HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998 033 CC RESO1998 033 CC RESO¹òw @˜ ‘ t RESO 98-33 MAY 6 1998YH38 RESOLUTION NO.98-33
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN
PARK, CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR
STREET PARK MAINTENANCE IN A CITYWIDE:- PARK MAINTENANCE
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Provisions of Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of
the State of California, being known as the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" an Engineer's Report has
been prepared consisting of plans and specifications, an estimate of the cost, a diagram of the Maintenance
District and an assessment relating to what is now known and designated as:
CITY or BALDWIN PARK CITYWIDE PARK MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
Hereinafter referred to as the District'); and
WHEREAS, there now has been presented to this City Council, the Report as required by Division 15
of the Streets and Highways Code and as previously directed by Resolution; and
WHEREAS, this City Council has now carefully examined and reviewed the Report as presented and
is satisfied with each and all of the items and documents as set forth therein and is satisfied that the
assessments, on a preliminary basis, have been spread in accordance with the benefits received from the
maintenance to be performed as set forth in said Report.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, CALIFORNIA,
DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2. That the Report as presented, consisting of the following:
a. Plans and Specifications
b. Estimate of the Cost
c. Diagram of the Maintenance District
d. Assessment of the Estimated Cost
is hereby approved on a preliminary basis and is ordered to be filed at he office of the Director of Public
Works as a permanent record and to remain open for public inspection.
SECTION 3. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of the Resolution and the
Minutes of the meeting shall so reflect the presentation of the Engineer's Report.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of May,1998.
BETTE LOWES MAYOR
BIB]
37175-U01
RESO-U02
98-33-U02
MAY-U02
6-U02
1998-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
FO1927-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
RESO-U05
98-33-U05
MAY-U05
6-U05
1998-U05
BIB]
37426-U01
1998-U02
033-U02
CC-U02
RESO-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
CITY-U05
COUNCIL-U05
MINUTES-U05
1998 033 CC RESO¹òw @˜ ‘ t RESO 98-33 MAY 6 1998YH38Resolution 98- 33
May 6, 1998
Page 2
ATTEST:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
I, LINDA L. GAIR, City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was
duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park at its regular meeting of the City
Council on May 6,1998 by the following vote:
AYES: MUSE, LOZANO, PACHECO, VAN CLEAVE, MAYOR LOWES
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
BIB]
37175-U01
RESO-U02
98-33-U02
MAY-U02
6-U02
1998-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
FO1927-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
RESO-U05
98-33-U05
MAY-U05
6-U05
1998-U05
BIB]
37426-U01
1998-U02
033-U02
CC-U02
RESO-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
CITY-U05
COUNCIL-U05
MINUTES-U05
1998 033 CC RESO¹òw @˜ ‘ t RESO 98-33 MAY 6 1998YH38CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
BALDWIN
P A R K
ENGINEER'S REPORT
for
CITYWIDE PARK MAINTENANCE
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FISCAL YEAR 1998-99
Sid JaIaI Mousavi
Director of Public Works
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
May 6, 1998
BIB]
37175-U01
RESO-U02
98-33-U02
MAY-U02
6-U02
1998-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
FO1927-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
RESO-U05
98-33-U05
MAY-U05
6-U05
1998-U05
BIB]
37426-U01
1998-U02
033-U02
CC-U02
RESO-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
CITY-U05
COUNCIL-U05
MINUTES-U05
1998 033 CC RESO¹òw @˜ ‘ t RESO 98-33 MAY 6 1998YH38 TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Synopsis...............................................................2
District Financial Summary.............................................3
Boundary...............................................................4
Method of Assessment...................................................5
Assessment Roll.......................................................16
Description of Improvements...........................................17
Cost Estimate.........................................................18
Certifications........................................................19
1
BIB]
37175-U01
RESO-U02
98-33-U02
MAY-U02
6-U02
1998-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
FO1927-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
RESO-U05
98-33-U05
MAY-U05
6-U05
1998-U05
BIB]
37426-U01
1998-U02
033-U02
CC-U02
RESO-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
CITY-U05
COUNCIL-U05
MINUTES-U05
1998 033 CC RESO¹òw @˜ ‘ t RESO 98-33 MAY 6 1998YH38 CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
ENGlNEER'S REPORT
FOR
THE CITYWIDE PARK MAINTENANCE
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FISCAL YEAR 1998-99)
SYNOPSIS
This report complies with Articles XIIIC and XIIID of the California Constitution and the
Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. Also part of this report, but not bound herein, is the
assessment roll on file with the City Clerk which indicates each Assessor Parcel Number's
City of Baldwin Park Park Maintenance Assessment District assessment for Fiscal Year
1998-99.
