Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1966 07 06 CC MIN1966 07 06 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1ÉÍ«2991 I REGULAR MEETING CF THE BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL JULY 6, 1966 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAAMBfER) 14403 East Pacific Avenue 7:30 P.M. in. accordance with Section 2703 of the Municipal Code the City Council met in open meeting at 7:00 p.m, in the Conference Room for an Informal session with the staff to be informed on regular agenda items, The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park met in regular session at the above place at 7:30 p,m, Councilman Adair led the salute to the flag. FLAG SALUTE nil all: Present: COUNCILMEN ADAIR AND GREGORY, ROLL CALL AND 1AYOR. PRO TEN'. MOREHEAD Absent: CCUN•NC I LMAN F'.1T A'1r CITY Also F'resent: CNi.`, A.t,'!f'I 7RATiVE v--R!CER 1rt t r", CITY ATTORNEY FLAMDRICK, A' T' A1T CITY ENGINEER ROGUE, I_ 1G t_'P I f'sT"T'1DF1'!T KALI;FLE I SOH, AM111'16 rC T CH i VETTH 1 N NCE DIRECTOR DUNCAN, AND CITY CLERK 3ALKU:; Chief of Police Adams arrived at 7:43 p.m.) C U4!t L JOPtw'.( G EG. FRY THAT r;,YC MCC, ON, GUNC I LiyL N MAYOR A CCAR<ON, E:. T ANC) i T" NG 1_NCH a,U COUNC I L! AN' COUNCILMAN 0311' %,A LftN U. There were no objections, the motion AND CITY ENGINE- carried and was so ordered by i,,ayor pro tem Morehead, FRENCH EXCUSED 00- At 7:35 p.m. Finance Director uncap was excused from the 7:35 P.M. F INANCE Council Chamber. Dll:. DUNCAN EXCUSED 00.. I Mr. James A. Garrow, 1011 North Baldwin Park Boulevard, JAP S A. GARROW, Baldwin Park, representing the Baldwin Park improvement 1011 N. B.Pk. Blvd., Association, stated that they were glad things were B. Pk., REPRESENTING progressing in the matter of the money for the land that B.PK. IMPROVEMENT s acquired for thy: fre ways from Barnes lark; that A1350C. the money should be used for approximately three 3) ser~tl1 ti 2) acre or three acre plots for parks one located south of the railroad tracks, one In the north part of the nd: one In the east; that they strongly urged that when money was acquired that it be used for thTs purpose; that they wished the City all success and would be glad to help in matters where they could be of help. Mayor pro tem Morehead stated at this time the City did not know how much money would be received; that whatever amount was transferred to.the City would be used for park expansion; that the Improvement Association and all other groups that were interested would have a big hand In helping the City Council and the Park Board design and establish these parks; that Chief Administrative Officer Nordby was working on a report on the items and Informa- tion that he had at hand for public Information; that this nformation would be in the next newsletter. URGING THAT MONEY YET TO B ACQUIRED) FOR LAND THAT WAS ACQUIRED FOR FREEWAYS FROM BARNES PARK TO BE USED FOR 3 MALL PARKS BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 07-U02 06-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117004-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 07 06 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1ÉÍ«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council City Clerk Balkus presented a letter from F. Stoskus et al dated Juke 23, 1966, regarding the proposed R-l regulation amendments. City Attorney Flandrick suggested that the Council note and file this; that they would be having another public hearing on this matter. As there were no objections, Mayor pro tem Morehead so ordered. 00- City Attorney Flandrick explained that Resolution No. 66-173 had been requested by the Council in connection with Z-291; that the conditions have been imposed prior to the rezoning of the property. RESOLUTION NO. 66-173 DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO REZONE CERTAIN HEREAFTER DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY Case Number: Z-291; Location: 13703-13725 Los Angeles Street, and 4418 Walnut Street; Applicant: Strowburgh) COUNCILMAN ADA I R MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 66-I 73 BE ADOPTED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. MAYOR PRO TEM MOREHEAD SECONDED. Roll Call. There were no objections, the motion carried. City Attorney Flandrick presented Ordinance No. 456 stating this was for first reading only and in view of the adoption of Resolution No. 66-173 second read- ing would not be given until conditions were met. ORDINANCE NO. 456 AtVIEND I NG THE ZONING MAP OF SAID CITY, AND REZONING CERTAIN HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM ZONE R-3 TO C-2 ZONE CASE NO. Z-291) COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT FURTHER READING OF July 6, 1966 Page 2 LETTER. FROM F. ti TOSKU' ET AL t•:ATED 1966, 1;' P~t11 is r_~: R-I REGULATION AIY` END- K NTS NOTED AND FILES RES. NO. 66-173 DECLARING INTENT. TO REZONE CERTA I N HEREAFTER DESCRIBED REAL. PROPERTY CASE NO.: Z-291; LOCATION: 13703-31725 L.A. ST., AEU) 441€ WALNUT 5,T.; AFPL ICANT: S'i ROWBURGH) RES. NO. 66--173 ADOF TE D SECOND READ I NG OF ORE). NO. 456 TO BE HELL) UNTIL CONDITIONS lOF RES NO. 66-173 A' IE MET ORL). NO. 456 NN\END. ZON. MAP OF MIU CITY, AND RE. ZON I NG CEi TA 111 HEREIN DES.CR I BE B REAL PROPERTY iF;P'014 ZONE R-3 TO C-2 ZONE CASE NO. 7-29 FURTHER READ INS ORDINANCE SECONDED. carried. NO. 456 BE A I VED COUNC I LIMN ADAIR There were no objections, the motion OF ORB WA I VE D NO. 1-56 COUNC I LWNWOMAW GREGORY MOVED THAT ORB I NANCE NO. 456 BE INTRODUCED. COUNCILMAN ADA I R SECONDED. Rol 1 C a l l There were no objections, the motion carried. CID. NO. 456 I N I I'.)DUCED 00-- BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 07-U02 06-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117004-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 07 06 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1ÉÍ«I Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council City Attorney Flandrick presented Ordinance No. 460 stating this was placed before the Council at the request of the Chief of Police; that If adopted the only change in the first subparagraph, subparagraph a, was that it relates only to any pool room billiard hall which was open to the public; that those places in the absence of a permit issued by this Council would be closed from 2:00 a.m. to 6:00 a.m.; that the other provision, subparagraph c, would allow Council to grant a permit upon application by an individual who desired to run a twenty-four 24) hour operation. ORDINANCE NO. 460 AMENDING SECTION 4243 OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO BILLIARD AND POOL ROOM FACILITIES COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT FURTHER READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 460 BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. There were no objections, the motion carried. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 460 BE INTRODUCED. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. Roll Call, There were no objections, the motion carried. 00- City Attorney Flandrick presented a proposed agreement between the City and Mr. Homer Howard Benson with reference to the dedication of portions of Grace Avenue and Adour Lane; that this agreement in principle had been approved by the Council at a prior meeting; that it permitted the encroachment some two 2) feet of the existing residential structure adjacent to Adour Lane into the right-of-way; that that license as such would terminate upon destruction of the building or the passage of twenty-five 25) years; that approval was recommended. He further stated the agreement also included the construction of street improvements on Adour Lane and Grace Avenue. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT THE AGREEMENT BE APPROVED. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. Roll Call, There were no objections, the motion carried. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK BE AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE SAID AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. Roll Call. There were no objections, the motion carried. 00- City Attorney Flandrick stated that Chief of Police Adams had advised him that Officer McNulty had submitted his resignation; that the City had entered into an agree- ment with Officer McNulty concerning the use of a Police Dog owned by Officer McNulty; that the agreement was, in essence, that the City would. purchase the dog from Officer McNulty for the sum of $1.00 and at such time as he was terminated or resigned that he would have the option to repurchase the dog for the same amount; that Officer McNulty had indicated his desire to exercise this option; Continued) July 6, 1966 Page 3 ORD. NO, 460 AMEND. SECTION 4243 OF B.PK, MUN. CODE RE BILLIARD AND POOL ROOM FACILITIES FURTHER READING OF ORD. NO. 460 WAIVED ORD. NO. 460 INTRODUCED AGREEMENT HOMER HOWARD BENSON RE DEDICATION OF PORTIONS OF GRACE AVE. AND ADOUR LANE AGREEMENT APPROVED AGREEMENT AUTH. TO BE EXECUTED BY MAYOR AND CITY CLERK RE OFFICER MCNULTY'S RESIGNATION C 508) BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 07-U02 06-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117004-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 07 06 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1ÉÍ«299 Reguiir Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council July 6, 1966 Page 4 that is was recommended that the Mayor and City Clerk be autnor ized to execute a Bill of Sale to Officer McNulf`r' for the Police Dog Shane) for the sum of $1.00. As there were no objections, Mayor pro tem Morehead instructed that the Chief Administrative officer or the Chief of Police write Mr. McNulty a letter of commenda- tion for services rendered in the use of the dog. C OUN' UAAN ADA I R MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNC I L AUTHORIZE MAYOR AND CITY CLER RHE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE A BILL OF SALE TO AUTH. TO EXECUTE BI OFFICER MCNULTY FOR THE DOG AS DESCRIBED IN THE OCTOBER OF SALE TO OFFICER 1964, AGREEMENT, FOR THE COMPENSATION IN THE SLW OF MCNULTY FOR DOG AS $1,00. