan would introduce 289,135 square feet of non-residential uses and 833 new residential units within the Specific Plan area at build out. Water Infrastructure Build out of the Specific Plan would generate an increase in demand of 195.95 AFY (see Table 3.12-7 below), which is an increase of 57.45 AFY over existing conditions. TABLE 3.12-7 _ SPECIFIC PLAN AREA EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER DEMAND IN S Existing Proposed Industrial and 1.40 3.83 5.36 2.28 3.19 Manufacturing Open Space, (Schools, Parks and 2.40 10.55 25.32 10.55 25.32 Churches) Low Demand (Freeways. Channels, 0.00 40.41 0 40.41 0 Vacant Land) Total Existing 138.50 Total at Build Out 195.95 Total Increase 57.45 'SOURCE: Civiltec, 2011, As described in Section 2.0 Project Description, and in the Baseline Infrastructure Study, the water demand and location of development at build out of proposed Specific Plan would require the water line on Bogart Avenue that runs from Clark Street to Ramona Boulevard to be upgraded from a six-inch to an eight -inch line. This improvement is included as part of the proposed Specific Plan, and the construction of which is included in all of the evaluations included in this EIR. For example, construction emissions are included in the calculations within Section 3.2 Air Quality and noise generated from construction of the water line is included in Section 3.9, Noise. There are no additional areas of water infrastructure that would need to be improved to serve the Specific Plan area at build out. Therefore, impacts related to water infrastructure expansion would be less than significant. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.12-16 ESA / of 30953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2016 Duty Specific Plan Specific Plan Land Use Category Factor' Acres Demand (AFY) Acres Demand (AFY) Single Family 3..10 7.73 23.96 6.54 20.27 Residential Multi -Family Residential, Low 4.60 0.53 2.44 0.53 2.44 Density Multi -Family Residential, High 6.70 0 0 8.35 72.28 Density Commercial 1.60 50.89 81.42 45.28 72.45 Industrial and 1.40 3.83 5.36 2.28 3.19 Manufacturing Open Space, (Schools, Parks and 2.40 10.55 25.32 10.55 25.32 Churches) Low Demand (Freeways. Channels, 0.00 40.41 0 40.41 0 Vacant Land) Total Existing 138.50 Total at Build Out 195.95 Total Increase 57.45 'SOURCE: Civiltec, 2011, As described in Section 2.0 Project Description, and in the Baseline Infrastructure Study, the water demand and location of development at build out of proposed Specific Plan would require the water line on Bogart Avenue that runs from Clark Street to Ramona Boulevard to be upgraded from a six-inch to an eight -inch line. This improvement is included as part of the proposed Specific Plan, and the construction of which is included in all of the evaluations included in this EIR. For example, construction emissions are included in the calculations within Section 3.2 Air Quality and noise generated from construction of the water line is included in Section 3.9, Noise. There are no additional areas of water infrastructure that would need to be improved to serve the Specific Plan area at build out. Therefore, impacts related to water infrastructure expansion would be less than significant. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.12-16 ESA / of 30953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2016 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3....12 Utility.. Services Wastewater Infrastructure The proposed Specific Plan would intensify land uses within the Specific Plan area and would result an increased generation of wastewater flows. As shown below in Table 3.12-8, build out of the proposed Specific Plan would result in wastewater generation of approximately 370,623 gallons per day, which is an increase of 216,634 gallons per day over existing conditions. TABLE 3.12-8 ESTIMATED INCREASE IN WASTEWATER GENERATION Estimated Wastewater Units Generation (gpd) Net Wastewater Land Use ExistingProposed Increase Use Factor Existing Proposed Residential 101 DUs 934 DUs 833 DUs 156 - 2603 21,008 194,272 Average: 208 Non -Residential 886,538 sf 1,175,676 sf 289,138 sf 0.10-0.20 132,980.7 176,351.4 Average: 0.15 Total: 153,988.7 370,623.4 Total Increase: 216, 634.7 r Existing residential and non-residential development estimated from the acreages provided in Table 2-1 in Chapter 2, Project Description. 2 Source; Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, http://www.lacsd org/civica/filebank/blobdload,asp7BloblD=3531. 3 Rates vary depending on type of development. For example, single-family residential uses generate a greater amount of wastewater than multi -family residential uses and some types of industrial development generate greater amounts of wastewater than others. The average within the range was used for both. DU=dwelling units sf = square feet As described, the SJCWRP has a current inflow of 73.1 million gallons per day, with a design capacity of 100 million gallons per day. Therefore, SJCWRP has an excess treatment capacity of approximately 29.6 million gallons per day and would have sufficient capacity to process the additional average wastewater flow of 216,634 gallons per day that would be generated by the Specific Plan at build out. Therefore, implementation of the Specific Plan would not result in impacts to the WRP. 1-n addition, the -increase in flews in the Maine and Pacific Avenues sewer with -build -out of the — Specific Plan is estimated to be 0.064 cubic feet per second (cfs), and 0.028 cfs within the Baldwin Park Boulevard sewer, which are two major sewer trunk lines within the Specific Plan area, and would receive the wastewater flows from development that would occur under the Specific Plan (Baldwin Park, 2014). In addition, the rest of the sewer mains in the Specific Plan area are eight inches in diameter or larger, which have adequate capacity to handle the increased sewage generated by implementation of the proposed Specific Plan (Baldwin Park, 2014). Overall, the increase in flows from build out of the proposed Specific Plan would not require expansion of any wastewater infrastructure (Baldwin Park, 2014). Therefore, the proposed Specific Plan would not increase wastewater generation such that the existing infrastructure capacity would be exceeded, and would therefore not require the construction or expansion of Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.12-17 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting. Impacts and Mitigation Measures —...,.. 3 12 Utility Services existing wastewater treatment facilities, which could cause significant environmental effects. Impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation required Significance after Mitigation: Less than significant Impact 3.12-3: The proposed project could require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities, or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. The Specific Plan area is a developed urban area that is largely covered by impervious surfaces. By implementing the proposed Specific Plan improvements to streetscapes, pedestrian walkways, increasing parking spaces, etc., the proposed Specific Plan development would minimally alter local drainage patterns. Storm water would continue to be captured and conveyed by the existing storm drains that serve the Specific Plan area. The proposed development in the Specific Plan area would generate little or no increase in the runoff to the existing drainage system, since more than 90 percent of the existing Specific Plan area is already impervious due to urban development (Baldwin Park, 2014). Also, Low Impact Development (LID) requirements provide that development projects implemented by the Specific Plan must incorporate BMPs to retain storm water onsite or manage the difference between the storm water runoff volumes pre- and post -construction (the change in storm water quality volume) through onsite retention. In addition, the City's municipal code requires that the City review site design BMPs through requiring the submittal of BMP storm water design and grading plan and calculations demonstrating that the BMPs would have adequate capacity to handle the design volume flow (see Section 3.7, Hydrology and Water Quality, for more details). Furthermore, the proposed Specific Plan involves implementation of landscaped street frontages as part of streetscape improvements, landscaped areas adjacent to pedestrian walkways, and landscaped open space as part of the new Arts Park. These vegetated areas would capture and infiltrate some of the surface water runoff, and would reduce the overall amount of surface runoff generated and entering existing storm drains. Therefore, new development pursuant to the proposed Specific Plan would not result in the need to expand storm drain facilities. Thus, impacts to the environment resulting from the construction or expansion of storm water drainage facilities would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation required Significance Determination: Less than significant Impact 3.12-4: The proposed project would be served from existing entitlements and resources, or would it require or result in new or expanded entitlements. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.12-18 ESA t D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures M ....,. ....... _. 3.12 Utility Services The proposed Specific Plan would increase the amount of development within the existing Specific Plan area. As shown in Table 3.12-7, the proposed Specific Plan area would result in an increase in water supply demand of 57.45 AFY at full build out; from 138.50 AFY to 195.95 AFY. Table 3.12-9 shows the existing and projected supplies and demand within the VCWD service area. Between 2015 and 2035, water demand is projected to increase by approximately 645 AFY, while supplies would remain constant, which would result in a regular decrease in available supplies. The proposed land uses within the Specific Plan area are anticipated to build out by 2035; at which time VCWD would have approximately 452.55 AFY of surplus supplies available. The proposed Specific Plan would utilize 57.45 AFY at full build out, leaving 395.10 AFY as available surplus supplies. As a result, the proposed Specific Plan would not result in the need for new or expanded water supply entitlements. Therefore, impacts related to water supply entitlements would be less than significant. TABLE 3.12-9 EXISTING AND PROJECTED DEMAND, SUPPLIES, AND AVAILBLE SUPPLIES 2010 (AFY) 2016 2020 (AFY) 2025 (AFY) 2030(AFY) 2035 (AFY) (AFY) Existing & Projected 8,313.4 10,356 10,356 10,356 10,356 10,356 Supplies Existing & Projected 8,313.4 9,201 9,372 9,536 9,695 9,846 Demand Available Supplies 1,155 984 820 661 510 Proposed Project Increase 57.45 57.45 57.45 57.45 57.45 in Demand' Surplus Available 1,097.55 926.55 762.55 603.55 452.55 Supplies 'This demand estimate is for full buildout of proposed land uses within the Specific Plan area. It is not currently known when full buildout would be achieved, as projects are market-driven. Therefore, for a conservative estimate, full buildout demand is assumed from 2015 onward. SOURCE: Civiltec, 2011; ESA, 2014 Mitigation Measures: No mitigation required Significance Determination: Less than significant Impact 3.12.5: The proposed project could result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider that would serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments. As shown in Table 3.12-8, build out of the proposed Specific Plan would result in wastewater generation of approximately 370,623 gallons per day, which is an increase of 216,634 gallons per Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.12-19 ESA I D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures -- -....., 3.12 Utility Services day over existing flows from the Specific Plan area, which is approximately 153,989 gallons per day. As described previously, the SJCWRP has a current inflow of 74.4 million gallons per day, with a design capacity of 100 million gallons per day. Therefore, SJCWRP has an excess treatment capacity of approximately 29.6 million gallons per day, and would have sufficient capacity to process the additional average wastewater flow of 216,634 gallons per day that would be generated by build out of the Specific Plan. Therefore, SJCWRP has adequate capacity to serve the Specific Plan's projected demand in addition to SJCWRP's existing commitments, and impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation required Significance Determination: Less than significant Impact 3.12.6: The proposed project could be served by a landfill with insufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs. The proposed development associated with the Specific Plan would result in net increase in density and development of land uses within the area, which would result in an increase in solid waste generation. Table 3.12-10 compares the existing and proposed solid waste generation in the Specific Plan area. TABLE 3.12-10 SOLID WASTE GENERATION FROM PROPOSED AND EXISTING LAND USES Generation Existing Units Solid Waste Proposed Units Proposed Solid Factor' Generation Waste Generation Residential 12.23 101 du 1,235.231bs/day 934 du 11422.82 lbs/day lbs/du/day Non -Residential 6 lbs/1,000 886,538 sf 5,319.29 lbs/day 1,175,673 sf 7054.04 lbs/day sf/day Total 6,554.45 18,476.86 lbs /day lbs/day or 3.28 or 9.24 tons /day tons/da Derived from a list of generation rates maintained by CalRecyle of a variety of generation rate sources at Jz'1 w_�bArocyc e..aa toyANASTECHARiWasteGeuiRrlta)sJcOelatdtlAm. CalRecyle does not provide standard solid waste generation rates by land use. These factors are estimates prior to recycling, composting or other waste diversion programs. Factors do not include generation of construction debris. As shown above in Table 3.12-10, compared to the total existing solid waste generation rate of approximately 6,554 pounds (3.28 tons) per day, build out of the proposed Specific Plan would generate an estimated 18,477 (9.24 tons) pounds per day. This would result in an increased generation of 11,923 pounds (5.96 tons) of solid waste per day compared to existing development within the Specific Plan area. Waste generated by the Specific Plan area would continue to be Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.12-20 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures .,. 3,12 Utility Services hauled to the Azusa landfill, which accepts a maximum of 8,000 tons of solid waste per day. The maximum permitted capacity is 80,571,760 cubic yards; the remaining capacity is 51,512,201 cubic yards. There is approximately 64 percent of the permitted space remaining; the anticipated closure date is 2045. Therefore, the additional 5.96 tons of solid waste generated by the project at build out would be within the daily tonnage accepted by the landfill. Further, the City would be required to comply with state mandates to divert 50 percent of all solid waste from landfills. Therefore, impacts related to solid waste would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation required Significance Determination: Less than significant Impact 3.12.7: The proposed project could not comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. The Specific Plan would comply with the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939), which requires local governments to prepare and implement plans to improve the management of waste resources. The project will divert a minimum of 50 percent of solid waste generated by the project per AB 939. Per the California Solid Waste Reuse and Recycling Act of 1991 (AB 1327), the project would provide adequate areas for collecting and loading recyclable materials. The Specific Plan would comply with all federal state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. Impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation required Significance Determination: Less than significant Cumulative Impacts The cumulative analysis area for public services includes the area served by each specific provider. The potential for project -generated impacts to contribute to a significant cumulative impact would occur if the effects from more than one project are located within the same service area of the infrastructure facilities or purveyor providing services. For example, the geographic area associated with water .supply in) pacl would be the area served by VCWD; and impacts associated with water and sewer infrastructure tend to be localized and could be exacerbated if other development projects occur within proximal locations to the Specific Plan area. Additionally, the cumulative analysis for utilities is based on the related projects list Table 2-7 in Chapter 2, Project Description that identifies 18 related projects surrounding the Specific Plan area. These projects include 12 related projects within the City of Baldwin Park, three in the City of Covina, two in the City of Irwindale, and one in the City of Rosemead. The majority of projects on the related projects list are small commercial, light industrial (warehouse), and small residential projects. The largest project (i.e., over 100,000 square feet) is the Irwindale Shopping Center located at 500 Speedway Drive in the City of Irwindale (located approximately 2.20 miles Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.12-21 ESA I D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3, Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures Y12 — 3.Utility Services from the Specific Plan area). The largest proposed residential development comprises of 450 residential units located in the City of Covina. Water As described above, the UWMP finds that adequate water supplies existing that would support potential future development and that with addition of proposed Specific Plan development, adequate supplies would be available. It is required that every urban water supplier assess the reliability to provide water service to its customers under normal, dry, and multiple dry water years to ensure reliability and provide water supply information to make land use planning decisions. Several of the related projects listed on Table 2-7 in Chapter 2, Project Description are within the VCWD service area. As described above these are generally small residential, commercial, and light industrial projects within the VCWD. These projects are not anticipated to require water supplies beyond the available surplus with build out of the proposed Specific Plan area. The proposed Specific Plan would increase water demand by approximately 57.45 AFY. An available surplus of 1,097.55 to 452.55 AYF from year 2015 to 2035 would remain after implementation of the Specific Plan. The related projects consist of commercial, light industrial (warehouse) and infill residential projects would increase the use of water and reduce the available water surplus supplies. However, surplus water would continue to be available after implementation of the proposed project and cumulative projects. Therefore, there are sufficient water supplies to support the existing and related developments. As a result, implementation of the proposed Specific Plan would not result in cumulatively considerable impacts related to water supply. In the early 1960s, groundwater rights were adjudicated in the Basin to regulate the natural safe yield that can be withdrawn from the aquifer without adverse effect, after considering natural replenishment from runoff and precipitation. However, the adjudicated pumping amounts are greater than the natural replenishment of the groundwater basins, creating an annual deficit, or overdraft. Because of this, the Water Replenishment District of Southern California is enabled under the California Water Code to purchase and recharge additional water to make up the overdraft, which is known as artificial replenishment, or managed aquifer recharge. Regional projects to increase water supply reliability are currently underway by Water Replenishment District of Southern California, including the Groundwater Reliability Improvement Program (GRIP), which is a recycled water project that would replace imported water with recycled water for recharge in the Montebello Forebay. GRIP is the result of numerous studies conducted over a number of years to improve water supply reliability in the face of imported water supply uncertainties and increasing costs (AECOM, 2014). Additionally, the Specific Plan has evaluated infrastructure needs for water service and has included an improvement to a portion of an existing water service pipeline to ensure that build out of the Specific Plan would be served by adequate infrastructure. The adjacent water service areas are developed with urban uses that are currently served by water infrastructure. Furthermore, all new development within the VCWD service area would be required to pay its share of the costs Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.12-22 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures �e _ _....._ ..... ........ 3,12 Utility Services of infrastructure improvements. As a result, implementation of the proposed Specific Plan would not result in cumulatively considerable impacts related to water infrastructure. Wastewater Build out of the proposed Specific Plan along with the related projects would add demand for wastewater services within the service area of the LACSD. SJCWRP has an excess treatment capacity of approximately 29.6 million gallons per day, and would have sufficient capacity to process the additional average wastewater flow of 216,634 gallons per day that would be generated by build out of the Specific Plan. The excess treatment capacity is substantial, such that the projected demand generated by the Specific Plan development combined with the related projects would not exceed the existing capacity of the SJCWRP, as concluded by project related correspondence with LACSD. The availability of adequate sewer line capacity along with the continuous assessment of capacity flows would be determined on a project -by -project basis. The related projects listed in Table 2-7 in Chapter 2, Project Description are geographically spread out and would not utilize the same sewer lines. Additional future development projects would be required to verify that existing capacity exists to convey and treat the potential wastewater generated by the new development. Therefore, impacts to wastewater facilities generated by the Specific Plan in combination with the related projects would not be cumulatively considerable. Storm Water Cumulative impacts related to storm water infrastructure are specific to the infrastructure serving both the Specific Plan area and the related projects. Developed areas surrounding the Specific Plan area are of similar urban nature, and any development would not substantially increase the amount of impervious surfaces and runoff, such that existing storm drains would be overwhelmed because all development projects would be required to comply with the LID requirements for storm water to incorporate BMPs to retain storm water onsite or manage the difference between the storm water runoff volume pre- and post -construction (the change in storm water quality volume) through onsite retention. The LID requirements are designed such that projects that are large enough or have activities that could impact to offside areas are regulated by specific performance standards implemented by BMPs that would result in a reduction of potential ill,lpacts to storm water drainage Iliac coidd combine with relrtted projects~ Irl addition, the C ty"S nlLuiIicipal code requires that the City review site, design BM1"s through recluiting the submittal of BMP storm water design and grading plan and calctllations de�iiio strating that the L MI''s wottld have adequate capacity to handle the design volume flow, on a project -by -project basis. As a result, storm water runoff would be managed by each development projects through implementation of regulations that would reduce potential cumulative impacts to be less than cumulatively considerable. Solid Waste Future development associated with build out of the proposed Specific Plan and related projects within the regional area would impact solid waste collection and disposal services. Baldwin Park, Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.12-23 ESA I D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3.12 Utility Services along with cities in the surrounding area, would continue to use common landfill resources, thereby reducing the capacity of local landfills including the Azusa landfill, which disposes of waste from the Specific Plan area. Although the proposed Specific Plan would not significantly impact existing landfill capacity, the increase in solid waste generation from implementation of the proposed Specific Plan and related projects together could significantly impact the finite resources associated with solid waste disposal. The proposed Specific Plan would result in an increased generation of 11,923 pounds (5.96 tons) of solid waste per day compared to existing development within the Specific Plan area. Waste generated by the Specific Plan area would continue to be hauled to the Azusa landfill, which accepts a maximum of 8,000 tons of solid waste per day. The proposed Specific Plan would result in an increase of less than 0.1 percent of the maximum permitted waste per day. The related projects are similar in nature and would require similar amounts of waste disposal; however, the cumulative total would be less than one- half a percent of the daily landfill capacity. Because the cumulative increase is less than half a percent and the landfill is operating with capacity until 2045, there is sufficient capacity to support the existing, proposed Specific Plan, and related projects. In addition, individual development projects and related projects would be required to meet recycling objectives, reducing the amount of solid waste requiring disposal at landfills. All development projects would be required to comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. Pursuant to the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939), every city and county in the state is required to divert 50 percent of solid waste generated in its jurisdiction away from landfills. Implementation of source reduction measures would continue to divert solid waste away from landfills. The contribution of the proposed Specific Plan to cumulative impacts associated with landfill capacity would be less than cumulatively considerable. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation required Significance Determination: Less than significant Baldwin Park TOO Specific Plan Project 3.12-24 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures -- 3.12 Utility Services References - Utility Services AECOM, Draft Environmental Impact Report Groundwater Reliability Improvement Program (GRIP) Recycled Water Project, March 2014. Accessed at: http://www.wrd.org/grip/GRIP—DEIR—March2Ol4.pdf on February 17, 2015. Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (LARWQCB). 2009. NPDES No. CA0053911. Waste Discharge Requirements For Joint Outfall System San Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant Discharge To San Gabriel River Via Discharge Outfall Nos. 001, 001a, 001b, And 003 And San Jose Creek Via Discharge Outfall No. 002. Accessed at litl wwv, vNcb.c t.. c vlr c t l�4ll . �t ti cit„ isit ray/t ntzti � �elet,lrl��lt rtlr r1; �1,.c9 t ;t�,ca« t c+�c%f00�1Y06 (i 111 t; Yi sgd1gy isgTX, 20 i gnt lit —1V t.tea'? }SJR:n5{1 I f , " 21C) tiITcc ) Y(19am.,p(iron February 3, 2015. CalRecycle. 2015. Local Government Summaries: C&D Los Angeles County: Jurisdictions with Ction v� Via& Demolt�tionwC&tDI�Ordinances. lm�Accessed at,'I�,tror"sfl o�;Ang�lt+l�tm ���"a i chrttar, 2015. City of Baldwin Park, City of Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan, adopted November 20, 2002. Civiltec Engineering (Civiltec). 2011. Valley County Water District 2010 Urban Water Management Plan, prepared by CIVILTEC Engineering. June, 2011. John M. Cruikshank Consultants, Inc., Baseline Infrastructure Study, City of Baldwin Park Downtown Transit Oriented Development Specific Plan, May 20, 2014. Los Angeles Cotllity &tllitatlon Districts, San ,lose Creek Water Reelarnattiotl Plattt, littp,//www.btc,s(i,org/was�tewatej,/wwfacilities/j(iiiit- outfall .systeii _wrl)/saii_.jose_creek.as p, accessed on December 4, 2014. Los Angeles Comity Sarttitalioii Districts, Wlttl.l:ier Narrows Water lt,cclamadoti Plaatlt', httl://www.lac d.targ/watsteWw�terlwwt�zciliticsjoitt ott4i11 systr� wrp/wliil.t;ier_narrows.a sp, accessed on December 4, 2014. LACSD. 2015a. Who We Are And What We Do For You. Accessed at http://www.lacsd.org/wastewater/wastewater—services/proposition-21 8/facilities. asp on January 6, 2015. Los Angeles County Sanitation District (LACSD). 2015b. San Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant. Accessed at http://www.lacsd.org/wastewater/wwfacilities/joint_Outfall_system_wrp/san_j ose_creek.as p on January 6, 2015. Main San Gabriel Basin Watermaster (MSGBW). 2015. "About us." Accessed at http://www.watermaster.org/geninfo.html on January 14, 2015. Raza, Adriana, Customer Service Specialist, Facilities Planning Department, Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts, email communication, January 13, 2015. Valley County Water District (VCWD). 2011. Urban Water Management Plan. Accessed at http://www.water.ca.gov/urbanwatermanagement/20 I Ouwmps/Valley%20County%20 W ate Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.12-25 ESA 1 D1 30953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures 112 Utility" Services r%20Distriet/VCWD%202010`/`20UWMP%2OVolume%201-Report.pdf on January 12, 2015. Waste Management, Azusa Land Reclamation, http://wwwl.wmsolutions.com/facilities/details/id/l81, accessed December 3, 2014. Waste Management, Baldwin Park, http://www.wm.com/location/califomia/baldwin- park/indexjsp, accessed December 3, 2014. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3.12-26 ESA I D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 CHAPTER 4 Alternatives 4.1 CEQA Requirements According to the CEQA Guidelines, an EIR must evaluate a reasonable range of alternatives to a proposed project that could feasibly attain most of the basic project objectives, and that would avoid or substantially lessen the proposed project's significant environmental effects. This alternatives analysis summarizes the alternatives screening process conducted to identify feasible alternatives that meet project objectives, along with an evaluation of those feasible alternatives. As required by CEQA, this analysis first considers which alternatives can meet most of the basic project objectives, and then to what extent those remaining alternatives can avoid or reduce the environmental impacts associated with the proposed project. Section 15126.6(f) of the CEQA Guidelines provides direction on the required alternatives analysis: The range of alternatives required in an EIR is governed by a "rule of reason " that requires the EIR to set forth only those alternatives necessary to permit a reasoned choice. The alternatives shall be limited to ones that would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project. Of those alternatives, the EIR need examine in detail only the ones that the Lead Agency determines could feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project. The range of feasible alternatives shall be selected and discussed in a manner to foster meaningful public participation and informed decision making. The alternatives may include a different type of project, modification of the proposed project, or suitable alternative project sites. An EIR need not consider every conceivable alternative to a project. Rather, the alternatives must be limited to ones that meet the project objectives, are feasible, and would avoid or substantially lessen at least one of the significant environmental effects of the project. "Feasible" means capable of -being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into account economic, environmental, legal, social, and technological factors. Section 15126.6(b) of the CEQA Guidelines states that an EIR: ...must idents ways to mitigate or avoid the significant effects that a project may have on the environment, the discussion of alternatives shall focus on alternatives to the project or its location which are capable of avoiding or substantially lessening any significant effects of the project, even if these alternatives would impede to some degree the attainment of the project objectives, or could be more costly. Section 15126.6(d) of the CEQA Guidelines provides further guidance on the extent of alternatives analysis required: Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 4-1 ESA / D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 4, Alternatives The EIR shall include sufficient information about each alternative to allow meaningful evaluation, analysis, and comparison with the proposed project. A matrix displaying the major characteristics and significant environmental effects of each alternative may be used to summarize the comparison. If an alternative would cause one or more significant effects in addition to those that would be caused by the project as proposed, the significant effects of the alternative shall be discussed, but in less detail than the significant effects of the project as proposed. The EIR must briefly describe the rationale for selection and rejection of alternatives and the information the Lead Agency relied on when making the selection. It also should identify any alternatives considered but rejected as infeasible by the Lead Agency during the scoping process and briefly explain the reasons for the exclusion. Alternatives may be eliminated from detailed consideration in the EIR if they fail to meet most of the project objectives, are infeasible, or do not avoid any significant environmental effects. Section 15126.6(e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines also requires that the No Project Alternative must be addressed in this analysis. The purpose of evaluating the No Project Alternative is to allow decision -makers to compare the potential consequences of the proposed project with the consequences that would occur without implementation of the proposed project. Finally, an EIR must identify the environmentally superior alternative, and CEQA Guidelines (Section 15126.6(e)(2)) requires that if the environmentally superior alternative is the No Project Alternative, the EIR shall identify an environmentally superior alternative among other alternatives. As identified in Section 2.4 of Chapter 2, Project Description, the primary objectives of the Specific Plan is to identify land use options that include increased housing densities and mixed uses, as well as create pedestrian linkages between the Metrolink station, community facilities and major recreation, retail, and residential nodes of activity. As guided by the Baldwin Park 2020 General Plan, the City "seeks to strengthen the economic vitality and aesthetic character of the Downtown through the establishment of a mixed use pedestrian district which builds on Livable Communities principles and techniques." The goals for the Downtown TOD Specific Plan include: • Create a mix of uses with residential and employment densities that support transit use; • Offer a range of housing options proximate to transit; • Leverage the location of the Metrolink Station to bring revitalizing activities to Downtown; • Create vibrant and diverse commercial corridors that provide a strong community identity and sense of place in the heart of town; • Design a pedestrian -friendly environment with well-designed buildings, attractive streetscapes, and engaging public spaces; Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 4-2 ESA / D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 4 Alternatives • Create multi -modal streets accommodate pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicles; • Increase level of goods and services available to residents of the community; • Provide new employment and housing opportunities; • Attract shoppers from outside the community; and • Strengthen the City's tax base. 1.2 Review of Significant and Unavoidabl@, Environmental Impacts Based on the CEQA Guidelines, several factors need to be considered in determining the range of alternatives to be analyzed in an EIR and the level of analytical detail that should be provided for each alternative. These factors include (1) the nature of the significant impacts of the proposed project; (2) the ability of alternatives to avoid or lessen the significant impacts associated with the project; (3) the ability of the alternatives to meet the objectives of the project; and (4) the feasibility of the alternatives. The analysis in this EIR indicates that the Specific Plan would result in significant and unavoidable impacts with respect to the following: • Air Quality (Construction — Project and Cumulative). Because the construction intensity, phasing, length, and schedule of individual projects that would be implemented by the Specific Plan and related projects that would be implemented in addition to the Specific Plan is unknown, there is the possibility that more projects could occur at the same time, or different phasing combinations could overlap to result in increased levels of emissions that would exceed thresholds after implementation of mitigation. Therefore construction impacts related to regional air pollutants would be significant and unavoidable. • Noise (Construction — Project Only). Because the Downtown area is currently urban, developed, and includes sensitive receptors, and the project would develop additional residential/sensitive uses, circumstances would occur where future construction sites are located immediately adjacent to existing sensitive land uses. Under these conditions, noise impacts related to a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels above levels existing without the proposed project would be significant and unavoidable. As the Lead Agency, the City of Baldwin Park will decide whether to proceed with the proposed project or whether to accept or reject any of the alternatives identified in this chapter. As required by the CEQA Guidelines, the City's selection will be presented in the findings that are required to be made before the City certifies the EIR and takes action on the project. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 4-3 ESA / D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 4, Alternatives 4.1.3 Alternatives Considered, but Rejected for Analysis Alternative Site Alternative sites were not selected for evaluation because the primary purpose of the proposed Specific Plan is to guide redevelopment of Downtown Baldwin Park by providing increased housing densities and mixed uses, as well as create pedestrian linkages between the Metrolink station, community facilities and major recreation, retail, and residential nodes of activity in the Downtown area. This would take advantage of mixed use TOD opportunities presented by the location of the existing Metrolink station. Since all of the project objectives are related to Baldwin Park's downtown area, none of these objectives could be met in another location. 4.2 Project Alternatives Three alternative scenarios, representing a range of reasonable alternatives to the proposed Specific Plan, were selected for analysis, and are described below. Alternative 1: No Project Alternative (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) Section 15126.6(e)(3)(A) of the CEQA Guidelines states that when the project is the revision of an existing land use plan, policy, or ongoing operation, the No Project alternative can be evaluated as the continuation of the existing plan, policy, or operation into the future. Land use decisions in the proposed Specific Plan are currently governed by the City of Baldwin Park General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. Implementation of the No Project Alternative would represent the continuation of the existing Baldwin Park General Plan and the Zoning Ordinance. This alternative evaluates the environmental effects of the No Project Alternative, which would result in build out of the Specific Plan area according to the existing General Plan and zoning designations. Under Alternative 1, the Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan would not be approved and no associated components identified under the proposed Specific Plan would be implemented. This alternative would not include development of a new Arts Park across from City Hall or provide the circulation or streetscape changes that would occur by under the proposed Specific Plan. Pursuant to the existing General Plan and zoning, some intensification of development and some new mixed use uses would occur. The resulting development of new land uses under this alternative would be less than build out of the proposed Specific Plan. The No Project alternative would result in a total of 603 residential units and 1,149,222 square feet of non-residential development at build out; and as shown in Table 4-1, this alternative would result in 331 fewer residential units and 26,451 fewer square feet of non-residential space than build out of the proposed Specific Plan. Baldwin Park TOD Specific plan Project 4-4 ESA / D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 4. Alternatives TABLE 4-1 NO PROJECT ALTERNATIVE DIFFERENCE IN DEVELOPMENT AT BUILD OUT Residential Non -Residential Units (SF) Existing Development 101 886,538 Existing Zoning Increase in Development 502 262,684 .Dcveloarrro) crit -.... 833 289.135 Proposed ��saliruo Plan Zonin Increase m .......s Difference Between Existing Zoning and Proposed 331 26,451 Zoning at Build Out SOURCE: The Arroyo Group, 2014.. Alternative 2: Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative Alternative 2, the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative would include a smaller Specific Plan area. Under this alternative the Specific Plan area would be reduced by a total of 20.48 acres, from 115 acres to 94.52 acres. The Industrial Commercial area in the northeastern portion of the Specific Plan area that is proposed for continued Industrial Commercial uses would not be included in the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative because industrial related land uses are not consistent with residential mixed uses, which are the preferred land uses within a TOD. This would reduce the Specific Plan area by approximately 2.98 acres. In addition, the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative would not include the proposed residential uses within 500 feet of the Metrolink rail line and station, which includes 17.5 acres of land that would be designated for additional residential uses by the proposed Specific Plan. The non-residential uses included in the proposed Specific Plan that are within 500 feet of the Metrolink station would be developed consistent with the proposed Specific Plan. The neighborhood commercial, retail, and Industrial Commercial areas that would be zoned for mixed use by the proposed Specific Plan would remain non-residential uses. The Industrial Commercial parcel at the northeastern portion of the Specific Plan area would continue to be used for non-residential commercial/industrial purposes, and the existing single-family residential area would not -be rezoned to be -Garden -Multi -Family Residential (1„l:): This alternative: would result in 130 fewer residential units and 27,217 less non-residential square footage at build out compared to the proposed Specific Plan, as shown in Table 4-2. Like the proposed Specific Plan, the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative would provide an Arts Park, active storefronts, pedestrian nodes with amenities such as street furniture, and lighting. In addition, this alternative would implement all of the circulation improvements that are proposed as part of the Specific Plan. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 4-5 ESA / D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 4. Alternatives TABLE 4-2 REDUCED SPECIFIC PLAN AREA ALTERNATIVE DIFFERENCE IN DEVELOPMENT AT BUILD OUT Existing Development Proposed Specific Plan Increase in Development Residential Non -Residential Units (SF) 101 886,538 833 289,135 Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative Increase in Development 703 261,918 Difference in Build Out Between Proposed Project and the 130 27,217 Reduced Development Alternative SOURCE: The Arroyo Group, 2014. Alternative 3: Reduced Development Alternative Alternative 3, the Reduced Development Alternative, would reduce the overall increase in maximum development allowed under the proposed Specific Plan by 25 percent. This alternative was selected for analysis because a reduced development could avoid or lessen the significant impacts associated with the project, while meeting the objectives of the project. As described in Section 2.0, Project Description, build out of the proposed Specific Plan would result in an increase of 833 residential units and 289,135 square feet of non-residential development. Alternative 3 would develop 208 fewer residential units and 72,284 less square feet of non- residential space than the proposed Specific Plan, as shown in Table 4-3. TABLE 4-3 REDUCED DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVE DIFFERENCE IN DEVELOPMENT AT BUILD OUT Residential Non -Residential Units (SF) Existing Development 101 886,538 Proposed Specific Plan Increase in Development 833 289,135 Reduced Development Alternative Increase in Develo ment 625 216,851 Difference in Build Out Between Proposed Project and 208 72,284 the Reduced Development Alternative SOURCE: The Arroyo Group, 2014. Under this alternative, R1 single-family zoning within the Specific Plan would remain and the number of dwelling units per acre would be reduced from 30 du/ac to 20 du/ac and non- residential development would be reduced to 25 percent less than would be developed by the proposed Specific Plan. The reduced density of development that would occur by this alternative would not result in the need to improve the water line on Bogart Avenue, between Clark Street and Ramona Boulevard, ___. ,.. _,_.,..._...,._.__ ..... .......... - Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 4-6 ESA / D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 4. Alternatives which is included in the proposed Specific Plan. The Reduced Development Alternative would provide an Arts Park, active storefronts, pedestrian nodes with amenities such as street furniture, and lighting; in addition, to all of the circulation improvements that would be implemented by the Specific Plan. 4.2.1 Environmental Analysis Alternative 1: No Project Alternative (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) The following discusses the impacts associated with the No Project Alternative (Build Out According to Existing Zoning), Alternative 1, in comparison to the impacts of the proposed Specific Plan. Aesthetics Under the No Project (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) Alternative, 331 fewer residential units and 26,451 fewer square feet of non-residential space would be developed than under the proposed Specific Plan. However, this development would not include the cohesive urban and architectural design elements that would be implemented by the proposed Specific Plan. The visual appearance of some parcels within the Specific Plan area would be less dense than what would occur by the proposed Specific Plan. The architectural design elements under this alternative would be similar to the existing conditions, and would not unify the Downtown area, as would be done by the_proposed Specific Plan. The No Project (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) Alternative would not result in the introduction of unifying design and development guidelines that are intended to create a distinctive center for the Downtown area with attractive streets and public spaces that would be implemented by the proposed Specific Plan. Therefore, this alternative would result in greater adverse impacts on the overall visual quality of Baldwin Park's Downtown as compared to the proposed Specific Plan, which would result in an improvement in aesthetics and enhancement of character within the Downtown area. Both the proposed project and the No Project (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) Alternative would introduce additional sources of light and glare. Even though development under the proposed Specific Plan would be greater than under this alternative, both would result in similar less than significant impacts with implementation of the City's existing lighting regulations (Municipal Code Section 153.140.040), which provide light and glare performance standards for development within the City that state that lighting shall be the minimum necessary in order to achieve the purpose of the light and that all lights shall be directed, oriented and shielded to prevent light from shining onto adjacent properties, onto public rights-of-way, and into driveway areas in a manner that would obstruct motorists' vision. Therefore, lighting and glare related impacts would be similar. Air Quality The No Project (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) Alternative would not result in changes to zoning or the General Plan land uses. Therefore, it would be consistent with the AQMP and Baldwin Park TOD Specift Plan Project 4-7 ESA / D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 4, Alternatives result in fewer impacts than the less than significant impacts to the AQMP that would result from the proposed Specific Plan. This alternative would result in 331 fewer residential units and 26,451 fewer square feet of non-residential space than build out of the proposed Specific Plan. Therefore, it would generate fewer construction and operational emissions than would occur under the proposed Specific Plan. However, because the construction intensity, phasing, length, and schedule of individual projects that would be implemented by this alternative is unknown, there is the same possibility that occurs under the proposed Specific Plan that multiple construction projects could occur at the same time, or different phasing combinations could overlap to result in increased levels of emissions that would exceed thresholds after implementation of mitigation. Therefore construction impacts under the No Project (Build -out According to Existing Zoning) Alternative would be significant and unavoidable, which is the same as would occur under the proposed Specific Plan. The existing zoning does not promote TOD and does not provide improvements to circulation and connectivity that would help to reduce vehicle trips. Overall, this alternative would result in fewer air quality impacts than the proposed Specific Plan, but would not achieve the long-term objective of reducing vehicle trips to the same degree as the proposed Specific Plan. Due to the reduction in build out that would occur by the No Project (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) Alternative less air quality impacts would occur from operation than by the proposed Specific Plan. Cultural Resources Previously unknown and unrecorded archaeological and paleontological resources could exist anywhere within the Specific Plan area, and may be unearthed during excavation and grading activities for individual projects. This can occur even in already developed areas, as older buildings are known to have often been built on top of or within archaeological deposits and previously undiscovered artifacts or remains could be uncovered during excavation or construction activities related to the proposed Specific Plan. The No Project Alternative (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) would involve 331 fewer residential units and 26,451 fewer square feet of non-residential space than build out of the proposed Specific Plan. However, this development would occur in the similarly developed urban area, and would consist of redevelopment and infill of existing land uses. Therefore, this alternative could adversely affect historic, archaeological, or paleontological resources, or disturb human remains, which would be reduced to a less than significant impact with implementation of similar mitigation measures. Therefore, under this alternative, impacts related to cultural resources would be similar to the impacts of the proposed Specific Plan, and would be less than significant with mitigation measures. Greenhouse Gas Emissions The No Project (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) Alternative would involve 331 fewer residential units and 26,451 fewer square feet of non-residential space than build out of the proposed Specific Plan. Therefore, GHG emissions that would result from this alternative would be less than would occur from implementation of the proposed Specific Plan. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 4-8 ESA / D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 4. Alternatives However, the intent of the Specific Plan to provide a cohesive TOD plan for the Downtown area, to build upon the General Plan framework and improvements to circulation and connectivity that would help to reduce vehicle trips, would not be implemented under this alternative. Overall, this alternative would result in fewer GHG emission impacts than the proposed Specific Plan, but would not achieve the long-term objective of reducing vehicle trips through the cohesive TOD plan for the area or by the TOD circulation improvements to the same degree as the proposed Specific Plan. Overall, due to the reduction in build out that would occur by the No Project (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) Alternative, less GHG emission impacts would occur than by the proposed Specific Plan. Impacts related to GHG emissions would be less under this alternative than the less than significant impacts that would result from implementation of the proposed Specific Plan. Hazards and Hazardous Materials The No Project (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) Alternative Plan would result in 331 fewer residential units and 26,451 fewer square feet of non-residential space than the proposed Specific Plan, but would still involve demolition or re -use of structures constructed prior to the 1970s that could include asbestos, lead-based paints, or PCB -containing materials. In addition, implementation of development within the Downtown area could result in the exposure of contaminated soil during construction activities. Even though fewer buildings would be demolished and reconstructed under this alternative, the risks related to hazards and hazardous materials would be similar in nature to what would occur under the proposed Specific Plan, and would be required to comply with existing federal, state, and regional regulations. Therefore, this alternative would have similar less than significant impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials. Hydrology and Water Quality Under the No Project (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) Alternative, 331 fewer residential units and 26,451 fewer square feet of non-residential space than build out of the proposed Specific Plan. Therefore, potential water quality impacts associated with the No Project (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) Alternative would be less than the proposed Specific Plan because higher density development that could lead to increased levels of trash, nutrients, bacteria, pesticides, herbicides, oil and grease being washed into Big Dalton Wash and to Walnut Creek, which ultimately drains to the San Gabriel River. However, both the proposed Specific Plan and the No Project (Build -out According to Existing Zoning) Alternative would-be required to include Low Impact Development features, NPDES and LARWQCB SUSMP requirements, and implementation of BMPs at each development site. Therefore, build out of the Downtown area under both the proposed Specific Plan or this alternative would provide required improvements pursuant to existing regulations to ensure that impacts related to water quality would be less than significant. However, potential water quality impacts under the No Project (Build -out According to Existing Zoning) Alternative would be less than the proposed Specific Plan because it would result in higher density development that could lead to increased pollutants. The Downtown area is urban and developed. The development that would occur under both the proposed Specific Plan and the No Project (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) Alternative I I I 1 ,.1-1- ... ___ ----- ....._ -....... ... ..w.....�....... Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 4-9 ESA f D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 4. Alternatives would consist of infill and redevelopment of already urban/developed areas. However, the proposed Specific Plan would reduce the amount of impervious surfaces because it includes improvements to expand landscaping areas along streets (as a part of the streetscape improvements) and landscaped open space within the proposed Arts Park, which are not included in the No Project (Build -out According to Existing Zoning) Alternative. Because the proposed Specific Plan would introduce more pervious surfaces throughout the Downtown area through implementation of the landscaping and open space that would not be implemented by the No Project (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) Alternative, impacts related to hydrology under the No Project (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) Alternative would be greater than the proposed Specific Plan. Land Use and Planning Under the No Project (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) Alternative, no General Plan Amendment or a zoning change would occur since development would be consistent with the existing General Plan and zoning. However, as described in Section 1.0, Introduction, the proposed Specific Plan has been prepared to implement the General Plan to create a cohesive TOD plan for the Downtown area that specifically addresses: the distribution, location, maximum development criteria, standards, regulations, transportation, transit, parking, and infrastructure improvements that are necessary to maximize the TOD opportunities in the Downtown area. This alternative would not provide a cohesive plan for optimal functioning of a TOD area. The No Project (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) Alternative would not implement TOD development in a planned manner that would maximize TOD opportunities within the area. With the absence of a Specific Plan to guide development through 2035, TOD would be considered on a project -by -project basis, which would not provide for a cohesive future land use plan that would maximize TOD land use and circulation opportunities. This alternative would not implement the pedestrian and bicycle circulation patterns identified in the Specific Plan to improve access to the Metrolink station. In addition, this alternative would not implement SCAG policies that encourage greater densities in areas with TOD opportunities and less dependence on the automobile. Furthermore, the General Plan includes policies to include the development of outdoor cafes, flower sales, stalls, and kiosks, and other uses compatible with pedestrian activity, which are specifically implemented by the proposed Specific Plan within the streetscape design guidelines. The No Project (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) Alternative would not implement this policy in a design specific cohesive manner, such as would be done by the streetscape guidelines in the proposed Specific Plan. Therefore, this No Project (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) Alternative would have greater impacts related to land use and planning than the proposed Specific Plan. Noise The No Project (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) Alternative would result in 331 fewer residential units and 26,451 fewer square feet of non-residential space than build out of the proposed Specific Plan. However, because the Downtown area is urban and developed, the development that would occur under both the proposed Specific Plan and the No Project (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) Alternative would consist of infill and redevelopment of Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 4-10 ESA f D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 already urban/developed areas that would result in similar construction and operation related noise impacts. However, this alternative would not include the Arts Park and roadway improvements, and because the overall development potential would be reduced compared to the proposed Specific Plan, the No Project (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) Alternative would result in an incremental reduction in construction and operational noise impacts. However, noise sources would continue to be adjacent to or nearby existing sensitive receptors in the Downtown area; and therefore, would result in a significant and unavoidable construction noise impact, which is the same as what would occur by the proposed Specific Plan. Even though the existing zoning does not promote TOD in an area specific manner as would be done by the proposed Specific Plan, which is intended to reduce vehicle trips, the existing zoning would result in 331 fewer residential units and 26,451 fewer square feet of non-residential space than the proposed project. Thus, fewer vehicular trips would occur by the No Project (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) Alternative than by the proposed Specific Plan. As a result, less vehicular noise would be generated by this alternative than under the proposed Specific Plan, and vehicular related operational noise impacts would be less under the No Project (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) Alternative than the less than significant operational impacts that would occur by the proposed Specific Plan. Other operational impacts related to equipment, machinery, loading docks, or operation of other facilities under this alternative would be the similar as what would occur by the proposed Specific Plan, and would result in less than significant impacts. Population and Housing Under the No Project (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) Alternative, 331 fewer residential units and 26,451 fewer square feet of non-residential space than build out of the proposed Specific Plan. The increase in population that would be generated by both this alternative and the proposed Specific Plan are consistent with SCAG forecasts and would not induce substantial population growth in the project area. The No Project (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) Alternative and the proposed Specific Plan would result in similar less than significant impacts related to population and housing. Public Services and Recreation Under the No Project (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) Alternative, impacts to police and fire services that would be generated by the increased population and- densities of development under the proposed Specific Plan would be lessened because 331 fewer residential units and 26,451 fewer square feet of non-residential space would be developed. Since the residential and worker population would not increase to the same degree, fewer police or fire personnel would be required to serve the Downtown area at build out under the existing zoning. As with public services, the No Project (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) Alternative would result in fewer demands on park and recreational facilities because it would not result in the additional population that would be generated by the proposed Specific Plan. However, this alternative would not include development of the Arts Park that would help to offset the recreational needs related to population growth. Overall, this alternative would result in less Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 4-11 ESA / D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 4. Alternatives development at build out and would result in fewer impacts on public services and recreational resources than the less than significant impacts that would result from the proposed Specific Plan.. Traffic The No Project (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) Alternative would result in 331 fewer residential units and 26,451 fewer square feet of non-residential space at build out. Therefore, fewer traffic trips would be generated from this alternative than the proposed specific plan. Due to the growth that would occur from build out of the existing zoning in the Downtown area, similar roadway improvements may need to be implemented as described in Mitigation Measures TRAF-1 through TRAF-3. Under both scenarios operational traffic impacts would be mitigated to a less than significant level; however, the No Project (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) Alternative would result in fewer traffic -related less than significant impacts than the proposed Specific Plan. Utilities and Service Systems The No Project (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) Alternative would result in less development at build out than the proposed Specific Plan. Since the residential and worker population would not increase to the same degree under this alternative, as would occur under the proposed Specific Plan, less utility capacity would be required to serve the Downtown area at build out. Water supply demands and wastewater generation, and landfill capacity needs would be less than what would occur by the proposed Specific Plan. Therefore, this alternative would result in reduced less than significant impacts compared to the proposed Specific Plan. Conclusion Under Alternative 1, the No Project (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) Alternative, the impacts of the proposed Specific Plan are compared to the impacts that would occur if the existing General Plan and zoning continued to be implemented in the Downtown area. Compared to the proposed Specific Plan, the potential environmental impacts from the No Project Alternative (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) Alternative would be less than the proposed Specific Plan in the areas of operational air quality and vehicular noise, greenhouse gasses, public services and recreation, traffic, and utilities. The No Project (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) Alternative would have similar impacts related to construction related air quality, cultural resources, construction noise, hazardous materials, and population and housing. The No Project (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) Alternative would have greater impacts related to aesthetics, hydrology, water quality, land use, and planning than the proposed Specific Plan. Additionally, the No Project (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) Alternative would not reduce the significant and unavoidable construction air quality and noise impacts of the proposed Specific Plan to a less than significant level. As described above, build out of the existing zoning would result in less overall development, but would not provide an integrated approach to future development that takes advantage of Downtown's proximity to the Metrolink station, which is the focus of the Specific Plan. As described in Section 1.0, Introduction, the proposed Specific Plan has been prepared to implement the General Plan to create a cohesive TOD plan for the Downtown area that Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 4-12 ESA f D130593 Draft Environmental Impact {deport April 2015 specifically addresses: the distribution, location, maximum development criteria, standards, regulations, transportation, transit, parking, and infrastructure improvements that are necessary to maximize the TOD opportunities in the Downtown area. The No Project (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) Alternative would not implement TOD development in a planned manner that would maximize TOD opportunities within the area. With the absence of a Specific Plan to guide development through 2035, TOD would be considered on a project -by -project basis, which would not provide for a cohesive future land use plan that would maximize TOD land use and circulation opportunities. This alternative would not implement the pedestrian and bicycle circulation patterns identified in the Specific Plan to improve access to the Metrolink station. In addition, this alternative would not implement SCAG policies that encourage greater densities in areas with TOD opportunities and less dependence on the automobile. Furthermore, the General Plan includes policies to include the development of outdoor cafes, flower sales, stalls, and kiosks, and other uses compatible with pedestrian activity, which are specifically implemented by the proposed Specific Plan within the streetscape design guidelines. The No Project (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) Alternative would not implement this policy in a design specific cohesive manner, such as would be done by the streetscape guidelines in the proposed Specific Plan. Therefore, this No Project (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) Alternative would not achieve the project objectives of providing pedestrian linkages or the TOD connectivity summarized above. Alternative 2: Reduced Specific Plan Area The following discusses the impacts associated with Alternative 2, the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative, in comparison to the impacts of the proposed Specific Plan. Aesthetics Under Alternative 2, Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative, the Specific Plan area would be reduced by 20.48 acres, from 115 acres to 94.52 acres, and 130 fewer residential units and 27,217 fewer square feet of non-residential space would be developed than by the proposed Specific Plan. Mixed use developments that contain residential uses above commercial would not occur within 500 feet of the Metrolink station. As a result, vertical integration of residential into the existing streetscape would not occur within 500 feet of the Metrolink station. The non-residential uses included in the proposed Specific Plan that are within 500 feet of the. Metrolink station would be developed consistent with the proposed Specific Plan. This alternative would implement design standards for new development within the smaller Specific Plan area that would introduce cohesive urban and architectural design elements as well as create a more pedestrian -friendly environment. The Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative would not include the area proposed to remain Industrial Commercial in the northeastern portion of the proposed Specific Plan area. This area is planned to remain the same and intensification of the Industrial Commerical land uses would not occur. The design standards and cohesive pedestrian environment would not extend to this portion of the Downtown area, and would not introduce unifying design and development guidelines within this area that are part of creating a distinctive center for the Downtown area. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 4-13 ESA / D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 Thus, the Industrial Commerical area would not be visually integrated with the rest of the Downtown area. However, overall, this alternative would result in similar less than significant impacts on the overall visual character and quality of the Downtown area as compared to the proposed Specific Plan. Both the proposed project and the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative would introduce additional sources of light and glare. Even though development under the proposed Specific Plan would be greater and introduce more sensitive light receptors near non-residential uses than under this alternative, both would result in similar less than significant impacts with implementation of the City's existing lighting regulations (Municipal Code Section 153.140.040), which provide light and glare performance standards for development within the City that state that lighting shall be the minimum necessary in order to achieve the purpose of the light and that all lights shall be directed, oriented and shielded to prevent light from shining onto adjacent properties, onto public rights-of-way, and into driveway areas in a manner that would obstruct motorists' vision. Therefore, lighting and glare related impacts would be similar and less than significant under both the proposed Specific Plan and the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative. Air Quality Under Alternative 2, Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative, 130 fewer residential units and 27,217 fewer square feet of non-residential space would be developed than by build out of the proposed Specific Plan. Therefore, it would generate fewer construction and operational emissions than would occur under the proposed Specific Plan, and there would be less of a possibility that multiple construction projects could occur at the same time, or different phasing combinations could overlap to result in increased levels of emissions that would exceed thresholds after implementation of mitigation. Even though the possibility is less, exceedances could still occur; therefore construction impacts under the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative would be significant and unavoidable, which is the same as what would occur by the proposed Specific Plan. The Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative would not locate residential uses within 500 feet of the Metrolink rail line and station, which would reduce potential impacts related to Toxic Air Contaminants (TACs). The proposed Specific Plan would require implementation of Mitigation Measures AIR -3 and AIR -4 that would reduce impacts to less than a significant level, which require all residential uses within 500 feet of the Metrolink Station or line to implement all available best management practices and control technologies to reduce emissions to below regulatory thresholds (that currently require a less than 10 in one million increase in cancer risk, and less than 1 for non -cancer risk). This includes the requirement that all new residential uses within 500 feet of the Metrolink tracks shall be equipped with a filtered air supply system to maintain units under positive pressure when windows are closed. Because the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative would not include new residential uses within 500 feet of the Metrolink tracks, no mitigation would be required to result in a less than significant impact related to TACs, Therefore, the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative would result in fewer impacts related to TACs than would occur by the proposed Specific Plan. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 4-14 ESA ( D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 4. Alternatives Overall, due to the reduction in build out that would occur by the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative less air quality emissions associated with vehicle emissions, natural gas combustion for space and water heating, and landscaping, which would be less than the less than significant impacts generated from the proposed Specific Plan, and TAC related land use mitigation measures would not be required. However, construction related air quality impacts would be significant and unavoidable under the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative. Cultural Resources Alternative 2, the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative, would not include the area proposed to remain Industrial Commercial in the northeastern area from the proposed Specific Plan and new residential uses would not be located within 500 feet of the Metrolink station. However, the potential to impact unidentified historic resources or encounter unknown archaeological and/or paleontological resources would still remain within the Reduced Specific Plan Area, and previously undiscovered artifacts or remains could be uncovered during excavation or construction activities related to the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative. Therefore, this alternative could adversely affect historic, archaeological, or paleontological resources, or disturb human remains, which would be reduced to a less than significant impact with implementation of similar mitigation measures as those that would be implemented by the proposed Specific Plan. Therefore, under the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative, impacts related to cultural resources would be similar to the impacts of the proposed Specific Plan, and would be less than significant with mitigation measures. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Alternative 2, the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative, would not include the area proposed to remain Industrial Commercial in the northeastern area from the proposed Specific Plan and new residential uses would not be located within 500 feet of the Metrolink station. The Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative would develop 130 fewer residential units and 27,217 fewer square feet of non-residential space than the proposed Specific Plan. Therefore, GHG emissions that would result from this alternative would be less than would occur from implementation of the proposed Specific Plan. As described above, this alternative would implement all of the circulation improvements that would improve pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular circulation within the smaller specific plan area for the Downtown. Due to the reduction in build out that would occur by the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative and implementation of TOD related circulaadon improvements, less GHG emission impacts would occur by the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative than by the proposed Specific Plan. Thus, this alternative would result in reduced less than significant impacts from both construction and operation compared to the proposed Specific Plan. Hazards and Hazardous Materials Alternative 2 would not include the existing Industrial Commercial uses that are located within in the northeastern portion of the Downtown area. In addition, the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative would not include the proposed residential uses within 500 feet of the Metrolink rail line and station, which includes 17.5 acres of land that would be designated for additional Baldwin Park TDD Specific Plan Project 4-15 ESA! D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 4. Alternatives residential uses by the proposed Specific Plan. The non-residential uses included in the proposed Specific Plan that are within 500 feet of the Metrolink station would be developed consistent with the proposed Specific Plan. Even though fewer buildings would be demolished and reconstructed under this alternative than the proposed Specific Plan, the risks related to hazards and hazardous materials would be similar in nature, and would involve demolition or re -use of structures constructed prior to the 1970s that could include asbestos, lead-based paints, or PCB -containing materials. In addition, implementation of development within the Downtown area could result in the exposure of contaminated soil during construction activities. However, the risks related to hazards and hazardous materials would be similar to what would occur under the proposed Specific Plan, and would be required to comply with existing federal, state, and regional regulations. Therefore, this alternative would have similar less than significant impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials, as the proposed Specific Plan. Hydrology and Water Quality Alternative 2, the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative, would not include the area proposed to remain Industrial Commercial in the northeastern area from the proposed Specific Plan and would develop 130 fewer residential units and 27,217 fewer square feet of non-residential space than the proposed Specific Plan. Impacts associated with higher density development within the reduced Specific Plan area that could lead to increased levels of,trash, nutrients, bacteria, pesticides, herbicides, oil and grease being washed into the storm drains would occur, although, overall, it would occur in smaller quantities due to the decreased level of development under this scenario. Impacts to water quality related to construction activities could also occur under this alternative and would be similar in nature to those that could occur by the proposed Specific Plan. Like developments that would occur under the proposed Specific Plan, adherence to regulations like the NPDES permitting process, and the LARWQCB SUSMP requirements, and implementation of BMPs would be required under this alternative. In addition, this alternative would implement the streetscape improvements that would be implemented by the Specific Plan, which would increase landscaping area and pervious surfaces. Overall, this alternative would result in similar less than significant impacts related to hydrology and water quality as the proposed Specific Plan. Land Use and Planning Alternative 2, the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative, would not include the area proposed to remain Industrial Commercial in the northeastern area of the proposed Specific Plan and additional residential uses within 500 feet of the Metrolink rail line would not be included. This alternative would result in 130 fewer residential units and 27,217 less non-residential square feet compared to the proposed Specific Plan. Because this alternative would allow less mixed use and high density residential development near the Metrolink Station as the proposed Specific Plan, it would not maximize the potential for TOD development within the Downtown area and would be less consistent with the SCAG policies that encourage maximizing opportunities related to transit - oriented development and less dependence on the automobile. Overall, this alternative would Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 4-16 ESA / D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 4. Alternatives have greater less than significant planning related consistency impacts compared to the proposed Specific Plan. Noise Alternative 2, the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative, would not include the area proposed to remain Industrial Commercial in the northeastern portion of the Specific Plan area and would not include residential uses within 500 feet of the Metrolink rail line, and would result in 130 fewer residential units and 27,217 less non-residential square footage compared to the proposed Specific Plan. Because the Downtown area is urban and developed, the development that would occur under both the proposed Specific Plan and the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative would consist of infill and redevelopment of already urban/developed areas that would result in similar construction and operation related noise impacts. Because the overall development potential would be reduced compared to the proposed Specific Plan, this would result in an incremental reduction in construction and operational noise impacts. However, noise sources would continue to be adjacent to or nearby existing sensitive receptors in the Downtown area; and therefore, would result in a significant and unavoidable construction noise impact, which is the same as what would occur by the proposed Specific Plan. As described in Section 3.8, Noise, noise levels from the Metrolink train reach as high as approximately 75 dBA CNEL, and noise levels up to 75 dBA CNEL are considered by the General Plan to normally be incompatible for residential developments. In addition, because commercial and industrial zoned uses are located directly adjacent to the Metrolink line (i.e., commercial zone parcel located at the intersection of Ramona Boulevard and Bogart Avenue; industrial zone parcel located at intersection of Downing Avenue and Alderson Avenue), it is anticipated that the noise environments in these areas may also exceed the 80 dBA CNEL and 85 dBA CNEL noise levels that are deemed to be compatible for residential uses, respectively. Because implementation of the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative would not include residential uses within 500 feet of the Metrolink line, this noise/land use incompatibility impact would not occur. Furthermore, the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative would not require implementation of Mitigation Measure N0I-5, which requires all residential uses within 500 feet of the Metrolink line to implement appropriate land use planning for exterior private areas, and implement noise reduction measures, such as sound walls, double pane windows, and insulation features included in the design to meet the City's the interior noise standards of 45 dBA CNEL. Therefore, operational noise from implementation of the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative would not locate sensitive uses near the Metrolink line, which would result in less than the less than significant impacts of the proposed Specific Plan. Population and Housing Alternative 2, the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative, would not include the area proposed to remain Industrial Commercial in the northeastern area from the proposed Specific Plan and would develop 130 fewer residential units and 27,217 fewer square feet of non-residential space than the proposed Specific Plan. The increase in population that would be generated by both this Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 4-17 ESA / D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 4. Alternatives alternative and the proposed Specific Plan are consistent with SCAG forecasts and would not induce substantial population growth in the project area. However, because the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative would generate less residents and employees, this alternative would result in fewer less than significant impacts related to population and housing than the proposed Specific Plan. Public Services Alternative 2, the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative, would not include the area proposed to remain Industrial Commercial in the northeastern area from the proposed Specific Plan and no new residential uses would be developed within 500 feet of the Metrolink line. This would result in development of 130 fewer residential units and 27,217 fewer square feet of non-residential space than the proposed Specific Plan at build out. Since the residential and worker population would not increase to the same degree, fewer police or fire personnel would be required to serve the Downtown area at build out of the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative. As with public services, the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative would result in fewer demands on park and recreational facilities because it would not result in the additional population that would be generated by the proposed Specific Plan. In addition, this alternative would include development of the Arts Park that would help to offset the recreational needs related to population growth. Overall, this alternative would result in less development at build out and would result in fewer impacts on public services and recreational resources than the less than significant impacts that would result from the proposed Specific Plan. Traffic Alternative 2, the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative, would not include the area proposed to remain Industrial Commercial in the northeastern portion of the Specific Plan area and would not include residential uses within 500 feet of the Metrolink rail line, and would result in 130 fewer residential units and 27,217 less non-residential square footage compared to the proposed Specific Plan. Because the Downtown area is urban and developed, the development that would occur under both the proposed Specific Plan and the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative would consist of infill and redevelopment of already urban/developed areas that would result in similar construction and operation activities. However, fewer traffic trips would be generated from this alternative than the proposed specific plan due to the reduced growth that would occur from this alternative. However, because this alternative would not provide residential uses within 500 feet of the Metrolink station, additional vehicular trips from residential uses outside of walking distance could occur. In addition, similar roadway improvements may need to be implemented as described in Mitigation Measures TRAF- 1 through TRAF-3. Under both scenarios operational traffic impacts would be mitigated to a less than significant level; therefore, traffic related impacts under the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative would be similar to what would occur by the proposed Specific Plan. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 4-18 ESA / D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 4, Alternatives Utilities and Service Systems Alternative 2, the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative, would not include the area proposed to remain Industrial Commercial in the northeastern area from the proposed Specific Plan and would develop 130 fewer residential units and 27,217 fewer square feet of non-residential space than the proposed Specific Plan. Since the residential and worker population would not increase to the same degree under this alternative, as would occur by the proposed Specific Plan, less utility capacity would be required to serve the Downtown area at build out. Water supply demands and wastewater generation, and landfill capacity needs would be less than what would occur by the proposed Specific Plan. Therefore, this alternative would result in reduced less than significant impacts compared to the proposed Specific Plan. Conclusion Alternative 2, the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative, would remove the area proposed to remain Industrial Commercial in the northeastern area from the proposed Specific Plan, and would not provide for additional residential uses within 500 feet of the Metrolink station. As a result, this alternative would develop 130 fewer residential units and 27,217 fewer square feet of non-residential space than the proposed Specific Plan. The reduced development would generate fewer construction and operational related impacts. Compared to the proposed Specific Plan, the potential environmental impacts from the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative would be less than the proposed Specific Plan in the areas of operational air quality, greenhouse gasses, operational noise, population and housing, public services and recreation, and utilities. The Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative would have similar impacts related to aesthetics, construction related air quality, cultural resources, hydrology, water quality, construction noise, hazardous materials, transportation and traffic. The Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative would have greater impacts related to land use and planning than the proposed Specific Plan. Additionally, the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative would not reduce the significant and unavoidable construction air quality and noise impacts of the proposed Specific Plan to a less than significant level. As described above, Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative would result in less overall development; and would provide an Arts Park, active storefronts, pedestrian nodes with amenities such as street furniture, and lighting. In addition, this alternative would implement all of the circulation improvements included in the proposed Specific Plan. Because this alternative would allow less mixed use and high density residential development near the Metrolink Station compared to the proposed Specific Plan, it would not maximize the potential for TOD development within the Downtown area and would be less consistent with the SCAG policies that encourage maximizing opportunities related to TOD and less dependence on the automobile. The objectives of the proposed Specific Plan including increasing housing densities within walking distance of the Metrolink station. The Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative would implement that objective; however, to a lesser degree than the proposed Specific Plan. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 4-19 ESA / D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 4. Alternatives Alternative 3: Reduced Development Alternative The following discusses the impacts associated with the Alternative 3, Reduced Development Alternative in comparison to the impacts of the proposed Specific Plan. Aesthetics Alternative 3, the Reduced Development Alternative, would implement a less dense development within the Specific Plan area that would result in 208 fewer residential units and 72,284 less non- residential square footage at build out than the proposed Specific Plan. This alternative would implement design standards for the reduced dense development that would introduce cohesive urban and architectural design elements as well as create a more pedestrian -friendly environment, which would also occur under the proposed Specific Plan. Therefore, the Reduced Development Alternative would result in similar less than significant impacts on the overall visual character and quality of the Downtown area compared to the proposed Specific Plan. The Reduced Development Alternative would introduce fewer, and a reduced density of, additional sources of light and glare compared to the proposed Specific Plan. Even though development under the proposed Specific Plan would be greater and introduce more sensitive light receptors near non-residential uses than under this alternative, both would result in similar less than significant impacts with implementation of the City's existing lighting regulations (Municipal Code Section 153.140.040), which provide light and glare performance standards for development within the City that state that lighting shall be the minimum necessary in order to achieve the purpose of the light and that all lights shall be directed, oriented and shielded to prevent light from shining onto adjacent properties, onto public rights-of-way, and into driveway areas in a manner that would obstruct motorists' vision. Therefore, lighting and glare related impacts would be similar and less than significant under both the proposed Specific Plan and the Reduced Development Alternative. Air Quality Alternative 3 would result in 208 fewer residential units and 72,284 square feet less non- residential development than the proposed Specific Plan. Therefore, it would generate fewer construction and operational emissions than what would occur under the proposed Specific Plan. However, because the construction intensity, phasing, length, and schedule of individual projects that would be implemented by this alternative is unknown, and there would be less of a possibility that multiple construction projects could occur at the same time, or different phasing combinations could overlap to result in increased levels of emissions that would exceed thresholds after implementation of mitigation. Even though the possibility is less, exceedances could still occur; therefore construction impacts under the Reduced Development Alternative would be significant and unavoidable, which is the same as what would occur by the proposed Specific Plan. Cultural Resources Alternative 3, the Reduced Development Alternative, would result in 208 fewer residential units and 72,284 less non-residential square footage at build out than the proposed Specific Plan. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 4-20 ESA! D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 4. Alternatives Development would occur throughout the Specific Plan area, but would occur less densely than the proposed Specific Plan, However, the potential to impact unidentified historic resources or encounter unknown archaeological and/or paleontological resources would still remain within the Reduced Development Alternative, and previously undiscovered artifacts or remains could be uncovered during excavation or construction activities. Therefore, this alternative could adversely affect historic, archaeological, or paleontological resources, or disturb human remains, which would be reduced to a less than significant impact with implementation of similar mitigation measures as those that would be implemented by the proposed Specific Plan. Therefore, under the Reduced Development Alternative, impacts related to cultural resources would be similar to the impacts of the proposed Specific Plan, and would be less than significant with mitigation measures. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Alternative 3, the Reduced Development Alternative, would result in 208 fewer residential units and 72,284 less non-residential square footage at build out than the proposed Specific Plan. Therefore, GHG emissions that would result from this alternative would be less than what would occur from implementation of the proposed Specific Plan. As described above, this alternative would implement all of the circulation improvements that would improve pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular circulation within the Downtown area. Due to the reduction in build out that would occur by the Reduced Development Alternative and implementation of TOD related circulation improvements, less GHG emission impacts would occur by the Reduced Development Alternative than by the proposed Specific Plan. Thus, this alternative would result in reduced less than significant impacts from both construction and operation compared to the proposed Specific Plan. Hazards and Hazardous Materials Alternative 3, the Reduced Development Alternative, would develop 208 fewer residential units and 72,284 fewer square feet of non-residential space than the proposed Specific Plan, but would still involve demolition or re -use of structures constructed prior to the 1970s that could include asbestos, lead-based paints, or PCB -containing materials. In addition, implementation of development within the Downtown area could result in the exposure of contaminated soil during construction activities. Because commercial uses generally utilize and store more types and quantities of hazardous materials than other land uses, the reduction of 72,284 fewer square feet of non-residential space by this alternative would likely result in less quantities of hazardous materials within the Specific Plan area that could be accidentally released into the environment. Therefore, potential impacts related to commercial use of hazardous materials and potential release under the Reduced Development Alternative would be less than the less than significant impacts that would occur by the proposed Specific Plan. Overall, the risks related to hazards and hazardous materials would be similar, but less than, what would occur under the proposed Specific Plan, and would be required to comply with existing federal, state, and regional regulations. Therefore, this alternative would have fewer less than significant impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials than the proposed Specific Plan. ........ ................. .. ... Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 4-21 ESA ! D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 4. Alternatives Hydrology and Water Quality Under the Reduced Development Alternative, impacts associated with higher density development that could lead to increased levels of trash, nutrients, bacteria, pesticides, herbicides, oil and grease being washed into the storm drains would occur, although, overall, it would occur in smaller quantities due to the decreased level of development under this scenario. Impacts to water quality related to construction activities could also occur under this alternative and, again, would be less than that which would occur under the proposed Specific Plan. However, development under this alternative would be required to adhere to the same regulations as the proposed project, which includes the NPDES permitting process and the LARWQCB SUSMP requirements. In addition, this alternative would implement the streetscape improvements that would be implemented by the Specific Plan, which would increase landscaping area and pervious surfaces. Overall, this alternative would result in similar less than significant impacts related to hydrology and water quality as the proposed Specific Plan. Land Use and Planning Alternative 3, the Reduced Development Alternative, would result in 208 fewer residential units and 72,284 less non-residential square feet compared to the proposed Specific Plan. Because this alternative would allow less dense residential development near the Metrolink Station than the proposed Specific Plan, it would not maximize the potential for TOD development within the Downtown area and would be less consistent with the SCAG policies that encourage maximizing opportunities related to transit -oriented development and less dependence on the automobile. Overall, this alternative would have greater less than significant planning related consistency impacts compared to the proposed Specific Plan. Noise The Reduced Development Alternative would involve the same types of development, but with less density and intensity than the proposed Specific Plan. However, because the Downtown area is urban and developed, the development that would occur under both the proposed Specific Plan and the Reduced Development Alternative would consist of infill and redevelopment of already urban/developed areas that would result in similar construction and operation related noise impacts. Because the overall development potential would be reduced compared to the proposed Specific Plan, this would result in an incremental reduction in construction and operational noise impacts. However, noise sources would continue to be adjacent to or nearby existing sensitive receptors in the Downtown area; and therefore, would result in a significant and unavoidable construction noise impact, which is the same as what would occur by the proposed Specific Plan. The existing zoning would result in 208 fewer residential units and 72,284 fewer square feet of non-residential space than the proposed project. Thus, fewer vehicular trips would occur by the Reduced Development Alternative than by the proposed Specific Plan. As a result, less vehicular noise would be generated by this alternative than under the proposed Specific Plan, and vehicular related operational noise impacts would be less under the Reduced Development Alternative than the less than significant operational impacts that would occur by the proposed Specific Plan. Other operational impacts related to equipment, machinery, loading docks, or operation of other Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 4-22 ESA / D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 4. Alternatives facilities under this alternative would be less, as less development would occur, but similar in nature as what would occur by the proposed Specific Plan, and would result in similar less than significant impacts. Population and Housing Alternative 3, the Reduced Development Alternative, would result in 208 fewer residential units and 72,284 less non-residential square footage at build out than the proposed Specific Plan. This would result in 25 percent less population and employees than the proposed Specific Plan. The mix of jobs that would be generated by this alternative would be the same as by the proposed Specific Plan, and most of these positions would be commercial/office positions that would not require a specialized labor force, these employees would come from the surrounding area and would not result in a substantial influx of population. However, because the Reduced Development Alternative would generate less residents and employees, this alternative would result in fewer less than significant impacts related to population and housing than the proposed Specific Plan Public Services Alternative 3, the Reduced Development Alternative, would result in 208 fewer residential units and 72,284 less non-residential square footage at build out than the proposed Specific Plan. Therefore, impacts to police and fire services would be less than those of the proposed Specific Plan due to the smaller residential population that would be generated under this alternative. In addition, a smaller new student population would result under this alternative and would not place the same capacity demands on schools as the proposed Specific Plan. Therefore, this alternative would result in fewer impacts related to public services. The Reduced Development Alternative would result in fewer demands on park and recreational facilities because it would not result in as large of an additional population as the proposed Specific Plan. Therefore, this alternative would result in fewer impacts on park and recreational resources than the proposed Specific Plan. Traffic The Reduced Development Alternative would result in 208 fewer residential units and 72,284 fewer square feet of non-residential space at build out. Therefore, fewer traffic trips would be generated from this alternative than the proposed specific plan. Even though growth the Reduced Development Alternative would be less than the proposed Specific Plans, similar roadway improvements would need to be implemented as described in Mitigation Measures TRAF-I through TRAF-3. Under both scenarios operational traffic impacts would be mitigated to a less than significant level; however, the Reduced Development Alternative would result in fewer traffic -related less than significant impacts than the proposed Specific Plan due to the reduction in build out. Utilities and Service Systems Alternative 3, the Reduced Development Alternative, would develop 208 fewer residential units and 72,284 square feet less of non-residential space than the proposed Specific Plan. As described Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 4-23 ESA / D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 4. Alternatives above, the reduced density of development that would occur by this alternative would not result in the need to improve the water line on Bogart Avenue, between Clark Street and Ramona Boulevard, which is included in the proposed Specific Plan. Likewise, because the residential and worker population would not increase to the same degree under this alternative, as would occur by the proposed Specific Plan, less utility capacity would be required to serve the Downtown area at build out. In addition to water supply demands, wastewater generation and landfill capacity needs would be less than what would occur by the proposed Specific Plan. Therefore, this alternative would result in fewer less than significant impacts compared to the proposed Specific Plan. Conclusion Alternative 3, the Reduced Development Alternative, would reduce the overall increase in maximum development allowed under the proposed Specific Plan by 25 percent. Build out of the proposed Specific Plan would result in an increase of 833 residential units and 289,135 square feet of non-residential development. Alternative 3 would develop 208 fewer residential units and 72,284 less square feet of non-residential space than the proposed Specific Plan. This alternative would provide an Arts Park, active storefronts, pedestrian nodes with amenities such as street furniture, and lighting. In addition, this alternative would implement all of the circulation improvements included in the proposed Specific Plan. The environmental impacts from the Reduced Development Alternative would be less than the proposed Specific Plan in the areas of operational air quality, greenhouse gasses, hazardous materials, operational noise, population and housing, public services and recreation, transportation and traffic, and utilities. The Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative would have similar impacts related to aesthetics, construction related air quality, cultural resources, hydrology, water quality, construction noise. The Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative would have greater impacts related to land use and planning than the proposed Specific Plan. Additionally, the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative would not reduce the significant and unavoidable construction air quality and noise impacts of the proposed Specific Plan to a less than significant level. Because this alternative would require less dense residential development near the Metrolink Station compared to the proposed Specific Plan, it would not maximize the potential for TOD development within the Downtown area and would be less consistent with the SCAG policies that encourage maximizing opportunities related to TOD and less dependence on the automobile. The objectives of the proposed Specific Plan including increasing housing densities within walking distance of the Metrolink station. The Reduced Development Alternative would implement that objective; however, to a lesser degree than the proposed Specific Plan. 4.3 Environmentally Superior Alternative Table 4-4 compares the environmental impacts of the alternatives relative to the proposed project. None of the alternatives would reduce the significant and unavoidable construction related air quality and noise impacts of the proposed Specific Plan to a less than significant level, Baldwin Park TOD Specific Pl _ •-- -,- ._ ® � a�....n Project 4-24 ESA t D130593 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 4. Alternatives although significant impacts would likely be reduced in degree under both alternatives because less development would occur under each. Alternative 3, the Reduced Development Alternative, would reduce the proposed Plan's significant impacts to a greater extent because it represents the least amount of development spread over a larger area than Alternative 2, the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative. Compared to the proposed project and the alternatives analyzed in this EIR, the Reduced Development Alternative is considered the environmentally superior alternative because it would reduce project -related impacts for eight environmental issue areas and achieve the majority of project objectives. However, as described above, Alternative 3, the Reduced Development Alternative would not achieve the objectives of the Specific Plan to the same degree as the proposed Specific Plan. The reduced density and less mixed use development near the near the Metrolink Station compared to the proposed Specific Plan, would not maximize the potential for TOD development within the Downtown area and would be less consistent with the SCAG policies that encourage maximizing opportunities related to TOD and less dependence on the automobile. The objectives of the proposed Specific Plan including increasing housing densities and commercial/retail employment generating uses within walking distance of the Metrolink station. The Reduced Development Alternative would implement that objective; however, to a lesser degree than the proposed Specific Plan. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 4-25 ESA ! D130593 Draft Enaironmental Impact Report April 2015 TABLE 4-4 COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES TO PROPOSED SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 4-26 ESA / D130503 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 No Project (Build -out Reduced Reduced According to Existing Specific Development Project Impacts Zoning) Plan Area Alternative Aesthetics Less than Significant Greater Similar Similar Air Quality Significant and (construction/operation) Unavoidable/Less than Significant Similar/Less Similar/Less Similar/Less Cultural Resources Less than Significant Similar Similar Similar Greenhouse Gases Less than Significant Less Less Less Hazards and Less than Significant Similar Similar Less Hazardous Materials HydrologyM/ater Quality Less than Significant Greater Similar Similar Land Use/Planning Less than Significant Greater Greater Greater Significant and Noise Unavoidable/Less Similar/Less Similar/Less Similar/Less (construction/operation) than Significant Population/Housing Less than Significant Similar Less Less Public Services and Less than Significant Less Less Less Recreation Transportation/Traffic Less than Significant Less Similar Less Utilities/Service Less than Significant Less Less Less Systems Reduce Significant No No No Impacts? Meets Project No Mostly Mostly Objectives? Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 4-26 ESA / D130503 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 OtherCHAPTER 5 CEQA Considerations This section provides an evaluation of environmental impacts required by CEQA that are not covered within the other sections of this EIR. The other CEQA considerations include environmental effects that were found not to be significant, growth -inducing impacts, significant irreversible environmental changes that would be caused by the proposed Specific Plan, and significant and unavoidable adverse impacts. 