Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1966 02 02 CC MIN1966 02 02 CC MINHÄ—@¸—0Š Í«2 *734 REGULAR MEETING OF THE BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 2, 1966 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER) lL1LO3 East Pacific Avenue 7:30 P.M. In accordance with Section 2703 of the Municipal Code the City Council met in open meeting at 7:00 p.m. in the Conference Room for an informal session with the staff to be informed on regular agenda items. The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park met in regular session at the above place at 7:30 p.m. Councilman Morehead led the salute to the flag. FLAG SALUTE Roll Call: Present: COUNCILMEN ADAIR, GREGORY, ROLL CALL MCCARON, MOREHEAD AND MAYOR CRI TE S Absent: NONE Also Present: CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER NORDBY, CITY ATTORNEY FLANDRICK, CITY ENGINEER FRENCH, BUILDING SUPERINTENDENT KALBFLEISCH, PLANNING DIRECTOR CHIVETTA, FINANCE DIRECTOR DUNCAN, CHIEF OF POLICE ADAMS, CITY TREASURER PUGH AND CITY CLERK BALKUS 00- CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARINGS CONTINUATION OF P.H. 1. N-10 To determine whether certain premises, and buildings and structures constitute public N-10 nuisances Address: 4641 Merced Avenue As there were no objections, Mayor Crites stated that the public hearing on N-10 would be continued to the next regular meeting and in the interim request the City Clerk to advise Areo Homes and the Excrow holder of the circumstances namely that the hearing will be continued to CONTINUED TO February 16, 1966, with the assumption that this FEBRUARY 16, 1966 property would be boarded up and taken care of for proper inspection Monday, February 7, 1966). 2. N-12 To determine whether certain premises, and N-12 buildings and structures constitute public nuisances Address: 1327 Virginia Avenue As there were no objections, Mayor Crites stated that the public hearing on N-12 would be continued to the next regular meeting on the recommendation CONTINUED TO of the City Attorney providing that whoever the FEBRUARY 16, 1966 attorney was that Mr. William Ramos contacts that he be advised that a letter is to be directed to the City Council and in the hands of the City Clerk prior to that meeting indicating that Mr. Ramos had retained him and the purpose for the reten- tion in terms of eliminating the problem so that some disposition could be made of this case. Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO116941-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 02 02 CC MINHÄ—@¸—0Š Í«V BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO116941-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 02 02 CC MINHÄ—@¸—0Š Í«35 I I Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council February 2, 1966 Page 2 AT 12:10 A.M. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADJOURN. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY SECONDED. There were no objections, the motion carried and was so ordered by Mayor Crites. By DATED: February 3, 1966 TIME: 10: 00 A.M. 00- ADJ. AT 12:10 A.M. /s/ Thelma L. Balkus THELMA L. BALKUS, CITY CLERK Venessa C. Langseei, Deputy C i t y Cler BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO116941-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 02 02 CC MINHÄ—@¸—0Š Í«b BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO116941-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 02 02 CC MINHÄ—@¸—0Š Í«3t, I REGULAR MEETING OF THE BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER) 14403 East Pacific Avenue in accordance with Section 2703 of the Municipal Code the City Council met in open meeting at 7:00 p.m. in the Conference Room for an informal session with the staff to be informed on regular agenda items. The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park met in regular session at the above place at 7:30 p.m. Councilman Morehead led the salute to the flag. Roll Call: Present: COUNCILMEN ADAIR, GREGORY, MCCARON, MOREHEAD AND MAYOR CRITES Absent: NONE Also Present: CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER NOROBY, CITY ATTORNEY FLANDRICK, CITY ENGINEER FRENCH, BUILDING SUPERINTENDENT KALBFLEISCH, PLANNING DIRECTOR CHIVETTA, FINANCE DIRECTOR DUNCAN, CHIEF OF POLICE ADAMS, CITY TREASURER PUGH AND CITY CLERK BALKUS 00- Councilwoman Gregory stated that the motion on the bottom of Page 8 of the January 5, 1966, mtnutes should read COUNCILMAN N,CRE HEAD SECONDED.". COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT THE MINUTES OF JANUARY 5, 1966, BE APPROVED AS AMENDED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD SECONDED. There were no objections, the motion carried and was so ordered by Mayor Crites. FEBRUARY 2, 1966 7:30 P.M. FLAG SALUTE ROLL CALL CORRECTION TO PAGE 8 OF JAN. 5, 1966. MINUTES MINUTES OF'JAN. 5, 1966 APPROVED AS AMENDED 00- Mayor Crites stated that representatives of three tribes WOODCRAFT RANGERS of the Woodcraft Rangers were in the audience in ecmmemoration IN AUDIENCE of their Good Citizenship Week of February 12-26, 1966; that he had been appointed 44oncrery Chief of their group; that pictures tied been taken prior to the meeting. He read a proclamatfor declaring February 12-26, 1966, as Woodcraft Rangers Good Citizenship Week. PROCLAMATION DECLAF2- ING FEB. 12-26, 1966 AS WOOD CRAFT RANGERS GOOD CITIZENSHIP WELK 00- Mr. Vito Bellino, listed under Oral Communications, was not VITO BELLINO in the audience at this time. NOT IN AUDIENCE AT THIS TIME 00- City Clerk Balkus stated that Mr. Gus Nesseth had requested GUS NESSETH to speak. TO SPEAK LATER Mr. Gus Nesseth stated he wished to speak on an Agenda item later in the meeting. 00- City Clerk Balkus read a letter from Darcy A. Skaggs, LETTER FROM DARCY Superintendent of Schools, Baldwin Park Unified School A. SKAGGS, SUPT. OF District dated January 21, 1966 regarding the proposed SCHOOLS, B.PK. UINI- oval track to be constructed just west of the Baldwin FIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Park boundary lines close to Olive Street if extended. DATED JAN. 21, 1966, PROPOSED OVAL TRACK IN IRWINDALE Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO116941-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 02 02 CC MINHÄ—@¸—0Š Í« Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council As there were no objections, Mayor Crites directed that the letter be received and filed. 00- City Attorney Flandrick stated the City of Irwindale had set the appeal hearing regarding the oval track applied for by Mr. Tice through Soland Corporation for February 15, 1966. 00- City Clerk Balkus presented a claim against the City submitted by Lucille A. Walsh. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT THE CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY BY LUCILLE A. WALSH BE DENIED AND REFERRED TO THE INSURANCE CARRIER AND N. A. ARTUKOVICH, CONTRACTOR. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN GREGORY, ADAIR, MCCARON, MOREHEAD AND MAYOR CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE 00- City Clerk Balkus presented a claim against the City submitted by Douglas A. Hilton. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT THE CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY BY DOUGLAS A. HILTON BE DENIED AND REFERRED TO THE INSURANCE CARRIER AND TO N.A. ARTUKOVICH, CONTRACTOR. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN GREGORY, MOREHEAD, ADAIR, MCCARON AND MAYOR CRITES NOES;, NONE ABSENT: NONE 00- Chief Administrative Officer Nordby recommended approval of Resolution No. 66-30 setting a public hearing date of March 2, 1966, for N-18 through N-26 inclusive. Resolution No. 66-30 was read by title as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 66-30 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A HEARING TO DETER- MINE WHETHER CERTAIN BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES CONSTITUTE PUBLIC NUISANCES N-18 THROUGH N-26)" COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 66-30 BE APPROVED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN MOREHEAD, ADAIR, GREGORY, MCCARON AND MAYOR-CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE February 2, 1966 Page 2 RECEIVED AND FILED APPEAL HEARING RE OVAL TRACK SET"FOR FEB. 15, 1966 BEFORE IRWINDALE CITY COUNCIL CLAIM AGAINST CITY LUCILLE A. WALSH DENIED AND REFERRED TO INS. CARRIER AND N.A. ARTUKOVICH, CONTRACTOR CLAIM AGAINST CITY DQUGLAS.A. HILTON DENIED AND REFERRED TO INS. CARRIER AND N.A. ARTUKOVICH, CONTRACTOR N-18 THROUGH N-26 INCL. P.H. DATE MARCH 2, 1966 RES. NO.~66 30 SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A HEARING TO DETERMINE WHETHER CERTAIN BLDGS. AND STRUCTURES CONSTITUTr PUBLIC NUISANCES N-18 THROUGH N-26) RES. NO. 66-30 ADOPTED 00- BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO116941-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 02 02 CC MINHÄ—@¸—0Š Í« 27139a_ I Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council Chief Administrative Officer Nordby reviewed his report on the Recreation Agreement between City, School District and the County of Los Angeles stating that the Council on June 16, 1965, agreed to participate in supporting a recreation program, the general terms being for the School District to contribute cash in the amount of $12,500.00, the Park and Recreation District to supply the supervision of the program and the City to provide $1800.00 cash plus assuming the accounting and payroll responsibilities; that this agreement would be effective March 1, 1966. As there were no objections, Mayor Crites stated this matter would be held over to the next regular meeting to give the Council an opportunity to review the agree- ment. 00- Chief Administrative Officer Nordby reviewed his report on the refund of a Business License Deposit stating that the applicant never engaged in any business; that the gentlemen had been closed down because of the lack of a conditional use permit; that it was a misunderstanding between the tenant and the landlord; that he recommended that the City Council refund the Business License Deposit of $108.00 less a ten percent 10%) overhead charge of $10.80 making the actual refund $97.20. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT THE SUM OF $97.20 BE REFUNDED TO MR. WILLIAM E. GREENAN $108.00 LESS $10.80). COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN MOREHEAD, GREGORY, ADAIR, MCCARON AND MAYOR CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE 00- Chief Administrative Officer Nordby reviewed his report on Contractual Payroll Services stating that the Finance Director had prepared a detailed report on the savirgs to the City; that the Finance Director stated it would make it necessary to add to the stafc next year and provide for additional services. He stated ih5t 5arnking institutions had provided this kind of servi:e rcr many years; that the City of Covina had an agreement with a banking institution for payroll preparation and they felt it was a time saving and money saving device. Finance Director Duncan stated this matter had been studied for approximately two 2) mont:ic; that cities, some smaller and some larger t'nan Baldwin Park, were now contracting for this service; that the cost would be approximately $120.00 per month; that now in the Finance Department, personnel was recruited in the Account Clerk category; that with this service a very small portion of reporting would be done by the Finance Department and the Finance Department could possibly use a Clerk Typist at a reduced rate of pay per month; that there were many facets including Gas Tax Reporting pro- jects to be utilized from this service; that this was just scratching the surface utilizing the computers. Councilwoman Gregory stated she had contacted four cities with population greater than Baldwin Park and they were not using this system. She asked if the NCR Machine would still be used. Continued) February 2, 1966 Page 3 RECREATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY, SCHOOL DISTRICT AND COUNTY OF L.A. HELD OVER TO NEXT REG. MTG. REPORT BY C.A.O. RE REFUND OF BUSINESS LICENSE DEPOSIT MOTION MADE AND CARRIED THAT SUM OF $97.20 BE RE- FUNDED TO MR. WM. E. CREENAN $108.00 LESS $10.80.). REPORT BY C.A.O. ON CONTRACTUAL PAY- ROLL SERVICES BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO116941-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 02 02 CC MINHÄ—@¸—0Š Í«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council Finance Director Duncan stated the machines the banks used for this service were computers; that the NCR Machine was just an Accounting Machine; that.the NCR Machine would be utilized for the accounts payable and all of the general ledger. Councilwoman Gregory asked if this would be a yearly contract. Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated he would suggest that it be a continuing contract possibly with a cancellation clause; that he could recommend this service without hesita- tion; that payroll was generally the first step to put on a computer; that it would only require City preparation of the payroll sheets and changes in personnel; that the staff recommended that the Bank of America be contracted with for this service. City Attorney Flandrick stated the agreement as proposed by the Bank of America was their standard form service agreement; that it provided fer a thirty 30) day cancellation clause by the City and a sixty 160) day cancellation clause by the Bank.. COUNCILMAN MCCARON MOVED T&AT THE CITY COUNCIL ENTER AN AGREEMENT WITH THE BANK FOR THIS.SERVICE CONTRACTUAL PAYROLL SERVICES). COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN MCCARON, ADAIR, GREGORY, MOREHEAD AND.MAYOR CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated he recommended the adoption of proposed Resolution No. 66-35 commending Supervisor Frank Bonelli. Ctty Clerk Balkus read Resolution No. 66-35 by title as fol lows: RESOLUTION NO. 66-35 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK COMMENDING SUPERVISOR FRANK G. BONELLI FOR HIS CONTRIBUTION TO THE STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS IN CALIFORNIA" COUNCILMAN MCCARON MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 66-35 BE APPROVED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN MCCARON, MOREHEAD, ADAIR, GREGORY AND MAYOR CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE 00- For the benefit of the Woodcraft Rangers who were not in the audience at the beginning of the meeting, Mayor Crites read the proclamation declaring February 12-26, 1966, as Woodcraft Rangers Good Citizenship Week and asked the Woodcraft Rangers present to stand. February 2, 1966 Page 4 MOTION MADE AND CARRIED THAT COUNCIL ENTER AGREEMENT WITH BANK FOR THIS SERVICE CONTRACTUAL PAYROLL SERVICES) RES. NO. 66-35 COMMENDING SUPER- VISOR FRANK G. BONELLI FOR HIS CONTRIBUTION TO STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS IN CALIFORNIA RES. NO. 66-35 ADOPTED WOODCRAFT RANGERS BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO116941-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 02 02 CC MINHÄ—@¸—0Š Í«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council City Clerk Balkus administered the oath to those in the audience desiring to be heard during the meeting. 00- City Attorney Flandrick stated that Special Enforcement Officer Palmer had made his investigation again today of the various properties and has advised that N-9 and N-II had, to his satisfaction, been cleaned up and structures and so forth demolished; that there were pictures as well as a staff report indicating this to be the situation; that it would at this time be appropriate to dismiss the proceedings as to Agenda Items 3 and 5. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT ITEMS N-9 AND N-II BE DISMISSED FOR THE REASONS STATED. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN GREGORY, ADAIR, MCCARON, MOREHEAD AND MAYOR CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE 00- City Attorney Flandrick announced that the hour of 8:00 p.m. having arrived that it was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on N-7, to determine whether certain premises, buildings and structures constitute a public nuisance at 13135 Fairgrove Street. City Attorney Flandrick stated that proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. He passed to the Council Exhibit A) pictures of the property at 13135 Fairgrove Street, stating the only alteration that had occurred since the taking of the pictures was that the boards on the doors and windows had been removed and it was now open to the public; that the Council had a staff report from tho Specia( Enforcement Officer, including reports from the Building, Engineering, Health and Fire Departments; that the lot was R-I zoned, approximately fifty-eight 158) feet by one hundred seventy one 171) feet in depth; that the staff recommendation was that N-7 be abated as a public nuisance. As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak in behalf of or in opposition to N-7, Mayor Crites declared the public hearing closed. Resolution No. 66-24 was read by title as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 66-24 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK FINDING AND DETERMINING THE EXISTENCE OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING THE SAME ABATED CASE NO. N-7, 13135 FAIRGROVE STREET)" COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 66-24 BE APPROVED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN MOREHEAD, GREGORY, ADAIR, MCCARON AND MAYOR CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE February 2, 1966 Page 5 OATH ADMINISTERED N-9 AND N-11 ABATED N-9 AND N-II DIS- MISSED PUBLIC HEARING N-7 13135 Fairgrove St. POSTING, MAILINGS PICTURES PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED N-7 RES. NO. 66-24 FINDING AND DETER- MINING THE EXISTENCE OF A,PUBL.IC NUISANCE AND ORDER i NG THE SAME ABATED CASE NO. N-7, 1313 5 FA IRGROVE ST. RES. NO. 66-24 ADOPTED 00- BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO116941-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 02 02 CC MINHÄ—@¸—0Š Í«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council City Attorney Flandrick announced that it was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on N-8, to determine whether certain premises, buildings and structures con- stitute a public nuisance at 4236 Center Street. City Attorney Flandrick stated that proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. City Attorney Flandrick stated that N-8 was a parcel of property having several structures on it. He passed to the Council Exhibit A) photographs of the property. He stated the Council had a staff report from Special' Enforcement Officer Palmer including Building, Engineering, Fire and Health Departments recommendations and comments; that the property was zoned R-l; that it was sixty-four 64) feet by three hundred five 305) feet in depth; that there was one structure on the property which was presently occupied and the staff did not recommend the removal of this building; that the staff recommendation was that the re- mainder of the property be abated as a public nuisance. Councilman McCaron asked if the foundations would be removed. City Attorney Flandrick stated that this would be included in the abatement proceedings. As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak in behalf of or in opposition to N-8, Mayor Crites declared the public hearing closed. Resolution No. 66-25 was read by title as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 66-25 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK FINDING AND DETERMINING THE EXISTENCE OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING THE SAME ABATED CASE NO. N-8, 4236 CENTER STREET)" COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 66-25 BE APPROVED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN GREGORY, MOREHEAD, ADAIR, MCCARON AND MAYOR CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE 00- City Attorney Flandrick announced that it was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on N-10, to deter- mine whether certain premises, buildings and structures constitute a public nuisance at 4641 Merced Avenue. City Attorney Flandrick stated that proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. City Attorney Flandrick stated that the lot was zoned R-I; that it was approximately seventy-two 72) feet by three hundred ten 310) feet. He passed photographs of the property marked Exhibit A and stated the Council had a staff report from the Special Enforcement Officer includ- ing reports from the Building, Engineering, Fire and Health Departments; that the staff recommendation was that the Council find N-10 to be a public nuisance and order the same abated. TESTIMONY IN BEHALF OF THE NUISANCE ABATEMENT WAS CALLED FOR BY MAYOR CRITES. February 2, 1966 Page 6 PUBLIC HEARING N-8 4236 Center St. POSTINGS, MAILINGS PICTURES ONE STRUCTURE PRESENTLY OCCUPIED NOT TO BE REMOVED PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED N-8 RES. NO. 66-25 FINDING AND DETER- MINING THE EXISTENCE OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING THE SAME ABATED CASE NO. N-8, 4236 CENTER ST.) RES. NO. 66-25 ADOPTED PUBLIC HEARING N-10 4641 Merced Ave. POSTINGS, MAILINGS PICTURES TESTIMONY IN BEHALF Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO116941-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 02 02 CC MINHÄ—@¸—0Š Í«2742 I I Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council Mr. Merritt Cox, 3716 East Green, Pasadena, stated he was the present owner of the property; he asked for an exten- sion as the property had been in escrow for ten 10) months. Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated it might be appropriate to provide in the resolution of abatement a sixty 60) day period to give the owner or the purchaser adequate time to abate the nuisance. In answer to questions by Councilman Morehead, Mr. Cox stated that when the property was sold it was to be cleaned off for building and divided; that the delay in escrow was apparently finances of the builder; that the structure had been rented but it had been vacant approxi- mately five 5) months now. Special Enforcement Officer Palmer stated that the windows and doors of the dwelling should be boarded up because of Police and prowler problems. City Attorney Flandrick asked if the new owner had been advised of these proceedings. Mr. Cox stated not by himself. City Attorney Flandrick suggested before the Council acted on this that this hearing be continued to the next regular meeting and advise the prospective purchaser of the situa- tion; that If the Council took action to abate this, the cost of the abatement would go on to the'tax bill for next year. He further stated under the circumstances it might be wise to ask Mr. Cox to board up, in accordance with Mr. Palmer's request, the windows and doors. Mr. Cox stated that the prospective purchaser was Areo Construction on Ramona Boulevard and the escrow company was Fidelity Escrow on North Maine; that he would beard up the windows and doors on the weekend February 5-6, 1966) for inspection February 7, 1966. Discussion followed. As there were no objections, Mayor Crites stated that the public hearing on N-910 would be continued to the next regular meeting and in the interim request the City Clerk to advise Areo Homes and the Escrow holder of the circumstances namely that the hearing will be continued to February 16, 1966, with the assumption that this property would be boarded up and taken care of for proper inspection Monday, February 7, 1966). 