Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1973 01 08 CC MIN1973 01 08 CC MIN(ÌìÔ pe1 N n L x. January 8, 1973 Res No 73-2 Designate B P Urban Growth Center Adopted AZC-66 Pub Hearing Edwin Eiko Alfred Wittig Joe Cale Trailer EVIS Purchase Approved HUD Grant S V H S Food Giant Parking Lot Study Adjourned 11:35 p.m, BIB] 37658-U01 1973-U02 01-U02 08-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9836-U03 DO9889-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/5/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1973 01 08 CC MIN(ÌìÔ peC05?2^ UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS) 14403 East Pacific Avenue The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park met In adjourned regular session at the above place at 7:30 p.m. Councilman Gregory led the salute to the flag. Roll Call: Present: COUNCILMEN GREGORY. HAMILTON. KING. MC CARON AND MAYOR BLEWETT Also Present: CITY MANAGER MOCALIS, PLANNING DIRECTOR GORDON. CAPTAIN HEBERT. CITY CLERK BALKUS Absent: CITY ATTORNEY FLANDRICK, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS PERRY, CITY TREASURER CALE, FINANCE DIRECTOR DUNCAN. CHIEF OF POLICE ADAMS 00- City Manager MocaHs presented JANUARY 8. 1973 7:30 P.M. FLAG SALUTE RESOLUTION NO. 73-2 PROPOSING THAT BALDWIN PARK BE DESIGNATED AN URBAN GROWTH CENTER UNDER THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1965 He explained that the adoption of this resolution would assist the City's grant program. The resolution would be presented at a meeting on Tuesday, January 9» 1973 at 11:30 a.m. He recommended adoption. COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT RES. NO. 73-2 BE ADOPTED AND THAT FURTHER READING BE WAIVED. COUNCILMAN GREGORY SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- Mayor Blewett stated that the main purpose of the meeting was to discuss AZC-66. new standards for C-P, C-1 and C-2 zoning. This Public Hearing was continued at the January 3, 1973 Council meeting. Planning Director Gordon presented a draft of an Ordinance containing the recommendations for change or clarification. He asked that Council consider and approve or disapprove the recommendations and then instruct the City Attorney and him to bring the Ordinance back to Council in final form. Mayor Blewett declared the Public Hearing open. Councilman McCaron asked for further discussion of Section 9615 4) Yards, a) Front. After discussion, Council agreed that the front yard setback, except for the downtown area, would be 10 feet. Councilman McCaron stated that he felt that in Section 9615 4) Yards b) Side, the 10 feet was excessive. Mr. Edwin Eiko, 13057 Bess Avenue, stated he preferred a 5 foot side yard adjacent to residential. He also recommended an ornamental masonry wall with a height regulation, even if it Is on the property line, as this would be better than junk. He recommended that wherever a conmercial development abuts a residential zone that no openings be permitted. RES. NO. 73-2 DESIGNATE BALDWIN PARK AN URBAN GROWTH CENTER UNDER ECON. DEVEL. ACT 1965 RES. NO. 73-2 ADOPTED PUBLIC HEARING AZC-66 PUBLIC HEARING OPEN FRONT YARDS SIDE YARDS EDWIN ELKO 13057 BESS AVE. Continued) BIB] 37658-U01 1973-U02 01-U02 08-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9836-U03 DO9889-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/5/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1973 01 08 CC MIN(ÌìÔ peCC05'?23 Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council January 8, 1973 Page 2 Councilman Hamilton agreed that open space in C and M zones tends to collect junk and weeds. Mr. Gordon stated that if this was in the code as a specific standard it would not be necessary to mention in the precise plan. He suggested that there be 10 foot side yards to allow for encroachments. He stated that a building or high ornamental wall on the property line would hurt the retail value of residential areas; however, a reasonable height wall with no openings and a 10 foot side yard would be more acceptable. Councilman McCaron suggested making the height limit 10 feet with a 5 foot side yard. Mr, Gordon stated that the proposed ordinance changes as written would allow encroachments in the 20 foot rear yard under certain conditions. The intent would be that there would be a 10 foot side yard adjacent to R zones, but build- ings would be allowed to encroach within the 10 feet provided they were less than 12 feet in height and they had no open- ings or exterior mechanical equipment within the side yard area. Councilman McCaron stated this