1111111111111 111111f III The CEQA Guidelines (Sectionl5126.2(d)) requires that an EIR evaluate the growth -inducing impacts of a proposed action. Section 15126.2(d) calls for the EIR to: Discuss the way in which a proposed project could foster economic or population growth, or the construction of additional housing, either directly or indirectly, in the surrounding environment. Included in this are projects which would remove obstacles to population growth (a major expansion of a reclaimed water treatment plant might, for example, allow for more construction in service areas). Increases in the population may tax existing community service facilities, requiring construction of new facilities that could cause significant environmental effects. Also discuss the characteristic of some projects which may encourage and facilitate other activities that could significantly affect the environment, either individually or cumulatively. It must not be assumed that growth in any area is necessarily beneficial, detrimental, or of little significance to the environment. Growth inducement can occur through capital investment in new economic opportunities from both public and private entities. The nature of the resulting growth (i.e., the location, size and type of the development) is also typically the result of numerous factors including local government planning, availability of public services, natural resources, the economic conditions as well as local political and environmental concerns. Consequently, these factors can have an important role in determining the extent of a project's potential growth -inducing impacts. Growth inducement may constitute an adverse impact if the growth is not consistent with or accommodated by the land use plans and growth management plans and policies for the area affected. Local land use plans provide for land use development patterns and growth policies that allow for the orderly expansion of urban development supported by adequate urban public services, such as water supply, roadway infrastructure, sewer service, and solid waste service. A project that would induce growth (conflict with the local land use plans) could indirectly cause additional adverse environmental impacts and other public services impacts (i.e, expansion or construction of public service facilities). Additionally, significant growth impacts could also Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan fan Progect 5-1 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 5. Growth Inducement and Other CEQA Considerations occur if the project provides infrastructure or service capacity to accommodate growth levels beyond those permitted by local or regional plans and policies Thus, to assess whether a growth - inducing project would result in adverse secondary effects, it is important to assess the degree to which the growth accommodated by a project would or would not be consistent with applicable land use plans. Additionally, growth -inducing potential of a project would be considered significant if it stimulates human population growth or a population concentration above what is assumed in local and regional land us plans, or in projections made by regional planning authorities. As discussed below, this analysis evaluates whether the proposed project will directly or indirectly induce economic, population, or housing growth in the surrounding environment Direct Growth Inducing Impacts Direct growth would result if a project, for example, involves construction of new housing or commercial development. A project that is determined to be growth inducing can result in subsequent environmental effects as a result of such growth. Additionally, a project would directly induce growth if it would remove barriers to population growth such as a change to a jurisdiction's general plan and zoning ordinance, which allows new residential development to occur. The proposed Specific Plan project would result in adoption of a General Plan Amendment and changes in zoning to allow for a higher density development than currently exists and create transit -orientated development. The proposed Specific Plan would provide for increase of approximately 833 residential, which is anticipated to increase the City of Baldwin Park's population by approximately 3,665; and approximately 289,135 square feet of non-residential employment generating uses that would create 755 employment opportunities by build out of the Specific Plan in 2035. This would result in an increase in demand for fire protection and emergency response, police protection, and schools. As discussed in Section 3. 10, Public Services, the proposed Specific Plan would increase the population within the Specific Plan area over the next 20 years, requiring increased public service requirements. In addition to increasing public service requirements, which provide for employment, the Specific Plan would provide new employment opportunities to temporary construction workers, restaurant workers, commercial vendors, retail support services, and office workers. Many of these employees are already present in the region, living in Baldwin Park, surrounding cities, and in other places in the region. Most communities in region are "bedroom" communities where the majority of land is used for single-family homes, large condominium complexes, townhomes, and multi -family apartment complexes. Retail uses in the Specific Plan region are often provided in shopping malls, small shops, or along commercial corridors (such as in Baldwin Park). Additionally, commercial office space and light industry are often found in office and industrial parks or in one- to two-story buildings and an occasional high-rise building (over four stories), which are typically separated from residential areas. Therefore, due to the nature of these suburban communities' residents tend to commute to employment centers such as Los Angeles and drive to schools, parks, shopping, and entertainment. Baldwin Park TOD Specific plan Project 5-2 ESA I D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 5. Growth Inducement and Other CEQA Considerations Although the proposed Specific Plan would introduce approximately 3,665 residents to the plan area, it would not exceed the estimated projections on which the City has based plans related to provision of public services, utilities, and other amenities to maintain the current quality of life it provides its residents. The 833 additional residential units that would be generated from the proposed Specific Plan would help accommodate the additional population rather than induce population growth since the City has projected future population growth and additional service amenities to accommodate this growth. In addition, build out of the Specific Plan is anticipated to generate 755 employment opportunities that would provide a jobs -to -housing balance between the residential uses that would be implemented by the Specific Plan. Additionally, by providing for commercial and mixed use development, the proposed Specific Plan would, by itself, be able to respond to the demand for additional housing, goods, and services. As described in Section 3.9, Population and Housing, the growth anticipated by SCAG's projections can accommodate the increases in population, housing, and jobs anticipated by 2035 at full build out of the proposed Specific Plan. The population at build out is a conservative estimate because it assumes that the maximum number of residential units allowed under the Specific Plan would be constructed and that full occupancy (no vacancy) would occur. This growth could result in environmental effects, as noted throughout this EIR, including increases in traffic. However, the introduction TOD near the existing Metrolink Station would reduce the effects of growth by reducing vehicle trips and time spent commuting outside of the City or to other parts of the region for employment. Although the proposed Specific Plan project would result in growth -inducing impacts, these impacts would be self-contained, and conform to regional and local policies for sustainable growth. Indirect Growth -Inducing Impacts A project would indirectly induce growth if it would increase the capacity of infrastructure in an area in which the public service currently meets demand. Examples would be increasing the capacity of local utilities or roadway improvements beyond that needed to meet existing demand. Build out of the proposed Specific Plan would require existing six-inch water line on Bogart Avenue that runs from Clark Street to Ramona Boulevard to be upgraded to an eight -inch line. This would improve the local infrastructure that is currently serving the adjacent development and would not, for example, include construction of a transmission main that would import more water, local water treatment plant, a reservoir for the new anticipated water demand, or provide water services to unserved areas. Because the water line improvement would only enhance service to adjacent development and not provide water service to areas that are currently not served, improvement of the water line would not result in any indirect growth inducing impacts. The Specific Plan would also implement roadway improvements and pedestrian linkages to support the planned TOD, which is designed to centralize population and employment growth so that growth over time is sustainable, and does not, for example, add to sprawl or congestion on freeways or overcrowding within the City and region. These improvements do not add additional roadways, lanes, or extend roadways to areas not served by vehicular traffic, in a manner that would increase capacity, such that growth would occur. The improvements proposed by the Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 5-3 ESA / D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 5. Growth Inducement and Other CEQA Considerations Specific Plan would enhance circulation to provide for multi -modal transportation. Overall, the transportation improvements would result in less than significant indirect growth inducing impacts. 5.2 Significant Irreversible Environmental Changes CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.2(c) requires a discussion of significant irreversible environmental changes from the proposed Specific Plan should it be implemented. Project construction and operation would result in an irretrievable loss of, and irreversible commitment of, natural resources. The Specific Plan is located in an existing urbanized area, but would require the commitment of resources such as lumber and steel to construct the infill development. Development projects that would be implemented by the Specific Plan would involve construction and operation that would use fossil fuels and other natural materials, such as wood and metals. Construction and operation of infill developments would also emit pollution into the air, from construction machines and vehicles, and from vehicles traveling to and from each infill development project during operation. These developments would also consume fossil fuels (petroleum and natural gas), and electricity generated by fossil fuels and other non-renewable resources during operation. As described throughout this EIR, the Specific Plan would implement a TOD in such a manner that would reduce vehicle trips, and encourage pedestrian and bicycle circulation. In addition, development projects that would be implemented by the Specific Plan would be required to comply with federal, state, and local requirements (described within each environmental resource section), such as Title 24 requirements and low impact development requirements that would reduce the irretrievable loss of, and irreversible commitment of, natural resources. As a result, implementation of the Specific Plan would result in less than significant impacts related to significant irreversible environmental changes. 5.3 Significant Unavoidable Impacts As required by CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.2(b), an EIR must describe any significant impacts that cannot be avoided, including those impacts that can be mitigated but not reduced to a less than significant level. Section 3, Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures of this EIR describes the potential environmental impacts of the Specific Plan and recommends mitigation measures to reduce impacts, where necessary. As discussed in this EIR, implementation of the proposed Specific Plan would result in significant impacts to air quality and short-term construction related noise impacts that cannot be mitigated to less than significant levels and, therefore, are considered significant and unavoidable impacts. These unavoidable adverse impacts would require a Statement of Overriding Considerations if the proposed Specific Plan is to be approved by the City. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 5-4 ESA P 0180959 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 CHAPTER 6 Report Preparation Lead Agency City of Baldwin Park Amy L. Harbin, AICP City Planner Specific Plan Consultant Arroyo Group Jean Ward Larry Morrison Traffic and Transportation Consultant The Mobility Group Michael Bates EIR Consultants ESA Renee Escario, Project Manager Erika Lam Laura Rocha, Deputy Project Manager Jason Nielsen Arabesque Abdelwahed Kelly Ross Paige Anderson Linda Uehara Heather Dubois Terrance Wong Jack Hutchinson Metis Environmental Group Lloyd Zola, Project Director Baldwin Park TOD Specific. Plan Project 6-1 ESA t D130953 Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 Appendix A Initial Study, Notice of Preparation, NOP Mailing List, and Scoping Comments Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project ESA I D130953 Administrative Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DOWNTOWN TOD SPECIFIC PLAN INITIAL STUDY Prepared for City of Baldwin Park Community Development Department December 2014 CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DOWNTOWN TOD SPECIFIC PLAN INITIAL STUDY Prepared for December 2014 City of Baldwin Park Community Development Department 130963 TABLE OF CONTENT'S Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific P.._ ._ Ian Initial Study Page InitialStudy .................................................... Environmental Factors Potentially Affected Environmental Checklist ••. ..............s•,..... .• Aesthetics.......................................... ....... .................. ---- ....... .. Agricultural and Forest Resources .................................................... AirQuality......................................................... Biological Resources CulturalResources.......................................................................... Geology, Soils, and Seismicity.......................................................... Greenhouse Gas Emissions............................................................ Hazards and Hazardous Materials ................•.......,..........,......,.,.,... Hydrology and Water Quality ...... .............. Land Use and Land Use Planning—....— ... — ......... ........ Mineral Resources .............................................. Noise............................................................................................... Population and Housing ......................... .................. ......... ....,.,....... PublicServices............................................................................... Recreation............... ............................ Transportation and Traffic............................................................... Utilities and Service Systems.......................................................... Mandatory Findings of Significance ...................................•......•,.•... ...... .,.... 16 ,....18 ,•.,...19 .............22 .............24 ...... ,....26 .,•.,.,.....29 ..,.,,....30 32 ...................36 ..............37 37 40 ....41 ..............41 .,....42 __......45 Figures Figure 1 Regional Location...........................................,........,...........,.,,.,,,,....,,.....3 4 Figure 2 Project Location ............................. Figure 3 Existing General Plan Designations .................. .... ......... .......... .u.,,............5 6 Figure 4 Existing Zoning Designations • Figure 5 Proposed Zoning8 Figure 6 Proposed Circulation System ......................... ......... ..... ........ ....... ...10 Figure 7 Proposed Pedestrian Network .............. ... ....... .................. ,..12 Figure 8 Proposed Bicycle Network...........................,.............,..,,,....,,...........13 Tables Table 1 Change in Development Capacity from Buildout of the Proposed Specific Plan a,.7 Table 2 Summary of Specific plan Zoning and General Plan Land Use Amendments .... ,,.7 Baldwin Park Downtown .........._ TOD Specific Plan ESA / 130953 December 2014 Initial Study Baldwin ark Downtown TOD Specific Plan Initial Study 1. Project Title: 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: 4. Project Location: Downtown Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Specific Plan City of Baldwin Park Community Development Department 14403 East Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, CA 91706 Amy Harbin, City Planner (626) 813-5261 The City of Baldwin Park is located in the central San Gabriel Valley region of Los Angeles County, approximately 15 miles east of downtown Los Angeles. The City is adjacent to Interstate 605 (I-605) and the City of El Monte to the west, Interstate (I-10) and City of Industry to the south, the City of West Covina to the east and south, and City of Irwindale to the north (Figure 1; Regional Location). The Specific Plan area is approximately 115 acres in size and located in the downtown area of Baldwin Park. The Project area is centered by the Ramona Boulevard/Maine Avenue Intersection near the Baldwin Park City Hall, and the Metrolink Station that is located at the Bogart Avenue/Ramona Boulevard Intersection (Figure 2, Project Location). 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: City of Baldwin Park Community Development Department 14403 East Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, CA 91706 6. General Plan Designation(s): Neighborhood Commercial, General Commercial, General Industrial, Commercial/Industrial, Garden Multi -Family 7. Zoning Designation(s): Residential, Mixed Use, Open Space, Public Facilities (Figure 3, Existing General Plan Designations) Neighborhood Commercial (Cl), General Commercial (C2), Industrial Commercial (IC), Mixed Use 1 (MU -1), Open Space (OS), Single Family Residential (Rl), Garden Multi -Family Residential (RG) (Figure 4, Existing Zoning Designations) 8. Description of Project: The proposed Specific Plan is a City -initiated, Metro grant -funded planning document that has been prepared to provide a clear vision for development within the downtown area. The proposed Specific Plan introduces a Transit Oriented Development (TOD) pattern to the area, emphasizing development that is located within easy walking distance of a major transit stop and generally with a mix of residential, employment, retail, and complementing public uses designed for pedestrians without excluding vehicles. The proposed Specific Plan would guide future development of the downtown area to generate a walkable transit -oriented environment that is proximate to the Metrolink Station and that would provide improved access to all modes of transportation, including transit, walking and bicycling. The proposed Specific Plan identifies sites that have the potential for redevelopment, infill development, and/or adaptive reuse of existing under-utilized structures to better serve the downtown area, and proposes to rezone and amend General Plan land uses of specific parcels within the project area to provide for the TOD envisioned by the Specific Plan. Table 1 shows the change in development capacity that would result from buildout of the proposed Specific Plan. Table 2 shows the existing acreage, zoning and land uses that would be revised to by implementation of the proposed Specific Plan. The proposed zoning is illustrated in Figure 5. The development anticipated by the proposed Specific Plan would result from infill development and revitalizing development under the existing zoning designations, and guided by the Specific Plan development standards. Development standards proposed in the Specific Plan are intended to facilitate a cohesive design and a high-quality architectural and pedestrian -oriented environment by creating a continuous street frontage, pedestrian connections, and ground -floor design features that provide a visual link to the street and sidewalk. The proposed Specific Plan would allow building heights up to 50 feet high (per the MU -1 zone) and increased density/intensity of development. Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan 2ESA / 130953 Initial Study December 2014 Los Angeles County Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan Initial Study . 130953 SOURCE ty GIS, Figure 1 Regional Location In 0 is T. ro 0 O ro 0 CO 0Cl) N C: 0 - Lr) 'j- (3) a) .0 CD L - co LL o LL 0- O C: C: co C) (D Q- cn r) 0 C 0 r) ro c -0 CO m U co O_ C O O_ O U i3 ti O 7a C O a N _ C cc ro >. 7 tl E �_z3 :tf C � O m rf U .O O LL E aci U a aci o aci M C7 U C3 (.7 a o LO 0 i O r 4� co iC:-o LL g) U) N o m 'E C Co CL p d U W O cV U N C _ CD C E C ++ � � n O .X C W O F) `m a c cli m m U co O_ C O O_ O U i3 ti O 7a C O a N _ C cc ro >. 7 tl E �_z3 :tf C � O m rf U .O O LL E aci U a aci o aci M C7 U C3 (.7 a ® co c f' (n (D L a) O a) 2) r— LL a LL 7 U 6 C cU FL d o v N 0 r Y Q U 0 o W m C E L C o C 3 O Y co d C cci m LL U LL U W a 0 W N O a O w a w 2 LL O H O J = m F -O LL U n a a U h - z Cw C a O J w w a F-� w 0 z a x U a c N C O z M CO LO ID L r ~ CD O co Co N m o co cm E O cel N d c � rp d C C7 w E A U Q. Q O d Q U) a d 0 0 v 0cm c v o c -0 xN ca W H O z w z w w N 0 z J z J a J w N z LLI J i!) m0 I¢- Q C7 z z O N z ¢ J IL U W CL U) LL O a LL O m w r y v -a C. W N Cl) ccq c 0 z � C w R -t N to � C � Q d m� U � m m d y C N rA C N o to � � R V E, rca ii 4 rn c 0 " cn an E D g' D Naoi d aoi aoi m O Q O Q CD LO C14 N Oyy r0 x U) CC w x r h - N p C W m co m co to o t1 C� N 7 UC N Q O O r N O V D 'v a cEto N C N a o c E E O V o E ; W o E O E O o O p T 'E ' c U U t U Q O N N o LL t N u`> L rn c o F (7 CD z UC) W U U U U O ti .N. To support build out of the proposed Specific Plan, improvements to the existing six-inch water line on Bogart Avenue from Clark Street to Ramona Boulevard would be implemented along with circulation improvements to enhance access, circulation, and walkability within the Specific Plan area (Figure 6). The number of traffic lanes and roadway lane configurations would remain unchanged. The Specific Plan improvements related to the water line and circulation are described below, Water Line on Bogart Avenue: The existing six-inch water line on Bogart Avenue that runs from Clark Street to Ramona Boulevard would be upgraded to an eight -inch line. Ramona Boulevard: The public right-of-way areas containing diagonal parking (or parking bays) along Ramona Boulevard would be reconfigured. One row of diagonal parking comprising approximately 150 spaces would be removed, and the sidewalks would be widened. The row of diagonal parking adjacent to the buildings would remain (see discussion of parking, below). This would create a wider landscaped pedestrian walkway adjacent to the buildings and along the length of Ramona Boulevard, while retaining convenient parking adjacent to commercial land uses. Pedestrian connections would be provided across Ramona Boulevard, improving linkages from north of Ramona .Boulevard to the Metrolink Station and Morgan Park. These would include: • Intersection improvements with upgraded (wider and more visible) crosswalks; • Installation of pedestrian -friendly signal timing (including countdown timers); • Establishing and signing wayfinding routes; and • Providing a signalized midblock crossing of Ramona Boulevard between Maine Avenue and Bogart Avenue. To facilitate bicycle circulation, Ramona Boulevard would be restriped to provide a wider bicycle lane, and narrow existing traffic lanes in each direction. The existing bicycle lane is 4 -feet wide and would be expanded to 6 -feet wide. In addition, driveways onto Ramona Boulevard would be modified from the existing 45 degree angle (which encourages faster traffic) to a 90 degree angle to slow traffic. Maine Avenue, Pacific Avenue, and Sterling Way: The Specific Plan circulation improvements on Main Avenue at Pacific Avenue and Sterling Way would create a developable site and provide a location for a new civic plaza on the west side of City Hall. • The section of Maine Avenue between Pacific Avenue and Sterling Way located opposite of City Hall would be vacated. • Sterling Way would be realigned eastward at Ramona Boulevard from the current T - intersection to a four-way intersection with Cesar Chavez Drive. • A new alley would be developed at the rear of the commercial uses fronting on Ramona Boulevard between Maine Avenue and Sterling Way to maintain local access and deliveries. I-- _ ........ A —., — -- _.. Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan 9 ESA! 136953 Initial Study December 2014 m Un) co E s CDma� o LL �U) LL 65 o O 6 ci3 E U m d U 70 U U) U) D- C) O O C> Y O C 0 O Y cd 0- _C: a co m �,g r Metrolink Facilities: The Specific Plan would install full quad -gate crossings that extend across the entire street (unlike the current half gates that only extend across half the street) on Pacific Avenue west of the Metrolink Station, and on Downing Avenue east of the station. The full quad gates would improve traffic safety because their length would cross the entire track, thereby preventing vehicles from crossing the tracks while the gates are down. Pedestrian Circulation Network: A network of alleys and off-street walkways would be established to provide an additional circulation method and encourage pedestrian activity as a mode of transportation. The pedestrian circulation network would connect key places in the downtown area and provide a new mid -block walking route. The pedestrian network is shown in Figure 7 and would include: • A new mid -block connection on Ramona Boulevard between Bogart Avenue and Maine Avenue to enhance access to the Metrolink Station; • Improved sidewalks along Bogart Avenue between Pacific Avenue and Downing Avenue; • The entrance to the Metrolink Station at the intersection of Ramona Boulevard and Downing Avenue, and the track crossing of Pacific Avenue at the south end of the Metrolink Station would be improved to provide clearly defined pedestrian paths, better fencing of the tracks, and improved pedestrian control gates. • Enhanced crosswalks (including highly visible zebra crosswalk striping and/or paving); • Pedestrian -friendly signal timing (adding countdown pedestrian signals and extending the pedestrian crossing or "green" time where feasible); and • Establishing and signing wayfinding routes. Bicycle Circulation: The proposed Specific Plan would establish a bicycle circulation network, which is shown in Figure 8, and includes a combination of Class II and Class III facilities that connect downtown to adjacent neighborhoods. Ramona Boulevard would be restriped to provide a wider bicycle lane (six feet compared to the existing four -foot lanes) that would be colored for visibility, and a four -foot striped separation from the moving traffic lanes would be provided to calm traffic and enhance bicycle safety. The proposed Specific Plan includes the following bicycle routes as included in the General Plan: Baldwin Park Boulevard south of Ramona Boulevard, Sterling Way, and Pacific Avenue south of Maine Avenue. In addition, the proposed Specific Plan establishes bicycle routes on Maine Avenue, Bogart Avenue, Downing Avenue south of Ramona Boulevard, and Central Avenue. Bicycle parking facilities would be provided at numerous locations around downtown to facilitate the use of bicycles. General planned bicycle parking facility locations are shown in Figure 8, and include areas at the Metrolink Station, major bus stops, mid -block locations, and major commercial destinations. -- - - - .. �_.1 --------------------------------------------------------------- - ......... ......... ......... ......... Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan 11 ESA 1130953 Initial Study December 2014 2 O O Y Itl N 3 C E 0 B r' D •wm �. z U co C U) C W CE D- U U) ❑ D- o o O IL C 0 C 0 O Y al Q. C 0 a m m ml 0 N Y m C E �o N C cd J N Y CO ro V) ro 0 T ro 7 0 m U N O i T ro C O m T B m 0. m och gp 0- L °) a) O Q i r LL Z O U) U cl U_ C: m c ro � a O U d U a O U ❑ n O H C 0 c 0 0 Y ro d C 0 ro m Vehicle Parking: To reflect the characteristics of downtown and TOD, the following parking requirement adjustments are included in the proposed Specific Plan: • Parking requirements for commercial uses shall be 75 percent of the citywide requirement in the City Municipal Code Subchapter 153.150. Parking requirements for residential multi -family uses shall be one space per bedroom and one guest space per 10 units. In addition, the proposed Specific Plan encourages people to park once and then walk around downtown to multiple destinations. The proposed Specific Plan encourages and allows shared parking per Municipal Code Subchapter 153.150, which allows shared parking with private and public facilities with approval of a Shared Parking Report. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting. The Specific Plan area is generally surrounded by single-family residential neighborhoods to the north, south, east and west, with some multi- family residential uses interspersed throughout. Commercial uses are present to the southwest and east. 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement. Indicate whether another agency is a responsible or trustee agency.) Metrolink approvals for the pedestrian improvements at the rail crossings. Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan 14 ESA 1130953 Initial Study December 2014 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The proposed project could potentially affect the environmental factor(s) checked below. The following pages present a more detailed checklist and discussion of each environmental factor. ® Aesthetes ❑ Agriculture and Forestry Resources [0 Air Quality ❑ Biological Resources ® Cultural Resources ® Geology, Solis and Seismicity ® Greenhouse Gas Emissions Hazards and Hazardous Materials ® Hydrology and Water Quality 0 Land Use and Land Use Planning ❑ Mineral Resources ® Noise ® Population and Housing ® Public Services ® Recreation ® Transportation and Traffic ® Utilities and Service Systems Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION: (To be completed by Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial study: ❑ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case becaiise revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or [mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, no further environmental documentation is required. "gnature Date V,- ]o l limey Printed Name For aakMh Paek DowrAawn TDD Spacft Man 15 ESA 1130M kmal S", December 2014 Environmental Checklist Aesthetics Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant I arrrlatfon ac �rce+s : Impact incorporation Impact No Impact Issues �aml Supe2r"Imr inf mmm �. 1. AESTHETICS — Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ® ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Substantially damage scenic leSOUrCes, including, ❑ ❑ ❑ but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ® ❑ ❑ ❑ gw1ity of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare ® ❑ E❑ which would adversely affect daytime or nighttime views in the area? Discussion a) Potentially significant impact. Baldwin Park is an urbanized community and, as a result, views to the south, east, and west are generally of adjacent urban development and associated landscaping. However, views of the San Gabriel Mountains to the north are considered a scenic vista. The location and scale of the San Gabriel Mountains places the mountains in most northward views, often above existing buildings. Streets in the Specific Plan area that offer a north -south orientation, or even streets with east -west orientations, provide northward views, particularly at intersections, that provide views of this mountain range. The proposed project would encourage redevelopment and infill development through rezoning, which would allow new structures that could reach heights of 50 feet and result in obstruction of a scenic vista of the San Gabriel Mountains. The proposed Specific Plan would also result in changes to existing sidewalks, bicycle routes, and roadways to better facilitate pedestrian and vehicle circulation; these improvements would occur at ground level and are not expected to obscure the existing scenic vista of the San Gabriel Mountains. Therefore, impacts to scenic vistas could occur and will be further analyzed in the EIR. . b) No impact. -The-, Specific Plan area is not located within or near a designated scenic highway corridor and is not located within view of a state or federal scenic highway. The nearest Caltrans -designated Scenic Highway is a portion of SR -57 (Caltrans, 2014), located approximately nine miles east of the Specific Plan area. Thus, the project site is not visible from this highway, and the project would not result in impacts to scenic resources within view of a state scenic highway. This criterion will not require further analysis in the EIR. c) Potentially significant impact. The proposed Specific Plan would allow for redevelopment at an increased intensity; taller buildings; expanded sidewalks, bicycle lanes and bicycle parking facilities; and alterations to the existing street intersections in order to expand a TOD pattern to the Specific Plan area. New development would be located within walking distance Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan 16 ESA 1130953 December 2014 Initial Study of the existing Metrolink station and would include a mix of residential, employment, retail, and complementing public uses designed for pedestrians while also accommodating vehicular traffic. The Specific Plan would be consistent with the City 2020 General Plan goal to strengthen aesthetic character within the downtown area, and would include landscaping and beautification elements. These improvements would alter the existing character of the area. The EIR will evaluate the planned changes to determine if they would degrade the existing visual character or quality of the Specific Plan area. d) Potentially significant impact. The proposed infill development and redevelopment as well as the new pedestrian -friendly light signals and walkway lighting could potentially increase ambient or "spillover" light in the Specific Plan area. Policy 2.6 of the General Plan Land Use Element requires that the external lighting of commercial and industrial properties be confined to the site to avoid adverse impacts on adjacent land uses due to light spillover or glare. In addition, the proposed Specific Plan provides architectural, residential and balcony, commercial and mixed-use, retail, parking structure, landscaping, and street lighting standards. These standards include a prohibition against light fixtures that cause glare or reflect into upper stories of buildings. Chapter 3 of the proposed Specific Plan states that pedestrian -scaled lighting would be focused along retail streets in downtown area. Light fixtures would adhere to guidelines set forth by the Dark Sky Association to protect the area's view of stars. Light fixtures in the public right-of-way shall also follow the Southern California Edison (SCE) standards for maintenance. However, potentially significant impacts related to an increase in ambient and spillover light could occur; thus, potential impacts related to light and glare will be further evaluated in the EIR. References Caltrans. 2014. Los Angeles County Officially Designated Scenic Highway. Accessed at http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/scenic—highways/index.htm on October 22, 2014, City of Baldwin Park. 2002. General Plan. Adopted November 20, 2002. Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan 17 ESA / 130953 Initial Study December 2014 Agricultural and Forest Resources Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Issues (and Sjippoqj�q Information Sources): Irnpact incorporation lonpact No Impact 2. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST RESOURCES — In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assesstricni Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional tnor:16 to use in assessing impacts on agriculture arld farmland. In determinirig whether impacts to forest resources, Including finiberand, are sjgljIficant environmental effects, tend agencles may refer to information carnpried by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection IegardIng the state's Inventory of forest land, Including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment projeO and forest carbon measurement methodology provkIed in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or El 1:1 El Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a El 1:1 E] Williamson Act contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning El 0 E] Z of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of ❑ E] El forest land to non-forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment ❑ 0 ❑ which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? Discussion a) No impact. The entire City of Baldwin Park does not contain any Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (CDOC, 2011). Therefore, the proposed Specific Plan would not convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide importance to nonagricultural uses. The proposed Specific Plan area consists of a developed urban area that -does not contain any farmland uses. No impact related to the conversion of farmland to non-agricultural uses would occur; this issue will not be analyzed further in the EIR. b) No impact. The project area does not contain an agricultural zoning classification or land use designation and is not regulated by a Williamson Act contract (CDOC, 2013). No impact will occur as a result of the proposed Specific Plan and this issue will not be analyzed further in the EIR. c—e) No impact. The entire City of Baldwin Park is not zoned for forest land or zoned as an area designated for Timberland Protection. No impact will occur as a result of the Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan 18 ESA / 130963 Initial Study December 2014 proposed Specific Plan and this issue will not be analyzed further in the EIR (City of Baldwin Park, 2002). References California Department of Conservation (CDOC). 2013. "Los Angeles County Williamson Act Fy 2012/2013" (Map). Division of Land Resources and Protection. Accessed at ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dlrp/wa/LA_12_13_WA.pdf on October 22, 2014. CDOC. 2011. "Los Angeles County Important Farmland 2010" (Map). Division of Land Resource Protection. September 2011. Accessed at 1"l�/ 12 c,oiisry ca, ov/v/l)tib/dll ,.NTMI -I ) L20lO/loslO.iidf oii C`lctol)ei-w2 w, 2014. City of Baldwin Park. 2002. General Plan. Adopted November 20, 2002. Air Quality a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ® ❑ ❑ ❑ applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute ® ❑ ❑ ❑ substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of ❑]' any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant NE] concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial ❑ El X E number of people? Discussion a) Potentially significant impact. The City of Baldwin Park is located within the South Coast Air Basin (Basin), which consists of the urbanized areas of Los Angeles, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Orange Counties. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) monitors the Basin for pollutants and is responsible for regulating and controlling emissions, primarily from stationary sources. The Basin is currently under both federal and state non -attainment status for ozone and particulate matter smaller than 10 and 2.5 microns (PM10 and PM2,5, respectively). SCAQMD and the Southern Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan 19 ESA / 130953 Initial Study December 2014 Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant pp � g Information Sources): Impact ......and Supporting Issues ( rtin � Incorporation Impact o p . o Impact w_ m 3. AIR QUALITY — Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ® ❑ ❑ ❑ applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute ® ❑ ❑ ❑ substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of ❑]' any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant NE] concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial ❑ El X E number of people? Discussion a) Potentially significant impact. The City of Baldwin Park is located within the South Coast Air Basin (Basin), which consists of the urbanized areas of Los Angeles, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Orange Counties. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) monitors the Basin for pollutants and is responsible for regulating and controlling emissions, primarily from stationary sources. The Basin is currently under both federal and state non -attainment status for ozone and particulate matter smaller than 10 and 2.5 microns (PM10 and PM2,5, respectively). SCAQMD and the Southern Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan 19 ESA / 130953 Initial Study December 2014 California Association of Governments (SCAG) are responsible for preparing the air quality management plan (AQMP) to address federal and state Clean Air Act requirements. The AQMP details goals, policies, and programs for improving air quality in the Basin and to bring it into attainment with the national and state ambient air quality standards. The most recent AQMP was adopted by the SCAQMD Governing Board on December 12, 2012. Implementation of the proposed TOD Specific Plan would generate pollutant emissions during both construction and operation of new developments in the Specific Plan area. During construction, sources of pollutant emissions include heavy off-road equipment as well as on -road motor vehicles and workers' commutes to and from development sites. Construction activities would result in emissions of particulate matter, as well as nitrous oxides (NOx) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which are precursors to ozone formation. Additionally, because buildout of the proposed Specific Plan project would involve changes in land use intensity and traffic patterns, an increase of air pollutant emissions could occur that may result in significant impacts to air quality. Furthermore, operation of new or altered buildings could increase emissions from new area sources. Overall, the pollutant emissions associated with the proposed Specific Plan project could result in potentially significant impacts to air quality in the area, and could potentially conflict with SCAQMD's AQMP. Thus, the potential for implementation of the proposed Specific Plan to conflict with or obstruct implementation of the AQMP will be evaluated in the EIR. b) Potentially significant impact. The Basin is currently under both federal and state non - attainment status in ozone and particulate matter smaller than 10 and 2.5 microns (PM Io and PM2.5, respectively). Implementation of the proposed Specific Plan would result in pollutant emissions generated from the construction and operation of new land uses within the Specific Plan area. Construction of new developments would generally involve activities such as demolition, site preparation, grading, and building construction, which would result in fugitive dust and equipment exhaust emissions. Construction worker and delivery vehicle trips would also generate temporary pollutant emissions. These construction -related emissions could adversely affect the regional ambient air quality in the Basin and locally within Baldwin Park. Additionally, operation of the new land uses in the proposed Specific Plan area may result in increased emissions of air pollutants from new stationary sources and from vehicle trips accessing the Specific Plan area. Thus, the pollutant emissions generated from implementation of the proposed Specific Plan may violate an air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation. Therefore, this impact is considered to be potentially significant and will be analyzed in the EIR. Mitigation measures will be identified if necessary. C) Potentially significant impact. As indicated under Item 3(b), short-term construction activities and long-term operation of future developments associated with the proposed Specific Plan may generate emissions that could result in either a violation of an ambient air quality standard or contribute to an existing air quality violation. Due to the elevated Baldwin Park Downtown TOC; Spedfic Plan 20 ESA 1130953 December2014 Initial Study concentrations of air pollutants that currently occur in the Basin, when combined with other past, present, or reasonably foreseeable future projects in the area, the net increase of criteria pollutants could cumulatively contribute to the nonattainment designations of pollutants in the Basin. Thus, the EIR will evaluate the potential for the proposed Specific Plan to generate a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in nonattainment. d) Potentially significant impact. Sensitive receptors are locations where uses or activities result in increased exposure of persons more sensitive to the unhealthful effects of emissions (such as children and the elderly). Examples of land uses that can be classified as sensitive receptors include residences, schools, daycare centers, parks, recreational areas, medical facilities, rest homes, and convalescent care facilities. Sensitive receptors within the Specific Plan area include existing and proposed residential areas. Future development pursuant to implementation of the proposed Specific Plan project may expose these existing and/or new sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. The EIR will evaluate the potential for construction and operation of the future developments in the Specific Plan area to expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. e) Less than significant impact. The SCAQMD Air Quality Handbook identifies the following uses as having a potential odor issues: wastewater treatment plants, food processing plants, agricultural uses, chemical plants, composting, refineries, landfills, dairies, and fiberglass moldings, none of which are proposed within the Specific Plan. The Specific Plan proposes mixed use commercial and residential development within the project area, which do not involve the types of uses that would emit objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. In addition, odors generated by new and existing non-residential land uses in the Specific Plan area are required .to be in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402 to prevent odor nuisances on sensitive land uses. SCAQMD Rule 402, Nuisance, states: A person shall not discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property. During construction of future projects allowed under the proposed Specific Plan, emissions from construction equipment, such as diesel exhaust, and volatile organic compounds from architectural coatings and paving activities may generate odors. However, these odors would be limited and temporary; and thus, are not expected to affect a substantial number of people. Therefore, impacts relating to both operational and construction activity odors would be less than significant, and odors will not be evaluated in the EIR. Baldwin Park Downtown ..... __ ................................ ,,,,,,,. ............... ...--- -— --------........_ --------__—......--..........--- �wn TOD Specific Plan 21 ESA / 130953 Initial Study December 2014 :rte California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2013. Area Designation Maps/State and National. Available: <www.arb.ca.gov/desig/adm/adm.htm/>. Accessed November 4, 2014. South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). 2013. Final 2012 Air Quality Management Plan. February. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2013. The Greenbook Nonattainment Areas for Criteria Pollutants. Available: <http://www.epa.gov/air/oaqps/greenbk/index.html>. Accessed November 4, 2014. Biological Resources Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant TSources): Issues (and Supp Information Sources): ^ Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or Ei ❑ ❑ through habitat Illodiflcat!oilS, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or speci ak-status species In Vocal or regional plans„ policies, or regulations, or by the California rteparinnent of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian ❑ j El habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Cepartrnent of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally ❑ ❑ ❑ protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of tate Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, Ilydrerlogical interruption, or other ale, am'? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any ❑ ❑ ❑ native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) _ConOict with any local policies or ordinances wm ❑ ❑ m] protecting biological resources, snack' as a tree preselvation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict withthe visions of an adopted bitat ❑ Conservation Plan Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Discussion a) No impact. No candidate, sensitive, or special -status species have been identified within or in the vicinity of the Specific Plan area by the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) (CNDDB, 2014). The proposed Specific Plan project would plan for infill Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan 22 ESA / 130953 December2014 Initial Study development within an already highly disturbed urban environment and would not result in any direct impacts to special -status species nor involve or result in any existing habitat modifications that could indirectly result in a substantial adverse effect on any special - status species. Therefore, the proposed Specific Plan project would not result in impacts on species identified as candidate, sensitive, or special -status, and further analysis of this issue is not required in the EIR. b) No impact. Riparian habitat is lowland habitat associated with the bed and banks of a river, stream, or wash. The nearest river is the San Gabriel River, which is approximately 1.5 miles to the east of the western -most boundary of the Specific Plan area. The closest wash to the Specific Plan area is the Big Dalton Wash, which is located approximately 0. 18 mile east of the eastern -most boundary. The Big Dalton Wash is concrete -lined and channelized and, therefore, does not have riparian habitat along its banks. The Specific Plan area is located in an upland area that contains an appreciable amount of impervious surfaces (i.e., asphalt and cemented streets and parking lots and buildings) and nonnative ornamental trees, shrubs, and ground cover and, therefore, riparian habitat is not present. The proposed Specific Plan would involve infill development within an already highly disturbed urban environment and would not involve any changes or alterations to any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community. Therefore, the proposed Specific Plan project would not result in impacts on riparian habitats and this criterion does not require further analysis in the EIR. C) No impact. As discussed above, the Specific Plan area is a highly disturbed urban environment and no portion of the area contains the proper vegetation (i.e., a preponderance of hydrophytes or "water -loving" plants), soils (i.e., hydric or waterlogged soils), and hydrologic conditions (i.e., inundated either permanently or periodically or saturated during the growing season of the prevalent vegetation) to be defined a wetland according to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' (USACE) Wetlands Delineation Manual (USACE, 1987). The Big Dalton Wash (located approximately 0. 18 mile east of the Specific Plan area) may possess the proper hydrologic conditions, but because it is a concrete -lined and channelized wash, it would not likely possess any hydrophytes. Overall, because the Specific Plan area does not contain nor is located in proximity to a wetland, the proposed Specific Plan project would not have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means. Impacts would not occur and this criterion requires no further analysis in the EIR. d) No impact. The Specific Plan area is a developed urban area that does not provide for movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species, nor does it provide an established native resident or migratory wildlife corridor or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. Therefore, no impacts would result from implementation of the proposed Specific Plan and no further analysis of this issue is required in the EIR. Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan — 2.. 3 ESA 1130953 Initial Study December 2014 e) No impact. The only local policy or ordinance related to the protection of biological resources that would be applicable to the Specific Plan area is the Oak Tree Ordinance; which establishes that a person shall not cut, destroy, remove, relocate, inflict damage, or encroach into the protected zone of any tree of the oak tree genus without first obtaining a permit. However, there is only one oak tree within the Specific Plan area, which is located in Morgan Park. The proposed Specific Plan would not result in any changes in Morgan Park and would not affect the oak tree located therein. Furthermore, implementation of the proposed Specific Plan would adhere to all City and County ordinances applicable to the Specific Plan area, including the Los Angeles County Oak Tree Ordinance. As a result, the proposed Specific Plan would not conflict with any local plans or policies protecting biological resources and no impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed Specific Plan and no further analysis of this issue is required in the EIR. f) No impact. The Specific Plan area is not located within a Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan or any other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. No impact is expected and this issue will not be discussed further in the EIR. References Cotnily ol'Los Angeles. 2014. County of Los Angeles General Plan: Significant Ecological Areas atid Coastal resource Areas. Draft. April, 2014. Accessed at http://planning.lacounty.gov/assets/upl/sea/SEA adopted—Proposed_2014.pdf on October 27, 2014. California Natural Diversity Database, 2014. Cultural Resources Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than �m �Significant Mitigation Significant Issues f nd Supporimg InformationSources)... Impact Inc ration Impact No Impact .,. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES —Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains„ including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan Initial Study 24 ESA 1130953 December2014 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ® El 0 ❑ ® ❑ El ❑ 24 ESA 1130953 December2014 Discussion a) Potentially significant impact. The City of Baldwin Park was founded in 1860, when it was a part of San Gabriel Mission cattle grazing land (City of Baldwin Park, 2012). The Specific Plan area includes buildings that have the potential to be considered important historic resources. The EIR will identify any properties within the Specific Plan area that have been listed as a California Point of Historical Interest, a California Historical Landmark, California Register of Historic Places, or the National Register of Historic Places. In addition, the EIR will evaluate any other properties within the Specific Plan that have the potential to be historic and potential impacts that could occur to these properties by implementation of the proposed Specific Plan. b) Potentially significant impact. The Specific Plan area is urbanized and ground surfaces have been heavily disturbed due to previous development. Therefore, the likelihood of the discovery of surficial archaeological resources is minimal. However, the Specific Plan would result in infill and redevelopment of parcels, the construction of which could result in inadvertent damage to unknown buried archaeological deposits, which would result in a significant impact. As a result, potential impacts related to archeological resources will be evaluated in the EIR. C) Potentially significant impact. The Specific Plan area is underlain by younger Quaternary Alluvium, derived as deposits from the San Gabriel Mountains and San Gabriel River (DMG, 1998). The alluvium is unlikely to contain significant fossils. However, older Quaternary deposits or deposits of the marine Pliocene Fernando Formation may, lie below the Quaternary Alluvium; both are known to contain vertebrate fossils. Although no paleontological resources are known to exist within the Specific Plan area, there is a possibility that unknown resources may be uncovered during construction activities. Thus, the potential for the proposed Specific Plan to result in impacts to paleontological resources will be evaluated in the EIR. d) Potentially significant impact. There is no known site within the Specific Plan area that has been used for human burial purposes. Therefore, it is unlikely that human remains would be encountered during construction activities related to the proposed Specific Plan. However, previously unknown buried human remains could be inadvertently disturbed during construction activities, which would result in a significant impact. Thus, potential impacts related to human remains will be discussed in the EIR. References City of Baldwin Park. 2012. Baldwin Park Historical Museum. Accessed at http://www.baldwinpark.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=235 on October 23, 2014. Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan 25 ESA! 130953 Initial Study December 2014 Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology (DMG, 1998), Seismic Hazard Zone Reportfor the Baldwin Park 7.5 -Minute Quadrangle, Los Angeles County, California, http://gmw.consrv.ca.gov/shmp/download/evalrpt/baldp_eval.pdf, 1998. Downloaded October 30, 2014. Geology, Soils, and Seismicity Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact-yyyy Incorporation Impact No Impact 6. GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY— Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as _ delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.) ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including ❑ ❑ ❑ liquefaction? iv) Landslides? ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ® ❑ ❑ ❑ c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, ❑ ❑ ® ❑ or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in ❑ ❑ ® U Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use ❑ ❑ LEI of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are, not available for the disposal of wastewater? Discussion ai) No impact. Seismically -induced ground rupture is defined as the physical displacement of surface deposits in response to an earthquake's seismic waves. The magnitude, sense, and nature of fault rupture can vary for different faults or even along different strands of the same fault. Ground rupture is considered more likely along active faults. The Los Angeles Basin contains both active and potentially active faults, and is considered a region of high seismic activity. The Specific Plan area is not located near an Alquist- Priolo Fault Rupture Hazard Zone or other known fault, and is therefore unlikely to Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan 26 ESA / 130953 Initial Study December 2014 experience surface fault rupture. The closest active faults to the Specific Plan area are the Raymond fault, located 5.3 miles to the northeast, and the Sierra Madre fault, located 5.5 miles to the north (Jennings, 1994). Due to the distance between the Specific Plan area and the active faults, implementation of the proposed Specific Plan would not result in impacts related to rupture of a known earthquake fault. aii) Less than significant impact. As described above, the Los Angeles basin is considered a region of high seismic activity due to the numerous faults that transect the area, including the north -northeast -trending Walnut Creek Fault, the San Jose Fault, the Little Puente Hills Fault, and the Whittier Heights Fault (CDOC, 1998). The proposed Specific Plan would include development of new structures and redevelopment of existing structures to provide expanded residential and commercial uses. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Specific Plan has the potential to expose additional people and structures to strong seismic ground shaking. Ground movement during an earthquake varies depending on the overall magnitude, distance to the fault, focus of earthquake energy, and type of geologic material. The City's standard approval requirements ensure that all construction complies with the California Building Code and the City's Building Regulations established in the City's Municipal Code. Continued adherence to applicable building codes through the City's building permit process would reduce impacts related to seismic ground shaking to a less than significant level, and this issue requires no further analysis in the EIR. aiii) No impact. Liquefaction can occur as a secondary effect of seismic shaking in areas of saturated, loose, fine -to -medium grained soils where the water table is 50 feet or less below the ground surface. Seismic shaking temporarily eliminates the grain -to -grain support normally provided by the sediment grains. The waters between the grains assume the weight of the overlying material and the sudden increase in pore water pressure results in the soil losing its friction properties. The saturated material (with the frictionless properties of a liquid) will fail to support overlying structures. Liquefaction - related effects include loss of bearing strength, ground oscillations, lateral spreading, and slumping. The depth of groundwater is approximately 200 feet below the ground surface (MSGBW, 2013) and the Specific Plan area is not identified in the Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the Baldwin Park 7.5 -Minute Quadrangle as a liquefaction hazard area, (CDOC, 1999). Therefore, the potential for lateral spreading is considered very low and seismic impacts related to liquefaction from implementation of the proposed Specific Plan would not occur. aiv) No impact. The City is located on a broad, gently sloping alluvial plain that extends from the south -facing slope of Mount Bliss. Likewise, the Specific Plan area is a flat, level area with no hills or cliffs, where the risk of landslides is very low. As a result, impacts related to landslide hazards would not result from implementation of the Specific Plan. Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan 27 ESA 1130953 Initial Study December 2014 b) Potentially significant impact. The proposed Specific Plan is located within a developed urban area, and project components would be developed within areas that are largely covered with impervious surfaces. However, construction activities associated with the Specific Plan, such as roadway, sidewalk, bicycle path, water line replacement and building development components would include excavation, grading, and other soil - disturbing activities, which have the potential to result in erosion and/or topsoil loss. Therefore, this issue will be analyzed along with potential hydrology and water quality impacts in the EIR. C) Less than significant impact. As described above, the City is located on a gently sloping alluvial plain, and the Specific Plan area is a flat, level area with groundwater levels that are approximately 200 feet deep. The project area is not located in a liquefaction or earthquake -induced landslide area, and due to the flat topography and deep groundwater table, the potential for lateral spreading is also considered very low. Furthermore, alluvial plains that are not underlain by groundwater are typically not subject to subsidence or collapse. The Specific Plan area is not identified as being located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of development activities. The proposed Specific Plan would implement redevelopment of existing uses and the addition of structures. The City Municipal Code Title XV Section 150.072 requires site- specific soil investigation reports and structural observation programs to be submitted with building permit applications (ALPC, 2014). The City's standard approval requirements ensure that all construction complies with the California Building Code and the City's building regulations related to soil stability. Continued adherence to applicable building codes through the City's building permit process would result in less than significant impacts, and no further analysis will be provided in the EIR. d) Less than significant impact. The Specific Plan area is underlain by young Quaternary Alluvium, derived as deposits from the San Gabriel Mountains and San Gabriel River, which are dominated by loose to moderately dense sandy sediments (DMG, 1998), which are not typically expansive. However, some areas of development could be underlain by areas of unknown fill. Because of this the City's building permit process included in the Municipal Code requires submittal of soil investigation reports and structural observation programs (Title XV Section 150.72) (ALPC, 2014) and permits would not be issued unless soil suitability_ and appropriate construction practices for the proposed structures is confirmed. Therefore, the proposed Specific Plan would result in less than significant impacts related to expansive soils and this issue requires no further analysis in the EIR. e) No impact. The Specific Plan area is served by a sewer system; septic tanks would not be utilized by the proposed Specific Plan. All development associated with the proposed Specific Plan project would connect to and be served by the existing public sewer system for wastewater discharge and treatment. No impacts would occur as a result of the proposed Specific Plan and this issue requires no further analysis in the EIR. Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan 28 ESA / 130953 December 2014 Initial Study References American Legal Publishing Corporation (ALPC). 2014. California: Baldwin Park Code of Ordinances. Local Legislation passed through February 9, 2014. Accessed at http://www. amlegal. com/nxt/gateway. dll/California/baldwin/cityofbaldwinparkcalifornia codeofordinan?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:baldwinpark_ca on October 23, 2014. California Department of Conservation (CDOC). 1999. State of California Seismic Hazard Zones. Baldwin Park Quadrangle: Official Map. Released March 25, 1999. Accessed at http://gmw.consrv.ca.gov/shmp/download/quad/BALDWIN_PARK/maps/ozn_baldp.pdf on October 23, 2014. CDOC. 1998. Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the Baldwin Park 7.5 -Minute Quadrangle, Los Angeles County, California. Accessed at http://gmw.consrv.ca.gov/shmp/download/quad/BALDWIN_PARK/reports/baldp_eval.p df on October 23, 2014. Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology (DMG, 1998), Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the Baldwin Park 7.5 -Minute Quadrangle, Los Angeles County, California, http://gmw.consrv.ca.gov/shmp/download/evalrpt/baldp_eval.pdf, 1998. Downloaded October 30, 2014. Jennings, C.W., Fault Activity Map of California and Adjacent Areas, California Geological Survey (formerly California Division of Mines and Geology) Data Map No. 6, 1:750,000, 1994. Main San Gabriel Basin Waster Master (MSGBW, 2013), Five -Year Water Quality and Supply Plan, http://watennaster.org/Final.5YR_10_28_13_1018pm_LR.All.pdf, 2013. Downloaded October 30, 2014. National Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 2014. Web Soil Survey. Accessed at http://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx on October 23, 2014. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Issues (and Suppcarting Information SourcesJ" Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact m 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS — Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact, on the environment? b) Corifli'ct with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Baldwin Park Downtown TOO Specific Plan Initial Study ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ 0 ❑ 29 ESA / 194953 December 2014 Discussion a) Potentially significant impact. Gases that trap heat in the atmosphere are called greenhouse gases (GHGs). The major concern with GHGs is that increases in their concentrations are causing global climate change. The principal GHGs are carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N20), sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs). Construction and operation of development permitted by the proposed Specific Plan would generate GHG emissions, both directly and indirectly. Construction activities are short-term and cease to emit GHGs upon completion. Operation emissions associated with the future developments in the Specific Plan area would include GHG emissions from mobile sources (transportation), energy, water use and treatment, and waste disposal. GHG emissions generated by electricity and natural gas use by future developments are indirect GHG emissions from the energy that is produced off-site. These sources would have the potential to generate GHGs and result in a significant impact on the environment. Therefore, impacts associated with GHG emissions are potentially significant and will be evaluated in the EIR. b) Potentially significant impact. Assembly Bill (AB) 32, signed by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2006, directs the State of California to reduce statewide GHG emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2020. In accordance with AB 32, CARB developed the Climate Change Scoping Plan (Scoping Plan), which outlines how the state will achieve the necessary GHG emission reductions to achieve this goal (CARB, 2008). The increase in GHG emissions generated from construction and operation of future developments in the Specific Plan area could conflict .with the Scoping Plan's strategies as well as other local and state plans, policies, and regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing the emission of GHGs. Thus, this issue will be evaluated in the EIR. California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). 2008. CEQA & Climate Change, Evaluating and Addressing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Projects Subject to the California Environmental Quality Act. January. CARE. 2008. Climate Change Scoping Plan: A Frameworkfor Change. December. Hazards and Hazardous Materials Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan 30 ESA / 130953 December 2014 Initial Study Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant So1'c es)• Issues (arta S��lppa�thag Information 1t Impact tnt hworporation Impact No Impact 7. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS — Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ❑ II l._.! ❑ environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan 30 ESA / 130953 December 2014 Initial Study Discussion a–b) Potentially significant impact. The Specific Plan area has long been developed with a variety of urban uses. Excavation for installation of the water line, roadway improvements, and development projects that would occur by implementation of the proposed Specific Plan could unearth unknown contaminants that may be present in soil and/or groundwater from current and/or historic site usage. The potential for the proposed Specific Plan to produce significant impacts to the public during the transportation of hazards or involving the potential release of hazards will be evaluated in the EIR. C) Potentially significant impact. The Specific Plan area is within one-quarter mile of existing schools, including Baldwin Park High, Central Elementary, and Vineland Elementary. As described above, the proposed Specific Plan could result in excavation and handling of hazardous materials if unknown contaminants are found during excavation activities. Therefore, the EIR will include an identification of the schools near the Specific Plan area and evaluation of impacts related to the potential release of hazardous materials. d) Potentially significant impact. As described above, the Specific Plan area has long been developed for urban uses that could have a history of hazardous material usage or ......... — — —.... Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan 31 ESA / 130953 Initial Study December 2014 Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the 1211 El E] El environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or E] acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of F1 hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan E] E] n i or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with ❑ ® �� an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, CA injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Discussion a–b) Potentially significant impact. The Specific Plan area has long been developed with a variety of urban uses. Excavation for installation of the water line, roadway improvements, and development projects that would occur by implementation of the proposed Specific Plan could unearth unknown contaminants that may be present in soil and/or groundwater from current and/or historic site usage. The potential for the proposed Specific Plan to produce significant impacts to the public during the transportation of hazards or involving the potential release of hazards will be evaluated in the EIR. C) Potentially significant impact. The Specific Plan area is within one-quarter mile of existing schools, including Baldwin Park High, Central Elementary, and Vineland Elementary. As described above, the proposed Specific Plan could result in excavation and handling of hazardous materials if unknown contaminants are found during excavation activities. Therefore, the EIR will include an identification of the schools near the Specific Plan area and evaluation of impacts related to the potential release of hazardous materials. d) Potentially significant impact. As described above, the Specific Plan area has long been developed for urban uses that could have a history of hazardous material usage or ......... — — —.... Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan 31 ESA / 130953 Initial Study December 2014 contamination. As described above, the proposed Specific Plan could result in excavation and handling of hazardous materials if unknown contaminants are found during excavation activities, which could create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. Thus, the EIR will include a database search of federal, state, and local governmental databases to identify any hazardous material sites within the Specific Plan area and potential related impacts from implementing the proposed Specific Plan. e,f) No impact. The proposed Specific Plan area is not located within an airport land use plan or airport approach zone. The nearest airport is four miles west of the project area (the El Monte Airport). Therefore, the potential for the proposed project to result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the vicinity of an airport will not require further analysis in the EIR. g) Less than significant impact. Existing City development standards would require new development within the Specific Plan to be designed so as not to interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. Impacts would be less than significant as a result of the proposed Specific Plan and no further analysis of this criterion is required in the EIR. h) No impact. The Specific Plan area is located within an urban area that does not contain wildlands, and is not located in an area classified as a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (Cal Fire, 2012). Therefore, impacts related to wildland fires would not occur, and this issue requires no further analysis in the EIR. References Cal Fire. 2012. Los Angeles County: Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones in LRA as Recommended by Cal Fire (Map). Recommended, May 2012. Accessed at on October 24, 2014. Hydrology and Water Quality rti_ Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY — Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? Less Than Significant Potentially With Significant_ - - a ---Mitigation - Impact Incorporation Less Then Significant Impact No Impact E 107 Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan 32 ESA / 130953 December 2014 Initial Study Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or ® El El E] interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of a El site or area through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or by other means, in a manner that would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of a site ❑ UI DA El or area through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or by other means, substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed EJ EJ N the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as ❑ mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures El [:I F] Z that would impede or redirect flood flows? _, i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ® ❑ loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of 0 0 loss, injury or death involving inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? Discussion a) Potentially significant impact. Construction activities that would be implemented by the water line, roadway improvements and infill/redevelopment that would occur as proposed in the Specific Plan would disturb soils and would utilize equipment and hazardous substances that, if not properly contained, could degrade surrounding water quality. Future development within the Specific Plan area would expand residential, commercial and public uses that would increase the number of residents and the concentration of persons within the area that could increase pollutants such as pesticides, vehicle fuels and oils, and litter; all of which, if not properly contained, could degrade existing water quality. Potential impacts related to water quality standards and waste discharge requirements will be addressed in the EIR. Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan 33 ESA 1130953 Initial Study December 2014 b) Potentially significant impact. The Specific Plan area receives water services from the Valley County Water District, who also owns and maintains the water system network. Infill and redevelopment that would occur with implementation of the Specific Plan would result in population growth; thereby increasing demand on water supplies and the groundwater basin. The proposed project would add approximately 833 residential dwelling units and 289,135 square feet of commercial space to the Specific Plan area, and is, therefore required to develop a water supply assessment in accordance with State Senate Bill 610 to demonstrate that an assured water supply is available to support development of the uses proposed in the Specific Plan. The EIR will include a quantification of the water supplies needed for the proposed Specific Plan and an analysis of potential local groundwater impacts that could result. C) Potentially significant impact. According to Federal Emergency Management Agency's Flood Insurance Rate Map No. 06037C1700F, the Specific Plan area is not located in a flood zone (FEMA, 2008), and no existing surface drainages or rivers are located in the plan area. The proposed Specific Plan would implement redevelopment and infill development within an already developed and mostly paved urban area. After implementation of the project development, runoff would continue to flow over either paved or landscaped areas that would eventually be directed toward storm drains. Therefore, the potential for erosion to occur from implementation of the proposed Specific Plan would be extremely low. However, construction of certain project components would expose bare soil that could be subject to erosion, potentially resulting in a significant impact. This issue will be further discussed in the EIR. d) Less than significant impact. As stated previously, the proposed Specific Plan area is not located in a flood zone and does not contain any streams or rivers. The Specific Plan components include an expansion or reconfiguration of existing urban development in mostly paved areas; therefore, the proposed components would maintain existing drainage patterns, and will not contribute to an increase in impervious surfaces in the Specific Plan area such that increased runoff and flooding on- or offsite would result. Impacts related to flooding would be less than significant, and flooding will not be further discussed in the EIR. e) Less than significant impact. As stated previously, the Specific Plan components include an expansion or reconfiguration of existing urban development in mostly paved areas; therefore, the proposed components would maintain existing drainage patterns, and will not contribute to an increase in impervious surfaces in the Specific Plan area such that increased runoff would exceed the capacity of drainage systems. Impacts related to an increase in runoff and the capacity of drainage systems would be less than significant, and will not be further discussed in the EIR. f) Potentially significant impact. The potential water quality impacts from construction and operation of the proposed Specific Plan components will be analyzed in the EIR as described in threshold a) above. _ _ 53 Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan 34 ESA / 1309 December2014 Initial Study 8 1 � p- j W p It, -.0-1 00'� OOH 0 O O wg WfP1 w0 `)lp R� WfP 1 N 1 O I A I A C C I O@ O I p J I O O I W O M w 0 1 W 0 1'� 0 G',,. O W N R; `P w ca Nca CD 1 NNi I03 OD n V .N.� W p N` N + 0 1 007 ...Y- » . -41 0) 0) A 5 Of A OD N N 1 0 1, N I V 1 0 0 yIi$ N N I O 1 0 p P) _ NI O � 08 70j 001 O pb p'O w o W O1 .gwt7 W O W O XX PYd 0 11)1 V _ - -N ..-- to 001 W4a�'�.,.. pool 001 wqW Wp w� W, - o ^'--- ---4---l-4----4---- Ny NY W N W I IJ 00 C)N " V c 00i 0 1 A n w m m 9 O CL CD 1 O 7 n rn m F. O CL IV O N N N CO CD w O IM W ®1 O04' O®! O W I W p 1 W p w 0 1 Sro: 0 W w Wal �. g" _ n oo N y 0 to a N 1 • t0 1 rt fo 1 N Q) 1 (n W 4 1"4p V Y (JI 1 PC,)1 Q) 1 N 1 O I W I In 1 W I N 1 j A (0p 7 V 1 1 NI � 1 N1 1 0 W O� ®1'.. O 1 ®1 O 0 N I 1 C3 o 0 0 0 o I N 01 N1 V1 W1 W O AAA O p t O p 0 p 0 p 0 p w O fD 401 1T A p 6 A p A p l A p 11 1 ... 8 1 � p- j W p It, -.0-1 00'� OOH 0 O O wg WfP1 w0 `)lp R� WfP 1 N 1 O I A I A C C I O@ O I p J I O O I W O M w 0 1 W 0 1'� 0 G',,. O W N R; `P w ca Nca CD 1 NNi I03 OD n V .N.� W p N` N + 0 1 007 ...Y- » . -41 0) 0) A 5 Of A OD N N 1 0 1, N I V 1 0 0 yIi$ N N I O 1 0 p P) _ NI O � 08 70j 001 O pb p'O w o W O1 .gwt7 W O W O XX PYd 0 11)1 V _ - -N ..-- to 001 W4a�'�.,.. pool 001 wqW Wp w� W, - o ^'--- ---4---l-4----4---- Ny NY W N W I IJ 00 C)N " V c 00i 0 1 A n w m m 9 O CL CD 1 O 7 n rn m F. O CL IV O N N N CO CD w O IM W ®1 O04' O®! O W I W p 1 W p w 0 1 '401 0 1 1 -.... ..4----4 8 1 � p- j W p It, -.0-1 00'� OOH 0 O O wg WfP1 w0 `)lp R� WfP 1 N 1 O I A I A C C I O@ O I p J I O O I W O M w 0 1 W 0 1'� 0 G',,. O W N R; `P w ca Nca CD 1 NNi I03 OD n V .N.� W p N` N + 0 1 007 ...Y- » . -41 0) 0) A 5 Of A OD N N 1 0 1, N I V 1 0 0 yIi$ N N I O 1 0 p P) _ NI O � 08 70j 001 O pb p'O w o W O1 .gwt7 W O W O XX PYd 0 11)1 V _ - -N ..-- to 001 W4a�'�.,.. pool 001 wqW Wp w� W, - o ^'--- ---4---l-4----4---- Ny NY W N W I IJ 00 C)N " V c 00i 0 1 A n w m m 9 O CL CD 1 O 7 n rn m F. O CL IV O N N N CO CD w O IM O O W O o O e N co c en 9. N w C) 00 O, 3 1 CD 2{d A N 01, �,0 0< =Q; m m w.n, N « g 1 SOI �1 W3 5.3 � a 3 1 ,: 0 1 $ 1 a I , !D f0 1 1 1=O A Wol O" "w OI Wwl WON! C, J W O 01 `'� J I I o y, W 1 N 1 1 N I p l fD1 m N N A (T I AI 001 W 1 N1 �1 '1 W (n ®mb ®I pool ®r' pN wC), C, wog Wf ww m� ®wN m" OJ m OI cows@s W pl W O `P °' vl Nr 00 OI I- NI N A ®W pO ®O Ow olOb O N w W 0 @ fD of oy11y ole oN o SINIAI A{ ID Cn _ aGs K oN IY, o lI"., tlo N IV N �I W OC, OOI 0A0" C, 00 w l A w Y Op N Awl �A w mm A b w OWN N w C) t0 w l A 0 ~p W ®1 C, O N W IX1 wool W 01 ryO � A N NII O I A Wol O" "w OI Wwl WON! C, J W O cpa `'� `P p I N N ® jp o" ®wN poW OJ W C, OI cows@s W pl W O `P °' 1 OI I- NI N A ®W pO ®O Ow olOb O N w W 0 @ fD I W II k0 O O K (01 Op I osl pf N �! A ti o -4 NI j.. t0 N N N coil N Ch �{ N con O O I N NI I I OWI o w w 6 C?wN t 0 OWI o N cowl Ov o co o Oi N (P�, 1' "a rtp"pp(WOe wIwl 0� wN pwjwp w� cow w: 1 w "1 A a4 W 1 A m l f D p i o 3 �Ml M N n w Fn m 3 O Q CD O 7 n v m m 0 CL N O_ W N N 1c CD 0 NO C � 3 1,1 CL a mj m A N co r. oy o p W, w oN o .1 mN o ICD N� to r oY o r m 41, V Ii 1 #I 1 N N I >r > O r O rnN m w� w Y Or O r W 1 W 4 4 1 V. li 5 Y > i W 1 W 001 r � > Y N >N > N or a mr � �N own... N " N O " O IJ« IV CA -4 ' -4 W 1 W PD FO 1 1 W I W UA1 1 OA1 V V 1 y 1 ~1 J 10 IDI o, a J 1 V 1 W W o, o 01 O > I coo I co A " A O " O N N N ' co 0 fJ1 m m 9 O Q G CD N O 7 n N m m 9 O FL N O W N N v v CD w C) N O CA N .A d" Y, O O v0 7 I �_ CD U 01 O I A > 1 O 1 I WM 0{#{ Ni co of 1 o 1 1 I N 40 N « YO « ff W IV « W« 0~1 of ilii a CM, 01 jj w d Ad A�� �N I N m o pp w I N b� 0 CD o lili1# G I I v NC3 4 Vy N to 1 N I C � 3 1,1 CL a mj m A N co r. oy o p W, w oN o .1 mN o ICD N� to r oY o r m 41, V Ii 1 #I 1 N N I >r > O r O rnN m w� w Y Or O r W 1 W 4 4 1 V. li 5 Y > i W 1 W 001 r � > Y N >N > N or a mr � �N own... N " N O " O IJ« IV CA -4 ' -4 W 1 W PD FO 1 1 W I W UA1 1 OA1 V V 1 y 1 ~1 J 10 IDI o, a J 1 V 1 W W o, o 01 O > I coo I co A " A O " O N N N ' co 0 fJ1 m m 9 O Q G CD N O 7 n N m m 9 O FL N O W N N v v CD w C) N O CA N .A O O W I r 1 N $as rn WON # of 1 o co a N 40 N « YO « ff W IV « W« 0~1 CM, 01 jj 0 N O1 O 4 Vy N to # C 4 �Y o O 40 O W w R co f - Oo N «« N+ O" O NY 00« 0r. 0 co r N« O O C � 3 1,1 CL a mj m A N co r. oy o p W, w oN o .1 mN o ICD N� to r oY o r m 41, V Ii 1 #I 1 N N I >r > O r O rnN m w� w Y Or O r W 1 W 4 4 1 V. li 5 Y > i W 1 W 001 r � > Y N >N > N or a mr � �N own... N " N O " O IJ« IV CA -4 ' -4 W 1 W PD FO 1 1 W I W UA1 1 OA1 V V 1 y 1 ~1 J 10 IDI o, a J 1 V 1 W W o, o 01 O > I coo I co A " A O " O N N N ' co 0 fJ1 m m 9 O Q G CD N O 7 n N m m 9 O FL N O W N N v v CD w C) N O CA N .A i 0 CD 0 7 CO A 'a 0 0 0 w CL 7 rt CD ((D 0 v CL 0 0 3 a 0 c O cn (D 2 n' (D N 00 CD m CD v CD y 0 CD 0 N C N (D :v 1 v N M CD CL fu cn a n M. m CQ 0 n N m m 9 0 Q CD o' M C7 N m m 9 0 CL N O W N N N O (D 0) 0 L co N N LO O N O M r (IS O co a - N N M O N a O W W ca U C O N v O 15 W W M U � r a r I tl o o " °o �o +a , o «o rooro tlo o ;C «ocq M "N Mo YN n /% 'f% ry 1 1 d•. M O 0 � N CO M N O 10 I O I N O f1"RKra 1 1 1 t� Ni 1 1 Y a L� •C N I N�, p Q- 1�6 C N O d O N d 1 — Z G 10 p0 10 �O w W Y I r E • w� • ..� ... ! p1R� f/9 N 0) N if N O /� N iff o; CI' . co o r 6� O r ccq IN M O i N c 4- y Z V v ..f...F.. �..w,,. y:1 W 06 h c CD'nd wm L c L 0 O O :15 'U,� U 5 V o �� Z .m r d r V O co U (DLL ... o E L e C o „c d CD a W o L w N ® ° d d N Oa 0 N N M r O N O 5 w LU M U c O U) a� O LU w m U 7 Ip N N LO r O N O M ai co Q ti O N ly IT (0 N N co C) N 'O O W W N U C O > O W W M U C C C O O O U U 7 ` ` c ate+ U) C C U O O O ` U U U O O O C Z Z Z O , 1 I L) a) C O C O Z N a a F- U c c � oW > U _ .1 3 C U a L U 0 H Q Ed (6 U U N 0- U) to U Iy •O n C O N rn N m I Iv 0 CO O "O "O °O 'O "Lq 'N "L "N "r 1, (NO `r "CNO O :c) :O :O* M :v :0 :4 :N :U) RN :U) r a " u m n a « a m r w .�.,�.,....s...,......_�._.....�.a_.�_�....� m...e...�.®.aa.....»„�..,.a,,,,,,..,»...owµ.....w.�:...�..«�.,,..,,.�..�,..�,......r� .,. . O I O I O k I 9 I I I I N�0 Cl) to Cl) I� p (p (p ( Y 1 Y f0 O (O Y O In ( tf)r 0 1 0 (O 7 co 1 7 N' Cl) (. V I N LO N f.. N 1 ... P....p ...p ....r ... p ...r ...1,...,r ...� . « � ...? .. o ` o p `g cc vm «a mm rN rW rW ®'.w rw .W rW «w «w ac)r 0m o C a) f " µ C « C cm " CL °. N r.0 « o a) r x y r (a . Z r O) ro IT a O) « W Cr C « a) « d r J + a J w J z LL LLN « (yN w LLLLIN « Lu « W W ° ;:. r e a ag Y ca ca « ". ° ° N w, N ' N y N U « (✓ w V " („) LL c N 3 (meq d « « u y0+ r y r W ; u j q I L ; oua ra kn ra a N N M O N O O 2 W W_ i6 U C O U) cO G W W M U y r , u a t N m a e d Y w a m' d �N �� I aN a N (O �O 00 a W IM I f0 M � m00 "� r'7 ' O w0 " O C) r[A I O w� a 00 "� I M "ID I O u� N 00 " � X m I� ap M Nrap m q a , h a (p (O p a O O u� ec XO eN n� aN 1 LLNj NN r M wd Xp "p a XM wM XCO r.� wM u(7 .W Le.M r r N + d �.,®. m.,� ..,...,,,�,..®.... „1.,..„,,,...Q„ __�_.._.....N........n,..,N,..«,....�,..�_...N...._......�...,...,,.«N...® .�........,.�.....,....��,...4-...�...,......Q.,».,...,, .�..„M....'�"_ �..........� ,�.-.m�:.�,d �,..«...«,. N,..._®�. ,. ,«. . « N 1 N 1 N k tl 1 tl I I I tl tl 1 1 m N m N I m N m N tl NI m 1 N m 1 I N I � I I N 1 I N A N I 4 I I N I I N I N k I Y N N N 1 N I I N fl@@N I N I I I p r� N� b� I� mV; ,y 4 N ry N di N m 1 IIS 9 1 0 I N O I, N I 1m N Io I mM m (O tl� tl 1p I I N O mo I I Ip I p III 1 O) (O 1� I p m� N i p N 111 M m V I M I 1 I �} 1 0 i �? m I N m N # If? 1 0 co I N N I 1 0p p N I ti N I N V' 0? N 04 R7 f� N G SD- O y L O Cf N v N I N r I N qI N j fN0 j I, j (O 00 r Cco m # 'N m II 11 {jN rybW'� ff 1 A 1 I I tl I I N N 1 N m m INq tl I I m N N 1 I II I 1 I I tl N I N I I U 8 I I N 1 N 1 I tl I I f P 1 I IUN NN III IIN p�N 4 �. &PoN .II& .."AIA �NN� .�II1 .w.�IN �ww.y�,..yl,....�»..E...�a.. a 7Ym m ;m I m w C N(Y "w"ly- r r OC I C x 0 r C O r C r 0 I O X I N m Y a) m a m(6 a w (6 1 N r w ' (� I.. Q(_J ,( (� a W a N N w (�6 N I p 4J l a) as N N a a) tl r J2' a NIL' r I r 2� 1 R' W a N C x C C a C e C m 2- g ♦— a a I x I--- N H V" Q Q I a N N N N w. N "�` N , O " V , U a U p# r, w « m e 0 x a a 1 F— N a H a~tl V 11— w N a r D a D a� a .4 to y N . n'A a m a,� ” u ®:.,' �� i �(Q aN !_� al�� ,f w' a a a I Jd N 7 y X I M 7 U) 4 a• M X .hw.,.f...h...r...r...f...f...r...f...r...f...f...f...F...f...F...r...f. I F,r..h...fwll.r...11...f...fww 1 r x Il.r.f. a N r y I n. a r Q 1 2i 1 cG to N N x y s y , N , m m y a y m u. y'U m m cue m N N " a w C e C X C a C r C r C a C r C n W 1 N N a a s d Q Q " Q I U w U x U X U x U 1 U r U w U C C C C C C J J J J J a p x 0 e 0 s 0 O O , d d r d. x r a) . a Q) I d r a) ' (D l a) r W 1 W N aW N ryW , aW x ,WIfn I . Y a r .fn a(n aln rf_n 1� a> D I� X� xi] a� 1� I•' Y� 1� x,p X li r� .� ^� 1� '� 9tj '� a � "'b �� a n Y OD Ib N N r O N O _M r R N N M Cl N a CO G W W 1u U c O Ill O 2 W W cu U a n A A N r A,O a0 ry X«(7 X� B 5 r0 YO Xd XO a v0 Y (M 0 Y X O C! aM X� z� wl m� 'a.� v0 ..� 0 �� ra '0 X W w0 X� r� A.,N r0 aN rd' rlN AN °0 °O 0 "0 w0 r «.h n� N X� X..O a�M nM A0 a�0 a0 ap) app wpb aN aN aN aN 'N ao a� 't0 q ry �60i r� Y d. "0 w� a0 rct �iV a',M e,N ®LC) s XN X X A A M 11 1 m m k 1 W 1 N m r m 1 r 1 m I I m N I I N I N q m Y 1 I III N m 1 m W m I I i r N I I I 1 1 I m 4 I I N I 1 1 I N I r I N r N G 11 m m I I f I P U 1 m I I 1 I r B I I I r [ cq 1 c I O 1 0 INrI I N m 1 G 1 1 1°R mM '1 �t0 mN XM rd' IIID I� ImM fO m'L° rm 1 m m'M 1 1M 1��¢¢'M 0 XM a N N N IM I 1 10 N N I' 10 r( r� N IO F d. 1(O L 1 1 1 1 1 m a— m I r N N r Alr— 1 0 i h � M 4 h- m ¢ 1 0 N N I M I M I M M O 0 r0 I [� I I N ti 1 1N 1 1ti IN 1(V IN NN g N IN 1N IN I N 1N 1(O I(O II- 1 q ' m1 - N� I V I(O 1N 1 4 11,- (D N NrN r 1 IO 1 10 1 10 O N «0 IM r 10 IM r0 I m 10 �� N 10 10 1 N r m ro NM mN �rn to I� «n '1;,- I� Y� N m II I K I �a0 1 1 r 1 I r0 IM N<t V #N r0 rN 10 4 0 M I I N 1 I a r a. r I .. d 4_- i" h ' }. m � �a N 1 1 I I 1 m I I y a e e a U e U e U Y a �a ; w �;a a ;C a, O ;C w 0 ;.0 u 0 ;C e 0 C O a ai x (D N D N Ap N n0 1Y a; m A a x w a C w a C a C X C A C u 0 s c r. O n I n 0Y.. m N " W. IL' « 2' " « A N N a U U U U a C" N a` " N a`'` ' N a �7 '` m J J " y w J ; (�0 J p J v d a N N Y y a N y " N r to N y N ° u� N a y " to " t� a d " N N N " d a 0 N ' > N' "> N ' > N > ' «= X._ jrY e «'' a r X -,a- N X EL w X a n r. a R X Y6 A a X •f0 ,�, o �, A R R" R " R yY C AY i C YY Y C e « N "o W. "v R r� R R w R 'a� R" o o A R ; R Co ;� e R ;o o p tl� LL U �. p U lL 0 n� 0 ;� 0 r O a� O ;o Y. A ;'o a u p ;� a ,Q «.Q d X d 1� 'a LL LL 'a 'a n ao n a0 v ao "o ao p ,�_ p A� p a� nT Mo «o p o eo uv N C C C C n O a, 7 w C a. 7 u U) U) o Cl) X U) « R e U u co u U a R v U X R X U r, a, U a w a r r a a r « n. s o, oo -2 „ o n A 2 X 2 2 w « CM a C X C X C r C ¢ '¢ .h.a.f .f,..f...hn«. �X,«.f.. ..f...�...f...f...f...r...f...F...f...f...q....�...h...�r...f...f...f...h...r...t. # X tl, � w q X Y a e A Q. CL w. CL d A O.. X n r v e i e (D a; A m m a, (D « d A X N a W a 0 e d X O aC X> R r R a C', a R X>>RI r R a> C', A>> R m R R e> C A>> R r R e C', R R (l>y r a a w 7 w v 7 e> « X n 7 X 7 w r S a 7. 7 r 7 +> a S Y S A- X S h 0 e D a w Arj a r a a *L n� a,p ' a r$Ml'j dS] r1S a nS3 nIj ' rL r r r } "al N LO O CD ce) I 11 N w coq 0 M T) E uj E E x .2 0 0 L) 0 = 'a (D > 0 04 coq a OD N N T- O N O M r N f+0 N N M r O N O W W co U c O O m W W (d U 7 00 N N U) O N O M N N N M r O N O 5 W W U 0 c 0 C M O � ` U) d 41 Q. 0 > 0 W d W > +_+ (6 U N c N OD N N O N O M N ca 0 ti 4- 0 00 a) O7 ca O_ N N M 0 N .O 0 r - w w cu U c 0 a) 0 r> LU w M U V O ai (D 0 c O c a 0 L) Gl AR M g L O J�/ O AR C z lfff E 1 ra O i h C i i I � C Ml Z �l Ip �i Lo y l f Il% O i Re ea: -tea f ec w 0 0 10 0 C, "t C, 0 6 Ire! 1� 0 C) NN tt 0 0 N0 0 C,Lo 0 (D 40 Fj- qm C14 :Ll. C -i 2E 0 ---- ---- ---- 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 "t 0 oo C! 0 C, cc�, 6 C; 0 1-- CQ 1 (4 --------- ---- 0o 0 LO 0 0 w w 0 in O o 0 00 0 C� 0 LO (0 0 C') C� W) w C') o To —A I o 11 0 Ln oth D D soo 0c� oo c, al mm�,f o L, m La o o o o oo oc j o opQ o M c c; Lf; Lt; All o co o o lo u) o o 0 cD c* R o EA o c', o cl c; R c-� o 04 c., d, ggllN o cc:�, MIN o lo c, c o to gam/,// o o C, In 0L9) o lo oo Q o c" Q cD o o Lf; ui o--- NMI o o o o arr o crr , D/A 111 c� c� �g c, A IRS),") I . . . ............... C, o cc2 o c, on '* LD o lo oo o o c! o c; c; 9 04 04 o lo o o o q R o o c) o o lo") c, oc LD o Ln 11 (D co C4 vi l®rewl '01 o c, On o co co o k. IN q 4� 1 11 " o o c; �7 gy) CL 7 CON N N LO O N O M T- ai M ti r O r CD CD cu a N N M O N 0 w w m C 0 .` a) O 2 w w U d �u co 0 fox g /'%i ' •www�w � a.w 1 Gull e N n U 0'i a CCO x W NO �� r M r O �r { I 1 l� O, O O V N 0 x N In u f� %i/�/ o o ,o �o o ,o ao fir's o l o l l cn cy Cl) I M I� I N C BONN rr1 RAN "J" y�o rn rn + aoi rn o co ; co ; cD co n o0 I rte I c I +� v v «v iv am ' re c6 00 m Co 1.0 f"'N,e I I I I a I �S 1 / r coo Im r(D io COf o Nco � No a? M,�a�M O cc %% m w �rIF V 1a w C ID 3 .. N / U m C O ffj% f w 7 wm f/ fi U 0"v U ai (6 N > O. ly//� , O � � CL NN o NONE,1C 7 > (n <,O 7 00 N N O N O M r N r-. MP N N _M O N a 0 W W_ U c O N O r - W W m U I_ - It 0 O O co rn ID Cl) O O O ti Cl) O O O f0 N O O O 00 N 0 0 42 O 04 d V (O O O O N M M CO O C C, 0 ti N_ O 00v O of In w In 0 0 1` LO O d c W U) N W w cc A rn C a`) O c W m LO, U !+ co 00 L CD N N 04 04 v .a o MO I.o MO I. - O I 1--o O co , lo o o M I M o 1ci of , of -- --L - - - - NI N 1 N I co I 00 I '00 a Iv N 1 N 1 N I N 1 W 1 0 a 1? 1 I O I O M 1 M O , O O 1 O 1 O , O M I M O1 O O 11L O 1 1 1 1 1 o ,o M In O 10 C; to 1 o ,o M I M O 1O C; Io 1 1 1 1 oC l o b U) 0 I a 0 fV N 1 1co 1 N co N 1 N o Io 1 1 N I o M 1 M o I O 0 ;cy, 1 O 1 O o Io v my gym:: �a �E z ,z)� 0 7 00 N N to CD N O co O a -r N ti 0 M N (0 d N N M C) N a cO C w LU m U c O (`V O W LU m U Nn m 0 R Z N C J W N C u co01- N :10 e 1 M 0 e M N !h I N rvN r N N 6 V '" T r ID w 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 O m0 jo0 I(DOI v Nrn f,N 10 al �D O II 1 O O f O O IN O O !V O O d:J, O O M I,., M O N d. 00 I YY I M O M O O C O N O 10 1M pp pN r 4� N''.v N N a 1I kms. d d ti0 Ir0i0 ho0 II Q @vo do a0 tiO OO I �WNO MO Oi 10. I rn Ni 1 N. 0) coN� O N o �o O w N I n U) N N 1 1, N ti I I v "!? I� O M- w 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 O m0 jo0 I(DOI v Nrn f,N 10 al �D O II 1 O O f O O IN O N rn I m I N. 00 1 0, ��N 1 tom. W ati 1 14 N m 10 1M 1m r 4� N''.v 1� 0 a 1I kms. O w 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 O m0 jo0 I(DOI v Nrn f,N 10 al �D O II 1 O O f O O IN O 010 0 G.] 00 IOo W 0 a IOoO, t o m 1 0, M �0 1 tom. W ati 1 14 1" ' N II O 1 0 1 0 1I kms. O 1 M 1N 001 coN� O N o �o O 1 �0 ppu, y 0 1110 M 0 yO O M l M I O M I O M- a Oa O p0 j0 {00D0 N OI W O O h WO 1M 10 IN 1� Iti m 1.CD7 N 1a 1 1I 1n0'• a V ci NO" l0 10 N ID I fD I r' 1 1D Y M A M i t p 1 1D 1 1 N r rn y v r'�j 2 U rn r E m U E's b •� r LL 1 c q O V n 3 „0 r N q 0 7 00 N N LO r 0 0 M r N N M_ 0 N a O w w M U 0- 0 O 2 w W ca U 1d 2 b n M � r N M q N N N N ti °r a Lf; a rV O N 0 M 0 ----r ---- r ---- r» -»-r---- ei) I dl ry k - 0v l0v 05 Nov Nov t O N O W tl O O M 0 0 00 —o r�0 ro09 I0O I.00 ti0 r 0o N Wtio &1.- loo IN �o ao 00 - N 1 O O O O I7O o 6 N 0M t0 M N0 v 00 10M q'0 M OM 00 a00 0 N'N0 1p01�0 N 1N0 M0 .N N »I OD I M N Oi O N U) N OD N-_m0� I N N O OD N co oo N N I M O 01 1 O LO O O N O N 1- ' V Cl) N 0 U) « ® (O tl Cl! G 0 a in d M 0 1 v) 1 1n O r ',,. m m1 NN I N 10 IN h_ NW N ti a iv I:° 1� a __.iL.__.L____L..._I»_... esti 7 w dErn �U '� rV O N 0 M 0 ----r ---- r ---- r» -»-r---- ei) I dl ry k - 0v l0v 05 Nov Nov t O N O W tl O O M 0 0 9 I co) I M 1 0 0 W O W tl 0 M I O M CR too I�0N� 0 I'-0 c O IO O N 1 O O O O I7O o G N d) ! ... �.� .. ».. M N p M M I p M N I p M IID ar00 N00 tl'. f000 N0 N ;0 G a Noi [N OM 10o IOM N� Non �0 t,O Z0 rV O N 0 M 0 ----r ---- r ---- r» -»-r---- ei) I dl ry k - 0v l0v 05 Nov Nov Dov il'N0 OM C,M t�0 W� W�0 (V SNo I OD N,. C) N 11. ao Im Nv W 9 N Aia 1 m O IO Nc" O N O O O O I7O o G ... �.� .. ».. W M �O 1 IID 111 O �.5 NO M -'--r ---- r-_ 4 ....... OM 10o IOM N� Non �0 t,O Z0 1 O LO O O N O N 1- ' V Cl) N 0 U) « ® (O tl Cl! G 0 a in d M d. 00 c °° d M 1 v) 1 1n O r d 0 d 1 0 esti 7 w dErn �U '� E 7 to ' O •j li ' y p c p O h U' > 0 r N n �j m w C= tN p w w� �Q 00 00 1G N N 1 m ro 00 Rm N �jiii o to o to (D _ 10 a "��of // a ' 0 t �/ ii N ' N eo co ��� M 1 M CA D) ' OI ",,0cl) Ci j, - to tm t�� /i coCL co Iw Sam I1ll ���i�i co 1(0 M' M c IM i ti t t� N---f0.._ I �r 1 C. M Il' / , 00 t 00 00 0 /�JVIU jt rn im f M w yi (D t CD o er�1lf ��� �oia�i CIS (6 i c q 0 of 2 cu U M d m 16. N C cc � 4„Y 0 O d,o by ivy lao e N N # 1� co10 M # 1 # o ® ® d V «N v -r.-j- o 1 o � I �O I #0 1 0 M �o Im - m Np o N o"C"•a,Lw, A(D o M I® #� (V i� #O h iv® V a I # , N 100 D1 N jOMCDCi p 0 cq O # ® ak Y0 1 0 f Pd IM ti N O 1p #.N 1I O O � O N #(a 1 � � 3 6 ro� ui to Icl) cl a O a N N rovOCL � �I N to N o CD w N Cl! r N a, 4„Y 0 O d,o by ivy lao Xo O M iD # 1� co10 M # 1 # o No -r.-j- m � I �O M �o Im - m Np o N o"C"•a,Lw, A(D o M I® #� 1� �o iC 0 o - O I # p d7 M 0D O 100 D1 N jOMCDCi p 0 cq O # ® I ti tl!o aai 1p o No -r.-j- m q W �O M Im m # 1 0 C; 1� �o iC 0 o r k N «'0 0 IT #w It CD v Na tl!o aai !; 1 � � 3 6 ro� rovOCL � rvJ N N O O ID N // / O r 0 � r� A prp v� 00 p /i c N e ii/ ln % �w 0 0 p lawn N G ONa �0 n _ o 1 h o ao cu 0 g�/� I o rn!oIolm Cl) ti IN OI I ...I � a ����i/ j jf 10 Cl) IO INco i M N M �fi; c " // / N N Ch IN N N M_ O N 0 2 w w m U c 0 v 0 2 W w cu U Cd m o j o I rn 10, 0 O N O N N NCO IM NI I I l0 O I O I� I I pM 10 o O NC, N O 0---� o-, O I N A p co to �,rp M ., .. .41-__- NI I I M NN I I O o O �O O I N A p co to �,rp M o O n r CD 0 — ti I� jI:: I SIM WO I O IMOI- Cf 0pO OOC4II1— 1O (O ---A--p....h--- ' ItD I . NI I I M NN I I 0 Co I0o n CD 0 i ID I� jI:: I SIM } O O h UN CD I0 I/v ItD I ov No c " E rn a co v J co O C o U A ab rn 0) chCL 0 m a g g is p f p 1 D O O L) 12 /� O r O r U) O / O 1` ti 0p Op s (3;rl%if r a 00 N N T N O M N M 0 ti T O T N 0) d N N M T O N O W W m U c O N O W W (0 U 7 M In O N O M r N (0 N cV C) O N O w w C O O r> w w m U 9 L N 1 w " -� 1 F^.._..,..1.,.....�_.y...._...�, ' " .. ,. I I w O " C C O 'o I C oi� . d C A "N W EN C "ti +C ,-c Ih t " C ". N � N 1 7 1 - - 1 1 p N pII T- 1 1 1I M r i L � L q U0 1 �C ao 1 � p C m M o N C 0 , 00 10 , 10 , l0 100 C O I 1 1 er�r/''//��JJ//' 1' l� 1 1 I 1 1 1 0 tie lC 0 'N d L !,, • J I Y L j •C 1 1 1 CL C �j 9µ y , N , N N Q N B c, C I C ,o 1 0 C." 10 ,o 0 o d O Z v �j � 1 1 1 „ I // N o gg /l N 1 i IN o 1- , 0 00 , ICS- { °° .o o �N eco d C C Z 1. l ...r P �c N .O U Ma d o a cc cq CD n, d �+ ^ rn UJ o c� 14 N CD E p ;' U) v O '+ CL a)c o d c a1 CTL ` la rs SE Cm C14� T- a rn M d' LO r O N O M r N N M O N O W LLJ m U C O O 2 LL.I w m U N ? co U CU m .a U C F O N � O_ N N U C 0 a Z C O N N Cc L m d m � i O O U U 3 a N C C O U b k 9 a "O "O "M "� cq 00 w O rv.. O s w a m i w ii i r a w i O l o 1 o i 1 1 1 I 1 O 10 10 10 I0 Im to N0 ICO WN O I 1 YY IIM 1� O O 1LO �O O O IN O 10 Ico N I N O CD N I N K , o i5 N . �� N , p1 an f3) u O " CD a) F1 C w {q [A ca cu cun co r N. N n N C xm = Y w 0 r - F- d O C � M � O U r N 0 o LL Q LLI W� r LU LU O N C ...f...f..,.t.w.t...f...r...f.w.h.«nta wrw. w m , " N N N o o o r t �. Q C ; y , y U w U_ f V r U ud w y r n N r a n •j a) ° m " 0 m O W� 'Z nD 7 `O (n N D r C r , C ; C "-0 U r U w U a) e 0 . ca y r J m " C6 , J n Co . O co "' L " .0 w L r C r ,. ' O a r "� O T0- "6 N O N to � O a) U U) ° E U F Q N aa) CL m C m ` N U 5 7 a) :3 O U O a) 'U � a) N N O U C O � > CL U N O O U n. O C a) C N U a)C_ '6 (1)U �-.r Q U m U a C U O O C (4 m a) Ui C O C '13 OU .20 U O Q 7 CO � O C O a O a) co C O a) C p p 2 O a) m O U l U d) O m -6 m m O m Q C OC '�C—+ N N m C E C m0 CO ca O i O c C C Z (Dm m m C »� o > to a) 1 a) O ac m rn :«_m •' rn w > N -Dp) C_0 = +. O c •r F O = m m m a) N T Q O H Q i3: W 3: U Q w zi 3: b k 9 a "O "O "M "� cq 00 w O rv.. O s w a m i w ii i r a w i O l o 1 o i 1 1 1 I 1 O 10 10 10 I0 Im to N0 ICO WN O I 1 YY IIM 1� O O 1LO �O O O IN O 10 Ico N I N O CD N I N K , o i5 . �� , p1 an f3) u O " CD F1 C w {q [A ca cu cun co r N. N n N , SAT xm = w 0 r d c0 0 o LL LL LLI W� r LU LU ...f...f..,.t.w.t...f...r...f.w.h.«nta wrw. w , " N N o o o o r t �. , « ; y , y U w U_ f V r U ud w y r n N r a n •j co ° m " 0 m O W� 'Z nD 7 `O xW D r C r , C ; C "-0 U r U w U f U e 0 . ca y r J , C6 w ea w CO , J r J n J " C6 , J n Co . O .0 "' L " .0 w L r C r ,. ' O a r "� (D O M d) m CL N N M O N O 2 w w m U c O a) O w w m U « « r w « b «ti «. " (O m ti d N «� M ro f�0 r� n N «� V r (�O, r M N a m I « «q «� «.. U «U u� CD W O 00 M y M e® Y 6 a w " O ° u r « " ('7 ° b (O « 6i « (co « M Y V , f0 « d(D « M « W «� It - « m « W N I b X «. N X r rc M M 4 X 1 r I I Y M Y I It I N I I 1 d I I I d 1 0 i l 1 tl 1 1 0 «00 W� I� NO) I(D Io N %� I I IIN I EN N IM 1�6� Ip 1N 100 Io0 1OD N 1� IC N It` 1� 1 IN 11r IM 1C 1�. I� I I� II XO IN I 1� N00 1(D Ip k0 NI,,. I� M 1 W i 16 I f0 d 4? I a- # N U 1 0? 1 & ti I N 1 1 p N X p rp> M 1� f Nti log I I(D tl I t• �'� IN NLO 1 N 1(p IO IM p I I(D N N(p N� P.N 1 Iti I I� Iti " M �. I 1 N gWO I I I Y I I I I I I A NIt III 1 I N N' I I N b & I I I I I 4 I " 1 1 tl 1. I 1 I 6 I F. � 1 I 9i 1 I i G fC gRg 1 I I m I I N W 1 I F Po N I 1 I V N N I qi I I R ..r...;...«.r...�r®..�a...n.w,MvX.«.�,....... ... .w., r w....,' ..4 4....:4..4.,.,4...r.F....,... wd « e N r m M (6 W. m , N 1`y X O e O • O F. O X O + pl « pl « pl ' } r J « «x x �,fY fY fY x X O •V-. X O ' •V.. N w 0 N e N ID v N r O MJ IJ X0' tDY Mcr «W Iw rQ' dfY Xx IIY I— I— h �' I— " N « O N . O C X C (D e C d) C M C a� X C n CL X a d I M N I r X w g w N X l r I I B N F '.o X "o M a "o a" a X Y b " X «m «� «t «I- wr X� �- al— ,D wD r� X� X� >o «o «� «� '� « N r N e O N r r N M C W "U) "(D r(A «U) wU) «U) rU) rU) "V) XU) +> d?y "> "> d?y «O «O «O «O X'00 M (D CID co CID «� ; «":O «a "O X O 1 0 « O « 0 d e X U) ": Cl) 1 U) X U) « ...f...f...f...f...f r ... f ... f ... « h ... r ... r ... h ... h...f...r...t...f...h..«p « ...f...f...f...h...f...t...F...r...� « .. U •� M "w i- I- . I- r r X I « tl Fg . r� Mg Xn C C o_ Xg c y o. r Xn Xg g. Wd C n .9. y dg bn rn Fa X®. g « « m m ; m « 'CO. «N «F`- 1- «H «♦` «E f- «N «N «I- «H « a� « a� « a� a� � e M e r r a� X m X d a� M m X m e m X a� X °� " m �"�cc L «� r� +�� «�o QC, N � N �� � ev r� ro � r� Xv ro d� r2 «� to Wo 6 0 w U) o X d W ,e d. O r 0 M O L X O t ,(� w 0 Y L X (D F. g d 0 r L M O) r L r 0 X t I N X O) r 0 r 1U ID U« ". � « e. fn b l ' «ID � « tl 7 rn M It LO r O N O M N m 0 N N M 0 N O w W ca U C 0 a) 0 2E W W m U r ` a tl "� « � X w f a «M « (p a r "4 X «C6 a gin. r f� .M e f. x N f Qj X� « r " • " x " " " O O 0 »� 0 "� a 0 C7 u N 0 «� _ C' O » O O ' O O 'O O ' O O °O O y0 O ''O O O O "O a0 a. p a� r erj rm r (OO tl (A aN "N aN �N "N « ar rN "O tl� C') N r.� XO X «O r0 ,O ,O «O ,O ,O p Y� , Na « N tl C'9 r N a.. x � INN I II I U U U 9 I U II N N I!4pl I I I I N f I II 1 I Y i 4 I I U U N N IE I N I # If I m I I I I m I I N U 1 I 1 I U N I U U V N I I I 1 & I N U I I M # O 1 N N ap N O I(q U U N M I U I ti N I t` 1 p I Cp o ft o N 1 I I I I 4' I jj f0 tl q I U 1 N rM.. N O O I� P� 4 p U Cq U O U� Ifl M M M I M L M f M 1 0 U C, U' O � O X N U N 1 h4 p N I N l I. m Y 1 `— I M yy M W M f M I M I 9 1 0 pOj r °� tlN N U"a4 �gN I'N 1` O LO io, 1 N N 1� # O IV Po O p tlwd M O O U`- U V � CO �O io N( IO IO IN N k� , M" 1.. C»7 N I N 11 i� U N 9 A I N y U I I ggqQ I I N I N I I N 6 I N tl F I m Iw I I i U I I N 1 N I I U 4 I I P U i U 9 l N b k C ' C ' C ' C X U f U e U f X U N , N , N , ,. N w. , EL , a , a ,a ,CL «. X y X y f In X y , y « f 0 " w tl " "n 0 f 0 0 f 0 X O f 0 O r C9d ` CPF C6U RC9 a 93k " IU e N ` CO N U n n 4k7ti r CIO , , 01 , O7 0I ",.. * y h tl N N r rtY ,` 4d a` U T eft w rr N' J f 0 ' J f 0 ' J e 0 ' J X O J w 0 « N9 " X eaM " X aA , tl rn « N y r r ' r3:M ^ N ' u! « fU O [1 Y> X> '(0 e> X> ,!o •fa "' G W 9 M ' 0 w " D e w? « O w " uA r. r (U r f Y e .L « Y o Y a, Y C w r 0 , U (6 '—'tl. N e .. O tl j « c CCC a c co 269 « c e6 c eD u� U r o Z . > o._ X .�,� v '-coi �: n=� w ,a e6 .a,?y M e6 ,« « a, a ; "- ?.1 e tl .u.� ,a, , a, n a (D a a tl ,a r a a.r m c�i s 2a o o n n « o » a a� tl a tL tlco X L e LL X a O r , o r , o a a o r o X L o» o + o tl n �P o,« cu a Z E+ o« o m m m m o' (l7 r w z«« o X c9 X V X v X o w, CO's a; 0 a e� Xa e . :o x :.02 o Xo o 2 «o cu a cc Q ca cc m .f...h...r..4...f...f...r...h...f...� ...r...r...f...r...t...f...}...r...f...� a ...f...r...r.. Y e w "' e > a > a) ' N X > > (U f N X N f (? * N a CD r (U « N f N » N a (U a N Y N f u) « d a 0 N a. (U (U (U e O O , O O , , , « p X x X tl w « tl f x « co X m n a 7 f f N n N X N f N >� >cu> >>� >�> >>� >�> 77m >>� >� >c >16 0 a 0 e 0 f 0 D X B «3 X : « : w 2] , tl V N M a rn M d' LO O N O M N M M C) ,7i O LO N M d N N M O N .6 O 5 W W m U O .N N O LU w m U J R ¥ U) Q ƒ 2 2 @ q n k 2 15 & ± 2 2 C) c @ B � � ¥ ■ � $ O 9 k � k & @ L > - Q . d q B C4 M U) r O N O M N (O 4- O N M (d d N N M TIO N 0 O 2 w w U c 0 O w W (0 U u O d L CL C CL a. d N cm c F3 cc C9 0 d V .z+ O d cc L CL tm c 'a E C7 c 0 d V a 0 c a 0 V 2 CO) U) co Ca O���' 0 7 r r: d 7V C O Z �y �f 4 Ln ` o.. Ln 4MJ J: o O r N C ��l v ~ r r: 4 N O rd fflc d n d �f U O' O' N w %SI` r c, aff N i O O 'a U 7 rn M r O N O M r O m 0 CO r 0 00 N D) m d N N M O ~ N r' O O N 2 W C W U p 0 0 7 > v o +�+ 2 t W V W �- a U N M rn M d' lA r O N O M V- N N N N CM r O N a O 2 W W (0 U C O n W W U a N M 5 n M O N_ O M r (13 Q M O O C6 N N M C) N O W W ca U 0 N W W [6 U 41) m m m 'm m Ym I a II e u 1 r Mtl M co tl co N 1 N � U �2 m II �2 n U N m 1 m o N O m N m N � rro r w m fm N o to I N I N tl' rn Wrn U m A r� I Ido fo N I, Yn V 17 O N, O N � N m Iti m 1 m co co I K) I W ~ I~ 'o �o I � ti Iti I ti Iti ti I N m I m M I M 1 1 OMO I Mm I � 1 � I N 1 N W 1 W I O 1 O M I M I W 1 � m , m 1 eD 1 I M � M r � v � N r N m r OI oY a Y'� 1 C N N r N O n d r M Y O " (Ower tiX�'(O MYN"b w. et Y0 Y Y 4 • YY Y eY � .Y ..Y m O n b b N Y N ,MYN r O M,�,M,O Yd. (D,0 C6 N ' (o r op" ,O N r(D m;(;N"M"r- M M ° co R I tl °�VrCokclU) co Ci 4 co C-4 OIMIN@M I Y R Y r 1 I 1 W I I 1 U I I 1 Y I I b 1 4 I N I co �1l�r�r 0 L W co (Q rn I(o 1 U I o 1 M 1;.0 co M.; cd I 1 U 1 1 1 N 1 I I X 1 ® N .cl • 7 O " (o ° FI)E —E2 £SU C r 0). In 0 O Cl) Lo LD M lD O M W Lo M (D N LqM rg M 4 r co YLn r r w Y " r V ..YYYa..w..e. W b Y Y a b M O O n o . O M, O M1 O O �. O O e M n O , b + D) N N p p ' OLq co d' co Yti Y(D 1 I I O O O i 0 Y O N I O 1 0 I lO Y M O 10 IM Ic '(D V I LI) I M I b'o'b'O'b 0)'0) -0)'0) 1 I r I I U I 1 R D0) C Y 0 Lo i co W i 00 ' OD 1 1 1 1 1 l I fl' ly O I O 1 0 U O Y O r- 1 M I (D r (D Y (D 73 1 1 I I I Y . C • •�•� IF - a) .O .o . N e C E`o;m�b co CL ; N • C L .2 . W M LO T- 0 O N O M cu 0 4- O r r ca IL N N M CDN a O 2 W W (d U C O O W W co U O 0 0 0 O O O 0 h M M O O O !T O Cl) 0 0 0 h U) fD v O O (O O O O Lf) Cl) h O O O O O N r O F c, 0 L �R a) d to O C) 00 �1 W O ,,, Qi ii N N F- a) U W co U) to N CO ANN r N f0 � (O I I N 1 N 1 � G 1 0 1 aD 1 N I r o Ic 1 m1 Ip 40 A N N I lc (s ll'--- teto �_ --r_. 1 O 1 O co 04 N 110 cc 10 1 (O I r 10 rn 1 N M o to 1 n ,rn O 1 N M I O 1 0 1 1 1 1 W 1 N M 1 a C l o 1 1 W I N M 1 � O 1 0 1 1 1 1L o) M M 1 co O 1 0 0 1 0 n jN N 1 V: I fo Cl) 1 Cl) 1 1 M I r o la N 1 N 1 1 to In 1 to o 10 m� '; m c z z 0-7 7 rn M r O N O M (D T - 4C N r N V) m CL N N (' Cl N a+ 'a (0 O Z 2 , W d W N U V c � O � A W d W lJ U N Le; m 7 a) M d' U') 0 N O M r rIW (0 r O M r co m N N M_ O N a O 2 W w m U c O Nv O 2 W W (CS U Lc; M CD G)Op u W ti N m X'0 I M 0) OD N00 I O I M N LO f0 r wM I N ID O M 6 M I n O C, M M O p V t - b p N; O D p O Cc, O t- v- o 00 ®0 X00 Wo 00 0 CR Lf)_ M_ OM1 p0 N 00 U` pr�i Iriur LO LO co � : SLf) am N O N C I I N w Ci r--_-�___ OD CD CD �}M N 00 Ih III M ul Ci �. ui N a Ia t II co M .. I{{ cu,))Cq w w OM aOM N N N OOy YO O O i 0 I N N O O I Of � p O p I N N co O I r M O b O M ## 7 �. 00 N ) 10 I V n 0 f0�0 I Do II N IVNo j M M ... .. It mO �0-- O_ O _.___.;.._... O ti O M �lr0 OM O p N N I O M b j i 7 M co M 4" O IIIp II ai O M p ygg' 4 00 LV P p M ®p 0 ���OM ,4 Cq a,® "� r M lwi C 0 O _ Iti Nb �m _.___.;.._... N,. .._.------r---_ O V I'p�I.pd. 0Oo I'N0 N� 100 I � Ib N'ri 4� 4" IIIp R m a0 M p ygg' N'N LV o 1-. ._-r---_r-_-.t t.._ b Iro 00 IN o �o MO N �rn Nw C', �w- Iti Nb �m o I C I (V Y 0 y r ---- O M kOM I 4 NO 4'r�op C', I..�p IN N dui fb ip Np M1 0 w 1 h 1O 4 1 y N 1 NN 1 r 1 W Ir (TF 90Ito 'w'1" I In X M I I N -L- -.Y. -�--- L - - -- ryryq 3 w F> I r EW C w C m wI°Y 2' �. a "'P �: a M O N 00 a Cl) cq M N 0 h m V d 7 R Cd C 0 ip Ccm C r t0 O a) W (a C N fn C O Z U O O J N rn D G a rn M d' LO r 0 N O M r N N 0 N N M C) N cO G w w U c O Q% cO G w W ca U n� M M o l t0 a' m N co r� a) r co N N h O N C r r N N Ir a Iv C, /o 1 m i coo, mm INo N N I V) m N Cl) W O 00 0,1 m O Cl! N r M I � L r r� 0 0 O co N .,._....,..41 .. . 1 OD O 1m � 1 N 1 C) M 1 - 1 00 1 1 I 1 1 1 ti 1� � IN � I N � 1 � 1 1` 1 OOi � 1 N 7 1 N � 1 � 1 1 1 1 0 o IFC, ti 11: Cl) ,m Cl) 1 Cl) cli N to 1:� 1 co 1OD 1 N 1 01 1� O 1 tt) fK3 1 O X7 1 M m (I 1 1 rn 1 N V Ol0� q co !74 C4 0 0 I -0 N ccloi tiro Cl) C4 N o > 0 C; Clt q,ODti a. 4 - - - 0 o C, 0 C,4 to D M II M LO ED M C4 to Ch CD ClOD CO / 1 0 q o cn Ci 0 It 0 ,7 Do (D C, 10 C, ob ; VMMI�ellf / a O C5 co MRR 2"', All I I'M C', LO C:� 'n C, C', - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - C, O !74 C4 0 0 I -0 N ccloi tiro Cl) 0 C� N o 0 C; 4 - - - 0 o C, 0 lco ce) C', R 0 D 01 O 0 0 10 0 tiro Cl) I— 00 N o C; 0 o C, 0 lco ce) C', R 1o iCi t- m U) O co N N M r O N O W W m U c O = O > M O d LU > m o U C T- w c N CD I 7 Q n O MD 7 90 Z O b C v i11 =0 c 0 c o— m cr N T.O �� =r r. O ,.y 0 O m N N + 1.1, �a r G)e 3 V O o fD " o, �; ID; D 3 �• cn O a r M rv� e e N a W CO C y, ray, 0 w ° f7 r CD C) c cr v n E; c n" ri CWp CD = �1 e d . y c1 cn 3 ID CD c a a m n o cD , 3 = w N m rt .......... ;... n n o In Q0 34kCL =r a n (D4 rn 41 3 co v yr W Ne N O N N co I 1 1 p w r i I I Mi 1 1 1 1 1 W 1 4 I N 1 Y 1 M M 1 1 r I r r v O I O I O I O I N u 1 "Z N O ol m o y1 as yr Ino 1' c o Q O 3C 011 C G M R ID O ! 1 W I 3 .dam► 1 p 1 N 071 O II 1 u X I 1 r 1 CD 1 1 N I I v I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 O M � 1 I I I I I O O0 O CY) j 0) i O j I O j 1 O 1 CPI cn .. N O W W W I I f I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 CA 1 I 1 I I I i I I AA' Is 4 ) �� e O, 41 W SIM , C:�J) � e CC) I p e ? CO O C) o � I 00• O " o" of or o0 d 0 M O r O: O N CTI s r 01 CL c N 91) U3 0 0. (D n rm.r n 0 N� 0 N n v Fn m 0 CL G CD W 0 7 w Fn m 9 0 Q N o_ W N N i a W M x o Q Q Q, 0 =r: =, W O M a FM m M F m+ Fr m FM m" F» m +' �P P M n; a a. n n: » r m; cN cM cP c: c, ON sv; C P N P N, N, N N N M : P 0 CD' . a.... 4... 0 a. , . a... a...... �... a... a. . �.. . M • m * -n ,, IZ C o IM V I (Lni w o 0 or o a o a 5,n Z � m N CD N n� CD a U2: 5M �V �: 5: 0 r °c N W M w m (o , (o U3 (o (a y �— W y N (D r CD, N r CD r (D m jil r �— rn, �r _ o � o ..... J...... I I I N 4 I I I I Y � Iy II I Y Y Y Y Y II I r M I I 6 � f Y ptu Y CTSY b �.Y Y OI N OY N l N0. N Y OI rf ON Y. a:..qY N I cn I 0 N N 0 sqY k Y N I W � 1 pl. co NN Y m Nei pf� O I C) Y C.b l C) CD O i M W x o M W r N d 4 N :- N m 03 v O 7 D 0 S (D (D CL _a (D L O 7 w (D 5' 0 N O 2. (D (fl m o' 7 co a) Ul (D Q O 0 N C) (D (D (D C (D 3 (D 7 N a cn O :? cnv (D W N N CD CL O 7 'o 0 CD 0 N (D n n CL �1 N m n CD C N (D ( i n S ((D 0 w C) O (fl 7 O n O rt C 0 O 7 O w n m c 3 (D O 0 O N 0 O' 7 0 O E O' S N w m z O n O C 0 O 7 N (D N r I? c N m W v l/S (D IZ O 7 a O (D. N (D 0_ n Q N v o, 0 CD C) N v 0 (D c 0 N W v cn CD Q- 0 a O (D N .O (D n n 7 O 3 N O p 0 O 0 O O N CDS (D co sO S 7' 7 d C N (D m m 0 CL (D N Z5' 7 C) N m m O Q N O_ W N N W N O O m m E 0 !Z G N 0 7 17 m m E 0 a N O W N N N (O CD W 0 0) W 0 N O CJI O L W X M tl r Q r Q A. CJ A 2—:: Q: 2:. Q P 2:: Q r < Q w < 0' r < Q r Q r Q r Q M Q' � Q - �' - Q> 6 w Q, O' w Q +' N Q OCAC' (� r fD n fD + CD Y r N tl < r CD a < M CD a < CD r r (D r w CD c Y CD Y < Y CD Y X CD X X CD X M w (D e e (nr. x (ntl X n X r A O r CC a Y C+ fi M � tl � Y � Y atl ND a r S; S O n M O CL O nnn O O d o e m" o A o r o r CD CID a (DM o r r o Y o e o CD' o M a, o r Qr A a, w, w a; wM �n Yb N N r N �, N M N N a O -p' M. N fD e W NY N b N M N Y N r. N Y N. N r N b N X N r N r N e N A. Y a a d (N_] .. �... a... 4... a 4... a... r 4... X 4... 4... ... a... r ... r ;... i... 4... 4... i... a... �... , .. �... �... . , . ... a... r ... a �.. . (n X (n + (n » fn « (n o X o a o M o r o r r CLcl '3'b s �Y <° IM �^ 2« cX O r. CD Q CJ d. C < ". << G C < p. C < ° < " (n tl (n , (n (n (n, (n (n tl' (n ' (n " (n a N X OR (D Y. CD X N r. M CD X CD Y X °: O ) Om: O b a bC µ. dC M N� . I� . N� , I� tl N� iD (D " :D (D :D a a M , X r, I� �j� IC 1 NC iC M.M. �, 7 fD fD CD (D m r. IV X A r r17 Y �j a .Z�1 tl Y .Z�1 a rZl W .Z) x .Zj p �J tl �j M a Y Y r Y CD k (D tl (D tl <D d (D M, N CD a CD i CD ,, CD a 7 Y 7 r :3 " � µ � Y � tl � X f (D a ; m tl la , co X o# o Y o, o tl o Yv e :;30 v" 7 r y w 7 w 7 r, w a 7 ; M " CD " CID N + (D a CD a N d N N I i I I N I III 1 Y VI N Po 4 fli I I N N I N N I N N I III I 1 k, I N I N W N W fi Po N N N Ip I I I Y' I N N r yIr li u II N 0 I I I I I I I' N N f I N I I I N 1 1 C N I N I I i I I N r N N N k f I I k I I I N N 1 I w W p 0 W 1 QO 1N. ?& {i NliW'1j jOIp N IY O N v N N (OO7OC- W N ''.... l A I W 1 J 1 I CT f0 0 O O 90 1 W 0O N M 0) W A1 N 8 p i. AW g,O NW N p1i It IN N I P N N Po N N I N N 6 N m N N I k I I I W Y I N N 1 N N I I. I Y I qi N 8 N I I 1 N Y I b I 1 N Y I N N # N N I N AI 9 N � I 't, I ,.,1.,....,�_1 r 1---_..Ij.,....-..1.....,.,t...,�.N..,,..,..j___ r j-..,_,.1-__..j...,...1...�M.j...»w».t.„,.....� { a col Jm co q i rr V I 01: �h. a O, AM � jtl CpOM Y OP. m� 'P+ jX CSOX Oa. r A. �Y Oa. �tl OW1r yw pr. �r ((OA p A, A, ? r.. p ,. p0 , N, ? r V; O s. p N A N O O w N j' o y r O. O O+ O L CA r N" r � +, j M en tl M a M tl b , M N A k M P, ,.. e w a , r 4 " OD m m E 0 !Z G N 0 7 17 m m E 0 a N O W N N N (O CD W 0 0) W 0 N O CJI O L « , w Q, Q Q Q; ry a, or of oe Qro Q� Q� QY Qm o -m Q g� Q_' Q� Q� Qr QA Q Qi Q °�, Q QY Q y y0 0 CL CL cl al a 111 0 0" o o" m m m w m Y m m m A cu y m Ni N X N m N r w i e , « aw r W ro w w ai y m i CD « CD « CD w CD , CD +. Q" Q, Q Q" Q" �w �M O" O„ O. O o Y Z U) (n « (n a (n (n c c, c c n n a n a e > o w o y c Z. m r m" m Y CD CD nY Q« it nY o r o ° Y ° O a« aY cL n aY y H" n" Q 3; -0 r '0« a e X a °o o d o o O °" ° °' °' w ami ami m« m m o a o, o w o 0 o Z• m. m , 2. v. m my m v« y �6 cM c X o, o, o, o, o o, m Y m «, m « « (DA m v' m" R. 6y m m py n m �' -gyp; �' X; X, CDw o °r Ce Cr Cr Cr .r :w < A G < , < O r N 0« W Y W e SD n CD r N r N« N z N w N� N� CO Y N« N A N r W r y f0-' r. �, �" �' �' o �' m" m °Y m CD ID ala �� m m o> o m mro m m " m " « « . a) aCD o o w 7 o, �; �; �; m e m w m Y v Y m Y o Y o r o y o X °« a) w a1 " N " , w w O , ° , p , p « O r m y nCD CD N a CD X N i ID r (D . N e N r N r N r (n« « r (2 . CR r « q ry O ". r e r e 4 CD r CD w CD i CD «w. e X p "W I N tl I I Y N I I 1 1 1Ig N I N I I I I (( I p N W M N II N I tl I Fn {�7 I 1 I 1 Y N I N O N N A I I A N W I N NN I N N fp f 1 I I I A N N tl I1I N N SII Via, (jjlW NN N� aal OY O� OI O 'C"FhdN AI �I Oy A ? LJ G1�. WI W ? I OD I (p 1 N I r O N O" O O N Grd W W W I W W O ^I I O N Cn COI .p ¢: O N OI Op N 1 4 INp 1 9� f i �I. �I WN DIM �I �1 �06b"I pI W-41 cn I O N Y N N O I W I I I 1 6 N F N N N Y 1 I I Y I I N 1 4 y yy � y ' y a r « w w y « w + « « « A J O G O" O± O" O x, i G r mSt y O" N N O n O y O y C" y w O q i' w O «. O, O i� i7D N txy.i Y « %57 r O W e y, « -" r y O,y. O « O,.w' # r 0..«, O , —+ x_.. CD w . y. O " �.,p: r. �.y. Nom.« p', X w: �.« Wr « « « w Y N�A•. N« N" w« « r " Y « & d 1 Y i , n N Fn m 0 a G (D O� 7 n Nv m m 0 CL N O_ W N N S11 N CL n O cn C C> _M O n m m 0 a m O� l J FT, m 0 n. N O w N N w M 0 m -4 9 : M, : > 0 0 (D CD jg -4 — ---- ---- - - oil C" ch 0 -4 a) CD N Wryto W !n cm 00 o 'n 0 0 0 Ni 0 U 0 C, co OD -4 cn N ZZ -4 -41 1 40 NI C, CA) -41 W 03 ol (n N 00 CD OO 0 O cn a) 0) � 11 11 03 0) . bD zo co ID I WI W 0, S 8 CD co 4 rwQ Ila W co N N! p C4 IJ 00 ca ID 03 o 's 0, to cn PO 0. to tJ 0)1. (A 0? a m m 0 CL CD 0 0 0) T5 m 9 0 CL N 0 P N) _0 O CD 0) 0 0) w 3 c0 w O 7 W <D p1 N C CCD N n O N C C'f rr O V I O w CL m 13c 3 m 7 rt IE� 0 N h T O im 0 n <D h CLw c� N X <D CD a w rt 7 N O s w 0 n 0 0 r C 0 O 3 v �D a n O m m F. O CL G CD O 7 C7 v m m 9 O CL N O_ W N N L CW w I (A. ol .4 b - to W: 0 0 4 -4 0 0 0 0 (A , a 0 RL m m 9 0 CL CD cn. 0 p 0 R m m 9 0 CL N CD 11 b! I I ow 0 0 00 00 ol a 00 to N0) IDa N CDC, C4 C, Go -T 0 C, G3 cn C, 0 wo, w ID 1 4 0 aCD CSD C, cl oll (IM lop V.1 It* 00)l a 1 0 IsD O W pQ 0Ory 00 CW w I (A. ol .4 b - to W: 0 0 4 -4 0 0 0 0 (A , a 0 RL m m 9 0 CL CD cn. 0 p 0 R m m 9 0 CL N CD 11 H 3 O 3 3 X w iv a N 0 n W m m 3 O Q G (D N O 7 n N Fn m 3 O a N O W IV N " , N c, C7 Z « W// opi iii N 7 " • m „ � ' % . 