Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1970 12 16 CC MIN1970 12 16 CC MIN(ÌìÕ¹peINDEX DECEMBER 16, 1970 Page Minutes 11/9/70 & 12/2/70 Approved Treasurer's Report of 11/30/70 received & filed Res. No. 70-292 Claims & Demands Adopted as amended ZV-230 Testimony Charles E. Berthel Discussion ZV-230 Approved 70-S-54 Res. No. 70-293 70-S-54) Adopted ZV-230 Clarification re parking spaces Cameras showing shots of public nuisances Res. No. 70-296 70-N-74) Adopted Res. No. 70-297 70-N-88) Adopted 70-N-89 Testimony Thomas Torri Res. No. 70-298 70-N-89) Adopted 70-N-98 Testimony Stanley Blumn Res. No. 70-299 70-N-98) Adopted Res. No. 70-300 70-N-99) Adopted Res. No. 70-301 70-A-56( Adopted 70-A-57, 70-A-58 & 70-A-59 removed from agenda Res. No. 70-302 70-C-6) Adopted Res. No. 70-303 70-C-17) Adopted 70-C-18 Testimony Mrs. Hopkinson Edward Dubiak Mrs. Haltie Slater 70-C-18 taken under submission pending report Res. No. 70-304 70-C-19) Discussion Res. No. 70-304 Adopted Res. No. 70-305 70-C-20) Discussion Res. No. 70-305 Adopted 70-W-43 Testimony Matt Patritti Res. No. 70-306 70-W-43, 48 & 58) Adopted Ord. No. 579 Re Uniform Building Codes) Introduced Public Hearing set for January 6, 1971 Ord. No. 582 Re Public Health Code) Introduced 18 18 18 19 19 19 19 19 19 Res. No. 70-316 Approve Report And Set Hearing Date of 1/20/71 Adopted 19 Res. No. 70-317 Declaring Intent And Setting Public Hearing 1/20/71 Adopted 20 Councilman Gregory Resides in District 20 Watson's Tax Measure City Manager to contact Pres. of League 20 Resolution No. 70-307 SUPPORTING THE HOLIDAY SAFETY PROGRAM OF THE NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL Adopted 20 Public Hearing set for January 6, 1971 Walnut Street Assessment District Res. No. 70-310 Appointing Engineer Adopted Res. No. 70-311 Appointing Counsel Adopted Res. No. 70-312 Ordering Plans and Specifications Adopted Res. No. 70-313 Adopting Plans and Specifications Adopted Res. No. 70-314 Approve Right-Of-Way Acquisitions Adopted Res. No. 70-315 Order Report Re Investigation, Limitation And Majority Protest Act Adopted 2, 3 & 4 10 10 10 11 11 11 12 13 14 15 15 16 16 17 BIB] 37659-U01 1970-U02 12-U02 16-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO9996-U03 DO10054-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1970 12 16 CC MIN(ÌìÕ¹pe\ INDEX December 16, 1970 Page 2 Page Councilman Gregory delegate to the Los Angeles Comprehensive Health Planning Association, Board of Directors, League of California Cities and Chairman of the Underground!ng Utilities Committee. 21 TUP for Sale of Xmas Trees Tony Virgil Approved 21 Mrs. Gray re Walnut Street Assessment District 21 70-S-14. 70-S-26, 70-S-27, 70-S-29 & 70-S-30 21 Res. No. 70-294 70-S-14, 26, 27. 29 & 30) Adopted 22 Res. No. 70-308 70-N-87, 91, 92, 94, 95, 97, 100, 101, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107 & 108) Adopted 22 Res. No. 70-309 70-A-62 & 63) Adopted 22 Open End Contract 1971 Awarded to J.O. Castaneda & Sons, Pomona 22 & 23 Res. No. 70-295 ADOPTING A SCHEDULE OF STREET IMPROVEMENT CHARGES Adopted 23 Planning Commissioner Robert McCord's Term to Expire 2/2/71 23 Report re Z-329 Ordinance to be prepared Second reading to be held 23 Ord. No. 580 Re Franchises) Adopted 23 & 24 Adjourned 10:58 p.m. 24 BIB] 37659-U01 1970-U02 12-U02 16-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO9996-U03 DO10054-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1970 12 16 CC MIN(ÌìÕ¹peOOCH663 DECEMBER 16. 1970 7:30 P.M. REGULAR MEETING OF THE BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER) 14403 East Pacific Avenue In accordance with Section 2703 of the Municipal Code the City Council met in open meeting at 7:00 p.m. in the Conference Room for an informal session with the Staff to be informed on regular agenda items. The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park met in regular session at the above place at 7:30 p.m. Councilman Blewett led the salute to the flag. Roll Call: Present: COUNCILMEN BLEWETT. HAMILTON, KING AND MAYOR PRO TEM GREGORY Present: Absent: Also Present: MAYOR MCCARON CITY MANAGER NORDBY, CITY ATTORNEY FLAKDRICK, CITY ENGINEER FRENCH, PLANNING DIRECTOR CHIVETTA, FINANCE DIRECTOR DUNCAN. CHIEF OF POLICE ADAMS AND CITY CLERK BALKUS Absent: CITY TREASURER CODLING 00- COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT MAYOR MCCARON AND CITY TREASURER CODLING BE EXCUSED. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- COUNCILMAN HAMILTON MOVED THAT THE MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 9. 1970 AND DECEMBER 2, 1970 BE APPROVED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILAMN BLEWETT SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- COUNCILMAN HAMILTON MOVED THAT THE TREASURER'S REPORT OF NOVEMBER 30, 1970 BE RECEIVED AND FILED. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- RESOLUTION NO. 70-292 ALLOWING CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK COUNCILMAN BLEWETT MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 70-292 BE ADOPTED AS AMENDED Amount changed from $163,676.68 to $163,594.81 1515 Deleted in the amount of $81.87) AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED, Roll Call. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- City Clerk Batkus administered the oath. 00- PUBLIC HEARINGS FLAG SALUTE ROLL CALL MAYOR MCCARON AND CITY TREASURER CODLING EXCUSED MINUTES OF NOV. 9. AND DEC. 2, 1970 APPROVED TREASURER'S REPORT RECEIVED & FILED RES. NO. 70-292 CLAIMS & DEMANDS 1464 1630 PAYROLL PERIOD 11/16/70 11/30/70 RES. NO. 70-292 ADOPTED AS AMENDED OATH PUBLIC HEARINGS 7:30 P.M. 7:30 p.m. having arrived, it was the time and place fixed PUBLIC HEARING for a public hearing on ZV-230, a request for a Zone Variance ZV-230 to vary with Section 9571 subsection 3, paragraphs, a) 1, 2, Continued) BIB] 37659-U01 1970-U02 12-U02 16-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO9996-U03 DO10054-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1970 12 16 CC MIN(ÌìÕ¹peOG046JG4 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council December 16, 1970 Page 2 3; b) 1, 2, 3, 4; c) 1, 2, 3; d) 1, 2, 3, 4 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code, to permit encroachment into required yard areas for main buildings and accessory buildings; also, requested is a Variance to vary with off- street parking requirements. Section 9571 subsection h) of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code, for that certain real property located at 13834 E. Olive Street in the City of Baldwin Park. Applicant Charles E. Berthel. This case continued from October 21, 1970, November 4, 1970 and November 18, 1970. Proper publication, postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. PUBLICATION, POSTINGS & MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS Planning Director Chivetta stated that the property was RESUME located at 13834 E. Olive Street and that the applicant had submitted a revised plan which would provide a zero lot tine set back for his accessory buildings adjacent to interior property tines and provide a front yard setback of 17 feet 6 inches for a major portion of the buildings along Olive Street and the remainder of the building would then observe a 20' front yard setback. He stated that, in essence, the applicant was now asking for a 100% reduction of the side and rear yard setback for accessory buildings located on the Westerly and Southerly property lines and was asking for a 2'6" reduction in the front yard for a portion of his proposed building. Planning Director Chivetta stated that the Planning Department had checked alt the properties between Stewart Avenue and Walnut and found that the average front yard setback of those structures was 17'. He stated that Mr. BertheTs request was not unreasonable as far as the reduction of the front yard was concerned. However, he stated that there are pros and cons on reducing the yard setback for accessory buildings to the 100% zero line and this should be discussed. TESTIMONY WAS GIVEN BY: TESTIMONY Mr. Charles E. Berthel. 13834 E. Olive, stated that he would be happy to answer any questions the Council might have. CHARLES E. BERTHEL 13834 E. Olive Councilman King stated that he did not feel that the garages DISUCSSION should be right on the property line and they should be in the proper location. He stated that the fact that this property could be rezoned, at a later date, to R-3 concerned him because if the structures were adjacent to property lines and no setback he was afraid of the hazards of fire and maintenance. Planning Director Chivetta stated that he was assuming that Councilman King's comment was relative to the R-1 property located Southerly of the applicant's property and the possibility of a multiple development taking place there and similar garages being built along this property line which would be more or less, like a common wall with the garages proposed by the applicant and the possibility of, in the event of a fire, the jumping of fire from one building to the other and continuing right down the block. He stated that this was a possibility, however, if this property was developed as R-1 or even a multiple family residential zone the same condition would apply to this property owner staying 5' off the property tine, unless they applied for a variance and asked for special dispensation. He stated that the burden of proof was on the applicant and whether he could justify this, so perhaps in these areas there could be some consideration given where possibly a 4 hour fire paraphet wall of reinforced concrete could be constructed which would delete the possibility of fire jumping to at least 99%. He stated that with the regular one hour fire wall the fire could jump Continued) BIB] 37659-U01 1970-U02 12-U02 16-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO9996-U03 DO10054-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1970 12 16 CC MIN(ÌìÕ¹peRegular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council December 16, 