Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1965 06 30 CC MIN1965 06 30 CC MINHÄ—@¸—/7Í«ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL JUNE 30, 1965 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER) 1L403 East Pacific Avenue 7:30 P.M. I The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park met in adjourned regular session at the above place at 7:30 P.M. Mayor Crites led the salute to the flag. FLAG SALUTE Roll Call: Present: COUNCILMEN ADAIR, GREGORY, ROLL CALL MCCARON, MOREHEAD AND MAYOR CRITES Planning Commission Members Present: GERALDI, GILMER, KALLEMEYN, KING, THOMAS AND CHAIRMAN CAPRONI Sutterfield arrived at 7:Lf.2 p.m.) Board of Zoning Adjustments Members Present: CANNADY, MCGOWAN, MARKELL AND STAFFORD Chairman Dargus arrived at 7:)40 p.m.) Also Present: CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER NORDBY, CITY ENGINEER FRENCH, BUILDING SUPERINTENDENT KALBFLEISCH, PLANNING DIRECTOR CHIVETTA, FINANCE DIRECTOR DUNCAN AND CITY CLERK BALKUS Absent: CITY ATTORNEY FLANDRICK, CHIEF OF POLICE ADAMS AND CITY TREASURER PUGH 00- Chief Administrative Officer Nordby presented Resolution RES. NO. 65-111 Numbers 65-I11 and 65-112 stating that No. 65-I11 was a resolution for claims and demands; that No. 65-112 was the final budget adjustment for 1964-65; that there was no change as far as the budget was concerned in the total appropriation; that there was deviation from his recommenda- tion concerning the acquisition of the park site along the RE PARK SITE Big Dalton Wash from the Flood Control; that at the time ACQUISITION this came up some months ago the staff was not sure whether BIG DALTON WASH the General Fund could stand the $21,750.00, and he had suggested that if it could not the money would be taken out of unappropriated surplus, however it had not been necessary to touch the investments and this was paid from the General Fund. Discussion followed regarding the striping machine, Warrant WARRANT NO. 6181 No. 6181, wherein Finance Director Duncan stated that Wald Industries furnished the City with the equipment approximately six months ago but had agreed to bill the City in June. City Clerk Balkus presented Resolution No. 65-III entitled: RES. NO. 65-III ALLOWING CLAIMS AND RESOLUTION NO. 65-111 DEMANDS AGAINST CITY OF B.PK. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ALLOWING PAYROLL NOS. 1315- CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY 1436 INCL. OF BALDW I N PARK" GENERAL NOS. 6133- 6187 INCL. AND f 3) Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1965-U02 06-U02 30-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116848-U03 DO116918-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/1/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 ADJOURNED-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1965 06 30 CC MINHÄ—@¸—/7Í«Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council June 30, 1965 Page 2 COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 65-ill BE RES. NO. 65-ill APPROVED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN ADOPTED MCCARON SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN MOREHEAD, MCCARON, ADAIR, GREGORY AND MAYOR CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE City Clerk Balkus presented Resolution No. 65-112 entitled: RES. NO. 65-112 AMENDING RES. 64-I49 RESOLUTION NO. 65-112 RELATING TO CERTAIN A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING RESOLUTION 64-149 RELATING TO CER- TAIN BUDGETARY APPROPRIATIONS" BUDGETARY APPROPRIA- TIONS COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 65-112 BE RES. NO. 65-112 APPROVED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILWOMAN ADOPTED GREGORY SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN MOREHEAD, GREGORY, ADAIR, MCCARON AND MAYOR CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE 00- City Clerk Balkus stated that Lot Split No. 298 was approved RE L.S. NO. 298 by the City Council in November, 1960; that the original owner Holt" no longer owned the property; that Parcel A" was in one ownership and Parcels 8" and C" were in another ownership; that Parcel A" was in escrow at the present time; that the lot split agreements of 1960 required either installa- tion of future street improvements or deposit for same when required by the City Engineer; that the realtor had con- tacted the City Clerk's office, and the buyer agreed to pay $70.00, or approximately 10%, as estimated by Dwight French, City Engineer, as assessment on Parcel A"; that before escrow could be closed the title company requests a release that can be recorded as the present agreement was a lien against the property; that $70.00 would cover the assessment for the front parcel; that Mr. Jordan, the new purchaser, had made the $70.00 deposit. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT VIRGIL A. JORDAN'S THE PRESENT MOTION MADE AND OWNER OF PARCEL A" IN LOT SPLIT NO. 298 APPROVED ON NOVEM- CARRIED THAT VIRGIL A. BER 17, 1960) SHARE OF THE FUTURE STREET IMPROVEMENTS IS IN JORDAN'S THE PRESENT THE SUM OF $70.00, AND UPON PAYMENT TO THE CITY OF SAID SUM, OWNER OF PARCEL A" SAID PARCEL A" AND VIRGIL A. JORDAN, BE, AND THE SAME HEREBY IN LS NO. 298, AP- ARE RELEASED FROM FURTHER OBLIGATIONS UNDER THAT CERTAIN PROVED ON NOV. 17, AGREEMENT DATED NOVEMBER lii., 1960, BETWEEN THE CITY OF 1960) SHARE OF FUTURE BALDWIN PARK AND OTIS D. HOLT AND MADGE HOLT. COUNCIL- STREET IMPROVEMENTS WOMAN GREGORY SECONDED. The motion carried by the following IS IN THE SUM OF vote: $70.00, AND UPON PAY- MENT TO THE CITY OF AYES: COUNCILMEN MOREHEAD, GREGORY, ADAIR, SAID SUM, SAID MCCARON AND MAYOR CRITES PARCEL A" AND VIRGIL NOES: NONE A. JORDAN, BE, AND ABSENT: NONE THE SAME HEREBY ARE RELEASED FROM FUR- THER OBLIGATIONS UNDER THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT DATED NOV. ILa., 1960, BETWEEN THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AND OTIS D. HOLT AND MADGE HOLT 00- BIB] 39576-U01 1965-U02 06-U02 30-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116848-U03 DO116918-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/1/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 ADJOURNED-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1965 06 30 CC MINHÄ—@¸—/7Í«Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council Mayor Crites stated that the main purpose of the meeting was to discuss plans for capital improvement; that this would come under the heading of New Business; that on January 12, 1965, the members of the Planning Commission received a two page letter from the Chief Administrative Officer regarding a meeting to discuss informally the relationship between the various members of the City Staff and the Planning Commis- sion; that with this there were several items discussed including the change from A-1 to R-l zoning; and it was said that while matters of zoning and subdivision would still occupy the Planning Commission's time or some part of it the Board of Zoning Adjustments would relieve the Commission of some of the detail problems and allow more time to be devoted to planning for the physical development of the city. He stated there was another letter dated March 9, 1965, regarding the Capital Improvement Program and another letter dated June 28, 1965, regarding initiating a Capital Improvement Program. He further stated that the remainder of the meeting would be an open discussion on the subject of planning; that he wanted the group to have some ideas together not only for planning for this year or next year but for ten years or more in the future. Mrs. Dargus asked how long it took to set up for a bond election. Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated there were certain requirements for setting up a special election with which the City Clerk was quite familiar; that the past experience in Baldwin Park was somewhat dismal with regard to bond issues, but it did not mean that a bond issue would necessarily fail; that the time consuming element was educating the people as to the purpose of the election and the benefits the City would derive from the funds once the bonds were authorized; that it would take approximately three to six months merely in a program of education. Mayor Crites stated he had an indication that the Planning Commission had established a priority list for projects they would like to see accomplished. Chairman Caproni stated it was the consensus of the Planning Commission at the time of their discussion that curbs, gutters, and sidewalks were the most important. He stated that it should be determined whether the entire City should be done at once, a district at a time or start from the schools and work out. He stated that the Chamber of Commerce had a committee set up to study this matter; that he thought a majority of the citizens would like to have curbs, gutters, and sidewalks; however it was a matter of educating the people of the benefits they could derive balanced against the cost of the project. He stated the manner of financing would have to be deter- mined such as by general bond or just encouraging the citizens to put them in. Mayor Crites stated perhaps this could be started by a survey from the Planning Director or City Engineer as to which streets needed curbs, gutters, and sidewalks and what amount was already in. Mr. King stated the Planning Commission had just initiated a study on underground utilities; that Glendora and several other cities were initiating an ordinance to have the utilities parallel the sidewalks and not go under them. 05 June 30, 196,5 Page 3 MTG. TO DISCUSS CAPITAL IMPROVE- MENT PLANS FOR CAPITAL IMPROVE- MENT LETTER FROM C.A.O. DATED JAN 12, 1965 RE MTG. TO DISCUSS RELATIONSHIP BETNEEN VARIOUS MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF AND P.C. LETTER DATED MAR. 9, 1965, RE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PRO- GRAM LETTER DATED JUNE 28, 1965, RE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MTG. TO BE DISC. ON SUBJECT OF PLANNING RE BOND ELECTION P.C. PRIORITY LIST FOR PRO- JECTS CGS ITEM I RE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1965-U02 06-U02 30-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116848-U03 DO116918-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/1/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 ADJOURNED-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1965 06 30 CC MINHÄ—@¸—/7Í«Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council June 30, 1965 Page 4 Chief Administrative Officer Nord by stated that Item No. 2 STREET LIGHTING on the Planning Commission's list was Street Lighting ADDING AND UPGRAD- adding and upgrading; that he had discussed this with the ING ITEM NO. 2 City Attorney and was hoping to have before the Council for the meeting of July 7, 1965, the necessary resolution to start a dissolution of the two lighting districts that now existed in Baldwin Park. Mayor Crites stated the third item was the Civic Center CIVIC CENTER exclusive of the site; that this was something that would EXCLUSIVE OF SITE take long range planning; that the plans could be begun; ITEM NO. 3 that there were many ways to obtain property and financing; that the Planning Commission had a minimum of six acres proposed. Councilman Morehead, regarding Item No. 1, asked how the RE CGS ITEM I plan of the Chamber of Commerce was progressing. Mr. Sutterfield stated he was a member of the committee of which Mr. Bloxham was Chairman; that he thought the consensus of opinion from the meeting was that for the curb, gutter and sidewalk program to be effective it should cover large areas of the