The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1972 09 06 CC MIN1972 09 06 CC MIN(Ìì×"peINDEX SEPTEMBER 6, 1972 Page Minutes August 16. 1972 Approved 1 Treasurer's Report of July 31, 1972 Received and Filed 1 Res. No. 72-116 Claims and Demands Adopted 1 Public Hearing 72-S-23, 24. 25, 26, 27, 28, 29. 30, 31, 32 and 33 1 Construction Ordered 72-S-23, 24, 25. 26, 27, 28, 29. 30, 31. 32 and 33 2 Res. No. 72-117 72-N-4) Adopted 2 Res. No. 72-118 72-N-10) Adopted 3 Res. No. 72-119 72.W-21) Adopted 3 Public Hearing AGP-24 3, 4 & 5 Res. No. 72-120 AGP-24) Adopted 6 Public Hearing SP-25 6 Testimony Emmit Waldo 7 Ord. No. 647 SP-25) Introduced 8 Res. No. 72-121 V-72-3) Adopted 8 Mrs. Amos Slater re Irwindate Speedway Noise Abatement 8 & 9 Proposed Zoning Procedural Changes 9 Proposed Zoning Procedural Changes Referred to Planning Commission 10 Temporary Use Permit Mexican-American Educational Emphasis Inc. Paint House Numbers on Curbs Approved Fees Waived 11 Discussion re All-Night Parking 11 Fee set at $3.00 License Plates bearing tetters DPX" No Fee" 12 initiation of 72-S-34. 35, 36, 37, 38. 39, 40 and 41 12 Hearing set for 10/4/72 72-S-34. 35. 36, 37. 38. 39, 40 and 41 13 Cancellation of Contract and Execution of New Contracts for Traffic Signal Maintenance and Street Lights Approved 13 Revised Policy for Pavement Hookups 13 Res. No. 72-122 Revised Policy for Pavement Hookups) Adopted 14 Z-362 Clyde Branson R-1 to C-2 14 Ord. No. 646 Z-362 Adopted 15 Ord. No. 648 Amending the Baldwin Park Municipal Code Relating to Specific Plans SP-24) Introduced 15 Adjourned to Executive Session 9:53 p.m. 15 Reconvened in Regular Session 10:55 p.m. 15 Adjourned 10:56 p.m, 15 BIB] 37659-U01 1972-U02 09-U02 06-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9837-U03 DO9932-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1972 09 06 CC MIN(Ìì×"pe j'j'^y\jj.\j UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED REGULAR MEETING OF THE BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS) 14403 E. Pacific Avenue The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park met in regular session at the above place at 7:30 p.m. Councilman King led the salute to the flag. The Invocation was given by Rev. Roy D. Brewer, of the First United Presbyterian Church. Present: COUNCILMEN GREGORY, HAMILTON. KING.MC CARON AND MAYOR BLEWETT Roll Call: SEPTEMBER 6, 1972 7:30 P.M. FLAG SALUTE INVOCATION ROLL CALL Also Present: CITY MANAGER MOCALIS. CITY ATTORNEY FLANDRICK. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS PERRY, PLANNING DIRECTOR GORDON, FINANCE DIRECTOR DUNCAN, CAPTAIN HEBERT. CITY TREASURER CALE, CITY CLERK BALKUS Absent: CHIEF OF POLICE ADAMS 00- COUNCILMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT THE MINUTES OF AUGUST 16. 1972 BE APPROVED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- COUNCILMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT THE CITY TREASURER'S REPORT OF JULY 31. 1972 BE RECEIVED AND FILED. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- RESOLUTION NO. 72-116 ALLOWING CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK City Manager Mocalis requested that Warrant No. 5695 be deleted from the Resolution. COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 72-116 BE ADOPTED WITH THE DELETION OF WARRANT NO. 5695 AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON SECONDED. Roll Call. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- City Clerk Balkus administered the Oath to those in the audience desiring to be heard during the meeting. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 0' 7:30 p.m. having arrived, it was the time and place fixed for a public hearing to hear any protests in regard to ordering work on Short Forms Case Nos. 72-S-23, east side of Barnes Avenue between Ramona Boulevard and Salisbury Street for curb. gutter and drive approach; 72-S-24, east side of Barnes Avenue between Salisbury Street and Waco Street for curb, gutter and drive approach; 72-S-25, east side of Barnes Avenue between Fairgrove and Waltham Street for curb, gutter and drive approach; 72-S-26, west side of Barnes Avenue between Chelsfietd Street and Finchley Street for curb, gutter and drive approach; 72-S-27, west side of Continued) MINUTES OF 8/16/72 APPROVED TREASURER'S REPORT OF 7/31/72 RECEIVED AND FILED RES. NO. 72-116 CLAIMS & DEMANDS 5628-5720 PAYROLL PERIOD 8/1/72-8/15/72 RES NO. 72-116 ADOPTED OATH PUBLIC HEARING 72-S-23 CG&DA) 72-S-24 CG&OA) 72-S-25 CG&DA 72-S-26 CG&OA 72-S-27 CG&DA 72-S-28 CG&DA; 72-S-29 C&G) 72-S-30 CG&OA) 72-S-31 CG&DA) 72-S-32 CG&DA) 72-S-33 S^PA) BIB] 37659-U01 1972-U02 09-U02 06-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9837-U03 DO9932-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1972 09 06 CC MIN(Ìì×"pes Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council 0005611 Barnes Avenue between Finchley Street and Aukland Street for curbs, gutter and drive approach; 72-S-28 west side of Barnes Avenue between Aukland Street and Royston Street for curb, gutter and drive approach; 72-S-29, west side of Parres Avenue between Salisbury Street and Blenheim Street for curbs and gutters; 72-S-30, west side of Barnes Avenue between Blenheim Street and St. James Place for curbs, gutters and drive approach; 72-S-31» west side of Barnes Avenue between St. James Place and Ramona Boulevard for cutter, gutter and drive approach; 72-S-32, southeasterly side of Athol Street between Bess Avenue and Fairgrove Street for curbs, gutters and drive approach; 72-S-33, south side of Palm Avenue between Merced Avenue and Jerry Avenue for sidewalk and drive approach. Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. A letter from Jack Levitan, 72-S-31, reauested postponpmpnt of construction until such time as a new building is erected. Mr. Perry stated the City would do everything possible to make the proposed construction conform to Mr. Levitan's future plan. As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to 72-S-23, 72-S-24 72-S-25. 72-S-26, 72-S-27. 72-S-28, 72-S-29, 72-S-30, 72-S-31, 72-S-32, or 72-S-33, Mayor Blewett declared the public hearing closed. Councilman McCaron asked if there might be a hardship case. Mr. Perry stated that no one had written or telephoned on any of the cases. COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS IS HEREBY ORDERED TO TAKE THE STEPS NECESSARY TO CAUSE THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS IN CASE NOS. 72-S-23, 72-S-24, 72-S-25. 