00- City Attorney Flandrick announced that it was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on N-12, to determine whether certain premises, buildings and structures con- stitute a public nuisance at 1327 Virginia Avenue. City Attorney Flandrick stated that proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. City Attorney Flandrick stated the lot was zoned M-I; that it was approximately sixty-eight 68) feet in width and four hundred thirty-seven 4371 feet in depth. He presented five photographs of the property marked Exhibit A and stated the Council had a staff report prepared by the Special Enforcement Officer with comments from the Building, Engineering, Fire and Health Departments; that Continued) February 2; 1966 Page 7 MERRITT COX, OWNER, 3716 E. Green, Pasadena N-10 P.H. CONTINUED TO FEB. 16, 1966 IN INTERIM CITY CLERK TO ADVISE AREO HOMES AND ESCROW HOLDER OF CIRCUMSTANCES PROPERTY TO BE BOARD[ UP AND TAKEN CARE OF FOR PROPER INSPEC- TION MONDAY, FEB. 7, 1966) PUBLIC HEARING N-I2 1327 Virginia Ave. POSTINGS, MAILINGS PICTURES BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO116941-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 02 02 CC MINHÄ—@¸—0Š 1966 02 02 CC MINHÄ—@¸—0Š Í«2'7 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council February 2, 1966 Page 9 Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated there was much more to this particular situation than structural defects; that the big problem was the junk on the premises. Mr. David Ramos indicated he would seek the assistance of an attorney. As there were no objections, Mayor Crites stated'that the public hearing on N-12 would be continued to the next N-12 P.H. CONTINUEC TO FEB. 16, 1966 regular meeting providing that whoever the attorney was that Mr. William Ramos contacts that he be advised that a RAMOS' ATTY. TO letter is to be directed to the City Council and in the DIRECT LETTER TO hands of the City Clerk prior to that meeting indicating CITY COUNCIL AND that Mr. Ramos had retained him and the purpose for the HAVE IN HANDS OF retention in terms of eliminating the problem so that some CITY CLERK PRIOR disposition could be made of this case. TO NEXT MEETING INDICATING MR. RAMOS HAD RETAINED HIM AND PURPOSE FOR RETENTION IN TERMS OF ELIMINAT- ING THE PROBLEM 00- Mr. Vito Bellino, 3529 Big Dalton, Baldwin Park, stated VITO BELLINO, he had approached the America Legion for a teenage dance; 3529 Big Dalton, that the Baldwin Park ordinance was out of date as related B.Pk. to juvenile conditions in Baldwin Park; that he wanted to have a close coordinated strict dance through membership RE COOPERATIVE of teenagers 350 or 175 couples) on a fifty-fifty basis; 150-50) TEENAGE that there was nothing like this in town; that the Baldwin DANCE Park High School teenagers had no place to go; that he had suggested to Lieutenant Harte that anyone who lived in Baldwin Park over three years should have jurisdiction with the Police Department to run a fifty-fifty or cooperative dance, which after expenses one-half would go to juvenile recreation or benefit and the other one-half would go to the person who runs the dance; that he wanted to run a dance for Valentine's Day; that there should be a new ord- inance or system to raise money) for the juveniles. Mr. Bellino stated also that he had received a notice RE TENT. PARCEL MAP concerning Tentative Parcel Map No. 699; that the NO. 699 houses were almost built. City Attorney Flandrick stated the houses were being built on an existing tract; that this particular application was to straighten out lot lines in that tract. In answer to a question by Councilwoman Gregory, Mr. Bellino stated he had contacted the School District; that he had been told it was out of the jurisdiction of the School District to put any notice in the school regarding any project; that there was no team work between the Council and the Schools. Councilman McCaron stated he would suggest that if Mr. Bellino wanted to pursue this further that he contact some responsible organization in town and come up with a definite program. Mr. Bellino stated a gentleman from the American Legion, STATED WOULD WORK the Commander or the Vice Commander was for this program; UP A PROGRAM AND that he would get a program drawn up for presentation at BRING IT TO THE the next meeting. NEXT MTG. 00- City Engineer French reviewed his report on the Architectural REPORT BY CITY ENGR. Services for the Civic Auditorium stating that minor altera- RE ARCHITECTURAL tions could be undertaken at a reasonable cost without a SERVICES FOR CIVIC specific plan but it was definitely better to obtain a plan AUDITORIUM Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO116941-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 02 02 CC MINHÄ—@¸—0Š Í«2'M5 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council February 2, 1966 Page IO for the complete remodeling which could be used to guide the work so that it fits an overall plan of development; that he had contacted Strecker Associates, Inc. in anticipation of receiving a proposal for plans of a complete remodeling of the Civic Auditorium in regard to the follow- ing its: 1. Revisions to all exterior elevations 2. Revisions to West entry gate 3. Installation of a ticket-booth box office. 4. Installation of dressing rooms to the East building elevation for both men and women, which will include a water closet and lavatory, and storage for each dressing room. He stated the fee for the proposal would not exceed $2,650.00; that this could be taken out of the Engineering Department's budget; that he recommended that the City Council authorize this service and instruct the City Attorney to prepare an agreement in accordance with the proposal; that the ultimate expenditure for remodeling would be $30,000.00 to $50,000.00. Councilwoman Gregory stated she knew there was a Civic Center plan on the Planning Commission's priority list; that their recommendation might be for the new facility to be here or elsewhere and therefore she felt that this alteration plan was too broad in scope and premature at this time; that she would rather see the $2600.00 used for the more immediate things in the City such as curbs, gutters, sidewalks, resurfacing of the streets and the Lighting District which were more conducive to the welfare and safety of the citizens; that she would go along with the inside, the dressing rooms and the restrooms; that culture would have,.to take, in her opinion, a little longer wait. Councilman Morehead stated he agreed along some of the same lines Mrs. Gregory had just mentioned although he realized about the only change that had been made since construction was curtains and lightings and things such as that; that the general outside and inside physical conditions had not been changed except inside with paint and outside with trees. He asked what was the future potential need for this Auditorium that would warrant this reconstruction. Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated he had been approached by quite a number of groups, some who would be willing to manage the Auditorium; that he had with- drawn from this because he thought the City should main- tain control; that the Edgewood Players and the Music Theatre Guild had put on productions in the Auditorium; that the Edgewood Players had purchased a building on Azusa in Glendora; that the Music Theatre Guild was about to with- draw because of the dressing room situation; that he felt the community was culturally starving; that Baldwin Park had the only Auditorium in the area; that to replace this building, basing it on a square foot cost of current con- struction, it might run into one-half million dollars or more; that it disturbed him to know that the building was begun approximately thirty 130) years ago and had not been quite completed; that the contract proposed would give the City an orderly design and the City could proceed when they could afford to; that the staff had gone as far as they could with donated time and donated materials; that any other alterations were of a major proportion. Councilman Morehead stated he also agreed with Mr. Nordby in his thinking and future planning, however if the plans were not put into some use in two to four years the plans would become obsolete and the City would then have to have them altered and spend another $400.00 to $500.00; that he wished he could be part of approving of this entire Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO116941-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 02 02 CC MINHÄ—@¸—0Š Í«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin, Park City Council February 2, 1966 Page I 1 venture; that he wished the City had the money that was not needed elsewhere; that he had no evidence that the use of the Auditorium in the next few years would warrant such an expenditure. Councilwoman Gregory stated that San Gabriel had a very large and beautiful Playhouse which was seldom used; that there was nothing wrong with it and it seats several hundred people; that she did think the back stage of the Civic Auditorium needed remodeling; that she thought some- thing should bedot with these facilities on a small,scale; that she would like to go through the proper processing through the Planning Commission because it was on their priority list; that it did go along with the Civic Center facility that was being planned by the Planning Commission; that, in her opinion, the Council could, make some appropria- tions for the remodeling of the particular trouble spots at this time. Councilman McCaron stated this seemed to be an opportune time to start a study of the need for rehabilitation of the Civic Center; that some report should be had on the feasibility of having plans drawn for the entire complex and the money available for such an undertaking at the present time; that if this was entered into It would take some time to receive, and possibly some of the urgent addi- tions to the dressing rooms could be done by the City Engineer and staff, in other words have temporary dressing rooms to take care of the situation that exists; that any permanent improvements should be taken in course; that there was quite an investment in that area and he thought it should be preserved. Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated in the coming month or two the public schools here in Baldwin Park were putting on a number of musical productions and concerts in the Auditorium; that this was the first time in years that they had found this facility suitable; that there was no need for dressing rooms in these productions, however; that he knew that the San Gabriel Auditorium could not be made self sustaining; that he did not think it could be expected here either for a long, long time; that he thought this was one contribution that City Government could make to its citizens by supporting functions and encouraging functions in a facility of this kind; that insofar as the Auditorium plans were concerned information had been assembled but it had to be put down on paper; that the City was understaffed in Planning; that he had been trying to do some of the Planning himself; that whether the Civic Center was on this site or another site, in his opinion, the Civic Auditorium was here to stay for many many years. Councilwoman Gregory stated she disagreed with Councilman McCaron; that she did not think that anything should be temporary; that she felt there should be adequate dressing rooms and restrooms in the stage area; that she would also go along with the box office but she did not feel at this time any other remodeling should be done. Mayor Crites stated this was a substantial structure and had possibilities of use; that even when the Planning Commission finished with the plans they would still require the services of an architect; that all this was was a• plan from which the City could work to provide permanent facilities in conjunction with what the City already had; that whether the Civic Center was maintained on this particular premises or on another property in the City the Auditorium could still be a valuable consideration even apart from the central governmental complex. Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO116941-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 02 02 CC MINHÄ—@¸—0Š Í«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council Councilwoman Gregory asked if there would be a need for Strecker Associates, Inc. to do this work that the Council had been talking about for the restrooms, dressing rooms and box office. City Engineer French stated that the revisions to the exterior elevations and to the west entry gate were not meant to be actually revised; that it was intended to obtain plans to make the building look better, such as a finish or a type of a paint or a color scheme; that it was not intended to have structural revisions; that for the installa- tion of the ticket booth and the men and women's dressing rooms it was strictly a matter of manpower; that Strecker Associates, Inc. had designed public facilities and were qualified to design and lay out dressing rooms; that it was felt this service was needed; that basically he did not want to do anything more to the building without a plan; that money had been spent trying to solve individual problems; that it was recommended that the firm be hired for the design of the restrooms, dressing rooms and the ticket booth. Councilwoman Gregory asked if there were plans ever made for the back stage facility. City Clerk Balkus stated it seemed to her that in 1958 there were old plans and some additions were made to these plans; that at one, time these were in the Engineering De- partment. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT STRECKER ASSOCIATES, INC. BE ASKED TO MAKE THIS STUDY; THAT THE PREPARATION OF AGREE- MENT BE DIRECTED AND BROUGHT BACK TO THE COUNCIL FOR REVIEW; THAT THIS WOULD BE INCLUDING THE DRESSING ROOMS, RESTROOMS AND THE BOX OFFICE AND NO REVISIONS TO THE EXTERIOR STRUCTURE AT THIS TIME. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD SECONDED. The motion carried by the foiloWing vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN GREGORY, MOREHEAD, ADAIR, MCCARON AND MAYOR CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE City Attorney Flandrick stated the proposed agreement would be submitted to the Council for their examination at the next regular meeting. Councilman McCaron stated, in his opinion, some study should still be made for an overall complex and some report made on it. Mayor Crites stated, in his opinion, the Planning Commission had been asked to sketch out something for a major plan and go from there; that he did not think the planning for this should come from some isolated member of the community. He stated he would urge them to give a little more time to consideration; that he realized their work load was extremely heavy at this time. 00- City Engineer French reviewed his report on the cost involved to complete the installation of curb and gutter at 14564 Pacific Avenue and recommended that Resolution No. 66-32 be adopted setting a hearing date of March 2, 1966, to hear any protests in regard to the cost. February 2, 1966 Page 12 MOTION MADE AND CARRIED THAT STRECKER ASSOCIATES, INC. BE ASKED TO MAKE THIS STUDY; THAT THE PREPARATION OF AGREE- MENT BE DIRECTED AND BROUGHT BACK TO COUNCIL FOR REVIEW; THAT THIS WOULD BE INCLUDING THE DRESS- ING ROOMS, RESTROOMS AND BOX OFFICE AND NO REVISIONS TO EXTERIOR STRUCTURE AT THIS TIME AGREEMENT TO BE PRESENTED TO COUNCIL AT NEXT REG. MTG. RE SHORT FORM 1917 ACT CG AT 14564 PACIFIC AVE. P.H. MARCH 2, 1966 RE COST Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO116941-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 02 02 CC MINHÄ—@¸—0Š Í«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council Resolution No. 66-32 was read by title as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 66-32 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK SETTING A HEARING DATE FOR ANY PROTESTS OR OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS ON WORK COMPLETED UNDER DIVISION 7, PART 3, CHAPTER 27 OF THE STREETS AND HIGH- WAYS CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 14564 Pacific)" COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 66-32 BE APPROVED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN MOREHEAD, GREGORY, ADAIR, MCCARON AND MAYOR CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE 00- City Engineer French requested that Tract No. 25134 and Tract No. 25375 be withdrawn from the Agenda and no action taken. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT TRACT NO. 25134 AND TRACT NO. 25375 BE WITHDRAWN FROM THE AGENDA AND NO ACTION TAKEN. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN MOREHEAD, ADAIR, GREGORY, MCCARON AND MAYOR CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE 00- AT 9:22 P.M. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL RECESS FOR TEN MINUTES. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD SECONDED. There were no objections, the motion carried and was so ordered by Mayor Crites. 00- Mayor Crites asked for a Roll Call which was the same as at the beginning of the meeting with the exception of City Treasurer Pugh who was excused. 00- Mr. Vincent P. Moreno, 4854 Jerry Avenue, Baldwin Park, stated he was here this evening to bring the Council up to date in reference to the Irwindale Racetrack; that they Citizens Committee for maintaining Progress within the City) had obtained two thousand signatures; that they were still circulating petitions; that they were very con- cerned with the lack of support they had received from the local clergy and the local Board of Education; that primarily some of the people had been a little displeased by the action of the City Council; that the people had been told that the Council had extended specific assistance such as the filing of the appeal, the fact that the Council was gracious enough to dig in their own pockets for the filing fee and the courtesy extended by Mr. Nordby in personally taking the appeal to Irwindale; that there had been a committee meeting in his home last evening and it was wondered what the City Council's position or preferrably February 2, 1966 Page 13 RES. NO. 66-32 SETTING A HEARING DATE FOR ANY PROTESTS OR OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT OF THE SUPER- INTENDENT OF STS. ON WORK COMPLETED UNDER DIVISION 7, PART 3, CHAPTER 27 OF THE STS. AND HIGHWAYS CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIF. 114564 Pacific RES. NO. 66-32 ADOPTED FINAL TRACT NOS. 25134 AND 25375 TRACT NO. 25134 AND TRACT NO. 25375 WITHDRAWN FROM AGENDA AND NO ACTION TAKEN RECESS AT 9:22 P.M. RECONVENED AT 9:42 P.M. ROLL CALL VINCENT P. MORENO. 4854 Jerry Ave., B.Pk. RE IRWINDALE RACE TRACK Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO116941-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 02 02 CC MINHÄ—@¸—0Š Í«27. Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council February 2, 1966 Page 14 Mr. Nordby's position was in reference to the seven points that they had previously presented through their agent Mrs. Gregory; that to date they had had no reply; that he realized Mr. Nordby was a busy man; that he had;not been able to reach Mr. Nordby by telephone at the office or at home; that he had one of the committee women get in touch with Mr. Nordby in reference to some issues; that this women had felt the reception she received was not quite favorable; that he was wondering if Mr. Nordby had any news for them in reference to these seven points that they had asked Mrs. Gregory to present. Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated no; that he had no information for them at this time; that he was somewhat disturbed that Mr. Moreno had not contacted him. Mr. Moreno stated he had noted the problem of being unable to communicate with one another and they had asked Mrs. Gregory to get in touch with Mr. Nordby. Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated he had pre- sented Mrs. Gregory with information to take to a meeting to which he was not invited; that he had never been requested to produce any information; that certainly during the next two weeks prior to the meeting some con- tribution could be offered; that he had expressed to Mrs. Gregory that he had been disturbed that Mr. Moreno had never called him. Mr. Moreno again expressed that the cooperation of civic leaders, the clergy and responsible citizens had been very very depressing; that there had not been any; that the Board of Education had referred them to the City Council; that the clergy referred them to organizations that re- ferred them to the Board of Education who referred them to the City Council; that the Board of Education took the same stand that they had not been able to get in touch with them. Mayor Crites stated it was necessary to make a formal request to be heard by the Board of Education; that the Board sets the policy for the School District; that the City Council also sets the policy for the Council action including the actions of the various members of staff; that assuming that someone had made calls was not satisfactory; that he was one of the individuals who signed the appeal to oppose the racetrack situation in the City of Irwindale as an individual; that as the City Council they were not allowed to go and protest this as a City because of the fact the City could not say that the racetrack had damaged the City; that neither could the school stated the racetrack had damaged them or their position until something happened; that this was only a proposed school site up there which did not exactly give them a right to complain about what might happen. Mr. Crites asked if Mr. Moreno had put in a written report to the School Board. Mr. Moreno stated he had been advised this was not necessary; that he thought if they went to the School Board and talked to these people and they did pot give the proper procedure he thought they were as much to blame. He further stated he was before the Council to try to make the views of the committee and the two thousand people that they represented known to the City Council; that he believed it was the duty of the City Council to take these views into consideration. Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated he was employed by the City Council as iCouncii; that he did not take directions from any indiv hWei members of the City Council; that he did take directions from the Council as a body; that he did respect the suggestions of the individual members of the Council; that If Mr. Moreno had used the proper Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO116941-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 02 02 CC MINHÄ—@¸—0Š Í«I I Regular Meeting of the Baldwtn Park City Council February 2, 1 approach he would have presented his case to the Council and the Council in turn would have directed him; that he had attempted, along with the many other duties he had, to cooperate with Mr. Moreno; that he had talked with Mrs. Quiros whose first statement was How come you haven't filed that thing over in Irwindale?"; that he had never heard of the woman before and did not know who she repre- sented; that he had explained to her precisely what he proposed to do; that he filed the protest personally with the money contributed by members of the City Council in Irwindale on a plan that he had discussed with some of the members of the City Council; that he failed to see where he had not cooperated with Mr. Moreno particularly in spite of the fact that they had had their first con- versation at an open Council meeting; that he was not hard to find; that he was at City Hall. Mr. Moreno stated when the committee first approached the City Council they approached the City under the name of Mrs. Quiros; that her name was in the record; that they felt they would like the seven points covered they had mentioned to Mrs. Gregory; that they would gladly take any and all considerations that Mr Nordby and the City Council might be able to muster in their behalf; that he spoke as the chairman of the committee; that these were the wishes of the committee and the people the committee represented. Councilwoman Gregory stated she believed she owed Mr. Moreno an apology; that she had learned tonight that Mr. Nordby did not listen to one member; that she really felt badly about this because when she had spent the better part of a day with Mr. Nordby and the seven points were discussed; that she did not feel she was overstepping her bounds; that she was really acting as a go between between these people because she was home during the day;. that the fact that Mr. Nordby had not acted upon the seven points up until this date did not mean that he wouldn't. Mr. Moreno stated he did owe Mr. Nordby an apology because they were on weak ground and were not aware that Ws. Gregory needed a majority of Council. He stated he would be more than happy to answer any questions the Council might have. 00- Page 15 27,9 Planning Director Chivetta presented a resume of Tentative TENT. TRACT NO. 2923c Tract No. 29239 located on the northerly side of 9edilto Street, westerly of the easterly City boundary line and approximately 428 feet easterly of Puente Avenue, Applicant Nerenb©um & Associates, Inc., E. L. Noseovitx, Agent, Sub- dtvtder, Neptune Deveoopment Company, and stated It was the staff's recommendation the Council concur with the Plan- ning Commission recommendation for approval of the tract as stated in Resolution No. PC 66-5. He stated that the staff further recommended that the subdivider be required to include that portion of property fronting on Ramona Boulevard as part of the subdivision and that the appli- cant be required to dedicate and improve Ramona Boulevard as required by the City Engineer. He pointed out the map on the wall stating it contained approximately twelve 12) acres and would be developed into seventy-three 73) parcels to be utilized for one and two story single family r*si- dences. Mr. Lionel Newfield stated he was the subdivider; that LIONEL NEWFIELD regarding the piece of property lying to the north noted SUBDIVIDER CM on the map this property was not owned by him and was not under his control; that if the Council placed him in the position of having to go back to the seller of the property to get him to improve Ramona Boulevard there was a question of whether or not he would be able to do this and he would prefer not to be faced with this; that it seemed to him that he was furnishing the City of Baldwin Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO116941-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 02 02 CC MINHÄ—@¸—0Š Í«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council February 2, 1966 Page 16 Park the full Improvements in the tract Including street lights, sewers, sidewalks, curbs and.gvttet s; that he was happy to do this but he did not see any point in requiring him to put in improvements on a property that he was not purchasing; that they had deviated in the tract from the City's standards in the situation of the Street called Kenoak Drive where it was fifty-two 52) feet for a short distance rather than a sixty 60) foot street and the same thing was true of the cul-de-sac that extended toward the north from Kenoak Drive; that he requested the Council's consideration of the fifty-two 52) foot street for two reasons; that the street it connected into was presently a fifty-two 52) foot street; that they would main#ain that width until the first intersection to the west which would be the intersection of Kenoak Street and after that they would also go to sixty 60) feet;. that the cul-de-sac was approximately two hundred 200) feet; tttat he requested a fifty-two 521 foot street as otherwise it would cost him two lots; that he did not object to the wall along the north line of the property where it adjoined CM property; that the wall should go in when, as and if the other property was developed; that was more amenable with the wall along the north line; that he did not like the idea of the wall along the east line because of the fact that they adjoined a residential subdivision for all except the C-I frontage to a depth of one hundred 100) feet; that at legst,for other than the distance of the commercial frontage there should be no wall because it would simply be adjoining other residential property; that regarding the westerly line of the property which also was adjoining CM at the meeting of the Planning Commission when this map was approved someone started to make a motion and a suggestion that the property on the west should per- haps be zoned back to residential property and, of course the question arises as to whether or not the person who owned that property would be amenable to such a suggestion; that he was trying to acquire the parcel; that if he could he would request that it be zoned back to R-l. Councilman Adair asked if the Water Company still owned the other parcel. Mr. Newfield stated yes, they did". In answer to a question-by Councilman Morehead, Mr. New- M'R. NEulF TEL0 field stated when a subdivider buys land he does„not have in mind to create so-called substandard streets; that a fifty-two 521 foot street was not substandard; that most cities adopt more flexible standards; that when he pur- chased property he designed it to a maximum number of lots to meet the City standards; that this subdivision had mostly 5500 square foot lots which were over the 5,000 square feet standard; that they did not propose decreasing the street width but suggested decreasing the right-of-way and deducting the footage from the parkway area;. that the City Council had the authority to deviate from the sixty 160) foot street pattern; that the tentative tract previously submitted did not have sixty 60) foot streets; that the time had expired prior to the filing for that map; that Kenoak extending from West Covina had a fifty-two 52) foot right-of-way, thirty- two 32) foot curb t4 curb and that curbs would have to be wat-ped to fit existing West Covina improvement and eliminate traffic hazards; that the roadway would be thirty-six 436) feet by the time got to C" Avenue; Willow Place). M. Nerepbaum, 7466 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, stated that the cul-de-sac served seven 7) lots, two of which were corner lots; that the traffic on this was relatively light;-that all of the rest of the tract was layed out providing the City with minimum standards; that he could give the City sixty 60) foot through that section without the saerefice of lots; that he did not feel the cul-de-sac warranted the sixty 601 foot right-of-way; that the only place they had the question of loss of two 2) lots or take a cul-de-sac serving seven 7) lots and ask for a reduction of parkway only was in the cul-de-sac area. Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO116941-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 02 02 CC MINHÄ—@¸—0Š Í«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council February 2, 1966 Page 17 I City Engineer French stated he had been contacted prior to the submittal of the tentative tract map and that he had told the subdivider that on a fifty-two 52) foot street he would recommend thirty-six 36) foot of paving to allow for the water meters, fire hydrants and trees outside of the sidewalk area. Councilman McCaron asked if on A" Street if it was possible to put the transition on the south side. City Engineer French stated that the Fire Department wanted two fire hydrants on Kenoak on the south side. Mr. Nerenbaum stated they could give additional right-of- way to the street or could provide additional utility easements. City Engineer French stated he would rather have the sidewalk area adjacent to the curb and the easement areas behind. Mr. Nerenbaum stated if it was felt this was an important item he would recommend that in the areas where they have fifty-two 152) feet permit them to keep the fifty-two 52) feet; that they would give the full width between curbs, put full sidewalks in and provide a three 3) or five 5) foot utility easement immediately adjacent on one side or the other or both. Mr. Warren Hamby, 4133 North Benham, Covina, speaking for MR. WARREN HAMBY Covina Irrigation, stated they approved of the zone change; 4133 N. Benham, that they looked favorably upon the subdivision of the Covina property but they had two points they wanted to make clear if they could; that they had three wells on the R-l property; that since they delivered a good deal of water any stopage of drainage through to the south in which the surface flow went would possibly bring them under critisism by the Public Health Department; that there must be some provision to let the drainage flow through into one of those streets or into the cul-de-sac that adjoins it immediately to the south; that there was a great probability that with the changes that were coming about now with the water situation in the Upper San Gabriel Valley Basin that it was highly possible that maybe those wells would not be used ten years from now in which case the property would be subdivided; that if it was subdivided it would be logical to run a street in the miadle of the property from Ramona to the south; that furtt;ermore the sewer was located in Ramona deep enough that they might not be able to reach it; therefore the company thought that some immediate right-of-way or connection should be made so that sewer entrance could be gained into that tract from the 2J acres that Covina Irrigating Company has; that they felt the cul-de-sac going into and ad- joining the yellow piece of property should not be one with little collars of private property which would complicate the situation when they had new owners in the abutting or contiguous properties; that the cul de- sac should it go in should be blunted on the straight for so many feet so that there would be easy access under a City permit should the sewer or drainage need to be taken into that tract. Councilman McCaron stated according to the map the general surface drainage would be abutting Lots 26, 25 and 18. Mr. Hamby stated it was relatively level; that if they had to say where the drainage was received he would say it was in the southwest corner; that it was possible also that the drainage could be brought into the cul-de-sac which was only about one hundred 100) feet away; that they did not intend to drain any of the water wells into the tract; that they had disposal provisions for that Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO116941-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 02 02 CC MINHÄ—@¸—0Š Í«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council February 2, 1966 Page 18 already; that it would only be surface flow; that the Council could see how important it was with the number of domestic users that use that water should they have any mosquito condition or any puddling of water in the south end of that tract even possibly the running down in the well; that they were not talking about any great expense it was just a possible engineering investigation and it would be solved; that he did not see any problem there but he did not want it to be forgotten. Councilman McCaron stated it appeared from the map that it should drain into Avenue A" rather than Avenue C". Mr. Hamby stated the company thought it should not be just a surface drainage of flow across someone's lot who backs up to their property. Mr. Nerenbaum stated they would take care of the drainage from his tract; that he believed one of the conditions in the recommendations provided for an