HomeMy WebLinkAbout1965 06 30 CC MIN1965 06 30 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— / 7Í«ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL JUNE 30, 1965
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER) 1L403 East Pacific Avenue 7:30 P.M.
I
The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park met in adjourned
regular session at the above place at 7:30 P.M.
Mayor Crites led the salute to the flag. FLAG SALUTE
Roll Call: Present: COUNCILMEN ADAIR, GREGORY, ROLL CALL
MCCARON, MOREHEAD AND MAYOR
CRITES
Planning Commission
Members Present: GERALDI, GILMER, KALLEMEYN,
KING, THOMAS AND CHAIRMAN
CAPRONI Sutterfield arrived
at 7:Lf.2 p.m.)
Board of Zoning
Adjustments
Members Present: CANNADY, MCGOWAN, MARKELL
AND STAFFORD Chairman Dargus
arrived at 7:)40 p.m.)
Also Present: CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER
NORDBY, CITY ENGINEER FRENCH,
BUILDING SUPERINTENDENT
KALBFLEISCH, PLANNING DIRECTOR
CHIVETTA, FINANCE DIRECTOR
DUNCAN AND CITY CLERK BALKUS
Absent: CITY ATTORNEY FLANDRICK, CHIEF
OF POLICE ADAMS AND CITY
TREASURER PUGH
00-
Chief Administrative Officer Nordby presented Resolution RES. NO. 65-111
Numbers 65-I11 and 65-112 stating that No. 65-I11 was a
resolution for claims and demands; that No. 65-112 was
the final budget adjustment for 1964-65; that there was
no change as far as the budget was concerned in the total
appropriation; that there was deviation from his recommenda-
tion concerning the acquisition of the park site along the RE PARK SITE
Big Dalton Wash from the Flood Control; that at the time ACQUISITION
this came up some months ago the staff was not sure whether BIG DALTON WASH
the General Fund could stand the $21,750.00, and he had
suggested that if it could not the money would be taken out
of unappropriated surplus, however it had not been necessary
to touch the investments and this was paid from the General
Fund.
Discussion followed regarding the striping machine, Warrant WARRANT NO. 6181
No. 6181, wherein Finance Director Duncan stated that Wald
Industries furnished the City with the equipment approximately
six months ago but had agreed to bill the City in June.
City Clerk Balkus presented Resolution No. 65-III entitled: RES. NO. 65-III
ALLOWING CLAIMS AND
RESOLUTION NO. 65-111 DEMANDS AGAINST CITY
OF B.PK.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ALLOWING PAYROLL NOS. 1315-
CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY 1436 INCL.
OF BALDW I N PARK"
GENERAL NOS. 6133-
6187 INCL. AND f 3)
Continued)
BIB]
39576-U01
1965-U02
06-U02
30-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116848-U03
DO116918-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/1/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1965 06 30 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— / 7Í«Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council June 30, 1965
Page 2
COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 65-ill BE RES. NO. 65-ill
APPROVED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN ADOPTED
MCCARON SECONDED. The motion carried by the following
vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN MOREHEAD, MCCARON, ADAIR,
GREGORY AND MAYOR CRITES
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
City Clerk Balkus presented Resolution No. 65-112 entitled: RES. NO. 65-112
AMENDING RES. 64-I49
RESOLUTION NO. 65-112 RELATING TO CERTAIN
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING
RESOLUTION 64-149 RELATING TO CER-
TAIN BUDGETARY APPROPRIATIONS"
BUDGETARY APPROPRIA-
TIONS
COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 65-112 BE RES. NO. 65-112
APPROVED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILWOMAN ADOPTED
GREGORY SECONDED. The motion carried by the following
vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN MOREHEAD, GREGORY, ADAIR,
MCCARON AND MAYOR CRITES
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
00-
City Clerk Balkus stated that Lot Split No. 298 was approved RE L.S. NO. 298
by the City Council in November, 1960; that the original
owner Holt" no longer owned the property; that Parcel A"
was in one ownership and Parcels 8" and C" were in another
ownership; that Parcel A" was in escrow at the present time;
that the lot split agreements of 1960 required either installa-
tion of future street improvements or deposit for same when
required by the City Engineer; that the realtor had con-
tacted the City Clerk's office, and the buyer agreed to pay
$70.00, or approximately 10%, as estimated by Dwight French,
City Engineer, as assessment on Parcel A"; that before escrow
could be closed the title company requests a release that can
be recorded as the present agreement was a lien against the
property; that $70.00 would cover the assessment for the front
parcel; that Mr. Jordan, the new purchaser, had made the $70.00
deposit.
COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT VIRGIL A. JORDAN'S THE PRESENT MOTION MADE AND
OWNER OF PARCEL A" IN LOT SPLIT NO. 298 APPROVED ON NOVEM- CARRIED THAT VIRGIL A.
BER 17, 1960) SHARE OF THE FUTURE STREET IMPROVEMENTS IS IN JORDAN'S THE PRESENT
THE SUM OF $70.00, AND UPON PAYMENT TO THE CITY OF SAID SUM, OWNER OF PARCEL A"
SAID PARCEL A" AND VIRGIL A. JORDAN, BE, AND THE SAME HEREBY IN LS NO. 298, AP-
ARE RELEASED FROM FURTHER OBLIGATIONS UNDER THAT CERTAIN PROVED ON NOV. 17,
AGREEMENT DATED NOVEMBER lii., 1960, BETWEEN THE CITY OF 1960) SHARE OF FUTURE
BALDWIN PARK AND OTIS D. HOLT AND MADGE HOLT. COUNCIL- STREET IMPROVEMENTS
WOMAN GREGORY SECONDED. The motion carried by the following IS IN THE SUM OF
vote: $70.00, AND UPON PAY-
MENT TO THE CITY OF
AYES: COUNCILMEN MOREHEAD, GREGORY, ADAIR, SAID SUM, SAID
MCCARON AND MAYOR CRITES PARCEL A" AND VIRGIL
NOES: NONE A. JORDAN, BE, AND
ABSENT: NONE THE SAME HEREBY ARE
RELEASED FROM FUR-
THER OBLIGATIONS
UNDER THAT CERTAIN
AGREEMENT DATED NOV. ILa.,
1960, BETWEEN THE CITY
OF BALDWIN PARK AND
OTIS D. HOLT AND
MADGE HOLT
00-
BIB]
39576-U01
1965-U02
06-U02
30-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116848-U03
DO116918-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/1/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1965 06 30 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— / 7Í«Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council
Mayor Crites stated that the main purpose of the meeting was to
discuss plans for capital improvement; that this would come
under the heading of New Business; that on January 12, 1965,
the members of the Planning Commission received a two page
letter from the Chief Administrative Officer regarding a
meeting to discuss informally the relationship between the
various members of the City Staff and the Planning Commis-
sion; that with this there were several items discussed
including the change from A-1 to R-l zoning; and it was
said that while matters of zoning and subdivision would
still occupy the Planning Commission's time or some part of
it the Board of Zoning Adjustments would relieve the
Commission of some of the detail problems and allow more time
to be devoted to planning for the physical development of
the city. He stated there was another letter dated March 9,
1965, regarding the Capital Improvement Program and another
letter dated June 28, 1965, regarding initiating a Capital
Improvement Program.
He further stated that the remainder of the meeting would
be an open discussion on the subject of planning; that
he wanted the group to have some ideas together not only
for planning for this year or next year but for ten years
or more in the future.
Mrs. Dargus asked how long it took to set up for a bond
election.
Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated there were
certain requirements for setting up a special election
with which the City Clerk was quite familiar; that the
past experience in Baldwin Park was somewhat dismal
with regard to bond issues, but it did not mean that a
bond issue would necessarily fail; that the time consuming
element was educating the people as to the purpose of the
election and the benefits the City would derive from the
funds once the bonds were authorized; that it would take
approximately three to six months merely in a program of
education.
Mayor Crites stated he had an indication that the Planning
Commission had established a priority list for projects they
would like to see accomplished.
