Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1964 06 17 CC MIN1964 06 17 CC MINHÄ—@¸—6ƒÍ«REGULAR MEETING OF THE BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL JUNE 17, 1964 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER) 14403 East Pacific Avenue 7:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park met in regular session at the above place at 7:30 p.m. Councilman Adair led the salute to the flag. Roll Call: Present: COUNCILMEN ADAIR, CRITES, GREGORY, MCCARON AND MAYOR MOREHEAD FLAG SALUTE ROLL CALL Absent; CHIEF OF POLICE BEST Also Present: CITY ENGINEER YOUNG, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER FOGLE, PLANNING DIRECTOR AND BUILDING SUPER I NTEN'_)ENT KALBFLE I SCH, ASSISTANT. PLANNING DIRECTOR HILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR DUNCAN, LIEUTENANT O'LEARY, CITY TREASURER PUGH AND CITY CLERK BALKUS Chief Administrative Officer Nordby and City Attorney Flandrick arrived at 7:35 P.M.) 00- COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT THE MINUTES OF JUNE I, 1964, MINUTES OF JUNE 1, BE APPROVED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN 1964 APPROVED AND ADAIR SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: FURTHER READING WAIVED AYES: COUNCILMEN GREGORY, ADAIR, CRITES, MCCARON AND MAYOR MOREHEAD NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE 00- City Clerk Balkus stated that a petition with one hundred PETITION AND thirty-four 134) signatures and a letter from Mrs. Thomas LETTER REQUESTING Workman and Mrs. Augelita De Leon had been received regarding STOP SIGN OR OTHER a request for a stop sign or other caution sign at the CAUTION SIGN AT corner of Bess and Barnes Avenue. CORNER OF BESS AND BARNES AVE. Mrs. Thomas Workman, 3448 Patritti Avenue, Baldwin Park, MRS. THOMAS WORKMAN, spoke in behalf of the petition. 3448 Patritti Ave., B.Pk. 1881..1 Mayor Morehead commented that the Traffic and Safety TRAFFIC AND SAFETY Commission report indicated there was not enough traffic COMMISSION REPORT to warrant a boulevard stop sign; that there was no INDICATED THERE WAS record of any other accidents at this location; that in NOT ENOUGH TRAFFIC their opinion the only real solution would be the installa- To i+llARRANT BLVD. STOP tion of sidewalks. He stated that Chief Best had recommended to the school board that they set up a Junior Traffic Patrol but the school board did not seem interested in this recommendation. Councilwoman Gregory commended Mrs. Workman for her interest in the safety of the children. Councilman McCaron commented that the shrubs had been cut down which increased visability. Mayor Morehead suggested if the people in the area were IF PEOPLE IN AREA interested in participating in a program for curbs, gutters INTERESTED IN CGS and sidewalks that they contact Chief Administrative Officer CONTACT C..A.0. Nordby. BIB] 39576-U01 1964-U02 06-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO115493-U03 DO116823-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 4/24/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1964 06 17 CC MINHÄ—@¸—6ƒÍ«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council' City Treasurer Pugh stated she would be attending a con- vention out of town four days of the week of June 21, 1964. 00- City Treasurer Pugh read in full the City Treasurer's Report for May 31, 1964. COUNCILMAN MCCARON MOVED THAT THE CITY TREASURER'S REPORT AS OF MAY 31, 1964, BE RECEIVED AND FILED. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY SECONDED. There were no objections, the motion carried and was so ordered by Mayor Morehead. 00- City Clerk Backus stated that Mr. Tracy Bousman had requested time to speak on Tract No. 29416. She stated this tract had been finally approved but there was a problem as to the recordation. Mr. Tracy Bousman, 212 South First Avenue, Arcadia, stated in the subdivision the owners dedicated a portion of Bogart Avenue; that they found there was also a condemnation pro- ceeding which covered the same property; that he requested that the City abandon the condemnation proceeding inasmuch as the title, when recorded, would pass to the City. City Attorney Flandrick stated this related to Parcel 226 in one of the seven law suits presently pending concerning acquisitions necessary for Sewer District 61-A-I; that it would be in order to abandon that particular action and in addition it was suggested that the Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign an agreement with Henry Levin, the subdivider, whereby Mr. Levin would guarantee the City that if there should be anything in inverse condemnation in the amount of our appraisal or any other amount that he would guarantee to hold the City free and harmless. COUNCILMAN MCCARON MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL PROCEED WITH THE RECOMWIENDATION OF THE CITY ATTORNEY THAT WE AUTHORIZE THE PROPER AUTHORITIES TO SIGN AN AGREEMENT WITH MR. LEVIN TO HOLD THE CITY FREE AND HARMLESS FROM THE SUBJECT CLAIM) AND TO ABANDON AS TO PARCEL 226 IN THE CASE OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK VERSUS DUPONT. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN MCCARON, ADAIR, CRITES, GREGORY AND MAYOR MOREHEAD NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE 00- City Clerk Balkus presented a petition from owners of property fronting on Marion Avenue northerly of Olive Street requesting the City to take such action as was necessary to provide a public street along said Avenue. City Attorney Flandrick commented that the City Council was in an unusual position as far as this street was concerned; that this was an existing private street; that the City had the opportunity to do one of two things if the Council wished to accomplish what the people were requesting; that the first would be to direct the condemna- tion of the area included within this street which he Continued) June 17, 1964 Page 2 CITY TREASURER ATTENDING CONVENTION WEEK OF JUNE 21, 1964 CITY TREASURER'S REPORT MAY 31, 1964 RECEIVED AND FILED TRACY BOUSMAN REQUEST TO SPEAK RE TRACT NO. 29416 TRACY BOUSMAN, 212 S. First Ave., Arcadia PROBLEM OF RECORDA- TION MOTION MADE AND CARRIED THAT CITY COUNCIL PROCEED WITH REC. OF CITY ATTY. THAT WE AUTH. PROPER AUTHORITIES TO SIGN AN AGREEMENT WITH MR. LEVIN TO HOLD CITY FREE AND HARM- LESS FROM SUBJECT CLAIM) AND TO ABANDO' AS TO PARCEL 226 IN THE CASE OF CITY OF B.PK. VS. DUPONT PETITION FROM OWNERS OF PROPERTY FRONT INtz ON MARION AVE. NORTW ERLY OF OLIVE ST. REQUESTING CITY TO TAKE ACTION NEC'. TO PROVIDE PUBLIC STREE ALONG SAID AVE. BIB] 39576-U01 1964-U02 06-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO115493-U03 DO116823-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 4/24/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1964 06 17 CC MINHÄ—@¸—6ƒÍ«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council June 17, 1964 Page 3 I would not recommend; that the second possibility would be to accept the petition and direct the City Engineer and the Street Superintendent in the future to maintain this street and.treat it as a public street and within a period of five years the City would acquire a prescriptive easement for uses as a public street so far as Marion Avenue was concerned; that this was not a very satisfactory solution in that the City would not acquire it immediately as a public street; that he recommended the second course of action. In answer to a question by Council McCaron regarding the owners dedicating the street, City Attorney Flandrick stated this was one recommendation not made because it had been his experience that the property owners in the Baldwin Park Covina West Covina area thought they owned the underlying fee but did not in many cases; that it would cost $38,00 for a Title Report to determine ownership; that in his opinion this would be an unwarranted expense. City Attorney Flandrick stated if the City Engineer and Street Superintendent were instructed to maintain this street and treat it as a public street that within a period of four or five years if it was so maintained a resolution would be presented to the Council for adoption to accept informally an offer of dedication as a public street; that the City would never have a completely clear title. Discussion followed that presently the street was forty 140) feet in width; that it appeared there was some dedication already; that sometime in the past there was some feeling that the City should not accept dedication on a street where there was no access to the dedicated portion; that there was no policy regarding this as far as the City Attorney was aware of; that the street north of Marion was Chilcot. No one spoke or came forward when Mayor Morehead asked NO ONE IN AUDIENCE if there was anyone in the audience who was interested WHO WAS INTERESTED in the street or who signed the petition. IN STREET OR WHO SIGNED PETITION