HomeMy WebLinkAbout1966 07 06 CC MIN1966 07 06 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 1 ÉÍ«2991
I
REGULAR MEETING CF THE BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL JULY 6, 1966
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAAMBfER) 14403 East Pacific Avenue 7:30 P.M.
in. accordance with Section 2703 of the Municipal Code
the City Council met in open meeting at 7:00 p.m, in
the Conference Room for an Informal session with the
staff to be informed on regular agenda items,
The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park met in
regular session at the above place at 7:30 p,m,
Councilman Adair led the salute to the flag. FLAG SALUTE
nil all: Present: COUNCILMEN ADAIR AND GREGORY, ROLL CALL
AND 1AYOR. PRO TEN'. MOREHEAD
Absent: CCUN•NC I LMAN
F'.1T A'1r CITY
Also F'resent: CNi.`, A.t,'!f'I 7RATiVE v--R!CER
1rt t r", CITY ATTORNEY FLAMDRICK,
A' T' A1T CITY ENGINEER ROGUE,
I_ 1G t_'P I f'sT"T'1DF1'!T KALI;FLE I SOH,
AM111'16 rC T CH i VETTH 1 N NCE
DIRECTOR DUNCAN, AND CITY CLERK
3ALKU:; Chief of Police Adams
arrived at 7:43 p.m.)
C U4!t L JOPtw'.( G EG. FRY THAT r;,YC MCC, ON, GUNC I LiyL N MAYOR A CCAR<ON,
E:.
T ANC) i T" NG 1_NCH a,U COUNC I L! AN' COUNCILMAN 0311'
%,A LftN U. There were no objections, the motion AND CITY ENGINE-
carried and was so ordered by i,,ayor pro tem Morehead, FRENCH EXCUSED
00-
At 7:35 p.m. Finance Director uncap was excused from the 7:35 P.M. F INANCE
Council Chamber. Dll:. DUNCAN EXCUSED
00..
I
Mr. James A. Garrow, 1011 North Baldwin Park Boulevard, JAP S A. GARROW,
Baldwin Park, representing the Baldwin Park improvement 1011 N. B.Pk. Blvd.,
Association, stated that they were glad things were B. Pk., REPRESENTING
progressing in the matter of the money for the land that B.PK. IMPROVEMENT
s acquired for thy: fre ways from Barnes lark; that A1350C.
the money should be used for approximately three 3)
ser~tl1 ti 2) acre or three acre plots for parks
one located south of the railroad tracks, one In the
north part of the nd: one In the east; that they
strongly urged that when money was acquired that
it be used for thTs purpose; that they wished the
City all success and would be glad to help in matters
where they could be of help.
Mayor pro tem Morehead stated at this time the City did
not know how much money would be received; that whatever
amount was transferred to.the City would be used for park
expansion; that the Improvement Association and all other
groups that were interested would have a big hand In
helping the City Council and the Park Board design and
establish these parks; that Chief Administrative Officer
Nordby was working on a report on the items and Informa-
tion that he had at hand for public Information; that this
nformation would be in the next newsletter.
URGING THAT MONEY
YET TO B ACQUIRED)
FOR LAND THAT WAS
ACQUIRED FOR FREEWAYS
FROM BARNES PARK TO
BE USED FOR 3 MALL
PARKS
BIB]
39576-U01
1966-U02
07-U02
06-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116938-U03
DO117004-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/7/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1966 07 06 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 1 ÉÍ«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council
City Clerk Balkus presented a letter from F. Stoskus et al
dated Juke 23, 1966, regarding the proposed R-l regulation
amendments.
City Attorney Flandrick suggested that the Council note
and file this; that they would be having another public
hearing on this matter.
As there were no objections, Mayor pro tem Morehead so
ordered.
00-
City Attorney Flandrick explained that Resolution No.
66-173 had been requested by the Council in connection
with Z-291; that the conditions have been imposed prior
to the rezoning of the property.
RESOLUTION NO. 66-173 DECLARING
ITS INTENTION TO REZONE CERTAIN
HEREAFTER DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY
Case Number: Z-291; Location:
13703-13725 Los Angeles Street,
and 4418 Walnut Street; Applicant:
Strowburgh)
COUNCILMAN ADA I R MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 66-I 73 BE
ADOPTED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. MAYOR PRO TEM
MOREHEAD SECONDED. Roll Call. There were no objections,
the motion carried.
City Attorney Flandrick presented Ordinance No. 456
stating this was for first reading only and in view
of the adoption of Resolution No. 66-173 second read-
ing would not be given until conditions were met.
ORDINANCE NO. 456 AtVIEND I NG THE
ZONING MAP OF SAID CITY, AND
REZONING CERTAIN HEREIN DESCRIBED
REAL PROPERTY FROM ZONE R-3 TO C-2
ZONE CASE NO. Z-291)
COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT FURTHER READING OF
July 6, 1966
Page 2
LETTER. FROM F. ti TOSKU'
ET AL t•:ATED
1966, 1;' P~t11 is r_~:
R-I REGULATION AIY` END-
K NTS
NOTED AND FILES
RES. NO. 66-173
DECLARING INTENT.
TO REZONE CERTA I N
HEREAFTER DESCRIBED
REAL. PROPERTY CASE
NO.: Z-291; LOCATION:
13703-31725 L.A. ST.,
AEU) 441€ WALNUT 5,T.;
AFPL ICANT: S'i ROWBURGH)
RES. NO. 66--173
ADOF TE D
SECOND READ I NG OF
ORE). NO. 456 TO BE
HELL) UNTIL CONDITIONS
lOF RES NO. 66-173
A' IE MET
ORL). NO. 456
NN\END. ZON. MAP
OF MIU CITY, AND
RE. ZON I NG CEi TA 111
HEREIN DES.CR I BE B
REAL PROPERTY iF;P'014
ZONE R-3 TO C-2
ZONE CASE NO. 7-29
FURTHER READ INS
ORDINANCE
SECONDED.
carried. NO. 456 BE A I VED COUNC I LIMN ADAIR
There were no objections, the motion OF ORB
WA I VE D NO. 1-56
COUNC I LWNWOMAW GREGORY MOVED THAT ORB I NANCE NO. 456 BE
INTRODUCED. COUNCILMAN ADA I R SECONDED. Rol 1 C a l l
There were no objections, the motion carried.
CID. NO. 456
I N I I'.)DUCED
00--
BIB]
39576-U01
1966-U02
07-U02
06-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116938-U03
DO117004-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/7/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1966 07 06 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 1 ÉÍ«I
Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council
City Attorney Flandrick presented Ordinance No. 460
stating this was placed before the Council at the
request of the Chief of Police; that If adopted the
only change in the first subparagraph, subparagraph a,
was that it relates only to any pool room billiard hall
which was open to the public; that those places in
the absence of a permit issued by this Council would
be closed from 2:00 a.m. to 6:00 a.m.; that the other
provision, subparagraph c, would allow Council to
grant a permit upon application by an individual
who desired to run a twenty-four 24) hour operation.
ORDINANCE NO. 460 AMENDING SECTION
4243 OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL
CODE RELATING TO BILLIARD AND POOL
ROOM FACILITIES
COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT FURTHER READING OF
ORDINANCE NO. 460 BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN ADAIR
SECONDED. There were no objections, the motion
carried.
COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 460 BE
INTRODUCED. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. Roll Call,
There were no objections, the motion carried.
00-
City Attorney Flandrick presented a proposed agreement
between the City and Mr. Homer Howard Benson with
reference to the dedication of portions of Grace
Avenue and Adour Lane; that this agreement in principle
had been approved by the Council at a prior meeting;
that it permitted the encroachment some two 2) feet
of the existing residential structure adjacent to
Adour Lane into the right-of-way; that that license as
such would terminate upon destruction of the building
or the passage of twenty-five 25) years; that approval
was recommended. He further stated the agreement also
included the construction of street improvements on
Adour Lane and Grace Avenue.
COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT THE AGREEMENT BE
APPROVED. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. Roll Call,
There were no objections, the motion carried.
COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK
BE AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE SAID AGREEMENT ON BEHALF
OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED.
Roll Call. There were no objections, the motion carried.
00-
City Attorney Flandrick stated that Chief of Police
Adams had advised him that Officer McNulty had submitted
his resignation; that the City had entered into an agree-
ment with Officer McNulty concerning the use of a Police
Dog owned by Officer McNulty; that the agreement was, in
essence, that the City would. purchase the dog from Officer
McNulty for the sum of $1.00 and at such time as he was
terminated or resigned that he would have the option to
repurchase the dog for the same amount; that Officer
McNulty had indicated his desire to exercise this option;
Continued)
July 6, 1966
Page 3
ORD. NO, 460
AMEND. SECTION
4243 OF B.PK,
MUN. CODE RE
BILLIARD AND
POOL ROOM FACILITIES
FURTHER READING OF
ORD. NO. 460
WAIVED
ORD. NO. 460
INTRODUCED
AGREEMENT HOMER
HOWARD BENSON
RE DEDICATION OF
PORTIONS OF GRACE
AVE. AND ADOUR LANE
AGREEMENT APPROVED
AGREEMENT AUTH.
