The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1972 02 02 CC MIN1972 02 02 CC MIN(ÌìØàpeINDEX FEBRUARY 2, 1972 City Treasurer Codling Excused Oath of Office Patrolman Robert Isaac and Parking Enforcement Officer Phi Hip Thomas Minutes January 5, 1972 and January 19, 1972 Approved Res. No. 72-24 Claims and Demands Adopted Public Hearing AZC-56, 57, 58 & 59 Testimony John Miechowicz Public Hearing AZC-56, 57, 58 & 59 Continued to 3/1/72 Public Hearing AZC-62; Testimony John Miechowicz Discussion Testimony James Q. Gibson Ord. No. 628 Amend Zoning Code re Permitted and Conditional Uses in the C-2 and M-1 Zones AZC-62]) to be Rewritten and Presented for Consideration of Introduction Later in the Evening Public Hearing AZC-60 Page 1 1 1 1 1 & 2 5 & 6 7 7 & 8 Ord. No. 629 Amend BPMC re Non-Conforming Uses AZC-60]) Introduced 9 Public Hearing 72-S-1, 2, 3 & 4 9 Res. No. 72-22 72-S-1, 2, 3 & 4) Adopted 10 Oral Communications Mr. Howard Witlut not Present 10 Emmit Waldo and James Q. Gibson re Sales Tax on Gasoline 10 Business License Fees Refund Approved Jerseymaid Milk Products Co. 10 Claim Jam'ce Stewart 10 Claim Denied and Referred to Insurance Carrier 11 Ord. No. 630 Amend Animal Control Ordinance) Introduced 11 Authorize Purchase of 5 Police Vehicles from Mac Kaig and Sons 11 Res. No. 72-25 Amend Job Classifications Res. No. 71-175]) Adopted 11 Res. No. 72-26 Designating Personnel Authorized to Sign Warrants) Adopted 12 Purchase of Check Signer Authorized 12 City Manager Authorized to Execute Work-Study Agreements with USC & Mt. SAC 12 Res. No. 72-11 71-S-76) Adopted Res. No. 72-23 72-S-5, 6, 7 & 8) Adopted Proposed Vacation of Future Street SP-21) Continued to 2/16/72 Ord. No. 628 Amend Zoning Code AZC-62]) Introduced as Amended Ord. No. 625 Amend Zoning Map Z-351]) Adopted Ord. No. 626 Amend Zoning Map Z-352]) Adopted Ord. No. 627 Amend Zoning Map Z-353]) Adopted Adjourned 10:05 p.m. 13 13 14 15 15 16 16 16 BIB] 37659-U01 1972-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9837-U03 DO9961-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1972 02 02 CC MIN(ÌìØàpeV005P33 REGULAR MEETING OF THE BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS) 14403 East Pacific Avenue The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park met in regular session at the above place at 7:30 p.m. Councilman Blewett led the salute to the flag. Present: COUNCILMEN BLEWETT. HAMILTON. KING. MC CARON AND MAYOR GREGORY Roll Call: FEBRUARY 2. 1972 7:30 P.M. FLAG SALUTE ROLL CALL Also Present: Absent: CITY MANAGER MOCALIS. CITY ATTORNEY FLANDRICK. ACTING CITY ENGINEER HALE. PLANNING DIRECTOR GORDON, FINANCE DIRECTOR DUNCAN, LT. JONES REPRESENTING CHIEF OF POLICE ADAMS. CITY CLERK BALKUS CITY TREASURER CODLING. CHIEF OF POLICE ADAMS 00- COUNCILMAN HAMILTON MOVED THAT THE ABSENCE. OF CITY TREASURER CODLING BE EXCUSED. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- City Clerk Balkus administered the Oath of Office to Patrolman Robert Isaac and Parking Enforcement Officer Phillip Thomas, following which the Mayor presented them with their badges and congratulated them. 00- COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT THE MINUTES OF JANUARY 5. 1972 AND JANUARY 19, 1972 BE APPROVED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- RESOLUTION NO. 72-24 ALLOWING CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 72-24 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. Roll call. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- 7:30 p.m. having arrived, it was the time and place fixed for a continued public hearing on AZC-56, amending the Zoning Code Section 9635 to add time limits for conforming to M-1 standards initiated by the Planning Commission); AZC-57, amending the Zoning Code Sections 9621 through 9624 to add performance and development standards and time limits for compliance in the C-M Zone initiated by the Planning Commission); AZC-58, amending the Zoning Code Continued) CITY TREASURER'S ABSENCE EXCUSED OATH OF OFFICE PATROLMAN ROBERT ISAAC PARKING ENF. OFFR. PHILLIP THOMAS MINUTES OF 1/5/72 AND 1/19/72 APPROVED RES. NO. 72-24 CLAIMS & DEMANDS 4107 4179 PAYROLL PERIOD 1/1/72 1/15/72 RES. NO. 72-24 ADOPTED PUBLIC HEARING AZC-56 AZC-57 AZC-58 AZC-59 BIB] 37659-U01 1972-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9837-U03 DO9961-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1972 02 02 CC MIN(ÌìØàpeCOOS334 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council February 2, 1972 Page 2 Section 9642 through Section 9644 to add performance and development standards with time limits for compliance in the M-2 Zone initiated by the Planning Commission); and AZC-59, intent of the Planning Commission to amend Section 9628 to add performance and development standards with time limits for compliance in the M-R Zone initiated by the Planning Commission). Continued from January 5, 1972) These cases were combined for the purpose of hearing. Proper publication had been accomplished. There were no written protests. PUBLICATION NO WRITTEN PROTESTS Planning Director Gordon stated this was a hearing on reconnendations of the Planning Commission to adopt uniform standards for industrial development in the M-1, C-M. M-2 and M-R Zones, and set time limits for compliance. He stated that the proposed standards are similar to M-1 standards adopted in 1968, and are similar but not as restrictive as those used by developers and industrial parks. He stated that the existing standards differ in each of the M Zones, and many are too weak. Many of the areas are blighted, which makes new business reluctant to come in. Requiring existing uses to clean up within a year will improve the appearance of the M areas and, hopefully, will encourage new business and tenders to grant loans here. Mr. Gordon stated that there were several Chamber of Commerce representatives at the Planning Commission hearings, and they had no objections to the proposed changes. He further stated that the Planning Commission had taken a field trip into the areas, which gave them a better insight into the problems that exist. City Attorney Ftandrick pointed out that no non-conformity would be caused by this ordinance_to any existing now- conforming M-type use, insofar as building height, building location, lot size, etc. The Commission carefully enimierated those items they felt should be brought into compliance within a year, and the existing conforming uses would not be affected, as outlined above. As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to AZC-56. AZC-57, AZC-58 or AZC-59, Mayor Gregory declared the public hearing closed. Councilman Blewett felt the Council should make a field study of the area before voting on the matter. Discussion followed as to possible arrangements for such a field trip. Councilman Blewett asked whether any contact, other than through the Chamber of Commerce, had been made with the people in the M-Zones. Mr. Gordon stated that notices of both hearings had been published in the newspaper. He stated some difficulty would be encountered in locating names and addresses and mailing notices to three or four hundred owners of alt the industrial parcels in the City. Continued) RESUME PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED AZC-56, 57» 58. 