HomeMy WebLinkAbout1963 08 27 CC MIN1963 08 27 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— + ŸÍ«33'7
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE BALDWIN, PARK CifY COUNCIL AUGUST 27, 1963
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER) 14403 East,Pacific Avenue 7:00 P.M.
In accordance with Section 22932 and 22933, Elections Code,
State of California, the City Council of the City of Baldwin
Park met at the above place at the hour of 7:00 p.m. to
canvass the returns of the Special Municipal Election of
August 20, 1963 and to adopt an applicable resolution.
Roll Call: Present: COUNCILMEN BISHOP, MOREHEAD ROLL CALL
TAYLOR AND MAYOR BLC(HAM
Absent: COUNCILMAN HOLMES, FINANCE
DIRECTOR DUNCAN AND CITY TREASURER
PUGH
Also Present: CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER
NORDBY, CITY ATTORNEY FLANDRICK,
CITY ENGINEER YOUNG, ASSISTANT
CITY ENGINEER WELCH, PLANNING
DIRECTOR AND BUILDING SUPERIN-
TENDENT KALBFLEISCH, CHIEF OF
POLICE BEST AND CITY CLERK
BALKUS
Present for discussion on the final review of documents and ALSO PRESENT
procedures relative to Sewer District No. 62-A-1 were the
following:
Mr. Urban J. Schreiner, Representing O'Melveny & Myers,
Mr. Patrick Rosetti, Representing Laurence Thompson,
Assessment Engineers, Mr. W. R. Kolberg, Representing
Stone & Youngberg, Financial Consultants and Mr. James
Sims, Representing Ivor Lyons & Associates, Engineer of
Work.
00-
Mayor Bloxham administered a special oath to Patrolman SPECIAL OATH
Alfred Benzor, a law enforcement officer. ALFRED BENZOR, LAW
ENFORCEMENT OFFICER
00--
the City Council proceeded with the canvass, with Council- CANVASSING OF VOTES
man Morehead opening the No. 2 envelope for each precinct SPECIAL MUNICIPAL
and the absentee vote; Councilman Bishop read the vote from ELECTION
the tally sheets, and Councilwoman Taylor, with Mr. Nordby AUGUST 20, 1963
as witness, compared the Result of Votes Cast.
The measure voted upon on August 20, 1963, a tabulation of
the number of votes given at each precinct for and against
the measure and the whole number of votes cast is as follows:
MEASURE SUBMITTED TO VOTE OF VOTERS
I
CITY OF BALDWIN PARK Referendum, Shall Ordinance Number YES
41 of the City of Baldwin Park, which rezones certain therein described
eal property from Zones A-1 and M-1 to Zones R-l and C-2 denominated NO
one Change Case No. Z-125" be adopted?
Continued)
BIB]
39561-U01
1963-U02
08-U02
27-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO115492-U03
DO116777-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
4/22/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1963 08 27 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— + ŸÍ«4 Q38
Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park'City Council August 27, 1963
Page 2
Voting
p inct
Yes o t a i
Fejti t?d
Ng Pasofs Total
Ballots
Voted
2 41
50 43
Z 134
102
3 48 69 117
4 65 60 125---
5 82 75 157
6 75 66 141
7 49 87 16
8 61 81 142
9 43 40 3 86
10 38 54 92
11 66 83 149
12 19 38 57
13 32 73 105
14 18 40 8
15 38 10'? i 14-5
16 29 84
17 35 64 29
18 29 78 107
19 32 67 99
20 8 31 9
21
28
68
96
22 38 58 97
23 40 30 70
Absentee Vote 17 15 32
t s L4 1 4. 2448
City Clerk Balkus read in full Resolution No. 63-116, entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 63-116
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DECLARING THE RESULT
OF THE SPECIAL ELECTION HELD ON THE 2(jTH
DAY OF AUGUST 1963, AND DECLARING THE RE-
SULT OF TI;E CANVASS OF THE VOLES CAST AT
SAID ELECT I ON. 1
COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 63-1 16 BE ADOPTED
AS READ. COUNCiLMAN MORE.HEAD SECONDED. The motion carried by
the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN 1I)REHEAD, TAYLOR, BISHOP AND
MAYOR 3L9XHAM
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMAN HOLMES
00-
RES. NO. 63-116
DECLARING THE RESL
OF SPECIAL ELECTI(
HELD ON 20TH DAY
OF AUGUST 1963, At
DECLARING RESULT C
CANVASS OF VOTES
CAST AT SAID EL EC-
T I ON
RES, NO. 63-116
ADUPT ED
BIB]
39561-U01
1963-U02
08-U02
27-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO115492-U03
DO116777-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
4/22/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1963 08 27 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— + ŸÍ«1339
Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council
City Attorney Flandrick read Resolution No. 63-114 by title
as follows:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF BALDWIN PARK CLARIFYING CERTAIN
AMBIGUITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 9103.2
OF THE BALDWIN PARK 14JNICIPAL CCDE."
I
Mr. Flandrick explained the purpose of the resolution;
that it was drawn as there is a provision in the zoning
ordinance in connection with conditional use permits and
variances stating the basis whereby uses can be revoked
but there is no field provision for the Planning Commis-
sion to hear revocation matters; and this resolution
would handle the problem in the interim period until an
ordinance would become effective; he further explained
that under proper ordinance the Planning Commission acts
as an advisory board and the City Council has the final
action.
COUNCILMAN BISHOP MOVED THAT A MORATORIUM BE CALLED ON ALL
SPECIAL USE PERMITS AND VARIANCES UNTIL THE ORDINANCE IS
STRAIGHTENED OUT,
Discussion followed on variances in process". The City
Council directed that an emergency ordinance be prepared
then matters now pending would come before the City Coun-
cil for public hearing.
THE MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND.
The City Attorney said he would prepare such an ordinance
for presentation later in the meeting.
00-
City Clerk Balkus read Resolution No. 63-110 by title as
follows:
RESOLUTION NO. 63-I10
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF BALDWIN PARK CLARIFYING CERTAIN
AMBIGUITIES REGARDING THE NUMBER OF OFF
STREET PARKING SPACES REQUIRED FOR MOTELS
AND HOTELS WITHIN SAID CITY".
COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO, 63-110 BE
APPROVED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. CCUNC I UVJOMAN TAYLOR
SECONDED.
Discussion foil
owed as to adequate
space, etc.
Themoti motion ca carried by t he following ng vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN MOREHEAD, TAYLOR, BISHOP
AND MAYOR BLCKHAM
NOES NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMAN HOLMES
00-
City Clerk Balkus presented Superior Court Summons Case
No. ECA2010 Minerva L. Walker.
COUNCILMAN BISHOP MOVED THAT THIS CLAIM BE DENIED AND
REFERRED TO THE INSURANCE CARRIER. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD
SECONDED. There were no objections, the motion carried
and was so ordered by Mayor Bloxham.
