Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1966 08 03 CC MIN1966 08 03 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1ùÍ«3032 Unofficial Until Approved REGULAR MEETING OF THE BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 3, 1966 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER) 114.03 East Pacific Avenue 7:30 P.M. LI In accordance with Section 2703 of the Municipal Code the City Council met in open meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the Conference Room for an informal session with the staff to be informed on regular agenda items. The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park met in regular session at the above place at 7:30 P.M. Councilman Morehead led the salute to the flag. FLAG SALUTE Roll Call: Present: COUNCILMEN ADAIR, CRITES, GREGORY, MOREHEAD, AND MAYOR MCCARON Absent: CHIEF OF POLICE ADAMS Also Present: CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER NORDBY, CITY ATTORNEY FLANDRICK, CITY ENGINEER FRENCH, BUILDING SUPERINTENDENT KALBFLEISCH, PLANNING DIRECTOR CHIVETTA, FINANCE DIRECTOR DUNCAN, CAPTAIN OtLEARY, CITY TREASURER PUGH, AND CITY CLERK BALKUS 00- Councilwoman Gregory stated there was a duplication error in the June 16, 1966 minutes, page 5, line 15, tenth para- graph, that these two parks". City Clerk Balkus stated that engineering items on July 6th 1966 minutes, pages 22 and 23 should read Assistant City Engineer Fogle as Mr. French was not present. MOTION BY COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD THAT THE MINUTES OF JUNE 16, 1966 AND JULY 6, 1966, BE APPROVED AS CORRECTED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. There were no objections, the motion carried and was so ordered by Mayor McCaron. 00- City Clerk Balkus stated that Council had received a copy of a letter signed by residents residing on Benwood Street, formerly Walnut Place; that they were objecting to the name change; that individuals signing the letter were present. As Council said they would consider the matter at this time, Mr. Elmer E. Lilley, 13680 Walnut Place came forward stating the change was a costly inconvenience to five families, and why hadn't this been changed before. Mayor McCaron explained that the Planning Commission had held a public hearing and had recommended to the Council that the street name be changed to eliminate confusion and remove a conflict of Street names; that the street was in line with the continuation of Benwood St. through the city. City Clerk Balkus stated proper legal publication had been made for both the City Council and Planning Commission hearings; that the street would carry both names for approximately six months; that all jurisdictions, fire department, post office, etc. had been notified. Continued) ROLL CALL CORRECTION TO PAGE 5, JUNE 16, AND PAGES 22 & 23 JULY 6, 1966, MINUTES MINUTES OF JUNE 16 AND JULY 6, 1966 APPROVED ST. NAME CHANGE WALNUT PL. TO BENWOOD ST. ELMER E. LILLEY 13680 Walnut Place B.Pk. BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 08-U02 03-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117007-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 08 03 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1ùÍ«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council August 3, 1966 Page 2 Chief Administrative Officer Nordby explained that in an emergency a citizen is apt to make a hurried call, giving the number on Walnut and not specifying Street or Place and valuable time could be lost locating the correct address. Councilman Morehead proposed Mayor McCaron as repro- SCAG sentative and Councilwoman Gregory as alternate for MAYOR MCCARON REP. the Southern California Association of Governments COUNCILMAN CRITES General Assembly. As Councilwoman Gregory could not ALTERNATE attend, Councilman Crites was designated as the alternate. RESOLUTION 66-202 APPOINTING A REPRESENTATIVE RES. 66-202 AND ALTERNATE FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA APPOINTING REP. & ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS GENERAL ASSEMBLY ALTERNATE TO SCAG ADOPTED COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN ADAIR THAT RESOLUTION 66-202 BE APPROVED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. Roll Call, there were no objections, the motion carried. 00- As further discussion was requested concerning Benwood D. C. KINSER St. Mr. D. C. Kinser, 13632 Walnut Place, came forward RE: ST. NAME CHANGE asking if there would be a change inihe Resolution as WALNUT PL. TO requested; stating the chief objection was that they BENWOOD ST. had not been notified; that they did not read the legal notices; that it would be expensive for residents to print new business cards and checks and notify everyone of the name address change. After discussion by Council that new hearings would be DISCUSSION costly; that the hearings had been legally held; that there was approximately six months time to make the adjustment; that there were five homes involved which had been occupied about five months; and that the change would avoid future confusion, Mayor McCaron asked Mr. Kinser if he would be satisfied with a communication from Planning Director Chivetta giving the reasons for the recommendation and if not the Council might consider new hearings. Mr. Kinser agreed to accept a communication from the Planning Director. Mayor McCaron directed that the Planning Director send PLANNING DIR. a letter to Mr. Kinser setting forth the reasons for TO WRITE LETTER the name change. 00- The Council approved Chief Administrative Officer C.A.0. ANNUAL Nordby's request for Annual Leave on August 15 and LEAVE APPROVED 16, and September 1, through September 9, 1966. 00- Mr. Nordby reported that under Nuisance Abatement C.A.O. REPORT Ordinance No. 122 approximately 100 structures have RE: NUISANCE been removed; that many abatements had been voluntary; ABATEMENT that citizen cooperation has gained support and that the program will be stepped up during the next year. 00- City Engineer French reviewed his report on the Bids JERRY AVE. for the Jerry Avenue, 1911 Act Street Improvement, PROJ. 66-1 Project 66-1. He stated final right-of-way BID Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 08-U02 03-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117007-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 08 03 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1ùÍ«3,034 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council appraisals had been made; that the $75,286.45 estimate in the Resolution of Intention would not be exceeded; that there were good competetive bids; that the finan- cial opinion of the bond holder of the value of the area had affected the cost. He recommended that award be made to F. W. Richter Construction, in the amount of $51,575.20. MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN ADAIR THAT THE AWARD FOR JERRY AVENUE, PROJECT 66-I, BE MADE TO F. W. RICHTER CONSTRUCTION, 80 EAST MONTECITO, SIERRA MADRE, CALIFORNIA, IN THE AMOUNT OF $51,575.20. Roll Call, there were no objections, the motion carried. City Engineer French reviewed his report on the Bids for the construction of approximately 278 feet of 18 inch R. C. P. Storm Drain on Merced Avenue, a drain providing an outlet for drainage facilities being constructed as part of the Jerry Avenue 1911 Act District. He recommended that award be made to Robert E. Scholes for the low bid of $2,946.8o. MOTION BY COUNCILMAN CRITES, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD THAT AWARD BE MADE TO ROBERT E. SCHOLES, 8019 MAXINE STREET, PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE LOW BID OF $2,911.6.80 IN ACCORDANCE WITH HIS BID, AND THE BID GUARANTEE OF THE UNSUCCESSFUL BIDDERS BE RETURNED. 