Mayor Morehead asked what advantage there would be to the property owners or to the City. City Engineer Young stated in his opinion it would be an advantage to the City to have it declared a public street since there was a tract in this area which will let this entire area start to develop. Councilman McCaron asked if the tract had an easement over the private street for access. City Engineer Young stated there was an easement on Chilcot and part of it is"; that at one time there were all of the signatures on Bogart; that the signatures for the dedication of Bogart for a public street were in the hands of Pond Engineering in West Covina; that Marion was a wider street and there were not quite the problems involved in maintaining it as a public street; that part of Bogart was only twenty 420) feet; that Marion came into the center of the tract; that Chilcot could be continued over in line with the future street to the east of the tract and then run northerly to Nubia. Mayor Morehead stated he would personally think that property owners who were interested in the City taking over and maintaining the street would be interested and willing to improve the street according to City specifications and when the street was improved they Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1964-U02 06-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO115493-U03 DO116823-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 4/24/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1964 06 17 CC MINHÄ—@¸—6ƒÍ«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council would dedicate the entire street to the City at no cost. Discussion followed. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL SUBMIT THE MATTER TO THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER AND CITY ATTORNEY FOR CONSULTATION WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS AND REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITHIN THIRTY 30) DAYS. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. There were no objections, the motion carried and was so ordered by Mayor Morehead. 00- Regarding proposed Resolution No. 64-129, City Attorney Flandrick stated at the last Council meeting there was a letter from the 640 Corporation, subdivider of Tentative Tract No. 29528 together with a letter from the Osbornes asking that the condition with regard to the demolition of buildings be eliminated in order to record the map without any cloud on the title; that the agreement prepared by himself had been approved by the Osbornes and provided for the reconstruction and/or demolition of the four exist- ing residential structures. In answer to a question by Councilman McCaron, City Attorney Flandrick stated that the Resolution could be held over to the next regular meeting or until such time as the agreement had been signed. COUNCILMAN MCCARON MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE AGREEMENT OSBORNES) AND DIRECT THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN AND DIRECT THE CITY CLERK TO PLACE RESOLU- TION NO. 64-129 ON THE NEXT AGENDA FOR CONSIDERATION. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN MCCARON, GREGORY, ADAIR, CRITES AND MAYOR MOREHEAD NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE 00- City Attorney Flandrick requested an executive session to discuss some matters pending in litigation. Mayor Morehead suggested that this session b1p held at the end of the meeting. 00- City Clark 8alkus read Resolution No. 64-130 by title as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 64-130 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A NURSING AND CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL 13932 EAST RAMONA BOULEVARD; FRANK C. CROWHURST, APPLICANT; CASE NO. CP-28)" June 17, 1964 Page 4 MOTION MADE AND CARRIED THAT CITY COUNCIL SUBMIT MATTER TO C.A.O., ASST. CITY ENGR. AND CITY ATTY. FOR CONSULTATION WITH PROPERTY OWNERS AND REPORT TO CITY COUNCI WITHIN THIRTY 30) DAYS RE PROPOSED RESOLU- TION NO. 64-129 RE TENT. TRACT 29528 AGREEMENT OSBORNES RE RECONSTRUCTION AND/OR DEMOLITION OF FOUR EXISTING RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE MOTION MADE AND CARRIED THAT CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AGREEMENT OS8ORNES) AND DIRECT MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN AND DIRECT CITY CLER TO. PLACE RES. NO. 64-129 ON NEXT AGENDI FOR CONSIDERATION CITY ATTY. FLANDRICK REQUESTED EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS MATTERS PENDING IN LITIGATION EXECUTIVE SESSION TO BE HELD AT END OF MTG. RES. NO. 64-130 DIRECTING ISSUANCE OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW CON- STRUCTION AND OPERA- TION OF NURSING AND CONVALESCENT HOSP. 13932 EAST RAMONA BLVD.; FRANK C. CROWNURST, APPLICANT; CASE NO. CP-28) Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1964-U02 06-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO115493-U03 DO116823-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 4/24/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1964 06 17 CC MINHÄ—@¸—6ƒÍ«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council COUNCILMAN MCCARON MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 64-130 BE APPROVED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN MCCARON, ADAIR, GREGORY AND MAYOR MOREHEAD NOES: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMAN CRITES ABSENT: NONE 00- City Clerk Balkus read Resolution No. 64-131 by title as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 64-131 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK CLARIFYING AN AMBIGUITY, WITH REFERENCE TO THROUGH LOTS" COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 64-131 BE APPROVED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN GREGORY, ADAIR, CRITES, MCCARON AND MAYOR MOREHEAD NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE 00- City Clerk Balkus read Resolution No. 64-132 by title as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 64-132 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DENYING THE ZONE CHANGE FROM ZONE R-3 TO ZONE M-I ON CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF EAST DALEWOOD STREET AND NORTH MAINE AVENUE APPLICANT BLUE CHIP INVESTMENTS, INC. CASE NO. Z-225)" COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 64-132 BE APPROVED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN MCCARON SECONDED. In answer to a question by Councilman McCaron, City Attorney Flandrick stated this resolution would deny Z-225 as applied for and the Council had directed that the City initiate a zone change to C-2 and advise that at that time he should apply for a conditional use permit for a service station. The toot on carr{ett by the f o I lowing vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN GREGORY, i'APON, AD44 AND MAYOR MOENEAD NOES-. t4ONE ABSTAIN: COUNCtLMAN CRITES ABSENT: NONE 00- City Clerk Backus reed ReeolutIon No. 64-137 by title as fol lows: June 17, 1964 188 Page 5 RES. NO. 64-130 ADOPTED RES. NO. 64-131 CLARIFYING AN AMBIGUITY, WITH REFERENCE TO THROUGH LOTS RES. NO. 64-131 ADOPTED RES. NO. 64-132 DENYING ZONE CHANGE FROM ZONE R-3 TO ZON M-I ON CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT NORTHEAST CORNER OF E. DALEWOOD ST. AND N. MAINE AVE. APPLICANT BLUE CHIP INVESTMENTS, INC. CASE NO. Z-225) 132 RES. NO. +d I Y RE S NO. 64-137 APPOINTING IVORY Continued) Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1964-U02 06-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO115493-U03 DO116823-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 4/24/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1964 06 17 CC MINHÄ—@¸—6ƒÍ«88* Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council RESOLUTION NO. 64-137 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK APPOINTING IVORY CRITES AS A MEMBER OF SAID CITY COUNCIL" City Attorney Flandrick stated that the following should be added to Section I was appointed as a member of the City Council." COUNCILMAN MCCARON MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 64-137 BE APPROVED AS AMENDED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN MCCARON, ADAIR, GREGORY AND MAYOR MOREHEAD NOES: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMAN CRITES ABSENT: NONE 00- City Clerk Balkus read Resolution No. 64-138 by title as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 64-138 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK APPOINTING LEO KING AND MIKE GIRALDI TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF SAID CITY" The Council decided that Leo King would be appointed to Office Number 6, the term to expire on February I, 1965, and that Mike Giraldi would be appointed to Office Number 7, the term to expire on February 1, 1966. City Attorney Flandrick stated this resolution would not become effective until July I, 1964, when the ordinance takes effect creating a seven man Planning Commission. June 17, 1964 Page 6 CRITES AS A MEMBER OF SAID CITY COUNCIL RES. NO. 64-137 ADOPTED RES. NO. 64-138 APPOINTING LEO KING AND MIKE GIRALDI TO THE P.C. OF SAID CITY LEO KING APPOINTED TO OFFICE NO. 6, THE TERM TO EXPIRE ON FEBRUARY I, 1965 MIKE GIRALDI APPOINTE TO OFFICE NO. 7, THE TERM TO EXPIRE ON FEBRUARY I, 1966 RES. TO BE EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1964 COUNCILMAN IwCCARON MOVED THAT RESOLUT ION NO. 64-138 BE RES. NO. 64-138 APPROVED AS AMENDED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCIL- ADOPTED WOMAN GREGORY SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCtt.EAI MCCARON, GREGORY, ADAIR, CRITES AND MAYOR MOREHEAD NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE 00- City C?er-k B.al ku9 rc.4 Aaao tut ton No. 64-439 by t i t l e as to Itow$: RESOLUTION NO. 64-139 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN ARK SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING REGARDING PROPOSED CHANGES IN THE WORK FOR AS SE %S-- MENT DISTRICT NO. 62-.A-I' RES. NO. 64-439 SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING REGARDING PROPOSED CHANGES IN THE WORK FOR ASSESS4IF. T 01ST. Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1964-U02 06-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO115493-U03 DO116823-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 4/24/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1964 06 17 CC MINHÄ—@¸—6ƒÍ«I Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council Mr. Simms, Ivor Lyons and Associates, stated that the insertion in Section I b) I) would be 62-A-1 22R". City Attorney Flandrick stated the insertion for Section I b) 3) would be"Lots 6 and 10". City Attorney Flandrick stated this resolution would set the time and place for the consideration of whether these changes should be made and at that time the Engineer of Work would present memorandums Indicating what the changes were, the necessity for them and the areas to be included; that he had reviewed the changes with Mr. Lyons and Mr. Young and agreed that the changes appear to be necessary under the circumstances. The public hearing date was changed in Section I c) from July 1, 1964, to July 15, 1964, because of the time required to publish. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 64-139 BE APPROVED AS AMENDED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCIL- MAN CRITES SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN GREGORY, CRITES, ADAIR, MCCARON AND MAYOR MOREHEAD NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE 00- City Attorney Flandrick requested that Item No. I under the Chief Administrative Officer, Consideration of the 1911 Act for 64-A-I, be held until later in the meeting; that Mr. Charles Martin, would be present at 9:00 p.m. As there were no objections, Mayor Morehead stated this matter would be held until later in the meeting. 00- Chief Administrative Officer Nordby reviewed his report on the agreement and Resolution for the maintenance of State Highway VII-LA-BWP) which recommended that Resolution No. 64-136 be approved which directed the execution of the subject agreement. City Attorney Flandrick stated he had reviewed the proposed agreement and recommended that it be approved. City Clerk Balkus read Resolution No. 64-136 by title as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 64-136 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE OF STATE HIGHWAY IN THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK" COUNCILMAN MCCARON MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 64-138 BE APPROVED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN MCCARON, GREGORY, ADAIR, CRITES AND MAYOR MOREHEAD NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE June 17, 1964 Page 7 INSERTION SECTION I b) 1) INSERTION SECTION I b) 3) PUBLIC HEARING DATE CHANGED TO JULY IS, 1964 IN SECTION I c) RES. NO. 64-139 ADOPTED ITEM NO. I UNDER C.A.O. CONSIDERA- TION OF 1911 ACT FOR 64--A-I HELD UNTIL LATER IN MTG. REPORT AND AGREE- MENT AND RESOLUTION FOR MAINTENANCE OF STATE HIGHWAY VII-LA-BWP) SAN BERN. FREEWAY THROUGH CITY AND PUENTE AVE. FROM SOUTH CITY LIMIT TO SAN BERN. FREEWAY RES. NO. 64-136 APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE OF STATE HIGHWAY IN THE CITY OF B.PK. RES. NO. 64-136 ADOPTED BIB] 39576-U01 1964-U02 06-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO115493-U03 DO116823-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 4/24/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1964 06 17 CC MINHÄ—@¸—6ƒÍ«1 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated that shortly after the Council was seated one of the Councilmen suggested that he investigate the possibility of acquiring some excess Flood Control property roughly north of Pacific between Central and Badillo; that there was a strip there ninety-one 91) feet wide and approximately fourteen or fifteen hundred 1400 or 1500) feet deep; that there had been several applications which had been tentatively accepted by the Flood Control District for the sale of this property; that the City, however, had the first chance to acquire it; that it appeared that this might be a good location for a public park of some kind, perhaps a picnic grounds; that the price established by the Flood Control District for sale to private individuals was $.24 per square foot which makes the price for the entire parcel approximately $21,700.00; that the City could acquire the parcel for $.18; that the City did have sufficient funds in the Unappropriated Surplus Fund to acquire this property. He showed a map of the parcel. Councilmen Morehead asked if this parcel could be considered for a City yard some time in the future. Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated he would assume there was that possibility although the parcel was very narrow. Councilman Morehead stated it was his understanding the Flood Control District purchased this property for $.05 a square foot and asked why they would not sell it for this price plus costs involved. Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated from the information he had the Flood Control District had pur- chased the property six or eight years ago on borrowed money; that the appreciation of the land involved plus the interest on the borrowed money had probably inflated the cost; that this price was based on an amortization basis for administrative costs and so forth. City Attorney Flandrick stated from the information he had received the Flood Control District paid approximately $.14 a square foot for this property in 1957 or 1958. As there were no objections, Mayor Morehead stated this matter would be held in abeyance until the next adjourned meeting. 00- City Engineer Young presented Final Tract Map No. 29371 stating this tract was located westerly on Pacific Avenue off of Vineland; that this was one of the tracts making use of part of the Flood Control property; that the proper subdivision bonds and agreements were on file; that the cash bonds had been posted; that he recommended that the City Council authorize the necessary officials to sign the Tract Map. City Clerk Backus read Reso4ut*on No, 64-140 by title as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 64-140 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK APPROVING FINAL TRACT MAP NO. 29371" COUNCILMAN MCCARON MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 64-140 BE APPROVED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: June 17, 1964 Page 8 REPORT ON POSSIBLE ACQUISITION OF EXCESS FLOOD CON- TROL PROPERTY NORTH OF.PACIFIC BETWEEN CENTRAL AND BADILLO HELD IN ABEYANCE UNTIL ADJ. MTG. FINAL TRACT MAP NO. 29371 RES. NO. 64-140 APPROVING FINAL TRACT MAP NO. 293rr RES. NO. 64--IAO ADOPTED Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1964-U02 06-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO115493-U03 DO116823-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 4/24/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1964 06 17 CC MINHÄ—@¸—6ƒ Í«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council June 17, 1964 Page 9 AYES: COUNCILMEN MCCARON, GREGORY, ADAIR, CRITES AND MAYOR MOREHEAD NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE 00- 188'9 City Engineer Young requested permission to advertise for REQUEST TO ADVERTISE bids for the Ramona Boulevard Gas Tax Improvement Project FOR BIDS which would be from Francisquito westerly almost to the wash; that the right-of-way access, plans and specifications RAMONA BLVD. GAS TAX had been approved by the State; that there would be an IMPROVEMENT PROJECT eighty 801 foot right-of-way; that there would be no parking on the portion the City obtained from the Pacific Electric right-of-way; that there would be a shoulder; that there was no signalization of Francisquito and Ramona Boulevard proposed at this time; that it was proposed for the future. Discussion followed. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT THIS MATTER BE HELD OVER FOR CLARIFICATION FROM CITY ATTORNEY FLANDRICK AND CITY ENGINEER YOUNG. In answer to a question by Councilman McCaron, Council- woman Gregory stated there was nothing written in the Agenda folders on this matter. City Attorney Flandrick stated he could not make any recommendation as to the acquisition of right-of-way; that the only problem he knew of was the agreement with Pacific Electric and he understood that was now in the possession of the City Clerk as a signed and executed agreement; that this would be a slope easement. City Engineer Young stated he would have the written information by the next meeting. MOTION MADE THAT THIS MATTER BE HELD OVER FOR CLARIFICA- TION FROM CITY ATTY. FLANDRICK AND CITY ENGR. YOUNG COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. There were no objections, MOTION CARRIED the motion carried and was so ordered by Mayor Morehead. 00- City Engineer Young reviewed his report on the request by REQUEST BY M.T.A. the Metropolitan Transit Authority for a bus stop on FOR BUS STOP ON Frazier Street east of Bess Avenue stating that the FRAZIER ST. EAST OF Traffic Committee recommended that the request be denied BESS AVE. on the basis that the on-coming traffic from Frazier Street was rather fast and heavy, and that the bus stop, while it would be adjacent to a street stop, would still block the street so that no other traffic could pass, thus creating an unsafe condition as the street was only thirty-two 32) feet wide at this particular point. Discussion followed. COUNCILMAN MCCARON MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ACCEPT THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE TRAFFIC AND SAFETY COMMITTEE AND DENY THE PROPOSED BUS STOP AT BESS AND FRAZIER STREETS. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN MCCARON, GREGORY, ADAIR. CRITES AND MAYOR MOREHEAD NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE MOT ION MADE AND CARRIED THAT COUNCIL ACCEPT THE REC. OF THE TRAFFIC AND SAFETY COMMITTEE AND DENY THE PROPOSi BUS STOP AT BESS AN FRAZIER STREETS BIB] 39576-U01 1964-U02 06-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO115493-U03 DO116823-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 4/24/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1964 06 17 CC MINHÄ—@¸—6ƒ Í«1890 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council June 17, 1964 Page 10 Item No. I under the Chief Administrative Officer and Item No. 4 under the City Engineer were considered at this time. Chief Administrative Officer Nordby reviewed his report REPORT RE CONSIDERA- regarding the consideration of 1911 Act procedure for TION OF 1911 ACT Sewer District No. 64-A-I stating that he was Inclined PROCEDURE FOR 64-A-1 to favor the 1911 Act. He passed to the Council informa- tion that he had received on the 1911 Act including a booklet prepared by McKensie-Brown. City Attorney Flandrick stated that each member of the Council had received a copy of memorandum he and Mr. Charles Martin had prepared. Mr. Charles R. Martin, Attorney at Law, San Marino, CHAS. R. MARTIN, California, stated he was a party to the contract ATTY. AT LAW, entered into by and between the City of Baldwin Park San Marino, Calif. and the firm of Martin and Flandrick to act as Special Counsel for Assessment District 64-A-1. He stated that in that capacity they were recommending that the Council change from the 1913 Improvement Act to the 1911 Improve- ment Act for the reasons set forth in the memorandum; that both of the Acts were more than fifty years old and had served well; that, in their opinion, the 1911 Improvement Act had three distinct advantages in this case; that first from the standpoint of public relation in that the Council would afford to the people who were to be assessed two hearings rather than one and in that regard give them a better opportunity to express their feelings, viewpoints, protests and other matters; that it would be easy for the Council to consider the 1913 Act which was a one hearing procedure; that it was certainly a lot more expeditious and certainly a lot less trouble for the Council to have the protestants to come once rather then twice but they had found from the public relations standpoint that if the electors were given the chance to come twice and protest first on the issue itself of whether the project was to go in and secondly on the amount of money; that it effected the Council's decisions, in their opinion, in such matters as change orders and supplemental assessments as set forth in the memorandum and their experience and recommendation was that they thought the Council would be happier from a public relations standpoint with the 1911 Act; that in their opinion, the Council would be happier from a time standpoint in that it would save some four months timing in going ahead with this particular district and any other districts the Council wished to participate in including the district coming up later this evening after which they also recommended the 1911 Act; that the third directly related, of course, to time because time was money in that it would save the City and the electors money first from the standpoint of saving time; that costs went up in a four month period and interest ran in a four month period; that remember under the 1913 Act the taxpayers became liable for their bonds and started paying interest immeldately regardless of how long it took to put in the project; that under the 1911 Act the project was completed before interest commenced; and for that reason, in their opinion, the taxpayers were generally happier paying less interest for a shorter period of time, paying it only after they see what they had and were paying for rather than paying in advance; that the final point was, that while they could not promise any results and probably in fact could guarantee a negative result as far as the Stone & Youngberg contract entered into by and between this City some years ago; that they felt it related specifically to the 1913 Act and as financial consultants they became necessary in the 1913 Act or some financial consultants became necessary; that it was their opinion that no such financial consultant was necessary or appropriate in connection with the 1911 Act; that while they did not feel that the contract might necessarily be avoided by switching to the 1911 Act, they felt if it was to be evOii 4W%%J V tt* ft3 teh to the 1911 Act wou I d accomplish ftlitt 10fore from ft X V7" & 1,11' st cub l i c ConI BIB] 39576-U01 1964-U02 06-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO115493-U03 DO116823-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 4/24/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1964 06 17 CC MINHÄ—@¸—6ƒ Í«1$91 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council June 17, 1964 Page II j relations, time and money they recommended the 1911 Act for 64-A-I and also the Chevalier District coming up later this evening. City Attorney Flandrick stated that Mr. Ivor Lyons was in the audience; that he had discussed the situation concern- ing the District with Mr. Lyons and his comments and thoughts were commented upon in the memorandum; that Mr. Lyons had indicated if the Council determined that the 1911 Act was the appropriate Act for the establishing of this District; that in forty-five 45) days the plans and specifications would be presented to the Council, the District would then be formed, a public hearing would be set and considered. He stated under the 1913 Act there would be a delay of at least another six to nine months. Mr. Ivor Lyons stated this was correct. City Attorney Flandrick stated this became important as Mr. Martin had indicated, because as of the first of the year and again as of the first of May there would be salary increases as far as the construction work was concerned; that obviously there would also be material increases if there was a salary increase; that he thought that in sum and substance Mr. Lyons also recommends the 1911 Act. Mayor Morehead asked how would the 1911 Act expedite the drawings of the district. Mr. Martin stated the 1913 Act hearing was a single hearing involving both the project, the plans and specifications, and the assessment or the spread of that assessment thus involving not only a double hearing or dual hearing but also dual plans and dual engineering detail by Mr. Lyons; that in other words he must not only draw his plans and specifications for the installation but he must spread the assessment and determine the engineering as far as that was concerned; that if the 1911 Act was followed the plans and specifications could be completed within forty-five 45) days; that if the City waited until he spread the assessment, by using the 1913 Act, there would be another four month wait because of that engineering. Mr. Lyons stated that was correct; that if the Council adopted the 1911 Act in forty-five 45) days he could present construction drawings to the Council; that the Council could approve them and have the public hearing and let the contract and start constructing the job; that while the job was under construction then the assess- ment diagrams would be completed; that the Assessment Engineer would do his work; that the Legal Counsel would do their work; that if the Council used the 1913 Act all of these phases had to be completed before construction could start. in answer to a question by Mayor Morehead, Wr. Martin stated as soon as the hearing was held, if it was not protested out, the call for bids could go out, the contract let and construction started; that no money was received and the contractor was not paid until the job was completed and the final costs were ascertained; that then another hearing was held to determine the spread of the assessment. In answer to a question by Mayor Morehead, Mr. Martin stated the bid for the contract might or might not be the final cost depending on change orders, extras and such things that generally and usually come into these matters. Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1964-U02 06-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO115493-U03 DO116823-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 4/24/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1964 06 17 CC MINHÄ—@¸—6ƒ 1964 06 17 CC MINHÄ—@¸—6ƒ Í«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council June 17, 1964 Page 13 I I City Attorney Flandrick stated he would recommend that any contract let under the 1911 Act would have provision for assignment. Mr. Martin asked Mr. Lyons if in his experience the Council would be narrowing the field of bidders by the 1911 Act or the 1913 Act. Mr. Lyons stated he did not think so; that he felt on this particular project, 64-A-I, with a construction cost of between 2 and 2J million dollars there would be at least a dozen responsible bidders. Mayor Morehead asked if the Council decided on the 1911 Act when would the Legal Counsel and the Engineer of Work receive their money. Mr. Martin stated that Mr. Lyons already had a contract with the City for the payment of his costs; that his firm had a contract only for the 1913 Act and did not have a contract for the 1911 Act or for payment under the 1911 Act; that this would have to be worked out; that these fees were part of the incidental expenses and were financed by the contractor. In answer to a question by Mayor Morehead, Mr. Lyons stated he had a valid contract with the City whether the City went 1911 or 1913 Act; that he favored the 1911 Act; that he favored it on the first district and spoke his piece; that whichever way the City chose to go was perfectly alright with him; that he did feel that there was a modicule of advantage to the City, the longer the job was delayed the more it was going to cost; that every six months and possibly every three months there would be a wage increase. He stated he wished to cite a terrible example; that they had just taken bids on a job in the City of Needles which was completed thirteen months ago; that it was kicked around City Hall for thirteen months before it was put out to bid; that during that time there was a 7% increase in labor and a 4% Increase in materials; or a total of 11% increase in construction cost; that the same thing would apply to Baldwin Park; that if the City went the 1911 Act and got into construction fairly quickly he knew the City would avoid one and he thought the City might avoid two rounds of wage increases; that the City could save possibly 5% of 2 million dollars which was at least $100,000.00; that this would more than offset any additional costs involved with the 1911 Act because the contractor had to carry the paper until the job was completed; that he honestly felt there was a distinct financial advantage to the City in using the 1911 Act. Discussion followed regarding the Stone & Youngberg con- tract wherein Mr. Martin stated it was their opinion the contract was not wisely worded some years ago; that it was entirely possible even under the 1911 Act the City might still have to pay Stone & Youngberg; that there would be no necessity for financial consultants under the 1911 Act proceeding; that there would be no advice to give. City Attorney Flandrick stated he did not want the Council to decide this issue if they were not ready to decide it but he wanted to again point out, as Mr. Martin had indicated, that time was money; that if the Council delayed this matter for another month or sixty days time would be lost. It was decided to continue this matter to the adjourned HELD OVER TO ADJ. meeting contemplated for Monday, June 22, 1964. MTG. CONTEMPLATED FOR JUNE 22, 1964 BIB] 39576-U01 1964-U02 06-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO115493-U03 DO116823-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 4/24/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1964 06 17 CC MINHÄ—@¸—6ƒÍ«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council June 17, 1964 Page 14 City Attorney Flandrick stated Mr. Martin had prepared the DOCUMENTS RE proper documents in connection with Chevalier District-1964. CHEVALIER DISTRICT- He passed out the material to the Council. 1964 Mr. Charles Martin stated they had received a communica- tion from the Assistant City Engineer, Mr. Fogle, to expedite the Chevalier Avenue project so far as the paving, curbs, gutters and sidewalks were concerned; that they had prepared the necessary documents as their liking under the 1911 Act proceeding; that they could switch this to a 1913 Act if the Council desired; that the first page of the documents presented'ses a Certificate of the Engineer indicating that a petition had been filed and the requisite 60% of the area had signed the petition and were ready to install the improvements and pay for the improvements for Chevalier Avenue and abutting streets. City Attorney Flandrick stated this was the petition that was not in order at the last meeting in that it failed to contain the nature of the work and the area to be included; that this had been remedied by Mr. Fogle and had again been circulated and was now in order. Assistant Engineer Fogle stated this was correct. Mr. Martin stated the Engineer, if he would sign the petition tonight, authorized the Council to proceed with the second document being a Resolution declaring its intention to pro- ceed with a Special Assessment Proceeding on this particular District, giving it a name and the other matters appurtenant to initiating the project; that the second resolution would be a resolution appointing an Engineer of Work; that in this case it would be the City Engineer; that it was felt and recommended by the administration because this was a small job and could be handled with the administrative staff and it would not be necessary to hire outside Engineering Services and there would be no extra payment or cost for that matter; that the third resolution was a resolution appointing Special Counsel and he understood that the arrangement was to appoint the firm of Martin, Stevens and Flandrick as Special Counsel for the processing of this district either under the 1911 Act or 1913 Act; that follow- ing that was the usual agreement of the same type and nature of which they had with the City with regard to the 64-A-1 project listing the fees as 2% with a minimum guarantee of $500.00; that there was an estimate of $25,000.00 maximum on this project, which involved the street, curbs, gutters, sidewalks and driveway approaches; that the contract was in the usual form and in the form which they already had on the other project; that the next resolution was a resolution ordering the plans and specifications; that the plans and specifications had been prepared and the following resolution would be a resolution accepting those plans and specifications; that following that was the Engineer's estimate of the cost of the project which he did not have which apparently the Engineer did have or would have before the project proceeded too far; that proceeding from there would be the resolution of inten- tion to create this district pursuant to the 1911 Act and for the installation of the project, the bonds and so forth, the formation of the district appurtenant to the work that was to be done; that this was a four page resolu- tion and was to be posted and published in the usual manner and finally the Notice of Improvement which was posted on the property. He stated those would be the matters taken up this evening and processed as the initiation of a 1911 Act Project. Mayor Morehead asked if it was the property owners intention to process this under the 1911 Act. City Engineer Young stated that was correct. Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1964-U02 06-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO115493-U03 DO116823-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 4/24/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1964 06 17 CC MINHÄ—@¸—6ƒÍ«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council June 17, 1964 Page 15 Mayor Morehead asked Mr. Lackey if he had had any comment on this subject. I Mr. Ted Lackey stated the property owners were not interested TED LACKEY in the 1913 Act; that they did not know anything about it but had had experience with the 1911 Acton a previous pro- ject and were well pleased with it. In answer to a question by Councilman McCaron, Mr. Martin stated this merely started the proceeding; that the culmina- tion and the final effect of this packet of documents was to call a hearing prior to which notices would be mailed out and the property posted and an estimate of cost would be directed to the persons affected and a hearing set for August 5, 1964. Discussion followed concerning the petition wherein the petition was filed with the City Clerk at this time. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED TO ACCEPT, NOTE AND FILE THE CERTIFICATE OF THE ENGINEER. COUNCILMAN CRITES SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN GREGORY, CRITES, ADAIR, MCCARON AND MAYOR MOREHEAD NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE Resolution No. 64-142 was read by title as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 64-142 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROCEED WITH A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PROCEEDING, AND DESIGNATING THE DISTRICT AND SETTING BOUNDARIES THEREOF 1"CHEVALIER DISTRICT 1964")" COUNCILMAN MCCARON MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 64-142 BE APPROVED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN MCCARON, GREGORY, ADAIR, CRITES AND MAYOR MOREHEAD NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE- i 00- Resolution No. 64-143 was read by title as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 64-143 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK APPOINTING ENGINEER OF WORK" COUNCILMAN MCCARON MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 64-143 BE APPROVED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN MCCARON, ADAIR, CRITES, GREGORY AND MAYOR MOREHEAD NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE P.H. DATED AUGUST 5, 1964 s95 PETITION FILED WITH CITY CLERK MOTION MADE AND CARRIED TO ACCEPT, NOTE AND FILE THE CERT. OF THE ENGR. RES. NO. 64-142 DECLARING ITS INTENT. TO PROCEED WITH SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PROCEEDING, AND DESIGNATING DISTRICT AND SETTING BOUNDARIE THEREOF CHEVAL IEF DISTRICT 1964") RES. NO. 64-142 ADOPTED RES. NO. 64-143 APPOINTING ENGINEER OF WORK RES. NO.. 64-143 ADOPTED BIB] 39576-U01 1964-U02 06-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO115493-U03 DO116823-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 4/24/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1964 06 17 CC MINHÄ—@¸—6ƒÍ«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council June 17, 1964 Page 16 Resolution No. 64-144 was read by title as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 64-144 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK APPOINTING SPECIAL BOND COUNSEL TO PREPARE PROCEEDINGS AND AUTHORIZING AGREEMENT FOR THAT CERTAIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT KNOWN AS CHEVALIER DISTRICT 1964" COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 64-144 BE APPROVED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN GREGORY, ADAIR, CRITES, MCCARON AND MAYOR MOREHEAD NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE 00- RES. NO. 64-144 APPOINTING SPECIAL BOND COUNSEL TO PRE- PARE PROCEEDINGS AND AUTHOR IZING AGREEMENT FOR THAT CERTAIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT KNOWN AS CHEVALIER DISTRICT 1964" RES. NO. 64-144 ADOPTED Resolution No. 64-145 was read by title as follows: RES. NO. 64-145 ORDERING PLANS AND RESOLUTION NO. 64-145 SPECS. FOR THAT CERTAIN ASSESSMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY DISTRICT KNOWN AS OF BALDWIN PARK ORDERING PLANS AND.SPECIFICA.. CHEVALIER DISTRICT TIONS FOR. THAT CERTAIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 1964" KNOWN AS CHEVALIER DISTRICT 1964" COUNCILMAN ADAIR MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 64-145 BE RES. NO. 64-145 APPROVED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILWOMAN ADOPTED GREGORY SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN ADAIR, GREGORY, CRITES, MCCARON AND MAYOR MOREHEAD NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE 00- Resolution No. 64-146 was read by title as follows: RES. NO. 64-146 RESOLUTION NO. 64-146 ADOPTING PLANS AND SPECS FOR THAT CER- TAIN ASSESSMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY DISTRICT KNOWN AS OF BALDWIN PARK ADOPTING PLANS AND SPECIFICA- CHEVALIER DISTRICT TIONS..FOR"THAT CERTAIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 1964" KNOWN AS CHEVALIER DISTRICT 1964" COUNCILMAN CRITES MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 64-146 RES. NO. 64-146 BE APPROVED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILWOMAN ADOPTED GREGORY SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN CRITES, GREGORY, ADAtR, MCCARON AND MftXCR MOREHEAD NOES: NONE ABSENT; NONE 00- Resolution No. 64-147 was read by title as follows: RES. NO. 64-147 Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1964-U02 06-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO115493-U03 DO116823-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 4/24/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1964 06 17 CC MINHÄ—@¸—6ƒÍ«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council June 17, 1964 Page 17 RESOLUTION NO. 64-147 RES. OF INTENTION CHEVALIER DISTRICT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY 1964 OF BALDWIN PARK, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER IRE CONSTRUCT ICN AND IMPROVEMENT OF: I.) CHEVALIER AVENUE BETWEEN ITS INTER- SECTION WITH VINELAND AVENUE AND DEPOT AVENUE; AND 2) THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF VINELAND AVENUE IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH CHEVALIER AVENUE AND EXTENDING EASTERLY THEREFROM APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET AND WESTERLY THEREFROM APPROXIMATELY 122 FEET; AND 3) DEPOT AVENUE TO THE EXTENT OF CURB RETURNS AT ITS INTERSECTION WITH CHEVALIER AVENUE, BY THE INSTALLATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF: a) GRADING, PREPARATION OF SUBGRADE AND PAVING OF ASPHALTIC MATERIALS; b) CONCRETE CURBS AND GUTTERS; c) SIDEWALKS; AND d) DRIVEWAY APPROACHES, ALL IN THE MANNER, MEANS AND TO THE EXTENT SHOWN ON MAP ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER ENTITLED CHEVALIER DISTRICT 1964"; DECLARING THE WORK TO BE OF MORE THAN LOCAL OR ORDINARY PUBLIC BENEFIT AND DESCRIBING THE DISTRICT TO BE BENEFITED BY SAID WORK AND TO PAY THE COSTS AND EXPENSES AND FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS TO SAID WORK" I In Section 2, Resolution No."64-146" was inserted; Section 7 the sum of $25,000.00" was inserted; Section 8 The San Gabrie-I Valley Tribune" was changed to Baldwin Park Bulletin"; Section 5, the public hearing date was changed to the 19th day of August, 1964. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 64-147 BE RES. NO. 64-147 APPROVED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN MCCARON ADOPTED SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN GREGORY, MCCARON, ADAIR, CRITES AND MAYOR MOREHEAD NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE 00- AT 9:55 P.M. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT THE CITY RECESS AT 9x55 P.M. COUNCIL RECESS FOR TEN MINUTES. COUNCILMAN ADAIR RECONVENED AT 10:45 SECONDED. There were no objections, the motion carried P.M. and was so ordered by Mayor Morehead. 00- Lot Split No. 620, Ronald J. Chidwick, 4163 Center Street LS. NO. 620 was held over to the next regular meeting as there was no map of the proposed.diyision of land In the Council folders. HELD OVER TO NEXT REG. MTG. 00- BIB] 39576-U01 1964-U02 06-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO115493-U03 DO116823-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 4/24/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1964 06 17 CC MINHÄ—@¸—6ƒÍ«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council June 17, 1964 $' Page 18 COUNCILMAN MCCARON MOVED THAT ITEM NO. 2 UNDER PLANNING COMMISSION Resolution No. PC 64-78 setting forth an interpretation with reference to front yard fences in Zone M-1) BE DELETED FROM THE AGENDA. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY SECONDED. There were no objections, the motion carried and was so ordered by Mayor Morehead. 