HomeMy WebLinkAbout1964 02 12 CC MIN1964 02 12 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 5 [ Í«1635
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 12, 1964
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER) 14403 East Pacific Avenue 7:00 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park met in ad-
journed regular session at the above place at 7:00 p.m.
Roll Call: Present: COUNCILMEN BISHOP, HOLMES.. ROLL.CAI.L-
MOREHEAD, TAYLOR AND MAYOR
BLOXHAM
Absent: CHIEF OF POLICE BEST AND CITY
TREASURER PUGH
Also Present: CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER
NORDBY, CITY ATTORNEY FLANDRICK,
CITY ENGINEER YOUNG, ASSISTANT
CITY ENGINEER WELCH, PLANNING
DIRECTOR AND BUILDING SUPERINTENDENT
KALBFLEISCH, FINANCE aIRECTOR DUNCAN
AND CITY CLERK BALKUS
00-
City Clerk Balkus read Resolution No. 64-33 by title as REST NO 64-33
follows: AMEND. AES. NO.
64-23'RE CERTAIN
RESOLUTION NO. 64-33 CLAIMS AND DEM4NDS
AGAINST SAID CITY
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING
RESOLUTION NO. 64-23 RELATING TO CER-
TAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AGAINST SAID
CITY"
City Clerk Balkus explained that this resolution corrected CORRECTING TYPO.
the typographical error which was pointed out on February 5, ERROR
1964, when Resolution No. 64-23 was presented.
COUNCILMAN BISHOP MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 64-33 BE APPROVED RES. NO. 64-33
AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD SECONDED.
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN BISHOP, MOREHEAD, HOLMES,
TAYLOR AND MAYOR BLOXHAM
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
00-
Councilman. Bishop stated that the lot splits should be RE LOT SPLIT PRO-
handled under the old procedure; that the ordinance should CEDURE
be amended to accomplish this.
U Councilman Holmes stated if the matter was handled in the
manner it was intended to be the present ordinance was
satisfactory; that if the situation was not clear enough
and It was going to be a complicated problem to handle,
lot splits should be handled under the original procedure.
Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated he would like to
submit a report to the Council at their next regular meet-
ing clarifying the lot split ordinance.
There was further discussion.
Mayor Bloxham stated at the suggestion of the Chief Adininistr'e-MATTER HELD OVER FQR
tive Officer this matter would be held over to the next REPORT OF C,A.Os QN
regular meeting, February 20, 1964. FEB. 20, 6964
BIB]
39576-U01
1964-U02
02-U02
12-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO115493-U03
DO116799-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
4/24/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1964 02 12 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 5 [ Í«6,
Xdjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council February 12, 1964
Page 2
City Clerk Baikus read Resolution No. 64-34 by title as
follows:
RESOLUTION NO. 64-34
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF BAI_DWIN PARK ALLOWING
CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY
OF BALDW I N PARK"
Discussion followed as to whether or not the H.H.F.A. had
been repaid for 62-A-I.
Mr. Urban J. Schreiner stated he had looked at the check
which was drawn for H,H.F,A.; that it was the proper time
to pay it; that he was not aware of any prior payment.
Finance Director Duncan verified that this payment had not
been made previously.
COUNCILMAN BISHOP MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 64-34 BE
APPROVED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED, COUNCILMAN
MOREHEAD SECONDED. The motion carried by the following
vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN BISHOP, MOREHEAD, HOLMES,
TAYLOR AND MAYOR BLOXHAM
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
00-
City Engineer Young presented Lot Split No. 596, 3251 North
Athol, William F. Berritt, applicant. He stated that the
curbs and gutters were in and the street was improved with
the exception of sidewalks and some driveways. He stated
the applicant was installing sidewalks around Parcel 1;
that the applicant wanted to put sidewalks in front of the
other parcel but wanted to wait until the house was built
so as not to tear up the sidewalk.
He commented further stating that under the present ordinance
the lot splits could not be recorded unless the City
Engineer signed them; that under the old procedure lot
splits could only be recorded as pieces of ground as they
were sold.
He stated his recommendation was these people be permitted
to build; and install sidewalks at later date) that under
the lot split ordinance he could not accept the deposit
for the sidewalks that were to be constructed.
