HomeMy WebLinkAbout1965 04 13 CC MIN1965 04 13 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— . ¡Í«I
2304
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL APRIL 13, 1965
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER) 14403 East Pacific Avenue 7:30 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park met in
adjourned regular session at the above place at 7:30 p.m.
Mayor Morehead led the salute to the flag.
FLAG SALUTE
Roll Call: Present: COUNCILMEN ADAIR, CRITES, ROLL CALL
GREGORY, MCCARON AND MAYOR
MOREHFAD
Absent: CITY ATTORNEY FLANDRICK,
PLANNING DIRECTOR CRIVET'TA,
FINANCE DIRECTOR DUNCAN, ACTING
CHIEF' OF POLICE ADAMS AND CITY
TREASURER PUGH
Also Present: CHIEF' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER NORDBY,
CITY ENGINEER FRENCH, BUILDING
SUPERITI-EN KALBFLEISCH, AND
CITY CLERK BALKUS
00-
Mayor Morehead announced that the regular meeting of ADJ. MTG. FOR
April 7, 1965, had been adjourned to this evening for DISCUSSION OF PARKS
discussion of the parks and recreation situation; that AND RECREATION SITU(
Mrs. Gregory bad brought this matter up under New Business TION
at the last regular meeting.
Councilwoman Gregory stated this meeting would afford the
City Council and the Park Board members a chance to sit in
a joint meeting to discuss the subject, recreation in
Baldwin Park; that she was hopeful this would be the first
of many such meetings called to apprise the people most
interested in recreational needs as to what the needs are,
how they can best expedite the program and most importantly
the end result, a more expanded recreational program with
the city, ac#mools, and park district working together. She
invited the Park Board members present and Mr. Lucas to be
very active in the discussion stating she hoped this would
be a very informal meeting. She read a short history of
of the facts pertaining to Morgan and Barnes Park and
mentioned the memorandum from the Rosemead Administrative
Officer to the Rosemead City Council regarding Recreation
and Park District Law and the memorandum from the Rose-
mead City Attorney to the Rosemead City Council regard-
ing the Recreation and Park District.
Discussion followed wherein Mr. Francis J. Gregory, 4529 FRANCIS J. GREGO
North Walnut, Baldwin Park, explained the organization 4529 l- Walnut,
and reorganization of the Park District stating that B. Pk.
the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors was the
Supervising Authority and the Board of Directors; that
to make an Elective Board of Directors there would have
to be a dissolution of the Park District as it was now
and by a vote of the people stating that an Elective
Board was desired; that the City taking over the parks
was not the subject before the Council this evening;
that the Prime objective was asking the Board of Super-
visors to appoint people to be on the Board of Directors;
that this would bring the Dtrectio=s into the
City of Baldwin Park.
Councilwoman Gregory stated that there were three actual
unsuccessful attempts for the dissolution of the parka:
An election on June 30, 1958, Proposition k on the elec-
tion of June 7, 1960, and at the conclusion of the February
5, 1962, Baldwin Park City Council Meerting it bad been
decided that the matter would be put on the ballot in
June, however it- did Dot come to the vote of the people
at that time.
Continued)
BIB]
39576-U01
1965-U02
04-U02
13-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116848-U03
DO116907-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/1/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1965 04 13 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— . ¡Í«Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council April 13, 1965
Page 2
Mayor Morehead asked Mrs. Gregory's opinion concerning
action of the City of Rosemead with. respect to parks.
Councilwoman Gregory stated she had read the City of
Rosemead's Resolution No. 64-47 and that she.pereonall.y
did not agree with it. She read the resolution in full.
She brought out that Morgan Park was not County owned,
it was only County administrated; that Barnes Park was
County owned.
Councilwoman Gregory asked Mr. Lucas if Barnes Park were
transferred to the District would there be better manage-
ment.
Mr. Lee Lucas.- Administrator of the Baldwin Park, Park
and Recreation District.- stated br.was not at the resent
time; that improvements should be made by the County
before a transfer to the District.
We Francis J. Gregory Atated there vas-a letter stating
that the County would pay for the sever assessments at
Barnes and Morgan Park; that in the Barnes Park area
the streets were not widened to the full capacity
Patr;tti);that he believed if the City asked the County
to improve with paving.- curb and gutter the County would
do so as they owned the land.
Councilman McCaron asked what was being proposed this
evening.
Councilwoman Gregory stated there was a need to expand;
that the Park District operating with an Advisory Board
probably was not as effective as if there was rule closer
to home. She asked Mr. Lucas if he thought the recrea-
tion could be expanded into the schools with the set
up that now existed.