Chairman Caproni stated it was the consensus of the Planning
Commission at the time of their discussion that curbs,
gutters, and sidewalks were the most important. He stated
that it should be determined whether the entire City should
be done at once, a district at a time or start from the
schools and work out. He stated that the Chamber of
Commerce had a committee set up to study this matter;
that he thought a majority of the citizens would like
to have curbs, gutters, and sidewalks; however it was
a matter of educating the people of the benefits they
could derive balanced against the cost of the project.
He stated the manner of financing would have to be deter-
mined such as by general bond or just encouraging the
citizens to put them in.
Mayor Crites stated perhaps this could be started by a
survey from the Planning Director or City Engineer as
to which streets needed curbs, gutters, and sidewalks
and what amount was already in.
Mr. King stated the Planning Commission had just initiated
a study on underground utilities; that Glendora and several
other cities were initiating an ordinance to have the
utilities parallel the sidewalks and not go under them.
05
June 30, 196,5
Page 3
MTG. TO DISCUSS
CAPITAL IMPROVE-
MENT PLANS FOR
CAPITAL IMPROVE-
MENT LETTER FROM
C.A.O. DATED
JAN 12, 1965 RE
MTG. TO DISCUSS
RELATIONSHIP
BETNEEN VARIOUS
MEMBERS OF CITY
STAFF AND P.C.
LETTER DATED MAR. 9,
1965, RE CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PRO-
GRAM
LETTER DATED
JUNE 28, 1965, RE
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM
MTG. TO BE DISC.
ON SUBJECT OF
PLANNING
RE BOND ELECTION
P.C. PRIORITY
LIST FOR PRO-
JECTS
CGS ITEM I
RE UNDERGROUND
UTILITIES
Continued)
BIB]
39576-U01
1965-U02
06-U02
30-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116848-U03
DO116918-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/1/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1965 06 30 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— / 7Í«Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council June 30, 1965
Page 4
Chief Administrative Officer Nord by stated that Item No. 2 STREET LIGHTING
on the Planning Commission's list was Street Lighting ADDING AND UPGRAD-
adding and upgrading; that he had discussed this with the ING ITEM NO. 2
City Attorney and was hoping to have before the Council
for the meeting of July 7, 1965, the necessary resolution
to start a dissolution of the two lighting districts that
now existed in Baldwin Park.
Mayor Crites stated the third item was the Civic Center CIVIC CENTER
exclusive of the site; that this was something that would EXCLUSIVE OF SITE
take long range planning; that the plans could be begun; ITEM NO. 3
that there were many ways to obtain property and financing;
that the Planning Commission had a minimum of six acres
proposed.
Councilman Morehead, regarding Item No. 1, asked how the RE CGS ITEM I
plan of the Chamber of Commerce was progressing.
Mr. Sutterfield stated he was a member of the committee of
which Mr. Bloxham was Chairman; that he thought the
consensus of opinion from the meeting was that for the
curb, gutter and sidewalk program to be effective it should
cover large areas of the community rather than small piecemeal
work which they estimated would take twenty 20) years to
do; that they ran into financing problems; one was the pave-
out policy of the City; that if large portions were undertaken
the present policy the City had would not be able to be
financed on a current year to year basis as it was presently
financed; that there were two or more plans discussed; that
one was dividing the City into perhaps six districts and
getting interested citizens to circulate petitions in order
to petition the Council to set up a district, either 1911 or
1913 Act; that to solve the City's finances in paving out
they considered the possibility of a bond issue to go City
wide which would include the financing of connecting the
streets to the curbs; that they were almost stalemated until
something could be resolved with regard to what extent the
City would be able to participate in paveout if the project
went piecemeal.
Mr. Cannady stated there might be some friction if the curbs,
gutters and sidewalks were put in on a general obligation
bond by the people who have already put in curbs, gutters
and sidewalks and because of them have been paying higher
taxes; that it might be considered to include the cost of
the paveout as part of the curb, gutter and sidewalk expense and
have the property owner pay a prorated portion; that this
was something that was not going to be done overnight, and
the City might start accumulating funds to be able to keep
up with the program if it was determined that the City would
pay for the paveout; that this program was going to take a
lot of work, coordination and cooperation; that the P.T.A.'s
have expressed an interest in it from the standpoint of
safety of the children; that he thought if one project was
going this would sell the rest of the community the idea
of putting them in.
