HomeMy WebLinkAbout1966 06 16 CC MIN1966 06 16 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 1 ¯
Í«2977
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL JUNE 16, 1966
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER) 14403 East Pacific Avenue 4:00 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park met in
adjourned regular session at the above place at 4:00 p.m.
Roll Call: Present: COUNCILMEN CRITES AND MOREHEAD
AND MAYOR MCCARON
Absent: COUNC i LMAN; ADA I R, CITY-ENGINEER
ROLL CALL
FRENCH, BUILDING SUPERINTENDENT
KALBFLEISCH, PLANNING DIRECTOR
CHIVETTA, FINANCE DIRECTOR
DUNCAN, CHIEF OF POLICE ADAMS,
CITY TREASURER PUGH AND CITY
CLERK BALKUS
Also Present: DEPUTY CITY CLERK LANGSETH
COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL RECESS
FOR TEN MINUTES. COUNCILMAN CRITES SECONDED. There
were no objections, the motion carried and was so
ordered by Mayor McCaron.
00-
I
At 4:10 p.m. the Council reconvened with Councilwoman
Gregory, Chief Administrative Officer Nordby and
City Attorney Flandrick present.
In preparation for a conference scheduled with Frank G.
Bonelii on Monday, June 20, 1966, at 9:30 a.m., Chief
Administrative Officer Nordby reviewed his report on
parks and recreation stating he had placed before the
Council a few questions which had occurred to him
regarding the dissolution of the Baldwin Park Recreation
and Park District; that approximately two years ago the
City of Rosemead had adopted a resolution which reorganized
their Park District Board; that they had adopted a
temporary interim measure; that the present park and
recreation district tax was $.204; that this was identified
separately on the tax bill; that they expect to have
enough revenue next year so they would not have to
levy a tax and still support a city park program.
Mayor McCaron asked as far as the tax was concerned
would it have to be incorporated with the City tax.
City Attorney Elandrick stated it was incorporated In
the sense that the Council would set it, but it appeared
on the tax bill as a separate item; that it would not
be included in the general city tax as such; that it
could not be used for anything else as there was an
absolute restriction on that.
Mayor McCaron stated he was in favor of the parks being
taken over by the City rather than taking the method
that Rosemead did; that the City should try to
consolidate all of the parks and put them all under
one jurisdiction.
Continued)
RECESS FOR TEN
MINUTES
RECONVENED AT 4:10
P MO COUNCILWOMAN
GREGORY, C.A.O
NORDBY AND CITY
A11 Y FL ANDR I CK
PRESENT
RE MTG. SCHEDULED
WITH FRANK G. BONELLI
ON JUNE 20, 1966,
TO DISCUSS PARKS
AND RECREATION
BIB]
39576-U01
1966-U02
06-U02
16-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116938-U03
DO117001-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/7/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1966 06 16 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 1 ¯
Í«29'78
Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council June 16, 1966
Page 2
City Attorney Fiandrick stated it was not up to the
Council to decide whether or not an election would have
to be held for dissolution,it,was a matter for the
Board of Supervisors and the Local Agency Formation
Commission; that there should be a good strong showing
that there was a necessity for dissolution and a showing
that the City had programmed it in terms of what the
City was going to do and what the schedule was going to
be,
Mayor McCaron stated it appeared to him that there had not
been proper educational programs before the previous
elections; that the ballot had simply indicated the
dissolution of the park district and anyone who did
not have any background on it would naturally assume
the parks would be discontinued.
Councilwoman Gregory stated at the time the election took
place there were approximately 15,000 to 20,000 people in
Baldwin Park; that she thought there was enough publicity
at that time; that the wording of the ballot was the
important item.
City Attorney Flendrick stated the members of the Council CITY ATTY. OPINION
would have the right to write a ballot argument which RE DISSOLUTION BY
went along with the ballot and also had the right of ELECTION
approval of the language on the ballot itself; that the
ballot could be accompanied by a statement in favor of
the dissolution and could include what the Council pro-
posed to do and why the Council was asking for dissolu-
tion. He further stated If this went to an election he
would suggest that it be done on the basis of a Special
Election rather than try i ng to comb i a i e i f with the November
election because things would be so confused at that
time it would get lost in the shuffle; that he would
suggest that the ballot argument include the fact that
the Council was attempting to get back $168,000 that
the County had placed in the General Fund; that if it
had been a matter of local control these funds would
have been utilized by the City to incorporate in exist-
ing parks or for acquiring new parks; that this would not
mean that the City would dissolve and eliminate the
parks; that the parks would remain and the City had a
program for additional facilities and additional parks;
that most of the time when there was a situation where
it was clearly spelled out and the members of the Council
were willing to spend some time making comments to
various groups there was not too much trouble.