Mr. Lucas stated it could be done; that the question involved
was the amourt of money that went into overhead; that a
Legal Board establi3hed locally would have the right to
establish a ree:reational personnel section which would cut
down on the overhead which could conceivably run as high
as sever teen per cent 17%); that at the present time any
school district could enter into a contract with the County
of Los Angeles for school prog_ram supervision; that ethically
and professionally the School District probably would con-
tact the Baldwin Park Recreation and Park District to work
out a Joint program but they would not nececoarily have to
do so.
Councilman Mr-Caron asked how it was proposed to gain
control of Morgan Park as well as Barnes Park in order to
make if feasible to have direct communication.
Mr. Lucas stated the district would still control the pro-
graming and the supervision; that theonly thing that the
County maintains at Barnes Park was the title to the
property itself; that the Parks and Recreation District
was operating Barnes Park at the present time as they did
Morgan Park; that the operational budget vas theirs; that
at any given time the existing authorities could request
transfer of that property; that the County set aside money
for improvements on any County owned land; that assessment
mz4o came from the County General Fund; that capitol
improvements came from Park District Funds; that it might
be that the County would still be responsible for the
improvements after the title was transferred but this
was a legal question that perhaps the City Attorney could
anever.
Councilman McCaron stated as he understood sewers would
be the only thing the County would be responsible for
at Barnes out of funds other than funds collected in
the local district.
LEE Lump Administ
tor of the B.Pk...
Park and Recrea-
tion District
Continued)
BIB]
39576-U01
1965-U02
04-U02
13-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116848-U03
DO116907-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/1/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1965 04 13 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— . ¡Í«Adjourned Regular Meeting of".the Baldwin P rk'City Council April 13, 1965
Page 3 23:06
Mr. Lucas stated this was true at Morgan Park; that at
Barnes he would like to ask the formal question and see
if this park did not fall into the same category.
Councilwoman Gregory stated she believed when Mr. Hanes,
Executive Assistant to Mr. Norman Johnson, was out and
was questioned that he bad stated the improvements in
and around Barnes Park area would be out of the General
Funds rather than District Funds.
Mr. Bernard Martin, of the Park Board, stated if Barnes BERNARD MAMIN,
would stay with the County, in his opinion, this would Park Board Member
not hurt the City because he imagined the County would
still operate it as a County Park and then the tax-
payers of Baldwin Park would be getting some of their
tax dollars back which they should be getting. He
sited Arcadia as an example.
Mr, F ancia Gregory stated that the Arcadia Park was a
Regional Park; that the County Resolutions state that
any park within any city had to be maintained by the
city or the district; that the County would not operate
Barnes Park as it was within the City.
Further discussion followed concerning the improvements
that the Councy would pay for.
Mr. Francis Gregory stated, in his opinion, the City
could not be left out of recreation in Baldwin Park;
that the park lands the City had should be developed;
that the East San Gabriel Planning Committee was in-
viting Social Planners to their organization; that
recreation today was a major thing to be considered;
that the three public agencies school, park and city)
under State Law could, and should, work together.
Mr. Harry Eugene Hastings,of the Park Board,stated there HARRY EUGENE
bad been a lot of doubt in some of the people's minds.. HASTINGS,
especially the Park Board members, that there was a Park Board Member
possibility of the City taking over the operation of
the parks; that those who were considering the reorganiza-
tion of the Park Board did not have any intention of
this; that they were trying to see if it was adaptable
to reorganize the Board to make it a legal agency which
then could sit down with the City Council and School
Board and enter into contracts; that as it now was they
were an Advisory Board and the County Board of Super-
visors were actually the Governing Agency for the Park
District; that it was their thinking to reform the
Board only.
Mayor Morehead asked what would be the disadvantage of
the City taking over the parks as prescribed by the
1963 Law after the County has paid for the Sewer Assess-
ment.
Mr. Hastings stated by maintaining a separate park dis-
trict a separate taxing agency was maintained; that all
monies collected for recreation would be put into the
recreation fund, it would not be put into a General
Fund where if an emergency came up depleting the General
Fund the recreation department would have to wait until
the following year for additional monies.
Mayor Morehead stated under the 1963 Law the recreation
fund would be separate from the General Fund.
We Hastings stated further that, in his opinion, to a
greeter degree there would not be too many disadvantages.
Continued)
BIB]
39576-U01
1965-U02
04-U02
13-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116848-U03
DO116907-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/1/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1965 04 13 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— . ¡Í«Adjourned Regular Meeting of-the Baldwin Park City.Council April 13, 1965
Page4
Councilwoman Gregory stated that the Park Board would
still be an Advisory Board under Rosemsad's procedure;
that the length or the terms were drawn by lot.
Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated he bad bad a
discussion yesterday with Mr. Farrell of Rosemead and
Mr. Farrell bad stated that the County rather than the
District still retained the funds; that he Mr. Nordby)
was in accord with this; that it was his understanding
that the new Board of which the City Council appointed
three members and the Board of Supervisors two members
would continue to be reappointed; that to further
strengthen the Board to represent the community the
County Board of Supervisors bad appointed two members
which the City Council recaamended.
Mr. Hastings stated he understood that Rosemead bad
appointed three of their Council members to be on the
Park Commission; that be would be rather hesitant to
offer up a suggestion like the situation that ROsemead
bad with three Council members on the Park Commission;
that his suggestion would be for the Advisory Board that
there would be one 1) appointed by the Council, one 1)
appointed by the Chief Administrative Officer, one 1)
appointed by the School District Board, one 1) appointed
by the School Administration and the four members M IM a
suggestion to the City Council for the fifth member of
the Board.
Councilman McCaron stated he did not seean advantage
to this program unless both City parks could be acquired
and run by the same Board and the City would be saving
the taxpayers money by doing this.
Mr. Hastings stated that Barnes and Morgan were both
operated under the Park District; that the County owned
the land and this was all in Barnes Park.
Mr. Gregory stated he would like to we the five members
of the Park Board that they had now bey appointed; that
in the State Educational Code under a joint operation of
this type one 1) member of the Board of Trustees bad to
belong on the Board and he could be ex officio; that. the
way he saw it it would be the five 5) men from the old
Park and Recreation Board, one 1) person from the Board
of Trustees from the School, ex officio, and one 1) member
of the Council, ex officio, on this Board; that the
Administrator would be the Secretary of the Board. He
stated that it would be that legal questions be answered
by the City Attorney and engineering questions by the City
Engineer under this program. He stated that the City
Council at a regular meeting could not handle parks and
recreation matters; that they would have to adjourn to a
parks and recreation meeting. He mentioned that matters could
be expedited faster with the City Council as the Legal Board.
Further discussion followed wherein it was brought out
that the Board of Supervisors would be the Taxing Agency
under the program that Rosemead bad.
Councilman McCaron stated be would like to have a more
comprehensive report on this matter.
Discussion followed.
00-
At 8:47 p.m. Councilman McCaron left, the Council Chamber. 8:47 P.M. COUNCIL
MAN MCCARON LEFT
COUNCIL CHAMBER
BIB]
39576-U01
1965-U02
04-U02
13-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116848-U03
DO116907-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/1/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1965 04 13 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— . ¡Í«Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council April 13, 19 8
COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT COUNCILMAN MCCARON BE COUNCILMAN MCCARON
EXCUSED.* COUNCILMAN AD AIR SECONDED.' There were no ob- EXCUSED
Sections, the notion carried and was so ordered by Mayor
Morehead.
00-
i
I
Councilman Crites asked if the Park Board as the City had
now was a Taxing Agency as such.
Mr. Lucas stated that the Advisory Board was merely a
communication channel from the service clubs; that they
had no authority at all except to make recommendations
to the County Department of Parks and Recreation who
act as the Legal Authority for the District; that the
Board of Supervisors was the Supervising Authority or the
Taxing Authority; that the reorganization would give
the local Council the Legal Authority.
Mr. James Q. Gibson., 13268 East Francisquito, Baldwin JAMES Q. GIBSON,
Park, stated there was a ceiling on the park tax now of 13268:E* Francis-
$,50 and asked if it we not possible for the local quito, B. Pk.
Advisory Board to recommend a raise in tax rate.
Mr. Lucas stated they could advise the Budget Representa-
tive from the County of Los Angeles to do this; that the
recommendation was usually not refused.
Mr. Leo Caproni, 3934 Hornbrook, Baldwin Park, asked LEO CAPRONI,
Mr. Lucas if he found that generally the Board of 3934 Hornbrook,
Supervisors went along with all of the recommendations B.Pk.
of the Park Board.
Mr. Lucas stated yes and no; that the Budget Analyst
may eliminate some of the items; that once it was sub-
mitted to the Board of Supervisors it was generally
accepted as presented.
Mr. Caproni stated the expediting of matters would be
a real advantage as far as the City Council-being the
Legal Authority.
Mr. Martin asked if the park was dissolved would this
take the Board of Supervisors completely out of the picture.
Mayor Morehead stated yes.
