Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1965 09 15 CC MIN1965 09 15 CC MINHÄ—@¸—/Í«2509 I REGULAR MEETING OF THE BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER) 14403 East Pacific Avenue In accordance with Section 2703 of the Municipal Code the City Council met in open meeting at 7:00 p.m. in the Conference Room for an informal session with the staff to be informed on regular agenda items. The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park met in regular session at the above place at 7:30 p.m. Mayor Crites led the salute to the flag. Roll Call: Present: COUNCILMEN ADAIR, GREGORY, MCCARON AND MAYOR CRITES Absent: COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD AND CITY TREASURER PUGH Also Present: CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER NORDBY, CITY ATTORNEY FLANDRICK, CITY ENGINEER FRENCH, BUILDING SUPERINTENDENT KALBrLE15CH, PLANNING DIRECTOR CHIV~TA, FINANCE DIRECTOR DUNCAN, CHIEF OF POLICE ADAMS AND CITY CLERK BALKUS 00- COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT THE MINUTES OF MARCH 23, 1964, AND SEPTEMBER I, 1965, BE APPROVED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. There were no objections, the motion carried and was so ordered by Mayor Crites. 00- COUNCILMAN MCCARON MOVED THAT THE CITY TREASURER'S REPORT OF AUGUST 31, 1965, BE RECEIVED AND FILED. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY SECONDED. There were no objections, the motion carried and was so ordered by Mayor Crites. 00- City Clerk Balkus called the Council's attention to a letter in the Agenda folders from Malcolm Lincoln requesting to speak under Oral Communications regarding extension of Loma Lane to Earl Avenue. Planning Director Chivetta stated the Council had in their Agenda folders Planning Commission Resolution No. PC 65-30 and related matters. Mr. Malcolm Lincoln 3924 Center Street, Baldwin Park, passed out copies of an enlarged map of the section. He stated that the topic was regarding the extension of Loma Lane through Mrs. Champion's property in line with general circulation system; that if the Council agreed to the extension Mrs. Champion would be involved with some financial difficulty; that the red section outlined indicated the Champion property at the present time; that there would be sufficient area for three lots at the present time but not if Loma Lane was extended on through; that the extension of Loma Lane would take approximately one-third 1/3) of her property; that there were some alternatives: one that the City Council turn down the recommendation of the Planning Commission and cause a deadend to exist at I.'rs. Champion's property; that this would be the most beneficial to her but might not be to the City; that the second alternative, probably the worst possibility for Mrs. Champion, was to have the Continued) SEPTEMBER 15, 1961 7:30 P.M. FLAG SALUTE ROLL CALL MINUTES OF MAR. 23, 1964, AND SEP- I, 1965 APPROVED AND FURTHER READ- ING WAIVED CITY TREASURER'S REPORT AS OF AUG. 31, 1965 RECEIVED AND FILED LETTER FROM MALCO[ LINCOLN REQUEST 1 Nc TO SPEAK UNDER ORAL COMMUNICA- TIONS P.C. RES. NO. PC 65-30 MALCOLM LINCOLN, 3924 Center St., B.Pk. PASSED OUT ENLARG{ MAP BIB] 39576-U01 1965-U02 09-U02 15-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116848-U03 DO116926-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1965 09 15 CC MINHÄ—@¸—/Í«2510 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council September 15, 1965 Page 2 City extend the street through and demand that she, in line with general practice, make the dedication and pay for all of the improvements including sidewalks on both sides; that these were the extreme alternates perhaps with some adjustments in between. Councilman McCaron asked if Mrs. Champion intended to lot split this property. Mr. Lincoln stated Mrs. Champion would like to do this eventually; that her present plan was to sell the property if she could and get the best price she could; that if she sold. the property as it was there would still be the problem for any developer. Discussion followed that there were no improvements on the lot needed for the extension of Loma Lane other the-;n a tool shed. Mr. Lincoln stated that Areo Construction had built new houses right up to her property on the northwest sice; that Loma Lane was now complete with sidewalks and f-us up to Mrs. Champion's property; that cars were tr:;„eling over her property from Loma Lane to Earl at the pr:~~.ent time; that Mrs.Champlon'S son had put up a barricade but it had been torn down; that on the surface this amount of dedication and improvements seemed to be unfair to demand of one piece of property. Mayor Crites stated to his knowledge there was no demand for street dedication and improvements until application was made for a lot split or improvements of a certain type. Mr. Lincoln stated if Mrs. Champion made application for a lot split into three 3) lots) it would probably be denied; that their original request was for the Planning Commission to make some alleviation and make a deadend there; that perhaps a long time ago Corak Street should have been pushed on through to Frazier; that Mrs. Champion was never informed about this kind of action taking place. subdivision that indicated Loma Lane) He asked if the Council could deliberate more or if the Council had to take action on Resolution No. PC 65-30 at this time. Councilman McCaron stated it did not appear that any action had to be taken at the present time; that the City should have some set program set up for handling this type of problem in future development; that he would like to have the Planning Director look into the lot split that faced Earl and see what the pending obligations were on that lot split, if any; and also on the subdivision on Corak Street and see what their their obligation was. He stated it appeared at the present time the street was designed to go through for circulation of traffic; that he did not know how it was in the other direction; that this should be set aside until further information was obtained. Planning Director Chivetta stated he had made a complete study of the problem; that in order for the street to go through in the southwesterly direction the property owner would have to dedicate a piece of land 50 x 450; that the properties along Corak, Earl and Cedar Circle were one subdivision; that the improvements and street dedication were made; that the properties between Loma Lane and Frazier, eight parcels, had been recently divided by two lot splits; that he had discussed the matter at length with Mrs. Champion and Mr. Lincoln; that there was no way three lots could be obtained short of redesigning the entire area;; that the problem was created by previous subdivisions; that at that particular Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1965-U02 09-U02 15-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116848-U03 DO116926-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1965 09 15 CC MINHÄ—@¸—/Í«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council time property owners within a three hundred 300) foot radius were not notified of proposed subdivisions therefore Mrs. Champion was not aware of a circulation element that might affect her property; that at the present time every- one within a three hundred 300) foot radius of a sub- division was notified and could voice their opinion for or against; that this was a situation that was inequitable; that the Planning Commission had studied the problem and made their determination. He read Section 3 of Resolution No. PC 65-30 stating what was suggested was that if Nir:s. Champion was willing to dedicate the street and pier; up one-half of the cost maybe the City could go along ind pick up the other one-half of the improvements, hotaever this was up to the legislative body and not up to the Planning Commission to decide. As there were no objections, Mayor Crites directed at this matter be held over for study and a definite r-cgm- mendation to be at the next regular meeting, October 6, 1965. Mr. Lincoln asked to be notified by mail of that meeting and if he would be allowed to speak at that time. Mayor Crites stated yes. 00- Mr. R. M. King, Proctor & Gamble, was not in the audience. 00- City Clerk Balkus read in full a letter from Ruby Hendricks dated September I, 1965, which requested an extension of six 6) months on CP-43 in order to get clearance from the State and County offices and on her loan and permits. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT AN EXTENSION OF SIX 6) MONTHS BE GRANTED TO APPLICANT MRS. RU3Y HENDRICKS ON THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CP-43 CONCERNING THE PROPERTY AT 3711-3717 FOSTER. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN GREGORY, ADAIR, MCCARON AND MAYOR CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD 00- City Attorney Flandrick presented Resolution No. 65-145 and 65-146 stating these resolutions would formalize action taken by the City Council at the last regular meeting. City Attorney Flandrick read Resolution No. 65-145 by title as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 65-145 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK APPROVING A RECORD OF SURVEY MAP NO. 3170 AREO HOMES, INC.)" COUNCILMAN ADAIR MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 65-145 BE APPROVED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: 2511 September 15, 19618." w' T Page 3 HELD OVER FOR STUDY AND DEFINITE RECCM- MENDAT ION TO BE AT NEXT REG. MTG. OCT. 6, 1965 R.M. KING, PROCTOR & GAMBLE NOT IN AUDIENCE REQUEST FOR 6 MONTHS EXTENSION CP-43 RUBY HENDRICKS MOTION MADE AND CARRIED THAT EXTEN- SION OF 6 MONTHS BE GRANTED TO APPLICANT MRS. RUBY HENDRICKS ON CP-43 CONCERNING PROPERTY AT 3711- 3717 FOSTER RES. NO. 65-145 APPROVING A RECORD OF SURVEY MAP NO. 3170 AREO HOMES INC.) RES. NO. 65-145 ADOPTED Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1965-U02 09-U02 15-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116848-U03 DO116926-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1965 09 15 CC MINHÄ—@¸—/Í«2512 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council September 15, 1965 Page 4 AYES: COUNCILMEN ADAIR, GREGORY, MCCARON AND MAYOR CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD City Attorney Flandrick read Resolution No. 65-146 by RES. NO. 65-146 title as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 65-146 APPROVING TENT. TRACT 25375 AREO HOMES, INC.) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK APPROVING A TENTATIVE TRACT 25375 AREO HOMES, INC.)" COUNCILMAN ADAIR MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 65-146 BE RES. NO. 65-146 APPROVED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN MCCARON SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: ADOPTED AYES: COUNCILMEN ADAIR, MCCARON, GREGORY AND MAYOR CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD 00- City Attorney Flandrick stated he had given each member REPORT BY CITY ATTY. of the Council a copy of his report entitled 1965 Legislation". 00- Regarding the Annexation No. 16) and Detachment between the City of Baldwin Park and the City of Irwindale, City Clerk Balkus stated that the Boundary Commission had approved the maps as presented; that they had been for- warded to the Local Agency Formation Commission but had been returned with the request that they be filed after September 17, 1965. Councilwoman Gregory stated after much reconsideration she was of the opinion that the previous action taken by the Council should be rescinded; that she did not think the full value of the land had been considered in connec- tion with the future San Gabriel Freeway and the fact that this was the only ingress and egress at that point into Baldwin Park; that all the City would be doing in connection with Los Angeles Street and Olive Street would be assuming the maintenance of these streets and acquiring no land. Discussion. RE 1965 LEGISLATION REPORT BY CITY CLERK RE ANNEXATION NO. 16) AND DETACHMENT BETWEEN CITY OF B.PK. AND CITY OF IRWINDALE COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT THE CITY CLERK BE DIRECTED MOTION MADE AND NOT TO FILE THE APPLICATION WITH THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION CARRIED THAT CITY COMMISSION AND ADVISE THE CITY OF IRWINDALE THAT THE CITY CLERK BE DIRECTED OF BALDWIN PARK DID NOT INTEND TO PROCEED WITH THE BOUNDARY NOT TO FILE APPLICA- EXCHANGE. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. The motion carried TION WITH LOCAL AGENC by the following vote: FORMATION COMMISSION AND ADVISE CITY OF AYES: COUNCILMEN GREGORY, ADAIR, MCCARON IRWINDALE THAT CITY AND MAYOR CRITES OF B.PK. DID NOT IN- NOES: NONE TEND TO PROCEED WITH ABSENT: COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD BOUNDARY EXCHANGE 00- Chief Administrative Officer Nordby reviewed his report C.A.O. REPORT ON on Resolution No. 65-143 and 65-144 concerning withdrawal RES. NO. 65-143 AND from the lighting districts stating it was explained in 65-144 his report that the city would gain some advantage by Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1965-U02 09-U02 15-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116848-U03 DO116926-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1965 09 15 CC MINHÄ—@¸—/Í«I Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council creating a locally controlled lighting district. He also reviewed a letter from the Southern California Edison Company dated September 13, 1965 regarding the formation of a municipal lighting district by the City of Baldwin Park. He also reviewed the present tax rates in the two existing County districts. He stated It was the staff recommendation that the City with-' draw from the two lighting districts creating one that was locally controlled; that the tax rate would be equalized; that the overhead would be reduced; that the tax rate had already been established by the County for the fiscal year 1965-66; that the new lighting district would not be effective until July 1, 1966; that it was hoped to include the re- mainder of the City in the lighting district so that they too could have lights; that the staff was now in the process of studying the number of lights that would be needed in the unlighted portion of the City; that Edison and the City's Engineering staff was now in the process of making a study on the cost of installing lights In the unlighted portion of the City; that it was his recommendation that the City Council hold 89601064ofauN6on65-143 and 65-144 over end adjourn to September 29, 1965, and meanwhile the staff would pre- pare for the City Council information on future costs. Mrs. Marianne Johnson, 3825 North Foster, Baldwin Park, stated the lighting districts were formed by the people themselves and they paid for the installation of the poles. She asked how the cost of the installation of the poles would be paid for in the unlighted portion of the City. Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated if the lights were installed on existing poles there was no cost to the property owners; that the tax rate levied would only be for maintenance and energizing; that where there were no poles the property owners involved in that particular area would pay for the installation of the poles at the cost of approximately $125.00 per pole; that installation cost would be the same. As there were no objections, Mayor Crites stated this matter would be held over. 00- City Clerk Backus administered the Oath to those in the audience desiring to be heard during the meeting. 00- City Clerk Balkus announced that the hour of 8:00 p.m. having arrived that it was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on Z-273, an application initiated by the Baldwin Park Planning Commission to initiate a change of zone from R-I single family residential) zone to C-I neighborhood commercial) zone or more restrictive use upon a parcel of land located at 14650 East Pacific Avenue. City Clerk Balkus stated that proper publication, postings, and mailings had been accomplished. Planning Director Chivetta presented a resume of the case stating that the owner of the property had applied to the Planning Commission to reclassify her property from R-I to R-3; that the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC 65-28 on July 28, 1965, denying the request; that due to extenuating circumstances outlined in the report the staff had recommended to the Planning Commission that they initiate a public hearing to reclassify the property to C-I; that the Planning Commission adopted Resolution Continued) 2513 September 15, 1965 Page 5 LETTER FROM SO. CALIF. EDISON CO. DATED SEPT. 13, 1965, RE FORMATION OF PUN. LIGHTING DISTRICT MARIANNE JOHNSON, 3825 N. Foster, B.Pk. MATTER HELD OVER OATH ADMINISTERED PUBLIC HEARING 8:00 P.M. Z-273, REQUESTING ZONE CHANGE FROM R-I TO C-I AT 14650 E. PACIFIC AVE., INITIATED BY B.PK. PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLICATION, POSTINGS, AND MAILINGS RESUME BIB] 39576-U01 1965-U02 09-U02 15-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116848-U03 DO116926-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1965 09 15 CC MINHÄ—@¸—/Í«a F1 is 2519 Regular Meeting of the Baldw'wn t City Council No. PC 65-33 on August 25, 1965, recommending approval from R-I to C-i. He pointed out an area map on the wall. As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak in behalf of or in opposition to Z-273, Mayor Crites declared the public hearing closed. Councilman McCaron asked if the ii~ten.t was to finish the C-I zoning to the wash. Planning Director Chivetta stated,thiS was one of the reasons; that the other reason was that the properties on that side of the street betweeh.t'he wash and Vineland were used as commercial at the present time. City Clerk Balkus read Ordinance No."