The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1971 03 17 CC MIN1971 03 17 CC MIN(ÌìÙ¯#peINDEX MARCH 17. 1971 Page Oath of Office Patrolman Raymond James Majeski 1 Minutes February 3, 1971 Approved 1 Treasurer's Report February 28, 1971 Received and Filed 1 Res. No. 71-74 Claims and Demands Adopted 1 71-S-9 1 protest, Mrs. Dorothy Neilson Res. No. 71-77 Adopted 2 CP-154 St. Stephen Baptist Church 2 Testimony Rev. Wilbert McCall Discussion 3 & 4 Testimony W. A. Burkey, Lester Hildreth, David Mitchell 5 Testimony Charles Newcomb Public Hearing Closed Discussion 6 & 7 CP-154 Denied 8 ZV-234 Personal Christianity Chapel 8 Testimony Dr. C.S. Lovett, Pastor 9 ZV-234 10 Ft. variance granted 10 Public Hearing re Personnel Rules and Regulations re disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 10 Testimony James Q. Gibson, Ken Caresio, President, Employees Association 11 Testimony A1 Benzor President, Baldwin Park Police Association 12 Public Hearing dosed Discussion 12 Res. No. 71-78 Amending Personnel Rules and Regulations) Adopted as Amended 13 Public Hearing 70-S-21, 33, 39, 41, 42 and 52 Public Hearing Closed 14 Res. No. 71-75 70-S-21, 33, 39, 41, 42 & 52) Adopted 15 Community Redevelopment Agency on Agenda for April 7, 1971 15 71-N-3 Dismissed 15 71-N-4 Testimony, Bill Nichots 15 Res. No. 71-79 71-N-4) Adopted Staff Report Amended 16 Res. No. 71-80 70-N-65) Adopted 16 Res. No. 71-81 70-N-99) Adopted 17 71-A-8 and 71-A-9 Dismissed 17 Res. No. 71-82 71-C-8) Adopted 17 71-C-10 17 Res. No. 71-83 71-C-10) Adopted 18 71-C-12 Testimony Mrs. Martinez Res. No. 71-84 Adopted 18 Res. No. 71-85 70-W-73 & 70-W-81) Adopted 19 Public Hearing Z-334 C-1 to R-1 Approved Attorney to Draw Papers Effecting Reclassification 19 Public Hearing Z-335 C-1 to more Restrictive Parcel 12 to Remain C-1 Approved Attorney to Draw Papers Effecting Reclassification 20 Public Hearing Precise Plan Development Ord. AZC-46 20 Testimony Emmitt Waldo 21 Public Hearing Closed AZC-46 Ordinance to be Redrawn as Amended 22 Public Hearing AZC-47 Testimony, Robert Imp Public Hearing Closed 23 Council Concurred with Planning Commission Attorney to Draw up the Necessary Papers Reflecting the Changes 24 Public Hearing SP-20 Deletion of Proposed Future Street Dart Street Approved 24 Recessed at 11:00 p.m. 24 Reconvened at 11:15 p.m. 24 BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 03-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9976-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 03 17 CC MIN(ÌìÙ¯#peIndex March 17, 1971 Page 2 Mrs. E. Igna Re Eminent Domain Page 24 & 25 Michael Dargus Re Briefing Session before Council Meeting 26 Mrs. Amos Slater Re Redevelopment Agency 26 Claim S.C. Rains Denied and Referred to Insurance Carrier 27 Temporary Use Permits Chamber of Commerce March December Approved 27 Budget in Process of being Prepared 27 Cable T.V. Ad Hoc Committee to study matter 27 Res. No. 71-76 70-S-44, 45, 50, 54, 56 and 57) Adopted 28 Sewer Construction Work on Garvey West of Big Dalton G.W. Shore Accepted Engineer to File Notice of Completion 28 Res. No. 71-86 Imposing Certain Vehicular Traffic Regulations No Parking Areas) Adopted 28 Report re City-Owned Property at Francisquito and Frazier City Engineer to Obtain Estimates of Value and Negotiate with Adjoining Owners or Put Out for Public Bid 28 & 29 Res. No. 71-87 Authorizing the Filing of an Application with the California Division of Highways for an Area-Wide Topics Plan and Study Adopted 29 Res. No. 71-88 Finding and Determining that the Public Interest, Convenience and Necessity Require the Acquisition of Certain Rights-of-Way for Public Street and a11 Uses Appurtenant Thereto Walnut Street) Adopted 29 Reports re Annexation No. 21 29 Request for Moratorium on House Relocations Approved 30 Ord. No. 587 Amending the Zoning Map of Said City and Rezoning Certain Herein Described Real Property from Zone C-1 to Zone C-2 Zone Case No. Z-333 13247 Garvey) Introduced 30 Discussion re Adjourned Meeting and Agenda Scheduling 30 Civil Defense Commended for Work During Earthquake Disaster 30 Adjourned 12:23 a.m. to Tuesday, March 23. 1971 at 7:00 p.m. 31 BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 03-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9976-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 03 17 CC MIN(ÌìÙ¯#peoco-mo REGULAR MEETING OF THE BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS) 14403 East Pacific Avenue In accordance with Section 2703 of the Municipal Code the City Council met In open meeting at 7:00 p.m. In the Conference Room for an Informal session with the Staff to be Informed on regular agenda Items. The City Council of the City of Baldwin Par< met In regular session at the above place at 7:30 p.m. Councilman Gregory led the salute to the flag. Present: COUNCILMEN BLEWETT. GRE60RY. HAMILTON, KING, AND MAYOR MC CARON Roll Call: MARCH 17, 1971 7:30 P.M. FLAG SALUTE ROLL CALL Also Present: CITY MANAGER NORDBY. CITY ATTORNEY FLANDRICK. CITY ENGINEER FRENCH. PLANNING DIRECTOR CHIVETTA. FINANCE DIRECTOR DUNCAN. CHIEF OF POLICE ADAMS, CITY TREASURER CODLING. AND CITY CLERK BALKUS 00- City Clerk Batkus administered the Oath of Office to Patrolman Raymond James Majeski. following which the Mayor presented Patrolman Majeski with his badge and congratulated Mm. 00- COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT THE MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 3, 1971 BE APPROVED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- COUNCILMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT THE CITY TREASURER'S REPORT OF FEBRUARY 28. 1971 BE RECEIVED AND FILED. COUNCILMAN KING'SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- RESOLUTION NO. 71-74 ALLOWING CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK COUNCILMAN HAMILTON MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 71-74 BE ADOPTED AS AMENDED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. Roil call. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- City Clerk Balkus administered the oath to those In the audience desiring to be heard during the meeting. 00- OATH OF OFFICE PATROLMAN RAYMOND JAMES MAJESKI MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 3, APPROVED 1971 TREASURER'S REPORT FEBRUARY 28. 1971 RECEIVED AND FILED RES. NO. 71-74 CLAIMS & DEMANDS 2036 2145 PAYROLL PERIOD 2/16/71 2/28/71 RES. NO. 71-74 ADOPTED OATH BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 03-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9976-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 03 17 CC MIN(ÌìÙ¯#peeco^i Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council PUBLIC HEARINGS 7:30 p.m. having arrived it was the time and place fixed for a continued public hearing on 71-S-9. a Short Form 1911 Act, on the north side of Olive Street between La Rica Avenue and Baldwin Park Boulevard for sidewalk and drive aporoach. Continued from March 3, 1971.) Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. City Engineer French stated one protest had been filed in the form of a letter, from Mrs. Dorothy Nell son, 14107 E. Olive Street, indicating the cost of the Improve- ment would create a hardship for her. He stated he had written to Mrs. Neilson on February 18, 1971 explaining to her that the first payment wouldn't be until December 1972; he again wrote to her on March 11, 1971 infonhinq her that the matter had been held over, and asked that she reply to him; to date, he has had no response and has been unable to make contact with her. Councilman King stated that possibly because of the delayed payment. Mrs. Nell son was no longer concerned and this miqht be the reason for her not respondino. As there was no one in the audience deslrinq to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to 71-S-9, Mayor McCaron declared the public hearing dosed. RESOLUTION'NO. 71-77 ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS PURSUANT TO SECTION 5870. ET SEQ., OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE 71-S-9) City Engineer French stated that Section 1(c) should read that one written protest was filed and the objection was overruled. COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 71-77 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- It was the time and place fixed for a continued public hearing on CP-154, an appeal on an application for a conditional use permit to vary with Ordinance No. 357, Section 9472. subsection 7 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code to construct a new church on property located in an R-1 single family residential) Zone at 14442 Merced Avenue. Applicant Is St. Stephen Baptist Church. Continued from March 3. 1971.) Planning Director Chivetta stated the staff had conducted a study, at the Council's request, and had provided Council with the report. He stated there are problems in the area by uses being permitted through variances or conditional use permits that are creating deterioration in the area. He stated the staff recommends that a complete overhaul of the conditional use permit procedure be undertaken by the Planning Commission, and at the direction of the Council, to restrict certain uses in an R-1 Zone that would not be compatible with certain other uses located adjacent to the freeway frontage road; also. that the Council instruct the Planning Commission to study the possibility of adopting a freeway approach zone. which would encourage development on a large scale for specified uses. such as motels. restaurants, car sates, trailer sates, and similar uses. Continued) March 17. 1971 Page 2 PUBLIC HEARINGS 7:30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING SHORT FORM 71-S-9 S&DA) POSTINGS & MAILINGS ONE WRITTEN PROTEST PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED 71-S-9 RES. NO. 71-77 ORDERING CONSTRUCTION 71-S-9 RES. NO. 71-77 ADOPTED PUBLIC HEARING CP-154 ST. STEPHEN BAPTIST CHURCH RESUME BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 03-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9976-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 03 17 CC MIN(ÌìÙ¯#pei CC 0-^32 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council March 17, 1971 Paoe 3 Mr. Chivetta stated the Commission recommended approval of the church use. Mr. Chivetta posted on the wall a sketch of the proposed church facility. He stated that the property has 90 feet of frontage along Merced Avenue and is 404 feet in depth. The church is proposing a three-phase development; under phase one, the existing single-family residence will be converted into classrooms and sanctuary; phase two will be a classroom structure and temporary sanctuary; and phase three win be the completed sanctuary at the front of the property. Mr. Chivetta stated that the Planning Commission Informed the applicant that the total project should take ho longer than five years, and the pastor. Reverend McCall, was In complete agreement with this proposal. Mr. Chivetta stated there was a petition filed by seventeen prooerty owners In the area appealing the decision of the Planninq Commission. Mayor McCaron stated the Council was interested In what type of usage might be expected in this area, and Whether the proposed usage would be compatible with comnercial usage. He stated also that there have been inquiries. regarding the development of the area across the street from the area in question, which is approximately 15 acres. Mayor McCaron pointed out that to allow usage for a church would appear to be conflicting, and would not be compatible, and stated he felt there were other areas in the community where this particular usage would fit in better than in this particular spot. He asked Rev. McCall whether they had looked for other locations for their church. Rev* Wllbert McCatI, pastor of St. Stephen Baptist Church, in response to the Mayor's question, stated they had been looking for a long time, trying to find a suitable property for a church. He further stated that the problem mainly has been that they have been competing financially with commercial development, and owners usually want three or four times the amount for the land that they can afford to