easement subject to the Engineering Department's approval; that Mr. Hamby did bring up one point that he thought was very good; that for the possible future development of this property to the north in that it might not be a bad idea to provide a future street easement at the end of their cul-de-sac to the property line so that this could be extended when and if this were to go; that he was sure the owner would have no objections-to such an easement. Councilman McCaron stated he had in mind an outlot at the end of C" Avenue and at the end of Kenoak Avenue. He asked about the feasibility of a turn around at the end of Kenoak; and if it appeared that the end of Avenue C" was going to be extended sometime in the future possibly a turn around could be considered there rather than a cul- de-sac. City Engineer French stated there, was a standard design for a cul-de-sac within a sixty 60)'foot right-of-way; that it did provide extra turning radius for an automobile which could be put in at the end of Kenoak. Councilman McCaron asked what was thought about the turn around rather than the large cul-de-sac for future develop- ment on C" Avenue. City Engineer French stated that naturally every time a cul-de-sac was straightened out it had quite an effect on the properties in that actually they gain more front yard but it also affected improvements; that C" Street could be designed so that if the R-1 area north of the subdivision were to develop that the curb and gutter could be removed and replaced in a straight line; that Kenoak could be designed to have a cul-de-sac contained within the sixty 60) foot right-"of-way area. Mr. Hamby stated they had other sources of water that might make it unnecessary later on to pump these wells. City Attorney Flandrick stated there was presently pending a rezoning proceeding; that the Planning Commission had recommended or would shortly recommend to the Council the rezoning of all the property included in the subdivision from R-3 to R-l; that the staff would propose a condition that the final tract map and the effective date of the ordinance rezoning the property occur simiitaneously, in other words the recordation of the final map would be on the same day that the ordinance would become effective; that the property to the north marked CM apparently was in fact a part of this subdivision at least in the sense that it was a single parcel of property; that this matter was taken up at the time of the previous tentative tract Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO116941-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 02 02 CC MINHÄ—@¸—0Š Í«4 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council February 2, 1966 Page 19 map and at that point it was in fact included, as he recalled, as a lot; that this problem was worked out at that time with Mr. Sade; that he worked it out with whoever the owner was of the property to the north; that it was in fact included as a lot in the subdivision so that there was a proper division of land. Mr. Newfield stated that Mr. Sade owned that parcel of property; that he purchased the property lying to the south and had no control whatsoever on the property lying to the north. He asked if this was just some legal technicality. City Attorney Flandrick stated in fact it represented at the moment a violation of the tot split ordinance as well as the State Map Act which was well known to Mr. Sade. Mr. Newfield asked if there was not a way that this sub- division could be permitted and still legally permit him to put in the improvements that he wanted to put in for this subdivision; that this land that was being discussed was five hundred 500) feet away. City Attorney Flandrick stated he was talking about the property immediately abutting. Mr. Newfield asked if there was another step that could be taken to split this parcel off from the other. City Attorney Flandrick stated the City was concerned with two things: when did the division of land take place; that the division of land took place whenever Sade sold the balance of the property; that the lot split ordinance had been in effect since 1963; that anyone who, subsequent to that date, divided into less than four 4) but more than two 2) parcels had to comply with that lot split ordinance or in the alternative a subdivision. He further stated that the subdivision as submitted was incomplete because a portion of the property which had been in fact divided was not divided either under the lot split ordinance or under the Subdivision Map Act. He stated that he did not know any other alternative but to have Mr. Sade sign and include the lot. Mr. Newfield stated he did not want to have to be the one to put in the improvements on Ramona Boulevard. City Engineer French asked Mr. Newfield if he owned the property or did he have it in option. Mr. Newfield stated he owned the property. City Engineer French asked if he owned the property in fee. Mr. Newfield stated not completely in fee but he owned the property. City Engineer French stated on the last equalized assess- ment roll the property was in the title of Sade and two others; that the transfer was made in violation of the ordinance; that the normal requirements would call for the dedication and improvement of Ramona Boulevard; that any waiver of this requirement would have to be by the City Council. City Attorney Flandrick stated assuming that Mr. Sade would sign to include the north parcel and assuming the Council would waive the improvements on Ramona Boulevard it could be done and Mr. Sade or anyone he might sell to would still be in a position of having to put the improve- ments in when they develop. Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO116941-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 02 02 CC MINHÄ—@¸—0Š Í«911 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City. Council February 2, 1966 Page 20 Discussion followed regarding the, Ramona Boulevard improve- ments; that there were no improvements on Ramona at the present time. Planning Director Chivetta stated there was a portion of the curb and gutter in along the Covina Irrigation property two hundred 1200) feet easterly of the bridge; that it was not an adequate type of curb and gutter. City Attorney Flandrick stated it may be if the subdivider was willing to attempt to do this; that if he was willing to continue this map to the next regular meeting in the, interim the staff might be able to get in touch with Mr. Sade and determine if he was willing to include this if the Council will favorably consider the we)vfng of the construction of curbs, gutters and sidewalks and also explore the possibility of Sade's dedicating the ten 10) foot; that apparently he agreed to this at a prior time when he was the subdivider. Mr. Newfield suggested that if the Council would give approval subject to that he would then undertake to resolve the problem with Mr. Sade. City Attorney Flandrick stated a condition to that effect could be put in if that was acceptable to the Council although then it would be a condition of approval and if the dedication was not obtained there would not be an. approved final map. Sade sold him something that he did improperly he was quite sure that Mr. Sade did not do this intentially. Mr. Newfield stated he was sure that in the event Mrs Councilman McCaron stated it",night: be that the curbs, gutters and sidewalks cou l dF:f e' %w61.ved. at the present time providing the dedication vas inside add i l`uding the parcel to the north in the subd visidn He,,.furthe stated there were several changes he wou I d I` i'4Ce 4to see,;made; the ou t l of s with the turn around and a sixty 60)' foot.~r Tight-of-way at the end of Kenoak. Mr. A. W. Kirkoff, 140 West College Street,` Covina, stated A. W. KIRKOFF, he was the attorney for Covina Irrigating Company; that the 140 W. College St., only thing they would like to emphasize was that if there Covina was drainage provided that a drainage easement itself or an easement for drainage itself would not seem to be sufficient; that they would ask the Council to make as d condition of approval of this map that any drainage be accompanied by a drainage structure. Councilman McCaron asked if the R-I property had to be signed as part of the subdivision also. City Attorney Flandrick stated no; that Mr. French had advised that that was a separate lot area marked R-i in the upper righthand corner). In answer to a question by Councilman McCaron, City Attorney Flandrick read tt*,condition relating to drainage. City Engineer French stated the City would have to obtain a grading plan and establish the actual drainage of the property and at could be done with it; that If the drainage had to go thrciugh a lot to drain the tract the City would not acceptan open channel; that it would have to be in a covered conduit; that as far as the drainage to C" Avenue it appeared very feasible that this developer could provide a design of C" Avenue with a facility to provide for the drainage of that R-i property to C" Avenue; that if the Council had in mind that it was possible that C" Avenue would be developed and: extended into the R-1 property it would make sense that C" Avenue Continued) oww* BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO116941-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 02 02 CC MINHÄ—@¸—0Š Í«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council 27 February 2, 1966 Page 21 would be designed so as to drain this property. City Attorney Flandrick suggested that the first sentence SECTION 2 a) of Section 2 a) read: That the applicant shad;l submit a grading plan which shall provide proper underground drain- age facilities located in easements to be provided for that purpose which plan, facilities and easement areas shall be acceptable to the City Engineer prior to the final approval of the tract map. I Councilman McCaron stated the other thing would be as short a transition as possible from the thirty-two 32) feet on Kenoak Drive to forty 40) foot face to face curb; that C" Avenue also have forty 40) foot face to face; that in no instance would there be a roadway less than forty 40) foot curb to curb. City Attorney Flandrick stated if he understood that A" Street, B" Street and Kenoak to the west of A" Street would be dedicated-sixty 60) feet but would have forty 40) foot curb.face to curb face.. Councilman McCaron stated yes and then in the arba where there was a fifty..two 52) foot street he would have forty 40) foot face to face street also. City Attorney Flandrick"stated then C" Street would be developed insofar as curb face to curb face area was concerned forty 40) feet in width plus the cul-de-sac area. He asked about the other part of Kenoak where it was designated on the map as sixty 60) feet and the applicant was requesting fifty-two 52) feet. Councilman McCaron stated it would have to be a short transition forty 40) foot face to face; that due to the curves in the street itself they could use a little bit on the south side as a easement to take care of some of the utiiit)es such as fire hydrants. City Attorney Flandrick stated then in other words the area to the east of A" Street on Kenoak where it abuts or connects with the street in West Covina that it would go from a sixty 60) foot overall right-of-way to fifty- two 52) feet with forty 40) feet of curb face at the intersection of A" Street and Kenoak. Councilman McCaron stated it had been stated he would not have room to make sixty 60) feet at that place without disturbing his entire structure but he could, give some easement to have room for fire hydrants that were to go in that block. City Attorney Flandrick stated then it would be a fifty-two 52) foot dedication commencing with Lot 22 and Lot 8 over to its connection in West Covina with forty 40) feet of curb face area narrowing down to thirty-six 36). Councilman McCaron