Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1971 10 20 CC MIN1971 10 20 CC MIN(ÌìØ,peINDEX OCTOBER 20, 1971 Page Councilman Hamilton's Absence Excused 1 Minutes 9/15/71 Approved 1 Treasurer's Report 9/30/71 Received and Filed 1 Res. No. 71-243 Claims & Demands Adopted 1 Mr. Blair Hotman, Chairman of the C.R.A.S.C., presented recommendations of the Community Redevelopment Agency Study Committee 1 & 2 Public Hearing ZV-248 2 Testimony Andrew Perez 3 ZV-248 Granted Lot Split Approved Two-Story Development on each Parcel 4 Public Hearing ZV-252 4 Written Protest Hazel M. Richardson 4 Testimony George Putnam 4, 5 & 6 ZV-252 Approved Subject to Conditions 7 Public Hearing 71-S-15. 71-S-23 7 71-S-30 and 71-S-31 8 Testimony 71-S-31 Perry Eiszele Continued to November 3, 1971 8 71-S-30 Anthony Perez 71-S-30 Continued to November 3. 1971 9 Res. No. 71-241 71-S-15 & 23) Adopted 9 Res. No. 71-244 71-N-54) Adopted 9 Res. No. 71-245 71-N-55) Adopted 10 71-N-57 10 Res. No. 71-246 71-N-57) Adopted Res. No. 71-247 71-N-58) Adopted Z-349 R-1 to R-3 11 11 11 Concur with Planning Commission Recommendation Attorney to Prepare Ordinance Z-349) 12 AZC-52 Household Pets 12 Referred to Planning Commission for Further Study 13 AZC-53 2-Ft. Overhang in Side Yard Setback 13 AZC-53 Approved 14 Request of Mr. and Mrs. Welsh, under Oral Communications, dropped 14 RESOLUTION NO. 7T-248 GRANTING A ZONE VARIANCE APPLICANT: QUALITY Adopted BILT CONSTRUCTION; CASE NO. ZV-248; LOCATION: 4719 MERGED) 14 RESOLUTION NO. 71-249 APPROVING A ZONE VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT GARAGES Adopted WITHOUT DOORS. LOCATION: 12726-12732 TORCH STREET; APPLICANT: SHAPELL GOVERNMENT HOUSING; CASE NO.: ZV-252) 14 Temporary Use Permit for Lucky Baldwin Little League Swap Meet Approved 15 Union Oil Company Request for refund of a filing fee Granted 15 Work-Study Agreement with Baldwin Park Unified School District September 1, 1971 through June 30, 1972) Approved 15 Res. No. 71-242 71-S-16, 27. 28 & 29) Adopted 15 Traffic Committee Report re 1) Parking Restriction Enforcement, 2) Review of Parking Restriction on Maine Avenue, 3) Review of Traffic Control around Central School and 4) Request for 4-way stop at Vinetand Avenue and Garvey Avenue 16 Res. No. 71-250 IMPOSING CERTAIN VEHICULAR TRAFFIC REGULATIONS-Adopted 17 Report re Replacement of Damaged Curb and Gutter City Engineer 17 BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 10-U02 20-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9951-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 10 20 CC MIN(ÌìØ,peINDEX October 20, 1971 Page 2 Page City Attorney to Prepare Ordinance per City Engineer's Recommendation re Replacement of Damaged Curb and Gutter) and Present to Council at Next Regular Meeting 18 At R, Grc^y, Covina, Awarded Contract for Construction of Restroom at Central Park West and a Mower Shed at Morgan Park 18 Final Acceptance Heater Remix and Overlay Olive Street from Center to Bleecker Engineer to File Notice of Completion 18 Final Acceptance Asphalt Removal and Street Paving Big Dalton from Merced Southwesterly Engineer to File Notice of Completion 18 Planning Director Presented a Report re the Reconnaissance Study an over-all stuc(y of the City) 19 Staff to Design Reconnaissance Stucly and Present It to the Planning Commission and City Council 20 Front Yard Storage in R-1 Zones Ketley Property 4728 Landis) Defer Enforcement Pending Further Study 20 ORDINANCE NO. 611 AMENDING CERTAIN OF THE CITY'S ZONING REGULATIONS Introduced CASE NUMBERS: AZC-49 AND AZC-51) 21 Complaints re Noise of Vehicles Crossing Railroad Tracks City Engineer to Contact Railroad 21 Adjourned to Executive Session 10:33 p.m. 21 Reconvened in Regular Session 11:05 p.m. 21 Adjourned to 5:00 p.m. on October 26, 1971 21 BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 10-U02 20-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9951-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 10 20 CC MIN(ÌìØ,peCC05387 REGULAR MEETING OF THE BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS) 14403 East Pacific Avenue The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park met in regular session at the above place at 7:30 P.M. Councilman McCaron led the salute to the flag. Present: COUNCILMEN BLEWETT, KING. MC CARON AND MAYOR GREGORY Roll Call: Absent: COUNCILMAN HAMILTON OCTOBER 20, 1971 7:30 P.M. FLAG SALUTE ROLL CALL Also Present: ACTING CITY MANAGER/CITY CLERK BALKUS, CITY ATTORNEY FLANDRICK, CITY ENGINEER FRENCH, PLANNING DIRECTOR GORDON, FINANCE DIRECTOR DUNCAN, CHIEF OF POLICE ADAMS Absent: CITY TREASURER CODLING 00- COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT COUNCILMAN HAMILTON'S ABSENCE BE EXCUSED. COUNCILMAN MC CARON SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- COUNCILMAN BLEWETT MOVED THAT THE MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 15. 1971 BE APPROVED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT THE CITY TREASURER'S REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 30. 1971 BE RECEIVED AND FILED. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- RESOLUTION NO. 71-243 ALLOWING CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK COUNCILMAN BLEWETT MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 71-243 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. Roll call. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- Mayor Gregory stated that Mr. Blair Holman. who had requested to speak under Oral Communications, also had another commitment for this evening, and if the Council were in agreement, Mr. Holman would address them at this time. There were no objections. Mr. Btair Holman, Chairman of the Community Redevelopment Agency Study Committee, addressed the Council. He stated that, on behalf of the Committee, he would like to thank the Council for the opportunity of having served on the Committee. Continued) CMN. HAMILTON'S ABSENCE EXCUSED MINUTES OF 9/15/71 APPROVED TREASURER'S REPORT OF 9/30/71 RECEIVED & FILED RES. NO. 71-243 CLAIMS & DEMANDS 3397 3491 PAYROLL PERIOD 9/16/71 9/30/71 RES. NO. 71-243 ADOPTED MR. BLAIR HOLMAN CHAIRMAN C.R.A. STUDY COMM. BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 10-U02 20-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9951-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 10 20 CC MIN(ÌìØ,peC0^«9 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council Mr. Holman presented two motions which had been made and carried at the last meeting of the Committee on October 7, 1971, as follows: THAT THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY STUDY COMMITTEE RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT A RECONNAISSANCE STUDY BE MADE TO DETERMINE IF THERE ARE ANY AREAS IN THE CITY THAT ARE SUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT." THAT THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY StUDY COMMITTEE BECOME INACTIVE UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE RECONNAISSANCE STUDY IS MADE. AT TKAT TIME THE COMMITTEE DESIRES TO BE REACTIVATED IF THE CITY COUNCIL SO CONCURS." On behalf of the Council, Councilman Blewett expressed his appreciation to Mr. Holman and the members of the Committee for the time and effort expended on t(ie study of C.R.A. He stated he agreed with the Committee's preliminary recommendation that a feasibility study be made. Mayor Gregory also commended the Committee for their efforts on behalf of the community, and indicated that the Conmittee would not be disbanded, but would likely be called on for further studies. In answer to Councilman McCaron's question, Mr. Holman stated that the Committee would like an economic stuc(y made to determine what areas of the City would be suitable for development, if any; after reviewing the recommendation of the persons making the study, the Committee would then present a formal recommendation as to whether the matter should be pursued, or whether there was some other approach which should be taken to solve the redevelopment situation. 00- City Clerk Balkus administered the oath to those in the audience desiring to be heard during the meeting. 