1970 Page 3 over. He stated that the one fire wall could be masonry, solid reinforced concrete and the other could be a frame stucco over lathe. He stated that there should be some consideration given to the adjacent properties and if the property developed into R-1 with lots cut off at a futrre street into this area, then this particular development would have no effect on the R-1 development in terms of being on that line. Councilman Blewett stated that zero side yard setbacks cause a kind of blight and when you have a 5' setback, quite often you see an area that is totally unattended. He stated that he was torn between the hazards of possible fire and the aesthetics involved. Mr. Charles E. Berthel stated that this matter had been gone over before and he had gone to several other Cities and found out that the 5' setback would, in due time, create quite a problem to keep clean and every year he would have a 5' problem of weeding and there must be a better way of doing this. He stated, that he was very concerned about fire and if it was a requirement to build a high wall, he would comply. Councilman Hamilton asked if this wall would be fire proof as required by the Building Code and Planning Director Chivetta answered that it would have to be according to the Unified Building Code. He stated that if Council desired to approve the variance, they could stipulate whether a 4 hour or 1 hour fire wall be installed. Planning Director Chivetta presented a rendering of the proposed garage structures and explained that the wall under discussion would be a parapet type wall going up to a height of 10'6", protruding above the roof line and across the rear of the garages. He stated that the masonry or reinforced concrete would possibly stop fire from jumping over. He stated that when setting the garage back using a 6" high masonry wall, which is required, an additional 4' might as well be added. He stated that subterranean parking would be an ideal solution, except for the amount of money involved. Councilman King asked about the maintenance factpr on these walls that were on the property line. Planning Director Chivetta stated that the back of the garage walls could be of slump stone or masonry with a texture added so they would present an attractive appearance to adjoining properties. Councilman Btewett stated that he saw no need to put texture on that side of the wan, as it would serve no purpose. Councilman King replied that it would be for the benefit of the people who had to face that wall and that it was not too much to ask that the wall be pleasing to the eye. Planning Director Chivetta stated that the Southerly property was one parcel capable of being divided into four lots and these parcels would have a 20' front yard setback. The garages would start 75' back from the property line so the house would not be adjacent to the wall. He stated that the garage could be on the property line or 5* back. He stated that there were a lot of its" involved in the matter under discussion. Continued) BIB] 37659-U01 1970-U02 12-U02 16-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO9996-U03 DO10054-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1970 12 16 CC MIN(ÌìÕ¹pe0^04666 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council December 16, 1970 Page 4 Mayor pro tern Gregory stated that these were stipulations which should be considered for the future because most people, in California, lived outdoors and had patios and if the property adjacent to the R-3 developed, the vielw the property owner would be looking at was a matter of Importance that Council would have to determine. Mr. Charles E. Berthel stated that he felt vines or plants of any sort would add to the appearance of the wall. Councilman King stated that he felt Mr. Berthel had misunderstood him and what he was referring to was beautifi cation of the wall itself and if it was on the property line he would want the wait pleasing to the eye of the adjacent property owners regardless of which way they wanted to place their homes. Mayor pro tern Gregory asked Planning Director Chivetta if this recent plan had gone before the Planning Commission or whether there had just been discussion with the applicant. Planning Director Chivetta answered that the Council had directed the Planning Department to work with the applicant in order for Mr. Berthel to resubmit a plan that might be acceptable. He stated that the only variance from the original plan was the 17'6" front yard instead of the 10' that was in the original plan. He stated that the garages were always proposed to be on the property line and now it was necessary to determine whether the applicant could justify the request for the zero lot line for the accessory buildings, which were the garages. He stated that the Council had three alternatives, which would be approval, denial or approval subject to conditions. He stated that the case did not have to go back to the Planning Commission for a report or study; that the original plan was denied by the Planning Commission because the applicant failed to prove a hardship but that the new plan could be directed to the Planning Commission for possible conditions to be imposed before the Resolution was adopted. Councilman King asked if any new evidence had been presented to Council and Planning Director Chivetta answered that there had not been that much change in the request. Councilman King stated that he thought the Commission might want to inject something into this matter and if he were a Commissioner he would want to analyse and consider the matter more thoroughly. He stated the Conmission might want to add or delete and he would like to see the Commission review it again with Council's views. Councilman Hamilton stated that he did not see that there was a big problem with this request and the only point in his mind was whether the fire wall should be 1 hour, 2 hours or 4 hours. He stated that this had been before Council and back to the Planning Commission and he felt that too much time was taken with some of these matters. He stated that, at times, there was too much red tape and the building contractors got discouraged because of the delays and he felt that a ruling could be made without further delay. He stated that he would be satisfied with a good masonry wall, he did not feel an expensive wall was needed, because it was a back wall and he felt a ruling could be made immediately. Councilman Blewett stated that by referring matters, that could be settled by Council, back to the Planning Commission, the Council was neglecting their responsibilities and he fe1t» also, that a decision could be made. Continued) BIB] 37659-U01 1970-U02 12-U02 16-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO9996-U03 DO10054-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1970 12 16 CC MIN(ÌìÕ¹peWew Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council December 16, 1970 Page 5 Mayor pro tern Gregory stated that her only concern was the fact that what Councilman Hamilton referred to as a back yard" was someone elses side yard and that was a reason for a bit more thought. There was further discussion concerning the type of fire wall needed and Planning Director Chivetta stated that a 4 hour fire wall would provide the protection needed. Mayor pro tern Gregory stated that she recommended some thought be given to the type of material used on the back on the garage that would some day be facing someone's side yard. Planning Director Chivetta stated that scored block or slump stone could be used. Mayor pro tern Gregory stated that eventually by the time plans came before the Planning Department for building on adjacent lots the City would have their Precise Plan Ordinance so that the type of wall used could be designated. She stated that at the present time, some type of standards must be set. City Attorney FIandrick stated that he did not see any problem and if the Council granted the variance the Resolution would have several conditions. He stated that the first condition would be compliance with the Plot Plan submitted, maximum of 22 units, not less than 60 off street parking spaces, 4 hour fire wall on each of the garage walls and that sides be of slump stone or some type of decorative or textured material. Councilman King stated that in regard to the photograph that was presented of the building itself he felt the elevations should be considered. City Attorney FIandrick stated that the photograph should be marked Exhibit A" and the sketch Plot Plan be marked Exhibit B". The fact was brought up that just the portion of the garage walls that were on the property line would require 4 hour fire wall. As there was no one else in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to ZV-230, Mayor pro tern Gregory declared the public hearing closed. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON MOVED THAT PLANS SUBMITTED BE APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. COMPLIANCE WITH PLOT PLAN, EXHIBIT A AND B, NOT TO EXCEED 22 UNITS, NOT LESS THAN 60 later changed to 50) OFF STREET PARKING SPACES BE PERMITTED. THAT AS TO THOSE PORTIONS OF THE GARAGE WALLS ABUTTING OR ADJACENT TO THE LOT LINES WITH THE ZERO SETBACKS THEY BE 4 HOUR FIRE WALL CONSTRUCTION WITH AN APPROPRIATE FACING MATERIAL ON THOSE PORTIONS OF THE WALL DIRECTED TOWARD OTHER PROPERTY OF EITHER SLUMP STONE, SCORED BLOCK OR OTHER DECORATIVE FACING MATERIAL. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. Mr. Berthel stated that he was under the impression that it was 50 off street parking spaces instead of 60. 00- It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on 70-S-54, a Short Form 1911 Act, on the Southwest side of Monterey Avenue between Frazier Street and Baldwin Park Boulevard for curb and gutter. Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. Continued) PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED ZV-230 PLANS APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS COMPLIANCE WITH PLOT PLAN NOT TO EXCEED 22 UNITS NOT LESS THAN 60 CHANGED TO 50) PARKING SPACES WALLS ABUTTING LOT LINES OF 4 HOUR FIRE WALL CONSTRUCTION DECORATIVE FACING MATERIAL PUBLIC HEARING SHORT FORM 70-S-54 C&G) POSTINGS, MAILINGS BIB] 37659-U01 1970-U02 12-U02 16-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO9996-U03 DO10054-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1970 12 16 CC MIN(ÌìÕ¹pe64668 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council There were no written protests. As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to 70-S-54, Mayor pro tern Gregory declared the public hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 70-293 ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS PURSUANT TO SECTION 5870, ET SEQ., OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAY CODE 70-S-54) City Engineer French stated that in Section 1 c) the word no" should be inserted. COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 70-293 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- City Attorney Flandrick announced at this time that Planning Director Chivetta had advised him that he and Mr. Chivetta were both incorrect and that it was 50 off street parking spaces in Case No. ZV-230. Applicant Charles Berthel. He stated that Mr. Berthel would be advised of this fact. 00- City Engineer French stated that the Television Cameras would show brief shots, of two minutes or less, of all the Public Nuisance properties. These pictures were taken December 15, 1970. 00- It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on 70-N-74, to determine whether certain premises and buildings and structures constitute a public nuisance at 4960 Bleecker Street. Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. City Engineer French stated that this was mainly a problem of outside storage and yard clean up. He stated further, that the Engineering Department had been working with this property owner in respect to the widening of Nubia Street and the property owner had dedicated 30' of land for the widening of Nubia at this corner. He presented photographs of the property. As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to 70-N-74, Mayor pro tern Gregory declared the public hearing dosed. RESOLUTION NO. 70-296 FINDING AND DETERMINING THE EXISTENCE OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING THE SAME ABATED 70-N-74) City Engineer French stated that in Section 2, a time limit of 90" days should be established. COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 70-296 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. December 16, 1970 Page 6 NO WRITTEN PROTESTS PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED 70-S-54 RES. NO. 70-293 ORDER CONSTRUCTION 70-S-54) SECTION I c) WORD NO" INSERTED RES. NO. 70-293 ADOPTED ZV-230 CLARIFICATION 50 PARKING SPACES T.V. CAMERAS SHOWING BRIEF SHOTS OF PROPERTY INVOLVED IN PUBLIC NUISANCES PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC NUISANCE 70-N-74 POSTINGS, MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS RESUME PHOTOS PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED 70-N-74 RES. NO. 70-296 ORDER ABATEMENT 70-N-74) SECTION 2 90" DAYS TO ABATE RES. NO. 70-296 ADOPTED 00- BIB] 37659-U01 1970-U02 12-U02 16-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO9996-U03 DO10054-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1970 12 16 CC MIN(ÌìÕ¹ peRegular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on 70-N-88, to determine whether certain premises and buildings and structures constitute a public nuisance at 13613 Frazier Street. Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. City Engineer stated that as the photographs indicated, the problem was mainly clean up and the removal of a trailer shell. As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to 70-N-88, Mayor pro tern Gregory, declared the public hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 70-297 FINDING AND DETERMINING THE EXISTENCE OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING THE SAME ABATED 70-N-88) City Engineer French stated that in Section 2, a time limit of 30" days should be established. COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 70-297 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on 70-N-89. to determine whether certain premises and buildings and structures constitute a public nuisance 3736 Rhodes Lane. Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. City Engineer French stated that this action consisted of yard cleanup and bringing the building up to the Uniform Building Code or demolishing the building. He stated that the majority of the yard cleanup had been completed. He presented photographs of the property. TESTIMONY WAS GIVEN BY: Mr. Thomas Torn', 9415 Portada Drive, Whittier, stated that the letter he had received from the City regarding this Public Nuisance made him feel ashamed, as whatever property they owned was kept up and the did not let this happen. He stated that in this case, he owned the Second Trust Deed for his two daughters and he informed Council of the various amounts of money he had invested in this property. He stated that he became the owner in October of this year and when he took the property he checked it very carefully and everything seemed to be normal. He stated that he then received a notice that the tenant was moving out around November 16th of this year. He stated that a neighbor, Mr. Soldano had totd him the house was moved there in 1964 and that there was a lady plus 8 to 10 children who lived there and two men going in and out. He stated that his request was to be allowed to do the work involved himself because of the high cost of paying others to do the work and the fact that much of the work was substandard after you paid to have it done. He stated that he would tike to have a list of exactly what the City wanted done and he would start immediately getting it done. Continued) December 16, 1970 Page 7 PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC NUISANCE 70-N-88 POSTINGS, MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS RESUME PHOTOS PUBLIC HEARING. DECLARED CLOSED 70-N-88 RES. NO. 70-297 ORDER ABATEMENT 70-N-88) SECTION 2 30" DAYS TO ABATE RES. NO. 70-297 ADOPTED PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC NUISANCE 70-N-89 POSTINGS. MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS RESUME PHOTOS TESTIMONY THOMAS TORRI 9415 PORTADA DRIVE WHITTIER. CALTF. BIB] 37659-U01 1970-U02 12-U02 16-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO9996-U03 DO10054-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1970 12 16 CC MIN(ÌìÕ¹ pe00046'7X) Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council December 16, 1970 Page 8 City Engineer French stated that the Engineering Department wanted the property owner to handle the problem and would prefer not getting involved in the matter, however, he stated that it was a standard policy that on a rental the property owner was required to have a licensed contractor do the electrical and the plumbing. He stated that this was a safety and health item. He stated that work had been done on this structure without benefit of permit and this was another part of the problem and that the garage had been converted to sleeping quarters. City Attorney Flandrick stated that if the Council determined the property was a public nuisance, that Mr. Torri be asked to contact City Engineer French for a specific list of problems under the building code, general yard cleanup and reconversion of the garage. In answer to Mr. Torri*s question. City Engineer French explained that it would be possible to get a temporary meter for power. As there was no one else in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to 70-N-89, Mayor pro tern Gregory declared the public hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 70-298 FINDING AND DETERMINING THE EXISTENCE OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING THE SAME ABATED 70-N-89) City Engineer French stated that in Section 2. a time limit of 60" days should be established. COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 70-298 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on 70-N-98, to determine whether certain premises and buildings and structures constitute a public nuisance at 4848-52 Elizabeth Avenue. Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. City Engineer French presented photographs taken of the property on December 15, 1970; stated that work had started and that the trailers had been removed from the property. He stated that there were building violations in the main large structure and a garage had been converted to living quarters without benefit of permit. He stated that it was the opinion of the Engineering Department that the main structure was not rehabitabte and would require demolition. City Engineer French stated that the Engineering Department had received a telegram from the property owner, Mrs. Cleoma Marcee, stating that it would be impossible for her to attend the meeting and that later she had called and said she would try to have some one at the meeting to represent her. TESTIMONY WAS GIVEN BY: Mr. Stanley Blumn, 68623 Garvey, Rosemead, presented a tetter from the property owner and stated that Mrs. Marcee had done a lot to repair and fix up the property and that this past summer she had invested $2000.00 in adding a porch and repairing the foundation. He stated that the property looked very good inside and she had removed the trailers. Continued) PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED 70-N-89 RES. NO. 70-298 ORDER ABATEMENT 70-N-89) SECTION 2 60" DAYS TO ABATE RES. NO. 70-298 ADOPTED PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC NUISANCE 70-N-98 POSTINGS, MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS RESUME PHOTOS TESTIMONY STANLEY BLUMN 68623 GARVEY ROSEMEAD BIB] 37659-U01 1970-U02 12-U02 16-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO9996-U03 DO10054-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1970 