00- City Clerk Balkus administered the oath to those in the audience desiring to be heard during the meeting. 00- PUBLIC HEARINGS It was the time and place fixed for the public hearing on ZV-161, Appeal from decision of Board of Zoning Adjustments, An application submitted by Reneau Keith for a Zone Variance pursuant to the Baldwin Park Zoning Ordinance No, 357, Section 9551, subsection I to allow the construction and use of a duplex upon a parcel of land with an existing single family residence, in the R-I single family residential) Zone, upon a parcel of land located at 13931 Susquehanna Avenue. Proper publication, posting and mailings had been accomplished. Planning Director Chivetta presented a resume stating the Board of Zoning Adjustments had adopted Resolution No. B.ZA 66-32 on July'13, 1966 denying the request. He pointed out the plot plan on the wall map, stating it was the staff recommendation that Council concur with the Board of Zoning Adjustments. TESTIMONY IN BEHALF OF THE REQUEST WAS CALLED FOR BY MAYOR MCCARON. Mr. Gilbert Henderson, 17057 E. San Bernardino Road, Covina,. stated he was the proposed builder appearing for and with Mr. Keith, and they were asking for the Zone Variance on the basis that this is the only lot of that size facing the street that he is on; that the lot is 15,000 sq. ft., the adjoining lots are 50 x 50 at the outside; that the rear of the lot is surrounded by R-2 property and abuts a duplex at the rear; that at the Planning Commission hearing seven neighbors had testified to the advantages of having this property developed. Continued) August 3, 1966 Page 3 AWARDED TO F. W. RICHTER CONSTRUCTION $51,575.20 MERCED AVENUE STORM DRAIN BID AWARDED TO ROBERT E. SCHOLES $2,946.80 OATH ADMINISTERED PUBLIC HEARINGS 8:00 P.M. PUBLICATION POSTINGS, MAILINGS RESUME TESTIMONY IN BEHALF GILBERT HENDERSON, 17057 E. San Bernar- dino Road, Covina BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 08-U02 03-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117007-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 08 03 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1ùÍ«3 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council Mr. Earl Keith stated he and his wife were owners of the property; that this was a special situation being the largest lot in the block, the largest on Susquehanna; that the deepest part of the lot is 179 ft. and 80 ft. at the widest part; that the unused area requires care; that they would comply with all codes. OATH ADMINISTERED Milton Hadley, 14304 E. Ramona Blvd., Baldwin Park, attorney appeared for the petitioners, Mr. Keith and Mrs. Reneau stating he felt this was a reasonable type of request; that the petitioner had appeared at the Planning Commission and asked for proper procedured to apply for a duplex at the rear of this property. They were instructed to apply for a zone variance and it was discussed by the BZA that possibly this should have been a zone change. However, since they were told to apply for a variance this is what they had done. He stated R-2 development permits two single family dwellings or a duplex; that R-3 requires development be contained under one roof; that the petitioner would comply with all conditions, curbs, gutters, fences, etc.; that property to the rear and side is R-2; that this property was unique; that they were not seeking a zone change or spot zoning but were seeking to build a duplex on the rear portion of this 15,000 sq. ft. property; that a dwelling was presently on the front; that the rear 10,000 sq. ft. had no use what so ever and abuts and is adjacent to R-2 property; that they would build two units of two bedrooms with a divided three car garage between; that this would not interfere with property on Susquehanna. He stated it would be an extreme hardship if they were not allowed to build on the back of the property; that with council approval they could split off the back portion and sell to,adjacent R-2 owners; that this would improve the area that he understood the Planning Commission has presented a uniform plan for utilization of these large lots; however, it was necessary for them to proceed immediately therefore they had appealed to the Council. He asked that Council give the matter deep consideration. OATH ADMINISTERED Mr. M. C. Hunter, 3835 Stewart, Baldwin Park, stated he had R-l property in back of the Women's Club and he was in favor of the improvement which would clear the property of debris. Patricia Becker, 13937 Susquehanna Avenue, Baldwin Park, stated she was the neighbor to the south side of the property; that this development would be an improvement and clear the property of debris, bicycle parts, bottles, rocks; that the back of the lot was a problem with children going through it. Mrs. Mary Keith stated she was shocked to learn that the application had been turned down by the Board of Zoning Adjustments; that development would clean up and improve the area; that they had a petition in favor of the develop- ment signed by neighbors; that Mrs. Helen Nagard, 13925 Susquehanna Avenue, Baldwin Park, had expressed her approval at the previous hearing, however, she was unable to attend this evening; that she would appreciate council approval. In answer to a question by Councilman Morehead, Planning Director Chivetta explained the existing concrete driveway is eight feet in width and runs back to the even prolongation of the side line of the existing garage; that a lot split required a 10 ft. driveway. Continued) August 3, 1966 Page 4 OATH ADMINISTERED MILTON HADLEY, 14304 E. Ramona Blvd., B.Pk. ATTORNEY FOR PETITIONERS OATH ADMINISTERED M. C. HUNTER, 3835 Stewart, B.Pk. PATRICIA BECKER 13937 Susquehanna Ave., B.Pk. HELEN NAGARD, 13925 Susquehanna Ave., B.Pk. BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 08-U02 03-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117007-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 08 03 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1ùÍ«3036 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council August 3, 1966 Page 5 I I Mr. Gilbert Henderson stated their plan called for a minimum of ten feet and a turn around space of 25 feet, that actually It was a 29 foot turn around. In answer to Mayor McCaron's inquiry, Mr. Chivetta stated the applicant was aware of the deep lot study being made by the Planning Commission. City Attorney Flandrick stated the Planning Commission's recommendation by definition of a deep lot being a 170 foot of average depth and that he did not think this would qualify 161 feet on one side and 171 on the other, and 