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY SECONDED. Roll Call. There DESCRIBED IN OCT. 7, were no objections, the motion carried. 1964, AGREEMENT, FOR COMPENSATION IN SUM OF $1.00 00- Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated the Council CHAMBER OF COMMERCE had before them in agreement patterned after the one executed AGREEMENT 196667 last year between the City of Baldwin Park and the Chamber of Commerce; that if approved the first quarterly payment would be due in August. Councilwoman Gregory suggested that the agreement beheld over. As there were no objections, Mayor pro tea Morehead HELD OVER TO NEXT stated this item would be held over until the next REG. MTG., JULY 20, regular meeting. 1966 00- Chief Administrative Officer Nordby reviewed his report REPORT ON BID OPENING on the bid opening held June 28, 1966, for three 3) HELD JUNE 28, 1966 compact cars for the Police Department stating the only FOR 3 COMPACT CARS bidder under the circumstances was Norman King Dodge FOR POLICE DEPT. of Glendon; that if there was deferred action on this item the City might not be able to replace the existing Detective Units until November or December; that they were specially built models with extra heavy suspension d other police items; that the cars the City presently had were 1963 Studebakers; that the Studebekers were in bad shape and ma ntenance costs were going up; that it was recommended that the bid be awarded to Norman King Dodge of Gierdora. COUNCI L.40,N AD.A I R MOVED TH< T THE CITY COUNC I L ACCEPT HE:SE CARS. TO AWARD THE BID TO NORMAN KING DODGE OF GLENDORA FOR THE TOTAL SUM OF $6,092.89) Councilwoman Gregory asked for an explanalj[on concerning the air conditioning. Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated-this was a second suggestion that the cars could be equipped with air conditioning at the cost of $240.00 per unit; that his first recommendation was only for the basic units. Counci lDman Gregory commented that the report indicated the over expenditure for the air conditioning units would be offset by a deferral in the hiring of the newly authorized personnel for the Police Department. She stated the Council had asked in the post to have some study made as to whether the City would benefit by leasing cars. Continued) MOTION MADE BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 07-U02 06-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117004-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 07 06 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1ÉÍ«2995 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council Chief Administrative.Officer Nordby stated that the International City Managers Association had made very cromprehensive studies on the leasing of all types of equipment; that actually there was very little d i f feren e as for as economics was concerned between leasing and purchasing; that he could make the Information Immediately available. Councllwomin Gregory stated that possibly one other source of Information that could be researched would be Los Angeles County. Chief of Police Adams stated he had checked with the Oldsmobile dealer mentioned by Councilwoman Gregory and the adjoinin city that was fortunate to get the lease, plan at $.06& a mite; that the owner of the agency indicated he would not lease the cars to Baldwin Park or any city at toss than $.08 a mile; that he would charge $.07j for compact cars; that the City could not coma close to the price bid with a company offering the lease plan. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY SECONDED, Councilman Adair's motion, Roll Call. There were no objections, the motion carried. Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated the price of the air conditioners per unit was $240.00; that while it was true many people did not have air condT•• ti®ning units In their personal cars a policeman makes his'Tiviihood in them; that his recommendation was to acquire the units and make up the deficit in the appropriation through deferment of hiring; that one of the policemen now on the force must go into miii•tary service during the course of this year for a six month period; that he would be entitled to his position when he returned and in this one item alone would be sufficient savings to pick up the deficit, In answer to a question by Councilwoman Gregory con- corning bucket a oats, Chief of Police Adams stated that with the bucket soots there..was more flexibility in getting In and out of cars In a hurryi when It was required to have two policeman of different heights riding together; that unfortunatel the vehicles being purchased for the Detective Units did not have bucket soots; that bids had notbeen'dis:guoIIfled because they did not bid bucket seats. Councilman Morehead stated that It was his understanding that vehicles were, worth $100.00 more on a trade In if they had air conditioning units. COUNC I LM N ADA I R AMD THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZE TOE PURCHASE OF THREE 3) AIR CONDITIONING UNITS-AT THE COST OF $240.00 A PIECE. COUNC iLWONAN GREGORY SECONDED. Roil Call. There ware no objections, the motion carr i eel. City Clark Balkas administered the oath to these'in the audience desiring to be heard during the meeting. July 6, 1966 Page a MOTION CARRIED THAT CITY CO(NC I L ACCEPT CARS TO AWARD B ID TO NORMAN 9 I NG DODGE OF GLENDORA FOR TOTAL SUM OF $6,092,09) PURCHASE OF 3 AIR CONDITIONING UNITS AT COST-OF $240 A PIECE AUTN,6 OATH ADMINISTERED BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 07-U02 06-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117004-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 07 06 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1ÉÍ«299f Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council July 6, 1966 Page 6 As there were no objections, Mayor pro tem Morehead HEARING LACFC V-I announced that on the advice of the City Attorney TRI-CITY GOLDEN AGE, the Council would proceed with Item No. 3 under the CONVALESCENT HOME, Chief Administrative Officer, LACFC V-I, 14475 Ituni 14475 iTt1NI ST. Street, Tri-City Golden Age Convalescent Home, as there was an on duty Fireman present who would be testifying regarding this case. City Attorney Flandrick stated Mr. John Revis, Attorney for the applicant, was present; that the Council had before them copies of the letter from Mr. Revis dated June 21, 1966 and a letter directed to Mr. Revis from the Southwest Fire Protection Company dated June 14, 1966, Mr. John T. Revis, 18758 East Milton Drive, Glendora, JOHN T. REVIS, stated he represented Golden Age Convalescent Home; 18758 E. Milton Dr., a corporation dealing solely in this sort of an Glendora institutional type of an industry; that Im1961 they had built the 49 bed facility as they had done In several cities in Southern California; that last year when medicare became very apparent as a Public Law they'received communications from the government asking them to do everything they could to expand their facilities; that they did just exactly that; that they had submitted plans to the City in December and of course, all of their plans had to go through the State Department of Hospitals; that their architects were notified because of the addition being away from the street and it being a larger size they had to have in on site hydrant and a sprinkler system, etc, for 1500 gallons per minute pressure on the line; that they had included this in their plans and had built accordingly; that the plans were submitted and a Building Permit was obtained from the City and they had borrowed $180,000.00 for the addition; that it was built and just about ready to open up; that about one month ago the Fire Inspector was around and although they had built to handle the 1500 g.p.m. there was no place they could hook up to the line; that the main in the street only supplied 540 g.p.m.; that they checked back with their engineers and found with the type of structure they had there was no danger of fire hazard; that they were classified as being very light hazard; that the authorities would show that their system would work very well on the 540 g.p,m. which was available; that unfortunately, however, the Fire Inspector said that the Code stated that they had to have 1500 g.p,m. pressure and they did not have it and could not get the City approval on the Building Permit without which they could not operate; that they asked that the Council favorably consider their request for a variance. Councilman Morehead asked if he understood correctly that at the time the plans were drawn and submitted that the company was aware of the fact that they would be required to furnish 1500 g.p.m. Revis stated not the company, the architects were; that they picked this up from the requirements of the City Code; that they put this on the plan that the Building Department approved and issued a permit. Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 07-U02 06-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117004-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 07 06 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1ÉÍ«2997 Regular Meeting of the B&ldwln Park City Council July 6, 1966 Page 7 I Councilmen Morehead questioned whether the company was aware of the fact that 1500 g.p.m. was required for the Installation. Mr. Revis stated so far as the plans were concerned; that they assumed this was available at the street because their plans showed they would hook up to the males in the street; that he was not trying to cast reflection on anyone but he had handled several water cases of this nature and invariably the city building departments would not grant permits unless the facilities were somewhere ava i t ab l e or unless the applicant could show where he was going to get i t; that when the permit came back and indicated this they assumed the water was at the line in the street; that the water company stated they had no obligation, and legally he did not think they did, to up" their capacity down that street; that any time a larger main was put through there they would be happy to hook up and would expect to pay their shire of the cost; that he understood they could run a line under the freeway and get water from somewhere on the north side but they did not have the money to do this. City Attorney Fiandrick asked if he understood that the facilities actually constructed insofar as the interior portion of the building was concerned would have a capacity of the 1500 g.p.m.; w s it merely the source they were concerned with? Mr. Revis stated yes; that they had a six 16) inch line capable of handling the pressure; that they had the on site fire hydrant res.air'ed and a sprinkler system to handle the pressure but they d?d not have the eater. Councilman Morehead asked, in order to get the water, would Mr. Revis" company be required to pay the entire cost of installation. Mr. Revis stated this was his understanding, not just the installation but bringing in the line. A Chief Parsons, Los Angeles County Fire Department, stated CHIEF PARSONS, he was waiting for their Fire Rating Analyst to arrive LOS ANGELES COUNTY who has had the expert knowledge on the requirements of FIRE DEPT'. the Board of Underwriters of the American Insurance Associa- tion; that the purpose of the Fire Department was to prevent loss of life and property due to fire; that in this line it was the duty of the Fire Chief to be professionally aware of the standards and re~juirements to provide adequate fire protection; that it was the Fire Depar°ttment's responsibility to provide the highest level of lire protection as consistent with economic factors such s assessed vca:luaation and the fire situation; that these levels of prote; i ion were stated in the grading schedule of theft ioa:ai Board of Fire Underwiters, know as the Americ-a:, sur ce Associ~ t ion; that the City of Baldwin Park now hnd rating in most areas of Class 5 on a scale from I to 10; that the duelling class rate was Class 4 which was quite a good rating; that in their denart- ment some areas had a Class 3 overall rating and this was the rating that they were shooting for In Baldwin Park; that in order to come up with a rating like this the deficiency points for the various parts of the grading system had to be reduced to the point where the City would meet this rating; that the most critical factor in fire protection was the water system; that the water need was determined Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 07-U02 06-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117004-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 07 06 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1ÉÍ«2998 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council July 6, 1966 Page 8 by the size of the buildings Involved; that the water system would have to be Improved to better the grade; that the lower the grading level the lower the Insurance rates; that when a City was called for regrading it would not necessarily get an Improved grading; that there were many cases where cities thought their protection facilities had improved to sere they would get a better rating but on examination by the rating bureau of the underwriters It turned out that the developments In the city had not kept up with Improving in a way they should and their rating and insurance rates went up; that the danger they saw in compromising or granting relief to a situation where a certain water supply was required was that when future gredings were requested the City would be directly effected and the deficiency points would be such that the grading would be adversely affected; that they realized that in some cases there was quite a hardship but to allow permanent and frequent variations could hurt the rating for the City; that the City Council had the responsibility and the final determination on the'level of fire protection provided; that the Fire Department would be remiss in their duty if they did not state what the requirements were for a high level of fire protection; that Captain Rotella could give expert testimony on the requirements for fire flows and so on; that he understood in this case the convalescent home was fully aware of the fact that there was not this volume of water available in the street when they started building; that 500 g.p.m. would handle the sprinkler system in the building but what could be done with 540 gallons when the fire department was hooked up to the hydrant in the street and drawing out most all of the water before it got to the convalescent home for fire pr•otectlon services. Mayor pro tern Morehead stated the records showed that the first Installation was constructed In 1961. He asked what fire protection was available to the Golden Age Convalescent Home at that time or prior to this expansion. Chief Parsons stated as far as protection from the fire department there had been just as good a level of fire protection as there was now; that the water supply was the problem; that apparently the four 4) inch main had been in the ground there for some time. Mayor pro tern Morehead stated if the additional pipe size was not required in 1961 for the"49beds Why was It required now or why was the fire department just now pointing out that there should be 1500 g.p.m. Captain Rotella, Los Angeles Couirlty Fire Department, stated the Fire Code under which this particular build- ing became involved was adopted by the County in rebruary 1961; that it would probably be found that this building was built prior to; the adoption of the ordinance by the City; that at the time the first unit was built the State did not require automatic fire sprinklers. Mr. Revis stated there was a statement made that directly challenged the integrity of the company and himself; that he had testified and was willing to take the oath. City Clerk Balkus administered the Oath. OATH ADMINISTERED Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 07-U02 06-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117004-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 07 06 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1É Í«29994, Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council July 6, 1966 Page 9 Captain Rotella stated that the Ordinance involved was adopted in 1961 in January or February. Mr. Revis stated that they were not coming In as a subdivider trying to make a profit; that he was speaking on behalf of the corporation In stating that the offi- cials did not know when they borrowed the money and proceeded with the construction based on the permit from the City that there would not be water available; that he would like to make it very clear under oath that not a one of the officials was aware of this because they would have not have invested this kind of money and faced this kind of a problem. City Clerk Baalkus again administered the Oath, OATH ADMINISTERED City Attorney Flendrick stated that the testimony so for had indicated that there was a Code requirement for 1500 g.p.m, water pressure and asked If this was available to this particular location and if it was how close was it and what would the approximate cost be to hook up to It. Mr. R. H. Nicholson, Jr., Vice President, San Gabriel Valley Water Company, stated it was not available In the mains adjacent to the project but it was available 1200 feet away; that it would cost over $10,000.00 to get the flow there. City Attorney Flandrick asked who would pay this cost. Mr. Nicholson stated It would be paid for by the owner of the property. Captain Rotelle stated part of his responsibility was reviewing the building plans and establishing fire flow and fire hydrant requirements based on their experience, professional Judgment, and standards; that the architect had noted on the plans the standards for the flow requirement and the hydrant requirement; that they naturally would assume that any architect would Inform their client what the recolrements were before he put the notes on the plan because as he under- stood It anything on the plans became a permit require•- Mont, Mr•. Revis stated they were on the plans but as a practical matter he wanted to point out that they submitted the plans for approval to the State aAd the Building Department; that the plans only show the hook up up to the street; that they naturally ssumed there would not be a require- ment there for this type of pressure unless the water was avelleble$ that they hid to reason to believe that this wasn't there or that it would not be called to their attention by the Building Department; that this had to be done before they ever spent a dollar in construction Work and before they acquired the money; that i t was not called to their attention; that they had a six Inch line and nothing to hook up to; that 1961 was a very famous year for the Los Angeles County Fire Department; the year of the big fire; that there was some talk up in the hills about water pressure dropping because wh* the mains were opened in one street the mains were not putting out pressure on other streets; that this County Code must apply to the entire County to the higher fire hazard areas as well as to the lower fire hazard Continued) R.H. NICHOLSON, JR., VICE PRES., SAN OA$RIEL VALLEY WATER CO. BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 07-U02 06-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117004-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 07 06 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1É Í«3000 Regu] r Meet in the E i d r i' x< C a-y Counc i 1 s; th t ne r x U p; the cost of hooking up i f R t h w they felt they were Justified tr9@ z't: Pig S r in asking for this