00-
August 27, 1963
Page 3
RES. NO. 63-I14
CLARIFYING CERTAIN
AMBIGUITIES PURSUAM;
TO SECTION 9103.2
OF B.PK. MUN. CODE
MOTION MAD E
MOTION D I ED FOR LACK
OF SECOND
ATTY. TO PREPARE
ORD. FOR PRESENTA-
TION LATER IN MTG.
RES. NO. 63-110
CLARIFYING CERTAIN
AMB I GU I T 1 ES REGARD-
ING NO. CF OFF STREET
PARKING SPACES RE-
QU I RED FOR MOTELS
AND HOTELS WITHIN
SAID CITY
RES. NO. 63-HO
ADOPTED
MOTION CARRIED
SUPERIOR COURT
SUMMONS MINERVA
L. 1'JA L KER
CLAIM DENIED AND RE-
FERRED TO INS. CABBIE
BIB]
39561-U01
1963-U02
08-U02
27-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO115492-U03
DO116777-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
4/22/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1963 08 27 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— + ŸÍ«134 OAdjou rned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council
City Clerk Balkus stated that the following applications
for Alcoholic Beverage Licenses had been received:
Donald T. Bray, 13833 Francisquito Avenue
Jesse V. Salcedo, 13127-29 E. Garvey Avenue
Henry A. and Julia B. Lentini, 14615 E. Garvey Avenue
Robert G. and Verne W. Schwarz, 14354 Olive Street
There was NO ACTION REQUIRED.
00-
City Clerk Balkus stated that a bid had been received on
the City owned property at Los Angeles and Stewart Streets;
that the notice inviting bids was published August 9th and
15th, 1963, outlining the description; the date of re-
ceiving and opening, August 21, 1963, 3:00 p.m.; that no
bid less than $3,800 was to be considered; that bid was to
be accompanied by certified check in an amount of not less
than 10% of the bid. The bid received was from Uriel Ivan
Reynolds, 14006 Los Angeles Street, Baldwin Park, California
in the amount of $3,826.00, accompanied by a certified
check in the amount of $382.60.
Councilman Bishop ascertained that the twenty-five 25)
foot strip on Stewart was included.
COUNCILMAN BISHOP MOVED THAT THE CITY ACCEPT THE BID IN
THE AMOUNT OF $3,826.00 AND THAT THE SELLER WOULD PAY THE
SELLERS PART AND THE BUYER WOULD PAY THE BUYERS PART.
COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR SECONDED.
Councilman Morehead inquired as to why the property had been
acquired, and it was explained that a portion of the land
was necessary for the widening of Stewart Street.
Discussion indicated this amount would be deposited in the
general fund.
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN BISHOP, TAYLOR, MOREHEAD
AND MAYOR BLC(HAM
NOES NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMAN HOLMES
00-
City Clerk Balkus read the notice of the Third Annual
Seminar, September 21 and 22, 1963 from The Independent
Cities of Los Angeles County at Avalon and asked which of
the Council planned to attend.
Discussion followed and Council instructed that this be held
until next regular meeting.
00-
Mrs. Balkus stated a claim had been filed in the name of
Harlow, Ruth and Henry Buchanan.
COUNCILMAN BISHOP MOVED THAT THE CLAIM BE DENIED AND RE-
FERRED TO THE INSURANCE CARRIER. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD
SECONDED. There were no objections, the motion carried
and was so ordered by Mayor B4oxham.
August 27, 1963
Page 4
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE
LICENSE APPLICATIONS
Donald T. Bray, 1383.
Francisquito Ave.,
Jesse V. Saicedo,
13127-29 E. Garvey
Ave., Henry A. &
Julia 8. Lentini,
14615 E. Garvey Ave.
& Robt. G. & Verne V
Schwarz, 14354
Olive St.
NO ACTION REQUIRED
BID CITY OWNED
PROPERTY L.A. AND
STBNART STREETS
81DDER URIEL IVAN
REYNOLDS, 14006 Los
Angeles St., B.Pk.
MOTION MADE AND
CARRIED THAT CITY
ACCEPT BID I N AMT.
OF $3,826.00
THIRD ANNUAL. SEM I NAF
INDEPENDENT CITIES
CLAIM BUCHANAN
DENIED AND REFERRED
TO INS. CARRIER
BIB]
39561-U01
1963-U02
08-U02
27-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO115492-U03
DO116777-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
4/22/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1963 08 27 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— + ŸÍ«1341
Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council
Chief Administrative Officer Nordby explained that he had
received a response from Supervisor Frank Bonelli relating
to the City's proposal concerning development of excess
Flood Control District property along Big Dalton Wash;
that attached to the letter was an adverse report from
Road Commissioner N. H. Templin wherein he stated it would
be difficult to recommend highway funds for the purpose
outlined. Mr. Nordby explained that possibly when a copy
of the Collier Bill is received the City may get financial
assistance under select aid for streets. The League of
California Cities is preparing an explanation whereby
cities can receive assistance.
00-
Mr. Nordby explained that the next item, was a request from
James Floe, Roseglen Construction, to acquire a portion of
Flood Control Excess Property which referred to the same
area. He presented a map of the area and explained that
Mr. Floe desired to acquire property between the condominium
which the company is building at Vineland and Garvey, and
Big Dalton Wash. This parcel is the southerly portion of the
836 strip. Mr. Nordby stated that discussion with Mr.
Young and Mr. Welch indicated they could see no objection
to the conveyance of the property from Flood Control to
Roseglen as the City would still have control over the
development, and Planning Commission Resolution No. 950,
suggests that the developer attempt to acquire the subject
parcel and incorporate it into the development. Mr.
Nordby recommended that the City notify the County that
the City is not interested in the property.
Mr. Bill Norris, representing Roseglen Construction Company
stated they have made an offer to the Flood Control
District; that they would request rezoning on the property;
that this would be a recreational area; that there is
approximately 30,000 square feet involved.
COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CONCUR
WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER AND THAT HE WRITE A LETTER RELINQUISHING THIS
PROPERTY AND TELL THEM WE ARE NOT I NTERESTED IN IT.
COUNCILAM6 N BISHOP SECONDED.
Discussion followed regarding present A-1 zoning and the
possibility of the property being built on and the form
of action the Council should take.
City Attorney Flandrick suggested that the City request the
Flood Control District Place a stipulation as to what could
be placed on the property and the buyer would have to accept
this condition.
Mr. Norris explained that this was land locked property
and could be developed now if they had the property.
WITH THE CONSENT OF THE SECOND THE MOTION WAS WITHDRAWN.
COUNCILMAN BISHOP MOVED THAT THIS ITEM BE TABLED UNTIL NEXT
REGULAR MEETING SO THE CITY ATTORNEY AND THE CHIEF ADMINIS-
TRATIVE OFFICER CAN CHECK FURTHER. COUNCIIWCWAN TAYLOR
SECONDED. There were no objections, the motion carried
and was so ordered by Mayor Bloxham.