would apply only to new con- struction. Section 9616 8) Landscaping^ Mr. Gordon stated the code had always required landscaping, however, the ordinance proposes detailed standards for designers. This is the same as in the West Covina Code as it has worked well for them. With the traditional 6 foot wall separation from residential property the planting of trees will provide additional screening. Section 9616 8) f) Front Yards. Mr. Gordon stated that 10 foot front yards adjacent to R zones would have 50% land- scaping and all others would have 25% of the yard landscaped. Mr. Gordon explained that up to this point the ordinance applied to new construction. He stated that the remainder of the ordinance pertained to existing and future commercial operations in the commercial zones with one year for compli- ance. Section 9617 Operation and Maintenance Standards 1) Walls. Mr. Gordon stated that for wall requirements on the front the wall is to be 3 foot high masonry or hedge; on the side 6 foot high masonry or hedge; rear 6 foot solid or hedge. The difference between the rear and the rest is that by allowing a solid wall a wood fence could be used to get away from the cost of masonry. These substitutions would reduce costs for existing developments and if well main- tained, would have a better appearance. Mr. Eiko stated hedges would be better than having marked walls; however, the code should stipulate that the hedges must be trimmed on both sides and maintained. He also questioned the use of wooden posts, which will rot out. Discussion followed that costs of maintenance are the responsibility of the owner. Councilman McCaron questioned whether masonry would be required for refuse storage. Mr. Gordon stated he was convinced that masonry is the easiest and cheapest to maintain wood or chain link will look worse after a couple of years. Continued) LANDSCAPING DETAILED OPERATION & MAINTEN- ANCE STANDARDS WALLS. REFUSE STORAGE EDWIN ELKO BIB] 37658-U01 1973-U02 01-U02 08-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9836-U03 DO9889-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/5/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1973 01 08 CC MIN(ÌìÔ peKQ^J^A Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council January 8, 1973 Page 3 Discussion followed regarding the durability of metal with wooden posts, all wood, small portable buildings with a door, or masonry for the storage bins. Councilman McCaron stated that possibly Brooks Products could design a preformed refuge storage yard which would be less costly than a masonry wall. Mr. Gordon explained that most people put the refuse walls against the building with a gate. He stated that mechanical equipment did not pertain to swamp coolers or room type air conditioners, as these usually have an exterior type of screening. Councilman Hamilton stated he felt screening of mechanical equipment should pertain to new construction only, Councllmen King, Gregory and Mayor Blewett Indicated the mechanical equipment screening should apply to both old and new development. Councilman Hamilton stated this could be costly to the small businessman and asked If there could be an estimated cost for this type of screening. Mr. Alfred Wittig, 4707 North Edna. stated that on an average four sheets of metal at about $8.00 a sheet would suffice and the cost would be well under $100. Councilman Hamilton again stated this would be placing costs on small businesses and some of them would find this a hard- ship. He did not feel that roof equipment was too unsightly. Building fronts should be fixed up first as the roofs and backs of buildings and yards would be an added expense. Also. in a year signs will be changed. If too many require- ments are imposed some people would close up and empty build- ings add to the deterioration of an area. Mr. Wittig stated there were some extremely ugly roof air conditioning units facing residences behind them. This was where Improvements are needed. However, it Is not a matter of life or death- Councilman King stated the ordinance would allow substitution of shrubs and require masonry for trash receptacles and the screening of mechanical equipment. These requirements would not be extremely costly but would make buildings more aes- thetically pleasing and enhance areas throughout town. Councilman Gregory stated she has been here 25 years and had not seen much change to the rear of business properties on Ramona Blvd.; that Council should possibly consider this a complete package; front, rear and roof, which would not be