12 16 CC MIN(ÌìÕ¹ peW19W1 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council December 16, 1970 Page 9 City Engineer French stated that much of the work that had been done on the property was done against the advise of the Building Department; that they had told the property owner that what was being done on the property was not solving their structural problems. Mrs. Marcee's letter was read, stating that almost a year ago she realized that the Engineering Department was correct when they informed her it was not feasible to; repair 4852 N. Elizabeth Street. She stated that it would first have been necessary to pay off the $6000.00 mortgage loan, tear down in the neighborhood of $2000.00 and a total of $8000.00 cash would have been involved. She stated that, at that time, she was advised that Baldwin Park was considered a depressed area and the high percentage loan as well as the property being in a very poor neighborhood combined to make this a very bad situation. She stated that she was making every effort to save the property as she had already spent more than $6800.00. City Engineer French stated that in regard to Mrs. Marcee's letter there was structural damage and the Engineering Department does not believe that it would be practical to spend the money to complete the work that would be necessary. He stated that the foundation and footings of the house were in deplorable condition. Mr. Blumn stated that a foundation had been put under the house. City Engineer French stated that this was part of the problem, a great deal of money had been spent on work that was not the answer to the problem and the necessary supports were not under the house. Mr. Blumn stated that this work was supposed to have been done by a contractor. City Engineer French stated that he did not know what the contractor was supposed to do, but what it would take to bring that building up to compliance with the building code and to make it safe had not been done. City Engineer French informed Mr. Blumn that if he would come into the Building Department, he could get a complete list of the problems involved. Mayor pro tern Gregory stated that Mrs. Marcee, in her zeal to get the property taken care of, was probably being taken advantage of. She suggested that Mr. Blumn talk to City Engineer French, during the day. find out what was lacking and then he could talk to Mrs. Marcee and find out if it was worth the additional amount of money that would be necessary to bring the structure up to code. Mr. Blumn stated that he would come in to see City Engineer French on December 17, 1970. As there was no one else in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to 70-N-98, Mayor pro tern Gregory declared the public hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 70-299 FINDING AND DETERMINING THE EXISTENCE OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING THE SAME ABATED 70-N-98) City Engineer French stated that in Section 2, a time limit of 60" days should be established. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 70-299 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00 PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED 70-N-98 RES. NO. 70-299 ORDER ABATEMENT 70-N-98) SECTION 2 60" DAYS TO ABATE RES. NO. 70-299 ADOPTED BIB] 37659-U01 1970-U02 12-U02 16-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO9996-U03 DO10054-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1970 12 16 CC MIN(ÌìÕ¹ 1970 12 16 CC MIN(ÌìÕ¹ pe%<Wt3 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on 70-C-6, to determine whether failure to construct certain street improvements constitute a public nuisance at 3525 Maine Avenue. Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to 70-C-6, Mayor pro tern Gregory declared the public hearing dosed. RESOLUTION NO. 70-302 FINDING AND DETERMINING THE EXISTENCE OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING THE SAME ABATED 70-C-6) City Engineer French stated that in Section 2, a time limit of 10" days should be established. THAT RESOLUTION NO. 70-302 BE READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN KING objections. The motion carried COUNCILMAN BLEWETT MOVED ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER SECONDED. There were no and was so ordered. 00- December 16, 1970 Page 11 PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC NUISANCE 70-C-6 POSTINGS, MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS PUBLIC HEARIN& DECLARED CLOSED 70-C-6 RES. NO. 70-302 ORDER ABATEMENT 70-C-6) SECTION 2 10" DAYS TO ABATE RES. NO. 70-302 ADOPTED It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on 70-C-17, to determine whether failure to construct certain street improvements constitute a public nuisance at 3541 Cosbey Avenue. Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. City Engineer French stated that the Engineering Department had been in contact with the property owner and they want these street improvements included with their taxes. As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to 70-C-17, Mayor pro tern Gregory declared the public hearing dosed. RESOLUTION NO. 70-303 FINDING AND DETERMINING THE EXISTENCE OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING THE SAME ABATED 70-C-17) City Engineer French stated that in Section 2, a time limit of 10" days should be established. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 70-303 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on 70-C-18, to determine whether failure to construct certain street improvements constitute a public nuisance at 4861 Stancroft Street. Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. Continued) PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC NUISANCE 70-C-17 POSTINGS, MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS RESUME PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED 70-C-17 RES. NO. 70-303 ORDER ABATEMENT 70-C-17) SECTION 2 10" DAYS TO ABATE RES. NO. 70-303 ADOPTED PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC NUISANCE 70-C-18 POSTINGS, MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS BIB] 37659-U01 1970-U02 12-U02 16-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO9996-U03 DO10054-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1970 12 16 CC MIN(ÌìÕ¹pe000^74 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council City Engineer French presented photographs of the property and stated the sidewalk would be 5' adjacent to curb in tills area. He stated that there were 6 or 8 properties that had garages that were not in the back yard and most of the properties had concrete drive approaches already constructed that would be used as part of the sidewalk. City Clerk Balkus read a petition signed by property owners on Stancroft Street in opposition to the street construction. The petition stated that the property owners did not feel a sidewalk was needed or wanted because the street was a dead end street, one block long and 30" wide and three houses on the street were so close to the road that a car in the drive way would protrude out over the walkway if the garage door was open even if the sidewalk was next to the curb. The petition stated further that only 10 children were using the gate entering the school yard and the property owners felt they needed every bit of greenery they could get in the form of trees and grass. Petition in official files.) TESTIMONY WAS GIVEN BY: Mrs. Hopkinson, 4851 Stancroft, stated that she saw no real need for sidewalks and the added expense and if there was a need the property owners would put them in. Mr. Edward Dubiak, 4861 Stancroft, stated that he felt it would be an eye sore and the sidewalks would run into the school fence. Mrs. Halite Slater, 4814 Stancroft, seated that if the sidewalk was put in and she pulled her car in past the sidewalk she could not open her garagp doors. She stated that she also had a five year old daugnter who goe^ to school and she does not see any reason to put sidewalks in. She felt they would be inconvenient to say the least. As there was no one else in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to 70-C-18, Mayor pro tern Gregory declared the public hearing closed. Mayor pro tern Gregory stated that she would tike to have some discussion from the Council on 70-C-18. Councilman King stated that he felt in this particular instance the sidewalk could be deleted as the street was narrow and goes nowhere. City Engineer French stated that Stancroft which is 600' in length is like any street that leads up to a school and where pedestrians are involved the sidewalk provides a safety area. He stated that this is a cul-de-sac street which is basically used by the people on the street and it would be debatable as to whether a sidewalk was a necessity. If it served a larger area he would definitely recommend sidewalks. He stated that children use the street; the Engineering Department would tike a determination from the Council. He said this case had been before Council before with problems. Mayor pro tern Gregory stated that there are quite a few streets similar to this street; that at this particular time, she felt sidewalks should be waived and if the time came that the property owners would petition and felt it was a feasible thing to have sidewalks adjacent to curbs ther, the sidewalks could be put in at a later date. Continued) December 16, 1970 Page 12 RESUME TESTIMONY MRS. HOPKINSON 4851 STANCROFT EDWARD DUBIAK 4861 STANCROFT MRS. HALLIE SLATER 4814 STANCROFT PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED 70-C-18 DISCUSSION BIB] 37659-U01 1970-U02 12-U02 16-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO9996-U03 DO10054-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1970 12 16 CC MIN(ÌìÕ¹peC/QOT675 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council December 16, 1970 Page 13 Councilman Blewett stated that since this was a departure from a stated policy he felt there should be a full Council to make this determination. He