HomeMy WebLinkAbout1972 141 CC RESO1972 141 CC RESO (Ìì ý ÔÏRESOLUTION JO.72-141
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF BALDWIN PARK REQUEST ING THAT THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA BY LAW PROVIDE FOR THE ALLOCATION
OF REVENUE SHARING FUNDS AMONG UNITS OF LOCAL
GOVERNMENT ON AN OPTIONAL FORMULA BASIS AS
AUTHORIZED UNDER THE STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL
ASSISTANCE ACT OF 1972
WHEREAS, the original House formula and the amended
formula agreed to by the House and Senate Conferees for the
Revenue Sharing program results in approxirately the alloca-
tions to the various cities of Los Angeles County as shown
on the attached.
WHEREAS, the original House formula gave weight to
peculation and relative per capita income and resulted in
per capita allocations to Los Angeles County cities rangincf
from a low of $7.65 Beverly Hills) to a high of $13.^0
Conn? ton), with an average County-wide allocation of
approximately $10.50, and
WHEREAS, this was a reasonable and fair method of
allocating Revenue Sharing Funds, giving due weight to tJ^e
ability to pay" or relative need" concert, and
WHEREAS, the amended allocation method acrreed tn by
the Hou^p and Senate conferees minimizes the pooulatior
factor and gives undue weight to general tax effort anC.
relative nor capita income factors, thereby resulting in oer
capita allocations to Los Angeles County cities ranging
from a low of $2.74 Cerritos) to a high of $26.94 Comirercp)
with an average per capita County-wide allocation of approx-
imately $10.00, and furthermore,
WHEREAS, in the determination of a municipality's
general tax effort, the actual taxes oaid by it-^- citizen^
were i gnored in favor of the actual taxes levied bv the
community, since apparently excluded in the general tax
effort factor are all snecial district taxes naid, anc-1
WHEREAS, serious inecrui ti-es result frorr' thes? deficien-
cies in the amended formula/ and are readily aooarent and
reflected by the fact that a city with a r^onulation of onlv
15,350 receives a higher allocation, $397,293, than a citv
with a population of 32,464, $114,457, and also bv the fact
that the highest per capita allocation, $26.94, is made to
a city which is generally recognized in the area as beinc-
the community which can best afford services to its citizens
without the benefit of Revenue Sharing assistance.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the Citv of Baldwin
Park does resolve as follows;
That the State of Califorria avail it^plf of tbo special
allocation rules of the State and Local Fiscal Assistance
Act of 1972 and provide by law for an optional formula for
distribution of future Revenue Sharing Funds among units of
local government on a basis which gives more weight to popula-
tion and relative oer capita income, and le^s weight to the
general tax effort factor, thereby minimizing the effects of
the deficiencies in the aJlocation method finally adopted.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the League nf California
C3 ties and the legislative bodies of everv city in California
BIB]
37691-U01
1972-U02
141-U02
CC-U02
RESO-U02
LI3-U03
FO10488-U03
FO11508-U03
DO11679-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
3/10/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04
1972 141 CC RESO (Ìì ý ÔÏREVENUE SHARING ALLOCATIONS
CITIES OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY
Original
Formula
Population
62,1251
45,138
14,757
1,520
25,217
47,285
21,836
51,454
29,308
33,416
1,098
88,871
72,358
21,500
24,400
10,536
78,661
31,332
16,998
36,050
88,445
14,981
70,012
15,620
45,191
132,664
32,374
9,850
53,304
17,412
2,050
33,744
712
89,985
784
83,025
32,464
31,092
13,800
24,825
19,784
361,321
2,835,600
Per
Capita
$ 644,4002
391,121
188,450
lhambra
read! a
rtesia
vaion
Azusa
Baldwin Park
Bell
Bel flower
Bell Gardens
Beverly Hills
Bradbury
Burbank
Carson
Cerritos
Claremont
Commerce
Compton
Covina
Cudahy
Culver City
Downey
Duarte
El Monte
El Segundo
Gardena
Glendale
Glendora
Hawaiian Gardens
Hawthorne
Hermosa Beach
Hidden Hills
Huntington Park
Industry
Inglewood
dale
wood
lirada
lente
$ 10.37
8.67
12.77
12.23
12.95
11.35
11.12
13.54
7.65
10.17
7.86
9.77
12.98
13.90
10.63
13.42
8.58
10.10
12.17
12.28
10.09
9.72
9.98
10.59
13.78
10.74
9.86
11.21
10.33
10.98
10.37
13.37
10.72
11.98
11.01
10.47
10.48
$ 527,535
177,825
58/376
350,639
293,001
169,905
191,161
140,822
124,147
886,160
58,908
108,449
283,788
1,358,660
354,888
63,151
440,472
436,401
55,657
714,930
303,663
354,171
821,657
201,167
65,349
377,152
96,566
416,918
667,004
359,935
114,457
181,017
85,689
92,230
73,601
3,746,725
35,442,819
Unknown
308,511
612,154
247,867
572,127
396,702
255,534
Unknown
904,095
U nk n o w n
168,909
238,340
136,794
1,093,628
332,930
228,093
309,233
893,122
182,367
859,800
157,673
439,371
1,323,325
342,753
135,749
572,449
171,624
Unknown
378,204
Unknown
929,162
Unknown
911,753
336,632
415,728
147,889
297,298
217,860
3,781,603
29,715,295
/erne
Jndale
l ita
Long Beach
Los Angeles
1971 population for Motor Vehicle License Fee Apportionments to cities.