72-S-26. 72-S-27, 72-S-28. 72-S-29, 72-S-30, 72-S-31. 72-S-32 & 72-S-33, PURSUANT TO SECTION 5870 ET SEQ OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE. COUNCILMAN GREGORY SECONDED. Roll Call. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on 72-N-4, 4241 Walnut Street, in regard to the cost of abating the Public Nuisance. Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. Director of Public Works Perry reviewed his report September 6, 1972 Page 2 POSTINGS & MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED 72-S-23.24.25.26, 27,28,29.30.31,32, & 33. ORDER CONSTRUCTS 72-S-23 72-S-24, 72-S-25 72-S-26 72-S-27 72-S-28 72-S-29 72-S-30, 72-S-31 72-S-32, 72-S-33. PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC NUISANCE 72-N-4 POSTINGS. MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS RESUME As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf or in opposition to 72-N-4, Mayor Blewett declared the public hearing dosed. RESOLUTION NO. 72-117 CONFIRMING THE CITY MANAGERS REPORT REGARDING CERTAIN SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 72-N-4) COUNCILMAN HAMILTON MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 72-117 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. Continued) PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED 72-N-4 RES NO. 72-117 ADOPTED BIB] 37659-U01 1972-U02 09-U02 06-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9837-U03 DO9932-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1972 09 06 CC MIN(Ìì×"peRegular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council tU-ibl^ September 6, 1972 Page 3 COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on 72-N-10. 14430 California Avenue, in regard to the cost of abating the public nuisance. Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished. There were no written protests. Director of Public Works Perry reviewed his report. PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC NUISANCE 72-N-10 POSTINGS & MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS RESUME As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf or in opposition to 72-N-10, Mayor Blewett declared the public hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 72-118 CONFIRMING THE CITY MANAGERS REPORT REGARDING CERTAIN SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 72-N-10) COUNCILMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 72-118 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so order- ed. 00- It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on 72-W-21, 3635 Stichman Avenue, in regard to the cost of abating the public nuisance. Proper postings and mailings had been accomplished There were no written protests Director of Public Works Perry reviewed his report. PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED 72-N-10 RES. NO. 72-118 CONFIRM. C.M. RPT. RE: SPECIAL ASSESSMENT RES. NO. 72-118 ADOPTED PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC NUISANCE 72-W-21 POSTINGS & MAILINGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS RESUME As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf or in opposition to 72-W-21, Mayor Btewett declared the public hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 72-119 CONFIRMING THE CITY MANAGERS REPORT REGARDING CERTAIN SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 72-W-.21) COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 72-119 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on AGP-24, Intent of the Planning Commission to adopt the following elements to the General Plan: Open Space, Recreation, Conservation and Scenic Highways. Initiated by the Baldwin Park Planning Commission. Proper publication, postings and mailings had been accomplished There were no written protests. Continued) PUBLIC HEARING DECLARED CLOSED 72-W-21 RES. NO. 72-119 CONFIRM C.M. RPT RE: SPEC. ASSESS RES. NO. 72-119 ADOPTED PUBLIC HEARING AGP-24 NO WRITTEN PROTESTS BIB] 37659-U01 1972-U02 09-U02 06-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9837-U03 DO9932-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1972 09 06 CC MIN(Ìì×"pe oeowl j Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council September 6, 1972 Page 4 Planning Director Gordon explained that the purpose of the open space element, which is required by state law is for the cities to inventory alt their vacant land within the city, and see what part of this vacant land should be reserved for recreation or open space purposes. He explain- ed that the map shows all the vacant land within the city or immediately adjacent to the city. The study made was to decide how much of the land should be reserved for recreat- ion purposes, this was made on a projected population for 1990, which is estimated at 63,000 people. Then they took national figures and came up with an estimated amount of acreage which the city should have for open space and recreation, which would be about 252 acres. Land available now is about 136 acres, both school sites that are developed for recreation and the city park system. Many of the open areas are now in public ownership, city, flood control district, corps of engineers, division of highways, and school district which can be an asset to the city. Much of the publicly owned land in the city is poorly maintained and the appearance is a detriment. The city will be losing two Little Leaque Parks, one at Ramona and Hornbrook and the other at Live Oak and Daldwin Park. This was a joint study. Most of the information was supplied by the Recreation and Parks Commission and reviewed by the Planning Commission as priority areas that should be reserved for recreation. He pointed out the various areas on the watt map as follows: Delta Nature Park, Walnut Creek Wildlife Area, ater and Power Right-of-Way, Francisquito-Walnut Creek Site and Olive and Bleeker Site. He passed out two maps, one showing the neighborhood park system, close to almost all the residential areas of the city, the other map depicted larger community parks with special services to serve the whole city. He stated the report in the agenda packet in- cluded a priority list for physical improvements with estimated costs. He stated the status of the Santa Fe Regional Dam Community-Park is under question, however, if it is developed it will be an asset to the