felt that this covered a wider area then just Stancroft Street as there were many cul-de-sacs in the City that he did not feel would ever need sidewalks, however the Council should establish a policy. Councilman Hamilton stated that he was in agreement with the property owners of Stancroft and did not see any real need for sidewalks in that particular area. Councilman King stated there are many instances where one property on the block makes a building addition and that he did not think that enough consideration was given to the fact that street improvements are required when people apply for a building permit and start to build; that more consideration should be given to this requirement. City Engineer French stated that until a couple of years ago the Engineering Department had made decisions based upon the needs in the block. He stated that if there was an area, as here, the Engineering Department felt the sidewalk should be adjacent to curb because of the location of the structures in the block this was taken into consideration as part of the design plan. He stated that the Planning Department felt very strongly that sidewalks should not be put adjacent to curb. He stated that because of this the Council adopted a policy that says that if sidewalks were required, where there was a normal right-of- way width and normal street design the property owners must, at that time, petition for sidewalk adjacent to curb. Mayor pro tern Gregory stated that since the public hearing had been closed some form of action must be taken. Councilman King stated that a policy should be established in regard to cul-de-sacs. City Attorney Ftandrick stated that if Council wished to accomplish the deletion of sidewalks the matter should be. taken under submission and the gentleman whose property was involved should be requested to apply pursuant to our code for a building regulation variance or amend the code. City Engineer French suggested that this be done for the entire street and City Attorney Flandrick stated that this could not be done in the absence of a change in the ordinance. City Attorney Flandrick stated that this could be done if the Council wished to have, at City Engineer French's convenience, a survey conducted of streets where these peculiar circumstances are applicable. He stated that the section of the code requiring the construction of s?dewa1ks could be amended. Mayor pro tern Gregory stated that a survey of this type would be time consuming as there were many cut-de-sac streets in the City. City Engineer French stated that, if possible, he would rather not survey the streets because in some cul-de-sacs the people want the sidewalks. He asked if this matter could be brought back to Council with a recommendation and a report on the entire section of Stancroft street. City Attorney Flandrick stated that deletion of sidewalk could be done by amending the ordinance to indicate there are exceptions in certain streets, as listed, and Stancroft could be listed with others to be listed as they arise. As there were no objections 70-C-18 was taken under submission until a report 1s made. 00- 70-C-18 TAKEN UNDER SUBMISSION PENDING REPORT BIB] 37659-U01 1970-U02 12-U02 16-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO9996-U03 DO10054-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1970 12 16 CC MIN(ÌìÕ¹peOC1M676 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing, on 70-C-19, to determine whether failure to construct certain street improvements constitute a public nuisance at 3255 Cosbey Avenue. Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to 70-C-19, Mayor pro tern Gregory declared the public hearing dosed. RESOLUTION NO. 70-304 FINDING AND DETERMINING THE EXISTENCE OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING THE SAME ABATED 70-C-19) City Engineer French stated that in Section 2, a time limit of 30" days should be established. COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 70-304 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON SECONDED. Councilman Blewett requested discussion on the Resolution. He stated that this was also a cul-de-sac street and he felt it would be descrimi nation to enforce sidewalks, on one street and waived on another. Mayor pro tern Gregory stated that the area had been posted and there was no one in the audience to protest and she questioned whether this was the same type of problem. Councilman King stated that there is no protest and no petition by the individual property owners and this was a different problem. Councilman Blewett stated that he could not agree with this because although the property owners were not present to protest the Council must still protect their interests; that Stancroft goes to a school and this street goes nowhere makes little difference. City Engineer French presented photographs of the property and stated sidewalk would be adjacent to curb and the garages were at the minimum setback. He stated that the Engineering Department had been in contact with the people who hold the loan. The people who hold the loan had indicated that they do not have any objection to sidewalks. However, they could not speak for the property owner, and no word had been received from the people listed as the property owners. Councilman Blewett stated that there would be less walking traffic on this street than on Stancroft. Councilman King stated that he would tike to see curb, gutter and sidewalk throughout the City except for a very few exceptions, and Stancroft Street was one of these exceptions. He stated that in this case since no one had protested and there had been no petition in protest, he felt the sidewalks should be put in. Councilman Hamilton stated that he was in agreement with Councilman King and since there was no objection from the property owners he felt the Engineering Department should go right ahead with the sidewalks. There was further discussion regarding the necessity of sidewalks on Cosbey Avenue. Continued) December 16, 1,970 Page 14 PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC NUISANCE 70-C-19 POSTINGS, MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED 70-C-19 RES. NO. 70-304 ORDER ABATEMENT 70-C-19) SECTION 2 30" DAYS TO ABATE DISCUSSION BIB] 37659-U01 1970-U02 12-U02 16-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO9996-U03 DO10054-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1970 12 16 CC MIN(ÌìÕ¹peRegular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council &PQW7 December 16, 1970 Page 15 City Attorney Flandrick stated that the matter could be taken under submission and City Engineer French could be directed to advise the property owner that he had the right to file for a building regulation variance if he wished to do so. However, should there be a future assessment district formed he would be required to participate. Councilman Hamilton stated that he felt one fact was being overlooked and that was that Cosbey was part of a long street and if a11 the sidewalks were eliminated what the City was attempting to accomplish would be defeated and that a decision should be made on this case. MAYOR PRO TEM GREGORY CALLED FOR A ROLL CALL VOTE ON RESOLUTION NO. 70-304. AYES: COUNCILMEN KING, HAMILTON AND MAYOR PRO TEM GREGORY. NAYES: COUNCILMAN BLEWETT. ABSENT: MAYOR MCCARON. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on 70-C-20, to determine whether failure to construct certain street improvements constitute a public nuisance at 13550 Corak Street. Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. f City Engineer French stated this property needs curb, gutter and sidewalk as required by a building permit. He presented photographs of the property. As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to 70-C-20, Mayor pro tern declared the public hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 70-305 FINDING AND DETERMINING THE EXISTENCE OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING THE SAME ABATED 70-C-20) City Engineer French stated that in Section 2, a time limit of 30" days should be established. COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 70-305 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON SECONDED. Councilman Blewett stated that with the exception of the street being wider and one person having their sidewalk in, there was no difference between Corak Street and the Stancroft Street case and it was the obligation of Council to protect the rights of all citizens. City Engineer French stated that he would like to clarify the point that one property had curb and gutter, but not sidewalks. Councilman King stated that there was no petition filed and it was evident that the property owners did not care whether there were sidewalks installed or not and that it was preferable to have the improvements wherever the City could get them. Mayor pro tern Gregory stated that the Citv Council could not make decisions without knowing how the property owners felt and if they did not appear before Council or write a petition. Council could not try to outguess them. Continued) RES. NO. 70-304 ADOPTED PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC NUISANCE 70-C-20 POSTINGS, MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS RESUME PHOTOS PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED 70-C-20 RES. NO. 70-205 ORDER ABATEMENT 70-C-20) SECTION 2 30" DAYS TO ABATE DISCUSSION BIB] 37659-U01 1970-U02 12-U02 16-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO9996-U03 DO10054-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1970 12 16 CC MIN(ÌìÕ¹peCG(M6?78 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council December 16, 1970 Page 16 Mr. Lloyd Riggs requested permission to speak and stated that the Council appeared to be repetitious and they were getting nowhere. He stated that it was obvious that the property owners did not want sidewalks in or they would have put them in. Councilman King stated that the City had a policy to follow, curb, gutter and sidewalk throughout the community. He stated that in the interest of health and safety this was the Council's desire and the Planning Commission's desire. He stated that when a person builds or puts in improvements of $1000.00 or more, then curb, gutter and sidewalks are required. He stated that if a petition was filed by the people on the street, at that time, the sidewalk could be deleted, but uniformity throughout the City was the ultimate goal. MAYOR PRO TEM GREGORY CALLED FOR A ROLL CALL VOTE ON RESOLUTION NO. 70-305. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN KING, HAMILTON AND MAYOR PRO TEM GREGORY NAYES: COUNCILMAN BLEHETT ABSENT: MAYOR MCCARON 00- It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on 70-W-43, to hear objections or protests to the Report of Work of the City Manager regarding the amount of assessment for cleanup at 12690 west Ramona Blvd. Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. City Engineer French presented photographs of the property taken at the time of the initiation of the nuisance and photographs taken about 30 days after the cleanup of the property was completed. He stated the reason the cost was less than usual was because the property owner had completed part of the work. TESTIMONY WAS GIVEN BY: Mr. Matt Patritti, 16060 San Jose, La Puente, stated that this property had been cleaned up several times. He stated that he had sent some men down there and they had picked up the limbs that had been left there, however, there was a telephone pole and cement blocks that it was impossible to clean around. He stated that he had called the Phone Company three times in regard to this pole, before they finally removed it. He stated that his son had disced the property and was to have been at the meeting, but was unable to attend. He stated, further, that he had brought a tractor to the property to disc, but there was a truck belonging to the City already there, so he told them to go ahead and disc. He stated that it was worth more than the $60.00 involved for him to appear before Council to gripe". He objected to the $60.00 charge as he has his own tractor. Mayor pro tern Gregory stated that the City did have problems with vacant lots and when the property owners do not do the work, the City moved in. She stated that the City had this work done by people who were in the business and the cost was assessed to the property owner. Continued) RES. NO. 70-305 ADOPTED PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC NUISANCE 70-W-43 POSTINGS. MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PRRTESTS RESUME PHOTOS TESTIMONY MATT PATRITTI 16060 SAN JOSE LA PUENTE BIB] 37659-U01 1970-U02 12-U02 16-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO9996-U03 DO10054-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1970 12 16 CC MIN(ÌìÕ¹peRegular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council coo^e^^ December 16, 1970 Page 17 City Engineer French stated that there was an unsafe condition on the sidewalk as well as the weed problem. He stated that the City did get several prices and accepted the most competitive price before actually having the work done. This amounted to $45.00 and then there was the additional cost Of posting the property, setting the second hearing and handling the paper work which increased the cost to a total of $60.00. He stated that there was a period of 45 days from the date the property owner was notified until the actual work was accomplished. Mr. Patritti stated that, in the meantime, he had disced the property except where the pole was. As there was no one else in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to 70-W-43, Mayor pro tern Gregory declared the public hearing closed. It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on 70-W-48, to hear objections or protests to the Report of Work of the City Manager regarding the amount of assessment for cleanup at 1255 Maine Avenue. Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. City Engineer French stated that this work had been partially done by the property owner. He presented photographs and stated that the hand work was done by the City. As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to 70-W-48, Mayor pro tern Gregory declared the public hearing closed. It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on 70-W-58, to hear objections or protests to the Report of Work of the City Manager regarding the amount of assessment for cleanup at 1606-1612 Puente Avenue. Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests.' City Engineer French presented photographs and stated the work had been done in accordance with the instructions of the City Manager. As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to 70-W-58, Mayor pro tern Gregory declared the public hearing dosed. RESOLUTION NO. 70-306 CONFIRMING THE CITY MANAGER'S REPORT REGARDING CERTAIN SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 70-W-43, 48 & 58) COUNCILMAN BLEWETT MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 70-306 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING GE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. Councilman Blewett requested permission to direct a question to Mr. Patritti. He stated that he understood Mr. Patritti owned considerable property on Patritti Street and that as a source of public nuisance he felt this rated second in the City to the far North end of town. He asked Mr. Pacritti if there would be any way he could use his influence with the people in that area to improve the situation. Mr. Patritti stated that he did everything possible but once the people got V.A. loans it made them hard to handle because they Continued PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED 70-W-43 PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC NUISANCE 70-W-48 POSTINGS. MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS RESUME PHOTOS PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED 70-W-48 PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC NUISANCC 70-W-58 POSTINGS, MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS i RESUME PHOTOS' PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED 70-W-58 RES. NO. 70-306^ CONFIRMING REPORT 70-W-43, 48 & 58) RES. NO. 70-306 ADOPTED BIB] 37659-U01 1970-U02 12-U02 16-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO9996-U03 DO10054-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1970 12 16 CC MIN(ÌìÕ¹pe0004680 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council December 16, 1970 Page 18 owned the property together with the government. He stated that he was willing to help the people clean the property up but that one day the property would be dean and the next time he was in the area it would be in the same condition it was before. Councilman Blewett stated that since Mr. Patritti was interested in building and since he did bui'.d the nicer houses he felt Baldwin Park might have a decent market and he suggested that Mr. Patritti consider doing more building in Baldwin Park. Mr. Patritti stated that he agreed with Councilman Blewett and he felt a good job was being done in cleaning up Baldwin Park. 00- Councilman King stated that the report he received from the Police Department was adequate and he was satisfied with the report as submitted. 00- City Attorney Flandrick presented Ordinance No. 579 for ORDINANCE NO. 579 first reading and stated that since the Ordinance was adopting ADOPT UNIFORM CODES Uniform Codes, it required a public hearing. He recommended P.H. JANUARY 6, 1971 that January 6, 1971 be the date for the hearing. ORDINANCE NO. 579 ADOPTING, BY REFERENCE, CERTAIN CODES. TO WIT: 1) THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, 1970 EDITION, VOLUME I"; 2) THE UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE, 1970 EDITION. VOLUME II"; 3) THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, 1970 EDITION, VOLUME III, ENTITLED HOUSING'"; 4) THE UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE, 1970 EDITION; 5) THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, VOLUME V, ENTITLED SIGNS'; AND 6) THE UNIFORM SWIMMING POOL CODE, 1970 EDITION. COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT FURTHER READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 579 BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 579 BE INTRODUCED. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. FURTHER READING WAIVED ORD. NO. 579 ORD. NO. 579 INTRODUCED 00- ORDINANCE NO. 582 AMENDING THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL ORD. NO. 582 ADOPT CODE BY ADOPTING THE PUBLIC HEALTH CODE OF THE L.A. PUBLIC HEALTH COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES", THE SAME BEING ORDINANCE CODE NO. 7583 City Attorney Flandrick recommended that the public hearing be set for January 6, 1971. COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT FURTHER READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 582 BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 582 BE INTRODUCED. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- RESOLUTION NO. 70-310 APPOINTING ENGINEER OF WORK FOR WALNUT STREET ASSESSMENT DISTRICT P.H. JANUARY 6, 1971 FURTHER READING WAIVED ORD. NO. 582 ORD. NO. 582 INTRODUCED RES. NO. 70-310 WALNUT ST. A/D APPOINT ENGINEER Continued) BIB] 37659-U01 1970-U02 12-U02 16-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO9996-U03 DO10054-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1970 12 16 CC MIN(ÌìÕ¹peRegular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 70-310 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 000^681 December 16, 1970 Page 19 RES. NO. 70-310 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 70-311 APPOINTING SPECIAL COUNSEL TO PREPARE PROCEEDINGS AND AUTHORIZING AGREEMENT FOR THAT CERTAIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT KNOWN AS WALNUT STREET ASSESSMENT DISTRICT COUNCILMAN HAMILTON MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 70-311 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. RESOLUTION NO. 70-312 ORDERING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THAT CERTAIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT KNOWN AS WALNUT STREET ASSESSMENT DISTRICT COUNCILMAN HAMILTON MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 70-312 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. RESOLUTION NO. 70-313 ADOPTING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THAT CERTAIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT KNOWN AS WALNUT STREET ASSESSMENT DISTRICT COUNCILMAN BLEWETT MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 70-313 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. City Attorney Flandrick stated the report, plans and specifications were before the Council this evening. RESOLUTION NO. 70-314 APPROVING RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITIONS IN CONNECTION WITH WALNUT STREET ASSESSMENT DISTRICT COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 70-314 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. RESOLUTION NO. 70-315 ORDERING A REPORT UNDER THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT INVESTIGATION, LIMITATION AND MAJORITY PROTEST ACT OF 1931, RELATING TO WALNUT STREET ASSESSMENT DISTRICT COUNCILMAN HAMILTON MOVED THAT RESOLNTTO'; NO. 70-315 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. RESOLUTION NO. 70-316 APPROVING REPORT AND FIXING TIME AND PLACE OF HEARING THEREON WALNUT STREET ASSESSt^NT DISTRICT) COUNCILMAN BLEWETT MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 70-316 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. Continued) RES. NO. 70-311 WALNUT ST. A/D APPOINT OMSEL RES. NO. 70-311 ADOPTED RES. NO. 70-312 WALNUT ST. A/D ORDER PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS RES. NO. 70-312 ADOPTED RES. NO. 70-313 WALNUT ST. A/D ADOPT PLAN & SPECIFICATIONS RES. NO. 70-313 ADOPTED RES. NO. 70-314 WALNUT ST.A/D APPROVE RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITIONS RES. NO. 70-314 ADOPTED RES. NO. 70-315 WALNUT ST. A/D ORDER REPORT RE'. INVESTIGATION. LIMITATION & MAJORITY PROTEST ACT k RES. NO. 70-315 ADOPTED RES. NO. 70-316 WALNUT ST. A/D APPROVE REPORT & SET HEARING DATE JANUARY 20. 1970 RES. NO. 70-316 ADOPTED BIB] 37659-U01 1970-U02 12-U02 16-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO9996-U03 DO10054-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1970 12 16 CC MIN(ÌìÕ¹peOG04682 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council RESOLUTION NO. 70-317 DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER CONSTRUCTION IN WALNUT STREET AND APPURTENANT WORK; DESCRIBING THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT; DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN LANDS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS; DECLARING THE WORK TO BE OP MORE THAN LOCAL OR ORDINARY PUBLIC BENEFIT; SPECIFYING THE EXTERIOR BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT TO BE BENEFITED BY SAID WORK AND TO BE ASSESSED TO PAY THE COST AND EXPENSE THEREOF; DESIGNATING SAID DISTRICT AS WALNUT STREET ASSESSMENT DISTRICT"; DETERMINING THAT THESE PROCEEDINGS SHALL BE CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO THE IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1911"; AND FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO COUNCILMAN HAMILTON MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 70-317 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. Councilman Gregory stated that she is a property owner on Walnut Street and resides in the district. December 16, 1970 Page 20 RES. NO. 70-317 WALNUT ST. A/D DECLARING INTENT AND SETTING PUBLIC HEARING 1/20/71 RES. NO. 70-317 ADOPTED MAYOR PRO TEM GREGORY OWNER & RESIDENT IN DISTRICT 00- City Attorney Flandrick stated that he had received in the mail a copy of Phi Hip Watson's latest proposal for an initiative tax measure which may be placed on the ballot in November. He stated that the propc'*a1, in part, was desirable as a property tax relief, however, the manner in which it is worded may present serious problems to public agencies and to Cities. He stated that Mr. Watson had indicated that he would accept constructive criticism in terms of the language and the concepts, if these criticisms were submitted some time prior to January 1, 1971. Mr. Gordon McGintey, President of the Los Angeles Division of the League, indicated that if several Cities would make a request, he would form a committee of several attorneys, managers and mayors to review the matter with Mr. Watson and make recommendations for any changes that might be appropriate. City Attorney Flandrick recommended that City Manager Nordby be authorized to contact Mr. Me Ginley and request that a study committee be formed. There were no objections. 00- City Manager Nordby commended City Clerk Balkus on the Holiday art work on the agenda. 00- City Manager Nordby presented a resolution supporting the Holiday Safety Program of the National Safety Council RESOLUTION NO. 70-307 SUPPORTING THE HOLIDAY SAFETY PROGRAM OF THE NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL WATSON'S TAX MEASURE CITY MANAGER TO CONTACT MR. MC GINLEY. PRES. LEAGUE. RE STUDY COWITTEE COUNCILMAN BLEWETT MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 70-307 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- City Manager Nordby stated that for the information of the Council, Mayor pro tern Gregory had been appointed delegate RES. NO. 70-307 SUPPORT HOLIDAY PROGRAM NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL RES. NO. 70-307 ADOPTED Continued) BIB] 37659-U01 1970-U02 12-U02 16-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO9996-U03 DO10054-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1970 12 16 CC MIN(ÌìÕ¹pe0004683 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council December 16, 1970 Page 21 to the Los Angeles Comprehensive Health Planning Association Board of Directors, the League of California Cities and also, Chairman of the Underground!ng Utilities Committee. City Manager Nordby stated that while the talk was centered on honors, he would like to bring up the fact that the new president of the San Gabriel Valley Police Chiefs Association was Chief Ernest Aguirre of Irwindale, and that Baldwin Park's own Chief of Police Dale Adams was just completing his year of service as president of the organization. 00- City Clerk Balkus recommended that a Temporary Use Permit be TUP FOR SALE OF XMAS granted to Tony Virgil, 12710 E. Ramona Blvd. for the sale TREES TONY VIRGIL of Christmas Trees. She stated that the Temporary Use Permit fee and Business License had been paid and the applicant had insurance coverage. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT MOVED THAT THE TEMPORARY USE PERMIT FOR TUP APPROVED THE SALE OF CHRISTMAS TREES BE GRANTED TO TONY VIRGIL. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- Mayor pro tern Gregory stated that she had had a discussion MRS. GRAY with Mrs. Gray, who was seated in the audience in regard WALNUT ST. A/D to having curbs, gutters and sidewalks installed by her own contractor. She asked City Engineer French to clarify this point for Mrs. Gray. City Engineer French stated that the problem was, that in the formation of an assessment district you must have a cut off time before the formation of the district and you must establish the work that was to be done by the assessment district. He stated that this was required by law and the work must be done alt at one time and coordinated, therefore individual permits were no longer being issued because final plans and specifications must be presented to Council at the time of the initiation of the work. He stated that, at this time, the work must be done by the district and processed through the district; that letters had been sent to all property owners in the district allowing them ample time to make arrangements with their own contractor. City Engineer French stated that the tow bid would be accepted; that estimated costs would be mailed to the property owners in the near future, however, it would be about 60 days before the City would have a firm bid price. He informed Mrs. Gray that sidewalks were not part of the assessment district in her area but she could have them installed at the same time by a private contractor or the contractor who was completing the work for the City. 00- CUy Engineer French presented a report of work completed REPORT OF WORK on: 70-S-14, West side of Bleecker Street between Downing 70-S-14, 26. 27. Avenue and Nubia Street; 70-S-26, East side of Bleecker 29 & 30 Street between Nubia Street and Olive Street; 70-S-27. North side of Olive Street between Elizabeth Avenue and Bogart Avenue; 70-S-29, Southwest side of Grdce Avenue between Ramona Boulevard and Athol Street and 70-S-30, South side of Palm Avenue between Benham Avenue and La Rica Avenue. Continued) BIB] 37659-U01 1970-U02 12-U02 16-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO9996-U03 DO10054-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1970 12 16 CC MIN(ÌìÕ¹pe0004684 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council RESOLUTION NO. 70-294 SETTING A HEARING DATE FOR ANY PROTESTS OR OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORTS OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS 70-S-14, 26. 27, 29 & 30) COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 70-294 BE ADOPTED l AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- City Engineer French reviewed his report on the initiation of Public Nuisance Case Nos. 70-N-87. 3419-21 Frazier Street; 70-N-91. 3409-13 Frazier Street; 70-N-92, 3834-36 Vineland Avenue; 70-N-94, 13146 Francisquito Avenue; 70-N-95, 15000 Nubia Street; 70-N-97, 3509 Maine Avenue; 70-N-100, 3317 N. Baldwin Park Boulevard; 70-N-101, 12827 Waltham Street; 70-N-103, 14442 Merced Avenue; 70-N-104, 13419 Los Angeles Street; 70-N-105, 14337 Scott Place; 70-N-106, 14930 E. Pacific Avenue; 70-N-107, 1402-02-1/2 Virginia Avenue and 70-N-108, 1406 Virginia Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 70-308 SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A HEARING TO DETERMINE WHETHER CERTAIN BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES CONSTITUTE PUBLIC NUISANCES 70-N-87. 