HomeMy WebLinkAbout1971 01 20 CC MIN1971 01 20 CC MIN (Ìì Ù + peI_ N_ D_ L X
JANUARY 20, 197
P^ic
Treasurer Absence Excused
Oath Patrolmen Carmine Lanza and William Hornsby
Service Pins Presented 1
Treasurer's Report 12/31/70 Received and Filed 1
Res. No. 71-23 Claims & Demands Adopted 1
70-N-102 1324 Virginia 2
Testimony Jay Wyne 2
Res. No. 71-24 70-N-102) Adopted also amended Staff Report 2
70-N-107 & 70-N-108 Postponed to later in evening 3
Res. No. 71-25 70-A-60) Adopted 3
AZC-43 On-Premise Signs 3
AZC-43 Hearing continued to February 3, 1971 4
MO-2 Appeal Seaside Oil 4
Testimony J. W. Maddox b
Appeal MO-2 Denied 6
70-N-107 & 70-N-108 Virginia Avenue) 6
Testimony Robert S. Funk 6 & 7
Res. No. 71-26 70-N-107) Adopted Amend Staff Report 8
Res. No. 71-27 70-N-108) Adopted 8
Res. No. 71-22 70-S-14, 26, 27, 29 & 30) Adopted 9
70-A-63 Testimony 9
Res. No. 71-28 70-A-63) Adopted 9
Z-330 C-2 A) to C-2 10 11
Testimony Jay Angelo 12 & 14
Maggie McDevitt 12
Arthur Betts 12
Bernard Pert in 12 & 13
Jack Wattet 13
Frank Bernato 14
Don Barnes 14
Mrs. Ralph Farmer 14
Harold Andrews 14
Public Hearing Z-330 Continued to February 17. 1971 16
Walnut Street A/D Continued to February 3, 1971 16
T.U.P. Chamber of Commerce Carnival, Sidewalk Sale and Parade
Granted; Fees Waived 16
Res. No. 71-29 TASC & SCAG Merger Adopted 16
Res. No. 71-30 Object to Rate Increase So. Cal. Edison Adopted 17
Res. No. 71-31 Protest County Tax Rate & Urging Legislature to
Provide Funds for State Programs Adopted 17
Contract Central Park West Awarded to Landscape Services, Monrovia 1^
Ord. No. 584 Adds MC Section 2925 Community Redevelopment Agency
Introduced i9
Res. No. 71-32 70-N-36) Adopted 19
Res. No. 71-33 71-A-5 & 6) Adopted 19
Agreement Storm Drain Municipal Engrg. Consultants Siqnatures Auth. 19
P.M. 781 R. Scott 4723 Stewart Approved 20
Res. No. 71-34 Granting ZV-232 Adopted 20
Ord. No. 585 R-1 to M-1 Z-328 Part I) Introduced 20
Ord. No. 586 R-1 to M-1 Z-328 Part II) ntroduced Hold Second Reading 21
Mrs. E. Igna Trailer Park Attorney to Advise Attorney for Mrs. Igna
and Mrs. Igna of 10 days to apply 21
Adjournment 10:07 P.M. 22
BIB]
37659-U01
1971-U02
01-U02
20-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9591-U03
FO9838-U03
DO9971-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
2/6/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1971 01 20 CC MIN (Ìì Ù + pe1C 04721
REGULAR MEETING OF THE BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER) 14403 East Pacr-fic Avenue
In accordance with Section 2703 of the Mumcipat Code
the City Council met in open meeting at 7:00 p.m. in
the Conference Room for an informal session with the
staff to be informed on regular agenda items.
The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park met in
regular session at the above place at 7:30 p.m.
Councilman Gregory led the salute to the flag.
Roll Call: Present: COUNCILMEN BLEWETT. GREGORY,
HAMILTON, KING AND MAYOR MCCARON
CITY MANAGER NORDBY, CITY
ATTORNEY FLANDRICK, CITY
ENGINEER FRENCH, PLANNING
DIRECTOR CHIVETTA. FINANCE
DIRECTOR DUNCAN, CHIEF OF
POLICE ADAMS AND CITY
CLERK BALKUS
Also Present:
Absent: CITY TREASURER CODLING
00-
COUNCILMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT CITY TREASURER CODLING BE
EXCUSED. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no
objections. The motion carried and was so ordered.
00-
OTRUARY 20, 1971
7:30 P.M.
FLAG SALUTE
ROLL CALL
CITY TREASURER
CODLING EXCUSED
City Clerk Balkus administered the Oath of Office to
Patrolmen William Hornsby and Carmine Lanza, following
which the Mayor presented the men with their badges and
congratulated them.
00-
Mayor McCaron presented City employees with ten, five,
and one-year service pins. He congratulated the employees
thanked them for their fine service to the City.
00-
Approval of the Minutes of the meeting of January 6, 1971
was postponed until the next meeting. There were no
objections.
OATH OF OFFICE
PATROLMEN WILLIAM
HORNSBY AND
CARMINE LANZA
SERVICE PINS
PRESENTED TO
EMPLOYEES
APPROVAL OF
JAN. 6 MINUTES
POSTPONED
COUNCILMAN GREGORY
AS OF DECEMBER 31,
BLEWETT SECONDED.
carried and was so
00-
MOVED THAT THE CITY TREASURER'S REPORT,
1970, BE RECEIVED AND FILED. COUNCILMAN
There were no objections. The motion
ordered.
TREASURER'S REPORT
12/31/70 RECEIVED
AND FILED
00-
RESOLUTION NO. 71-23 ALLOWING CLAIMS AND DEMANDS
AGAINST THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
COUNCILMAN HAMILTON MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 71-23 BE
ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN
KING SECONDED. Roll Call. There were no objections.
The motion carried and was so ordered.
00-
RES. NO. 71-23
CLAIMS AND DEMANDS
1779 1960
PAYROLL PERIOD
12/16/70 12/31/70
RES. NO. 71-23
ADOPTED
BIB]
37659-U01
1971-U02
01-U02
20-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9591-U03
FO9838-U03
DO9971-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
2/6/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1971 01 20 CC MIN (Ìì Ù + peQtW^ZZ^
Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council
City Clerk Balkus administered the oath to those in the
audience desiring to be heard during the meeting.
00-
PUBLIC HEARINGS
7:30 p.m. having arrived it was the time and place fixed
for a continued public hearing on 70-N-102, to determine
whether certain premises and buildings and structures
constitute a public nuisance at 1324 Virginia Avenue.
Continued from January 6, 1971)
Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished.
There were no written protests.
City Attorney Flandrick stated that this Case had been
continued from the January 6, 1971 meeting. He stated
that, after consultation between the City Manager, the
Planning Director, the City Engineer and the City
Attorney, the Staff recommendation is as follows: the
applicant agrees that the property in its present
condition constitutes a public nuisance; to abate that
nuisance he has indicated his agreement to the demolition
of the two structures to the rear, one being an alleged
residential structure, and the other being a garage, all
within a period of 60 days, and he will also remodel the
forward building, the one closest to Virginia Avenue, to
meet the existing building regulations and zoning
regulations of the City within the 60 days.
TESTIMONY WAS GIVEN BY:
Mr. Jay Wyne, 1963 S. Myrtle Avenue, Monrovia, testified
that he understood the City Attorney's statement, and that
he would concur.
As there was no one else in the audience desiring to speak
either in behalf of or in opposition to 70-N-102, Mayor
McCaron declared the public hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 71-24 FINDING AND DETERMINING THE
EXISTENCE OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING THE
SAME ABATED 70-N-102)
City Attorney Ftandrick stated that the Staff report
referred to in the Resolution is amended as stated above.
City Engineer French stated that in Section 2, a time
limit of 6011 days should be inserted.
COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 71-24 AND THE
AMENDED STAFF REPORT BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING
BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN HAMITLON SECONDED.
Councilman Btewett. noting the property was zoned M-1,
inquired whether the applicant was aware he would be
putting money into a non-conforming use. City Attorney
Flandrick stated that Mr. Wyne had been made aware of
that provision of the Code which indicates that work
done of this type does not have the effect of extending
in any way the period of abatement, and it was Mr. Wyne's
decision to qo ahead with the work.
January 20, 1971
Page 2
OATH
PUBLIC HEARINGS
7:30 P.M.
PUBLIC HEARING
PUBLIC NUISANCE
70-N-102
POSTINGS & MAILINGS
NO WRITTEN PROTESTS
RESUME
TESTIMONY
JAY WYNE
1963 S. MYRTLE AVENUE
MONROVIA
PUBLIC HEARING
DECLARED CLOSED
70-N-102
RES. NO. 71-24
ORDER ABATEMENT
70-N-102)
SECTION 2
60" DAYS TO ABATE
DISCUSSION
There were no objections.
ordered.
The motion carried and was so
RES. NO. 71-24 &
AMENDED STAFF REPORT
ADOPTED
00-
BIB]
37659-U01
1971-U02
01-U02
20-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9591-U03
FO9838-U03
DO9971-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
2/6/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1971 01 20 CC MIN (Ìì Ù + pe000a?728
Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council
City Attorney Flandrick requested that items 70-N-107 and
70-N-108 be postponed until later in the evening, as the
owner of the property was not yet present. There were no
objections.
00-
It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on
70-A-60, to determine whether certain vehicles constitute
a public nuisance at 3654 Barnes Avenue. Continued from
January 6, 1971)
Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished.
There were no written protests.
City Engineer French referred to photographs which had
been shown at the last meeting. He stated the vehicles
referred to were a 1955 Chevrolet panel truck, and a travel
trailer which is in excess of 24 feet in length. The owner
has agreed to remove the truck. The City Engineer
recommended the owner be required to removed the trailer or
conform to the Zoning Code in the proper placement of the
trailer. City Engineer French stated this matter had been
held over from the last meeting in order for the owner to
meet with the Planning Department and the Enforcement
Officer. The owner understands that to keep the trailer
on the property he will have to conform to the Zonihg Code.
As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak
either in behalf of or in opposition to 70-A-60, Mayor
McCaron declared the public hearing dosed.
RESOLUTION NO. 71-25 FINDING AND DETERMINING THE
EXISTENCE OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING THE
SAME ABATED 70-A-60)
City Engineer French stated that in Section 2, a time
limit of 60" days should be inserted.
COUNCILMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 71-25 BE
ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN
BLEWETT SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion
carried and was so ordered.
00-
It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on
Case AZC-43, proposed amendments to the On-Premise Sign
Ordinance. Continued from January 6, 1971)
Planning Director stated that at an adjourned meeting on
January 12, 1971, the Council considered some of the problems
pertaining to the On-Premise Sign Ordinance, as follows:
1) Freestanding Signs--!t was determined these should be
limited to one square foot of sign face area for each lineal
foot of property frontage, but not to exceed 400 square feet;
2) Roof Signs—will be permitted if freestanding sicns
cannot be erected, subject to a special use permit. Roof
signs would be limited to 50% of the total sign face area
permitted; 3) Projection Signs—wilt be permitted, but
limited to 18 inches maximum projection from the face of
the building; 4) Amortization Schedule—ail non-conforming
signs would have to be removed within five years, or when
the building is remodeled or rehabilitated where the cost
of same exceeds $1000.00; 5) Construction Signs—wilt be
limited to 32 square feet of sign face area maximum; and
6) Subdivision Signs—applicant wi11 be required to file
with the City a $500.00 filing fee to insure sign removal
after the last lot or dwelling in the subdivision is sold.