00-
Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated that the
Council had received his written report on Weed Abatement
Procedure in the August 21, 1963 Agenda material. He
suggested that the City could use the Government Code to
enforce Weed control; that he had discussed the problem
with oth cities and reoei•ved i nformat l on; tint the City
Rtbh*
August 27, 1963
Page 5
RE EXCESS FLOOD
CONTROL PROPERTY
ALONG BIG DALTON
WASH
REQUEST OF JAMES
FLOE, ROSEGLEN
CONSTRUCTION CO.
RE EXCESS FLOOD
CONTROL PROPERTY
BILL NORRIS REPRE-
SENTING ROSEGLEN
MOTION MADE TO
CONCUR WITH C.A.O.
RECOMMENDATION AND
WRITE LETTER RE-
LINQUISHING PROPERTY
DISCUSSION
MOTION WITHDRAWN
MOTION MADE TO
TABLE UNTIL NEXT
REG. MTG. SO C.A.O.
AND ATTY. CAN CHECK
FURTHER
WEED ABATEMENT
DISCUSSION
BIB]
39561-U01
1963-U02
08-U02
27-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO115492-U03
DO116777-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
4/22/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1963 08 27 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— + ŸÍ«1342 Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council
could be divided and part of it be contracted; that Mr.
Palmer has been checking and giving the County the informa-
tion.
Mayor Bloxham stated that he was very satisfied with the
weed abatement that has been done on his property.
Chief Parsons of the Los Angeles County Fire Department
explained that upon the request of the City the fire
department would go into the rear of properties; that
the work could be performed more effectively when there
is good coordination between the City and the department;
that the property owner was responsible for the parkways;
that property is declared in the months of January and
February and posted by the Weed Abatement Service, and
if not complied with then the County will come in and re-
move the weeds.
Discussion followed.
COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL INSTRUCT
THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER TO PURSUE THIS VJEED
ABATEMENT PROGRAM AS FAR AS THE LEGALITY IS CONCERNED
IN THE BEST AND QUICKEST METHOD THAT HE KNONS HON IN
CONJUNCTION WITH THE WEED ABATEMENT PROGRAM: START
THE PROGRAM AND COME TO SOME FINAL DECISION AND ALSO
CLEAN UP THE SHRUBBERY ON CORNERS AND BY DRIVEWAYS.
COUNCILMAN BISHOP SECONDED. There were no objections,
the motion carried and was so ordered by Mayor Bloxham.
00-
Mr. Nordby recommended that Officer Steele's attendance at
the Delinquency Control Institute, University of Southern
California be approved. A $750.00 scholarship has been
obtained for Officer Steele and other expenses would be
borne by the State Special Police Training Fund.
COUNCILMAN BISHOP MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CONCUR
WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER AND OFFICER STEELE BE GRANTED PERMISSION TO
ATTEND THE DELINQUENCY CONTROL INSTITUTE. COUNCIU0AN
MOREHEAD SECONDED. There were no objections, the
motion carried and was so ordered by Mayor Bloxham.
00-
Mr. Nordby explained specifications have been prepared
calling for bids to replace the 1962 Plymouth black and
white patrol units with 1964 model sedans. Bid opening
date has been set for October 3, 1963; automatic trans-
missions have been included as an alternate bid. There
was no action taken.
00-
Mr. Nordby said tickets had been received for the Sixth
Annual Fire Fighters Sall at the Palladium featuring
Lawrence Welk and were available in his office.
00-
A written recommendation from Assistant City Engineer
Welch on a later Cooler for the Public Works Department
was included in the August 21, 1963 agenda and was now
considered by the Council.
August 27, 1963
Page 6
CHIEF PARSONS
DISCUSSION
MOTION MADE AND
CARRIED THAT CITY
COUNCIL INSTRUCT
C.A.O. TO PURSUE
WEED ABATEMENT PRO-
GRAM AS FAR AS
LEGALITY 15 CON--
CERN® START PROGRAM
AND ALSO CLEAN UP
SHRUBBERY ON CORNERS
AND BY DRIVEWAYS
C A 0. RECOMMENDA-
TION RE OFFICER
STEEL E ATTENDING
DELINQUENCY CONTROL
INSTITUTE
MOTION MADE AND
CARRIED GRANTING
PERMISSION TO OFFI-
CER STEELE TO ATTEND
DELINQUENCY CONTROL
INSTITUTE
INFORMATION RE
SPECS. ON POL ICE
PATROL UNITS
BID OPENING OCT.
3. 1963
INFORMATION RE FORE
FIGHTERS BALL
RECOMMENDATION
RE WATER COOLER
PUB. WORKS DEPT.
Continued)
BIB]
39561-U01
1963-U02
08-U02
27-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO115492-U03
DO116777-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
4/22/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1963 08 27 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— + ŸÍ«1343
I
Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council
COUNCILMAN BISHOP MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CONCUR
WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER
AND INSTALL FOR THE CITY CRBNS A GENERAL ELECTRIC WATER
COOLER, MODEL RSA-6 AT A COST OF $159.00 INCLUDING A
ONE YEAR WARRANTY ON PARTS AND LABOR FOR $7.00, PLUS
SALES TAX. COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR SECONDED. The motion
carried by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN BISHOP, TAYLOR, MOREHEAD
AND MAYOR BLOXHAM
NOES NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMAN HOLMES
00-
Planning Director Kalbfleisch explained that City Engineer
Young had information regarding Lot Split No. 544, but as
Mr. Young was out of the Council Chambers for a few minutes
the Council took up other business.
00-
There was discussion by the Council regarding attendance
at the League of California Cities Meeting in San Francisco
and the method of handling appropriations.
COUNCILMAN BISHOP MOVED THAT A MAXIMUM AMCU NT NOT TO EX-
CEED $200.00 FOR HOTEL, MEALS AND TRANSPORTATION BE
ESTABLISHED FOR EACH ONE ATTENDING THIS AMOUNT WOULD
EXCLUDE THE REGISTRATION FEE. CCU NCILMAN MOREHEAD
SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN BISHOP, MOREHEAD, TAYLOR
AND MAYOR BLOXHAM
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMAN HOLMES
00-
At this time, City Engineer Young returned to the Council
Chambers and explained that under Section 9307 of the
Municipal Code the City Engineer is to make a report on
lot splits to the Planning Commission which he had done
on Lot Split Case No. 544 $DeMarco), however the Planning
Commission did not agree with the report. He explained
that he used this case only as an example as to how, with
proper planning the area could be better developed by
combining property and then splitting. Mr Young indicated
that the Planning Commission did not feel that the City
could deny a property owner the right to develop his ground,
however developers are using the Lot Split Ordinance as a
method of developing and circumventing the Subdivision
Ordinance and Land Map Act. The subdivider does this by
lot splitting into four parcels and then coming back the
following year and requesting three more parcels; making
a total of six parcels. He explained that if this area
were properly developed it would make a fine subdivision,
he presented a map showing how the area could be developed
by eliminating land lines and rearranging and planning as
a subdivision. This would increase land values regardless
of the size of the lots; that individual development results
in poor planning.
Mr. Young suggested in the future that the Lot Split Ordinance
be reviewed with certain requirements for lot sizes, houses,
streets, etc.