Mayor McCeron stated it appeared the Council was concerned
with two things besides the taking over of the parks:
the $168,000 for the s e of Barnes Park and the accumula-
tion of funds for improvements in Morgan Park and Barnes
Park, which the City did not want to lose; that the City
would want to derive t`J s benefit if it meant holding off
acquiring the parks until this money tins actually spent;
that the timing should be considered.
City Attorney Flandrick stated that Mr. Norman S. Johnson,
Director, Los Angeles County Parks and Recreation, had
stated that on this or any other district their recommenda-
tion was and would be for dissolution; that they could
not service the parks they have; that presumably the Board
of Supervisors would go along with this concept; that if
there was a dlssoiut?oa the existing physical facilities, CONVEYANCE OF PHYSICAL
land, and denteIopmen--s on the land, would be conveyed to FACILITIES, LAND,
the City by he nit there would be a deed restric- DEVELOPMENT
tion that the area could only be used for park purposes;
Continued)
BIB]
39576-U01
1966-U02
06-U02
16-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116938-U03
DO117001-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/7/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1966 06 16 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 1 ¯
Í«2979
Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council June 16, 1966
Page 3
that the County had altered that program slightly in that where
there had been an incorporation or annexation and dissolution
of the district they would convey in that manner but would
permit streets to be Out through or widened if the City
advised them in advance of what was intended and that the
City could do one of two things: set aside x" number of
dollars out of the General Fund! or Gas Tax Fund or another
fund to put into the park program or buy other land and
replace what the City was using for street purposes; that
the County was pretty lenient on this; that as far as the
funds from the District there was an accounting that would
be made prior to the effective date of the dissolution and
the surplus would be transferred to the City, again with
the restriction as to use only for park purposes; that as
far as the $168,000 it was.unlikely the City would get this
back in cash; that Mr. Johnson had suggested that as a
part of the dissolution program with the County the Council
request the Board of Supervisors, and his department would
support the request, to have the existing County staff
continue at the County's expense for a period of one or
two years; that there was no legal obligation on their
part to pay back but there was certainly a moral obliga-
tion.
Councilwoman Gregory asked about the $151,000 that had BUILDING FUND
been budgeted towards a new building.
City Attorney Flandrick stated he thought this money
would be refunded but here again was an aroa of negotiation.
Chief Administrative Office Nordby stated if this was
accrued from the District tax certainly the County would
be legally and morally obligated to return this money to
the City.
Mayor McCaron stated it showed on the budget as accumulated
money for the building.
City Attorney Flandrick stated this should be taken up
at the time of the meeting with Supervisor Bonelli
and Mr. Johnson.
Discussion followed wherein City Attorney Flandrick
stated from the $168,000 the County had spent $30,000
or $40,000 for minor improvements and the sewer assess-
ment on the property; that there was a little in excess
of $100,000 left that they had derived from the con-
demnation; that Mr. Johnson's attitude on that would be
to work through Mr. Bonelli's office and try to obtain
the return of that fund from the County Slush"
Fund for streets or in the alternative a program of
two years free service of County personnel.
Councilwoman Gregory stated the Park Board had been
working toward a larger park program; that the park sites
had gone by the wayside the last ten years by developers
and so forth; that the City had not made an effort, until
recently, to acquire any land; that the Park Board was
desirous of having land returned to them somewhere; that
this City was large enough to support more than two parks.
Mayor Mc Caron stated he would not be in favor of increasing
the tax or taking other funds to buy additional land until
such time as the City had developed the parks it had to
where they could be fully utilized; that he did not
favor buying more grou.rra{ and letting gt lay idle.
i::ostinuedl
BIB]
39576-U01
1966-U02
06-U02
16-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116938-U03
DO117001-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/7/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1966 06 16 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 1 ¯
Í«2?-
Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council June 16, 1966
Page 4
l t Fs;
Councilwoman Gregory stated th~ai ottaar'tties had J
that the idea was that the property vE:; 2 ues w ut up et+cn year;
that there were two parks in the Park District, and they were
being utilized; that the piece the City acquired would never
be a park, it would be a picnic areas
City Attorney Flandrick stated the only matter the Board
of Supervisors would be concerned with was did the Cite
have a program.