2 o m rj, A(c / ii ~ M (n /% _ p O *' 0 r " m ZI : � �, /r/ sZ 7 a j O_ �� m.� i •moi /i, p Q7 n CO ¢ �' m v 4w I �w / % p ii �i� _ 7 Q/ S9� '� cn w N w /�l/r� / C v r _ Q r�i 1 y `° m 0 (D l//' /f � �/f /" pj% %i rn , rn m m a / or/ / // w r N o f / O y// / rn" rnN rnI rn0 J 7 i// VCD CD N N r/% r// //%C7 N 1 go C) t CDp m N ;IN /i w j / i IV t r y /0 �f nl // N 1 N.....� 0o wcrn i rn� v' j% w w%/%' l0 N) % N N O" c):, yI j. O 1 . O N O I /F/l, w JIWl�yvia0o i �/ , %f A 10o I y /flt a —I r ri if //pn ll l0 rnINN• ul yao /i/y P)i I ' 0 1 J y r% fj/ w l i, f��� // �� W I N b Y N (OD ' g /ii / w 1 � %/�� %% r t v y -4 d co cow Co cow J f' //i,/; I N r N l 1,go � //i 0, a. 0 ow o -T .T_T / r j/iii i-Wr/-x N I v a 1// ' x I) %% py d.adrw"d."p"" IM 'r'AW JW1OyJico03 N N r % A I• N o i k { I y wy rnN A �, rni yJyco ,/pf II rn w W Y W y Co F O /%"/ Q» l/ " O 1 M N /� �%! O O N f/ CD w 1 01 O k O/ /a OK o N I iii/�' ' w 79 " —1 rn:WwNa W i% it of o ��2/%/ Ate' TO _rn J K A N / J" W O a rn O iiIIll /% CD A " CD CD p j7II, f.7t 00 , , ...J b w.J �iC � r�/ O -__-"__ >iJNI� r�yr N w � N " " " m '�I , � �. - �, f /, r �' !// CD �/ / I N /� OOH,N(/' SRI c.Tl rn ce w rn w N W J 1 N ri I N �� a// W W" A O fir/ N w W r // O aJ /o% rn o o Ou �` // U7 W w N T,fri/ l /f f ow 0 0u " a w ov I'M ON og ANSI ��' A w N " cn ' / r " a Am I J rf r N m w � � rn N W � � � - i - - - J/� N �; t f////// f/ �/ (D Cn w ° ° I'voli �., 'lW'J O' N, W,N- O Ql 4 CD ww . wI , w N �//// cZ; Z, 7 0g N 3 c, -, c G) CL CL N N of o r -4r o q Au w a 0), 1 W r wl w 0) r ? ucn N N .q 01 0 or o 1 w r coo 1 P N Y t _ I O r o 11 r W i O eo r V U . ry oy o A r W N r co �N V _ 1 1 N u -1 � I O II N I 8, V 4- - N CD w o a �I tp I V • w a. a'Fe.w..�-� rnl rn of 1 pp N N S W A m 1 eo or M ZY) N N O 1 O � I 1 v ; N I of o 1 N 1 A �1 V � N O N cnN, W N m V1 W m 0 (D CD CL m A O v m 7 (D f0 c Cl) (D G 0 0 0 0 N W 0 O 0 m O <O A O O O O v W O O O O_ O O A 0, 0 A W v O O W 0 CO O O CA WO A O O A 0 O O O O O O n W m m 9 O Q (D W. 0 7 C7 N m m 9 0 a N O w N N 0 9 O r V w w O l0 O to O tD N bw W y b O G W V c) : m; ;S 5 :01 �, � �N Ac MI �� N m ,—_ aw CID �I cn ®a crow vrt, , No Y i t i N W N 1 NI N tNitN NY W A 001 W W N PDN W N N N ~ N e.Ya N W I J I f0 NA ® I OI.. 41 W 010O ? b W b cn D W I O p wC, wN Nob bI cnf � V '.. ok OI ... �.. ... . NII OI W�~ Ob 0 o Yy o o ®Y ow I 0� N 00 00 oa) i g yy Y I --_•�'"_- - N", W .____ r 411111, ---- OI 10I -+i vi oN o coo I Nb ODN W N I I ®III ob)l ®O l of. o p 0Nl .01 I ON 000 W rn1 A o TNI (04 b A 0 (FI 'P 0 4---- 011, D f� I N ®I O O r A pQl nOjM o0 b W Y 0 0 t •N wo I �N ry �P C Nr 3 m rt � C Q r su Q_ C m Z Iy d_^^ Y/ U) n sy m m K 0 YZ G CD T. 0 7 n flI Fn IM 0 IZ N O W IV N CD N 0 O CD Ll L_ 9 ' , cn S"1 V Y i tI m -4 Of W@¢WA NN W A W IOb A N m W 001 V tknJl N A Y O N N (oit� 0oN W JI Dob W o cn 00 W V '.. ok OI NI: O 1 cP q -0y1 I @@ a o o oI o 0 ow I 0� N 0°0 I W 0:2 0 oa) i otO V N I --_•�'"_- - N", W .____ r 411111, ---- OI O NN N w N OD CO w a) I.. y. to ry p tin" NN W O w 0 O a. W r W Aw Nw.. Na O4 N C Nr 3 m rt � C Q r su Q_ C m Z Iy d_^^ Y/ U) n sy m m K 0 YZ G CD T. 0 7 n flI Fn IM 0 IZ N O W IV N CD N 0 O CD Ll L_ C: CD O l Z G) f]1 to 2 CD 0) 0 c W CD r- O n 7 r+ Z 0 7 CD (n. (D 7 Ny' m N O' c U) CD r— G O n ni 7 Z 0 7 N CL (D 7 tU (D O c U) (D r- 0 O n T 7 (CD N Q CD m N O' C: CD r O L13. 7 N Q CD v 5 ((DD O P 0 D CD au v su a, 0 g CD am m d,z" coCL U3 co ... _w- a oau /' , N -Nii iii %° �D --- N � �// I cr io"n N O N N �N N coo %/��/j i �� 1 w Nh mI op ao oO/// % r I 1 N ii //%/ G /'% y� y v l o j rif /, A N ti N o /1iI i N co Do N N W/%/ jj %//ji o_ of 000l of oiNN mg 00 a////✓} w �i ool �N oor op / i%� c �N Aol vlAo1 Ap '�/�/, (u (o N R I MIN --- ffiN "M o o N o N o I N/ /oi/ Gf O W ',- N Yr O O A J///G/�i %JO r O 00 9,'' (Nn O 1 W o I W R V o .-- _ .X _ %//' IRS,, 0 0l inI w' N (O O N O O ti AN woN o wopWo R R R // w OIpwN �j lq C.,21O cli V AIN wol oIV W OI W O RN r RI R p I W N O W 1 N 1 O Y O p O( W O N N 1 W o 1 W 0 -4 A a vl. NN j wN J OmA y(n iaN In � I to 0o A� J W A _co O N I -- -- -- $__._ - W - Of N N Co W J1 tnN NI' (a1 cvNn o�A N(n ANN�, (n jNml A of dl na o i A OON N1 15 .No Cwt C" (Niel wof �.ol K"I CF N R N a R I R o oANN p Ow)l woN -i1 wolN N N RN N R 11PIN., V�, W� 74 60 p. w. (n A�:.co A®N(O, C n R m m 9 0 Q G CD o' 7 n N Fn m 0 Q IV O_ W N N C ?1 m m G / ly 01 fD � M a� Q CL -V"/',"', r. Q/ �` fn 6 N , O %0 i . W� o /j/i N m CD ; i /�/j// m --�--- o3'/ o /� coNI 1 '� 93 1 i�j f% O %41 V00 ID W O 1 W 1 %.i�%//i, a N d A ✓%/ % /,� jr g4fi cco M f%/ IN yy / / //It / CD 2. iri o co OD CD G J% J� j� i///„j, ... b. w- A W t O V t _ j�����/jf "% % 1 O ' 11 co N I % pg w I W Nk ti�/ IN N1_(D W IDW Ul IDD O t 1WO w mom A r W mom - Iwf O 00 O W Y 00 1 00 G �w t9 O� O N NaN wlN IDN N p 4 B 9 I �A a O -4", C; N , G O@ WI1 I of I of ;C-3 o 0 QpNp W co ON o01 00 N N + r A OWO 1.. A W (n V U v Y W 00 N 1 ffl N N I ®AS N ON O� 9 O gsy ayY l m Y N--_ C'S N O C ?1 m m G / ly 01 fD � M a� Q CL -V"/',"', r. Q/ �` fn 6 N , O %0 i . W� o /j/i N m CD ; i /�/j// m --�--- o3'/ o /� coNI 1 '� 93 1 i�j f% O %41 V00 ID W O 1 W 1 %.i�%//i, a N d A ✓%/ % /,� jr g4fi cco M f%/ IN yy / / //It / CD 2. iri o co OD CD G J% J� j� i///„j, ... b. w- A W t O V t _ j�����/jf "% % 1 O ' 11 co N I % pg w I W Nk ti�/ IN N1_(D W IDW Ul IDD O t 1WO w mom A r W mom N N �A °B O' o O -4", C; N , C ?1 m m G / ly 01 fD � M a� Q CL -V"/',"', r. Q/ �` fn 6 N , O %0 i . W� o /j/i N m CD ; i /�/j// m --�--- o3'/ o /� coNI 1 '� 93 1 i�j f% O %41 V00 ID W O 1 W 1 %.i�%//i, a N d A ✓%/ % /,� jr g4fi cco M f%/ IN yy / / //It / CD 2. iri o co OD CD G J% J� j� i///„j, ... b. w- A W t O V t _ j�����/jf "% % 1 O ' 11 co N I % pg w I W Nk ti�/ IN N1_(D W IDW Ul IDD O t 1WO w mom A r W mom S c j (D ;fl !4 0 CL N I o CD 3 0 C O C cn N 7 rr cn (D N N O C1 fA m v m E D (D 0 CD N 0 cn w CD O vc7 W �' rr ht 0 �o c) 0r S' .. o � COL �� a-, N N wap rt M CD M O cr CL p1!!!:!:.� cn < LD N I 1 N R µ ACD Y O in co c I boo I w ami N A � # co / // bra (� 0. N I I / / N 00 / Q m 1 M 9 r i ///////,I O w a 4 aoo I ji W o N mH r'iW/-(w N ////�� g/q,5 G I I ... Y/ / w 10 f o M1 o f//i /iJ l �j co W m o o (D � 1 a/» � I 1 (� Vi cn 0 00 f0 -� I W N O Q O %/ /%/ � 0. 01 NN Ob' NJ'9 N. r pI� / OD RICO N V NK NOw OI 00 l� 111 ID O li O'� O I O r NN I �R,�f�% O 10 O co I '1 O o.._a..._o_,___�__a...�rrJ I p !i .4� � N� OIC Oe•. O //J��� �r�� G V �. 00. ow o If /I I 1 G) N� O O 3 C) < m CD m U3 Z" (D 0 a1 < _ m O (1) 7 0 n v m m 0 Q N O W N N 0 '-F W O N O U1 .A A O dnoiD Ll`[[4oL\i o4.L LR poaudaid sum go!gm `S [OZ `EZ foenuer ` dpnIE nlffviL uvjd otfiaadS (TO.L u&tow6t®QVIvj u;mpjv€[ fa dvD :—nos ON ON ON ON z;ueogluols 000'bZ 000'17Z 000'17Z 000'17Z ploysajyl8uluaaaas Zb£'E 8E0'E L176'Z STL'Z paenalnog Ved uppleg ig anuany paJaaw TLO'E 17Z8'Z ESL'Z 99S'Z anuany paaaaW ig pjenaInog euowea OZb'Z 8ET'Z L6T'Z 9b6'T anuany paenna;S -g paenalnog euowea S9Z'b 98T'E b08% 8S8'Z paenalnog Ved uppleg iS paenalnog euowea LLS'E 8SS'Z 90E'E 69E'Z anla4 zaney0 aesa0 18 paenalnog euowea 6Lb'Z 9ZT'Z ZTZ'Z TZ6'T anuany uo;led Big ig anuany D[}lied LTS'Z SL6'T TSZ'Z b8L'T anuany 8ulunno0 ig anuany 31}[3ed STS'Z 088'T 9TZ'Z SL9'T anuany :pe8og 1g anuany al}[aed LbZ'E b90'E ST6'Z 178L'Z ;aaa;S salaSuy sol q anuany auleW bLZ'Z 680'Z 6TO'Z 688'T ;aaa;S N.ie10 iS anuany auleW ZZO'Z 66b'T E6L'T EEO'Z ;aaJ;S asoawled pue anuany auleVM S9E'Z ZbZ'Z bST'Z 9b0'Z anuany a;uand -g;aa.i;S olllpeg 80S'Z ELT'Z 98Z'Z 086'T ;aaa;S oll!peg pue paenalnog euowea 809'Z ZSE'Z OSE'Z LbT'Z anuany 81Jlunno0 pue paenalnog euowea 8E9'Z 900'Z L017'Z LZS'Z anuany JJe8og pue paenalnog euowea bLT'S ZTL'E 069'b SLE'E anuany uleW pue paenalnog euowea Wd Wd Wd wv uol;aas.ia;ul ;aafoad snld aan;nj ;aafoad snld Sul;slx3 sawnIOA ai}}eal anoH lead sawnIon :)iHeal anoH lead - }odsjoH O:) Ved UIMPIee 96oz pdv C960U0 / VS3 ApnjS OHO 0 xi add podaH joedwi j8jU9LUUOJ!AU3 UBJG BA!IEJIS!U!WPV }WOW U61d ollpads 001 Wed U!MPILG 6ZL'8b bZ'Z 6ZL'8S 6ZL'8S (}s) iueme;saa 17Z8'9LZ OS'Z£ 69E'ES8 69£'ES8 (}s) Ielaaawwo0/Ile;aa 9T8'TZ- LT'Z 9ET'LS 9ET'LS (}s) @31}40 ivawuaanog 17EO'TZ 6S'Z TE6'L9 T£6'L9 (}s) @31140 TOL'OT- 0 000'0 0 (}s) iled@a oiny OT6'TT- 0 000'0 0 (}s) a31440 le31paW ObL'EZ- 0 000'0 0 Bulan;3e}nuelN 6TL'OT 8Z'Z ENT17 E9E'tib (4s) Ieu;snpul 0 99018£ (}s) sa13ll!3ej uo1}e3lunwwo0 0 LL'S 6bT'176 ELT'SS aaiva:) A31unwwoD 0 OT6 A;!I13ej 311gnd LT- bS'9 TSL Zb (s,na) Ieiivaplsaa A11wej alBu!S 8b8 88'8 068 (s,na) s;uaw:pedy-Iel;u@plsaa Itisl j say"a"d }sal 3s io n dal asfl p el aM 'a4"a buil y 33aroJd annop;!s aanouani g2IH :3@a T9'0 000'0T 00010T (Is);ueineisaa IIeW d!j;s :;aa 6E'SE SbS'9LS Sb5'9Ls (}s) IenjawwoD/Ile;aa •Splg a3I}40 'anog :woo b8'17 ZS6'8L ZS6'8L (}s) a3I}}0;uawuaanog 'BPIe a31}10 Ieaauag:wo0 687 L68'9b L68'9b (}s) 331}}0 aaivaD aaeD o;ny :;aa L9'0 TOL'OT TOL'OT (}s) aledaa oiny PIG a3I}}0 Ie31paW MOD ZL'0 OT6'TT OT6'TT (}s) a314}0 Ie31paW 9upni3e}nueW :Pul 8S'T ObL'EZ ObL'EZ Bulani3e}nueA 'pul;y8!lleaauag:pul SZ'Z bb9'EE bb9'E£ (is)Ielaisnpul (aa;uaD 99018£ (}s) sal;!I!3ej uol;e3lunwwoo DIAD);uawuaanog :wok LL'S 617T'b6 ELT'SS as;ua:) A;lunwwo:) OT6 Ai!I!3ej 3llgnd AIIwej alsuls :saa EL'L Z'90T 6S (s,na) Iel;uaPlsaa Apwej ajOu!S (P!W);uawiaeddy :saa ES'O Zb Zb (s,na) s;u@wiaedy-Iel;uaplsaa sy palapolN sai3y }s41 Td -s -j -o 0Q as0 puel BulisM ac4 A71 asl I puel. uos1p3 elujo}11eJ uaaglnos :AuedwoD A;lmn SEOZ :33@foad tiTOZ Bu!;slx3 :aeaA Ieuolpend0 6 :auoZ aiewilD avgovDs - salasuy sol AiunoD 'uolie3ol 33afwd :silne}ap Bullapow iou aje ieyi sindul PoW33Ie3 sindul poVM331e0 pue suoiidwnssd Ved uinnpleg •lz)afoad pasodoad ayl ao; suo!sslwa lau ay; aulwaalap of palapow sasn puel ayl sluesaadaa Sulmollol ayl'll!ngaa pue panowaa aq lou Aew leyl sBu!pl!nq aol sp.iepuels Aaua!:)!}}a aaMau aiGnsse lou op leyl suo!ss!wa lou ui llnsaa lllm s! s!yl 'panowaa aae LT ley; sueaw leyi'Z17 aq Aluo ll!m aaayl suoll!puoj;aafoad aapun •6S aney suo!3!puoo Bu!ls!xa aapun sa:)uap!saa Allwel alSu!s'aldwexa aoj 'panowaa aae sasn puel asoyl awnsse am'Suas!xa woa; asn puel ui aseanap a si aaayl aaagm •luawdolanap Mau ayl aapun sluawlaede mau S17S sawnsse Bu!lapow 'aao}aaayl •luawdolanap M@u ayl aapun 068 aae aaoyl al!4m sl!un Bu!llamp ZT aney uo!;!puoa Bul;s!xe ayl aapun s;uawlaede le!luop!saa 'aldwexa ao3 •pal:)nalsuo:) aq lllm sasn puel leuolllppe ayl lsnf leyl Bu!ls!xa ayl aano sasn puel saseaa:)u! luawdolanap Mau ayl;! leyl Su!wnsse aae at,A s!sAleue aAllenaasuo:) a se'sD!;!:)ads ayl mouN lou op oM asne:)ag 'lllnq-aa pue panowaa aae saaylo al!gm Aels Aew sasn puel leu!B!ao ayl to awos'loafoad asnpuel ll!lul ue s! s!yl asneoag p j iib '§ pue! s;ndul poW93M) pue suo!;duanssy )Iaed uinnpIe8 0017'T6 VT (}s) lueanelsaa 6S'TE ; 96'9Z 908'LE L6LTZ (Is) lepaawwo3/I1elaa LZO79 1717S'E „9 �5 (Is) a:)!}}03uawuaano9 L R ` U9 ZE8'OT SOS (is) ao!�0 000'0 0 dv"0", ;? �.; „ s a!edaa olnd (d) 000'0 0 B'�TE 6L ,' (ds) a�!}}O leo!p@A 000'0 0 "G ;; ;;2u!anlae}nueiN L08'9 6ZZ (3s) le!alsnpul S9Z s9Z (;s) sa!3!I!oe3 uo!leo!unwwo0 SS8'ZZ 9981 SS8'ZZ 998T aalua:) Allunwwo:) 0 0 Al!l!oe� :)!Ignd 8EZ'8 917E (s,fla) lelluap!saa Apwe3 alBu!S ,.. LSS'S ,,, , ,`'; e.: 9172 (s,f1(3) sluawlaedy le!luap!saa TI-S)—ji—o-n—al sd!ar l±Cne P asn puel a;ea dul a;ea d!al :Pafoad Bul;s!x3 •Bu!lepow ayl olui paleaodaoou! aae leyl sanleA asoyl aae sanleA papegS* :a1e21 d!�l ., _ � o-vubold--o ,sa�.rrro Jig d OZ1717 ESZ EL917 SSL 8LT EE6 (aaAoldwa/:Ubs ESE) saaAoldwa S99E SL OVLE (ploysnoy aad suosaad 17.17) sluap!saa laN Sullslx3 l�afoad uo!;e!ndod J Olu JiSi ARAOU!.Ao .d.. u.dBppyp �:1Ws3 78'T 6ZL'9V 6ZL.8.17 (;s) luea,ne;SaU jjeVq d!.AIS:10H p 'OT 17'Z,8'9ZZ T+78'9LZ 4s) lelaaauiwoM1elaa 'BPIg ao!j10 leaaua9 :woo 08'0 17E0'TZ 17E0'TZ (ds) Boulo 'pul lyS!l leaaua9 :pul SS'O 6TL'OT 6TL'OT (;s) le!alsnpul (p!N) luaupeddy :saa SE'S 8178 (s,na) sluawlaedy-le!luap!saa sd pa!apow sai3y}sal js ao na oi,aoua.7s joafoad °Bplg a3u,y;0 WOE) M03 997 9T8'TZ 9T8'TZ (Is) a:)!J10luawuaano9 aaluaD aae;l 0100 „laid LTO TOL'OT TOL'OT (Is) a!edaa olny pig o3gy) lej!pajm mo°I ZL'O OT6'TT OT6'TT (;s) aNHO le:)!palN Buijn:peynuaelN „pup 8S,T O17L'EZ 017L'EZ Suunloe;nuevl Ilwe3 air ps_as ag 6T`.T LT (smo) lelwaplsau Allwej a! u!S polopo say �s� ds ao naT oianua.7s 6u►Aix3 •lz)afoad pasodoad ayl ao; suo!sslwa lau ay; aulwaalap of palapow sasn puel ayl sluesaadaa Sulmollol ayl'll!ngaa pue panowaa aq lou Aew leyl sBu!pl!nq aol sp.iepuels Aaua!:)!}}a aaMau aiGnsse lou op leyl suo!ss!wa lou ui llnsaa lllm s! s!yl 'panowaa aae LT ley; sueaw leyi'Z17 aq Aluo ll!m aaayl suoll!puoj;aafoad aapun •6S aney suo!3!puoo Bu!ls!xa aapun sa:)uap!saa Allwel alSu!s'aldwexa aoj 'panowaa aae sasn puel asoyl awnsse am'Suas!xa woa; asn puel ui aseanap a si aaayl aaagm •luawdolanap Mau ayl aapun sluawlaede mau S17S sawnsse Bu!lapow 'aao}aaayl •luawdolanap M@u ayl aapun 068 aae aaoyl al!4m sl!un Bu!llamp ZT aney uo!;!puoa Bul;s!xe ayl aapun s;uawlaede le!luop!saa 'aldwexa ao3 •pal:)nalsuo:) aq lllm sasn puel leuolllppe ayl lsnf leyl Bu!ls!xa ayl aano sasn puel saseaa:)u! luawdolanap Mau ayl;! leyl Su!wnsse aae at,A s!sAleue aAllenaasuo:) a se'sD!;!:)ads ayl mouN lou op oM asne:)ag 'lllnq-aa pue panowaa aae saaylo al!gm Aels Aew sasn puel leu!B!ao ayl to awos'loafoad asnpuel ll!lul ue s! s!yl asneoag p j iib '§ pue! s;ndul poW93M) pue suo!;duanssy )Iaed uinnpIe8 SS'9E OS'E60'EL 17S'L6 V/N (}s) luemelsaa Z9'LOZ 0£'96Z'ST17 1elol °% V/N (is) lepjawwoD/Ilelaa 917'L8 EE'OT V/N 69'817 ES'S8E'L6 (Is) a0l}}0luauauaanog 8L'ST 00'TSS'T£ V/N (ds) a31g0 V/N 88'EZ EL'89L'L17 (Is) aledaa olnV S9'LZ9'ZS6'0£ V/N 8S'9Z 179'S9T'ES (}s) aal}}0 leolpalnl 00'0 V/N 667S LT'17L6'SOT SulanlaejnueA 170'8 OS'8L0'9T gyp° ��li�1T V/N (}s) lepisnpul V/N 0 WL£. ST'L88'SL (s,no) lelluaplsaa Al!wej alSu!S TL'Z68'T 09'6Z17'S8L'E (is) aoWo V/N (s,no) sluaualaedV-lelluaplsad aee suo Tea sql Tea suol !ea sql :asn pue (}s) aolg0 IealpaW Sullslx3 2ullslx3 % r� r Sulan ae nue W :alseM PJoS lapow of palldde seaae papeys* 86'LZ OL'096'L68'ZE L6'OTZ'£E S9'LZ9'ZS6'0£ iw/suoneg suolleg lOafoad Pafoad 96'OOT OZ'T17 L9'S176'LZS'9E 66176 SO'ELT'S8 178'LL17'Z09'8 AJV llufl/suopeg suolle9 Su!ls!x3 Sulls!x3 loo} ane aad suolleS 90-388890'£ T'ZTT lelluaplsaa-uoN 17'92 lelluaplsaa AjV adAl asn pue3 luauaaalnbaa (]N'OVDS jad - Aluo seg of „paleSll!W„ luawailnbaa oWbVDS 0 Pafoad sindul PoW331eJ pue suolldwnssd aSesn aaleM i,��ealse,�p xa�e; llnela(i :sa:)eldaalj 0 aanolspoo/N Sullslx3 :Daay 917'Z 17S'L6 paslna'd ZO'0 86'0 1elol °% TZ'Z 917'L8 EE'OT llnelao POA331eo suoo2e3 algoaaV °%luelal;daS sNuel :)lldas ON ** OL'096'L68'ZE L9'S176`LZS'9£ S9'LZ9'ZS6'0£ 178'LL17'Z09'8 00'0 00'0 �l011'6ZO'LE 00'000'SLE (;s) lueinelsaa gyp° ��li�1T Ob b68'17ET'Z OS L£17'OZ9'TZ s elaaawwo ie a (�) I/I. a TZ'E89'EVT ST'170T'SS171 °Z ;, O � d ° ''! (Is) aal}}0 luauauaanog 8£ SS9 £LT OS L£9 8SL'i (is) aoWo 00,0 00'0 � � ��� `LIZ°T p �� (Is) aledaa olnV 00'0 00'0 J%�� ��' ' � 'i��� °` (}s) aolg0 IealpaW Aoo lno% /66'8 00'0 00'0 % r� r Sulan ae nue W aoopu!°% %TO'T61c ;i'%/r 00'059`T9Z'T (Is) Isla}snpul Ielalsnpu1/1epi awwo:) r��TL'085`ZT (Is) sall!I!aej uolleolunwwoD aoopino°% %98.OT 176'T9L'9EZ 6Z'8ZL'L6E'Z OE'SZ9`817£ 0S'L8S'0£S'£ aaluaD AllunwwoD aoopul°% %17T'68 Alllpe3 allgnd :le!luap!sab OZ'S£S'TST 0L'SZ£'E17Z'T ,� �q%��< i;�ti (s,flo) le!luaplsaa Alluaej alSu!S 0 , ,. 9`88£ 00'0179'88T £ (spa) sluaua}aedV-lelluaplsab $�� � le leu�a3dl ��ele�1:1"dl�„�' le li��a�alul' :ash pue� "j"euaa}x3 lapow of palldde seaae papeys* 86'LZ OL'096'L68'ZE L6'OTZ'£E S9'LZ9'ZS6'0£ iw/suoneg suolleg lOafoad Pafoad 96'OOT OZ'T17 L9'S176'LZS'9E 66176 SO'ELT'S8 178'LL17'Z09'8 AJV llufl/suopeg suolle9 Su!ls!x3 Sulls!x3 loo} ane aad suolleS 90-388890'£ T'ZTT lelluaplsaa-uoN 17'92 lelluaplsaa AjV adAl asn pue3 luauaaalnbaa (]N'OVDS jad - Aluo seg of „paleSll!W„ luawailnbaa oWbVDS 0 Pafoad sindul PoW331eJ pue suolldwnssd aSesn aaleM i,��ealse,�p xa�e; llnela(i :sa:)eldaalj 0 aanolspoo/N Sullslx3 :Daay '0pwppss0lp p,a OMIgm p.)iln aal pinogs ialem pawie(o,-iW 'rnu)ul rad salrw Sl p )13x;) sp 0& purm IM30,RtM KIesSaaan oq f uz buanboi3 Ouualem paseaiou) 'alis ogl2u}nea( cuoi3lsnp amoy!u jWDA�.fld ollu,rel itgpis aq p[nogs SuualuM alnlp s,,+uul.ry b lseaj It pnti4vum aq )p^t)s seaJe uory,l J)t 'uoo anrloe Ile `sa!llArlae uopeledoid puno-I2 aaglo pue `uorleneoxa `Ou}pe15 uro13 suorssrwa lsnp 0Aclr2n3 oonpar oZ •suorssrwa (k;'i-Wj puuror'-Nj) lsnp aer1l2n; aanpag :£-gid aunsuaw lnuladlose" )ntN%Nhl..l v 511114JIN ))1 iolid wlautlaai oq lleg; vacs+.rosu.ugs uol'Jtromp.M a r e o sutra u*ot 1 as �s[aosl:�n at su)apssrau lgarussdru,rr,a aA'0Itj rr,r p(tIOM e')SOtpl lsrapp Xp") aql 01 ONuap!A:) moils op g1 nrtO).) all llr1Is, Inulagdltry ,)tqa J'N ltll S"tA"t 'uJD1 ')pn tl'1uCklulE7�A VV1'A1 4Vt t1B11 )ll.'1,t.➢ 7 41 I%CE Lt t)"i g»7alllrs,;�; po^;o�4dw).r.l au(q ats,f tur�aslwugo .,u,u Al ! "V'xl'rl:Sl.l {", . • gh1 k : � l:rnst�uMro,) �,I a rou V, flrr lu�sgi a)1 .:)(a{w�.)) dtuau s a;.u1�)1ssntta �p )o-tuu �'u.lft~� 1' A-" C 7 " 1 "1V"„ 7 rYl.}.�4ti ). t 4 "Ins lu'hu6i. mbo ilowmi'll R;oo:7 1V!) algujilMi ti37t T1')j01,HjM PlgepnlAu, p;1V,)1<4 r�1Ckft', A`9E111 llpn;+6�r9d r ,fV.p q. `apgl`p1 AI" p n Y'I lntawi co ,a n11.i171U! AtVR)Y w9. e,rs„tu(. Il H l lY 11 "Ins ti&p.,(. YBURIi✓".:�V,)p�lu"Y "w "mi"Itio V) w)11,4 t JOU, �4°,�'A,,.iA "111"I1ITNIm 13 )v "l•1°1Vh6 pl'9np, O„ uR'•R.pl . ojtioo1� 1amodas,ioq &p lm jiimudVnb,? pupil �Nj!V,, po #(1^ jvgd . id4aba. jIvt,p`" 1xa(o.V1� suorss[wa s,Wd pue `01W(I `OD ,ON J02I oonpai of poluawaldwr act Kegs Ourmo(lo3 aqZ •lsnugxa aur2ua luawdm6a uopana;sm) uio ij suoiss)wa aanpag -I-jHV aunsuaw (7aags aWny uo paseq) sane S'T safllnlhy uollana;suog o; pailiddiv uop-0111 allsuo paaueleq aae slelialew Ile legl sawnssy aaueganlslp to sane Allep wnwlxelN U0I;DAD1X31f)U1 pDJ.9 'poW331eJ olul indul aaamjeq} suolllpuoa llnelap-uou aql sluasaadaj molaq papinad.uollew.lolul uollanalsuoa aql .awll_awes pq; le anaao pinoa Ioafoid lenplAlpul auo uegl aaow se delaano pinoa sasegd;eg; pawnsse osle sl 11 '11!ngaa pue panowaa aq pinom s9u!pl!nq 2ullslxe Ile;egl pawnsse sl ll sadAl asn puel 2ululewai agl aoj •olaeuaas uollanalsuoa ag; woal peleulwlla aaam s2ulppnq asagl to ageloolaienbs aql aaolaaagl pue sasnpuel asagl ul asuega ou aq pinom aaagl legl uollanalsuoo to sasodind aq; aol pawnsse sem 11 Ileguaplsai pue Sullslxa uaamlaq sasn puel sa!1!Ipel suollealunwwoa ao'aaluao Allunwwo0 'All!I!oej allgnd aql ul Ouega ou sl aaagl anseaag •olaeuaas asea lsioan a se RDA uaAIS Aue ul palanalsuoo aq pinom luawdolanap mau lelol aql to %OT legl pawnsse sl 1!'quilapow to sasodjnd aql ao3 •alnpagas uollanalsuoa uanl2 a lou sl aaagl'ueld allpads a sl slgl asneaae NOLLMHOMI NolonaLsNOJ SDA saA (elwollleD ul panalgae AlluaaanD) uollanpaa alsenn %OS b saA ON (luawa.11nbai uaaag lei uo paseq) uollanpaa aalem %OZ E saA ON (ETOZ pUe 8002 uaamlaq aouaaagp) VZ all!1 uegl aawaag %ST Z saA ON AluO seg leinleN of las aaeldaa!j T laafad Sul;slx3 :(uol;lpuog paled;lwun paaaplsuoa) suol;elnSou luann� lenba of palldde uolle8ll!W s;ndul poW331e:) pue suol;dwnssy Ved uinnpIee (asn pue! 2ul)six@ agalo 711aDjad pY uo paseq) OO8'ESO'661 uOplowap to agelool aaenbS ZZ'0 L8'S 067L8'S (Is) lueanelsaa SZ'E b£'S8 Z6'9E£'S8 (Is) lelaaawwoD/Ilela2l ZZ'0 TL'S 09'ETL'S (is) a01}10luatuuaanog 9Z'0 6L'9 OT'E6L'9 (Is) a:)WO EZ'0 bb'b OE'9Eb'117 (Is) lepisnpul 99'0 00'S Kno) lelluaplsaa AI!wej alOulS 68'0 00'68 (s,fl0) sluawTledy-lelluaplsay Sony S41 Td—S--jo—n—G—j joaA.lad pa;3n.l;suoj aq o} asn puD7 S OST 9TOZ/LZ/ZT 9TOZ/T/9 Bulleoglejnlaallgaay S 08 91OZ/OZ/S 9TOZ/T/Z BulAed S OEZ 91OZ/9T/ZT 9TOZ/T/Z uollanalsuo:) 2ulplln9 S 08 9TOZ/OZ/S 9TOZ/T/Z uo1leneax3 S 08 91OZ/TZ/b 9TOZ/T/T uo11!lowad loann/sAea sAed # DM3 pu3 a;ea ave;g asegd •suo►;dulnssD p0W33103 uo pasaq alnpaps uOiVn.l;suol 'poW331eJ olul indul aaamjeq} suolllpuoa llnelap-uou aql sluasaadaj molaq papinad.uollew.lolul uollanalsuoa aql .awll_awes pq; le anaao pinoa Ioafoid lenplAlpul auo uegl aaow se delaano pinoa sasegd;eg; pawnsse osle sl 11 '11!ngaa pue panowaa aq pinom s9u!pl!nq 2ullslxe Ile;egl pawnsse sl ll sadAl asn puel 2ululewai agl aoj •olaeuaas uollanalsuoa ag; woal peleulwlla aaam s2ulppnq asagl to ageloolaienbs aql aaolaaagl pue sasnpuel asagl ul asuega ou aq pinom aaagl legl uollanalsuoo to sasodind aq; aol pawnsse sem 11 Ileguaplsai pue Sullslxa uaamlaq sasn puel sa!1!Ipel suollealunwwoa ao'aaluao Allunwwo0 'All!I!oej allgnd aql ul Ouega ou sl aaagl anseaag •olaeuaas asea lsioan a se RDA uaAIS Aue ul palanalsuoo aq pinom luawdolanap mau lelol aql to %OT legl pawnsse sl 1!'quilapow to sasodjnd aql ao3 •alnpagas uollanalsuoa uanl2 a lou sl aaagl'ueld allpads a sl slgl asneaae NOLLMHOMI NolonaLsNOJ SDA saA (elwollleD ul panalgae AlluaaanD) uollanpaa alsenn %OS b saA ON (luawa.11nbai uaaag lei uo paseq) uollanpaa aalem %OZ E saA ON (ETOZ pUe 8002 uaamlaq aouaaagp) VZ all!1 uegl aawaag %ST Z saA ON AluO seg leinleN of las aaeldaa!j T laafad Sul;slx3 :(uol;lpuog paled;lwun paaaplsuoa) suol;elnSou luann� lenba of palldde uolle8ll!W s;ndul poW331e:) pue suol;dwnssy Ved uinnpIee AJessaoaN uoileBlIUM ON leuoile.ladp paleSil!N 19'87Z`61 •gjmoJS pasodoid aq; woJ} saaAoldwa pue s;uaplsaJ }o Jagwnu le;o; aq; s;uasaidw uol;elndod a9lAJaS;aafoJd £ •uol;elndod 09lAJas aAl;:)adsaJ Jad pallpa aq o; pa;edlol;ue azo:) lenuuy Z Ielol •sasnpuel panowaJ aq; woJj saaAoldwa pue s;uaplsw ;o Jagwnu le;o; aq; snup gjmoJ2 pasodoJd aq; woJ; saaAoldwa pue s;uaplsaJ }o Jagwnu le;o; aq; s;uasaJdaJ uol;elndod a3IAJaS;aN 67'E8T STOZ AJenuefSullapovq poW331e3 VS3 :aoJnoS oN �lueoipuS!S loafoJd a43 sl 0917 WS/1W) ploysaagl, 8T'7 zuol;elndod aDIAJaS;oafoJd /aZ00 £L9`7 Euol;elndod aoIAJaS;oafoJd 8L'E zuollelndod aolAJaS 3aN /azOJ OZ7,7 Iuol;elndod aoIAJaS;aN OL'ETL'9T Ielol WON uol;onJ;suoO pazlljowy 7T'6ST 16'L L7'8 9L'Z7T Ja;em TS'S6L 00'0 TS'S6Z 10'00S a;sem 09'7SSTT 00'0 TL'9 68'L78TT al!goW 7£'OT7E OT'ZT LZ'£ L6176EE ASJau3 SZ'E61 L6'0 6Z'O 0076T eaJy ;oafoJd 3aN 19'87Z`61 Ielol 67'70Z ET'OT L8'OT 67'E8T aa3eM TE'E78 00'0 TO'7ZE OE'6TS a3seM SZ'STZ`bT 00'0 Z9'6 E9'SOZ`7T al!goW 9S'98L`E 8£'ET STE ES'69L`E A2lJau3 00'661 OUT E7'0 LS'L6T eaJy 9L'SE8'Z Ielol 9E'S7 £Z'Z 077 7L'07 Ja;eM 6L'L7 00'0 OS'8Z 6Z'61 a;sem S9'09£`Z 00'0 T67 7L'LS£`Z al!goiN TZ'9LE 8Z'T 8£'0 9S'7LE ASJau3 7L'S 70'0 bT'0 9s'S eaJy 1W �I ;oafoJd pasodoJd aunoS feuopej Sulls!X3 uui;Jna;auuJ AaewwnS su0'ssiw3 9H9 Wd uimpleg c N m m N m CL O 3 m 7 90 Z 0 7 b M X v ^rf W 0 c 0 C � lz = — SO m 0 N N ... N O N j (D O« 7 N M (D mID m, o 'U (D m' 3 m 3r « m« d cn m n r m CDCD p« r-, O n » 7 ' ; N 0)cn c o d» n» m o c m 1�r «= m co o» a boa« s G. c ' W r d r In « N f0 fu Nu a �» co m 10 fll ... y... y... y. . o N n I? 3� a N 'z a �r UO1. �' O" A' N' (coo 4 A WA » J ' (0r » 00 C) v 9 N O N O N co 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 ^ Z O 0 0' o' o' O N O I O I O I O I 7 1 c/1 N N 1 N 1 N 1 N I (O I co 30 - G� s N IU 0 N 1 I I 1 1 T 1 1 1 1 1 N 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 p 1 1 1 N 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I O W I 01 O I 01 01 O ON� Nj Nj Nj Nj Oj W,,. (4 o 'D 1 I O W I 1 I I I I V N 1 1 I 1 1 ' -.. ''''' i N I C71 0.')(�0 o 0. o 0 0 -4i "' o �N o» o' o' o' o' o o of o» o. CD o' o' o k � N1 1 1 1 « n « N Or 'O: Oa Or O'r p« Ul r 7 Q C: N w to (D D D� 7 5 v t v 9 P N 03 RL CL G 1 0 01 7 O N rt i O 7 S -0 3 A) N Q al a c 3 X Q. n N Fn m O CL CD In O n N Fn m O CL N O W N N 0 cD N P— IQ O CJl O If D o o Q ,N.. � .o�'.. rµ .o�'-. s .ern•.: rt ��'o.. ; N � � � ,�"'-. S' W 0 , o. o, 0 0 W o d o o; o; 0 0 =F =r 7 w co m m" an d m r m" m m r m" m a rn t , W e « d v -01 -0" m + ori v " m -0.1 T m M m Z. ZcD'Da M . m, m, m« oCL CL cl " v o" px pY v v, �a ve y x y m ca cn o N„ N" CDW CD « e � cn �.... '# A Y. A �# �# Z4 0 1 1 O Y O# p# O' 21 O) � N p ! I Y a# OK O# OK O _... ON ! 00 p 00 @ 00 00 O N jM " „ O� « �� N„ 0# W �; N., OX N. �r NA j. CO OM CO ON Wa,. C) ,r �M C)X O �X q a x v « 0 C c v_ m o rn 0 0 0 0 0 — w m 3 Y� D `� o � n a a n o N 7 c w O O N 5 O y -0 cc c � r r O r o 0 O (D o0 0 O O (D (D (D (D 7 !v a CL 0) N o � o p - — - (D Q (D (D (D (D (D 0 7 m >v m-0 O 0 O ' ' • > >0vN O N > �3mO CD vvv p0 Nym 3 X . cn L = N _Fn �F rt p N O 7 3 a co j, N (0 N (S ai =r R v c CDC fD (D N (D (p 7 -O N n o a 3 v FD* M n (D r•: cn D .0 v (o 0 w O (D (D O CD CD (D N (D cn .J CD 3 rh a) CD C� n O 0 O N cn (D N m C 3 CD cn v cn (D N a O. (D (D 0 O 7 Q C 0 (D Y1 0 c (D (D v N O v O v YZ (D 3 O o' (o N _Q M 0 0 0 O 3• fD r v Y1 c CD 0 0 O O N v O (D CDv �C S YZ (D (D O 3 (D CD No n 3 !D' w m m CL (D n < cn CD N CD. (n .�. 7. N a n C Yy CL 0 m O (n ca r O CL O W Z ? N p :: N O (D O O' v CD0 3 N (n w N O' (1) 7 c co 3 (D sZ D1 v 3 v Y� x m 3 m O N 3 0 O W O 0 O C.o- o. O c v CD l< CD v 71C: N 7 N C) C 9,y m O N N N O (D O 0 a .7 C a O' CD 1 #u m m 0 0- (D N 0 7 n N Fn m 0 ss N O_ w N N Iv CD W 0 W Ln 0 03 �N N N O Ul D tl M : aM EF EF EF Q Q, Q Q�. ° r�. Q Q ; Q* Q: E; Q: Q: Qw Q: Qa Q: Q: Q: Q" Q: Q:.. Q:. O , O =N� Fn m: m: m' m" m; m: m; m" m; m" m" m," m' m" m" m:' m° I' m'; m; m' m' m' m" �« m` �" m « > w a �" a �r CD > M w >" r =D3 w. >° „ =' CD r. =1 0 x =" CD r. =" Ye (ID � x W r Y Y e cD D X x C Y C C=D' (O (:D:' (O CD (:D:' (O (O N N, (O , M (O w (O ' r (Q s (O a cfl Y (O " (O ' (3 . (O « (O w (O ° (O a (O Y (0 Y (O Y (3 (O a `G CD " `G a x `G �. s . w f a r " X, `Q r ( " .� .� .� Y r .� : `G : ,G { `G , C, `'G ; `G : C; C, '< , CY `G , `G , `G , C, C, C, `G : Cr x C„ : C; f Cr O e 7. O C, Ca C, C„ Cz C C, C, C{ Cr C„ C, C, C„ C. N N N N, N, N, N, N N, N N, (D N w (D N, N ,. (D CD N x CD N; CD N" CD N{ CD N, CD N x CD N, CD N, CD N, CD N x fD N y CD a N, (D (D r CD r CD X CD CD CD CD { a CD CD y N r 3 y a �, Y a y a r "; X Y Y Y v ; v N M N . a... f a... a... a... a... a... a... �... , ;... : a... a... a... ;... a... ;... �... a.. , a... {... 4... a... �... I s 4... a... Y M. a... 4... �. . r : a D x r r CD z; z z w z z :, z: z r r 5, 3, Y 5 Y S a " r' N IN N mr r + � r z tl � e z x —i s Z Y ---I Y Z ry Z _—� Z S 3 :, X U% A Ar A AX A; A N, A« PQ N,. Aw NM Ax N, Ay Na AM Nw AM N, Ar Ne: Ne NY Nw N Nr. 7 X 7 m 7 X O M O 7, (O , 7 r. (Q , 7` CD 7 O , « �Z mx m, m; m{ m, m: z, zX; zy zy z z, zn m m� m� m� m� m� mX mr m m, mX m„ mf �« G) � M 0 G e C) � r Q w (DX CD r Co Y CD Y CD« CD Y m" o X o 0—« n X .n-., (� Y C «, (� r 0—. N Y N Y M M , w Y ^� X ro .1p.. Www 0. . X.. Xr 1p. » « �.. "0• . ,x d^' d r.1r . «�. f . w�.. . i ., .. YX .... i.. ,�. w" . Y�f4 M N M ,�,. ,f . ,... .. ,.... ,�... i .. I. » f I•� I # I # 1 1 N N I I I I b k N 1 1 1 Y 1 4 4 N I I # I I I I # N N 1 ' k M I I 0 9 r @ { Ul k I N k N{ AI 1 # N WN G' l '� N I Y of 1 ?# A �) Cn 8 'mak Ool A� Yf� Wy ;1 of CT)cn i0% a1 �� Jal OI Wk W� A "Ui �� ao N _ N N u'1 W oN ool W@ Gvtl ha# 7nN # A l ^#w p N p N N k C7t I COI �I O O I N I I I P I E 0° # A I I b° k I CO #- # Co # N m N A I CD y O M # k I I# I # I N NT O s r w s a __.4.m....4-4. _. ' a : f A 1. : tl M r 0 0' o' o o: o o' o' o- O o°' o"' o' O o p oX o o rD o: o 0 0° o: oy Ou f off, Or Oy O{ Or f Of « Or Of OX Of n �f r e Of Or O « i3q O{ X Or C7{ O e O Or Ow Of O« N �. N ,. O, -_O f O Y, O Y O{ O f O Y O O O Y O« O w n D Y„? x... O M ... �. 0 r O Y .0 f O r .: O M M A y X 9 e ._. A ; r r « w. • Y Y k « w f w .. ♦ tl f f f X x w. a. « « X > w Y w « � Y y7i #u m m 0 0- (D N 0 7 n N Fn m 0 ss N O_ w N N Iv CD W 0 W Ln 0 03 �N N N O Ul D ti 0 In 0 N N N N f0 LO M 0 'IP N 0) (6 a N N M r 0 N 0 2 w w_ m U C O N C0 C w w U « r , i Y Y 6 6 YO 6 'O ab "O '(D "O r '".p 'O °O ''O «O "6 "O r0 r "0 "O d0 'p 'O "O "O "O '0O r0 "CD "O 'O "O "O r6 °0 `00 "(D °CD M M 'N 'N `N U) 'N °N "N O r b '„ 6 a b a b r b tl N, C. Y. O O a 0 x Y 6 O r 0 r 0 " % O N 6 tl 6 tl b r CO3 a 0 a. 0 �, O « O N « 6 ', O O , M 1.6 a a a, Y, 1 r I NNN P 1 1 1 I r 1 1 r 4 tl r tl tl NI M tl I P@g N tl II rl Ntl M I I t 1 I P P k d i Y 1 P 1 rI I 1 N r. I N 1 N «C)) I6 1,� I� Cl) o '1� N N6 qb N 10 1 10 IN IN tl� 111 NCA PO 1 10 it (� P U� N® Np N I� @ PN I NO N N NCD NM 16 N M 6 p x NM N tl� I I� I IN I 1� N� NN Np A 9p 1 16 1� A I6 I I6 ICp I 1N PCA IU 1"t NN N IM @SCD Nr' N� tl� 16 �r" 1� MO 9,O �,� lcfj I� IN 1N SIM I.O a� 1M I� T �~ 1� YM N0 1� rp N NN 1� fp Np Np 1" N I I I I N N A 1 1 1 I� I II NNN0 N Y I 1 N tl tl 1 1 I N I 1 I 1 N I Po A tl N tl k tl 1 N N N 1 r' 1 tl I tl tl I 1 r I I r 1 k N P 1 P 1 N 1 N I r r 1 N N A 1 ! r l N A I N 1 N r 1 P P N N NAN 1 I III II N N N I I I r r A N N N N 1 I N P 1 N N « tl A P P N N P tl 1 I P N' r A I M I N I lb 14 I N r I 1 N ..r ......� I I .., P .., ... P N ... I 4 ......w r I « ..H I ...M I ...............� 6 P N r N ..................� r I 1 P P I ............� r 1i N 1 .... I. . r tl r r N « y cG (C-01 m « + CM-) m « O a jf « jf n 0 ry tl r 'O Y r n M « m f y x d. Y m �o. d n N r 0 r O O " O) ' 0) " 0) " OI " O p X O w(D a(� '(� '(� '(� ' "(D ' am 10 'm X' O 'O " '0 '0 a(� '(2 �� 'N m mm o "m r "m wm r + N "m N( nm n. N ' z '" z '' z X z ' z z z N 0 n N y���y. 2 n > > > > r ro O r O ' N N r� r� d r. O d N O d X O �a 0 r r. U r N w N o N Y N ' N N r N X O X U N C� x U tl N' N Y .0 e Z r Z . V� " �L) r n ��O{{ ,♦- N�♦- YF- .H a'F- a♦- rw a m ro na nw tl 0 r o E Y E a"( f E a E w- r A w tl a a a� n r. a z '0 "a '7 "'7 «J °J «J rN nd uN Yd .z ,E ,E .z «z rV«J « ii W .� LL z ZLL Q Y « « Y Y. d ..h.«t...�...F...f...r...f...f...f.a„.f...he. « tl M1 f...h...h...f...f...�...t...1X...f...f...h...h...f...f.Xr.f...f. Yi p. " a r N « N +, 0 X N r� N Y 0 « q Y N X y r a) N r. N N r � . V) N � n N m a � X N C.) tl � X (' N tl � « tl N (U r � . a) x N (U N r � � Y a) (U tl � . N N f � a 0 N a � r , CT Y N d m N ; N M « N w N '(D +� N " � m " m m " m w �, > 0/ 0) « 2) 2" 2 D) « d «, 2« [1 D. x d C r. a d d« Od r. d« D. « d m` C C C C C C C N ", N (U v N d Y m X m N a: `7 Y N X- O Y N Y N s N N Y N N " tl a m ry r m Y tl m " a Y Co a m Y tl CV a, ro m C: a_ 'W r nW rv1L *LL _ 'rr _ IL _ M _ 'r> _ W 'rr_ 'LL I a- a- tl- tl- aJ tlJ wJ W Y. «W b ;W ;W ;W ii Y. «� i 5 r X 7 R.0 r.p M ;- Y d Xi Q' Y Y 1 a M r tl « 9 N @ tl i X Q r` LP 0 Fn 0 N N N N LO M 0 LO N N d N N M_ O N 0 0 2 W W (U U C O .N 0 2E W W m U ti w0 "O 'o "O ;o ; "O aw O "O 'o "o W �,O 'O "o ;O "O "o ,o o "O "o "O 'o "O "o O wo ' O 'O °' o o "O ' o ' O " o "O "o ; O o O 0 "w "o 0 0O r 'O "o 0 0 "o o"o o O 'o o �,� o O p 0 ; O + O ; O ; O ; O ; O ; O « O r 0 ; O N O ; O ; O w O ; + w w a t N ryq 1 I I I # N N 1 1 tl M I M N tl 4 N tl M I M M F. 1 1'. tl 'i M I tl F tl 4 M I I I N 1 V N N N tl 4 M N M 1 I N N N M 4 0 N 1 N N 1 � 1 M 1 N N M i i M I I tl Y N F N M Y 1 tl i I N i i N M N M I 4 I M q i M Y M M I i 1 M I tl tl M fl II b M M i I 1 M I N 1 N i N to M i NO I W d' ;� M t � I I � M M � i app 1 tl� II N MSO F (D M M N i M N f t` W II M M p I f � i i h N F. W N 100 M co M N I M M 6M f N r Y p N pMj N � ti Y M I O Npp Q eO NlC'1 qM iM �ip FF` Ir iN i0 tl0 FAN tl(D MO Up YM iep IO 1(O M(D �� tl� MN I,p N jcD j {� Y N I I NI 1 tl ') r tl M N 1 M I q tl N tl M F 1 M r 1 N O It LO NI N t M I I� b i I K N 1 N I 1 N NI N i 6 N I N I I e e I M CD Cc �`p e C e 0 w C + O « C « O e C e 0 n C w 0 r C e 0 e C e 0 ; Q ' � 6 e (U e (Cl) N e N C N C n N C + N e Cw q— r q— e E— r f— « ♦-- " N— 2' ' 4 X fY + w � « + d' " e of w. + a � e � B « of� e. ♦— a r N— n a -,e elf� « N— e N— ♦—' « � e C e C e a� w d a a> q+ q e B r g« p r q e I r+ q q+ V e I o C7 rC7 rU .(7 .C7 w(9 +(9 fn (n (n + in + (n Cn , UJ a (n (n " 0 ` C0 @ 'S. w, + Y N " N y y p. (/1 ; (n M ", 4 n 0 Y ; Y a L ��o rCf) U) +U) r r w w +, + Y« N U N Y § N e y " N No «.. No w UCe aCO r N Qnnno ' N + N N + +' N CL-CL nN ' C + nN (n n +(L) m w ;w ° iE I` H HE2 0 N d N d N « ;a r N ;a N N « O N N r d e 0 e 0 a d , e d ry N U r 0 e N ru +v N N ry r + r +o n n e el ev U L ; ; r u w L ro « L e� r t wU +U e L r L r0 .1= rN +� +. uN °O +.N «O rN +(U +N +N +N +N rN wN +N +'.N eN «N aN Ur(4 r� +� «0 wf0 CO w d L f 4 cO Cl I) 0 N a N, W U) M O (O N C3) N CL N N M O N O 2 w LU m U c 0 0 2 LU w m U E E 7 co In c 0 N w 0 04 « M k 1 1 # o �., o r p+ p m p n. p X p 'o a. o 'o r p "o 'o p "o r p 'o Y p 'o k p 'o X p "o X o °'o Xo s p 'o X o CD "'o Xo °o 'o ;O Xo ;(D s0 »0 "„'0 ;.0 «o «0 r0 rp ;o «C up «O ;o ;O O ;O ;0 ;O ,0 ; ; r a 1 1 N i 1 I I I 1 6 # 1 I N N 4 1 I 1 1 W IN 1 N Y I I I N I I 4 N # o» C, 10 1 00 N p 1 I o I p fir? I 1p I NoNp # N 4''b C; � N_ N(O Io0 NCV 1� 1 Ip NOD bti 1 I i 1 4(n 1 N I N Io Ip 10 1 0 h X cc 1Iw M NN N t` Io 4 I� I� I M to i h Ip I p I� I Np I N IM G N It` pp M i� I Ip N N L N 7 I� 4 N I,o I+ Ip I(O 1 6 1co 9 g N p0 f YM 100 1� #N #(O iM I. (� IN I� N~ IM IM 1(n Y� #1� I� I Io 1 I'� 1 Ip Ii tlILO tlIN I0) iN 10) N(A d(A '...o XN 1..� 1 &�ti N @N # M IC'7 1 (p ((O N co I M I I` Yip III co 1� I 4p I N #Cb ` M I 1 1 1 I I I 4 1 1 i N III i h 1 I I I I I 1 1 » N I 1 1 I I N I I tl I I I I 1 N N 1 I d! # i N I I I N I I I 4 I 4 I w X xh •. N MIM M M 1 MIY M i 1 WIY M x I WIY N W k 4- M 1 MIM W w 1 N M�I M M 1 i MNX w Neje 1 I s V x'�u M M i MIX W M x l x x. Y x w 1 x�F x M 1 M F w M 4 W�X M iw xlr x. M� M M o� 1ai d aa; M� Wai 1:? °m ;is Mm m «(n ;m (i °a X(a 1(u Xm r(u ll� N 1 0N a•;d; ,X Oa k;r».^ y(oU wydo 5 �iyu N N "=m r ' 0 OOn O u1« jm� 0 1o+i� . f0+, �0 co co1O Z a Z � �1 Oa °o o o 0 o o o o 0 oa v 0 aa 0 E a E arEXElara+-"-O0 i o rn o ccc '00c -00 :3 :3 "0� Z Z 1 4 1 w�...r.e.f.w.fx..tw..twW,.t..M81wM,.hw..fMw.F.W.fwM.f.e.tM..tX,M.rwM,.fMMwh..ef.. ; d ; 1 « k N « N + N N + Cl) « » 0 + N d `m » m m m a� » `m a� " `D m m -.2 « o o» o o« o o N c 1 >0 1 >�> r >�> r >>� + N 0 N X O X N X 0 r N Y D tl N X O k N X N O X O X r.. O j j r ; ; E E 7 co In c 0 N w 0 04 Q ti LP 0 LO f (D N N N O O r) N N M r O N U O W W U c O U) O a W W U 311 Ao ag .g CD c / °' o o CR 0 O O .01 1 0 '� O I o 00O / o j Cb o 10 j o G i% j 0 1w0v o �o po 00 'N 0 O O O 1NO Cl r r j i N/ /i /iiia//i% I t o 0 4 o N "'� /%/i�'��//r om 1om No 0 10 oM (q CRCD I No Cl) I o N o I o ul C) y�,� � r� Ig l00 Io ti O//r �//,�1 % co M 1 0 l 0 1 0 f N +M I� /m f ro t o t o o tb j'° 'C (D, r` N �06o No to v kkl G I o ✓f/� !/�i�j/ I rl.. I o 0 0 � o �o o +o +0 0 ri 0 4o Io ,o mo«O Mo O « 1 1 fill d 9JI n/! a' M I O 10 I O 10 OM 10 MO VE / rJ� O I @ 0 1 0 0 � o N M 0 0 0 0 46 00 /j y t o j o °) "pip o IMMUNE f1J �/N� 0o 00 1�0o n co OOOMO"S (�O O NO O f�0 N _ _ • //lG�: Y I I i 0 Io d O I O i O O M 10o do 0 I 10 I M O I O N ._ _ O O Y / - r 1 I o I o I o 1 - �� ��a¢Io o 0 O - ._ .a --_- I I o o oo Ic MIOO m �. W l l v to o it r w lr o o o p I o fp C c lr o l0 10 1 I U C O �p ._�_-�_.ro.� �.�__r ro N o N o I ro O O t0 i j i `n I o t oQ 0 Ii 1 0 > O O O® I i oLU ca d /Vfr Oca .W <� U N i O CR ' Y N C O NO pp t O � CNII® nd o LO N q i r o 0.o I o 0 to a04 N I 10 00 - - -- .. j(a N o 0 00I °° o%ISNL ! 1 00 Oo 1v0 41, lf, ✓//0� +�// /� 1 " N I� No0 loo 10 ., o I� to uo to v ON /amV_. .OI OD O//, 0 co oq I N O gg '/'/ /o o 0%% r //j 0 O O O O p�/% I��f�f�f �O' �11 .OO O0 MNO lo iNNN ooO N1N oOO N N d PO OLd 1 O l O N O N o °' No Io N , l0 N OO o l 6„A N R y N O Ci o a.s I ry W o d I✓6� rn N 00 I'Mo No 0 080 lre" /// i' i/ rl G r> k o 0 M 0/ 0 t o 0 1, o o //00rLo O I Co l�U) ,0 �'�o•' I o� T o No No l o0 if �1fo Io Ivi N a1ilJ / -- - _ __ �o !r m o o m M co ,� o o Pp llHH - r - 1 w 01"N" 0 N0 o r nro / C w $0 Y o o a s ' JIM/ / LU i� 0 In RwiU N M� v u W-9 ti C)_ LO 0 N N a M 0 M O C)_ N V) (B 0- N N M 0 N a O w W ca U C O N v O 2 W W co U W I 1 N i I a I N N I N I N Ico rQ 1,Cp h w � iN �C4 n w� & M f NN I p # # 1 B 1 I 1 1 1 p r p N I C p p 1 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 tl 1 I N I 3 1 7 N iV 1 tl to p 1 C 1 1 1 cc), 1 # j 1 C N C_ 1 Op i','GtlY E E o ; r C', r � y ;U U 3 o E ;v `> at O d R L a C O !o CL 2 0. r N C 0 O d V 2 Q Q m Q ti 0 0 O O C 01 N d C O z iA N N N w qrO O c C d U) O C O z C) LO r r / O LO PTA 1 is I N YNT7 rN rr ti,r N wiicy10, ry cq ° f 0 M �p ;o;o (6 oo c� _ N rn v In O ui In r p o I p I I I I 1 II I N (O CO CO N W OD N W pU,) to O N O S$ N Ip N N y9�JM � I0 10 1 J N0 iii 4 p j/�%//r/��//i� O a O 40 I O O 0 Y O 1 0 to O 'O f0 N IN IN IN �N I L__ _ __ __ __ __ __ r__ �. r r u p u0 r p fp O r"C D I O �.� ,//�l���U O I O y o I o 0 �fl/, 00 ;00 100 r00 ;00 rvO uO eO rO rO aO O rO rO 1O NOy ��j�/� O) I r x r w r u r 11,6 cp ' eo "' co woo ' ti �, w ; °o �, � , °° 1 � ' °° r � ry °° r °� r� oo I ao /mg I � p � a co W %,� * p p_ I I N I I I f Y t M prrr , _ _a •. µN O- _I O •R Co 4 I I I 6 M I I 1 1 / ����� p 1 O ry O 1 O ( O I t I I I 1 ���Y/�/ /; Y b Y 4 1 I 1 '�/� In 1 0 Xi O C M A 1 �(IN ry 1 I SIM I I I 1 I 1 M 1 I 1 I R I I 0 O 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ( C; O n q I O O r� %' O 1 COW a 0 O i N. jf 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I l COD) f I I N 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 WI I >> Y ' p y 1 1> 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 M 1 1 032 I in 1 1— 1 O O �, 1 1 ,` I 1 1 1 q 1 I N I N 1 '�^y,.y I 1 1 I O 1 0 1 O I O 1 1� 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 0 1 0 1 �, 1 1� 1� �'� i� ' ic`J �� M � � N 1 I N 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1❑ W I I N 1 s^^ N 1 1 1 1 1 1 (V 1 I I 1 A I I� 1 d I }/ ry V1 1 1 1 1 1 1 (n 1 •� / �� 1 t 1 t CN!/ F �% 1 1= 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 �- 1 1 1 1 y W ( 1! M µ'' 1 +� 1 1 l y 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 s r .%J, 0 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 47 1 Qi 1 1 to 1— 1 I U 1 I C 1 1 N 1 d 1 di 1� 1� 1"" 1 I V I.— 1,C) O X11 % �"� 1 0 I c l U 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 &CL 1 (Q 1 E 1� irrr,, t I I (� 0 1 1 1 1 1 A 1 1 I G Q :u'� �U ;uJ ;U ;LL ;i9 ;0 .. :� :2 :� ::. o� oi. r a M rnIfis/ 0 c~ IO �� C I C C Y c / ,�l r O„ w LU 1 M o o U , V , U , c U m U C o U O, �f % m l",,5 P.3 ' m " m ' O p�'n ' m .O C L. T,. C7 ti:, N'% O V 7 C "IN f6 a _ — c js — 1 ,� yl 0 .6 �� D .0 'm !m ;m :a ...:d �� �� ' �� '� H Q ti 1p 0 O N a a 0 M O N r N M CL N N M r O N a O m W W ca U E O .N O m W W ca U N O U) N 0 D Q co CD .O m O cc Q: c c O N CD - CO CO N U L N U N Of M N N 0.. c ca N W m T N O O d 0 N M r ti 0 LO O N N N 0 U) M O M r N O f0 CL N N M r O N .0 O 5 W W m CC U c � O N •N � N = O 0 O C W d W Q m U N M CR It N 0 M O ID M O //� O N O O N a 'm', a t/ C. ¢ aD N O-- - co o �: ODD N Cl i oMo tz CID 0�i 1��11 g Cl o 1 rrf�rggJ a. a� 0 00 N O 0 080 O O U...00 to ��o to pj IN No 0 N.C6o �o r O M N O N 0 M O M a! / N0 NO NOCR cu O ti0 �Jy ail N c I ri CR CID Al 0 0 0 o NO 00 110 roN Noo 110 rl/f o N ro 1 00 N 0 00 r r V r ti 0 M 0 -- N 0 O 1 1 �� o�000 (V Cl) No Ico a CN7 qqo---., O i io o No 0 0 Cl)LU - O Y W No o O N m^I O C N --c- �c c f ,.N M gO M •N 1 /1 N� Np N Np o CID N tl (V 0 C 0 Y w N N * y M M U N M 1 it r V M M 0 LO M 4- 0 T- N (6 CL N N Cl) r O N a O W W m U c to O r N O W m W N U co ai I- LA O r U) O N a 0 In M O CD CV 0) N N Ch O N a O W W U c O (V cO G w w N U M +-' M 2 R ;o :v a o .0 e cri to o fo Io to o I O t o o o !o !0 0 o �o jo 0 m_r_.. o a co 0 o o o 0 I®I®® R ,® ;® � oo mo I® pre M o 0 o po Ao Io 10 to Iti tr LO Lv R o o a co 0 o o o o Io M o ,, N H C; �d 1,6 f6 r IS lo o mo ,o 0 --r._._._.r_�___ ;macaw w;;;s;w.w. OY 0 f� e® m m) r m O c) OO N O O4� O to o fu O cy O o c O O Cf 0O O N O H O o O O fD N O Ih O N O la O O N O 00 Ch M O fu O C') Oo M O M 00 a NO 0 O 00 N O 9 I- LP LP 0 LO 0 N a a 0 LO M O ti r N a7 f0 CL N N r O O r' N O -p N O � C w O w +, a v U :3 O N C O > U v � O c w w 00 m U et c7 N ti 0 LO 0 N a a ca 0 O OD cu N N M r O N a O 2 W W co U E O N O 2 W W m U r O N co .E- 0. a Lq CO) o o M co 0 C-4 C111 o v a I� '� rill/ f/ _ MO fY� `l'���% 0 to to o " O M p 1 0 '.O o 0 (V 1 / l o o � 0 0 fi 00 op Y 00 O G p N �J o o I ro ra ca 10 Ito 0 J° 4 p0 - o- I I- 1~ll Ht 0 0 o 0 o o 0 0 0 0 o 0 «�ww�r..wa�e : a lid s ;o ,00 00 �o 00 00 oU)q op Ld r ti i O ONN M M ti oN O !� 0 Np o Ip @Ir cu II pl: 0 I'p No 0 o Io Moo 0�0 0 0 00o �r^a �o ID sp r �o ICD �" do y� � 1j I m m Y � 100 0o No �o _r_ M o O P10 0 I 0 0 �l 0 ._---- --- WAiP w 0 Ao�'GO O 0 M ryry� (6 ICM M o_ O -,,p rel C] ¢" Cl) oo ai CR N NTYRTS, 6',r ry #A o• Min"ww"M p 0 1, resw ski -- ' N N fi.. C1 /li 5✓ ro i LU w LU CID 4) 0 M Q ti C) LO 0 N a a ca 0 U) M O O N N V) N a N N M r O N .3 O 15 W W m U E O .y N O 2 W W f U ti CD 0 N N N ai0 M O r N N O N CL N N M O O N O O N W tm W C U p c V 0 m � > 0 +� 5 t W v W m Q U to ch Q O r U) TlO N N N N 0 to M 0 N N CL N N M O N O 2 W W (o U C O O 2 W W m U Q M d d 0 0 o"o a o 0 0 1• 1 o 00 o �o o to a 1 1 0 10 0 1 0 o to 1 1 I o to 0 1 0 o to I 0 60 0 10 a� 1 0 0 10 1 0 0 0 0 o ao o ,o o ro 1 I 0 10 o I,o o qo o �d a o10 0 1 O O 1 0 0 1 0 I 1 0 1 0 0 1 O 0 1 O 1 C 1 0 10 1 O 1 O O 1 O 1 O 1 0 o to 0 1 O I I 0 10 O 1 O 0 1 0 Ca 1 O 0 10 0 1 O C 1 0 1 1 O 1 O 0 10 0 I C. _ 1 1 1 o to 0 1 O 0 10 1 o ro 10 l o 1 �a "E ;c C) ' //'; /'% '' ' w z, fD , M r , In u��/' "fpr. M M „ d' r , 'st M N j �1P/� N % ig 011 I �j 6 gi l/i' r..w..r..i..w..w. % y/i 11ia/ I / 1 c Y. IN arov, W O :ti nU, rM ro I� M / f1% r ME"C) o s o o o ` CD � ±, j �� r i i /' o,o rn O r O , C.. CS w• o, o w, O Noror eo,ao CYv + L,.� r o , ri 'r J y / CL po po qo �o to �o I 1 I 0 p Jf VM, N q0 q0 q0 q�,S p.N rf0 I B 1 , I O UO IM ICM a 10 r10 , 01 OIOiOIOIOIO O / ytn IM IM IO W� r �I of.O Oio O I O I O O I�E oN 01 oy OOl olO O � ' .f..F^r fw.�"#P. b•. .. I I r�oo rn r°rn r`„o eo p ; (D; co ; Ca ; oo Oyf'�aCucp..uodol0 �gpOlyogoq 8r! C? Oc 1. 1 I a a u� ( e o ao ao 1Qp 10 rs:o �� r �� d� W w.j 1 ui dap 0 ac C qui rco N l N o 1 I I a 1 wro�� I N 1 1 I N C l ' c N 0 10 a0 1 O N 0 10 10 10 ��i /% I f0 a co 1 1 (O 1 f0 0/ ➢f lp m w (A • 01• �' /� y 1 1 1 1 / fi� c s as W E P",/ �I ......�.NLL. co Co UC f%� a �• mrn.c� m: o o�� y a� Z c :� c. cn IC i; m m d u"s 1r v , m , o _ �/ I% N �.. � / % E o: L "7” l . C7 °a : w c to : �' // 1 1 an o� • I� : : > E a 0 co CLf m c ' as: E CL~ 85 � o . > U) U N I", M /%f :Uc.2 . . Cl) (O m 0 0 O era 0 0 N F O of to N ii k 0 \ \ q \ 0 % % 4) CL IN 2 'a 2 w & d / $ r- w & d �—�--/—}—� & |± ;o \ a |8 a r0 |§ / C,|/ ° B§ o|oo o lo § ° |§ ° |» to 1--4 'o |a ) �§ |) �( o co ico �c; ., o \ �\ }\ o .o |a lo o o |/ |§ /� . � { � o o |o to q |q �§ �\�— }— ® o | o lo § Md .� � | r | � — |o �/iq }—� w o |o o k :o | /� }\_� � �\ �\ � awj;njo.�no ■«:#]:;_:@; a) (D E ƒ :2 f 33 Ela)§ N N (Y) CD N 0 0 2 W W_ m 0 0 2 LU W_ C) 0 :0 0 �o :0 'D o *,o '0 ,o o :0 C! C! 0 C; No C; yo io 0 [o O 0 0 0 10 0 to 0 10 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 C, 01 10 C, 0 10 C, 0 0 0 0 1 R A L ... r ....... 0 0 10 0 to 1110 0 0 0 too 0 I CD io 0 0 0 C, o 0 0 0 110, 100 to 0 OO 0 0 C; 1 [ ---- r ----- ---- 1 0 10 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 OO0 0 0 O' 10 0 , C 0 Oo I o 0 C, 0 110 0 C3 0 C, 0 "C' 0 0 10 10 0 0 1 10 i 0 000 Ito 0 o 0 0 : 0 'o .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o ' 0 C! .0 N 0 ro 0 ' 0 CR wo goo �o 0 :0 :0 0 0 No to :0 1 0 0 :0 10 0 0 0 :0 0 0 q :0 0 Iq i CO=! I CRI io q 00 'OD 00 10 10 po 10 ci C; —_4 io 110 , C 0 0IN 0 0 C, 0 C, Io lo 0 0 C, 0 0 0 0 0 C! 0 R o Ct a 1 0 0 �I C5 i 0 6 F i 1 -------- --- 4- o 'o Is ci 1 C=! 0 10 0 1c; .... I .... [� --- r jo 0 10 to to to 0 -4 --- 4-1-- tooS 0 c N.o 8 o to 10 C; No C; yo io 0 0 0 0 0 ct 0 C! ttp 10N 0 01 10 C, 0 10 C, 0 11 0 10 i c, 0 Is ci 1 C=! 0 10 0 1c; .... I .... [� --- r jo 0 10 to to to 0 -4 --- 4-1-- co E (D"LL "0 . MW -C m 4� n tooS 0 c N.o 8 ISO too 0 0 11 No C; CD 0 o 0 A L co E (D"LL "0 . MW -C m 4� n N O r ul O N N N N N 0 LO M O (O N N O w CL N N M O N a O LU W U C O N O 2 W LU (13U 1.9i 2 C3 "o "o "o 0 o o «o eo so woo "o o so so so wo Mo ao o po to l0 po �o �o 0 No 10 10 1010 10 O N o p o o to 11 o ; o o No Io po 10 10 to I I N I I I o l0 1'0 to 10 10 10 0-.. ..0--0-- 0..�.._y„0... 11^0... I. _9 I! N. -I - - - 0 10 po Iso to po p.o o I'o 10 10 I.o N'o 10 0 cy�o O 'po 10 10 o o oo �o to Io Io O 10 C,0 10 10 O 0 I I I I p C; Io �o �oC. 10 o o ---,.1 .. ! -- -- -! ----�---- O ". O : O .0 " O ° O " O o "o o °o 'o 'o ro o so s0 so s0 s0 0 0o o «0 0 0 0 o .0 'r o u o 'o .0 r o .x..,,,,w.w.l,..w.xww..w �p..w.x.w•xyq.w-.-.-.w,p.x. x.x,p..m..x..aw�:.n„«.w..ar N I p I Ii I O po 10 Io to po Io oIoIo1N0opo & 0 G R yoo 0 10 Io Io o I,o to 10 p,.0 Il0 pCD I' q U pl N N o o so jo 10 10 po po 10 M0 10 0 o 10 10 �o 10 10 �o o CO, 0.o CO, Io �o I1 o N 11 U q o�0 10 l 0 10 oo 0 N 0 0 0 N0 J. pN 0 t . 0 10 oop0p 0 pNp0 0o ooo 0o o o- -o---1.o_ .... 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 C. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o ,0 No 10 10 1, Io so 10 I��o 10 10 10 io 0 0 R o j0000 o jo 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 R �o o o o �o 0 Io 0 o o--I'o--- i o �0 N o o o0 o o,o �o jo �0 S o l0 0 0 10 Io 0 0 0 i o 0 1 0 �0 10 0 C O # O 0 o N o o 10 '.. o r 0 ..o r r r r ro No q.o r r r r r'..C) m n o a - ---L---- L ----.L_ -, L,....L.... L .... Op O N m u C « LL 7 S :,2 r O r C r (.9a�0 u p u. Ili s- !C r C M O r._o A r� r VJ a "�Q Q 0 LO 0 N a N N f0 0 Ill M L._ Q N N N N a 0 /fi i �%/i� o a o w o o % a o o + �A Nr� vooo 0 o pD ooooo- y10 0 Y cs 0 0 0 0 N _� -_ -- - - - � ------. too �o o �o o go �0 // o 0 0 0 0 0 o O ++ f�� %�� o No �o Mo �o �o (o O O O 1 , /pi 1 N o 1,oLLJ ��--- �1 ��� o !o o No No 0 �.// tri 0 0 0 0 o po i Ll.l ��/i% �i� i o to bo to No 0 M 4 q A 1 G ao �o yo to 1ti ODOD jj 1����. o "o ro, �.o �o 0o iro �., ��,. �✓ i /� r ao a in N 1 �i 1 P 9 N 0 +d//Ii////�/ t VE otic cu +E m W <C // v > 9 j/ Ys �, Of E o p �•- W C r / a N N l0 3 V C m c N N 3 d _ %%�i� ti %�%� 2 v iro .j N m w 7 R' o U ch acs — j / u, If % ¢ 0 r ti 9.q O� N O N d O M CO O M O 10 ci ro CR ti 0 F i ti LP 0 LO 0 N a a cu cu 0 LO M O 00 N N rn c� a. N N M C) N O 2 W W M U C O N O W W CB U 09 ch o Xo w0 o .o Xo Xo ao o +o ti r r o 10 to qo to fo 0 0 o to to lo`r ooa r J O O �,OO O O 0O NO ? Ia a /€ O IO llO Ip IO �p -_ •� ��� o �o loo�i�o-OO01'�OYpMOMOd fLO O O O O OMW -__ ..� -� ___ ._ .---- ----a--- i� o Ido io �o No �o - C� o to to Io to Ibp laoo °aOo c6 cd DD A X Y 1 1 i 'O 'O rN iA a) - � X T �i ,9 Ev rn � d •� > X E c Ec l?LU wm E d Lim a o Q M D ' .c a CD � , U3 ❑ X 2 o0 C3 W ' rn '!p ' 0 O f0 o o ao ao Lir �, o .o ao a� � _UY ;i o fo 7777 f� o0 o go o io I f. ® I0 / I tl L% , o I o%� _ _ _ Y / _ �.__.. %�' f /��/f%%� _ _ �_ .... _ & i I /prif%/%�// o o I o t d N j oo 1c0C� �%i�� I �����.... o ---No �o loo 00 C%4 mo-'�"co O Noo '�o /��%� N f� 1 i%% i o® ®_ N ---- �! i/// o l I V �' 0 �l�y�//a.. o t o I c� b eo ao co an Ian �f�//' �/� 9 I 9 ��� 0 1 o I o l %�i r 1"f ifs �11//%G%jr%%;✓/ // �/% N' oo 0 I ®0 iN - _ aoo No ryO (D O D OD CO rqg 0 U) I an 0 .-- ' oo ". o / ao �ll o 0 o ao 0 o o /r o 0 0 Day IO OO Oo C, 0 O llN C, Mocoo mC3 ui/Mwr ui� 4 �r%a t o Y o 0 //,zl Y J +a o o m e7 1% r I00 I� � c" Ig loo No 0 o o I1 kaA �! 1 IS 'i; rr, 1 l N % %/ f I f t I cu N// ----w ffI,'%�/ I l I� 0 0 O 0 O 0d 0 I N CA o WI qq+0/ O 0 NO an j an I�O% I _ Lr) ui - --- // 0 0 0 co o N® Io NNo No / l NO 4NO �Il �/ Y 1 NM M ulr m M ilii✓///// 0�,...-lo Nati ui `, an i ui / 11 All rf /ii f f I 8 C2 o 10 1 y b 00 '00 O O l N /Iiiflr it an a r 1 01 10. R C!tl un ari • �%�/iii 9��///�6 ✓lt�ri 1 �i �,_ - CM /J/%ar / W <o //� �r /,C5 0 C) ,j,r! /i/ 10r i rn 1. oo 1-6 rm IV O " " wo ,t,� Io Io s Ito LO UC - 'o o I It Y oll 0 n o/fi%ji�O / AW �%Iti o C=; o 0 0 0 0 VI a i%/' Qd E / om �E �o L) „UE aaG F- rto 0i 01� N r_ N/ f U / i '// Q Lf% N I �! � 1 i ' /o OO ' O ti O w 0 O OS O O O t 0 R O r t0 MO ep O__Tw i o ko o0 Cl o o �Io o 4 i ---..�'__ I C, to ioo joM ti O1 10 r 0 0 �M vi to l 0 o to loo loco 00 OM OO O o N O N O 10 p0 II 1� A 61 NI l0 jo 0 �o 0 0 o t o t o I m o 1 0 t o i N b N 4o No l Ji0 j%///N %/i 1 O C; IIIo 4 ip Ip �No ci '...NO _ No Nui N /W 0_ N 0_ N Q ' V Oyyy� O O y0 �O U) N �O MINE O N IJ aG% Is, O MO �O +O O y0 h0O O �oi///%l: �O �O If) M O 0 M O CM CD IL N N CM O N O 2 W W C6 U C O N v O 2 W W U 4 0 O 0 0 O ----� _.®_y ----1 ---- jp O ® I0N C, ioo 00 O 0 0 I i I vi to l 0 d0 4 p 1'OM 1100 OM OO O o N O N O 10 p0 II 1� A 61 NI l0 jo 0 �o 0 0 4o No 5o 0 to Iv loo d 0 ip Ip �No ci '...NO o I No Nui N �_ U a02 ----� _.®_y ----1 ---- jp O ® I0N C, ioo 00 O 0 0 I i I vi Tui o N 0 0 40 I �I o 1. bo 1 rn to co o - - w ---- 1 o� N o N� r l0 jo 0 �o 0 0 O i 0) lo o l If, O o ti o o o o O II ,c ID T�icz ,E CD �_ U a02 Q ' V Q ti 0 LO 0 N N N O (6 o�g 0 o g ;g �g o 0 w 0 ,� ca o r o . o r® o O w 0 r 0 0 0 o o o �0 10 0 0 0 o f 0 0 0 i o b o F o 0 0 i ���� o o 0 0 0 N l0i0 10 @0 �0 0 �r ` M, Po S 1 nj �� _�'r - _. r___s CO o io jo joNo jo jo 0 0 10 0 10 10 l0 10 0 O �� 0 l0 40 l0 10 io 10 0 N f '� 0 1 0 11 0 1 0 1 0 l 0 0 0 I N mm M w I� l / p y 0 0.... O ( C.I j o 1 10. o ��, 0 l00 0 l0 90o 0 0 Y I1 1 0 0t 0 c O 1 ww ww w 0L' "�, Ow�Oµ p O •-/� o 'o J p��✓f, o ro ro ro io r0 ro ' _ a,� ��" c ". c� u�� � Em °cmas "� awa o I°' " � w o ° m to 0 Op r� +uy i r` 0 LO 0 N a N N (0 0 LO M O N M N 0) N IL N N M r O N .0 O w w m U c O O O LU w m U fflJlr� o N g g ; o S iGrJ 0 �� O o 0 0 P 11 r, 1rr 0 0 "����0 10 Io qoo to - o Ip �o o IIINo 0 0 "o UK o o �o o o 0 10 0 "O fl��...o O0 1O PoO No 10 0 io 10 0o0 0 C 'oma.'Ern CD 1",LT' xs 3' N m a �' O' S 1°— rri Q O O ® ' cr, W_; ti 1p 0 U) 0 N a a N .r M Q U) M O M M N CA f0 a N N CM O N O W W ca U C O N 0 2 W L9 co U d 0 U 1 1 D to 1 O 1 O ti Lp 0 LO 0 N N N N (0 0 M O It M N (0 IL N N _M O N O W W <0 U c .O cO G W W t0 U o ' o o ' w o ` o 0 0 Cl- •o o +o o o o o do �o - -�o ro ro I o Ro �o Io o 0 oo �o to Ilio to oo o _IcC. ! �o .._, C_-- f ��, -- AFF -�-�' � _�... .�_.• ...... ' o �. o 0 90 �o o 10 Mo �o Jy, 90 Ao 90 to �0 90 p � � ; p u p � p X p I ---- r - - - - r � l .. o io �o 10 10 to �o �0 940 0 o �o o qo IIo o �o o °p rno rro ro rro ro r r r J rl a r r r�r r " r r r r r r----�----�----� L ---- L -- - 13_ G1 N (� m Ol y N 7 • l0 �d r� rc E•� goy N N 7 r a r m N • 7 0. ��!C�� N. r U1 7 i ii ' 0 .S c c cm o H y- rn2 ,In c N C �IOld (7 U O O `amu 0 C. 0 0 0 C. 0 CD 0 0 0 0 0 O F ti 0 U) O N N N N c. N 0 M O LO M N N W ao o o vg/m 0 0 0 i r� `f� t JJl oo M000 to i® NMo oo o o y 0 O M%1�i o iiiiy o to M o M o M o 10 OMo go Io kp 10 4� - t oo o y, (0:1 o M o Wy'�o �o �o o W o I� to N, o o #o 0 M IQ ®e �o �o ro �® �o '10 ++ ayi %%' % D rn d v E m Qi / // C O N lL N w W :a r ���� 1 ����. y �' i— V m d of e ' i d U N a C7 Ocaa o OO �2 //�l l%i Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G CL M M N In Cl N LO N N co 0 (D M O m 0) m CL N N M T- C) C) N 0 O W W m U c O N O 15 W W m U N v W V V L U r V .O a Ny t4 N D V C J r 0 : 0 : O : O 11 T I N Y o qo '0 o:o :o ,o :o .o Nv m +O c) NM W (O ,L 4 Lco .(0 IIN N N. 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I I I I 1 I I N I f h M 1 yN 1 CO I iN I �0 I I �(0 NLO M M o N 0 00 N ,N ,N ,N , W ,(D N O EO B M1 10 I 1 10 1 1 10 1 10 Cl) 1 Qi t a y I I I I 1 I 1 I A I O_ 6 1 , N dLL I N d ad-. L 1 I , , • � 1 •' C � Q � C C� Q1 6 1 I Q 1 I j Q d p' 02 c N Cl) 0 , co 1 0 I N 10 1 0 1 0 1 m I C I O) N U) I c N O �, Nl O Z G 0 y 0 1 0 1 0 I p 1= O « 1 1 1 1 I! N O N O N d d c Q d t fn C V C y v V N m c d o :1 m V m U CD C 7 :� p� L L OD . O O co V '4 F O IL , :'E :p. Iy F a) ;m ;E LL c N ;C C, c ; o �, :~ Q (n (D pCD la C N E O y .C7 +L+ .d.r = N a Oa G 7 M M N LO T" Cl N LO LON N O (D M O N O (a a - N N M 0 N 0 O w LU m U 0 O w w_ U fa O T Q 3 O O 0 O O E 3 E X ca E ca N ca N E ui CA O CD .N to E c N O U C C U o 0 :, O > C Z ) O Q o N N C > O n O c 0_0 4: U 4? n U U O o m inO O (a r M a f U) ti U ca D E d a) J E E E Q Q Q LU w w O O O 4L t� 4L 0 O O C O N 0 Q O O z �n Q H N U .0 N El m C 0 N N Q O 0 z N 0 Cn O N C 0 co E N C O US 0 z rn C ca O U N El N M E N C C O O tN N Ea) m Q O Ca 0 O C a N Q ca O N 0 ++ z Cn C T Q cm CD ' ca w CA c 0 U) CA E N C O N (D Q O O z 1 a) fA O 0) C O O7 E fa C O 'O .0 N C C'7 O It N 3 c0 G Q U N U C N Q E 0 to C N fA N Q N c O m C O N m c 0 E Q a3 w ca 0 4 O C O U 3 ca C O U , e , r « "c "o ;tom ;o ;o ;o 'o 'o CD O "o eo rvo 'o 0 o 0 o ho °o «CO «CV «CV «.. CV «CM « M h to lam Ica lei t0 Lo I4? Ire Ica Ian go tl0. e �o Hca �o o , N tl i 7 B M N :a yo I j� 1 o !o !'c3 ! !a�3 �o to lam Ica lei t0 Lo I4? Ire Ica Ian go tl0. e �o Hca �o o , b � I N II I I pppE 1 m ti 15 a �3 ma cca s cu re3 c� a Ol A,a Sa r r r [aa a rsa ca 5p + 'T. n ." CL a c c r c c E E E «E «E E WE 'E c a _q a?- e ¢a ..� m ca, o. ca :L '+0" • ".3 r COQ"' r e0 ry «su e�3 e. , h�3 ,� "a3 rv� ,�a .� a ,0 rvn3 ,, ;E E E ,.E ,E .E .E E ,E ,E aE , w..F...f...f...f...h...f...f...f...fww.f..,.t.w w .0 e o e o h o . o o o o. o o h o rn rn 'orn ; «. « 0 . d u. d r d r d a d a d e 2 ..Q. [1 n. . G r d. ZW x 01 r cr . Q e. Q ° 0' . 01 a 0' a 0' " fW J , fT Q , rvLU ".W-.. " N "W r. LL " N ° y e!L "' iA eLL " (A eW N +W " N "rLL ' N ' N ' C " C ° co " c ° C " co " co " co o " C '0 " C ° c °U °U .0 'U .0 '0 "0 .0 ^U °U ;U 7 M M N r O N a n 1 I N + 0 M O M O r 0 w 0 n X O r 0 ➢ . O + I.O. « O « O C) d , C C e C , C C ..0. n C r C r C .,0. n C a C N C w C X p « O n 0 e 0 x N n N I N « CO '� rv. « w a �. n '�' w w V e V U x co M W n co N n O M Cl! " r m p m p aCD a. + X N N m N '. N ry X N r O Y O X X. n a + N " N Y r 'D I— .I— F H aP a •». .11�_..a:..p.. �.n rr x.xx✓�wr-....�w�...�..r:..,....r.�n w nnM.w.w�r.w,rwrrwrlw M w d�._--�_...�....®...sa�..,r,�,.w.wwww,m�..r.xrr.wre�n.e....L.. f �..._....&.........ymr,.rn.r.,�n e 11 M nrn.emn..�X �n,vn u�w.nurnmm.w� ww....l�.r..r.-�.�..m....� .. . m I i 1 f k N Iii pIp I I ! ! N N L It It i I N G I11I 1 I W q I I # I V II # I I N N k 1 # I I I II N 1 N M I 1 I I I L S N I I I I p I I # & L 1 CM 1 O� N 1 1 0 1 m# 1# p# p) Y 1 p� N 1 O� p I•— I' m` I p Ip 1 # o O C . co q y 1C 1 Ip IC 119 LC 'k (0 Nc I f0 IC I w IL IC i N &L IC # 10 1L #C 1 m #L IC 116 #L ac IV N 4L I I 1 I I p N Y it 00 #RAN 1 # Np I N o I p 1 ko I p 1N 1 0 I p I N # Y lf) O #N, p at aU NL 0U tt IU IL IU &L LL M1',U AU 9.0 IU NU NU tU N NN #N I� o NO No IpU #o to IO yo to io to #o N 0 1 I f i Mcp W #� I+n Na IN N 1 1 ;Z #o 1Z IZ IZ 1Z WZ IZ #Z IZ iZ #Z # I 1 # # I # N �Z N 1 k M # N N b W 1 # I 1 1 It 1 I 11 N # N I 1 # I I 1 1 1II 4 N I I I I 1 I N 1 M1 I t I I'. I N i I I I N 1 # N N 1 I 1 # I N IV # 1 1 I N I # I N .� ...� I ...} I ... N „ » 1 + ...M 1 ... I , . # 4 ...$1 & I .4...II I U ...$1.. I I 4 +, ..1,--4 p, I N . +r 1 .II ...iI 1 ...II 1 ...II I ...� I ...� I ...� # ...� 0 N + ..� # I ...� ...� I ...y N . . Q: tl @ CLOM ^� w C Y( 1 (D N(D R ,a) aQ N a � r0 IQ wQ k.Q ; d N a O r ro r_ x R Q I Q tl 0 Q a W w. - " W r W w N I N n N a, N r C Y C . C 9 ,r ryi= P Yr- r ,P rF H Ii- +1— «P ri= E E E E y y - - - Q Z I Z I Z a Z w f6 r (0 « r (O N N y a (0 r y r 0 r y Y �p m y + m I O« r O) «a «a Xa ra ,a ma ra ad "J IJ rJ N a ; Z + y w w ...�...f...r...h.r«.f...f...f...h...r...r...h...F...f...h...r...r«..f...h...r•,.r.,.r+'..F...r...f...f..N,rr«„„t.. w X N « w i r a «' + C O n C + O ' C 1 0 C O C Y O ' C 1 0 ' C r 0 ' C 1 0 + C O C O C O C O C O r N I N I N a a) « N X N O « O N rw N e N w. N f6 M N f0 N w to N 'fd1 O, N e N N �. f6 ” N n f0 N a: co N w 16 N r f6 N f6 N m f0 ' ” " Of m m« m L '+ L ' L CL ''' l. La- L L L L L L L L N N N 2 CC - c C "�"�a°"�L C C C7 C7J 2`J 2 +pI�C •WNUn7C 'yn�C I+«X,r 'aC 'nC «l,, 'aC II,' nC 'aC 'a 's a a •n .CL U a J e i� er;N1 Q ,,' 7 tl J I 7 j Q ` ` ` ` ` I` r"e 'IC C dI W w W y W «y W W y W I+ yy W Ird. LL IiNy W +« rtlr W rtlIyC ' C 0N " C +' I N"N C N` W CI W W y ,� C C I+C C C I 00r O e O 0O0 u «I5 O ,0 VV'U,UVVVU'oUUIn ,O O O IO O O O O O O 0 9 'OOa22U°UUUUU n .p n a Cl) M N cr) r O N_ Mn N ai m 0 (O M 0 N O cu a N N M O N 0 0 2 W W NV 0 C 0 ch c0 G W W Ma U Y ' X r d y X ; h " o " ' "o "o "o 'o "o "o 'o " o `o "o o " Yo o ^o 'o " o 'o °o "o 'o "o Yo "o "o 'o "o ^o 'o 'o "o 'o "o o "o " o "o ' o "o "o o "oo 'oo 'o 'o "0 «o 40 o "o ao ,o ,o ao wo 'o ;o 'o 'o 1.o �o :o ;o ;o ;o ;o ;o ,o ;o �o o ...... -N.....,...,�.. ...... � Im...«..y.._.. Y N � .. i®..��.�..�._,�._......�.,__ � �.®..®.p.m......�..... � I N 1 4 3...7... liltr........�..a....,�.,.._�..,...�..o. M I 8 N N N N I 4 I M N I M N N W t N I I A N M N IN I N 9 ! I N N W I N 6 N N I W N I i I� Y N a0 I Y N a0 I N I I N M N A N I I� M I ap I I NI p� M N N F I dl � I Ql V M N O) I N MoD I p� M N M M I� N N I N M� M N I N f0 M *"` N 'w"; N O NO? I L N Cp I m N N i Wf � a d' N yo0 II M� &� 91Q NM NA`^C i(D Mf0 I N� M IV Iti d� AM O NM'? NO Iti 6� Ao0 (� O Nr,y dvg 11N M1(O IN W11) Pto ID7 Nria Nom) Ns N4 �� N N �O �O r� icl, N� Mti N Nj� NMCb I 1d' I N V N N j. V W I� to c"wN I, N f Y I N poo M� N Iri ,omm^ q�q yNy I I III I I N 0 tl M. N I M N' I I I N I N C N 1 I N I N N N M M & I N t I N N M m N I A I N I M N ro I I N Y N N m I N N A, I N N N N r I I I M N M N N M k M A N M I N W Ni II I A M I I 4 E N C M. N N I N I N I M II I I 8 M N N M M A N M Y r F I N I I I I M M A 1 I AI I N I N I i d r N W a) 'W a ) I.dM n C.eN YW M .W °W aroW Z r Z MZ w Z Z m W Y M 'W W "W 'W "W "W " k C7 r C7 r C9 LL ' MT ' r,yl M.7) ;,. r N rN V V YN V y « x� ° V yZ "V °� � a04 '� "� °� Y� "•� 'C yn„^,YYV^ rN nN aN y NN yNN «�N "� "� '~ yNN— eIN— w� r w Z y Z r Z r Z ro XCz M A,Z y Z r, Z Z x. M n. .. «H .. y~ .. f...f. h...�...h...f...t...f...F...f.. f. ..r.».t.«.fXy..t...h...f...f.. f...Fr..f..wr...f...h...f...f...�.. A n y " ' h N N N N qfY �, N N y N N N ' N N N N ' N N N Y N M N m N N y N N N N , N ; , ' T' T' T' T' « ' " T" « « , T' y T° , C31e T' T" T . Y >.w ,,.. '�.}) T' " r m ' ' m ' ' . ' m ' MT ' m ' ' ' 01 " M31 X ' MD) X 2) m v 2) N �, 4) °... N " N N " N N « N ' N " N " N N N ' N N ' U) N C ' N X N C d C N , C N , C d ; C N C N C N w C M d C N C '.. C ", C u C C C M C C C W C W e C � w. C , C , C C C C W W ,W ;W ,W ,W ,W yW ,.W yW ,W ,W W ,W ,W yW ,W ,W W y yW ,IIJ roW ,W ,W ,W ,W y.� as «Z y 4 r Y Y a M y tl 9 Y F 7 M M N r O N to a N (0 M O U) N (3) N CL N N C'M O N cO C w w U C O O w w m U w r r O w0 'O a0 'O 1 e r0 "O "O 'O M w0 «O �,O w0 r O w0 �O n w0 'O a0 w0 n0 wp 1 mp ISO w0 r0 aM wN pM �N "O) "w w(0 � X X b0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O p O O O p O O r 0 0 w p N p N p N p N p p O p N M N O O p p 0 O 0 r x r r x rM w « ra I w X r e w x m e r e x X X « w r + x + + w rt 1 e b P b a r w k r d I N Y W I I 7 Y I I Y I I N k I I Yi W I I I r I I M N N W I I I1 1 I I I N I I I I Y # Y # I I W I N w N o { N r N I p I p Y I r p N N p W W O I Y O I N I� N I tp # O I LC")! IN I 1 0 I O 10 G M I O # Cl) Q V I N I O p u 1 N I W0 r C7 10 IM I Ip I I p # 1 Iof 10 Io0 I), C I� I YN 10 I IO I� 0 N'� #0 I� O Y� 10 (M WCV I� Ir— Ia? it I� W0 N I I� k.O N(1j IM N(O IM Ito M M Y N I N N N W W I I Y I I I I I W r N N N I I I I I I I I Y W N I I 0 # W I N N I Y N b I I I Y Y r I r N Y W I I I Y S I W f I I «ww.f wwnv�wwww�nww w�r w.ww�w ww�ww.�.ww�.w. w w�wwaa�rawwFwaw�.w.w r w�xwww�ewww�rwwa�r,ww.�Yw..�«.,waw�w 1' w..w�w...�...�.w.�w,w w. .�'ewww�r.ww�w .ww}www w 1 1 B M Y X� 1 w m x N l y Y M w W (Q X m u li "C� X (a Q' r (6 li n r O s N e D w " N " N r. [6 I w O C " N a C e C °' O e 0 C O C X O w a T w }j„w r X. > e X] Y r Y r U w tq r N N M r a r. tU Yz N « 0 r. O 0 o C) n x 0 ro OJ r 0 r O) n U r 01 IU OI r 0 r 01 r. O r. m X. O r m } w w f6 w p w ' 0 r (� (� n� N N N N N N w (p N w (p N x 0 X O C C N C e 0 C « M e X "= Y I r 0 X D r1L r 0 r[L r 0 w 0 r 0 wUw w. r� a w (j r 1 U w x (j r e U r r U X X (j r r U C O w r w. N X N X N b e a) .� U X U X U e r Yv r Iv Z Z r,� w o xp ro "� C9 XC9 XC9 rO x M e ss em Xm XU Xv Y� r� -.0 «� I� ME rn J J J J way r v r� e� `7 i `7 X N X N Y a Y Cl- r Z X. Z w E w Z w Z�. U r �. r I J X J 0. >> M rLL wLL w wLL XLl. r� r N M] w 0 w Q r w� XQ rQ wZ wZ »� M r X n 0 " O U-)° U) X O ° U) + O w (n «ww.fwwa�w...f...f...t...t...h...�...f...t...f...f...t...t...F...f...f...f...f...F...f...F...h...t...t...t...r..« f Y b e Y tl 1 X M tl f q 1 tl p r X y r I N y w d N b. N b N e N r to 1 0 N O N w 0 r N I N y r. N to X N W w N " N r N w 0 r N w a) w� r N r N r N r fT r. (OjJ w y w y X y r y w ro y x y r N e V X O x w a ch w N w .O. w N b .0. w N T« O T ' O) ; 7.r� Of I. r x « r R r rmu r D I . r r• X O >+ O O wn ae N d O. yQ i ; CN + C Ll4 '�OO IU v7 I x N M (6 w (D r (9 Y W w f6 n c9 =0 W W r W 1� wu Q wLL n� rLL rLL r� Icy �—y , a uJ rJ x_J rJ IJ wJ wJ_ U q� ry� x� r� rD) wa y� d (O M O to N tT M 0- N N N M O N O 2 W W m U c 0 0 2 W W cc U O x I x Oo ««O ' " i n O x«O A«O o o M:Co o O x° oOOOOOOoO C) o0 0'0 o oooo ; ; O o o o o o :Oo o :O o o oo +o + x r d I Y I I Y I d I I i I N 1 I I I I I N ib I I N r I r I I N NN YO k (°4 Noo IM i� l A I I ph I 4M I Ip O I yt�- N loo I III Crib I co N I I N IN NM d p ti I Y� iM IIS I, t` N �? IN Y M YO r ti I� I t`, l� cNi I l I�M pr N 10 I� a) ,�I.N N X<n I IO l Iti I ? l ry M dN I 1 IN II 6 IN r I I IO d ei'a N r rix PM I ti I I";, N t3) IW NO 1. 6fD i N I N 1 NO r� NO I ti IN N� PoO) I IV ra:tl IIS NcD IN p4Cti B� Nra SIM da— Poco 1� CO a Ia0 1 I r 1,— �l l� 1 I r N� 1 WN N I r I 1 1 d NI do I a r� Iti IN Y 1 1 I I 1 l I I 1 I ro � i9 I I A r I U N N I y I N N I I I I 1 N I N 1 p I I N N Y Y 1 I I 1 A Y N A I I I I I & Y I Y & N N I d I I I Y N I II I I tl I I I I p N I I Y I f..w�,ww q I E...�...}.. I I « I �.. �w.w�ww �a.w.�.. F..rr�r.ww�.w.}...}...�,..�«..F...}www..w}...}.,.}...�...}...}...}.. I N Y I I I A A : : 0 X c X c : ,ia X +1 a a 'C', � «ca '� , m 'IY o LP r o m r o m X x+ X o C r C r C H " F- r ' ' ' I-- ' F- ' F- " ' I— r. I— I r x I : « a) N a) « I? N ®. d aAv O � X a) '0 r a) : I "� X 9 , 1 «ai X I � tl A � ,� rug u� " 'u� to 3 r a � :� �' «_„�� o "� m '� m '� rm xco '� "� x� x� X a) ami ' o� x + �u�i X X ' - ,- « x� n _ -: a7 X O r « r X A X O ° C X O " C r 0 a 0 ' C a 3 O r 0 'V . � a L3 « r U r U . U) : ^ , a ..h««.f...f.,e.F«..f...�...f...F...f...r...f,..�,.. p...f...r...f...f...t...F...f...f...f...f. ..fww.�...frr..f x X + X y Q , y w. Q y Q ' y " y ' y x Q r Q r Q ' y r Q ' y r Q ' y ' y X Q r Q ' y ' y y ' y r Q r Q Q r p_ y + y + y Q a Q cu), r Q + y r d t : N «I— :H m„ m m m m m m r m m: ca A m" ro " a) a) x a) m o X a) X a) Xv X a) x a) Xv Xu X a) X a) r6 Xv �_ «�_ a o «o r r� x x� r ru m :�_ "�_ 76 X� 'o «�Xv r -(,-D- + -5) r t ' L "G ' L + L Xv ' L ' L ' L ' L a) ' L ' L L r L a) a) o, r m " L x L " a) r a) L a) M1 L « a) ' L ° a� cn ; � � " a) r � r m m a) + a) m a) m , /� Y. /� q x p A a w M a M M N U) r O N N N 0 CO M O N 0) (o CL N N M O N 0 0 2 W N1J cu U c 0 O 2 w w m U 0 o ao o 'o Wo mo po `o o "o w "o o r "o 'o C; ;Ci ;Ci ,o ;Ci „o ;o ACi ;o r « ",'o ;Ci « ;o ;o a ;Ci ;o A " « w r W q { N I I 1 f { W { I I I d N I I P 6 1 Y 9 { 1 N Y I I I M M aD � r 6) M 1 q I.CO Y �' I�,� yy W� IIN u 'd { N 1 N Y { q I I ( 1 1 I I I I d 1' Il d d d of) r ti «O Y tn { S { {w '{N I Yo IID N N h N L M { b� A Itn I 1� II � @p �{ d o dC) { { O I(O 1� O I (O M "h r Ifj IIQ { {N II`- qh IM I 1 � I d� N V {N {O I? I. V {N d0 {� N {� N I0)!A N M o to d 0 {� I M I I h Y I c0 9 I' VI f Y I'm I m " M { h q (fJ { I N I C N { d N N I I p I I I III { I I I tl 4 @ N I I I d M d I I I N N II m .� .. ... v . w x r ...�....� . • . « ...... .. d" w. 4, rw .4 z 0 rn w m 0 « O w a e e 0 u a r r T a r n N + co « n r co r e 0 r C r U U T C) a N r co « y y r y ° N co w. r 5 N . O s. O a N " N r> y a>> N a>> r r C U e C r W r � CD e O « O r °., p p j j a >0 c` p) x u « Z r r Z r� e e y e r U e e 0 a + O dp ,O 0 ,O xO e0 1 ,E u. e- ''o «- +N "0 o «moo v «a a a ;0 o Z «0 aZ 4E «E o «o «o Yo 0 c wp m,p ap Mp Yp p a °Z Z ' '� '� o« o a s r n « n m • t « N CD r y « ma> r y «( « m « y « m r y r m r a) « e y N o «'o .9 «.2 ;.2 ;.'o .'2 cri j ''0 �l O r 0 y. O r M r O n o « O e N " O r N « O e N O e N e O � w y L C� G E N N O N .E W 0 N a_ M M N LO r O N N O (0 N N Cl) r O N O 5 W W ca U c O .N N O a w W (6 U rm G 7 M M N O N U) N ai 16 0 (D M O N N N M O N a O m W w w U C O cO G W w ca U m c C >Z m O O d r O N C N :3 ea o 0 0 40 ry o I a @�o p0 o 00 ® O o O O 0 0 C; 'moo Io o 1 �o n ~ . •. _ . 10 C..... p op po 0 MOS® 1Mp f0 1® IN k0 op O M p N r Cl) q 0 1 0 O N N � I 1ao I O qo I O Lo $ O Io 10 W)4� 10 10 @to- 90 10 Ilo coo a w N m m I O 1 0 N O 1 o ql O o m N Iq'W 1 1p �'p V 1 CO 10 I'. Ip I I 10 III aoo o o o o o O " « « . O , o « o " o " o O w.w•w.wy"..re..w.w-w�.r�».a,.w,.rr,n.w•.wna.w{gw..w:.w:.w.w, 100 O 1-0 I O 1 0 d , No l y to io i'o $o Lr; 1 ti i I O i I O i 1. O k N � i0 l0 l0 l0 d No O 1!O IO o Np Ci In 0 0 10 0 LO Y N io p I I G I o o � SO. M Ip f ,O I ;p I o pp O M M 0 I 18 I N1go I 103 M O o `S o O �__,_ N __.r 0 0 ____'r�.__.__ I 10 10 1 10 to 1 r ---- 1 10 10 1 10 1 0 0 0 , M0 O 1O Z0 10 M 0 In 10 10 10 10 N 10 I I o 1 I d 00 go 0 R o o 0 La o0 «n r 1 IN o 0 o rn so o i' Oco 1 o o O to O 10 0 1 Yy 1 r O O A r 0 k m o Ln o II o 0 o o e 7:LM 1 waA:::::: T a " Nm � 0 « N " l0 p 1' W O w 0 ® Off W Y O «p ry O "O O O m0 « 0 ^« O s « co Mnj N // /i r/r,F q o0 60 to to ov M %% ✓ /i d� 1 .. mwi i 0 0 0 '000 r�j RS, �j/// N I p ti j�� 1��� o- I`' 9 0 0 0 N ri U/i I 1 00 co i0ro j0 10 t0 0"� 00o `M0 10 10 1'o r�0 C6 1 I III N 11IM 10 tO 1O � Q NW,I//��i N 1 I O dl O I O to 0 1 ob 10 10 10 10 U)I to w0 06 O 10 10 a00 J�',L✓��i ���r�%i��rr/ii Nro E1� p oOo t 0 o0 N1 oo vrr 00 -o 0 o « o « o w o « 0 0 o «o ,o +o «o o /jM Y1 0 1 O o j o d 1 0 O O O O O O O O o0 0 o f N M I I� MO mg/ I$ o a' I o y 0 d j e 0o I0 o a_r 0 o o. 1rz �o �o ob k0 O q MO F Na r 1 r� ✓ pf 11" k// 1 i O..... �� Yp $ CL _-- � �/� oC, Twp/// M 00 .�.®,. ®p..®r-4 0 NO %/ U) 1 0 0 o tl o Cio _-^ li'Wc, i rl r. 0 1 o l0 I O I® II 0 bi , //r / ` // J�����✓jr� I 10 M I 0 o 0 'o i 1 CD 000 CN! ® _ �i Oi�ri r/ -_- -- ko N 11 arl�/' I co 10 0 co O fj l' j ® .ME 10_ _ ®_.._i.- ---- r--- o LU rl�% 0 0 W/ o o o I c o 0 61F.�___w�._. _. Ee CD 0 rn 1 // d 1 i 10 d /ruriri o OJi� �l WLU > d m f f1pf ro a° O ; CV d c O v 3 N C O i D M d m r IL c O N C O u Om 7 Cl) M N O N N (D M O am rn N N N M 0 N a O LU w U C O O LU w m U ; r ; ; P X ; X P P Y W 7'i, co M OD In M N N --.r-...r--- r--- .. I r 4 4 I ica to O O N w� a ALO i q 4 1 (D X (O W (O (O co I p 1CD N e...a. ka iC� bio 4 1 1 1 1 1 I r 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 1 f 1 1 1 I C 1 4 m 4 1 O 1 1 1 `:3 I I ' 1 4 O U 1 1 N 1 I 1 C 1 C 1 I U 1 4 7 1 lT 1 1 V '6 I C I C 1 O4 E N 12 ca b c p C C to C !) E "6 '1 '> v m ;�v ;U, O ILLd (Q L IL o m � L a a co L. IL S d v O C C C1 C cc m > C9 t9 a 0 0 0 L) a a R V O L L. Q N ti O Rt LO L. O O .N O A C d d C O Z N N N <O V- O O m C d N C O Z 0 co w O O O A C m ;a N 0 Rt co r M 7 �M+ 0 LO N g1l "M .v b� yN p r A� « rte+0 'pi E �I y O w. O O w. O v O C;7. w O1 Cu �� It W O � (O N to 88 m N 00 00 O) d' N I M w 1 N S FI r/� 6 J If J YO qo o I o o I o E i I I 1 J/��V,/� o r o No 'o 1u o N A N �. N N lN I I I i I o +o «o ro o +o -o ro'o «o «o� o %'o 'o ro po yi//�/j��pf o 00 �jo Bio Io O r 0 « O r 0 + O r 0 r 0 + O r 0 r 0 a 0 « O r 0 O /��/ W N m 1 O) # O 1 O Imo/ [O '00 +OD 0 W ; W ;00 �1- 00 co r- 00 �W �O y W 1CO HIAA Ay O b(O ICD p(D v' [D K"? 4"4,tl � % � j �.�..N [+"a I AW �..�'N � N.m..� N-.�'._ ',, /� �WJ� rn '��.��• � 0 0 �._.. � ...�... 1 0 l �/ I I N 1� Y., a•- i� .__� __,..,..., � Y �' 1 1 I 1 1 % F(� '��, h I hy- I I` n 10 1 N O O 1 0 N O a 0 � O I Y Y I I I N I I 1 1 1 1 I r 1+1 •� � O 1' r W fi+Zl N N Y I 1 p Y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I I r�„iai/ o C=! 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 N 1 1 1 1 1 1 �ir�f O O �N O �O V.V.1 1 1 1 1 1 (y %. N 1 1 C 1 1 1 0 1� N 1 1 N 1 1 I V 1 u I 1 1 M 1 10 1 I 1 1 0 _.I 0 1 0 1 0 COQ. 1 1 O A 1 I I m 1 i 1 O In 1 0 II 1 1 0 # 1 1 0 (li I I 1 I N 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Y 1 1 1 1 I d 1 fA 1� 1 1 1•m I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I _ I 1 � 1 1 0 1 1 1� 1 W 1 0 1� I 1 1� 1 d M AJ i ; d p' co N ; N ; p i ucn i `O ; 171 X O lig 0 f2d� d� �..:. co"j l/i/o > a1ai (lI/1 Y6 I6 'O U C Y U (D O (D O / I U 1 U 1 N I 1 1� 1 1 >` I 1 1 Y y$ 71/71 wCIOr/r 1 I 1 I � G z ' y ' y N N ' U C Il��/� C ' C C C C «%��C « U r 4 G VF O O ' O ' O r O t W )rr%� o � - U U' U ' U ' U ftS '!,f o ca r r ii rn m caa m an m m rn ; t} Cu O O 47 C,3 012 TO 10IiLD .Ur ..Ur yam,CD nom, d M M N r O N N N (0 0 (0 CO O M r N (0 CL N N CV) 0 N 0 O 2 W W_ m U E O O O 2 W W_ m U C N E Q cr W c O U 7 co co C O U 40 to N C C w N c co N U N N n a� N U) Q U) N N D N 0 U C 7 O 0 U (0 Q w cu N Q .O N N CL OX W N (0 A a M M N U) r Cl N N N (U M O d' r N O lB N N M r O N 0 O 5 W W (0 U c � O N N N � O O C W Q U N M a M M N LO r O N a 0 co M O U) r N M CL N N M r Cl N 13 d O 2 W tr_ W 0 m U � O C N V O CA ` N = N O 'D = C o = U O W d m U N += M rL w T C] N 62 M M 0 f o + o N N �i r�/�/rro 0 li/ I r o e o " o to M 0 oIfS Ik S .. . S Io iSS 004 � i iAr, N 1 o 10 1� d to I� g a 00 r a 1�1 '%i 0 ID M M r� Iu 1 o Mo t-- 0 rr ea S tv a ea 1R r o X o u> 1 0 9 o I a a «l�� o tl o 1ID e rr �i r OfJl, o � o : o 0 CD M 0 (D N f0 Q. N N cM O N O 5 LLJ LLJ U C O cO C LLJ LLJ U S w'S o 0 1® ISo R 0 00 0 o M1 1 OO y o �O oo'n N..... ON 4'0.7 OS �0 oq 0 ea o Io 4 1 cs 1 dr Ire 0 1 +� o au 0s 0 to o 1 1 r IS 1 0 `o I a S 0 00 40O,. ® 000 0 00 0 ® O ID 0 1to 1 0 0 O O 0 M O O C 10 1 I N 1 f0 N fD 10 1 SNYf 4 aero' 0 10® 1 0 o0 0 Sj Irn rn 0 `0 0 1 0 10 l 0 yo 0 0 _ o 0:. oo o g.Mo 0 Mo 0 A' 0 0 M o o p I0 M 100 O ei 0M '',, O i lNO. fN0 III 1 N me 0 V e Y e Js = eJ O .� F 7 M M N U) O N a 0 M 4- 0 T N a7 c0 CL N N M T" O N O W W w U E O N O m W W N U co V— Q O N C .a m c.� M M O r��� o 0Cl to 0 In IocooM O Cp��ooc o H c3, C� CD dog � p/ o I wY% ti I ri o cu '�%%� �® I� , C7 I N I oo o i cw IN dN %� � co0 boOM Lo N 7 20 i 'TOO Mp NIl +1 0_»_1-___'r_.„ / r oo ` m 0 04 to N Om o t� C C O I��f O� i� O (DO� N w W v Q �i O v to �+ W _ /� L I' O N ch O U o iO M t N CJ' O N Ln a0O war fA � O 0 V 1. ;MA0 W ca �> Uci 7 M M N r O N N O (0 M O r N 0) m IL N N M T- w O T" N O 0 N d O W 0 0 W V O N U o c N O m 0 CD U N a of O o S U W r LV m O M U += C-4 � tO r 0 N 0) C R a ch 7 M M N LO r O N a 0 m IL N N M r O N O 5 W W (a U c O m O 2 W W m U cri C G. LO M 0 M M N O N O M L. O N am 0) M �2 O O M M o ;o ;a a 0 o to o O o o 0imo Io 1 00 M o No Ijo Io 0 �o io 0 O 0 0 o.._. 0 0 v 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 00 o Id 0 O 0 0 o 00 0 00 0 o o 0 r,o to O 0 0 0 O r - O 1O O M1 1n 1 N O lo 1:' V O O . (D to I II I d) U)H 0 0 0 o ti N N 00 C; � o My (D a eo 6 I V 0 O 0 0 o 00 0 00 0 o o 0 r,o to ro eo 0 0 0 o I.O I O M OM O O 1 0 0 o 0 I 10 0 c O 0 I® I- — O O o I � I� d O O A O M o M O O 10 N O I d) U)H to C',T c -, to 1oo 00 O I 0 I (D 6 I E' o w¢o O y0 O 1 0 I O M O O M O O O ti O O o I, O O O O O c -, O O MO (O a O O I U m ao I E' o w¢o O y0 floN X00 otD oOO I (D t0 - I,o 0 O O l o O 0 Y o ut u1 M NO (D to o I, O O O O O N O O b O O o O o0 00 O O I U m ao I E' C,Io �rn rn I k. o Io I,o 0 o No �c o O OM OM INO o Oo 00 Ip I M M 00 to '.co 00 o �o o I:.�o 00 N N I10 M M N r O N U) a M 0 M { N N O) of CL N (V M r Cl N .a O 2 W W U c O .y O 2 W W is U N r c O c O L) U) c O V R 5 CL M M N O N a ai ca 0 M O M N N O (6 a N N _M O N O r - w W fB U c 0 Q) 'a O 2 W W f0 U d r•1 d o 'o o 'o o 'o o .o ® �o I 1 o to ® to I 0 1 0 1 O I O ® 1 0 o ;o o 0 o 'o O 1 O p I 0 I 1 0 0 100 O 1 O 0 1 0 00 o .o ,o 0 1 O 1 OO 0l0 0 10 1 ;o 100 0 1 O ci 1 0 I 1 0 0 10 o to 0 10 10I O 1 0 1 O O 0 1 0 :0 0 O 1 00 O 1O 0 10 :0 0 O 1 0 O I o 0 1 0 1 10 1 O 0 10 1 0 10 o Io R to 0 10 0 10 0 1 0 o to 0 1 0 o ;o O 1 0 O 1 O O 1 0 ,m Ii 7 M M N O N LIDN N 0 CD M 15 14 d) CIO N N M r 0 N 0 C0 C w W IM U C O N O r> W W N U C E C E 0 CO C. N in ,,/ PI �� ° M M "« M " tl tl tl f/1 ,i/ a Xo ro A N N A A r tl tl �� ..� ..� ..� ..� ..� ..� . //i X r ) A 1 U fD N h O a� t` CD w lq lr/%� 00 cm d h O «� M ff ��m, O O 00 O ;COD. ; O o rri rrn tl6 «of No ,ai A M A tl N A r « A �➢ � A N 1 Y r N C,.7 r C"YWAC AOr c-) 0:0 O O« O r O N O .0 0 O N� / OO + O O 7 r O C'xY y CwC « C*rp % r moi" iffir F Cid W A [D a G•+ i' M 1 I l IiI�,,✓ 4 p M y O I O :0 I 10 N O , ' Iq 1O IO 1i ICV tlND M O O O O O Cl)"^5'1 O 1 0 I M I Cl) 1 1 0 r CID I O O R O/ I I M I 1 0 I N O �O N Q N O I O y 0 A! O O oloiolC; 6 c) o o y,.� [ .p..f..f..f..f..h•. rn Nm 0 "rn «o ''rn w r w i i� f a « a. c; c ; c c µ 6 r c « 6 0"01nxlplo'o'r 0 Uiu% a n 1 N 1. 1 1 11 0� 1 0�' I 1 0"<i" 11 pp I VE o " V I V 1C6 I I w°O M A0 l �'/� � 'r fl a 1 1 r 1 1 A 1 1 1 1 0 uo l0 10 Io E,2 �I N tl fD 1 fD 1 lD 1 CD 1 f� NCD HMIN � • �y 1( YI, X 1 1 1 1 • i�/ % C HIM' 0 ami:wJ 0: «(nil : ~ '0 (� f •� :m :� : �•� C lri�� �:aa Ear �a;G�G ���:m a. c�. .>'.2 a:f� °>">:� t. = . L CL ~ �aD Cl) /f� 1 , , o SO- — - — . - 0 O 0 0 O 0 ti CND 0 0 0 II :. A d C W W N d O M L1i M M N U) r O N a m IW CD M 0 Ln N N rn m CL N N _M O N LL W m U c 0 0 r - LU L1J m U ^o +o a; o 0 i I ®® l o o N o ' u� ,vs 40 10 I '0 r` r` o r,O o 10"o 1 ,o tM i, M O ' 1 co 00 OR o ;o O 1 o ti I� to ;o 1 CO I IS CR cq c 10 ® 10 o �o h , ti I,ti r _1...__.-._L ---- : 0 0 o r o 0 to to I m O j o o p o o ro yo ,o � r o ¢ ® ® 1 0 o I'® Ilio io 10 r I I ' i I ' 1 i I 0 o ®-_-Fo 1 o o 0 1 0 CO o O 10 ® O O 1 G 1 C5 0 o d o ® 1 O �® �o 10 ® ID I I ' { I ' I I ' 0 i ' I { yay O 1 0 q y 0 1 0 I b O 1 O gC, jo I l0 1.o � 10 10 to 'o 1 jo i 10 o 'o 0 10 No 1p 1 rC) I ;o �0 10 0 10 ;a_ • r a + LL,a W C N L ro c Z z z M o r 0 :. :. :. :. :. :. 10 0 .0 '0 , 0 to .0 �O C, 0 C, 0 0 0 0 0 O , oCt q C! 0 o do C, ---- 1- ---- 1, ---- t --- llp ---- [ ---- t, ----- 0 to 1 t t 0 to 0 00 0 1 0 C, C� 0. 10 lc-; CD to 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 I 10 0 o I o 0 0 I 0 0 0 I io 0 I io 0 I 10 C) 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 1 0 10 10 CD 0 10 11 0 0 --- ---- ---- ---- ---- q t 0 i 0 0 C, 0 0 0 0 10 0 C, C) C� 10 0 C; 0 1,00c q 10 0 to 110 C, 0 0 C> 0 0 10 0 10 10 0 10 0 10 c0i 100 cl c:t 1(0, C� 0 q 0 o l- 0 CS C, C; I Cc, 16 R 10 0 :- R 0 - - - - .1 . . . . 0 R 0 tlo 0 q to wo .0 wo to o 10 o q to 10 -------- ---- — 0 0 0 0 Cl C, 110 CD C, 0 o to , C� 0 0 'Miff CR q q R Ct 0 0 0 0 0 10 1 o, 8 C, 0 M o 0 1 0 C, C, C, 10 0 C, 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 q q q lq q 1.0 C. 0 0 0 CD 100 1 Cc, 1(0, R U) 0 0 0 0 CS tC; " C I 'A W 1 3",3411, (IIlfllll IRS, g ilsoll 4) E o> m :E E LL > Wr Os C*4 0 OR 0 t 1 C� 0 No 0 10 0 0 0 10 11 0 0 too 10 10 0 C5. 0 C, q t R :R : q R :q 0 to 10 :0 10 :0 CD 11- ---- :00 00 C, 0 C, C; 0 CS C, Cc, t C; I Cc, 16 R 10 0 :- R 0 - C, q t 0 10 0 I C, to to to olO k5 1'11 10 o la to Ira Ors to p0 0 O (D 1o 1 Co. 10. C, Ic 0 o �DR t 0 0 0 o R t I C; -------- ---- — 0 0 0 0 Cl C, 110 CD C, 0 o to , C� 0 0 'Miff CR q q R Ct 0 0 0 0 0 10 1 o, 8 C, 0 M o 0 1 0 C, C, C, 10 0 C, 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 q q q lq q 1.0 C. 0 0 0 CD 100 1 Cc, 1(0, R U) 0 0 0 0 CS tC; " C I 'A W 1 3",3411, (IIlfllll IRS, g ilsoll 4) E o> m :E E LL > Wr Os C*4 0 OR C4 :u Lc; M 0 :C) :0 :0 "o :0 :0 0 10 so 0 1 10 q IR 10 R q 0 -------------- 0 0 L L-... 0 :0 0 :0 o :0 : oo :0 :0 'o :0 0 0 C� 0 0 0 0 q 0 «o o C I 0 10 C) 0 0 0 in 0 1 0 0 lo 0 lo 0 in 0 in 0 0 C� !o C� Iq In q q R 0in lo in 10 to so 0 0 0 Inq 0 ` 0 10 0 1 0 0 10 10 to C! I 0 0 t,0 0 10 i I0 ---- r - --- _ Ir r 0 10 in In lo �o in 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 1'0 R R R C! C! C, Io Is o o No to tlo 7- �o- o- - 0 C, 0 so 0 " 10 0 to 10 10 1 0 C3 $0 $0 0 0 so 0 0 10 so 0 1 10 q IR 10 R q iR -------------- 0 0 L L-... 0 :0 0 :0 o :0 : oo :0 :0 'o :0 0 0 C� 0 0 0 0 q 0 «o 0 0 NO No 1 0 so 0 : 0 0 'so n : . 0 : 0 0 C� � 0 so 0 10 I O 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 : -4- 4s ----l 4 1 ---- o C I 0 0 q C� R C! so 11 R q 0 0 0 1'.0 0 0 10 : a i I I I -, I a1 No 0 C, 0 o No N NO 0 q u 1 R $0 @o NO 10 11 0 0 0 0 C, 10 i C, C3 q R q q C> 0 0 0 -4 r r---- 0 n 0 0 0 No n 0 o0 0 0 C, 0 0 0 I Is lc=! C! C! 10 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 10 No 10 NO 1, C', PO 0 M0 ' 10 R 10 10 R No R 0 0 10 0 1 In 0 0 0 - ' 0 000 R q 1 0 q R 0 0 0 110 !t=oo 110 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 �o 1 0 0 1 1 1 C� 10 R q I C! N,0 I " 10 o 10 0 to 10 0 0 0 10 C, 10 to 10 0 In 0 0 10 1 q q i C! so 10 R I R C! q 10 , 0 1 0 10 1 0 10 0 0 0 :0 N O :0 :0 :0 a, E 'rvd—S > : S W f LL 0 2 E (D a) A a)'O A E 0 U) C9 0 0 0 ca < R 0 0 C) 0 C! C. 0 C, M O O 0 0 CD 0 n 0 C, M q CD 0 n M 3 12 CL M M N O N a 0 N N M O N a O 2 w w m U c O N O 2 w w m U �� ji •�SIJ �' o o I o c" � 1 0 �� 0 Co +' 0o Wo io �r I $ M $0 tlP IiI 0 X 0 IP �MP 1�l%;oo oom o oD N iwg - o qo k to wo w H�; Off 4 ff � � 'CO ` Vii% �'r%i, a^r w0 m0 i0 i0 i0 f �� 1/r /< M a N / pail ,j w e e L.._ -L ---- L ---- L. -L----L--_. m/jJ - g, _>� 10W IIl4 MY r 'Oa C 7 " p N LL N r r N N 3 d O F a M M N r O N a M 0 M L- O 0) N N m d N N _M Cl N a O W W m U c .N N O W W cu U o o jo ootot0 0o y00 1C 1 pO 10 C, O0O1 0d 0 NO ip0 O I •` 1 o 10 80 10 �0 to E w ++ 0 10 10 o Mo �o coi0o o 0 Mo 10 �0 10 10 Mo afO y0 0 0 1 0 O M M o 10 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 1 0 l 0 10 �� 0 o o po 0 0 co n z 441" 1 00 Y A o o Y R , U ��o Mo ,�� 0 I o „ E0 C r+ Aga m LL a i9 a lb f d' �v d�= r a, a,0 n W h i t ca �c «�m o«�_ O .� O _ _ �_ CO �� Q ` O a 0 (7 Q M m tD Ln lr ,cl ; r, -- CL N N M Cl N 'D O 15 W W m U E O \Q� CO C W W (6 U ;I- 1 1 O 1 O 1 O 0 1 0 0�u o® loo (0 00 1!000 04 O 10 U�C14 IN 1 1cli W Im N IN O 'O O O o .o o ,o 0 d� I O 0 I O C') NO Ci N �O NO IN0 tri U) .. u oll a n 1 NO INO to 1 In 01) N0 INo ri 1U) I I U, O t O 6Xk N 4Yl I� o- m 100 w W Or o ao m r W � W' r O WO O 4 O W U "U) i 0 NyO 0 co .L t� 3 cm � M M N O N cc 0 M 0 M N D) (a CL N N M O N O 2 LU W (a U 0 0 2 w LU_ U 3 O U CO) a cc � O " 0 1 0 r. h- 11, O 0 p 0 0 DI 0 0 0 r O r 0 r 0 r (D IR Cj t 0 rCj r r 9 0 I. 0 o io &o p to I IO o o o d 0 rld 1 0 �® o o O r O O ouo O 1 O i'0 1 O i 1` O Cl) d 0 C i O O 0 (p 0 b r'O r 0 O tl! O o 1 M oqo 0 1 ioO MM o n ro 0 1 10R I (NO Do N N (ND co O O 0 r Ocli 9 0 I. 0 1 O (D I 0 O. O O Yyo �:. O I U6 IOD ,...'C. p�p ,.... �. ., r" 101 L .. _ .... 0 (' 0 O r O O O O OO O 00 O O O 0 0 r, 0q O O 0 r'O r 0 O M & 1 O O Y to to Y o I,o I O C, I O M 8 I'. NO I M ® NO Hl O ® t® I O I to N O oO O o tl! O o 1 M D f OO -00 0O O O ioO MM p� 1 U) YJ O�o I 0 a0 q,0 1,00 I (6 oM "D0 00 O 0 O MC, M0 0 1� 0 tl, I!i N C5 0 �o 00 I,0 y d " 0 10 I o 1' N K Cl) O 0 N 0 M O O - . . O N I N A . .. N $ o O O 1n I Co 0 iCD p o o 1 1 0 "� "o I o Iti to ® 1® Na I �c UO 2X L) r p CL 2 Q IL M M N LO r O N N N m 0 tD M O N M N O) M CL N N M Cl N .D O r W W f0 C O N O W W U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O F 2 CL M M N US,) T- O N U) N N (6 (D M O M M N f0 IL N N M O N 0 w W m U C 0 `W 0 2 W w m U 0 0 o o O o 0 0 C! o o ao «o 0 0 0 ��i o ao o �o to 0 0 0 iff , O O O O I O O 6 O�o �0 0 �o �0 0 1 ......�...� 0 0 0 0 �l o qo qo jo jo jo 10 0 ( b R No 0 �0 - _ -,_,I ---------�o �o to � 0_,_,»�o c_.. , 0 0 G1 i i o �0 0 $hw �Y� � "��� O 1 0 I O 1 0 1 0 M O 1 O •� W w` E 1 1 I 1 M N 1 ) al• V a C n LL N 04 _�= d .� .gym I. 'Y..oco �� r tv d 7 m a) a G 00 n M M N U) O N N N cu (0 0 tD M lb M N O fa IL N N c*i O N a O W W_ m U c O .y N cO C W W U W M M N LO Cl N LO N O ca (0 Q (D M r� O LO M N (0 CL N N M O N a O 7 - LU W m C O N O 2 W w N U O .O .o ,o .O .O ,O :0 w 0 :0 :0 :n 4 J O O 1 O 1 O ' O 1 O l� O '� O 1 O O f 0 O O 1 � � O 1 b O 1 0 O 1 0 O �M� 1 O tl� 10 1� 10 10 1� i1J J fJ R IO i0o {b ;o o cs o 0 0 0 0 0 CD 10-_10 l 1/ O O I o p 1 0 0 0 o 8o io o o Io to X0 0 iC, P 1� �a1�1/16 ";4 n, 0 :0 :0 :0 "o "o y,...,.L----L----L.: r.' -L— ---L_ .. y9 Lmr �m v en ray „a cm . C N 7 s a C' 5 CL M M N r O N LO N O co +. 0 (D M -0 A (O M N (0 4. N N M O N O 2 W W_ U C O O 2 W W m U l i%1 0 o o ® o 0 0 a �o "o a� GC, 0 00 0 io , o , r� o 0 0 g//" r .. /,J� O O O Iq O r r o a� c ca I� o -_�-..,...�...,.� w,._�.�-�-r----i---- /��% o Mg �o fo 1�0 0 ����/j% o to do Mo fo o 0 oo �0 0 �l/��/1 mo�o �NO o oo i�o� o ffoo mo =c o f�f�� m t s m m i M 0 1 ✓�/ j ��%� ii 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o c 0 o� CD 0 rU >+ ----L--- L -....r r.----L----L--- �"���ri rG%i/ = �+ /lr� 1 "M °' i /I Dr�i/ g t " as C C N j my c ° ° ; ti 'H g C. 0 �o r, - C,6 , " 7 O M N LO 0 N O M N Cu 0 N O r a) rn IM Wl N N Cl) O N O W W (d U C O m O r - W W U ' N 9 y1ry; &iN� jt n N r r � W / W r n1 0 .0 .0 .o po "'l, ' � " b CD ra/ 1 1 r ____ /� I 1 10 I N l i` yg Cl) N �W. r 1 IA 11- 1 (D I C4 00 N Al4CD CD r 1 I 1 y /l�ff�' Po 1 1v j/ /� tl 1 1 W Q C oil 1 1 1 Lt i ! pli y i N 1 N C 0 b b o d d �� c aIt�b O Z. C> ;o ;o Wo p d 1 1 p 1 1 �i 11 4 1 1 1 1%A1fl N C) .i ; N O N 1a7�/ O . I` O r N y O . It r CY) Ih- r, OD E r N w N r / L w f% CD C_ a IN N U �, %J c IO c 7 .. 171 OR U r U U N r O U) co O d r0 m" c . O cti t1 . m o a) L Q. CL o «. N E H N a E — Oa //i O M N LO r O N O M N N O N N C) m CL N N M O N O 5 W W N U c CA O m O 5 W W_ N U M M 70 U C'— �U a) Q U) U 0 .O Q C O N N m D Q O E O a) O E a) c O E _0 C c O U 3 U) C O U T 0 fA U U U N 0 - CA CA U A) 0 - CL Q C O U a) N cu rn a) Q H Q a) U L 0 > 6 cu U 4_- U a) Q CA U a) 0 - OL Q c 0 a> CA co m a) co 'O '0 V/ y., p "p O Y n0 V T w0 "o ,L v "M 'N M "U 'In A ' 0 U) 'N N wU) p N (R 0'0 10 X w0 LQ ;N CO (11: O O „. O r y M t co y V , N r A Ln a a N w U) N M r X tl tl Y I I I f 1 f I I 1 @ N ry@ry M I A I l I I I N p R 1 4 I I I f 1 I Y I 1 N Ipbkbp O NIO 10 I� I� I� @M pU) � @M I� p0 I V lo? to tl N q N 1 1 I I U) I cD Y N 1- I M YCq @ V' [h loco ICS $4 N Im U) N Ia? U) @ I @ @ @ I C 3 I k I O ' O ro m,o N Y Yw Lu V r n V r a) F C X C X r C r C C F C , N N X X L r 7 d A X X V7 r Z0) r 2) C XCoA CT r C p X CD X d A .] r I X D X J F O X p LL X a 4 ;p LLLL LL ,,W LLJW wr r a w N a. ca r f6 o r o . f6 F o l6 X o - L o" o " d "' a) " a) `' a) m m U 'V V 'V c sj '7 "5 .5 "5 `...Z) r t 2 X 0 r m 13,n n n m O X J 7u X 1,6r c> O F , , : a (D C a) C a) C ;'� — da) C C C a. a) C aD C tl w r yW,W y yW n , ;W ,W �. ;W y, nW y ;W Lo ;a ba ,- Aa .a ra A- ,- n C) M N LO r O N O M r N N CO O N 0 0 2 w W cu U C O .N 0 a W W m U « y r aN w x w « 1 9 1 r i i tl w 4 w x A fl 6 n r r r « O r to a � r x O r O '" a 0 « a a N a 1- r 0 r 0 co w (q . to « w u w V O In w N ae0 r 0 r q n N r 0 «� «� «� «o r� �:.0 ;N eo «M xI «N «� w�m „O ;O «O «p ryM '.W ro a0 rN a� r U r N Cl)a w� a0 r «M a, CO «00 LO Cl) r nN r « « r I tl I I I I N I I q I a I I 6 ! q q k U t N 4 & I ! I tl Y N N N I N N I N %I I N U I N N YI U p Y tl N I I I 1 I I 0 rU�- r M ILf) I p I M L p I d; I Y I N N I C I O 1 1 0 N 1- l ao 0 0 q N N O N ! M N t4 O kp O 0 I O N O Y O N 1- I O ql C, I N O I o I 0 O I O N I P- I I N NO !� I� Nry IN I� to I U ! N� U q� 1 V roa a 1 N I I N N� !� Ito NL to No 0 10 q0 No q� q0 NN M', o 0 N Itp I� qN U.= Icp No qN No !� Iw I Itp N N tNt N d Nom' NN !N !� I'N N 1 q'O 41 III IIIS 10 I I I 1 I I N M I N N I ! # t I N @ ! N U t N N U U F N W N I N ...f..,. .,„. .,.. .«4..., ... .,« ..4� .,. . ... ...,.,,. «,. ..,�.., « ..4-4.., ..4..4 ... �. .�.,..�...,�..,.�.. co co wryr co i Q � C �C ««rr« C xaxww LpJCC xr«rr L0JC 0 O 0 l 7 ID p ID al N ` 'p 'OCCC '2 0 (D (J (9 N N NN p rrr rr N JLC � IY � W . Q♦-' Lx 1. Z Z r - ♦- e♦- ♦�•-- r m .er 1 Y N rN Nr ch (D (�N � (.D U) U)nf- nnrnnwn � .D .� r N -N NN .tpo . p p r ty6 «m -p wD -p «D «a «V r w r75 r, p -6 r, tl W m U) r U) r (n a (n M ...f...r...t...t...f...h...rrr..t,...f.rr.t...r...r...f...f...f...h...t...r...�.,..r...f.,..f«..f...r...r...f...f.. r r r r r w a w m r a r w a x r r r X r w r o y, r y« r N N N N y r « °' a :: «g "g a Q m o «n «Q a «n + a «n fp/i ° a fp// r ” N N fU N N _d r� ,� .D �to rF�- rn 2 2rEP m aC 'oC 'aC 'oc r:'ac � «D«� Q r C a, C C C C r C J co J J J p r p M p p p p d 0- d tl. W ,W w xW e ,W r ,w «W r ,� r ,� s a wa r „$ m « ,[n ,fn wtA r. «(4 r atq r r r r. (U r. N r d w fo N e N N r a) oz am rZ rB rm « M A w� a w r r N N M O N O 2 W W_ m U c 0 U) O W W cls U I 0 W 1.m a h I CD b ; I M N � (A o LO Cf"l r O ab O N r� r� O , 00 CwA C"5 r' ° Y "N nN w� 1]) M tl Y + 'N r00 tl0 'O n0 � w '0 M CO .0 a� aM O '� X 0 r O °� ; O r 0 O tT «tn r rN O r U « r 00 a M XO r Ui r Uf r U n LQ a 0d. r u r: CO nh r ;co MM ;M ;oD ;0 ;� S ;a ;0 ,� :N �N ,.N ;N a ? « w e.N w I rd�'reN M pp I ,U) N I L I I 1 I ILO OI o I d: gy N N N N N I N I 1 U I I N I N p M N N M O N O 2 W W_ m U c 0 U) O W W cls U I 0 W 1.m O h I k tl b ; I 1 � (A o Cf"l w ll"l ab O ab r1 r� r� °- , 00 CwA C"5 o Y ° Y "N nN w� °C M tl Y + 'N r00 tl0 'O n0 soh N N O r0 '0 M CO .0 a� aM O '� X 0 r O °� ; O r 0 O n 0, W CO nh bcr �N ; V a ? wdr0' e.N w I rd�'reN M pp I ,U) IN I W 1.m I . I I I I 1 � (A o Cf"l M Cw7 C"',1 I W t 9 4C? 1 ao I &"x M 1Cl CwA C"5 o Y ° Y a) C5 tl a) M tl Y + a * Y I I N 0 N N 1 g N cO P I I I a ? I N M pp I N N I L I I 1 I ILO OI o I d: gy N N N N N I I I L k IM N Np_ tlat Nub kti N Ici {tet Ico o r Pcq X a ;a tla M , qq-C'4 I IN N IN m IXn N ILD Nti IM Y� ti �' I� ICO CD M 0 �� co 00t' r I I� N k' I I V N d N N Y N N N p. I N N 999999 II I I III III III I I I 1 I'.. Y I I I' iI tlItl I N I pI. ..f....,.....�..4,.....4...�...�...�. .�. .�. .�. .}. .�...p«..�...�...�,. + C « C « C « C m a y U , O , O , U a U , U x U « U + � X ,a ,a ,a ma asN y rn N N tl r C . O „ C a 0 ti C r 0 w C n 0 b C a 0 + LM7 X N a N a N X a) „ ° o �X o N , o o N „ o «M c N " V " a' . Cj aY U U U U U t4 J r J f9 J J J �. y N n y N r + , a) . a) « ; N r n U j x. j j r. j X j X « '+ X + M� 0 oN o '. oN oN W+ mC ca w av a LL s oo e a Om oN o o tl� M a° 'SE aC C'0U U U o o, o o o a� m mm ; ro ; + l4 CO f6 ; tl « ; ; ; `D a`) ;`) (D a`) ya`) ;0 wa) Cl) `D;0 „ 6 n>1� ,75 a 5y ;y -t6 ayZ6 "1� ,>15 aye ; „16> , 6 ,1�> >6 a) «W Q aa) (D a ,: wa ,m na na „a as «a Xa ma "a +a a ba ,a wa ,a ; ; IN I W 1.m I . I I I I 1 � (A o Cf"l M Cw7 C"',1 I W t 9 4C? 1 ao I &"x M 1Cl CwA C"5 o Y ° Y a) C5 tl a) M tl Y + a * 40 0 ,0 no no yo o g + 0, cO !N !O a ? .r ...r ,...r ...p .... ..., .p ...,r ...p .... 0 -0 b 0 b 0 � � N y i N tl N X V , U n U r V M r , ; N ° N Y o Y ° Y a) c U tl a) M tl Y + a * 40 0 ,0 no no yo o g + 0, a ; a n o a a a Nm 0 ° N b N D w U) w U) r U) (n 0 a0 «0 a0 w m ca m cu tl X a ;a tla M , a «a nM r, « na wa r 7 C) Cl) N LO T- C) N O M (0 0 d) U N Y C f6 U N U) N N M O N W O c E O ++ v E O `m N N N > O f) V W W > ++ cu O U Q c N N 7 C7 M N U') 0 N O M r Q 15 0 N (0 N rn ca d N N M_ O N cO G LU W M U C O N cO G W W ca U N -1 a poe N „.N ��� YY.a 00 a. LO M Y ao m N " m " n N O Io to too wo N # cm C'4 Dv Nam I.O P� -4 I; Nn O ' --- - Mw op o �N o in N I 1 0 N G o N N I` p o 1oM Nf00p01 m IN AI fo rym Cl) I`n a N1 m LO M N C M N N '� N iI Y w o N.Co io o i o O w ti IN �N ~ 4o N0 10p tlo �.� N �M M... M m. N -...®...,._0.M r N uni "® o "o " 4,°co O m e O r nO W O b o # O I M Y I N ". M M tq w I I i on rON 11f) w0 10 p pfo0 I LQ q0 NO O tl fD I'. O w D 10 N I w tl r` N o lrr $ M t o I.. r o h N O 0 O C; N O o.. -r ... ....,.. N I` p o 1oM Nf00p01 m IN AI 7,0 uo lo Itoo T NN I. 1000 '� N iI lo o �o o N.Co io o i o O O 1N 10 IO 10 O I O O M ICR A to rcwz o I o CA 0 1 tl O � r` ro N 0 &0 10 1N 1 b O 1 N O� LO N N1- i� LO_ �' O M o v Y a 0o woo o rno us 1 o O IlC6 II y N a T i w r Y W W O c O/ %!% N «N «CJ M M « O V W M N% O o Y o N o o O r M O %U LOI�/// I o Gti o I f MIN /p f ///�IS i ti to to �o r- Grr/%/%/ M Ni Ell, °i j� U//� %i, M I '� N i m pl coir °D m �, IMO �O 1r IM IN {{ N - ��/�J // l/ cli f fl 1/ // O / / %I N I O I O 1[1 coo I«n �o Io Un O I O I O I O O y lafi/ jl/r ��U ill,I 1,%/%J 1 %�/� �� /(i/ii/ ti IoM �� Ioo foo n Io 0 N /� Cl I I N I I N m l piij �/ /lr I I N I. 1. N Io to Io m o I I I 9 rN- Io �m Io Io N fl%// �%/i o Icon 9 0 t o o 0 4 i (f oo Imo NC, ry m 0 N / j - -IT qo N c N �i % - -- �.. _. Cl) .�.... O im, Ni (O w04 aocli LU I g � N ° I o iQU 1 c6 o _ 0 NMI,, a IJ(11J?1mill c.:: .. r;%LU O LUR �/f f ;3�%%//iji Q c a o 91 J'i / w U N += U ! r gg /� l� Y. O El 7 0 M N LO O N O M r N N T" N 45 00 N f0 a N N M O N O 2 w w N U c 0 a� O 2 w w co U 0 0 O a 4- 0 U) El v d L V a_ O 01 M M u 0 0 0 H O co a� E 0 U A i� m 0 U a N M or—!" fil Cli N c1r) C) T" CN 0 0 W LU 0 0 2 LU w d" i 0 C, oo 0 0 C, o i0 No I0 0 0 0 0 Io C, 0 0 i0 i0 10 0 0 0 C-1 0 R R 0 CS 0 0 0 o --- 0 : 0 : 0 1 0 o , 00 0 o .o C! C! o 'o 0 to 0 0 0 F0 . q 0 10 0 0 la CID 0 q q 0 00 m 0 Q Ow so COP CC6, 0 .0 o 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 -! 0 C, 00 0., 00 00 11 ci 0 C� or o q L f C)0 No o --- 0 : 0 : 0 1 0 o , 00 0 o .o C! C! o 'o 0 a No Vo 00 C, 0 0 0 0 0 0 .... �-..4--,.I,_ o ..4----I- 0C, 0 0 0 to 0 0 0 F0 . q o 1 .C! q I 0 0 0 0 0 olio o 0 0 o 0 M C! 1 q q R 0 .0 o C M 0 00 di 0Cl o C, o q o o C)0 No 0 No M l00 o q 0 O 0 i 0 o a No Vo 00 C, 0 0 0 0 0 0 .... �-..4--,.I,_ o ..4----I- 0C, 0 0 0 to 0 0 0 F0 . q o 1 .C! q I 0 0 0 0 0 C, 00 o 0 0 o 0 c 0 o N C! 1 q q R 0 .0 Al."I".. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 ct o i o i Q C! 0 q 0 R 0 C, Al."I".. 0 0 00 00 0Cl o C, o q C> q 0 R C; 0 10 0 0 -.4 - --- i R ® 0 Lc> 00 00 ic; ON Q CC I' 0 IC 1) M 0 lo 10 10 0 0 C, R R R q C, 0 i0 0 0J) C6 0 0 C3 oo 0 C:, R 0 00 m C, Al."I".. .. C, A 4,5) yro a) > O M N LO r O N O M r m (0 0 N N M r O N O 2 W w m U C O N O 2 W W N U a) d U O M O M cDO M M N 1 N 1 0 10 o to o to ce)1 1 OD 1 OD I r C; to 1 ti Iti tirn r--a) O IN M1 Cl) N 1N ti Iti N O L W M1 Cl) N I N ._._L._. O c O Oc O O c O O c O O c O i 1 N #N N 1N 1 N O 10 O N d0 OIb O O # O # CN N dN It M It d, I' O tl O OV (A 1 01 O 1 IT cli 1 m1 � L IN O1 O C 1 O 1 0 1 0 OD I co 00 I O I 00 1 N 1 N O 1 0 O 1 C to 11` OD 1 OD N 1 N 1 OD I f0 1 ILn N 1 N O 1 O 7 i 7 1 1 (DD 1 co N I ID e 1� I ...:E'�.... .v � c� 7 C) M N LO 0 N O M r r N O N 0) m CL N N CM C) N a 0 2 W W U C 0 .0 O 2 W w m U C O E O C E m N Q. N li co 4 .0 , co r M "o a 0 N a M r x fl n w m 7 M O G O a r In x M Ch M � d p N r, 1C) CA :(o :co n a d Y W O yo O O :0 q w (0 O -o wt 'N ' 00N d d(A � Y (O Y d 10 d 4..44--F.. I I 1 1 I 1 O j0 j0 jCOO ,N M IM ICA ICA 'O 07 IM 110 IN dV I 1 1 1 1 I ..hwwh..h..h.. (O (O co CO 00 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 O 10 10 10 d0 v, Iv, Iv .a drn W 1W 100 10 'LO 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 10 10 10 d0 W 1(0 1(D 10 dfl. m o :(O :(O 1 1 1 :c� �S',c (� . lTl . lA . •� w A �,�•�.m = CU w T :0 :cc - d:C:-:.1L E:�:�:BCD w� ' O C .0 0 0 0 0 O O O O M O O O ti M O O O 1B.w N N O O O ti 0 O W� O O aw N (O O O O N M CO 00 coO O v" Cl) 0 t` N_ O 00" r` co 0 � N a 00 U) 0 4� r- 04 �k .fur uf1 O � OG N rn D 2) N C W U O C Cl M N LO O N O M r N N N M C) N 0 O LU W (6 U C O Y) N i CO G W W m U N "----1.` - _ _ -1"----� d),( j� Nay O M I; O M I O M N O M � O � O a 0 i I 0 N I N YI y r M �c2 �O M o �A(�,pM p l0 1`nrv"no o I p N w In N I N G o p w N I N ( p N p N I n g o I o Mco 1 7 co N N N O I0 N 1. N I W rA I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 O o r o r o r o O r 0 r 0 r 0 IP x m x x. O 1 0 I o M p o M I o I, o p o I NIp o poo O ( 0 p O O 1 O 9Z �Oy-N, p� cOo Op k o m N N p I p O N O O N1 D O I I M M O I O I (00 Yo I O 0 O I O N N N I I I I I {� 1 00 0 100 O 1s O 1 1 p N I I m ...... .. �„ .... ... O..... I 1 1 N O 1 O O I O 1 -- ---- ---- a') d) o o I I p O I p O C o o I m o f0 I � Im r UOR mU '0I 01 y y �' w� Iw= ;mom ;mom z zD (n w 0 fa Z a) N D C J .Q j C w E N C Lo D N tlp tl W , O p Q O C9"1`0 tl rn � "DO � M r ov lov N0a NDv l0 d' 00 0 0 o N o o l o o l o o M M I M 1 0 I O N V 1 I N I N ----I --- - f_ --- p N I 0 0 l 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 I o 0 V O INo IMO '�N O I�o N I V II N I N r - --- I'oM k � O Io l4iir I I I I r --- N I N 0 M l 0 v O O O p 010 O � O r �ti M O 0 d) O M O p ''N o N 0 0 0 d O M O O N O u) N oM 00 �o N W --- F __F O N 0"t O p O O O O N O W d O O O O o0 O O M ti c p O C; N O M O H O p O O 0 0 � o , , m v I 1( ° "'o V 1 V 1 1 o =- wN M rC\l a --_ _L _ - _-L----L _--_L --- O1 . m : N U_ , _T , w U m ,m , E'9 pc m.5 v `cO "� v .u. 0 � ]� , N 0 , 0 N 0�E , N , N , C , 0 CDU 2w I°- ri1 O M N In 0 N 0 M r V- 04 N O M N IL N N M 0 N .O O 2 W W U E O .N O m W W N U Lc; 2 o 'm +m r+N eco yN qr oo j a� y, ccc, j j as d 0 SMO �oo i'(s #c ao Ci 4a Nr �1n®- tYcv oV. p0 i....o� NOO No7 O® I0g N 0050 Yw�*�. 10,0 om NO N Nm„_ Ili _...._, NN..._ LC) co N N 1 I co1- N6 Lnq po lr rNr d'o 0o r [C4_ Nf® Log ti 1pu? I0) 1® Eh�^. o a N t o I N 1® 00 6 O or ' O O ' O x 0 O O 10 O O O O x 0 w. O x O x 0 w. O �. ,. O x 0 1 0 W O O O p 0 O,y N 0 Cc' N 00 C,"0 l O o l OO OM b0 01 O O it0 � i ID ui m I N I I 0 No NO �omoa om o o N o I o o ci I w o l o 0 N 0 goo oo N,.�o N.�o Loo'n® 11 h- N 00 lov Ioxn lo'a 00 LO Dot 00 lo® loo loo loo 00 o Nm No 1 O to Lq t` I r � •d' N � I OC, OD Om Nom lCOl m ,A � o +o NCl)o I�+o I yso o 0) NO r Isco rpm Im N'm , ® O N OD p 10 0 N N Yr. � O NN M p I o ® �.....o Nm Iw d. ®o loo'oo �oc lmo 00 No 1 )o too Ilio loo Na Iti IN Ir co w 1C N M 1 a 1 M , 0 , O N x V r x In x N L Ux T x xEm . D Em rov Ali '0 x� >NN x 7 �. p'j w N p ' O V 1.. O ' C , °6 m ' rn2 ' E o xm o xc xo 0" CL 0 M N r O N CO M r N N 0 r N O r N 0) m W F'%o :� :� :� '� ill /� IN 10 o N I o a P o 0 'o Imo Ih Nro Ivo o ro 1 a I of Cl)Cl)N M /1 / i OOM I pI pI0M gl [7 pNo Ido LU_4'---- LU IR Im Iia M16 I WI U1 C) M 1 00 'y 0A 1 y 1 oDO�f/ MISS � //04 •� J i/ l//�// N O o 00 1 (D N N i CO N 04 /� '- --L----L----L----L--- O(�/ a Iifl%/ G 1W�V �/�/ W% G1/� dr �E� "' �.c cmc W %/r r//% S c E m ry a u- 0 W E i,'iiE;> m o N m h O A a) N a O C1 O O 10 N N Mf O 0 Ch N N N I IL 0 M N In r O N O M M 0 N N M_ O N 0 0 a w w_ m U O c0 C w w m U r ori 2 ro o m 'm '1 - co I ro�O �tN° �m OC, �'.Og OC, yOp Op N° �.(DO uti0 �, �.° [7 �' 00 h M ----------------. Oo op 11oo 1 5. o0 O O I, -: o N O I O m N Y r - ---- ----------- R� �'� N'co Ce)drn !OD �cm; 10 a pC') v ,� ,v w Doo coI1 N NM r , , O ,M ,N�- N ' m N l0 C C C U ' T U �yv �'�elEm'Ec coE' v ALL L m E U ' c �m 'rn2 c ti ti v N d O M O O CIO N H M O 0 o, U, M N 0 N. - C) 0 M N U) T" C) N O M r IW N 0 co m rn co CL N N CM O N O r> w w m U E 0 a� v 0 w w (6 U ;� N N h 1ll LO N 0oi00 No �No 00 ;00 0 0 10 0 1 N 1 N M ' M 1 N 1 co N 1Lf) 1 o 'oo N IN ti 11,. t7 I M ----L-- �0 o .o OR ORI hN+ I ti ® 'o 0 l 0 1 1 1 ® I O O 1 0 1 .. 1 1 1 1 I I O 1 0 O 1 0 1 I04 ~ 1 � O I O 0 1 0 1 1 I I 00X00. 0 0 ' 0 C, 1 Cl) 1 1 M 0 1 m N I N o Io U) i0<� NN 'Iq ria I m 1m C14 �OD 01 0 Ln IN O 1 O icy rn ;a 7A 0—� rel O C14 LO O O ca 0 FAI 0 0 OD (D 0 0 (D �T 0 0 cli m N O C! N rl: O Lf) 'o U) ---- ---- ---- 0 0 1 (b I U) 00 I''00 0!0 0 0 0 0 Ocq O - 00 1CD 0 0 1 0 IR 0 0" .0 0 ---------- — I C3 0 C3 10 0 o", i 0 C) (D 0 0" 00 R 0 10 q 1 Ci 0 CD rl� 0 10 Tr) m La o O o o 1 o l'ooIN to OD oD oo o to o c; -; 1 L c; ry u) L6 ooo In C-4 O'd. o c C=! 600 Ito o o o jo o o I I o t oo R O o t cl) N o O C, W) R cR q eq o o — . o I- 0 0 IND o 10 0 C! CM N '0 co, 0 l 0 Ol O Lq C, f U) 00 I''00 0!0 oa co, OR 00 co 0 0 ti N C, 0 0 I C, R 11 A 0 0 -Or .0 11 o Ui jN C4 ooo In a C-4 O'd. o c C=! 600 Ito tm (u ti E 0 0 IND o 10 0 C! CM N '0 co, 0 l 0 Ol O Lq C, f U) 00 I''00 0!0 oa co, OR 00 co 0 0 ti N 0 0 AC., 11 A � co, -Or .0 11 o Ui jN 0 LO n u ooo In a qo o o c oo c tm (u ti E VV) (D ao2 L) C 7 0 M N LO r O N O M N co a N 4- 0 co r 0 fa CL N N c� 0 N a O 2 w W is U C O .O O 2 W W M U M s M ti tl' 4-11 ��// O r v— Oi,#a, o1� ( 0 Ia1a ©a, r>m�o o ILV II+ Cl) IM ---- r, - - - - �-...--- �o �c IC', �® co C, is v ---r--- - .---�.----�--- N I;; Ice Iv I� ti N C, j p 11e N I I �ol mrn ueo� rea i cNi U444444 m c i (D v r HE 0)'E of aj, w c g O .o u...9 % j/ ii o L) { o d X n A oe il o� 10o V C ti 7 O M N Ln r O N O M V- r N O O r N M M CL N N M O N O 2 w w co U C O O 2 LU W U � a N r• r °�' N In rp dv N rn r P o CD M r r . el• " [V a N 4 Ne 7 Nv O M O O O h O C) cc d N R Cd G Cd d, ids hb t6 idN o` foo �MO reop oo Mop Cl cl R(3)0 rraa- �(D Ipp p0 �1 ® 1 N 1 O CD pM N p N V �, 1 p O O !D p ov R>0 ;dm ,c= 5 coo r� IT A, 4 Ne 7 Nv O M O O O h O C) cc d N R Cd G Cd M O O N co e dr �M N "T 1 1F 1 I 1„y N M 1 1 4p N N 11) S%b N Rdb C�,h 1 ODp I(O 1 C`,3 C 1 1 N U c c r c U = ,(EaC E5 LL 0r ov R>0 ;dm ,c= 5 coo r� 4 Ne 7 Nv O M O O O h O C) cc d N R Cd G Cd rel 0 M N LO r O N O M r r N O O N O rn co IL N N M r Cl N O 5 w w co U C O N O 2 w w M U m o r- u> tlo ,N N11 NO M. O O O OD o c o 0 0 lail Jai/. Ln N CD r bus Nro q,n OD m M N NOD 'r J�//�f 44ro im'n N /%�DiC Y��OWi �O N IIti rn 1� % b Ir �u) I r>I a0 I rn wee /WIn N .y �� Y������ OD,cun�'�( �' M CO N (O N M ' �,✓/i///���. N c n ,n N i r> G1 r ��/% f✓�i //� m c c L) W T i U 7 y v rn n E rn // al E c , i�°%� a� y . — ' °' ,CQ a f9i / ,�/r o a� 3 0 o c cacu q mx ONO./ a Lryp ,g ,y , 0 a W pOp 00 0 O co N Lb Lb M 0 H 5 CL O M N LO r O N O M N N r N L- O r N N 0) c6 d N N M_ O N O c G W W M U E O N O 2 W W_ c0 U "(D "co "co cj ;o „o �(D v, N N w fD ' W t'� U c 'vrn ;T _.o..-....�..ow....� c E c LL ac Od "y EU '>c� 'c 0 o �0 0 10 l0 o �o - N ce) I— 1NIti_ 1N a) Icn JI q Ilo 1� to Iti Irk Cl) N 1. W0('D Iti iO N N X0'1 v «� 6) «m « Al 1 � 1 « -N 1N « pj Ati 01 App «N A AN A « « - --L ---- L .... «M ---- L---- t'� U c 'vrn ;T °� "E�v Acm c E c LL ac Od "y EU '>c� 'c �'3 Ad0 00 'rnS c , off � to 'OO '� d c Q N LON 0 0 0 0 N N 0 O ai C O cc d Im O O W 7 d' LO C) N 0 M r as 0 N N M O N cO G w w w U C O .N O w w m U Lo N ; rte 0 C 10 OL N ff r x e a r r I 11Ai 4 � O r 0 a 0 r 0 ` o boi a4 C M m ry O W OHOaN # V a 1 1 1 1 1 1 r LO 1 I O AF M M O N M 1 In 1 O 1 M 1 Ill 1 eD 1 1 (0 � W 0 O O M 1 0 1 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 H 1 1 1 1 1 1 t a ami 1 1 1 w c o c aL y w y w O. FA a Hyl t Y l I 1 c' l0 10 10 q �O a O ZC. to CD 'o 1 11 �o 1 1 I 1 1 1 i r cli Q ti .o °° dti co (0rc N v Z. /l ; C*4 C wr G' O lu' �G, N iQi+ O N C L W o m 16 U r a U m CO Ia ai J 10 'CV. a r ° �, a = C d ° C " O V C OIC E C L o N N y d O C) C r = N E :. r� O a r 0 � v a v It LO 0 N C) M r a) (o 0 N O N a) O) (o d N N M_ Cl N U O 2 W W (o U C O a) O Z> W W (13 U a) C 1: L O a) L (n m O Q O U C _T C 0 C O Cu C O C U U a) Q (n U a) O O_ C O a) Cl) ca m U N U ca `m L U U a) W �1 N (o U U N Q U .0 O a C O 'O a) (n m m a) (n D C a) (n N > U co C O U 3 N C O U O Z a) (n N L a c O U 3 N C O U L C O U C U O c rn C ca O U U m L U 2 T 7 N U co U LP U a) Q to U a) O li c O m N ca m (n li H a) U L a) m co U U a) t� to U a) O Q c O a) to m a) (n O w N C O (moo 7 1m a) w Q U 1. O a) (n (o m C O ca a) 0 d' N LD F- M O N :_ m N a) F— Ib 0 C) N C a) a) a) a) U C C O a) (n m m C O N _rn T a) C W N C a) E N 6 N a) (o U C O a) (n co m C O cu _rn N (o G i w 1 r c ao :o noo ,m u.U)o ea m w ro O "10 «O w0 r 00 ,O 10 r0 X O I w h t e M tl 4 « w ti r W 1 w X M a 1 .. s......_.__...n_a_.�...,....wL,..J.......li........�.......Ys...®...a.A..�..v�.au.....a.�....4..,..�. n.«d�� n..w, O G O 1 0 O10 IO 1CDN LO N N N N j O )M o to I N m� N Ia0 Na )f0 IM 0 1 IN O NO )(0 LO N N N I X U M � N I. 0 ri O n n X X Y N N « r 6i p 1 1. M 1 N 1 1 j O b 4 I i I I I X U M M 0 ri O n n X X 1 « r °> u' a) r a) " -(a N N N t N c e c X m y r I d n w« « a d m rod + O 1= a) a r C al n C 1 V 1 V « V r V n p 1 C + N + N . Z :, 1 0 r 0 p J0 o p a C) 0 -1 +Z r I LL e LL aLLI rW .W W u W « s L, n Yn I C � w C1 w C a d) w « X r w C �m iia wca ;t ro M U aci ;U b0 " CL c ' 0 d co r' () " 4) a) E a ro "m sro r 5 ,o "O e0 m0 XO w0 ea. 7 « 7 X 7 r 7 r U w C « C cr C W a) r! 1 2 « y) r N Y J e J e J w J cu e J ns , 0 L "L " "..0 w` uL .� ° C "� 1 ` 0 0 0 :L s N 0 M Ill (6 a - N 07 r 0 N 0 0 C w w cu U C O a) 0 2 w w m U tiNO 04~ rIIn XCxCXpXpf«N« r O(O O � N rO ( asn(�7 «ya�n N 0a 00 O ( O Ci 0 :CO CF) 6 h 4 N (D m ;6i "N�et .V ,f0 0) 6 r p� pI`� .Leqt l` N` pt I— 0) NM r 9 I « r b # a tl X « Y Y w I M r' M b. e Y d d' ®.I-.....er....._+®®.N... d N tl d a X r • r e Y X F qi I N b I Y Y I N IN N Iw N N I q N N N N N Ii I N d I Y d I V b I m W I N It I Y II I I I I I II I I N f v I N N I P N I N I I Y @ I N N N N I I I I I N N w N I 6 & I N N I Po N I N k N N I N I I I If f # 4 I N & f V I N b IV a 6 I N fi i Ei N I d p' N Y U' I I I I i I I I II I I I III a N I b I I N I 1 k N N t d I I I I i f I I I I 4 N I w I I I 9 f N N y I I I 0 9 I I I I N I I I I I P I ucp f I� r— 'I.MN OD CO 00 �tia NPo^II �h NI1 'ti 'rD MG%I N U O N M N Ipp Op IN INI IN M I— (�j N pN C 00 c0 eD ' 00�N N iIIf I M N I N I N' N I I I I I I I fl N q p I 1 N N B t � R N � N I N 1 I N pPi I I I I I II I dl 9 I I f W B r I I Y A N I I U I I i II I I I I I I I b I N m € I I N I N I I M I I f I I N 9 t I M I 0 « v 1 « I (6 I a0 0 CO X CO " � r. CO « r « I C e C C e C Y C } I I e #X c J " C r ' d r y.. N X y N " N r N "'O cp 1: N r wJ « n ' a rJ Xp « Q' XI -p XO' «IY Y2'rQ' rH� F IHI r IHd IFN # XE x ,I-� ;� �� �� � aci � (1)� W� Wa '�wZ d�9 ���M ��� r�D ��G o-�P: Z) ate{ 4Z) ;�� � a- a) M n �3 �3 �� � �$ «$ «$ a$ CD Y c > cc cc > I>� r o I'p ICl) I=p IU r=p XU y=p «U a=p NU) r ... X h...�X...f.«r.r...f...f...r,..r 1 L ... t...r•..h,r,.t ... fw..t...f...h...hXw 6 Y # N 9 y ,a N a'a «' N' N a ' N Ia y a Ya U)' Xa N Xa ' (A Xa ' N «a +' N a ' N ra a <a «a U I>20 I'o Nl U)>0 `'> '> >N > "> c I c C m m, m m Q � r U U U U b U U « U X U « U r U U . U U d U U X j ; j r j X j U l 0 I 0 Uw n (D r N Y a) ro11) ro(11 a 0 d x r X « U ) lin :5 IU) .U) a(/) COr I I7 aM d.M e,p a � a r a A ; a r - v It 0 N O M r N 0 N N M Co N 'o O W W U c O N O w W m U E E U) c O .N N W 0 N , 6 tl " ti "� L " I, - d r-- w O 0 O 0 r N O tlw O O " O " O " O " O ° O "' O « + 6 r tl 6 X fD 6 6 d r p p p p p 6 N . N 6 N N N 6 a a 6.. M « d Cl) d oOct ry «. « p « « « « « 6M rN wti r� Xt� eN «ti °� 6 ww N d r m r N tl v d N d e µ « . 6 d 1 tl 6 I I N I i I N Y I Y I Y Po N N I Y p I 4 1 1 1 Po Po Ni N W N 1 1 Po Po tl ! W Po N 1 I I Y I i N I N I m I I C P II Y II Po Po # Po i 1 1 Po 1 I N @ 1 II Po k @ I N N I k I M 0 1 q Y Y I f M N Po N II 1 1 t 1Po G 1 Y 0. 1 Po Po Po & 1 Po Po I I 1 NI f Cl) I I I Y N N N I Y I Y I & N I Y N NN r-: 1 0 p N N Y ti I pp Y d N I N C I M N N p q I N k 0 I IM Y i I Y I I €O Q NO _ I 9 I N N_N� N �qp NO N V I Iti Yp Np IP7 It` NO N qM NIM M qd. NM 9�, II M bqy IM M NM O Ik ,�� O ip N(O N I N I O 1 0 Y 1- 1� r' 1 �' Y I� N N 1 N O Po p N V O 1 Po O W % p W I N 1 1 N Po 1 C m O 1` r N Po N Po N N I N i 1 I N I 1 N� N O N N I t• k.M I IO 1 NO I NM I O I(n N� IO 1� �� 1� 1� i� N� 1� IN YO X N N I N NN N V Nti Iti 1L NO I N k'� O 1L q N N N N N N 1 Y Y I 0 N M Y N E Po� I N F Po- 4 t� 0 N 4 IIIm Po N III N. Po I 1 � 1 N N I I N 1 i & N W N Po Po 1 N 1 Po 4' N 1 I. w 1 n 1 Po N 1 N r w N N 1 11g r I 1 Po IE yp 1 ii fl Po I 1 I 1 I I N I I 1 N N N U I 1 Y I I N N l I xC: 6c U U x U 6 a LL da wa «CL dLL d r C . O X C X O d C rC « O O d C d 0 d yN„ r e r X 6 r 0 X aJ 6 0 « N 6 (a 6 0 " 6 0 N X O d 0 N X O 0 .� 6. 0Y e. r U U U T l6 1 D L.1 ,( « w « , , N , N , y , y , y ,. _ a� µ. r d r O r O e` 6 O r r O r 6 e tl r T« O 6 O > "> > > "> '� «� w7 e� ;: a 6p Y LL , ea e. Y rLL r Y e v r C "p e 6'� LL r �6 w O q9 6 r w, w y0., 6 n .0, n. x r I>p . d a « e CU r d 6 X -v r O a C C _2 a C r C e C 6 O 0 «� s� >� r, n I— w ♦— r ca �� N -o d O do o d� d� ;� p� d o d o r o ; o r o ro r o eo o« ro o ,o d� r� r o d a w n « a « a " n rE " o " E w r o " a> . LL 6 LL , 9 . LL ,, LL , .0 w LL d x 0 d 0 w 0 d 0 a 6 0 r ,. V "= . O e 7 w T 6 . D r ID d N (n " fn tl 0 " Ui a a) 6 e m ' fA e Z X O d 0 « O 6 C r C r C w C M_ d C cis e C w C X C C C M_ �° w ; v 0 r0 d0 .0 k . 0 6 o X o d o X o w r ,. 6 r 6 6 c d c c 6 c c a «a ¢ "a a ..f...�6...p..66H...�...�...f...f...f...t...h...t...f...t...F,..r...F...f...h...f...F..ryr...f.. . r r d a) Mem `m nm m a� `m `m {> > r> o r> o N C. . w .. @ r 0 w w x U)a oe N e d6 M « � ry d , " a E E U) c O .N N W 0 N n r LO 0 N O M (6 r) r N 4- O LO N 0) M a_ N N M r O N O W O c � � O V *' U C 41 � N U) C c > U U W d o U r C N 4 r C) N O M r ca 0 N O (4 N 0) (0 IL N N M_ O N 0 0 2 w LU U c O C0 G W W m U cc C G 0 W 0 N M Y M r e 0 r'M M M N N N 61 YO r OM �M r' 61 r 0 N �`Of Cl) M N N r ONi M ». V n. v ON 61 r N Gi O Gti�0 10 I{ryN co U) DO Xp O IYp ! O NO"O O m = I C I OD � N i 6? ` I„ M to c o 0 �. 0 O N O N f- Xo I� IN �lw t` DCVO Ln � O a i,.� G N 1 Oc"j 1 Cl! 1 0 s N N ak i 00 OR I NO ISN �O Ln N N x 0 0 r O Y O "N n f0O + N N M M e r0 0 10r[6 e 0 xm O a M r ± a p 9 Cl) p I OI W M I o d0' I� O I O ko 0 0 to co aT o X0 1M p,o f I X X E0 � M N O � O � 0 o Xo po co 0 Io y m j N 1 M Cl) ., .. ..I -.---'- -. ....�Y ..__.N ...., I� O IIOI�� 1 h �O !N0 I ONE X O �O DO R O {M�pp 7 Ln 0 0 10 10 ch co ORo 0 goo jo '0 I I ti ti M jjj -r, . 0 p 1 0 0~ OD. �, M N (000 100 �ID N X 1 N v N SON 00 3 10 ' X p _ .. Io _. IN XI --_-I --- OD LO co COIJ co N 00l 61 1 N 1 I M M m OR 1 X �aa O I Cl) N 12 LMW e 0 co an ;r +m ;v m C N M MOI C CD O ION wNd' w� IM *N O) I I` 'i W r O 00 IM x�. I'It xN 0. ... ®.. j 0 N LD „ pOj O N O O N O Y O O O O O �. O O _4 �� co co a t00!ems YM a o �a C') - - i --- ----- rr Cl) N.. 1O Iti N� N W MoD c~ PC . (MD (D p N d' 1p� 0 1p� O M M IM IIS IO IfD e- 6 I O u OM Y N a O IO IO O r00 O 0 X O M r O O O O w 0 I O w 0 w M N ' w. .+w,.w{�..u..ww. �yr.s•w-+o-.w+�r w..w-m-.w�n•w-w.w.w, //%r N �N M O �O Ow Mo �o oD oo Cl)jCl) jo jo v Io Mo AS. S O II // N // (6 4rCR / 9 M i M M VY N O 10 _ O 1® t0 o yo Irn 10 to 0 f/ r �LO so O M O N O O M O (0 V O ' O 'O O �O O 1 /f %�/, (D tD G o® I V o I N N / i� %� CY)l / % it //Ol NN C. a LOo In N l s rr1// �r /a r. ` ��//% CD M Dy p N N LLJ����� ��/�a o N I IIIco W is RIP , 0 1 tel' ai c / r � m U O _ a/r/ %i�/ i .r -.- .� A ---- i��.,--- /%% /%/ C co as / m IM N m Q O I0 p@ M o �r" %ja// .w ww w'w�4w.wu:ww o — O/ /pi//, //�r� LU O /// LLI U NcNi 4) N t6 L a C O V 7 O 0 41 L a C O cc Q. L. a C T3 0 4.O N a) L) 5 a v v O CO) cli La O cc co r h r O .r O w O is c d .O .y d C O of N 01 M N O O N O � R N = 0) d (0 .O 4_ N O C O O N ti N O O w 3 O a N C (V y M O 'C N! N U O t wa Ncr W_ C y ti U � T co c c c m c o U > cc cu OU' CL +�+ WO O y +O_+ U! U) 'O Z m d) U Q a ) 0 0 0 fA O N N CL E 0 U e z� a N ri 7 N N M r O N a O W W w U E O Z a� O 2 LU w_ f U ti r O N M C cu O () m L m t L Qi N M 7 O N O M r N 0 O r 07 cu Q_ N N M r 0 N 0 0 2 W W cu U c 0 \a) c0 G W W (0 U a N M d ti 'ti v 'v I o to o Io o to o Io m Ia oD I O m 1 M O 10 1 O 10 O I O a N I N V 1 ('D 0 I C V N I N � 1 L O ' O O � O O � O o .o 1 I rn Im v Iv m Im co I. M _-_E_r.. 1 1 Olf 1W �N IN Ocl) 1 C 1 1 N 'u) (p 1 (O (M I M _„..__F N I N N ' W 1 M I M 1 � 1 1 N ~ 1 � (7 1 M o Ip is m 'm 1 l7 1 M _ I 1oD ~ 1 � N I N o I G 1 N I N R ' W 1 I In IA I N OII O clj N ' N OD co 1 � 1 I M 1 M Ln 1 N ,m rn 'a a �E �c h v v LO 0 N O M r O N N _M O N a O W W a U C O N a O W W fO U M qe s W,� o :123 :wo n � x co ;m :ti ,M : V O' O' O O' O CO y0 �O O em . m . CA a, 0 CD GW a O O Il? a N co ti r. "-44-_-4-- I I 1 O lo :0 j 0O N I O I O I In (O O 1 m I M I c o 'It I U I M I 1 1 1 0 0' 0' 0' 0 I-- . o' O :(71 ' O OD , co 0 , to , (0 1 1 1 1 1; I 1 0 10 IO 10 O 10 W OD W OD I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 ( 1 1 1 1 O to 10 l0 O '., 1- I co I (O I (O r (O 1 1 1 .� :a ro- Q:N:N:m: .C7 •C7 :_ M 0 U) 0 0 0 0 00O O O O ti c Cl) O O O O O Cl) O O �a O G) 0 O fO . 0 M n O O O wj1 O W N M_ 0 0 U) C2 0 L Lo LOO m 0 o y co 0 rn Y) 0 1 ch ii N N T rn N C w tu O N !-m N N M CD N 0 O w W IM U C O Ill cO G w W_ m U of ro � o N N kO 'N 'fD (D DC; 0.1 °O N « m X O e N N ID `W N to o to o I 1 1 �_ m I O I M I 1c- 1 O 10N O � O O i 0 In I N 1— 111 a0 Xn 1 ao l 0 1 0 rnN ICA.- IMrn INOO ti I m t o M I rn I O 1 0 0I N I r 1 O N ICO I O 1 (A rnN MCO A IMrn NO to ti N m I 1 L. O O O O O 0 0 O O q 0 e 0 e 0 O k 0 e 0 e 0 MM-M+�•a,1n_.-e. e.-pje-e-e MM.M:} w. pl � W I I I I I o t o I r I ti o to to to o to I,o to 0 1 0 1 ti I ti o Io 10 to C; 1 I I 1 ! i I tl 1 o NNN o Ri •— I� 1 O N p 1 0 1 0 o Lo I$o io' D �o to io ----- ----- IA p M 1 p M i p O 1 co 0 0 N rn I (D I N I ID 1 (p 1 (D 1 o-- I I m -Frr> cou I 1°r° Im I O 1 O I M I � O i O to �. e -R. LU s.. W ; u ; (a c Xz z� e N M e M e V r uOi A. N N o Ni ; m n orrrn I ---"r - N 10 ICSH IOv ON d� tlOv W 1N IN It I k Nv otr IO Iry 1� I0 D � � 10 0 t o I p o D :o O o 0 ' O 00 ° O + O ro 'o eo o o ko «o a o o �o CO�p�p Xo 10 1 1 W O W. O IN II ko O 1� IoM tl m p A N O I O I N --r---- r---' -r--- � O 0 1 0 O 0 I O 2N I� tl Oco W 0 O Irn0 Im C) IO O O N (O O - - ! N 1� D :o O o 0 ' O 00 ° O + O D ro o Xo 'o eo o o ko «o a o o �o Fo Xo v o r---'-'r--.,,r.......r^--- I 1... l0 IOv 1� WO�t O 0 1 0 O 0 I O 2N I� tl Oco W 0 O Irn0 Im C) IO I p N (O O Wy M I r 1� N v I O a NMS 1 N O M 0 V l o o W� W O V Woo I N I o O M m o BI- Ico 10 N� Ir 10 1 1 W O W. O r---'-'r--.,,r.......r^--- I I m Q1 « U) C l0 IOv 1� WO�t IM IN fi� IOM � N o Imo I o r h o Ir- WC6 N (O I N Wy M I r �. as W O V N v I O a IIyIyIyyI M M N 1 N O M Irony I.mO Io Iro BI- Ico 10 N� to O I M 1 N w N O I m Q1 « U) C oM k J f O X> Y °. IoN ryoMo� crO Irr'�.om pO0 WW1 IO0 I,rO WvO N (O I N Wy M I r I 1NOC, rOn (O loo 1 o tl� to O I M 1 W O W. O II ko O M IoM tl m p I••• O N 'M ; O Wo rn O I p I D O N O I. O I. N pO 0 O I N W o m MN y(O r ro NO Y (A r m wyl wrn O a ao O + 1 r {O 0 p..N M O Y � + j(O O Yh N w N O I m Q1 « U) C k J f O X> Y °. � Y a 2 uO rya o X N w N O a v v LO O N O M T- ai 0 N N M_ CO N O 2 W w U c O .5 a) cO G UJ w f U Lc; 2 0 ;� ,o sa rvYn w o co .. u w W « u « Yo M M a; w o « Yp N . a)CI a � r do cj =o Ir 00 o �® a f.5 u 0 o co 1 t«0� tl _" -- YNn tiv N, r7 W,N NNO O I O r NI OD D C4 r N0, s M 0 m-..-.m-IO N pv jN ry jN 0~i Macy c14o- rn 10 Ilii N '.ODN CQ __ CL -A. 1 __ __ 0 0 «o 0 0 0 o o o «. �, o « « o o O o 'o' ,0 ,o «o ,0 .o ,0 «0 'o 0 Og o 10� Noy 100 IN n O 1` M O m' j� a Y O p tl 4 O . -4 ---- ��...--.- ---' p j an v1 00 r0 0o c) a loo 00 U) 4'U) `a l0 ti 0 m # 1- I 9 .- I w ! N 0 M N N 0 � O . O O O N O O o" r0� IoM Illov I%ta �M 00 x{00 I.N0 YNo j,0 „0 Lf) 1 to 1 M 1— 1'. N N OM- OM - M 10 ® ILO p r iMO E W O C r 0 0 W ay I aM O_..• O T - 001 [7Y,0 �O0 I�'N Np 0 Or ODIrn ro to 10 o 4-4 ---- - r-_ . 01 IIOM IN OM M 0.0 10O W O 1No W.,O 01 r I- I N b O G O O NI'-fNN a� I1 N pop a0 N p0 l0 N00 «„.-+ qN N M + L ..... L _ _ a . _ - _ L N v_ v 2 « «_ JI N Y d C M >O N « 3ca « f 0w y,3 a «C9 0 a T N O T N M M N co aDo to f0 0 to N Cl) co N N. N 00i 'O M Illy 1 I�0 r`o uoioo Ivi fNc ao I0 �co Ito Io N, ---� ---`'# -- - -� ---- I'---- �d rn IoM N<, gouNi N V U�� �/ o 0o Iy Io 0 W f�t f r-^�-__n--`--- err -- W y 1� J�' L ccoo a Y~ o ei !! 1° 1 F5 000 N M oo I m N co O I. I feu co N ND °cT 1�0 1 Gpy Kl" + i a I.. O d :2 tom' W = / N v a / rr wW =/j Nvc w� (6 'g, U M C ' 1��% Q Iii w. ,. Go M O� N co CCLN 0 N 0 U) 0 0 N NT � M CILN 0 F- v Ln 0 N 0 M N m 0 N N cli Co N a O 2 W W U C O m G W rn M ±' ui 2 rti co Ycq ~ H W "IhO cli a oND rM04 �o dco 'a e C L e L) _ Y3v w� e c h>o r� ` N Yy 9 tY d r 3 e S (D e di Q d e r. •mow, o h 0 co N co N O N r N 10 0 M N N N 0 H L CD Cd O Cl) L (0 a) 2 LA /m V Fa 3 m Z C O a) rn Z) r fop I 1o0 rtt{{ 00 D p I ap i 00 los INC,' &O R IM Itr u W A b O 0 co N p M p M !S!ID N r h I m N ti N M N Q N Y� C) i coo I , I co NM #� O IIDD i coM I °� I t0 Nco{,� p Y P� Y N p 0 Yyat to 1 o Np�j CD 9 p N ti 0 O+ A N i M Y N+ Lo Y () Y W + LV P,r 4N Y (V 'm --__L _...L-.. _L._ - - L - - - 'a e C L e L) _ Y3v w� e c h>o r� ` N Yy 9 tY d r 3 e S (D e di Q d e r. •mow, o h 0 co N co N O N r N 10 0 M N N N 0 H L CD Cd O Cl) L (0 a) 2 LA /m V Fa 3 m Z C O a) rn Z) G IL v It Ln 0 N O M N N M r O N a O w W U c O U) N cO C W W U O M IOD O 0 OD ' (V W r N r r N o1 M ,1, 2 M O Cl) 1 fD 1 W ti iZo o to C; to 1 c In I Ir- 1 m 1 N 1 N fD 1 t` 1 in 00 1 M 1 W 1 OnD r 1 � - -..L- - O N O N O ' M O O M ' Cl) t N N # a o l 1 . c 1 0 1 N 1M M O N O N � O 1 O N 1- 1 1 a v w M 1� (D 1 M O 1 � O a O a W 1M 0 1a 1 t 1 k t N N O pk O t00O �0O _ 1 1m 1a r 1 p 1 N 1. N 0 NU') Cl 1 aD N 1 ti 1 r � a a c 4 0 U N d N C m W—; rail q N co 0 coo" mI C, 0 0 OD to 0 .0 . I- cl Lr) Of vc* o 'o rco 4 a) 0 * 0 , n 0 g 0 o 0 C) 0 C) 0 C , 0 C:, o O C� 10 � ce) C, No C; .0 Ci ja C -i R R C, CD C) 0 o N O M.oi c -)Ito. o a) to cl) C, Na o L ---- 0 * 0 , n 0 g 0 o 0 C) 0 C) g 00 in 5 (D IR CD OD 0) C6 C6 co, 0 M I0 0 ID *0 0 Lo ro TL Ca u C 0 11-4 1 0 0 0 ja 'D R R 0 C, Na o g 00 in 5 (D IR CD OD 0) C6 C6 co, 0 M I0 0 ID *0 0 Lo ro TL Ca u C 7 T - C14 O 00 r N O7 Id IL N N M T- C) N O 5 LU w_ m U C O N O w LU m U G���% (� 1/� O 'ef ^'I` "ro In eo a r` o d�; --� r ----w--------1 CD sD�� I NI CD/ 0 100op lop No M O O V:N O I N 0 LO �/ 1 ODM 13 y 1 N 1� 1 N O 1 0 N YO 1 No io C> io N ° 1 L6 iln m to 4 4 _. W I Cl) C a CD I c) ( D / h I t` R N o3 I I� o v i� rr ��� IN%O noo I� IM(p td N 7 f N I N N 1 �, in 1a 1m 10 Iti r I N G /� �� fO M I y 0 I �_� I S N E N do N 17 O N N O O m a 0 N 7 v U) 0 N 0 M �O. N IW N N M O Cl '6 CO G W w U C O e cO G W W NU U m N C J V 4 I,: co o ti M Cl) M ,f0 M m , M M M 91a O Q O O C=; 1ti Y �I O IM bM N V' cO N IO C; o #O p #O o Nr o 0 II P,rn ce) Irn Do 1� to co pN M Cl) LO W N O ad U W U) I� C N O Q E O U C LO 0) C U U Na) w N C 7 v lqt LO 0 N 0 M N N 0 N N M O N cO G LU W_ m U C 0 CD CO G LU W U fl% �gr co �0 WO ea wN /J l p ID 1( -01 co OD C /I m OM O rO Oo ..... I O1'NI 1 O OI I M O 10 �� O 1 O /� N N --j tD��J N... 1 Cl) a? 1 Of Q% N 1 N (n M '' •-f�' _ � '-R�if�!� %!rf7��(l; Cl) e��-"•ww"�w".�'M:-3'. NNS www .wwy.n N ;Mr',.N 1� Iti 10 (0U) C14 �l 1 N 1 h 1 CO 1 °D1 a N C, V m N d r 3 • 1 O O M o ao G%%ll , ✓, IQ 0 1 f0 i0 M OI lV co W O O 0 O 0 ti O N OI N fG N fOD� O f CL v O N O M r N O r N N O ca 0.. N N M O N a CO C LU w U c O .y N O 2 w w a5 U pf�ii/lJ�//�/d��� 6i // a DD n M m fD MW j rJ� ��r� Y� N M a 01 0 0 coa �,ro o �o o o N N N 1 a N 1`1- _ M 1IgJJ ) O II i 10 IIO i tO r 0 1l fo Cj I~ O M y r f'l J,I W O 1�. O N M q w7..n'+m-a"a"e.7.A �..+n,Wwr "a.w..w" "n w'.w"ro « •`"'. V 77/11 gg ca VIE_ '0 CL .Sg 00 d 0) 4) Q O V— Appendix,D Traffic Study Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project ESA / DI 30953 Administrative Draft Environmental Impact Report April 2015 City of'Baldwin Park Downtown Specific Plan EIR Traffic Study February 20, 2015 Prepared by The Mobility Group City of Baldwin Parkow tow TOD Specific Plan EIR Traffic Study February 20, 2014 Prepared by The Mobility Group 18301 Von Kannan Ave, Ste 490 Irvine, CA 92612 Zhaowang Ji TR 2667 City o Baldwin Park Downtown TOD S ecic Plan EIR Traffic Study Table of Contents 1. Introduction ..................................... ......................... .............. ................ :.................... 1 1.1 Project Description............................................................................................ 1 1.2 Study Scope.................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Organization of this Report ............. ............................................................... ". 1 2. Existing Conditions...................................................................................................- 4 2.1 Roadway System ........................................................................................... 4 2.2 Study Intersections......................................................................................... 5 2.3 Existing Intersection Conditions........................................................................ 8 2.4 Existing Transit Service.................................................................................... 15 3. Future Conditions Without The Project................................................................... 19 3.1 Traffic Forecasts..............».......................................................................... 19 3.2 Future Base Transportation System Improvements ......................................... 22 3.3 Future Intersection Conditions ................................. . ..... ................... 22 4. Future With Project Conditions .................... ..................,.................................. 29 4.1 Project Transportation Characteristics ............................... A.............................. 29 4.1.1 Transportation Systems.......................................................................... 29 4.1.2 Land Uses .............»............................................. ............ ........... 32 4.1.3 Project Trip Generation and Distribution ............................................... 34 4.2 Future Traffic Forecasts................................................................................... 37 4.3 Project Impacts............................................................... .... ....................... 37 4.4 CMP Analysis.................................................................................. ... 45 4.5 Existing With Project Impacts........:....»..».................................................... 47 5. Mitigation Measures...................:................::......:........................ ►....,,..............,........ 56 Appendix A Trip Generation Appendix B LOS Calculation Sheets The Mobility Group l February 20, 2014 Ci o Baldwin Park Downtown Trac Stud List of Figures Figure1.1 Study Area. »,.».... ..... ...... ................................................................................... 2 Figure 2.1 Project Study Intersection Locations..... ..... .»—.».........--...»................. ...... 6 Figure 2.2 Project Study Intersection Lane Configuration ............................................... 7 Figure 2.3 Existing Traffic Volumes — AM Peak Hour..........,: :..............................:....... 9 Figure 2.4 Existing Traffic Volumes — PM Peak Hour ................................................... 10 Figure2.5 Existing LOS------- .........-...»............................................................... 14 Figure2.6 Transit Lines................................................................ . .... ....................... 16 Figure2.7 Local Transit.................................................................................................. 17 Figure3.1 Location of Related Projects ........................................ :................................. 