TO BE EXECUTED BY
MAYOR AND CITY CLERK
RE OFFICER MCNULTY'S
RESIGNATION
C 508)
BIB]
39576-U01
1966-U02
07-U02
06-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116938-U03
DO117004-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/7/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1966 07 06 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 1 ÉÍ«299
Reguiir Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council July 6, 1966
Page 4
that is was recommended that the Mayor and City Clerk
be autnor ized to execute a Bill of Sale to Officer
McNulf`r' for the Police Dog Shane) for the sum of $1.00.
As there were no objections, Mayor pro tem Morehead
instructed that the Chief Administrative officer or the
Chief of Police write Mr. McNulty a letter of commenda-
tion for services rendered in the use of the dog.
C OUN' UAAN ADA I R MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNC I L AUTHORIZE MAYOR AND CITY CLER
RHE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE A BILL OF SALE TO AUTH. TO EXECUTE BI
OFFICER MCNULTY FOR THE DOG AS DESCRIBED IN THE OCTOBER OF SALE TO OFFICER
1964, AGREEMENT, FOR THE COMPENSATION IN THE SLW OF MCNULTY FOR DOG AS
$1,00. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY SECONDED. Roll Call. There DESCRIBED IN OCT. 7,
were no objections, the motion carried. 1964, AGREEMENT, FOR
COMPENSATION IN SUM
OF $1.00
00-
Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated the Council CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
had before them in agreement patterned after the one executed AGREEMENT 196667
last year between the City of Baldwin Park and the Chamber
of Commerce; that if approved the first quarterly payment
would be due in August.
Councilwoman Gregory suggested that the agreement beheld
over.
As there were no objections, Mayor pro tea Morehead HELD OVER TO NEXT
stated this item would be held over until the next REG. MTG., JULY 20,
regular meeting. 1966
00-
Chief Administrative Officer Nordby reviewed his report REPORT ON BID OPENING
on the bid opening held June 28, 1966, for three 3) HELD JUNE 28, 1966
compact cars for the Police Department stating the only FOR 3 COMPACT CARS
bidder under the circumstances was Norman King Dodge FOR POLICE DEPT.
of Glendon; that if there was deferred action on this
item the City might not be able to replace the existing
Detective Units until November or December; that they
were specially built models with extra heavy suspension
d other police items; that the cars the City presently
had were 1963 Studebakers; that the Studebekers were in
bad shape and ma ntenance costs were going up; that it
was recommended that the bid be awarded to Norman King
Dodge of Gierdora.
COUNCI L.40,N AD.A I R MOVED TH< T THE CITY COUNC I L ACCEPT
HE:SE CARS. TO AWARD THE BID TO NORMAN KING DODGE
OF GLENDORA FOR THE TOTAL SUM OF $6,092.89)
Councilwoman Gregory asked for an explanalj[on concerning
the air conditioning.
Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated-this was a
second suggestion that the cars could be equipped with
air conditioning at the cost of $240.00 per unit; that
his first recommendation was only for the basic units.
Counci lDman Gregory commented that the report indicated
the over expenditure for the air conditioning units
would be offset by a deferral in the hiring of the
newly authorized personnel for the Police Department.
She stated the Council had asked in the post to have
some study made as to whether the City would benefit
by leasing cars.
Continued)
MOTION MADE
BIB]
39576-U01
1966-U02
07-U02
06-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116938-U03
DO117004-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/7/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1966 07 06 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 1 ÉÍ«2995
Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council
Chief Administrative.Officer Nordby stated that the
International City Managers Association had made very
cromprehensive studies on the leasing of all types of
equipment; that actually there was very little d i f feren e
as for as economics was concerned between leasing and
purchasing; that he could make the Information Immediately
available.
Councllwomin Gregory stated that possibly one other source
of Information that could be researched would be Los
Angeles County.
Chief of Police Adams stated he had checked with the
Oldsmobile dealer mentioned by Councilwoman Gregory and
the adjoinin city that was fortunate to get the lease,
plan at $.06& a mite; that the owner of the agency
indicated he would not lease the cars to Baldwin Park
or any city at toss than $.08 a mile; that he would
charge $.07j for compact cars; that the City could
not coma close to the price bid with a company offering
the lease plan.
COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY SECONDED, Councilman Adair's motion,
Roll Call. There were no objections, the motion carried.
Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated the price
of the air conditioners per unit was $240.00; that
while it was true many people did not have air condT••
ti®ning units In their personal cars a policeman
makes his'Tiviihood in them; that his recommendation
was to acquire the units and make up the deficit in
the appropriation through deferment of hiring; that
one of the policemen now on the force must go into
miii•tary service during the course of this year for
a six month period; that he would be entitled to his
position when he returned and in this one item alone
would be sufficient savings to pick up the deficit,
In answer to a question by Councilwoman Gregory con-
corning bucket a oats, Chief of Police Adams stated that with
the bucket soots there..was more flexibility in getting
In and out of cars In a hurryi when It was required to
have two policeman of different heights riding together;
that unfortunatel the vehicles being purchased for the
Detective Units did not have bucket soots; that bids
had notbeen'dis:guoIIfled because they did not bid
bucket seats.
Councilman Morehead stated that It was his understanding
that vehicles were, worth $100.00 more on a trade In
if they had air conditioning units.
COUNC I LM N ADA I R AMD THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZE
TOE PURCHASE OF THREE 3) AIR CONDITIONING UNITS-AT
THE COST OF $240.00 A PIECE. COUNC iLWONAN GREGORY
SECONDED. Roil Call. There ware no objections, the
motion carr i eel.
City Clark Balkas administered the oath to these'in the
audience desiring to be heard during the meeting.
July 6, 1966
Page a
MOTION CARRIED THAT
CITY CO(NC I L ACCEPT
CARS TO AWARD B ID
TO NORMAN 9 I NG DODGE
OF GLENDORA FOR TOTAL
SUM OF $6,092,09)
PURCHASE OF 3 AIR
CONDITIONING UNITS
AT COST-OF $240
A PIECE AUTN,6
OATH ADMINISTERED
BIB]
39576-U01
1966-U02
07-U02
06-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116938-U03
DO117004-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/7/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1966 07 06 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 1 ÉÍ«299f
Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council July 6, 1966
Page 6
As there were no objections, Mayor pro tem Morehead HEARING LACFC V-I
announced that on the advice of the City Attorney TRI-CITY GOLDEN AGE,
the Council would proceed with Item No. 3 under the CONVALESCENT HOME,
Chief Administrative Officer, LACFC V-I, 14475 Ituni 14475 iTt1NI ST.
Street, Tri-City Golden Age Convalescent Home, as
there was an on duty Fireman present who would be
testifying regarding this case.
City Attorney Flandrick stated Mr. John Revis, Attorney
for the applicant, was present; that the Council had
before them copies of the letter from Mr. Revis dated
June 21, 1966 and a letter directed to Mr. Revis from
the Southwest Fire Protection Company dated June 14,
1966,
Mr. John T. Revis, 18758 East Milton Drive, Glendora, JOHN T. REVIS,
stated he represented Golden Age Convalescent Home; 18758 E. Milton Dr.,
a corporation dealing solely in this sort of an Glendora
institutional type of an industry; that Im1961 they
had built the 49 bed facility as they had done In
several cities in Southern California; that last
year when medicare became very apparent as a Public
Law they'received communications from the government
asking them to do everything they could to expand
their facilities; that they did just exactly that;
that they had submitted plans to the City in December
and of course, all of their plans had to go through
the State Department of Hospitals; that their architects
were notified because of the addition being away from
the street and it being a larger size they had to have
in on site hydrant and a sprinkler system, etc, for
1500 gallons per minute pressure on the line; that
they had included this in their plans and had built
accordingly; that the plans were submitted and a
Building Permit was obtained from the City and they
had borrowed $180,000.00 for the addition; that it
was built and just about ready to open up; that about
one month ago the Fire Inspector was around and
although they had built to handle the 1500 g.p.m.
there was no place they could hook up to the line;
that the main in the street only supplied 540 g.p.m.;
that they checked back with their engineers and found
with the type of structure they had there was no
danger of fire hazard; that they were classified
as being very light hazard; that the authorities
would show that their system would work very well
on the 540 g.p,m. which was available; that
unfortunately, however, the Fire Inspector said
that the Code stated that they had to have 1500
g.p,m. pressure and they did not have it and could
not get the City approval on the Building Permit
without which they could not operate; that they
asked that the Council favorably consider their
request for a variance.
Councilman Morehead asked if he understood correctly
that at the time the plans were drawn and submitted that
the company was aware of the fact that they would be
required to furnish 1500 g.p.m.
Revis stated not the company, the architects were;
that they picked this up from the requirements of the
City Code; that they put this on the plan that the
Building Department approved and issued a permit.
Continued)
BIB]
39576-U01
1966-U02
07-U02
06-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116938-U03
DO117004-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/7/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1966 07 06 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 1 ÉÍ«2997
Regular Meeting of the B&ldwln Park City Council July 6, 1966
Page 7
I
Councilmen Morehead questioned whether the company was
aware of the fact that 1500 g.p.m. was required for the
Installation.