00- 7:30 P.M. having arrived, it was the time and place set for a public hearing on an appeal of ZV-248, application for a Zone Variance to vary with Section 9552, subsections 1 and 2 a and b of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code. to create two parcels with less than the required lot area 6,000 square feet) and lot frontage 60 feet for interior lots and 65 feet for corner lots) in the R-l single family residential) Zone at 4719 Merced Avenue. Applicant: Quality Bilt Construction. Continued from 10/6/71) Proper publication, postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. Planning Director Gordon stated the subject property is at the southwest corner of Bell brook and Merced. The proposal by the applicant is to create one lot 52x100 5,200 sq. ft.) and a second lot 50x100 5,000 sq. ft.) The Planning Commission denied the application because they felt it varied too much from the standards. Continued) October 20, 1971 Page 2 MOTIONS MADE BY STUDY COMMITTEE RECONNAISSANCE STUDY RECOMMENDED C.R.A. STUDY COMM. TO BE INACTIVE UNTIL RECON. STUDY COMPLETED OATH PUBLIC HEARING ZV-248 PUBLICATION. POSTINGS & MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS RESUME BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 10-U02 20-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9951-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 10 20 CC MIN(ÌìØ,peCCCW83 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council October 20, 1971 Page 3 Mr. Gordon pointed out that the Code required a 6,000 sq. ft. lot, and a 60 ft. width for an interior lot and 65 ft. for a corner lot. TESTIMONY WAS GIVEN BY: Andrew Perez, 3645 E. Third Street, Los Angeles, representing Quality-Bilt Construction, reviewed their proposal, stating that the lots they are proposing would be almost identical to the general size and shape of the existing lots in the surrounding area. He stated it would be impossible to increase the size of the lots, in that they were unable to purchase any of the adjoining property; therefore, instead of a single-family, one-story dwelling, he proposed a two-story dwelling, thereby creating more area on the lot itself. Councilman King asked how much this would raise the price of the home. Mr. Perez stated that originally they had planned to sell the single-family home for $24,000, and they would leave it at the same market value. He stated the square^ footage would comply with the City's requirements. He f'ilt the homes would enhance the area, and be a definite asset. In answer to Councilman McCaron's question, Mr. Perez clarified that they were stilt asking for two lots, and were proposing two-story dwellings for both lots, in ord6r to create more open area on the lots. Councilman McCaron asked Planning Director Gordon whether there was any objection to this proposed construction; Mr. Gordon indicated there was none, stating that two stories were allowable in any R-1 zone. Planning Director Gordon distributed to the Council plot plans of the proposed development of the property, and a map showing the sizes of the existing lots in the area. Bob Izelt, 4108 Walnut, stated he was instrumental in splitting this property several years ago, and this property was left so it could be split into two lots at a later time, because it would have conformed to the requirements at that time. He stated it would be unreasonable for an owner to be required to have a 100x100 lot when alt the others in the area are 50x100. He felt that dollar-wise, this development would bring at least 55,000 to $60,000 into the City the first year. As there was no one else in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to ZV-248, Mayor Gregory declared the public hearing closed. Councilman King stated he felt the applicant had complied with a11 the requirements, had tried to increase the lot area by making the homes two-story, and he, personalty, felt this would be a good development. Councilman Blewett stated that he had talked with the neighbors in the area, and they were in agreement that the applicant should be allowed to build on his lots as had been built on their lots. He did not feel a person should be limited to one 10,000 ft. lot when he could have two, and when everything in the neighborhood is similar to the size the two lots would be. Councilman Blewett felt that sometimes, of necessity, the standards must be flexible. Continued) TESTIMONY ANDREW PEREZ 3645 E. THIRD LOS ANGELES REP. QUALITY-BILT CONSTRUCTION DISCUSSION PLOT PLANS DISTRIBUTED PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED ZV-248 BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 10-U02 20-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9951-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 10 20 CC MIN(ÌìØ,peCCC^no Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council October 20, 1971 Page 4 Councilman King felt that any lot that is substandard or oversized that was in existence before the Ordinance went into effect should be considered by the Council. He felt- that in this case, variance with the standards was justified. COUNCILMAN MC CARON MOVED THAT ZONE VARIANCE NO. 248 BE GRANTED TO ALLOW THE CREATION OF TWO PARCELS AT 4719 MERGED AVENUE. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. Discussion followed as to whether structures to be con- structed on the lots should be required to be two-story. Councilman McCaron felt the parcels could be properly developed with either one- or two-story structures. Councilman Blewett and Councilman King felt two-story structures should be a condition of the variance. COUNCILMAN MC CARON AMENDED THE MOTION TO INCLUDE THE DEVELOPMENT OF TWO-STORY STRUCTURES ON EACH PARCEL. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. Roll call. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on an appeal of ZV-252, application for a Variance to Section 9571.2(h) of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code to construct garages without doors at 12726-12732 Torch Street Syracuse Park Apartments). Applicant: Shapetl Government Housing. Continued from 10/6/71) Proper publication, postings and mailings had been accomplished. A written protest had been received from Hazel M. Richardson, 12729 E. Torch Street, indicating she felt granting this variance would be an invitation to pilfering, thievery, dissension, and possible arson. She stated that tockable garage doors, as well as partitions, should be provided. Copy of tetter in official files) Planning Director Gordon stated that the 36-unit apartments were approximately a month away from com- pletion. The Planning Commission denied the request for a variance because they felt garage doors provided better esthetics and better security for the tenants. TESTIMONY WAS GIVEN BY: George Putnam, 11152 Wallingsford Road, Los Alamitos, stated he represented the applicant, Shappel Government Housing. He stated that one of the concerns had been that lack of garage doors would cause storage in the carports and parking on the streets. He indicated that 74 parking spaces would be provided, which would mean 2 for each unit in the development. He presented a photograph of an apartment complex to the east of the proposed development which showed on-street parking, etc. and he comnented that this complex had one parking space per unit and the parking lot was quite a distance from the units. He pointed out that the carport area would be well lighted; there would be interior lighting, and exterior illumination along the back of the building. Also, the Continued) ZV-248 GRANTED LOT SPLIT APPROVED MOTION AMENDED TO INCLUDE CONDITION OF 2-STORY DEVELOPMENT ON EACH PARCEL PUBLIC HEARING ZV-252 SHAPPEL GOVERNMENT HOUSING PUBLICATION. POSTINGS & MAILINGS WRITTEN PROTEST HAZEL M. RICHARDSON 12729 E. TORCH ST. RESUME TESTIMONY GEORGE PUTNAM 11152 WALLINGSFORD R[ LOS ALAMITOS REP. SHAPPEL GOVERN. HOUSING BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 10-U02 20-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9951-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 10 20 CC MIN(ÌìØ,peoosrn Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council design of the units is such that the apartments look down onto the carport area; this, combined with the lighting, would eliminate most of the policing problem. He further pointed out that there would be two garage doors and four parking spaces per unit; for this reason, he felt there would be very Uttle security, in that there could be no locks if four different people were using the spaces. If there were any illegal activity taking place inside the garages, the doors would only provide a shield. Mr. Putnam indicated that the apartments would be landscaped, and they would be willing, as a condition, to provide additional landscaping around the garage entry off of Torch, along with wall board in the first garage so the studs could not be seen from the street. He presented photographs of various apartment complexes to point out that a carport area could be attractive and that if it were controlled, storage would not take place. He stated that adequate storage space was pro- vided in the units. Discussion followed regarding partitions. Mr. Putnam Indicated that without doors there would be no need for partitions, and he felt that storage would not take place as readily if there were no doors or partitions. Councilman McCaron asked whether any of the garages had apartments over them. Mr. Putnam stated that the ones in the interior of the property did. In answer to Councilman McCaron's question, Mr. Putnam stated that the permit had been taken^out with the intention of installing garage doors; however, after reviewing problems in other cities and'studies indicating that doors cause additional policing problems, they decided the best course would be to eliminate the doors. Councilman McCaron felt it would be advisable to have a report from the Police Department indicating whether there had been problems in the City, Councilman King felt the matter should be checked with the Police Department; however, he felt that the doors would most likely never be closed anyway. He stated this problem should be referred to the Planning Commission for study so there would not be a repetition; however, in this particular case, he felt very little would be accom- plished by further study. Mayor Gregory asked Chief Adams for his feelings on the policing aspect. Chief Adams stated he felt garage doors did provide security for someone who might want to totally strip an automobile; however, in the open carport areas, the Department was plagued with calls concerning minor, malicious acts. Councilman King felt that, rather than the City eliminating the requirement for garage doors, the developer should provide partitions and tockable doors, to safeguard the people living in the apartments. Mr. Putnam stated that if this had been a Code requirement, they would have done it; however, they had secured a loan for a certain amount, the electrical work had been done. etc., and at this point, the cost to do this would be exorbitant. C"ntinued) October 26. 