stated a short transition in front of Lots 14 and 15 from the forty 40) to the thirty-two 32) feet. City Attorney Flandrick stated then the City would re- quire as a condition the inclusion of the property still owned by. Mr. Sade, a ten 10) foot dedication and the final map recordation contemporaneously with the s4fective date of the ordinance. He stated if the Council was agreeable to these conditions he would like time to review the changes with'the City Engineer. City Attorney. Flandrick stated he was not sure from the Planning Commission's recommendation as to the location of the walls; that according to I) the proposal was, at least in part, to require the wall adjacent to Lots 7, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18 all of which irnmediately, abut R-I property. Coot1 ftwo) BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO116941-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 02 02 CC MINHÄ—@¸—0Š Í«Regular Mebt.ing of the Baldwin Park City Council February 2, 1905 Page 22 Discussion followed wherein Councilman McCaron stated the reason he suggested the wall adjacenf in 17 and i8--at the present time was that this was unimproved open ground; that the wall could be removed at some future time if it was developed;.that the homes could always use the wall inasmuch as they could drop off what was necessaf y fcr the street and for the front yard setback; that the others were actually backyards all the way around excepting on the CM and the front part from Kenoak Drive, probably just the side yard for one residence was about all there would be, the depth from there on down was commercial property. City Attorney Flandrick stated the Planning Commission's recommendation concerning the wall, if he understood correctly was that the wall would be constructed on the entire easterly, northerly and westerly boundaries of the tract. Discussion followed regarding the wall. Planning Director Chivetta stated usually on subdivisions of this type in excess of fifty 50) parcels being created abutting a commercial or industrial zone a wall wa: required by most municipalities to encompass the entire property as a protection to those persons who would be purc:•-joir'g tnese parcels in the future. He further stated that oI y the easterly side which separated this community from the City of West Covina this would be the rear property line of Lots 15 through 17, the wall could be deleted in that area and also on the side property line adjacent to Lot 14, the wall could be deleted there. Councilman McCaron stated would prefer to leave it in and then they could come back and ask for a waiver after it was determined that it was not necessary. City Attorney Flandrick stated he would like to review the conditions with the City Engineer prior to the adoption of the resolution. As there were no objections, Mayor Crite's stated the COUNCIL TO RETURN Council would proceed to the next item and return to TO ITEM LATER IN MTG. this matter later in the meeting. Planning Director Chivetta presented a resume of Tentative TENT. PARCEL MAP NO. Parcel Map No. 699, located between Stichman Avenue and 699 Vineland Avenue, southerly of Clydewood Street and northerly of Cloverside Street and stated it was the staff's recommenda- tion that the Council concur with the Planning Commission's Resolution No. PC 66-6 and approve the Tentative Parcel Map as submitted. He pointed out a map on the wall showing the existing zoning and the Tentative Parcel Map. In answer to a question by Councilman McCaron, Planning Director Chivetta stated there were three or four individual property owners involved; that Mr. Brooks was representing these people and also owned one of the parcels; that Mr. Brooks owned Parcel(11 recorded as forty-five 45) feet in'Width; that, in order to adjust the property lines to create fifty 501 foot frontages there would have to be an exchange of deeds Lots I and 10); that the lot was a legally recorded lot and was nonconforming as far as the Municipal Code was concerned; that there was nothing the City could do short of forcing Mr. Brooks to try to purchase additional property from the owners of Parcels 2 and 3. Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO116941-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 02 02 CC MINHÄ—@¸—0Š Í«I Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council Mr. Ralph Brooks, 2138 East Huntington Drive, Duarte, stated the two forty-five 45) foot lots had existed there for a great many years; that there were forty-five 45) foot lots at the time of subdivision; that they were not interested in the subdivision on the other side of the street at this time. Mr. Gus Nesseth, 4539 North Center Street, Baldwin Park, stated wherever it was possible where they could adjust lines to get away from forty-five 45) foot lots they would be the first ones to do so; that in this case they could not make any adjustment; that they were trying to clean up the opposite side of the street to make the whole street look good; that they could not get anymore property on the southerly end. City Clerk Balkus read Resolution No. 66-26 by title as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 66-26 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF: THE CITY.QF BALDWIN PARK APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 699 LOCATION: NORTHWESTERLY OF STICHMAN AVENUE, SOUTH- EASTERLY OF VINELAND AVENUE, NORTHERLY OF CLOVERSIDE STREET AND SOUTHWESTERLY OF CLYDEWOOD STREET, IN THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK; APPLICANT AND SUBDIVIDER: BROOKS AND.M,ILLER ET AL)" The conditions of the resolution were reviewed, wherein Planning Director Chivetta stated the City Engineer concurred with the conditions of the Planning Commission. COUNCILMAN MCCARON MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 66-26 BE APPROVED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN MCCARON, MOREHEAD, ADAIR, GREGORY AND MAYOR CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE In answer to a question by Mr. Nesseth concerning the forty-five 45) foot lot, City Attorney Flandrick stated that'he had suggested a change in subparagraph c of Section I to indicate that Parcels I and IO are exist- ing nonconforming lots and do not therefore conform to the minimum standards. He suggested a change also in subparagraph c) of Section 2 to indicate that before any building permits will be issued, for any improvement of Lots I and 10, each of said parcels shall be made' to comply with the provisions of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code relating to zoning regulations by zone variance or otherwise. City Attorney Flandrick stated he understood there was an existing house on one lot; that a variance would have to be obtained to build on the other' lot. Further discussion followed wherein City Attorney Flandrick stated that the front lot which already had on it an exist- ing residential structure was a legal nonconforming lot; that the rear lot was a new lot and was not a lega'l' nonconforming, it was merely nonconforming and therefore a zone variance would have to be obtained to build on it. Mr. Brooks stated they had already started a variance proceeding. Continued) 2'7'5'8 February 2, 1966 Page 23 RALPH BROOKS, 2138 E. Huntington Dr. Duarte GUS NESSETH, 4539 N. Center St., B.Pk. RES. NO. 66-26 APPROVING TENT. PAR- CEL MAP NO. 699 LOCATION: NORTH- $WESTERLY OF STICHMAN AVE., SOUTHEASTERLY OF VINELAND AVE., NORTHERLY OF CLOVER- S.IDE ST. AND SOUTH- WESTERLY OF CLYDE- WOOD ST., IN THE CITY OF B.PK.; APPLICANT AND SUBDIVIDER: BROOK AND MILLER ET AL) RES. NO. 66-26 ADOPTED BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO116941-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 02 02 CC MINHÄ—@¸—0Š Í«9 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council Mr. Nesseth indicated they were trying to start building and he could not get on the Agenda until March. He asked if it was possible to make this lot conform at this time. Planning Director Chivetta stated the case could not be heard before the Board of Zoning Adjustments until March 9. Mr. Nesseth suggested that the Code be improvised so that something of this nature could be handled at the Planning Commission or Engineering level. 00- Planning Director Chivetta reviewed his report on street renaming, Case No. SP-1 stating that the Planning Commission had adopted Resolution No. PC 66-4 recommending to the Council that Root Street be renamed Puente Avenue and that Puente Avenue northerly from the intersection of Root Street and Puente Avenue to Ramona Boulevard be renamed Puente Place; that there was a petition submitted to the Planning Commission opposing the renaming of Puente Avenue to Fortin Avenue; that it was suggested by the petitioners that the name Puente should be retained but that they would consider changing Avenue to Drive, Extension or Lane or other. He further stated if approved the change could be made within a one 1) year period giving notification to the property owners. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL SCHEDULE THAT PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE CHANGING OF STREET NAMES AS RECOMMENDED. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD SECONDED. There were no objections, the motion carried and was so ordered by Mayor Crites. 00- The Council returned to their consideration of Tentative Tract No. 29239. City Attorney Flandrick reviewed the conditions of Resolution No. 66-28. Council discussion followed regarding the street names wherein it was brought out that the Planning Commission should reconsider the naming of B" Street. proposed' Willow Place). City Attorney Flandrick read Resolution No. 66-28 by title as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 66-28 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK APPROVING A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP FOR TRACT NO. 29239" COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 66-28 BE APPROVED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN MCCARON SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN MOREHEAD, MCCARON, ADAIR, GREGORY AND MAYOR CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE February 2, 1966 Page 24 REPORT ON STREET RENAMING CASE NO. SP-1 P.C. REC. THAT ROOT ST. BE RENAMED PUENTE AVE. AND PUENTE AVE. NORTHERLY FROM INTER- SECTION OF ROOT ST. AND PUENTE AVE. TO RAMONA BLVD. BE RE- NAMED PUENTE PL. MOTION MADE AND CARRIED THAT COUNCIL SCHEDULE P.H. FOR CHANGING OF ST. NAMES TENT. TRACT NO. 29239 RES. NO. 66-28 APPROVING A TENT. TRACT MAP FOR TRACT NO. 29239 RES. NO. 66-28 ADOPTED 00- BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO116941-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 02 02 CC MINHÄ—@¸—0Š Í«71 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council February 2, 1966 Page 25 City Clerk Backus read Ordinance No. 436 by title as ORD,. NO. 436 fol lows: ORDINANCE NO. 436 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING SECTION 2602 OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO HOLIDAYS" AMENDING SECTION 2602 OF THE B.P.M.C. RELATING TO HOLIDAYS COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT FURTHER READING OF ORDINANCE FURTHER READING OF NO. 436 BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN MOREH6D SECONDED. There ORD. NO. 436 were no objections, the motion carried and was so ordered WAIVED by Mayor Crites. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 436 BE ORD. NO. 436 ADOPTED. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD SECONDED. The motion ADOPTED carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN GREGORY, MOREHEAD, ADAIR, MCCARON AND MAYOR CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE 00- i City Clerk Balkus read Ordina'nce'N6. 