Mr. Revis stated so far as the plans were concerned; that
they assumed this was available at the street because their
plans showed they would hook up to the males in the street;
that he was not trying to cast reflection on anyone but
he had handled several water cases of this nature and
invariably the city building departments would not grant
permits unless the facilities were somewhere ava i t ab l e
or unless the applicant could show where he was going
to get i t; that when the permit came back and indicated
this they assumed the water was at the line in the street;
that the water company stated they had no obligation, and
legally he did not think they did, to up" their capacity
down that street; that any time a larger main was put
through there they would be happy to hook up and would
expect to pay their shire of the cost; that he understood
they could run a line under the freeway and get water
from somewhere on the north side but they did not have
the money to do this.
City Attorney Fiandrick asked if he understood that the
facilities actually constructed insofar as the interior
portion of the building was concerned would have a
capacity of the 1500 g.p.m.; w s it merely the source
they were concerned with?
Mr. Revis stated yes; that they had a six 16) inch line
capable of handling the pressure; that they had the
on site fire hydrant res.air'ed and a sprinkler system
to handle the pressure but they d?d not have the eater.
Councilman Morehead asked, in order to get the water,
would Mr. Revis" company be required to pay the entire
cost of installation.
Mr. Revis stated this was his understanding, not just the
installation but bringing in the line.
A
Chief Parsons, Los Angeles County Fire Department, stated CHIEF PARSONS,
he was waiting for their Fire Rating Analyst to arrive LOS ANGELES COUNTY
who has had the expert knowledge on the requirements of FIRE DEPT'.
the Board of Underwriters of the American Insurance Associa-
tion; that the purpose of the Fire Department was to prevent
loss of life and property due to fire; that in this line it
was the duty of the Fire Chief to be professionally aware
of the standards and re~juirements to provide adequate fire
protection; that it was the Fire Depar°ttment's responsibility
to provide the highest level of lire protection as consistent
with economic factors such s assessed vca:luaation and the fire
situation; that these levels of prote; i ion were stated in the
grading schedule of theft ioa:ai Board of Fire Underwiters,
know as the Americ-a:, sur ce Associ~ t ion; that the City
of Baldwin Park now hnd rating in most areas of Class 5
on a scale from I to 10; that the duelling class rate was
Class 4 which was quite a good rating; that in their denart-
ment some areas had a Class 3 overall rating and this was
the rating that they were shooting for In Baldwin Park; that
in order to come up with a rating like this the deficiency
points for the various parts of the grading system had to
be reduced to the point where the City would meet this
rating; that the most critical factor in fire protection
was the water system; that the water need was determined
Continued)
BIB]
39576-U01
1966-U02
07-U02
06-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116938-U03
DO117004-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/7/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1966 07 06 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 1 ÉÍ«2998
Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council July 6, 1966
Page 8
by the size of the buildings Involved; that the water
system would have to be Improved to better the grade;
that the lower the grading level the lower the Insurance
rates; that when a City was called for regrading it would
not necessarily get an Improved grading; that there were
many cases where cities thought their protection facilities
had improved to sere they would get a better rating but on
examination by the rating bureau of the underwriters It
turned out that the developments In the city had not kept
up with Improving in a way they should and their rating
and insurance rates went up; that the danger they saw
in compromising or granting relief to a situation where
a certain water supply was required was that when future
gredings were requested the City would be directly
effected and the deficiency points would be such that
the grading would be adversely affected; that they realized
that in some cases there was quite a hardship but to allow
permanent and frequent variations could hurt the rating
for the City; that the City Council had the responsibility
and the final determination on the'level of fire protection
provided; that the Fire Department would be remiss in their
duty if they did not state what the requirements were for
a high level of fire protection; that Captain Rotella
could give expert testimony on the requirements for fire
flows and so on; that he understood in this case the
convalescent home was fully aware of the fact that there
was not this volume of water available in the street
when they started building; that 500 g.p.m. would handle
the sprinkler system in the building but what could be
done with 540 gallons when the fire department was hooked
up to the hydrant in the street and drawing out most all
of the water before it got to the convalescent home for
fire pr•otectlon services.
Mayor pro tern Morehead stated the records showed that the
first Installation was constructed In 1961. He asked
what fire protection was available to the Golden Age
Convalescent Home at that time or prior to this expansion.
Chief Parsons stated as far as protection from the fire
department there had been just as good a level of fire
protection as there was now; that the water supply was
the problem; that apparently the four 4) inch main
had been in the ground there for some time.
Mayor pro tern Morehead stated if the additional pipe size
was not required in 1961 for the"49beds Why was It
required now or why was the fire department just now
pointing out that there should be 1500 g.p.m.
Captain Rotella, Los Angeles Couirlty Fire Department,
stated the Fire Code under which this particular build-
ing became involved was adopted by the County in
rebruary 1961; that it would probably be found that
this building was built prior to; the adoption of the
ordinance by the City; that at the time the first unit
was built the State did not require automatic fire
sprinklers.
Mr. Revis stated there was a statement made that directly
challenged the integrity of the company and himself;
that he had testified and was willing to take the oath.
City Clerk Balkus administered the Oath. OATH ADMINISTERED
Continued)
BIB]
39576-U01
1966-U02
07-U02
06-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116938-U03
DO117004-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/7/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1966 07 06 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 1 É Í«29994,
Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council July 6, 1966
Page 9
Captain Rotella stated that the Ordinance involved
was adopted in 1961 in January or February.
Mr. Revis stated that they were not coming In as a
subdivider trying to make a profit; that he was speaking
on behalf of the corporation In stating that the offi-
cials did not know when they borrowed the money and
proceeded with the construction based on the permit
from the City that there would not be water available;
that he would like to make it very clear under oath
that not a one of the officials was aware of this
because they would have not have invested this kind
of money and faced this kind of a problem.
City Clerk Baalkus again administered the Oath, OATH ADMINISTERED
City Attorney Flendrick stated that the testimony so
for had indicated that there was a Code requirement
for 1500 g.p.m, water pressure and asked If this was
available to this particular location and if it was
how close was it and what would the approximate
cost be to hook up to It.
Mr. R. H. Nicholson, Jr., Vice President, San Gabriel
Valley Water Company, stated it was not available In
the mains adjacent to the project but it was available
1200 feet away; that it would cost over $10,000.00 to
get the flow there.
City Attorney Flandrick asked who would pay this cost.
Mr. Nicholson stated It would be paid for by the owner
of the property.
Captain Rotelle stated part of his responsibility was
reviewing the building plans and establishing fire
flow and fire hydrant requirements based on their
experience, professional Judgment, and standards;
that the architect had noted on the plans the standards
for the flow requirement and the hydrant requirement;
that they naturally would assume that any architect
would Inform their client what the recolrements were
before he put the notes on the plan because as he under-
stood It anything on the plans became a permit require•-
Mont,
Mr•. Revis stated they were on the plans but as a practical
matter he wanted to point out that they submitted the plans
for approval to the State aAd the Building Department;
that the plans only show the hook up up to the street;
that they naturally ssumed there would not be a require-
ment there for this type of pressure unless the water was
avelleble$ that they hid to reason to believe that this
wasn't there or that it would not be called to their
attention by the Building Department; that this had to
be done before they ever spent a dollar in construction
Work and before they acquired the money; that i t was not
called to their attention; that they had a six Inch line
and nothing to hook up to; that 1961 was a very famous
year for the Los Angeles County Fire Department; the
year of the big fire; that there was some talk up in the
hills about water pressure dropping because wh* the
mains were opened in one street the mains were not
putting out pressure on other streets; that this County
Code must apply to the entire County to the higher
fire hazard areas as well as to the lower fire hazard
Continued)
R.H. NICHOLSON, JR.,
VICE PRES., SAN OA$RIEL
VALLEY WATER CO.
BIB]
39576-U01
1966-U02
07-U02
06-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116938-U03
DO117004-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/7/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1966 07 06 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 1 É
Í«3000
Regu] r Meet in
the E i d r i' x< C a-y Counc i 1
s; th t ne r x U p; the cost of hooking up i f
R
t h w they felt they were Justified
tr9@ z't: Pig S r
in asking for this vari Once.
Councilwoman Gregory asked what a pump did in the event
of lack of wtter pressure wherein Chief Parsons stated
that she r e.. r°emert set for building was 1500 g.p.m,
with a twenty 120) pound residual, or twenty pounds of
pressure left n the 6 rtes; that in order for the fire
engine to push the im!ter in sufficient quantities
through the fire hoses It had to use a pump for pressure;
that the fire engines could pump 1250 g.p.m.; that the
purpose of the fire engine was to transfer the water from
the water mains to the fire,
Mayor pro tem Morehead asked Fire Chief Parsons to comment
on the second paragraph of the letter from Southwest Fire
Protection Company dated June 14, 1966.
Chief Parsons stated they had no quarrel that 500 g.p.m.
would supply the sprinkler system in the building but
in looking at the picture of protecting not only the
convalescent home but the entire area, If the fire engine
was pulling 500 g.p.m. out of the main there would not
be water there to go into the sprinkler system; that
540 g.p.m. did not meet the standard requirements for
this type of protection situation; that even for a
scattered residential section the requirements of the
Board of Fire Underwriters was a 1,000 g.p.m. with
minimum size water mains of six 6) inch; that they did
not recognize any pipe or main less than six 6) Inches
in diameter, that with any four 4) inch mains they were
assessed deficiency points in grading.
Mayor pro tem Morehead asked what would happen if there
was a fire there and the present water supply was 540 g.p.m.
and If there was 1500 g.p.m. available how would this
affect the system In the convalescent home..