Councilman Morehead stated the City's paveout policy only
lasted as long as there were funds for that type of work;
that he was sure if the City got involved in a curb, gutter
and sidewalk program that the paveout would have to be
included in the entire project. He asked if, due to the
fact that there was no sidewalks, was not the school dis-
trict furnishing transportation beyond the area required
by law.
Mr. Sutterfiela stated they were providing transportation
beyond the State reimbursement distance; that the present
transportation policy was established by the Board of
Education and they would have to take this into considera-
tion and make any changes; that it seemed to him the pave-
out policy needed serious consideration; that it had
encouraged the installation of curbs, gutters and side-
Continued)
BIB]
39576-U01
1965-U02
06-U02
30-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116848-U03
DO116918-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/1/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1965 06 30 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— / 7Í«I
Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council
walks in the community; that if the decision was made to
go piecemeal the City, if at all possible, should continue
its paveout policy even if it necessitated the City finding
an additional source of revenue to finance this policy; that
he was not advocating this but saying that it should be
considered.
Mr. Gilmer suggested that an article be put in the City's
Newsletter telling the citizens how to go about putting
in curbs, gutters and sidewalks.
Mr. King stated the Planning Commission was waiting for a
report from the staff concerning the financing; that they
felt at the time this was discussed that the schools would
be the best source of communication.
Mr. Stafford suggested putting in the sidewalks in areas
that already have curbs and gutters as a pilot program.
Mr. Thomas stated he had maintained that the schools were
one of the first places that should be started; that he
would like to see a program of curbs, gutters and sidewalks
started working out from each high school in all directions.
Councilman McCaron asked if there was not some aid that could
be acquired from the State on an overall program.
Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated he did not know
whether there was unless the street was in the project also;
that he only knew of one federal program where there were
outright grants available and this was Urban Renewal.
Councilman McCaron stated as a matter of clarification, he
meant to use the funds that would be acquired for the curbs,
gutters and sidewalks to be used in conjunction with the
street paving as one overall program and then acquire funds
to take care of the paveout and use these as matching funds.
Discussion followed regarding Urban Renewal.
Councilman McCaron stated each property benefited should
be assessed for the curbs, gutters and sidwalks, and the
City should work for a program to pay for the paveout
such as a bond issue or financing the overall program;
that he did not think the program should be done piecemeal;
that it should be all done or let it go on as it was now.
Councilwoman Gregory stated, in her opinion, the general
obligation bond would never work for this project and she
asked about Community Redevelopment funds.
Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated quite a number
of communities had organized their own authority to
obtain federal grants and still control it locally;
that there was another program that was totally local
without regard to federal funds.
Councilwoman Gregory stated perhaps a study could be
made of this.
Mr. Markell stated that for a number of years he had
served on the planning Commission of South El Monte; that
they had undergone this problem and had projected a
long range capital improvement project including curbs
and gutters and paveout of the street; that they split up
into districts, and the interested citizens petitioned
on a majority rule basis, and the City split the cost with
the property owners who did not already have the improve-
ments in on the basis that those who benefited gave so much
for the curb, gutter and paveout and the City gave so much;
that Mr. Dave Brown, City Manager, would be glad to discuss
Continued)
June 30, 1965
Page 5
A
BIB]
39576-U01
1965-U02
06-U02
30-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116848-U03
DO116918-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/1/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1965 06 30 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— / 7Í«Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council
progress in that area; that South El Monte had recently been
given a presidential citation for improvement and cleanup.
In answer to a question by Councilman McCaron, City Engineer
French stated if all of the streets were paved out about
twenty-five percent 25%) of the amount presently budgeted
would have to be used for maintenance; that the amount
presently budgeted was inadequate for complete preventive
maintenance.