city. However, if the park is developed, access would be difficult from this city. Also, it would be an advantage if the area of the dam facing Baldwin Park were landscaped. It was also proposed that the City work with the other public agencies, including the department of Water and Power, in an endeavor to get them to improve the appearance of the property. He questioned the future of quarries surrounding the city when they phase out. Since they are so large, they will have a regional importance on future neighboring development in the city. Thirty or forty years from now they may serve some type of regional facility which will have a direct affect on other facilities in Baldwin Park. He stated the Planning Commission recommended adoption of the four elements of the General Plan including the map and the report in the agenda packet and they suggested that this plan, along with the rest of the General Plan be up-dated annually. They also recommended that these elements become the official policy of the City Council and to be used as a guideline for the expenditures of city monies. In answer to Councilman King, regarding the three undevel- oped school sites, Mr. Gordon stated that the school district was now making population projections. The prpblem with the estimate is in projecting the approximate birth rate. So it is difficult to plan for the community needs within the next 20 years. Mr. Gordon stated the city does not have adequate recreational facilities and the city is fortunate that the school district has the land, although it is not on the tax rolls. It is important to reserve land for future recreation and open space purposes now. This Continued) BIB] 37659-U01 1972-U02 09-U02 06-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9837-U03 DO9932-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1972 09 06 CC MIN(Ìì×"peC 00^14 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council September 6, 19/2 Page 5 will eliminate future purchase of land and houses which is very costly. Mayor Blewett stated that it was unfortunate that the money the schools have used in acquiring and securing the school sites was not their money. So if the sites were sold the money would revert back to the State of California. Therefore. it is not in the school districts best interest to give up the property for other than commercial purposes or park purposes. Houses would be detrimental to the schools. He complimented the Recreation and Park Conmission and the Planning Commission on the very thorough study. As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak either PUBLIC HEARING in behalf of or in opposition to AGP-24, Mayor Blewett CLOSED declared the public hearing closed. AGP-24 Councilman McCaron stated that inasmuch as other cities have parks which are rarely used he questioned whether the number of acres proposed were actually needed. He stated he could not see overbuilding parks, and,as a couple of parcels are privately owned and if they wanted to develop the property the city would either have to purchase the property or let it go. Unless the city is prepared to purchase the ground it should not be included in the list. As regards the Delta Nature Park site, the state has established a price and if the city is interested in purchasing it there are three methods wMch can be used, buy a portion and lease a portion; lease a11 of it subject to future state use; or purchase the entire parcel. This large 70 acre parcel requires development of access from Ramona by way of the wash under the freeway bridge or from the south would require a bridge over Walnut Creek Wash. This larqe parcel would help serve the community. The Santa Fe Dam Regional Park will serve the same purpose as proposed in the Delta Nature Park, so he did not advocate setting aside too much land if it cannot be developed. He felt that using this as a policy in the expenditure of city monies would be a burden for the city and any such purchases or activities should be brought before the Council. Councilman King also complimented the Recreation and Park Commission and the Planning Commission on their comprehensive report. He stated that as this would be on an annual basis. changes could be made as the need arises. Mr. Gordon explained that this was a General Plan and, as such, a guideline for the next 20 years. Also, it does not obligate the city to any expenditure of money. Any expenditure requires approval of the Council in the annual budget. He also explained that the 4 acres per thousand is the criteria that the County and all the cities are using for their recreation plans. In cities where parks are not being used it is usually because there are no public facilities or a good recreation program. Mayor Blewett agreed with Councilman McCaron on the Delta Nature Park, in that he favored the use of school facilities and working on the development of a regional park rather than have the city assuming the total financial burden in acquiring and developing new areas. He indicated that the city should improve developments that are already available. Councilman King did not think the city would have to pay out a great deal if the proposed Delta Nature area were developed as a park. If ingress and egress is made available it would be a remote area for childrens activities. He agreed it would be great to utilize existing facilities but the other facilities should be utilized to their best advantage. Continued) BIB] 37659-U01 1972-U02 09-U02 06-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9837-U03 DO9932-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1972 09 06 CC MIN(Ìì×"peC 005P1^ Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council September 6, Page 6 Councilman Gregory also complimented the Commissions on the comprehensive, understandable study. She stated no one can look into the future, but she felt that this far reaching study will be advantageous to this and future Councils, and in as much as the plan is not binding, she would like to see the Council adopt the plan as presented. Councilman Hamilton agreed that the plan should be left as is, as it is merely a guideline, however, the cost of maintenance should not be over looked. He also commended the Commissions on the plan presented. City Clerk read by title: RESOLUTION NO. 72-120 ADOPTING THE FOLLOWING ELEMENTS TO THE GENERAL PLAN CASE NO. AGP-24) 1. Open Space 2. Recreation 3. Conservation 4. Scenic Highway COUNCILMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 72-120 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on SP-25, an Intent of the Baldwin Park Planning Commission to establish a Special Architectural Zone. Case No. 1, located in downtown Baldwin Park Spanish Mediterranean Theme). The adoption of this plan will require a11 new construction, remodeling, repainting and new signs to be compatible with the theme. Initiated by the Baldwin Park Planning Commission. Planning Commissioner Gordon stated that in the Agenda packet there was a map packet outlining the boundries of the district, a orosposed ordinace» a written descriotion of the motif to be used as a guideline to follow and a page cut of the existing code showing how the theme would be administered. The purpose of the theme is to improve the appearance of the downtown business district. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 9th and they made the following findings: 1, The appearance of the store fronts in downtown Baldwin Park is depressing property values, dis- couraging business and investment and creating a poor image. 2. Requiring all new construction, remodeling, repainting to be architecturally compatible will greatly improve the appearance of downtown. 3. The majority of businessmen, property owners and citizens in the survey favor the Specific Plan Mediterranean theme. The Planning Commission recommends adopting the Ordinance creating an architectural zone in down- town Baldwin Park. Mr. Gordon showed slide photographs taken by the architect, Mr. Ken Heil. who is workina with thp Chamhpr nf Commprcp and the Planning Commission in seeing what other areas have done using this theme. He explained that the purpose is to show what can be done and to show the wide variety of commercial buildings and styles that would fit in under the Spanish Mediterranean Theme. He stated that the emphasis is on compatibility, not uniformity. He stated the theme is ontinuo^? RES. NO. 72-120 RES. NO. 72-120 ADOPTED PUBLIC HEARING SP-25 BIB] 37659-U01 1972-U02 09-U02 06-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9837-U03 DO9932-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1972 09 06 CC MIN(Ìì×"peKegular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council C OO.W1 y September 6, 1972 Page 7 not compulsory for existing uses as remodel or make structural changes. to follow and they will decide what they wish to follow. long as they do not This is just a theme level of expenditure Mayor Blewett asked if the proposed Ordinance had been compared with other cities as to how they had obtained architectural control. He stated it appeared to be a very soft" document as compared to La Puente where they are very forceful in getting businesses to conform to architectural standards. Mr. Gordon stated this city would have the same If not more control, however, the control is limited to the downtown area. The problem will be qettinq enouqh people to remodel or rebuild. Councilman McCaron asked if an arcade was planned. Mr, Gordon stated an arcade was not required, however It was encouraged and would require Council approval. Mr. Enmit Waldo, 4110 Sharons Way, President of the Chamber of Commerce, stated that ten property owners have indicated that they want to remodel their store fronts now and three have indicated that they would like the arcade. He requested that the theme be approved so Improvements can begin and we can start being proud of the City, and so we do not get another purple building in town. Councilman Hamilton stated the arcade over the sidewalks would be nice after the sidewalks are paid for, and that possibly an assessment district could be formed so all stores would have an arcade. Piecemeal will not look good. He suggested meeting with the property owners to get their thoughts on the subject. Councilman McCaron stated that if the arcade was to be pursued further the arcade should be of a type that is not as expensive as some that were shown in the pictures. He stated one"of the first renderings presented for the district showed an arcade that was financially feasible Mr. Gordon stated ft would be up to the owner as to how much he would spend and when. Where there is an interest in making this improvement the city wilt provide the information. An advisory board will review and make recommendations on whether particular plans are compatible with the architectural theme. Councilman King suggested that possibly the owners would sign an agreement to the effect that as such time as 50% of a large area are interested in an arcade then it would be built. This would assure uniformity. Mr. Gordon stated that names of prospective advisory board members will be submitted to the council. The board would consist of three people and two alternates. One could be an architect and the rest businessmen and/or property owners. As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to SP-25, Mayor Blewett declared the public hearing closed. City Attorney Handrick read by title: ORDINANCE NO. 647 ESTABLISHING A SPECIAL ARCHITECTURAL ZONE CASE NO. 1: LOCATION: DOWNTOWN BALDWIN PARK) SP-25) Continued) EMMIT WALDO TESTIMONY PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED SP-25 ORD. NO. 647 ESTAB. ARCHITECTURAL ZONES DOWNTOWN AREA SP-25) BIB] 37659-U01 1972-U02 09-U02 06-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9837-U03 DO9932-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1972 09 06 CC MIN(Ìì×" peCtp^Gl? Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT FURTHER READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 647 RE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN GREGORY SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 647 BE INTRODUCED COUNCILMAN GREGORY SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- It was the time and place fixed for a public hearing on V-72-3, an intent to Vacate a certain portion of Ramona Boulevard in- the City of Baldwin Park. Proper publications and postings had been accomplished There were no written protests. Planning Director Gordon explained that this vacation pertained to a two foot strip on the north east corner on Ramona at Maine Avenue for the proposed Crocker Bank development. This vacation will bring the new building in alignment with Ramona Boulevard and the set back will be two feet further back than the existing buildings. He recommended adoption of the resolution. As there was no one in the audience desiring to speak either in behalf of or in opposition to V-72-3, Mayor Blewett declared the public hearing closed. City Clerk Balkus read by title: RESOLUTION NO. 72-121 ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF RAMONA BOULEVARD WITHIN THE SAID CITY. V-72-3 RAMONA AT MAINE) COUNCILMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 72-121 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- Under Oral Communications, Mrs. Amos Slater, 4814 Stan- croft Street, stated that reqardinq the Irwindale Speedway, she understood that September 1, 1972 was the deadline for some type of noise abatement. Mrs. Slater said she went over to the Speedway to see what had been done because the noise last Friday and Saturday night was louder than it has been on previous weekends. They have put up metal sheets at the bottom of the bteechers and a two foot metal strip across the top. This seems to the noise louder. She stated that in Wilmington, the Los Angeles Harbor has terminated the tease of a race track because of the complaints from residents living in houses constructed after the dragstrip's construction. She stated that in this area homes were constructed prior to the Irwindale dragstrip and the occupants are subjected to noise. She referred to a letter from Mr. Atkinson to the City of Irwindale. a copy of which Mayor Btewett received on July 24. The letter stated that a sound level meter had been purchased that ranges from 60 decibles to 120 decibles. With the meter they took readings before the installation of the metal on the stands and afterwards. The meter indicated that the noise level was reduced 10 decibles. She stated she had a copy of a study made by the Mark Keppet High School, which included a letter from the Los Angeles County Health Department. The letter stated, in part, the noise level at which harmful effects occur. /Pft^4.. t\ September 6, 1972 Page 8 READING WAIVED ORD. 647 INTRODUCED PUBLIC HEARING V-72-3 STREET VACATION RAMONA & MAINE N.E. CORNER PUBLICATIONS & POST INGS NO WRITTEN PROTESTS RESUME PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED V-72-3 RES. NO. 7M21 ST. VACATION V-72-3 RAMONA AT MAINE RES. NO. 72-121 ADOPTED BIB] 37659-U01 1972-U02 09-U02 06-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9837-U03 DO9932-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1972 09 06 CC MIN(Ìì×" peCCOW18 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council September 6. 1972 Page 9 Mrs. Slater stated that the citizens recourse is to file an application with the Assessment Appeals Boards asking for a reduction of property tax rates due to noise. She has applications for anyone who wishes to file and she plans to turn in 1000 applications by the September 15th deadline. She thanked Council for their consideration. City Manger Mocalis stated that on July 16th an oral report was given at the Council meeting indicating that it wilt take about eight weeks for Mr. Atkinson to review the problem. Mr. Mocatis outlined the steps the city could take, as follows: To BSK the City of Irwindale to either revoke or substantially modify thje C.U.P. and if they refuse, then secondly if it is determined that this is a nuisance the city could ask the District Attorney to issue a complaint, and if this failed then we could go into a civil suit. The sound readings have not yet been received. He felt that submission of the applications for reduction of taxes would be helpful if the city does have to sue. Councilman King stated he had received several calls recently regarding the raceway noise. He stated there does not seem to be a reduction in the noise decible level. The noise oes have a psychological effect upon the residents of the area, and he urged action by the Council at the next meeting. Mayor Blewett suggested that the city follow the pro- cedure as outlined by the City Manager. He stated he too had received complaints by telephone. Councilman Gregory stated she lived in the area, and receives many complaints about the raceway noise. A couple of weeks ago when talking on the telephone to someone in the area she had to shout in order to be heard, as the noise was so loud. She suggested that if the raceway meter reading is not satisfactory that the city take measures to have meter readings made by experienced people. In answer to Councilman Hamilton the City Attorney explained that if the city decides not to utilize the District Attorneys office there is a provision for suit action to abate a public nuisance. This can be done by a group of individuals who are affected or suit can be brought in the name of the city; however, this is an expensive procedure. Mayor Btewett suggested that a complaint be filed with the District Attorney before the November election. He again reiterated the steps to be taken as outlined by the City Attorney, He stated as soon as he received Mr. Atkinson's reply, possibly by next week, a letter will be written to the City of Irwindale. 00- City Attorney Flandrick referred to his letter oi August PROPOSED ZONING 29. 1972, regarding Proposed Procedural Changes to the City's PRODECURAL CHANGES Zoning Regulations. The contents have been reviewed by the City Manager, the Director of Planning and himself and they jointly recommeded that Council seriously consider the adoption of the changes. He explained that the changes are with regard to Planning Commission and Zoning Admin- istrative action on any C.U.P. or zone variance. If that Continued) BIB] 37659-U01 1972-U02 09-U02 06-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9837-U03 DO9932-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1972 09 06 CC MIN(Ìì×"pe0005619 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council September 6, 1972 Page 10 Body, hearing that matter does not decide it one way or the other within a period of 30 days after the close of the hearing the matter is automatically referred to the City Council for conduct of hearing and a decision on the case. The other change is that the period for an appeal and the finality date of the action taken by the Commission is changed from 10 days to 15 days. It still reserves the right for any person and the right of the City Council to appeal such decision. He stated this was procedural and a public hearing was not necessary. He stated the