Chief Parsons stated there would be no effect if the
pressure was adequate, however if the pressure was low
they would pressurize the sprinkler system from the fire
engine; that in fact if there was an emergency situation
they would see if there was any way that the water company
could boost the water pressure in the main*to give more
pressure.
He stated It was their res~~~nsibility to point out that
fire protection w s deficient; that If a situation
where there was a l a,.r ge l ose or a loss of i i fe and the
City was aware of it there might be some moral responsibility.
Mayor pro tem Morehead asked whose responsibility would It
be to bring this up to standards.
Chief Parson steted it would be the Council's.
Ntr. Revis said Chief Persons stated it would be customary
In an area like this to have 1000 g.p.m.; that he would
agree with him under his Code but what the Fire Depart-
ment was trying to do in this Instance was to require
one property owner to provide this high standard of
protection that every house in the area did not have;
that the real culpret if there was a euipret had to be
the water company; that by law there was not much the
Continued)
July 6, 1966
Page 10
BIB]
39576-U01
1966-U02
07-U02
06-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116938-U03
DO117004-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/7/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1966 07 06 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 1 ÉÍ«ReguO.ar Meeting of the Baldwln Park City Council July 6, 1966
Page II
I
N
City could do because the Code changed after they were
well established in the City; that they had nine of
these places and in the entire time they had been
operating they had only I fire; that con's ruc- i i tn was
single story concrete slab; that their rooms by Code
had to be where every patient would be within five 5)
feet of a door.
Chief Parsons, sl-: ted V v- Fire Department pointed out
the standards; that it was the City Council's responsibility
tether or not the requirements were complied with.
Captain James Hartfeld, Los Angeles County Fire Department,
stated the building in 1961 was considerably smaller than
it was with the new addition; that this in itself would
necessitate an increase in a required fire flow; that if
the Code had been in effect in 1961 the required fire
glow probably would have been less than the 1500 g.p.m.
because of the size of the building; that their Department
presented e letter dated December 15, 1965 which stated
that a water main must be installed to service the private
on site hydrant with a minimum fire flow of 1500 g.p.m.
at twenty i2O1 pounds residual pressure; that this was submitted to the
Building Department and the convalescent home construction
people; that it sounded like what they had done was to go
ahead and put in everything for 1500 g.p.m. without look-
ing around to see if they had a supply; that normally a
man building a house would not go out where there was no
Edison Company and completely wire his house for electricity.
Revis stated they had had two different architects; one
I
for the first building and one for the second; that he
had never denied that the December 15th letter came through
and that they had it on the plans; that they had built
for i500 g.p,m-; that when they got a permit they assumed
this was the Couofyls requirements and when it was in the
City's Code that the water company servicing the area would
have 1500 gallon mains running down the street.
Mayor pro tem Morehead asked whose responsibility would
V Revis think it was by someone not checking to see
the water was available.
Mr. Revis stated mor H y the only way they could have
told this would have been to go out and dig a hole
in the middle of the street; that they had no reason
to believe that the area was substandard in water; that
he had seen this political maneuver done before, the
CCouc:ty Fire Department said they were trying to raise
standards end he agreed with them but he had also
seen fnem c.a ch indiv du s rtght in the middle of their
po a t c a t p be~.aus h em! i ng the door shut on
someone 1 a ke us'! they try to force some, other
governmen t a J body to take action and it was a very
effective action; that this was what he thought was
unt"air°, if the Building Department had stated the
supp l v, was not a~~. i 1 ab I L they would not have a leg to
stand on but in effect the City had told them come
on in, borrow money, and build, and now they could
not open their doors,,
MAYOR PRO TEM MOREHEAD DECLARED THE HEARING CLOSED. HEARING CLOSED
Councilwoman Gregory questioned whether the area could
be petitioned to bring in water and share the cost;
that City Attorney Flandrick stated that a Fire
District could be formed but she understood that unless
Continued)
0
Ri
BIB]
39576-U01
1966-U02
07-U02
06-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116938-U03
DO117004-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/7/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1966 07 06 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 1 É
1966 07 06 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 1 É
Í«30Oju
i
I
Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council
PUBLIC HEARINGS
It was the time and place fixed for the continuation of
a public hearing on a Short Form 1911 Act for curbs,
gutters and sidewalk on the west side of La Rica Avenue
between Ramona Boulevard and Baldwin Park Boulevard.
City Attorney Flandrick stated there was an additional
recommendation from the Engineering Department suggesting
that the Council overrule the protests providing that the
City construct curbs as opposed to requiring the property
owners on the two protesting parcels to do so.
As there was no testimony in behalf of or in opposition,
Mayor pro tern Morehead declared the public hearing closed.
Assistant City Engineer Fogle explained there was existing
curb there which was not at proper grade and in the proper
location put in to County standards; that it was necessary
to remove this curb and install new curbing in the proper
location and elevation; that it was not legally the
responsibility of the property owner to replace that curb;
but they were responsible for sidewalk and concrete drive
approach; that in front of Mrs. Isabel L. Christie's
property at 3955 La Rica Avenue the sidewalk could go
adjacent to the structure.
July 6, 1966
Page 13
PUBLIC HEARING
SHORT FORM 1911 ACT
CONT'D FROM JUNE 15,
1966) CGS W SIDE LA
RICA AVE. BETWEEN
RAMONA BLVD. AND B.PK.
BLVD. 66-S-17)
PUBLIC HEARING
DECLARED CLOSED
RESOLUTION NO. 66-162 MAKING FINDINGS AND RES. NO. 66-162
OVERRULING PROTESTS AND OBJECTIONS AND MAKING FINDINGS AND
ORDERING THE SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS OF OVERRULING PROTESTS
THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK TO CONSTRUCT AND OBJECTIONS AND
SIDEWALKS AND DRIVEWAY APPROACHES IN ORDERING THE SUPT. OF
ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK STS. OF CITY OF B.PK.
STANDARD PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS CON- TO CONSTRUCT SIDEWALKS
FORMING WITH EXISTING SIDEWALKS AND DRIVEWAY AND DRIVEWAY APPROACHES
APPROACHES CONSTRUCTED UPON THEM FACING IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE WEST SIDE OF LA RICA AVENUE BETWEEN CITY OF B.PK. STAND-
RAMONA BOULEVARD AND BALDWIN PARK BOULEVARD ARD PLANS AND SPECS
CONFORMING WITH EXIST-
ING SIDEWALKS AND
DRIVEWAY APPROACHES
CONSTRUCTED UPON THEM
FACING W SIDE OF LA
RICA AVE. BETWEEN
RAMONA BLVD. AND B.PK.
BLVD.
COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 66-162 RES. NO. 66-162
BE ADOPTED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN ADOPTED
ADAIR SECONDED. Roll Call. There were no objections,
the motion carried.
00-
It was the time and place fixed for the continuation of PUBLIC HEARING
a public hearing on N-30, to determine whether certain
premises, and buildings and structures constitute a N-30, CONTINUED
public nuisance at 3139 Marlinda Avenue. FROM MAY 4, 1966)
3139 Marlinda Ave.
City Attorney Flandrick stated he had had a conference
with the property owner, Mr. Fanders, prior to the
meeting; that Mr. Fanders had agreed that the premises
and property constituted a nuisance and that.he agreed
ith the staff recommendation that the nuisance be
Continued)
BIB]
39576-U01
1966-U02
07-U02
06-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116938-U03
DO117004-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/7/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1966 07 06 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 1 ÉÍ«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council
abated within 60 days.
Mr. A. L. Fenders, 3139 N. Marlinda, Baldwin Park, con-
firmed the City Attorney's statement and agreed to abate
the nuisance within 60 days.
As there was no further testimony, Mayor pro tem More-
head declared the public hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 66-178 FINDING
AND DETERMINING THE EXISTENCE
OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING
THE SAME ABATED N-30)
July 6, 1966
Page 14
A. L. FANDERS,
3139 N. Marlinda,
B.Pk.
PUBLIC HEARING
DECLARED CLOSED
N-30
RES. NO. 66-178
FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THE EXISTENC
OF A PUBLIC NUISANCL
AND ORDERING THE
SAME ABATED N-30)
60 DAYS TO ABATE
COUNCILMAN ADAIR MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 66-178 BE
ADOPTED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILWOMAN
GREGORY SECONDED. Roll Call. There were no objections,
the motion carried.
00-
It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing
on-CP-77, an appeal from decision of Board of Zoning
Adjustments, an sppiication submitted by L. Richey,
for s Conditional! Use Permit pursuant to the Baldwin
Park City Council Resolution No. 64-187, to allow
the construction and maintenance of a dog kennel upon
a parcel of land located at 5111 Bleecker Street, in
the M-I light manufacturing) Zone.
Proper publication, postings and mailings had been
accomplished.
City Attorney Flandrick stated there was a letter on
this matter from the attorney for the apparent owner
of the property; that they apparently do not wish this
permit to be granted; that he suggested that the Council
continue this matter to the next regular meeting so that
the position of the owner could be clarified.
COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT CP-.77 BE HELD OVER TO
THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING JULY 20, 1966). COUNCILMAN
ADAIR SECONDED. Roll Call. There were no objections,
the motion carried,
00-
It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing
on ZV-158, an appeal from decision of Board of Zoning
Adjustments, an application submitted by Roccie
Schavoni, for a Zone Variance to vary with the Baldwin
Park Zoning Ordinance No. 357, Section 9611, subsection
A..(3), to develop less than an acre of land in the
C--2-A heavy commercial, I acre minimum) Zone, upon
a parcel of land located at 3090 Maine Avenue.