*26 by title as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 426 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF SAID CITY, AND REZONING CERTAIN HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM ZONE R-I TO ZONE C-I ZONE CASE NO. Z-2731" COUNCILMAN MCCARON MOVED THAT FURTHER READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 426 BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. There were no objections, the motion carried and was so ordered by Mayor Crites. COUNCILMAN MCCARON MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 426 BE INTRO- DUCED. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN MCCARON, ADAIR, GREGORY AND MAYOR CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD 00- City Clerk Balkus announced that it was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on Z-274, an application submitted by F. Mamone and D. Gair for a zone change from Zone R-3 heavy multiple residential) to Zone C-2 heavy commercial) or more restrictive use upon parcels of land located at 3419 and 3427 Baldwin Park Boulevard and 13643 Foster Avenue. City Clerk Balkus stated that proper publication, postings and mailings had been accomplished. Planning Director Chivetta presented a resume of the case and stated that the Planning Commission had adopted Resolu- tion No. PC 65-36 on August 25, 1965, recommending approval. TESTIMONY IN BEHALF OF THE REQUEST WAS CALLED FOR BY MAYOR CRITES. Mr. Frank Mamone, 3427 Baldwin Park Boulevard, Baldwin Park, stated that they had applied for and were granted R-3 zoning; that they had made several attempts to improve the property but could not obtain financing due to the large vacancy factor throughout the City in the R-3 zone; that at the present time he had a potential carpet company that would go into this property if it were rezoned to C-2. September 15, 1965 Page 6 PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED ORD. NO. 426 AMENDING ZON. MAP OF SAID CITY, AND REZONING CERTAIN HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM ZONE R-I TO ZONE C-I ZONE CASE NO. Z-273 FURTHER READING OF ORD. NO. 426 WAIVED ORD. NO. 426 INTRODUCED PUBLIC HEARING Z-274, REQUESTING ZONE CHANGE FROM R-3 TO C-2 AT 3419 AND 3427 B.PK. BLVD., AND 13643 FOSTER AVE. F. MAMONE AND D. GAIF PUBLICATION, POSTINGS AND MAILINGS RESUME TESTIMONY IN BEHALF FRANK MAMONE, 3427 B.Pk. Blvd., B.Pk. Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1965-U02 09-U02 15-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116848-U03 DO116926-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1965 09 15 CC MINHÄ—@¸—/Í«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council Mrs. Frank Mamone, 3427 Baldwin Park Boulevard, Baldwin Park, stated if the funds were available she did not think It would be wise to build apartments because of the vacancy factor; that a carpet company would be a wise investment not just for themselves but for the City and community; that it was not a small scale operation; that there would be a showroom, an office and a storeroom; that it would be beneficial to the community. Mr. Edwin Elko, 13057 East Bess Avenue, Baldwin Park, 2SJLS September 15, l95" A Page 7 MRS. FRANK MAMONE, 3427 B.Pk. Blvd., B.Pk. EDWIN ELKO, 13057 stated he was in favor of good commercial businesses; E. Bess Ave., B.Pk. that he owned property to the north of the subject property; that he would like to see a major store go in; that he had hoped the City would have something like a Site Plan Review. Mr. James Q. Gibson, 13268 East Francisquito, Baldwin Park, JAMES Q. GIBSON, asked if this establishment would have rug cleaning or was 13268 E. Francis- it strictly sales. quito, B.Pk. Mrs. Frank Mamone stated it would be just sales. TESTIMONY IN OPPOSITION TO THE REQUEST WAS CALLED FOR BY TESTIMONY IN OPPOSI- MAYOR CRITES. TION Mr. William Crisp, 3432 Sparling Street, Baldwin Park, stated WM CRISP, 3432 he had been the record owner since July 30, 1964; that he was Sparling St., B.Pk. not notified of this hearing; that there was a letter that came to the house addressed to the prior owner; that he was against having a factory or any type of manufacturing across the fence from him; that his property would abut the subject property. City Clerk Backus stated the property owners list was furnished by the applicant taken from the latest Assessment Rolls. At the request of Mayor Crites, Planning Director Chivetta explained that manufacturing was not allowed in the commercial zone; that carpet sales would be a proper use in the C-2 zone. Mrs. Marianne Johnson, 3825 North Foster, Baldwin Park, MRS. MARIANNE JOHNSON' stated she could not say whether she was for or against 3825 N. Foster, B.Pk. this zone change but she was asking the Council to consider whether or not this would be spot zoning; that she wondered if it was considered that Baldwin Park Boulevard would go all commercial and from what area to what area, and was this being done because the City was in desperate need for commercial or was the overall plan for the City being considered. Mr. James Q. Gibson, asked if the zone change was granted JAMES Q. GIBSON would it be possible under the C-2 zoning to use this property for a rug cleaning plant. He stated personally he did not think it was good planning to put C-2 zoning in a good residential district with a potential of becom- ing a much better residential district; that he had checked on the location of some rug cleaning establishments and rug sales and almost all of them were not located in residential districts. Planning Director Chivetta stated the first zone where rug cleaning plants were permitted would be in the commercial-manufacturing zone; that they would not be permitted in the C-2 zone; that the only C-M zone in the community was on Azusa Canyon Road. Mr. Richard Winters, 3422 Sparling, Baldwin Park, stated RICHARD WINTERS, he lived behind the Mamone's property; that he was 3422 Sparting, B.Pk. opposed to any heavy commercial use because of the residential district and the upgrading of the property Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1965-U02 09-U02 15-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116848-U03 DO116926-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1965 09 15 CC MINHÄ—@¸—/Í«2516 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council right now. He asked about the chances of having the zoning changed again for heavier commercial or manufacturing if the rug place did not materialize. Planning Director Chivetta stated the applicant could apply for any zoning he so desired; that whether or not the Planning Commission would recommend approval or not was something that could be determined at this time. September 15, 1965 Page 8 Mr. Alvarez, 3423 Sparling, Baldwin Park, stated his MR. ALVAREZ, property was behind the Mamone's property; that he 3423 Sparling, B.Pk. thoroughly opposed the change of zone; that R-3 was bad enough because the highrise or even low level apart- ments in the area would change the classification; that with the school going in he was sure there would be more homes coming into that area; that It was an area that was building now; that a lot of the older homes were being destroyed and newer homes being built; that he was against industry of any sort moving into this area. Mr. Edwin Elko asked if used car lots were permitted EDWIN ELKO in the C-2 zone. Planning Director Chivetta stated that used car sales was permissible in the C-2 zone. Mr. Elko asked if it would be possible to approve the C-2 zoning but put an exclusion of used car sales. City Attorney Flandrick stated no it would not be possible; that any C-2 use would be permitted as set forth in the Code; that the fact that the applicants had indicated they intend at this time to put in a carpet establishment was not really