1971 Page 5 BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 10-U02 20-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9951-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 10 20 CC MIN(ÌìØ,pe 05?;^ Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council October 20, 1971 Page 6 Mr. Putnam briefly reviewed the method of financing this type of project under the FHA programs, stating that the developer's profit is determined in the beginning, and if the doors were required, it would hurt them tonsiderably. Mayor Gregory pointed out that the original plan depicted four-car garages with one partition, and the loan had been obtained on this plan. Mr. Putnam stated this was correct. Discussion followed regarding Building Code requirements for fire walls when living quarters were above garages. Mr. Gordon stated that a 2-hour fire wall was required, and these were usually concrete. Discussion followed. r Councilman Blewett felt the Council should make a decision on this case this evening, rather than hold it over for study. Councilman King agreed; however, he recommended that the Planning Commission study the matter so would be no future problems along this line. Discussion followed regarding parking provisions. Mr. Gordon indicated that the Code required two spaces per unit, plus one-fourth space for visitor parking; in this case the visitor parking was uncovered, and was scattered throughout the different building areas. As there was no one else in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to ZV-252, Mayor Gregory declared the public hearing closed. Councilman McCaron felt the garages beneath living quarters should have garage doors, in that this would be additional protection against fire. He felt that in the case of the others, a condition should be set that no storage would be allowed, other than an automobile. Councilman King felt Councilman McCaron had made a valid point; however, he felt that partitions should be required where the doors were required; otherwise, the purpose would be defeated. Councilman Blewett felt that since the applicant had offered to meet the requirements for doors when he applied for the permit, the requirement should stand. He also felt that the Planning Commission should look into any future development, and possibly consider amending the Code to provide adequately for this type of problem, Councilman McCaron suggested that the garages not beneath living quarters could be permitted without doors; however. he felt those under the living quarters should have doors and partitions required. Discussion followed regarding fire hazards and the possibility of fire spreading through garages and into living quarters above them. COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ZV-252 BE REOPENED, SINCE NO ONE HAD LEFT THE ROOM. MAYOR GREGORY SECONDED, There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. Further discussion followed regarding fire ratings and fire protection for the tenants. Continued) PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED ZV-252 PUBLIC HEARING REOPENED ZV-252 BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 10-U02 20-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9951-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 10 20 CC MIN(ÌìØ, pecro^^n Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council October 20, 1971 Page 7 City Engineer French clarified some of the questions concerning protection offered by various types of walls, construction standards, fire ratings, etc. Councilman King felt that under the apartments, at least a one-hour, solid fire wall should be required, along with doors; the doors on the garages not beneath living quarters could be deleted. Mr. Putnam indicated they would be witting to put one-hour fire watts in the garages beneath the living quarters. He stated there were six garages beneath apartments, which would make a total of 24 spaces. Mr. Gordon clarified that it was Council's desire that for the garages underneath the apartments, there should be a one-hour fire watt between every two spaces; also, doors should be installed on the garages beneath the apartments. He indicated that this would also be his recommendation. As there was no further testimony. Mayor Gregory declared the public hearing closed. COUNCILMAN MC CARON MOVED THAT DOORS BE REQUIRED ON ALL GARAGES BENEATH LIVING QUARTERS, AND THAT A ONE-HOUR FIRE WALL BE INSTALLED FOR EVERY TWO PARKING SPACES IN THESE GARAGES; NO DOORS WILL BE REQUIRED ON GARAGES NOT BENEATH LIVING QUARTERS; NO STORAGE, OTHER THAN AUTOMOBILES. WILL BE PERMITTED IN THE GARAGES; AND THE LANDSCAPING WILL BE COMPLETED AND MAINTAINED. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN MC CARON, KING AND MAYOR GREGORY NOES: COUNCILMAN BLEWETT ABSENT: COUNCILMAN HAMILTON Planning Director Gordon stated, for the record, that the Planning Commission had instructed the staff to set up a hearing on requiring separations between garages. 00- It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on 71-S-15, on the northwest side of Puente Avenue between Francisquito Avenue and Datewood Street, for curb, gutter, sidewalk and drive approach, to hear any protests in regard to costs. Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on 71-S-23, on the west side of Bresee Avenue between Lubican Street and Palm Avenue, for sidewalk, to hear any protests in regard to costs. Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. Continued) PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED(ZV-252] DOORS & FIRE WALLS REQ. IN GARAGES BELOW APTS.i NO DOORS REQ. ON OTHERS; NO STORAGE IN GARAGES; LANDSCAPING TO BE COMPLETED & MAINTAINED HEARING TO BE SET ON REQMTS. FOR SEPARA- TIONS BET. GARAGES PUBLIC HEARING SHORT FORM 71-S-15 POSTINGS, MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS PUBLIC HEARING SHORT FORM 71-S-23 POSTINGS. MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 10-U02 20-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9951-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 10 20 CC MIN(ÌìØ, peCCOSW Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on 71-S-30, on the north side of Garvey Avenue between Westcott Avenue and Bess Avenue, for sidewalk a<ld drive approach, to hear any protests in regard to costs. Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on 71-S-31, on the northeast side of Central Avenue between Vineland Avenue and Big Dalton Wash, for sidewalk and drive approach, to hear any protests in regard to costs. Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. TESTIMONY WAS GIVEN BY: Perry Eiszele, 14611 Central Avenue, wished to speak regarding 71-S-31. He stated sidewalks had been installed while he was on vacation. He stated that when the posting had been made, he had come into the Engineer's office and requested that drive approach be installed in conjunction with the sidewalks. When he returned from vacation, there were gaping holes in his tawn, and a 2h ft. hole in the driveway. This was in August. In October, the driveway was titled in; however. the holes between the sidewalk and the property had never been titled in, the grass is growing between the sidewalk and the curb, telephone poles are in the middle of the sidewalk, which makes it difficult for the children walking to school, and the drive approach was never installed. He stated this meant he would have the additional cost of having the sidewalk broken in order to install the drive approach. He further commented that he had even marked the area for the drive approach with stakes. City Engineer French stated that, regarding the telephone pole, this was a constant problem when sidewalk was installed adjacent to curb. Regarding the other problems, he suggested the case be continued to allow investigation. Discussion followed regarding grass growing in the joints between the curb and sidewalk. City Engineer French stated that this was virtually impossible to control, and required maintenance. Mayor Gregory suggested that Mr. Eiszele come in to the City Engineer's Office to discuss a solution to the problems, and Mr, Eiszele agreed to do so. Mayor Gregory stated that Case 71-S-31 would be continued to November 3, 1971. There were no objections. Anthony Perez, 12957 E. Garvey, stated he wished to speak regarding 71-S-30. He stated there was a 6x9 ft. opening in the sidewalk, which had been there for six weeks. He had made two phone calls to the City, but the problem had not yet been corrected. He stated a gas main was setting up about 3 inches, which he thought was the reason the opening had not been filled in, but he felt something should have been done in this length of time. Continued) October 20. 