59 BIB] 37659-U01 1972-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9837-U03 DO9961-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1972 02 02 CC MIN(ÌìØàpeCt05^35 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council February 2, 1972 Page 3 Councilman Hamilton felt the matter should be given more consideration and that the hearing should be continued. In answer to Councilman Hamilton's question, the City Attorney stated that a change in ownership would have no effect on this, but a change in use would. Councilman King did not feel the changes were so signifi- cant that action could not be taken at this time. COUNCILMAN MC CARON MOVED THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON AZC-56. AZC-57. AZC-58 AND AZC-59 BE REOPENED. SINCE NO ONE HAD LEFT THE ROOM. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. TESTIMONY WAS GIVEN BY: John Miechowicz, 1441 S. 7th Avenue, Hacienda Heights, stated he had owned property in the City for about 20 years, and he knew the Council had done everything in its power to strengthen the zoning laws in the City; however, he felt that the longer you wait before making a decision, businesses which might move in tomorrow will be looking toward other areas. He requested thct the Council reconsider the matter and take action this evening. Mr. Miechowicz stated that the freeway property in Baldwin Park had long been an eyesore, referring mainly to the old trailer parks which had not been brought up to standards, and he felt that by changing this zoning, new business would be attracted to the City which would help it grow and would create employment. Mr. Miechowicz referred to the success realized in the City of El Monte, when Congressman Wiggins was Mayor of that city. Mr. Wiggins inserted an ad in the Wall Street Journal and attracted business to El Monte from all over the country; this was only possible because of action taken by his Council giving these businesses an opportunity to realize that the city would work with them. Mr. Miechowicz further commented that he felt M-1 Zoning was too restrictive without giving the opportunity of C Zoning, par- ticularly where the area lent itself to a business which required a large amount of exposure, such as a car dealership. He felt that limiting the M-1 Zoning would also limit the opportunity for prestigious businesses to develop in an area. Councilman McCaron pointed out that this was not covered in this particular ordinance. Mr. Gordon stated that Mr. Miechowicz was apparently interested in items covered in Case AZC-62, more specifically, the Section which would allow vehicle sates, new and used, in the M-1 Zone. Councilman McCaron felt Mr. Miechowicz1 point of allowing a little more latitude in the occupancy of a parcel of ground warranted consideration. Councilman Btewett stated that before Council acts on a specific matter they should make a specific effort to contact all the people involved to make them aware that a change is being considered, and if it takes 300 letters, then that is what should be done. Continued) PUBLIC HEARING REOPENED AZC-56. 57. 58. 59 TESTIMONY JOHN MIECHOWICZ 1441 S. 7th AVE. HACIENDA HEIGHTS BIB] 37659-U01 1972-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9837-U03 DO9961-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1972 02 02 CC MIN(ÌìØàpeCC0533G Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council COUNCILMAN MC CARON MOVED THAT THE HEARING ON AZC-56. AZC-57, AZC-58 AND AZC-59 BE CONTINUED. The motion died for lack of a second. Discussion followed. Councilman Btewett felt the people involved should be notified before any action was taken by Council. Councilman King felt action could be taken, in that the changes were of no great significance. Councilman McCaron felt that Council should look at the area, and those people who might be interested in the proposed changes should be notified. Councilman Hamilton felt that those who have existing M-1 uses should be notified, because some of the requirements of the ordinance could cause them expense. COUNCILMAN MC CARON MOVED THAT THE HEARING ON AZC-56. AZC-57. AZC-58 AND AZC-59 BE CONTINUED TO MARCH 1, 1972. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON SECONDED. Discussion followed. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- It was the time and place fixed for a continued public hearing on AZC-62, intent of the Planning Commission to amend Section 9630 to add the following as permitted uses in the M-1 Zone: 1) Restaurants; 2) Auto service and repair within garage). Amending also Section 9631 to add the following permitted uses in the M-1 Zone with Conditional Use Permits: 1) On Sate liquor license; 2) Vehicle sales, new and used; 3) Equipment rental; 4) Concrete products manufactured; 5) Steel fabricating and erecting; 6) Paper baling. February 2, 1972 Page 4 MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING MOTION DIED DISCUSSION HEARING CONTINUED TO 3/1/72 AZC-56. 57. 58. 59 DISCUSSION MOTION CAftRIED PUBLIC HEARING AZC-62 Initiated by the Planning Commission. January 5, 1972) Continued from Proper publication had been accomplished. There were no written protests. Planning Director Gordon reviewed his report on AZC-62. He stated that he understood Council had some concern about Conditional Use Permits. He stated that many of the industrial zones were adjacent to R-Zones, so rather than requiring Conditional Use Permits for concrete products manufacture, steel fabricating and erecting and paper baling, an alternative would be to allow these uses in the M-1 zone only when at least 300 feet away from an R-Zone. Mr. Gordon stated it was felt that by adding these uses to the M-1 Zone, the property in these areas would be made more useful, and would be advantageous to the City as well as the property owner. TESTIMONY WAS GIVEN BY: John Miechowicz. 