COUNCILMAN BISHOP MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CONCUR WITH
THE CITY ENGINEER AND APPROVE LOT SPLIT NO. 596.
City Engineer Young stated,in explanation, that he would
accept the deposit; that the applicant would be given a
building permit; that after the house was built, sidewalks
were in and affidavit signed the map could be recorded as
a lot split.
Discussion followed regarding the recording of lot splits
under the old procedure.
City Attorney Flandrick stated what was recorded and what
was on the assessment maps was entirely unrelated; that
until the lots were sold off the Assessor's Office would
not divide the tax bills.
The motion died for lack of a second.
RES. NO, 64-34
A L LCW I NG CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS AGAINST CITY
OF B.PK,
GEN. CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS NOS. 26-27
AND 31 AND 4052-
4054 INCL.
RE H.H.F.A. PAYMENT
RES. NO. 64-34
ADOPTED
L.S, NO, 596
3251 N. ATHOL,
Wm. F. Berritt
MOTION MADE
MOTION DIED FOR
LACK OF SECOND
00-
BIB]
39576-U01
1964-U02
02-U02
12-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO115493-U03
DO116799-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
4/24/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1964 02 12 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 5 [ Í«Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council
AT 7:27 P.M. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT THE CITY
COUNCIL ADJOURN TO THE CONFERENCE ROOM OF THE CITY HALL,
COUNCILMAN BISHOP SECONDED, There were no objections, the
motion carried and was so ordered by Mayor Bloxham.
00-
At 7:30 p.m. Mayor B!oxham reopened the Adjourned Regular
Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council in the Conference
Room of the City HaII.
City Clerk Ba!kus took the roll call which was identical
with the one taken at the commencement of the meeting in
the Council Chamber.
00-
Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated that there
were three main Items concerning the next sewer district
to be discussed this evening: the size of the district,
the procedure or the thinking of the Council in the selec-
tion of Consulting Engineer, and whether or not the City
is going to H.H.F.A. for financing.
Councilman Holmes stated he was still of the opinion
that better time could be made by doing District No. 3
and combining District Nos. 4 and 5. He asked the Chief
Administrative Officer for a report on his trip to San
Francisco to see Mr. Emmert.
Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated that Mr.
Emmert reported to him that the Regional Office in
San Francisco could approve an advance planning loan
in any amount; that the big problem in larger loans
was the availability of funds; that they have one 1)
million dollars in their budget revolving fund) for
loans; that it took the repayment of loans from projects
to keep the loan fund alive; that Mr. Emmert had applica-
tions which had been tentatively approved but the funds
were not yet available; that priorities were established
on the tentative approval date. Mr. Nordby stated that
the tentative approval took from two 2) weeks to five
5) weeks and approximately another sixty 60) days
to get the money.
Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated he had talked
with three 3) firms that stated a signed agreement between
the engineering firm and the City would be sufficient
basis to go to a lending institution and get enough funds
to proceed with the design.
Councilman Holmes commented that a private engineer would
have to be paid in full whereas H.H.F.A. funds would not
be repaid if the district fell through.
Mr. Urban J. Schreiner, O'Melveny & Myers, stated if the
proceedings were abandoned for a time and the engineering
plans were on hand and later the district was started,
the cost of engineering could be recovered at that time.
City Engineer Young stated that the plans could be ready
for review within sixty 60) days on District No. 3.
Councilman Holmes asked Mr. Schreiner if all of the
districts could be combined and then set up the work to
be done by units. Continued)
February 12, 1964
Page 3
ADJOURNMENT AT
7:27 P,0M. TO CONFER-
ENCE RA OF CITY HALL
7:30 P.M. COUNCIL
MTG. REOPENED
ROLL CALL
SEWER DISTRICT NO. 3
THREE MAIN ITEMS TO
BE DISCUSSED
SIZE OF DISTRICT, PR(
CEDURE OR THINKING
OF COUNCIL IN SELEC-
TION OF CONSULTING
ENGR. AND WHETHER OR
NOT CITY GOING TO
H.H.F.A. FOR FINANCIN
COUNCILMAN HOLMES
OPINION
REPORT BY C.A.O.
NORDBY RE TRIP TO S.F
TO SEE MR. EMMERT
S.F. H.H.F.A. COULD
APPROVE ADVANCE PLAN,
LOAN I N ANY AMT.