To comply with requirements of Article XIII of the California Constitution, enacted through
the passage of Proposition 218 on November 5,1996, the Citywide Park Maintenance
Assessment District was formed in FYI 997-98.
The Citywide Park Maintenance Assessment District is proposed to generate $403,356 of
the $987,120 cost for park maintenance. The City will contribute $460,336 which
represents general benefits not assessed). Under the proposed FY 1998-99 Citywide Park
Maintenance Assessment District, the typical homeowner will pay $22.60 for a special
benefit conferred upon his/her property by the Citywide Park Maintenance Assessment
District.
2
BIB]
37175-U01
RESO-U02
98-33-U02
MAY-U02
6-U02
1998-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
FO1927-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
RESO-U05
98-33-U05
MAY-U05
6-U05
1998-U05
BIB]
37426-U01
1998-U02
033-U02
CC-U02
RESO-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
CITY-U05
COUNCIL-U05
MINUTES-U05
1998 033 CC RESO¹òw @˜ ‘ t RESO 98-33 MAY 6 1998YH38 THE CITYWIDE PARK MAINTENANCE
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FISCAL YEAR 1998-99)
DISTRICT FINANCIAL SUMMARY
Estimated Uncommitted Fund Balance
as of June 30, 1998 $ 135,811
Proposed City Contribution for General Benefit
Fiscal Year 1998-99 460,336
Proposed Assessment Revenue
Fiscal Year 98-99 403,356
Total Revenue $999.503
Park Maintenance Operating Expenses
Fiscal Year 98-99 987,120
Total Expenses $ 987,120
Estimated Uncommitted Fund Balance
as of June 30,1999 $1238300
3
BIB]
37175-U01
RESO-U02
98-33-U02
MAY-U02
6-U02
1998-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
FO1927-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
RESO-U05
98-33-U05
MAY-U05
6-U05
1998-U05
BIB]
37426-U01
1998-U02
033-U02
CC-U02
RESO-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
CITY-U05
COUNCIL-U05
MINUTES-U05
1998 033 CC RESO¹òw @˜ ‘ t RESO 98-33 MAY 6 1998YH38 BOUNDARY
The City of Baldwin Citywide Park Maintenance Assessment District includes all parcels
of land within the City's corporate boundaries. Reference is made to +he Los Angeles
County Assessors maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of all
parcels within the District.
A map showing the exterior boundaries of the District is on file in the City Clerk's Office and
incorporated herein by reference.
4
BIB]
37175-U01
RESO-U02
98-33-U02
MAY-U02
6-U02
1998-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
FO1927-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
RESO-U05
98-33-U05
MAY-U05
6-U05
1998-U05
BIB]
37426-U01
1998-U02
033-U02
CC-U02
RESO-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
CITY-U05
COUNCIL-U05
MINUTES-U05
1998 033 CC RESO¹òw @˜ ‘ t RESO 98-33 MAY 6 1998YH38 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
INTRODUCTION
Section 22573 of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15, Part 2, of
the Streets and Highways Code, states that, the net amount to be assessed upon lands
within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly
distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the
estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." As
the assessments are levied on the basis of benefit, they are not a tax, and therefore, are
not governed by Article XIIIA of the California Constitution.
As a result of the passage of Proposition 218 by voters on November 5,1996, Articles
XIIIC and XIIID have been added to the California Constitution. The new procedural and
approval process outlined in these Articles applies to new assessment districts and
increased assessments. In addition, properties owned by public agencies, such as a city,
county, state or the federal government, must now be assessed by law unless it can be
demonstrated that they receive no special benefit.
Specifically, the assessment methodology for the Citywide Park Maintenance Assessment
District will have to:
Demonstrate special benefit to assessed parcels over and above the benefits
conferred on the public at large: Special benefit means a particular and
distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property
located in the district or to the public at large. General enhancement of
property value does not constitute special benefit'."
* Separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred to parcels:
Only special benefits are assessable, and an agency must separate the
general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel."
* Determine the special benefit that should be attributed to public agency
parcels within the new District boundary: Parcels within a district that are
owned or used by any agency, the State of California or the United States
shall not be exempt from assessment unless the agency can demonstrate
by clear and convincing evidence that such publicly owned parcels in fact
receive no special benefit."