1441 S. 7th Avenue. Hacipnda Heights, stated he would tike to go on record as relating his previous testimony to this case also, Continued) PUBLICATION NO WRITTEN PROTESTS RESUME TESTIMONY JOHN MIECHOWICZ 1441 S. 7TH AVE. HACIENDA HEIGHTS BIB] 37659-U01 1972-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9837-U03 DO9961-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1972 02 02 CC MIN(ÌìØàpeCC053W Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council February 2, 1972 Page 5 Councilman King felt Mr. Gordon's suggested alternative to Conditional Use Permits on the three items was the way these uses should be handled, i.e., allowed in the M-1 Zone if 300 feet from an R-Zone. He felt the City should eliminate as many Conditional Use Permit require- ments as possible. Mr. Gordon suggested that Vehicle Sales-New" might be placed in a category not requiring a Conditional Use Permit, leaving only Vehicle Sales-Used" requiring a Permit. Councilman Hamilton was under the impression that there were conditions imposed on a person who opened a used-car lot, such as paving, a buffer, etc.; if so, he did not see the necessity of having used car sales under a Conditional Use Permit. Mr. Gordon stated that this did not apply only to cars, but to any vehicle sales, such as trucks, heavy construc- tion equipment, motorcycle sales, etc. Discussion followed regarding classification of vehicles. Councilman McCaron felt this was just a piecemeal approach to the problem we are faced with. He felt the standards for development should be set for a11 zones, and AZC-62 should be correlated with AZC-56. 57. 58 and 59. He further stated that he felt C uses should be allowed in M Zones. He stated that the items that did need a Conditional Use Permit to operate should be segregated from all the other uses, and should be allowed only in certain specified areas and under certain conditions, so as not to be detrimental to other development. Councilman King concurred that perhaps the cases could be incorporated, as Councilman McCaron suggested. He felt cities were requiring too many Conditional Use Permits, and it would be better to have the standards and conditions spelled out so that when a potential developer came in, he would know what was required, without waiting to see what conditions would be imposed under a Conditional Use Permit. Councilman Hamilton agreed with Councilman King and Councilman McCaron, and felt the matter should possibly be studied more thoroughly. He also stated he could see an advantage to allowing C uses in M Zones in many cases. Councilman Blewett agreed partially, but questioned whether Conditional Use Permits made it harder or easier on the applicant; in other words, if a package were designed and each person who wanted to start a business was required to fit the mold, but couldn't, how would it work. Councilman McCaron replied that basically, all Conditional Use Permits are on a certain type of usage, and almost all of them have identical requirements, except for possibly one item; he felt standards could be set up to circumvent this, and allow a person to come in when they want to without having to obtain a Conditional Use Permit. If they want anything in excess of what is required, then a Conditional Use Permit would be appropriate, Councilman King comnented that developers also had the option of a variance. Continued) BIB] 37659-U01 1972-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9837-U03 DO9961-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1972 02 02 CC MIN(ÌìØàpeCC05339 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council Planning Director Gordon stated that most cities were getting away from allowing C uses in M.Zones; however, if Council desired this usage, he recommended waiting until we get further into the Business Reconnaissance Study and obtain a consultant's opinion. Mr. Gordon, personally, felt that allowing this type of usage would be a mistake. He stated it would not be good for the industrial areas, nor for the existing commercial areas. He suggested working toward developing comnercial centers, rather than allowing commercial development all over the City. Councilman King asked how long it would be before the Reconnaissance Study would be under way. Mr. Gordon replied probably several months. Councilman McCaron stated he did not think the idea was to attract the downtown" type of commercial operation to an M Zone, but to make the usage as flexible as possible, inasmuch as there is some M-1 Zone that is not fully occupied, and there are some uses in the commercial line that would be very compatible with M-1 usage. Discussion followed. Councilman King felt the Planning Commission should study the matter further, and possibly incorporate this case with AZC-56. 57, 58 and 59, as Councilman McCaron suggested. Councilman McCaron reiterated that he felt commercial uses should be allowed in the M-1 Zone, standards for development should be set, and operations that are offensive should be segregated and require a Conditonal Use Permit. Mr. Miechowicz stated he felt there were two separate entities one requiring immediate action, by giving an opportunity to businesses that need exposure, and that would be an asset to the City. If all these cases are incorporated, as Mr. Gordon indicated, the study will be profound, and may go on for quite some time. He asked Council's consideration of the Planning Commission's recommendation to make these interim changes, which he felt would have immediate advantages to the City. In answer to Councilman McCaron's question. Mr. Miechowicz stated he was specifically interested in the item of Vehicle Sales-New". Councilman Btewett stated he did not feel the City's zoning regulations would be impaired by AZC-62, and if Mr. Miechowicz was interested in opening a business, he felt it was Council's obligation to help him, as it would be an asset to the City. He stated the entire set of regulations needed revamping, but he felt this could be acted upon now, and the entire area studied thoroughly and then amend the Code, Councilman King concurred. Councilman Hamilton was in favor of holding the matter over for a complete study and revamping of the zoning ordinance. Continued) BIB] 37659-U01 1972-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9837-U03 DO9961-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1972 02 02 CC MIN(ÌìØàpe05339 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council February 2, 1972 Page 7 Mayor Gregory felt the Commission had moved ahead with this ordinance, in establishing some very clear guide- lines, and that this ordinance would invite business. She felt that action on the ordinance should be taken now. Councilman Blewett asked Mr. Miechowicz whether he had any specific