180 some odd feet at the deepest point. Planning Director Chivetta stated the actual depth was in excess of 170 feet, but in this case taking the center of the lot, and go up on 170; that something could be worked out with the applicant in this manner. As there was no further testimony either in behalf of PUBLIC HEARING or in opposition to ZV-161, Mayor McCaron declared the DECLARED CLOSED Public Hearing closed. ZV-16i Mayor McCaron stated it would appear that access to the property is in an R-I zone; the property is R-l; it is surrounded by R-I on both sides and the change in the code for an additional home on this deep lot would more or less make it fit in with the R-1 and it would appear that it would be alleviated because of the fact that it would have some additional use of the land but to put in R-2 development on the property even though it is backing up to R-2 property certainly doesn't qualify it for R-2 usage. He stated that in most of the testimony the neighbors would like to see anything go in there just to clear up the property. This can be readily seen, and this is one of the reasons for the change in the ordinance where a second home can be placed on a deep lot that cannot face another street or a new street put in to give it another frontage; that this may not be exactly what they do want but then it will be some relief, at least the improvement in the rear which will satisfy the neighbors also and it will clean up the property. Councilman Morehead stated he saw this a little bit differently than Mayor McCaron. Although he hadn't seen the final recommendation from Planning regarding our deep lot situation he had reason to believe that they have only considered one additional residence on a deep lot; that this caused him concern abed'what the people were going to do with the balance of their available property. Mayor McCaron commented that the City should try to avoid further development with several lots using the same driveway. Councilman Crites stated that under the present ordinance there was enough square footage for three 3) 5,000 square foot lots; that under the proposed ordinance the lot would only be short 120 square foot to make three 3) lots; that the interior proposed street was so far away from this property that they could not use it anyway; that in his opinion there was nothing else a person could do with this and maintain his ownership other than what had been requested. Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 08-U02 03-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117007-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 08 03 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1ùÍ«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council Mayor McCaron stated that this was tantamount to a zone change when R-2 uses were sandwiched in between R-I usage; that this lot was entitled to some relief but he thought one additional residence in the rear where It would remain one parcel under one ownership would provide the relief that would be necess'ar`y.-for1,'fihis size parcel. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL GRANT THE ZONE VARIANCE ZV-161) AS APPLIED FOR PROVIDING THAT AS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL THAT COMPLIANCE BE HAD WITH THE PLOT PLAN AS SUBMITTED IN TERMS OF CONSTRUCTION AND THAT IT BE MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLOT PLAN AND THAT THE ENTIRE PROPERTY REMAIN UNDER SINGLE OWNERSHIP. COUNCILMAN CRITES SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN MOREHEAD, CRITES, AND ADAIR NOES: COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY AND MAYOR MCCARON ABSENT: NONE RESOLUTION NO. 66-204 GRANTING A ZONE VARIANCE APPLICANT: R. KEITH, CASE NO. Zv-161) COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 66-204 BE ADOPTED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN CRITES SECONDED. City Attorney Flandrick stated the suggested conditions were two in number: compliance with the plot plan and remain under single ownership. He stated, of course, the applicant would have to comply with all other provisions of the Municipbl Code. Planning Director Chivetta stated there was no provision on the plot plan for a wall or fence. As no one had left the room and there were no objections, Mayor McCaron reopened the public hearing on ZV-161. Mr. Milton Hadley stated he was sure that the owner would comply with any of the conditions placed on the variance; that he felt it would be in order to have the Planning Department set forth the conditions they want and the owner would agree to them and sign them prior to taking out a permit for construction to build. City Attorney Flandrick suggested that perhaps Planning Director Chivetta could review the plot plan and come back later in the meeting with comments and suggested conditions. As there was no one else in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to ZV-161, Mayor McCaron declared the public hearing closed. With the consent of the second Councilman Morehead with- drew the motion. Re: Resolution No. 66-201.) 00- It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on a Short Form 1941 Act for curbs, gutters and sidewalks on the northeast side of Pacific Avenue between Puente Avenue and Big Dalton Avenue. Continued) August 3, 1966 Page 6 ZV-161 GRANTED AS APPLIED FOR PROVID- ING THAT AS A CONDI- TION OF APPROVAL THAT COMPLIANCE BE HAD WITH PLOT PLAN AS SUBMITTED IN TERMS OF CONSTRUCT TION AND THAT IT BE MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PLOT PLAN AND THAT ENTIRE PROPERTY REMAIN UNDER SINGLE OWNERSHIP RES. NO. 66-2011. GRANTING A ZONE VARIANCE APPLICANT: R. KEITH, CASE NO. ZV-161) PUBLIC HEARING REOPENED zv-16i PLAN. DIR. TO COME BACK LATER IN MTG. WITH SUGGESTED CONDITIONS PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED zv-16i MOTION WITHDRAWN PUBLIC HEARING SHORT FORM 1911 ACT CGS NE SIDE PACIFIC BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 08-U02 03-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117007-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 08 03 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1ùÍ« to Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council August 3, 1966 Page 7 AVE. BETWEEN PUENTE AVE. AND BIG DALTON AVE. 66-s-25) Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. POSTINGS, MAILINGS There were no written protests. NO WRITTEN PROTESTS City Engineer French stated over fifty percent 50%) of the curbs, gutters and sidewalks were in. As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to this Short Form 1911 Act, Mayor McCaron declared the public hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 66-194 MAKING FINDINGS AND OVERRULING PROTESTS AND OBJECTIONS AND ORDERING THE SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK TO CONSTRUCT CURBS, GUTTERS AND SIDEWALKS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK STANDARD PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS CONFORMING WITH EXISTING CURBS, GUTTERS AND SIDEWALKS CONSTRUCTED UPON THEM FACING THE NORTHEAST SIDE OF PACIFIC AVENUE BETWEEN PUENTE AVENUE AND BIG DALTON AVENUE. 