relevant to this case; that the question was shall it be zoned C-2. IN REBUTTAL Mrs. Frank Mamone stated it was not their REBUTTAL intention to put in a used car lot; that they did not apply to have all of their property zoned for commercial use; that they only applied for 32G.68 foot which was the frontage on Baldwin Park Boulevard; that there was more than one-half acre between this property and say for instance the Alvarez home; that she hoped the Council would keep in mind that they had the property just sitting idle; that there was one and one-half acres of property involved; that there were at least Ywo acres adjoining their property which was involh,,i:d in this zone change; that this was another way of Jetting rid of the chickens; that the carpet company would not take up all of the property involved; that it would be a professional type building with other professions in it; that there was also professional buildings on Merced and Baldwin Park Boulevard and there was C-2 zoning down on Francisquito; that they were right in the middle of C-2 zoning and she understood that the man on the other side of Foster had applied for commercial zoning. As there was no one else in the audience desiring to PUBLIC HEARING speak in behalf of or in opposition to Z-274, Mayor DECLARED CLOSED Crites declared the public hearing closed. Z-274 Councilman McCaron asked what the staff recommendation was at the time the matter came up before the Planning Commission. Planning Director Chivetta stated the staff recommendation was for denial; that it was based on the findings that the proposed reclassification would not be compatible with the surrounding area and would create spot zoning. Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1965-U02 09-U02 15-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116848-U03 DO116926-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1965 09 15 CC MINHÄ—@¸—/ Í«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council Councilman McCaron asked what the Master Plan called for in this area. I Planning Director Chivetta stated the General Plan depicted low density single family residential for the future land use in the area. Councilwoman Gregory stated at that time the street had not been widened although she thought it had been in the process for twenty-five 25) years; that all of the people in the area she had talked with from one end of Baldwin Park Boulevard to the other all wished R-3 or commercial zoning. She questioned the exact area to be rezoned as set forth on the map. Planning Director Chivetta stated there were three parcels involved; that Mrs. Gair owned the two parcels fronting on Foster; that the Mamone's owned the parcel fronting on Baldwin Park Boulevard; that the shaded area on the map that stated R-3" and chickens" was the area being considered for reclassification. Councilwoman Gregory asked if this was one-half acre. September 15, 19 Page 9 As there were no objections, Mayor Crites declared the PUBLIC HEARING public hearing on Z-274 reopened. REOPENED Z-274 Mrs. Frank Mamone stated the one-half acre would be the remaining R-3 where they lived; that the commercial property would be the acre on Baldwin Park Boulevard and extend over to the corner which was about two acres; that there was still R-3 property behind the commercial zoning and R-3 property on the side which was Mr. Elko's and so it was not low density actually. Mayor Crites commented that that would be an interior lot and asked about access stating that no interior lot could be created under the present zoning regulations. Mrs. Mamone stated they would not want to split it; that they wanted to live there. Councilman McCaron asked if there had been a study made to determine whether additional C-2 zone was needed on Baldwin Park Boulevard at the present time. Planning Director Chivetta stated there had not been; that the Planning Commission had made a statement that because of the width of Baldwin Park Boulevard that possibly the area would be best suited for commercial or multiple. development instead of residential. Councilman McCaron stated it would appear at the present time that the rezoning of the property was premature; that there was sufficient land already zoned on Baldwin Park Boulevard in the vicinity of Francisquito and Baldwin Park Boulevard none of which had been developed except the four corners with service stations; that there was sufficient commercial zoning there to take care of a population increase of Baldwin Park for possibly the next ten 10) or fifteen 15) years; that to think of rezoning the entire length of Baldwin Park Boulevard to commercial zoning was nothing more than strip zoning; that it did not enhance or increase the value of the property adjacent; that the property was mostly R-I except for the recent R-3 that was allowed; that he thought the request should be denied. As there was no one else in the audience desiring to PUBLIC HEARING speak in behalf of or in opposition to Z-274, Mayor AGAIN DECLARED Crites again declared the public hearing closed. CLOSED Z-274 Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1965-U02 09-U02 15-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116848-U03 DO116926-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1965 09 15 CC MINHÄ—@¸—/ Í« 251$ Regular Meeting of the Baldwin,Park City Council September 15, 1965 Page 10 As there were no objections, Mayor Crites reopened the PUBLIC HEARING public hearing on Z-274 as Mr. Elko indicated he had REOPENED Z-274 further testimony to give. Mr. Edwin Elko stated he was in accord to some extent with Councilman McCaron except that it should remain residential and primarily residential one; that R-3 by itself with no commercial to service and support it was also poor thinking; that he would like to see a good balance of good commercial and R-3; that if there was R-3 and no businesses that was not good either. Councilman McCaron stated there was commercial zoning on the northwest corner of Baldwin Park Boulevard and Francisquito; that there was sufficient commercial zoning in proximity to this area to service this area for commercial; that if the population increased so that there was a demand for this property to become commercial in the future it should then be reconsidered. Mrs. Frank Mamone asked Councilman McCaron he accounted for the commercial zoning on Merced and Baldwin Park Boulevard, and the professional buildings rented out in such a short time since commercial zoning was granted. Councilman McCaron stated that was already commercial; that it had been granted years in the past. Mrs. Mamone stated the point that she was trying to get across was that everyone on Baldwin Park Boulevard noticed the speed with which these professiona! build- ings were rented out; that she was hoping the same thing would happen with them. MRS. FRANK MAMONE As there was no one else in the audience desiring to speak PUBLIC HEARING in behalf of or in opposition to Z-274, Mayor Crites again AGAIN DECLARED declared the public hearing closed. CLOSED Z-274 COUNCILMAN MCCARON MOVED THAT Z-274 BE DENIED. MOTION MADE Councilwoman Gregory stated she was wondering if a denial might be a little stringent and suggested send- ing this back to the Planning Commission. She stated she was not too pleased with the complete planning; that perhaps another zoning could be investig.Yc d such as C-1 or C-P. Councilman McCaron stated he felt that wherever there was an intrusion on a zoning that if an application is to be made it should be done under a zone variance, so that conditions could be set upon the development as necessary. Councilwoman Gregory asked City Attorney Flandrick If this zone change application could be granted C-1 or C-P. City Attorney Flandrick stated yes; that the notice was given as C-2 or more restrictive zone so the Council had the option of considering C-I or C-P; that in any of these cases it would have to go back to the Planning Commission for a report. Councilwoman Gregory stated she would suggest sending this case back to the Planning Commission for further study. Councilman McCaron asked if this application could be changed to a zone variance wherein City Attorney Flandrick stated, no. Councilwoman Gregory stated she believed the frontage of Baldwin Park Boulevard would go to commercial zoning in time. Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1965-U02 09-U02 15-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116848-U03 DO116926-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1965 09 15 CC MINHÄ—@¸—/ Í«x.519 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council September 15, 1965 Page II I I Councilman McCaron stated-he agreed that It might go in time but he thought It was premature at this time. The motion died for lack of a second. MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF SECOND COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT THIS CASE Z-274 BE RE- SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR FURTHER STUDY AND REPORT BACK AS TO SOME OTHER TYPE OF ZONING, C-I OR C-P. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote; MOTION MADE AND CARRIED THAT Z-274 BE RESUBMITTED TO P.C. FOR FORT;;'--R STUDY AND REPORT BACK AS TO SOME OTHE' AYES: COUNCILMEN GREGORY, ADAIR, MCCARON TYPE OF ZONING, C-I AND MAYOR CRITES OR C-P NOES: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD 00- City Clerk Backus announced that it was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on R-145, an appeal from denial of the Planning Commission, an application submitted by Z. Ciesiolkiewicz for relocation of a single family residence and detached garage with guest house from 38 Haven Street, Arcadia, to 3860 Bogart Avenue, Baldwin Park. City Clerk Balkus stated that proper publication, postings, and mailings had been accomplished. Planning Director Chivetta presented a resume of the case and stated that the Planning Commission had adopted Resolu- tion No. PC 65-32 on August 25, 1965, denying the request. He pointed out the map on the wall. He stated that the staff recommendation was that the City Council concur with PC 65-32. TESTIMONY IN BEHALF OF THE REQUEST WAS CALLED FOR BY MAYOR CRITES. Mr. Frederick W. Stearns stated his residence was in Beverly Hills but he also had a residence in Monterey Park at 1600 West Garvey Avenue. He passed out plans to the City Council stating they had been available last time" but were not shown to the Planning Commission apparently in time. He also showed photographs and prints 4 plans, 8 prints and a prospective colored). City Attorney Flandrick stated there was a lot split application on file but the lot split had not been approved by the Engineering Department so at this time any action would have to be deferred until the lot split had been completed. Mr. Stearns stated he understood that all matters had been cleared with the City Engineer's Office; that they had agreed to all the requirements; a thirty 30) foot dedication for the improvements that would be required ultimately; to pave or pay for the curbs, Sidewalks and the concrete approaches and post a bond; that all would be PUBLIC HEARING R-145, APPEAL FROM DENIAL OF P.C. REQUEST TO RELOCATE SINGLE FAMILY RESI- DENCE AND DETACHED GARAGE WITH GUEST HOUSE FROM 38 HAVEN ST., ARCADIA, TO 3860 BOGART AVE., B.PK., Z. CIESIOLKIEV PUBLICATION, POSTING AND MAILINGS RESUME TESTIMONY IN BEHALF FREDERICK W. STEARNS, 1600 W. Garvey Ave., Mont. Pk. LOT SPLIT APPLICATWOt' ON FILE BUT HAD NOT BEEN APPROVED BY ENGR. DEPT. CITY ATTY. OPINION THAT ANY ACTION WOUIC HAVE TO BE DEFERRED UNTIL LOT SPLIT COMPLETED Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1965-U02 09-U02 15-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116848-U03 DO116926-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1965 09 15 CC MINHÄ—@¸—/ 1965 09 15 CC MINHÄ—@¸—/ Í«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council saw fit to approve the relocation permit that action be deferred until the applicant had complied with the require- ments of the Engineering Department concerning the lot split, and possibly if the Council was going to consider it the plot plan could be included as an exhibit. and require compliance with it; that In addition if it were to be approved he would assume that Building Superintendent Kalbfleisch would recommend the amount of the bond to insure that any damage done to any public facility by the actual relocation of the structure itself would be guaranteed by way of payment, and also the guarantee that the structures.would comply In all respects with the Building, Electrical and all other Uniform Codes. I Mr. Stearns stated that Mr. Ciesiolklewicz did not want to pay the monies for effecting the putting in of the curbs, sidewalks, gutters and trees if he was not going to be permitted to go ahead and make the relocation; that an extension had been granted from the Department of Highways on removing the buildings; that he had obtained the route from the City Engineer's office and everything was in motion; that the Council's agreement today would allow them to complete every facet of the City's require- ments. 2521 September 15, 1965. Page 13 Mr. Sam Camarella, 3941 Harlan, Baldwin Park, stated he SAM CAMARELLA, 3941 was the selling salesman in this lot; that his owners Harlan, B.Pk. would not pay for the curb and gutter unless they were sure they would be able to sell the lot so that he could relocate the house on it; that the building would be an improvement to Bogart Street. Mr. Stearns stated there was an agreement between the owners and Mr. Ciesiolkiewicz relevant to the cost of the improve- ments; that Mr. Ciesiolklewicz was going to pay for the total improvements and put out the money for the entire one hundred 100) feet; that the amount would be deducted for the fifty 50) feet from the price of the lot. Councilman McCaron asked if this was the same plot plan that was presented to the Planning Commission stating it appeared different from the one in the Council Agenda folders. Planning Director Chivetta stated it was not; that this was the first time he had viewed this proposal; that it appeared that the plan met with the Codes of the City as for as the setback requirements. Councilman McCaron asked if the Executive Committee of the Planning Commission had viewed the property. Planning Director Chivetta stated no unless it had been viewed individually. Councilman McCaron stated from past experience usually houses that were over ten 10) years old were in such a condition that they did not enhance the area they were being moved to; that from the photographs of the building it appeared that It would require a considerable amount of improvement before it would actually be improving the appearance of the building itself, possibly even new roofing would be necessary or something of that sort; that possibly since there had been a change on the plot plan) it should be referred back to the Planning Commission, that the Council could not enter into the fact that the State sold a house and misrepresented it to the buyer; that the Council had to consider improving and upgrading the City. Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1965-U02 09-U02 15-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116848-U03 DO116926-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1965 09 15 CC MINHÄ—@¸—/Í«2522 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park city council City Attorney Flandrick stated that the City Council was free to refer this matter to the PlanningCommission but he suggested If this was done that the public hearing be continued because the Planning Commission could only make a report or comment on the revised plot plan; that they could not hold another hearing; that the Building Super- intendent would probably wish to see the revised plot plan since it certainly affected the Building Department. As there were no objections, Mayor Crites continued the public hearing on R-145) to October 6, 1965, and suggested in the interim that the Planning Commission be asked to give the City Council a report on the revised plot plan and also ask for comments from Building Super- intendent Kalbfleisch on the revised plan. Mr. Stearns stated that Building Superintendent Kalbfleisch and a gentleman in his office had looked at the sketch from which this plan was made before it was presented to the Planning Commission. Building Superintendent Kalbfleisch stated he had no knowledge of the new plans. 00- September 15, 1965 Page 14 P.H. CONTINUED ON R-145 TO OCT. 6, 1965, AND I N THE INTERIM P.C. TO BE ASKED TO GIVE CITY COUNCIL REPORT ON REVISED PLOT PLAN AND ALSO ASK FOR COMMENTS FROM BLDG. SUPT. KALBFLEISCH ON REVISED PLAN Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated that Resolution RE POSITION OF No. 65-147 would set up the position of Administrative Intern; ADMINISTRATIVE that this would replace the position of Draftsman in the INTERN Planning Department. Councilwoman Gregory asked if the resolution could state that it was a temporary part-time position. Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated yes; that it did replace a part-time, position; that there was only a certain amount of funds allocated in the budget and the position would automatically be eliminated when the funds were expended. It was decided to add a parenthetical statement directly ADDITICN TO RES_ under Administrative Intern" as follows: Temporary- TEMPORARY-PART-TIME' Part-time. Chief Administrative Officer Nordby further stated that the previous position of Draftsman was nonproductive; that the salary was such that the City could not get a qualified individual to respond to the application request; that the Administrative Intern position was somewhat experimental; that there was much information and many reports that the staff were requested to submit to the Council. Councilwoman Gregory stated she realized Planning Director Chivetta was short of help In the Planning Department; that she understood there was some backlogging of some of the recommendations and requests of the Planning Commission to the Planning Department because of this short handedness; that she knew the Chief Administrative Officer had stipulated other things Miss Midland would do but actually the Draftsman and Planning was very important to perhaps expedite the work that was not done on tonight's Agenda. Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated he had talked with Miss Midland this morning; that a situation had arisen in the Planning Department in Culver City, where she was presently employed part-time under the same salary arrangement, and she had asked for several weeks extension Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1965-U02 09-U02 15-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116848-U03 DO116926-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1965 09 15 CC MINHÄ—@¸—/Í«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council 2523 September 15, 1965 Page 15 before coming to Baldwin Park; that she was originally to report to work on September 20, 1965; that he had granted her this extension of time but if she did not appear at that time the City would have to recruit someone else. City Clerk Balkus read Resolution No. 65-147 by title as RES. NO. 65-147 follows: RESOLUTION NO. 65-147 AMEND. RES. NO. 65-9. RE EMPLOYEES' SALARIES FOR YR. 1965-66 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 65-93 RELATING TO EMPLOYEES' SALARIES FOR THE YEAR 1965-66" COUNCILMAN MCCARON MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 65-147 BE RES. NO. 65-147 APPROVED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILWOMAN ADOPTED' GREGORY SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN MCCARON, GREGORY, ADAIR, AND MAYOR CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD 00- City Engineer French reviewed his report regarding a SHORT FORM 1911 ACT Short Form 1911 Act on the south side of Pacific Avenue SOUTH SIDE OF PACIFIC between Ahern Drive and Vineland Avenue stating that AVENUE BETWEEN AHERN since the start of construction on Pacific Avenue there DR. AND VINELAND AVE. had been three property owners voluntarily put in curb and gutter In this block and therefore only one property was left without curb and gutter; that he recommended the initiation of this Short Form 1911 Act to complete this block. City Engineer French read Resolution No. 65-150 by title as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 65-150 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO CAUSE THE CONSTRUCTION OF CURBS AND GUTTERS PURSUANT TO THE PRO- VISIONS OF SECTION 5870 ET. SEQ. OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA" COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 65-150 BE APPROVED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN GREGORY, ADAIR, MCCARON AND MAYOR CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD Note: The public hearing date set forth in the resolution was October 20, 1965. 00- City Engineer French reviewed his report regarding the dedication of Dart Street in the vicinity of Robinette stating that this was.a new five 5) lot subdivision off of Dart; that there were two one foot access lots involved and one future street involved; that this would provide a dedicated street to and from the proposed sub- division; that the recommendation was that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 65-149 which was read by title as follows: Continued) RES. NO. 65-I50 DECLARING INTENT. TO CAUSE CONSTRUC- TION OF C AND G PURSUANT TO PRO- VISIONS OF SECTION 5870 ET. SEQ. OF STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE OF STATE OF CAL! RES. NO. 65-150 APPROVED P.H. DATE OCT. 20, 1965 REPORT BY CITY ENGR. RE DEDICATION OF DAR ST. IN VICINITY OF ROBINETTE RES. NO. 65-149 ACCEPT. OFFER OF Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1965-U02 09-U02 15-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116848-U03 DO116926-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1965 09 15 CC MINHÄ—@¸—/Í«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin-Park City Council. September 15, 1965 Page 16 RESOLUTION-NO. 65-149 DED. WITH REFERENCE TO TRACT NOS. 19295 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE AND 26450 CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ACCEPTING AN OFFER OF DEDICATION WITH REFERENCE TO TRACT NOS. 19295 AND 26450" COUNCILMAN ADAIR MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 65-149 BE RES. NO. 65-149 APPROVED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN ADOPTED MCCARON SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN ADAIR, MCCARON, GREGORY AND MAYOR CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD 00- City Engineer French reviewed his report regarding the REPORT BY CITY ENGR. approval of the budget for State Allocated 2107 Funds RE APPROVAL OF BUDGE stating that prior to July 1, 1965, the City had to adopt FOR STATE ALLOCATED a budget for first quarter payment of State.Highway Funds; 2107 FUNDS that the City knew the total but not the proportioning of the Funds so the City had adopted a budget to get the funds; that just recently the City had received the final proportion- ing of the funds and an approved budgeting of funds by the State; that in effect it moved approximately $2800.00 into the Baldwin Park Boulevard project and decreased the main- tenance budget by approximately $2800.00; that it was the recommendation that the City Council adopt Resolution No. RES. NO. 65-151 65-151 which was read by title as follows: ADOPT. BUDGET FOR EXP. OF FUNDS RESOLUTION NO. 65-151 ALLOCATED FROM STATE HIGHWAY FUND TO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF CITIES THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ADOPTING BUDGET FOR EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS ALLOCATED FROM THE STATE HIGHWAY FUND TO CITIES" COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 65-151 BE RES. NO. 65-151 APPROVED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN ADAIR ADOPTED SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN GREGORY, ADAIR, MCCARON AND MAYOR CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD 00- Planning Director Chivetta presented a resume of Tentative TENTATIVE TRACT NO_ Tract No. 23709 located on the easterly side of Walnut Street 23709 approximately eight hundred thirty 830) feet southerly of the centerline of East Olive Street between East Olive Street on the north and Los Angeles Street on the south, Lun-Dee Investment Company, Subdivider, John E. Gruben, Agent. He stated the Planning Commission had adopted PC 65-37 on September 7, 1965, recommending denial for the reason that the tentative tract was in variance with Section 11510 of the State Subdivision Map Act relative to the design of said tract. He stated that the appli- cant was agreeable to redesigning the map. He pointed out three maps on the wall: the top one being the one submitted to the Planning Commission; the second one showing Kenmore continuing in a southerly direction to front on Parcels 11 and 12; and the lower map was the applicant's map as redesigned creating thirteen 13) cuts of the land; that Parcel 13 was a flag lot which was not in accord with the lot split ordinance of the Zoning Code creating less than fifty 50) foot of frontage on a dedicated street. He pointed out on the wall an area map and on top of that a physical Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1965-U02 09-U02 15-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116848-U03 DO116926-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1965 09 15 CC MINHÄ—@¸—/Í«2 52$ I Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council September 15, 1965 I I Page,:17 layout of the structures existing. He stated that the Planning Commission was of the opinion that' the blue area that was shaded on the physical layout was the dedicated street and if Kenmore was continued in a southerly direction it could tie up with this blue area"; that the blue area was not a dedicated street; that it was a private street and homes would have to be acquired plus the'additional parcels to continue.the street through; that the street that the applicant wished to name Walnut Place the Planning Commission recommended that it be named Benwood so that it would line up with Benwood coming in from the east; that the staff was of the opinion that Kenmore could be continued in a southerly direction but the cul-de-sac could be pulled down and reinstalled as shown on the original map submitted by the applicant because this would create the best drainage for the tract. Councilwoman Gregory stated she would like an explanation between deadend and cul-de-sac for drainage problems. City Engineer French stated there was a multiple problem with the extension In a deadend way; that first of all there would be a half street crewed; that the future development would tie into Merced Street; that to get a fully improved street along Merced Street also required the taking of a structure and would greatly reduce the setbacks of existing homes in the area. He cidrified that he was referring to the little private street that went in. He stated the widening of the existing Kenmore coming down would create another problem, the taking of structures; that possibly a deeper cul-de-sac than the one proposed could be drained back to Benwood Street and then out to Walnut without a drainage structure and a great deal of filling taking place; that if the street was extended as proposed by Exhibit A the street could be broken so that over half of the street would drain'back to Benwood and out to Walnut with a minimum of filling but the southerly end of that street would have to be provided with some kind, of a temporary drainage easement or a structure that would carry the water on out to Walnut; that it did not s::.)m very likely that the street would go through because the Iructure in the way was not very old; that if there wab n, problem of developing the other way the street could, if something happened in the area and a wider street could be had south off of Merced, be developed on a cul-de-sac basis running north and there would be two cul-de-sacs that did not join; that this was not an area where a lot of traffic was trying to be moved. In answer to a question by Councilwoman Gregory, Planning Director Chivetta stated the lots on the cul-de-sac as proposed would be in excess of 10,000 square feet Parcel 11 and 12); that Exhibit A showed maximum lots on II and 12 and in excess of 5,000 square feet on Lots 1-10; that on the redesign as presented the lots were still in excess of 5,000 square feet and Parcel 13 had In excess of 8,000 square feet and had twenty-nine 29) foot of frontage on the half street which would be Kenmore at this point. Mayor Crites asked if Lots ll, 12 and 13 could be redesigned to get three acceptable lots coming out on the deadend street. Planning Director Chivetta stated no not unless there would be substandard lots in width. Place. Councilwoman Gregory asked why this street would be called Benwood when directly across the street there was Walnut Planning Director Chivetta stated in a study of the re- naming of streets Walnut Place was to be recommended to be changed to Benwood mainly because of the emergency situations where a person would call In an merely say he was on Walnut and not say Street or Place. Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1965-U02 09-U02 15-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116848-U03 DO116926-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1965 09 15 CC MINHÄ—@¸—/Í«2526 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council September 15, 1965 Page 18 In answer to a question by Councilwoman Gregory, City Engineer French stated the cul-de-sac could be drained with,a minimum amount of draining. Councilman McCaron stated this was a problem area in view of the prior development. City Engineer French stated the way the houses had been built in this area it was very difficult to provide access south of the subdivision in that the houses were put in based upon a thirty 30) foot wide easement and the houses were not developed to go to a full width street; that even a forty 40) foot dedicated street would require removal of some structures that someone is living In. Councilman McCaron stated regarding Exhibit A, if the drain- age could be provided for the end of the street, that that would at least hold the area open so that better development could be provided; that it would appear that providing for future extension would be better than killing it off with a cul-de-sac. City Engineer French stated it could be created; that it would cause some problem in the future in the extE.ision of the street; that the subdivider would have to get i easement on out to Walnut and carry it under.: JLi+iG or build up the whole subdivision adequateiy tc carry it to Walnut; that this would be a matter of economics with the subdivider. Councilman McCaron stated he wondered if it would be possible to develop the property as a cul-de-,..ac as shown in the original application and take thu add-i•. tional dedication for the future street; or a minimum cul-de-sac could be put in instead of a full cul-de-sac. City Engineer French stated yes and commented that Lot 12 would only have access off of the future street and out to the end of the cul-de-sac. Councilman McCaron asked if the street development was the only phase the Planning Commission objected to. Planning Director Chivette stated yes; that the only item was on design primarily based on the circulation. Mr. William Shultz, Surveyor, Hillcrest Engineering, WILLIAM SHULTZ, 30 Santa Clara Street, Arcadia, stated they would agree Surveyor, Hillcrest to any change the Council wished to make. Engineering, 30 Santa Clara St., Arcadia Discussion followed regarding going north to Bellbrook Street; that there weren't any structures in the way of this street providing for a full sixty 601 foot dedicated street all the way to Bellbrook; that this would not solve the problem south. Further discussion followed. AT 10:08 P.M. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT THE CITY RECESS AT 10:08 P.M. COUNCIL RECESS FOR FIVE MINUTES. COUNCILMAN ADAIR RECONVENE. AT 10:13 SECONDED. There were no objections, the motion carried P.M. and was so ordered by Mayor Crites. BIB] 39576-U01 1965-U02 09-U02 15-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116848-U03 DO116926-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1965 09 15 CC MINHÄ—@¸—/Í« 4..327 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council September 15, 1965 Page 19 AYES: COUNCILMEN MCCARON, GREGORY, ADAIR 1965 AND MAYOR CR I TES NOES: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD 00- 00- Councilman McCaron stated the applicant had been asked if he would ask for an extension of time on this until the next meeting and he was to straighten out the drainage on this tract. Mr. William Shultz indicated he was the Agent for the Subdivider and that it was his request that the matter be held over to October 6, 1965. COUNCILMAN MCCARON MOVED THAT TRACT NO. 23709 BE HELD OVER AT THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST TO OCTOBER 6, 1965. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD AND CITY TREASURER PUGH BE EXCUSED. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. There were no objections, the motion carried and was so ordered by Mayor Crites. City Clerk Backus read Resolution No. 65-148 by title as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 65-148 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ALLOWING CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK" COUNCILMAN ADAIR MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 65-148 BE APPROVED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: MOTION MADE AND CARRIED THAT TRACT NO. 23709 BE HELD OVER AT APPLICANT'S REQUEST TO OCT. 6, COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD AND CITY TREASURER PUGH EXCUSED RES. NO. 65-148 ALLOWING CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AGAINST CITY OF B.PK. GENERAL CLAIMS AND DEMANDS NOS. 315-368 INCL. PAYROLL CLAIMS AND DEMANDS NOS. 2001- 2106 INCL. RES. NO. 65-148 ADOPTED AYES: COUNCILMEN ADAIR, GREGORY, MCCARON AND MAYOR CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD i 00- Chief Administrative Officer Nordby recommended that the City Council adjourn to September 29, 1965; that there was another item besides the one mentioned earlier in the evening which the City Attorney might wish to discuss, probably in Executive Session, concerning possible litigation. DISC. RE ADJ. MTG. City Attorney Flandrick stated there was a problem on 64-A-I; that he would like to complete the memorandum and get it to the Council well in advance of the Adjourned Meeting. RE 64-A-I BIB] 39576-U01 1965-U02 09-U02 15-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116848-U03 DO116926-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1965 09 15 CC MINHÄ—@¸—/Í«2528 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council AT 10:26 P':M. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADJOURN TO WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 29, 1965, AT 7:30 P-.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER OF THE CITY HALL. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN GREGORY, ADAIR, MCCARON AND MAYOR CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD IVORY D.S, MAYOR September 15, 1965 Page 20 ADJ. AT 10:26 P.M. TO WED., SEPT. 29, 1965, AT 7:30 P.M. IN COUNCIL CHAMBER OF CITY HALL THELMA L. BALKUS, CITY CLERK APPROVED: October 6 1965. Date of Distribution to City Council October I 1965. Date of Distribution to Departments October 4 1965. BIB] 39576-U01 1965-U02 09-U02 15-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116848-U03 DO116926-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1965 09 15 CC MINHÄ—@¸—/Í«REGULAR MEETING OF THE BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 15, 1965 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER) Il4U3 East Pacific Avenue 7:30 F.M. The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park met in regular session at the above place at 7:30 p.m. Mayor Crites led the salute to the flac.. FLAG SALUTE Roll Call: Present: COUNCILMEN ADAIR, GREGORY, MCCARON AND MAYOR CRITES ROLL CALL Absent: COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD AND CITY TREASURER PUGH Also Present: CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER NORDBY, CITY ATTORNEY FLAN DRI CK CITY ENGINEER FRENCH, BUILDING SUPERINTENDENT KALBFLEISCH, PLANNING DIRECTOR CHIVETTA, FINANCE DIRECTOR DUNCAN, CHIEF OF POLICE ADAMS AND CITY CLERK BALKUS 00- AT 10:26 P.M. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT THE CITY ADJ. AT 10:26 P.M. COUNCIL ADJOURN TO WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 29, 1965, AT 7:30 P.M. TO WED., SEPT. 29, IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER OF THE CITY HALL. COUNCILMAN ADAIR 1965, AT 7:30 P.M. SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN GREGORY, ADAIR, MCCARON AND MAYOR CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEN MOREHEAD 00- THELMA L. BALKUS, CITY CLERK I DATED: September 16, 1965 TIME o A.M. BIB] 39576-U01 1965-U02 09-U02 15-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116848-U03 DO116926-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1965 09 15 CC MINHÄ—@¸—/Í«STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) SS: AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK OF AMMENT 5P MEETING THELMA L. BALKUS, being first duly sworn, says and deposes: that I the duly chosen, qualified and acting City Clerk of the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park; that at a_, regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park held SeptemberIS 1965, said meeting was ordered adjourned to the time and place specified in the Notice of the Adjournment ATTACHED HERETO; that on September 16 I%, at the hour of 9:20 a.m. I posted a copy of said Notice at a conspicuous place on or near the door of the place at which said meeting of September 15 was held. Thelma L. alkus, City Clerk Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 19~. sa i ld County and State JACKQUELEAN ROADY My Commission Expires Feb. 24, 1968 BIB] 39576-U01 1965-U02 09-U02 15-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116848-U03 DO116926-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 Í«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council accomplished; that to his K6owl edge when, he l eft Mr French's, office the last time everything had been accomplished with the exception of the posting of a bond;, that Mr. Ciesiolk,i;ewicz was in agreement and would post the bond. City Engineer French stated the dedication had been, made to make provisions for a sixty 60) foot street;.that the applicant had divided the property In accordance with the Zoning Code to have the proper lot split; that the map had been filed and checked, but before final approval could be given to the lot split the guarantee of the Improvements was required; that this was the only condition that was keeping the lot split from having approval. Mr. Stearns stated this guarantee could be and would be effected but Mr. Ciesiolkiewicz was hesitsnt about putting any more monies out if a denial of the relocation was going to be reaffirmed. He stated that Mr. Ciesiolkiewicz had purchased the lot and paid for all of the fees and tried to comply with all of the requirements of the various departments. He stated that the items in question that apparently contributed to the denial were not apropos; that with regard to Section 2a, there were two structures,. one approximately 740 square feet in living area and. the second a detached combined single car garage and utility room which were proposed, as the drawing indicated, to be combined with the main structure into one complete home that would be in excess of 1380 square feet; that certainly this was not a substandard structure; that Building Super- intendent Kalbfleisch had indicated, in his estimation, there would be requisite provisions required; that the applicant had agreed to comply with these provisions; that he was willing to put up the required bond in the amount of $3400.00 with the understanding that it would not cost $3400.00 but a bond requirement was always made of approximately 14 to 11 times the amount of the cost; that with regard to Section 2b the house as evidenced by the Certificate of Occupancy in Arcadia was given in April of 1950 which would make the house fifteen 15) plus years; that with regard to Section 2c the structures on either side of the location where the house was to be relocated were twenty-five 25) to thirty 30) years old; that this structure would exceed in beauty, utility and in value the structures already existing; that he had discussed Section 2d with Planning Director Chivetta; that the only criticism the Planning Director had voiced was that the Planning Commission had not approved any structures, prior to this time, that were in excess of ten IC) years of age; that in view of what was proposed and what Mr. Ciesiolkiewicz would be bound to do he wondered if that criticism was appropriate; that in any event they were not asking for a permit to reconstruct something that would be detrimental to Baldwin Park; that Mr. Ciesiolkiewicz purchased these structures from the State Highway Department; that Mr. Ciesiolkiewicz had a large family and was going to live in the sturcture; that he was not building this or proposing to build this for speculation; that the representatives of the State Highway Department told him that these structures were approximately five 5) years of age; that the structures had been lifted onto blocks in preparation for moving; that he had paid and entered Into a contract with a moving con- tractor; that he had purchased and entered into the purchase for this lot; that he had done everything possible in order to create a home for himself and his family; that he thought if the Council could look at this appeal or request with the intent and feeling that he had expressed that the construction would be advantageous to the City. September 15, 1965 Page 12 In answer to a question by Mayor Crites, City Attorney Flandrick stated the property had yet.to be divided so at the present time the approval of the relocation permit. would, in effect, violate the Zoning Ordinance. He suggested that if the Council Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1965-U02 09-U02 15-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116848-U03 DO116926-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06