Discussion followed.
fContInued)
August 27, 1963
Page 7
MOTION MADE AND
CARRIED TO INSTALL
FOR CITY CRBBNS A
GENERAL ELECTRIC
WATER COOLER
LOT SPLIT NO. 544
LEAGUE OF CALIF.
CITI ES
MDT I ON MADE AND
CARRIED THAT $200.00
MAXIMUM BE ESTABLISH
FOR EACH ONE ATTEND-
ING
RE LOT SPLIT ORD.
AND L.S. NOS. 544,
561 AND 563
BIB]
39561-U01
1963-U02
08-U02
27-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO115492-U03
DO116777-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
4/22/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1963 08 27 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— + ŸÍ«1 44Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council
Mr. Kalbfeisch stated that an adequate Lot Split Ordinance
would make for much better development throughout the City.
Further discussion followed regarding Lot Split Case No.
544; the possibility of this lot split being resplit at
a future time. This method of development increases the
City's engineering, designing, grading, drainage costs and
installation of improvements. Improvements should be made
at the time property is developed, also there are improve-
ment problems when part of a lot split property changes
hands.
City Attorney Flandrick suggested that a proper ordinance
would correct some of the problems on lot splits; he stated
that at the present time there are problems with regard
to improvement agreements with change of ownership; that
possibly owners could get together with others in the area
and develop under the 1903 or 1911 acts; that the fire
department encounters problems as a result of many lot
split developments.
Discussion by Council followed regarding slower develop-
ment under such a procedure.
COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT LOT SPLIT NOS. 544, 551 ARID
563 BE HELD OVER UNTIL THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCIL, SEPTEMBER 18, AND INSTRUCT THE CITY
ATTORNEY TO BRING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL A REVISED LOT
SPLIT ORDINANCE ALONG THE LINES DISCUSSED. COUNCILMAN
BISHOP SECONDED. There were no objections the motion
carried and was so ordered by Mayor Bloxham.
00-
At 9:40 p.m. Mayor Bloxham stated that as the consultants
for the Sewer District were present the brochure for
District No. 2 would be discussed.
Mr. Schreiner read the proposed brochure with various
changes being made. He stated the brochure would accompany
the notices of assessment to property owners in Sewer
District 62-A-1.
The following changes were discussed:
Section 4 a), Line 3, following the word requirements, the
words wi I I be made" were added.
Section 5 a) Line 4, 6 inch" was deleted and Line 5,
21 inch" was changed to 18 inch". Section 5 b) add
prior to" the hearing.
Section 6 b) was discussed at length; the design engineer
was asked what the contingency factor should be in the
estimated assessment in order that the figure of $9.52 per
running foot could be reduced; that this was high and could
be protested; that the 5% construction contingency and the
5% bond discount were high. The method of assessing
publicly owned property such as schools, parks, city property
county property and districts, eft. was discussed. It was
stated that there are about 160 acres of school property
in district No. 2. Inquiry was made as to what would happen
if the public entity did not pay within the thirty day period,
wherein the assessment engineer explained that in one instance
the City paid, however they were paid back in five years.
There was further discussion that all property should be
assessed equally and the average property oymer should not
be carrying the load for large land areas.
August 27, 1963
Page 8
MOTION MADE THAT
LOT SPLIT NOS. 544,
551 AND 563 BE HELD
OVER UNTIL THE NEXT
REG. MUG. OF THE C IT'
COUNCIL, SEPT. 18,
AND INSTRUCT CITY
ATTY. TO BRING BEFOR
THE COUNCIL A REVISE
LOT SPLIT ORD. ALONG
THE LINES DISCUSSED
wocw E 62-A-1
Continued)
BIB]
39561-U01
1963-U02
08-U02
27-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO115492-U03
DO116777-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
4/22/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1963 08 27 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— + Ÿ Í«I
Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council
COUNCILMAN BISHOP MOVED THAT THE ASSESSMENTS IN DISTRICT
NO. 2 BE SET UP IN A MANNER THAT ALL PROPERTY WILL PAY
EQUAL ASSESSMENTS. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD SECOND®.
Discussion followed.
With the consent of the second, Councilman Bishop requested
that Mr. Schreiner reword the motion.
The motion was as follows:
COUNCILMAN BISHOP MOWED THAT NO PROPERTY SHALL BE ASSESSED
DIFFERENTLY FROM OTHER PROPERTY SOLELY BY VIRTUE OF ITS
PRESENT CURRENT USE OR QWNERSHIP. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD
SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMAN BISHOP, MOREHEAD,
TAYLOR AND MAYOR BL(XHAM
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMAN HOLMES
Section 7, second to the last line change will" to may".
Section 8, 2), change the first sentence to read bearing
annual interest set by lowest responsible bid". Under
Section 8 b) stress the fact that any assessment under
$50.00 must be paid in cash.
Discussion followed as to the use of 1911 or 1913 Act;
wherein Mr. Schreiner explained that a different procedure
is used for each; that the assessment spread as made by
the assessment engineer on District No. 2 would be useless
under a 1911 Act under which the work is performed and then
the assessment is spread. The concensus of opinion was
that the 1913 Act be used.
Mr. Rosetti informed Council that he would correct the
brochure and return a draft to the Council before the
mailing.
Mr. Schreiner said the next item on the agenda for final
organizational meeting for Sewer District 62-A-1 was
final consideration of cost estimates together with
contingency factor and bond discount factor. He stated
in the last district the cost estimates were developed
for the construction costs and incidental expenses and
included within those was provision for a potential
five percent 5%) bond discount, and a five percent
5%) contingency factor for increase cost of the work;
that he was aware of the fact that the cost estimates
and the footage of District No. 2 were higher than
District No. 1; that as the Council could see from the
brochure the total estimate was 24 million dollars and
the front footage cost was estimated at $9.52 per front
foot exclusive of the house lateral. He asked Mr.
Rosetti If the could give a rough calculation as to how
the change in the assessment of school property would
affect the front footage cost.
Mr. Rosetti stated it would lower it some but would not be
too significant.
Discussion followed that there were twenty-six 26) miles
of mainline and fifteen 15) miles of laterals in District
No. 2.
Councilman Bishop indicated in order to bring the cost down)
he did not think that District No. 2 should have a five
percent 5%) bond discount.
Continued)
August 27, 1963
Page 9
MOTION MADE
MOTION REWORDED
MOTION MADE AND
CARRIED THAT NO
PROPERTY SHALL BE
ASSESSED DIFFERENTLI
FRAM OTHER PROPERTY
SOLELY BY VIRTUE OF
ITS PRESENT CURRENT
USE OR OWNERSHIP
BIB]
39561-U01
1963-U02
08-U02
27-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO115492-U03
DO116777-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
4/22/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1963 08 27 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— + Ÿ
Í«1346 Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council
Mr. W. R. Kolberg pointed out the City was very fortunate
that the contractor stayed on District No. I because the
contractor was held up for approximately one year; that
in addition to that there were two labor increases during
that time; that as it turned out the bond discount was not
used but it should be left in.