development in mind. Mr. Miechowicz stated he did a new camper sales business on the freeway adjacent to present camper sales. Mr. Miechowicz stated he felt Mr. Gordon and the staff had made some sound studies concerning this matter, and he felt that continual delays could only impede the City's progress and growth. Councilman King felt passage of this ordinance could not hurt in any way; however, he instructed the staff to confer with the Planning Commission and make a thorough study of the Conditional Use Permits, and changes could be made later. Councilman Btewett stated that if this ordinance would cut down the time it would take a developer to bring^a business into the City, he was in favor of it, because this is what the City wants and needs, and he felt we should do every- thing possible to help relieve the taxpayers in the City. Councilman King stated that all the Council members were of the same mind in this area, in that they want to encourage business to come into the City. James Q. Gibson, 13268 Francisquito Avenue, stated he would like to speak in favor of AZC-62 full speed ahead". As there was no one else in the audience desiring to speak either in favor of or in opposition to AZC-62, Mayor Gregory declared the public hearing closed. City Clerk Balkus read by title: i ORDINANCE NO. 628 AMENDING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF THE BALDWIN PARK ZONING CODE RELATING TO PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES IN THE C-2 AND M-1 ZONES. AZC-62 Discussion followed regarding whether previously discussed changes should be incorporated into the ordinance. City Attorney Flandrick stated that if Council would excuse him and Mr. Gordon for a short time, they would rewrite the ordinance with the changes and present the modified version to Council for consideration of introduction this evening. 00- It was the time and place fixed for a continued public hearing on AZC-60, intent of the Planning Comnission to amend Section 9522.1(c) and 9522.2 relating to nonconforming uses and adding a new section, Implied Abandonment". Initiated by the Planning Commission. Continued from January 5, 1972) Proper publication had been accompli shed. Continued) JAMES Q. GIBSON 13268 FRANCISQUITO PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED AZC-62 ORD. NO. 628 AMEND ZONING CODE AZC-62 DISCUSSION PUBLIC HEARING AZC-60 PUBLICATION BIB] 37659-U01 1972-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9837-U03 DO9961-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1972 02 02 CC MIN(ÌìØà pe005340 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council February 2, 1972 Page 8 There were no written protests. NO WRITTEN PROTESTS City Attorney Flandrick stated that the necessity for RESUME this change was dictated last year by the State Supreme Court, and he summarized the Court's findings in a case regard- ing abatement of non-conforming outdoor advertising structures. The Court ruled that the method of estab- lishing fixed periods of abatement for non-cohformin^ uses was no longer permitted. You may establish a period of time, but it must be only a prima facie period of time. The owner must be given written notice that the time period is up, and he must be given an order of abatement, which is subject to appeal before the Commission and the Council, to allow both of those bodies to hold a hearing to determine whether the period of time 5 years, as written into the proposed ordinance) is a reasonable time under all the circumstances. He stated the changes in the ordinance permit the Coninission and the Council a degree of flexibility. If the owner does not wish to appeal to the Coninission, at the time of the hearing he may present evidence to show that the particular use insofar as the 5-year period is a hardship so far as he is concerned. The Court also indicated that the primary factor to be considered in evidence as far as the Commission and the Council are concerned is the depreciation schedule established by the Internal Revenue Service. Mr. Flandrick pointed out that the wording on Page 1 of the proposed ordinance had been made more flexible regarding what constitutes abandonment of a use» building or structure, in that there shall exist a rebutable presumption of such abandonment whenever use has been discontinued for any reason for a period of 6 months, there has been a change in usage, or an increase in usage. Councilman McCaron felt the property owner should have some advance notice that his property is under surveillance for an abandonment period and he should have some time to think about what he could do with it or time to try to do something with it. Mr. Gordon indicated that after the owner is given the notice, the ordinance provides a 30-day appeal period. City Attorney Flandrick comnented that if the ordinance is adopted, Mr. Gordon would have to inventory the non-conforming uses, and as a part of that inventory he would advise them well in advance of the expiration of the period of time. Mayor Gregory and Councilman McCaron felt this should be spelled out in the ordinance. Councilman McCaron felt the owner should have a 90-day warning period, and an additional 90 days before action is taken against him. City Attorney Flandrick suggested the.addition to the ordinance of a section directing the City Manager to cause through the Planning and Building Departments an inventory of non-conforming uses to be made forthwith, and that the property owners be informally advised at least 90-days in advance of the expiration of the abatement period when the abatement period will expire, and what would have to be done to make it conforming; and include the additional period of time, making the effective date of the order 180 days. Discussion followed. City Attorney Flandrick stated the changes in the ordinance AMENDMENTS TO would be on Page 4, paragraph 3, last tine, change 90 PROPOSED ORDINANCE days to 180 days, and in paragraph 4, fifth line, change Continued) BIB] 37659-U01 1972-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9837-U03 DO9961-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1972 02 02 CC MIN(ÌìØà peTOO^l Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council February 2, 1972 Page 9 appeal period from 30 days to 180 days; this would eliminate the requirement for the inventory of non- conforming uses and any requirement for advance notice. In answer to Councilman McCaron's question, the City Attorney stated that this would not, in any way, preclude the use of the Nuisance Abatement Ordinance. As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to AZC-60, Mayor Gregory declared the public hearing closed. City Clerk Batkus read by title: ORDINANCE NO. 629 AMENDING SECTION 9522 OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO NON-CONFORMING USES CASE NO. AZC-60) COUNCILMAN MC CARON MOVED THAT FURTHER READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 629 BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. There were no objections. The motiori carried and was so ordered. COUNCILMAN MC CARON MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 629 BE INTRODUCED AS AMENDED. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- At this time, the Council excused City Attorney Flandrick and Planning Director Gordon to allow them time to rewrite the Ordinance for AZC-62. 00- PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED AZC-60 ORD. NO. 629 AMEND BPMC AZC-60 FURTHER RDG. WAIVED ORD. NO. 629 ORD NO. 629 INTRODUCED AS AMENDED CITY ATTY. & PLAN. DIR. EXCUSED TO REWRITE ORD. AZC-62) It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on Short Form Case Nos. 72-S-1, on the northwest side of Big Dalton Avenue between Pacific Avenue and Stockdale Street, for curb and gutter; 72-S-2, on the northwest side of Big Dalton Avenue between Sierra Way and Bresee Avenue, for curb and gutter; 72-S-3, on the northwest side of Big Dalton Avenue between Bresee Avenue and Merced Avenue, for curb, gutter and sidewalk; and 72-S-4, on the north side of Frazier Street between Monterey Avenue and Kenmore Avenue, for curb and gutter. Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to 72-S-1, 72-S-2, 72-S-3, or 72-S-4, Mayor Gregory declared the public hearing dosed. In answer to Councilman McCaron's question. Acting City Engineer Hale stated these cases would require a 4/5 vote of the Council, and the property owners in the areas had been contacted. RESOLUTION NO. 72-22 ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS PURSUANT TO SECTION 5870. ET SEQ.. OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE 72-S-1, 2. 3 & 4) Acting City Engineer Hate stated that Section 1(c) should indicate that no" protests were received. Continued) PUBLIC HEARING SHORT FORMS 72-S-1 C&G) 72^S-2 C&G 72-S-3 CG&S) 72-S-4 C&G) POSTINGS, MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED 72-S-1, 2, 3. 4 RES. NO. 72-22 ORDER CONSTRUCTION 72-S-1. 2, 3. 4 SECTION 1(c) NO" PROTESTS BIB] 37659-U01 1972-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9837-U03 DO9961-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1972 02 02 CC MIN(ÌìØàpeCflQ&34:2 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 72-22 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN MC CARON SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- Mr. Howard Willut, who had expressed a desire to speak under Oral Communications, was not present in the audience. 00- Emmit Waldo, 4170 Sharons Way, stated he had been discussing with Mr. Garrow the possibility of a mini-bus system for the City. He asked City Manager Mocalis whether money from sales tax on gasoline could be used for this purpose. Mr. Mocalis replied that the law specifically provided that these funds may be used for a transit system. Mr. Waldo asked whether these funds were earmarked for transportation, or whether they could be used for other purposes. Mr. Mocalis stated that the 1% the City receives may be used for any purpose upon which the City Council might decide. Mr. Waldo requested that a study be made as to where this money might be used to greatest advantage for the City, with due consideration given to the mini-bus system. Mr. Mocalis stated that the proposal Mr. Garrow had made was being pursued with the RTD to see if there could be an arrangement made, possibly to be used in conjunction with other cities. He stated the program would not be of the magnitude to use the entire amount of money, as this amount is in excess of $70,000 per year. He stated that this new source of revenue would be considered at the budget sessions to determine the most advantageous use. James Q. Gibson, 13268 Francisquito, stated he was under the impression that the revenue from sates tax on gasoline must be used for transportation. Mr. Mocalis stated that he had checked with the League of California Cities Legislative Council and the only part of the funds that must be reserved for transportation purposes is the 4/5 of a cent which goes directly to the County. The 1% that comes to the City may be used for any purpose the City desires. Mr. Gibson thanked Mr. Mocalis for the clarification. 00- City Clerk Balkus presented a request for a refund of a business license fee from Jerseymaid Mi 1k Products Company, as their store closed in December, making their license unnecessary. She recommended a refund in the amount of $28.48. COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT JERSEYMAID MILK PRODUCTS COMPANY BE GRANTED A BUSINESS LICENSE FEE REFUND IN THE AMOUNT OF $28.48. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. There were no objec- tions. The motion carried, and was so ordered. 00- City Clerk Balkus presented a claim made on behalf of Janice Stewart, 14861 Sierra Way. She reconnended that the claim be denied and referred to the insurance carrier. Continued) February 2. 1972 Page 10 RES. NO. 72-22 ADOPTED MR. WILLUT NOT PRESENT EMMIT WALDO 4170 SHARONS WAY JAMES Q. GIBSON 13268 FRANCISQUITO BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND JERSEYMAID MILK PRODUCTS CO. REFUND APPROVED IN AMOUNT OF $28.48 CLAIM JANICE STEWART 14861 SIERRA WAY BIB] 37659-U01 1972-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9837-U03 DO9961-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1972 02 02 CC MIN(ÌìØà 1972 02 02 CC MIN(ÌìØà peCC05344 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council February 2, 1972 Page 12 City Manager Mocalis reviewed his report regarding a resolution designating personnel authorized to sign warrants. He stated that at the present time three manual signatures are required on all warrants, including payroll checks; in most cities, payroll checks are done with mechanical signatures and warrants with mechanical signatures and only one manual signature. He stated estimates on the cost of purchasing a check signer had been received, and one could be obtained for $375, with a one-year guarantee, including the signature plate. He recommended that the proposed resolution be adopted, and that the City Manager be authorized to purchase an F & E check signer and dater in the amount of $375. RESOLUTION NO. 72-26 DESIGNATING PERSONNEL AUTHORIZED TO SIGN WARRANTS Discussion followed regarding the procedure for mechanical signing, and the advantages. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 72-26 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT THE CITY MANAGER BE AUTHORIZED TO PURCHASE AN F & E CHECK SIGNER AND DATER IN THE AMOUNT OF $375. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- City Manager Mocalis presented Work-Study Agreements from USC and Mt. SAC. He stated there were no positions at the present time which we intended to use under these agreements; however, 70% of the employee's wages would be paid through USC and 65% through Mt. Sac. This is a federal program, and we would have to employ students sent to the City by the colleges. He felt that, particularly in Parks & Recreation. we had a substantial number of employees in the sunmer time and this would allow us to either expand the number of employees to provide better services, or we could effect a savings on the salary costs of these employees. Authorization of the agreements does not bind the City to employ anyone. He recommended that the Council authorize the City Manager to execute the agreements. COUNCILMAN MC CARON MOVED THAT THE CITY MANAGER BE AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE WORK-STUDY AGREEMENTS WITH USC AND MT. SAC. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- Acting City Engineer Hale reviewed his report regarding Short Form Case No. 71-S-76, on the south side of Frazier Street between Kenmore Avenue and Monterey Avenue, for curb and gutter. He stated that 51.2% of lineal feet of curb and gutter had been installed on this particular street. Continued) RES. NO. 72-26 PERS. AUTH. SIGN WARR RES. NO. 72-26 ADOPTED AUTHORIZE PURCHASE OF CHECK SIGNER WORK STUDY AGRMTS. USC & MT. SAC AUTHORIZE C. M. TO SIGN WORK-STUDY AGRMT- USC & MT. SAC REPORT RE 71-S-76 SHORT FORM BIB] 37659-U01 1972-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9837-U03 DO9961-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1972 02 02 CC MIN(ÌìØàpeCC05345 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council February 2, 1972 Page 13 He stated he had contacted two of the three property owners in the proposed district, Mrs. Green and Mrs. Aubet. and both indicated a desire to have the curb and gutter installed, and to pay for it immediately, in order to avoid administrative costs. RESOLUTION NO. 72-11 ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS PURSUANT TO SECTION 5870, ET SEQ.. OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE 71-S-76) Acting City Engineer Hale stated that Section 1(c) should read that two" protests were filed at the time set for hearing on said matter, and said protests were overruled. Councilman McCaron stated that, in view of the hardship this will impose on Mr. Buckmaster, he felt he should be given the maximum time before it was assessed to the property and that administrative costs should be waived. COUNCILMAN MC CARON MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 72-11 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED, SUBJECT TO THE STIPULATION THAT ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS BE WAIVED AND MAXIMUM TIME BE ALLOWED IN ASSESSING MR. BUCKMASTER'S PARCEL. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- Acting City Engineer Hale reviewed his report on the initiation of Short Form 1911 Act Case Nos. 72-S-5. on the west side of El ton Street between Olive Street and Nubia Street, for curb and gutter; 72-S-6, on the east side of Fortin Street between Olive Street and Nubia Street, for curb and gutter; 72-S-7, on the east side of Lante Street between Nubia Street and Olive Street, for curb and gutter; and 72-S-8, on the west side of Lante Street between Olive Street and Nubia Street, for curb and gutter. RESOLUTION NO. 72-23 DECLARING INTENTION TO CAUSE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 5870. ET SEQ.. OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 72-S-5. 6. 7. & 8) Acting City Engineer Hate stated the people in these areas had been notified, and the initiations would require a 4/5 vote of the Council. COUNCILMAN MC CARON MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 72-23 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered, 00- Acting City Engineer Hale reviewed his report on the proposed vacation of a future street bounded northeasterly by Monterey Avenue, southwesterly by Rexwood Avenue, southeasterly by Baldwin Park Boulevard and northwesterly by Frazier Street. He stated that on January 19, 1972 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 72-20 SP-21) amending the City's Comprehensive General Plan by removal of a proposed street in the above area. The adoption of this resolution necessitated the relinquishment of those parcels Continued) RES. NO. 72-11 ORDER CONSTRUCTION 71-S-76 SECTION 1(c) TWO" PROTESTS RES. NO. 72-11 ADOPTED SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS S. F. INITIATION 72-S-5 C&G) 72-S-6 CfiG) 72-S-7 C&G) 72-S-8 C&G) RES. NO. 72-23 DECLARE INTENT CAUSE CONSTRUCTION 72-S-5. 6, 7. 8 RES. NO. 72-23 ADOPTED PROPOSED VACATION FUTURE STREET BOUNDED BY MONTEREY. REXWOOD. BALDWIN PARK BLVD.. AND FRAZIER SP-21) BIB] 37659-U01 1972-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9837-U03 DO9961-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1972 02 02 CC MIN(ÌìØàpeCC05346 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council February 2, 1^72 Page 14 of land previously dedicated; therefore, it is necessary to vacate those portions of the future street shown on Map V-72-1 copy in official files). Mr. Hale recommended adoption of a resolution order- ing a public hearing on the vacation. Councilman McCaron pointed out that there were several lot splits in this block and he felt Council should have information as to whether some of the parcels had been sold due to the lot splits. He felt the lots should be brought back to one parcel. Councilman King stated this had been discussed at the previous meeting, and the property owners under- stood the parcels would be under a single ownership, that there could be no interior lot created, and that they must provide the necessary easement, and they were in accord. Councilman McCaron stated that this would not conform to the deep lot ordinance if there were still lot splits. If they had been sold, nothing could be done; if not, those lot splits that stilt remain should be rescinded. Councilman King concurred that the lot lines should be removed in order to avoid any future confusion. Discussion followed regarding Lot Split No. 188, consist- ing of three lots, where all the access is through easement from the front lot, and which shows no dedication, according to the drawing. Councilman King and Councilman McCaron felt Council should have the information regarding lot splits before taking action. Mayor Gregory stated the matter would be continued to February 16, 1972 to allow the Engineering Department time to compile the requested information. There were no objections. 