Mr. Hub H. Bloxham, 4623 N. Maine, Baldwin Park, stated he
did not believe the City's budget would stand making the
additional hookups; that to get the job done he thought
it would be necessary to have a bond issue that was a
workable program; that if the City had to take the men
off the street that needed repair today to make these
hookups, one street would be neglected to fix the other;
that he would suggest the 1911 Act or have a recommendation
from the Chief Administrative Officer.
Discussion followed that dedications should be expedited;
the possibility of trying to obtain the nondedicated streets
for public street use and ownership and that more study and
planning was necessary to see how to facilitate the matter.
Mayor Crites stated he and the Planning Director had
discussed the necessity of a program to realign some of the
streets that have odd jogs, to have the street names
continuous and to create new streets to open up small
areas.
Concerning the creation of new streets, Mr. King stated the
City Attorney stated this could be accomplished by
the 1911 Act.
Mayor Crites stated that a program should be started for the
elimination of some of the substandard buildings.
Chief Administrative Officer Nordby cited a court case the
City had filed regarding a substandard building which had
not proven satisfactory for the City. He stated that a
revised public nuisance ordinance would be presented to the
Council at the next regular meeting.
Further discussion followed regarding cleanup.
Mr. Cannady asked if the City was going to have the authority
to have the necessary cleanup accomplished and charge it
to the tax bill.
Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated the ordinance as
designed appeared workable; that after the prescribed
length of time the City could move in and either contract
for the work to be done or do it with City forces; that
the City might have to advance funds to pay the contractor
but in a year or less this would be reimbursed from the
taxes paid on the property.
Mr. Caproni stated the Planning Commission was in the pro-
cess of revising the R-I, R-2 and R-3 zoning particularly
taking into consideration the deep lot problems in the R-I
zone; that a new zone was to be created, the M-R Zone, for
a buffer zone between industrial and R-1; that public hearings
had been held and a public hearing would be initiated for
another new zoning for highrise. He stated that the Planning
Commission did want to pursue the curb, gutter, sidewalk and
street alighment program getting together all of the informa-
tion available to make a recommendation. He asked how much
June 30, 1965
Page 6
HUB H. BLOXHAM,
14623 N. Maine,
B.Pk.
PROGRAM NEEDED TO
REALIGN SOME OF
STREETS, TO HAVE
STREET NAMES CON-
TINUOUS AND TO
CREATE NEW STREETS
TO OPEN UP SMALL
AREAS
PROGRAM NEEDED
FOR ELIMINATION
OF SUBSTANDARD
BUILDINGS
PUBLIC NUISANCE
ORD.
P.C. STUDYING
OF M-R AND
HIGHRISE ZONING
Continued)
BIB]
39576-U01
1965-U02
06-U02
30-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116848-U03
DO116918-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/1/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1965 06 30 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— / 7Í«Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council June 30, 1965 1 z
Page 7
I
I
It would cost to get a professional opinion as to how much
longer the present Civic Center facility would be adequate
as far as the growth of the City was concerned and how
much area would be needed for a Civic Center.
Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated the City was
staffed for maintenance; that a consultant's fee could be
$2,000.00 to $3,000.00; that the City could invite a con-
sultant to discuss this at no charge and probably arrive
at a figure which would provide the answer to this question.
Mr. Thomas stated that consulting firms were all right for
guide lines but the City officials were hired to run the
City, and they were very competent to take care of these
things.
Mr. Cannady asked if the public nuisance ordinance would
have a demolition clause in it. He stated the public
utility companies had economic, commercial and industrial
development consultants available; that the public utility
companies were particularly interested in the industrial
property available and were also interested in helping the
City develop what they already had; that their consultating
services were free and they had offered this service to the
Chamber of Commerce and to the City.
In answer to Mayor Crites, Building Superintendent Kalbfieisch
stated eight to ten properties were being posted a week;
that last year seventy-two houses were condemned.
Chief Administrative Officer Nordby, in answer to Mr.
Cannady, stated that the Uniform Building Code was already
set up for condemnation of structures under Section 203.
Mr. Kallemeyn asked who would be the determining factor as
to whether or not cases would go to court; that he was very
hesitant about something that would circumvent people's
rights.