too costly. Otherwise the ordinance allowing one year to comply would not be necessary. Discussion followed that the costs would be In direct propor- tion to the size of the business structures, large or small. Mr. Gordon stated the sign requirement would be effective in about 3 years from now and that the final draft of this ordinance would clarify in detail all the items discussed. The requirement of screening of minor mechanical equip- ment will be considere and handled Individually. Continued) MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ALFRED WITTIG 4707 N. EDNA ALFRED WITTIG BIB] 37658-U01 1973-U02 01-U02 08-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9836-U03 DO9889-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/5/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1973 01 08 CC MIN(ÌìÔ pe G05^ Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council Councilman McCaron asked for one or two sample costs in general for an average business of the overall effect of all these requirements being met at once; fence, hedge, trash enclosure, and screening. Discussion followed and Mayor Blewett stated a determina- tion of sample costs would not be objectionable and in the meantime the ordinance can be redrawn and both can be pre- sented to the Council for consideration at the same time. Discussion followed regarding the costs and the time require- ments for the improvement standards. Councilman Hamilton suggested 3 years to comply and deletion of mechanical equip- ment atop buildings and that possibly one item at a time should be required. Mr. Gordon suggested 2 years on mechanical equipment. Mr. Wittig stated priorities could be established. The most important right now is trash enclosure. Mr. Joe Cale, 4453 Benham, requested that the small business man be given consideration; that he would like to see improve- ments but he requested that more time be allowed as they are costly. He stated that removal of his small roof sign would cost approximately $100.00 and it will cost his neighbor $250.00 to remove a sign. He stated that the labor, not the metal, is the major cost in screening. Councilman Hamilton stated we should keep the business people we have and also try to bring in new business. Mayor Blewett stated the Council should analyze why new business is not attracted to the City, that one of the reasons they do not come in is because they have to feel they will be reasonably successful and if they are going into an area that is definitely substandard and not a good area, they have to assume that the chances of their business succeeding are some- what limited and so that leaves the City with the responsibil- ity of trying to upgrade the area so that the new businessmen will come in and feel that they can have a reasonable chance of success with their business. He thought this was one of the primary problems we have in Baldwin Park. Mayor Blewett suggested that a letter be sent to the Food Giant shopping center reminding them of their responsibility in maintaining the parking lot. Councilman McCaron commented that just cleanup will not attract business; that it takes a business that carries better merchan- dise to sell and it will sell. He cited Philippes Restaurant in Los Angeles as being an old building in an old section, sawdust on the floor, etc., as a going business because they have food people like and want. Councilman Hamilton stated that refuse storage yards are needed, but that he did not think it was necessary to have the other requirements. Discussion followed concerning allowing 2 years for mechanical screening. Mayor Blewett indicated that 2 years for screening was adequate. Councilman King agreed. Further discussion followed regarding costs of the improvements for an average business. Councilman Gregory stated that main- tenance of business properties was long overdue and the lack of maintenance is detrimental to the value of both commercial and residential properties. Continued) January 8, 1973 Page 4 SAMPLE COSTS OF ALL REQUIREMENTS JOE CALE. 4453 BENHAM BIB] 37658-U01 1973-U02 01-U02 08-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9836-U03 DO9889-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/5/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1973 01 08 CC MIN(ÌìÔ peAdjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council January 8, 1973 Page 5 The proposed ordinance was referred to the Planning Director to rewrite, allowing 2 years for screening. The ordinance and the estimated cost report are to be presented to Council at the February 7, 1973 Council meeting. 