As published in the LOS ANGELES TIMES
Amended
Formula
2
Per
Capita
$ 8.49
3.94
3.96
13.91
6.20
7.78
3.72
4.81
3.72
9.97
2.74
4.45
26.94
17.27
11.33
3.72
12.22
4.93
3.72
10.21
19.44
7.84
6.19
6.21
6.63
7.08
5.55
12.36
7.41
4.34
3.53
5.82
6.21
3.72
3.72
10.37
12.50
BIB]
37691-U01
1972-U02
141-U02
CC-U02
RESO-U02
LI3-U03
FO10488-U03
FO11508-U03
DO11679-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
3/10/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04
1972 141 CC RESO (Ìì ý ÔÏRevenue Sharing Allocations
Cit les of Los Angeles County
City
Lynwood
Manhattan Beach
Population
43,354
35,352
16,996
30,015
42,807
49,166
91,827
8,511
lonrovia
lontebello
lonterey Park
orwalk
almdale
alos Verdes Estates 13,631
Paramount 34,734
Pasadena 112,951
PIco Rivera 54,170
Pomona 87,384
Redondo Beach 57,451
Rolling Hills 1,529
Rolling Hills Estates 6,735
Rosemead 40,972
San Dimas 16,000
San Femando 16,571
San Gabriel 29,336
San Marino 14,177
Santa Fe Springs 15,350
Santa Monica 88,349
Sierra Madre 12,140
Signal Hill 5,588
South El Monte 16,115
South Gate 56,909
South Pasadena 23,250
Temple City 31,000
Torrance 134,968
Vernon 261
Walnut 5,992
West Covina 68,400
Whittier 72,863
Original
Formula
489,895
337,200
203,470
337,749
461,745
514,468
1,128,927
95,721
114,029
428,235
1,125,486
668,498
1,047,232
613,771
Unknown
59,572
502,926
180,670
198,970
308,763
111,268
179,190
874,039
119,672
58,671
179,420
624,130
213,244
320,836
1,375,975
Unknown
64,464
735,298
732,474
Per Amended
Capita Formula
11.30 229,823
9.54 160,150
11.97 130,934
11.25 375,512
10.79 437,724
10.46 301,682
12.29 362,375
11.25 35,834
8.37 50,679
12.33 203,748
9.96 1,088,116
12.34 272,003
11.98 1,367,975
10.68 649,765
8.85 25,022
12.28 152,219
11.29 58,299
12.01 298,550
10.53 212,058
7.85 53,670
11.67 397,293
9.89 746,774
9.86 45,102
10.50 122,885
11.13 204,394
10.97 408,468
9.17 85,371
10.35 110,241
10.20 1,014,095
10.76 22,261
10.75 421,649
10.05 430,052
BIB]
37691-U01
1972-U02
141-U02
CC-U02
RESO-U02
LI3-U03
FO10488-U03
FO11508-U03
DO11679-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
3/10/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04
1972 141 CC RESO (Ìì ý ÔÏsolution o. 72-141
Pncrp! 2
be recruested to consider and adopt a similar resolution urgino
enactment of legislation by the State of California as recom-
mended above.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVKD that the Citv Clerk forwarc copies
of this Resolution to California State Senator Alfred Song anc7
State Assemblymen Harvey Johnson and William Campbell,
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1st day of November______
1972.
ATTEST:
c^^^_________
Thelma L. Balkus, City Clerk
STATP OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SS.
CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
I, TIIELMA L. BALKUS, City Clerk of the City of Dal^win
Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was
duly and regularly passed and adopted by the City Council
of the City of Baldwin Park at its regular meeting heir"; nn
the j^pt____day of November i 1972, by the followirf
vote:
AYES COUNCILMEN; Gregory,, King, Hamilton, McCaron,Mavor Blewe 11--
NOES; COUNCILMEN
ABSENT; COUNCILMEN:
6^L^^ TS^L^J
Thelma L. Palkus
City Clerk
BIB]
37691-U01
1972-U02
141-U02
CC-U02
RESO-U02
LI3-U03
FO10488-U03
FO11508-U03
DO11679-U03
C6-U03
RESO-U03
3/10/2003-U04
ROBIN-U04