1971 Page 8 PUBLIC HEARING SHORT FORM 71-S-30 POSTINGS. MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS i PUBLIC HEARING SHQRT FORM 71-S-31 POSTINGS. MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS TESTIMONY PERRY EISZELE 14611 CENTRAL AVE. 71-S-31 71-S-31 CONT. TO 11/3/71 ANTHONY PEREZ 12957 E. GARVEY 71-S-30 BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 10-U02 20-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9951-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 10 20 CC MIN(ÌìØ, pecoo^ias Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council City Engineer French stated the Gas Company was to have done work in this area because of the gas main; he suggested that the hearing on 71-S-30 be continued to November 3, 1971 to allow time for investigation of the matter. There were no objections. As there was no one else in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to 71-S-15 or 71-S-23. Mayor Gregory declared the public hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 71-241 CONFIRMING CERTAIN REPORTS OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS 71-S-15 & 23) City Engineer French stated that under Section 1(f) the word no" should be inserted. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 71-241 BE ADOPTED AS AMENDED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on 71-N-54, to determine whether certain premises and buildings and structures constitute a public nuisance at 13847 Los Angeles Street. Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. City Engineer French presented photographs of the property taken on August 20 and October 20, 1971. As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to 71-N-54, Mayor Gregory declared the public hearing closed. Councilman Blewett commented that there were several other houses in this particular area that appeared to be in about the same state of deterioration. City Engineer French stated this was true, and corrective action was being taken; he pointed out that this was not the first public nuisance in the area to come before the Council. Discussion followed regarding the fact that most of the homes in this area are rentals. In answer to Councilman Btewett's question, Mr. French indicated that the percentage of public nuisance cases as far as owners or rental property was concerned was about 50/50. RESOLUTION NO. 71-244 FINDING AND DETERMINING THE EXISTENCE OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING THE SAME ABATED 71-N-54) City Engineer French stated that under Section 2 a time limit of 60" days should be established. COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO- 71-244 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED, There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- October 20, 1971 Page 9 i 71-S-30 CONT. TO 11/3/71 PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED 71-S-15 and 71-S-23 RES. NO. 71-241 CONFIRM COSTS 71-S-15 & 71-S-23 SECTION 1(f) TO READ NO" PROTESTS FILED RES. NO. 71-241 ADOPTED AS AMENDED PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC NUISANCE 71-N-54 POSTINGS. MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS PHOTOS PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED 71-N-54 DISCUSSION RES. NO. 71-244 ORDER ABATEMENT 71-N-54 SECTION 2 60" DAYS TO ABATE RES. NO. 71-244 ADOPTED BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 10-U02 20-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9951-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 10 20 CC MIN(ÌìØ, 1971 10 20 CC MIN(ÌìØ, peCCC519S Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council City Engineer French stated that under Section 2 a time limit of 60" days should be established. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 71-246 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. Councilman McCaron asked whether thf? property owner had been notified. City Engineer French stated that the property owner as shown on the title report had received notification of the hearing, and the lenders had been notified by registered mail; also, the property had been posted. Councilman McCaron reconnended that the owner be contacted before any act of demolition in this case. City Engineer French indicated this would be done. 00- It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on 71-N-58. to determine whether certain premises and buildings and structures constitute a public nuisance at 3572 Patritti Avenue. Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. City Engineer French presented photographs of the property taken on September 20 and October 20, 1971. Mr. French stated that the notification to the owner of record had been returned to his office marked as moved, left no address"; however, the tenders had been notified by certified mail and had indicated receipt of the notification. As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to 71-N-58, Mayor Gregory declared the public hearing dosed. RESOLUTION NO. 71-247 FINDING AND DETERMINING THE EXISTENCE OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING THE SAME ABATED 71-N-58) City Engineer French stated that under Section 2 a time limit of 60" days should be established. COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 71-247 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on Z-349, intent of the Planning Commission to consider a Zone Change from R-1 single family residential) Zone to R-3 heavy multiple residential) Zone on certain real property located at 3136, 3132. 3134, 3128, 3120. 3126, 3122 and 3124 Big Dalton Avenue. Initiated by the Planning Commission. Proper publication, postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. Continued) October 20. 1971 Page 11 SECTION 2 60" DAYS TO ABATE RES. NO. 71-246 ADOPTED PROPERTY OWNER TO BE CONTACTED BEFORE DEMOLITION PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC NUISANCE 71-N-58 POSTINGS. MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS PHOTOS RESUME PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED 71-N-58 RES. NO. 71-247 ORDER ABATEMENT 71-N-58 SECTION 2 60" DAYS TO ABATE RES. NO. 71-247 ADOPTED PUBLIC HEARING Z-349 PUBLICATION. POSTINGS & MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 10-U02 20-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9951-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 10 20 CC MIN(ÌìØ,pe0005199 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council Planning Director Gordon reviewed his report on Z-349. concluding that this was part of the Planning Commission's program to rezone areas which appear to be miszoned, He stated rezoning to R-3 was recommended, inasmuch as the existing use on the property is multi-unit residential and the adjoining parcels are R-3. As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to Z-349, Mayor Gregory declared the public hearing closed. Discussion followed regarding the existing use of the property. Mr, Gordon stated that, although there were single-family units on the property, the density was that of an apartment zone, rather than a single- family zone. In answer to Councilman McCaron's question, Mr. Gordon stated that the rezoning would not preclude the use of the buildings as it presently exists. Discussion followed regarding history of the present R-1 zoning. Councilman King felt zoning should be carefully considered in the future to avoid a repetition of this type of spot zoning". COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES TO R-3, CASE Z-349. AND DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE THE PROPER ORDINANCE. COUNCILMAN MC CARON SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. Councilman McCaron, referring to the Zoning Map, questioned whether the line at the rear of the lot at 3132 Big Dalton was a dedication for a future street.. or a lot split. Mr. Gordon stated he would have to research this. Councilman McCaron requested this information be brought to the Council before the Ordinance was voted on. 00- It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on AZC-52, amendment to the Zoning Code, Sections 9428.9, 9551.3, and 9570.5 regulating household pets in the R-1. R-2 and R-3 Zones. Initiated by the Planning Commission. Proper publication and postings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. Planning Director Gordon reviewed his report on AZC-52, stating that the present ordinance permits only three mammals and only in the R-1 Zone. The proposed ordinance would allow, in the R-1, R-2 and R-2 Zones, three household pets for each single-family home and one household pet for each dwelling, if there is more than one dwelling on the lot; the new ordinance would also allow pets other than mammals. such as fish, canaries, etc, Mr. Gordon stated that the Planning Commission and the staff recommended approval, in that the proposed ordinance would give more people what they want, and at the same time wilt give better guidelines for enforcement. Continued) October 20. 