Continued)
RES. NO. 66-178
ADOPTED
CP-77, APPEAL FROM
DECISION OF BZA
REQUEST TO ALLOW
CONSTRUCTION AND
MAINTENANCE OF DOG
KENNEL AT 5111
BLEECKER ST., IN M-1
ZONE, L. RICHEY
PUBLICATION, POSTINGS,
MAILINGS
LETTER FROM ATTY.
FOR OY!>NER RE NOT
WISHING PERMIT TO
BE GRANTED
HELD OVER TO JULY 20,
1966
PUBLIC HEARING
ZV-158, REQUEST
TO VARY WITH B.PK.
ZONING ORD. NO. 357,
SECTION 9611, SUB-
SECTION A-(3), TO
DEVELOP LESS THAN AN
ACRE OF LAND IN C-2-A
HEAVY COMMERCIAL,
I ACRE M I N IMF) ZONE
AT 3090 MAINE AVE.,
ROCCIE SCHAVONI
BIB]
39576-U01
1966-U02
07-U02
06-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116938-U03
DO117004-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/7/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1966 07 06 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 1 ÉÍ«300Sr
Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council July 6, 1966
Page 15
Proper publication, postings and mailings had been PUBLICATION, POSTINGS,
accomplished. MAILINGS
Planning Director Chivetta presented a resume stating RESUME
the Board of Zoning Adjustments had adopted Resolution
No. BZA 6625 on June 8, 1966, approving the request.
He pointed out the map on the wall showing the plot plan
approved by the Board of Zoning Adjustments. He stated
it was the staff recommendation the Council concur
with the Board of Zoning Adjustments.
TESTIMONY IN BEHALF OF THE REQUEST WAS CALLED FOR BY TESTIMONY IN BEHALF
MAYOR PRO TEM MOREHEAD.
W R. J. Schavoni, 12012 Lower Azusa Road, El Monte, R. J. SCHAVONI,
stated he was purchasing the property; that the Administrator" 12012 Lower Azusa
stated that the gentleman who owned the adjacent property Rd., El Monte
who proposed a building as of last September wanted to
exercise his proposal; that they gave him six 6) months
to make improvements on the piece that he was intending
to purchase; that he did not know whether he had made
any improvements or not on his; that it did not look
like it.
Planning Director Chivetta stated there was a case,
ZV®127, that was active; that he had exercised the
conditions of the resolution by raising the structure and
clearing the land in preparation for construction; that
he was waiting the outcome of this hearing before pro-
ceeding,
City Attorney Flandrick stated one of the conditions of
approval by the Board in granting the variance was that
all buildings and structures be removed or destroyed;
that he had done this and therefore had exercised rights
under the variance and therefore it was a valid variance;
that it could not be terminated as such except by public
hearing.
Mr. David Gilman, 9040 East Huntington Drive, San Gabriel, DAVID GILMAN,
stated he had handled this potential sale for Mr. Schavoni; 9040 E. Huntington
that Mr. Schavoni was not acquiring the property for Dr., San Gabriel
speculative purposes.
TESTIMONY IN OPPOSITION TO THE REQUEST WAS CALLED FOR BY TESTIMONY IN
MAYOR PRO TEM MOREHEAD. OPPOSITION
Mrs. Benefel, 3077 North Maine, Baldwin Park, stated she, MRS. BENEFEL,
was against this drivein; that down the street toward 3077 N. Maine, B,Pk.
the freeway there was ban in and out hamburg(Zr- place;
that up the other way was an ice cream drive«in; that she
fekt this would be another 3mal G development; that there
were twenty some acres that could be put to very good
use as a big development which she thought would help
the City of Baldwin Park; that the City had all of the
small developments it needed.
In rebuttal Mr. Scha,~voni stated he thought he had the same
right as a big businessman,
TESTIMONY IN BEHALF OF THE REQUEST WAS, CALLED FOR BY TESTIMONY IN BEHALF
MAYOR PRO TEM MOREHEAD.
Mr. Venagone, 1343 Highland Oaks Drive, Arcadia, stated MR. VENAGONE,
he had an interest in the project; that they would develop 1343 Highland Oaks
immediately, Dr., Arcadia
Continued)
BIB]
39576-U01
1966-U02
07-U02
06-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116938-U03
DO117004-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/7/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1966 07 06 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 1 ÉÍ«3'
Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council July 6, 1966
Page 16
TESTIMONY IN OPPOSITION TO THE REQUEST WAS CALLED FOR BY TESTIMONY IN
MAYOR PRO TEM MOREHEAD. OPPOSITION
Mrs. Benefel stated she did not state she was for or against
any size businessman; that she was for the City of Baldwin
Park.
As there was no one else in the audience desiring to speak PUBLIC HEARING
either in behalf of or in opposition to ZV-158, Mayor pro DECLARED CLOSED
tem Morehead declared the public hearing closed. ZV-158
Councilwoman Gregory stated she realized the Council had
appealed the decision of the Board of Zoning Adjustments;
that this was to reaffirm the work of the Planning Commission
in setting out the C-2-A property in this area and to stop
the infringment of the cutting up of this property into small
parcels; that she did not realize at that time that this was
a corner property; that certainly when a large concern came
Into an area there was always the corner that became a
service station or something else; that in stopping this
development she wondered if it would have any noticeable
affect on the rest of the property; that because it was a
corner lot she thought perhaps the Council should not
disallow this application, but she certainly thought in
view of the other properties Involved in the C-2-A zone
that some consideration should be given to maintain It for
larger development that might come In.
Councilman Morehead stated it was also his understanding
that there was no other variance in this area that was
active.
in answer to a question by Councilman Morehead, Planning
Director Chivetta stated the entire area now zoned C-2-A
had been referred to the Planning Commission for study;
that there would be a public hearing on this matter before
the Planning Commission on July 27, 1966. MAYOR PRO TEM
MOREHEAD MOVED THAT ZV-158 BE HELD UNTIL THE COUNCIL HEARD
FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION REGARDING C-2-A ZONING)
Further discussion followed.
Councilwoman Gregory asked, legally what did the City owe
the applicants From ZV-127 and ZV-l58)
City Attorney Flandrick stated the action of the Board with
respect to this particular case was vacated by reason of
the appeal; that the final decision would have to be made
by the City Council; that it was his understanding the
applicant had exercised rights under ZV-127 and it was a
valid variance.
Further discussion followed wherein City Attorney Flandrick
stated this matter could be held under submission for any
reasonable length of time.
COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. Roll call, there were no MOTION CARRIED THAT
objections, the motion carried. ZV-158 BE HELD UNTIL
COUNCIL HEARD FROM
P.C. RE C-2 A ZONING)
00-
BIB]
39576-U01
1966-U02
07-U02
06-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116938-U03
DO117004-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/7/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1966 07 06 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 1 ÉÍ«3001
I
Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council
It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on
SP-2, proposed Street Name Change, Walnut Place, located
on the west side of Walnut Street north of Los Angeles
Street and south of Olive Street, to be renamed Benwood
Street.
Proper publication, postings and mailings had been
accomplished.
Planning Director Chivetta presented a resume stating
it was the staff recommendation that the Council concur
with the Planning Coimission's recommendation that Walnut
Place be renamed Benwood Street.
TESTIMONY IN BEHALF OF THE STREET NAME CHANGE WAS CALLED
FOR BY MAYOR PRO TEJM MOREHEAD.
Mr. Gus Nesseth, 14539 North Center, Baldwin Park, asked
if the people in Tract No. 23550 had been notified of
the street name change.
Planning Director Chivetta stated there had been proper
notification as required by State law.
Mr. Nesseth stated they were the builders and had no
objection to the street name change.
As there was no one else in the audience desiring to
speak either in behalf of or in opposition,to SP-2 Mayor pro
tem Morehead declared the public hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 66-i79 RENAMING
WALNUT PLACE TO BENW00D STREET
CASE NO. SP-2)
COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 66-179
BE ADOPTED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN
ADAIR SECONDED. Roll call, there were no objections,
so ordered.
In answer to a question by Mayor pro tem Morehead, City
Attorney Flandrlck stated the change would take effect
immediately, however a time limitation, possibly six
mcnths, could be put on it,
00-
It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on
SP-j, amendment to the compreheri ive General Plan,
Community Design Study., for the City of Baldwin Park.
Street circulation for the block bounded on the south
by Los Angeles Street, on the west by Walnut Street,
on the north by Olive Street and on the east by Merced
Avenue
July 6, 1966
Page 17
PUBLIC HEARING
SP-2
STREET NAME CHANGE
WALNUT PLACE TO
BENWOOD STREET
PUBLICATION,
POSTINGS, MAILINGS
RESUME
TESTIMONY IN BEHALF
GUS NESSETH,
14539 N. Center,
B.Pk.
PUBLIC HEARING
DECLARED CLOSED
RES. NO. 66-179
RES. NO. 66-179
ADOPTED
SP 3,
AMENDMENT TO
COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL
PLAN, CCMMINITY DESIGN
STUDY
STREET CIRr.ULATION
FOR BLOCK BOUNDED ON
SOUTH BY L.A. ST.,
ON WEST BY WALNUT ST.