Ordinance could be introduced at this meeting or the proposal may be referred to the Planning Commission for review. In answer to Councilman McCaron, the City Attorney DISCUSSION explained that the Director of Planning is the Zoning Administrator. This is for minor variance only. Mr. Flandrick also explained that it is optional as to whether the City Council reviews subdivisions. Councilman McCaron stated it was his recollection that the existing code stipulated 10 days so that any action taken by the Planning Commission would have time to reach the Council and stilt not make the applicant wait any longer than necessary for action on his application- Mr. Flandrick stated the former provision was 10 days or the day following the next regular Council meeting, which ever occured latest. Mr. Gordon stated that the advantage of 15 days or 10 days is that if the Planning Commission minutes are late this gives the Council more time to read the minutes and more time to decide if they wish to appeal. Councilman McCaron stated it was more important for the Council to receive a communication indicating the reasons and the deciding factor for the action by the Planning Commission rather than just an indication of what the vote was. This would help Council to understand the Commissions thinking and the reasons for their actions. Mr. Gordon stated they would try to make the minute reflect the comments of the Planning Commissioners. Councilman Gregory suggested this information be included on the Action Sheet distributed by the Planning Department. Regarding the provision, that within a 30 day period following the close of the Planning Commission hearing, if a decision is not made, then the matter is automatically appealed to the Council, Councilman McCaron questioned the necessity for this as circumstances may arise which require more time. City Attorney Flandrick explained that notwithstanding this language, if the Commission wants additional time, all that they have to do is continue the hearing, however, once the Planning Commission closes the hearing then they must make their decision. COUNCILMAN MCCARON MOVED THAT THE LETTER BE REFERRED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR CONSIDERATION AND COMMENT. COUNCILMAN GREGORY SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. PROPOSED ZONING PROCEDURAL CHANGES REFERRED TO P.C. BIB] 37659-U01 1972-U02 09-U02 06-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9837-U03 DO9932-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1972 09 06 CC MIN(Ìì×" 1972 09 06 CC MIN(Ìì×" peCG05P21 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council uniformity and protection for the citizen. Having the Committee review applications and the findings of the officer in the field provides a check and balance. Mr. Mocalis explained that the Traffic Committee guide- lines would be presented to Council for their edification and approval. The guidelines wilt establish the elements necessary for a permit to be approved or denied. There is also the right to appeal to the City Manager and the City Council. Councilman Gregory questioned the City Manager being a member of the Traffic Committee and then having the City Manager hear an appeal. Discussion followed. Mr. Mocalis suggested that for the purpose of this ordinance the Traffic Committee be reconstituted to be the Director of Public Works, the Chief of Police and some other person to be appointed by the City Manager. Discussion followed that the permit requirements should be made understandable to the layman. Councilman King stated that it was the peoples right to appeal, that there be a token fee and proceed with issuing permits. A report can be made later and then if there are any problems they can be resolved. Discussion. MAYOR BLEWETT MOVED THAT THE APPEAL PROCEDURE BE WITHDRAWN FROM THE ORDINANCE. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON SECONDED. The motion failed to carry by the following vote: Ayes: Mayor Blewett and Councilman Hamilton Noes: Councilmen Gregory, King and McCaron 00- Mayor Blewett requested that those in attendance abide by Roberts Rules of Order and that there be no clapping or unnecessary noise or talking, 00- Further discussion followed regarding the fee. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON MOVED THAT A $3.00 PARKING FEE BE SET PURSUANT TO SECTION 3359 FOR THE FILING OF AN ON-STREET PARKING PERMIT; THAT DISABLED PERSONS WITH LICENSE PLATES BEARING THE LETTERS, DPX" BE ISSUED A NO FEE" INVESTIGATION PERMIT. AND THAT FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS ORDINANCE THE TRAFFIC COMMITTEE BE RECONSTITUTED THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS, THE CHIEF OF POLICE AND SOME OTHER PERSON TO BE APPOINTED BY THE CITY MANAGER). MAYOR BLEWETT SECONDED. Roll call. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- Director of Public Works Perry reviewed his report on the initiation of Short Form 1911 Act Case No. 72-S-34. north side of Illinois Street between Kenmore Avenue and Idaho Street for curb, gutter and drive approach; 72-S-35, north side of Illinois Street between Idaho Street and Merced Avenue for curb, gutter and drive approach; 72-S-36, east side of Kenmore Avenue betweeni Ramona Boulevard and Illinois Street for curb, gutter and drive approach; 72-S-37, east Continued) September 6, 1972 Page 12 SHORT FORM INITIATIONS 72-S-34 CG&DA) 72-S-35 CG&DA) 72-S-36 CG&DA) 72-S-37 CG&DA) 72-S-38 S&DA) 72-S-39 C&G) 72-S-40 C&G) 72-S-41 C&G) BIB] 37659-U01 1972-U02 09-U02 06-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9837-U03 DO9932-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1972 09 06 CC MIN(Ìì×"peC005K2^ Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council September 6, 1972 Page 13 side of Kenmore Street between Frazier Street and Illinois Street for curb, gutter and drive approach; 72-S-38, southwest side of Bess Avenue between Dalewood Street and Leorita Street for sidewalk and drive approach; 72-S-39. southside of Arrow Highway between Lante Street and Calmview Avenue for curband gutter; 72-S-40, south side of Arrow Highway between El ton Street and Gayhurst Street for curb and gutter and 72-S-41. south side of Arrow Highway between Heintz Street and Bleecker Street for curb and gutter. Mr. Perry recommended approval of the initiation of the districts and that the cases be set for public hearing on October 4. 