1971 Page 12 RESUME PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED Z-349 CONCUR WITH P.C. RECOMM. REZONE TO R-3 Z-349) ATTY. TO DRAW ORD. QUESTION RE LINE AT REAR OF LOT AT 3132 BIG DALTON PUBLIC HEARING AZC-52 HOUSEHOLD PETS PUBLICATION. POSTINGS, NO WRITTEN PROTESTS RESUME BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 10-U02 20-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9951-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 10 20 CC MIN(ÌìØ,pe05700 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council October 20. 1971 Page 13 Councilman McCaron asked what brought about the request to open up R-2 and R-3 zones for pets. Mr. Gordon stated it was felt that the same standards should apply based not on the zone, but how the prop- erty was developed. He stated that there are many single-family homes in the R-2 and R-3 zones, as well as apartments in the R-1 zone. Discussion followed regarding apartment buildings where each family would have a pet. Mr. Gordon felt that probably this problem would relate back to the management, and whether or not they would allow pets. Mayor Gregory felt this was penalizing those people who lived, for instance, where there were six houses to a parcel. These people were living as in any R-1 residential area, but would be limited to one pet, because of the multi-unit aspect. She felt this was too restrictive. Councilman McCaron asked what the regulation would be for a mobile home park. Mr. Gordon stated this would be considered multi-unit in an R zone; if they were in a commercial zone, they would not be covered by this ordinance. Councilman King pointed out that people do raise certain pets as a hobby, and not for commercial use, stating that he, personally, raised finches. He felt that so long as the pets were properly controlled and contained and did not create an annoying condition to neighbors, a person should be able to raise pets in a reasonable number, but there were cases where three would be too restrictive, particularly where the pets were small and caused no problems. Mayor Gregory felt consideration should be given to those who might raise birds, fish, or other small animals as a hobby. Councilman Blewett suggested the ordinance might be drawn up with a provision for a variance or a hobby license of sorts for those who might wish more than three animals. COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT CASE AZC-52 BE REFERRED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR FURTHER STUDY. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on AZC-53, amendment to the Zoning Code, Section 9552.3(d) R-1 Zone) to allow a 2-foot eave overhang within the 5-foot side yard setback. Initiated by the Planning Commission. Proper publication and postings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. Planning Director Gordon reviewed his report on AZC-53, stating that there had been many complaints from home builders because the Code does not allow eaves to extend Continued) AZC-52 REF. TO PLANNING COMMISSION FOR FURTHER STUDY PUBLIC HEARING AZC-53 2-FT. OVERHANG IN SIDE YARD SETBACK PUBLICATION. POSTINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 10-U02 20-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9951-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 10 20 CC MIN(ÌìØ,peTC5^G1 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council October 20. 1971 Page 14 into the side yard. The cities of El Monte and West Covina permit 24-inch encroachment into side yards. and the County permits 30 inches. The proposed amendment removes the prohibition for encroachment into side yards and changes the permitted encroachment into all yards from 30 inches to 24 inches, which will make the side yard regulations uniform with most other cities and wilt eliminate many complaints from builders; this may also help to encourage new construction and remodeling to upgrade neighborhoods. As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to AZC-53, Mayor Gregory declared the public hearing closed. COUNCILMAN MC CARON MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE AZC-53. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- City Clerk Balkus stated that Mr. and Mrs. Welsh, who had requested to address the Council under Oral Communi- cations. had had their problem resolved by the Planninq Department; therefore, she requested this matter be dropped from the Agenda. There were no objections. 00- City Attorney Flandrick presented resolutions in connection with Cases ZV-248 and ZV-252» which were heard earlier in the evening, and read by title: RESOLUTION NO. 71-248 GRANTING A ZONE VARIANCE APPLICANT: QUALITY BILT CONSTRUCTION; CASE NO. ZV-248; LOCATION: 4719 MERCED) COUNCILMAN MC CARON MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 71-248 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. RESOLUTION NO. 71-249 APPROVING A ZONE VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT GARAGES WITHOUT DOORS. LOCATION: 12726-12732 TORCH STREET; APPLICANT: SHAPELL GOVERNMENT HOUSING; CASE NO.: ZV-252) COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 71-249 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN MC CARON SECONDED. Roll call. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN KING, MC CARON, AND MAYOR GREGORY NOES: COUNCILMAN BLEWETT ABSENT: COUNCILMAN HAMILTON 00- City Clerk Balkus presented a request for a Temporary Use Permit from the Lucky Baldwin Little League, to hold a Swap Meet at the corner of Baldwin Park Boulevard and Live Oak on November 13 and 14, 1971. The Police Department Continued) PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED AZC-53 CONCUR WITH P.C. RECOMMENDATION APPROVE AZC-53 DROP ORAL COMM. REQUEST OF MR. & MRS. WELSH FROM AGENDA RES. NO. 71-248 GRANT ZV-248 QUALITY BILT CONST RES. NO. 71-248 ADOPTED RES. NO. 71-249 APPROVE ZV-252 SHAPELL GOV. HOUSING RES. NO. 71-249 ADOPTED T. U. P. SWAP MEET LUCKY BALDWIN LITTLE LEAGUE BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 10-U02 20-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9951-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 10 20 CC MIN(ÌìØ,peC•00^202 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council October 20. 1971 Page 15 checked the application and found no reason for denial. Mrs. Balkus recommended approval of the application, and waiver of fees. COUNCILMAN MC CARON MOVED THAT THE TEMPORARY USE PERMIT FOR THE LUCKY BALDWIN LITTLE LEAGUE SWAP MEET ON NOVEMBER 13 and 14 BE APPROVED AND THAT FEES BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- Acting City Manager Balkus presented a request for refund of a Conditional Use Permit filing fee in the amount of $125 to Union Oil Company. The amount was charged to the company in error, and the refund was requested by the Planning Department. COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT A $125 REFUND BE GRANTED TO UNION OIL COMPANY. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- Acting City Manager Balkus presented for consideration a Work-Study Agreement with the School District. She stated this was the standard agreement which had been used for the past several years. She recommended that approval and authorization for signing be granted. The term of the agreement is from September 1, 1971 through June 30, 1972. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT MOVED THAT THE WORK-STUDY AGREEMENT WITH BALDWIN PARK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BE APPROVED AND THAT THE PROPER CITY OFFICERS BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN THE AGREEMENT. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- City Engineer French presented reports of work completed under the Short Form 1911 Act on 71-S-16, on the northeast side of Jeremie Avenue between Vinetand Avenue and Downing Avenue, for curb, gutter, sidewalk and drive approach; 71-S-27. on the east side of Puente Avenue between Ramona Boulevard and Baditio Street, for curb and gutter; 71-S-28, on the north side of Garvey Avenue between Westcott Avenue and Syracuse Avenue, for curb, gutter, sidewalk and drive approach, and 71-S-29, on the west side of Westcott Avenue between Garvey Avenue and Torch Street, for curb, gutter, sidewalk and drive approach. RESOLUTION NO. 71-242 SETTING A HEARING DATE FOR ANY PROTESTS OR OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORTS OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS 71-S-16, 27. 28 & 29) COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 71-242 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN MC CARON SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- T. U. P. APPROVED REQUEST FOR REFUND TO UNION OIL CO. GRANT REFUND IM AKT. OF $t25 WORK-STUDY AGREEMENT B. P. UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT AGREEMENT APPROVED; PROPER OFFICERS TO SIGN REPORTS OF WORK 71-S-16 CGS&DA) 71-S-27 C&G) 71-S-28 CGS&DA) 71-S-29 CGS&DA) RES. NO. 71-242 SET HEARING DATE 71-S-16, 27» 28. 