Continued)
January 20, 1971
Page 3
70-N-107 & 70-N-108
POSTPONED
PUBLIC HEARING
PUBLIC NUISANCE
70-A-60
POSTINGS & MAILINGS
NO WRITTEN PROTESTS
RESUME
PUBLIC HEARING
DECLARED CLOSED
70-A-60
RES. NO. 71-25
ORDER ABATEMENT
70-A-60)
SECTION 2
60" DAYS TO ABATE
RES. NO. 71-25
ADOPTED
PUBLIC HEARING
ON-PREMISE SIGNS
CASE NO. AZC-43
RESUME
BIB]
37659-U01
1971-U02
01-U02
20-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9591-U03
FO9838-U03
DO9971-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
2/6/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1971 01 20 CC MIN (Ìì Ù + pe00^^
Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council
January 20, 1971
Page 4
Planning Director Chivetta stated he felt the Ordinance
is something that will be of benefit to the communtiy; it
has been approved in sum and substance by the California
Electric Sign Association and the Chamber of Commerce,
and his recommendation was that the amendments be included
in the final draft of the Ordinance for presentation to
the Council for approval.
Councilman Hamilton asked whether there would be a cost
for a conditional use permit for a roof sign where
there could be no freestanding sign. Planning Director
Chivetta stated there would be no cost; It would just be
a review procedure.
Mayor McCaron directed Planning Director Chivetta to
have the Ordinance as amended drawn up in its entirety
for presentation to Council at the next meeting. He
continued the public hearing until the February 3, 1971
meeting. There were no objections.
DISCUSSION
PUBLIC-HEARING
CONTINUED UNTIL
FEB. 3. 1971 MEETING
It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on
MO-2, an appeal to modify Resolution PC70-31 of Case
No. CP-147 to acquire a ten-month delay in implementing
the conditions set forth in said Resolution on certain
real property located in a C-2 Zone at 13952 Ramona Blvd.
Applicant Seaside Oil Company. Continued from
January 6, 1971)
Proper publication, postings and mailings had been
accomplished.
There were no written protests.
Planning Director Chivetta explained that this matter had
been continued from the January 6, 1971 ineeting. This was
an appeal filed by the applicant requesting that the Council
set aside the Commission's denial of it's request to modify
a condition of approval for a conditional use permit for a
service'station. The applicant at the Planning Commission
hearing on CP-147 agreed to the conditions of approval
which they now feel are unreasonable, in view of the money
they would have to spend to comply with the Conmission's
conditions of approval, and this expense could not be
amortized over the ten-year lease that they have remaining
for the use of the property. The property is located on
the southwesterly side of Stewart Avenue and Ramona Blvd.
It is a non-conforming station by reason that it does not
have a conditional use permit. The Municipal Code provides
that when a non-conforming use is abandoned for a six-months
period or longer, this use shall be brought into compliance
with the Municipal Code or be razed. This is what the
Planning Commission requested of the applicant, and the
applicant feels this is unreasonable.
Subsequent to a Public Hearing conducted by the Planning
Commission, the applicant said he had development plans
for the property, and that he would comply with the Code.
The Resolution was drafted and submitted to Seaside Oil
for approval. They responded they did not want to comply
until the ten months was up because of street alignment
taking place on Ramona Blvd. As a result of non-compliance
by the applicant, the Commission denied the delay. The
applicant is now appealing that denial.
Planning Director Chivetta posted on the wall an artist's
conception of a rendering Seaside presented to the Planning
Commission and agreed to accomplish within the time limits
of the conditional use permit approval. Seaside 011 had
Continued)
PUBLIC HEARING
MO-2
SEASIDE OIL CO.
PUBLICATION, POSTINGS
& MAILINGS
NO WRITTEN PROTESTS
RESUME
BIB]
37659-U01
1971-U02
01-U02
20-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9591-U03
FO9838-U03
DO9971-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
2/6/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1971 01 20 CC MIN (Ìì Ù + peRegular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council January 20, 1971
Page 5
proposed to rehabilitate the building into a Spanish style
motif, which would be complimentary to the Luck Discount
Store and the McDonald's Restaurant on the corner of
Stewart and Ramona Blvd. The Commission denied thir, claim
based on the development taking place in the area, namely
the Lucky Discount Store, a half-million dollar development,
the McDonald's Restaurant, at $200,000.00, and the
$3,000,000.00 proposal of Ramona Blvd. alignment.
TESTIMONY WAS GIVEN BY: TESTIMONY IN FAVOR
J. W. Maddox, 330 State Street, Santa Barbara, was present J. W. MADDOX
to represent Seaside Oil Company. He stated that there 330 STATE STREET
was in effect a rehabilitation of alt service stations in SANTA BARBARA
the City of Baldwin Park, which was passed almost five
years ago. The five year limit for remodeling will be up
in October 1971, at which time, if the station were
presently operating. Seaside would be remodeling the
station, as required by the present Ordinance. He stated
he was under the impression that Seaside's biggest competitor,
the Sky Power Station, would also be required to remodel at
the end of the five year period, but Planning Director
Chivetta informed him Sky Power had obtained the first
conditional use permit issued by the City under that
Ordinance and will not be required to remodel under the
five year plan now in effect.
Mr. Maddox stated they want to remodel and improve their
facilities. He noted lack of competent personnel to
lease the station, and stated if given the ten-month delay,
the company would have a chance to see what effect the
opening of Stewart Avenue would have on sales. He further
stated that if Seaside is requested to make improvements
now, no improvements will be made and the facilities will
be either razed or turned over to someone who wilt have the
facilities removed and the property put to a use permitted
in the C-2 Zone.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED DISCUSSION
Councilman Blewett asked how long the facility had been
vacant this time. Mr. Maddox answered it had been
approximately 7 or 8 months when they first applied,
which was in August. Councilman Btewett remarked it had
been closed a long time prior to that also, and
Mr. Maddox replied that it had been dosed off and on.
Mayor McCaron asked whether Seaside had tost their non-
conforming status before they made application. Planning
Director Chivetta answered affirmatively, stating that is
why they applied. The Planning Commission sent Seaside a
letter at the 8-month period, which was a grace of 2 months,
to inform them they must bring the facilities into compliance
with the Code, or raze the station. A third alternative was
appealing to the Planning Commission
Councilman Gregory inquired as to the condition of the
underground tanks after non-use for a long period of time.
Mr. Maddox stated they would a11 be tested for safety and
to be sure they meet Fire Department regulations, as would
a11 the equipment. Councilman Gregory asked how old the
underground tanks are, and Mr. Maddox replied they are the
original tanks which were put in when the station was built.
Councilman Hamilton asked Mr. Maddox what improvements
would be made if Council were to grant permission to
operate the station for the ten months. Mr. Maddox stated
the lot would be cleaned up and the facilities completely
repainted, possibly in a color similar to that of the
Lucky Store, so it would blend in. Councilman Blewett
asked why Seaside had not done this in the past.
Continued)
BIB]
37659-U01
1971-U02
01-U02
20-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9591-U03
FO9838-U03
DO9971-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
2/6/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1971 01 20 CC MIN (Ìì Ù + pe00 oi^S&r
Regular Meeting of the Baldiwn Park City Council
January 20, 1971
Page i
Mr. Maddox stated that the Lucky Store and McDonatd's are
recent additions, which pointed out to Seaside Oil that
they were behind the times". However, because of a
high rate of vandalism in that area, they wanted to have
someone operating the station who would actually be on
the premises before they improved the station. The 8
months went by because of the problem of finding an operator.
Mayor McCaron stated he felt Seaside Oil Company should
be able to make a determination, from past circumstances,
whether or not the station could be successful, without
another ten-months try, and he didn't feel there was
enough basis for the appeal. The station has lost its
non-conforming use, and if it is to continued as a service
station, will have to be remodeled, and he stated he felt
Seaside should be able to make that determination at the
present time. Councilman Hamilton stated that if the
appeal were granted, in ten months they could go through
this again, and he would concur with the Planning
Commission's findings on this matter.
Mr. Maddox commented additionally that if the appeal were
granted, the Company would operate this station for the
next ten months, rather than leasing to individuals.
Councilman King stated that he felt it was in the best
interests of the community to deny the appeal.
COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT THE
FOR SEASIDE OIL COMPANY MO-2)
HAMILTON SECONDED. There were
carried and was so ordered.
MODIFICATION APPLICATION
BE DENIED. COUNCILMAN
no objections. The motion
APPEAL DENIED
SEASIDE OIL CO
MO-2
City Attorney Fiandrick, addressing Mr. Maddox, informed
him that Council's decision meant that Seaside Oil is
required to comply with the conditional use permit or
demolish all buildings and structures forthwith.
00-
It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on
70-N-107, 1402-1402-1/2 Virginia Avenue, and 70-N-108,
1406 Virginia Avenue, to determine whether certain premises
and buildings and structures thereon constitute a public
nuisance. These two items were combined for the purpose of
hearing, because of common ownership. Continued from
January 6, 1971)
Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished.
There were no written protests.
These items were continued from the January 6, 1971 meeting.
City Attorney Flandnck stated that he. City Manager Nordby,
N<yw4te6w(^ City Engineer French, and Planning Director
Chivetta have met with the owners of the properties. The
proposed agreement regarding these two public nuisance cases
is substantially as follows:
Mr. Robert S. Funk is the owner of a11 the properties
concerned. First, the owner of the properties and other
persons having an interest in the properties agree that
in their present condition they constitute a public
nuisance. Second, as to both properties with regard to
a11 buildings and structures located on them, within a
period of 90 days from and after today, the owner wi11
undertake to bring them a11 into conformity with the
City's building regulations. Third, with regard to 1402
and 1402-1/2 Virginia Avenue, notwithstanding the fact
that rather substantial rehabilitation costs will be
Continued)
PUBLIC HEARING
PUBLIC NUISANCE
70-N-107 & 70-N-108
POSTINGS & MAILINGS
NO WRITTEN PROTESTS
RESUME
BIB]
37659-U01
1971-U02
01-U02
20-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9591-U03
FO9838-U03
DO9971-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
2/6/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1971 01 20 CC MIN (Ìì Ù + pe0004^%y f j
Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council January 20, 1971
Page 7
incurred, a11 of the buildings and structures located on
that property wi11 be removed and the property wilt be
cleared, not to exceed five 5) years from the date of
this meeting. With reqard to 1406 Virginia Avenue, that
time would be three 3) years.