66-s-25) COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 66-194 BE ADOPTED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. Roll Call. There were no objections, the motion carried. 00- It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on a Short Form 1911 Act for sidewalks on the northeast side of Foster Avenue between Frazier Street and Sparland Avenue. Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to this Short Form 1911 Act, Mayor McCaron declared the public hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 66-195 MAKING FINDINGS AND OVERRULING PROTESTS AND OBJECTIONS AND ORDERING THE SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK TO CONSTRUCT SIDEWALKS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK STANDARD PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS CONFORMING WITH EXISTING SIDEWALKS CONSTRUCTED UPON THEM FACING THE NORTHEAST SIDE OF FOSTER AVENUE BETWEEN FRAZIER STREET AND SPARLAND AVENUE. 66-s-26) PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED RES. NO. 66-194 MAKING FINDINGS AND OVERRULING PROTESTS AND OBJ. AND ORD. SUPERINTENDENT OF STS. OF CTY. OF B.PK. TO CONST. CGS IN ACCORD. WITH CTY. OF B.PK. STAND. PLANS AND SPEC. CONFORMING WITH EXISTING CGS CONST. UPON THEM FACING NE SIDE PACIFIC AVE. BETWEEN PUENTE AVE. AND BIG DALTON AVE. 66-s-25) RES. NO. 66-194 ADOPTED PUBLIC HEARING SHORT FORM 1911 ACT S NE SIDE FOSTER AVE. BETWEEN FRAZIER ST. AND SPARLAND AVE. 66-s-26) POSTINGS, MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED RES. NO. 66-195 MAKING FINDINGS AND OVERRULING PROTESTS AND OBJ. AND ORD. SUPT. OF STS. OF THE CTY. OF B.PK. TO CONST. SDWLKS. IN ACCORD. WITH THE CTY. OF B.PK. STAND. PLANS AND SPEC. CON- FORMING WITH EXISTING SDWLKS. CONST. UPON THEM FACING NE SIDE FOSTER AVE. BETWEEN FRAZIER ST. AND SPAR- LAND AVE. 66-s-26) Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 08-U02 03-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117007-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 08 03 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1ùÍ«30,,19 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council August 3, 1966 Page 8 COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 66-195 RES. NO. 66-195 BE ADOPTED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN ADOPTED CRITES SECONDED. Roll Call. There were no objections, the motion carried. 00- It was the time and place for a public hearing on Changes in Rule XIV, Section 230 of the Personnel Rules and Regulations. PUBLIC HEARING CHANGES IN RULE XIV, SECTION 230, PERSONNEL RULES AND REGULATIONS Proper publication, postings and mailings had been PUBLICATION, accomplished. POSTINGS, MAILINGS City Attorney Flandrick stated this was a public hearing on proposed changes1h the Personnel Rules and Regula- tions as recommended by the Personnel Board; that the Personnel Board had conducted a hearing on this matter; that the Council had before them a memorandum from the City Clerk that adequately and completely outlined the proposed changes; that the City Council also had before them a copy of the proposed resolution making these changes. He stated that it was his recommendation that the Council did not follow the Board's comments concerning the matter of new evidence; that the point being that this type of proceeding was similar in most cases to a judicial proceeding and where you have your day in court you are not permitted to come up before an Appellate Court and present new evidence unless it was newly dis- covered evidence and a rather complicated proceeding was involved; that in most cases where an employee was going to appeal he would have an attorney and hopefully the attorney would present all the evidence relevant to the proceeding; that the City Clerk had estimated the cost of transcripts; that it might seem a little high and he was sure it was; that the City of Los Angeles and the County of Los Angeles for years had followed the procedure that if a verbatim transcript and thus an appeal was taken from the body hearing matter the cost of the transcript was borne by the applicant; that this was true in cases of personnel matters before the County of Los Angeles and zoning matters before the County of Los Angeles, Regional Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors; that a number of cities had gone to this method for the very simple reason that it was a cost to the City to have to do this transcription such as the City Clerk was doing for the recent appeal case; that since the party involved was taking the appeal it would seem-reasonable to impose:Chet charge upon him and that was the Board's recommendation as well as his. As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak either PUBLIC HEARING in behalf of or In opposition to the proposed changes in the DECLARED CLOSED Personnel Rules and Regulations, Mayor McCaron declared the public hearing closed. Councilwoman Gregory stated she was concerned about the cost of the transcript; that it seemed If the Council were to accept this revision that the cost factor alone would determine that the employee would have to forfeit his right to appeal to the City Council; that she was very sorry that none of the employees had come forward; that she thought that in addition to posting, notices should have been mailed to the President of the Employees Association; that she agreed I Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 08-U02 03-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117007-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 08 03 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1ù Í«3040 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council August 3, 1966 Page 9 that the court recorder would be a help but she wondered how an employee would pay for that; that she thought perhaps new t`ulings would be needed as far as the Board was concerned in presenting the testimony and the employee would be warned of the cost that could be entailed in an appeal; that she thought more study was needed and suggested that the Employees Association be very sure that they had a voice in this matter. Mayor McCaron stated basically the change as pro- posed was to alleviate the problem of having two hearings; that the City had a very well qualified Personnel Board; that the employee had to go through two people before an action was effective and then to go through the Board he thought was very adequate protection; that it would still allow the City to pay the cost of the appeal. Councilwoman Gregory stated some cities allowed the Personnel Board's decision to become final, but most cities had the right to appeal to the Council; that by making the Board's word final the Council would be forcing unionization. Discussion followed that there had been no response from the Employees Association regarding this matter either before Council or the Personnel Board. Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated he saw no problem in holding the matter over to get representa- tion from the employees. As there were no objections, Mayor McCaron reopened PUBLIC HEARING the public hearing. REOPENED COUNCILMAN CRITES MOVED THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING BE PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED TO THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 17, 1966). CONTINUED TO COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD SECONDED. There were no objections, AUGUST 17, 1966 the motion carried. 