91, 92, 94, 95. 97. 100, 101, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107 & 108) COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 70-308 BE ADOPTED AND'THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. City Engineer French reviewed his report on the initiation of Public Nuisance Vehicle Case Nos. 70-A-62. 4848-52 Elizabeth Avenue and 70-A-63, 4228 Center Street. RESOLUTION NO. 70-309 SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A HEARING TO DETERMINE WHETHER CERTAIN VEHICLES CONSTITUTE A PUBLIC NUISANCE 70-A-62 & 63) COUNCILMAN BLEWETT MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 70-309 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- City Engineer French presented a request for an award of the Open End Curb and Gutter) Contract for 1971. He stated that bids were opened on November 30, 1970, four bids were received and the low bidder was J.O. Castaneda and Sons, Pomona. He stated further that next year's bids were approximately 20% higher than they were in 1970 and it was basically labor increases. He recommended that award be made to J.O. Castaneda and Sons in accordance with their low bid and the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the contract. Continued) December 16. 1970 Page 22 RES. NO. 70-294 SET HEARING DATE 70-S-14, 26, 27, 29 S 30) P.H. JANUARY 20, 1971 RES. NO. 70-294 ADOPTED PUBLIC NUISANCE INITIATION 70-N-87, 70-N-91, 70-N-92, 70-N-94, 70-N-95, 70-N-97. 70-N-100. 70-N-101, 70-N-103. 70-N-104, 70-N-105. 70-N-106. 70-N-107 & 70-N-108 RES. NO. 70-308 SET HEARING DATE 70-N-87, 91. 92, 94. 95. 97. 100. 101. 103. 104. 105. 106, 107 & 108) P.H. JANUARY 6. 1971 RES. NO. 70-308 ADOPTED PUBLIC NUISANCE VEHICLE 70-A-62 & 70-A-63 RES. NO. 70-309 SET HEARING DATE 70-A-62 & 63) P.H. JANUARY 20, 1971 RES. NO. 70-309 ADOPTED OPEN END CONTRACT 1971 CURB & GUTTER) BIB] 37659-U01 1970-U02 12-U02 16-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO9996-U03 DO10054-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1970 12 16 CC MIN(ÌìÕ¹pe00(M695 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council December 16, 1970 Page 23 AWARDED TO J.O. CASTANEDA & SONS & MAYOR & CITY CLERK AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE CONTRACT COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT THE CONTRACT FOR OPEN END CURB AND GUTTER FOR 1971 BE AWARDED TO J.O. CASTANEDA & SONS, POMONA IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR LOW BID AND THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK BE AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON SECONDED. Roll Call. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- RESOLUTION NO. 70-295 ADOPTING A SCHEDULE OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS CHARGES RES. NO. 70-295 ADOPT SCHEDULE OF CHARGES RES. NO. 70-295 ADOPTED COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 70-295 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON SECONDED. Roll Call. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. Councilman Btewett stated that he felt 20% was a substantial increase. Councilman King stated that due tc current unemployment he felt the bids would be based on a more competitive price. 00- Planning Director Chivetta reported that Planning Commissioner PLAN. COMMISSIONER Robert McCord's term of office would expire February 2, 1971. ROBERT MCCORD'S TERM Office No. Ill) TO EXPIRE 2/2/71 Mayor pro tern Gregory stated that if the Council was agreeable the matter would be hald over until there was a full Council. 00- Planning Director Chivetta presented the Planning Comnission's REPORT RE Z-329 report on Z-329 Southern Pacific Railroad property Zone change from C-1 and C-2 to R-3 on Ramona Blvd. He stated that the Planning Commission reaffirmed their previous recommendation to reclassify alt R-1 property to R-3 and the C-2 portion of property between La Rica Avenue and Stewart to R-3. City Attorney Flandrick stated that the Planning Commission had recommended that alt the property be rezoned to R-3. At the last Council meeting the Council had indicated that a portion of the property was not to be rezoned to R-3. That portion being that parcel tying between La Rica Avenue and Stewart Avenue, presently zoned C-2. COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT THE PREPARATION OF AN ORDINANCE BE DIRECTED, RECLASSIFYING ALL OF THE PROPERTIES FROM THEIR PRESENT ZONES TO R-3 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S RECOWENDATION. SECOND READING WILL BE WITHHELD PENDING PRECISE ZONING. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. Roll Call. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES COUNCILMEN KING. BLEWETT AND MAYOR PRO TEM GREGORY NAYES COUNCILMAN HAMILTON ABSENT MAYOR MCCARON 00- ORDINANCE NO. 580 ADDING PART II TO CHAPTER 6 OF ARTICLE VI OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO FRANCHISES COUNCILMAN BLEWETT MOVED THAT FURTHER READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 580 BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. ORD. TO BE PREPARED RECLASSIFYING ALL PROPERTIES TO R-3 SECOND READING HELD PENDING PRECISE ZONING ORD. NO. 580 RE FRANCHISES FURTHER READING WAIVED ORD. NO. 580 Continued) BIB] 37659-U01 1970-U02 12-U02 16-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO9996-U03 DO10054-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1970 12 16 CC MIN(ÌìÕ¹peCCC4686 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council December 16, 1970 Page 24 ORD. NO. 580 ADOPTED COUNCILMAN BLEWETT MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 580 BE ADOPTED. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- City Manager Nordby reported that he and City Attorney Flandrick had attended the last session the Charter Commission. He stated that it was a very knowledgeable Commission and as discussions proceed he suggested that if and when the Council was able they attend a meeting. He stated that every point was studied very minutely by the Commission. Councilman King commended City Clerk Balkus on the efficient manner in which she presented the Charter Commission minutes. Councilman Blewett brought up the matter of the comments in the Tribune the previous Sunday regarding the Baldwin Park Police Department. He stated that he felt some of the comments were certainly unfounded and he suggested that if some of these people had something to say they should approach the Council. Councilman King stated that the reports received from the Police Department were adequate and he had no further concern. He stated that Council had received all the necessary information in regard to this particular issue and he felt this matter had been resolved. Mayor pro tern Gregory stated that, although the allegations may have been unfounded the citizens involved were concerned and she felt more citizens should be concerned about our government and she was glad they were interested. She agreed that either City Manager Mordby or the Council should have been approached directly, so that any misunderstanding could'be resolved. Councilman Hamilton stated that he felt Mayor pro tern Gregorys statements were very well put. He stated that when rumors were started it was important to check statements and get information from both sides before public statements were made. Mayor pro tern Gregory thanked everyone for their cooperation and wished a11 a Merry Christmas. 00- AT 10:58 P.M. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADJOURNED 10:58 P.M ADJOURN. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. There wefe no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- THELMA L. SALkUS. CITV CLERK APPROVED: /-^ 1971 Date of Distribution to City Council: /^—^/ Date of Distribution to Departments: /y2 3 y 1970 1970 BIB] 37659-U01 1970-U02 12-U02 16-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO9996-U03 DO10054-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1970 12 16 CC MIN(ÌìÕ¹peCITY OF BALDWIN PARK BID OPENING Concrete Work Various Locations within the City) From January 1, 1971 to December 31, 1971 NOVEMBER 30, 1970 2:15 P.M. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS J. 0. Castaneda & Sons P.O. Box 2341 Pomona, California J. B. Crosby Co., Inc. 8361 Moody Street La Patma, California 90620 Sully-Miller Contracting Co. 3000 East South Street P.O. Box 53S9 Long Beach, California 90805 Crowelt & Larson P.O. Box 459 Baldwin Park, California 91706 ITEM 1. QUANTI-500 rvLin Ft UNIT PRICE T$ OTAL UNI PRI T CE TOTAL $ 1,250.00 UN PR$2 IT ICE.25 TOTAL $ 1,125.00 UNIT PRICE $1.95 975.00 $2. 50 $2.20 2. 12,000 Lin Ft $2.45 $29 400.00 $2. 50 $30.000.00 $3 25 $39,000.00 $3.50 3. 2,000 Lin Ft $2.40 $ 4 800.00 $2. 50 $ 5,000.00 $3 15 $ 6,300.00 $3.50 4. 40,000 Sq Ft $ 48 $19 200.00 $ 50 $20,000.00 $ 68 $27,200.00 $ 72 5. 24,000 Sq Ft $ 58 $13,920.00 $ 80 $19,200.00 $ 75 $18,000.00 $ 90 6. 1,000 Lin Ft $ 90 $ 900.00 $1. 50 $ 1,500.00 $1 00 $ 1,000.00 $1.30 7. TOTAL 3,200 Sq Ft $ 95 $ 3,040.00 $1. 05 $ 3,360.00 $ 85 $ 2,720.00 $1.25 $72 235.00 $80,310.00 $95,345.00 10% Bid Bond TOTAL $ 1,100.00 $ 42,000.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 28,800.00 $ 21,600.00 $ 1,300.00 $ 4,000.00 $105,800.00 10% Bid Bond I, THELMA L. BALKUS, CITY CLERK of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby Certify that I opened the foregoing bids in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 2:15 p.m., November 30, 1970, in the presence of City Manager Nordby, City Engineer French, Assistant City Engineer Gordon, Office Engineer Caresio and Street Superintendent Crawford. THELMA L. BALKUS, CITY CLERK BIB] 37659-U01 1970-U02 12-U02 16-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9994-U03 FO9996-U03 DO10054-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06