ON NORTH BY OLIVE ST.
AND ON EAST BY MERCED
AVE.
Proper publication, postings and mailings had been
accomplished.
Continued)
PUBLICATION,
POSTINGS, MAILINGS
BIB]
39576-U01
1966-U02
07-U02
06-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116938-U03
DO117004-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/7/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1966 07 06 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 1 ÉÍ«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council July 6, 1966
Page 18
Planning Director Chivetta presented a resume stating it
was the staff recommendation that the Council concur with
the Planning Commission's recommendation and adopt the
proposed amendment.
TESTIMONY IN OPPOSITION WAS CALLED FOR BY MAYOR PRO TEM TESTIMONY IN OPPOSITION
MOREHEAD.
Mr. Ted Riggs, 19560 Navilla Place, Covina, stated he TED RIGGS,
owned property at i453 North Merced, Baldwin Park; that 19560 Navilla PI.,
the rear of his property would be the west side of the Covina
proposed cul-de-sac; that he was in opposition or
possibly he misunderstood; that he was concerned about
the existing water meters and lines on the rear of the
property and who would be required to pay for the
relocation of these.
City Attorney Flandrick stated there would be no change
in the street pattern, that this was merely an amendment
to the Master Plan; that nothing would take place until
such time as there was a redevelopment of that area or
an assessment district initiated by the property owners
or if the Council wished to expend General Funds some
time in the future pro put the street through; that there
was no change, as such, physically required or made
necessary by reason of this amendment.
Mr. Riggs stated If ultimately the property owners were
going to be liable he would be very strongly opposed
whereas if the City were to take title to this property
and assume any liability for any damage claim this was
different. He stated he could not see the reason for
the cul-de-sac and asked why they did not run a 60 foot
street straight through to Los Angeles Street.
Assistant City Engineer Fogle stated the street that
came out onto Merced was adequate to carry traffic only
for the houses that front on it; that to extend this
street would mean destroying at least one house and
possibly two; that this had been a matter under study.
Mr. Shelby Walter, 1583 North Merced, Baldwin Park, SHELBY WALTER,
questioned the present Master Plan and the proposed 4583 N. Merced,
change. B.Pk.
Extensive discussion, followed wherein Mr. Walter stated
he owned Lot L1.03; that he could not get a lot split
approved; that if was undedicated street and he was
told it could not be deli ated because the original
opening off of Merced Averue was not wide enough to fit
the standards of the City bt thn pressen t time. He
asked if he wanted to get s lot i:pl't would he have
to develop from the origir i opening at Merced Avenue.
City Attorney Flandrick stated this would have to be
discussed with the City Engineer; that he could state
that lot splits had been permitted in the past in this
and other areas where the property owner had dedicated
that portion of the property required for the street from
his property and either improved or placed a deposit to
cover the cost of such improvements.
Continued)
BIB]
39576-U01
1966-U02
07-U02
06-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116938-U03
DO117004-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/7/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1966 07 06 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 1 ÉÍ«I
I
R guiarr Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council
A:s here was, no one else in the audience desiring to speak
ether in behalf of or in opposition to SP-3, Mayor pro
tem Morehead declared the public hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO0 66-180 APPROVING AN
AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN
CCCRCULATION PLAN ELEMENT CASE NO.
SF=,3)
CODUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 66-180 BE
ADOPTED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD
S'ECONDED., Roil caIG there were no objections, so ordered.
00-
AT' 9 45 P.M. MAYOR PRO TENS MOREHEAD MOVED THAT THE CITY
COUNCiL RECESS FOR TEN MINUTESO The motion died for lack
of a second.
00-
t was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on
SP-4, amendment to the comprehensive General Plan, Ccmrnun i ty
Design Study, for the City of Baldwin Park, Street'circulation
for the block beunde d on the north by Ramona Boulevard, on the
south by Salisbury Street., on the west by Barnes Avenue and
on the east by Rhodes Lane,
Proper pub J i cati on, postings and mailings had been accom-
p1ished
Planning Director Chivetta presented a resume stating It
was the staff recommendation that the Council concur with
the P l annd ng Commission°s recommendation and adopt Block
Study D which would give the City the ultimate in circulation
for the area at some future date when development is
coqtemp i ated by i nd i v dui; l property owners or as a co-op
ven t uure o
TESTIMONY IN OPPOI<i~ vll h`"v F-4 WA;: CALLED FOR 6Y MAYOR
PRO T EM MOREi-~EAD,
Mr. Jam Rodir.e, 5327 N. Peck Road, El MMonte, stated he
o-ay, repre.sentr"ng John Ce sal to at 12860 Ramona Boulevard;
that he wa in favor of 6,11:::k udy 0 wi ih reservations;
that the al ley took too muc' from the properties that
front on R mona. He passed to the Council a copy of
B to k Studd' 0 whi h he had red i ined for the Counci l as
consideration. He further stated he believed the alley
was, designed as a buffer between the properties on
Ramona Boulevard and the residential properties to the
south,- that he thought a masonry wall and a sixty 60)
foot width of street B would serve the same purpose.
Continued)
July 6, 1966
Page 19
PUBLIC HEARING
DECLARED CLOSED
SP 3
RES. NO. 66-180
RES. NO. 66-180
ADOPTED
MOTION MADE
MOTION DIED FOR
LACK OF SECOND
PUBLIC HEARING
SP 4
AMENDMENT TO
COMPREHEFSIVE GENERAL
PLAN, COMMUNITY DESIGN
STUDY
STREET CIRCULATION
FOR BLOCK BOUNDED ON
NORTH BY RAMONA BLVD.,
ON SOUTH BY SALISBURY
ST., ON WEST BY BARNES
AVE. AND ON EAST BY
RHODES LANE
PUBLICATION,
POSTINGS, MAILINGS
RESUME
TESTIMONY IN OPPOSITION
JIM RODINE,
5327 N. Peck Rd.
E l Monte
BIB]
39576-U01
1966-U02
07-U02
06-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116938-U03
DO117004-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/7/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1966 07 06 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 1 ÉÍ«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council
Mr. James Rogers, 12875 Salisbury, rear, Baldwin Park,
stated he was not actually in opposition to the plan
other than what it would do to his property; that he
was told Street B" would come in behind him and would
take twenty 20) feet of his property; that this would
leave nineteen 19) feet from the house to the property
line; that the way they stated the lots would be it
would take thirty 30) feet of his property; that this
would give him nine 9) feet from the house to the
property line.
City Attorney Flandrick stated the plan would not affect
Mr. Rogers in any way; that if there would be a portion
of Mr. Roger's property taken for a street It would not
affect Mr. Rogers so that he would have to rebuild; that
the sixty 60) foot overall right-of-way on Street 8"
would be including sidewalks, parkways and so forth
forty 40) feet curb face to curb face.
Mr. Kirk Daniel, 12867 Salisbury, Baldwin Park,
stated he had a City map that showed the first lot
as 125 feet, 105 feet in the back, street 60 feet and
in the back another 160 feet which added up to 450
feet; that this evening he had seen another map
with different numbers which showed the back lot
170 feet.
Planning Director Director Cht.vetta stated the map approved
showed 125 feet for the first lot 115 for the second
lot which would be 240 feet; that this would be after
the street was in; that additional 10 or 20 feet was
being taken which would make it 260.
Mr. John F. Rhodes, 3642 N. Barnes, Baldwin Park, stated
he was in opposition to the plan in its entirety; that
he had bought a ranch there about 15 years ago for
$25,000; that he had spent 15 years of hard labor and
about $35,000 to $40,000; that to chop 100 feet off of
the back and another 60 feet for a road would not leave
very much profit.
Planning Director Chivetta stated that the rear portion
of Mr. Rhodes property would be affected by Street A",
under the proposed amendment some 60 by 132 feet; that
the existing General Plan would take a lot 60 by 400.
Mr. Alvin Ahlers, 12845 Salisbury, Baldwin Park, stated
he did not go for the plan at all. He stated he could
not see putting in paper" streets and then getting the
zoning necessary for the development.
Reverend M. J. Belly 12855 0alihury, Baldwin Park,
stated of the various properties he thought perhaps
a greater portion of his property would be taken; that
this plan was considerably better than the other"
but there was a general feeling that they could work
together in developing perhaps a better plan or at
least some modification to this one that would give
better use of the land; that he was willing to make
some sacrifices for the development of the property
and for the City of Baldwin Park; that he would like
at least to get out of the property what he had put
in it.
Mr. Ernie Hernandez, 3657 Rhodes Lane, Baldwin Park,
asked what the present zoning was on Ramona Boulevard.
July 6, 1966
Page 20
JAMES ROGERS,
12875 Salisbury,
B.Pk.
KIRK DANIEL,
12867 Salisbury,
B.Pk.
JOHN F. RHODES,
3642 N. Barnes,
B.Pk.
ALVIN AHLERS,
12845 Salisbury,
B.Pk.
REV. M. J. BELL,
12855 Salisbury,
B.Pk.
ERNIE HERNANDEZ,
3657 Rhodes Lane,
B.Pk.
Continued)
BIB]
39576-U01
1966-U02
07-U02
06-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116938-U03
DO117004-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/7/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1966 07 06 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 1 ÉÍ«3 0
1
Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council
Planning Director Chivetta stated it was R-1 except for
the corner of Rhodes Lane and Barnes which were C-2.