Henry Redeker, 11428 Lower Azusa Road, E1 Monte, asked for HENRY REDEKER
clarification of some points. He asked if he understood 11428 LOWER AZUSA RD
correctly that all buildings were to be demolished within EL MONTE
the 90-day period if the owner fails to comply with the
rehabilitation at 1402-1/2 and 1406, and also asked
whether this included 1402 and the ones behind 1402. City
Engineer French stated there were two structures involved,
one at 1402-1/2 and one at 1406. If the structures are
not in compliance with the Building Code, they would have
90 days to either bring them into compliance or demolish
those structures. Within the last year, 1402 Virginia was
brought into compliance with the Building Code. It was a
previous public nuisance action.
City Attorney Flandrick reiterated the requirements so
there would be no misunderstanding. With regard to 1402
and 1402-1/2 Virginia Avenue, within a period of 90 days
the owner is to bring the building marked on the map as
1402-1/2 and the building marked storage shed into
complaince with the building regulations of the City. If
he fails to do so, without further notice the City is
authorized to enter upon the property, demolish those
buildings, and assess the cost back against the property
in the customary fashion in muisance abatement. Five
years after the effective date of this agreement, the
owner will demolish all buildings and structures located
on this property, including 1402 Virginia. The owner,
Mr. Funk, indicated he accepted this agreement.
With regard to 1406 Virginia Avenue, Mr. Redeker inquired
whether the proposed agreement included two occupied
structures at the rear of 1406. City Attorney Flandrick
indicated the proceeding related only to the building
marked 1406 Virginia Avenue, and stated that the same
proposition applies to 1406 as to 1402 and 1402-1/2, i;.e.,
the buildings and structures must be brought into compliance
with the Code within 90 days, or demolished; and in this
case, a11 buildings and structures must be demolished after
three years from the effective date of the agreement.
Mr. Robert S. Funk, 2400 Siwanoy Drive, Athambra, owner of ROBERT S. FUNK
the aforementioned properties, indicated the proposition 2400 SIWANOY DRIVE
was agreeable to him, and stated it would give him time to ALHAMBRA
start an industrial development on the property.
City Attorney Flandrick recommended that the City Attorney
prepare an agreement which wi11 contain a11 details and
matters herein referred to and agreed upon, and submit it
to Mr. Funk for his execution and signatures by Mr. Redeker
and other persons having trust deed interests in the property.
There were no objections.
As there was no one else in the audience desiring to speak PUBLIC HEARING
either in behalf of or in opposition to 70-N-107 or 70-N-108, DECLARED CLOSED
Mayor McCaron declared the public hearings dosed. 70-N-107 & 70-N-108
RESOLUTION NO. 71-26 FINDING AND DETERMINING THE RES. NO. 71-26
EXISTENCE OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING THE ORDER ABATEMENT
SAME ABATED 70-N-107) 70-N-107)
City Attorney Flandn'ck recommended that Resolution No. 71-26 RES. NO. 71-26
70-N-107) be amended in sub-paragraph 1 e) by adding the AMENDED
phrase as amended" after the word report", and in Section 90" DAYS TO ABATE
2, the insertion of the period of 90" days; and the staff
report be amended to provide as indicated earlier, includinq
Continued'
BIB]
37659-U01
1971-U02
01-U02
20-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9591-U03
FO9838-U03
DO9971-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
2/6/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1971 01 20 CC MIN (Ìì Ù + pe0004^2^:
Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council
January 20, 1971
Page 8
the execution of an agreement encompassing all of the terms
referred to regarding reconstruction and demolition as to
the structures.
COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 71-26 BE ADOPTED
AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT
SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried
and was so ordered.
RESOLUTION NO. 71-27 FINDING AND DETERMINING THE
EXISTENCE OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING THE
SAME ABATED 70-N-108)
City Attorney Flandrick recommended that Resolution
No. 71-27 70-N-108) be amended in sub-paragraph 1 e)
by adding the phrase as amended" after the word report",
and in Section 2, the insertion of the period of 90"
days; add the staff report be amended to provide as
indicated earlier, including the execution of an agreement
encompassing all of the terms referred to regarding
reconstruction and demolition as to the structures.
COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 71-27 BE ADOPTED
AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT
SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried
and was so ordered.
00-
It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on
70-S-14, a Short Form 1911 Act, on the West side of Bteecker
Street between Downing Avenue and Nubia Street, for curb
and gutter.
Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished.
There were no written protests.
As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak
either in behalf of or in opposition to 70-S-14, Mayor
McCaron declared the public hearing closed.
It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on
70-S-26, a Short Form 1911 Act, on the East side of Bteecker
Street between Nubia Street and Olive STreet, for curb and
gutter.
Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished.
f
There were no written protests.
As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak
either in behalf of or in opposition to 70-S-26, Mayor
McCaron declared the public hearing closed.
It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on
70-S-27, a Short Form 1911 Act, on the North side of Olive
Street between Elizabeth Street and Bogart Avenue, for
sidewalk and drive approach.
Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished.
There were no written protests.
City Engineer French stated, for the record, that 70-S-27
has been paid off as of the present time.
As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak
either in behalf of or in opposition to 70-S-27, Mayor
McCaron declared the public hearing closed.
Continued)
RES. NO. 71-26
ADOPTED
RES. NO. 71-27
ORDER ABATEMENT
70-N-108)
RES. NO. 71-27
AMENDED
90" DAYS TO ABA^
RES. NO. 71-27
ADOPTED
PUBLIC HEARING
SHORT FORM
70-S-14 C&G)
POSTINGS & MAILINGS
NO WRITTEN PROTESTS
PUBLIC HEARING
DECLARED CLOSED
70-S-14
PUBLIC HEARING
SHORT FORM
70-S-26 C&G)
POSTINGS & MAILINGS
NO WRITTEN PROTESTS
PUBLIC HEARING
DECLARED CLOSED
70-S-26
PUBLIC HEARING
SHORT FORM
70-S-27 S&DA)
POSTINGS & MAILINGS
NO WRITTEN PROTESTS
PUBLIC HEARING
DECLARED CLOSED
70-S-27
BIB]
37659-U01
1971-U02
01-U02
20-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9591-U03
FO9838-U03
DO9971-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
2/6/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1971 01 20 CC MIN (Ìì Ù +
pe0004729^°^"^
Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council
It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on
70-S-29, a Short Form 1911 Act, on the Southwest side of
Grace Avenue between Ramona Boulevard and Athot Street for
curb and gutter.
Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished.
There were no written protests.
As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak
either in behalf of or in opposition to 70-S-29, Mayor
McCaron declared the public hearing dosed.
It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on
70-S-30, a Short Form 1911 Act, on the South side of Palm
Avenue between Benham Avenue and La Rica Avenue for
sidewalk and drive appraoch.
Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished.
There were no written protests.
As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak
either in behalf of or in opposition to 70-S-30, Mayor
McCaron declared the public hearing dosed.
RESOLUTION NO. 71-22 CONFIRMING CERTAIN REPORTS
OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS 70-S-14, 26,
27, 29 & 30)
City Engineer French stated that in Section 1 f) the
word no" should be inserted.
COUNCILMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 71-22 BE
ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN
HAMILTON SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion
carried and was so ordered.
00-
City Engineer French requested that Case No. 70-A-62 be
dismissed. There were no objections.
00-
It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on
70-A-63, to determine whether certain vehicles constitute
a public nuisance at 4228 Center Street.
Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished.
There were no written protests.
City Engineer French presented photographs taken November 17,
1970, of the vehicles involved. The property was checked
this date and a red X" on certain photographs indicated
vehicles which had been removed.
TESTIMONY WAS GIVEN BY:
Mr. George Craven, 4228 Center Street, stated that most of
the vehicles had been removed, and that the M.G. and truck
remaining would be removed the next day. He stated 60 days
would be more than sufficient to allow him to work on the
vehicles and have them removed.
As there was no one else in the audience desiring to speak
either in behalf of or in opposition to 70-A-63, Mayor
McCaron declared the public ehanng dosed.
Continued)
January 20, 1971
Page 9
PUBLIC HEARING
SHORT FORM
70-S-29
POSTINGS & MAILINGS
NO WRITTEN PROTESTS
PUBLIC HEARING
DECLARED CLOSED
70-S-29
PUBLIC HEARING
SHORT FORM
70-S-30
POSTINGS & MAILINGS
NO WRITTEN PROTESTS
PUBLIC HEARING
DECLARED CLOSED
70-S-30
RES. NO. 71-22
CONFIRMING COSTS
70-S-14. 26, 27,
29 & 30)
SECTION 1 f)
WORD NO" INSERTED
RES. NO. 71-22
ADOPTED
70-A-62
DISMISSED
PUBLIC HEARING
PUBLIC NUISANCE
70-A-63
POSTINGS & MAILINGS
NO WRITTEN PROTESTS
RESUME PHOTOS
TESTIMONY
GEORGE CRAVEN
4228 CENTER STREET
PUBLIC HEARING
DECLARED CLOSED
70-A-63
BIB]
37659-U01
1971-U02
01-U02
20-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9591-U03
FO9838-U03
DO9971-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
2/6/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1971 01 20 CC MIN (Ìì Ù + pe
00047^6^
Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council
RESOLUTION NO. 71-28 FINDING AND DETERMINING THE
EXISTENCE OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING THE
SAME ABATED 70-A-63)
City Engineer French stated that in Section 2, a time
limit of 60" days should be inserted.
City Attorney Flandrick stated Section 2 should be amended
to delete items 6, 7, 8, 10 and 14, as these vehicles have
already been removed.
COUNCILMAN HAMILTON MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 71-28 BE
ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN
KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion
carried and was so ordered.
00-
It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on
Z-330, proposed reclassification from C-2 A) heavy
commercial), one acre or more to develop, to C-2 heavy
commercial), or a more restrictive zone on certain real
property located on Baldwin Park Boulevard, Francisquito,
Maine, the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way, Garvey
Avenue and 600 * easterly of Robinette.
Proper publications and postings and mailings had been
accomplished.
Planning Director Chivetta stated that on December 10, 1970
the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC70-48,
recommending to the Council that the aforementioned property
be reclassified from C-2 A) to C-2, and from C-2 A) to R-1.
There are 67 properties under consideration; 41 of those
properties are occupied by single-family structures; 9 lots
are used for R-2 development; 6 lots are occupied with
commercial development; the remaining 11 lots are vacant.
The intent and purpose of C-2 zoning was to encourage
development on a large-scale basis; however, that tenet did
not come to fruition. The C-2 zoning has been an ineffective
classification applied to the property, which is acting as a
deterrent to the development, rather than an encouragement.
Planning Director Chivetta posted on the wait a land use map
which showed the percentage breakdown, and explained the
various colors and markings used on the map.
Planning Director Chivetta further pointed out that very
few properties in this area contain one acre, except for
those properties located on Francisquito and on Tracy
Street. These properties could be developed commercially;
however, most of the properties could not. Planning
Director Chivetta stated that one of the problems has
been that when a developer wishes to purchase property,
he can possibly buy one lot, which may be half an acre,
then the owner of the adjacent lot may feel his property
is worth more because the purchaser needs it to conform
to the one-acre provision.