00- City Engineer Young reviewed the present status of the design for 64-A-1 stating that he'had.written a letter this date to the State Highway Division. requesting per- mission to jack a pipe underneath the freeway as agreed upon by the County Sanitation District and the Consulting Engineer and himself; that much of 64-A-1 was drafted and some of the calculations had been checked; that along with the 100 sheets that he had checked and signed he also left a copy of what Mr. Lyons had furnished, one set of Assess- ment Diagrams of 148 sheets; that he suggested that an early cut off date be set for all bond splits in order to facilitate the completion of the Assessment Diagram; that it would be necessary for the County Sanitation District to check,the plans; that Mr. Lyons would take care of this; that at the present time the Assessment Diagrams were 95% complete and the Construction Drawings were 72% complete; that Mr. Lyons could complete the remaining portion of the job early in August. City Attorney Flandrick stated that no action was required at this moment on the City Engineer's recommendation; that Assistant City Engineer Fogle should be directed to obtain from the County Health Officer the Health Officer's letter concerning 64-A-1. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL DIRECT THE ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER TO REQUEST FROM THE COUNTY HEALTH OFFICER THE HEALTH OFFICER'S LETTER CONCERNING PROPOSED DISTRICT 64-A-I. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. There were no objections, the mot.ion carried and was so ordered by Mayor Morehead. Further discussion followed regarding bond splits wherein City Attorney Flandrick stated a letter had been written to Mr. Rossetti asking him to give his written recommenda- tions regarding this matter prior to the first of July. 00- At 10:33 p.m. City Engineer Young was excused from the Council Chambers as he stated he had approximately 200 bonds to sign. 00- City Clerk 8a4kus read Ordinance No. 316 by title as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 316 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF SAID CITY AND REZONING CERTAIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY FROM ZONE A-1 TO C-2A ZONE CASE NO. Z-195)" ITEM NO. 2 UNDER P.C. DELETED FROM AGENDA REPORT BY CITY ENGR. RE STATUS OF DESIGN FOR 64-A-I MOTION MADE AND CARRIED THAT COUNCI DIRECT THE ASST. CITY ENGR. TO REQUE FROM THE COUNTY HEALTH OFFICER THE HEALTH OFFICER'S LETTER CONCERNING PROPOSED DISTRICT 64-A-I AT 10:33 P.M. CITY ENGR. YOUNG EXCUSED FROM COUNCIL CHAMBEF ORD. NO. 316 AMENDING THE ZON. MAP OF SAID CITY ANC REZONING CERTAIN DES CRIBED PROPERTY FROM ZONE A-I TO C-2A ZONE CASE NO. Z-I95 Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1964-U02 06-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO115493-U03 DO116823-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 4/24/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1964 06 17 CC MINHÄ—@¸—6ƒÍ«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 316 PASS SECOND READING AND BE ADOPTED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: June 17, 1964 Page 19 ORD. NO. 316 PASSED SECOND READING AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED AYES: COUNCILMEN GREGORY, ADAIR, MCCARON AND MAYOR MOREHEAD NOES: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMAN CRITES ABSENT: NONE 00- i City Clerk Balkus stated the next item which had been Z-217, CONTINUED continued from June 3, 1964, was an appeal from the FROM JUNE 3, 1964 denial of the Planning Commission, an application submitted by A. W. and Golda Cole and T. A. and Mary Colwick for a change of zone from C-i neighborhood commercial zone) and R-l single family residential zone) to R-3 heavy multiple family residential zone) or more restrictive use on certain real property located at 4642 and 4646 North Maine Avenue. Planning Director Kalbfleisch presented a resume of the RESUME case and stated the Planning Commission's recommendation was for denial. He showed a copy of the future street design. Mr. Jerry Hammond stated that this development would be completely out of the question as far as R-I was concerned. City Attorney Flandrick stated the public hearing had been closed; that testimony from the floor would be out of order. Discussion followed. COUNCILMAN MCCARON MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CONCUR MOTION MADE AND WITH THE FINDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND DENY CARRIED THAT COUNCIL Z-217. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY SECONDED. The motion carried CONCUR WITH FINDINGS by the following vote: OF P.C. AND DENY Z-217 AYES: COUNCILMEN MCCARON, GREGORY, ADAIR AND MAYOR MOREHEAD NOES: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMAN CRITES ABSENT: NONE 00- City Clerk Balkus stated the next item which had been continued Z-229, CONTINUED from May 20, 1964, was an appeal from denial of the Planning FROM MAY 20, 1964 Commission, an application submitted by John B. Danis for a change of zone from C-I neighborhood commercial zone) to R-3 heavy multiple family residential zone) or more restric- tive use on certain real property located southeast of Puente Avenue and northeast of the Alexander's Market. Planning Director Kalbfleisch reviewed the case and stated RESUME the Planning Commission's recommendation was for denial; that on June 2, 1964, the Planning Commission had reaffirmed their recommendation of denial. Discussion followed about C-I development in the area wherein Assistant Planning Director Hill stated Mr. Danis had previously indicated he still wanted R-3. City Attorney Flandrick stated that a resolution of denial and ordinance to approve the zone change could both be prepared for the next meeting and in the meantime Mr. Danis could be contacted and determine his wishes. Discussion followed. Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1964-U02 06-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO115493-U03 DO116823-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 4/24/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1964 06 17 CC MINHÄ—@¸—6ƒÍ«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council 1900 As there were no objections, Mayor Morehead stated this matter would be held over to the next regular meeting and instructed the Planning Director or the Chief Administrative Officer to contact Mr. Danis to see if he has changed his mind on the request for this zone change. 00- City Clerk Balkus read Ordinance No. 358 by title as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 358 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING SECTION 6220 OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO THE OPERATION OF TAXI-CABS" COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 358 PASS SECOND READING AND BE'ADOPTED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN'ADAIR SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN GREGORY, ADAIR, MICCARON AND MAYOR MOREHEAD NOES: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMAN CRITES ABSENT: NONE 00- City Clerk Balkus stated the next item regarded payment for overtime. Assistant City Engineer Fogle stated this involved work for the Police Open House which was before he began working for the City; that.a gentleman in the Street Maintenance was authorized to work overtime by the City Engineer; that it was his opinion that this should be paid; that it was a matter of approximately $30.00. Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated he realized the overtime was not authorized in the proper manner but also recommended that it should be approved. COUNCILMAN CRITES MOVED THAT THE PAYMENT BE PAID TO ROBERT FIORI IN THE AMOUNT OF $30.96. COUNCILMAN MCCARON SECONDED. The motion carried by the follow- ing vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN CRITES, MCCARON, ADAIR, GREGORY AND MAYOR MOREHEAD NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE In answer to a question by Councilman McCaron, City Attorney Flandrick stated the Personnel Rules and Regulations provided that overtime would be paid only upon Council authorization except in an emergency when authorized by the Department Head. Councilman Morehead stated, in his opinion, the payment of overtime should be rehashed at some future date; that he did not think there should be such a tight rein however proper authorization was needed. 