00- City Manager Mocalis stated that at the January 3. 1973 meeting Council had requested a cost comparison on leasing versus purchasing a trailer for the East Valley Informa- tion System. Also the possibility of leasing office space In the area was to be investigated. He asked Captain Hebert and Lieutenant Aldrich to make the presentation and answer questions and he asked that the matter be resolved and action authorized as the Grant started Decem- ber 1. 1972. Lieutenant Aldrich explained that the EVIS grant was writ- ten In 1971. assuming that it would be funded In July, 1972. When the funds were allotted, Los Angeles County ended up with 8.2 minion dollars, and they found that their second and third year projects, that were now on-going, consumed that entire amount of money. In November the California Council on Criminal Justice found that they had an excess of monies from the 1970-71 fiscal year left over so they had earmarked any savings to go to priority projects which they had picked. There were four and Baldwin Park happened to be one of these projects, however, this money must be spent before June 30. 1973. The City now has the problem of get- ting bids and waivers and getting the project under way and using the money. There is no way to put additional personnel into existing facilities and trailer facilities adjacent to the Department would maintain a more harmonious working relationship. Four or five usable locations were reviewed. The area over Crocker Bank is available at about 35( a square foot. There was no real commitment as to whether the General Telephone office space could be leased and there were problems such as no rest room facilities, and they may want to divide the office space for leasing. With both these locations there would be the problems of cost of system lines to be run over for that particular facility, security of files, and additional cost for telephone lines. They plan to have a 24-hour phone num- ber available so that the member agencies can contact investi- gators and have them respond to any given situation. The trailer on the City lot appeared to be the best approach as personnel would be more centralized. After discussion, it was the feeling that the ordinance would allow the location of the trailer. He requested a decision as to use of a trailer or a building facility. Councilman McCaron stated that the Police Department had expressed a preference for a trailer at the last meeting. He asked how Room 100 was being used and stated that if the City owned the property it could be leased to the Agency. Lieutenant Aldrich stated that the installation of the Confer- ence in Room 100 would not allow enough space unless a portion of Civil Defense was relocated. However, the location would be most acceptable. They need about 1200 square feet and new construction would be required which would be more costly than a trailer. He stated the grant would allow $450 a month for any facility. It will pay 45^ a square foot for a minimum of 1,000 square feet. Councilman King asked where the trailer could be located. Continued) TRAILER EVIS GRANT LEASE VS PURCHASE BIB] 37658-U01 1973-U02 01-U02 08-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9836-U03 DO9889-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/5/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1973 01 08 CC MIN(ÌìÔ peTOS^W Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council January 8, 1973 Page 6 Lt. Aldrich stated that they had two options, one being next to the Chief*s office parallel to the building. The second would be out by the steps next to the metal build- ing. This would cause some loss of parking spaces; how- ever, Mr. Perry indicated he felt he could allow 5 to 7 additional parking spots over in the Public Works Yard to place some of the Police Department units that are not in operation. The electrical problem should also be consid- ered if the trailer is placed at the far end of the build- ing, as the hookup cost will be about $500. If placed near the Chief's office, the cost would be $100 to $150. Councilman Hamilton asked what would be the difference be- tween trailer purchase cost and lease cost. Lt. Atdrich stated two bids had been received. Angeles Mobile Lease Co. would provide one 20 x 55 trailer at $423.10 including tax, with $320 for setup and $300 take- down, on an 18-month tease, with an option to break that lease on June 30, 1974 when our first year grant expires. However, they wanted a payoff at that particular time of $907, and that was not quite acceptable. Their trailer was $13,597 to purchase outright. Scotchman Mobile Leas- ing same size trailer, same equipment $414.75 a month, $294 setup and $189 takedown, their lease expiring on June 30, 1974 with no penalty. The second year lease would remain at the same rate. Purchase price $12,323, including tax and purchase can be made at any given per- iod. At the end of a 12-month period the purchase price would be $10,161, at the end of 24 months, $8,776, and 36 months at $7,391. It is anticipated that this grant will run the full 30 months. This would realize a revenue of $16,200 over that period of time, so if the lower bid is accepted, there would be a net gain of about $3.800 at the end of 3 years. The anticipated value of that particu- lar trailer at the end of 3 years would be about $7,000, so if we invested $12,000 we would make $3,000. There would be an equity in the trailer that should sell for $7.000, or we could probably use that trailer when construction is started for the moving of the offices back and forth and temporary locations. Councilman King asked the total amount of the grant. Lt. Aldrich stated $16.200 for a 55 x 20 trailer. Councilman McCaron asked if an inquiry had been made as to whether these companies are renting trailers to the schools for classrooms. Lt. Aldrich stated that the Baldwin Park School District does lease from Angeles Leasing Co. and it is actually the same trailer except that we have specified that we want a certain number of enclosed offices and a certain number of partitioned offices and they have agreed to provide those offices accord- ing to our designs included in the purchase price.) This also includes carpeting. City Manager Mocalis stated that at the end of the 18 months they would want $907 lack to cover the cost of financing. Lt. Aldrich explained that the trailer without the partitions and without the carpeting would run somewhere in the area of $340 a month so f they were charging $402, that would mean that $50 a month would be applied to the partitioning and carpets so that during a 6-month period it would cost about $1,300 to instt^t partitions and carpet in a trailer. Continued) LEASE VS. PURCHASE COSTS DETAILED BIB] 37658-U01 1973-U02 01-U02 08-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9836-U03 DO9889-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/5/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1973 01 08 CC MIN(ÌìÔ pea;o.- rt^<n>. 3 d Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council January 8, 1973 Page 7 Councilman Hamilton stated It appeared that the City would be better off to buy the trailer. Councilman King agreed. Councilman Gregory asked 1f the grant monies that are required to be spent would almost cover the trailer cost and the Inter- ior building costs. Lt. Aldrtch replied yes." Councilman Gregory asked If we are spending grant money for this, plus the wiring, or Is the wiring under matching funds. Lt. Aldrich stated that they allow $450.00 a month and that is all. If we leased, we would have the difference between $414.00 and $450.00 that could be applied to any additional expenditures that we accumulated on the structure. This would make extra office space and leave enough left over to place a couple of people in the trailer. Councilman Hamilton stated that If we purchased we would be about $11,000 better off at the end of 3 years, so he would favor purchasing. Mayor Blewett and Councilman McCaron agreed that it would be best to purchase. Councilman Gregory stated she was concerned, as the transformer often goes off and she suggested that the Edison Co. be con- tacted as to the cost of Including another transformer and wiring which could cost about $500. Lt. Aldrich stated that the Edison Co. would be contacted. Mr. Mocalis stated that concerning the parking problem he under- stood that the Telephone Company would let us use 17 of their spaces in back of their building. We will lose about five spaces with the trailer so we wilt have more adequate parking even with the addition of the trailer. He concurred with Lt. Aldrich's report, as we seem to end up with over $11,000. He recommended that the trailer be purchased as outlined In the report dated January 4, 1973 for the approximate amount of $12,323 and that this money be taken out of unappropriated surplus and that the revenue derived from renting this space be put back into the surplus as it Is accumulated. COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT THE TRAILER BE PURCHASED AS OUTLINED IN