00- PROPOSED VACATION OF FUTURE ST. SP-21) CONT. TO 2/16/72 City Attorney Flandrick presented an amended ordinance AZC-62 pertaining to Case No. AZC-62. which had been heard earlier AMENDED ORDINANCE in the meeting. He enumerated the uses which would be permitted with and without Conditional Use Permits, as follows: Permitted uses in the M-1 Zone without a Conditional Use Permit: Automobile Service and Repair Restaurants, without On-Sale License Vehicular Sales, New Equipment Rentals Boat Sates, New and Used Steel Fabricating, etc.. Concrete Products, and Paper Baling, provided they are not located within 300 feet of an R Zone Uses in the M-1 Zone requiring a Conditional Use Penni t: Liquor Establishments, possessing On-Sale Licenses Vehicular Sales, Used In the C-2 Zone, liquor establishments, provided they possess an On-Sale license, will be a permitted use with a Conditional Use Permit. Continued) BIB] 37659-U01 1972-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9837-U03 DO9961-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1972 02 02 CC MIN(ÌìØàpeCP05347 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council February 2. 1972 Page 15 City Clerk Balkus read by title: ORDINANCE NO. 628 AMENDING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF THE BALDWIN PARK ZONING CODE RELATING TO PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES IN THE C-2 AND M-1 ZONES AZC-62) COUNCILMAN MC CARON MOVED THAT FURTHER READING OF ORDINANCE r;0. 628 BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. COUNCILMAN MC CARON MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 628 BE INTRODUCED AS AMENDED. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. City Attorney Flandrick stated that the Ordinance, as amended, would be submitted to the Planning Commission for a report. Mr. Miechowicz felt allowing only new" vehicle sales in the M-1 Zones somewhat restricted the concept of good business, stating that usually it was difficult for someone to purchase a new vehicle without having something to trade in. He suggested that consideration be given to the sale of used vehicles being permitted without a Conditional Use Permit when in conjunction with new vehicle sales. City Attorney Flandrick stated that the Ordinance could be further amended before second reading to provide that Vehicle Sales, New would be a permitted use, and that the sale of used vehicles would be permitted as an accessory use. 00- Planning Director Gordon stated that recently the Planning Commission had recommended to the Council that an informal policy be adopted regarding a time limit for withholding second readings on ordinances for zone changes. The Council felt one year would be a reasonable time, and the Planning Commission is in agreement, except in specific cases where an extension had been requested in writing. COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT SECOND READING ON ZONE CHANGE ORDINANCES BE WITHHELD FOR NOT MORE THAN ONE YEAR. UNLESS A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR A TIME EXTENSION IS RECEIVED. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- City Clerk Balkus read by title: ORD. NO. 628 AMEND ZONING CODE AZC-62 FURTHER RDG. WAIVED ORD. NO. 628 ORD. NO. 628 INTRODUCED AS AMENDED ORD. TO BE SUBMITTED TO P. C. FOR REPORT ORD. TO BE FURTHER AMENDED BEFORE SECOND READING PROCEDURE ON ZONE CHANGES 2ND RDG. ZONE CHG. ORDS. TO BE WITHHELD NOT MORE THAN 1 YR. EXCEPT IF EXTENSION REQUESTED IN WRITING ORDINANCE NO. 625 AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF SAID CITY. AND REZONING CERTAIN HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM ZONE C-1 TO R-3 ZONE CASE NO. Z-351) COUNCILMAN BLEWETT MOVED THAT FURTHER READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 625 BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered COUNCILMAN BLEWETT MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 625 BE ADOPTED COUNCILMAN HAMILTON SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- ORD. NO. 625 AMEND ZONING MAP Z-351 FURTHER RDG. WAIVED ORD. NO. 625 ORD. NO. 625 ADOPTED BIB] 37659-U01 1972-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9837-U03 DO9961-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1972 02 02 CC MIN(ÌìØàpeCC05348 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council February 2. 1972 Page 16 City Clerk Balkus read by title: ORDINANCE NO. 626 AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF SAID CITY AND REZONING CERTAIN HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM C-1 TO R-3 AND R-1 ZONE CASE NO. Z-352) COUNCILMAN BLEWETT MOVED THAT FURTHER READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 626 BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered COUNCILMAN BLEWETT MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 626 BE ADOPTED COUNCILMAN HAMILTON SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- City Clerk Balkus read by title: ORD. NO. 626 AMEND ZONING MAP Z-352 FURTHER RDG. WAIVED ORD. NO. 626 ORD. NO. 626 ADOPTED ORDINANCE NO. 627 AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF SAID CITY, AND REZONING CERTAIN HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM ZONE C-1 TO R-3 ZONE CASE NO. Z-353) COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT FURTHER READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 627 BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 627 BE ADOPTED. COUNCILMAN BLEWETT SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- Councilman Blewett commented that in today's Tribune, a letter had appeared from Mr. John Loomis stating he felt the City had been derelict in placing a needed stop sign at the corner of Merced and Olive Streets. Acting City Engineer Hale stated this matter was currently being considered by the Traffic Coinnittee; they were con- ducting studies at that location and were in the process of evaluating traffic in the area and analyzing the cost factor. 00- AT 10:05 P.M.. COUNCILMAN MC CARON MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADJOURN. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- ORD. NO. 627 AMEND ZONING MAP Z-353 FURTHER ROG. WAIVED ORD. NO. 627 ORD. NO. 627 ADOPTED STOP SIGN AT MERGED & OLIVE STS. AREA BEING STUDIED BY TRAFFIC COMMITTEE ADJOURN 10:05 P.M. THELMA L. bALkUS. CITY tLERK APPROVED: 1972 Date of Distribution to'City Council: l^'/ / / 1972 1972 Date of Distribution to Departments: /W^t // BIB] 37659-U01 1972-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9837-U03 DO9961-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1972 02 02 CC MIN(ÌìØàpeCITY OF BALDWIN PARK BID OPENING FOUR 4) 1972 FOUR-DOOR SEDANS STANDARD SIZE) AND ONE 1) FOUR-DOOR COMPACT SEDAN JANUARY 17, 1972 3:15 P.M. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mackalg & Sons of Monrovia 632 West Huntington Drive Monrovia, California 91016 Unit Price Total Price Four 4) 1972 Four-Door Sedans Standard Size) One 1) 1972 Four-Door Sedan Compact) Sales Tax TOTAL SALES Less Trade-in Allowance Four 4) 1970 Plymouth Belvedere Four-Door Patrol Units. Less Trade-in Allowance One 1) 1968 Chevrolet Nova Four-Door Sedan Compact) CASH AMOUNT DUE Delivery Date 45-60 Days $3.633.87 $14.535.48 $2.795.84 $ 2.795.84 866.57 $18.197.89 $ 2,900.00 $ 725.00 $14,572.89 Certified Check for $1.457.29 Enclosed I. THELMA L. BALKUS. CITY CLERK of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that I opened the foregoing bids in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 3:15 p.m.. January 17, 1972, in the presence of City Manager Mocalis, Captain Hebert and Finance Director Duncan. THELMA L. BALKUS. CITY CLERK BIB] 37659-U01 1972-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9837-U03 DO9961-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1972 02 02 CC MIN(ÌìØàpeREGULAR MEETING OF THE BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS) 14403 East Pacific Avenue The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park met in regular session at the above place at 7:30 p.m. Councilman Blewett led the salute to the flag. Roll Call: Present: COUNCILMEN BLEWETT, HAMILTON, KING, MC CARON AND MAYOR GREGORY Also Present: CITY MANAGER MOCALIS, CITY ATTORNEY FLANDRICK, ACTING CITY ENGINEER HALE, PLANNING DIRECTOR GORDON, FINANCE DIRECTOR DUNCAN, LT. JONES REPRESENTING CHIEF OF POLICE ADAMS, CITY CLERK BALKUS Absent: CITY TREASURER CODLING, CHIEF OF POLICE ADAMS 00- FEBRUARY 2, 1972 7:30 P.M. FLAG SALUTE ROLL CALL CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARINGS CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARINGS CONTINUED TO MARCH 1, 1972 1. a. AZC-56 Amending the Baldwin Park Zoning Code Section 9635 to add time limits for conforming to M-1 standards. Initiated by the Baldwin Park Planning Commission. b. AZC-57 Amending the Baldwin Park Zoning Code Sections 9621 through 9624 to add performance and development standards and time limits for compliance in the C-M Zone. Initiated by the Baldwin Park Planning Commission. c. AZC-58 Amending the Baldwin Park Zoning Code Section 9642 through Section 9644 to add performance and development standards with time limits for compliance in the M-2 Zone. Initiated by the Baldwin Park Planning Commission. d. AZC-59 Intent of the Baldwin Park Planning Commission to amend Section 9628 to add performance and development standards with time limits for compliance in the M-R Zone. Initiated by the Baldwin Park Planning Commission. 00- AT 10:05 P.M., COUNCILMAN MC CARON MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADJOURN 10:05 P.M, ADJOURN. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- cj 2^^y 8^LA^r- THELMA L. BALKUS, CITY CLERK DATED: February 3, 1972 TIME: 10:00 A.M. BIB] 37659-U01 1972-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9837-U03 DO9961-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 pe005343 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council COUNCILMAN BLEWETT MOVED THAT THE CLAIM ON BEHALF OF JANICE STEWART BE DENIED AND REFERRED TO THE INSURANCE CARRIER. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- City Manager Mocalis reviewed his memorandum regarding an ordinance amending the Animal Control Ordinance. He stated a comparison had been made between the County facility and the San Gabriel Valley Humane Society insofar as fees, and the only substantial difference is the fee for impounding bovine animals. He stated that since the impounding of bovine animals is a rare occurrence, and the County facility is considerably more convenient, he recommended adoption of the proposed ordinance. City Clerk Batkus read by title: ORDINANCE NO. 630 AMENDING THE ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE" OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK COUNCILMAN MC CARON MOVED THAT FURTHER READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 630 BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. COUNCILMAN MC CARON MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 630 BE INTRODUCED. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered, 00- City Manager Mocalis stated that the City Clerk had received bids on January 14, 1972 for five police vehicles. The low bid was $14,572.89; the budgeted amount was $14,150, resulting in a deficit of $422.89, which could be made up from other savings He recommended that Council accept the tow bid from MacKaig and Sons, Monrovia, and authorize the purchase of the five vehicles. COUNCILMAN MC CARON MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZE THE PURCHASE OF FIVE POLICE VEHICLES FROM MAC KAIG & SONS, MONROVIA. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR LOW BID. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. Roll call. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- City Manager Mocalis reviewed his memorandum regarding amendment of job classifications, stating that the existing job classification resolution needed amending due mainly to new positions created by our Grants Program. The proposed resolution also officially changes the title of City Engineer to Director of Public Works and City Engineer. He indicated there were no changes in salaries and none contemplated. RESOLUTION NO. 72-25 AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 71-175 RELATING TO JOB CLASSIFICATIONS COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 72-25 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- February 2, 1972 Page 11 CLAIM DENIED REFERRED TO INSURANCE CARRIER AMEND ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE ORD. NO. 630 AMEND ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE" FURTHER RDG. WAIVED ORD. NO. 630 ORD. NO. 630 INTRODUCED AWARD OF CONTRACT 5 POLICE VEHICLES AUTHORIZE PURCHASE FROM MAC KAIG & SONS, MONROVIA JOB CLASSIFICATION AMENDMENTS RES. NO. 72-25 AMEND JOB CLASS IF RES. NO. 72-25 ADOPTED BIB] 37659-U01 1972-U02 02-U02 02-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9837-U03 DO9961-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06