5
BIB]
37175-U01
RESO-U02
98-33-U02
MAY-U02
6-U02
1998-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
FO1927-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
RESO-U05
98-33-U05
MAY-U05
6-U05
1998-U05
BIB]
37426-U01
1998-U02
033-U02
CC-U02
RESO-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
CITY-U05
COUNCIL-U05
MINUTES-U05
1998 033 CC RESO¹òw @˜ ‘ t RESO 98-33 MAY 6 1998YH3 8 IMPROVEMENTS
The items that may be funded through the new District are defined in the Landscaping and
Lighting Act of 1972 the Act) as Improvements. The Act defines Improvements to include
the installation, maintenance and servicing of several types of landscaping and park and
recreational improvements and facilities as shown below. However, the new District can
only assess for the special benefit that can be shown to be conferred from these
improvements to the properties in the District.
Installation
9 The installation or planting of landscaping.
* The installation or construction of statuary, fountains and other ornamental
structures and facilities.
* The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any
of the foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance
or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of
debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or
paving, or water, irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities.
* The installation of park or recreational improvements, including, but not
limited to, land preparation, such as grading, leveling, cutting and filling, sod,
landscaping, irrigation systems, sidewalks and drainage; lights, playground
equipment, play courts and public restrooms.
* The acquisition of land for park, recreational or open-space purposes.
* The acquisition of any existing improvement otherwise authorized.
Maintenance
Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual
maintenance, operation and servicing of any improvement, including:
* Repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement.
* Providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of landscaping, including
cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or
injury.
* The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste.
* The cleaning, sandblasting and painting of walls and other improvements to
remove or cover graffiti.
Servicing
Servicing means the furnishing of electric current, or energy, or other illuminating agent
and water for the irrigation of any landscaping, the operation of any fountains, or the
maintenance of any improvements.
6
BIB]
37175-U01
RESO-U02
98-33-U02
MAY-U02
6-U02
1998-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
FO1927-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
RESO-U05
98-33-U05
MAY-U05
6-U05
1998-U05
BIB]
37426-U01
1998-U02
033-U02
CC-U02
RESO-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
CITY-U05
COUNCIL-U05
MINUTES-U05
1998 033 CC RESO¹òw @˜ ‘ t
RESO 98-33 MAY 6 1998YH3
8 LAND USE DEFINITIONS
The District assessment is based on land use such that property owners are assessed in
proportion to the benefits received. The land uses defined below are descriptive of all
parcels expected to exist in the City of Baldwin Park in FY 1998-99 In the event there is
a question regarding the land use designation of any parcel in the District, the City
Engineer will be responsible for administratively assigning one of the land uses listed
below.
TABLE I- FYI 998199 LAND USE DEFINITIONS
Land Use Code Land Use Description
SFR Single family residential parcels
CONDO Condominium or townhome parcels
MFR Multiple family residential parcels 2 dwellings or more)
MH Mobile homes or Mobile Home Parks
NONRES Commercial and industrial parcels
INSTITUTION Institutional Parcels owned by non-profit organizations
Parcels without a building or similar structure designated
VACANT for each land use
GOVT Parcels owned by a public agency
EXE Parcels exempt from the assessment, because they do not
benefit from park maintenance sliver, open space, common
area, railroad, or utility easement parcels)
SPECIAL BENEFIT OF PARKS
Articles XII IC and XIIID of the California Constitution require that a parcel's assessment
may not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that
parcel. The Articles provide that only special benefits are assessable. The general
benefits must be separated from the special benefits conferred on a parcel, a special
benefit being a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred
on the public at large, including real property within the district. The general enhancement
of property value does not constitute a special benefit.
The Open Space Element within the General Plan for the City of Baldwin Park notes that
the City is almost completely built out, and open space is limited to existing parks, school
grounds, utility rights-of-way, and water channel areas. Within the City, over 530 acres of
these properties are designated as open space. Baldwin Park offers five City parks and
7
BIB]
37175-U01
RESO-U02
98-33-U02
MAY-U02
6-U02
1998-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
FO1927-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
RESO-U05
98-33-U05
MAY-U05
6-U05
1998-U05
BIB]
37426-U01
1998-U02
033-U02
CC-U02
RESO-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
CITY-U05
COUNCIL-U05
MINUTES-U05
1998 033 CC RESO¹òw @˜ ‘ t RESO 98-33 MAY 6 1998YH38seventeen school playgrounds for recreation. Morgan Park recently underwent a 2.5 acre
expansion, where a new Community Center has been built, in addition to the Activities
Building containing meeting rooms, cooking facilities and a game room, and the Senior
Citizens Center containing meeting rooms.