Mr. Martin explained that the administrative costs of
the County were $10,000 last year and $14,000 this year;
that it had only been in the last two years that interest
had been given on the tax money the County had; that if it
were dissolved and the money kept locally there would be
more interest than they had now; that the people that
were now working in the park were County employees under
Civil Service; that the people in the Park District were
paying for retirement that the City employees did not
have; that if it was dissolved things would be more equal.
Councilwoman Gregory stated there was the maximum $.50
tax rate and how would we" go about getting that if it
were city owned.
Mr. Martin stated if it was worded right on the ballot
it would go over.
Mr. Lucas stated if the Park District were dissolved
the Chief Administrative Officer would then have the
problem of figuring out what the City's administrative
costs would be.
I
Continued)
BIB]
39576-U01
1965-U02
04-U02
13-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116848-U03
DO116907-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/1/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1965 04 13 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— . ¡Í«Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council April 13, 1965
21109 Page 6
Mr. Gregory stated if the. park district was, taken over
by the City the money woul&be put into the General
Fund; that the State Iaw only allowed $.05 for recrea-
tion; that he did know that certain taxes dould be used
for recreation, however if there was a disaster draining
out the General Fund the City could not guarantee anyr
thing but the $,-05; that now as it was there was a
guarantee of $,50 if they wanted it; that it was $.30
at the present time
In answer to a question by Councilman Crites., Mr.
Gregory stated that, the State allowed a General Law City
$.05 beyond weir tax rate for recreation purposes only.
Mr. Gibson stated it would seem that Mrs and Mrs.
Gregory do not agree; that Mrs. Gregory seemed to be in
favor of complete disaolution of the park.
Councilwoman Gregory stated no. She would like to see
both parka under, the District.)
Mr. Gibson brought out that as far as he could see that
the only thing to be gained would be in expediting matters;
that he could not see economy in this move at all; that
he was not at all opposed to the City taking over the parks
if it could be proved to him that it was the moat economical
way.
Further discussion follow-ed between Mr. Gibson and Mayor
Morehead wherein Mayor Morehead brought out that a
General Law city was limited to a $1.00 tax rate;
that if it reached $1.00 it could go to $1.05, $.05 of
which would be for recreation only.
Mr. Gregory brought out that he was working on the Santa
Fe Dam Regional Park; that this project was started ten
10) years ago; that the Board of Supervisors last year
took some of the recreation money to fight the Santa
Monica mountain fire.
Mayor Morehead stated, at the present timee, he would
strongly consider the Rosemead plan over complete
dissolution.
Councilwoman Gregory stated in asking for this
adjourned meeting she bad in mind to point out the
deficiencies in recreation in.Baldwin Park; that, in
her opinion, recreation should be brought up to what
the needs of the City require; that she would go on
record as saying that the people would be also in favor
of it to see that their children had the advantages that
that she believed that the district could
other cities have,
carry this City very well without the City's intervention;
that she felt that the Park District could do whet it wanted
to do; that what was needed was unity and a method to take
the administration and bring it into the City.
Mr. Gibson asked if there had been anyone in the school
administration who had. expressed that they would not
work with the local board with or without the City.
Councilwoman Gregory stated at one time there was
a statement made that the School Board did not want to
work with an Advisory Board or even the long range plan
through the County for a wide scale use of--facilities and
grounds and so forth.
Further discussion followed between Mr. Gibson and
Councilwoman Gregory.
Continued)
BIB]
39576-U01
1965-U02
04-U02
13-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116848-U03
DO116907-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/1/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1965 04 13 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— . ¡Í«I
Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council
Mr. Gregory stated he would like to know what the Park
Board Members present thought about it.
Mr. Martin stated he was not against the City operating
the parks although the district was formed by a vote
of the people and it should be dissolved by the people;
that Mr. Eisner kept bringing up the idea of the cities
getting more park lend; that he thought a survey should
be made as to what the other cities have including the
number of parks, number of acres and so forth.
Mr. Al Imam, 3131 North Maine, Baldwin Park, stated
that although the dissolution of the parks had failed
three times he felt if it was initiated at the present
time it would go over; that he felt that the necessary
steps should be taken when the time comes to take over
the perk; that he had served eighteen 18) years as a
member of the Park Board.
Mr. James Jersa, Big I ton Avenue, stated, in his opinion,
it should be left up to the voters.
Mrs. C,.be Rebidart, Merced Avenue, stated she felt as
Mr. Hastin(:: Mr. Mrtin and Mr. Jerea felt that this
was started by the people and if the district was to be
changed it should come by the vote of the people; that
whenever a home or a group of homes were built she felt
that so mach land should be set aside even if it was just
a- walk through perk.
Councilman Adair stated he agreed with Mr. Martin that
there should be a survey of the surrounding towns.