1972. He stated that Districts 72-S-35, 36, 37, 39 and 41 required a four-fifths vote, and Districts 72-S-34, 38 and 40 have fifty percent of the improvements constructed or guaranteed. COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY DECLARES ITS INTENTION TO CAUSE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 5870 ET SEQ. OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 72-S-34.35.36.37.38.39.40 & 41). COUNCILMAN GREGORY SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- Director of Public Works Perry reviewed his report oh the contract for Traffic Signal Maintenance on street liahts. He explained that Traffic Siqnals and street lights are now maintained by the County of Los Angeles. Services of the County and two contractors were analyzed as to costs, retiabilty and dependability, and it was established that a change in contractors would save the City approximately $6,000.00 annually. He recommended that the Council authorize cancellation of the County contract and execution of contracts with Traffic Signal Maintenance and California Edison. He stated that the City Attorney would review the contracts prior to execution. COUNCILMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT THE CONTRACT WITH THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE AND STREET LIGHTS BE CANCELLED AND THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK BE AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE A FIVE YEAR CONTRACT WITH TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE FOR MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND STREET LIGHTS ON RAMONA BOULEVARD AND EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT WITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON TO MAINTAIN THE BALANCE OF THE STREET LIGHTS THROUGHOUT THE CITY. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- Director of Public Works Perry presented a resolution reflecting the new policy for pavement hookup. Basically, if funds are available, the city will pave out on all select system streets for anyone who puts in curbs and gutters where the dedication is to the ultimate right- of-wav of the streets. Also. on non-select, local streets where it is residentially zoned and used the pavement hook up will be provided. Resolution 61-21 only provided pave out for residentially zoned and used property. This resolution wilt include a11 select system streets. RESUME DECLARE INTENT TO CAUSE CONSTRUCTION 72-S-34. 35. 36, 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. CONTRACT TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE EET LIGHTS CANCELLATION OF CONTRACT & EXECUTION OF NEW CONTRACTS APPROVED. TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE & STREET LIGHTS) RESUME RES. RE: REVISED POLICY FOR PAVEMENT HOOKUPS Continued) BIB] 37659-U01 1972-U02 09-U02 06-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9837-U03 DO9932-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1972 09 06 CC MIN(Ìì×"peC005fi?3 Keymar neeiing or me baiawin arK fity counci iseptember 6, iy/2 Page 14 In answer to Councilman McCaron, Mr. Perry exotained DISCUSSION that on any select system street, no matter what the zone, or what the use, the city will provide pavement hook UD. This will not include a subdivision or a conditional use permit. Councilman McCaron asked for clarification of the policy on curb and gutter, on select system streets, where gas tax money can be used. He recalled that in the past, that if dedication was made for the improvements, that the curb and gutter would be included, however, if dedication was not necessary then curb and gutter were not included. Mr. Perry stated that there was another resolution where if a person dedicates on a select system street the city will put in curb and gutter. If he is not on a select system street the city does not offer the same opportunity as a nerson on a select system street. Councilman McCaron stated that future demands for curb and gutter on select system streets would not be as great as in the past and that the city should consider putting these in. He thought that the city would have sufficient funds and this would facilitate the completion of improvements on select system streets. There should be some plan for non-select system streets to bring them up to satisfactory condition. Mr. Perry explained that to not require the property owner on select system streets to spend any money for improvements would substaniatly set back the curb and gutter program and the capital improvement program approved by the Council at the last meeting, A maintenance program was included in the 3 year capital improvement program, which includes almost the entire city. The program will include major streets, completion of curb and gutter work maintenance, new construction and construction of curb and gutter. Councilman King stated he thought the select system streets policy the city has followed in the past should be continued. City Clerk Balkus read by title: RESOLUTION NO. 72-122 ESTABLISHING A REVISED POLICY FOR PAVEMENT HOOKUPS COUNCILMAN MCCARON MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 72-122 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON SECONDED. There ere no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- RES. NO. 72-122 ESTAB. REVISED POLICY FOR PAVE- MENT HOOKUPS SELECT SYSTEM STREETS ON RESIDENTIALLY ZONED AND USED PR( RES. NO. 72-122 ADOPTED. Planning Director Gordon reviewed his report on Zone Case 362» applicant Clyde Branson. He stated the Planning Commission recommended approval of the zone change from R-1 to C-2 on several properties owned by Mr. Branson adjacent to his exist- ing Datsun dealership. The Planning Commission recommended that second reading of the Ordinance be withheld until three conditions were met, one condition being that the applicant sign and record an agreement to remove the two houses on the property within 5 years. Mr. Branson did not want to be committed to the removal of the two houses. The Council indi- cated on August 16, 1972 that this condition be deleted or modified and asked for a report from the Planning Commission. Continued) REPORT RE: Z-362 CLYDE BRANSON BIB] 37659-U01 1972-U02 09-U02 06-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9837-U03 DO9932-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1972 09 06 CC MIN(Ìì×"peCC05B24 