Morgan Park offers the most activities of any recreation area in the City, including boxing,
horseshoes, basketball and volleyball. Morgan Park is centrally located, with the other City
parks located south and west near the City's periphery. The area north of Los Angeles
Street contains six elementary school sites, but no parks. About 60 percent of Baldwin
Park's City park area is located south of Ramona Boulevard.
Baldwin Park's recreation facilities and parks are vital to the community, especially for the
high-density residential developments which do not provide adequate play areas for their
residents. Upon full build-out, it is expected that the City will have a ratio of 3 acres of
parks, including school areas, for each 1,000 residents. This ratio is well within the
National Recreation and Parks Association recommended standard of 2.5 acres per 1,000
residents. The majority of the City's park land is under the control of the Baldwin Park
Unified School District, with the City controlling 10 percent of the total park land.
Parks and recreational activities are managed by the City of Baldwin Park through a
division of the City organization. As such, all parks administration and planning are
centralized while recreational activities are conducted on a community-wide basis to take
advantage of existing park facilities. This approach promotes the parks as a system or
network to be used on a City-wide basis, rather than on a service radius basis which may
be more common in other jurisdictions. All of the parks and recreational facilities are
equally accessible to all the properties in the District.
The maintenance of parks and recreational improvements provide a particular and distinct
special benefit to parcels within the District. The desirability of parcels within the District
is specifically enhanced by the presence of well-maintained parks and recreational facilities
which are available for the use and enjoyment of residents, customers, clients, employees
and visitors of the assessed parcels. Having properly maintained parks readily accessible
to properties within the District means that the owners and visitors of the assessed parcels
may enjoy the benefits of such improvements available for use while avoiding the expense
of privately installing and maintaining similar improvements.
Only the parks summarized in this Report are funded through the District. The other open
space areas that contribute to the open space element of the City, are funded separately.
The location of all the parks in the District were found to be within 1 314 miles of at least
one park, and 3/4 mile of at least one recreational facility in the District.
Although some properties in the District are within 3/4 mile of more than one park, it was
determined that residents cannot use the facilities of more than one park at one time, so
the assessment rates are established at a uniform level throughout the District.
8
BIB]
37175-U01
RESO-U02
98-33-U02
MAY-U02
6-U02
1998-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
FO1927-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
RESO-U05
98-33-U05
MAY-U05
6-U05
1998-U05
BIB]
37426-U01
1998-U02
033-U02
CC-U02
RESO-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
CITY-U05
COUNCIL-U05
MINUTES-U05
1998 033 CC RESO¹òw @˜ ‘ t
1998 033 CC RESO¹òw @˜ ‘ t
RESO 98-33 MAY 6 1998YH3
8would indicate a higher than average special benefit from the funded park improvements.
In addition, in higher density areas such as the District, the value of the open spaces
afforded by parks is at a particular premium.
However, parks and recreational facilities are an important part of any thriving community.
The general benefit arising from the park and recreational improvements can be measured
by examining the usage of the facilities by the public at large. Each park has been
examined to determine the average number of registrations received by the Recreation and
Community Services Department for individuals or teams from outside of the District
boundaries. The percentage of out-of-district registrations to total registrations is used to
determine that portion of the park budget related to general versus special benefit. City
staff has determined that out-of-District registrations equal approximately 15 percent of all
registrations. Thus, 15 percent of the assessment budget will be assigned as general
benefit. In addition, the City has elected to contribute an additional amount over and above
the 15 percent level in order to maintain assessments at approximately the same amount
as in prior years.
FORMULA
The formula recognizes that properties have different levels of benefit depending upon the
typical population associated with the type of land use. The formula takes these
differences into consideration and fairly distributes the special benefit among all residential
parcels and lots within the District. Each of the special benefits identified above in Special
Benefit of Parks" are considered to benefit each parcel in proportion to the typical
population associated with the parcel's land use as reported by the City of Baldwin Park
Planning Division.
In order to establish the proportionate share of benefit from any one parcel of land in
relation to the total benefit to the District, it is necessary to establish a benchmark to relate
that one parcel to all others. This benchmark is called the Equivalent Dwelling Unit. The
District uses a single family residence as the benchmark Equivalent Dwelling Unit. All
other land uses, as represented on the County Assessor's master property file, will be
compared to the benchmark of the Single Family Residence to gain a comparative
Equivalent Dwelling Unit EDU") based on population data as found in the 1990 Census
Data for Baldwin Park, as provided by the City of Baldwin Park's Planning Division.