Councilwoman Gregory stated, for the people who
thought that the parks should be dissolved, that to
the City's tax rate if we should apply the $.29 that
would bring the City tax to approximately $.90 and
there would not be very far to go before hitting the
dollar sign and there was a lot further to go in recrea-
tion.
In response to Mr. Gibson, Councilwomen Gregory stated the
$.50 died with the dissolution of the parks; that discussion
had been made to buy land and improve land and she asked
with what?
Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated there we. a
Statuatory limit of $1.00 which could be levied by a
General Law city; that the people, by vote, could exceed
that $l.OO.
Further discussion followed.
Mr. Hastings reviewed the amount of money that would be
lost by the complete dissolution of the Park District as
follows: County 1W0.00 last year's assessment)
Irwindale 610.00
West Covim $112 00
30730.00
Mayor Morehead thanked those who bad attended this meeting
for their comment and their interest.
00-
City Engineer French reviewed his report which stated that
the City Attorney bad prepared an agreement for the furnish-
ing of design of the City storm drains as part of the 1964
Storm Drain Bond Issue; and that the agreement had been
signed by the engineers in accordance with the recommenda-
tion of the City Council. He recommended that the agree-
ment be approved and the Mayor and City Clerk be authorised
to sign said agreement with Johnson, lane sn and Malsh).
Continued)
April
713, 1965 2c-to
Page
AL LLNM, 3131 N.
Maine, B.Pk.
JAMES JERSA, Big
Dalton Avenue
MRS. GABE ROBIDART,
Merced Avenue
AGREEMENT
STORM DRAIN DESIGN
19611 ST I DBA
BOND ISSUE AND
1958 STORM DRAIN
BOiIPD ISSu
scuts IADAW,
JOMW
WALS
BIB]
39576-U01
1965-U02
04-U02
13-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116848-U03
DO116907-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/1/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1965 04 13 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— . ¡Í«Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park city council
COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT THE AdROM BE APPACirED
AND THE MAYOR AND CITY CLHEK AUTO TO SIGN. COUNCIL-
MAN CRITES SECOMM.- The motion carried by the follaving
votes
AYES: COUNCILMEN GBORY, CFI=, ADAIR
AND MAYOR MORAD
NOW s NONE
ABSMIT: COUNCILMAN MCGAAOIQ
M00-
Councilwomen Gregory asked that the Chief Administrative
Officer, along with whoever, be thought would be helpful,
give the Council a swmmar'y of what had been discussed.
Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated he would
give a summation of his feelings based on fact.
Mayor Morehead asked that Mr. Nordby take the Rosemead
Plan and report what he thought of it and what could
be done, the advantages and disadvantages, and a report
on the dissolution of the perks, advantages and disadvantages
coney wise *i.4 so forth.
Councilman Crites commented that there was a move under
foot to limit school building sites to the exact miniuou
it takes to build the buildings.
Councilwoman Gregory explained the State Law stated that
so much property had to be retained for recreation.
Councilman Crites stated he believed this was Just for
the schools, not for the public and that he would like
to have an interpretation on that particular thing be-
fore he would ever accept it. Be stated that some of the
school yards were locked shut and some locked open and
he thought they all ought to be one way or the other.
He stated that as far as the recreational program was
concerned he was in favor of it.
Councilwoman Gregory ca mmented on a new concept for the
school buildings whereby the buildings themselves would be
fenced off but not the school grounds.
00-
Mayor Morehead commented on the invitation received from
the Superintendent of Schools to attend a dinner and
meeting on April 21, 1965, and stated that congressmen
Cameron was to be present. Be stated if the Agenda was
not too heavy the TWO p.m. conference would be dispensed
with in order that the Council members who wished could
attend the dinner.
00-
AT 9:50 P.M. COUNCILMAN ADAIR MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
ADJOURN. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY BECON. There were no
objections, the motion carried and was so ordered by
Mayor Morehead.
00-
APPROVEDt May 5 1965,
Date of Distribution to City Council April 30 1965.
Date of Distribution to Deparfimente May 3 19650
X18 3, 1965
AGR~T APPROVED
AND MAYOR AND CITY
CLF18C AU1H. TO SIGN
COUNCIL INSTRUCTION
C.A.-O.+ TO MAKE
SU)I BY Cl" WHAT HAD
BEEN DISCUSSED
COUNCIL INVITED TO
ATTEND DINNER
RE 7:00 P.M.
CONFERENCE, APRIL
21, 1965
9:50 P.M. ADJ.
BIB]
39576-U01
1965-U02
04-U02
13-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116848-U03
DO116907-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/1/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06