Mr-. Hernandez asked if the amendment was made tonight
Would the zoning be changed wherein Mayor pro tem
ahead stated no.
City Attorney Flandrick stated this amendment had no
affect on zoning,,
W,. Hernandez stated he was opposed to the mobile home
park going in,,
As there was no one else in the audience desiring to speak
either in behalf of or in opposition to SP-4, Mayor pro
em Morehead declared the public hearing closed.
In answer to a question by Councilwoman Gregory, Planning
Director Chivetta stated this plan showed Salisbury to be
continued through the Edison right-of-stay to connect
in with the existing street to the east.
RESOLUTION NO. 66-181 APPROVING
AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN
SP-4)
COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CONCUR
W%'ITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND
APPROVE BLOCK STUDY D; AND THAT RESOLUTION NO. 66-181
BE ADOPTED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILWOMAN
GREGORY SECONDED. Roll Call. There were no objections,
the motion carried.
00-
It wws the time and place fixed for a public hearing on a
Short Form 1911 Act for curbs and gutters on the southeast
side of Depot Avenue between Jeremie Avenue and Central
Avenue,
Proper publication, postings and mailings had been
accomplished.
No written protests had been received.
Assistant City Engineer Fogle stated over fifty percent
n50%1 of the curbs and gutters were in.
As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak
either in behalf of or, in opposition to this Short Form
1911 Act, Mayor pro tem Morehead declared the public
hearing closed,
RESOLUTION NO. 66-177 MAKING FINDINGS
AND OVERRULING PROTESTS AND OBJECTIONS
AND ORDERING THE SUPERINTENDENT OF
STREETS OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK TO
CONSTRUCT CURBS AND GUTTERS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF BALDWIN
PARK STANDARD PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
CONFORMING WITH EXISTING CURBS AND
Continued)
July 6, 1966
Page 21
PUBLIC HEARING
DECLARED CLOSED
SP-4
RES. NO. 66-181
APPROVING AMEND-
MENT TO GENERAL
PLAN SP-4)
RES. NO. 66-181
ADOPTED APPROVING
BLOCK STUDY D
PUBLIC HEARING
SHORT FOR M 1911 ACT
CG ON SE SIDE OF
DEPOT AVE. BETWEEN
JEREMIE AVE. AND
CENTRAL AVE.
66-S-21)
PUBLICATION,
POSTINGS, MAILINGS
NO WRITTEN PROTESTS
RESUME
PUBLIC HEARING
DECLARED CLOSED
RES. NO. 66-177
MAKING FINDINGS
AND OVERRULING PRO-
TESTS AND OBJECTIONS
AND ORDERING SUPT.
OF STREETS OF CITY
OF B,PK. TO CON-
STRUCT C AND G IN
Continued)
BIB]
39576-U01
1966-U02
07-U02
06-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116938-U03
DO117004-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/7/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1966 07 06 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 1 ÉÍ«Regular Meeting'of the Baldwin Park City Council
GUTTERS CONSTRUCTED UPON THEM
FACING THE SOUTHEAST SIDE OF DEPOT
AVENUE BETWEEN JEREMIE AVENUE AND
CENTRAL AVENUE 66.5-21)
COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 66-177 BE
ADOPTED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN ADAIR
SECONDED. Roll Call. There were no objections, so
ordered.
00-
City
Asst.lEngineer Fogle reviewed his report on the initiation
of a Short Form 1911 Act for curbs, gutters and sidewalks
on the northeast side of Pacific Avenue between Puente
Avenue and Big Dalton Avenue.
RESOLUTION NO. 66-174 DECLARING ITS
INTENTION TO CAUSE THE CONSTRUCTION
OF CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK PURSUANT
TO THE PROVISION OF SECTION 5870 ET SEQ
OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE OF
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 66-174 BE
ADOPTED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN ADAIR
SECONDED. Roll Cali. There were no objections, the
motion carried.
00-
City
AsstjEngineer Fogle reviewed his report on the initiation
of a Short Form 1911 Act for sidewalks on the northeast
side of Foster Avenue between Frazier Street and Sparland
Avenue.
RESOLUTION NO. 66-175 DECLARING ITS
INTENTION TO CAUSE THE CONSTRUCTION OF
SIDEWALK PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF
SECTION 5870 ET SEQ OF THE STREETS AND
HIGIVIAYS CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNCILMAN ADAIR MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 66-175 BE
ADOPTED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILWOMAN
GREGORY SECONDED. Roll Call. There were no objections,
the motion carried.
00-
City
Asst./Engineer Fogle stated that Mr. Levin's Tract No.
29417 had been completed with the exception of the storm
drain between Grace Avenue and Adour Lane; that Mr. Benson
had concurred with the street pattern and construction had
Continued)
July 6, 1966
Peg. 22
IN ACCORDMICE WITH
CITY OF B.PK. STMT..
DARD PLANS AND SPECS.
CONFORMING WITH
EXISTING C AND 9
CONSTRUCTED UPON Twat****
FACING SE SIDE OF
DEPOT AVE. BETWEEN
JEREMIE AVE. AND
CENTRAL AVE, J"-,S-2
RES. NO. 66-177
ADOPTED
INITIATION OF
SHORT FORM 1911 ACT
NE SIDE PACIFIC AVE.
BETWEEN PUENTE AVE.
AND BIG DALTON AVE.
RES. NO. 66.176
DECLARING ITS INTENT.
TO CAUSE CONSTRUCTION
OF COS PURSUANT TO THE
PROVISIONS OF SECTION
5870 ET SEQ OF THE
STS. AND M1
YS
CODE OF STATE F CALIF.
S"t
RES. NO. 66.174
ADOPTED
P H. AUG. S, 1966
INITIATION OF SHORT
FORM 1911 ACT NE
SIDE FOSTER AVE.
BETWEEN FRAZIER ST.
AND SPARLAND AVE,
RES. NO. 66.175
DECLARING INTENT.
TO. CAUSE CONSTRUCTIO
OF SIDEWALK PURSUANT
TO PROVISIONS OF
SECTION 5070 ET SEQ Or
STS. AND H IGFWAYS CODE
OF STATE OF CALIF.
RES. NO. 66-175
ADOPTED
P.H. AUG. 3, 1966
TRACT NO. 29417
N. LEVIN
BIB]
39576-U01
1966-U02
07-U02
06-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116938-U03
DO117004-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/7/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1966 07 06 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 1 ÉÍ«301
Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council
begun on Grace Avenue extension. He recommended that the
bonding requirement be reduced to $700.00 the storm drain
cost.
COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT THE COUNCIL CONCUR WITH
THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY ENGINEER AND REDUCE THE
BOND TO $700.00. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. Roil Call.
There were no objections, the motion carried.
City
Asst./Engineer Fogle stated that bids for construction
of curb and gutter and sidewalk had been opened oh
July I, 1966. He recommended that the bid be awarded
to Peak Construction Company, Covina, California, the
low bidder in accordance with the specifications; that
their bid on proposal No. 11 was $16,885.00. He stated
the actual amounts would depend upon the work accomplished.
COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT THE COUNCIL CONCUR WITH
THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY ENGINEER, THAT THE AWARD
BE MADE TO PEAK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY IN THE SUM OF
$16,885.00. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. Roll Call.
There were no objections, the motion carried.
00-
ORDINANCE NO. 458 ADDING SECTION 3101
TO THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATING TO THE FIRE CODE
COUNC I LWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT FURTHER READING OF
ORDINANCE NO. 458 BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED.
Roll Call. There were no objections, the motion carried.
COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 458 BE
ADOPTED. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. Roll Call. There
were no objections, the motion carried.
00-
Councilwoman Gregory stated that the July 4th celebration
had been a success; that there had been fine attendance
in the park; that the fireworks display was exceptional;
that the programs had been coordinated by the Junior
Chamber of Commerce, the Chamber of Commerce and the
Police Department; that Officer Jim Flavin should be
commended for his efforts with a certificate of some type
of award; and that the school should be thanked for the
use of the athletic field and their maintenance men.
Discussion followed that an estimated nine to ten thousand
people had viewed the fireworks display.
00m
Councilwoman Gregory explained that the Sixth Annual
Seminar of Independent Cities of Los Angeles County
would be held in San Diego on September 23, 24 and 25th.
She asked for Council's authorization to attond as Mr.
John P. Kearney, Seminar Chairman had designated her
Continued)
July 6, 1966
Page 23
MOTION MADE AND
CARRIED THAT COUNCIL
CONCUR WITH REC.
OF CITY ENGR. AND
REDUCE THE BOND TO
$700.00
BIDS CONSTRUCTION
OF CURB, GUTTER AND
SIDEWALK
MOTION MADE AND
CARRIED THAT COUNCIL
CONCUR WITH REC. OF
CITY ENGR., THAT THE
AWARD BE MADE TO PEAK
CONSTRUCTION CO. IN THE
SUM OF $16,885.00
ORD. NO. 458
ADDING SECT. 3101
TO B.P.M.C. RE
FIRE CODE
FURTHER READING OF
ORD. NO. 458 WAIVED
ORD. NO. 458
ADOPTED
RE COMMENDATION
JIM FLAVIN
REQUEST BY COUNCIL-
WOMAN GREGORY TO
ATTEND SEMINAR OF
INDEPENDENT CITIES
OF L.A. CO.