Following is a discussion of EDU values for each type of land use within the Assessment
District.
The EDU values for condominiums, multi-family and mobile homes are based upon a
comparison of the average population per household for single-family residences versus
the average household population in condominiums, multi-family and mobile homes. The
calculation of each EDU value is shown below:
10
BIB]
37175-U01
RESO-U02
98-33-U02
MAY-U02
6-U02
1998-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
FO1927-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
RESO-U05
98-33-U05
MAY-U05
6-U05
1998-U05
BIB]
37426-U01
1998-U02
033-U02
CC-U02
RESO-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
CITY-U05
COUNCIL-U05
MINUTES-U05
1998 033 CC RESO¹òw @˜ ‘ t RESO 98-33 MAY 6 1998YH38For Single Family Residential:
Single family population per household 4.06
1.00 EDU's/unit
Single family population per household 4.06
For Condominium Residential:
Condo population per household 3.75
0.92 EDU's/unit
Single family population per household 4.06
For Multi-Family Residential:
Multi-family population per household 4.25
1.04 EDU's/unit
Single family population per household 4.06
For Mobile Home Residential:
Mobile Home population per household 2.03
0.50 EDU's/unit
Single family population per household 4.06
The EDU values for commercial, office, business and industrial land uses non-
residential") are based on a comparison of the typical single family lot acreage versus the
actual size of the non-residential use. Special benefit to non-residential parcels results
from the use of recreational facilities by employees and customers, which generally
increases in number as the parcel size increases. Therefore, the assessment on non-
residential property is based on acres, as opposed to residential parcels which are based
on dwelling units.
Within the District, the typical single-family parcel size is 8,500 square feet. Approximately
20 percent of each acre of residential land, on average, is dedicated for streets and other
public uses resulting in a net acreage available for the subdivision of approximately 4.10
lots per acre, which is rounded down to 4 lots per acre. Therefore, using the single family
residence as a base, an acre of non-residential property receives the same number of
EDU's as an acre of residential property, that is, 4 EDU per acre.
Non-residential lots 4/acre 4 lots per acre
4.00 EDU's /acre
Single family EDU 1.00
11
BIB]
37175-U01
RESO-U02
98-33-U02
MAY-U02
6-U02
1998-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
FO1927-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
RESO-U05
98-33-U05
MAY-U05
6-U05
1998-U05
BIB]
37426-U01
1998-U02
033-U02
CC-U02
RESO-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
CITY-U05
COUNCIL-U05
MINUTES-U05
1998 033 CC RESO¹òw @˜ ‘ t RESO 98-33 MAY 6 1998YH38Furthermore, non-residential parcels more than half an acre and less than an acre are
assigned a minimum of 4 EDU per parcel to reflect the minimum benefit these parcels
receive. Non-residential parcels below one-half acre are assigned 50 percent of 4.0
EDU's, or 2.0 EDU's per parcel.
For Non-Residential 5 acre):
Non-residential lots 2/half acre 2 lots per half acre
2.00 EDU's/part acre
Single family EDU 1.00
The EDU value for the institutional, church, school, college and day care land uses
institutional") is calculated at one 1) EDU per parcel. This per parcel assessment rather
than per acre assessment is in recognition of this land use category's traditionally lower
demand for park facilities as indicated by the City's Recreation and Community Services
staff. In addition, institutional parcels receive less benefit than other non-residential parcels
in the District from the operation, maintenance and servicing of parks in the City for several
reasons. Institutional parcels function differently than non-residential parcels in that they:
1) typically operate fewer days in the week, 2) generally have an inconsistent number of
people using the facilities daily, and 3) have a less intensive use than the property size
alone would indicate because in general, the institutional parcels in the District contain
large green areas that function as open space. Therefore, the institutional parcels should
be assessed at a lower level than the non-residential parcels, and are assigned 1 EDU per
parcel.
As a result of the passage of Proposition 218, the assessment methodology for the new
Park Maintenance Assessment District has to determine the special benefit attributable to
public agency parcels within the new District boundary. Section 4 of the Proposition states,
Parcels within a district that are owned or used by any agency, the State of California or
the United States shall not be exempt from assessment unless the agency can
demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that such publicly owned parcels in fact
receive no special benefit.,'
In comparison to non-residential and institutional parcels, governmental properties also
benefit from the proper maintenance of parks, since such parks attract potential customers
and employees as shown below. Certain governmental parcels benefit from the District
because the proper maintenance, operation and servicing of parks:
* reduces property-related crimes against properties within the District, especially
vandalism, through the abatement of graffiti;
* improves the aesthetics of public parcels through the proper maintenance of
landscaping and the planting of otherwise barren areas;
* reduces pollution and noise in surrounding areas throughout the provision of open
space; and
* by improving the physical and visual environment and making the District area a
more desirable and attractive place to work and do business.