The Planning Commission considered the entire area, some
20 acres, with the possibility of rolling back the zone,
so as to put it back on the market, so developers could
purchase the property at a fair market value, and then
develop in accordance with the City's goats.
The Planning Commission's Resolution recommends to the
Council that those properties presently used as C-2 be
reclassified from C-2 A) to C--2 zoning, and that the
remaining properties be reclassified back to R-1, which
was the original zoning when the City was incorporated.
Prior to that time, they were classified Z-1 for
agricultural usage.
Continued)
January 20, 1971
Page 10
RES. NO. 71-23
ORDER ABATEMENT
70-A-63)
SECITON 2
60" DAYS TO ABATE
RES. NO. 71-28
ADOPTED
PUBLIC HEARING
Z-330 PROPOSED
RECLASSIFICATION
PUBLICATION. POSTINGS
& MAILINGS
RESUME
BIB]
37659-U01
1971-U02
01-U02
20-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9591-U03
FO9838-U03
DO9971-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
2/6/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1971 01 20 CC MIN (Ìì Ù +
1971 01 20 CC MIN (Ìì Ù +
pe000-?^3^
Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council
January 20, 1971
Page 12
concept in the community by taking alt the residential,
commercial, and manufacturing zones and rolling them into
one letter, either R", C", or M", and doing away with
the R-1, R-2, R-3, C-1, C-2, CM etc. concept. There are
a lot of problems that would have to be worked out, but
this would also relieve a lot of problems the City is
faced with, especially along the San Bernardino Freeway.
TESTIMONY IN OPPOSITION TO Z-330 WAS GIVEN BY:
Jay Angelo, Realtor, 3123 Baldwin Park Boulevard stated
he was representing property owners along Baldwin Park
Boulevard. He felt some of the owners misunderstood the
notice posted on the street. He then read and presented
a petition signed by 14 property owners against Z-330,
with respect to Area 1 and 2, which stated, The undersigned
wish to emphatically object to both the intent of the subject
zoning changes, and the method of advertising said case. The
attached Notice of Zone Change implies that the existing C-2
A) Zone has been reclassified to C-2. We have learned that
it is the intent to rezone the subject property, with the
exception of several lots now utilized for commercial purpose,
to R-1 zone. If this is the intent of the Notice of Zone
Change, it should so state and not mislead the property owner.
Rezoning the properties to R-1 would detrimentally affect the
property values of the properties specified in Area 1 and 2
of the subject zoning case, which is ideally suited for
commercial purposes, and not desirable for residential
development. We understand the City of Baldwin Park is
contemplating precise development plan approval concept, and
recommend taht the existing zoning remain C-2 A) until the
precise plan approval procedure is adopted, and when a
precise plan is adopted, they desire that the property be
rezoned to C-1 or C-2."
Maggie McDevitt, 3025 N. Maine, stated she did not want
this change, because of difficulty she was already having
with her property. There is a C-1 zone abutting part of
her property, and she doesn't want a C-1 zone on one side.
If it's going to be changed, she wants it a11 changed to
one zone, or remain as it is. She stated there was a lot
split at the corner of Maine and Garvey, and part of her
lot is a residential lot, and the other part is on C-1
zone. She stated this causes a problem and she is unable
to do anything with her lot, and if there is to be any zone
changing, she wants the whole area zoned, not only partially
zoned.
She stated she had owned the property for 34 years. Mayor
McCaron asked whether she had made application to the City
for any particular use of her property. She stated that
she had tried to make a living from her property, and that
she had been turned down on everything she had applied for
with the City; she has a11 different zones around her
property, but she can't do anything with her property.
TESTIMONY IN
OPPOSITION TO Z-330
JAY ANGELO, REALTOR
3123 BALDWIN PARK BLVD.
MAGGIE MC DEVITT
3025 N. MAINE
Arthur Betts, 3138 Baldwin Park Boulevard, stated his
property is on the east side of Baldwin Park Boulevard
about a half block south of Francisquito. He stated he
felt rezom'ng this property to R-1 would be like turning
the clock back 20 years". He thinks the zoning as it is
at present would give the area a chance to develop commercially.
He fe1t the area should be commercial, or apartments, but
certainty not R-1.
ARTHUR BETTS
3138 BALDWIN PARK BLVD.
Mr. Bernard Peri in, 3670 Wit shire, Los Angeles, stated they
are the owners of property at the northwesterly corner of
Tracy and Baldwin Park Boulevard, which is currently used
partially as commercial. He stated that they purchased
the property under C-2 A) zoning, and it was mandatory
Continued)
BERNARD PERLIN
3670 WILSHIRE
LOS ANGELES
BIB]
37659-U01
1971-U02
01-U02
20-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9591-U03
FO9838-U03
DO9971-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
2/6/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1971 01 20 CC MIN (Ìì Ù + peooo^y''
Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council January 20, 1971
Page 13
that they purchase an acre, which they did at substantial
expense—in excess of $100,000.00. He stated they own
lots 9 and 10, and have master-planned the corner for a
convenience market and shops. He asked Planning Director
Chivetta what the proposed zoning for this corner is.
Planning Director Chivetta answered that it was the Planning
Commission's intention to recommend to the Council
red assifi cation from C-2 A) to C-2 just those properties
that are occupied with commercial establishments; that
would be the Union 76 Station, and the Orange Julius. The
single-family homes which occupy this one acre would be
redassified to R-1. Mr. Perlin stated that they were
required specifically to tie those properties together so
they could never sell them separately, to insure the City
there would be a one-acre parcel for development under the
City's ordinance. He further stated it woulc be an extreme
hardship now to have half of the property zoned R-1.
Planning Director Chivetta commented that the mixed use of
the land violated the Municipal Code. Mr. Perlin explained
they had gone through the process of obtaining a variance
in order to accomplish this. Mr. Perlin indicated it was
their intent to develop the property commercially.
Mayor McCaron then presented clarification of some of the
points previously discussed. C-2 A) never developed because
anyone coming in to purchase one acre had to buy two established
lots in order to do so. It's been several years that this has
been C-2 A), and nothing has been accomplished in that direction.
At the present time. there is no control, even with C-2 A), over
what portions of the entire area commercial development could go
in. Anybody could buy two lots that would meet the requirements
of an acre on Maine Street, among the houses, and put in a
C-2 A) development, and this would immediately place the
properties on either side of it in jeopardy as far as continuing
their use as residential. The intent here is not to try to
develop the entire area as commercial, but to take another
method of doing it and having a tittle more control on the type
of development that goes in to the area, and then control it so
it doesn't deterioriate the area by having mixed uses on the
lots that exist. This is why it has been suggested to rezone to
R-1, and have the development progress property.
Mr. Pert in continued by commenting that should the property
be rezoned R-1, there is nothing to preclude someone coming
in and building a new house, which would be unfair to that
party, if the real intent is to have the area be a commercial
development. Mayor McCaron stated the potential of that
happening is not there at this time.
Mr. Perlin stated he was happy to hear the precise plan was
being considered, rather than the spot zone. He further
stated that after five years at C-2 A), and when a precise
plan is, perhaps, a couple of months away, to change it back
to R-1 is not fair to the property owners. It will devaluate
the property, and he doesn't feet it will accomplish the idea
of the precise plan. He suggested adopting the precise plan,
and using that as control.
Jack Wattel, 3120 Baldwin Park Boulevard, stated he has a JACK WATTEL
little better than a third of an acre in the area that he 3120 BALDWIN PARK BLVD
has been developing and working on for ten years. If it
were rezoned to R-1, he woutd't be able to do a thing with
his lot, not even use it for agriculture. He stated the
lots are too large to be used for one residence and nothing
else. He feels rezoning to R-1 would work a hardship on a
lot of people, and although the zoning as it is may not be
appropriate, he felt a happy medium could be reached without
going a11 the way back to R-1. He definitely opposed the
R-1 zoning.
Continued)
BIB]
37659-U01
1971-U02
01-U02
20-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9591-U03
FO9838-U03
DO9971-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
2/6/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1971 01 20 CC MIN (Ìì Ù + peoeo-ns^
Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council
Frank Bernato, 3149 Baldwin Park Boulevard, stated he was
opposed to the R-1 zoning, and felt if the zoning was to
be changed it should be changed to C-2.
Don Barnes, 13526 Francisquito, stated he owns just over
an acre on the corner. He has talked to other owners of
about five tots down on Francisquito, and non of them want
the R-1 zoning; they want nothing less than C-2, and he
stated this was his feeling also.
Mrs. Ralph Farmer, 3090 N. Maine, stated she has property
at the corner of francisquito and Maine, which she has had
since 1946. About six years ago, a taco house was built
next to her property, and she stated she could not possibly
sell her property if it were rezoned to R-1. She also
stated she has paid taxes for the past 7 years as C-2 A),
and it wouldn't be fair to put it back to R-1, because she
has boulevard frontage, and couldn't sell it as R-1. She
stated she is definitely opposed to R-1.
Harold Andrews, 3084 Maine, stated that when you look
over that area, who would want R-1 there?
FURTHER DISCUSSION FOLLOWED:
Mayor McCaron asked Planning Director Chivetta whether
there is any other procedure that could be used to
control proper development on this property in a
procedural manner. Planning Director Chivetta replied
that the Commission was considering the precise plan zoning;
however, precise plan zoning would only be to consider a
precise plan of development on property that is appropriately
zoned for that particular use for which they are applying;
it would control the esthetics—building design. C-2 would
result in the reverse of what we are trying to do; it would
encourage small developments, such as the service station
and the Orange Julius and the tittle taco stand. The
Planning Commission feels no one would desire to construct
a single-family dwelling in that particular area because of
the commercial development potential.
Planning Director Chivetta stated there is no set procedure
by which we could encourage large development other than
rolling it back and then having someone come in and purchase
the property, other than going through a community
redevelopment agency where the City would then go in and
condemn all the property, using private capital or some
other means of acquiring the property, and then offer it
for sale to a developer as large acreage itself. There is
no zoning technique we can use that would encourage
development on a large-scale basis.
Councilman Hamilton suggested that since this is the first
time the matter has come up before Council, and since so
many of the property owners oppose the rezoning, the
matter be held over for further study. Mayor McCaron
stated he felt more study was warranted, in view of the
testimony presented.
Mr. Angelo stated he felt more consideration should be
given to the matter. He commented that the tight money"
situation which had been with us for the past three years
was relaxing, and money is now available for commercial
development. He stated the economy is changing, and he
feels Council should give this more consideration before
changing the zoninq to R-1.