THE REPORT DATED JANUARY 4, 1973 FOR THE APPROXIMATE AMOUNT OF $12.323 AND THAT THIS MONEY BE TAKEN OUT OF UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS AND THAT THE REVENUE DERIVED FROM RENTING THIS SPACE BE PUT BACK INTO THE SURPLUS AS IT IS ACCUMULATED. COUNCILMAN GREGORY SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- City Manager Mocalis stated that about one and one half years ago extensive Improvements were proposed at Baldwin Park High School. Subsequently it was agreed with the School District that the Improvements should be made at Sierra Vista High School. This cost totaled $70,000. These are five projects, Including the renovation of the Morgan Park Plunge. All five, Legacy of Parks) HUD rant Projects were approved on January 5. 1972. The City will receive $49,000 in grant money; the other $49,000 has been set aside for these projects. The money was to be available within a few days and work on the baseball diamond will proceed as soon as possible. CJ- PURCHASE TRAILER FOR $12,323 APPROVED BIB] 37658-U01 1973-U02 01-U02 08-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9836-U03 DO9889-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/5/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1973 01 08 CC MIN(ÌìÔ pecoo^^ Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council Councilman King requested that Mr. Mocalis discuss a method of requiring maintenance of the Food Giant parking lot. 00- Planning Director Gordon stated that Development Research Associates have completed the first half of the Business Reconnaisance Study and he suggested a joint meeting of the City Council and the Planning Commission for present- ation of the Study. Tuesday, January 30, 1973, was set as the date for the joint meeting. 00- AT 9:14 P.M. COUNCILMAN MC CARON MOVED THAT COUNCIL ADJOURN TO AN EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS PERSONNEL MATTERS. COUNCILMAN GREGORY SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- January 8, 1973 Page 8 FOOD GIANT PARKING LOT MAINTENANCE BUSINESS RECON. STUDY JOINT MEETING CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION 9:14 P.M. At 11:35 p.m. Council reconvened in regular session. Present: COUNCILMEN GREGORY. HAMIL" MC CARON AND MAYOR BLEWET Also present: CITY MANAGER MOCALIS COUNCILMEN GREGORY. HAMILTON. KING. MC CARON AND MAYOR BLEWETT CITY MANAGER MOCALIS 00- RECONVENED 11:35 P.M. AT 11:36 P.M. COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADJOURN. COUNCILMAN HAMILTON SECONDED. There were no objections. The motion carried and was so ordered. 00- ADJOURN 11:35 P.M. /&-^^<^ 9^ THELMA L. bALKuS. CITY CLfcftK / / APPROVED: ia^^7 1973 Date of Distribution^ro City Council: T-^^^^^c^ 1973 Date of Distribution to Departments: 1973 BIB] 37658-U01 1973-U02 01-U02 08-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9836-U03 DO9889-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/5/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06 1973 01 08 CC MIN(ÌìÔ peREGULAR ADJOURNED MEETING OF THE BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 8, 1973 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS) 14403 East Pacific Avenue The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park met in regular adjourned session at the above place at 7:30 p.m. Councilman Gregory led the salute to the flag. FLAG SALUTE Roll Calls Present: COUNCILMEN GREGORY, HAMILTON, KING ROLL CALL MCCARON AND MAYOR BLEWETT Also Present: CITY MANAGER MOCALIS, CAPTAIN HEBERT CITY CLERK BALKUS, PLANNING DIRECTOR GORDON Absent: CITY ATTORNEY FLANDRICK, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS,PERRY, FINANCE DIRECTOR DUNCAN, CHIEF OF POLICE ADAMS, CITY TREASURER CALE 00- CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 1. AZC-66 Intent of the Baldwin Park Planning'Commission CONTINUED TO to revise Sections 9591 et seq, 9601 et seq and 9611 et 2/7/73 seq of the Baldwin Park Zoning Code on Development Standards for Commercial Zones C-P, C-l and C-2. Initiated by the Baldwin Park Planning Commission, continued from 12/20/72 and 1/3/73). 00- AT 11:36 COUNCILMAN KING MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADJOURN, ADJOURNED AT COUNCILMAN HAMILTON SECONDED. There were no objections. The 11:36 P.M motion carried and was so ordered. 00- i/--" THELMA L, BALKUS, CITY CLERK DATED: January 9, 1973 TIME; 10:00 Aoivi. BIB] 37658-U01 1973-U02 01-U02 08-U02 CC-U02 MIN-U02 LI1-U03 FO9591-U03 FO9836-U03 DO9889-U03 C4-U03 MINUTES1-U03 2/5/2003-U04 ROBIN-U04 REGULAR-U05 SESSION-U05 CITY-U06 COUNCIL-U06