BIB]
37175-U01
RESO-U02
98-33-U02
MAY-U02
6-U02
1998-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
FO1927-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
RESO-U05
98-33-U05
MAY-U05
6-U05
1998-U05
BIB]
37426-U01
1998-U02
033-U02
CC-U02
RESO-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
CITY-U05
COUNCIL-U05
MINUTES-U05
1998 033 CC RESO¹òw @˜ ‘ t RESO 98-33 MAY 6 1998YH38Additionally:
Having properly maintained parks readily accessible to the public properties
means that the public agencies may enjoy the benefits of such improvements
available for use while avoiding the expense of privately installing and
maintaining similar improvements; and
Spraying and treating of landscaping for disease and weed control reduces
the likelihood of insect or weed infestation spreading to the landscaping
located on public properties within the District.
However, governmental parcels receive less benefit than other non-residential parcels in
the District from the operation, maintenance and servicing of parks in the City. For
instance, a portion of most public properties are used as park and/or recreation areas.
This portion of these properties does not benefit from the District improvements because
it provides the same use and function that the funded improvements provide. Additionally,
governmental properties generally do not benefit from the resale value of their properties.
Consequently, the specific benefit of increased property value that is conferred to other
properties in the District is not conferred to governmental properties. Therefore, the
governmental parcels are assessed at one quarter the rate of non-residential uses, but as
the size of the parcel increases, the benefit increases, and therefore, the assessment
amount increases.
The special benefit to undeveloped property in the residential, non-residential and
institutional land use categories is based on the assumption that such undeveloped
property benefits from the ongoing maintenance of recreational facilities because the
facilities will be in good and ready condition in the future when the vacant property is
developed. For the purposes of this Engineer's Report, the special benefit to undeveloped
property is assigned a value corresponding to 40 percent of the developed property EDU
values for the same land use designations. This discounted value recognizes the reduced
current value due to the uninhabited nature of the property.
Finally, parcels of raw land and homeowner's association common area are assigned an
EDU value of zero 0), based on a projection that these parcels are likely never to develop
and therefore will receive no benefit from the improvements. Similarly, railroad rig right-of-way
parcels, public utility right-of-way and well site or reservoir site parcels, water rights parcels,
and other similar land uses are also assigned an EDU value of 0, because of little or no
possibility for residential or non-residential or institutional development and therefore no
benefit.
The following Table 2- Assessment Factors sets forth the population per unit as shown
in the 1990 City of Baldwin Park census data, the equivalent dwelling units as discussed
above, and the resulting assessment amount per unit, parcel or acre.
13
BIB]
37175-U01
RESO-U02
98-33-U02
MAY-U02
6-U02
1998-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
FO1927-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
RESO-U05
98-33-U05
MAY-U05
6-U05
1998-U05
BIB]
37426-U01
1998-U02
033-U02
CC-U02
RESO-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
CITY-U05
COUNCIL-U05
MINUTES-U05
1998 033 CC RESO¹òw @˜ ‘ t RESO 98-33 MAY 6 1998YH38 TABLE 2- ASSESSMENT FACTORS
Population Equivalent Assessment per Unit,
Land Use Description per Unit Dwelling Units Parcel or Acre
Single Family Residential 4.06/unit 1.00/unit $22.60/unit
Vacant Single Family Residential 0.40/parcel $9.04/parcel
Condominium 3.75/unit 0.921/unit $20.79/unit
Multiple Family 4.25/unit 1.04/unit $23.50/unit
Mobile Home 2.03/unit 0.50/unit $11.30/unit
Non-Residential> I acre 4.00/acre 4.00/acre $90.40/acre
Non-Residential> 5 1 acre 4.00/parcel 4.00/parcel $90.40/parcel
Non-Residential 5 acre 4.00/parcel 2.00/parcel $45.20/parcel
Vacant Non-Residential> 1 acre 1.60/acre $36.16/acre
Vacant Non-Residential 5 acre 1 60/parcel $36.1 6/parcel
1 acre
Vacant Non-Residential 5 acre 0.80/parcel $18.08/parcel
Institutional 1.00/parcel I 00/parcel $22.60/parcel
Vacant Institutional 0.40/parcel $9.04/parcel
Government> I acre 4.00/acre 1.00/acre $22.60/acre
Government> 5 acre 1 acre 4.091/parcel 1.00/parcel $22.60/parcel
Government 5 acre 4.00/parcel 0.50/parcel $1 1.30/parcel
Exemption 0.00/parcel $0.00/parcel
ENGINEERING AND INCIDENTAL EXPENSES
All parcels within the District benefit from the ongoing operation of the District. Therefore
all parcels assessed in the District receive a proportional share of the administrative costs
for the District based on their assessment for park maintenance.