00- Regarding ZV-161, Planning Director Chivetta stated there zv-161 would be four conditions: I) To provide one additional off street parking space and paved driveway access in accordance with the Baldwin Park Municipal Code in a garage on the subject property; 2) To dedicate for street purposes and install all improvements therein i.e. curbs, gutters sidewalks, etc.) to City specifications; 3) To install a solid view obscuring fence or wall six 6) feet in height along the right side property line as delineated in green on Exhibit A"; 4) To provide an interior walkway from the front property line to the rear units, a raised concrete walkway thirty 30) inches wide by three 3) inches in height. He stated that the applicant had agreed to these conditions. In answer to a question by Mayor McCaron, Planning Director Chivetta stated that grading would automatically be taken care of. In answer to a question by Councilman Morehead, City Attorney Flandrick stated he concurred with these conditions in addition to the two others as stated previously, in compliance with the plot plan and the entire property under singFe ownership. Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 08-U02 03-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117007-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 08 03 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1ù Í«4,941 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 66-201. BE ADOPTED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN CRITES SECONDED. For clarification, City Attorney Flandrick stated there were six 6) conditions: 1) Compliance with the plot plan; 2) Entire parcel remain under single ownership; 3) Total of four 4) off street parking spaces all in garages; 4) a view obscuring fence as shown on the plot plan; 5) Walkway as shown on the plot plan; and 6) Dedication as described by the Planner. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN MOREHEAD, CRITES AND ADAIR NOES: COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY AND MAYOR MCCARON ABSENT: NONE 00- City Engineer French reviewed his report on the Maintenance Agreement with the State Division of Highways for the maintenance of State Highways within the City of Baldwin Park stating that the only State Highway within the City presently was the San Bernardino Freeway. He recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 66-197. RESOLUTION No. 66-197 APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE OF STATE HIGHWAY IN'THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 66-197 BE ADOPTED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. Roll Call. There were no objections, the motion carried. 00- City Engineer French reviewed his report on the agreement with Lampman and Associates stating this was prepared in accordance with the Council's instructions; that the agreement provided for the design service. He recommended that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign in behalf of the City. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED ON THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY ENGINEER THAT THE AGREEMENT WITH LAMPMAN AND ASSOCIATES FOR THE DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE CORE AREA STREET REDEVELOPMENT BE NEGOTIATED MAYOR AND CITY CLERK AUTHORIZED TO SIGN). COUNCILMAN CRITES SECONDED. Roll Call. There were no objections, the motion carried. 00- City Engineer French reviewed his report on the main line sewer extension to serve presently unsewered areas stating this concerned the completion of main line sewer extensions within the City of Baldwin Park and a method of obtaining sewer service to a few small areas within the City; that a majority of these areas were south of the freeway but there was a problem regarding interior streets developing on a piecemeal basis and furnishing sewer service to them. August 3, 1966 Page 10 RES. NO. 66-201. ADOPTED SIX 6) CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL MAINTENANCE AGREE- MENT STATE DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS RES. NO. 66-197 APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR MAINT. OF ST. HIWY. IN CTY. OF B.PK. RES. NO. 66-197 ADOPTED AGREEMENT LAMPMAN AND ASSOCIATES DESIGN SERVICE FOR CORE AREA REDEVELOP- MENT AND STUDIES NEC. FOR OBTAINING RIGHT-OF-WAY RAMONA BLVD. DOWN- TOWN AREA APPROVED Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 08-U02 03-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117007-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 08 03 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1ù Í«T;. 42 I Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council Mayor McCaron asked if the plus one-half cent per square foot for areas greater than 150 feet from the street" was mostly for future streets. City Engineer French stated no. Mayor McCaron asked if there was to be development on R-I frontage why would this be added on. City Engineer French stated the actual cost as proposed was an average cost based upon what the people have paid for sewer construction in the sewer districts within the City; that these costs were averaged out with the three districts; that Merced and Frazier also had some properties that would be affected by this. Mayor McCaron asked if it had been taken into consideration that the costs would be greater on a small job. City Engineer French stated the indication was that over a long haul" this would provide the funds to construct sewers; that it would not take care of inequities. In answer to a question by Councilman Crites, City Engineer French stated where anyone had paid any assessment for sewers would not be charged twice. RESOLUTION NO. 66-205 ADOPTING A SCHEDULE OF SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 66-205 BE ADOPTED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN CRITES SECONDED. In answer to a question by Councilman Morehead, City Attorney Flandrick explained that the resolution covered only Item I of the City Engineer's recommendation setting the cost for the construction of these lines; that the City Engineer was asking in addition that the Council accept his recommendation as set forth in Item 2, page 2 of his memorandum. Policy) Roll Call. There were no objections, the motion carried. Note: Later in the meeting Councilman Morehead indicated he wanted his vote changed to no" on Resolution No. 66-205. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT THE POLICY CITY ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATION DATED AUGUST 3, 1966, ADDRESSED TO THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER). COUNCILMAN CRITES SECONDED. There were no objections, the motion carried. 