pay. Mrs. Betty Codling, Director of Industrial and Commercial Development, in response to Mayor McCaron"s question, replied that there is a developer tentatively interested in the property on Puente Avenue, within 600 feet of the proposed church. Councilman Blewett stated there is also commercial interest on Garvey Avenue in this area. Mayor McCaron stated there were also 1'iquor sales in the area, which would possibly conflict with the church. Councilman Hamilton asked whether the Mayor was referring to the property on the east side of Puente Avenue and Mayor McCaron replied he was. Councilman Hamilton stated he cputdn't see where it would conflict, because the proposed church would be across the street and a block plus one lot away from the proposed development. Councilman Btewett indicated the conflict would be from Garvey to Puente. Planning Director Chivetta indicated on the map which area would be in conflict, and also pointed out service stations at the corner of Merced and Puente. Continued) REV. MILBERT MC CALL PASTOR ST. STEPHEN BAPTIST CHURCH BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 03-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9976-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 03 17 CC MIN(ÌìÙ¯#pe1001833 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council March 17, 1971 Page 4 Councilman Blewett asked Rev. McCall whether they had attempted to purchase any existing church facilities. Rev. McCall replied they had approached many, but they did not want to sell. He stated one wanted to sell, but Standard Oil was interested in buying the property. and they couldn't compete with an oil company. Council- man Blewett asked whether they had the type of financing that would enable them to buy an existing facility. Rev. McCall replied it would depend on the facility; he stated they have the backing to enter this type of a transaction. He further stated they have had real estate brokers and many other people looking for a suitable location for two years. He stated they were planning to close escrow last week, but this matter came up. Rev. McCall stated he feels they could develop the area and that the help they would be able to give the boys and girls would far outweigh any tax monies which might be lost by having a church on the property. Mayor McCaron again suggested that possibly a location on Baldwin Park Boulevard, where there are other churches, might be a better location. Councilman Hamilton pointed out that a location on Baldwin Park Boulevard would mean five times the amount in dollars and cents for the land, and churches can't usually afford that kind of money. He reiterated his observation that he could not see where this would hinder development in the near future, and stated he felt it would be an improvement in the community. He stated he felt there is a need in the community for the church and for training the young people. Councilman King stated he disagrees with the Planning Commission, and he doesn't think we should continue to zone away from our commercial areas. He stated we are further encroaching into the commercial areas, especially along the freeway frontages. Councilman King further stated he hoped the church could find a better spot, and as far as the best interests of the City are concerned, he didn't think this was the proper area for this type of zoning. He stated he did not favor this usage for this parcel of land near the freeway. He emphasized that he had nothing against the church, but felt it should not be allowed in this potentially commercial area. Councilman Gregory stated she was not opposing the church; however, she stated that in the past there have been bad experiences with projects being completed in phases. She stated the City does not have the staff to police or enforce the continuation in building of these projects. Councilman Gregory stated that many times the applicant begins a project and then, because of lack of finances, must ask for an extension of time; there are places where the walls have never been put up» and the promises have not been kept, and the City suffers for this, as well as the niehgbors in the area. She further stated this is what must be considered, as well as what would be lost in the way of commercial development if a church were to be allowed in the area. Continued) BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 03-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9976-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 03 17 CC MIN(ÌìÙ¯#peC004834 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council March 17. 1971 Page 5 Rev. McCall stated-he shared Councilman Gregory's concern, and repeated the proposed plans for completion of the church. He stated that during the first staoe, the property would be cleaned up and developed, so that it would be an asset to the community; they would be required to put in curb and gutter, lighting and pavement before they could build anything, so it would not be an eyesore. Mayor McCaron called for further testimony in favor. TESTIMONY WAS GIVEN BY: W. A. Burkey, 13502 Stanstead, Norwalk, stated that he is Superintendent of Missions for the Los Angeles Southern Baptists Association, and that at the present time he is related to three churches already in Baldwin Park. He further stated that St. Stephen Baptist Church has been associated with his group for two years, and this church was presently using rented facilities. He stated that it is their understanding that at least the back portion of the wall is to be completed, and asked for clarifi- cation as to what portion of the wall is to be completed during the initial stages. Planning Director Chivetta stated 100 feet forward from the rear property line on both sides. Mr. Burkey asked what portion of the parking area is required, and Mr. Chivetta replied everything from the front of Phase 3, the sanctuary, to the street. Mr. Burkey asked whether any of the back parking area would be required at this time and Mr. Chivetta replied it would. Mr. Burkey stated that this project appears to be compatible with the R-l zoning in the area, and he felt that the requirements set forth by the Planning Commission would guarantee at least the beautification of the property in the immediate future. He stated he is confident that Rev. McCall and the members of the church would do everything in their power and ability to beautify and complete the project as rapidly as financial resources make it possible; they have backing and they have support, and are capable of securing a loan. Mr. Burkey asked for Council's favorable considera- tion of the appeal. Lester Hildreth. 16313 Cadwell Street, Valinda, stated he is an officer of St. Stephen's Church. He stated they have been meeting in rented facilities, and it doesn't appear that they are making much progress. He stated they have searched a great deal, and there are not many places available when you are competing with commercial; this property seems to be suitable for what they want to do. David Mitchell, architect for the church, stated he had appeared before the Planning Commission, at which time he told them that this site was a rather difficult one in that it has a small street access compared to the length, and also the house is at the rear of the property. He stated he has devised a way wherein they can use the existing house and add to it, and the street side will have a concrete block fence in front of it, with land- scaping. The activities will be at the rear of the property until such time as the new building is obtained. He stated-there would be a minimum of upkeep. Continued) TESTIMONY W. A. BURKEY 13502 STANSTEAD NORWALK LESTER HILDRETH 16313 CADWELL STREET VALINDA DAVID MITCHELL ARCHITECT FOR ST. STEPHEN CHURCH BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 03-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9976-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 03 17 CC MIN(ÌìÙ¯#pe1004835 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council Marchx–Óèê6971 Page 6 Mr. Mitchell stated that St. Stephen's was one of many Southern Baptist ch‘€¬¯t, and though each church is independent, they have help from the other churches, _ÇóÉÀdooperate in any way they can, and that they wilt help to see that the building is adequat·à‚¥¤c help them get the loans through the Home Mission Board. Mr. Mitchell stated he will do ×ä¨bst to make the courch an asset to the community from an architectural standpoint. Char´…ßä„bwcomb, 17827 Laxford, Azusa, stated he was the owner of the property in question. He statÛzŽ¬¯'had talked earlier to City Manager Nordby, and asked him to give a description of the pr7ÓÆ¶¾~ to the Council. Mr. Newcomb stated that when he took over the property in 1968, it was ánË´¦btely run down; he replaced all the windows and cleaned it up. He stated that chilðcrÀnav»"ÊRutroyed the property for the second time this yeau. He further stated that he thouOÐä¾oe church would be a good thing, and it would be good for the children to have a òbß§¯'to go to talk. Mr. Newcont) asked which 17 property owners had appealed on the petitioì ž‡£sy Attorney Flandrick stated the petition was an appeal to the City Council on the Planniné°‡¥jmission's decision. The Code permits such an appeal to be made by any interested persons.DðÐ¡êDity Attorney explained this was not a petition stating a basis for denying the applicatiíhŠä¨rs was merely a process by which it was brought to the Council- Mr. Newcomb stated he fel¨DÁ°êpould be very wise for the Council to pass this. He stated everyone has his constitutional 1971 03 17 CC MIN(ÌìÙ¯ #pe000-7836 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council March 17, 1971 Page 7 Mayor McCaron stated he felt there were sufficient other areas in the community where the church could locate, and he did not feel this is the right spot, because of possible future development in the area. Councilman Gregory stated the staff report on the study which Council asked the Planning Director to prepare pointed out alt the things Council should consider. She stated that, although the property is ideally suited for commercial development, the problem confronting Council is how the applicant is going to finance the building of the church, completion of the various pro- posed phases, etc. She stated the City was making a problem for the applicant which he didn't have originally; he applied for a piece of land to build a church on, and that should be the problem being con- sidered. She stated that she would like to stipulate that if the church is built on this property, it would be walled in, and try to cut down on vandalism, and so on. Councilman Hamilton stated he wouldn't want to go against anything that would encourage commercial development, which the City badly needs, but stated they were only considering possibilities" at this time—perhaps ten or twenty years from now, and this church would be an immediate improvement to that property. He stated that if the property were to be developed ten years from now, there's a good chance that the church would be in a financial position to buy other, more expensive properties. Councilman Hamilton stated there was a need throughout the nation to encourage the young people to get into churches, and there is a great need for spiritual and character training. He stated he didn't feel there would be any development in that area in the near future. Councilman King stated that over the years, it has been said many times that I cannot perceive this particular piece of property being developed as such," but over the years these pieces of property are developed. He re-emphasized that he was not opposed to any church. He stated he feels Baldwin Park is taking second best in all areas; every time a piece of property is deteriorated, the City has to take second best to clean up the area, and he stated he cannot understand why we could not look to the future as far as cleaning up the area. Councilman King stated he thought the City would be sold short by further encroachments into commercial areas. He further stated the Council should study these areas thoroughly, and the Commission should also