Mayor Bloxham asked where the big difference was in the
price between District No. I and District No. 2.
Mr. James Sims stated a ten to twelve percent labor increase
was figured; that there would be an increased material
cost; that the contractors would be taking into considera-
tion the delay on District No.leven though it was hoped
that there would not be a delay on District No. 2 but this
was a possibility.
Mr. Rosetti pointed out that the night before the public
hearing the bids would be in and it would be known what
the actual assessment would be,
Further discussion followed concerning the bond discount
wherein Mr. Kolberg stated the bond discount was only
used, for most practicable purposes, to reduce the net
interest cost.
Mr. Schreiner suggested if the Council wanted to delete
from the cost estimate the contingency factor of five
5%), the Council should ask Mr. Sims whether he felt
this could be done and still get a workable job out of
it with the money that would be assessed; and if the
Council desired to delete the bond'discount of five
percent 5%), it would be proper to request Mr. Kolberg
to get an opinion from his San Francisco office as to
whether or not the bonds would then be marketable and
what the risk of them not being marketable would be;
and upon that make the final cost estimate.
Mr. Sims stated he did believe further investigation was
needed; that at this time he would say that it looked
very possible that the contingency factor could be dropped.
In answer to a question by City Clerk Balkus, Mr. Sims
stated there would be large diameter pipe used In the main
line and there would more main line used in District No.
2 than in District No. I; that there had been an increase
in pipe cost.
The Council concurred with the recommendation of Mr. Sims_
and Mr. Schreiner that Mr. Kolberg obtain an opinion from
the San Francisco office regarding the deletion of the
bond discount and that Mr. Sims obtain an opinion from
Ivor Lyons and Associates regarding d!l1etion of the
contingency factor.
Mr. Schreiner said the next item on the agenda for the final
organizational meeting for Sewer District No. 62-A-1 was
the final consideration of plans, line locations, easements,
number of house laterals, and lines on private streets.
He stated that some time ago the City Attorney had met
with the Engineer of Work, Assessment Engineer and himself
to go over the location of the lines and easements; that
there had been some changes made at that time; that severe)
of the lines had been relocated out into the public right-
of-way from parkways.
Mr. Sims stated this was correct; that the entire Baldwin
Park Boulevard line was redesigned as well as areas along
Olive) and the main line was now in the center of the street;
that approximately $28,000.00 was saved by putting the
trunk line in the center rather than down both sides; that
the two ten 10) inch lines were replaced with one twelve
August 27, 1963
Page 10
COUNCIL INSTRUCTION
NEXT ITEM
FINAL CONSIDERATION
OF PLANS, LINE
LOCATIONS, EASEMENTS
NUMBER OF HOUSE
LATERALS, LINES ON
PRIVATE STREETS,
ETC.
Continued)
BIB]
39561-U01
1963-U02
08-U02
27-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO115492-U03
DO116777-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
4/22/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1963 08 27 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— + ŸÍ«Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council August 27, 1963
Page 11
1347
12) inch fine; that there were water lines that interfered
with the location of the lines at the curbs. He brought
out that some fourteen 14) laterals were dropped and re-
placed with manholes which brought up the cost, and also
there was considerable increase in cost by changing the
four 4) inch laterals to six 6) inch laterals which
represented approximately 85,000 lineal foot of six 6)
inch line; that Mr. Lampman had requested approximately
4,000 feet of twenty-one inch sewer and this had been
reduced to an eighteen 18) inch diameter which was a
little savings.
I
I
Mr. Schreiner asked if the Council had taken the position RE SEWERS IN PRIVATE
of sewering the entire district including all private streets. STREETS
Mayor Bloxham stated this was right but those who were on
private streets and did not want sewers would be bypassed.
The Council again instructed the Chief Administrative COUNCIL INSTRUCTION
Officer to'bring back a report as to how many private
streets were involved and how many did or did not want
the sewers.
Mr. Rosetti stated there were sixty-one 61) houses on 61 HOUSES ON PRIVATE
private streets. STREETS
Discussion-followed that all of the property owners on a
private street had to agree to have sewers or the sewer
would not be put in.
Mr. Schreiner stated the next item on the agenda for the NEXT ITEM
final organizational meeting for Sewer District No. 62-A-I FINAL CONSIDERATION
was final consideration of Assessment Roll and Diagram, OF ASSESSMENT ROLL
extent of district property descriptions and lot ties. AND DIAGRAM, EXTENT
He stated he had completed examination of the various items OF DISTRICT PROPERTY
that had been submitted to them, and aside from a few DESCRIPTIONS, LOT
technical changes, they felt the Assessment Roll and TIES ETC.
Diagram were in good shape; that there was some talk
at one point about altering the extent of the Assess-
ment District to include more territory, and he asked if
any decision had been reached on that.
City Engineer Young stated, in his opinion, the boundary
lines should not be changed.
Mr. Schreiner stated that there was a problem involving
inconsistency in City records and records of the County
Assessor; that there was a desire of the City to issue
a bond on every separate parcel of property in the Assess-
ment District, and frequently where a lot split or sub-
division had been authorized by the City Council nothing
appeared on the County records; that there was a situation
where the Assessment Diagram showed certain lot splits which
had taken place but no corresponding lot split shown on the
County records; that the financial consultant in preparing
his prospectus for the bond sale had to put down each
unpaid assessment, the amount of the assessment and the
assessed value of the land so that the prospective bidders
could make an analysis of what proportion of the
assessment the assessed valuation of the land was; that
where there was a situation of having two or three assess-
ments assessed as one parcel by the County it did lead to
a rather confusing development; that for that reason there
had been quite a problem with the Assessment Diagram.
Mr. Kolberg stated he had run across numerous cuts where
there were 5-8-10-12 foot slivers fifty 50) foot by
one hundred 100) foot deep receiving a separate parcel
number, getting a separate assessment, getting a frontage
benefit and an area benefit; that in many instances they
came up with a bond of $62.00 or $63.00; that they could
Continued)
BIB]
39561-U01
1963-U02
08-U02
27-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO115492-U03
DO116777-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
4/22/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1963 08 27 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— + Ÿ
1963 08 27 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— + Ÿ
Í«Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council
Mr. Schreiner stated the next item on the agenda for the
final organization meeting for Sewer District No. 62-A-i
was the establishment of a time schedule for Initiation
of proceedings. He stated there were several things that
had to go on before the proceedings could actually be
initiated; that the Resolution of Intention must state
the work that was to be done and this of course, would
include any private streets on which lines would be
waived; also that the answer to the other item requested
this evening would have to be obtained before any official
action could be taken.
Mr. Rosetti stated it would take them approximately one
week to bring the Assessmen+ Rol: and Diagram up to date
with all of the changes recommended; that at that time
they would respread the assessment reflecting the changes
recommended.
City Engineer Young stated he thought the canvass of the
private streets could be completed by Monday.
Mr. Schreiner stated from the assurances from the persons
involved he could see no reason why this proceeding could
not be started on September 18, 1963, the second regular
meeting in September.