00- City Engineer French reviewed his report on the procedure for upgrading street lights within the City. He requested that the Council take two actions: I) Establish a policy regarding the use of existing wood poles; and 2) That all additional lights initiated on the part of property owners would require a petition. He stated that ornamental poles would require zoning the district and have hearings for supplemental assessments; that these should have petitions. Continued) August 3, 1966 Page II RES. NO. 66-205 ADOPTING A SCHE- DULE OF SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES RES. NO. 66-205 ADOP TED NO" VOTE BY COUNCILMAN MORE- HEAD ON RES. NO. 66-205 ADOPTED CITY ENGINEER'S REC. DATED AUG. 3, 1966, ADDRESSED TO C.A.O. RE MAIN LINE SEWER EXTENSION TO SERVE PRESENTLY UNSERVED AREAS) PROCEDURE FOR UP- GRADING STREET LIGHTS WITHIN CITY BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 08-U02 03-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117007-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 08 03 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1ù 1966 08 03 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1ù Í«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council City Engineer French stated it was originally set up to obtain intersection lighting and mid block lighting throughout the City, take over the County Lighting District and operate the whole City Lighting District under the same assessment cost as the County had been operating; that after this step we would then bring the lightingtptothe proper standard; that he was suggesting a procedure policy; that he was hoping that initially the property owners themselves would carry the momentum to bring the street lights up to the proper standard; that at the time the property owners would not do this the staff could bring the areas back to the Council and set up additional zones and the Council could initiate zone districts and go ahead; that an effort would be made to maintain a uniform assessment district rate throughout the City. Mayor McCaron stated he thought this should be added to the City's policy and have a report later on the additional cost of intensifying the lighting in areas that were deficient. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT THE POLICY STATEMENT WOULD BE AS FOLLOWS: THAT WHERE AN AREA IS TO BE UPGRADED IN STREET LIGHTING THAT IT BE ACCOMPLISHED BY PETITION BY THE PROPERTY OWNERS WHICH PETITION SHOULD DESIGNATE WHETHER THEY WISH ORNAMENTAL POLES OR LOCATION OF LIGHTS ON EXISTING POLES: THAT THE PETITION WOULD BE PRESENTED TO THE COUNCIL AND PROCESSED ACCORDINGLY. COUNCILMAN CRITES SECONDED. Councilman Crites AMENDED THE MOTION TO READ: AFTER EVERYONE GES SOME LIGHTS" City Attorney Flandrick stated the program now was to get lights at the intersections and mid block; that being accomplished this was the second phase. Councilman Crites stated with this understanding he would withdraw his amendment. There were no objections, the motion carried and was so ordered by Mayor McCaron. 00- RESOLUTION NO. 66-198 SETTING A HEARING DATE FOR ANY PROTESTS OR OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT OF THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER ON WORK COMPLETED UNDER SECTION 3200 ET SEQ OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK N-IO) August 3, 1966 Page i3 MOTION MADE AND CARRIED THAT POLICY STATEMENT WOULD BE: THAT WHERE AN AREA IS TO BE UPGRADED IN ST. LIGHTING THAT IT BE ACCOMPLISHED BY PETITION BY THE PROP. OWNERS WHICH PETITION SHOULD DESIGNATE WHETHER THEY WISH ORNAMENTAL POLES OR LOCATION OF LIGHTS ON EXISTING POLES; THAT THE PETITION WOULD BE PRESENTED TO THE COUNCIL AND PROCESSED ACCORD- INGLY. MOTION AMENDED AMENDMENT WITHDRAWN MOTION CARRIED RES. NO. 66-198 SETTING A HEARING DATE FOR ANY PROTESTS OR OBJ. TO THE REPORT OF C.A.O. ON WORK COMPL. UNDER SECTION 3200 ET SEQ OF THE MUN. CODE OF CTY. OF B.PK. N-10) P.H. SEPT 7, 1966 COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 66-198 BE ADOPTED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD SECONDED. Roll Call. There were no objections, the motion carried. 00- RES. NO. 66-198 ADOPTED BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 08-U02 03-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117007-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 08 03 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1ùÍ«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council RESOLUTION NO. 66-199 SETTING A HEARING DATE FOR ANY?PROTESTS OR OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT OF THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER ON WORK COMPLETED UNDER SECTION 3200 ET SEQ OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK N-17) COUNCILMAN CRITES MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 66-199 BE ADOPTED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. Roll Call. There were no objections, the motion carried. 00- RESOLUTION NO. 66-200 SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A HEARING TO DETERMINE WHETHER CERTAIN BUILD- INGS AND STRUCTURES CONSTITUTE A PUBLIC NUISANCE N L12 COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT RESOLUTION No. 66-200 BE ADOPTED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY SECONDED. Roll Call. There were no objections, the motion carried. 00- City Engineer French stated on Thursday the State Division of Highways had a bid opening for the land- scaping of the Athol overpass and some landscaping on the Baldwin Park over crossing and a storm drain to be constructed in Francisquito from the freeway to the wash. He stated this involved the City of Badiwin Park in that the City was paying a certain percentage of the cost of the storm drain from Virginia to the wash; that the bids exceeded the State's estimate by approximately $5,000.00; that the storm drain was the reason the bid exceeded the State's estimate; that there were two alternatives: recommend to the State that they reject the bids or recommend that they award. He stated if the City recommended the award it could cost the City as much as $2100.00 for the additional cost; that there was a problem with rebid in that if the storm drain was to be constructed in time for the winter rain period it had to be awarded under this contract. He recommended that the Council recommend to the State they award the contract so that the drain could be installed for this rainy season; that the City would benefit more by having the drain installed than by waiting another year. Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated that funds would be made available when and if necessary. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL RECOMMEND TO THE STATE THAT THEY ACCEPT THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BID AND THAT THE CITY AGREE TO PAY ITS PROPORTIONATE SHARE OF THE OVERAGE IN COST ON THE PROJECT OUTLINED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY SECONDED. Roll Call. There were no objections, the motion carried. 