activate a study. Councilman Btewett stated he feels the freeway frontage of Baldwin Park might very possibly be the City's last hope" of ever raising the assessed valuation in the community. He stated that the church would be a good development, but felt that it should be in a good R-1 area. Councilman Blewett stated we must look to the future of the City of Baldwin Park, and he feels the future for that piece of property must be a commercpal development. He stated that, within a close proximity to this property, there has been a developer interested in developing a cocktail lounge and a motel, which would be very desirable and a church would kill" the development Continued) BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 03-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9976-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 03 17 CC MIN(ÌìÙ¯ #peL-0^837 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council March 17, 1971 Page 8 Councilman Blewett further stated he felt there were other large pieces of property in R-1 zones in the City where the church would be compatible, but not an area that has possible commercial uses. Councilman King stated he feels the area is out of zone at the present time, and should be commercial. City Manager Nordby stated Mr. Newcomb had telephoned him last week to report vandalism at the property. He stated he drove by the property and then got out of the car to look at it from back to front. He stated there had been extensive vandalism and the property was in a disgraceful condition. City Manager Nordby stated he would be meeting tomorrow with a developer interested in the somewhat irmiediate vicinity of the proposed church. He stated he concurred with what Rev. McCall is trying to do, but there is a problem of the balance between commercial and residential developments in Baldwin Park. COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT THE APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL CP-154 DENIED USE PERMIT. CASE CP-154, BE DENIED. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. Roll Call. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN KING, BLEWETT AND MAYOR MCCARON NOES: COUNCILMEN GREGORY AND HAMILTON Councilman Blewett suggested to Rev. McCatI that he contact the Planning Director and he could show him some areas in the community where a church might be compatible. Rev. McCall stated that wherever there is enough room, they are competing with commercial developers, and in R-1 zones, people raise the prices to where they can't afford to buy. Mr. Newcomb asked what could this property be zoned for. Mayor McCaron suggested he present that question to the Planning Commission and they would give him the answer. 00- It was the time and place fixed for a continued public PUBLIC HEARING hearing on Case ZV-234, an appeal on an application for a ZV-234 zone variance to vary with Ordinance No. 357, Section 9552, DR. C.S. LOV'ETT subsection 3 c) to encroach into the rear yard setback PERSONAL CHRISTIANITY fifteen 15) feet in an R-1 single family residential) CHAPEL Zone located on certain real property at 14952 E. Pacific Avenue. Continued from March 3, 1971.) Planning Director Chivetta stated that in view of some RESUME controversy at the last meeting regarding nomenclature on habitable and non-habitable structures, the staff had prepared a brief summary of the verbiage dealing with both, copies of which had been given to Council before the meeting. Continued) BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 03-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9976-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 03 17 CC MIN(ÌìÙ¯#pecoc^s-s Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council March 17, 1971 Page 9 Mr. Chivetta stated the property owner to the rear of the proposal, residing on Stockdale, had submitted a letter to the City Clerk stating he has no objections to the church's proposal, and that he is in full accord that this would not be a detriment to his property. In response to Mayor McCaron's inquiry. Planning Director Chivetta indicated that the present building encroaches 15 feet into the rear yard setback, and stated this came about because the building went in as an accessory use, which can be closer to the rear property tine. Mr. Chivetta stated that because of certain equipment that will be located in the building and the church office located inside the building, the Coinnission feels it is a habitable building and, therefore, sh6u1d observe the rear yard setback. Councilman Hamilton stated he had been down to look at the building, and he feels that if the property owner to the rear has no objections the building addition could extend as far as the present building. Councilman King asked what the noise factor would be because of the duplicating and printing machines. Planning Director Chivetta stated the noise would be minimal, because there would be no openings on the rear wall of the structure. If the back wall were to be soundproofed, the noise would be cut down to zero. Mayor McCaron stated he had looked at the property, arid he was concerned that having the building so close to the other properties might create a fire hazard, in that there would not be proper access for fire-fighting equipment. Mr. Chivetta stated there would be access from either side, but not from the back, and there wilt be a wall along the side property lines and along the rear. Mayor McCaron commented that other zones were not allowed to have this type of encroachment; Mr. Chivetta stated that the M-1 zone rear yard setback is 30 feet if the property abuts R-zoned property. Mayor McCaron stated he felt the Code should be adhered to instead of continuing this usage just because one building is there now. Mr. Chivetta commented that the Planning Commission did deny the request, and the applicant has appealed that denial. TESTIMONY WAS GIVEN BY: Dr. C.S. Lovett, 14952 Pacific Avenue, stated he is the Pastor of the Personal Christianity Chapel, and that they have been in Baldwin Park for 20 years. He stated that they concur with the staff report, and agree with Mr. Chivetta"s recommendation of a compromise of 10 feet, and he stated he hoped Council would concur with this recommendation. In response to a query by Councilman Blewett, Dr. Lovett stated his church does have a structured worship service every week, and that on Sundays the entire congregation also works, putting together literature for distribution. He stated they serve other churches, but he is an ordained Baptist minister and his congregation are Baptists. Continued) TESTIMONY DR. C.S. LOVETT PASTOR. PERSONAL CHRISTIANITY CHAPEL BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 03-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9976-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 03 17 CC MIN(ÌìÙ¯ 1971 03 17 CC MIN(ÌìÙ¯ #peCPC^840 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council TESTIMONY WAS GIVEN BY: James Q. Gibson, 13268 Francisquito, stated he is unalterably opposed to a Personnel Board. He stated that at the time the Personnel Board was formed, he did not feel that the Council was overloaded with work, and they ran for office knowing their compensation was $50 a month; they voted themselves a 400% raise in salary and then appointed a Personnel Board to take away part of their work. Mr. Gibson stated that Mayor McCaron was on the Council at that time, and he was the only one of the five who voted to put the salary raise to a vote of the people. Mr. Gibson commented that when the United States govern- ment was set up, three branches of government Were created, because our forefathers did not want to give too much power to any one office. The Legislative branch has the most power, and he stated this is as it should be, because the legislators are the elected representatives of the people. He stated that the five Council members are in the same position. Mr. Gibson further stated that, in his opinion. Council has no right to relinquish any control of City government to a Personnel Board or to any- one else, and he thinks Council would be derelict in their duty to allow any board to have the final say. He stated the Council is the only way the citizens have anything to say, and he feels they should not relinquish any control of the City government. Ken Caresio. 2702 Caricia Drive, Hacienda Heights, President of the Employees Association, stated that Council wished to know how the employees felt about the proposed changes in the Personnel Rules and Regulations, and so, in cooperation with the Police Association a ballot was distributed to each employee asking whether they wished the rules changed to allow final appeal to the Council, or to remain as presently in force, with the Personnel Board as the final appeal. He stated the results were 112 in favor of the rules remaining as presently in force, with final appeal to the Personnel Board, and 4 in favor of changing the rules to allow a final appeal to Council. Councilman Blewett stated the; only person who would be appealing would be an employee, if he so desired, and commented he could not understand an employee giving up an additional right. He asked City Attorney Flandrick whether the City has the right of appeal. The City Attorney responded that the City has no right of appeal on a disciplinary proceeding; however, with reference to the grievance procedure, the City M&nager would have the right of appeal to the Council above the Personnel Board. Mr. Caresio stated that the Board of Directors are not opposed to the change as any discredit to the Council. but are concerned that in the future a Council might bring up the old patronage system and allow politics to dictate, rather than reason; if the employee had friends on the Council, he might be placed back in a job from which he had been dismissed. Councilman Blewett pointed out that if an employee had friends on the Personnel Board, he could also be reinstated. Mr. Caresio stated this was correct, but they feet the Personnel Board would be less biased, because they are not responsible to their constituents, and don't have to live in the Citv, and would be less personally involved. Continued) March 17. 1971 Page 11 TESTIMONY JAMES Q. GIBSON 13268 FRANCISQUITO KEN CARESIO 2702 CARICIA DRIVE HACIENDA HEIGHTS PRESIDENT, CITY EMPLOYEES ASSN. BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 03-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9976-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 03 17 CC MIN(ÌìÙ¯#peCWMl Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council A1 Benzor, 14818 Jeremie, President of the Baldwin Park Police Association, stated the Association consists of 52 members. He stated they voted along with the City Employees Association, and unanimously voted in favor of the present setup of the Personnel Board being the final appeal. He stated their reasons are similar to those presented by Mr. Caresio, and stated he would appreciate Council's taking this into consideration in their final vote. As there was no one else in the audience desiring to testify either in behalf of or in opposition to amending the Personnel Rules and Regulations, Mayor McCaron declared the public hearing closed. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED City Attorney Flandrick, responding to a question by Mayor McCaron, stated that the proposed changes in the Rules and Regulations insofar as disciplinary action is concerned is it now formalizes the initial proceedings so that the employee is advised of such charges as maty be pending against him, an informal hearing is required to be held before the City Manager, who has the authority at that point, based upon the written reports plus any comments or testimony the employee wishes to submit to him, makes the initial decision whether charges are warranted and proceedings should be commenced. The City Manager can make a decision at that point, and has the authority to reduce or increase the severity of the proposed disciplinary action. Written notice of the City Manager's decision Is given to the employee who has the right, at that point, to appeal the City Manager's decision to the Personnel Board. The question in con- tention is what happens after that point. The procedure is set out that there is a time for the appeal, the manner in which that appeal is to be conducted, the proceedings before the Personnel Board; and the question is shall the latter section of the proposed Exhibit A to the resolution be adopted granting the additional right of appeal from the decision of the Board to the City Council in one of three ways: 1) based solely on the transcript of proceedings before the Board; 2) a partial new hearing where certain issues are to be resolved; or 3) a brand new hearing is to be conducted before the Council. The remaining portions of the Rules spell out precisely what the procedure is for the appellate process; the current rules do not contain the details of this procedure. City Attorney Flandrick stated that, regardless of what Council's action may be on the right of appeal to the Council, he would recommend that the remaining portion of the Rules be placed into effect. He further stated that the City does not presently have a formal grievance procedure, for non-disciplinary action, and it is important to have a format grievance procedure on the books. Mayor McCaron stated the employees are hired by the depart- ment head or the City Manager, and he feels disciplinary action should remain with them; as an added defense for the employee, he would still have an appeal to the Personnel Board. He stated he agrees with the employees' request that the decision be left to the Personnel Board, and stated in a case such as this where the employees overwhelmingly asked for something, he felt it should be granted. Continued) March 17. 1971 Page 12 AL BENZOR 14818 JEREMIE PRES., 8. P. POLICE ASSOCIATION PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED AMEND PERS. RULES AND REGS DISCUSSION BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 03-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9976-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 03 17 CC MIN(ÌìÙ¯#peC 0-7,842 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council MarÏ 8ý+ 1971 Page 13 Councilman King stated he has had many calls regarding this matter, andŒpP³'have all been against Council's relinquishing the right of appeal. He stated he feels h¿£}Z¿kd be shunning his duty to the people if the employee didn't have this last recourse of ap*oYêso the Council. Councilman Blewett stated he couldn't understand the thinking of the eùRdZ³bes in no~ wanting this extra right. He stated that Council is, in reality, responsible Fª+A¢b citizens of the community. He stated he feels Council should be the final say, because ¯çA¢b citizens don't like what the Council men dc, they can vote them out of office. Counc‰rRT¤'Hamilton stated he felt one thing was being overlooked—this was set up for the benefit of–\PÇ employees, and they voted 112 to 4 against the final appeal to Council, so he feels Counc NF¢huld go alonq with the wishes of the empfoyees. He stated he feels the City has GyA¯i along very well with a Personnel Board. Councilman Gregory stated she feels strongly TlAêshis is part of the Council's responsibility, and they should not relinquish the right of@v\¤` the employees' final appeal. She stated an employee does not have to go any further thˆ7A¢b Personnel Board, but if he so desires, should have the right to apoeal to Council. CoULp\¦jan Blewett stated he does not like to be informed of what is going on at City Hkll by somEM}Pêhn the street, or by a telephone call from one of the citizens. He stated he wants instan”sP¥rs communication, and with Council having the final say, perhaps this will come about. €˜|@¤dilman Hamilton stated he wouldn't object to sitting n on an appeal if necessary, but evidEŒ`Y³'the employees don't feel it is necessary. Councilman Btewett brought out the point thaþmxSêshe 112 employees who voted against cippeal to the Council didn't want to, they dÇ6ˆXC&ha‚UØX= but, 4 employeey did vote for that right, and he stated he feels they should have it. RESOLUTION NO. 71-78 OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING THE PERSONNEL RULES AND REGULATIONS OF SAID CITY. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 71-78 BE ADOPTED AS AMENDED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. City Attorney Flandrick stated Exhibit A should be amended on Page 3, line 6 to read the 10th day", and on Page 5. Section 224 should read the 10th day" instead of the 20th day". Roll call. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN BLEWETT, GREGORY. KING NOES: COUNCILMAN HAMILTON AND MAYOR MC CARON 00- RES. NO. 71-78 AMFND PERSONNEL RULES & REGS. RES. NO. 71-78 ADOPTED AS AMENDED BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 03-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9976-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 03 17 CC MIN(ÌìÙ¯#pe1C 0" 8^3 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on 70-S-21, a Short Form 1911 Act, on the northeast side of Cloverslde Street between Feather Avenue and Ahem Drive for sidewalk adjacent to curb and drive approach, to hear any protests in regard to costs. Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. City Engineer French requested that 70-S-22 be dismissed because it has been paid. There were no objections. It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on 70-S-33. a Short Form 1911 Act, on the southwest side of Merced Avenue between Frazier Street and Baldwin Park Boulevard for sidewalk and drive approach, to hear any protests in regard to costs. Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on 70-S-39, a Short Form 1911 Act. on the southeast Slide of Athol Street between Fail Avenue and Francisquito Avenue for curb, gutter, sidewalk and driv6 approach, to hear any protests in regard to costs. Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on 70-S-41, a Short Form 1911 Act, on the northwest side of Puente Avenue between Central Avenue and Pacific Avenue for sidewalk and drive approach, to hear any protests in regard to costs. Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on 70-S-42, a Short Form 1911 Act, on the west side of Benham Avenue between Patm Avenue and Elwyn Drive for sidewalk adjacent to curb and drive approach, to hear any protests in regard to costs, Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on 70-S-52, a Short Form 1911 Act, on the northeast and northwest sides of Arditta Avenue between Dutch Street and the Southeasterly city boundary for sidewalk and drive approach, to hear any protests in regard to costs. Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to 70-S-21, 33, 39, 41, 42, or 52, Mayor McCaron declared the public hearing closed. Continued) March 17. 1971 Page 14 PUBLIC HEARING SHORT FORM 70-S-21 SadjC&DA) POSTINGS. MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS 70-S-22 DISMISSED PUBLIC HEARING SHORT FORM 70-S-33 S&DA) POSTINGS. MAILINGS NO WRITTEhl PROTESTS PUBLIC HEARING SHORT FORM 70-S-39 CGS&DA) POSTINGS, MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS PUBLIC HEARING SHORT FORM 70-S-41 S&DA) POSTINGS. MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS PUBLIC HEARING SHORT FORM 70-S-42 SadjC&DA) POSTINGS. MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS PUBLIC HEARING SHORT FORM 70-S-52 S&DA) POSTINGS. MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED 70-S-21. 33. 39, 41. 42. 52 BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 03-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9976-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 03 17 CC MIN(ÌìÙ¯#peC004.844 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council RESOLUTION NO. 71-75 CONFIRMING CERTAIN REPORTS OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS 70-S-21. 33. 39. 41. 42 & 52) City Engineer French stated that under Section 1(f) the word no" should be inserted. COUNCILMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 71-75 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- Mayor McCaron announced that there would be no discussion this evening on the Comnunity Redevelopment Agency and it would be on the April 7. 1971 agenda. 00" City Engineer French requested that 71-N-3 be dismissed, because the nuisance has been abated. There were no objections. 00- It was the time and placed fixed for a public hearing on 71-N-4 to determine whether certain premises and buildings and structures constitute a public nuisance at 3152 Maine Avenue. Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. City Engineer French presented photographs of the property taken on December 14, 1970 and on March 17, 1971 which depict the condition of the property at various times. He stated it is the staff's recommendation that the one rehabilitatible structure be rehabilitated or demolished within a time limit set by Council and that the remainder of the property be cleaned up. TESTIMONY WAS GIVEN BY: Bill Nichols, owner of the property at 3152 Maine Avenue, stated notices have been sent to the wrong person regardinq ownership of the property. He stated that in the past, they have cleaned up the property, and it was clean at present, with the exception of a truck and a trailer there. He stated that every time he tries to se11 the property, the prospective buyer sees the condemnation notices and backs off". Councilman Blewett asked whether this is the house that had been vacant for a number of years. Mr. Nichols replied it is. and it has been vacant because he has no further use for it and would like to se11 it. He further stated it is difficult to obtain financing in this area, and hasn't had much luck in trying to se11 the house. Councilman King asked Mr. Nichols why he hadn't taken the initiative in trying to upgrade the property so it wouldn't deteriorate the surrounding properties. Mr. Nichols replied he didn't think it deteriorated surrounding properties, and none of the houses were fancy. He stated his property was clean. Continued) March 17. 1971 Page 15 RES. NO. 71-75 CONFIRMING COSTS 70-S-21. 33. 39. 41. 42 & 52) SECTION 1(f) WORD NO" INSERTED RES. NO. 71-75 ADOPTED C.R.A. ON AGENDA FOR APRIL 7. 1971 71-N-3 DISMISSED PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC NUISANCE 71-N-4 PHOTOS RESUME TESTIMONY BILL NICHOLS. OWNER 3152 MAINE AVENUE BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 03-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9976-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 03 17 CC MIN(ÌìÙ¯#pe00048^5 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council 1971 March 17. Page 16 Councilman Gregory stated the photographs taken as late as this date depict the yard as being in a deplorable state. She asked how often Mr. Nichols gets back to town to take care of the property, and he replied about once a month. He stated the weeds are mowed and kept down in the front, but the back is hoed once or twice a year. He stated all the debris has been hauled off the property, and there is nothing there except a truck, a small tractor and a trailer. Mayor McCaron comnented that this house has a history of nuisances against it. He stated the house never was completed to where it was habitable for sale, and doesn't think the condemnation notices are what is holding up the sale of the property. Mayor McCaron stated that this has been a continuing problem, and suggested that if Mr. Nichols cannot sell it with the improvements on it, perhaps he should remove the structures and sell it as vacant ground. City Engineer French stated the Staff Report recommenda- tion should be altered to read, under Item 1, Demolish or rehabilitate structure on Lot 38..,......" The structure referred to is designated on the plot plan as 3152 Maine Avenue and is located on Lot 38. Items 2 and 3 stand as recommendations of the Staff, Item 2 relating to Lot 43 and Item 3 relating to both lots* As there was no one else in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to 71-N-4, Mayor McCaron declared the public hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 71-79 FINDING AND DETERMINING THE EXISTENCE OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING THE SAME ABATED 71-N-4) City Engineer French stated that under Section 2 a time limit of 90" days should be inserted. COUNCILMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 71-79 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- AMEND STAFF REPORT TO READ UNDER ITEM 1 DEMOLISH OR REHAB. RES. NO. 71-74 ORDER ABATEMENT 71-N-4) SECTION 2 90" DAYS TO ABATE RES. NO. 71-79 ADOPTED It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on 70-N-65, 13923 Merced Avenue, in regard to the cost of abating the public nuisance. Proper postings and mailings had Deen accomplished. There were no written protests. As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to 70-N-65, Mayor McCaron declared the public hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 71-80 CONFIRMING THE CITY MANAGER'S REPORT REGARDING CERTAIN SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 70-N-65) COUNCILMAN HAMILTON MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 71-80 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC NUISANCE 70-N-65 POSTINGS, MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED 70-N-65 RES. NO. 71-80 CONFIRMING CITY MGR'S. REPORT RE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT RES. NO. 71-80 ADOPTED BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 03-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9976-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 03 17 CC MIN(ÌìÙ¯#pe0004846 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on 70-N-99, 4719 Merced Avenue, in regard to the cost of abating the public nuisance. Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to 70-N-99. Mayor McCaron declared the public hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 71-81 CONFIRMING THE CITY MANAGER'S REPORT REGARDING CERTAIN SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 70-N-99) COUNCILMAN HAMILTON MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 71-81 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- City Engineer French requested that 71-A-8 and 71-A-9 be dismissed from the Agenda because the nuisances have been abated. There were no objections. 00- It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on 71-C-8 to determine whether failure to construct certain street improvements constitutes a public nuisance at 13082 Amar Road. Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to 71-C-8, Mayor McCaron declared the public hearing dosed. RESOLUTION NO. 71-82 FINDING AND DETERMINING THE EXISTENCE OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING THE SAME ABATED 71-C-8) City Engineer French stated that a time limit of 30 days should be established. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 71-82 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on 71-C-10 to determine whether failure to construct certain street improvements constitutes a public nuisance at 4338 Harlan Avenue. Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. Continued) March 17, 1971 Page 17 PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC NUISANCE 70-N-99 POSTINGS. MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED 70-N-99 RES. NO. 71-81 CONFIRM C.M. REPT. RE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT RES, NO. 71-81 ADOPTED 71-A-8. 71-A-9 DISMISSED NUISANCES ABATED PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC NUISANCE 71-C-8 POSTINGS. MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED 71-C-8 RES. NO. 71-82 ORDER ABATEMENT 71-C-8 30" DAYS TO ABATE RES. NO. 71-&2 ADOPTED PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC NUISANCE 71-C-10 POSTINGS. MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 03-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9976-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 03 17 CC MIN(ÌìÙ¯#pe1C 04 8^7 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to 71-C-10, Mayor McCaron declared the public hearing dosed. RESOLUTION NO. 71-83 FINDING AND DETERMINING THE EXISTENCE OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING THE SAME ABATED 71-C-10) City Engineer French stated that a time limit of 90 days should be established. COUNCILMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 71-83 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on 71-C-12 to determine whether failure to construct certain street improvements constitutes a public nuisance at 4816 Marion Avenue. Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. City Engineer French stated the improvement on this property consists of curb, gutter, sidewalk and drive approach. He stated that the owner requested a delay on the sidewalk, but agreed to put in the curb, gutter and drive approach. The City took a permit fAr guarantee of the sidewalk in 1969 and at that time the owner agreed to put in the other improvements. The owner has not yet done so. Mrs. Martinez, 14605 E. Olive, stated they were promised that the tree would be removed, but it has not yet been removed. City Engineer French explained the tree would be removed when the permit is taken out for the work. Mrs. Martinez stated she had misunderstood this, and thought the tree would be removed and then they should apply for the permit. She asked for 90 days to obtain the permit, stating that lack of work has caused them to have some financial problems. As there was no one else in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to 71-C-12, Mayor McCaron declared the public hearinr closed. RESOLUTION NO. 71-84 FINDING AND DETERMINING THE EXISTENCE OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING THE SAME ABATED 71-C-12) City Engineer French stated a time limit of 90 days should be established. COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 71-84 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN GREGORY SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- March 17, 1971 Page 18 PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED 71-C-10 RES. NO. 71-83 ORDER ABATEMENT 90" DAYS TO ABATE RES. NO. 71-83 ADOPTED PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC NUISANCE 71-C-12 POSTINGS, MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTECTS RESUME TESTIMONY MRS. MARTINEZ 14605 E. OLIVE PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED 71-C-12 RES. NO. 71-84 ORDER ABATEMENT 71-C-12 90" DAYS TO ABATE RES. NO. 71-84 ADOPTED BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 03-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9976-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 03 17 CC MIN(ÌìÙ¯#pe OCWS^S Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on 70-W-73, 5128 El ton Street, in regard to the coit of abating the public nuisance. Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on 70-W-81, 843 S. Frazier Street, in regard to the cost of abating the public nuisance. Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to 70-W-73 or 70-W-81, Mayor McCaron declared the public hearings dosed. RESOLUTION NO. 71-85 CONFIRMING THE CITY MANAGER'S REPORTS REGARDING CERTAIN SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 70-W-73) & 70-W-81) COUNCILMAN HAMILTON MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 71-85 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN GREGORY SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- It was the time and place fixed for a public hearirq on Z-334, proposed Intent of the Plannino Commission to reclassify from C-1 to R-1 zone certain real property located at 3915, 3909, 3918 and 3910 Harlan Avenue. Proper postings and mailinqs had been accomplished. There were no written protests. March 17, 1971 Page 19 PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC NUISANCE 70-W-73 POSTINGS. MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC NUISANCE 70-W-81 POSTINGS. MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS PUBLIC HEARINGS DECLARED CLOSED 70-W-73. 70-W-81 RES. NO. 71-85 CONF. C.M. REPTS. RE SPEC. ASSESSMENTS RES. NO. 71-85 ADOPTED PUBLIC HEARING RECLASSIFY FROM C-1 TO R-1 CASE Z-334 POSTINGS. MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS Planning Director Chivetta stated the properties have thereon single-family structures which do not conform to the present zone, which means the owners could not add to the structures in any way with the C-1 zoning. The Planning Commission felt that these properties should be redassified R-1 in keeping with the land use and the surrounding area. As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to Z-334, McCaron declared the public hearing closed. COUNCILMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO DRAW UP THE NECESSARY PAPERS EFFECT- ING THE ZONE RECLASSIFICATION FROM C-1 TO R-1. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- RESUME PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED Z-334 MOTION TO CONCUR WITH P. C. REC. AND DIRECT ATTORNEY TO DRAW PAPERS EFFECTING RECLASSIFICATION FROM C-1 TO R-1 BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 03-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9976-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 03 17 CC MIN(ÌìÙ¯#peRegular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on Z-335, proposed intent of the Planning Commission to reclassify from C-1 to a more restrictive zone certain real property located at 15401. 15403. 15405. 15407. 15411, 15415. 15421. 15427. and 15433 Olive Street and 4811 Azusa Canyon Road. Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. Planning Director Chivetta stated the majority of these properties are owned by Phil Gray Realty Company, and Mr. Gray is in full accord with the proposed zone change from C-1 to R-3. As there was no one in the audience desiring, to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to Z-335, McCaron declared the public hearing closed. Councilman Hamilton asked whether the structure Involved was to be reclassified. Mr. Chivetta replied that the recommendation of the Planninq Commission is to leave Parcel 12, 4811 Azusa Canyon Road, as C-1 / COUNCILMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO DRAW UP THE NECESSARY PAPERS EFFECTING THE ZONE RECLASSIFICATION FROM C-1 TO R-3. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on AZC-46. a proposed amendment to the Baldwin Park Municipal Code to determine regulations pertaining to a Precise Plan Development Ordinance. Initiated by the Baldwin Park Planning Commission. Proper publications and postings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. Planning Director Chivetta stated that on November 25. 1970 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider evidence and reports concerning the Precise Plan Review Ordinance; the Planning Commission recommends adoption of the Ordinance, which entails certain development standards and plans that would have to be submitted by the developers to the City for review prior to receiving a building permit. Mayor McCaron stated he felt It would be proper to outline some of me things this ordinance would require. Mr. Chivetta stated tne Precise Plan Review Ordinance would require all developers, where the cost of development exceeds $5,000, to submit plans to a Precise Plan Review Board made up of Planning Commission members. Upon receipt of a precise plan, the Review Board will review the development with the developer and either approve, conditionally approve, or deny. The applicant has the riqht to appeal the Board's decision to the City Council. There is a $25 filinq fee, and an appellate fee to the Council of $50. Planning Director Chivetta explained In detail various points covered In the Ordinance. March 17. 1971 Paqe 20 PUBLIC HEARING RECLASSIFY FROM C-1 TO MORE RES. ZONE Z-335 POSTINGS, MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS RESUME PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED Z-335 PARCEL 12. 