community rather than small piecemeal work which they estimated would take twenty 20) years to do; that they ran into financing problems; one was the pave- out policy of the City; that if large portions were undertaken the present policy the City had would not be able to be financed on a current year to year basis as it was presently financed; that there were two or more plans discussed; that one was dividing the City into perhaps six districts and getting interested citizens to circulate petitions in order to petition the Council to set up a district, either 1911 or 1913 Act; that to solve the City's finances in paving out they considered the possibility of a bond issue to go City wide which would include the financing of connecting the streets to the curbs; that they were almost stalemated until something could be resolved with regard to what extent the City would be able to participate in paveout if the project went piecemeal. Mr. Cannady stated there might be some friction if the curbs, gutters and sidewalks were put in on a general obligation bond by the people who have already put in curbs, gutters and sidewalks and because of them have been paying higher taxes; that it might be considered to include the cost of the paveout as part of the curb, gutter and sidewalk expense and have the property owner pay a prorated portion; that this was something that was not going to be done overnight, and the City might start accumulating funds to be able to keep up with the program if it was determined that the City would pay for the paveout; that this program was going to take a lot of work, coordination and cooperation; that the P.T.A.'s have expressed an interest in it from the standpoint of safety of the children; that he thought if one project was going this would sell the rest of the community the idea of putting them in. Councilman Morehead stated the City's paveout policy only lasted as long as there were funds for that type of work; that he was sure if the City got involved in a curb, gutter and sidewalk program that the paveout would have to be included in the entire project. He asked if, due to the fact that there was no sidewalks, was not the school dis- trict furnishing transportation beyond the area required by law. Mr. Sutterfiela stated they were providing transportation beyond the State reimbursement distance; that the present transportation policy was established by the Board of Education and they would have to take this into considera- tion and make any changes; that it seemed to him the pave- out policy needed serious consideration; that it had encouraged the installation of curbs, gutters and side- Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1965-U02 06-U02 30-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116848-U03 DO116918-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/1/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 ADJOURNED-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1965 06 30 CC MINHÄ—@¸—/7Í«I Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council walks in the community; that if the decision was made to go piecemeal the City, if at all possible, should continue its paveout policy even if it necessitated the City finding an additional source of revenue to finance this policy; that he was not advocating this but saying that it should be considered. Mr. Gilmer suggested that an article be put in the City's Newsletter telling the citizens how to go about putting in curbs, gutters and sidewalks. Mr. King stated the Planning Commission was waiting for a report from the staff concerning the financing; that they felt at the time this was discussed that the schools would be the best source of communication. Mr. Stafford suggested putting in the sidewalks in areas that already have curbs and gutters as a pilot program. Mr. Thomas stated he had maintained that the schools were one of the first places that should be started; that he would like to see a program of curbs, gutters and sidewalks started working out from each high school in all directions. Councilman McCaron asked if there was not some aid that could be acquired from the State on an overall program. Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated he did not know whether there was unless the street was in the project also; that he only knew of one federal program where there were outright grants available and this was Urban Renewal. Councilman McCaron stated as a matter of clarification, he meant to use the funds that would be acquired for the curbs, gutters and sidewalks to be used in conjunction with the street paving as one overall program and then acquire funds to take care of the paveout and use these as matching funds. Discussion followed regarding Urban Renewal. Councilman McCaron stated each property benefited should be assessed for the curbs, gutters and sidwalks, and the City should work for a program to pay for the paveout such as a bond issue or financing the overall program; that he did not think the program should be done piecemeal; that it should be all done or let it go on as it was now. Councilwoman Gregory stated, in her opinion, the general obligation bond would never work for this project and she asked about Community Redevelopment funds. Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated quite a number of communities had organized their own authority to obtain federal grants and still control it locally; that there was another program that was totally local without regard to federal funds. Councilwoman Gregory stated perhaps a study could be made of this. Mr. Markell stated that for a number of years he had served on the planning Commission of South El Monte; that they had undergone this problem and had projected a long range capital improvement project including curbs and gutters and paveout of the street; that they split up into districts, and the interested citizens petitioned on a majority rule basis, and the City split the cost with the property owners who did not already have the improve- ments in on the basis that those who benefited gave so much for the curb, gutter and paveout and the City gave so much; that Mr. Dave Brown, City Manager, would be glad to discuss Continued) June 30, 1965 Page 5 A BIB] 39576-U01 1965-U02 06-U02 30-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116848-U03 DO116918-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/1/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 ADJOURNED-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1965 06 30 CC MINHÄ—@¸—/7Í«Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council progress in that area; that South El Monte had recently been given a presidential citation for improvement and cleanup. In answer to a question by Councilman McCaron, City Engineer French stated if all of the streets were paved out about twenty-five percent 25%) of the amount presently budgeted would have to be used for maintenance; that the amount presently budgeted was inadequate for complete preventive maintenance. Mr. Hub H. Bloxham, 4623 N. Maine, Baldwin Park, stated he did not believe the City's budget would stand making the additional hookups; that to get the job done he thought it would be necessary to have a bond issue that was a workable program; that if the City had to take the men off the street that needed repair today to make these hookups, one street would be neglected to fix the other; that he would suggest the 1911 Act or have a recommendation from the Chief Administrative Officer. Discussion followed that dedications should be expedited; the possibility of trying to obtain the nondedicated streets for public street use and ownership and that more study and planning was necessary to see how to facilitate the matter. Mayor Crites stated he and the Planning Director had discussed the necessity of a program to realign some of the streets that have odd jogs, to have the street names continuous and to create new streets to open up small areas. Concerning the creation of new streets, Mr. King stated the City Attorney stated this could be accomplished by the 1911 Act. Mayor Crites stated that a program should be started for the elimination of some of the substandard buildings. Chief Administrative Officer Nordby cited a court case the City had filed regarding a substandard building which had not proven satisfactory for the City. He stated that a revised public nuisance ordinance would be presented to the Council at the next regular meeting. Further discussion followed regarding cleanup. Mr. Cannady asked if the City was going to have the authority to have the necessary cleanup accomplished and charge it to the tax bill. Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated the ordinance as designed appeared workable; that after the prescribed length of time the City could move in and either contract for the work to be done or do it with City forces; that the City might have to advance funds to pay the contractor but in a year or less this would be reimbursed from the taxes paid on the property. Mr. Caproni stated the Planning Commission was in the pro- cess of revising the R-I, R-2 and R-3 zoning particularly taking into consideration the deep lot problems in the R-I zone; that a new zone was to be created, the M-R Zone, for a buffer zone between industrial and R-1; that public hearings had been held and a public hearing would be initiated for another new zoning for highrise. He stated that the Planning Commission did want to pursue the curb, gutter, sidewalk and street alighment program getting together all of the informa- tion available to make a recommendation. He asked how much June 30, 1965 Page 6 HUB H. BLOXHAM, 14623 N. Maine, B.Pk. PROGRAM NEEDED TO REALIGN SOME OF STREETS, TO HAVE STREET NAMES CON- TINUOUS AND TO CREATE NEW STREETS TO OPEN UP SMALL AREAS PROGRAM NEEDED FOR ELIMINATION OF SUBSTANDARD BUILDINGS PUBLIC NUISANCE ORD. P.C. STUDYING OF M-R AND HIGHRISE ZONING Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1965-U02 06-U02 30-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116848-U03 DO116918-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/1/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 ADJOURNED-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1965 06 30 CC MINHÄ—@¸—/7Í«Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council June 30, 1965 1 z Page 7 I I It would cost to get a professional opinion as to how much longer the present Civic Center facility would be adequate as far as the growth of the City was concerned and how much area would be needed for a Civic Center. Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated the City was staffed for maintenance; that a consultant's fee could be $2,000.00 to $3,000.00; that the City could invite a con- sultant to discuss this at no charge and probably arrive at a figure which would provide the answer to this question. Mr. Thomas stated that consulting firms were all right for guide lines but the City officials were hired to run the City, and they were very competent to take care of these things. Mr. Cannady asked if the public nuisance ordinance would have a demolition clause in it. He stated the public utility companies had economic, commercial and industrial development consultants available; that the public utility companies were particularly interested in the industrial property available and were also interested in helping the City develop what they already had; that their consultating services were free and they had offered this service to the Chamber of Commerce and to the City. In answer to Mayor Crites, Building Superintendent Kalbfieisch stated eight to ten properties were being posted a week; that last year seventy-two houses were condemned. Chief Administrative Officer Nordby, in answer to Mr. Cannady, stated that the Uniform Building Code was already set up for condemnation of structures under Section 203. Mr. Kallemeyn asked who would be the determining factor as to whether or not cases would go to court; that he was very hesitant about something that would circumvent people's rights. Mayor Crites stated that sometimes he felt some of these matters were not circumventing the courts, they were just not getting up to that particular level to utilize the court services. Further discussion followed. Mr. Gilmer stated he would like to see the public educated concerning this process. Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated the action pro- posed by the ordinance would be very slow including resolutions, public hearings, determinations by the Council and expert witnesses involved. He stated that the individual always had recourse to the courts. Mayor Crites stated he appreciated the attendance of all of those that were here, the help and the attention given to these matters. Mayor Crites stated that there should be a perpetual cleanup instead of just an annual cleanup; that perhaps the County would paint the tin barn if the City made an effort to clean up its end of the town; that a parking district had PARKING DISTRICT been discussed a number of times and was under study at the present time; that just recently the City had moved PARK AND RECREA- into a recreation program; that the acquisition of the access TION to the proposed park site along the flood control channel had been arranged and would be available before too much longer for some improvements along the lines of a day park, walk in park, picnic type facility. He mentioned legislation pending requiring park facilities for new subdivisions. Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1965-U02 06-U02 30-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116848-U03 DO116918-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/1/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 ADJOURNED-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1965 06 30 CC MINHÄ—@¸—/7Í«Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council June 30, 1965 a3 Page 8 Mr. Markell asked if there was a committee conducting an aggressive investigation concerning monies that could be acquired for capital improvement programs and mentioned that the proposed cigarette tax was one possible source of revenue. Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated the cigarette tax bill, AB 1615, had passed both houses; that it was awaiting the Governor's signature; that this bill would call for $.02 additional tax per package for counties and cities providing that particular county or city passed an ordinance which levied the tax. Mr. Francis J. Gregory, t529 North Walnut, Baldwin Park, FRANCIS J. GREGORY, commented that some cities such as West Covina were taxing 4529 N. Walnut, so much on top of the building permit for recreational B.Pk. purposes; that this was used for improvement of the existing parks and land acquisition. Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated if the Council STAFF TO SET UP and Boards wished the staff would set up the priorities PRIORITY LIST discussed taking into consideration the statements made AND REPORT tonight and detail it using various means of financing and stating the way the staff thought it should be financed subject to the Council and Boards consideration; that the staff would be very happy to schedule the programs and establish target dates and deadlines as to when a project could be begun and estimates as to the completion dates. Mr. King asked how soon the Planning Commission could have this report. Chief Administrative Officer Nordby indicated he hoped the report could be ready sometine in August. Mr. Caproni stated the Planning Commission was willing and ready to further discuss this program and have extra meetings. Councilwoman Gregory stated she hoped there could be another joint meeting in approximately one and one-half to two months for further discussion. Mr. Markell stated it was his opinion that a fine program had been outlined; that it was aggressive and ambitious; that some of the matters would have to have long range planning; that he thought there should be also aggressive work on means for additional income other than direct taxation of the property owners; that possibly some of the answer might be further promotion of the commercial and industrial property in the City. Mayor Crites stated he would also like to see the City boundary RE CITY BOUNDARY lines extended; that he was well aware that some of the matters discussed tonight could not be realized for possibly ten or twenty years; that he would like to see the Planning Commission and the various Boards and persons present begin to put some of their thinking together in concrete form and present it to the Council for action or at least have it ready for the next discussion. 00- AT 9:27 P.M. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADJ. AT 9:27 P.M. ADJOURN. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY SECONDED. There were no objections, the motion carried and was so ordered by Mayor Crites. 00 lz= IVORY D. P RITES, MAYOR THELMA L. BALKUS, CITY CLERK APPROVED: August 4 1965. Date of Distribution to City Council July 30 1965. Date of Distribution to Departments August 2 1965. BIB] 39576-U01 1965-U02 06-U02 30-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116848-U03 DO116918-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/1/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 ADJOURNED-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06