29 RES. NO. 71-242 ADOPTED P.H. 11/17/71 BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 10-U02 20-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9951-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 10 20 CC MIN(ÌìØ,peC0b5?03 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council City Engineer French reviewed the Traffic Committee Report dated October 20, 1971. Four items were included in the Report: 1) A request by the Council for review of parking restriction enforcement. Mr. French stated that parking enforcement is consistently a problem, and the Police Depart- ment does not have adequate personnel to supply even token enforcement. The Committee's recommendation is that the 1971-72 budget be amended to provide for a minimum of one parking enforcement officer with appropriate equipment at the cost of $13,000; 2) A request by Council for a review of the parking restriction on Maine Avenue. Mr. McCasline, of McMahan's, felt that a complete restriction of loading would be an undue hardship on their operation. He agreed that trucks would not park on Maine Avenue, and would be there only during loading and unloading operations. After review, the Traffic Committee felt that in view of tighter controls on the loading and unloading that the loading zone should remain and be reviewed periodically on its effect upon traffic, with possible modifications in the future based upon the traffic needs, 3) A request for review of traffic controls around Central School. The Committee was of the opinion that the existing crosswalks should be augmented to reflect the change in student flow, and recommended that the City Council order the crosswalks as outlined in the Traffic Committee Report; 4) A request for a four-way stop at Vine!and Avenue and Garvey Avenue. In reviewing the intersection, the Committee found a need for the installation of a stop sign on Garvey Avenue to better designate the right-of-way. The City Engineer commented on the numerous parking restrictions that had been instituted in the City; however, there are no personnel to enforce them. Councilman McCaron suggested that one of the personnel for the Police Department provided under the Federal employment program be used in this capacity. Chief Adams pointed out that the Federal program would not provide the necessary equipment. City Engineer French stated that the Police Department had made a thorough study of the problem and had indicated in their report that to adequately enforce the approximately 7 miles of restricted parking six days a week, it would require two men full-time. at a cost of $25,000, including equipment; it was not intended that these personnel would be police officers. Councilman Blewett and Councilman King asked approximately how much revenue could be realized through citations. Chief Adams stated that fines for violation of Vehicle Code sections could be as high as $15; or under the Municipal Ordinance, the fines could be as low as $2; it would depend on the parti- cular violation, postings, time limits, etc. Chief Adams stated that the all-day parking in the downtown area had been considered, where people park in customer spaces and, perhaps, ride the bus downtown, and that this had, in fact. been the basis of the complaint. Councilman McCaron felt a report should be presented to the Council at the next meeting, insofar as costs to the City are concerned, and the possibility of utilizing personnel from the Federal program. Councilman Blewett concurred, suggesting that some of the cities in the area that utilize this type of program be contacted to find out how much revenue is realized, what type of equipment is used, etc. Continued) October 20. 1971 Page 16 TRAFFIC COMMITTEE REPORT DISCUSSION ON PARKING ENFORCEMENT REPORT ON PARKING ENFORCEMENT OFFICER TO BE PRESENTED AT NEXT MEETING BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 10-U02 20-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9951-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 10 20 CC MIN(ÌìØ,pe00-05^04 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council COUNCILMAN MC CARON MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE TRAFFIC COMMITTEE ON ITEM 2 AND ORDER THE CROSSWALKS AS OUTLINED ALONG CENTRAL SCHOOL. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. RESOLUTION NO. 71-250 IMPOSING CERTAIN VEHICULAR TRAFFIC REGULATIONS COUNCILMAN MC CARON MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 71-250 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- City Engineer French reviewed his report regarding replace- ment of damaged curb and gutter, which stated, essentially, that based upon estimated damage, if a11 the sidewalk and drive approach was replaced at City expense, the actual cost of replacement, not including removal and haul-away, would be approximately $50,000. He stated that the City Council, at a previous meeting, had indicated the possibility of adopting a policy that damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk be replaced at City expense. This could be handled as a maintenance item; however, Mr. French pointed out that a policy of this type might place a greater liability on the City, and create a demand by property owners for immediate attention greater than could be handled. Mr. French recommended that the Council adopt a policy whereby, regardless of the method used, the property owner's responsibility be limited to replacement cost of the sidewalk and. drive approach, and that the Ci,ty bear all other expenses involved where curb, gutter and sidewalk are damaged due to street trees. He stated this would follow State codes and would be essentially what the other communi- ties in the area follow. Mr. French felt that on small items, it wputd be better economically if the Engineering Department continued to make replacements through the administrative process. Discussion followed regarding different methods of repair and their comparable longevity. Councilman McCaron asked whether any monies for curbs and gutters could be provided from gas tax funds. City Engineer French replied only on select streets. Further discussion followed regarding present ordinance requirements for improvements made as part of a building permit and those made as part of an assessment district; as part of a building permit, the improvements must be paid for by the property owner, while if made as part of an assessment district, the City pays for it. City Engineer French felt it was a justifiable compromise to take the curb and gutter expense out of the building permit requirement and treat it as in an assessment district. He stated no additional funds were required to implement what he was recommending, but it would require an ordinance change. Continued) October 20, 1971 Page 17 ORDER CROSSWALKS ALONG CENTRAL SCHOOL RES. NO. 71-250 IMPOSE TRAFFIC REGS RES. NO. 71-250 ADOPTED POLICY RE REPLACEMENT OF DAMAGED CURB AND GUTTER BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 10-U02 20-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9951-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 10 20 CC MIN(ÌìØ,peCCGS20S Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council October 20. 1971 Page 18 Mr. French clarified his recommendation by stating that, on a replacement basis, the property owner would pay for sidewalk and the City would pay for curb and gutter; the City would bear the expense of any removal involved. COUNCILMAN MC CARON MOVED THAT THE CITY ATTORNEY PREPARE AN ORDINANCE ENCOMPASSING THE CITY ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATION AND PRESENT IT TO THE COUNCIL AT THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- City Engineer French reviewed his report regarding bids received for the construction of a restroom at Central Park West and a mower shed at Morgan Park. He stated the bids had been reviewed by the Director of Recreation and Parks and the City Engineer, and it was recommended that the contract be awarded to At R. Gray, of Covina, in accordance with his low bid. COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT THE CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A RESTROOM AT CENTRAL PARK WEST AND A MOWER SHED AT MORGAN PARK BE AWARDED TO AL R. GRAY, COVINA, IN ACCORDANCE WITH HIS LOW BID. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. Roll call. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- City Engineer French reviewed his report regarding the final acceptance of the Heater Remix and Overlay on Olive Street. He stated the work had been completed in accord- ance with plans and specifications, and recommended that the City Council accept the project and instruct the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT MOVED THAT THE HEATER REMI.X AND OVERLAY ON OLIVE STREET FROM CENTER TO BLEECKER BE ACCEPTED AND THAT THE CITY ENGINEER FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- City Engineer French reviewed his report regarding the final acceptance of asphalt removal and street paving construction on Big Dalton Avenue from Merced Avenue to approximately 770 feet southwesterly. He stated the work had been completed in accordance with plans and specifica- tions. and recommended that the City Council accept the project and instruct the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT MOVED THAT THE ASPHALT REMOVAL AND STREET PAVING CONSTRUCTION ON BIG DALTON AVENUE FROM MERGED AVENUE TO APPROXIMATELY 770 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY BE ACCEPTED. AND THAT THE CITY ENGINEER FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- ATTORNEY TO PREPARE ORDINANCE PER C.E. RECOMMENDATION AWARD OF CONTRACT CENTRAL PK. WEST RESTROOM; MORGAN PARK MOl'ER SHED CONTRACT AWARDED TO AL R. GRAY. COVINA FINAL ACCEPTANCE HEATER REMIX AND OVERLAY OLIVE ST. FROM CENTER TO BLEECKER PROJECT ACCEPTED; CITY ENGR. TO FILE NOTICE OF COMPLETION FINAL ACCEPTANCE ASPHALT REMOVAL & ST. PAVING BIG DALTON FROM MERCED SOUTHWESTERLY PROJECT ACCEPTED; CITY ENGR. TO FILE NOTICE OF COMPLETION BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 10-U02 20-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9951-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 10 20 CC MIN(ÌìØ,peaozaoo-) Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council October 20, 1971 Page 19 Planning Director Gordon reviewed his report regarding RECONNAISSANCE the Reconnaissance Study, stating that the Planning Commission STUDY REPORT and the C.R.A. Study Committee had come up with essentially the same recommendation to initiate such a study. He stated this would be an over-all study of the City, to be accomplished by a consultant at an estimated cost of $2,000 to $4,000. The result wi11 be a five-year development program for the City, with emphasis on commercial and industrial potential. Mr. Gordon stated the staff and the Commission had conferred, and listed priorities for the remainder of the year: 1) Revitalization of the central business district; 2) North- east Baldwin Park; 3) Freeway development; 4) Commercial zoning; and 5) Community design study General Plan. He commented that items 1), 3), and 4) should be considered together, in that they were alt related. Mr. Gordon stated various possibtities were considered, including: 1) Revising the entire General Plan; however, because the City has a General Plan, no federal money would be available, and the cost would be prohibitive, as it would be in the neighborhood of $40,000 plus; 2) Revise the General Plan in stages; and 3) A Market and Feasibility Study. He felt that the most feasible way for Baldwin Park would appear to be number 2). Mr. Gordon pointed out that adjacent cities had been very aggressive in the area of economic studies and creating new General Plans, revitalization programs, etc., and had been very successful, specifically citing Rosemead, Covina, West Covina, City of Industry and El Monte. He stated this had brought new business into the communities and new sales tax dollars, as well as increasing the prestige of the communities. Planning Director Gordon listed some possibilities for the City, along with possible sales tax amounts that could be realized, such as an auto center by the freeway; a regional center; a community shopping center; discount store; home improvement center; heavy equipment center; mobile home sales; vacation trailers, vans sates; etc., along with revitalization of the central business district, and possibly motel and restaurant development along the freeway. He stated that the Reconnaissance Study would include emphasis on commercial and business areas; consideration of residential areas would be mainly to the effect as to how they would affect the business potential of the City. Things considered would be C.R.A., Code enforcement, workable programs, economic base studies, and the specific projects discussed. The Planning Commission and the C.R.A. Study Commission both felt that they did not wish to go into C.R.A. without looking at a complete package to be sure we were utilizing alt the tools available; he stated everyone agreed C.R.A. may be necessary eventually, but every possibility should be considered before going into something like C.R.A., so the Corrmission and the C.R.A. Corrmittee wanted to be sure we had a good, broad-based develop- ment program that would benefit the whole City. Mr. Gordon stated that for the last ten years, the City has had a massive Public Works program; this program was not unlike a basement, in that you must do it before you can do the building; however, the City is now ready to move ahead into the building stage commercial and economic planning. Mayor Gregory thanked Mr. Gordon and the Commission for an excellent report in pointing out problem areas and making an attempt to solve them. Continued) BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 10-U02 20-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9951-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 10 20 CC MIN(ÌìØ,peCti5?07 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council Councilman King felt a great deal of initiative had been taken in this area, and he commended the staff and the Planning Corrmission for their efforts in trying to move the City forward. Councilman Blewett commented this was one of the best things he had seen since being on the Council, and stated he wished to cornnend anyone who had a part in it. He felt the study was a step in the right direction and stated he was very encouraged by it. COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT THE STAFF DESIGN A RECONNAISSANCE STUDY AND PRESENT IT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. Councilman McCaron asked whether any funding had been pro- vided in the budget. Mr. Gordon stated none had been, but when the study was presented to the Council, it would include recommendations or guidelines for possible funding. October 20, 1971 Page 20 STAFF AND PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENDED STAFF TO DESIGN RECONNAISSANCE STUDY There were no objections to the motion. and was so ordered. The motion carried MOTION CARRIED 00- Planning Director Gordon reviewed his memorandum regarding front yard storage in the R-1 zone, stating that the Council had directed the Planning Commission to review the regulations relating to such storage, particularly where there is no rear-yard access. The review was precipitated by a camper body stored in the front yard of the Keltey property at 4728 Landis Avenue. Mrs. Kelley had appeared before Council on October 6, 1971 and indicated that to relocate the camper body would cause a hardship on her and her husband at this time because of the seriousness of her husband's recent surgery. Mr. Gordon stated the Planning Commission recognized the special problem of Mrs. Ketley, and felt the Council might wish to defer enforcement temporarily; however, they did not wish to alter the Code regarding outside storage not being permitted in front yards. Discussion followed regarding possible alternatives avail- able to the Kelleys, considering the undue hardship they would realize by having to relocate the camper body at this time. COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL DEFER ENFORCE- MENT ON THIS PARTICULAR PROPERTY ONLY, PENDING FURTHER STUDY AND INVESTIGATION. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. Councilman Blewett pointed out that almost every house in this particular area had a similar problem; if the people owned a boat or a trailer, etc., with no rear-yard access, they had no place to store them. He felt it was a problem that needed a solution and should be looked into. FRONT YARD STORAGE IN R-1 ZONES DEFER ENFORCEMENT ON KELLEY PROPERTY PENDING FURTHER STUDY Discussion followed. There were no objections to the motion. and was so ordered. The motion carried MOTION CARRIED 00- BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 10-U02 20-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9951-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 10 20 CC MIN(ÌìØ,peX0520S Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council October 20. 1971 Page 21 City Clerk Batkus read by title: ORDINANCE NO. 611 AMENDING CERTAIN OF THE CITY'S ZONING REGULATIONS CASE NUMBERS: AZC-49 AND AZC-51) COUNCILMAN BLEWETT MOVED THAT FURTHER READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 611 BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 611 BE INTRODUCED* COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- Councilman King stated he had received complaints regarding noise created by vehicles crossing over existing railroad crossings, specifically in an area on Pacific Avenue. He stated he understood the railroad had replaced asphalt in the area, and it did create a loud sound when cars crossed. Persons who had complained to the'Engineering Department were told the City had no jurisdiction in this area because it was a railroad problem. Councilman King felt the City should contact the railroad, rather than an individual citizen. City Engineer French stated he would follow up on the request. 00- AT 10:33 P.M., COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- At 11:05 P.M., the City Council reconvened in regular session. Roll call. Same as 7:30 P.M. 00- AT 11:07 P.M.. COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADJOURN TO 5:00 P.M. ON OCTOBER 26, 1971 IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF THE CITY HALL. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- ORD. NO. 611 AMEND ZONING REGS. DEFINE BEDROOM" SET SQ. FT. REQMTS. AZC-49 & AZC-51 FURTHER RDG. WAIVED ORD NO. 611 ORD. NO. 611 INTRODUCED COMPLAINTS RE NOISE OF VEHICLES CROSSING RAILROAD TRACKS CITY ENGINEER TO CONTACT RAILROAD 10:33 P.M. ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION 11:05 P.M. RECONVENED ROLL CALL 11:07 P.M. ADJOURN TO 5:00 P.M. 10/26/71 sJ^^-^^^^A^ THELMA L. BALkUS. CITY CLERK— APPROVED: 1972 zA Date of Distribution to City Council: /^^ Date of Distribution to Departments: P^^A/^^ 1972 1972 BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 10-U02 20-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9951-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 10 20 CC MIN(ÌìØ,pe CITY OF BALDWIN PARK BID OPENING MORGAN PARK MOWER SHED AND CENTRAL PARK WEST RESTROOM SEPTEMBER 27. 1971 10:15 A.M. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS A1 R. Gray 264 Front Street Covina, California Michael Zuniga 15031 Flagstaff La Puente, California Malone Builders 416-C South Rosemead Blvd. Pasadena, California CON-D-COR 15401-H So. Cannenita Rd. Santa Fe Springs, California Tebo Construction Company 12039 Regentview Avenue Downey, California IT MOMOqu$ EM NO. 1 iRGAN PARK WER SHED ANTITY: 14,580.00 ITEM NO. 2 CENTRAL PARK WEST RESTROOM QUANTITY: 1$' 14.329.00 PROPOSAL I ITEMS 1 & 2 SUBTOTAL$ 18.909.00 ITEM NO. 3 CENTRAL PARK WEST RESTROOM QUANTITY: 1$ 14.329.00 PROPOSAL II ITEMS 1. 2 & 3 TOTAL$ 33.238.00 $ 5.036.00 $ 13.954.00 $ 18.990.00 $ 13.982.00 $ 33.372.00 $ 5.322.00 $ 17,082.00 $ 22,404.00 $ 17,082.00 $ 39.486.00 $ 5.458.00 $ 18.112.00 $ 23.570.00 $ 17.500.00 $ 41,070.00 $ 8.694.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 28,694.00 $ 20.000.00 $ 48,694.00 I, THELMA L. BALKUS. CITY CLERK of the City of Baldwin Park. do hereby certify that I opened the foregoing bids in the Council Chambers of the City Hail at 10:15 a.m., September 27. 1971. in the presence of Office Engineer Caresio and Senior Building Inspector Sayre. y^^^^o THELMA L. BALKUS, CITY CLERK BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 10-U02 20-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9951-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 10 20 CC MIN(ÌìØ,peREGULAR MEETING OF THE BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS) 14403 East Pacific Avenue The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park met in regular session at the above place at 7:30 P.M. Roll Call: Present: COUNCILMEN BLEWETT. KING. MC CARON AND MAYOR GREGORY Absent: COUNCILMAN HAMILTON Also Present: ACTING CITY MANAGER/CITY CLERK BALKUS. CITY ATTORNEY FLANDRICK, CITY ENGINEER FRENCH. PLANNING DIRECTOR GORDON. FINANCE DIRECTOR DUNCAN. CHIEF OF POLICE ADAMS Absent: CITY TREASURER CODLING 00- CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARINGS OCTOBER 20, 1971 7:30 P.M. TOLL CALL CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Short Form 1911 Act Parcel Cost 71-S-30 North side of Garvey Avenue between Westcott Avenue and Bess Avenue S&DA) 71-S-31 Northeast side of Central Avenue between Vinetand Avenue and Big Dalton Wash S&DA) 2. AZC-52 Amendment to the Baldwin Park Zoning Code, Sections 9428.9, 9551.3 and 9570.5 regulating household pets in the R-1, R-2 and R-3 Zones. Initiated by the Baldwin Park Planning Connission. 00- AT 11:07 P.M. COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADJOURN TO 5:00 P.M.. TUESDAY. OCTOBER 26. 1971 IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF THE CITY HALL. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- CONTINUED TO n/3/71 CONTINUED TO n/3/71 CONTINUED TO n/3/71 ADJOURN 11:07 P.M. TO TUESDAY. 10/26/71. 5:00 P.M. / THELMA L. 6ALkU§. C17V d-ERK DATED: OCTOBER 21. 1971 TIME: 10:00 A.M. BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 10-U02 20-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9951-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 10 20 CC MIN(ÌìØ,peAFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) SS: CITY OF BALDWIN PARK THELMA L. BALKUS, being first duly sworn, says and deposes: that I am the duly chosen, qualified and acting City Clerk of the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park; that at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park held October 20 19/1 said meeting was ordered adjourned to the time and place specified in the Notice of the Adjournment ATTACHED HERETO: that on October 21 ig71 at the hour of 10:00 a.m.. I posted a copy of said Notice at a conspicuous place on or near the door of the place at which said meeting of October 20 19 71 was held. TtiELHA L. BALKUS, CITV CLERK Subscribed and sworn to before me this / day of /^U^-< 19 / /^l /^y/^ 1PI^•~•~^rlMr^nr^••r^•>l^~ITMlw^M06MIM6^^ Notary Public in and for said County and State 14403 E Paci'i A i-1 JIA JMY 5 197 a- 91706 BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 10-U02 20-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9951-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1971 10 20 CC MIN(ÌìØ,peREGULAR MEETING OF THE BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS) 14403 East Pacific Avenue The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park met in regular session at the above place at 7:30 p.m. Roll Call: Present: COUNCILMEN BLEWETT. KING. MC CARON AND MAYOR GREGORY Absent: COUNCILMAN HAMILTON Also Present: ACTING CITY MANAGER/CITY CLERK BALKUS. CITY ATTORNEY FLANDRICK. CITY ENGINEER FRENCH. PLANNING DIRECTOR GORDON, FINANCE DIRECTOR DUNCAN. CHIEF OF POLICE ADAMS Absent: CITY TREASURER CODLING 00- AT 11:07 P.M. COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADJOURN TO 5:00 P.M., TUESDAY. OCTOBER 26. 1971 IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF THE CITY HALL. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- OCTOBER 20. 1971 7:30 P.M. ROLL CALL ADJOURN 11:07 P.M. TO TUESDAY. 10/26/71. 5:00 P.M. ThELMA L. BALKUS. CITY CLEftK DATED: TIME: OCTOBER 21. 10:00 A.M. 1971 BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 10-U02 20-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9951-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 pert^Y^7 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council It was,the time and place fixed for a public hearing on 71-N-55, to determine whether certain premises and buildings and structures constitute,a public nuisance at 1366 Maine Avenue. Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. City Engineer French presented photographs of the property, which had been taken from an adjoining property, in that the tenant, Mr. Blessing, had ordered the Enforcement Officer not to come on to his property. Mr. French stated this case related to the storage of auto parts; there were approximately eleven automobiles stored on the property, but these were a part of another nuisance case which would come before Council at the next meetinq. Mr. French stated he had talked with Mr. Blessing, who did not feel that this is a bad situation, and he felt he should be allowed to repair cars on the property. In answer to Mayor Gregory's question, Mr. French stated this same property had been before Council previously for the same type of abatement. As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to 71-N-55, Mayor Gregory declared the public hearing dosed. RESOLUTION NO. 71-245 FINDING AND DETERMINING THE EXISTENCE OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING THE SAME ABATED 71-N-55) City Engineer French stated that under Section 2 a time limit of 30" days should be established. COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT RESOLUTION'NO. 71-245 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDEt). There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on 71-N-57, to determine whether certain premises and buildings and structures constitute a public nuisance at 3548 Patritti Avenue. Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. City Engineer presented photographs of the property taken on September 20 and October 20, 1971. He stated the property was open and unsecured, and evidently had been vacated by the property owner. As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to 71-N-57, Mayor Gregory declared the public hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 71-246 FINDING AND DETERMINING THE EXISTENCE OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING THE SAME ABATED 71-N-57) Continued) October 20. 1971 Page 10 PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC NUISANCE 71-N-55 POSTINGS, MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS PHOTOS RESUME PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED 71-N-55 RES. NO. 71-245 ORDER ABATEMENT 71-N-55 SECTION 2 30" DAYS TO ABATE RES. NO. 71-245 ADOPTED PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC NUISANCE 71-N-57 POSTINGS, MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS PHOTOS RESUME PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED 71-N-57 RES. NO. 71-246 ORDER ABATEMENT 71-N-57 BIB] 37659-U01 1971-U02 10-U02 20-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9838-U03 DO9951-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06