THE MAXIMUM ASSESSMENT AND ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT
Upon approval of a majority vote of the property owners, the Fiscal Year 1998-1999
Maximum Assessment is the annual assessment shown in the Assessment Roll, on file in
the Office of the City Clerk and by this reference incorporated herein. Commencing with
Fiscal Year 1999-2000 and for each year thereafter, the assessment for the District is
subject to an Annual Adjustment limit. The Annual Adjustment shall not exceed the
change in the Consumer Price Index CPI"), All Urban Consumers, for the Los Angeles-
Anaheim-Riverside Area from January through January of the previous calendar year.
14
BIB]
37175-U01
RESO-U02
98-33-U02
MAY-U02
6-U02
1998-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
FO1927-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
RESO-U05
98-33-U05
MAY-U05
6-U05
1998-U05
BIB]
37426-U01
1998-U02
033-U02
CC-U02
RESO-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
CITY-U05
COUNCIL-U05
MINUTES-U05
1998 033 CC RESO¹òw @˜ ‘ t RESO 98-33 MAY 6 1998YH38Future annual assessments within this limit may be approved by the City Council without
additional property owner ratification. These limits may be exceeded only with a majority
property owner approval of either: 1) a supplemental assessment; 2) a revision of or
supplement to the maximum assessment and/or adjustment formula, or 3) any other
methodology amenable to the property owners within the District boundary.
TOTAL ASSESSMENT
The total assessment for each parcel is the sum of its assessment for park maintenance
and engineering and incidentals.
15
BIB]
37175-U01
RESO-U02
98-33-U02
MAY-U02
6-U02
1998-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
FO1927-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
RESO-U05
98-33-U05
MAY-U05
6-U05
1998-U05
BIB]
37426-U01
1998-U02
033-U02
CC-U02
RESO-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
CITY-U05
COUNCIL-U05
MINUTES-U05
1998 033 CC RESO¹òw @˜ ‘ t RESO 98-33 MAY 6 1998YH38 ASSESSMENT ROLL
Each parcel's Assessor Parcel Number APN) and total assessment to be levied for Fiscal
Year 1998-1999 is shown on the assessment roll for the District on file in the City Clerk's
Office and incorporated herein by reference. Reference is made to the Los Angeles
County Assessment roll for further description of the parcels in the District.
16
BIB]
37175-U01
RESO-U02
98-33-U02
MAY-U02
6-U02
1998-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
FO1927-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
RESO-U05
98-33-U05
MAY-U05
6-U05
1998-U05
BIB]
37426-U01
1998-U02
033-U02
CC-U02
RESO-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
CITY-U05
COUNCIL-U05
MINUTES-U05
1998 033 CC RESO¹òw @˜ ‘ t RESO 98-33 MAY 6 1998YH38 DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS
Plans and Specifications
Park Maintenance. Maps showing the location of parks within the District, and
specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of park maintenance
within the District, are on file in the office of the City Clerk and incorporated herein by
reference.