January 20, 1971
Page 14
FRANK BERNATO
3149 BALDWIN PARK BLVD.
DON BARNES
13526 FRANCISQUITO
MRS. RALPH FARMER
3090 N. MAINE
HAROLD ANDREWS
3084 MAINE
FURTHER DISCUSSION
Continued)
BIB]
37659-U01
1971-U02
01-U02
20-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9591-U03
FO9838-U03
DO9971-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
2/6/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1971 01 20 CC MIN (Ìì Ù + peoe^ms
Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council January 20, 1971
Page 15
Councilman King stated that in view of the proposed
precise, plan, and in view of the testimony given by so
many of the property owners in opposition to the rezoning,
he did not see the necessity of holding the matter over.
He felt, as Mr. Angelo said, that since the tight money"
situation is relaxing, the situation could be left as it
is for a while, and the precise plan would control
development in the area.
Mayor McCaron asked Planning Director Chivetta whether the
precise plan would prevent helter-skelter development in
the area. Planning Director Chivetta stated no. The precise
plan would be the review of developments only if they were
permitted in that particular zone, on a lot-to-lot basis or
acreage basis. The Mayor stated there should be some method
of handling this whereby development could be controlled so
as to be orderly.
Councilman Btewett stated that since being elected to Council,
he had spent much time trying to interest developers in
coming into the City. One of the key problems the developers
face is that they feel we have property that is improperly
zoned. The owner gets the idea the value is automatically up
when the property is C-2 A) or M-1, which is not true. The
value of the property is only in the use of the property. He
stated he feels the homeowner would probably do much better
if the property were zoned R-1, because it would interest
more developers.
Councilman King asked City Manager Nordby if the item regarding
establishment of a Cormunity Redevelopment Agency on the agenda
would help in this matter. City Manager Nordby replied that
this might overcome sone of the problems and considerations
presented. He said this would eliminate anyone standing in
the way of a major development, which is how Councilman
Btewett feels this area should be utilized. Councilman
Btewett feels this problem exists all over the city, and
should be solved in one place, and then move on throughout
the city to try to correct it.
Councilman King stated there had been so much testimony
by the property owners the City has a good ordinance in
the areas mentioned before. City Manager Nordby"s
recommendation regarding the community redevelopment
agency is a fine recommendation, in that the Council can
help deter the over-pricing of an area and make sure that
a fair and equitable price is given for each piece of
property, which wilt help the developer rather than deter
development, and he felt holding the hearing over would
possibly cause more problems than to leave it as is and
let the solution find itself.
Councilman Blewett commented that alt were in agreement
that the area should be C-2 and should be developed
commercially, and that Council was interested in the
speediest way that property can be developed and the
owners realize the most money from their property, while
having the area developed to its fullest. He stated there
had been several years of strong economic conditions in
the country, and no development had taken place in the
area.
Councilman Gregory stated she felt the property should
remain C-2 A) until the request for change came from the
people, as it was apparent from testimony given they do
not want a zone change at this time. She stated she felt
the public hearing could be closed, and wait for further
development.
Continued)
BIB]
37659-U01
1971-U02
01-U02
20-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9591-U03
FO9838-U03
DO9971-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
2/6/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1971 01 20 CC MIN (Ìì Ù + peooA-a^e,
Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council
January 2C', 1971
Page 16
Councilman King suggested thr: interested property owners
remain at the meeting to hear City Manager Nordby's
presentation regarding the community redevelopment agency.
COUNCILMAN HAMILTON MOVED THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON 330
BE CONTINUED UNTIL FEBRUARY 17, 1971. COUNCILMAN BLEtiETT
SECONDED. Roll Call. There were no objections. The
motion carried and was so ordered.
PUBLIC HEARING
Z-330 CONTINUED
TO 2/17/71
00-
City Engineer French requested that the hearing on the
Walnut Street Assessment District be held over to
February 3, 1971. He stated the property owners and all
residents of the street had been notified of the holdover.
Mayor McCaron stated he would open the hearing, and then
it could be continued. City Attorney Flandrick recommended
the Mayor not take any testimory this evening, because there
had been a problem in conjunction with the recordation of
the map, and they were not prepared to make the presentation
of the nature of the district. One gentlemen who wished to
present testimony was requested to return February 3, 1971,
and agreed to do so.
Mayor McCaron stated the public hearing on the Walnut Street
Assessment District would be continued to February 3, 1971.
There were no objections, and it was so ordered.-
00-
City Clerk Balkus recommended that a Temporary Use Permit
be granted to the Chamber of Conmierce for' carnival to be
held January 21, 22, 23 and 24, 1971, and a sidewalk sate
on the same dates, and a parade on January 23 beginning
at 10:00 a.m.
COUNCILMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT THE TEMPORARY USE PERMIT
FOR CARNIVAL, SIDEWALK SALE, AND PARADE BE GRANTED TO
THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCED, AND THAT FEES BE WAIVED.
COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED:
Councilman Gregory noted that the Chamber of'Commerce was
tate in filing this permit, and had been remiss in this
area several times in the past. The carnival was already
in the process of being set up. She felt a letter should
be forwarded to the Chamber indicating the necessity for
their compliance with the timely filing of applications
for permits. Councilman Blewett concurred with Councilman
Gregory, and stated the Chamber of Commerce should be the
leaders of the community and should set the standards for
the community by following proper procedure.
There were no objections to the motion. The motion
carried and was so ordered.
00-
City Manager Nordby resented information regarding
dissolution of TASC Transportation Association of
Southern California) and its absorption as a sub-committee
of SCAG Southern California Association of Governments).
This merger has been studied for about two years by the
two agencies.
Contirued
PUBLIC HEARING
WALNUT ST. A/D
HELD OVER TO 2/3/71
T.U.P. C OF C
FOR CARNIVAL,
SIDEWALK SALE &
PARADE
DISCUSSION
T.U.P. APPROVED
MERGER OF TASC & SCAG
BIB]
37659-U01
1971-U02
01-U02
20-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9591-U03
FO9838-U03
DO9971-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
2/6/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1971 01 20 CC MIN (Ìì Ù + pe00^3^
Regular Meeting of the Baldwin ParK City Council
January 20, 1971
Page 17
City Clerk Balkus read by title:
RESOLUTION NO. 71-29 CONSENTING TO THE DISSOLUTION
OF THE TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA
COUNCILMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NC. 71-29 BE
ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN
HAMILTON SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion
carried and was so ordered.
00-
City Manager Nordby presented information regarding the
proposed increase in rates by Southern California Edison.
He stated the City would be affected in the amount of
approximately $15,000.00 a year for street lighting alone,
as well as the affect on private citizens and businesses.
City Clerk Balkus read by title:
RESOLUTION NO. 71-30 EXPRESSING CONCERN REGARDING
THE REQUEST FOR RATE INCREASES BY THE SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY TO THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC
UTILITIES COMMISSION
t
COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 71-30 BE AHOPTED
AND THAT FURTHER REAPING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT
SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion earned
and was so ordered.
00-
At City Manager Nordby's request. City Clerk Balkus read
by title:
RESOLUTION NO. 71-31 PROTESTING HIGH COUNTY TAX
RATE AND URGING THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY DIVISION OF
THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES TO PERSUADE STATE
LEGISLATURE TO PROVIDE FUNDS FOR STATE MANDATED
PROGRAMS
COUNCILMAN HAMILTON MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 71-31 BE
ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN
GREGORY SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion
carried and was so ordered.
00-
City Manager Nordby presented a request for an award of
the Central Park West Contract. He stated there had been
competitive bidding, with bids ranging from $95,000 plus
to $120,000. In reviewing the bids, it was
the tow bidder had a Landscape Contractor's
identified as C-27, and not the A" license
the state. The second low bidder had filed a protest on
this basis, but has now agreed not to pursue the protest.
The tow bidder. Landscape Services, Inc., of Monrovia, has
applied for a license, and a tetter has been received from
the Contractors' State Licensing Board indicatirg there is
no foreseeable reason to deny the license- The City
Manager recommended that the contract be awarded to th^
tow bidder in the sum of $95,217.57.
discovered
License,
as requi red by
RES, NO. 71-29
DISSOLUTION OF
TASC
RES. NO. 71-29
ADOPTED
CITY PROTESTING INC
IN SO. CAL. EDISON
RATES
RES. NO. 71-30
EXPRESS CONCERN RE
RATE INCREASE BY SO
CAL. EDISON
RES. NO. 71-30
ADOP'fFD
RES. NO. 71-31
PROTESTING HIGH CO.
TAX RATE & URGING
STATE PROVIDE FUNDS:
STATE MANDATED PROGRAM"
RES. NO. 71-31
ADOPTED
CENTRAL PARK WEST
CONTRACT
City Attorney Ftandrick amplified the City Manager's comments
by stating the matter had been discussed with the bidder
filing the protest, as we11 as with the tow bidder. The
low bidder had been informed that it would be recommended to
Continuer1)
BIB]
37659-U01
1971-U02
01-U02
20-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9591-U03
FO9838-U03
DO9971-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
2/6/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1971 01 20 CC MIN (Ìì Ù + pe000^738
T^O
Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park Cit^ Council
January 0, HVt
Paap 18
the Council that the contract be awarded tn him, upon condition
that should there bo anv litination concerninn the license
states of bin and/or his conpanv with renard to this protect,
the cost will bo born? solely by him; and if that litigation
results in an issuance of a restraim'nn order, which is
conceivable althouoh practically speakinn not somethinn we
can expect, that such order will not be considered as anv
delay in the project should it occur after comencenent of work.
City Manaqer Nordby asked whether Mr. Flandrick were
recommendina a conditional approval, and Mr. Handrick answered
that he was.
TESTIMONY 1;AS GIVLri BY:
TESTIMONY
JAY MYNE
LANDSCAPE SERVICED
1963 S. Mvrtio Avenue'
MONROVIA
Mr. Jay Uyne. Landscape Services, 1963 S. Mvrttc Avenue,
Monrovia, was present in the audience. He indicated he
understood and concurred with the statements made by the
City Attorney, and acknowledned the responsibilities
therewith.
City Attorney Ftandrick further clarified the City's
position as far as awardinn the contract to Landscape
Services, Inc. Any defects insofar as licensinn will be
at Mr, Wyne's sole expense and his problem, and should there
be litiqation filed to prevent the execution of tne contract
or to prevent commencement of the work, Mr. lyne wi11 undertake
to defend that proceedino and it will be at his expense, even
thounh the City may be made a party to it. If the City should
be made a party to any titination we will anpear and, of course,
advise the Council and the nentleman fron Landscape Services,
Inc.; however, any costs and fees and anv other expense incurred
by the City will be at Mr. Jay Wyne's sole expense.
Mr. Flandrick further stated that the City Enninecr will advise
Landscape Services, Inc. of the award of the contract, and copies
of the letter indicatinn the award and the date of the
commencement of work will no to all other bidders, so if
there is to be any contest of the award, it would have to
be within the 15 days prior to commencement of work.
Mr. Wyne stated that the oblioation was basically his, so he
had followed throuoh on this particular avenue with both the
local office in El Monte and tlie State office in Sacramento
of the Licensinn Coard, and both assured bin that the startino
time and completion date of this particular project would have cone
and oone lono before any litination could be started, i'e
further stated that both offices assured bin they sai.' no reason
why there would be a probler.