00- Councilwoman Gregory asked about the'referendum concerning the Pickering property. Continued) June 17, 1964 Page 20 HELD OVER TO NEXT REG. MTG. COUNCIL INSTRUCTION ORD. NO. 358 AMENDING SECTION 622( OF THE B.PK. NUN. CODE, RELATING TO THE OPERATION OF TAXI-CABS ORD. NO. 358 PASSED SECOND READING AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED RE PAYMENT FOR OVER- TIME MOTION MADE AND CARRIED THAT PAYMENT BE PAID TO ROBERT FIORI IN THE AMT. OF $30.96 COUNCILWOMAN GREGOR* ASKED ABOUT REFEREN, CONCERNING PACKERIN PROPERTY BIB] 39576-U01 1964-U02 06-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO115493-U03 DO116823-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 4/24/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1964 06 17 CC MINHÄ—@¸—6ƒÍ«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council City Attorney Flandrick stated the property would retain its status as A-1 until such time as there was a zone change. 00- i City Clerk Balkus read Resolution No. 64-133 by title as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 64-133 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ALLOWING CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK" COUNCILMAN MCCARON MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 64-133 BE APPROVED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN CRITES SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN MCCARON, CRITES, ADAIR, GREGORY AND MAYOR MOREHEAD NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE 00- AT 11:10 P.M. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADJOURN TO AN EXECUTIVE SESSION. COUNCILMAN CRITES SECONDED. There were no objections, the motion carried and was so ordered by Mayor Morehead. 00- At 11:25 p.m. the City Council reconvened in regular session. June 17, 1964 1.90l Page 21 RES. NO. 64-133 ALLOWING CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AGAINST CITY OF B.PK. GENERAL CLAIMS AND DEMANDS NOS. 4565- 4662 AND 62-63 INCL. PAYROLL CLAIMS AND DEMANDS NOS. 4391- 4492 INCL. RES. NO. 64-133 ADOPTED ADJ. 11:10 P.M. TO EXECUTIVE SESSION 11:25 P.M. RECONVENE! IN REG. SESSION 00- AT 11:26 P.M. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT THE CITY ADJ. 11:26 P.M. TO COUNCIL ADJOURN TO MONDAY, JUNE 22, 1964, AT 7:30 P.M. MONDAY, JUNE 22, 1961 IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER OF THE CITY HALL. COUNCILMAN AT 7:30 P.M. ADAIR SECONDED. There were no objections, the motion carried and was so ordered by Mayor Morehead. 00- THELMA L. BALKUS, CITY CLERK APPROVED.. December I 1965. Date of Distribution to City Council November 26 1965. Date of Distribution to Departmegts November 29 1965. BIB] 39576-U01 1964-U02 06-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO115493-U03 DO116823-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 4/24/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1964 06 17 CC MINHÄ—@¸—6ƒÍ«f€ GULA R MEETING OF THE BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL JUNE 17, 1964 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER) I) O3 East Pacific Avenue 7:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park met in regular session at the above place at 7:30 p.m. Councilman Adair led the salute to the flag. FLAG SALUTE Roll Call: Present: COUNCILMEN ADAIR, CRITES, ROLL CALL GREGORY, MCCARON AND MAYOR MOREHEAD Absent: CHIEF OF POLICE BEST Also Present: CITY ENGINEER YOUNG, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER FOGLE, PLANNING DIRECTOR AND BUILDING SUPERINTENDENT KALBFLEISCH, ASSISTANT PLANNING DIRECTOR HILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR DUNCAN, LIEUTENANT O'LEARY, CITY TREASURER PUGH AND CITY CLERK BALKUS Chief Administrative Officer Nordby and City Attorney Flandrick arrived at 7:35 p.m.) 00- AT 11:26 P.M. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT THE CITY ADJ. AT 11:26 P.M. COUNCIL ADJOURN TO MONDAY, JUNE 22, 196)., AT 7:30 P.M. TO MON., JUNE 22, IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER OF THE CITY HALL. COUNCILMAN 1964, AT 7:30 P.M. ADAIR SECONDED. There were no objections, the motion IN COUNCIL CHAMBER carried and was so ordered by Mayor Morehead. OF CITY HALL 00- DATED: JUNE IS, 1964 TIME: 425 a.m. I THELMA L. BALKUS, CITY CLERK BIB] 39576-U01 1964-U02 06-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO115493-U03 DO116823-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 4/24/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1964 06 17 CC MINHÄ—@¸—6ƒÍ«STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SS: AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK OF A JO RN N WET= THELMA L. BALKUS, being first duly sworn, says and deposes: that I am the duly chosen, qualified and acting City Clerk of the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park; that at a- Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park held June 17 19 64, said meeting was ordered adjourned to the time and place specified in the Notice of the Adjournment ATTACHED HERETO; that on June 18 1964 at the hour of 9:45 a.m., I posted a copy of said Notice at a conspicuous place on or near the door of the place at which said meeting of June 17 19 64, was held. THELMA L. ALKU CITY CLERK Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 19 Notar' Publ ipTn an for said/County and State JACKQUELEAN ROADY My c mjnI!alon Expires Feb. 24b 1968 BIB] 39576-U01 1964-U02 06-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO115493-U03 DO116823-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 4/24/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 Í«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council Discussion followed regarding the construction costs and change,,. orders. Mr'. Martin stated that before the hearing was held there was an Engineer's Estimate. Mayor Morehead asked the disadvantages of the 1911 Improve ment Act. Mr. Martin-stated the disadvantages, if there were any.. were two; that one, it might be argued that the 1913 bonds might be sold for a lesser interest than. the 1911 bonds which almost always sell for 6% interest, the 1913 bonds were bid and the best bid takes it and that might in some cases be 5J%, 5% or it could, depending upon how valuable they were 41%, therefore there was a possibility of paying less interest; that on the other hand the people had been paying it generally for a year or eighteen months longer because they would start paying it now; that if there was an interest advantage as far as the rate was concerned it was lost by the extra year or year and one-half that they had been paying; that thb-other advantage generally claimed is that the 1913 Act permitted one thing that the 1911 Act did not and that was a multiplicity contract; that you could let portion A to contractor 1, portion B to con- tractor 2 and so forth; that this was a distinct advantage in a matter such as a road where the grading would be let to someone, the subbase to someone else; that on a sewer project generally it was not an advantage because one prime contractor was wanted. Mr. Martin further stated that the 1911 Act was the only Act that permitted the people to protest against a particular phase of the project such as he trampled my tree or he did not put the driveway apron back in; that under the 1913 Act the people did not have that opportunity because their only hearing was before it ever got off the ground; that under the 1911 Act they did have this extra right; that they were also informed of the dollar amount they would have to pay; that they then had thirty days in which to make the payment in cash or it went to bond; that generally speaking some sixty days after the project had been completed the people were informed of their cost and the matter went to bond and they started to pay their interest. Mr. Lyons stated that construction time was estimated at eight 81 months from the award of the contract. Mr. Martin stated that allowing for contingencies and for the two or three months it took to award the contract the time period would be close to a year. Discussion followed that the second hearing was only for the spread of the assessment and the determination of whether or not the project was properly completed; that the contractor financed the project until the project was completed. Mr. Martin stated it had been claimed that the contractor, because he did bear the burden of the front money, did add to his bid the cost to himself for the front money; that the pamphlets the Council had indicated it was still a push financially; that there was no advantage financially to the 1911 or 1913 Act insofar as the interest that the people pay or the money that they would pay; that the advantage lay only in timing, and public relations and the money saved.,in the time savings. Discussion followed that the field of bidders would be narrowed because the contractor had to finance himself until the project was completed, however only well qualified and experienced bidders would be wanted on a project of this size; that they would have to be bonded. June 17, 1964 Page 12 Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1964-U02 06-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO115493-U03 DO116823-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 4/24/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06