vari Once. Councilwoman Gregory asked what a pump did in the event of lack of wtter pressure wherein Chief Parsons stated that she r e.. r°emert set for building was 1500 g.p.m, with a twenty 120) pound residual, or twenty pounds of pressure left n the 6 rtes; that in order for the fire engine to push the im!ter in sufficient quantities through the fire hoses It had to use a pump for pressure; that the fire engines could pump 1250 g.p.m.; that the purpose of the fire engine was to transfer the water from the water mains to the fire, Mayor pro tem Morehead asked Fire Chief Parsons to comment on the second paragraph of the letter from Southwest Fire Protection Company dated June 14, 1966. Chief Parsons stated they had no quarrel that 500 g.p.m. would supply the sprinkler system in the building but in looking at the picture of protecting not only the convalescent home but the entire area, If the fire engine was pulling 500 g.p.m. out of the main there would not be water there to go into the sprinkler system; that 540 g.p.m. did not meet the standard requirements for this type of protection situation; that even for a scattered residential section the requirements of the Board of Fire Underwriters was a 1,000 g.p.m. with minimum size water mains of six 6) inch; that they did not recognize any pipe or main less than six 6) Inches in diameter, that with any four 4) inch mains they were assessed deficiency points in grading. Mayor pro tem Morehead asked what would happen if there was a fire there and the present water supply was 540 g.p.m. and If there was 1500 g.p.m. available how would this affect the system In the convalescent home.. Chief Parsons stated there would be no effect if the pressure was adequate, however if the pressure was low they would pressurize the sprinkler system from the fire engine; that in fact if there was an emergency situation they would see if there was any way that the water company could boost the water pressure in the main*to give more pressure. He stated It was their res~~~nsibility to point out that fire protection w s deficient; that If a situation where there was a l a,.r ge l ose or a loss of i i fe and the City was aware of it there might be some moral responsibility. Mayor pro tem Morehead asked whose responsibility would It be to bring this up to standards. Chief Parson steted it would be the Council's. Ntr. Revis said Chief Persons stated it would be customary In an area like this to have 1000 g.p.m.; that he would agree with him under his Code but what the Fire Depart- ment was trying to do in this Instance was to require one property owner to provide this high standard of protection that every house in the area did not have; that the real culpret if there was a euipret had to be the water company; that by law there was not much the Continued) July 6, 1966 Page 10 BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 07-U02 06-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117004-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 07 06 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1É Í«ReguO.ar Meeting of the Baldwln Park City Council July 6, 1966 Page II I N City could do because the Code changed after they were well established in the City; that they had nine of these places and in the entire time they had been operating they had only I fire; that con's ruc- i i tn was single story concrete slab; that their rooms by Code had to be where every patient would be within five 5) feet of a door. Chief Parsons, sl-: ted V v- Fire Department pointed out the standards; that it was the City Council's responsibility tether or not the requirements were complied with. Captain James Hartfeld, Los Angeles County Fire Department, stated the building in 1961 was considerably smaller than it was with the new addition; that this in itself would necessitate an increase in a required fire flow; that if the Code had been in effect in 1961 the required fire glow probably would have been less than the 1500 g.p.m. because of the size of the building; that their Department presented e letter dated December 15, 1965 which stated that a water main must be installed to service the private on site hydrant with a minimum fire flow of 1500 g.p.m. at twenty i2O1 pounds residual pressure; that this was submitted to the Building Department and the convalescent home construction people; that it sounded like what they had done was to go ahead and put in everything for 1500 g.p.m. without look- ing around to see if they had a supply; that normally a man building a house would not go out where there was no Edison Company and completely wire his house for electricity. Revis stated they had had two different architects; one I for the first building and one for the second; that he had never denied that the December 15th letter came through and that they had it on the plans; that they had built for i500 g.p,m-; that when they got a permit they assumed this was the Couofyls requirements and when it was in the City's Code that the water company servicing the area would have 1500 gallon mains running down the street. Mayor pro tem Morehead asked whose responsibility would V Revis think it was by someone not checking to see the water was available. Mr. Revis stated mor H y the only way they could have told this would have been to go out and dig a hole in the middle of the street; that they had no reason to believe that the area was substandard in water; that he had seen this political maneuver done before, the CCouc:ty Fire Department said they were trying to raise standards end he agreed with them but he had also seen fnem c.a ch indiv du s rtght in the middle of their po a t c a t p be~.aus h em! i ng the door shut on someone 1 a ke us'! they try to force some, other governmen t a J body to take action and it was a very effective action; that this was what he thought was unt"air°, if the Building Department had stated the supp l v, was not a~~. i 1 ab I L they would not have a leg to stand on but in effect the City had told them come on in, borrow money, and build, and now they could not open their doors,, MAYOR PRO TEM MOREHEAD DECLARED THE HEARING CLOSED. HEARING CLOSED Councilwoman Gregory questioned whether the area could be petitioned to bring in water and share the cost; that City Attorney Flandrick stated that a Fire District could be formed but she understood that unless Continued) 0 Ri BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 07-U02 06-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117004-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 07 06 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1É 1966 07 06 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1É Í«30Oju i I Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council PUBLIC HEARINGS It was the time and place fixed for the continuation of a public hearing on a Short Form 1911 Act for curbs, gutters and sidewalk on the west side of La Rica Avenue between Ramona Boulevard and Baldwin Park Boulevard. City Attorney Flandrick stated there was an additional recommendation from the Engineering Department suggesting that the Council overrule the protests providing that the City construct curbs as opposed to requiring the property owners on the two protesting parcels to do so. As there was no testimony in behalf of or in opposition, Mayor pro tern Morehead declared the public hearing closed. Assistant City Engineer Fogle explained there was existing curb there which was not at proper grade and in the proper location put in to County standards; that it was necessary to remove this curb and install new curbing in the proper location and elevation; that it was not legally the responsibility of the property owner to replace that curb; but they were responsible for sidewalk and concrete drive approach; that in front of Mrs. Isabel L. Christie's property at 3955 La Rica Avenue the sidewalk could go adjacent to the structure. July 6, 1966 Page 13 PUBLIC HEARING SHORT FORM 1911 ACT CONT'D FROM JUNE 15, 1966) CGS W SIDE LA RICA AVE. BETWEEN RAMONA BLVD. AND B.PK. BLVD. 66-S-17) PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED RESOLUTION NO. 66-162 MAKING FINDINGS AND RES. NO. 66-162 OVERRULING PROTESTS AND OBJECTIONS AND MAKING FINDINGS AND ORDERING THE SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS OF OVERRULING PROTESTS THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK TO CONSTRUCT AND OBJECTIONS AND SIDEWALKS AND DRIVEWAY APPROACHES IN ORDERING THE SUPT. OF ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK STS. OF CITY OF B.PK. STANDARD PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS CON- TO CONSTRUCT SIDEWALKS FORMING WITH EXISTING SIDEWALKS AND DRIVEWAY AND DRIVEWAY APPROACHES APPROACHES CONSTRUCTED UPON THEM FACING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE WEST SIDE OF LA RICA AVENUE BETWEEN CITY OF B.PK. STAND- RAMONA BOULEVARD AND BALDWIN PARK BOULEVARD ARD PLANS AND SPECS CONFORMING WITH EXIST- ING SIDEWALKS AND DRIVEWAY APPROACHES CONSTRUCTED UPON THEM FACING W SIDE OF LA RICA AVE. BETWEEN RAMONA BLVD. AND B.PK. BLVD. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 66-162 RES. NO. 66-162 BE ADOPTED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN ADOPTED ADAIR SECONDED. Roll Call. There were no objections, the motion carried. 