20 Figure 3.2 Future Without Project Traffic Volumes — AM Peak Hour ...................».»..,.. 24 Figure 3.3 Future Without Project Traffic Volumes — PM Peak Hour— .................. --.. 25 Figure 3.4 Future Without Project LOS.....................».»,.,....,.....,...................................... 28 Figure 4.1 Roadway Modification Concept ........................................ —...... .:............... 31 Figure4.2 Commercial TD.............................................................................................. 38 Figure4.3 Residential TD................................................................................... ...... 39 Figure 4.4 Future With Project Traffic Volumes — AM Peak Hour ...................... .:.... .... 40 Figure 4.5 Future With Project Traffic Volumes — PM Peak Hour ................................. 41 Figure4.6 FWP LOS.... ................................ I ... 1.11 ....................................................... 44 Figure 4.7 Existing With Project Traffic Volumes — AM Volume Diagram ................... 51 Figure 4.8 Existing With Project Traffic Volumes — PM Volume Diagram ................... 52 Figure4.9 EWP Int LOS ......................................... ........................... ............... ......... 55 The Mobility Group ii. February 20, 2014 City o Baldwin Park Downtown TOD S eciFc Plan EIR Kra 'c Stud List of Tables Table 2.1 Level of Service Definitions for Signalized Intersections .............................. 11 Table 2.2 Level of Service Definitions for Unsignalized Intersections ......................... 12 Table 2.3 Existing Conditions — Intersection Level of Service ...................................... 13 Table 3.1 Related Project List and Trip Generation Estimates ...................................... 21 Table 3.2 Future Without Project Conditions — Intersection Level of Service — AMPeak Hour................................................................................................ 26 Table 3.3 Future Without Project Conditions — Intersection Level of Service — PMPeak Hour................................................................................................ 27 Table 4.1 Land Use Projection Summary.. ...... ......... ........ ...•..•.. ......... ......... -.. 33 Table 4.2 Project Trip Generation Summary .................................................................. 36 Table 4.3 Future With Project Conditions — Intersection Level of Service AMPeak Hour ........ ........ --- ........ ,...... ........................................................... 42 Table 4.4 Future With Project Conditions — Intersection Level of Service PMPeak Hour ..................... :............................. ..:.................... :................ ...... 43 Table4.5 Transit CMP .....................................................................I.....:..... 48 Table4.6 Transit Capacity.......................................................................................... 49 Table 4.7 Existing With Project Conditions — Intersection Level of Service AMPeak Hour.. ., — . - . — - . ........................................................................ 53 Table 4.8 Existing With Project Conditions — Intersection Level of Service PMPeak Hour .......... ,.-....................................................,...6......................... 54 Table 5.1 Future With Project With Mitigation — Intersection Level of Service — AMPeak Hour ................ ......... ......... ................... ............ .............. 58 Table 5.2 Future With Project With Mitigation — Intersection Level of Service — PMPeak Hour .............. ........ ......... ........, ........., .......... , .....,...,.,........... 59 The Mobility Group iii February 20, 2014 (NIV of Itt m® ? x' a .wti LW_ w °I "_ 1. Introduction This report documents a traffic analysis to support a Program EIR for the City of Baldwin Park Downtown Transit Oriented District (TOD) Specific Plan. The general area of the project is located in central Baldwin Park. The Project Area is shown in Figure 1.1. 1.1 Project Description The proposed project involves the establishment of the City of Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan, including goals, and establishment of a land use program and circulation system that will provide a pedestrian -friendly, mixed-use environment, in a transit -oriented district around the existing Metrolink Station. The Specific Plan is fully described in the City of Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan 1 document. 1.2 Study Scope The scope for the analysis in this study was determined in conjunction with the City of Baldwin Park including the geographic coverage, input assumptions, and methodologies used in the analysis. The analysis addresses the AM and PM peak hours which are the times of the day when the street traffic volumes in the area are highest. For purposes of analysis a future horizon year of 2035 is assumed. The study includes an analysis of: ■ Existing Conditions • Future 2035 Without Project Conditions ■ Future 2035 With Project Conditions Future 2035 With Project and Mitigation Existing With Project Conditions Existing With Project and Mitigation 1.3 Organization of this Report The remainder of this report is organized as follows. Chapter 2 describes the existing transportation conditions in the area of the Project. Chapter 3 addresses future conditions (year 2035) without the Project and sets the future cumulative baseline for analysis of Project impacts. Chapter 4 provides a description of the proposed Project and its transportation 1 City of Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan, Public Review Draft — December, 2014. _�.............. 1"lac Mobility Group l February 20, 2015. I �ft"s&LO, characteristics, including trip generation, distribution of Project trips, and analyzes potential transportation impacts of the Project, including traffic, transit, and a Congestion Management Program evaluation. Chapter 5 identifies any proposed transportation mitigation measures for the Project. l e c;11 1- li Group February 20, 2015 2. Existing Conditions 2.1 Roadway System 1?egional &2_m The Project Site is located in the San Gabriel Valley. The closest freeways to the Project Area are the San Bernardino Freeway (I-10), which runs in an east -west direction and is located to the south of the Project Site, and the San Gabriel River Freeway (1-605) which runs in a north -south direction and is located to the west of the Project Site. The San Gabriel River Freeway (I-605) also provides access to the Foothill Freeway (I-210), which runs in an east - west direction and is located to the north of the Project Site. North -So tit a &Teets Baldwin Park boulevard: Baldwin Park Boulevard is classified as an Arterial in the City's General Plan. It is a four -lane street with central turn lane (north of Ramona Boulevard) or raised median (south of Ramona Boulevard), and left turn lanes are provided at intersections. On -street parking is generally provided on both sides of the street with some restrictions. Mpqinc Avenue: Maine Avenue north of the intersection with Pacific Avenue is classified as a Collector street in the City's General Plan. It is a four -lane street with central turn lane and left turn lanes are provided at intersections. On -street parking is not allowed on the east side of the street, and is allowed on the west side in certain areas with some time restrictions. West of the intersection with Pacific Avenue, Maine Avenue is a two-lane local street and on - street parking is allowed on both sides of the street (see Figure 2.1). Pacific Avenue: Pacific Avenue is classified as a Collector street in City's General Plan. It is a four -lane street and left turn lanes are provided at intersections. On -street parking is generally provided on both sides of the street with some restrictions. Merced Avenue: Merced Avenue is classified as a Collector Street in the City's General Plan. It is a four -lane street and on -street parking is generally provided on both sides of the street with some restrictions. Stewart Avenue: Stewart Avenue is a two-lane street and is classified as a local street in the City's General Plan. On -street parking is generally provided on both sides of the street. The Mobility Group 4 February 20, 2015 r (Wc � . )ow ! s r 'W _'�` ca air t'1 rr %"C ""' � a st 1 Bogart Av ,I, aew Bogart Avenue is classified as a local street in the City's General Plan. It is a two-lane street and on -street parking is generally provided on both sides of the street with some restrictions. Downill Avemig. Downing Avenue is classified as a local street in the City's General Plan. It is a two-lane street and on -street parking is generally provided on both sides of the street with some restrictions. Fuente Avenue: Puente Avenue is classified as a Collector street in the City's General Plan. It is a two-lane street north of Root Street and is a four -lane street south of Root Street. On - street parking is generally provided on both sides of the street with some restrictions. J,,ast- _Wes 1 1reets Ramon _Boulevard- Ramona Boulevard is classified as an Arterial in the City's General Plan. It is a four -lane street with wide curb lanes and raised median, and left turn lanes are provided at intersections. On -street parking is generally prohibited on both sides of the street. In some areas, diagonal off-street parking is provided in areas immediately parallel to and connected to Ramona Boulevard. Badillo Street: Badillo Street is classified as a local street in City's General Plan. It is a four - lane street with raised median and left turn lanes are provided at intersections. In the Specific Plan area, on -street parking is allowed on the south side of the street but is prohibited on the north side. Clark. Street. Clark Street is classified as a local street in the City's General Plan. It is located north of Ramona Boulevard and largely just outside the Specific Plan area. It is a two-lane street with on -street parking permitted on the north side but not on the south side of the street. Left turn lanes are not provided at intersections. ffig QA&Li_Aycnye,, Big Dalton Avenue is classified as a local street in the City's General Plan. It is located south of Ramona Boulevard and outside the Specific Plan area. It is a two- lane street with on -street parking permitted on the both sides of the street. 2.2 Study Intersections A total of sixteen study intersections were identified, in conjunction with City of Baldwin Park staff, for inclusion in the traffic analysis. The analyzed locations are shown in Figure 2.1 and correspond to locations where potential traffic impacts from the Project are most likely to occur. All of these intersections are signalized except for the intersection of Pacific Avenue & Bogart Avenue which is minor street stop -controlled. The existing lane configurations for these sixteen analyzed intersections are shown in Figure 2.2. The intersections identified for analysis are as follows: .....�_". ebra___ 5 t+'�l�Ka��y 20, 2015 C A a v tz CLd U) c 3 0 C C 0 3 U 0 0 0 O Y C m - a N C LT- m -z X114 z l alb .�. ._- hff -� hff► �' hfP hf �- hf fWd W f— 4- cy N hlf hlf h hff C a LO 3 H 0 r oa c o m L° E o y o c 9 : aa) rn h Z 7 W U OI (n J o N C X* r, 4- cy N hlf hlf h hff C a LO 3 H 0 _............ ` ' F "� a—11A ��',�.p���r��� ��'�� a� • � ���� uRr " RJB' �. r�� ��...... m.� �_ 1. Ramona Boulevard & Maine Avenue 2. Ramona Boulevard & Bogart Avenue 3. Ramona Boulevard & Downing Avenue 4. Ramona Boulevard & Badillo Street 5. Badillo Street & Puente Avenue 6. Maine Avenue & Palmrose Street 7. Maine Avenue & Clark Street 8. Maine Avenue & Los Angeles Street 9. Pacific Avenue & Bogart Avenue 10. Pacific Avenue & Downing Avenue 11. Pacific Avenue & Big Dalton Avenue 12. Ramona Boulevard & Cesaer Chavez Drive 13. Ramona Boulevard & Baldwin Park Boulevard 14. Ramona Boulevard & Stewart Avenue 15. Ramona Boulevard & Merced Avenue 16. Merced Avenue & Baldwin Park Boulevard 2.3 Existing Intersection Conditions �Volunies New traffic counts were conducted for all of the analyzed intersections for both AM and PM peak periods (between 7:00am and 9:00am and between 4:00pm and 6:00pm) in October of 2014. The existing peak hour traffic volumes are illustrated in Figures 2.3 and 2.4 for the AM and PM peak hours respectively (highest volume hours within the peak periods). The AM peak hour in the area is generally between 7:1 Sam and 8:15am, and the PM peak hour is generally between 5:00pm and 6:00pm. Levet of S vice Methodolo Y Level of service (LOS) is a qualitative measure used to describe the condition of traffic flow, ranging from excellent conditions at LOS A to overloaded conditions at LOS F, with each level defined by a range of volume/capacity (V/C) ratios. Table 2.1 defines the ranges of V/C ratios and their corresponding levels of service for signalized intersections. Intersection Level of Service was analyzed at the signalized intersections using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method (the City's standard methodology). The ICU method compares the peak hour volume of traffic at an intersection to the traffic volume the intersection is able to carry under ideal conditions (the capacity), and defines a volume to capacity (V/C) ratio for the intersection as a whole, which is then related to level of service. ]'he Mobility Group February 20, 2015 Z - 0 v 9 1 �2 JIL. N J1L N o .11� J1L o +Sm, ta L J L cm T ��irr ��irr m� �N Ave. Walnut 91. D a E 7 m z E U C O C N > 0 o y E Z W ;(D J N O O N In Ln p 7 N O a ( c c . x i �umiO ..��� �IIaG�i �. m 1 m 1 L., JI JALCM N r I L tmo m L uy P` �� m —• r 7 m N m m U3. � 1 'v sir sir Mfr ir s10 1 N JL *j t® Iaan T d' M1 & N 01- T ~®W MfrM It N k m p� N < t1i O.. N. f I IWGYII, wgGnAk'NM4.°M I(.. ^� L,� sir r Mfr m N m b a� ^ b w J tJ oir co o Ln O'` m� �N Ave. Walnut 91. D a E 7 m z E U C O C N > 0 o y E Z W ;(D J N O O N In Ln p 7 N O a ( c c . x i �umiO `c3vm �IIaG�i V)wW 1 m j 1� N Y l L N r I L tmo m uy P` sir sir Mfr ir s10 j C l0 = a CL m CL a m � 3 E r 7 C 0 O o Y CL cm � 5 3 ll W m CO- aJ&1dA11L)(Lrk_& "Jwtmwron &Lejo k -6-a-1 In, - -1 9, 1 Table 2.1 Level of Service Definitions for Signalized Intersections . . ..... Level Volume to of Description Capacity Service Ratio A Excellent operation. All approaches to the intersection appear quite <0.600 open, turning movements are easily made, and nearly all drivers find freedom of operation. B 'Very good operation. Many drivers begin to feet somewhat 0.601— 0.700 restricted within platoons of vehicles. This, represents stable flow. An approach to an intersection may occasionally be fully utilized and traffic queues start to form. C Good operation, Occasionally drivers may have to wait for more , 0.701— 0.800 than 60 seconds, and backups may develop behind turning vehicles. Most drivers feel somewhat restricted. D lair operation. Cars are sometinics required to wait for more than 0.801— 0.900 60 seconds during short peaks. There is no long-standing traffic queues. This level is typically associated witli design practice for peak periods. E Poor operation, Some long-standing vehicular queues develop on 0.901-1.000 critical approaches to intersections. Delays may be up to several minutes. F Forced flow. Represents jammed conditions. Backups from Over 1.001 locations downstream or on the cross street may restrict or prevent movement of vehicles out of the intersections approach lanes; therefore, volumes carried are not predictable. Potential for stop - and -go type traffic flow. Source: Highway Washington, D.C., 1982. Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, 1985 and Interim Materials on Highway Capacity, MCHRP Circular 212, The Mobility Group 11 February 20, 2015 r rllr_ cry° letaza a r 1 "i� , rx 1 � The unsignalized intersections were evaluated following the methodology for analyzing unsignalized intersections as defined in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board, HCM 2000). In contrast to signalized intersections, where all approaches to the intersection must stop at a red light and wait for the next green light, at stop -controlled intersections only the minor street traffic controlled by the stop sign is required to stop (at two-way stop intersections). Through traffic movements on the major street do not stop, and turning movements 1'rotn the major street must stop only if there is conflicting traffic approaching; in the opposite direction. At all -way stop intersections, all approaches have to stop. Table 2-2 illustrates the level of service definitions for unsignalized intersections. Table 2.2 Level Of Service Definitions For Unsignalized Intersections Source: Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacily Manual, HCM 2000, 2000, Existin Pcak,, I -lour levels of Service Table 2.3 summarizes the existing AM and PM peak hour V/C ratios and corresponding levels of service at the analyzed intersections. These are also shown graphically in Figure 2.5. AMPeak Hour All of the studied intersections currently operate at LOS B or better during the AM peak hour except for the unsignalized intersection of Pacific Avenue & Bogart Avenue, which operates at LOS C. PMPeak Hour All of the studied intersections currently operate at LOS D or better during the PM peak hour except for the unsignalized intersection of Pacific Avenue & Bogart Avenue, which operates at LOS E. The Mobility Group 12 February 20, 2015 Average Control Level of Service Delay (seconds/veh� A 0 to 10 B >10 to 15 C >15 to 25 D >25 to 35 E >35 to 50 F > 50 Source: Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacily Manual, HCM 2000, 2000, Existin Pcak,, I -lour levels of Service Table 2.3 summarizes the existing AM and PM peak hour V/C ratios and corresponding levels of service at the analyzed intersections. These are also shown graphically in Figure 2.5. AMPeak Hour All of the studied intersections currently operate at LOS B or better during the AM peak hour except for the unsignalized intersection of Pacific Avenue & Bogart Avenue, which operates at LOS C. PMPeak Hour All of the studied intersections currently operate at LOS D or better during the PM peak hour except for the unsignalized intersection of Pacific Avenue & Bogart Avenue, which operates at LOS E. The Mobility Group 12 February 20, 2015 Table 2.3 Existing Conditions - Intersection Level of Service No. Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour V/C or LOS V/C or LOS (Delay) (Delay) 1 Ramona Boulevard & Maine Avenue 0.671 B 0.853 D 2 1 Ramona Boulevard & Bogart Avenue 0.508 A 0.574 A 3 Ramona Boulevard & Downing Avenue 0.556 A 0.548 A 4 Ramona Boulevard & Badillo Street 0.649 B 0.574 A 5 Badillo Street & Puente Avenue 0.597 A 0.666 B 6 Maine Avenue & Palmrose Street 0.360 A 0.382 A 7 Maine Avenue & Clark Street 0.560 A 0.551 A 8 Maine Avenue & Los Angeles Street 0.662 B 0.712 C 9 Pacific Avenue & Bogart Avenue' (20.4) C (36.0) E 10 Pacific Avenue & Downing Avenue 0.472 A 0.508 A 11 Pacific Avenue & Big Dalton Avenue 0.535 A 0.577 A 12 Ramona Boulevard & Cesar Chavez Drive 0.424 A 0.539 A 13 Ramona Boulevard & Baldwin Park Boulevard 0.555 A 0.784 C 14 Ramona Boulevard & Stewart Avenue 0.561 A 0.596 A 15 Ramona Boulevard & Merced Avenue 0.648 B 0.624 B 16 Merced Avenue & Baldwin Park Boulevard 0.595 A 0.684 1 B Note: 1. Unsignalized intersection. c m Z v 0) U) u o N 3 J 0 C C: 3 O N � L +�+ m a nj C_ LLN m '"r"t cr "r 2.4 Existing Transit Service The Specific Plan area is served by a total of six transit routes, of which one is a Metro bus route, three are Foothill Transit routes, and two are Baldwin Parking Transit routes (the local Baldwin Park service). All of these routes have stops close to or nearby the Baldwin Park Metrolink station. Figure 2.6 and 2.7 shows the existing transit services in the Specific Plan area. The Specific Plan area is also served by the Baldwin Park Metrolink Station. Metrolink The Baldwin Park Station is served by the Metro San Bernardino Line, which runs between Downtown Los Angeles and San Bernardino. The San Bernardino Line operates between approximately 4:00am and 12:30am, and until about 1:00am on weekend nights. It operates around every 16-25 minutes during weekday peak periods and at about 60 minutes on weekends. Some express trains pass through this station but do not stop. 'Metro Buses Metro Local 190/194 runs between Cal Poly Pomona and El Monte Metrolink station, and runs along Ramona Boulevard through the Specific Plan area. It operates at about 10-25 minute headways during weekday peak periods and at 20-60 minute headways on weekends. Fooihill Trans l_T uses Foothill Transit 178 runs between Puente Hills Mall and El Monte Metrolink station. It runs along Baldwin Park Boulevard and Ramona Boulevard between Baldwin Park Boulevard and Downing Avenue. Foothill Transit 178 has a stop next to the Baldwin Park Metrolink station. It operates at about 10-25 minute headways during weekday peak periods and at 20-60 minute headways on weekends. Foothill Transit 272 runs between Duarte and West Covina. It runs along Baldwin Park Boulevard and Ramona Boulevard between Baldwin Park Boulevard and Downing Avenue, Foothill Transit 272 has a stop next to the Baldwin Park Metrolink station. It operates at about 10-25 minute headways during weekday peak periods and at 20-60 minute headways on weekends. Foothill Transit 274 runs between the Baldwin Park Metrolink station and Whittier. It runs along Pacific Avenue and Ramona Boulevard between Maine Avenue and Downing Avenue. Foothill Transit 274 has a stop next to the Baldwin Park Metrolink station. It operates at about 10-25 minute headways during weekday peak periods and at 20-60 minute headways on weekends. The Mobility Group 15 February 20, 2015 E m c m IL u LLwi m r -,,/-Pt _ _ D(OL-t 1'lie Baldwin Park "T'ransi't Shuttle The Baldwin Park Transit shuttle is a circulator bus that provides access to various points in Baldwin Park. It runs Mondays - Fridays from 6:00am to 7:00pm, on Saturdays from 8:00am to 5:00pm, and on Sundays from 9:00am to 4:00pm. The service is operated with approximately 27 -minute headways on weekdays and around 35 -minute headways on weekends, with an 80 -cent one-way fare. There are currently two routes: the regular route and the special route. The special route is identical to the regular routes except that it takes shortcuts on Frazier Street, Center Street and Olive Street. In the Specific Plan area, these two routes are exactly same, as shown in Figure 2.7. There are currently two lines on both regular and special routes: the Teal Line and the Pumpkin Line. The Teal line runs counter -clock wise and the Pumpkin line runs clock wise. Some major locations served on the routes within the Specific Plan area are Ramona Boulevard, the Metrolink Station, Morgan Park, and Maine Park Plaza. �_._._-_._ The Mobility Group 18 February 20, 2015 3. Future Conditions Without The Project 3.1 Traffic Forecasts In order to evaluate the potential traffic impacts of the proposed project, it was necessary to first estimate and analyze future traffic conditions without the project. The year selected for this analysis was 2035, which is the Specific Plan horizon year. Because of the long-term horizon for the Specific Plan, future traffic forecasts were estimated primarily based on regional traffic forecasts. This approach assured consistency with the regional planning process. The source was the traffic growth forecast from the Los Angeles Congestion Management Plan, which projects an average 0.4% per annum traffic growth over the next twenty-one years for the part of Los Angeles County in which Baldwin Park is located. This represents a growth in traffic of 9% to the year 2035. Existing traffic volumes were thus increased by this 9% growth factor to obtain background 2035 traffic forecasts in the study area. In general, these forecasts include all projected land use growth and transportation improvements in the region to 2035. However, there are specific currently known projects planned in the local Baldwin Park area that will affect local traffic volumes. A list of proposed development projects that are in construction, approved, or under formal planning consideration that could affect traffic conditions in the Project Area was prepared based on information obtained from a variety of sources including the City of Baldwin Park, and the adjacent cities of Irwindale, El Monte, West Covina, and unincorportaed areas of Los Angeles County . Following this review a total of 18 projects were identified, as listed in Table 3. 1, and their locations shown in Figure 3.1. These projects would generate a total of 2,670 vehicle trips in the A.M. peak hour and 5,542 trips in the P.M. peak hour. While the traffic from these projects could be considered to be included in the regional traffic forecasts, in order to prepare a conservative analysis and take into account the specific effects of these projects on the local roadway system, they were included in the analysis. It should also be noted that, for purposes of preparing a conservative worst case analysis, no potential street improvements or transportation mitigation measures that might be associated with any of the related projects were included in the future conditions traffic analysis. Trip generation estimates for the related projects were prepared, as shown in Table 3.1. These were generally taken from the environmental and/or traffic studies prepared for the individual projects. Where the information was not available from previous reports, the trip generation The Mobility Group 19 February 20, 2015 C b IL v u a) CL U) U 3 c 0 0 ca c U 3 9 Ad Y m 0. M OR _rn a) mLL Of m I ir 9", 50 up n aq tj hi EF II ho rn C C c 0 X X b 0 0 I PL CY. . . . . . .................... O N 41,AS ¢-P. -A b. Ei I SIOZ `OZ Leruga,d ZZ dno.[D ,14tjtgoW agjL •g ao V SO7 it, alunado pinom Xu,uz pue `anoq Nt,ad WV ag1 Butanp aallaq ao D SO -1 ju alt,aado pjnom suoilomnjut potpnis 11v dnoH -Ibad LILY' •aotnaos Jo sjanaj asag1 SOJUJIsnljt t,•£ ann2t,d -suoilipuoa Sutlswo o} uostat,dutoo le saptnond osl, put, `suotltpuoo loafoad InogJtm 3an4nd ag1 aoJ pajlejnoj,o 331AJOS JO slaAaj uolloosaalui oql sortaleututns £ • £ pule Z' £ aigt,.L aatn.t S J.c a a° l t c t a asx j a d o ) t i suoi;ipuoa uoijamajui aaning £'£ •sasXlt,ule neoX aaninj noj )lnomlau uotlt,podsue4 asuq atjj ut pauxnsst, suns Iuautanoadutt stgl anuand Inl3og puu anuand ogtoud jo uolloosaalut agI }t, lleats otdjleal nmou t, jo uoi}t,ljv1sut oill si ut,-Il ogloodS oqj jo aleaX uotlaldwoo oqj of aotad an000 of popund Xllnj puu panoaddt, st I,gl vain luool agl ut Juautanoadutt utalsXs uoti,ltodsuleai Aluo agZ S;uauiano.idtuj uwalsSS uoi;vjjodsuTg i jL asug ojnln, Z'£ -Xjantjoadsaa smoq 3pod y id puu yjV aqj aoj £•£ puu Z• £ somOi j ut pal,aisnjlt on, saurttlon oUjt,al mog 3pad joafoad Inogltm aanIn3 oqj suot�tpuoo loofoad Inogptm omInA oql 2utTuasaadaa `spotaad juad Wj put, yjV aqj gloq aoj `S£OZ ut ,aa, Apn4s oqj ut suotltpuoo 3!jj,4 aanlrtd jo sIseoanoj aptnoad ol (aatlauo pagtnosop) gvaoa2 ogyil juatquzu put, sarunlon 2uustxa tp!m poutquxoo put, 31aomiou �-empuoa oqj of popple uogl woo j • £ olgt,s ut umogs sai,urtlsa dtaJ aql j oljju.U, aminj •suotjoasaajut Xpnjs oqj osnan,nl pue lean, Apnis aqj gOnoagl lanua; pinom sdtai osogj jo llu jou j,qj `sloafoad asaq} jo uotingraIsip otgd,n2oa2 oRml oqj do osnt,oaq wqj palou oq pinogs 11 •moq 31,ad yid oqj ut sdtal ajotgan ZbS`S inoq, pu, nnoq Vad WV aql ut sdtaj alotgan OL9`Z jnog,do lleiol, ajuaaua'B pinom sloafoad pajlelaa oqj `j'£ olq,Z ur umogs sV uzalsAs leo gulnaato pule kempt,oa unmoluemop aqi puu, `uotluool sjt `joafond oqj jo odAl aqj do Sutput,lsaapun ut, uo pasuq pajt,utqsa a-iom ao ojgujt,nu aaagnn satpnis snotnaad woaj uo7l oslu woo saluutt�so uotingralstp dta� `fIat,ltmtS '(L-[0,7`sraauz�uy uot1vidodsur7 l fo ainlysuj) not;tpg ,�,6 — uOlIMMOD dt q ut sa�,a dtai Sutsn pal,uttlsa s,nn Ci7t` M 1 ,1 �.� M i g ,"�'"V ;, IG a'{ dtCJ'.®e�.. SIOZ `OZ bi3njga3 £Z dnOJD Atligoyq olgjL 'a SO'I 1v olluado pinom wql (anuany oumw ?8 p,renainog mourn -d) uoposaalui ouo jo uotldooxo aqj ql!m `anoq 3Wad yid oqj Sui np aaj4aq ao Q SOZ lie altuodo pinom suopoosaalu[ palpn4s iI`v' dnoH Tad Nd I I L m m c o cn > > m m c � K m 3 co 0 Z < m v o � c � co Z 3 c m OV W O r yA Cn O l O OI N J L JIL J J - 1 p P t A A � l.� l� t 10 �7ir CDr 1 N I,- ®� A J V O Iir� A"a O� .+ im N INn m� �J1LL r � w Wm a8 *Mk O A J I L �w v a L w •— �„ x O " "". 'mnyaarJr�rapN6' wi 8 8 � 1 r IPV N 'Jl d� �. Cn wfJi1 N J �JILC CA �7irpr 10 �7ir CDr I,- ®� A J V O m N o. A"a O� .+ suogipuoo loafozd lnogliM ainin3 ui uoposlalui paziluu8is !suotlipuoo 2uilsixui uoiloasialui Pam Lu3isu fl • Ig 11 £99'0 d 969'0 PIunalnog )Ixud uintplug V anuaAd paozaW 91 O 90L'0 g 8b9'0 anuaAV paoaaW ag pzunalnog suouzug 91 g 909'0 b 199'0 anuaAd pumols 2p pxunalnog suoure2I bi v 009'0 v 999'0 pzunalnog Spud uinnplug ?g paunalnog motuma £I N 19b'0 d J7Zti'0 aAua zanugD nsa0 ag pJunalnog motund z d 189'0 d 9£9'0 anuaAV uollva Zig ag anuaAd oi31oud N 0I9'0 d ZLV'O onuaAV Suiumoa ag anuaAd agioud Oi v £ 17'0 a (b'OZ) anuaAd pugog V anuaAV ogioud 6 Z99 `0 laazls salafuV sol ag anuaAd 'auisW 8 El L09'0 v 099'0 laaxlS 31ju1D W anuany ouieW L d 06£'0 v 09£'0 laauS asojwlud ag anuaAd auisyq g g bti9'0 `v' L69'0 anuaAd aluand V laa.4S ollipug 9 D 90L'O g 6b9'0 laa-us 0111Pug V piunalnog nuouznd p `d 009'0 d 999'0 onuaAV iiuiueno(j V plunalnog suouiu'l £ d 099'0 v 809'0 anuaAd pL,2og ag piunalnog suouind Z Z£L'O S IL9'0 I anuaAd ouiuW 7g piunalnog suoumg I uaQ ) � I soli D/A s0'I JO D/A suoilipuoo loofoid lnogliM ainlnd suoilipuo0 Ouilsixg uoiloastaluI ON anoll NVad IAIV - 331AJOS;o lana'I uollaasaalul suoipuoa;aafold }noqj1M aanln3 Z'£ algg.L •suoilipu00103rozd Inog3iM ainina ui uOiloasialui POMFugis °suotl!PuoO 2uilsixg ui uoiloasxalui pazilnuBisufl ' I :atom anon 3Ivad wd - aawaS 30 lanaZ uol;aasdajuI suo. !puoj pafoad jnoyjiM aan;nA £•£ alQg.L S9L'0 g 189'0 PJunalnog pijud uimplug V anuany PD;L �i 91 089'0 g 17Z9'0 anuand pao.Taybi V pinnalnog uuoiumd Si II 9179'0 v 969'0 anuand 1pemalS ag p.Iunalnog uuoum-a 17I 0 L98'0 3 178L'0 p.unalnog xjud uimpleg 29 paunalnog uuouma £i 689'0 d 6£9'0 anuQ zanng3 aesaD V pzunalnog uuoaxe21 Zi g 17£9'0 b LL9'0 anuand uollua dig V anuany OUIOud I I v 855'0 `d 809'0 anuand SutumoQ V anuand oUpled 01 915 '0 g i0'901 anuand pugog W anuand ogloud 6 6LL'0 Q ZiL'0 laazlS salaud sol 2y anuand ouiuw 8 g 1709 0 d 199'0 as z u anuan ouiu l -�S � i� �S d y�i L LZ17'0 d Z8£'0 laailS asonulud V anuand auiuy� 9 iZL'0 g 999'0 O i n a anuand alua d 28 l ai 1S ii.PE g S g ZZ9'0 d 17L9'0 laazlS oiiipBg V piunalnog uumird 17 1769'0 d 8179'0 anuand BuiumoCl a8 p.renalnog uuou ma £ £f 5Z9'0 d tLS'0 onuany In2og 78 paunalnog uuouiuN Z SS6'0 Q £98'0 anuand auiuW 2g pmalnog uuouima I (AuiaQ) Soy yin S+lI JO Din suoilipuOD loafo�d lnogliM ainlnd suoiltpuoa uilsi Z�l uoilooszalul .0m anon 3Ivad wd - aawaS 30 lanaZ uol;aasdajuI suo. !puoj pafoad jnoyjiM aan;nA £•£ alQg.L E CD U) co a _-r O 7 r CD co En O h CD z 0' CD 00 .C --i& o "y (11r NI' Pqr r 4r � rt,f Id"1' _. _ ........— .....� 4. Future With Project Conditions This section of the report describes the transportation characteristics of the proposed project (the Specific Plan) and documents the analysis of potential project traffic impacts in the study area. 4.1 Project Transportation Characteristics 4.1.1 Transportation Systems The following discussion summarizes the key provisions of the City of Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan with respect to transportation. Full details are provided in Chapter 6 of the Specific Plan document. The Plan takes advantage of the central location of the Metrolink Station and emphasizes a multimodal approach to circulation — to afford convenient access to and circulation within the area for all transportation modes. Consistent with the City's policies for Complete Streetst, the Plan is intended to provide not only effective auto circulation, but also choices and opportunities for effective and convenient transit, pedestrian, and bicycle circulation. The Specific Plan therefore provides for a balance between all transportation modes in the Downtown. The existing street system provides the basis for circulation by all modes, and will be maintained in its current configuration, with some minor changes designed to improve access, circulation, and walkability. Key access corridors to Downtown will continue to be Ramona Boulevard, Baldwin Park Boulevard, and Pacific Avenue. Key circulation streets within Downtown will continue to be Maine Avenue, Clark Street, Palm Avenue, Palmrose Street, Bogart Avenue, and Downing Avenue. The Specific Plan envisions both Ramona Boulevard and Maine Avenue as Downtown Boulevards. These two streets will function as the Complete Streets spines of the Downtown. The Specific Plan identifies improvements intended to create a Grand Pedestrian boulevard along Ramona Boulevard in Downtown, which is intended to function as the Complete Street spine to the Downtown. The existing street width and number of traffic lanes will be retained. However the adjacent public right-of-way areas containing diagonal parking (the parking bays) will be reconfigured. One row of diagonal parking (closest to the street) will be removed, and the sidewalks widened. The row of diagonal parking adjacent to the buildings I The City's Complete Streets policy establishes guiding principles and practices so transportation improvements are planned, designed, constructed, operated, and maintained to encourage walking, bicycling, and transit use while promoting safe operations for all users. Mobility Groep 29 February 20, 2015 "tea of Balthvin'cork Downtown � will be retained. This will create a wider and generous landscaped pedestrian way adjacent to the buildings while retaining convenient parking located next to the commercial land uses'. This will allow the creation of a grand pedestrian boulevard along the length of Ramona Boulevard. The roadway classifications, the number of traffic lanes and the roadway lane configurations of streets will remain the same as today, with two exceptions. The section of Maine Avenue between Pacific Avenue and Sterling Way (opposite City Hall), will be vacated. Sterling Way will be realigned eastward at Ramona Boulevard from the current unsignalized tee -intersection to a four way signalized intersection with Cesar Chavez Drive. (The existing intersection of Ramona Boulevard & Cesar Chavez Drive is already signalized). These changes, shown in Figure 4.1, will simplify the local circulation in this area, and will allow the creation of an area west of City Hall for a new civic plaza and a potential development site. Access to all existing properties in the area will be maintained, including the provision of a new street to run at the rear of the commercial uses fronting on Ramona Boulevard between Maine Avenue and Sterling Way in order to maintain local access and deliveries. These changes will enhance pedestrian circulation in this area and simplify the currently complicated "double" intersection of Sterling Way and Cesar Chavez Drive into a single consolidated intersection. Transit Metrolink service will continue to operate service through the Specific Plan area, and the Metrolink Station will continue in operation at it current location. Regional bus transit routes will continue to serve the Specific Plan area, as well as serving the Metrolink Station directly. The Specific Plan will encourage and enhance accessibility to local and regional public transportation by improving connectivity to the Baldwin Park Metrolink Station and other public transit providers, and adding pedestrian and transit amenities. The Specific Plan Bicycle Network includes a combination of Class II and Class III facilities to provide a connected and integrated bicycle network in the downtown, and to connect downtown to the adjacent neighborhoods. 1 Approximately 150 parking spaces would be removed from Ramona Boulevard. As explained in the Specific Plan these would be accommodated elsewhere in the Specific Plan Area. The Specific Plan also identifies a potential new parking structure on Laurens Avenue. A structure of approximately 250 spaces was assumed at this location for analysis purposes, and it was assumed the removed Ramona spaces would be accommodated in the new structure. The Mobility Group 30 February 20, 2015 § a 2 OLV__oL&sJ_(L1n11_PA11P6 -A g LR A Class II bicycle lane consists of a designated striped lane along the curb lane of a street or highway. The lane provides for one-way travel and is generally delineated with special striping and signage. A Class III bicycle route is for shared use with pedestrians or more commonly motor vehicle traffic. Signs are posted which indicate that the road also serves as a bike route. While no special striping is provided for cyclists, there may be "sharrow" markings (representation of a bicycle) on the roadway to emphasize the shared use of the roadway lane. The Specific Plan identities Class II facilities where feasible. However, on -street parking is also an important asset to the function and economic well-being of downtown, so where there is insufficient roadway width to stripe bicycle lanes and to retain on -street parking, a connected network is achieved through the designation of Class III Bike Streets. The General Plan calls for Class II bicycle lanes on Ramona Boulevard and Baldwin Park Boulevard north of Ramona Boulevard, and Class III bicycle routes on Baldwin Park Boulevard south of Ramona Boulevard, Sterling Way, and Pacific Avenue. These are all retained in the Specific Plan. The existing bike lane on Ramona Boulevard will be maintained and improved. The roadway will be restriped to retain the exiting two traffic lanes in each direction, but will be reconfigured to provide a wider bicycle lane (6' compared to the existing 4' lanes), the bicycle lane will be colored to,provide greater visibility] and a®6' striped separation to the moving traffic lanes will be added. These r ilieatloons will enhance bicycle safety. Bicycle Routes will be established on the following streets in the Specific Plan area: Baldwin Park Boulevard south of Ramona Boulevard, Sterling Way, and Pacific Avenue south of Maine Avenue (all as specified in the General Plan), as well as on Maine Avenue, Bogart Avenue, Downing Avenue south of Ramona Boulevard, and Central Avenue. The provision of these bicycle facilities will not reduce the number of traffic lanes on any of the roadways in Downtown. 4.1.2 Land Uses For the purposes of the EIR traffic analysis, land use forecasts were developed for the Specific Plan. These comprised land use types and quantities that could be added in the Specific Plan area and land use types and quantities that could be replaced (removed). A total of twenty geographic zones were identified and land use projections made for each zone. The land use forecasts are summarized in Table 4. 1, by type of land use, and for the Specific Plan area as a whole. The Mobility Group 32 February 20, 2015 Table 4.1. Baldwin Park Downtown Specific Plan - Land Use Summary Land Use Units Existing Future I Net Change Residential -Apartments DU 42 890 848 Single Family Residential DU 59 42 -17 Public Facility sf 910 910 0 Community Center sf 55,173 55,173 0 Communication Facilities sf 38,066 38,066 0 Industrial isf 33,644 1 44,363 10,719 Manufacturing sf 23,740 0 -23,740 Medical Office sf 11,910 0 -11,910 Auto Repair sf 10,701 0 -10,701 Office sf 46,897 67,931 21,034 Government Office sf 78,952 57,136 -21,816 Retail/Commercial sf 576,545 853,369 276,824 Restaurant sf 10,000 58,728 48,728 Totals Residential (DU's) 101 932 831 Non -Residential s 886,538 1,175,676 289,138 CO,plow ldi pirr Pyr r w � ' t"�t� �:t�e `" �++1 t t� ..... ...... The land use changes in the Specific Plan area would be mixed uses, consistent with the downtown environment and a transit oriented district around the rail station. In total the Specific Plan could accommodate approximately an additional 289,150 sq. ft. of commercial development and an additional 848 multi -family dwelling units. A total of 68,200 sq. ft. of commercial and industrial uses could be removed in the Specific Plan area (including almost 24,000 sq. ft. of manufacturing uses) as well as 17 single family dwelling units. 4.1.3 Project Trip Generation and Distribution Vehicular trip generation was estimated for the existing land uses and for the projected future land uses, to determine a net increase in trip generation. Trip generation from the project was estimated using trip rates from Trip Generation Manual — 9`h Edition (Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2012). As described above, for purposes of traffic analysis, the Specific Plan area was divided into 20 geographic zones where redevelopment could occur. Potential changes in land uses were identified for 15 of these zones. However, ITE trip rates are for stand-alone land uses with negligible transit use. They were thus adjusted to be more representative of a local downtown environment and transit oriented district — where the proximity of land uses allows for some trips to be made by walking rather than driving, where some of the trips are between destinations within the downtown and thus do not leave the area; and where proximity to transit allows other i s to be made by tra sit. Internal Trip Reduction (Trips Remaining within the Specific Plan Boundary) Due to the mixed use nature of the Specific Plan land uses and the pedestrian -friendly small - block grid system layout, there would be interaction between the different land uses in the Specific Plan. For example, residents or employees living and/or working within the plan boundaries who visit a nearby retail or restaurant use would generally be within walking distance, and would not need to make a vehicle trip. Similarly, some visitors to downtown would visit several destinations and would not make separate driving trips to each use but would typically walk between nearby destinations. Transit Trips Because of the Specific Plan location mostly in a traditional downtown grid combined with a host of land uses within walking distance from the Metrolink station and with some bus transit readily available, a number of project trips are expected to be made by transit rather than private vehicle. Adjustments _.. e Mobility Group 34 February 20, 2015 C&0 13q1c�'ta�_rLP_ar4ar �atla ..1? i'. Jai _.� __.. Certain adjustments to the trip generation rates were therefore made, in conjunction with City staff, to reflect the above conditions. These adjustments differed for existing and future conditions. Today, the land uses are lower density, and the downtown area is not very pedestrian friendly with a negligible amount of bicycling. In the future, with the Specific Plan, land use will be closer together and higher density — encouraging more walking between uses, and the pedestrian and bicycle oriented features of the Specific Plan will create a far more pedestrian friendly environment. In combination with the improved walking environment, the improved access to the Metrolink Station will encourage higher transit use. The location and combination of land uses in each zone was evaluated to estimate reasonable estimates of the proportion of trips internal to the Specific Area and that would be made by walking, and of mode shares for transit. For existing conditions, trip rate reductions of 5% for commercial uses, 10% for residential uses, and 20% for convenience uses such as banks and fast food were applied for internal and walking trips, and reduction of 2% for transit use. For future projections with the Specific Plan, trip rate reductions of between 10% and 20% were made for internal and walking trips, and between 5% and 10% for future transit use. The trip rates and adjustments used are shown in Table A-1 in Appendix A. These adjustments are based on consideration of local and national research' and are considered to be conservative adjustments (in order to provide a conservative (worst case) traffic analysis). The proportion of total Specific Plan trip generation made by transit and walking and/or remaining internal to the Specific Plan area could in fact be higher, given the transit service in the area, the mixed residential/employment land uses in the Specific Plan, and the existing downtown grid street system that is conducive to walk trips. However for purposes of preparing a conservative environmental analysis, the conservatively low figures identified above were used. Trip Generation Totals There are existing uses within several blocks of the Specific Plan that would be replaced with future development/redevelopment. The trip generation calculations account for these existing trips which would no longer occur with Specific Plan buildout. Estimates were made of existing trip generation from the site based on the type and quantity of the existing uses. These existing trips were subtracted from the new trips to be generated from the Project to obtain the net number of new trips that would be generated by buildout of the Specific Plan Update. As shown in Table 4.2, the Project would increase AM peak hour trips in the Specific Plan area from 1,611 to 1,943 trips, and would increase PM peak hour trips from 2,472 to 3,556 1 Trip Generation Handbook, An ITE Recommended Practice. Appendix C. Summary of Literature on Mixed - Use Developments, March 2001, Institute of Transportation Engineers. Mixing it Up. Jerry Walters and Reid Ewing, Urban Land, August 2008. Trip Generation handbook, An ITE Ilecommended Practice. Appendix B. Effect of Transportation Demand Mana enient anal Transit on Trip Generation, March 2001, Institute of Transportation. Engineers. TCRP Report 128. Effects of Transit Oriented Development on Rousing parking and Travel, Rescarch Findings. Transit Cooperative Research Program Final Draft August 1, 2008. The Mobility Group 35 February 20, 2015 Table 4.2. Trip Generation by Land Use Land Use its Existing Future Net Increment AM PM Daily AM PM Daily AM PM Daily Residential -Apartments DU 19 23 246 355 425 4,187 336 402 3,941 Single Family Residential DU 39 52 495 27 1 36 346 -12 -16 -149 Public Facility I sf 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Community Center sf 113 151 1,866 113 151 1,866 0 0 0 Communication Facilities sf 35 37 265 35 37 265 0 0 0 Industrial sf 30 32 1 229 1 37 39 278 7 7 49 Manufacturing sf 17 17 89 0 0 0 -17 -17 -89 Medical Office sf 25 38 379 0 0 0 -25 -38 -379 Auto Repair s f 3 s a 3 429 0 0 0 -35 I -43 -429 Office sf 72 68 508 95 90 675 23 22 167 Government Office sf 455 93 5,333 302 62 3,544 -153 -31 -1,789 Retail/Commercial sf 724 1,849 21,797 770 2,389 26,963 46 540 5,166 Restaurant sf 47 69 914 209 327 4,077 162 258 3,163 Total 1,611[2,472" 1,943 3,88642,201 3.32 1,084 9,651 Residential 58 382 461 4,533 324 386 '1, w Non -Residential 1,553 1 561 3 095 37 668 8 698 5 8543 Note. 1. Public facility sq ft are restrooms. No vehicle trips generated. %°i ea .N r "sv I Park w � r " _0 � S) , .1��.... I ar , I fik,�'. trips. The Project would therefore generate a net total of 332 new vehicle trips in the AM peak hour and 1,084 new hour vehicle trips in the PM peak hours. Trip Distribution The likely distribution of project trips was identified based on the type of land uses in the project, the likely origins and destinations of project residents and visitors, and the characteristics of the street system in the area of the project. The distribution estimates were based largely on trip distribution information in the Los Angeles Congestion Management Program for the area of Baldwin Park (which are based on the distribution of population and employment in the broader region), as well as consideration of the more localized areas adjacent to the Specific Plan area. Separate trip distribution estimates were made for non- residential trips and for residential trips. The distribution of peak hour vehicle trips from the Specific Plan Area is illustrated in Figure 4.2 for non-residential trips and in Figure 4.3 for residential trips. 4.2 Future Traffic Forecasts Traffic generated by the Project was added to the Future Without Project traffic volumes to obtain future traffic volumes with the Project for both peak periods at each of the study intersections. The total Future With Project conditions peak hour traffic volumes are illustrated in Figures 4.4 and 4.5 for the AM and PM peak hours. 4.3 Project Impacts i ri c ntt e t d The City of Baldwin Park has established threshold criteria that determine if a project has a significant impact at signalized intersections. Under the City's guidelines a project impact would be considered significant if the LOS for an intersection is LOS F and the project related increase in the V/C ratio is equal to or greater than 0.010. )MIR.1i Project Intersection level of Service The intersection level of service analysis for the Future With Project conditions is summarized in Table 4.3 for the AM peak hour and in Table 4.4 for the PM peak hour. These 1 Trip calculations are shown in Appendix A-2 and A-3„ The Mobility Group 37 February 20, 2015 q . § � E U F k § U) $ o \ � B k fL C14 $ � k k k lz / m 0 ti C m IL m CL c, m 0 N 3 v C o. F� Y M C C � � a� N u. w m J i L m N me- N kph N f`- m m Om0 t0 m a m JI JIL I Pl N Pl m � W I7 N O sirp ��{yyir ��r � �ippr ~ T lir N IN N n W �JIL 0 S Y Id N CL 2 n. y N E M 0 U l�tl F- a. � w LL LL JIL m JIL �a �m N m�1 Q�� � r�m sir smir W �1^^r lir r °sir � y h � r � 0 S Y Id N CL 2 n. y N E M 0 U l�tl F- a. � w LL LL Table 4.3 Future With Project Conditions Intersection Level of Service - AM Peak Hour No. Intersection Future Without Future With V/C Impact Project Conditions Project Conditions Increase V/C LOS V/C LOS I Ramona Boulevard & Maine Avenue 0.732 C 0.867 D 0.135 No 2 Ramona Boulevard & Bogart Avenue 0.550 A 0.565 A 0.015 No 3 Ramona Boulevard & Downing Avenue 0.600 A, 0.622 B 0.022 No 4 Ramona Boulevard & Badillo Street 0.706 C 0.731 C 0.025 No 5 Badillo Street & Puente Avenue 0.644 13 0.652 B 0.008 No 6 Maine Avenue & Palmrose Street 0.390 A 0.376 A -0.014 No 7 Maine Avenue & Clark Street 0.607 B 0.618 B 0.011 No 8 Maine Avenue & Los Angeles Street 0.717 C 0.724 C 0.007 No 9 Pacific Avenue & Bogart Avenue 0.443 A 0.460 A 0.017 No 10 Pacific Avenue & Downing Avenue 0.510 A 0.532 A 0.022 No 11 Pacific Avenue & Big Dalton Avenue . 0.581 A i 0.602 B 0.021 No 12 Ramona Boulevard & Cesar Chavez Drive 0.461 A 0.662 B 0.201 No 13 Ramona Boulevard & Baldwin Park Boulevard 0.600 A 0.651 B 0.051 No 14 Ramona Boulevard & Steward Avenue 0.606 B 0.625 B 0.019 No 15Ramona Boulevard & Merced Avenue 0.705 C 0.724 C 0.019 No 16 Merced Avenue & Baldwin Park Boulevard 0.663 B 0.677 B 0.014 No Table 4.4 Future With Project Conditions Intersection Level of Service - PM Peak Hour No. Intcisection Future Without Future With V/C Impact Project Conditions Project Conditions Increase V/C LOS V/C LOS 1 Ramona Boulevard &Mame Avenue 0.955 E 1.233 F 0.278 Yes 2 Ramona Boulevard & Bogart Avenue 0.625 B 0.684 B 0.059 No 3 Ramona Boulevard & Downing Avenue 0.594 A 0.647 B 0.053 No 4 l Street Ramona Boulevard& Badilo 0.622 B 0.721 C 0.099 No 5 Badillo Street & Puente Avenue 0.721 C 0.749 C 0.028 No 6 Maine Avenue & Palmrose Street 0.427 A 0.450 I A 0.023 No 7 1 Maine Avenue & Clark Street 0.604 B 0.626 B 0.022 No 8 Maine Avenue & Los Angeles Street 0.779 C 0.802 D 0.023 No 9 Pacific Avenue & Bogart Avenue 0.515 A 0.586 A 0.071 No 10 Pacific Avenue & Downing Avenue 0.558 A 0.589 A 0.031 No I 1 Pacific Avenue & Big Dalton Avenue 0.634 B 0.669 B 0.035 No 12 Ramona Boulevard & Cesar Chavez Drive 0.589 A 0.853 D 0.264 No 13 Ramona Boulevard & Baldwin Park Boulevard 0.867 D 1.036 F 0.169 Yes 14 Ramona Boulevard & Steward Avenue 0.646 B 0.681 B 0.035 No 15 Ramona Boulevard & Merced Avenue 0.680 B 0.717 C 0.037 No 16 Merced Avenue & Baldwin Park Boulevard 0.765 C 0.803 J D 0.038 No tables also compare the level of service for without Project and with Project conditions, show the increase in V/C ratios at each intersection due to the Project, and identify if the increase constitutes a significant impact. The future levels of service are also shown in Figure 4.6. AM Peak Hour The analysis summarized in Table 4.3 indicates that for the AM peak hour, the addition of Project traffic would cause the level of service to worsen at a number of locations, but remain at LOS D or better at all locations. Increases in volume/capacity (V/Q ratios would be less than the threshold for a significant impact to occur in all cases, so no significant impacts would occur in the AM peak hour. PM Peak Hour The analysis summarized in Table 4.4 indicates that for the PM peak hour, the addition of Project traffic would cause the level of service to worsen at a number of locations, but would remain at LOS D or better at most locations. The Project would result in a significant traffic impact at two intersections in the PM peak hour. These intersections are as follows (with the resultant LOS in parentheses): • Ramona Boulevard & Maine Avenue (LOS F) • Ramona Boulevard & Baldwin Park Boulevard (LOS F) Mitigation measures to address these impacts are addressed in Chapter 5 of this report. 4.4 CMP Analysis The Los Angeles County Congestion Management Program (CMP) requires that new development projects analyze potential project impacts on CMP monitoring locations, if an EIR is prepared for the Project. The CMP requires that the Traffic Study analyze traffic conditions at all CMP arterial monitoring intersections where the Proposed Project will add 50 or more trips during either the A.M. or P.M. weekday peak hours of adjacent street traffic. The CMP also requires that traffic studies analyze mainline freeway monitoring locations where the project will add 150 or more trips in either direction during either A.M. or P.M. weekday peak hours. If, based on these criteria, the Traffic Study. identifies no facilities for study, then no further traffic analysis is required. A review of the 2010 CMP indicated the following arterial monitoring stations that are closest vlebilz y Group — 45 February'20„ 2015 r rx�"�;Pra�'krNra�±'� C,r,c ier?l_ ,�� gra to the Project Site and where CMP impacts could potentially occur due to the Proposed Project. • Azusa Avenue & Foothill Boulevard • Azusa Avenue & Arrow Highway • Azusa Avenue & Cameron Avenue • Azusa Avenue & Amar Road The number of Proposed Project vehicle trips expected to pass through these intersections was estimated based on the Proposed Project trip generation and the Proposed Project trip distribution discussed previously in this chapter. Due to dispersal of Project traffic onto multiple routes and streets as it travels further from the Project, the actual number of trips may be less than the 50 trip threshold by the time Project traffic reaches many of those monitoring intersections. Based on the trip generation and trip distribution characteristics of the Project as described earlier, it is estimated that the maximum number of trips that the Project would add to these CMP arterial monitoring stations would be 22 trips at Azusa Avenue & Foothill Boulevard, 33 trips at Azusa Avenue & Arrow Highway, 43 trips at Azusa Avenue & Cameron Avenue, and 33 trips at Azusa Avenue & Amar Road, in the PM peak hour. As the thresholds of 50 or more trips would not be exceeded no further analysis is required, and there would be no significant CMP arterial impacts. QMP Freeway T 'tot, n , finli s A review of the 2010 CMP also indicated the following freeway monitoring stations that are closest to the Project Site. • I-10 east of Peck Road • I-10 east of Puente Street • 1-10 at Grand Avenue • I-210 west of I-605 • I-605 at San Gabriel River Bridge These segments are located some considerable distance from the Project Site. Nevertheless, the number of Project vehicle trips expected to pass through these stations was estimated based on the Project trip generation and trip distribution discussed earlier. The maximum number of one-way Project trips that would be added to these freeway segment monitoring locations would be in the PM peak hour with 55 trips on I-10 east of Peck Road, 50 trips on I- 10 at Grand Avenue, 30 trips on I-210 west of I-605, and zero trips on I-10 east of Puente Avenue and on I-605 at San Gabriel River Bridge. As these volumes are well below the CMP threshold of 150 trips, no further analysis is necessary and there would be no significant CMP freeway impacts. The Mobility Group 46 February 20, 2015 r�� ° wln-& % ryr icr�wmr i cif? cr i ° 1 f rr CMP TransitMD49 A1141 Ysis An analysis of potential Project impacts on the transit system was performed, per the CMP requirements and guidelines. The number of transit trips that would be generated by the Project is shown in Table 4.5 and was estimated based on the trip generation methodology described in Chapter 4. There would be approximately 186 net additional transit trips (101 inbound trips and 85 outbound trips) in the AM peak hour due to the Project, and approximately 365 additional transit trips (184 inbound and 181 outbound) in the PM peak hour. The highest number of additional transit trips would therefore occur in the PM peak hour. The peak capacity of the transit system serving the Project Site is shown in Table 4.6. Based on the existing service frequency of transit lines near the Project Site, the hourly directional capacity of the transit lines is 2,151 persons. The highest directional volume of peak hour trips added by the Project would be 184 trips in the PM peak hour, which would be about 8.5% of the total hourly directional transit capacity. It is concluded that the Project would not cause the capacity of the transit system to be substantially exceeded and therefore that the Project would not create any significant impacts on the transit systems serving the Project Area. 4.5 Existing With Project Impacts This section addresses an analysis of potential Project impacts for the Existing Conditions with Project scenario. Project traffic was added to existing conditions traffic and the potential for impacts evaluated. Exisd W" ,t rsection Level of Service The total Existing With Project conditions peak hour traffic volumes are illustrated in Figures 4.7 and 4.8 for the AM and PM peak hours. Tables 4.7 and 4.8 summarize the level of service for the Existing with Project conditions at the analyzed intersections for the AM and PM peak hours respectively. Figure 4.9 also shows the intersection levels of service. Pro' AM Peak Hour The analysis summarized in Table 4.7 indicates that for the AM peak hour, while the addition of Project traffic would worsen the level of service at some locations, all intersections would operate at LOS C or better, and that any increases in volume/capacity (V/Q ratios would be .� .._ ......... The Mobility Group 47 February 20, 2015 L a M N m N m N O f0 O O r O O O N N O O '., m O O M N N...m m r r r O O O O O r O O M W ro C y - V r m CL y a m M... m V OH 0 r M r r O O O N M O O co LO CL (0 r r N N M M LO N LO M r N m M CO r r p O O O N O O' toO N 00 m 0 r r O Q f0 r O fo c d) — r r (MY) a ¢ Y M f0 m m r N r r O O N v O O N co O M m O N Y No e o e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e o 0 0 Q 7 O O r r O r O O r r LO W) C-114 N N N O O N N O O = c a ro A M m 0 0 CE, 7 O O O O O M1c'i N N N N O O N N O Y,M ¢ Y ro mM O O f- 1- M 0) N fp O f� M M V m M m ,.d 0 w 10 f0 V W � CO f� d' N " m to m O1 M Omf .a 2= r 7 fry <t (D a. � N O O) r O O h r f0 N 0) N O m' N m CD a o Cl) fO d uV fr) Nm N m N m M V O CO rn fV J[tipp M MV o M M M M r M i V f00 W fro W M N 7 I7. O f00 M t00 N m M '... m r N a� S M a N N 7 CL N N � m 10. M M r V.....m m'..,. m M r. N> (A d O N O � M .-- N � � M U p M CO CO N m ar m z U C C fu W � m 0 V Er C C E m E E c 'm aci E c LL ro _ 0 o ma w E E U E 0 f9 - m V5 w o C v o o ani 2 n a 7 m ami o ani ayi Q c - C7 a y ¢ in g i Q C7 fn N r EE W C C CL .r m Q N m B FT E LL W E W O d dl 0 O_ jE r Q Q ro H E Q c O a N 0 Z V k co m V y V F -: z rn 0o 00 N 00 o 00 o o O r r N C-1 C14 u m o o O --' cry, ~ M a p 0 m VN 1 In In M M d M 3a w Ia ' � Qx� C ✓ y a o M M vN i C14tn kn k^ vNi L^ M M T� 41 4 N .'ti a p y �y N � � .�-� .�. N N �Y �s 3a o vi nIn In r r N N 3�x 0 o � b O O 3 x a4 Al Al U U s O N q q q q N C) N V) is Q% Fa N N N ,Y •.� a w b ')Zee, C 1� trra ffl. irz� �C 21 at al less than the threshold for a significant impact to occur. No significant impacts would occur in the AM peak hour. PM Peak Hour The analysis summarized in Table 4.8 indicates that for the PM peak hour, while the addition of Project traffic would worsen the level of service at some locations, all intersections would operate at LOS D or better, with three exceptions. One intersection, at Ramona Boulevard & Baldwin Park Boulevard, would operate at LOS E, and two intersections would operate at LOS F - at Ramona Boulevard & Maine Avenue, and at Pacific Avenue & Bogart Avenue. The level of service at the unsignalized intersection of Pacific Avenue & Bogart Avenue would change from LOS E to LOS F. The City does not have criteria for significant impacts at unsignalized intersections. However, the City has plans to install a new traffic signal at this location, which would result in LOS A. The Project would result in a significant traffic impact at one intersection in the PM peak hour, as follows (with the resultant LOS in parentheses): • Ramona Boulevard & Maine Avenue (LOS F) A mitigation measure to address this impact is addressed in. Chapter 5 of this report. rY 50 February 20, 2015 The Mobility Group m E CD Z E V C O � 7 Z O d a E W d F LU O J N O O � C U •U La E Q ( d N. �N tn0 ��1�'L �m n �J1L Ln c1�fr� o c9 v f m m N �JILt 7 O Y cd N n. a m 0 U ftl L_ m 3 1:14n �j rO o I �' �J1L- U-1 ��1�'� ��1�� ��1L `�--N m� �uI�r r� w,.. N N m M1 r �0 o m aO m o m b 7 O Y cd N n. a m 0 U ftl L_ m 3 1:14n �j rO o I Table 4.7 Existing With Project Conditions Intersection Level of Service - AM Peak Hour No. Intersection Existing Conditions Existing With V/C or Impact Project Conditions Delay V/C or LOS V/C or LOS Increase (Delay) (Delay) 1 Ramona Boulevard & Maine Avenue 0.671 B 0.792 C 0,121 No 2 Ramona Boulevard & Bogart Avenue 0.508 A 0.523 A 0.01.5 No 3 Ramona Boulevard & Downing Avenue 0.556 A i 0.577 A 0.021 No 4 Ramona Boulevard ,& Badillo Street 0.649 B, 0.675 B 0.026 No 5 Badillo Street & Puente Avenue 0.597 A 0.605 B 0.008 No 6 Maine Avenue & Palmrose Street 0.360 A 0.347 A -0.013 No 7 Maine Avenue & Clark Street 0.560 A 0.571 A 0.011 No 8 Maine Avenue & Los Angeles Street a O 662 B 0.669 B 0.007 No 9 Pacific Avenue & Bogart Avenue (20.4) C (23.9) C (3.5) N/A 10 Pacific Avenue & Downing Avenue 0.472 A 0.493 A 0.021 No 11 Pacific Avenue & Big Dalton Avenue 0.535 A 0.557 A 0.022 No 12 Ramona Boulevard & Cesar Chavez Drive 0.424 A 0.614 B 0.190 No 13 Ramona Boulevard & Baldwin Park Boulevard 0,555 A 0.593 A 0.038 No 14 Ramona Boulevard & Steward Avenue 0.561 A 0.579 A 0.018 No 15 Ramona Boulevard & Merced Avenue 0.648 B 0.667 B 0.019 No 16 Merced Avenue & Baldwin Park Boulevard 0.595 L A 0.615 L B 0.020 L No Note: 1. Unsignalized intersection in Existing conditions and Existing With Project conditions, Table 4.8 Existing With Project Conditions Intersection Level of Service - PM Peak Hour No. Intersection Existing Conditions Existing With V/C or Impact Project Conditions Delay V/C or LOS V/C or LOS Increase (Delay) (Delay) Y) Ramona Boulevard & Maine Avenue 0,853 D 1.117 F 0.264 Yes F21 Ramona Boulevard & Bogart Avenue 0.574 A 0.632 B 0.058 No 3 Ramona Boulevard & Downing Avenue 0.548 A 0.601 B 0.053 No 4 Ramona Boulevard & Badillo Street 0.574 A 0.667 B 0.093 No 5 Badillo Street & Puente Avenue 0.666 B 0.693 B 0.027 No 6 Maine Avenue & Palmrose Street 0.382 A 0.405 A 0.023 No 7 Maine Avenue & Clark Street 0.551 A 0.572 A 1 0.021 No 8. Maine Avenue & Los Angeles Street 0.712 C ' '0.734 C 0.022 No 9 Pacific Avenue & Bogart Avenue (36.0) E (101.5) F (65.5) N/A 10 Pacific Avenue & Downing Avenue 0.508 A 01539 A 0,031 No 11 Pacific Avenue &Big Dalton Avenue- - - 0.577 A 0.612 _ 1-1_ 0.035 No 12 Ramona Boulevard & Cesar Chavez Drive 0.539 A 0.785 C 0.246 No 13 Ramona Boulevard & Baldwin Park Boulevard 0.784 C 0.947 1'a 0.163 No 14 Ramona Boulevard & Steward Avenue 0.596 A 0.631 B 0.035 No 15 Ramona Boulevard & Merced Avenue 0.624 B 0.661 I3 0.037 No 16 Merced Avenue & Baldwin Park Boulevard 0.684 B 0.723 4 0.039 No Note: 1. Unsignalized intersection in Existing conditions and Existing With Project conditions. 0b a lr wryr oiv P2aaro� 5. Mitigation Measures This report section addresses the need for mitigation measures to address potential significant impacts from the Project. The preceding impact analysis identified that no significant impacts would occur in the AM peak hour. It also identified that significant traffic impacts would occur at the following two study intersections in the PM peak hour: • Ramona Boulevard & Maine Avenue • Ramona Boulevard & Baldwin Park Boulevard 1 sed rlit' ati Me99u The following mitigation measures are proposed. An analysis of the mitigation measures is shown in Table 5.1 for the PM peak hour. Ramona Boulevard & Maine Avenue The project wo11 uld c.reate a s - i . gnificant traffic impact iii ,e PM peak. hour, changing the V/C and LOS from 0.955 and LOS E to 1.233 and LOS F. The proposed mitigation measure at this intersection would be to add roadway capacity and restripe the eastbound and westbound approaches on Ramona Boulevard to add dedicated right -turn lanes (a more efficient use of the roadway space, which would not result in any lane widths of less than 11 feet). This measure could be accomplished within the existing curb to curb width of the roadways, and all other lane configurations at the intersection would remain the same as today. On the Ramona Boulevard approaches to the intersection it would replace the bike lane configuration proposed in the Specific Plan for the length of the right turn lane. As shown in Table 5.1, this measure would reduce but not eliminate the significant impact. The result would be a V/C of 1.089 and LOS F. An additional mitigation measure would be to reduce the volume of traffic at the intersection, by not fully closing Maine Avenue between Pacific Avenue & Sterling Way as proposed in the Specific Plan, but instead to close only the eastbound direction and retain the westbound direction. This would be achieved by the relocation of Maine Avenue between Pacific Avenue and Sterling Way to the north to run at the rear of the commercial uses fronting on Ramona Boulevard. This roadway section would operate as one way westbound only (allowing a narrower roadway cross section), while retaining rear access to the properties on The Mobility Group 56 February 20, 2015 "ic 1'r ?. i t Ramona Boulevard. As also shown in Table 5. 1, this would result in a V/C of 0.981 and LOS E and would fully mitigate the impact at this location. Ramona Boulevard & Baldwin Park Boulevard The project would create a significant traffic impact in the PM peak hour, changing the V/C and LOS from 0.867and LOS D to 1.036 and LOS F. The proposed mitigation measure at this intersection would be to add roadway capacity and restripe the eastbound and westbound approaches on Ramona Boulevard to add dedicated right -turn lanes. This measure could be accomplished within the existing curb to curb width of the roadways, and all other lane configurations at the intersection would remain the same as today. On the Ramona Boulevard approaches to the intersection it would replace the bike lane configuration proposed in the Specific Plan for the length of the right turn lane. As shown in Table 5. 1, this measure would reduce but not eliminate the significant impact. The result would be a V/C of 1.020 and LOS F. An additional mitigation measure would be to reduce the volume of traffic at the intersection, by not fully closing Maine Avenue between Pacific Avenue & Sterling Way as proposed in the Specific Plan, but instead to close only the eastbound direction and retain the westbound direction. This would be achieved by the relocation of Maine Avenue between Pacific Avenue and Sterling Way to the north to run at the rear of the commercial uses fronting on Ramona Boulevard. This roadway section would operate as one way westbound only (allowing a narrower roadway cross section), while retaining rear access to the properties on Ramona Boulevard. As also shown in Table 5.1, this would result in a V/C of 0.969 and LOS E and would fully mitigate the impact at this location. e ' "n AO ,oant hwt With the implementation of the above mitigation measures, there would be no remaining significant impacts in the AM peak hour or PM peak hour. As illustrated in Table 5.2, these mitigation measures would also fully mitigate the significant impacts identified in the Existing With Project conditions analysis. The Mobility Group 57 February 20, 2015 7, h O aCg 0 0 o c 0 p w w W w go o U q o R r, ON 0 a 0 � a o Pw U o 0 , o d w o w O M M M M N O 0 •� W q w q �y 0 � p u OR q iw a � PG OG a Vi oj 3 a m a°a � Cd o o F ori F m 7, N V1 z G .. O p � n m o U � rn o In3 o w q w� 3 m > q 13) o 0 0 ,p U U 0 0 � � a oa o En zi 0 N 09 i r �I r tm R z a i Table A-1. Trip Rate & Adjustments by Land Use Land Use Units Trip Rates Existing Future AM PM Internal% Transit InternaU Transit Walk Walk Residential -Apartments Dll' 0.51 0.62 10% 2% 15% 10% Single Fandly Residential Illi 0.75 1.00 10% 2% 15% 10% Public Facility' sf 0.00 0.00 ornmianity Center Sf 2.05 2.74 B3arik sf 0.00 12.13 20% 20% Fast p'e,od sf 45.42 32.65 20% 20% !l:.ennr°nunicatien Facilities sf 0.92 0.97 Irrrlus trial. st` . 0.92 0.97 2% 10% Manufacturing sf 0.73 0.73 2% Medical Office sf 2.39 3.57 Autry Repair sf 3.23 4.46 Office sf 1.56 1.49 2% 10% Goverjunent Office sf 5.88 1.21 2% 10% Retail st" 0.96 3.71 5% 10% 5% Restaurant - Quality sf 0.81 7.49 5% 20% 5% Restaurant - I°Iiglx'rurnover sf 10.81 9.85 5% 20% 5% Note: 1. Public facility sq. ft. are restrooms. No Vehicle trips generated. 1 "3 Mm w O O O r N M V' N CO CO ti f- N C M M 0 cm N N C. I C C M M O O 0.....0 M N N N m N N L C n i .N- i i M V � ' C N d CD z c0 N O O O f- f� N �7 C? N W C 0 n C) CN,� r Z O O O C1 o O c� M O N N M c aJ r� r` rn r` o ao 0o r ro O ..{% N N n 'C N ^ LL7 ('� M O O O m N "1 p8ppp c0 ZN M M LL7 C CL 2O o oN) N g Lq O O N C C r LO O CO z '.�..V 0� N M....m O Co O O T (' C 10 L c O M r r M M co a (a ® 7 N r 'G N NO y n In o o O o N rn N M I. M M O o f0 CJ M w 0 o M n 7 2 O O O cV O q O O N o r In r ICJ LL H N� OM O o 0 o M N M C 0) co aJ w M C M c8p c7 f� O) �D 3 O pCpp M � O O hM. coo N O O N 2 r O N Zr- r I) L C M ID In ' I � r r CL � O W p O M I co 0 . 100 0 ry ® o o N o 0 o N ui L Z I C N M N I O m r Iwo t C M e~- M hM•. -It (07 �. Mj F r N N C •y7 y ro 1AI. M O O 0 O N C f N O M f� W M M N fD Inr W cp IA UO En o O N o O o N (7 LL') N 4 k W C F oLQ c eT I6i aJ '- O fD Pte°^ C, Q W of o M N r® w ti® coo 10 ao 41 a) M 'O OO O N 1 a O r O O V N M O o M -7 rn m N N I���JJ eT 1� f- M 111 H y � Q W y H c N Qc E -6 E 'u c _ 'ro v E E c m 'v V' v 'vJ appE d pOE c g¢ o > }9 w( N r9 F 'vJ c 2 z iq U L C7 (V O N 8 p Y) k? O O O O N N �5 N m � N W m N CL .c O m M o 0 0 0 c4 ao v o N 11 cn ao0p ` N i i N r f0 N C7 N Z C b N ov M O O O f0 N W o ono O~i m ro H H all Z a w h o 0 o rn o o m a N m rn W c ti w co r- of j N i O � N N N W N C V M r M m O O O W O1 N N M N O Z L F nj M m > Q .0 W Onf onD M co O oOD Lq O O cV O O N U) �Qp L Z d � m y o `° a w rn 0 m n M Ue �r� v In a > C NN � cep co 0 o h rn rn r In V ry 6 G O N 0 00 LL F. W M O O O M m O N r N M rn <? Ico � N chi h � U C N 1N M M , M w Omi V f0 0 CIA V ti a m Z L d r CV N IIS C r r 1Lq m ti a) OOi On O Or N O O N O O O M a m ID l0 N LOC"ccoo LL7 - M O O GGon r—w N I cl M n1(NO O O r � OOi N V r td a+ N N� w17 n O — O N O O0 m M V c I[7 a0 o H C O t00 R O O Onl C', O 00 V) m c r rn n (71o poppp M M N r (a(ppo c} N N t0 m 7 d � 00 d rn O O N O N N O •- O O h O Ol h 07 t C �° Z C m w H _ � t N (0 d � vy _d U. C CL C Q a � � d E 'm ro J 'c 8 .7 m Et '� V y a li ti E E m d a o in a' U (V O N 8 p I 00 � C* 0 0N M �' 0 0 0 0 0 0 ell o o o o 0 0 o V° o 0 o r M ouolN OIo� NM9NlIt o W" o - M o, M N M o oll 00 — �o kn 00 C14 00 O Y M 00I ni o N N N N N N N ® M ri M NN N N N N N 110 N W) cin h kkn oo 00 vii o N M ori Existing AM Wed Nov 12, 2014 13:14:48 Page 3-1 Baldwin Park Existing AM Peak Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ***�**w+r+►+*,r*;►*.t+r***+t*,t:+►+r,a,r***,t**,r*.+r******,t*tri*****3***,t*+r,�*:*►�*,tw,t*�*ra**t***a Intersection #101 Maine & Ramona ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.671 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 47 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I ---------------II--------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 88 548 42 88 416 67 115 476 140 88 728 102 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 88 548 42 B8 416 67 115 476 140 88 728 102 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 88 548 42 88 416 67 115 476 140 88 728 102 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 88 54B 42 8B 416 67 115 476 140 88 728 102 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 88 548 42 88 416 67 115 476 140 88 728 102 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.86 0.14 1.00 1.72 0.28 1.00 1.55 0.45 1.00 1.75 0.25 Final Sat.: 1600 2972 228 1600 2756 444 1600 2473 727 1600 2807 393 ------------I---------------11---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.18 0.18 0.06 0.15 0.15 0.07 0.19 0.19 0.06 0.26 0.26 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP Existing PM Wed Nov 12, 2014 13:14:35 Page 3-1 Baldwin Park Existing PM Peak ----------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection 4101 Maine & Ramona Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.853 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 81 Level Of Service: D Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------__---- I ---------------II--------------- II---------------II---------------I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I --------------- II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 111 457 72 116 617 110 161 1017 186 129 635 100 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 111 457 72 116 617 110 161 1017 186 129 635 100 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 111 457 72 116 617 110 161 1017 186 129 635 100 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 111 457 72 116 617 110 161 1017 186 129 635 100 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 t.Vclume._._ 111_"1 _„-_ 7r_ 1.16 1�. ___-110 _ __161 1,017 _ 18.6-- _129 635 100 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II -_ --I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.73 0.27 1.00 1.70 0.30 1.00 1.69 0.31 1.00 1.73 0.27 Final Sat.: 1600 2764 436 1600 2716 484 1600 2705 495 1600 2765 435 ------------ I---------------II-------------_-II---------------II----------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.17 0.17 0.07 0.23 0.23 0.10 0.38 0.38 0.08 0.23 0.23 Crit Moves: **** **** *** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP Existing AM Wed Nov 12, 2014 13:14:48 Page 4-1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Baldwin Park Existing AM Peak Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #102 Bogart & Ramona Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.508 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 34 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T R --------------- II ---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 2 24 6 146 21 12 21 520 6 67 703 209 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 2 24 6 146 21 12 21 520 6 67 703 209 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 2 24 6 146 21 12 21 520 6 67 703 209 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 2 24 6 146 21 12 21 520 6 67 703 209 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 2 24 6 146 21 12 21 520 6 '67 703 209 ------------ I---------------II---------------il---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.80 0.20 1.00 0.64 0.36 1.00 1.98 0.02 1.00 1.54 0.46 Final Sat.: 1600 1280 320 1600 1018 582 1600 3163 37 1600 2467 733 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- 11---------=-----I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.09 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.16 0.04 0.28 0.29 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP Existing PM Wed Nov 12, 2014 13:14:35 Page 4-1 Baldwin Park Existing PM Peak -------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #102 Bogart & Ramona Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.574 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 38 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ---------------- II--------------- 11_____-____-____I Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- 11______-_____---I Volume Module: Base Vol: 13 38 13 166 12 45 41 1045 12 13 627 92 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 13 38 13 166 12 45 41 1045 12 13 627 92 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 13 38 13 166 12 45 41 1045 12 13 627 92 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 13 38 13 166 12 45 41 1045 12 13 627 92 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 '1.00 140 1.00_ -FinalVolume:--.1.3--- 38- _-_,---13 -, =-166 -- 12- -45 - -_..41 .10.45 12 ----,--13 627 -,r,---92 - - - --------------- - Saturation Flow Module; Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.75 0.25 1.00 0.21 0.79 1.00 1.98 0.02 1.00 1.74 0.26 Final Sat.: 1600 1192 408 1600 337 1263 1600 3164 36 1600 2791 409 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.10 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.33 0.33 0.01 0.22 0.22 Crit Moves: **** *** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP Existing AM Wed Nov 12, 2014 13:14:48 Page 5-1 Baldwin Park Existing AM Peak ----------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #103 Downing & Ramona Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol:/Cap.(X): 0.556 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 37 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L T - R L - T - R - ----=------ I ---------------II--------------- II---------------II---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ...__---------I --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vo -1; 28 60 31 109 47 9 3 617 36 51 963 95 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 28 60 31 109 47 9 3 617 36 51 963 95 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.,.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 28 60 31 109 47 9 3 617 36 51 963 95 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 28 60 31 109 47 9 3 617 36 51 963 95 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 28 60 31 109 47 9 3 617 36 51 963 95 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600` 1600-1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.32 0.68 1.00 0.67 0.28 0.05 1.00 1.89 0.11 1.00 1.82 0.18 Final Sat.: 509 1091 1600 1057 456 87 1600 3024 176 1600 2913 287 ------------ ---II --------------- II---------------- ..11---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.06 0.02 0.07 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.03 0.33 0.33 Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP Existing PM Wed Nov 12 2014 13.14.35 Page 5-1 -------------------------------------,---.---_, _-----....-_--------,.------____-,..,.__- Baldwin Park Existing PM Peak ------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #103 Downing & Ramona Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.548 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx optimal Cycle:� 36 Level Of Service: A Approach- North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R H---------------11---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights, Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 -----------=I---------------II--------------- II--------------- II--------------- I Volume Module: Base Vol: 12 21 29 49 31 12 2 1158 47 10 684 37 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 12 21 29 49 31 12 2 1158 47 10 684 37 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 12 21 29 49 31 12 2 1158 47 10 684 37 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 12 21 29 49 31 12 2 1158 47 10 684 37 PCE Adj: 1.00 1400 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 pl 0 10 684 37 2 1 47 FinalVo.lume- 12 X00 21 1_ 2 49 09 i i,O0 1.00 1.00 1..0000 1.001 11'00 1.00 1.00 ' MLF Ad 1 00 p Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.36 0.64 1.00 0.53 0.34 0.13 1.00 1.92 0.08 1.00 1.90 0.10 Final Sat.: 582 1018 1600 852 539 209 1600 3075 125 1600 3036 164 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.38 0.38 0.01 0.23 0.23 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Traffix 6.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP Existing AM - Wed Nov 12, 2014 13:14:48 Page 6-1 ------------------------------------------------------------ Baldwin Park Existing AM Peak -------------------7--------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #104 Ramona & Badillo Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.649 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 44 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R -II---------------11---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 II---------------II--------------- Volume Module: Base Vol: 9 2 17 2 0 315 160 589 8 2 785 5 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 9 2 17 2 0 315 160 589 8 2 785 5 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 9 2 17 2 0 315 160 589 B 2 785 5 Redudt Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 9 2 17 2 0 315 160 589 8 2 785 5 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 9 2 17 2 0 315 160 589 8 2 785 5 II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.32 0.07 0.61 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.97 0.03 1.00 1.99 0.01 Final Sat.: 514 114 971 1600 0 1600 1600 3157 43 1600 3180 20 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------11---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.10 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.25 0.25 Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP Existing PM Wed Nov 12, 2014 13:14:35 Page 6-1 Baldwin euzk Existing ma Peak -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lavel of Service Computation Report ICU l(L�ss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection °#zo«°Ramona ^u+Baaillo°°°°°°°°^+*�°°+°°^�°°°°°°°^°°°°+�+°°°°°°°°°�°° Cycle (sec): zno Critical vvl'/oan. (X): 0'574 Lnoa Time (^oc); lo Average Delay (oec/veu): xouxax optimal Cycle: au Level of aocvico:A°�°° owgzoocu: North Bound South oovou East Bound West Bound Movement: L - r - R L - c - m L - z - m L - T - u ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- |\--------------- Control: Permitted Permitted Protected rrotooteu Rights: zuclnde Include Include Include Min. Green: Q 0 Q 0 0 O O 0 0 O O O Y+R; 4^0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4-0 6.0 4,0 4'0 4.0 Lanes: G 0 1! 0 0 I 0 U % 1 0 I 1 0 1 U I l 0 ------------ }---------------i �---------------\|------------------------------| vvlune Module: ouoe vol, a u y s o uoz coo y*o 11 y 476 « Growth Auj: 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 l'oO z,UO z'UO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial nso: 6 u y s o 241 ouo *so 11 o 47e « User Adj` 1,80 1.00 1'00 1.00 1'00 1.00 1'00 1,00 z^OO 1.00 1.00 1.00 raF Auj, 1.00 1.00 z'oO 1.00 z'Un 1.00 1.00 z'oU z'oo 1.00 1'00 1.00 PoF Volume: e u e 6 o 241 uoo yyo 11 y 476 « n*uuot Vol: o O 0 O O 0 O o u O 0 U Reduced Vol,: 6 2 g 6 2 241 250 990 11 9 476 4 POE Ad�: 1.00 1.0 0 2�00 I.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 l'OV 1.00 1.08 1.00 1,00 MLzAdj: 1�Q0 1.U0 1.0O 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 l`OO 1.00 1.00 -Flnslvoln��'- ��'._6 -`. 2~_., .9-__1 (�- .°�� 2.._ .241 250 990 ~_..11 .9�-476_-~ _4 ------------|---------------||------------------~| | --------------- Saturation Flo~ Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1800 1600 1600 I000 1600 16OO 16OO �6oO �0OO Adjustment: 1.00 1'00 1.00 z'on 1'00 l,nO 1.00 1'00 l'oo 1'00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: o'sa o'zu n'ss 1'00 o'oz o.yy 1.00 1'98 0'02 1'00 z'on n'oo Final aut.: sos 188 oor 1600 zs 1587 zsoo 3165 ao 1600 3173 27 ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- III ---------------| o^nmoitv Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0,01 0.01 O'On 0.15 0,15 0.16 0'31 0'31 0'01 0'15 0.15 Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP Existing AM Wed Nov 12, 2014 13:14:48 Page 7-1 Baldwin Park Existing AM Peak ----------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #105 Puente & Badillo Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.597 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 40 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I ---------------II--------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Control:. Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 -I---------------II---------------II----------------11---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 204 94 44 3 107 47 74 349 262 69 681 41 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 204 94 44 3 107 47 74 349 282 69 681 41 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 204 94 44 3 107 47 74 349 282 69 681 41 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 204 94 44 3 107 47 74 349 282 69 681 41 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 204 94 44 3 107 47 74 349 282 69 681 41 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1600 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.60 0.27 0.13 0.02 0.68 0.30 1.00 1.11 0.89 1.00 1.89 0.11 Final Sat.: 954 440 206 31 1090 479 1600 1770 1430 1600 3018 182 ------------ I --------------- II ---------------II--------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.05 0.20 0.20 0.04 0.23 0.23 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP Existing PM Wed Nov 12, 2014 13:14:35 Page 7-1 Baldwin Park Existing PM Peak - Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #105 Puente & Badillo Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.666 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 46 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II--------------- II---------------II---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 146 81 82 13 97 29 45 891 169 53 365 16 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 146 81 82 13 97 29 45 891 169 53 365 16 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 146 81 82 13 97 29 45 B91 169 53 365 16 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 146 81 82 13 97 29 45 891 169 53 365 16 PCE Adj:. 1..00 1.00 !.„00 1.00 :R..„00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj : 1.00 1.00 I_. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1...009... 00 1.00 1..:00 1.00 1.00 !Nina-iVokume: 146 - 8..1 82 13 97 -29 45....:-891 469 ...S3- ,365 1 ------------I---------------II--------------- II_--------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.47 0.26 0.27 0.09 0.70 0.21 1.00 1.68 0.32 1.00 1.92 0.08 Final Sat.: 756 419 425 150 1117 334 1600 2690 510 1600 3066 134 ------------ I ---------------II-------- ------- II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.19 0.19 0.01 0.09 0.09 0.03 0.33 0.33 0.03 0.12 0.12 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP Existing AM Wed Nov 12, 2014 13:14:48 Page 8-1 Baldwin Park Existing AM Peak ------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #106 Maine & Palmrose Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.360 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 27 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I ---------------II--------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Permitted Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 686 11 37 579 0 0 0 0 12 0 31 GrowthAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 IniLlal 'Bse: 0 686 11 37 579 0 0 0 0 12 0 31 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 686 11 37 579 0 0 0 0 12 0 31 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Re(,:)uded Vol: 0 686 11 37 579 0 0 0 0 12 0 31 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 686 11 37 579 0 0 0 0 12 0 31 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 1.97 0.03 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 3149 51 1600 3200 0 0 0 0 1600 0 1600 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.02 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.02 Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP Existing PM Wed Nov 12, 2014 13:14:35 ®-®®-Page®8-1-®® -----------------_-°--_----_ _ Baldwin Park Existing PM Peak ---------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #106 Maine & Palmrose Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.382 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 40 Level Of Service: A Approach.- Norvir Bound. Soaith Bound East Boaand West Bound Movement: L- T_ R L- T -, R L- T_ R L- T R _-. __ - ._ _II --------------- Control; Permitted Protected, Permitted Permitted Rights- include Include Include Include Min. Gram: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4..0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes. 0 0 1 1 0 :1. 0 2 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 692 15 32 876 0 0 0 0 14 0 23 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 692 15 32 876 0 0 0 0 14 0 23 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 692 15 32 876 p' 0 0 0 14 0 23 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 692 15 32 876 0' 0 0 0 14 0 23 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 'e..00 1.00 -.---FinalVolume:...:_ __0= -692. _. 15 ,_ 32 876__----0 -- 0 _0 _ 0 14 0 23 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- 11---------------- II--. _ _ _....__-I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 1.96 0.04 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 3132 66 1600 3200 0 0 0 0 1600 0 1600 ------------I---------------)I--------------10-------------(I--------------N Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.02 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP Existing AM Wed Nov 12, 2014 13:14:48 Page 9-1 Baldwin Park Existing AM Peak ----------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length W) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #107 Maine & Clark Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.560 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 37 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II--------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 60 639 13 59 566 45 49 86 59 24 126 152 Growth Adj: 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 60 639 13 59 566 45 49 86 59 24 126 152 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 60 639 13 59 566 45 49 86 59 24 126 152 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 60 639 13 59 566 45 49 86 59 24 126 152 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 60 639 13 59 566 45 49 86 59 24 126 152 >-----------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module. Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.96 0.04 1.00 1.85 0.15 0.36 0.64 1.00 0.08 0.42 0.50 Final Sat.: 1600 3136 64 1600 2964 236 581 1019 1600 127 668 805 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.20 0.20 0.04 0.19 0.19 0.03 0.08 0.04 0.02 0.19 0.19 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP Existing PM Wed Nov 12, 2014 13:14:35 Page 9-1 ------------------------------- Baldwin - ___d_ -.„__--__-----..__.._.Baldwin Park Existing PM Peak ___________________________ _ Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #107 Maine & Clark Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.551 Loss Time (sec)•. 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 36 Tevel Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I---------------II-------------- II ---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 101 551 13 66 800 29 42 89 75 28 75 61 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 101 551 13 66 600 29 42 69 75 26 75 61 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 101 551 13 66 800 29 42 89 75 28 75 61 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 101 551 13 66 800 29 42 89 75 28 75 61 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume:- 101= : 551- --13- 6 000 , -29---42 89 --7.5- 28 75, 1 --------------- 11--------------- --1 1 .._--- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.95 0.05 1.00 1.93 0.07 0.32 0.68 1.00 0.17 0.46 0.37 Final Sat.: 1600 3126 74 1600 3088 112 513 1087 1600 273 732 595 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.18 0.18 0.04 0.26 0.26 0.03 0.08 0.05 0.02 0.110 0.10 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP Existing AM Wed Nov 12, 2014 13:14:48 Page 10-1 Baldwin Park Existing AM Peak ----------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #108 Maine & Los Angeles Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.662 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 46 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --II--------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I --------------- II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 148 655 24 49 487 101 120 290 119 63 605 71 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 148 655 24 49 487 101 120 290 119 63 605 71 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 148 655 24 49 487 101 120 290 119 63 605 71 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 148 655 24 49 487 101 120 290 119 63 605 71 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 148 655 24 49 487 101 120 290 119 63 605 71 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.93 0.07 1.00 1.66 0.34 1.00 1.42 0.58 1.00 1.79 0.21 Final Sat.: 1600 3087 113 1600 2650 550 1600 2269 931 1600 2864 336 --- = -------- I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- H ---------------q Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.21 0.21 0.03 0.18 0.18 0.08 0.13 0.13 0.09 0.21 0.21 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP Existing PM Wed Nov 12, 2014 13:14:35 Page 10-1 Baldwin Park Existing PM Peak --------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #108 Maine & Los Angeles Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.712 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 51 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------I1---------------II---------------I Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 137 532 48 63 640 56 116 722 1B3 41 233 46 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 137 532 48 63 640 56 116 722 183 41 233 46 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 137 532 48 63 640 56 116 722 183 41 233 46 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 137 532 48 63 640 56 116 722 183 41 233 46 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 F Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - - - -_--=ialVol e:- --1=37• -=532- -48 _ -°63 -640 - 56 -.-- 11-6 722 -=183 =-41--=233 _ =-.6 I --r----. ------- 11 --------------- II--------------- II--------------- I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.83 0.17 1.00 1.84 0.16 1.00 1.60 0.40 1.00 1.67 0.33 Final Sat.: 1600 2935 265 1600 2943 257 1600 2553 647 1600 2672 528 ------------ I --------------- II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.18 0.18 0.04 0.22 0.22 0.07 0.2B 0.28 0.03 0.09 0.09 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP Existing AM Wed Nov 12, 2014 13:14:48 Page 11-1 Baldwin Park Existing AM Peak ----------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #109 Pacific & Bogart ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: C[ 20.4] Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 626 28 22 698 2 2 0 2 4 2 11 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 826 28 22 698 2 2 0 2 4 2 11 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF 'Volume: 0 826 28 22 698 2 2 0 2 4 2 11 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 826 28 22 698 2 2 0 2 4 2 11 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 854 xxxx xxxxx 1157 1597 350 1233 1584 427 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 794 xxxx xxxxx 154 108 652 135 110 582 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 794 xxxx xxxxx 146 105 652 132 107 582 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.03 xxxx xxxx 0.01 0.00 0.001. 0.03 0.02 0.02 Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 9.7 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * A Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 238 xxxxx xxxx 250 xxxxx SharedQueue: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxxx 0.2 xxxxx Shrd ConDel: 7.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 20.4 xxxxx xxxxx 20.4 xxxxx Shared LOS: A * * * * * * C * * C ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 20.4 20.4 ApproachLOS: * * C C Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP Existing PM Wed Nov %z 2014 13:14;35 Page 12-1 Baldwin Park Existing PM Peak ------------------- Level __~~_--____-____ LwveI Of SmrVice Computation Report 1c8 J(l�oss as Cycle LeuqLh Method (Sase Volume Alternative) *+k***+^w^* **~^°+*+**°~***~*°^+°w~*,m*********^***w*+*^***+~**~**+**°°*^****'*°*** Intersection #110 Pacific: & Downing ^++**�*^~�w*+****w^**^+^*^*+*** *~+°*+^**e+* °**^^�^^*^*a^°*w�`^�+��*°+*^°*°^**^° Cycle (Sec): 100 critil:,-al Vol. /Cap.(u)M$0 1,055 Time (.90c) : 10 Average Delay (mac/w*b): XXXXmm Optimal �Cycle; 30Level �Of*Service: A °,* ***^*++*^****°°°+*° Approach- North Dound south sound East Bound We3l. Bound Movement: _ T - R L - T - R L - � - R L - T - R ~-----------|------~--------L|-------------~~!|i Control.: Permitted Permitted Permitted Fezmitted Rights. Include Include Include Include Min. Green. O V Q 0 O 0 8 Q & � Y+R; 4-0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,8 *A 4.0 4.0 4.0, Laoes: I Q I l 0 1 0 1 1 Q 8 0 l[ 0 0 0 U 1! W W ------------|||~--------------|I---------------A|~--------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 6 714 oz oo 987 9 Is « s oo 1 oO Growth Ruj: z'UO 1.00 1.00 1'00 z'on 1.00 1.00 1.00 I,ou z'OU 1'80 l.Oo Initial ase: 6 714 «z 50 987 e 13 x 5 ns 1 50 User Adj: 1'00 1'00 1'00 1'08 1'00 1,00 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PaF uuj: 1'00 z'oo 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1'00 1,00 1.00 ear Volume: 6 714 oz 58 987 n 13 w 5 85 z 50 meduot vol: o O U O o D O n o O n O Reduced vol; 6 714 41 sO e87 9 la 4 5 85 1 oO ecm adj' 1.00 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1'00 1,00 1,00 MLF Adj; 1.00 1'00 1,00 1.00 1.00 z^Qo z'oo 1.00 z'oo z'oo 1.00 1.00 FioalVozome:---6-'714--_-41'--50 -g87--_-'.9 13 __`'4'_-5---05�-�1 50� ------------ i --------------- \|--------------- |I -----------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 z600 �son zoou �sno ��oo �6ou Adjustment: 1.00 1'00 1.00 z.On 1.00 l'nn 1.00 z'uo l.00 1'00 z'Ou 1.00 Lanes: 1'00 1'89 0'11 z'Oo 1'98 0'02 0'59 0.18 0.23 0.62 o'oz 0'37 Final oat': 1600 soua 174 zono 3171 xp y«o 291 364 1000 zu son ------------ |--------------- {|--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Capacity Analysis --------------naeacityAoulvoio mvunle` 0.01 n'Os O'on 0.09 Vol/Sat: o'oo 0'24 o'o« n'Us 0'31 0.31 0'01 O'Ul Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP Existing AM Wed Nov 12, 2014 13:14:48 Page 13-1 Baldwin Park Existing AM Peak Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #111 Pacific & Big Dalton Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.535 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 35 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Control: Protected Permitted Per Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 -------®----I- II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 77 770 1 7 658 77 162 4 83 3 0 6 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1,.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 77 770 1 7 658 77 162 4 83 3 0 6 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 77 770 1 7 658 77 162 4 83 3 0 6 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 77 770 1 7 658 77 162 4 83 3 0 6 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 77 770 1 7 658 77 162 4 83 3 0 6 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.79 0.21 0.65 0.02 0.33 0.33 0.00 0.67 Final Sat.: 1600 3196 4 1600 2865 335 1041 26 533 533 0 1067 ------------ I ---------------II--------------- II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.24 0.24 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.10 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.01 Crit Moves: **** ******* **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP Existing PM Wed Nov 12, 2014 13:14:35 Page 13-1 Baldwin Park Existing PM Peak - - ®�--- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #111 Pacific & Big Dalton Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.577 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 38 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I ---------------II--------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Protected Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ------------ I---------------II---------------I{---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 49 654 0 4 947 93 99 4 91 0 0 1 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 49 654 0 4 947 93 99 4 91 0 0 1 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 49 654 0 4 947 93 99 4 91 0 0 1 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 49 654 0 4 947 93 99 4 91 0 0 1 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj,. 0 1,.010 1.00 ! . 0:� - - FinalVolumc-.-1-®49 16-54 - .00 1..00 1®- 4 1-00 :�. I 947 1.93 q , - - 91 0 -0 -1-1 ------------I---------------II---------------1l---------------11---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600- 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 1.82 0.18 0.51 0.02 0.47 0.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 0 1600 2914 286 816 33 751 0 0 1600 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.32 0.06 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0718 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP Existing AM Wed Nov 12, 2014 13:14:48 Page 14-1 Baldwin Park Existing AM Peak Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #112 Cesar Chaez & Ramona wwwww*wwwww**wwwwww**wwwww,�w**www*www***�*www*wwwww*www*wwww***wwwww*www*ww**,�** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.424 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 30 Level Of Service: A wwww*www+www+*wwwwwwwwwwwwww**wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww*wwwwwww*wwwwwwwwwwwww Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 - -----------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 10 0 34 49 686 0 0 844 7 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 10 0 34 49 686 0 0 844 7 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 10 0 34 49 686 0 0 844 7 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 10 0 34 49 686 0 0 844 7 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 10 0 34 49 686 0 0 844 7 ---------®--I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.77 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.98 0.02 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 364 0 1236 1600 3200 0 0 3174 26 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.27 Crit Moves: wwww wwww *www wwwwwwwwwwwwww*wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP Existing PM Wed Nov 12, 2014 13:14:35 Page 14-1 Baldwin Park Existing PM Peak -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #112 Cesar Chaez & Ramona Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.539 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx optimal Cycle: 68 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------- I ---------------II--------------- II---------------II---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 22 0 54 57 1252 0 0 842 14 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 22 0 54 57 1252 0 0 842 14 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 22 0 54 57 1252 0 0 842 14 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 22 0 54 57 1252 0 0 842 14 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4..00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1..00 1,00 1.00 4.. 00 4..00 1. M 00 4.. 00 3_00 1- 00 11..00 FinalV°olu:me: 0 0 0 22 0 _54 57 :02,52 0 , _0 842 14. --------------- II-------- ------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.71 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.97 0.03 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 463 0 1137 1600 3200 0 0 3148 52 ------------ I ---------------ll--------------- II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.05 0.04 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.27 Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP Existing AM Wed Nov 12, 2014 13:14:48 Page 15-1 Baldwin Park Existing AM Peak ----------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #113 Baldwin Park & Ramona ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.555 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 37 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II--------------- II-_-------------II---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 85 396 112 92 390 126 114 566 10 102 612 36 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 85 396 112 92 390 126 114 566 10 102 612 36 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 85 396 112 92 390 126 114 566 10 102 612 36 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 85 396 112 92 390 126 114 566 10 102 612 36 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 85 396 112 92 390 126 114 566 10 102 612 36 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.97 0.03 1.00 1.89 0.11 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3144 56 1600 3022 178 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.12 0.07 0.06 0.12 0.08 0.07 0.18 0.18 0.06 0.20 0.20 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP Existing PM Wed Nov 12, 2014 13:14:35 Page 15-1 Baldwin Park Existing PM Peak ------------------------------------ Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #113 Baldwin Park & Ramona * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *****************ak Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vo)../Cap.(): 0.784 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (scc/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 63 Level Of Service; C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Boutid West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - 'T R L - T - R ------------1---------------II---------------II--- .w -._-.e.. __ II ---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 - ---------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 77 371 216 181 426 84 132 966 46 191 561 67 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 77 371 216 181 426 84 132 966 46 191 561 67 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 77 371 216 181 426 84 132 966 46 191 561 67 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 77 371 216 181 426 84 132 966 46 191 561 67 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: -77 --a7°1- -al --181 --426- - -=84 -132 -•966 -46 -:1-91-- 561 -----67- - - --------- I --------------- --------------- --------------- ----------- ---67----------I---------------II---------__----II----------------II----------- ---Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.91 0.09 1.00 1.79 0.21 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3055 145 1600 2859 341 ------------ I---------------II--------=------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.12 0.14 0.11 0.13 0.05 0.08 0.32 0.32 0.12 0.20 0.20 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP Existing AM Wed Nov 12, 2014 13:14:48 Page 16-1 Baldwin Park Existing AM Peak ----------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #114 Stewart & Ramona Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Ca .(X): 0.561 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 37 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 77 106 105 31 67 50 50 551 41 56 729 7 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 77 106 105 31 67 50 50 551 41 56 729 7 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 77 106 105 31 67 50 50 551 41 56 729 7 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 77 106 105 31 67 50 50 551 41 56 729 7 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 77 106 105 31 67 50 50 551 41 56 729 7 --------- --- I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.27 0.37 0.36 0.21 0.45 0.34 1.00 1.B6 0.14 1.00 1.98 0.02 Final Sat.: 428 589 583 335 724 541 1600 2978 222 1600 3170 30 ------------I---------------11---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.18 0.18 0.02 0.09 0.09 0.03 0.18 0.19 0.04 0.23 0.23 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP Existing PM Wed Nov 12, 2014 13:14:35 Page 16-1 ---------------------------------------_-_-___--------------------------------- Baldwin Park Existing PM Peak -------- - ------ Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #114 Stewart & Ramona Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.596 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle• 40 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I --------------- 11--------------- II--------------- 11---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 40 85 67 25 80 37 100 948 40 82 489 23 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 40 85 67 25 60 37 100 948 40 82 489 23 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 40 85 67 25 B0 37 100 948 40 82 489 23 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 40 85 67 25 80 37 100 948 40 82 489 23 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1„00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,.00 1.00 :1.0O 1.00 Fina=lVolume: --40 --85 - -67 ?.5 ----80 37 100 9.48 40 _82 489 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Saturation ------ -----Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.21 0.44 0.35 0.18 0.56 0.26 1.00 1.92 0.08 1.00 1.91 0.09 Final Sat.: 333 708 558 282 901 417 1600 3070 130 1600 3056 144 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------11---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.12 0.12 0.02 0.09 0.09 0.06 0.31 0.31 0.05 0.16 0.16 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP Existing AM Wed Nov 12, 2014 13:14:48 Page 17-1 Baldwin Park Existing AM Peak ----------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #115 Merced & Ramona ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.648 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 44 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I---------------II---------------II--------------- II ---------------I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights:' Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module:, Base Vol: 139 263 52 72 281 122 108 520 46 29 813 45 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 139 263 52 72 281 122 108 520 46 29 813 45 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 139 263 52 72 281 122 108 520 46 29 813 45 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 139 263 52 72 281 122 108 520 46 29 813 45 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 139 263 52 72 281 122 108 520 46 29 813 45 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.67 0.33 1.00 1.39 0.61 1.00 1.84 0.16 1.00 1.90 0.10 Final Sat.: 1600 2672 528 1600 2231 969 1600 2940 260 1600 3032 168 ------------ I---------------II---------------II--------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.05 0.13 0.13 0.07 0.18 0.18 0.02 0.27 0.27 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP Existing PM Wed Nov 12, 2014 13:14:35 Page 17-1 r Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #115 Merced & Ramona Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.624 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Opti -mal Cycle: 42 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II--------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------I---------------II---------------11---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 37 266 62 62 300 41 113 978 132 57 473 68 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 37 266 62 62 300 41 113 978 132 57 473 68 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 37 266 62 62 300 41 113 978 132 57 473 68 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 37 266 62 62 300 41 113 978 132 57 473 68 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1®06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fin&lVolume: 37. 266-- --62- ,--6Z -300 --4-1- -1-1-3-47-8 --132- - 5T--=473 --68:- ------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.62 0.38 1.00 1.76 0.24 1.00 1.76 0.24 1.00 1.75 0.25 Final Sat.: 1600 2595 605 1600 2815 385 1600 2819 381 1600 2798 402 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------11---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.10 0.10 0.04 0.11 0.11 0.07 0.35 0.35 0.04 0.17 0.17 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP Existing AM Wed Nov 12, 2014 13:14:48 Page 18-1 Baldwin Park Existing AM Peak -------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #116 Merced & Baldwin Park Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.595 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 40 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II-------2-------II---------------II---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ®--®--------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 184 418 191 50 298 103 98 434 72 155 592 44 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 164 418 191 50 298 103 98 434 72 155 592 44 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 184 418 191 50 298 103 98 434 72 155 592 44 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 184 418 191 50 298 103 98 434 72 155 592 44 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 164 418 191 50 298 103 98 434 72 155 592 44 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.37 0.63 1.00 1.49 0.51 1.00 1.72 0.28 1.00 1.86 0.14 Final Sat.: 1600 2196 1004 1600 2378 B22 1600 2745 455 1600 2979 221 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.19 0.19 0.03 0.13 0.13 0.06 0.16 0.16 0.10 0.20 0.20 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP Existing PM Wed Nov 12, 2014 13:14:36 Page 18-1 Baldwin Park Existing PM Peak ------------------- - Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #116 Merced & Baldwin Park ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.684 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 48 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I---------------II---------------II--------------- II ---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 75 312 166 31 391 91 100 688 116 217 535 32 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 75 312 166 31 391 91 100 688 116 217 535 - 32 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 75 312 166 31 391 91 100 688 116 217 535 32 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 75 312 166 31 391 91 100 688 116 217 535 32 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: - 75 312 1.66 31. 391 9). x:00 688_ _ 116 -- 217 _ 535 _ 32 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------11---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ,Lanes: 1.00 1.31 0.69 1.00. 1.62 0.36 1.00 1.71 0.29 1.00 1.89 0.11 Final Sat.: 1600 2089 1111 1600 2596 604 1600 2738 462 1600 3019 181 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------11---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.15 0.15 0.02 0.15 0.15 0.06 0.25 0.25 0.14 0.18 0.18 Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWOP AM Fri Feb 20, 2015 13:40:52 Page 4-1 ----------------------- _------®-- Baldwin Park - FWOP - AM -- ----------- I - -------------------------------------------- Level OfServiceComputation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #101 Maine & Ramona Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.732 Loss Time (see): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 54 Level Of Service: C 1tpproarh: 14ort.1: Bou"d aout,li Hound East Bound West Bound Moveme:'t.1: U T _ R R L T R L T ---R __-. _II ---------®----- II ---------- ---------- protected protected Protected Protected % ntr - -I ights. Include lncl.racle Include Include 0 0 0 0 0 Min, Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y -RR: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4..0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 1 1. 