00- August 3, 1966 Page 14 RES. NO. 66-199 SETTING A HEARING DATE FOR ANY PROTESTS OR OBJ. TO THE REPORT OF C.A.O. ON WORK COMPL. UNDER SEC. 3200 ET SEQ. OF MUN. CODE OF CTY. OF B.PK. N-17) P.H. SEPT. 7, 1966 RES. NO. 66-199 ADOPTED RES. NO. 66-200 SETTING A TIME AND PL. FOR A HEARING TO DETERMINE WHETHER CERTAIN BUILD. AND STRUCT. CONSTITUTE A PUB. NUISANCE N-42) P.H. SEPT. 7, 1966 RES. NO. 66-200 ADOPTED STATE DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS BID OPENING LANDSCAPING ATHOL OVERPASS AND B.PK. OVER CROSSING AND STORM DRAIN IN FRANCISQUITO FROM FREEWAY TO WASH MOTION MADE AND CARRIED THAT COUNCIL RECOMMEND TO STATE THAT THEY ACCEPT LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BID AND THAT CITY AGREE TO PAY ITS PROPORTIONATE SHARE OF OVERAGE IN COST ON PROJ. OUTLINED BY CITY ENGR. BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 08-U02 03-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117007-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 08 03 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1ùÍ«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council Regarding Resolution No. 66-205, Councilman Morehead stated he was of the opinion when he voted that Resolution No. 66-205 had reference to Item 2, not Item I of the City Engineer's report regarding mai& line sewer extensions. City Attorney Flandrick stated the resolution set the fee schedule for areas not included in the sewer districts; that the Council's action accepted the City Engineer's recommendation of $6.00 per lineal front foot. Councilman Morehead stated he was opposed to Resolution No. 66-205; that Item No. I covered streets such as Frazier and Vineland for properties fronting on the County Sanitation outfall line; that in 1961 the Council set this $2.00 front foot sewer connection fee; that he opposed that $2.00 cost then and he was certainly in opposition to the rate of $6.00 a front foot. He stated he did not think the residences fronting the County Sanitation outfall line should pay anything; that they had paid for the installment of this sewer line in the first place and now having to pay to hook onto it. Mayor McCaron stated they paid for it proportionately but so did the rest of the City pay for it but because it was not on their street the rest of the City was being penalized for having to pay for additional sewer line. Further discussion followed. Councilman Morehead stated he would like to have his vote recorded as a no" vote on Resolution No. 66-205. As there were no objections, Mayor McCaron directed that the City Clerk record Councilman Morehead's vote as being in the negative on Resolution No. 66-205. 00- Regarding the letter from Charles E. Berthel dated July 23, 1966, regarding Parcel Map No. 713, City Attorney Flandrick stated the staff recommendation was to note and file; that the problem was he had not complied with the conditions of approval on a prior lot split; that the City Engineer was now processing a new lot split application relating to the same property; that the same condition would be imposed; that he had a right of appeal to the Board and thereafter to the City Council. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT MR. BERTHEL'S LETTER BE RECEIVED AND FILED. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY SECONDED. There were no objections, the motion carried. 00- City Clerk Balkus reminded the Council of the League of California Cities meeting in October. Councilman Crites stated he had indicated, this date, his interest in attending the League Meeting in October. Chief Administrative Officer Nordby and City Clerk Balkus stated they would attend the meeting. Captain O'Leary stated that someone would be attending from the Police Department. August 3, 1966 Page 15 RE RES. NO. 66-205 COUNCIL INSTRUCTION CITY CLERK TO RECORD COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD'S VOTE AS BEING IN THE NEGATIVE ON RES. NO. 66-205 LETTER FROM CHAS. E. BERTHEL DATED JULY 23, 1966, RE PARCEL MAP NO. 713 RECEIVED AND FILED RE LEAGUE OF CALIF. CITIES MEETING IN OCT. Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 08-U02 03-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117007-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 08 03 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1ùÍ«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council As there was no objections, Mayor McCaron stated it would be the future policy that it should be automatic if funds had been budgeted for a purpose then it was up to each individual department head to watch that the funds carry through the year. 00- Councilwoman Gregory stated that on July 20, 1966, the Maine Avenue Improvement Project was accepted as approved by the City Engineer; that since that time she had received phone calls from business regarding drive approaches. City Engineer French stated there was a problem with the drive approaches because of the sidewalk adjacent to the curb; that there was no problem if the people enter the drives properly; that they were the standard drives that the City had used for some time. Mayor McCaron asked if it was the fast rise that the people were objecting to. City Engineer French states yes, that when the side- walk was put adjacent to the curb there were instances where sidewalks being adjacent to the curb they had to come up rather abruptly and if they drove in fast the cars bounce and drag. Mayor McCaron stated if the City had gonehback as far as they could, this was not the City's problem; that he thought a dedication would be in order first before any driveway was extended back further and sloped back; that this might throw the sidewalk out of kilter. He asked if it was possible to have a narrow sidewalk and a wide driveway approach. City Engineer French stated this had been done in some areas where there were problems. 00- Councilman Adair stated he had received calls concerning the poor supervision of the Teen Post. Mayor McCaron stated the people in charge of the Teen Post should receive the first complaint on this. Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated he had attended one of their Council Meetings made up of 15-20 teenagers; that they:made somewhat minor decisions on the conduct and the operation; that the Director had been changed. He stated there were many problems; that he would contact the adult board to see if more inner control could be exerted on the entire operation. Captain O'Leary stated he would be attending their Council Meeting on August 4, 1966. He stated that there was a small nucleus of trouble makers that had more or less taken over and driven out most of the teenagers that would like to enjoy the place. He further explained the E.Y.O.A. program and the problems involved; that Miss Avilla was the Director at the present time. August 3, 1966 Page 16 COUNCIL POLICY AUTOMATIC IF FUNDS HAD BEEN BUDGETED FOR PURPOSE UP TO EA. INDIVIDUAL DEPT. HEAD TO WATCH THAT FUNDS CARRY THROUGH THE YR. RE MAINE AVE. IMPROVE- MENT PROJECT. DRIVE APPROACHES RE CALLS RECEIVED ON SUPERVISION OF TEEN POST Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 08-U02 03-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117007-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 08 03 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1ùÍ«3048 I Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council Mayor McCaron stated according to what he had heard if it was to be continued there should be more adult supervision; that if not the City should withdraw its aid; that the matter should be taken up with the proper group and a report brought back to the Council. 