COUNCILMAN HAMILTON MOVED THAT THE CONTRACT FOR LANDSCAPING CONTRACT AUARUEh TO
CENTRAL PARK JEST BE AWARDED TO LANDSCAPE SERVICES. INC. FOR LANDSCAPE LI'VILr^.
THE AMOUNT SPECIFIED. $95.217.57. UPON THE CONDITIONS STATED BY INC.
THE CITY ATTORNEY. AND THAT THE rV\YOP AND THE CITY CLERK BF
AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT. COUNCILMAN GREGORY
SECONDED. Roil ca11. There wore no objections. The notion
carried and was so ordered.
no-
Citv Manaoer Nordbv presented information on pstabi ishii'n n COMMUNITY
Community Kcdevclopnent Anencv. HP stato^ he felt this v-^ REDEVELOPMENT
a toot by which the City could force anc^ control first-cliss AGENCY
dcvelopnent, and wMch would ovprcopp sono of the prnblers
which were presentee1 earlier bv property owners reoardin^
zom'no.
City Clerk Balkus redo hv tine:
ORDINANCE NO. 584 AMENPINO THE R/'Lt^ir' r/\PI'
MUNICIPAL CODL BY ADLiI:;r, srCTIOfi P^; Tt!EPET('
RELATING. T( C()M:'U;JITY PFPt VELr.1?:1! T /'Ft i';CV
continueo)
ORD. NC.
APD SfCTIOfi P'iZi
BIB]
37659-U01
1971-U02
01-U02
20-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9591-U03
FO9838-U03
DO9971-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
2/6/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1971 01 20 CC MIN (Ìì Ù + pe0004739
Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council
January 20, 1971
Page 19
COUNCILMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT FURTHER READING OF ORDINANCE
NO. 584 BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were
no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered.
COUNCILMAN GRE80RY MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 584 B?
INTRODUCED. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no
objections. The motion carried and was so ordered.
00-
City Manager Nordby made mention of several meetings which
were scheduled in the near future, at which the Council
should be represented, and stated notices would be on the
Conference Room desk.
00-
RESOLUTION NO. 71-32 SETTING A HEARING DATE FOR
ANY PROTESTS OR OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORTS OF THE
CITY MANAGER ON WORK COMPLETED UNDER SECTION 3200
ET SEQ., OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF
BALDWIN PARK 70-N-36)
COUNCILMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 71-32 BE
ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN
HAMILTON SECONDED. There were no objections. The
motion carried and was so ordered.
00-
RESOLUTION NO. 71-33 SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR
A HEARING TO DETERMINE WHETHER CERTAIN VEHICLES
CONSTITUTE A PUBLIC NUISANCE
COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 71-33 BE
ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN
GREGORY SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion
carried and was so ordered.
00-
City Engineer French presented a request for authorization
for the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute an agreement
between the City and Municipal Engineering Consultants, Inc.,
of West Covina, to perform engineering work for the City in
conjunction with the Los Angeles County Flood Control
District's 1970 program. Project No. 1750, Merced and Olive;
Project No. 9705, Athol Street. This agreement has been
approved by the City Attorney and the City Engineer. The fee
would be as established by the Los Angeles County Flood Control,
and they would be paid by Los Angeles County Flood Control
through the City of Baldwin Park.
COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT THE MAYOR AND THE CITY CLERK BE
AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE A STORM DRAIN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
CITY AND MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. COUNCILMAN
HAMILTON SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion
carried and was so ordered.
00-
Planning Director Chivetta presented a resume relative
to Parcel Map No. 781, the creation of seven parcels of
land in accordance with Article 3 Section 11535, sub-
section d)» Business and Professional Code of the State
of California. The property is located at 4723 Stewart
Avenue. The Planning Commission approved the division of
land on December 23, 1970 Res. PC 70-52), Richard Scott,
applicant.
continued)
FURTHER READING
ORD. NO. 584
WAIVED
ORD. NO. 584
INTRODUCED
ORGANIZATION
MEETINGS
RES. NO. 71-32
SETTING HEARING t)ATE
FOR WORK COMPLETED
UNDER SEC. 3200
70-N-36)
RES. NO. 71-32
ADOPTED
RES. NO. 71-33
DETERMINE PUBLIC
NUISANCE 71-A-5 & 6)
RES. NO. 71-33
ADOPTED
STORM DRAIN
AGREEMENT
L. A. CO. FLOOD
CONTROL DISTRICT)
MOTION TO EXECUTE
STORM DRAIN AGRMT.
BET. CITY AND MUN.
ENGR. CONSULTANTS,
INC.
PARCEL MAP NO. 781
TO CREATE 7 PARCELS
OF LAND AT 4723
STEWART AVENUE
R. SCOH)
BIB]
37659-U01
1971-U02
01-U02
20-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9591-U03
FO9838-U03
DO9971-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
2/6/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1971 01 20 CC MIN (Ìì Ù + pe00^
Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council
COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT PARCEL MAP NO. 781 BE APPROVED,
SUBJECT TO PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS. COUNCILMAN
BLEWETT SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion
carried and was so ordered.
00-
City Clerk Balkus read by title:
January 20, 1971
Page 20
PARCEL MAP NO. 781
APPROVED SUBJECT TO
P. C. RECOMMENDATIONS
RESOLUTION NO. 71-34 GRANTING A ZONE VARIANCE
APPLICATION APPLICANT: KELLY; CASE NO. ZV-^32;
LOCATION: 14616 BALDWIN AVENUE)
COUNCILMAN HAMILTON MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 71-34 BE
ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN
KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion
carried and was so ordered.
00-
Mayor McCaron called for any nominations for the repre-
sentative to the Santa Fe Dam Regional Park Authority.
Darcy Skaggs had been previously nominated. Councilman
Blewett stated he would like to nominate Mr. George W.
Bayliss. 3468 Big Dalton, 962-2908, who is an educator
at Baldwin Park High School, a coach, and a former
Scoutmaster.
There was discussion regarding the merits of both
nominees, and it was agreed both were well qualified.
Mayor McCaron stated he would like to have all nominations
and then elect a representative at the next meeting.
There were no objections.
00-
City Clerk Balkus read by title:
RES. NO. 71-34
ZONE VARIANCE 232
KELLY-14616 BALDWIN
RES. NO. 71-34
ADOPTED
REP. TO SANTA FE DAM
REG. PARK AUTHORITY
GEORGE W. BAYLISS
NOMINATED
ORDINANCE NO. 585, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING THE ZONING MAP
OF SAID CITY AND REZONING CERTAIN HEREIN DESCRIBED
REAL PROPERTY FROM ZONE R-l TO ZONE M-l ZONE CASE
NO. Z-328, PART I)
COUNCILMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT FURTHER READING OF ORDINANCE
NO. 585 BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were
no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered.
COUNCILMAN' GREGORY MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 585 BE
INTRODUCED. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no
objections. The motion carried and was so ordered.
00-
City Clerk Balkus read by title:
ORD. NO. 585
AMENDING
ZONING MAP
Z-328. PART I
FURTHER READING
ORD. NO. 585
WAIVED
ORD. NO. 585
INTRODUCED
ORDINANCE NO. 586, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING THE ZONING MAP
OF SAID CITY AND REZONING CERTAIN HEREIN DESCRIBED
REAL PROPERTY FROM ZONE R-l TO ZONE M-l ZONE CASE
NO. Z-328. PART II)
COUNCILMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT FURTHER READING OF ORDINANCE
NO 586 BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were
no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered.
continued)
ORD. NO. 586
AWNDING
ZONING MAP
Z-328. PART II
FURTHER READING
ORD. NO. 586
WAIVED
BIB]
37659-U01
1971-U02
01-U02
20-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9591-U03
FO9838-U03
DO9971-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
2/6/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1971 01 20 CC MIN (Ìì Ù + pef;^\:
0004741
Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council
January 20, 1971
Page 21
COUNCILMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 586 BE
INTRODUCED SECOND READING TO BE HELD WHEN PHASE B"
IS READY FOR DEVELOPWNT). COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED.
There were no objections. The motion carried and was
so ordered.
00-
Councilman Gregory stated she would be unable to attend
the February 3 Council meeting as she would be attending
a National Health Institute panel discussion, and would
be speaking on the subject of local health and money
problems.
00-
AT 10:00 P.M.. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT MOVED THAT COUNCIL
ADJOURN INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS A LEGAL MATTER,
COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections.
The motion carried and was so ordered.
As the City Attorney stated that an executive session was
n<>t necessary in this instance, to instruct the City
Attorney regarding non-conforming trailer parks, the
Council reconvened in regular sessi'on at 10:01 p.m. Roll
call; same as at 7:30 p.m.
00-
City Attorney Flandrick explained that compliance with the
Municipal Code included signing the conditional use permits
acknowledging the existence of the non-conforming trailer
parks and accepting the conditions. He was referring to
Mrs. E. Igna's trailer parks. She had failed to do so on
her property. She now has a new attorney, Mr. Darrel Moore,
of West Covina. Mr. Moore had contacted Mr. Flandrick and
Mr. Nordby several times during the latter part of 1970
indicating he would like to have an opportunity to review
the voluminous files in Planning and Engineering and the
Legal files. He understood that this has now been completed,
and at last contact with Mr. Moore in mid-December 1970,
Mr. Moore requested a letter from Mr. Nordby sumnarizing
what had occurred to date, and he indicated he would contact
the City again within two weeks; however, there has been no
word from him since. A letter from Mr. Nordby was mailed to
Mr. Moore on December 17, 1970.
COUNCILMAN BLEWETT MOVED THAT THE CITY ATTORNEY BE INSTRUCTED
TO CONTACT THE ATTORNEY FOR MRS. IGNA AND MRS. IGNA. AND
ADVISE THEM THAT THEY WILL NOW HAVE A PERIOD OF TEN 10) DAYS
FROM AFTER THE DATE OF THE LETTER. WITHIN WHICH ERIOD OF TIME
THEY WILL EITHER COME IN AND SIGN THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS.
ACKNOWLEDGING THEIR EXISTENCE AND THAT THEY ACCEPT THE
CONDITIONS. AND THEREAFTER. FORTHWITH. COMPLY WITH ALL CONDITIONS
OF APPROVAL. THE ALTERNATIVE IS. IF THEY FAIL TO DO IT WITHIN
THAT TIME. WE WILL COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS TO REVOKE ALL THREE OF
THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS AND. THEREAFTER. TAKE SUCH ACTION
AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO ENFORCE THE ZONING ORDINANCE. INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO CRIMINAL PROSECUTION. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON
SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and
was so ordered.
00-
ORD. NO. 586
INTRODUCED
SEC. RDG. TO BE
HELD WHEN PHASE B"
READY FOR DEVELOPMENT)
COUNCILMAN GREGORY
TO BE ABSENT FROM
NEXT MEETING
ADJOURN TO EXEC.