The Council instructed Mr. Kolberg to contact Mr. Rosetti
concerning the bond discount opinion.
The Council also instructed to delete these items" bond
discount and contingency) wherever possible; that the
Council wished as low a figure as possible.
00-
City Attorney Flandrick stated the first item under
Unfinished Business was Z-158, an application for a zone
change from A-1, P, and C-2 to R-3 at 13310 and 13312
Ramona Boulevard, Bill Howard, applicant. He stated at
the last regular meeting the owner of the property
requested a dismissal of the matter and it was suggested
at the time that ownership be verified; that he now had
a written affidavit; that it was apparently a situation
where the owner had teunineted his arrangement with the
potential subdivider.
The Council directed the City Attorney to prepare a
resolution of denial of Z-158.
00-
City Clerk Balkus read Ordinance No. 295 by title as
follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 295
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF SAID CITY
AND REZONING CERTAIN HEREIN DESCRIBED
PROPERTY ZONE CASE NO. Z-180)"
COUNCILMAN BISHOP MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 295 PASS SECOND
READING AND BE ADOPTED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED.
COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD SECONDED. The motion carried by the
following vote:
August 27, 1963
Page 13
NEXT ITEM
EST. OF TIME
SCHEDULE FOR
INITIATION OF PRO-
CEEDINGS
RES. OF INTENTION
POSSIBLY SEPT. 18,
1963
COUNCIL INSTRUCTION
COUNCIL INSTRUCTION
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Z-158, APPLICATION
FOR ZONE CHANGE FROM
A-I, P, AND C-2 TO
R-3 AT 13310 AND
13312 RAMONA BLVD.,
BILL HONARD
COUNCIL INSTRUCTION
CITY ATTY. TO PRE-
PARE RES. OF DENIAL
ORD. NO. 295
AMENDING ZONING MAP
CF SAID CITY AND RE-
ZONING CERTAIN HERE-
IN DESCRIBED PROPERT
ZONE CASE NO. Z-I80
ORD. NO. 295
PASSED SECOND READ-
ING AND BE ADOPTED
AND FURTHER READING
BE WAIVED
AYES: COUNCILMEN BISHOP,, MOREHEAD, TAYLOR
AND MAYOR BLOXHAM
NOES NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMAN HOLMES
00-
BIB]
39561-U01
1963-U02
08-U02
27-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO115492-U03
DO116777-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
4/22/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1963 08 27 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— + ŸÍ«Adjourned Regular MeE$ thg tf the Baldwin Park City Counc i l
City Clerk Bai4us read Ordinance No. 291 by title as
follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 291
AN OR7? NOF OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE C d Y C" \LCW I N Pt AMENDING
THE Cr SA'L. CITY AND RE-
ZONING i j D~:.''C.2?EED PROPERTY FROM
ZONE R-I TO P3 i ENE CASE NO. Z-177)"
CCUNCL W MO LEAD MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 291 PASS
SECOND REEAOING AND BE ADOPTED AND FURTHER READING BE
WAIVED. CCUNC.U;.WOMAN TAYLOR SECONDED. The motion
carri by the foI towi ng vote:
AYES:
NOES
ABSENT:
August 27, 1963
Page 14
ORD. NO. 291
AMENDING ZONING MAP
OF SAID CITY AND RE-
ZONING CERTAIN DES-
CRIBED PROPERTY FRQ
ZONE R-I TO PB ZONE
CASE NO. Z-177)
ORD. NO. 291
PASSED SECOND READ-
ING AND BE ADOPTED
AND FURTHER READING
BE WAIVED
COUNCILMEN MOREHEAD, TAYLOR, BISHOP,
AND MAYOR BLOXHAM
NONE
COUNCILMAN HOLMES
00-
City Clerk Ba4ws read Ordinance No. 296 by title as ORD. NO. 296
fo l kows: APPROVING THE ANNEXA
ORDINANCE NO. 296
TION TO, INCORPORA-
TING IN AND MAKING
A PART OF SAID CITY,
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF CERTAIN UNINHABITED
THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK APPROVING TERRITORY OUTSIDE
THE ANNEXATION TO, INCORPORATING IN THE SAID CITY AND
AND MAKING A PART OF SAID CITY, CERTAIN CONTIGUOUS THERETO,
UNINHABITED TERRITORY OUTSIDE THE SAID KNONN AS ANNEXATION
CITY AND CONTIGUOUS THERETO, KNOWN AS NO. 13
ANNEXATION NO. 13"
COUNCIU110 AN TAYLOR MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 296 PASS
SECOND READING AND BE ADOPTED AND FURTHER READING BE
WAIVED. COUNCILMAN BISHOP SECONDED. The motion carried
by the fo.j'Jowing vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN TAYLOR, BISHOP,
MOREHEAD AND MAYOR BLOXHAM
NOES NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMAN HOLMES
00-
City Clerk Balkus read Ordinance No. 297 by title as
follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 297
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK APPROVING THE
ANNEXATION TO, INCORPORATING IN AND
MAKING A PART OF SAID CITY, CERTAIN
UNINHABITED TERRITORY OUTSIDE THE SAID
CITY AND CONTIGUOUS THERETO, KNOWN AS
ANNEXATION NO. 14"
COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 297 PASS
SECOND READING AND BE ADOPTED AND FURTHER READING BE
WAIVED. COUNCILMAN BISHOP SECONDED. The motion carried
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN MOREHEAD, BISHOP,
TAYLOR AND MAYOR BLOXHAM
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMAN HOLMES
ORD. NO. 296
PASSED SECOND READ-
ING AND BE ADOPTED
AND FURTHER READING
BE WAIVED
ORD. NO. 297
APPROVING THE ANNEXA-
TION TO, INCORPORA-
TING IN AND MAKING
A PART OF SAID CITY,
CERTAIN UNINHABITED
TERRITORY OUTSIDE THE
SAID CITY AND
CONTIGUOUS THERETO,
KNONN AS ANNEXATION
NO. 14
ORD. NO. 297
PASSED SECOND READ-
ING AND BE ADOPTED
AND FURTHER READING
BE WAIVED
BIB]
39561-U01
1963-U02
08-U02
27-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO115492-U03
DO116777-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
4/22/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1963 08 27 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— + ŸÍ«Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council August 27, 1963
Page 15
City Clerk Balkus read Ordinance No. 298 by title as
follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 298
1
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK APPROVING THE
ANNEXATION TO, INCORPORATING IN AND
MAKING A PART OF SAID CITY, CERTAIN
UNINHABITED TERRITORY OUTSIDE THE SAID
CITY AND CONTIGUOUS THERETO, KNOIIN AS
ANNEXATION NO. 15"
COUNCILMAN BISHOP MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 298 PASS
SECOND READING AND BE ADOPTED AND FURTHER READING BE
WAIVED. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD SECONDED. The motion
carried by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN BISHOP, MOREHEAD,
TAYLOR AND MAYOR BLOXHAM
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMAN HOLMES
00-
City Attorney Flandrick stated there was a report from REPORT FROM P.C.