Regular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council September 6, 1972 Page 15 The Planning Commission reaffirmed their original recommendation requlrino the removal of the two houses within five years. They-felt that Mr. Branson could appeal to the Council at that time If the removal of the houses became a serious problem. The other two requirements were a requirement to sign an agreement to hold all the lots as one parcel. and the street Improvements required by the building permit. None of the conditions have been met as of this date. City Attorney Flandrick rpad hy title: ORDINANCE NO. 646 AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF ORD. NO. 646 SAID CITY AND REZONING CERTAIN HEREIN DESCRIBED REZONING FROM REAL PROPERTY FROM ZONE R-1 TO C-2. ZONE CASE R-1 TO C-2 Z-362, APPLICANT: CLYDE BRANSON) Z-362 BRANSON COUNCILMAN MCCARON MOVED THAT FURTHER READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 646 BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. COUNCILMAN MCCARON MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 646 BE ADOPTED. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- ORD. NO. 646 ADOPTED. City Clerk Balkus read by title: ORDINANCE NO. 648 AMENDING THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO SPECIFIC PLANS SP-24) ORD. NO. 648 AMENDING M.C. RE SPECIFIC PLANS SP-24) COUNCILMAN MCCARON MOVED THAT FURTHER READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 648 BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN GREGORY SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered, COUNCILMAN MCCARON MOVED THAT ORDINANCE N0.648 BE INTRODUCED. ORD. NO. 648 COUNCILMAN GREGORY SECONDED. There were no objections. INTRODUCED The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- City Manager Mocalis requested that the Council adjourn to an executive session to discuss personnel. AT 9:53 P.M. COUNCILMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADJOURN TO AN EXECUTIVE SESSION. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. ADJOURN TO EXEC. SESSION 9:53 P.M. 00- At 10;55 Council reconvened in regular session. Roll 10:55 P.M. Call. Present: COUNCILMEN GREGORY, HAMILTON. KING. RECONVENED MCCARON. MAYOR BLEWETT AND CITY MANAGER MOCALIS. ROLL CALL AT 10:56 COUNCILMAN GREGORY MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADJOURN. COUNCILMAN KING SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. ADJOURN 10:56 P.M. TriELMA L. bALkUS. tITY CLERK APPROVED; s^/22^^^)c^ 1972 7 Date of Distribution to City Council: September 15, 1972 Date of Distribution to Departments: September 15 1972 BIB] 37659-U01 1972-U02 09-U02 06-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9837-U03 DO9932-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 peRegular Meeting of the Baldwin Park City Council City Clerk Balkus presented a request for a Temporary Use Permit from Mexican-American Educational Emphasis Inc. for waiver of business license fees. The group plans to paint house numbers on curbs. COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT THE T.U.P. BE APPROVED AND THAT FEES BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN GREGORY SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- City Manager Mocalis explained that at the last. Council Meeting the City Council passed Ordinance No. 644, having to do with All Night Parking fee costs. One section provides that there will be a fee assessed for the in- vestigation of each application. It further provides that the Council shall set this fee upon the recommendation of the Finance Director. He stated that the Finance Director had given him a report which indicates the costs to the City for the various steps necessary to con- form the issuance of a permit. It showed that the cost with an appeal was $15.38 and without an appeal, $9.68, It was decided that there would be no fee for the permit itself but there should be a fee for the investigation and appeal. The Finance Director recommended a flat fee of $15.00 be charged for the annual permit fee investigation Councilman McCaron stated the permit fee and the appeal fee should be two separate items. Mayor Blewett was not in accord with either fee, he felt this should be a token type fee" to resolve the parking problem where, through no fault of the property owner, parking was not available. In answer to Councilman Hamilton, Mr. Mocalis explained, that although the Ordinance does not specify an annual investigation, there should be one, as there are changes in automobile ownership. It will be necessary to issue a new decal and investigate yearly to be sure the conditions are the same as when the permit was originally issued. He stated that the State Vehicle Code provides that people that are disabled and qualify for a DPX" license plate be given special dispensation by the State concerning various traffic requirements. He suggested that it would be appropriate to specify a no fee" permit for these people. Discussion followed regarding the need for an annual fee, the amount and the need for a permit being handled and reviewed by departments and the Traffic Committee; that the fee would be forfeited if the application was denied, and the need for an appeal procedure. Mr. Mocalis stated that the Ordinance provides that the applicant go to the Finance Department and then the Police Department conducts a field investigation, the results of which go before the Traffic Committee. The Traffic Committee is responsible for setting up guidelines to accept or reject applications. He explained that there was a rather detailed break down put together by the Police Department, who conducted the study. He also added that much thought was given to the responsiblities of the city before money is taken from an applicant. The basis for a permit will be fully explained before fees are paid so the applicant can determine whether he qualifies. This should cut down on fruitless investigations. The idea behind having a Traffic Committee review applications was for Continued) September 6, 197? Page 11 T.U.P. MEXICAN- AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL EMPHASIS HOUSE NUMBERING T.U.P. APPROVED FEES WAIVED DISCUSSION RE: ALL-NIGHT PARKING BIB] 37659-U01 1972-U02 09-U02 06-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9837-U03 DO9932-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/6/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06