Discussion followed regarding developing the parks the
City had before acquiring more land or acquiring i;.nd
at the present time.
Councilwoman Gregory stated the Fresno pls as w?s
good and would be adaptable; that Tfl w:s for the cities
to move in on the schools and use one, two, or three
acres, whatever was available, and this would make
walk-to parks.
Councilman Crites stated he was in agreement to try to
get the County to let the City have jurisdiction and con-
trol over the parks and recreation; that the City would
be getting increased local control; that W. Garrowr of
the Baldwin Park Improvement Association had given him the
idea that someone named Barnes donated approximately J of
the land of Barnes Park; that he believed some of the money
could be returned in the way of improvements if the City
could not get it back in cash; that improving and obtaining
other sites should be upper most in the Council2s mind.
City Attorney Fl andr ick stated that Mr. Norman Johnson
would not be at the meeting but qtr. Ed Manes, h i s
principal deputy, would be.
Councilman Crites stated it should be pointed out to the
citizens that this would be a disbanding for the purpose
or reorganizing.
Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated he was convinced
the City had no alternative but to take the action of
dissolution; that, in his opinion, it should be accomplished
at the commencement of a fiscal year; that there would be
a year for an educational program.
Mayor McCaron stated there should be a program outlined
ahead of time as to how this was to be handled.
Councilman Morehead stated he believed as soon as the
City could the District should be dissolved and become a
City facility; that he would like to see the easiest
transition possible; that if it could be dissolved without
an election he would be for that; that if the County and
the Local Agency Formation Commission thought it should
go to an election he would campaign for that; that he would
certainly like to feel whatever invested interest that
the citizens had was all being returned; that if it came
in form of cash, fine, or if it came in the form of
salaries for park personnel this was fine; that he would
not want the City to lose any of the building fund. He
asked if the park district was dissolved and Irwindale,
City of Industry and the City of West Covina were asked
to deannex and the park district and city boundaries would
be the same, how much assessed valuation would the City
lose.
Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated very little;
that in the current budget he recalled that the three
totaled approximately J million; that this compared to
i~oastinuedi
FRESNO PLAN
BIB]
39576-U01
1966-U02
06-U02
16-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116938-U03
DO117001-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/7/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1966 06 16 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 1 ¯
Í«Adjourned Regular MMMleeting of the Baldwin Park City Council June 16, 1966
Page 5
I
the 42 million in the district would be a negligible amount.
Councilman Morehead stated if the Park District was dissolved
he did not think the City should have any jurisdiction
outside of its boundaries wherein Chief Administrative
Officer Nordby stated he agreed.
Discussion followed that there was some County territory
in the Park District also.
Councilman Morehead asked what would be the limitation on
the Park District Tax.
City Attorney Flandrick stated there was no legal limitation.
Discussion followed.
City Attorney Flandrick suggested, rather than the
Council taking any formal action at this time, that
the only points Supervisor Bonelli was concerned with
were the problems concerning the return of funds
derived from the condemnation and the dissolution.
Discussion followed regarding a spokesman for the
conference.
Councilwoman Gregory commented that as far back as
July 18, 1955, park land had been taken for the San
Bernardino Freeway.
Mayor PM1cCaron asked if Councilwoman Gregory had
anything to show how Barnes Park was acquired.
Councilwoman Gregory stated the Board of Supervisors HOW BARNES PARK
records showed that in 1954, with the help of Elwin School WAS ACQUIRED
P.T.H. and the citizens, the property now known as Barnes
Park was acquired by Los Angeles County from General Funds;
that because the policy of the Board of Supervisors was
not in developing local parks with money from the General
Fund, the Board of Supervisors accepted and passed on the
recommendation from the Los Angeles County Department of
Parks and Recreation to authorize the Baldwin Park Recrea-
tion and Park District to proceed with the development of
Barnes Park from District Funds. She stated she had this
information in legal letters; that there were no figures
as to what the County paid for the property but approximately
a total of $50,000 was expended from District funds for the
development of Barnes Park; that these two parks were
operated under the authority of the Public Resources Code;
that on January I, 1962, by State Law, this Park District
reorganized; that this revision allowed certain contractual
leniencies; that the title to Morgan Park was now in the
name of the District but the Board of Supervisors was the
governing and the legal board and the boundaries of the
Baldwin Park Recreation and Park District were generally
or approximately the same as those of the Baldwin Park
Unified School District.