438 by title as ORD. NO. 438 follows: AMENDING CHAPTER 9, ORDINANCE NO. 438 OF-;ARTICLE VII, OF THE B.P.M.C. CONSIST- ING OF SECTIONS 7900 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THROUGH 7915, INCL., THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING AND.REPEALING SECTION' CHAPTER 9, OF ARTICLE VII, OF THE 8801 THROUGH 8824, BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE CONSISTING INCL. OF SAID CODE, OF SECTIONS 7900 THROUGH 7915, INCLUSIVE, RELATING TO HOUSE AND REPEALING SECTIONS 8801 THROUGH MOVING AND RELOCATION 8824, INCLUSIVE OF SAID CODE, RELATING PERMITS TO HOUSE MOVING AND RELOCATION PERMITS" COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT FURTHER READING OF ORDINANCE FURTHER READING OF NO. 438 BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD SECONDED. There were ORD. NO. 438 no objections, the motion carried and was so ordered by Mayor WAIVED Crites. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 438 BE ORD. NO. 438 ADOPTED. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD SECONDED. There were no ADOPTED objections, the motion carried and was so ordered by Mayor Crites. 00- City Clerk Balkus read Ordinance No. 439 by title as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 433 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING CHAPTER VI OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO DANCE AND ENTERTAINMENT PERMITS11 COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT FURTHER READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 439 BE WAIVED. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY SECONDED. There were no objections, the motion carried and was so ordered by Mayor Crites. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 439 BE ADOPTED. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: ORD. NO. 439 AMENDING:CHAPTER VI OF THE B.P..M.C., RELATING TO DANCE AND ENTERTAINMENT PERMITS FURTHER READING OF ORD. NO. 439 WAIVED ORD. NO. 439 ADOPTED Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO116941-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 02 02 CC MINHÄ—@¸—0Š Í«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council AYES: COUNCILMEN MOREIEAD, GREGORY, ADAIR, IJICCARON AND MAYOR CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE City Clerk Balkus read Ordinance No. 440 by title as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 440 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING SECTION 2300.1 OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE, AND REPEALING SECTION 2300.2 OF SAID CODE RELATING TO SALARIES FOR MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL" COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT FURTHER READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 440 BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD SECONDED. There were no objections, the motion carried and was so ordered by Mayor Crites. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 440 BE ADOPTED. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN GREGORY, MOREHEAD, ADAIR AND MAYOR CRITES NOES: COUNCILMAN MCCARON ABSENT: NONE 00- City Clerk Balkus read Resolution No. 66!-36 by title as fol lows: RESOLUTION NO. 66-36 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK APPOINT- ING LEO CAPRONI AND MIKE GERALDI TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF SAID CITY" COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 66-36 BE APPROVED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY SECONDED. There were no objections, the motion carried and was so ordered by Mayor'`Crites. 00- COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT MR. ROBERT LARSON, 4331 NORTH CUTLER, BE APPOINTED TO THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUST- MENTS TO REPLACE MR. E. A. CANNADY. Councilman McCaron stated, in his opinion, there should be a procedure set up so that each member of the Council should have a particular office to fill. Councilwoman Gregory stated in some cities there was a screening procedure. Mayor Crites stated, in his opinion, it should be the Mayor's prerogative to make the appointments with the concurrence of the Council. Councilman Morehead stated he did not see any problem with the present procedure. February 2, 1966 Page 26 ORD. NO. 440 AMENDING SECTION 2300.1 OF THE B.P.M.C AND REPEALING SECTION 2300.2 OF SAID CODE RELATING TO SALARIES FOR MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FURTHER READING OF ORD. NO. 440 WAIVED ORD. NO. 440 ADOPTED RES. NO. 66-36 APPOINTING LEO CAPRONI AND MIKE GERALDI TO THE P.C. OF SAID CITY RES. NO. 66-36 ADOPTED. MOTION MADE THAT ROBT. LARSON BE APPOINTED TO BZA Con+inued) BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO116941-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 02 02 CC MINHÄ—@¸—0Š Í«2812. Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council February 2, 1966 Page 27 In answer to Councilwoman Gregory, City Attorney Flandrick stated that some of the other cities'had simply requested whoever was interested in filling a position file a letter of application which was screened by the staff; that the Council then called the interested individuals in and interviewed them as to their qualifications to fill the particular job. Councilwoman Gregory stated she thought this was a good idea. Mayor Crites stated that he had had one man hand him a paper in which he stated his qualifications and his desire to serve the City; that he had told the man he would place his name before the group for consideration; that his name was Ralph C. J. Smith, 14219 East Ohio Street. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY SECONDED. Further discussion followed. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN MOREHEAD, GREGORY, ADAIR, MCCARON AND MAYOR CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE Further discussion followed. City Clerk Balkus read Resolution No. 66-37 by title as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 66-37 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE'CITY OF BALDWIN PARK APPOINTING ROBERT LARSON TO THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS OF SAID CITY" City Attorney Flandrick stated if this resolution was adopted, the appointment would take effect immediately. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 66-37 BE APPROVED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILWOMAN G!.EGORY SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN MOREHEAD, GREGORY, ADAIR, MCCARON AND MAYOR CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE Chief Administrative Officer Nordby reported on a seminar he had attended on January 27 and 28 at Long Beach stating that the title of the seminar which was sponsored by the Work Shop Conference for City Managers in conjunction with U.S.C. was Managing Your Time". He stated this conference was very beneficial and he wanted to express his appreciation to the Council for allowing him to attend. 00- City Clerk Balkus read Resolution No. 66-31 by title as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 66-31 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK ALLOWING CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK" Continued) MOTION SECONDED MOTION CARRIED RES. NO. 66-37 APPOINTING ROST. LARSON TO THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS OF SAID CITY RES. NO. 66-37 ADOPTED REPORT BY C.A.O. ON SEMINAR RES. NO. 66-31 ALLOWING CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AGAINST CITY OF B.PK. GENERAL CLAIMS AND DEMANDS NOS. 888-939 INCL. PAYROLL CLAIMS ANC DEMANDS NOS. 3097- 3226 INCL. BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO116941-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 02 02 CC MINHÄ—@¸—0Š Í«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Counc,il,.. February 2, 1966 Page 28 COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT RESO'LUT`ION NO. 66-31 BE RES. NO. 66-31 APPROVED AND FURTHER READING BE WAND. COUNCILMAN ADOPTED ADAIR SECONDED. The mot i on' Carr ied by the f,, 41 owitrg vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN MOREHEAD, ADAIR, GREGORY, MCCARON AND MAYOR CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE 00- AT 12:10 A.M. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT THE CITY ADJ. AT 12:10 A.M. COUNCIL ADJOURN. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY SECONDED. There were no objections, the motion carried and was so ordered by Mayor Crites. ITES, MAYOR APPROVED:I'l 1966. Date of Distribution to City Council Date of Distribution to Departments 00- THELMA L. BALKUS, CITY CLERK v2~ 1966 1966. BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO116941-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 Í«Regular Meeting, of the Baldwin Park City Council February 2, 1966 Page 8 the staff recommendation was that the Council find that N-12 was in fact a public nuisance and order the same abated. TESTIMONY IN BEHALF OF THE NUISANCE ABATEMENT WAS CALLED TESTIMONY IN BEHALF FOR BY MAYOR CRITES. Mr. William Ramos, 5160 Serreno Drive, Temple City, stated WM. RAMOS, 5160 he was one of the owners of the property; that the property Serreno Dr., T.C. was purchased or speculation; that Mr. Sam Reutenberg was the other owner; that although it was not purchased with the idea of either prrtner living on the premises, Mr. Reutenberg was staying on the premises from time to time and would not let him clean up the premises. Discussion followed that the abatement would be a lien against the property; that the payment would be the obligation of all owners. Mr. Ramos stated he agreed this premises was a public nuisance and gave background information on Mr. Sam Reutenberg regarding the partnership. He stated that his son was buying the second trust deed and would fore- close. Mr. David Ramos, 1365 Citrus Drive, La Habra, stated he DAVID RAMOS, had recently purchased the second mortgage; that he'was 1365 Citrus Dr., the son of William Ramos; that he was against the abate- La Habra ment of the house; tat there were possibilities of bring- ing it up to standard; that the other structures would warrant being torn down. Building Superintendent Kalbfleisch stated the house could be brought up to Coda by major repair; that at the present time it was a nuisance. Discussion followed regarding Mr. Sam Reutenberg. In answer to a question by City Attorney Flandrick, Building Superintendent Kalblfeisch stated the building itself was structurally safe and sound but the phy5;cal wall areas on the exterior and interior were in bad need of painting and repair; that, in his opinion, it wo_!Id cost approximately $1500.00 maximum for the necessary repairs; that some electrical work was necessary; that the plumbing was all right at the time of inspection. Mr. David Ramos stated he did major repair work as a side line; that the only real problem would be some cement work in the service porch and a few electrical connections; that if it would please the Council he could possibly paint the outside and clear the yard where possibly the other owner would not bother until foreclosure proceed- ings take place and then the entire thing could be cleared out. Councilman McCaron pointed out that the zoning of the property was M-I and a variance would be required to be able to repair this house. City Attorney Flandrick stated he would suggest that the Council consider continuing this public hearing to the next regular meeting providing that Mr. Ramos and his father between now and then obtain the services of some Attorney and get the processing of the problem started; that if at the next meeting they have failed to take this,step the Council could proceed at that time for abatement of all or any portion of the premises including buildings and structures. Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO116941-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/5/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06