BIB]
39576-U01
1966-U02
07-U02
06-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116938-U03
DO117004-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/7/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1966 07 06 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 1 ÉÍ«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council
as chairman of the Ladies Program Committee, stating
that it was an honor to be selected. She stated that
City Attorney Flandrick was in charge of programing.
Councilwoman Gregory also requested authorization to
attend The League of California Cities Annual Conference
in San Diego, October 16 to 19, 1966.
COUNCILMAN ADAIR MOVED THAT $150.00 BE APPROVED FOR
COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY TO ATTEND THE INDEPENDENT CITIES
SEMINAR IN SAN DIEGO, SEPTEMBER 23 TO 25. COUNCILMAN MORE-
HEAD SECONDED. Roll Call. There were no objections,
the motion carried.
COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT $150.00 BE APPROVED
FOR COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY TO ATTEND THE LEAGUE OF
CALIFORNIA CITIES CONFERENCE IN SAN DIEGO, OCTOBER
16 TO 19. COUNCILMAN ADA I R SECONDED. Roll Call.
There were no objections, the motion carried.
Chief Administrative Officer Nordby suggested that
anyone planning to attend the League Meeting in San
Diego could let the City Clerk know so reservations
could be made.
0.00-
On the recommendation of the City Attorney, COUNCILMAN
ADA I R MOVED THAT NUISANCE CASE N-4 BE DROPPED FROM THE
AGENDA. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY SECONDED. There were no
objections, the motion carried and was so ordered by
Mayor pro tem Morehead.
00-
Chief Administrative Officer Nordby requested Council
approval for his attendance at the City Managers
meeting; that there was a meeting in Anaheim and one
in Berkeley; that both were scheduled for Thursday,
July 25, 1966; that the expense was allowed in the
budget.
There were no objections.
00-
RESOLUTION NO. 66a-175 ALLO'v'JING CLAIMS
AND DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY OF BALDWIN
PARK
COUNCILMAN ADAIR MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 66-175 BE
APPROVED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNC I LWOMAN
GREGORY SECONDED. Roll Call. There were no objections,
the motion carried.
July 6, 1966
Page 2)4
MOTION MADE AND
CARRIED THAT $150.OC°
BE APPROVED FOR
COUNCILWOMAN GREGORN
TO ATTEND THE INDE-
PENDENT CITIES
SEMINAR IN SAN DIEGO,
SEPT. 23 TO 25
MOTION MADE AND
CARRIED THAT $150.00
BE APPROVED FOR
COUNC I LWOMAN GREGORY
TO ATTEND THE LEAGUE
OF CALIF. CITIES
CONFERENCE IN SAN
DIEGO, OCT. 16 TO 19
PUBLIC NUISANCE N-4
DROPPED FROM AGENDA
C.A.O. REQ. COUNCIL
APPROVAL FOR ATTEND-
ANCE AT CITY MANAGERS
MEETING, JULY 25, 1966
NO OBJECTIONS
RES. NO. 66-175
CLMS. AND DEMANDS
AGAINST CITY OF B.PK.
RES. NO. 66-175
ADOPTED
00-
BIB]
39576-U01
1966-U02
07-U02
06-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116938-U03
DO117004-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/7/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1966 07 06 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 1 ÉÍ«3%5
Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Paitk City Council July 6, 1966
Page 25
AT 11:08 P.M. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAt m0'ED THAT THE CITY
COUNCIL ADJOURN. COUNCILMAN ADA IR SECONDED. There were
no objections, the motion carried and was so ordered by
Mayor pro tem Morehead. AN. II:08 P.M.
00®
THELMA L. BALKUS, CITY CLERK
APPROVED C,ua 3 1966.
Date of Distribution to City Council 1966.
Date of Distribution to Departments,__ 1966.
BIB]
39576-U01
1966-U02
07-U02
06-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116938-U03
DO117004-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/7/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1966 07 06 CC MIN HÄ—@¸— 1 ÉÍ«REGULAR MEETING OF THE BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL JULY 6, 1966
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER) 14403 EAST PACIFIC AVENUE 7:30 P.M.
I
In accordance with Section 2703 of the Municipal Code the
City Council met in open meeting at 7:00 p.m. in the
Conference Room for an informal session with the staff
to be informed on regular agenda items.
The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park met in
regular session at the above place at 7:30 p.m.
Councilman Adair led the salute to the flag
FLAG SALUTE
Roll Call: Present: COUNCILMEN ADAIR AND GREGORY, ROLL CALL
AND MAYOR PRO TEM MOREHEAD
ABSENT: MAYOR MCCARON, COUNCILMAN
CRITES, AND CITY ENGINEER
FRENCH
ALSO PRESENT: CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER
NORDBY, CITY ATTORNEY FLANDRICK,
ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER FOGLE,
BUILDING SUPERINTENDENT KALBFLEISCH,
PLANNING DIRECTOR CHIVETTA,
FINANCE DIRECTOR DUNCAN, AND
CITY CLERK BALKUS CHIEF OF
POLICE ADAMS ARRIVED AT 7:1x.3 P.M.)
00-
CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARINGS CONTINUATION OF
P.H.
L. CP-77 Appeal from decision of Board of Zoning CONT'D TO
Adjustments, An application submitted by L. JULY 20, 1966
Richey, for a Conditional Use Permit pursuant
to the Baldwin Park City Council Resolution
No. 64-187, to allow the construction and
maintenance of a dog kennel upon a parcel of
land located at 5111 Bleecker Street, in the
M-I light manufacturing) Zone
00-
At 11:08 P.M. Mayor pro tem MOREHEAD MOVED THAT THE CITY ADJ. AT 11:08 P.M.
COUNCIL ADJOURN. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. There were
no objections, the motion carried and was so ordered by
Mayor pro tem Morehead.
00-
I
THELMA L. BALKUS, CITY CLERK
BIB]
39576-U01
1966-U02
07-U02
06-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116938-U03
DO117004-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/7/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
Í«Regu n; Mes r dig o the i`3 dr n Pork City Counc i
there had bee e mer;ionny in the district this would
be slow p but if this youId be a way out would
this be ancept b'.Je,
R,ev%'is s3°eted they were perfect y wi I I ing to pay
4^ry p t of their f„ it share of the cost; that they
had bor o'?Wed every cot they could that they nru d
be gied to go into an a;sessment district.
air, Nirho;son stated that it was being assumed that
because of this one solo! that rher is was a low flow
She irei; that X200 feet e4ti~
000 g was a r i i ab- i n;; that t h^ was the very
end of their system and hr pipe We leading to the
n r°-al r ert home a tour 7 inch, that maybe is 10,
houses Piy Way mould h. 1000 q r'oy that the
OMy Y's Y m.Wc fir0q; supplier end the
had been o_ e rP r 9:6 and at that time
there r no re oy eeui°gmorr that WE-
system was ayaoua for residential une.
City Attorney F l tndr'ici stated as far as the determina-
tion of the r e the Corer I I hid the authority to over-
rule the cle,te-r nctlon of the Fire Chief or conditionally
approve it or to opr ove it es made that the Council
could require as a r.or r i t i otn, as Mr. Rev i s had suggested,
that the company join in an assessment district if one was
successful in Writing to roristr uct new lines, that this
could be investigated is a possibility if the Council were
to approve it no the I +` I; taw that the Coun I had
ev i deoc: e from ii Navin end from the company indicating
that there was some mr g of safety so he did not think
the Council had any p' ii. rn to far as l iabi l ty was con-
ed er d that Mr. Re's; i s had indicated they had no
objectior to give to the City on indemnification should
any injury or property damage incur; that the Council
could condition its epp o.yai on that basis as well as the
requirement that they par i rip_ to in any assessment
district.
He further stated he would pass on the moral aspect but
as for a any legs! aspect was concerned he was sure
they had irsuraece and if such an indemnification agree-
ment would be required of them that they mould spend the
add i i ona ii $300 a yee W no-assurance covering the
City„ that the natation of rfr a the Council could do to
upgrade h: 50101s; w vs pother problem; that it was
w' etiaiiv.;: opiaisl TPA wi d it might be difficWt to
i *' ate an a.. le:ssma'i r t
Chief rrriel x''
the iofor
cx. mp i es, h he
rotiP 3uIy 20th re,
Mr. Rev i s rv member
would i i k: to give the i ore'"
stated in view of l ry
Yom h=? become qai..
the Council d::.fur act ion
that he had talked with
ire Wartment; that he
1 a report.
C0UNC I V(),'14N GREGORY MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL TAKE THIS
CASE 001C V-0) UNDER Sufism 1 SIGN UNTIL. THE NEZ T MEETING
9JULY 20, 196611. COUNCILMAN ADA I R SECONDED. ft o O Call l
There were no objections, the motion carried.
JuI'y 6s i966
Cage 12
POTION MADE AND
CARRIED THAT COUNCIL
TAKE THIS CASE LACFC
V-11) UNDER SUBMISSION
UNTIL NEXT MTG. JULY
20, $966)
O0-
BIB]
39576-U01
1966-U02
07-U02
06-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9994-U03
FO116938-U03
DO117004-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
5/7/2008-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06