41 ----II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 54&1 42 )i (i 4.'16 67 '1...15 476 146 88 728 102 GrowthAdj: 1.0.9 1.09 1..01 1.09 1.09 1,09 1..09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 Initial Bse'. 90 596 46 16 452 73 1.25 518 152 96 792 111 Added Vol: 1.4 2'2 0 0 1.5 0 0 91 8 0 14 0 PasserByVol..: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ® 0 0 Initial. Fut: 110 618 46 96 467 73 125 527 160 96 B06 111 User Ad j: 1..00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 :4.100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ffir A,dj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P11F Volume: 11.0 618 46 96 467 73 1.25 527 160 96 806 111 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 110 618 46 96 467 "73 1.25 527 160 96 806 111 00 POP, Adj 1..00 1.;00 1.00 1;.00 1...00 1:.,..00 1;.-O 1,(�� l'!P0 '1. "I'll 1.01 x.0(1_ L LF Adjj�. '1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 1 MLI" Ad 125 527 160 96 806 111 -...- 3um .,1-110- 618 w. ---- II -- 46 96 6 --.._ II --------------- II------ ------ ---I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.86 0.14 1.00 1.73 0.27 1.00 1.53 0.47 1.00 1.76 0.24 Final Sat.: 1600 2980 220 1600 2768 432 1600 2453 747 1600 2813 387 --------------- II-......------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.21 0.21 0.06 0.17 0.17 0.08 0.21 0.21 0.06 0.29 0.29 Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP aWoe em Fri Feb on, 2015 13:41;33 cage 4-1 _____________________________________________________________________________ ouldvio Park - oWor - aa Level Of Service Computation Report zon l(L000 as ovczo Length o) ootuou (Future vozone Alternative) zutoruoction #zoI moioa a mauoou Cycle (sec): zoO Critical voz,/cap. (z): 0'955 Loss Time (sec): IO Average Delay (oec/veu): xruuxo optimal Cycle: zJo Leval Of Service: o Approach: North auuou South Bound oust Bound west Bound Movement: L - T - u L - r - m L - r - m L - z - m ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: zuolnda Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 o O O 0 U O o o n o n r+u; 4.o 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 «.o 4.0 «.O 4.0 4.0 «.O *.0 Lanes: 1 O l l p z n l 1 0 1 o I 1 0 1 n 1 1 U ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||---------------| vulnme Module: Base vol' Ill 457 72 118 617 zzn 181 1017 186 zxy 635 zno Growth Auj: 1.09 1.0* 1.09 1'09 1.09 1'09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 Initial oao; 121 497 78 1e6 671 120 175 1106 zOe 140 oeu zoy uudou vol: Io 41 o O «o o O 20 19 o uo 0 naoaerayvol: O 0 O O o O O o o o 0 0 Initial Fut: 137 538 78 1e6 715 zoU 175 1126 221 140 710 189 noec Auj: 1.00 z'nO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 z'oo 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 eor auj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ear Volume: 137 538 78 126 715 120 175 1126 221 zoo 710 109 oeduot Vol: o o O o O o o O 0 O u O Reduced Vol: 137 538 78 126 715 120 175 1I26 221 140 710 zoe PCE adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1'00 1-00 1.00 1'00 1.00 mLF adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1'00 z'nO 1.00 rioazvolome: 137 538 78 zzo 715 zun 175 1126 221 140 rzo 109 ------------|--------------- ||-------- ------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Saturation Flow Module., Sat/Lane: I000 1600 zsuO zsoo 1600 1600 lsoo 1600 1600 1000 lann 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1'00 z'oo 1.00 1.00 l'Uo 1.00 1'00 l.00 Lanes: z'oU 1'75 0.25 z'nn 1.71 0.29 1,00 I.67 0.33 1.00 1.73 0.27 Final oat.' 1600 2793 407 1600 2741 459 1600 2674 zus zsoo 2775 425 -------------|---------------| |---------------| |---------------\|--------------- Capacity »owzyuio Module: Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.19 0.19 0,08 0.26 0'26 0.11 0.42 O,«z 0.09 0.26 0.25 Crit Mmrao, Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWOP AM Fri Feb 20, 2015 13:40:52 Page 5-1 ---------------- .----------- Baldwin Park - FWOP - AM Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #102 Bogart & Ramona Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol.,/Cap.(X): 0.550 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 36 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L ------------ I ---------------II--------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes* 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I ---------------II--------------- II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 2 24 6 146 21 12 21 520 6 67 703 209 Growth Adj: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 Initial Bse: 2 26 7 159 23 13 23 565 7 73 764 227 Added Vol: 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 9 0 1 14 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 2 26 10 159 23 13 23 574 7 74 718 227 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 2 26 10 159 23 13 23 574 7 74 778 227 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 2 26 10 159 23 13 23 574 7 74 776 227 PCE Adj": 1.00 1.00 1:,00 1a00 I°00 -e00---lvoo-- -i 00- l-.'00---I.00:-SAO 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 2 26 10 159 23 13 23 574 7 74 T78 227 -®---------- I --------------- II ---------------II--------------- II--------------- Saturation ------------Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.73 0.27 1.00 0.64 0.36 1.00 1.98 0.02 1.00 1.55 0.45 Final Sat.: 1600 1172 428 1600 1018 582 1600 3164 36 1600 2477 723 I--------------- II--------------- II-.._..m__a.. _-_---II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.10 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.18 0.18 0.05 0.31 0.31 Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWOP PM Fri Feb 20, 2015 13:41:33 Page 5-1 Baldwin Park - FWOP - PM Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #102 Bogart & Ramona Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.625 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 42 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II--------------- II ---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 --------------------------------------------------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 13 38 13 166 12 45 41 1045 12 13 627 92 Growth Adj: 1.09 1:09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 Initial Bse: 14 41 14 1B1 13 49 45 1136 13 14 682 100 Added Vol: 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 20 0 4 20 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 14 41 16 181 13 49 45 1156 13 18 702 100 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 14 41 16 181 13 49 45 1156 13 18 702 100 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 14 41 16 181 13 49 45 1156 13 18 702 100 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 14 41 16 181 13 49 45 1156 13 18 702 100 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.72 0.28 1.00 0.21 0.79 1.00 1.98 0.02 1.00 1.75 0.25 Final Sat.: 1600 1151 449 1600 337 1263 1600 3164 36 1600 2801 399 ------------ I---------------II--------------_II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 1 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.11 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.37 0.37 0.01 0.25 0.25 Crit Moves Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWOP AM Fri Feb 20® 2015 13:40:52 Page 6-1 -------------------------------- ------__----_----_--_---------_ Baldwin Park - FWOP Level. Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #103 Downing & Ramona Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.600 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 40 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T R --------------� Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II_ --___-__--____I Volume Module: Base Vol: 28 60 31 109 47 9 3 617 36 51 963 95 Growth Adj: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 Initial Bse: 30 65 34 119 51 10 3 671 39 55 1047 103 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 15 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 30 65 34 119 51 10 3 683 39 55 1062 103 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 30 65 34 119 51 10 3 683 39 55 1062 103 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 30 65 34 119 51 10 3 683 39 55 1062 103 PCE -Adj : 1--00--1- =00- -1 m 00 -1 00- el -;--00- -1-; 00 1,00 1..00 1.. 0,0 1-0-0- 1,0Q 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1®00 1®00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 30 65 34 119 51 10 3 683 39 55 1062 103 ------------ I ---------------II--------------- II---------------II--------------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adj ustrraent: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.32 0.68 1.00 0.67 0.28 0.05 1.00 1.89 0.11 1.00 1.82 0.18 Final Sat.: 509 1091 1600 1057 456 87 1600 3027 173 1600 2916 284 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------11---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.06 0.02 0.07 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.03 0.,36 0.36 Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWOP PM Fri Feb 20, 2015 13:41:33 Page 6-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------=--=------ Baldwin Park - FWOP - PM Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #103 Downing & Ramona Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.594 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 40 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II--------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 i--------------- I I-------------- I I--------------- I I--------------- I Volume Module: Base Vol: 12 21 29 49 31 12 2 1158 47 10 684 37 Growth Adj: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 Initial Bse: 13 23 32 53 34 13 2 1259 51 11 744 40 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 23 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 13 23 32 53 34 13 2 1281 51 11 767 40 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.„.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 13 23 32 53 34 13 2 1281 51 11 767 40 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 13 23 32 53 34 13 2 1281 51 11 767 40 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 13 23 32 53 34 13 2 1281 51 11 767 40 -------°-----I---------------Il---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.36 0.64 1.00 0.53 0.34 0.13 1.00 1.92 0.08 1.00 1.90 0.10 Final Sat.: 582 1018 1600 852 539 209 1600 3077 123 1600 3040 160 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.42 0.42 0.01 0.25 0.25 Crit Moves **** **** **** ** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP eWor AM Fri Feb oo, cuzz z»:xu:so Page 7-1 ---___-_-_-_-__________-_--_____--______--_-__________-__ aaldwio Park - nWoe - AM --------------------------------------------- Level, of Service Computation oanort zcn z(Losa as Cycle Length x) Method (Future Volume aztecnative)°°*+°�+°* Intersection *#zU4°Ramona ^u*oa4izlo°^+�°^°�***��^°^°*�^�°°^°+°*~°^^°°°�^^*++*�°*+ Cycle (oec): zVo Critical voz-/Coe.(X): 0.70e Loss Time <aeo>: 10 Average Delay (sem/veu): oxxxxx Optimal +Cycle: 5ILevel �of+Service: c*°*^ u North a0004 South euoud East Bound West Bound ~~`e~~^^' Approach: L o_ r _ R z _ T _ R L - r - u L |------------ !--------------- ||--------------- || _______________ ||--------------- 000tcoI; Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: zoozode Include Include zoczoue MinGreen: o V O o Q O D u u u O o r+R�'4.0 «.0 4.0 4'0 «.o 8.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 «'o «'D 4.o Lanes: 0 o 1! o 0 1 O O 1 o z o z z o || | ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- --------------- | |--------------- Volume module: auae Vol: p z 17 z n 315 160 oVy o c 7ao � Growth Auj' z'On 1'09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.0e 1'09 1.09 1.09 1.09 z'o9 Initial ase: zV 2 zo o o s*s 174 640 y 2 854 u auuou Vol: 0 o n o o 7 o zz o O o o easoozByVoz: O o n o o o o O u o o n Initial rut: 10 u 18 3 O 350 176 651 y c 862 5 User auj: 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 z'no 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1'00 eaF ad1: 1'o0 z'nn 1.00 1.00 z'OO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PRF Volume: '1n o 1e o o 350 176 651 9 z 862 5 noduct vol: u o o n O o o O o n o O Reduced Vol: 10 2 18 2 o aou 176 651 9 2 862 5 PCE'Adj-��-�- ��������v00 1;08 1"0g1.'00 1,00. 1.80- 1-100- 1.00 1-0a -L-00 1.0n mzF Adj: 1.00 1'00 z;nU 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 z'oo z.Ou z,08 z.00 I.V� nivalvmzooe: 10 2 zo 2 8 350 176 ouz e � a6o o ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: looO 1600 1600 I600 zaoo zonu �oon �aoo loon zsno �s00 lsnO Adjustment: 1.00 1'00 1.00 1,00 1'00 z.oO 1'00 1'00 l.on z.oO z'on z,Uo Lanes: 0.32 0.07 0.61 z'nn 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.97 0.03 1.00 I.99 0'01 ' - Final Sat.: `Ix 114 971 zoOo 0 zoVn 1600 szno 42 lsoo 3180 20 | | | _----------- |--------------- ||--------------- 11-7 ---------------| Capacity »oalvaio Module: I� 2u 0 o O cl o sz o 0n 0.27 0'27 Vol/Sat: 0.01 o'ox 0'03 0.00 0.00 ' . ' ' _ ^° + Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THF MOBILITY GROUP FWOP PM Fri Feb 20, 2015 13:41:33 Page 7-1 ---------------------------------- ------------------------------------------ Baldwin Park - FWOP - PM Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #104 Ramona & Badillo Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.622 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 42 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I---------------II---------------II--------------- II ---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SC+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 6 2 9 6 2 241 250 990 11 9 476 4 Growth Adj: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 Initial Bse: 7 2 10 7 2 262 272 1077 12 10 518 4 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 15 0 0 20 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 7 2 10 7 2 265 279 1092 12 10 538 4 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 7 2 10 7 2 265 279 1092 12 10 538 4 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 7 2 10 7 2 265 279 1092 12 10 53B 4 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 7 2 10 7 2 265 279 1092 12 10 53B 4 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.35 0.12 0.53 1.00 0.01 0.99 1.00 1.98 0.02 1.00 1.98 0.02 Final Sat.: 565 188 847 1600 13 1587 1600 3165 35 1600 3174 26 ------ 1---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.34 0.34 0.01 0.17 0.17 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP , rWoP Am Fri Feb 20cozo 13'40:52 easo a -z ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- oaldviu Park - nWoe - my Level of Service Computation Report zzo z(Loau as Cycle Length x) method (Future v"znmo Alternative) intersection ^#1oo*Puente ^a+aauilzo°+°*°°°°+�°**�,^**^*^*+**^+^^°°*+*°^^+*+°°°^°° Cycle (sec): zVo Critical ool'/oap.(z); 0.644 Loss Time (sec)` 10 Average Delay (oeo/veb); uxxxxu Optimal +Cycle: ouLevel ^oz+Service: a++^+ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - r - m L - T - R L - r - R L - c - R ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min.Green: o o n o o O o 0 o O O n r+R«'o 4'0 «'o 4.0 4.0 4.0 «.n &.O 4.0 4.0 «.o 4.0 Lanes: o o z� o o o O �! o o l o 1 z o z o z z u - || || | ------------|---------------||--------------- --------------- -- ------------- Volume Module: Base Vol; 204 94 «u s 107 47 74 349 aeo 69 681 41 mzuvtu uuj: 1'09 1.09 1'09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1'09 1.09 1,09 1.09 1.09 Initial ase: uxx 102 48 s lzs 51 an soV 307 75 741 45 oxueu Vol: o 1 0 o 1 o o 11 o O 8 o easomzoyvoz: o o n O u o 0 V n o 0 o Initial Fut: 222 103 48 3 117 uz an 391 307 75 749 45 ooar auj: 1,00 1.00 1.00 1 0 1.00 1'00 1.00 z'oo 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ear ad1: l'oU 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1,00 1.00 1.00 /.On por volume: 222 103 48 3 1I7 51 80 391 307 75 749 xu Rwduot Vol: o V u 0 o n n u O o n U Reduced Vol: 222 103 oe a 117 51 oo uez 307 75 749 «u �- PCE adj:-- 1.00 1-;00, 1,00 1'4-00 1-100 z.Vu 1.00, z..VU-- 1^GU 1"0Ol,Q9 1.00 ' MLF adj- 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 z'oV 1.00 1,00 1.00 l.$O z'no einwlVolmuite, 222 103 uo 3 117 51 80 zyz 307 75 749 45 ------------|------------------------------ |k--------------- \|--------------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: zsno zenn zson 1600 1600 1600 l6OV �suu zsoO l600 zsno �nVo Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 z.ou 1.00 1'00 z.uo z'Ou 1.00 z'nU 1.00 Lanes. 0'59 n'za 0.13 0.02 0.68 0.30 1,00 1.12 0.88 1.00 1'89 o'll Final Sac., 952 oos uoo 30 1093 475 1600 1792 1408 zGno 3020 180 ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||---------------- |i --------------- Capacity Auazreio mo«oze/ zs o oO 0 zz o �l o Vo V ou n u2 o O5 o Vol/Sat: o.zo u'uy u' 25 0'25 ' . . , , . . , Crit Moves: Tracci^ 8.0'0715 (c) 2008 o"*zion Assoc. Licensed to THE MoozLzTs G000r FWOP PM Fri Feb 20, 2015 13:41:33 Page 8-1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Baldwin Parc - FWOP - PM Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length °s) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #105 Puente & Badillo Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.721 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 53 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I---------------II---------------II--------------- II ---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 -------I---------------Ii-------------II---------------11---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 146 81 82 13 97 29 45 891 169 53 365 16 Growth Adj: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 Initial Bse: 159 88 89 14 105 32 49 969 184 58 397 17 Added Vol: 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 15 0 0 20 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 159 90 69 14 107 32 49 984 184 58 417 17 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 159 90 89 14 107 32 49 984 184 58 417 17 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 159 90 89 14 107 32 49 984 184 58 417 17 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 FinalVol e: 159 90 89 14 107 32 49 984 184 58 417 17 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.47 0.27 0.26 0.09 0.70 0.21 1.00 1.69 0.31 1.00 1.92 0.08 Final Sat.: 752 426 422 148 1123 329 1600 2696 504 1600 3072 128 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------11---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.21 0.21 0.01 0.10 0.10 0.03 0.36 0.36 0.04 0.14 0.14 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP oWoe xa Fri Feb co, 2015 m:«n,sz rage e -z ------------------------------- ------------------�� oaluwio park - rWoe - AM Level of Service Computation Report ICU z(Loao as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection +#zna*Maine ^a*eaz0000e°^^^+°^+^°*^+°°°^^^+^°*°�°�°°°^*^^�°�+^°°°++°^ orczo (oeo): 108 Critical vol./oap'(z)/ 0.390 Loss Time (sec): lo Average Delay (sao/veu)' xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 28 Level Of oozvioe:A^�^^ Approach: North Bound South Bound oast Bound West Bound Movement: L - z - a L - c - R L - c - R L - r - m ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Control: Permitted Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: zuozuue Include Include zoulnue miu' Green: 0 O o O 0 0 O o n O o o z+R: 4.0 4.0 4'8 4.0 4'0 o'o 4'0 4'0 4.0 «.O «.O 4.0 Lanes: o n z z o z n 2 n o n n n n O z O O 0 z ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||---------------| volomo Modulo, Base vol, n 686 11 37 579 n o 0 n 12 o 31 Growth udj' 1.09 z-oe 1'09 1,09 z'oy 1'09 z.Oy z'oe z.oy 1'0* 1.09 1'09 Initial ooe' o 746 12 40 630 o o o n 13 u so Added Vol: o 22 o o 15 o n 0 o o n O paoyezovvoz: 0 o n V O o n n O o n n Initial not: n 768 12 «o 645 n O n 0 zs o su ooez udj; 1.00 1.00 l'oo 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'08 u'OO z'on 1.00 1.00 1^00 eoo Auj' 1.00 1'00 1.00 1'00 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 z'on 1.00 Por Volume: o 768 zz 40 643 0 o O o 13 O 34 aeduot Vol: o O o 0 O 0 O n O 0 O o Reduced Vol: o 7e8 12 48 645 O o o n 13 o 34 eCE-Adj:' -- z�B(�I- 0 0� 1,00- �~oU��.�O' I_W�' 1��D��l.8� l�O8 1100- �.0D. �°uD mLF Adj; 1.00 1.00 I,nn 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 z'Oo l'OU 1.00 1'00 1.00 Finalvoloqe- o 768 12 40 645 O O n u 13 O aA ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Saturation rzm^ Module: Sat/Lane: zVun 1600 1600 znnO 1600 1600 zsnn 1600 zoon 1600 1600 lsnn Adjustment: 1'00 1.00 z'oo z.00 z -on 1.00 z,no z'on z.nV 1,00 1.00 1.00 Laoaa' 0.00 1-87 0'03 1.00 3.00 n'OO 0.00 0.00 0.00 z.Oo o,00 1.00 Final oat': 0 Jzsz 49 1600 3200 0 0 O n Isoo v 1600 ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Capacity aoulvoio Module: » » OV o O 0 VO O o0 n Oo »l O» 0'02 Vol/Sat: 0.00 o'z« o -o« 0.03 - cn - . ' . . ' Crit Monox,°*+°+^+*+^*^*°++°°^**°°^�^°°+°^+*^°**^**+°^°**,*^°^°°++°*°^^°^*°++^^° Traffix 8.0-0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWOP PM Fri Feb 20, 2015 13:41:33 Page 9-1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Baldwin Park - FWOP - PM Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #106 Maine & Palmrose Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.427 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 48 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II--------------- II ---------------I Control: Permitted Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 ------------ I--------------- I I--------------- I I--------------- Volume ----..___-----_Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 692 15 32 876 0 0 0 0 14 0 23 Growth Adj: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1,09 1.09 Initial Bse: 0 752 16 35 953 0 0 0 0 15 0 25 Added Vol: 0 41 0 0 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 793 16 35 997 0 0 0 0 15 0 25 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 793 16 35 997 0 0 0 0 15 0 25 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 793 16 35 997 0 0 0 0 15 0 25 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 793 16 35 997 0 0 0 0 15 0 25 ------------I---------------II--------------- ----------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 1.96 0.04 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 3136 64 1600 3200 0 0 0 0 1600 0 1600 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol,/Sat: 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.02 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.02 Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP pNOP AM Fri Feb 20, 2015 13:40:52 Page 10-1 Baldwin Park - FWOP - AM Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #107 Maine & Clark Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.607 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 41 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R - ----- --------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 11 0 0 ------------ I---_----------ql---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 60 639 13 59 566 45 49 86 59 24 126 152 Growth Adj: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 Initial Bse: 65 695 14 64 615 49 53 94 64 26 137 165 Added Vol: 0 22 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserWo1: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 65 717 14 64 630 49 53 94 64 26 137 165 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 65 717 14 64 630 49 53 94 64 26 137 165 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 65 717 14 64 630 49 53 94 64 26 137 165 PCE -,Add 1...0t�_1..._.0.0_ __1®00. - 1®QQ. I -m_00 1, ,00- I,, 10 1.010- - 1100 f_1.0 1.a0 _ -- MLF Ad. -J, 1.00 1.00 1..00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1...00 1.00 1.00 1.00 j_ 00 1 A0 Fina].Vol e: 65 °917 1.4 64 630 49 53 94 64 26 1.37 165 .___.___._ ..... .... .... ..... ..... I ..__....__._.___.....__. -._ I !..__........ ...._...._._..... .... -._.... .... Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.96 0.04 1.00 1.86 0.14 0.36 0.64 1.00 0.08 0.42 0.50 Final Sat.: 1600 3138 62 1600 2970 230 581 1019 1600 127 668 805 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.23 0.23 0.04 0.21 0.21 0.03 0.09 0.04 0.02 0.21 0.21 Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWOP PM Fri Feb 20, 2015 13:41:33 Page 10-1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Baldwin Park - FWOP - PM Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #107 Maine & Clark Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.604 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 40 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R _----------- I ---------------II----------_---- II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 i 0 0 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 101 551 13 66 800 29 42 89 75 28 75 61 Growth Adj: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 Initial Bse: 110 599 14 72 870 32 46 97 82 30 82 66 Added Vol: 0 41 0 0 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 110 640 14 72 914 32 46 97 82 30 82 66 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 110 640 14 72 914 32 46 97 82 30 82 66 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 110 640 14 72 914 32 46 97 82 30 82 66 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 110 640 14 72 914 32 46 97 82 30 82 66 ------------1---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.96 0.04 1.00 1.93 0.07 0.32 0.68 1.00 0.17 0.46 0.37 Final Sat.: 1600 3131 69 1600 3093 107 513 1087 1600 273 732 595 ------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.20 0.20 0.04 0.30 0.30 0.03 0.09 0.05 0.02 0.11 0.11 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWOP AM Fri Feb 20, 2015 13:40:52 Page 11-1 ------------------------------------ Baldwin Park - FWOP - AM Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #108 Maine & Los Angeles Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(x)s 0.717 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh)s xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 52 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I ---------------II--------------- II---------------II---------------I Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+Rs 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------I--------------11---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 148 655 24 49 487 101 120 290 119 63 605 71 Growth Adj: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 Initial Bse: 161 712 26 53 530 110 130 315 129 69 658 77 Added Vol: 0 22 0 0 15 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 PasserByVols 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 161 734 26 53 545 110 130 319 129 69 661 77 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 161 734 26 53 545 110 130 319 129 69 661 77 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 161 734 26 53 545 110 130 319 129 69 661 77 - -PCE Adj:- 1x00 1:00 1-;00 1:00 1-.-00 - 1:00-- 1,00-1,00__.1-.00 _1-00 1.:00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 161 734 26 53 545 110 130 319 129 69 661 77 ------------I---------------II---------------Il---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.93 0.07 1.00 1.66 0.34 1.00 1.42 0.5B 1.00 1.79 0.21 Final Sats 1600 3090 110 1600 2663 537 1600 2277 923 1600 2865 335 ------------ I---------------II---------------il---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.24 0.24 0.03 0.20 0.20 0.08 0.14 0.14 0.04 0.23 0.23 Crit Moves **** **** **t **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWOP PM Fri Feb 20, 2015 13:41:33 Page 11-1 ---------------------------------------Baldwin Park - FWOP - PM Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #108 Maine & Los Angeles Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.779 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 62 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I ---------------II--------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II --------------®I Volume Module: Base Vol: 137 532 48 63 640 56 116 722 183 41 233 46 Growth Adj: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1,09 1.09 1.09 Initial. Bse: 149 578 52 69 696 61 126 785 199 45 253 50 Added Vol.: 0 41 0 0 44 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 Pa usecB,yV'ol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 149 619 52 69 740 61 126 787 199 45 255 50 user Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PH:F Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume.- 149 619 52 69 740 61 126 787 199 45 255 50 Redunct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 149 619 52 69 740 61 126 787 199 45 255 50 11C.E. Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 MLF'AdJ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolurne: 149 619 52 69 740 61 126 787 199 45 255 50 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.84 0.16 1.00 1.85 0.15 1.00 1.60 0.40 1.00 1.67 0.33 Final Sat.: 1600 2951 249 1600 2957 243 1600 2554 646 1600 2676 524 ------------ I---------------II---------------II--------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.21 0.21 0.04 0.25 0.25 0.08 0.31 0.31 0.03 0.10 0.10 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWOP AM Fri Feb 20, 2015 13:40:52 Page 12-1 ---------------- Baldwin Park - FWOP - AM Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #109 Pacific & Bogart ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.443 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 30 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ____.,..._-1 --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II ---------------1 Control: Permitted Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 ------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 826 28 22 698 2 2 0 2 4 2 11 Growth Adj: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1„09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1,09 Initial Bse: 0 898 30 24 759 2 2 0 2 4 2 12 Added Vol: 0 17 2 6 17 0 0 0 0 7 0 18 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 915 32 30 776 2 2 0 2 11 2 30 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 915 32 30 776 2 2 0 2 11 2 30 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 915 32 30 776 2 2 0 2 11 2 30 -PCE- Adj:--- 1.00,-1- 00 _1.x.00- 1®0.0-1.._00.- -1..0.0- 19.OQ_-1; 0- 1-0-0- 1g_®0 I , 00, 1,00--- - MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 915 32 30 776 2 2 0 2 11 2 30 ------------ I--------------- Il--------------- Il-----_--------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 1.93 0.07 1.00 1.99 0:01 0.50 0.00 0.50 0.26 0.05 0.69 Final Sat.: 0 3090 110 1600 3191 9 800 0 800 418 80 1102 _._...__..--- I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.30 0.30 0.02 0.24 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.03 0.03 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWnOe em Fri Feb oo, cozo 13;41:33 Page zo-z _____________________________________________________________________________ oazdwiu euru - FWop - em Level co Service Computation Report ICU z(L000 as Cycle zeo«tu «) Method (Future Volume Alternative) zotazoeotimu #109 Pacific a Bogart Cycle (sec): zoO Critical vol./oan.(X): 0'515 Loss Time (sec): zO Average Delay (sec/neu): xxuvxu Optimal ovcza' 65 Level of Service: a Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound naat Bound Movement: L - r - n L - T - n L - r - R L - c - a ------------|---------------||---------------| |---------------||--------------- Control: Permitted Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include zooloue Mio' Green; n o o n O O O o 0 o U u r+n: «'o «'O 4.0 «,O u'o 4.0 4.0 *,O 4.0 4.0 4.0 «.o Lanes: o l o 1 O z o l 1 V o o l! O o o O z| o o ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- i| --------------- ||---------------| volume Module: Base vol, n 723 38 «o 1025 7 3 o 5 31 0 cu Growth Adj: 1,09 l'oo 1.09 1'0* l'uy 1.89 1.09 1.09 1'09 1.09 1.09 1,09 Initial ose: o 786 41 oa 1115 83 o u a« o 26 Added vol; u «u y ua 39 o, o o O o o 15 PaaoozByvol: o o V 0 n O V O o o 0 o Initial Fut: O oza uO Oh 1154 8 a 0 5 40 o 41 noez Amj/ 1.00 z-ou 1.00 1'00 z'oO 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1.00 PaF Auj: 1,00 I'OO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 I.00 1.00 z'OO 1.00 roF Volume: o 828 uU 66 1154 8 s o 5 40 V 41 Reuuot Vol: o O n o o o 0 V o 0 u O neuoueu vol: o uou sO ss 1154 o a O 5 oU O 41 PCE Adj: 1.80 1'00 1.00 I'00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1'00 1,00 1.00 z'OV MLF auj: 1^00 1.00 1.00 1.00 z'OO 1.00 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1.08 1.00 Fioazvolume; o 828 50 on zzoo 8 s o 5 40 u «z ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 lsoO 1600 1600 zsOO 1600 1600 1600 zGOn 1800 Adjustment: 1.00 1,00 1'00 1'00 z'no 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 z'oo 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 1'89 0.11 z'nn 1'99 0.01 0.37 0.00 0'63 0.49 0.00 0.51 Final Sat.: o 3017 zna 1600 ]z?o zz snO O z000 786 O 814 ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0'27 0'27 o.o« 0'36 0'36 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.00 0,05 Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP SOP AM Fri Feb 20, 2015 13:40:52 Page 13-1 ----------------- . Baldwin Park - FWOP - AM Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #110 Pacific & Downing Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.510 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 34 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I---------------II---------------II--------------- II ---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 13 761 46 34 634 36 36 8 10 56 16 49 Growt't:. Adj: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 Initial Bse: 14 828 50 37 689 39 39 9 11 61 17 53 Added Vol: 0 19 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Passer.:`ByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 14 847 50 37 713 39 39 9 11 61 17 53 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 14 847 50 37 713 39 39 9 11 61 17 53 Reduct Vol,: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 14 847 50 37 713 39 39 9 11 61 17 53 -PCE -Adj :- --- - 1.00 1-.00---1-.-00 1-00- 1e-00- 1.0.0 1.00 1.00 1,Q0 I.,0:0 2__00- 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 14 847 50 37 713 39 39 9 11 61 17 53 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II --------------- ll ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.B9 0.11 1.00 1.90 0.10 0.67 0.15 0.18 0.47 0.13 0.40 Final Sat.: 1600 3021 179 1600 3034 166 1067 237 296 740 212 648 ------------ I ---------------II--------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.2B 0.28 0.02 0.24 0.24 0.02 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.08 0.08 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWOP PM Fri Feb 20, 2015 13:41:33 Page 13-1 ----___------..--------------------------------------------------------------- Baldwin Park - FWOP - PM Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #110 Pacific & Downing Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.558 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 37 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------- I ---------------II--------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min, Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 --------- �-®I-----y----------II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 6 714 41 50 987 9 13 4 5 85 1 50 Growth Adj: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 Initial Bse: 7 776 45 54 1073 10 14 4 5 92 1 54 Added Vol: 0 51 0 0 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 7 827 45 54 1118 10 14 4 5 92 1 54 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 7 827 45 54 1118 10 14 4 5 92 1 54 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 7 827 45 54 1118 10 14 4 5 92 1 54 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 7 827 45 54 1118 10 14 4 5 92 1 54 ---- -------- I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.90 0.10 1.00 1.98 0.02 0.59 0.18 0.23 0.62 0.01 0.37 Final Sat.: 1600 3036 164 1600 3172 28 945 291 364 1000 12 588 I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.27 0.27 0.03 0.35 0.35 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.06 0.09 0.09 Crit Moves Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP rwop Am Fri Feb oo, 2015 13:40:52 page 14-1 ------------------- ~-------------------------------- ------------------------- � Bazuwiu Park - aWnp - AM Level Of Service Computation Report ICU l<Loso as Cycle Length «> Method (Future volume Alternative) Intersection #zzz Pacific u Big Dalton nvoze (sec)- 100 Critical vnl./oap'(z)' O'saz Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (oeo/vob)' xx,xzx Optimal Cycle: 39 Level Of Service: A Approach: North oovou South 000mt East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - n L - r - R L - r - R L - r - R ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Control: Protected Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include zooluuo zoczoue zoolooe Min. Green: o o o 0 o o o O O u 0 O r+u: «.0 «'n 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4'0 u'n «.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 z z o z o z z o o o z! o O u o 1! o O ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||---------------| vozome Module; Base vol: 77 770 z 7 658 77 162 o e3 3 O G Growth Adj' z'Vo 1.09 1.09 z'ox z'oy 1.09 l'oe z.oy l.00 1'09 1.0e l.oe Initial Bse: 84 837 z a 716 84 176 4 90 3 O 7 Added Vol: o 19 O o xa u o 0 u O O o eassezBvvoz: o o u n u o o o u u u u Initial Fut: 84 856 z e 740 84 I76 « 90 3 u 7 User Auj; 1.00 z'un 1'00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I'oU 1.00 1.00 1'00 1.00 yas Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 I'oo 1.00 I'Ou z'OO 1.00 1.00 eoF Volume: 84 856 I o 740 84 176 u yO 3 0 7 Reauct vol: o o o u O u o o O o o o Reduced Vol: e4 asa z W 740 V« 176 4 90 3 O 7 PCE -Auj -.- -- 1,U0 -1-00 -1,00 -1_00-z_00- -1.00 I-." t -001 -L. -0o- I-08-1-80 L. 0,0 MLF Auj: z'O§ I'00 1.00 1.00 1.00 �.00 z'nO 1.06 1'00 1-00 1.00 1,on Finazvolome: 84 856 I o 740 a« 176 ^ eu 3 o ? ------------i---------------i |---------------- oo--------------- ||--------------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: � 1600 1600 1600 1600 zsoo zsno zsoo z000 z600 z�on lsoo �aoo Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1.00 z.nn 1.00 z'oo z'uO 1'00 l.00 z'oo Lanes: 1.00 1'99 n.ol z'oo 1.80 0.20 0.05 o'oe U'aa n'ss 0.00 0.67 Final Sat.: 1600 3196 ^ laou 2875 325 1041 us 533 533 n 1067 ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0'27 0.27 O'oO 0,26 0.26 0,11 0'17 0,17 0'00 0.00 0.01 Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP nWoe PM Fri Feb uU, uozs 13:41:33 Page 14-1 Level Of Service Computation Report zcn z(zmoo as nvola Length *) Method (Future volume Alternative) Intersection #lIz Pacific c Big Dalton Cycle (vmo)- 100 Critical voI./oap.(X); 8.634 Loss Time (oeo)' zo Average o*zoy (sec/v*u): xoxxnx Optimal Cycle: xa Level Of Service: B agnzoaoh' North Bound South Bound East Bound West a000u Movement: L - r - m L - r - R L - T - R L - z - o ------------ |--------------- |i--------------- ||---------------- ||--------------- Control: Protected Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: zoolouo Include Include zuoluua Min. Green: o o o 0 o o 0 O o n 0 o r+R: 4.0 o'n 4.0 4.0 o'o 4'0 4.0 4.0 «.0 «.O 4.0 4.0 Luoeo; 1 o z z o 1 O 1 z o 0 o zi n o o U 0 o z ------------|------------------------------||---------------||---------------| volume Module: Base vol; oy 054 O « y«7 93 yy 4 91 o u l Growth Adj, 1'09 1'09 1.09 1'09 1.09 1'09 1'09 I.09 1'09 1.09 1.09 1.09 Initial Bse: 53 711 O « 1030 loz 108 o 99 o o 1 Added Vol: z 51 O o 45 n ' o o 1 o n D gasaecByvol' o o o o n O o 0 n n n 0 Initial Fut' o« 762 O « lV?s zoz zua « zOo o o z User udj: 1.00 z'oo 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l'oO 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 PoF Adj.- I.00 z'no 1.00 I'oO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 eaF Volume: z« 762 O « 1075 101 zoo « 100 o o l mouuot vol: O O o o 0 o o o o o o o Reduced vol: s« 762 o « 1075 101 108 « znn O 0 1 PCE u4j: 1.00 1,00 1.00 1- 00 z'oo 1.00 l'OO 1.00 1.00 1.00 I'00 1.00 MLF auj, l'oo 1'00 1.00 z-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 rioalvoluma' yo 762 o « 1075 101 108 4 zon n 0 1 ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||-------------- �| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: zsoO 1600 1800 zoon 1600 lsoo 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: z'OU 1'00 1'00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1,00 z.00 1.00 Lanes; 1'00 2'00 U'on 1'00 1.83 0'17 o'sI 0.02 0.47 O'nO 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 azoO 0 1600 e925 275 ozs »a 755 0 o 1600 ------------|---------------| |---------------||---------------||--------------- Capacity eauzrmis Module: Vol/oat: 0.03 0'24 0'00 u -on 0.37 0'37 0.07 0'13 0.13 n'Vo 0.00 0.00 Crit Move;: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWOP AM Fri Feb 20, 2015 13:40:52 Page 15-1 ------------- Baldwin Park - FWOP - AM Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #112 Cesar Chaez & Ramona Cycle (sec): 100 critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.461 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 31 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I ---------------II--------------- II --------------- II ---------------I control: Permitted Permitted Protected Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 ------------ I --------------- 91--------------- ii--------------- ig-----__--------1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 10 0 34 49 686 36 0 894 7 Growth Adj: 1.09 1.09 1„09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 11 0 37 53 746 39 0 918 8 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 28 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 11 0 37 53 764 39 0 946 8 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.,00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 11 0 37 53 764 39 0 946 8 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 11 0 37 53 764 39 0 946 8 PCE_Adj:- --1rOD-1®00 1:®00 -1.00--1®00- 1-00----1-X00. 1-.-00_ 1-00- _1..00.1-00- 1.0.0 MLF Adj: 1.'00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1®00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 11 0 37 53 764 39 0 946 8 -_----------- I ------------ ---------------II---------------11---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.77 1.00 1.90 0.10 0.00 1.98 0.02 Final Sat.: 0 1600 0 364 0 1236 1600 3044 156 0 3174 26 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.30 0.30 Crit Moves: ** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWOP PM Fri Feb 20, 2015 13:41:33 Page 15-1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Baldwin Park - FWOP - PM Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #112 Cesar Chaez & Ramona Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap-(X): 0.589 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 96 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 ------------I---------------II---------------I(---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 22 0 54 57 1252 0 0 842 14 Growth Adj: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1-09 1.09 1.09 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 24 0 59 62 1361 0 0 916 15 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 0 0 36 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 24 0 59 62 1400 0 0 952 15 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00` 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 24 0 59 62 1400 0 0 952 15 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 24 0 59 62 1400 0 0 952 15 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1„00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 24 0 59 62 1400 0 0 952 15 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II --------_------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.71 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.97 0.03 Final Sat.: 0 1600 0 463 0 1137 1600 3200 0 0 3150 50 ----------- I --------------- II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.05 0.04 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.30 Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWOP AM Fri Feb 20, 2015 13:40:52 Page 16-1 --------------- Baldwin Park - FWOP - AM Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #113 Baldwin Park & Ramona *}****}******************************}**********}**************************}**** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.600 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 40 Level Of Service: B ***********}******************}*****************}**************}*******}}******* Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------11---------------II---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 85 396 112 92 390 126 114 566 10 102 612 36 Growth Adj: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 Initial Bse: 92 431 122 100 424 137 124 615 11 111 665 39 Added Vol: 0 29 6 0 23 0 0 12 0 12 16 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 92 460 128 100 447 137 124 627 11 123 681 39 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 92 460 128 100 447 137 124 627 11 123 681 39 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 92 460 128 100 447 137 124 627 11 123 681 39 - -PCE---Ad j 1-® 00 1 ;.00- ---1--.00- 1:-:700 I n 00 -1-;r-00 1.-a 00 1-.--00 1•.g 00 1-00-1-00- -1-..00 1:.-00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1®00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 92 460 128 100 447 137 124 627 11 1.23 681 39 .... _... .._..... .... _____ _ 1.....__........_____.........__.._ I I__...._....__....._._....___.... I I ----------------- E I _______________ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.97 0.03 1.00 1.89 0.11 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3145 55 1600 3026 174 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- 11 --------------- GI_.. --------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.14 0.08 0.06 0.14 0.09 0.08 0.20 0.20 0.08 0.23 0.23 Crit Moves: **** }*** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWOP PM Fri Feb 20, 2015 13:41:33 Page 16-1 Baldwin Park - FWOP - PM Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #113 Baldwin Park & Ramona Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.867 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 86 Level Of Service: D Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 77 371 216 181 426 84 132 966 46 191 561 67 Growth Adj: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 Initial Bse: 84 403 235 197 463 91 144 1050 50 208 610 73 Added Vol: 0 47 15 0 50 0 0 24 0 11 24 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 84 450 250 197 513 91 144 1074 50 219 634 73 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 84 450 250 197 513 91 144 1074 50 219 634 73 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 84 450 250 197 513 91 144 1074 50 219 634 73 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 84 450 250 197 513 91 144 1074 50 219 634 73 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- {{--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.91 0.09 1.00 1.79 0.21 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3058 142 1600 2870 330 ------------ I ----------- =---II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.14 0.16 0.12 0.16 0.06 0.09 0.35 0.35 0.14 0.22 0.22 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWOP AM Fri Feb 20, 2015 13:40:52 Page 17-1 _®®®®®®m®® Baldwin Park - FWOP - AM Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #114 Stewart & Ramona Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.606 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 40 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R _._.__._..... --._-I---------------II--------------- II---------------II---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 . 1 ------- I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 77 106 105 31 67 50 50 551 41 56 729 7 Growth Adj: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1,09 1.09 1.09 1,09 Initial Bse: 84 115 114 34 73 54 54 599 45 61 793 8 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 16 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 84 115 114 34 73 54 54 611 45 61 809 B User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 84 115 114 34 73 54 54 611 45 61 809 8 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 84 115 114 34 73 54 54 611 45 61 809 8 PCE Adj-: -1-.00 1®00 1-®00 1-:00- 11-00 =11.00 1:00-L.®00--,-1 00 1.00-1.-00 3.-00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 84 115 114 34 73 54 54 611 45 61 809 8 ------------ I ---------------If----------- If---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.27 0.37 0.36 0.21 0.45 0.34 1.00 1.B6 0.14 1.00 1.98 0.02 Final Sat.: 428 589 583 335 724 541 1600 2982 218 1600 3170 30 ..-_..m.._--I---._----- --_till---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.20 0.20 0.02 0.10 0.10 0.03 0.20 0.20 0.04 0.26 0.26 Crit Moves Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWOP PM Fri Feb 20, 2015 13:41:33 Page 17-1 Baldwin Park - FWOP - PM Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #114 Stewart & Ramona Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.646 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 44 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II--------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 40 85 67 25 80 37 100 948 40 82 489 23 Growth Adj: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 Initial Bse: 43 92 73 27 87 40 109 1031 43 89 532 25 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 24 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 43 92 73 27 87 40 109 1055 43 89 556 25 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 43 92 73 27 87 40 109 1055 43 89 556 25 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 43 92 73 27 87 40 109 1055 43 89 556 25 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 43 92 73 27 87 40 109 1055 43 89 556 25 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.21 0.44 0.35 0.18 0.56 0.26 1.00 1.92 0.08 1.00 1.91 0.09 Final Sat.: 333 708 558 282 901 417 1600 3073 127 1600 3062 138 ------ I---------------II---------------II--------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.13 0.13 0.02 0.10 0.10 0.07 0.34 0.34 0.06 0.18 0.18 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWOP AM Fri Feb 20, 2015 13:40:52 Page 18-1 ` Baldwin Park - FWOP - AM Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #115 Merced & Ramona Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.705 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 51 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ____________--------------- --------------- --------------- __-__-----_____� Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------- _______________ --------------- --------------- -_----________-� Volume Module: Base Vol: 139 263 52 72 281 122 108 520 46 29 813 45 Growth Adj: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 Initial Bse: 151 286 57 78 306 133 117 565 50 32 884 49 Added Vol: 6 3 0 0 1 0 0 12 2 0 16 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 157 289 57 78 307 133 117 577 52 32 900 49 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 157 289 57 78 307 133 117 577 52 32 900 49 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 157 289 57 78 307 133 117 577 52 32 900 49 PCE Adj:- _ 1.00 1.00- 3_.00_ 1.00. 1,0® _ 100 1- Q0 1,.00 __ _1_00_ _ 1._00. 1._00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 157 289 57 78 307 133 117 577 52 32 900 49 ____________ _______________ --------------- ---------------II__-_-_-________� Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.67 0.33 1.00 1.40 0.60 1.00 1.83 0.17 1.00 1.90 0.10 Final Sat.: 1600 2676 524 1600 2233 967 1600 2936 264 1600 3035 165 --------------------------- --------------- --------------- ______-----_---� Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.10.0.11 0.11 0.05 0.14 0.14 0.07 0.20 0.20 0.02 0.30 0.30 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWne PM Fri Feb 20, 201-5 13;41;33 Page 18-1 ------------------------------------------ -____~_______---__-___---____--______ Level Of 0orvixm Computation Repoc1 zcn l(Lona as Cycle Length %) Method (Future m*luoe Alternative) ** *^°*^^^^^^+***^+^^*^*^^+^++*A**w°w**m^°^*°****aA°�*a+**+~°°**°**°�+***^^+^** Intersection #zzo oozo*u a Ramona +*++°^^^*++°*+^^+**°++^******+*^*°^**k.*+*^*°^+°**ov�°*°°^*°*^°°°*+*°+��*+**** Cycle (sec): zOO Cziticm% Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.68V Loss Time (sec): 10 Average oelay (se(./veh) xxux^x optimal Cycle: 48 Level Of Service. 14 *^+^^^+~*^*+*****^^°t^*°**+++*****+**+w^m-***+*^*,**°****+°**^°^+k *°***+m*^-* npBzoacb: North Bound South aouu4 East Bound meut Boszoi Movement: L - z - n L - r - R 1, - T - m L - T - o ------------|---------------| |------------------------------� coutroz: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. ozeeu; o o n o 0 n 0 8 8 D Q � r+e: 4.8 4'0 4.0 4.0 4A 4.0 41.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Looao: l O 1 z V I 0 l I 0 1, 0 1 1 0 l V 1 l 10 ------------|---------------| V----------- ----||---------------||---------------k vozone Modula: Base vol: 37 266 so s% soO 41 113 978 132 57 473 oo Growth udj: 1'0* 1.09 1,09 z'ny 1,09 1.09 l.ny 1.09 1'09 1'89 l.oy 1'09 Initial ose; 40 289 67 67 3e6 45 123 IOas 144 62 514 74 Added Vol: 4 2 o 0 s o n 24 s n c« o eqsnerayvul: n O o 0 n n o u n O V O Initial Fut: 44 zyz 67 67 329 oo Ius 1087 zou 62 538 74 onez auj:1.00 1'00 1,00 1'00 1.00 1'00 1'00 1'00 1'00 z'nn 1.00 1.00 eor auj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 z'oO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l'Oo 1'00 rar Volume: ox 291 67 67 auo 45 123 1087 loO ou 538 ' 74 neduot Vol: O 0 n o 0 0 0 n O o o 0 Reduced Vol: 44 cyz 67 67 suy 45 123 zOor zeo 62 538 74 pou auj: 1.00 z'on 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1,00 1'00 mLc adj' 1.00 1.00 1.00 z'on 1'00 1.00 1'00 1'00 1'00 z'on 1.00 l'nn rioozvozume: ux 291 67 67 329 45 133 zOB7 loU dz 538 74 ------------ |---------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 zson 1600 1600 1e00 1600 1600 1600 1600 zoon IsOo 1600 au�uotmeot: 1,00 z'OO l'no 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 z.Vn z.00 z'oo z,uO 1.00 Lanes, 1'00 z'oc 0.38 I'OO 1'76 0.24 l'OO 1.76 0.24 1.00 1'76 0.24 Final aut.: 1800 2598 602 1600 2818 383 1600 2813 387 lsoO 2814 3e6 ------------|---------------| |---------------||---------------||--------------- Capacity Aouzyaio Module: Vol/Sat: O'os 0.11 0.11 n'n« n'zo 0.12 0'08 0'39 0'39 0'04 0'19 0.19 Crit Moven: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP rWop Aa Fri Feb 20, 2015 I3:40:52 nage 19-1 --------------------- _-_____-_________-____________--____-___________________ aazuwin Park - owoe - am Level Of Service Computation Report � zon z(Lvoo as Cycle zeuntu *) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #116 Merced a Baldwin Park Cycle (sec): zoo Critical voz./Cap. (z), 0.663 Loos Time (sec): zO Average Delay (seu/neb)` ^xxxxx Optimal Crozm' 46 Level Of Service: a Approach: North amuou South n"nau East 0000u West Bound Movement: z - r - R L - r - R L - c - R L - r - R ------------|---------------||---------------| |---------------| |--------------- Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected aiouto; zoozpda Include Include Include Min. Green: O o O o o o O o n o V o Y+a: o'o 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 «.O 4.0 4.0 4.0 4'0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: l n 1 z u l 0 l l o 1 n 1 1 0 z U 1 1 o ------~~----|---------------||------------------------------||---------------| volnum Module: Base Vol: 184 uzo 1*I sn 298 103 yo «ao 72 155 592 ou Growth Adj: z'on 1'09 1.09 1'09 1'09 1.89 z'ny 1.09 1.09 1,09 z'oy z'oo Initial o^e: 200 xon zOo uo azx 112 107 472 78 zsy 644 on Added vol: s O n o o s o 35 7 n as o � Paaaecovvol, o o o V o o o o o O n 0 � Initial Fut: 203 455 uou 54 324 115 115 507 85 169 679 48 > / ooec auj- I'nn 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.80 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1'00 PHF Auj' 1'00 I.00 1.00 z'no 1.00 1.00 I'OO l'Oo 1.00 I'00 1.00 1.00 ! raF Volume: 203 455 208 54 324 115 1I5 507 85 loy my 48 ! xemnot Vol: o 8 D O O 8 o o 8 o o u Reduced vol: 203 «no 20e u4 ao« zzo 115 507 e5 zee 679 48 PCE ad2: l°OO, 1.00 1.001-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I-Vn 1.00 1-80 1.00 � xmLF� �;-- 1.00 1.00 '1.00' 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.80 1.00 1.00 1.7[0 1.00 1.00 Finaznmzvme' 203 455 uom 54 324 Iao I15 507 um 189 879 48 ' ------------ --------------- |||---------------||---------------||---------------| ) / Saturation rlmv Module: � oat/Lane: zsoo 1600 1680 1600 I600 1600 1600 zsno 1600 loUO 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 l'on 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1.00 1'00 Lanes: 1.00 1,37 0,63 1.00 1'48 0.52 1.00 1.71 0.29 z'oo 1.87 0.13 Final oat./ 1600 zloo 1004 1600 2362 838 l*no 2739 461 1600 2989 211 ------------1---------------||------------------------------||--------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.21 0.21 0.83 o.zm 0.14 0.07 0.19 0.19 °^°^ o.zz o'zo 0-23 *+** Crit Moves: *^+° ^*^� FWOP PM Fri Feb 20, 2015 13:41:33 Page 19-1 -----------------,..-_W Baldwin Park - FWOP - PM ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #116 Merced,& Baldwin Park Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.765 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 60 Level Of Service: C - Approach: North Bound South Bound task Batind West Bound movement, L. -,T .... R L - T 1R L [, 11 L - T - R ---------- ----------- I I' --------------- I Control, Pormitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include laclude Include Include Min. green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y+R 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4..0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 .1. 1, 0 1. 0 1. 1 0 '1 0 1. 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 75 312 166 31 391 91 100 688 116 217 535 32 Growth Adj: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 Initial Bse: 82 339 181 34 425 99 109 748 126 236 582 35 Added Vol: 8 0 0 0 0 10 6 62 5 0 62 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 90 339 181 34 425 109 115 810 131 236 644 35 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 90 339 181 34 425 109 115 810 131 236 644 35 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 90 339 181 34 425 109 115 810 131 236 644 35 PCE Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 90 339 181 34 425 109 115 810 131 236 644 35 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.31 0.69 1.00 1.59 0.41 1.00 1.72 0.28 1.00 1.90 0.10 Final Sat.: 1600 2089 1111 1600 2547 653 1600 2754 446 1600 3036 164 ------------ I --------------- II ---------------II--------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.16 0.16 0.02 0.17 0.17 0.07 0.29 0.29 0.15 0.21 0.21 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP AM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:32:14 Page 5-1 Baldwin eacb - rwp - AM With Street Closure + Int Realignment Level Of of oezvice Computation Report znn z(Loos as Cycle Length o) method (sotoce Volume Alternative) Intersection 0101 Maine a n«omoa°°+°+*°**°*°°~�°�^**^^�*°*^°*�°**°°°*w*^***m*^°^ Cycle (oen): 100 Critical vol./oan.(n)' 0,887 Loss Time (aeu), 10 Average Delay (aao/veu): xxvxxx Optimal orclo, 86 Level of Service: o * oDecouou: North Bound South Bound East Bound West 000uu Movement: L - z - m L - c - a L - r - R L - z - m ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include zuolnue Include Miu' Green: u U o o o O 0 0 n 8 O o n «'o u.o x.o o'o «'U « n x 0 4 O 4 o 4 o u o 4 r+�/ ' ' ' ' ' ' ' Lanes: - � 0 1 1 U 1 o z z n z o z 1 o |------------|---------------||---------------||--------------- || --------------- volume Module: oaao Vol: 88 548 xz o8 «zs s7 z�s u76 zuU uo 7�a �Vo Growth adj' 1.09 1.09 1-09 1.09 1.0e z.ny 1'09 1.09 1.09 I.00 1.09 z,Uy Initial aao: 96 596 46 96 452 72 125 518 152 96 792 ill A4umu vol; sz ao -? 32 59 sz -za zx o -w g* -26 easserovvol: 175 -26 O o -75 75 os O 139 0 o O Initial rut' ooa soy so 12e 436 17e 133 537 296 so eVs 85 oaoz auj: 1.00 1.00 z'oo 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l'on 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 eor udj; 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1.00 l'OO 1.00 I'un 1.00 1.00 1.00 poF Volume: 382 609 39 1ee 436 179 133 537 296 92 886 85 aeduot vol` U o O u o O n o U U o O meuooeu vol: 302 aOy 29 12e 436 17e zxa 537 296 ou 8e6 05 PCE, auj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 l'nV l'oo z'on z'no 1.00 1.00 MLF Auj, 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 z'oo z'Oo 1'00 1,00 z'ou 1.00 1.00 1.00 rioulvolone; aOc 609 39 zca 436 179 zsn 537 296 92 886 85 ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 ls0o �soO zGoo 1600 z6Oo z60u �GOo Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 z.OU 1.00 z.no 1.00 z,no 1'00 z.uu 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1'00 1'88 o'zz 1.00 z.«u U'oo 1'00 1.29 0'71 1'00 1'83 V.o Final Sat.: 1600 sooy 19I 1600 2270 930 1600 2062 1138 1600 2920 zuo ------------|---------------| |---------------||---------------|\--------------- Capacity aouzy»is o»uuza: Oa O u u6 o u6 O 86 0.30 «'aO Vol/Sat; 0.19 0.20 o'cO 0.08 0.19 0.1 y . , . . Crit Moves: rcazfix o.o'0715 (u) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MoazLzrY maone FWP 1"M Fri Dec 19, 2014 .3.3:33:09 Page 5_1 Baldwin, Park - FWP - PM With atceet Closure and lntersectaon Real'!.gnrnent,: Level Of Service lw01111)utatton Repo:tlw- ICU ;1.(1,093 das Cycle Length Method, (3r't;ature Volume Alt:ernativaa) **W,*A,*kk*..*.,kAA,k*. ^*k kA, k A,***** kA,****tie**k**k*-**&,4*'k'**.*****'**k k * int c:t::aecLLion #101 Maine Ra.Tnona k** -k4 *.k**kk,w*****k k**,**.*��***********a*k***-,*******.k,•*r*ak**.*****�kk****.k k. k. k*.k,*. 1"ycle (sec) : 100 Critical Vol./Cap. ( ) : 1.23:3 Coss 'i°r.rne (,sec) : 10 Average Delay (.saec/veh) : a:xxxx Optimal Cycle: 180 Level O:: Service: ***do-4*.**4k*-*k***'k***4***Ar*,k**A***•*,,**kk***k: *A'k'***r 'k -****,&A4 kk***kkk k A, A, Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement, r, - T -- R 1, R 9, 1, &l ra# rca.__.. Q t ry... _1M,._ .._ tca_1 l: Protea t ed Prote ted Prot d Protected Rights: Include Include 9:r'ar.l�aw.tu. Includo Mian Green; f? 0 0 C'1 0 0 G7 1:l 0 d1 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ 1--------------- --------------- --_______--____��___..... _ _.m......__..,1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 111 457 72 116 617 110 161 1017 186 129 635 100 Growth Adj: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 Initial Bse: 121 497 78 126 671 120 175 1106 202 140 690 109 Added Vol: 56 137 4 67 145 31 46 101 35 6 68 48 PasserByVol: 173 -53 0 0 -124 124 53 0 222 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 350 581 82 193 692 275 274 1207 459 146 758 157 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 PHF Volume: 350 581 82 193 692 275 274 1207 459 146 758 157 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e_Q Reduced Vol: 350 561 92 193 692 275 274 1207 459 146 758 157 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 350 581 82 193 692 275 274 1207 459 146 758 157 ____________ --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- 11--_--_--___---_1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.75 0.25 1.00 1.43 0.57 1.00 1.45 0.55 1.00 1.66 0.34 Final Sat.: 1600 2803 397 1600 2291 909 1600 2318 882 1600 2652 548 ------------ 1 --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- 11---__-___-__---1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.22 0.21 0.21 0.12 0.30 0.30 0.17 0.52 0.52 0.09 0.29 0.29 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP AM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:32:14 Page 6-1 Baldwin Park - uwe - Am With Street Closure + Int Reaziyomeo. Level of Service Computation Report zcn z(coos as Cycle Length x) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection °#zOo+Bogart °a°Ramona °°*^°*°°°^^�°°^++°�°**°�^^�^^^*°+*+^°^+°�^+«+^° Cycle (senk 100 Critical voz./can.(x): 0.555 zmsa Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (oeo/veh), xzxxxx optimal °Cycle: a7Level �oc+Service: A°�°^ Approach: North aoouw South Bound memt Bound West Bound Movement: z - r - o L - z - n L - r - a : - z - R ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||---------------| onutrmz: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: include Include Include zuczoue aio- Green: o o u o O n o 0 V u o V Y+y: 4'0 4.0 4-0 4-0 4.0 4'0 $'o 4.0 4.0 «.o «.o «.o Lanes. z 0 0 z m z u V 1 n z U I z u z O z z o ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- \|---------------| Volume Module: saze vol: 2 24 s 1*6 21 12 xz uuo o 67 703 209 Growth umj: 1.09 1-09 1.09 1'09 1.0e 1-09 z.os z'oy 1.09 1'09 I'09 1.09 Initial use: c 26 7 159 as za 23 565 7 73 764 227 Added Vol: V o s -o n O o 56 -T 1 ss n eaooernyvoz' O o o o n 0 o o o n n O Initial Fut: o xo 12 zss za za 23 ouz 0 74 830 227 User Adj` 1.00 1'00 1.00 1-00 I.00 1100 1.00 1'80 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHr auj: 1.00 1'00 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 0.00 1.0U 1'00 1.00 eoF Volume: x ca 12 155 us 13 23 621 O 74 830 227 aauuct Vol: 0 O O o o o O n 0 n o n aeuooeu Vol: o %s zu 155 23 za 23 621 o r« 830 227 rno Auj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 z-oO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 mLF Auj: 1.00 1'00 z'OU l'oO 1.00 1.80 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1'00 1.00 Fiuulvnzume: u xo 12 155 23 za 23 621 O 74 830 227 ------------|----------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Saturation Flow mmuozm: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 zson 1600 1600 z6oV zoOn z608 znon �6OO Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1'80 I'uo 1.00 z.00 z.no l,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 z'OV Lanes: 1.00 n'oy o'az 1'00 0'64 0.36 1.00 z'nO 0.00 1.00 I.57 0.43 Final Sat.; zouo 1110 «yn 1600 zozn 582 1600 3200 O 1600 2512 aoo ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.02 0.02 0-10 0.02 0,02 0.01 0.19 0.00 0'05 0.33 0.33 Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUt FWP PM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:33:09 Page 6-1 Baldwin Park - FWP - PM With Street Closure and Intersection Realignment ---------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #102 Bogart & Ramona Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.684 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 48 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II--------------- Ii --------------- II ---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes. 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- --------------- ---------------� Volume Module: Base Vol: 13 38 13 166 12 45 41 1045 12 13 627 92 Growth Adj: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 Initial Bse: 14 41 14 181 13 49 45 1136 13 14 682 100 Added Vol: 0 6 4 5 0 0 17 152 -10 24 136 2 Passersyvol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 14 47 18 186 13 49 62 1288 3 38 818 102 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 14 47 18 186 13 49 62 1288 3 38 818 102 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 - 0 0 -0 Reduced Vol: 14 47 18 186 13 49 62 1288 3 38 818 102 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 14 47 18 186 13 49 62 1288 3 38 818 102 ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------� Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.72 0.28 1.00 0.21 0.79 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.78 0.22 Final Sat.: 1600 1157 443 1600 337 1263 1600 3192 8 1600 2845 355 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- 1I --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.12 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.40 0.40 0.02 0.29 0.29 Crit Moves: **** **** k*** *k r* Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FW 2 AM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:32:14 Page 7-1 Baldwin Park - FWP - AM With Street Closure + Int Realignment -Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #103 Downing & Ramona Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.622 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 42 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement. L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T R - -------------{1---------------II---------------{ Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R; 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 -------_--_- I---------------II---------------II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 28 60 31 109 47 9 3 617 36 51 963 95 Growth Adj: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 Initial Bse: 30 65 34 119 51 10 3 671 39 55 1047 103 Added Vol: 17 0 10 5 3 0 0 57 -1 -6 41 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 47 65 44 124 54 10 3 728 38 49 1088 103 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 47 65 44 124 54 10 3 728 38 49 1088 103 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 47 65 44 124 54 10 3 728 38 49 1088 103 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 47 65 44 124 54 10 3 728 38 49 1088 103 ------------ I --------------- II--------- .------ {I--------------- II ----------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.42 0.58 1.00 0.66 0.29 0.05 1.00 1.90 0.10 1.00 1.83 0.17 Final Sat.: 674 926 1600 1055 462 84 1600 3041 159 1600 2923 277 {--------------- {I--------------- II-----_....- _.....--I{--------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.07 0.03 0.08 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.24 0.24 0.03 0.37 0.37 Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP PM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:33:09 Page 7-1 Baldwin Park - pWe - PM With Street czmouze and Intersection Realignment _______________________________________________________________________________ Levez Of Service Computation Report zco z(Loao as ovoze Length y) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #zoa Downing a aaomoa Cycle (sec): IOO orlt±oaz nmz./oap.(x)' 0-647 Loss Time (sec).- zO Average Delay (oeo/veh): xxaxxx Optimal nvoze: 44 Level or oezrioe' e Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound meat Bound Movement: L - z - m L - r - R L - r - a L - r .- a ------------|---------------| |---------------||---------------|1--------------- Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include zmozode znczpao Min. Green: o o n o n V o o o n O U r+R/ 4.0 4,0 4.0 4.0 «'o 4.0 4.0 4'0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes., o l n o 1 o n l! o V z n z 1 n l n 1 1 n ------------|--------------| |---------------(i---------------||---------------| vozume Module: Base Vol: zz oz ze 49 31 12 z 1158 47 zo «uw 37 Growth xuj: 1.09 1'09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1'09 1.09 1.09 1.0e Initial ase' 13 oa 33 oo 34 13 u 12*9 51 11 74* 40 Added Vol: -7 o -13 y o o u 147 zo zU zsy o eaooernrvoI/ o o n o n o 0 o 8 o o o Initial Fut: a 23 zy oz so 13 c 1406 65 21 yza 10 oaaz Auj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 z'oo z'no 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 eop Adj. 1'00 1'00 1,00 1.00 I.00 1.00 1'00 I.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ear Volume: 6 23 19 62 ]o zs e 1406 au ul $13 mo oeuuot vol: u n o o o n D U U o - m m' neuooeu Vol: a oa 19 62 nu 13 z 1406 65 21 913 40 roo ndj: 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 l'oo 1.00 1'00 1.00 1'00 z.QQ MLr Auj: 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Fioalvozomo: s z» zy 62 38 zs u 1406 os 21 913 40 ------------|---------------||---------------| |---------------||--------------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 zaoo 1600 zsoo zsOV zson zsuO 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 J.on 1.00 z'OO z-uo 1.00 z'on 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.21 0.7e 1.00 0.55 0.33 0.12 1.00 1'91 o.V» z^uo 1.e2 0.08 Final Sat.: aso 1265 zsoo 882 ssu 185 zouo 3058 142 1500 snso 135 -----�------ (--------------- | |---------------||---------------||--------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 O'nz 0.01 o.u« 0.07 0.07 0.00 O-ao 0-46 0-01 0.30 0.30 Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROM FWP AM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:32:14 Page 8-1 Baldwin Park - Fwe - AM With Street Closure + Int Realignment ------------------- ----~---------- ---- Level of o°zvino Computation Report zcn z(zm»s as Cycle Length *) Method (Future volume Alternative) Intersection °#zO4*Ramona °a°aauizzo+°^*^*°�°°*°+°+*°^�*°°++��+°+°^*^+°+°+°++°+°»° Cycle (sec): 100 Critical vol./cap.(x), 0.731 Loss Time (sec): lO Average ouzav (sec/vex): xorzxu optimal °Cycle: 54Level *of*Service: c^**+ Approach: North nvoou South aovuu East Bound wast Bound Movement: L - r - o L - r - a L - r - u L - r - R ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||---------------| 000tzoz; Permitted Permitted eroteotau Protected Rights: Include Include zoczuua Include Min. oroeo, o 0 o 0 n 0 o o U o n o x+R: x'O 4'0 o'o 4'0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 v'o «'n o'o 4.0 Lanes: O O I! o n 1 O u z o 1 U 1 1 o 1 O z z u -------~--�-|--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||---------------| volome Module: aaom Vol: 9 2 17 2 0 315 168 589 u o 7o5 5 Growth Adj: z'Ue 1'09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1'0e 1.09 z.oe 1'0* l.ny 1.09 Initial osm: 10 c 18 o o 343 174 Goo 9 o os* 5 Added Vol: O o n * 0 11 zI «u o o 25 V evso*ravvvz; 0 0 u o 0 o o o U 0 u 0 Initial rot' Io 2 zn s o 354 205 682 y z 879 5 nxec Au1: 1.00 l'oo 1,00 1.00 l'OO 1.00 I'00 1.00 1.00 z'nO 1'00 1.00 eeF adj: l'On 1'00 1.00 1.00 z'OO l'oU 1.00 1.00 1'00 l'OO 1,00 1.00 poF Volume: zo 2 18 e o 354 oVs 682 9 o o79 s neuuct Vol: u n o o O o o o U o o n Reduced vol; zu c 18 6 o 354 205 *au * 2 879 5 PCE, auj: 1.00 1'00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1'00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1'80 1.00 1.00 MLF ndj, 1'00 1.00 1~00 1,00 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1.00 z'oO z'oV 1.00 rioalvoluma: zO c 1e s o soo 205 *e2 * 2 e79 5 --------- _-~|--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1680 zsuo 1600 1800 1600 z6Oo z6nn znOo zaoo z�oO zon0 l800 Adjustment: 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 z.00 z.no z'oo z.00 z,Uu z.00 1,00 1.00 Lanes: o'az 0.07 0.61 1'00 0.00 z'uo 1'00 1.97 o -os 1'00 1'9e 0.01 Final oat'` sl« 114 e71 1600 U 1600 1600 3160 «u 1600 3180 oo ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0'01 0'02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.2e o'zs 0.22 0.22 V'Vo o'ca 0.28 Crit Moves, Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP PM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:33:09 Page 8-1 Baldwin Park - Fwe - mm With Street Closure and zotezmaotioo Realignment -__-___________-_-___-____________________-_________-______-_________ Lovez Of Service Computation Report ICU z(Loau as cvolo Length x) Method (Future vozoma Alternative) Intersection #104 Ramona a oauizlo Cycle (sec): 00 Critical vol./Cap-(X)' 0.721 Loss Time (aeo)' 10 Average Delay (aoo/veu): zxrnxx Optimal Cycle: 53 Level Of Service: o Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West eoouu Movement: L - z - m L - r - o L - r - a L - z - a ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include zoozuue Include mio' oroeo' o n u O o u n o o u o o r+R' 4.0 4.0 u'o 4.0 4'0 4.0 4.0 4.8 4.0 «.o 4.0 o'o Lanes, o n z! o O z V o z O 1 o z z n 1 u 1 z u -----------|--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||---------------| vozume Module: Base Vol; s 2 y « 2 241 coo 990 zl 9 476 « Growth adj: z-oy z'oy l -o9 1.09 1.09 z'Vs 1.09 1.09 z'uy 1.09 1.09 1.09 Initial aoo' 7 e 10 7 2 262 27e 1077 lo 10 zlo 4 Added Vol: o n n o 0 ao 88 75 u o zz« o roaoerayVml; o n o n o O O U u n o o Initial Fut: 7 2 zo zn z 327 soo 1152 12 10 632 e naez Auj' 1.00 z'Vo l'nO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 l'ou 1'00 l.Uu 1.00 1'80 gaF Auj: I'Oo 1.00 z'OO 1.80 1.00 l'Un 1.00 1.00 1'00 1-00 1-00 z'on eaF Volume; 7 z 10 lo 2 327 340 1152 zo Io 632 4 mauuot Vol: o 0 n 0 1) O O O 0 u 0 0 Reduced Vol! 7 2 zV to 2 327 240 1152 zu zo 632 * PCE Ad1, 1-00 11.00 1.00 I'Vn 1.00 1,00 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 MLF Auj, 1'00 1.00 1'00 1'00 1.00 1-00 1.00 z'ou 1'00 �1.00 1.00 1'00 Fioozvoz"me' 7 o 10 10 2 327 340 zzao zu zn 632 4 ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Saturation Flow mnuole, Sat/Lane: loUu zeno 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 zaUo zeon 1800 1600 Adjustment: z-oo 1.00 z'on 1'00 1.00 I -UD 1.00 1.00 z'oo 1.00 z'uu 1-00 Lanes: 0.35 0'12 0'53 1.00 0.01 0'99 1.00 1.98 o'Ou z'oo 1.99 u'oz Final Sat.: noo 188 847 1600 Iz 1589 1600 3167 as zson 3178 zo ------------|---------------||---------------|!---------------||--------------- Capacity aovlyuiv Module: Vol/Sat: u,On 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.21 8-21 0.21 u'zo 0.36 0.01 0'20 0.20 Crit Moves: +*°^ Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 200B Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP AM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:32:14 Page 9-1 Baldwin Park - FWP - AM With Street Closure + Int Realignment ------------------------------ ------ Level Of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Entefsection #105 Puente & Badillo Cycle (sec) 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.652 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Opt'imal Cycle: 45 Level of Service: B A, $r ** * * * * a* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * k * * *- * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - r 1,1, L T R _II_ ----------------------- 11 --------------- Con ---- trol: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include include Include Min, Green,: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R,. 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4-0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 - ---------- I --------------- H --------------- --------------- --------------- volume Module: Base Vol: 204 94 44 3 107 47 74 349 282 69 681 41 Growth Adj: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1-09 1-09 1-09 1-09 1-09 1-09 1-09 1'09 1'09 Initial Bse: 222 102 48 3 116 51 80 380 307 75 741 45 Added Vol: 3 2 0 0 7 0 0 43 2 0 15 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 225 104 48 3 123 51 80 423 309 75 756 45 User Adj- 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 225 104 48 3 123 51 80 423 309 75 756 45 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 225 104 48 3 123 51 80 423 309 75 756 45 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 IAO FinalVolume: 225 104 48 3 123 51 80 423 309 75 756 45 I--------------- I I -------------- I I --------------- ~gal urataura Flow Moftle: 00 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Sat/Lane: 1600 '.l600� 1.600 1600 1.600 1.6 Ad j n 5 tine n t - 1-00 1-00 1 - t)() 1-00 "o 1-00 "" "00 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 .00 Lanes: 0.60 0,21 0.13 0.02 0,69 0.29 1.00 J_t6 0.84 1.00 1.89 0.11 i.,'i nal 8 a t. . 954 442 203 29 1111 460 1600 1849 1351, 1600 3022 178 - -- m------- - - I _--.__m_-._ - - - -- -- I I - - -- --- - - - 111--------------- Capacity 1- ------------ Capacity Analysis Module: 11 0.05 M3 0.23 0.05 0.25 0.25 Vol/Sat; 0.14 0.24 0.24 0.00 0.11 0. Crit Moves; Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP PM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:33:09 Page 9-1 Baldwin Park - FWP - pm With Street Closure and Intersection Realignment Level Of Service Computation Report ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #105 Puente & Badillo Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.749 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 57 Level Of Service; C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L T R L T ------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- Volume Module: Base Vol: 146 81 82 13 97 29 45 891 169 53 365 16 Growth Adj: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 Initial Bse: 159 88 89 14 105 32 49 969 184 58 397 17 Added Vol: 9 6 0 0 8 0 0 77 1 0 103 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 168 94 89 14 113 32 49 1046 185 58 500 17 User Adj: 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: IAO! 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 160 94 89 14 113 32 49 1046 185 58 Soo 17 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced: -Vol. 168 94 -,89 714 113 32 49 1046 185 58 500 17 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 FinalVolume 168 94 89 14 113 32 49 1046 185 58 500 17 _-_-___-®®_®I_______________ --------------- -_- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.48 0.27 0.25 0.09 0.71 0.20 1.00 1.70 0.30 1.00 1.93 0.07 Final Sat.: 765 429 406 142 1141 317 1600 2720 480 1600 3092 106 ------------- I I --------------- --------------- --------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.22 0.22 0,01 0.10 0.10 0.03 0.38 0.38 0.04 0.16 0.16 Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP AM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:32:14 Page 10-1 Baldwin Park - FWP - AM With Street Closure + Int Realignment ------------------------------ Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #106 Maine & Palmrose Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.376 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 28 Level Of Service: A Approar'b: North Pound South Bouad East Boond. West Bound Movement* L - T - R T - R L _ T R L - T - R � I {--------------- 1�e rna s q.t,oe�,..Protected Permitted --... [ I _-_ 6 c�ru�u,.Y.ta..:'3�.�. I C.r7����t�°a.& - � Permitted Right's: Ing:lxudcn Include Inc 1Lide Include Min. Greer: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y+R; 4..0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4..0 4..0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Larses: 0 0 1 3. 01 1 0 2 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 [ I ___ -r- _- [ ._.... _-_ - _ I I ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 686 11 37 579 0 0 0 0 12 0 31 Growth Adj: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 Initial Bse: 0 746 12 40 630 0 0 0 0 13 0 34 Added Vol: 0 -22 0 0 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 724 12 40 676 0 0 0 0 13 0 34 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 724 12 40 676 0 0 0 0 13 0 34 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 724 12 40 676 0 0 0 0 13 0 34 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 724 12 40 676 0 0 0 0 13 0 34 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 1.97 0.03 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 3148 52 1600 3200 0 0 0 0 1600 0 1600 --------- --I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.03 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.02 Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP Fwe em Fri Dec 19, zozu za;us'oy nage 10-1 ------------------- Baldwin Park eark - FWe - em With Street Closure and intersection Realignment --------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------- Level of Service Computation Report zco z(Looa as ovvze Length *) m=tuou (Fotqza Volume Alternative) Intersection #zos Maine a ealmzoae nvoz* (sec). 100 Critical ooz./cap. (x)/ 0.450 Loss Time (oeo), zO Average Delay (oec/veu)' xxxxxx Optimal crol*: 53 Level of Service: o Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West anood Movement: z - r - u L - r - a L - z - R L - r - R ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Control: Permitted Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: zuoloue Include zurzuuu znczoom Min. Green: o 0 o o O n o o O o 0 O x+a/ 4.0 4'8 4.0 4.0 u'o 4.0 4'0 o -n 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: o n z z n z 8 2 O o o o o o o 1 n 0 o z ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------| |---------------| vozume Module: Base Vol: o 692 15 az n?s o o o o 14 o os Growth uuj: 1-09 1.09 1.09 l,og 1'09 1.09 1.0* 1.09 l'ny 1.09 1,09 1.09 Initial ase: n 752 zo 35 953 o n n n zu o 25 Added vol: o zzu n n 116 o n n n 0 O o easserayvol: o u o n o n 0 o o D o u Initial mut: o aex zs 35 zosy o o o o is 0 25 User adj' 1"00 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1.00 per Adj: 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.08 1.00 z'OO 1.00 1.00 z'Oo 1.00 1'00 1.00 roF Volume: u e62 16 »n 1069 o o 0 0 15 o 25 oe«oct Vol: O o o o o U n 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol. 0 noc 16 35 1069 O `n m 0 15 O 2�- - PCZ auj; 1.00 1.00 1'00 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.o* 1.00 z:On Mzr auj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1'00 1.00 Fivalvolnme: 0 862 16 so zOoy 0 n m 0 15 o 25 ------------ |--------------- | | --------------- | |--------------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: zsoO zano 1600 zooV 1600 1600 lson 1600 zono 1600 1600 z000 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 z'no 1.00 1.00 1.00 z'oo 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 z'no Lanes: 0.00 1.96 o,n« 1.00 z'no 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: n ozuz 59 1600 3200 o n O O 1600 o zano ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.27 0.27 0.02 n'o» n.00 o.nO o.00 o.oO o.oz o.on 0.02 Crit Moves: °^++ Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP AM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:32:14 Page 11-1 Baldwin Park - FW2 - AM With Street Closure + Int Realignment ---------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length Method (Future Volume Alternative) h,,,rrs ect ion #107 Maine & Clark * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * A * * * * A * * * * * * * k * * k k A k k k Cycle (sec) . 100 Cs" it ic"al Vol. /Cap. (X) 0.618 Loss Time (sec) 10 Averaqe Delay (soc/veh): xxxxxx Optimal, Cycle: 41 Level Of Service: B Approach. North Bound South Bound East Hound West Bound moveme.at * L - T - R L - T L - T - R, L - T - R ------------ __®I --------------- I I --------------- coutrol: Permitted Permi ttr,�d Permitted Rights- Include Incl ud Include Min. Green, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 el -0 4,0 4.0 4.0 4„0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1, 1, a 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------ I--------------- --------------- Volume Module: Base Vol: 60 639 13 59 566 45 49 86 59 24 126 152 Growth Adj: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1-09 1-09 1-09 1-09 1-09 1-09 1-09 1-09 Initial Bse: 65 695 14 64 615 49 53 94 64 26 137 165 Added Vol: -10 40 0 0 24 1 6 -15 0 0 1 1 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 55 735 14 64 639 50 59 79 64 26 138 166 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume; 55 735 14 64 639 50 59 79 64 26 138 166 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 55 735 14 64 639 50 59 79 64 26 138 166 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 55 735 14 64 639 50 59 79 64 26 138 166 ------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- Saturation Flow Module: 1 Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1-00 1-00 1-00 1-00 1-00 1-00 1-00 1-00 Lanes: 1.00 1.96 0.04 1.00 1.86 0.14 0.43 0.57 1.00 0.08 0.42 0.50 Final Sat.: 1600 3140 60 1600 2968 232 6B8 912 1600 126 668 805 ------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.23 0.23 0.04 0.22 0.22 0.04 0.09 0.04 0.02 0.21 0.21 Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0-0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP PM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:33:09 Page 11-1 Baldwin Park - Fwe - em With Street olneoce and Intersection Realignment _-___________---___-____-_-___-_---______-_____-_______-_______-_- Leval of Service Computation Report ICU z(Loss as Cycle Length v) Method (Future vmznma Alternative) Intersection #107 Maine a Clark nvoze (sec): IoO Critical nol./oap. (x)/ 0'626 Luao Time (sec): zO Average Delay (sec/vev)' xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 42 Level of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East 000uu West e000u Movement: L - T - a L - z - a L - r - o L - z - m ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- i| --------------- ||--------------- Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: zoczvue znozoue Include zorzode Min. Green: n n 8 D n o n u O O n o r+a: 4.0 4.0 4-0 4.0 «.o 4.0 4.0 «.n 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 o I 1 o l o z z O o z o o z n o l| n o ------------|---------------||---------------{|---------------| |---------------| mozume Module: Base Vol: znz ooz 13 66 euo xy 42 ue 75 2e 75 61 Growth Auj' 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 z.o9 z^Os 1.09 z-oy 1'09 1.09 1.09 1-09 Initial ase: 110 599 14 72 870 32 4e 97 ao 30 uo 66 Added vol' -o so o z nO 7 7 za o o o z Pamoezovvol; 0 0 o o u o o O o u o o Initial Fut: zou sem Iu 73 eao ss 53 110 au so eo 67 User Auj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 z'uu I-oo 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF uuj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 I-oQ 1.00 1.00 1.80 1.00 1.80 1.00 1.00 1.00 paF Volume: 182 664 zx 73 960 se 53 110 nu 30 90 67 Reuont Vol: o o o o o o » 0 o n O 0 - Reduced -Vol: '102 -664 - =z«'---4r-46g- '=-39'- -`ea -1-10----- B2---- - 30- -9o- --67,-- ---`' -' -� '----- mom Adj.- 1.00 1.80 1.00 I-oo I-oO 1.00 1,00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1.00 z`oO oLF Aujr 1.00 z'ou 1.00 z-oo 1.00 z_On 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 z`pO 1~00 Fioalmozome' 102 6e4 14 73 960 39 os zlo no so on 67 ------------|---------------|f---------------/|---------------| |--------------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1e08 zsoo 1e00 z«OO 1*00 1600 zsoo zaoV 1600 zsVo 1600 Adjustment: I -Vu 1.00 1.00 z-nO 1.00 l -OO z'uo 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I-oo Lanes: 1.00 1.96 0'04 1.00 1-92 0.08 0.32 0'e8 z'on 0.16 0.4e 0'36 Final Sat.: 1600 3133 67 1600 3076 124 519 zonz zaOu 260 765 575 ------------|---------------||---------------|i---------------| |--------------- Capacity Analysis --------------CaeacitrAoazynim Module; Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.21 0'21 o'on 0.31 0.31 0.03 o-zo 8.05 0.02 0.12 0-12 ozlt Moves: ��^� °*++ Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP AM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:32:14 Page 12-1 Baldwin Park - FWP - AM With Street Closure + Int Realignment ------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #108 Maine & Los Angeles Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.724 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 53 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------_----- II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 -----_-____-I--------------- II--------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 148 655 24 49 487 101 120 290 119 63 605 71 Growth Adj: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 Initial Bse: 161 712 26 53 530 110 130 315 129 69 658 77 Added Vol: 3 45 0 0 28 1 0 4 -3 0 3 1 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 164 757 26 53 558 111 130 319 126 69 661 78 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 164 757 26 53 558 111 130 319 126 69 661 78 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 164 757 26 53 558 111 130 319 126 69 661 78 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 164 757 26 53 558 Ill 130 319 126 69 661 78 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.93 0.07 1.00 1.67 0.33 1.00 1.43 0.57 1.00 1.79 0.21 Final Sat.: 1600 3093 107 1600 2669 531 1600 2293 907 1600 2861 339 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.24 0.24 0.03 0.21 0.21 0.08 0.14 0.14 0.04 0.23 0.23 Crit Moves Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP PM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:33:09 Page 12-1 oazu*iu eazu - Fwe - em With Street Closure and Intersection Realignment --------------------------------- _-____--_--_______-_____-____-______--__-___-_ Lmrel of Service Computation Report zo7 z(Loos as crnze Leuocu a) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #108 Maine & Los Angeles croze <aec>: zOO Critical vol./onp.(z): 0.802 Loss Time (sec), 10 Average Delay (oec/neh): xxx^xx Optimal cvole' e7 Level of Service: o Approach: North Bound South oovou East Bound West Bound Movement. L - r - a L - r - m L - r - a L - T - o ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||---------------| omotzoz: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include zooloue Include Include Min. Green: O o o u o n 0 n o O o u r+R: «.o u'o 4.0 «.o 4.0 4.0 u'n 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,0 4'0 Lanes: l 0 1 1 o z o z z o z n z z o z o z z o ------------|--------------- |\--------------- ||---------------- ||---------------| vozome Module: Base vol: 137 532 48 63 640 oa 116 722 zo» 41 oso 46 Growth Aaj: 1.09 1'89 1'09 1'0e z.oe I.09 1.0e 1'09 1'09 1.09 1.09 1.09 Initial ose, 149 578 52 69 aes 61 zoe 785 1e9 «n 253 oo Added Vol: r 66 O z 85 2 z y z« o s z eaoaeraxvol: o n o o o o o o o u o o Initial Fut: 156 644 oo 70 7e1 aa zuo 7e8 213 45 usa 51 ooec Adj. 1.00 I'VO 1.00 1.00 1.00 z'VU 1.00 1,00 1.00 1'00 1.00 z'ou eHF Adj: z.U$ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 z'DO ees Volume: 1,56 6*4 52 70 781 63 12* 788 213 45 256 51 -��4���.���� fL _� � D` OL g _-�a0, 0 U V Reduced Vol: 156 644 57- / � ~ . - - ' ---- - -`-' � -U-���1 - ���-- 22�7�8- -���` -��--���-� -�i----------- - PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.08 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1,00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 z'oo 1.00 Fioazvolome: 156 644 52 70 781 as zua 788 213 os ose 51 ------------i-----+---------| |---------------||---------------||--------------- Saturation rzon Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1e0o zsno zmno laou zsno 1600 1600 �600 16O0 ze0o zao0 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 z.00 z.Oo z.no z.ou z.00 z.oV Lanes: 1.00 1.85 0.15 1.00 1.85 0.15 1.00 1.57 0.43 1.00 1.67 0.33 Final oat.: lsoo 2960 240 1600 2e61 239 1600 uozg 681 zsnn 265e ssz ------------|---------------| |---------------||---------------||--------------- Capacity Aoazxoim Module: Vol/Sat: 0.10 o'za 0'22 o.o« 0.26 0.26 0.08 0.31 o.az o.o3 u.�o O.lo Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FW P AM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:32:14 Page 13-1 Baldwin Park - rWP - AM With Street Closure + Int Realignment __---_-___-________________-___-_-__________-__~___-__-_-__-____-___-_____------ Level Of Service Computation Report zon l(Luaa as cvpza Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection °#I0y*Pacific ^a*Bogart °°°°°+��°°°°°*°�**~�*�^**°*+°^°^w^�*°°^�***°°° Cycle (oac); 100 Critical voz'/nnp. (x): 0.460 Loss Time (sen): zn Average Delay (oeo/veb): xxxxxx optimal *Cycle: azLevel *of°Service: A^**^ Approach: North Bound South aonua East Bound wamt anuou Movement: L - T - R L - r - R L - r - R L - T - R ------------ |--------------- (|--------------- ||--------------- 1| --------------- Control: Permitted Protected Permitted Permitted 'Rights: Include Include zoozode zooloue Min. gzneo: O U V o O O O 0 0 o 0 U r+R: 4'0 *.o o'o m'o 4.0 «'o x'u «.0 4.0 4.0 4'0 «.0 Lanes: o z O 1 O 1 o z z O o O l! o n O o 1! o n ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- | |---------------||---------------| volume Module: Base vol` 0 nzs 28 uu 698 o 2 O o « c 11 Growth Auj; 1.09 1.09 1.09 1,09 1.09 1.09 1'09 1,09 1'09 1.09 1'09 z.oy Initial Bae: O 898 30 24 759 2 u O 2 o u 12 Added Vol: n 34 9 8 57 O o o o 13 o ux rooaecuvvoz, O O u o o o o n o 0 o o Initial Fut: o ysz s* sx 8I6 o c 0 3 17 a 36 ooez au1' 1.00 1'00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1,00 z'no z'Oo 1,00 1'00 1.00 esF Adj' 1.00 z'oO 1'00 1.00 1'00 1.00 l'oo 1.00 z'Oo 1'00 l'oO 1.00 eaF Volume: O 982 39 32 ezG u u n 2 17 u 36 neduot vol: O 0 n o O O O o o V O o Reduced vol: n 932 39 oe 816 z o n 2 17 u sa ecn Auj: 1.00 1'00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1.00 z'oo I.80 1.00 1.00 1'00 1'00 MLF auj' 1.00 l'OO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 Fiuulvolpmo: O 932 39 32 816 x u o u 17 2 36 ------------{---------------||---------------||---------------||--------------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 I600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1e00 I600 1600 1600 Adjustment: z'oO z'no 1,00 1.00 z'oO 1'00 1'00 I'oo 1'00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 1'92 0.08 l.00 1.99 0'01 0'50 0'00 0'50 0.31 o.o« 0.65 Final oat.; n 3070 130 1600 3191 9 noo o 800 500 63 1037 ------------|---------------||---------------||--------------- Capacity omolsaia Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 o'an 0.30 0.02 0,26 0.26 0'00 n'uo 0.00 0.01 0'03 0.03 °*�� Crit +Moves: **^��°*^***+*++°°**�*+w�^*°°°°***+*^�*°°***�+^+��***+*�+*^*°�**~^°°** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP PM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:33:09 Page 13-1 Baldwin Park - oWe - PM With Street ozoanze and Intersection Realignment ----------------------------- _____________-______-_-____~__________-___-_-_______ Lev^z of Service Computation Report ICU l(L000 as Cycle Length u) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #zue Pacific a Bogart oroze <oec>' zOU Critical Vol./oan.(z)' 0.586 Loss Time (sec)-. 10 Average Delay (oec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 102 Level Of Service; A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West oonuu Movement, L - r - R L - z - R L - r - R L - r - R ------------|---------------| |---------------||---------------||--------------- Control: Permitted Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: o o o o o n O 0 0 o o 0 z+u; 4.0 4.0 «'o «'n *'o «.o 4'0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: O z o 1 o I 0 1 1 n O o l! u o 0 O 1| o n ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||---------------| vozume Module; auao vol; o 723 sn uo 1035 7 a O s 31 o u« Growth Adj: 1.09 1.89 1.09 1.09 z'oy 1'09 1,09 z-uy 1.0e 1.09 1.09 1,09 Initial ooe: o 786 41 ua 1115 8 a o u so o os Added vol: u 149 43 34 149 o o o O 31 U oo raaoorByvul: o o O o o n o o o o U o Initial Fut: n nss a« 77 1264 o 3 O o 65 o 74 User Auj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1-00 1'00 1.00 1.80 1.00 eoF auj: 1'00 I.00 l'On 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.08 I-UU 1.00 1.00 1'00 1.00 reF Volume: O yau 84 77 1264 o s U 5 e5 n 74 ;' 0 g U- __Q=-_0 .��_Q�_=�=�0, O'_', - Q_�,'�10", =,"(1, . -, Reduced Vol: A 935 84 77 136* n 3 o 5 65 O 74 PCE Adj., z'nn 1'00 1.00 1'00 z'oO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLa Adj, 1-00 1.00 1-00 I -no 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 z -OV 1.00 z'oo 1.00 oioazmzlxmu ' o gsu 84 77 1264 8 a V 5 65 o 74 �-------~---|--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1e00 z000 1600 zonn zoUn 1600 zsOn Isoo 1600 z000 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l'no 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes, 0.00 1.83 0.17 1.00 1'9e n.nl 0.37 0.00 0'63 0.*6 0.01 8.53 Final amt': o 2935 265 zsoo 31e1 19 600 O 1000 746 n nsu ------------|--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.32 0.32 0.05 o'oo 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.04 0.00 0.09 Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROG FWP AM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:32:14 Page 14-1 Baldwin rack - Fwe - Am With Street Closure + Int Realignment ------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU l<Loos as Cycle zeontx *> Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #zm Pacific a Downing croIe (sec): 100 Critical mmz'/Cap. (x): 0.532 Lpoo Time (sec): zu Average Delay (oen/neh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 35 Level of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound mast Bound West Bound Movement: L - r - R z - r - o L - r - R c - r - o ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Miu' mceou: o U 0 n o O o o V 0 o 0 Y+n: 4'0 x'U 4.0 4'0 u'o 4.0 4.0 *.o 4.0 4.0 «.n 4.0 Lanes: z o 1 1 O z u 1 z O o O l! o o o o 1! o n ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- |1--------------- ||---------------| vxlume Module: Base Vol: 13 761 46 s« 634 ss 36 n 18 56 16 og Growth odj: 1.09 1'09 1.09 1.09 1'09 1'09 1.09 1-09 1,09 1.09 1.09 z.oe Initial aoe' 14 uoo oo 37 689 39 39 9 11 61 17 53 Added vol: O 26 -4 -y 73 o u 8 n 20 o 16 ruseerByvol: o o u o o O o 0 o 0 o o Initial rut: 14 65* *G »« 762 ay yy g 11 81 17 69 ouez udj: l'Oo l'OO 1.00 1.00 1,00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l'oO 1.00 eoF Auj/ 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1100 1.00 I'oo 1.00 1'00 z'oo PaF Volume: 14 854 *s a« 762 39 39 y 11 81 17 69 Reuuot vol: o n 0 n O O n n U V o u Rouunau Vol: 14 ono 48 34 762 ay uy 9 11 81 17 my eoo adj: l'OU 1.00 z -nu 1'00 1'00 z'Vn 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1'00 MLF auj: 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1.00 z'nn 1.00 nivalvozume: 14 854 oo s« 762 39 ay n 11 nI 17 69 __---------- i --------------- ||--------------- H --------------- ||--------------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1608 1600 1600 1800 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1'00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 z,on 1'00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1'*0 o.zn z'oo 1.90 0'10 0.67 o'zo 0.18 0'49 0'10 0'41 Final Sat.: 1600 3036 164 1600 soxo 156 1067 237 2e6 772 166 662 ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Capacity Analysis mmunzr: vmz/aat; 0.01 0.28 0.2e 0.02 0.25 0.25 0.02 0.04 o'o« o-ou O-zo O'zo Crit Moves: °+*+ Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP PM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:33:09 Page 14-1 Baldwin Park - FWP - PM With Street Closure and Intersection Realignment ----------------------------- --------------------------- ----------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #110 Pacific & Downing Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.589 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 39 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II--------------- 11 --------------- 11---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- Volume Module: Base Vol: 6 714 41 50 987 9 13 4 5 85 1 50 Growth Adj: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 Initial Bse: 7 776 45 54 1073 10 14 4 5 92 1 54 Added Vol: 0 195 15 19 161 0 0 0 0 -6 0 -2 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 7 971 60 73 1234 10 14 4 5 86 1 52 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 PHF Volume: 7 971 60 73 1234 10 14 4 5 86 1 52 Reduct -Vol: 0 .0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 7 971 60 73 1234 10 1.4 4 5 86 1 52 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1..00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1...00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 7 971 60 73 1234 10 1.4 4. 5 86 1 52 ------------ I--------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module:: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.88 0.12 1.00 1.98 0.02 0.59 0.18 0.23 0.62 0.01 0.37 Final Sat.: 1600 3015 185 1600 3175 25 945 291 364 989 12 599 ------------ I --------------- 11--------------- II--------------- 11---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.32 0.32 0.05 0.39 0.39 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.05 0.09 0.09 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP awe AM Fri Dec 19, 20I4 13:32:14 Page � 15-1 --- --------- _��____________________--____--____-__-__-________--_-_�------- ---- Baldwin Park - mwe - ao with Street Closure + Int Realignment ___________-________-___________-_-_________-_-____-______--___-______--__-__-__ zevel of Service omwnputacioo Report ICU z<Loso as oroze Length %> Method (Future n"zome Alternative)°°°^°°+°° Intersection KIzz Pacific °&^ Big °Dalton °°°°^°***°°°°+**+°++^**^^**^*°+*^^++^***^° Cycle (sec)-. 100 Critical voz./cag.(u): 0.602 Loss Time (sec): 18 Average Delay <sec/veh>: xxuxxx optimal °Cycle: o0Level *mc*Service: o*��° b North Bound South Bound maoc Bound West Bound uen�oao�; � _ r _ a z _ T - R c � - r - u Movement: | | --| |---------------|\---------------| -|--------------- �------------ ----------- '' Permitted eermit��� ���trol� ��ote��sdPermitted z olnd� mighcu; jRclu�e Include zooIuue U u o O U Min. ozmeu: 0 0 D O O 4.0 O 4 o 4 8 � o u O 4 O �oo s+R� 4.0 4 ' 0 4.0 4. w 4.0 4.0 .0 ^ . , . Lanes: 1` � t 0 1 0 I z 0 � ~ ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- || --------- ------||---------------| v«lom» Module: 77 77O 1 7 658 77 162 o 83 3 o 6 Base Vol: oz»wtb Auj: 1^ ' '^' 0y � »�os z n9 z Oo � '- 0y � n9 z Os 1.89 1.09 1-09 1^09 1.09 o* ' 7 ^ 1 o �6 nw ?* 4 90 s 0 7 Initial na*; o a u o ns o n V » » » V »�ueu vo��� o �o O 0 V o o 0 O O o o ca���r�»vo ' 8* uso l o 809 o4 176 a 90 J O 7 Initial �u�� z �00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 noez xuj� ~ou 1.00 z'Oo 1'80 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1,00 l'nO l°OO 1.00 eov �uj� ~�« n '6O n ' z » os 84 176 u »o 3 U 7 eo� vo�oo�` n O o u n 0 o O o o neuuct vol: '»» 1 n oop nu 176 « go s O 7 �euuoo« Vol: l �a« zz»6«'«» l �0O 1.00 1.00 1.00 z'Oo 1.00 1.00 1.00 1^00 z'oo eo� auj� 'On �� '0O 1 o 'oo �^OO �.00 z,Oo z.oO z'UO 1.00 z'oo rivalvolome: 84 uoo "Og ou 176 4 90 a�� a�i` '«« 'vv ' 3 » 7 || | _-----_-----|---------------||---------------||--------------- -------- _--_--_ Saturation Flow Module: leoo �aon 16oO ls0n 1600 1600 1600 1*00 1600 zs»O Sat/Lae: 160« zm»» on z'Oo 1'00 1.00 z^«O 1'00 z'»o Adjmotmmmt- 1'00 1'00 1`001'001'00" Lanes: 1'00 z'»» 0.01 1'00 1'81 o'19 0'*5 0'02 0'33 0'33 0.00 0.67 Final Sat' : 1600 3196 « z600 c'on ^Oo 1041 26 533 e33 o 1067 \ ------------|--------------- || --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- --------------|\---------------||--------------- nwgaoitv auuzyaia Module: z7 n OO O 28 o ua O �l 0.17 0'17 »'«o ».n« o.»z vwz/oa�` o.oS o.z/ o. ' . ' ' °�°^ cc�t Movon:�*^+x^^^+~*°'�+^°+*°^°°,�^°,�°*�~«*^°a°"**++°*°^�+°^*^^^°^+�+^+^^^+°� Traffix 8.0-0715 (c) 2008 Dowling ASSOC. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP PM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:33:09 Page 15-1 Baldwin Park - FWP - PM With Street Closure and Intersection Realignment Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #111 Pacific & Big Dalton Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.669 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 46 Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I ---------------II--------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Protected Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 �.............•...�_ �� .......--I --------------- I I--------------- I I--------------- I I--------------- I Volume Module: Base Vol: 49 654 0 4 947 93 99 4 91 0 0 1 Growth Adj: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.,09 1.09 Initial Bse: 53 711 0 4 1030 101 108 4 99 0 0 1 Added Vol: 1 210 0 0 156 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 54 921 0 4 1186 101 108 4 100 0 0 1 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 PHF Volume: 54 921 0 4 1186 101 108 4 100 0 0 1 Reduct Vo,4: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Ae uc'd.. Vo.1: 54 921 0 4 1186 101 108 4 1Q1Q;u 0 0 1. - - PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.,00 1:00 1.00 :q..00 1..00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1..00 1..00 1..1b0 1 .400 FinalVolume: 54 921 0 4 1186 101 108 0 100 0 0 1 ------------ I--------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 1.84 0.16 0.51 0.02 0.47 0.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 0 1600 2949 251 813 33 755 0 0 1600 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- 11---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.40 0.07 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** FWP AM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:32:14 Page 16-1 Baldwin Park - rWe - mm With Street Closure + Int Realignment -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lavel Of Service Computation Report ICU z(Loso as Cycle Length x) Method (Future Volume Alternative) �utec�e��ion *#112�Cesac*Cbaez+*Rmmmoa°~**~v*�°^°**^**++*ww*+*^^*�*°°*^°+^**m°w* °~. ..~~ , ,-' ' �:,yclw (sec); 100 Critical Vol, /Cap. (X)/ 0.662 Loos Time (,Sao); 10 ��e��ge mel�y {meoyva�)` mxzxxx Optimal Cycle; 46 Leval of Seuvice:o«*°^ **+^»°^°****~mk Oe **+****A,*****^*°^*****^+^**mw°*°°°," - ApDzmacll: �mmctbTBuuud� �- aoath�Pound � 1,Eaat�Bound e ��pmtrHounda Mmvmmeo�~ ' - - - | ||---------------| __--_-------U---------------1|---------�-----| --------------- C,ofit rol; ge.1'311itte4 Permitted Protected Perm 1tted oiglita; Include Include zmt'Jurle Incl odm Min. Green: Q O Q 0 0 Q M 0 Q 4 � 4.0 4.0 4.0 4 n 4 O 4.0 4,g 4.Q 4.0 4.0 4.0 "=°= ��m�m; �' 0 ^ - 1 ' 1^ 0 ^ l ' 1 0 �| -| |---�-----------| __~-____---�|---------------�|---------~---- -------------- Volume Module: Base vol: -- s �o 85 10 O 34 «y 606 26 64 780 7 Growth udj: l.'' I'O» s 1.09 1'09 1'09 1.09 z.Oy 1.09 1.09 1'09 1.09 1.09 c 9u 11 O 37 53 659 39 ?O 848 o Initial aae� �/ - audau vol: x v s ll o o 48 6 1 12 136 » eaosacovvol: o O zoa o u o o O O 179 71 U Initial rut: us o zso o o 37 101 665 «o 261 1055 n User Auj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1'00 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.00 eHF Auj: 1'OO 1'00 z'OO 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 z'UD 1'00 1.00 1.00 eoF Volume; '25 o e66 o o 27 101 665 «o xsz 1055 n aeuuot Vol: 0 o n o o n n o o o 0 n uednonu vol: 25 O 266 o o 37 101 665 «O 261 1055 8 PCE uuj' 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.08 z^oo 1'00 1.00 MLF Auj: 1.00 1.00 1'00 0'00 1.00 1.00 z'OV 1'00 1,00 1.00 1'00 1,00 Fio^lvoluuo: eu O 266 0 O 37 101 665 xo 261 1055 8 ------------ |--------------- |i--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Saturation Flow Module: z�oo �6On zsoo �6Oo 1600 1600 1600 zson zsOn 1600 Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 .^ Adjustment: l'oo 1'00 1�Vn Uo 1-00 1-00 1-00 1-00 1-00 1'00 1.00 z.«O . Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1'00 o'on 1'00 1.00 1'89 0.11 1.00 1.99 0.01 ' Final Sat.: 1' -nn O 1800 1600 o 1600 1600 3018 182 1600 3177 23 ------------ |--------------- |\--------------- || ------------- --||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: �� o oo 0 oo 0. Ou o U6 o uu o zz o.zs 0,33 0.33 Vol/Sat; 0.02 0.00 u' . ' . . . Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling ASSOC. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP PM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:33:09 Page 16-1 Baldwin Park - FWP - PM With Street Closure and Intersection Realignment Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #112 Cesar Chaez & Ramona Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.853 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 180 Level 0£ Service® D ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II----- ,---------- II --------------- II -----_-----___- Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I --------------ll------------------------------11---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 2 0 111 22 0 54 57 1220 43 94 748 14 Growth Adj: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 Initial Bse: 2 0 121 24 0 59 62 1327 47 102 813 15 Added Vol: 10 0 3 -5 0 0 25 191 13 19 177 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 274 0 0 0 0 0 0 217 81 0 Initial Fut: 12 0 398 19 0 59 87 1518 60 338 1071 15 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 12 0 398 19 0 59 87 1518 60 338 1071 15 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 12 0 398 19 0 9 87 1.518 60 338 1071 15 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1'. 00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1..00 1..00 FinalVolume: 12 0 398 19 0 59 87 1518 60 338''1071 15 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II --------_-_----I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.92 0.08 1.00 1.97 0.03 Final Sat.: 1600 0 1600 1600 0 1600 1600 3079 121 1600 3155 45 I-------------1 1--------------- I --------------- I I-_-----_-----_- I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.00 0.25 0.01 0.00 0.04 0.05 0.49 0.49 0.21 0.34 0.34 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP mae AM Fri Der zB, 2014 za:3a:z«________________Page 17-1 -_-_-_-_-___-_-___-_---~-_____-_____________--- ---- Baldwin eacx - oWe - AM With Street Closure + Int Realignment ______-_-__-_______-______--___---____-___-__________-______ Levez of Service computation Report zoz 1(Loso as Cycle Length x) Method (Future Volume Altecoatine)��*°°°°�* intersection 4113 Baldwin Park a Romoua*°°*�***°°+°*�*+°^°^^*^�°�°°�°*°+***+*°°^ cycle (sec): / I00 Critical voz'/tnp.(z): 0'651 �oo� Time �o*o>' zO Average o*zas (oeo/veu}� xrx�xz B Optimal °Cycle: «5Level °oc,Service: �+**�+°^*�**�***^+°^°^ � n mo��� eoo�a � r u �� South a000u mast Bound West Bound mppzomc : _ _ Movement: - T - _|_-_______------��---------------|A--------------- ----�--- ----------- d Protected szn��nte Cent Permitted necml�ted � Include zm��u� ��e zo�om zoclude ���bc�: 0!0 O g m 8 0 o 0 0 0 0 ���' ���ep� 4.0 4.0 4 O 4,0 4.0 4-0 4'8 4.0 4'8 4.0 8.0 4^0 c�paa� �+�: 1' W ^ 2 0 ~ ^ �~ 0 2 O z l O I z 0 l O I 1 0 --------| ------------ |--------------- ||-------------- -||--------------||-----� -- Volume Module: Ro 39e oz yu 390 126 zzu uaa zQ zuu 612 36 Base Vol: uy z O9 z us � oo z.us 1.89 1-8e 1'09 1.09 1.09 IOs zug z ^ Growth Adj: ^ ` ' ' 'a7 �2a 6�� 11 111 6e5 39 Initial soe: 92 a *31 zu 122 og ^u8 _2 424 o7 --z -2 zz O sm 75 18 Auumu Vol;z u » O o 0 n V o O 71 o o eaamerBYvo � 98 453 151 ne «ez zse 122 e37 zz 234 740 mo zui�i�� ro�� � zoO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 oa�c xu/ � 'no 1.00 z'� - -Oo l''oo z`oV z'oo 1.00 1.00 l'uo 1.00 1.00 1.00 ear ��j� ^me 'u3 '�z e8 mz sa 122 637 zz 234 740 55 eer vozu��� n o o o u u o o o o « 0 memuo� Vol: 98 453 zoz 98 451 zas 122 637 zz 234 740 55 Reduced Vol: on 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 z'oo I'oo e�m �mj/ I z'oo 1'oO �'�o z'oo z'o0 z'oo z'nU z.o8 z' �rr�uj' ' ' ' ' ' ' ou z'On 1.00 1.00 zz o3a 7«0 s» Fi zv z���` �53 I51 9a o5� lys zoo 637 �a s/ o "" || | ------------ 1 --------------- ||--------------- -----�-- _---�--�|--------------- Saturation Flow Module: 3,60011600 ���V 160$ l6VU ���0 1�V� ��� 1600 160$ 1600 Sat/Lane: 1600 zmou 1600 00 �1.010_ | 1`00 I^00 1~00 Adjustment: 1^00 z'uu 1`00 1^00 O Lanes: 1'00 c'»» 1^00 J_ 00 2~00 1'.00`Vb l^�QO 1^97 0-03 1^00 1^86 0.14 Final Sat,: 1600 3200 1600 1*8Q ]+ 0o l"0O 1,600 3146 5�4 1600 2978 222 ------------|--------------- I i---------------- Capacity- Analysis mwuoze: u6 O z* n O9 0 oa n 2o 0'20 0.15 0.25 8'25 mmI/a��� 0.oe o,zo o.o9 n . . ' , +��° ^^°^ Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 200B Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP PM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:33:09 Page 17-1 Baldwin Park - FWP - PM With Street Closure and Intersection Realignment Level Of Service Computation Report ~- -- ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #113 Baldwin Park & Ramona Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.036 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: F Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II --------------- 11---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4„0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I -------------II---------------II--------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 77 371 216 181 426 84 132 966 46 191 561 67 Growth Adj: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 initial. 