17
BIB]
37175-U01
RESO-U02
98-33-U02
MAY-U02
6-U02
1998-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
FO1927-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
RESO-U05
98-33-U05
MAY-U05
6-U05
1998-U05
BIB]
37426-U01
1998-U02
033-U02
CC-U02
RESO-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
CITY-U05
COUNCIL-U05
MINUTES-U05
1998 033 CC RESO¹òw @˜ ‘ t RESO 98-33 MAY 6 1998YH38 COST ESTIMATE
FY 98-99 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE Estimated) $ 135,811.00
FY 98-99 PROJECTED REVENUES
Park Maintenance District $ 403,356.00
City Contribution for General Benefit of Parks $ 460,336.00
TOTAL REVENUES $ 999,503.00
FY 98-99 PROJECTED EXPENDITURES
Maintenance and Operation $ 352.200,00
Utilities $ 80,300.00
Capital Improvement Projects $ 200,000.00
Capital Outlay $ 15,000.00
Contractual Services $ 6,500.00
Administrative Overhead $ 227,120.00
Central Park West Renovation $ 106,000.00
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 987,120.00
PROJECTED BALANCE June 30, 1999)
FY 98-99 Revenue $ 999,503.00
FY 98-99 Expenditure $ 987,12000
Assessment District Reserves $ 12,383.00
For unforeseen circumstances and emergencies)
18
BIB]
37175-U01
RESO-U02
98-33-U02
MAY-U02
6-U02
1998-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
FO1927-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
RESO-U05
98-33-U05
MAY-U05
6-U05
1998-U05
BIB]
37426-U01
1998-U02
033-U02
CC-U02
RESO-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
CITY-U05
COUNCIL-U05
MINUTES-U05
1998 033 CC RESO¹òw @˜ ‘ t RESO 98-33 MAY 6 1998YH38 CERTIFICATIONS
It is my opinion that the assessments within the City of Baldwin Park Citywide Park
Maintenance Assessment District are apportioned by a formula that fairly distributes
special benefit in accordance with the benefits that are received.
ENGINEER'S REPORT SUBMITTED BY:
SIGNATURE DATE
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Sid Jalal Mousavi, Director of Public Works of the City of Baldwin
Park by virtue of the power vested in me under the Resolution and the order of the City
Council, hereby make the benefit assessments as defined by this Engineer's Report.
Dated:
Sid Jalal Mousavi
Director of Public Works
City of Baldwin Park
19
BIB]
37175-U01
RESO-U02
98-33-U02
MAY-U02
6-U02
1998-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
FO1927-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
RESO-U05
98-33-U05
MAY-U05
6-U05
1998-U05
BIB]
37426-U01
1998-U02
033-U02
CC-U02
RESO-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
CITY-U05
COUNCIL-U05
MINUTES-U05
RESO 98-33 MAY 6 1998YH3
8In addition to providing opportunities for recreational use, the proper maintenance of park
and recreational facilities improves the aesthetics of parcels within the District. Proper
maintenance of landscaping reduces pollution and noise, provides for open space and the
planting of otherwise barren areas, and reduces property-related crimes within the District,
especially vandalism, through the removal and abatement of graffiti. The U.S. Department
of the Interior, National Parks Service, in a publication of June 1984, concluded that, An
investment in parks and recreation helps reduce pollution and noise, makes communities
more livable, and increases property value." All of the above benefits contribute to a
specific enhancement of the quality of life and property values related to each of the
assessable parcels within the District.
In addition, the operation and maintenance of the City's parks confers a particular and
distinct special benefit upon assessed parcels within the District, as follows.
* The proper maintenance of parks and appurtenant facilities specially benefits
parcels within the District by improving the physical and visual environment
and making the District area more desirable.
* Parcels within the District are specially benefitted when public infrastructure
including parks are in place, safe, clean and well-maintained.
* The proper maintenance of parks by the District provides increased District-
wide attractiveness to prospective buyers.
* The desirability of parcels within the District is specifically enhanced by the
presence of well-maintained parks which are available for the use and
enjoyment of the property owners and the visitors of the assessed parcels.
* Having properly maintained parks readily accessible to properties within the
District means that the owners and visitors of the assessed parcels may
enjoy the benefits of such improvements available for use while avoiding the
expense of privately installing and maintaining similar improvements.
* The proper maintenance of landscaped parks provides increased
attractiveness of the District as a place to live, work and do business.
* Spraying and treating of landscaping for disease and weed control reduces
the likelihood of insect or weed infestation spreading to the landscaping
located on properties within the District.
GENERAL BENEFIT OF PARKS
In addition to the special benefits received by the parcels in the District, there are general
benefits conferred on the public at large by the maintenance, operation and servicing of
park and recreational facilities.
Census data and socio-economic characteristics for the City of Baldwin Park would
generally indicate a higher than average park usage by local residents. The higher
densities and a greater number of persons per household as documented by census data
9
BIB]
37175-U01
RESO-U02
98-33-U02
MAY-U02
6-U02
1998-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
FO1927-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
RESO-U05
98-33-U05
MAY-U05
6-U05
1998-U05
BIB]
37426-U01
1998-U02
033-U02
CC-U02
RESO-U02
LG1-U03
LI3-U03
FO1126-U03
FO1153-U03
DO1931-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
10/10/2001-U04
ADMIN-U04
CITY-U05
COUNCIL-U05
MINUTES-U05