4811 AZUSA CANYON ROAD TO REMAIN C-1 MOTION TO CONCUR WITH P. C. REC. AND DIRECT ATTORNEY TO DRAW PAPERS EFFECTING RECLASSIFICATION FROM C-1 TO R-3 PUBLIC HEARING PRECISE PLAN DEV. ORD. AZC-46 PUBLICATIONS. POSTINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS RESUME Continued) BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 03-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9976-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 03 17 CC MIN(ÌìÙ¯#pe000^850 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council March 17, 1971 Page 21 Councilman Hamilton commented that presently the major developments are reviewed by the staff, then the developer has the right to appeal their decision to the Planning Commission and the City Council. The suggested ordinance creates a separate Review Board to consider the develop- ment, plus a direct appeal to the Council. He stated that this. In hie opinion, creates one more level of authority, a little more red tape, and takes up more time for the contractor who comes 1n and wants to build. He stated he felt the staff should be the reviewing body, rather than having a committee or commission. TESTIMONY WAS GIVEN BY: Emmitt Waldo, 14238 E. Ramona Boulevard, asked what qualifications the Review Board would have as far as determining the requirements to be Imposed. He stated he felt the trained personnel on the staff could do a good Job In this respect, rather than having to go before a Review Board. He stated if he liked the design of a building and a particular color, and he was paying for it with his own money, he didn't feel a Review Board. whose members might possibly not be professionally trained In this particular area, should have the final say on whether or not he could have such a building constructed. Councilman Blewett pointed out that In the past there have been some structures built that were grossly unattractive, and had this ordinance been in effect, the owners might have been guided by the Board to have a more attractive building constructed. Mr. Waldo stated that if Council feels a Review Board is necessary, it should be composed of designers, engineers, landscape architects, etc., who would be qualified to judge. Councilman Gregory pointed out that usually a developer would have obtained the services of an architect or building designer before pro* senting plans to the City for review, so they would have been originated by someone fully qualified. Mr. Waldo Indicated he was not objecting to the ordinance, nor even the Review Board, but stated he felt the 3oard should be composed of people qualified to pass judgment. Councilman Hamilton stated he felt the Staff Is well qualified to be the reviewing board. Mayor McCaron stated there were a few Items he would like to mention. He questioned the requirement in Section 9464.1, Item 1), of putting fire hydrants on the property, and stated this required a large pipeline and costs quite a bit of money. He stated he felt the hydrants could be put on the public right-of-way. Mayor McCaron also asked the Planning Director to clarify the intention of Section 9464.1, Item 3) regarding land- scaping. Planning Director Chlvetta stated this related to screened off-street parking spaces, outdoor lunch areas, storage areas, loading docks, etc. where they can be viewed by adjacent property within 300 feet. Mayor McCaron stated this could cause problems because there were areas where there are mixed uses. Mr. Chivetta suggested that perhaps the 300 feet could be stricken and changed to read where It would materially impair the value of abutting or adjacent properties". Continued) TESTIMONY EMMITT WALDO 14238 E. RAMONA BLVD. BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 03-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9976-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 03 17 CC MIN(ÌìÙ¯#peWQWi Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council Regarding the $50 appellate filing fee. Mayor McCaron asked whether there would be a public hearing* Planning Director Chivetta stated there would be an informal hearing which would only become format if appealed to the Council. Councilman Hamilton asked whether there had been any difficulty regarding the present on-site plan where this has been handled by the staff. Planning Director Chivetta stated that the only difficulty we have had with the present standard is that we cannot conditionally apprdve the development, and stated there was some trouble with the Shop N Town Center and the Lucky Market on this particular basis. At the staff level, we have the right to approve, if it meets all the applicable codes of the City, or deny it; we cannot conditionally approve. Mayor McCaron inquired why, in Section 9464, it Is particularly indicated that plans may be referred to the proper official of the Los Angeles County Consolidated Fire Protection District. Planning Director Chivetta explained that most plans for development are submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for their recommendation, and went on to explain various requirements of the State Fire Marshal's Office. As there was no one else in the audience desiring to speak either In behalf of or in opposition to AZC-46, Mayor McCaron declared the public hearing dosed. Regarding Section 9464.1, Item 4), Design of Buildings and Structures, Mr. Chivetta replied, in answer to an inquiry by Mayor McCaron, that the Intent is not to specify these, but to see that they blend in with existing Improved and unimproved real property In the immediate vicinity. Regarding Section 9464.1, Item 3), Landscaping, Walls, Fences and Screening, Council concurred that the reference to 300 feet" be stricken and the words surrounding and adjacent properties to the central site" be Inserted. Mayor McCaron stated he would tike the Ordinance changed so that the review would be done by the staff, with an appeal to the Planning Commission and then to the Council if necessary, and have the Planning Commission act as a unit rather than creating another committee. Councilman Hamilton again questioned the necessity of the $25 filing fee. Some discussion was held regarding costs to the City and costs for a hearing, etc. Council members were in accord and directed the City Attorney to redraw the ordinance deleting the Initial $25 fee and retaining the $50 appellate fee; the procedure will be that the first level of review will be the Director of Planning; anyone dissatisfied may appeal his decision to the Planning Commission; anyone dissatisfied at that point may appeal to the City Council; the appeal to the Planning Commission will be in the form of an Informal hearing; the appeal to the Council will involve a $50 appellate fee; and the reference to 300 feet under Section 9464.1, Item 3) shall be deleted and shall read surrounding and adjacent properties to the central site". 00- March 17. 1971 Page 22 PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED AZC-46 DIRECT ORDINANCE TO BE REDRAWN AS AMENDED BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 03-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9976-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 03 17 CC MIN(ÌìÙ¯#pe00^852 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on AZC-47, Intent of the Baldwin Park Planning Commission to amend certain sections of the Municipal Code relating to filing fees and appellate fees for zone variances, conditional use permits, and zone changes. Proper publications and postings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. Planning Director Chivetta stated that since 1968 the Commission has studied the matter of filing fees for zone changes, conditional use permits, variances, and the possibility of initiating a minor variance procedures He stated that during that time the Commission hai reviewed the present fee schedule, the surrounding area and the cities and their fee schedules, and the cost to the community for processing the applications. It is the Commission's recommendation at this time that zone changes be increased from present filing fee of $100 to $200, with $10 for each additional lot, and an appellate fee of $100t variances and conditional use permits bef Increased from $100 to $125, with an appellate fee of $75; a minor variance procedure be initiated, with a fee of $25, and an appellate fee of $75. He further stated that the City is not even breaking even" on the processing fees, and 1t Is, therefore, the purpose of the Planning Commission's recommendation to allow the City to operate in the black. TESTIMONY WAS GIVEN BY: Robert Imp, 13803 Calais Avenue, stated he was 1n agreement with this recommendation, but would like to ask a few questions. He stated he had called the Planning Department and was told that the cost of a variance would depend on how deep you encroached on your limit. Planning Director Chivetta stated that minor variances were set up for side yards, rear yards, lot area, and fence heights only, to help out the single- family property owners, where the present cost of a variance might be as much or more than the proposed improvement. Mr. Imp asked what about a room addition, and Mr. Chivetta stated this would also apply on a room addition. Mr. Inf stated he had circulated a petition supporting this proposed change in the zoning code, and had presented it to the City Clerk. Mr. Imp also asked why the Code was changed from 15 feet to 20 feet on rear yard setbacks. Mr. Chivetta replied this was to provide more open space between structures As there was no one else in the audience who wished to speak either In behalf of or In opposition to AZC-47, McCaron declared the public hearing closed. Councilman King stated he would like to see the minor variance fee dropped to $5. Planning Director Chivetta stated the cost of publication is approximately $15. Councilman Hamilton asked how much it costs the City to process the variances and conditional use permits. Mr. Chivetta stated it costs the City $118.57. thus the recommended fee of $125. Councilman Hamilton stated he would like to see the appellate fee on a minor variance lowered from $75 to $50, because many of these are appealed, and he stated he felt $75 was too high. Continued) March 17, 1971 Page 23 PUBLIC HEARING FILING FEES AZC-47 PUBLICATIONS, POSTINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS RESUME TESTIMONY ROBERT IMP 13803 CALAIS AVE, PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED AZC-47 BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 03-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9976-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 03 17 CC MIN(ÌìÙ¯#peCC04853 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council COUNCILMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO AMEND THOSE SECTIONS OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO FILING FEES. WITH THE EXCEPTION THAT THE APPELLATE FEE FOR MINOR VARIANCES BE CHANGED FROM $75 TO $50, AND DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO DRAW UP THE NECESSARY PAPERS REFLECTING THE CHANGES. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on SP-20, Intent of the Baldwin Park Planning Commission to consider a proposed amendment to the Comprehensive General Plan, Community Design Study, circulation element, to delete a proposed future street. Dart Street, which would bisect the property located at 3235-3271 Frazier Street. Proper publications, postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. Planning Director Chivetta stated that Council recently conditionally approved reclasslflcation of this property from R-1 to R-3, contingent upon an parcels being com- bined into one parcel, and the applicant's obtaining a recommendation from the Planning Commission to delete the proposed future street. The Planning Commission Is recommending deletion of the proposed future street so that the applicant can record his parcel map and undertake his development. The recommendation is to delete the street only in the area as it affects the property, As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to SP-20, Mayor McCaron declared the public hearing closed. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO DELETE THE PROPOSED FUTURE STREET KNOWN AS DART STREET. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- At 11:00 p.m. Mayor McCaron declared a 10-minute recess. There were no objections. At 11:15 p.m. Council reconvened in regular session. Roll call. Same as 7:30 p.m. 00- Under Oral Communications, Mrs. Eugenia Igna stated she would like to address the Council regarding eminent domain. She stated that a11 three of her properties are improved, and it would take more than $15,000 to make the required improvements. She asked how long she will have to stay in Baldwin Park and operate her business after she makes the improvements. City Attorney Flandrick replied Continued) March 17. 1971 Page 24 MOTION TO CONCUR WI'm PLANNING COMM. TO AMEND MUN. CODE SECTIONS RELATING TO FILING FEES MADE AND CARRIED; APPELLATE FEE ON MINOR VAR. TO BE $50.00 PUBLIC HEARING SP-20 DELETE PROPOSED FUTURE STREET DART ST. PUBLICATIONS, POSTINGS & MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS RESUME PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED SP-20 MOTION TO CONCUR WITH P. C. REC. TO DELETE PROPOSED FUTURE ST. DART ST. 11:00 P.M. 10 MINUTE RECESS 11:15 P.M. RECONVENED ROLL CALL MRS. EUGENIA IGNA 12819 E. GARVEY BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 03-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9976-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 03 17 CC MIN(ÌìÙ¯#peRegular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council March 17, 1971 Page 25 that the answer is indefinitely. Mrs, Igna asked if she could have that in writing, and the City Attorney stated that if 1t was acceptable to the Council, he would be happy to write her a letter to that effect. Mrs. Igna stated she was doing the best she could, but asked whether she could have two or three months to accomplish the work, so she would be able to have enough money. She further stated she could not do part of the work because it was under the power line, but would comply with the rest of the requirements. Planning Director Chivetta explained that the work to be done under the power line was access paving to a parking area, and there was some question on a recreational area that is now located under the power line, as to whether this could be fenced off with a very low fence, at least high enough to contain the children and keep them from running out into the street. Mayor McCaron asked Mrs. Igna whether she had made any attempt to contact the Water and Power authorities. She stated she had called the Power Company and a gentleman told her she positively cannot enclose the area. She further stated she intends to put curb and gutter in on both streets. Mrs. Igna stated she felt there was need for a stop sign at Wescott and Torch Streets, and stated that if the City would install one, she would pay the expanse. Mr. Chivetta stated she should make a written request to this effect, which would be studied by the Traffic Committee and a report forwarded to the Council for a decision. City Engineer French stated the Traffic Committee had studied this situation previously, and their recommenda* tlon was that there not be a stop sign at this intersection, and the Council concurred. Mr. French commented that when the curb and gutter Is put in. It will help to alleviate the traffic problem. Regarding the property at 12793 Garvey, Mrs. Igna asked whether she had permission to put in blacktop and patios, and stated she had just bought three new trailers. Planning Director Chivetta stated that the Planning Commission approved x" number of mobile home spaces for each one of Mrs. Igna's three parks, and as long as she does not exceed that number of spaces, she can rearrange the trailers as she pleases, so long as they meet the City's regulations and the Mobile Home and Mobile Park Act of the State of California. He stated that Mrs. Igna would have to submit a plan to the Building Department showing how the trailers are going to be spotted on the lots and the distances from the trailers to the lot lines so it can be checked for compliance with the Mobile Home and Mobile Park Act. Mrs. Igna stated her son had prepared a design, and she intended to make a beautiful trailer park. Mayor McCaron suggested that she submit her designs to the Building Depart- ment. Councilman King stated the Planning Commission felt the area under the power line should be covered because the dust created quite a problem to the surrounding homes, Mrs. Igna stated she is not allowed to pave a 40 x 40 area around the tower, but if she were permitted, she would do so. Mrs. Igna asked for three months in which to have the Improve- ments completed. Councilman Hamilton asked whether the time limit on her conditional use permit had elapsed, and City Attorney Flandrick replied it had. Councilman Hamilton Continued) BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 03-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9976-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 03 17 CC MIN(ÌìÙ¯#peCC 0-1855 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council March 17, 1971 Page 26 suggested that Mrs. Igna be given thirty days to comply, and if she does not comply within that time, revoke her conditional use permit and begin court action. Councilman King stated he felt two weeks was sufficient time. Councilman Btewett stated he felt the work should be completed within the thirty days. Mrs. Igna stated she would be able to have the work started, but it would take her a month to provide the money. Mayor McCaron stated he would like the staff to prepare a report as to how long the work should take and when it should be completed, and give Mrs. Igna the chance to prove she is in earnest about making the improvements, and find out exactly what she intends to do. 00- Michael Dargus, 13260 E« Francisquito, made a request that the City Council consider eliminating the briefing or discussion session in the Conference Room. He stated he had made 42 telephone calls and conducted 58 personal interviews since the last meeting, and almost all of them were in accord with his request. He stated the people felt they could not enter the room during this session, or that there was not enough room for them. Mayor McCaron stated that the session in the Conference Room was an open meeting, but if the people felt this way. Council could hold the discussion session in the Council Chambers. Councilman Blewett stated he felt this would be a good idea, and Councilman Gregory concurred. Councilman Hamilton stated he would have no objection. It was agreed that Council would meet at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in open session prior to each regularly scheduled meeting. 00- Mrs. Amos Slater, 4814 N. Stancroft, requested to speak regarding the redevelopment agency. She stated that In talking to her neighbors and other people in the City, she found that most of the people don't understand what this ordinance Involves. She stated this is quite an Important ordinance which concerns everyone in Baldwin Park, and it should be brought to the people. She suggested that there be informative meetings in which the people could hear the pros and cons, and it should be taken to the people for a vote. She stated she did not feel this is something the members of the Council can decide for the citizens. Mayor McCaron stated that an educational program on the redevelopment program was being initiated, and asked Mr. Emmitt Waldo, who was present in the audience, whether the Chamber of Commerce had finalized preparations for a meeting. Mr. Waldo stated the meeting was set for 7:30 p.m. on April 1, 1971 at the Recreation Building at Morgan Park. He indicated it was not a protest meeting, but an Information meeting, where the citizens could hear representatives of other cities where such an agency was in effect, attorneys, and stated they would like to have City Manager Nordby and City Attorney Flandrick present to answer questions. Mr. Parenteau, Manager of the Chamber of Commerce, commented that City Manager Nordby would make himself available to any small groups who might wish him to answer questions, in an effort to enliqhten the citizens on the proposed redevelopment agency. Continued) MICHAEL DARGUS 13260 E. FRANCISQUITO MRS. AMOS SLATER 4814 N. STANCROFT BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 03-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9976-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 03 17 CC MIN(ÌìÙ¯#pe C004856 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council March 17, 1971 Page 27 Mrs. Slater asked how the citizens were being notified of the Chamber's information meeting. Mr. Parenteau stated that there would be a series of articles in the newspapers, and every person who holds a business license in the City and every service organization would receive a flyer explaining what the meeting is about. Mayor McCaron stated the City Council was concerned that the public be Informed as completely as possible on the proposed redevelopment agency* 00- City Clerk Balkus presented a claim from S. C. Rains, in the amount of $22.50, for damage to a gas tank. The damage allegedly occurred'in an area where sewer construction is under way. COUNCILMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT THE CLAIM BE DENIED AND REFERRED TO THE INSURANCE CARRIER AND THE CONTRACTOR. G. W. SHORE, COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. CLAIM S. C. RAINS CLAIM DENIED AND REFERRED TO INS. CARRIER AND CONTRACTOR 00- City Clerk Balkus presented Temporary Use Permits, requested by the Chamber of Commerce, for sales pro- motions from March through December 1971, Including sidewalk sales. COUNCILMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT THE TEMPORARY USE PERMITS FROM MARCH THROUGH DECEMBER 1971 BE APPROVED AND THAT FEES BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- City Manager Nordby stated he was preparing a comprehen- sive report on various subjects to present to the Council. He stated also that he was in the process of preparing the 1971-72 budget. Mr. Nordby commented that several of the Council menfcers had attended an examination of the Cable T.V. facilities in Los Angeles last night. He stated that the City has received four or five proposals from various companies around the country. Mr. Nordby suggested that one or two members of the Council be appointed to work with him as an ad hoc committee to study this. Discussion followed. Councilman Gregory requested that, in addition to the formation of an ad hoc comnittee. all the Council members receive copies of any applications and/or other related materials. Councilman King and Councilman Blewett volunteered to serve with City Manager Nordby as an ad hoc committee to study the matter. 00- T.U.P. CHAMBER OF COMMENCE SALES PROMOTIONS MARCH THROUGH DECEMBER 1971 T.U.P.'S APPROVED C. M. PREPARING REPORT TO COUNCIL AND 1971-72 BUDGET COUNCIL MEMBERS ATTEND CABLE T.V. FACILITIES IN L.A. DISCUSSION CMN. BLEWETT AND KING TO SERVE WITH C.M. AS AD HOC COMMITTEE BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 03-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9976-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 03 17 CC MIN(ÌìÙ¯#peGC0185^ Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council City Engineer French presented a report of work completed under the Short Form 1911 Act on 70-S-44, east side of Puente Avenue between BadlHo Street and Cleary Drive for sidewalk and drive approach; 70-.S-45, east side of Monterey Avenue between Baldwin Park Boulevard and Frazler Street for curb, gutter, sidewalk and drive approach; 70-S-50. southwest side of Central Avenue between Depot Avenue and Vineland Avenue for sidewalk and drive approach; 70-S-54, southwest side of Monterey Avenue between Frazler Street and Baldwin Park Boulevard for curb and gutter; 70-S-56, west side of Jeremie Street between Vineland Avenue and Depot Avenue for curb, gutter, sidewalk and drive approach; and 70-S-57, southeast side of Vineland Avenue between Central Avenue and Pacific Avenue for curb, gutter, sidewalk and drive approach. RESOLUTION NO. 71-76 SETTING A HEARING DATE FOR ANY PROTESTS OR OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORTS OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS 70-S-44. 45. 50. 