1-33e: 84 403 235 197 463 91 144 1050 50 208 610 73 Added Vo.I; 5 75 76 29 71 1 5 119 0 62 100 24 passe Byvol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 81 0 0 Initial Fut: 89 478 31.1 226 534 92 149 1169 50 351 710 97 User Adj- 1100 1.00 .1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PH,F Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1''11.1^,"' 'V'o1uine: 89 478 311, 226 534 92 149 1169 50 351 710 97 Reduct 0 0 Vol:0 0 - - - -0 0 0 -0 - 0 - 0 -- ---_Q _ _ 0 Reduawt < `Vol $9- 47�- -3 1 226 534 92 149 1169 50 351 710 97 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 89 478 311 226 534 92 149 1169 50 351 710 97 ------------ I--------------- fl--------------- II--------------- II ----_-_--------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.92 0.08 1.00 1.76 0.24 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3069 131 1600 2816 384 -----------_I---------------II--------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.15 0„19 0.14 0.17 0.06 0.09 0.38 0.38 0.22 0.25 0.25 Crit Moves **** **** **a** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 200 Dowling Assoc. Licensedo THE MOBILITY EMP AM Fri Dec 19® 2014 13:32:14 Page 18-1 -----------------.------------------ Baldwin Park - FWP - AM with Street Closure + Int Realignment ---------- ®---------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #114 Stewart & Ramona Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.625 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 42 Level Of Service: B Approach: N0,17th Bound South Bound East Bound L WestBound Movement: T - R T,, I" R L "L _R Control: P ._-_--- I ___ ._- .w�.l I __,... --------------- I rmitC ed J. erm fitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Inolude Include Include Min. Green: 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 d 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4,„0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 ..----_----- p -_ a-_._ _ 0 0 1 1 f -- - 1 _gym I I --------------- I Lanes: 0 0 ]',___-_ Volume Module: 77 106 105 31 67 50 50 551 41 56 729 7 Base Vol: Growth Adj: 1.77 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 Initial Bse: 84 115 114 34 73 54 54 599 95 61 793 0 0 2$ 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 84 115 114 34 73 54 54 627 45 61 869 8 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 84 115 114 34 73 54 54 627 45 61 869 80 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 84 115 114 34 73 54 54 627 45 61 869 8 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 84 115 114 34 73 54 54 627 45 61 869 8 II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.27 0.37 0.36 0.21 0.45 0.34 1.00 1.87 0.13 1.00 1.98 0.02 583 335 724 541 1600 2988 212 1600 3172 28 Final Sat.: 428 58g.__ _. II_.m-_..-----------II--------------- II--------------- I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.20 0.20 0.02 0.10 0.10 0.03* 0.21 0.21 0.04 0.2*77 0.27 Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP PM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:33:09 Page 18-1 Baldwin Park - FWP - PM With Street Closure and Intersection Realignment Level Of Service Computation Report -- _ - ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #114 Stewart & Ramona Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.681 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 48 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II ---------_-----I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes- 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 40 85 67 25 80 37 100 948 40 82 489 23 Growth Adj: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 Initial Bse: 43 92 73 27 87 40 109 1031 43 89 532 25 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 136 0 0 103 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 43 92 73 27 87 40 109 :1.167 43 89 635 25 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1600 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 43 92 73 27 87 40 109 1167 43 89 635 25 Rpciuct Vol. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol. 43 92 73 27 87 40 109 1167 43 89 635 25 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 '1.00 1.00 MLF Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FipalVolume: 43 92 73 27 87 40 109 1167 43 89 635 25 ------------I---------------II---------------11---------------11---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.21 0.44 0.35 0.18 0.56 0.26 1.00 1.93 0.07 1.00 1.92 0.08 Final Sat.: 333 708 558 282 901 417 1600 3085 115 1600 3079 121 ------------I---------------11---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.13 0.13 0.02 0.10 0.10 0.07 0.38 0.38 0.06 0.21 0.21 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FW P AM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:32:14 Page 19-1 Baldwin Park - awe - Am With Street olmmoze + Int Realignment ------------------------------------------------------- _-___-_______-_____--_-__ Lenel of Service Coimpntation Report ICU 1(Loas as Cycle Length m) Method (Future Volume Alternative) °*°^°*^°+ Intersection °#zzs°Merced ^a°Ramona °°°°°*+°^*°++^�^°«�*^^^°++°*^^°*^^+°^°°�+�+^��� orzze (sec): zOO Critical vol./nap.(x): 0-724 Loss Time (sec): lO Average Delay (seo/vob} : uxxxnx Optimal +Cycle: 5aLevel °nf+Service: o^^°° Approach: North Bound $(-mth Bound �as,t Bound West ennuu Movement. L - T _ it T - e �L _ T ____------- I---------------\ i---------------\ U---------------||---------------| Cmntcol: protected Protected Protected Protected Rights; Include Include I n,c%pde znczwio Miq^ Green: O 0 Q 0 0 0 0 U O O V O Y+Rx^ ' ^ ^ ^ ^ * � t O N � � 0 $ 8 � 0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 Q 1.l O 1 O 1 8 l l O 1 8 1 l || | __~-_---~~-~[___-----I.------.--- |�---------------I |-~------------- --------------- Volume Module: z3n 263 su 7x 281 121 108 520 46 29 813 45 Base Vol: .^.. Growth xdj, z zos 2n9 lao n9 1-09 1-09 1-09 1-09 1-09 1-09 z.Oy 1.09 .oy Initial ase: 151 u� ''- 57 78 ana Iss 117 e65 50 32 884 «y auueu Vol: s 3 a o z O o 25 c 2 74 U raaoeroyvoz: O O n o O o 0 o o 0 0 O Initial out: 157 289 60 78 307 zas 117 soO 52 34 958 49 nsoc Auj; 1.00 1'00 1.00 I'nO z'oo 1'00 1.00 1.00 I'00 1'00 1.00 1.00 ean xuj: z'oO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1,00 I'OO 1'00 1.00 1.00 - eeF Volume: 'n7 289 60 78 307 133 1I7 590 52 ao eyo xe noduot Vol: n 0 n 0 o o U o n 0 O O Reduced Vol: zsr 289 ao 78 307 133 117 5*0 52 s« 958 «y PCF Adj: 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1.00 z -on 1'00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLr auj: 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 z'nU 1.00 1'80 1.00 z'no 1,00 - Fivazvozomo; '57 289 60 78 307 133 117 590 oc 34 958 «y || ||| ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ------------- ----------------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 16on 1600 zanO 1600 1600 1600 zsUU 1e00 zson 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1'00 l.UO 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: z'Oo 1.86 0.34 1.00 1.40 0'60 1.00 1.84 0'1* 1.00 1.e0 O'zo ' Final Sat.: z''on 2653 547 1800 2233 867 1600 2e41 259 1600 ao«s 155 }| ||i ------------|---------------||--------------- --------------- --------------- Capacity Auazraim Module: zz n O� O zu O z« o n7 o 2o o en n'O2 0'3I 0'31 Vol/Sat: u.lo o.z� o. ' . ' ' , ' ^°«^ Crit °Moves: °°+°+°+*°�°»*°*^�+^*°+*^^°°°*°***++°*°*^��++*^+**^*°^+°+*�°^°*^°*°°^� Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP PM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:33:09 Page 19-1 Baldwin Park - FWP - PM With Street Closure and Intersection Realignment -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #115 Merced & Ramona Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.717 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 52 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I ---------------II--------------- II---------------II---------------I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------I---------------11---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 37 266 62 62 300 41 113 978 132 57 473 68 Growth Adj: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 Initial Bse: 40 289 67 67 326 45 123 1063 144 62 514 74 Added Vol: 4 2 5 0 3 0 0 131 6 4 99 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 44 291 72 67 329 45 123 1194 150 66 613 74. User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PRF Adj: 1.,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PT4F Volwite: 44 291 72 67 329 45 123 1194 150 66 613 74 Redact, Veal: 1) 0 0 0 _ -0- 0 __0 0 0 -<0 0 0 - Reduced '�dl„ 44 291 72 67 329 45 123 1194 150 66 613 74 PCE Adj 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 F:inalVolume: 44 291 72 67 329 45 123 1194 150 66 613 74 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.60 0.40 1.00 1.76 0.24 1.00 1.78 0.22 1.00 1.78 0.22 Final Sat,: 1600 2563 637 1600 2818 382 1600 2844 356 1600 2856 344 ------------I---------------II---------------11---------------11---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.11 0.11 0.04 0.12 0.12 0.08 0.42 0.42 0.04 0.21 0.21 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP AM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:32:14 Page 20-1 Baldwin Park - FWP - AM With Street Closure + Int Realignment ------------------------------------- Level of Service Computation Report ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length %) method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #116 Merced & Baldwin Park Cycle (sec); 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.677 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 47 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L T R L T ------------ --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- Volume Module: 98 434 72 155 592 44 Base Vol: 184 418 191 50 298 103 Growth Adj: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1-09 1-09 1-09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 Initial Bse: 200 455 208 54 324 112 107 472 78 169 644 48 Added Vol: 3 3 9 0 2 3 8 45 7 7 80 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 203 458 217 54 326 115 115 517 85 176 724 48 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 203 458 217 54 326 115 115 517 - 85 176 724 48 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 203 458 217 54 326 115 115 517 85 176 724 48 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 203 458 217 54 326 115 115 517 85 176 724 48 ------------ I -II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation --------------- --------------- --------------- Saturation Flow Module: 1600 1600 1600 1600 Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1-00 1-00 1-00 1-00 1-00 1-00 1-00 1-00 Lanes: 1.00 1.36 0.64 1.00 1.46 0.52 1.00 1.72 0.28 1.00 1.98 0.12 Final Sat.: 1600 2172 1028 1600 2366 834 1600 2747 453 1600 3002 198 ------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.21 0.21 0.03 0.14 0.14 0.07 0.19 0.19 0.11 0.24 0.24 Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0-0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP PM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:33:09 Page 20-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Baldwin Park - FWP - PM With Street Closure and Intersection Realignment ------------------------------------------------ --------- --------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #116 Merced & Baldwin Park Cycle (sec)- 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.803 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 67 Level Of Service: D Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --- -------- I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 75 312 166 31 391 91 100 688 116 217 535 32 Growth Adj: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 Initial Bse: 82 339 181 34 425 99 109 748 126 236 562 35 Added Vol: a 5 9 0 4 10 6 157 5 12 130 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 90 344 190 34 429 109 115 905 131 248 712 35 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 90 344 190 34 429 109 115 905 131 248 712 35 Reduct Vol: 0 0 Q 0 0 a 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 96 34-4 10 34 429 109 115 905 131 248 712 35 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume; 90 344 190 34 429 109 115 905 131 248 712 35 ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1.600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.29 0.71 1.00 1.60 0.40 1.00 1.75 0.25 1.00 1.91 0.09 Final Sat.: 1600 2064 1136 1600 2552 648 1600 2795 405 1600 3051 149 ------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.17 0.17 0.02 0.17 0.17 0.07 0.32 0.32 0.15 0.23 0.23 Crit Moves: ***4, Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP AM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:39:39 Page 4-1 Baldwin Park - EWP - AM With Street Closure + Int Realignment ______________ - Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #101 Maine & Ramona ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.792 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 65 Level Of Service: C Approach: [forth Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I ---------------II--------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 88 548 42 88 416 67 115 476 140 88 728 102 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 8B 548 42 88 416 67 115 476 140 88 728 102 Added Vol: 17 17 -7 32 44 31 -18 10 -3 -4 80 -26 PasserByVol: 161 -24 0 0 -69 69 24 0 128 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 266 541 35 120 391 167 121 486 265 84 808 76 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 266 541 35 120 391 167 121 486 265 84 808 76 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 266 541 35 120 391 167 121 486 265 84 808 76 --------------- --------------- 11---------------11-------____---=V Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.88 0.12 1.00 1.40 0.60 1.00 1.29 0.71 1.00 1.83 0.17 Final Sat.: 1600 3006 194 1600 2242 958 1600 2071 1129 1600 2925 275 ------------ I ---------------II--------------- II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.17 0.18 0.18 0.08 0.17 0.17 0.08 0.23 0.23 0.05 0.28 0.28 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP PM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:40:11 Page 4-1 Baldwin Park - EWP - PM With Street Closure and Intersection Realignment -----------------------_--------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #101 Maine & Ramona Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.117 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: F Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------------------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11---------------� Control-. Protected Protected Protected Protected Right -„s, Include Include Include Include Minn. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane..,,q : 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 -- -_-.. -- --------------- --------------- --------------- Vo:l.ume Module: Ba5e; Vol: 111 457 72 116 617 110 161 1017 186 129 635 100 Growth Adj., 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Bs: 111 457 72 116 617 110 161 1017 186 129 635 100 Added Vol: 40 96 4 67 102 31 46 81 16 6 49 48 PassarByVol.: 159 -49 0 0 -114 114 49 0 204 0 0 0 Initi�n1L tut- 310 504 76 183 605 255 256 1098 406 135 684 148 User Add: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P11F Ad_D: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 310 504 76 183 605 255 256 1098 406 135 684 148 Reduct- Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol.: 310 504 76 183 605 255 256 1098 406 135 684 148 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 310 504 76 183 605 255 2.56 1098 406 135 684 148 --_----_---- I --------------- --------------- --------------- _--------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.74 0.26 1.00 1.41 0.59 1.00 1.46 0.54 1.00 1.64 0.36 Final Sat.: 1600 2781 419 1600 2251 949 1600 2336 864 1600 2631 569 ------------ I--------------- --_---_-------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.19 0.18 0.18 0.11 0.27 0.27 0.16 0.47 0.47 0.08 0.26 0.26 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP AM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:39:39 Page 5-1 Baldwin Park - EWP - AM With Street Closure + Int Realignment ------__---------------------------------__.._----------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #102 Bogart & Ramona Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.523 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 35 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I---------------II---------------II----------------II---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- If ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 2 24 6 146 21 12 21 520 6 67 703 209 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 2 24 6 146 21 12 22 520 6 67 703 209 Added Vol: 0 0 2 -4 0 0 0 46 -7 0 52 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 2 24 8 142 21 12 21 566 -1 67 755 209 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.100 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 2 24 8 142 21 12 21 566 0 67 755 209 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 2 24 8 142 21 12 21 566 0 67 755 209 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.,00 1..00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 2 24 8 142 21 12 21 566 0 67 755 209 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.75 0.25 1.00 0.64 0.36 1.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 1.57 0.43 Final Sat.: 1600 1200 400 1600 1018 582 1600 3200 0 1600 2506 694 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.09 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.18 0.00 0.04 0.30 0.30 Crit Moves Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP P PM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:40:11 Page 5-1 Baldwin Park - EWP - PM With Street Closure and Intersection Realignment Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection *102 Bogart & Ramona Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.632 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 43 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L T R -II--------------- - Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include include Include Min, Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 X1.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I -------------- II---------------If---------------II Volume Module: Base Vol: 13 38 13 166 12 45 41 1045 12 13 627 92 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 13 38 13 166 12 45 41 1045 12 13 627 92 Added Vol: 0 6 1 5 0 0 17 132 -10 20 117 2 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 13 44 14 171 12 45 58 1177 2 33 744 94 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 13 44 14 171 12 45 58 1177 2 33 744 94 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 13 44 14 171 12 45 58 1177 2 33 744 94 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 13 44 14 171 12 45 58 1177 2 33 744 94 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- I SaL' tj.ation Flow Module: Szat/¢ anc: 1600 1600 1.600 1..600 1600' 1.600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Ad j ust-uaent: 1. 00 'U. -00 1.00 1.. 00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes,: 1„00 0.76 0.24 1.00 O.�21 0.79 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.78 0.22 Final Sat.: 1600 12A4 3116 :6.6G10 :33•.7 1.263 1600 3195 5 1600 2841 359 II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.11 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.37 0.37 0.02 0.26 0.26 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** rraffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUI FWP AM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:39:39 Page 6-1 aazuxbu Park - mme - AM With Street Closure + Int Realignment ___________-__________-__________--_-_______-__-- Lenez Of Service Computation manort zco z(L000 as ovoze Length ») Me�hou (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #103 Downing a aanmua cvcza (sec): znU Critical vol./oap.(X): 0'577 Loma Time (sec): zo Average Delay (oec/veu): xxxr^x Optimal Cycle: aa Level of Service: . A Approach: North Bound South ovoud East Bound West Bound Movement: z - z - a c - r - u L - r - s n - z - a ------------|------------------------------||---------------| |--------------- Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: zuozodm Include Include Include Min. Green: o 0 O O O o n n o 0 o n r+o' 4.0 4'0 «'n 4.0 4.0 «.O 4.0 4.0 4'0 4.0 4.0 «.o Lanes: o 1 o O z o n z/ o o 1 o z z O z o l z U ------------|------------------------------||---------------| |---------------| volume Module: ouva vol: zn en 31 109 47 9 s 617 36 sz yso en Growth Auj: l'uo 1.00 l'OO 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1.00 Initial aoo, 28 so az zoy 47 9 3 617 36 51 eos os Added Vol: 17 o 10 o s O o 45 -z -s 26 u euoo6covvoz' n o 0 u O o n o o o n O Initial rut' 45 no 41 114 50 y s 662 35 45 yaa eo nsoz Auj: z'nu 1.80 1.00 z'OO 1.00 1.00 1.00 z -on 1'00 1.00 1.00 z^oO paF ndJ' 1.00 1.00 z'nn 1.00 z'UO 1`00 1.00 1-00 I.Ou 1.00 z'oo 1.00 ear Volume: *5 so 41 114 oO 9 3 662 ' 35 *o 989 95 Reuoct Vol: n n o o V O _ n _ V o O o o a6doced vol' 45 60 41 114 58 9 3 662 S5 45 989 95 PCE Adj' 1,00 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'80 1.00 1.08 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLr Auj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1'00 1.00 1'00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1.00 z'oo rioalvoznoe: 45 60 *z 114 so y 3 662 35 on yuo 95 ------------- |--------------- ||--------------- 1| --------------- ||--------------- Saturation Flow Module; Sat/Lane: 1600 zsno 1600 1600 1600 1600 zsoo 1600 1e00 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 l'ou 1.00 l'uo 1.00 1.00 z'oo I-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.43 0.57 1.00 0.66 0'29 0.05 l -nn 1.90 0'10 1'00 1.82 0.18 Final oat.: 686 e14 1600 zos« osu ns 1600 3039 161 zsno ceuo 280 ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Capacity aualrnim module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0'07 0'03 0.07 n'zz 8.11 0.00 0-22 0.22 0.03 n.a« 0.34 Crit moves: ^^^° ^*^° FWP PM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:40:11 Page 6-1 -------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Baldwin Park - EWP - PM With Street Closure and Intersection Realignment -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #103 Downing & Ramona Cycle (sec)-. 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.601 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 40 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L T R L T ------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ i --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- Volume Module: Base Vol: 12 21 29 49 31 12 2 1158 47 10 684 37 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1-00 1-00 1„00 1-00 1-00 1-00 1'00 1'00 Initial Bse: 12 21 29 49 31 12 2 1158 47 10 684 37 Added Vol: -7 0 -13 9 4 0 0 125 14 10 145 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 5 21 16 5B 35 12 2 1283 61 20 829 37 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 5 21 16 58 35 12 2 1283 61 20 829 37 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 5 21 16 58 35 12 2 1283 61 20 829 37 PCE Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1A0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 5 21 16 58 35 12 2 1283 61 20 829 37 ------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11_-____________-I Saturation Flow Module,.: 00 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 16 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1-00 1-00 1-00 1-00 1-00 1-00 1-00 1-00 1'00 1'00 Lanes, 0.19 0.81 1.00 0.56 0.33 0.11 1.00 1.91 0.09 1-00 1-91 0-09 Final Sat.: 306 1292 1600 884 533 183 1600 3055 145 1600 3063 137 ------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- Capacity Analysis Module: 07 0.00 0.42 0.42 0.01 0.27 0.27 Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.04 0.07 0. Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP AM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:39:39 Page 7-1 Baldwin Park - EWP - AM With Street Closure + Int Realignment Level Of Service Computation Report - +`m ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #104 Ramona & Badillo Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.675 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 47 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------- 1 --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II--------------- Control: -------------Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- Volume Module: Base Vol: 9 2 17 2 0 315 160 589 8 2 785 5 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 9 2 17 2 0 315 160 589 8 2 785 5 Added Vol: 0 0 0 4 0 3 29 31 0 0 17 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 9 2 17 6 0 318 1B9 620 8 2 802 5 User Adj: 1.100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.1.00 1.00 1.00, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.O0 PHF Volume: 9 2 17 6 0 318 189 620 B 2 802 5 Reduct- Vol: 0 0 a 0 0- - 0 0- 0 0 0 - 0 0. Reduced Vol: 9 2 17 6 0 318 189 620 8 2 802 5 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 9 2 17 6 0 318 189 620 8 2 802 5 - ---__--------------- II --------------- II --------------- II --------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.32 0.07 0.61 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.97 0.03 1.00 1.99 0.01 Final Sat.: 514 114 971 1600 0 1600 1600 3159 41 1600 3180 20 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- 11 --------------- li---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.12 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.25 0.25 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP PM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:40:11 Page 7-1 Baldwin Park - EWP - PM With Street Closure and Intersection Realignment Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #104 Ramona & Badillo Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.667 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 46 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T R __ ______________I 11 Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes : 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II --------------- 11_________--__--I Volume Module: Base Vol: 6 2 9 6 2 241 250 990 11 9 476 4 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 6 2 9 6 2 241 250 990 11 9 476 4 Added Vol: 0 0 0 3 0 61 61 60 0 0 94 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 6 2 9 9 2 302 311 1050 11 9 570 4 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 6 2 9 9 2 302 311 1050 11 9 570 4 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 6 2 9 9 2 302 311 1050 11 9 570 4 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 6 2 9 9 2 302 311 1050 11 9 570 4 ------------ I ---------- ---------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saijuuat,jan E").eaw Module: ;3a(„/1Pane:1600 1( 500 1600 1500 1600 1600 1.600 1.600 1600 1600 1600 1600 AdjustsneSt: 1.00 1.x'10 1.00 1..(,10 ')_.G)0 1.00 )..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes, 0.35 0..12 0.53 1.00 0.01 0.991 1..00 1..98 0.02 1.00 1.99 0.01 Final Sat.: 565 1.88 847 1600 1.l.. 1589 1600 3167 33 1600 3178 22 11- ------ __.m.p p -._.___. ------- I I --------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.33 0.33 0.01 0.18 0.18 Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP AM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:39:39 Page 8-1 Baldwin Park - EWP - AM With Street Closure + Int Realignment -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #105 Puente & Badillo Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.605 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 40 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R -------_---- I ---------------II-------------_- II --------------- II ---------------I Control.: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights. s . Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Ia,ines: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: .204 94 44 3 107 47 74 349 282 69 681 41 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 204 94 44 3 107 47 74 349 282 69 681 41 Added Vol: 3 1 0 0 6 0 0 33 2 0 7 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 207 95 44 3 113 47 74 382 284 69 688 41 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 ,1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 207 95 44 3 113 47 74 382 284 69 688 41 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p Reduced Vol: P01 95 44 3 113 47 74 382 284 69 688 41 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 207 95 44 3 113 47 74 382 284 69 688 41 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------11---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.60 0.27 0.13 0.02 0.69 0.29 1.00 1.15 0.65 1.00 1.89 0.11 Final Sat.: 957 439 203 29 1109 461 1600 1835 1365 1600 3020 180 ------------ I --------------- il--------------- II--------------- II ------ ---------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.22 0.22 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.05 0.21 0.21 0.04 0.23 0.23 Crit Moves: **** **** ******* NMI= I I I 1�' s _ s �. FWP PM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:40:11 Page 8-1 Baldwin Park - EWP - PM With Street Closure and Intersection Realignment ------------------------------------ Leve1 Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #105 Puente & Badillo Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.693 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle; 49 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L II--------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- -- ---I---------------II®-------------II-------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 146 81 82 13 97 29 45 891 169 53 365 16 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 146 81 82 13 97 29 45 891 169 53 365 16 Added Vol: 9 4 0 0 6 0 0 62 1 0 83 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 155 85 82 13 103 29 45 953 170 53 448 16 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 155 85 82 13 103 29 45 953 170 53 448 16 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 155 85 82 13 103 29 45 953 170 53 448 16 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 155 85 82 13 103 29 45 953 170 53 448 16 I--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.49 0.26 0.25 0.09 0.71 0.20 1.00 1.70 0.30 1.00 1.93 0.07 Final Sat.: 770 422 407 143 1137 320 1600 2716 484 1600 3090 110 -- ---------- I ----------- ----II -------------- .....III --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.01 0.09 0.09 0.03 0.35 0.35 0.03 0.15 0.14 Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP AM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:39:39 Page 9-1 Baldwin Park - mwP - AM With Street Closure + Int Realignment --------------------------------------- __-____________-_____________--_____-___ Levez or Service Computation Report ICU z(,Lomo as nvoze Length V) Method (Future vuznme Alternative) Intersection #106 Maine a eazmzvse Cycle (sec): lOO Critical vol -/cap -(r)' 0.347 Loss Time (sec): lO Average Delay (oec/veh): xsxxxx Optimal Cycle: 27 Level Of aezv1oe' u Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement' L - r - a L - r - R c - z - R z - r - a ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||---------------| coutzo/, Permitted Protected Permitted Permitted Rights - Iuuzaue Include include Include Min. Green: o n 0 O V o o o 0 o u n r+m, *.o 4'0 o'n «.o «.O 4.0 «.o o'O 4.0 4.0 «.o 4.0 Lanes: o o l 1 O 1 O c o n o o o o 0 1 n o o 1 ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||---------------| vozoma Module: Base Vol: o 686 zz 37 579 o o o O 12 o 31 Growth Auj: 1.00 1'80 1.00 1.00 z'no 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bae: o 686 zz 37 579 O n O o zu O sl uuueu Vol: o -oo n 0 31 o o o o o n U eansocayvoz: n o n V n o n 0 n o o o Initial rut; o 642 zz 37 szn o O o o 12 n 31 User Auj: 1.00 l'On z'OO 1'00 I'Vn 1,00 1.00 z'no 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 peF adj: 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1'08 1.00 1.00 1'00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 eeF vnznma: U soz zz 37 610 n o m n 12 o sz meduct Vol: V 0 00 O o n 0 � . o A o me6000d vol: 0 642 11 - 37 &0- 0 O 0 ' 0 12 D �t PCE Auj/ 1.no 1.Uo 1.80 l.Qo l'on 1'O0 z.Vn 1.0o a.80 1.00 z.oU 1.00 MLc uuj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 z~oo 1.00 z'Oo 1.00 1.00 1'00 FioaIvozomo; o 642 U 31 610 o o n o 12 o 31 ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Saturation Fzm^ Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 zaoo 1600 1600 1600 zoon 1600 1600 1600 1600 zeUo Adjustment: z'on 1'00 z'un 1.00 I'no 1'00 l'On z'on z'oo 1.00 1'00 z'ou Lanes: 0.00 1'97 0.03 1'00 2.00 0.00 0.00 o'oo n'no 1.00 0'00 1.00 Final Sat.: o 3146 o« 1800 3200 o U n o 1600 n zaon ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Capacity xoazyoio Module: Vol/Sat: O'OO 0'20 0.20 0.02 0.19 0.00 o'oo o'on 0'00 0.01 U'nO 0.02 Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP P PM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:40:11 Page 9 -1 ------------------------------------- Baldwin Park - EWP - PM With Street Closure and Intersection Realignment -------------------- _ Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #106 Maine & Palmrose Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.405 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 44 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --II---------------II---------------I Control: Permitted Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 ------------ I ---------------II--------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 692 15 32 876 0 0 0 0 14 0 23 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 692 15 32 876 0 0 0 0 14 0 23 Added Vol: 0 69 0 0 72 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 761 15 32 948 0 0 0 0 14 0 23 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 761 15 32 948 0 0 0 0 14 0 23 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 761 15 32 948 0 0 0 0 14 0 23 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 761 15 32 948 0 0 0 0 14 0 23 - ----------- I------------:--II---------------II---------------i{---------------I Saturation Flow Modules Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 1.96 0.04 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 3138 62 1600 3200 0 0 0' 0 1600 0 1600 --II---------------II_-_--_-_----_--II--______-----_-I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.24 0.24 0.02 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP AM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:39:39 Page 10-1 auzd°io eacx - Ewe - mu ' With Street Closure + zut Realignment ---------------- ------------------------------- --------------^����� Lenel of Service Computation Report zon z(Lons as Cycle Length x) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #107 Maine & Clark Cycle <v*o>' 100 Critical vol./oan. <x>' 0'571 Lona Time (sec): 10 average Delay (oer/vnu): xxxxox Optimal Cycle: 38 Level of Service: a Approach: North Bound South Bound ouot Bound Wast Bound Movement: L - z - R L - r - o L - r - R L - T - n ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||---------------| cmutznz; Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: include Include include Include Min. Green: 0 0 o O o o u u O 0 o n r+R` 4.0 4'0 4.0 o'u «.o 4,0 «.o 4.0 «.o o'n «'n 4'0 Lanes: l 0 z z n 1 o 1 1 o o l o o z o V l! 0 U ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||---------------| vvlume Module: Base Vol: oO osy zo 59 566 un 49 86 u* ux zzo 152 Growth Adj' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 I'uo 1'80 1.00 1.00 I-00 1.00 1.00 Initial ose: sn 639 13 59 osa 45 49 on oy 24 126 152 Added Vol: -10 zy o O 9 1 s -15 u o 1 I eaosezavvol; n o O o n o 8 o n n 0 O Initial Fut: 50 suo 13 59 575 os os 71 59 z« 127 153 ooac auj: z'nn 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1.00 1,00 1.00 por udj: z'oo 1.00 1.00 1'00 1'00 z'Ou 1.00 1.00 z'OO 1.00 1.00 1.00 eur volume, oV 658 13 59 575 us 55 Tz 5) 9 uo lzr 153 Red-uctynl: q 0 A n O 00 0 m ' « 0 0 -- Reduced n61; 50 658 13 SA 575 46 -55 -�1 59 24 127 ISS' --- - eoo ad1, 11.00 z'nu 1.00 1,00 1'00 l'oO 1.00 z'no z-oO 1.00 1.00 1.80 mLr u«j: 1.00 I,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 z'oO 1^00 oioazvolume, sn 658 13 so 575 46 su 71 os 24 127 153 ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 lsoo zsoo zsoo zaoo 1600 zsoV zsVn 1*00 zaUo zaOn zson Adjustment: 1.00 l'on 1.00 1.00 l'oo 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1.00 Lanes- 1.00 1.96 0.04 1.00 I.85 0.15 0.44 0.56 1.00 o-ou 0'4e 0.50 Final axt'; lsou slso oz zsno 2903 237 08 902 1600 126 668 oos ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: o'ns 0,21 0.21 0.04 0.19 0,19 0.03 0.08 n'no 0.02 0'19 0.19 Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP mmp PM Fri Dec zs, 014 13:40:11 rama zo-l___ _______________________---_____-_+------------------ Baldwin Park - EwP - mm With Street nzoaoce and zotecoeotiuo Realignment ����������������������������������������������������������������������---- ----- Level of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length n) Method (Focoze Volume urtmrnative)*�°�°°°^, Intersection °#I07°Maine *a*Clark °�°*^^****^+***°°*°°*�°^^°^°°°^°°**°**^*°°^�*°^^+ oroze (oeo)� 100 Critical vol./Can-(X): 0.572 Loss Time (sec): zo average Delay (aeo/veh): xxrxxx Optimal Cycle: sa Level of oezvioe`A*°°* Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound west Bound Movement; L - r - R z - r - R z - r - R ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- |\--------------- ||---------------| Coocrmz/ Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include zmzzode Min. ozeeo' n O O O o o o u u 0 n o 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4'8 4.0 4.0 «.n 4'0 4.0 s+u` I` O ' z ' �' o ' 1 ' o z o 0 �a��o� � ~ - | |\ ---||--------------- ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ------------ v«lpm« Modulo: Base Vol: -'- n� �o»l zz 66 000 29 42 89 7s cn 75 61 mrvotb Auj` z'`- 1.00 1 -OG 1'00 1,00 1.00 z.on z'no z.Vo z'on z.An 1.00 z Is 66 ooO oy 42 e9 75 uo 75 61 zui�i�z a�e� �«z « O z «o 7 7 13 0 0 » z »�ueu Vol: -8 -» zn n O o O o o o O » Initial Fut: o n O ean�eza�v» � « �7� l» 67 8m6 3s «* zo% 75 oo 83 oz nxor Adj: 100 z.�o 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I'Oo 1,00 1.00 1.00 ror Auj: 1'' ' '-O z.'O 1.00 1.00 I'Oo 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - paF Volume: » 55 12 67 u«s 36 49 102 7u zn na *u ueduot Vol: o o o O o O n n 0 n n n Reduced Vol: *3 575 13 67 846 ys uo lnu 75 28 83 62 PCE Auj' 1.00 z'oo 1.00 z'oO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 mLo Auj, 1.00 1'80 z -no 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 z'nU 1.00 1.00 1.00 mivalvoluma: 'y3 575 za 67 846 36 49 zoz 75 on eo 62 ___---------|--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/cane: 1600 1600 1600 3.600 1600 16QO ���n t�VO z��� ��Q8 16�� 1-600 010 Adjustment: 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 l.�1-00 1.00 �.�0 �.Q0 l^8� 1.QO 1.1-0()'zaoeo, 1'OO 1.96 0'04 1,00 1.92 0.08 0.32 0.68 1,00 0.16 0.48 0.36 Final Sat.: 1^oU 3l29 71 l�QQ 30�g ��� 5I1.081� �8l 1600 259 768 573 ' ` |/ Vh---------------U __----------|---------------\c--------------- --------------- Capacity Auazvoia Module: ny 03 n o8 O O On O.oz 0'11 »'zz Vol/Sat: o.06 0'10 0.18 0.04 0.28 0. . ' . Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP AM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:39:39 Page 11-1 Baldwin Park - EWP - AM With Street Closure + Int Realignment -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of.Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #108 Maine & Los Angeles Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.669 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 46 Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I ---------------II--------------- II --------------- II ---------------I C Ontr-o.1: Protf,.)ct wd Protected Permitted Permitted E.ight„s: Include I nc Rude Include Include Min Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Liu -nes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 148 655 24 49 487 101 120 290 119 63 605 71 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 148 655 24 49 487 101 120 290 119 63 605 71 Added Vol: 3 23 0 0 13 1 0 0 -3 0 0 1 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 151 678 24 49 500 102 120 290 116 63 605 72 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 151 678 24 49 500 102 120 290 116 6,3 605 72 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 _0 0 0 -__ 0 __ 0 0 _0 ___G Reduced Vol: 151 678 24 49 500 102 120 290 116 63 60°5 72 .. PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'0 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.,00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 151 678 24 49 500 102 120 290 116 63 605 72 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- 11-------------- �II---------------� Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.93 0.07 1.00 1.66 0.34 1.00 1.43 0.57 1.00 1.79 0.21 Final Sat.: 1600 3091 109 1600 2658 542 1600 2286 914 1600 2860 340 ------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.22 0.22 0.03 0.19 0.19 0.08 0.13 0.13 0.04 0.21 0.21 Crit Moves' **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP PM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:40:11 Page 11-1 Baldwin Park - EWp - rm With Street Closure and intersection Realignment --------------------- -_____________________-___--______-___--____________-______ Level Of Service Computation Report ICU l(roso as Cycle Length w) Method (Future Volume Alternative) zote,soctJoo+#zOe°Maine ^u°Los +Angeles °°°°�°°°°°°°�°+°*°^°°°°°°°^+^^°+*�°+«^°°*°° Cycle (sec): lOo Critical vol./omp.(x); 0.734 zoam Time (sec) zo Average Delay (oao/vou): zxxxxx opt,imwl Cycle: s5Level *of+Service; o**^° Appcoaob/ North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound movmmemt: L - z - o z - r - m L - r - a L - r - o ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Include zuclouo zuozpuo zouzuue Min. Green: oim�t�' o O 0 O O o o o 0 n o 0 x+m: «.O 4'0 4.0 4.0 4.0 «.o «.O 4.0 4.0 4.0 o'o 4.0 Lanes: z u z z u z V z z o 1 o z z 0 z ------------ ---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| nolome Module: Base vol: Isr 532 48 63 640 ss 116 722 zos 41 cJs «s Growth auj: 1-00 1.00 1'00 z'oo 1.00 1.00 1'00 z.oO 1'00 1,00 z'On l.00 Initial oue: 137 532 48 Js 640 56 116 722 183 41 233 46 'Auueu Vol: 7 25 0 z oz c u 1 14 o o z pasuoroxvvz: O O o o o 0 o n o O o 0 Initial Fut: 144 557 oo 64 691 58 118 723 197 41 233 47 User auj: 1.00 1.00 z'OO 1.00 1.08 1'00 z'on 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 eaF Auj: z'Uo z'OO 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1.00 l'VV 1.00 1.00 1,00 eaF Volume; 144 557 xa du 681 58 118 723 197 xz 233 47 oeuoot vol: O O O O O o o o O n o 0 Reduced vol; zxo 557 48 64 881 58 118 723 1e7 41 233 47 PCE au1' z'Uo z'ou 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1.00 z'nn l'oo 1^0O 1.00 1.00 MLF auj: z'no z'Oo 1.00 1,00 z -no 1.00 1.00 1.00 z'on 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fioalvoloma: z«o 557 48 64 681 sx zza 723 197 41 233 47 ------------|---------------|l---------------| |---------------||--------------- Saturation Flow Module; Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 zhVo z000 1600 1�0u zsno zdOo z6nn zoon Adjustment: 1.00 1'00 z'Oo 1.00 z.oV 1'00 z.on 1.00 1'00 "Do 1'00 1'00 Lanes: I'00 l'oo 0.16 1.00 1.84 0.16 n,16 z'00 1'57 0.431.00 1'66 0.34 Final oat': 1600 2946 254 1600 2949 251 zonn 2515 685 1600 2603 537 ------------ |--------------- }|--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Capacity Analysis --------------oapacitvAoalyoio mwu^la: zy 0 O« o ca u 2a O o7 0 u� o op o Vol/Sat: o'ny u'�» o' 03 0.09 0'09 , ' . . . . - Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP AM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:39:39 Page 12-1 Baldwin Park - EWP - AM With Street Closure + Int Realignment ----------------------------------------_------------------------------------------ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 RCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #109 Pacific & Bogart Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: C[ 23.9] Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------ --------------- ------------ 7-11 --------------- 11 --------------- I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 826 28 22 698 2 2 0 2 4 2 11 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 826 28 22 698 2 2 0 2 4 2 11 Added Vol: 0 17 6 2 40 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 843 34 24 738 2 2 0 2 10 2 17 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 843 34 24 738 2 2 0 2 10 2 17 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 843 34 24 738 2 2 0 2 10 2 17 I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4,1_xxxx_xxxxx 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.6 3.3 ------------I---------------11---------------II----------------II---------------I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 877 xxxx xxxxx 1210 1664 370 1277 1648 439 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 779 xxxx xxxxx 141 98 633 126 100 572 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 779 xxxx xxxxx 131 95 633 122 97 572 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.03 xxxx xxxx 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.02 0.03 ------------I---------------II---------------11---------------II--------------I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 9.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * A Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 217 xxxxx xxxx 219 xxxxx SharedQueue; 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxxx 0.4 xxxxx Shrd ConDel: 7;2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 21.9 xxxxx xxxxx 23.9 xxxxx Shared LOS: A * * * * * * C *' * C ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 21.9 23.9 ApproachLOS: * * C C Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP PM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:40:11 Page 12-1 Baldwin Park - EWP - PM With Street Closure and Intersection Realignment Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #109 Pacific & Bogart Average Delay (sec/veh): 5.5 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[101.5] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- --------------- __------------- -__________-___� Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------ _______________ --------------- --------------- ----_________--� Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 723 38 40 1025 7 3 0 5 31 0 24 Growth Adj: 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Initial Bse: 0 723 38 40 1025 1 3 0 5 31 0 24 Added Vol: 0 107 34 10 110 0 0 0 0 25 0 33 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 830 72 50 1135 7 3 0 5 56 0 57 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 830 72 50 1135 7 3 0 5 56 0 57 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 830 72 50 1135 7 3 0 5 56 0 57 ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- -__-__-__-___-_� Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 --------------------------- --------------- --------------- _---_---------_! Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 902 xxxx xxxxx 1654 2141 571 1534 2108 451 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 762 xxxx xxxxx 66 49 469 81 52 561 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 762 xxxx xxxxx 56 46 469 76 48 561 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.07 xxxx xxxx 0.05 0.00 0.01 0.73 0.00 0.10 --------------------------- --------------- --------------- ------_----_--_� Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 10.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * B Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 125 xxxxx xxxx 135 xxxxx SharedQueue: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.2 xxxxx xxxxx 5.3 xxxxx Shrd ConDel: 7.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 35.7 xxxxx xxxxx 102 xxxxx Shared LOS: A * * * * * * E * * F ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 35.7 101.5 ApproachLOS: * * E F Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP AM Fri Dec 19, 2014 1,3.39 39 Page 1.3-1 Baldwiri Park, - EWT? -- AM with Street (wJosure 1. '['oit Recilignment ---------------------- Level ---------------------Level Of SerViCO COMPUtation Rep(,'art ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length Method (E'Lkbire VoLime Alterriat.iv(a) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 01 * * * * * * k * * * * k *1 * * k'* * A, k A k k A, Intersection #110 Pacific & Dowrl.i.nq * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ****** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * k A k*kdF. A, Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol, IC41P. W 0.493 Loss Time (see): 10 Averaqe Delay (sec/veh)- xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 33 J,evel of Service: A * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * + k * k k A * * , * * * �, k k , * k k * k * * * * * k * k * * * * * * * * * * * * A, k k Approach-. North Bound S(nith Bound Bast Boui'id West sourld Movement: L - T - R L -- T -- R jlr R L T R ------------ I --------------- I I-- I---------,---,,--,-- G I I Control: Permitted P,ermittod Permitted Permitted Rights- Include Include Iriclude I ricl tide Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4 0 4,0 4.0 4,0 4.0 4.0 Lanes- 1 0 1 1 a 1. 0 1 1. 0 0 0 1, 1 0 0 0 0 1" 0 0 ------------I---------------I ------------ --------- Volume Module: Base Vol: 13 761 46 34 634 36 36 8 10 56 16 49 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1-00 1-00 1-00 1,00 1-00 Initial Bse: 13 761 46 34 634 36 36 8 10 56 16 49 Added Vol: 0 7 -4 -3 49 0 0 0 0 20 0 16 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 13 768 42 31 683 36 36 8 10 76 16 65 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 13 768 42 31 683 36 36 8 10 76 16 65 Reduct Vol... 0 - 0 - 0 - '0 - - 0 0 - 0 0 _'Q - -Q -0 Reduced Vol: 13 768 42 31 683 36 36 8 10 76 16 65 PCE Adj: 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume; 13 768 42 31 683 36 36 8 10 76 16 65 ------------ I --------------- I I -------------- I I --------------- ------ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1-00 1-00 1-00 1-00 1-00 Lanes: 1.00 1.90 0.10 1.00 1.90 0.10 0.67 0.15 0.18 0.49 0.10 0.41 Final Sat.: 1600 3034 166 1600 3040 160 1067 237 296 775 163 662 ------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.25 0.25 0.02 0.22 0.22 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.10 0.10 Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP PM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:40:11 Page 13-1 a^zuwiu Park - mwp - mm With Street Closure and zutezaeotimo nealisWont -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Laval of Service Computation Report zco l(Looa as Cycle cnogtu o) met»pu (Future vnz:mp Alternative) ^°°°^°°°°^°°~°°°°°°^^°^^^*^*°°^^*«°^°°°^°°*+°°**+^~°*^*°°°°°°*�°°°^°°^^°°+�°°+°^ Intersection #zzu Pacific a ou°oiug * * *°*°*°°^k *°*°*°* *°* * *°*^*°***°**°*°°°* ***^*** *�°�����°°°°�^��°°°���������°^°°° ovozo (sec): zon ccitio^1 Vol,./Cep.(X): 0.539 Loss Time (sec): zO Average Delay (sec/veb), xxroou Optimal Cycle: 36 Level of ae�rvice! A Approach: North Bound South Bound omstl Bound West amnou Movement: L - r - a L - T - R L - T - m L - z - a ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||---------------U|--------------- Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: zoozuue Include z^olude Include Miu' Green: o O n o o n O 0 Q 0 0 O Y+m: 4'0 4.0 4'0 4.0 4.0 4'0 4.0 «-o 4,0 4'8 u'o *'o Lanes: z o 1 z n I 0 l l 0 u m I! a 0 o 0 zl o U ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------| |---------------| volumo Module: o^ae vol, G 714 oz oO 987 y 13 4 u 85 z oO Growth udj: z'uo 1.00 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 z.00 I.uO I.oO z.Uo Initial oo°; s 714 uz 58 987 9 13 « 5 e5 1 nU Added vol: o 144 zo 19 116 o u 0 o -8 V -u eaos=zoyvol: O U o 0 o o V n u n o O Initial rut: a oso uo 69 1183 9 zz o o 79 l 48 User Auj: z'ou 1'00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 sor ad1: 1'00 1.00 1.00 1'00 z'Uo 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.00 roF Volume: s 858 56 sy 1103 9 13 4 5 79 z 48 aeduct Vol: o o U o o O n o o 8 O o aeuocou vol: 6 858 56 89 1103 y 13 o o 79 1 4e eos Auj: z'On 1'00 1.00 1'00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1.80 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 mLF ouj: 1'00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1'00 l'Oo 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 rivalvozuoe: 6 858 56 so 1103 9 13 u 5 79 1 48 ------------|--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1000 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 leuU 1600 Adjustment: 1'00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 z.00 1.00 z'un l'uO 1.00 Luora: 1.00 1'88 0.12 1.00 1.98 0.02 0.59 0.18 0.23 8.62 0'01 0,37 Final Sat.: 1600 3004 I96 1600 3174 26 945 291 364 988 Ia sno ------------ |---------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Capacity Auazvoiu Module: Vol/Sat: o'no 0'29 0.29 0.04 0.35 o'xu 0.01 0.01 0.01 0,05 0,08 n'uu Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP rWe ma Fri Dec ze, 2014 13:39:3e Page 14-1 Baldwin euck - owe - um With Street Closure + Int Realignment ________________________________________________________________________________ Lenel Of Service Computation Report ICU z<Loas as Cycle Length o> Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection �#11z°Pacific °u«Big +Dalton ��°*�°°*°°*�++°°+«*+°+*+^°�^*°°°++°°+^*^°* Cycle (sec).- loO Critical voz./oap'(z): 0.557 Luoa Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (oeo/veu): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 37 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West auoou Movement: L - r - a L - T - a z - T - o L - r - R ------------|---------------||---------------|�---------------f|---------------| Cmotzol� Protected Permitted Permitted Permitted R,igbtm: Include Include Include Tnolude, Min. Green: O O O W 0 U O 0 0 0 A 0 z+m/ u'V 4.0 «'U 4.0 4.0 «'o 4.0 4'0 4'0 4.0 «.O 4.0 canes, z o 1 l U z 0 1 z U o o l/ n o O o z/ o o ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||---------------| vozume Module: Base vol: 77 770 z 7 658 77 162 4 B3 a u s Growth Adƒ' z'no 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 z.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 z.nn 1.00 z'OQ Initial ase: 77 770 z 7 658 77 zez « ea 3 D 6 Added Vol: n 3 u o sy n u 0 O o O Q eavoerovvol' u n o o n V 0 o u O u o Initial rot: 77 773 z 7 727 77 162 m 03 3 o o User Amj, 1'80 1.80 1.00 1.00 I-08 1.00 1.08 1.00 1.00 1.80 I'qO 1.00 eeF Adj: 1.00 z'uU 1-80 1'00 I.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 I.00 1.00 I'00 1.00 Per vozomo' 77 773 z 7 727 77 zsu a 83 3 Q 6 'Rednnt Vnl; Q - O 0 0 0 O '_0 -- � -0 - & -'-Q .-O- Reduced Vol: 77 '173 1 7 727 /7 162 4 83 3 0 6 eom Adj' 1.00 z'oo 1.00 1,00 1'00 1.00 1.00, z'Qa 1.00 I'Qo.1.mo 1'00 mLE auj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 z'on 1.00 1'00 1'00 1'00 1.00 Fioazvozume` 77 773 1 r 727 77 1e2 « os o n a ------------|---------------| |--------------- Saturation plow Module: Sat/Lane: zsou zsno zano zsun zsOO 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Au1oatomot; 1.00 1.00 z'OU ^.no I.on z-oo z'nu 1,00 z.00 1.00 z.Ou z.00 Lanes: 1.00 1'99 0'01 I'on 1.81 0.19 0.*5 o'oo 0.33 0.33 0.00 0'67 Final oat'` 1600 3196 o 1600 2894 soa lnoI om 533 oaa o I067 ------------|---------------||-------------------------||--------------- Capacity nmazrain Module: . Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.24 0.24 0.00 0.25 0'25 0.10 0'16 0.16 0.00 0'08 0'01 Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP PM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:40:11 Page 14-1 Baldwin Park - EWP - PM With Street Closure and Intersection Realignment --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #111 Pacific & Big Dalton Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.612 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 41 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I---------------II---------------II--------------- II ---------------I Control: Protected Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 49 654 0 4 947 93 99 4 91 0 0 1 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3...00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 49 654 0 4 947 93 99 4 91 0 0 1 Added Vol: 0 159 0 0 111 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 49 813 0 4 1058 93 99 4 91 0 0 1 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 PHF Volume: 49 813 0 4 1058 93 99 4 91 0 0 1 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 49 813 0 4 1058 93 99 4 91 0 0 1 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1,00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 49 813 0 4 1058 93 99 4 91 0 0 1 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 1.84 0.16 0.51 0.02 0.47 0.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 0 1600 2941 259 816 33 751 0 0 1600 _----------- I----------------II---------------II--------------- II ---------------j Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.06 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP AM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:39:40 Page 15-1 Baldwin Park - EWP - AM With Street Closure + Int Realignment ----------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #112 Cesar Chaez & Ramona Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.614 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 41 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ----_------- I ---------------II--------------- II ---------------- II --------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I ---------------II--------------- II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 16 0 85 10 0 34 49 606 36 64 780 7 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 16 0 85 10 0 34 49 606 36 64 780 7 Added Vol: 8 0 6 -11 0 0 48 -12 1 12 108 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 154 0 0 0 0 0 0 164 65 0 Initial Fut: 24 0 245 -1 0 34 97 594 37 240 953 7 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 24 0 245 0 0 34 97 594 37 240 953 7 Reduct Vol: - 0 0 _ _0 0_ __0 ___0 __0 _ 0 _0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 24 0 245 0 0 34 91 594 37 240 953 1 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.100 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 24 0 245 0 0 34 97 594 37 240 953 7 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11--------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 16047 Adjustment; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.88 0.12 1.00 1.99 0.01 Final Sat.: 1600 0 1600 1600 0 1600 1600 3012 188 1600 3177 23 ------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.06 0.20 0.20 0.15 0.30 0.30 Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 200 Dowling Assoc.e to THE MOBILITY.fi r P PM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:40:11 Page 15-1 Baldwin Park - EWP - PM With Street Closure and Intersection Realignment ------------------- - Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #112 Cesar Chaez & Ramona Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.785 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11--____---_---_-� Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes- 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I--------------- --------------- 11--------------- --_------_----_� Volume Module: Base Vol: 2 0 111 22 0 54 57 1220 43 94 748 14 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 2 0 111 22 0 54 57 1220 43 94 748 14 Added Vol: 10 0 3 -5 0 0 25 152 13 19 141 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 251 0 0 0 0 0 0 199 74 0 Initial Fut: 12 0 365 17 0 54 82 1372 56 312 963 14 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.'00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 12 0 365 17 0 54 82 1372 56 312 963 14 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 12 0 365 17 0 54 82 1372 56 312 963 14 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 FinalVolume: 12 0 365 17 0 54 82 1372 56 312 963 14 ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- --------___-___� Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.92 0.08 1.00 1.97 0.03 Final Sat.: 1600 0 1600 1600 0 1600 1600 3075 125 1600 3154 46 ------------ --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- 11-----_-___--_--� Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.00 0.23 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.45 0.45 0.20 0.31 0.31 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP AM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:39:40 Page 1.6-1 Baldwin Park - EWP - AM With Street Closure + Int Realignment ____ Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #113 Baldwin Park & Ramona Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.593 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 39 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement- L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ____________--------------- H --------------- Nf--------------- 1)-_-__---__---_-� Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ____________ I _______________ --------------- --------------- -__-___--_-___-� Volume Module: Base Vol: 85 396 112 92 390 126 114 566 10 lb2 612 36 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: B5 396 112 92 390 126 114 566 10 102 612 36 Added Vol: 6 -7 23 -2 4 -1 -2 10 0 40 58 16 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 0 0 Initial Fut: 91 389 135 90 394 125 112 576 10 207 670 52 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 91 389 135 90 394 125 112 576 10 207 670 52 Redact- Vol: --- 0 -0 - -0_ 0 0_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 91 389 135 90 394 125 112 576 10 207 670 52' PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 91 389 135 90 394 125 112 576 10 207 670 52 ------------ )--------------- 11--------------- --------------- _-_---__----_--� Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.97 0.03 1.00 1.86 0.14 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3145 55 1600 2970 230 ------------ --------------- 11 --------------- )--------------- 11--_---------_--� Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.12 0.08 0.06 0.12 0.08 0.07 0.18 0.18 0.13 0.23 0.23 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP PM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:40:11 Page 16-1 Baldwin Park - EWP - PM With Street Closure and Intersection Realignment - Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length e) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #113 Baldwin Park & Ramona Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.947 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 131 Level Of Service: E Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ----------- -1 --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II --------------- I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------11---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 77 371 216 181 426 84 132 966 46 191 561 67 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 77 371 216 181 426 84 132 966 46 191 561 67 Added Vol: 5 28 61 29 20 1 5 95 0 50 76 24 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 74 0 0 Initial Fut: 82 399 277 210 446 85 137 1061 46 315 637 91 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 82 399 277 210 446 85 137 1061 46 315 637 91 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol:. 82 399 277 210 446 85 137 1061 46 315 637 91 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 82 399 277 210 446 85 137 1061 46 315 637 91 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.92 0.08 1.00 1.75 0.25 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3067 133 1600 2800 400 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- 11 --------------- 11---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.12 0.17 0.13 0.14 0.05 0.09 0.35 0.35 0.20 0.23 0.23 Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP AM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:39:40 Page 17-1 Baldwin Park - Ewe - ma With Street Closure + Int Realignment ----------- -_--------------------------------- .-------------------- _------------ Level Of Service Computation Report ICU z(Loau as Cycle Lountu x) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #114 Stewart a m^mouu ovcz* (soo), 108 Critical voz./tap.(x), 0.579 Loss Time (sec): lo Average Delay (eeo/veu): xo,xxx Optimal cyoza' zo Level or Service: A Approach: North Bound South u000u East Bound West Bound Movement: L - z - m L - z - a L - r - m L - z - a ------------I------------------------------:|---------------U|--------------- Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include zoozuue Min. mzeoo: o o o n o u o o o o m 0 x+u: 4'0 4.0 4.0 o'u 4'0 *'u «.n «'o 4'0 o -u «.o 4.0 Lanes: 0 o l! o o o o z! o n z n I 1 n z o 1 z o ------------ |---------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||------ ---------| vozoue Module: Base vol: 77 106 105 31 67 so 50 ssz oz 56 729 7 Growth ad1: z'uo 1.00 1.80 z'Oo 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial eao: 77 zos 105 31 67 sn oo 551 *1 es 72e 7 Added Vol: o n o o u o n 16 o u 60 n ea000royvoz: o o u o o n o o o o O 0 Initial Fut: 77 106 105 31 67 so eo 567 41 56 ?uo 7 nsaz auj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 z-ou 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1.00 l,Au 1.00 1-00 rsF xdj: 1.00 1,00 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I'oO 1.00 1.00 z'OO 1.00 saF Volume: 77 186 103 sz 67 oo 50 567 «z 56 789 7 'Reduot Vol/ n u O --V o ~ u ° u -=-o =-0- -- 0 ;-0 ,`0, Reduced Vol: 77 zos 105 31 67 50 sV 567 41 ms `no 1 , PCE auj: 1.00 z'Oo 1.00 z'Oo 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'80 z'Oo z'on 1.00 mLr xuj' 1.00 1.00 1.00 z'UO 1.00 1.00 z'OO 1.00 1.00 z'OO z'Oo 1.00 rioazvozcme: 77 zOs 105 21 67 sn so 567 «z 56 789 7 ------------/--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane; 1600 zsou 1600 1600 1600 zsoo zsoO 1600 1600 zsVu zaoo 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 1.00 z'oo z'OU 1.00 z'Uo z'ou z,OO 1.00 Lanes. 0.27 0.37 0.36 n'cz o,«o 0.34 z'oo 1.87 o'zz 1'80 1.98 0.02 Final oat.: «zo 589 583 zao 724 541 zdVV zsoo 216 zsoo 3172 28 -------=--�|�---�~�--------||--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Capacity Auazraio Module: vol/aat, 0'05 0'18 0.19 0.02 0.09 0.09 0'03 0.19 0.19 o.O« 0'25 0.25 Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP PM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:40:11 Page 17-1 Baldwin e^zu - mWe - em With Street Closure and Intersection Realignment ------------------------ _______-________--___-____-_____-_-_______-___-__ Level Of Service Computation Report zon 1(Loo5 as Cycle Length n) Method (Future volume Alternative) zotozaeotiou #zzo Stewart u Ramona Cycle (^no): zOV Critical voI./cap.<X>: 0.631 Loss Time <oeo>: 10 Average Delay (vov/vou)' zoxzxx Optimal cvczo: «s Level of service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - r - R L - T - a L - z - R L - T - R ------------ |--------------- Y\--------------- ||--------------- A| --------------- Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include mio' Gzaou: O 0 o U n o o n n n o 0 Y+m: «'O 4'0 4'0 4.0 «.V x'o 4.0 4.0 4.0 o'o 4'0 4.0 Lanes: 0 O 1! V o 0 o z! o 0 z o z z o 1 n z z o ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||---------------i vozomo Module: Base vol: «o 85 67 25 oo 37 100 son «o 82 «oy u] Growth auj: 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 z'nn 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial ouo: «O 85 67 %o 80 37 znO 948 on 82 489 23 Added Vol: 0 o n o o O o 112 n n 79 O pnssozayvoz: 0 o n n o n n n n n O O Initial Fut: «O 85 67 us 8n 37 I00 zVso 40 82 558 ua User ad1: 1.00 1'00 1.00 l -nn 1'00 1.00 l'Vo z'On l'OO 1.00 1'00 I.00 eHF xuj; 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1'00 z'Oo 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 naF Volume: 40 85 67 25 Vn 37 100 10e0 oo 82 uon zs meuont Vol: O o o n o n n O n o 0 n Reduced Vol: ou 85 67 25 oo 37 100 zo*o 40 82 568 23 PCE udj: 1.00 z'oo 1.00 l.Oo 1.00 1.00 1.00 z'on 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLo Auj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 z'oo 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 rivazvuzozme: 40 85 67 25 80 37 lOO zOoO «O 82 568 zs ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1*00 1600 1600 1600 1680 zsnn zsoo 1600 1600 1600 zsOo zsoO Adjustment: 1.00 z'oo 1'00 1.00 l'OO 1.00 z'no z.00 z.00 1.00 1.00 l.00 Lanes: 0.21 0'44 0.35 0,18 o'uo 0.26 1.00 1.93 0.07 1.00 1.92 0.08 rionz Sat.: 333 708 558 282 onz 417 I000 xVo« 116 1600 3o75 zos ------------|---------------| |---------------||---------------||--------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0'03 0'12 0,12 0.02 0,09 0.09 o'os 0'34 o.a* 0'05 0.18 0.18 Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP AM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:39:40 Page 18-1 Baldwin Park - mWP - mm With Street ozoanze + Int Realignment ---------------------------- ________-_-__------------------------------- -------- Level of Service Computation Report zmn z<uzau as Cycle Length *> Method (Future vmznme Alternative) Intersection #115 Merced u Ramona c»oza (neo): zoo Critical nol./Can.(x)' 0.667 Loss Time (sec): zO Average Delay (aeo/reW: xuxxox Optimal Cycle: *a Level Of Service: o Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - z - R L - r - a L - r - a L - r - R ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: u o o n n o o O 0 O n o r+u: 4.0 «'o «.o 4.0 o'o «.o «.o 4.0 4'0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 o z z o z o z z O z 0 z z O 1 o z z O ------------|--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||---------------| Yo1ume Module' Baso vol, zsy zGa mz 72 281 122 108 520 46 29 e13 45 Growth Adj. z -nu I'00 1'00 z'oo z -Da I.00 I-uo z -no 1.00 1.08 z.00 z.uo Initial l3se: 139 263 sx 72 281 122 108 520 «e 29 uzz 45 Added vol: 0 o 3 o u o o 13 n c 58 o naysecByvwl: 0 8 0 U U n 8 0 O O 0 0 zmjtiaj� Fut: zse 263 55 72 281 122 zuo 533 *s sz 871 45 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 z-oo z'uO 1.00 1.00 z'OU I^00 z-oo 1.00 rar Adj., 1'00 1.00 1.00 z'nn 1-00 1.00 1.00 z-oo 1.00 1.00 z-oO 1.00 euF Volume' zay oma 55 72 ouz zxn zoB 533 46 az 871 45 Redmct Vmlx_ O ,`O , U -'--0-'=Q` ==`D .=0. =Q 'u .'n n'. - =, Reduced Vol: zag 263 55 72 28I 122 1.08 533 46 al 871 45 PCE ArAjr z -mu 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.08 1.00 I-00 z-oo 1.00 1.00 z-oo 1.00 MLli,' adj: 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.80 z-oo 1.00 1.00 1.00 z -on z -on 1-00 Fin=zvolume: 139 263 55 72 281 122 108 533 «e 31 871 45 ------------h --------------- ||--------------- [|--------------- ||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: oat/Laum: laoO zsoo /sou zeoo 1e00 1680 zsno zann 1600 1600 zsou zaoo udjuotoent; 1.00 1.08 z'oo 1.80 l'oo z.on 1'00 z.nO z.uo z.00 z.no z.Oo Laoem; z -nn 1.65 0.35 1-00 1'3e 0.61 1-00 z-ao 0.16 1.00 1'90 0.10 Final. Sat..- 1600 2647 553 zGon oosz 968 1600 2946 254 1600 3043 157 ------------|--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol./Sat: 0.09 U.zn 0'10 o'on 0.13 0.13 0-07 n'l$ 0.18 0.02 0.29 0.29 Crit moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP PM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:40:11 Page 18-1 Baldwin Park - EWP - PM With Street Closure and Intersection Realignment ------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #115 Merced & Ramona Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.661 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 46 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ---------_---I---------------II--------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 37 266 62 62 300 41 113 978 132 57 473 68 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 37 266 62 62 300 41 113 978 132 57 473 68 Added Vol: 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 107 0 4 75 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 37 266 67 62 300 41 113 1085 132 61 548 68 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 37 266 67 62 300 41 113 1085 132 61 548 68 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 37 266 67 62 300 41 113 1085 132 61 548 68 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 37 266 67 62 300 41 113 1085 132 61 546 68 ---------_-- I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.60 0.40 1.00 1.76 0.24 1.00 1.18 0.22 1.00 1.78 0.22 Final Sat.: 1600 2556 644 1600 2815 385 1600 2853 347 1600 2847 353 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- 11 --------------- 11---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.10 0.10 0.04 0.11 0.11 0.07 0.38 0.38 0.04 0.19 0,-.19 Crit Moves: **** *** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP AM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:39:40 Page 1.9-1 Baldwin Park - EWP - AM With Street Closure + Int Realignment ------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #116 Merced 6 Baldwin Park Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.615 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 41 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- pl---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 I--------------- 1f__. -_________._-_II--------------- II--------------- Volume ----__-------Volume Module: Base Vol: 184 418 191 50 298 103 98 434 72 155 592 44 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 164 418 191 50 298 103 98 434 72 155 592 44 Added, Vol: 0 3 9 0 2 0 0 10 0 7 45 0 Passe.rByVo,i: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial T:"ut':: 184 421 200 50 300 103 98 444 72 162 637 44 User Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P131a" Volume: 184 42:G 200 50 300 103 98 444 72 162 637 44 R duct Vol,:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 184 421 200 50 300 103 98 444 72 162 637 44 PCE Adj: 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 184 421 200 50 300 103 98 444 72 162 637 44 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.36 0.64 1.00 1.49 0.51 1.00 1.72 0.28 1.00 1.87 0.13 Final Sat.: 1600 2169 1031 1600 2382 818 1600 2753 447 1600 2993 207 I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.19 0.19 0.03 0.13 0.13 0.06 0.16 0.16 0.10 0.21 0.21 Crit. Moves: ��.�� ��•�� ���� m,��� ***k**A,k��u^4*4*��*^k*•dnk#�^�y,de•dr+N•aka*�k'"krk•&�*.*,k�.,�r,Fmk^dr'�.d•*•,k�,*dr*m*-k*1N'#�Ntw*��'�''k'.Se^k*•/e ��„vM *rW4drrvN•.. v1'i4�• Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP FWP PM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:40:11 Page 19-1 Baldwin Park - EWP - PM With Street Closure and Intersection Realignment Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #116 Merced & Baldwin Park Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.723 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 53 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I ---------------II--------------- II---------------II---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------_------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 75 312 166 31 391 91 100 688 116 217 535 32 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 75 312 166 31 391 91 100 688 116 217 535 32 Added Vol: 0 5 9 0 4 0 0 95 0 12 68 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 75 317 175 31 395 91 100 783 116 229 603 32 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 75 317 175 31 395 91 100 783 116 229 603 32 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 75 317 175 31 395 91 100 783 116 229 603 32 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 75 317 175 31 395 91 100 783 116 229 603 32 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.29 0.71 1.00 1.63 0.37 1.00 1.74 0.26 1.00 1.90 0.10 Final Sat.: 1600 2062 1138 1600 2601 599 1600 2787 413 1600 3039 161 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.15 0.15 0.02 0.15 0.15 0.06 0.28 0.28 0.14 0.20 0.20 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP MITIG8 - FWP PM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:33:59 Page 1-1 Baldwin Park - FWP w Mit (Add RT Lanes) - PM With Street Closure and Intersection Realignment Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #101 Maine & Ramona Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.089 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: F Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11_______________I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 --------------- 11--------------- 11--------------- 11_______________I Volume Module:. Base Vol: 111 457 72 116 617 110 161 1017 186 129 635 100 Growth Adj: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 Initial Bse: 121 497 78 126 671 120 175 1106 202 140 690 109 Added Vol: 56 137 4 67 145 31 46 101 35 6 68 48 PasserByVol: 173 -53 0 0 -124 124 53 0 222 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 350 581 82 193 692 275 274 1207 459 146 756 157 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 350 581 82 193 692 275 274 1207 459 146 758 157 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 350 581 82 193 692 275 274 1207 459 146 758 157 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 350 581 82 193 692 275 274 1207 459 146 758 157 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.75 0.25 1.00 1.43 0.57 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 2803 397 1600 2291 909 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 ------------I---------------II---------------1f---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.22 0.21 0.21 0.12 0.30 0.30 0.17 0.38 0.29 0.09 0.24 0.10 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP MITIG8 - EVP PM Fri Feb 20, 2015 14:09:38 Page 1-1 Baldwin Park - FWP w Mit (Add RT Lanes) - PM With Street Closure and Intersection Realignment -------------------- -~ Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #113 Baldwin Park & Ramona Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.020 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: F Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I---------------II---------------II--------------- II ---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 77 371 216 181 426 84 132 966 46 191 561 67 Growth Adj: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1,09 1.09 1.09 1.09 Initial Bse: 84 403 235 197 463 91 144 1050 50 208 610 73 Added Vol: 5 75 76 29 71 1 5 119 0 62 100 24 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 81 0 0 Initial Fut: 89 47B 311 226 534 92 149 1169 50 351 710 97 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1..00 :1- 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 991 478 311 226 534 92 149 1169 50 351 710 97 Reduct- :.VQ1-. 0 0 0 0 0 _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 89 4.78 311 226 534 92 149 1169 50 351 710 97 PCE Adj: 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1,00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1...00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 89 478 311 226 534 92 7049 1169 50 351 710 97 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 ------------1---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.15 0.19 0.14 0.17 0.06 0.09 0.37 0.03 0.22 0.22 0.06 Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (:c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP MITIGB - FWP PM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:34:52 Page 1-1 Baldwin Park - FWP w Mitigation (Add RT Lanes and Keep WB Open) - PM With Street Closure and Intersection Realignment ------®--------------- -- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #101 Maine & Ramona Cycle (sec); 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.981 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 168 Level Of Service: E Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I ---------------II--------------- II --------------- II ----------------I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------------1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 111 457 72 116 617 110 161 1017 186 129 635 100 Growth Adj: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 Initial Bse: 121 497 78 126 671 120 175 1106 202 140 690 109 Added Vol: 56 137 4 67 145 31 46 101 35 6 68 48 PasserByVol: 0 -53 0 0 0 0 53 0 222 0 0 0 Initial Fut 177 581 82 193 816 151 274 1207 459 146 758 157 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 177 581 82 193 816 151 274 1207 459 146 758 157 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 177 581 82 193 816 151 274 1207 459 146 758 157 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 177 581 82 193 816 151 274 1207 459 146 758 157 ------_----- I---------------II-------_-------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.75 0.25 1.00 1.69 0.31 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 2803 397 1600 2701 499 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 _----------- I ---------------II--------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.21 0.21 0.12 0.30 0.30 0.17 0.38 0.29 0.09 0.24 0.10 Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP MITIG8 - FWP PM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:35:01 Page 1-1 Baldwin Park - FWP w Mitigation (Add RT Lanes and Keep WB Open) - PM With Street Closure and Intersection Realignment -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #113 Baldwin Park & Ramona Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.969 Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 153 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------------------------- --------------- 11 --------------- II_ --------_-----I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 ------------ _______________ --------------- If--------------- II_______________t Volume Module: Base Vol: 77 371 216 181 426 84 132 966 46 191 561 67 Growth Adj: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 Initial Bse: 84 403 235 197 463 91 144 1050 50 208 610 73 Aided Vol: 5 7'5 76 29 71 1 5 119 0 62 100 24 PasserByVol: D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial, Fut- 89 4.)6 311 226 534 92 149 1169 50 270 710 97 User Adj 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHU' Volomo: 89 478 311 226 534 92 149 1169 50 270 710 97 Rglgc,t: '.ok « 11 0 Q _ 0 0 _.._ 0_ 0 0 __0 0 . __ 0 0 0.. Reduced Vol: 89 47.8 311 226 534 92 149 1169 50 270 710 97 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 89 478 311 226 534 92 149 1169 50 270 710 97 ___________________________ --------------- --------------- -_____--_-_-_--` Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 ___________________________ --------------- --------------- ----_____--__-_� Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.15 0.19 0.14 0.17 0.06 0.09 0.37 0.03 0.17 0.22 0.06 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP MITIG8 - FWP PM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:40:55 Page 1-1 Bazdwineark-EWP w Mit (Add RT LaneoOnly)-PM With Street Closure and Intersection Realignment ------------------------------------------------- Level or Service Computation n=noct zon I(Looa as Cycle Length v) Method (Future Volume Alternative) � Intersection #101 Maine a Ramona � Cycle (sec): zUO Critical voz./oap. (x)' 0'990 � Loss Time (sec): lO anazave Delay (oan veu): xxuzxx i Optimal Cycle: 180 Level of oecvioa` E Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound west ovuou Movement: L - r - a L - r - a L - r - R L - z - u i------------|---------------||---------------| |---------------||--------------- Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: zucznue Include Include Include � Min. Green: u u u V O o o n O O o 0 r+R' «.n «,V 4.0 4'0 o'n «.O «.o 4.0 «'o 4.0 «.o «.O Lanes: l u l 1 0 z o 1 z o 1 0 c O z z o u 0 z -^�---------|--------------- ||--------------- |\--------------- ||---------------| volomo Module: Base Vol: zzz 457 72 116 617 110 161 1017 186 129 635 100 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 z.uo z.Ou 1.00 l.00 z.oO z.oO Initial amo: 111 457 72 116 617 110 zsz 1017 186 1e9 635 100 Added Vol: xo 96 « 67 102 31 46 al 16 6 49 4a eaaaerarvoz: 159 -«o O n -zla 114 xy O 204 0 0 o Initial Fut: xzu uu* 76 zna sos 255 uoa 1098 406 135 684 1*8 ooez auj: 1'00 z'Do 1.00 z'oU 1.00 1'00 z'no l'uu 1'00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Peemdj: 1,00 1.00 1.00 z'Ou 1'00 1.00 1'00 I'Oo 1,00 1,00 1'00 1.00 eas Volume: 310 504 76 183 605 255 256 1098 406 135 sVo 148 Vol: n u 0 u o V O o n O o O ----------- --1,--3zo--504---7�- -zH3--Go5---2m5---2m�-z09�--����-����-�����--z�'8-'--'--------- PCE Aui: 1'00 z'OO 1.00 1.00 1,00 z'OU 1'00 z.n8 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF odj' 1.00 1.00 1'00 1.00 z'uu 1.00 1.00 1.80 1.00 l'Uo 1'00 1.00 rio^lvolome` slO 504 76 183 605 oso 256 zOen 400 zxs so* 148 ------------ |--------------- ||~-------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Saturation Flow umdozo, Sat/Lane: zaoo zsoo 1600 zaon zsoo zsoV 1600 1600 1680 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.80 z'oo z'oo l.no z.00 1.00 1.00 l.Oo 1'00 l.Oo Lanes: z'nn 1.74 O'ze 1.00 1'41 0.59 1.00 u'oO z'no 1'00 2.00 1.00 Final oat,, zoOn 2781 419 1600 2251 949 1600 3200 1600 1600 sxoO 1600 ------------|---------------||---------------| |--------------- ||----------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.19 0.18 o-18 0,11 0'27 0.27 0.16 0'34 0.25 o'oa 0'21 0'09 Crit Moves: rraffio 8.0'0715 (o) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE mmBzLzrr enooe MITIG8 - FWP PM Fri Dec 19, 2014 13:41:38 Page 1-1 Baldwin Park-EWrwMit(AddazLaneaandmeepwaOpen)-eM With Street Closure and Intersection Realignment -�__-___-________-_-__-__-__-__-___-__-__-_-_--_-_____-_--__-_-___-________--__- Lavel of Service Computation Report zco z(Loaa as Cycle Length n) Method (Future Volume Alternative) rutecee*tinu #znz mziva & Ramona Cycle (sec): 100 Critical vol./oam,(x): 0.891 zmma Time (sec)-. 10 Average Delay (omo/veu), xzxxxu Optimal Cycle: 96 Level Of Service: o Approach: North Bound South omood East Bound West Bound Movement: z - z - o L - z - a z - r - o L - r - a ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||---------------| ouotzoz: Protected Protected` Protected Protected Rights: Include Include zooznde Include Min. Green: o o n o o o o u o O n o Y+n' x'n 4.0 4.0 «'o «.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4'0 «.n «'o «.o Lanes: z o z 1 o z U z 1 0 z n o n l z o 2 0 l ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||---------------| voluum Module: Base Vol: 111 457 72 116 617 zzu 161 1017 186 zos 635 zoo Growth Amj: 1'00 z'Ou z'oO 1.00 1.00 z.uo I -no I'80 l.no 1.00 z.no z.on Initial ooa; zzz 457 72 lzs 817 zzo 161 1017 186 129 635 zoO Added Vol: oo 96 A 67 zuz yz 46 az ze a mo «a raaaoravvol: o -«g o o o O xe 0 284 O o o Initial rot' zzz 504 ?s 183 719 141 256 1098 *oa 135 684 148 nnmc Auj: 1.00 1.00 z'uo 1.00 1.00 1.00 z'Ou z -Vo 1.00 z'no 1.00 1.00 ron udj, z'uo 1'00 1.00 z.ou z.:n z'on 1.00 z'ou 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 eoF Volume: zoz 504 76 183 71e 141 256 1098 406 zao 684 I*o neduct Vol: o n n n U o u o u o o o Reduced Vol: zoz zo« 76 zoa 719 141 256 1098 406 133 aou zon eom Auj' 1.00 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.08 1'00 1'00 1.00 mLF nuj: 1.00 1.00 l'oo 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 z'oo z'oU 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fioalvolome: 151 oov 76 183 719 141 aos I098 406 135 684 1*8 ------------ |--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- ||--------------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 zsnn 1600 laoo 1e00 1000 zsuo 1600 zmon lsoo 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.08 1.00 z.no z.00 1.00 z.VO 1.00 z'Oo 1.00 Lanes., z'nu 1.74 0.26 1.00 1.67 0.33 1.00 2'00 1.00 1.00 2,00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 2781 xzp zsoo 2675 525 zsOo 3200 zsoo zsno 3200 1600 ------------|---------------||---------------| |---------------| |--------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.18 8.18 0.11 0.27 0.27 0'16 u']^ 0'25 o.o8 0.21 0,09 Crit Moves: Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to THE MOBILITY GROUP ATTACHMENT #4 FINAl.j ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Final CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DOWNTOWN TRANSIT -ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT Environmental Impact Report (EIR) State Clearinghouse No. 2014121098 Prepared for City of Baldwin Park Community Development Department September 2015 Final CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DOWNTOWN TRANSIT -ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT Environmental Impact Report (EIR) State Clearinghouse No. 2014121098 Prepared for City of Baldwln Park Community Development Department Fav 626 Wfthho Boulevard Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 219.599.4300 www.e&, ss.com Irvine Oakland Orlando Palm Springs Pokeluma Portland Sacramento DiegoSan San Francisco Seattle Tampa Woodland Hills September 2015 E SA' TABLE OF CONTENTS Downtown TOD Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report Page 1. Introduction.....................................................................................................................1-1 Formatof the Final EIR.....................................................................................................1-1 CEQA Requirements Regarding Comments and Responses ......................... ................ 1-3 2. Response to Comments ....................................... ............. ...... ---- .... ............... .......... 2-1 California Department of Transportation District 7 .................................. .......................... 2-2 California Department of Transportation District 7 ........ .......................... ......................... 2-9 Metrolink..................................................................................................................... 2-14 State of California Public Utilities Commission ....................... ................. ....... ..,...... 2-19 County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, ......... ...... ...... ................. 2-22 StateClearinghouse...................................................................................................... 2-25 JulietM. Arroyo ....................................................... ...a..................... ,.....,.,..........,.......... 2-31 3. Revisions to the Draft EIR .............. ..... .. .................. ......... 3-1 4. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ................. ...............4..1 Baldwin Park 7DD Specific Plan Project i ESA / D130953 August 2015 CHAPTER1 Introduction This Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) has been prepared in conformance with the environmental policy guidelines for the implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to evaluate the environmental effects that may result from construction and operation of the proposed Downtown Transit -Oriented Development (TOD) Specific Plan (proj ect). According to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15132, the Final EIR shall consist of: (a) The Draft EIR or a revision of the Draft; (b) Comments and recommendations received on the Draft EIR, either verbatim or in summary; (c) A list of persons, organizations, and public agencies commenting on the Draft EIR; (d) The responses of the lead agency to significant environmental points raised in the review and consultation process; (e) Any other information added by the lead agency. This document contains responses to comments received on the Draft EIR for the proposed project during the public review period that began May 1, 2015, and closed June 22, 2015. This document has been prepared in accordance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, and represents the independent judgment of the lead agency, the City of Baldwin Park. This document and the circulated Draft EIR comprise the Final EIR in accordance with CEQA Guidelines, Section 15132. Format of the Final EIR The following chapters are contained within this document: Chapter 1, Introduction. This chapter describes CEQA requirements and the content of the Final EIR. Chapter 2, Response to Comments. This chapter provides a list of agencies and organizations who commented on the Draft EIR, as well as copies of their comment letters received during the public review period, and individual responses to their comments. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project .. .............._. _� -� .....---. ,...„.._ .....---- 1 ------- August 20i55 Final EIR 1, Introduction Chapter 3, Revisions to the Draft EIR. This chapter contains minor revisions made to the Draft EIR as a result of the comments received by agencies and organizations as described in Chapter 3, and/or errors and omissions discovered subsequent to release of the Draft EIR for public review. These minor revisions clarify, amplify, or make insignificant changes to the EIR. Revisions to the EIR have not resulted in new significant impacts or mitigation measures or increased the severity of an impact. The City of Baldwin Park has determined that none of the revisions made to the Draft EIR constitutes significant new information that requires recirculation of the Draft EIR for further public comment under CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5. The additional material clarifies existing information presented in the Draft EIR, and does not present any new substantive information. None of this new material indicates that the project would result in a significant new environmental impact not previously disclosed in the Draft EIR. Additionally, none of this material indicates that there would be a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified environmental impact that would not be mitigated, or that there would be any of the other circumstances requiring recirculation described in Section 15088.5. CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5(a): (a) A lead agency is required to recirculate an EIR when significant new information is added to the EIR after public notice is given of the availability of the draft EIR for public review under Section 15087 but before certification... "Significant new information" requiring recirculation include, for example, a disclosure showing that: (1) A new significant environmental impact would result from the project or from a new mitigation measure proposed to be implemented. (2) A substantial increase in the severity of an environmental impact would result unless mitigation measures are adopted that reduce the impact to a level of insignificance. (3) A feasible project alternative or mitigation measure considerably different from the others previously analyzed would clearly lessen the environmental impacts of the project, but the project's proponents decline to adopt it. (4) The draft EIR was so fundamentally and basically inadequate and conclusory in nature that meaningful public review and comment were precluded. The revisions compiled in Chapter 3 do not constitute "Significant new information" noted in Section 15088.5(a)(1) since no new significant environmental impacts have been identified following the publication of the Draft PEIR. The revisions compiled in this Chapter do not constitute "Significant new information" noted in Section 15088.5(a)(2) since none of the modifications would result in a substantial increase in impacts already identified. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 1-2 August 2015 Final EBR 1. Introduction The revisions compiled in this Chapter do not constitute "Significant new information" noted in Section 15088.5(a)(3) since no new alternatives have been identified that would clearly lessen impacts. Finally, the revisions compiled in this Chapter do not constitute "Significant new information" noted in Section 15088.5(a)(4) since the Draft EIR is not fundamentally and basically inadequate and conclusory in nature. The Draft EIR compiles information available at the time of publication to assist in evaluating the values and risks of moving forward. Chapter 4, Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program. This chapter includes the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP). CEQA requires lead agencies to "adopt a reporting and mitigation monitoring program for the changes to the project which it has adopted or made a condition of project approval in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment" (CEQA Section 21081.6, CEQA Guidelines Section 15097). The MMRP was prepared based on the mitigation measures included in this Final EIR and has been included as Chapter 4.0. CEQA Requirements Regarding Comments and CEQA Guidelines Section 15204(a) outlines parameters for submitting comments, and reminds persons and public agencies that the focus of review and comment of Draft EIRs should be "on the sufficiency of the document in identifying and analyzing the possible impacts on the environment and ways in which the significant effects of the project might be avoided or mitigated. Comments are most helpful when they suggest additional specific alternatives or mitigation measures that would provide better ways to avoid or mitigate the significant environmental effects." CEQA Guidelines Section 15204(c) further advises, "Reviewers should explain the basis for their comments, and should submit data or references offering facts, reasonable assumptions based on facts, or expert opinion supported by facts in support of the comments. Pursuant to Section 15064, an effect shall not be considered significant in the absence of substantial evidence. " Section 15204 (d) also states, "Each responsible agency and trustee agency shall focus its comments on environmental information germane to that agency's statutory responsibility. " Section 15204 (e) states, "This section shall not be used to restrict the ability of reviewers to comment on the general adequacy of a document or of the lead agency to reject comments not focused as recommended by this section." Lead agencies are required to evaluate all comments on environmental issues received on the Draft PEIR and prepare a written response pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15088. Written responses should address the environmental issue(s) raised and provide a detailed response. Rationale must be provided when specific comments or suggestions (e.g., additional mitigation measures) are not accepted. In addition, the written response must be a good faith and reasoned analysis. As long as a good faith effort at full disclosure is made in the EIR (CEQA Guidelines Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 1-3 August 2015 Final EIR 1. Introduction 'S—U—M-5=414), Yeact agwicies TIEU, 1 IF: VM=e in with the project and do not need to provide all the information requested by commenters. In accordance with CEQA, Public Resources Code (PkC) Section 21092.5, copies of the written responses to public agencies will be forwarded to those agencies at least 10 days prior to certification of the environmental impact report. Baldwin Park TOD SpecIfic Plan Project 1-4 August 2015 Final EIR CHAPTER 2 Response to Comments Section 15088 of the CEQA Guidelines requires the lead agency, the City of Baldwin Park, to evaluate comments on environmental issues received from public agencies and interested parties who reviewed the Draft EIR and prepare written responses. This section provides all written responses received on the Draft EIR and the City of Baldwin Park's responses to each comment. Comment letters and specific comments are given letters and numbers for reference purposes. The following is a list of agencies, organizations and individuals that submitted comments on the Draft EIR during the public review period. Comments received on the Draft EIR and responses to those comments are shown on the following pages. Reference Agency/Organization/Resident Name Date of Comment Caltrans California Department of Transportation June 12, 2015 Caltrans California Department of Transportation July 30, 2015 Metrolink Metrolink June 22, 2015 PUC State of California Public Utilities Commission June 25, 2015 San Districts County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County June 22, 2015 SCH State Clearinghouse and Planning Unit June 16, 2015 JIVIA Juliet M. Arroyo June 22, 2015 Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 2-1 August 2015 Final EIR Ms. Amy Harbin June 12, 2015 Page 2 of 3 Caltrans is concerned that the freeway ramps will back up, creating a potentially unsafe condition. To ensure the ramps do not back up, which would potentially create a safety issue, the intersections adjacent to the ramps must be able to absorb the off -ramp volumes at the same time as they serve local circulation and land uses. Queuing analysis capacity of the off -ramp should be calculated by the actual length of the off - ramp between the terminuses to the gore point with 30 feet per car. The queue length should be calculated from the traffic counts, actual signal timing and the percent of truck assignments to the ramp with a passenger car equivalent factor of 3.0 (worst case scenario). The analyzed result may need to be calibrated with actual signal timing when necessary. Please include mitigation measures if forecasted vehicle queues are expected to exceed 85% of the total available storage capacity such that the storage will allow a 15% safety factor. It is also recommended that the City determine whether project -related plus cumulative traffic is expected to cause long queues on the on and off -ramps. 3 Caltrans is concerned that the project impacts may result in unsafe conditions due to additional traffic congestion, unsafe queuing, and difficult l;naneuvering. These concerns need to be adequately addressed in the EIR. In summary, without the necessary traffic analysis, Caltrans 4 cannot recognize the TS and DEIR as adequately identifying and mitigating the project's impacts to the State highway facilities. As a reminder, Caltrans encourages the City to work with neighboring developing cities such as City of Whittier to resolve any cumulative significant traffic impacts on the State facilities. The plan to work with the neighboring cities should be discussed in the Circulation Element of the General Plan or a new Resolution/Policy should be passed such as follows: • The City will work with neighboring cities to address cumulative significant traffic impact on freeway I-10, I-210, and I-605, and on/off ramps as a result of build out of the General Plan and Specific Plan. • The City will work with Caltrans to identify potential cumulative traffic impact and mitigation measures. • The City will form a fair share. fee program working with neighboring cities to improve the State facilities. • The City traffic impact fees will include any State facility improvement as part of the cumulative traffic impact. Procuring funds toward freeway segments, freeway interchanges, freeway on/off-ramps, as well as for bus and rail transit facilities will be in the goals of the City. Project coordinator, Mr. Alan Lin, left you 3 voice messages between 6/8/15 and 6/12/15, we would like to formally invite the lead agency, City of Baldwin Park to discuss traffic impacts, and traffic mitigation alternatives which may include fair share contributions towards planned or future freeway improvements within the City. Please contact this office at your earliest convenience to schedule a meeting in the near future. "Caltrans Inwmm enob!!!ty across Caltrornia" 5 0 MKrUT"T "I junel2,2615 Page 3 of 3 if you have any questions, pleqse fool free to cmitact Alon Lin the project coordinator at (213) 897-8391 and refer to lGrVCEQA No. 150513AL. Sincerely, DIANNA WATSON IGR/CEQA Branch, Chief RMMm=- *'Callram lmywoves mohohlyacronCellifor"b 0 2. Response to Comments California Department of Transportation (June 12, 2015) Caltrans 1-1 Page 46 of the Traffic Study explains that the assignment of trips to the freeways was based on the trip distribution discussed earlier in the report. On pages 35 and 36 of the Traffic Study it was explained that "the likely distribution of project trips was identified based on the types of land uses in the project, the likely origins and destinations of project residents and visitors, and the characteristics of the street system in the area of the project, ... and that the trip distribution was based largely on trip distribution information in the Los Angeles Congestion Management Program for the area of Baldwin Park (which are based on the distribution of population and employment in the broader region), as well as consideration of the more localized area adjacent to the Specific Plan area. The primary source was therefore a published and accepted source that is based on regional modeling information. The Traffic Study, on page 19, in its consideration of background future traffic volumes, included cumulative development through its use of regional growth forecasts. Thus, the traffic analysis presented in the Draft EIR addresses the cumulative effects of the development projects cited in Comment Caltrans 1-1. The Traffic Study, on page 46, estimated that future development within the Specific Plan area would add a maximum of 30 to 55 one-way trips per hour at any CMP monitoring location. Further review indicates an estimated maximum added trip volume of 72 trips per hour at any mainline freeway location as the result of the proposed Specific Plan. Added trips at most locations would represent less than one trip per minute, and at all locations, added Specific Plan - related traffic would represent less than 1% of total freeway volumes. Based on the trip distribution described in the Traffic Study and projected freeway volumes, following freeway ramps would be expected to be used by Specific Plan area traffic, with the following additional traffic volumes due to the new development within the Specific Plan area. Other freeway off -ramps would not be expected to be used as they would not be on convenient access routes to the project area. In the AM peak hour, Specific Plan generated trip totals would be negligible. In the PM peak hour, added Specific Plan area traffic would be low — which, at a maximum, represent an average of one car per minute. It is therefore unlikely that they would substantially add to traffic queues at the ramps. The concerns raised in Comment Caltrans 1-1 focus on cumulative conditions resulting from existing and project future traffic along State facilities. As noted Baldwin Park TOO Specific Plan Project 2-5 August 2015 Final EIR 2 Response to Comments above, the contribution of the proposed Specific Plan area is low in the PM peak hour and negligible in the AM peak hour. In addition, as noted in Response Caltrans 1-5, the proposed Baldwin Park Down TOD Specific Plan represents a significant reduction in the amount of development (and resulting traffic) that would be permitted within the specific plan area as compared to the City's existing General Plan and zoning, and is designed to the increase use of transit and non -motorized transit. The City's commitment to address improvements needed due to existing and future development in the region is set forth in Response Caltrans 1-5. Caltrans 1-2 The Specific Plan area is located approximately 1.4 to 1.8 miles from I-10 freeway ramps, 2.2 to 2.5 miles from 1-605 ramps, and 4.5 miles from I-210 ramps. Of the three ramps with the highest projected Specific Plan traffic volumes, the I-10 EB off -ramp at Baldwin Park Boulevard provides approximately 1,000 feet of storage, the I-10 WB off -ramp at Pacific Avenue provides approximately 1,150 feet of storage, and the I-605 NB off -ramp at Ramona Avenue provides approximately 1,650 feet of storage. Given the distance from the Specific Plana area to the freeway ramps, the low traffic volumes projected to use the ramps, and the storage capacities of the ramps, it is unlikely that proposed Specific Plan development would add substantially to any queues on the ramps. This conclusion is supported by the results documented in the Traffic Study showing there would be no unmitigated significant traffic impacts on streets and intersections in and around the Specific Plan area, where project traffic would be at its highest and most concentrated. It can therefore be concluded that traffic impacts would diminish with increasing distance from the Specific Plan area, due to an increasing number of roadway options for travel resulting in lower concentrations of Specific Plan area traffic volumes. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 2-6 August 2015 Final EIR AM Peak PM Peak Off -Ramp Hour Trips s Hour Tri P I -lo EB at Baldwin Park 4 55 I-zo EB at Puente Avenue 1 9 1-3-o WB at Pacific Avenue 4 63 1-605 NB at Ramona 5 72 I-605 SB at Arrow H iclliway z ..... 30 mm .. 1-23.o at WB at Irwindale 1 15 above, the contribution of the proposed Specific Plan area is low in the PM peak hour and negligible in the AM peak hour. In addition, as noted in Response Caltrans 1-5, the proposed Baldwin Park Down TOD Specific Plan represents a significant reduction in the amount of development (and resulting traffic) that would be permitted within the specific plan area as compared to the City's existing General Plan and zoning, and is designed to the increase use of transit and non -motorized transit. The City's commitment to address improvements needed due to existing and future development in the region is set forth in Response Caltrans 1-5. Caltrans 1-2 The Specific Plan area is located approximately 1.4 to 1.8 miles from I-10 freeway ramps, 2.2 to 2.5 miles from 1-605 ramps, and 4.5 miles from I-210 ramps. Of the three ramps with the highest projected Specific Plan traffic volumes, the I-10 EB off -ramp at Baldwin Park Boulevard provides approximately 1,000 feet of storage, the I-10 WB off -ramp at Pacific Avenue provides approximately 1,150 feet of storage, and the I-605 NB off -ramp at Ramona Avenue provides approximately 1,650 feet of storage. Given the distance from the Specific Plana area to the freeway ramps, the low traffic volumes projected to use the ramps, and the storage capacities of the ramps, it is unlikely that proposed Specific Plan development would add substantially to any queues on the ramps. This conclusion is supported by the results documented in the Traffic Study showing there would be no unmitigated significant traffic impacts on streets and intersections in and around the Specific Plan area, where project traffic would be at its highest and most concentrated. It can therefore be concluded that traffic impacts would diminish with increasing distance from the Specific Plan area, due to an increasing number of roadway options for travel resulting in lower concentrations of Specific Plan area traffic volumes. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 2-6 August 2015 Final EIR 2. Response to Comments No factual evidence is provided in this Comment to substantiate a conclusion that traffic on freeways ramps will back up onto the mainline, creating potentially unsafe conditions. See also Response Caltrans 1-5.,. Caltrans 1-3 See Response Caltrans 1-2. Caltrans 1-4 Comment Caltrans 1-4 offers no factual evidence regarding a potential for additional traffic to create unsafe conditions or queuing, or difficult maneuvering. The information provided in Response 1-2 indicates that such conditions would not result from development of the proposed Specific Plan, due to low projected additional volumes being generated within the Specific Plan area. Caltrans concern about "difficult maneuvering" is not an issue because the freeway ramps were designed and constructed by Caltrans to Caltrans standards, are operated by Caltrans, and the project proposes no change to their physical characteristics. Caltrans 1-5 Approval of the proposed Baldwin Park Down TOD Specific Plan represents a significant reduction in the amount of development (and resulting traffic) that would be permitted within the specific plan area as compared to the City's existing General Plan and zoning. Thus, the traffic -related impacts of the proposed Specific Plan would be substantially less than those analyzed in the City's certified General Plan EIR. In addition, the proposed project is specifically designed to reduce reliance on automobile travel by improving connectivity of the Downtown area to transit and by providing a mix of uses that would encourage walking and bicycle travel within the Downtown area, consistent. Thus, the overall effect of the proposed Specific Plan is to reduce reliance on automobile travel and reduce vehicle miles travelled, as called for in the required Sustainable Communities Strategy adopted for the San Gabriel Valley consistent with the provisions of AB 32 and SB 375. By increasing connectivity to transit and enhancing opportunities for pedestrian and bicycle travel, the proposed Downtown Baldwin Park Specific Plan is consistent with the intent of SB 743 to reduce future miles travelled. While the City of Baldwin Park will pursue General Plan policies aimed at establishing multi jurisdictional funding programs for improvements to State facilities, such programs would not constitute "mitigation" under CEQA, since Caltrans has no concrete plans for use of locally -generated funds to make actual physical improvements to specific State facilities. Nevertheless, the City of Baldwin Park will pursue inclusion in its General Plan of policies to: Work with neighboring cities to address the cumulative traffic affects of future development on the I-10, I-210, and I-605 freeways, including the freeway mainlines, interchanges, and on- and off -ramps. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 2-7 August 2015 Final EIR 2. Response to Comments • Work with Caltrans to identify the improvements to the I-10, I-210, and I-605 freeways, including the freeway mainlines, interchanges, and on - and off -ramps needed to for existing and projected future development within the San Gabriel Valley. • Work with the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG) to establish local funding mechanisms to supplement federal, state, and regional funding for improvements to the I-10, I-210, and I-605 freeways, including the freeway mainlines, interchanges, and on- and off -ramps. • Work with the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG) to establish local funding mechanisms to supplement federal, state, and regional funding for transit facilities. • Require consultation with Caltrans regarding the need for a traffic study addressing state facilities for all future projects defined as being of statewide, regional, or areawide significant per CEQA Guidelines Section 15206(b). • Work with Caltrans where appropriate and applicable to evaluate access management needs and strategies to better manage traffic operations on arterial streets located within close proximity of freeway off -ramps in an effort to reduce the potential for traffic backups and friction at Caltrans ramp signals. Caltrans 1-6 Comment Caltrans 1-6 does not raise any significant environmental issues regarding the Draft EIR or its analyses and conclusions. The meeting requested by Caltrans was held July 23, 2015, and is summarized in Caltrans' July 30, 2015 memo. See Comments and Responses 2-1 through 2-10. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 2-8 August 2015 Final EIR From: Lin, Alan S@DOT [mailt,,,:alan.11cxdot. a g ] Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 3:42 PM To: Amy Harbin Cc: Watson, DiAnna@DOT; Young, Kenneth C@DOT; Alvarez, Elmer P@DOT; Ansarie, Rashid L@DOT Subject: Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan Hi Amy, Please forward this email to your team. I have attached the sign -in sheet for your record. It certainly is our pleasure to meet with the City staff and the consultants last Thursday, 7/23/15. Here is a meeting summary, feel free to add or send feedback to us. 1. Caltrans did not receive NOP from the City or State Clearinghouse. City assumes that Caltrans N will receive a copy from the State Clearinghouse. 2. Caltrans mailing address is not in the City's agency circulation sheet. City will add Caltrans's 2 address to the list and make sure to send a copy of an environmental document to Caltrans from now on. This will solve the disconnect communication between two agencies. 3. The City does not have traffic impact studies guideline. However, the City uses the County's 3 Traffic Impact Analysis Report Guidelines. 4. The City does not have a threshold for the State facilities. However, City follows the 2010 4 Congestion Management Program (CMP). 5. The consultant is aware that Caltrans does not use CMP when analyzing the freeway because it does not provide any analysis when the trips is less than 150 vehicles on the freeway and 50 5 trips on the highway and the LOS is F. 6. Caltrans has concerns for the off -ramps when the traffic may back up to the mainline and thus 6 causing potential traffic rear -end accident. Therefore, a queuing analysis is required in a traffic study. 7. A case study, Millennium Hollywood Project, is presented to the City that when an adequate traffic study is not prepared on the State facilities, a third party may take legal action against 7 developer and/or agency. Caltrans role is to ensure the environmental document is defensible to the public. 8. Caltrans presented few more case studies from the City of Irwindale, City of Pasadena, and the 8 County of Los Angeles that few Lead Agencies sample responses/solutions are prepared from the effort in working with Caltrans closely. 9. Potential congestion solutions for the specific plan could be the new policies to the General Plan, corridor study with neighboring cities, queuing analysis for the specific projects, g amendments to the existing used traffic guidelines, working with regional agencies, etc. 10. Both agencies are committed in working together. The City now has enough information to make adequate response to Caltrans. Caltrans is willing to review and send feedback when a 10 draft response to comment is available. Please feel free to add/change any comment. Thankyou! Alan Lin, P.E. Project Coordinator State of California Department of Transportation District 7, Office of Transportation Planning Mail Station 16 100 South Main Street Los Angeles, CA 90012 (213) 897-8391 Office (213) 897-1337 Fax California Department of Transportation (July 30, 2015) Caltrans 2-1 The Notice of Preparation (NOP) was transmitted to the California State Clearinghouse for distribution to State agencies in compliance with the provisions of CEQA. The Clearinghouse's website indicates that the NOP was, in fact, transmitted to Caltrans, Division of Transportation Planning and Caltrans, District 7. That Caltrans might not have received the NOP is beyond the City's control, and does not affect the adequacy of the Draft EIR or its analyses and conclusions. Caltrans 2-2 Although not required by CEQA, the City will transmit the Final EIR and future CEQA and public hearing notices directly to Caltrans, District 7 in addition to the required transmittals to the State Clearinghouse. Caltrans 2-3 Comment Caltrans 2-3 provides a summary of the basis for the methodology used for traffic analysis in the Draft EIR. This comment does not raise any significant environmental issues regarding the adequacy of the Draft EIR or its analyses and conclusions. Caltrans 2-4 Comment Caltrans 2-4 provides a summary of the basis for the methodology used for traffic analysis of state facilities used in the Draft EIR. It should also be noted that Caltrans also does not have thresholds for significance of impacts on State facilities. This comment does not raise any significant environmental issues regarding the adequacy of the Draft EIR or its analyses and conclusions. Caltrans 2-5 See Response Caltrans 2-4. The threshold for analysis noted in Comment Caltrans 2-5 is a commonly used threshold employed not only by the City of Baldwin Park, but also by cities throughout Los Angeles County. It provides a reasonable basis for screening out projects that would not result in significant impacts on State facilities. It is the responsibility of the Lead Agency (i.e. City of Baldwin Park) under CEQA to determine the procedures/methodology to be used in environmental studies. While Caltrans may request a Lead Agency use Caltrans guidelines or recommended methodologies, it is the Lead Agency's responsibility to determine appropriate methodologies to be used in the EIR. Caltrans 2-6 See Responses Caltrans 1-2, Caltrans 1-3, and Caltrans 1-3 Caltrans 2-7 Comment Caltrans 2-7 refers to a legal challenge to an environmental impact report prepared for an unrelated project by another lead agency, the City of Los Angeles. See Responses Caltrans 1-1 through Caltrans 1-5 for discussion regarding the adequacy of the traffic analysis set forth in the Draft EIR. Pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, it is the responsibility of the Lead Agency, in this case the City of Baldwin Park, to ensure the adequacy of the EIR under the law. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 2-12 August 2015 Final EIR 2. Response to Comments Caltrans 2-8 The "case studies" provided by Caltrans in a July 23 meeting with the City of Baldwin Park represented examples of General Plan policies to which the three agencies cited in Comment 2-8 agreed to pursue. See Response Caltrans 1-5 for discussion of the General Plan policies recommended by Caltrans. In its July 23 meeting with Caltrans staff, the City expressed its willingness to pursue funding programs for State facilities similar to that being requested by Caltrans in its comment letters. The City noted that the most appropriate forum for adoption of such a funding program would be through the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG), which is a joint powers authority made up of representatives from 31 cities (including Baldwin Park), three Los Angeles County Supervisorial Districts, and the three Municipal Water Districts serving the San Gabriel Valley. The SGVCOG would be the appropriate forum for such a funding program because (1) a substantial portion of the need for improvements along the I-10 freeway is attributable to existing conditions and not future development projects, (2) no one development project or combination of development projects in any single municipality along the I-10 freeway would result in great enough impacts or require sufficient mitigation to provide funding of any meaningful physical improvements along the I-10 freeway, and (3) as discussed in Responses Caltrans 1-1 through Caltrans 1-5, the proposed Specific Plan project would not result in significant impacts on State facilities requiring mitigation. Caltrans 2-9 See Response Caltrans 2-8. Caltrans 2-10 Comment Caltrans 2-10 does not raise any significant environmental issues regarding the Draft EIR or its analyses and conclusions. The City of Baldwin Park has expressed its willingness to work with Caltrans and establish needed funding mechanisms through appropriate means. See also Response Caltrans 2-8. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 2-13 Augusl2015 Final EIR Comment Letter: Metrolink ■ Southern California Regional Rail Authority June 22, 2015 Ms. Amy L. Harbin City Planner City of Baldwin Park 14403 East Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, CA 91706 RE: CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DOWNTOWN TOD SPECIFIC PLAN - DEIR Dear Ms. Harbin: The Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) has received the DEIR for the City of Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan as a follow-up to the NOP for the DEIR back in January of this year. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on key issues relative to SCRRA and operations of the railroad adjacent to the project site,. As background information, SCRRA is a five -county Joint Powers Authority (JPA) 'that operates the regional commuter rail system known as Metrolink. Additionally, SCRRA provides rail engineering, construction, operations and maintenance services to its five JPA member agencies. 'n, e JPA consists of the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (METRO), San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG), Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), Riverside County Transportation Commission (ROTC) and Ventura County Transportation Commission (VCTC). The railroad right of way portion adjacent to the proposed project is operated and maintained by SCRRA and owned by Metro. The proposed TOD Specific Plan boundaries also incorporate the at -grade railroad crossings of Ramona Boulevard and Pacific Avenues. Our previous comments on the topics raised in the NOP noted in our letter of February 3, 2015 and also shown again in Table 1.1 and Appendix A of this DEIR still stand. Please note that these were initial general comments submitted to meet the public comment period. SCRRA may follow up with more specific comments for consideration if further analysis deems it necessary. One Gateway Plaza, Floor 12 Los Angeles, CA 90012 T (213) 452,0200 metrolinktrains.com Ms. Amy L. Harbin Page 2 June 22, 2015 Additional comments on the TOD Specific Plan are as follows: 1. The Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) is the Joint Powers Authority (JPA) that operates and maintains the commuter rail service known as Metrolink. SCRRA should be included on the Acronym page of the document. 2. For future mailings on NOP's and DEIR's please mail to ; tro" at ' .8 DepAItmDA,s :.. 531776. Lg§_Mg_qles. CA 90053-17X 3. We are encouraged to see that the Specific Plan would generate a walkable TOD with safe and improved pedestrian access to the existing Metrolink Station. SCRRA Engineering staff will work closely with city staff to ensure that the at -grade vehicular or pedestrian crossings of the railroad at Ramona Blvd. and Pacific Avenue are designed and built to our new standards to improve safety for all involved. As noted in Chapter 2 on page 2-17 these improvements could include four quadrant gates and pedestrian gates along with channelization/fencing. A reminder that these safety enhancements and standards can be found in a document entitled SCRRA Rail Highway Grade Crossing Recommended Design Practices and Guidelines on our website at www.artetr+ linktrains.c ix . 4. In Chapter 3, Section 3.1 Aesthetics, please note that large trees and vegetation should be discouraged in the sidewalk or raised median islands areas within close proximity of the rail lines so as not to obstruct the sight visibility to the railroad signals and gates. Low vegetation would be preferred in these areas near the railroad, 5. The at -grade railroad crossing of Ramona Blvd. is very complex with multiple roadways intersecting with the rail line. As this street is a major arterial for the city we would like to note that this could be a candidate for a future grade separated crossing. In the interim, major safety enhancements as previously noted (four quadrant and pedestrian gates) should be include in the planning of this Downtown TOD Specific Plan. Traffic signal modifications, such as improved advanced preemption and timing improvements should be looked at as well. 2 3 4 k, City shall provide timely notice, in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21092.5 and State CEQA Guideline Section 15088, of the written proposed responses to our comments on this environmental document 6 and the time and place of any scheduled public meetings or public hearings by the agency decision makers at least 10 days prior to such a meeting. Thank you again for cooperating with SCRRA to help ensure the development of a successful project. If you have any questions regarding these comments please contact me at 213-452-0456 or via e-mail at mathieur@scrra.net. StaA y thiet, Sr. Public Project Specialist Cc: Roderick Diaz, SCRRA Patricia Watkins, SCRRA Scott Johnson, SCRRA Don Sepulveda, Metro Xin Tong, Metro 2. Response to Comments Metrolink Metrolink -1 The comment states that the Specific Plan area includes railroad right of way and at -grade crossings that are maintained by the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) and owned by Metro. The comment also states that comments to the Notice of Preparation (NOP) related to visual, noise, and pedestrian safety rail were provided. The City recognizes SCRRA and Metro's authority in relation to rail easements and crossings, and will ensure that SCRRA and Metro's requirements are included as part of future development projects near rail rights-of-way. In consideration of the SCRAA NOP comment letter, impacts related to the existing rail facilities and services were included in the EIR. Metro's comment was as follows, "considering the proximity of the Downtown TOD Specific Plan to the tracks you can expect train noise and visual impacts. Sound walls and proper paned windows are encouraged on future construction within the areas around the railroad. These developments would generate more pedestrian and vehicular trnl'tic in the armi and cotald impact the safety at the existing at grade railroad crossings at l aanaona Boulevaard® Considerations should be made to include additional safety enhancements such as pedestrian channelization and gates at the existing railroad crossing as needed". Noise impacts from the project are addressed 3.8 Noise, Section 3.8.5 Noise Impact Analyses, Impact 3.8-1, beginning on page 3.8-23. Because mixed use developments involving residential uses are proposed adjacent to, and in the immediate vicinity of, the Metrolink line, the noise generated by trains traveling through the Specific Plan area daily (along with the sounding of horns as the trains approach the Baldwin Park Metrolink Station) would result in a noise environment that is generally not compatible with residential land uses. Implementation of Mitigation Measure NOI-5 would require all future cJevelopmejats thaat inclUde residential uses that are located within 500 beet of the Metrolink line ensure that individual development projects would implement al:aproptiate laarrd use planning for exterior private areas, nand in,ilplement noise reduction treasures, such as sound walls, double pane windows, and insulation features included in the design to meet the City's the interior noise standards of 45 dBA CNEL. With implementation of Mitigation Measure NOI-5, development projects that would occur by the proposed Specific Plan would not conflict with the City's noise regulations, and impacts would be less than significant. Visual impacts from the project are addressed 3.1 Aesthetics, Section 3.1.5 Aesthetics Impact Analyses, Impact 3.1-2, beginning on page 3.1-17. The Specific Plan would enhance, not degrade, the visual character and quality of the area. The Specific Plan provides design guidelines to enhance the pedestrian ...-- m ,...... �, Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 2-16 August 2015 Final EIR 2. Response to Comments experience in these areas, including the incorporation of architectural elements on the facades, height and massing recommendations, and architectural style guidelines. The development standards, design guidelines, and streetscape improvements would achieve a unifying and identifying character to the Downtown area. Overall, while the Specific Plan would alter the existing visual character of the Specific Plan area, it would not substantially degrade the area or the surrounding area. Impacts related to visual quality and character would be less than significant. The proposed Specific Plan would redesign some intersections to slow traffic speed, thereby increasing pedestrian and vehicle safety. All development within the Specific Plan would be required to be consistent with City street, sidewalk and public place design standards (outlined in Chapter 97 of the City Municipal Code). As a result, implementation of the proposed Specific Plan would result in less than -significant impacts associated with potential traffic safety design hazards. Metrolink -2 The comment states that the SCRRA is the Joint Powers Authority that operates and maintains the Metrolink rail service and that SCRAA should be added to the Acronym page of the document and that the Metrolink Planning address should be updated. Pursuant to this comment, the Acronym page of the EIR has been updated as shown in Chapter 3, Revisions to the Draft EIR and the Final EIR will be mailed to the address provided. Metrolink -3 The comment states that SCRRA Engineering staff will work with the City to ensure that at grade vehicular crossings of the rail line at Ramona Boulevard and Pacific Avenue are designed pursuant to current standards, which can be found on the Metrolink website. The City agrees that any vehicular crossings of rail lines would be developed by coordinating with SCRRA Engineering staff and pursuant to the most up-to-date safety standards. Metrolink -4 The comment states that large trees are discouraged in sidewalks or raised median areas that are in close proximity to rail lines, to ensure that vegetation does not obstruct visibility of railroad signs and gates. The proposed Specific Plan does not include detailed landscaping design plans for areas near rail facilities but does identify tree types for each street. Any improvements to rail crossings, sidewalks, and raised medians would be designed to provide vehicular and pedestrian safety in compliance with the SCRRA's safety standards, which include appropriate line of sight standards related to safety. The City recognizes that SCRRA and Metrolink operating practices are Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 2-17 August 2095 Final EIR 2. Response to Comments regulated by the PUC and requires SCRRA, Metrolink and PUC's approval authority in relation to rail crossing improvements. The City will ensure that the appropriate approvals are requested through coordination with SCRRA, Metrolink and PUC staff as part of future development projects that involve rail crossings. Metrolink -5 The comment states that the at -grade rail crossing of Ramona Boulevard is complex and could be a future candidate for a grade separated crossing. The comment further states that the four quadrant and pedestrian gate safety enhancements should be included in the Specific Plan, and that traffic signal modifications should be reviewed. A grade separated crossing has not been planned at Ramona Boulevard. As described on page 2-17 of the Draft EIR, the proposed Specific Plan includes coordination with Metrolink for installation of full quad -gate crossings that extend across the entire street (unlike the current half gates that only extend across half the street) on Pacific Avenue west of the Metrolink Station, and on Downing Avenue east of the station. The full quad gates would improve traffic safety because their length would cross the entire track, thereby preventing vehicles to cross the tracks while the gates are down. Reviews of traffic signal functioning and the need for new traffic signals is an ongoing function of the City of Baldwin Park Street Design and Engineering Department. Should changes to signal timing or other signal modifications be necessary, it would be implemented along with the quad -gate crossing improvements. In addition, the City will coordinate with Metrolink, should Metrolink consider a grade separated crossing in the future. Metrolink -6 The comment states that the City shall provide timely notice of responses to these comments and the time and place of any scheduled public meetings or hearings at least 10 days prior to meeting pursuant to the Public Resources Code and State CEQA Guidelines. The City is providing responses to all of the written comments received to the Draft EIR as part of this Final EIR. These responses will be sent to each public agency commenter at least 10 days prior to the City's Planning Commission meeting that considers adoption of the proposed Specific Plan and EIR. This EIR has been prepared and shall be distributed pursuant to the applicable state laws and guidelines, including CEQA and the Public Resources Code Section 21092.5. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 2-18 August 2615 Final EIR Comment Letter: Public Utilities Commission EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Govemor STATE OF CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 320 WEST 4TH STREET, SUITE 500 LOS ANGELES, CA 90013 June 25, 2015 Ms. Amy Harbin, City Planner City of Baldwin Park 14403 East Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, CA 91706 SCH 2014121098 — Downtown Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Specific Plan — City of Baldwin Park, County of Los Angeles Dear Ms. Harbin: The California Public Utilities Commission (Commission) has jurisdiction over the safety of highway - rail crossings (crossings) in California. The California Public Utilities Code requires Commission approval for the construction or alteration of crossings and grants the Commission exclusive power on the design, alteration and closure of crossings. The Commission's Rail Crossings and Engineering Branch (RCEB) is in receipt of the Draft Environmental hripact Report (DEIR) for the proposed Downtown TOD Specific Plan in the City of Baldwin Park (City). According to the DEIN, the City's proposed Downtown TOD Specific Plan would guide future TOD in the specific plan area, provide for a mix of residential, employment, retail and public uses in the downtown area and improve access to various modes of transportation, including transit, walking and bicycling, The Pacific Avenue and Ramona Boulevard at -grade crossings (CPUC No. 101 SG - 18.71 & DOI' No. 747281C and CPUC No. 101 SG -18.98 & DOT No. 747282J respectively) are within the proposed project area. Currently, there are approximately 40 train movements per day, at a maximum speed of 70 miles per hour. Any roadway modification adjacent to or near the railroad right-of-way (ROW) should be planned with the safety of the rail corridor in mind. The increase traffic volumes Would not only be on streets and at intersections, but also at any adjacent at -grade rail crossing, Language should be in place so that any traffic impact studies undertaken should also address rail crossing safety analysis and associated proposed mitigation measures. Safety analysis should include queuing on tracks, pedestrian movements, turning movements and sightlines. Additional safety improvernent measures may include the planning for grade separations for major thoroughfares, improvements to existing at -grade highway -rail crossings due to increase in traffic volumes (e.g., addition or upgrade of crossing warning devices, active and passive signs, and channelization fencing). In addition, any modification to an existing public rail crossing requires authorization from the Commission. RCEB representatives are available for consultation on any potential safety impacts 2 or concerns at crossings. Please continue to keep RCEB informed of the project's development. More information can be found at: ht_tp.-/1www.0u_ig,gAgpv/PL si C/satgy/Rail/Cros_ PL __ J _n_gs1indexhtrn• If you have any questions, please contact at (213) 576-5766. Sincerely, Chi Cheung To, P.E. Utilities Engineer Rail Crossings and Engineering Branch Safety and Enforcement Division 2. Response to Comments State of California Public Utilities Commission PUC -1 The comment states that the Pacific Avenue and Ramona Boulevard at -grade crossings (CPUC No. 101 SG -18.71 & DOT No. 747281C and CPUC No. 101 SG -18.98 & DOT No. 747282J respectively) are within the Specific Plan area and are utilized by approximately 40 train movements per day, at a maximum speed of 70 miles per hour. Any roadway modification adjacent to or near the railroad right-of-way should be planned with the safety of the rail corridor in mind, including queuing on tracks, pedestrian movements, turning movements and sightlines; and that safety improvement measures may include a variety of measures. Approval of the proposed Baldwin Park Downtown TOD Specific Plan represents a significant reduction in the amount of development (and resulting traffic) that would be permitted within the Specific Plan area, compared to the City's existing General Plan and zoning. Thus, the traffic -related impacts of the proposed Specific Plan would be substantially less than those analyzed in the City's certified General Plan EIR. In addition, the proposed project is specifically designed to reduce reliance on automobile travel by improving connectivity of the Downtown area to transit and by providing a mix of uses that would encourage walking and bicycle travel within the Downtown area. Thus, the overall effect of the proposed Specific Plan is to reduce reliance on automobile travel and reduce vehicle miles travelled. The proposed roadway and pedestrian modifications included in the proposed Specific Plan that are near the existing rail facilities have been designed to enhance safety, including queuing on tracks, pedestrian movements, turning movements and sightlines. For example the Specific Plan includes clearly defined pedestrian paths to provide safe pedestrian passage, better fencing of the tracks, and working with SCRRA, Metrolink and the PUC to implement state of the art pedestrian safety features such as improved pedestrian control gates. It is anticipated that full quad -gate crossings on Pacific Avenue west of the Metrolink Station, and on Downing Avenue east of the Metrolink Station would be provided by Metrolink. These quad gates improve traffic safety as they prevent any traffic from crossing the tracks while the gates are down (whereas the half gates allow the possibility of traffic driving around Me gates). The sidewalks and truck stir face would also be unproved in those crc.rssirrg areas to enl-iri ice pedestrian crossings and connections, including highly visible zebra crosswalk striping and/or paving, pedestrian signals, and curb extensions. Thus, proposed Specific Plan facilitates implementation of additional safety improvements that are consistent in nature to those described in the comment. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 2-20 August2015 Final EIR to Comments PUC -2 The comment states that modification to an existing rail crossing requires authorization from the PUC, that consultation related to rail safety is available, and that rail safety information can be found on the agency's website. The City recognizes that Metrolink operating practices are regulated by the PUC and requires SCRRA, Metrolink and PUC's approval authority in relation to rail crossing improvements. The City will ensure that the appropriate approvals are requested through coordination with SCRRA, Metrolink and PUC staff as part of future development projects that involve rail crossings. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 2-21 August 2015 Final EIR COUNTY SAWFATION DISTRICTS OF 1..._O S ANGELES COUN-TY 1955 Workman Mill Road, WhiWei, CA 90601 �400 Moiling Address: P.0, Box 4996, Whither, CA 90607-4998 Telephone: 1562) 1x99-74'11, FAX: (562) 699-542? www,lacsd,org Ms, Amy L. Harbin, AICP City Planner Planning Division City of Baldwin Park 14403 East Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, CA 91706 Dear Ms. Harbin: GRACE ROBkISON HYDE Chief Engineer and General Manager June 22, 2015 Ref File No.: 3305800 poynto 'D XA T MMitqJrS&d Des The County Sanitation Districts of 1,os Angeles County (Districts) received a Draft Environmental Impact Report for the subject project on May 4, 2015. The proposed development is located within the jurisdictional boundaries of District No. 15. We offer the following comments and updates: WASTEWATER INFRASTRUCTURE, page, 3.12-17, paragraph I -- The para ph. states the "Specific Plan would result in wastewater generation of approximately 370,625 gallons per day, which is an increase of 216,634 gallons per day over existing conditions". The expected average wastewater flow from the proposed 833 dwelling units and 299,13 8 square feet ofnon-residential development, is 310,549 gallons per day, For a copy of the Districts' average wastewater generation factors, go to 1 •,,g, Wastewater & Sewer Systems, click on Will Serve Program,, and click on theLgading"f link: Tile Districts should review indivitival developments within the City in order to determine whether or not sufficient trunk sewer capacity exists to serve each project and if Districts' facilities will be affected by the project. 2. TABLE 3.12.8, ESTIMATED INCREASE IN WASTEWATER GENERAT10N, page 3.12-17 — The Total Increase provided in Table 3118 is, presented to be 216,634.1 gallons per day (gpd), Please revise this data based on, the expected average wastewater flow of 310,549 gallons per day presented in item no. I - 3, WASTEWATER INFRASTRUCTURE, page 3.12-17, paragraph 2 — The San Jose Creek Water Ieclaination Plant (WRP) currently processes an average flow of 713 million gallons per day (mgd). Please adjust the remaining calculations accordingly. 4. WASTEWATER ENFRASTRUCTURE, page 3.12-20, paragraph I — Refer to item nos. I and 2 in order to adjust figures accurately. DOC- 033561703)15 Recycled Paper co Ms. Amy L. Harbin -2- June 22,2015 ® WASTEWATER, page, 3.12-23, paragraph I ® As indicated in itern no. 1, the expected average wastewater:flow fi**m the proposed project is 310,549 gallons per day. ® AN other information concerning Districts' facilities and sewerage service contained in the document is current. If you have any questions, please coMact the undersigned at (562) 908-4288, extension 2717. very V* yours, Grace Rohimon, Hyde Adriana Raza Customer Scrvkc Specisilist Facilities Planning Department F41 2, Response to Comments County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County San Districts -1 The comment provides wastewater flow estimates that are less than those identified in the Draft EIR. The comment states that the Draft EIR estimated that 370,623 gallons per day of wastewater would be generated at build out of the Specific Plan; however, the Sanitation Districts estimate that approximately 310,549 gallons per day of wastewater would be generated. Build out of the proposed Specific Plan would result in wastewater generation of approximately 310,549 gallons per day, which is an increase of 170,678 gallons per day over existing conditions. Thus, the wastewater generated at build out of the proposed Specific Plan would be less than what was identified in the Draft EIR. Pursuant to these comments the appropriate text related to wastewater within Section 3.12 of the Draft EIR has been updated as shown in Chapter 3, Revisions to the Draft EIR, on page 3-2 of this Final EIR. Because the amount of wastewater generated at build out of the proposed Specific Plan would be less than what was identified in the Draft EIR, 170,678 gallons per day rather than 216,634 gallons per day, impacts related to wastewater would continue to be less than significant. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 2-24 August 2015 Final EIR .STATE .OF CALIFORN-IA Governor's Office of Planning and Research State Clearinghouse and Planning Unit Edmund G. Brown Jr. Ken Alex Governor Director June 16, 2015 Amy Harbin City of Baldwin Park 14403 E. Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, CA 91706 Subject; Downtown Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Specific Plan SCHM 2014121098 Dear Amy Harbin: The State Clearinghouse submitted the above named Draft EIR to selected state agencies for review. On the enclosed Document Details Report please. note that the Clearinghouse has listed the state agencies:that reviewed your document. The review period closed on Jinie 15, 2015, and the comir'ments from the responding agency (ics) is (are) enclosed. if'lbis comment package is riot in order, please notify the State Clearinghouse hninediately.. Please refer to the project's ten -digit State Clearinghouse number in future correspondence so that we may respond promptly. Please note that Section 21104(c) of the California Public Resources Code states that: "A responsible or other public agency shall only make substantive comments regarding those activities involved in a project which are within an area of expertise of the agency or which are required to be carried out or approved by the agency. Those comments shall be supported by specific documentation." These comments are forwarded for use in preparing your final environmental document. Should you need more information or clarification of the enclosed comments, we recommend that you contact the commenting agency directly. This letter acknowledges that you have complied with the State Clearinghouse review requirements for draft environmental documents, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Please contact the State Clearinghouse at (916) 445-0613 if you have any questions regarding the environmental review process. Sincerely, Scott Morgan Director, State Clearinghouse s° J it°u n a° r"Gill'; Enclosures cc: Resources Agency 1400 TENTH STREET P.O. BOX 3044 SACRAM-01 mrO, CALIFORNIA 95812-3044 TEL (916) 445-0613 J�AX (916) 323-3018 www.upr.ca.gov 1 Document Details Report State Clearinghouse Data Base SCH# 2014121098 Project Title Downtown Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Specific Plan Lead Agency Baldwin Park, City of Type EIR Draft EIR Description The proposed Downtown Transit Oriented Development Specific Plan would guide future transit -oriented development in the Specific Plan area and provides for a mix of residential, employment, retail, and public uses in the downtown area and would improve access to various modes of transportation. Including transit, walking and bicycling. The Specific Plan identifies sites that are underutilized and have the potential for redevelopment, Infill development, and/or adaptive reuse to better serve the downtown area. The proposed project would rezone areas to facilitate the TOD infill development and provides Improvements to existing circulation and a portion of one water distribution line. Lead Agency Contact Name Amy Harbin Agency City of Baldwin Park Phone 626 913 5261 Fax small Address 14403 E. Pacific Avenue City Baldwin Park State CA Zip 91706 Project Location County Los Angeles city Baldwin Park Region LatlLon,g 34' S' 11.71' N 1117' 57'37.31" W Cross Streets Ramona Boulevard and Maine Avenue Parcel No, Various Township Range Section Base Pro lmfty to Highways 1-605 and 10 Airports Rallwa�ys Metrolink lVaterwa,ys Dalton Wash Schools BP HS, Central, Vineland Land Use Neighborhood Commercial, General Commercial, Industrial Commercial, Multi -Family Residential, Mixed Use, Single Family Residential Project issues Air Quality, Archaeologic -Historic; Drainage/Absorption; Noise; Population/Housing Balance; Public Services; Recreation/Parks; Schools/Universltles; Sewer Capacity; Soil Erosion/Compaction/Grading; Solid Waste; Toxic/Hazardous; Traffic/Circulation; Water Quality; Water Supply; Growth Inducing; Landuse; Cumulative Effects Reviewing Resources Agency; Department of Fish and Wildlife, Region 5; Office of Historic Preservation,- Agencies reservation;Agencies Department of Parks and Recreation; Department of Water Resources; California Highway Patrol; Caltrans, District 7; Air Resources Board, Transportation Projects; Regional Water Quality Control Board, Region 4; Department of Toxic Substances Control; Native American Heritage Commission; Public Utilities Commission; San Gabriel & Lower Los Angeles Rivers & Mountains Conservancy Date Received 05/01/2015 Startof Review 05/01/2015 End of Review 06/15/2015 Note: Blanks in data fields result from insufficient information provided by lead agency. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 7, TRANSPORTATION PLANNING I(jR/CEQA BRANCH 100 MAIN s-mvr, ms # 16 LOS ANGELES, CA 90012-3606 PHOW (211) 997.9140 FAX: (213) 997-1337 June 12, 2015 Ms. Amy Harbin City of Baldwin Park 14403 East Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, CA 91706 Dear Ms. Harbin: (VEA-r— RECEIVED JUN 12 2015 STATE CLEARING HOUSE Ficeyourpower! Re eNerzy Ociewl RE: City of Baldwin Park Downtown Transit;Onented Development (TOD) Specific Plan SCH # 2014121098 Vic. LA -605, 10 IGWCEQA No, 150513AL-DEIR Thank you for including the California Department of Transportation (Caltranp) in '111e, environinerital review process for the above referenced .protect, The proposed downtown Tradsit Oriented Development (TOD) Specific Plan would guide futum transit -oriented dAvoloproe in the Specific Plan area and provides for a tnix i of residential,, employment, retail, and publio�: i in the downtown area atid would inipme access to various modes of tnutsportation, 1"Poluding" transit, walking and bicycling. From Table 4. 1, Baldwin Park Downtown Specific Plan -Land Use Summary from page 35, of Traffic Study (TS), prepared on February 20, 2015, the proposed Specific Platt is foreogst to build additional 831 additional residential units and additional 289,138 square feet qoh- residential development. On page 36, 'rabic 4.2 Trip Generation by 1AWd Use, the Specific Plant will generate additional 332/1,084 AMIPM peak hour trips and 9,651 averagedally trips. Tiicre arc a total of 18 protects in the Specific Plan vicinity whicli would generate a tow of2,670/5,,542 AM/PM peak hour trips, Many of the trips will utilize the State 111cilities. Potential cumulative tratflc bripact may occur on the State facilities if no mitigation is proposed. On page 46 of the TS, "flee maximum number for one-way Project trips that W011d be added to these frmway segment monitoring locations would be in the PM peak hour with 55 trips oil i-10 east of Pack Road, 50 trips on 1.10 at Grand:, Avenue, 30 trips on 1-210 west of 1-605, and xero 1,rips, ori 1-10 cast of Puente Avenue and on 1-6,05 at San Gabriel River Bridge." Tice assigni-owlt of trips to the freeway need its bejustifled, by validated source. The -assignment of trips fo,ohloff ramps needs to be disclosed. Caltrans would like, to qwuitify the development's .impact of state facilities, SP"iACM1Y 010 on/Oif-ranips between Pacific Avenue and Baldwin Park Boulevard (inclusive) in ternis, oftrip gerieration wid queuing since those ranips are of close proxin'tity to the proposed dayclopment, "Caltrans'lmjprove.? mONNY f -cross CalifOrI110 " Ms. Amy Harbin June 12, 2015 Page 2 of 3 Caltrans is concerned that the freeway ramps will back up, creating a potentially unsafe conditiom To ensure the ramps do not back up, which would potentially 6reate a,safety issue, the intersections adjacent to the ramps must be able to absorb the off -ramp vo urates at the same time as they serve local circulation and land uses. Queuing analysis capacity of the off-raattp should be calculated by the actual length of tlp off - ramp between the temalnuses to the gore point with 30 feet per car. The queue length should ire calculated front the traffic counts, actual si aal timing and the percent of truck aassignmeptsto the ramp with a passenger car equivalent factor of 3,0 (worst case scenario). Tire analyzed result may need to be calibrated with actual signal tinning when necessary. Please include mitigation measures if forecasW vehicle queues are expected to exceed 85% of the totem available range capacity such that the storage will allow a 15% safety factor. It is also recontattende the City determine whether project -related plus cumulative traffic is expected to cause long, queues on the on and off -ramps. Caltrans is concerned that the project impact may result in unsafe conditions date to adchtional trai"fic congestion, unsafe quouing, and difficult maneuvering, These cortcerns ne t to adequately addressed in the f° IR, In summary, without the necessary traffic aaatalysis,. C 'traa is cannot recognize the TS and D .IR as adequately identifying and mitigating the project's impacts to the State highway facilities. As a reminder, Caltrans encourages the City to work with neighboring developing cities such -gas City of Whittier to resolve any cumulative significant traffic impacts on the State facilities. The plan to work with the neighboring cities should be discussed in the Circulation Elerneatt .of the General .Plan or a new Rosolution/Policy should be passed such as follows: • The City will work with neighboring cities to address cumulative significant tray impn ' on freeway 1-10, 1-2 1 OV and 1-5054 reared ontoff, ramps as a result of l gild out of the General Plan and Specific Plan. • The City will work with Caltrans to identify potential .cumulative traffic inapaiot ,. mitigation measures. • The City will form a fair share fee program working with neighboring cities to improve,the, State facilities. • The City traffic impact fees will include any State facility irnp w verttetat as part,Of"the cumulative traffic impact. Procaaiing liands toward freeway segments, freeway interchanges, freeway ontoff ramps, as well as for bins and rail transit facilities will Wirt, the goals of the City. Project coordinator, Mr. Alan lain, left ,you 3 voice messages between 6t8t15 and 611 /15,*0 would litre to formally invite the leadagency, City of Baldwin bark, to discuss traffic impacts,, and traffic mitigation alternatives which may include fair Share contributions towanis planne4 or, fixture freeway linprovementas within the City. Please contact this office at your earliest convenience to schedule a meeting in the near future. "C..aHrmy fny;rows nobility across Cal4rorn0 " Us, Amy Harbin June 4-2j -20 1-5 Pap 3 of 3 if se feel free to contact Men Lin the pr(�Ject coordinator youbive any ques0ons, pleit. : W-9191 and refer to IGRICEQA No. 15 5.13 Sincerely, DIANNA WATSON JOR/CE,QA Branch Chief cc. Scott Morgan, State Clearinghouse "Galavea 2. Response to Comments State Clearinghouse and Planning Unit SC -1 The comment states that the Draft EIR was submitted to a list of state agencies, including the California Department of Transportation, whose comment letter is attached. The California Department of Transportation comment letter has been responded to in Letter Caltrans, above. The comment does not address raise any concerns significant environmental issues about the adequacy of the Draft EIR, but does state that the letter acknowledges that the City has complied with the State Clearinghouse review requirements for draft environmental documents. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 2-30 August 2015 Final EIR ARROYO RESOURCES Preseryttion Plgininy and _oResource June 22, 2015 Ms. Amy L. Harbin City Planner, City of Baldwin Park 14403 East Pacific Avenue Baldwin Park, California 91706 Dear Ms. Harbin I would like to submit this letter as part of the 45 -day, Draft EIR review period for the Baldwin Park Downtown Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Specific Plan Project. The following comments pertain to the Cultural Resources chapter of the EIR, specifically the sections on Historic Resources. 1) 1 do not believe that the Baldwin Park City Hall is on the California Register of Historical Resources. I don't think that there are any properties in Baldwin Park that are currently on any formal register program at the National, State, or Local levels. I do not believe that that City has undertaken any type of historic resource survey for parts of the City. It is not clear in the EIR, the source for this information. It is not clear if a property listing from the State was pulled showing previously surveyed or considered properties in the City, particularly Section 106 reviews. 2) The EIR seems to imply that some of the City's most noteworthy historic properties are not eligible as historic resources or listing on any register program. The EIR provides no technical appendix or historic resource assessment to back up those claims. I believe that the Pacific Electric Station, the National Bank, Knoll's Pharmacy, and the Chamber of Commerce building are some Downtown, properties that are potentially eligible for listing on a local, State, or National register, pending completion of a historic context statement to evaluate significance and eligibility. Because the Specific Plan is intended to provide for intensified development and because Downtown Baldwin Park has a history that goes back over 100 years and includes the original townsite, the concern is the threat to historic resources, particularly those properties that have yet to be identified. A survey program will help to identify which properties in the City have significance. Surveys can begin with little effort and build over time. A historic context statement for the City can also be brief at first, but expand overtime. The City has a local historic register program, but no initiative has been taken to identify and/or list properties formally or informally. If you need further clarification regarding these comments, feel free to call or email me. Thanks for the opportunity to comment on the Draft EIR. Sincerely, pa&& x Amp Juliet M. Arroyo amjuliet@gmail.com K 3 to Comments Juliet M. Arroyo JMA-1 The comment states they do not believe that the Baldwin Park City Hall is on the California Register of Historical Resources nor any properties in Baldwin Park that are currently on any formal register program at the national, state, or local levels. The commenter further states it is not clear in the Draft EIR, the source for this information. It is not clear if a property listing from the state was pulled showing previously surveyed or considered properties in the City, particularly Section 106 reviews. To evaluate the project's potential effects on significant cultural resources, including prehistoric and historic archaeological sites, a project -specific cultural resources literature and records search was conducted by the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) at California State University, Fullerton, which reviewed the State of California Office of Historic Preservation records, base maps, historic maps, and literature for Los Angeles County on file. The records search included an examination of previous cultural resources survey coverage, studies, and known cultural resources within a 0.5 -mile radius of the project area. Historic maps and aerial photographs were also examined. The search included a review of the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR), the California Points of Historical Interest list (CPHI), the California Historical Landmarks (CHL) list, the Archaeological Determination of Eligibility list (ADOE), and the California State Historic Resources Inventory list. The results of the records search indicated that nine previous cultural resources studies have been conducted within 0.5 -mile of the Specific Plan area, including seven studies that included portions of the Specific Plan area. Two cultural resources within the Specific Plan area were identified by the previous cultural resources studies. These resources include the Baldwin Park City Hall (p-19-167222), which has been substantially altered but is on the California Register of Historic Resources and is determined eligible for listing on the National Register; and the Central School Auditorium, which was determined to be eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. The records search conducted by the SCCIC identified no archaeological sites within the project site or within a 0.5 -mile radius of the project site (SCCIC, 20014). Additional sources for the historic information described in the Draft EIR is provided within or after Section 3.3, Cultural Resources. JNA -2 The comment states that the EIR asserts that some of the City's most noteworthy properties are not eligible as historic resources or listing on any register program. The commenter further states EIR provides no technical appendix or historic resource assessment to back up those claims, and that they believe the Pacific Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 2-32 August 2015 Final EIR to Comments Electric Station, the National Bank, Knoll's Pharmacy, and the Chamber of Commerce building are some Downtown properties that are potentially eligible for listing on a local, state, or national register, but provides no factual information to substantiate this assertion. As described in Section 3.3, Cultural Resources of the Draft EIR, there are properties located within the Specific Plan area that are of historic -age. Record searches and evaluation of properties within the Specific Plan area have been completed as described in Response JMA-1 to identify existing historic resources within the Specific Plan area. The Pacific Electric Station is described as the former Red Car Charging Station on page 3.3-8 of the Draft EIR. As described, this structure is ineligible for listing on federal, state, or local registers, primarily due to its impaired physical integrity. All of the former rails and maintenance facilities are gone. In addition, although some electrical hardware remains in the building, the building is in poor condition — with missing mortar, deteriorated brick and missing windows and doors. Because of its highly altered setting, and the building's condition, it is not eligible to list as a historic resource at the federal or state level. In addition, the building has not been designated as a local resource under the City's ordinance. The National Bank is described on page 3.3-7 as not meeting the federal or state qualifications for listing as a historic resource based on association, or exceptional architectural uniqueness. The building is not associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of history; it is not architecturally significant, is not associated with significant historic events of persons, and is not likely to yield important information. In addition, the building has not been designated as a local resource under the City's ordinance. Knoll's Pharmacy is described on page 3.3-5, and while the Pharmacy building is over 80 years old, it is not associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of history; it is not architecturally significant, is not associated with significant historic events of persons, and is not likely to yield important information. The building is not eligible for state or federal listing; in addition, the building has not been designated as a local resource under the City's ordinance. The Chamber of Commerce building is described on 3.3-8 as being renovated since the original construction and not architecturally significant. The building is not associated with significant historic events or persons, and it does not appear eligible for the National Register or state register. In addition, the building has not been designated as a local resource under the City's ordinance. JMA-3 The comment expresses a concern related to historic resources, particularly those properties that have yet to be identified. The commenter further states a survey program will help to identify which properties in the City have significance. The .. _,,.,----- .......... . Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 2-33 August 2095 Final EIR nee to Comments commenter further states the City has a local historic register program, but no initiative has been taken to identify and/or list properties formally or informally.. The Draft EIR acknowledges (page 3.3-4) that there are numerous residential and commercial buildings within the Specific Plan area that are older than 50 years, or would become older than 50 years during the 20 -year implementation of the Specific Plan. To avoid potential impacts, the proposed Specific Plan includes a policy to avoid impacts to historic buildings, which states that demolition of any building in the Specific Plan area that is 50 years old or older, unless it is demonstrated that it not a significant historic resource, shall be prohibited. As such, resources would be evaluated for historical significance as individual projects are brought forth during the 20 year project build out. In addition, any alteration of these buildings shall be done so in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring, and Reconstructing Historic Buildings or Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 2-34 August 2095 Final EIR CHAPTER 3 Revisions to the Draft EIR This section contains revisions to the Draft EIR based upon: (1) clarifications required to prepare a response to a specific comment; and/or (2) typographical errors. The provision of these additional mitigation measures does not alter any impact significance conclusions as disclosed in the Draft EIR. Changes made to the Draft EIR are identified here in stfikeout te)i to indicate deletions and in ujwld dined text to signify additions. 3..1 Draft Revisions in Response to Written Comments The following text has been revised in response to comments received on the Draft EIR. Page viii of the Draft EIR, Acronyms, is hereby modified as follows: SCAB South Coast Air Basin SCAG Southern California Association of Governments SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District SCCIC South Central Coastal Information Center SCCIC South Central Coastal Information Center SCRRA South,erri California R ioi�al Rail Ar thorit SCS sustainable communities strategies Page 3.12-8 (first Wastewater Treatment paragraph), Section 3.2, Utilities and Service Systems, is hereby modified as follows: Wastewater generated within the Specific Plan area is conveyed by LACSD No. 15 trunk sewer network (SJCWRP, 2O15a) to the San Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant (WRP) (SJCWRP) located in unincorporated Los Angeles County, near the City of Whittier. The SJCWRP provides primary, secondary and tertiary treatment) and has current flow of 71.3 � million gallons per day (mgd) and a design capacity of 100 mgd, serving a population of over one million people (LACSD, 2015). Water treated at a primary level consists of removing solids from the wastewater. Secondary treatment involves aerating the wastewater to supply oxygen to microorganisms that feed on organic materials in the wastewater. Tertiary treatment involves the removal of any remaining suspended materials in the water and disinfection. ---- Bal.._._ ...., .�......_ d. ...... Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3-1 August 2015 Final EIR 3, Revisions to the Draft EIR Page 3.12-17 of the Draft EIR, Section 3.12, Utilities and Service Systems, is hereby modified as follows: Wastewater Infrastructure The proposed Specific Plan would intensify land uses within the Specific Plan area and would result an increased generation of wastewater flows. As shown below in Table 3.12-8, build out of the proposed Specific Plan would result in wastewater generation of approximately 310,549 370,623 gallons per day, which is an increase of 7&) tim21 �1 gallons per day over existing conditions. TABLE 3.12-8 ESTIMATED INCREASE IN WASTEWATER GENERATION Estimated Wastewater Units Generation (gpd) Net Wastewater Land Use ExistingProposed Increase Use Factorz Existing Proposed Residential 101 DUs 934 DUs 833 DUs 156 —2W 15.756 145,704 vefao�.298 21,098 494,272 Non -Residential 886,538 sf 1,175,676 sf 289,138 sf 0,14' Y"Q - 124.115 J64 DAa Q:20 980-7 F�-tge:- 045 Total: 139.871 310,549 637988-7 370,623.4 Total Increase: 170.678 Pro osed — Existing) 2416,634.7 ' Existing residential and non-residential development estimated from the acreages provided in Table 2-1 in Chapter 2, Project Description. 2 Sotursa: Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County http://www.lacsd.org/civica/filebank/blobdload.asp?BlobID=3531 �- a8rsr;vary-dep4l ndkl"ra-Hype, gseaW-aMOMM- f waawsafte ttaerturlfi fuaralVY.aescdentl�+aa�ea arr�o�°we..tyf��of iaxtMra�l r1 v a�&Urfa`vaeart-gr�ar�rra�kgfreatr�rarnonarats•rf d au��rr�ater than-otlterrk.1heaaverage-within the-rangto-w as ca6ed for both', DU=dwelling units sf = square feet As described, the SJCWRP has a current inflow of 71.3 7-3-4 million gallons per day, with a design capacity of 100 million gallons per day (LACSD, 2015a). Therefore, SJCWRP has an excess treatment capacity of approximately 28.7 29.6 million gallons per day and would have sufficient capacity to process the additional average wastewater flow of '1.70,678 24-4.434 gallons per day that would be generated by the Specific Plan at build out. Therefore, implementation of the Specific Plan would not result in impacts to the SJCWRP. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 3-2 August 2015 Final EIR 3. Revisions to the Draft EIR Page 3.12-23 (Wastewater) of the Draft EIR, Section 3.12, Utilities and Service Systems, is hereby modified as follows: Build out of the proposed Specific Plan along with the related projects would add demand for wastewater services within the service area of the LACSD. SJCVWRP has an excess treatment capacity of approximately 28.7 2-9-.6 million gallons per day, and would have sufficient capacity to process the additional average wastewater flow of 17(1,678 14 634 gallons per day that would be generated by build out of the Specific Plan. The excess treatment capacity is substantial, such that the projected demand generated by the Specific Plan development combined with the related projects would not exceed the existing capacity of the SJCWRP, as concluded by project related correspondence with LACSD. Baldwin Park TQD Specific Plan Project 3-3 August 2095 Final EIR CHAPTER 4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Pursuant to Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code and the CEQA Guidelines Section 15097, a lead agency is required to adopt a monitoring and reporting program for assessing and ensuring compliance with the required mitigation measures applied to a proposed project for which an EIR has been prepared. As stated in the Public Resources Code (Section 21081.6(a)): "... the public agency shall adopt a reporting or monitoring program for the changes made to the project or conditions ofproject approval, adopted in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment. " Section 21081.6 provides general guidelines for implementing mitigation monitoring programs and indicates that specific reporting and/or monitoring requirements, to be enforced during project implementation, shall be defined prior to final certification of the EIR. The lead agency may delegate reporting or monitoring responsibilities to another public agency or a private entity, which accept such delegation. The lead agency, however, remains responsible for ensuring that implementation of the mitigation measures occur in accordance with the program. The mitigation monitoring and reporting program table below lists the mitigation measures that are required to reduce the significant effects of the proposed project. To ensure that the mitigation measures are properly implemented, the mitigation monitoring and reporting program provides the following information: • Mitigation Measure(s): The action(s) that will be taken to reduce the severity of the impact. • Implementation, Monitoring, and Reporting Action: The appropriate steps that will be taken to implement and document compliance with the mitigation measures. • Responsibility: The agency or private entity responsible for ensuring implementation of the mitigation measure. Regardless of the entity identified as having responsibility for implementing a mitigation measure, until the mitigation measures are completed, the City of Baldwin Park, as the CEQA Lead Agency, remains responsible for ensuring that implementation of the mitigation measures occur in accordance with the mitigation monitoring and reporting program (CEQA Guidelines, Section 15097(a)). • Timing: The general schedule or point at which the measure must be conducted for each monitoring task. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project "� August 2015 Final EIR MMRP G W 0Z Og Wa a.L) ZLL pU WW Wo (L LU 0 Ix O H z z az 00 Z_Z 03: 00 HO �n 0 O a) a1 mw O p m mw _ O p m mL O m m faw V . s CI E cu O C m C 0-:t- CU O C L C a.- m C cu O L C a. m C ca O C a. -1E m `"� E �'3d ca m 3a m 3a O N U O N U E O N 0 •m O N U O •m a) o O a m o O a) o U O D m a ancn a n`o,U n 0- can- n CLaN C C C C O O. a Nm _Q N m C j C a) 0 m ❑ a) o N ❑ N N 0 ❑ N o ❑ N - C C C C 7 E c 7 m E c 7 m E c 7 E c Hc E E :2 Em E O Um Um U ov9 Um CL U m U m U m U m a C: N m C c m p m m w mw N m m m m= . .D 7 _ a)w L ,� mw p L C N L E m f- '� w C -2— p N .> 4=- O C O O m m C o m O 21. •C C• 6 C N O m U 76 u) mcm S N "' 7 m "' 7 m N 2c N m N ac) `O N> C O- U C.N., m N m C c 0 O U a) V O' Q c N m m N a) O U E m O N m N a> o U m V o C o C O N cn O -C U m a) .`a) C O N" N 7 m U N C O N N N m C O N- N moo` ial= E �aoc�`am 3 do N wm� a)nwmm 7 C w U :L; Q '-' N 7 C U m N •� C 7 C Q U C 7 C U C C cNa� y�coi oW m4 m c �E N•co cpi�o �E N N�V aa)iE N2 c O N` N C 7 N m U .-. C y c m L_ L` c m !� ` O O C O 'O C.L.• m a) 0 m O m O C 0 m O a>i m O C w N O C o rn� n$ E c m rnD o m E N o L oYa = a cpi oY� o- a3i O ;;�+ O m C •> U O C O ptp: E �' D y C •> U m E eco ° ca .0 '> U E D C> E� �� MQ c m dc�m' mm magi cvmE-2 0 a o cc m>magi m�•mm E >>o a ��c m>;mm m E 3 o a m>mm >> p N Er a -0o o o 0 -CD m ` L) Q Ca Leo 'm m Q o � o U a y p n"� f c ca c cU U a m o c m cU U U �� S m U 5 CU U m .9 C) aCL O T ~ ar as c a,. o m 0 O O :5 ,§ m O` co C m 8. 8:1o m c q.} m �. 8 m o N a a to ca. w C c o 7 cu U Laairm3 a>NU .c maz ,.... G'y3 N m -cl Ec0co'E r L_SLE<°-0 cn N E N m ca c0 ? 3 U O N` C dW�yJ C` 'r " N 2 7' C m S m C a 7 a E 0 N w '5 wl U O O O i,].. 7 "' yY m U N a N Y _Y 'm. m` N E/8 T m C LC U L E U o mcv � m - c6� m S�Nib m Dar as � ram m m Cir 7 O x'Yl7 � cc U'c C" �2 > �, N O .0 a o c- • E !E5 a mcO1mm00a� o> cacuv c• u.rn ooU 2 arp�q�pp— p 8L— aE cm a� co m c E coi c oC) m m ro as � o o'%'2 m� 0) .0 m o N '- N d a�7 O. U N CO U L 0J ar' a N c > 4 a� ik L `I C L C a�� o 'm O m m E .L.." •� N w C '� C m ic�yy! w '0 "C N "' m m C. > m qy a,7a t,�7- N o �y m T O C. 0) O N w C N ,N O ?ls 0� V O' N C Q> O' p Q a m a m. a 7 0 as ¢U a) t1� t7A .. C p O O C -> U -2 C O C m 0 3. O 0 f9 m '0 �_ C y W ci N mHca�EDm ° Ckr:, E Cd3 ' L 0�0> 3 hV ab' U U O C ❑❑ a q-m2015oc�m N O 4= C W onm%2u` N N m U m= 5 C d 0 :c:�' " y -p L CL gf, o. - O m� N d •C L Q E 7 Epz..c -0 m c oma ?moo o o'D U O Nm N N W N a C aP N Oati O �w� 7 ua c�c c :'gip a) Um N w-. M1..� — c•c N ss 7 9 - _ C N - m m N N O C '� Q N C7 aJ C C m 3 - O)'c ti Y 0 C L; L m C A C m Q) N N> N c> —> o m m m m 0 W c p C.5 m - O r1 L w U fa "' W 0 o' c i d N LaA c m` m c U m� nL p�L L N 3 C m y 7 a) `"- x 'j m C E a N Z m 6-0-o ca q'y L 'a" N m co 0 LTk qa rn m j m C X ., N C m L m .>' O C_ '7 CoC m 3 c6 m U O .7 :� m "0 @3 E m i > Uf U N q7 ` N O 1Y5 p U T m V7 S� N - `7 aL a) m E a) m c m m E N y m 0> 3 m m, qa ca r- C 5 E- O L »- C.0 ai m— AU L) L �o w m E N U� o U m _ 06 m . ~ .,. O a N %„ O C T w, -E ~ N a> 7 pm'rn mff N 7 m Baa c oo m ` mo E��ac ,. m .2:7: m""U,Nc``n ti Q' C�NC,:`mco E '� L m o " ca E N Asp N o o:: -20 LUI L 7 m C Q? =� u' mY L 'L..C- m N n O Y m U V7 N N N O~ ..m. (a N L_ 7 U '4.Y q� '-a, 7 ,C cla U y �Pf 795 . m ,; =01 N N 'O m N ci .5 N m m m a c m >j 'O m m >•. 4a L �LVyy "a. m as d.�. C N N rL C C .4-0 O L N d '7 C Ca f"m'A,„ 4'P5 r ' C Ci m CDb, E N O m 4' C U7 mL m m' 0 O . N m m C m U U N m q -mi m o I'D, m LaNaim C �% O } m co =_ N C 07 C 7� 2 U fl •a '� ® m 0aoE> au nop ,p 3mEEovEo oaYc Y mw mE• �z O� ' 7 m�w?Em>emom m �, O) U m O C E c m U mr +—_ O"? 4? "" C E Saara)Z Ca p m ID .. •'O' C N N °H as S,k S�' O O 01 U O C a) C 7 'm e LLI w a7 Q 1. N Q L L C U O 7 a m U O m m Z V Cn 01 O m U m n 7 p a O ,^L'..: 2 42 Cil G'Y� m N t9 a N CS. .O. > w w C.L.+ N � t'n m m a N O E N -0 � Cn r-.�. ro co ix. �Z 0n Wa a 0U Z V X11J O C' a. N w0 F - Q 00 Zz 00 Z Y O� oa Z C9 � � J g oQ0 0 o a, Ta pow � :5 p p C O O C a] C C CL w m n ,L.- ca E CU m � a H O U .2 U O a) p Q CL d 'a. U) a` n Cl) c W a) W Q- o - O O N N NN > C > c (D O 4).0 Q N N C Q Q 7 TA 7 01 Z E C E C w Ea E� CL Um Um �C �c Um Uas 0 O a � NL o o n E V N O N 0 O +1 C CO: N C T•N O 2-..2 y Cc: cu N N a N c _0 . y C C N C N m N N C N (p N O ° E U O O N a) O O v m o c•o E m N c o E m N N of>E� NCS c aiaci oc� m o c :Ec �E NSU a)cu CL rt o E Q Eo o `N Eo O`a� N -2Ec g� ocw baa) ori C `o N ma a 0 3 _rna d c0) 3 O r m ` O>c -Fu O a) w c j V �p C N E a'�� m rQ c •cmc m> a)aai�m �> aDaaio�v ww a o as �'o a o as n E 'o N ani c c cU 0 5 m 5 �U D 0 c a E ) C L A N N ve N N N a C �' SOA 0Y 'c 0 � 'D E 7 U T C 7 o to a� Iy6 o o c Tb r s a N 7 7 N 'F d 0 -, N 4 (U a.1 gay E „��,y dl7f7. � >_ O <? °S. c� ar id,r E L) c. o .. - ,>" O,. ��- Arca" Fu D �cc�wN> �c z rsvaas E cr _ �aE Q- o m f° ar o a) o N N o ra E aga N c ra as uunyry ss a Taa c •m (D N U a) Y 3 F) O C C ,tb C"d 1. a7 00,. C],. G17 "O 0 0 � A" 7 4'b 4S 'C3 N "� N O Tv aci w N� � C,`� � aE c a�0 — . ��cu O at ZI tia kCW' �a-°Y �s,c0�>.aO-2O cu 0C 03 0 taa a' E EE'0 15 6) Nx M 0 — 0 �� �u s �Oj�a� Le 'r'o E y m "uTrewOyu -co 14 :NLa ooc0cwcoas m. °a6aw -P cu'E 'c'c c C� a�oONd OC N a ED J 0 C , s °U� E�ustLa:� as `ra°3 m, d � 1d E"ex- no TAV@n=ELM•'U u5 a) 0 2a) o `r a'Cc >, �< L sN C 0 Ma �.c 2 O] a a"7 > uS wCTaa q.N Nw -'CN ;wi mN Er.: O yNcm T www.c CN OaUOC 'OC m a r- as {., "i 0 Mn b .VC4CL.?iY,C7 CC; N O O 0 C " ONm 2j. 45 a D c ai M riis O > c CU w O 0 O m ; (V W ry'U 3 A1— aE Na Y o N O()U o C:) M 'C") ) 5D > 104 a 2 CA C • C ,. ab e'aL tN o d'tPrV7 �Y�.,�•, c� C�S} �Ytl. a� L " O <kN6 8N ,E"dtD Ciy C N?C Na/l O' _ a M �a C>mNNOG M, a) fa "aE COCC aN CU : a�n aEQ m a"O SN4imL6LO (n 5�Er cOUo ` .c a N O CN teu O 41 O FpC3. • O c r)5 -S 2 ELO 32 CC C 45 o c to a�"jOate'� a)' N OCal ry?"Cc: 0 �Ta 2 c '-C s140":C p O Y!K�CaCw �7 Ntw,0 C .0 gc > as aam u o(u s as a + as 11J Z 0� as av 0 — Z U ul Oa a. w 0 Q ?j 00 Z Z 00 H0 z C0 C za OZ 00 H J � m O N No w U O a) m > m > O U > C m C C C O d O C rn a� m a m ac/) n� m E CL (aaE�aacd M- F- H o N U O -0-.4 ) p N U U C m U _ U O N > ca n. a` a a'3 d a` a cn c c c 0 0 0 > C > c > c C 0 m 0 G).0 p N O n ON C� Em EE m E Ea ED E2 O Um Um Um CL N O - -0 U m U m U m N N a) O N o .0O O n O C a) N C O Q) C �O w N p N CO O N C j O_ j C .-+ =3m C C N N U C N m N a) v c ' m a) 0=Sa) moo .E° . E oo m N a) O_ :E O N y- w O Oa U U 7 C y N O C C N N O C C c�E 2m amiE u) L) amiE Noo a) C V d C U w E O 7 C E 0 0 2 N E O _O 2 N C C N N O C a) N o C N .N O p O> U O>> In w O>> N Y C m d OU 3 p) O. U O) 3 C _ _ O O O U — O a) C> U �0 a) C> U �v E o.2 EY me E w �c Ay6 Q a) m (u y a) > a)a) > cD a) c M _0 o -o c a 0 '0(Ou '0 o -o 'o ° 'Q y c 2 2 0 m 0 0 o c> E n 7 0 E CL E C C C 0.0 0 0 0 m 0.000 _ o aC N 42 a) O tA m(n iac�EES: E w T — O m N w iK7 =, G1y CM11 (a OAA �m 0 o U ,N� O C N a) C U U O a�a. -.., j C m "A'. w C .K...O tA) m au a) C �A o 0 0) c N (sn a .'., 'C a.) V7' •� p 'O, 'p a 5 0Y :w U CN 0' 00 •C?', p a) O a,G •O •p a) a) a) a`) "O' :C . 'C U a) •c y � t1a Ate. c... Q a E N U m m o p' u o U O CY7 .U- O O N RIM p, C1.. '7 N a.5 , m'C > O O4,), O a) N a.G Cal +'rJ,w C 77 :sc' c m 0 E m ca CCL .0 ' `) COL, �P"Y N a.G C5' Ck UC NG t C CAO.O oCa) w arC CL O r mciAAaa�m3 o cua ONS 'o J as E°' o E 3 0 E a)�a n wriiZM Oc" o 0� c ° 0 o 5 o ca In m %a to Awry a) o >M > to .0 O7 U > a d _ C a 'r -0 A"7' > > A : N NoQ 0 as>• a) ° n)s 100=2 p� J-0 >, to m °O ' ;y .L-- a) >,:B ak E lG3 C O (0�_ 0 t to to ear c• c_0 r E2 o a n ��ci.GpOc°a v'"°ate o 0 Q0 Ih � '0 54- a) � as o -C C) 1 -pE o -m cL a) umN 'j vC a,aCy'' mc7 cmCm 2jcyy p,aSA-Ak1 o C OM -0 ,J 0 a 0 ca 0.0aN AO U. N OcOa)O ' j j Cm C O' 0- 0 O 0 S C0N '5-0 a S CNC0 D O O .a3.) IP O U = d' ) 0 (D 0 a) C Aa 3 C p) m ".�•. •ICY � �. ` p) a.7 �' m O m C1O ui a) a ) y 'O aFQR°-i• V4.wMl O O C c C C =U N CO m N N 2 O O O m O O a) N aoE 0 ZZ Z J Z Z Mcc'5ca.2:E 0ch N 0 ca m O N U O 0 m O a) m O a) (6 O a) m U -Fu :5 N 5:5 N 75.5 2 -6:5 >C a) U > c m > c (6 > c m > C p C '0 Q) p c p O C O Ca. nvnl nw m nw C m o 0 m aw E mo a)m ca mid m m� p 4 2 m U U O pU0 w= p N U 0O OU E L_ (c6 O a) O D a) O •O Q Z O d C n a m n'� d a n cn a a cn d a cn d n. C C 0 0 0 0 m 0 N > c N c c c > > mo (L) .0 (L) .2 a)o N O N 0 •N p m U N 41 E E 0) m0) 7 0s 7 0) E.9 E c E c E c c cE:9a U EEE22 Ev mos p=) 0 5 0 5 0 9 a. �o Um Um Um Um c c C) � C:W U m U m U m U m U m a) a) a) ai w m w w �Q " o .0 U o ) :5 N -O to O m D a) m O a) O m d O N C C o j N .cp.� a) C j w 0 C m n O N C 7 d O '0 m 10 m m C m m C C -0 trail m C N C a) c N m m a) C w m N O N C w (6 N O N C ,N, o oU o� a)�io 0y a)V,0 c c0 L)) 000 o �OiaUi 0 m U m o o a) E m N c .o E m N - c 'o E o N '- c 'o v a awom a) 0ca on o .oma U U 7 C U U m C C N 0 N C N a) O C O Cl) a) O c CO 0 N a) 0 c0 o d � 0 .O �a a) �Q CpU W u)c)(n �a u) .2 m 0Q Ep Em Eo o y Eo .2`N o Ep o_2N o Eo C C a) c U a) C N N O C 0 .N O C a) N O C a) O O> 0�= 0 O> >in� O> > N N O> > N� N O> 0 U C 0 p C a) O C -2 0 O C 'O a) C (6 fa a) '0) i6 O Co L O O m-0 O 0 m V LM C O � O •� N N O a) C 0 0 0 0 C 0 O) O 0 C S U E-ffi E ora Em w-0 2 c E m wa c Em «� d o c E m Q o > a) a) > a) m a) > a) a) m a) > m m C) ._ m a) > C d1 L 0 '0 'D O -o '0 0 .d p 0 .Q � o L-0 Q O 0 C 7 m «. V 7 m 7 m 7 m C 7 m m C 7 E U a" o.�m c a c ou C) c n c c o (° c a c coo (6 o a 0 0 m C U N — m . U U m U U m U U m aCL o 0) m c -0 c �m w(c6 o«>ami oE'c wo a) U c p c om0 r �cic c. c6 U U C d C Lo N 11 .0 0" p Cm7)'O c "? C g p6 O). o U a)a �� 0 E m c ��� a) 3 N (s a) > Ua)•� o��a 0E �w E (ca N m V 3 L UO N .2 C, 0 C L n a) Y m N �"' CA 'O C E 0 m. a m- d fl L am" ` N c N C a) m U r .L.+ L O L U ()) C, a) . c ay C:. C O C N L m c 0 a) m f6 O a) m U E a) U c N C C_ O m 0> D L 0, wO U bN. acLi m c') m m ai N C O U L L 7 .L-. m 'V o C L 0 3 L m N od p .0 01 ...w ,g U `�.h i!Y� 1 .E, N- L � Q O N C O,n 0 :F; m 7 0 C C N> w w-+ co'O O "r'' „C.. q S) i'Si C O m ai V m a) m xQ�3��a oa)2Ea-6 °) ca'"0cta .00 a0„r •oco a0)n € C � c � o c0i.j > L) (D o a) � o o ° E az 0t: (u a a c 0. M aa)i o 0 f6 % a a'O _ m C O fAry O �m O m a1 tk. o w a 0 Cm m N •� m.LO. N _� C E n_ ;° m ton 0) C 0 ".> N (li o o C a) m m C °)oNa)yE�" C) 0 cj >a 0ua'c ( E ID o)cl— E•o Y a) iii m aoammoM m�nyoo�rn v aror 5; -0.2 0) 0 0` O O N C '00 •0 > .L. o 7 N a) 'd 07' 0 E cry �^ (4w m C .�" C w u! �+�, � C� C 7 N 0 >� 0 c a) m m d nm o a) ca o o ��.•aa) c a m a) o o g m ri °3 ui aci o ���'mn�cm m`m�x>v�Lm mmv°E>pt iao03 a�im� mU 0 0 U 0 Q« N •T• C O' 0 0 O O N C" N L f• 1 i7N� Vb I= SO�s ('48 0 a� N tNas O 'C� N" a7 m N Co`oma)N_d Um CU arsm0Na) E(s'Em" arc as ZCa) _TN > > mTm.0 0 a)„- E' ami E S m + o .o m0- 0 E E m () E m o�n��oN— .L).00( rm2 L)iit r�a c (Fl,cn yctk i� ? c DoE U ) QoYNcc�N a�LNXc�E W.()(cavomc.sro°w 'Ea -QE Hi6 a) N L j O L n N m 0 U a) 0 ry E U c da O aY C p c d 0 co w `t .0 •�a-_-) o) (miami C m m o E c '(�' O y "z ail .2 a> o i3 L)) a7 T) k a o N `O O m m« o E 3 O w C i m aci Mn O ap m N cxa ' o w m.> m U (av 0y Co 0 rn Z3o�%cn�_ Zcn���aa))� a)m (Y6o+ 0 �v �c� cs�moo m� C n' m L U N m w m N> d� ( N a) �a1 Cl' O C L+7 C m >` M,^^ - Ra C E O 0 m (6 C C w O 0 (a a). m m m 0 0 a) m m (m6 (yaE�w>o n€ mu3i a)� E� 0'- C)Nnc °mow k -oow mC' 0 D na) 0 3 o a m a) 0� a)m as m L as O o w CL F3 E as c._ m cr 0 L m d (° nC o C o> c cis > a) m a) w m as c c T o c c)0 m C C o co O •- a) U> O C - O L E T a; ..O 7 O) C" (;r., C- C .•*� 5 •- a) C O O a) 0 m E L :. O m Y > .-• Co 0 R. 4).. c C i O N O 0. «6 4'6 >, C N O ¢a CL m C m O a d r r� Y U N 0.0)3 ` .2 C C C a) m E .ra (x mm m ca q� p."(a) r+e ) F m. O O m 6 .. C( P� m t.,. C 'C' C. C s..� O - O m !�• rn rn 3 c L) o a) � c n rn v o 'y o Y Cxr (S ) as ca rau E E rs)'ia y � a) m U r+ r C w a 0 N = a) CO i•i N 0 > ` a '"'" C. ; "C3 a�,N is O m� a) r rt,7' p O "' C,%, „�, C � (D =' n m 3 Nw� ow U ��� a). ca 'n _r 2 a nU 1c: E, � aU n � � m � �U � W OZ On W n. a OU ZU W W O a. co a. 0' 0 H Z Z Q 00 ZZ 00 HO ZY 0� Oa Z 0 H J �m Cd 2 ca C to w Z N C 0 CL N w O c O � c c O o Y E _ o aC Ew d 7 N d c 0 m rn m N C a) E r Co C o_ o a) rn0 C: 0) 'C C C N c6 N n c �,'m UW r C 0 m 'c C a7 a U y U y •� •ca C 0_ 4tl5'. E a) m 7 +L' (U Q) O) U C za O UQ) N N N O °-L N L •j E LaN6N nE2 Q N N L aTc2O?m7nLD(LN) _"' ` X N .0 CU C: (L) .�N O> O T 7 C_ (6 a) U O N N L L N — L a) b' N 3 L Q) C d73 a7 -0 U a) 5 O O_ L a) 7 N � °T (6 'W'�) E a) C E J N y u) O 0 U a) N N O = O_0 a)—L 7 '> rya3 N "O O„ w E - a) U ALy L C '> ?°W C O L f6 C. U N k6. O t= del a) °) N C73mN,�:yiU"u�' N >CD w w C U 7 a) O 'O CyC 2yEa)a) mE xa - CLU)a=daci n -r �! 2 oo c L w 0 o a' ci.EL '' 0 N a) 6) ', f- X a) O a) N a) y o — a) Co 8 c 0 o = O> O L 'C 7 0 O Z U N N v� 6 C Na) f6 6:S CCD: Q1 "X •p U p ° - 7 C a) oo E u 'ca 65 N i) o W o wcCCU>, >E awavi Mm a) m o c wau') v cLn 'o° °o 0EEmcL Eaa)C', ma) o Ea E a) "'" o EW.crvo= of o •° 'rF�r O co .o L 2 L) o � N pr.,is rrM =CL a6 � D7 m ca a) O C C rn .c u t ra ?� oma,). a) ) Lti, K] CO C d O)=03 tmo E: k5y .— 4 C0 0 ) co as N C -0 4Y.1 "' N O aN��ti"."�.. 6U Cl C 0 C. o co A.A. T N 2 C • OC o � C •) C Q. U 0 a) C U co N f ) a) O U i5 N N C °)c E C E co m 0o c -CD a d cow C O M2 O a) -5 ., C-0 0 00 =3 • u- � c ac) cr E C o N y4y A'GV b7) C L N (Da mo d o 1. a"L a N z'0:5 N O v m Q o o - a) N � at z m z w z (L) c°°''ate°c' > a6 6 Y4O'.• ., Q 2 ;7r = 2 � tW i:Yi ozi 7 wm O J O O O C ° M C? 7oE`�a) CO O ° 7 a7 C, NoL U OI L) 0. id 0 c f6 17 6 g� E N O W1 CD c 3c"�x6 LL 0 CS C C ti F -o oc" ` E, 1� o tcu �wIF" 8= a o 0 ED U C i O U no aa)i ° �0 aUi m3 J E2 OC j p• too O_ a) C 7 d N w -0 a) 7 [6 N C E 7 6) C C L_ N _ a) L N N a) N C N a) C m O p UE � O N O CE (6 n 0° w° CU 4= w° 7 C U U O_ N Q 0 cv n O coin u) u O C coo y N E c Ua) O > C � > N a)OC -Ln a) NN ` CI O ` Q0 0 Corn -0n0 3 0 o c - E a) a)cLa) —a>i� (D E w' CCN �oY C C m a) 6) (d .O 'O (Dc (6 -0 O -0'0 O- c a) N 7 N E co N 7 w0 7 7 a C ` 7 7 7 ccUv� �m �SUva �jNo E W y U y •� •ca C 0_ 4tl5'. E a) m 7 +L' (U Q) O) U C za O UQ) N N N O °-L N L •j E LaN6N nE2 Q N N L aTc2O?m7nLD(LN) _"' ` X N .0 CU C: (L) .�N O> O T 7 C_ (6 a) U O N N L L N — L a) b' N 3 L Q) C d73 a7 -0 U a) 5 O O_ L a) 7 N � °T (6 'W'�) E a) C E J N y u) O 0 U a) N N O = O_0 a)—L 7 '> rya3 N "O O„ w E - a) U ALy L C '> ?°W C O L f6 C. U N k6. O t= del a) °) N C73mN,�:yiU"u�' N >CD w w C U 7 a) O 'O CyC 2yEa)a) mE xa - CLU)a=daci n -r �! 2 oo c L w 0 o a' ci.EL '' 0 N a) 6) ', f- X a) O a) N a) y o — a) Co 8 c 0 o = O> O L 'C 7 0 O Z U N N v� 6 C Na) f6 6:S CCD: Q1 "X •p U p ° - 7 C a) oo E u 'ca 65 N i) o W o wcCCU>, >E awavi Mm a) m o c wau') v cLn 'o° °o 0EEmcL Eaa)C', ma) o Ea E a) "'" o EW.crvo= of o •° 'rF�r O co .o L 2 L) o � N pr.,is rrM =CL a6 � D7 m ca a) O C C rn .c u t ra ?� oma,). a) ) Lti, K] CO C d O)=03 tmo E: k5y .— 4 C0 0 ) co as N C -0 4Y.1 "' N O aN��ti"."�.. 6U Cl C 0 C. o co A.A. T N 2 C • OC o � C •) C Q. U 0 a) C U co N f ) a) O U i5 N N C °)c E C E co m 0o c -CD a d cow C O M2 O a) -5 ., C-0 0 00 =3 • u- � c ac) cr E C o N y4y A'GV b7) C L N (Da mo d o 1. a"L a N z'0:5 N O v m Q o o - a) N � at z m z w z (L) c°°''ate°c' > a6 6 Y4O'.• ., Q 2 ;7r = 2 � tW i:Yi ozi 7 wm O J O O O C ° M C? 7oE`�a) CO O ° 7 a7 C, NoL U OI L) 0. id 0 c f6 17 6 g� E N O W1 CD c 3c"�x6 LL 0 CS C C ti F -o oc" ` E, 1� o tcu �wIF" 8= a o 0 ED Z O� (La aU C7 — Z LL pU W W 00. a.W w 0 I -- Q 0 ZZ �R: 00 Hlm 0 O� Q Oa Z H J Q gm itr 0 N 7 N U O C4 � N 7 -0-5 E 6 w a� > O O N C IN N C N tf V - m -0m O O N O) C C O) C C W C ca c CL C FL a1 U W '9 o � m 3 i� Co a� w 0.6 v N '30 o -0 N m 'o c n a o c 0,6 o C O mC o o N coo_ C d N U O c m` o d N ccL N m o d C O O V o � C N c o C N lY0 Q O. L C ca N d C E 7 N N N > N p �0 w N m n a �0 O C m O L CL L N _ U U .c am N O C ,II +L+ 'O C N N m O m tO d d m N U) L N N C M 0 CD N (T6 U p ? c C CO O ccU L C m O 9 m O "D CL >'+ N N C N O m �>C U f6 is > O_ N N >O, CL O,c 'T7 N 7 m0. w O � Cy ",C"r -1m-0 m ? m c p� > O, �, O a) C p E M Ncr A > m c C O c'. '(u m Q m o m E aha stx CD c_ o"c o CD ai co �° m Z = :=. c,a ora caao N m�� uu r0CU E € m Doc m O C O) N tv d C C C Pa.. O) O O N O O" cu it O ch — M O a7 w ' u On U) 7 LL ttS m L O O ~ Co N N m C O C. F,M d' O j; C.L. � O fi F' C ow O Co 7> O C m (>U' N 7> m a y m N Iy0 C) =3 C N E_ N N N N OL .L.. . 9 N CO C x iU U 0 0 d 0 0 0 C = Ea Ta Q m 0V) mCOCOw 7 Z mfg. ATTACHMENT #5 FINDINGS OF FACT Attachment #5 Findings of Facts Ff""' ATTACHMENT #5 ............. Findings of Fact 1. Purpose of Findings The Final EIR, prepared in accordance with CEQA, evaluates the significant adverse environmental impacts that could result from the project. CEQA Guidelines Section 15091 of the requires that the public agency approving or carrying out the project shall make written findings for each significant impact identified in the ER accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale for each finding. These findings include one of the following: Changes or alterations have been required to, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as defined in the Final EIR. 2. Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency, or can and should be adopted by such other agency. Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR. These findings accomplish the following: They address the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR for the approved project. They incorporate all mitigation measures associated with these significant impacts identified in either the Draft EIR or Final EIR. They explain why a significant effect is avoided or reduced by the adopted mitigation measures to a less than significant level. The conclusions presented in these findings are based on the Initial Study, the Draft EK the Final EIR and other evidence in the record of proceedings. 2. Effect of Findings To the extent that these findings conclude that various mitigation measures outlined in the Final EIR would reduce potential impacts of the Specific Plan, the City of Baldwin Park hereby binds itself to implement these mitigation measures. The City Council will adopt a mitigation monitoring and reporting program (MNW) concurrently with these findings to ensure that the all Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project I Final EIR November 2015 Attachment #5: Findings of Facts mitigation measures are implemented. The N4NW includes applicable mitigation measures developed as part of the EIR process for the Specific Plan. 3. Project Description Description The TOD Specific Plan has been developed with the overarching intent of introducing a transit - oriented development pattern to the 115 acre Specific Plan area. The Specific Plan would guide future development of the Downtown area to create a walkable transit -oriented environment that is proximate to the Metrolink Station and that would provide improved access for all modes of transportation, including transit, walking and bicycling. The Specific Plan is intended to provide opportunities to build on the City's unique historic and cultural characteristics to enhance the Downtown core; take advantage of the location of the Metrolink Station and access to regional transit; create a strong community identity and sense of place; provide new employment, housing and shopping opportunities; and strengthen the City's tax base. Opportunities exist within walking distance of the Metrolink Station to provide for infill development and adaptive reuse of existing under-utilized structures to better serve the transit - oriented Downtown area and generate new investment. The Specific Plan is intended to guide future development of mixed uses in a walkable environment, streamline the development process, and serve as an incentive for economic development. The goals for the Downtown TOD Specific Plan include: • Create a mix of uses with residential and employment densities that support transit use. • Offer a range of housing options proximate to transit. • Leverage the location of the Metrolink Station to bring revitalizing activities to Downtown; • Create vibrant and diverse commercial corridors that provide a strong community identity and sense of place in the heart of town; • Design a pedestrian -friendly environment with well-designed buildings, attractive streetscapes, and engaging public spaces. • Create multi -modal streets that accommodate pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicles. • Increase level of goods and services available to residents of the community; • Provide new employment and housing opportunities; • Attract shoppers from outside the community; and • Strengthen the City's tax base. The objectives of the Specific Plan, which have been identified to meet the goals listed above, are to identify land use options that include increased housing densities and mixed uses, as well as Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project Final EIR November 2015 Attachment #5: Findings of Facts create pedestrian linkages between the station, community facilities and major recreation, retail, and residential nodes of activity. 4. Findings Concerning Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts The following impacts were identified in the Final EIR as significant and unavoidable. Air Quality A. Facts Implementation of the Specific Plan would result in significant air quality impacts associated with NO,, emissions. Implementation of Mitigation Measures AIR -1 and AIR - 2 would reduce the emissions of NO,,. However, because the construction intensity, phasing, length, and schedule of individual projects that would be implemented by the Specific Plan is unknown, construction impacts related to regional air pollutants would be significant and unavoidable. Pollutants for which the Basin is in non -attainment (ozone, PMIo, and PM2,5) would be generated by the project and would exceed SCAQMD's thresholds for construction. These pollutant emissions would, in conjunction with other past, current, and probable future projects, have the potential to exceed regional thresholds of significance and would be cumulatively considerable. Thus, cumulative impacts would be significant and unavoidable after implementation of Mitigation Measures AIR -1 and AIR -2. B. Findings The City finds that: 1. Construction related air quality impacts related to air emissions of NOX would be significant and unavoidable; mitigation measures provided in the EIR would reduce this impact; however, emissions could exceed thresholds. 2. Impacts related to pollutants for which the Basin is in non -attainment (ozone, PMIo, and PM2.5) would be significant and unavoidable; mitigation measures provided in the EIR would reduce this impact; however, with inclusion of past, current, and probable future projects, impacts would be significant and unavoidable. Noise and Vibration A. Facts Some of the new developments associated with the project would be constructed immediately adjacent to existing residential structures within the Specific Plan area, and would be exposed to short-term construction -related noise levels that are greater than the Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project J Final EIR November 2015 Attachment #5: Findings of Facts existing ambient noise levels; resulting in a substantial temporary increase in ambient noise levels at those existing land uses. 2. Although implementation of Mitigation Measures N0I-6 through N0I-9 provided in the EIR would reduce construction noise levels associated with the Specific Plan to the maximum extent feasible, under circumstances where future construction sites within the Specific Plan area are located immediately adjacent to existing sensitive land uses, the noise impacts related to a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels above levels existing without the Specific Plan would remain significant. Therefore, this impact would be significant and unavoidable. B. Findings The City finds that: Construction -noise impacts on existing sensitive receptors within the Specific Plan area would be significant and unavoidable. In addition, the noise impacts related to a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels would be significant and unavoidable. The mitigation measures provided in the EIR are adopted and would reduce this impact, however, impacts would remain significant and unavaoidable. 5. Findings Concerning Significant impacts Reduced to Less Than Significant Levels by Mitigation Measures incorporated into the Project The EIR identifies significant impacts that are reduced to a "less than significant" level provided that the mitigation measures identified in the EIR are incorporated into the Specific Plan. These measures avoid, minimize, rectify, or reduce the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR to a less than significant level. Air Quality A. Facts 1. New sensitive receptors would be exposed to diesel -fueled Metrolink trains that form an existing source of TAC emissions. Sensitive receptors introduced by the Specific Plan would primarily include residential uses. Toxic air contaminants from Metrolink trains would -be greatest within 300 feet of the tracks, and sensitive receptors within 300 feet from the tracks would be exposed to DPM emissions. Implementation of Mitigation Measures AIR -3 and AIR -4 that require implementation of all available best management practices and control technologies, such as filtered air supply systems, to reduce emissions at sensitive uses to below regulatory thresholds. This would reduce potential impacts related to exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations to a less -than -significant level. Final .. a... 1-1OD Specific ,,, ,�.......... ,m„ ............. ......... , , ........., . .. . ,,,,.__....._ ......... ,_,.... Baldwin fic Plan Project 4 November 2015 Attachment #5: Findings of Facts B. Findings The City finds that: 1. The mitigation measures in the EIR would ensure the project's impacts related to localized air quality from Metrolink trains are reduced to less than significant levels. Cultural Resources A. Facts The likelihood of discovering unknown prehistoric archaeological resources within the Specific Plan area is minimal. However, Native American Tribes have historically traversed the Specific Plan area, and because the nature of the Specific Plan would involve ground -disturbing activities, it is possible that unknown subsurface archaeological, and/or historical, or Native American resources could be disturbed. Implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL -1 would reduce potential impacts to archaeological resources to less -than -significant levels. The Specific Plan area is underlain by younger Quaternary Alluvium, which is unlikely to contain vertebrate fossils. However, the younger Alluvium may be underlain by older Quaternary deposits that are known to contain vertebrate fossils. Fossils have been found within five miles of the Specific Plan area in these types of deposits. Thus, Mitigation Measure CUL -2 is included to reduce this potential impact to a less than significant level. Cumulative impacts related to cultural resources are considered on a broad regional basis, The Specific Plan area is not identified as an area with unique subsurface archaeological or paleontological resources. However, previously unknown and unrecorded resources could exist within the Specific Plan area. Implementation of Mitigation Measures CUL -1 and CUL -2 reduce the potential of project impacts related to archaeological and paleontological to occur, which ensures that cumulative impacts would be less than significant. B. Findings The City finds that: The mitigation measures in the EIR would ensure that potential impacts to archaeological and paleontological resources are reduced to less than significant levels. Noise and Vibration A. Facts Noise from the Metrolink line would be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure N0I-1 that would require all future developments that include residential uses within 500 feet of the Metrolink line to implement appropriate land use Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project O Final EIR November 2015 Attachment #5: Findings of Facts planning for exterior private areas, and implement noise reduction measures and insulation features included in the design to meet the City's interior noise standards of 45 dBA CNEL. With implementation of Mitigation Measure N0I-1, subsequent development projects that would occur pursuant to the Specific Plan would not conflict with the City's noise regulations, and impacts would be less than significant. 2. Mitigation Measures N0I-2 through N0I4 would prohibit the use of construction equipment that generates high levels of vibration within specified distances from sensitive uses to ensure that vibration impacts associated with building damage and human annoyance would be reduced to a less -than -significant level. Mitigation Measure N0I-8 would serve to ensure the safety of historic buildings within the Specific Plan area by requiring a certified structural engineer to analyze and provide evidence that no structural damage would result at these buildings due to the construction of adjacent new developments. Mitigation Measures N0I-2 through N0I4 and N0I-8 would reduce impacts related to groundborne vibration to less than significant. 3. Future development in the Specific Plan area would introduce residential uses in the vicinity of the Metrolink line. Trains are a common source of groundborne vibration, where locomotive -powered passenger trains can generate substantial vibration. Because future mixed use developments associated with the project could be exposed to vibration levels that exceed 75 VdB from the trains traveling through the Specific Plan area, Mitigation Measure N0I-5 would be implemented to ensure that all future developments with a residential component located within 150 feet of the Metrolink line not be exposed to a vibration level exceeding 75 VdB from trains traveling through the Baldwin Park Metrolink Station. With implementation of Mitigation Measure N0I-5, impacts from vibration related to the Metrolink track usage would be reduced to a less -than -significant level. 4. Implementation of Mitigation Measures N0I-2 though N0I-9 would require implementation of noise reduction devices and techniques during construction activities, which would reduce construction noise levels and would reduce the potential of projects resulting in a cumulative construction noise and vibration impacts a less than cumulatively considerable level. B. Findings The City finds that: The mitigation measures would ensure the noise and vibration generated by the project are reduced to less than significant levels. Transportation and Traffic A. Facts Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 6 Final EIR November 2015 Attachment #5: Findings of Facts Addition of traffic from build out of the Specific Plan would cause the level of service (LOS) to worsen at a number of locations. The LOS at the signalized intersection of Ramona Boulevard and Maine Avenue would change from LOS D to LOS F, which is considered a significant impact. However, implementation of Mitigation Measures TRAF-1 would implement street improvements within the existing right-of-way that would reduce impacts related to the Existing Plus Project condition to a less than significant level. All intersections in the traffic study area would operate at LOS D or better during the am and pm peak hours under Future (2035), with exception of the intersections of Ramona Boulevard and Maine Avenue, and Ramona Boulevard and Baldwin Park Boulevard where LOS F would occur during the pm peak hour, and the increase in volume to -capacity ratio would exceed the City's threshold. Implementation of Mitigation Measures TRAF-1 through TRAF-3 would implement street improvements within the existing Ramona Boulevard right-of-way that would reconfigure the approaches to the intersections of Ramona Boulevard and Maine Avenue, and Ramona Boulevard and Baldwin Park Boulevard, which would preclude the ability to provide wider bike lanes adjacent to the vehicular turn lane. B. Findings The City finds that: The mitigation measures would ensure that potential impacts related to LOS are reduced to less than significant level. 6. Findings Concerning Identified impacts that Were Determined to be Less than Significant and Therefore do not Require Mitigation Measures The EIR identifies impacts that are considered to be "less than significant" not requiring mitigation measures. It is hereby determined that the following environmental impacts of the project would be less than significant. Aesthetics A. Facts With build out of the Specific Plan the existing scenic vistas that exist from northward views within roadways and intersections that provide views of this mountain range would not be impacted. Furthermore; the Specific Plan would not introduce structures that would dramatically alter the views available of the Specific Plan area from other areas in the region, which is dominated by urbanized and suburban development in the foreground and the San Gabriel Mountains in the background. Therefore, the implementation of the Specific Plan would result in a less than significant impact to scenic vistas. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project / Final EIR November 2015 Attachment #5: Findings of Facts 2. The Specific Plan provides design guidelines and guides development projects to incorporate architectural elements, which would result in a beneficial effect on the visual character of the area. The development standards, design guidelines, and streetscape improvements provided by the Project would achieve a unifying and identifying character to the Specific Plan area. While the Specific Plan would alter the existing visual character of the area, it would not substantially degrade the area or the surrounding area. Impacts related to visual quality and character would be less than significant. 3. Development within the Specific Plan area would be subject to the light pollution reduction measures of Section 153.140.040 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code and Policy 2.6 of the General Plan Land Use Element. Therefore, impacts related to light and glare from implementation from the Specific Plan are less than significant. B. Findings The City finds that: The Specific Plan would not result in impacts related to scenic vistas, degradation of the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings, and would not create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. In addition, the project would not result in a cumulatively considerable impact when combined with the past, present, and reasonably foreseeable cumulative projects. Thus, these impacts would be less than significant. Air Quality A. Facts The new population that would be generated by the Specific Plan would be within SCAG's growth projections, and thus would be consistent with the 2012 AQMP. In addition, the transit -oriented Specific Plan would support AQMP objectives to reduce trips, and would aid in the implementation of the AQMP. Therefore, impacts related to conflict with or obstruction with an applicable air quality plan would be less than significant 2. Operational emissions associated with the build out of the Specific Plan were modeled and the estimated operations emissions of criteria air pollutants and ozone precursors were determined to be below SCAQMD's applicable thresholds. Therefore, the Specific Plan's operational emissions would not result in or substantially contribute to emissions concentrations that exceed applicable air quality standards and impacts would be less than significant. B. Findings The City finds that: Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project Final EIR November 2015 Attachment #5: Findings of Facts 1. The Specific Plan would not conflict or obstruct implementation of an AQMP. No mitigation measures are necessary. 2. Operation of the Specific Plan would have a less than significant impact related to operational air quality emissions. No mitigation measures are necessary. Cultural Resources A. Facts The Specific Plan prohibits the demolition of the resources or any building in the Specific Plan area that is 50 years old or older, unless it is demonstrated that such building is not a significant historic resource. In addition, any alteration of historically significant buildings is required to be in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring, and Reconstructing Historic Buildings or Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings. Thus, the Specific Plan would have a less than significant impact related to historic resources. No mitigation measures are necessary. 2. In the unlikely event that human remains were discovered during project construction, the California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 requires that all activities cease immediately and the Coroner shall be contacted to evaluate the remains. Compliance with the established regulatory framework (i.e., California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 and Public Resources Code Section 5097.98) would reduce potential impacts involving disturbance to human remains to less than significant. B. Findings The City finds that: 1. The Specific Plan includes policies that would reduce impacts to historic resources to a less than significant level. No mitigation measures are necessary. 2. Adherence to state law would ensure that impacts related to the discovery of human remains would be less than significant. No mitigation measures are necessary. 3. Adherence to the Specific Plan policy related to historic resources and the state laws related to human remains would reduce potential cumulative impacts to historic resources and human remains to a less than significant level. No mitigation measures are necessary. Greenhouse Gas Emissions A. Facts Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project U Final EIR November 2015 Attachment #5: Findinl.js of Facts The Specific Plan's total annual GHG emissions from construction and operational activities would be 19,248.61 MTCO2e per year. When divided by the number of employees and residents the project would introduce into the Specific Plan area, the GHG efficiency threshold of 4.6 MT CO2e per service population per year would not be exceeded. As such, the Specific Plan would not hinder the state's ability to achieve AB 32 goals, and impacts are less than significant for GHG emissions. 2. Implementation of the Specific Plan would not hinder or adversely affect the statewide attainment of GHG emission reduction goals of AB 32 and would be consistent with the CARB Scoping Plan, the SCAG SCS, and the City's General Plan. Therefore, impacts related to conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs would be less than significant. B. Findings The City finds that: Construction and operation of the Specific Plan at build out would not result in the exceedance of GHG thresholds and is consistent with the goals of AB 32, the CARB Scoping Plan, the SCAG SCS, and the City's General Plan. Thus, impacts would be less than significant. No mitigation measures are necessary. Hazards and Hazardous Materials A. Facts The civic, retail, residential, and open space uses within the Specific Plan area would not introduce substantial volumes of hazardous materials to the area. In addition, compliance with federal, state, and local regulations would reduce impacts related to release of hazardous materials during their transport, use, and disposal to a less than significant level. Thus, implementation of the Specific Plan would not create a significant impact to the public or environment related to hazardous materials. 2. Due to the age of the buildings within the Specific Plan area, demolition of existing structures could result in exposure of the public to hazardous substances such as asbestos, PCBs, or lead-based paints. In addition, the disturbance of soils could result in the exposure of construction workers or nearby employees to health or safety risks if contaminated soils are encountered. However, compliance with regulations for handling of hazardous waste would reduce potential impacts to a level that is less than significant. The Specific Plan area is underlain by a plume of contaminated groundwater known as the San Gabriel Valley (Area 2) Baldwin Park National Priorities List. The 19 identified Potentially Responsible Parties are ultimately responsible for funding the design, construction, and operation of groundwater cleanup facilities. The California Department of Health Services approved the design and oversees the operation of four Baldwin Park water treatment systems. Because the contamination is being remediated and is located Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 10 Final EIR November 2015 Attachment #5: Findings of Facts approximately 196 feet below ground it does not present a potential health or safety risk to the project or its users. 4. Sites exist within the Specific Plan that are on the Cortese List and are being remediated per federal and state regulations and oversight, and as described in the Draft EIR, the sites do not pose a human health threat, impact to public safety and the environment. Thus, impacts related to hazardous material sites from implementation of the Specific Plan would be less than significant. Development permitted by the Specific Plan would be required to comply with applicable California Building Code and Uniform Fire Code requirements, the Baldwin Park Multi - hazard Functional Plan, and the Baldwin Park Emergency Preparedness Plan, which would be verified through the City's review process for each project. Therefore, implementation of the Specific Plan would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan, and impacts would be less than significant. B. Findings The City finds that:. The Specific Plan project would result in less than significant impacts involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. The project does not involve development on a site that would create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. The project would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan; and the project would not result in cumulatively considerable impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials. Thus, these hazards and hazardous materials related impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures are necessary. Hydrology and Water Quality A. Facts With compliance with the Construction General Permit, which includes implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would identify erosion and sediment control BMPs that are designed, implemented, and maintained to address pollutants of concern, as required by the provisions of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit, General Permit, For Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction and Land Disturbance Activities (Order No. 2009-09- DWQ). No adverse water quality impacts would occur during construction of activities associated with implementation of the Specific Plan. 2. Subsequent development projects permitted by the Specific Plan would be required to implement Source Control and Treatment Control BMPs to reduce the discharge of pollutants to the maximum extent practicable. Implementation of site-specific source ...... ..e...,, Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 11 Final EIR November 2015 Attachment #5: Findings of Facts control and treatment control BMPs in accordance with the SUSMP standards would remove potential pollutants from runoff and would not contribute additional pollutant loads into receiving waters. Applicable BMPs would be implemented on a case-by-case basis in accordance with County of Los Angeles NPDES MS4 Permit and associated SUSMP requirements, as required per Order R4-2012-0175. As a result, operational impacts related to water quality standards or waste discharge requirements would be less than significant. The total water demand from build out of the Specific Plan would be accommodated by current water sources for the Valley County Water District (VCWD) (Civiltec, 2011) and there would not be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level such that the production rate of existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted. Therefore, impacts related to groundwater supplies would be less than significant. 4. The Specific Plan involves infill development and redevelopment within an existing urban and mainly impervious area, including buildings, paved sidewalks, and parking lots. More than ninety percent of the existing Specific Plan area is impervious, and implementation of the Specific Plan with installation of trees and landscaping as part of streetscape improvements, and BMPs that would be implemented pursuant to NPDES requirements, would result in a decrease in impervious surfaces and increase infiltration and reduce run off, soil erosion, and siltation. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. The Specific Plan area is not located within a 100 -year flood hazard area. Implementation of the project would not place housing or structures within a 100 -year flood zone. Implementation of the Specific Plan with installation of trees and landscaping as part of streetscape improvements, and BMPs pursuant to NPDES requirements, would result in a decrease in impervious surfaces and would not substantially alter existing drainage patterns in such a way as to result in flooding on- or off-site. Impacts related to drainage and flooding are less than significant. Subsequent development projects permitted by the Specific Plan would be required to design, install, and maintain drainage systems according to standards set forth by the County of Los Angeles NPDES MS4 Permit and associated SUSMP requirements, as required per Order R4-2012-0175. Thus, impacts related to the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems are less than significant. 7. The development projects implemented by the Specific Plan would comply with all County of Los Angeles NPDES, SUSMP, and the City's drainage and grading ordinances to control runoff and regulate water quality. Compliance with these regulations would reduce impacts related to water quality pollutants to less than significant. ........ --.. .. w . ......... .., .. ............... .. ......... Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 12 Final EIR November 2015 Attachment #5: Findings of Facts The projects implemented by the Specific Plan and all reasonably foreseeable future projects would be required to implement measures set forth by the County of Los Angeles NPDES MS4 Permit that were developed to reduce the cumulative impacts to water quality and hydrology, and to ensure that the incremental effects of individual projects do not cause a substantial cumulative impact related to water quality, erosion, flooding, and drainage. In addition, the EIR has identified that sufficient water supplies are available to serve build out of the Specific Plan in addition to the existing water supply demand and the demand from the identified related projects. Thus, implementation of the Specific Plan would not result in impacts that would combine to be adversely cumulatively considerable, and cumulative impacts are less than significant. B. Findings The City finds that: The Specific Plan would not result in a significant impact involving violation of water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. The project would not substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge, nor substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area. Additionally, the project would not create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff that would degrade water quality. Furthermore, the project would not result in impacts that could combine to be adversely cumulatively considerable. Thus, these hydrology and water quality related impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures are necessary. Land Use and Planning A. Facts The Specific Plan would provide for additional residential development and improved connectivity within the existing community, and would not result in the division of an established community. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. 2. The Specific Plan would implement many of the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) policies related to high-density, infill development that is pedestrian and transit -oriented. In addition, the Specific Plan would be consistent with other policies related to incentives for energy efficiency, balance of jobs and housing, and utilization of existing infrastructure. Furthermore, inconsistencies between SCAG policies and the Specific Plan would not occur, as described in the Draft EIR. Therefore, the Specific Plan would have a less than significant impact related to applicable land use plans, policies or regulations. 3. The Specific Plan would rezone and amend General Plan land uses of specific parcels within the project area to introduce a transit -oriented development pattern to the area, which is consistent with the existing residential, commercial, and public land uses; and ......... .. " ... ......... _..... ....... ®.n Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 13 Final EIR November 2015 f ' ; consistent with projects within the City of Baldwin Park and areas within the City of Irwindale that are adjacent to the Specific Plan area. The related projects in the cumulative study area. Similar to the Specific Plan, the related projects are infill developments that would reinforce the existing urban and developed character of the area. Therefore, the Specific Plan would not result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to land use impacts. B. Findings The City finds that: 1. The Specific Plan project would not physically divide a community or result in a significant impact involving conflict with any applicable policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. Thus, these land use and planning related impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures are necessary. Noise and Vibration A. Facts The Specific Plan would implement new land uses that would include residential, commercial, civic, open space, and mixed-use developments. Development permits would be provided pursuant to compliance with City Municipal Codes related to noise, which are provided to reduce potential noise impacts. With implementation of existing City regulations, noise impacts from operation of future Specific Plan developments would be less than significant. 2. The Specific Plan would contribute to an increase in local traffic volumes, which results in higher noise levels along local roadways. The traffic volumes introduced by build out of the Specific Plan would increase local noise levels by a maximum of 2.5 dBA CNEL, which would not exceed the identified thresholds of significance. Thus, traffic noise impacts would be less than significant. Implementation of the City's noise standards, which regulate the appropriate location for various types of land uses in relation to noise generation, would ensure that operational noise would not combine with related projects to result in a cumulatively considerable increase in ambient noise from operating land uses. 4. The primary noise source contributing to cumulative operational noise levels from future development projects under the Specific Plan and related projects would be traffic. As shown' cumulative development at build out of the Specific Plan would not increase noise levels above the 5 dBA CNEL noise threshold. Therefore, cumulative impacts associated with mobile source noise would be less than significant. B. Findings Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 14 Final EIR November 2015 Attachment #5: Findings of Facts The City finds that: Operation of the Specific Plan would not result in exposure of persons to, or generation of, noise levels in excess of standards established in the City's General Plan or noise ordinance that regulates the location of new uses. In addition, vehicular noise from implementation of the Specific Plan would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures are necessary. Population and Housing A. Facts The Specific Plan would accommodate anticipated growth and assist in meeting housing demands from projected population growth in the City and the region. Build out of the Specific Plan would not exceed the estimated projections on which the City has based plans related to provision of public services, utilities, and other amenities to maintain the current quality of life it provides its residents. As such, the project would result in less than significant impacts related to population and housing. The identified related projects would provide commercial and residential uses that would be consistent with the Specific Plan land uses, and are within SCAG's population projections. The Specific Plan, in combination with development of cumulative projects in the area, would not induce substantial population growth in the project area, and cumulatively considerable impacts related to population and housing would be less than significant. B. Findings The City finds that: The Specific Plan would not result in a significant impact involving population growth, either directly or indirectly. The Specific Plan would plan for the location of future mixed -uses that are within walking distance from the Metrolink station and growth that is consistent with regional projections. Thus, population and housing related impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures are necessary. Public Services A. Facts 1. The Specific Plan area is within 1.5 miles of two fire stations (Station 29 and 48) that currently provide services to the area. The Specific Plan would result in a gradual increase in calls for fire services over the incremental implementation of the plan and the fire department would add staff, equipment, and maintenance on an as -needed basis in order to accommodate these increased demands over the 20 year Specific Plan planning period. However, no new or physically altered fire protection facilities would be required ...... _ e....____ ..... ......... ,, Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 15 Final EIR November 2015 Attachment #5: Findings of Facts to serve the build out of the Specific Plan; thus, implementation of the Specific Plan would have less than significant impact related to fire protection services. 2. Build -out of the Specific Plan is estimated to require four additional sworn officers to maintain the current ratio of 0.92 officers per 1,000 residents. The demand for police services would increase gradually over the incremental implementation of the Specific Plan; however, the City's police station, which is located adjacent to the Metrolink station within the Specific Plan area, would not require physical alteration, which could cause significant environmental impacts. Thus, impacts related to police facilities are less than significant. 3. Development throughout the Specific Plan area is subject to the impact fees of SB 50, which constitutes full mitigation related to school facilities under CEQA. With implementation of SB 50 fees, impacts related to school facilities are less than significant. 4. As described in the Draft EK new or physically altered facilities would not be required to accommodate build out of the Specific Plan in combination with related projects. Therefore, the contribution of the Specific Plan to cumulative impacts on public utilities would not be cumulatively considerable. The new residents generated by build out of the Specific Plan are anticipated to utilize Morgan Park, the Arts Park, other City park and recreation facilities, and the existing regional parks. the addition of the 3,665 new residents over the 20 -year planning horizon is not anticipated to result in need for new or physically altered facilities in order to maintain acceptable performance objectives for parks and recreation. 