00- Chief Administrative Officer Nordby stated in the budget sessions the change in the rate for mileage was considered for driving personal automobiles; that the rate of $.07 a mile was established about 1957; that there had been appreciation in the cost since that time but no change in that particular allowance; that he had suggested $.09 a mile and someone suggested $.IO a mile; that in the last two years staff cars had been provided for Department Heads and others who need them for field work so there was not too much money involved in a twelve 12) month period; that the change from $.07 to $.10 possibly would not involve more than $1-00.00 to $150.00 a year; that sufficient funds had been appropriated and he recommended that the City Council increase the rate from $.07 to $.10 a mile for any City Official authorized to submit expense vouchers. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT UPON THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER THAT THE MILEAGE NOW ALLOWED AT $.07 A MILE BE INCREASED TO $.IO A MILE FOR ANYONE IN THE CITY ON OFFICIAL BUSINESS THAT IS AUTHORIZED TO SUBMIT AN EXPENSE ACCOUNT. COUNCILMAN CRITES SECONDED. Discussion followed that the City of San Diego allowed $.15 a mile and many others allowed $.II and $.12; that some cities had a graduated scale beginning at quite a high figure for short trips and scaled down for longer distances. Roll Call. There were no objections, the motion carried. 00- RESOLUTION NO. 66-201 ALLOWING CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK COUNCILMAN CRITES MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 66-201 BE ADOPTED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN ADAIR SECONDED. Roll Call. There were no objections, the motion carried 00- RESOLUTION NO. 66-20~ ALLOWING CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK Continued) August 3, 1966 Page 17 COUNCIL INSTRUCTION REPORT TO BE BROUGHT BACK RE MILEAGE RATE FOR DRIVING PERSONAL CAR ON CITY BUSINESS MOTION MADE AND CARRIED THAT UPON REC. OF C.A.O. THAT MILEAGE NOW ALLOWED AT $.07 A MILE BE BE INCREASED TO $.IO A MILE FOR ANYONE IN CITY ON OFFICIAL BUS. THAT IS AUTH. TO SUB- MIT AN EXPENSE ACCOUNT MOTION CARRIED RES. NO. 66-201 ALLOWING CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AGAINST CITY OF B.PK. GEN. CLAIMS AND DEMANDS NOS. 1715- 1770 INCL. AND 173 PAYROLL CAAIMS AND DEMANDS FOR PERIOD 7-1-66 TO 7-15-66 RES. NO. 66-201 ADOPTED RES. NO. 66-203 ALLOWING CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AGAINST CITY OF B.PK. BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 08-U02 03-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117007-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1966 08 03 CC MINHÄ—@¸—1ùÍ«3 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council Finance Director Duncan explained that the Warrant No. 1771, was made out to Haeffner-Chrysler-Plymouth in the amount of $18,477.80 for the refund of their bid deposit and the purchase of eight 8) police units. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 66-203 BE ADOPTED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN CRITES SECONDED. Roll Call. There were no objections, the motion carried. 00- At 10:20 P.M. COUNCILMAN MOREHEAD MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADJOURN. COUNCILWOMAN GREGORY SECONDED. There were no objections, the motion carried and was so ordered by Mayor McCaron. 00- August 3, 1966 Page 18 GEN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS 1771 RES. NO. 66-203 ADOPTED ADJ. AT 10:20 P.M. THELMA L. BALKUS, CITY CLERK APPROVED: 1966,E DATE OF DISTRIBUTION TO CITY COUNCIL G Z A 1966. DATE OF DISTRIBUTION TO DEPARTMENTS 12-- 1966. BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 08-U02 03-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117007-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 Í«Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council August 3, 1966 Page 12 He further stated that the Council would be kept informed as to any necessary rate change; that this would require a report and this could not be done until the next fiscal year; that there was a contingency when the district was formed. Mayor McCaron stated he thought where lights were going in and there were existing poles that these existing poles should be used; that any new area opening up should be re- required to have ornamental light poles. City Engineer French stated this would be only for upgrad- ing existing areas where the property owners were initiat- ing the improvements. Councilwoman Gregory asked if the poles could be moved to the rear and the ornamental poles placed in areas where curbs, gutters and sidewalks were going in. Mayor McCaron stated he thought this should be taken care of as a separate item. City Engineer French stated that an attempt had been made to do as Mrs. Gregory had suggested with Baldwin Park Boule- vard; however, it was necessary to obtain an easement on the rear; that the property owners were contacted regard- ing easements and both utility companies agreed to go on the rear property line, but this was unsuccessful. Councilwomari.-Gregory asked if in the future the property owners could be asked if they would want to have the utility pole moved back to a rear easement. Mayor McCaron stated it could be requested, but he did not think the Council should make any demands. In answer to a question by Councilman Adair, Mayor McCaron stated the only advantage to putting in steel poles would be the aesthetic value; that there was an installation cost of approximately $135.00 and the pole still belonged to the power company; that to gain an advantage from putting in ornamental poles the City would have to buy the poles at the cost of approximately $.00.00 to $500.00 a pole. In answer to a question by Mayor McCaron, City Engineer French statediheeproblem at the present time was that the City was being contacted for additional lights; that a policy to proceed was needed. Discussion followed. Councilman Morehead stated it was his desire to see all of the streets lighted; that lights were now being installed at intersections and possibly some 200-400 feet away another light was being put in; that this was not what he had in- tended; that he had intended to have lights between these lights and illuminate the entire street and put them on existing poles; that he was expecting the streets to be lighted adequately, a light every 150-200 feet or whatever was adequate, and to be mounted on existing poles; that if a particular street wanted ornamental poles then the particular property owners involved should have to pay for them. City Attorney Flandrick stated this could be done by setting up zones ithin the district whereby the people decide by petition that they want ornamental poles; that Mr. French's question was how this would be processed. Continued) BIB] 39576-U01 1966-U02 08-U02 03-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO116938-U03 DO117007-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 5/7/2008-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06