00- It was the time and place fixed for the continuation of PUBLIC HEARING a public hearing on N-30, to determine whether certain premises, and buildings and structures constitute a N-30, CONTINUED public nuisance at 3139 Marlinda Avenue. FROM MAY 4, 1966) 3139 Marlinda Ave. City Attorney Flandrick stated he had had a conference with the property owner, Mr. Fanders, prior to the meeting; that Mr. Fanders had agreed that the premises and property constituted a nuisance and that.he agreed ith the staff recommendation that the nuisance be Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 07-U02 06-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117004-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 07 06 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1ÉÍ«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council abated within 60 days. Mr. A. L. Fenders, 3139 N. Marlinda, Baldwin Park, con- firmed the City Attorney's statement and agreed to abate the nuisance within 60 days. As there was no further testimony, Mayor pro tem More- head declared the public hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 66-178 FINDING AND DETERMINING THE EXISTENCE OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING THE SAME ABATED N-30) July 6, 1966 Page 14 A. L. FANDERS, 3139 N. Marlinda, B.Pk. PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED N-30 RES. NO. 66-178 FINDING AND DETER- MINING THE EXISTENC OF A PUBLIC NUISANCL AND ORDERING THE SAME ABATED N-30) 60 DAYS TO ABATE COUNCILMAN ADAIR MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 66-178 BE ADOPTED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY SECONDED. Roll Call. There were no objections, the motion carried. 00- It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on-CP-77, an appeal from decision of Board of Zoning Adjustments, an sppiication submitted by L. Richey, for s Conditional! Use Permit pursuant to the Baldwin Park City Council Resolution No. 64-187, to allow the construction and maintenance of a dog kennel upon a parcel of land located at 5111 Bleecker Street, in the M-I light manufacturing) Zone. Proper publication, postings and mailings had been accomplished. City Attorney Flandrick stated there was a letter on this matter from the attorney for the apparent owner of the property; that they apparently do not wish this permit to be granted; that he suggested that the Council continue this matter to the next regular meeting so that the position of the owner could be clarified. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT CP-.77 BE HELD OVER TO THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING JULY 20, 1966). COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. Roll Call. There were no objections, the motion carried, 00- It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on ZV-158, an appeal from decision of Board of Zoning Adjustments, an application submitted by Roccie Schavoni, for a Zone Variance to vary with the Baldwin Park Zoning Ordinance No. 357, Section 9611, subsection A..(3), to develop less than an acre of land in the C--2-A heavy commercial, I acre minimum) Zone, upon a parcel of land located at 3090 Maine Avenue. Continued) RES. NO. 66-178 ADOPTED CP-77, APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BZA REQUEST TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF DOG KENNEL AT 5111 BLEECKER ST., IN M-1 ZONE, L. RICHEY PUBLICATION, POSTINGS, MAILINGS LETTER FROM ATTY. FOR OY!>NER RE NOT WISHING PERMIT TO BE GRANTED HELD OVER TO JULY 20, 1966 PUBLIC HEARING ZV-158, REQUEST TO VARY WITH B.PK. ZONING ORD. NO. 357, SECTION 9611, SUB- SECTION A-(3), TO DEVELOP LESS THAN AN ACRE OF LAND IN C-2-A HEAVY COMMERCIAL, I ACRE M I N IMF) ZONE AT 3090 MAINE AVE., ROCCIE SCHAVONI BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 07-U02 06-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117004-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 07 06 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1ÉÍ«300Sr Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council July 6, 1966 Page 15 Proper publication, postings and mailings had been PUBLICATION, POSTINGS, accomplished. MAILINGS Planning Director Chivetta presented a resume stating RESUME the Board of Zoning Adjustments had adopted Resolution No. BZA 6625 on June 8, 1966, approving the request. He pointed out the map on the wall showing the plot plan approved by the Board of Zoning Adjustments. He stated it was the staff recommendation the Council concur with the Board of Zoning Adjustments. TESTIMONY IN BEHALF OF THE REQUEST WAS CALLED FOR BY TESTIMONY IN BEHALF MAYOR PRO TEM MOREHEAD. W R. J. Schavoni, 12012 Lower Azusa Road, El Monte, R. J. SCHAVONI, stated he was purchasing the property; that the Administrator" 12012 Lower Azusa stated that the gentleman who owned the adjacent property Rd., El Monte who proposed a building as of last September wanted to exercise his proposal; that they gave him six 6) months to make improvements on the piece that he was intending to purchase; that he did not know whether he had made any improvements or not on his; that it did not look like it. Planning Director Chivetta stated there was a case, ZV®127, that was active; that he had exercised the conditions of the resolution by raising the structure and clearing the land in preparation for construction; that he was waiting the outcome of this hearing before pro- ceeding, City Attorney Flandrick stated one of the conditions of approval by the Board in granting the variance was that all buildings and structures be removed or destroyed; that he had done this and therefore had exercised rights under the variance and therefore it was a valid variance; that it could not be terminated as such except by public hearing. Mr. David Gilman, 9040 East Huntington Drive, San Gabriel, DAVID GILMAN, stated he had handled this potential sale for Mr. Schavoni; 9040 E. Huntington that Mr. Schavoni was not acquiring the property for Dr., San Gabriel speculative purposes. TESTIMONY IN OPPOSITION TO THE REQUEST WAS CALLED FOR BY TESTIMONY IN MAYOR PRO TEM MOREHEAD. OPPOSITION Mrs. Benefel, 3077 North Maine, Baldwin Park, stated she, MRS. BENEFEL, was against this drivein; that down the street toward 3077 N. Maine, B,Pk. the freeway there was ban in and out hamburg(Zr- place; that up the other way was an ice cream drive«in; that she fekt this would be another 3mal G development; that there were twenty some acres that could be put to very good use as a big development which she thought would help the City of Baldwin Park; that the City had all of the small developments it needed. In rebuttal Mr. Scha,~voni stated he thought he had the same right as a big businessman, TESTIMONY IN BEHALF OF THE REQUEST WAS, CALLED FOR BY TESTIMONY IN BEHALF MAYOR PRO TEM MOREHEAD. Mr. Venagone, 1343 Highland Oaks Drive, Arcadia, stated MR. VENAGONE, he had an interest in the project; that they would develop 1343 Highland Oaks immediately, Dr., Arcadia Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 07-U02 06-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117004-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 07 06 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1ÉÍ«3' Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council July 6, 1966 Page 16 TESTIMONY IN OPPOSITION TO THE REQUEST WAS CALLED FOR BY TESTIMONY IN MAYOR PRO TEM MOREHEAD. OPPOSITION Mrs. Benefel stated she did not state she was for or against any size businessman; that she was for the City of Baldwin Park. As there was no one else in the audience desiring to speak PUBLIC HEARING either in behalf of or in opposition to ZV-158, Mayor pro DECLARED CLOSED tem Morehead declared the public hearing closed. ZV-158 Councilwoman Gregory stated she realized the Council had appealed the decision of the Board of Zoning Adjustments; that this was to reaffirm the work of the Planning Commission in setting out the C-2-A property in this area and to stop the infringment of the cutting up of this property into small parcels; that she did not realize at that time that this was a corner property; that certainly when a large concern came Into an area there was always the corner that became a service station or something else; that in stopping this development she wondered if it would have any noticeable affect on the rest of the property; that because it was a corner lot she thought perhaps the Council should not disallow this application, but she certainly thought in view of the other properties Involved in the C-2-A zone that some consideration should be given to maintain It for larger development that might come In. Councilman Morehead stated it was also his understanding that there was no other variance in this area that was active. in answer to a question by Councilman Morehead, Planning Director Chivetta stated the entire area now zoned C-2-A had been referred to the Planning Commission for study; that there would be a public hearing on this matter before the Planning Commission on July 27, 1966. MAYOR PRO TEM MOREHEAD MOVED THAT ZV-158 BE HELD UNTIL THE COUNCIL HEARD FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION REGARDING C-2-A ZONING) Further discussion followed. Councilwoman Gregory asked, legally what did the City owe the applicants From ZV-127 and ZV-l58) City Attorney Flandrick stated the action of the Board with respect to this particular case was vacated by reason of the appeal; that the final decision would have to be made by the City Council; that it was his understanding the applicant had exercised rights under ZV-127 and it was a valid variance. Further discussion followed wherein City Attorney Flandrick stated this matter could be held under submission for any reasonable length of time. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. Roll call, there were no MOTION CARRIED THAT objections, the motion carried. ZV-158 BE HELD UNTIL COUNCIL HEARD FROM P.C. RE C-2 A ZONING) 00- BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 07-U02 06-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117004-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 07 06 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1ÉÍ«3001 I Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on SP-2, proposed Street Name Change, Walnut Place, located on the west side of Walnut Street north of Los Angeles Street and south of Olive Street, to be renamed Benwood Street. Proper publication, postings and mailings had been accomplished. Planning Director Chivetta presented a resume stating it was the staff recommendation that the Council concur with the Planning Coimission's recommendation that Walnut Place be renamed Benwood Street. TESTIMONY IN BEHALF OF THE STREET NAME CHANGE WAS CALLED FOR BY MAYOR PRO TEJM MOREHEAD. Mr. Gus Nesseth, 14539 North Center, Baldwin Park, asked if the people in Tract No. 23550 had been notified of the street name change. Planning Director Chivetta stated there had been proper notification as required by State law. Mr. Nesseth stated they were the builders and had no objection to the street name change. As there was no one else in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition,to SP-2 Mayor pro tem Morehead declared the public hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 66-i79 RENAMING WALNUT PLACE TO BENW00D STREET CASE NO. SP-2) COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 66-179 BE ADOPTED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. Roll call, there were no objections, so ordered. In answer to a question by Mayor pro tem Morehead, City Attorney Flandrlck stated the change would take effect immediately, however a time limitation, possibly six mcnths, could be put on it, 00- It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on SP-j, amendment to the compreheri ive General Plan, Community Design Study., for the City of Baldwin Park. Street circulation for the block bounded on the south by Los Angeles Street, on the west by Walnut Street, on the north by Olive Street and on the east by Merced Avenue July 6, 1966 Page 17 PUBLIC HEARING SP-2 STREET NAME CHANGE WALNUT PLACE TO BENWOOD STREET PUBLICATION, POSTINGS, MAILINGS RESUME TESTIMONY IN BEHALF GUS NESSETH, 14539 N. Center, B.Pk. PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED RES. NO. 66-179 RES. NO. 66-179 ADOPTED SP 3, AMENDMENT TO COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN, CCMMINITY DESIGN STUDY STREET CIRr.ULATION FOR BLOCK BOUNDED ON SOUTH BY L.A. ST., ON WEST BY WALNUT ST. ON NORTH BY OLIVE ST. AND ON EAST BY MERCED AVE. Proper publication, postings and mailings had been accomplished. Continued) PUBLICATION, POSTINGS, MAILINGS BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 07-U02 06-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117004-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 07 06 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1ÉÍ«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council July 6, 1966 Page 18 Planning Director Chivetta presented a resume stating it was the staff recommendation that the Council concur with the Planning Commission's recommendation and adopt the proposed amendment. TESTIMONY IN OPPOSITION WAS CALLED FOR BY MAYOR PRO TEM TESTIMONY IN OPPOSITION MOREHEAD. Mr. Ted Riggs, 19560 Navilla Place, Covina, stated he TED RIGGS, owned property at i453 North Merced, Baldwin Park; that 19560 Navilla PI., the rear of his property would be the west side of the Covina proposed cul-de-sac; that he was in opposition or possibly he misunderstood; that he was concerned about the existing water meters and lines on the rear of the property and who would be required to pay for the relocation of these. City Attorney Flandrick stated there would be no change in the street pattern, that this was merely an amendment to the Master Plan; that nothing would take place until such time as there was a redevelopment of that area or an assessment district initiated by the property owners or if the Council wished to expend General Funds some time in the future pro put the street through; that there was no change, as such, physically required or made necessary by reason of this amendment. Mr. Riggs stated If ultimately the property owners were going to be liable he would be very strongly opposed whereas if the City were to take title to this property and assume any liability for any damage claim this was different. He stated he could not see the reason for the cul-de-sac and asked why they did not run a 60 foot street straight through to Los Angeles Street. Assistant City Engineer Fogle stated the street that came out onto Merced was adequate to carry traffic only for the houses that front on it; that to extend this street would mean destroying at least one house and possibly two; that this had been a matter under study. Mr. Shelby Walter, 1583 North Merced, Baldwin Park, SHELBY WALTER, questioned the present Master Plan and the proposed 4583 N. Merced, change. B.Pk. Extensive discussion, followed wherein Mr. Walter stated he owned Lot L1.03; that he could not get a lot split approved; that if was undedicated street and he was told it could not be deli ated because the original opening off of Merced Averue was not wide enough to fit the standards of the City bt thn pressen t time. He asked if he wanted to get s lot i:pl't would he have to develop from the origir i opening at Merced Avenue. City Attorney Flandrick stated this would have to be discussed with the City Engineer; that he could state that lot splits had been permitted in the past in this and other areas where the property owner had dedicated that portion of the property required for the street from his property and either improved or placed a deposit to cover the cost of such improvements. Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 07-U02 06-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117004-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 07 06 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1ÉÍ«I I R guiarr Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council A:s here was, no one else in the audience desiring to speak ether in behalf of or in opposition to SP-3, Mayor pro tem Morehead declared the public hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO0 66-180 APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN CCCRCULATION PLAN ELEMENT CASE NO. SF=,3) CODUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 66-180 BE ADOPTED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD S'ECONDED., Roil caIG there were no objections, so ordered. 00- AT' 9 45 P.M. MAYOR PRO TENS MOREHEAD MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCiL RECESS FOR TEN MINUTESO The motion died for lack of a second. 00- t was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on SP-4, amendment to the comprehensive General Plan, Ccmrnun i ty Design Study, for the City of Baldwin Park, Street'circulation for the block beunde d on the north by Ramona Boulevard, on the south by Salisbury Street., on the west by Barnes Avenue and on the east by Rhodes Lane, Proper pub J i cati on, postings and mailings had been accom- p1ished Planning Director Chivetta presented a resume stating It was the staff recommendation that the Council concur with the P l annd ng Commission°s recommendation and adopt Block Study D which would give the City the ultimate in circulation for the area at some future date when development is coqtemp i ated by i nd i v dui; l property owners or as a co-op ven t uure o TESTIMONY IN OPPOI<i~ vll h`"v F-4 WA;: CALLED FOR 6Y MAYOR PRO T EM MOREi-~EAD, Mr. Jam Rodir.e, 5327 N. Peck Road, El MMonte, stated he o-ay, repre.sentr"ng John Ce sal to at 12860 Ramona Boulevard; that he wa in favor of 6,11:::k udy 0 wi ih reservations; that the al ley took too muc' from the properties that front on R mona. He passed to the Council a copy of B to k Studd' 0 whi h he had red i ined for the Counci l as consideration. He further stated he believed the alley was, designed as a buffer between the properties on Ramona Boulevard and the residential properties to the south,- that he thought a masonry wall and a sixty 60) foot width of street B would serve the same purpose. Continued) July 6, 1966 Page 19 PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED SP 3 RES. NO. 66-180 RES. NO. 66-180 ADOPTED MOTION MADE MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF SECOND PUBLIC HEARING SP 4 AMENDMENT TO COMPREHEFSIVE GENERAL PLAN, COMMUNITY DESIGN STUDY STREET CIRCULATION FOR BLOCK BOUNDED ON NORTH BY RAMONA BLVD., ON SOUTH BY SALISBURY ST., ON WEST BY BARNES AVE. AND ON EAST BY RHODES LANE PUBLICATION, POSTINGS, MAILINGS RESUME TESTIMONY IN OPPOSITION JIM RODINE, 5327 N. Peck Rd. E l Monte BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 07-U02 06-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117004-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 07 06 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1ÉÍ«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council Mr. James Rogers, 12875 Salisbury, rear, Baldwin Park, stated he was not actually in opposition to the plan other than what it would do to his property; that he was told Street B" would come in behind him and would take twenty 20) feet of his property; that this would leave nineteen 19) feet from the house to the property line; that the way they stated the lots would be it would take thirty 30) feet of his property; that this would give him nine 9) feet from the house to the property line. City Attorney Flandrick stated the plan would not affect Mr. Rogers in any way; that if there would be a portion of Mr. Roger's property taken for a street It would not affect Mr. Rogers so that he would have to rebuild; that the sixty 60) foot overall right-of-way on Street 8" would be including sidewalks, parkways and so forth forty 40) feet curb face to curb face. Mr. Kirk Daniel, 12867 Salisbury, Baldwin Park, stated he had a City map that showed the first lot as 125 feet, 105 feet in the back, street 60 feet and in the back another 160 feet which added up to 450 feet; that this evening he had seen another map with different numbers which showed the back lot 170 feet. Planning Director Director Cht.vetta stated the map approved showed 125 feet for the first lot 115 for the second lot which would be 240 feet; that this would be after the street was in; that additional 10 or 20 feet was being taken which would make it 260. Mr. John F. Rhodes, 3642 N. Barnes, Baldwin