Mayor Crites stated that sometimes he felt some of these matters
were not circumventing the courts, they were just not
getting up to that particular level to utilize the
court services.
Further discussion followed.
Mr. Gilmer stated he would like to see the public educated
concerning this process.
Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated the action pro-
posed by the ordinance would be very slow including resolutions,
public hearings, determinations by the Council and expert
witnesses involved. He stated that the individual always
had recourse to the courts.
Mayor Crites stated he appreciated the attendance of all of
those that were here, the help and the attention given to
these matters.
Mayor Crites stated that there should be a perpetual cleanup
instead of just an annual cleanup; that perhaps the County
would paint the tin barn if the City made an effort to
clean up its end of the town; that a parking district had PARKING DISTRICT
been discussed a number of times and was under study at
the present time; that just recently the City had moved PARK AND RECREA-
into a recreation program; that the acquisition of the access TION
to the proposed park site along the flood control channel
had been arranged and would be available before too much
longer for some improvements along the lines of a day park,
walk in park, picnic type facility. He mentioned legislation
pending requiring park facilities for new subdivisions.
Continued)
BIB]
39576-U01
1965-U02
06-U02
30-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116848-U03
DO116918-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/1/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1965 06 30 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— / 7Í«Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council June 30, 1965
a3 Page 8
Mr. Markell asked if there was a committee conducting an
aggressive investigation concerning monies that could be
acquired for capital improvement programs and mentioned
that the proposed cigarette tax was one possible source
of revenue.
Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated the cigarette tax
bill, AB 1615, had passed both houses; that it was
awaiting the Governor's signature; that this bill would
call for $.02 additional tax per package for counties
and cities providing that particular county or city passed
an ordinance which levied the tax.
Mr. Francis J. Gregory, t529 North Walnut, Baldwin Park, FRANCIS J. GREGORY,
commented that some cities such as West Covina were taxing 4529 N. Walnut,
so much on top of the building permit for recreational B.Pk.
purposes; that this was used for improvement of the existing
parks and land acquisition.
Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated if the Council STAFF TO SET UP
and Boards wished the staff would set up the priorities PRIORITY LIST
discussed taking into consideration the statements made AND REPORT
tonight and detail it using various means of financing
and stating the way the staff thought it should be financed
subject to the Council and Boards consideration; that the
staff would be very happy to schedule the programs and
establish target dates and deadlines as to when a project
could be begun and estimates as to the completion dates.
Mr. King asked how soon the Planning Commission could have
this report.
Chief Administrative Officer Nordby indicated he hoped the
report could be ready sometine in August.
Mr. Caproni stated the Planning Commission was willing and
ready to further discuss this program and have extra meetings.
Councilwoman Gregory stated she hoped there could be another
joint meeting in approximately one and one-half to two months
for further discussion.
Mr. Markell stated it was his opinion that a fine program had
been outlined; that it was aggressive and ambitious; that
some of the matters would have to have long range planning;
that he thought there should be also aggressive work on
means for additional income other than direct taxation of
the property owners; that possibly some of the answer might
be further promotion of the commercial and industrial
property in the City.
Mayor Crites stated he would also like to see the City boundary RE CITY BOUNDARY
lines extended; that he was well aware that some of the
matters discussed tonight could not be realized for possibly
ten or twenty years; that he would like to see the Planning
Commission and the various Boards and persons present begin
to put some of their thinking together in concrete form and
present it to the Council for action or at least have it
ready for the next discussion.
00-
AT 9:27 P.M. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADJ. AT 9:27 P.M.
ADJOURN. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY SECONDED. There were no
objections, the motion carried and was so ordered by Mayor Crites.
00
lz=
IVORY D. P RITES, MAYOR
THELMA L. BALKUS, CITY CLERK
APPROVED: August 4 1965.
Date of Distribution to City Council July 30 1965.
Date of Distribution to Departments August 2 1965.
BIB]
39576-U01
1965-U02
06-U02
30-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116848-U03
DO116918-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/1/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06