TENT. APPROVAL TAKES
2-5 WEEKS APPROX.
ANOTHER 60 DAYS TO
GET LOAN MONEY
RE ENGR. FIRAIS
URBAN J. SCHREINER,
O'MELVENY & MYERS
PLANS COULD BE READY
FOR REVIEW ON DISTRIC
NO. 3 IN 60 DAYS
RE COMBINING OF
DISTRICTS
BIB]
39576-U01
1964-U02
02-U02
12-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO115493-U03
DO116799-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
4/24/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1964 02 12 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 5 [ Í«1&3 djourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council February 12, J964
Page 4
Mr. Schreiner stated that one proceeding could not be started
for District 3, 4, and 5 and then split it up into units
which could be taken one district at one time and another
district at another time; that a'l of the plans would have
to be ready at the time of the public hearing.
Mayor Bloxham stated that there had already been a
unanimous vote to do the remaining districts in one
district; that the agreement with the contractor could
specify the work schedule; that he had been told that WORK SCHEDULE
the prints would be in in approximately one hundred 100)
to one hundred ten ilO) days; that by taking the dis-
tricts altogether the public hearing could be early in
the fall.
Discussion followed wherein City Engineer Young stated CONSTRUCTION COULD BE
that construction could be started about November 1964 if STARTED ABOUT NOV.
all three districts were taken together). 1964
Discussion followed concerning possible litigation pro-
blems.
Mr. Urban Schreiner stated as far as the time schedule
of construction was concerned even though if the districts
were to be combined, the proceedings would be started at
same time, one way to expedite construction would be to
let two,possibly three separate contracts; that way if RE POSSIBILITY OF
the Council received low bids from three different bidders LETTING THREE CON'-.
they would have the same time schedule, working simultaneously TRACTS
on all three; that the construction in each area could be
done at the same time.
City Engineer Young stated that schedules could be set
up to carry on work in all three districts; that the
Engineer of Works would set up starting diagrams for
certain areas; that the diagrams would depend upon when
they start; that this would allow the Engineer of Work
to have the bidders to submit the amount of equipment
they had and would propose to use in the district and
set the minimum amount of equipment deemed necessary; BIDDERS TO SUBMIT
that it was his opinion, in scheduling this out, the AMOUNT OF EQUIP-
scheduling would be such that the work would not be done MENT THEY HAD AND
in the downtown district during the holiday season. PROPOSE TO USE
Regarding the contracts Mr. Schreiner stated the district
was assessed on the basis of benefit; that you aggregate
all of the estimated construction costs and spread that
evenly over the entire district.
Discussion followed concerning soil conditions.
Mr. Schreiner further stated that in his opinion it would MR. SCHREINER'S
be fair to say that it would be less expensive for the OPINION THREE DIS-
p ople Involved to take all three districts at one time TRICTS COMBINED WOULr
because bond counsel and several other consulting fees BE LESS EXPENSIVE
graduated by virtue of the size of the job: one set of FOR PEOPLE INVOLVED
publications, one set of printing of notices; that many of
the costs would not be duplicated in one district where
they would in two or three; that in his opinion you could
point to economy by putting all three districts together.
Councilman Holmes stated he was for getting this City
severed as soon as possible.
Discussion followed.
COUNCILMAN BISHOP MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL TAKE THREE,
FOUR AND FIVE SEWER DISTRICTS) IN ONE PROJECT. COUNCIL-
MAN MOREHEAL) SECONDED. The motion carried by the follow-
ing vote:
Continued)
MOTION MADE AND
CARRIED THAT CITY
COUNCIL TAKE THREE,
FOUR AND FIVE SEWED
DISTRICTS) IN ONE Pf
JECT
BIB]
39576-U01
1964-U02
02-U02
12-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO115493-U03
DO116799-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
4/24/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1964 02 12 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 5 [ Í«Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council February 12, 1964
Page 5
AYES: COUNCIL1AFN BISHOP,, MOREHEAD, HOLMES,
T.ti`'LOR AND i':AYOR BLOXHAM
NO'.S: N'>i:E
ABS 1 NONE
00-
I
I
Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated the Council RE SELECTION OF DESK
might v;ith to consid'r further tno selection of a Design ENGR.
Eno i near'.