P;'tayor McCaron suggested that the Council should discuss
the three main items at the confernece and forget the
small details.
Councilman Morehead asked, in the event the Park District
was dissolved and became a City park, how could the City
get zone code areas not in the Park District now into
the City Park District, for instance the Americana Homes.
Continued)
BIB]
39576-U01
1966-U02
06-U02
16-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116938-U03
DO117001-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/7/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1966 06 16 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 1 ¯
Í«2
Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council June 16, 1966
Page 6
City Attorney Flandrick stated all properties within the
City would be in the City Park District automatically.
Discussion followed that the Administrative overhead of the
County ran 28% to 30%; that the Board of Supervisors as
the supervising authority would convey title of Morgan
Park to the City; that the Board of Supervisors would
convey the title of Barnes Park.
City Attorney Flandrick stated the Council would want to
outline a program, stating what would be done if the
dissolution was approved; secondly the Council would
want to get the Park Board, or at least a majority of
the members, to go on record, by resolution or otherwise,
saying they were in favor of the proposal as such; that
once this was accomplished the Council would want to conduct
an informal hearing asking people to come in and explain
what the Council was proposing to do describing it as
being the unveiling of the Baldwin Park Park and Recreation
program; that after these three items were accomplished
the Council could state the City Council, the Board of
Supervisors, the County Park Department and the Baldwin
Park Park Board had all agreed that this should be
accomplished without an election; that the Council had
held a hearing, the opposition constituted, however many
it was; that then the Council had the basis of stating
there was no need for an election.
Councilwoman Gregory stated she thought if was advisable SUGGESTION OF
to have an adjourned meeting with the Park Board after ADJ. MTG. WITH
the Council had met with Supervisor Bonelli and have the PARK BOARD
program straightened out in their own minds. She stated
when the Park Board had met with the Council they had
indicated they would like to have an Advisory Board which
possibly still could be done.
Discussion followed regarding the members of the Park Board;
that this particular group was probably the major force in
petitioning out the election the last time; that the pro-
cedure for dissolution would take approximately four or
five months, however there would be internal problems if
the parks were taken over before the next fiscal year;
that the extra time could be used to educate the people as
to what was going on thus possibly obviating the necessity
for an election; that the newsletter would be a real help
in this regard.
It was decided to meet for a no host breakfast prior to
the 9:30 a.m. meeting scheduled with Supervisor Bonelli
on Monday, June 20, 1966.
00-
Chief Administrative Officer Nordby asked for an adjourned REQ. FOR ADJ. MTG.
meeting prior to the end of the fiscal year to take action FOR ACTION ON FINAL
on the final annual amendment to the budget; that these AMENDMENT TO BUDGET
amendments were expenditures which had been approved by
the Council but had not been relected in an amendment to
the budget; that there was no change in the amount of the
appropriations.
00-
Councilwoman Gregory passed to the Council copies of the ORAL INTERVIEW
West Covina oral interview rating sheets for.city RATING SHEETS
commissioners and boards. She stated the regular applica- FOR CITY COMMISSIONERS
tion form for employment was used for the people to AND BOARDS
apply for the different positions.
Continued)
BIB]
39576-U01
1966-U02
06-U02
16-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116938-U03
DO117001-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/7/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1966 06 16 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 1 ¯
Í«Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council
Mayor McCaron stated that some of the questions on the
regular employment application should be eliminated. June 16,
Page 7 1966
00-
i
Councilwoman Gregory stated she would like to discuss RE HUMAN RELATIONS
the matter of a Human Relations Council; that there was COUNCIL
one council for La Puente, West Covina and Covina. She
stated It was her opinion that the City should have such
a Council working as a department within the City Hall
under the jurisdiction of the Chief Administrative Officer;
that the reports of this Human Relations Council would
also come to the City Council and then the City Council
would know of any problems arising within the City; that
also any department Involved could be alerted to problems;
that the Human Relations Council would be in touch with
the minority groups and would also be in touch with other
Human Relations Councils and be aware of problems through-
out the valley.
Mayor McCaron stated he would like to see a brief resume
of the function of this group; that one reads about
Human Relation groups having trouble among themselves
and creating dissention; that there should be a pro-
cedure set up to where this could be avoided.
Councilwoman Gregory stated having a Human Relations
Council in this City would show the people that the City
Council was interested in the minority groups; that she
thought the Council would avert more problems and
trouble by having such a Council.
Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated he would C.A.O. TO PROVIDE
provide whatever background information that was BACKGROUND INFORMA-
available. TION ON HUMAN
RELATIONS COUNCIL
00-
AT 5:30 P.M. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT THE CITY ADJ. AT 5:30 P.M. TO
COUNCIL ADJOURN TO WEDNESDAY, JUNE 22, 1966, AT 7:30 WED,, JUNE 22, 1966,
P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER OF THE CITY HALL. COUNCIL- AT 7:30 P.M. IN
MAN CRITES SECONDED. There were no objections, the CODICIL CHAMBER OF
motion carried and was so ordered by Mayor McCaron. CITY HALL
00-
APPROVED:
THELMA L. BALKUS, CITY CLERK
1966.
Date of Distribution to City Council 1966.
Date of Distribution to Departmentsolxuqoj' 1966.
BIB]
39576-U01
1966-U02
06-U02
16-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116938-U03
DO117001-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/7/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1966 06 16 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 1 ¯
Í«ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE 13ALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL JUNE 16, 1966
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER) 14403 East Pacific Avenue 4:00 P.M.
I
The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park met in
adjourned regular session at the above place at 4:00 p.m.
Roll Cal I: Present: COUNCILMEN CRITES, MOREHEAD ROLL CALL
AND MAYOR MCCARON Counci l woman
Gregory arrived at 4:13 P.m-)
Absent: CITY ENGINEER FRENCH, BUILDING
SUPERINTENDENT KALBFLEISCH,
PLANNING DIRECTOR CHIVETTA,
FINANCE DIRECTOR DUNCAN, CHIEF
OF POL:[CE ADAMS, CITY TREASURER
PUGH AND CITY CLERK BALKUS
Also Present: DEPUTY CITY CLERK LANGSETH
Chief Administrative Officer
Nordby and City Attorney Flandrick
arrived at 4:13 p.m.)
00-
AT 5:30 P.M. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADJ. AT 5:30 P.M.
ADJOURN TO WEDNESDAY, JUNE 22, 1966, AT 7:30 P.M. IN THE TO WED., JUNE 22,
COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF THE CITY HALL„ COUNCILMAN CRITES 1966, AT 7:30 P.M.
SECONDED. There were noobjections, the motion carried and IN COUNCIL CHAMBER
was so ordered by Mayor McCaron. OF CITY HALL
00-
i
DATED: June 17, 1966
TIME 8:30 A.M.
BIB]
39576-U01
1966-U02
06-U02
16-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116938-U03
DO117001-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/7/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1966 06 16 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 1 ¯
Í«AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE
OF ADJOURNMENT OF MEETING
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) SS:
CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
THELMA L. BALKUS, being first duly sworn, says and deposes:
that 1 am the duly chosen, qualified and acting City Clerk of the City
Council of the City of Baldwin Park; that at a Regular
Meeting of the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park held
June 15 19 66 said meeting was ordered adjourned to
the time and place specified in the Notice of the Adjournment ATTACHED
HERETO: that on June 16 19...67, at the hour of 9:30 a.m.,
I posted a copy of said Notice at a conspicuous place on or near the
door of the place at which said meeting of June 15 19,
was held.
THELMA L. BALKUS, CITY CLERK
I
Subscribed and sworn to
before me this
day of 7 GZ-2/
1912
fA'CKQUELEAN ROADY
My Commission Expires Feb. 24, 1 C,69
BIB]
39576-U01
1966-U02
06-U02
16-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116938-U03
DO117001-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/7/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1966 06 16 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 1 ¯
Í«AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE
OF ADJOURNMENT OF MEETING
I
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) SS:
CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
THELMA L. BALKUS, being first duty sworn, says and deposes:
that I am the duly chosen, qualified and acting City Clerk of the City
Council of the City of Baldwin Park; that at a Adjourned Regular
Meeting of the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park held
June 1 6 19 66 said meeting was ordered adjourned to
the time and place specified in the Notice of the Adjournment ATTACHED
HERETO: that on June 17 19 66 at the hour of 8:30
a.m.,
I posted a copy of said Notice at a conspicuous place on or near the
door of the place at which said meeting of June 1.6 19 66
was held.
THELMA L. BALKUS, CITY CLERK
I
Subscribed and sworn to
before me this day of
19 /
L.
Notary,'ublic in and for
said County and State
JACKQUELEAN ROADY
My Commission Expires Feb. 24, 1 968
BIB]
39576-U01
1966-U02
06-U02
16-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116938-U03
DO117001-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/7/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
ADJOURNED-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06