6. The cumulative projects include development of 163 residential units within the City of Baldwin Park (73 of which are within the Specific Plan area), which would combine with the Specific Plan development to gradually increase use of park and recreational facilities. However, the City implements the Quimby Act, which allows the City, by ordinance, to require the dedication of land, the payment of fees in -lieu of, or a combination of both, as a condition to the approval of a final tract map or parcel map. The Baldwin Park Municipal Code provides a dedication ratio of three acres of park area for 1,000 residents, a density factor of 4.44 persons per dwelling unit, and payment of parkland fees pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 154: Development Fees. Each development project proposed within the City would be required to comply with these Municipal Code requirements related to payment of fees and/or dedication of facilities or parkland, which would offset the increased demand for park and recreation facilities generated by build out of the Specific Plan. Overall, the addition of the new residents from the Specific Plan and cumulative projects over the 20 -year planning horizon are anticipated to be served by Morgan Park, the Arts Park, and other existing City and County park and recreation facilities; and implementation of the Specific Plan in addition to the cumulative projects would not result in the need for new or physically altered park and recreation facilities that could result in environmental impacts. Therefore, the Baldwin Park TOD Specifc Plan Project 16 Final EIR November 2015 Attachment #5: Findings of Facts contribution of the Specific Plan to cumulative impacts on park and recreation facilities would be less than cumulatively considerable. B. Findings The City finds that: The Specific Plan would not result in a significant impact involving the need for new or physically altered fire, police, school, or park and recreation facilities; the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives. Thus, public service and park and recreation related impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures are necessary. Transportation and Traffic A. Facts 1. All development within the Specific Plan would be required to be consistent with City street, sidewalk and public place design standards (outlined in Chapter 97 of the City's Municipal Code). As a result, implementation of the Specific Plan would result in less than -significant impacts associated with potential traffic safety design hazards. 2. Development activities would not be allowed to result in potential impacts related to emergency access, as all projects are required to go through development review and approval with the City Planning Department and Fire Department. For those reasons, implementation of the Specific Plan would result in less than -significant impacts associated with provision of adequate emergency access. B. Findings The City finds that: 1. Build out of the Specific Plan would have less than significant impacts related to increase hazards due to design features or emergency access. No mitigation measures are necessary. Utilities and Service Systems The residential, commercial, and open space land uses implemented by the Specific Plan would not discharge wastewater that contains harmful levels of toxins that are regulated by the LARWQCB and all effluent would be required to comply with the wastewater treatment standards of the RWQCB. In addition, the San Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant has an excess treatment capacity of approximately 29.6 million gallons per day and would have sufficient capacity to process the additional average wastewater flow of Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 17 Final EIR November 2015 Attachment #5: Findings of Facts 216,634 gallons per day that would be generated by the Specific Plan at build out. As a result, the project would result in less than significant impacts related to the wastewater treatment requirements of the RWQCB and wastewater treatment capacity. 2. The increased sewer flows with build out of the Specific Plan would be accommodated by the capacity of the planned sewer system, and the increase in flows from build out of the Specific Plan would not require expansion of any wastewater infrastructure (Baldwin Park, 2014). Implementation of the Specific Plan with installation of trees and landscaping as part of streetscape improvements, and BMPs that would be implemented pursuant to NPDES requirements, would result in a decrease in impervious surfaces and would reduce the overall amount of surface runoff generated and entering existing storm drains. Therefore, new development pursuant to the Specific Plan would not result in the need to expand storm drain facilities. Thus, impacts to the environment resulting from the construction or expansion of storm water drainage facilities would be less than significant. 4. The land uses within the Specific Plan area are anticipated to build out by 2035; at which time the Valley County Water District (VCWD) would have approximately 452.55 AFY of surplus supplies available. The Specific Plan would utilize 57.45 AFY at full build out, leaving 395.10 AFY as available surplus supplies. As a result, the Specific Plan would not result in the need for new or expanded water supply entitlements. The total water demand generated from the Specific Plan would be accommodated by current water sources from the VCWD. Therefore, impacts related to water supply entitlements would be less than significant. 5. The San Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant has an excess treatment capacity of approximately 29.6 million gallons per day and would have sufficient capacity to process the additional average wastewater flow of 216,634 gallons per day that would be generated by the Specific Plan at build out. Thus, the Specific Plan would not result in the exceedance of wastewater treatment plant capacity and the total wastewater generated by the project would be accommodated by current wastewater facilities for the SJCWRP. Thus, impacts to the wastewater treatment plan are less than significant. 6. Build out of the Specific Plan would generate an additional 11,923 pounds (5.96 tons) of solid waste per day; 50 percent of which would be recycled and/or diverted from landfills and 50 percent of which (2.98 tons per day) would be disposed of at Azusa landfill that accepts a maximum of 8,000 tons of solid waste per day. The landfill has a remaining capacity of 51,512,201 cubic yards, and there is approximately 64 percent of the permitted space remaining. The current permit anticipates operation of the landfill through 2045. Therefore, the addition of solid waste from implementation of the project would be within the permitted capacity of the landfill, and impacts related to solid waste facilities would be less than significant. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 18 Final EIR November 2015 Attachment #5: Findings of Facts 7. All uses within the Specific Plan area will be required comply with all federal state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. Impacts would be less than significant. Cumulative projects consist of commercial, light industrial (warehouse) and infill residential projects would increase the use of water and reduce the available water surplus supplies. However, exiting water supplies would continue to be available after build out of the Specific Plan and the cumulative projects. Therefore, there are sufficient water supplies to support the existing and related developments. As a result, implementation of the Specific Plan would not result in cumulatively considerable impacts related to water supply. 9. The San Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant has an excess treatment capacity of approximately 29.6 million gallons per day, which would provide sufficient capacity to process the additional average wastewater flow of 216,634 gallons per day that would be generated by the Specific Plan at build out, in addition to the flows generated by the cumulative projects. As a result, implementation of the Specific Plan would not result in cumulatively considerable impacts related to wastewater treatment. 10. Build out of the Specific Plan would result in a decrease in impervious surfaces and would reduce the overall amount of surface runoff generated and entering existing storm drains. Therefore, build out of the Specific Plan would not result in impacts related to stormwater drainage that could combine to be cumulatively considerable. Thus, cumulative impacts related to storm drain facilities would be less than significant. 11. The Specific Plan would result in a solid waste increase of less than 0.1 percent of the maximum permitted waste per day. The related projects are similar in nature and would require similar amounts of waste disposal. Because the cumulative increase is less than half a percent and the landfill is operating with capacity until 2O45, there is sufficient capacity to support the existing land uses, build out of the Specific Plan, and the related projects. B. Findings The City finds that: The Specific Plan would not result in a significant impact to the environment involving conflict with wastewater treatment requirements of the RWQCB, water supplies, stormwater drainage infrastructure, water and wastewater, and landfill facility and service capacity. Utility and service system related impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures are necessary. Growth Inducement A. Facts Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 19 Final EIR November 2015 Attachment #5: Findings of Facts The Specific Plan would provide for increase of approximately 833 residential, which is anticipated to increase the City of Baldwin Park's population by approximately 3,665; and approximately 289,135 square feet of non-residential employment generating uses that would create 755 employment opportunities by build out of the Specific Plan in 2035. This growth would not exceed SCAG projections upon which the City has based plans related to provision of public services, utilities, and other amenities to maintain the current quality of life it provides its residents. In addition the population estimated in the Draft EIR is conservative estimate because it assumes that the maximum number of residential units allowed under the Specific Plan would be constructed and that full occupancy (no vacancy) would occur. The introduction TOD near the Metrolink Station would reduce the effects of growth by reducing vehicle trips and providing residential uses within walking distance of commercial and open space areas. Although the proposed Specific Plan project would result in growth, it would be self-contained, and conform to regional and local projections and policies for sustainable growth. The planned TOD land uses and pedestrian linkages in the Specific Plan are designed to centralize population and employment growth so that growth over time is sustainable. The Specific Plan does not add additional roadways, lanes, or extend roadways to areas not served by vehicular traffic, in a manner that would increase capacity, such that growth would occur. The improvements proposed by the Specific Plan would enhance circulation to provide for multi -modal transportation. Overall, implementation of the Specific Plan would result in less than significant indirect growth inducing impacts. B. Findings The City finds that: The TOD development implemented by the Specific Plan would not exceed SCAG projections and would be sustainable overtime. Overall, implementation of the Specific Plan would result in less than significant indirect growth inducing impacts. 7. Findings Concerning Alternatives CEQA requires an EIR to describe a reasonable range of alternatives to the project or to the location of the project, which could feasibly attain the project objectives and to evaluate the comparative merits of the alternatives. Alternatives to the Specific Plan evaluated in the EIR include the: No Project Alternative, Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative, and Reduced Development Alternative. No Project Alternative (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 20 Final EIR November 2015 Attachment #5: Findings of Facts Implementation of the No Project Alternative would represent the continuation of the existing Baldwin Park General Plan and the Zoning Ordinance. None of the changes under the Specific Plan would take place, including development of a new Arts Park across from City Hall. Pursuant to the existing General Plan and zoning, some intensification of development and some new mixed use uses would occur. The resulting development of new land uses under this alternative would be less than build out of the Specific Plan. The architectural design elements under this alternative would be similar to the existing conditions, and would not unify the Downtown area, as would be done by the Specific Plan. This alternative would not result in the introduction of unifying design and development guidelines that are intended to create a distinctive center for the Downtown area with attractive streets and public spaces that would be implemented by the Specific Plan. The No Project (Build Out According to Existing Zoning) Alternative would not implement TOD development in a planned manner that would maximize TOD opportunities within the area. With the absence of a Specific Plan to guide development through 2035, TOD would be considered on a project -by -project basis, which would not provide for a cohesive future land use plan that would maximize TOD land use and circulation opportunities. This alternative would not implement SCAG policies that encourage greater densities in areas with TOD opportunities and less dependence on the automobile. Therefore, this alternative would not result in an improvement in aesthetics and enhancement of character within the Downtown area nor would it achieve the project objectives of providing pedestrian linkages or TOD connectivity. The City finds that this alternative is less desirable than the Specific Plan and rejects this alternative for the following reason: 1. The EIR concluded that while the No Project (No Build) Alternative would result in fewer environmental impacts than the Specific Plan, it would not meet the project objectives of providing pedestrian linkages or the TOD connectivity. Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative The Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative would remove the area proposed to remain Industrial Commercial in the northeastern area from the Specific Plan and would not provide for additional residential uses within 500 feet of the Metrolink station. This alternative would develop 130 fewer residential units and 27,217 fewer square feet of non-residential space than the Specific Plan. Compared to the Specific Plan, the potential environmental impacts from the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative would be less than the Specific Plan in the areas of operational air quality, greenhouse gasses, operational noise, population and housing, public services and recreation, and utilities. The Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative would have similar impacts related to aesthetics, construction related air quality, cultural resources, hydrology, water quality, construction noise, hazardous materials, transportation and traffic. The Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative would have greater impacts related to land use and planning than the proposed Specific Plan. Additionally, the Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative would not reduce the significant and unavoidable construction air quality and noise impacts of the proposed Specific Plan to a less than significant level. Because this alternative would allow less mixed use and high density residential development near the Metrolink Station compared to the proposed Specific Plan, it would not maximize the potential for TOD development within the Downtown area and Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 21 Final EIR November 2015 Attachment #5: Findings of Facts would be less consistent with the SCAG policies that encourage maximizing opportunities related to TOD and less dependence on the automobile. The Reduced Specific Plan Area Alternative would implement the Project objectives; however, to a lesser degree than the proposed Specific Plan. The City finds that this alternative is less desirable than the proposed Specific Plan and rejects this alternative for the following reason: 1. The No Project Build -out to Existing Specific Plan Alternative would result in fewer environmental impacts than the proposed Specific Plan and it would meet many of the project objectives. However, the reduced density and less mixed use development near the near the Metrolink Station compared to the proposed Specific Plan, would not maximize the potential for TOD development within the Downtown area and would be less consistent with the SCAG policies that encourage maximizing opportunities related to TOD and less dependence on the automobile. Reduced Development Alternative The Reduced Development Alternative would reduce the overall increase in maximum development allowed under the proposed Specific Plan by 25 percent. This alternative would develop 208 fewer residential units and 72,284 less square feet of non-residential space than the proposed Specific Plan. This alternative would provide an Arts Park, active storefronts, pedestrian nodes with amenities such as street furniture, and lighting. In addition, this alternative would implement all of the circulation improvements included in the proposed Specific Plan. The environmental impacts from the Reduced Development Alternative would be less than the proposed Specific Plan in the areas of operational air quality, greenhouse gasses, hazardous materials, operational noise, population and housing, public services and recreation, transportation and traffic, and utilities. The Reduced Development Alternative would have similar impacts related to aesthetics, construction related air quality, cultural resources, hydrology, water quality, construction noise. The Reduced Development Alternative would have greater impacts related to land use and planning than the proposed Specific Plan. Additionally, the Reduced Development Alternative would not reduce the significant and unavoidable construction air quality and noise impacts of the proposed Specific Plan to a less than significant level. The City finds that this alternative is less desirable than the proposed Specific Plan and rejects this alternative for the following reason: Compared to the proposed Specific Plan, the potential environmental impacts from the Reduced Project Alternative would be less than the proposed Specific Plan. The Reduced Project Alternative would meet project objectives; however, to a lesser degree than the proposed Specific Plan. The Reduced Project Alternative would not maximize the potential for TOD development within the Downtown area and would be less consistent with the SCAG policies that encourage maximizing opportunities related to TOD and less dependence on the automobile. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 22 Final EIR November 2015 Attachment #5: Findings of Facts Of the alternatives analyzed in the ETR, the Reduced Development Alternative is the environmentally superior alternative because it would reduce the proposed Plan's significant impacts to a greater extent because it represents the least amount of development spread over a larger area. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project 23 Final EIR November 2015 ATTACHMENT #6 STATEMENT . VE_:N CONSIDERATIONS Attachment #5 Statement of Overriding Considerations C' #5 Omm�mm Statement gConsiderations CEQA requires that the decision makers balance the benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve the project (Public Resources Code Section 21081(b); 14 CCR Sections 15043, 15093(a)). As documented in the EIR and explained in the Findings of Fact for the proposed Specific Plan project, the project will potentially result in significant and unavoidable impacts in the following environmental areas: • Air quality during construction and operational activities; • Cumulative air quality impacts; • Temporary or periodic ambient noise impacts. The project provides substantial benefits for the City of Baldwin Park Downtown area, which include: opportunities to build on the City's unique historic and cultural characteristics to enhance the Downtown core; take advantage of the location of the Metrolink Station and access to regional transit; create a strong community identity and sense of place; provide new employment, housing and shopping opportunities; and strengthen the City's tax base. Opportunities exist within walking distance of the Metrolink Station to provide for infill development and adaptive reuse of existing under-utilized structures to better serve the transit -oriented Downtown area and generate new investment. The proposed Specific Plan is intended to guide future development of mixed uses in a walkable environment, streamline the development process, and serve as an incentive for economic development. This City has balanced the project's benefits against the project's significant unavoidable impacts related to air quality and short-term ambient noise. The City finds that the benefits of the Specific Plan outweigh its significant unavoidable impacts. Therefore, the project's significant unavoidable impacts are acceptable in light of the project's benefits. The City finds that each of the following benefits is an overriding consideration, independent of the other benefits, that warrants approval of the Specific Plan notwithstanding the Specific Plan's significant and unavoidable impacts: 1. The Specific Plan would provide new employment and housing opportunities in the Downtown area, proximate to the Metrolink station. 2. The Specific Plan would provide multi -modal streets to accommodate pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicles in the Downtown area that would connect to the Metrolink station and would reduce dependence upon automobiles. Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project I Final EIR SOC November 2015 Attachment #5: Statement of overriding Considerations 3. The Specific Plan would create a pedestrian -friendly mixed-use environment with buildings and streetscapes designed to provide a strong community identity and sense of place; 4. The land uses provided by the Specific Plan would increase the level of goods and services available to residents of the community while strengthening the City's tax base, Baldwin Park TOD Specific Plan Project L Final EIR SOC November 2015 ATTACHMIENT #7 MITIGATION MONI.'.TOR.tN("Y-'P"ROGR..AM � W 0Z 01 as a� a- z() WW O °- w 0 Z Z Q 00 Z Z 00 E D O� Oa Z 0 Cl � J � m O) C E F- 0 CL N 0 V c R m c w C 0 c c o0o =Q y c mtE O aC E� ay) 7 N R � a) 0 C U r o 2 w �a � y c cy 0(DM 0a)cd oom 0a)M mw 2 —a:5mw E 6 F 2 >C R > C R > C R > C R O L C O= ®L C N U N U N U N U O U� ® U0." ® may-. o Uy� O a) O a3 O °S ff a) `o °) a) IL a in a. a U a s U) a_ a (n a) a) a) a) d O_ a a O O O _O > C > C > C OC OO OO a) O �O ❑ N ❑ N ❑ fq ❑ N C ❑ C ❑ C ❑ C ❑ 7 )T 7 0) 7 O) 7 O) E c E c E c E c Ea E:2 E:2 E:9 UUUUm m m m a D :�,- a U m U ca U m U m c a) c a) R C N CO a) a) O .0 .L.. ) C O a N O -0 .8 O .0 w a) a) N U ..+ y 000 9 to Z4' y oOO2 '>ai y oho N .2-0 a) O a) C j N r- w U o m C 7 c U `" CO d C o N C 7 7 R > C N :2 R y 0 R U w 7 R 0 "' 7 R y 'O N C a) C• O 'O N C U O) N i5 ' C N c - N a- C .y, R co a) R C y R N 0 C C O c y 0 R N 0 C y R N a) oU deo �?>ca 0 oho' cQ 00 E a)UO ov mho a) Em c R0 L) a) ER E U0 N ER c)a) Em .0 O N O .L.+ C O y 7 R 0 C O N N C O .y.. N C U N C U co .L-� a) N C U C U d o 0 f`0 R F- y C n .L O N R 3 C d y� O N N o_ E O R 7 C U w Q N 7 C r- U 0 = •- 7 C �r- U 7 C �«- U N E N o V o w 0 o N E N 0$ C o'o P a E y N 0 U m E N O U E o o` a) �� � E o o` a) °'m w v E o o_ ` a) E o o` a) C N N 00 C 'j 4_ C a) N O R w w c a) .y O C a) N O O N 0 c .L-� E 73 0 N o c «L+ O a) 0 N ca o c w O a o. c .L.. m-0 QU d 5 E c N ca QU o•E N oL •�� cu = o U CD d �� aU d E �vdc-0mm'vo Em��`c`o Ec Em Rw�mc E woo vo �°)ooa�a�E� vo��$a� C, ca �o� �a�n �oW�0 �° �� E ova�io c7)o v� EC) mm ono ���E �n�6. C C C C U U a. a) E R C .c U U U S R U g c U U C C SS 0 LD N w a {? ca p a) 0 a a () m w O) N a) y C': C C o a) p •C 3m0000 c wa)oc c°)) wa w�Ewy y`o C7 N O C O O C O R 3 L a) O C R C N 0 0.° 0 N 0 N N a C R L N V- ca= -0> c U L -o R 0 co .0 L].. 'E a) ? N 'RO w s •p o f EoEmoNRo2 a)cEami E a) )-2 c > C0) fn0 -ow —E'�c y: 2o(D w �a axa) aRa) y�>,a)cE > L C U U 0 •7 ..+ w U > 3> N > N GP,1 7 E y R. m N C>13 R N a) O .0 CL N C N `m N w N R 20) t� U 7 C "y ?. U„ .. N ` a H U O) R 0 C 0 0 0 i +-' N R L O) E a) ca oo_ R O ,IC N U ,:'� U o 0 R 0 N U a) E o� E o L c a) � N C o> N 2 c -'w-- c m o= a"� a R OO a)� RE 0 7 C .3 c~« O 0 0 fy9 N C> .a pA N w- C 0 •N '� N N U L ` n�>� �pa�� o t2 15) Oc C) ry o c o �'> aO d c R N •O R C 3 a) w U' V c a) o a N N R N C 0. o y U N fD C E a) L tS3 " tl), U- O C ❑ (O O w yy? C w RI -> E��yc wo�2ca m0c-�) wO_<a OOV a) N R U 0 C a 00. 'O Aro o a) o R U 'C 0 N fA U �cn ajf O N EL 222o.2 -0 N O N N y 2 0 0 a) y :. .pr. �- a) r'n y U R H 7 S '§ C V >> N U C C E 6 CU o •N C o' c U .L�+ m C C T N> Q> a) L .0- E N O x E� a) L a) N U M M .c � N C R` R C t ci L 'N : zi c O_) N Z 7 E o U +0•, N L -a N> y 7 >+ y N S I Ep y y E R U a, N o Q N f6 L �` C G- Z f� - , U 7 N R ?'w C. a) x > b T y 0 7 0 0 V O C •7 N C a p R N V R N E N w .y U a) C a) C a o (� >, 0 y J 7 L R E o j o y EO y R> c 3 t R w MLR. g c N E C o L R N t Q C F- miaER• S od I-m'�La)v P�¢� ony�<cc> 'i HfCLa>— N N `) _ a) •O) . -C ? N Q N w .� C 0 CNdz. R .o E 2 +L••' N .O>-. _ (O °) c'rn� c a' m 2 o °mow o T cu a)� y E c ami min dY'N g w a QE o E7L >>>Ro,a 7 aEiNm'000Cy0 a6P0 E = o N E O' U N Q Q > C a) O' a a) N E 0 U 0 .2 ` 0 L d L L j d R C ` N 0 'C QYS fl) C. R yLr R 0 L O 0 Y N U N N d p~ w N N L U N N (4 7 q _ R O 0.cu 0.y7 c,-:) f7q -r,- C y 2` C R N R p ri O_ 7 R •N >> O R E CR 7 N C N R 10 N E O R >i V a) R. L o )Wl "' a). N •C 0 R L 0 ccao' m N� �_mvoN ado ayi�E)cRw� R C R C) U 0 R N N C a- 0 R C C Q_ w E '; R 2 p i O a N dcD y cl a� N E 'E L E lO] o a w C « =.o-- a) E R > c coo c .0 o o'a 0 N o �ww'm E. O) U 0 0 C C' O7 U C-' 47i 0.:7 qty N) C N 0 O) U O C C a 0 0-:E L U C U N E �= d 7 O 0 „y7, ; .o N f6 O 2 N 0 .'' a a) R y �cnrnEm>coiP mo �cn rn'N� RS.LwCwRa �cA°3Eu>ia I A a) O W a. 0 Z O a w W ❑ z a z O F - z O 2 z 0 Q 0 F- 2 W W z J IL U U W IL U) O z O z O ❑ Y 0- z z O J Q m O O Co mw o mw o >C ro > C N o = C O` C o.. -Ca aim cu @ � a F O N U V 2 +y U y_ U O a) a) 8.(u (u U • O Q• nU) a nU c aci o E a 0 0 N C a) yO OO p ❑ N 7 07 0 m EC EC CO 7 0 7 O Um Um CL o a) U U m m ro E C N O U c O C N o m�3 T U T ro y & 7 ro N C N G N ro N a7 c y ro N a7 2 E U N O U U N O U a io 0 c •o E b y c °o .- ro 0 o a sn o cu o n 0 at) C �' 7 C U 7 C-- U > E U N a) O C C N d O c c 5 a) ,.a) f6E N o� aiE y°c°a p ..cQ Eo oCD `ai EO 2. C ° a) c C O N U O> > N 0 722E°° °aa) o cw a1 oc c 0 N 0 rna o 3 rna a$ 3 O i+ d O j O a7 C> U r 0 a) C> U sY E w o c mrn E— oc a ro Q to 0 c a7 > a7 aa) `0 a� > m a7 f6 c rn `0 y= a o aa$•n a 0 as 2'n •9Uy a `7 C 0 E C C i� U C ro C C U U a) 0O - a� _ ai L O "S:S O O N y N d "ca C c w0., .:- C N W 7 I Rb d17 aa) 21 227 c 4) � 0 a7 c roma fi7 c A °1' T ray 0 c. _ nW �� asp 0 as ra a as 0 c. 0 0 c 0 1 > O •, a Y j, ro as O rv_.. (` U gam. ai C 0.17 , I�J.. U°� Ga.. U L rla :�l ,- - C cu CD yTsao a7� a �raaN�L(10 1° c y dcagL"eria Q 0.'Y N ro "^ uga ° U O irr �.-. N C7. a7 'c N 9119 as 1111 :5 l.a R Od c a 0 a) x3aa �cc s�0 EN o.'au a as a 7 d9y0ci� r `mroaas c m o ° 0, as 0.o,ce d�Ea7 c a) Ns O, a rnN c ro 0�ro. 's6 . y' �a0N �aa> as E va' Ec Oro . C N U a3 N W O C7Y �y j ro 'dY c N f"7 7r a9 4"Y. •Cp tY C dJ^1 aY C O Ca 60.9 a1 'C. C= E Y U C LpN U '; +J N ., N C [� } 117 C {� d? Ol fC W7 .O O" a� a a N E m a5 0' as ea ro N yr °o ° 0 c a7 0 c 9_ 0 c cn > c L r di N a9 ¢ a wad `mcaEro c ° cn' aNa uosu i 5wML c, C T o. 0- aj m o N c ata o � ca " c_. I `a c a',¢ U m aa- .s_ ro xti oa E cr arca LY C13y E a M 'a a�,a s99 0 E � aro7:�' c a 0 t1 �va- F" N N O as ="7 dA] a) .7 t7, W O'Y i5 "9:7 T' O 0 co c c C0 mm U Afa1� a7, -c) Oma o ca ,v (n a c « p 'c - CD �+ as «trrr wa��1 0 Ea o cz 00 ° 0 c na c 0.Y7' a '� aY 'O 0 C C r E c O.g1',., C a�7 0011' vj U � 0 "C� E 7 91 � E U � O L N N O .g O 4 O . i.7 Ca '[ c ma CO} 3C O" '"' f O. • 'KCJ �O. a) yXy 9mi. F EQcncc°aacaim"raN�acigx7CL m tvs Q y ° m ro ,L C:H '� a7,_� a7 ft} 91"9 d7 65b C C E C7 as y. dCV C, L :E O CD a) O a) U Y N y a ° d U LV L y 9 G ° £� y i7 > N rta E' mS Q. c ❑ N N y ° k... C Ma'I ,i :". N N a) Pyy 67 �C7'i 11' ,C 'Ed :r'-". y C. U Tal " c - -0 � .c x •� E E w N 0 9 y , L E as 'w > .0 cm°€NvEaaia° as'Cc yCL EL o y �DucE?:�cr0r° c C T y y„ U C > ';' G7 ✓,i' C d4 Z7 a0.� L . ' ,.L, N rf� A C7 .c% aci 'o 'a 0 0 '� C N � yr y c 0.C,` ar ma as 907 nj ri 0.v „g ? C E qSa c c. ro N a a9 b".7.. 6 - .qY N .01 y U p;Y O 7"wC° 9� ,� dv1 dL.7 � °�. �.,.o � M O ..,� Q dq G„ia, d"7 0 k7 N U Q L N V a) a7 g� . ` L. U ra � c 0 a9 0 1 a %�a6 OW � N R� J mQ=r�ca�r�a��i� �iar"c°ticIZ N° a" d9fiEy rn c a (A N ° 0� r 0 su g a ra wa ca as a as c as is ro CCC a_ N C68 s 8 Y a 7 {ryg tl a �- C T 4L Y " G N a) O Y7 U Y t o Do' oro E aa— a>— cY ca ca E a; 0 a 0 0 as c a7 oiam alta 0 o c C1 a9 ' a N ro N 4 - cuOb Lu > 5 O U m p "kC 6q '_ '0 E �' � X- iOR�,� .� c. 0.gy (� 16 aar � .4TR d6F � �' C as O c N N 4'S7. N O C 0 7� T.A �"' a1 i� O 1417 c �'" d''1 C N O m. y SZ ° a U c y °� , G. n"m sac m sa ds7 i9 l cm7c c°Q0 a'4a�m sco" Qat 0C P ° as Eguz''0a2 c NO"a a) C1 O .LO. y C.MY N 7 fa a7 9Y C� Cy dp , 'O lTi} N C01' O O L O O >., O L E N O E .0 ,+- sdlw ?_ .) i UG U O> y C' N E �.+ C UA 97, E a> of w « m .r 0 sx O a N 0 "c V 9d y 0 0 N nS ca , sro la m7 ......_ 19 a a : as i1 ap L as G �Z 0� Ito CL OV zU � W O a. W ❑ 0�O Q�: 0 Z Z 00 �0 0 O� CL _z �o � J � m O N l6 C6:5 d O L) U m O' O (U C6 C6 �.• w m 0 7 > C CO O C > 'O 47 o n n n� > C m O` L C E cu U o f o d ca a Co cu f N U . Op- Nr� O:t-C O N �U " O faCU N O pna n `m• a -p a� a ncUN � a) c v � a� En n a o p 0 >c > N ago Q N azo N mo N a C Q -E E C C� `+ a 7 p) E 7 m E 7 m EF- c E:2 o p o U m m U U m y a:' U m C U m C U m N m N rL N D O N O RU) O N O NN C N C 0 N ' o• 7 co U-): 7 C6 N 'C O C .N,, N U o U U Im C i Cd N O V 0 a) U Q w m N U N a) 0 U N 7 E`EN �N a co aCOL c'o N C: N a m a) a N O `o a� o m w o E O) E �E 2 N N O C �E N2G) N O C K ..2 0, Eo'c mE on7 CU Eo o u Eo N !A p C N N o c CU 'D aa) g m �a a$ 3 ma n 0 3 O« v O O 7 E n __ ) C U E o E c _ .O .LO-• C U E a d c IYwO Q N> CU '5 cu m> N CU p N> O a) p O_ d C 7p7 _ —0 a 7E U V 27 V0EU C.) C.) 0. U C w CU aOL cu 6 Cud s 7a F�4L, •�, Ezaa as m ° �. A: �y� N n M197 ": 6J r � .G'm r- CLO 7 . N C S9.. " enl C t6} ,wlk 6" E E GM7, 6'73 CL C. mU C7' ^, C[y Z1 .0 p ,.Op O I:SY C N -6R CAb N 935 C3 �^ 6 O p CCb " CFS Cb U O CL _N N L) 0 :. COY dam. i1i C U cc 7 tlk 01) dab fC , Lb C 97 C m "7 C, tiC C77 2 4Od. „Q:« � n � cl,ai F 43 7. 4C,b wp„ro• N OCL E ca) s^^. '7 5 4l4 C C+ N, al 'CJ) ' Cd7 '7-� 'eq k'01 7 C Ck. C "L; U O m w U C �" ^s 7 L W.^.. N M14F w'. . 4kb AC -y, CA. > tk7 t/1. du 4) v.• +'� {d' - C dy '.'"'O VB.. cm as p 0 a7 ctac NDN � o) ID r c c D o m (A, ' a 6 1 0> E� w 0 o E OL.l o . i.: 0, iC9 aW C C 0 � � o y) U >� 'U;,47"�y)'m0. > aNf7r .OG p > CSL N > )Y �p N < %'4M . w ✓ 9Fr •` eC7 U 'O C7 4kA "'� -...o; m 977 "C] n m C' a m �` p rti C: n M ,C9 Q) m ,'"a C Ca 7 O- � d, mC. 'j 4AF {g} p3 o X45 Z N C , USF r A) CS C C i15, •a w :5 `, 9➢b C _ a" sJb 7 E 4t > 0. p' �O} 'Cs' .L:,) m mmN m CFY "O - W7 N k"" O d '7 r'p.. O fk7 C U y CO C. W o., apre !^�'. -0 = C6 :Dm 7 4 d5A M C N »O O O p ,y�'kw- ¢yq r.N AL n. (7 a a C a a m CL'7 Y/7 7 O ("7 C d a N m d N ? aF 1p C RF C. N y l7F A7 C) f` i..} "O d15 797 O ;� O uj 7 N CS CS d Q C O O )9...) C CY ...b 4NCi a O N N y N O C 'C' U iC) N C o "G7 �,Y, 4"7 ,Cy d O b U O 0 C p m 6F ?.. O Q) y p N E 7 � m a� O) c p7b� 7 d N l6 N N N y im m� ,4 C a w y rd. O m O `r O l6 O O 6? N c!3 ) O. r 9U 4[} N tl7 U 0.J Kola 'm 41, 3 m e C7 Z 2 Z 2 Z J Z Z �.a� yea N O q) Gp.7 CT m u �w OZ OJ �a a 0 V Z U W W O a W 0 w Q� 0 0 ZZ 00 20 0 O� oa Z (7 0 F- J � Oa0 a) c P N C 0 Q N N ix 0 N U tw o a) ca �a�-: 2 O a) CO mw 2 0 a) m row 2 0 a) mw >a) U C' N > C m m > c m O aY m p C m O >O C 01 n� ncA aU a) ca o nen 0�a CU a m C_ O U E L p 0- C p 2 0 0 0J- a- m C,-§ d ncn CL 0.. C. d ncn d n C E C N a 0 0 > c> C N > p0. N O C. U) D N cn O? O .O ON c> 7 O) E c 7 cm E c 7 m E c 7 E c co E:9 E:9 E EY m 07 a 9 O 7 Um O 7 Um UcoU m y 5 <Uca Um w Um c Um C) co a) a) m m« ai 4 m w a) 5 w N O •U w NN L N 2CD Q) U O p L C N 0 O O p co c C a `CD C '0 0 N 0 C p a) 7 " j m N n O 2 C 7 `. 7 m n 0 2 .= C.N. C a) 7 N a) C .N+ CSS, C N m N m c) C. N C C.N.. m N 0 C N C wN, 00 co)(D C)ica O Ua) Eca O U '�j O co E2N C g 0 U a) V O co Ecu N C g Um C O C O C fU C Q 2 c 42 C O N C U a o m N C U E n w o �° m w C U n a ca n C 7 N U .�+ N a) O C C 7 C U N m O C C mE U O 7 C N N O C c Op E N U a) N W a) E mE spa) E 0 E if �E Np0 E 0 0" NOU o c p m E o N a) .- U E 0 o m a) a) E o O> 2 N O> > 0 2 N � N o 'O Mn 2 N O .�,0 0 D c p a) U C 'M1 'C CL -a) oc y 'm.O - U O C« •�9 n U U a) p C� d U U �� SO) -o Na) E E o o (D c: E w� c ° a)55v E :E 2 c c LD aj E wC�c fD E Cco o N O ` 7 2 U V >p 0'd 7 7 O n 7 7 7 C m 7 7 j O n C 7 0 7 7 .• C C UN 7 CNCU 0. C U U ^76 Z UM mCC haw ,3 0 E � N � rta t) > a) s L U N C ^ 5, ,O 7 O U .E C ,.�, wwu C N Z >° � N C N L C) 'a- O T] : C. C1 n 0 m w47, a1 O U 6).T'C..". a) m Ea fid'1 mmxa OX 41i O µC, E 7 1,1 s 1 c E E �, a) m a C N , E 0 Ea° ENo. a) n °2 O m n To N CJ 2 C a7 O wu "C7 C N "_cc0a) o m Na cs.o °c U m C R z, > O"' ak C 10 c E cJ o o c E aur" C'. O '") a C. 1= > ,ow O AY 7 qy} 0 "a0E V E. C1.. "C.7 �= m7.. a Col- arY as 41F "p Ga M > 0 "O 'D15 cF n E. > Ca In NNS a) .c'a m) c pJz ami aE. 0.0 OU C wd71 a — ,C 7 ^, in a7 O � 10 C'A esp a) > 7 i... O') C 2... E T O Y„ c cXD E rr E00No aY as ya 4a ,C S. O 2 .E L O KU C .O a) a) 0 ma a) 7 a101 .C:k N Q7 U a 1 U"F3, Cm7r ID ' 7 m u0 ° � 07. " O N as 0 E.IT ECS 0 u ca ar taa U [a. C OW) O &tY 0941 �a7 .d... 1', C. toy aped m � C a,1 M n C m v ''Km O 7U C aaoEen ^u CCm,monc0 N C 7 a) 43 N C5 ,aC ay m ,WC` U.. pry M a."%.. O E7 ur cot U nc 0 c data'5 cl a) U "1'�ac mws D.2 c r .? 70 0 a)o E U O c'I Ud Ca C C>8.0 0 O N y. a 7 wa u7 f ^[. f0 > 21717 0 CoT m C aHR 'a0 a.u C a7 IJ5 " N � .C7' 'wN'W CAd U O C C" m O"- 'ro^^ gU ."7"w', CCry'A Ctl G y'a 2 � C_ mp c ,2 nrro 0�r "E a) i a g m L C °a) C Ca U O 7 az a ) Clc;E•p E nu n N C A11.. O VY >E pc; c�r�cwwti 0E Z E� 2 v m 0 01 aL m p t7 C°r a) ti) '"ym• n C O O sr8 „k9.Y tl �a on cy tl7 a) 90 co 0 C 32 r3 0 aro N co :'. m W Gra 7 . wPb p y co "E°5�E�` E 0 &E p E as as `m r- a. E E m. M + .L.. ty ^ "L7 m-'' O O 7 m a) rir 4tip CLI c ^.._ a) oC-aaw Cd E sow 0 6 F °� ca t3) Q, ID �7 � m wa °' •o Z OJ a.a a OU ZU LU Oa LU 0 w0 F- aZ 00 Z Z 07 000 Z Y O a, oa Z H Q m 0 C O 2 c C O o u Y aci c_ E 'E O Q C E� N 7 N d C O 2 N C N E r - a) C CL a) N C O) C C f6 N d.c - cm UW C N m C C c fa a U a) a) w w O a) w a L) O U J 9 U p 0 '00^ O L N N O w 'p^ N 3 a) N a) 0 7 d C N O 0 C 7 d ,�, f6 N w 7 cm N C " 7 fa C C 1, co 'D a) a) L M y O N U C U N O U 0 O U C N O C �O O E N E f4 O C O U) 76 O a) Q C N a) 76 O f0 �F N Q w 0 �6 E 00 N O U U C S V 7 C t U C L) U N J F c` 0 C J E C p V a) �- aa)) 0. c° E o o ` a) 4-- 3 Qi t; a) L E 0 � 0 O O tR. N V C�' 7 •p C L 'NO `o = N O C °« P mae) C O N Q N Q.03 LM a03 0 LD N L 'al a) °) S> U .E � a)C> U N O 'Q a3 7 a)'7 a) 7 10 O C C U U C N C C U U W N a3 W L U_ N CL U % .:, Mi N moyj�m7s, as L � a) ) 0 Q L O N 7 Ew; N N N O N" a) >, co C O a) N O N ^ O L N 5 L .6 L 4) U ..+ C� x O N 0 �O L E V O a7 al N a) N C v 1a fn a) p E (D L N p O NV •� w C N .O � a) 'O s: U N E Q v o. a) _ O OP O N 2 E a) C U) N C E 11 0 3 U 0s�°�>'TLEW - .6 o co a) w 1,0 Cl) L) O N coo 0 N O) 43) C UI N c w a=iEa) '9(>u' E m�N3ac'C!L aw to N Np fa '-' C O 4i7 N O> 7 U N 0 7 O C) C=olCO y 0 Z U O)"aci a)x U0 3C a) a) E m fa m v! o > O °fU " ate) N 0 40 U C T N N U' y N D. y N y V N C N "G4Y,' Uy O O C 'o d a) '� E N 4 0" mU E Q co Ex cu r m a) C W L L U C U E O (D U) N' .0 7 O E 1U "> a) O W cl {a 0 COtpO L U as C > LLdi44,@��1 ' A a) E O Tri �L cu CU CD0. C EM CO dy C .Q C 00 . w o"a E M ea "0 ID C6 C > iJ,., �� O O 'f�1 0 > U N 0- C CL a) a) : U O T co O' O .2 Eo C � na°U � -O a) o D M� NC {A ) N is ea O tC N 1 ,'l 0) O C -0, Oco O L E 0 � 0 O O tR. 4 � (`9 al 0 C�' 7 m 00 7 O bac' a °(a as spa ° o�E L: a a .N ca x N L 'al a) as N a) N V N N Q °N Q O Q (U N LY A 0 U ` c m c U c z m z w z . ' aY O W C2 c ar�a9 Qm -R,r- �Y O a) io O IS O O' CO7 crib 0 r,c E LS N t J p CL'. L C .a4u r 7 0 V.X. c87 M, 6,'.. 0,' a) r iia w a) J i"a o O z C O U a) N LL 7 N d In- Z O< Wa CL v 0 — z �- F U W Oa W 0 w HZ01-- z Q Rr 0 Zz 00 Z Y O� �Q 0 z � J Q � m s N ar 7 N N "O N S 7 O C N 7 -0-6 E > aa) > U U C C L 0 30 N C N C t � a Ca CL - oca a) m m �cm c�CD O a C CD d C m W U W a :3 3 m U-5 O f`O >i . N `m N (T6 w .L.. N N �O O U V V N m o a o o"i o C: -j o C -@ m > C NO C 0 0 0 M3 c o o - C O.NU ts 0_N O '2 C N f2 O N N [0 N E2 O N C O L�O C C O c O d C 7 O O C E N > y N W p N O u N m a� o 2 xg1 L d t� (Dw N Y C C 47A N 7 .O d E 5 L N C AC.I µ6 E >ya (0 U O :)3 O f0 O U 4%O C O w Q -i O'7' mac„ oa m m c m! > &O o - = ul c5 c o( D C, c, Cc T(Dm 3acc 0 caEp a> c c�E o ca M z 0c•'"=c NMS CO ,O. ' f6 C N d O O tul .�.,yy ani IT mO CD N 0 N f6 . U C N W IOU C9Y a4ti. «.Y`a "C7 o O'"'C fA d m a d cm O O Q N """" ` N M SO 'A 9 d m d O. N LL N" 0 N N U) C 7 7+ d 0�'m L '� C O) N dd A C C {e 'm O• O n. F� O C'CF 'O U> 7>C ` ffl •0 -t N 7>>- N d N m 2 a f�0 rn ca�E_ O aa�mww = a� C c w '= >�o°� o m r? moo 5) o n� a ' m m �: z c m� ATTACHMENT #8 RESOLUTION 2015-099 --- ENVIRONMENTAL, IMPACT REPO R rl,, RESOLUTION NO. 2015-099 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED DOWNTOWN TRANSIT ORIENTED SPECIFIC PLAN AS ADEQUATE AND COMPLETE AND ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF FINDINGS OF FACT IN SUPPORT THEREOF, A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS AND MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (LOCATION: THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT AREA GENERALLY BOUNDED BY LA RICA AVENUE TO THE WEST, CLARK STREET TO THE NORTH, PARK N RIDE LOT TO THE EAST AND DOWNING AVENUE TO THE SOUTH, INCLUDING THE METROLINK RAIL STATION. APPLICANT: CITY OF BALDWIN PARK; CASE NUMBER: SPECIFIC PLAN 15-01 (SP 15-01). The CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby find, determine and declare as follows: a) An Initial Study was prepared for the proposed Project in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as amended, and the CEQA Guidelines. The City, as the Lead Agency, has determined, on the basis of the Initial Study, that the proposed Project will have a significant impact on the environment; and b) That pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, Public Resources Code, Section 21000 et. seq. (hereinafter "CEQA") and the CEQA Guidelines, 14 Cal; Adm. Code Section 15000 et. seq., and Environmental Impact report was prepared to evaluate anticipated environmental impacts resulting from changes in land use and land use policy a result of the implementation of the proposed Transit Oriented Downtown Specific Plan; and c) The Notice of Preparation (NOP) and Initial Study were publically circulated beginning December 31, 2014 and ending on February 5, 2015; and d) A public scoping meeting on the project was held on January 14, 2015; and e) The Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) was prepared and includes a discussion of those environmental issues obtained as part of the NOP and the public scoping meeting. The DEIR publically circulated for a 45 - day period, beginning on May 4, 2015, ending on June 22, 2015 as required by law; and Resolution 2015-099 Page 2 f) Upon completion of the 45 -day review period, responses to all comments on the environmental issues in the DEIR were prepared and incorporated into the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR); and g) The FEIR was forwarded to all individuals and entities commenting on the DEIR a minimum of ten (10) days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing; and h) A properly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Baldwin Park on October 27, 2015, at which time evidence was heard on the Final Environmental Impact Report; and i) The Planning Commission voted 5-0 recommending that the City Council approve the final environmental impact report and the Transit Oriented Specific plan for the City's Downtown area; and j) The City Council has fully reviewed and carefully considered the Final and Draft EIR and all other environmental documents that comprise the EIR, including all information presented at the duly noticed Public hearing upon said matter; and k) That the City Council has fully reviewed and carefully considered the Findings of Facts and Findings for the Environmental Impact Report, included and incorporated herein as Attachment #5 in the City Council staff report dated November 18, 2015, and in the Statement of Overriding Considerations for the Environmental Impact Report included and incorporated herein as Attachment #6 in the City Council staff report dated November 18, 2015; and 1) That the City Council has fully considered and recognized all the significant adverse environmental impacts which may result from the implementation of the proposed Downtown, Transit -Oriented Specific Plan; and m) That all adverse environmental impacts of the Project will be avoided or mitigated to a level of insignificance by the imposition of the Mitigation Monitoring program, included and incorporated herein as Attachment #7 in the City Council staff report dated November 18, 2015; and n) That the Environmental Impact Report has described all reasonable alternatives to the project that could feasibly contain the basic objectives of the Project, even when those alternatives might impede the attainment of Project objectives or might be more costly; and o) That the City Council hereby finds and determines that the unavoidable significant impacts of the Project that will not be reduced to a level of insignificance identified in the Environmental Impact Report, are clearly outweighed by the economical, social, and other benefits of the Project as set Resolution 2015-099 Page 3 for the in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, included at Attachment #6 in the City Council staff Report dated November 15, 2015; and p) That the City Council based upon the evidence presented and each City Council member being familiar with the Property, determined that the Final Environmental Impact Report should be certified. SECTION 2. That the City Council does hereby adopt the Findings of Fact for the Environmental Impact Report, included as Attachment #5 to the City Council staff report in the City Council staff report dated November 18, 2015. SECTION 3. That the City Council does hereby adopt the Statement of Overriding Considerations for the Environmental Impact Report, included at Attachment #6 in the City Council staff report dated November 18, 2015. SECTION 4. That, in view of the foregoing, the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park hereby certifies that the Environmental Impact Report for the Proposed Downtown Transit -Oriented Specific Plan is complete and adequate and was prepared in compliance with CEQA and was presented to the City Council and the Council has reviewed and considered the information contained herein. SECTION 5. That the City Council relied Upon the Administrative Record, and evidence presented at the public hearing making the above determinations and in reaching the conclusion that the Environmental Impact Report be certified. SECTION 6. That the Community Development Department/Planning Division is hereby authorized and directed to file a Notice of Determination with the County Clerk of Los Angeles, as required pursuant to CEQA. SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and forward a copy hereof to the Secretary of the Planning Commission. PASSED AND APPROVED this 18th day of November, 2015. MANUEL LOZANO MAYOR Resolution 2015-099 cte 4 ATTEST:. STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SS. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK I, KRISTI RUSSELL, Chief Deputy City Clerk, of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2015-099 was duly and regularly approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 18th day of November, 2015 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: KRISTI RUSSELL CHIEF DEPUTY CITY CLERK ATTACHMENT #9 RE SOLUTION 201.5-098 --- SCIFIC PLAN RESOLUTION 2015-098 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ADOPTING THE FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING A TRANSIT -ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT SPECIFIC PLAN FOR THE DOWNTOWN BALDWIN PARK AREA (LOCATION: THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT AREA GENERALLY BOUNDED BY LA RICA AVENUE TO THE WEST, CLARK STREET TO THE NORTH, PARK N RIDE LOT TO THE EAST AND DOWNING AVENUE TO THE SOUTH, INCLUDING THE METROLINK RAIL STATION. APPLICANT: CITY OF BALDWIN PARK; CASE NUMBER: SPECIFIC PLAN 15-01 (SP 15-01). THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby find, determine, and declare as follows: a) That an application ("Application") for a Specific Plan (SP 15-01) was submitted by the City for certain real property, within the area generally bounded by La Rica Avenue to the west, Clark Street to the North, Park n Ride Lot to the East and Downing Avenue to the South, including the Metrolink Rail Station in the City of Baldwin Park, described more particularly in the Application on file with the City Planner; and b) The Application is sought to allow for the orderly, systematic and specific implementation of the City's General Plan within the Specific Plan area (approximately 115 acres). At build -out, the development could include up to 833 residential dwelling units and 289,135 s.f. of nonresidential space; and c) That a duly noticed public hearing was held on said Application by the Planning Commission, and based upon evidence presented including applicable staff report for the Specific Plan and each member of the Commission being familiar with the general area, it was determined that the facts as required by the Baldwin Park Municipal Code for the granting of such Application is present and that the Planning Commission should recommend that the City Council approve the Specific Plan; and d) A properly noticed public hearing was held by the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park on November 18, 2015, at which time evidence was heard on the Downtown Transit -Oriented Specific Plan; and Resolution 2015-098 Page 2 SECTION 2. The City Council does hereby adopt the Findings of Fact applicable to Specific Plans: a) The specific plan is consistent with and provides for the orderly, systematic and specific implementation of the General Plan. The specific plan will provide for the orderly, systematic and specific implementation of the General Plan within the Specific Plan area (approximately 115 acres overall). The Specific Plan identifies sites that are underutilized and have the potential for redevelopment, infill development and/or adaptive reuse to better serve the downtown area. The proposed Specific Plan includes development standards to facilitate a cohesive design and a high-quality architectural and pedestrian -oriented environment through a continuous street -frontage, pedestrian connections and ground -floor design features that provide a visual link to the street and sidewalk. Build -out of the Specific Plan would result in the development of 833 residential units and 289,135 s.f. of non-residential space. The specific plan is located within the Downtown Area noted in Goal 8.0 of the Land Use Element of the General Plan which seeks to establish a pedestrian "core" for the Downtown Area. Additionally, Policy 8.1 encourages the City to provide a mix of commercial and multi -family residential uses to create 24-hour activity in the Downtown, which is exactly what the Specific Plan facilitates to create within the area. b) The land use and development regulations within the specific plan are comparable in breadth and depth to regulations contained in this chapter. The proposed development standards contained in the specific plan do vary some from the development standards contained in the City's Municipal Code; however there is a reduction in the number of parking stalls required for commercial uses (75% of the current Zoning Code requirement) and residential multi -family uses. This reduction is to reflect the characteristics of a Downtown transit oriented development and to reflect on the `Park Once" concept. Furthermore, the reduction in the development standards for on-site parking is justified in that the project proposal is transit -oriented given its close proximity and walking distance to the Baldwin Park Metrolink Rail Station, the MTA rapid bus route along Ramona Boulevard, which feeds into the EI Monte Bus Station, as well as Foothill Transit bus routes which serve the San Gabriel Valley. Transit -oriented development typically Resolution 2015-098 Page 3 requires fewer parking than regular development due to its location near transit hubs and proximity to goods and services. This reduces the likelihood that residents to have two automobiles per unit and instead residents will rely on public transit and other alternative modes of transportation. c) The specific plan will not adversely affect the public health and safety or result in incompatible land uses. This specific plan is consistent with Goal 8.0 of the Land Use Element of the General plan which seeks to establish a pedestrian `Core' for the Downtown as noted with the transit - oriented, mixed use development including up to a maximum 833 residential dwelling units and the 289,135 s.f. of commercial/retail space. The specific plan is also consistent with Policy 8.1 which is to provide for a mix of commercial and multi -family residential uses ... and allows mixed use development to consist of vertical integration of commercial and residential uses as shown in the attached Specific Plan. d) The specific plan provides the framework to phase and pace growth within the specific plan area so as to ensure completion of all necessary public facilities concurrently with completion of development entailed in the specific plan. The specific plan is not specifically phased; however, it is considered a long-range document. Much of the revitalization in the Specific Plan area will require land assemblage and on sites with multiple owners, redevelopment tends to be longer term (10+ years). It is anticipated that the any proposed development within the Specific Plan area will be coordinated in accordance with the Specific Plan's development standards and design guidelines. e) The specific plan identifies adequate financing mechanisms for the infrastructure and public facilities required to support the development. There are no financing mechanisms noted in the specific plan and financing of the infrastructure of any type of new development within the Specific Plan area will be completely borne by the respective Developer. Any developer who decides to undertake any development within the Specific Plan area will be required to coordinate with each respective utility company with regards to upgrading/installing infrastructure. However, the Specific Plan notes that the Resolution 2015-098 Paae 4 City should develop an infrastructure financing plan as outlined in Chapter 8. Because individual areas of the Specific Plan may develop at different times, and it is anticipated that the infrastructure and available funding sources will change as development occurs, the financing plan will need to be updated periodically. SECTION 3. That the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2015-099 certifying the Final and Draft Environmental Impact Report and adopting the Finding of Fact, Statement of Overriding Considerations and the Mitigation Monitoring Program pursuant to CEQA. SECTION 4. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and forward a copy hereof to the City Planner. PASSED AND APPROVED this 18th day of November, 2015. MANUEL LOZANO MAYOR ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) SS. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ) I, KRISTI RUSSELL, Chief Deputy City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution 2015-098 was duly and regularly approved and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 18t day of November, 2015 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:. NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: KRISTI RUSSELL, CHIEF DEPUTY CITY CLERK ITEM NO. STAFF RPP R, � � }IUB"0F le 4 IH TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council I FROM: Manuel Carrillo, Jr., Director of Recreation & Community Services DATE: November 18, 2015 SUBJECT: REVIEW OF CURRENT APPLICATIONS AND CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENT OF STUDENT MEMBERS OF RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION SUMMARY This report requests City Council review the submitted Student Commission application(s) and appoint the qualified individual(s) to serve on the Recreation and Community Services Commission to fill the current vacancies. FISCAL IMPACT Student Commissioners serving on the Recreation and Community Services Commission receive a stipend of $50 for each Commission meeting attended. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Council review the submitted Student Commission application(s), accept nomination(s), appoint the selected individual(s) to the Parks and Community Services Commission and adopt Resolution No. 2015-090, entitled, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park Appointing Qualified Students From Three Baldwin Park High Schools To The Recreation & Community Services Commission Of The City Of Baldwin Park To Office Numbers 6, 7 And 8." LEGAL REVIEW This report and the associated Resolution has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney as to legal form and content. BACKGROUND Pursuant to Chapter 32 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code and in response to the vacant seats, Office Nos. 6, 7 and 8, of the Parks and Community Services Commission, staff advertised seeking applications from students of Sierra Vista High School, Baldwin Park High School and North Park High School, wishing to serve on a City's Recreation and Community Services Commission. The color advertisement was posted at City Hall, Julia McNeill Senior Center, Esther Snyder Community Center, Baldwin Park Library and Baldwin Park Arts & Recreation Center, as well as an interactive banner on the City website. Attached hereto are the Student Commissioner applications for the Recreation and Community Services Commission, Office Nos. 6, 7 and 8. ALTERNATIVE Council may choose to reject all applicants and re -advertise the open seats or may choose to not fill the any or all of the open seats. ATTACHMENTS 41 — Summary of Applicants from Sierra Vista, Baldwin Park and North Park High Schools #2 — Resolution No. 2015-090 #3 — Applications from students of Sierra Vista, Baldwin Park and North Park High Schools SUMMARY OF STUDENT APPLICANTS BALDWIN PARK PARKS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION SELECT ONE FROM EACH SCHOOL: dill^"'RR "VISTA HI("41-50 1001, Luz E :G"ylcl�mado a A e17 __........w. Highlights: Top Scholar; Member of Five School Clubs; Catechist Assistant, Volunteer Tutor at Math Center; and Rose Parade Volunteer. Carla, Cmfillo A c 17' Highlights: Honor Roll Student; President of IDEAS Club; Member of Philosophy Club, Speech and Debate Club and Spanish Club. BALDWIN PARK UJKYH SCHOOL, Madeline Gutierrez - Me 17 Highlights: Cumulative GPA of 3.97; enrolled in several college prep courses; member of five school clubs; volunteers with Rose Parade, Box for Troops, and Run or Dye Care Packaging; recipient of Principal's Award, Achievement Award and Brave Scholar Award. arliITl"atllIz.__. 17 Highlights: Cumulative GPA of 4.3; enrolled in advanced placement courses; Editor of Key Club Bulletin and current Key Club Treasurer; Member of National Honor Society and California Scholarship Federation; recipient of the Brave Distinguished Scholar Award three years running. NORTH PARK, 111G]"i SCHOOL nthony Grij�alva _ w F 17 Highlights: Excellent student who is on track for early graduation; excellent attendance record; intelligent and well spoken; highly recommended by Mr. James Orick, North Park Student Counselor RESOLUTION NO. 2015-090 BALDWIN PARK PARKS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION APPOINTMENT OF STUDENT COMMISSIONERS RESOLUTION NO. 2015-090 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK APPOINTING QUALIFIED STUDENTS FROM THREE BALDWIN PARK HIGH SCHOOLS TO THE RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK TO OFFICE NUMBERS 6, 7 AND 8. WHEREAS, the Recreation & Community Services Commission consists of eight (8) members and Office Numbers 1 through 5 are appointed for a two-year term and members of Office Number 6 through 8 (Student Commissioners) are appointed for a one-year period; and WHEREAS, A Notice of Vacancies on the Recreation and Community Services Commission was posted at the following locations: City Hall, Esther Snyder Senior Center, Morgan Park Community Center, Baldwin Park Public Library, Baldwin Park Arts & Recreation Center and on the City of Baldwin Park website, and the City Clerk's Office accepted applications from the date of advertisement through August 12, 2015; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to fill Office Numbers 6, 7 and 8 with qualified students from Sierra Vista High School, Baldwin Park High School and North Park High School; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. On May 21, 2014, City Council approved Resolution No. 2014-015, which appointed persons to the Recreation & Community Services Commission Office Numbers 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, with terms expiring on June 30, 2016. The appointment of student commissioners, in office numbers 6, 7 and 8, are permitted to serve a period of one year, with the term expiration date of June 30, 2016. Section 2. With the advertisement of the existing vacancies, applications were received and presented to the City Council for consideration to appoint one student from each high school to the Recreation & Community Services Commission as Student Commissioners serving in Office Numbers 6, 7 and 8. Such appointees shall hold office at the pleasure of the City Council and serve for the term as follows: OFFICE NUMBER COMMISSIONER TERM ENDING 1 ........ Joann Watkin s incumbent) June 30, 20 � 16 2 Saul Barrientos June 30, 2016 elia Avila (incumbent) June 30, 2016 Ana Lu an n c..u. mbent) mJune , 2016 5 4 Leslie Bnto (incumbenQ1111111111-111",_ June.130, 2016 .3...0. ----- 6 Sierra Vista H. S. Student June 30, 2016 7 Baldwin Park H. S. Student June 30, 2016 8 North Park H. S. Student June 30, 2016 Resolution No. 2015-090 Page 2 Section 3. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and forward a copy to this resolution to all appointees and to the Recreation and Community Services Commission Secretary PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 18th day of November, 2015. MANUELLOZANO MAYOR ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ss. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK I, ALEJANDRA AVILA, City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution 2015-090 was duly and regularly approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park at a regular meeting of the City Council held on November 18, 2015, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ALEJANDRA AVILA, CITY CLERK STUDENT APPLICATIONS BALDWIN PARK PARKS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION CITY OF BALDWIN PARK RECREATION I COMMUNITY SERVICES STUDENT COMMISSION INFORMATION FORM Name of High' chool PERSONAL INFORMATION: To be completed by Student) Name - Residence Address,,---.— —J. Age: Date of Birth: Social Security # Message Phone Home Phone No.-(— E -Mail address:— Grade: Name of Parent(s) or Guardian(s)—j- Student lives with: (Both Parents [ I Mother [ ] Father I I Guardian Person to call In case of 61 Phone No.:. Appointment Datc,: ] Recreation Director Student's 6attire fe ParentdGuar i r Sig tOre RECEIVED MAR 2 3 2015 CITY OF BALDWIN PARK CITY CLERKS DEPARTMENT Student's iJa�r�e� .... ti n . a �, ' r C 0 Graduating Class of, Name of Schooq,,,,_�U Home Address— Home Phone Note to Principal: Please provide a written letter of recommendation for the above named student, Date;... _ m _ .� _ .._�.._...m Principal's a-.-uW- p I s Signature March 20, 2015 "Horne of the Dons" 3600 North Frazier Street - Baldwin Park, CA 91706 (626)960-7741 - Fax(626)856-4050 To Whom It May Concern, Jackie White Principal Alma Canal Assistant Principal Eric Lopez Assistant Principal Claudia Salazar Interim Assistant Principal Doug Watt ASB Director it is a pleasure to writc, this letter of recoinniendation for Ms. Luz, Mercado. Currently, Litz is the top 11'h grade student at Sierra Vista Iligh School, In additionto being atop scholar, Luz is highly involved ill a variety of activities which indicate leer leaders[iij) and organizational skills. She has been all officer in rive clubs oil camptis, including our IDEAS club, which is dedicated to helping undocinriented students obtain entrance to college and access to financial aid. ('.1ornmunity involvement and assisting others have been consistent themes in 1.1uz' academic career. She serves in the church as a catecIiist assistant, helps with local charities, volunteers as a tutor in tile school math center, and even helps decorate floats for the Rose Parade. Litz has my most enthusiastic recommendation to be a Recreation/Community Services Student Commissioner for the City of Baldwin Park, Sincerely, c -T4 .. White Principal BALDWIN PARK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 8181" Will a filgh Soho at Is "Mifted tomo policy mot all P loplo shall have 0 Kull accost to programs sawl U91119t twilhout repord to age, color. alsed, naval at or ethnic 0 dgim lienillesp, lots, folioN " or pander. PLEASE PRIN I kkS0Q _N4�_F0RP Nance—L _Qr CITY OF BALDWIN PARK RECREATION / COMMUNITY SERVICES STUDENT COMMISSION INFORMATION FORM Name of High S(hoot �D TION: [To be completed by Student) N (Ij (� S+ i 1 (0 Residence Age:. Date of . ..... Social Security Home Phone No.lw, Message Phone No. Grade:. � 2 - Name of Parent(s) or Gu Student lives with: [ 4 Both Parents t ] Mother I I , e Person to call in c e of ewer' e, ca /�K Phone No,, rnuGr�l7_�15 Date Appointment Date'. -- Re -Appointment J)ate: . . ...... . . _ .... ...... cc; Personnel Department Graduation Year:_20._15,._.__..__ [ ] Father [ ] Guardian Student's Signature rc C t/G Iua an' t/ re �@ Signalbrd [ ] Recreation Director [ ] Recreation Secretary Student's Name Name of Set, Home Addre Home Phon Graduating Class of 201-5 - IM Note to Principal: Please provide a written letter of recommendation for the above named -student. e,A C��IGIe_GtJ Date: lb rine I's Signature I It School t.w_.� w cSierra Tista 2lig P 4,S% 11116ine of the Dons" 3600 North Frazier Street - Baldwin Park, CA 91706 (626)960-7741 Fax(626)856-4050 0, City Of Baldwin Park January 12, 2015 Dear Sir or Madam: Jackie Wliite Principal Alina Canal Assistant Principal Eric Lopez Assistant Principal Estlier G. Villegas Assistant Principal It's a great pleasure to write this letter of recommendation for Miss Carla Castillo as she pursues a position as Park Commissioner for the City of Baldwin Park,. I have known Carla during her four years of high school, and she is a great candidate for this position. Carla Is an outstanding student who is Involved In a great many activities, She Is president of our IDEAS Club, which works to assist undocumented students to go to college. She has, organized, coordinated and implemented workshops and fundraisers for this club as well as the p1jilosol)[1y Club, the Speech and, Debate Club, and the Spanish Club. Carla Is an Honor Roll student who does not let her busy schedule Interfere with her Studies, and she is highly respected by her teachers. She is fluent In English and Spanish, which makes her an asset, to any comil-lunity position in our city. She Is kind, personable and trustworthy, Community involvement is not new to Carl& in addition to being a true community servant In her school, Carla has worked with younger students at the East Valley Boys' and Girls' Club in their after-school program and has Volunteered at the Baldwin Park Teen Center. Carla is familiar with the parks of Baldwin Park and knows her community well, Miss Carla Castillo has my most enthusiastic endorsement for a Parks and Recreation Commissioner, Please contaot me if you need further information. Respectfully, al A. White BALDWIN PARK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT . . ....... . . sierra WIF14 MAW DOI Is coillinkled to the PC ROY that all PaoPleali all h6a viiu It acdBitlo 6rograni I and fgC111tisswitbout to paid to go I, color. old ad. Nation It or 8111111C 00111.11 a fidlomp,raca,18119lon of Curler. RECEIVED LIAR 12 1015 CITY OF BALDWIN PARK CITY OF 13ALCIWIN PARK RECREATION 1 COMMUNITY SERVICES CITY CLERKS OVARTMENT STUDENT COMMISSION INFORMATION FORM Name of High School rr.. A C rnuv i __ ,,._ —.- _ .... ............ _ PERSONAL INFORMATION [To be completed by Student) Name;-_.���_....-. ....._�. ........_.. — _.��. Residence Address Age: L._ Social Security A ....�,., Date of Blrth:.�.�...�m--�.--�_�.. . Home Phone No.__. Message Phone E-mail address: ' . co M ...._ .� tH Grade: Graduation Year. ...... m..,� � � ....... �.. Name of Parent(s) or Guardian(;)_ t 1 Y `Y �••- �C t- •••••— Student lives with: [ V] Both Parents [ I Mother [ I Father [ ] Guardian Person to call in case of emergenoy:,__. [oa' Phone bale Appointment Date:—...— Re-Appointment ate:..mRe-Appointment Date:_ „ __........ ... cc: [ ] Personnel Department §t Signature Parent/G7 rdian Signature [ ] Recreation Director [ ] Recreation Secretary 3900 North Puente Avenve Anthony M. Ippolito, Principal Baldwin Park, CA 91706 Jose Cuevas, Assistant Principal Phone: (626) 960-5431 Gayle Morganstern, Assistant Principal Fax- (626) 856-4069 Fred Swift, Assistant Principal www.bpbroves.net Holly Farrell, ASB Director March 12, 2015 City of Baldwin Park 4100 Baldwin Park Boulevard Baldwin Park, CA 91706 Deal- City Council Members: It is with enthusiasm to submit this letter of reference for Ms. Madeline Gutierrez who is applying for the position of Student Commissioner with tile City of Baldwin Park. Presently, Madeline is in her jtinior year at Baldwin Park High School. I have had the pleasure of knowing Madeline for tile lost 3 years in my role as Principal tit Baldwin Park High School, It is 111Y pleasure to share with you the accomplishments of Ms. Madeline Gutierrez. Madeline is a high perrorniing student who maintains a rigorous academic schedtfle. Site is kill active participant in numerous school chubs and organizations and also gives tillie to her community,, Oil an academic level, Madelitic maintains a 3.97 cumulative GPA. She is enrolled in several college prep courses, Madeline is a member in various clubs and organizations- AVID Club, Key Club, Adelante Club, and she is a nieniberof the Hippocrates Circle. Further, Madeline's volunteer experience includes: Rose Float decorating, Box for Troops, Run or Dye, care packaging, Christmas gift wrapping, and volunteers in the community Food Drive. Furthermore, Madeline is bilingual in English and Spanish, a quality that is beneficial for our community. Notably, Madeline is the, recipient of several awards. She was the recipient of the distinguished Principal's Award, Achieventent Award, and Brave Scholar Award, It is illy pleasure to recommend Ms, Madeline Gutierrez, for your consideration as a viable candidate for the position of Stu(jent Collunissioner for the City of 11aldwin Park, Madeline is personable, intelligent, and a responsible young, lady with excellent leadership qualities. If chosen, she will undoubtedly serve the community with pride. Sincerely, h' io 0 PH le Mr A lilloqpy I Baldwin Par Hid i School (626) 960-5431 ext. 3105 (626) 705-7288 (work cell) RECEIVED IPI.. ATTACH CITY OF BALDWIN PARK FEB; �- 2 YOi ;LII I N 4 PY .F APPLICATION FOR CITY COMMISSION CITY 6FtfEtltif*111Nf�A,RK � , LOT�I I f Y SI , N And Ci t`y' #4 9PARTMI;INT . A GOPOF'�OU P k� - N STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS _ APPLICATION IS FOR THE FOLLOWING COMMISSION: 5+y6eA+ Coyle" ... e► . trii5S t 0►�t each craµrtlfrfissNoft _..,__... .._. — .. .....-. ...... . _ (7i s atafo �t ri�P fion rs I t° d for,each m... ._.... PERSONAL, INFORMATION: Name lnE �I'.S �.If'X���...�__.�.._ Residence Addressor 6..1[L/1aYk �_�.�.`1!.. _e --------- Length .-_--- Length of time at this Address: IS Vves. E-mail address:^ t� ...._.-. --•– Home Phone No..q/A,,.___.._ Cell/Message Phone No... (Am Are you 18 years of age or older? _ i\i Are you registered to vote in the City of Baldwin Park? _,,,m NO,.__._ .......... .___ ............. y agency p �.......�.�...�.. .. �...��..._ n Park? y If es, name of s enc and osippoin ., d Y d and/or agency within the City of BaldW Do you current/ serve as an elected or appointed official for an boarmmmW EDUCATION: Circle Highest grade you completed: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 (911 12 High School Graduate? StOUP G.E.D.` _ s ,., ,..— EMPLOYMENT INFORMATION f EXPERIENCE: REFERENCES: Please provide the names of two (@) persons, who are not City of Baldwin Park Elected or Appointed Officials and who can comment on your capabilities and character. IMPORTANT: Read the following carefully and answer completely. A conviction is not an automatic bar to appointment. Each case is considered on its individual mrmarltsd HAVE. YOU LIVER BEEN CONVICTED OF A FELONY OR MISDEMEANOR OTHER THAN A MINOR TRAFFIC VIOLATION? If yes,, Pleaso fist all offenses, date and place of offenso(s), and sentence/fine received: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTICERTIFICATION: understand that upon filing, this applicratlon becones a public record/ I certify under penally of perjury under the laws of the State of Caafif*rnia that 11`10 forogoing Is true and correct. pate Signature Voter Re�istmalion Veriiication: ❑ �..�....� _.:°° Residency verification: El Yes El No No Date: ........ g Yes ❑ No Residency verification: ❑ Yes ❑ No Date: m ..... _ Appointment date:.-- ....._ •, ------ --- .... Residency verification: ❑ Yes ❑ No Datc: Terme taaam n _ .m ... " Commission Requested _e_.Wpr..,r -r�1 o NT 0tl t li IC S It l l : Use this space to list your goals and objectives and why you feel you should be appointed to the commission for which you are applying. Rease include any additional information you fent will be beneficial to the Council in consideration of your appointment to this commission. r &A ... ;. Q'_fft;'6 rid 47 Date Da 0e) IS_.. Notice: Please be advised that you and your qualifications may be discussed by the City Council at an open meeting. This Application and Statement of Qrralificatiorr will be kopt on filo for two () years, During this time, should a vacancy occur in the coraamissiora for which you have requested consideration of alapolntn7e17t, your application will be Included in the pool of applicants providdd however, that you submit current proof of residerrray at the tlnae of said recroitment, Failure to provido curront proof of residency With each rocruitment will invalid0ld this application. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK RECREATION / COMMUNITY SERVICES STUDENT COMMISSION INFORMATION FOR RECEIVED MAR 12 2015 CITY OF BALDWIN PARK CITY CLERKS DEPARTMENT PM50NAL *WGfU A'ilM-.ITo be complelodby studerA) J "Lo Ago; f>aw of B+rtit. ,.,.,�,,�,., �.►�„�. � Soda] 8— Horne Phone No MassMe Phone No E-msif rtroa�..w,,�� C L ©inn !talisrrrtitaunyew: `. Name of PbrenKs) or r e rdimits . � s� , Saudent lives with: �j Both Parents t 1 Mother [ I Father I ] Guardian Person iv cafE to case of►aan eo � � �° � Phone NN+ .l a Appointment INte; Comments: ten, to"Gian �_.&,.... co: [ ] Personnel )3qw3rtmcjt [ j Recreation D'nwWr -[ , ] n Secrtry Baiciwin rarK, .,A y i / uo Phone, (626) 960-5431 Holly Farrell, ASB Director Fax.- (626) 856-4069 www,bpbroves.net February 13, 2013 City of Baldwin Park 4 100 Baldwin Park Boulevard Baldwin Park, CA 91706 Deal- City Council Members: It is with enthusiasm to submit this letter of reference for Ms. Yareli Martinez who is applying for the position of Student Coj'nillissiolici•Nvitiltllc(','ityof,*Mildwitillark- Presently, Yareli is in her junior year° at Baldwins Park I ligh School., 1, have had the pleasure of knowing Yarcli, for the last 3 year in my role as Principal at Batdwin Park High Sellool. It is Illy P1011SLIN to share -,vi(b you the, accomplishments of Ms, Yareli Martinez. Yarcli is a high performing student who maintains a rigorous academic scherhjle. She is all active participant in 111,111crous school clubs and organizations and also gives tinic to her community, Oil an acadeinic level, Yareli maintains a 43 cumulative GPA. She is enrolled mostly ill advanced placernent courses, Yareli is a member in various clubs and organizations: AVID Club, California Scholarship Ircderation (CSF), National Honor Society, W6 Culture C1111,), she is the editor of the1rey Club Bulletin, and is the current Key Club'rroasurer. Further, Yareli act ively volurratecr's at her a laura`r la, Morgan Dark, uararl rat the Ilalrlrvira Parlr „I cess (::,enter„ Site wars the MAPS College Fair organizer, and volunteers as ft rnath tutor at Baldwin Park High School. Furthermore, Yareli is bilingual in English and Spanish, a quality that is beneficial for our community. Notably, Yareli is the recipient of several awards. She was the recipient of the Brave Distinguished Scholar Award in 2012, 2013, and 2014. In addition, she was awarded the AVID Excellence Award in 2014, and was ranked in, (lie top five of her class in the 2014. It is my pleasure to recommend Ms. Yareli Martinez, for Your consideration as a viable candidate for the Position of Student Commissioner for tile City ofBaldwin Park. Yareli is personable, jljtcJjigent, and a responsible young lady with excellent leadership qualities. If chosen, she will undoubtedly serve the conitnunity with pride. (626) 960-5431 ext. 3105 (626) 705-7288 (work cell) RECEIVED PLEASE ATTACH ` CITY OF BALDWIN PARK RNL N APPLICATION FOR CITY COMMISSION ��") FgAI ki Ad CITY OF BALDWIN PARK 'OIIR,, CITY CLERKS DEPARTMENT PHOf6 ICS _ STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS MISSION:.- 3 IS FOR THE FOLLOWING COerlrtl#safort Priv t _--_A A as APPLICATION ara[ a fi tf/ort Ts r ey for.eac e ..... ... � ..._.... PERSONAL INFORMATION: Name - Residence Address_ arneResidenceAddress_ �..�-f" ��, � -•� ��..�m.���..�...�r�..... Length of time at this Address: E-mail address:.- - Home Phone Pio. ... _ Cell/Message Phone No.. _ ,Z,0> Are you 18 years of age or older? „ �,` Are you registered to vote in the City of Baldwin Park?__JN o !V_4�.,.�._...,..�. Do you currently serve as all elected or appointed official for any board and/or agency within the City of Baldwin Park? i� o f yes, name of gency and Circle HighestI ON: rade you completed: p1 s2I 3 .d 5 6 7 8 9 1,, �...m, _...,._ E.D, EDUCATION: g Y 0 11)12 High School Graduate? ._ _ G.E.D.? EMPLOYMENT INFORMATION 1 EXPERIENCE: REFERENCES: Please provide the names of two (@) persons, who are not City of Baldwin Park Elected or Appointed Officials and who can comment on your capabilities and character. IMPORTANT: Read the following carefully and answer completely. A conviction Is not an automatic bar to appointment. Each case is considered on Its individual merits. HAVE YOU EVER BEEN CONVICTED OF A FELONY OR MISDEMEANOR OTHER THAN A MINOR TRAFFIC VIOLATION? � If yes, Please list all offenses, data and place of offer)o(s), and sentence/fine received: Z- � — ``_ Date Residency verification: ❑ Yes Residency verification: ❑ Yes verification: ❑ Yes ACKNOWLEDGEMENT/CERTIFICATION: I understand that upon filing, this application becornes a public rrIcord. I cortlfy underponalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Cal4orniar that the forogoing Is trace and correct. Sig ❑ No ❑ No ❑ No Date: re Voter Registration Verification: ❑ Yes ❑ No Appointment date: ....m. Term exoiws: I � - mbvjl ` CITY OF BALDWIN PARK RECREATION / COMMUNITY SERVICES STUDENT COMMISSION INFORMATION FORM Name of High School PFERSONAL INFORMATION: [To be completed by Student) Residence Addrss_ Age:._ ,�.� Date of Birth:= -_ ... ._ _ Social Security # Home Phone No. � Message Phone No.�r E-mail address:—�.� ©.� Graduation Fear:, Grade: °�-w.......��.....-. Name of Parent(s) or Guardians) ,,. a .. 9 o � Student lives with: [ ] Both Parents ( ] Mother [Father ( ] Guardian Person to call in case of emergency.~ 1' PhoneNo !.. , _~~._~...~ _ ..~,.... — -.�._....._. .�.~�....�_ M Appointment Re -Appointment cc. [ ] Personnel Department [ ] Recreation Director [ ] Recreation Secretary North Park High School Vince Pratt, Principal Clara Evans, Assistant Principal Continuation and Alternative Education Programs 4600 North Bogart Avenue, Baldwin Park, California 91706 Phone: (626) 3374407 Fax: (626) 856-4402 To Whom It May Concern, Anthony Grijalva, , was transferred to North Park High School during the 2014-2015 school year. That was his Junior year and I am pleased to confirm he is on track to graduate wifly as a Senior. 1 --le passed both parts of the California High School Exit Examfiltition and a has a North Park GPA of 2.00. Anthony came to our school after spending grades 9-10 at Baldwin Park High School. It is my pleasure to say the transfer was a success! He has not only accelerated his credit completion rate but he has maintained an excellent attendance record while at North Park. This is a dramatic difference from when Anthony was referred to the local charter school before arriving at North Park. Anthony has a strong desire to follow a career in the music industry. He is now thinking about the future, his graduation and his career in the field he loves. Based on my experiences with Anthony I can confirm he is a dedicated student who has matured at North Park and has learned from the mistakes of the past. He is an intelligent and well spoken young man who would be an asset to any organiztion. Please give him every consideration when consdering him for the student representative postilion.. I have attached an copy of his transcript. Please feel free to contact me with any further questions. Sincerely, James , 0 k 1 North Park Counseling (626) 856-4494 (jworick942@bpusd.net) SUMMARY OF STUDENT APPLICANTS BALDWIN PARK PARKS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION SELECT ONE FROM EACH SCHOOL: Uiz E, ITl' ew c.Vado - 7 Highlights: Top Scholar; Member of Five School Clubs; Catechist Assistant, Volunteer Tutor at Math Center; and Rose Parade Volunteer. Carla Castillo- Ave 17 Highlights: Honor Roll Student; President of IDEAS Club; Member of Philosophy Club, Speech and Debate Club and Spanish Club. Madeline Gutierrez Ave 17 Highlights: Cumulative GPA of 3.97; enrolled in several college prep courses; member of five school clubs; volunteers with Rose Parade, Box for Troops, and Run or Dye Care Packaging; recipient of Principal's Award, Achievement Award and Brave Scholar Award. _Yarli 1rtfi... - _A991-7 Highlights: Cumulative GPA of 4.3; enrolled in advanced placement courses; Editor of Key Club Bulletin and current Key Club Treasurer; Member of National Honor Society and California Scholarship Federation; recipient of the Brave Distinguished Scholar Award three years running. O I_I 11'ARK I -I IGIII SCI 1001., AnthonyGri'alva - Awe 17 Highlights: Excellent student who is on track for early graduation; excellent attendance record; intelligent and well spoken; highly recommended by Mr. James Orick, North Park Student Counselor A r UTACHMEN r RESOLUTION NO. 2015-090 BALDWIN PARK PARKS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION APPOINTMENT OF STUDENT COMMISSIONERS RESOLUTION NO. 2015-090 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK APPOINTING QUALIFIED STUDENTS FROM THREE BALDWIN PARK HIGH SCHOOLS TO THE RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK TO OFFICE NUMBERS 6, 7 AND 8. WHEREAS, the Recreation & Community Services Commission consists of eight (8) members and Office Numbers 1 through 5 are appointed for a two-year term and members of Office Number 6 through 8 (Student Commissioners) are appointed for a one-year period; and WHEREAS, A Notice of Vacancies on the Recreation and Community Services Commission was posted at the following locations: City Hall, Esther Snyder Senior Center, Morgan Park Community Center, Baldwin Park Public Library, Baldwin Park Arts & Recreation Center and on the City of Baldwin Park website, and the City Clerk's Office accepted applications from the date of advertisement through August 12, 2015; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to fill Office Numbers 6, 7 and 8 with qualified students from Sierra Vista High School, Baldwin Park High School and North Park High School; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. On May 21, 2014, City Council approved Resolution No. 2014-015, which appointed persons to the Recreation & Community Services Commission Office Numbers 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, with terms expiring on June 30, 2016. The appointment of student commissioners, in office numbers 6, 7 and 8, are permitted to serve a period of one year, with the term expiration date of June 30, 2016. Section 2. With the advertisement of the existing vacancies, applications were received and presented to the City Council for consideration to appoint one student from each high school to the Recreation & Community Services Commission as Student Commissioners serving in Office Numbers 6, 7 and 8. Such appointees shall hold office at the pleasure of the City Council and serve for the term as follows: Resolution No. 2015-090 Page 2 Section 3. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and forward a copy to this resolution to all appointees and to the Recreation and Community Services Commission Secretary PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 18th day of November, 2015. MANUELLOZANO MAYOR ATTEST., STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ss. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK I 1, ALEJANDRA AVILA, City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution 2015-0910 was, duly and regularly approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park at a regular meeting of the City Council held on November 18, 2015, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ALEJANDRA AVILA, CITY CLERK STUDENT APPLICATIONS BALDWIN PARK PARKS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION CITY OF BALDWIN PARK RECEIVED RECREATION / COMMUNITY SERVICES STUDENT COMMISSION INFORMATION FORM MAR 2 3 2015 CITY OF BALDWIN PARK a6( . ""') 3JI–IlLv�CITY CLERKS DEPARTMENT __ - A— Name of High chool n F.1 -r PERSONAL INFORMATION: [To be completed by Student) Name-J"V Residence Age. Date of Birth: Home Phone No,,,,( 4t,"_)dL) Message Phone No. _6 E-mail address: _e, . k id..' _- _1_1_.._.-_._.'_.— Grade: 'aL Year Name of Parent(s) or Guardian(s)—JI Student lives With: ( Vf Both Parents [ ] Mother [ I Father [ ] Guardian Person to call In case of emergency:, Phone No.: Student'sOgnature Parenl)Guarci'Ir Si pia t�rro Student's Nome Name of Schco� IL, '24(, "j, of,) Graduating Class of 2V 16. Ja Home Address— -Meal, 11 -9 - Home Phone, Note to Principal: Please provide awritten letter ufrecommendation for the above named student. Principal's Signature March 20, 2015 6icrra Tista 2,"gh cSchool "Hoene of the Dons" 3600 North Frazier Street • Baldwin Park, CA 91706 To Whom It May Concern, (626) 960-7741 - Pax (626) SS6-40S0 Jackie White Principal Alma Canal Assistant Principal Eric Lopez Assistant Principal Claudia Salazar Interim Assistant Principal Doug Watt ASB Director It is a pleasure to write this letter of recommendation for Ms, Luz Mercado. Currently, Luz is the top 11th grade student at Sierra Vista High School. In addition to being a top scholar, Luz is highly involved in a variety of activities which indicate her leadership and organizational skills. She has becit an officer in, live clubs on campus, inellwdin,g our ID1IAS 01111), which is dedicated to helping undocumented students obtain entrance to college and access to financial aid. Community involvement and assisting others have been consistent themes in Luz' academic career. She serves in the church as a catechist assistant, helps with local charities, volunteers as a tutor in the school math center, and even helps decorate floats for the Rose Parade. Luz has my most enthusiastic recommendation to be a Recreation/Community Services Student Commissioner for the City of Baldwin Park, Sincerely, lackwe A. white Principal BALDWIN PARK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Slott* Yl/to High School 16 *oplmm6d totho policy that all pooplo oball hove actual access to pro grams andhol lltlo alallba41 to pard to $us, color.0taod. WON at or ethnic o dein. WWI@ op. rocs, rolltlla* or panda[. I I= AQ11. 001KIT ERSONAL INFORP Name CITY OF BALDWIN PARK RECREATION / COMMUNITY SERVICES STUDENT COMMISSION INFORMATION FORM Name of Hi4aghS hool TION: [To be completed by Student) C, ('AS + � I � 0 1 Residence � PKA tr k i C Age: Date of Birth: Social Security # Home Phone No...& Message Phone NO._ E-mail address:, Grade: __LZ � Name of Parent(s) or Guard Student lives with: �<] Both Parents Mother Person to call in cape of Phone No.:._—AZ �—r— m_ 2 a J0. Date Graduation Year.:.: L!____ x 4 I I Father [ I Guardian Student's Signature faGuardieara U 7" Appointment Date:--_-_,, Re -Appointment 111to'_ ---------- . .. ....... ........... . . . ...... . . . ... . . ............ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............................................. cc: Personnel Department Recreation Director I Recreation Secretary Student's Name Name of ch( Home Addres Home Phone LP"I"_LEI Cl= u --C M M NDAT1O1 • Graduating Class of��. Note to Principal: Please provide a written letter of recommendation for the above named student. 0,111 kclke t rinci al"s Signature �h Lschool LSierra Tista 21 "Horne of the Dons" "? °. 3600 North Frazier Street - Baldwin Park, CA 91706 (626) 960-7741 Fax (626) 856-4050 City of Baldwin Park January 12, 2015 Dear Sir or Madam: Jacide WIiite Principal Alma Canal Assistant Principal Eric Lopez Assistant Principal Esther G. Villegas Assistant Principal It's a great pleasure to write this letter of recommendation for Miss Carla Castillo as she pursues a position, as Park Commissioner for the City of Baldwin Park. I have known Carla during her four years of high school,, and she Is a great candidate for this position. Carla is an outstanding student who is involved in a great many activities. She is president of our IDEAS Club, which works to assist undocumented students to go to college. She has organized, coordinated and implemented' workshops and fundraisers for this club as well as the Philosophy Club, the Speech and Debate Club, and the Spanish Club. Carla is an Honor Roll student who does not let her bLISY schedule interfere with her studies, and she is higl,ily respected by her teachers. She is fluent in English and Spanish, which makes her an asset to any community position in our City. She is kind, personable and trustworthy. Community Involvement is not new to Carla. In addition to being a true community servant in her school, Carla has worked with younger students at the East Valley Boys' and Girls' Club in their after-school program and has volunteered at the Baldwin Park Teen Center. Carla is familiar with the parks of Baldwin Park and knows her community well, Miss Carla Castillo has my most enthusiastic endorsement for a Parks and Recreation Commissioner. Please contact me if you need further information. Respectfully, Julde A. White BALDWIN PARK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT lito rt4 Willit 1119hSchool lgecillifiltled 14the P01110011stell people 0111 fi194 111111i It a cd a isle programa and fXCI [It[$ RWIRIQUI. to pard to age, color. ctood,gallonal or ethnic 00110 a fidI0911, race, 1411910n or vopdor. RECEIVED MAR 12 2015 CITY OF BALDWIN PARK CITY OF BALOWIN PARK RECREATION / COMMUNITY SERVICES CM CLERKS DEPARTMENT STUDENT COMMISSION INFORMATION FORM t1 i Name of High choiol PERSONAL INFORMATION: [To be completed by Student) Residence Addres . . ..... . .... . .......... . . . . ....... Age: --A-7—.- —, Date of Birth; Social Security # Home Phone Message Phone No._jW_.0_. E -Mail address:_ _k. ';._O_m ..- i,Vl\ Grade: Name of Parent(s) or Guardian(s) _y Graduation Year;.... Student lives with: [ 1/1 Both Parents [ I Mother [ I Father [ ] Guardian Person to call in case of emergencV:_ikas Phone No.:j Dale Appointment Date:— Re-Appointment Datc:__.- comments: cc: [ ] Personnel Department StudenVs Si rat '1jij'j*Jian Signature [ ] Recreation Director [ ] Recreation Secretary 3900 North Puente Avenue Anthony M. Ippolito, Principal Baldwin Park, CA 91706 Jose Cuevas, Assistant Principal Phone. (626) 960-5431 Gayle Morganstern, Assistant Principal Fax. (626) 856-4069 Fred Swift, Assistant Principal www.bpbroves.net Holly Farrell, ASB Director March 12, 2015 City of Baldwin Park 4100 Baldwin Park Boulevard Baldwin Park, CA 91706 Dear City Council Members: It is with enthusiasm to submit this letter of reference for Ms. Madeline Gutierrez who is applying for the position of Student Coininissionerwith the City of Baldwin Park. Presently, Madeline is in herjunior year at Baldwin Park High School. I have had the pleasure of knowing Madelinc for the last 3 years in my role as Principal at aldwin Park high School. it is my pleasure to ql1al-c with you the accomplishments of Ms. Madeline Gutierrez. Madeline is a high performing Student who maintains a rigorous academic schedule. She is an active participant it) nunicrous school clubs and organizations and also gives tinte to her conlinunity. On an academic level, Nladelille maintains a 3.97 cumulative GPA. She is enrolled in several college prep Bout sc% Madeline is a member in various clubs and organizations: AVID Club, Key Club, Adelante Club, and she is a member of the Hippocrates Circle. Further, Madeline's volunteer experience includes: Rose Float decorating, Box for Troops, Run or Dye, care packaging, Christmas gift wrapping, and volunteers in the community Food Drive. Furthermore, Madeline is bilingual in English and Spanish, a quality that is beneficial for our community. Notably, Madeline is the reciplent of several awards. She was the recipient of the distinguished Principal's Award, Achievement Award, and Brave Scholar Award. it is my pleasure to reconillnead Ms, Madeline Gutierrez, for your consideration as a viable candidate for the position of Student Coniju Lssloner fort the City of Baldwin Park. Madeline is personable, intelligent, and a responsible young lady with excellent leadership qualities. If chosen, she will undoubtedly serve the community with pride. Sincerely, Mr.i pylpl o, Principal % I Baldwin , I -I i School (626) 960-5431 ext. 3105 (626) 705-7288 (work cell) BOARD OF EDUCATION Teresa L. Vargas, President Christina Lucero, Clerk /Vlce President Carlos Lopez, Member - BlancaEstela Ruble, Member Jack B. WhHe, Pout Soyillono, Superintendent of Schools RECEIVED Plµ�"TCI CITY OF BALDWIN PARK FEB: - 2 206 " EPY aF- APPLICATION FOR CITY COMMISSION rtfV61"f3J1lf1 II�fJrtfift UTILITY WLI., D And CITY ff11 f1NPf11 i"h INT COPY P; OIJ STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS APPLICATION IS FOR THE FOLLOWING COMMISSION:---------*mmm �'tVG1eX1-�" �yrinis5 i Over — A-sesfa ttafo gppy glon is eytdroof for each orrlfatlas/ora _ PERSONAL INFO,R`M.ATION: Name Residence Addra ss, _.,_. .._ � � w_mm •. .._. .. Length of time at this Address: 15 Vys. E-mail address:_ Home Phone No.. F�.i;._ �__... �....� �.m�...� Cell/Message Phone leo._ ... ..,..... Are you 18 years of age or older? N O _ Are you registered to vote in the City of Baldwin Park?----"LO,.--- Do ark?.,,•_ ",0,._Do you currently aserve as an elected or me of agency and pos appointed official for any board and/or agency within the City of Baldwin Park? If yes, EDUCATION: Circle Highest grade you completed: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 (9 11 12 High School Graduate? StO k l0 G.E.D.?. EMPLOYMENT INFORMATION / EXPERIENCE: REFERENCES: Please provide the names of two (@) persons, who are not City of Baldwin Park Elected or Appointed Officials and who can comment on your capabilities and character. IMPORTANT: Read the following carefully and answer completely. A conviction Is not an automatic bar to appointment. Each case Is considered on its individual tnerits. NO HAVE YOU EWER BEEN CONVICTED OF A FELONY OR MISDEMEANOR OTHER THAN A MINOR TRAFFIC VIOLATION? If yes„ pleaso list all offonsos, date and place of offense(s), and sentence/f rie received: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT/CERTIFICATION: I understand That of n fildojg, this appilofattotl becomos a public record. I certify under penalty of per WY Under tele lags of ttie State of California that the foregoing is truo and correct. s_ ,,..0{.�,° mature Voter Registration Verification: ❑ Yes ❑ No Appointment date:. _ �.�........................_ _m_,,,. ....,....._ Term expit-es: _...__..... _... -: Commission Requested: iva-- --V� STAT Lmg- Use this space to list your goals and objectives and why you feel you should be ;appointed to the commission for which you are applying. Please include any additional informaWn YOU feel will be beneficial to the Council In consideration of your appointment to this commission. 4_,kl ffe r lel Date:, Signature Notice: Please be advised that you and your qualifications may be discussed by the City Council at an open meeting. This Application and Statemont of Qiialifiration will tae kopt oil No fi")j, two (2) yoar& Dining this time., should a, vacancy occur in the conimission for whiodi you have MqUestod consideration of aPPOO(MOnt, your aWlicati0l'? Will bo included in the pool of apj)flGM7t$ provided ho ever, that you submit curreW PrOOf Of r0s1d0nGY at 070 UM0 of'saki recruitn7ent, Fedlure to provido current proof of I'Osi(jency with ezich recrifitinent will irivalidate this application, RECEIVE® CITY OF BALDWIN PARK MAR 12 2015 RECREATION / COMMUNITY SERVICES STUDENT COMMISSION INFORMATION FOR...... CITY OF BALDWIN PARK CITY CLERKS DEPARTMENT PERSONALfi' i ""0N'.ITo be compkied by lUdo) Resldenoe A4cl.....- 1 �� A90-. Uafe of Birth.Segal seaft #— Honw Phwm No Phone NO—(I. Name of P�rerrt(s) crirer�lirni .� _ t� ` l l?f° " student Rivas with: [ j% Sots Parents [ j Mother [ I Father [ I Guardian ramn to call in case pf 4 r1 en ` j t l Phone No, I C Par ry G gni n Appointment Data: Ro-Amobttr tit cc: [ ] Personnel t partmad [ ] Recreation Director �j , ] Recr tion Secretary Baldwin Park, CA 91706 Phone, (626) 960-5431 Fax.- (626) 856-4069 www,bpbraves.net February 13, 2013 City of Baldwin Park 4100 Baldwin Park Boulevard Baldwin Park, CA 91706 Dear City Council Members: rrect OWItT, ASSISTC111T r-111K.11JUI Holly Farrell, ASB Director It is with enthusiasm to submit this letter of reference for Ms, Yareli Martinez who is applying for the position of Student Commissioner with the City of Baldwin Park. Presently, Yareli is in her junior Year at Baldwin Park high School. I have had the pleasure of knowitjg yal,cli for the last 3 years in my role as Principal at Baldwin Park High School. it is my pleasure to share with you the accomplishments of Ms, Yareli Martinez, Yareli is a high perflorming student who maintains a rigorous academic schedule. She is an active participant in numerous school clubs and organizations and also, gives time to her conimunity. On an academic, level, Yareli maintains a 4.3 cumulative GPA. She is enrolled mostly in, advanced placement cot, ses, Yaroli is a member in various clubs and organizations: AVID Club, California' Scholm-ship Federation (CSF), National lionorSoci0y, CaM Culture Club, she is the editor ofthe Key Club Bulletin, and is (lie current Key, ("h bTreasurer. Further, Yareli actively volunteers at lict, chumli, Morgan Park, and at the Baldwin Park, Teen Center, Slrc was the MAPS C'oltcgc Fair organizer, and volunteers as a rnath tutor at Baldwin Park High School. Furthermore, Yareli is bilingual in English and Spaiflsl"i, a quality that is berieficial for our coni till) 11 ity. Notably, Yareli is the recipient of several awards. She was the recipient of the Brave Distinguished Scholar Award in 2012, 2013, and 2014. In addition, she was awarded the AVID Excellence Award in 2014, and was ranked in the top five of her class in the 2014. It is my pleasure to recommend Ms. Yareli Martinez, for your consideration as a viable candidate for the position of Student Commissioner for the City of Baldwin Park, Yareli is personable, intelligent, and a responsible yoling lady with excellent leadership qualities. If chosen, she will undoubtedly serve the community with pride. RECEIVED m PLA A "TACH A CITY OF BALDWIN PARK FEB":" 2 261 I,,I�NT '� O '' APPLICATION FOR CITY COMMISSION A tUTIILITY SILL ASC And CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ' f N , 0Ca' YOUI0 ; CnTY CLERKS DEPARTMENT STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS APPLICATION IS FOR FOLLOWING COMMISSION: _. (A sep rqfea if on is ta'l to each oorararfssa_. . , ....... u_ PERSONAL INFORMATION; Residence Address Length of time at this Address: E-mail address: Home Phone ta..••••– Cell/Messa a Phone iNo._ _.. ri, ��•.....��.�. __...�.n�..��.... _w.. _m g �.,�•}---— Are you 18 years of age or older? .._........ _. Are you registered to vote in the City of Baldwin Park?� Do you currently serve as pan elected or appointed official for any board and/or agency within the City of Baldwin Park? � d I Circle HighestON. rade you completed: d: p1 s2r 3 �} 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Hi h School Graduate? __. GED, EDUCATION: /to EMPLOYMENT INFORMATION 1 EXPERIENCE: REFERENCES: Please provide the names of two (@) persons, who are not City of Baldwin Park Elected or Appointed Officials and who can comment on your capabilities and character. IMPORTANT: Read the following carefully and answer completely. A conviction Is not an automatic bar to appointment. Each case is considered on its Individual merits. HAVE YOU EVER BEEN CONVICTED OF A FELONY OR MISDEMEANOR OTHER THAN A MINOR TRAFFIC VIOLATION?, If yos, Pleaso list all offonses, date and place of offense(s),, and sentence/fine received: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT/CERTIFICATION: 1 understand that upon filing, this application becomes a public record. I certify undarp analty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing Is true and correct. 7-- ,- \ `_ Date S Residency y verificatiot a: ❑Yes ❑ No Date:,--....., , Voter Registration Verification: El Yes El No Residency verification: ❑ Yes ❑ No Date. ........_ Appointment date: µµwww t�tGsrait��raca verification: Y EJ Yes No trate,r ;..... ... .... Term a xpires :_ _..... _ter-\eNVIA: �� _ _ (vt`l1 w�l tis wi lie ts.0 �[isltiiw� CITY OF BALDWIN PARK RECREATION / COMMUNITY SERVICES STUDENT COMMISSION INFORMATION FORM 80v'/� .-k Name of High School r w..z-mw " a . _ _ PERSONAL INFORMATION [To be completed by Student) Residence Address �_. cr t.w Age: —fl—, Date of Birth: _�....� ....... _ Social Security # Home Phone No.� Message Phone No,&e -&� _........ ..w E-mail Grade: Graduation Year. ' o 16 Name of Parent($) or Guardian(s) �f ' Lu J ° - ..–.. -. Student lives with: [ ] Both Parents [ ] Mother [Father [ ] Guardian Person to call in case of emergency .;:r.,,.....� Phone No.: (,.._ �. ............. �r Date Appointment Re -Appointment D ttc: cc: [ ] Personnel Department [ ] Recreation Director [ ] Recreation Secretary Sorth Park High School Vince Pratt, Principal Clara Evans, Assistant Principal Continuation and Alternative Education Programs 4600 North Bogart Avenue, Baldwin. Park, California 91706 Phone: (626) 337-4407 Pay:: (626) 856-4402 To Whom It May Concern, Anthony Grij alva, , was transferred to North Park High School during the 2014-2015 school year. That was his Junior year and I am pleased to confirm he is on track to graduate early as a Senior. He passed both parts of the California High School Exit Examination and a has a North Park GPA of 2.00. Anthony carne to our school after spending grades 9-10 at Baldwin Park High School. It is my pleasure to say the transfer was a success! He has not only accelerated his credit completion rate but he has maintained an excellent attendance record while at North Park. This is a dramatic difference from when Anthony was referred to the local charter school before arriving at North Park. Anthony has a strong desire to follow a career in the music industry. He is now thinking about the future, his graduation and his career in the field he loves. Based on my experiences with Anthony I can confirm he is a dedicated student who has matured at North Park and has learned from the mistakes of the past. He is an intelligent and well spoken young man who would be an asset to any organiztion. Please give him every consideration when consdering him for the student representative postition.. X have attached an copy of his transcript. Please feel free to contact me with any further questions. Sincerely,,,.,, James )." . North Park Counseling (626) 856-4494 Oworick942@bpusd.net) AGENDA • •N NOVEMBER 18, 2015 7:00 PM REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBER 14403 E. PACIFIC AVENUE BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 (626) 960-4011 FiU;OF TSF SAKI �CA RIEL 10 0 INALL" I'ED .IANk3 Manuel Lozano Cruz Baca Monica Garcia Ricardo Pacheco Susan Rubio - Chair - Vice Chair - Board Member - Board Member - Board Member PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES AND PAGERS WHILE MEETING IS IN PROCESS POR FAVOR DE APAGAR SUS TELEFONOS CELULARES Y BEEPERS DURANTE LA JUNTA PUBLIC COMMENTS The public is encouraged to address the Housing Authority on any matter posted on the, agenda or on any other matter within its jurisdiction. If you wish to address the Board, you may do so during the PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS period noted on the agenda. Each person is allowed three (3) minutes speaking time. A Spanish speaking interpreter is available for your convenience. COMENTARIOS DEL PUBLICO Se invita al publico a dirigirse a la Agencia nombrada en esta agenda, para hablar sobre cualquier asunto publicado en la agenda o cualquier tema que este bajo su jurisdiccidn. Si usted desea la oportunidad de dirigirse a la Agencia, podra hacerlo durante el perfodo de Comentarios del Publico (Public Communications) anunciado en la agenda. A cada persona se le permite hablar por Cres (3) minutos. Hay un interprete para su conveniencia. ,°ir' y 4£M1'A"P'ffi: y?RiNis WP,a`wd 'lot i''m o)"F i1 14403 � F'4)cvf'c, 0,aGamPS HOUSING AUTHORITY REGULAR MEETING — 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL Board Members: Monica Garcia, Ricardo Pacheco, Susan Rubio, Vice Chair Cruz Baca and Chair Manuel Lozano PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Three (3) minute speaking time limit Tres (3) minutos ser6 el limite para hablar THIS IS THE TIME SET ASIDE TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION No action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances exist. The legislative body or its staff may: 1) Briefly respond to statements made or questions asked by persons; or 2) Direct staff to investigate and%r schadule matters for consideration at a future trieeting, [Gover°tiniest Code §54954.2)' ESTE ES EL PERIODO DESIGNADO PARA DIRIGIRSE AL COMISION No se podra tomar accOn en algtin asunto a menos que sea incluido en la agenda, o a menos que exista alg6na emergencia o circunstancia especial. EI cuerpo legislativo y su personal podran: 1) Responder brveniente a declaracianes o preguntas hechas por personas; o 2) Dirigir personal a investigar y/o fijar asuntos para tomar en consideracion en juntas proximas. (Codigo de Gobierno §54954.21 CONSENT CALENDAR 1. TREASURER'S REPORT — SEPTEMBER 2015 Staff recommends that Council receive and file the Treasurer's Report for the month of September 2015. ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATION I, Alejandra Avila, Secretary of the Housing Authority hereby certify that, under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, the foregoing agenda was posted on the City Hall bulletin board not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting. Gated this 12th day of November 2015. ell Alejandra Avila Secretary PLEASE LE S NOTECopies of Co �m p staff reports grad supporting documentation pertaining to each item on this agenda are available for pcviewing and inspection at City Hallo 20d Floor Lobby Area or at the Los Angeles County Public Library in the City of Baldwin Park. For further information regarding agenda items, please contact the office of the City Clerk at (626) 960-4011 ext. 466 or via e-mail at kf'rwi �Offri1bMdWiU, _)a'rk 2Q1T_) . In connpliance with the Ar°riericanswith Disiibililies Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please col,itacenabletstaff Public Wotks reasonable rarrrangemenrts toaensure accrs it lil 6to this ineeNotification ng. (2 1CFR 34r10Z 1 to the Meeting 1 witl ( ) ' � � 101 ALBA f"lTl..t�' ll) ITEM NO. R ERT S] AFF PO TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers 'F F ", FROM: Terry Shea, Interim Director of Finance • DATE: November 18, 2015 SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT SEPTEMBER 2015 StiMMARY Attached is, the Treasurer's Report for the months of September 2015. The Treasurer's Report lists all cash for the City (which includes the Baldwin Park Financing Authority), the Housing ousing Authority, and the Successor Agency to the Coininunity Development Conimission (CDC). All investments are in coinplial-lCe with the City's Livestment Policy and the Califox-iiia Governineiit Code. FISCAI, IMPACT None L I j', G A I , R ,V 1 -E- W None required. R F, C Q M N4 E N 1) A: r10 N Staff recommends that Council receive and file the Treasurer's Report for September 2015. _6ACWGR017ND The City's Investment Policy requires the Treasurer's Report be submitted to the Mayor and City Council on a monthly basis. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK TREASURER'S REPORT 9130/2015 ..... — --�-�-•--�•� ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE nN� Et°° wpTpt°3rJ STMENT INTEREST PURCHASE MATURITY _ ... VALUE�.. PRINCIPAL _ VALPAR CURRENT UE State of California Local Agency Investment Fund 0.34% Varies Varies 25,144,287.50 25,144,287.50 25,144,287.50 25,144,287.50 City Housing Authority 0.34% Varies Varies 13,073.35 13,073.35 13,073.35 13,073.35 ..._....� . ...... 25 157 360.85 - 25,157 360.85 25,157 360 85 60.85 25,157,360.35 Fiscal Agent Funds - City Varies Varies Varies 2,448,628.92 2,448,628.92 2,448,628.92 2,448,628.92 Fiscal Agent Funds - Successc Varies Varies Varies 2,938,099.18 2,938,099.18 2,938,099.18 2,938,099.18 $30 544 088.95 $ 30„S44 088.95 mm _.....10 5,386,7288 305.10 $ ?F4 088 9,a , -�_. .. .. . Total Investments $ 30,544,088.95 Cash City Checking 6,305,131.58 City Miscellaneous Cash 478,935.75 Comm. Develop. Comm. 0.00 Successor Agency 4,005,102.00 Housing Authority 96,193.40 Financing Authority 0.00 Total Cash 10,885,362.73 Total Cash and Investments Schedule of Cash and Investments includes all financial assets as included in the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. There was no investment maturity/purchase transaction made for the month of September 2015 and several depositstwithdrawals were made with the Local Agency Investment Fund. In compliance with the California Government Code Section 53646 et seq., I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are avrailable'to meet the City's expenditure requirements for the next six months that all investments are in compliance to the City's Statement of Investment Policy. Approved by: Terry Shea Interim Director of Finance AGENDA BALDWIN PARK FINANCE AUTHORITY NOVEMBER 18, 2015 7:00 PM REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBER 14403 E. PACIFIC AVENUE BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 (626) 960-4011 Manuel Lozano Cruz Baca Monica Garcia Ricardo Pacheco Susan Rubio - Chair - Vice Chair - Board Member - Board Member - Board Member PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES AND PAGERS WH/LE MEETING /S /N PROCESS POR FA VOR DE APAGAR SUS TELEFONOS CEL ULARES Y BEEPERS DURANTE LA JUNTA PUBLIC COMMENTS The public is encouraged to address the Finance Authority on any matter posted on tho agenda or on any other matter within its jurisdiction. If you wish to address the Board, you may do so during the PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS period noted on the agenda. Each person is allowed three (3) minutes speaking time. A Spanish speaking interpreter is available for your convenience. COMENTARIOS DEL PUBLICO Se invita al publico a dirigirse a la Agencia nombrada en esta agenda, parva hablar sobre cuaalaluier asunto public ado en la agenda o cualcluier tenor gue este bajo mu jutdsdicci6n. Si usted desea la oportunidad de dirigirse a la Agencia, podr5 hacerlo durante el periodo de Comentarios del Pdblico (Public Communications) anunciado en la agenda. A cada persona se le permite hablar por tres (3) minutos. Hay un interprete para su conveniencia. Any written public record relating to an agenda item for an open session of a regular meeting of the Finance Authority that is distributed to the Housing Authority less than 72 hours prior to that meeting will be available for public inspection at City Hall in the City Clerk's office at 14403 E, Pacific Avenue, 3rd Floor during normal business hours (Monday - Thursday, 7:30 a.m. - 6:00 p.m.) FINANCE AUTHORITY REGULAR MEETING — 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL Board Members: Monica Garcia, Ricardo Pacheco, Susan Rubio, Vice Chair Cruz Baca and Chair Manuel Lozand PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Three (3) minute speaking time limit Tres (3) minutos sera el limite para hablar THIS IS THE TIME SET ASIDE TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION No action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances exist. The legislative body or its staff may: 1) Briefly respond to statements made or questions asked by persons; or 2) Direct staff to investigate and/or schedule matters for consideration at a folure fneeting, [Governivent Code §54954,2] ESTE ES EL PERIODO DESIGNADO PARA DIRIGIRSE AL comlsl6N No se podia tomar acci6n on alg(m asunto, a menos que sea incloido en la agenda, a a menos que exista a4g6ina emergencia, o circunstancia especial. El cuerpo legislativo y su personal podran.� 1) Responder brewernente a declaraci6nes o preguotas hechas por personas; o 2) Dirigir personal a investigar y10 hjar asuntos para tomar en consideraci6n en juntas proximas. [Codigo de Gobierno §54954.2] 1. TREASURER'S REPORT — SEPTEMBER 2015 Staff recommends that Council receive and file the Treasurer's Report for the month of September 2015. QNSHWUM 9 CERTIFICATION 1, Alejandra Avila, Secretary of the Finance Authority hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing agenda was posted on the City Hall bulletin board not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting. Dated this 12 " day of November, 2015. Alejandra Avila .qi=r-rj=tnry PLEASE NOTE, Copies of staff reports and sull1 )oltinIg documentation pertaining to each item on this agenda are available for public viewing and inspection W City Hall, 2"'1Floor Lobby Area or at the Los Angeles County Public Library in the City of Baldwin Paik, For forther infbivicitiori regarding agenda items, please contact the office of the City Clerk at (626) 960-4011 ext. 466 or via e-mail at kCiiss—ell@,L)Li—I(writ Pj'ltk,=001. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this alveting, pledscl contact the Public Works Department or Risk Management aat (626) 960-4011 . Notification 48 hour.,-, prior to the ineetirT will enable staff to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this "Weti,19, (28 CHR 34.102,104 AIM TITLE STAFF .Z TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: ITEM NO. W01 51 ) E0111 1/1" ON �5 I 0/ a Nil Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Terry Shea, Interim Director of Finance November 18, 2015 TREASURER'S REPORT SEPTEMBER 2015 SLU-MMAIZY Attached is Ilie Treasurer's Report for the months of September 2015. The Treasurer's Report lists all cash for the City (which includes the Baldwin Park Financing Authority), the Housing Authority, an the Successor Agency to the Community Development Commission (CDC). All invests eats are iri compliance with the City's Investment Policy and the California Government Code. FISCAL IMPACT' None LEGAL IZFVIEW None required. IIIXOM ME, NDATION Staff recommends that Council receive and file the Treasurer's Report for September 2015. BACKGROUND The City's Investment Policy requires the Treasurer's Report be submitted to the Mayor and City Council on a monthly basis. - CITY OF BALDWIN PARK TREASURER'S REPORT 9130/2015 Schedule of Cash and Investments includes all financial assets as included in the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. There was no investment maturity/purchase transaction made for the month of September 2015 and several deposits/withdrawals were made with the Local Agency Investment Fund. In compliance with the California Government Code Section 53646 et seq., I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the City's expenditure requirements for the next six months that all investments are in compliance to the City's Statement of Investment Policy. Approved by: Terry Shea Interim Director.of Finance ESTIMATED INVESTMENT INTEREST PURCHASE MATURITY PAR CURRENT BOOK MARKET DESCRIPTINVESTMENT ION 7mm DATE TE _., VALUE � PRINCIPAL. a..� VALUE VALUE State of California Local Agency Investment Fund City 0.34% Varies Varies 25,144,287.50 25,144,287.50 25,144,287.50 25,144,287.50 Housing Authority 0.34% Varies Varies 13,073.35 13,073.35 13,073.35 13,073.35 m 25,157,360.85 25,157,360.85 25,157,360.85 25,1 57,360.85 Fiscal Agent Funds - City Varies Varies Varles 2,448,628.92 2,448,628.92 2,448,628.92 2,448,628.92 Fiscal Agent Funds - Successc Varies Varies Varies 2,938,099.18 2,938,099.18 2,938,099.18 2,938,099.18 $ 30 544 088..95IT $ : 30544 088 6 5,386,728.10 $ 3a,544 088 95 Total Investments $ 30,544,088.95 Cash City Checking 6,305,131.58 City Miscellaneous Cash 478,935.75 Comm. Develop. Comm. 0.00 Successor Agency 4,005,102.00 Housing Authority 96,193.40 Financing Authority ---- 0.00 Total Cash 10,886,362.73 Total Cash and Investments $ 41429,451.68 Schedule of Cash and Investments includes all financial assets as included in the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. There was no investment maturity/purchase transaction made for the month of September 2015 and several deposits/withdrawals were made with the Local Agency Investment Fund. In compliance with the California Government Code Section 53646 et seq., I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the City's expenditure requirements for the next six months that all investments are in compliance to the City's Statement of Investment Policy. Approved by: Terry Shea Interim Director.of Finance