Discussion followed that proposals were to have been
ready fDr this meeting.
COUNCILMAN BISHOP MOVED THAT WE CONTINUE WITH ALL THE MOTION MADE
PREVIOUS SERVICES, ENGINEERING, LEGAL, AND ASSESSMENT
SP^EAD ON DISTRICTS NO. 3, 4, AND 5 VOR A, LYONS,
L, J. THOMPSON, STONE & YOUNGBERG AND OtMELVENY & MYERS);
AND THAT THE CITY ENGINEER AND Crl?EF AD.MINISTRATIVE OFFICER
GET TOGETHER AND COME UP WITH A CONTRACT OF WHAT IS TO
BE EXPECTED FROM EACH. &IAYOR BLOXHAM SECONDED.
Councilman Holmes stated he felt the motion was premature;
that even though the Council might be satisfied with the
various consultants this motion employ,-?d them without
terms or conditions.
Mr. Schreiner stated he could not agree wholeheartedly MR. SCHREINER'S
with the motion; that it should be subject to acceptable OPINION RE MOTION
contract provided to the Council; that in his opinion
about as far as the Council could go tonight without
having an agreement presented for consideration would be
to approve the employment of the consulting firms that
were dealt with befc.e provided that their cervices
again arpeared to be reasonable; that p;-Irhaps the Council
would iKe to limit the hG;is for compensation to be no
greater than that for Sewer District No. 2 or something
similar; that Councilman Holmes raise( a viiid point
that tha motion shoL'!d not be so restriz:tive that any
contract could be torc,ed on the City without the
Counci! iaving had an opportunity to approve it.
With the consent of the second Councilman Bishop withdrew MOTION WITHDRAWN
the motion.
Counci umun Bishop asked Mr. Schreiner to word an appropriate
motion to include hat the City wished to continue w;th
the sarie concern s,''ti;h ps',jv1siaiu provdding rat tic-:on-
tracts were agreed upon by all concerned and the cost was
not greater than in No. 2.
COUNCILMAN BISHOP MOVED TO APPROVE THE EMPLOYMENT OF THE MOTION MADE
SAME CONSULTING FIRNG NAMING THEM IVOR LYONS, L. J.
THOMPSON, STONE & YOUNGBrRG AND O'MELVENY & MYERS) AS WERE
EMPLOYED ON DISTRICT NO. 2 ON A BASIS Or COMPENSATION NO
GREATER THAN THAT OF DIS;''R;CT'LO. 2 PROVIDED THAT ALL OF
THE FOUR CONTRACTS ARE COC)RD I NATED TO FLAKE SURE EVERY
ASPECT CF THE WORK IS ACCO.APLISHED SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
OF THE CITY COUNCIL, MAYOR BLO>.HAM SECONDED,
In answer to a question by Mayor Bloxham, City Engineer RE ADDITIONAL IN-
Young stated the additional) incidental Items transferring CIDENTAL ITEMS
the actual as built plans to the orginals, staking re-
quirements, eAact sLheduling of the work for the con-
tracto'- and estimation of equipment) might change the
percentage of the negotiating fee slightly.
Discussion followed regarding the rates charged by
Engineers.
Continued)
BIB]
39576-U01
1964-U02
02-U02
12-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO115493-U03
DO116799-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
4/24/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1964 02 12 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 5 [ Í«djourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council
Mr. Schreiner sta-te-d the Assessment Engineer's fee fluctu-
ated depending open the ease with which they could carry
oUt the work; that his understanding was that between
Thompson and Stone & Youngberg the third district would
be automated to the extent it could be; that the billing
and the assessment roll would be prepared on I.B.M.
Mr. Schreiner further stated O'Melveny & Myers' fee
schedule had been revised and their fee would be lower
than it was for Districts I and 2.
In answer to Coutnei4 s questions Mr. Schreiner stated
in his opinion if t4e motion on the floor was adopted
it should be considered by the members of the Council
as an expression of intent; that it would represent a
satisfaction with the services that had been provided
in District Nos. I and 2; that when special consultants
were retained in these fields perhaps a few dollars one
way or another eras. not the sole criterion of which
proposal should be accepted- that as Mr. Holmes pointed
out various work could be accomplished by one that another
would not offer to do; that by asking Ivor A. Lyons for
a proposal the Council was expressing satisfaction with
the work.he-had pertosmed; that for the protection of the
City, the proposal of Ivor Lyons should then be examined
by the City Engineer, the reasonableness of it should be
verified with other independent engineers, the scope of
duties that he would undertake to perform should be set
forth to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, City
Attorney and other legal counsel.