SESSION 10:00 P.M.
RECONVENE REGULAR
SESSION 10:01 P.M.
NON-CONFORMING
TRAILER PARKS
E. IGNA
MOTION FOR CITY ATTY
TO CONTACT ATTORNEY
FOR Mte. IGNA
BIB]
37659-U01
1971-U02
01-U02
20-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9591-U03
FO9838-U03
DO9971-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
2/6/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1971 01 20 CC MIN (Ìì Ù + pe0004^2
Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council January 20, 1971
Page 22
AT 10:07 P.M. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON MOVED THAT THE CITY ADJOURNED
COUNCIL ADJOURN. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. There were 10:07 P.M.
no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered.
00-
APPROVED: t^f}!^^/ 3 1971
/
Date of Distribution to City Council: /^. /^^ y 1971
// // /
Date of Distribution to Departments: / U^^^M^/^ 9 * 1971
BIB]
37659-U01
1971-U02
01-U02
20-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9591-U03
FO9838-U03
DO9971-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
2/6/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1971 01 20 CC MIN (Ìì Ù + peCITY OF BALDWIN PARK
BID OPENING
ITEM APPROXIMATE
NO. QUANTITIES
1. Lump Sum
2. 1260 Cu Yds
3. Lump Sum
4. 1150 Lin Ft
5. 1335 L1n Ft
6. 24600 Sq Ft
7. 15400 Sq Ft
8. 12900 Sq Ft
9. 3260 Lin Ft
10. 1585 Lin Ft
11. Lump Sum
12. 250 Lin Ft
13. Lump Sum
14. Lump Sum
15. Lump Sum
16. 48 Each
CONSTRUCTION OF CENTRAL PARK WEST, INCLUDING GRADING, LANDSCAPING AND SPRINKLER SYSTEM
DECEMBER 28, 1970 2:15 P.M.
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Landscape Services, Inc. Moulder Bros. Contractors Imperial Landscape Co. G.T.S. Company Hydro Dig Inc.
1963 S. Myrtle Avenue P.O. Box 3306 P.O. Box 217 1343 E. 7th Street 2001 E. Lambert Road
Monrovia, California Glendale, California Brea. California Long Beach, Calif. La Habra, California
$ 2.19 $ 825 2759 14490 00 00 00 $ 1.92 $ 6028.00 2419.20 13596.00 $ 2.65 1800.00 3339.00 14243.00 $ 3.88 7800.00 4888.80 13600.00 i $ 1102.00 3308.00 11195.00
3.85 4427 50 2.11 2426.50 3.40 3910.00 6.60 7590.00 $ 5.00 5750.00
96 1281 60 55 734.25 81 1081.35 60 801.00 3.00 4005.00
39 9594 00 352 8659.20 39 9594.00 36 8856.00 1.05 25830.00
24 3696.00 235 3619.00 305 4697.00 15 2310.00 08 1232.00
27 3483 00 296 3818.40 285 3676.50 20 2580.00 139 1793.10
91 2966.60 844 2751.44 79 2575.40 92 2999.20 70 2282.00
3.75 5943 75 3.74 5927.90 4.00 6340.00 3.75 5943.75 4.40 6974.00
489 00 782.00 925.00 400.00 325.00
5.50 1375 00 5.50 1375.00 5.25 1312.50 7.50 1875.00 5.50 1375.00
2852 00 4903.00 6661.00 2700.00 04 3868.00
1200 00 196.00 2032.00 850.00 150.00
2604.00 2273.00 2975.00 1700.00 60.00
27.40 1315 20 33.68 1616.64 31.19 1497.12 45.00 2160.00 26.50 1272.00
BIB]
37659-U01
1971-U02
01-U02
20-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9591-U03
FO9838-U03
DO9971-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
2/6/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1971 01 20 CC MIN (Ìì Ù + peCITY OF BALDWIN PARK
BID OPENING
CONSTRUCTION OF CENTRAL PARK WEST. INCLUDING GRADING, LANDSCAPING AND SPRINKLER SYSTEM
DECEMBER 28, 1970 2:15 P.M.
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
United Sprinkler Co.
J. E. Stover
P.O. Box 3585
South El Monte, Calif.
ITEM APPROXIMATE
NO. QUANTITIES
Coy1e,"O.K.
General Contractor
P.O. Box 802
La Habra, California
Landscape Contractor
Roy C. Barnett
2908 Jefferson Street
Riverside, California
California Landscape Inc
7050 Deerinq
Canoga Park, California
Aide's Landscaping Co.
611 Obispo Avenue
Long Beach, California
Lump Sum $ 800 00 $ 10700.00 $ 5000.00 S 800.00 $ 1000.00
1260 Cu Yds $ 1.50 1890 00 $ 1.40 1764.00 $ 2.00 2520.00 $ 1.94 2444.40 $ 3.50 4410.00
Lump Sum 16000 00 11845.00 23000.00 18400.00 15500.00
1150 Lin Ft 4.00 4600 00 1.85 2127.50 4.00 4600.00 3.85 4427.50 3.85 4427.50
1335 Lib Ft 2.10 2803 50 94 1254.90 2.00 2670.00 1.50 2002.50 85 1134.75
24600 Sq Ft 352 8659 20 39 9594.00 10000.00 345 8487.00 10750.00
15400 Sq Ft 35 5390 00 21 3234.00 20 3080.00 36 5544.00 40 6160.00
12900 Sq Ft 30 3870 00 17 2193.00 25 3225.00 31 3999.00 33 4257.00
3260 Lin Ft 70 2282 00 1.10 3586.00 70 2282.00 93 3031.80 1.00 3260.00
1585 Lin Ft 6.00 9510 00 5.00 7925.00 3.50 5547.50 5.00 7925.00 5.50 8717.50
Lump Sum 1050 00 900.00 500.00 862.00 1000.00
250 Lin Ft 12.00 3000 00 7.00 1750.00 20.00 900.00 5.50 1375.00 7.00 1750.00
Lump Sum 3910 00 7980.00 3500.00 4800.00 3600.00
Lump Sum 1100 00 1250.00 1500.00 1800.00 1600.00
Lump Sum 2470.00 375.00 500.00 1124.00 1050.00
48 Each 35.00 1680.00 32.00 1536.00 40.00 1920.00 35.00 1680.00 43.00 2064.00
Page 1
BIB]
37659-U01
1971-U02
01-U02
20-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9591-U03
FO9838-U03
DO9971-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
2/6/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1971 01 20 CC MIN (Ìì Ù + pe
Cit Con: / of Baldwin Park struction of Cent» Bid Open a1 Park ing est, Incit iding Grad' ing, Lai ndscapil ig ai nd Sprinkle r Syst em D( C-P< scerr ity ige iber 28, 1( Halt Coi
2 mjnci 2:15 P.M 1 Chambers
ITEI NO APPROXI-MATF QUANTITIES Land; scape 5ervi ces. Inc. Mou1< jer Bro; 5. C( 3ntractors Impe rial L. andscape Co. G T.S. Coi wai iy H. ydro Dig I nc.
17. SUE 33136 Sq Ft i-TOTAL $ 02 $ 662.72 59964.37 $ 035 $ 1159.76 62285.29 $ 0365 $ 1209.46 67868.33 $ 04 $ 1325.44 68379.19 $ 1.975 $ 654.00 7117^ in
18. 19. Lump Sum Lump Sum 13275.00 12648.00 2388.00 1818.00 11434.00 1385.00 12900.00 16470.00 2700.00 630.00 l?fin nn
20. Lump Sum 247.00 973.00 620.00 1300.00 650.00
21. Lump Sum 124.80 137.00 110.00 175.00 6.00 156.00
22. 3 Each 215 00 645.00 330 00 990.00 300.00 900.00 330.00 990.00 225.00 675.00
23. 5 Each 65 00 325.00 71 40 357.00 30.00 150.00 108.00 540.00 44.00 n nn
24. 2 Each 325 00 650.00 215 00 430.00 300 00 600.00 380.00 760.00 244.00 dRft nn
25. 26. 27. 28. 156 Each 591 Each 2840 Each 125 Each 13.40 1.50 1.50 6.10 2090.40 886.50 4260.00 762.50 13.19 2.06 1.94 5.16 2057.64 1217.46 5509.60 645.00 14 21 07 02 66 97 2194.92
1193.82 4714.40 996.25 10.00 2.00 1.50 7.00 l*^i rw.^w 1 vv i j \j\j f uy \j\j1560.00 1182.00 4260.00 875.00 16.50 2.00 2.00 i f—r * W2574.00 1182.005680.00 7nn nn
29. Lump Sum on-nn
79 nn /^.UU 200.00 100.00 97^ nn
30. 31. 6 Each Lump Sum 51. 00 306.00 429.00 72. 00 432.00 427.00 69.23 415.38 410.00 75.00 450.00 400.00 u 41.00 L( \J\J246.00 l^o in
32. A. 1 Each 1254.00 1254.00 1^66. 00 1566.00 1310. 00 1310.00 1329.00 1329.00 1235.00 1°^ nn
B. 1 Each 1575. 00 1575.00 1936. 00 1936.00 1536.00 1536.00 1641.00 1641.00 1530.00 l530.nn
L. i hach 1772. 00 1772.00 2188.00 2188.00 1695. 00 1695.00 1857.00 1857.00 1735.00 1735.00
BIB]
37659-U01
1971-U02
01-U02
20-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9591-U03
FO9838-U03
DO9971-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
2/6/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1971 01 20 CC MIN (Ìì Ù + peDecember 28, 1970 2:15 P.M.
City Hall Council Chambers
Page 2a
City of Baldwin Park Bid Opening
Construction of Central Parkiest, Including Grading, Landscaping and Sprinkler System
California Landscaoe Inc. Aide's Landscaping Co.
ITEM APPROXIMATE
NO. QUANTITIES
Coyle, 0. K.
General Contractor
United Sprinkler Co.