the Planning Commission making certain recommendations MAKING CERTAIN
regarding Z-178 before each member of the Council; that RECOMMENDATIONS RE
each member of the Council had a copy of this ordinance. Z-178
Discussion followed wherein the time in Sections 9120.36 and
9120.391 was changed to twenty 20) days.
entitled:
City Clerk Balkus read in full urgency Ordinance No. 294 ORD. NO. 294
ORDINANCE NO. 294
1351
ORD. NO. 298
APPROVING THE ANNEXA
TION TO, INCORPORA-
TING IN AND MAKING
A PART OF SAID CITY,
CERTAIN UNINHABITED
TERRITORY OUTSIDE T
SAID CITY AND
CONTIGUOUS THERETO,
KNOWN AS ANNEXATION
NO. 15
ORD. NO. 298
PASSED SECOND READ-
ING AND BE ADOPTED
AND FURTHER READING
BE WAIVED
AMENDING SECTIONS
9120, 9120.11, 9120.
9120.21, 9120.22,
9120.32, 9120.33,
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 9120.34, 9120.36,
THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING 9120.361, 9120.38,
SECTIONS 9120, 9120.11, 9120.2, 9120.21, 9120.391, 9120.392,
9120.22, 9120.32, 9120.33, 9120.34, 9120.4 AN D 9120.41
9120.36, 9120,361, 9120.38, 9120.391, OF THE B.P.M.C.;
9120.392, 9120.4 AND 9120.41 OF THE AND REPEALING SECTI(
BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE; AND RE- 9120.1, 9120.37,
PEALING SECTIONS 9120.1, 9120.37, 9120.371, 9120.371, 9120.39,
9120.39, 9121.9 AND 9121.91 OF SAID 9121.9 AND 9121.91
CODE, RELATING TO ZONE VARIANCES, CONDI- OF SAID CODE, RE-
TIONAL USE PERMITS, AND MASTER PLAN LATING TO ZONE VARI-
AMENDMENTS Z-178) URGENCY ORDINANCE)" ANCES, CONDITIONAL
I COUNCILMAN BISHOP MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 294 BE ADOPTED,
COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD SECONDED. The motion carried by the
folloning vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN BISHOP, MOREHEAD,
TAYLOR AND MAYOR &((HAM
NOES NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMAN HOLMES
00-
City Clerk Balkus read Ordinance No. 301 by title as
follows:
USE PERMITS, AND
MASTER PLAN AMEND-
MENTS Z-I78)
URGENCY ORDINANCE)
ORD. NO. 294
ADOPTED
ORD. NO. 301
AMENDING SECTIONS
Continued) ICont i nued)
BIB]
39561-U01
1963-U02
08-U02
27-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO115492-U03
DO116777-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
4/22/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1963 08 27 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— + ŸÍ«Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council
ORDINANCE NO. 301
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING
SECTIONS 9120, 9120.11, 9120.2, 9120.21,
9120.22, 9120.32, 9120.33, 9120.34,
9120.36, 9120.361, 9120.38, 9120.391,
9120.392, 9120.4 AND 9120.41 OF THE
BALDWIN PARK NUNICIPAL CODE; AND RE-
PEALING SECTIONS 9120.1 9120.37, 9120.371,
9120.39, 9121.9 AND 9121.91 OF SAID
CODE, RELATING TO ZONE VARIANCES, CONDI-
TIONAL USE PERMITS, AND MASTER PLAN
AMENDMENTS tZ-178)"
COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 301 PASS
FIRST READING AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN
BISHOP SECONDED. The motion carried by the following
vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN MOREHEAD, BISHOP,
TAYLOR AND MAYOR BLOXHAM
NOES NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMAN HOLMES
00-
City Clerk Balkus read Resolution No. 63-115 by title
as follows:
RESOLUTION NO. 63-115
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ESTABLISHING
FEES FOR THE USE OF THE BALDWIN PARK
MUNICIPAL AUDITORIUM"
COUNCILMAN BISHOP MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO, 63-115 BE
APPROVED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILWOMAN
TAYLOR SECONDED. The motion carried by the following
vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN BISHOP, TAYLOR,
MOREHEAD AND MAYOR BLOXHAM
NOES NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMAN HOLMES
00-
City Clerk Balkus read Resolution No. 63-117 by title as
follows:
RESOLUTION NO. 63-1 17
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL CF
THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ALLOWING
CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY
OF BALDWIN PARK"
COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 63-117 BE
APPROVED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN
MOREHEAD SECONDED. The motion carried by the following
vote
August 27, 1963
Page 16
9120, 9120.11, 9120.
9120.21, 9120.22,
9120.32, 9120.33,
9120.34, 9120.36,
9120.361, 9120.38,
9120.391, 9120.392,
9120.4 AND 9120.41
OF THE B.P.M.C.;
AND REPEALING SECTIC
9120.1, 9120.37,
9120.371, 9120.39,
9121.9 AND 9121.91
OF SAID CODE, RE-
LATING TO ZONE VARI-
ANCES, CONDITIONAL
USE PERMITS, AND
MASTER PLAN AMEND-
MENTS Z-178)
ORD. NO. 301
PASSED FIRST READ-
ING AND FURTHER
READING BE WAIVED
RES. NO. 63-115
ESTABLISHING FEES
FOR THE USE OF THE
B. PK. MUNICIPAL
AUDITORIUM
RES. NO. 63-115
APPROVED AND FURTHEF
READING BE WAIVED
RES. NO. 63-117
ALLOWING CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS AGAINST CITY
OF B.PK.
GENERAL CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS NOS. 3286-
3415 INCL.
PAYROLL CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS NOS. 2358-
2464 INCL.
RES. NO. 63-1 17
APPROVED AND FURTHER
READING BE WAIVED
Continued)
BIB]
39561-U01
1963-U02
08-U02
27-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO115492-U03
DO116777-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
4/22/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1963 08 27 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— + ŸÍ«1353
I
I
Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council
AYES: COUNCILMEN TAYLOR, MOREHEAD,
BISHOP AND MAYOR BLOXHAM
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMAN HOLMES
00-
City Attorney Flandrick stated that Council had had be-
fore them several weeks ago the proposal in connection
with the City of Baldwin Park vs. Chez, Baldwin Park
Boulevard widening project, concerning the settlement
of some of the parcels involved; that there were two
separate matters before the Council, one involving
four parcels, the figures on which had been accepted
pursuant to the Council's instructions and those four
parcels were settled; that there was one other matter,
Parcel 6, Mr. and Mrs. Mathewson at 3216 Baldwin Park
Boulevard, in which there was a problem in that the street
widening project and the right-of-way to be acquired
would have taken some two or three feet off of their
dining room, and the home being forty 40) years old there
was a problem as far as evaluation; that the first
appraisal was set at $3950.00 and the second appraisal was
$4,929.00; that the matter was set for trial on August 28,
1963; that Mr. Nordby and he had gone out, with the
attorney's permission, and talked to Mrs. Mathewson this
afternoon and Mr. Mathewson was here this evening; that
as a possibility Mr. and Mrs. Mathewson had discussed
offering $2500.00 in lieu of the $5,000.00 earlier
authorized by the Council providing that they were per-
mitted to retain the present location of their house,
two 2) feet into the parkway area, for a period of
not to exceed five 5) years at the maximum or if there
was any zone change on the property they would auto-
matically remove it or if there was a sale of the
property it would automatically be removed; that the
removal would be at their cost; that if this was satis-
factory to the Council, and this was recommended by
City Engineer Young, Chief Administrative Officer Nordby
and himself, the settlement could be made.