Further discussion followed wherein an addition to the
motion was suggested by Mr. Schreiner and agreed upon by
the maker of the motion and the second which was as
follows: AND REQUEST THIS GROUP OF CONSULTANTS TO SUBMIT
PROPOSALS AS WELL AS OTHER FIRMS DOING THE SAME TYPE OF
WORK.
There was considerable discussion wherein the motion was
withdrawn.
COUNCILMAN BISHOP MOVED THAT THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER AND CITY ENGINEER BE INSTRUCTED TO PREPARE
SPECIFICATIONS AND GET WRITTEN PROPOSALS IN ON ALL THE
CONSULTING FIRMS PERTAINING TO THIS SEWER DISTRICT),
FOUR OF THEM ENGINEERING, FINANCIAL), ASSESSMENT.SPREAD,
LEGAL) AND HAVE THEM BACK INHERE BY NEXT WEDNESDAY,,
COUNCILMAN HOLMES SECONDED.
It was clarified that the proposals were to be written;
that the. consultants need not be present at the meeting.
Mr. Schreiner stated the Council was not calling for the
type of services which required a contract to be awarded.
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN BISHOP, HOLMES, MOREHiEAD,
TAYLOR AND MAYOR 61,OXHAM
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
00-
February 12, 1964
Page 6
RE ASSESSMENT
ENGINEER'S FEE
O'MELVENY & MYERS'
FEE
MR. SCHREINER'S
OPINION RE MOTION
ON FLOOR
ADDITION TO MOTION
MOTION WITHDRAWN
MOTION MADE THAT
C.A.O. AND CITY ENGR,
BE INSTRUCTED TO PRE-
PARE SPECIFICATIONS
AND GET WRITTEN.PRO-
POSALS IN ON ALL CON-
SULTING FIRMS PERTAIN
ING TO THIS SEWER
DISTRICT).FOUR OF
THEM ENGINEERING,
FINANCIAL, ASSESSMENT
SPREAD, LEGAL) AND
HAVE IT BACK IN HERE
BY NEXT WED.
MOTION CARRIED
BIB]
39576-U01
1964-U02
02-U02
12-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO115493-U03
DO116799-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
4/24/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1964 02 12 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 5 [ Í«Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council
I
City Attorney Flandrick presented Lot Split No. 602,
California Property Brokers, 4049 Merced Avenue. He
stated the Planning Commission had adopted a resolution
this evening recommending approval, PC 64-15. He
suggested that Page 2, Paragraph g" be amended to
provide that a grading plan shall be submitted by the
applicant if required by the City Engineer to be approved
by him prior to the issuance of a building permit"; that
the applicant had indicated that he did not intend to
make any change in the grade.
City Engineer Young stated there was a 1% grade required
toward the street.
The Council agreed on the change suggested by the City
Attorney.
City Clerk Balkus read Resolution No. 64-35 by title as
follows:
RESOLUTION NO. 64-35
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK APPROVING A
LOT SPLIT APPLICANT: CALIFORNIA PROPERTY
BROKERS, 4049 MERCED AVE., L.S. 602)"
COUNCILMAN HOLMES MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 64-35 BE
APPROVED AS AMENDED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED.
COUNCILMAN BISHOP SECONDED. The motion carried by the
following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN HOLMES, BISHOP, MOREHEAD,
TAYLOR AND MAYOR BLOXHAM
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
There was further discussion regarding the cash deposit and
who was to accept it wherein City Attorney Flandrick stated
Resolution No. 64-35 provided for a cash deposit.
MAYOR BLOXHAM MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZE THE
CITY ENGINEER TO ACCEPT THE NECESSARY CASH DEPOSIT FOR
THE IMPROVEMENTS. U.S. 602). COUNCILMAN HOLMES SECONDED.
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: MAYOR BLOXHAM, COUNCILMEN HOLMES,
BISHOP, MOREHEAD AND TAYLOR
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
00-
Discussion followed regarding an amendment to the Lot Split
Ordinance in order that the City Engineer could collect
cash deposits for simple lot splits wherein City Attorney
Flandrick stated that this could be accomplished by a
minute motion.