J. E. Slover
Landscape Contractor
Roy C. Barnett
17. 33136 Sq Ft $ 05 $ 1656.80 $ 06 $ 1988.16 $ 10 $ 3313.60 $ 035 S 1159.76 $ 10 $ 3313.60
SUB-TOTAL 70671.50 70002.56 74058.10 69861.96 73994.35
18. Lump Sum 12463.00 16200.00 16000.00 15000.00 16080.00
19. Lump Sum 1340.00 1300.00 1000.00 2000.00 2674.00 1530.00
20. Lump Sum 1200.00 1175.00 1000.00 1116.00 1550.00
21. Lump Sum 104.00 440.00 5.00 130.00 115.00 260.00
22. 3 Each 350.00 1050.00 350.00 1050.00 300.00 900.00 519.00 1557.00 450.00 1350.00
23. 5 Each 75.00 375.00 62.00 310.00 50.00 250.00 76.00 380.00 180.00 900.00
24. 2 Each 500.00 1000.00 380.00 760.00 300.00 600.00 388.00 776.00 328.50 657.00
25. 156 Each 13.80 2152.80 17.00 2652.00 10.00 1560.00 15.75 2457.00 18.00 2808.00
26. 591 Each 1.73 1022.43 2.65 1566.15 4.00 2364.00 2.38 1406.58 2.75 1625.25
27. 2840 Each 1.73 4913.20 2.40 6816.00 3.00 8520.00 2.30 6532.00 2.65 7526.00
28. 125 Each 9.20 1150.00 12.00 1500.00 10.00 1250.00 10.26 1282.50 14.00 1750.00
29. Lump Sum 765.000 525.00 300.00 159.00 400.00
30. 6 Each 50.00 300.00 72.00 432.00 100.00 600.00 73.00 438.00 150.00 900.00
31. Lump Sum 400.00 410.00 1000.00 430.00 670.00
32. A. 1 Each 1100.00 1100.00 1390.00 1390.00 1150.00 1150.00 1467.00 1467.00 1490.00 1490.00
B. 1 Each 1400.00 1400.00 1795.00 1795.00 1 500.00 1500.00 1804.00 1804.00 1895.00 1895.00
C. 1 Each 1590.00 1590.00 1835.00 1835.00 1700.00 1700.00 2033.00 2033.00 2135.00 2135.00
BIB]
37659-U01
1971-U02
01-U02
20-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9591-U03
FO9838-U03
DO9971-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
2/6/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1971 01 20 CC MIN (Ìì Ù + pe
December 28, 1970 2:15 P.M.
City Hail Council Chambers
Page 3
Hydro Dig Inc.
City of Baldwin Park Bid Opening
Construction of Central Park West, Including Grading, Landscaping and Sprinkler System
Landscape-Services, Inc. Moulder Bros. Contractors Imperial Landscape Co. G.T.S. Company
ITEM APPROXIMATE
W. QUANTITIES
32. D. 1 Each
E. 1 Each
33. 18 Each
SUB-TOTAL
TOTAL
$ 890.00 $ 890.00 $1132.00 $ 1132.00 $1045.00 $ 1045.00 $1000.00 $ 1000.00 $ 897.00 $ 897.00
563.00 563.00 145.00 2610.00 718.00 718 232.00 4176 00 00 790.00 200.00 790.00 3600.00 600.00 600.00 150.00 2700.00 568.00 * 44.00 ** 64.00 568.00 792.00 1152.00
35253.20 39429 70 35299.77 37319.00 38604.10
$ 95217.57 $101714 99 $103168.10 $105698.19 $109779.20
W BID BOND m BID BOND 10°/ BID BOND m BID BOND * Benches ** Tables
I, THELMA L. BALKUS, CITY CLERK of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby Certify that Shirley Dospitat, Deputy City Clerk, opened the foregoing bids in the
Council Chambers of the City Halt at 2:15 p.m., December 28, 1970, in the presence of City Manager Nordby, City Engineer French, Office Engineer Caressio
and Director of Recreation and Parks Lucas.
y-,&ji^
THELMA L. BALKUS, CITY CLERK
BIB]
37659-U01
1971-U02
01-U02
20-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9591-U03
FO9838-U03
DO9971-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
2/6/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1971 01 20 CC MIN (Ìì Ù + peDecember 28, 1970 2:15 P.M,
City Hall Council Chambers
Page 3a
City of Baldwin Park Bid Opening
Construction of Central Park West, Including Grading, Landscaping and Sprinkler System
California Landscape Inc. Aide's Landscaping Co.
ITEM APPROXIMATE
NO. QUANTITIES
Coyte, 0. K.
General Contractor
United Sprinkler Co.
J. E. Slover
Landscape Contractor
Roy C. Barnett
32. D. 1 Each $ 770.00 $ 770.00 $ 790.00 $ 790.00 $ 900.00 $ 900.00 $1073.00 $ 1073.00 $1000.00 $ 1000.00
E. 1 Each 450.00 450.00 620.00 620.00 500.00 500.00 696.00 696.00 640.00 640.00
33. 18 Each 300.00 5400.00 162.00 2916.00 500.00 500.00 270.00 4860.00 50.00 900.00
SUB-TOTAL 38945.43 44482.15 42724.00 46256.08 46066.25
TOTAL $109616.93 $i 14484.71 $1 16782.10 $i 16118.04 $120060.60
10% BID BOND 10% BID BOND 10% BID BOND W BID BOND 10% BID BOND
I, THELMA L. BALKUS, CITY CLERK of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby Certify that Shirley Dospitat, Deputy City Clerk, ooened the foregoing bids in the
Council Chambers of the City Hall at 2:15 p.m., December 28, 1970, in the presence of City Manager Nordby, City Engineer French, Office Engineer Caressio
and Director of Recreation and Parks Lucas.
J^^^^^-^^
THELMA L. BALKUS, CITY CLERK
BIB]
37659-U01
1971-U02
01-U02
20-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9591-U03
FO9838-U03
DO9971-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
2/6/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1971 01 20 CC MIN (Ìì Ù + peREGULAR MEETING OF THE BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER) 14403 East Pacific Avenue
In accordance with Section 2703 of the Municipal Code
the City Council met in open meeting at 7:00 p.m. in
the Conference Room for an informal session with the
Staff to be informed on regular agenda items.
The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park met in
regular session at the above place at 7:30 p,m,
Councilman Gregory led the salute to the flag.
Roll Call: Present: COUNCILMEN BLEWETT, GREGORY.
HAMILTON, KING. AND
MAYOR MC CARON
JANUARY 20, 1971
7:30 P.M.
FLAG SALUTE
ROLL CALL
Also Present
Absent
CITY MANAGER NORDBY, CITY
ATTORNEY FLANDRICK. CITY
ENGINEER FRENCH, PLANNING
DIRECTOR CHIVETTA, FINANCE
DIRECTOR DUNCAN. CHIEF OF
POLICE ADAMS. AND CITY
CLERK BALKUS
CITY TREASURER CODLING
00-
CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARINGS
A proposed amendment to the
Baldwin Park Municipal Code to
determine regulations pertaining
to on-premise signs within the City
of Baldwin Park. Initiated by the
Baldwin Park Plannina Commission
1. AMENDMENT TO
ZONING CODE
CASE NO. AZC-43
CONTINUATION OF
PUBLIC HEARINGS
CONTINUED TO
FEBRUARY 3, 1971
2.
Z-330
Proposed red assification from
C-2 A) heavy commercial, one 1)
acre or more to develop) to C-2
heavy commercial) or a more
restrictive zone on certain real
property as follows:
AREA 1. Those properties bounded
on the southeast by Baldwin Park
Boulevard; on the West by Tracy
Street; on the Northeast by
Francisquito Avenue; on the Northwest
by a line 630 feet Southeast of the
center line of Robinette Avenue and
running parallel to said Avenue.
AREA 11. Those properties bounded
on the Northwest by Baldwin Park
Boulevard; on the Northeast by
Francisquito Avenue; on the Southeast
by the Southern Pacific Railroad
right-of-way; on the South by the
Northeasterly rear property tines of
those properties fronting on Garvey
Avenue presently zoned C-1.
Initiated by the Baldwin Park
Planning Commission.
CONTINUED TO
FEBRUARY 17, 1971
BIB]
37659-U01
1971-U02
01-U02
20-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9591-U03
FO9838-U03
DO9971-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
2/6/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
1971 01 20 CC MIN (Ìì Ù + peJANUARY 20, 1971
PAGE 2
3. WALNUT STREET ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
CONTINUED TO
FEBRUARY 3. 1971
AT 10:07 P.M. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON MOVED THAT THE
CITY COUNCIL ADJOURN. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED
There were no objections. The motion carried and
was so ordered.
00-
/
YHUMA L. BALKU$, CiTV CL^k
DATE: JANUARY 21, 1971
TIME: 10:00 A.M.
BIB]
37659-U01
1971-U02
01-U02
20-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9591-U03
FO9838-U03
DO9971-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
2/6/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06
pe00047^T-1-
Regular Meet-ing of the Baldwin Park City Council January 20, 1971
Page 11
The Planning Commission feels this roll back is a means
of trying to encourage development on a different scale
than what has been tried with C-2 A), and that by
rolling back the property, it would then be put back on
the market where developers could purchase it at today's
market value, and then develop the property. Developers
will not purchase property in this area at $5.00 a square
foot, at today's market value. The C-2 A) zoning has
created a false economy. This is the second rolling
back of zoning; the first was adjacent to the City Hall
on Ramona Boulevard and Depot, which was zoned M-1 and
rolled back to C-2 to encourage a commercial complex in
keeping with the Civic Center and the community business
district. This is what the Planning Commission is proposing
in this area, and will be proposing in the future in other
areas in the conmunity.
Planning Director Chivetta stated, in answer to a question
by Mayor McCaron, that six parcels were recommended for
R-3 by the staff to the Planning Commission; however, the
Commission felt the entire area should be roiled back to
R-1, with the exception of the areas previously pointed
out, which are now being used as C-2.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED DISCUSSION
Councilman Btewett asked whether the R-3 on Garvey would be
rezoned. Planning Director Chivetta answered that this
property was not part of this zone change, but is one of
the areas the Commission is considering throughout the
corrmunity on zones that should be changed to fit in with
the use of the land.
Councilman King asked whether Planning Director Chivetta
felt the R-3 properties in the area not being utilized as
such would still be compatible with the area if left R-3.
Planning Director Chivetta responded that the Commission
made an extensive study on this some years ago, and tried
to encourage development in the area. They felt this
particular location with R-3 would supplement a commercial
development in the adjacent location, and would be in'a
prime location for access to the freeways in an east/west
direction, and was a desirable location for multiple family
zoning. Councilman King stated it might be better for the
R-3 development to be on a major artery within the community,
rather than along a freeway, which would give us nothing
except a subsidy on the part of the community.
Planning Director Chivetta stated that this particular R-3
on Francisquito is on a major artery; however. Tracy is a
local collector street. Councilman King asked whether it
was felt the Planning Commission's plan, which had been
submitted some time ago, would stilt be compatible with
this particular area today. Planning Director Chivetta
stated he felt it would, for multiple family developments;
however, the tight-money situation prevailing in the past
two years has precluded development of the area on a large
scale basis. Councilman King commented that at this
particular time there was no major development, and yet
the problems as far as revenue are concerned are being
compounded by more land being zoned for apartments and no
apartments being built. Planning Director Chivetta
stated that the Commission's recommendation is not to give
more multiple family zoning in this particular area, but
to roll it back to R-1, single-family development, which
would be sort of a holding zone" to encourage developers
to create a commercial complex.
Planning Director Chivetta stated the Commission is
considering a complete overhauling of the entire zone
Continued)
BIB]
37659-U01
1971-U02
01-U02
20-U02
CC-U02
MIN-U02
LI1-U03
FO9591-U03
FO9838-U03
DO9971-U03
C4-U03
MINUTES1-U03
2/6/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04
REGULAR-U05
SESSION-U05
CITY-U06
COUNCIL-U06