54, 56 AND 57) COUNCILMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 71-76 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- City Engineer French requested acceptance of sewer construc- tion work on Garvey Avenue west of Big Datton Avenue, and stated the work has been completed in compliance with plans and specifications. The City Engineer recommended that Council accept the work of G. W. Shore Construction Company, and instruct the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion. March 17, 1971 Page 28 REPORT OF WORK 1911 ACT SHORT FORM 70-S-44 S&DA) 70-S-45 CGS&DA) 70-S-50 70-S-54 70-S-56 70-S-57 S&DA) C&G) CGS&DA) CGS&DA) RES. NQ. 71-76 SET HEARING DATE 70-S-44. 45. 50, 54. 56 AND 57) P. H. APRIL 21. 1971 RES. NO. 71-76 ADOPTED ACCEPT SEWER CONST. WORK ON GARVEY W/OF BIG DALTON AND INSL C.E. TO FILE NOTICE OF COMPLETION COUNCILMAN HAMILTON MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ACCEPT THE SEWER CONSTRUCTION WORK ON GARVEY AVENUE AND INSTRUCT THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- City Engineer French reviewed the Traffic Committee Report dated March 17. 1971. RESOLUTION NO. 71-86 IMPOSING CERTAIN VEHICULAR TRAFFIC REGULATIONS NO PARKING AREAS) COUNCILMAN BLEWETT MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 71-86 BE ADOPTED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN GREGORY SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- City Engineer French reviewed his report on city-owned property at Francisqulto Avenue and Frazler Street, and stated the matter was before Council to make a determination as to what the disposition of this property should be. He stated the property is approximately 5,500 square feet, and could be developed with a single-family residence. Continued) MOTION TO ACCEPT SEWER CONSTRUCTION WORK MADE AND CARRIED. C.E. TO FILE NOT. OF COMP. TRAFFIC COMMITTEE REPORT RES. NO. 71-86 IMPOSE VEHIC. TRAFFIC REGS NO PARKING ARE^ RES. NO. 71-86 ADOPTED CITY-OWNED PROPERTY AT FRANCISQUITO AND FRAZIER BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 03-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9976-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 03 17 CC MIN(ÌìÙ¯#pe000-755:8 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council March 17. 1971 Page 29 Councilman Blewett suggested that the City Engineer obtain an appraisal of the worth of the property. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT MOVED THAT COUNCIL INSTRUCT THE CITY ENGINEER TO OBTAIN ESTIMATES OF THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY AND TRY TO NEGOTIATE FOR SALE WITH THE ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS, AND IN THE EVENT THAT FAILS. PUT THE PROPERTY OUT FOR PUBLIC BID. COUNCILMAN GREGORY SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. oo- City Engineer French stated that previous Council action had instructed him to go to the State Division of Highways and the Bureau of Public Roads for approval of Robert Crommelin & Associates as consultant on the Topics Program. He stated this had been done, and the Bureau requires a resolution and authorization for the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign the agreement. RESOLUTION NO. 71-87 AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF AN APPLICATION WITH THE CALIFORNIA DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS FOR AN AREA-WIDE TOPICS PLAN AND STUDY. COUNCILMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 71-87 BE ADOPTED AND FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. AND THAT THE MAYOR AND THE CITY CLERK BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN THE APPROPRIATE AGREEMENTS. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- RESOLUTION NO. 71-88 FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN RIGHTS-OF-WAY FOR PUBLIC STREET AND ALL OSES APPURTENANT THERETO WALNUT STREET) COUNCILMAN BLEWETT MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 71-88 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- Planning Director Chivetta reviewed his report regarding Annexation No. 21. He posted a map on the wall and pointed out the area Included in the proposed annexation. He stated there was approximately $264,000 worth of assessed valuation in the area—land and improvements—and stated that at the present tax rate, if we are successful with the annexation, this would bring in $3.500 In revenue. He stated there was also a construction equipment establishment In the area, which would bring In a substantial amount of sales tax. Mr. Chivetta stated a request for waiver had been presented to Los Angeles County Flood Control because the annexation would box in" a certain area between the City of Baldwin Park and the Flood Control In the unincorporated area, creating a County Island. The hearing will be held on April 28, and If the waiver is approved, the next step will be for the Council to have a public hearing for the property owners. MOTION TO INSTRUCT C. E. TO OBTAIN ESTIMATES OF VALUE AND NEGOTIATE WITH ADJOINING OWNERS OR'PUT OUT FOR PUBLIC BID MADE AND CARRIED ROBERT CROMMELIN AND ASSOCIATES CONSULTANT ON TOPICS PROGRAM RES. NO. 71-87 AUTHORIZING FILING OF APPLICATION WITH CAL. DIV. OF HIGHWAYS FOR AREA-WIDE TOPICS PLAN AND STUDY RES. 71-87 ADOPTED MAYOR AND CITY CLERK AUT^RIZED TO SIGN APPROPRIATE AGREE-. MENTS RES. NO. 71-88 ACQUIRE CERTAIN RIGHTS- OF-WAY WALNUT ST.) RES. NO. 71-88 ADOPTED ANNEXATION NO. 21 INFORMATION PRESENTED BY PLANNING DIRECTOR 00- BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 03-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9976-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 03 17 CC MIN(ÌìÙ¯ #peCCC4859 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council Blanning Director Chivetta presented a request from the Planning Commission that the Council initiate an urgency ordinance establishing a moratorium on all house relocations within the City and into the City. The Commission would like additional time to study the present regulations pertaining to reldcations, with the main premise to upgrade them or to make other recommendations. He stated the situation with house relocations has become serious in the past few months, and Council has been faced many times in the past with problems in getting the developer to comply with the Code. Councilman Gregory stated she is in agreement that the problem of house relocation needs study, and she stated she felt consideration should be given to disallowing move-ins into the City. COUNCILMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CONC(jR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE STAFF AND PLANNING COMMISSION TO IMPOSE A MORATORIUM ON HOUSE RELOCATIONS AND INSTRUCT THE STAFF TO PREPARE THE NECESSARY PAPERS FOR PRESENTATION AT THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- City Clerk Balkus read by title: March 17. 1971 Page 3& REQUEST FOR MORATORIUM ON HOUSE RELOCATIONS MOTION TO ALLOW IMPOSITlbN OF MORATORIUM ON HOUSE RELOCATIONS AND INSTRUCT STAFF TO PREPARE PAPERS ORDINANCE NO. 587 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF SAID CITY AND REZONING CERTAIN HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM ZONE C-1 TO ZONE C-2 ZONE CASE NO. Z-333 13247 GARVEY) COUNCILMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT FURTHER READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 587 BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was set ordered. COUNCILMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 587 BE INTRODUCED. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- Councilman King suggested that the Council adjourn to another meeting for discussion on various subjects which need consideration, such as a new civic center. Councilman Btewett stated he would also like to discuss the possibility of amending the meeting schedule to allow for unusually full agendas. Discussion followed regarding ways in which the agenda might be rescheduled to alleviate the long periods of waiting which some people must sit through before their testimony can be heard. 00- Councilman Gregory stated she had received a report regarding Civil Defense activities during the recent earthquake, and requested that City Manager Nordby forward to the Civil Defense Unit a letter of commendation on their fine performance during this disaster, with copies to the higher levels of authority in Civil Defense, both state and federal. 00- ORD. 587 AMEND ZONING MAP Z-333 13247 GARVEY FURTHER READING WAIVED ORD. NO. 587 ORD. NO. 587 INTRODUCED COUNCILMAN KING SUGGESTED ADJOURNED MEETING FOR DISCUSSION DISCUSSION RE AGENDA SCHEDULING CIVIL DEFENSE COMMENDED FOR WORK DURING EARTHQUAKE DISASTER BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 03-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9976-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 03 17 CC MIN(ÌìÙ¯!#pe0004860 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council AT 12:23 A.M. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADJOURN TO TUESDAY. MARCH 23. 1971 AT 7:00 P.M. COUNCILMAN GREGORY SECONDED* There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- March 17, 1971 Paqe 31 ADJOURN 12:23 A.M. TO TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 1971 7:00 P.M. y^^^^ ELMA L. BALKffS: CITY CLERK A APPROVED: 1971 Date of Distribution to City Council:, Date of Distribution to Departments: 3(\ J.^ 1971 1971 BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 03-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9976-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 03 17 CC MIN(ÌìÙ¯"#peAFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE OF ADJOURNMENT OF" MEETING STATE OF CA 13 FORMS A COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) S3: CITY OF BALDWIN PARK Th'ELMA Lo 3ALKU3, being first duly sworn, says and deposes: that S am the duSy chosen, qualified and acting City Clerk of the City Counct! of the City of 5A!dwm Park, that at a Regular Meeting of the Ci t/ Council of the City of Baldwin Park held March 17______*. 1971, said meeting was ordered adj'ourned t® the time and p5ace specified in the Notice of the Adjournment ATTACHED HERETOs that on l8_____, 19^ at the hour of 10:00 a.m., I posted a copy of said Notice at a conspicuous place on or near the door of the place at which said meeting of arch 17 19 71 t was heidc THELMA Lo BALKUS. CITY CLERK Subscribed and sworn to before me this r7 day of /^^y I^U» 19 7/ Notary Public in and for said County and State taS"'-.-- A- nri-i S^ THFLMA s- DUNCAN 1^ NOTAftv PUBLlC-CALfFORNfA %^y/ f-GS ANGa.CS COUNTY G^'"^ Mv Commission Expires reb. 25,1975 \ 14403 E. Pacific Ave., Bdidwin Park. Calif. 91706 BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 03-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9976-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 03 17 CC MIN(ÌìÙ¯##peREGULAR MEETING OF THE BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL MARCH 17. 1971 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER) 14403 East Pacific Avenue 7:30 P.M. In accordance with Section 2703 of the Municipal Code the City Council met in open meeting at 7:00 p.m. in the Conference Room for an informal session with the Staff to be informed on regular agenda items. The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park met in regular session at the above place at 7:30 p.m. Councilman Gregory led the salute to the flag. FLAG SALUTE Roll Call: Present: COUNCILMEN BLEWETT, GREGORY ROLL CALL HAMILTON, KING, AND MAYOR MC CARON Also Present: CITY MANAGER NORDBY, CITY ATTORNEY FLANDRICK. CITY ENGINEER FRENCH, PLANNING DIRECTOR CHIVETTA, FINANCE DIRECTOR DUNCAN. CHIEF OF POLICE ADAMS, CITY TREASURER CODLING, CITY CLERK BALKUS 00- AT 12:23 A.M. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT MOVED THAT THE CITY ADJOURN 12:23 A.M. COUNCIL ADJOURN TO TUESDAY. MARCH 23, 1971 at 7:00 P.M. TO TUESDAY. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF THE CITY HALL. COUNCILMAN MARCH 23. 1971 GREGORY SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion 7:00 P.M. carried and was so ordered. 00- s^^L^^^dL^ IHLLHAL. BALKUi;, CIIV CLERK DATE: MARCH 18. 1971 TIME: 10:00 A.M. BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 03-U02 17-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9976-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06