Discussion followed that this property was the third lot
on the east side of the street north from Francisquito;
that there was to be no sidewalk improvement at this time
and the curb line would be seven or eight feet from the
structure; that the structure would have to be removed if
the zone change was to C-I or a higher use.
COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT PARCEL 6 IN THE CITY OF
BALD41N PARK VS. CHEZ, MR. AND MRS. MATHBWSON, THAT THE
SETTLEMENT OFFER MADE BY THEM BE ACCEPTED IN THE AMOUNT
OF $2500.00 WITH THE CONDITIONS IN EITHER THE JUDGMENT
OR A SEPARATE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THE
TWO FOOT ENCROACHMENT OF THE HOUSE BE PERMITTED FOR A
PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS AT THE MAXIMUM OR THAT
THAT RIGHT BE TERMINATED IF THERE I S A ZONE CHANGE TO
C-I ZONING OR HIGHER OR IF THE PROPERTY IS SOW OR tF THE
PROPERTY IS DESTROYED WHOLLY OR IN PART THAT THEY WILL
REMOVE THE EXISTING STRUCTURES. COUNCILV40MAN TAYLOR
SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN MOREHEAD, TAYLOR,
BISHOP, AND MAYOR BLCDXHAM
NOES NONE
ABSENT COUHCLLWAN I-IOLNES
Coat in&,ed 1
August 27, 1963
Page 17
RE LITIGATION
CITY OF B.PK. VS.
CHE Z
PARCEL 6
MR. AND IRS.
MATHEWSON, 3216
B.Pk. Blvd.
MOTION MADE AND
CARRIED THAT PARCEL
6, IN CITY OF B.PK.
VS. CHEZ, MR. AND
MRS. MATHBWSON, THAT
SETTLEMENT OFFER MAD-
BY THEM BE ACCEPTED
IN AMT. OF $2500.00
WITH CONDITIONS IN
EITHER THE JUDGMENT
OR A SEPARATE AGREE-
MENT WITH THE CITY
COUNCIL THAT THE TWO
FOOT ENCROACHMENT OF
THE HOUSE BE PERMITTE!
FOR A PERIOD NOT TO
EXCEED FIVE YEARS AT
BIB]
39561-U01
1963-U02
08-U02
27-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO115492-U03
DO116777-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
4/22/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1963 08 27 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— + ŸÍ«Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council August 27, 1963
Page 18
THE MAXIMUM OR THAT
THAT RIGHT BE
TERMINATE) IF THERE
IS A ZONE CHANGE TO
C-1 ZONING OR HIGHEL
OF IF THE PROP ERFY
IS SOLD OR IF THE
PROPERTY IS DESTROY[
WHOLLY OR IN PART T!-
THEY WILL REMOVE
THE EXISTING STRJCT.
00-
Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated that Mr. ASSIGNMENT FROM IVOR
Sims before he left handed him an assignment from Ivor LYONS TO SECURITY
Lyons to Security First National Bank to the extent FIRST NAT'L BANK
of $15,000.00; that this did not require any Council $15,000
action. 62-A-I
00-
Councilwoman Taylor asked how the plans were coming on the RE VAULT PLANS
vault.
Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated that City Engineer
Young was concentrating on the sewer district but was
working on the vault whenever he could.
00-
AT 12:45 A.M. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADJ. 12:45 A.M.
ADJOURN. COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR SECONDED. There were no
objections, the motion carried and was so ordered by Mayor
Bioxham.
00-
THELMA L,. BALIUS, CITY CLIiIRtt
APPROVED: August 18
1965.
Date of Distribution to City Council August 13 1965.
Date of D i s t ri but on to DWartmer4t-s, ugust 16~ 1965.
BIB]
39561-U01
1963-U02
08-U02
27-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO115492-U03
DO116777-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
4/22/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
Í«1348 Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council August 27, 1963
Page 12
not show an assessed value on there because it was
actually shown that they tied into the parcel next door
or part of a piece of property that it shows the total
assessment on, yet there was four or five of these on
one lot; that these would be brought to the attention of
the Assessment and Design Engineer and he would show them
the County records where there was a tie-in of ownership
and ask them to combine these.
City Attorney Flandrick stated this was not a result of
lot splits, it was a result of mistakes in deed descriptions.
Mr. Schreiner stated the reason this point was raised at
this time was to acquaint the Council with the fact that
the situation did exist; that if the Assessment Diagrams
were drawn strictly to conform with the County Diagrams
it would require many divisions of bonds in future years;
that this matter would be worked out by the Engineers
and Financial Consultants.
City Engineer Young brought out where there were lot splits
resulting in two, three and four houses deep, the front
house got the front footage and the area assessment went
to the back properties; that this was, in his opinion, an
unfair distribution.
Mr. Rosetti stated he did not know how a more equitable
spread could be arrived at because the benefits to each
parcel had to be determined; that the benefits to the
rear parcels were not the same as the front parcel.
Mr. Schreiner stated there would be a legal problem in
trying to assess the property behind the abutting
property for a direct benefit from the sewer line with-
out taking the trouble of reviewing the deeds to find
out if there was a right of access and a right of
construction of utility over the front properties to
the back.
City Engineer Young stated he thought under a Revenue
Bond the back parcels would pay the same as the front
parcel.
Mr. Kolberg stated they had to show the assessed value
as one combined lot even though there might be four
splits.
Mr. Rosetti explained that in spreading the assessment
one could not take the assessment that would be spread
on the entire parcel and divide it equally; that the front
parcel would have a line almost to his front door; the
rear parcels had to build a line from the street back
each one proportioned to his distance from the street
line; that the Assessment Engineer had to assess accord-
ing to benefit; that on the Assessment Diagram even if
the lot was divided into three parcels it it was under
one ownership it should be shown as one parcel, not three,
and only one bond.
Mr. Kolberg stated that due to relocating the sewer line
of the private property into the right-of-way on Los
Angeles Street if would require a relocation of the
Assessment District boundaries; that it was a matter
of moving it from the prerty line to the centerline
of the street, a distance of seventy-five 75) to one
hundred 100) feet. He asked if it would require
Council action to make this change.
Mr. Schreiner stated not now but at the time the
Resolution of Intention was adopted,
Continued)
BIB]
39561-U01
1963-U02
08-U02
27-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO115492-U03
DO116777-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
4/22/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06