Park, stated he was in opposition to the plan in its entirety; that he had bought a ranch there about 15 years ago for $25,000; that he had spent 15 years of hard labor and about $35,000 to $40,000; that to chop 100 feet off of the back and another 60 feet for a road would not leave very much profit. Planning Director Chivetta stated that the rear portion of Mr. Rhodes property would be affected by Street A", under the proposed amendment some 60 by 132 feet; that the existing General Plan would take a lot 60 by 400. Mr. Alvin Ahlers, 12845 Salisbury, Baldwin Park, stated he did not go for the plan at all. He stated he could not see putting in paper" streets and then getting the zoning necessary for the development. Reverend M. J. Belly 12855 0alihury, Baldwin Park, stated of the various properties he thought perhaps a greater portion of his property would be taken; that this plan was considerably better than the other" but there was a general feeling that they could work together in developing perhaps a better plan or at least some modification to this one that would give better use of the land; that he was willing to make some sacrifices for the development of the property and for the City of Baldwin Park; that he would like at least to get out of the property what he had put in it. Mr. Ernie Hernandez, 3657 Rhodes Lane, Baldwin Park, asked what the present zoning was on Ramona Boulevard. July 6, 1966 Page 20 JAMES ROGERS, 12875 Salisbury, B.Pk. KIRK DANIEL, 12867 Salisbury, B.Pk. JOHN F. RHODES, 3642 N. Barnes, B.Pk. ALVIN AHLERS, 12845 Salisbury, B.Pk. REV. M. J. BELL, 12855 Salisbury, B.Pk. ERNIE HERNANDEZ, 3657 Rhodes Lane, B.Pk. Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 07-U02 06-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117004-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 07 06 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1ÉÍ«3 0 1 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council Planning Director Chivetta stated it was R-1 except for the corner of Rhodes Lane and Barnes which were C-2. Mr-. Hernandez asked if the amendment was made tonight Would the zoning be changed wherein Mayor pro tem ahead stated no. City Attorney Flandrick stated this amendment had no affect on zoning,, W,. Hernandez stated he was opposed to the mobile home park going in,, As there was no one else in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to SP-4, Mayor pro em Morehead declared the public hearing closed. In answer to a question by Councilwoman Gregory, Planning Director Chivetta stated this plan showed Salisbury to be continued through the Edison right-of-stay to connect in with the existing street to the east. RESOLUTION NO. 66-181 APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN SP-4) COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CONCUR W%'ITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND APPROVE BLOCK STUDY D; AND THAT RESOLUTION NO. 66-181 BE ADOPTED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY SECONDED. Roll Call. There were no objections, the motion carried. 00- It wws the time and place fixed for a public hearing on a Short Form 1911 Act for curbs and gutters on the southeast side of Depot Avenue between Jeremie Avenue and Central Avenue, Proper publication, postings and mailings had been accomplished. No written protests had been received. Assistant City Engineer Fogle stated over fifty percent n50%1 of the curbs and gutters were in. As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or, in opposition to this Short Form 1911 Act, Mayor pro tem Morehead declared the public hearing closed, RESOLUTION NO. 66-177 MAKING FINDINGS AND OVERRULING PROTESTS AND OBJECTIONS AND ORDERING THE SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK TO CONSTRUCT CURBS AND GUTTERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK STANDARD PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS CONFORMING WITH EXISTING CURBS AND Continued) July 6, 1966 Page 21 PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED SP-4 RES. NO. 66-181 APPROVING AMEND- MENT TO GENERAL PLAN SP-4) RES. NO. 66-181 ADOPTED APPROVING BLOCK STUDY D PUBLIC HEARING SHORT FOR M 1911 ACT CG ON SE SIDE OF DEPOT AVE. BETWEEN JEREMIE AVE. AND CENTRAL AVE. 66-S-21) PUBLICATION, POSTINGS, MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS RESUME PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED RES. NO. 66-177 MAKING FINDINGS AND OVERRULING PRO- TESTS AND OBJECTIONS AND ORDERING SUPT. OF STREETS OF CITY OF B,PK. TO CON- STRUCT C AND G IN Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 07-U02 06-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117004-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 07 06 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1ÉÍ«Regular Meeting'of the Baldwin Park City Council GUTTERS CONSTRUCTED UPON THEM FACING THE SOUTHEAST SIDE OF DEPOT AVENUE BETWEEN JEREMIE AVENUE AND CENTRAL AVENUE 66.5-21) COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 66-177 BE ADOPTED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. Roll Call. There were no objections, so ordered. 00- City Asst.lEngineer Fogle reviewed his report on the initiation of a Short Form 1911 Act for curbs, gutters and sidewalks on the northeast side of Pacific Avenue between Puente Avenue and Big Dalton Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 66-174 DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO CAUSE THE CONSTRUCTION OF CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK PURSUANT TO THE PROVISION OF SECTION 5870 ET SEQ OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 66-174 BE ADOPTED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. Roll Cali. There were no objections, the motion carried. 00- City AsstjEngineer Fogle reviewed his report on the initiation of a Short Form 1911 Act for sidewalks on the northeast side of Foster Avenue between Frazier Street and Sparland Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 66-175 DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO CAUSE THE CONSTRUCTION OF SIDEWALK PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 5870 ET SEQ OF THE STREETS AND HIGIVIAYS CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNCILMAN ADAIR MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 66-175 BE ADOPTED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY SECONDED. Roll Call. There were no objections, the motion carried. 00- City Asst./Engineer Fogle stated that Mr. Levin's Tract No. 29417 had been completed with the exception of the storm drain between Grace Avenue and Adour Lane; that Mr. Benson had concurred with the street pattern and construction had Continued) July 6, 1966 Peg. 22 IN ACCORDMICE WITH CITY OF B.PK. STMT.. DARD PLANS AND SPECS. CONFORMING WITH EXISTING C AND 9 CONSTRUCTED UPON Twat**** FACING SE SIDE OF DEPOT AVE. BETWEEN JEREMIE AVE. AND CENTRAL AVE, J"-,S-2 RES. NO. 66-177 ADOPTED INITIATION OF SHORT FORM 1911 ACT NE SIDE PACIFIC AVE. BETWEEN PUENTE AVE. AND BIG DALTON AVE. RES. NO. 66.176 DECLARING ITS INTENT. TO CAUSE CONSTRUCTION OF COS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 5870 ET SEQ OF THE STS. AND M1 YS CODE OF STATE F CALIF. S"t RES. NO. 66.174 ADOPTED P H. AUG. S, 1966 INITIATION OF SHORT FORM 1911 ACT NE SIDE FOSTER AVE. BETWEEN FRAZIER ST. AND SPARLAND AVE, RES. NO. 66.175 DECLARING INTENT. TO. CAUSE CONSTRUCTIO OF SIDEWALK PURSUANT TO PROVISIONS OF SECTION 5070 ET SEQ Or STS. AND H IGFWAYS CODE OF STATE OF CALIF. RES. NO. 66-175 ADOPTED P.H. AUG. 3, 1966 TRACT NO. 29417 N. LEVIN BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 07-U02 06-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117004-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 07 06 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1ÉÍ«301 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council begun on Grace Avenue extension. He recommended that the bonding requirement be reduced to $700.00 the storm drain cost. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT THE COUNCIL CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY ENGINEER AND REDUCE THE BOND TO $700.00. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. Roil Call. There were no objections, the motion carried. City Asst./Engineer Fogle stated that bids for construction of curb and gutter and sidewalk had been opened oh July I, 1966. He recommended that the bid be awarded to Peak Construction Company, Covina, California, the low bidder in accordance with the specifications; that their bid on proposal No. 11 was $16,885.00. He stated the actual amounts would depend upon the work accomplished. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT THE COUNCIL CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY ENGINEER, THAT THE AWARD BE MADE TO PEAK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY IN THE SUM OF $16,885.00. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. Roll Call. There were no objections, the motion carried. 00- ORDINANCE NO. 458 ADDING SECTION 3101 TO THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE FIRE CODE COUNC I LWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT FURTHER READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 458 BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. Roll Call. There were no objections, the motion carried. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 458 BE ADOPTED. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. Roll Call. There were no objections, the motion carried. 00- Councilwoman Gregory stated that the July 4th celebration had been a success; that there had been fine attendance in the park; that the fireworks display was exceptional; that the programs had been coordinated by the Junior Chamber of Commerce, the Chamber of Commerce and the Police Department; that Officer Jim Flavin should be commended for his efforts with a certificate of some type of award; and that the school should be thanked for the use of the athletic field and their maintenance men. Discussion followed that an estimated nine to ten thousand people had viewed the fireworks display. 