COUNCILMAN HOLMES MOVED TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER IN
ALL FUTURE CASES WHERE LOT SPLITS ARE PRESENTED TO HIM AND
THERE IS NO DEDICATION REQUIRED AND ALL OTHER REQUIREMENTS
OF SECTION 9303 OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE) ARE
MET TO ACCEPT CASH DEPOSITS FOR IMPROVEMENTS AND TO AUTHOR-
IZE THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE TO ACCEPT THE MONEY. MAYOR
BLOXHAM SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMAN HOLMES, MAYOR BLOXHAM,
COUNCILMEN BISHOP, MOREHEAD AND
TAYLOR
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
00-
February 12, 1964
Page 7
L.S. NO. 602
CALIF. PROPERTY
BROKERS, 4049 MERCED
AVE.
10 DAY WRITTEN WAIVER
OF NOTICE RECEIVED
CHANGE PAGE 2,
PARAGRAPH g"
RES NO. 64-35
APPROVING A LOT SPLIT
APPLICANT: CALIF.
PROPERTY BROKERS,
4049 MERCED AVE.,
L.S1 602)
RES, NO. 64-35
ADOPTED
MOTION MADE AND
CARRIED THAT CITY
COUNCIL AUTHORIZE
CITY ENGR. TO ACCEPT
NECESSARY CASH
DEPOSIT FOR THE
IMPROVEMENTS
RE CASH DEPOSITS
SIMPLE LOT SPLITS
MOTION MADE AND
CARRIED TO AUTHORIZE
CITY ENGR. IN ALL
FUTURE CASES WHERE Lr
SPLITS ARE PRESENTED
TO HIM AND THERE IS
NO DEDICATION REQUiR
AND ALL OTHER REQUIRr
MENTS OF SECTION 930'
ARE MET TO ACCEPT CA
DEPOSITS FOR IMPROVE
MENTS AND TO AUTHOR-
IZE DIRECTOR OF FIN?
TO ACCEPT MONEY
BIB]
39576-U01
1964-U02
02-U02
12-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO115493-U03
DO116799-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
4/24/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1964 02 12 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 5 [ Í«1642
Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council February 12, 1964
Page 8
AT 9:20,P.M, COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADJOURNMENT AT 9:20
ADJOURN. MAYOR BLOXHAM SECONDED, There were no objections, P.M.
the motion carried and was so ordered by Mayor Bloxham.
00-
% lr G~-~ rilC~. fl
THELMA L. BALKUS, CITY CLERK
APPROVED: 1964.
Date of Distribution to City Council 1964.
Date of Dis-fribution to Departments 1964.
BIB]
39576-U01
1964-U02
02-U02
12-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO115493-U03
DO116799-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
4/24/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1964 02 12 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 5 [ Í«ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 12, 1964.
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER) 14403 East Pacific Avenue 7:00 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park met in ad-
journed regular session at the above place at 7:00 p.m.
Roll Call: Present: COUNCILMEN HOLMES, BISHOP ROLL CALL
MOREHEAD, TAYLOR AND MAYOR
BLOXHAM
Absent: CHIEF OF POLICE BEST AND CITY
TREASURER PUGH
Also Present: CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER
NORDBY, CITY ATTORNEY FLANDRICK,
CITY ENGINEER YOUNG, ASSISTANT
CITY ENGINEER WELCH, PLANNING
DIRECTOR AND BUILDING SUPER-
INTENDENT KALBFLEISCH, FINANCE
DIRECTOR DUNCAN AND CITY CLERK
BALKUS
00-
AT 7:27 P.-M. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADJOURNMENT AT
OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ADJOURN TO THE CONFERENCE ROOM 7:27 P.M. TO
OF THE CITY HALL. COUNCILMAN BISHOP SECONDED. There were CONFERENCE ROOM
no objections, the motion carried and was so ordered by OF CITY HALL
Mayor B l oxham.
00-
THELMA L. BALKUS
City Clerk
DATED: February 12, 1961
TIME: 7.1 2
BIB]
39576-U01
1964-U02
02-U02
12-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO115493-U03
DO116799-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
4/24/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06