00m Councilwoman Gregory explained that the Sixth Annual Seminar of Independent Cities of Los Angeles County would be held in San Diego on September 23, 24 and 25th. She asked for Council's authorization to attond as Mr. John P. Kearney, Seminar Chairman had designated her Continued) July 6, 1966 Page 23 MOTION MADE AND CARRIED THAT COUNCIL CONCUR WITH REC. OF CITY ENGR. AND REDUCE THE BOND TO $700.00 BIDS CONSTRUCTION OF CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK MOTION MADE AND CARRIED THAT COUNCIL CONCUR WITH REC. OF CITY ENGR., THAT THE AWARD BE MADE TO PEAK CONSTRUCTION CO. IN THE SUM OF $16,885.00 ORD. NO. 458 ADDING SECT. 3101 TO B.P.M.C. RE FIRE CODE FURTHER READING OF ORD. NO. 458 WAIVED ORD. NO. 458 ADOPTED RE COMMENDATION JIM FLAVIN REQUEST BY COUNCIL- WOMAN GREGORY TO ATTEND SEMINAR OF INDEPENDENT CITIES OF L.A. CO. BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 07-U02 06-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117004-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 07 06 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1ÉÍ«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council as chairman of the Ladies Program Committee, stating that it was an honor to be selected. She stated that City Attorney Flandrick was in charge of programing. Councilwoman Gregory also requested authorization to attend The League of California Cities Annual Conference in San Diego, October 16 to 19, 1966. COUNCILMAN ADAIR MOVED THAT $150.00 BE APPROVED FOR COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY TO ATTEND THE INDEPENDENT CITIES SEMINAR IN SAN DIEGO, SEPTEMBER 23 TO 25. COUNCILMAN MORE- HEAD SECONDED. Roll Call. There were no objections, the motion carried. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT $150.00 BE APPROVED FOR COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY TO ATTEND THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES CONFERENCE IN SAN DIEGO, OCTOBER 16 TO 19. COUNCILMAN ADA I R SECONDED. Roll Call. There were no objections, the motion carried. Chief Administrative Officer Nordby suggested that anyone planning to attend the League Meeting in San Diego could let the City Clerk know so reservations could be made. 0.00- On the recommendation of the City Attorney, COUNCILMAN ADA I R MOVED THAT NUISANCE CASE N-4 BE DROPPED FROM THE AGENDA. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY SECONDED. There were no objections, the motion carried and was so ordered by Mayor pro tem Morehead. 00- Chief Administrative Officer Nordby requested Council approval for his attendance at the City Managers meeting; that there was a meeting in Anaheim and one in Berkeley; that both were scheduled for Thursday, July 25, 1966; that the expense was allowed in the budget. There were no objections. 00- RESOLUTION NO. 66a-175 ALLO'v'JING CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK COUNCILMAN ADAIR MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 66-175 BE APPROVED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNC I LWOMAN GREGORY SECONDED. Roll Call. There were no objections, the motion carried. July 6, 1966 Page 2)4 MOTION MADE AND CARRIED THAT $150.OC° BE APPROVED FOR COUNCILWOMAN GREGORN TO ATTEND THE INDE- PENDENT CITIES SEMINAR IN SAN DIEGO, SEPT. 23 TO 25 MOTION MADE AND CARRIED THAT $150.00 BE APPROVED FOR COUNC I LWOMAN GREGORY TO ATTEND THE LEAGUE OF CALIF. CITIES CONFERENCE IN SAN DIEGO, OCT. 16 TO 19 PUBLIC NUISANCE N-4 DROPPED FROM AGENDA C.A.O. REQ. COUNCIL APPROVAL FOR ATTEND- ANCE AT CITY MANAGERS MEETING, JULY 25, 1966 NO OBJECTIONS RES. NO. 66-175 CLMS. AND DEMANDS AGAINST CITY OF B.PK. RES. NO. 66-175 ADOPTED 00- BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 07-U02 06-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117004-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 07 06 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1ÉÍ«3%5 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Paitk City Council July 6, 1966 Page 25 AT 11:08 P.M. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAt m0'ED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADJOURN. COUNCILMAN ADA IR SECONDED. There were no objections, the motion carried and was so ordered by Mayor pro tem Morehead. AN. II:08 P.M. 00® THELMA L. BALKUS, CITY CLERK APPROVED C,ua 3 1966. Date of Distribution to City Council 1966. Date of Distribution to Departments,__ 1966. BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 07-U02 06-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117004-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 07 06 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1ÉÍ«REGULAR MEETING OF THE BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL JULY 6, 1966 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER) 14403 EAST PACIFIC AVENUE 7:30 P.M. I In accordance with Section 2703 of the Municipal Code the City Council met in open meeting at 7:00 p.m. in the Conference Room for an informal session with the staff to be informed on regular agenda items. The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park met in regular session at the above place at 7:30 p.m. Councilman Adair led the salute to the flag FLAG SALUTE Roll Call: Present: COUNCILMEN ADAIR AND GREGORY, ROLL CALL AND MAYOR PRO TEM MOREHEAD ABSENT: MAYOR MCCARON, COUNCILMAN CRITES, AND CITY ENGINEER FRENCH ALSO PRESENT: CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER NORDBY, CITY ATTORNEY FLANDRICK, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER FOGLE, BUILDING SUPERINTENDENT KALBFLEISCH, PLANNING DIRECTOR CHIVETTA, FINANCE DIRECTOR DUNCAN, AND CITY CLERK BALKUS CHIEF OF POLICE ADAMS ARRIVED AT 7:1x.3 P.M.) 00- CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARINGS CONTINUATION OF P.H. L. CP-77 Appeal from decision of Board of Zoning CONT'D TO Adjustments, An application submitted by L. JULY 20, 1966 Richey, for a Conditional Use Permit pursuant to the Baldwin Park City Council Resolution No. 64-187, to allow the construction and maintenance of a dog kennel upon a parcel of land located at 5111 Bleecker Street, in the M-I light manufacturing) Zone 00- At 11:08 P.M. Mayor pro tem MOREHEAD MOVED THAT THE CITY ADJ. AT 11:08 P.M. COUNCIL ADJOURN. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. There were no objections, the motion carried and was so ordered by Mayor pro tem Morehead. 00- I THELMA L. BALKUS, CITY CLERK BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 07-U02 06-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117004-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 Í«Regu n; Mes r dig o the i`3 dr n Pork City Counc i there had bee e mer;ionny in the district this would be slow p but if this youId be a way out would this be ancept b'.Je, R,ev%'is s3°eted they were perfect y wi I I ing to pay 4^ry p t of their f„ it share of the cost; that they had bor o'?Wed every cot they could that they nru d be gied to go into an a;sessment district. air, Nirho;son stated that it was being assumed that because of this one solo! that rher is was a low flow She irei; that X200 feet e4ti~ 000 g was a r i i ab- i n;; that t h^ was the very end of their system and hr pipe We leading to the n r°-al r ert home a tour 7 inch, that maybe is 10, houses Piy Way mould h. 1000 q r'oy that the OMy Y's Y m.Wc fir0q; supplier end the had been o_ e rP r 9:6 and at that time there r no re oy eeui°gmorr that WE- system was ayaoua for residential une. City Attorney F l tndr'ici stated as far as the determina- tion of the r e the Corer I I hid the authority to over- rule the cle,te-r nctlon of the Fire Chief or conditionally approve it or to opr ove it es made that the Council could require as a r.or r i t i otn, as Mr. Rev i s had suggested, that the company join in an assessment district if one was successful in Writing to roristr uct new lines, that this could be investigated is a possibility if the Council were to approve it no the I +` I; taw that the Coun I had ev i deoc: e from ii Navin end from the company indicating that there was some mr g of safety so he did not think the Council had any p' ii. rn to far as l iabi l ty was con- ed er d that Mr. Re's; i s had indicated they had no objectior to give to the City on indemnification should any injury or property damage incur; that the Council could condition its epp o.yai on that basis as well as the requirement that they par i rip_ to in any assessment district. He further stated he would pass on the moral aspect but as for a any legs! aspect was concerned he was sure they had irsuraece and if such an indemnification agree- ment would be required of them that they mould spend the add i i ona ii $300 a yee W no-assurance covering the City„ that the natation of rfr a the Council could do to upgrade h: 50101s; w vs pother problem; that it was w' etiaiiv.;: opiaisl TPA wi d it might be difficWt to i *' ate an a.. le:ssma'i r t Chief rrriel x'' the iofor cx. mp i es, h he rotiP 3uIy 20th re, Mr. Rev i s rv member would i i k: to give the i ore'" stated in view of l ry Yom h=? become qai.. the Council d::.fur act ion that he had talked with ire Wartment; that he 1 a report. C0UNC I V(),'14N GREGORY MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL TAKE THIS CASE 001C V-0) UNDER Sufism 1 SIGN UNTIL. THE NEZ T MEETING 9JULY 20, 196611. COUNCILMAN ADA I R SECONDED. ft o O Call l There were no objections, the motion carried. JuI'y 6s i966 Cage 12 POTION MADE AND CARRIED THAT COUNCIL TAKE THIS CASE LACFC V-11) UNDER SUBMISSION UNTIL NEXT MTG. JULY 20, $966) O0- BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 07-U02 06-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117004-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06